Table of Contents

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
  

FORM 10-K

 
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20142017
Commission File Number: 000-51398
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
  

 Federally chartered corporation 94-6000630 
 
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. employer
identification number)
 
     
 
600 California Street
San Francisco, CA
 94108 
 (Address of principal executive offices) (Zip code) 
(415) 616-1000
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
  

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B Stock, par value $100
(Title of class)
  

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    o  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    o  No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of the Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitiondefinitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o  Accelerated filer o
    
Non-accelerated filer 
x  (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
  Smaller reporting companyo
Emerging growth company o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    o  Yes    x  No
Registrant's capital stock is not publicly traded and is only issued to members of the registrant. Such capital stock is issued and redeemed at par value, $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. At June 30, 2014,2017, the aggregate par value of the capital stock held by shareholders of the registrant was approximately $4,561$3,091 million. At February 28, 2015,2018, the total shares of capital stock outstanding, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, totaled 40,220,422.

37,340,430.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.



Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
20142017 Annual Report on Form 10-K
Table of ContentContents
PART I.     
     
Item 1.   
     
Item 1A.   
     
Item 1B.   
     
Item 2.   
     
Item 3   
     
Item 4   
     
PART II.    
Item 5.  
     
Item 6.  
     
Item 7.   
    
    
    
    
    
    
   
    
    
     
Item 7A.   
     
Item 8.  
     
Item 9.  
     
Item 9A.   
     
Item 9B.  
     
PART III.     
     
Item 10.   
     
Item 11.   
     
Item 12.   
     
Item 13.   
     
Item 14.   
     
PART IV.     
     
Item 15.   
     
  




PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.BUSINESS

At the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank), our purpose is to enhance the availability of credit for residential mortgages and economic development by providing a readily available, competitively priced source of funds for housing and community lenders. We are a wholesale bank—we link our customers to the global capital markets and seek to manage our own liquidity and interest rate risk management so that funds are available when our customers need them. By providing needed liquidity and financial risk management tools, our credit programs enhance competition in the mortgage market and benefit homebuyers and communities.

We are one of 1211 regional Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) that serve the United States as part of the Federal Home Loan Bank System. Each FHLBank operates as a separate federally chartered corporation with its own board of directors, management, and employees. The FHLBanks were organized under the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), and are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs). The FHLBanks are not government agencies and do not receive financial support from taxpayers. The U.S. government does not guarantee, directly or indirectly, the debt securities or other obligations of the Bank or the FHLBank System. The FHLBanks are regulated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), an independent federal agency.

We have a cooperative ownership structure. To access our products and services, a financial institution must be approved for membership and purchase capital stock in the Bank. The member's capital stock requirement is generally based on its use of Bank products, subject to a minimum asset-based membership requirement that is intended to reflect the value to the member of having ready access to the Bank as a reliable source of competitively priced funds. Bank capital stock is issued, transferred, redeemed, and repurchased at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. It is not publicly traded.

Our members may include federally insured and regulated financial depositories, and regulated insurance companies that are engaged in residential housing finance, and community development financial institutions (CDFIs) that have been certified by the CDFI Fund of the U.S. Treasury Department.Department, and privately insured, state-chartered credit unions. Financial depositories may include commercial banks, credit unions, industrial loan companies, and savings institutions. CDFIs may include community development loan funds, community development venture capital funds, and privately insured, state-chartered credit unions. All members have a principal place of business located in Arizona, California, or Nevada, the three states that make up the Eleventh District of the FHLBank System. Our members range in size from less than $7$6 million to over $113$198 billion in assets.

Our primary business is providing competitively priced, collateralized loans, known as advances, to our members and certain qualifying housing associates. Advances may be fixed or adjustable rate, with terms ranging from one day to 30 years. We accept a wide range of collateral types, some of which cannot be readily pledged elsewhere or readily securitized. Members use their access to advances to support their mortgage loan portfolios, lower their funding costs, facilitate asset-liability management, reduce on-balance sheet liquidity, offer a wider range of mortgage products to their customers, and improve profitability.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, we had advances and capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, outstanding to the following types of institutions:


1



    Advances    Advances
(Dollars in millions)Total Number of Institutions
 Capital Stock Outstanding
 Number of Institutions
 Par Value of Advances Outstanding
Total Number of Institutions
 Capital Stock Outstanding
 Number of Institutions
 Par Value of Advances Outstanding
Commercial banks204
 $2,285
 112
 $28,580
164
 $1,764
 88
 $43,045
Savings institutions13
 151
 9
 1,287
11
 520
 7
 15,885
Credit unions116
 799
 34
 4,716
134
 913
 40
 6,664
Industrial loan companies3
 2
 3
 44
3
 2
 3
 42
Insurance companies5
 37
 1
 97
9
 40
 2
 214
Community development financial institutions5
 4
 3
 76
6
 4
 4
 78
Total member institutions346
 3,278
 162
 34,800
327
 3,243
 144
 65,928
Housing associates eligible to borrow1
 
 
 
2
 
 1
 107
Other nonmember institutions(1)
32
 719
 8
 4,030
7
 309
 5
 11,451
Total379
 $3,997
 170
 $38,830
336
 $3,552
 150
 $77,486

(1)Nonmember institutions may be former members or may have acquired the advances and capital stock of a former member. Capital stock held by nonmember shareholders is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock, a liability. Nonmember shareholders with advances outstanding are required to meet the Bank's applicable credit, collateral, and capital stock requirements, including requirements regarding creditworthiness and collateral borrowing capacity. Nonmembers (including former members and member successors) are not eligible to borrow new advances from the Bank or renew existing advances as they mature.

To fund their operations, the FHLBanks issue debt in the form of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes (jointly referred to as consolidated obligations) through the FHLBanks’ Office of Finance, the fiscal agent for the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations on behalf of the FHLBanks. Because the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations are rated AaaAaa/P-1 by Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) and AA+/A-1+ by Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (Standard & Poor’s)S&P Global Ratings (S&P) and because of the FHLBanks' GSE status, the FHLBanks are generally able to raise funds at rates that are typically at a small to moderate spread above U.S. Treasury security yields. Our cooperative ownership structure allows us to pass along the benefit of these low funding rates to our members.

Members also benefit from our affordable housing and economic development programs, which provide grants and below-market-rate loans that support members’ involvement in creating affordable housing and revitalizing communities.

Our Business Model

Our cooperative ownership structure has led us to develop a business model that is different from that of a typical financial services firm. Our business model is based on the premise that we maintain a balance between our obligation to achieve our public policy mission—objective to promote housing, homeownership, and community and economic development through our activities with members—members and our objective to provide a return on the private capital provided by our members through their investment in the Bank's capital stock. We achieve this balance by delivering low-cost credit to help our members meet the credit needs of their communities while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in the Bank's capital stock.

As a cooperatively owned wholesale bank, we require our members to purchase capital stock to support their activities with the Bank. We leverage this capital stock and the Bank’s retained earnings by using our GSE status to borrow funds in the capital markets at rates that are generally at a small to moderate spread above U.S. Treasury security yields. We lend these funds to our members at rates that are competitive with the cost of most wholesale borrowing alternatives available to our largest members.

We may also invest in residential mortgage-backed securities (MBS) up to the regulatory policy limit of three times capital.regulatory capital, composed of retained earnings and capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock. Our MBS investments include agency-issued MBS that are guaranteed through the direct obligation of or are supported by the U.S. government and private-label residential MBS (PLRMBS) that were AAA-rated at the time of purchase. We also have a portfolio of residential mortgage loans purchased from members. Earnings on these mortgage assets have historically provided us with the financial flexibility to continue providing cost-effective

2



credit and liquidity to our members. While the mortgage assets we hold are intended to increase our earnings, they

2


also modestly increase our credit and interest rate risk. In addition, the PLRMBS we hold have increased our credit risk exposure and have resulted in credit-related other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charges on certain PLRMBS since the fourth quarter of 2008. Because of these OTTI charges and the potential for future OTTI charges, these PLRMBS had a substantial negative impact on the amount of dividends paid and excess capital stock repurchased from 2009 through 2012.

Additional information about our investments and the OTTI charges associated with our PLRMBS is provided in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data– Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.Investments.

Our financial strategies are designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our member base and our members' credit needs change. Our capital increases when members are required to purchase additional capital stock as they increase their advances borrowings, or sell mortgage loans to the Bank, and it contracts when we repurchase excess capital stock from members as their advances or balances of mortgage loans sold to the Bank decline. As a result of these strategies, we have been able to achieve our mission by meeting member credit needs and maintaining our strong regulatory capital position, while paying dividends (including dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock) and repurchasing and redeeming excess capital stock. Throughout 2014,2017, the Bank continued to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of the Bank’stotal capital to the par value of the Bank’s capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock. The Bank paidAdditional information regarding the Bank’s dividends totaling $360 million and $316 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively, repurchased $2.0 billion and $3.0 billion inthe repurchase of excess capital stock is provided in 2014“Item 8. Financial Statements and 2013, respectively,Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and redeemed $296 million and $502 million in mandatorily redeemable capital stock during 2014 and 2013, respectively. Total excess capital stock was $1.1 billion and $2.4 billion as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.Dividend Framework.”

Products and Services

Advances. We offer our members a wide array of fixed and adjustable rate loans, called advances, with maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Our advance products are designed to help members compete effectively in their markets and meet the credit needs of their communities. For members that choose to retain the mortgage loans they originate as assets (portfolio lenders), advances serve as a funding source for a variety of conforming and nonconforming mortgage loans, including multifamily mortgage loans. As a result, advances support an array of housing market segments, including those focused on low- and moderate-income households. For members that sell or securitize mortgage loans and other assets, advances can provide interim funding.

Our credit products also help members with their asset-liability management. Members can use a wide range of advance types, with different maturities and payment characteristics, to match the characteristics of their assets and reduce their interest rate risk. We offer advances that are callable at the member's option and advances with embedded option features (such as caps floors, corridors, and collars)floors), which can reduce the interest rate risk associated with holding fixed rate mortgage loans and adjustable rate mortgage loans with interest rate caps in the member's portfolio.

We offer both standard and customized advance structures. Standard advances include fixed and adjustable rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, and payment characteristics. Fixed rate advances generally have maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Adjustable rate advances generally have maturities ranging from less than 30 days to 10 years, with the interest rates resetting periodically at a fixed spread to the London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) or to another specified index. Customized advances may include:
advances with non-standard indices;
advances with embedded option features (such as interest rate caps, floors, corridors, and collars, and call and put options);
amortizing advances; and

3


advances with partial prepayment symmetry. (Partial prepayment symmetry is a product feature under which the Bank may charge a prepayment fee or pay a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, if the advance is prepaid.)

For each customized advance, we typically execute a derivative with an authorized counterparty to enable us to offset the customized features embedded in the advance.

We manage the credit risk of advances and other credit products by setting the credit and collateral terms available to individual members and housing associates based on their creditworthiness and the quality and value of the assets

3



they pledge as collateral. We also have procedures to assess the mortgage loan quality and documentation standards of institutions that pledge mortgage loan collateral. In addition, we have collateral policies and restricted lending procedures in place to help manage our exposure to institutions that experience difficulty in meeting their capital requirements or other standards of creditworthiness. These credit and collateral policies balance our dual goals of meeting the needs of members and housing associates as a reliable source of liquidity and mitigating credit risk by adjusting credit and collateral terms in view of changes in member creditworthiness.

All advances must be fully collateralized. To secure advances, borrowers may pledge one- to four-family first lien residential mortgage loans, multifamily mortgage loans, MBS, U.S. government and agency securities, deposits in the Bank, and certain other real estate-related collateral, such as commercial real estate loans and second lien residential mortgage loans. We may also accept small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and vehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) as eligible collateral from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) added secured loans for community development activities as a type of collateral that we may accept from community financial institutions. The Housing Act defined community financial institutions as depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with average total assets over the preceding three-year period of $1 billion or less, to be adjusted for inflation annually by the Finance Agency. The average total asset cap for 20142017 was $1,108$1,148 million.

Pursuant to our lending agreements with our borrowers, including members, housing associates, and nonmember institutions with credit outstanding, we limit extensions of credit to a borrower to a percentage of the market value or unpaid principal balance of the borrower’s pledged collateral, known as the borrowing capacity. The borrowing capacity percentage varies according to several factors, including the charter type of the institution, the collateral type, the value assigned to the collateral, the results of our collateral field review of the borrower’s collateral, the pledging method used for loan collateral (specific identification or blanket lien), the amount of loan data provided (detailed or summary reporting), the data reporting frequency (monthly or quarterly), the borrower’s financial strength and condition, and any institution-specific collateral risks. Under the terms of our lending agreements, the aggregate borrowing capacity of a borrower’s pledged eligible collateral must meet or exceed the total amount of the borrower’s outstanding advances, other extensions of credit, and certain other borrower obligations and liabilities. We monitor each borrower’s aggregate borrowing capacity and collateral requirements on a daily basis, by comparing the institution's borrowing capacity to its obligations to us.

In addition, the total amount of advances made available to each member or housing associate may be limited by the financing availability assigned by the Bank, which is generally expressed as a percentage of the member’s or housing associate’s assets. The amount of financing availability is generally determined by the creditworthiness of the member or housing associate.

Throughout2014, weWe regularly reviewedreview and adjustedadjust our lending parameters in light of changing market conditions, both negative and positive, and periodically adjustedadjust the maximum borrowing capacity of certain collateral types. When necessary, we requiredrequire additional collateral to fully secure advances.

Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, our credit analyses of our borrowers' financial condition, and our credit extension and collateral policies, we expect to collect all amounts due according to the contractual

4


terms of the advances. Therefore, no allowance for losses on advances was deemed necessary by the Bank in 2014.2017. We have never experienced any credit losses on advances.

When a borrower prepays an advance prior to its original maturity, we may charge the borrower a prepayment fee, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, at the time the advance is prepaid. For an advance with partial prepayment symmetry, we may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the member a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances at the time the advance is prepaid. Our prepayment fee policy is designed to recover at least the net economic costs, if any, associated with the reinvestment of the advance prepayment proceeds or the cost to terminate the funding associated with the prepaid advance, which generally enables us to be financially indifferent to the prepayment of the advance.

4




Because of the funding alternatives available to our largest borrowers, we establish advances prices that take into account the cost of alternative market choices available to our largest members each day. We offer the same advances prices to all members each day, which means that all members benefit from this pricing strategy. In addition, if further price concessions are negotiated with any member to reflect market conditions on a given day, those price concessions are also made available to all members for the same product with the same terms on the same day.

Standby Letters of Credit. We issue standby letters of credit to support certain obligations of members to third parties. Members may use standby letters of credit issued by the Bank to facilitate residential housing finance and community lending, to achieve liquidity and asset-liability management goals, to secure certain state and local agency deposits, and to provide credit support to certain tax-exempt bonds. Our underwriting and collateral requirements for standby letters of credit are generally the same as our underwriting and collateral requirements for advances, but may differ in cases where member creditworthiness is impaired.

Investments. We invest in high-quality non-MBS investments to facilitate our role as a cost-effective provider of credit and liquidity to members and to enhance the Bank's earnings. We have adopted credit policies and exposure limits for investments that support liquidity and diversification of risk. These policies restrict the amounts and terms of our investments according to our own capital position as well as the capital and creditworthiness of the individual counterparties, with different unsecured credit limit policies for members and nonmembers.

We invest in short-term unsecured Federal funds sold, negotiable certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. We may also invest in short-term secured transactions, such as U.S. Treasury or agency securities resale agreements. When we execute non-MBS investments with members, we may give consideration to their secured credit availability with the Bank and our advances price levels.

We may invest in short-term unsecured interest-bearing deposits, Federal funds sold, negotiable certificates of deposit, and commercial paper. We may also invest in short-term secured transactions, such as U.S. Treasury resale agreements. Our investments also include bonds issued by the Federal Farm Credit Banks, all of which are rated Aaa/(P)P-1Aaa by Moody’s and AA+/A-1+ by Standard & Poor’s.S&P. In addition, we may invest in housing finance agency bonds issued by housing finance agencies located in Arizona, California, and Nevada, the three states that make up the Eleventh District of the FHLBank System. These bonds are federally taxable mortgage revenue bonds, (federally taxable) and are collateralized by pools of first lien residential mortgage loans and credit-enhanced by bond insurance. The bonds we hold are issued by the California Housing Finance Agency.

In addition, our investments include PLRMBS, all of which were AAA-rated at the time of purchase, and agency residential MBS, which are guaranteed through the direct obligation of, or are supported by, the U.S. government. Some of these PLRMBS were issued by and/or purchased from members, former members, or their respective affiliates. We execute all MBS investments without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the investment as a nonmember, member, or affiliate of a member. The Bank has not purchased any PLRMBS since the first quarter of 2008.

Additional information about our investments and OTTI charges associated with our PLRMBS is provided in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”


5


Mortgage Loans. Under the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®) Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and FHA/VA-insured mortgage loans from members forinsured by the Bank’s own portfolioFederal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) under the Original MPF and MPF Government products.product. In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra® product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage

5



loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance,” “MPF,” and “MPF Xtra” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.)

The Bank has approved four23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in the fourth quarter of 2013. We previously purchased conventional conforming fixed rate residential mortgage loans from participating financial institutions from May 2002 to October 2006. Our renewed participation in theThe MPF Program allows us to further serve the needs of our members by offering them a competitive alternative secondary market channel for their mortgage originations. ItThe MPF Government and MPF Government MBS products also allowsallow us to offer members a new tool, through the MPF Government product,mechanism to help low- and moderate-income homeowners and first-time homebuyers.

Affordable Housing Program. Through our Affordable Housing Program (AHP), we provide subsidies to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for households earning up to 80% of the median income for the area in which they live. Each year, to fund the AHP, we set aside 10% of the current year's incomenet earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for the AHP,AHP), to be awarded in the following year. Since 1990, we have awarded $847 million$1.0 billion in AHP subsidies to support the purchase, development, or rehabilitation of approximately 117,000132,000 affordable homes.

We allocate at least 65% of our annual AHP subsidy to our competitive AHP, under which applications for specific owner-occupied and rental housing projects are submitted by members and are evaluated and scored by the Bank in an annual competitive process. All subsidies for the competitive AHP are funded to affordable housing sponsors or developers through our members in the form of direct subsidies or subsidized advances.

We allocate the remainder of our annual AHP subsidy, up to 35%, to our two homeownership set-aside programs, the Individual Development and Empowerment Account Program and the Workforce Initiative Subsidy for Homeownership Program. Under these programs, members reserve funds from the Bank to be used as matching grants for eligible first-time homebuyers.

Access to Housing and Economic Assistance for Development (AHEAD) Program. AHEAD Program grants, funded annually at the discretion of our Board of Directors, provide early-stage funding for targeted economic development projects and non-AHP-eligible affordable housing initiatives that create or preserve jobs, facilitate improvements to public or private infrastructure, or deliver social services, training or education programs, or provide other services and programs that benefit lower-income neighborhoods.low- and moderate-income communities. AHEAD Program applications are submitted by members working with local community groups, and awards are based on project eligibility and evaluation of the applications. In 2014,2017, the Bank awarded $1$1.5 million in AHEAD Program grants.

Discounted Credit Programs. We offer members two discounted credit programs available in the form of advances and standby letters of credit. Members may use the Community Investment Program to fund mortgages for low- and moderate-income households, to finance first-time homebuyer programs, to create and maintain affordable housing, and to support other eligible lending activities related to housing for low- and moderate-income families. Members may use the Advances for Community Enterprise (ACE) Program to fund projects and activities that create or retain jobs or provide services or other benefits for low- and moderate-income people and communities. Members may also use ACE Program funds to support eligible community lending and economic development, including small business, community facilities, and public works projects.

Funding Sources

We obtain most of our funds from the sale of the FHLBanks' debt instruments (consolidated obligations), which consist of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes. The consolidated obligations are issued through the Office of Finance using authorized securities dealers and are backed only by the financial resources of the

6


FHLBanks. As provided by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The regulations provide a

6



general framework for addressing the possibility that an FHLBank may be unable to repay the consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. For more information, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.” We have never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2014,2017, and through the date of this report, we do not believe that it is probable that we will be asked to do so.

The Bank’s status as a GSE is critical to maintaining its access to the capital markets. Although consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks and are not guaranteed by the U.S. government, the capital markets have traditionally treated the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as comparable to federal agency debt, providing the FHLBanks with access to funding at relatively favorable rates. As of December 31, 2014, Standard & Poor’s2017, S&P rated the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations AA+/A-1+, and Moody’s rated them Aaa.Aaa/P-1. As of December 31, 2014, Standard & Poor’s2017, S&P assigned each of the FHLBanks a long-term credit rating of AA with a stable outlook to the FHLBank of Seattle and of AA+ with a stable outlook, to the other FHLBanks, including the Bank, and Moody's assigned each of the FHLBanks a long-term credit rating of Aaa with a stable outlook. Changes in the long-term credit ratings of individual FHLBanks do not necessarily affect the credit rating of the consolidated obligations issued on behalf of the FHLBanks. Rating agencies may change or withdraw a rating from time to time because of various factors, including operating results or actions taken, business developments, or changes in their opinion regarding, among other factors, the general outlook for a particular industry or the economy.

Regulations govern the issuance of debt on behalf of the FHLBanks and related activities. All new debt is jointly issued by the FHLBanks through the Office of Finance, which serves as their fiscal agent in accordance with the FHLBank Act and applicable regulations. Pursuant to these regulations, the Office of Finance, often in conjunction with the FHLBanks, has adopted policies and procedures for consolidated obligations that may be issued by the FHLBanks. The policies and procedures relate to the frequency and timing of issuance, issue size, minimum denomination, selling concessions, underwriter qualifications and selection, currency of issuance, interest rate change or conversion features, call or put features, principal amortization features, and selection of clearing organizations and outside counsel. The Office of Finance has responsibility for facilitating and approving the issuance of the consolidated obligations in accordance with these policies and procedures. In addition, the Office of Finance has the authority to redirect, limit, or prohibit the FHLBanks' requests to issue consolidated obligations that are otherwise allowed by its policies and procedures if it determines that its action is consistent with: (i) the regulatory requirement that consolidated obligations be issued efficiently and at the lowest all-in cost over time, consistent with prudent risk management practices, prudent debt parameters, short- and long-term market conditions, and the FHLBanks' status as GSEs; (ii) maintaining reliable access to the short-term and long-term capital markets; and (iii) positioning the issuance of debt to take advantage of current and future capital markets opportunities. The authority of the Office of Finance to redirect, limit, or prohibit the Bank's requests for issuance of consolidated obligations has never adversely affected the Bank's ability to finance its operations. The Office of Finance also services all outstanding FHLBank debt, serves as a source of information for the FHLBanks on developments in the capital markets, and prepares the FHLBanks' quarterly and annual combined financial reports. In addition, it administers the Resolution Funding Corporation and the Financing Corporation, two corporations established by Congress in the 1980s to provide funding for the resolution and disposition of insolvent savings institutions.

Consolidated Obligation Bonds. Consolidated obligations are generally issued with either fixed rate payment terms or adjustable rate payment terms, which use a variety of indices for interest rate resets, including LIBOR, the Federal funds effective rate, and others. (In the aggregate, the FHLBanks may represent a significant percentage of the Federal funds sold market at any one time, although each FHLBank manages its investment portfolio separately.)LIBOR. In addition, to meet the specific needs of certain investors, fixed rate and adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain certain embedded features, which may result in call options and complex coupon payment terms. In general, when such consolidated obligation bonds are issued for which the Bank is the primary

7


obligor, we simultaneously enter into interest rate exchange agreements containing offsetting features to, in effect, convert the terms of the bond to the terms of a simple adjustable rate bond (tied to an index, such as those listed above). Typically, the maturities of these securities range from 16 months to 15 years, but the maturities are not subject to any statutory or regulatory limit. Consolidated obligation bonds may be issued and distributed daily through negotiated or competitively bid transactions with approved underwriters or selling group members.
 

7



We receive 100% of the net proceeds of a bond issued through direct negotiation with underwriters of debt when we are the only FHLBank involved in the negotiation. In these cases, the Bank is the sole primary obligor on the consolidated obligation bond. When the Bank and one or more other FHLBanks jointly negotiate the issuance of a bond directly with underwriters, we receive the portion of the proceeds of the bond agreed upon with the other FHLBank(s); in those cases, the Bank is the primary obligor for a pro rata portion of the bond, including all customized features and terms, based on the proceeds received.

We may also request specific amounts of specific consolidated obligation bonds to be offered by the Office of Finance for sale in a competitive auction conducted with the underwriters in a bond selling group. One or more other FHLBanks may also request amounts of those same bonds to be offered for sale for their benefit in the same auction. We may receive zero to 100% of the proceeds of the bonds issued in a competitive auction depending on: (i) the amounts of and costs for the consolidated obligation bonds bid by underwriters; (ii) the maximum costs we or other FHLBanks participating in the same issue, if any, are willing to pay for the bonds; and (iii) guidelines for the allocation of bond proceeds among multiple participating FHLBanks administered by the Office of Finance.

Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes. The FHLBanks also issue consolidated obligation discount notes with maturities ranging from one day to one year, which may be offered daily through a consolidated obligation discount note selling group and through other authorized underwriters. Discount notes are issued at a discount and mature at par.

On a daily basis, we may request specific amounts of discount notes with specific maturity dates to be offered by the Office of Finance at a specific cost for sale to underwriters in the discount note selling group. One or more other FHLBanks may also request amounts of discount notes with the same maturities to be offered for sale for their benefit the same day. The Office of Finance commits to issue discount notes on behalf of the participating FHLBanks when underwriters in the selling group submit orders for the specific discount notes offered for sale. We may receive zero to 100% of the proceeds of the discount notes issued through this sales process depending on: (i) the maximum costs we or other FHLBanks participating in the same discount note issuance, if any, are willing to pay for the discount notes; (ii) the order amounts for the discount notes submitted by underwriters; and (iii) guidelines for the allocation of discount note proceeds among multiple participating FHLBanks administered by the Office of Finance.

Twice weekly, we may also request specific amounts of discount notes with fixed terms to maturity ranging from 4 to 26 weeks to be offered by the Office of Finance for sale in a competitive auction conducted with underwriters in the discount note selling group. One or more other FHLBanks may also request amounts of those same discount notes to be offered for sale for their benefit in the same auction. The discount notes offered for sale in a competitive auction are not subject to a limit on the maximum costs the FHLBanks are willing to pay. We may receive zero to 100% of the proceeds of the discount notes issued in a competitive auction depending on: (i) the amounts of and costs for the discount notes bid by underwriters and (ii) guidelines for the allocation of discount note proceeds among multiple participating FHLBanks administered by the Office of Finance.

Debt Investor Base. The FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations have traditionally had a diversified funding base of domestic and foreign investors. Purchasers of the FHLBanks' consolidated obligations include fund managers, commercial banks, pension funds, insurance companies, foreign central banks, state and local governments, and retail investors. These purchasers are also diversified geographically, with a significant portion of investors historically located in the United States, Europe, and Asia.


8


Segment Information

We use an analysis of the Bank’s financial performanceresults based on the balancesfinancial components and adjusted net interest income of two operating segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business, as well as other financial information, to review and assess financial performance and determine financial management strategies related to determine the allocationoperations of resources to these two business segments. For purposes of segment reporting, adjusted net interest income includes interest income and expenses associated with net settlements from economic hedges that

8



are recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities” in other income and excludes interest expense that is recorded in “Mandatorily redeemable capital stock.” Other key financial information, such as any credit-related OTTI charges on our PLRMBS or other expenses and assessments, is not included in the segment reporting analysis, but is incorporated into our overall assessment of financial performance.

The advances-related business consists of advances and other credit products, related financing and hedging instruments, liquidity and other non-MBS investments associated with our role as a liquidity provider, and capital stock. Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on all assets associated with the business activity in this segment and the cost of funding those activities, including the cash flowsnet settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements.agreements, and from earnings on invested capital.

The mortgage-related business consists of MBS investments, mortgage loans acquired through the MPF Program, the consolidated obligations specifically identified as funding those assets, and the related hedging instruments. Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on the MBS and mortgage loans and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding those assets, includingassets. This includes the cash flowsnet settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements and net accretion of related income, which is a result of improvement in expected cash flows on certain other-than-temporarily-impaired PLRMBS, less the provision for credit losses on mortgage loans.

Additional information about business segments is provided in “Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition – Segment Information” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data– Note 17 – Segment Information.”

Use of Interest Rate Exchange Agreements

We use interest rate exchange agreements, also known as derivatives, as part of our interest rate risk management and funding strategies to reduce identified risksfunding costs and interest rate risk inherent in the ordinary course of business. The types of derivatives we may use include interest rate swaps (including callable, putable, and basis swaps); swaptions; and interest rate cap floor, corridor, and collarfloor agreements.

The regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks and the Bank's Risk Management Policy establish guidelines for our use of derivatives. These regulations and guidelines prohibit trading in derivatives for profit and any other speculative purposes and limit the amount of credit risk allowable from derivatives.derivative counterparties.

We primarily use derivatives to manage our exposure to market risk from changes in interest rates. The goal of our interest ratemarket risk management strategy is not to eliminate interest ratemarket risk, but to manage it within appropriate limits that are consistent with the financial strategies approved by the Board of Directors. One key way we manage interest ratemarket risk is to acquire and maintain a portfolio of assets and liabilities, which, together with their associated derivatives, are conservatively matched with respect to the expected maturities or repricings of the assets and the liabilities. We may also use derivatives to adjust the effective maturity, repricing frequency or option characteristics of financial instruments (such as advances and consolidated obligations) to achieve risk management objectives.

We measure the Bank’s market risk at the enterprise level, as well as on a portfolio basis, taking into account all financial instruments. The market risk of the derivatives and the hedged items is included in the measurement of our various market risk measures, including duration gap (the difference between the expected weighted average maturities of our assets and liabilities, net of the related derivatives), which was less than one month at December 31, 2014. Thismeasures. The Bank’s low interest rate risk profile reflects our conservative asset-liability mix, which is supported by integrated use of derivatives in our daily financial management.

9



Additional information about our interest rate exchange agreements is provided in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Market Risk – Total Bank Market Risk – Interest Rate Exchange Agreements” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”


9



Capital

From its enactment in 1932, the FHLBank Act provided for a subscription-based capital structure for the FHLBanks. The amount of capital stock that each FHLBank issued was determined by a statutory formula establishing how much FHLBank capital stock each member was required to purchase. With the enactment of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, Congress replaced the statutory subscription-based member capital stock purchase formula with requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital for the FHLBanks and required the FHLBanks to develop new capital plans to replace the previous statutory structure.

We implemented our capital plan on April 1, 2004. The capital plan bases the stock purchase requirement on the level of activity a member has with the Bank, subject to a minimum membership requirement that is intended to reflect the value to the member of having access to the Bank as a funding source. With the approval of the Board of Directors, we may adjust these requirements from time to time within limitsthe ranges established in the capital plan. Any changes to our capital plan must be approved by our Board of Directors and the Finance Agency.
 
Bank capital stock cannot be publicly traded, and under the capital plan, may be issued, transferred, redeemed, and repurchased only at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. Under the capital plan, a member's capital stock will be redeemed by the Bank upon five years' notice from the member, subject to certain conditions. In addition, we have the discretion to repurchase excess capital stock from members. Ranges

Dividends and Retained Earnings. The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) summarizes the Bank’s capital management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices with respect to restricted retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock.

As required by the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, the Framework is reviewed at least annually by the Bank’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may amend the Framework from time to time. In January 2017, the Framework was amended and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors to include the Bank’s dividend philosophy to endeavor to pay a quarterly dividend at an annualized rate between 5% and 7%. The decision to declare any dividend and the dividend rate are at the discretion of the Bank’s Board of Directors, which may choose to follow the dividend philosophy as guidance in the dividend declaration. The Bank’s historical dividend rates and the dividend philosophy are not indicative of future dividend declarations. The Bank’s dividend policy may be revised or eliminated in the future and there can be no assurance as to future dividends.

In accordance with the Framework, the Bank retains certain amounts in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available for dividends in the current dividend period, and maintains an amount of total retained earnings at least equal to its required retained earnings as described in the Framework. The Bank may be restricted from paying dividends if it is not in compliance with any of its minimum capital requirements or if payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of its minimum capital requirements. In addition, the Bank may not pay dividends if any principal or interest due on any consolidated obligation has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, or, under certain circumstances, if the Bank fails to satisfy certain liquidity requirements under applicable regulations.

The regulatory liquidity requirements state that each FHLBank must: (i) maintain eligible high quality assets (advances with a maturity not exceeding five years, U.S. Treasury securities investments, and deposits in banks or trust companies) in an amount equal to or greater than the deposits received from members, and (ii) hold contingent liquidity in an amount sufficient to meet its liquidity needs for at least five business days without access to the consolidated obligations markets. At December 31, 2017, advances maturing within five years totaled $76.6 billion, significantly in excess of the $281 million of member deposits on that date. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, the Bank held estimated total sources of funds in an amount that would have been builtallowed the Bank to meet its liquidity needs for more than five consecutive business days without issuing new consolidated obligations, subject to certain conditions. For more information, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Liquidity Risk.”

10



The Bank’s Risk Management Policy limits the payment of dividends based on the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock. If this ratio at the end of any quarter is less than 100% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and if this ratio is less than 70%, the Bank would be restricted from paying a dividend. For more information, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Market Risk.”

Restricted Retained Earnings – The Bank’s Framework assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to be retained in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available in the current dividend period. Prior to July 2017, the Bank’s Framework had three categories of restricted retained earnings: Valuation Adjustments, Other (which represented a targeted amount), and the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE Agreement). In 2011, the FHLBanks entered into a JCE Agreement, intended to enhance the capital planposition of each FHLBank by allocating a portion of each FHLBank’s earnings to allow usa separate retained earnings account at that FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, each FHLBank is required to adjustallocate 20% of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the stock purchase requirements,balance of the account equals at least 1% of that FHLBank’s average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter. Under the JCE Agreement, these restricted retained earnings will not be available to pay dividends. Under the Framework, the Bank’s required amount of restricted retained earnings was determined using the Bank’s retained earnings methodology. As determined using the Bank’s methodology, from July 2015 to January 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,000, and from January 2017 to July 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,300.

In July 2017, the Bank’s Board of Directors approved the transfer of all amounts classified as needed,restricted retained earnings, other than the amounts related to the JCE Agreement, to unrestricted retained earnings. As a conforming change related to the transfer, the Bank’s Board of Directors amended the Framework to eliminate two of the categories of restricted retained earnings (Valuation Adjustments and Other) and approved revisions to the rangesBank’s retained earnings methodology to provide for a required level of total retained earnings of $2,300 for loss protection, capital compliance, and business growth. In January 2018, the methodology was further revised to provide a required level of total retained earnings of $2,500. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the JCE Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings.

The Bank’s retained earnings requirement may be revisedchanged at any time. The Board of Directors periodically reviews the retained earnings methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate.

Dividend Payments – Finance Agency rules state that FHLBanks may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings, and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. There is no requirement that the Board of Directors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Board of Directors at any time,to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the approvalrequirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

In addition, Finance Agency.Agency rules do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if its excess
capital stock exceeds 1% of its total assets. Excess capital stock is defined as the aggregate of the capital stock held by each shareholder in excess of its minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan. Additional information about our capital, including dividends and retained earnings, is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital.”


11



Competition

Demand for Bank advances is affected by many factors, including the availability and cost of other sources of funding for members, including retail and brokered deposits. We compete with our members' other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured. These suppliers may include securities dealers, commercial banks, and other FHLBanks for members with affiliated institutions that are members of other FHLBanks.

Under the FHLBank Act and regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, affiliated institutions in different FHLBank districts may be members of different FHLBanks. Two of the five institutions with the highest levels of advances outstanding from the Bank as of December 31, 2014, have affiliated institutions that are members of other FHLBanks, and these institutions may have access, through their affiliates, to funding from those other FHLBanks. For further information about these institutions, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Concentration Risk – Advances.”

Members may have access to alternative funding sources through sales of securities under agreements to resell. Some members, particularly larger members, may have access to many more funding alternatives, including independent access to the national and global credit markets. The availability of alternative funding sources for members can significantly influence the demand for our advances and can vary as a result of many factors, including market conditions, members' creditworthiness, members' strategic objectives, and the availability of collateral.

Our ability to compete successfully for the advances business of our members depends primarily on our advances prices, ability to fund advances through the issuance of consolidated obligations at competitive rates, credit and collateral terms, prepayment terms, product features such as embedded option features, ability to meet members'

10


specific requests on a timely basis, capital stock requirements, retained earnings policy, excess capital stock repurchase policies, and dividends.

In addition, the FHLBanks compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs, as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities, for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs or lower amounts of debt issued at the same cost.

Regulatory Oversight, Audits, and Examinations

The FHLBanks are supervised and regulated by the Finance Agency, an independent agency in the executive branch of the U.S. government. The Finance Agency is also responsible for supervising and regulating Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Finance Agency is supported entirely by assessments from the FHLBanks, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. With respect to the FHLBanks, the Finance Agency is charged with ensuring that the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission, remain adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets, and operate in a safe and sound manner. The Finance Agency also establishes regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

The Finance Agency has broad supervisory authority over the FHLBanks, including, but not limited to, the power to suspend or remove any entity-affiliated party (including any director, officer, or employee) of an FHLBank who violates certain laws or commits certain other acts; to issue and serve a notice of charges upon an FHLBank or any entity-affiliated party; to obtain a cease and desist order, or a temporary cease and desist order, to stop or prevent any unsafe or unsound practice or violation of law, order, rule, regulation, or condition imposed in writing; to issue civil money penalties against an FHLBank or an entity-affiliated party; to require an FHLBank to take certain actions, or refrain from certain actions, under the prompt corrective action provisions that authorize or require the Finance Agency to take certain supervisory actions, including the appointment of a conservator or receiver for an FHLBank under certain conditions; and to require any one or more of the FHLBanks to repay the primary obligations of another FHLBank on outstanding consolidated obligations.

Pursuant to the Housing Act, the Finance Agency exercises prompt corrective action authority over the FHLBanks. The Capital Classification and Prompt Corrective Action rule establishes the criteria for each of the following capital classifications for the FHLBanks specified in the Housing Act: adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized. Under the rule, unless the Finance Agency has reclassified an FHLBank based on factors other than its capital levels, an FHLBank is adequately capitalized if it has sufficient total and permanent capital to meet or exceed both its risk-based and minimum capital requirements;

12



is undercapitalized if it fails to meet one or more of its risk-based or minimum capital requirements, but is not significantly undercapitalized; is significantly undercapitalized if its total or permanent capital is less than 75% of what is required to meet any of its requirements, but it is not critically undercapitalized; and is critically undercapitalized if its total capital is equal to or less than 2% of its total assets.

By letter dated December 19, 2014,11, 2017, the Director of the Finance Agency notified the Bank that, based on September 30, 2014,2017, financial information, the Bank met the definition of adequately capitalized under the Finance Agency's Capital Classification and Prompt Corrective Action rule.

The Housing Act and Finance Agency regulations govern capital distributions by an FHLBank, which include cash dividends, capital stock dividends, capital stock repurchases, or any transaction in which the FHLBank purchases or retires any instrument included in its capital. Under the Housing Act and Finance Agency regulations, an FHLBank may not make a capital distribution if after doing so it would not be adequately capitalized or would be reclassified to a lower capital classification, or if such distribution violates any statutory or regulatory restriction, and, in the case of a significantly undercapitalized FHLBank, an FHLBank may not make any capital distribution without approval from the Director of the Finance Agency.


11


To assess the safety and soundness of the Bank, the Finance Agency conducts an annual on-site examination of the Bank and other periodic reviews of its financial operations. In addition, we are required to submit information on our financial condition and results of operations each month to the Finance Agency.

Finance Agency regulations require that the Bank’s strategic business plan describe how our business activities will achieve our mission, consistent with the Finance Agency’s core mission assets (CMA) guidance. The Finance Agency will assess annually each FHLBank’s core mission achievement by determining the ratio of primary mission assets, which includes the average par balances of advances and mortgage loans acquired from members, to the average par balance of consolidated obligations. Our core mission activities primarily include the issuance of advances. In accordance with regulations governingaddition, we acquire member assets through the operationsMPF program. The Bank’s CMA ratio was 74.06% for the year ended December 31, 2017, which exceeded the Finance Agency’s recommended minimum ratio of the FHLBanks, we registered our70%.

The Bank’s capital stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) under Section 12(g)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act), and, the registration became effective on August 29, 2005. Asas a result, of this registration, we are required to comply with the disclosure and reporting requirements of the 1934 Act and to file annual, quarterly, and current reports with the SEC, as well as meet other SEC requirements.

Our Board of Directors has an audit committee, and we have an internal audit department. An independent registered public accounting firm audits our annual financial statements. The independent registered public accounting firm conducts these audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).

Like other federally chartered corporations, the FHLBanks are subject to general congressional oversight. Each FHLBank must submit annual management reports to Congress, the President, the Office of Management and Budget, and the Comptroller General. These reports include a statement of financial condition, a statement of operations, a statement of cash flows, a statement of internal accounting and administrative control systems, and the report of the independent registered public accounting firm on the financial statements.

The U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) has been given regulatory authority over derivatives tradingderivative transactions pursuant to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, and the FHLBanks are subject to the rules promulgated by the CFTC with respect to their derivatives activities. These rules affect all aspects of the Bank’s derivatives activities by establishing new requirements relating to derivatives recordkeeping and reporting, clearing, execution, and margining of uncleared derivativesderivative transactions.

The Comptroller General has authority under the FHLBank Act to audit or examine the Finance Agency and the FHLBanks and to determine the extent to which they fairly and effectively fulfill the purposes of the FHLBank Act.

13



Furthermore, the Government Corporations Control Act provides that the Comptroller General may review any audit of the financial statements conducted by an independent registered public accounting firm. If the Comptroller General conducts such a review, then he or she must report the results and provide his or her recommendations to Congress, the Office of Management and Budget, and the relevant FHLBank. The Comptroller General may also conduct his or her own audit of any financial statements of an FHLBank.

The U.S. Treasury, or a permitted designee, is authorized under the combined provisions of the Government Corporations Control Act and the FHLBank Act to prescribe: the form, denomination, maturity, interest rate, and conditions to which FHLBank debt will be subject; the way and time FHLBank debt is issued; and the price for which FHLBank debt will be sold. The U.S. Treasury may purchase FHLBank debt up to an aggregate principal amount of $4.0 billion pursuant to the standards and terms of the FHLBank Act.

All of the FHLBanks' financial institution members are subject to federal or state laws and regulations, and changes to these laws or regulations or to related policies might adversely or favorably affect the business of the FHLBanks.

Available Information

The SEC maintains a website at www.sec.gov that contains all electronically filed or furnished SEC reports, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K, as well as any amendments. On our website at www.fhlbsf.com, we provide a link to the page on the SEC website that lists all of these reports. These reports may also be read and copied at the SEC's Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. (Further information about the operation of the Public Reference Room may be obtained at 1-800-SEC-0330.) In addition, we provide direct links from our website to our annual report on Form 10-K and our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q on the SEC website as soon as reasonably

12


practicable after electronically filing or furnishing the reports to the SEC. (Note: The website addresses of the SEC and the Bank have been included as inactive textual references only. Information on those websites is not part of this report.)

Employees

We had 255287 employees at December 31, 2014.2017. Our employees are not represented by a collective bargaining unit, and we consider our relationship with our employees to be satisfactory.

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS

The following discussion summarizes certain of the risks and uncertainties that the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) faces. The list is not exhaustive and there may be other risks and uncertainties that are not described below that may also affect our business. Any of these risks or uncertainties, if realized, could negatively affect our financial condition or results of operations or limit our ability to fund advances, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Economic weakness could adversely affect the business of many of our members and our business and results of operations.

Our business and results of operations are sensitive to conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, as well as general business and economic conditions. There continue to be challenges to the ongoingWhile economic conditions improved and credit standards eased in 2017, geopolitical instability, trade disruptions, or a sustained capital market correction could weaken consumer and business confidence and depress personal consumption and business investment. These factors could, in turn, adversely affect overall economic and housing recovery because of tight credit standardsmarket conditions. If economic and the lack of real wage growth, which could deter potential home buyers from taking advantage of low mortgage interest rates. If thesehousing market conditions remain unchanged or deteriorate, the Bank’s business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

If adverse
14



Adverse trends reappear in the mortgage lending sector, including declines in housing prices or deterioration in loan performance trends, could trigger a reduction could occur in the value of collateral pledged to the Bank to secure member credit and in the fair value of the Bank’s mortgage-backed securities (MBS) investments.

AdverseChanging economic conditions may contribute to deterioration inslow or reverse home price appreciation experienced since 2012 and negatively affect the credit quality of ourBank’s MBS and mortgage loan portfolios, and could have an adverse impact onadversely affecting our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

During 2008Gains in home price appreciation were led, in part, by highly accommodative global monetary policy and continuing through 2011,an improving employment market. However, there can be no assurance that these conditions will continue. The rebound in developed market economies may lead global central banks to pull back from negative nominal and real rates. GSE reform could substantially raise the U.S.cost of secondary market mortgage financing. Recent tax changes have reduced the tax incentive for home ownership slightly. A significant decline in housing market experienced significant adverse trends, including significant price depreciation in some markets and high mortgage loan delinquency and default rates, which contributed to high delinquency rates onprices could adversely affect the mortgage loans underlying ourBank’s private-label residential MBS (PLRMBS) portfolio. Credit-related other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) charges on certain of our PLRMBSand mortgage loan portfolio, which may adversely affected our earnings as a result of these conditions. If significant adverse trends reappear, there may be further OTTI charges and further adverse effects on ouraffect the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends, and ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock. Furthermore, economic deterioration, either in the U.S. as a whole or in specific regions of the country, could result in rising mortgage loan delinquencies and increased risk of credit losses, and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Loan servicing and modification programs or legal actions could adversely affect the value of our MBS.

Loan modification programs, as well as future legislative, regulatory or other actions, including amendments to the bankruptcy laws, that result in the modification of outstanding mortgage loans may adversely affect the value of and the returns on our MBS. In addition, legal actions relating to mortgage loan servicing and modifications could adversely affect the members, counterparties, and servicers of the Bank's mortgage collateral and the value of our PLRMBS.


13


Market uncertainty and volatility may adversely affect our business, profitability, or results of operations.

Adverse conditions in the housing and mortgage markets, or GSE restructuring that weakens the government’s commitment to encourage home ownership as a pillar of financial security, could result in a decrease in the availability of corporate credit and liquidity within the mortgage industry, causing disruptions in the operations of mortgage originators, including some of our borrowers.members. We continue to be subject to potential adverse effects on our financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends, and ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock should the economic recovery stall or reverse course.conditions significantly deteriorate.

Weaknesses in the housing and mortgage markets may undermine the need for wholesale funding and have a negative impact on the demand for advances.

While the housing and mortgage markets continued to recoverRecent changes in terms of sales and financing activity in 2014, low yields on mortgages, ongoing aversion to risk, emphasis on the origination of government-sponsored enterprise (GSE) conforming products, and a focus on improving credit quality rather than expanding production resulted in low levels of residential portfolio lending activity for some members, whichtax law that reduced the needtax advantages to home ownership may reduce mortgage lending at member institutions and may reduce their demand for wholesale mortgage funding. A negative trend in the housing and mortgage marketsThis could result in a further decline in advance levels and adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.operations.

Changes in or limits on our ability to access the capital markets could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Our primary source of funds is the sale of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank) System consolidated obligations in the capital markets. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of consolidated obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, such as investor demand and liquidity in the financial markets. The sale of FHLBank System consolidated obligations can also be influenced by factors other than conditions in the capital markets, including legislative and regulatory developments and government programs and policies that affect the relative attractiveness of FHLBank System consolidated obligation bonds or discount notes.obligations. In addition, the level of dealer participation and support also affect liquidity in the agency debt markets. Based on these factors, we may not be able to obtain funding on acceptable terms. If we cannot access funding on acceptable terms when needed, our ability to support and continue our operations could be adversely affected, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Limitations on the payment of dividends and repurchase of excess capital stock may adversely affect the effective operationattractiveness to members of the Bank's business model.

Our business model is based on the premise that we maintain a balance between our obligation to achieve our public policy mission—objective to promote housing, homeownership, and community and economic development through our activities with members—members and our objective to provide a reasonable return on the private capital provided by our members. We achieve this balance by delivering low-cost

15



credit to help our members meet the credit needs of their communities while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in the Bank’s capital stock. Our financial strategies are designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our member base and our members' credit needs change. Our capital increases when members are required to purchase additional capital stock as they increase their advances, borrowings or sell mortgage loans to the Bank, and it contracts when we repurchase excess capital stock from members as their advances or balances of mortgage loans sold todecline. In addition, the Bank decline.manages its retained earnings to ensure compliance with regulatory capital requirements in the event of significant growth in member business. As a result of these strategies, we have historically been able to achieve our mission by meeting member credit needs and maintaining our strong regulatory capital position while paying dividends (including dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock) and repurchasing and redeeming excess capital stock. Limitations on the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock may diminish the effectiveness of our business model and could adversely affect the value of membership from the perspective of a member.


14


Changes in the credit ratings on FHLBank System consolidated obligations may adversely affect the cost of consolidated obligations.

FHLBank System consolidated obligations are rated Aaa/P-1 with a stable outlook by Moody's Investors Service (Moody's) and AA+/A-1+ with a stable outlook by Standard & Poor's Rating Services (Standard & Poor's)S&P Global Ratings (S&P). Rating agencies may from time to time change a rating or issue negative reports. Because all of the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, negative developments at any FHLBank may affect these credit ratings or result in the issuance of a negative report regardless of our own financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because of the FHLBanks' GSE status, the credit ratings of the FHLBank System and the FHLBanks are generally constrained by the long-term sovereign credit rating of the United States, and any downgrade in that sovereign credit rating may result in a corresponding downgrade to the credit ratings of FHLBank System consolidated obligations. Any adverse rating change or negative report may adversely affect our cost of funds and the FHLBanks' ability to issue consolidated obligations on acceptable terms, which could also adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations or restrictlimit our ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Changes in federal fiscal and monetary policy could adversely affect our business or results of operations.

Our business and results of operations are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the federal government and its agencies, including the Federal Reserve Board, which regulates the supply of money and credit in the United States. The Federal Reserve Board's policies directly and indirectly influence the yield on interest-earning assets and the cost of interest-bearing liabilities, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We realize income primarily from the spread between interest earned on our outstanding advances and investments and interest paid on our consolidated obligations and other liabilities. Although we use various methods and procedures to monitor and manage our exposure to changes in interest rates, we may experience instances when our interest-bearing liabilities will be significantly more sensitive to changes in interest rates than our interest-earning assets, or vice versa. In either case, interest rate movements contrary to our position could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to fund advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock. Moreover, the impact of changes in interest rates on mortgage-related assets can be exacerbated by prepayment risks, which are the risk that the assets will be refinanced by the obligor in low interest rate environments and the risk that the assets will remain outstanding longer than expected at below-market yields when interest rates increase.


16



Our exposure to credit risk could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We assume secured and unsecured credit risk exposure associated with the risk that a borrower or counterparty could default, and we could suffer a loss if we were not able to fully recover amounts owed to us on a timely basis. In addition, we have exposure to credit risk because the market value of an obligation may decline as a result of deterioration in the creditworthiness of the obligor or the credit quality of a security instrument. We have a high concentration of credit risk exposure to financial institutions. CreditSignificant credit losses could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.


15


We depend on institutional counterparties to provide credit obligations that are critical to our business. Defaults by one or more of these institutional counterparties on their obligations to the Bank could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We face the risk that one or more of our institutional counterparties may fail to fulfill contractual obligations to us. The primary exposures to institutional counterparty risk are with derivativesderivative counterparties, mortgage servicers that service the loans we hold as collateral for advances, and third-party providers of supplemental or primary mortgage insurance for mortgage loans purchased under the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®) Program. A default by a counterparty could result in losses to the Bank if our credit exposure to the counterparty was under-collateralized or our credit obligations to the counterparty were over-collateralized, and could also adversely affect our ability to conduct our operations efficiently and at cost-effective rates, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance” and “MPF” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.)

We rely on derivativesderivative transactions to reduce our interest ratemarket risk and funding costs, and changes in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of our derivativesderivative counterparties or changes in the legislation or the regulations affecting how derivatives are transacted may adversely affect our ability to enter into derivativesderivative transactions on acceptable terms.

Our financial strategies are highly dependent on our ability to enter into derivativesderivative transactions on acceptable terms to reduce our interest ratemarket risk and funding costs. We currently have a long-term credit rating of Aaa with a stable outlook from Moody's and AA+ with a stable outlook from Standard & Poor's.S&P. All of our derivativesderivative counterparties or guarantors currently have investment grade long-term credit ratings from Moody's and Standard & Poor's.S&P. Rating agencies may from time to time change a rating or issue negative reports, or other factors may raise questions regarding the creditworthiness of a counterparty, which may adversely affect our ability to enter into derivativesderivative transactions with acceptable counterparties on satisfactory terms in the quantities necessary to manage our interest rate risk and funding costs effectively. Changes in legislation or regulations affecting how derivatives are transacted may also adversely affect our ability to enter into derivativesderivative transactions with acceptable counterparties on satisfactory terms. Any of these changes could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to make advances on acceptable terms, pay dividends, or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Insufficient collateral protection could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We require that all outstanding advances be fully collateralized. In addition, for mortgage loans that we purchase under the MPF Program, we require that the participating financial institutions fully collateralize the outstanding credit enhancement obligations not covered through the purchase of supplemental mortgage insurance. We evaluate the types of collateral pledged by borrowers and participating financial institutions and assign borrowing capacities to the collateral based on the risks associated with each type of collateral. If we have insufficient collateral before or after an event of payment default by the borrower, or we are unable to liquidate the collateral for the value we assigned to it in the event of a payment default by a borrower, we could experience a credit loss on advances, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

17



We may not be able to meet our obligations as they come due or meet the credit and liquidity needs of our members in a timely and cost-effective manner.

We seek to be in a position to meet our members' credit and liquidity needs and pay our obligations without maintaining excessive holdings of low-yielding liquid investments or having to incur unnecessarily high borrowing costs. In addition, we maintain a contingency liquidity plan designed to enable us to meet our obligations and the credit and liquidity needs of members in the event of operational disruptions or short-term disruptions in the capital markets. Our efforts to manage our liquidity position, including our contingency liquidity plan, may not enable us to

16


meet our obligations and the credit and liquidity needs of our members, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We face competition for advances and access to funding, which could adversely affect our business.

Our primary business is making advances to our members. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured, including investment banks, commercial banks, the Federal Reserve Banks, and, in certain circumstances, other FHLBanks. Our members may have access to alternative funding sources, including independent access to the national and global credit markets. These alternative funding sources may offer more favorable terms than we do on our advances, including more flexible credit or collateral standards. In addition, many of our competitors are not subject to the same regulations as the FHLBanks, which may enable those competitors to offer products and terms that we are not able to offer.

The FHLBanks also compete with the U.S. Treasury, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs, as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities, for funds raised through the issuance of unsecured debt in the national and global debt markets. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs or lower amounts of debt issued at the same cost. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to access funding, reduce the amount of funding available to us, or increase the cost of funding available to us. Any of these results could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Our efforts to make advances pricing attractive to our members may affect earnings.

A decision to lower advances prices to maintain or gain volume or increase the benefits to borrowing members could result in lower earnings, which could adversely affect the amount of dividends on our capital stock.

If the Bank’s activity stock requirement is below the Bank’s regulatory capital requirements, a significant increase in business growth may require the Bank to increase its activity stock requirement in the future.

An activity stock requirement that is below the Bank’s regulatory capital requirement requires the Bank to maintain a certain level of retained earnings for capital compliance and business growth. Depending on the level of the Bank’s retained earnings and business growth and the Bank’s capital management strategies, the Bank may be required to increase its activity stock requirement in the future.

We have a high concentration of advances and capital with five institutions and their affiliates, and a loss or change of business activities with any of these institutions could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We have a high concentration of advances and capital with five institutions and their affiliates. Two of the five institutions increased their borrowings from the Bank during 2014, while the remaining three institutions decreased their borrowings from the Bank during 2014. All of the institutions may prepay or repay advances as they come due. If no other advances or investments are made to replace the prepaid and repaid advances of these large institutions, it would result in a significant reduction of our total assets. The reduction in advances could result in a reduction of capital as the Bank repurchases the resulting excess capital stock, at the Bank’s discretion, or redeems the excess capital stock after the expiration of the relevant five-year redemption period. The reduction in assets and capital could reduce the Bank’s net income.


18



The timing and magnitude of the impact of a reduction in the amount of advances to these institutions would depend on a number of factors, including:
the amount and period of time over which the advances are prepaid or repaid,
the amount and timing of any corresponding decreases in activity-based capital stock,
the profitability of the advances,
the amount and profitability of our investments,
the extent to which consolidated obligations mature as the advances are prepaid or repaid, and
our ability to extinguish consolidated obligations or transfer them to other FHLBanks and the associated costs of extinguishing or transferring the consolidated obligations.

The prepayment or repayment of a large amount of advances could also affect our ability to pay dividends, the amount of any dividend we pay, or our ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock.Additional information regarding concentration risk is set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 8 – Advances – Credit and Concentration Risk.”


17


A material and prolonged decline in advances could adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

If members continue to experience high levels of liquidity, we could experience further decreases in members’ use of Bank advances. Also, nonmembers (including former members and member successors) are not eligible to borrow new advances from the Bank or renew existing advances as they mature. Although the Bank’s business model is designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and capital as our members’ credit needs change, a prolonged material decline in advances could affect our results of operations, financial condition, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Deteriorating and volatileVolatile market conditions increase the risk that our financial models will produce unreliable results.

We use market-based information as inputs to our financial models, which we use to inform our operational decisions and to derive estimates for use in our financial reporting processes. While we regularly adjust our models in view of changes inmodel inputs based on economic conditions and expectations are regularly evaluated and adjusted to changing conditions, sudden significant changes in these conditions may increase the risk that our models could produce unreliable results or estimates that vary widely or prove to be inaccurate.

We may become liable for all or a portion of the consolidated obligations for which other FHLBanks are the primary obligors.

As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), orand regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) to require any FHLBank to repay all or any portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor, whether or not the other FHLBank has defaulted in the payment of those obligations and even though the FHLBank making the repayment received none of the proceeds from the issuance of the obligations. The likelihood of triggering the Bank's joint and several liability obligation depends on many factors, including the financial condition and financial performance of the other FHLBanks. If we are required by the Finance Agency to repay the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor, our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock could be adversely affected.

If the Bank or any other FHLBank has not paid the principal or interest due on all consolidated obligations, we may not be able to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase any shares of our capital stock.

If the principal or interest due on any consolidated obligations has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, we may not be able to pay dividends on our capital stock or redeem or repurchase any shares of our capital stock. If another FHLBank defaults on its obligation to pay principal or interest on any consolidated obligations, the

19



regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks provide that the Finance Agency may allocate outstanding principal and interest payments among one or more of the remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis or any other basis the Finance Agency may determine. Our ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock could be affected not only by our own financial condition, but also by the financial condition of one or more of the other FHLBanks.

We are affected by federal laws and regulations, which could change or be applied in a manner detrimental to our operations.

The FHLBanks are GSEs, organized under the authority of and governed by the FHLBank Act, and, as such, are also governed by the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992 and other federal laws and regulations. Effective July 30, 2008, the Finance Agency, an independent agency in the executive branch

18


of the federal government, became the federal regulator of the FHLBanks, Fannie Mae, and Freddie Mac. From time to time, Congress has amended the FHLBank Act and adopted other legislation in ways that have significantly affected the FHLBanks and the manner in which the FHLBanks carry out their housing finance mission and business operations. New or modified legislation enacted by Congress or regulations or policies of the Finance Agency could have a negative effect on our ability to conduct business or on our cost of doing business. In addition, new or modified legislation or regulations governing our members may affect our ability to conduct business or our cost of doing business with our members. Because of the recent change in the leadership of the U.S. government administration, there are additional uncertainties in the legislative and regulatory environment as well.

Changes in statutory or regulatory requirements or policies or in their application could result in changes in, among other things, the FHLBanks' cost of funds, retained earnings and capital requirements, accounting policies, liquidity management, debt issuance, dividend payment limits, form of dividend payments, capital redemption and repurchase limits, permissible business activities, and the size, scope, and nature of the FHLBanks' lending, investment, and mortgage purchase program activities. These changes could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends, or ability to redeem or repurchase capital stock. In addition, given the Bank's relationship with other FHLBanks, we could be affected by events other than another FHLBank's default on a consolidated obligation. Events that affect other FHLBanks, such as member failures or capital deficiencies and OTTI charges,at another FHLBank, could lead the Finance Agency to require or request that an FHLBank provide capital or other assistance to another FHLBank, purchase assets from another FHLBank, or impose other forms of resolution affecting one or more of the other FHLBanks. If the Bank were called upon by the Finance Agency to take any of these steps, it could affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We could change our policies, programs, and agreements affecting our members.

We may change our policies, programs, and agreements affecting our members from time to time, including, without limitation, policies, programs, and agreements affecting the availability of and conditions for access to our advances and other credit products, the Affordable Housing Program (AHP), dividends, the repurchase of capital stock, and other programs, products, and services. These changes could cause our members to obtain financing from alternative sources, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock. In addition, changes to our policies, programs, and agreements affecting our members could adversely affect the value of membership from the perspective of a member.

The failure of the FHLBanks to set aside, in the aggregate, at least $100 million annually for the AHP could result in an increase in our AHP contribution, which could adversely affect our results of operations or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP. Annually, the FHLBanks are required to set aside, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 million or 10% of their current year's net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for the AHP) for their AHPs. If the FHLBanks do not make the minimum $100 million annual AHP contribution in a given year, we could be required to contribute more than 10% of our current year’s net earnings to the AHP. An increase in our

20



AHP contribution could adversely affect our results of operations or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Our members are governed by federal and state laws and regulations, which could change in a manner detrimental to their ability or motivation to invest in the Bank or to use our products and services.

Most of our members are highly regulated financial institutions, and the regulatory environment affecting members could change in a manner that would negatively affect their ability or motivation to acquire or own our capital stock or use our products and services. Statutory or regulatory changes that make it less attractive to hold our capital stock or use our products and services could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.


19


Changes in the status, regulation, and perception of the housing GSEs or in policies and programs relating to the housing GSEs may adversely affect our business activities, future advances balances, the cost of debt issuance, or future dividend payments.

Changes in the status of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the next phases of their conservatorships and the continued support of the Senior Preferred Stock Purchase Agreements with the U.S. Treasury may result in higher funding costs for the FHLBanks, which could negatively affect our business and financial condition. In addition, negative news articles, industry reports, and other announcements pertaining to GSEs, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and any of the FHLBanks, could create pressure on all GSE debt pricing, as investors may perceive their debt instruments as bearing increased risk.

As a result of these factors, the FHLBank System may have to pay higher spreads relative to Treasury yieldsrates on consolidated obligations to make them attractive to investors. If we maintain our existingcurrent approach to pricing on advances, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could reduce our net interest spread (the difference between the interest rate received on advances and the interest rate paid on consolidated obligations) and cause our advances to be less profitable. If we increase the price of our advances to avoid a decrease in the net interest spread, the advances may no longer be less attractive to our members, and our outstanding advances balances may decrease. In addition, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could reduce our net interest spread on other interest-earning assets. As a result, an increase in the cost of issuing consolidated obligations could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We rely heavily on information systems and other technology. A failure, interruption, or security breach, including events caused by cyber attacks, of our information systems or those of critical vendors and third parties could disrupt the Bank’s business or adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, or reputation.

We rely heavily on our information systems and other technology to conduct and manage our business, and we rely on vendors and other third parties to perform certain critical services. If we or one of our critical vendors experiences a failure, interruption, or security breach in any information systems or other technology, including events caused by cyber attacks, we may be unable to conduct and manage our business effectively. In addition, such failure or breach could result in significant losses, including a loss of personal and confidential information, or reputational damage. In the event of a breach resulting in loss of data, such as personally identifiable information or other such data protected by data privacy or other laws, we may be liable for damages, fines, and penalties for such losses under applicable regulatory frameworks despite not being able to limit our liability or damages in the event of such a loss. In addition, significant initiatives undertaken by the Bank to replace information systems or other technology infrastructures may subject the Bank to a similartemporary risk of failure or interruption while the Bank is in the process of implementing these new systems or technology infrastructures. Although we have implemented a business continuity plan, we may not be able to prevent, timely and adequately address, or mitigate the negative effects of any failure or interruption. Any failure or interruption could adversely affect our advancesmember business, member relations, risk management, reputation, or profitability, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.


21



Restrictions on the redemption, repurchase, or transfer of the Bank's capital stock could result in an illiquid investment forsignificantly reduce the holder.liquidity of our shareholders’ capital stock investment.

Under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, Finance Agency regulations, and our capital plan, our capital stock must be redeemed upon the expiration of the relevant five-year redemption period, subject to certain conditions. Capital stock may become subject to redemption following a five-year redemption period after a member provides a written redemption notice to the Bank; gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member's Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity. Only capital stock that is not required to meet a member'sthe membership capital stock requirement of a member or nonmember shareholder or to support a member or nonmember shareholder's outstanding activity with the Bank (excess capital stock) may be redeemed at the end of the redemption period. In addition, we may elect to repurchase some or all of the excess capital stock of a shareholder at any time at our sole discretion.


20


There is no guarantee, however, that we will be able to redeem capital stock held by a shareholder even at the end of the redemption period or to repurchase excess capital stock. If the redemption or repurchase of the capital stock would cause us to fail to meet our minimum regulatory capital requirements or cause the shareholder to fail to maintain its minimum investment requirement, then the redemption or repurchase is prohibited by Finance Agency regulations and our capital plan. In addition, since our capital stock may only be owned by our members (or, under certain circumstances, former members and certain successor institutions), and our capital plan requires our approval before a member or nonmember shareholder may transfer any of its capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder, we cannot provide assurance that a member or nonmember shareholder would be allowed to transfer any excess capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder at any time.

Changes to and replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate could adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

In July 2017, the United Kingdom's Financial Conduct Authority (FCA), a regulator of financial services firms and financial markets in the U.K., stated that they will plan for a phase out of regulatory oversight of LIBOR interest rate indices. The FCA has indicated they will support the LIBOR indices through 2021 to allow for an orderly transition to an alternative reference rate. Other financial services regulators and industry groups, including the International Swaps and Derivatives Association and the Alternative Reference Rates Committee, are evaluating the possible phase-out of LIBOR and the development of alternate interest rate indices or reference rates, such as the Secured Overnight Financing Rate. Many of the Bank's assets and liabilities are indexed to LIBOR. Given the large volume of LIBOR-based mortgages and financial instruments, the basis adjustment to the replacement floating rate will receive extraordinary scrutiny, but whether the net impact is positive or negative cannot yet be ascertained. The infrastructure necessary to manage hedging in the alternative reference rate still needs to be built out, and the transition in the markets, and adjustments in Bank systems, could be disruptive.

ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.

ITEM 2.PROPERTIES

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) maintains its principal offices in leased premises totaling 108,147109,008 square feet of space at 600 California Street in San Francisco, California, and 580 California Street in San Francisco, California. The Bank also leases other offices totaling 9,3469,858 square feet of space at 1155 15th Street NW in Washington, D.C., as well as off-site business continuity facilities located in Rancho Cordova, California. The Bank believes these facilities are adequate for the purposes for which they are currently used and are well maintained.

22



ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) may be subject to various legal proceedings arising in the ordinarynormal course of business.

In 2010, the Bank filed two complaints in the Superior Court of the State of California, County of San Francisco (San Francisco Superior Court), relating to the purchase of private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS). The Bank seekssought rescission and assertsasserted claims for and violations of the California Corporate Securities Act and common law rescission of contract.

In January 2015,2017, the Bank entered into a settlement agreement with a defendant for an amount of $119 million (after netting certain legal fees and expenses). The Bank has settled or entered into settlement agreements with certainall the defendants in connection with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation for the aggregate amount of $459 million (after netting certain legal fees and expenses) and, with respect to certain claims, an additional amount to be received by the Bank in the future. The Bank’s litigation continues against various dealers and underwriters.

The current defendants in the first complaint are: J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc. (formerly known as Bear, Stearns & Co. Inc., and referred to as Bear Stearns) involving certificates sold by Bear Stearns to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $609 million; Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC (formerly known as Credit Suisse First Boston LLC, and referred to as Credit Suisse) involving certificates sold by Credit Suisse to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $1.1 billion; RBS Securities, Inc. (formerly known as Greenwich Capital Markets, Inc., and referred to as Greenwich Capital) involving certificates sold by Greenwich Capital to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $482 million; Morgan Stanley & Co. Incorporated (Morgan Stanley) involving certificates sold by Morgan Stanley to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $276 million; UBS Securities, LLC (UBS) involving certificates sold by UBS to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $1.7 billion; and WaMu Capital Corp. (WaMu) involving certificates sold by WaMu to the Bank in the amount paid of approximately $637 million.

The current defendants in the second complaint are: Credit Suisse involving certificates sold by Credit Suisse to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $664 million; Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. (Deutsche) involving certificates sold by Deutsche to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $1.2 billion; Bear Stearns involving certificates that Bear Stearns sold to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $1.9 billion; Greenwich Capital

21


involving certificates sold by Greenwich Capital to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $153 million; and UBS involving certificates sold by UBS to the Bank in an amount paid of approximately $770 million.

JPMorgan Bank and Trust Company, a member of the Bank, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, a nonmember borrower of the Bank, are not defendants in these actions, but are affiliated with the Bear Stearns and WaMu defendants.

A bellwether trial relating to a subset of the defendants and PLRMBS was scheduled to begin January 20, 2015, and all discovery concerning that trial was completed in 2014. Thereafter, all of the Bank’s claims in that trial were voluntarily dismissed by the Bank. Discovery as to the remaining claims is continuing. The San Francisco Superior Court has scheduled a series of trials for the remaining claims beginning in January 2016.litigation.

After consultation with legal counsel, the Bank is not aware of any other legal proceedings that are expected to have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations or that are otherwise material to the Bank.

ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.


22


PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) has a cooperative ownership structure. The members and certain nonmembers own all the capital stock of the Bank, the majority of the directors of the Bank are officers or directors of members, and the directors are elected by members (or selected by the Board of Directors to fill mid-term vacancies). There is no established marketplace for the Bank's capital stock. The Bank’s capital stock is not publicly traded. The Bank issues only one class of capital stock, Class B stock, which, under the Bank’s capital plan, may be redeemed at par value, $100 per share, upon five years’ notice from the member to the Bank, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the satisfaction of any ongoing capital stock investment requirements applying to the member.

At the Bank’s discretion and at any time, the Bank may repurchase shares held by a member in excess of the member’s required capital stock holdings. The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) summarizes the Bank’s capital management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices with respect to restricted retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock. In January 2017, the Framework was amended and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors to include the Bank’s dividend philosophy to endeavor to pay a quarterly dividend at an annualized rate between 5% and 7%. The decision to declare any dividend and the dividend rate are at the discretion of the Bank’s Board of Directors, which may choose to follow the dividend philosophy as guidance in the dividend declaration. The Bank’s historical dividend rates and the dividend philosophy are not indicative of future dividend declarations. The Bank’s dividend policy may be revised or eliminated in the future and there can be no assurance as to future dividends. For information on the Bank’s policies and practices with respect to dividend payments, see “Part I. Financial Information, Item 1. Business – Capital – Dividends and Retained Earnings,” which is herein incorporated by reference.

The information regarding the Bank’s capital requirements is set forth in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital.” At February 28, 2015,2018, the Bank had 33,057,22034,245,255 shares of Class B stock held by 345334 members and 7,163,2023,095,175 shares of Class B stock held by 317 nonmembers. Class B stock held by nonmembers is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.


23



Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) rules state that FHLBanks may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings, and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. In addition, Finance Agency rules do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if its excess capital stock exceeds 1% of its total assets. Excess capital stock is defined as the aggregate of the capital stock held by each shareholder in excess of its minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan.

There is no requirement that the Board of Directors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Board of Directors to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the Federal Home Loan Bank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

The Bank’s dividend rates declared (annualized) and amounts paid during the respective periods indicated are listed in the table below.below; the rates and amounts are not indicative of dividends to be paid in the future.

2014 20132017 2016
Amount of Cash Dividends   Amount of Cash Dividends  Amount of Cash Dividends   Amount of Cash Dividends  
(Dollars in millions)
Capital Stock –
Class B – Putable

 
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital Stock

 
Annualized Rate(1)

 Capital Stock –
Class B – Putable

 
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital Stock

 
Annualized Rate(1)

Capital Stock –
Class B – Putable

 
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital Stock

 
Annualized Rate(1)

 Capital Stock –
Class B – Putable

 
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital Stock

 
Annualized Rate(1)

First quarter$58
 $39
 6.67% $25
 $26
 2.30%$54
 $11
 9.08% $45
 $10
 7.99%
Second quarter59
 34
 6.80
 35
 36
 3.38
41
 7
 7.00
 49
 12
 8.90
Third quarter61
 26
 7.35
 49
 47
 5.14
44
 7
 7.00
 52
 11
 9.17
Fourth quarter(2)62
 21
 7.40
 52
 46
 5.65
48
 7
 7.00
 138
 27
 22.51

(1)Reflects the annualized rate paid on all of the Bank's average capital stock outstanding regardless of its classification for reporting purposes as either capital stock or mandatorily redeemable capital stock (a liability), based on the par value of $100 per share.
(2)In the fourth quarter of 2016, the amount includes a special dividend at an annualized rate of 13.57%, totaling $100 million, including $83 million in dividends on capital stock and $17 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Additional information regarding the Bank’s dividends is set forth in “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Comparison of 2014 to 2013 – Dividends and Retained Earnings”1. Business” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital.”



2324



ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following selected financial data of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto and “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere herein.

(Dollars in millions)2014
 2013
 2012
 2011
 2010
2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Selected Balance Sheet Items at Yearend         
Selected Statement of Condition Data at Yearend         
Total Assets$75,807
 $85,774
 $86,421
 $113,552
 $152,423
$123,385
 $91,941
 $85,698
 $75,807
 $85,774
Advances38,986
 44,395
 43,750
 68,164
 95,599
77,382
 49,845
 50,919
 38,986
 44,395
Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio, Net708
 905
 1,289
 1,829
 2,381
2,076
 826
 655
 708
 905
Investments(1)
31,949
 35,260
 40,528
 39,368
 52,582
43,570
 40,986
 32,275
 31,949
 35,260
Consolidated Obligations:(2)
                  
Bonds47,045
 53,207
 70,310
 83,350
 121,120
85,063
 50,224
 51,827
 47,045
 53,207
Discount Notes21,811
 24,194
 5,209
 19,152
 19,527
30,440
 33,506
 27,647
 21,811
 24,194
Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock719
 2,071
 4,343
 5,578
 3,749
309
 457
 488
 719
 2,071
Capital Stock —Class B —Putable3,278
 3,460
 4,160
 4,795
 8,282
3,243
 2,370
 2,253
 3,278
 3,460
Unrestricted Retained Earnings294
 317
 246
 
 
2,670
 888
 610
 294
 317
Restricted Retained Earnings2,065
 2,077
 2,001
 1,803
 1,609
575
 2,168
 2,018
 2,065
 2,077
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss) (AOCI)56
 (145) (794) (1,893) (2,943)318
 111
 15
 56
 (145)
Total Capital5,693
 5,709
 5,613
 4,705
 6,948
6,806
 5,537
 4,896
 5,693
 5,709
Selected Operating Results for the Year                  
Net Interest Income$539
 $482
 $848
 $1,033
 $1,296
$567
 $471
 $477
 $539
 $482
Provision for/(Reversal of) Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans
 (1) (1) 4
 2

 
 1
 
 (1)
Other Income/(Loss)(154) 5
 (164) (645) (604)78
 485
 388
 (154) 5
Other Expense144
 128
 134
 126
 145
224
 158
 148
 144
 128
Assessments36
 52
 60
 42
 146
45
 86
 78
 36
 52
Net Income/(Loss)$205
 $308
 $491
 $216
 $399
$376
 $712
 $638
 $205
 $308
Selected Other Data for the Year                  
Net Interest Margin(3)
0.64% 0.56% 0.84% 0.74% 0.79%0.55% 0.52% 0.57% 0.64% 0.56%
Operating Expenses as a Percent of Average Assets0.16
 0.13
 0.11
 0.08
 0.07
0.14
 0.16
 0.16
 0.16
 0.13
Return on Average Assets0.24
 0.35
 0.48
 0.15
 0.24
0.36
 0.77
 0.76
 0.24
 0.35
Return on Average Equity3.58
 5.36
 9.44
 3.43
 6.13
6.21
 13.63
 11.68
 3.58
 5.36
Annualized Dividend Rate7.02
 3.99
 0.97
 0.29
 0.34
7.50
 12.33
 12.39
 7.02
 3.99
Dividend Payout Ratio(4)
117.29
 52.29
 9.41
 10.16
 7.31
49.59
 39.98
 57.81
 117.29
 52.29
Average Equity to Average Assets Ratio6.75
 6.55
 5.09
 4.49
 3.98
5.82
 5.68
 6.52
 6.75
 6.55
Selected Other Data at Yearend                  
Regulatory Capital Ratio(5)
8.38
 9.24
 12.44
 10.72
 8.95
5.51
 6.40
 6.26
 8.38
 9.24
Duration Gap (in months)
 1
 (1) 2
 1
1
 1
 1
 
 1

(1)
Investments consist of interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, trading securities, available-for-sale securities, and held-to-maturity securities, and loans to other Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks).securities.
(2)
As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended, or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all of the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The Bank has never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 20142017, and through the filing date of this report, does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so. The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of theall FHLBanks at the dates indicated was as follows:


2425


Table of Contents

Yearend
Par Value
(In millions)

Par Value
(In millions)

2017$1,034,260
2016989,311
2015905,202
2014$847,175
847,175
2013766,837
766,837
2012687,902
2011691,868
2010796,374

(3)Net interest margin is net interest income divided by average interest-earning assets.
(4)This ratio is calculated as dividends per share divided by net income per share.
(5)This ratio is calculated as regulatory capital divided by total assets. Regulatory capital includes retained earnings, Class B capital stock, and mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability), but excludes AOCI.


25

Table of Contents

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Statements contained in this annual report on Form 10-K, including statements describing the objectives, projections, estimates, or predictions of the future of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) or the Federal Home Loan Bank System (FHLBank System), are “forward-looking statements.” These statements may use forward-looking terms, such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “intend,” “likely,” “may,” “probable,” “project,” “should,” “will,” or their negatives or other variations on these terms, and include statements related to, among others, gains and losses on derivatives, plans to pay dividends and repurchase excess capital stock, future other-than-temporary impairment losses, future classification of securities, and reform legislation. The Bank cautions that by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk or uncertainty that could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a particular objective, projection, estimate, or prediction is realized. These risks and uncertainties include, among others, the following:
changes in economic and market conditions, including conditions in the mortgage, housing, and capital markets;
the volatility of market prices, rates, and indices;
the timing and volume of market activity;
political events, including legislative, regulatory, judicial, or other developments that affect the Bank, its members, counterparties, or investors in the consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks), such as the impact of any government-sponsored enterprises (GSE) legislative reforms, changes in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), changes in applicable sections of the Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, or changes in other statutes or regulations applicable to the FHLBanks;
changes in the Bank’s capital structure;structure and composition;
the ability of the Bank to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
membership changes, including changes resulting from mergers or changes in the principal place of business of Bank members;
the soundness of other financial institutions, including Bank members, nonmember borrowers, other counterparties, and the other FHLBanks;
changes in Bank members’ demand for Bank advances;
changes in the value or liquidity of collateral underlying advances to Bank members or nonmember borrowers or collateral pledged by the Bank’s derivative counterparties;
changes in the fair value and economic value of, impairments of, and risks associated with the Bank’s investments in mortgage loans and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) or other assets and the related credit enhancement protections;
changes in the Bank’s ability or intent to hold MBS and mortgage loans to maturity;
competitive forces, including the availability of other sources of funding for Bank members;
the willingness of the Bank’s members to do business with the Bank;
changes in investor demand for consolidated obligations (including the terms of consolidated obligations) and/or the terms of interest rate exchange or similar agreements;

26


Table of Contents

the impact of any changes and developments in FHLBank System-wide debt issuance and governance practices;
the ability of each of the other FHLBanks to repay the principal and interest on consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor and with respect to which the Bank has joint and several liability;
designation of thechanges in key Bank for Federal Reserve Board supervision by the Financial Stability Oversight Council;personnel;
technology changes and enhancements, and the Bank’s ability to develop and support technology and information systems sufficient to manage the risks of the Bank’s business effectively; and
changes in the FHLBanks’ long-term credit ratings.

Readers of this report should not rely solely on the forward-looking statements and should consider all risks and uncertainties addressed throughout this report, as well as those discussed under “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”Factors”.


26

Table of Contents

Overview

The Federal Home Loan Bank serves eligible financial institutions in Arizona, California and Nevada, the three states that make up the Eleventh District of San Francisco’s netthe FHLBank System. The Bank’s primary business is providing competitively priced, collateralized loans, known as advances, to its member institutions and certain qualifying housing associates. The Bank's principal source of funds is debt issued in the capital markets. All 11 FHLBanks issue debt in the form of consolidated obligations through the Office of Finance as their agent, and all 11 FHLBanks are jointly and severally liable for the repayment of all consolidated obligations.

The Bank experienced strong earnings in 2017. Net income for 2014the year was $205$376 million, compared with net income of $308$712 million for 2013.2016. The $103$336 million decrease in net income primarily reflected a $391 million decrease in othergains on settlements relating to the Bank's private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS) litigation. The decrease in net income partiallyalso reflected voluntary charitable contributions of $60 million made by the Bank during 2017 for the Quality Jobs Fund, a donor-advised fund established to support quality job growth and small business expansion, as well as voluntary contributions of $7 million to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) to offset by anthe impact on the AHP assessment of the expense related to the charitable contributions.

The $96 million increase in net interest income.income for 2017 relative to the prior year reflected higher average balances of interest-earning assets, combined with higher spreads on those assets, and lower dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock, which are classified as interest expense.

Net interest income for 2014 was $539 million, up from $482 million for 2013. The increase was primarily dueRetained earnings grew to improved spreads on interest-earning assets, including the accretion of yield adjustments on certain other-than-temporarily impaired private-label residential MBS (PLRMBS) resulting from improvement in expected cash flows, partially offset by a decrease in earnings on invested capital because of lower average capital balances and the lower interest rate environment.

Other income/(loss) for 2014 was loss of $154 million, compared with income of $5 million for 2013. The change reflected net fair value losses associated with derivatives, hedged items, and financial instruments carried at fair value of $94 million (compared with net fair value losses of $29 million for 2013), which were due to the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors during the period. The change also reflected expense on derivative instruments used in economic hedges of $64 million (compared with income of $34 million for 2013). Income/expense on derivative instruments used in economic hedges is generally offset by interest expense/income on the economically hedged assets and liabilities.

During 2014, total assets decreased $10.0 billion, to $75.8$3.2 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $85.8$3.1 billion at December 31, 2013. Advances decreased$5.42016, and the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 7.50%, totaling $219 million, including $187 million in dividends on capital stock and $32 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock during 2017.

During 2017, total assets increased $31.5 billion,, or 12%, to $39.0$123.4 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $44.4$91.9 billion at December 31, 2013. In total, 83 members2016, primarily reflecting an increase in period end advance balances, which increased their use of advances during 2014, while 68 institutions reduced their advances borrowings.to $77.4 billion at December 31, 2017, from $49.8 billion at December 31, 2016. In addition, investments decreased $3.3increased $2.6 billion, or 9%, to $32.0$43.6 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $35.3$41.0 billion at December 31, 2013,2016, primarily as a result of principal repayments on the Bank’s MBS portfolio.reflecting an increase in Federal funds sold.

Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss)income increased by $201$207 million during 2014,2017, to income of $56$318 million at December 31, 2014,2017, from a loss of $145 million $111 million at December 31, 2013,2016, primarily as a result of improvement in the fair value of PLRMBS classified as available-for-sale (AFS).available-for-sale.

Additional information about investments and other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) losses associated with the Bank’s PLRMBS is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.” Additional information about the Bank’s PLRMBS is also provided in “Part I. Item 3. Legal Proceedings.”

On February 19, 2015,21, 2018, the Bank’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on the capital stock outstanding during the fourth quarter of 20142017 at an annualized rate of 7.11%7.00%. The dividend will total $74$59 million, including $15$6 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock that will be reflected as interest expense in the first quarter of 2015.2018. The Bank recorded the dividend on February 19, 2015, the day it was declared by the Board of Directors. The Bank21, 2018, and expects to pay the dividend on or about March 19, 2015.15, 2018.


27


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank was in compliance with all of its regulatory capital requirements. The Bank’s total regulatory capital ratio was 8.4%5.5%, exceeding the 4.0% requirement. The Bank had $6.4$6.8 billion in permanent capital, exceeding its risk-based capital requirement of $3.2 billion. Total retained earnings as of December 31, 2014, were $2.4$2.0 billion.

