UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

___________________

FORM 10-K

ý[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20152017

 

Commission file number 0-15476

EMERALD MEDICAL APPLICATIONS CORP.
VIRTUAL CRYPTO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.

(Exact Name Of Registrant As Specified In Its Charter)

Delaware68-0080601
(State of Incorporation)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
  
7 Imber40 Wall Street, Petach Tikva, Israel28th Floor, New York, NY495114110005
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(ZIP Code)

 

Registrant'sRegistrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code: +(972) 3-744-4505(212) 400-7198

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of The Act: Common Stock, $0.0001

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x[X] No ¨

[  ]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant'sregistrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨[  ]

On June 30, 2015,2017, the aggregate market value of the 5,713,9856,729,687 shares of common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $3,999,789$26,920 based on the closing price of $0.70$0.04 of the RegistrantsRegistrant’s common stock on June 30, 2015.2017. On March 31, 2016,April __, 2018, the Registrant had 18,624,46159,206,415 shares of common stock outstanding.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer (as(as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) or a smaller reporting company.company.

Large accelerated filer¨[  ]Accelerated filer¨[  ]Non-Accelerated filer¨[  ]Smaller reporting companyx[X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨[  ] No x



[X]

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item
____
Description
   _________
Page
____
 

PART I

 
ITEM 1.DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS3
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS115
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS2112
ITEM 2.DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTYPROPERTIES2112
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS2112
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES2113
 

PART II

 
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY2213
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA2517
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND PLAN OF OPERATION2518
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK2720
ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA2821
ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE4740
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES4740
ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION4740
PART III

PART III

 
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE4840
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION5042
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDER MATTERS5243
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE5243
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES5343
PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES5344


Cautionary Statement regarding Forward-Looking Statements

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Registrant has based these forward-looking statements on its current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about the Registrant that may cause its actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as "may," "will," "should," "could," "would," "expect," "plan," "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "continue,"“may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “continue,” or the negative of such terms or other similar expressions. Factors that might cause or contribute to such a discrepancy include, but are not limited to, those described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in the Registrant'sRegistrant’s other Securities and Exchange Commission filings.

PART I

ITEM 1. DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

BackOverview and recent developments

On January 29, 2018, Virtual Crypto Technologies, Inc., f/k/a Emerald Medical Applications Corp. (the “Registrant”) transferred the management shares of the Registrant’s former Israeli subsidiary, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. (“Emerald IL”) owned by the Registrant to TableAttorney Eviatar Knoller, Esq., with offices at20 Lincoln, Tel Aviv-Jaffa 6713412, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The purpose of Contentsthe transfer of the management shares to the Trustee, pursuant to resolution of the Registrant’s Board of Directors dated January 29, 2018, was to enable the Trustee to liquidate the management shares and/or the assets of Emerald IL to satisfy its debts.

Overview

The operations of its former subsidiary never generated any revenues, at September 30, 2017 had an accumulated deficit of $16,462,502,and was unable to raise capital to fund its ongoing operations and satisfy its financial obligations to former employees. As a result, the former employees of Emerald IL commenced an action in a court of competent jurisdiction in Israel to liquidate Emerald IL and use any assets to satisfy the debts owed to the former employees. Effective March 8, 2018, Emerald IL ceased to be a wholly-owned subsidiary and a part of the Registrant.

The Registrant previously disclosed in its Form 10-Q for the period-ended September 30, 2017, under Note 9-Subsequent Events, that it was considering the advisability of establishing another wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary engaging in operations that should be more readily able to generate revenues and positive cash flow from operations than Emerald IL, which failed to generate any revenues.

On January 17, 2018, the Registrant formed Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd as a new wholly-owned subsidiary under the laws of the State of Israel (“Virtual Crypto Israel”) and reported the appointment of Mr. Alon Dayan as CEO of the new subsidiary. Virtual Crypto Israel was formed to develop and market software and hardware products facilitating, allowing and supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices (the “Products”).

The Registrant filed a Form 8-K on January 24, 2018, reporting that through Virtual Crypto Israel, it entered into a binding term sheet (the “Chiron Term Sheet”) with Chiron Refineries Ltd. (“Chiron”), a public company listed on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE: CHR). Pursuant to the Chiron Term Sheet, a copy of which is attached as Exhibit 10.__ hereto, the Registrant’s subsidiary, Virtual Crypto Israel, shall: (i) appoint a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chiron, under incorporation under the laws of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, as the exclusive distributor of Virtual Crypto Israel’s Products in the territory of the Republic of Turkey, including the territory of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (the “Territory”); and (ii) the distributor shall have the right to appoint sub-distributors within the Territory. The appointment of the Chiron subsidiary as distributor is subject to the payment by the distributor of $250,000 as an appointment fee, of which $150,000 shall be deemed an advance payment by the distributor made on account of future purchases of our Products.

The Registrant filed a Definitive Information Statement on February 12, 2018 with respect to its name change from Emerald Medical Applications Corp. to Virtual Crypto Technologies, Inc. to reflect its new operations and business focus and effective on March 7, 2018, FINRA approved the Registrant’s name change and its trading symbol was changed from MRLA to VRCP on the OTCQB.

The disclosure in this annual report relates to our business activities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017. Additional disclosure has been included in this annual report related to recent developments and subsequent events that occurred after the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017.

Specifically, during the period commencing January 16, 2018 through March 23, 2018, the Registrant raised $1.9 million in equity capital (the “Equity Raise”) through the offering of units (the “Unit Offering”) at a price of $0.07 per Unit, each Unit consisting of one share of the Registrant’s restricted common stock, par value $0.0001 (the “Shares”) and one common stock purchase warrant (the “Warrants”) exercisable for a period of 24 months to purchase one additional Share at an exercise price of $0.14. The proceeds of the Equity Raise are being utilized by the Registrant to fund the operations of Virtual Crypto Israel including, but not limited to the costs associated with the development of the Products. Reference is made to the disclosure under Item 5. “Market For Registrant’s Common Stock, Related Stockholder Matters And Issuer Purchase Of Equity” and under Note 11-Subsequent Events, related to proceeds under the sub-captions“Issuance of convertible notes in 2018”and theEquity raise from the sale of units in 2018.”

The Unit Offering, which is continuing, was made by the Registrant: (i) principally pursuant to the exemption provided by Regulation S promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”); and (ii) to a lesser extent pursuant to Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Act; and (iii) and only to “accredited investors” as that term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Act. With respect to the Unit Offering made pursuant to Regulation S, the Units were offered in offshore transactions to persons who are not “U.S. Persons” as that term is defined in Rule 902 of Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under the Act.

Our Former DermaCompare Business. Our former wholly-owned subsidiary, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. (“Emerald IL”), was organized as a privately-owned company under the laws of the State of Israel on February 17, 2010. Emerald is2010, as a digital health startup company engaged in the development, sale and service of imaging solutions utilizing its proprietary DermaCompare software that it developed for use in derma imaging and analytics ("DermaCompare"(“DermaCompare”). Emerald believesThe Registrant believed that its proprietary DermaCompare software representsrepresented an advancement in skin cancer screening that should enablehave enabled physicians to more readily identify and monitor changes in their patients’ skin characteristics.

 

Emerald’sThe Registrant believed that Emerald IL’s DermaCompare solution allowswould allow dermatologists and other medical care professionals, using a set of 25 total body photography ("TBP"(“TBP”), to capture sets of skin lesion images with, among other devices, digital cameras and camera-equipped smart phones, or tablets. Thesewhich images arecould then be transmitted online and are remotely analyzed by professionals using our DermaCompare software.

 

Our sales and marketing plan which has already commenced, iswas to sell licensesservices for ourEmerald IL’s DermaCompare imaging software to: NHSs, HMOs, health insurance companies, hospitals and medical clinics through distributers, health care channel partners or directly through independent salespersons and/or web purchase to dermatologists and other physicians (GPs) that we expectexpected to purchase licenses based on the number of potential numbers of patients.

 

In furtherance of our business plan, which has resulted in us becoming an operating company, Emerald hasIL entered into a series of agreements with unaffiliated third parties for the distribution of its DermaCompare Technology, as follows:

1. On August 12, 2013, Emerald IL entered into an exclusive distribution with Derma Italy Sri, organized under the laws of the Italy ("(“Derma Italy"Italy”), pursuant to which Derma Italy was granted exclusive distribution rights in Italy;

2. On December 1, 2013, Emerald IL entered into a distribution agreement with S. Bokhorst - Creatiekracht, organized under the laws of the Netherlands, pursuant to which S. Bokhorst was granted exclusive distribution in the Netherlands;

3. On February 6, 2014, Emerald IL entered into a distribution agreement with Medical Edge Pty Ltd, organized under the laws of Australia ("(“Medical Edge"Edge”), pursuant to which Medical Edge was granted exclusive distribution rights in the markets of Australia, New Zealand and Oceania;

4. On January 14, 2015, Emerald IL entered into a Project Agreement with Realize S.A. and Ubitech, entities engaged in IT related to medical technology in Greece, and MEDISP and MPUoP, academic and research institutes in Greece (collectively, the "Greek Partners"“Greek Partners”). Emerald IL and the Greek Partners anticipatereported that they anticipated imminent grants from the Office of Chief Scientist of the State of Israel and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology of Greece, respectively, the proceeds of which willwere to be used for development of enhanced smartphone applications for diagnosis of early stage Melanoma.

Utilizing capital raised prior to and subsequent to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, Emerald completed the development of a commercial model of its DermaCompare Product and has commenced marketing efforts. Emerald is continuing to negotiate additional distribution agreements for territories including North America, Latin America, Southern Africa, Israel and elsewhere in Europe, among other countries and regions. We believe to generate revenues from our DermaCompare Technology during the first half of fiscal 2016. Emerald is continuing to work on The development of the "next generation" DermaCompare Technology, with enhanced features.Mark1, bi literal plan was finished successfully and approved by the Office of the Chief Scientist of Israel in February 2017.

 

Notwithstanding our belief that DermaCompare representsrepresented a significant advance on existing technologies, there arewere a number of potential difficulties that we might face,faced, including the following:

 

 We may not be able to raise sufficient additional funds to fully implement our business plan;
 Competitors may develop alternatives that render our DermaCompare software solution redundant or unnecessary;
 We may not obtain and maintain sufficient protection of our intellectual property;
 Our DermaCompare software may be shown to have characteristics that indicate it may be ineffective;
 Our DermaCompare may not be accepted by physicians including dermatologists and the medical community in general; and
 Strict government regulations and inappropriate reimbursement policies, especially in emerging economies, may hinder the growth of the dermatology device market.

 

DuringNotwithstanding the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, we raised $989,974 in equity and debt capital and we may be expected to require up to an additional $1.5 millionin capital during the next 12 months to fully implement our business plan and fund our operations.

Overview of Melanoma

Melanoma is a type of skin cancer which forms from melanocytes (pigment-containing cells in the skin), is very aggressive cancer and, at present, there is no cure for Melanoma.

In women, the most common location is the legs. Melanomas in men are most commonly located on the back. It is particularly common among Caucasians, especially northern Europeans and northwestern Europeans, as well as those living in sunny climates. Melanoma rates are higher in Oceania, North America, Europe, Southern Africa, and Latin America. This geographic pattern reflects the primary cause of Melanoma, ultraviolet light (UV) exposure in conjunction with the amount of skin pigmentation in the population. Melanocytes produce the dark pigment, melanin, which is responsible for the color of skin. These cells predominantly occur in skin, but are also found in other partsbeliefs of the body, including the bowel and the eye. Melanoma can originate in any part of the bodyRegistrant’s former management that contains melanocytes.

The treatment includes surgical removal of the tumor. If Melanoma is detected early, while it is still relatively small and thin in depth, and provided that it is timely removed or otherwise treated, the cure rates are very high. The likelihood that the Melanoma will reoccur or spread depends on how deeply it has penetrated into the layers of the skin. For Melanomas that come back or spread, treatments include chemo- and immunotherapy and/or radiation therapy. According to National Cancer Institute statistics, the survival rates in the US after five years are is on average 91%.

While Melanoma is less common than other types of skin cancer, it is far more serious if it is not detected in its early stages. Melanoma causes the vast majority of deaths related to skin cancer. Globally, in 2012, that most recent year for which statistics have been reported, Melanoma occurred in 232,000 people and resulted in 55,000 deaths according to the World Cancer Report 2014 of the World Health Organization ("WHO").

It is estimated that 420 million people across the globe are at high risk of Melanoma (See RED in Image).

The Dermatology Device Market

Various devices are used by dermatologists and surgeons to diagnose skin disorders and accurately determine the types of conditions and the treatments required. At present, the dermatology devices market consists of two segments:(i) diagnostic devices market; and (ii) treatment devices market. Our Product is part of the diagnostic device market aimed at increasing the speed and accuracy of skin disorder diagnosis at an early stage.

The respected research firm, "MarketsandMarkets.com," has forecast that the global market for dermatology devices to grow from $6.6 billion in 2014 to $11.3 billion by 2019 and the market in North America, a primary market that we hope to compete in, is expected to reach approximately $5.2 billion by 2019. The key factors expected to drive the forecasted growth are: (i) a rise in skin disorder incidence; (ii) an increase in awareness of available aesthetic procedures; (iii) advances in technology and rising prices; and (iv) the recognition by the population of the harmful effects of to exposure to the sun on skin. All of the forgoing are major contributing factors towards the increasing number of people that become more skin and health conscious.

The global dermatology devices market includes two distinct segments:

Diagnostic devices, such as dermatoscopes, microscopes and imaging techniques; and
Applications of these diagnostic devices, such as imaging processing software, skin cancer diagnosis technology, hair removal and wrinkle removal

Based on the 2014 MarketsandMarkets.com report, imaging techniques accounted for the largest share of the diagnostic devices segment. Skin cancer diagnosis technologies represents the largest share of the device applications market.

The global dermatology devices market is expected to grow faster due to the increasing number of people suffering from skin-related disorders and the number of people opting for less invasive cosmetic surgeries. These are important factors contributing to the increasing demand of dermatology devices, which, in turn, is expected to contribute to demand for our DermaCompare software solution.

Dermatology devices and respective applications are rapidly gaining popularity not only due to their major role in aesthetic but also the rising numbers of skin disorders such as vascular and pigmented lesions, skin cancer, acne problems and others conditions that vary in different regions of the world.

Geographically, we plan to cover four major regions including North America, Europe, Australia and the increasing market in major Asian countries including China, India and Japan, among others. Rising occurrence of skin related ailments along with technological advancements and higher healthcare expenditures have resulted in North America being the largest market for dermatology devices. This trend is expected to continue. In Australia, Melanoma is the fourth most common cancer with 1 in 14 males and 1 in 23 females expected to develop melanomas during their life time. Its incidence has been increasing by approximately 16% in males and approximately 24% in females over the next decade, according to a report by National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) and New Zealand Guidelines Group (NZGG). The Asian-Pacific market is anticipated to be most profitable due to highly untapped opportunities, rising public and physician awareness and improvement in healthcare infrastructure. Skin disorders such as acne, Melasma, dermatitis, skin warts, lesions and moles, especially in China and India, are projected to drive the Asian market.

Our Market Opportunity

The challenge for dermatologists is the detection of skin cancer in its early stages, which is crucial for patient survival. Approximately 60% of melanomas occur as a result of a new mole, while the remaining 40% are the result of a mole that has changed. Since the human body dynamically changes over time, dermatologists are still using manual techniques, which are time-consuming and, as a result, costly, often inaccurate and not readily available for population-wide screening. The most recent innovation in the skin cancer detection field is Total Body Photography ("TBP"), typically a set of 25 photos that cover the entire skin surface of the patient, and was adopted by dermatologists approximately fifteen years ago. At present, dermatologists recommend doing TBP on a yearly basis, comparing the photographs and detecting the key differences.

We believe that the most significant research in skin cancer detection over the last decade has been conducted principally in the state of Schleswig-Holstein, Germany. This has involved the use of manually taken TBP which, from an efficacy study performed for the early detection of skin cancer, found a 30% increase in the early discovery of skin cancer, resulting in approximately 90% of melanomas being diagnosed at an early stage and with mortality rates decreasing by approximately 50% of that expected five years after the study. As a result of the study, since 2008, the country has mandated a nationwide statutory plan for a bi-annual early screening of skin cancer for citizens aged 35.

Based on our estimates, there are approximately 420 million people, representing 7% of the total world population, that can be defined as within the Melanoma high risk group; the majority of which are living in the Western hemisphere. Melanoma patients are more likely to be found in countries with warm and sunny weather. The disease is, however, also prevalent in other regions such as China, India and elsewhere in the Far-East.

It is estimated that approximately 250,000 new cases of Melanoma are diagnosed worldwide each year. Based upon studies conducted by the National Institutes of Health ("NIH") and the Skin Cancer Foundation, an estimated 74,000 new cases of invasive Melanoma will be diagnosed in the US in 2015 with detection more frequently in male Caucasians. At present, Melanoma is the sixth leading cause of cancer mortality in men and the seventh leading cause of cancer fatalities in women. Based on these data, we believe that skin lesion imaging is expected to continue to be a growing market. We believe that current market potential is over $1 billion, although there can be no assurance that we willEmerald IL would be able to commercially exploit this large and growing demand.

At present,successfully market its DermaCompare Products, the most conventional and widely-used visualization method is a standard photograph followed by manual image analysis and then comparing these images with previously taken photographic images to reach a diagnosis. This traditional method has several disadvantages, including the fact that only the outermost layer of skin is imaged and subjected to diagnosis, the visual comparison process is time-consuming, expensive, and often inaccurate because it is dependent on the dermatologists eyes only. The standard conventional photograph method, although inexpensive, is inefficient and laborious for examination purposes and limits the market to dermatologists and specialized physicians.

By revolutionizing the fundamental approach in which skin lesions and/or Melanoma is diagnosed, especially in the early stages, we reasonably expect that our DermaCompare product should be well-positioned to become one of the leading applications in the market, although there can be no such assurance. We hope that this will be achievable by replacing the need for manual photo image analysis with automated image analytics software using advanced algorithms of our DermaCompare process for anchoring, identifying and detecting changes in the shapes, color and sizes of skin lesions. We also plan to utilize available large data bases together with new "computer learning" and "artificial intelligence" techniques to learnRegistrant never generated any revenues from the "wisdomoperations of the crowd" and, based on business analytic tools, we will use as a DSS (Decision Support System) for all range of physicians.

Our DermaCompare imaging software solution should provide several benefits including, but not limited to:

shortening the physician’s diagnostic procedure, which is both time-consuming and limits care only to those with very high expertise;
replacing manual photo analysis with our DermaCompare application that enables a more in-depth diagnosis; and
opening the market to less experienced physicians in less served markets outside of urban and suburban areas, thereby increasing the potential clientele and patient base significantly.

With the rise of the incidences of skin cancer, we believe that the medical community and the general population recognize thatEmerald IL nor was it is not only vital to monitor the skin on a regular basis, but it also important to have new means of diagnosing skin lesions more rapidly and accurately. One of the best early indicators of Melanoma is a new or changing mole. If detected in its early stage, Melanoma is almost always treatable. If left untreated for too long, skin Melanoma can become terminal and very difficult or virtually impossible to treat. In addition, if the skin is not monitored on a regular basis, it may be difficult for the patient or doctor to detect new moles or identify changes in existing ones.

Total body photography or TBP, which is part of the procedure used with our DermaCompare technology, is intended for use in detecting and monitoring skin moles and lesions, particularly for individuals considered at high risk for Melanoma. Early detection improves treatment and survival and increases the chance of a full recovery. Our DermaCompare application software is designed to assist dermatologists and other medical practitioners in diagnosing Melanoma quickly and with less effort.

Moreover, the use of computerized technologies with our DermaCompare provides an opportunity to compile, process and store data, thereby creating an extensive database for treating physicians as well as medical researchers. Availability of the data in Internet based SaaS and cloud networks can also provide cross linking between dermatologists, general physicians and/or oncologists.

We believe that this should help to alleviate the relative limited availability or even complete unavailability of suitable data in certain regions and for certain populations and may shed light on skin lesion development into Melanoma.

Our DermaCompare Solution

Our DermaCompare imaging solution is provided as a software platform aimed at early detection of Melanoma based on ABCD Rule for classification of dermatological lesions as published by the National Institute of Health ("NIH") for analysis of moles. The ABCD Rule is defined as follows:

A ●Asymmetry, a benign mole that is notasymmetrical;
B● Border, a benign mole has smooth, evenborders, unlike melanomas;
C● Color. Most benign moles are all onecolor, often a single shade of brown; and
D● Diameter.

Benign moles usually have a smaller diameter than malignant ones.Our software processes and analyzes derma images of skin lesions, moles or total body images. Our DermaCompare imaging software solution is able to read and extract data from those images and in essence turning digital camera, camera-equipped smart phones and tablets into virtual scanning devices.

Our imaging software can be installed on any desktop computer, smart phone or tablet with either iOS or Android operating systems. The software’s imaging capabilities include image recognition, repair and optimization, dynamic data extraction and several image-specific capabilities.

Our proprietary DermaCompare software combines our core image character recognition technology with advanced image processing capabilities that transform a color skin photograph or total body photograph into a digital imageraise additional capital after its issuance of various sizes and resolutions. Photographs taken by digital cameras or photographs of skin lesions captured by camera-equipped smart phones and tablets are exposedconvertible notes to variable lighting conditions and various angles and focal distances. Raw photos of skin lesions taken by a camera-equipped smart phone or tablet may be of an unknown size and resolution and may often be geometrically distorted, skewed or warped. As a result, an unedited mobile image of a skin lesion may be virtually unusable without the use of our DermaCompare imaging technology.

Our DermaCompare software solution uses advanced algorithms designed to identify and correct geometric and optical distortions and automatically correct each image, zoom in and manipulate both new and old images simultaneously in a corresponding manner to facilitate correct and timely diagnosis. In addition, our DermaCompare software is designed to enable dermatologists and other medical practitioners to review the skin lesion images and digital processing results in a graphical and analytic way.

These images can then be stored on our managed cloud-based servers and our licensee/users will be able to safely access their patients’ images via mobile access or Internet login. We believe that our central image storage solution insures that images and data are secured and kept confidential. We are compliant with HIPAA, the United States Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, sets the standard for protecting sensitive patient data. Any company that deals with protected health information must ensure that all the required physical, network, and process security measures are in place and followed.

This includes covered entities, anyone who provides treatment, payment and operations in healthcare, and business associates, anyone with access to patient information and provides support in treatment, payment or operations. Subcontractors, or business associates of business associates, must also be in compliance. Emerald has recently been as a HIPAA compliant company and also using the IBM SoftLayer cloud that already HIPAA compliance.

Practice and Pricing

Our pricing will be based on a fixed-price model, which fees will be charged directly by the App or collected either by the dermatologists, other physicians or medical centers. The process will start with the dermatologist or medical center charging the patient for the total body photography and upload the images through the Internet to a secure, company-owned server. We will invoice the dermatologist or medical center directly on a monthly, per-patient basis. If a patient is to be found to have Melanoma, our pricing model is to waive the fee for this particular patient. We believe that this should serve to incentivize physicians to use our DermaCompare software and encourage patient acceptance of its use.

Our physician/licensees can add new patient accounts to their online account and, at present, our pricing model contemplates that each patient registration will cost US$95 annually.

We will offer our dermatologist/licensees unlimited access to their patients’ imagesinstitution investors during the one-year period. Each registered patient will also receive a user2nd and password to enable secure access to his/her images through the website or mobile access and enable any other physician to review the images with that patient’s consent ("2nd opinion" model).

We believe that our pricing strategy should make us competitive and is based on the fact that we do not plan on being directly engaged with the end-user and taking and transmitting images to the server. Our strategy is to provide imaging software as a service to dermatologists and medical centers that analyze their own patient’s images.

Maintenance and Product Support

We plan to provide ongoing software support services to assist our medical professional licensees with answers to technical questions and will also maintain customer service department for support with respect to DermaCompare software installation and system maintenance. The majority3rd fiscal quarters of the inquiries that we expect to receive will be handled by us via telephone and email. We will maintain our licensees’ software largely through online releases via the Internet that may be downloaded by our licensees with technology enhancements and updated software features. We plan to offer our licensees post-contract support. All of these services are expected to generate significant recurring revenues and shall be typically offered under contract on an annual basis.

Maintenance and support service fees will be deferred and recognized over the contract period on a straight-line basis. Costs incurred by us to provide maintenance and support services will be charged to cost of revenue as incurred.

Intellectual Property

Our success will in large part depend upon our ability to protect our proprietary DermaCompare technology. We plan to protect our intellectual property rights primarily through patents, copyrights, trademarks, trade secrets, employee and third party nondisclosure agreements and other measures.

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property or our intellectual property infringes, for any reason that we do not presently contemplate, on the intellectual property rights of a third party, our operating results would, in all likelihood be materially, adversely affected.

To date, we have not filed for domestic and international patents. Further, we have no registered trademarks, but will continue to evaluate advisability and the costs associated with the registration of trademarks as our management deems appropriate, from time to time.

Sales and Marketing Strategy

Our sales and marketing plan, which has already commenced, is to sell licenses for our DermaCompare imaging software to: NHSs, HMOs, health insurance companies, hospitals and medical clinics through distributers, health care channel partners or directly through independent salespersons and/or web purchase to dermatologists and other physicians (GPs) that we expect to purchase licenses based on the number of potential numbers of patients.

Initially, our marketing strategy for our product is based on a pilot program with worldwide leading dermatologists and medical centers in Israel and Europe in order to improve our DermaCompare software application further.

Subsequently, we plan to market our product worldwide through channel partners, via the Internet as well as through our direct sales force.

We intent to have an internal marketing group that develops our product marketing strategies and executes marketing plans with the support of external resources as needed. We will employ a technically oriented sales force that works with management to identify prospective customers.

Our indirect sales strategy concentrates on distributors and software solution companies that build, integrate and sell software solutions.

Our direct sales strategy will concentrate on health insurance companies, NHS, HMOs, medical centers, dermatologists and other physicians that want to provide our software to their patients. Our sales process will additionally be supported by a broad range of marketing programs, including trade shows, public relations and digital advertising.

In addition, we plan to utilize the following low-cost methods in order to maximize our marketing budget, such as:

 Internet promotion to support public relationships.
 Publicity adds at pools, golf clubs and beaches.
 Collaborating with leading companies that manufacture sun-screen lotions, swimming-suits, etc.
 Taking advantage of public awareness at special opportunities through product placements.
 Social networking, utilizing web sites for PR needs.
 Presentation at scientific and medical conferences and highly publicized patient organization meetings.