As of December 31, 2014, the Bank’s excess capital stock totaled $1.1 billion. The Bank plans to repurchase $750 million inthe surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on March 20, 2015. This repurchase, combined with the estimated redemption of up to $5 million in mandatorily redeemable16, 2018. Surplus capital stock during the first quarteris defined as any stock holdings in excess of 2015, will reduce the Bank’s excess115% of a member’s minimum capital stock by up to $755 million.requirement.


27

Table of Contents

The Bank will continue to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of the Bank’stotal capital to the par value of the Bank’s capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock in future quarters.

Hurricanes Harvey and Irma. During 2017, two significant hurricanes struck the southeastern coast of the United States. On August 25, 2017, Hurricane Harvey made landfall near Corpus Christi, Texas, causing substantial damage and flooding to southeastern Texas, including the Houston metropolitan area. On September 10, 2017, Hurricane Irma made landfall on the Florida mainland near Marco Island, Florida. Hurricane Irma then moved northward through Florida and into Georgia, causing significant damage to property in Florida, Georgia, and certain other southeastern states.
The Bank has analyzed the potential impact that damage related to Hurricanes Irma and Harvey might have on the Bank’s advances, letters of credit, mortgage loans, and PLRMBS securities. Based on the information currently available, the Bank does not expect that the potential losses resulting from the hurricanes will have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition or results of operations. The Bank continues to evaluate the impact of the hurricanes on its mortgage loans held for portfolio and PLRMBS investments. If additional information becomes available indicating that any of these assets have been impaired and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated, the Bank will record appropriate reserves at that time. 

Results of Operations

Comparison of 20142017 and 20132016

Net Interest Income. The primary source of the Bank’s earnings is net interest income, which is the interest earned on advances, mortgage loans, and investments,investments. This includes net accretion of related income, which is a result of improvement in expected cash flows on certain other-than-temporarily-impaired PLRMBS, less interest paid on consolidated obligations, deposits, mandatorily redeemable capital stock, and other borrowings. The Average Balance Sheets tabletables that follows presentsfollow present the average balances of interest-earning asset categories and the sources that funded those interest-earning assets (liabilities and capital) for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, together with the related interest income and expense. ItThey also presentspresent the average rates on total interest-earning assets and the average costs of total funding sources.


28


Table of Contents

Average Balance Sheets
                      
2014 20132017 2016
(Dollars in millions)
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

Assets                      
Interest-earning assets:                      
Interest-bearing deposits$325
 $
 0.01% $54
 $
 0.04%$727
 $8
 1.05% $603
 $2
 0.38%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,436
 1
 0.06
 1,315
 1
 0.10
1,008
 9
 0.93
 3,120
 12
 0.37
Federal funds sold9,602
 11
 0.12
 10,146
 15
 0.15
10,871
 115
 1.06
 7,010
 29
 0.41
Trading securities:                      
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS)12
 
 1.63
 14
 
 1.66
7
 
 2.24
 9
 
 1.91
Other investments3,432
 6
 0.18
 3,284
 7
 0.21
1,338
 17
 1.23
 1,537
 10
 0.61
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities:(1)
                      
MBS(2)
6,700
 278
 4.15
 7,692
 276
 3.59
3,890
 239
 6.14
 4,839
 262
 5.42
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities:(1)
                      
MBS14,338
 358
 2.49
 14,818
 386
 2.60
12,679
 274
 2.16
 10,756
 247
 2.30
Other investments2,111
 4
 0.20
 2,462
 6
 0.22
915
 11
 1.22
 466
 4
 0.90
Mortgage loans held for portfolio806
 42
 5.16
 1,080
 50
 4.63
1,402
 52
 3.74
 662
 30
 4.50
Advances(3)
45,104
 305
 0.68
 45,854
 345
 0.75
70,169
 875
 1.25
 62,168
 482
 0.78
Loans to other FHLBanks3
 
 0.07
 8
 
 0.07
7
 
 1.11
 3
 
 0.40
Total interest-earning assets83,869
 1,005
 1.20
 86,727
 1,086
 1.25
103,013
 1,600
 1.55
 91,173
 1,078
 1.18
Other assets(4)(5)
929
 
 
 1,050
 
 
964
 
   768
 
  
Total Assets$84,798
 $1,005
 1.19% $87,777
 $1,086
 1.24%$103,977
 $1,600
   $91,941
 $1,078
  
Liabilities and Capital                      
Interest-bearing liabilities:                      
Consolidated obligations:                      
Bonds(3)
$52,805
 $326
 0.62% $60,913
 $432
 0.71%$62,905
 $713
 1.13% $51,606
 $410
 0.79%
Discount notes23,582
 20
 0.09
 16,325
 17
 0.10
33,657
 285
 0.85
 33,504
 136
 0.41
Deposits and other borrowings835
 
 0.05
 288
 
 0.13
258
 3
 0.96
 342
 1
 0.19
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock1,348
 120
 8.88
 3,376
 155
 4.59
387
 32
 8.30
 494
 60
 12.25
Borrowings from other FHLBanks8
 
 0.57
 13
 
 0.46
Total interest-bearing liabilities78,570
 466
 0.59
 80,902
 604
 0.75
97,215
 1,033
 1.06
 85,959
 607
 0.71
Other liabilities(4)
501
 
 
 1,122
 
 
709
 
   756
 
  
Total Liabilities79,071
 466
 0.59
 82,024
 604
 0.74
97,924
 1,033
   86,715
 607
  
Total Capital5,727
 
 
 5,753
 
 
6,053
 
   5,226
 
  
Total Liabilities and Capital$84,798
 $466
 0.55% $87,777
 $604
 0.69%$103,977
 $1,033
   $91,941
 $607
  
Net Interest Income  $539
     $482
    $567
     $471
  
Net Interest Spread(6)
    0.61%     0.50%    0.49%     0.47%
Net Interest Margin(7)
    0.64%     0.56%    0.55%     0.52%
Interest-earning Assets/Interest-bearing Liabilities106.74%     107.20%    105.96%     106.07%    

(1)The average balances of AFS securities and HTM securities are reflected at amortized cost. As a result, the average rates do not reflect changes in fair value or non-credit-related OTTI losses.
(2)Interest income on AFS securities includes accretion of yield adjustments on other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (resulting from improvement in expected cash flows) totaling $68$69 million and $26$81 million in 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.
(3)Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements, as follows:





29


Table of Contents

2014 20132017 2016
(In millions)
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

 
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

 
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

Advances$(4) $(128) $(132) $(7) $(126) $(133)$1
 $(27) $(26) $(1) $(55) $(56)
Consolidated obligation bonds5
 260
 265
 47
 366
 413
(1) 27
 26
 4
 180
 184

(4)Includes forward settling transactions and valuation adjustments for certain cash items.
(5)Includes non-credit-related OTTI losses on AFS and HTM securities.
(6)Net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)Net interest margin is net interest income (annualized) divided by average interest-earning assets.

Net interest income in 20142017 was $539$567 million, a 12%20% increase from $482$471 million in 2013.2016. The following table details the changes in interest income and interest expense for 20142017 compared to 2013.2016. Changes in both volume and interest rates influence changes in net interest income, net interest spread, and net interest margin.

Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2014 Compared to 2013
Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2017 Compared to 2016
Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2017 Compared to 2016
          
Increase/
(Decrease)

 
Attributable to Changes in(1)
Increase/
(Decrease)

 
Attributable to Changes in(1)
(In millions) Average Volume
 Average Rate
 Average Volume
 Average Rate
Interest-earning assets:          
Interest-bearing deposits$6
 $1
 $5
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(3) (12) 9
Federal funds sold(4) (1) (3)86
 22
 64
Trading securities: Other investments(1) 
 (1)7
 (1) 8
AFS securities:          
MBS2
 (38) 40
(23) (55) 32
HTM securities:          
MBS(28) (12) (16)27
 42
 (15)
Other investments(2) (1) (1)7
 5
 2
Mortgage loans held for portfolio(8) (13) 5
22
 28
 (6)
Advances(2)
(40) (6) (34)393
 69
 324
Total interest-earning assets(81) (71) (10)522
 99
 423
Interest-bearing liabilities:          
Consolidated obligations:          
Bonds(2)
(106) (54) (52)303
 103
 200
Discount notes3
 6
 (3)149
 1
 148
Deposits and other borrowings2
 
 2
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock(35) (127) 92
(28) (11) (17)
Total interest-bearing liabilities(138) (175) 37
426
 93
 333
Net interest income$57
 $104
 $(47)$96
 $6
 $90

(1)Combined rate/volume variances, a third element of the calculation, are allocated to the rate and volume variances based on their relative sizes.
(2)Interest income/expense and average rates include the interest effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements.

Net interest income included $6 million of advance prepayment fees in 2014 compared to $5 million in 2013.

The net interest margin was 6455 basis points for 2014, 82017, 3 basis points higher than the net interest margin for 2013,2016, which was 5652 basis points. The net interest spread was 6149 basis points for 2014, 112017, 2 basis points higher than the net interest spread for 2013,2016, which was 5047 basis points. These increases were primarily due to improvedhigher average balances of interest-earning assets, combined with higher spreads on interest-earning assets, including the accretion of yield adjustments on certain other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS resulting from improvement in expected cash flows, partially offset by a decrease in earnings on invested capital because of lower average capital balances and the lower interest rate environment.those assets.


30

Table of Contents

For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank updates its estimate of future estimated cash flows on a regular basis. If there is no additional impairment on the security, the yield of the securityany improvement in expected cash flows is adjusted upward on a prospective basis and accreted into interest income when there isincome. As a significant increase in the expected cash flows. If there continue to beresult of improvements in the estimated cash flows of

30


Table of Contents

securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the accretion of yield adjustments is likely to continue to be a positive source of net interest income in future periods. (See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Fair Values – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment for Investment Securities” for further information.)

Member demand for wholesale funding from the Bank can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, including economic and market conditions, competition from other wholesale funding sources, member deposit inflows and outflows, the activity level of the primary and secondary mortgage markets, and strategic decisions made by individual member institutions. As a result, Bank asset levels and operating results may vary significantly from period to period.

Other Income/(Loss). The following table presents the components of “Other Income/(Loss)” for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.
Other Income/(Loss)
    
(In millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Other Income/(Loss):      
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)
$(1) $2
Total OTTI loss(14) (14)$(10) $(26)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) AOCI10
 7
(6) 10
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(4) (7)(16) (16)
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)

 4
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(93) (23)(31) (40)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities(64) 26
(14) 9
Gains on litigation settlements, net119
 510
Other8
 7
20
 18
Total Other Income/(Loss)$(154) $5
$78
 $485

(1)The net gain/(loss) on trading securities that were economically hedged totaled $(1) million and $2 million in 2014 and 2013, respectively.
(1) The net gain/(loss) on trading securities that were economically hedged totaled $1 million and $1 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Loss, Credit-Related – Each quarter, the Bank updates its OTTI analysis to reflect current housing market conditions, changes in anticipated housing market conditions, observed and anticipated borrower behavior, and updated information on the loans supporting the Bank’s PLRMBS.

Additional information about the OTTI loss is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option – The following table presents the net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.
 
Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option
      
(In millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Advances$(11) $(169)$(31) $(27)
Consolidated obligation bonds(82) 146

 (13)
Total$(93) $(23)$(31) $(40)


31


Table of Contents

Under the fair value option, the Bank elected to carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. In general, transactions elected for the fair value option are in economic hedge relationships. Gains or losses on these transactions are generally offset by losses or gains on the derivatives that economically hedge these instruments.

The unrealized net fair value gains/(losses) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option were primarily driven by the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors relative to the actual terms on the advances and consolidated obligation bonds during the period.

Additional information about advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 19 – Fair Value.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities – Under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, the Bank is required to carry all of its derivative instruments on the balance sheetStatement of Condition at fair value. If derivatives meet the hedging criteria, including effectiveness measures, the carrying value of the underlying hedged instruments may also be adjusted to reflect changes in the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged so that some or all of the unrealized gain or loss recognized on the derivative is offset by a corresponding unrealized loss or gain on the underlying hedged instrument. The unrealized gain or loss on the “ineffective” portion of all hedges, which represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item or the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction, is recognized in current period earnings. In addition, certain derivatives are associated with assets or liabilities but do not qualify as fair value hedges under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These economic hedges are recorded on the balance sheetStatement of Condition at fair value with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings without any offsetting unrealized loss or gain from the associated asset or liability.

The following table shows the accounting classification of hedges and the categories of hedged items that contributed to the gains and losses on derivatives and hedged items that were recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities” in 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2014 Compared to 2013
Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2017 Compared to 2016
Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2017 Compared to 2016
                              
(In millions)2014 20132017 2016
Gain/(Loss) 

Income/
(Expense) on

   Gain/(Loss) 

Income/
(Expense) on

  Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

   Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

  
Hedged Item
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
 
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
 
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
Advances:                              
Elected for fair value option$
 $21
 $(100) $(79) $
 $156
 $(114) $42
$
 $33
 $(23) $10
 $
 $44
 $(43) $1
Not elected for fair value option
 5
 (7) (2) 3
 17
 (16) 4
(3) (6) 1
 (8) 1
 (9) 3
 (5)
Consolidated obligation bonds:        
 
 
                 
Elected for fair value option
 36
 59
 95
 
 (100) 66
 (34)
 
 3
 3
 
 (1) 13
 12
Not elected for fair value option(12) (24) 24
 (12) (5) (113) 120
 2
2
 (14) 8
 (4) (3) (18) 23
 2
Consolidated obligation discount notes:                              
Not elected for fair value option
 (12) (39) (51) 
 34
 (21) 13

 (5) (29) (34) 
 23
 (28) (5)
MBS:                              
Not elected for fair value option
 (15) 
 (15) 
 
 
 

 (5) 
 (5) 
 
 
 
Non-MBS investments:                              
Not elected for fair value option
 1
 (1) 
 
 
 (1) (1)
 
 
 
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Mortgage delivery commitment:               
Not elected for fair value option
 24
 
 24
 
 5
 
 5
Total$(12) $12
 $(64) $(64) $(2) $(6) $34
 $26
$(1) $27
 $(40) $(14) $(2) $43
 $(32) $9


32


Table of Contents

During 20142017, net losses on derivatives and hedging activities totaled $64$14 million compared to net gains of $26$9 million in 2013.2016. These amounts included expense of $64$40 million and incomeexpense of $34$32 million resulting from net

32

Table of Contents

settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges in 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Excluding the impact of income or expense from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges, the net gains or losses on fair value and economic hedges were primarily associated with the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors during the period.

The ongoing impact of these valuation adjustments on the Bank cannot be predicted and the effects of these valuation adjustments may lead to significant volatility in future earnings, including earnings available for dividends.

Additional information about derivatives and hedging activities is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

Gains on Litigation Settlements, Net – During 2017 and 2016,gains relating to settlements with certain defendants in connection with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation (after netting certain legal fees and expenses) totaled $119 million and $510 million, respectively.

Other Expense. Other expenses were $144$224 million in 20142017 compared to $128$158 million in 2013,2016, primarily reflecting higher operating expensesvoluntary charitable contributions for the Quality Jobs Fund in 20142017.

Quality Jobs Fund Expenseand Other In the first quarter of 2017, the Board of Directors approved an allocation of $100 million for the Quality Jobs Fund, a donor-advised fund established to support quality jobs growth and small business expansion to be funded by the Bank in incremental amounts over the next two year period. During 2017, the Bank made voluntary charitable contributions of $60 million for the Quality Jobs Fund, as well as voluntary contributions of $7 million to the Affordable Housing Program (AHP) to offset the impact on the AHP assessment of the charitable contribution expense.

Affordable Housing Program. The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an Affordable Housing Program (AHP).AHP. Each FHLBank’s AHP provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances.

To fund the AHP, the FHLBanks must set aside, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 million or 10% of the current year's net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for the AHP). To the extent that the aggregate 10% calculation is less than $100 million, the FHLBank Act requires that each FHLBank contribute such prorated sums as may be required to ensure that the aggregate contribution of the FHLBanks equals $100 million. The proration would be made on the basis of the income of the FHLBanks for the previous year. In the aggregate, the FHLBanks set aside $269 million, $293$384 million and $296$392 million for their AHPs in 2014, 2013,2017 and 2012,2016, respectively, and there was no AHP shortfall in any of those years.

The Bank’s total AHP assessments equaled $36$45 million in 2014,2017, compared to $52$86 million in 2013.2016. The decrease in the AHP assessments reflected lower earnings in 2014.2017.

Return on Average Equity.Return on average equity (ROE) was 3.58%6.21% in 2014,2017, compared to 5.36%13.63% in 2013.2016. The decrease primarily reflected the decrease inlower net income in 2014.2017, and the increase in average equity from $5.2 billion for 2016 to $6.1 billion for 2017.

Dividends and Retained Earnings.The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework summarizes the Bank’s capital risk management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices with respect to restricted retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock.

Under regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, dividends may be paid only out of current net earnings or previously retained earnings. As required by the regulations, the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework is reviewed at least annually by the Bank’s Board of Directors. The Board of Directors may amend the Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework from time to time. In accordance with the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework, the Bank retains certain amounts in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available for dividends in the current dividend period. The Bank may be restricted from paying dividends if it is not in compliance with any of its minimum capital requirements or if payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of its minimum capital requirements. In addition, the Bank may not pay dividends if any principal or interest due on any consolidated obligation has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, or, under certain circumstances, if the Bank fails to satisfy certain liquidity requirements under applicable regulations.

The regulatory liquidity requirements state that each FHLBank must: (i) maintain eligible high quality assets (advances with a maturity not exceeding five years, U.S. Treasury securities investments, and deposits in banks or trust companies) in an amount equal to or greater than the deposits received from members, and (ii) hold contingent

33

Table of Contents

liquidity in an amount sufficient to meet its liquidity needs for at least five business days without access to the consolidated obligations markets. At December 31, 2014, advances maturing within five years totaled $37.0 billion, significantly in excess of the $160 million of member deposits on that date. At December 31, 2013, advances maturing within five years totaled $42.2 billion, also significantly in excess of the $193 million of member deposits on that date. In addition, as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Bank’s estimated total sources of funds obtainable from liquidity investments, repurchase agreement borrowings collateralized by the Bank’s marketable securities, and advance repayments would have allowed the Bank to meet its liquidity needs for more than 90 days without access to the consolidated obligations markets, subject to certain conditions. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Risk Management – Liquidity Risk.”

The Bank’s Risk Management Policy limits the payment of dividends based on the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock. If this ratio at the end of any quarter is less than 100% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and if this ratio is less than 70%, the Bank would be restricted from paying a dividend. The ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock was 168% as of December 31, 2014. For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Risk Management – Market Risk.”

Retained Earnings Related to Valuation Adjustments – In accordance with the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework, the Bank retains in restricted retained earnings any cumulative net gains in earnings (net of applicable assessments) resulting from valuation adjustments.

In general, the Bank’s derivatives and hedged instruments, as well as certain assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value, are held to the maturity, call, or put date. For these financial instruments, net valuation gains or losses are primarily a matter of timing and will generally reverse through changes in future valuations and settlements of contractual interest cash flows over the remaining contractual terms to maturity, or by the exercised call or put dates. However, the Bank may have instances in which hedging relationships are terminated prior to maturity or prior to the call or put dates. Terminating the hedging relationship may result in a realized gain or loss. In addition, the Bank may have instances in which it may sell trading securities prior to maturity, which may also result in a realized gain or loss.

The purpose of retaining cumulative net gains in earnings resulting from valuation adjustments as restricted retained earnings is to provide sufficient retained earnings to offset future net losses that result from the reversal of cumulative net gains, so that potential dividend payouts in future periods are not necessarily affected by the reversals of these gains. Although restricting retained earnings in this way may preserve the Bank’s ability to pay dividends, the reversal of cumulative net gains in any given period may result in a net loss if the reversal exceeds net earnings before the impact of valuation adjustments for that period.

Retained earnings related to valuation adjustments totaled $35 million and $88 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Other Retained Earnings – Targeted Buildup – In addition to any cumulative net gains resulting from valuation adjustments, the Bank holds an additional amount in restricted retained earnings intended to protect paid-in capital from the effects of an extremely adverse credit event, an extremely adverse operations risk event, a cumulative net loss related to the Bank’s derivatives and associated hedged items and financial instruments carried at fair value, an extremely adverse change in the market value of the Bank’s capital, a significant amount of additional credit-related OTTI on PLRMBS, or some combination of these effects, especially in periods of extremely low net income resulting from an adverse interest rate environment.

The Board of Directors set the targeted amount of restricted retained earnings at $1.8 billion, and the Bank reached this target as of March 31, 2012. The Bank’s retained earnings target may be changed at any time. The Board of

34

Table of Contents

Directors periodically reviews the methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate. As of December 31, 2014, the amount of restricted retained earnings in the Bank's targeted buildup account was $1.8 billion.

Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement – In 2011, the FHLBanks entered into a Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended (JCE Agreement), intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank by allocating a portion of each FHLBank’s earnings to a separate retained earnings account at that FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, each FHLBank is required to allocate 20% of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of the account equals at least 1% of that FHLBank’s average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter. Under the JCE Agreement, these restricted retained earnings will not be available to pay dividends.

Retained earnings related to the JCE Agreement totaled $230 million and $189 million at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

Dividend Payments – Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) rules state that FHLBanks may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings, and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. There is no requirement that the Board of Directors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Board of Directors to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

In addition, Finance Agency rules do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if the Bank’s excess capital stock (defined as any capital stock holdings in excess of a shareholder’s minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan) exceeds 1% of its total assets. As of December 31, 2014, the Bank’s excess capital stock totaled $1.1 billion, or 1.5% of total assets.

In 20142017, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 7.02%7.50%, totaling $360$219 million, including $240$187 million in dividends on capital stock and $120$32 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. In 2013,2016, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 3.99%12.33%, totaling $316$344 million, including $161$284 million in dividends on capital stock and $155$60 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends paid in 2016 included four quarterly dividends and a special dividend in the amount of

33


Table of Contents

$100 million, including $83 million in dividends on capital stock and $17 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

The Bank paid these dividends in cash. Dividends on capital stock are recognized as dividends on the Statements of Capital Accounts, and dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock are recognized as interest expense on the Statements of Income.

On February 19, 2015,21, 2018, the Bank’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend on the capital stock outstanding during the fourth quarter of 20142017 at an annualized rate of 7.11%7.00% totaling $74$59 million, including $59$53 million in dividends on capital stock and $15$6 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The Bank recorded the quarterly dividend on February 19, 2015, the day it was declared by the Board of Directors.21, 2018. The Bank expects to pay the quarterly dividend on or about March 19, 2015.15, 2018. Dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock will be recognized as interest expense in the first quarter of 2015.2018.

The Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to be retained in restricted retained earnings, which are not made available in the current dividend period. Prior to July 2017, the Bank’s Framework had three categories of restricted retained earnings: Valuation Adjustments, Other (which represented a targeted amount), and the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE Agreement). Under the Framework, the Bank’s required amount of restricted retained earnings was determined using the Bank’s retained earnings methodology. As determined using the Bank’s methodology, from July 2015 to January 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,000, and from January 2017 to July 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,300.

In July 2017, the Bank’s Board of Directors approved the transfer of all amounts classified as restricted retained earnings, other than the amounts related to the JCE Agreement, to unrestricted retained earnings. As a conforming change related to the transfer, the Bank’s Board of Directors amended the Framework to eliminate two of the categories of restricted retained earnings (Valuation Adjustments and Other) and approved revisions to the Bank’s retained earnings methodology to provide for a required level of total retained earnings of $2,300 for loss protection, capital compliance, and business growth. In January 2018, the methodology was further revised to provide a required level of total retained earnings of $2,500. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the JCE Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings.

Retained earnings related to the JCE Agreement totaled $575 million and $500 million at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Additional restricted retained earnings totaled $1.7 billion at December 31, 2016. Total restricted retained earnings were $575 million and $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The Bank will continue to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of the Bank’stotal capital to the par value of the Bank’s capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends in future quarters.

For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.”

Comparison of 2013 to 20122016 and 2015

Net Interest Income. The Average Balance Sheets tabletables that follows presentsfollow present the average balances of interest-earning asset categories and the sources that funded those interest-earning assets (liabilities and capital) for the

35

Table of Contents

years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, together with the related interest income and expense. ItThey also presentspresent the average rates on total interest-earning assets and the average costs of total funding sources.

34


Table of Contents

Average Balance Sheets
                      
2013 20122016 2015
(Dollars in millions)
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

  
Average
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

  
Average
Rate

Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

 
Average
Balance

 
Interest
Income/
Expense

 
Average
Rate

Assets                        
Interest-earning assets:                        
Interest-bearing deposits$54
 $
 0.04% $12
 $
 0.12%$603
 $2
 0.38% $719
 $
 0.01%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,315
 1
 0.10
 2,805
 5
 0.17
3,120
 12
 0.37
 2,513
 3
 0.10
Federal funds sold10,146
 15
 0.15
 7,827
 12
 0.16
7,010
 29
 0.41
 6,847
 9
 0.13
Trading securities:                        
MBS14
 
 1.66
 17
 
 1.80
Mortgage-backed securities (MBS)9
 
 1.91
 10
 
 1.68
Other investments3,284
 7
 0.21
 3,270
 22
 0.66
1,537
 10
 0.61
 2,439
 5
 0.21
AFS securities:(1)
           
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities:(1)
           
MBS(2)
7,692
 276
 3.59
 8,912
 314
 3.52
4,839
 262
 5.42
 5,809
 264
 4.54
Other investments
 
 
 792
 3
 0.47
HTM securities:(1)
             
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities:(1)
           
MBS14,818
 386
 2.60
 15,680
 467
 2.97
10,756
 247
 2.30
 11,783
 292
 2.48
Other investments2,462
 6
 0.22
 3,916
 9
 0.24
466
 4
 0.90
 297
 1
 0.51
Mortgage loans held for portfolio1,080
 50
 4.63
 1,556
 77
 4.99
662
 30
 4.50
 675
 33
 4.91
Advances(3)
45,854
 345
 0.75
 56,767
 585
 1.03
62,168
 482
 0.78
 51,899
 299
 0.58
Loans to other FHLBanks8
 
 0.07
 3
 
 0.12
3
 
 0.40
 5
 
 0.11
Total interest-earning assets86,727
 1,086
  1.25
 101,557
 1,494
  1.47
91,173
 1,078
 1.18
 82,996
 906
 1.09
Other assets(4)(5)
1,050
 
  
 555
 
  
768
 
   829
 
  
Total Assets$87,777
 $1,086
  1.24% $102,112
 $1,494
  1.46%$91,941
 $1,078
   $83,825
 $906
  
Liabilities and Capital                        
Interest-bearing liabilities:                        
Consolidated obligations:                        
Bonds(3)
$60,913
 $432
 0.71% $73,997
 $574
 0.78%$51,606
 $410
 0.79% $47,481
 $317
 0.67%
Discount notes16,325
 17
 0.10
 16,184
 21
 0.13
33,504
 136
 0.41
 28,853
 46
 0.16
Deposits and other borrowings288
 
 0.13
 635
 
 0.02
342
 1
 0.19
 1,107
 1
 0.05
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock3,376
 155
 4.59
 5,035
 51
 1.01
494
 60
 12.25
 421
 65
 15.49
Borrowings from other FHLBanks13
 
 0.46
 15
 
 0.11
Total interest-bearing liabilities80,902
 604
  0.75
 95,851
 646
  0.67
85,959
 607
 0.71
 77,877
 429
 0.55
Other liabilities(4)
1,122
 
 
 1,061
 
 
756
 
   485
 
  
Total Liabilities82,024
 604
  0.74
 96,912
 646
  0.67
86,715
 607
   78,362
 429
  
Total Capital5,753
 
 
 5,200
 
 
5,226
 
   5,463
 
  
Total Liabilities and Capital$87,777
 $604
  0.69% $102,112
 $646
  0.63%$91,941
 $607
   $83,825
 $429
  
Net Interest Income  $482
      $848
     $471
     $477
  
Net Interest Spread(6)
     0.50%      0.80%    0.47%     0.54%
Net Interest Margin(7)
     0.56%      0.84%    0.52%     0.57%
Interest-earning Assets/Interest-bearing Liabilities107.20%      105.95%     106.07%     106.57%    

(1)The average balances of AFS securities and HTM securities are reflected at amortized cost. As a result, the average rates do not reflect changes in fair value or non-credit-related OTTI charges.losses.
(2)Interest income on AFS securities includes accretion of yield adjustments on other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (resulting from improvement in expected cash flows) totaling $26$81 million and $9$74 million in 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively.
(3)Interest income/expense and average rates include the effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements, as follows:





3635


Table of Contents

2013 20122016 2015
(In millions)
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

 (Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

 
(Amortization)/
Accretion of
Hedging
Activities

 
Net Interest
Settlements

 
Total Net Interest
Income/(Expense)

Advances$(7) $(126) $(133) $(16) $(143) $(159)$(1) $(55) $(56) $(2) $(106) $(108)
Consolidated obligation bonds47
 366
 413
 61
 519
 580
4
 180
 184
 5
 257
 262

(4)Includes forward settling transactions and valuation adjustments for certain cash items.
(5)Includes non-credit-related OTTI chargeslosses on AFS and HTM securities.
(6)Net interest spread is the difference between the average rate earned on interest-earning assets and the average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities.
(7)Net interest margin is net interest income (annualized) divided by average interest-earning assets.

Net interest income in 20132016 was $482$471 million, a 43%1% decrease from $848$477 million in 2012.2015. The following table details the changes in interest income and interest expense for 20132016 compared to 2012.2015. Changes in both volume and interest rates influence changes in net interest income, net interest spread, and net interest margin.

Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2013 Compared to 2012
Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2016 Compared to 2015
Change in Net Interest Income: Rate/Volume Analysis
2016 Compared to 2015
          
Increase/
(Decrease)

 
Attributable to Changes in(1)
Increase/
(Decrease)

 
Attributable to Changes in(1)
(In millions) Average Volume
 Average Rate
 Average Volume
 Average Rate
Interest-earning assets:          
Interest-bearing deposits$2
 $
 $2
Securities purchased under agreements to resell$(4) $(2) $(2)9
 1
 8
Federal funds sold3
 4
 (1)20
 
 20
Trading securities:     
Other investments(15) 
 (15)
Available-for-sale securities:     
Trading securities: Other investments5
 (2) 7
AFS securities:     
MBS(38) (44) 6
(2) (48) 46
Other investments(3) (3) 
Held-to-maturity securities:     
HTM securities:     
MBS(81) (25) (56)(45) (25) (20)
Other investments(3) (2) (1)3
 1
 2
Mortgage loans held for portfolio(27) (22) (5)(3) (1) (2)
Advances(2)
(240) (100) (140)183
 66
 117
Total interest-earning assets(408) (194) (214)172
 (8) 180
Interest-bearing liabilities:          
Consolidated obligations:          
Bonds(2)
(142) (96) (46)93
 29
 64
Discount notes(4) 
 (4)90
 9
 81
Deposits and other borrowings


 (1) 1
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock104
 (22) 126
(5) 10
 (15)
Total interest-bearing liabilities(42) (118) 76
178
 47
 131
Net interest income$(366) $(76) $(290)$(6) $(55) $49

(1)Combined rate/volume variances, a third element of the calculation, are allocated to the rate and volume variances based on their relative sizes.
(2)Interest income/expense and average rates include the interest effect of associated interest rate exchange agreements.

Net interest income included $5 million of advance prepayment fees of $5in 2016 compared to $8 million in 2013 compared to $65 million in 2012.2015.

The net interest margin was 5652 basis points for 2013, 282016, 5 basis points lower than the net interest margin for 2012,2015, which was 8457 basis points. The net interest spread was 5047 basis points for 2013, 302016, 7 basis points lower than the net interest spread for 2012,2015, which was 8054 basis points. These decreases were primarily due to the increase inlower average balances of mortgage-related assets, partially offset by lower dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock, which are classified as interest expense, and to the decline in earnings on invested capital.expense.

3736


Table of Contents


Member demand for wholesale funding from the Bank can vary greatly depending on a number of factors, including economic and market conditions, competition from other wholesale funding sources, member deposit inflows and outflows, the activity level of the primary and secondary mortgage markets, and strategic decisions made by individual member institutions. As a result, Bank asset levels and operating results may vary significantly from period to period.

Other Income/(Loss).The following table presents the components of “Other Income/(Loss)” for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012.2015.
Other Income/(Loss)
      
(In millions)2013
 2012
2016
 2015
Other Income/(Loss):      
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)
$2
 $(11)
Total OTTI loss(14) (55)$(26) $(31)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) AOCI7
 11
10
 16
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(7) (44)(16) (15)
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1)

4
 (2)
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(23) (15)(40) (50)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities26
 (101)9
 (16)
Gains on litigation settlements, net510
 459
Other7
 7
18
 12
Total Other Income/(Loss)$5
 $(164)$485
 $388

(1) The net gain/(loss) on trading securities that were economically hedged totaled $2$1 million and $(10) milliona de minimis amount in 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively.

Net Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Loss, Credit-Related – Each quarter, the Bank updates its OTTI analysis to reflect current housing market conditions, changes in anticipated housing market conditions, observed and anticipated borrower behavior, and updated information on the loans supporting the Bank’s PLRMBS.

Additional information about the OTTI loss is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option – The following table presents the net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option for the years ended December 31, 20132016 and 2012.  2015.
Net Gain/(Loss) on Advances and Consolidated Obligation Bonds Held Under Fair Value Option
      
(In millions)2013
 2012
2016
 2015
Advances$(169) $(22)$(27) $(31)
Consolidated obligation bonds146
 7
(13) (19)
Total$(23) $(15)$(40) $(50)

Under the fair value option, the Bank elected to carry certain assets and liabilities at fair value. In general, transactions elected for the fair value option are in economic hedge relationships. Gains or losses on these transactions are generally offset by losses or gains on the derivatives that economically hedge these instruments.

The net gains/(losses) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option were primarily driven by the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and

37


Table of Contents

other market factors relative to the actual terms on the advances and consolidated obligation bonds during the period.

Additional information about advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 19 – Fair Value.”

Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities – Under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, the Bank is required to carry all of its derivative instruments on the Statement of Condition at fair value. If derivatives meet the hedging criteria, including effectiveness measures, the carrying value of the underlying hedged instruments may also be adjusted to reflect changes in the fair value attributable to the risk being hedged so that some or all of the unrealized gain or loss recognized on the derivative is offset by a corresponding unrealized loss or gain on the underlying hedged instrument. The unrealized gain or loss on the “ineffective” portion of all hedges, which represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item or the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction, is recognized in current period earnings. In addition, certain derivatives are associated with assets or liabilities but do not qualify as fair value hedges under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities. These economic hedges are recorded on the Statement of Condition at fair value with the unrealized gain or loss recorded in earnings without any offsetting unrealized loss or gain from the associated asset or liability.

The following table shows the accounting classification of hedges and the categories of hedged items that contributed to the gains and losses on derivatives and hedged items that were recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities” in 20132016 and 2012.2015.


38

Table of Contents

Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2013 Compared to 2012
Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2016 Compared to 2015
Sources of Gains/(Losses) Recorded in Net Gain/(Loss) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities
2016 Compared to 2015
                              
(In millions)2013 20122016 2015
Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

   Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

  Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

   Gain/(Loss) 
Income/
(Expense) on

  
Hedged Item
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
 
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
 
Fair Value
Hedges, Net

 
Economic
Hedges

 
Economic
Hedges

 Total
Advances:                              
Elected for fair value option$
 $156
 $(114) $42
 $
 $(10) $(127) $(137)$
 $44
 $(43) $1
 $
 $19
 $(73) $(54)
Not elected for fair value option3
 17
 (16) 4
 
 11
 (20) (9)1
 (9) 3
 (5) (1) 1
 1
 1
Consolidated obligation bonds:                              
Elected for fair value option
 (100) 66
 (34) 
 37
 37
 74

 (1) 13
 12
 
 8
 49
 57
Not elected for fair value option(5) (113) 120
 2
 (19) (122) 151
 10
(3) (18) 23
 2
 (9) (19) 35
 7
Consolidated obligation discount notes:                              
Not elected for fair value option
 34
 (21) 13
 
 6
 (42) (36)
 23
 (28) (5) 
 4
 (30) (26)
MBS:               
Not elected for fair value option
 
 
 
 
 (3) 
 (3)
Non-MBS investments:                              
Not elected for fair value option
 
 (1) (1) 
 6
 (9) (3)
 (1) 
 (1) 
 
 
 
Mortgage delivery commitment:               
Not elected for fair value option
 5
 
 5
 
 2
 
 2
Total$(2) $(6) $34
 $26
 $(19) $(72) $(10) $(101)$(2) $43
 $(32) $9
 $(10) $12
 $(18) $(16)

During 2013,2016, net gains on derivatives and hedging activities totaled $26$9 million compared to net losses of $101$16 million in 2012.2015. These amounts included incomeexpense of $34$32 million and expense of $10$18 million resulting from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges in 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Excluding the impact of income or expense from net settlements on derivative instruments used in economic hedges, the net gains or losses on fair value and economic hedges were primarily associated with the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors during the period.


38


Table of Contents

The ongoing impact of these valuation adjustments on the Bank cannot be predicted and the effects of these valuation adjustments may lead to significant volatility in future earnings, including earnings available for dividends.

Additional information about derivatives and hedging activities is provided in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

Gains on Litigation Settlements, Net – During 2016 and 2015,gains relating to settlements with certain defendants in connection with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation (after netting certain legal fees and expenses) totaled $510 million and $459 million, respectively.

Other Expense. Other expenses were $128$158 million in 20132016 compared to $134$148 million in 2012, primarily2015, reflecting lower Finance Agency assessments.higher compensation and benefits and operating expenses in 2016.

Affordable Housing Program. The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an AHP. Each FHLBank’s AHP provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances.

The Bank’s total AHP assessments equaled $86 million in 2016, compared to $78 million in 2015. The increase in the AHP assessments reflected higher earnings in 2016.

Return on Average Equity.ROE Return on average equity (ROE) was 5.36%13.63% in 2013,2016, compared to 9.44%11.68% in 2012. This decrease2015. The increase primarily reflected higher net income in 2016, and the decrease in net income in 2013 and higher average equity which rose 11%,from $5.5 billion for 2015 to $5.8 billion in 2013 from $5.2 billion in 2012.for 2016.

Dividends and Retained Earnings. In 2013,2016, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 3.99%12.33%, totaling $316$344 million, including $161$284 million in dividends on capital stock and $155$60 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends included four quarterly dividends and a special dividend in the amount of $100 million, including $83 million in dividends on capital stock and $17 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. In 2012,2015, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 0.97%12.39%, totaling $98$434 million, including $47$369 million in dividends on capital stock and $51$65 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends included four quarterly dividends and a special dividend in the amount of $145 million, including $120 million in dividends on capital stock and $25 million in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

The Bank paid these dividends in cash. Dividends on capital stock are recognized as dividends on the Statements of Capital Accounts, and dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock are recognized as interest expense on the Statements of Income.

Retained earnings related to the FHLBanks’ JCE Agreementvaluation adjustments totaled $189$18 million and $128$10 million at December 31, 20132016 and 2012,2015, respectively. Retained earnings related to the JCE Agreement totaled $500 million and $358 million at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Restricted retained earnings for loss protection and capital compliance were $2.2 billion as of December 31, 2016.

The Bank will continue to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends in future quarters.

For more information, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Results of Operations – Comparison of 2014 to 2013“Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings.Earnings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.


39


Table of Contents

Financial Condition

Total assets were $75.8$123.4 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, compared to $85.8$91.9 billion at December 31, 2013.2016. Advances decreasedincreased by $5.4$27.6 billion, or 12%55%, to $39.0$77.4 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $44.4$49.8 billion at December 31, 2013.2016. MBS decreasedincreased by $2.9$0.8 billion, or 13%5%, to $19.6$17.8 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $22.5$17.0 billion at December 31, 2013.2016. Average total assets were $84.8$104.0 billion for 2014,2017, a 3% decrease13% increase compared to $87.8$91.9 billion for 2013.2016. Average advances were $45.1$70.2 billion for 2014,2017, a 2% decrease13% increase from $45.9$62.2 billion for 2013.2016. Average MBS were $21.1$16.6 billion for 2014,2017, a 7% decrease6% increase from $22.5$15.6 billion for 2013.2016.

Advances outstanding at December 31, 2014,2017, included net unrealized gainslosses of $156$104 million, of which $67$88 million represented unrealized gainslosses on advances hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and $89$16 million represented unrealized gainslosses on economically hedged advances that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. Advances outstanding at December 31, 2013,2016, included unrealized gainslosses of $208$12 million, of which $95$22 million represented unrealized gainslosses on advances hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and $113$10 million represented unrealized gains on economically hedged advances that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. The overall decreaseincrease in the unrealized gainslosses on the hedged advances and advances carried at fair value from December 31, 2013,2016, to December 31, 2014,2017, was primarily attributable to the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors relative to the terms on the Bank’s advances during the period.

Total liabilities were $70.1$116.6 billion at December 31, 2014, a decrease2017, an increase of $10.0$30.2 billion from $80.1$86.4 billion at December 31, 2013,2016, primarily reflecting a decrease$31.8 billion increase in consolidated obligations outstanding from $77.4to $115.5 billion at December 31, 2013, to $68.92017, from $83.7 billion at December 31, 2014, and2016, partially offset by a $1.3 billion decrease in mandatory redeemable capital stockborrowings from $2.1 billion at December 31, 2013, to $0.7 billion at December 31, 2014. The decrease in mandatorily redeemable capital stock was primarily attributable to the Bank’s redemption and repurchase of excess capital stock during 2014.other FHLBanks. Average total liabilities were $79.1$97.9 billion for 2014,2017, a 4% decrease13% increase compared to $82.0$86.7 billion for 2013.2016. Average consolidated obligations were $76.4$96.6 billion for 20142017 and $77.2$85.1 billion for 2013. The decrease in average liabilities reflected a decrease in average mandatorily redeemable capital stock and a decrease in average consolidated obligations.2016.

Consolidated obligations outstanding at December 31, 2014,2017, included unrealized lossesgains of $308$37 million on consolidated obligation bonds hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and unrealized gains of $31$6 million on economically hedged consolidated obligation bonds that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. Consolidated obligations outstanding at December 31, 2013,2016, included unrealized losses of $491$6 million on consolidated obligation bonds hedged in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities and unrealized gains of $115$8 million on economically hedged consolidated obligation bonds that are carried at fair value in accordance with the fair value option. The decreaseincrease in the net unrealized lossesgains on the hedged consolidated obligation bonds and the decrease in the unrealized gains on the consolidated obligation bonds carried at fair value from December 31, 2013,2016, to December 31, 2014,2017, were primarily attributable to the effects of changes in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors relative to the actual terms on the Bank's consolidated obligation bonds during the period.

As provided by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The Bank has never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 2014,2017, and through the filing date of this report, does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so. The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $847.2$1,034.3 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, and $766.8$989.3 billion at December 31, 2013.2016.


40

Table of Contents

On December 10, 2014, Standard & Poor’s Rating Services (Standard & Poor’s)August 29, 2017, S&P Global Ratings (S&P) affirmed the long-term issuer credit ratings on all of the FHLBanks except the FHLBank of Seattle and on the senior unsecured debt issued by the FHLBank System at AA+, following the application of its revised nonbank financial institution methodology, which includes various U.S. government-related entities, including the FHLBanks. Standard & Poor’s also affirmed the long-term issuer credit rating of the FHLBank of Seattle at AA.. The outlook for all ratings remainsremained stable.

On August 1, 2014,November 14, 2017, Moody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) affirmed the Aaa long-term senior ratings of the FHLBank System, the FHLBank of Des Moines, and the FHLBank of Seattle following the July 31, 2014, announcement that the FHLBanks of Des Moines and Seattle had entered into an exclusivity arrangement regarding a potential merger of the two FHLBanks.System. The outlook for all ratings remainsremained stable.

40


Table of Contents


Changes in the long-term credit ratings of individual FHLBanks do not necessarily affect the credit rating of the consolidated obligations issued on behalf of the FHLBanks. Rating agencies may change or withdraw a rating from time to time because of various factors, including operating results or actions taken, business developments, or changes in their opinion regarding, among other factors, the general outlook for a particular industry or the economy.

The Bank evaluated the publicly disclosed FHLBank regulatory actions and long-term credit ratings of the other FHLBanks as of December 31, 2014, and as of each period end presented, and does not believe, as of the date of this report, that it is probable that the Bank will be required to repay any principal or interest associated with consolidated obligations for which the Bank is not the primary obligor.

The Bank’s financial condition is further discussed under “Segment Information.”

Segment Information

The Bank uses an analysis of financial performanceresults based on the balancesfinancial components and adjusted net interest income of two operating segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business, as well as other financial information, to review and assess financial performance and determine financial management strategies related to determine the allocationoperations of resources to these two major business segments. For purposes of segment reporting, adjusted net interest income includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges that are recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities” in other income and excludes interest expense that is recorded in “Mandatorily redeemable capital stock.” Other key financial information, such as any credit-related OTTI losses on the Bank’s PLRMBS, other expenses, and assessments, is not included in the segment reporting analysis, but is incorporated into the Bank’s overall assessment of financial performance. For a reconciliation of the Bank’s operating segment adjusted net interest income to the Bank’s total net interest income, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 17 – Segment Information.”

Advances-Related Business. The advances-related business consists of advances and other credit products, related financing and hedging instruments, and liquidity and other non-MBS investments associated with the Bank’s role as a liquidity provider, and capital. Assets associated with this segment decreased $6.9increased $29.4 billion or 11%, to $55.4$103.4 billion (73% (84% of total assets) at December 31, 20142017, from $62.3$74.0 billion (73%(81% of total assets) at December 31, 20132016.

Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on advances and non-MBS investments and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding these assets, including the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements, and from earnings on capital.

Adjusted net interest income for this segment was $166$234 million in 20142017, aan decreaseincrease of $9$80 million, or 5%52%, compared with $175to $154 million in 20132016. The decreaseincrease was primarily due to a declinean improvement in spreads and higher balances on advances-related assets and higher earnings on invested capital because of lower average capital balances and the lower interest rate environment, as well as lower earningsfrom an increase in spreads on non-MBS investments, partially offset by improved spreads on advances-related assets.


41

Table of Contents

Adjusted net interest income for this segment was $175 million in 2013, a decrease of $99 million, or 36%, compared with $274 million in 2012. The decrease was primarily due to lower earnings from advance prepayment fees, a decline in earnings on invested capital because of the lower interest rate environment and lower average capital balances, less favorable funding costs, and lower average balances of advances.fees.

Adjusted net interest income for this segment represented 29%42%, 28%31%, and 35%31% of total adjusted net interest income for 20142017, 20132016, and 2012,2015, respectively.

Members and nonmember borrowers prepaid $1,650 million$8.5 billion of advances in 20142017 compared to $365 million$3.5 billion in 20132016. Interest income was increased by net prepayment fees of $6$1 million in 20142017 and $5 million in 2013.2016.

Advances – The par value of advances outstanding decreasedincreased by $5.4$27.7 billion,, or 12%56%, to $38.8$77.5 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $44.2$49.8 billion at December 31, 2013.2016. Average advances outstanding were $45.1$70.2 billion in 20142017, a 13% increase from $62.2 billion in 2%2016. Outstanding balances of advances may significantly increase and decrease from $45.9 billion in 2013.period to period because of a member’s liquidity and financial strategies.

The decrease in advances outstanding was primarily attributable to a $6.9 billion net decrease inAs of December 31, 2017, advances outstanding to the Bank’s top five borrowers and their affiliates. Advances to the top five borrowers declined to $21.4affiliates increased by $16.0 billion, at December 31, 2014, from $28.3 billion at December 31, 2013. The decrease was partially offset by a $1.5 billionincrease in total and advances outstanding to the Bank’s other borrowers increased by $11.7 billion. Advances to the top five borrowers increased to $48.4 billion at December 31, 2017, from $32.4 billion at December 31, 2016. (See

41


Table of varying asset sizesContents

“Item 8. Financial Statements and charter types.Supplementary Data – Note 8 – Advances – Credit and Concentration Risk” for further information.)

During the fourth quarter of 2017, Charles Schwab Bank increased its advances balance from $5.0 billion as of September 30, 2017 to $15.0 billion as of December 31, 2017. If the advances outstanding to Charles Schwab Bank (and the other top five borrowers) with contractual maturities of one year or less are repaid as they come due and no other advances are made to replace them, the Bank’s assets would decrease significantly in 2018. In addition, as of December 31, 2017, JPMorgan Chase had $11.4 billion in advances outstanding, of which a significant portion is expected to be redeemed during 2018. Because JPMorgan Chase is not a member of the Bank, it is not able to borrow new advances from the Bank or replace outstanding advances as they are repaid or prepaid. (See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 8 – Advances”Advances – Redemption Terms” for further information.) In total, 83 members increased their use of advances during 2014, while 68 borrowers decreased their advances borrowings.

The $5.4$27.7 billiondecrease increase in advances outstanding primarily reflected a $6.7$20.5 billiondecrease increase in fixed rate advances and a $4.9 billion increase in adjustable rate advances, partially offset by a $0.7 billion increase in adjustable rate advances and a $0.6$2.3 billion increase in variable rate advances.

The components of the advances portfolio at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, are presented in the following table.
Advances Portfolio by Product Type
              
2014 20132017 2016
(Dollar in millions)Par Value
 Percentage of Total Par Value
 Par Value
 Percentage of Total Par Value
Par Value
 Percentage of Total Par Value
 Par Value
 Percentage of Total Par Value
Adjustable – LIBOR$7,068
 19% $6,378
 15%$6,957
 9% $3,232
 6%
Adjustable – LIBOR, with caps and/or floors56
 
 
 
Adjustable – LIBOR, callable at borrower’s option16,495
 21
 15,396
 31
Adjustable – LIBOR, with caps and/or floors and PPS(1)
100
 
 124
 
83
 
 30
 
Adjustable – Other Indices2
 
 2
 
Subtotal adjustable rate advances7,224
 19
 6,502
 15
23,537
 30
 18,660
 37
Fixed22,626
 58
 27,365
 62
38,242
 50
 20,448
 42
Fixed – amortizing242
 1
 276
 1
210
 
 214
 
Fixed – with PPS(1)
3,991
 10
 6,193
 14
4,035
 5
 3,060
 6
Fixed – with caps and PPS(1)
425
 1
 200
 
425
 1
 375
 1
Fixed – callable at borrower’s option4
 
 4
 
1,802
 2
 2
 
Fixed – callable at borrower’s option with PPS(1)
324
 1
 231
 1
75
 
 107
 
Fixed – putable at Bank’s option65
 
 97
 

 
 50
 
Fixed – putable at Bank’s option with PPS(1)
75
 
 85
 

 
 75
 
Subtotal fixed rate advances27,752
 71
 34,451
 78
44,789
 58
 24,331
 49
Daily variable rate3,854
 10
 3,234
 7
9,160
 12
 6,866
 14
Total par value$38,830
 100% $44,187
 100%$77,486
 100% $49,857
 100%


42

Table of Contents

(1)Partial prepayment symmetry (PPS) is a product feature under which the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid. Any prepayment credit on an advance with PPS would be limited to the lesser of 10% of the par value of the advance or the gain recognized on the termination of the associated interest rate swap, which may also include a similar contractual gain limitation.

For a discussion of advances credit risk, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Advances.”

Non-MBS Investments The Bank’s non-MBS investment portfolio consists of financial instruments that are used primarily to facilitate the Bank’s role as a cost-effective provider of credit and liquidity to members and to support the operations of the Bank. The Bank’s total non-MBS investment portfolio was $12.3$25.7 billion and $12.8$23.9 billion as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, respectively. The declineincrease in the total size of the non-MBS investment portfolio

42


Table of Contents

reflects higher balances of Federal funds sold, partially offset by lower balances of certificates of deposits, partially offset by higher balances of agency debentures and short-term securities purchased under agreements to resell.resell, agency securities, and certificates of deposit.

Cash and Due from Banks – Cash and due from banks was $3.9 billionInterest rate payment terms for non-MBS investments classified as HTM at December 31, 20142017 and 2016, a $1.0 billion decrease compared to December 31, 2013. Cash and due from banks is largely composed of cash held atare detailed in the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco and can increase or decrease depending on other investment opportunities.following table:
Non-MBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment Terms
    
(In millions)2017
 2016
Amortized cost of HTM securities other than MBS:   
Fixed rate$500

$1,350
Adjustable rate187

225
Total$687

$1,575

Borrowings – Total liabilities (primarily consolidated obligations) funding the advances-related business decreasedincreased to $96.6 billion at December 31, 2017, from $49.768.5 billion at December 31, 2014, from $56.6 billion at December 31, 20132016. For further information and discussion of the Bank’s joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Financial Condition” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

To meet the specific needs of certain investors, fixed and adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain embedded call options or other features that result in complex coupon payment terms. When these consolidated obligation bonds are issued on behalf of the Bank, typically the Bank simultaneously enters into interest rate exchange agreements with features that offset the complex features of the bonds and, in effect, convert the bonds to adjustable rate instruments tied to an index, primarily LIBOR.instruments. For example, the Bank uses fixed rate callable bonds that are typically offset with interest rate exchange agreements with call features that offset the call options embedded in the callable bonds. This combined financing structure enables the Bank to meet its funding needs at costs not generally attainable solely through the issuance of comparable term non-callable debt.

At December 31, 20142017, the notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements associated with the advances-related business totaled $55.295.5 billion, of which $17.844.3 billion were hedging advances, $35.050.4 billion were hedging consolidated obligations, and $2.40.8 billion were economically hedging trading securities.securities, and $14 million were offsetting derivatives. At December 31, 20132016, the notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements associated with the advances-related business totaled $72.859.4 billion, of which $21.318.7 billion were hedging advances, $48.239.9 billion were hedging consolidated obligations, $2.90.7 billion were economically hedging trading securities, and $0.4$0.1 billion were interest rate exchange agreements that the Bank entered into as an intermediary between offsetting derivative transactions with members and other counterparties.derivatives. The hedges associated with advances and consolidated obligations were primarily used to convert the fixed rate cash flows and non-LIBOR-indexed cash flows of the advances and consolidated obligations to adjustable rate LIBOR-indexed cash flows or to manage the interest rate sensitivity and net repricing gaps of assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements.

FHLBank System consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes, along with similar debt securities issued by other GSEs such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, are generally referred to as agency debt. The costs of debt issued by the FHLBanks and the other GSEs generally rise and fall with increases and decreases in general market interest rates.

The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) has not changed the target Federal funds rate since December 16, 2008. The FOMC’s forward guidance regarding monetary policy was modified after the December 2014 meeting to reflect the FOMC’s intent to remain patient in adjusting the Federal funds target rate higher. Asfollowing table presents a comparison of selected market interest rates as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. All selected market interest rates increased in 2017 compared to the prior yearend.

43


Table of Contents

2014, rates on 3-month U.S. Treasury bills and 5-year U.S. Treasury notes declined while rates on 3-month LIBOR and 2-year U.S. Treasury notes increased compared with December 31, 2013.
Selected Market Interest Rates
        
Market InstrumentDecember 31, 2014December 31, 20132017 2016
Federal Reserve target rate for overnight Federal funds0-0.25
%0-0.25
%
Federal Reserve target range for overnight Federal funds1.25-1.50
% 0.50-0.75
%
3-month Treasury bill0.03
 0.06
 1.36
 0.50
 
3-month LIBOR0.26
 0.25
 1.69
 1.00
 
2-year Treasury note0.67
 0.38
 1.89
 1.19
 
5-year Treasury note1.65
 1.74
 2.21
 1.93
 

The following table presents a comparison of the average issuance cost of FHLBank System consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes relativeconverted to 3-month LIBOR, or to comparable term LIBOR if the term was less than 3 months,LIBOR-indexed liabilities through interest rate swaps in 20142017 and 20132016. Lower 3-monthThe average issuance cost relative to LIBOR ratesof bonds improved while the average issuance cost of discount notes deteriorated in 20142017 compared to 20132016 contributed to higher relative borrowing costs for both FHLBank System consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes..

Spread to LIBOR of Average Cost of
Consolidated Obligations for the Twelve Months Ended
Spread to LIBOR of Average Cost of
Consolidated Obligations for the Twelve Months Ended
(In basis points)December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
Consolidated obligation bonds–12.4 –14.2–21.6 –14.8
Consolidated obligation discount notes (one month and greater)–14.7 –18.0–26.1 –30.5

Mortgage-Related Business. The mortgage-related business consists of MBS investments, mortgage loans acquired through the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®)Finance (MPF) Program, and the related financing and hedging instruments. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance” and “MPF” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.) Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield on the MBS and mortgage loans and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding those assets, including the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements.

At December 31, 20142017, assets associated with this segment were $20.420.0 billion (27%16% of total assets), a decreasean increase of $3.12.1 billion from $23.517.9 billion at December 31, 20132016 (27%19% of total assets).

Adjusted net interest income for this segment was $410$325 million in 20142017, a decrease of $39$13 million, or 9%4%, from $449$338 million in 20132016. The decrease in adjusted net interest income was primarily due to lower spreads on interest-earning assets, primarily caused by lower spreads on new investments, and lower accretion-related income, which more than offset the impact of higher average unpaid principal balances of MBS investments and mortgage loans, partially offset by improved spreads on mortgage-related assets, including the accretion of yield adjustments on certain other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS resulting from improvement in expected cash flows.loans.

Adjusted net interest income for this segment represented 71%58%, 72%69%, and 65%69% of total adjusted net interest income for 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively.

MBS Investments – The Bank’s MBS portfolio was $19.617.8 billion at December 31, 20142017, compared with $22.517.0 billion at December 31, 20132016. During 2014,2017, the Bank’s MBS portfolio decreasedincreased primarily because of principal repayments totaling $3.4$4.9 billion, in new MBS investments, partially offset by purchases of $0.2$4.1 billion of agency residential MBS and a $0.2 billion improvement in the fair value of PLRMBS classified as AFS. In 2014, averageprincipal repayments. Average MBS investments were $21.1$16.6 billion a decreasein 2017, an increase of $1.4$1.0 billion from $22.5$15.6 billion in 2013.2016. For a discussion of the composition of the Bank’s MBS portfolio and the Bank’s OTTI analysis of that portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Investments” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”


44

Table of Contents

Intermediate-term and long-term fixed rate MBS investments are subject to prepayment risk, and intermediate-term and long-term adjustable rate MBS investments are also subject to interest rate cap risk. The Bank has managed these risks predominately by purchasing intermediate-term fixed rate MBS (rather than long-term fixed rate MBS), funding the fixed rate MBS with a mix of non-callable and callable debt, and using interest rate exchange agreements with interest rate risk characteristics similar to callable debt. The Bank has purchased interest rate caps to hedge some of the interest rate cap risk associated with the long-term adjustable rate MBS investments.

44


Table of Contents


Interest rate payment terms for MBS securities at December 31, 2017 and 2016, are shown in the following table:
MBS Investments: Interest Rate Payment Terms
    
(In millions)2017
 2016
Amortized cost of MBS:   
Passthrough securities:   
Fixed rate$26
 $84
Adjustable rate2,406
 1,414
Subtotal2,432
 1,498
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Fixed rate4,738
 6,427
Adjustable rate10,325
 8,989
Subtotal15,063
 15,416
Total$17,495
 $16,914

Certain MBS classified as fixed rate passthrough securities and fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations have an initial fixed interest rate that subsequently converts to an adjustable interest rate on a specified date as follows:
(In millions)2017
 2016
Passthrough securities:   
Converts in 1 year or less$
 $48
Converts after 1 year through 5 years24
 32
Total$24
 $80
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Converts in 1 year or less$
 $91
Total$
 $91

MPF Program – Under the MPF Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and FHA/VA-insured mortgage loans from members forinsured by the Bank’s own portfolioFederal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) under the Original MPF and MPF Government products.product. In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra®Xtra product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. (“MPF Xtra” is a registered trademark of the FHLBank of Chicago.) As of December 31, 2014, the Bank had approved fourWhen members as participating financial institutions and had purchased $4 million in eligiblesell mortgage loans under the Original MPF product since renewing its participation inXtra, MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the MPF Program inloans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the fourth quarterBank’s Statements of 2013.Condition.

From May 2002 through October 2006, the Bank purchased conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from its participating financial institutions under the MPF Original MPF and MPF Plus products. Participating members originated or purchased the mortgage loans, credit-enhanced them and sold them to the Bank, and generally retained the servicing of the loans.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, all mortgage loans purchased by the Bank under the MPF Program were qualifying conventional conforming fixed rate, first lien mortgage loans with fully amortizing loan terms of up to 30 years. A conventional loan is one that is not insured by the federal government or any of its agencies. Conforming loan size, which is established annually as required by Finance Agency regulations, may not exceed the loan limits set by the Finance Agency each year. All MPF loans are secured by owner-occupied, one- to four-unit residential properties or single-unit second homes.

45


Table of Contents


The MPF Servicing Guide establishes the MPF Program requirements for loan servicing and servicer eligibility. At the time the Bank purchases loans under the MPF Program, the member selling the loans makes representations that all mortgage loans it delivers to the Bank have the characteristics of an investment quality mortgage. An investment quality mortgage is a loan that is made to a borrower from whom repayment of the debt can be expected, is adequately secured by real property, and was originated and is being serviced in accordance with the MPF Origination Guide and MPF Servicing Guide or an approved waiver.

The FHLBank of Chicago, which developed the MPF Program, establishes the minimum eligibility standards for members to participate in the program, the structure of the MPF products, and the standard eligibility criteria for the loans; establishes pricing and manages the delivery mechanism for the loans; publishes and maintains the MPF Origination Guide and the MPF Servicing Guide; and provides operational support for the program. In addition, the FHLBank of Chicago acts as master servicer and as master custodian for the MPF loans held by the Bank and is compensated for these services through fees paid by the Bank. The FHLBank of Chicago is obligated to provide operational support to the Bank for all loans purchased until those loans are fully repaid.

As of December 31, 2017, the Bank had approved 23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in 2013. The Bank purchased $1.4 billion in eligible loans under the MPF Original product during 2017.

Mortgage loan balances declinedincreased to $0.7$2.1 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $0.9$0.8 billion at December 31, 2013, a decline2016, an increase of $0.2$1.3 billion. Average mortgage loans were $0.8$1.4 billion in 2014, a decrease2017, an increase of $0.3$0.7 billion from $1.1$0.7 billion in 2013.2016.

At December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, the Bank held conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans purchased under one of two MPF products, MPF Plus or MPF Original, MPF, which are described in greater detail in “Management's“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – MPF Program.” Mortgage loan balances at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, were as follows:


45

Table of Contents

Mortgage Loan Balances by MPF Product Type
      
(In millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
MPF Plus$653
 $835
$267
 $354
Original MPF60
 78
MPF Original1,738
 460
Subtotal713
 913
2,005
 814
Unamortized premiums6
 10
76
 18
Unamortized discounts(10) (16)(5) (6)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio709
 907
2,076
 826
Less: Allowance for credit losses(1) (2)
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$708
 $905
$2,076
 $826

The following table presents the balances of loans wholly owned by the Bank and loans with allocated participation interests that were outstanding as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016. Only the FHLBank of Chicago owned participation interests in any of the Bank’s MPF loans.


46


Table of Contents

Balances Outstanding on Mortgage Loans
      
(Dollars in millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Outstanding amounts wholly owned by the Bank$462
 $581
$1,916
 $688
Outstanding amounts with participation interests by FHLBank:      
San Francisco251
 332
89
 126
Chicago156
 201
62
 84
Total$869
 $1,114
$2,067
 $898
Number of loans outstanding:      
Number of outstanding loans wholly owned by the Bank4,111
 4,819
5,797
 3,671
Number of outstanding loans participated5,013
 5,929
2,203
 3,180
Total number of loans outstanding9,124
 10,748
8,000
 6,851

Under the Bank’s agreement with the FHLBank of Chicago, the credit risk is shared pro rata between the two FHLBanks according to: (i) their respective ownership of the loans in each master commitment for MPF Plus and (ii) their respective participation shares of the first loss account for the master commitment for Original MPF.MPF Original.

The Bank is responsible for credit oversight of the participating financial institution, which consists of monitoring the financial condition of the participating financial institution on a quarterly basis and holding collateral to secure the participating financial institution’s outstanding credit enhancement obligations. Monitoring of the participating financial institution’s financial condition includes an evaluation of its capital, assets, management, earnings, and liquidity.

The Bank performs periodic reviews of its mortgage loan portfolio to identify probable credit losses in the portfolio and to determine the likelihood of collection ofon the loans in the portfolio. For more information on the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – MPF Program” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Credit Losses – Mortgage Loans Acquired Under the MPF Program.”

The Bank manages the interest rate risk and prepayment risk of the mortgage loans by funding these assets with callable and non-callable debt, by entering into certain interest rate swaps, and by limiting the size of the fixed rate mortgage loan portfolio.


46

Table of Contents

Borrowings – Total consolidated obligations funding the mortgage-related business decreased$3.1increased $2.1 billion to $20.4$20.0 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, from $23.5$17.9 billion at December 31, 2013,2016, paralleling the decreaseincrease in mortgage portfolio assets.MBS investments. For further information and discussion of the Bank’s joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

The notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements associated with the mortgage-related business totaled $7.14.1 billion at December 31, 20142017, of which $4.9$2.6 billion were hedging or were associated with consolidated obligations funding the mortgage portfolio and $1.5 billion were associated with MBS. The notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements associated with the mortgage-related business totaled $5.6 billion at December 31, 2016, of which $3.4 billion were hedging or were associated with consolidated obligations funding the mortgage portfolio and $2.2 billion were associated with MBS. The notional amount of interest rate agreements associated with the mortgage-related business, all of which were hedging or were associated with consolidated obligations funding the mortgage portfolio, totaled $8.8 billion at December 31, 2013.





47


Table of Contents

Liquidity and Capital Resources

The Bank’s financial strategies are designed to enable the Bank to expand and contract its assets, liabilities, and capital as membership composition and member credit needs change. The Bank’s liquidity and capital resources are designed to support its financial strategies. The Bank’s primary source of liquidity is its access to the debt capital markets through consolidated obligation issuance, which is described in “Item 1. Business – Funding Sources.” The Bank’s status as a GSE is critical to maintaining its access to the capital markets. Although consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks and are not guaranteed by the U.S. government, the capital markets have traditionally treated the FHLBanks’ consolidated obligations as comparable to federal agency debt, providing the FHLBanks with access to funding at relatively favorable rates. The maintenance of the Bank’s capital resources areis governed by its capital plan.

Liquidity

The Bank strives to maintain the liquidity necessary to meet member credit demands, repay maturing consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor, and meet other obligations and commitments.commitments, and meet expected and unexpected member credit demands. The Bank monitors its financial position in an effortorder to ensure that it hasmaintain ready access to sufficient liquid funds to meet normal transaction requirements, take advantage of appropriate investment opportunities, and cover unforeseen liquidity demands.

The Bank’s ability to expand as member credit needs increase is based, in part, on the capital stock requirements for advances. A member is required to maintain sufficient capital stock to support its advances activity and loan sale activity with the Bank. Unless a member already has sufficient excess capital stock, it must increase its capital stock investment in the Bank as its balance of outstanding advances increases and as it sellsincreases. Under the Bank’s Capital Plan, the Bank may also require a member to purchase activity-based stock for mortgage loans topurchased and held by the Bank. The activity-based capital stock requirement is currently 4.7%2.7% for outstanding advances and 5.0%0.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank, while the Bank’s minimum regulatory capital-to-assets ratio requirement is currently 4.0%.; therefore, the Bank maintains a certain required level of retained earnings to support capital compliance and business growth. For more information, see “Item 1. Business – Dividends and Retained Earnings” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital – Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.” Because the Bank’s capital plan does not provide for the issuance of Class A stock (non-permanent capital that is redeemable upon six months’ notice), regulatory capital for the Bank is composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes), and excludes AOCI.

The Bank amended its capital plan, effective April 1, 2015, to lower the cap on the membership stock requirement to $15 million from $25 million, lower the activity-based stock requirement to 3.0% from 4.7% for outstanding advances and to 3.0% from 5.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank, and change the authorized ranges for the activity-based stock requirement.

The Bank is also able to contract its balance sheet as borrowers’ credit needs decrease. As changing borrower credit
needs result in reduced advances, borrowers will have capital stock in excess of the amount required by the Bank’s
capital plan. The Bank’s capital plan allows the Bank to repurchase a borrower’s excess capital stock, at the Bank’s
discretion. The Framework sets forth the Bank’s practice of repurchasing the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on a regular quarterly basis, at the Bank’s discretion ifand subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the borrower reduces its advances. Bank’s Risk Management Policy and capital plan limitations. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement.

The Bank may also allow its consolidated obligations to mature

47

Table of Contents

without replacement or repurchase and retire outstanding consolidated obligations, allowing its balance sheet to contract.

Total assets were $75.8 billion at December 31, 2014, compared to $86.4 billion at December 31, 2012. Advances decreased from $43.8 billion at December 31, 2012, to $39.0 billion at December 31, 2014. The contraction of advances resulted in corresponding decreases in consolidated obligations. Consolidated obligations decreased from $75.5 billion at December 31, 2012, to $68.9 billion at December 31, 2014. The contraction also resulted in a decrease in capital stock. Capital stock outstanding, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (a liability), decreased from $8.5 billion at December 31, 2012, to $4.0 billion at December 31, 2014. The Bank maintained its strong regulatory capital position while repurchasing $3.0 billion$414 million and $2.0 billion$812 million in excess capital stock during 20132017 and 20142016, respectively, and redeeming $502$75 million and $296$28 million in mandatorily redeemable capital stock in 20132017 and 20142016, respectively. Total excess capital stock was $1.1 billion$493 million as of December 31, 20142017, compared to $5.5 billion$488 million as of December 31, 2012.2016.


48


Table of Contents

The Bank is not able to predict future trends in member credit needs since they are driven by complex interactions among a number of factors, including members’ mortgage loan growth, other asset portfolio growth, deposit growth, and the attractiveness of advances compared to other wholesale borrowing alternatives. The Bank regularly monitors current trends and anticipates future debt issuance needs with the objective of being prepared to fund its members’ credit needs and appropriate investment opportunities.

Short-term liquidity management practices are described in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Liquidity Risk.” The Bank manages its liquidity needs to enable it to meet all of its contractual obligations on a timely basis, to support its members’ daily liquidity needs, and to pay operating expenditures as they come due. The Bank maintains contingency liquidity plans to meet its obligations and the liquidity needs of members in the event of short-term operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance or short-term disruptions of the capital markets. For further information and discussion of the Bank’s guarantees and other commitments, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations.” For further information and discussion of the Bank’s joint and several liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Financial Condition” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

Capital

The Bank may repurchase some or all of a shareholder’s excess capital stock, andincluding any excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank must give the shareholder 15 days’ written notice; however, the shareholder may waive this notice period. The Bank may also repurchase some or all of a shareholder'smember's excess capital stock at the shareholder’sa member’s request, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. Excess capital stock is defined as any capital stock holdings in excess of a shareholder's minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan.

A member may schedule redemption of its excess capital stock following a five-year redemption period, subject to certain conditions, by providing a written redemption notice to the Bank. Capital stock may also become subject to redemption following a five-year redemption period after a member gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination, or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member’s Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity. Capital stock required to meet a withdrawing member’s membership capital stock requirement may only be redeemed at the end of the five-year redemption period, subject to statutory and regulatory limits and other conditions.

On a quarterly basis, the Bank determines whether it will repurchase excess capital stock. In order to preserve capital in view of the possibility of future OTTI charges on the Bank’s PLRMBS portfolio, the Bank did not

48


repurchase all excess capital stock, created primarily by declining advances balances, in 2014 and 2013. The Bank maintained its strong regulatory capital position while repurchasing $2.0 billion$414 million and $3.0 billion$812 million in excess capital stock during 20142017 and 20132016, respectively.

The Bank's Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework (Framework) sets forth the Bank’s practice of repurchasing the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on a regular quarterly basis, at the Bank’s discretion and subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the Bank’s Risk Management Policy and capital plan limitations. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement, and excess capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of a shareholder’s minimum stock requirement. In addition, at the Bank’s discretion, all of the excess stock held by a member may be repurchased upon request of the member, subject to the requirements and limitations mentioned above. In accordance with the Framework, each quarter Bank management evaluates and determines the amount of capital stock to be repurchased in that quarter, if any, giving consideration to certain capital metrics and capital management objectives and strategies, and subject to the requirements and limitations listed above. At least 15 calendar days before any repurchase, the Bank will notify shareholders of its intention to repurchase capital stock and of the scheduled repurchase date. On the scheduled

49



repurchase date, the Bank will calculate the amount of stock to be repurchased to ensure that each member and former nonmember shareholder will continue to meet its minimum stock requirement after the repurchase.

In accordance with its practice, the Bank plans to repurchase the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on March 16, 2018.

The Bank is required to redeem any mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is in excess of a former member’s minimum stock requirement on or after the expiration of the five-year redemption date. During 20142017 and 20132016, the Bank redeemed $296$75 million and $502$28 million, respectively, in mandatorily redeemable capital stock, for which the five-year redemption period had expired, at its $100 par value. The stock was redeemed on the scheduled redemption dates or, for stock that was not excess stock on its scheduled redemption date because of outstanding activity with the Bank, on the first available repurchase date after the stock was no longer required to support outstanding activity with the Bank.

The Bank will continue to monitor the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of the Bank’stotal capital to the par value of the Bank’s capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the repurchase of excess capital stock in future quarters.

Excess capital stock totaled $1.1 billion$493 million as of December 31, 20142017, and $2.4 billionwhich included surplus capital stock of $317 million. Excess capital stock totaled $488 million as of December 31, 20132016., which included surplus capital stock of $325 million.

Provisions of the Bank’s capital plan are more fully discussed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital.”

Regulatory Capital Requirements

The FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations specify that each FHLBank must meet certain minimum regulatory capital standards. The Bank must maintain: (i) total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least 4% of its total assets, (ii) leverage capital in an amount equal to at least 5% of its total assets, and (iii) permanent capital in an amount that is greater than or equal to its risk-based capital requirement. Because the Bank issues only Class B stock, regulatory capital and permanent capital for the Bank are both composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes). Regulatory capital and permanent capital do not include AOCI. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital weighted by a 1.5 multiplier plus non-permanent capital. The risk-based capital requirement is equal to the sum of the Bank’s credit risk, market risk, and operations risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency.

The following table shows the Bank’s compliance with the Finance Agency’s capital requirements at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016. The Bank’s risk-based capital requirement decreased to $3.2$2.0 billion at December 31, 20142017, from $3.9$2.2 billion at December 31, 20132016.  
Regulatory Capital Requirements
              
2014 20132017 2016
(Dollars in millions)Required
 Actual
 Required
 Actual
Required
 Actual
 Required
 Actual
Risk-based capital$3,231
 $6,356
 $3,912
 $7,925
$2,023
 $6,797
 $2,241
 $5,883
Total regulatory capital$3,032
 $6,356
 $3,431
 $7,925
4,935
 6,797
 3,678
 5,883
Total regulatory capital ratio4.00% 8.38% 4.00% 9.24%4.00% 5.51% 4.00% 6.40%
Leverage capital$3,790
 $9,534
 $4,289
 $11,888
$6,169
 $10,195
 $4,597
 $8,825
Leverage ratio5.00% 12.58% 5.00% 13.86%5.00% 8.26% 5.00% 9.60%

The Bank’s total regulatory capital ratio decreased to 8.38% at December 31, 2014, from 9.24% at December 31, 2013, primarily because of the decrease in regulatory capital resulting from the Bank’s excess capital stock repurchase activity. The Bank repurchased $2.0 billion in excess capital stock in 2014.
50


49


In light of the Bank’s strong regulatory capital position, the
The Bank plans to repurchase $750repurchased $414 million in excess capital stock on March 20, 2015. This repurchase, combined withduring 2017. As a result of changes in the estimated redemption of up to $5 millionBank’s capital plan in mandatorily redeemable2015 that reduced the activity-based capital stock duringrequirement to 2.7% for outstanding advances and 0.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the first quarter of 2015, will reduce the Bank’s excessBank, both capital stock by upand retained earnings are required to $755 million. The amount of excesssupport regulatory capital stock to be repurchased from each shareholder will be based on the total amount of capital stock (including mandatorily redeemable capital stock) outstanding to all shareholders on the repurchase date. The Bank will repurchase an equal percentage of each shareholder’s total capital stock to the extent that the shareholder has sufficient excess capital stock.compliance.

The Bank’s capital requirements are more fully discussed in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital.”

Risk Management

The Bank has an integrated corporate governance and internal control framework designed to support effective management of the Bank’s business activities and the risks inherent in these activities. As part of this framework, the Bank’s Board of Directors has adopted a Risk Governance Policy that outlines the key roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors and management and sets forth how the Bank is organized to achieve its risk management objectives, including the implementation of the Bank’s strategic objectives, risk management strategies, corporate governance, and standards of conduct. The policy also establishes the Bank’s risk governance organizational structure and identifies the general roles and responsibilities of the Board of Directors and management in establishing risk management policies, procedures, and guidelines; in overseeing the enterprise risk profile; and in implementing enterprise risk management processes and business strategies. The policy establishes an independent risk oversight function to identify, assess, measure, monitor, and report on the enterprise risk profile and risk management capabilities of the Bank.

The Bank’s risk management framework includes a risk appetite statement, the risk policies, and related procedures and guidelines established by the Board of Directors and management to address and manage risk. These include both enterprise-wide risk policies and related procedures and guidelines.

The Risk Management Policy establishes risk limits, guidelines, and standards for credit risk, market risk, liquidity risk, operations risk, and business risk in accordance with Finance Agency regulations, the risk profile established by the Board of Directors, and other applicable guidelines in connection with the Bank’s overall risk management. The Member Products Policy, which applies to products offered to members and housing associates (nonmember mortgagees approved under Title II of the National Housing Act, to which the Bank is permitted to make advances under the FHLBank Act), addresses the credit risk of secured credit by establishing credit underwriting criteria, appropriate collateralization levels, and collateral valuation methodologies. The Bank also establishes polices for capital risk management and compliance risk management.

Business Risk

Business risk is defined as the possibility of an adverse impact on the Bank’s ability to fulfill its mission and to meet ongoing business and profitability objectives as a result ofresulting from external factors that may occur in both the short and long term. Such factors may include, but are not limited to, continued financial services industry consolidation; changes in the membership base and in member demand for Bank products; the concentration of borrowing among members; the introduction of new competing products and services; increased inter-FHLBank and non-FHLBank competition; and significant adverse changes to the effectiveness and competitiveness of the Bank’s products, services, or business model associated with regulatory and legislative changes.
The identification of business risks is an integral part of the Bank’s annual planning process, and the Bank’s strategic plan identifies initiatives and plans to address these risks.


50


Operations Risk

Operations risk is defined as the risk of loss to the Bank resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, resources, and systems and from external events. The Bank’s operations risk is controlled through a system of

51



internal controls designed to minimize the risk of operational losses. Also, the Bank has established and annually tests its business continuity plan under various business disruption scenarios involving offsite recovery and the testing of the Bank’s operations and information systems. In addition, an ongoing internal audit function audits significant risk areas to evaluate the Bank’s internal controls.

Concentration Risk

Concentration risk for the Bank is defined as the exposure to loss arising from a disproportionately large number of financial transactions with a limited number of individual customers or counterparties.

Advances. The following tables present the concentration in advances and the interest income (before the impact of interest rate exchange agreements associated with advances) from the advances to the Bank’s top five borrowers and their affiliates at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Concentration of Advances and Interest Income from Advances
Top Five Borrowers and Their Affiliates
Concentration of Advances and Interest Income from Advances
Top Five Borrowers and Their Affiliates
Concentration of Advances and Interest Income from Advances
Top Five Borrowers and Their Affiliates
              
(Dollars in millions)              
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2017December 31, 2017
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Advances
Outstanding

 Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances
(1)

 Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Charles Schwab Bank$15,000
 19% $40
 5%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
11,363
 15
 174
 19
First Republic Bank8,400
 11
 112
 12
MUFG Union Bank, National Association7,250
 9
 48
 5
Bank of the West$5,484
 14% $29
 7%6,409
 8
 87
 10
First Republic Bank5,275
 13
 86
 20
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:       
JPMorgan Bank & Trust Company, National Association3,000
 8
 54
 13
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
819
 2
 7
 2
Subtotal JPMorgan Chase & Co.3,819
 10
 61
 15
Bank of America California, N.A.3,500
 9
 18
 4
OneWest Bank, N.A.3,364
 9
 28
 6
Subtotal21,442
 55
 222
 52
48,422
 62
 461
 51
Others17,388
 45
 209
 48
29,064
 38
 438
 49
Total par value$38,830
 100% $431
 100%$77,486
 100% $899
 100%



51


December 31, 2013       
December 31, 2016       
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Bank of America California, N.A.$7,750
 18% $15
 3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:       
JPMorgan Bank & Trust Company, National Association5,125
 11
 76
 16
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
835
 2
 8
 2
$14,807
 30% $119
 23%
Subtotal JPMorgan Chase & Co.5,960
 13
 84
 18
Bank of the West7,305
 14
 49
 9
First Republic Bank5,150
 12
 70
 15
5,900
 12
 70
 13
Bank of the West4,933
 11
 30
 6
OneWest Bank, FSB4,501
 10
 41
 9
CIT Bank, N.A.2,411
 5
 28
 5
Star One Credit Union2,024
 4
 27
 5
Subtotal28,294
 64
 240
 51
32,447
 65
 293
 55
Others15,893
 36
 234
 49
17,410
 35
 240
 45
Total par value$44,187
 100% $474
 100%$49,857
 100% $533
 100%

(1)Interest income amounts exclude the interest effect of interest rate exchange agreements with derivative counterparties; as a result, the total interest income amounts will not agree to the Statements of Income. The amount of interest income from advances can vary depending on the amount outstanding, terms to maturity, interest rates, and repricing characteristics.
(2)Nonmember institution.

Because of this concentration in advances, the Bank may perform more frequent credit and collateral reviews for some of these institutions, including more frequent analysis of detailed data on pledged loan collateral to assess the credit quality and risk-based valuation of the loans. The Bank also analyzes the implications for its financial

52



management and profitability if it were to lose the advances business of one or more of these institutions or if the advances outstanding to one or more of these institutions were not replaced when repaid.

If these institutions were to prepay the advances (subject to the Bank’s limitations on the amount of advances prepayments from a single borrower in a day or a month) or repay the advances as they came due and no other advances were made to replace them, the Bank’s assets would decrease significantly and income could be adversely affected. The lossIn addition, because JPMorgan Chase is not a member of the Bank, it is not able to borrow new advances from the Bank or replace outstanding advances as they are repaid or prepaid, so a significant amount ofdecrease in advances could have a material adverse impact onoutstanding to JPMorgan Chase, if they are not replaced with advances to other members or other assets, will result in lower total assets and may result in lower net income for the Bank’s financial performance and dividend rate.Bank. The timing and magnitude of the impact would depend on a number of factors, including: (i) the amount of advances prepaid or repaid and the period over which the advances were prepaid or repaid, (ii) the amount and timing of any decreases in capital, (iii) the profitability of the advances, (iv) the size and profitability of the Bank’s investments, (v) the extent to which debt matured as the advances were prepaid or repaid, and (vi) the ability of the Bank to extinguish debt or transfer it to other FHLBanks and the costs to extinguish or transfer the debt. As discussed in “Item 1. Business – Our Business Model,” the Bank’s financial strategies are designed to enable it to expand and contract its assets, liabilities, and capital in view of changes in membership composition and member credit needs while striving to pay members a reasonable return on their investment in the Bank’s capital stock. Under the Bank’s capital plan, the Bank may repurchase some or all of a shareholder’s excess capital stock, andincluding any excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements.

MPF Program. The Bank had the following concentration in MPF loans with institutions whose outstanding total of mortgage loans sold to the Bank represented 10% or more of the Bank’s total outstanding mortgage loans at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.


52


Concentration of Mortgage Loans
              
(Dollars in millions)              
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2017       
Name of Institution
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding

Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding

Fremont Bank$1,145
 57% 2,121
 27%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
$570
 80% 6,269
 69%249
 12
 3,244
 40
OneWest Bank, N.A.84
 12
 2,124
 23
Subtotal654
 92
 8,393
 92
1,394
 69
 5,365
 67
Others59
 8
 731
 8
611
 31
 2,635
 33
Total$713
 100% 9,124
 100%$2,005
 100% 8,000
 100%
       
December 31, 2013       
Name of Institution
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
$715
 78% 7,355
 69%
OneWest Bank, FSB120
 13
 2,510
 23
Subtotal835
 91
 9,865
 92
Others78
 9
 883
 8
Total$913
 100% 10,748
 100%
December 31, 2016       
Name of Institution
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of 
Total
Mortgage
Loan Balances
Outstanding

 
Number of
Mortgage Loans
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total Number
of Mortgage 
Loans
Outstanding

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
$323
 40% 4,065
 59%
Bank of Hope(2)
132
 16
 319
 5
Fremont Bank99
 12
 211
 3
Kinecta Federal Credit Union90
 11
 167
 3
Subtotal644
 79
 4,762
 70
Others170
 21
 2,089
 30
Total$814
 100% 6,851
 100%

(1)Nonmember institution.
(2)Effective July 29, 2016, Wilshire Bank merged with and into BBCN Bank, which was renamed Bank of Hope.


53



Members that sell mortgage loans to the Bank through the MPF Program make representations and warranties that the loans comply with the MPF underwriting guidelines. In the event a mortgage loan does not comply with the MPF underwriting guidelines, the Bank’s agreement with the participating financial institution provides that the institution is required to repurchase the loan as a result of the breach of the institution’s representations and warranties. The Bank may, at its discretion, choose to retain the loan if the Bank determines that the noncompliance can be cured or mitigated through additional contract assurances from the institution or any successor. In addition, allmost participating financial institutions have retained the servicing on the mortgage loans purchased by the Bank, and the servicing obligation of any former participating financial institution is held by the successor or another Bank-approved financial institution. The FHLBank of Chicago (the MPF Provider and master servicer) has contracted with Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., to monitor the servicing performed by all participating financial institutions and successors, including JPMorgan Chase, National Association,Bank of Hope, Fremont Bank, and OneWest Bank, N.A.Kinecta Federal Credit Union. The Bank obtains a Type II Statement on Standards for Attestation Engagements (SSAE) No. 1618 service auditor's report to confirm the effectiveness of the MPF Provider's controls over the services it provides to the Bank, including its monitoring of the participating financial institutions’ servicing. The FHLBank of Chicago outsourced a portion of its infrastructure controls to a third party, and as a result, the Bank receives an additionalSSAE No. 18 service auditor’s report addressingaddresses the effectiveness of certain controls performed by the third party. The Bank has the right to transfer the servicing at any time, without paying the participating financial institution or any successor a servicing termination fee, in the event a participating financial institution or any successor does not meet the MPF servicing requirements. The Bank may also transfer servicing without cause subject to a servicing transfer fee payable to the participating financial institution or any successor.

Investments. The following table presents the portfolio concentration in the Bank’s investment portfolios at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, with U.S. government corporation and GSE issuers and other issuers (at the time of purchase), whose aggregate carrying values represented 10% or more of the Bank’s capital (including mandatorily redeemable capital stock). The amounts include securities issued by the issuer’s holding company, along with its affiliated companies. The Bank’s investment portfolio includes securities classified as trading, AFS, and HTM, and other assets such as securities purchased under agreements to resell, interest-bearing deposits, and Federal funds sold.

53
Investments: Portfolio Concentration

 2017 2016
(In millions)
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Non-MBS:       
Certificates of deposit       
Toronto Dominion Bank$
 $
 $600
 $600
Other(1)
500
 500
 750
 750
Total Certificates of deposit500
 500
 1,350
 1,350
Housing finance agency bonds:       
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds187
 178
 225
 207
GSEs:       
Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds1,158
 1,158
 2,058
 2,058
Total non-MBS1,845
 1,836
 3,633
 3,615
MBS:       
Other U.S. obligations:       
Ginnie Mae757
 757
 959
 963
GSEs:       
Freddie Mac6,690
 6,687
 4,349
 4,356
Fannie Mae5,731
 5,759
 6,095
 6,127
Total GSEs12,421
 12,446
 10,444
 10,483

54




Investments: Portfolio Concentration
Investments: Portfolio Concentration (continued)

Investments: Portfolio Concentration (continued)

       
2014 20132017 2016
(In millions)
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Non-MBS:       
Certificates of deposits(1)
$
 $
 $1,660
 $1,660
Housing finance agency bonds:       
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds328
 283
 416
 316
GSEs:       
Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds3,513
 3,513
 3,194
 3,194
Total non-MBS3,841
 3,796
 5,270
 5,170
MBS:       
Other U.S. obligations:       
Ginnie Mae(1)
1,524
 1,537
 1,589
 1,547
GSEs:       
Freddie Mac4,517
 4,566
 5,250
 5,213
Fannie Mae5,313
 5,428
 6,331
 6,395
Total GSEs9,830
 9,994
 11,581
 11,608
PLRMBS:              
Bank of America Corporation824
 820
 943
 938

 
 550
 548
Bear Stearns Companies Inc.667
 666
 
 

 
 528
 528
Countrywide Financial Corporation1,283
 1,282
 1,439
 1,437
665
 665
 802
 801
IndyMac Bank, F.S.B.1,121
 1,134
 1,254
 1,270
697
 705
 802
 811
Lehman Brothers Inc.1,376
 1,370
 1,580
 1,571
701
 701
 919
 916
UBS AG741
 736
 821
 814

 
 529
 526
Other(1)
2,239
 2,217
 3,285
 3,252
2,591
 2,591
 1,516
 1,505
Total PLRMBS8,251
 8,225
 9,322
 9,282
4,654
 4,662
 5,646
 5,635
Total MBS19,605
 19,756
 22,492
 22,437
17,832
 17,865
 17,049
 17,081
Total securities23,446
 23,552
 27,762
 27,607
19,677
 19,701
 20,682
 20,696
Securities purchased under agreements to resell:
              
Nomura Securities Intl., Inc.1,000
 1,000
 
 
Daiwa Capital Markets America, Inc.1,500
 1,500
 
 
Federal Reserve Bank of New York7,250
 7,250
 15,500
 15,500
HSBC Securities (USA), Inc.1,000
 1,000
 
 
Nomura Securities International, Inc.2,000
 2,000
 
 
Total Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 11,750
 15,500
 15,500
Federal funds sold:              
Australia & New Zealand Bank Group
 
 1,058
 1,058
1,725
 1,725
 1,033
 1,033
The Bank of New York Mellon1,033
 1,033
 
 
Bank of Nova Scotia744
 744
 
 
1,100
 1,100
 688
 688
Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ744
 744
 907
 907
1,108
 1,108
 
 
National Australia Bank
 
 907
 907
Nordea Bank Finland1,116
 1,116
 
 
1,000
 1,000
 
 
Rabobank Nederland744
 744
 
 
804
 804
 
 
Royal Bank of Canada744
 744
 
 
Toronto Dominion Bank868
 868
 1,058
 1,058
Other Federal funds sold(1)
2,543
 2,543
 3,568
 3,568
Societe Generale
 
 688
 688
Other(1)
4,258
 4,259
 1,805
 1,805
Total Federal funds sold7,503
 7,503
 7,498
 7,498
11,028
 11,029
 4,214
 4,214
Interest-bearing deposits       
Citibank, N.A.1,075
 1,075
 590
 590
Other(1)
40
 40
 
 
Total interest-bearing deposits1,115
 1,115
 590
 590
Total investments$31,949
 $32,055
 $35,260
 $35,105
$43,570
 $43,595
 $40,986
 $41,000

(1)Includes issuers of securities that have a carrying value that is less than 10% of total Bank capital (including mandatorily redeemable capital stock).


54


Many of the Bank’s members and their affiliates are extensively involved in residential mortgage finance. Accordingly, members or their affiliates may be involved in the sale of MBS to the Bank or in the origination or securitization of the mortgage loans backing the MBS purchased by the Bank.

Capital Stock. The following table presents the concentration in capital stock held by institutions whose capital stock ownership represented 10% or more of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of December 31, 20142017 or 2013.2016.


55



Concentration of Capital Stock
Including Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock
        
(Dollars in millions)2014 2013
Name of Institution
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

Citigroup Inc.:       
Citibank, N.A.(1)
$577
 14% $1,279
 23%
Banamex USA2
 
 1
 
Subtotal Citigroup Inc.579
 14
 1,280
 23
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:       
JPMorgan Bank & Trust Company, National Association268
 7
 594
 11
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
68
 2
 77
 1
Subtotal JPMorgan Chase & Co.336
 9
 671
 12
Subtotal915
 23
 1,951
 35
Others3,082
 77
 3,580
 65
Total$3,997
 100% $5,531
 100%
 2017 2016
Name of Institution
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

Charles Schwab Bank$405
 11% $81
 3%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
307
 9
 400
 14
Subtotal712
 20
 481
 17
Others2,840
 80
 2,346
 83
Total$3,552
 100% $2,827
 100%

(1)The capital stock held by thesethis nonmember institutionsinstitution is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

DerivativesDerivative Counterparties.The following table presents the concentration in derivatives with derivative counterparties whose outstanding notional balances represented 10% or more of the Bank’s total notional amount of derivatives outstanding as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

Concentration of Derivative Counterparties
                
(Dollars in millions)2014 20132017 2016
Derivative Counterparty
Credit  
Rating(1)  
 
Notional
Amount

 
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount

 
Credit  
Rating(1)  
 
Notional
Amount

 
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount

Credit  
Rating(1)  
 
Notional
Amount

 
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount

 
Credit  
Rating(1)  
 
Notional
Amount

 
Percentage of
Total
Notional Amount

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National AssociationA $7,439
 12% A $7,852
 10%
Morgan Stanley Capital ServicesBBB 6,957
 11
 BBB 8,362
 10
BNP ParibasA 4,471
 7
 A 7,808
 10
Subtotal 18,867
 30
 24,022
 30
Uncleared        
OthersAt least BBB 18,511
 30
 At least A 26,466
 32
At least BBB $13,900
 14% At least BBB $10,032
 15%
LCH Clearnet(2)
        
Subtotal uncleared 13,900
 14
 10,032
 15
Cleared        
LCH Ltd(2)
        
Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLCA 14,290
 23
 A 20,414
 25
A 54,371
 55
 A 30,548
 47
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLCA 31,322
 31
 A 20,994
 33
Deutsche Bank Securities Inc.A 10,629
 17
 A 10,668
 13

 
 
 BBB 3,482
 5
Subtotal 24,919
 40
 31,082
 38
Subtotal cleared 85,693
 86
 55,024
 85
Total(3) $62,297
 100% $81,570
 100% $99,593
 100% $65,056
 100%

55



(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lower of Moody'sMoody’s Investors Service (Moody’s) or Standard & Poor's ratings
S&P Global Ratings (S&P) ratings. 
(2)London Clearing House (LCH) ClearnetLtd is the Bank’s counterparty for all of its cleared swaps. For purposes of clearing swaps with LCH Ltd, Credit Suisse Securities (USA) LLC and Deutsche Bank Securities IncorporatedMorgan Stanley & Co. LLC are the Bank’s clearing agents, for purposesand Deutsche Bank Securities Incorporated was one of the Bank’s clearing swaps withagents until March 2017. LCH Clearnet. LCH Clearnet’sLtd’s parent, LCH Clearnet Group Ltd., isHoldings Limited, was rated A+ by S&P. On May 31, 2017, S&P lowered the rating to A and withdrew the rating at LCH Group Holdings Limited’s request. LCH Ltd’s ultimate parent, London Stock Exchange Group, plc., is rated A3 by Moody’s and A- by S&P.
(3)Total notional amount at December 31, 2017 and 2016, does not include $16 million and $13 million of mortgage delivery commitments with members, respectively.

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is defined as the risk that the Bank will be unable to meet its obligations as they come due or meet the credit needs of its members and eligible nonmember borrowers in a timely and cost-effective manner. The Bank is required to maintain liquidity for operating needs and for contingency purposes in accordance with Finance Agency regulations and guidelines and with the Bank's own Risk Management Policy. The Bank strives to maintain the liquidity necessary to meet member credit demands, repay maturing consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor, and meet other obligations and commitments.commitments, and meet expected and unexpected member credit demands. The Bank monitors its financial position in an effortorder to ensure that it hasmaintain ready access to sufficient liquid funds to meet normal transaction requirements, take advantage of appropriate investment opportunities, and cover unforeseen liquidity demands.


56



The Bank generally manages operational, contingent, and structural liquidity risks using a portfolio of cash and short-term investments—which include commercial paper, certificates of deposit, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and Federal funds sold to highly rated counterparties—investments and access to the debt capital markets. In addition, the Bank maintains alternate sources of funds, detailed in its contingent liquidity plan, which also includes an explanation of how sources of funds may be allocated under stressed market conditions.conditions, such as short-term operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance or short-term disruptions in the debt capital markets. The Bank maintains short-term, high-quality money market investments and government and agency securities in amounts that may average up to three times the Bank’s capital as a primary source of funds to satisfy these requirements and objectives.

The Bank maintainshas a regulatory contingent liquidity planrequirement to maintain at least 5 business days of liquidity to enable it to meet its obligations andwithout issuance of new consolidated obligations. In addition, the liquidity needs of members and housing associates in the event of short-term operational disruptions at the Bank or the Office of Finance or short-term disruptions in the debt capital markets. The Finance Agency has established liquidity guidelines that require each FHLBank to maintain sufficient on-balance sheet liquidity in an amount at least equal to its anticipated cash outflows for two different scenarios. Both scenarios both of which assume no capital markets accessnew consolidated obligation issuance and no reliance on repurchase agreements orand permit the sale of certain existing HTM and AFS investments.investments as determined by the Finance Agency. The two scenarios differ only in the treatment of maturing advances. One scenario assumes that the Bank does not renew any maturing advances. For this scenario, the Bank must have sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for 15 calendar days. The second scenario requires the Bank to renew maturing advances for certain members based on specific criteria established by the Finance Agency. For this scenario, the Bank must have sufficient liquidity to meet its obligations for 5 calendar days.

The Bank has a regulatory contingency liquidity requirement to maintain at least 5 business days of liquidity to enable it to meet its obligations without issuance of new consolidated obligations. In addition to the regulatory contingent liquidity requirement and the Finance Agency’s guidelines on contingent liquidity, the Bank’s asset-liability management committee has established an operational guideline for the Bank to maintain at least 90 days of liquidity to enable the Bank to meet its obligations in the event of a longer-term consolidated obligations market disruption. This operational guideline assumes that the Bank can obtain funds by using MBS and other eligible debt securities as collateral in the repurchase agreement markets. Under this guideline, the Bank maintained at least 90 days of liquidity at all times during 2014 and 2013. On a daily basis, the Bank models its cash commitments and expected cash flows for the next 90 dayson a daily basis to determine its projected liquidity position. If a market or operational disruption occurred that prevented the issuance of new consolidated obligation bonds or discount notes through the capital markets,obligations, the Bank could meet its obligations by: (i) allowing short-term liquid investments to mature, (ii) using eligible securities as collateral for repurchase agreement borrowings, and (iii) if necessary, allowing advances to mature without renewal. In addition, the Bank may be able to borrow on a short-term unsecured basis from other financial institutions (Federal funds purchased) or other FHLBanks (inter-FHLBank borrowings).

The Bank actively monitors and manages the structural liquidity risks, of the advances business segment, which the Bank defines as maturity mismatches greater than 90 days for sources and uses of funds.funds, of the advances business segment. Structural liquidity

56


maturity mismatches are identified using maturity gap analysis and valuation sensitivity metrics that quantify the risk associated with the Bank’s structural liquidity position.

The following table shows the Bank’s principal financial obligations due, estimated sources of funds available to meet those obligations, and the net difference between funds available and funds needed for the 5-business-day and 90-day periodsperiod following December 31, 20142017 and 2013. Also shown are additional contingent sources of funds from on-balance sheet collateral available for repurchase agreement borrowings.2016.

Principal Financial Obligations Due and Funds Available for Selected Periods
Principal Financial Obligations Due and Funds Available for Selected PeriodPrincipal Financial Obligations Due and Funds Available for Selected Period
          
As of December 31, 2014 As of December 31, 2013As of December 31, 2017 As of December 31, 2016
(In millions)
5 Business
Days

 90 Days
 
5 Business
Days

 90 Days
5 Business Days 5 Business Days
Obligations due:          
Demand deposits$845
 $845
 $590
 $590
$299
 $184
Maturing member term deposits
 
 
 1
Loans from other FHLBanks
 1,345
Discount note and bond maturities and expected exercises of bond call options2,420
 24,730
 4,203
 23,509
3,950
 2,412
Subtotal obligations due3,265
 25,575
 4,793
 24,100
4,249
 3,941
Sources of available funds:          
Maturing investments8,155
 9,305
 3,577
 9,387
21,613
 19,175
Cash at Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco3,919
 3,919
 4,905
 4,905
Available cash27
 1
Proceeds from scheduled settlements of discount notes and bonds3
 3
 1,625
 1,640
635
 1,346
Maturing advances and scheduled prepayments4,837
 11,142
 4,974
 11,191
7,854
 7,121
Subtotal sources of available funds16,914
 24,369
 15,081
 27,123
30,129
 27,643
Net funds available13,649
 (1,206) 10,288
 3,023
$25,880
 $23,702
Additional contingent sources of funds:(1)
       
Estimated borrowing capacity of securities available for repurchase agreement borrowings:       
MBS
 16,643
 
 19,574
FFCB bonds3,443
 3,149
 3,130
 3,052
Subtotal contingent sources of funds3,443
 19,792
 3,130
 22,626
Total contingent funds available$17,092
 $18,586
 $13,418
 $25,649

(1)The estimated amount of repurchase agreement borrowings obtainable from authorized securities dealers is subject to market conditions and the ability of securities dealers to obtain financing for the securities transactions entered into with the Bank. The estimated maximum amount of repurchase agreement borrowings obtainable is based on the current par amount and estimated market value of MBS and other investments (not included in above figures) that are not pledged at the beginning of the period and is subject to estimated collateral discounts taken by securities dealers.
57




In addition, Section 11(i) of the FHLBank Act authorizes the U.S. Treasury to purchase certain obligations issued by the FHLBanks aggregating not more than $4.0 billion under certain conditions. There were no such purchases by the U.S. Treasury during the two-year period ended December 31, 2014.2017.

Credit Risk

Credit risk is defined as the risk that the market value, or estimated fair value if market value is not available, of an obligation will decline as a result of deterioration in the creditworthiness of the obligor. The Bank further refines the definition of credit risk as the risk that a secured or unsecured borrower is unable to meet its financial obligations and the Bank is inadequately protected by the liquidation value of collateral, if any, which could result in a credit loss to the Bank.

Advances. The Bank manages the credit risk of advances and other credit products by setting the credit and collateral terms available to individual members and housing associates based on their creditworthiness and on the

57


quality and value of the assets they pledge as collateral. The Bank also has procedures to assess the mortgage loan quality and documentation standards of institutions that pledge mortgage loan collateral. In addition, the Bank has collateral policies and restricted lending procedures in place to help manage its exposure to institutions that experience difficulty in meeting their capital requirements or other standards of creditworthiness. These credit and collateral policies balance the Bank’s dual goals of meeting the needs of members and housing associates as a reliable source of liquidity and mitigating credit risk by adjusting credit and collateral terms in view of deterioration in creditworthiness. The Bank has never experienced a credit loss on an advance.

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to a member or housing associate based on the institution’s creditworthiness and eligible collateral pledged in accordance with the Bank’s credit and collateral policies and regulatory requirements. The Bank may review and change the maximum amount and maximum term at any time. The maximum amount a member or housing associate may borrow is also limited by the amount and type of collateral pledged because all advances must be fully collateralized.

To identify the credit strength of each borrower and potential borrower, other than insurance companies, community development financial institutions (CDFIs), and housing associates, the Bank assigns each member and each nonmember borrower an internal credit quality rating from one to ten, with one as the highest credit quality rating. These ratings are based on results from the Bank’s credit model, which considers financial, regulatory, and other qualitative information, including regulatory examination reports. The internal ratings are reviewed on an ongoing basis using current available information and are revised, if necessary, to reflect the institution’s current financial position. Credit and collateral terms may be adjusted based on the results of this credit analysis.

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to an insurance company based on an ongoing risk assessment that considers the member's financial and regulatory standing and other qualitative information deemed relevant by the Bank. This evaluation results in the assignment of an internal credit quality rating from one to ten, with one as the highest credit quality rating. Approved terms are designed to meet the needs of the individual member while mitigating the unique credit and collateral risks associated with insurance companies, including risks related to the resolution process for insurance companies, which is significantly different from the resolution processes established for the Bank’s insured depository members.

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to a CDFI based on an ongoing risk assessment that considers information from the CDFI’s audited annual financial statements, supplemented by additional information deemed relevant by the Bank. Approved terms are designed to meet the needs of the individual member while mitigating the unique credit and collateral risks of CDFIs, which do not file quarterly regulatory financial reports and are not subject to the same inspection and regulation requirements as the Bank’s insured depository members.


58


Table of Contents

The Bank determines the maximum amount and maximum term of the advances it will make to a housing associate based on an ongoing risk assessment that considers the housing associate’s financial and regulatory standing and other qualitative information deemed relevant by the Bank. Approved terms are designed to meet the needs of the individual housing associate while mitigating the unique credit and collateral risks of housing associates, which do not file quarterly regulatory financial reports and are not subject to the same inspection and regulation requirements as the Bank’s insured depository members.

The Bank underwrites and actively monitors the financial condition and performance of all borrowers to determine and periodically assess creditworthiness. The Bank uses, to the extent available, financial information provided by the borrower, quarterly financial reports filed by borrowers with their primary regulators, regulatory examination reports and known regulatory enforcement actions, and public information. In determining creditworthiness, the Bank considers available examination findings, performance trends and forward-looking information, the borrower's business model, changes in risk profile, capital adequacy, asset quality, profitability, interest rate risk, supervisory history, the results of periodic collateral field reviews conducted by the Bank, the risk profile of the collateral, and the amount of eligible collateral on the borrower's balance sheet.


58

Table of Contents

In accordance with the FHLBank Act, borrowers may pledge the following eligible assets to secure advances: one- to four-family first lien residential mortgage loans; multifamily mortgage loans; MBS; securities issued, insured, or guaranteed by the U.S. government or any of its agencies, including without limitation MBS backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae; cash or deposits in the Bank; and certain other real estate-related collateral, such as commercial real estate loans and second lien residential mortgage loans or home equity loans. The Bank may also accept small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and vehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) added secured loans for community development activities as collateral that the Bank may accept from community financial institutions. The Housing Act defined community financial institutions as depository institutions insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation with average total assets over the preceding three-year period of $1 billion or less, to be adjusted for inflation annually by the Finance Agency. The average total asset cap for 20142017 was $1,108$1,148 million.

Under the Bank’s written lending agreements with its borrowers, its credit and collateral policies, and applicable statutory and regulatory provisions, the Bank has the right to take a variety of actions to address credit and collateral concerns, including calling for the borrower to pledge additional or substitute collateral (including ineligible collateral) at any time that advances are outstanding to the borrower, and requiring the delivery of all pledged collateral. In addition, if a borrower fails to repay any advance or is otherwise in default on its obligations to the Bank, the Bank may foreclose on and liquidate the borrower’s collateral and apply the proceeds toward repayment of the borrower’s obligations to the Bank. The Bank’s collateral policies are designed to address changes in the value of collateral and the risks and costs relating to foreclosure and liquidation of collateral, and the Bank periodically adjusts the amount it is willing to lend against various types of collateral to reflect these factors. Market conditions, the volume and condition of the borrower’s collateral at the time of liquidation, and other factors could affect the amount of proceeds the Bank is able to realize from liquidating a borrower’s collateral. In addition, the Bank could sell collateral over an extended period of time, rather than liquidating it immediately, and the Bank would have the right to receive principal and interest payments made on the collateral it continued to hold and apply those proceeds toward repayment of the borrower’s obligations to the Bank.

The Bank perfects its security interest in securities collateral by taking delivery of all securities at the time they are pledged. The Bank perfects its security interest in loan collateral by filing a UCC-1 financing statement for each borrower that pledges loans. The Bank may also require delivery of loan collateral under certain conditions (for example, from a newly formed institution or when a borrower's creditworthiness deteriorates below a certain level). In addition, the FHLBank Act provides that any security interest granted to the Bank by any member or member affiliate has priority over the claims and rights of any other party, including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar entity that has the rights of a lien creditor, unless these claims and rights would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law or are held by bona fide purchasers for value or by parties that have actual perfected security interests.

59


Table of Contents


Pursuant to the Bank’s lending agreements with its borrowers, the Bank limits extensions of credit to individual borrowers to a percentage of the market value or unpaid principal balance of the borrower’s pledged collateral, known as the borrowing capacity. The borrowing capacity percentage varies according to several factors, including the charter type of the institution, the collateral type, the value assigned to the collateral, the results of the Bank’s collateral field review of the borrower’s collateral, the pledging method used for loan collateral (specific identification or blanket lien), the amount of loan data provided (detailed or summary reporting), the data reporting frequency (monthly or quarterly), the borrower’s financial strength and condition, and any institution-specific collateral risks. Under the terms of the Bank’s lending agreements, the aggregate borrowing capacity of a borrower’s pledged eligible collateral must meet or exceed the total amount of the borrower’s outstanding advances, other extensions of credit, and certain other borrower obligations and liabilities. The Bank monitors each borrower’s aggregate borrowing capacity and collateral requirements on a daily basis by comparing the institution’s borrowing capacity to its obligations to the Bank.

In addition, the total amount of advances made available to each member or housing associate may be limited by the financing availability assigned by the Bank, which is generally expressed as a percentage of the member’s or

59

Table of Contents

housing associate’s assets. The amount of financing availability is generally determined by the creditworthiness of the member or housing associate.

When a nonmember financial institution acquires some or all of the assets and liabilities of a member, including outstanding advances and Bank capital stock, the Bank may allow the advances to remain outstanding, at its discretion. The nonmember borrower is required to meet the Bank’s applicable credit, collateral, and capital stock requirements, including requirements regarding creditworthiness and collateral borrowing capacity.

The following tables present a summary of the status of the credit outstanding and overall collateral borrowing capacity of the Bank’s member and nonmember borrowers as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016. During 20142017, the Bank’s internal credit ratings stayed the same or improved for the majority of members and nonmember borrowers.

Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Credit Quality Rating
Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Credit Quality Rating
Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Credit Quality Rating
                  
(Dollars in millions)                  
December 31, 2014         
December 31, 2017         
All Members and
Nonmembers
 Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
All Members and
Nonmembers
 Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
      
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
      
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
Number
 Number
 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 Total
 Used
Number
 Number
 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 Total
 Used
1-3254
 157
 $38,375
 $166,407
 23%265
 155
 $84,257
 $240,247
 35%
4-685
 38
 5,746
 19,753
 29
58
 25
 9,255
 22,005
 42
7-1010
 4
 46
 71
 65
4
 1
 
 25
 
Subtotal349
 199
 44,167
 186,231
 24
327
 181
 93,512
 262,277
 36
CDFIs5
 3
 77
 92
 84
6
 4
 78
 99
 79
Housing associates2
 1
 107
 112
 96
Total354
 202
 $44,244
 $186,323
 24%335
 186
 $93,697
 $262,488
 36%
         
December 31, 2013         
All Members and
Nonmembers
 Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
      
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
Number
 Number
 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 Total
 Used
1-3224
 135
 $37,451
 $141,076
 27%
4-6119
 60
 10,269
 21,969
 47
7-1017
 5
 44
 133
 33
Total360
 200
 47,764
 163,178
 29
CDFIs4
 2
 30
 37
 81
Total364
 202
 $47,794
 $163,215
 29%
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.


60


Table of Contents

Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Unused Borrowing Capacity
      
(Dollars in millions)     
December 31, 2014     
Unused Borrowing Capacity
Number of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding

 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)

0% – 10%10
 $3,178
 $3,331
11% – 25%7
 181
 226
26% – 50%18
 11,693
 21,584
More than 50%167
 29,192
 161,182
Total202
 $44,244
 $186,323
      
December 31, 2013     
Unused Borrowing Capacity
Number of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding

 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)

0% – 10%3
 $42
 $44
11% – 25%13
 4,805
 5,983
26% – 50%23
 13,862
 21,433
More than 50%163
 29,085
 135,755
Total202
 $47,794
 $163,215
December 31, 2016         
 
All Members and
Nonmembers
 Members and Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
       
Collateral Borrowing Capacity(2)
Member or Nonmember
Credit Quality Rating
Number
 Number
 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 Total
 Used
1-3266
 155
 $55,290
 $181,405
 30%
4-662
 28
 9,662
 22,606
 43
7-103
 2
 17
 46
 37
Subtotal331
 185
 64,969
 204,057
 32
CDFIs6
 3
 60
 82
 73
Housing associates2
 1
 10
 16
 63
Total339
 189
 $65,039
 $204,155
 32%
 
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.

Total collateral borrowing capacity increased in 2014 because of improvement in collateral values and member credit quality.
Member and Nonmember Credit Outstanding and Collateral Borrowing Capacity
by Unused Borrowing Capacity
      
(Dollars in millions)     
December 31, 2017     
Unused Borrowing Capacity
Number of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding

 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)

0% – 10%4
 $160
 $169
11% – 25%4
 553
 672
26% – 50%35
 33,571
 54,487
More than 50%143
 59,413
 207,160
Total186
 $93,697
 $262,488
December 31, 2016     
Unused Borrowing Capacity
Number of Members and Nonmembers with
Credit Outstanding

 
Credit
Outstanding(1)

 
Collateral
Borrowing
Capacity(2)

0% – 10%2
 $26
 $27
11% – 25%9
 1,791
 2,261
26% – 50%30
 33,096
 52,503
More than 50%148
 30,126
 149,364
Total189
 $65,039
 $204,155
(1)Includes advances, letters of credit, the market value of swaps, estimated prepayment fees for certain borrowers, and the credit enhancement obligation on MPF loans.
(2)Collateral borrowing capacity does not represent any commitment to lend on the part of the Bank.

Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, the Bank’s credit analyses of borrowers’ financial condition, and the Bank’s credit extension and collateral policies, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the advances. Therefore, no allowance for credit losses on advances is deemed necessary by the Bank. The Bank has never experienced any credit losses on advances.

Securities pledged as collateral are assigned borrowing capacities that reflect the securities’ pricing volatility and market liquidity risks. Securities are delivered to the Bank’s custodian when they are pledged. The Bank prices securities collateral on a daily basis or twice a month, depending on the availability and reliability of external pricing sources. Securities that are normally priced twice a month may be priced more frequently in volatile market conditions. The Bank benchmarks the borrowing capacities for securities collateral to the market on a periodic basis and may review and change the borrowing capacity for any security type at any time. As of December 31, 20142017, the

61


Table of Contents

borrowing capacities assigned to U.S. Treasury and agency securities ranged from 55%75% to 99%98% of their market value. The borrowing capacities assigned to private-label MBS, which must be rated AAA or AA when initially pledged, generally ranged from 55%65% to 80%85% of their market value, depending on the underlying collateral (residential mortgage loans, home equity loans, or commercial real estate loans), the rating, and the subordination structure of the respective securities.

The following table presents the securities collateral pledged by all members and by nonmembers with credit outstanding at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

61

Table of Contents

Composition of Securities Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
              
(In millions)2014 20132017 2016
Securities Type with Current Credit RatingsCurrent Par
 
Borrowing
Capacity

 Current Par
 
Borrowing
Capacity

Current Par
 
Borrowing
Capacity

 Current Par
 
Borrowing
Capacity

U.S. Treasury (bills, notes, bonds)$461
 $472
 $484
 $481
$1,946
 $1,875
 $2,377
 $2,315
Agency (notes, subordinated debt, structured notes, indexed amortization notes, and Small Business Administration pools)3,541
 3,474
 3,156
 3,059
3,135
 3,019
 3,147
 3,063
Agency pools and collateralized mortgage obligations8,696
 8,379
 10,029
 9,543
34,182
 32,755
 8,986
 8,559
PLRMBS – publicly registered investment-grade-rated senior tranches2
 1
 4
 1

 
 1
 
Private-label commercial MBS – publicly registered AAA-rated subordinated tranches
 
 83
 68
Term deposits with the Bank
 
 1
 1
Private-label commercial MBS – publicly registered investment-grade-rated senior tranches3
 2
 
 
PLRMBS – private placement investment-grade-rated senior tranches68
 51
 83
 62
Municipal Bonds – investment-grade-rated55
 49
 61
 55
Total$12,700
 $12,326
 $13,757
 $13,153
$39,389
 $37,751
 $14,655
 $14,054

With respect to loan collateral, most borrowers may choose to pledge loan collateral by specific identification or under a blanket lien. Insurance companies, CDFIs, and housing associates are required to pledge loan collateral by specific identification with monthly reporting. All other borrowers pledging by specific identification must provide a detailed listing of all the loans pledged to the Bank on a monthly or quarterly basis. With a blanket lien, a borrower generally pledges the following loan types, whether or not the individual loans are eligible to receive borrowing capacity: all loans secured by real estate; all loans made for commercial, corporate, or business purposes; and all participations in these loans. Borrowers pledging under a blanket lien may provide a detailed listing of loans or may use a summary reporting method.

The Bank may require certain borrowers to deliver pledged loan collateral to the Bank for one or more reasons, including the following: the borrower is a de novo institution (chartered within the last three years), an insurance company, a CDFI, or a housing associate; the Bank is concerned about the borrower’s creditworthiness; or the Bank is concerned about the maintenance of its collateral or the priority of its security interest. With the exception of insurance companies, CDFIs, and housing associates, borrowers required to deliver loan collateral must pledge those loans under a blanket lien with detailed reporting. The Bank’s largest borrowers are required to report detailed data on a monthly basis and may pledge loan collateral using either the specific identification method or the blanket lien method with detailed reporting.

As of December 31, 20142017, of the loan collateral pledged to the Bank, 40%24% was pledged by 3327 institutions by specific identification, 43%52% was pledged by 143121 institutions under a blanket lien with detailed reporting, and 17%24% was pledged by 108126 institutions under a blanket lien with summary reporting.

The Bank monitors each borrower’s borrowing capacity and collateral requirements on a daily basis. The borrowing capacities for loan collateral reflect the assigned value of the collateral and a margin for the costs and risks of liquidation. The Bank reviews the margins for loan collateral regularly and may adjust them at any time as market conditions change.


62


Table of Contents

The Bank assigns a value to loan collateral using one of two methods. For mortgage loans that are reported to the Bank with detailed information on the individual loans, the Bank uses third-party pricing vendors to price all the loans on a quarterly basis. The third-party vendors use proprietary analytical tools to calculate the value of each loan. The vendors model the future performance of each individual loan and generate the monthly cash flows given the current loan characteristics and applying specific market assumptions. The value of each loan is determined based on the present value of those cash flows after being discounted by the current market yields commonly used by buyers of these types of loans. The current market yields are derived by the third-party pricing vendors from

62

Table of Contents

prevailing conditions in the secondary market. For mortgage loans pledged under a blanket lien with summary reporting, the Bank establishes a standard market value for each collateral type based on quarterly pricing results.

For each borrower that pledges loan collateral, the Bank conducts loan collateral field reviews once every six months or every one, two, or three years, depending on the risk profile of the borrower and the types of collateral pledged by the borrower. During the borrower's collateral field review, the Bank examines a statistical sample of the borrower's pledged loans to validate loan ownership, confirm the existence of the critical legal documents, identify documentation and servicing deficiencies, and verify eligibility. Based on any loan defects identified in the pool of sample loans, the Bank determines the applicable non-credit secondary market discounts. The Bank also sends the sample loans to a third-party pricing vendor for valuation of the financial and credit-related attributes of the loans. The Bank adjusts the borrower's borrowing capacity for each collateral type in its pledged portfolio based on the pricing of the field review sample loans and the non-credit secondary market discounts identified in the field review.

As of December 31, 20142017, the Bank’s maximum borrowing capacities as a percentage of the assigned market value of mortgage loan collateral pledged under a blanket lien with detailed reporting were as follows: 92%90% for first lien residential mortgage loans, 91%88% for multifamily mortgage loans, 88% for commercial mortgage loans, and 82%77% for second lien residential mortgage loans. The maximum borrowing capacity for small business, small agribusiness, and small farm loans was 50% of the unpaid principal balance, although most of these loans are pledged under blanket lien with summary reporting, with a maximum borrowing capacity of 25%. The highest borrowing capacities are available to borrowers that pledge under a blanket lien with detailed reporting because the detailed loan information allows the Bank to assess the value of the collateral more precisely and because additional collateral is pledged under the blanket lien that may not receive borrowing capacity but may be liquidated to repay advances in the event of default. The Bank may review and change the maximum borrowing capacity for any type of loan collateral at any time.

The table below presents the mortgage loan collateral pledged by all members and by nonmembers with credit outstanding at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.
 
Composition of Loan Collateral Pledged
by Members and by Nonmembers with Credit Outstanding
              
(In millions)2014 20132017 2016
Loan Type
Unpaid Principal
Balance

 
Borrowing
Capacity

 
Unpaid Principal
Balance

 
Borrowing
Capacity

Unpaid Principal
Balance

 
Borrowing
Capacity

 
Unpaid Principal
Balance

 
Borrowing
Capacity

First lien residential mortgage loans$106,467
 $90,942
 $98,377
 $78,992
$162,740
 $138,937
 $124,257
 $107,775
Second lien residential mortgage loans and home equity lines of credit29,133
 14,997
 31,344
 8,968
22,440
 12,500
 23,238
 13,302
Multifamily mortgage loans20,820
 17,366
 21,162
 17,131
26,143
 20,098
 23,191
 19,082
Commercial mortgage loans54,707
 39,144
 47,780
 32,326
68,703
 48,759
 62,586
 44,802
Loan participations(1)
13,141
 10,698
 16,540
 11,843
4,793
 3,487
 5,450
 4,375
Small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans3,123
 776
 2,956
 709
3,830
 956
 3,016
 765
Other106
 74
 135
 93
2
 
 
 
Total$227,497
 $173,997
 $218,294
 $150,062
$288,651
 $224,737
 $241,738
 $190,101


63


Table of Contents

(1)The unpaid principal balance for loan participations is 100% of the outstanding loan amount. The borrowing capacity for loan participations is based on the participated amount pledged to the Bank.

The Bank holds a security interest in subprime residential mortgage loans pledged as collateral. Subprime loans are defined as loans with a borrower FICO score of 660 or less at origination, or if the original FICO score is not available, as loans with a current borrower FICO score of 660 or less. At December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, the unpaid principal balance of these loans totaled $149 billion and $14$9 billion, respectively. The Bank reviews and assigns borrowing capacities to subprime mortgage loans as it does for all other types of loan collateral, taking into account the known credit attributes in the pricing of the loans. All advances, including those made to borrowers pledging

63

Table of Contents

subprime mortgage loans, are required to be fully collateralized. The Bank limits the amount of borrowing capacity that may be supported by subprime collateral.

MPF Program. Under the MPF Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and FHA/VA-insuredFHA-insured or VA-guaranteed mortgage loans from members for the Bank’s own portfolio under the Original MPF and MPF Government products.product. In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra product and of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product.

As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank had approved four23 members as participating financial institutions and had purchased $4 million in eligible loans under the Original MPF product since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in the fourth quarter of 2013.

From May 2002 through October 2006, the Bank purchased conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from its participating financial institutions members under the MPF Original MPF and MPF Plus products. The participating financial institutionsParticipating members originated or purchased the mortgage loans, credit-enhanced them and sold them to the Bank, and generally retained the servicing of the loans. Unlike conventional MPF products held for portfolio, under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, MPF Government, and MPF Government MBS products, participating financial institutions are not required to provide credit enhancement and do not receive credit enhancement fees. When members sell mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the loans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition.

The Bank and any participating financial institution share in the credit risk of the loans sold by that institution under the MPF Original and MPF Plus products as specified in a master agreement. LoansAs of December 31, 2017, loans purchased under the MPF Program generally havehad a credit risk exposure at the time of purchase that, as determined by the MPF Program methodology, would be expected from an equivalent to assetsinvestment rated AA if purchased prior to April 2017, or rated BBB if purchased since April 2017, taking into consideration the credit risk sharing structure mandated by the Finance Agency’s acquired member assets (AMA) regulation. The MPF Program structures potential credit losses on conventional MPF loans into layers with respect to each pool of loans purchased by the Bank under a single master commitment, as follows:

1.The first layer of protection against loss is the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan.
2.The next layer of protection comes from the primary mortgage insurance that is required for loans with an initial loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%, if still in place.
3.Losses that exceed the liquidation value of the real property and any primary mortgage insurance, up to an agreed-upon amount called the first loss account for each master commitment, are incurred by the Bank.
4.Losses in excess of the first loss account for each master commitment, up to an agreed-upon amount called the “credit enhancement amount,” are covered by the participating financial institution's credit enhancement obligation at the time losses are incurred.
5.Losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution's remaining credit enhancement for the master commitment, if any, are incurred by the Bank.


64


Table of Contents

The first loss account provided by the Bank is a memorandum account, a record-keeping mechanism the Bank uses to track the amount of potential expected losses for which it is liable on each master commitment (before the participating financial institution's credit enhancement is used to cover losses).

TheAs of December 31, 2017, the credit enhancement amount for each master commitment, together with any primary mortgage insurance coverage, iswas sized to limit the Bank’s credit losses in excess of the first loss account to those that would be expected on an equivalent investment with a long-term credit rating of AA at the time of purchase,for loans purchased prior to April 2017 and BBB for loans purchased thereafter, as determined by the MPF Program methodology. As required by the AMA regulation, a nationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) confirms that the MPF Program methodology would provide an analysis of each master commitment that was “comparable to a methodology that the NRSRO would use in determining credit enhancement levels when conducting a rating review of the asset or pool of assets in a securitization transaction.” By requiring credit enhancement in the amount determined by the MPF Program methodology, the Bank expects to have the same probability of incurring credit losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution's credit enhancement obligation on mortgage loans purchased under any master commitment as an investor would have of incurring credit losses on an equivalent investment with a corresponding long-term credit rating of AA.rating.

Before delivering loans for purchase under the MPF Program, each participating financial institution submits data on the individual loans to the FHLBank of Chicago, which calculates the loan level credit enhancement needed. The

64

Table of Contents

rating agency model used considers many characteristics, such as loan-to-value ratio, property type, loan purpose, borrower credit scores, level of loan documentation, and loan term, to determine the loan level credit enhancement. The resulting credit enhancement amount for each loan purchased is accumulated under a master commitment to establish a pool level credit enhancement amount for the master commitment.

The Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio currently consists of mortgage loans purchased under two MPF products: MPF Original MPF and MPF Plus, which differ from each other in the way the amount of the first loss account is determined, the options available for covering the participating financial institution's credit enhancement obligation, and the fee structure for the credit enhancement fees.

Under MPF Original, MPF, the first loss account accumulates over the life of the master commitment. Each month, the outstanding aggregate principal balance of the loans at monthend is multiplied by an agreed-upon percentage (typically 4 basis points per annum), and that amount is added to the first loss account. As credit and special hazard losses are realized that are not covered by the liquidation value of the real property or primary mortgage insurance, they are first charged to the Bank, with a corresponding reduction of the first loss account for that master commitment up to the amount accumulated in the first loss account at that time. Over time, the first loss account may cover the expected credit losses on a master commitment, although losses that are greater than expected or that occur early in the life of the master commitment could exceed the amount accumulated in the first loss account. In that case, the excess losses would be charged next to the member's credit enhancement to the extent available. The Bank had de minimis losses in 2014, 2013, and 2012 on the sale of real estate owned (REO) property acquired as a result of foreclosure on MPF Original loans. The Bank recovered all losses through available credit enhancement fees, except for de minimis losses in excess of available credit enhancement on the sale of one property in 2013 and one property in 2012. For each master commitment, the Bank considers the credit performance, credit enhancement levels, and the NRSROnationally recognized statistical rating organization (NRSRO) rating equivalent as determined under the MPF Program methodology, in the determination of its risk-based capital requirements, and the credit performance, collateral protection, and availability of credit enhancement in the evaluation of appropriate loan loss allowances.

The aggregate first loss account for all participating financial institutions for MPF Original MPF totaled $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012.2015.

The participating financial institution’s credit enhancement obligation under MPF Original MPF must be collateralized by the participating financial institution in the same way that advances from the Bank are collateralized, as described under “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Advances.” For taking on the credit enhancement obligation, the Bank pays the participating financial institution a monthly credit enhancement fee, typically 10 basis points per annum, calculated on the unpaid principal balance of the loans in the master commitment. A participating financial institution may elect to receive credit enhancement fees monthly over the life of the loans or in an upfront lump sum amount that is included in the purchase price at the time the loans are sold to the Bank. The lump sum amount is approximately equivalent to the present value of the monthly credit enhancement fees that the Bank would otherwise be expected to pay over the life of the loans. In both cases, the Bank charges this amountcredit enhancement fees to interest income, which

65


Table of Contents

effectively reducingreduces the overall yield earned on the loans purchased by the Bank. The Bank reduced net interest income for credit enhancement fees that are paid monthly totaling $0.1$0.5 million in 20142017, $0.1$0.2 million in 20132016, and $0.1 million in 20122015 for MPF Original MPF loans.

Under MPF Plus, the first loss account is equal to a specified percentage of the scheduled principal balance of loans in the pool as of the sale date of each loan. The percentage of the first loss account was negotiated for each master commitment. The participating financial institution provides credit enhancement for loans sold to the Bank under MPF Plus by maintaining a supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) policy that equals its credit enhancement obligation. The amount of required credit enhancement is recalculated annually. Because the MPF Plus product provides that the requirement may only be reduced (and not increased), the SMI coverage could be reduced as a result of the annual recalculation of the required credit enhancement.

Typically, the amount of the first loss account is equal to the deductible on the SMI policy. However, the SMI policy does not cover special hazard losses or credit losses on loans with a loan-to-value ratio below a certain percentage (usually 50%). As a result, credit losses on loans not covered by the SMI policy and special hazard losses may reduce the amount of the first loss account without reducing the deductible on the SMI policy. If the deductible on the SMI policy has not been met and the pool incurs credit losses that exceed the amount of the first

65

Table of Contents

loss account, those losses will be allocated to the Bank until the SMI policy deductible has been met. Once the deductible has been met, the SMI policy will cover credit losses on loans covered by the policy up to the maximum loss coverage provided by the policy. If the SMI provider's claims-paying ability rating falls below a specified level, the participating financial institution has six months to either replace the SMI policy or assume the credit enhancement obligation and fully collateralize the obligation; otherwise the Bank may choose not to pay the participating financial institution its performance-based credit enhancement fee. Finally, the Bank will absorb credit losses that exceed the maximum loss coverage of the SMI policy (or the substitute credit enhancement provided by the participating financial institution), all credit losses on loans not covered by the policy, and all special hazard losses, if any.

Three of the six master commitments (totaling $0.5$0.3 billion) continue to rely on SMI coverage for a portion of their credit enhancement obligation, which is provided by two SMI companies and totals $17 million.$9.4 million after the deductible. The claims-paying ability ratings of these two SMI companies are below the AA rating required for the program; both areone is rated BB–.BB+ and the other is rated BBB-. The participating financial institutions associated with the relevant master commitments have chosen to forego their performance-based credit enhancement fees rather than assume the credit enhancement obligation. The largest of the commitments (totaling $0.50.2 billion) did not achieve AA credit equivalency, as determined by the MPF Program methodology, solely because the SMI company was rated BB–BB+.

At December 31, 20142017, the deductibles under the SMI policies totaled approximately 28%35% of the participating financial institutions’ credit enhancement obligation on MPF Plus loans. At December 31, 20132016, the deductibles under the SMI policies totaled approximately 23%35% of the participating financial institutions’ credit enhancement obligation on MPF Plus loans. None of the SMI was provided by participating financial institutions or their affiliates at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

The first loss account for MPF Plus for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 20122015 was as follows:

First Loss Account for MPF Plus
          
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$10
 $11
 $12
$8
 $9
 $10
Amount accumulated during the period
 (1) (1)
Losses incurred in excess of liquidation value of the real property securing the loan and primary mortgage insurance
 (1) (1)
Balance, end of the period$10
 $10
 $11
$8
 $8
 $9


66


Table of Contents

Under MPF Plus, the Bank pays the participating financial institution a credit enhancement fee that is divided into a fixed credit enhancement fee and a performance-based credit enhancement fee. The fixed credit enhancement fee is paid each month beginning with the month after each loan delivery. The performance-based credit enhancement fee accrues monthly beginning with the month after each loan delivery and is paid to the member beginning 12 months later. Performance-based credit enhancement fees payable to the member are reduced by an amount equal to loan losses, up to the full amount of the first loss account established for each master commitment. If losses up to the full amount of the first loss account, net of previously withheld performance-based credit enhancement fees, exceed the credit enhancement fee payable in any period, the excess will be carried forward and applied against future performance-based credit enhancement fees. Because loans in the MPF Plus program have experienced a high rate of voluntary prepayments, causing the current balance of each respective master commitment to be significantly reduced since purchase, it is possible that the remaining loans will not generate enough performance-based credit enhancement fees over the remaining life of each master commitment to enable the Bank to collect performance-based credit enhancement fees equal to the full amount of the first loss account established for each MPF Plus master commitment. The amount of performance-based credit enhancement fees expected to be accrued in the future is uncertain and highly dependent on the future rate of principal prepayments of the underlying mortgage loans. The Bank reduced net interest income for credit enhancement fees totaling $0.4$0.2 million in 2014, $0.62017, $0.3 million in 2013,2016, and $0.9$0.3 million in 20122015 for MPF Plus loans. The Bank’s liability for performance-based credit enhancement fees for MPF Plus was $0.1 million and $0.1 millionde minimis at December 31, 20142017 and 2013, respectively.2016.
 

66

Table of Contents

The Bank provides for a loss allowance, net of the credit enhancement, for any impaired loans and for the estimates of other probable losses, and the Bank has policies and procedures in place to monitor the credit risk. The Bank bases the allowance for credit losses for the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio on its estimate of probable credit losses in the portfolio as of the Statements of Condition date.

Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank implemented the accounting requirements of regulatory Advisory Bulletin 2012-02. As a result, for any mortgage loans that are more than 180 days past due and that have any outstanding balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less cost to sell, this excess is charged off as a loss by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Likewise, when a borrower is in bankruptcy, loans are written down to the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, in general within 60 days of receipt of the notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, unless it can be clearly demonstrated and documented that repayment is likely to occur. As a result of these charge-offs, the corresponding Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans, which had previously provided for most of these expected losses, was reduced accordingly.

Mortgage Loans Evaluated at the Individual Master Commitment Level – The credit risk analysis of all conventional MPF loans is performed at the individual master commitment level to determine the credit enhancements available to recover losses on MPF loans under each individual master commitment.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans – Certain conventional mortgage loans, primarily impaired mortgage loans that are considered collateral-dependent, may be specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for credit losses. The estimated credit losses on impaired collateral-dependent loans may be separately determined because sufficient information exists to make a reasonable estimate of the inherent loss on those loans on an individual loan basis. The Bank estimates the fair value of collateral using real estate broker price opinions or automated valuation models based on property characteristics as well as recent market sales and current listings. The resulting incurred loss, if any, is equal to the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans – The credit risk analysis of conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment considers loan pool-specific attribute data, applies estimated loss severities, and considers the associated credit enhancements to determine the Bank's best estimate of probable incurred losses. The analysis includes estimating projected cash flows that the Bank is likely to collect based on an assessment of all available information, including prepayment speeds, default rates, and loss severity of the mortgage loans based on underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics; expected housing price changes; and interest rate assumptions. In performing a detailed cash flow analysis, the Bank develops its best estimate of the cash flows

67


Table of Contents

expected to be collected using a third-party model to project prepayments, default rates, and loss severities based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the mortgage loans, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. The assumptions used as inputs to the model, including the forecast of future housing price changes, are consistent with assumptions used for the Bank's evaluation of its PLRMBS for OTTI.

The Bank performs periodic reviews of its mortgage loan portfolio to identify the probable credit losses in the portfolio and to determine the likelihood of collection ofon the loans in the portfolio. The overall allowance is determined by an analysis that includes consideration of observable data such as delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, collectability of credit enhancements from members or from mortgage insurers, and prevailing economic conditions, taking into account the credit enhancement provided by the member under the terms of each master commitment.

The amounts of charge-offs and recoveries of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio forwere de minimis during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017 and 2012, was as follows:

Allowance for Credit Losses on Mortgage Loan Portfolio
      
(Dollars in millions)2014
 2013
 2012
Balance, beginning of the period$2
 $3
 $6
(Charge-offs)/recoveries(1) 
 (2)
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses
 (1) (1)
Balance, end of the period$1
 $2
 $3
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period(0.05)% (0.07)% (0.08)%
2016. Net charge-offs of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio were $2 during the year ended December 31, 2015.

The continued decline in the estimated allowance for credit losses during 20142017 is primarily due to gradually improving property valuesa decline in the balance of the seasoned portion of mortgage loans, originated between 2002 and 2006, as well as a decline in serious delinquencies in mortgage loans purchased subsequent to 2013 and continuing improvements in the economy and the charge-off of realized losses on liquidated loans.housing market.

67

Table of Contents


The allowance for credit losses and recorded investment by impairment methodology for individually and collectively evaluated impaired loans are as follows:

(In millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Allowance for credit losses, end of the period   
Allowance for credit losses, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$1
 $2
$
 $
Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
Total allowance for credit losses$1
 $2
$
 $
Recorded investment, end of the period   
Recorded investment, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$20
 $27
$9
 $12
Collectively evaluated for impairment692
 884
2,078
 818
Total recorded investment$712
 $911
$2,087
 $830

The recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment are as follows:

2014 20132017 2016
(In millions)Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
With no related allowance$14
 $14
 $
 $20
 $20
 $
$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $
With an allowance6
 6
 1
 7
 7
 2

 
 
 
 
 
Total$20
 $20
 $1
 $27
 $27
 $2
$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $

The average recorded investment on impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:

(In millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
With no related allowance$17
 $19
$10
 $12
With an allowance7
 11

 
Total$24
  $30
$10
  $12

68


Table of Contents


For the three MPF Plus master commitments that still rely on SMI for a portion of their credit enhancement obligation, the external ratings of the SMI providers have declined since the loans were purchased. Because the relevant participating financial institutions have elected not to assume the credit enhancement obligations as their own, the Bank has discontinued paying the associated performance-based credit enhancement fees, in accordance with the terms of the applicable agreements. Formerly, upon a realized loss, the Bank would have withheld credit enhancement fees up to the amount of the SMI deductible to offset the loss. Because these fees are no longer owed to the participating financial institutions, they cannot be withheld to offset a loss. Instead, the Bank is accounting for the performance-based credit enhancement fees as income and has now begun to directly recognize the potential loan losses in the related loan loss allowance account.

For more information on how the Bank determines its estimated allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, see “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates – Allowance for Credit Losses – Mortgage Loans Acquired Under the MPF Program” and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses.”

A mortgage loan is considered to be impaired when it is reported 90 days or more past due (nonaccrual) or when it is probable, based on current information and events, that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement.


68

Table of Contents

The following table presents information on delinquent mortgage loans as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

Mortgage Loan Delinquencies
      
2014
 2013
2017

2016
(Dollars in millions)
Recorded
Investment(1)

 
Recorded
Investment(1)

Recorded
Investment(1)

 
Recorded
Investment(1)

30 – 59 days delinquent$12
 $14
$8
 $7
60 – 89 days delinquent5
 7
2
 3
90 days or more delinquent22
 27
12
 15
Total past due39
 48
22
 25
Total current loans673
 863
2,065
 805
Total mortgage loans$712
 $911
$2,087
 $830
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$11
 $17
$3
 $5
Nonaccrual loans$22
 $27
$12
 $15
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$
 $
$
 $
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(3)
3.12% 3.00%0.59% 1.79%

(1)The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.
(2)Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(3)
Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure as a percentage of the recorded investment of total mortgage loans outstanding.The ratio increased primarily because of the decline in the recorded investment of the Bank’s mortgage loans.

For 20142017, 20132016, and 2012,2015, the interest on nonaccrual loans that was contractually due and recognized in income was as follows:


69


Table of Contents

Interest on Nonaccrual Loans
          
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Interest contractually due on nonaccrual loans during the period$1
 $1
 $2
$1
 $1
 $1
Interest recognized in income for nonaccrual loans during the period
 
 

 
 
Shortfall$1
 $1
 $2
$1
 $1
 $1

Delinquencies amounted to 5.54%1.11% of the total loans in the Bank’s portfolio as of December 31, 20142017, and 5.27%3.12% of the total loans in the Bank’s portfolio as of December 31, 20132016. The increasedecline in the delinquency ratiopercentage was primarily due to the declinepurchase of new loans in the mortgage loan portfolio balance because of principal repayments.2017 as well as declining delinquencies during 2017. The weighted average age of the Bank’s MPF portfolio was 13536 months as of December 31, 20142017, and 12487 months as of December 31, 20132016.

Troubled Debt Restructurings Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to the debtor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor's financial difficulties and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. An MPF loan considered a TDR is individually evaluated for impairment when determining its related allowance for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by factoring in expected cash flow shortfalls incurred as of the reporting date as well as the economic loss attributable to delaying the original contractual principal and interest due dates, if applicable.

The Bank’s TDRs of MPF loans primarily involve modifying the borrower's monthly payment for a period of up to 36 months to reflect a housing expense ratio that is no more than 31% of the borrower's qualifying monthly income. The outstanding principal balance is re-amortized to reflect a principal and interest payment for a term not to exceed

69

Table of Contents

40 years from the original note date and a housing expense ratio not to exceed 31%. This would result in a balloon payment at the original maturity date of the loan because the maturity date and number of remaining monthly payments are not adjusted. If the 31% ratio is still not achieved through re-amortization, the interest rate is reduced in 0.125% increments below the original note rate, to a floor rate of 3%, resulting in reduced principal and interest payments, for the temporary payment modification period of up to 36 months, until the 31% housing expense ratio is met.

The recorded investment of the Bank’s nonperforming MPF loans classified as TDRs totaled $2.3$3 million as of December 31, 2014,2017, and $0.8$3 million as of December 31, 2013.2016. During2014 2017 and 2013,2016, the difference between the pre- and post-modification recorded investment in TDRs that occurred during the year was de minimis. None of the MPF loans classified as TDRs within the previous 12 months experienced a payment default.

At December 31, 20142017, the Bank’s other assets included $2.5$1 million of REOreal estate owned (REO) resulting from the foreclosure of 2311 mortgage loans held by the Bank. At December 31, 20132016, the Bank’s other assets included $2.7$1 million of REO resulting from the foreclosure of 2712 mortgage loans held by the Bank.

Investments. The Bank has adopted credit policies and exposure limits for investments that promote risk limitation, diversification, and liquidity. These policies determine eligible counterparties and restrict the amounts and terms of the Bank’s investments with any given counterparty according to the Bank’s own capital position as well as the capital and creditworthiness of the counterparty.

The Bank monitors its investments for substantive changes in relevant market conditions and any declines in fair value. For securities in an unrealized loss position because of factors other than movements in interest rates, such as widening of mortgage asset spreads, the Bank considers whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security by comparing the best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected from the security with the amortized cost basis of the security. If the Bank’s best estimate of the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, the difference is considered the credit loss.

When the fair value of an individual investment security falls below its amortized cost, the Bank evaluates whether the decline is other than temporary. The Bank recognizes an OTTI when it determines that it will be unable to

70


Table of Contents

recover the entire amortized cost basis of the security and the fair value of the investment security is less than its amortized cost. The Bank considers its intent to hold the security and whether it is more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell the security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining cost basis, and other factors. The Bank generally views changes in the fair value of the securities caused by movements in interest rates to be temporary.

On November 8, 2013, the Finance Agency issued a final rule implementing Section 939A of the Dodd-Frank Act, which requires Federal agencies to remove provisions from their regulations that require the use of ratings issued by nationally recognized statistical rating organizations. The final rule requires the Bank to make a determination of credit quality with respect to its investments, but does not prevent the Bank from using nationally recognized statistical rating organization ratings or other third-party analysis in its credit determinations. The final rule became effective on May 7, 2014.

The following tables present the Bank’s investment credit exposure at the dates indicated, based on the lowest of the long-term credit ratings provided by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s,S&P, or comparable Fitch Ratings (Fitch) ratings.


70
Investment Credit Exposure
              
(In millions)             
December 31, 2017             
  Carrying Value
 
Credit Rating(1)
    
Investment TypeAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Non-MBS             
Certificates of deposit$
 $
 $500
 $
 $
 $
 $500
Housing finance agency bonds:             
CalHFA bonds
 
 187
 
 
 
 187
GSEs:             
FFCB bonds
 1,158
 
 
 
 
 1,158
Total non-MBS
 1,158
 687
 
 
 
 1,845
MBS:             
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:             
Ginnie Mae
 757
 
 
 
 
 757
GSEs – single-family:             
Freddie Mac
 2,039
 
 
 
 
 2,039
Fannie Mae(2)

 3,588
 7
 
 5
 
 3,600
Subtotal
 5,627
 7
 
 5
 
 5,639
GSEs – multifamily:             
Freddie Mac
 4,651
 
 
 
 
 4,651
Fannie Mae
 2,131
 
 
 
 
 2,131
Subtotal

6,782









6,782
Total GSEs
 12,409
 7
 
 5
 
 12,421
PLRMBS:             
Prime
 
 12
 200
 642
 31
 885
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 834
 
 834
Alt-A, other2
 13
 12
 57
 2,549
 302
 2,935
Total PLRMBS2
 13
 24
 257
 4,025
 333
 4,654
Total MBS2
 13,179
 31
 257
 4,030
 333
 17,832
Total securities2
 14,337
 718
 257
 4,030
 333
 19,677
Interest-bearing deposits
 40
 1,075
 
 
 
 1,115
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 11,750
 
 
 
 
 11,750
Federal funds sold(3)

 5,283
 5,745
 
 
 
 11,028
Total investments$2
 $31,410
 $7,538
 $257
 $4,030
 $333
 $43,570



71


Table of Contents

Investment Credit Exposure
              
(In millions)             
December 31, 2014             
  Carrying Value
 
Credit Rating(1)
    
Investment TypeAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Non-MBS             
Housing finance agency bonds:             
CalHFA bonds$
 $
 $303
 $25
 $
 $
 $328
GSEs:             
FFCB bonds
 3,513
 
 
 
 
 3,513
Total non-MBS
 3,513
 303
 25
 
 
 3,841
MBS:             
Other U.S. obligations:             
Ginnie Mae
 1,524
 
 
 
 
 1,524
GSEs:             
Freddie Mac
 4,517
 
 
 
 
 4,517
Fannie Mae
 5,282
 19
 
 12
 
 5,313
Total GSEs
 9,799
 19
 
 12
 
 9,830
PLRMBS:             
Prime
 
 3
 384
 1,336
 2
 1,725
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 1,079
 
 1,079
Alt-A, other10
 1
 76
 187
 5,171
 2
 5,447
Total PLRMBS10
 1
 79
 571
 7,586
 4
 8,251
Total MBS10
 11,324
 98
 571
 7,598
 4
 19,605
Total securities10
 14,837
 401
 596
 7,598
 4
 23,446
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 1,000
 
 
 
 
 1,000
Federal funds sold(2)

 3,528
 3,929
 46
 
 
 7,503
Total investments$10
 $19,365
 $4,330
 $642
 $7,598
 $4
 $31,949



71

Table of Contents

(In millions)                          
December 31, 2013             
December 31, 2016             
Carrying ValueCarrying Value
Credit Rating(1)
   
Credit Rating(1)
   
Investment TypeAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
AAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Non-MBS                          
Certificates of deposit$
 $360
 $1,300
 $
 $
 $
 $1,660
$
 $600
 $750
 $
 $
 $
 $1,350
Housing finance agency bonds:            
            
CalHFA bonds
 
 110
 306
 
 
 416

 
 225
 
 
 
 225
GSEs:                          
FFCB bonds
 3,194
 
 
 
 
 3,194

 2,058
 
 
 
 
 2,058
Total non-MBS
 3,554
 1,410
 306
 
 
 5,270

 2,658
 975
 
 
 
 3,633
MBS:                          
Other U.S. obligations:             
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:             
Ginnie Mae
 1,589
 
 
 
 
 1,589

 959
 
 
 
 
 959
GSEs:             
GSEs – single-family:             
Freddie Mac
 5,250
 
 
 
 
 5,250

 2,793
 
 
 
 
 2,793
Fannie Mae(2)
 6,286
 27
 
 18
 
 6,331

 5,020
 10
 
 7
 
 5,037
Subtotal
 7,813
 10
 
 7
 
 7,830
GSEs – multifamily:             
Freddie Mac
 1,556
 
 
 
 
 1,556
Fannie Mae
 1,058
 
 
 
 
 1,058
Subtotal
 2,614
 
 
 
 
 2,614
Total GSEs
 11,536
 27
 
 18
 
 11,581

 10,427
 10
 
 7
 
 10,444
PLRMBS:                          
Prime
 
 3
 498
 1,554
 2
 2,057

 1
 1
 295
 842
 2
 1,141
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 1,115
 
 1,115

 
 
 
 897
 
 897
Alt-A, other12
 2
 116
 311
 5,707
 2
 6,150
5
 15
 17
 128
 3,440
 3
 3,608
Total PLRMBS12
 2
 119
 809
 8,376
 4
 9,322
5
 16
 18
 423
 5,179
 5
 5,646
Total MBS12
 13,127
 146
 809
 8,394
 4
 22,492
5
 11,402
 28
 423
 5,186
 5
 17,049
Total securities12
 16,681
 1,556
 1,115
 8,394
 4
 27,762
5
 14,060
 1,003
 423
 5,186
 5
 20,682
Federal funds sold(2)

 3,773
 3,686
 39
 
 
 7,498
Interest-bearing deposits
 
 590
 
 
 
 590
Securities purchased under agreements to resell
 15,500
 
 
 
 
 15,500
Federal funds sold(3)

 1,576
 2,585
 53
 
 
 4,214
Total investments$12
 $20,454
 $5,242
 $1,154
 $8,394
 $4
 $35,260
$5
 $31,136
 $4,178
 $476
 $5,186
 $5
 $40,986

(1)Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.
(2)
The Bank has one security guaranteed by Fannie Mae but rated D by S&P because of extraordinary expenses incurred during bankruptcy of the security's sponsor.
(3)Includes $300$225 million and $100$130 million at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively, in Federal funds sold to a member counterparty determined by the Bank to have an internal credit rating equivalent to an AA+AA rating.

For all securities in its AFS and HTM portfolios, for Federal funds sold, and for securities purchased under agreements to resell, the Bank does not intend to sell any security and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell any security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis.

The Bank invests in short-term unsecured interest-bearing deposits, short-term unsecured Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and negotiable certificates of deposit with member and nonmember counterparties, all of which are highly rated.

Bank policies set forth the capital and creditworthiness requirements for member and nonmember counterparties for unsecured credit. All Federal funds counterparties (members and nonmembers) must be federally insured financial institutions or domestic branches of foreign commercial banks. In addition, for any unsecured credit line, a member counterparty must have at least $100 million in Tier 1 capital (as defined by the applicable regulatory agency) or tangible capital and a nonmember must have at least $250 million in Tier 1 capital (as defined by the applicable regulatory agency) or tangible capital. The general unsecured credit policy limits are as follows:


72


72


Unsecured Credit Policy Limits
            
 
Unsecured Credit Limit Amount
(Lower of Percentage of Bank Capital
or Percentage of Counterparty Capital)
   
Unsecured Credit Limit Amount
(Lower of Percentage of Bank Capital
or Percentage of Counterparty Capital)
  
Long-Term
Credit Rating(1)
 
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Outstanding Term(2)

 
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Total Outstanding

 
Maximum
Investment
Term (Months)

Long-Term
Credit Rating(1)
 
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Outstanding Term(2)

 
Maximum
Percentage Limit
for Total Outstanding

 
Maximum
Investment
Term (Months)

Member counterpartyAAA 15% 30% 9
AAA 15% 30% 3
AA 14
 28
 6
AA 14
 28
 3
A 9
 18
 3
A 9
 18
 3
BBB 
 6
 Overnight
BBB 
 6
 Overnight
Nonmember counterpartyAAA 15
 20
 9
AAA 15
 30
 3
AA 14
 18
 6
AA 14
 28
 3
A 9
 12
 3
A 9
 18
 3

(1)Long-term credit ratings are based on the lowest of Moody’s, Standard & Poor's, or comparable Fitch ratings. Other comparable agency scores may also be used by the Bank.
(2)Term limit applies to unsecured extensions of credit excluding Federal funds transactions with a maturity of one day or less and Federal funds subject to a continuing contract.
(1) Long-term credit ratings are based on the lowest of Moody’s, S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. The Bank also uses other similar standards, such as the
Bank’s internal credit quality rating, to determine maximum limits to members and nonmembers. If a member is not rated by an NRSRO, the Bank will
determine the applicable credit rating by using the Bank’s credit quality rating and may provide overnight unsecured credit to that member.
(2) Term limit applies to unsecured extensions of credit excluding Federal funds transactions with a maturity of one day or less and Federal funds subject to a
continuing contract.

The Bank’s unsecured investment credit limits and terms for member counterparties may be less restrictive than for nonmember counterparties because the Bank has access to more information about members to assist in evaluating the member counterparty credit risk.

The Bank actively monitors its credit exposures and the credit quality of its counterparties, including an assessment of each counterparty’s financial performance, capital adequacy, likelihood of parental or sovereign support, and the current market perceptions of the counterparties. The Bank may also consider general macroeconomic and market conditions and political stability when establishing limits on unsecured investments with U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. As a result of deteriorating financial condition or concerns about adverse economic or market developments, the Bank may reduce limits or terms on unsecured investments or suspend a counterparty.

Finance Agency regulations limit the amount of unsecured credit that an individual FHLBank may extend to a single counterparty. This limit is calculated with reference to a percentage of either the FHLBank’s or the counterparty’s capital and to the counterparty’s overall credit rating. Under these regulations, the lesser of the FHLBank’s total regulatory capital or the counterparty’s Tier 1 capital is multiplied by a percentage specified in the regulation. The percentages used to determine the maximum amount of term extensions of unsecured credit range from 1% to 15%, depending on the counterparty’s overall credit rating. Term extensions of unsecured credit include on-balance sheet transactions, off-balance sheet commitments, and derivative transactions, but exclude overnight Federal funds sales, even if subject to a continuing contract. (See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Derivative Counterparties” for additional information related to derivatives exposure.)

Finance Agency regulations also permit the FHLBanks to extend additional unsecured credit to the same single counterparty for overnight sales of Federal funds, even if subject to a continuing contract. However, an FHLBank’s total unsecured credit to a single counterparty (total term plus additional overnight Federal funds unsecured credit) may not exceed twice the regulatory limit for term exposures (2% to 30% of the lesser of the FHLBank’s total regulatory capital or the counterparty’s Tier 1 capital, based on the counterparty’s overall credit rating). In addition, the FHLBanks are prohibited by Finance Agency regulation from investing in financial instruments issued by non-U.S. entities other than those issued by U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.

Under Finance Agency regulations, the total amount of unsecured credit that an FHLBank may extend to a group of affiliated counterparties for term extensions of unsecured credit and overnight Federal funds sales, combined, may

73


Table of Contents

not exceed 30% of the FHLBank’s total capital. These limits on affiliated counterparty groups are in addition to the limits on extensions of unsecured credit applicable to any single counterparty within the affiliated group.

As ofThe following table presents the unsecured credit exposure with counterparties by investment type at December 31, 2014, the Bank’s unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks was limited to Federal funds sold, which represented 93%2017 of the Bank’s total unsecured investment credit exposure in Federal funds sold.and 2016.
Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Investment Type
    
 
Carrying Value(1)

(In millions)2017
 2016
Interest-bearing deposits$1,115
 $590
Certificates of deposit500
 1,350
Federal funds sold11,028
 4,214
Total$12,643
 $6,154

(1)
Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2017 and 2016.

The following table presents the credit ratings of the unsecured investment credit exposures presented by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty’s parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks, based on the lowest of the credit ratings provided by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s,S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. This table does not reflect the foreign sovereign government’s credit rating. At December 31, 20142017, 47%42% of the carrying value of unsecured investments held by the Bank were rated AA.AA, and 76% of the Bank’s total unsecured investments were to U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks.

Ratings of Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Domicile of Counterparty
            
(In millions)            
December 31, 2014       
December 31, 2017     
Carrying Value(1)
Carrying Value(1)
Credit Rating(2)
  
Credit Rating(2)
 
Domicile of CounterpartyAA
 A
 BBB
  Total
AA
 A
 Total
Domestic(3)
$300
 $145
 $46
  $491
$1,298
 $1,763
 $3,061
U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks
 
 
  

 
 
Total domestic and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks300
 145
 46
 491
1,298
 1,763
 3,061
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:             
Australia500
 
 
 500
1,975
 
 1,975
Austria
 650
 650
Canada1,612
 1,739
 
  3,351
550
 1,350
 1,900
Finland1,116
 
 
 1,116
France
 100
 100
Japan
 1,301
 
 1,301

 1,608
 1,608
Netherlands
 744
 
 744

 804
 804
Norway
 345
 345
Singapore500
 
 500
Sweden1,000
 
 1,000
Switzerland
 500
 500
United Kingdom
 200
 200
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks3,228
 3,784
 
 7,012
4,025
 5,557
 9,582
Total unsecured credit exposure$3,528
 $3,929
 $46
  $7,503
$5,323
 $7,320
 $12,643

(1)
Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 20142017.
(2)
Does not reflect changes in ratings, outlook, or watch status occurring after December 31, 20142017. These ratings represent the lowest rating available for each securityunsecured investment owned by the Bank, based on the ratings provided by Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s,S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. The Bank’s internal rating may differ from this rating.

74


Table of Contents

(3)
Includes $300$225 million at December 31, 2017, in Federal funds sold to a member counterparty determined by the Bank to have an internal credit rating equivalent to an AA+AA rating.

As of December 31, 2014,The following table presents the contractual maturity of the Bank’s unsecured investment credit exposure was 2 days through 30 days.by the domicile of the counterparty or the domicile of the counterparty’s parent for U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. At December 31, 2017, 76% of the carrying value of unsecured investments held by the Bank had overnight maturities.
Contractual Maturity of Unsecured Investment Credit Exposure by Domicile of Counterparty
        
(In millions)       
December 31, 2017       
  
Carrying Value(1)
Domicile of CounterpartyOvernight
 Due 2 Days Through 30 Days
 Due 31 Days Through 90 Days
 Total
Domestic$3,061
 $
 $
 $3,061
U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks
 
 
 
Total domestic and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks3,061
 
 
 3,061
U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks:       
Australia1,225
 300
 450
 1,975
Austria400
 
 250
 650
Canada1,400
 
 500
 1,900
France100
 
 
 100
Japan1,108
 
 500
 1,608
Netherlands804
 
 
 804
Norway345
 
 
 345
Singapore
 
 500
 500
Sweden1,000
 
 
 1,000
Switzerland
 
 500
 500
United Kingdom200
 
 
 200
Total U.S. branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks6,582
 300
 2,700
 9,582
Total unsecured credit exposure$9,643
 $300
 $2,700
 $12,643

(1)
Excludes unsecured investment credit exposure to U.S. government agencies and instrumentalities, government-sponsored enterprises, and supranational entities and does not include related accrued interest as of December 31, 2017.

The Bank’s investments may also include housing finance agency bonds issued by housing finance agencies located in Arizona, California, and Nevada, the three states that make up the Bank’s district. These bonds are federally taxable mortgage revenue bonds, (federally taxable), are collateralized by pools of first lien residential mortgage loans and are credit-enhanced by bond insurance. The bonds held by the Bank are issued by the California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) and insured by either Ambac Assurance Corporation (Ambac), National Public Financial Guarantee (formerly MBIA Insurance Corporation), or Assured Guaranty Municipal Corporation (formerly Financial Security Assurance Incorporated). At December 31, 20142017, all of the bonds were rated at least BBBA by Moody’s or Standard & Poor’sS&P.

For the Bank’s investments in housing finance agency bonds, which were issued by CalHFA, the gross unrealized losses were mainly due to an illiquid market, credit concerns regarding the underlying mortgage collateral, and credit concerns regarding the monoline insurance providers, causing these investments to be valued at a discount to

74


their acquisition cost. The Bank independently modeled cash flows for the underlying collateral, using assumptions for default rates and loss severity that a market participant would deem reasonable, and concluded that the available credit support within the CalHFA structure more than offset the projected underlying collateral losses. The Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, all of the gross unrealized losses on the CalHFA bonds are temporary because the underlying collateral and credit enhancements were sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a

75



result, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. If conditions in the housing and mortgage markets and general business and economic conditions deteriorate, the fair value of the CalHFA bonds may decline further and the Bank may experience OTTI in future periods.

The Bank’s MBS investments include PLRMBS, all of which were AAA-rated at the time of purchase, and
agency residential MBS, which are backed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae. Some of the PLRMBS were issued by and/or purchased from members, former members, or their affiliates. The Bank has investment credit limits and terms for these investments that do not differ for members and nonmembers. Regulatory policy limits total MBS investments to three times the Bank’s capital at the time of purchase. At December 31, 20142017, the Bank’s MBS portfolio was 307%257% of Bank capital (as determined in accordance with regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks). The Bank is precluded from purchasing additional MBS investments until its MBS portfolio declines below 300%has not purchased any PLRMBS since the first quarter of Bank capital, but the Bank is not required to sell any previously purchased MBS. The Bank was in compliance with the regulatory limit at the time of its MBS purchases.2008.

The Bank executes all MBS investments without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the investment as a nonmember, member, or affiliate of a member. When the Bank executes non-MBS investments with members, the Bank may give consideration to their secured credit availability and the Bank’s advances price levels.

The Bank has not purchased any PLRMBS since the first quarter of 2008, and current Bank policy prohibits the purchase of PLRMBS.

At December 31, 20142017, PLRMBS representing 33%20% of the amortized cost of the Bank’s MBS portfolio were labeled Alt-A by the issuer. These PLRMBS are generally collateralized by mortgage loans that are considered less risky than subprime loans but more risky than prime loans. These loans are generally made to borrowers with credit scores that are high enough to qualify for a prime mortgage loan, but the loans may not meet standard underwriting guidelines for documentation requirements, property type, or loan-to-value ratios.

As of December 31, 20142017, the Bank’s investment in MBS had gross unrealized losses totaling $28077 million, most of which were related to PLRMBS. These gross unrealized losses were primarily due to illiquidity in the MBS market uncertainty about the future condition of the housing and mortgage markets and the economy, and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, causingwhich caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their acquisitionamortized cost.

For its agency MBS, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities because the Bank determined that the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, all of the gross unrealized losses on its agency MBS are temporary.

In 2009, the FHLBanks formed the OTTI Governance Committee (OTTI Committee), which consists of one representative from each FHLBank. The OTTI Committee is responsible for reviewing and approving the key modeling assumptions, inputs, and methodologies to be used by the FHLBanks to generate the cash flow projections used in analyzing credit losses and determining OTTI for all PLRMBS and for certain home equity loan investments, including home equity asset-backed securities. Certain private-label MBS backed by multifamily and commercial real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, and manufactured housing loans are outside the scope of the FHLBanks' OTTI Committee and are analyzed for OTTI by each individual FHLBank owning securities backed by such collateral. The Bank does not have any home equity loan investments or any private-label MBS backed by multifamily or commercial real estate loans, home equity lines of credit, or manufactured housing loans.


75

Table of Contents

The Bank’s evaluation of its PLRMBS for OTTI includes estimating projected cash flows that the Bank is likely to collect based on an assessment of all available information about each security on an individual basis, the structure of the security, and certain assumptions approved by the FHLBanks' OTTI Committee and by the Bank. These assumptions may include the remaining payment terms for the security, prepayment speeds, default rates, loss severity on the collateral supporting the security based on underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics, expected housing price changes, and interest rate assumptions. In performing a detailed cash flow analysis, the Bank develops its best estimate of the cash flows expected to be collected. If this estimate results in a present value of expected cash flows (discounted at the security's effective yield) that is less than the amortized cost basis of the security, the security is considered to have incurred a credit-related OTTI.

To assess whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of its PLRMBS, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for all of its PLRMBS as of December 31, 20142017, using two third-party models. The first model projects prepayments, default rates, and loss severities onFHLBanks’ OTTI Committee developed a short-term housing price forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 5.0% to an increase of 12.0% over the underlying collateral based on borrower characteristics and12-month period beginning October 1, 2017. For the particular attributesvast majority of markets, the loans underlying the Bank’s securities, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. A significant input to the first model is the forecast of futureprojected short-term housing price changes range from an increase of 2.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for the relevant states and core-based statistical areas (CBSAs), which areeach geographic area based on an assessment of the regional housing markets. CBSA refers collectively to metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. As currently defined, a CBSA must contain at least one urban area with a population of 10,000 or more people.internally developed framework derived from historical data.

The month-by-month projections of future loan performance derived from the first model, which reflect projected prepayments, default rates, and loss severities, are then input into a second model that allocates the projected loan level cash flows and losses to the various security classes in each securitization structure in accordance with the structure’s prescribed cash flow and loss allocation rules. When the credit enhancement for the senior securities in a securitization is derived from the presence of subordinated securities, losses are generally allocated first to the subordinated securities until their principal balance is reduced to zero. The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of these models can vary significantly with changes in assumptions and expectations. The scenario of cash flows determined based on the model approach described above reflects a best-estimate scenario and includes a base case housing price forecast that reflects the expectations for near- and long-term housing price behavior.

The FHLBanks’ OTTI Committee developed a short-term housing price forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 4.0% to an increase of 7.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2014. For the vast majority of markets, the projected short-term housing price changes range from a decrease of 1.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for each geographic area based on an internally developed framework derived from historical data.

In addition to evaluating its PLRMBS under a base case (or best estimate) scenario, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for each of these securities under a more adverse housing price scenario. This more adverse scenario was primarily based on a short-term housing price forecast that was five percentage points below the base case forecast, followed by a recovery path with annual rates of housing price growth that were 33.0% lower than the base case.

The following table shows the base case scenario and what the credit-related OTTI loss would have been under the more adverse housing price scenario at December 31, 20142017:


76


Table of Contents

OTTI Analysis Under Base Case and Adverse Case Scenarios
                   
Housing Price ScenarioHousing Price Scenario
Base Case Adverse CaseBase Case Adverse Case
(Dollars in millions)
Number of
Securities
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Number of
Securities
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

Number of
Securities

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Number of
Securities

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:                   
Prime4 $119
 $(1) 4 $119
 $(3)
Alt-A, other10 207
 
 12 313
 (2)5
 $144
 $(1) 8
 $186
 $(2)
Total14 $326
 $(1) 16 $432
 $(5)5
 $144
 $(1) 8
 $186
 $(2)

(1)
Amounts are for the three months ended December 31, 20142017.

For more information on the Bank’s OTTI analysis and reviews, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

The following table presents the ratings of the Bank’s PLRMBS as of December 31, 20142017, by collateral type at origination and by year of securitization.

Unpaid Principal Balance of PLRMBS by Year of Securitization and Credit Rating
                          
(In millions)                          
December 31, 2014            
December 31, 2017December 31, 2017            
Unpaid Principal BalanceUnpaid Principal Balance
Credit Rating(1) 
   
Credit Rating(1) 
   
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of SecuritizationAAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
AAA
 AA
 A
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Prime                          
2008$
 $
 $
 $
 $181
 $
 $181
$
 $
 $
 $
 $110
 $
 $110
2007
 
 
 
 447
 
 447

 
 
 
 244
 34
 278
2006
 
 
 
 74
 
 74

 
 
 
 26
 
 26
2005
 
 
 25
 67
 
 92

 
 
 14
 34
 
 48
2004 and earlier
 
 3
 357
 657
 2
 1,019

 
 12
 186
 264
 2
 464
Total Prime
 
 3
 382
 1,426
 2
 1,813

 
 12
 200
 678
 36
 926
Alt-A, option ARM                          
2007
 
 
 
 1,003
 
 1,003

 
 
 
 686
 
 686
2006
 
 
 
 175
 
 175

 
 
 
 130
 
 130
2005
 
 
 
 227
 
 227

 
 
 
 136
 
 136
Total Alt-A, option ARM
 
 
 
 1,405
 
 1,405

 
 
 
 952
 
 952
Alt-A, other                          
2008
 
 
 
 124
 
 124

 
 
 
 76
 
 76
2007
 
 
 
 1,640
 
 1,640

 
 
 
 740
 196
 936
2006
 
 28
 
 689
 
 717

 
 
 
 282
 101
 383
2005
 
 17
 
 2,810
 
 2,827

 2
 
 
 1,421
 48
 1,471
2004 and earlier10
 1
 31
 187
 585
 2
 816
2
 12
 12
 56
 281
 6
 369
Total Alt-A, other10
 1
 76
 187
 5,848
 2
 6,124
2
 14
 12
 56
 2,800
 351
 3,235
Total par value$10
 $1
 $79
 $569
 $8,679
 $4
 $9,342
$2
 $14
 $24
 $256
 $4,430
 $387
 $5,113

(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lowest of Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s,S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.

77


Table of Contents

The following table presents the ratings of the Bank’s other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS at December 31, 20142017, by collateral type at origination and by year of securitization.
 
Unpaid Principal Balance of Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS
by Year of Securitization and Credit Rating
Unpaid Principal Balance of Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS
by Year of Securitization and Credit Rating
Unpaid Principal Balance of Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS
by Year of Securitization and Credit Rating
              
(In millions)              
December 31, 2014      
December 31, 2017       
Unpaid Principal BalanceUnpaid Principal Balance
Credit Rating(1)
  
Credit Rating(1)
    
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of SecuritizationA
 BBB
 Below Investment Grade
 Total
AA
 Below Investment Grade
 Unrated
 Total
Prime              
2008$
 $
 $166
 $166
$
 $102
 $
 $102
2007
 
 385
 385

 210
 34
 244
2006
 
 31
 31

 10
 
 10
2005
 
 30
 30

 16
 
 16
2004 and earlier
 
 70
 70

 33
 
 33
Total Prime
 
 682
 682

 371
 34
 405
Alt-A, option ARM              
2007
 
 1,003
 1,003

 687
 
 687
2006
 
 175
 175

 130
 
 130
2005
 
 213
 213

 136
 
 136
Total Alt-A, option ARM
 
 1,391
 1,391

 953
 
 953
Alt-A, other              
2008
 
 124
 124

 76
 
 76
2007
 
 1,563
 1,563

 734
 196
 930
200628
 
 689
 717

 282
 101
 383
2005
 
 2,800
 2,800

 1,421
 48
 1,469
2004 and earlier2
 23
 277
 302
3
 126
 4
 133
Total Alt-A, other30
 23
 5,453
 5,506
3
 2,639
 349
 2,991
Total par value$30
 $23
 $7,526
 $7,579
$3
 $3,963
 $383
 $4,349
 

(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lowest of Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s,S&P, or comparable Fitch ratings. Credit ratings of BB and lower are below investment grade.