Competition

The market for derma image processing software products is intensely competitive, subject to rapid change, and significantly affected by new product introductions and other market activities of industry participants. We face direct and indirect competition from a broad range of competitors who offer a variety of competitive products and solutions to our target markets. Our principal competition will come from: (i) manufacturers of custom-developed solutions; (ii) companies offering automated derma imaging processing systems; and (iii) companies offering competing technologies capable of recognizing and analyzing derma images. Many, if not all of these competing companies will have far greater financial and other resources, established name recognition and lengthy operating histories, any of which could make it difficult for us to compete effectively.

It is also possible that we will face competition from new industry participants and/or alternative technologies. Moreover, as the market for derma imaging software further evolves and develops, a number of companies with significantly greater resources than we have could attempt to enter or increase their presence in our industry, either independently or by acquiring or forming strategic alliances with our competitors, or otherwise increase their focus on the industry. In addition, current and potential competitors have established or may establish cooperative relationships among themselves or with third parties to increase the ability of their products to address the needs of our potential customers.

Our DermaCompare product competes, to various degrees, with products produced by a number of substantial competitors, many of which have far greater financial and other resources and established operating histories with name recognition. Competition among product providers in this market generally focuses on price, accuracy, reliability and technical support. We believe our primary competitive advantages in this market are: (i) flexibility resulting from the ability of our product to operate in Internet based web services environments; (ii) an architectural software design that allows our product to be more readily modified, improved with added functionality and configured for new products, thereby allowing our software to be easily upgraded ; and (iii) combined methodologies of "Big Data and wisdom of the crowd" (which meansanalyzing tens of thousands of electronic medical records, whereby investigators can uncover new risk factors, novel preventive measures and treatments that are the most effective for a range of diseases and conditions)with machine learning and artificial intelligence together with high end machine vision capabilities.2016.

 

As a result, we believeon September 1, 2017, the Registrant filed a Form 8-K reporting that our DermaCompare software Product should differ substantially from what is currently availableit had entered into a settlement agreement with two of the institutional investors pursuant to which the Registrant agreed to the amendment and revision of the terms of the convertible notes (the “Notes”) and the warrants (the “Warrants”) originally dated June 20, 2016. The institutional investors had alleged that the Registrant was in default and in order to cure any alleged defaults, the Registrant agreed that the Notes, which had originally provided for a maturity date of June 19, 2017 and were in the marketoriginal principal amounts of $400,000 and heretofore has been known as "gold standard." Imaging and analytics is a major sector$40,000, respectively, were extended until June 19, 2019, in consideration for which the Registrant agreed to an increase in the medical device industryprincipal amounts to of the Notes to $551,600 and competition is expected$55,160, respectively, with an adjusted conversion price of $0.14. In addition, the Registrant agreed that the Warrants issued on June 20, 2016 be adjusted to be broad-based and intense. Increased competition may result inprovide for the exercise of a total of 11,331,252 shares at $0.14 compared to the exercise of 2,200,000 shares each at the adjusted conversion price reductions, reduced gross margins and loss of market share, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

The following list of competitors is not intended to be exhaustive, and there are other existing competitors and there likely will be new potential competitors$0.14 in the future:original Warrants. The new Notes and Warrants were filed as exhibits to the Form 8-K filed on September 1, 2017.

During 2017, the Registrant filed several Forms 8-K with disclosure under Item 5.02 reporting terminations and/or resignations of members of its management and Board of Directors. After the year-ended December 31, 2017, the only member of Registrant’s Board of Directors that had been a director in 2017 was Mr. Yair Fudim, formerly an independent director since April 2015. On February 15, 2018, the Registrant filed a Form 8-K reporting the resignation of Mr. Ahmed Alimi as Chairman and CEO and the appointment of Mr. Fudim as Chairman and CEO. This change in the Registrant’s Board of Directors was in connection with the cessation of the operations of Emerald IL and the commencement of operations of Virtual Crypto Israel.

 

DermAlert:The DermAlert software, as presently constituted, is designed to compare images taken by digital camera obtained during a 6 to 12 month period in order to detect new or changing moles through total body photography, by monitoring a specific mole or moles. We believe that their software, at present, cannot define whether a mole is a new one or not.ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

 

Canfield Scientific: Canfield Scientific provides custom photographic systems, image monitoring and centralized analysis services for the pharmaceutical, biotechnology and cosmetics industries. Canfield software is a local based installation and is also expensive to purchase and for this reason is not truly competitive with our DermaCompare software.

DigitalDerm:DigitalDerm’s MoleMap CD technology is a baseline system for early Melanoma detection. Their technology is unique in that it combines total body photography and patented software into a CD-based imaging record that runs on any personal computer with a Windows-based operating system. DigitalDerm’s MoleMap CD applies 35 images as a baseline to compare new moles and moles that are changing or have changed and is based on a local DB, which is considered on older, conventional manually-based solution, not using the "wisdom of the crowd"

FotoFinder Systems:FotoFinder Systems’ Dermoscope is a system for digital dermoscopy, fluorescence diagnosis and standardized photo documentation in dermatology. We do not believe that any of these technologies are used by or are competitive with our DermaCompare software.

Notwithstanding our determination that the above-referenced companies are not actual competitors with our DermaCompare technology, they all have substantially far greater capital, marketing, personnel and other resources, and greater experience in commercializing products and services than we have.

Government Regulation

The Company’s DermaCompare software Product and systems are not subject to FDA or other governmental approval. Any change in current regulatory requirements or related interpretations by or the positions of, governmental agencies, federal or state officials where we plan to market out product could adversely affect our operations.

Employees

Mr. Lior Wyan, CEO and director, and Mr. Oded Gilboa, CFO, constitute our Management team. Mr. Yair Fudim is the Chairman of our board of directors. They are not obligated to contribute any specific number of hours per week to our operations and intend to devote only as much time as they deem necessary to the Company’s affairs until such time that we begin marketing our products and generate revenues. We have entered into employment agreements with Lior Wayn and with Oded Gilboa, Emerald’s CEO and CFO, respectively. Reference is made to the disclosure under Item 11. "Executive Compensation" which contains a summary of the material terms of the respective employment agreements.

At present, Emerald has 10 employees including its CEO, Lior Wayn.


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORSBack to Table of Contents

The shares of our Common Stock are highly speculative in nature, involve a high degree of risk and should be purchased only by persons who can afford to lose their entire amount invested in the Common Stock. Accordingly, prospective investors should carefully consider, along with other matters referred to herein, the following risk factors in evaluating our business before purchasing any shares of Common Stocks. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition or operating results could be materially adversely affected. In such case, you may lose all or part of your investment. You should carefully consider the risks described below and the other information in this Prospectus before investing in our Common Stock. Prospective investors should also carefully consider the fact that several of the risk factors related to our former DermaCompare business are no longer applicable and that there are new risk factors applicable to our new business operations.

Risks Associated Withwith Our Business

 

Our Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm has expressed substantial doubt asWe recently discontinued our former operations related to our patented DermaCompare technology designed for early detection of skin cancer.

At the end of January 2018, we transferred the ordinary shares of our former Israeli subsidiary, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. (“Emerald IL”) to a trustee for thepurpose liquidating Emerald IL’s shares and/or the assets of Emerald IL to satisfy its debts. The operations of Emerald IL never generated any revenues and the Registrant was unable to raise capital to fund its ongoing operations and satisfy its financial obligations to former employees.

We have only recently commenced operations in the business of developing and marketing software and hardware products facilitating, allowing and supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices and, as a result, have no history of operations in such business.

On January 17, 2018, we organized Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd. as a new, wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary (Virtual Crypto IL to develop and market software and hardware products facilitating, allowing and supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices (the “Products”). We only recently commenced these new business activities and have virtually no history of operations in developing and marketing the Products.

Our historical financial information does not reflect our new business activities nor our recent agreement to distribute our Products.

As a result, our historic operations do not provide any basis for an evaluation of our business or our current business operations or focus. Our prospects must be considered in light of the uncertainties, risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered by companies in their early stages of operations in new and developing fields such manufacturing and marketing Products for the purchase and sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and mobile devices. We may expect to incur additional net losses over the next several years as we seek to develop our operations in the field of supporting the purchase and sale of cryptocurrencies using our Products. The amount of future losses and when, if ever, we will achieve profitability are uncertain. If we are unsuccessful at executing on our business plan, our business, prospects, and results of operations may be materially adversely affected.

We have an evolving business model.

As blockchain technologies and cryptocurrencies become more widely available and utilized, we expect the services and products associated with them to evolve and, as a result our Products will have to continue to evolve. Very recently, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued a Report that promoters that use initial coin offerings or token sales to raise capital may be engaged in the offer and sale of securities in violation of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”). While we are not involved, nor will we engage in the business of initial coin offerings or token sales, any adverse impact on the cryptocurrency industry that may occur as a result of the recent SEC Report or other potential regulatory actions may adversely impact our ability to successfully market our Products. From time to time we may modify aspects of our business model rand our Products and there can be no assurance that these or any other modifications will be successful or will not result in harm to the business.

5

Our new management team has limited experience in the field of manufacturing and marketing our new Products, which are still in development, to support the cryptocurrency market.

Our management only recently determined to shift our primary corporate focus towards the manufacture and sale of software and hardware Products facilitating, allowing and supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices. Our management has relatively limited experience in supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies and the blockchain technology industry generally. While we intend to expand our management team and staff with individuals with more experience in this industry and will closely scrutinize any individuals we engage, we cannot assure you that well-qualified individuals will be available to us or that our assessment of individuals we retain will prove to be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of being involved in a public company which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with such requirements. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely affect our operations.

The further development and acceptance of cryptocurrency trading, of which there can be no assurance, represents a new and rapidly changing industry.

We will be dependent upon our ability to manufacture and market our Products in a timely manner if we hope to succeed in serving this new and rapidly developing industry. We will be subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of cryptocurrencies and our ability to manufacture products in a timely manner and within the limits of our capital resources may adversely affect an investment in our common stock.

The use of our Products to purchase and sell cryptocurrencies to, among other things, buy and sell goods and services and/or the acquisition of cryptocurrencies as an investment, is part of a new and rapidly evolving industry. There can be no assurance that our Products will be accepted by this new and likely demanding market that employs the use of a computer-generated mathematical and/or cryptographic protocol. The growth of this industry, in general, is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting the further development of this industry, include, but are not limited to:

continued worldwide growth in the adoption and use of cryptocurrencies and the acceptance of our

Products;

changes in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences that can limit demand for our

Products;

the maintenance and development of hardware and software for our Products;
the availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling cryptocurrencies;
general economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to cryptocurrencies; and
negative consumer perception of cryptocurrencies specifically and cryptocurrencies generally.

A decline in the popularity or acceptance of cryptocurrencies would harm our ability to market our Products and, as a result, could adversely impact our ability to generate revenues and profits, if any.

Currently, there is relatively small use of cryptocurrencies in the retail and commercial marketplace in comparison to relatively large use by speculators; as a result, we expect that the market for our Products may develop slowly, if at all.

Cryptocurrencies have only recently become accepted as a means of payment for goods and services by certain major retail and commercial outlets and use of cryptocurrencies by consumers to pay such retail and commercial outlets remains limited. As a result, the demand for our Products may be expected to develop slowly, if at all. As a result, we reasonably anticipate that we will not generate positive cash flow from operations for the foreseeable and there can be no assurance that we will generate profits.

If we do not keep pace with technological changes, our Products, if and when developed, may not become competitive and/or our competitors may develop and market similar products that receive greater market acceptance.

The market for blockchain technology is characterized by rapid technological change, frequent product and service innovation and evolving industry standards. As a result, our Products must be able to keep pace with this rapidly developing and competitive marketplace. There can be no assurance that we will be able to manufacture our Products successfully or, if we can manufacture Products that achieve market acceptance, that we will be able to fulfill demand if such demand exceeds our production capabilities. We expect that we will be dependent on third party manufacturers for the foreseeable future but at present have no firm arrangements for the manufacture of our Products. If we are unable to provide enhancements and new features for our Products and any future product offerings that achieve market acceptance or that keep pace with these technological developments, our business could be adversely affected.

It may be illegal now, or in the future, to acquire, own, hold, sell or use cryptocurrencies and, as a result, the potential use and demand for our Products could be materially adversely affected.

Although currently cryptocurrencies generally are not regulated or are lightly regulated in most countries, including the United States, one or more countries may take regulatory actions in the future that could severely restrict the right to acquire, own, hold, sell or use cryptocurrencies which would adversely impact demand for our Products and/or limit their acceptance by potential users, including locations where we expect to place our Products. Such restrictions may adversely affect the Company. Such circumstances would have a material adverse effect on the ability of the Company to continue as a going concern.concern or to pursue this segment at all, which would have a material adverse effect on the business, prospects or operations of the Company and potentially the value of any cryptocurrencies the Company holds or expects to acquire for its own account and harm investors.

We will be dependent upon our ability to continue to raise equity and/or debt financing at acceptable terms.

 

The audited financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and do not include any adjustments that might result if we cease to continue as a going concern. We believe that in order to continue as a going concern, including the costs of being a public company, we will need approximately $30,000$60,000 per year simply to cover the administrative, legal and accounting fees. We have funded these losses primarily through the sale of restricted shares of our Common Stock and the issuance of convertible notes, which have subsequently been converted into restricted shares of Common Stock.

 

Based on our financial statements for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, our independent registered public accounting firm has expressed substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. To date we have not generated any revenue.

 

Notwithstanding our success in raising $989,974capital raise from the sale of our equity and debt securities duringfollowing the year 2015,formation of Virtual Crypto IL to the present, there can be no assurance that we will have adequate capital resources or be able to continue to raise equity and/or debt capital to fund planned operations or that any additional funds will be available to us when needed or at all, or, if available, will be available on favorable terms or in amounts required by us. If we are unable to obtain adequate capital resources to fund operations, we may be required to delay, scale back or eliminate some or all of our plan of operations, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and ability to operate as a going concern.

 

Our limited operating history does not afford investors a sufficient history on which to base an investment decision.

Our wholly-owned subsidiary was incorporated under the laws of the State of Israel on February 17, 2010 and its DermaCompare was fully launched at the beginning of 2015 and has only recently commenced marketing DermaCompare. We are therefore in the very early stage of our marketing plan for Derma Compare. There can be no assurance at this time that we will be able to operate profitably or that we will have adequate working capital to meet our obligations as they become due. Investors must consider the risks and difficulties frequently encountered by early stage companies, particularly in rapidly evolving markets. Such risks include the following:

competition;
need for acceptance of our product - there can be no assured market for our product and there is no guarantee of orders or of physicians or patient acceptance;
ability to develop a brand identity;
ability to anticipate and adapt to a competitive market;
ability to effectively manage rapidly expanding operations;
amount and timing of operating costs and capital expenditures relating to expansion of our business, operations, and infrastructure; and
dependence upon key personnel to market and sell our product and the loss of one of our key managers may adversely affect the marketing of our product.

We cannot be certain that our business strategy will be successful or that we will successfully address these risks. In the event that we do not successfully address these risks, our business, prospects, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

 

Our former DermaCompare may not be accepted in the marketplace.

Uncertainty exists as to whether our DermaCompare product will be accepted by the market without additional widespread doctor acceptance. A number of factors may limit theoperation never achieved market acceptance of our DermaCompare product, including the availability of alternative products and the price of our DermaCompare product relative to alternative products. There is a risk that dermatologists or other physicians will be encouraged to continue to use other products and/or methods instead of ours. We are assuming that, notwithstanding the fact that our DermaCompare product is new in the market, dermatologists or other physicians will elect to use DermaCompare because it will permit to safe valuable physician’s time and more subjective analysis. While we intend to continue to build and gather data to demonstrate the benefit of our DermaCompare product, this data gathering may not be conclusive or may be viewed as insufficient by potential users such as dermatologists and other physicians.

Patients have to be persuaded that a certain level of intense self-imaging is justified for the anticipated benefit, but there is no assurance that sufficient numbers of patients will be convinced to enable a successful market to develop for our product.

Ournor were any revenues will be dependent upon acceptance of our DermaCompare product by the market.ever generated. The failure of such acceptance will causecaused us to curtail or cease operations.our DermaCompare operation and divest our DermaCompare subsidiary in January 2018.

Our revenues arewere expected to come from the sale of our onethe DermaCompare product. As a result, we will continuecontinued to incur operating losses until such time as salesour new management and Board of Directors determined to divest the DermaCompare subsidiary. We are now dependent upon our DermaCompare product reaches a mature levelability to successfully manufacture, via third-party agreements, to develop and we are able to generate sufficient revenues frommarket our planned Products implementing software and hardware facilitating, allowing and supporting the purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices (collectively, our DermaCompare product to meet our operating expenses. There can be no assurance that dermatologists or other physicians will adopt our DermaCompare product. In the event that we are not able to market and significantly increase the number of dermatologists or other physicians that purchase our DermaCompare product, or if we are unable to charge the necessary prices, our financial condition and results of operations will be materially and adversely affected.“Products”)

 

Defects or malfunctionsOur new Products will be dependent upon software still in our product could hurt our reputation, sales and profitability.

Our business and the level of customer acceptance of our DermaCompare product depend upon the effective and reliable operation of our one DermaCompare product. Our DermaCompare product is complex and is continually being modified and improved, and as such may contain undetected defects or errors when first introduced or as new versions are released. To the extent that defects or errors cause our DermaCompare product to malfunction and our customers’ use of our DermaCompare product is interrupted, our reputation could suffer and our potential revenues could decline or be delayed while such defects are remedied. We may also be subject to liability for the defects and malfunctions.

There can be no assurance that, despite our testing, errors will not be found in our DermaCompare product or new releases, resulting in loss of future revenues or delay in market acceptance, diversion of development resources, damage to our reputation, adverse litigation, or increased service and warranty costs, any of which would have a material adverse effect upon our business, operating results and financial condition.

development; Software failures, breakdowns in the operations of our servers and communications systems or the failure to implement system enhancements could harm our business.

 

Our success depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our servers and communications systems.system, all of which are still in early stages of development. A failure of our network or data gathering procedures could impede the processing of data, delivery of databases and services, client data and day-to-day management of our business and could result in the corruption or loss of data. While we plan that all of our operations will have disaster recovery plans in place, theysuch plans, when in place, might not adequately protect us. Despiteus and any precautions we take,failure could irreparably damage from fire, floods, hurricanes, power loss, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, break-ins and similar events at our computer facilities could result in interruptions in the flow of data to our servers and from our servers to our clients.any efforts for establishing a successful market presence. In addition, any failure by our computer environment to provide our required data communications capacity could result in interruptions in our service. In the event of a server failure, weservice, which could be requiredexpected to transferprevent us from achieving any market acceptance for our client data collection operations to an alternative provider of server hosting services. Such a transfer could result in delays in our ability to deliver our products and services to our clients.new Products.

 

Additionally, significant delays in the planned delivery of system enhancements, improvements and inadequate performance of the systems once they are completed could damage our reputation and harm our business. Long-term disruptions in the infrastructure caused by events such as natural disasters, the outbreak of war, the escalation of hostilities and acts of terrorism, particularly involving cities in which we have offices, could adversely affect our businesses. Although, we plan to carry property and business interruption insurance for our business operations, our coverage might not be adequate to compensate us for all losses that may occur.

 

We face risks related to the storage of customers’ and their end users’ confidential and proprietary information.

 

Our DermaCompare product isProducts are being designed to maintain the confidentiality and security of our customers’ and their end users’ confidential and proprietary data that are stored on our server systems, which may include sensitive personal data. However, any accidental or willful security breaches or other unauthorized access to these data could expose us to liability for the loss of such information, time-consuming and expensive litigation and other possible liabilities as well as negative publicity. Techniques used to obtain unauthorized access or to sabotage systems change frequently and generally are difficult to recognize and react to. We may be unable to anticipate these techniques or implement adequate preventative or reactionary measures.measures.

 

We might incur substantial expense to further develop our derma DermaCompare product that, once commercialized, may never become sufficiently successful.

Our growth strategy requires the successful launch of our DermaCompare product. Although management will take every precaution to ensure that our DermaCompare product will, with a high degree of likelihood, achieve commercial success, there can be no assurance that this will be the case. The causes for failure of our DermaCompare product once commercialized can be numerous, including:

market demand for our DermaCompare product proves to be smaller than we expect;
competitive products with superior performance either on the market or commercialized at the same time or soon after;
further DermaCompare product development turns out to be more costly than anticipated or takes longer;
our DermaCompare product requires significant adjustment post commercialization, rendering the DermaCompare product uneconomic or extending considerably the likely investment return period;
additional regulatory requirements which extend the time to launch our DermaCompare product increase the overall costs of the development;
patent conflicts or unenforceable intellectual property rights; and
Dermatologists and other physicians may be unwilling to adopt and/or use our DermaCompare product.

Compliance with changing regulations concerning corporate governance and public disclosure may result in additional expenses.

 

In recent years, there have been several changes in laws, rules, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act"“Dodd-Frank Act”), the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 ("Sarbanes-Oxley"(“Sarbanes-Oxley”) and various other new regulations promulgated by the SEC and rules promulgated by the national securities exchanges.

The Dodd-Frank Act, enacted in July 2010, expands federal regulation of corporate governance matters and imposes requirements on publicly-held companies, including us, to, among other things, provide stockholders with a periodic advisory vote on executive compensation and also adds compensation committee reforms and enhanced pay-for-performance disclosures. While some provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act were effective upon enactment, others will be implemented upon the SEC’s adoption of related rules and regulations. The scope and timing of the adoption of such rules and regulations is uncertain and accordingly, the cost of compliance with the Dodd-Frank Act is also uncertain.

 

In addition, Sarbanes-Oxley specifically requires, among other things, that we maintain effective internal control over financial reporting and disclosure of controls and procedures. In particular, we must perform system and process evaluation and testing of our internal control over financial reporting to allow management to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, as required by Section 404 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act ("(“Section 404"404”), and our independent registered public accounting firm is required to attest to our internal control over financial reporting.

 

Our testing, or the subsequent testing by our independent registered public accounting firm may reveal deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses. Our compliance with Section 404 will require that we incur substantial accounting expenses and expend significant management efforts. We currently have limited internal audit capabilities and will need to hire additional accounting and financial staff with appropriate public company experience and technical accounting knowledge. Moreover, if we are not able to comply with the requirements of Section 404 in a timely manner, or if we or our independent registered public accounting firm identifies deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting that are deemed to be material weaknesses, the market price of our stock could decline, and we could be subject to sanctions or investigations by the SEC or other regulatory authorities, which would require additional financial and management resources.

 

These and other new or changed laws, rules, regulations and standards are, or will be, subject to varying interpretations in many cases due to their lack of specificity. As a result, their application in practice may evolve over time as new guidance is provided by regulatory and governing bodies, which could result in continuing uncertainty regarding compliance matters and higher costs necessitated by ongoing revisions to disclosure and governance practices. Our efforts to comply with evolving laws, regulations and standards are likely to continue to result in increased general and administrative expenses and a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities to compliance activities. Further, compliance with new and existing laws, rules, regulations and standards may make it more difficult and expensive for us to maintain director and officer liability insurance, and we may be required to accept reduced coverage or incur substantially higher costs to obtain coverage. Members of our board of directors and our principal executive officer and principal financial officer could face an increased risk of personal liability in connection with the performance of their duties. As a result, we may have difficulty attracting and retaining qualified directors and executive officers, which could harm our business. We continually evaluate and monitor regulatory developments and cannot estimate the timing or magnitude of additional costs we may incur as a result.

We cannot be certain that we will obtain patents for our DermaCompare product and technology or that such patents will protect us from competitors.

We believe that our success and competitive position will depend in part on our ability to obtain and maintain patents for our DermaCompare product, which is both costly and time consuming. We still are in the process to evaluate the patent potentials of our DermaCompare product. Patent Offices typically requires 12-24 months or more to process a patent application. There can be no assurance that any of our potential patent applications will be approved. However, we have decided to launch our DermaCompare product without patent protection. There can be no assurance that any potential patent issued or licensed to us will provide us with protection against competitive products, protect us against changes in industry trends which we have may not have anticipated or otherwise protect the commercial viability of our product, or that challenges will not be instituted against the validity or enforceability of any of our future patents or, if instituted, that such challenges will not be successful. The cost of litigation to uphold the validity of a patent and enforce it against infringement can be substantial. Even issued patents may later be modified or revoked by the Patent and Trademark Office or in legal proceedings. Patent applications in the United States are maintained in secrecy until the patent issues and, since publication of patents tends to lag behind actual discoveries, we cannot be certain that if we obtain patents for our product, we were the first creator of the inventions covered by a pending patent applications or the first to file patent applications on such inventions.

DermaCompare product liability is inherent in the medical devices industry and insurance is expensive and difficult to obtain, we may be exposed to large lawsuits.

Our business exposes us to potential product liability risks, which are inherent in the marketing and sale of medical devices. While we will take precautions we deem to be appropriate to avoid product liability suits against us, there can be no assurance that we will be able to avoid significant product liability exposure. DermaCompare product liability insurance for the medical products industry is generally expensive. We plan to obtain product liability professional indemnity insurance coverage for our DermaCompare product. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain such coverage on acceptable terms, or that any insurance policy will provide adequate protection against potential claims. A successful product liability claim brought against us may exceed any insurance coverage secured by us and could have a material adverse effect on our results or ability to continue marketing our product.

We also plan to obtain Directors and Officers Liability Insurance and certain commercial and personal property insurance.

We may have to establish a reserve funds for potential warranty claims. If we experience warranty claims or if our repair and replacement costs associated with warranty claims will increase significantly, it would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.

We may need to raise additional capital to fund continuing operations and an inability to raise the necessary capital or to do so on acceptable terms could threaten the success of our business.

We currently anticipate that our available capital resources will be sufficient to meet our expected working capital and capital expenditure requirements for the twelve-month ended December 31, 2016. We anticipate that we will require an additional $1.5 million during the next twelve months to fulfill our business plan. However, such resources may not be sufficient to fund the long-term growth of our business. If we determine that it is necessary to raise additional funds, we may choose to do so through strategic collaborations, licensing arrangements, public or private equity or debt financing, a bank line of credit, or other arrangements.

We cannot be sure that any additional funding will be available on terms favorable to us or at all. Any additional equity financing may be dilutive to our stockholders, new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our shares of common stock. Debt or equity financing may subject us to restrictive covenants and significant interest costs. If we obtain funding through a strategic collaboration or licensing arrangement, we may be required to relinquish our rights to our product or marketing territories. If we are unable to obtain the financing necessary to support our operations, we may be required to defer, reduce or eliminate certain planned expenditures or significantly curtail our operations.

We will need to increase the size of our organization and may experience difficulties in managing growth.growth, if any.

At present, we are a small company. We expect to experience a period of expansion in headcount, infrastructure and overhead and anticipate that further expansion will be required to address potential growth and market opportunities. Future growth will impose significant added responsibilities on members of management, including the need to identify, recruit, maintain and integrate new managers. Our future financial performance and its ability to compete effectively will depend, in part, on its ability to manage any future growth effectively.