For the Bank’s PLRMBS, the following table shows the amortized cost, estimated fair value, credit- and non-credit-related OTTI, performance of the underlying collateral based on the classification at the time of origination, and credit enhancement statistics by type of collateral and year of securitization. Credit enhancement is defined as the percentage of subordinated tranches and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will absorb losses before the Bank will experience a loss on the security, expressed as a percentage of the underlying collateral balance. The credit enhancement figures include the additional credit enhancement required by the Bank (above the amounts required for an AAA rating by the credit rating agencies) for selected securities starting in late 2004, and for all securities starting in late 2005. The calculated weighted averages represent the dollar-weighted averages of all the PLRMBS in each category shown. The classification (prime or Alt-A) is based on the model used to run the estimated cash flows for the security, which may not necessarily be the same as the classification at the time of origination.


78


Table of Contents

PLRMBS Credit Characteristics
                                  
(In millions)                 
December 31, 2014               
(Dollars in millions)                 
December 31, 2017December 31, 2017               
            
Underlying Collateral Performance and
Credit Enhancement Statistics
            
Underlying Collateral Performance and
Credit Enhancement Statistics
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of Securitization
Amortized
Cost

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair
Value

 
Total
OTTI(1)

 
Non-
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Weighted
Average
60+ Days
Collateral
Delinquency
Rate

 
Original
Weighted
Average
Credit
Support

 
Current
Weighted
Average
Credit
Support

Amortized
Cost

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses(2)

 
Estimated
Fair
Value

 
Total
OTTI(1)

 
Non-
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Credit-
Related
OTTI(1)

 
Weighted
Average
60+ Days
Collateral
Delinquency
Rate

 
Original
Weighted
Average
Credit
Support

 
Current
Weighted
Average
Credit
Support

Prime                                  
2008$156
 $
 $168
 $
 $
 $
 18.98% 30.00% 15.93%$94
 $
 $106
 $
 $
 $
 13.06% 30.00% 10.32%
2007368
 9
 372
 (6) 5
 (1) 15.86
 22.57
 4.54
230
 (3) 239
 (1) 
 (1) 14.27
 22.91
 2.18
200665
 1
 68
 (1) 
 (1) 14.69
 12.54
 4.12
23
 
 25
 
 
 
 13.08
 12.28
 4.36
200591
 2
 90
 
 
 
 12.36
 11.97
 14.85
46
 
 48
 
 
 
 10.39
 11.88
 15.64
2004 and earlier1,018
 19
 1,001
 
 
 
 8.00
 4.45
 11.83
463
 (3) 466
 
 
 
 6.91
 4.50
 13.80
Total Prime1,698
 31
 1,699
 (7) 5
 (2) 11.53
 12.18
 10.28
856
 (6) 884
 (1) 
 (1) 10.20
 13.64
 9.73
Alt-A, option ARM                                  
2007825
 36
 811
 
 
 
 27.49
 44.16
 18.10
566
 (9) 621
 
 
 
 19.98
 44.22
 13.52
2006124
 5
 140
 
 
 
 24.87
 44.88
 8.99
98
 
 119
 
 
 
 16.38
 44.91
 3.85
200596
 3
 127
 
 
 
 23.39
 22.77
 6.20
50
 (1) 94
 
 
 
 16.28
 22.82
 5.12
Total Alt-A, option ARM1,045
 44
 1,078
 
 
 
 26.50
 40.80
 15.04
714
 (10) 834
 
 
 
 18.96
 41.26
 11.00
Alt-A, other                                  
2008121
 2
 119
 
 
 
 12.01
 31.80
 24.32
73
 
 74
 
 
 
 6.56
 31.80
 21.88
20071,421
 54
 1,425
 (4) 3
 (1) 22.85
 27.08
 12.40
793
 (14) 834
 (8) (3) (11) 18.35
 26.95
 8.63
2006536
 
 605
 
 
 
 21.79
 18.46
 2.38
273
 
 335
 
 
 
 17.67
 18.44
 0.58
20052,549
 108
 2,497
 (3) 2
 (1) 15.34
 14.09
 6.53
1,249
 (15) 1,330
 (1) (3) (4) 12.14
 14.44
 4.03
2004 and earlier813
 21
 802
 
 
 
 13.18
 8.10
 16.93
365
 (2) 371
 
 
 
 9.88
 8.27
 19.13
Total Alt-A, other5,440
 185
 5,448
 (7) 5
 (2) 17.75
 17.64
 9.36
2,753
 (31) 2,944
 (9) (6) (15) 14.20
 18.24
 7.09
Total$8,183
 $260
 $8,225
 $(14) $10
 $(4) 17.86% 20.07% 10.40%$4,323
 $(47) $4,662
 $(10) $(6) $(16) 14.36% 21.70% 8.30%

(1)Amounts are for the twelve monthsyear ended December 31, 2014.2017.
(2) Represents total gross unrealized losses, including non-credit-related other-than-temporary impairment recognized in AOCI. The unpaid principal
balance of Prime, Alt-A, option ARM, and Alt-A, other in a gross unrealized loss position was $221 million, $176 million, and $643 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017, and the amortized cost of Prime, Alt-A, option ARM, and Alt-A, other in a gross unrealized loss position was $221 million, $154 million, and $589 million, respectively, at December 31, 2017.

The following table presents a summary of the significant inputs used to determine potential OTTI credit losses in the Bank’s PLRMBS portfolio at December 31, 2014.2017.


79


Table of Contents

Significant Inputs to OTTI Credit Analysis for All PLRMBS
(In millions) 
December 31, 2014 
 
December 31, 2017 
Significant Inputs CurrentSignificant Inputs Current
Prepayment Rates Default Rates Loss Severities Credit EnhancementPrepayment Rates Default Rates Loss Severities Credit Enhancement
Year of SecuritizationWeighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average %Weighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average %
Prime  
200814.1 12.9 33.0 19.315.9 9.4 32.4 15.1
200710.5 3.3 31.8 9.912.3 3.1 20.1 8.8
200612.9 11.1 33.4 12.313.2 3.0 22.4 6.8
200516.3 5.0 31.3 13.219.6 4.6 19.7 12.8
2004 and earlier18.3 3.6 30.4 11.319.8 3.0 21.2 12.9
Total Prime16.7 6.0 31.2 13.018.1 4.8 24.2 13.1
Alt-A, option ARM  
20076.0 38.7 41.0 18.18.4 33.5 42.1 13.5
20065.4 39.1 41.9 9.07.7 34.8 37.5 3.9
20057.0 25.9 38.3 6.28.6 23.9 35.2 5.1
Total Alt-A, option ARM6.0 36.7 40.7 15.08.3 32.3 40.5 11.0
Alt-A, other  
200714.2 25.6 37.9 7.612.4 22.7 38.6 4.2
200613.3 23.4 41.7 9.411.1 24.1 38.0 7.2
200515.3 14.2 38.0 6.714.6 18.5 34.7 4.3
2004 and earlier16.3 11.2 31.7 17.018.1 10.2 30.6 19.5
Total Alt-A, other14.9 18.1 37.7 8.813.8 19.7 35.8 6.6
Total13.8 19.1 37.2 10.413.3 20.0 35.2 8.3

Credit enhancement is defined as the subordinated tranches and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will generally absorb losses before the Bank will experience a loss on the security, expressed as a percentage of the underlying collateral balance. The calculated averages represent the dollar-weighted averages of all the PLRMBS investments in each category shown. The classification (prime or Alt-A) is based on the model used to run the estimated cash flows for the security, which may not necessarily be the same as the classification at the time of origination.

The following table presents PLRMBS in a loss position at December 31, 2014.

PLRMBS in a Loss Position at December 31, 2014
          
(In millions)         
Collateral Type at Origination:
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 
Weighted
Average
60+ Days
Collateral
Delinquency
Rate

Prime$1,102
 $1,085
 $1,081
 $31
 10.03%
Alt-A, option ARM732
 637
 594
 44
 25.46
Alt-A, other3,151
 2,967
 2,799
 185
 16.38
Total$4,985
 $4,689
 $4,474
 $260
 16.31%

The following table presents the fair value of the Bank’s PLRMBS as a percentage of the unpaid principal balance by collateral type at origination and year of securitization.


80


Table of Contents


Fair Value of PLRMBS as a Percentage of Unpaid Principal Balance by Year of Securitization
                  
Collateral Type at Origination and Year of SecuritizationDecember 31,
2014

 September 30,
2014

 June 30,
2014

 March 31,
2014

 December 31,
2013

December 31,
2017

 September 30,
2017

 June 30,
2017

 March 31,
2017

 December 31,
2016

Prime                  
200892.36% 92.22% 92.82% 93.56% 91.67%96.89% 96.60% 92.68% 92.93% 92.87%
200783.38
 86.00
 84.32
 81.17
 80.36
86.40
 86.17
 83.80
 84.87
 83.93
200691.51
 91.82
 94.26
 93.97
 92.56
93.86
 93.98
 93.21
 92.25
 92.38
200597.78
 98.23
 97.72
 97.26
 97.01
100.58
 100.02
 99.55
 99.44
 98.97
2004 and earlier98.24
 98.75
 98.83
 98.52
 98.14
100.47
 100.21
 99.70
 99.09
 98.68
Weighted average of all Prime93.70
 94.67
 94.48
 93.64
 93.01
95.65
 95.44
 94.14
 94.15
 93.71
Alt-A, option ARM                  
200780.82
 81.14
 80.00
 78.53
 77.90
90.43
 90.00
 87.34
 83.66
 83.05
200679.83
 79.33
 79.29
 77.30
 75.71
91.66
 89.62
 86.82
 83.04
 80.76
200556.16
 56.01
 52.24
 50.35
 47.44
68.99
 65.67
 62.10
 57.79
 57.58
Weighted average of all Alt-A, option ARM76.72
 76.84
 75.39
 73.78
 72.66
87.53
 86.46
 83.66
 79.82
 79.05
Alt-A, other                  
200896.33
 93.86
 94.47
 95.42
 93.74
97.22
 96.70
 94.73
 93.62
 93.31
200786.85
 87.08
 84.69
 85.01
 83.76
89.07
 88.80
 87.38
 86.49
 85.88
200684.45
 84.70
 84.92
 83.68
 82.84
87.40
 87.02
 85.55
 83.63
 82.57
200588.29
 88.90
 88.45
 87.36
 86.80
90.44
 90.35
 88.96
 87.31
 87.11
2004 and earlier98.31
 98.56
 98.83
 98.09
 97.60
100.47
 100.21
 99.54
 99.10
 98.51
Weighted average of all Alt-A, other88.95
 89.33
 88.57
 87.94
 87.17
90.98
 90.80
 89.60
 88.33
 87.86
Weighted average of all PLRMBS88.03% 88.52% 87.81% 87.04% 86.28%91.18% 90.84% 89.36% 87.89% 87.40%

The Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, the gross unrealized losses on the PLRMBS that have not had an OTTI loss are primarily due to illiquidity in the PLRMBS market uncertainty about the future condition of the housing and mortgage markets and the economy, and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their acquisitionamortized cost. The Bank does not intend to sell these securities, it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, and the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, all of the gross unrealized losses on these securities are temporary. The Bank will continue to monitor and analyze the performance of these securities to assess the likelihood of the recovery of the entire amortized cost basis of these securities as of each balance sheet date.

If conditions in the housing and mortgage markets and general business and economic conditions deteriorate, the fair value of MBS may decline further and the Bank may experience OTTI of additional PLRMBS in future periods, as well as further impairment of PLRMBS that were identified as other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 20142017. Additional future credit-related OTTI losses could adversely affect the Bank’s earnings and retained earnings and its ability to pay dividends and repurchase capital stock. The Bank cannot predict whether it will be required to record additional credit-related OTTI losses on its PLRMBS in the future.

Derivative Counterparties. The Bank has also adopted credit policies and exposure limits for uncleared derivatives credit exposure. Over-the-counter derivatives may be either entered into directly with a counterparty (uncleared derivatives) or executed either with an executing dealer or on a swap execution facility and then cleared through a futures commission merchant (clearing agent) with a derivatives clearing organization (cleared derivatives). All credit exposure from derivative transactions entered into by the Bank with member counterparties that are not derivative dealers (including interest rate swaps, caps, floors, corridors, and collars), for which the Bank

81

Table of Contents

serves as an intermediary, must be fully secured by eligible collateral, and all such derivative transactions are subject to both the Bank’s Advances and Security Agreement and a master netting agreement.

Uncleared Derivatives. The Bank selects only highly rated derivative dealers and major banks (derivative dealer counterparties) that meet the Bank’s eligibility criteria to act as counterparties for its uncleared derivative activities. In addition, for all uncleared derivative transactions, the Bank has entered into master netting agreements and bilateral securitycredit support agreements with all active derivative dealer counterparties that provide for delivery of

81


Table of Contents

collateral at specified levels to limit the Bank’s net unsecured credit exposure to these counterparties. Under these policies and agreements, the amount of unsecured credit exposure to an individual derivative dealer counterparty is either (i) limited to an absolute dollar credit exposure limit according to the counterparty’s credit rating, as determined by rating agency long-term credit ratings of the counterparty’s debt securities or deposits, or (ii) set at zero (subject to a minimum transfer amount). All credit exposure from derivative transactions entered into by the Bank with member counterparties that are not derivative dealers (including interest rate swaps, caps, and floors), for which the Bank serves as an intermediary, must be fully secured by eligible collateral, and all such derivative transactions are subject to both the Bank’s Advances and Security Agreement and a master netting agreement.

The Bank is subject to the risk of potential nonperformance by the counterparties to derivative agreements. Unless the collateral delivery threshold is set at zero, the amount of net unsecured credit exposure that is permissible with respect to each counterparty depends on the credit rating of that counterparty. A counterparty generally must deliver collateral to the Bank if the total market value of the Bank’s exposure to that counterparty rises above a specific trigger point. Currently, all of the Bank’s active uncleared derivative counterparties have a zero threshold. As a result of these risk mitigation initiatives, the Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its uncleared derivative transactions with counterparties as of December 31, 20142017.

Cleared Derivatives. The Bank is subject to nonperformance by the derivatives clearing organizations (clearinghouses) and clearing agents. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent, to the clearinghouse, exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. However, the use of cleared derivatives mitigates the Bank’s overall credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and variation margin is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. The Bank does not anticipate any credit losses on its cleared derivatives as of December 31, 20142017.

The following table presents the Bank’s credit exposure to its derivative dealer counterparties at the dates indicated.
Credit Exposure to Derivative Dealer Counterparties
          
(In millions)         
December 31, 2017         
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional Amount
 Net Fair Value of Derivatives Before Collateral
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties

Asset positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
A$4,879
 $7
 $(5) $
 $2
Cleared derivatives(2)
85,692
 83
 (2) 
 81
Liability positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
AA300
 (1) 1
 
 
A638
 
 
 
 
BBB1,641
 (1) 1
 
 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties93,150
 88
 (5) 
 83
Member institutions(3)
16
 
 
 
 
Total93,166
 $88
 $(5) $
 $83
Derivative positions without credit exposure6,443
        
Total notional$99,609
        


82


Table of Contents

Credit Exposure to Derivative Dealer Counterparties
         
(In millions)         
December 31, 2014         
December 31, 2016         
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional Amount
 Net Fair Value of Derivatives Before Collateral
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties

Notional Amount
 Net Fair Value of Derivatives Before Collateral
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties

Asset positions with credit exposure:                  
Uncleared derivatives                  
AA$148
 $1
  $
  $
  $1
A7,439
 166
 (164) 

 2
$2,872
 $9
 $(6) $
 $3
Cleared derivatives(2)
10,629
 79
 (65) 
 14
Liability positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
A50
 
 
 
 
BBB826
 2
 (1) 
 1
Cleared derivatives(2)
14,290
 (10) 27
 
 17
55,024
 54
 8
 
 62
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties32,556
 $236
 $(202) $
 $34
58,722
 65
 1
 
 66
Member institutions(3)
13
 
 
 
 
Total58,735
 $65
 $1
 $
 $66
Derivative positions without credit exposure29,741
        6,334
        
Total notional$62,297
        $65,069
        
         
         
December 31, 2013         
Counterparty Credit Rating(1)
Notional Amount
 Net Fair Value of Derivatives Before Collateral
 
Cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Non-cash Collateral Pledged
to/ (from) Counterparty

 
Net Credit
Exposure to Counterparties

Asset positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
AA$8
 $
 $
 $
 $
A12,739
 332
 (255) (71) 6
Cleared derivatives(2)
31,082
 14
 7
 
 21
Liability positions with credit exposure:         
Uncleared derivatives         
A4,404
 (36) 37
 
 1
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to nonmember counterparties48,233
 $310
 $(211) $(71) $28
Derivative positions without credit exposure33,337
        
Total notional$81,570
        

(1)
The credit ratings used by the Bank are based on the lower of Moody's or Standard & Poor'sS&P ratings.
(2)Represents derivative transactions cleared with clearinghouses,LCH Ltd, the Bank’s clearinghouse, which areis not rated. LCH Ltd’s parent, LCH Group Holdings Limited, was rated A+ by S&P. On May 31, 2017, S&P lowered the rating to A and withdrew the rating at LCH Group Holdings Limited’s request. LCH Ltd’s ultimate parent, London Stock Exchange Group, plc., is rated A3 by Moody’s and A- by S&P.
(3)Member institutions include mortgage delivery commitments with members.

The increase or decrease in the credit exposure net of cash collateral, from one period to the next, may be affected by changes in several variables, such as the size and composition of the portfolio, market values of derivatives, and accrued interest.

Based on the master netting arrangements, its credit analyses, and the collateral requirements in place with each counterparty, the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on its derivative agreements.


83

Table of Contents

Market Risk

Market risk is defined as the risk to the Bank's market value and net portfolio value of capital and future earnings (excluding the impact of any cumulative net gains or losses on derivatives and associated hedged items and on financial instruments carried at fair value) as a result of movements in market interest rates, interest rate spreads, interest rate volatility, and other market factors (market rate factors). This profile reflects the Bank’s objective of maintaining a conservative asset-liability mix and its commitment to providing value to its members through products and dividends without subjecting their investments in Bank capital stock to significant market risk.

The Bank’s Risk Management Policy includes a market risk management objective aimed at maintaining a relatively low adverse exposure of the net portfoliomarket value of capital and future earnings (excluding the impact of any cumulative net gains or losses on derivatives and associated hedged items and on financial instruments carried at fair value) to changes in market rate factors. This profile reflects the Bank’s objective of maintaining a conservative asset-liability mix and its commitment to providing value to its members through products and dividends without subjecting their investments in Bank capital stock to significant market risk. See “Total Bank Market Risk” below.

Market risk identification and measurement are primarily accomplished through market value of capital sensitivity analyses, net portfolio value of capital sensitivity analyses and projected earnings and adjusted return on capital sensitivity analyses. The Risk Management Policy approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors establishes market risk policy limits and market risk measurement standards at the total Bank level as well as at the business segment level. Additional guidelines approved by the Bank’s Enterprise Risk Committee apply to the Bank’s two business segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business. These guidelines provide limits that are monitored at the segment level and are consistent with the Bank’s policy limits. Market risk is managed for each business segment on a daily basis, as discussed below in “Segment Market Risk.” Compliance with Bank policies and guidelines is reviewed by the Bank’s Board of Directors on a regular basis, along with a corrective action plan if applicable.



83


Table of Contents

Total Bank Market Risk

Market Value of Capital Sensitivity and Net Portfolio Value of Capital Sensitivity – The Bank uses market value of capital sensitivity (the interest rate sensitivity of the net fair value of all assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements) as an important measure of the Bank’s exposure to changes in interest rates. As explained below, the Bank measures, monitors, and reports on market value of capital sensitivity but does not have a policy limit for this measure.

Since 2008, the Bank has used net portfolio value of capital sensitivity as the primary market value metric for measuring the Bank’s exposure to changes in interest rates and has established a policy limit on net portfolio value of capital sensitivity. This approach uses valuation methods that estimate the value of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and mortgage loans in alternative interest rate environments based on valuation spreads that existed at the time the Bank acquired the MBS and mortgage loans (acquisition spreads), rather than valuation spreads implied by the current market prices of MBS and mortgage loans (market spreads). Risk metrics based on spreads existing at the time of acquisition of mortgage assets better reflect the market risk of the Bank because the Bank does not intend to sell its mortgage assets and the use of market spreads calculated from estimates of current market prices (which may include large embedded liquidity spreads) would not reflect the actual risks faced by the Bank.

Beginning in the third quarter of 2009, in the case of specific private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS) for which the Bank expects loss of principal in future periods, the par value of the other-than-temporarily impaired security is reduced by the amount of the projected principal shortfall and the asset price is calculated based on the acquisition spread. This approach directly takes into consideration the impact of projected principal (credit) losses from PLRMBS on the net portfolio value of capital, but eliminates the impact of large liquidity spreads inherent in the prior treatment of other-than-temporarily impaired securities.

The Bank’s net portfoliomarket value of capital sensitivity policy limits the potential adverse impact of an instantaneous parallel shift of a plus or minus 100-basis-point change in interest rates from current rates (base case) to no worse

84

Table of Contents

than –4%–4.0% of the estimated net portfoliomarket value of capital. In addition, the policy limits the potential adverse impact of an instantaneous plus or minus 100-basis-point change in interest rates measured from interest rates that are 200 basis points above or below the base case to no worse than –6%–6.0% of the estimated net portfoliomarket value of capital. In the case where a market risk sensitivity compliance metric cannot be estimated with a parallel shift in interest rates because of prevailing low interest rates, the sensitivity metric is not reported. Effective December 31, 2014, the Bank’s net portfolio value of capital sensitivity policy limits were modified to reflect the resumption of the Bank’s participation in the MPF Program. The Bank’s measured net portfoliomarket value of capital sensitivity was within the policy limits as of December 31, 2014.2017.

To determine the Bank’s estimated risk sensitivities to interest rates for both the market value of capital sensitivity and the net portfolio value of capital sensitivity, the Bank uses a third-party proprietary asset and liability system to calculate estimated net portfoliomarket values under alternative interest rate scenarios. The system analyzes all of the Bank’s financial instruments, including derivatives, on a transaction-level basis using sophisticated valuation models with consistent and appropriate behavioral assumptions and current position data. The system also includes a third-party mortgage prepayment model.

At least annually, the Bank reexamines the major assumptions and methodologies used in the model, including interest rate curves, spreads for discounting, and mortgage prepayment assumptions. The Bank also compares the mortgage prepayment assumptions in the third-party model to other sources, including actual mortgage prepayment history.

The table below presents the sensitivity of the market value of capital (the market value of all of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and associated interest rate exchange agreements, with mortgage assets valued using market spreads implied by current market prices) to changes in interest rates. The table presents the estimated percentage change in the Bank’s market value of capital that would be expected to result from changes in interest rates under different interest rate scenarios, using market spread assumptions. 

Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
for Various Changes in Interest Rates
Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
for Various Changes in Interest Rates
Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
for Various Changes in Interest Rates
  
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 2017 2016 
+200 basis-point change above current rates–2.7%–3.7%–3.8%–4.3%
+100 basis-point change above current rates–1.2 –1.7 –1.7 –2.0 
–100 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+2.6 +1.5 +2.0 +2.5 
–200 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+6.4 +3.1 +5.0 +6.3 

(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
(2)
Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative interest rates.

The Bank’s estimates of the sensitivity of the market value of capital to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2014, show a decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios and greater sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios compared with2017, are comparable to the estimates as of December 31, 2013. The change in sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios is primarily related to the impact of slower projected mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage. The slower mortgage prepayment speeds are primarily related to slower estimates of mortgage prepayments by borrowers that have experienced past opportunities to refinance, but have not. These types of borrowers are now considered less likely to prepay in the future. The effect of excess capital stock repurchases also increased sensitivity because sensitivities are expressed as a percentage of capital and the level of capital declined. The impact of the slower mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage were mitigated in the rising rate scenarios as a result of rebalancing actions implemented in the mortgage portfolio. In addition, the decrease in long-term interest rates contributed to the decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios.2016. LIBOR interest rates as of December 31, 2014,2017, were 1271 basis points higher for the 1-year term, 128 basis point lowerpoints higher for the 5-year term, and

85

Table of Contents

78 6 basis points lowerhigher for the 10-year term. Because interest rates in the declining rate scenarios are limited to non-negative interest rates and the current interest rate environment is soenvironments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were low, the interest rates in the declining rate scenarios cannotmay not decrease to the same extent that the interest rates in the rising rate scenarios can increase. As of December 31, 2014, interest rates could decrease less in a declining rate scenario relative to the measurements as of December 31, 2013.

The table below presents the sensitivity of the net portfolio value of capital (the net value of the Bank’s assets, liabilities, and hedges, with mortgage assets valued using acquisition valuation spreads) to changes in interest rates. The table presents the estimated percentage change in the Bank’s net portfolio value of capital that would be expected to result from changes in interest rates under different interest rate scenarios based on pricing mortgage assets at spreads that existed at the time of purchase rather than at current market spreads. The Bank’s estimates of the net portfolio value of capital sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2014, show a decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios and greater sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios compared with the estimates as of December 31, 2013. The change in sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios is primarily related to the impact of slower projected mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage. The slower mortgage prepayment speeds are primarily related to slower estimates of mortgage prepayments by borrowers that have experienced past opportunities to refinance, but have not. These types of borrowers are now considered less likely to prepay in the future. The effect of excess capital stock repurchases also increased sensitivity because sensitivities are expressed as a percentage of capital and the level of capital declined. The impact of the slower mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage were mitigated in the rising rate scenarios as a result of rebalancing actions implemented in the mortgage portfolio. In addition, the decrease in long-term interest rates contributed to the decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios.

Net Portfolio Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Net Portfolio Value of Bank Capital
for Various Changes in Interest Rates Based on Acquisition Spreads
     
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 
+200 basis-point change above current rates–2.7%–3.7%
+100 basis-point change above current rates–1.1 –1.6 
–100 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+1.9 +0.7 
–200 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+4.3 +0.6 
84

(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
(2)

Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative interest rates.

The Bank's Risk Management Policy provides guidelines for the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock based on the ratio of the Bank's estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock. If this ratio at the end of any quarter is: (i) less than 100% but greater than or equal to 90%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month LIBOR for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and any excess capital stock repurchases would not exceed $500 million (subject to certain conditions); (ii) less than 90% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend and any excess capital stock repurchases would be subject to the same limitations and conditions as in (i) above, except that any excess capital stock repurchases would not exceed 4% of the Bank's outstanding capital stock as of the repurchase date; and (iii) less than 70%, the Bank would not pay a dividend, not repurchase excess capital stock (but continue to redeem excess capital stock as provided in the Bank's Capital Plan), limit the acquisition of certain assets, and review the Bank's risk policies. A decision by the Board of Directors to declare or not declare any dividend or repurchase any excess capital stock is a discretionary matter and is subject to the requirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks. The ratio of the Bank's estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock was 167.9%207% as of December 31, 2014.2017.

Adjusted Return on Capital – The adjusted return on capital is a measure used by the Bank to assess financial performance. The adjusted return on capital is based on current period economic earnings that exclude the effects of

86

Table of Contents

unrealized net gains or losses resulting from the Bank’s derivatives and associated hedged items and from financial instruments carried at fair value, which will generally reverse through changes in future valuations and settlements of contractual interest cash flows over the remaining contractual terms to maturity or by the call or put date of the assets and liabilities held under the fair value option, hedged assets and liabilities, and derivatives. Economic earnings also exclude the interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the 20% of net income allocated to the Bank’s restricted retained earnings account in accordance with the FHLBanks’ JCE Agreement. Economic earnings exclude these amounts in order to more accurately reflect the amount of earnings that may be available to be paid as dividends to shareholders.

The Bank limits the sensitivity of projected financial performance through a Board of Directors policy limit on projected adverse changes in the adjusted return on capital. The Bank’s adjusted return on capital sensitivity policy limits the potential adverse impact of an instantaneous parallel shift of a plus or minus 200-basis-point change in interest rates from current rates (base case) to no worse than –120 basis points from the base case projected adjusted return on capital. In bothWith the upward and downward shift scenarios,indicated interest rate shifts, the adjusted return on capital for the projected 12-month horizon is notwould be expected to deteriorate relative todecrease by 28 basis points in the base case environment.–200 basis points scenario, well within the policy limit of –120 basis points.

Duration Gap – Duration gap is the difference between the estimated durations (market value sensitivity) of assets and liabilities (including the impact of interest rate exchange agreements) and reflects the extent to which estimated maturity and repricing cash flows for assets and liabilities are matched. The Bank monitors duration gap analysis at the total Bank level and does not have a policy limit. The Bank’s duration gap was less than one month at December 31, 2014,2017, and one month at December 31, 2013.2016.

Total Bank Duration Gap Analysis
              
December 31, 2014 December 31, 20132017 2016
Amount
(In millions)

 
Duration Gap(1)(2)
(In months)

 
Amount
(In millions)

 
Duration Gap(1)(2)
(In months) 

Amount
(In millions)

 
Duration Gap(1)
(In months)

 
Amount
(In millions)

 
Duration Gap(1)(2)
(In months) 

Assets$75,807
 10
 $85,774
 11
$123,385
 4
 $91,941
 6
Liabilities70,114
 10
 80,065
 10
116,579
 3
 86,404
 5
Net$5,693
 
 $5,709
 1
$6,806
 1
 $5,537
 1

(1)Duration gap values include the impact of interest rate exchange agreements.
(2)
Because of the current low interest rate environment, the duration gap is estimated using an instantaneous, one-sided parallel change upward of 100 basis points from base case interest rates.

Since duration gap is a measure
85


Table of market value sensitivity, the impact of large embedded mortgage liquidity spreads on duration gap is the same as described in the analysis in “Total Bank Market Risk Market Value of Capital Sensitivity and Net Portfolio Value of Capital Sensitivity” above. As a result of the liquidity premium investors require for these assets and the Bank’s intent and ability to hold its mortgage assets to maturity, the Bank does not believe that market value-based sensitivity risk measures provide a fundamental indication of risk.Contents

Segment Market Risk. Risk. The financial performance and interest rate risks of each business segment are managed within prescribed guidelines and policy limits.

Advances-Related Business – Interest rate risk arises from the advances-related business primarily through the use of shareholder-contributed capital and retained earnings to fund fixed rate investments of targeted amounts and maturities. In general, advances result in very little net interest rate risk for the Bank because most fixed rate advances with original maturities greater than three months and all advances with embedded options are simultaneously hedged with an interest rate swap or option with terms offsetting the advance. The interest rate swap or option generally is maintained as a hedge for the life of the advance. These hedged advances effectively create a pool of variable rate assets, which, in combination with the strategy of raising debt swapped to variable rate liabilities, creates an advances portfolio with low net interest rate risk.


87

Table of Contents

Money market investments used for liquidity management generally have maturities of less than three months.one month or less. In addition, the Bank invests in non-MBS agency securities, generally with terms of less than three years. These investments may be variable rate or fixed rate, and the interest rate risk resulting from the fixed rate coupon is hedged with an interest rate swap or fixed rate debt.

The interest rate risk in the advances-related business is primarily associated with the Bank’s strategy for investing capital (capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, and retained earnings). The Bank’s strategy is generally to invest 50% of capital in short-term investments (maturities of three months or less) and 50% in intermediate-term investments (a laddered portfolio of investments with maturities of up to four years). However, this strategy may be altered from time to time depending on market conditions. The strategy to invest 50% of capital in short-term assets is intended to mitigate the market value of capital risks associated with the potential repurchase or redemption of excess capital stock. Excess capital stock usually results from a decline in a borrower’s outstanding advances or by a membership termination. Under the Bank’s capital plan, capital stock, when repurchased or redeemed, is required to be repurchased or redeemed at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. The strategy to invest 50% of capital in a laddered portfolio of investments with short to intermediate maturities is intended to take advantage of the higher earnings available from a generally positively sloped yield curve, when intermediate-term investments generally have higher yields than short-term investments.

The Bank updates the repricing and maturity gaps for actual asset, liability, and derivative transactions that occur in the advances-related segment each day. The Bank regularly compares the targeted repricing and maturity gaps to the actual repricing and maturity gaps to identify rebalancing needs for the targeted gaps. On a weekly basis, the Bank evaluates the projected impact of expected maturities and scheduled repricings of assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements on the interest rate risk of the advances-related segment. The analyses are prepared under base case and alternate interest rate scenarios to assess the effect of options embedded in the advances, related financing, and hedges. These analyses are also used to measure and manage potential reinvestment risk (when the remaining term of advances is shorter than the remaining term of the financing) and potential refinancing risk (when the remaining term of advances is longer than the remaining term of the financing).

Because of the short-term and variable rate nature of the assets, liabilities, and derivatives of the advances-related business, the Bank’s interest rate risk guidelines address the amounts of net assets that are expected to mature or reprice in a given period. NetThe market value sensitivity analyses and net interest income simulations are also used to identify and measure risk and variances to the target interest rate risk exposure in the advances-related segment.

Mortgage-Related Business– The Bank’s mortgage assets include MBS, most of which are classified as HTMheld-to-maturity (HTM) or as AFS,available-for-sale (AFS), with a small amount classified as trading, and mortgage loans held for portfolio purchased under the MPF Program. The Bank is exposed to interest rate risk from the mortgage-related business because the principal cash flows of the mortgage assets and the liabilities that fund them are not exactly matched through time and across all possible interest rate scenarios, given the impact of mortgage prepayments and the existence of interest rate caps on certain adjustable rate MBS.

The
86


Table of Contents

Historically, the Bank purchasespurchased a mix of intermediate-term fixed rate and adjustable rate MBS. Generally, purchasesThe last purchase of long-terma fixed rate MBS have been relatively limited. Anywas in March 2014. Since March 2014, all MBS purchases were agency adjustable rate MBS. MPF loans that have been acquired are medium- or long-term fixed rate mortgage assets. This results in a mortgage portfolio that has a diversified set of interest rate risk attributes.

The estimated market risk of the mortgage-related business is managed both at the time an asset is purchased and on an ongoing basis for the total portfolio. At the time of purchase (for all significant mortgage asset acquisitions), the Bank analyzes the estimated earnings sensitivity and estimated net market value sensitivity, taking into consideration the estimated mortgage prepayment sensitivity of the mortgage assets and anticipated funding and hedging activities under various interest rate scenarios. The related funding and hedging transactions are executed at or close to the time of purchase of a mortgage asset.


88

Table of Contents

At least monthly, the Bank reviews the estimated market risk profile of the entire portfolio of mortgage assets and related funding and hedging transactions. The Bank then considers rebalancing strategies to modify the estimated mortgage portfolio market risk profile. Periodically, the Bank performs more in-depth analyses, which include an analysis of the impacts of non-parallel shifts in the yield curve and assessments of the impacts of unanticipated mortgage prepayment behavior. Based on these analyses, the Bank may take actions to rebalance the mortgage portfolio’s market risk profile. These rebalancing strategies may include entering into new funding and hedging transactions, forgoing or modifying certain funding or hedging transactions normally executed with new mortgage purchases, or terminating certain funding and hedging transactions for the mortgage asset portfolio.

The Bank manages the estimated interest rate risk associated with mortgage assets, including mortgage prepayment risk, through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank may obtain funding through callable and non-callable FHLBank System debt and may execute derivative transactions to achieve principal cash flow patterns and market value sensitivities for the liabilities and derivatives that provide a significant offset to the interest rate and mortgage prepayment risks associated with the mortgage assets. Debt issued to finance mortgage assets may be fixed rate debt, callable fixed rate debt, or adjustable rate debt. Derivatives may be used as temporary hedges of anticipated debt issuance or long-term hedges of debt used to finance the mortgage assets. The derivatives used to hedge the interest rate risk of fixed rate mortgage assets generally may be options to enter into interest rate swaps (swaptions) or callable and non-callable pay-fixed interest rate swaps. Derivatives may also be used to offset the interest rate cap risk embedded in adjustable rate MBS.

As discussed above in “Total Bank Market Risk Market Value of Capital Sensitivity and Net Portfolio Value of Capital Sensitivity,”Sensitivity” the Bank uses net portfoliomarket value of capital sensitivity as a primary market value metric for measuring the Bank’s exposure to interest rates. The Bank’s interest rate risk policies and guidelines for the mortgage-related business address the net portfoliomarket value of capital sensitivity of the assets, liabilities, and derivatives of the mortgage-related business. In addition, the Bank continues to use market value of capital sensitivity (the interest rate sensitivity of the net fair value of all assets, liabilities, and interest rate exchange agreements) as an important measure of the Bank’s exposure to changes in interest rates. The Bank measures, monitors, and reports on both the net portfolio value of capital sensitivity and the market value of capital sensitivity attributable to the mortgage-related business.

The following table presents results of the estimated market value of capital sensitivity analysis attributable to the mortgage-related business as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
Attributable to the Mortgage-Related Business for Various Changes in Interest Rates
Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
Attributable to the Mortgage-Related Business for Various Changes in Interest Rates
Market Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Market Value of Bank Capital
Attributable to the Mortgage-Related Business for Various Changes in Interest Rates
  
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 2017 2016 
+200 basis-point change–1.6%–2.1%–1.7%–2.2%
+100 basis-point change–0.7 –1.0 –0.7 –1.0 
–100 basis-point change(2)
+2.0 +1.0 +1.1 +1.3 
–200 basis-point change(2)
+5.0 +2.1 +3.2 +3.8 

(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
(2)
Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative interest rates.

The
87


Table of Contents

For the mortgage-related business, the Bank’s estimates of the sensitivity of the market value of capital to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2014, generally show a small decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios and greater sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios compared with2017, are comparable to the estimates as of December 31, 2013. The change in sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios is primarily related to the impact of slower projected mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage. The slower mortgage prepayment speeds are primarily related to slower estimates of mortgage prepayments by borrowers that have experienced past opportunities to refinance, but have not. These types of borrowers are now considered less likely to prepay in the future. The effect of excess capital stock repurchases also

89

Table of Contents

increased sensitivity because sensitivities are expressed as a percentage of capital and the level of capital declined. The impact of the slower mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage were mitigated in the rising rate scenarios as a result of rebalancing actions implemented in the mortgage portfolio. In addition, the decrease in long-term interest rates contributed to the decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios.2016. LIBOR interest rates as of December 31, 2014,2017, were 1271 basis points higher for the 1-year term, 128 basis point lowerpoints higher for the 5-year term, and 786 basis points lowerhigher for the 10-year term. Because interest rates in the declining rate scenarios are limited to non-negative interest rates and the current interest rate environment is soenvironments as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, were low, the interest rates in the declining rate scenarios cannotmay not decrease to the same extent that the interest rates in the rising rate scenarios can increase. As of December 31, 2014, interest rates could decrease less in a declining rate scenario relative to the measurements as of December 31, 2013.

The Bank’s interest rate risk policies and guidelines for the mortgage-related business address the net portfolio value of capital sensitivity of the assets, liabilities, and derivatives of the mortgage-related business. The following table presents results of the estimated net portfolio value of capital sensitivity analysis attributable to the mortgage-related business as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. The table presents the estimated percentage change in the value of Bank capital attributable to the mortgage-related business that would be expected to result from changes in interest rates under different interest rate scenarios based on pricing mortgage assets at spreads that existed at the time of purchase rather than current market spreads. The Bank’s estimates of the net portfolio value of capital sensitivity to changes in interest rates as of December 31, 2014, show a decrease in adverse sensitivity in rising rate scenarios and greater sensitivity in declining rate scenarios compared with the estimates as of December 31, 2013. The change in sensitivity in the declining rate scenarios is primarily related to the impact of slower projected mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage. The slower mortgage prepayment speeds are primarily related to slower estimates of mortgage prepayments by borrowers that have experienced past opportunities to refinance, but have not. These types of borrowers are now considered less likely to prepay in the future. The effect of excess capital stock repurchases also increased sensitivity because sensitivities are expressed as a percentage of capital and the level of capital declined. The impact of the slower mortgage prepayment speeds and increased leverage were mitigated in the rising rate scenarios primarily as a result of rebalancing actions implemented in the mortgage portfolio. In addition, the decrease in long-term interest rates contributed to the decrease in adverse sensitivity in the rising rate scenarios. Because interest rates in the declining rate scenarios are limited to non-negative interest rates and the current interest rate environment is so low, the interest rates in the declining rate scenarios cannot decrease to the same extent that the interest rates in the rising rate scenarios can increase. As of December 31, 2014, interest rates could decrease less in a declining rate scenario relative to the measurements as of December 31, 2013.

Net Portfolio Value of Capital Sensitivity
Estimated Percentage Change in Net Portfolio Value of Bank Capital
Attributable to the Mortgage-Related Business for Various Changes in
Interest Rates Based on Acquisition Spreads
     
Interest Rate Scenario(1)
December 31, 2014 December 31, 2013 
+200 basis-point change above current rates–1.7%–2.3%
+100 basis-point change above current rates–0.7 –1.0 
–100 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+1.3 +0.2 
–200 basis-point change below current rates(2)
+3.1 –0.2 

(1)Instantaneous change from actual rates at dates indicated.
(2)
Interest rates for each maturity are limited to non-negative interest rates.

Interest Rate Exchange Agreements.Agreements

A derivative transaction or interest rate exchange agreement is a financial contract whose fair value is generally derived from changes in the value of an underlying asset or liability. The Bank uses interest rate swaps; options to enter into interest rate swaps (swaptions); interest rate cap floor, corridor, and collarfloor agreements; and callable and putable interest rate swaps (collectively, interest rate exchange agreements) to manage its exposure to interest ratemarket risks inherent in its ordinary course of business, including its lending, investment, and funding activities.

90

Table of Contents


The Bank uses interest rate exchange agreements to implement the following hedging strategies for addressing market risk:
To convert fixed rate advances to LIBOR-indexed adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to fixed interest rates.
To convert non-LIBOR-indexedcertain adjustable rate indexed advances to LIBOR-indexedother adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to basis risk from non-LIBOR interest rates.risk.
To convert fixed rate consolidated obligations to LIBOR-indexed adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to fixed interest rates. (A combined structure of the callable derivative and callable debt instrument is usually lower in cost than a comparable LIBOR-indexed adjustable rate debt instrument, allowing the Bank to reduce its funding costs.)
To convert non-LIBOR-indexedcertain adjustable rate indexed consolidated obligations to LIBOR-indexedother adjustable rate structures, which reduces the Bank’s exposure to basis risk from non-LIBOR interest rates.risk.
To reduce the interest rate sensitivity and modify the repricing frequency of assets and liabilities.
To obtain an option to enter into an interest rate swap to receive a fixed rate, which provides an option to reduce the Bank’s exposure to fixed interest rates on consolidated obligations.
To obtain callable fixed rate equivalent funding by entering into a callable pay-fixed interest rate swap in connection with the issuance of a short-term discount note. The callable fixed rate equivalent funding is used to reduce the Bank’s exposure to prepayment of mortgage assets.
To offset an embedded option in an advance.

The following table summarizes the Bank’s interest rate exchange agreements by type of hedged item, hedging instrument, associated hedging strategy, accounting designation as specified under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, and notional amount as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.


9188


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
        
(In millions)     Notional Amount     Notional Amount
Hedging Instrument Hedging Strategy Accounting Designation December 31,
2014

 December 31,
2013

 Hedging Strategy Accounting Designation 2017
 2016
Hedged Item: Advances                
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate advance converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate Fair Value Hedge $9,883
 $12,448
 Fixed rate advance converted to an adjustable rate Fair Value Hedge $16,713
 $11,880
Basis swap  Adjustable rate advance converted to another adjustable rate index to reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps  
Economic Hedge(1)
 2
 2
Received fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swap LIBOR adjustable rate advance converted to a fixed rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 200
 
 Adjustable rate advance converted to a fixed rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,972
 1,432
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate advance converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 2,716
 1,926
 Fixed rate advance converted to an adjustable rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 19,401
 1,681
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap; swap may be callable at the Bank’s option or putable at the counterparty’s option Fixed rate advance (with or without an embedded cap) converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate; advance and swap may be callable or putable; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 4,892
 6,826
 Fixed rate advance (with or without an embedded cap) converted to an adjustable rate; advance and swap may be callable or putable; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 6,163
 3,677
Interest rate cap, floor, corridor, and/or collar Interest rate cap, floor, corridor, and/or collar embedded in an adjustable rate advance; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 156
 130
Interest rate cap or floor Interest rate cap or floor embedded in an adjustable rate advance; matched to advance accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 83
 30
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
     7,964
 8,882
     27,621
 6,822
Total     17,847
 21,330
     44,334
 18,702
Hedged Item: Non-Callable Bonds                
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate Fair Value Hedge 15,885
 17,877
 Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate Fair Value Hedge 5,373
 8,371
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 6,340
 1,163
 Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,106
 6,550
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate; matched to non-callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,425
 1,350
 Fixed rate or structured rate non-callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; matched to non-callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 90
 590
Basis swap Non-LIBOR adjustable rate non-callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate; matched to non-callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,175
 5,823
 Fixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond previously converted to an adjustable rate index, converted to another adjustable rate index to reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps 
Economic Hedge(1)
 7,050
 500
Basis swap Fixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond previously converted to an adjustable rate index, converted to another adjustable rate to reduce interest rate sensitivity and repricing gaps 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,400
 3,545
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap Fixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond, which may have been previously converted to LIBOR, converted to fixed rate debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 255
 860
 Fixed rate or adjustable rate non-callable bond, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 4,620
 
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
     10,595
 12,741
     12,866
 7,640
Total     26,480
 30,618
     18,239
 16,011


9289


Table of Contents

Interest Rate Exchange Agreements (continued)
        
(In millions)     Notional Amount     Notional Amount
Hedging Instrument Hedging Strategy Accounting Designation December 31,
2014

 December 31,
2013

 Hedging Strategy Accounting Designation 2017
 2016
Hedged Item: Callable Bonds                
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s option Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate; swap is callable Fair Value Hedge 2,250
 1,070
 Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable Fair Value Hedge 2,184
 490
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s option Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate; swap is callable 
Economic Hedge(1)
 3,175
 5,830
 Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable 
Economic Hedge(1)
 3,357
 685
Receive fixed or structured, pay adjustable interest rate swap with an option to call at the counterparty’s option Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to a LIBOR adjustable rate; swap is callable; matched to callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 4,148
 3,097
 Fixed or structured rate callable bond converted to an adjustable rate; swap is callable; matched to callable bond accounted for under the fair value option 
Economic Hedge(1)
 865
 950
Subtotal Economic Hedges(1)
   7,323
 8,927
   4,222
 1,635
Total     9,573
 9,997
     6,406
 2,125
Hedged Item: Discount Notes            
Pay fixed, receive adjustable callable interest rate swap Discount note, which may have been previously converted to LIBOR, converted to fixed rate callable debt that offsets the prepayment risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,670
 1,025
 Discount note, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate callable debt that offsets the prepayment risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,535
 1,535
Basis swap or receive fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swap Discount note converted to one-month LIBOR or other short-term adjustable rate to hedge repricing gaps 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,899
 15,048
 Discount note converted to short-term adjustable rate to hedge repricing gaps 
Economic Hedge(1)
 26,435
 23,244
Pay fixed, receive adjustable non-callable interest rate swap Discount note, which may have been previously converted to LIBOR, converted to fixed rate non-callable debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 315
 280
 Discount note, which may have been previously converted to an adjustable rate, converted to fixed rate non-callable debt that offsets the interest rate risk of mortgage assets 
Economic Hedge(1)
 400
 450
Total     3,884
 16,353
     28,370
 25,229
Hedged Item: Trading Securities                
Basis swap Basis swap hedging adjustable rate FFCB bonds 
Economic Hedge(1)
 2,363
 2,942
 Basis swap hedging adjustable rate Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds 
Economic Hedge(1)
 750
 750
Interest rate cap Stand-alone interest rate cap used to offset cap risk embedded in floating rate MBS 
Economic Hedge(1)
 2,150
 
 Interest rate cap used to offset cap risk embedded in floating rate MBS 
Economic Hedge(1)
 1,480
 2,150
Total 4,513
 2,942
 2,230
 2,900
Hedged Item: Intermediary Positions      
Interest rate cap/floor Stand-alone interest rate cap and/or floor executed with a member offset by executing an interest rate cap and/or floor with derivative dealer counterparties 
Economic Hedge(1)
 
 330
Hedged Item: Intermediary Positions and Offsetting DerivativesHedged Item: Intermediary Positions and Offsetting Derivatives      
Pay fixed, receive adjustable interest rate swap and receive fixed, pay adjustable interest rate swap Interest rate swap used to offset the economic effect of interest rate swap that is no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations 
Economic Hedge(1)
 14
 89
Total     14
 89
Stand-Alone Derivatives    
Mortgage delivery commitments N/A N/A 16
 13
Total     
 330
 16
 13
Total Notional Amount   $62,297
 $81,570
   $99,609
 $65,069

(1)Economic hedges are derivatives that are matched to balance sheet instruments or other derivatives that do not meet the requirements for hedge accounting under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities.

Although the Bank uses interest rate exchange agreements to achieve the specific financial objectives described above, certain transactions do not qualify for hedge accounting (economic hedges). An economic hedge introduces the potential for earnings variability caused by changes in the fair value of the derivatives that are recorded in the Bank’s income but are not offset by corresponding changes in the value of the economically hedged assets and liabilities. Finance Agency regulations and the Bank’s Risk Management Policy prohibit the speculative use of interest rate exchange agreements, and the Bank does not trade derivatives for profit.


90


Table of Contents

It is the Bank’s policy to use interest rate exchange agreements only to reduce the market risk exposures inherent in the otherwise unhedged asset and funding positions of the Bank and to achieve other financial objectives of the

93

Table of Contents

Bank, such as obtaining low-cost funding for advances and mortgage assets. The primary objective of the financial management practices of the Bank is to preserve and enhance the long-term economic performance and risk management of the Bank. In accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities, reported net income and other comprehensive income will likely exhibit period-to-period volatility, which may be significant.

At December 31, 2014, the total notional amount of interest rate exchange agreements outstanding was $62.3 billion, compared with $81.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The $19.3 billiondecrease in the notional amount of derivatives during 2014 was primarily due to a $12.5 billiondecrease in interest rate exchange agreements hedging discount notes, a $4.6 billion decrease in interest rate exchange agreements hedging consolidated obligation bonds, a $3.5 billiondecrease in interest rate exchange agreements hedging advances, a $0.6 billion decrease in interest rate exchange agreements hedging FFCB bonds, and a $0.3 billion decrease in interest rate exchange agreements hedging intermediary positions, partially offset by a $2.2 billion increase in interest rate exchange agreements hedging MBS investments. The notional amount serves as a basis for calculating periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid and is not a basis for measuring the amount of credit risk in the transaction.

The following tables categorize the notional amounts and estimated fair values of the Bank’s interest rate exchange agreements, unrealized gains and losses from the related hedged items, and estimated fair value gains and losses from financial instruments carried at fair value by type of accounting treatment and product as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
Notional Amounts and Estimated Fair Values
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
Notional Amounts and Estimated Fair Values
Interest Rate Exchange Agreements
Notional Amounts and Estimated Fair Values

                  
December 31, 2014         
December 31, 2017         
(In millions)
Notional
Amount

 
Fair Value of
Derivatives

 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged
Items

 
Financial
Instruments
Carried at
Fair Value

 Difference
Notional
Amount

 
Fair Value of
Derivatives

 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged
Items

 
Financial
Instruments
Carried at
Fair Value

 Difference
Fair value hedges:                  
Advances$9,883
 $(62) $62
 $
 $
$16,713
 $85
 $(88) $
 $(3)
Non-callable bonds15,885
 307
 (309) 
 (2)5,373
 (23) 24
 
 1
Callable bonds2,250
 4
 9
 
 13
2,184
 (12) 13
 
 1
Subtotal28,018
 249
 (238) 
 11
24,270
 50
 (51) 
 (1)
Not qualifying for hedge accounting (economic hedges):        
Not qualifying for hedge accounting:Not qualifying for hedge accounting:        
Advances7,964
 (69) 
 76
 7
27,621
 27
 
 (28) (1)
Non-callable bonds10,595
 43
 
 (12) 31
12,866
 
 
 (1) (1)
Callable bonds7,323
 (31) 
 54
 23
4,222
 (29) 
 10
 (19)
Discount notes3,884
 1
 
 
 1
28,370
 23
 
 
 23
FFCB bonds2,363
 
 
 
 
750
 (1) 
 
 (1)
MBS2,150
 9
 
 
 9
1,480
 1
 
 
 1
Mortgage delivery commitments16
 
 
 
 
Offsetting derivatives14
 
 
 
 
Subtotal34,279
 (47) 
 118
 71
75,339
 21
 
 (19) 2
Total excluding accrued interest62,297
 202
 (238) 118
 82
99,609
 71
 (51) (19) 1
Accrued interest
 20
 (38) 2
 (16)
 18
 (15) 9
 12
Total$62,297
 $222
 $(276) $120
 $66
$99,609
 $89
 $(66) $(10) $13


9491


Table of Contents

         
December 31, 2013         
December 31, 2016         
(In millions)
Notional
Amount

 
Fair Value of
Derivatives

 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged
Items

 
Financial
Instruments
Carried at
Fair Value

 Difference
Notional
Amount

 
Fair Value of
Derivatives

 
Unrealized
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged
Items

 
Financial
Instruments
Carried at
Fair Value

 Difference
Fair value hedges:                  
Advances$12,448
 $(87) $87
 $
 $
$11,880
 $23
 $(22) $
 $1
Non-callable bonds17,877
 490
 (491) 
 (1)8,371
 7
 (8) 
 (1)
Callable bonds1,070
 (8) 13
 
 5
490
 (1) 2
 
 1
Subtotal31,395
 395
 (391) 
 4
20,741
 29
 (28) 
 1
Not qualifying for hedge accounting (economic hedges):        
Not qualifying for hedge accounting:Not qualifying for hedge accounting:        
Advances8,882
 (107) 
 96
 (11)6,822
 
 
 2
 2
Non-callable bonds12,741
 73
 
 (17) 56
7,640
 
 
 (1) (1)
Callable bonds8,927
 (74) 
 142
 68
1,635
 (16) 
 10
 (6)
Discount notes16,353
 13
 
 
 13
25,229
 29
 
 
 29
FFCB bonds2,942
 (1) 
 
 (1)750
 (1) 
 
 (1)
Intermediated330
 
 
 
 
MBS2,150
 6
 
 
 6
Mortgage delivery commitments13
 
 
 
 
Offsetting derivatives89
 
 
 
 
Subtotal50,175
 (96) 
 221
 125
44,328
 18
 
 11
 29
Total excluding accrued interest81,570
 299
 (391) 221
 129
65,069
 47
 (28) 11
 30
Accrued interest
 19
 (33) 7
 (7)
 12
 (10) 6
 8
Total$81,570
 $318
 $(424) $228
 $122
$65,069
 $59
 $(38) $17
 $38

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, if applicable, and the reported amounts of income, expenses, gains, and losses during the reporting period. Changes in these judgments, estimates, and assumptions could potentially affect the Bank’s financial position and results of operations significantly. Although the Bank believes these judgments, estimates, and assumptions to be reasonably accurate, actual results may differ.

The Bank has identified the following accounting policies and estimates as critical because they require the Bank to make subjective or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts would be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These policies and estimates are: estimating the allowance for credit losses on the advances and mortgage loan portfolios; accounting for derivatives; estimating fair values of investments classified as trading and AFS, derivatives and associated hedged items carried at fair value in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and associated hedging activities, and financial instruments carried at fair value under the fair value option, and accounting for other-than-temporary impairment for investment securities; and estimating the prepayment speeds on MBS and mortgage loans for the accounting of amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on MBS and mortgage loans. These policies and the judgments, estimates, and assumptions are also described in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”


92


Table of Contents

Allowance for Credit Losses

The Bank has developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses, where applicable, for:
advances, letters of credit, and other extensions of credit, collectively referred to as “credit products,”
MPF loans held for portfolio,
term securities purchased under agreements to resell, and
term Federal funds sold.

95

Table of Contents


The allowance for credit losses for credit products and mortgage loans acquired under the MPF Program represents the Bank’s estimate of the probable credit losses inherent in these two portfolios. Determining the amount of the allowance for credit losses is considered a critical accounting estimate because the Bank’s evaluation of the adequacy of the provision is inherently subjective and requires significant estimates, including the amounts and timing of estimated future cash flows, estimated losses based on historical loss experience, and consideration of current economic trends, all of which are subject to change. The Bank’s assumptions and judgments in estimating its allowance for credit losses are based on information available as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Credit Products. In determining the allowance for credit losses on credit products, the Bank evaluates its exposure to credit loss taking into consideration: (i) the Bank's judgment as to the creditworthiness of the borrowers to which the Bank lends funds, and (ii) review and valuation of the collateral pledged by borrowers.

The Bank has policies and procedures in place to manage its credit risk on credit products. These include:
Monitoring the creditworthiness and financial condition of the borrowers.
Assessing the quality and value of collateral pledged by borrowers to secure advances.
Establishing borrowing capacities based on collateral value and type for each borrower, including assessment of margin requirements based on factors such as the cost to liquidate and inherent risk exposure based on collateral type.
Evaluating historical loss experience.

The Bank is required by the FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations to obtain sufficient collateral on credit products and to accept only certain collateral for credit products, such as one- to four-family first lien residential mortgage loans, multifamily mortgage loans, MBS, U.S. government and agency securities, deposits in the Bank, and certain other real estate-related collateral, such as commercial real estate loans and second lien residential mortgage loans. The Bank may also accept small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans that are fully secured by collateral (such as real estate, equipment and vehicles, accounts receivable, and inventory) as eligible collateral from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing Act added secured loans for community development activities as a type of collateral that the Bank may accept from community financial institutions.

At December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank had $39.0$77.4 billion of advances outstanding and collateral pledged with an estimated borrowing capacity of $186.3$262.5 billion. At December 31, 2013,2016, the Bank had $44.4$49.8 billion of advances outstanding and collateral pledged with an estimated borrowing capacity of $163.2$204.2 billion.

Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, the Bank’s credit analyses of borrowers’ financial condition, and the Bank’s credit extension and collateral policies as of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. Therefore, no allowance for losses on credit products was deemed necessary by the Bank. The Bank has never experienced a credit loss on any of its credit products.

Significant changes to any of the factors described above could materially affect the Bank’s allowance for losses on credit products. For example, the Bank’s current assumptions about the financial strength of any borrower may change because of various circumstances, such as new information becoming available regarding the borrower’s financial strength or changes in the national or regional economy. New information may cause the Bank to: place a

93


Table of Contents

borrower on credit watch, require the borrower to pledge additional collateral, require the borrower to deliver collateral, adjust the borrowing capacity of the borrower's collateral, require prepayment of the credit products, or provide for losses on the credit products.

Mortgage Loans Acquired Under the MPF Program. In determining the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans, the Bank evaluates its exposure to credit loss taking into consideration: (i) the Bank’s judgment as to the eligibility of participating financial institutions to continue to service and credit-enhance the loans sold to the Bank,

96

Table of Contents

(ii) evaluation of credit exposure on purchased loans, (iii) valuation of available credit enhancements, and (iv) estimation of loss exposure and historical loss experience.

The Bank has policies and procedures in place to manage its credit risk. These include:
Monitoring the creditworthiness and financial condition of the institutions that sold the mortgage loans to the Bank or their successors (both considered to be participating financial institutions) and their ability to meet servicing obligations.
Determining required credit enhancements to be provided by participating financial institutions and assessing the availability of other credit enhancements.
Estimating loss exposure and historical loss experience to establish an adequate level of allowance for credit losses.

The Bank maintains an allowance for credit losses, net of credit enhancements, on mortgage loans acquired under the MPF Program at levels that it believes to be adequate to absorb estimated losses identified and inherent in the total mortgage portfolio. Setting the level of allowance for credit losses requires significant judgment and regular evaluation by the Bank. Many factors, including delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, collectability of credit enhancements from institutions or from mortgage insurers, and prevailing economic conditions, are important in estimating mortgage loan losses, taking into account the available credit enhancement. The use of different estimates or assumptions as well as changes in external factors could produce materially different allowance levels.

The Bank calculates its estimated allowance for credit losses for itsMPF Original MPF loans and MPF Plus loans as described below.

The Bank has a process in place for monitoring and identifying loans that are deemed impaired. The Bank also uses a credit model to estimate credit losses. A loan is considered impaired when it is reported 90 days or more past due (nonaccrual) or when it is probable, based on current information and events, that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement.

Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans The Bank evaluates the allowance for credit losses on MPF mortgage loans based on two components. The first component applies to each individual loan that is specifically identified as impaired. The Bank evaluates the exposure on these loans by considering the first layer of loss protection (the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan) and the availability and collectability of credit enhancements under the terms of each master commitment, and then records a provision for credit losses. For this component, the Bank established ana de minimis allowance for credit losses for MPF Original loans as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. For MPF Plus loans, the Bank established an allowance for credit losses totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013, and for MPF Plus loans totaling $1 million as of December 31, 2014, and $2 million as of December 31, 2013.2016.

The second component applies to loans that are not specifically identified as impaired and is based on the Bank’s estimate of probable credit losses on those loans as of the financial statement date. The Bank evaluates the credit loss exposure on a loan pool basis considering various observable data, such as delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, and prevailing economic conditions. The Bank also considers the availability and collectability of credit enhancements from participating financial institutions or from mortgage insurers under the terms of each master commitment. For this component, the Bank established an allowance for credit losses for MPF Original MPF loans totaling de minimis amounts

94


Table of Contents

as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, and for MPF Plus loans totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Significant changes in any of the factors described above could materially affect the Bank’s allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans. In addition, as the Bank’s mortgage loan portfolio ages and becomes sufficiently seasoned and additional loss history is obtained, the Bank may have to adjust its methods of estimating its allowance for credit losses and make additional provisions for credit losses in the future.


97

Table of Contents

Term Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are considered collateralized financing arrangements and effectively represent short-term loans to counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, which are classified as assets in the Statements of Condition. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are held in safekeeping in the name of the Bank by third-party custodians approved by the Bank. In accordance with the terms of these loans, if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreement to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost of the agreement is charged to earnings. The Bank did not have any term securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Term Federal Funds Sold. The Bank invests in Federal funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, and these investments are evaluated for purposes of an allowance for credit losses if the investment is not paid when due. All investments in Federal funds sold as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, were repaid or are expected to be repaid according to the contractual terms.

Accounting for Derivatives

Accounting for derivatives includes the following assumptions and estimates by the Bank: (i) assessing whether the hedging relationship qualifies for hedge accounting, (ii) assessing whether an embedded derivative should be bifurcated, (iii) calculating the estimated effectiveness of the hedging relationship, (iv) evaluating exposure associated with counterparty credit risk, and (v) estimating the fair value of the derivatives (which is discussed in “Fair Values” below). The Bank’s assumptions and judgments include subjective calculations and estimates based on information available as of the date of the financial statements and could be materially different based on different assumptions, calculations, and estimates.

For additional discussion of the Bank’s accounting for derivatives, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” and “Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.”

Assessment of Effectiveness. Highly effective hedging relationships that use interest rate swaps as the hedging instrument and that meet certain criteria under the accounting for derivative instruments and hedging activities may qualify for the “short-cut” method of assessing effectiveness. The short-cut method allows the Bank to make the assumption of no ineffectiveness, which means that the change in fair value of the hedged item can be assumed to be equal to the change in fair value of the derivative. No further evaluation of effectiveness is performed for these hedging relationships unless a critical term is changed. Included in these hedging relationships may be hedged items for which the settlement of the hedged item occurs within the shortest period of time possible for the type of instrument based on market settlement conventions. The Bank defines market settlement conventions to be 5 business days or less for advances and 30 calendar days, using a next business day convention, for consolidated obligations. The Bank designates the hedged item in a qualifying hedging relationship as of its trade date. Although the hedged item will not be recognized in the financial statements until the settlement date, in certain circumstances when the fair value of the hedging instrument is zero on the trade date, the Bank believes that it meets a condition that allows the use of the short-cut method. The Bank then records the changes in fair value of the derivative and the hedged item beginning on the trade date.


95


Table of Contents

For a hedging relationship that does not qualify for the short-cut method, the Bank measures its effectiveness using the “long-haul” method, in which the change in fair value of the hedged item must be measured separately from the change in fair value of the derivative. The Bank designs effectiveness testing criteria based on its knowledge of the hedged item and hedging instrument that were employed to create the hedging relationship. The Bank uses regression analyses or other statistical analyses to evaluate effectiveness results, which must fall within established tolerances. Effectiveness testing is performed at inception and on at least a quarterly basis for both prospective considerations and retrospective evaluations.


98

Table of Contents

Hedge Discontinuance. When a hedging relationship fails the effectiveness test, the Bank immediately discontinues hedge accounting for that relationship. In addition, the Bank discontinues hedge accounting when it is no longer probable that a forecasted transaction will occur in the original expected time period and when a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the required criteria of a firm commitment. The Bank treats modifications of hedged items (such as a reduction in par value, change in maturity date, or change in strike rates) as a termination of a hedge relationship.

Accounting for Hedge Ineffectiveness. The Bank quantifies and records in other income the ineffective portion of its hedging relationships. Ineffectiveness for fair value hedging relationships is calculated as the difference between the change in fair value of the hedging instrument and the change in fair value of the hedged item. Ineffectiveness for anticipatory hedge relationships is recorded when the change in the forecasted fair value of the hedging instrument exceeds the change in the fair value of the anticipated hedged item.

Credit Risk for Counterparties. The Bank is subject to credit risk as a result of potential nonperformance by counterparties to the derivativesderivative agreements. All uncleared derivatives with counterparties that are members of the Bank and that are not derivative dealers, in which the Bank serves as an intermediary, are fully secured by eligible collateral and are subject to both the Bank's Advances and Security Agreement and a master netting agreement. For all derivative dealer counterparties, the Bank selects only highly rated derivative dealers and major banks that meet the Bank's eligibility requirements. In addition, the Bank enters into master netting agreements and bilateral security agreements with all active derivative dealer and major bank counterparties that provide for delivery of collateral at specified levels tied to counterparty credit rating to limit the Bank’s net unsecured credit exposure to these counterparties. The Bank makes judgments on each counterparty’s creditworthiness and estimates of collateral values in analyzing its credit risk for nonperformance by counterparties. In addition, the Bank is subject to nonperformance by the clearinghouse(s) and clearing agents. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent to the clearinghouse exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. However, the use of cleared derivatives mitigates the Bank’s overall credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and variation margin is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. See additional discussion of credit exposure to derivatives counterparties in “ Management’s“Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Derivative Counterparties.”

Fair Values

Fair Value Measurements. Fair value measurement guidance defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value under U.S. GAAP, and stipulates disclosures about fair value measurements. This guidance applies whenever other accounting pronouncements require or permit assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value. The Bank uses fair value measurements to record fair value adjustments for certain assets and liabilities and to determine fair value disclosures.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Fair value is a market-based measurement, and the price used to measure fair value is an exit price considered from the perspective of the market participant that holds the asset or owes the liability.


96


Table of Contents

This guidance establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs into the valuation technique used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:
Level 1 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which the transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

99

Table of Contents

Level 2 – Inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument.
Level 3 – Inputs to the valuation methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement. Unobservable inputs are supported by little or no market activity or by the Bank’s own assumptions.

A financial instrument's categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The use of fair value to measure the Bank's financial instruments is fundamental to the Bank's financial statements and is a critical accounting estimate because a significant portion of the Bank's assets and liabilities are carried at fair value.

The following assets and liabilities, including those for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition as of December 31, 2014:2017:
Trading securities
AFS securities
Certain advances
Derivative assets and liabilities
Certain consolidated obligation bonds
Certain other assets

In general, these items carried at fair value are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and are valued primarily using inputs that are observable in the marketplace or can be substantially derived from observable market data.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis, that is, the instruments are not measured at fair value on an ongoing basis but are subject to fair value adjustment in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). At December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank measured its REO and certain impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio on a nonrecurring basis at Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Bank monitors and evaluates the inputs into its fair value measurements to ensure that the asset or liability is properly categorized in the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. Because items classified as Level 3 are generally based on unobservable inputs, the process to determine the fair value of such items is generally more subjective and involves a higher degree of judgment and assumptions by the Bank.

The Bank employs internal control processes to validate the fair value of its financial instruments. These control processes are designed to ensure that the fair value measurements used for financial reporting are based on observable inputs wherever possible. In the event that observable market-based inputs are not available, the control processes are designed to ensure that the valuation approach used is appropriate and consistently applied and that the assumptions and judgments made are reasonable. The Bank’s control processes provide for segregation of duties and oversight of the fair value methodologies and valuations by the Bank. Valuation models are regularly reviewed by the Bank and are subject to an independent model validation process. Any changes to the valuation methodology or the models are also reviewed to confirm that the changes are appropriate.

97


Table of Contents


The assumptions and judgments applied by the Bank may have a significant effect on its estimates of fair value, and the use of different assumptions as well as changes in market conditions could have a material effect on the Bank’s results of operations or financial condition. See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data– Note 19 – Fair Value” for further information regarding the fair value measurement guidance (including the classification within the fair value hierarchy) and the summary of valuation methodologies and primary inputs used to measure fair value for all the Bank’s assets and liabilities carried at fair value.

100

Table of Contents


The Bank continues to refine its valuation methodologies as markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent. While the Bank believes that its valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a materially different estimate of fair value as of the reporting date. These fair values may not represent the actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of yearend or that will be realized in the future. Although the Bank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique or valuation methodology.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment for Investment Securities. A security is considered impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. For impaired debt securities, an entity is required to assess whether: (i) it has the intent to sell the debt security; (ii) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis of the security; or (iii) it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the impaired debt security. If any of these conditions is met, an OTTI on the security must be recognized.

With respect to any debt security, a credit loss is defined as the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. If a credit loss exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), the carrying value of the debt security is adjusted to its fair value. However, instead of recognizing the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value in earnings, only the amount of the impairment representing the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the amount of non-credit-related impairment is recognized in AOCI. The total OTTI is presented in the Statements of Income with an offset for the amount of the total OTTI that is recognized in AOCI. This presentation provides additional information about the amounts that the entity does not expect to collect related to a debt security. The credit loss on a debt security is limited to the amount of that security's unrealized losses.

For subsequent accounting of other-than-temporarily impaired securities, if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, the Bank records an additional OTTI. The amount of total OTTI for a security that was previously impaired is calculated as the difference between its amortized cost less the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI prior to the determination of OTTI and its fair value. For an other-than-temporarily impaired security that was previously impaired and has subsequently incurred an additional OTTI related to credit loss (limited to that security's unrealized losses), this additional credit-related OTTI, up to the amount in AOCI, would be reclassified out of non-credit-related OTTI in AOCI and charged to earnings. Any credit loss in excess of the related AOCI is charged to earnings.

Subsequent related increases and decreases (if not an OTTI) in the fair value of AFS securities will be netted against the non-credit component of OTTI previously recognized in AOCI.

For securities classified as HTM, the OTTI recognized in AOCI is accreted to the carrying value of each security on a prospective basis, based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows (with no effect on earnings unless the security is subsequently sold or there are additional decreases in cash flows expected to be collected). For securities classified as AFS, the Bank does not accrete the OTTI recognized in AOCI to the carrying value because the subsequent measurement basis for these securities is fair value.


98


Table of Contents

For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank recognizes accretion or amortization of OTTI credit charges along with the net interest income associated with the securities’ effective yield in net interest income in the Statement of Income. The total accretion or amortization associated with OTTI credit charges was $93 million, $101 million, and $82 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The Bank updates its estimate of future estimatedexpected cash flows for previously other-than-temporarily impaired securities on a regular basis. If there is no additional impairment on the security, the yield of the securityany improvement in expected cash flows is adjusted upward on a prospective basis when there is a significant increaseaccreted into interest income. This accretion, included in the expected cash flows. Thistotal accretion is included in net interest income in the Statements of Income, totaling $68or amortization amounts above, totaled $69 million, $26$81 million, and $9$74 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively.


101

Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2014,2017, on a cumulative basis, the Bank had recognized $1.4$1.5 billion in credit-related OTTI in its Statements of Income. Each reporting period, these losses were based on the Bank’s then-current best estimates of lifetime losses on each security determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired. As housing prices, mortgage credit conditions, and other key inputs into the Bank’s OTTI assumptions and estimates have improved, the Bank has seen significant increases in expected cash flows on previously other-than-temporarily-impaired securities. Based on the Bank’s current assumptions and estimates, the Bank’s estimate of lifetime losses on its other-than-temporarily-impaired securities as of December 31, 2014,2017, is $757$829 million. As a result of the increasesimprovements in expected cash flows and resulting decreases in estimated lifetime losses, the numberBank has recognized significant amounts of securities for whichaccretion-related income since 2015. As of December 31, 2017, the yield has been adjustedBank estimates that it will accrete approximately $335 million of additional interest income associated with the reduction in OTTI losses over the life of the securities. This estimate of accretion of additional interest income is a forward-looking statement. The Bank updates its estimates on a prospectivean ongoing basis, has increased. Asand actual results may differ materially from the Bank’s estimates and assumptions are updated each reporting period, the amount of improvement or decrement in expected cash flows will change each period. In addition, the number of securities with a significant improvement in cash flows and the prospective accretion of the increase in expected cash flows will vary each period.current estimation.

The Bank closely monitors the performance of its investment securities classified as AFS or HTM on at least a quarterly basis to evaluate its exposure to the risk of loss on these investments in order to determine whether a loss is other-than-temporary.

Each FHLBank is responsible for making its own determination of impairment and of the reasonableness of the assumptions, inputs, and methodologies used and for performing the required present value calculations using appropriate historical cost bases and yields. FHLBanks that hold the same private-label MBS are required to consult with one another to ensure that any decision that a commonly held private-label MBS is other-than-temporarily impaired, including the determination of fair value and the credit loss component of the unrealized loss, is consistent among those FHLBanks.

In performing the cash flow analysis for each security, the Bank uses two third-party models. The first model projects prepayments, default rates, and loss severities on the underlying collateral based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the loans underlying the Bank's securities, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. Another significant input to the first model is the forecast of future housing price changes for the relevant states and CBSAs, which are based on an assessment of the regional housing markets. CBSA refers collectively to metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. As currently defined, a CBSA must contain at least one urban area with a population of 10,000 or more people. The FHLBanks’ OTTI Committee developed a short-term housing price forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 4.0%5.0% to an increase of 7.0%12.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2014.2017. For the vast majority of markets, the projected short-term housing price changes range from a decreasean increase of 1.0%2.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for each geographic area based on an internally developed framework derived from historical data.

The month-by-month projections of future loan performance derived from the first model, which reflect projected prepayments, default rates, and loss severities, are then input into a second model that allocates the projected loan level cash flows and losses to the various security classes in each securitization structure in accordance with the structure's prescribed cash flow and loss allocation rules. When the credit enhancement for the senior securities in a securitization is derived from the presence of subordinated securities, losses are generally allocated first to the

99


Table of Contents

subordinated securities until their principal balance is reduced to zero. The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of these models can vary significantly with changes in assumptions and expectations. The scenario of cash flows determined based on the model approach described above reflects a best-estimate scenario and includes a base case housing price forecast that reflects the expectations for near- and long-term housing price behavior.

At each quarter end, the Bank compares the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected on its PLRMBS to the amortized cost basis of the securities to determine whether a credit loss exists. For the Bank's variable rate and hybrid PLRMBS, the Bank uses the effective interest rate derived from a variable rate index (for example, the one-month LIBOR) plus the contractual spread, plus or minus a fixed spread adjustment when there is an existing discount or premium on the security. As the implied forward curverates of the index changeschange over time, the

102

Table of Contents

effective interest rates derived from that index will also change over time. The Bank then uses the effective interest rate for the security prior to impairment for determining the present value of the future estimated cash flows. For all securities, including securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank updates its estimate of future estimated cash flows on a quarterly basis.

For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, the Bank recorded a credit-related OTTI charge of $4$16 million, $7$16 million, and $44$15 million, respectively.

Because there is a risk that the Bank may record additional material OTTI charges in future periods, the Bank's earnings and retained earnings and its ability to pay dividends and repurchase excess capital stock could be adversely affected in future periods.

Additional information about OTTI charges associated with the Bank’s PLRMBS is provided in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Risk Management – Credit Risk – Investments” and in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.”

Amortization of Premiums and Accretion of Discounts on MBS and Purchased Mortgage Loans

When the Bank purchases MBS and mortgage loans, it does not necessarily pay the seller the par value of the MBS or the exact amount of the unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. If the Bank pays more than the par value or the unpaid principal balance, purchasing the asset at a premium, the premium reduces the yield the Bank recognizes on the asset below the coupon rate. Conversely, if the Bank pays less than the par value or the unpaid principal balance, purchasing the asset at a discount, the discount increases the yield above the coupon rate.

The Bank amortizes premiums and accretes discounts from the acquisition dates of the MBS and mortgage loans. The Bank applies the level-yield method on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the MBS and purchased mortgage loans for which prepayments reasonably can be expected and estimated. This method requires a retrospective adjustment of the effective yield each time the Bank changes the estimated life as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the securities. Use of the retrospective method may increase volatility of reported earnings during periods of changing interest rates, and the use of different estimates or assumptions as well as changes in external factors could produce significantly different results.

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance and Interpretations

See “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 2 – Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance” for a discussion of recently issued accounting standards and interpretations.

Recent Developments

Basel Committee on Bank Supervision Final RuleThere are no recent developments for the fourth quarter 2017 that are expected to have a material effect on the Liquidity Coverage Ratio. On September 3, 2014,financial condition or results of operations or that are otherwise material to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation finalized the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) rule, applicable to: (i) U.S. banking organizations with $250 billion or more in consolidated total assets or $10 billion or more in total on-balance sheet foreign exposure, and their consolidated subsidiary depository institutions with $10 billion or more in total consolidated assets; and (ii) certain other U.S. bank or savings and loan holding companies having at least $50 billion in total consolidated assets (which will be subject to less stringent requirements under the LCR rule). The LCR rule requires such covered companies to maintain an amount of “high quality liquid assets” (HQLA) that is no less than 100% of their total net cash outflows over a prospective 30-day stress period. Among other things, the final rule defines the various categories of HQLA, called Levels 1, 2A, or 2B. The treatment of HQLA for the LCR is most favorable under the Level 1 category, less favorable under the Level 2A category, and least favorable under the Level 2B category.Bank.


103100


Table of Contents

Under the final rule, collateral pledged to the FHLBanks but not securing existing borrowings may be considered eligible HQLA to the extent the collateral itself qualifies as eligible HQLA; qualifying FHLBank System consolidated obligations are categorized as Level 2A HQLA; and the amount of a covered company’s funding that is assumed to run off includes 25% of FHLBank advances maturing within 30 days, to the extent these advances are not secured by Level 1 or Level 2A HQLA, for which 0% and 15% run-off assumptions apply, respectively. At this time, the impact of the final rule is uncertain. The final rule became effective January 1, 2015, and requires that all covered companies be fully compliant by January 1, 2017.

Final Rule on Capital Stock and Capital Plans. On October 8, 2014, the Finance Agency issued a proposed rule that would transfer existing parts 931 and 933 of the Federal Housing Finance Board regulations, which address requirements for FHLBanks’ capital stock and capital plans, to new Part 1277 of the Finance Agency regulations. The proposed rule would not make any substantive changes to these requirements, but would delete certain provisions that applied only to the one-time conversion of FHLBank stock to the new capital structure required by the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The proposed rule would also make certain clarifying changes so that the rules would more precisely reflect long-standing practices and requirements with regard to transactions in FHLBank stock. The proposed rule would add appropriate references to ‘‘former members’’ to clarify when former FHLBank members can be required to maintain investments in FHLBank capital stock after withdrawal from membership in an FHLBank. On March 11, 2015, the Finance Agency issued the final rule, without change. The final rule will be effective on April 10, 2015. The final rule is not expected to have an impact on the Bank’s operations.

Joint Final Rule on Credit Risk Retention for Asset-Backed Securities. On October 22, 2014, the Finance Agency and other U.S. federal regulators jointly approved a final rule requiring sponsors of asset-backed securities (ABS) to retain credit risk in those transactions. The final rule largely retains the risk retention framework contained in the proposal issued by the agencies in August 2013 and generally requires sponsors of ABS to retain a minimum 5% economic interest in a portion of the credit risk of the assets collateralizing the ABS, unless all the securitized assets satisfy specified qualifications. The final rule specifies criteria for qualified residential mortgage (QRM), commercial real estate, auto, and commercial loans that would make them exempt from the risk retention requirement. The definition of QRM is aligned with the definition of “qualified mortgage” (QM) as provided in Section 129C of the Truth in Lending Act and its implementing regulations, as adopted by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau. The QM definition requires, among other things, full documentation and verification of consumers’ debt and income and a debt-to-income ratio that does not exceed 43%, and generally restricts the use of certain product features, such as negative amortization and interest-only and balloon payments.

Other exemptions from the credit risk requirement include certain mortgage loans secured by three- to four-unit residential, owner-occupied properties that meet the criteria for QM and certain types of community-focused residential mortgages (including extensions of credit made by community development financial institutions). The final rule also includes a provision that requires the agencies to periodically review the definition of QRM, the exemption for certain community-focused residential mortgages, and the exemption for certain three- to four-unit residential mortgage loans, and consider whether they should be modified.

The final rule exempts agency MBS from the risk retention requirements as long as the sponsoring agency is operating under the conservatorship or receivership of the Finance Agency with capital support from the United States and fully guarantees the timely payment of principal and interest on all assets in the issued security. Further, MBS issued by any limited-life regulated entity succeeding to either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac operating with capital support from the United States would be exempt from the risk retention requirements. The final rule became effective February 23, 2015. Compliance with the rule with respect to asset-backed securities collateralized by residential mortgages is required beginning December 24, 2015, and compliance with the rule with regard to all other classes of asset-backed securities is required beginning December 24, 2016. The Bank has not yet determined the effect, if any, that this rule may have on the Bank’s operations.


104

Table of Contents

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual ObligationsCommitments

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements Guarantees, and Other Commitments

In accordance with regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, each FHLBank, including the Bank, is jointly and severally liable for the FHLBank System’s consolidated obligations issued under Section 11(a) of the FHLBank Act, and in accordance with the FHLBank Act, each FHLBank, including the Bank, is jointly and severally liable for consolidated obligations issued under Section 11(c) of the FHLBank Act. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor.

The Bank’s joint and several contingent liability is a guarantee, but is excluded from initial recognition and measurement provisions because the joint and several obligations are mandated by the FHLBank Act or Finance Agency regulation and are not the result of arms-length transactions among the FHLBanks. The Bank has no control over the amount of the guarantee or the determination of how each FHLBank would perform under the joint and several obligations. The valuation of this contingent liability is therefore not recorded on the balance sheet of any FHLBank. The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $847.2 billion at December 31, 2014, and $766.8$1,034.3 billion at December 31, 20132017, and $989.3 billion at December 31, 2016. The par value of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligations was $68.5$115.6 billion at December 31, 2014,2017, and $77.0$83.7 billion at December 31, 2013.2016. The Bank had committed to the issuance of $3$729 million and $1.6$1.5 billion in consolidated obligations at December 31, 2014,2017 and December 31, 2013,2016, respectively.

In addition, in the ordinary course of business, the Bank engages in financial transactions that, in accordance with U.S. GAAP, are not recorded on the Bank’s balance sheetStatement of Condition or may be recorded on the Bank’s balance sheetStatement of Condition in amounts that are different from the full contract or notional amount of the transactions. For example, the Bank routinely enters into commitments to extend advances and issues standby letters of credit. These commitments and standby letters of credit may represent future cash requirements of the Bank, although the standby letters of credit usually expire without being drawn upon. Standby letters of credit are subject to the same underwriting and collateral requirements as advances made by the Bank. At December 31, 20142017, the Bank had $1261 million in advance commitments and $5.416.2 billion in standby letters of credit outstanding. At December 31, 20132016, the Bank had $86 million in advance commitments and $3.615.2 billion in standby letters of credit outstanding.

For additional information, see “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes the Bank’s contractual obligations as of December 31, 20142017, except for obligations associated with short-term discount notes. Additional information with respect to the Bank’s consolidated obligations is presented in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 12 – Consolidated Obligations” and “Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.”

In addition, “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 15 – Capital” includes a discussion of the Bank’s mandatorily redeemable capital stock, and “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 16 – Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans” includes a discussion of the Bank’s pension and retirement expenses and commitments.

The Bank enters into derivative financial instruments, which create contractual obligations, as part of the Bank’s interest ratemarket risk management. “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities” includes additional information regarding derivative financial instruments.


105101


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations
                  
(In millions)                  
December 31, 2014         
December 31, 2017         
Payments Due By PeriodPayments Due By Period
Contractual Obligations< 1 Year
 1 to < 3 Years
 3 to < 5 Years
 ≥ 5 Years
 Total
< 1 Year
 1 to < 3 Years
 3 to < 5 Years
 ≥ 5 Years
 Total
Long-term debt$21,044
 $14,389
 $5,439
 $5,851
 $46,723
$69,734
 $9,246
 $4,052
 $2,076
 $85,108
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock51
 591
 3
 74
 719

 306
 
 3
 309
Capital leases2
 4
 3
 
 9
Operating leases4
 8
 7
 2
 21
5
 6
 
 
 11
Pension and post-retirement contributions8
 2
 5
 15
 30
3
 5
 7
 15
 30
Commitments to fund/purchase mortgage loans16
 
 
 
 16
Total contractual obligations$21,107
 $14,990
 $5,454
 $5,942
 $47,493
$69,760
 $9,567
 $4,062
 $2,094
 $85,483

ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

See “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Risk Management – Market Risk.”

102


106


ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Index to Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

Financial Statements:  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
     
Supplementary Data:  
   


107103




Management's Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

The management of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over the Bank's financial reporting. The Bank’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. There are inherent limitations in the ability of internal control over financial reporting to provide absolute assurance of achieving financial reporting objectives. These inherent limitations include the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, there is a risk that material misstatements may not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by internal control over financial reporting. These inherent limitations are known features of the financial reporting process, however, and it is possible to design into the process safeguards to reduce, although not eliminate, this risk.

Management assessed the effectiveness of the Bank's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2017. This assessment was based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting described in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, management concludes that, as of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank maintained effective internal control over financial reporting. The effectiveness of the Bank's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2017, has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, the Bank's independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in its report appearing on the following page, which expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Bank's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.2017.


108104



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco:

In our opinion,Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying statements of condition of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (the “FHLBank”) as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and the related statements of income, comprehensive income, capital accounts and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have audited the FHLBank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Federal Home Loan BankFHLBank as of San Francisco (the “FHLBank”)atDecember 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period endedDecember 31, 2014,2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the FHLBank maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The FHLBank'sFHLBank’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on thesethe FHLBank’s financial statements and on the FHLBank'sFHLBank’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the FHLBank in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, andas well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statement presentation.statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail,

105



accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Francisco, California
March 13, 20159, 2018

We have served as the FHLBank’s auditor since 1990.


109106



Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Condition

(In millions-except par value)December 31,
2014

 December 31,
2013

December 31,
2017

 December 31,
2016

Assets:      
Cash and due from banks$3,920
 $4,906
$31
 $2
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 590
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,000
 
11,750
 15,500
Federal funds sold7,503
 7,498
11,028
 4,214
Trading securities(a)
3,524
 3,208
1,164
 2,066
Available-for-sale (AFS) securities(a)
6,371
 7,047
3,833
 4,489
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities (fair values were $13,657 and $17,352, respectively)(b)
13,551
 17,507
Advances (includes $5,137 and $7,069 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)38,986
 44,395
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $1 and $2, respectively708
 905
Held-to-maturity (HTM) securities (fair values were $14,704 and $14,141, respectively)(a)
14,680
 14,127
Advances (includes $6,431 and $3,719 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)77,382
 49,845
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses of $0 and $0, respectively2,076
 826
Accrued interest receivable67
 81
119
 79
Premises, software, and equipment, net28
 25
29
 33
Derivative assets, net59
 116
83
 66
Other assets90
 86
95
 104
Total Assets$75,807
 $85,774
$123,385
 $91,941
Liabilities:      
Deposits$160
 $193
$281
 $169
Consolidated obligations:      
Bonds (includes $6,717 and $10,115 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)47,045
 53,207
Bonds (includes $949 and $1,507 at fair value under the fair value option, respectively)85,063
 50,224
Discount notes21,811
 24,194
30,440
 33,506
Total consolidated obligations68,856
 77,401
115,503
 83,730
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock719
 2,071
309
 457
Borrowings from other Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks)
 1,345
Accrued interest payable95
 95
116
 67
Affordable Housing Program (AHP) payable147
 151
204
 205
Derivative liabilities, net20
 47
1
 2
Other liabilities117
 107
165
 429
Total Liabilities70,114
 80,065
116,579
 86,404
Commitments and Contingencies (Note 20)





Capital:      
Capital stock—Class B—Putable ($100 par value) issued and outstanding:      
33 shares and 35 shares, respectively3,278
 3,460
32 shares and 24 shares, respectively3,243
 2,370
Unrestricted retained earnings294
 317
2,670
 888
Restricted retained earnings2,065
 2,077
575
 2,168
Total Retained Earnings2,359
 2,394
3,245
 3,056
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) (AOCI)56
 (145)318
 111
Total Capital5,693
 5,709
6,806
 5,537
Total Liabilities and Capital$75,807
 $85,774
$123,385
 $91,941

(a)
At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, none of these securities were pledged as collateral that may be repledged.
(b)
At December 31, 2014, a de minimis amount of these securities were pledged as collateral that may be repledged. At December 31, 2013, none of these securities were pledged as collateral that may be repledged.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

110107


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Income

For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Interest Income:          
Advances$299
 $340
 $520
$874
 $477
 $291
Prepayment fees on advances, net6
 5
 65
1
 5
 8
Interest-bearing deposits8
 2
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1
 1
 5
9
 12
 3
Federal funds sold11
 15
 12
115
 29
 9
Trading securities6
 7
 22
17
 10
 5
AFS securities278
 276
 317
239
 262
 264
HTM securities362
 392
 476
285
 251
 293
Mortgage loans held for portfolio42
 50
 77
52
 30
 33
Total Interest Income1,005
 1,086
 1,494
1,600
 1,078
 906
Interest Expense:          
Consolidated obligations:          
Bonds326
 432
 574
713
 410
 317
Discount notes20
 17
 21
285
 136
 46
Deposits3
 1
 1
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock120
 155
 51
32
 60
 65
Total Interest Expense466
 604
 646
1,033
 607
 429
Net Interest Income539
 482
 848
567
 471
 477
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 (1) (1)
 
 1
Net Interest Income After Mortgage Loan Loss Provision539
 483
 849
567
 471
 476
Other Income/(Loss):          
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities(1) 2
 (11)
Total other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) loss(14) (14) (55)(10) (26) (31)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) AOCI10
 7
 11
(6) 10
 16
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(4) (7) (44)(16) (16) (15)
Net gain/(loss) on trading securities
 4
 (2)
Net gain/(loss) on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(93) (23) (15)(31) (40) (50)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities(64) 26
 (101)(14) 9
 (16)
Gains on litigation settlements, net119
 510
 459
Other8
 7
 7
20
 18
 12
Total Other Income/(Loss)(154) 5
 (164)78
 485
 388
Other Expense:          
Compensation and benefits63
 63
 63
76
 74
 67
Other operating expense69
 53
 52
70
 74
 71
Federal Housing Finance Agency7
 7
 12
6
 6
 6
Office of Finance5
 5
 5
5
 4
 4
Quality Jobs Fund expense60
 
 
Other
 
 2
7
 
 
Total Other Expense144
 128
 134
224
 158
 148
Income/(Loss) Before Assessment241
 360
 551
421
 798
 716
AHP Assessment36
 52
 60
45
 86
 78
Net Income/(Loss)$205
 $308
 $491
$376
 $712
 $638

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

111108


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Comprehensive Income

For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Net Income/(Loss)$205
 $308
 $491
$376
 $712
 $638
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss):          
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits(5) 5
 
3
 (2) (2)
Net unrealized gain/(loss) on available-for-sale securities
 
 (1)
Net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on AFS securities:          
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred from HTM securities
 (4) (28)
 
 (1)
Net change in fair value of other-than-temporarily impaired securities209
 644
 1,102
195
 103
 (29)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) other income/(loss)(10) (3) 14
6
 (10) (15)
Total net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on AFS securities199
 637
 1,088
201
 93
 (45)
Net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on HTM securities:          
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) other income/(loss)
 (4) (25)
 
 (1)
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss7
 7
 9
3
 5
 6
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred to AFS securities
 4
 28

 
 1
Total net non-credit-related OTTI gain/(loss) on HTM securities7
 7
 12
3
 5
 6
Total other comprehensive income/(loss)201
 649
 1,099
207
 96
 (41)
Total Comprehensive Income/(Loss)$406
 $957
 $1,590
$583
 $808
 $597

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

112109


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Capital Accounts

Capital Stock
Class B—Putable
 Retained Earnings   
Total
Capital

Capital Stock
Class B—Putable
 Retained Earnings   
Total
Capital

(In millions)Shares
 Par Value
 Restricted
 Unrestricted
 Total
 AOCI
 Shares
 Par Value
 Restricted
 Unrestricted
 Total
 AOCI
 
Balance, December 31, 201148
 $4,795
 $1,803
 $
 $1,803
 $(1,893) $4,705
Balance, December 31, 201433
 $3,278
 $2,065
 $294
 $2,359
 $56
 $5,693
Comprehensive income/(loss)    103
 535
 638
 (41) 597
Issuance of capital stock3
 266
         266
8
 829
         829
Repurchase of capital stock(9) (864)         (864)(14) (1,439)         (1,439)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net
 (37)         (37)(4) (415)         (415)
Transfers from restricted retained earnings    (150) 150
 
   
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (12.39%)      (369) (369)   (369)
Balance, December 31, 201523
 $2,253
 $2,018
 $610
 $2,628
 $15
 $4,896
Comprehensive income/(loss)    198
 293
 491
 1,099
 1,590
    150
 562
 712
 96
 808
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (0.97%)      (47) (47)   (47)
Balance, December 31, 201242
 $4,160
 $2,001
 $246
 $2,247
 $(794) $5,613
Issuance of capital stock5
 530
         530
9
 926
         926
Repurchase of capital stock(12) (1,226)         (1,226)(7) (753)         (753)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net
 (4)         (4)(1) (56)         (56)
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (12.33%)      (284) (284)   (284)
Balance, December 31, 201624
 $2,370
 $2,168
 $888
 $3,056
 $111
 $5,537
Comprehensive income/(loss)    76
 232
 308
 649
 957


 

 178
 198
 376
 207
 583
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (3.99%)      (161) (161)   (161)
Balance, December 31, 201335
  $3,460
 $2,077
  $317
 $2,394
 $(145) $5,709
Issuance of capital stock8
 762
         762
12
 1,214
 
 
   
 1,214
Repurchase of capital stock(10) (941)         (941)(4) (339) 
 
   
 (339)
Capital stock reclassified from/(to) mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net
 (3)         (3)
 (2) 

 

   

 (2)
Comprehensive income/(loss)    (12) 217
 205
 201
 406
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (7.02%)      (240) (240)   (240)
Balance, December 31, 201433
 $3,278
 $2,065
 $294
 $2,359
 $56
 $5,693
Transfers from restricted retained earnings
 

 (1,771) 1,771
 
 
 
Cash dividends paid on capital stock (7.50%)
 

 
 (187) (187) 
 (187)
Balance, December 31, 201732
 $3,243
 $575
 $2,670
 $3,245
 $318
 $6,806

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

113110


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Cash Flows

For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Cash Flows from Operating Activities:          
Net Income/(Loss)$205
 $308
 $491
$376
 $712
 $638
Adjustments to reconcile net income/(loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization(90) (68) (32)(62) (82) (80)
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 (1) (1)
 
 1
Change in net fair value adjustment on trading securities1
 (2) 11
Change in net fair value of trading securities
 (4) 2
Change in net fair value adjustment on advances and consolidated obligation bonds held under the fair value option93
 23
 15
31
 40
 50
Change in net derivatives and hedging activities(64) 7
 42
(8) (24) (33)
Net OTTI loss, credit-related4
 7
 44
16
 16
 15
Net change in:          
Accrued interest receivable18
 21
 86
(45) (22) 16
Other assets(4) (8) (10)6
 (21) (9)
Accrued interest payable1
 (85) (66)50
 (17) (20)
Other liabilities1
 18
 2
(22) (16) 109
Total adjustments(40) (88) 91
(34) (130) 51
Net cash provided by/(used in) operating activities165
 220
 582
342
 582
 689
Cash Flows from Investing Activities:          
Net change in:          
Interest-bearing deposits(352) (128) 28
(514) 294
 (404)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell(1,000) 1,500
 (1,500)3,750
 (5,500) (9,000)
Federal funds sold(5) 3,359
 (5,491)(6,814) 412
 2,877
Premises, software, and equipment(12) (8) (7)(12) (13) (12)
Trading securities:          
Proceeds from maturities of long-term582
 236
 2,548
902
 277
 2,339
Purchases of long-term(899) (525) (2,666)
 (1,155) 
AFS securities:          
Proceeds from maturities of long-term938
 1,283
 3,208
933
 1,104
 996
HTM securities:          
Net (increase)/decrease in short-term1,660
 79
 3,602
850
 (1,350) 
Proceeds from maturities of long-term2,504
 3,927
 4,397
3,240
 2,927
 2,746
Purchases of long-term(207) (4,193) (4,014)(4,901) (4,639) 
Advances:          
Principal collected780,733
 529,782
 361,716
Made to members(775,375) (530,789) (337,460)
Repaid1,575,597
 1,414,120
 1,057,469
Originated(1,603,226) (1,413,136) (1,069,480)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:          
Principal collected200
 379
 540
184
 175
 184
Purchases(4) 
 
(1,413) (343) (131)
Proceeds from sales of foreclosed assets3
 4
 3
3
 3
 4
Net cash provided by/(used in) investing activities8,766
 4,906
 24,904
(31,421) (6,824) (12,412)
 


114111


Table of Contents

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Statements of Cash Flows (continued)

For the Years Ended December 31,For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Cash Flows from Financing Activities:          
Net change in:     
Deposits254
 273
 (360)
Net change in deposits and other financing activities114
 (923) 262
Borrowings from other FHLBanks(1,345) 1,345
 
Net (payments)/proceeds on derivative contracts with financing elements14
 66
 48

 9
 17
Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:          
Bonds31,415
 29,195
 53,478
80,506
 40,041
 38,935
Discount notes104,611
 107,252
 49,244
165,408
 136,608
 106,536
Bonds transferred from another Federal Home Loan Bank
 122
 
Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations: 
    
   
Bonds(37,446)
(45,827) (66,189)(45,622)
(41,514) (33,968)
Discount notes(106,991)
(88,272) (63,180)(168,491)
(130,761) (100,717)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock762

530
 266
1,214

926
 829
Payments for repurchase/redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(1,355)
(2,276) (1,272)(150)
(87) (646)
Payments for repurchase of capital stock(941) (1,226) (864)(339) (753) (1,439)
Cash dividends paid(240)
(161) (47)(187)
(284) (369)
Net cash provided by/(used in) financing activities(9,917)
(324) (28,876)31,108

4,607
 9,440
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and due from banks(986)
4,802
 (3,390)29

(1,635) (2,283)
Cash and due from banks at beginning of the period4,906
 104
 3,494
2
 1,637
 3,920
Cash and due from banks at end of the period$3,920

$4,906
 $104
$31

$2
 $1,637
Supplemental Disclosures:          
Interest paid$457
 $520
 $627
$990
 $578
 $412
AHP payments40
 45
 66
53
 53
 53
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing Activities:     
Supplemental Disclosures of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities:     
Transfers of mortgage loans to real estate owned3
 4
 5
1
 1
 2
Transfers of other-than-temporarily impaired HTM securities to AFS securities
 72
 140

 
 15
Transfers of capital stock to mandatorily redeemable capital stock2
 56
 415

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

115112


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements






(Dollars in millions except per share amounts)

Background Information

The Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank), a federally chartered corporation exempt from ordinary federal, state, and local taxation except real property taxes, is one of 12 District11 regional Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). The FHLBanks are government-sponsored enterprises (GSEs) that serve the public by enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community development by providing a readily available, competitively priced source of funds to their member institutions. Each FHLBank is operated as a separate entity with its own management, employees, and board of directors. The Bank does not have any special purpose entities or any other type of off-balance sheet conduits. The Bank has a cooperative ownership structure. Regulated financial depositories and insurance companies engaged in residential housing finance, with principal places of business located in Arizona, California, and Nevada, are eligible to apply for membership. In addition, authorized community development financial institutions are eligible to be members of the Bank. All members are required to purchase capital stock in the Bank. State and local housing authorities that meet certain statutory criteria may also borrow from the Bank. While eligible to borrow, these housing authorities are not members of the Bank, and, as such, are not required to hold capital stock. To access the Bank's products and services, a financial institution must be approved for membership and purchase capital stock in the Bank. The member's capital stock requirement is generally based on its use of Bank products, subject to a minimum asset-based membership requirement that is intended to reflect the value to the member of having ready access to the Bank as a reliable source of competitively priced funds. Bank capital stock is issued, transferred, redeemed, and repurchased at its par value of $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. It is not publicly traded. All shareholders may receive dividends on their capital stock, to the extent declared by the Bank's Board of Directors.

The Bank conducts business with members in the ordinary course of business. See Note 21 – Transactions with Certain Members, Certain Nonmembers, and Other FHLBanks for more information.

The Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), an independent federal agency in the executive branch of the United States government, supervises and regulates the FHLBanks and the FHLBanks' Office of Finance.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks that facilitates the issuance and servicing of the debt instruments (consolidated obligations) of the FHLBanks and prepares the combined quarterly and annual financial reports of the FHLBanks.

The primary source of funds for the FHLBanks is the proceeds from the sale to the public of the FHLBanks' consolidated obligations through the Office of Finance using authorized securities dealers. As provided by the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all the FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. Other funds are provided by deposits, other borrowings, and the issuance of capital stock to members. The Bank primarily uses these funds to provide advances to members.

Note 1 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates, and assumptions that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income, expenses, gains, and losses during the reporting period. The most significant of these estimates include estimating the allowance for credit losses on the advances and mortgage loan portfolios; accounting for derivatives; estimating fair values of investments classified as trading and available-for-sale, derivatives and associated hedged items carried at fair value in accordance with the accounting for derivative instruments and associated hedging activities, and financial instruments carried at fair value under the fair value option, and accounting for other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) for investment

116113


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



securities; and estimating the prepayment speeds on mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and mortgage loans for the accounting of amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts on MBS and mortgage loans. Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates.

Estimated Fair Values. Many of the Bank's financial instruments lack an available liquid trading market as characterized by frequent exchange transactions between a willing buyer and willing seller. Therefore, the Bank uses financial models employing significant assumptions and present value calculations for the purpose of determining estimated fair values. Thus, the fair values may not represent the actual values of the financial instruments that could have been realized as of yearend or that will be realized in the future.

Fair values for certain financial instruments are based on quoted prices, market rates, or replacement rates for similar financial instruments as of the last business day of the year. The estimated fair values of the Bank's financial instruments and related assumptions are detailed in Note 19 – Fair Value.

Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell. These investments provide short-term liquidity and are carried at cost. The Bank treats securities purchased under agreements to resell as collateralized financing arrangements because they effectively represent short-term loans to counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, which are classified as assets in the Statements of Condition. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are held in safekeeping in the name of the Bank by third-party custodians approved by the Bank. In accordance with the terms of these loans, if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreement to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost of the agreement is charged to earnings.

Federal Funds Sold. These investments provide short-term liquidity and are carried at cost. The Bank invests in Federal funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality.

Interest-bearing Deposits. This investment provides short-term liquidity and is carried at cost. Interest-bearing deposits includeinterest-bearing deposits in banks not meeting the definition of a security. Interest income on interest-bearing deposits is accrued as earned and recorded in interest income on the Statements of Income.

Investment Securities. The Bank classifies investments as trading, available-for-sale (AFS), or held-to-maturity (HTM) at the date of acquisition. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade date basis.

The Bank classifies certain investments as trading. These securities are held for liquidity purposes and carried at fair value with changes in the fair value of these investments recorded in other income. The Bank does not participate in speculative trading practices and holds these investments indefinitely as the Bank periodically evaluates its liquidity needs.

The Bank classifies certain securities as AFS and carries these securities at their fair value. Unrealized gains and losses on these securities are recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI).

HTM securities are carried at cost, adjusted for periodic principal repayments; amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts; and previous OTTI recognized in net income and AOCI. The Bank classifies these investments as HTM securities because the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities until maturity.

Certain changes in circumstances may cause the Bank to change its intent to hold a certain security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. Thus, the sale or transfer of an HTM security because of certain changes in circumstances, such as evidence of significant deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness or changes in regulatory requirements, is not considered to be inconsistent with its original classification. Other events that are isolated, nonrecurring, and unusual for the Bank

114


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



that could not have been reasonably anticipated may cause the Bank to sell or transfer an HTM security without necessarily calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity. In addition, sales of debt securities that meet either of the following two conditions may be considered as maturities for purposes of the classification of securities: (i) the sale occurs near enough to its maturity date (or call date if exercise of the call is probable) that interest rate risk is substantially eliminated as a pricing factor and changes in market interest rates

117

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



would not have a significant effect on the security's fair value, or (ii) the sale occurs after the Bank has already collected a substantial portion (at least 85%) of the principal outstanding at acquisition because of prepayments on the debt security or scheduled payments on a debt security payable in equal installments (both principal and interest) over its term.

The Bank calculates the amortization of purchase premiums and accretion of purchase discounts on investments using the level-yield method on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the securities. This method requires a retrospective adjustment of the effective yield each time the Bank changes the estimated life as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the securities. The Bank uses nationally recognized, market-based, third-party prepayment models to project estimated lives.

On a quarterly basis, the Bank evaluates its individual AFS and HTM investment securities in an unrealized loss position for OTTI. A security is considered impaired when its fair value is less than its amortized cost basis. For impaired debt securities, an entity is required to assess whether: (i) it has the intent to sell the debt security; (ii) it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the debt security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis of the security; or (iii) it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis of the impaired debt security. If any of these conditions is met, an OTTI on the security must be recognized.

With respect to any debt security, a credit loss is defined as the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected. If a credit loss exists but the entity does not intend to sell the debt security and it is not more likely than not that the entity will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost basis (the amortized cost basis less any current-period credit loss), the carrying value of the debt security is adjusted to its fair value. However, instead of recognizing the entire difference between the amortized cost basis and fair value in earnings, only the amount of the impairment representing the credit loss is recognized in earnings, while the amount of non-credit-related impairment is recognized in AOCI. The total OTTI is presented in the Statements of Income with an offset for the amount of the total OTTI that is recognized in AOCI. This presentation provides additional information about the amounts that the entity does not expect to collect related to a debt security. The credit loss on a debt security is limited to the amount of that security's unrealized losses.

For subsequent accounting of other-than-temporarily impaired securities, if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, the Bank records an additional OTTI. The amount of total OTTI for a security that was previously impaired is calculated as the difference between its amortized cost less the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI prior to the determination of OTTI and its fair value. For an other-than-temporarily impaired security that was previously impaired and has subsequently incurred an additional OTTI related to credit loss (limited to that security's unrealized losses), this additional credit-related OTTI, up to the amount in AOCI, would be reclassified out of non-credit-related OTTI in AOCI and charged to earnings. Any credit loss in excess of the related AOCI is charged to earnings.

Subsequent related increases and decreases (if not an OTTI) in the fair value of AFS securities will be netted against the non-credit component of OTTI previously recognized in AOCI.

For securities classified as HTM, the OTTI recognized in AOCI is accreted to the carrying value of each security on a prospective basis, based on the amount and timing of future estimated cash flows (with no effect on earnings unless the security is subsequently sold or there are additional decreases in cash flows expected to be collected). For securities classified as AFS, the Bank does not accrete the OTTI recognized in AOCI to the carrying value because the subsequent measurement basis for these securities is fair value.

115


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




For securities previously identified as other-than-temporarily impaired, the Bank updates its estimate of future estimated cash flows on a regular basis. If there is no additional impairment on the security, the yield of the security is adjusted upward on a prospective basis when there is a significant increaseany improvement in the expected cash flows. This accretionflows is included in netaccreted into interest income in the Statements of Income.

118

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Financial Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements. The Bank presents certain financial instruments, including derivative instruments and securities purchased under agreements to resell, on a net basis when they have a legal right of offset and all other requirements for netting are met (collectively referred to as the netting requirements). The Bank has elected to offset its derivative asset and liability positions, as well as cash collateral received or pledged, when the netting requirements are met. The Bank did not have any offsetting liabilities related to its securities purchased under agreements to resell for the periods presented.

The net exposure for these financial instruments can change on a daily basis; therefore, there may be a delay between the time this exposure change is identified and additional collateral is requested, and the time this collateral is received or pledged. Likewise, there may be a delay for excess collateral to be returned. For derivative instruments that meet the netting requirements, any excess cash collateral received or pledged is recognized as a derivative liability or derivative asset. Additional information regarding these agreements is provided in Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities. Based on the fair value of the related collateral held, the securities purchased under agreements to resell were fully collateralized for the periods presented.

Variable Interest Entities. The Bank’s investments in variable interest entities (VIEs) are limited to private-label residential mortgage-backed securities (PLRMBS). On an ongoing basis, the Bank performs a quarterly evaluation
to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary in any VIE. The Bank evaluated its investments in VIEs as of December 31, 2014,2017, to determine whether it is a primary beneficiary of any of these investments. The primary beneficiary is required to consolidate a VIE. The Bank determined that consolidation accounting is not required because the Bank is not the primary beneficiary of these VIEs for the periods presented. The Bank does not have the power to significantly affect the economic performance of any of these investments because it does not act as a key decision maker nor does it have the unilateral ability to replace a key decision maker. In addition, the Bank does not design, sponsor, transfer, service, or provide credit or liquidity support in any of its investments in VIEs. The Bank’s maximum loss exposure for these investments is limited to the carrying value.

Advances. The Bank reports advances (loans to members, former members or their successors, or housing associates) either at amortized cost or at fair value when the fair value option is elected. Advances carried at amortized cost are reported net of premiums, discounts (including discounts related to the Affordable Housing Program), and hedging adjustments. The Bank amortizes premiums and accretes discounts and recognizes hedging adjustments resulting from the discontinuation of a hedging relationship to interest income using a level-yield methodology. Interest on advances is credited to income as earned. For advances carried at fair value, the Bank recognizes contractual interest in interest income.

Advance Modifications. In cases in which the Bank funds an advance concurrent with or within a short period of time before or after the prepayment of a previous advance to the same member, the Bank evaluates whether the subsequent advance meets the accounting criteria to qualify as a modification of an existing advance or whether it constitutes a new advance. The Bank compares the present value of the cash flows on the subsequent advance to the present value of the cash flows remaining on the previous advance. If there is at least a 10% difference in the present value of the cash flows or if the Bank concludes that the difference between the advances is more than minor based on a qualitative assessment of the modifications made to the previous advance's contractual terms, then the subsequent advance is accounted for as a new advance. In all other instances, the subsequent advance is accounted for as a modification.

Prepayment Fees. When a borrower prepays certain advances prior to the original maturity, the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee. For certain advances with partial prepayment symmetry, the Bank may charge the

116


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit, depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid.

For prepaid advances that are hedged and meet the hedge accounting requirements, the Bank terminates the hedging relationship upon prepayment and records the associated fair value gains and losses, adjusted for the prepayment

119

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



fees, in interest income. If a new advance represents a modification of an original hedged advance, the fair value gains or losses on the advance and the prepayment fees are included in the carrying amount of the modified advance, and gains or losses and prepayment fees are amortized in interest income over the life of the modified advance using the level-yield method. If the modified advance is also hedged and the hedge meets the hedge accounting requirements, the modified advance is marked to fair value after the modification, and subsequent fair value changes are recorded in other income. If the prepayment represents an extinguishment of the original hedged advance, the prepayment fee and any fair value gain or loss are immediately recognized in interest income.

For prepaid advances that are not hedged or that are hedged but do not meet the hedge accounting requirements, the Bank records prepayment fees in interest income unless the Bank determines that the new advance represents a modification of the original advance. If the new advance represents a modification of the original advance, the prepayment fee on the original advance is deferred, recorded in the basis of the modified advance, and amortized over the life of the modified advance using the level-yield method. This amortization is recorded in interest income.

Mortgage Loans Held in Portfolio. Under the Mortgage Partnership Finance® (MPF®) Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate residential mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and FHA/VA-insured mortgage loans insured by the Federal Housing Administration (FHA) or guaranteed by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) from its participating members.members under the MPF Government product. (“Mortgage Partnership Finance” and “MPF” are registered trademarks of the FHLBank of Chicago.) Participating members originate or purchase the mortgage loans, credit-enhance them and sell them to the Bank, and generally retain the servicing of the loans. The Bank manages the interest rate risk, prepayment risk, and liquidity risk of each loan in its portfolio. The Bank and the participating financial institution (either the original participating member that sold the loans to the Bank or a successor to that member) share in the credit risk of the loans, with the Bank assuming the first loss obligation limited by the first loss account, and the participating financial institution assuming credit losses in excess of the first loss account, up to the amount of the credit enhancement obligation specified in the master agreement. The amount of the credit enhancement is calculated so that any Bank credit losses (excluding special hazard losses) in excess of the first loss account are limited to those that would be expected from an equivalent investment with a long-term credit rating of AA. AA for loans purchased prior to April 2017 and BBB for loans purchased thereafter, as determined by the MPF Program methodology.

In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra® product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. When members sell mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra, MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the loans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. (“MPF Xtra” is a registered trademark of the FHLBank of Chicago.)

For taking on the credit enhancement obligation, the Bank pays the participating financial institution a credit enhancement fee, which is calculated on the remaining unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. Depending on the specific MPF product, all or a portion of the credit enhancement fee is typically paid monthly beginning with the month after each delivery of loans. The MPF Original product provides participating financial institutions the option to receive credit enhancement fees on a monthly basis or in an upfront lump sum amount that is included in the purchase price at the time loans are sold to the Bank. The lump sum amount is approximately equivalent to the present value of the monthly credit enhancement fees that the Bank would otherwise be expected to pay over the life of the loans. The MPF Plus product also provides for a performance-based credit enhancement fee, which accrues

117


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



monthly, beginning with the month after each delivery of loans, and is paid to the participating financial institution beginning 12 months later. The performance-based credit enhancement fee will be reduced by an amount equivalent to loan losses up to the amount of the first loss account established for each master commitment. The participating financial institutions obtain supplemental mortgage insurance (SMI) to cover their credit enhancement obligations under this product. If the SMI provider's claims-paying ability rating falls below a specified level, the participating financial institution has six months to either replace the SMI policy or assume the credit enhancement obligation and fully collateralize the obligation; otherwise the Bank may choose not to pay the participating financial institution its performance-based credit enhancement fee.

The Bank classifies mortgage loans as held for investment and, accordingly, reports them at their principal amount outstanding net of unamortized premiums, unamortized credit enhancement fees paid as a lump sum at the time loans are purchased, discounts, and unrealized gains and losses from loans initially classified as mortgage loan commitments. The Bank defers and amortizes these amounts as interest income using the level-yield method on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the related mortgage loan. Actual prepayment experience and estimates of future principal prepayments are used in calculating the estimated life of the mortgage loans. The Bank aggregates the mortgage loans by similar characteristics (type, maturity, note rate, and acquisition date) in determining prepayment estimates. A retrospective adjustment is required each time the Bank changes the estimated amounts as if the new estimate had been known since the original acquisition date of the assets. The Bank uses nationally recognized, market-based, third-party prepayment models to project estimated lives.


120

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank records credit enhancement fees as a reduction to interest income.

Allowance for Credit Losses. An allowance for credit losses is a valuation allowance separately established for each identified portfolio segment, if it is probable that impairment has occurred in the Bank's portfolio as of the Statements of Condition date and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent necessary, an allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded as a liability.

Portfolio Segments. A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses. The Bank has developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses for each applicable portfolio segment.

See Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses for more information.

Impairment Methodology on Mortgage Loans. A mortgage loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Bank will be unable to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement.

Loans that are on non-accrual status and that are considered collateral-dependent are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs. Loans are considered collateral-dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property, that is, there is no other available and reliable source of repayment. Collateral-dependent loans are impaired if the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated selling costs is insufficient to recover the unpaid principal balance on the loan. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the same manner as interest income on non-accrual loans noted below.

The Bank places a mortgage loan on nonaccrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest from the participating financial institution is reported 90 days or more past due.due or when the loan is in foreclosure. When a mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income. The Bank records cash payments received on nonaccrual loans first as interest income and then as a reduction of principal as specified in the contractual agreement, unless the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful. If the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful, then cash payments received would be applied first solely to principal until the remaining principal amount due is

118


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



expected to be collected and then as a recovery of any charge-off, if applicable, followed by recording interest income. A loan on non-accrual status may be restored to accrual when (1) none of its contractual principal and interest is due and unpaid, and the Bank expects repayment of the remaining contractual interest and principal, or (2) it otherwise becomes well secured and in the process of collection. For any mortgage loans that are more than 180 days past due and that have any outstanding balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less cost to sell, this excess is charged off as a loss by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Likewise, when a borrower is in bankruptcy, loans are written down to the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, in general within 60 days of receipt of the notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, unless it can be clearly demonstrated and documented that repayment is likely to occur.

Real Estate Owned. Real estate owned (REO) includes assets that have been received in satisfaction of debt through foreclosures. REO is initially recorded at fair value less estimated selling costs and is subsequently carried at the lower of that amount or current fair value less estimated selling costs. The Bank recognizes a charge-off to the allowance for credit losses if the fair value of the REO less estimated selling costs is less than the recorded investment in the loan at the date of transfer from loans to REO. Any subsequent realized gains, realized or unrealized losses, and carrying costs are included in other non-interest expense in the Statements of Income. REO is recorded in “Other assets” in the Statements of Condition. At December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank’s other assets included $2$1 of REO resulting from foreclosure of 2311 mortgage loans held by the Bank. At December 31, 2013,2016, the Bank’s other assets included $3$1 of REO resulting from foreclosure of 2712 mortgage loans held by the Bank.

Other Fees. Letter of credit fees are recorded as other income over the term of the letter of credit.

Derivatives. All derivatives are recognized on the Statements of Condition at their fair value. The Bank has elected to report derivative assets and derivative liabilities net of cash collateral, including initial and variation margin, and accrued interest received from or pledged to futures commission merchants (clearing agents) or counterparties. The

121

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



fair values of derivatives are netted by clearing agent or counterparty when the netting requirements have been met. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset, and if negative, they are classified as a liability. Cash flows associated with derivatives are reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the Statements of Cash Flows unless the derivative meets the criteria to be a financing derivative.

Each derivative is designated as one of the following:
(1)a qualifying hedge of the change in fair value of (i) a recognized asset or liability or (ii) an unrecognized firm commitment (a fair value hedge);
(2)a qualifying hedge of (i) a forecasted transaction or (ii) the variability of cash flows that are to be received or paid in connection with a recognized asset or liability (a cash flow hedge);
(3)a non-qualifying hedge of an asset or liability for asset-liability management purposes or of certain advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option (an economic hedge); or
(4)a non-qualifying hedge of another derivative (an intermediation hedge) that is offered as a product to members or used to offset other derivatives with nonmember counterparties (an intermediation hedge).counterparties.

If hedging relationships meet certain criteria, including but not limited to formal documentation of the hedging relationship and an expectation to be hedge effective, they are eligible for hedge accounting, and the offsetting changes in fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk may be recorded in earnings. The application of hedge accounting generally requires the Bank to evaluate the effectiveness of the hedging relationships at inception and on an ongoing basis and to calculate the changes in fair value of the derivatives and the related hedged items independently. This is known as the “long-haul” method of hedge accounting. Transactions that meet certain criteria qualify for the “short-cut” method of hedge accounting, in which an assumption can be made that the change in the fair value of a hedged item, because of changes in the benchmark rate, exactly offsets the change in the value of the related derivative. Under the shortcut method, the entire change in fair value of the interest rate swap is considered to be effective at achieving offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged asset or liability.

119


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Derivatives are typically executed at the same time as the hedged item, and the Bank designates the hedged item in a qualifying hedge relationship as of the trade date. In many hedging relationships, the Bank may designate the hedging relationship upon its commitment to disburse an advance or trade a consolidated obligation in which settlement occurs within the shortest period of time possible for the type of instrument based on market settlement conventions. The Bank records the changes in the fair value of the derivatives and the hedged item beginning on the trade date.

Changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a fair value hedge and is designated as a fair value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability (hedged item) that are attributable to the hedged risk (including changes that reflect losses or gains on firm commitments), are recorded in other income as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.”

Changes in the fair value of a derivative that qualifies as a cash flow hedge and is designated as a cash flow hedge, to the extent that the hedge is effective, are recorded in AOCI, a component of capital, until earnings are affected by the variability of the cash flows of the hedged transaction (until the periodic recognition of interest on a variable rate asset or liability is recorded in earnings).

For both fair value and cash flow hedges, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represents the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differs from the change in the fair value of the hedged item or the variability in the cash flows of the forecasted transaction) is recorded in other income as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.”

Changes in the fair value of a derivative designated as an economic hedge or an intermediation hedge are recorded in current period earnings with no fair value adjustment to an asset or liability. An economic hedge is defined as a

122

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



derivative hedging certain advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option, or hedging specific or non-specific underlying assets, liabilities, or firm commitments, that does not qualify or was not designated for fair value or cash flow hedge accounting, but is an acceptable hedging strategy under the Bank's risk management program. These economic hedging strategies also comply with Finance Agency regulatory requirements prohibiting speculative hedge transactions. An economic hedge introduces the potential for earnings variability caused by the changes in fair value of the derivatives that are recorded in the Bank's income but are not offset by corresponding changes in the value of the economically hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments. The derivatives used in intermediary activities do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and are separately marked to market through earnings. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives does not significantly affect the operating results of the Bank. Changes in the fair value of these non-qualifying hedges are recorded in other income as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.” In addition, the net settlements associated with these non-qualifying hedges are recorded in other income as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.” Cash flows associated with these stand-alone derivatives are reflected as cash flows from operating activities in the Statements of Cash Flows unless the derivative meets the criteria to be designated as a financing derivative.

The net settlements of interest receivables and payables on derivatives designated as fair value or cash flow hedges are recognized as adjustments to the interest income or interest expense of the designated underlying hedged item. The net settlements of interest receivables and payables on intermediated derivatives for members and other economic hedges are recognized in other income as “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.”

The Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (ii) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period; (iv) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; (v) it determines that

120


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate; or (vi) it decides to use the derivative to offset changes in the fair value of other derivatives or instruments carried at fair value.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, the Bank either terminates the derivative or continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value, ceases to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value, and amortizes the cumulative basis adjustment on the hedged item into earnings over the remaining life of the hedged item using a level-yield methodology.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because the Bank determines that the derivative no longer qualifies as an effective cash flow hedge of an existing hedged item, the Bank continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value and reclassifies the AOCI adjustment into earnings when earnings are affected by the existing hedged item (the original forecasted transaction).

Under limited circumstances, when the Bank discontinues cash flow hedge accounting because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur by the end of the originally specified time period, or within the following two months, but it is probable the transaction will still occur in the future, the gain or loss on the derivative remains in AOCI and is recognized in earnings when the forecasted transaction affects earnings. However, if it is probable that a forecasted transaction will not occur by the end of the originally specified time period or within the following two months, the gains and losses that were recorded in AOCI are recognized immediately in earnings.

When hedge accounting is discontinued because the hedged item no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment, the Bank continues to carry the derivative on the Statements of Condition at its fair value, removing from the Statements of Condition any asset or liability that was recorded to recognize the firm commitment and recording it as a gain or loss in current period earnings.


123

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank may be the primary obligor on consolidated obligations and may make advances in which derivative instruments are embedded. Upon execution of these transactions, the Bank assesses whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the advance or debt (the host contract) and whether a separate, non-embedded instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument. When it is determined that: (i) the embedded derivative has economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract, and (ii) a separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and designated as a stand-alone derivative instrument equivalent to an economic hedge. However, the entire contract is carried on the Statements of Condition at fair value and no portion of the contract is designated as a hedging instrument if the entire contract (the host contract and the embedded derivative) is to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in current period earnings (such as an investment security classified as trading, as well as hybrid financial instruments that are eligible for the fair value option), or if the Bank cannot reliably identify and measure the embedded derivative for purposes of separating the derivative from its host contract.

Premises, Software, and Equipment. The Bank records premises, software, and equipment at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. The Bank's accumulated depreciation and amortization related to premises, software, and equipment totaled $67$74 and $67$61 at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively. Improvements and major renewals are capitalized; ordinary maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed on the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of assets ranging from 3 to 10 years, and leasehold improvements are amortized on the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the improvement or the remaining term of the lease, whichever is shorter. Depreciation and amortization expense was $9$16 for 2014, $92017, $12 for 2013,2016, and $10$8 for 2012. The2015.


121


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank includes gains and losses on disposal of premises, software, and equipment in other income. The net realized gain on disposal of premises, software, and equipment, primarily relatedSan Francisco
Notes to the 1999 sale of the Bank's building, was $1, $1, and $1 in 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.Financial Statements (continued)



The cost of computer software developed or obtained for internal use is capitalized and depreciated over future periods. At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Bank had $20$10 and $20$17 in unamortized computer software costs respectively. Depreciation of computer software costs charged to expense was $7, $7,$9, $8, and $9$6 in 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively.

Consolidated Obligations. Consolidated obligations are recorded at amortized cost unless the Bank has elected the fair value option, in which case the consolidated obligations are carried at fair value.

Concessions on Consolidated Obligations. Concessions are paid to dealers in connection with the issuance of consolidated obligations for which the Bank is the primary obligor. The amount of the concession is allocated to the Bank by the Office of Finance based on the percentage of the debt issued for which the Bank is the primary obligor. Concessions paid on consolidated obligations designated under the fair value option are expensed as incurred.incurred in non-interest expense. Concessions paid on consolidated obligations not designated under the fair value option are deferred and amortized to expense using the level-yield method over the remaining contractual life or on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the consolidated obligations. Unamortized concessions were $12 and $14 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and are included in “Other assets.” Amortization of concessions is included in consolidated obligation interest expense and totaled $6, $13, and $7, in 2017, 2016, and $22, in 2014, 2013, and 2012,2015, respectively.

Discounts and Premiums on Consolidated Obligations. The discounts on consolidated obligation discount notes for which the Bank is the primary obligor are amortized to expense using the level-yield method over the term to maturity. The discounts and premiums on consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank is the primary obligor are amortized to expense using the level-yield method over the remaining contractual life or on a retrospective basis over the estimated life of the consolidated obligation bonds.


124

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The Bank reclassifies the capital stock subject to redemption from capital to a liability after a member provides the Bank with a written notice of redemption; gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member's Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity, resulting in the member's shares then meeting the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Shares meeting this definition are reclassified to a liability at fair value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reflected as interest expense in the Statements of Income. The repayment of these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments (by repurchase or redemption of the shares) is reflected as a financing cash outflow in the Statements of Cash Flows once settled. See Note 15 – Capital for more information.

If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal or if the Bank allows the transfer of mandatorily redeemable capital stock to a member, the Bank reclassifies mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to capital. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock are no longer classified as interest expense.

Finance Agency Expenses. The FHLBanks fund a portion of the costs of operating the Finance Agency, and each FHLBank is assessed a proportionate share of those costs. The Finance Agency allocates its expenses and working capital fund among the FHLBanks based on the ratio between each FHLBank's minimum required regulatory capital and the aggregate minimum required regulatory capital of all the FHLBanks.

Office of Finance Expenses. Each FHLBank is assessed a proportionate share of the cost of operating the Office of Finance, which facilitates the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations. The Office of Finance allocates its operating and capital expenditures among the FHLBanks as follows: (1) two-thirds of the assessment is based on each FHLBank's share of total consolidated obligations outstanding, and (2) one-third of the assessment is based on an equal pro rata allocation.

Affordable Housing Program. As more fully discussed in Note 13 – Affordable Housing Program, the FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish and fund an Affordable Housing Program (AHP). The Bank charges the

122


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



required funding for the AHP to earnings and establishes a liability. The AHP funds provide subsidies to members to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances.

Gains on Litigation Settlements, Net. Litigation settlement gains, net of related legal expenses, are recorded in Other Income/(Loss) in “Gains on litigation settlements, net” in the Statements of Income. A litigation settlement gain is considered realized and recorded when the Bank receives cash or assets that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash or claims to cash. In addition, a litigation settlement gain is considered realizable and recorded when the Bank enters into a signed agreement that is not subject to appeal, where the counterparty has the ability to pay, and the amount to be received can be reasonably estimated. Prior to being realized or realizable, the Bank considers potential litigation settlement gains to be gain contingencies, and therefore they are not recorded in the Statements of Income. The related legal expenses are contingent-based fees and are only incurred and recorded upon a litigation settlement gain.

Note 2 — Recently Issued and Adopted Accounting Guidance

AmendmentsTargeted Improvements to the Consolidation Guidance.Accounting for Hedging Activities. On February 18, 2015,August 28, 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued amended guidance intended to enhance consolidationimprove the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. This guidance requires that, for legal entities such as limited partnerships, limited liability corporations,fair value hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness be presented in the same income statement line that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item. For cash flow hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness must be recorded in other comprehensive income. In addition, the amendments include certain targeted improvements to the assessment of hedge effectiveness and securitization structures (collateralized debt obligations, collateralized loan obligations, and mortgage-backed security transactions). The new guidance primarily focuses onpermit, among other things, the following:
Placing more emphasisMeasurement of the change in fair value of the hedged item on the basis of the benchmark rate component of the contractual coupon cash flows determined at hedge inception.
Measurement of the hedged item in a partial-term fair value hedge of interest rate risk by assuming the hedged item has a term that reflects only the designated cash flows being hedged.
Consideration only of how changes in the benchmark interest rate affect a decision to settle a prepayable instrument before its scheduled maturity in calculating the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to interest rate risk.
For a cash flow hedge of interest rate risk of loss when determining a controllingvariable-rate financial interest. A reporting organization may no longer haveinstrument, an entity could designate as the hedged risk the variability in cash flows attributable to consolidate a legal entity in certain circumstances based solely on its fee arrangement, when certain criteria are met.
Reducing the frequency of the application of related-party guidance when determining a controlling financialcontractually specified interest in a VIE.
Changing consolidation conclusions for public and private companies in several industries that typically make use of limited partnerships or VIEs.rate.

This guidance becomes effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015,on January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. Thispermitted. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. The Bank does not expectedintend to affectadopt this guidance early. The Bank is in the process of evaluating this guidance, and its effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and financial statement disclosures has not yet been determined.

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities. On March 30, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to shorten the amortization period for certain purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. This guidance affects all entities that hold investments in callable debt securities that have an amortized cost basis in excess of the amount that is repayable by the issuer at the earliest call date (that is, at a premium). This guidance is effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019, and early adoption is permitted. This guidance should be applied using a modified retrospective method through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to have any effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.


125123


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



DisclosureImproving the Presentation of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern.Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost. On August 27, 2014,March 10, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance about management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s abilityimprove the presentation of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost. The amendments require that employer disaggregate the service cost component from the other components of net benefit cost. The amendments also provide explicit guidance on how to continue as a going concernpresent the service cost component and to provide related footnote disclosures.the other components of net benefit cost in the Statements of Income. This guidance requires management to performbecame effective for the Bank for interim and annual assessmentsperiods beginning on January 1, 2018, and was adopted retrospectively for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net periodic pension cost and net periodic postretirement benefit cost in the Statements of Income. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, and financial statement disclosures.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. On August 26, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify guidance on the classification of certain cash receipts and payments in the Statements of Cash Flows. This guidance is intended to reduce existing diversity in practice in how certain cash receipts and cash payments are presented and classified on the Statements of Cash Flows. This guidance became effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance did not have any effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance for the accounting for credit losses on financial instruments. The amendments require entities to measure expected credit losses based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate under the circumstances. In addition, under the new guidance, a financial asset, or a group of financial assets, is required to be measured at its amortized cost to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected over the contractual term of the financial assets. Among other things, the guidance also requires:
The Statement of Income to reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period.
The entities to determine the allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination that are measured at amortized cost basis in a similar manner to other financial assets measured at amortized cost basis. The initial allowance for credit losses is required to be added to the purchase price.
Credit losses relating to available-for-sale debt securities to be recorded through an entity’sallowance for credit losses. The amendments limit the allowance for credit losses to the amount by which fair value is below amortized cost.
Public entities to further disaggregate the current disclosure of credit quality indicators in relation to the amortized cost of financing receivables by the year of origination (i.e., vintage).

The guidance is effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. Early application is permitted as of the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018. The guidance should be applied using a modified-retrospective approach, through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. In addition, the entities are required to use a prospective transition approach for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination and for debt securities for which an other-than-temporary impairment had been recognized before the effective date. The Bank does not intend to adopt the guidance early. The Bank is in the process of evaluating this guidance and expects the adoption of the guidance may result in an increase in the allowance for credit losses given the requirement to assess losses for the entire estimated life of the financial asset, including an allowance for debt securities. The effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows will depend on the composition of financial assets held by the Bank at the adoption date, as well as on economic conditions and forecasts at that time.


124


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Contingent Put and Call Options in Debt Instruments. On March 14, 2016, the FASB issued amendments to clarify the requirements for assessing whether contingent call (put) options that can accelerate the payment of principal on debt instruments are clearly and closely related to their debt hosts. The guidance requires entities to apply only the four-step decision sequence when assessing whether the economic characteristics and risks of call (put) options are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics and risks of their debt hosts. Consequently, when a call (put) option is contingently exercisable, an entity does not have to assess whether the event that triggers the ability to continue asexercise a going concern within one year after the date the financial statements are issuedcall (put) option is related to interest rates or within one year after the financial statements are available to be issued, when applicable. Substantial doubt exists if it is probable that the entity will be unable to meet its obligations for the assessed period.credit risks. This guidance becomesbecame effective for the Bank for the interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2016, and early application is permitted. Thisbeginning on January 1, 2017. The adoption of this guidance is not expected to affecthad no effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

ClassificationEffect of Certain Government-Guaranteed Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.Derivative Contract Novations on Existing Hedge Accounting Relationships. On August 8, 2014,March 10, 2016, the FASB issued amendedamendments to clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under U.S. GAAP does not, in and of itself, require dedesignation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. This guidance relating tobecame effective for the classificationBank for the interim and measurement of certain government-guaranteed mortgage loans upon foreclosure.annual periods beginning on January 1, 2017, and early adoption was permitted. The amendments inprovide entities with the option to apply the guidance using either a prospective approach or a modified retrospective approach, retrospectively applied to all derivative instruments that meet the specific conditions. The Bank elected to early adopt the guidance prospectively on January 1, 2016. The adoption of this guidance requirehad no effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

Recognition of Lease Assets and Lease Liabilities. On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the Statements of Condition and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. In particular, this guidance requires a mortgage loan be derecognizedlessee of operating or finance leases to recognize on the Statements of Condition a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. However, for leases with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities. Under previous U.S. GAAP, a lessee was not required to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities arising from operating leases on the Statements of Condition. While this guidance does not fundamentally change lessor accounting, some changes have been made to align that a separateguidance with the lessee guidance and other receivable be recognized upon foreclosure if certain conditions are met. Thisareas within U.S. GAAP.

The guidance becomes effective for the Bank for the interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014,on January 1, 2019, and may be adoptedearly application is permitted. The guidance requires lessors and lessees to recognize and measure leases at the beginning of the earliest period presented in the financial statements using either thea modified retrospective transition method or the prospective transition method.approach. The adoption ofBank does not intend to adopt this guidance did not affectearly. Upon adoption, the Bank expects to report higher assets and liabilities as a result of recording right-of-use assets and lease liabilities for its existing leases on the Statements of Condition. The Bank is in the process of evaluating this guidance, but its effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, orand cash flows.flows is not expected to be material.

Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financings,Recognition and Disclosures.Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. On June 12, 2014,January 5, 2016, the FASB issued amended guidance on certain aspects of recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. This guidance includes, but is not limited to, the following:
Requires equity investments (with certain exceptions) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income;
Requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument-specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for repurchase-to-maturity transactionsfinancial instruments;
Requires separate presentation of financial assets and repurchase agreements executed as repurchase financings. Specifically, this guidance requiresfinancial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset on the Statement of Condition or in the accompanying notes to the financial statements;

125


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Eliminates the requirement for public entities to accountdisclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for (1) repurchase-to-maturity transactions as secured borrowings rather than as sales with forward repurchase agreements; and (2) repurchase agreements executed contemporaneously withfinancial instruments measured at amortized cost on the initial transferStatement of the underlying financial asset with the same counterparty as separate transactions only. In addition, thisCondition.

The guidance requires a transferor to disclose additional information about certain transactions, including those in which it retains substantially all of the exposure to the economic returns of the underlying transferred asset over the transaction’s term. This guidance becomesbecame effective for the Bank for the first interim orand annual periodperiods beginning after December 15, 2014. The changes in accounting for transactions outstanding on the effective date are required to be presented on a cumulative-effect basis.January 1, 2018. The adoption of this guidance affected the Bank’s disclosures. However, the requirement to present the instrument-specific credit risk in other comprehensive income did not affecthave any effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, orand cash flows.

Revenue from Contracts with Customers. On May 28, 2014, the FASB issued its guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. This guidance outlines a comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting forrecognizing revenue arising from contracts with customers and supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance. In addition, this guidance amends the existing requirements for the recognition of a gain or loss on the transfer of non-financial assets that are not in a contract with a customer. This guidance applies to all contracts with customers except those that are within the scope of certain other standards, such as financial instruments, certain guarantees, insurance contracts, orand lease contracts.

This guidance becomes effective for the interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and early application is not permitted. The guidance provides the entities with the option of using either of the following two methods upon adoption:adoption methods: a full retrospective method, applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period presented; or a transitionmodified retrospective method, with the cumulative effect of retrospectively applying this guidance recognized at the date of initial application. The Bank is

On August 12, 2015, the FASB issued an amendment to defer the effective date of the guidance issued in May 2014 by one year. In 2016 and 2017, the FASB issued additional amendments to clarify certain aspects of the new revenue guidance. However, the amendments do not change the core principle in the processnew revenue standard. The guidance became effective for the Bank for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2018. Given that the majority of evaluatingthe Bank’s financial instruments and other contractual rights that generate revenue are covered by other accounting guidance under U.S. GAAP, the effect of this guidance on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows but it iswas not expected to be material.

Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure. On January 17, 2014, theFASB issued guidance clarifying when consumer mortgage loans collateralized by real estate should be reclassified to REO. Specifically, these collateralized mortgage loans should be reclassified to REO when either the creditor obtains legal title to the residential real estate property upon completion of a foreclosure or the borrower conveys all interest in the residential real estate property to the creditor to satisfy the loan through completion of a deed in lieu of foreclosure or through a similar legal agreement. The guidance is effective for interim and annual periods beginning on or after December 15, 2014, and may be adopted under either the modified

126

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



retrospective transition method or the prospective transition method. The adoption of this guidance did not affect the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Joint and Several Liability Arrangements. On February 28, 2013, the FASB issued guidance for the recognition, measurement, and disclosure of obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date. The guidance requires an entity to measure these obligations as the sum of (1) the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and (2) any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. In addition, the guidance requires an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligations as well as other information about the obligations. The guidance became effective for interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2014, and was applied retrospectively to obligations with joint and several liabilities existing at January 1, 2014. The adoption of this guidance did not affect the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Regulatory Guidance

Framework for Adversely Classifying Loans, Other Real Estate Owned, and Other Assets and Listing Assets for Special Mention.On April 9, 2012, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2012-02, Framework for Adversely Classifying Loans, Other Real Estate Owned, and Other Assets and Listing Assets for Special Mention (AB 2012-02). The guidance establishes a standard and uniform methodology for classifying loans, other real estate owned, and certain other assets (excluding investment securities) and prescribes the timing of asset charge-offs based on these classifications. The guidance is generally consistent with the Uniform Retail Credit Classification and Account Management Policy issued by the federal banking regulators in June 2000. The Bank implemented the asset classification provisions as of January 1, 2014, and this adoption did not have any impact on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows. The charge-off provisions were implemented on January 1, 2015, and resulted in a $1 charge-off to the Bank’s allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio. The adoption of these charge-off provisions did not have a material effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 3 — Cash and Due from Banks

Cash on hand, cash items in the process of collection, and amounts due from correspondent banks and the Federal Reserve Bank are included in Cash and due from banks on the Statements of Condition.

Compensating Balances. Cash and due from banks includes certain compensating balances, whereThethe Bank maintains collected cash balances with commercial banks in consideration for certain services. There are no legal restrictions under these agreements on the withdrawal of these funds. The average collected cash balances were approximately $2$30 for 20142017 and $1$44 for 2013.2016.



126


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 4 — Trading Securities

The estimated fair value of trading securities as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, was as follows:

2014
 2013
December 31, 2017
 December 31, 2016
GSEs – Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds$3,513
 $3,194
Government-Sponsored Enterprises (GSEs) – Federal Farm Credit Bank (FFCB) bonds$1,158
 $2,058
MBS – Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae11
 14
6
 8
Total$3,524
 $3,208
$1,164
 $2,066

The net unrealized gain/(loss) on trading securities was $(1), $2,de minimis, $4, and $(11)$(2) for the years ended December 31, 2014, 20132017, and 2012,2016, and 2015, respectively. These amounts represent the changes in the fair value of the securities during the reported periods.


127

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 5 — Available-for-Sale Securities

Available-for-sale (AFS) securities by major security type as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, were as follows:
 
December 31, 2014         
December 31, 2017         
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized in
AOCI

 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Estimated Fair Value
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized in
AOCI

 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Estimated Fair Value
PLRMBS:                  
Prime$565
 $(4) $31
 $
 $592
$335
 $
 $29
 $
 $364
Alt-A, option ARM1,031
 (43) 77
 
 1,065
714
 (10) 130
 
 834
Alt-A, other4,687
 (145) 174
 (2) 4,714
2,447
 (23) 211
 
 2,635
Total$6,283
 $(192) $282
 $(2) $6,371
$3,496
 $(33) $370
 $
 $3,833
         
December 31, 2013         
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized in
AOCI

 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Estimated Fair Value
PLRMBS:         
Prime$661
 $(11) 27
 $
 $677
Alt-A, option ARM1,122
 (74) 51
 
 1,099
Alt-A, other5,376
 (239) 142
 (8) 5,271
Total$7,159
 $(324) $220
 $(8) $7,047

December 31, 2016         
 
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized in
AOCI

 
Gross
Unrealized
Gains

 
Gross
Unrealized
Losses

 Estimated Fair Value
PLRMBS:         
Prime$413
 $(1) $22
 $
 $434
Alt-A, option ARM853
 (31) 77
 (2) 897
Alt-A, other3,087
 (82) 154
 (1) 3,158
Total$4,353
 $(114) $253
 $(3) $4,489

(1)
Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and previous OTTI recognized in earnings.

Expected maturities of PLRMBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers generally have the right to prepay the underlying obligations without prepayment fees.

At December 31, 20142017, the amortized cost of the Bank’s PLRMBS classified as AFS included credit-related OTTI of $1,173801. At December 31, 20132016, the amortized cost of the Bank’s PLRMBS classified as AFS included credit-related OTTI of $1,312941.

The following table summarizes the AFS securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016. The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. Total unrealized losses in the following table will not agree to total gross unrealized losses in the table above. The unrealized losses in the following table also include non-credit-related OTTI losses recognized in AOCI. For OTTI analysis of AFS securities, see Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.


128127


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



OTTI losses recognized in AOCI. For OTTI analysis of AFS securities, see Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.

December 31, 2014           
December 31, 2017           
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More TotalLess Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

PLRMBS:                      
Prime$71
 $3
 $36
 $1
 $107
 $4
$
 $
 $11
 $
 $11
 $
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 580
 43
 580
 43

 
 144
 10
 144
 10
Alt-A, other403
 12
 1,682
 135
 2,085
 147
5
 
 356
 23
 361
 23
Total$474
 $15
 $2,298
 $179
 $2,772
 $194
$5
 $
 $511
 $33
 $516
 $33
           
December 31, 2013     
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

PLRMBS:           
Prime$28
 $
 $287
 $11
 $315
 $11
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 674
 74
 674
 74
Alt-A, other677
 10
 2,351
 237
 3,028
 247
Total$705
 $10
 $3,312
 $322
 $4,017
 $332
December 31, 2016     
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

PLRMBS:           
Prime$
 $
 $14
 $1
 $14
 $1
Alt-A, option ARM14
 
 249
 33
 263
 33
Alt-A, other57
 
 1,048
 83
 1,105
 83
Total$71
 $
 $1,311
 $117
 $1,382
 $117

As indicated in the tables above, as of December 31, 20142017, the Bank’s investments classified as AFS had unrealized losses related to PLRMBS, which were primarily due to illiquidity in the PLRMBS market uncertainty about the future condition of the housing and mortgage markets and the economy, and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their acquisitionamortized cost.

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for AFS securities at December 31, 2014 and 2013, are shown in the following table:

  
2014
 2013
Amortized cost of AFS PLRMBS:   
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Fixed rate$1,917
 $2,450
Adjustable rate4,366
 4,709
Total$6,283
 $7,159

Certain MBS classified as fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations have an initial fixed interest rate that subsequently converts to an adjustable interest rate on a specified date as follows:

 2014
 2013
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Converts in 1 year or less$71
 $191
Converts after 1 year through 5 years226
 364
Total$297
 $555

See Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis for information on the transfers of securities between the AFS portfolio and the HTM portfolio.



129128


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 6 — Held-to-Maturity Securities

The Bank classifies the following securities as HTM because the Bank has the positive intent and ability to hold these securities to maturity:
 
December 31, 2014           
December 31, 2017           
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Certificates of deposit$500
 $
 $500
 $
 $
 $500
Housing finance agency bonds:                      
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds$328
 $
 $328
 $
 $(45) $283
187
 
 187
 
 (9) 178
MBS:                      
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae1,513
 
 1,513
 15
 (2) 1,526
GSEs:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:           
Ginnie Mae751
 
 751
 1
 (1) 751
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac4,517
 
 4,517
 61
 (12) 4,566
2,039
 
 2,039
 12
 (15) 2,036
Fannie Mae5,313
 
 5,313
 121
 (6) 5,428
3,600
 
 3,600
 34
 (8) 3,626
Subtotal GSEs – single-family5,639
 
 5,639
 46
 (23) 5,662
GSEs – multifamily:

           
Freddie Mac4,651
 
 4,651
 6
 (6) 4,651
Fannie Mae2,131
 
 2,131
 2
 
 2,133
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily
6,782
 
 6,782
 8
 (6) 6,784
Subtotal GSEs9,830
 
 9,830
 182
 (18) 9,994
12,421
 
 12,421
 54
 (29) 12,446
PLRMBS:                      
Prime1,133
 
 1,133
 1
 (27) 1,107
521
 
 521
 5
 (6) 520
Alt-A, option ARM14
 
 14
 
 (1) 13
Alt-A, other753
 (20) 733
 19
 (18) 734
306
 (6) 300
 11
 (2) 309
Subtotal PLRMBS1,900
 (20) 1,880
 20
 (46) 1,854
827
 (6) 821
 16
 (8) 829
Total MBS13,243
 (20) 13,223
 217
 (66) 13,374
13,999
 (6) 13,993
 71
 (38) 14,026
Total$13,571
 $(20) $13,551
 $217
 $(111) $13,657
$14,686
 $(6) $14,680
 $71
 $(47) $14,704
 

129


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2013           
December 31, 2016           
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Amortized
Cost(1)

 
OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 
Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Certificates of deposit$1,660
 $
 $1,660
 $
 $
 $1,660
$1,350
 $
 $1,350
 $
 $
 $1,350
Housing finance agency bonds:                      
CalHFA bonds416
 
 416
 
 (100) 316
Subtotal2,076
 
 2,076
 
 (100) 1,976
California Housing Finance Agency (CalHFA) bonds225
 
 225
 
 (18) 207
MBS:                      
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae1,575
 
 1,575
 3
 (45) 1,533
GSEs:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:      ��    
Ginnie Mae951
 
 951
 5
 (1) 955
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac5,250
 
 5,250
 53
 (90) 5,213
2,793
 
 2,793
 23
 (15) 2,801
Fannie Mae6,331
 
 6,331
 109
 (45) 6,395
5,037
 
 5,037
 47
 (14) 5,070
Subtotal GSEs – single-family7,830
 
 7,830
 70
 (29) 7,871
GSEs – multifamily:           
Freddie Mac1,556
 
 1,556
 
 (1) 1,555
Fannie Mae1,058
 
 1,058
 
 (1) 1,057
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily2,614
 
 2,614
 
 (2) 2,612
Subtotal GSEs11,581
 
 11,581
 162
 (135) 11,608
10,444
 
 10,444
 70
 (31) 10,483
PLRMBS:                      
Prime1,380
 
 1,380
 1
 (37) 1,344
707
 
 707
 2
 (15) 694
Alt-A, option ARM16
 
 16
 
 (2) 14
Alt-A, other906
 (27) 879
 24
 (26) 877
459
 (9) 450
 11
 (9) 452
Subtotal PLRMBS2,302
 (27) 2,275
 25
 (65) 2,235
1,166
 (9) 1,157
 13
 (24) 1,146
Total MBS15,458
 (27) 15,431
 190
 (245) 15,376
12,561
 (9) 12,552
 88
 (56) 12,584
Total$17,534
 $(27) $17,507
 $190
 $(345) $17,352
$14,136

$(9)
$14,127

$88

$(74)
$14,141

(1)
Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and previous OTTI recognized in earnings. The carrying value of HTM securities represents amortized cost after adjustment for non-credit-related OTTI recognized in AOCI.


130

TableAt December 31, 2017, the amortized cost of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bankthe Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




$19, discounts of $24, and credit-related OTTI of $7. At December 31, 20142016, the amortized cost of the Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of $5129, discounts of $5534, and credit-related OTTI of $7. At December 31, 2013, the amortized cost of the Bank’s MBS classified as HTM included premiums of $71, discounts of $70, and credit-related OTTI of $68.

The following tables summarize the HTM securities with unrealized losses as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016. The unrealized losses are aggregated by major security type and the length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. Total unrealized losses in the following table will not agree to the total gross unrecognized holding losses in the table above. The unrealized losses in the following table also include non-credit-related OTTI losses recognized in AOCI. For OTTI analysis of HTM securities, see Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis.


December 31, 2014           
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Housing finance agency bonds:           
CalHFA bonds$
 $
 $283
 $45
 $283
 $45
MBS:           
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae131
 
 94
 2
 225
 2
GSEs:           
Freddie Mac622
 1
 1,044
 11
 1,666
 12
Fannie Mae286
 1
 562
 5
 848
 6
Subtotal GSEs908
 2
 1,606
 16
 2,514
 18
PLRMBS:           
Prime264
 2
 682
 25
 946
 27
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 13
 1
 13
 1
Alt-A, other30
 
 685
 38
 715
 38
Subtotal PLRMBS294
 2
 1,380
 64
 1,674
 66
Total MBS1,333
 4
 3,080
 82
 4,413
 86
Total$1,333
 $4
 $3,363
 $127
 $4,696
 $131
130

131

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2013           
December 31, 2017           
Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More TotalLess Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Housing finance agency bonds:                      
CalHFA bonds$
 $
 $316
 $100
 $316
 $100
$
 $
 $178
 $9
 $178
 $9
MBS:                      
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae1,187
 45
 2
 
 1,189
 45
GSEs:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:           
Ginnie Mae406
 1
 
 
 406
 1
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac2,918
 89
 66
 1
 2,984
 90
895
 9
 323
 6
 1,218
 15
Fannie Mae2,069
 40
 126
 5
 2,195
 45
702
 4
 205
 4
 907
 8
Subtotal GSEs – single-family1,597
 13
 528
 10
 2,125
 23
GSEs – multifamily:           
Freddie Mac1,058
 6
 
 
 1,058
 6
Fannie Mae456
 
 
 
 456
 
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily

1,514
 6
 
 
 1,514
 6
Subtotal GSEs4,987
 129
 192
 6
 5,179
 135
3,111
 19
 528
 10
 3,639
 29
PLRMBS:                      
Prime481
 5
 693
 32
 1,174
 37
2
 
 202
 6
 204
 6
Alt-A, option ARM
 
 14
 2
 14
 2
Alt-A, other159
 2
 688
 51
 847
 53
15
 
 191
 8
 206
 8
Subtotal PLRMBS640
 7
 1,395
 85
 2,035
 92
17
 
 393
 14
 410
 14
Total MBS6,814
 181
 1,589
 91
 8,403
 272
3,534
 20
 921
 24
 4,455
 44
Total$6,814
 $181
 $1,905
 $191
 $8,719
 $372
$3,534
 $20
 $1,099
 $33
 $4,633
 $53
December 31, 2016           
 Less Than 12 Months 12 Months or More Total
 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unrealized
Losses

Housing finance agency bonds:           
CalHFA bonds$
 $
 $193
 $18
 $193
 $18
MBS:           
Other U.S. obligations – single-family:           
Ginnie Mae190
 1
 
 
 190
 1
GSEs – single-family:           
Freddie Mac1,498
 15
 3
 
 1,501
 15
Fannie Mae2,665
 12
 96
 2
 2,761
 14
Subtotal GSEs – single-family4,163
 27
 99
 2
 4,262
 29
GSEs – multifamily:           
Freddie Mac1,007
 1
 
 
 1,007
 1
Fannie Mae387
 1
 
 
 387
 1
Subtotal GSEs – multifamily1,394
 2
 
 
 1,394
 2
Subtotal GSEs5,557
 29
 99
 2
 5,656
 31
PLRMBS:           
Prime1
 
 517
 15
 518
 15
Alt-A, other
 
 452
 18
 452
 18
Subtotal PLRMBS1
 
 969
 33
 970
 33
Total MBS5,748
 30
 1,068
 35
 6,816
 65
Total$5,748
 $30
 $1,261
 $53
 $7,009
 $83

131


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




As indicated in the tables above, the Bank’s investments classified as HTM had unrealized losses primarily related toon CalHFA bonds and MBS. The unrealized losses associated with the CalHFA bonds were mainly due to an illiquid market, credit concerns regarding the underlying mortgage collateral, and credit concerns regarding the monoline insurance providers, causing these investments to be valued at a discount to their acquisition cost. For its agency MBS, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities because the Bank determined that the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. The unrealized losses associated with the PLRMBS were primarily due to illiquidity in the PLRMBS market uncertainty about the future condition of the housing and mortgage markets and the economy, and market expectations of the credit performance of the loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their acquisitionamortized cost.

Redemption Terms. The amortized cost, carrying value, and estimated fair value of non-MBS securities by contractual maturity (based on contractual final principal payment) and of MBS as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, are shown below. Expected maturities of MBS will differ from contractual maturities because borrowers generally have the right to prepay the underlying obligations without prepayment fees.


132

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2014     
Year of Contractual Maturity
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Estimated
Fair Value

HTM securities other than MBS:     
Due after 5 years through 10 years$78

$78
 $70
Due after 10 years250
 250
 213
Subtotal328
 328
 283
MBS:     
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae1,513
 1,513
 1,526
GSEs:     
Freddie Mac4,517
 4,517
 4,566
Fannie Mae5,313
 5,313
 5,428
Subtotal GSEs9,830
 9,830
 9,994
PLRMBS:     
Prime1,133
 1,133
 1,107
Alt-A, option ARM14
 14
 13
Alt-A, other753
 733
 734
Subtotal PLRMBS1,900
 1,880
 1,854
Total MBS13,243
 13,223
 13,374
Total$13,571
 $13,551
 $13,657
December 31, 2017     
Year of Contractual Maturity
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Estimated
Fair Value

HTM securities other than MBS:     
Due in 1 year or less$500
 $500
 $500
Due after 5 years through 10 years12
 12
 12
Due after 10 years175
 175
 166
Subtotal687
 687
 678
MBS13,999
 13,993
 14,026
Total$14,686
 $14,680
 $14,704
 
December 31, 2013     
Year of Contractual Maturity
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Estimated
Fair Value

HTM securities other than MBS:     
Due in 1 year or less$1,660
 $1,660
 $1,660
Due after 5 years through 10 years62
 62
 49
Due after 10 years354
 354
 267
Subtotal2,076
 2,076
 1,976
MBS:     
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae1,575
 1,575
 1,533
GSEs:     
Freddie Mac5,250
 5,250
 5,213
Fannie Mae6,331
 6,331
 6,395
Subtotal GSEs11,581
 11,581
 11,608
PLRMBS:     
Prime1,380
 1,380
 1,344
Alt-A, option ARM16
 16
 14
Alt-A, other906
 879
 877
Subtotal PLRMBS2,302
 2,275
 2,235
Total MBS15,458
 15,431
 15,376
Total$17,534
 $17,507
 $17,352
December 31, 2016     
Year of Contractual Maturity
Amortized
Cost(1)

 
Carrying
Value(1)

 
Estimated
Fair Value

HTM securities other than MBS:     
Due in 1 year or less$1,350
 $1,350
 $1,350
Due after 5 years through 10 years35
 35
 34
Due after 10 years190
 190
 173
Subtotal1,575
 1,575
 1,557
MBS12,561
 12,552
 12,584
Total$14,136
 $14,127
 $14,141

(1)Amortized cost includes unpaid principal balance, unamortized premiums and discounts, and previous OTTI recognized in earnings. The carrying value of HTM securities represents amortized cost after adjustment for non-credit-related OTTI recognized in AOCI.

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for HTM securities at December 31, 2014 and 2013, are detailed in the following table:

133

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



  
2014
 2013
Amortized cost of HTM securities other than MBS:   
Fixed rate$

$1,660
Adjustable rate328

416
Subtotal328

2,076
Amortized cost of HTM MBS:   
Passthrough securities:   
Fixed rate285

461
Adjustable rate415

430
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Fixed rate9,249

10,820
Adjustable rate3,294

3,747
Subtotal13,243

15,458
Total$13,571

$17,534

Certain MBS classified as fixed rate passthrough securities and fixed rate collateralized mortgage obligations have an initial fixed interest rate that subsequently converts to an adjustable interest rate on a specified date as follows:

 2014
 2013
Passthrough securities:   
Converts in 1 year or less$79
 $62
Converts after 1 year through 5 years140
 316
Converts after 5 years through 10 years59
 72
Total$278
 $450
Collateralized mortgage obligations:   
Converts in 1 year or less$73
 $185
Converts after 1 year through 5 years26
 133
Total$99
 $318

See Note 7 – Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis for information on the transfers of securities between the AFS portfolio and the HTM portfolio.

Note 7 — Other-Than-Temporary Impairment Analysis

On a quarterly basis, the Bank evaluates its individual AFS and HTM investment securities in an unrealized loss position for OTTI.

PLRMBS. To assess whether it expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of its PLRMBS, the Bank performed a cash flow analysis for all of its PLRMBS as of December 31, 2014,2017, using two third-party models. The first model projects prepayments, default rates, and loss severities on the underlying loan collateral based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributesOTTI Governance Committee of the loans underlying the Bank’s securities, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. A significant input to the first model is the forecast of future housing price changes for the relevant states and core-based statistical areas (CBSAs), which are based on an assessment of the regional housing markets. CBSA refers collectively to metropolitan and micropolitan statistical areas as defined by the U.S. Office of Management and Budget. As currently defined, a CBSA must contain at least one urban area with a population of 10,000 or more people.

The FHLBanks’ OTTI Governance CommitteeFederal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) developed a short-term housing price forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 4.0% to an increase of 7.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1,

134132


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



2014.forecast with projected changes ranging from a decrease of 5.0% to an increase of 12.0% over the 12-month period beginning October 1, 2017. For the vast majority of markets, the projected short-term housing price changes range from a decreasean increase of 1.0%2.0% to an increase of 6.0%. Thereafter, a unique path is projected for each geographic area based on an internally developed framework derived from historical data.

The month-by-month projections of future loan performance derived from the first model, which reflect projected prepayments, default rates, and loss severities, are then input into a second model that allocates the projected loan level cash flows and losses to the various security classes in each securitization structure in accordance with the structure’s prescribed cash flow and loss allocation rules. When the credit enhancement for the senior securities in a securitization is derived from the presence of subordinated securities, losses are generally allocated first to the subordinated securities until their principal balance is reduced to zero. The projected cash flows are based on a number of assumptions and expectations, and the results of these models can vary significantly with changes in assumptions and expectations. The scenario of cash flows determined based on the model approach described above reflects a best-estimate scenario and includes a base case housing price forecast that reflects the expectations for near- and long-term housing price behavior.

At each quarter end, the Bank compares the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected on its PLRMBS to the amortized cost basis of the securities to determine whether a credit loss exists. For the Bank’s variable rate and hybrid PLRMBS, the Bank uses the effective interest rate derived from a variable rate index (for example, the one-month London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR)) plus the contractual spread, plus or minus a fixed spread adjustment when there is an existing discount or premium on the security. As the implied forward rates of the index change over time, the effective interest rates derived from that index will also change over time. The Bank then uses the effective interest rate for the security prior to impairment for determining the present value of the future estimated cash flows.

For all the PLRMBS in its AFS and HTM portfolios, the Bank does not intend to sell any security and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell any security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis.

For securities determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 20142017 (securities for which the Bank determined that it does not expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis), the following table presents a summary of the significant inputs used in measuring the amount of credit loss recognized in earnings during the year ended December 31, 20142017, and the related current credit enhancement for the Bank.

December 31, 2014       
 Significant Inputs for Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS Current
 Prepayment Rates Default Rates Loss Severities Credit Enhancement
Year of SecuritizationWeighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average % Weighted Average %
Prime       
200712.7 4.6 30.9 19.2
200618.0 11.0 36.5 2.9
Total Prime12.8 4.8 31.0 18.8
Alt-A, option ARM       
20057.8 34.3 43.7 2.0
Total Alt-A, option ARM7.8 34.3 43.7 2.0
Alt-A, other       
200714.9 25.4 37.1 7.6
200513.6 17.3 39.7 12.2
2004 and earlier15.9 8.6 31.1 13.6
Total Alt-A, other14.9 19.4 36.1 10.1
Total14.6 19.4 36.2 10.1

135

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
December 31, 2017       
 Significant Inputs for Other-Than-Temporarily Impaired PLRMBS Current
 Prepayment Rates Default Rates Loss Severities Credit Enhancement
Year of Securitization
Weighted Average % (1)
 
Weighted Average % (1)
 
Weighted Average % (1)
 
Weighted Average % (1)
Alt-A, other       
200710.4 29.5 39.4 0.7
200610.8 20.2 39.2 25.0
200513.5 17.8 34.6 2.9
2004 and earlier14.0 1.7 31.4 9.3
Total Alt-A, other11.5 23.4 37.8 7.5
Total11.5 23.4 37.8 7.5


(1) Weighted average percentage is based on unpaid principal balance.


Credit enhancement is defined as the percentage of subordinated tranches, excess spread, and over-collateralization, if any, in a security structure that will generally absorb losses before the Bank will experience a loss on the security. The calculated averages represent the dollar-weighted averages of all the PLRMBS investments in each category shown. The classification (Prime; Alt-A, option ARM; and Alt-A, other) is based on the model used to run the estimated cash flows for the CUSIP, which may not necessarily be the same as the classification at the time of origination.

The following table presents the credit-related OTTI, which is recognized in earnings, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012.2015.

133


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$1,378
 $1,397
 $1,362
$1,183
 $1,255
 $1,314
Additional charges on securities for which OTTI was previously recognized(1)
4
 7
 44
16
 16
 15
Accretion of yield adjustments resulting from improvement of expected cash flows that are recognized over the remaining life of the securities(68) (26) (9)
Securities matured during the period(2)
(1) (7) 
Accretion of yield adjustments resulting from improvement of expected cash flows that are recognized over the remaining life of the securities(3)
(69) (81) (74)
Balance, end of the period$1,314
 $1,378
 $1,397
$1,129
 $1,183
 $1,255

(1)
For the yearyears ended December 31, 20142017, 2016, and 2015, “securities for which OTTI was previously recognized” represents all securities that were also other-than-temporarily impaired prior to January 1, 2014. For2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.
(2)Represents reductions related to securities having reached final maturity during the yearperiod, which therefore are no longer held by the Bank at the end of the period.
(3)
The total net accretion/(amortization) associated with other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS (amount recognized in interest income) totaled $93, $101, and $82 for the years ended December 31, 20132017, “securities for which OTTI was previously recognized” represents all securities that were also other-than-temporarily impaired prior to January 1, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2012, “securities for which OTTI was previously recognized” represents all securities that were also other-than-temporarily impaired prior to January 1, 2012.2016, and 2015, respectively.

Changes in circumstances may cause the Bank to change its intent to hold a certain security to maturity without calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity in the future. The sale or transfer of an HTM security because of certain changes in circumstances, such as evidence of significant deterioration in the issuers’ creditworthiness, is not considered to be inconsistent with its original classification. In addition, other events that are isolated, nonrecurring, or unusual for the Bank that could not have been reasonably anticipated may cause the Bank to sell or transfer an HTM security without necessarily calling into question its intent to hold other debt securities to maturity.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2011, theThe Bank elected to transfer any PLRMBS that incurred a credit-related OTTI charge during the applicable period from the Bank’s HTMheld-to-maturity portfolio to its AFSavailable-for-sale portfolio at their fair values. The Bank recognized an OTTI credit loss on these HTMheld-to-maturity PLRMBS, which the Bank believes is evidence of a significant decline in the issuers’ creditworthiness. The decline in the issuers’ creditworthiness is the basis for the transfers to the AFSavailable-for-sale portfolio. These transfers allow the Bank the option to sell these securities prior to maturity in view of changes in interest rates, changes in prepayment risk, or other factors, while recognizing the Bank’s intent to hold these securities for an indefinite period of time. The Bank does not intend to sell its other-than-temporarily impaired securities and it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell any security before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis.

The Bank did not transfer any PLRMBS from its HTM portfolio to its AFS portfolio during the yearyears ended December 31, 20142017. The following table summarizes the PLRMBS transferred from the Bank’s HTM portfolio to its AFS portfolio during the year ended December 31, 2013. The amounts shown represent the values when the securities were transferred from the HTM portfolio to the AFS portfolio. and 2016.


136

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2013
 Amortized
Cost

 OTTI
Recognized
in AOCI

 Gross
Unrecognized
Holding
Gains

 Estimated
Fair Value

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:       
Alt-A, option ARM$22
 $(3) $
 $19
Alt-A, other54
 (1) 
 53
Total$76
 $(4) $
 $72

The following tables present the Bank’s AFS and HTM PLRMBS that incurred OTTI losses anytime during the life of the securities at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, by loan collateral type:

December 31, 2014             
December 31, 2017             
Available-for-Sale Securities Held-to-Maturity SecuritiesAvailable-for-Sale Securities Held-to-Maturity Securities
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:                          
Prime$682
 $565
 $592
 $
 $
 $
 $
$405
 $335
 $364
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alt-A, option ARM1,391
 1,031
 1,065
 
 
 
 
953
 714
 834
 
 
 
 
Alt-A, other5,374
 4,687
 4,714
 132
 128
 108
 127
2,927
 2,447
 2,635
 64
 59
 53
 63
Total$7,447
 $6,283
 $6,371
 $132
 $128
 $108
 $127
$4,285
 $3,496
 $3,833
 $64
 $59
 $53
 $63
             
December 31, 2013             
Available-for-Sale Securities Held-to-Maturity Securities
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:             
Prime$795
 $661
 $677
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alt-A, option ARM1,516
 1,122
 1,099
 
 
 
 
Alt-A, other6,151
 5,376
 5,271
 150
 147
 120
 144
Total$8,462
 $7,159
 $7,047
 $150
 $147
 $120
 $144


134


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2016             
 Available-for-Sale Securities Held-to-Maturity Securities
 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Estimated
Fair Value

 
Unpaid
Principal
Balance

 
Amortized
Cost

 
Carrying
Value

 
Estimated
Fair Value

Other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS backed by loans classified at origination as:             
Prime$498
 $413
 $434
 $
 $
 $
 $
Alt-A, option ARM1,134
 853
 897
 
 
 
 
Alt-A, other3,650
 3,087
 3,158
 93
 88
 79
 91
Total$5,282
 $4,353
 $4,489
 $93
 $88
 $79
 $91

For the Bank’s PLRMBS that were not other-than-temporarily impaired as of December 31, 20142017, the Bank has experienced net unrealized losses primarily because of illiquidity in the PLRMBS market uncertainty about the future condition of the housing and mortgage markets and the economy, and market expectations of the credit performance of loan collateral underlying these securities, which caused these assets to be valued at discounts to their acquisitionamortized cost. The Bank does not intend to sell these securities, it is not more likely than not that the Bank will be required to sell these securities before its anticipated recovery of the remaining amortized cost basis, and the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, all of the gross unrealized losses on these PLRMBS are temporary. These securities were included in the securities that the Bank reviewed and analyzed for OTTI as discussed above, and the analyses performed indicated that these securities were not other-than-temporarily impaired.

All Other Available-for-Sale and Held-to-Maturity Investments. For the Bank’s investments in housing finance agency bonds, which were issued by CalHFA, the gross unrealized losses were mainly due to an illiquid market,

137

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



credit concerns regarding the underlying mortgage collateral, and credit concerns regarding the monoline insurance providers, causing these investments to be valued at a discount to their acquisition cost. The Bank independently modeled cash flows for the underlying collateral, using assumptions for default rates and loss severity that a market participant would deem reasonable, and concluded that the available credit support within the CalHFA structure more than offset the projected underlying collateral losses. The Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, all of the gross unrealized losses on the bonds are temporary because the underlying collateral and credit enhancements were sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a result, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities.