 

The loss of key personnel could adversely affect our business. We may not be able to hire and retain qualified personnel to support our growth.

Emerald’s

The Company’s success depends to a significant extent upon the efforts of Mr. Lior Wayn, its CEO, and other key senior employees and other key personnel. The loss of the services of such personnel could adversely affect our business and our ability to implement our growth plan. We cannot assure you that the services of the members of our management team will continue to be available to us, or that we will be able to find a suitable replacement for any of them. We do not have key man insurance on any members of our management team. If any member of our management team were to die and we are unable to replace either or both of them for a prolonged period of time, we may be unable to carry out our long termlong-term business plan and our future prospect for growth, and our business, may be harmed.

 

OurOur success is dependent upon our ability to attract, train, manage and retain sales, marketing and other qualified personnel. There is substantial competition for qualified personnel, and an inability to recruit or retain qualified personnel may impact our ability to implement our strategy to grow our business.

During 2015, we granted 534,400 options under our ESOP plan at an exercise price ranging between $0.01 and $0.40. As of December 31, 2015, we had 4,149,719 Class A Warrants, 2,500,000 Class B Warrants, 5,072,492 Class C Unit Warrants and 2,700,000 Class E Warrants outstanding. The Class B Warrants and Class C Unit Warrants were issued to Consultants for bona fide services to the Company as discussed in more detail under the subheading "Sales of Unregistered Securities" in "Market For Common Equity and Related Stockholder Matters" below.

 

If we are unable to adopt, implement and maintain equity compensation arrangements that provide sufficient incentives, we may be unable to hire and retain our existing employees and attract additional qualified candidates.candidates in the future. If we are unable to hire and retain our existing employees, including qualified technical personnel, and attract additional qualified candidates, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Some of our competitors are more established and better capitalized than we are and we may be unable to establish market share.

Some of our competitors are well known, more established and better capitalized than we are. As such, they may have at their disposal greater marketing strength and economies of scale and, as they may have additional products which they sell to the same customers, have greater presence with these customer. They may also have more resources to expend on research and development to create more innovative products in competition with ours. Competition will also likely increase as or when the cost benefits of the Company’s DermaCompare product are established and proven. Accordingly, we may not be successful in competing with them for market share.

We may license or collaborate with third parties in various potential markets.

We believe collaboration will allow us to leverage our resources and to access new markets while avoiding the cost of establishing or maintaining a direct sales force in each market. We may incur significant costs in the use of third parties to identify and assist in establishing relationships with potential collaborators. We currently have no direct sales force. We plan to sell our DermaCompare product first in the dermatology market in Israel, and we intend to slowly later expand geographically in the US and Europe.

To penetrate our target markets, we may need to enter into collaborative agreements to assist in the commercialization of our DermaCompare product. We may choose to license our DermaCompare product for distribution to a third party as opposed to pursuing commercialization ourselves. Establishing strategic collaborations is difficult and time-consuming. Potential collaborators may reject collaborations based upon their assessment of our financial or intellectual property position and our internal capabilities. Discussions with potential collaborators may not lead to the establishment of collaboration agreements on favorable terms and may have the potential to provide collaborators with access to our key intellectual property. We may have limited control over the amount and timing of resources that any future collaborators devote to our DermaCompare product. These collaborators may breach or terminate their agreements with us or otherwise fail to conduct their collaborative activities successfully and in a timely manner. By entering into collaboration, we may preclude opportunities to collaborate with other third parties who do not wish to associate with our existing third party strategic partners. Moreover, in the event of termination of a collaboration agreement, termination negotiations may result in less favorable terms.

Our future sales in international markets will subject us to foreign currency exchange and other risks and costs which could harm our business.

 

We expect that a substantial portion of our future revenues will be derived from outside Israel; primarily the US and Europe.Israel. We will be subject to the effects of exchange rate fluctuations. Our functional currency is the Israel Shekel. For the preparation of our consolidated financial statements, the financial results are translated into U.S. dollars using average exchange rates during the applicable period. If the U.S. dollar appreciates against the Shekel, as applicable, the revenues we recognize from sales will be adversely impacted. Foreign exchange gains or losses as a result of exchange rate fluctuations in any given period could harm our operating results and negatively impact our revenues. Additionally, if the effective price of our products were to increase as a result of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates, demand for our DermaCompare products could decline and adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.

 

We intend not to use hedging strategies to help offset the effect of fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates. Movements in foreign currency exchange rates could impact our financial results positively or negatively in one period and not another, making it more difficult to compare our financial results from period to period.

 

The healthcare industry is subject to changing policies and procedures, we may find it difficult to continue to compete in an uncertain environment.

The health care industry is subject to changing political, economic and regulatory influences that may affect the procurement practices and operations of healthcare industry participants. During the past several years government regulation of the healthcare industry has changed significantly in several countries. Healthcare industry participants may react to new policies by curtailing or deferring use of new products, including our DermaCompare product. This could substantially impair our ability to successfully market our DermaCompare product, which would have a material adverse effect on our business prospects.

The market success of our DermaCompare product may be dependent in part upon third-party reimbursement policies that are often subject to change.

Our ability to successfully penetrate the market with our DermaCompare product may, to some extent, depend on the availability of reimbursement to individuals for using our DermaCompare product from third-party payers, such as governmental programs, private insurance and private health plans. There is no guarantee that users of our DermaCompare product get reimbursed or that a change in the future of levels of reimbursement to individuals and hospitals, if any, will be high enough to allow us to charge a reasonable profit margin. If levels of reimbursement are decreased in the future, the demand for our DermaCompare product could diminish or our ability to sell our DermaCompare products on a profitable basis could be adversely affected.

We may not be able to successfully expand our business through acquisitions.

We review corporate and product line acquisition candidates as a part of our growth strategy. If we decided to undertake an acquisition, we may not be able to successfully integrate it in order to realize the full benefit of such acquisition. Factors which may affect our ability to grow successfully through acquisitions include:

 

inability to identify suitable targets given the relatively narrow scope of our business;
inability to obtain acquisition or additional working capital financing due to our financial condition;
difficulties and expenses in connection with integrating the acquired companies and achieving the expected benefits;
diversion of management’s attention from current operations;
the possibility that we may be adversely affected by risk factors facing the acquired companies;
acquisitions could be dilutive to earnings, or in the event of acquisitions made through the issuance of our common shares to the shareholders of the acquired company, dilutive to our existing shareholders;
potential losses resulting from undiscovered liabilities of acquired companies not covered by the indemnification we may obtain from the seller; and
loss of key employees of the acquired companies.

 

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

 

Shares issuable upon the conversion of warrants may substantially increase the number of Shares available for sale in the public market and depress the price of our stock.

 

As of December 31, 2015,2017, we had outstanding: (i) Class A Warrants exercisable to purchase 4,149,7196,334,626 shares of Common Stock at an exercise price of $0.80between $0.14-$0.80 per Share for twoone years; (ii) Class B Warrants exercisable to purchase 2,500,0005,400,478 Shares at an exercise price of $0.40$0.14 per Share on a cashless basis for a period of twofive years; (iii) Class C Unit Warrants are exercisable to purchase 5,072,492 units at an exercise price of $0.40, each unit consisting of one share of Common Stock and one Class A Warrant at an exercise price of $0.80, for a period of ninety (90) days commencing ninety (90) days after the effective date of our Registration Statement; and (ii)(iii) Class E Warrants exercisable to purchase 2,700,000 Shares, in three equal tranches of 900,000 Shares, at an exercise price of $0.0001 per Share.

To the extent any of these Warrants are exercised and any additional warrants are granted and subsequently exercised, there will be further dilution to stockholders. Until the warrants expire, these warrant holders will have an opportunity to profit from any increase in the market price of our Shares without assuming the risks of ownership. Holders of options and warrants may exercise these securities at a time when we could obtain additional capital on terms more favorable.

The exercise price of the warrants will dilute the voting interest of the owners of presently outstanding shares by adding a substantial number of additional Shares of our Common Stock. We have reserved Shares of Common Stock for issuance upon the exercise of the warrants and may increase the Shares reserved for these purposes in the future.

The Shares of our Common Stock which are issuable upon the exercise of any outstanding warrants may be sold in the public market pursuant to Rule 144, if applicable. The sale of our common stock issued or issuable upon the exercise of the warrants and options described above, or the perception that such sales could occur, may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

We are subject to compliance with securities law, which exposes us to potential liabilities, including potential rescission rights.

We have offered and sold our Common Stock to investors pursuant to certain exemptions from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as well as those of various state securities laws. The basis for relying on such exemptions is factual; that is, the applicability of such exemptions depends upon our conduct and that of those persons contacting prospective investors and making the offering. We have not received a legal opinion to the effect that any of our prior offerings were exempt from registration under any federal or state law. Instead, we have relied upon the operative facts as the basis for such exemptions, including information provided by investors themselves.

If any prior offering did not qualify for such exemption, an investor would have the right to rescind its purchase of the securities if it so desired. It is possible that if an investor should seek rescission, such investor would succeed. A similar situation prevails under state law in those states where the securities may be offered without registration in reliance on the partial preemption from the registration or qualification provisions of such state statutes. If investors were successful in seeking rescission, we would face severe financial demands that could adversely affect our business and operations. Additionally, if we did not in fact qualify for the exemptions upon which it has relied, we may become subject to significant fines and penalties imposed by the SEC and state securities agencies.

 

Our Executive Officers, Directors and the Chief Executive Officer of Emerald own over 29.4% of our common stock and may be able to influence the outcome of stockholder votes and their interests may differ from other stockholders.

As of March 31, 2016, our executive officers and directors beneficially own 7,002,868 Shares of our Common Stock representing approximately 37.6% of our outstanding Shares, excluding Shares underlying the Class E Warrants, the exercise of which are subject to certain Milestones which are not expected to be reached within 60 days. Subject to any fiduciary duties owed to our other stockholders under Delaware law, these stockholders may be able to exercise significant influence over matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, and will have some control over our management and policies. Some of these persons may have interests that are different from yours. For example, these stockholders may support proposals and actions with which you may disagree. The concentration of ownership could delay or prevent a change in control of the Company or otherwise discourage a potential acquirer from attempting to obtain control of the Company, which in turn could reduce the price of our stock. In addition, these stockholders could use their voting influence to maintain our existing management and directors in office, delay or prevent changes in control of the Company, or support or reject other management and board proposals that are subject to stockholder approval, such as amendments to our employee stock plans and approvals of significant financing transactions.

The availability of a large number of authorized but unissued shares of Common Stock may, upon their issuance, lead to dilution of existing stockholders.

 

We are authorized to issue 490,000,000 shares of Common Stock, $0.0001 par value per share, of which, as of March 31, 2016, 18,624,461April 16, 2018, 59,206,415 shares of Common Stock were issued and outstanding. Additional shares may be issued by our board of directors without further stockholder approval. The issuance of large numbers of shares, possibly at below market prices, is likely to result in substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders. In addition, issuances of large numbers of shares may adversely affect the market price of our Common Stock.

Our Certificate of Incorporation authorizes 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, $0.0001 par value per share of which none were issued and outstanding as of the date of this registration statement. The board of directors is authorized to provide for the issuance of these unissued shares of preferred stock in one or more series, and to fix the number of shares and to determine the rights, preferences and privileges thereof. Accordingly, the board of directors may issue preferred stock which may convert into large numbers of shares of Common Stock and consequently lead to further dilution of other shareholders.

 

We have never paid cash dividends and do not anticipate doing so in the foreseeable future.

We have never declared or paid cash dividends on our common shares. We currently plan to retain any earnings to finance the growth of our business rather than to pay cash dividends. Payments of any cash dividends in the future will depend on our financial condition, results of operations and capital requirements, as well as other factors deemed relevant by our board of directors.

 

Our Common Stock is subject to the "Penny Stock"“Penny Stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in our stock is limited, which makes transactions in our stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment.

The Securities and Exchange Commission has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a "penny“penny stock," for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

 

That a broker or dealer approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks; and
The broker or dealer receives from the investor a written agreement to the transaction, setting forth the identity and quantity of the penny stock to be purchased.

 

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

 

Obtain financial information and investment experience objectives of the person; and
Make a reasonable determination that the transactions in penny stocks are suitable for that person and the person has sufficient knowledge and experience in financial matters to be capable of evaluating the risks of transactions in penny stocks.

 

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the Commission relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form:

 

Sets forth the basis on which the broker or dealer made the suitability determination; and
That the broker or dealer received a signed, written agreement from the investor prior to the transaction.

 

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the "penny stock"“penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of our Common Stock and cause a decline in the market value of our stock.

 

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. ("FINRA"(“FINRA”) sales practice requirements may limit a shareholder’s ability to buy and sell our Common Stock.

In addition to the "penny stock"“penny stock” rules described above, FINRA has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low pricedlow-priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low pricedlow-priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our Common Stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our stock and have an adverse effect on the market for our shares.

 

Our stock is thinly traded, sale of your holding may take a considerable amount of time.

The shares of our Common Stock are thinly-traded on the OTCQB Market, meaning that the number of persons interested in purchasing our Common Stock at or near bid prices at any given time may be relatively small or non-existent. As a consequence, there may be periods of several days or more when trading activity in our shares is minimal or non-existent, as compared to a seasoned issuer which has a large and steady volume of trading activity that will generally support continuous sales without an adverse effect on share price. We cannot give you any assurance that a broader or more active public trading market for our Common Stock will develop or be sustained, or that current trading levels will be sustained. Due to these conditions, we can give you no assurance that you will be able to sell your shares at or near bid prices or at all if you need money or otherwise desire to liquidate your shares.

 

Shares eligible for future sale may adversely affect the market.

From time to time, certain of our stockholders may be eligible to sell all or some of their shares of Common Stock by means of ordinary brokerage transactions in the open market pursuant to Rule 144 promulgated under the Securities Act, subject to certain limitations. In general, pursuant to amended Rule 144, non-affiliate stockholders may sell freely after six months, subject only to the current public information requirement. Affiliates may sell after six months, subject to the Rule 144 volume, manner of sale (for equity securities), current public information and notice requirements. Any substantial sales of our Common Stock pursuant to Rule 144 may have a material adverse effect on the market price of our Common Stock.

 

If we fail to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting, the price of our Common Stock may be adversely affected.

Our internal control over financial reporting may have weaknesses and conditions that could require correction or remediation, the disclosure of which may have an adverse impact on the price of our Common Stock. We are required to establish and maintain appropriate internal controls over financial reporting. Failure to establish those controls, or any failure of those controls once established, could adversely affect our public disclosures regarding our business, prospects, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, management’s assessment of internal controls over financial reporting may identify weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal controls over financial reporting or other matters that may raise concerns for investors. Any actual or perceived weaknesses and conditions that need to be addressed in our internal control over financial reporting or disclosure of management’s assessment of our internal controls over financial reporting may have an adverse impact on the price of our Common Stock.

 

We are required to comply with certain provisions of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and if we fail to comply in a timely manner, our business could be harmed and our stock price could decline.

 

Rules adopted by the SEC pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 require an annual assessment of internal controls over financial reporting, and for certain issuers an attestation of this assessment by the issuer’s independent registered public accounting firm. The standards that must be met for management to assess the internal controls over financial reporting as effective are evolving and complex, and require significant documentation, testing, and possible remediation to meet the detailed standards.

 

We expect to incur expenses and to devote resources to Section 404 compliance on an ongoing basis. It is difficult for us to predict how long it will take or costly it will be to complete the assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for each year and to remediate any deficiencies in our internal control over financial reporting. As a result, we may not be able to complete the assessment and remediation process on a timely basis. In addition, although attestation requirements by our independent registered public accounting firm are not presently applicable to us, we could become subject to these requirements in the future and we may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any resulting changes to internal controls over financial reporting. In the event that our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer determine that our internal control over financial reporting is not effective as defined under Section 404, we cannot predict how the market prices of our shares will be affected; however, we believe that there is a risk that investor confidence and share value may be negatively affected.

 

11

Our share price could be volatile, and our trading volume may fluctuate substantially.substantially

 

The price of our common shares has been and may in the future continue to be extremely volatile, with the sale price fluctuating from a low of $0.44$0.1 to a high of $2.24 since 2012. Many factors could have a significant impact on the future price of our common shares, including:

 

 our inability to raise additional capital to fund our operations;
 our failure to successfully implement our business objectives and strategic growth plans;
 compliance with ongoing regulatory requirements;
 market acceptance of our product;
 changes in government regulations;
 general economic conditions and other external factors; and
 actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly financial and operating results; and the degree of trading liquidity in our common shares.

 

Our annual and quarterly results may fluctuate, which may cause substantial fluctuations in our common stock price.

 

Our annual and quarterly operating results may in the future fluctuate significantly depending on factors including the timing of purchase orders, new product releases by us and other companies, gain or loss of significant customers, price discounting of our product, the timing of expenditures, product delivery requirements and economic conditions. Revenues related to our product are required to be recognized upon satisfaction of all applicable revenue recognition criteria. The recognition of revenues from our product is dependent on a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the terms of any license agreement and the timing of implementation of our products by our customers.

 

Any unfavorable change in these or other factors could have a material adverse effect on our operating results for a particular quarter or year, which may cause downward pressure on our common stock price. We expect quarterly and annual fluctuations to continue for the foreseeable future.

 

Delaware law contains provisions that could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our company, prevent attempts to replace or remove current management and reduce the market price of our stock.

 

Provisions in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a merger or acquisition involving us that our stockholders may consider favorable. For example, our certificate of incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to ten million shares of "blank check"“blank check” preferred stock. As a result, without further stockholder approval, the board of directors has the authority to attach special rights, including voting and dividend rights, to this preferred stock. With these rights, preferred stockholders could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us.

 

We are also subject to the anti-takeover provisions of the DGCL. Under these provisions, if anyone becomes an "interested“interested stockholder," we may not enter into a "business combination"“business combination” with that person for three years without special approval, which could discourage a third party from making a takeover offer and could delay or prevent a change in control of us. An "interested stockholder"“interested stockholder” is, generally, a stockholder who owns 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock or an affiliate of ours who has owned 15% or more of our outstanding voting stock during the past three years, subject to certain exceptions as described in the DGCL.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSBack to Table of Contents

None.

None.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIESBack to Table of Contents

Our principal executive office is located

After the year-ended December 31, 2017: (i) the Registrant’s subsidiary, Virtual Crypto IL, leased offices facilities from an unaffiliated third-party at SOSA house, 12 Bar Yochayst, Tel Aviv 665320,10 Ha’amal Street, Rosh Ha’ain, Israel Telephone: (972) 52-579-5082. This office consist4809234 consisting of approximately 300600 square feet of executive office space, which isfor $1,475 per month; and (ii) the Registrant was provided to us onuse of an office at 40 Wall Street, 28thFloor, New York, NY 10005, at a rent-free basis. Our wholly-owned subsidiary has offices at the same address, which it leasescost of $100 per month from an unaffiliated third party for $1,600 per month.party. The Registrant believes that the officeits present facilities are sufficient for the foreseeable future.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGBack to Table of Contents

None.

On December 12, 2016, the Registrant filed a Form 8-K reporting that at a meeting of its Board of Directors held on November 18, 2016, at which meeting the majority of the Registrant’s Board of Directors authorized the termination of Lior Wayn as CEO/president of the Registrant and of its wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary, Emerald IL. The termination of Mr. Wayn as an executive officer of the Registrant and Emerald IL was “for cause” as described more fully in the Form 8-K, which is incorporated by reference herein. In addition, the Form 8-K further reported that in connection with, Mr. Wayn’s termination as an executive officer, Mr. Wayn was removed as a director of the Registrant in accordance with the provisions of Section 141(k) of the Delaware General Corporation Law based upon the written consent of the holders of the majority of the Registrant’s shares of common stock at November 16, 2016.

In April 2017, a lawsuit was filed with the Tel Aviv court by Mr. Wayn claiming certain damages to the total amount of $100,000, under the assertion of wrongful dismissal by the Registrant and Emerald IL. The Registrant believes these claims to be unsubstantiated and wholly without merit and intends to defend itself against these claims. The Company believes that he will not be successful in his claim. Nevertheless, the outcome of the proceeding will not materially affect the Registrant.

In December 2017, a liquidation request was filed with the Tel Aviv District Court by a group of former employees of Emerald IL, under the assertion of delay of pay and insolvency. On December 20, 2017, at a hearing before the court, it was ordered that the Emerald IL shall settle its pension debts to the former employees under applicable Israeli law within 21 days and settle its other debts to them in 60 days, the failure of which would result in a winding-up order (the equivalent of a liquidation) could be given. Based on the collaboration of Emerald IL and its former employees and the fact that the Company was in negotiation with third-parties for the infusion of equity capital and has started negotiating the sale of certain assets, the Company’s legal advisors believe that the liquidation claim will be dismissed by the court. The amounts being claimed by the former employees was less than $96,000 and are included in current liabilities at December 31, 2017.

On January 29, 2018, the “Registrant”) transferred the ordinary shares of the Registrant’s former Israeli subsidiary, Emerald IL to Attorney Eviatar Knoller, Esq., with offices at20 Lincoln, Tel Aviv-Jaffa 6713412, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The purpose of the transfer of the management shares to the Trustee, pursuant to resolution of the Registrant’s Board of Directors, was to enable the Trustee to liquidate the management shares and/or the assets of Emerald IL to satisfy its debtsand satisfy its financial obligations to former employees. As a result, the former employees of Emerald IL commenced an action in a court of competent jurisdiction in Israel to liquidate Emerald IL and use any assets to satisfy the debts owed to the former employees. Effective March 8, 2018, Emerald IL ceased to be a wholly-owned subsidiary and a part of the Registrant.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURESBack to Table of Contents

None.


None.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'SREGISTRANT’S COMMON STOCK, AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERBack to Table of ContentsMATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASE OF EQUITY

Market Information

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTCQB market under the symbol MRLA.VCRP. For the periods indicated, the following table sets forth the high and low bid prices per share of common stock. The below prices, adjusted for a one-for-four (1:4) reverse split effective March 20, 2015, represent inter-dealer quotations without retail markup, markdown, or commission and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

Fiscal 2015

Fiscal 2014

Fiscal 2013

High

Low

High

Low

High

Low

First Quarter ended March 31

$

0.20

$

0.11

$

0.14

$

0.11

$

0.70

$

0.12

Second Quarter ended June 30

$

2.24

$

0.45

$

0.14

$

0.14

$

0.70

$

0.12

Third Quarter ended September 30

$

2.24

$

1.00

$

0.14

$

0.14

$

0.34

$

0.12

Fourth Quarter ended December 31

$

1.25

$

1.00

$

0.40

$

0.14

$

0.12

$

0.11

  Fiscal 2017  Fiscal 2016  Fiscal 2015 
  High  Low  High  Low  High  Low 
First Quarter ended March 31 $0.51  $0.07  $1.75  $0.55  $0.20  $0.11 
Second Quarter ended June 30 $0.28  $0.04  $0.77  $0.55  $2.24  $0.45 
Third Quarter ended September 30 $0.07  $0.01  $0.74  $0.30  $2.24  $1.00 
Fourth Quarter ended December 31 $0.07  $0.02  $0.40  $0.16  $1.25  $1.00 

Holders of Common Stock

As of December 31, 2015, our shares of common stock were held by approximately 2,540 stockholders of record. Our

Our transfer agent is Transfer Online, 512 SE Salmon Street, Portland, OR 97214-3444, Phone: (503) 227-2950.

Dividends

Dividends

Holders of common stock are entitled to dividends if declared by the Board of Directors, out of funds legally available therefore. We have never declared cash dividends on our common stock and our Board of Directors does not anticipate paying cash dividends in the foreseeable future as it intends to retain future earnings to finance the growth of our businesses.

Rule 144 Shares

As of the date of this Registration Statement, we do not have any significant number of shares of our Common Stock that are currently available for sale to the public in accordance with the volume and trading limitations of Rule 144. This is due to the fact that shares of our Common Stock that were issued prior to the end of May 2015, at which time we ceased to be a shell company, as a result of our effective control of the business and financial operations and decisions of Emerald, were deemed to be a "shell" company as that term is defined under Rule 405 and Rule 144(i) promulgated by the SEC under the Act.

Option Grants

During 2015, we granted 534,400 options under our ESOP plan at an exercise price ranging between $0.01 and $0.40.

Outstanding Warrants

 

The following table summarizes information of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2015:2017:

 

WarrantsWarrant TermExercise PriceExercisable Warrants Warrant Term Exercise Price Exercisable 
Investors - Class A Warrants (1)4,149,7192 years$0.804,149,719  6,334,626   1years  $0.14-.080   6,334,626 
Investors - Class B Warrants (2)2,500,0002 years$0.402,500,000  5,400,478   5years  $0.14   5,400,478 
Investors - Class C Warrants (3)  5,072,492  (3) $(3)  5,072,492
Lior Wayn - Class E Warrants (4)  2,700,000  (4) $0.0001  2,700,000
Investor - Class E Warrants  900,000   (1) $0.0001   900,000 

 

(1) The Class A Warrants were issued in connection with a private placement in reliance upon Regulation S, pursuant to which the Registrant soldDuring 2015, a total of 4,149,719 units at a price of $0.40 per unit (the "Units"), each Unit comprised of one Share and one Class A Warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 months. While all of the Class A Warrants are exercisable within 60 days, in fact, none of these warrants will be exercised for the foreseeable future, based upon the exercise price of $0.80 per Share.
(2) The Class B Warrants were issued to consultants for bona fide services to the Company and are exercise, on a cashless basis at a price of $0.40 per Share for a period of two years.
(3) The Class C Unit Warrants were issued to consultants for bona fide services to the Company, and each Unit is exercisable at a price of $0.40 to purchase one Share of Common Stock and one Class A Warrant which, in turn, is exercisable to purchase one additional Share at a price of $0.80. The Class C Unit Warrants expire ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
(4) The2,700,000 Class E Warrants were issued by the RegistrantCompany to Lior Wayn in connection withpursuant to the Closingterms of the Share Exchange Agreement. The Class E Warrants areAgreement and were exercisable to purchase a total of 2,700,000 Shares, in three equal tranches of 900,000 Shares each (the "Tranches"“Tranches”) at an exercise price of $0.0001 per Share, subject to and within 45 days of the RegistrantCompany achieving the milestones defined in the table below (the "Milestones").Share Exchange Agreement. On December 16, 2016, the Company terminated of Lior Way’s employment agreements with the Company and Emerald Israel., and his removal as an executive officer and director. During 2017, Mr. Wayn transferred, sold and assigned his 5,212,878 shares of the Company’s common stock and 900,000 Class E Warrants that were fully-vested to an entity controlled by Mr. Alimi Ahmed, then a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Effective as of December 31, 2016, the remaining 1,800,000 Class E Warrants that had been issued to Mr. Wayn Warrants were canceled.