For its agency MBS, the Bank expects to recover the entire amortized cost basis of these securities because the Bank determined that the strength of the issuers’ guarantees through direct obligations or support from the U.S. government is sufficient to protect the Bank from losses. As a result, the Bank determined that, as of December 31, 20142017, all of the gross unrealized losses on its agency MBS are temporary.

Note 8 — Advances

The Bank offers a wide range of fixed and adjustable rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics, and option features. Fixed rate advances generally have maturities ranging from one day to 30 years. Adjustable rate advances generally have maturities ranging from less than 30 days to 10 years, with the interest rates resetting periodically at a fixed spread to LIBOR or to another specified index.

Redemption Terms. The Bank had advances outstanding, excluding overdrawn demand deposit accounts, at interest rates ranging from 0.14%0.79% to 8.57% at December 31, 20142017, and 0.06%0.43% to 8.57% at December 31, 20132016, as summarized below.

135


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



2014 20132017 2016
Contractual Maturity
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Within 1 year$21,328
 0.63% $22,556
 0.50%$46,403
 1.46% $22,902
 0.78%
After 1 year through 2 years7,597
 1.07
 6,838
 1.48
16,287
 1.61
 7,608
 1.36
After 2 years through 3 years3,235
 1.39
 6,754
 1.24
5,423
 1.73
 9,410
 1.22
After 3 years through 4 years3,216
 1.65
 3,208
 1.43
6,719
 1.69
 2,083
 1.39
After 4 years through 5 years1,655
 1.82
 2,825
 1.79
1,741
 2.10
 6,423
 1.24
After 5 years1,799
 2.81
 2,006
 2.41
913
 3.13
 1,431
 2.60
Total par value38,830
 1.02% 44,187
 1.00%77,486
 1.57% 49,857
 1.09%
Valuation adjustments for hedging activities67
   95
  (88)   (22)  
Valuation adjustments under fair value option89
   113
  (16)   10
  
Total$38,986
   $44,395
  $77,382
   $49,845
  

Many of the Bank’s advances are prepayable at the borrower’s option. However, when advances are prepaid, the borrower is generally charged a prepayment fee intended to make the Bank financially indifferent to the prepayment. In addition, for certain advances with partial prepayment symmetry, the Bank may charge the borrower a prepayment fee or pay the borrower a prepayment credit depending on certain circumstances, such as movements in interest rates, when the advance is prepaid. The Bank had advances with partial prepayment symmetry outstanding totaling $4,619 at December 31, 2017, and $4,9153,647 at December 31, 2014, and $6,833 at December 31, 20132016. Some advances may be repaid on pertinent call dates without prepayment fees (callable advances). The Bank had callable advances outstanding totaling $32818,373 at December 31, 20142017, and $23515,505 at December 31, 20132016.

The Bank’s advances at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, included $1400 and $182, respectively,$125 of putable advances.advances, respectively. At the Bank’s discretion, the Bank may terminate these advances on predetermined exercise dates and offer

138

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



replacement funding at prevailing market rates, subject to certain conditions. The Bank would typically exercise such termination rights when interest rates increase.increase relative to contractual rates.

The following table summarizes advances at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, by the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or next call date for callable advances and by the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or next put date for putable advances.
 
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Call Date
 
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Put Date
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Call Date
 
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Put Date
2014
 2013
 2014
 2013
2017
 2016
 2017
 2016
Within 1 year$21,460
 $22,609
 $21,468
 $22,696
$52,624
 $25,784
 $46,403
 $22,927
After 1 year through 2 years7,693
 6,843
 7,597
 6,838
12,593
 11,078
 16,287
 7,583
After 2 years through 3 years3,258
 6,850
 3,135
 6,754
7,973
 4,465
 5,423
 9,410
After 3 years through 4 years3,291
 3,208
 3,176
 3,108
1,719
 5,782
 6,719
 2,083
After 4 years through 5 years1,646
 2,901
 1,655
 2,785
1,729
 1,421
 1,741
 6,423
After 5 years1,482
 1,776
 1,799
 2,006
848
 1,327
 913
 1,431
Total par value$38,830
 $44,187
 $38,830
 $44,187
$77,486
 $49,857
 $77,486
 $49,857

Credit and Concentration Risk. The following tables present the concentration in advances to the top five borrowers and their affiliates at December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016. The tables also present the interest income from
these advances before the impact of interest rate exchange agreements associated with these advances for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.
December 31, 2014   
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Bank of the West$5,484
 14% $29
 7%
First Republic Bank5,275
 13
 86
 20
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:       
JPMorgan Bank & Trust Company, National Association3,000
 8
 54
 13
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
819
 2
 7
 2
Subtotal JPMorgan Chase & Co.3,819
 10
 61
 15
Bank of America California, N.A.3,500
 9
 18
 4
OneWest Bank, N.A.3,364
 9
 28
 6
     Subtotal21,442
 55
 222
 52
Others17,388
 45
 209
 48
Total par value$38,830
 100% $431
 100%
2016.


139136


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




December 31, 2017
December 31, 2013     
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Advances
Outstanding

 Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances
(1)

 Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

Bank of America California, N.A.$7,750
 18% $15
 3%
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:       
JPMorgan Bank & Trust Company, National Association5,125
 11
 76
 16
Charles Schwab Bank$15,000
 19% $40
 5%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
835
 2
 8
 2
11,363
 15
 174
 19
Subtotal JPMorgan Chase & Co.5,960
 13
 84
 18
First Republic Bank5,150
 12
 70
 15
8,400
 11
 112
 12
MUFG Union Bank, National Association7,250
 9
 48
 5
Bank of the West4,933
 11
 30
 6
6,409
 8
 87
 10
OneWest Bank, FSB4,501
 10
 41
 9
Subtotal28,294
 64
 240
 51
48,422
 62
 461
 51
Others15,893
 36
 234
 49
29,064
 38
 438
 49
Total par value$44,187
 100% $474
 100%$77,486
 100% $899
 100%

December 31, 2016
Name of Borrower
Advances
Outstanding

 
Percentage of
Total
Advances
Outstanding

 
Interest
Income from
Advances(1)

 
Percentage of
Total Interest
Income from
Advances

JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(2)
$14,807
 30% $119
 23%
Bank of the West7,305
 14
 49
 9
First Republic Bank5,900
 12
 70
 13
CIT Bank, N.A.2,411
 5
 28
 5
Star One Credit Union2,024
 4
 27
 5
     Subtotal32,447
 65
 293
 55
Others17,410
 35
 240
 45
Total par value$49,857
 100% $533
 100%

(1)Interest income amounts exclude the interest effect of interest rate exchange agreements with derivative counterparties; as a result, the total interest income amounts will not agree to the Statements of Income. The amount of interest income from advances can vary depending on the amount outstanding, terms to maturity, interest rates, and repricing characteristics.
(2)Nonmember institution.

The Bank held a security interest in collateral from each of the top five advances borrowers and their affiliates sufficient to support their respective advances outstanding, and the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on these advances.

For information related to the Bank’s credit risk on advances and allowance methodology for credit losses, see Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses.

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for advances at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, are detailed below:

137


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)


  
2014
 2013
Par value of advances:   
Fixed rate:   
Due within 1 year$15,422
 $17,998
Due after 1 year12,330
 16,453
Total fixed rate27,752
 34,451
Adjustable rate:   
Due within 1 year5,906
 4,558
Due after 1 year5,172
 5,178
Total adjustable rate11,078
 9,736
Total par value$38,830
 $44,187

  
2017
 2016
Par value of advances:   
Fixed rate:   
Due within 1 year$31,767
 $13,486
Due after 1 year13,022
 10,845
Total fixed rate44,789
 24,331
Adjustable rate:   
Due within 1 year14,636
 9,416
Due after 1 year18,061
 16,110
Total adjustable rate32,697
 25,526
Total par value$77,486
 $49,857

The Bank may use derivatives to adjust the repricing and options characteristics of advances to more closely match the characteristics of the Bank’s funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed or variable rate advance with embedded options, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the advance. The combination of the advance and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates a variable rate asset. This type of hedge relationship receives fair value option accounting treatment. In addition, for certain advances for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the

140

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



terms of the advance. However, this type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge because these combinations generally do not meet the requirements for fair value hedge accounting treatment. For more information, see Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 19 – Fair Value.

The Bank did not have any advances with embedded features that met the requirements to separate the embedded feature from the host contract and designate the embedded feature as a stand-alone derivative at December 31, 20142017 andor 20132016. The Bank has generally elected to account for certain advances with embedded features under the fair value option, and these advances are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. For more information, see Note 19 – Fair Value.

Prepayment Fees, Net. The Bank charges borrowers prepayment fees or pays borrowers prepayment credits when the principal on certain advances is paid prior to original maturity. The Bank records prepayment fees net of any associated fair value adjustments related to prepaid advances that were hedged. The net amount of prepayment fees is reflected as interest income in the Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, as follows:

2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Prepayment fees received$16
 $14
 $211
$1
 $6
 $28
Fair value adjustments(10) (9) (146)
 (1) (20)
Net$6
 $5
 $65
$1
 $5
 $8
Advance principal prepaid$1,650
 $365
 $9,858
$8,469
 $3,459
 $2,229

Note 9 — Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio

Under the MPFMPF® Program, the Bank may purchase from members, for its own portfolio, conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans under the MPF Original product and FHA/VA-insured mortgage loans from members forinsured by the Bank’s own portfolioFHA or guaranteed by the Department of VA under the Original MPF and MPF Government products.product. In addition, the Bank may facilitate the purchase of conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from members for concurrent sale to Fannie Mae under the MPF Xtra® product; of jumbo fixed rate mortgage loans for concurrent sale to Redwood Residential Acquisition Corporation, a subsidiary of Redwood Trust, Inc., a real estate investment trust, under the MPF Direct product; and of government-insured or government-guaranteed mortgage loans that will be packaged into securities backed by the mortgage

138


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



loans and guaranteed by Ginnie Mae under the MPF Government MBS product. When members sell mortgage loans under the MPF Xtra, product.MPF Direct, and MPF Government MBS products, the loans are sold to a third-party investor and are not recorded on the Bank’s Statements of Condition. As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank had approved four23 members as participating financial institutions since renewing its participation in the MPF Program in the fourth quarter of 2013.

From May 2002 through October 2006, the Bank purchased conventional conforming fixed rate mortgage loans from its participating financial institutions under the MPF Original MPF and MPF Plus products. Participating members originated or purchased the mortgage loans, credit-enhanced them and sold them to the Bank, and generally retained the servicing of the loans.

The following table presents information as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, on mortgage loans, all of which are secured by one- to four-unit residential properties and single-unit second homes.

2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Fixed rate medium-term mortgage loans$160
 $238
$32
 $55
Fixed rate long-term mortgage loans553
 675
1,973
 759
Subtotal713
 913
2,005
 814
Unamortized premiums6
 10
76
 18
Unamortized discounts(10) (16)(5) (6)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio709
 907
2,076
 826
Less: Allowance for credit losses(1) (2)
 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$708
 $905
$2,076
 $826

Medium-term loans have original contractual terms of 15 years or less, and long-term loans have contractual terms of more than 15 years.


141

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The participating financial institution and the Bank share the risk of credit losses on conventional MPF loan products by structuring potential losses on conventional MPF loans into layers with respect to each master commitment. After any primary mortgage insurance, the Bank is obligated to incur the first layer or portion of credit losses not absorbed by the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan. Under the MPF Program, the participating financial institution’s credit enhancement protection consists of the credit enhancement amount, which may be a direct obligation of the participating financial institution or may be a supplemental mortgage insurance policy paid for by the participating financial institution, and may include a contingent performance-based credit enhancement fee payable to the participating financial institution. The participating financial institution is required to pledge collateral to secure any portion of its credit enhancement amount that is a direct obligation.

For taking on the credit enhancement obligation, the Bank pays the participating financial institution or any successor a credit enhancement fee, typically 10 basis points per annum, which is calculated on the remaining unpaid principal balance of the mortgage loans. A participating financial institution may elect to receive the credit enhancement fees monthly over the life of the loans or as an upfront lump sum amount that is included in the purchase price at the time loans are sold to the Bank. The lump sum amount is approximately equivalent to the present value of the monthly credit enhancement fees that the Bank would otherwise be expected to pay over the life of the loans. The Bank records credit enhancement fees as a reduction to interest income. The Bank reduced net interest income for credit enhancement fees totaling $1 million in 2014, $12017 and de minimis amounts in 2013,2016 and $1 in 2012.2015.

For information related to the Bank’s credit risk on mortgage loans and allowance methodology for credit losses, see Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses.




139


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 10 — Allowance for Credit Losses

An allowance for credit losses is a valuation allowance separately established for each identified portfolio segment, if it is probable that impairment has occurred in the Bank's portfolio as of the Statements of Condition date and the amount of loss can be reasonably estimated. To the extent necessary, an allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures is recorded as a liability.

Portfolio Segments. A portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic method for determining its allowance for credit losses. The Bank has developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses for each of the following portfolio segments:
advances, letters of credit, and other extensions of credit, collectively referred to as “credit products,”
MPF loans held for portfolio,
term securities purchased under agreements to resell, and
term Federal funds sold.

Classes of Financing Receivables. Classes of financing receivables generally are a disaggregation of a portfolio segment to the extent needed to understand the exposure to credit risk arising from these financing receivables. The Bank determined that no further disaggregation of the portfolio segments identified above is needed because the credit risk arising from these financing receivables is assessed and measured by the Bank at the portfolio segment level.

Credit Products. The Bank lends to member financial institutions that have a principal place of business in Arizona, California, or Nevada. Under the FHLBank Act, the Bank is required to obtain sufficient collateral for credit products to protect the Bank from credit losses. Collateral eligible to secure credit products includes certain investment securities, residential mortgage loans, cash or deposits with the Bank, and other eligible real estate-related assets. The capital stock of the Bank owned by each borrowing member is pledged as additional collateral for the member's indebtedness to the Bank. The Bank may also accept secured small business, small farm, and small agribusiness loans, and securities representing a whole interest in such secured loans, as collateral from members that are community financial institutions. The Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) added secured loans for community development activities as collateral that the Bank may accept from community financial institutions. In addition, the Bank has advances outstanding to former members and member successors, which are also subject to these security terms.


142

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank requires each borrowing member to execute a written Advances and Security Agreement, which describes the lending relationship between the Bank and the borrower. At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Bank had a perfected security interest in collateral pledged by each borrowing member, or by the member's affiliate on behalf of the member, and by each nonmember borrower, with an estimated value in excess of the outstanding credit products for that borrower. Based on the financial condition of the borrower, the Bank may either (i) allow the borrower or the pledging affiliate to retain physical possession of loan collateral pledged to the Bank, provided that the borrower or the pledging affiliate agrees to hold the collateral for the benefit of the Bank, or (ii) require the borrower or the pledging affiliate to deliver physical possession of loan collateral to the Bank or its custodial agent. All securities collateral is required to be delivered to the Bank's custodial agent. All loan collateral pledged to the Bank is subject to a UCC-1 financing statement.

Section 10(e) of the FHLBank Act affords any security interest granted to the Bank by a member or any affiliate of the member or any nonmember borrower priority over claims or rights of any other party, except claims or rights that (i) would be entitled to priority under otherwise applicable law and (ii) are held by bona fide purchasers for value or secured parties with perfected security interests.

The Bank classifies as impaired any advance with respect to which it is probable that all principal and interest due will not be collected according to its contractual terms. Impaired advances are valued using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the advance's effective interest rate, the advance's observable market price

140


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



or, if collateral-dependent, the fair value of the advance's underlying collateral. When an advance is classified as impaired, the accrual of interest is discontinued and unpaid accrued interest is reversed. Advances do not return to accrual status until they are brought current with respect to both principal and interest and until the future principal payments are no longer in doubt. No advances were classified as impaired during the periods presented.

The Bank manages its credit exposure related to credit products through an integrated approach that generally provides for a credit limit to be established for each borrower, includes an ongoing review of each borrower’s financial condition, and is coupled with conservative collateral and lending policies to limit the risk of loss while taking into account borrowers’ needs for a reliable funding source. At December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, none of the Bank’s credit products were past due, on nonaccrual status, or considered impaired. There were no troubled debt restructurings related to credit products during 2014December 31, 2017 and 2013.2016.

Based on the collateral pledged as security for advances, the Bank’s credit analyses of borrowers’ financial condition, and the Bank’s credit extension and collateral policies as of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank expects to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms. Therefore, no allowance for losses on credit products was deemed necessary by the Bank. The Bank has never experienced any credit losses on its credit products.

During 2014, noNo member institutions were placed into receivership.

Fromreceivership during 2017 or from January 1, 2015,2018 to February 28, 2015, no member institutions were placed into receivership.2018.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. A mortgage loan is considered to be impaired when it is reported 90 days or more past due (nonaccrual) or when it is probable, based on current information and events, that the Bank will be unable to collect all principal and interest amounts due according to the contractual terms of the mortgage loan agreement.

Loans that are on nonaccrual status and that are considered collateral-dependent are measured for impairment based on the fair value of the underlying property less estimated selling costs. Loans are considered collateral-dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property, that is, if it is considered likely that the borrower will default and there is no credit enhancement to offset losses under the master commitment, or the collectability or availability of credit enhancement is deemed to be uncertain. Collateral-dependent loans are impaired if the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated selling costs is insufficient

143

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



to recover the unpaid principal balance on the loan. Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the same manner as interest income on nonaccrual loans, as noted below.
 
The Bank places a mortgage loan on nonaccrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest from the participating financial institution is reported 90 days or more past due or when the loan is in foreclosure. When a mortgage loan is placed on nonaccrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income. The Bank records cash payments received on nonaccrual loans first as interest income and then as a reduction of principal as specified in the contractual agreement, unless the collection of the remaining principal amount due is considered doubtful.
The following table presents information on delinquent mortgage loans as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.


141


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Recorded
Investment(1)

 
Recorded
Investment(1)

Recorded
Investment(1)

 
Recorded
Investment(1)

30 – 59 days delinquent$12
 $14
$8
 $7
60 – 89 days delinquent5
 7
2
 3
90 days or more delinquent22
 27
12
 15
Total past due39
 48
22
 25
Total current loans673
 863
2,065
 805
Total mortgage loans$712
 $911
$2,087
 $830
In process of foreclosure, included above(2)
$11
 $17
$3
 $5
Nonaccrual loans$22
 $27
$12
 $15
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$
 $
$
 $
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(3)
3.12% 3.00%0.59% 1.79%

(1)The recorded investment in a loan is the unpaid principal balance of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net deferred loan fees or costs, unamortized premiums or discounts, and direct write-downs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.
(2)Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(3)
Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure as a percentage of the recorded investment of total mortgage loans outstanding.The ratio increased primarily because of the decline in the recorded investment of the Bank’s mortgage loans.

Mortgage Loans Evaluated at the Individual Master Commitment Level– The credit risk analysis of all conventional MPF loans is performed at the individual master commitment level to determine the credit enhancements available to recover losses on MPF loans under each individual master commitment.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans – Certain conventional mortgage loans, primarily impaired mortgage loans that are considered collateral-dependent, may be specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for credit losses. The estimated credit losses on impaired collateral-dependent loans may be separately determined because sufficient information exists to make a reasonable estimate of the inherent loss on those loans on an individual loan basis. The Bank estimates the fair value of collateral using real estate broker price opinions or automated valuation models (AVMs) based on property characteristics as well as recent market sales and current listings. The resulting incurred loss, if any, is equal to the difference between the carrying value of the loan and the estimated fair value of the collateral less estimated selling costs.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans – The credit risk analysis of conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment considers loan pool-specific attribute data, applies estimated loss severities, and considers the associated credit enhancements to determine the Bank's best estimate of probable incurred losses. The analysis includes estimating projected cash flows that the Bank is likely to collect based on an assessment of all available information, including prepayment speeds, default rates, and loss severity for the mortgage loans based on underlying loan-level borrower and loan characteristics; expected housing price changes; and interest rate

144

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



assumptions. In performing a detailed cash flow analysis, the Bank develops its best estimate of the cash flows expected to be collected using a third-party model to project prepayments, default rates, and loss severities based on borrower characteristics and the particular attributes of the mortgage loans, in conjunction with assumptions related primarily to future changes in housing prices and interest rates. The assumptions used as inputs to the model, including the forecast of future housing price changes, are consistent with assumptions used for the Bank's evaluation of its PLRMBS for OTTI.

The amounts of charge-offs and recoveries of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio was as follows:were de minimis during the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. Net charge-offs of allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio were $2 during the year ended December 31, 2015.



142


 2014
 2013
 2012
Balance, beginning of the period$2
 $3
 $6
(Charge-offs) /recoveries(1) 
 (2)
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses
 (1) (1)
Balance, end of the period$1
 $2
 $3
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period(0.05)% (0.07)% (0.08)%
Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The allowance for credit losses and recorded investment by impairment methodology for individually and collectively evaluated impaired loans are as follows:

2014
 2013
Allowance for credit losses, end of period:   
(In millions)2017
 2016
Allowance for credit losses, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$1
 $2
$
 $
Collectively evaluated for impairment
 

 
Total allowance for credit losses$1

$2
$
 $
Recorded investment, end of period:   
Recorded investment, end of the period:   
Individually evaluated for impairment$20
 $27
$9
 $12
Collectively evaluated for impairment692
 884
2,078
 818
Total recorded investment$712
 $911
$2,087
 $830

The recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, are as follows:

2014 20132017 2016
Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
 Recorded Investment
 Unpaid Principal Balance
 Related Allowance
With no related allowance$14
 $14
 $
 $20
 $20
 $
$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $
With an allowance6
 6
 1
 7
 7
 2

 
 
 
 
 
Total$20
 $20
 $1
 $27
 $27
 $2
$9
 $9
 $
 $12
 $12
 $

The average recorded investment on impaired loans individually evaluated for impairment is as follows:

2014
 2013
2017
 2016
With no related allowance$17
 $19
$10
 $12
With an allowance7
 11

 
Total$24
 $30
$10
 $12


145

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank and any participating financial institution share in the credit risk of the loans sold by that institution as specified in a master agreement. Loans purchased under the MPF Program generally havehad a credit risk exposure at the time of purchase that, as determined by the MPF Program methodology, would be expected from an equivalent to assetsinvestment rated AA if purchased prior to April 2017, or rated BBB if purchased since April 2017, taking into consideration the credit risk sharing structure mandated by the Finance Agency’s acquired member assets (AMA) regulation. The MPF Program structures potential credit losses on conventional MPF loans into layers with respect to each pool of loans purchased by the Bank under a single master commitment, as follows:

1.The first layer of protection against loss is the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan.
2.
The next layer of protection comes from the primary mortgage insurance that is required for loans with a loan-to-value ratio greater than 80%, if still in place.
3.Losses that exceed the liquidation value of the real property and any primary mortgage insurance, up to an agreed-upon amount called the first loss account for each master commitment, are incurred by the Bank.
4.Losses in excess of the first loss account for each master commitment, up to an agreed-upon amount called the credit enhancement amount, are covered by the participating financial institution’s credit enhancement obligation at the time losses are incurred.
5.Losses in excess of the first loss account and the participating financial institution’s remaining credit enhancement for the master commitment, if any, are incurred by the Bank.

The Bank calculates its estimated allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans acquired under the MPF Original MPF and MPF Plus products as described below. Effective January 1, 2015, the Bank implemented the accounting

143


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



requirements of regulatory Advisory Bulletin 2012-02. As a result, for any mortgage loans that are more than 180 days past due and that have any outstanding balance in excess of the fair value of the property, less cost to sell, this excess is charged off as a loss by the end of the month in which the applicable time period elapses. Likewise, when a borrower is in bankruptcy, loans are written down to the fair value of the collateral, less cost to sell, in general within 60 days of receipt of the notification of filing from the bankruptcy court, unless it can be clearly demonstrated and documented that repayment is likely to occur. As a result of these charge-offs, corresponding Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans, which had previously provided for most of these expected losses, was reduced accordingly.

Allowance for Credit Losses on MPF Loans The Bank evaluates the allowance for credit losses on MPF mortgage loans based on two components. The first component applies to each individual loan that is specifically identified as impaired. The Bank evaluates the exposure on these loans by considering the first layer of loss protection (the liquidation value of the real property securing the loan) and the availability and collectability of credit enhancements under the terms of each master commitment and records a provision for credit losses. For this component, the Bank established ana de minimis allowance for credit losses for MPF Original MPF loans totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 2014and2013, and for MPF Plus loans totaling $1as of December 31, 2014,2017 and $2 as of December 31, 2013.2016.

The second component applies to loans that are not specifically identified as impaired and is based on the Bank’s estimate of probable credit losses on those loans as of the financial statement date. The Bank evaluates the credit loss exposure on a loan pool basis considering various observable data, such as delinquency statistics, past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral valuations, industry data, and prevailing economic conditions. The Bank also considers the availability and collectability of credit enhancements from participating financial institutions or from mortgage insurers under the terms of each master commitment. For this component, the Bank established an allowance for credit losses for MPF Original MPF loans totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and for MPF Plus loans totaling de minimis amounts as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Troubled Debt Restructurings Troubled debt restructuring (TDR) is considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to the debtor for economic or legal reasons related to the debtor’s financial difficulties and that concession would not have been considered otherwise. An MPF loan considered a TDR is individually evaluated for impairment when determining its related allowance for credit losses. Credit loss is measured by factoring in expected cash flow shortfalls incurred as of the reporting date as well as the economic loss attributable to delaying the original contractual principal and interest due dates, if applicable.

The Bank’s TDRs of MPF loans primarily involve modifying the borrower’s monthly payment for a period of up to 36 months to reflect a housing expense ratio that is no more than 31% of the borrower’s qualifying monthly income. The outstanding principal balance is re-amortized to reflect a principal and interest payment for a term not to exceed 40 years from the original note date and a housing expense ratio not to exceed 31%. This would result in a balloon payment at the original maturity date of the loan because the maturity date and number of remaining monthly

146

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



payments are not adjusted. If the 31% ratio is still not achieved through re-amortization, the interest rate is reduced in 0.125% increments below the original note rate, to a floor rate of 3.00%, resulting in reduced principal and interest payments, for the temporary payment modification period of up to 36 months, until the 31% housing expense ratio is met. 

The recorded investment of the Bank's nonperforming MPF loans classified as TDRs totaled $2.3$3 as of December 31, 2014,2017, and $0.8$3 as of December 31, 2013.2016. During2014 2017 and 2013,2016, the difference between the pre- and post-modification recorded investment in TDRs that occurred during the year was de minimis. None of the MPF loans classified as TDRs within the previous 12 months experienced a payment default.

Term Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are considered collateralized financing arrangements and effectively represent short-term loans to counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, which are classified as assets in the Statements of Condition. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are held in safekeeping in the name of the Bank by third-party custodians approved by the Bank. In accordance with the terms of these loans, if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash. If an agreement to resell is deemed to be impaired, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the amortized cost of the agreement is charged to earnings. The Bank did not have any term securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 2014 and 2013.

Term Federal Funds Sold. The Bank invests in Federal funds sold with counterparties that are considered by the Bank to be of investment quality, and these investments are evaluated for purposes of an allowance for credit losses only if the investment is not paid when due. All investments in Federal funds sold as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, were repaid or are expected to be repaid according to the contractual terms.

Note 11 — Deposits

The Bank maintains demand deposit accounts that are directly related to the extension of credit to members and offers short-term deposit programs to members and qualifying nonmembers. In addition, a member that services mortgage loans may deposit in the Bank funds collected in connection with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of these funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. The Bank classifies these types of deposits as non-interest-bearing deposits.



144


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Deposits as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, were as follows:

2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Interest-bearing deposits:      
Demand and overnight$159
 $190
$263
 $167
Term
 1
Other
 1
Total interest-bearing deposits159
 192
263
 167
Non-interest-bearing deposits1
 1
18
 2
Total$160
 $193
$281
 $169

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Deposits classified as demand, overnight, and other pay interest based on a daily interest rate. Term deposits pay interest based on a fixed rate determined at the issuance of the deposit. Interest rate payment terms for deposits at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, are detailed in the following table:


147

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 2017 2016
 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Interest-bearing deposit – Adjustable rate$263
 1.10% $167
 0.01%
Non-interest-bearing deposits18
   2
  
Total$281
   $169
  



 2014 2013
 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Interest-bearing deposits:       
Fixed rate$
 % $1
 0.01%
Adjustable rate159
 0.01
 191
 0.01
Total interest-bearing deposits159
 0.01
 192
 0.01
Non-interest-bearing deposits1
 
 1
 
Total$160
 0.01% $193
 0.01%

The aggregate amount of time deposits with a denomination of $0.25 or more was zero at December 31, 2014. The aggregate amount of time deposits with a denomination of $0.25 or more was $1 at December 31, 2013, and these time deposits were scheduled to mature within three months.

Note 12 — Consolidated Obligations

Consolidated obligations, consisting of consolidated obligation bonds and discount notes, are jointly issued by the FHLBanks through the Office of Finance, which serves as the FHLBanks’ agent. As provided by the FHLBank Act or by regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations. For a discussion of the joint and several liability regulation, see Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies. In connection with each issuance of consolidated obligations, each FHLBank specifies the type, term, and amount of debt it requests to have issued on its behalf. The Office of Finance tracks the amount of debt issued on behalf of each FHLBank. In addition, the Bank separately tracks and records as a liability its specific portion of the consolidated obligations issued and is the primary obligor for that portion of the consolidated obligations issued. The Finance Agency and the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury have oversight over the issuance of FHLBank debt through the Office of Finance.

Consolidated obligation bonds aremay be issued primarily to raise short-, intermediate-, and long-term funds for the FHLBanks. The maturity of consolidated obligation bonds generally ranges from 16 months to 15 years, but the maturity is not subject to any statutory or regulatory limits. Consolidated obligation discount notes are primarily used to raise short-term funds. These notes are issued at less than their face amount and redeemed at par value when they mature.

The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $847,175$1,034,260 at December 31, 2014,2017, and $766,837$989,311 at December 31, 2013.2016. Regulations require the FHLBanks to maintain, for the benefit of investors in consolidated obligations, in the aggregate, unpledged qualifying assets in an amount equal to the consolidated obligations outstanding. Qualifying assets are defined as cash; secured advances; assets with an assessment or credit rating at least equivalent to the current assessment or credit rating of the consolidated obligations; obligations, participations, mortgages, or other securities of or issued by the United States or an agency of the United States; and such securities as fiduciary and trust funds may invest in under the laws of the state in which the FHLBank is located. Any assets subject to a lien or pledge for the benefit of holders of any issue of consolidated obligations are treated as if they were free from lien or pledge for the purposes of compliance with these regulations. At December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank had qualifying assets totaling $75,629,$123,177, and the Bank's participation in consolidated obligations outstanding was $68,856.$115,503.


145


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



General Terms. Consolidated obligations are generally issued with either fixed rate payment terms or adjustable rate payment terms, which use a variety of indices for interest rate resets, including LIBOR, the Federal funds effective rate, and others.terms. In addition, to meet the specific needs of certain investors, fixed rate and adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds may contain certain embedded features, such as call options and complex coupon payment terms. In general, when such consolidated obligation bonds are issued for which the Bank is the primary obligor, the Bank simultaneously enters into interest rate exchange agreements containing offsetting features to, in effect, convert the terms of the bond to the terms of a simple adjustable rate bond indexed to LIBOR.bond.

148

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




In addition to having fixed rate or simple adjustable rate coupon payment terms, consolidated obligations may include:
Callable bonds, which the Bank may call in whole or in part at its option on predetermined call dates according to the terms of the bond offerings;
Step-up callable bonds, which pay interest at increasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank's option on the step-up dates according to the terms of the bond offerings;
Step-down callable bonds, which pay interest at decreasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank's option on the step-down dates according to the terms of the bond offerings;
Conversion callable bonds, which have coupon rates that convert from fixed to adjustable or from adjustable to fixed on predetermined dates and can generally be called at the Bank’s option on predetermined call dates according to the terms of the bond offerings.offerings;
Range bonds, which have coupons at fixed or variable rates and pay the fixed or variable rate as long as a reference rate is within an established range, but generally pay zero percent or a minimal interest rate if the specified reference rate is outside the established range.

Redemption Terms. The following is a summary of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

2014 20132017 2016
Contractual Maturity
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Within 1 year$21,044
 0.36% $26,161
 0.40%$69,734
 1.33% $33,879
 0.82%
After 1 year through 2 years9,871
 2.43
 7,101
 0.80
6,461
 1.42
 10,597
 0.99
After 2 years through 3 years4,518
 1.70
 7,740
 2.94
2,785
 1.74
 1,318
 1.32
After 3 years through 4 years2,336
 1.49
 1,963
 2.50
2,058
 1.78
 1,055
 1.84
After 4 years through 5 years3,103
 1.71
 2,420
 1.49
1,994
 2.15
 1,350
 1.59
After 5 years5,851
 2.13
 7,384
 1.99
2,076
 2.80
 2,021
 2.42
Total par value46,723
 1.29% 52,769
 1.17%85,108
 1.41% 50,220
 0.98%
Unamortized premiums58
   78
  9
   15
  
Unamortized discounts(13)   (16)  (11)   (9)  
Valuation adjustments for hedging activities308
   491
  (37)   6
  
Fair value option valuation adjustments(31)   (115)  (6)   (8)  
Total$47,045
   $53,207
  $85,063
   $50,224
  

The Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding includes callable bonds of $9,612 at December 31, 2017, and $14,1584,670 at December 31, 2014, and $13,042 at December 31, 20132016. When a callable bond for which the Bank is the primary obligor is issued, the Bank may simultaneously enter into an interest rate swap (in which the Bank pays a variable rate and receives a fixed rate) with a call feature that mirrors the call option embedded in the bond (a sold callable swap). The Bank had notional amounts of interest rate exchange agreements hedging callable bonds of $9,5736,406 at December 31, 20142017, and $9,9972,125 at December 31, 20132016. The combined sold callable swaps and callable bonds enable

146


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the Bank to meet its funding needs at costs not otherwise directly attainable solely through the issuance of non-callable debt, while effectively converting the Bank’s net payment to an adjustable rate.

The Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, was as follows:
2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Par value of consolidated obligation bonds:      
Non-callable$32,565
 $39,727
$75,496
 $45,550
Callable14,158
 13,042
9,612
 4,670
Total par value$46,723
 $52,769
$85,108
 $50,220

149

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The following is a summary of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation bonds outstanding at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, by the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or next call date.
 
Earlier of Contractual
Maturity or Next Call Date
2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Within 1 year$33,558
 $36,093
$78,606
 $38,099
After 1 year through 2 years9,156
 6,046
5,326
 10,747
After 2 years through 3 years2,043
 7,550
935
 743
After 3 years through 4 years1,010
 1,478
85
 455
After 4 years through 5 years385
 830
55
 85
After 5 years571
 772
101
 91
Total par value$46,723
 $52,769
$85,108
 $50,220

Consolidated obligation discount notes are consolidated obligations issued to raise short-term funds. These notes are issued at less than their face value and redeemed at par value when they mature. The Bank’s participation in consolidated obligation discount notes, at December 31, 2014 and 2013, all of which are due within one year, was as follows:
2014 20132017 2016
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted
Average
Interest Rate

Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate (1)

 
Amount
Outstanding

 
Weighted Average
Interest Rate (1)

Par value$21,815
 0.09% $24,199
 0.10%$30,494
 1.24% $33,529
 0.46%
Unamortized discounts(4)   (5)  (54)   (23)  
Total$21,811
   $24,194
  $30,440
   $33,506
  

(1) Represents yield to maturity excluding concession fees.

Interest Rate Payment Terms. Interest rate payment terms for consolidated obligations at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, are detailed in the following table.

147


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Par value of consolidated obligations:      
Bonds:      
Fixed rate$39,324
 $38,489
$17,967
 $15,960
Adjustable rate3,678
 11,218
66,276
 33,435
Step-up2,654
 2,460
565
 515
Step-down500
 340
200
 200
Fixed rate that converts to adjustable rate467
 262

 10
Range bonds100
 
100
 100
Total bonds, par value46,723
 52,769
85,108
 50,220
Discount notes, par value21,815
 24,199
30,494
 33,529
Total consolidated obligations, par value$68,538
 $76,968
$115,602
 $83,749

Consolidated obligation bonds may be structured to meet the Bank's or the investors' needs. Common structures include fixed rate bonds with or without call options and adjustable rate bonds with or without embedded options. In general, when bonds are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options, if any, of the consolidated obligation bond. This combination of the consolidated obligation bond and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates an adjustable rate bond. The cost of this funding combination is generally lower than the cost that would be available through the issuance of an adjustable rate bond alone. These transactions generally receive fair value hedge accounting

150

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



treatment. In addition, when certain consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank has elected the fair value option are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the terms of the consolidated obligation bond. However, this type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge because these combinations generally do not meet the requirements for fair value hedge accounting treatment. For more information, see Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Note 19 – Fair Value.

The Bank did not have any bonds with embedded features that met the requirements to separate the embedded feature from the host contract and designate the embedded feature as a stand-alone derivative at December 31, 20142017 or 20132016. In general, theThe Bank has generally elected to account for certain bonds with embedded features under the fair value option, and these bonds are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. For more information, see Note 19 – Fair Value.

Note 13 — Affordable Housing Program

The FHLBank Act requires each FHLBank to establish an Affordable Housing Program (AHP). Each FHLBank provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances. Annually, the FHLBanks must set aside for their AHPs, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 or 10% of the current year's net earnings (income before interest expense related to dividends paid on mandatorily redeemable capital stock and the assessment for AHP).

The Bank accrues its AHP assessment monthly based on its net earnings. If the Bank experienced a net loss during a quarter but still had net earnings for the year, the Bank's obligation to the AHP would be calculated based on the Bank's year-to-date net earnings. If the Bank had net earnings in subsequent quarters, it would be required to contribute additional amounts to meet its calculated annual obligation. If the Bank experienced a net loss for a full year, the amount of the AHP liability would be equal to zero, since each FHLBank's required annual AHP contribution is limited to its annual net earnings. However, if the result of the aggregate 10% calculation is less than $100 for the FHLBanks combined, then the FHLBank Act requires that each FHLBank contribute such prorated sums as may be required to ensure that the aggregate contribution of the FHLBanks equals $100. The proration would be made on the basis of an FHLBank's income in relation to the income of all the FHLBanks for the previous

148


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



year. There was no AHP shortfall, as described above, in 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, or 2012.2015. If an FHLBank finds that its required AHP assessments are contributing to the financial instability of that FHLBank, it may apply to the Finance Agency for a temporary suspension of its contributions. The Bank did not make such an application in 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, or 2012.2015.

The Bank's total AHP assessments equaled $36, $52,$45, $86, and $60$78 during 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively. These amounts were charged to earnings each year and recognized as a liability. As subsidies are disbursed, the AHP liability is reduced. The AHP liability was as follows:

2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$151
 $144
 $150
$205
 $172
 $147
AHP assessments36
 52
 60
45
 86
 78
AHP voluntary contributions7
 
 
AHP grant payments(40) (45) (66)(53) (53) (53)
Balance, end of the period$147
 $151
 $144
$204
 $205
 $172

All subsidies were distributed in the form of direct grants in 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012.2015.


149


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 14 — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)

The following table summarizes the changes in AOCI for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 2012:2015:


151

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 Net Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on AFS Securities
 Net Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on HTM Securities
 Pension and Postretirement Benefits
 Total
AOCI

Balance, December 31, 2014$88
 $(20) $(12) 56
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:       
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits    (2) (2)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(18) (1)   (19)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred(1) 1
   
Net change in fair value(29)     (29)
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss  6
   6
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):       
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI3
 
   3
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)(45) 6
 (2) (41)
Balance, December 31, 2015$43
 $(14) $(14) 15
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:       
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits    (2) (2)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(17) 
   (17)
Net change in fair value103
     103
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss  5
   5
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):       
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI7
 
   7
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)93
 5
 (2) 96
Balance, December 31, 2016$136
 $(9) $(16) $111
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:       
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits    3
 3
Non-credit-related OTTI loss(4) 
   (4)
Net change in fair value195
     195
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss  3
   3
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):       
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI10
 
   10
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)201
 3
 3
 207
Balance, December 31, 2017$337
 $(6) $(13) $318



 Net Unrealized Gain/(Loss) on AFS Securities

Net Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on AFS Securities

Net Non-Credit-Related OTTI Loss on HTM Securities

Pension and Postretirement Benefits

Total
AOCI

Balance, December 31, 2011$1
 $(1,836) $(46) $(12) $(1,893)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:         
Non-credit-related OTTI loss  
 (25)   (25)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred  (28) 28
   
Net change in fair value(1) 1,102
     1,101
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss    9
   9
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):         
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI  14
 
   14
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)(1) 1,088
 12
 
 1,099
Balance, December 31, 2012
 (748) (34) (12) (794)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:         
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits      5
 5
Non-credit-related OTTI loss  
 (4)   (4)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss transferred  (4) 4
   
Net change in fair value
 644
     644
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss    7
   7
Reclassification from other comprehensive income/(loss) to net income/(loss):         
Non-credit-related OTTI to credit-related OTTI  (3) 
   (3)
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)
 637
 7
 5
 649
Balance, December 31, 2013
 (111) (27) (7) (145)
Other comprehensive income/(loss) before reclassifications:         
Net change in pension and postretirement benefits      (5) (5)
Non-credit-related OTTI loss  (10) 
   (10)
Net change in fair value
 209
     209
Accretion of non-credit-related OTTI loss    7
   7
Net current period other comprehensive income/(loss)
 199
 7
 (5) 201
Balance, December 31, 2014$
 $88
 $(20) $(12) $56

Note 15 — Capital

Capital Requirements. The Bank issues only one class of capital stock, Class B stock, with a par value of one hundred dollars per share, which may be redeemed (subject to certain conditions) upon five years' notice by the member to the Bank. In addition, at its discretion, under certain conditions, the Bank may repurchase excess capital stock at any time. (See “Excess Capital Stock” below for more information.) The capital stock may be issued, redeemed, and repurchased only at its stated par value, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank may only redeem or repurchase capital stock from a shareholder if, following the redemption or repurchase,

150


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the shareholder will continue to meet its minimum capital stock requirement and the Bank will continue to meet its regulatory requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital.

Under the Housing Act, the Director of the Finance Agency is responsible for setting the risk-based capital standards for the FHLBanks. The FHLBank Act and regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks require that the Bank’s minimum capital stock requirement for shareholders must be sufficient to enable the Bank to meet its regulatory requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital. The Bank must maintain: (i)

152

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



total regulatory capital in an amount equal to at least 4% of its total assets, (ii) leverage capital in an amount equal to at least 5% of its total assets, and (iii) permanent capital in an amount that is greater than or equal to its risk-based capital requirement. Because the Bank issues only Class B stock, regulatory capital and permanent capital for the Bank are both composed of retained earnings and Class B stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock (which is classified as a liability for financial reporting purposes). Regulatory capital and permanent capital do not include AOCI. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of permanent capital, weighted by a 1.5 multiplier, plus non-permanent capital.

The risk-based capital requirement is equal to the sum of the Bank’s credit risk, market risk, and operations risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Finance Agency. The Finance Agency may require an FHLBank to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirement as defined.

As of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, the Bank was in compliance with these capital rules and requirements as shown in the following table.
2014 20132017 2016
Required
 Actual
 Required
 Actual
Required
 Actual
 Required
 Actual
Risk-based capital$3,231
 $6,356
 $3,912
 $7,925
$2,023
 $6,797
 $2,241
 $5,883
Total regulatory capital$3,032
 $6,356
 $3,431
 $7,925
$4,935
 $6,797
 $3,678
 $5,883
Total regulatory capital ratio4.00% 8.38% 4.00% 9.24%4.00% 5.51% 4.00% 6.40%
Leverage capital$3,790
 $9,534
 $4,289
 $11,888
$6,169
 $10,195
 $4,597
 $8,825
Leverage ratio5.00% 12.58% 5.00% 13.86%5.00% 8.26% 5.00% 9.60%

The Bank's capital plan requires each member to own capital stock in an amount equal to the greater of its membership capital stock requirement or its activity-based capital stock requirement. The Bank may adjust these requirements from time to time within limits established in the capital plan. Any changes to the capital plan must be approved by the Bank's Board of Directors and the Finance Agency.

A member's membership capital stock requirement is 1.0% of its membership asset value. The membership capital stock requirement for a member is capped at $25.$15. The Bank may adjust the membership capital stock requirement for all members within a range of 0.5% to 1.5% of a member's membership asset value and may adjust the cap for all members within an authorized range of $10 to $50. A member's membership asset value is determined by multiplying the amount of the member's membership assets by the applicable membership asset factors. Membership assets are generally defined as assets (other than Bank capital stock) of a type that could qualify as collateral to secure a member's indebtedness to the Bank under applicable law, whether or not the assets are pledged to the Bank or accepted by the Bank as eligible collateral. The membership asset factors were initially based on the typical borrowing capacity percentages generally assigned by the Bank to the same types of assets when pledged to the Bank (although the factors may differ from the actual borrowing capacities, if any, assigned to particular assets pledged by a specific member at any point in time).

A member's activity-based capital stock requirement is the sum of 4.7%2.7% of the member's outstanding advances plus 5.0%0.0% of any portion of any mortgage loan purchased and held by the Bank. The Bank may adjust the activity-based capital stock requirement for all members within a range of 4.4%2.0% to 5.0% of the member's outstanding advances and a range of 5.0%0.0% to 5.7%5.0% of any portion of any mortgage loan purchased and held by the Bank.

The Bank amended its capital plan, effective April 1, 2015, to lower the cap on the membership stock requirement to $15 from $25, lower the activity-based stock requirement to 3.0% from 4.7% for outstanding advances and to 3.0% from 5.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank, and change the authorized ranges for the activity-based stock requirement to a range of 2.0% to 5.0% for advances and a range of 0.0% to 5.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank.
151

153

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act (GLB Act) established voluntary membership for all members.
Any member may withdraw from membership and, subject to certain statutory and regulatory restrictions, have its capital stock redeemed after giving the required notice. Members that withdraw from membership may not reapply for membership for five years, in accordance with Finance Agency rules.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The Bank reclassifies the capital stock subject to redemption from capital to a liability after a member provides the Bank with a written notice of redemption; gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; or attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or after a receiver or other liquidating agent for a member transfers the member's Bank capital stock to a nonmember entity, resulting in the member's shares then meeting the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument. Shares meeting this definition are reclassified to a liability at fair value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reflected as interest expense in the Statements of Income. The repayment of these mandatorily redeemable financial instruments (by repurchase or redemption of the shares) is reflected as a financing cash outflow in the Statements of Cash Flows once settled.

The Bank has a cooperative ownership structure under which members, former members, and certain other nonmembers own the Bank's capital stock. Former members and certain other nonmembers are required to maintain their investment in the Bank's capital stock until their outstanding transactions are paid off or until their capital stock is redeemed following the relevant five-year redemption period for capital stock or is repurchased by the Bank, in accordance with the Bank's capital requirements. Capital stock cannot be issued, repurchased, redeemed, or transferred except between the Bank and its members (or their affiliates and successors) at the capital stock's par value of one hundred dollars per share. If a member cancels its written notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal or if the Bank allows the transfer of mandatorily redeemable capital stock to a member, the Bank reclassifies mandatorily redeemable capital stock from a liability to capital. After the reclassification, dividends on the capital stock are no longer classified as interest expense.

The Bank will not redeem or repurchase capital stock required to meet the minimum capital stock requirement until five years after the member's membership is terminated or after the Bank receives notice of the member's withdrawal, and the Bank will redeem or repurchase only the amounts that are in excess of the capital stock required to support activity (advances and mortgage loans) that may remain outstanding after the five-year redemption period has expired. The Bank will not redeem or repurchase activity-based capital stock as long as the activity remains outstanding, even after the expiration of the five-year redemption period. In both cases, the Bank will only redeem or repurchase capital stock if certain statutory and regulatory conditions are met. In accordance with the Bank's current practice, if activity-based capital stock becomes excess capital stock because an activity no longer remains outstanding, the Bank may repurchase the excess activity-based capital stock at its discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory conditions, on a scheduled quarterly basis.

The Bank had mandatorily redeemable capital stock totaling $719309 outstanding to 32seven institutions at December 31, 20142017, and $2,071$457 outstanding to 44six institutions at December 31, 20132016. The change in mandatorily redeemable capital stock for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 20122015, was as follows:
 2017
 2016
 2015
Balance at the beginning of the period$457
 $488
 $719
Reclassified from/(to) capital during the period(1)
2
 56
 415
Redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(75) (28) (53)
Repurchase of excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock(75) (59) (593)
Balance at the end of the period$309
 $457
 $488

(1)The Bank reclassified $403 of capital stock to mandatorily redeemable capital stock (a liability) on September 1, 2015, as a result of the merger of JPMorgan B&T with an into JPMorgan Chase, a nonmember of the Bank.

Cash dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock were recorded as interest expense in the amount of $32, $60, and $65 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively.

 2014
 2013
 2012
Balance at the beginning of the period$2,071
 $4,343
 $5,578
Reclassified from/(to) capital during the period3
 4
 37
Redemption of mandatorily redeemable capital stock(296) (502) (43)
Repurchase of excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock(1,059) (1,774) (1,229)
Balance at the end of the period$719
 $2,071
 $4,343
152


154

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Cash dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock were recorded as interest expense in the amount of $120, $155, and $51 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, respectively.

The following table presents mandatorily redeemable capital stock amounts by contractual redemption period at December 31, 20142017, and 20132016.

Contractual Redemption Period2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Within 1 year$51
 $571
After 1 year through 2 years582
 111
After 2 years through 3 years9
 1,289
$306
 $
After 3 years through 4 years1
 20

 379
After 4 years through 5 years2
 3
Past contractual redemption date because of remaining activity(1)
74
 77
3
 78
Total$719
 $2,071
$309
 $457

(1)Represents mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is past the end of the contractual redemption period because of outstanding activity.

A member may cancel its notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal from membership by providing written notice to the Bank prior to the end of the relevant five-year redemption period or the membership termination date. If the Bank receives the notice of cancellation within 30 months following the notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal, the member is charged a fee equal to fifty cents multiplied by the number of shares of capital stock affected. If the Bank receives the notice of cancellation more than 30 months following the notice of redemption or notice of withdrawal (or if the Bank does not redeem the member's capital stock because following the redemption the member would fail to meet its minimum capital stock requirement), the member is charged a fee equal to one dollar multiplied by the number of shares of capital stock affected. In certain cases the Board of Directors may waive a cancellation fee for bona fide business purposes.

The Bank's capital stock is considered putable by the shareholder. There are significant statutory and regulatory restrictions on the Bank's obligation or ability to redeem outstanding capital stock, which include the following:
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if, following the redemption, the Bank would fail to meet its minimum capital requirements for total capital, leverage capital, and risk-based capital. All of the Bank's capital stock immediately becomes nonredeemable if the Bank fails to meet its minimum capital requirements.
The Bank may not be able to redeem any capital stock if either its Board of Directors or the Finance Agency determines that it has incurred or is likely to incur losses resulting in or expected to result in a charge against capital that would have any of the following effects: cause the Bank not to comply with its regulatory capital requirements, result in negative retained earnings, or otherwise create an unsafe and unsound condition at the Bank.
In addition to being able to prohibit capital stock redemptions, the Bank's Board of Directors has a right to call for additional capital stock purchases by its members, as a condition of continuing membership, as needed for the Bank to satisfy its statutory and regulatory capital requirements.
If, during the period between receipt of a capital stock redemption notice and the actual redemption (a period that could last indefinitely), the Bank becomes insolvent and is either liquidated or merged with another FHLBank, the redemption value of the capital stock will be established either through the liquidation or the merger process. If the Bank is liquidated, after satisfaction of the Bank's obligations to creditors and to the extent funds are then available, each shareholder will be entitled to receive the par value of its capital stock as well as any retained earnings in an amount proportional to the shareholder's share of the total shares of capital stock, subject to any limitations that may be imposed by the Finance Agency. In the event of a merger or consolidation, the Board of Directors will determine the rights and preferences of the Bank's shareholders, subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Finance Agency.

155

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if the principal or interest due on any consolidated obligations issued by the Office of Finance has not been paid in full.
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if the Bank fails to provide the Finance Agency with the quarterly certification required by Finance Agency rules prior to declaring or paying dividends for a quarter.
The Bank may not redeem any capital stock if the Bank is unable to provide the required quarterly certification, projects that it will fail to comply with statutory or regulatory liquidity requirements or will be unable to fully meet all of its obligations on a timely basis, actually fails to satisfy these requirements or

153


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



obligations, or negotiates to enter or enters into an agreement with another FHLBank to obtain financial assistance to meet its current obligations.

Mandatorily redeemable capital stock is considered capital for determining the Bank's compliance with its regulatory capital requirements. Based on Finance Agency interpretation, the classification of certain shares of the Bank's capital stock as mandatorily redeemable does not affect the definition of total capital for purposes of: determining the Bank's compliance with its regulatory capital requirements, calculating its mortgage-backed securities investment authority (300% of total capital), calculating its unsecured credit exposure to other GSEs (limited to 100% of total capital), or calculating its unsecured credit limits to other counterparties (various percentages of total capital depending on the rating of the counterparty).

Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework. By Finance Agency regulation, dividends may be paid only out of current net earnings or previously retained earnings. As required by the Finance Agency, the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework is reviewed at least annually by the Bank's Board of Directors. It(Framework) summarizes the Bank’s capital management principles and objectives, as well as its policies and practices, with respect to retained earnings, dividend payments, and the repurchase of excess capital stock. The Board of Directors may amend the Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework from time to time.

The Bank may be restricted from paying dividends if the Bank is not in compliance with any of its minimum capital requirements or if payment would cause the Bank to fail to meet any of its minimum capital requirements. In addition, the Bank may not pay dividends if any principal or interest due on any consolidated obligations has not been paid in full or is not expected to be paid in full, or, under certain circumstances, if the Bank fails to satisfy certain liquidity requirements under applicable Finance Agency regulations.

The Bank’s Board of Directors reviews the Framework at least annually and may amend the Framework from time to time. In January 2017, the Framework was amended and approved by the Bank’s Board of Directors to include a dividend philosophy to endeavor to pay a quarterly dividend at an annualized rate between 5% and 7%, which was intended to be considered by the Bank’s Board of Directors beginning with the Bank’s second quarter 2017 dividend declaration. The decision to declare any dividend and the dividend rate are at the discretion of the Bank’s Board of Directors, which may choose to follow the dividend philosophy as guidance in the dividend declaration.

The Bank’s Risk Management Policy limits the payment of dividends if the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock falls below certain levels. If this ratio at the end of any quarter is less than 100% but greater than or equal to 70%, any dividend would be limited to an annualized rate no greater than the daily average of the three-month LIBOR for the applicable quarter (subject to certain conditions), and if this ratio is less than 70%, the Bank would be restricted from paying a dividend. The ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of total capital to par value of capital stock was 168%207% as of December 31, 2014.2017.

In addition, the Bank monitors the condition of its PLRMBS portfolio, the ratio of the Bank’s estimated market value of the Bank’stotal capital to the par value of the Bank’s capital stock, its overall financial performance and retained earnings, developments in the mortgage and credit markets, and other relevant information as the basis for determining the payment of dividends and the repurchase of excess capital stock each quarter.

Retained Earnings RelatedThe Bank’s Framework assesses the level and adequacy of retained earnings and establishes amounts to Valuation Adjustments In accordance with the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework, the Bank retainsbe retained in restricted retained earnings, any cumulative net gainswhich are not made available in the current dividend period, and maintains an amount of total retained earnings (netat least equal to its required retained earnings as described in the Framework. Prior to July 2017, the Bank’s Framework had three categories of applicable assessments) resultingrestricted retained earnings: Valuation Adjustments, Other (which represented a targeted amount), and the Joint Capital Enhancement (JCE Agreement). Under the Framework, the Bank’s required amount of restricted retained earnings was determined using the Bank’s retained earnings methodology. As determined using the Bank’s methodology, from gains or losses on derivativesJuly 2015 to January 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,000, and associated hedged items and financial instruments carried at fair value (valuation adjustments).from January 2017 to July 2017, the Bank’s restricted retained earnings requirement was $2,300.

In general, the Bank's derivatives and hedged instruments, as well as certain assets and liabilities that are carried at fair value, are held to the maturity, call, or put date. For these financial instruments, net valuation gains or losses are primarily a matter of timing and will generally reverse through changes in future valuations and settlements of

156154


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



contractual interest cash flows over the remaining contractual terms to maturity, or by the exercised call or put dates. However, the Bank may have instances in which hedging relationships are terminated prior to maturity or prior to the call or put dates. Terminating the hedging relationship may result in a realized gain or loss. In addition, the Bank may have instances in which it may sell trading securities prior to maturity, which may also result in a realized gain or loss.

The purposeIn July 2017, the Bank’s Board of retaining cumulative net gains in earnings resulting from valuation adjustmentsDirectors approved the transfer of all amounts classified as restricted retained earnings, is to provide sufficient retained earnings to offset future net losses that result fromother than the reversal of cumulative net gains, so that potential dividend payouts in future periods are not necessarily affected by the reversals of these gains. Although restricting retained earnings in this way may preserve the Bank's ability to pay dividends, the reversal of the cumulative net gains in any given period may result in a net loss if the reversal exceeds net earnings before the impact of valuation adjustments for that period.

Other Retained Earnings – Targeted Buildup In addition to any cumulative net gains resulting from valuation adjustments, the Bank holds an additional amount in restricted retained earnings intended to protect paid-in capital from the effects of an extremely adverse credit event, an extremely adverse operations risk event, a cumulative net lossamounts related to the Bank's derivatives and associated hedged items and financial instruments carried at fair value, an extremely adverseJCE Agreement, to unrestricted retained earnings. As a conforming change inrelated to the market value oftransfer, the Bank's capital, a significant amount of additional credit-related OTTI on PLRMBS, or some combination of these effects, especially in periods of extremely low net income resulting from an adverse interest rate environment.

TheBank’s Board of Directors has setamended the targeted amountFramework to eliminate two of the categories of restricted retained earnings at $1,800,(Valuation Adjustments and Other) and approved revisions to the Bank reached this target as of March 31, 2012. The Bank'sBank’s retained earnings targetmethodology to provide for a required level of total retained earnings of $2,300 for loss protection, capital compliance, and business growth. In January 2018, the methodology was further revised to provide a required level of total retained earnings of $2,500. The Bank satisfies its retained earnings requirement with both restricted retained earnings (i.e., amounts related to the JCE Agreement) and unrestricted retained earnings.

The Bank’s retained earnings requirement may be changed at any time. The Board of Directors periodically reviews the applicableretained earnings methodology and analysis to determine whether any adjustments are appropriate. As of December 31, 2014, the amount of restricted retained earnings in the Bank's targeted buildup account was $1,800.

Joint Capital EnhancementThe JCE Agreement The FHLBanks’ Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended (JCE Agreement), is intended to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, each FHLBank is required to allocate 20% of its net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of the account equals at least 1% of that FHLBank's average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter. Under the JCE Agreement, these restricted retained earnings will not be available to pay dividends.

The following table summarizestables summarize the activity related to restricted retained earnings for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 20132016:

 2014 2013
 Restricted Retained Earnings Related to: Restricted Retained Earnings Related to:
 Valuation Adjustments
Targeted Buildup
Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement
Total
 Valuation Adjustments
Targeted Buildup
Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement
Total
Balance at the beginning of the period$88
$1,800
$189
$2,077
 $73
$1,800
$128
$2,001
Transfers to/(from) restricted retained earnings(53)
41
(12) 15

61
76
Balance at the end of the period$35
$1,800
$230
$2,065
 $88
$1,800
$189
$2,077
   Restricted Retained Earnings Related to:  
 Unrestricted Retained Earnings
 Valuation Adjustments
 Other
 Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement
 Total Restricted Retained Earnings
 Total Retained Earnings
Balance, December 31, 2015$610
 $10
 $1,650
 $358
 $2,018
 $2,628
Net income562
 8
 
 142
 150
 712
Cash dividends on capital stock(284)       

 (284)
Balance, December 31, 2016$888
 $18
 $1,650
 $500
 $2,168
 $3,056
Net income198
 3
 100
 75
 178
 376
Cash dividends on capital stock(187)       

 (187)
Transfers from restricted retained earnings1,771
 (21) (1,750) 
 (1,771) 
Balance, December 31, 2017$2,670
 $
 $
 $575
 $575
 $3,245

Dividend Payments – Finance Agency rules state that FHLBanks may declare and pay dividends only from previously retained earnings or current net earnings, and may not declare or pay dividends based on projected or anticipated earnings. There is no requirement that the Board of Directors declare and pay any dividend. A decision by the Board of Directors to declare or not declare a dividend is a discretionary matter and is subject to the

157

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



requirements and restrictions of the FHLBank Act and applicable requirements under the regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

The Bank currently pays dividends in cash rather than capital stock to comply withIn addition, Finance Agency rules which do not permit the Bank to pay dividends in the form of capital stock if its excess
capital stock exceeds 1% of its total assets. Excess capital stock is defined as the aggregate of the capital stock held by each shareholder in excess of its minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan. As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank’s excess capital stock totaled $1,118,$493, or 1.47%0.40% of total assets.

TheIn 2017, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 7.02%7.50%, totaling $360,$219, including $240$187 in dividends on capital stock and $120$32 in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock in 2014. Thestock. In 2016, the Bank paid dividends at an annualized rate of 3.99%12.33%, totaling $316,$344, including $161$284 in dividends on capital stock and $155$60 in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The dividends paid in 2016 included four quarterly dividends and a special

155


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



dividend in the amount of $100, including $83 on capital stock and $17 in 2013.dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

For the periods referenced above, the Bank paid dividends in cash. Dividends on capital stock are recognized as dividends on the Statements of Capital Accounts, and dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock are recognized as interest expense on the Statements of Income.

On February 19, 2015,21, 2018, the Bank’s Board of Directors declared a cash dividend on the capital stock outstanding during the fourth quarter of 20142017 at an annualized rate of 7.11%7.00%, totaling $74,$59, including $59$53 in dividends on capital stock and $15$6 in dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock. The Bank recorded the dividend on February 19, 2015, the day it was declared by the Board of Directors.21, 2018. The Bank expects to pay the dividend on or about March 19, 2015.15, 2018. Dividends on mandatorily redeemable capital stock will be recognized as interest expense in the first quarter of 2015.2018.

Excess Capital Stock – The Bank may repurchase some or all of a shareholder’s excess capital stock, including any excess mandatorily redeemable capital stock, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank must give the shareholder 15 days’ written notice; however, the shareholder may waive this notice period. The Bank may also repurchase some or all of a shareholder’smember’s excess capital stock at the shareholder’sa member’s request, at the Bank’s discretion, subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements. A shareholder’s excess capital stock is defined as any capital stock holdings in excess of the shareholder’s minimum capital stock requirement, as established by the Bank’s capital plan.

On a quarterly basis, the Bank determines whether it will repurchase excess capital stock. The Bank repurchased $2,000$414 and $3,000$812 in excess capital stock during 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

The Bank is required to redeem any mandatorily redeemable capital stock that is in excess of a former member’s minimum stock requirement on or after the expiration of the five-year redemption date. During 20142017 and 2013,2016, the Bank redeemed $296$75 and $502,$28, respectively, in mandatorily redeemable capital stock, for which the five-year redemption period had expired, at its $100 par value. The stock was redeemed on the scheduled redemption dates or, for stock that was not excess stock on its scheduled redemption date because of outstanding activity with the Bank, on the first available repurchase date after the stock was no longer required to support outstanding activity with the Bank.

The Framework sets forth the Bank’s practice of repurchasing the surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on a regular quarterly basis, at the Bank’s discretion and subject to certain statutory and regulatory requirements and to the Bank’s Risk Management Policy and capital plan limitations. Surplus capital stock is defined as any stock holdings in excess of 115% of a member’s minimum stock requirement. In addition, at the Bank’s discretion, all of the excess stock held by a member may be repurchased upon request of a member, subject to the requirements and limitations mentioned above. In accordance with the Framework, each quarter Bank management evaluates and determines the amount of capital stock to be repurchased in that quarter, if any, giving consideration to certain capital metrics and capital management objectives and strategies, and subject to the requirements and limitations mentioned above. At least 15 calendar days before any repurchase, the Bank will notify shareholders of its intention to repurchase capital stock and of the scheduled repurchase date. On the scheduled repurchase date, the Bank will calculate the amount of stock to be repurchased to ensure that each member and nonmember shareholder will continue to meet its minimum stock requirement after the repurchase.

On February 19, 2015,21, 2018, the Bank announced that it plans to repurchase $750 inthe surplus capital stock of all members and the excess capital stock of all nonmember shareholders on March 20, 2015. The amount of excess capital stock to be repurchased from each shareholder will be based on the total amount of capital stock (including mandatorily redeemable capital stock) outstanding to all shareholders on the repurchase date. The Bank will repurchase an equal percentage of each shareholder’s total capital stock to the extent that the shareholder has sufficient excess capital stock.16, 2018.

Excess capital stock totaled $1,118$493 as of December 31, 2014, and $2,4462017, which included surplus capital stock of $317. Excess capital stock totaled $488 as of December 31, 2013.2016, which included surplus capital stock of $325.


158156


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Concentration. The following table presents the concentration in capital stock held by institutions whose capital stock ownership represented 10% or more of the Bank’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of December 31, 20142017 or 2013.2016.

 2014 2013
Name of Institution
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

Citigroup Inc.:       
Citibank, N.A.(1)
$577
 14% $1,279
 23%
Banamex USA2
 
 1
 
Subtotal Citigroup Inc.579
 14
 1,280
 23
JPMorgan Chase & Co.:       
JPMorgan Bank & Trust Company, National Association268
 7
 594
 11
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
68
 2
 77
 1
Subtotal JPMorgan Chase & Co.336
 9
 671
 12
Subtotal915
 23
 1,951
 35
Others3,082
 77
 3,580
 65
Total$3,997
 100% $5,531
 100%
 2017 2016
Name of Institution
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Capital Stock
Outstanding

 
Percentage
of Total
Capital Stock
Outstanding

Charles Schwab Bank$405
 11% $81
 3%
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
307
 9
 400
 14
Subtotal712
 20
 481
 17
Others2,840
 80
 2,346
 83
Total$3,552
 100% $2,827
 100%

(1)The capital stock held by thesethis nonmember institutionsinstitution is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.

Note 16 — Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans

Defined Benefit Plans

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan. The Bank provides retirement benefits through a Bank-sponsored Cash Balance Plan, a qualified defined benefit plan. The Cash Balance Plan is provided to all employees who have completed six months of Bank service. Under the plan, each eligible Bank employee accrues benefits annually equal to 6% of the employee's annual compensation, plus 6% interest on the benefits accrued to the employee through the prior yearend. The Cash Balance Plan is funded through a qualified trust established by the Bank.

Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans. The Bank sponsors the following non-qualified defined benefit retirement plans:
Benefit Equalization Plan, a non-qualified retirement plan restoring benefits offered under the Cash Balance Plan that are limited by laws governing the plan. See below for further discussion of the defined contribution portion of the Benefit Equalization Plan.
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP), a non-qualified unfunded retirement benefit plan available to the Bank's eligible senior officers, which generally provides a service-linked supplemental cash balance annual contribution credit to SERP participants and an annual interest credit of 6% on the benefits accrued to the SERP participants through the prior yearend.
Deferred Compensation Plan, a non-qualified retirement plan available to all eligible Bank officers, which provides make-up pension benefits that would have been earned under the Cash Balance Plan had the compensation not been deferred. The make-up benefits vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Cash Balance Plan. See below for further discussion of the defined contribution portion of the Deferred Compensation Plan.
 
Postretirement Health Benefit Plan. The Bank provides a postretirement health benefit plan to employees hired before January 1, 2003. The Bank's costs are capped at 1998 health care premium amounts. As a result, changes in health care cost trend rates will have no effect on the Bank's accumulated postretirement benefit obligation or service and interest costs.

159

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




The following table summarizes the changes in the benefit obligations, plan assets, and funded status of the defined benefit Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013.2016.


 2014 2013
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Change in benefit obligation           
Benefit obligation, beginning of the period$37
 $21
 $2
 $36
 $18
 $2
Service cost2
 1
 
 3
 2
 
Interest cost2
 1
 
 1
 1
 
Amendments
 
 
 
 1
 
Actuarial gain/(loss)3
 
 
 (2) (1) 
Benefits paid(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Benefit obligation, end of the period43
 23
 2
 37
 21
 2
Change in plan assets           
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of the period38
 
 
 32
 
 
Actual return on plan assets2
 
 
 5
 
 
Employer contributions2
 
 
 2
 
 
Benefits paid(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Fair value of plan assets, end of the period41
 
 
 38
 
 
Funded status at the end of the period$(2) $(23) $(2) $1
 $(21) $(2)
157

Amounts recognized in the Statements of Condition at December 31, 2014 and 2013, consist of:

 2014 2013
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Other liabilities$(2) $(23) $(2) $1
 $(21) $(2)

Amounts recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2014 and 2013, consist of:

 2014 2013
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Net loss/(gain)$9
 $4
 $(2) $5
 $3
 $(2)
Prior service cost
 1
 
 
 1
 
AOCI$9
 $5
 $(2) $5
 $4
 $(2)

The following table presents information for pension plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2014 and 2013.


160

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2014 2013
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Projected benefit obligation$43
 $23
 $2
 $37
 $21
 $2
Accumulated benefit obligation41
 22
 2
 36
 20
 2
Fair value of plan assets41
 
 
 38
 
 
 2017 2016
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Change in benefit obligation           
Benefit obligation, beginning of the period$51
 $21
 $2
 $46
 $24
 $2
Service cost3
 2
 
 3
 1
 
Interest cost2
 1
 
 1
 1
 
Actuarial (gain)/loss2
 
 
 2
 1
 
Settlements
 (3) 
 
 (6) 
Benefits paid(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Benefit obligation, end of the period57
 21
 2
 51
 21
 2
Change in plan assets           
Fair value of plan assets, beginning of the period53
 
 
 43
 
 
Actual return on plan assets9
 
 
 3
 
 
Settlements
 (3) 
 
 (6) 
Employer contributions2
 3
 
 8
 6
 
Benefits paid(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Fair value of plan assets, end of the period63
 
 
 53
 
 
Funded status at the end of the period$6
 $(21) $(2) $2
 $(21) $(2)

Amounts recognized in the Statements of Condition at December 31, 2017 and 2016, consist of:

 2017 2016
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Other assets/(liabilities)$6
 $(21) $(2) $2
 $(21) $(2)

Amounts recognized in AOCI at December 31, 2017 and 2016, consist of:

 2017 2016
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 
Cash Balance
Plan

 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Net loss/(gain)$11
 $3
 $(1) $14
 $3
 $(1)

The following table presents information for pension plans with assets in excess of benefit obligations and for pension plans with benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31, 2017 and 2016.


158


Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2017 2016
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Projected benefit obligation$57
 $21
 $2
 $51
 $21
 $2
Accumulated benefit obligation56
 20
 2
 50
 21
 2
Fair value of plan assets63
 
 
 53
 
 

Components of the net periodic benefit costs and other amounts recognized in other comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, were as follows:

2014 2013 20122017 2016 2015
Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Net periodic benefit cost/(income)                                  
Service cost$2
 $1
 $
 $3
 $2
 $
 $3
 $1
 $
$3
 $2
 $
 $3
 $1
 $
 $3
 $1
 $
Interest cost2
 1
 
 1
 1
 
 1
 1
 
2
 1
 
 1
 1
 
 2
 1
 
Expected return on plan assets(3) 
 
 (3) 
 
 (2) 
 
(4) 
 
 (3) 
 
 (3) 
 
Amortization of net loss/(gain)
 
 
 1
 
 
 1
 
 
1
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 1
 (1)
Settlement loss
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Net periodic benefit cost1
 2
 
 2
 3
 
 3
 2
 
2
 3
 
 2
 3
 
 2
 3
 (1)
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income                                  
Net loss/(gain)4
 1
 
 (5) 
 (1) (1) 
 
(2) 
 
 3
 1
 
 3
 (1) 
Prior service cost
 
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 
Amortization of net loss/(gain)(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
 
 (1) 1
Prior service cost recognized due to settlement loss
 
 
 
 (1) 
 
 
 
Total recognized in other comprehensive income4
 1
 
 (5) 1
 (1) (1) 
 
(3)



 2
 
 
 3
 (2) 1
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$5
 $3
 $
 $(3) $4
 $(1) $2
 $2
 $
$(1) $3
 $
 $4
 $3
 $
 $5
 $1
 $

The amounts in AOCI expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost in 20152018 are de minimis.

Weighted average assumptions used to determine the benefit obligations at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, for the Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan were as follows:

2014 20132017 2016
Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 
Post-
retirement
Health
Benefit
Plan

 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 
Post-
retirement
Health
Benefit
Plan

 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Discount rate3.50% 3.50% 3.75% 4.25% 4.25% 4.75%3.25% 3.25% 3.50% 3.50% 3.50% 4.00%
Rate of salary increase3.00% through 2015
4.00% thereafter

 3.00% through 2015
4.00% thereafter

 
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter
 
3.00% through 2018, 4.00% thereafter
 3.00% through 2018, 4.00% thereafter
 
 3.00% through 2017
4.00% thereafter

 3.00% through 2017
4.00% thereafter

 

Weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012, for the Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan were as follows:
159


161

Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Weighted average assumptions used to determine the net periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, for the Cash Balance Plan, non-qualified defined benefit plans, and postretirement health benefit plan were as follows:

2014 2013 20122017 2016 2015
Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
 Cash Balance Plan
 Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plans
 Post-retirement Health Benefit Plan
Discount rate4.25% 4.25% 4.75% 3.25% 3.25% 3.75% 4.00% 4.00% 4.25%3.50% 3.50% 4.00% 3.75% 3.75% 4.00% 3.50% 3.50% 3.75%
Rate of salary increase3.00% through 2015
4.00% thereafter
 3.00% through 2015
4.00% thereafter
 
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter 
 4.00% 4.00% 
3.00% through 2017, 4.00% thereafter 3.00% through 2017, 4.00% thereafter 
 3.00% through 2016 4.00% thereafter 3.00% through 2016 4.00% thereafter 
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter
 3.00% through 2015 4.00% thereafter
 
Expected return on plan assets8.00% 
 
 8.00% 
 
 8.00% 
 
7.75% 
 
 7.75% 
 
 8.00% 
 

The Bank uses a discount rate to determine the present value of its future benefit obligations. The discount rate was determined based on the Citigroup Pension Discount Curve at the measurement date. The Citigroup Pension Discount Curve is a yield curve that reflects the market-observed yields for high-quality fixed income securities for each maturity. The projected benefit payments for each year from the plan are discounted using the spot rates on the yield curve to derive a single equivalent discount rate. The discount rate is reset annually on the measurement date.

The expected return on plan assets was determined based on: (i) the historical returns for each asset class, (ii) the expected future long-term returns for these asset classes, and (iii) the plan's target asset allocation.

The table below presents the fair values of the Cash Balance Plan's assets as of December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, by asset category. See Note 19 – Fair Value for further information regarding the three levels of fair value measurement.

2014 20132017 2016
Fair Value Measurement Using:   Fair Value Measurement Using:  Fair Value Measurement Using:   Fair Value Measurement Using:  
Asset CategoryLevel 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 Total
Cash and cash equivalents$1
 $
 $
 $1
 $1
 $
 $
 $1
$1
 $
 $
 $1
 $1
 $
 $
 $1
Equity mutual funds25
 
 
 25
 24
 
 
 24
40
 
 
 40
 32
 
 
 32
Fixed income mutual funds13
 
 
 13
 12
 
 
 12
18
 
 
 18
 16
 
 
 16
Real estate mutual funds1
 
 
 1
 1
 
 
 1
2
 
 
 2
 2
 
 
 2
Other mutual funds1
 
 
 1
 
 
 
 
2
 
 
 2
 2
 
 
 2
Total$41
 $
 $
 $41
 $38
 $
 $
 $38
$63
 $
 $
 $63
 $53
 $
 $
 $53

The Cash Balance Plan is administered by the Bank's Retirement Committee, which establishes the plan's Statement of Investment Policy and Objectives. The Retirement Committee has adopted a strategic asset allocation based on a stable distribution of assets among major asset classes. These asset classes include domestic large-, mid-, and small-capitalization equity investments; international equity investments; real return investments; and fixed income investments. The Retirement Committee has set the Cash Balance Plan's target allocation percentages for a mix range of 30% to 70%60% equity, 5% to 45%10% real return, and 10% to 40%30% fixed income. The Retirement Committee reviews the performance of the Cash Balance Plan on a regular basis.

The Cash Balance Plan's weighted average asset allocation at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, by asset category was as follows:


162160


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)




Asset Category2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Cash and cash equivalents4% 2%2% 3%
Equity mutual funds61
 62
63
 61
Fixed income mutual funds31
 32
28
 29
Real estate mutual funds2
 2
4
 4
Other mutual funds2
 2
3
 3
Total100% 100%100% 100%

The Bank contributed $2 in 20142017 and expects to contribute $2$3 in 20152018 to the Cash Balance Plan. The Bank contributed $3 in 2017 and expects to contribute a de minimis amount in 2014 and expects to contribute $6 in 20152018 to the non-qualified defined benefit plans and postretirement health benefit plan.

The following are the estimated future benefit payments, which reflect expected future service, as appropriate:

Year
Cash Balance
Plan

 
Non-Qualified
Defined Benefit
Plans

 
Postretirement
Health Benefit
Plan

2015$3
 $6
 $
20163
 1
 
20173
 1
 
20183
 4
 
20193
 1
 
2020 – 202420
 15
 
Year
Cash Balance
Plan

 
Non-Qualified
Defined Benefit
Plans

 
Postretirement
Health Benefit
Plan

2018$4
 $
 $
20194
 5
 
20204
 
 
20214
 1
 
202216
 6
 
2023 – 202720
 14
 1

Defined Contribution Plans

Retirement Savings Plan. The Bank sponsors a qualified defined contribution retirement 401(k) savings plan, the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco Savings Plan (Savings Plan). Contributions to the Savings Plan consist of elective participant contributions of up to 20% of each participant's base compensation and a Bank matching contribution of up to 6% of each participant's base compensation. The Bank contributed approximately $2, $2, and $2 during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively.

Benefit Equalization Plan. The Bank sponsors a non-qualified retirement plan restoring benefits offered under the Savings Plan that have been limited by laws governing the plan. Contributions made during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, were de minimis.

Deferred Compensation Plan. The Bank maintains a deferred compensation plan that is available to all eligible Bank officers. The defined contribution portion of the plan is comprised of two components: (i) officer or director deferral of current compensation, and (ii) make-up matching contributions for officers that would have been made by the Bank under the Savings Plan had the compensation not been deferred. The make-up benefits under the Deferred Compensation Plan vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Savings Plan. The Deferred Compensation Plan liability consists of the accumulated compensation deferrals and accrued earnings on the deferrals, as well as the make-up matching contributions and any accrued earnings on the contributions. The Bank's obligation for this plan at December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, was $33, $30,$44, $37, and $25,$35, respectively.

Incentive Compensation Plans

The Bank provides incentive compensation plans for many of its employees, including senior officers. Other liabilities include $12$13 and $12$13 for incentive compensation at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.


163161


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Note 17 — Segment Information

The Bank uses an analysis of financial performanceresults based on the balancesfinancial components and adjusted net interest income of two operating segments, the advances-related business and the mortgage-related business, as well as other financial information, to review and assess financial performance and determine financial management strategies related to determine the allocationoperations of resources to these two major business segments. For purposes of segment reporting, adjusted net interest income includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges that are recorded in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities” in other income and excludes interest expense that is recorded in “Mandatorily redeemable capital stock.” Other key financial information, such as any credit-related OTTI losses on the Bank’s PLRMBS, other expenses, and assessments, is not included in the segment reporting analysis, but is incorporated into the Bank’s overall assessment of financial performance.

The advances-related business consists of advances and other credit products, related financing and hedging
instruments, other non-MBS investments associated with the Bank's role as a liquidity provider, and capital.
Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield
on all assets associated with the business activities in this segment and the cost of funding those activities, including cash flows
the net settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements, and from earnings on invested capital.

The mortgage-related business consists of MBS investments, mortgage loans acquired through the MPF Program,
the consolidated obligations specifically identified as funding those assets, and related hedging instruments.
Adjusted net interest income for this segment is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the yield
on the MBS and mortgage loans and the cost of the consolidated obligations funding those assets, includingassets. This includes the cash flowsnet settlements from associated interest rate exchange agreements and net accretion related income, which is a result of improvement in expected cash flows on certain other-than-temporarily-impaired PLRMBS, less the provision for credit losses on mortgage loans.

The following table presents the Bank’s adjusted net interest income by operating segment and reconciles total adjusted net interest income to income before the AHP assessment for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 2012.2015.
 
Advances-
Related
Business

 
Mortgage-
Related
Business(1)

 
Adjusted
Net
Interest
Income

 
Amortization
of Basis
Adjustments(2)

 

Income/(Expense)
on Economic
Hedges(3)

 
Interest
Expense on
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital
Stock(4)

 
Net
Interest
Income After Mortgage Loan Loss Provision

 
Other
Income/
(Loss)

 
Other
Expense

 
Income
Before AHP
Assessment

2014$166
 $410
 $576
 $(19) $(64) $120
 $539
 $(154) $144
 $241
2013175
 449
 624
 (48) 34
 155
 483
 5
 128
 360
2012274
 512
 786
 (104) (10) 51
 849
 (164) 134
 551
 
Advances-
Related
Business

 
Mortgage-
Related
Business(1)

 
Adjusted
Net
Interest
Income

 
Amortization
of Basis
Adjustments(2)

 

Income/(Expense)
on Economic
Hedges(3)

 
Interest
Expense on
Mandatorily
Redeemable
Capital
Stock(4)

 
Net
Interest
Income After Mortgage Loan Loss Provision

 
Other
Income/
(Loss)

 
Other
Expense

 
Income
Before AHP
Assessment

2017$234
 $325
 $559
 $
 $(40) $32
 $567
 $78
 $224
 $421
2016154
 338
 492
 (7) (32) 60
 471
 485
 158
 798
2015155
 351
 506
 (17) (18) 65
 476
 388
 148
 716

(1)DoesThe mortgage-related business includes total accretion or amortization associated with other-than-temporarily impaired PLRMBS, which are recognized in interest income, totaled $93, $101, and $82 for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. The mortgage-related business does not include credit-related OTTI losses of $4, $7$16, $16, and $44$15 for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012,2015, respectively.
(2)
Represents amortization of amounts deferred for adjusted net interest income purposes only, in accordance with the Bank’s Excess Stock Repurchase, Retained Earnings, and Dividend Framework.
(3)
The Bank includes income and expense associated with net settlements from economic hedges in adjusted net interest income in its analysis of financial performance for its two operating segments. For financial reporting purposes, the Bank does not include these amounts in net interest income in the Statements of Income, but instead records them in other income in “Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities.”
(4)
The Bank excludes interest expense on mandatorily redeemable capital stock from adjusted net interest income in its analysis of financial performance for its two operating segments.

The following table presents total assets by operating segment at December 31, 20142017, 2013,2016, and 2012.2015.

162
  
Advances-
Related Business

 
Mortgage-
Related Business

 
Total
Assets

2014$55,424
 $20,383
 $75,807
201362,297
 23,477
 85,774
201262,306
 24,115
 86,421

164

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



  
Advances-
Related Business

 
Mortgage-
Related Business

 
Total
Assets

2017$103,426
 $19,959
 $123,385
201674,018
 17,923
 91,941
201569,047
 16,651
 85,698

Note 18 — Derivatives and Hedging Activities

General. The Bank may enter into interest rate swaps (including callable, putable, and basis swaps); swaptions; and cap floor, corridor, and collarfloor agreements (collectively, interest rate exchange agreements or derivatives). Most of the Bank’s interest rate exchange agreements are executed in conjunction with the origination of advances andor the issuance of consolidated obligation bonds to create variable rate structures. The interest rate exchange agreements are generally executed at the same time the advances and bonds are transacted and generally have the same maturity dates as the related advances and bonds. The Bank transacts most of its derivatives with large banks and major broker-dealers. Some of these banks and broker-dealers or their affiliates buy, sell, and distribute consolidated obligations. Over-the-counter derivatives may be either uncleared or cleared. In an uncleared derivative transaction, the Bank’s counterparty is the executing bank or broker-dealer. In a cleared derivative transaction, the Bank may execute the transaction either directly with the executing bank or broker-dealer or on a swap execution facility, but in either case, the Bank’s counterparty is a derivatives clearing organization or clearinghouse once the derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing. The Bank is not a derivativederivatives dealer and does not trade derivatives for short-term profit.

Additional uses of interest rate exchange agreements include: (i) offsetting embedded features in assets and liabilities, (ii) hedging anticipated issuance of debt, (iii) matching against consolidated obligation discount notes or bonds to create the equivalent of callable or non-callable fixed rate debt, (iv) modifying the repricing frequency of assets and liabilities, (v) matching against certain advances and consolidated obligations for which the Bank elected the fair value option, and (vi) exactly offsetting other derivatives that may be executed with members (with the Bank serving as an intermediary) or cleared at a derivatives clearing organization. The Bank’s use of interest rate exchange agreements results in one of the following classifications: (i) a fair value hedge of an underlying financial instrument, (ii) an economic hedge of a specific assetassets or liability,liabilities, or (iii) an intermediary transaction for members.