 

Milestone

Description
FirstThe Registrant, on a consolidated basis, obtaining five (5) medical service providers (e.g., hospitals, clinics, etc.) as pilot customers within two years of Closing.
SecondThe Registrant, on a consolidated basis, reaching an agreement with an insurer or medical service provider (e.g., insurance company or HMO), insuring at least 300,000 customers, within two years of Closing.
ThirdThe Registrant, on a consolidated basis, reaching gross revenue of $1,000,000 within any period of twelve consecutive months in which the aggregate gross revenue that may be attributed to the last three months of such period shall not be less than $400,000, within three years of Closing.

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

No equity compensation plan or agreements has been adopted

The following table summarizes information of outstanding options as of December 31, 2015.2017:

  Number of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Weighted-average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights  Number of securities remaining available for future issuance 
Plan Category         
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders 2014 Equity Incentive Plan  5,076,483  $0.2   - 

Sale of Unregistered Securities

During the last three years, theRegistrantissued the following restricted shares which were not registered under the Act.Act

 

On December 16, 2014, the Registrant issued 4,125,000 restricted Shares to five holdersSale of the Registrant’s convertible notesUnregistered Securities in the principal amount of $125,000 (the "Notes") upon their conversion the Notes. The table below sets forth the issuances of restricted Shares to note holders made in reliance on Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under the Act ("Reg S").

Name of Note HolderBasis of IssuanceTotal Notes ConvertedShares Issued (1)
Eli YoreshConversion of Notes$12,500412,500
Kfir SilbermanConversion of Notes$18,750618,750
Amir UzielConversion of Notes$31,2501,031,250
Itschak ShremConversion of Notes$31,2501,031,250
Lavi KrasneyConversion of Notes$31,2501,031,250
 Total $125,000   4,125,000 

(1) Adjusted for the 1:4 reverse stock split effective in March 2015. No warrants were issued in connection with the conversion of these notes.2015

 

On June 18, 2015 and July 21, 2015, after the Company ceased to be a shell company, the Company issued and sold unregistered securities, as set forth in the table below, in private offering of a total of 2,762,5002,925,000 units at a price of $0.40. Each Unit consisted of one Share and one Class A Warrant exercisable to purchase one additional Share of Common Stock at a price of $0.80 (the "Units"“Units”). The sales were made without registration under the Act in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Act and Reg S.

 

Name of Subscriber Bases for Issuance Date of Issuance Price Per Unit Shares Issued Bases for Issuance Date of Issuance Price Per Unit Shares Issued 
Short Trade Ltd (1) Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 625,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   625,000 
Prop Trade Ltd (2) Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 375,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   375,000 
Dr. Ben Zion Weiner Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 125,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   125,000 
RP Holdings (1992) Ltd. (3) Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 125,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   125,000 
Dr. Tank Siak Khim Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 250,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   250,000 
Yoel Yogev Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 200,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   200,000 
Universal Link Ltd (4) Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 175,000 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   175,000 
Avigdor Hakmon Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 62,500 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   62,500 
Dr. Shmuel Pasternak Subscription Agreement 06/18/2015 $0.40 62,500 Subscription Agreement  06/18/2015  $0.40   62,500 
Liat Sidi Subscription Agreement 07/21/2015 $0.40 25,000 Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   25,000 
Tzvi Aharonson Subscription Agreement 07/21/2015 $0.40 137,500 Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   137,500 
Estory Giloz Ran Subscription Agreement 07/21/2015 $0.40 312,500
EsteryGiloz Ran Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   312,500 
Malca Maimon Subscription Agreement 07/21/2015 $0.40 87,500 Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   87,500 
Ohad Cohen Subscription Agreement 07/21/2015 $0.40 150,000 Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   150,000 
Nissim SimhonSubscription Agreement07/21/2015$0.4050,000 Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   50,000 
NE Solution Ltd (5) Subscription Agreement 07/21/2015 $0.40 162,500 Subscription Agreement  07/21/2015  $0.40   162,500 
 Total   $1,169,961 2,925,000 Total    $1,169,961   2,925,000 

 

(1) Short Trade Ltd is controlled by Mr. Shlomo Noyman, a resident of Israel.

(2) Prop Trade Ltd is controlled by Mr. Andrew Philip Dings, a resident of Singapore.

(3) RP Holdings (1992) Ltd. is controlled by Mr. Rubin Zimerman, a resident of Israel.

(4) Universal Link Ltd is controlled by Mr. Ahmad Alimi, a resident of Israel.

(5) NE Solution Ltd is controlled by Mr. Lee Yang Tong, a resident of Singapore.

In July 2015, the persons listed in the table below, each a lender to Emerald on or before November 2014, converted their debt owed by Emerald into Units, each consisting of one restricted Share and one Class A Warrant, at a conversion price of $0.32. Each of the lenders was a resident of Israel and the issuance was without registration under the Act in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Act and Reg S.

 

Name of Note Holder Bases of Issuance Debt Converted Shares Issued Bases of Issuance $ Debt Converted Shares Issued 
David MasasaConversion of Debt$8,78827,463  Conversion of Debt   8,788   27,463 
Liron CarmelConversion of Debt$19,52161,003  Conversion of Debt   19,521   61,003 
Yoseph CohenConversion of Debt$15,63248,850  Conversion of Debt   15,632   48,850 
Tzvi AharonsonConversion of Debt$43,969137,403  Conversion of Debt   43,969   137,403 
 Total $87,910  274,719  Total  $87,910   274,719 

On July 21, 2015, the Registrant issued 140,000 restricted Shares to Shira Brand Shiffer, a resident of Israel, at a price of $0.107 per Share, with no warrants attached. The issuance to Shira Brand Shiffer, without registration under the Act, was made in reliance upon Section 4(2) of the Act and Reg S.

On July 16, 2015, the Registrant issued 517,900 restricted shares of Common Stock to Meyda Consulting Ltd, an entity organized under the laws of Israel controlled by Eliyahu Kirstein, a resident of Israel. The issuance of these shares was in consideration for services and was made without registration under the Act in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Act and Reg S.

On July 16, 2015, the Registrant issued Class B Warrants and Class C Unit Warrants to the following entities for bona fide services to the Registrant. The issuances of these Warrants waswere in consideration for services and was made without registration under the Act in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Act and Reg S.

  Basis of Issuance  Class B Warrant Issued  Class C Unit Warrants Issued  Total Warrants Issued 
Yaad Consulting Ltd. (1)  Services   625,000  $634,063   1,259,063 
LA Pure Capital Ltd. (2)  Services   375,000  $380,467   755,467 
Amir Uziel Economic Consultant Ltd. (3)  Services   625,000  $634,061   1,259,061 
Capitalink Ltd. (4)  Services   625,000  $634,061   1,259,061 

(1) The control person of Yaad Consulting Ltd is Itschak Shrem, a resident of Israel.

(2) The control person of LA Pure Capital Ltd is Kfir Silberman, a resident of Israel.

(3) The control person of Amir Uziel Economic Consultant Ltd. is Amir Uziel, a resident of Israel.

(4) The control person of CaptalinkCapitalink Ltd is Lavi Krasney, a resident of Israel.

During November 2015, the Registrant issued and sold unregistered Shares as set forth on the table below:

Name of IssueeDate of IssuanceNumber of SharesConsiderationConsiderationBases for Issuance
Shirat Hahayim11/17/2015250,000$0.40 per shareSubscription Agreement (1)
Lyons Capital LLC. (2)11/05/2015250,000Valued at $1.00 per shareServices
David Treves11/16/201512,334Valued at $1.00 per shareServices
Pnina Rosenblum11/09/20155,750Valued at $1.00 per shareServices
Total Shares Issued518,084518,084

(1) The issuance was pursuant to a Unit Subscription Agreement each consisting of 1 Share and 1 Class A Warrant exercisable for a period of 24 months to purchase 1 additional Share at $0.80.

(2) Lyons Capital LLC is organized under the laws of Florida and its control person, Jason Lyons, is a resident of Florida.

The issuance and sale of Shares to Shirat Hahayim and Pnina Rosenbluem,Rosenblum, residents of the State of Israel, and David Treves, resident of Australia, without registration under the Act, was made in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Act and and Regulation S promulgated by the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC"“SEC”) under the Act. The issuance of Shares to Lyons Capital LLC, without registration under the Act, was in reliance upon Section 4(2) and Regulation D promulgated by the SEC under the Act.

Sale of Unregistered Securities in 2016:

Name of IssueeDate of IssuanceNumber of SharesConsiderationBases for Issuance
Yair Fudim02/18/2016482,000Valued at $0.9995 per shareServices
Estery Giloz Ran02/18/2016482,000Valued at $0.9995 per shareServices
Baruch Kfir02/18/2016231,000Valued at $0.9995 per shareServices
Legend Securities Inc03/17/201650,000Valued at $0.65per shareServices
JFS Investments PR LLC01/26/2016125,000Valued at $1.75 per shareServices
Garden state securities Inc05/04/2016150,000Valued at $0.70 per shareServices
JFS Investments PR LLC05/10/201641,667Valued at $0.71 per shareServices
Kodiak Capital Group LLC05/18/2016150,000Valued at $0.68 per shareServices
Alpha Capital Anstalt06/26/2016125,000Valued at $0.70 per shareServices
Legend Securities Inc06/28/201650,000Valued at $0.70 per shareServices
JFS Investments PR LLC06/30/2016333,333Valued at $0.68 per shareServices
VAR Growth Corporation07/01/2016300,000Valued at $0.71 per shareServices
David Treves07/27/20166,767Valued at $0.53 per shareServices
Firstfire Global Opportunities Fund LLC08/04/201631,250Valued at $0.49 per shareServices
Guy Shalom10/11/2016119,000$0.40 per shareInvestment
Total Shares Issued2,677,017

During 2016, the Registrant issued Class A Warrants and Class B Unit Warrants to the following entities for bona fide services to the Registrant. The issuances of these Warrants were in consideration for convertible note payable and was made without registration under the Act in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Act and Reg S.

Name of Subscriber Bases for Issuance Date of Issuance  Price Per Unit  Class A Warrant Issued  Class B Warrant Issued 
Ilan Malca Subscription Agreement  05/24/2016  $0.40   100,000   - 
Alpha Capital Anstalt Subscription Agreement  05/30/2016  $0.40   1,000,000   1,000,000 
Maz Partners LP Subscription Agreement  03/31/2016  $0.40   200,000   - 
Chi Squared Capital Inc Subscription Agreement  05/30/2016  $0.40   100,000   100,000 
Firstfire Global Opportunities Fund LLC Subscription Agreement  07/07/2016  $0.40   250,000   250,000 
Guy Shalom Investment Agreement  10/11/2016  $0.40   119,000   - 
Total Warrants Issued            1,769,000   1,350,000 

Sale of Unregistered Securities in 2017:

On February 24, 2017, Publicis Groupe 90 (“Publicis 90”) invested 500,000 Euros or approximately U$526,000 and the Registrant accepted a Reg S Subscription Agreement from Publicis 90 in consideration for the issuance to Publicis 90 of 1,315,563 restricted shares of the Registrant’s common stock at a subscription price of $0.40 per share. The issuance was made in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under the Act.

On April 25, 2017, a holder of a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 converted $10,400 into 74,572, shares based on an adjusted conversion price of $0.14. The conversion price was adjusted on March 22, 2017 pursuant to the provisions of the 2016 Secured Convertible Note Agreement.

On June 12, 2017, certain warrant holders holding 1,100,000 Class A Warrants and 1,100,000 Class B Warrants, elected to exercise certain warrants on a cashless basis. In accordance with the 2016 Secured Convertible Note Agreement the Class A warrants and Class B warrants were increased to 5,665,626 each, based on an adjusted share price of $0.14 per share and 3,451,490 Class B Warrants were converted to 1,096,395 shares at $0.14 per share. The exercise price and amount of shares issued were adjusted on March 22, 2017.

On June 12, 2017, the Company completed the issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Alpha Anstalt Capital (“Alpha”) pursuant to the Company’s agreement with Alpha in the prior year.

In July and August 2017, the Company issued 571,429 units to two accredited investors for $0.14 per unit in total amount of $80,000. Each unit consist (i) 571,429 restricted shares at a price of $0.14 per share, (ii) 571,429 warrants exercisable for a one-year period in exercise price of $0.14, and (iii) 571,429 warrants exercisable for a two-year. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had not issued the shares to the accredited investors.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATABack to Table of Contents

None.

17

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND PLAN OF OPERATIONBack to Table of Contents

Overview

The following plan of operation provides information which management believes is relevant to an assessment and understanding of our results of operations and financial condition. The discussion should be read along with our financial statements and notes thereto. This section includes a number of forward-looking statements that reflect our current views with respect to future events and financial performance. Forward-looking statements are often identified by words like believe, expect, estimate, anticipate, intend, project and similar expressions, or words which refer to future events. These forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from our predictions.

Plan of Operations

On January 23, 2018, the Registrant, through its newly organized, wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary, Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd. (the “Subsidiary”), entered into a binding term sheet (the “Term Sheet”) with Chiron Refineries Ltd. (“Chiron”), a public company listed on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE: CHR). Pursuant to the Term Sheet, the Registrant’s Subsidiary shall: (i) appoint a wholly-owned subsidiary of Chiron, under incorporation under the laws of the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, as the exclusive distributor (the “Distributor”) of our Subsidiary’s products (as defined below) in the territory of the Republic of Turkey, including the territory of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (the “Territory”); and (ii) the Distributor shall have the right to appoint sub-distributors within the Territory.

Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd. was formed on January 17, 2018, to develop and market software and hardware products facilitating, allowing and supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices (the “Products”).

On January 29, 2018, Virtual Crypto Technologies, Inc., f/k/a Emerald Medical Applications Corp. (the “Registrant”) transferred the management shares of the Registrant’s former Israeli subsidiary, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. (“Emerald IL”) owned by the Registrant to Attorney Eviatar Knoller, Esq., with offices at20 Lincoln, Tel Aviv-Jaffa 6713412, as trustee (the “Trustee”). The purpose of the transfer of the management shares to the Trustee, pursuant to resolution of the Registrant’s Board of Directors dated January 29, 2018, was to enable the Trustee to liquidate the management shares and/or the assets of Emerald IL to satisfy its debts.

The operations of its former subsidiary never generated any revenues and was unable to raise capital to fund its ongoing operations and satisfy its financial obligations to former employees. As a result, the former employees of Emerald IL commenced an action in a court of competent jurisdiction in Israel to liquidate Emerald IL and use any assets to satisfy the debts owed to the former employees. Effective March 8, 2018, Emerald IL ceased to be a wholly-owned subsidiary and a part of the Registrant.

On January 17, 2018, the Registrant formed Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd as a new wholly-owned subsidiary under the laws of the State of Israel (“Virtual Crypto Israel”).

Our Business Operations during 2017

We arewere a digital health startup company engaged in the development, sale and service of imaging solutions utilizing our proprietary DermaCompare software that we developed for use in derma imaging and analytics (our "DermaCompare"“DermaCompare” or "Product"“Product”). In our development ofWe believed that the DermaCompare technology, we utilized the knowledge learned from advanced military image processing and data analytics to improve the analysis of medical images for the benefit of patients and the medical community. We believe that our proprietary DermaCompare software represents an advancement in skin cancer screening that should enable physicians to more readily identify and monitor changes in their patients’ skin characteristics.

 

DermaCompare is Emerald’s first application of its technology, which we believe represents an advance in the early detection of skin cancer. DermaCompare is based on automated image analytics software using advanced algorithms for alignment, anchoring, identifying and detecting changes in the shapes, colors and sizes of skin lesions, which could potentially become Melanoma. We apply our DermaCompare technology in image capture, correction and intelligent data extraction in the market for derma imaging products.

Our DermaCompare solution allowsallowed dermatologists and other medical care professionals, using a set of 25 total body photography ("TBP"(“TBP”), to capture sets of skin lesion images with, among other devices, digital cameras, camera-equipped smart phones or tablets. These images are then transmitted online and are remotely analyzed by professionals using our DermaCompare software.

 

OurThe DermaCompare imaging software has 2 main modules:

 

 A SaaS cloud-based Dr. Module that can be launched on any desktop computer connected to the Internet; or
 Mobile APP for mass population uses can be installed on smart phones or tablets with iOS or Android operating systems.

 

Our future plans also contemplate the use of wearable computing and imaging devices such as Google glasses or other comparable devices.

Our sales and marketing plan which has already commenced, iswas to sell licenses for our DermaCompare imaging software to: NHSs, HMOs, health insurance companies, hospitals and medical clinics through distributers, health care channel partners or directly through independent salespersons and/or web purchase to dermatologists and other physicians (GPs) that we expect to purchase licenses based on the number of potential numbers of patients.

In furtherance of our business plan, which has resulted in us becoming an operating company, weWe have entered into a series of agreements with unaffiliated third parties for the distribution of its DermaCompare Technology, as follows:

1. On August 12, 2013, Emerald entered into an exclusive distribution with Derma Italy Sri, organized under the laws of the Italy ("Derma Italy"), pursuant to which Derma Italy was granted exclusive distribution rights in Italy;
2. On December 1, 2013, Emerald entered into a distribution agreement with S. Bokhorst - Creatiekracht, organized under the laws of the Netherlands, pursuant to which S. Bokhorst was granted exclusive distribution in the Netherlands;
3. On February 6, 2014, Emerald entered into a distribution agreement with Medical Edge Pty Ltd, organized under the laws of Australia ("Medical Edge"), pursuant to which Medical Edge was granted exclusive distribution rights in the markets of Australia, New Zealand and Oceania;
4. On January 14, 2015, Emerald entered into a Project Agreement with Realize S.A. and Ubitech, entities engaged in IT related to medical technology in Greece, and MEDISP and MPUoP, academic and research institutes in Greece (collectively, the "Greek Partners"). Emerald and the Greek Partners anticipate imminent grants from the Office of Chief Scientist of the State of Israel and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology of Greece, respectively, the proceeds of which will be used for development of enhanced smartphone applications for diagnosis of early stage Melanoma.

1.On August 12, 2013, Emerald entered into an exclusive distribution with Derma Italy Sri, organized under the laws of the Italy (“Derma Italy”), pursuant to which Derma Italy was granted exclusive distribution rights in Italy;
2.On December 1, 2013, Emerald entered into a distribution agreement with S. Bokhorst - Creatiekracht, organized under the laws of the Netherlands, pursuant to which S. Bokhorst was granted exclusive distribution in the Netherlands;
3.On February 6, 2014, Emerald entered into a distribution agreement with Medical Edge Pty Ltd, organized under the laws of Australia (“Medical Edge”), pursuant to which Medical Edge was granted exclusive distribution rights in the markets of Australia, New Zealand and Oceania;
4.On January 14, 2015, Emerald entered into a Project Agreement with Realize S.A. and Ubitech, entities engaged in IT related to medical technology in Greece, and MEDISP and MPUoP, academic and research institutes in Greece (collectively, the “Greek Partners”). Emerald and the Greek Partners anticipate imminent grants from the Office of Chief Scientist of the State of Israel and the General Secretariat for Research and Technology of Greece, respectively, the proceeds of which will be used for development of enhanced smartphone applications for diagnosis of early stage Melanoma.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we raised $989,974 through the issuance of equity debt and we may be expected to require up to an additional $1.5 million in capital during the next 12 months to fully implement our business plan and fund our operations. 

Results of Operations during the year ended December 31, 20152017 as compared to the year ended December 31, 20142016

We have had no revenues for the years ended December 31, 20152016 and 2014.2015. We had operating expenses related to research and development and general and administrative expenses

During the year ended December 31, 2015, we incurred $8,756,267 in net loss due to $740,197 research and development expenses and $7,296,798 in general and administrative expenses, $6,494 depreciation expense, $30,604 interest expense, $678,027 loss on settlement of debt and $4,147 loss from foreign currency translation.

During the year ended December 31, 2014,2017, we incurred $105,049$1,573,906 in net loss due to $116,863$354,809 research and development expenses and $911,581 in general and administrative expenses, $66 depreciation expense, $5,605 interest expense, a$313,984 in financing expenses.

During the year ended December 31, 2016, we incurred $6,145,197 in net loss of $7,385due to $1,644,868 research and development expenses and $3,749,867 in fair value of derivative, $20,993general and administrative expenses, $750,462 in income from grants and $3,877 gain from foreign currency translation.financing expenses.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

On December 31, 2015,2017, we have had current assets of $141,246$15,181 consisting of $115,449$2,959 in cash and other receivables of $25,797.$12,222. We had fixed assets, net of $21,120.$14,290. We had $288,775$1,011,941 in current liabilities consisting of $90,705$445,653 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $3,480$82,331 in accounts payable to related party, $25,612$98,476 employee payable, $19,285$67,846 in accrued interest, and short-term portion of convertible notes of $317,635.

On December 31, 2016, we have had current assets of $13,842 consisting of $4,486 in cash and other receivables of $9,356. We had fixed assets, net of $31,803. We had $958,197 in current liabilities consisting of $258,795 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $125,962 in accounts payable to related party, $101,341 employee payable, $32,768 in accrued interest, short-term note payable of $119,974$29,743 and $29,719$409,588 in convertible note payable.

As of December 31, 2014, we had current assets of $40,128 consisting of cash of $14,411, due from related party of $18,999, other receivables of $6,718. We had fixed assets of $1,390. As of December 31, 2014, we had total current liabilities of $137,635 consisting of $2,577 in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $4,439 accounts payable due to related party, $2,013 accrued interest, $19,521 short term notes payable due to related party, $20,164 in convertible notes payable, net of discount, $20,532 derivative liability and $68,389 in short term notes payable.

We had negative working capital of $147,529$1,003,228 and $97,507$944,355 as of December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 2014,2016, respectively. The Company is assessing a number of options to increase its working capital to better sustain its operations. During the first quarter of 2018 we raised $1.9 million through the issuances of convertible loans and addition equity financings. Our total liabilities as of December 31, 20152017 were $288,775$1,624,574 compared to $137,635$958,197 at December 31, 2014.2016.

During the year ended December 31, 2015,2017, we had negative cash flow from operations of $1,301,823$619,734 which was mainly the result of a net loss of $8,756,267, $19,079$1,573,906, $2,866 increase in other receivables, $40,339 increase in amounts due from related party and offset by, $6,626,619 in non-cash compensation, $678,027 loss on settlement of debt, $109,176$183,993 increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities $260 in decrease in related party payables, $24,913 increase in employee payable, $18,999 decrease in amounts due from related party, $6,494 depreciation expense, and $9,555$360,598 interest and amortization of debt discount.discount on convertible debt.

During the year ended December 31, 2014,2016, we had negative cash flow from operations of $110,694$818,533 which was mainly the result of a net loss of $105,049, $18,999$6,145,197, $16,441 decrease in other receivables and offset by $4,714,117 in non-cash compensation, $122,991 increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $75,729 increase in employee payable, $122,482 increase in amounts due from related party, and $6,718 increase in other receivables and offset by $4,590 increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities, $4,439 increase in related parties payable, $66$12,422 depreciation expense, and $3,592$409,588 amortization of debt discount and $7,385 change in fair value of derivative liability.discount.

During the year ended December 31, 2015,2016, we offset our negative cash flow from operations by $380,000$47,600 proceeds from sale of common stock (net of issuance expenses), and $609,974$695,000 issuance of short-term convertible payable. In addition, investing activities resulted in proceeds of $441,156 due to $467,380 related to the reverse merger offset by $26,224$23,105 due to purchase of property and equipment.

During the year ended December 31, 2014, we offset our negative cash flow from operations by $117,629 issuance of short-term payable. In addition we had negative cash flow from investing activities of $1,456 due to purchase of property and equipment.

Availability of Additional Capital

Our potential financing transactions may include the issuance of equity and/or debt securities including convertible debt, obtaining credit facilities, or other financing mechanisms. In the event that we seek to raise funds through additional private placements of equity or convertible debt, the trading price of our common stock could be adversely effected. Further, any adverse conditions in the financial markets could make it more difficult to obtain future financing through the issuance of equity or debt securities when and if needed. Even if we are able to raise a sufficient amount of funds that may be required, it is possible that we could incur unexpected costs and expenses or experience unexpected cash requirements that would force us to seek additional and/or alternative financing. Further, if we issue additional equity or debt securities, stockholders may experience additional dilution or the new equity securities may have rights, preferences or privileges senior to those of existing holders of our common stock. If additional financing is not available or is not available on acceptable terms, we may have to curtail our plan of operations.

The Company has only limited capital. Additional financing is necessary for the Company to continue as a going concern. Our independent auditors have issued an unqualified audit opinion for the year ended December 31, 20152017 with an explanatory paragraph on going concern.

In view of these matters, realization of a major portion of the assets in the accompanying balance sheet is dependent upon continued operations of the Company. Management believes that actions presently being taken to obtain additional equity financing will provide the opportunity to continue as a going concern.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

As of December 31, 20152017, and 2014,2016, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of Regulation S-K promulgated under the Securities Act of 1934.

 

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

 

As of December 31, 20152017, and 2014,2016, we did not have any contractual obligations.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Our significant accounting policies are described in the notes to our financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2015,2017 and are included elsewhere in this prospectus.annual report.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISKBack to Table of Contents

We have not entered into, and do not expect to enter into, financial instruments for trading or hedging purposes.


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATABack to Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm2922
Financial Statements for the Years Ended December 31, 20152017 and 20142016
Balance Sheets3023
Statements of Operations
Statements of Operations31
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)3224
Statements of Cash Flows3325
Statement of Stockholders'Stockholders’ Deficit3426
Notes to Financial Statements35
27


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMBack to Table of Contents

To the Board of Directors
TO THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS AND STOCKHOLDERS OF

Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp.Corp)

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp. ("the Company") and its subsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016 and the related consolidated statements of operations,comprehensive loss, shareholders' deficit and cash flows for each of the two years then ended. in the period ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company's lack of revenues and substantial operating losses raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans concerning these matters are also described in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of' these uncertainties.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company's financial statements based on our audits.audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included considerationAs part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An

Our audit includesincluded performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. AnOur audit also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provideaudit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion,

Brightman Almagor Zohar & Co.

Certified Public Accountants

Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited

Tel Aviv, Israel

April 17, 2018

We have served as the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position ofCompany's auditor since 2016

 

22

Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp. atCorp)

Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 20152017, and 2014, and the results of its operations and cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.2016

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Assets      
Current assets:        
Cash and cash equivalents $2,959  $4,486 
Other receivables (Note 2)  12,222   9,356 
Total current assets  15,181   13,842 
         
Restricted cash  59   11,925 
Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $26,120 at December 31, 2017 and $8,607 at December 31, 2016  14,290   31,803 
Total assets $29,530  $57,570 
         
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)        
Current liabilities:        
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities (Note 3) $445,653  $198,795 
Accounts payable - related party (Note 7)  82,331   125,962 
Employee payable  98,476   161,341 
Accrued interest payable (Note 5)  67,846   32,768 
Short term portion of convertible notes (Note 5)  317,635   439,331 
Derivative Liability (Note 5)  -   (**)336,272 
Total current liabilities  1,011,941   1,294.469 
         
Convertible notes (Note 5)  606,165   - 
Total liabilities  1,618,106   1,294,469 
         
Stockholders’ deficit        
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; 529 and none issued at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively.  (*)   - 
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 490,000,000 shares authorized; 22,543,008 and 19,962,728 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively. (Note 6)  2,255   1,994 
Accumulated other comprehensive income  (19,337)  (19,337)
Additional paid-in capital (Note 6)  14,968,925   13,826,957 
Receipt on account of shares (Note 6)  80,000   - 
Accumulated deficit  (16,620,419)  (**)(15,046,513) 
Total stockholders’ deficit  (1,588,576)  (1,236,899)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit $29,530  $57,570 

(*) less than $1

(**) Restated – see Note 10.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As described in Note 2notes are an integral part of the financial statements, the Company had incurred a loss, had negative cash flow from operating activities and no revenue during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan in regard to these matters is also described in Note 2 to the financial statements. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ M&K CPAS, PLLC
www.mkacpas.com
Houston, Texas
March 31, 2016


Emerald Medical Applications Corp.
Balance Sheets
As of December 31, 2015 and 2014
Back to Table of Contents
  
December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Assets
Current assets:
   Cash and cash equivalents$115,449$14,411
   Due from related party-18,999
   Other receivable25,7976,718
Total current assets 141,246  40,128
  
Fixed assets, net
   Fixed assets, net of accumulated depreciation of $6,536 and $66, respectively21,1201,390
Total assets$162,366 $41,518
  
Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
Current liabilities:
   Accounts payable and accrued liabilities$90,705$2,577
   Accounts payable - related party3,4804,439
   Employee payable25,612-
   Accrued interest payable19,2852,013
   Short term notes payable - related party-19,521
   Short term notes payable119,97468,389
   Convertible note payable, net of discount of $0 and $9,555, respectively29,71920,164
   Derivative liability-20,532
Total current liabilities288,775137,635
Total liabilities 288,775  137,635
  
Stockholders' equity (deficit)
Preferred stock, $0.0001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued.--
Common stock, $0.0001 par value; 490,000,000 shares authorized;
   15,325,889 and 7,438,141 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.1,533744
Accumulated other comprehensive income(19,337)8,932
Additional paid-in capital8,752,711(744)
Accumulated deficit(8,861,316)(105,049)
Total stockholders' deficit (126,409)  (96,117)
Total liabilities and stockholders' equity (deficit)$162,366 $41,518
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Emerald Medical Applications Corp.
Statements of Operations
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Back to Table of Contents
  
Twelve monthsTwelve months
endedended
December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
  
Revenues$-$-
  
Expenses:
   Research and development(740,197)-
   General and administrative expenses(7,296,798)(116,863)
Total operating expenses(8,036,995)(116,863)
  
Loss from operations(8,036,995)(116,863)
  
Other income (expense):
   Depreciation expense(6,494)(66)
   Interest expense(30,604)(5,605)
   Change in fair value of derivative-(7,385)
   Gain/(loss) from foreign currency(4,147)3,877
   Other income from grants-20,993
   Loss on settlement of debt(678,027)-
Other income (expense)(719,272)11,814
  
Total income (expense)(8,756,267)(105,049)
  
   Provision for income taxes--
  
Net loss$(8,756,267)$(105,049)
  
Basic and diluted (net loss per share)$(0.81)$(0.01)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted10,872,5267,348,141
  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Emerald Medical Applications Corp.
Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Back to Table of Contents
  
Twelve monthsTwelve months
endedended
December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Net loss$(8,756,267)$(105,049)
Change in unrealized foreign currency translation gain (loss)(28,269)8,932
   Total comprehensive income (loss)$(8,784,536)$(96,117)
  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Emerald Medical Applications Corp.
Statements of Cash Flows
For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
Back to Table of Contents
  
Twelve monthsTwelve months
endedended
December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Operating Activities:
Net (loss)$(8,756,267)$(105,049)
   Depreciation expense6,49466
   Amortization of debt discount9,5553,592
   Change in fair value of derivative liabilities-7,385
   Shares issued for services885,984-
   Warrants issued for services5,343,088-
   Loss on settlement of debt678,027-
   Employee option expense397,547-
Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) to net cash (used in) operating activities:
   Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities109,1764,590
   Decrease in related parties payable(260)4,439
   Increase in employees payable24,913-
   Decrease in amounts due from related party18,999(18,999)
   Increase in other receivables(19,079)(6,718)
Net cash used in operating activities(1,301,823)(110,694)
  
Investing Activities:
   Purchase of property and equipment(26,224)(1,456)
   Effect of reverse merger467,380-
Net cash provided by investing activities441,156(1,456)
  
Financing Activities:
   Proceeds from sale of common stock (net of issuance expenses)380,000-
   Issuance of short-term payable609,974117,629
Net cash provided by financing activities989,974(117,629)
   Foreign currency adjustment(28,269)8,932
  
Net increase (decrease) in cash101,03814,411
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period14,411-
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period$115,449$14,111
  
Non-cash transactions:
   Shares issued for reverse merger$547$-
   Debt settled with stock$91,687$-
   Stock receivable$-$297
   Discount on convertible note with embedded derivative$-$13,147
   Extinguishment on derivative$20,532$13,147
  
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


 
Emerald Medical Applications Corp.
Statement of Changes in Stockholders' Equity (Deficit)
For the Years December 31, 2015 and 2014
Back to Table of Contents

Additional

 OtherTotal
Common

Paid-in

StockComprehensiveAccumulatedstockholders'
SharesAmountCapitalPayableIncomeDeficitequity
Balance as of December 31, 2013

7,438,141

$

744

$

(744)

$

-

-

$

-

$

-

   Other comprehensive income----8,932-8,932
   Net loss for the year

-

-

-

-

-

(105,049)

(105,049)

Balance as of December 31, 2014

7,438,141

744

(744)

-

8,932

(105,049)

(96,117)

Common stock issued for cash1,252,500125459,875(80,000)--380,000
Debt converted into shares274,71927769,686---769,713
Shares issued for services885,98488885,896---885,984
Class B and C warrants for services--5,343,088---5,343,088
ESOP options--397,547---397,547
Effect of reverse merger5,474,545547876,83380,000--957,380
Other comprehensive income----(28,269)-(28,269)
Extinguishment on derivative--20,532---20,532
Net loss for the year

-

-

-

-

-

(8,756,267)

(8,756,267)

Balance as of December 31, 2015

15,325,889

$

1,533

$

8,752,711

$

-

(19,337)

$

(8,861,316)

$

(126,409)

    
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.


Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp.
Corp)

Statements of Comprehensive Loss

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

  Twelve months  Twelve months 
  ended  ended 
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
       
Revenues $-  $- 
         
Expenses:        
Research and development  (354,809)  (1,644,868)
General and administrative expenses  (911,581)  (3,749,867)
Total operating expenses  (1,266,390)  (5,394,735)
         
Loss from operations  (1,266,390)  (5,394,735)
         
Finance income (expense):        
Finance expense  (307,516)  (*)(750,462)
         
Net loss attributable to shareholders of the company $(1,573,906) $(*)(6,145,197)
Net loss attributable to shareholders of preferred stock  (39,491)    
Net loss used in the calculation of basic and diluted loss per share $

(1,534,415

) $(*)(6,145,197)
Basic and diluted net loss per share  (0.07)  (*)(0.32)
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic and diluted  

21,780,899

   18,966,032 

(*) Restated – see Note 10.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp)

Statements of Cash Flows

For the Twelve Months Ended December 31, 2017 and 2016

  Twelve months  Twelve months 
  ended  ended 
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Operating Activities:        
Net loss $(1,573,906)  $ (*)(6,145,197) 
Depreciation expense  17,513   12,422 
Interest and amortization of discount on convertible notes  350,208   369,588 
Shares issued for services  -   2,263,304 
Change in derivative liability  (336,272)  309,873 
Share based compensation  76,616   2,028,803 

Non cash finance, general and administrative expenses arising from

settlement with debt and warrant holders

  659,960   - 
         
Increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities  183,993   123,869 
Decrease in amounts due from related party  (40,339)  122,482 
Decrease in accrued interest  35,078   13,483 
Increase in other receivables  (2,866)  16,441)
Net cash used in operating activities  (630,015)  (858,533)
         
Investing Activities:        
Decrease (increase) in restricted cash  11,866   (11,925)
Purchase of fixed assets  -   (23,105)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities  11,866   (35,030)
         
Financing Activities:        
Issuance of common stock (net of issuance expenses)  536,613   47,600 
Issuance of short-term convertible notes  -   735,000 
Receipt on account of stock  80,000     
Net cash provided by financing activities  616,613   782,600 
Effect of exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents        
         
Net increase (decrease) in cash  (1,527)  (110,963)
Cash and cash equivalents - beginning of period  4,486   115,449 
Cash and cash equivalents - end of period $2,959  $4,486 
         
Non-cash transactions:        
Issuance of Preference Shares in connection with settlement with debt and warrant holders $529,000  $- 
Settlement agreement with debt and warrant holders accounted for as extinguishment and re issuance of debt:        
Extinguishment of convertible note  (470,200)    
Re issuance of convertible note  606,160   - 

(*) Restated – see Note 10.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

25

Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp)

Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficit

For the Years December 31, 2017 and 2016

  Common  Preferred  Additional Paid-in  Receipt on
Account of
  Other
Comprehensive
  Accumulated  Total
stockholders’
 
  Shares  Amount  Stock  Amount  Capital  Shares  Income  Deficit  deficit 
Balance as of December 31, 2016  19,931,478  $1,994   -  $-  $13,826,957  $-  $(19,337) $(**)(15,046,513)  $(1,236,899)
Common stock issued for cash  1,315,563   132   -   -   526,081   -   -   -   526,213 
Cashless exercise of Warrants  1,096,395   110   -   -   (110)   -   -   -   - 
Conversion of Convertible Note to shares  74,572   7   -   -   10,393   -   -   -   10,400 
Issuance of Ordinary Shares  125,000   12   -   -   (12)  -   -   -   - 
Issuance of Preferred Stock          529   (*)   529,000   -   -   -   529,000 
Receipt on Account of Shares          -   -   -   80,000   -   -   80,000 
Share based compensation  -   -   -   -   76,616   -   -   -   76,616 
Net loss for the year  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   (1,573,906)  (1,573,906)
Balance as of December 31, 2017  22,543,008  $2,255   529  $-  $14,968,925  $80,000  $(19,337) $(16,620,419) $(1,588,576)

(*) less than $1

(**) Restated – see Note 10.

26

Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc (Formerly Emerald Medical Applications Corp)

Notes to Financial Statements
December 31, 2015
Back to Table of Contents2017

Note 1. The Company and Significant Accounting Policies.

Organizational Background:

Emerald Medical Applications Corp. ("Corp (the “Company” or “Registrant”), was incorporated in the Company") (f/k/State of Ohio in 1989 under a predecessor name, Zaxis International Inc. (“Zaxis”) was incorporated in Ohio in 1989.. On August 25, 1995, Zaxis merged with a subsidiary of The InFerGene Company, ("InFerGene") and InFerGenea Delaware corporation, which entity changed its name to Zaxis International Inc. and the Company was reincorporated in Delaware as Zaxis. On December 30, 2014, Zaxis entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with Emerald Medical Applications Corp. InFerGeneLtd., which was then a private limited liability company incorporated in California in 1984 and subsequently changed its domicile in connection withunder the merger intolaws of the State of Israel (“Emerald Israel” or “Emerald”). On March 16, 2015, Zaxis to Delaware in 1985. Operations ceased operations in 2002. In November 2002, the Company and its subsidiaries filed a petition for bankruptcy in the U.S. Bankruptcy Court Northern District of Ohio. On October 13, 2004, the Company emerged from bankruptcy.

The MOU provides that the Registrant and Emerald will enter into a reverse merger (the "Reverse Merger"), subject to the execution of a definitive agreement (the "Definitive Agreement"). The execution of Definitive Agreement and the closing of the Reverse Merger will be subject to the Registrant's raise of $800,000 from third party investors, including but not limited to the Registrant's existing stockholders (the "Investors"), at terms and conditions to be agreed upon by the Registrant and Emerald.

Upon the closing, the holders of Emerald's capital stock will receive in exchange a number of shares of the Registrant's common stock equal to 45% of the Registrant's issued and outstanding common stock on a fully-diluted basis as at immediately following the closing of the Reverse Merger, excluding Registrant's securities to be issued to the Investors upon exercise of warrants issued to the Investors within the framework of the Reverse Merger. In addition, Emerald's holders will be issued up to an additional 21% of the Registrant's common stock in three equal tranches of 7% of the Registrant's issued and outstanding common stock as at immediately following the closing of the Reverse Merger, subject to Emerald's achievement of certain milestones to be set forth in the Definitive Agreement.

On July 14, 2015 the closing ofIsrael executed the Share Exchange Agreement, which closed on July 14, 2015. The Share Exchange Agreement was held (the "Closing") andaccounted for as a reverse recapitalization. As a result, the historical financial statements of the Registrant were replaced with the historical financial statements of Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. becameIsrael.

The Company and its subsidiary, Emerald, are collectively referred to as the “Company”.

Emerald, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Registrant.

Utilizing capital raised prior to and subsequent to the closing of the Share Exchange Agreement, Emerald completed the development ofRegistrant effective July 14, 2015, was organized as a commercial model of its DermaCompare Product and has commenced marketing efforts. Emerald is continuing to negotiate additional distribution agreements for territories including North America, Latin America, Southern Africa, Israel and elsewhere in Europe, among other countries and regions. Emerald expects to generate significant revenues from its DermaCompare Technology commencing in the first half of fiscal 2016. Emerald is continuing to work on development of the "next generation" DermaCompare Technology, with enhanced features.

Subsequently to the Closing Mr. Lior Wayn has been appointed as the Company's CEO, and has been granted considerable influence on the appointment of new directors thereby creating a new management structure for theprivately-owned company replacing the old management. Additionally Mr. Wayn is to receive additional shares in the future contingent on the Company achieving commercial milestone. Thus the new management, headed by Mr. Wayn, is considered to be in control of more than 50% of the company and with the ability to make all management decisions.

Emerald is a company organized under the laws of the State of Israel on February 17, 2010. Emerald is digital health Startup Companya mobile digital-health startup company engaged in the development, sale and service of imaging solutions utilizing its proprietary DermaCompare software that it developed for use in derma imaging and analytics ("DermaCompare"(“DermaCompare”). Emerald believes that its proprietary DermaCompare software represents an advancement in skin cancer screening that should enable physicians to more readily identify and monitor changes in their patients'patients’ skin characteristics.

Emerald's

Emerald’s DermaCompare solution allows dermatologists and other medical care professionals, using a set of 25 total body photography ("TBP"(“TBP”), to capture sets of skin lesion images with, among other devices, digital cameras, camera-equipped smartphonessmart phones or tablets. These TBP images are then transmitted online and are remotely analyzed by professionals using our DermaCompare software.

Emerald's sales

Beginning in July 2017, the Company commenced a process of outsourcing the development and marketing plan ismaintenance of our patented DermaCompare imaging solution to sell licensesa major Israeli software company, which company has been involved in the continued development of our technology. The purpose for our imaging software to: NHSs, HMOs, health insurance companies, hospitalsthis outsourcing was to conserve the Company’s capital resources. Certain key external consultants and medical clinics through distributers, health care channel partners or directly through independent salespersons and/or web purchaseprofessionals continue to dermatologistsassist and other physicians (GPs) that we expect to purchase licenses based on the number of potential numbers of patients.

Basis of Presentation:

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation ofserve the Company as we advance the implementation of our marketing plan. As of December 31, 2017, and the date of this report, the Company has no employees on its payroll. However, certain liabilities with respect to payroll and severance payments remain outstanding.

On January 29, 2018, the Company ceased its DermaCompare operations and is currently in the process of liquidating Emerald Israel.The Company commenced a going concern. new business operation in January 2018 under its newly-formed Israeli subsidiary, Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd. To fund the new operations and to satisfy its existing debts, the Company raised approximately $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2018. Refer to subsequent event note 11.

Going Concern:

The Company has not established any sourceincurred significant operating losses and negative cash flows from operating activities in relation to its DermaCompare operations, since incorporation. The Companyraised approximately $1.9 million in the first quarter of revenue2018, however, it will be required to coverobtain additional liquidity resources in order to support the commercialization of its operating costs,new operations and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of December 31, 2015, the cash resources ofmaintain its research and development activities. The Company is addressing its liquidity needs by seeking additional funding from public and/or private sources. There are no assurances, however, that the Company were insufficientwill be able to meet its current business plan,obtain an adequate level of financial resources that are required for the short and the Company had negative working capital. long-term requirements.

These and other factorsconditions raise substantial doubt about the Company'sCompany’s ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanyingconsolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inabilityoutcome of this uncertainty. Such adjustments would have been required as of December 31 2017 had the Company not successfully completed the $1.9 million funding in the first quarter of 2018. Since the Company's balance sheet as of December 31 2017 is substantially comprised of financial instruments with carrying values that approximate liquidation values (cash and cash equivalents, short term accounts payable and accrued expenses, debt and  related accrued interest presented at repayment amounts as well as derivative warrant liabilities with immaterial carrying and fair values), other than the reclassification of long term liabilities to continueshort term, such adjustments would have been immaterial as a going concern.of December 31 2017.

Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates:

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from the estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

For financial statement presentation purposes, the Company considers those short-term, highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less to be cash or cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of December 31, 20152017 and December 31, 2014.2016.

PropertyOther Receivables

The Company treats VAT refunds claimed, resulting from excess VAT paid over VAT received, as other receivables.

Currency Translation and Equipment:other Comprehensive Income

The functional currency of the Virtual Crypto Technologies Inc. is the U.S dollar (“dollar”) since the dollar is the currency of the primary economic environment in which the Company has operated and expects to continue to operate in the foreseeable future. Transactions and balances denominated in dollars are presented at their original amounts. Transactions and balances denominated in foreign currencies have been re-measured to dollars in accordance with the provisions of ASC 830-10, “Foreign Currency Translation”. All transaction gains and losses from re-measurement of monetary balance sheet items denominated in non-dollar currencies are reflected in the statement of operations as financial income or expenses, as appropriate.

Fixed assets:

New property and equipment are recorded at cost. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 56 years. Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for minor items, repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Gain or loss upon sale or retirement due to obsolescence is reflected in the operating results in the period the event takes place.

Valuation of Long-Lived Assets: 

We review the recoverability of our long-lived assets including equipment, goodwill and other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows (undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair value and carrying value. Our primary measure of fair value is based on discounted cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires management to make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as other fair value determinations.

Stock Based Compensation: 

Stock-based awards are accounted for using the fair value method in accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments. Our primary type of share-based compensation consists of stock options. We use the Black-Scholes option pricing model in valuing options. The inputs for the valuation analysis of the options include the market value of the Company's common stock, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock, the exercise price of the warrants and the risk free interest rate.

Accounting For Obligations And Instruments Potentially To Be Settled In The Company'sCompany’s Own Stock:

We account for obligations and instruments potentially to be settled in the Company'sCompany’s stock in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments. This issueguidance addresses the initial balance sheet classification and measurement of contracts that are indexed to, and potentially settled in, the Company'sCompany’s own stock.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments:

FASB ASC 825, "Financial“Financial Instruments," requires entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate fair value. FASB ASC 825 defines fair value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At December 31, 20152017 and 2014,2016, the carrying value of certain financial instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued expenses.) approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the instruments or interest rates, which are comparable with current rates.

Fair Value Measurements:

The Company measures its derivative warrant liabilities at fair value at each period. The Company adopted the FASB standard related to fair value measurement at inception. The standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure of fair value measurements. The standard applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements and, accordingly, does not require any new fair value measurements. The standard clarifies that fair value is an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

As a basis for considering such assumptions, the standard established a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows.

Level 1. Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets;

Level 2. Inputs, other than quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3. Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The Company values its

Accounting For Convertible Debt Instruments

We account for convertible debt instruments, which do not meet the definition of a derivative instruments related to embedded conversion featuresfinancial instrument per FASB ASC 815, Accounting for Derivative Financial Instruments, in accordance with FASB ASC 470-20, Debt with Conversion and warrantsOther Options. This guidance addresses the allocation of proceeds from the issuance of convertible debenturesdebt into its equity and debt components. Discount on the debt component resulting from allocation of proceeds to the equity component is amortized in accordancethe profit and loss statement as finance expense.

Allocation of proceeds into equity and debt components of convertible notes issued together with the Level 3 guidelines. For the twelve-month period ended December 31, 2015, 2015 and 2014, the following table reconciles the beginning and ending balances forother detachable financial instruments that are recognized at fair valueis performed, in these consolidated financial statements. Therelation to the proceeds allocated to the convertible notes, based on the relative fair value of embedded conversion featuressuch convertible notes and the other detachable financial instruments issued.

Share-based compensation

The Company applies ASC 718-10, “Share-Based Payment,” which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expenses for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors (including employee stock options under the Company’s stock plans) based on estimated fair values.

ASC 718-10 requires companies to estimate the fair value of equity-based payment awards on the date of grant. The value of the portion of the award that have floating conversion features and tainted commonis ultimately expected to vest is recognized as an expense over the requisite service periods in the Company’s statement of operations.

The Company recognizes compensation expenses for the value of non-employee awards based on the straight-line method over the requisite service period of each award, net of estimated forfeitures.

The Company estimates the fair value of stock equivalents (warrants and convertible debt) are estimatedoptions granted as equity awards using a Binomial LatticeBlack-Scholes options pricing model. The key inputsoption-pricing model requires a number of assumptions, of which the most significant are share price, expected volatility and the expected option term (the time from the grant date until the options are exercised or expire). Expected volatility is estimated based on volatility of similar companies in the technology sector. The Company has historically not paid dividends and has no foreseeable plans to this valuation model as of December 31, 2014, were: Volatility of 143.9%issue dividends. The risk-free interest rate is based on the yield from governmental zero-coupon bonds with an equivalent term. The expected option term is calculated for options granted to employees and directors using the twelve-period ended December 31, 2015 and 132.4% for“simplified” method. Grants to non-employees are based on the twelve months period ending December 31, 2014, inherent term of instruments equal to the remaining contractual term, quoted closing stock prices on valuation dates, and various settlement scenarios and probability percentages summing to 100%.

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015

Level 3 - Derivative liabilities from: Balance at
December 31, 2015
 New Issuances Extinguishment Change in Fair Value Balance at
December 31, 2015
Convertible Note $20,532 $- $(20,532)  - $-

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014

Level 3 - Derivative liabilities from:  Balance at
December 31, 2014
  New Issuances  Settlements  Change in Fair Value  Balance at
December 31, 2014
Convertible Note $- $13,147 $-  7,385 $20,532

term. Changes in the unobservable input values would likely cause material changes indetermination of each of the inputs can affect the fair value of the Company's Level 3 financial instruments. The significant unobservable input usedoptions granted and the results of operations of the Company.

Earnings per Common Share

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss, as adjusted to include the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Common shares and preferred shares contingently issuable for little or no cash are included in basic net loss per share on an as issued basis.

Diluted net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss, as adjusted to include preferred shares dividend participation rights of preferred shares outstanding during the fair value measurement is the estimation for probability percentages assigned to future expected settlement possibilities. A significant increase (decrease) in this distribution of percentages would result in a higher (lower) fair value measurement.

The following table presents assets and liabilities that were measured and recognized at fair valueyear as well as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 andpreferred shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive preferred shares had been issued, by the years then ended on a recurring basis:

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year, plus the number of common shares that would have been outstanding if all potentially dilutive common shares had been issued, using the treasury stock method, in accordance with ASC 260-10 “Earnings per Share”.

 

 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Unrealized (Gain) Loss
12/31/15 Derivative Liability$- $- $- $-
12/31/14 Derivative Liability$- $- $20,532 $7,385

The following schedule summarizesAll outstanding stock options and warrants have been excluded from the valuationcalculation of financial instruments at fair value on a recurring basis in the balance sheets as of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014:

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015

Level 3
Assets
Total Assets$-
Liabilities
Derivative liability$-
Total Liabilities$-

Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2014

Level 3
Assets  
Total Assets$-
   
Liabilities  
Derivative liability$20,532
Total Liabilities$20,532

The fair values of our debts are deemed to approximate book value, and are considered Level 2 inputs as defined by ASC Topic 820-10-35.

There were no transfers of financial assets or liabilities between Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 inputsdiluted loss per share for the years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014.

The Company had no other assets or liabilities valued at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis as of December 31, 2015 or December 31, 2014.2016, since all such securities have an anti-dilutive effect.

Research and development expenses, net:

Research and development expenses are charged to the statement of operations as incurred. Grants for funding of approved research and development projects are recognized at the time the Company is entitled to such grants, on the basis of the costs incurred and applied as a deduction from the research and development expenses.

Income Taxes:

We have adopted FASB ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Pursuant to ASC 740, we are required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.

We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize benefit from the reversal of temporary differences and from net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our net deferred tax asset. Management will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax asset and its related valuation allowance. If our assessment of the deferred tax assets or the corresponding valuation allowance were to change, we would record the related adjustment to income during the period in which we make the determination. Our tax rate may also vary based on our results and the mix of income or loss in domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate.

In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we will reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We will record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.

ASC 740 which requires recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income tax is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized.

Uncertain Tax Positions:

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained. In accordance with the guidance of FASB ASC 740-10, Accounting for Uncertain Income Tax Positions, the benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any. Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions. Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority. The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above should be reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2011. We are not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. At December 31, 2015 we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under FIN 48.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015,

The Company assesses the FASBadoption impacts of recently issued ASU No. 2015-16, Business Combinations (Topic 805) ("ASU 2015-16"). Topic 805 requires that an acquirer retrospectively adjust provisional amounts recognized in a business combination, during the measurement period. To simplify the accounting for adjustments made to provisional amounts, the amendments in the Update require that the acquirer recognize adjustments to provisional amounts that are identified during the measurement period in the reporting period in which the adjustment amount is determined. The acquirer is required to also record, in the same period's financial statements, the effect on earnings of changes in depreciation, amortization, or other income effects, if any, as a result of the change to the provisional amounts, calculated as if the accounting had been completed at the acquisition date. In addition an entity is required to present separately on the face of the income statement or disclose in the notes to the financial statements the portion of the amount recorded in current-period earningsstandards by line item that would have been recorded in previous reporting periods if the adjustment to the provisional amounts had been recognized as of the acquisition date. ASU 2015-16 is effective for fiscal years beginning December 15, 2015. The adoption of ASU 2015-016 is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date ("ASU 2015-14"). The amendment in this ASU defers the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 for all entities for one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. Earlier application is permitted only as of annual reporting periods beginning after December 31, 2016, including interim reporting periods with that reporting period.