The Bank primarily uses the following derivative instruments:

Interest Rate Swaps – An interest rate swap is an agreement between two entities to exchange cash flows in the future. The agreement sets the dates on which the cash flows will be paid and the manner in which the cash flows will be calculated. One of the simplest forms of an interest rate swap involves the promise by one party to pay cash flows equivalent to the interest on a notional principal amount at a predetermined fixed rate for a given period of time. In return for this promise, the party receives cash flows equivalent to the interest on the same notional principal amount at a variable rate for the same period of time. The variable rate received or paid by the Bank in most interest rate exchange agreements is either indexed to LIBOR.

Swaptions – A swaption is an option on aLIBOR or to the overnight index swap that gives the buyer the right to enter into a specified interest rate swap at a certain time in the future. When used as a hedge, for example, a swaption can protect the Bank against future interest rate changes when it is planning to lend or borrow funds in the future.rate.

Interest Rate Caps and Floors – In a cap agreement, additional cash flow is generated if the price or interest rate of an underlying variable rate rises above a certain threshold (or cap) price. In a floor agreement, additional cash flow is generated if the price or interest rate of an underlying variable rate falls below a certain threshold (or floor) price. Caps and floors may be used in conjunction with assets or liabilities. In general, caps and floors are designed as protection against the interest rate on a variable rate asset or liability rising above or falling below a certain level.

Hedging Activities. The Bank documents at inception all relationships between derivativederivatives designated as hedging instruments and hedged items, its risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions, and its method of assessing hedge effectiveness. This process includes linking all derivatives that areDerivatives designated as fair value or cash flow hedges to:may be transacted to hedge: (i) assets and liabilities on the balance sheet,Statement of Condition, (ii) firm commitments, or (iii) forecasted transactions. The Bank also formally assesses (both at the hedge’shedge inception and on an ongoing basis) whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions have been effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of hedged items attributable to the hedged risk and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain effective in future periods. The Bank typically uses regression analyses or other statistical analyses to assess the effectiveness of its hedges.

165163


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



derivatives have been effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of hedged items attributable to the hedged risk and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain effective hedges in future periods. The Bank typically uses regression analyses or other statistical analyses to assess the effectiveness of its hedges. When it is determined that a derivative has not been or is not expected to be effective as a hedge, the Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively.

The Bank discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it determines that the derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in the fair value or cash flows of a hedged item (including hedged items such as firm commitments or forecasted transactions); (ii) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the forecasted transaction will occur in the originally expected period; (iv) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; (v) it determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate; or (vi) it decides to use the derivative to offset changes in the fair value of other derivatives or instruments carried at fair value.

Intermediation As an additional service to its members, the Bank has in the past entered into offsetting interest rate exchange agreements, acting as an intermediary between offsetting derivative transactions with members and other counterparties. This intermediation allows members indirect access to the derivatives market. Derivatives in which the Bank is an intermediary may also arise when the Bank enters into derivatives to offset the economic effect of other derivatives that are no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations. The offsetting derivatives used in intermediary activities do not receive hedge accounting treatment and are separately marked to market through earnings. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives does not significantly affect the operating results of the Bank.

The Bank had no interest rate exchange agreements associated with derivatives with members or offsetting derivatives with other counterparties at December 31, 2014. The notional principalmay have the following types of the interest rate exchange agreements associated with derivatives with members or offsetting derivatives with other counterparties was $330 at December 31, 2013. The Bank did not have any interest rate exchange agreements outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, that were used to offset the economic effect of other derivatives that were no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations.hedged items:

Investments The Bank may invest in U.S. Treasury and agency obligations, agency MBS, and the taxable portion of highly rated state or local housing finance agency obligations. In the past, the Bank has also invested in PLRMBS rated AAA at the time of acquisition. The interest rate and prepayment risk associated with these investment securities is managed through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank may manage prepayment risk and interest rate risk by funding investment securities with consolidated obligations that have call features or by hedging the prepayment risk with a combination of consolidated obligations and callable swaps or swaptions.swaps. The Bank may execute callable swaps and purchase swaptions in conjunction with the issuance of certain liabilities to create funding that is economically equivalent to fixed rate callable debt. Although these derivatives are economic hedges against prepayment risk and are designated to individual liabilities, they do not receive either fair value or cash flow hedge accounting treatment. Investment securities may be classified as trading, AFS, or HTM.

The Bank may also manage the risk arising from changing market prices or cash flows of investment securities classified as trading by entering into interest rate exchange agreements (economic hedges) that offset the changes in fair value or cash flows of the securities. The market value changes of both the trading securities and the associated interest rate exchange agreements are included in other income in the Statements of Income.

Advances The Bank offers a wide arrayrange of advances structures to meet members’ funding needs. These advances may have maturities up to 30 years with fixed or adjustable rates and may include early termination features or options. The Bank may use derivatives to adjust the repricing and options characteristics of advances to more closely match the characteristics of the Bank’s funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed or variable rate advance with embedded options, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the advance. The combination of the advance and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates a variable rate asset. This type of hedge receives fair value option accounting treatment.


166

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



In addition, for certain advances for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, the Bank will simultaneously execute an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the terms of the advance.

Mortgage Loans The Bank’s investment portfolio includes fixed rate mortgage loans. The prepayment options embedded in mortgage loans can result in extensions or contractions in the expected repayment of these investments, depending on changes in estimated prepayment speeds. The Bank manages the interest rate risk and prepayment risk associated with fixed rate mortgage loans through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. The Bank uses both callable and non-callable debt to achieve cash flow patterns and market value sensitivities for liabilities similar to those expected on the mortgage loans. Net income could be reduced if the Bank replaces prepaid mortgagesmortgage loans with lower-yielding assets and the Bank’s higher funding costs are not reduced accordingly.


164


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank executes callable swaps and purchases swaptions in conjunction with the issuance of certain consolidated obligations to create funding that is economically equivalent to fixed rate callable bonds. Although these derivatives are economic hedges against the prepayment risk of specific loan pools and are referenced to individual liabilities, they do not receive either fair value or cash flow hedge accounting treatment.

Consolidated Obligations – Consolidated obligation bonds may be structured to meet the Bank’s or the investors’ needs. Common structures include fixed rate bonds with or without call options and adjustable rate bonds with or without embedded options. In general, when bonds are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that offset the terms and embedded options, if any, of the consolidated obligation bond. This combination of the consolidated obligation bond and the interest rate exchange agreement effectively creates an adjustable rate bond. The cost of this funding combination is generally lower than the cost that would be available through the issuance of an adjustable rate bond alone. These transactions generally receive fair value hedge accounting treatment.

When the Bank issues consolidated obligation discount notes, it may also simultaneously enter into an interest rate exchange agreement to convert the fixed rate discount note to an adjustable rate discount note. This type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge.

In addition, when certain consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank has elected the fair value option are issued, the Bank simultaneously executes an interest rate exchange agreement with terms that economically offset the terms of the consolidated obligation bond. However, this type of hedge is treated as an economic hedge because these combinations generally do not meet the requirements for fair value hedge accounting treatment.

Intermediation and Offsetting Derivatives As an additional service to its members, the Bank has in the past entered into offsetting interest rate exchange agreements, acting as an intermediary between offsetting derivative transactions with members and other counterparties. This intermediation allows members indirect access to the derivatives market. The Bank didalso enters into derivatives to offset the economic effect of other derivatives that are no longer designated to advances, investments, or consolidated obligations. Neither type of offsetting derivatives receives hedge accounting treatment and both are separately marked to market through earnings. The net result of the accounting for these derivatives does not havesignificantly affect the operating results of the Bank.

The notional principal of the interest rate exchange agreements associated with derivatives with members or offsetting derivatives with other counterparties was $14 and $89, at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The notional amount of an interest rate exchange agreement serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid. However, the notional amount of derivatives represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor the overall exposure of the Bank to credit risk and market risk. The risks of derivatives can be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis by taking into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged, and any consolidated obligations denominatedoffsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged.

The following table summarizes the notional amount and fair value of derivative instruments, including the effect of netting adjustments and cash collateral as of December 31, 2017 and 2016. For purposes of this disclosure, the derivative values include the fair value of derivatives and related accrued interest.


165


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



 2017 2016
 
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

 
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:           
Interest rate swaps$24,270
 $92
 $27
 $20,741
 $67
 $32
Total24,270
 92
 27
 20,741
 67
 32
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:           
Interest rate swaps73,760
 81
 57
 42,135
 67
 49
Interest rate caps and floors1,563
 1
 1
 2,180
 6
 
Mortgage delivery commitments16
 
 
 13
 
 
Total75,339
 82
 58
 44,328
 73
 49
Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments$99,609
 174
 85
 $65,069
 140
 81
Netting adjustments and cash collateral(1)
  (91) (84)   (74) (79)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities  $83
 $1
   $66
 $2

(1)
Amounts include the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral and related accrued interest, where the netting requirements have been met. Cash collateral posted and related accrued interest was $10 and $22 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Cash collateral received and related accrued interest was $18 and $16 at December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table presents the components of net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities as presented in currencies other than U.S. dollars outstanding duringthe Statements of Income for the years ended 2014December 31, 2017, 20132016, or 2012.and 2015.
 2017
 2016
 2015
 Gain/(Loss)
 Gain/(Loss)
 Gain/(Loss)
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:     
Interest rate swaps$(1) $(2) $(10)
Total net gain/(loss) related to fair value hedge ineffectiveness(1) (2) (10)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     
Economic hedges:     
Interest rate swaps8
 39
 13
Interest rate caps and floors(5) (1) (3)
Net settlements(40) (32) (18)
Mortgage delivery commitments24
 5
 2
Total net gain/(loss) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(13) 11
 (6)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities$(14) $9
 $(16)

The following tables present, by type of hedged item, the gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the Bank’s net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015.




166


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Hedged Item Type
Gain/(Loss)
on Derivatives

 Gain /(Loss) on Hedged Item
 
Net Fair
Value Hedge
Ineffectiveness

 
Effect of
Derivatives on
Net Interest Income(1)

Year ended December 31, 2017:       
Advances$63
 $(66) $(3) $(27)
Consolidated obligation bonds(41) 43
 2
 27
Total$22
 $(23) $(1) $
Year ended December 31, 2016:       
Advances$63
 $(62) $1
 $(55)
Consolidated obligation bonds(135) 132
 (3) 180
Total$(72) $70
 $(2) $125
Year ended December 31, 2015:       
Advances$19
 $(20) $(1) $(106)
Consolidated obligation bonds(170) 161
 (9) 257
Total$(151) $141
 $(10) $151

(1)
The net interest on derivatives in fair value hedge relationships is presented in the interest income/expense line item of the respective hedged item.

Credit Risk – The Bank is subject to credit risk as a result of the risk of potential nonperformance by counterparties to the derivativeinterest rate exchange agreements. All of the Bank’s agreements governing uncleared derivative transactions contain master netting provisions to help mitigate the credit risk exposure to each counterparty. The Bank manages counterparty credit risk through credit analyses and collateral requirements and by following the requirements of the Bank’s risk management policies, and credit guidelines, and Finance Agency and other regulations. The Bank also requires collateralcredit support agreements with collateral delivery thresholds on all uncleared derivatives. In addition, collateral related to derivative transactions with member institutions includes collateral pledged to the Bank, as evidenced by the Advances and Security Agreement, which may be held by the member institution for the benefit of the Bank.

For cleared derivatives, the clearinghouse is the Bank’s counterparty. The requirement that the Bank post initial and variation margin through thea clearing agent, to the clearinghouse, exposes the Bank to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. The use of cleared derivatives, however, mitigates the Bank’s overall credit risk exposure because a central counterparty is substituted for individual counterparties and variation margin is posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives through a clearing agent. The Bank has analyzed the enforceability of offsetting rights applicable to its cleared derivative transactions and determined that the exercise of those offsetting rights by a non-defaulting party under these transactions should be upheld under applicable bankruptcy law and Commodity Futures Trading Commission rules in the event of a clearinghouse or clearing agent insolvency and under applicable clearinghouse rules upon a non-insolvency-based

167

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



event of default of the clearinghouse or clearing agent. Based on this analysis, the Bank presents a net derivative receivable or payable for all of its transactions through a particular clearing agent with a particular clearinghouse.

Based on the Bank’s credit analyses and the collateral requirements, the Bank does not expect to incur any credit losses on its derivative transactions.
The notional amount of an interest rate exchange agreement serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments or cash flows received and paid. However, the notional amount of derivatives represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor the overall exposure of the Bank to credit risk and market risk. The risks of derivatives can be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis by taking into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged, and any offsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged.

The Bank’s agreements for uncleared derivative transactions contain provisions that link the Bank’s credit rating from Moody’s Investors Service and Standard & Poor’sS&P Global Ratings to various rights and obligations. Certain of these derivative agreements provide that, if the Bank’s long-term debt rating falls below a specified rating (ranging from A3/A- (and in one agreement, below A2/A)to Baa3/BBB-), the Bank’s counterparty would have the right, but not the obligation, to terminate all of its outstanding derivative transactions with the Bank; the Bank’s agreements with its clearing agents for cleared derivative transactions have similar provisions with respect to the debt rating of FHLBank System consolidated bonds. If this occurs, the Bank may choose to enter into replacement hedges, either by transferring the existing transactions to another counterparty or entering into new replacement transactions, based on prevailing market rates. In addition, under some of its agreements for uncleared derivative transactions, the amount of collateral that the Bank is required to deliver to a counterparty depends on the Bank’s credit rating. The aggregate fair value of all uncleared derivative instruments with credit-risk-relatedcredit risk-related contingent features that were in a net derivative liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest) at December 31, 2014, was $56, for which the Bank had posted collateral with a fair value of $38 in the ordinary course of business. If the Bank’s credit rating at December 31, 2014, had been lowered from its current rating to the next lower rating, that would have triggered additional collateral to be delivered, and the Bank would have been required to deliver up to a total of $11 of collateral (at fair value) to its derivative counterparties at December 31, 2014.

The following table summarizes the fair value of derivative instruments including the effect of netting adjustments and cash collateral as of December 31, 2014 and 2013. For purposes of this disclosure, the derivative values include the fair value of derivatives and related accrued interest.

 2014 2013
 
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

 
Notional
Amount of
Derivatives

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:           
Interest rate swaps$28,018
 $374
 $103
 $31,395
 $572
 $156
Total28,018
 374
 103
 31,395
 572
 156
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:           
Interest rate swaps31,973
 72
 129
 49,715
 146
 242
Interest rate caps, floors, corridors, and/or collars2,306
 9
 1
 460
 2
 4
Total34,279
 81
 130
 50,175
 148
 246
Total derivatives before netting and collateral adjustments$62,297
 455
 233
 $81,570
 720
 402
Netting adjustments and cash collateral(1)
  (396) (213)   (604) (355)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities  $59
 $20
   $116
 $47
167


168

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



(1)
Amounts include the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral and related accrued interest, where the netting requirements have been met. Cash collateral posted was $65 and $53 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Cash collateral received was $248 and $302 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively.

The following table presents the components ofin a net gain/(loss) on derivativesderivative liability position (before cash collateral and hedging activities as presented in the Statements of Income for the years endedrelated accrued interest) at December 31, 20142017, 2013, and 2012.was $6, for which the Bank had posted cash collateral of $6 in the ordinary course of business.
 2014 2013 2012
 Gain/(Loss)
 Gain/(Loss)
 Gain/(Loss)
Derivatives and hedged items in fair value hedging relationships – hedge ineffectiveness by derivative type:     
Interest rate swaps$(12) $(2) $(19)
Total net gain/(loss) related to fair value hedge ineffectiveness(12) (2) (19)
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:     
Economic hedges:     
Interest rate swaps26
 (8) (73)
Interest rate caps, floors, corridors and/or collars(14) 2
 1
Net settlements(64) 34
 (10)
Total net gain/(loss) related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(52) 28
 (82)
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities$(64) $26
 $(101)

The following table presents, by type of hedged item, the gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedging relationships and the impact of those derivatives on the Bank’s net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013, and 2012.

Hedged Item Type
Gain/(Loss)
on Derivatives

 
Gain/(Loss)
on Hedged Item

 
Net Fair
Value Hedge
Ineffectiveness

 
Effect of
Derivatives on
Net Interest Income(1)

Year ended December 31, 2014:       
Advances$23
 $(23) $
 $(128)
Consolidated obligation bonds(189) 177
 (12) 260
Total$(166) $154
 $(12) $132
Year ended December 31, 2013:       
Advances$178
 $(175) $3
 $(126)
Consolidated obligation bonds(373) 368
 (5) 366
Total$(195) $193
 $(2) $240
Year ended December 31, 2012:       
Advances$(32) $32
 $
 $(143)
Consolidated obligation bonds(259) 240
 (19) 519
Total$(291) $272
 $(19) $376

(1)
The net interest on derivatives in fair value hedge relationships is presented in the interest income/expense line item of the respective hedged item.

The Bank may present derivative instruments, related cash collateral received or pledged, and associated accrued interest by clearing agent or by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met.

The following table presents separately the fair value of derivative assets and derivative liabilities that have met the netting requirements, including the related collateral received from or pledged to counterparties as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.


169

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
 Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements   Derivative Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements  
 Gross Recognized Amount Gross Amounts of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities Gross Recognized Amount Gross Amounts of Netting Adjustments and Cash Collateral Total Derivative Assets and Total Derivative Liabilities
            
Derivative Assets           
Uncleared$35
 $(33) $2
 $41
 $(37) $4
Cleared139
 (58) 81
 99
 (37) 62
Total    $83
     $66
Derivative Liabilities           
Uncleared$29
 $(28) $1
 $37
 $(35) $2
Cleared56
 (56) 
 44
 (44) 
Total    $1
     $2



 2014 2013
 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

 
Derivative
Assets

 
Derivative
Liabilities

Derivative instruments meeting netting requirements       
Gross recognized amount       
Uncleared derivatives$352
 $199
 $699
 $395
Cleared derivatives103
 34
 21
 7
Total gross recognized amount455
 233
 720
 402
Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral       
Uncleared derivatives(324) (179) (604) (348)
Cleared derivatives(72) (34) 
 (7)
Total gross amount of netting adjustments and cash collateral(396) (213) (604) (355)
Total derivative assets and total derivative liabilities       
Uncleared derivatives28
 20
 95
 47
Cleared derivatives31
 
 21
 
Total derivative assets and derivative liabilities presented in the Statements of Condition59
 20
 116
 47
Non-cash collateral received or pledged not offset       
Can be sold or repledged - Uncleared derivatives25
 
 89
 
Net unsecured amount       
Uncleared derivatives3
 20
 6
 47
Cleared derivatives31
 
 21
 
Total net unsecured amount$34
 $20
 $27
 $47

Note 19 — Fair Value

The following fair value amounts have been determined by the Bank using available market information and the Bank’s best judgment of appropriate valuation methods. These estimates are based on pertinent information available to the Bank at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016. Although the Bank uses its best judgment in estimating the fair value of these financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any estimation technique or valuation methodology. For example, because an active secondary market does not exist for a portion of the Bank’s financial instruments, in certain cases fair values cannot be precisely quantified or verified and may change as economic and market factors and evaluation of those factors change. The Bank continues to refine its valuation methodologies as markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent. While the Bank believes that its valuation methodologies are appropriate and consistent with those of other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a materially different estimate of fair value as of the reporting date. Therefore, the fair values are not necessarily indicative of the amounts that would be realized in current market transactions, although they do reflect the Bank’s judgment as to how a market participant would estimate the fair values. The fair value summary table does not represent an estimate of the overall market value of the Bank as a going concern, which would take into account future business opportunities and the net profitability of total assets and liabilities.

The following tables present the carrying value, the estimated fair value, and the fair value hierarchy level of the Bank’s financial instruments at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.


170168


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2014December 31, 2017
Carrying
Value

 Estimated Fair Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Netting Adjustments(1)

Carrying
Value

 Estimated Fair Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Netting Adjustments(1)

Assets                      
Cash and due from banks$3,920
 $3,920

$3,920

$
 $
 $
$31
 $31

$31

$
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 1,115
 1,115
 
 
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,000
 1,000
 
 1,000
 
 
11,750
 11,750
 
 11,750
 
 
Federal funds sold7,503
 7,503
 
 7,503
 
 
11,028
 11,029
 
 11,029
 
 
Trading securities3,524
 3,524
 
 3,524
 
 
1,164
 1,164
 
 1,164
 
 
AFS securities6,371
 6,371
 
 
 6,371
 
3,833
 3,833
 
 
 3,833
 
HTM securities13,551
 13,657
 
 11,521
 2,136
 
14,680
 14,704
 
 13,697
 1,007
 
Advances38,986
 39,060
 
 39,060
 
 
77,382
 77,437
 
 77,437
 
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans708
 769
 
 769
 
 
2,076
 2,075
 
 2,075
 
 
Accrued interest receivable67
 67
 
 67
 
 
119
 119
 
 119
 
 
Derivative assets, net(1)
59
 59
 
 455
 
 (396)83
 83
 
 174
 
 (91)
Other assets(2)
11
 11
 11
 
 
 
9
 9
 9
 
 
 
Liabilities                      
Deposits160
 160
 
 160
 
 
281
 281
 
 281
 
 
Consolidated obligations:                      
Bonds47,045
 47,021
 
 47,021
 
 
85,063
 84,938
 
 84,938
 
 
Discount notes21,811
 21,811
 
 21,811
 
 
30,440
 30,437
 
 30,437
 
 
Total consolidated obligations68,856
 68,832
 
 68,832
 
 
115,503
 115,375
 
 115,375
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock719
 719

719


 
 
309
 309

309


 
 
Accrued interest payable95

95



95
 
 
116

116



116
 
 
Derivative liabilities, net(1)
20
 20
 
 233
 
 (213)1
 1
 
 85
 
 (84)
Other                      
Standby letters of credit12
 12



12
 
 
19
 19



19
 
 
Commitments to fund advances(3)

 2
 
 2
 
 


171169


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2013December 31, 2016
Carrying
Value

 Estimated Fair Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Netting Adjustments(1)

Carrying
Value

 Estimated Fair Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Netting Adjustments(1)

Assets                      
Cash and due from banks$4,906
 $4,906
 $4,906
 $
 $
 $
$2
 $2
 $2
 $
 $
 $
Interest-bearing deposits590
 590
 590
 
 
 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell15,500
 15,500
 
 15,500
 
 
Federal funds sold7,498
 7,498
 
 7,498
 
 
4,214
 4,214
 
 4,214
 
 
Trading securities3,208
 3,208
 
 3,208
 
 
2,066
 2,066
 
 2,066
 
 
AFS securities7,047
 7,047
 
 
 7,047
 
4,489
 4,489
 
 
 4,489
 
HTM securities17,507
 17,352
 
 14,802
 2,550
 
14,127
 14,141
 
 12,788
 1,353
 
Advances44,395
 44,457
 
 44,457
 
 
49,845
 49,921
 
 49,921
 
 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans905
 956
 
 956
 
 
826
 845
 
 845
 
 
Accrued interest receivable81
 81
 
 81
 
 
79
 79
 
 79
 
 
Derivative assets, net(1)
116
 116
 
 720
 
 (604)66
 66
 
 140
 
 (74)
Other assets(2)
10
 10
 10
 
 
 
11
 11
 11
 
 
 
Liabilities                      
Deposits193
 193
 
 193
 
 
169
 169
 
 169
 
 
Consolidated obligations:                      
Bonds53,207
 52,940
 
 52,940
 
 
50,224
 50,188
 
 50,188
 
 
Discount notes24,194
 24,195
 
 24,195
 
 
33,506
 33,505
 
 33,505
 
 
Total consolidated obligations77,401
 77,135
 
 77,135
 
 
83,730
 83,693
 
 83,693
 
 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock2,071
 2,071
 2,071
 
 
 
457
 457
 457
 
 
 
Borrowings from other FHLBanks1,345
 1,345
 
 1,345
 
 
Accrued interest payable95
 95
 
 95
 
 
67
 67
 
 67
 
 
Derivative liabilities, net(1)
47
 47
 
 402
 
 (355)2
 2
 
 81
 
 (79)
Other                      
Standby letters of credit12
 12
 
 12
 
 
24
 24
 
 24
 
 
Commitments to fund advances(3)

 (1) 
 (1) 
 

(1)
Amounts include the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral and related accrued interest, where the netting requirements have been met.
(2)Represents publicly traded mutual funds held in a grantor trust.
(3)
Estimated fair values of these commitments are presented as a net gain or (loss). For more information regarding these commitments, see Note 20 – Commitments and Contingencies.

Fair Value Hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the fair value methodologies and valuation techniques as well as the inputs to the valuation techniques used to measure fair value for assets and liabilities carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition. The inputs are evaluated and an overall level for the fair value measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of market observability of the fair value measurement for the asset or liability. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). An entity must disclose the level within the fair value hierarchy in which the measurements are classified for all financial assets and liabilities measured on a recurring or non-recurring basis.

The application of the fair value hierarchy to the Bank’s financial assets and financial liabilities that are carried at fair value either on a recurring or non-recurring basis is as follows:
Level 1 – Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that the reporting entity can access on the measurement date.
Level 2 – Inputs other than quoted prices within Level 1 that are observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual) term, a Level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include the following: (1) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (2) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; (3) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals,

172170


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals, and implied volatilities); and (4) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3 – Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

A financial instrument’s categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

The following assets and liabilities, including those for which the Bank has elected the fair value option, are carried at fair value on the Statements of Condition as of December 31, 20142017:
Trading securities
AFS securities
Certain advances
Derivative assets and liabilities
Certain consolidated obligation bonds
Certain other assets

For instruments carried at fair value, the Bank reviews the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the valuation inputs may result in a reclassification of certain assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in or out as of the beginning of the quarter in which the changes occur. For the periods presented, the Bank did not have any reclassifications for transfers in or out of the fair value hierarchy levels.

Summary of Valuation Methodologies and Primary Inputs.

Cash and Due from Banks The estimated fair value equals the carrying value.

Federal Funds Sold and Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell – The estimated fair value of overnight Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell approximates the carrying value. The estimated fair value of term Federal funds sold and term securities purchased under agreements to resell has been determined by calculating the present value of expected cash flows for the instruments and reducing the amount for accrued interest receivable. The discount rates used in these calculations are the replacement rates for comparable instruments with similar terms.
 
Investment Securities Certificates of DepositInterest-Bearing Deposits The estimatedfair value of deposits is generally equal to the carrying value of the deposits because the deposits are primarily overnight deposits or due on demand. The Bank determines the fair values of these investments are determinedterm deposits by calculating the present value of expected future cash flows from the deposits and reducing the amount for accrued interest receivable, using market-observable inputs as of the last business day of the period or using industry standard analytical models and certain actual and estimated market information.receivable. The discount rates used in these calculations are the replacement rates for comparable instrumentscost of deposits with similar terms.

Investment Securities MBS – To value its MBS, the Bank obtains prices from fourmultiple designated third-party pricing vendors when available. The pricing vendors use various proprietary models to price these securities. The inputs to those models are derived from various sources including, but not limited to: benchmark yields, reported trades, dealer estimates, issuer spreads, prices on benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data. Since many securities do not trade on a daily basis, the pricing vendors use available information as applicable, such as benchmark yield curves, benchmarking of like securities, sector groupings, and matrix pricing, to determine the prices for individual securities. Each pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all security valuations, which facilitates resolution of price discrepancies identified by the Bank.

At least annually, the Bank conducts reviews of the fourmultiple pricing vendors to update and confirm its understanding of the vendors’ pricing processes, methodologies, and control procedures.


173171


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank’s valuation technique for estimating the fair values of its MBS first requires the establishment of a median vendor price for each security. If four vendor prices are received, the average of the middle two prices is the median price; if three prices are received, the middle price is the median price; if two prices are received, the average of the two prices is the median price; and if one price is received, it is the median price (and also the default fair value) subject to additional validation. All vendor prices that are within a specified tolerance threshold of the median price are included in the cluster of vendor prices that are averaged to establish a default fair value. All vendor prices that are outside the threshold (outliers) are subject to further analysis including, but not limited to, comparison to prices provided by an additional third-party valuation service, prices for similar securities and/or dealer estimates, or use of internal model prices, which are deemed to be reflective of all relevant facts and circumstances that a market participant would consider. Such analysis is also applied in those limited instances where no third-party vendor price or only one third-party vendor price is available in order to arrive at an estimated fair value. If an outlier (or some other price identified in the analysis) is determined to be a better estimate of fair value, then the outlier (or the other price, as appropriate) is used as the fair value rather than the default fair value. If, instead, the analysis confirms that an outlier is (or outliers are) not representative of fair value and the default fair value is the best estimate, then the default fair value is used as the fair value.

If all vendor prices received for a security are outside the tolerance threshold level of the median price, then there is no default fair value, and the fair value is determined by an evaluation of all outlier prices (or the other prices, as appropriate) as described above.

As of December 31, 20142017, fourmultiple vendor prices were received for most of the Bank’s MBS, and the fair value estimates for most of those securities were determined by averagingin accordance with the fourBank’s valuation technique based on these vendor prices. Based on the Bank’s reviews of the pricing methods employed by the third-party pricing vendors and the relative lack of dispersion among the vendor prices (or, in those instances in which there were outliers, or significant yield variances, the Bank’s additional analyses), the Bank believes that its fair value estimates are reasonable and that the fair value measurements are classified appropriately in the fair value hierarchy. Based on limited market liquidity for PLRMBS, the fair value measurements for these securities were classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.

As an additional step, the Bank reviewed the fair value estimates of its PLRMBS as of December 31, 2014, for reasonableness using a market-implied yield test. The Bank calculated a market-implied yield for each of its PLRMBS using the estimated fair value derived from the process described above and the security’s projected cash flows from the Bank’s OTTI process and compared the market-implied yield to the yields for comparable securities according to dealers and other third-party sources to the extent comparable market yield data was available. This analysis did not indicate that any adjustments to the fair value estimates were necessary.

Investment Securities FFCB Bonds and CalHFA Bonds The Bank estimates the fair values of these securities using the methodology described above for Investment Securities – MBS.

Advances Because quoted prices are not available for advances, the fair values are measured using model-based valuation techniques (such as calculating the present value of future cash flows and reducing the amount for accrued interest receivable).

The Bank’s primary inputs for measuring the fair value of advances are market-based consolidated obligation yield curve (CO Curve) inputs obtained from the Office of Finance. The CO Curve is then adjusted to reflect the rates on replacement advances with similar terms and collateral. These spread adjustments are not market-observable and are evaluated for significance in the overall fair value measurement and the fair value hierarchy level of the advance. The Bank obtains market-observable inputs from derivative dealers for complex advances. These inputs may include volatility assumptions, which are market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options (swaption volatility and volatility skew). The discount rates used in these calculations are the replacement advance rates for advances with similar terms. Pursuant to the Finance Agency’s advances regulation, advances with an original term to maturity or repricing period greater than six

174

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



months generally require a prepayment fee sufficient to make the Bank financially indifferent to the borrower’s decision to prepay the advances. The Bank determined that no adjustment is required to the fair value measurement of advances for prepayment fees. In addition, the Bank did not adjust its fair value measurement of advances for creditworthiness primarily because advances were fully collateralized.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio – The estimated fair value for seasoned mortgage loans represents modeled prices based on observable market prices for seasoned agency mortgage-backed passthrough securities adjusted for differences in coupon, average loan rate, credit, and cash flow remittance between the Bank’s mortgage loans and

172


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the referenced instruments, while the estimated fair value for newly originated mortgage loans represents modeled prices based on MPF commitment rates. Market prices are highly dependent on the underlying prepayment assumptions. Changes in the prepayment speeds often have a material effect on the fair value estimates. These underlying prepayment assumptions are susceptible to material changes in the near term because they are made at a specific point in time.

Loans to and from Other FHLBanks Because these are overnight transactions, the estimated fair value approximates the recorded carrying value.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable – The estimated fair value approximates the carrying value of accrued interest receivable and accrued interest payable.

Other Assets – The estimated fair value of grantor trust assets is based on quoted market prices.

Derivative Assets and Liabilities In general, derivative instruments transacted and held by the Bank for risk management activities are traded in over-the-counter markets where quoted market prices are not readily available. These derivatives are interest rate-related. For these derivatives, the Bank measures fair value using internally developed discounted cash flow models that use market-observable inputs, such as the overnight index swap (OIS) curve;curve and volatility assumptions, which are market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options (swaption volatility and volatility skew), adjusted for counterparty credit risk, as necessary; and prepayment assumptions.necessary.

The Bank is subject to credit risk because of the risk of potential nonperformance by its derivative counterparties. To mitigate this risk, the Bank executes uncleared derivative transactions only with highly rated derivative dealers and major banks (derivative dealer counterparties) that meet the Bank’s eligibility criteria. In addition, the Bank has entered into master netting agreements and bilateral securitycredit support agreements with all active derivative dealer counterparties that provide for delivery of collateral at specified levels to limit the Bank’s net unsecured credit exposure to these counterparties. Under these policies and agreements, the amount of unsecured credit exposure to an individual derivative dealer counterparty is either (i) limited to an absolute dollar credit exposure limit according to the counterparty’s long-term debt or deposit credit rating, as determined by rating agency long-term credit ratings of the counterparty’s debt securities or deposits,agencies or (ii) set at zero (subject to a minimum transfer amount). The Bank clears its cleared derivative transactions only through clearing agents that meet the Bank’s strict eligibility requirements, and the Bank’s credit exposure to the clearinghouse is secured by variation margin received from the clearinghouse. All credit exposure from derivative transactions entered into by the Bank with member counterparties that are not derivative dealers must be fully secured by eligible collateral. The Bank evaluated the potential for the fair value of the instruments to be affected by counterparty credit risk and determined that no adjustments to the overall fair value measurements were required.

The fair values of the derivative assets and liabilities include accrued interest receivable/payable and cash collateral remitted to/received from counterparties. The estimated fair values of the accrued interest receivable/payable and cash collateral approximate their carrying values because of their short-term nature. The fair values of derivatives that met the netting requirements are presented on a net basis. If these netted amounts are positive, they are classified as an asset and, if negative, they are classified as a liability.

Deposits The fair value of deposits is generally equal to the carrying value of the deposits because the deposits are primarily overnight deposits or due on demand. The Bank determines the fair values of term deposits by calculating

175

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



the present value of expected future cash flows from the deposits and reducing the amount for accrued interest payable. The discount rates used in these calculations are the cost of deposits with similar terms.

Consolidated Obligations Because quoted prices in active markets are not generally available for identical liabilities, the Bank measures fair values using internally developed models that use primarily market-observable inputs. The Bank’s primary inputsinput for measuring the fair value of consolidated obligation bonds areis a market-based CO Curve inputs obtained from the Office of Finance. The Office of Finance constructs the CO Curve using the Treasury

173


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



yield curve as a base curve, which may beis adjusted by indicative consolidated obligation spreads obtained from market-observable sources. These market indications are generally derived from pricing indications from dealers, historical pricing relationships, and market activity for similar liabilities, such as recent GSE tradesissuances or secondary market activity. For consolidated obligation bonds with embedded options, the Bank also obtains market-observable quotes and inputs, from derivative dealers. These inputs may includesuch as volatility assumptions, which are market-based expectations of future interest rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options (swaption volatility and volatility skew).

Adjustments may be necessary to reflect the Bank’s credit quality or the credit quality of the FHLBank System when valuing consolidated obligation bonds measured at fair value. The Bank monitors its own creditworthiness and the creditworthiness of the other FHLBanks and the FHLBank System to determine whether any adjustments are necessary for creditworthiness in its fair value measurement of consolidated obligation bonds. The credit ratings of the FHLBank System and any changes to the credit ratings are the basis for the Bank to determine whether the fair values of consolidated obligations have been significantly affected during the reporting period by changes in the instrument-specific credit risk.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock The estimated fair value of capital stock subject to mandatory redemption is generally at par value as indicated by contemporaneous purchases, redemptions, and repurchases at par value. Fair value includes estimated dividends earned at the time of reclassification from capital to liabilities, until such amount is paid, and any subsequently declared capital stock dividend. The Bank’s capital stock can only be acquired by members at par value and redeemed or repurchased at par value, subject to statutory and regulatory requirements. The Bank’s capital stock is not traded, and no market mechanism exists for the exchange of Bank capital stock outside the cooperative ownership structure.

Commitments – The estimated fair value of standby letters of credit is based on the present value of fees currently charged for similar agreements and is recorded in other liabilities. The estimated fair value of off-balance sheet fixed rate commitments to fund advances and commitments to issue consolidated obligations takes into account the difference between current and committed interest rates.

Subjectivity of Estimates Related to Fair Values of Financial Instruments. Estimates of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities using the methodologies described above are subjective and require judgments regarding significant matters, such as the amount and timing of future cash flows, prepayment speed assumptions, expected interest rate volatility, methods to determine possible distributions of future interest rates used to value options, and the selection of discount rates that appropriately reflect market and credit risks. Changes in these judgments often have a material effect on the fair value estimates.

Fair Value Measurements. The tables below present the fair value of assets and liabilities, which are recorded on a recurring or nonrecurring basis at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, by level within the fair value hierarchy.



176174


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



December 31, 2014         
December 31, 2017         
Fair Value Measurement Using: Netting
  Fair Value Measurement Using: Netting
  
Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Recurring fair value measurements – Assets:                  
Trading securities:                  
GSEs – FFCB bonds$
 $3,513
 $
 $
 $3,513
$
 $1,158
 $
 $
 $1,158
MBS:                  
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 11
 
 
 11

 6
 
 
 6
Total trading securities
 3,524
 
 
 3,524

 1,164
 
 
 1,164
AFS securities:                  
PLRMBS
 
 6,371
 
 6,371

 
 3,833
 
 3,833
Total AFS securities
 
 6,371
 
 6,371

 
 3,833
 
 3,833
Advances(2)

 5,137
 
 
 5,137

 6,431
 
 
 6,431
Derivative assets, net: interest rate-related
 455
 
 (396) 59

 174
 
 (91) 83
Other assets11
 
 
 
 11
9
 
 
 
 9
Total recurring fair value measurements – Assets$11
 $9,116
 $6,371
 $(396) $15,102
$9
 $7,769
 $3,833
 $(91) $11,520
Recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities:                  
Consolidated obligation bonds(3)
$
 $6,717
 $
 $
 $6,717
$
 $949
 $
 $
 $949
Derivative liabilities, net: interest rate-related
 233
 
 (213) 20

 85
 
 (84) 1
Total recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities$
 $6,950
 $
 $(213) $6,737
$
 $1,034
 $
 $(84) $950
Nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets:(4)                  
REO$
 $
 $1
   $1
Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio$
 $
 $3
 $
 $3
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets$
 $
 $3
 $
 $3

December 31, 2013         
December 31, 2016         
Fair Value Measurement Using: Netting
  Fair Value Measurement Using: Netting
  
Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Adjustments(1)

 Total
Recurring fair value measurements – Assets:                  
Trading securities:                  
GSEs – FFCB bonds$
 $3,194
 $
 $
 $3,194
$
 $2,058
 $
 $
 $2,058
MBS:                  
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 14
 
 
 14

 8
 
 
 8
Total trading securities
 3,208
 
 
 3,208

 2,066
 
 ��
 2,066
AFS securities:                  
PLRMBS
 
 7,047
 
 7,047

 
 4,489
 
 4,489
Total AFS securities
 
 7,047
 
 7,047

 
 4,489
 
 4,489
Advances(2)

 7,069
 
 
 7,069

 3,719
 
 
 3,719
Derivative assets, net: interest rate-related
 720
 
 (604) 116

 140
 
 (74) 66
Other assets10
 
 
 
 10
11
 
 
 
 11
Total recurring fair value measurements – Assets$10
 $10,997
 $7,047
 $(604) $17,450
$11
 $5,925
 $4,489
 $(74) $10,351
Recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities:                  
Consolidated obligation bonds(3)
$
 $10,115
 $
 $
 $10,115
$
 $1,507
 $
 $
 $1,507
Derivative liabilities, net: interest rate-related
 402
 
 (355) 47

 81
 
 (79) 2
Total recurring fair value measurements – Liabilities$
 $10,517
 $
 $(355) $10,162
$
 $1,588
 $
 $(79) $1,509
Nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets:(4)                  
REO$
 $
 $2
   $2
Impaired mortgage loans held for portfolio$
 $
 $5
 $
 $5
Total nonrecurring fair value measurements – Assets$
 $
 $5
 $
 $5

(1)Amounts represent the netting of derivative assets and liabilities by counterparty, including cash collateral, where the netting requirements have been met.

175


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



(2)
Represents advances recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.
(3)
Represents consolidated obligation bonds recorded under the fair value option at December 31, 20142017 and 2016.
(4)
The fair value information presented is as of the date the fair value adjustment was recorded during the years ended 2013December 31, 2017. and 2016.


177

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The following table presentstables present a reconciliation of the Bank’s AFS PLRMBS that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 2013,2016, and 2012.2015.

2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Balance, beginning of the period$7,047
 $7,604
 $7,687
$4,489
 $5,414
 $6,371
Total gain/(loss) realized and unrealized included in:          
Interest income66
 21
 (11)92
 102
 83
Net OTTI loss, credit-related(4) (7) (44)(16) (16) (15)
Unrealized gain/(loss) of other-than-temporarily impaired securities included in AOCI209
 644
 1,102
195
 103
 (29)
Net amount of OTTI loss reclassified to/(from) other income/(loss)(10) (3) 14
6
 (10) (15)
Settlements(937) (1,284) (1,284)(933) (1,104) (996)
Transfers of HTM securities to AFS securities
 72
 140

 
 15
Balance, end of the period$6,371
 $7,047
 $7,604
$3,833
 $4,489
 $5,414
Total amount of gain/(loss) for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains/losses relating to assets and liabilities still held at the end of the period$62
 $15
 $(55)$75
 $84
 $68

Fair Value Option. The fair value option provides an entity with an irrevocable option to elect fair value as an alternative measurement for selected financial assets, financial liabilities, unrecognized firm commitments, and written loan commitments not previously carried at fair value. It requires an entity to display the fair value of those assets and liabilities for which the entity has chosen to use fair value on the face of the Statements of Condition. Fair value is used for both the initial and subsequent measurement of the designated assets, liabilities, and commitments, with the changes in fair value recognized in net income. Interest income and interest expense on advances and consolidated bonds carried at fair value are recognized solely on the contractual amount of interest due or unpaid. Any transaction fees or costs are immediately recognized in non-interest income or non-interest expense.

The Bank elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments as follows:
Adjustable rate advances with embedded options (excluding call and put options)
Callable fixed rate advances
Putable fixed rate advances
Putable fixed rate advances with embedded options
Fixed rate advances with partial prepayment symmetry
Callable or non-callable capped floater consolidated obligation bonds
Convertible consolidated obligation bonds
Adjustable or fixed rate range accrual consolidated obligation bonds
Ratchet consolidated obligation bonds
Adjustable rate advances indexed to non-LIBOR indices such as the Prime Rate, U.S. Treasury bill, and Federal funds effective rate
Adjustable rate consolidated obligation bonds indexed to non-LIBOR indices such as the Prime Rate and U.S. Treasury bill and Federal funds effective rate
Step-up callable bonds, which pay interest at increasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank's option on the step-up dates
Step-down callable bonds, which pay interest at decreasing fixed rates for specified intervals over the life of the bond and can generally be called at the Bank's option on the step-down dates


176


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The Bank has elected the fair value option for certain financial instruments to assist in mitigating potential earnings volatility that can arise from economic hedging relationships in which the carrying value of the hedged item is not

178

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



adjusted for changes in fair value. The potential earnings volatility associated with using fair value only for the derivative is the Bank’s primary reason for electing the fair value option for financial assets and liabilities that do not qualify for hedge accounting or that have not previously met or may be at risk for not meeting the hedge effectiveness requirements.

The following table summarizestables summarize the activity related to financial assets and liabilities for which the Bank elected the fair value option during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012:

2015:
2014 2013 20122017 2016 2015
Advances
 
Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

 Advances
 
Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

 Advances
 Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

Advances
 
Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

 Advances
 
Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

 Advances
 Consolidated
Obligation Bonds

Balance, beginning of the period$7,069
 $10,115
 $7,390
 $27,884
 $8,684
 $15,712
$3,719
 $1,507
 $3,677
 $4,233
 $5,137
 $6,717
New transactions elected for fair value option783
 3,607
 837
 3,547
 862
 25,925
3,657
 1,185
 947
 685
 1,018
 2,585
Maturities and terminations(2,700) (7,088) (988) (21,165) (2,127) (13,745)(918) (1,745) (878) (3,420) (2,442) (5,083)
Net gain/(loss) on advances and net (gain)/loss on consolidated obligation bonds held under fair value option(11) 82
 (169) (146) (22) (7)(31) 
 (27) 13
 (31) 19
Change in accrued interest(4) 1
 (1) (5) (7) (1)4
 2
 
 (4) (5) (5)
Balance, end of the period$5,137
 $6,717
 $7,069
 $10,115
 $7,390
 $27,884
$6,431
 $949
 $3,719
 $1,507
 $3,677
 $4,233

For instruments for which the fair value option has been elected, the related contractual interest income and contractual interest expense are recorded as part of net interest income on the Statements of Income. The remaining changes in fair value for instruments for which the fair value option has been elected are recorded as net gains/ (losses) on financial instruments held under the fair value option in the Statements of Income. The change in fair value does not include changes in instrument-specific credit risk. For advances and consolidated obligations recorded under the fair value option, the Bank determined that no adjustments to the fair values of these instruments for instrument-specific credit risk were necessary for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012.2015.

The following table presents the difference between the aggregate remaining contractual principal balance outstanding and aggregate fair value of advances and consolidated obligation bonds for which the Bank elected the fair value option at December 31, 20142017 and 20132016:

At December 31, 2014 At December 31, 20132017 2016
Principal Balance
 Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance

 Principal Balance
 Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance

Principal Balance
 Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance

 Principal Balance
 Fair Value
 
Fair Value
Over/(Under)
Principal Balance

Advances(1)
$5,048
 $5,137
 $89
 $6,956
 $7,069
 $113
$6,447
 $6,431
 $(16) $3,709
 $3,719
 $10
Consolidated obligation bonds6,748
 6,717
 (31) 10,230
 10,115
 (115)955
 949
 (6) 1,515
 1,507
 (8)

(1)
At December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, none of these advances were 90 days or more past due or had been placed on nonaccrual status.

Note 20 — Commitments and Contingencies

As provided by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks, all FHLBanks have joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, which are backed only by the financial resources of the FHLBanks. The joint and several liability regulation authorizes the Finance Agency to require any FHLBank to repay all or a portion of the principal or interest on consolidated obligations for which another FHLBank is the primary obligor. The regulations provide a general framework for addressing the possibility that an FHLBank may be unable to repay the consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. The Bank has never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another

179177


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



never been asked or required to repay the principal or interest on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, and as of December 31, 20142017, and through the filing date of this report, does not believe that it is probable that it will be asked to do so.

The Bank determined that it was not necessary to recognize a liability for the fair value of the Bank's joint and several liability for all consolidated obligations. The joint and several obligations are mandated by the FHLBank Act or regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks and are not the result of arms-length transactions among the FHLBanks. The FHLBanks have no control over the amount of the guarantee or the determination of how each FHLBank would perform under the joint and several obligations. Because the FHLBanks are subject to the authority of the Finance Agency as it relates to decisions involving the allocation of the joint and several liability for the FHLBanks' consolidated obligations, the FHLBanks' joint and several obligations are excluded from the initial recognition and measurement provisions. Accordingly, the Bank has not recognized a liability for its joint and several obligation related to other FHLBanks' participations in the consolidated obligations. The par value of the outstanding consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks was $847,175$1,034,260 at December 31, 20142017, and $766,837$989,311 at December 31, 20132016. The par value of the Bank’s participation in consolidated obligations was $68,538115,602 at December 31, 20142017, and $76,96883,749 at December 31, 20132016.

The joint and several liability regulation provides a general framework for addressing the possibility that an FHLBank may be unable to repay its participation in the consolidated obligations for which it is the primary obligor. In accordance with this regulation, the president of each FHLBank is required to provide a quarterly certification that, among other things, the FHLBank will remain capable of making full and timely payment of all its current obligations, including direct obligations.

In addition, the regulation requires that an FHLBank must provide written notice to the Finance Agency if at any time the FHLBank is unable to provide the quarterly certification; projects that it will be unable to fully meet all of its current obligations, including direct obligations, on a timely basis during the quarter; or negotiates or enters into an agreement with another FHLBank for financial assistance to meet its obligations. If an FHLBank gives any one of these notices (other than in a case of a temporary interruption in the FHLBank's debt servicing operations resulting from an external event such as a natural disaster or a power failure), it must promptly file a consolidated obligations payment plan for Finance Agency approval specifying the measures the FHLBank will undertake to make full and timely payments of all its current obligations.

Notwithstanding any other provisions in the regulation, the regulation provides that the Finance Agency in its discretion may at any time order any FHLBank to make any principal or interest payment due on any consolidated obligation. To the extent an FHLBank makes any payment on any consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, the paying FHLBank is entitled to reimbursement from the FHLBank that is the primary obligor, which will have a corresponding obligation to reimburse the FHLBank for the payment and associated costs, including interest.

The regulation also provides that the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liability of an FHLBank for consolidated obligations among the other FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank's participation in all consolidated obligations outstanding. The Finance Agency reserves the right to allocate the outstanding liabilities for the consolidated obligations among the FHLBanksor in any other manner it may determine to ensure that the FHLBanks operate in a safe and sound manner.

Off-balance sheet commitments as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016, were as follows:


180

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



2014 20132017 2016
Expire Within
One Year

 
Expire After
One Year

 Total
 
Expire Within
One Year

 
Expire After
One Year

 Total
Expire Within
One Year

 
Expire After
One Year

 Total
 
Expire Within
One Year

 
Expire After
One Year

 Total
Standby letters of credit outstanding$2,699
 $2,711
 $5,410
 $1,031
 $2,572
 $3,603
$12,910
 $3,240
 $16,150
 $11,094
 $4,066
 $15,160
Commitments to fund advances(1)
121
 5
 126
 4
 4
 8
Commitments to fund additional advances1
 
 1
 5
 1
 6
Commitments to issue consolidated obligation discount notes, par3
 
 3
 
 
 
134
 
 134
 846
 
 846
Commitments to issue consolidated obligation bonds, par(2)

 
 
 1,640
 
 1,640
595
 
 595
 655
 
 655
Commitments to purchase mortgage loans16
 
 16
 13
 
 13

(1)At December 31, 2014, $100 of the commitments to fund additional advances were hedged with associated interest rate swaps. At December 31, 2013, none of the commitments to fund additional advances were hedged with associated interest rate swaps.
(2)
At December 31, 2013, $1,640 of the unsettled consolidated obligation bonds were hedged with associated interest rate swaps.

Standby letters of credit are generally issued for a fee on behalf of members to support their obligations to third parties. If the Bank is required to make a payment for a beneficiary’s drawing under a letter of credit, the amount is immediately due and payable by the member to the Bank and is charged to the member’s demand deposit account with the Bank. The original terms of these standby letters of credit range from 9014 days to 1015 years, including a final expiration in 2024.2032. The Bank monitors the creditworthiness of members that have standby letters of credit. In addition, standby letters of credit are fully collateralized. As a result, the Bank determined that it was not necessary to record any allowance for losses on these commitments at December 31, 2014, and December 31, 2013.The

178


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



The value of the Bank’s obligations related to standby letters of credit is recorded in other liabilities and amounted to $1219 at December 31, 20142017, and $12$24 at December 31, 20132016. LettersStandby letters of credit are fully collateralized at the time of issuance. Based on the Bank’s credit analyses of members’ financial condition and collateral requirements, the Bank deemed it unnecessary to record any additional liability on the letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

Commitments to fund advances totaled $1261 at December 31, 20142017, and $86 at December 31, 20132016. Advances funded under advance commitments are fully collateralized at the time of funding (see Note 10 – Allowance for Credit Losses). Based on the Bank’s credit analyses of members’ financial condition and collateral requirements, the Bank deemed it unnecessary to record any additional liability on the advance commitments outstanding as of December 31, 20142017 and 20132016.

The Bank may enter into commitments that unconditionally obligate it to purchase mortgage loans from its members. Commitments are generally for periods not exceeding 60 days. Delivery commitments are recorded at fair value as derivative assets or derivative liabilities in the Statements of Condition.

The Bank executes over-the-counter uncleared interest rate exchange agreements with major banks and derivative entities affiliated with broker-dealers and has executed uncleared interest rate exchange agreements in the past with itsthe Bank’s members. The Bank enters into master agreements with netting provisions and into bilateral securitycredit support agreements with all active derivative dealer counterparties. All member counterparty master agreements, excluding those with derivative dealers, are subject to the terms of the Bank’s Advances and Security Agreement with members, and all member counterparties (except for those that are derivative dealers) must fully collateralize the Bank’s net credit exposure. For cleared derivatives, the clearinghouse is the Bank’s counterparty, and the Bank has clearing agreements with clearing agents that provide for delivery of initial margin to, and exchange of variation margin with, the clearinghouse. See Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities for additional information about the Bank’s pledged collateral and other credit-risk-related contingent features. As of December 31, 2014, the Bank had pledged total collateral of $502, including securities with a de minimis carrying value, all of which may be sold or repledged, and cash collateral of $502 to counterparties and the clearing house that had market risk exposure to the Bank related to derivatives. As of December 31, 2013, the Bank had pledged cash collateral of $149 to counterparties and the clearing house that had market risk exposure to the Bank related to derivatives.

The Bank charged operating expenses for net rental and related costs of approximately $5, $5,$7, $6, and $5 for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 2012,2015, respectively. Future minimum rentals at December 31, 20142017, were as follows:

181

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Year
Future Minimum
Rentals

Equipment Capital Leases
 Premises Operating Leases
2015$4
20164
20174
20184
$2
 $5
20193
2
 4
Thereafter2
20202
 2
20212
 
20221
 
Total$21
$9
 $11

Lease agreements for Bank premises generally provide for increases in the basic rentals resulting from increases in property taxes and maintenance expenses. Such increases are not expected to have a material effect on the Bank's financial condition or results of operations.

The Bank may be subject to various pending legal proceedings that may arise in the ordinary course of business. After consultation with legal counsel, the Bank does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these matters will have a material effect on its financial condition or results of operations.

Other commitments and contingencies are discussed in Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 8 – Advances, Note 9 – Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio, Note 12 – Consolidated Obligations, Note 13 –

179


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Affordable Housing Program, Note 15 – Capital, Note 16 – Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans, and Note 18 – Derivatives and Hedging Activities.

Note 21 — Transactions with Certain Members, Certain Nonmembers, and Other FHLBanks

Transactions with Members. Members and Nonmembers.The Bank has a cooperative ownership structure under which current member institutions, certain former members, and certain other nonmembers own the capital stock of the Bank. Former members and nonmembers that have outstanding transactions with the Bank are required to maintain their investment in the Bank's capital stock until their outstanding transactions mature or are paid off or until their capital stock is redeemed following the five-year redemption period for capital stock or is repurchased by the Bank, in accordance with the Bank's capital requirements (seerequirements. (For further information on concentration risk, see Note 15 – Capital and Note 8 – Advances).

Under the FHLBank Act and Finance Agency regulations, each member eligible to vote is entitled to cast by ballot one vote for further information).each share of stock that it was required to hold as of the record date, which is December 31, of the year prior to each election, subject to the limitation that no member may cast more votes than the average number of shares of the Bank’s stock that are required to be held by all members located in such member's state. As of and for the three-year period ending December 31, 2017, no shareholder owned 10% or more of the total voting interests in the Bank because of this statutory limit on members' voting rights.

All advances are made to members, and all mortgage loans held for portfolio were purchased from members. The Bank also maintains deposit accounts for members, certain former members, and certain other nonmembers primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are directly related to advances and mortgage loan purchases. All transactions with members and their affiliates are entered into in the ordinary course of business. In instances where the member has an officer or director who is a director of the Bank, transactions with the member are subject to the same eligibility and credit criteria, as well as the same conditions, as comparable transactions with all other members, in accordance with regulations governing the operations of the FHLBanks.

The Bank has investmentsmay invest in Federal funds sold, interest-bearing deposits, and commercial paper, and executes MBS and derivativesexecutes derivative transactions with members or their affiliates. The Bank purchases MBS through securities brokers or dealers and executes all MBS investments without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the investment as a nonmember, member, or affiliate of a member. When the Bank executes non-MBS investments with a member, the Bank may give consideration to the member’s secured credit and the Bank's advances pricing. As an additional service to its members, the Bank has in the past entered into offsetting interest rate exchange agreements, acting as an intermediary between exactly offsetting derivativesderivative transactions with members and other counterparties. These transactions arewere executed at market rates.


182

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Transactions with Certain Members and Certain Nonmembers. The following tables set forth information at the dates and for the periods indicated with respect to transactions with: (i) members and nonmembers that held more than 10% of the outstanding shares of the Bank’s capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, at any time during the periods indicated, (ii) members that had an officer or director serving on the Bank’s Board of Directors at any time during the periods indicated, and (iii) affiliates of the foregoing members and nonmembers. All transactions with members, the nonmembers described above, and their respective affiliates are entered into in the ordinary course of business. The tables include securities transactions where the foregoing members, nonmembers, and their affiliates (as described above) are the issuers or obligors of the securities, but do not include securities purchased, sold or issued through, or otherwise underwritten by, affiliates of the foregoing members and nonmembers. The tables also do not include any AHP or Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) grants. Securities purchased, sold or issued through, or otherwise underwritten by, and AHP or CICA grants provided to, the affiliates of foregoing members and nonmembers are in the ordinary course of the Bank’s business.

  
December 31, 2014
 December 31, 2013
Assets:   
Investments(1)
$139
 $1,176
Advances5,081
 11,268
Mortgage loans held for portfolio33
 760
Accrued interest receivable6
 25
Other assets18
 37
Derivative assets, net
 257
Total Assets$5,277
 $13,523
Liabilities:   
Deposits$3
 $260
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock577
 1,356
Derivative liabilities, net18
 37
Total Liabilities$598
 $1,653
Notional amount of derivatives$2,858
 $12,256
Standby letters of credit21
 205

(1)
Investments consist of securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, AFS securities, and HTM securities issued by and/or purchased from the members or nonmembers described in this section or their affiliates.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2014
 2013
 2012
Interest Income:     
Investments(1)
$22
 $30
 $38
Advances(2) 
55
 134
 174
Mortgage loans held for portfolio11
 44
 63
Total Interest Income$88
 $208
 $275
Interest Expense:     
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock$74
 $138
 $45
Consolidated obligations(2)
(42) (166) (217)
Total Interest Expense$32
 $(28) $(172)
Other Income/(Loss):     
Net gain/(loss) on derivatives and hedging activities$(288) $(118) $(159)
Other
 
 1
Total Other Income/(Loss)$(288) $(118) $(158)


183

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



(1)
Investments consist of securities purchased under agreements to resell, Federal funds sold, AFS securities, and HTM securities issued by and/or purchased from the members or nonmembers described in this section or their affiliates.
(2)Reflects the effect of associated derivatives with the members or nonmembers described in this section or their affiliates.

The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to establish an AHP. The Bank provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances. Only Bank members, along with their nonmember AHP project sponsors, may submit AHP applications. All AHP subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

The FHLBank Act also requires the Bank to establish a Community Investment Program (CIP) and authorizes the Bank to offer additional CICACommunity Investment Cash Advance (CICA) programs. Under these programs, the Bank provides subsidies in the form of grants and below-market interest rate advances to members or standby letters of credit for members for community lending and economic development projects. Only Bank members may submit applications for CICA subsidies. All CICA subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

In instances where an AHP or CICA transaction involves athe member that owns more than 10% of the Bank's capital stock (or an affiliate of such a member), a member withhas an officer or director who is a directorserving on the Bank’s Board of Directors, all of the Bank, or an entityaforementioned transactions with an officer, director, or general partner who serves as a director of the Bank (and that has a direct or indirect interest in the subsidy), the transaction is in the ordinary course of business and ismember are subject to the same eligibility and other programcredit criteria, and requirements as well as the same conditions, as comparable transactions with all other comparable transactions and to themembers, in accordance with regulations governing the operations of the relevant program.FHLBanks. The following tables set forth information at the dates and for the periods indicated with respect to transactions with members that have an officer or director serving on the Bank’s Board of Directors.

180


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



  
December 31, 2017
 December 31, 2016
Assets:   
Advances$3,072
 $3,756
Mortgage loans held for portfolio13
 17
Accrued interest receivable5
 4
Liabilities:   
Deposits$3
 $3
Capital:   
Capital Stock$126
 $129

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017
 2016
 2015
Interest Income:     
Advances$41
 $35
 $35
Mortgage loans held for portfolio1
 1
 1

Transactions with Other FHLBanks. TransactionsThe Bank may occasionally enter into transactions with other FHLBanks. These transactions are summarized below.

Deposits with other FHLBanks. The Bank may, from time to time, maintain deposits with other FHLBanks. Deposits with other FHLBanks totaled de minimis amounts at December 31, 2017 and 2016, which were recorded in the Statements of Condition in the Cash and due from banks line item.

Overnight Funds. The Bank may borrow or lend unsecured overnight funds from or to other FHLBanks. All such transactions are at current market rates. Interest income and interest expense related to these transactions with other FHLBanks are included in other interest income and interest expense from other borrowings in the Statements of Income. Balances outstanding at period end with other FHLBanks, if any, are identified on the face ofin the Bank’s financial statements. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Bank extended overnight loans to other FHLBanks for $1,505, $505, and $1,805 respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015, the Bank borrowed $240, $2,490, and $4,812 respectively, from other FHLBanks. The impact to net interest income related to these transactions was de minimis in any period in this report.

MPF Mortgage Loans. The Bank pays a transaction services fee to the FHLBank of Chicago for its participation in the MPF program. This fee is assessed monthly and is based on the amount of mortgage loans in which the Bank invested and which remain outstanding on its Statements of Condition. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Bank recorded $1 and $1, respectively, in MPF transaction services fee expense to the FHLBank of Chicago, which was recorded in the Statements of Income as other expense. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bank recorded de minimis amounts in MPF transaction services fee expense to the FHLBank of Chicago.

In addition, the Bank receives a counterparty fee from the FHLBank of Chicago for facilitating the sale of loans under the MPF program. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Bank recorded a de minimis amount in MPF counterparty fee income from the FHLBank of Chicago, which was recorded in the Statements of Income as other income. For the year ended December 31, 2015, the Bank had no MPF counterparty fee income from the FHLBank of Chicago.

Consolidated Obligations. The Bank may, from time to time, transfer to or assume from another FHLBank the outstanding primary liability for FHLBank consolidated obligations. During the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Bank did not transfer any debt to other FHLBanks or assume any debt from other FHLBanks.


181


Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



Transactions with the Office of Finance. The Bank’s proportionate share of the cost of operating the Office of Finance is identified in the Statements of Income.

Note 22 — Other

The table below discloses the categories included in other operating expense for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 2012.2015.

2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Professional and contract services$48
 $33
 $31
$39
 $47
 $50
Travel2
 2
 2
2
 2
 2
Occupancy5
 5
 5
7
 6
 5
Equipment10
 9
 10
16
 13
 10
Other4
 4
 4
6
 6
 4
Total$69
 $53
 $52
$70
 $74
 $71

Note 23 — Subsequent Events

In January 2015, the Bank entered into settlement agreements with certain defendants in connection with the Bank’s PLRMBS litigation for the aggregate amount of $459 (after netting certain legal fees and expenses) and, with respect to certain claims, an additional amount to be received by the Bank in the future. The $459 will be recognized in the Bank’s financial statements for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

The Bank amended its capital plan, effective April 1, 2015, to lower the cap on the membership stock requirement to $15 from $25, lower the activity-based stock requirement to 3.0% from 4.7% for outstanding advances and to 3.0% from 5.0% for mortgage loans purchased and held by the Bank, and change the authorized ranges for the activity-based stock requirement.


184

Table of Contents
Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco
Notes to Financial Statements (continued)



There were no other material subsequent events identified, subsequent to December 31, 2014,2017, until the time of the Form 10-K filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission.



185182


Table of Contents

Supplementary Financial Data (Unaudited)

Supplementary financial data for each full quarter in the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, are included in the following tables (dollars in millions except per share amounts).

Three Months EndedThree Months Ended
December 31,
2014

 
September 30,
2014

 
June 30,
2014

 
March 31,
2014

December 31, 2017
 September 30, 2017
 
June 30,
 2017

 
March 31,
2017

Interest income$237
 $247
 $260
 $261
$485
 $434
 $366
 $315
Interest expense104
 114
 122
 126
342
 288
 222
 181
Net interest income133
 133
 138
 135
143
 146
 144
 134
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans
 (1) 
 1

 
 
 
Other income/(loss)(40) (12) (54) (48)(14) (4) (16) 112
Other expense41
 34
 37
 32
54
 51
 39
 80
Assessments7
 12
 8
 9
8
 10
 9
 18
Net income/(loss)$45
 $76
 $39
 $45
$67
 $81
 $80
 $148
Dividends declared per share$1.87
 $1.83
 $1.68
 $1.68
$1.76
 $1.75
 $1.73
 $2.28
Annualized dividend rate7.40% 7.35% 6.80% 6.67%7.00% 7.00% 7.00% 9.08%



Three Months EndedThree Months Ended
December 31, 2013
 
September 30,
2013

 
June 30,
2013

 
March 31,
2013

December 31, 2016
 September 30, 2016
 
June 30,
 2016

 
March 31,
2016

Interest income$269
 $267
 $271
 $279
$283
 $274
 $265
 $256
Interest expense142
 153
 157
 152
175
 151
 148
 133
Net interest income127
 114
 114
 127
108
 123
 117
 123
Provision for/(reversal of) credit losses on mortgage loans(1) 
 
 

 
 
 
Other income/(loss)(5) (22) 36
 (4)82
 241
 (9) 171
Other expense35
 32
 31
 30
46
 39
 37
 36
Assessments14
 11
 15
 12
17
 34
 8
 27
Net income/(loss)74
 $49
 $104
 $81
$127
 $291
 $63
 $231
Dividends declared per share(1)$1.42
 $1.28
 $0.83
 $0.58
$5.66
 $2.28
 $2.21
 $2.01
Annualized dividend rate(1)5.65% 5.14% 3.38% 2.30%22.51% 9.17% 8.90% 7.99%

(1)In the fourth quarter of 2016, the amount of dividends declared per share includes a special dividend of $3.41 at an annualized dividend rate of 13.57%.


186183


Table of Contents

Investments

Supplementary financial data on the carrying values of the Bank’s investments as of December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 2012,2015, are included in the tables below.

(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
Trading securities:          
U.S. government corporations and GSEs – FFCB bonds$3,513
 $3,194
 $3,175
$1,158
 $2,058
 $1,424
MBS:
    
    
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae11
 14
 16
6
 8
 9
Total trading securities3,524
 3,208
 3,191
1,164
 2,066
 1,433
AFS securities:

    

    
MBS:
    
    
PLRMBS6,371
 7,047
 7,604
3,833
 4,489
 5,414
Total AFS securities6,371
 7,047
 7,604
3,833
 4,489
 5,414
HTM securities:
    
    
Certificates of deposits
 1,660
 1,739
500
 1,350
 
States and political subdivisions:
    
    
Housing finance agency bonds – CalHFA bonds328
 416
 535
187
 225
 275
U.S. government corporations and GSEs:
    
    
MBS:
    
    
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae1,513
 1,575
 340
751
 951
 1,227
GSEs:
    
    
Freddie Mac4,517
 5,250
 4,828
6,690
 4,349
 3,677
Fannie Mae5,313
 6,331
 7,020
5,731
 6,095
 4,136
PLRMBS1,880
 2,275
 2,914
821
 1,157
 1,487
Total HTM securities13,551
 17,507
 17,376
14,680
 14,127
 10,802
Total securities23,446
 27,762
 28,171
19,677
 20,682
 17,649
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,000
 
 1,500
11,750
 15,500
 10,000
Federal funds sold7,503
 7,498
 10,857
11,028
 4,214
 4,626
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 590
 
Total investments$31,949
 $35,260
 $40,528
$43,570
 $40,986
 $32,275
















187184


Table of Contents

As of December 31, 2014,2017, the Bank’s investments had the following maturity (based on contractual final principal payment) and yield characteristics.
(Dollars in millions)Within One Year
 
After One Year But
Within Five Years

 
After Five Years But
Within Ten Years

 After Ten Years
 Carrying Value
Trading securities:         
U.S. government corporations and GSEs – FFCB bonds$500
 $658
 $
 $
 $1,158
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 1
 5
 
 6
Total trading securities500
 659

5



1,164
Yield on trading securities1.45% 1.61% 2.52% % 1.55%
AFS securities:         
MBS:         
PLRMBS
 
 
 3,833
 3,833
Total AFS securities
 
 
 3,833
 3,833
Yield on AFS securities% % % 6.54% 6.54%
HTM securities:         
Certificates of deposits500
 
 
 
 500
States and political subdivisions:         
Housing finance agency bonds – CalHFA bonds
 
 12
 175
 187
U.S. government corporations and GSEs:         
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – single-family – Ginnie Mae
 
 
 751
 751
GSEs single-family:         
Freddie Mac
 1
 3
 2,035
 2,039
Fannie Mae
 2
 6
 3,592
 3,600
Subtotal GSEs single-family
 3
 9
 5,627
 5,639
GSEs multifamily:         
Freddie Mac
 
 4,651
 
 4,651
Fannie Mae
 
 2,131
 
 2,131
Subtotal GSEs multifamily
 
 6,782
 
 6,782
PLRMBS
 
 10
 811
 821
Total HTM securities500

3

6,813

7,364
 14,680
Yield on HTM securities1.49% 5.79% 1.79% 2.52% 2.15%
Total securities1,000

662

6,818

11,197

19,677
Yield on total securities1.47% 1.63% 1.79% 3.81% 2.90%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,750
 
 
 
 11,750
Federal funds sold11,028
 
 
 
 11,028
Interest-bearing deposits1,115
 
 
 
 1,115
Total investments$24,893

$662

$6,818

$11,197

$43,570



(Dollars in millions)Within One Year
 
After One Year But
Within Five Years

 
After Five Years But
Within Ten Years

 After Ten Years
 Carrying Value
Trading securities:         
U.S. government corporations and GSEs – FFCB bonds$2,338
 $1,175
 $
 $
 $3,513
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 
 4
 7
 11
Total trading securities2,338
 1,175

4

7

3,524
Yield on trading securities0.18% 0.19% 1.64% 1.71% 0.19%
AFS securities:         
MBS:         
PLRMBS
 
 
 6,371
 6,371
Total AFS securities
 
 
 6,371
 6,371
Yield on AFS securities% % % 4.54% 4.54%
HTM securities:         
States and political subdivisions:         
Housing finance agency bonds – CalHFA bonds
 
 78
 250
 328
U.S. government corporations and GSEs:         
MBS:         
Other U.S. obligations – Ginnie Mae
 
 1
 1,512
 1,513
GSEs:         
Freddie Mac
 4
 7
 4,506
 4,517
Fannie Mae
 15
 73
 5,225
 5,313
PLRMBS
 1
 
 1,879
 1,880
Total HTM securities
 20
 159
 13,372
 13,551
Yield on HTM securities% 4.85% 2.49% 2.43% 2.43%
Total securities2,338

1,195

163

19,750

23,446
Yield on total securities0.18% 0.27% 2.47% 3.10% 2.66%
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,000
 
 
 
 1,000
Federal funds sold7,503
 
 
 
 7,503
Total investments$10,841

$1,195

$163

$19,750

$31,949
185


188

Table of Contents

Mortgage Loan Data

The unpaid principal balances of delinquent mortgage loans for the past five years were as follows:

(Dollars in millions)2014
 2013
 2012
 2011
 2010
2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
30 - 59 days delinquent$12
 $14
 $18
 $24
 $26
$8
 $7
 $10
 $12
 $14
60 - 89 days delinquent5
 7
 7
 9
 8
2
 3
 5
 5
 7
90 days or more delinquent22
 27
 32
 31
 29
12
 15
 18
 22
 27
Total past due39
 48
 57
 64
 63
22
 25
 33
 39
 48
Total current loans674
 865
 1,239
 1,777
 2,337
1,983
 789
 620
 674
 865
Total mortgage loans$713
 $913
 $1,296
 $1,841
 $2,400
$2,005
 $814
 $653
 $713
 $913
In process of foreclosure, included above(1)
$11
 $15
 $19
 $20
 $17
$3
 $5
 $7
 $11
 $15
Nonaccrual loans$22
 $27
 $32
 $31
 $29
$12
 $15
 $18
 $22
 $27
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$
 $
 $
 $
 $
$
 $
 $
 $
 $
Delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding5.47% 5.26% 4.40% 3.48% 2.61%1.11% 3.12% 5.05% 5.47% 5.26%
Serious delinquencies as a percentage of total mortgage loans outstanding(2)
3.13% 3.00% 2.46% 1.70% 1.19%0.61% 1.83% 2.79% 3.13% 3.00%

(1)
Includes loans for which the servicer has reported a decision to foreclose or to pursue a similar alternative, such as deed-in-lieu. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due or current loans depending on their delinquency status.
(2)
Represents loans that are 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure. The ratio increased primarily becauseforeclosure as a percentage of the decline in the unpaid principal balance of the Bank’stotal mortgage loans.
loans outstanding.

The allowance for credit losses on the mortgage loan portfolio was as follows:

(Dollars in millions)2014
 2013
 2012
 2011
 2010
2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Balance, beginning of the period$2
 $3
 $6
 $3
 $2
$
 $
 $1
 $2
 $3
(Charge-offs)/recoveries(1) 
 (2) (1) (1)
 
 (2) (1) 
Provision for/(recovery of) credit losses
 (1) (1) 4
 2

 
 1
 
 (1)
Balance, end of the period$1
 $2
 $3
 $6
 $3
$
 $
 $
 $1
 $2
Ratio of net charge-offs during the period to average loans outstanding during the period(0.05)% (0.07)% (0.08)% (0.07)% (0.05)%% (0.03)% (0.24)% (0.05)% (0.07)%

For the past five years, the interest on nonaccrual loans that was contractually due and recognized in income was as follows:

Interest on Nonaccrual Loans
                  
(In millions)2014
 2013
 2012
 2011
 2010
2017
 2016
 2015
 2014
 2013
Interest contractually due on nonaccrual loans during the period$1
 $1
 $2
 $2
 $1
$1
 $1
 $1
 $1
 $1
Interest recognized in income for nonaccrual loans during the period
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
Shortfall$1
 $1
 $2
 $2
 $1
$1
 $1
 $1
 $1
 $1

189186


Table of Contents

Geographic Concentration of Mortgage Loans(1) 

December 31, 2014
 December 31, 2013
December 31, 2017
 December 31, 2016
California36.09% 37.13%86.39% 66.07%
Arizona1.52
 2.80
New York1.33
 4.19
Illinois7.78
 7.38
1.16
 3.68
New York7.77
 7.59
Massachusetts4.68
 4.61
New Jersey4.28
 4.09
Texas1.07
 1.18
All others(2)
39.40
 39.20
8.53
 22.08
Total100.00% 100.00%100.00% 100.00%

(1)Percentages calculated based on the unpaid principal balance at the end of each period.
(2)None of the remaining states represented more than 3.74%0.78% and 3.88%2.34% of the portfolio at December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, respectively.

Short-Term Borrowings

Borrowings with original maturities of one year or less are classified as short-term. The following is a summary of short-term borrowings for the years ended December 31, 20142017, 20132016, and 2012:2015:

Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes 
Consolidated Obligation Bonds With Original
Maturities of One Year or Less
Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes 
Consolidated Obligation Bonds With Original
Maturities of One Year or Less
(Dollars in millions)2014

2013

2012
 2014
 2013
 2012
2017
 2016
 2015
 2017
 2016
 2015
Outstanding at end of the period$21,811
 $24,194
 $5,209
 $11,700
 $14,700
 $14,770
$30,440
 $33,506
 $27,647
 $46,047
 $19,190
 $18,273
Weighted average rate at end of the period0.09% 0.10% 0.15% 0.13% 0.14% 0.19%1.24% 0.46% 0.25% 1.23% 0.67% 0.25%
Daily average outstanding for the period$23,582
 $16,325
 $16,184
 $16,841
 $11,697
 $13,175
$33,657
 $33,504
 $28,853
 $25,927
 $18,536
 $11,085
Weighted average rate for the period0.09% 0.10% 0.13% 0.13% 0.15% 0.19%0.85% 0.41% 0.16% 0.94% 0.53% 0.17%
Highest outstanding at any monthend$25,640
 $24,194
 $23,664
 $22,345
 $14,980
 $15,285
$38,632
 $42,244
 $33,859
 $46,047
 $22,913
 $18,273


190

Table of Contents

ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Disclosure Controls and Procedures

The senior management of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) is responsible for establishing and maintaining a system of disclosure controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (1934 Act) is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Bank in the reports that it files or submits under the 1934 Act is accumulated and communicated to the Bank’s management, including its principal executive officer or officers and principal financial officer or officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures, the Bank’s management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and the Bank’s management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of controls and procedures.


187


Table of Contents

Management of the Bank has evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures with the participation of the president and chief executive officer, executive vice president and chief operating officer and senior vice president and chief financial officer as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on that evaluation, the Bank’s president and chief executive officer, executive vice president and chief operating officer and senior vice president and chief financial officer have concluded that the Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the 1934 Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the Bank's principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Bank's Board of Directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (U.S. GAAP) and includes those policies and procedures that:
pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of assets of the Bank;
provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures of the Bank are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the Bank; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

During the three months ended December 31, 2014,2017, there were no changes in the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting. For management’s assessment of the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting, refer to “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data – Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.”


191

Table of Contents

Consolidated Obligations

The Bank’s disclosure controls and procedures include controls and procedures for accumulating and communicating information in compliance with the Bank’s disclosure and financial reporting requirements relating to the joint and several liability for the consolidated obligations of the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks). Because the FHLBanks are independently managed and operated, the Bank’s management relies on information that is provided or disseminated by the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency), the Office of Finance, and the other FHLBanks, as well as on published FHLBank credit ratings, in determining whether the joint and several liability regulation is reasonably likely to result in a direct obligation for the Bank or whether it is reasonably possible that the Bank will accrue a direct liability.

The Bank’s management also relies on the operation of the joint and several liability regulation. The joint and several liability regulation requires that each FHLBank file with the Finance Agency a quarterly certification that it will remain capable of making full and timely payment of all of its current obligations, including direct obligations, coming due during the next quarter. In addition, if an FHLBank cannot make such a certification or if it projects that it may be unable to meet its current obligations during the next quarter on a timely basis, it must file a notice with the Finance Agency. Under the joint and several liability regulation, the Finance Agency may order any FHLBank to make principal and interest payments on any consolidated obligations of any other FHLBank, or allocate the outstanding liability of an FHLBank among all remaining FHLBanks on a pro rata basis in proportion to each FHLBank’s participation in all consolidated obligations outstanding or on any other basis.


188


Table of Contents

ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION

None.PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PwC) serves as the independent registered public accounting firm for the Bank. Rule 2-01(c)(1)(ii)(A) of Regulation S-X (the Loan Rule) prohibits an accounting firm, such as PwC, from having certain financial relationships with its audit clients and affiliated entities. Specifically, the Loan Rule, in relevant part, provides that an accounting firm generally would not be independent if it or a covered person in the firm received a loan from a lender that is a “record or beneficial owner of more than ten percent of the audit client’s equity securities.” A covered person in the firm includes personnel on the audit engagement team, personnel in the chain of command, partners and managers who provide ten or more hours of non-audit services to the audit client, and partners in the office where the lead engagement partner practices in connection with the client.
PwC has advised the Bank that PwC covered persons had lending relationships with two Bank shareholders (referred to below as the “Lenders”) that owned more than ten percent of the Bank’s capital stock during 2017. Under the Loan Rule, these lending relationships could call into question PwC’s independence with respect to the Bank. The Bank is providing this disclosure to explain the facts and circumstances, as well as PwC’s and the Audit Committee’s conclusions, concerning PwC’s objectivity and impartiality with respect to the audit of the Bank.
PwC advised the Audit Committee of the Bank that it believes that based on its analysis, PwC remains objective and impartial despite matters that may ultimately be determined to be inconsistent with the criteria set out in the rules and regulations of the SEC related to the Loan Rule, and therefore believes that it can continue to serve as the Bank’s independent registered public accounting firm. PwC also advised the Audit Committee that it believes that in light of its analysis, a reasonable investor possessing all the facts regarding the lending relationships described above and PwC audit relationships would conclude that PwC is able to exhibit the requisite objectivity and impartiality to report on the financial statements of the Bank as the independent registered public accounting firm. PwC has advised the Audit Committee that their views and conclusions are based in part on the following considerations:
the features of the holdings of the more than 10% shareholders, such as limited voting rights, demonstrate that their ownership of Bank capital stock does not call into question PwC’s objectivity and impartiality;
the covered persons do not play an active role in the conduct of the audit;
PwC professionals are required to disclose any relationships that may raise issues about objectivity, confidentiality, independence, conflicts of interest, or favoritism; and
the lead audit partner has no reason to believe that the Lenders have made any attempt to influence the conduct of the Bank’s audit or the objectivity and impartiality of any member of Pw C’s audit engagement team.
In addition, PwC identified no aspects of the lending relationships involving the covered persons that would impact PwC’s objectivity and impartiality.

The Bank’s Audit Committee evaluated the information provided by PwC regarding the Loan Rule and in light of this information, assessed PwC’s ability to perform an objective and impartial audit, including consideration of the ownership structure of the Bank, the limited voting rights of the Bank’s members, and the composition of the Bank’s Board of Director’s. In addition to the considerations listed above, the Audit Committee considered the following:
as of December 31, 2017, and as of the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, no officer or director of the Lenders served on the Bank’s Board of Directors;
only one of the Lenders will be eligible to vote in 2018, and only in the at-large independent directorship election; and
the Lenders are subject to the same terms and conditions for conducting business with the Bank as any other borrower.
Based on this evaluation, the Audit Committee concluded that PwC’s ability to exercise objective and impartial judgment on all issues encompassed within PwC’s audit engagement has not been impaired.


192189




PART III.

ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

The Board of Directors (Board) of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) is composed of member directors and nonmember independent directors. Each year the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) designates the total number of director positions for the Bank.Bank for the following year. Member director positions are allocated to each of the three states in the Bank's district. The allocation is based on the number of shares of capital stock required to be held by the members in each of the three states as of December 31 of the preceding calendar year (the record date), with at least one member director position allocated to each state and at least three member director positions allocated to California. Of the eight member director positions designated by the Finance Agency for 2014,2017 and 2018, one was allocated to Arizona, six were allocated to California, and one was allocated to Nevada. The nonmember independent director positions on the Board must be at least two-fifths of the number of member director positions and at least two of them must be public interest director positions. The Finance Agency designated sixseven nonmember independent director positions for 2014,2017 and 2018, two of which were public interest director positions.

The Bank holds elections each year for the director positions with terms ending at yearend, with new terms beginning the following January 1. For member director positions, members located in the relevant states as of the record date are eligible to participate in the election for the state in which they are located. For nonmember independent director positions, all members located in the district as of the record date are eligible to participate in the election. For each director position to be filled, an eligible institution may cast one vote for each share of capital stock it was required to hold as of the record date (according to the requirements of the Bank's capital plan), except that an eligible institution's votes for each director position to be filled may not exceed the average number of shares of capital stock required to be held by all of the members in that state as of the record date. In the case of an election to fill more than one member director position for a state, an eligible institution may not cumulate or divide its block of eligible votes. Interim vacancies in director positions are filled by the Board. The Board does not solicit proxies, nor are eligible institutions permitted to solicit or use proxies to cast their votes in an election.

Candidates for member director positions are not nominated by the Bank's Board. As provided for in the Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended (FHLBank Act), member director candidates are nominated by the institutions eligible to participate in the election in the relevant state. Candidates for nonmember independent director positions are nominated by the Board, following consultation with the Bank's Affordable Housing Advisory Council, and are reviewed by the Finance Agency. The Bank's Governance Committee performs certain functions that are similar to the functions of a nominating committee with respect to the nomination of nonmember independent directors. If only one individual is nominated by the Board for each open nonmember independent director position, that individual must receive at least 20% of the eligible votes to be declared elected; and if two or more individuals are nominated by the Board for any single open nonmember independent director position, the individual receiving the highest number of votes cast in the election must be declared elected by the Bank.

Each member director must be a citizen of the United States and must be an officer or director of a member of the Bank (located in the state to which the director position has been allocated) that meets all minimum capital requirements established by the member's appropriate Federal banking agency or appropriate state regulator. There are no other eligibility or qualification requirements in the FHLBank Act or the regulations governing the Federal Home Loan Banks (FHLBanks) for member directors. Each nonmember independent director must be a United States citizen and must maintain a principal residence in a state in the Bank’s district (or own or lease a residence in the district and be employed in the district). In addition, the individual may not be an officer of any FHLBank or a director, officer, or employee of any member of the Bank or of any recipient of advances from the Bank. Each nonmember independent director who serves as a public interest director must have more than four years of personal experience in representing consumer or community interests in banking services, credit needs, housing, or financial consumer protection. Each nonmember independent director other than a public interest director must have knowledge of, or experience in, financial management, auditing or accounting, risk management practices, derivatives, project development, organizational management, or law.