In April 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB"on its financial statements. Following are newly issued standards or material updates to the Company’s previous assessments from its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016:

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2015-03, Interest-Imputationa new standard to achieve a consistent application of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) ("ASU 2015-03")revenue recognition within the U.S., resulting in a single revenue model to be applied by reporting companies under U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Under the new model, recognition of revenue occurs when a customer obtains control of the promised goods or services in an amount that reflects the consideration to which changes the presentationentity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, the new standard requires that reporting companies disclose the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of debt issuance costs in financial statements. ASU 2015-03 requires an entityrevenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. The new standard is effective with respect to present such coststhe Company beginning in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the related debt liability rather than as an asset. Amortizationfirst quarter of the costs will continue to be reported as interest expense. It is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. Early2018; early adoption is permitted.prohibited. The new guidance willstandard is required to be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented. The Company is currently inpresented or retrospectively with the process of evaluating the impact of adoption of ASU 2015-03 on its balance sheets.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-16-Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): Determining Whether the Host Contract in a Hybrid Financial Instrument Issued in the Form of a Share Is More Akin to Debt or to Equity (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update do not change the current criteria in GAAP for determining when separation of certain embedded derivative features in a hybrid financial instrument is required. That is, an entity will continue to evaluate whether the economic characteristics and risks of the embedded derivative feature are clearly and closely related to those of the host contract, among other relevant criteria. The amendments clarify how current GAAP should be interpreted in evaluating the economic characteristics and risks of a host contract in a hybrid financial instrument that is issued in the form of a share. The effectscumulative effect of initially adopting the amendments in this Update should be applied on a modified retrospective basis to existing hybrid financial instruments issued in the form of a share as of the beginning of the fiscal year for which the amendments are effective. Retrospective application is permitted to all relevant prior periods.

On November 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-17-Business Combinations (Topic 805): Pushdown Accounting (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The amendments in this Update provide an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. The amendments in this Update are effective on November 18, 2014. After the effective date, an acquired entity can make an election to apply the guidance to future change-in-control events or to its most recent change-in-control event. However, if the financial statements for the period in which the most recent change-in-control event occurred already have been issued or made available to be issued, the application of this guidance would be a change in accounting principle.

On August 2014, The Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standard Update No. 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concerns (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosures of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The amendments require management to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management's plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year afterapplying it recognized at the date thatof initial application. As the financial statements are issued (or availableCompany has not incurred revenues to be issued). The amendments in this Update are effective fordate, it does not expect the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2014-10, "Development Stage Entities". The amendments in this update remove the definition of a development stage entity from the Master Glossary of the ASC thereby removing the financial reporting distinction between development stage entities and other reporting entities from U.S. GAAP.  In addition, the amendments eliminate the requirements for development stage entities to (1) present inception-to-date information in the statements of income, cash flows, and shareholder equity, (2) label the financial statements as those of a development stage entity, (3) disclose a description of the development stage activities in which the entity is engaged, and (4) disclose in the first year in which the entity is no longer a development stage entity that in prior years it had been in the development stage. The amendments in this update are applied retrospectively. The adoption of ASU 2014-10 removed the development stage entity financial reporting requirements from the Company.

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period. The new guidance requires that share-based compensation that require a specific performance target to be achieved in order for employees to become eligible to vest in the awards and that could be achieved after an employee completes the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant-date fair value of the award. Compensation costs should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the period(s) for which the requisite service has already been rendered. If the performance target becomes probable of being achieved before the end of the requisite service period, the remaining unrecognized compensation cost should be recognized prospectively over the remaining requisite service period. The total amount of compensation cost recognized during and after the requisite service period should reflect the number of awards that are expected to vest and should be adjusted to reflect those awards that ultimately vest. The requisite service period ends when the employee can cease rendering service and still be eligible to vest in the award if the performance target is achieved. This new guidance is effective for fiscal years and interim periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2015. Early adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this Update either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. The adoption of ASU 2014-12 is not expectedstandard to have a material impact on ourits consolidated financial position or results of operations.statements.

In June 2014,February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-10: Development Stage Entities (Topic 915): Eliminationa new lease accounting standard requiring the recognition of Certain Financial Reporting Requirements, Including an Amendment to Variable Interest Entities Guidance in Topic 810, Consolidation , to improve financial reporting by reducing the costlease assets and complexity associated with the incremental reporting requirements of development stage entities. The amendments in this update remove all incremental financial reporting requirements from U.S. GAAP for development stage entities, thereby improving financial reporting by eliminating the cost and complexity associated with providing that information. The amendments in this Update also eliminate an exception provided to development stage entities in Topic 810, Consolidation, for determining whether an entity is a variable interest entityliabilities on the basis of the amount of investment equity thatbalance sheet. This standard is at risk. The amendments to eliminate that exception simplify U.S. GAAP by reducing avoidable complexity in existing accounting literature and improve the relevance of information provided to financial statement users by requiring the application of the same consolidation guidance by all reporting entities. The elimination of the exception may change the consolidation analysis, consolidation decision, and disclosure requirements for a reporting entity that has an interest in an entityeffective beginning in the development stage. The amendments related to the eliminationfirst quarter of inception-to-date information and the other remaining disclosure requirements of Topic 915 should be applied retrospectively except for the clarification to Topic 275, which shall be applied prospectively. For public companies, those amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods therein. Early2019; early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2014-10 is not expectedthis standard to have a material impact on ourits consolidated financial positionstatements. As the Company currently is not a party to any leasing arrangement, it does not expect the new standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments.” With respect to assets measured at amortized cost, such as held-to-maturity assets, the update requires presentation of the amortized cost net of a credit loss allowance. The update eliminates the probable initial recognition threshold that was previously required prior to recognizing a credit loss on financial instruments. The credit loss estimate can now reflect an entity’s current estimate of all future expected credit losses as opposed to the previous standard, when an entity only considered past events and current conditions. With respect to available for sale debt securities, the update requires that credit losses be presented as an allowance rather than as a write-down. The update is effective beginning in the first quarter of 2020; early adoption is permitted. As the Company has insignificant receivable balances, The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued “ASU No. 2017-09, “Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting,” which clarifies when a change to terms or resultsconditions of operations.a share-based payment award must be accounted for as a modification. The new guidance requires modification accounting if the vesting condition, fair value or the award classification is not the same both before and after a change to the terms and conditions of the award. The new guidance is effective on a prospective basis beginning on January 1, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of this standard to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, which includes Part I “Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features” and Part II “Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Non-Controlling Interests With a Scope Exception”. The ASU makes limited changes to the Board’s guidance on classifying certain financial instruments as either liabilities or equity. The ASU’s objective is to improve (1) the accounting for instruments with “down-round” provisions and (2) the readability of the guidance in ASC 480 on distinguishing liabilities from equity by replacing the indefinite deferral of certain pending content with scope exceptions. This standard is effective beginning in the first quarter of 2019; early adoption is permitted. The Company early adopted the standard, retrospectively, for each prior period presented in these financial statements.

Note 2. Going Concern.Other Receivables.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as

As of December 31, 20152017, and December 31, 2016, the cash resourcesCompany had other receivables of the company were insufficient to meet its current business plan$12,222 and the company has negative working capital. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result$9,356, respectively, which represent VAT refunds claimed resulting from excess VAT paid over VAT received from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.Israeli government.

Note 3. Stockholders' Equity.

On January 8, 2015 the shareholders approved a resolution to increase the authorized common shares from 100,000,000 to 490,000,000 shares. All other provisions of the common shares remain unchanged. Also on that date, the Company declared a reverse split of common stock at the ration of 1:4. The stock split was effective January 8, 2015 for holders of record as of that date. Except as otherwise noted, all share, option and warrant numbers have been restated to give retroactive effect to this split. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the reverse split had occurred at January 1, 2012.

Recent Issuances of Common Stock

During the year ended December 31, 2014 we issued 4,125,000 shares of our common stock (16,500,000 pre-reverse stock split) in exchange for converting $125,000 of promissory notes.

Between January 15, 2015 and March 15, 2015 the Company sold a total of 2,052,000 units for cash consideration of $780,000 at a price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $351,433 for the common stock and $428,567 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with 153% volatility and discount rates ranging between 0.44% to 0.7%. These units were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger.

Between April 1, 2015 and June 29, 2015 the Company sold a total of 1,012,500 units for cash consideration of $405,000 at a price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $158,123 for the common stock and $246,877 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility ranging between163% - 177% and discount rates ranging between 0.54% to 0.71%. These units were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger.

On July 21, 2015 the Company sold a total of 140,000 units for cash consideration of $15,000 at price of $0.107 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $4,294 for the common stock and $10,706 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 153% and discount rates of 0.61%. These units were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger.

Between July 1, 2015 and September 30, 2015 the Company sold a total of 862,500 units for cash consideration of $345,000 at price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $118,415 for the common stock and $226,585 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility ranging between 153% - 182% and discount rates ranging between 0.54% to 0.71%. Of these units $65,000 were issued as stock payable and the cash from sale of units was not received for the sale of stock pre-reverse merger and $280,000 cash was received subsequent to Closing of the reverse merger.

On July 31, 2015 and July 30, 2015 the Company issued 517,900 shares to one service provider and a total of 100,000 shares to two service providers, respectively, for services valued at a total value of $617,900, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $1.00 per Nasdaq.com.

On July 16, 2015 five Emerald debt holders in amount of $87,910 converted their debt into 274,719 units at a conversion price of $0.32 per unit, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The Loss on Settlement of Debt recorded is $678,027.

On July 14, 2015 the Company issued Emerald's CEO and founder, Lior Wayn, 5,474,545 shares as per the share purchase agreement valued at $877,380, valued on the date of grant for the price of common stock.

On July 16, 2015 consultants were issued 2,500,000 Class B Warrants exercisable for a two-year period to acquire one (1) share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share; The fair value of these warrants is $2,199,507. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 182% and discount rate of 0.67%. The Class B warrants are fully vested and were accordingly included in expenses as stock based compensation.

On July 16, 2015 consultants were issued 2,536,247 Class C Warrants exercisable for a 90 day period, commencing 90 days after the effective date of this Registration Statement, at an exercise price of $0.40 to acquire one (1) share of Common Stock and one (1) Class A Warrant at an exercise price of $0.80. The fair value of these warrants is $3,143,581. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 182% and discount rate of 0.67%. The Class C warrants are fully vested and were accordingly included in expenses as stock based compensation.

On November 17, 2015, the Company sold 250,000 units for cash consideration of $100,000 at price of $0.40 (the "Units"), each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 month. The relative fair value of the stock with embedded warrants was $41,304 for the common stock and $58,696 for the class A warrants. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes model with volatility of 149% and a discount rate of 0.50%.

Between November 5, 2015 and November 16, 2015 the Company issued 268,084 shares to three service providers and for services valued at a total value of $268,084, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $1.00 per Nasdaq.com.

On October 1, 2015 the company granted a total of 534,400 stock options (the "Options") to three company employees. The options vest over 5 quarters and are exercisable at prices ranging from $0.01 to $0.40 per Share. The options were valued using the Black-Scholes model with 149% volatility and 0.67% discount rate for a total value of $528,857. Of this amount, $397,547 was expensed in Q4 2015 with the remaining balance to be expensed in 2016.

Recent Option Grants

During 2015, we granted 534,400 options at an exercise price ranging between $0.01 and $0.40.

Name of GranteeDate of GrantNumber of OptionsExercise PriceBasis for Grant
Adir Zamir (1)12/02/2015409,600$0.01 per shareServices
Ilan Sina (1)12/02/201592,160$0.20 per shareServices
Guy Salman (1)12/02/201532,640$0.40 per shareServices
Total Options Granted534,400

(1) Options were granted to these employees, none of which have been exercised to date.

Note 4. Related Party Transactions.

On March 25, 2014, our President and principal shareholder assigned accumulated advances and accruals totaling $124,229, to an unaffiliated third party. The advances carry no specific terms of repayment. On December 15, 2014, $22,375 of the then outstanding balance was converted to a promissory note (see Note 4 below). A summary of transactions is as follows:

 December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Beginning balance$-$161,729
Increase due to payments made on behalf of the company$-$21,625
Less March 24, 2014 conversion to convertible note$-$(40,000)
Less December 15, 2014 conversion to promissory note$-$(22,375)
Obligation transferred to unrelated party$-$(120,979)
Total--
Less current portion--
Due after one year$-$-

There was no stated term of interest associated with this obligation. Accordingly, the company imputed interest at an appropriate rate estimated at 8% as prescribed under FASB ASC 835. For the period ending December 31, 2014 the resultant charge of $11,210 to interest expense was considered a contribution of capital.

During the second quarter an agreement was reached with the holder of a $120,979 advance payable note to settle the full amount due for $30,000, and interest due. The settlement with all note holders resulted in $528 loss on debt settlement due to the payment being higher than principal and accrued interest as of the settlement date as well as a charge of $90,979, that was considered a contribution of capital due to the fact that note holder, IMWT, was a related party.

Former CEO of the Company whom during November 2014 loaned amount to company of $19,521, an interest rate of 8% per annum converted the balance to shares as described in Note 3. Accounts Payable and Accrued Liabilities.

On July 16, 2015 five Emerald debt holders in amount of $87,910 converted their debt into 274,719 units at a conversion price of $0.32 per unit, each unit comprised of one share of common stock and one Class A warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term of 24 month. The Loss on Settlement of Debt recorded is $678,027, on the income statement.

On July 14, 2015 the Company issued Emerald's CEO and founder, Lior Wayn, 5,474,545 shares as per the share purchase agreement valued at $877,380, valued on the date of grant using the closing price of common stock on that date.

The Company's CEO, Lior Wayn was owed $3,480 and $0 payable asAs of December 31, 20152017, and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Following2016 the closingCompany had accounts payable and accrued liabilities of the reverse merger, the $490,000 loan from Emerald Medical Applications Corp. to Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. was rendered an intercompany loan$445,653 and $198,795, respectively, which mainly represent accrued expenses such as such was written off.accrued vacation and deferred salary (see Note 8 for further details).

Note 4. Employees Payable.

As of December 31, 2017, and 2016, the total amount owing to employees was $98,476 and $161,341. The amount owing as of December 31, 2017 includes amounts owing to employees in respect of the litigation against Emerald Israel. Reference is made to Note 8 below.

Note 5. Employee Payable.Notes Payable

For the periods ended

Notes payable and accrued interest as of December 31, 2015,2017 and 2016 are as follows:

  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
       
Principle $920,484  $745,860 
Discount  -   (306,529) 
Accrued interest  71,162   32,768 
Total  991,646   472,099 

Issuances of convertibles notes during 2016 and 2017

On March 24, 2016, a convertible note payable and Class A warrants to purchase 187,500 common shares were issued to GoldMed Ltd for a consideration of $75,000 The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is convertible through March 23, 2017. The exercise price of the Company hadwarrant is $0.80 and expires 12 months after issuance. The warrants and the beneficial conversion feature were valued at $75,000, which resulted in a total$75,000 discount recorded as a reduction of $29,092debt and an increase to additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized in finance expense over the term of the note.

On April 11, 2016, a convertible note payable and Class A warrants to purchase 200,000 common shares were issued to Maz Partner. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is convertible through April 10, 2017. The exercise price of the warrant is $0.80 and expires 12 months after issuance. The warrants and the beneficial conversion feature were valued at $80,000, which $3,480resulted in a $80,000 discount recorded as a reduction of debt and an increase to additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized in finance expense over the term of the note.

On June 20, 2016, a convertible note payable and Class A warrants to purchase 1,000,000 common shares and Class B warrants to purchase 1,000,000 common shares were related partyissued to Alpha Anstalt Capital (“Alpha”). The note bears interest at 8% per annum and $25,612is convertible through June 19, 2017. The exercise price of the Class A warrants is $0.80 and expires 12 months after issuance and the exercise price of Class B warrants is $0.80 and expires 60 months after issuance. The warrants and the beneficial conversion feature were unrelated party employeevalued at $440,000, which resulted in a $440,000 discount recorded as a reduction of debt and an increase to additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized in finance expense over the term of the note.

On June 30, 2016, a convertible note payable relatedand Class A warrants to purchase 100,000 common shares were issued to Ilan Malka. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is convertible through June 29, 2017. The exercise price of the monthly wageswarrant is $0.80. The warrants and the embedded beneficial conversion feature were valued at $40,000, which resulted in a $40,000 discount recorded as a reduction of debt and an increase to additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized in finance expense over the term of the note.

On July 7, 2016, a convertible note payable and Class A warrants to purchase 250,000 common shares and Class B warrants to purchase 250,000 were was issued to Firstfire Global Opportunities Fund LTC (“Firstfire”). The exercise price of the Company's employees. ForClass A warrants is $0.80 and expires 12 months after issuance and the periods ended December 31, 2014,exercise price of Class B warrants is $0.80 and expires 60 months after issuance. The warrants and the Company had $0beneficial conversion feature were valued at $100,000, which resulted in employee payable relateda $100,000 discount recorded as a reduction of debt and an increase to additional paid in capital. The discount is amortized in finance expense over the monthly wages payableterm of the note. The note bears interest at 8% per annum and is convertible through July 6, 2017.

The terms of the convertibles note and warrants to the Company's employees.Alpha Capital and Firstfire Global Opportunities Fund LTC

Note 6. Notes Payable.

Convertible Notes Payable

In accordance to ASC #815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, we evaluated the holder's non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause, contained in the terms governing the Note to determine whether the features qualify as an embedded derivative instruments at issuance. Such non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause did not need to be accounted for as derivative financial instruments. Additionally, since theThe conversion price of the loans and the exercise price of Class A warrants and Class B warrants issued to Alpha and Firstfire, which had an exercise price of $0.80, were adjusted to $0.14, based on the Company’s share price on the 275th calendar day after the issuance date in accordance with the original provisions of the agreement. The exercise price is subject to certain adjustments, including down round protection.

In July 2016, the Company granted an option to Alpha and Chi Squared (the “Alpha Chi Option”) to purchase Notes for an aggregate of up to $385,000 (up to $350,000 for Alpha and up to $35,000 for Chi Squared Capital Inc.) (“Option Notes”) and Warrants (“Option Warrants”) substantially identical to the Notes and Warrants issued. The Company accounts for the Alpha Chi Option as derivative liabilities that are measured at their far value at each period end as further detailed below.

The above-referenced convertible notes were due during 2017. A settlement agreement was reached with Alpha and Chi Squared Capital Inc. on August 7, 2017, as described below, and agreements were reached with other convertible note was lowerholders in 2018 as detailed in Note 11, Subsequent Events.

Settlement Agreement

Effective August 7, 2017, the Company entered into the settlement agreement with Alpha and Chi Squared Capital Inc. as a result of the fact that Alpha and Chi Squared had taken the position that certain defaults may have occurred as a result of actions and/or inactions by the Company with respect to the Company’s obligations under convertible notes (the “Notes”) issued during 2016, which the Company did not deem to be defaults (the “Settlement Agreement”).

Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement, the Notes, which had originally provided for a maturity date of June 19, 2017 and were in the original principal amounts of $400,000 and $40,000, respectively, were extended until June 19, 2019, in consideration for which the Company agreed to an increase in the principal amounts to $551,600 and $55,160, respectively, both of which retain the adjusted conversion price of $0.14, calculated in accordance with the terms of the original Notes. Such conversion price is subject adjustments in the event of future financing at a price of less than $0.14 per share. As a further part of the settlement, the Company agreed to issue Alpha and Chi Squared a total of 528.82 newly authorized shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock having a stated value and liquidation preference of $1,000 per share, and are convertible into a total of 3,778,647 shares based upon a conversion price of $0.14 per share, subject to adjustment in the event of a future financing such that the amount of ordinary shares to be issued pursuant to conversion of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will represent the value of $1,000, per 1 Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, based on a conversion price which is identical to the ordinary share price at which securities are offered in such future financing. The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock shall be entitled to receive dividends on the same basis as Ordinary Shares and shall have no voting rights.

As part of the Settlement Agreement, the Company extended the Alpha Chi Option to July 15, 2018.

The settlement was accounted for as extinguishment of the pre-settlement notes and re issuance of the Notes and Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. As a result of the Settlement Agreement, the Company recorded a charge to general and administrative expenses in the Statement of Operation Losses of $440,684 representing the penalties and liquidation damages portion of the above-mentioned provision, and $219,276 was charged to finance expenses in the Statement of Operating Losses. The Series A Convertible Preferred Stock were recorded in shareholders’ equity at their fair marketvalue at the effective date of the settlement. As the Company concluded the conversion feature embedded in the amended notes is not a beneficial conversion feature pursuant to the provisions of ASC 470-20 (“Debt with Conversion and Other Options”), the post amendment carrying amount of the convertible notes, which was based on the fair value of the Company's common stockconvertible notes at the timeeffective date of issuance, no beneficial conversion feature exists if the lender electedsettlement, was recorded in liabilities in its entirely.

The Company accounts for options to convert. Based onpurchase convertible notes and warrants (refer to the Alpha Chi Option above) as derivative liabilities that decision, no beneficial conversion feature was reflectedare measured at their far value at each period end, in accordance with ASC 815 (“Derivatives and Hedging”).

The Company uses directly observable inputs as well as significant unobservable inputs in the financial statements.valuation of these derivative liabilities (level 3 measurements). The inputs used in the valuation are risk free interest rate, expected volatility, expect option term, expected dividend yield and Company specific discount rate.

The fair value of the derivative liabilities at December 31, 2017, as well prior to and following the effective date of the aforementioned settlement, was immaterial. The fair value of the derivative liabilities as of December 31, 2016 was $336,272. Finance expense from revaluation of the derivative liabilities included in the Company’s statement of operations was $336,272 for the year ended December 31 2016 and finance income was $336,272 for the year ended December 31, 2017.

Non-convertible note

On July 8, 2014, the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Axel Springer Plug & Play Accelerator GmbH (the "Holder"), in the amount of $29,719. Accrued interest as of December 31, 2017 amounted to $3,316. In terms of the original agreement, as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the convertible note is no longer convertible.

Note 6. Stockholders’ Equity.

Shares of common stock confer upon their holders the right to receive notice to participate and vote in general meetings of shareholders of the Company, the right to receive dividends, if declared, and the right to receive a distribution of any surplus of assets upon liquidation of the Company.

Preferred shares confer upon their holders the right to receive dividends when paid to holders of common stock of the Company on an as-converted basis, and the right to receive a distribution of any surplus of assets upon liquidation of the Company before any distribution or payment shall be made to the holders of any common stock.

The following table summarizes information of outstanding warrants issued to investors and consultants in exchange for their services as of December 31, 2017:

  Warrants  Warrant Term  Exercise Price  Exercisable 
Investors - Class A Warrants  6,334,626   1 year  $0.14-0.80   6,334,626 
Investors - Class B Warrants  5,400,478   5 years  $0.14   5,400,478 
Alimi Ahmed - Class E Warrants (1)  900,000    (1) $0.0001   900,000 

(1) During 20142015, a total of 2,700,000 Class E Warrants were issued by the Company to Lior Wayn pursuant to the terms of the Share Exchange Agreement and 2015 we recorded $9,555were exercisable in three equal tranches of 900,000 Shares each (the “Tranches”) at an exercise price of $0.0001 per Share, subject to and $0,within 45 days of the Company achieving the milestones defined in the Share Exchange Agreement. On December 16, 2016, the Company terminated Lior Way’s employment agreements with the Company and Emerald Israel, and his removal as an executive officer and director. During 2017, Mr. Wayn transferred, sold and assigned his 5,212,878 shares of the Company’s common stock and 900,000 Class E Warrants that were fully-vested to an entity controlled by Mr. Alimi Ahmed, then a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. Effective as of December 31, 2016, the remaining 1,800,000 Class E Warrants that had been issued to Mr. Wayn were canceled.

Issuances of Common Stock and Warrants during 2016 and 2017

Certain warrants were issued together with convertible notes, as detailed in Note 6.

On January 26, 2016 and March 17, 2016, the Company issued 125,000 common shares to one service provider and 50,000 common shares to two service providers, respectively, for services valued at a total value of $251,250, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $1.75 and $0.65, respectively.

On February 18, 2016, the Company issued 1,195,000 shares to three acting directors, for services valued at a total value of $1,194,403, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $1.00.

On January 26, 2016, consultants that were previously issued 2,500,000 Class B Warrants exercisable for a two-year period to acquire one (1) share of Common Stock at a price of $0.40 per share, exercised the warrants on a cashless basis resulting in amortization1,928,572 shares issued with no additional related expense booked.

On May 5, 2016, the Company issued 150,000 shares to one service provider for services valued at a total value of debt discount.$105,000, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.7.

On May 10, 2016, the Company issued 41,667 shares to one service provider for services valued at a total value of $29,584, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.71.

On May 18, 2016, the Company issued 150,000 shares to one service provider for services valued at a total value of $102,000, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.68.

On June 28, 2016, the Company issued 175,000 shares to three service providers for services valued at a total value of $122,500, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.7.

On June 30, 2016, the Company issued 333,333 shares to one service provider for services valued at a total value of $226,666, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.68.

On July 1, 2016, the Company issued 300,000 shares to one service provider for service valued at a total value of $213,000 arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.71.

On July 1, 2016, the Company issued 6,767 shares to one service provider for service valued at a total value of $3,587 arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.53.

On August 4, 2016, the Company issued 31,250 shares to one service provider for service valued at a total value of $15,313, arrived at using the stock price on date of grant of $0.49.

The total value of the services provided in respect of the above-mentioned share issuances between May 2016 and June 2016 were charged to general and administrative expenses in the Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

On November 10, 2016, the Company issued 119,000 units to Guy Shalom in total amount of $47,600. Each unit consist 119,000 Class A Warrants exercisable for a two-year period in exercise price of $0.80 and 119,000 common shares.

On February 24, 2017, Publicis Groupe 90 (“Publicis 90”) invested 500,000 Euros or approximately U$526,000 and the Registrant accepted a Reg S Subscription Agreement from Publicis 90 in consideration for the issuance to Publicis 90 of 1,315,563 restricted shares of the Registrant’s common stock at a subscription price of $0.40 per share. The issuance was made in reliance upon the exemptions provided in Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”) and Regulation S promulgated by the SEC under the Act.

On April 25, 2017, a holder of a convertible note in the principal amount of $100,000 issued in July 2016, converted $10,400 into 74,572, shares based on an adjusted conversion price of $0.14. The conversion price was adjusted on March 22, 2017 pursuant to the provisions of the 2016 Secured Convertible Note Agreement.

On June 12, 2017, certain warrant holders holding 1,100,000 Class A Warrants and 1,100,000 Class B Warrants, elected to exercise certain warrants on a cashless basis. In accordance with the 2016 Secured Convertible Note Agreement the Class A warrants and Class B warrants were increased to 5,665,626 each, based on an adjusted share price of $0.14 per share and 3,451,490 Class B Warrants were converted to 1,096,395 shares at $0.14 per share. The exercise price and amount of shares issued were adjusted on March 22, 2017.

On June 12, 2017, the Company completed the issuance of 125,000 shares of the Company’s common stock to Alpha pursuant to the Company’s agreement with Alpha in the prior year.

In July and August 2017, the Company received $80,000 in respect of 571,429 units to two accredited investors for $0.14 per unit. Each unit consist (i) 571,429 shares at a price of $0.14 per share, (ii) 571,429 Class H warrants exercisable for a one-year period in exercise price of $0.14, and (iii) 571,429 Class I warrants exercisable for a two-year period. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had not issued the shares or the warrants to the accredited investors as such, the proceeds were recorded as Receipts on Account of shares in the Company’s shareholders equity statement.

During 2017, Class A warrants issued during 2015 andwhich were exercisable to acquire 4,149,719 shares, expired. During 2016, the Class C warrants issued during 2014, weexpired.

Recent Option Grants

During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, the Company had accrued interest of $2,013 and $19,285, respectively.outstanding awards for stock options under its 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Plan”).

The Convertible Note is convertible atPlan, which was approved by the lessorBoard of Directors on December 1, 2017 and provides for the grant of up to 2 million shares to eligible participants bearing such terms and conditions, including but not limited to vesting provisions, exercise price(s) and other terms as the Board of Directors may reasonably determine from time to time, expires on November 30, 2023. Options granted under the Plan may be exercised on a market based discountedcash or cashless basis, and a fixed rate derived from a fixed market cap. The Holders have the right followingnumber of shares eligible for grant under the DatePlan may be increased, and the option exercise price(s) and vesting terms may the adjusted by, the Board of Issuance, and until any time until the convertible Promissory Note is fully paid,Directors, subject to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portionprovisions of the Convertible Promissory Note,Plan and accrued interest, into fully paidapplicable laws and non-assessable sharesrules. Any options under the Plans that are canceled or forfeited before expiration become available for future grants. The Board of Common Stock. Holder was not issued warrants withDirectors of the Convertible Promissory Note. See Note 7 for description of derivative testing.Company administers the Company’s stock incentive compensation and equity-based plans.

Note Payable - Not Convertible

On February 11, 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 70,533 options to certain of its employees. Each option is exercisable to purchase a share of common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.01-$0.4 per share. As of December 15, 2014, we issued31,2016, 47,133 options were fully-vested, and 31,500 options were canceled. As a promissory noteresult, the Company recognized share-based payment expenses in 2016 in the amount of $22,375$21,798.

On February 18, 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 1,466,700 options to certain of its employees and consultants. Each option is exercisable to purchase a related party in consideration for payments made on behalfshare of common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.01- $0.4 per share. As of December 31,2016, all the options were fully vested. As a result, the Company for service provided to the Company (the "December 2014 Note"). The December 2014 Note bears interest at the rate of 1% per annum, is due and payable on May 12, 2015. On April 21, 2015 this promissory note with interest due was repaidrecognized share-based payment expenses in full.

On January 14 and 16, 2015, we issued two promissory notes2016 in the amount of $15,000 each$1,389,614.

On May 5, 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 93,750 options to two different unrelated parties in consideration for cash transferredcertain of consultants. Each option is exercisable to purchase a share of common stock at an exercise price equal to $0.001 per share. As of December 31, 2016, all the options were fully vested. As a result, the Company (the "January 2015 Notes"). The Notes were issued to unrelated parties and due to the low interest rate an imputed interest expense was calculated. The January 2015 Notes bears interest at the rate of 1% per annum, are due and payable on January 14 and 16,recognized share-based payment expenses in 2016 and are not convertible to common stock.

One of the notes was repaid in full on March 3, 2015 with interest due waived the by the debtor, and the second note was repaid on April 22, 2015 with interest due waived the by the debtor.

During the second quarter an agreement was reached with the holder of a $120,979 advance payable note to settle the full amount due for $30,000, and interest due. The settlement with all note holders resulted in $528 loss on debt settlement due to the payment being higher than principal and accrued interest as of the settlement date as well as a charge of $90,979, that was considered a contribution of capital due to the fact that note holder, IMWT, was a related party.

We concluded that these notes have a stated rate of interest that is different from the rate of interest that is appropriate for this type of debt at the date of the transaction. Accordingly, the company imputed interest at an appropriate rate estimated at 8% as prescribed under FASB ASC 835. The resultant charge of $6,280 for the period ending December 31, 2014 and $4,113 for the period ending December 31, 2015 to interest expense was considered a contribution of capital and was recorded in additional paid in capital.

On November 16, 2014 four individuals loaned a total amount of $87,910 to the Company with maturity dates of November 16, 2015 and bearing an interest rate of 8% per annum. These notes were fully converted on July 16, 2015 to Company shares of commons stock and warrants as described in Note 3 resulting in a $678,027 loss on settlement of debt.

Between March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2015 the Chief Scientist Ministry of Israel loaned the company an amount of $119,974. The loan bears 17% interest and shall be due and payable when the company generates sales revenue from products in development.

For the periods ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 the Company has recognized $19,285 and $2,013, respectively, in accrued interest expense related to the stated interest rate on the notes. Interest expense for the periods ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, were $30,604 and $5,605 of which $9,555 and $0 is from the amortization of debt discount.

Note 7. Derivative Liabilities from Convertible Note.

On July 8, 2014 the Company issued a convertible promissory note to Axel Springer Plug & Play Accelerator GmbH (the "Holder"), in the amount of $29,719.$61,455.

The Convertible noteOn October 1, 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 2,514,500 options to certain of its executive, director and consultants. Each option is convertibleexercisable to purchase a share of common stock at the lessor of a market based discounted and a fixed rate derived from a fixed market cap. The Holder has the right following the Date of Issuance, and until any time until the convertible Promissory Note is fully paid,an exercise price equal to convert any outstanding and unpaid principal portion of the Convertible Promissory Note, and accrued interest, into fully paid and non-assessable shares of Common Stock. The Holder was not issued warrants with the Convertible Promissory Note.

$0.001- $0.40 per share. As of December 31, 2015 the note is no longer convertible since pursuant to the loan agreement prior to December 31,2015 (the "Maturity Date"),2016, 1,111,500 options were fully vested and $450,000 thousands were canceled. As a result, the Company consummated a financing round led by unaffiliated investorsrecognized share-based payment expenses in 2016 in the amount of $396,222.

On November 3, 2016, the Company’s board of directors approved a grant of 339,000 options to certain of its employees. Each option is exercisable to purchase a share of common stock at least 200,000 Euro, at a Company pre-money valuation on a fully diluted basis of at least 750,000 Euro (a "Qualified Round"), the Holder shall be entitled (but not obligated) to convert the entire loan amount into the most senior class of shares of the Company issued in such Qualified Round, based on aan exercise price per share equal to the lower of the price$0.2-$0.4 per share reflected by a Company pre-money valuation on a fully diluted basis calculated at the time of conversion equal to 1,500,000 Euro; or - price per share which reflects a 20% discount on the lowest price per share issued pursuant to such Qualified Round and upon the occurrence of such event, the note holder elected not to convert upon receiving notice of such event and the loan became non-convertible.

The following shows the changes in the derivative liability measured on a recurring basis for the twelve months ended December 31, 2015, and year ended December 31, 2014.

 Level 3
Derivative Liability at December 31, 2013$-
Additions to Derivative Liability related to Convertible Debt 20,532
Derivative Liability at December 31, 2014$20,532
Extinguishment of Derivative Liability (20,532)
Derivative Liability at December 31, 2015$-

share. As of December 31, 2014,31,2016, 139,000 options were fully vested. As a result, the Company has a $20,532 derivative liability and a $20,164 convertible note payable, net of discount of $9,555. As of December 31, 2015, the Company has $0 derivative liability and $29,719 convertible note payable, net of discount of $0.

In accordance to ASC #815, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, we evaluated the holder's non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause, containedrecognized share-based payment expenses in 2016 in the terms governing the Note to determine whether the features qualify as an embedded derivative instruments at issuance. Such non-detachable conversion right provision and liquidated damages clause did not need to be accounted for as derivative financial instruments. Additionally, since the conversion priceamount of $40,747.

A summary of the notes representedCompany’s activity related to options to employees, executives, directors and consultants and related information is as follows:

  

For the year ended

December 31, 2017

  

For the year ended

December 31, 2016

 
  Amount of options  Weighted average exercise price  Aggregate intrinsic value  Amount of options  Weighted average exercise price  Aggregate intrinsic value 
     $  $     $  $ 
Outstanding at beginning of year  4,193,397   0.11       561,280   0.0666     
Granted              5,440,483   0.1336     
Exercised  -   -       (697,086)  -     
Cancelled  (4,130,397)  (0.11)      (550,000)  (0.3956)    
                         
Outstanding at the end of year  62,500   0.01      4,193,397   0.11   1,006,415 
Vested and expected-to-vest at end of period  62,500   0.01   -   3,288,062   0.11   789,134 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value (the difference between the fair market value of the Company'sCompany’s common stock at the time of issuance, no beneficial conversion feature exists. No beneficial conversion feature was reflected in the financial statements because at the time of the agreement the FMV of the shares if converted, were less than the original note amounton December 31, 2017 and December 31, 2016 respectively and the $20,532 extinguishmentexercise price, multiplied by the number of derivative was reflected inin-the-money stock options on those dates) that would have been received by the equity and cash flow statementsstock option holders had all stock option holders exercised their stock options on those dates.

The stock options outstanding as a non-cash transfer from liabilities to equity.

Note 8. Other Receivables.

As of December 31, 20152017, and December 31, 20142016, have been separated into exercise prices, as follows:

Exercise price Stock options outstanding as of December 31,  Weighted average remaining contractual life – years as of December 31,  Stock options exercisable as of December 31, 
  2017  2016  2017  2016  2017  2016 
                   
0.4  -   1,208,600   -   9.25   -   1,208,600 
                         
0.2  -   1,870,000   -   9   -   1,870,000 
(*)  62,500   1,114,797   8.25   9.25   62,500   1,114,797 
   62,500   4,193,397   8.25   9.25   4,193,397   4,193,397 

(*) 0.01 or less

Compensation expense recorded by the Company had other receivablesin respect of $25,797its stock-based employee compensation awards in accordance with ASC 718-10 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and $6,718,2016 was $76,616 and $2,028,805, respectively which represent VAT refunds claimed resulting from excess VAT paid over VAT received fromand are included in General and Administrative expenses in the Israeli government.Statements of Operations

The fair value of the stock options is estimated at the date of grant using Black-Scholes options pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

  Years ended December 31, 
  2017  2016 
       
Expected volatility  (*)  157%
Risk-free interest  (*)  0.69%
Dividend yield  (*)  0%
Expected life of up to (years)  (*)  6.0 

(*) There were no options granted during the year ended December 31, 2017.

Note 9. Accounts Payable7. Related Party Transactions.

Other than transactions and Accrued Liabilities.balances related to cash and share based compensation to officers and directors and other than the issues of convertible debt and warrants to Alpha, the Company did not have any transactions and balances with related parties and executive officers during 2017 and 2016 other than an amount of $82,331 and $125,896 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively owed to the Company’s chairman in respect of Company expenditures paid by him on behalf of the Company.

Note 8. Commitments and Contingencies

The Company received grants to fund research and development projects from the State of Israel according to guidelines and procedures of the Office of the Chief Scientist of the Ministry of Industry and Trade. According to the agreement, the Company is obligated to pay royalties on the sale of products developed with the participation of the Chief Scientist. The royalty rate is 3.5% of sales and the total royalties will not exceed the amount of the grants received. As of December 31, 2016, total grants received amounted approximately $222 thousands.

The obligation to pay royalties is contingent upon the successful outcome of the Company’s research and development projects and the attainment of sales. The Company has no obligation to pay royalties, if sales are not generated, and if the research and development project fails.

In April 2017, a lawsuit was filed with the Tel Aviv court by Emerald’s former CEO and founder, claiming certain damages to the total amount of $100,000, under the assertion of wrongful dismissal by the Company. The Company believes these claims to be unsubstantiated and wholly without merit and intends to defend itself against these claims. The Company believes that there is a less than 50% chance of his claim being successful. Accordingly, no provision was recorded in regards to this claim.

In December 2017, a liquidation request was filed with the Tel Aviv court by a group of former Company’s employees under the assertion of delay of pay and insolvency. On December 20, 2017, a hearing discussion took place according to which the court decision that the Company shall settle its pension debts to the former employees within 21 days and settle its severance debts to them in 60 days, otherwise a winding-up order could be given. The amounts being claimed by the former employees are less than $96,000 and are included in current liabilities. The Company is seeking to identify potential acquired of Emerald Israel, but as of the date of this report has been unsuccessful and therefore the Company believes that the Court will place Emerald Israel in liquidation.

Note 9 Income Taxes.

The Company is subject to income taxes under the Israeli and U.S. tax laws:

Corporate tax rates

The Company is subject to Israeli corporate tax rate of 25% in 2016, 24% in 2017 and 23% from 2018. The maximum statutory federal tax rate in the US in 2017 and 2016 is 35%. The Company is not subject to current federal taxes, as it has incurred losses in 2016 and 2017.

As of December 31, 2015 and December 31, 20142017, the Company had accounts payablegenerated net operating losses in Israel of approximately $3,193,927, which may be carried forward and accrued liabilities of $90,705 and $2,577, respectively, which mainly represent accrued expenses such as accrued vacation and deferred salary.offset against taxable income in the future for an indefinite period.

Note 10. Litigation Accruals.

On November 9, 2015, the Company received a notice of claim from Tomer Maharshak & Co., Israel, the Company's former attorneys, for legal fees allegedly owed by the Company and its wholly owned Israeli subsidiary, Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. On December 12, 2015 and December 23, 2015 the litigation was settled for cash payment and the Company recorded neither a gain nor a loss on the settlement. As of December 31, 20152017, the litigation accrual balance is zero and there are currently no ongoing litigations against the Company.

Note 11. Income Taxes.

We have adopted ASC 740 which provides for the recognition of a deferred tax asset based upon the value the carry-forwards will have to reduce future income taxes and management's estimate of the probability of the realization of these tax benefits. OurCompany generated net operating loss carryovers incurred prior to 2014 consideredlosses in the U.S. of approximately $15,150,925. Net operating losses in the United States are available to reduce future income taxes were reduced or eliminated through our recent change2035. Utilization of control (I.R.C. Section 382(a)) and the continuity of business limitation of I.R.C. Section 382(c).

We have a currentU.S. net operating loss carry-forward of $1,941,140 resulting in deferred tax assets of $679,399. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all our net deferred tax asset.

Future utilization of currently generated federal and state NOL and tax credit carry forwardslosses may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to the ownership change limitations provided by“change in ownership” provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended and similar state provisions. The annual limitation may result in the expiration of NOL and tax credit carry forwardsnet operating losses before full utilization.

December 31, 2015December 31, 2014
Individual components giving rise to the deferred tax assets are as follows:$$
Future tax benefit arising from net operating loss carryovers679,39935,510
Less valuation allowance(679,399)(35,510)
Net deferred asset$

-

$

-

The Company is still in its development stage and has not under examinationyet generated revenues, therefore, it is more likely than not that sufficient taxable income will not be available for the tax losses to be utilized in the future. Therefore, a valuation allowance was recorded to reduce the deferred tax assets to its recoverable amounts.

  As of
December 31, 2017
  As of
December 31, 2016
 
Net loss carry-forward $18,344,852  $17,155,076 
         
Total deferred tax assets  3,916,297   5,730,945 
Valuation allowance  (3,916,297)  (5,730,945)
         
Net deferred tax assets $-  $- 

On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) was signed into law in the United States. The Tax Act, among other provisions, introduces changes in the U.S corporate tax rate, business related deductions and credits, and has international tax consequences for companies that operate globally. Most of the changes introduced in the Tax Act are effective beginning on January 1, 2018. As a result of the tax act the maximum statutory federal tax rate was reduced to 21% starting on January 1, 2018. The other effects of the Tax Act provisions are still being identified and evaluated by any jurisdictionthe Company.

Note 10 -Restatement

Options to Purchase Convertible Notes and Warrants

As described in Note 5, during July 2016 the Company issued Alpha and Chi Squared, an option to (the “Option”) to purchase an aggregate of up to $385,000 (up to $350,000 for any tax year. Our federalAlpha and state income tax returns are openup to $35,000 for fiscal years ending on or afterChi Squared) of Notes (“Option Notes”) and Warrants (“Option Warrants”) substantially identical to the Notes and Warrants issued pursuant to Alpha and Chi in June 2016. As part of the Settlement Agreement concluded in August 2017 (see note 5), The Option was extended through to July 15, 2018. As of the date of the Settlement Agreement, and as of December 31, 2011.2017, the fair value of the Option is nil.

The Option, as described above does not meet the scope exception of ASC 815 (“Derivatives and Hedging”) and as such, the Option should have been measured at its fair value at the effective date of the grant date and at each subsequent reporting date.

The Company erroneously did not record the fair value of the Option at the issuance date and at December 31, 2016.

The fair value of the Option at issuance date and as of December 31, 2016 was $1,049,953 and $336,272, respectively.

The following tables present the restated financial statements line items:

Emerald Medical Applications Corp.

Balance Sheet

  As of December 31, 2016 
  As Reported  Adjustments  As Restated 
          
Liabilities            
Derivative liability  -   336,272   336,272 
Accumulated deficit  14,670,241   336,272   15,046, 513 
Total shareholders’ deficit  (900,627)  336,272   (1,236,899)

Emerald Medical Applications Corp.

Statement of Operations

  For the year ended December 31, 2016 
  As Reported  Adjustments  As Restated 
          
Total finance income (expense)  (414,190)  (336,272)  (750,462)
Net Loss  (5,808,925)  (336,272)  (6,145,197)

37

Down Round Feature Included in Convertible Notes and Warrants

As described in Note 5, the Company’s convertible notes and warrants issued in 2016 to Alpha and Chi Squared and Firstfire contain a down round adjustment feature which, according to US Gaap, requires such derivatives to be classified in liabilities and to be measured at their fair value at each cut of date. Such derivative liabilities, with a fair value of $567 thousand as of December 31, 2016 were erroneously not included in the Company’s December 31 2016 balance sheet.

The Company early adopted ASU 2017-11, Part I (“Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features”), issued in July 2017, which makes certain changes in relation to classifying certain financial instruments as either liabilities or equity such that the aforementioned derivatives are no longer precluded from being recorded in equity. The Company adopted the standard retrospectively for all prior periods presented in these interim financial statements such that December 31 2016 comparison information included in these financial statements is identical to the December 31 2016 financial information included in the Company’s original 2016 annual 10-K filing.

Note 12.11. Subsequent Events.

During Q1 2016 throughout

Cessation of Operations

On January 29, 2018, the Company determined to cease it DermaCompare operations and a trustee is currently in the process of liquidating Emerald Israelto satisfy its debts.

New Business Developments

On January 17, 2018, the Company formed a new wholly owned subsidiary, Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd. (the Subsidiary”), to develop and market software and hardware products facilitating, allowing and supporting purchase and/or sale of cryptocurrencies through ATMs, tablets, PCs and/or mobile devices.

On January 23, 2018, the Subsidiary entered into a binding term sheet with Chiron Refineries Ltd. (“Chiron”), a public company listed on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE: CHR). Pursuant to the Term Sheet, they shall act as a distributer in the territory of the Republic of Turkey, including the territory of Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus (the “Territory”); and (ii) the shall have the right to appoint sub-distributors within the Territory.

The appointment of the Distributor is subject to the payment by the Distributor to our Subsidiary of US$250,000 (the “Appointment Fee”). An amount of $150,000 of the total Appointment Fee shall be deemed an advance payment by the Distributor, made on account of future purchases of our Products and related services.

The Company further granted the Distributor an option, exercisable by the Distributor within 12 months from the date on which the ATM Product, including the related software and hardware, is fully tested and ready for installation and operation, to be appointed as an exclusive distributor of the filingProducts for the Federal Republic of Form 10-K.Nigeria. If the following subsequent events occurred:option is exercised, the Distributor shall pay the Subsidiary an appointment fee not higher than $250,000.

Issuance of convertible notes in 2018.

From January 16 through January 23, 2018, the Company received the aggregate amount of $100,000 from “accredited investors” in consideration for the issuance of convertible promissory notes (the “Notes”) bearing: (i) interest at the rate of 1% per annum; and (ii) a conversion price of $0.01 per share.

On December 19, 2017, the Company approved, subject to a future sale by the “Sellers,” (as defined below) to sell their convertible loans, loans, and warrant to certain third-party investors and in connection therewith, to: (i) amend the exercise price of warrants granted to Alpha, Chi Squared Capital, Firstfire, Goldmed Ltd, Ilan Malca and Maz Partners (the “Sellers”) to $0.01, (ii) to amend the conversation price of convertible notes granted to Sellers to $0.01 and (iii) to amend the interest rate to 1% per annum.

On January 24, the Sellers sold their loans totaling $956,209 to the new third-party investors, and $73,000 of such loans were converted at $0.01 per shares into 7,300,000 ordinary shares of the Company. Also, on March 19, 2018, a further $9,218 into 921,800 shares, based upon the note conversion price of $0.01 per share.

On January 26, 20162018 the company signed a consulting agreement with Maz Partners, pursuant to which they are to provide investment and after receiving conversion noticescorporate finance advise in consideration for 200,000 Class H warrants. Each Class H warrant is execrable into one share at $0.14 per share and the warrants expire each exercisable into one shares. The period of the agreement is two years the effective date.

Equity raise from Class B warrant holders, the Company's boardsale of directors approved issuanceunits in 2018.

From January 31 through February 13, 2018, the Company received the aggregate amount of 1,928,572 shares$1,375,700 from “accredited investors” in consideration for the cashless conversion of Class B warrants. On February 18, 2016, the Company's board of directors approved the issuance of 1,195,00019,647,856 units (the “Units”) at an offering price of $0.07 per Unit, each Unit consisting of: (i) one (1) share of common stock (the “Shares”); and (ii) one (1) common stock purchase warrant exercisable for a period of twenty-four (24) months to purchase one (1) additional Share at an exercise price of $0.14. (the “$0.07 Unit Offering”). The offer and sale of the Units, without registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), was made in reliance upon the exemption provided Regulation S and Regulation D promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Act.

An additional 13 “accredited investors” under the $0.07 Unit Offering, who subscribed during the period set forth above, submitted their subscription proceeds after February 16, 2018 and, as a result, the Registrant issued an additional 3,928,571 restricted shares through March 13, 2018 and, in connection therewith, the Registrant received additional subscription proceeds of $277,100.

On February 8, 2018 the Company issued 571,429 shares to two accredited investors in respect of $80,000 which was received in 2017 – see note (6).

On March 12, 2018, the Company issued a total of 2,600,000 restricted shares to certain consultants in connection with services rendered during the first quarter of 2018 which shares were valued at $676,000, based on the closing share price on the day prior to the issuance.

On March 20, 2018, the Company issued a total of 1,092,500 restricted shares as compensationfollows: (i) 62,500 restricted shares were issued to three acting company directors: Mrs. Estery Giloz-Ran, Mr.Guy Shalom, a resident of Israel, in consideration for the exercise of a stock option at an exercise price of $0.01 per share, which options were granted in connection with a services rendered in October 2016; (ii) 300,000 restricted shares were issued to Yair Fudim, a resident of Israel, pursuant to a Services Agreement for serving as the Registrant’s CEO, which shares were valued at $0.01 per share; and Mr. Baruch Kfir. On February 17, 2016 and March 17, 2016,(iii) 730,000 restricted shares were issued to Lyons Capital LLC, an accredited investor organized under the Company boardlaws of directors approved the issuanceState of 175,000Florida, in connection with services under a six-month engagement letter/services agreement (“Engagement Letter”), which shares for serviceswere valued at $124,100, based on the closing share price on the day prior to two investor relations service providers.


the Engagement Letter.

39

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSUREBack to Table of Contents

None.

ITEM 9A.9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURESBack to Table of Contents

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of December 31, 2015,2017, the Company'sCompany’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company'sCompany’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective as of the end of the fiscal year 20152017 under the COSO framework.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for the assessment of the effectiveness of those internal controls. As defined by the SEC, internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, who is also the sole member of our Board of Directors, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of the financial statements in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Management has assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2015.2017. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on our assessment and those criteria, we have concluded that our internal control over financial reporting had material weaknesses including lack of sufficient internal accounting personnel in order to ensure complete documentation of complex transactions and adequate financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2015.2017. Management has identified corrective actions for the weakness and will begin implementation during the second quarter of 2016.2018.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the company'sCompany’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management'sManagement’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company'sCompany’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only Management'sManagement’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting or in other factors identified in connection with the evaluation required by paragraph (d) of Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 or 15d-15 that occurred during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 20152017 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATIONBack to Table of Contents

None.


PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE REGISTRANT AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCEBack to Table of Contents

Our directors were elected to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until his respective successors will have been elected and will have qualified. The following table sets forth the name, age and position held with respect to our present executive officers and directors:

 

Name Age Title
Lior Wayn43CEO and director
Oded Gilboa42CFO
Yair Fudim66Chairman
Baruch Kfir 67 CEO and Chairman
Gadi Levin44CFO
Eyal Ben-Ami41Director
Dr. Estery Giloz-RanAlon Dayan 41 Director

Lior Wayn, 43, the CEO and a director since August 28, 2015. Mr. Wayn founded Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. ("Emerald) on February 17, 2010, based upon his years of experience in the information and communications technologies (ICT) industry and his know how in mobilizing teams for large and complex projects. Before forming Emerald, Mr. Wayn served from 2006 through 2010 as head of the Business Development Division (VP) at Malam Team, a public company traded on the Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange, and the largest IT services group in Israel, providing a comprehensive range of computer services in the field of information technology. Mr. Wayn previously worked in sales and business development for several of Israel's leading ICT organizations including Ness Technologies, EIM and Michshuv group. Mr. Wayn received Lior received a BA degree in business administration from the Ruppin Academic Center, a leading Israeli university. He furthered his education in Human Resource Management at Bar-Iian University, in IT Management at College of Management, Rishon Lezion and in Hotel and Hospitality Management at Tadmor College, all in Israel.

Oded Gilboa, 42, a licensed CPA in the United States and Israel, has been the CFO since February 2015. Since December 2013, Mr. Gilboa has also been serving as CFO of BreedIt Corp., a reporting company under the Exchange Act. Mr. Gilboa has over 18 years of experience in finance and public accounting, having served as a senior finance executive in the technology and biotech industries with responsibilities in corporate finance, accounting, strategic planning and operational and financial management. From 2010 through 2012, Mr. Gilboa served as the Revenue Accounting and Finance Manager of Mylan Specialty, a subsidiary of Mylan Inc. (NASDAQ: MYL), a company focused on the development, manufacturing and marketing of prescription drug products. From 2007 through 2009, Mr. Gilboa was the Executive Director of Finance and US Controller of Taro Pharmaceuticals (NASDAQ:TAROF), a global pharmaceutical company. From 1998 through 2007 Mr. Gilboa held various financial positions with IDT Corporation (NYSE:IDT), a world-wide provider of telecommunications and media services, where in his most recent role he served as Director of Finance. Mr. Gilboa began his career in public accounting, auditing both public and private companies and holds a B.A in Economics and Accounting and an M.B.A. from the Tel-Aviv University.

Yair Fudim, age 66, Director., On February 15, 2018, the Registrant’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Yair Fudim, as Chairman of the Board of Directors and Chief Executive Officer of the Registrant. Mr.Fudim previously served as Chairman of the Registrant’s Board of Directors effectivefrom April 30, 2015 hasuntil December 25, 2016. Mr. Fudim was also been serving as Chairman and CEO of Peregrine Industries, Inc., a public company (OTCQB: PGID) sincefrom July 2013.2013 to August 2017. During the past five years, Mr. Fudim has also served as Chairman of Dolomite Holdings Ltd., a public company organized in Israel and listed on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange ("TASE"(“TASE”) since February 2013, prior to which he served as Dolomite'sDolomite’s CEO from February 2010 until March 2013. From April 1991 through April 2013, Mr. Fudim served as CEO of Leader Holdings & Investments Ltd ("(“Leader Holdings"Holdings”), a public company organized in Israel and listed on the TASE; Mr. Fudim also serves as Chairman of the Board of Leader Capital Markets Ltd., a TASE listed public company organized in Israel and a subsidiary of Leader Holdings. Mr. Fudim holds a B.A. in Economics and an MBA from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

 

40

Baruch Kfir, 67,

Mr. Gadi Levin, age 44, Chief Financial Officer. On April 18, 2017, the Board of Directors appointed Mr. Levin to serve a director since September 6, 2015.CFO of the Registrant. Mr. Levin has over 15 years of experience working with public US, Canadian and multi-jurisdictional public companies. Mr. Levin currently serves as Chief Financial Officer of Briacell Therapeutics Corp (OTCQB: BCTXF, TSX-V: BRIA.V) and Adira Energy Limited (OTCMKTS: ADENF, TSX.V: ADL.V). Previously, Mr. Levin served as Chief Financial Officer of DarioHeath Corp (NASDAQ: DRIO), a mHealth company operating in the field diabetes management. Mr. Levin also served as the Vice President of Finance and Chief Financial Officer for two Israeli investment firms specializing in private equity, hedge funds and real estate. Mr. Levin began his CPA career at the accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, where he worked for nine years, specializing in U.S. listed companies involved in IPO's working with US GAAP and IFRS. Mr. Levin has a Bachelor of Commerce degree in Accounting and Information Systems from the University of the Cape Town, South Africa, and a post graduate diploma in Accounting from the University of South Africa. He received his Chartered Accountant designation in South Africa and has an MBA from Bar Ilan University in Israel.

Eyal Ben-Ami, age 41, Director. On January 19, 2018, the Registrant’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Eyal Ben-Ami as a member of the Board. From March 20102008 to the present, Mr. Baruch KfirBen-Ami has served as Senior Wealth Managerthe Director of Employee Benefits at the IDB Bank of Israel, founded in 1935 and one of Israel’s three largest banks. IDB Bank hasmore than 260 branches, a staff of approximately 5,700, assets of approximately US$50 billion and international operations with branches in Israel and the United States. From 1993 through 2007, Mr. Ben-Ami was a professional soccer player and a member of Hapoel Tel-Aviv FC, a professional Israeli soccer team, and a member of Israel’s National Soccer Team.

Alon Dayan, age 41, Director:On March 14, 2018, the Registrant appointed Mr. Alon Dayan as a member of the Registrant’s Board of Directors. On January 24, 2018, Mr. Dayan was appointed as CEO of the Registrant’s wholly-owned Israeli subsidiary, Virtual Crypto Technologies Ltd. with responsibilities for Pioneer Internationalthe development, production, manufacture and sale of the Subsidiary’s planned ATM for the purchase and sale of crypto currencies. Mr. Dayan’s background includes business and technical experience and success in new technologies.

From July 2014 to the present, Mr. Dayan has served as the CEO and founder of L1 Systems Ltd(www.L1-systems.com), an Israeli based company engaged in the business of providing the public and private sectors with advanced security solutions including: (i) development, production and sale of a wealth management firm basednew technology for secured wide band cellular communication; (ii)telecommunications and cyber large-scale system integration; (iii)identifying potential business partners and system integration companies for companies in Israel.Israel, Latin America, Eastern Europe, and Spain. Since July 2013, Mr. Kfir's duties have included both developing and maintaining financial planning for high-net-worth clients in Mexico and Venezuela and previouslyDayan has served as CEO of Pioneer, Venezuela. From October 2005 until February 2010, Mr. Kfirand was the headfounder of Polaris Star (www.polaris-sys.com), an Israeli-based company which is engaged in providing advanced cyber security telecommunication for utilities world-wide, including the Latin-American Desk of theUnited States, Israel, Discount Bank, Switzerland (IDB), responsible for developing new clients in Argentina, Brazil, VenezuelaIndia, Japan, Singapore, Italy, Mexico and Mexico for IDB. Mr. Kfir has over 30 years of experience in international banking and finance, specialized in the Latin and South American markets, received his B.A. from Haifa University, Israel.Brazil.

Dr. Estery Giloz-Ran, 41, a director since September 6, 2015, is a Certified Public Accountant, received a PhD in tax, accounting and finance from the Business Administration Department at the Ben-Gurion University in Beer Sheva, Israel in 2013. During the past five years, Dr. Giloz-Ran hasFrom 2006 to July 2013, Mr. Dayan served as Head of Accountancy at Peres Academic Center,Regional Director-Sales and Business Development, for Elbit Systems Ltd (NASDAQ: ESLT), an Israeli-based companyand a leading Israeli college locatedmanufacturer of electronic defense materials with approximately 5,000 employees.

In 2003, Mr. Dayan received hisB.Tech. degree in Rehovot, Israel. Dr. Giloz-Ran presently serves as a director of: (i) Kamada Ltd, an Israeli biotech company listed on NASDAQ and Tel-Aviv Stock Exchange/TASE; (ii) Vaxil Bio Ltd, an Isreali biotech company listed on TASE, and (iii) Suny Electronic Inc. Ltd, an Israeli electronics company listed on TASE. Since 2006, Dr. Giloz-Ran has been lecturing at Ben-Gurionelectronic engineering from Ariel University at the FacultyIsrael, which is part of Business and Management - Department of Economics and Accounting. Dr. Giloz-Ran was a Visiting Assistant Professor of Finance at the Syms School of Business at Yeshiva University, New York and a Visiting Scholar at New York University - Leonard N. Stern School of Business, New York. Dr. Giloz-Ran served as a tax consultant and tax capital investment law adviser at Intel Corporation in Israel.Bar-Ilan University.

We do not compensate our directors. We do not have any standing committees at this time.

 

Our director, officers or affiliates have not, within the past five years, filed any bankruptcy petition, been convicted in or been the subject of any pending criminal proceedings, or is any such person the subject or any order, judgment or decree involving the violation of any state or federal securities laws.

Section 16(a) Compliance.Section 16(a) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 requires that directors and executive officers, and persons who own beneficially more than ten percent (10%) of the Registrant’s Common Stock, to file reports of ownership and changes of ownership with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Copies of all filed reports are required to be furnished to the Registrant pursuant to Section 16(a). Based solely on the reports received by the Registrant and on written representations from reporting persons, the Registrant was informed that our CEO, has and the CFO and Chairmandirectors have not filed reports as required under Section 16(a).

 

NASDAQ Rule 4200.The NASDAQ Rule 4200, which sets forth several tests to determine whether a director of a listed company is independent. Rule 4200 provides that a director would not be considered independent if the director or an immediate family member accepted any compensation from the listed company in excess of $120,000 during any period of 12 consecutive months within the three years preceding the determination of independence (excluding compensation for board or board committee service, compensation paid to an immediate family member as a non-executive employee, benefits paid under a tax-qualified retirement plan and non-discretionary compensation).

Director Independence.In determining whether or not our directors are considered independent, the Company used the definition of independence as defined in NASDAQ Rule 4200. We therefore believe that only Yair Fudim is anEyal Ben-Ami and Alon Dayan are deemed to be independent director.directors.

Directors’ Term of Office.Our directors are elected to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders and until their respective successors will have been elected and will have qualified.

41

 

Audit Committee and Financial Expert, Compensation Committee, Nominations Committee.We do not have any of the above mentioned standing committees because our corporate financial affairs and corporate governance are simple in nature at this stage of development and each financial transaction is approved by our sole officer or director.

Potential Conflicts of Interest.Since we do not have an audit or compensation committee comprised of independent Directors, the functions that would have been performed by such committees are performed by our Board of Directors. Thus, there is a potential conflict of interest in that our Directors have the authority to determine issues concerning management compensation, in essence their own, and audit issues that may affect management decisions. We are not aware of any other conflicts of interest with any of our Executives or Directors.

Board’s Role in Risk Oversight.The Board assesses on an ongoing basis the risks faced by the Company. These risks include financial, technological, competitive, and operational risks. In addition, since the Company does not have an Audit Committee, the Board is also responsible for the assessment and oversight of the Company’s financial risk exposures.

 

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings.We are not aware of any material legal proceedings that have occurred within the past ten years concerning any Director or control person which involved a criminal conviction, a pending criminal proceeding, a pending or concluded administrative or civil proceeding limiting one’s participation in the securities or banking industries, or a finding of securities or commodities law violations.


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONBack

Any compensation received by our officers, directors, and management personnel will be determined from time to Tabletime by our Board of ContentsDirectors. Our officers, directors, and management personnel will be reimbursed for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred on our behalf.

The following table depicts

For the totalthree fiscal years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, we did not pay any compensation that we have paid or that has accrued on behalf ofto our chief executive officer and other executive officers, duringnor did any other person receive a total annual salary and bonus exceeding $100,000.

New Service Agreements

Subsequent to the fiscal years endingRegistrant’s year-ended December 31, 2015, 2014 and 2013.

    Annual Compensation Long Term Compensation Awards
        Other Restricted Securities  
        Annual Stock Underlying All Other
Name and Principal   Salary Bonus Compensation Award(s) Options Compensation
Position Year ($) ($) ($) ($) ($) ($)
               
Lior Wayn, CEO (1) 2015 149,064     
Lior Wayn, CEO (1) 2014 27,630     
Liron Carmel, former CEO (2) 2015 2,500     
Liron Carmel, former CEO, CFO (2) 2014      
Oded Gilboa, CFO (3) 2015 79,353     
Ivo Heiden, former CEO and CFO (4) 2013      

Executive Employment Agreements

Emerald has2017, the Registrant entered into an employmentseparate service agreements with Lior Wayn, itsYair Fudim, CEO and Oded Gilboa its CFO.

(1) Emerald’s employmentChairman, Gadi Levin, CFO and Eyal Ben-Ami, a Director, respectively. The Registrant’s service agreements provide as follows: (i) the agreement with Lior Wayn, dated January 1, 2015,Yair Fudim for serving as CEO provides for a base annual salarymonthly cash compensation of NIS46,000$2,500, payable quarterly of the first day of each fiscal quarter, and the issuance of 300,000 restricted shares of the Registrant’s common stock which is equivalent to approximately $12,000 for which Mr. Wayn is required to devote 100%shares do not vest and are not deemed fully-earned until 12 months from the February 2018 date of his business time toagreement; (ii) the affairsagreement with Gadi Levin for serving as CFO of Emerald. In addition, Mr. Wayn’sthe Registrant and its new Israeli subsidiary provides for monthly cash compensation of $7,500; and (iii) the agreement alsowith Eyal Ben-Ami for serving as a Director provides for the payment of cash bonuses as follows: (i) a bonus equal to 5% of the monthly revenues of Emerald during the years ending December 31, 2015 and 2016, payable quarterly; and (ii) a cash bonus equal to 7 months base salary only in the event that the Registrant raises at least $1,150,000 from: (i) the sale of equity securities at a price of not less than $0.80 per Share; or (ii) the exercise of warrants at an exercise price of not less than $0.80 per Share.
(2) Liron Carmel was the sole executive officer during 2014.

(3) The employment agreements between Mr. Gilboa and the Registrant and Emerald, dated March 22, 2015 and February 25, 2015, respectively, provide as follows: (i) the Registrant shall pay Mr. Gilboa cash compensation for the initial two month period a total of $2,000 following which Mr. Gilboa will be paid at the rate of $3,000 per month and, as additional compensation, the Registrant issued Mr. Gilboa 125,000 restricted Shares; and (ii) Emerald shall pay Mr. Gilboa cash compensation of NIS13,200 which is equivalent to approximately $3,450 per month.
(4) Ivo Heiden was$1,250, payable quarterly on the sole executive officer in 2013.first day of each fiscal quarter.

 

Director’s Compensation

Option GrantsOther than with respect to the service agreement with Mr. Ben-Ami, a director referenced above, our directors are not entitled to receive compensation for service rendered to us or for meeting(s) attended except for reimbursement of out-of-pocket expenses. There is no formal or informal arrangements or agreements to compensate employee directors for service provided as a director; however, compensation for new non-employee directors is determined on an ad hoc basis by the existing members of the board of directors at the time a director is elected.

Compensation Policies and Practices as They Relate to the Company’s Risk Management

We believe that our compensation policies and practices for all employees, including executive officers, do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on us.

Employment Contracts

We do not have any formal employment agreement with any of our officers. Any future compensation will be determined by the Board of Directors, and, as appropriate, an employment agreement will be executed. We do not currently have plans to pay any compensation until such time as the Company maintains a positive cash flow.

Outstanding Equity Awards

There were no individual grantsequity awards outstanding as of the end the year ended December 31, 2017.

Option Grants

During the year ended December 31, 2017, the Board of Directors did not authorize the issuance of stock options to purchase our Common Stock made to the executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table. However, the Registrant issued Class E Warrants to Lior Wayn at the Closing exercisableand directors to purchase 2,700,000 Shares in three equal tranchesshares of 900,000 Shares each, at a price of $0.0001 per Share.common stock.

 

Aggregated Option Exercises and Fiscal Year-End Option Value

 

There were no stock options exercised during periodthe year ending December 31, 20152017 by theour executive officers named in the Summary Compensation Table.officers.

 

42

Long-Term Incentive Plan ("LTIP"(“LTIP”) Awards

 

There were no awards made to a named executive officers in the last completed fiscal year under any LTIP.

 

Compensation of Directors

Directors are permitted to receive fixed fees and other compensation for their services as directors. The Board of Directors has the authority to fix the compensation of directors. No amounts have been paid to, or accrued to, directors in such capacity.

Outstanding Warrants

The following table summarizes information of outstanding warrants as of December 31, 2015:

WarrantsWarrant TermExercise PriceExercisable
Investors - Class A Warrants (1)4,149,7192 years$0.804,149,719
Investors - Class B Warrants (2)2,500,0002 years$0.402,500,000
Investors - Class C Warrants (3)  5,072,492  (3)  (3)  55,072,492
Lior Wayn - Class E Warrants (4)  2,700,000  (4)  0.0001  2,700,000

(1) The Class A Warrants were issued in connection with a private placement in reliance upon Regulation S, pursuant to which the Registrant sold a total of 4,149,719 units at a price of $0.40 per unit (the "Units"), each Unit comprised of one Share and one Class A Warrant exercisable at $0.80 per share with a term 24 months. While all of the Class A Warrants are exercisable within 60 days, in fact, none of these warrants will be exercised for the foreseeable future, based upon the exercise price of $0.80 per Share.

(2) The Class B Warrants were issued to consultants for bona fide services to the Company and are exercise, on a cashless basis at a price of $0.40 per Share for a period of two years.
(3) The Class C Unit Warrants were issued to consultants for bona fide services to the Company, and each Unit is exercisable at a price of $0.40 to purchase one Share of Common Stock and one Class A Warrant which, in turn, is exercisable to purchase one additional Share at a price of $0.80. The Class C Unit Warrants expire ninety (90) days after the effective date of this Registration Statement.
(4) The Class E Warrants were issued by the Registrant to Lior Wayn in connection with the Closing of the Share Exchange Agreement. The Class E Warrants are exercisable to purchase a total of 2,700,000 Shares, in three equal tranches of 900,000 Shares each (the "Tranches") at an exercise price of $0.0001 per Share, subject to and within 45 days of the Registrant achieving the milestones defined in the table below (the "Milestones").

MilestoneDescription
FirstThe Registrant, on a consolidated basis, obtaining five (5) medical service providers (e.g., hospitals, clinics, etc.) as pilot customers within two years of Closing.
SecondThe Registrant, on a consolidated basis, reaching an agreement with an insurer or medical service provider (e.g., insurance company or HMO), insuring or serving at least 300,000 customers, within two years of Closing.
ThirdThe Registrant, on a consolidated basis,, reaching gross revenue of $1,000,000 within any period of twelve consecutive months in which the aggregate gross revenue that may be attributed to the last three months of such period shall not be less than $400,000, within three years of Closing.

Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions and Director Independence

Mr. Ivo Heiden, our former CEO, CFO and sole director who resigned on March 24, 2014, provided securities compliance services valued at $5,250 in 2014 and $18,000 in 2013.

Indebtedness of Management

 

No officer, director or security holder known to us to own of record or beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock or any member of the immediate family or sharing the household (other than a tenant or employee) of any of the foregoing persons is indebted to us in the years 20152017 and 2014.2016.

 


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED SHAREHOLDERSTOCKHOLDER MATTERSBack to Table of Contents

The following table depicts the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of March 31, 2016.April __, 2018. The information provides the ownership information for: each person known by us to be the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our common stock; each of our directors; each of our executive officers; and our executive officers and directors as a group.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner Common Stock Beneficially Owned (1) Percentage of Common Stock Owned (1)
Lior Wayn, CEO (2)  5,474,545 29.4%
1 Emek Ayalon Street     
Modi’in, Israel     
       
Oded Gilboa, CFO  125,000 0.70%
10 Hayetsira Street     
Raanana, Israel     
       
Yair Fudim, Chairman  482,000 2.60%
Zhitomir Street     
Tel-Aviv, Israel     
       
Baruch Kfir, Director  231,000 1.20%
7 Imber Street     
Petach Tivka, 4951141, Israel     
       
Dr. Estery Giloz-Ran, Director  690,323 3.70%
57/8 Borocov     
Givataim, Israel     
       
Amir Uziel (3)  1,513,393 8.10%
42 Ben Zvi Street     
Rmat Gan, Israel     
       
Itschak Shrem (4)  1,367,429 7.30%
42 Ben Zvi Street     
Rmat Gan, Israel     
       
Lavi Krasney (5)  1,513,393 8.10%
42 Ben Zvi Street     
Rmat Gan, Israel     
Directors and Officers (5 persons)  7,002,868 40.25%
Name of Beneficial Owner Common Stock Beneficially
Owned (1)
  Percentage of Common Stock Owned (1) 
Yair Fudim, CEO and Chairman  300,000   0.51%
Khilat Zitomir        
6 Tel-Aviv, Israel        
         
Gadi Levin, CFO  0   0.00%
Moshav Azriel 108        
Lev Hasharon, Israel        
         
Eyal Ben-Ami, Director  0   0.00%
22 Ma’agal Shalom Street        
Rishon Lezion, Israel        
         
Alon Dayan, Director  0   0.00%
Shir Hashirim 39        
Elakana, Israel        
         
Tamarid Ltd.  3,064,657   5.18%
2 Kaufman Street        
Tel Aviv, Israel        
         
Universal Link Ltd.  5,320,545   8.99%
1 Hapardes Street        
Ein Vered, Israel        
         
Officers and Directors as a Group (4 persons)  300,000   0.51%

 

(1) Applicable percentage ownership is based on 18,624,46159,206,415 shares of common stock outstanding as of March 31, 2016.April __, 2018. Beneficial ownership is determined in accordance with the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission and generally includes voting or investment power with respect to securities. Shares of common stock that are currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of March 31, 2016April __, 2018 are deemed to be beneficially owned by the person holding such securities for the purpose of computing the percentage of ownership of such person but are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTORS INDEPENDENCEBack to Table of Contents

Certain Related Party Transactions

Mr. Ivo Heiden, our former CEO, CFO and sole director who resigned on March 24, 2014, provided securities compliance services valued at $5,250 in 2014.

Indebtedness of Management

No officer, director or security holder known to us to own of record or beneficially more than 5% of our Common Stock or any member of the immediate family or sharing the household (other than a tenant or employee) of any of the foregoing persons is indebted to us in the years 20152017 and 2014.2016.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICESBack to Table of Contents

Independent Public Accountants

 

The Registrant'sRegistrant’s Board of Directors has appointed M&K CPAS PLLCBrightman Almagor Zohar & Co as independent public accountant for the fiscal years ended December 31, 20152017 and 2014.2016.

43

Principal Accounting Fees

 

Principal Accounting Fees

The following table presents the fees for professional audit services rendered by M&K CPAS PLLCBrightman Almagor Zohar & Co. for the audit of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s annual financial statements for the year ended December 31, 20152017 and 20142016 and fees billed for other services rendered by M&K CPAS PLLCBrightman Almagor Zohar & Co. during those periods.

  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  December 31, 2017  December 31, 2016 
Audit fees (1) $

43,000

  $15,000 
Audit-related fees (2)      
Tax fees (3)      
All other fees      

(1)Audit fees consist of audit and review services, consents and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2)Audit-related fees consist of assistance and discussion concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other accounting issues.
(3)Tax fees consist of preparation of federal and state tax returns, review of quarterly estimated tax payments, and consultation concerning tax compliance issues.

PART IV

 

Year Ended Year Ended 
December 31, 2015December 31, 2014

Audit fees (1)

$6,500$4,600

Audit-related fees (2)

--- ---

Tax fees (3)

--- ---

All other fees

--- ---
(1) Audit fees consist of audit and review services, consents and review of documents filed with the SEC.
(2) Audit-related fees consist of assistance and discussion concerning financial accounting and reporting standards and other accounting issues.
(3) Tax fees consist of preparation of federal and state tax returns, review of quarterly estimated tax payments, and consultation concerning tax compliance issues.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULESBack to Table of Contents

(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.

Exhibit No.Description
3.1Delaware Certificate of Incorporation, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
3.1(a)Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation reflecting name change, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
3.1(b)Amendment to Certificate of Incorporation reflecting reverse stock split, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
3.2Bylaws, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
4.1 Class A Warrant Agreement,attached to the Company's Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 15, 2015.Description
4.2
31.1 Class B Warrant Agreement,attachedCertification of CEO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed withExchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the SEC on August 5, 2015.Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
4.331.2 Class C Warrant Agreement,attachedCertification of CFO pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) of the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed withExchange Act pursuant to Section 302 of the SEC on August 5, 2015.Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
4.432.1 Class E Warrant Agreement, attachedCertification of CEO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Company's Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 15, 2015.Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
10.1NNon-Binding MOU between the Registrant and Artsys 360 Ltd dated December 2, 2014, filed with Registrant’s 8-K on December 2, 2014
10.2Non-Binding MOU between the Registrant and Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. dated December 30, 2014 filed with Registrant’s 8-K on January 2, 2015
10.3Loan Agreement between the Registrant and Emerald dated February 2, 2015, filed with Registrant’s 8-K on February 13, 2015
10.4Share Exchange Agreement between the Registrant and Emerald dated March 15, 2015 filed with Registrant’s 8-K on March 16, 2015.
10.5Loan Agreement between the Registrant and Emerald dated March 19, 2015 filed with the Registrant’s 8-K on March 24, 2015
10.6Loan Agreement between the Registrant and Emerald Medical Applications Ltd. dated June 2, 2015, filed with Registrant’s Form 8-K on June 6, 2015
10.732.2 Employment Agreement between Emerald and Lior Wayn dated January 1, 2015, attachedCertification of CFO pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Company's Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 15, 2015.Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
10.899.1 

Employment Agreement between the Registrant and Oded Gilboa dated March 22, 2015, attached to the Company's Form 8-K as2017 Stock Incentive Plan, filed with the SEC on July 15, 2015.herewith.

10.944
 Employment Agreement between Emerald and Oded Gilboa dated February 25, 2015, attached to the Company's Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on July 15, 2015.
10.10Form of Look-Up Agreement between the Registrant and the Selling Security Holders and Holders of Class B Warrants,attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
10.11Corporate Advisory Services Agreement between the Registrant and Meyda Consulting Ltd.,attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
10.12Form of Consultant's Corporate Advisory Service Agreement, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on August 5, 2015.
10.13Distribution Agreement between Derma Italy SRL and Emerald dated August 12, 2015, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on October 2, 2015.
10.14Distribution Agreement between S. Bokhorst, Creatiekracht and Emerald dated December 1, 2013, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on October 2, 2015.
10.15Distribution Agreement between Medical Edge Pty Ltd. and Emerald dated February 6, 2014, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on October 2, 2015.
10.16Project Agreement between Realize S.A. and Ubitech and Emerald dated January 14, 2015, attached to the Registrant's Form S-1 as filed with the SEC on October 2, 2015.

 

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned.

EMERALD MEDICAL APPLICATIONS CORP.

By: /s/ Lior WaynVIRTUAL CRYPTO TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
Lior Wayn
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 31, 2016

By: /s/ Oded Gilboa
Oded Gilboa
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: March 31, 2016

By:/s/ Yair Fudim
Yair Fudim, Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: April 17, 2018
By:/s/ Gadi Levin
Gadi Levin, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: April 17, 2018

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

By: /s/ Yair Fudim
Yair Fudim
Chairman
Date: March 31, 2016

By: /s/ Lior Wayn
Lior Wayn
Director
Date: March 31, 2016

 

By:/s/ Yair Fudim
Yair Fudim, Chairman
Date: April 17, 2018