193190


Table of Contents


The term for each director position is four years (unless a shorter term is assigned by the Finance Agency for staggering purposes), and directors are subject to a limit on the number of consecutive terms they may serve. A director elected to three consecutive full terms on the Board is not eligible for election to a term that begins earlier than two years after the expiration of the third consecutive term. On an annual basis, the Bank's Board performs a Board assessment that includes consideration of the directors' backgrounds, experience, expertise, perspectives, length ofBoard service, and other factors. Also on an annual basis, each director certifies to the Bank that he or she continues to meet all applicable statutory and regulatory eligibility and qualification requirements. In connection with the election or appointment of a nonmember independent director, the nonmember independent director completes an application form providing information to demonstrate his or her eligibility and qualifications to serve on the Board. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, nothing has come to the attention of the Board or management to indicate that any of the current Board members do not continue to possess the necessary experience, qualifications, attributes, or skills expected of the directors to serve on the Bank's Board, as described in each director's biography below.

Information regarding the current directors and executive officers of the Bank is provided below. There are no family relationships among the directors or executive officers of the Bank. The Bank's Code of Conduct for Senior Officers, which applies to the president executive vice president, and senior vice presidents, and any amendments or waivers to the code are disclosed on the Bank's website located at www.fhlbsf.com.

The charter of the Audit Committee of the Bank's Board is available on the Bank's website at www.fhlbsf.com.

Board of Directors

The following table sets forth information (ages as of February 28, 2015)2018) regarding each of the Bank's directors.

NameAge
 
Director
Since
 
Expiration of
Current Term
John F. Luikart, Chairman(1)
65
 2007 2017
Douglas H. (Tad) Lowrey, Vice Chairman(2)(5)
62
 2006 2017
Bradley W. Beal(3)(6)(8)
61
 2014 2015
Craig G. Blunden(2)(5)(7)
67
 2012 2015
Steven R. Gardner(2)(6)
54
 2014 2017
Melinda Guzman(1)(5)(6)(7)
51
 2009 2016
Richard A. Heldebrant(2)(7)
62
 2013 2016
Simone Lagomarsino(2)(5)(6)(7)(8)
53
 2013 2016
Kevin Murray(1)
54
 2008 2015
Robert F. Nielsen(1)(6)(8)
68
 2009 2016
Brian M. Riley(4)
50
 2015 2018
John F. Robinson(2)(5)
68
 2011 2018
Scott C. Syphax(1)(6)(8)
51
 2002 2018
John T. Wasley(1)(6)(8)
53
 2007 2017
NameAge
 
Director
Since
 
Expiration of
Current Term
John F. (Jack) Luikart, Chair(1)(8)
68
 2007 2021
Brian M. Riley, Vice Chair(2)(6)(8)
53
 2015 2018
Jeffrey K. Ball(3)(6)
53
 2018 2020
Bradley W. Beal(4)(7)(9)
64
 2014 2019
Craig G. Blunden(5)
70
 2012 2019
Marangal (Marito) Domingo(5)
57
 2018 2021
Melinda Guzman(1)(7)
54
 2009 2019
Simone Lagomarsino(5)(6)(8)(9)
56
 2013 2020
Kevin Murray(1)
57
 2008 2019
Robert F. Nielsen(1)
71
 2009 2020
Joan Opp(5)(6)(7)
51
 2018 2021
John F. Robinson(5)(8)(9)
71
 2011 2018
F. Daniel Siciliano(1)(6)(9)
47
 2017 2020
Scott C. Syphax(1)(7)(8)(9)
54
 2002 2018
John T. Wasley(1)(7)(8)(9)
56
 2007 2021

(1)Elected as a nonmember independent director by the Bank members eligible to vote. Ms. Guzman also served as an appointive director from April 19, 2007, to December 31, 2008. Mr. Nielsen also served as an appointive director from April 19, 2007, to December 31, 2008, and from 1999 to 2001. Mr. Wasley also served as an appointive director from 2003 to 2005. With the enactment of the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008 (Housing Act) on July 30, 2008, the director positions previously appointed by the Federal Housing Finance Board (appointive director positions) became known as nonmember independent director positions, and the method for filling these positions was changed to election by the Bank members eligible to vote.
(2)Elected by the Bank’s Arizona members eligible to vote.
(3)Mr. Ball was selected by the Board to fill a vacant California member director position effective January 1, 2018.    
(4)Mr. Beal was declared elected by the Board as a Nevada director, for a four-year term beginning January 1, 2016. Previously, Mr. Beal was selected by the Board to fill the vacant Nevada director position and served from May 1, 2014 to December 31, 2015.
(5)Elected by the Bank's California members eligible to vote. Mr. Lowrey also served as a California director from January 1, 1996, to September 11, 1998, and from July 23, 1999, to December 31, 2003. Mr. Blunden also served as a California director from January 28, 1999, to December 31, 2006. Mr. Robinson also served as a California director from January 1, 2004, to September 11, 2005, and as a Nevada director from January 25, 2007, to October 9, 2008.
(3)Mr. Beal was selected by the Board to fill the vacant Nevada director position effective May 1, 2014.
(4)Elected by the Bank’s Arizona members eligible to vote.
(5)Member of the Audit Committee in 2015.

191


Table of Contents

(6)Member of the EEO-Personnel-CompensationAudit Committee in 2015.2018.

194

Table of Contents

(7)Member of the AuditCompensation and Human Resources Committee in 2014.2018.
(8)Member of the EEO-Personnel-CompensationAudit Committee in 2014.2017. Former director W. Douglas HileRichard A. Heldebrant served on the Audit Committee in 2017.
(9)Member of the Compensation and EEO-Personnel-Compensation CommitteesHuman Resources Committee in 2014.2017.

The Board has determined that Mr. LowreyMs. Lagomarsino is an “audit committee financial expert” within the meaning of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) rules. The Bank is required by SEC rules to disclose whether Mr. LowreyMs. Lagomarsino is independent and is required to use a definition of independence from a national securities exchange or national securities association. The Bank has elected to use the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ) definition of independence, and under that definition, Mr. LowreyMs. Lagomarsino is independent. In addition, Mr. LowreyMs. Lagomarsino is independent according to the rules governing the FHLBanks applicable to members of the audit committees of the boards of directors of the FHLBanks and the independence rules under Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

John F. (Jack) Luikart, ChairmanChair

John F. (Jack) Luikart has been president of Bethany Advisors LLC, San Francisco, California, since February 2007. He has also been a trustee of four asbestos trusts, including the Western Asbestos Settlement Trust, since 2004.2004 and a board member of Wells Fargo Real Estate Investment Trust and Ohio Wesleyan University since 2014. He was senior advisor to the CEO of Red Capital Group from July 2011 to July 2012 and was chairman of Wedbush Securities Inc., Los Angeles, California, from 2006 to 2010. Previously, he was president and chief operating officer of Tucker Anthony Sutro from 2001 to 2002 and chairman and chief executive officer of Sutro & Co. from 1996 to 2002. He joined Sutro & Co. in 1988 as executive vice president of capital markets and became president in 1990. Mr. Luikart's current position as the principal executive officer of an investment and financial advisory firm, his previous positions as director or principal executive officer of investment banking firms (or their affiliates), and his experience in investment management, capital markets, corporate finance, securitization, and mortgage finance and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Luikart's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Douglas H. (Tad) Lowrey,Brian M. Riley, Vice ChairmanChair

Douglas H. (Tad) LowreyBrian M. Riley has been chairman of Pacific Western Bank and its holding company, PacWest Bancorp, since the merger of CapitalSource Inc. and PacWest Bancorp in April 2014. Mr. Lowrey served as the chief executive officer of CapitalSource Bank, Los Angeles, California, from July 2008 to April 2014 and served as its chairman from 2012 until April 2014. Prior to that, he was chairman of Wedbush Bank from its inception in February 2008 to July 2008, and he was executive vice president of its holding company, Wedbush Inc., a financial services investment and holding company in Los Angeles, California, from January 2006 to June 2008. Mr. Lowrey was chairman, president and chief executive officer of Jackson FederalMohave State Bank, from February 1999 until its acquisition by Union Bank of California in October 2004.Lake Havasu City, Arizona, since March 2009. He has held positionsalso served as director, president, and chief executive officer andof State Bank Corp., the holding company for Mohave State Bank, since March 2009. He was the chief financial officer for severalof Mohave State Bank from April 2008 to March 2009. Prior to that, he was chief executive officer of Harbor Bank and Trust, a financial institutions,institution in organization in Southport, Connecticut. Mr. Riley has over 30 years of experience in banking including serving as vice president and chief executive officer of PriVest Bank, Costa Mesa, California, and holding other executive positions with Provident Savings Bank, Riverside, California, and Metro Commerce Bank, San Rafael, California. Mr. Riley is a director of the Thrift Institutions Advisory Council to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank, and as a member of the Savings Association Insurance Fund Industry Advisory Committee to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. He previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from 1996 to 1998 and from 1999 to 2003 and was its vice chairman in 2003.Arizona Bankers Association. Mr. Lowrey'sRiley’s current position as the chairmanprincipal executive officer of a Bank member;member, his previous executive positions as principal executive officer, principal financial officer, director, and chairman of Bank members andwith other financial institutions;institutions, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Lowrey'sRiley’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Jeffrey K. Ball

Jeffrey K. Ball has been president, chief executive officer and a director of Friendly Hills Bank, Whittier, California, since it was founded in September 2006. Prior to that, he was an Executive Vice President with Far East National Bank in Los Angeles, California. Mr. Ball serves as a director and executive committee member for the American Bankers Association and chairs their Government Relations Council. He is past chair of the California Bankers Association where he serves on the board of directors and chairs its Federal Government Relations Committee. Mr. Ball is on the board of directors and audit committee chair for Data Center, Inc., a financial technology company serving banks and credit unions. He is also the founder and current Board Chair of Kinetic Academy, a K-8 California public charter school, which includes financial education in its core curriculum. Mr. Ball’s current

192


Table of Contents

position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member, his current position and experience as a board member and audit committee chairman of a financial technology company, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Ball’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Bradley W. Beal

Bradley W. Beal has been a director of One Nevada Credit Union, Las Vegas, Nevada, since September 2017. He also served as president and chief executive officer of One Nevada Credit Union Las Vegas, Nevada, since 1990.from February 1990 to March 2018. Prior to that, Mr. Beal was senior vice president operations, Nevada Federal Credit Union (now One Nevada Credit Union) since 1987, and prior to that, president of Nevada State Employees Federal Credit Union, Carson City, Nevada. Mr. Beal is a member of the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, the Nevada

195

Table of Contents

CPA Society, and a former board member and chairman of the National Association of Federal Credit Unions. Mr. Beal's current position as a director of a Bank member, and his previous position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Beal's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Craig G. Blunden

Craig G. Blunden has been chairman and chief executive officer of Provident Savings Bank and Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., Riverside, California, since 1991 and 1996, respectively. Mr. Blunden served as president of Provident Savings Bank and Provident Financial Holdings, Inc., from 1991 to June 2011 and from 1996 to June 2011, respectively. He previously served on the Bank's Board from 1999 to 2006. He is currently on the board of directors of the CaliforniaWestern Bankers Association. Mr. Blunden is a past chairman of the Western League of Savings Institutions and served on the Thrift Institutions Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve System for two years. Mr. Blunden's current position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member and its holding company and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Blunden's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Steven R. GardnerMarangal (Marito) Domingo

Steven R. GardnerMarangal (Marito) Domingo has been the presidentchief investment officer and chief executivecredit officer and a director of Pacific Premier Bank and its holding company, Pacific Premier Bancorp, Irvine,First Technology Federal Credit Union, Mountain View, California, since September 2000. He was also chief operating officer of the bank and holding company from February 2000 to April 2004.March 2013. Prior to that, he was executive vice president and chief financial officer of Pacific Trust Bank from 2011 to 2012. Mr. Domingo has over 20 years of experience in banking, including serving as chief financial officer for Doral Bank, senior vice president at Hawthorne Financial from 1997 to January 2000. Mr. Gardner servesof finance of Treasury Bank, chief executive officer of Downey Savings, head of capital markets for Washington Mutual Bank, and treasurer for American Savings. He has also served on the Mortgage Bankers Association’s Residential Board of Directors of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco. He previously served as the vice chairman of the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco’s Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council, as a director of the Executive Committee of the Independent Community Bankers of America (ICBA),Governors, and as a directormember of ICBA Holding Companythe board of directors for the National Equity Fund (affordable housing), Greater Los Angeles Chamber of Commerce, and ICBA Securities, a registered broker-dealer.the Beaverton Education Foundation. Mr. Gardner'sDomingo’s current position as the principalan executive officer of a Bank member, his previous executive positions with other financial institutions, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Gardner'sDomingo’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Melinda Guzman

Melinda Guzman has been a chief executive officer of Melinda Guzman Professional Corporation, Sacramento, California, since 2009. She was a partner with Freeman & Guzman, LLP, a law firm in Sacramento, California, since 1999.from 1999 to 2015. Prior to that, she was a partner with Diepenbrock, Wulff, PlanPlant & Hannegan, LLP, also a law firm in Sacramento. Ms. Guzman's practice focuses on tort, labor, insurance, and commercial matters. She

193


Table of Contents

previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from April 2007 through December 2008. Ms. Guzman's involvement and experience in representing community and consumer interests with respect to banking services, in credit needs, in housing and consumer financial protections, and in corporate governance, as indicated by her background, and her management skills derived from her various legislative appointments and her service from 2002 to 2003 as chair of the Nehemiah Corporation of America (a community development corporation), her service from 2001 to 2004 as chairman of the California Hispanic Chamber of Commerce, and her service with other community-based organizations support Ms. Guzman's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Richard A. Heldebrant

Richard A. Heldebrant has been president and chief executive officer of Star One Credit Union, Sunnyvale, California, since 1997. Prior to that, Mr. Heldebrant held several executive and senior officer positions at credit unions for 16years. He served on the board of Western Corporate Federal Credit Union from 1994 to 1997.Mr. Heldebrant's current position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial

196

Table of Contents

reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Heldebrant's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Simone Lagomarsino

Simone Lagomarsino has been a director of Pacific Premier Bank, Irvine, California, and its holding company, Pacific Premier Bancorp since April 2017. Ms. Lagomarsino has also been the president and chief executive officer of the Western Bankers Association (formerly California Bankers Association) since April 2017. Prior to that she was chief executive officer and a director of Heritage Oaks Bank and president of Heritage Oaks Bancorp, Paso Robles, California, sincefrom September 2011.2011, until its merger with Pacific Premier Bank in April 2017. She also held the position of president of Heritage Oaks Bank from January 2012 through December 2014. Prior to that, Ms. Lagomarsino was president and chief executive officer of Kinecta Federal Credit Union from June 2006 through January 2010. Ms. LagomarsinoShe is a financial services professional with more than 30 years of experience in executive positions. Ms. Lagomarsino's current position as the principal executive officera director of a Bank member, her previous positions as chief executive officer or chief financial officer of Bank members or other financial institutions, and her involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by her background, support Ms. Lagomarsino's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Kevin Murray

Kevin Murray has been a principal in The Murray Group, a legal and consulting firm, since its founding in December 2006. Since May 2011, Mr. Murray has served as the president and chief executive officer of the Weingart Center Association. Mr. Murray was senior vice president of the William Morris Agency, Beverly Hills, California, from January 2007 to June 2009, working primarily in the company's corporate consulting division. Mr. Murray served as a California State Senator from December 1998 until November 2006, and as a California State Assembly member from December 1994 until November 1998. Prior to serving in the California State Legislature, Mr. Murray practiced law. Mr. Murray's involvement in legislative matters relating to, among other things, the banking and insurance industries, his experience in law and corporate governance practices, and his management skills, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Murray's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Robert F. Nielsen

Robert F. Nielsen has been president of Shelter Properties, Inc., a real estate development and management company based in Reno, Nevada, since 1979. Mr. Nielsen is a member of the National Association of Home Builders and was its chairman in 2011. He is also a past chairman of the State of Nevada Housing Division Advisory Committee. He previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from 1999 to 2001 and from April 2007 through December 2008. Mr. Nielsen's involvement and experience in representing community interests in affordable housing development and his management skills, as indicated by his background, and his role with the Affordable Housing Resource Council (a former nonprofit organization designed to provide technical assistance in affordable housing) and the Neighborhood Development Collaborative (owner and manager of affordable housing rental properties) support Mr. Nielsen's qualifications to serve as a public interest director on the Bank's Board. Mr. Nielsen is a principal shareholder and president of IDN1 Inc., which was created to invest in a multifamily tax credit property in Reno, Nevada. This property is owned by Northwest Partners, L.P., whose general partners are Santorini Corp., IDN1 Inc., and Community Services Agency Development Corporation, a nonprofit corporation under Internal Revenue Code Section 501(c)(3). Northwest Partners, L.P., filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on November 17, 2011. A plan of reorganization was confirmed by the court on February 25, 2013. Mr. Nielsen is also a managing member of Karen Partners, LLC, a Nevada limited liability

194


Table of Contents

company, which was created to invest in a multifamily tax credit property in Las Vegas, Nevada. This property was owned by Karen Partners, L.P., whose general partners are Karen Partners, LLC, and Community Services Agency Development Corporation. Karen Partners, L.P., filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on December 19, 2011. On November 26, 2012, the automatic stay was rescinded, and this property was foreclosed upon on December 19, 2012. Mr. Nielsen is also a manager of Ridge Seniors, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, which was created to invest in a multifamily tax credit program in Henderson, Nevada. This property is owned by Ridge Partners L.P., whose general partners are Ridge Seniors, LLC, and Silver Sage Manor, Inc. On March 15, 2012, Ridge Partners L.P. filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the

197

Table of Contents

U.S. Bankruptcy Code. A plan of reorganization was confirmed by the court on December 5, 2013. Mr. Nielsen is also principal shareholder and president of SUP III, Inc., which is a general partner in a multifamily tax credit property in Las Vegas, Nevada. This property was owned by East Freemont II L.P., whose general partners are SUP III, Inc., and SPE 2, LLC. East Freemont II L.P. filed a petition for protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code on June 21, 2012. The automatic stay was rescinded and this property was foreclosed upon on October 21, 2013.

Brian M. RileyJoan C. Opp

Brian M. RileyJoan C. Opp has been the president and chief executive officer of Mohave State Bank, Lake Havasu City, Arizona,Stanford Federal Credit Union, Palo Alto, California, since March 2009. HeMay 2010. From February 2002 to April 2010, she was theexecutive vice president and chief financial officer of the bank from April 2008 to March 2009.for Texas Trust Credit Union overseeing accounting, information technology, marketing and business services, as well as three credit union service organizations. Prior to that, heMs. Opp was chief executive officera partner with the CPA firm of Harbor BankClifton Gunderson, LLP, and Trust, a financial institution in organization in Southport, Connecticut. Mr. Riley has over 30 years of experience in banking, including serving as president and chief executive officer of PriVest Bank, Costa Mesa, California, and holding other executive positions with Provident Savings Bank, Riverside, California, and Metro Commerce Bank, San Rafael, California. Mr. Riley is a directorCertified Public Accountant. Ms. Opp serves on the board of the Arizona Bankers Association. Mr. Riley’sdirectors of CO-OP Financial. Ms. Opp’s current position as the principal executive officer of a Bank member, hisher previous executive positions with other financial institutions, and hisher involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by hisher background, support Mr. Riley’sMs. Opp’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

John F. Robinson

John F. Robinson has been a director of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Santa Clara, California, and its holding company, SVB Financial Group, since July 2010. He chairs the SVB board’s audit committee and is a chartered financial analyst. From 2002 to 2008, he was executive vice president of Washington Mutual Bank. From 1987 to 2002, he served in several senior bank regulatory roles, including Deputy Comptroller of the Currency for the Western District and Assistant Director for Policy and Western Region Director for the Office of Thrift Supervision. Mr. Robinson previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from 2004 to 2005 and 2007 to 2008. From 2002 to 2013, he was a member of the national board and executive board for Operation HOPE, an international nonprofit organization focused on financial literacy and empowerment. Mr. Robinson's current position as the director of a Bank member, previous positions as an executive officer of a Bank member and a senior bank regulator, and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Robinson's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

F. Daniel Siciliano

F. Daniel Siciliano is the co-founder of Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance and is the current co-director of the Rock Center’s Directors’ College. He has previously served as professor of the practice of law, faculty director of the Rock Center for Corporate Governance, and associate dean for executive education and special programs at Stanford Law School, Stanford, California. Mr. Siciliano is currently the chair of the board of trustees of the American Immigration Council and Co-Chair of the We Robot Conference on AI, Robotics, and Public Policy. As of 2011, he has been an advisory board member and visiting professor for the Corporate Governance Center and Law School of Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. Previously, he was co-founder, chief executive officer, and executive chairman of LawLogix Group, Inc., a privately held software technology company from 2000 to October 2015. Mr. Siciliano’s current and previous positions as a law professor and director

195


Table of Contents

at Stanford’s Rock Center for Corporate Governance, his previous experience as an executive officer of a software technology company; and his involvement in and knowledge of corporate governance, finance, auditing, accounting, internal controls, risk management, financial reporting, and financial management as indicated by his background, support Mr. Siciliano’s qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Scott C. Syphax

Scott C. Syphax has been presidentthe CEO of Syphax Strategic Inc., a management consulting and chief executive officerbusiness development firm focused on the real estate development and community finance sector, since February 2017 and has served as chairman of Nehemiah Corporation of America, a community development corporation in Sacramento, California, since 2001, and is also president and2011. He previously held the position of chief executive officer of Nehemiah Corporation of America and its affiliates.affiliates from 2001 to 2017, and was president from 2001 through June 2015. Mr. Syphax has also been a member of the Board of Directors of the Greenlining Institute since 2017. From 1999 to 2001, Mr. Syphax was a manager of public affairs for Eli Lilly & Company. He was vice chairmanchair of the Bank's Board of Directors from January 2010 through January 2012. Mr. Syphax's involvement and experience in representing community interests in housing and his management skills, as indicated by his background, support Mr. Syphax's qualifications to serve as a public interest director on the Bank's Board.

John T. Wasley

John T. Wasley has been a managing partner of Caldwell Partners,consultant with Spencer Stuart, a global retained executive search firm, in their Los Angeles, California office, since April 2013.2017. Prior to that, he was a managing partner with Caldwell Partners, Los Angeles, California, from 2013 to 2017, and was a managing partner with Heidrick & Struggles, Los Angeles, California sincefrom June 2005.2005 to 2013. Mr. Wasley joined Heidrick & Struggles as a partner in 2001. Previously, he was an executive director with Russell Reynolds Associates and a senior vice president of People's Bank of California. He previously served on the Bank's Board of Directors from 2003 to 2005. Mr. Wasley's involvement in and knowledge of human resources, compensation practices, and corporate governance practices, and his management skills, as indicated by his background above, along with his previous positions as principal executive officer and principal

198

Table of Contents

financial officer of real estate investment firms andposition as an executive officer of a financial institution with which Mr. Wasley had involvement in or knowledge of corporate governance practices, bank relations, financial operations, treasury functions, and financial management, support Mr. Wasley's qualifications to serve on the Bank's Board.

Executive Officers

Dean SchultzJ. Gregory Seibly

Dean Schultz, 68,J. Gregory Seibly, 54, has been president and chief executive officer since April 1991. Mr. Schultz is vice chairman of the board of directors of the Office of Finance, which facilitates the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations for the FHLBanks.May 2016. Prior to joining the Bank, he was executive viceserved as president of the Federal Home Loanconsumer banking at Umpqua Bank of New York, wherefrom its April 2014 merger with Sterling Financial Corporation (Sterling) until May 2016. From October 2009 to April 2014, he had also served as senior vice president and general counsel. From 1980 to 1984, he was senior vice president and general counsel with First Federal Savings and Loan Association of Rochester, New York. He previously was a partner in a Rochester law firm.

Lisa B. MacMillen

Lisa B. MacMillen, 55, has been executive vice president and chief operatingexecutive officer since October 2007. Ms. MacMillen also served as senior vice president and corporate secretary from 1998 to October 2007of Sterling and as general counsel from 1998 to April 2005. She joineda member of the board of directors. Before joining Sterling in 2007, he was president of U.S. Bank as a staff attorney– California. With 30 years of industry experience, Mr. Seibly has also held executive-level positions in 1986. She was promoted to assistant vice presidentcommercial banking at Wells Fargo Bank and in 1992 and vice president in 1997.healthcare finance at Bank of America. He currently serves on the board of the Pacific Coast Bankers School.

Elena Andreadakis

Elena Andreadakis, 53,56, has been senior vice president, chief administrative officer since March 2017. Previously, Ms. Andreadakis was senior vice president and chief information officer sincefrom May 2011.2011 to March 2017. Prior to joining the Bank, she was a senior vice president at Fidelity Investments, where she had worked since 1992. She most recently led the service and program management group for Fidelity's enterprise infrastructure organization. Prior to that, Ms. Andreadakis held a number of other senior-level business and information technology positions, with responsibility for managing a wide range of systems and business initiatives.

Gregory P. Fontenot
196


Gregory P. Fontenot, 56, has been senior vice president, human resources, office
Table of minority and women inclusion,Contents
and facilities management since October 2011. Previously, he was senior vice president and director of human resources from January 2006 to October 2011. Mr. Fontenot joined the Bank in March 1996 as assistant vice president, compensation and benefits, and was promoted to vice president, human resources, in 2001. Prior to joining the Bank, he was the director of compensation and benefits for CompuCom Systems, Inc., and held managerial and professional positions in human resources for a number of other companies. Mr. Fontenot holds the Senior Professional in Human Resources designation from the Human Resources Certification Institute and the Society for Human Resource Management Senior Certified Professional designation.

Kevin A. Gong

Kevin A. Gong, 55,58, has been senior vice president and chief corporate securities counsel since April 2005. Mr. Gong joined the Bank in 1997 as vice president and associate general counsel. He has previous experience as a senior attorney with the Office of Thrift Supervision, as an attorney in private practice, and as an attorney with the SEC in both the Division of Corporation Finance and the Division of Market Regulation.

David H. MartensJanet (Jan) Homan

David H. Martens, 62,Janet (Jan) Homan, 58, has been senior vice president, and chief riskhuman resources officer since February 2017. Ms. Homan was also the Bank’s office of minority and women inclusion officer from February 2017 to June 2010. Previously, Mr. Martens2017. Prior to joining the Bank, she served as head of human resources of MACH Energy from 2007 to 2015. From 2000 to 2007, Ms. Homan served as senior human resources business partner and principal of Barclays Global Investor, and from 1991 to 2000 she was senior vice president, and directorpersonnel executive for Bank of internal audit and enterprise risk management from June 2009 to May 2010. Mr. Martens served as senior vice president, credit and collateral risk management, from 1998 to May

199


2009 and also had responsibility for enterprise risk management from 2004 to 2009. Mr. Martens was also the senior officer overseeing the Bank's community investment programs from 1998 to 2004. He joined the Bank in April 1996 as vice president and director of internal audit. He has previous experience as chief accountant for the Office of Thrift Supervision, chief accountant for the Federal Home Loan Bank Board and Federal Home Loan Bank System Examination and Supervision, vice president and supervisory agent with the Bank, and independent auditor and audit manager with Ernst & Young LLP. He is a certified financial services auditor and certified public accountant.America.

Kenneth C. Miller

Kenneth C. Miller, 62,65, has been senior vice president and chief financial officer since August 2011. Previously, Mr. Miller was senior vice president, financial risk management and strategic planning, from 2001 to August 2011. Mr. Miller joined the Bank in July 1994 as vice president, financial risk management. Previously, Mr. Miller held the position of senior vice president, asset liability management, at First Nationwide Bank.

Lawrence H. Parks

Lawrence H. Parks, 53,56, has been senior vice president, external, legislative, and regulatory affairs since March 2017. Previously, he was senior vice president, external and legislative affairs, since joining the Bank in 1997. from 1997 to March 2017.
Mr. Parks had previous experience at the U.S. Department of Commerce as senior policy advisor to the Secretary, with the Mortgage Bankers Association as associate legislative counsel/director, and with the U.S. Senate Banking Committee as legislative counsel.

Patricia M. Remch

Patricia M. Remch, 62,65, has been senior vice president, sales, marketing, and marketing,business development since August 2011.March 2017. Previously, Ms. Remch was senior vice president, sales and marketing, from August 2011 to March 2017, and was senior vice president, mortgage finance sales and product development, from February 2005 to August 2011. Ms. RemchShe joined the Bank as an economist in 1982. She1982, was promoted to capital markets specialist, and became vice president, sales manager, in 1998.

Robert M. Shovlowsky

Robert M. Shovlowsky, 56, joined the Bank in May 2009 as senior vice president, chief credit and collateral risk management officer. Before joining the Bank, Mr. Shovlowsky was a senior bank examiner at the Federal Housing Finance Agency. Prior to that, he was an assistant regional director at the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation.

Suzanne Titus-Johnson

Suzanne Titus-Johnson, 57,60, has been senior vice president and general counsel since April 2005, and she has also served as corporate secretary since October 2007. Ms. Titus-Johnson joined the Bank as a staff attorney in 1986, and was promoted to assistant vice president and associate general counsel in 1992, to vice president and associate general counsel in 1997, and to vice president and assistant general counsel in 1997.2003.

Stephen P. Traynor

Stephen P. Traynor, 58,61, has been senior vice president, chief banking officer since March 2017. Previously, Mr. Traynor was senior vice president, member financial services and community investment, sincefrom July 2004. Mr. Traynor2004 to March 2017. He joined the Bank in 1995 as assistant treasurer. Hetreasurer and was promoted to senior vice president, sales and marketing, in October 1999. Before joining the Bank, heMr. Traynor held vice president positions at Morgan Stanley & Co. and at Homestead Savings in the areas of mortgage banking, fixed income securities, derivatives, and capital markets.

Mark J. Watson
197

Mark J. Watson, 53, joined the Bank in October 2010 as senior vice president and director of internal audit. Before joining the Bank, Mr. Watson was the senior vice president and director of internal audit at Borel Private Bank &

200


Trust Company. He was previously theLisa Violet

Lisa Violet, 49, has been senior vice president and chief operatingrisk officer since April 2017. Prior to joining the Bank, Ms. Violet was the chief audit executive at Charles SchwabHitachi Data Systems from 2014 to 2017. Prior to her tenure at Hitachi Data Systems, she served in a number of senior positions in the banking industry, at institutions including Wells Fargo & Company and MUFG Union Bank, and was chief risk officer at the Bank of the Orient. Ms. Violet is a Chartered Accountant.

Gregory A. Ward

Gregory A. Ward, 48, has been senior vice president, chief audit executive since July 2017. Previously, Mr. Ward was senior vice president and director, internal audit, from January 2017 to July 2017. He joined the Bank in November 2013 as vice president, internal audit, and was promoted to deputy director in June 2016. Before joining the Bank, he worked with Ernst & Young LLP for 12 years in its Financial Services Advisory Practice. Prior to his tenure at Ernst & Young, Mr. Ward worked in the internalcaptive insurance industry in Bermuda and for Price Waterhouse in the United Kingdom in its external audit department at Charles Schwab & Company. Mr. Watson also held positions at Bankers Trust and KPMG.practice. He is a chartered accountant.Chartered Accountant and Certified Internal Auditor.

ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

This section provides information on the compensation program of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) for our named executive officers for 2014.2017. Our named executive officers are our principal executive officers, our principal financial officer, and our other three most highly compensated executive officers.

EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee

The EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee (Compensation Committee) of the Bank's Board of Directors (Board) is responsible for, among other things, reviewing and making recommendations to the full Board regarding compensation and incentive plan awards for the Bank's executive officers (the president executive vice president, and senior vice presidents, other than the Director of InternalChief Audit Executive, for whom compensation is established by the Audit Committee). The Compensation Committee is also responsible for reviewing and making recommendations regarding compensation for the directors. For 2015,2018, the Compensation Committee consists of sevenfive members of the Board. In 2014,2017, the Compensation Committee consisted of fivesix members of the Board. The Compensation Committee acts pursuant to a Board-approved charter and may rely on the assistance, advice, and recommendations of the Bank's management and other advisors and may refer specific matters to other committees of the Board. In addition, the Risk Committee of the Board is responsible for oversight of the Bank's enterprise-wide risk management framework, including overseeing an annual risk assessment of the Bank's compensation policies and practices for the Bank's employees.

Certain members of senior management assist the Compensation Committee in its responsibilities by providing compensation and performance information regarding our executive officers.

With respect to the compensation of the named executive officers of a Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank), the Federal Housing Finance Agency (Finance Agency) requires that an FHLBank provide the Finance Agency with copies of all materials related to the compensation decisions of the FHLBank's board of directors for its review prior to the compensation decisions taking effect.

The Finance Agency’s Advisory Bulletin 2009-AB-02 outlinedoutlines several principles for sound incentive compensation practices to which the FHLBanks are expected to adhere in setting executive compensation policies and practices. On January 28, 2014, theThe Finance Agency issued a finalAgency’s rule setting forth requirements and processes with respect to compensation provided to certain executive officers by FHLBanks and the Office of Finance. The final ruleFinance addresses the authority of the Finance Agency Director to approve, disapprove, prohibit, or withhold compensation of certain executive officers of the FHLBanks and the Office of Finance. The final rule also addresses the Director’s authority to approve, in advance, agreements or

198



contracts of certain executive officers that provide compensation in connection with termination of employment. The final rule prohibits an FHLBank or the Office of Finance from paying compensation to certain executive officers that is not reasonable and comparable withto compensation paid by similar businesses for similar duties and responsibilities. The final rule became effective on February 27, 2014.

Our Executive Compensation Philosophy and Executive Compensation Program

The Bank has a Board-approved Executive Compensation Philosophy that forms the basis of our executive compensation program. In accordance with our Executive Compensation Philosophy, we believe that to attract and retain outstanding executives we must be able to provide an executive compensation package that is competitive and appropriately motivates and rewards the executive officers who make contributions of special importance to the success of the Bank's business. Our executive compensation program provides total compensation consisting ofremuneration, which includes base salary, short- and long-term cash incentive compensation, and retirement benefits.


201


The Bank's Executive Compensation Philosophy states that total compensation is intended to align the interests of the named executive officersexecutives and other executiveskey employees with the short-term and long-term interests of the Bank, to ensure an appropriate level of competitiveness within the marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent, and to encourage the named executive officersexecutives and other executivekey employees to remain employed with the Bank. The Bank's Executive Compensation Philosophy provides that total remuneration (base salary, short- and long-term cash incentives, and retirement benefits) is also intended to motivate executives to deliver exceptional performance without encouraging unnecessary or excessive risk-taking.

Total Compensation is Intended to Reward Achievement of Individual Performance Goals and Contribution to the Bank's Corporate Goals and Performance Targets. Targets and Achievement of Individual Performance Goals.We have structured our executive compensation program to reward achievement of individual performance goals and contributions in support of the Bank's corporate goals and performance targets, including those set forth in the Bank's strategic plan.plan, and achievement of individual performance goals. In addition to base salary, our short- and long-term cash incentive compensation plans create an award program for executives who contribute to and influence the achievement of the Bank's mission and other key objectives contained in the Bank's strategic plans and who are responsible for the Bank's performance. The Bank's overall executive compensation programs reward sustained performance through the balanced use of short- and long-term incentives, which represent a substantial portion of pay at-risk, and through competitive retirement benefits, which promote the alignment of executive and Bank interests over the long term.

The Bank's mission is to provide wholesale productsBeginning with 2017, the Board replaced the Bank’s traditional short- and services that help member financial institutions expandlong-term executive incentive plans as part of the availabilityBank’s overall compensation program and effectively combined short-term and long-term executive incentive programs into one omnibus incentive plan for all senior executive officers (the Executive Incentive Plan, “EIP”). See “Executive Incentive Plan” below for a discussion of mortgage credit, compete more effectivelythe EIP for 2017. For information regarding the Bank’s traditional short-term executive incentive plans (e.g., the 2016 President’s Incentive Plan and the 2016 Executive Incentive Plan) and traditional long-term executive incentive plan (e.g., the 2016 Executive Performance Unit Plan), see the discussion in their markets,“Item 11. Executive Compensation – Compensation Discussion and foster strongAnalysis – Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program – Short-Term Cash Incentive Plans: President's Incentive Plan and vibrant communities through communityExecutive Incentive Plan” and economic development. In accomplishing“Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan: Executive Performance Unit Plan” in the Bank's mission,Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the Bank also aims to provide a reasonable return to its members consistent with the Bank's public policy purpose, to consistently operate to best practices, and to accomplish its goals with a diverse and highly motivated staff.year ended December 31, 2016.

Each Year, the Bank Establishes Specific Corporate Goals Consistent with the Bank's Strategic Plan. Similar to 2013, for 2014For 2017, the Board adopted threefour corporate goals: athe Risk Management goal, athe Franchise Enhancement goal, the Community Investment goal, and a Franchise Enhancementthe Organizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion goal.

For 2014,2017, the Risk Management goal focused management on benchmarking for key risk management functions to industry and regulatory standards relating to operations risk, model risk, and cyber security.
Consistentthe Bank’s Technology Resiliency initiative with the Bank's public policy purposes,objective of implementing critical business process applications and mitigating certain physical location risks. In addition, the Community InvestmentRisk Management goal for 2014 focused management on meetingbusiness continuity and crisis management by continuing to enhance the Bank's objective to support and promote community investment, affordable housing, and economic development activities. These efforts both complement and constitute elementsBank’s recovery resilience by further maturing the enterprise crisis management framework through increased crisis team member preparedness, along with continued integration of the Bank's core businessBank’s

199



information services disaster recovery and mission endeavors. The Community Investment goal for 2014 focused management on the number of members using the community investment programs and the amount of new advances funded and letters of credit issued under the Bank’s Community Investment Cash Advance credit programs during 2014.information security incident response protocols to ensure a cohesive recovery.

The Franchise Enhancement goal for 2014 aligned management's interest with2017 had three components. The first was a financial performance goal component, measuring the adjusted return on capital spread to a designated benchmark. This goal component recognized that among the many attributes of Bank membership, an adequate financial return on the private capital that members contribute to the cooperative is important to the members as shareholders. The financial performance goal component was expressed as a target adjusted return on capital spread (AROCS), which is the adjusted return on capital less the benchmark yield on capital. This goal component was based on the 2017 financial plan. Achievement of the Meets (100% of target) level of 3.06% AROCS required that the Bank:
price advances such that balances are maintained without diluting financial return;
generate $280 million in spread earnings from the Bank’s objectiveportfolio of mortgage-backed securities and mortgage loans; and
manage operating costs within 2017 budget levels while continuing to remain an integralmeet all strategic and operating objectives.

This goal component was designed to be reasonably challenging to accomplish because, among other things, it required the Bank to generate pre-assessment net income (excluding the impact of other-than-temporary impairment charges and gains on litigation settlements) significantly higher than 2017 projections to reach and exceed the target levels. Given the limited options the Bank has to increase earnings while staying within the Bank’s risk tolerances, the achievement levels above target represented significant stretch objectives.

The second component of the changing housing and financial services markets,Franchise Enhancement goal was to continue to meetimplement the Bank’s missionoperating cost efficiency initiative, which required the Bank to perform analyses and develop preliminary objectives within these markets as currently structured, and operational plans leading to influenceimproved operating efficiency and adaptmeaningful and sustainable long-term annual run-rate operating expense reductions, relative to any structural changes.the 2016 operating expense budget.

The 2014third component of the 2017 Franchise Enhancement goal included milestones for progress on the initiative to replace the Bank's information technology platform relating to front office and back office processing systems. The 2014 Franchise Enhancement goal also included three Member Business goalswas designed to focus management on member business by: (i) achieving advances and letters of credit targeted balances, certain Mortgage Partnership Finance program targets,volumes; and a letters of credit conversion target based on the number of members using Bank letters of credit.(ii) increasing member engagement. The Board set the target achievement levels for the Member Business goalstargeted advances and letters of credit volumes based on various assumptions, such as economic forecasts, detailed member information, potential member business, historical goal performance, industry trends and events, and current market environment and conditions, such that the relative difficulty of achieving the target level was commensurate with extending credit to members in a safe and sound manner.

Consistent with the Bank's public policy purposes, the Community Investment goal for 2017 focused management on meeting the Bank's objective to make available advances and credit programs that promote and assist housing and community economic development activities and to provide resources and assistance to members in achieving their community lending goals. These efforts both complement and constitute elements of the Bank's core business and mission endeavors. The 2014 Franchise EnhancementCommunity Investment goal alsofor 2017 included a financialachievement levels for the number of members that used an advance or letter of credit under the Community Investment Program (CIP) or Advances for Community Enterprise (ACE) Program and the number of members that participated in the Access to Housing and Economic Assistance for Development (AHEAD) Program during 2017.

The Organizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion goal calledrecognized that organizational health and culture play an important role in maximizing the Adjusted Return on Capital Spread goal.long-term performance and success of the Bank and that promoting diversity and inclusion is integral to achieving this objective. This goal was reasonablyspecifically recognized that placing a high value on the individual skills, talents, ideas, viewpoints, and experiences of the Bank’s team members helps the Bank gain a broader perspective when it comes to meeting the diverse and changing needs of our members and the communities the Bank serves and that promoting vendor and supplier diversity at all levels of the Bank directly contributes to the Bank’s mission of fostering strong and vibrant communities through economic development opportunities. For 2017, this goal focused the Bank on: providing diversity and inclusion training to all employees, developing and implementing a formal supplier diversity program, presenting a “Leadership Series” for key groups of women and m

202200



challenging to accomplishinorities in Bank leadership positions (Women in Leadership Series and required, among other things, the Bank to maintain 2014 average annual balancesMinorities in Leadership Series), and spreads for advances, MBS,developing and mortgage loans close to the 2014 plan projections, atimplementing a time when member liquidity was high, demand for funding remained low,formal minority, women, and there was volatility in the mortgage and capital markets, and to manage operating costs within the 2014 operating expense budget, while continuing to meet all strategic and operating objectives. Given the Bank’s business model and conservative risk appetite, the achievement levels above target represented significant stretch objectives.disabled internship program.

Each Year, the Bank Establishes Individual Goals for Executives Consistent with the Bank's Strategic Plan.Plan. The individual performance goals established for executive officers are generally based on the Bank's strategic plan and reflect the strategic objectives that will enable the Bank to successfully achieve its mission. TheseThe strategic objectives for 20142017 were tointended to: strengthen the Bank's financial and member services franchise; improvereduce the Bank'sBank’s core operating cost efficiency;expenses relative to the 2016 Budget to a sustainable and scale-appropriate level while retaining and enhancing the Bank’s ability to efficiently and effectively deliver value to members, manage risks, and satisfy compliance obligations; promote and enhance the effectiveness of the Bank'sBank’s Affordable Housing Program and community investment programs.Community Investment Programs; strengthen the Bank’s organizational effectiveness by enhancing the Bank’s working environment and advancing diversity and inclusion; and position the Bankas a proactive thought-leader for members and the FHLBank System.

The Bank's Short-TermExecutive Incentive Compensation Plans were Designed to Calculate Executive Officers' Achievement Levels on a Weighted Basis to Ensure that a Proper Balance Occurs in Achieving the Bank's Mission in a Safe and Sound Manner.With respect to each of the named executive officers for 2014,2017, the achievement levels of each of the threefour Bank corporate goals (the Risk Management goal, the Franchise Enhancement goal, the Community Investment goal, and the Franchise EnhancementOrganizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion goal) were weighted for each officer type (president, executive vice president, senior vice president, and senior vice president and chief risk officer) relative tobased on their respective roles and areas of oversight. The four Bank corporate goals were weighted at 90% in the aggregate and the individual goal weighting for that officer type in calculating each named executive officer's individualweighted at 10% of the total weighted achievement level.level for each officer.

The weightings of the Bank's corporate goals arewere approved by the Board and arewere designed to appropriately focus senior management on accomplishing the Bank's mission and strategic plan. See “President's Incentive Plan” and “Executive Incentive Plan” below for a discussion of the relative weights given to corporate goals and individual goals for each component of the short-term incentive plansExecutive Incentive Plan for 2017 for the named executive officers.

Our Executive Compensation Program is Designed to Enable the Bank to Compete for Highly Qualified Executive TalentTalent..Our members are best served when we attract and retain talented executives with competitive and fair compensation packages. In 2014,2017, our objective was to create an executive compensation program that delivered total compensation packages that generally fell around the median (50th(50th percentile) of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent, which may include regional and diversifiedcommunity banks and thrift and mortgage finance companies, among others,diversified financial institutions, while maintaining an appropriate alignment with the practices of other FHLBanks.

The Compensation Committee recognized that comparing our compensation practices to a group of other financial services and banking firms that are similar in total assets presents some challenges because of the special nature of our business and our cooperative ownership structure. We believe that the executive roles of our named executive officers are somewhat comparable to those in the comparison group, although the Bank may have a narrower business focus.

Our named executive officers are required to have the same depth of knowledge and experience that is required by comparable financial services and banking firms, but unlike some of these comparable companies with multiple lines of business, our lines of business are limited. For example, in certain areas of the Bank our focus is more like that of a specific subsidiary, division, or business unit of comparable companiesfinancial institutions with multiple lines of business.

For purposes of developing comparative compensation information, the companies with comparable positions were financial services and banking firms with similar business sophistication and complexity. In supporting compensation decisions, the Compensation Committee uses and considers compensation information about the comparable positions at these companies. Each element of compensation may vary somewhat above or below the market median of the related comparisons. Furthermore, compensation levels for individual levels may recognize

In November
201



additional factors, such as regional salary differences, recruitment or retention, special duties or responsibilities, sustained performance results, leadership succession planning, and/or internal equity considerations.

Since 2014, the Compensation Committee has engaged McLagan Partners, Inc. (McLagan), a leading global management consulting firm providing consulting and benchmarking services for the financial services industry, for

203


the purpose of providing the Compensation Committee with annual competitive market compensation benchmarkingreference and comparative information. During 2017, McLagan also provided advice to the Compensation Committee on amendments to the Bank’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and on director compensation. McLagan does not currently provide any other services to the Bank. In December 2014,September 2017, McLagan assessed the Bank’s competitive market position.position with respect to its executive compensation program. McLagan used market data collected from its compensation surveys and publicly available proxy data. McLagan used standardized peer group data from twothree groups: large commercial banks with assets of $20 billionincumbents located in metro San Francisco and greatermetro New York; metro Federal Home Loan Banks (Atlanta, Chicago, and Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac and the Federal Reserve Banks;New York); and public proxy peers with assets between $5$10 billion and $20 billion. A Federal Home Loan Banks peer group was included as reference. When comparing Bank executives using the large commercial bank peer group, direct reportsbanks, specific job positions were used. When comparing Bank executives to theother Federal Home Loan Banks, overall head of the functionfunctional heads were used. When using the $5$10 billion to $20 billion peer group, a direct comparison of top paid executives was made using salary rank from the proxies. When using the Federal Home Loan Banks peer group, a direct comparisonregardless of overall functional heads was used.position. The Compensation Committee used the McLagan market data as a reference point for evaluating 20142017 executive compensation levels and to check and compare the reasonableness and appropriateness of the levels of compensation provided to our senior executives.

Prior to the engagement of McLagan, the Compensation Committee used Mercer (US) Inc. (Mercer), a nationally recognized global compensation consulting firm, to provide information to the Compensation Committee analyzing compensation paid to executives in comparable positions at other companies as well as customized external executive compensation data. Mercer did not provide any other services to the Bank.

In developing the Bank's 2014 executive compensation program, Mercer provided the Compensation Committee with a customized executive compensation benchmark study from three sources: 1) a public company peer group consisting of senior executive positions at small banks, insurance companies, and diversified financial services companies; 2) a survey of business unit executives at the subsidiary level at large financial institutions; and 3) a survey of executives at other FHLBanks. From this study, adjustments were made to the benchmark position data to account for, among other things, asset-size differences to obtain the most comparable organization size match of the benchmark data to the Bank's senior executive positions. Adjustments were also made to the peer group data to account for differences in pay practices and senior executive responsibilities between publicly traded organizations and the Bank. Following the adjustments, a peer group selection process was conducted by Mercer and the Compensation Committee.

For the 2014 executive compensation program, 15 companies were identified as the Bank's peer group for comparison and benchmarking purposes. These 15 companies are as follows: Protective Life Corporation; CME Group Inc.; IntercontinentalExchange, Inc.; Symetra Financial Corporation; First Republic Bank; MBIA Inc.; City National Corporation; American National Insurance Company; East West Bancorp, Inc.; SVB Financial Group; Webster Financial Corporation; StanCorp Financial Group, Inc.; Torchmark Corporation; NASDAQ OMX Group, Inc.; and FBL Financial Group, Inc.

For the 2014 executive compensation program, Mercer used the same survey sources as in prior years and largely the same executive job matches as in 2013. The Mercer study also provided year-over-year median market movement information for the peer group.

The Compensation Committee used the Mercer study and the peer group comparison data to support and inform its compensation decisions and to check and compare the reasonableness and appropriateness of the levels of senior executive compensation in developing the 2014 executive compensation program. Since certain elements or components of compensation (for example, base pay) may also be based on a combination of factors, such as salary surveys, relevant experience, accomplishments of the individual, and levels of responsibility assumed at the Bank, each individual element of compensation may vary somewhat above or below the targeted ranges of comparable positions at the Bank's peer group companies.
Allocation of Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation and Long-Term Cash Incentive Compensation.Our objective is to compensate our senior executives, including our named executive officers, with a balanced combination of base salary and short- and long-term cash incentive compensation.

We believe that a balanced

204


approach in delivering short- and long-term cash incentive compensation is most appropriate for the Bank because we believe our executives should be focused on achievement of both short- and long-term goals. Consistent with the Bank's three-year strategic plans and its Executive Compensation Philosophy, long-term cash incentive compensation helps provide a competitive total cash compensation package and enhances the Bank's ability to attract and retain key executives.

Short-termThe Bank’s short-term cash incentive compensation rewards the named executive officers and other executive officers for the Bank's achievement of its annual corporate goals and performance targets and for the officer's achievement of his or her individual goals. Long-termThe Bank’s long-term cash incentive compensation rewards the named executive officers and other executive officers for the Bank's achievement of its goals and performance targets over a three-year period. Consistent with

Beginning in 2017 under the Bank's three-year strategic plans and its Executive Compensation Philosophy,EIP, we restructured the traditional long-term cash incentive component of our compensation also helps provideprogram to tie long-term cash incentive rewards to the sustainability of goal achievements over a competitive total cashlong-term period, rather than to the achievement of goals over a prospective three-year period. This change was made to promote the Bank’s long-term health by deterring behavior or inappropriate risk-taking that could lead to material financial loss at the Bank. This approach and design for long-term compensation packageis consistent with developing practices to better recognize risk outcomes in incentive-based compensation decision making and enhances the Bank's ability to attractbetter balance risk and retain key executives.reward.

Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program

Base Salary Compensation

Base salary compensation is a key component of the Bank's executive compensation program and helps the Bank successfully attract and retain executive talent. Base salary for the named executive officers is based on a combination of factors, including comparative salary information from industry salary surveys that include the financial institutions in the Bank's peer group.groups. Other factors include the named executive officer's relevant experience and accomplishments, level of responsibility at the Bank, and perceived market competition for

202



executives with comparable levels of experience. The Board considers any base salary adjustments for the named executive officers at the beginning of each year based on the individual's performance and contributions to the Bank's achievements, or to help more appropriately align total remuneration with comparable positions in the financial services marketplace.

Short-Term Cash Incentive Plans: President's Incentive Plan and Executive Incentive Plan

For 2014,Beginning with 2017, the Bank providedBoard adopted the Executive Incentive Plan (EIP), which provides for an annual (short-term) cashtotal incentive award (Annual Award) for a one-year performance period. Fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award is earned and vested after the last day of the one-year performance period (Year-End Award). The remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award is deferred for a three-year performance period (Deferred Award). The EIP also provides for a one-time incentive award to address a payment gap in long-term executive incentive compensation in 2020 for the performance period from 2017-2019 (Gap Year Award), which arises because of the discontinuation in 2017 of the Bank’s traditional long-term executive incentive plan. The EIP replaces the Bank’s traditional short-term and long-term executive incentive plans as part of the Bank’s overall compensation program and effectively combines short-term and long-term executive incentive programs into one omnibus incentive plan for all senior executive officers.

The EIP is designed to attract and retain senior executive officers and to motivate and focus their efforts on achieving the Bank’s business plan and accomplishing its goals and objectives while maintaining the safety and soundness of the Bank. The EIP is a cash-based incentive plan that provides award opportunities based on achievement of performance goals and the satisfaction of certain qualifiers. The EIP is for the Bank's corporate goals and individual goals tosenior executive officers (specifically for 2017, the Bank's president, (2014 President's Incentive Plan, or 2014 PIP) and to the executive vice president, and each senior vice presidents (2014president, excluding the Chief Audit Executive, Incentive Plan, or 2014 EIP). The 2014 EIP does not apply to the Bank's Director of Internal Audit, who participates in the Bank's Audit Executive Incentive Plan.Plan).
The deferral component of the EIP ties long-term cash incentive rewards to the sustainability of goal achievements over a three-year period, which is intended to, among other things, promote the Bank’s long-term health by deterring behavior or inappropriate risk-taking that could lead to material financial loss to the Bank. Under the Deferred Award provisions of the EIP, payment of fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Award is deferred for a three-year period, during which payment is conditioned upon the satisfaction of certain “qualifiers” that recognize the risk outcomes of executive decision making. Deferred Awards may be reduced or subject to forfeiture if qualifiers are not met during the Deferral Performance Period (defined below).

The EIP provides that the Board will establish award levels prior to each of the performance periods for the Annual Awards and Deferred Awards. A performance period for an Annual Award is the one-calendar-year period over which fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award can be earned and vested, i.e., the Year-End Award, (Annual Performance Period). The related Deferred Award can vest following the three-calendar-year performance period (Deferral Performance Period). For the Gap Year Award, the performance period is the three-year period beginning on January 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2019 (Gap Year Performance Period).

Performance goals and qualifiers are the factors established by the Board for each performance period and are taken into consideration in determining the amount of an award. The Board will define “Threshold,” “Meets,” “Exceeds,” and “Far Exceeds” achievement levels for each performance goal to determine the amount of the award. The Board may adjust the performance goals and qualifiers for any performance period to ensure the purposes of the EIP are served. The EIP provides that in determining the appropriate performance goals and qualifiers, the Board will, among other things: balance risk and financial results in a manner that does not encourage participants to expose the Bank to imprudent risks; make such a determination in a manner designed to ensure that a participant’s overall compensation is balanced and not excessive in amount and that the awards are consistent with the Bank’s policies regarding compensation arrangements; and monitor the success of the performance goals and qualifiers taking into account weighting established in prior years and making appropriate adjustments in the future, as needed, so that payments appropriately incentivize participants, appropriately reflect risk, and align with regulatory guidance.


203



Under the EIP for 2017, the Board established 2017 performance goals for the Annual Award which are the: Risk Management goal, Franchise Enhancement goal, Community Investment goal, and Organizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion goal.

For the 2017 performance goals, the following table shows the goal weights for different categories of officers.
 CEO/EVP/SVPs SVP, Chief Risk Officer
 Corporate Goal Weight
 Goal Weight (includes individual goals)
 Corporate Goal Weight
 Goal Weight (includes individual goals)
IndividualN/A
 10.0% N/A
 10.0%
Risk Management20.0% 18.0% 50.0% 45.0%
Franchise Enhancement40.0% 36.0% 30.0% 27.0%
Community Investment20.0% 18.0% 10.0% 9.0%
Organizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion20.0% 18.0% 10.0% 9.0%
Total100.0% 100.0% 100.0% 100.0%

For the Gap Year Award, executives are rewarded for the achievement of performance goals over a three-year performance period like the Bank’s traditional long-term cash incentive plans (i.e., the Bank’s Executive Performance Unit Plan or EPUP). For the Gap Year Award, the Gap Year Performance Period is from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2019. The Gap Year Award performance goals, which are weighted and measured based on a 3-year average, relate to the (AROCS) and risk management.

The following table shows the performance goals and goal weights for the Gap Year Award.
GoalsGoal Weight
 Threshold
 Meets (Target)
 Exceeds
 Far Exceeds
AROCS Goal (3-Year Average Spread Over Benchmark)30% 2.18% 2.43% 2.68% 2.93%
Risk Management70% Based on the 3-year average of the actual Risk Management goal achievement levels
for 2017, 2018, and 2019

For the EIP for 2017, performance goal measures range from 75% of target (threshold) to 150% of target (far exceeds).

The target achievement levels in the 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP for 2017 were designed to reward officers for achievement of the Bank's corporate goals to accomplish the Bank's missionand objectives as described above, based on a target level of achievement for all corporate goals and the officer's individual goal(s). The exceeds and far exceeds achievement levels were designed to reward officers when the Bank and the individual officer achievements exceed the target level. The plans define the exceeds achievement level asis an optimistic achievement level relative to the target level, and the far exceeds achievement level as the most optimistic achievement level based on reasonable business, market, and economic assumptions and conditions.

Awards under both the 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP were based on the total weighted achievement of the three corporate goals approved by the Board for 2014 (the Risk ManagementThe performance goal the Community Investment goal, and the Franchise Enhancement goal) and one or more individual goals for each officer.

We used a scale of 0% to 150% to measure the achievement levels for the Bank's corporate goals and each executive's individual goal(s), with 75% as the threshold level, 100% as the target level, 125% as the exceeds level, and 150% as the far exceeds level.

Under both the 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP, the Board had discretion to modify goal achievement levels, award determinations, incentive payments, and any awards for achievement below the threshold total weighted achievement level. Both the 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP provided that aggregate performance below the threshold achievement level normally would not result in an incentive award, and both the 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP provided the Board with discretion to modify any and all incentive payments, including, without limit, under the following circumstances: if (i) errors or omissions result in material revisions to the Bank's financial results, information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency, or information used to determine incentive

205


compensation payouts; (ii) if information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency is untimely; or, (iii) if the Bank does not make appropriate progress in the timely remediation of examination, monitoring, or other supervisory findings and matters requiring attention.

The 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP also provided that actual goal achievement levels were subject to adjustment because of changes in financial strategies or policies, any significant change in Bank membership, and other factors determined by the Board. The 2014 PIP and the 2014 EIP also provided that the impact of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges would be excluded from the Adjusted Return on Capital Spread goal achievement level target and performance measurement and the impact of dividend benchmark variances-to-plan would be excluded from the Adjusted Return on Capital Spread goal performance measurement.

President's Incentive Plan. For 2014, we provided the Bank's president with an annual (short-term) cash incentive compensation plan, the 2014 PIP, which rewards the president for the Bank's overall performance and for significantly contributing to and influencing achievement of the Bank's corporate goals and performance targets, as well as for an individual goal.

The 2014 PIP award rangesmeasures and plan design were intended to appropriately motivate and reward the Bank’s presidentsenior executive officers based on the total achievement of all goals, taking into account hiseach senior executive officer’s role in the Bank's performance. The 2014 awardSetting the performance goal measure ranges asbased on a percentage of base salary werefor 2017 is intended to be consistent with our Executive Compensation Philosophy of delivering total cash compensation at target levels generally around the median (50th percentile) of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent.

The following table shows the goal weights for the president in the 2014 PIP.

2014 PIP2014 Goal Weights
Risk Management Goal27%
Community Investment Goal18
Franchise Enhancement Goal45
Individual Goal10
Total100%

The president's awardtotal incentive awards under the 2014 PIP wasEIP are determined by multiplying the percentage of achievement for each goal by the respective goal weights to arrive at the president's total weighted achievement level. The president's total weighted achievement level was then used to determine the president's cash incentive compensation award under the 2014 PIP.
For a discussion regarding the award granted to the president under the 2014 PIP, see the discussion in “Compensation Tables - Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table - Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payments,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.
Executive Incentive Plan. For 2014, we provided an annual (short-term) cash incentive compensation plan, the 2014 EIP, to reward our executive vice president and senior vice presidents (except for the Bank's Director of Internal Audit, who participates in the Bank's Audit Executive Incentive Plan) for the Bank's overall corporate goal achievement and for achievement of their individual goals. The 2014 EIP was designed to reward these senior officers, who are substantially responsible for the Bank's overall performance and who significantly contribute to and influence the achievement of the Bank's corporate goals.
The 2014 EIP award ranges and plan design were intended to appropriately motivate and reward officers based on the total achievement of all goals, taking into account each individual officer's role in the Bank's performance. The 2014 award ranges as a percentage of base salary were intended to be consistent with our Executive Compensation

206


Philosophy of delivering total cash compensation at target levels generally around the median (50th percentile) of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent.
The following table shows the goal weights for different categories of officers in the 2014 EIP.

 2014 Goal Weights
2014 EIP
Executive
Vice President

 
Senior Vice President and
Chief Risk Officer

 
Senior
Vice President

Risk Management Goal27% 54% 27%
Community Investment Goal18% 12.6% 18%
Franchise Enhancement Goal45% 23.4% 45%
Individual Goal10% 10% 10%
Total100% 100% 100%

The awards under the 2014 EIP were determined by multiplying the percentage achievement for each goal by the respective goal weights to arrive at each participating officer's total weighted achievement level. Each participating officer's total weighted achievement level wasis then used to determine each participating officer's cash incentive compensation award under the 2014 EIP.


204



The following table shows the total incentive award opportunities for the Annual Awards and the allocation of the Annual Award opportunities between the Year-End Awards and the Deferred Awards for 2017.

 
Annual Award as % of Compensation
(Base Salary)
 
Year-End Award as % of Compensation
(Base Salary)
 
Deferred Award as % of Compensation
(Base Salary)
 Threshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
 Threshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
 Threshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
CEO/EVP/SVPs40%80%96%100% 20%40%48%50% 20%40%48%50%

The following table shows the total incentive award opportunities for the Gap Year Award.

 Long-Term Incentive Award as a % of Compensation (Base Salary effective February 1, 2017)
PositionThreshold
Meets (Target)
Exceeds
Far Exceeds
CEO/EVP/SVPs20%40%48%50%

Fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award, i.e., the Year-End Award, will become vested on the last day of the Annual Performance Period (as mentioned above) and the remaining fifty percent (50%) of the Annual Award that is treated as the Deferred Award will become vested on the last day of the Deferral Performance Period, provided that the Board determines that the performance goals for the Annual Award are achieved and the qualifiers for the Annual Performance Period are satisfied; and with respect to the Deferred Award only, the qualifiers for the Deferral Performance Period are satisfied. The Gap Year Award will become vested over a three-year Gap Year Performance Period (i.e., beginning on January 1, 2017, and ending on December 31, 2019), to the extent the Board determines the performance goals for the Gap Year Award are achieved and the qualifiers are satisfied.

Vesting of any award is subject to the participant receiving a satisfactory performance rating and being actively employed on the last day of the relevant performance period, except in certain cases such as termination because of death or disability, retirement, reduction in force, department reorganization, or substantial job modification, or termination for “Good Reason” or without “Cause.” In the case of termination of employment because of death or disability, the EIP provides that a Deferred Award will be treated as fully vested as of the date of termination and the relevant pro rata portion of the Annual Award or Gap Year Award will be treated as vested for that portion of the relevant performance period based on the assumption that the Bank would have achieved the applicable performance goals at the target level and satisfied the qualifiers for the relevant performance period. In all other such cases of termination of employment, the EIP provides that a Deferred Award will be treated as fully vested as of the date of termination of employment and the relevant pro rata portion of the Annual Award or Gap Year Award will be treated as vested for that portion of the relevant performance period to the extent determined by the Board that the applicable performance goals are achieved and the qualifiers are satisfied.

If a “Change in Control” occurs prior to the date of vesting of an award, then an Annual Award or Gap Year Award will be paid on a pro rata basis based on the assumption the Bank would have achieved the applicable performance goals at the target level and satisfied the qualifiers for the relevant performance period, while any Deferred Award will be treated as vested effective as of the date of the Change in Control.

The following are the performance qualifiers for 2017 for any awards under the EIP: (i) no submission of material information to a regulatory or a reporting agency is significantly past due; (ii) the Bank makes sufficient progress, as determined by the Board, in the timely remediation of significant examination, monitoring, and other supervisory findings; (iii) no material risk management deficiency exists at the Bank; (iv) no operational errors or omissions result in material revisions to the financial results, information submitted to the Finance Agency, or data used to determine incentive payouts; and (v) the Bank has sufficient capital to pay dividends and the ability to repurchase or redeem capital stock.

The EIP provides that awards may be reduced, eliminated, or forfeited in certain circumstances. Under the EIP, the Board may reduce or eliminate any award not yet paid if the Board finds that a serious, material safety and

205



soundness issue or a serious, material risk management deficiency exists at the Bank, or if: (i) errors or omissions result in material revisions to the Bank’s financial results, information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency, or information used to determine incentive compensation payouts; (ii) information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency is untimely; or, (iii) the Bank does not make appropriate progress, as determined by the Board, in the timely remediation of examination, monitoring, or other supervisory findings and matters requiring attention.

In addition, if the Bank realizes actual losses during the Deferral Performance Period, or other measures or aspects of performance related to the annual Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period are realized that would have caused a reduction in the amount of the final award (i.e., the amount of the earned and vested award that, after any adjustments, is approved by the Board for payment) calculated for the Annual Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period, then the remaining amount of the final award may be reduced to reflect this additional information. Furthermore, if a participant breaches the terms of a non-solicitation and non-disclosure agreement with the Bank executed as a condition to participating in the EIP, all of the participant’s unpaid vested and unvested awards may be forfeited.

Finally, if during the most recent examination of the Bank by the Finance Agency, the Finance Agency identifies an unsafe or unsound practice or condition that is material to the financial operation of the Bank within the participant’s area(s) of responsibility, and such unsafe or unsound practice or condition is not subsequently resolved to the satisfaction of the Board, then all or a portion of a participant’s unpaid award (vested and unvested) may be forfeited as determined in the sole discretion of the Board. Any future payments for a vested award will cease, and the Bank will have no further obligation to make such payments.

The amount of any award will be determined at the sole discretion of the Board. If the qualifiers are satisfied, an annual compounding interest rate of 6% is applied to any Deferred Awards. Awards, if any, under the EIP are to be paid in accordance with the terms of the EIP following Board approval and completion of any required regulatory review.

The amount of any earned and vested Annual Award, Deferred Award, or Gap Year Award may be modified at the Board’s discretion to account for performance that is not captured in the relevant performance goals and qualifiers. The Board, in its discretion, may also consider “extraordinary occurrences” when assessing performance results and determining any of the awards. “Extraordinary Occurrences” mean those events that, in the opinion and discretion of the Board, are outside the significant influence of the participant or the Bank and are likely to have a significant unanticipated effect, whether positive or negative, on the Bank’s operating or financial results.

For a discussionadditional information regarding the awards granted under the 2014 EIP for the named executive officers,2017, see the discussion in “Compensation Tables - Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table - Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payments,Payouts,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.

Traditional Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan: Executive Performance Unit Plan

We provide our president, executive vice president, and senior vice presidents (other than the Director of Internal Audit, who participates in the Audit Performance Unit Plan) aThe Bank’s traditional long-term cash incentive compensation plan is the Executive Performance Unit Plan or EPUP.(EPUP). For 2017, the 2015 EPUP for the performance period 2015 through 2017 and the 2016 EPUP for the performance period 2016 through 2018 were in effect. For 2018, the 2016 EPUP remains in effect. As discussed above, beginning in 2017, the Bank discontinued offering its traditional long-term executive incentive plan (i.e., the EPUPs) and instead included the long-term cash incentive component of the Bank’s compensation program in the EIP.

The EPUP rewardsEPUPs were designed to reward our keysenior executives who are substantially responsible for the Bank's overall long-term performance and who significantly contribute to and influence the Bank's long-term goal achievements, which directly support the Bank's three-year strategic plans. The purpose of the EPUP iswas also to attract and retain outstanding executives as part of a competitive total compensation program.

The EPUP awards are based on three-year performance periods consistent with the Bank's three-year strategic plans. A new three-year performance period is usually established at the beginning
206



The EPUP awards are based on the total weighted achievement level of the three-year average achievement levels of two annual Bank corporate goals during the relevant three-year performance period based on a scale of 0% to 150% for the 2014 EPUP, 2013 EPUP, and the 2012 EPUP,, with 100% as the target achievement level for all performance periods.level. The Bank's corporate goals for the 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs include the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal (weighted at 30%) and the Risk Management goal.goal (weighted at 70%).

The 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs identified specific Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal targets for each achievement level and providedprovide that the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal achievement levels will be based on a comparison of the actual three-year average results with the three-year projected results from the Bank's 2014,

207


2013,2016 and 20122015 Strategic Plans, respectively. They also providedprovide that the Risk Management goal achievement levels will be based on the three-year average of the actual Risk Management goal achievement levels under each of the three annual executive incentive plans in effect during the performance period, and will be measured at the end of the performance period.
The two corporate goals in the 2014, 2013, and 2012 EPUPs were weighted 30% for the Adjusted Return on Capital Spread goal and 70% for the Risk Management goal at all achievement levels.

To calculate an EPUP award, the total weighted achievement level for the two Bank corporate goals is multiplied by the officer's target award percentage (the range of awards as a percentage of base salary, discussed below), which is then multiplied by the officer's base salary in the first year of the three-year performance period.

For the 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs, total weighted achievement levels range from 75% of target (threshold) to 150% of target (far exceeds), and the awards as a percentage of base salary for the president, executive vice president, and senior vice presidents, based on the total weighted achievement level of Bank goals, are as follows: achievement level 150% of target -target: 50% of base salary; achievement level 125% of target -target: 48% of base salary; achievement level 100% of target -target: 40% of base salary; and achievement level 75% of target -target: 20% of base salary.

Under the 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs, performance below the aggregate threshold achievement level normally will not result in an incentive award. The Board has discretion to modify any and all goal achievement levels, award determinations, and incentive payments.payments to account for matters not specifically addressed in the plan. Under the 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs, incentive compensation reductions may be made in, but are not limited to, the following circumstances: (i) if errors or omissions result in material revisions to the Bank's financial results, information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency, or information used to determine incentive compensation payouts; (ii) if information submitted to a regulatory or a reporting agency is untimely; or (iii) if the Bank does not make appropriate progress in the timely remediation of examination, monitoring, or other supervisory findings and matters requiring attention.

The actual achievement of Bank goals for the 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs is subject to adjustment for changes in financial strategies or policies, any significant change in Bank membership, and other factors determined by the Board.

The 2014, 2013,2016 and 20122015 EPUPs provide that the impacts of credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges are excluded from the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal target, but the impacts of actual credit-related other-than-temporary impairment charges are included in the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal performance measurement, and the impacts of dividend benchmark variances-to-plan are excluded from the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal performance measurement.

The potential target award ranges as a percentage of base salary are intended to be consistent with delivering total compensation packages at target levels generally around the median (50th(50th percentile) of the total remuneration in the financial services marketplace from which the Bank recruits executive talent.

The awards under the EPUPs are designed to be based in large part on the executive's ability to affect the Bank's long-term performance. For additional information, see discussion in “Compensation Tables - Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table - Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payments,Payouts,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.

Executive
207



The EPUPs provide that executive officers whose Bank employment is terminated because of voluntary normal retirement, disability, or death may receive a prorated award. AnyIn January 2017, the 2016 and 2015 EPUPs were amended to allow a pro rata portion of any award to be paid upon termination of employment during the relevant performance period due to: (a) “Retirement;” (b) a termination by participant for “Good Reason;” (c) a termination by the Bank without “Cause" due to the elimination of an individual job or position; (d) the elimination of one or more jobs or positions as a result of a reduction in force or department reorganization; or (e) a substantial job modification resulting in the incumbent being, in the judgment of the Bank, unqualified for or unable to perform the revised job. A pro rata portion of a plan award may be paid for the portion of the relevant performance period during which the participant was employed to the extent determined by the Board that the applicable performance metrics are satisfied. The amendments also provide that if a participant incurs a termination of employment during a performance period due to death or disability, a plan award will be paid for the portion of the relevant performance period during which the participant was employed based on the assumption the Bank would have achieved the “Meets” achievement level for the relevant performance period. The amendments further provide that if a “Change in Control” of the Bank occurs prior to the payment date of a plan award, then a final award will be paid on a prorated basis based on the assumption the Bank would have achieved the performance metrics at the “Meets” achievement level for the relevant performance period. The terms “Retirement,” “Good Reason,” “Meets” and “Change in Control” all have the meanings set forth in the EIP.

Except for payments in the case of death, disability or change in control, any awards are paid following Board approval after the end of the three-year performance period and any required regulatory review period.


208


Savings Plan

The Bank's Savings 401(k) Plan (Savings Plan) is a tax-qualified defined contribution 401(k) retirement benefit plan that is available to all eligible employees, including the named executive officers. Each eligible employee may contribute between 2% and 20% of base salary to the Savings Plan. For employees who have completed six months of service, the Bank matches a portion of the employee's contribution (50% for employees with less than three years of service, 75% for employees with at least three years of service but less than five years of service, and 100% for employees following five years of service), up to a maximum of 6% of base salary. Employees are fully vested in employer matching contributions at all times.

For 2014,2017, the maximum annual before-tax employee contribution to the Savings Plan was limited to $17,500$18,000 (or $23,000$24,000 for participants age 50 and over), and no more than $260,000$270,000 of annual compensation could be taken into account in computing an employee's benefits under the Savings Plan.

Cash Balance Plan and the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund

We began offering benefits under the Cash Balance Plan on January 1, 1996. The Cash Balance Plan is a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan that covers employees who have completed a minimum of six months of service, including the named executive officers. Each year, eligible employees accrue benefits equal to 6% of their total annual compensation (which includes base salary and short-term cash incentive compensation) plus interest equal to 6% of their account balances accrued through the prior year, referred to as the annual benefit component of the Cash Balance Plan. For 2014,2017, the Internal Revenue Code (IRC) limited the amount of annual compensation that could be considered in calculating an employee's benefits under the Cash Balance Plan to $260,000.$270,000.

The benefits under the Cash Balance Plan annual benefit component are fully vested after an employee completes three years of service. Vested amounts are generally payable in a lump sum or as an annuity when the employee leaves the Bank.

Prior to offering benefits under the Cash Balance Plan, we participated in the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund or the FIRF.(FIRF). The FIRF is a multiple-employer tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan. We withdrew from the FIRF on December 31, 1995.


208



When we withdrew from the FIRF, benefits earned under the FIRF as of December 31, 1995, were fully vested and the value of those benefits was then frozen. As of December 31, 1995, the FIRF calculated each participant's FIRF benefit based on the participant's then-highest three consecutive years' average pay multiplied by the participant's years of service multiplied by 2%, referred to as the frozen FIRF benefit. Upon retirement, participants will be eligible to receive their frozen FIRF benefits.

In addition, to preserve some of the value of the participant's frozen FIRF benefit, we maintain the ratio of each participant's frozen FIRF age 65 annuity payments to the participant's highest three consecutive years' average pay as of December 31, 1995 (annuity ratio), which we refer to as the net transition benefit component of the Cash Balance Plan. Upon retirement, each participant with a frozen FIRF benefit will receive a net transition benefit under the Cash Balance Plan that equals his or her highest three consecutive years' average pay at retirement multiplied by his or her annuity ratio minus the frozen FIRF benefit.

Benefit Equalization Plan

The Benefit Equalization Plan (BEP) is an unfunded and non-tax-qualified plan that is designed to restore retirement benefits lost under the Savings Plan and Cash Balance Plan because of compensation and benefits limitations imposed on the Savings Plan and the Cash Balance Plan under the IRC.


209


Annual compensation is determined based on the definition of compensation provided in the respective tax-qualified plans. Participation in the BEP is available to all employees, including the named executive officers, whose benefits under the tax-qualified plans are restricted because of the IRC limitations discussed above.

An employee's benefits that would have been credited under the Cash Balance Plan but for the limitations imposed on the plan under the IRC are credited as Supplemental Cash Balance Benefits under the BEP and the credits accrue interest at an annual rate of 6% until distributed. Each year, employees may also elect to defer compensation earned over the IRC compensation limits to the BEP. For each year that a participant makes deferrals to the BEP, if the amount of the Bank's matching contribution to a participant's account under the Savings Plan is limited because of the IRC compensation limitations, then the Bank will credit to the participant's BEP account an amount equal to the lost matching contribution (up to a maximum of 6% of base salary in the aggregate) under the Savings Plan (participant deferrals and Bank matching contributions are referred to herein as Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits). The make-up benefits under the BEP vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Savings Plan and the Cash Balance Plan.

Effective January 1, 2005, in response to IRC Section 409A, we froze the then-existing BEP (now referred to as the Original BEP) and implemented a new BEP conforming to IRC Section 409A and applicable notices and regulations, which changed the participant election process relating to the time and form of benefit payments (referred to herein as the New BEP).

Under the New BEP, a participant's Supplemental Cash Balance Benefits are payable in the form of a lump sum, single life annuity, 50% survivor annuity, or 75% survivor annuity upon termination of employment, a set date or age after termination of employment, becoming disabled after termination of employment, or death. Under the New BEP, a participant's Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits are payable in a lump sum or two to ten annual installments, and payments may commence at termination of employment, retirement, disability, death, or a specific date after termination of employment. In addition, a participant's elections with respect to the time and form of benefit payments are irrevocable unless the election is made 12 months prior to the scheduled distribution date and the new scheduled distribution date is delayed at least five years. If a participant does not elect the time or form of payment, his or her distribution will be a lump sum at termination of employment.

Under the Original BEP, a participant's Supplemental Cash Balance Benefits are paid in a single life annuity commencing at the later of age 65 or termination of employment, unless the participant elects an optional time and form of payment. The optional forms of payment are a lump sum or any other optional form then permitted under the Cash Balance Plan. Under the Original BEP, a participant's Supplemental BEP Savings Benefits are payable in a

209



lump sum or two to ten installments upon retirement, termination of employment, death, or a specific date after termination of employment. Also, a participant can change the time and form of payment for the Supplemental Cash Balance Benefit at any time, but if the election provides for payment prior to age 65, then payment will not be made until 12 months after the date the Bank receives the new written election unless the participant elects an immediate lump sum distribution subject to forfeiture of 10% of the lump sum payment. Similarly, a participant may elect at any time to change the payout schedule of one or more of the participant's Supplemental BEP Savings Benefit accounts, provided that no payments will be made according to the new election until 12 months after the date the Bank receives the new written election, unless the participant elects an immediate lump sum distribution subject to forfeiture of 10% of the lump sum payment.

Participants are permitted to make five separate payout elections (a payout date and form of payment) with respect to the Supplemental BEP Savings Benefit under the Original BEP and under the New BEP.

Deferred Compensation Plan

Our Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP) is an unfunded and non-tax-qualified deferred compensation plan, consisting of three components for employees: (1) employee deferral of current compensation; (2) make-up matching contributions that would have been made by the Bank under the Savings Plan had the base salary compensation not been deferred; and (3) make-up pension benefits that would have been earned under the Cash

210


Balance Plan had any amount of total annual compensation (base salary and short-term cash incentive compensation) not been deferred. See discussion in “Compensation Tables - Narrative to Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.”

The DCP is available to all officers of the Bank, including the named executive officers. Directors are also able to defer their director fees under the DCP. The make-up benefits for employee participants under the DCP vest according to the corresponding provisions of the Savings Plan and the Cash Balance Plan.

Effective January 1, 2005, in response to IRC Section 409A, we froze the then-existing DCP (now referred to as the Original DCP) and implemented a new DCP, conforming to IRC Section 409A, which changed the participant election process related to the time and form of benefit payments (referred to herein as the New DCP).

Under the New DCP, participants' make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits are payable in the form of a lump sum, single life annuity, 50% survivor annuity, or 75% survivor annuity upon termination of employment, a set date or age after termination of employment, becoming disabled after termination of employment, or death. If a participant does not elect a time or form of payment, the benefit is paid in a lump sum upon termination of employment. However, if the participant elects to receive his or her distribution at death and survives to the later of age 70½ or termination of employment, the benefit is paid upon the later of the two events in the form of a lump sum. Only a single time and form of distribution may be elected with respect to both the make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits under the New DCP and the make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits under the New BEP.

A participant's deferred compensation and the Bank's make-up Savings Plan matching contributions credited under the New DCP (including earnings on such amounts) are payable in a lump sum or two to ten annual installments, and payments may commence at termination of employment, retirement, disability, death, or a specific date no earlier than one year from the end of the deferral period. Participant elections with respect to the time and form of Savings Plan-related benefit payments from the New DCP are irrevocable unless the election is made 12 months prior to the scheduled distribution date and the new scheduled distribution date is delayed at least five years. If a participant does not elect the time or form of payment, his or her distribution will be a lump sum at termination of employment.

For participant-deferred compensation and make-up Bank matching contributions credited under the Original DCP, a participant may elect at any time to change the payout schedule of one or more of the participant's accounts, provided that no payments will be made according to the new election until 12 months after the date the Bank

210



receives the new written election unless the participant elects an immediate lump sum distribution subject to forfeiture of 10% of the lump sum payment.

Participants are permitted to make five separate payout elections (a payout date and form of payment) under each of the New DCP and the Original DCP for distribution of participant deferrals and Bank matching contribution credits.

Under the Original DCP, participants' make-up Cash Balance Plan benefits are payable in the same form and at the same time as the participants' related benefits under the Cash Balance Plan.

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

Effective January 1, 2003, we began providing a Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP) to the Bank's senior officers, including the named executive officers. This plan is an unfunded and non-tax-qualified retirement benefit plan that provides a cash balance style benefit to the Bank's senior officers (including the named executive officers) that is in addition to the tax-qualified benefits under the Cash Balance Plan.

The SERP supplements the Cash Balance Plan benefits to provide a competitive postretirement compensation package that is intended to help the Bank attract and retain key senior officers who are critical to the success of the Bank.


211


Benefits under the SERP are based on total annual compensation (base salary and short-term cash incentive compensation, including any deferrals under the Savings Plan, BEP, or DCP) and years of credited service as presented in the table below. In addition, participants accrue annual interest equal to 6% of balances accrued through the prior yearend. In addition, SERP benefits are limited to the extent that any participant's total pension retirement income exceeds fifty percent (50%) of the participant's final average pay. Final average pay is defined as a participant's highest average annual compensation during any three consecutive years during which he or she is a participant in the SERP. Annual benefits accrued under the SERP for any plan year that commenced before January 1, 2018, vest at the earlier of three years after they are earned, five years of employment with the Bank, or when the participant reaches age 62.

Years of Credited Service
(As Defined in the Plan)
Amount of Contribution for President (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)
 Amount of Contribution for Other Participants (Percentage of Total Annual Compensation)
Fewer than 1010% 8%
10 or more but less than 1515% 12%
15 or more20% 16%

The normal form and time of payment of benefits under the SERP is a lump sum upon the earlier of termination of employment, disability, or death. Upon a timely election, a participant may elect an optional formforms of payment to commence after termination of employment as specified in the plan.

No benefits are paid under the SERP if a participant's employment is terminated for cause (as defined in the plan). In addition, if a participant terminates employment priorJanuary 2018, the SERP was amended to age 62,provide that in the final three yearsevent of termination for cause, only the unvested benefits areportion of the participant’s SERP account would be forfeited.

The SERP was also amended in January 2018 to revise: (1) Schedule A to the SERP to provide that beginning with 2018, the amounts of the contribution (Contribution Credit) to be credited to the account of a participant covered by Schedule A to the SERP will be 20% of a participant’s total annual compensation for fewer than five years of credited service (Credited Service) and 25% of a participant’s total annual compensation for five years or more of Credited Service; and (2) Schedule C to the SERP to provide that beginning with 2018, the amounts of the Contribution Credit to be credited to the account of a participant in Schedule C will be 25% of a participant’s total annual compensation for fewer than five years of Credited Service and 35% of a participant’s total annual compensation for five years or more of Credited Service. Annual benefits accrued under the SERP for any plan year

211



commencing after January 1, 2018, will vest at the earlier of five years of employment with the Bank or when the participant reaches age 62. The Bank’s senior officers, including the named executive officers, are participants in Schedule A and the president and chief executive officer is a participant in Schedule C. At the same time, the SERP was also amended to provide the Board with discretionary authority for approving special contribution credits (Special Contribution Credits), which are additional credits to a participant’s account in an amount that may not exceed the participant’s target annualized compensation plus target Deferred Award and Gap Year Award under the EIP and any other long-term incentive compensation (the “pay limitation”) for the applicable calendar year. At any time, no more than three Special Contribution Credits may be approved for a single participant, and the pay limitation for each participant is adjusted annually for annual increases in the participant’s target compensation and long-term incentive pay. The Special Contribution Credits are not subject to the SERP’s total retirement income limitation described above.

Other Elements of Compensation

We provide to all employees, including the named executive officers, health, dental, and vision insurance, and an employee assistance program for the employees and their spouses/partners and children, for which we pay approximately 80% of the premiums and the employee pays approximately 20%. In addition, we provide long-term disability and basic life insurance coverage to all employees at no cost to the employees.

The Bank makes available limited retiree health care benefits for eligible employees who retire from the Bank. To be classified as a Bank retiree eligible to enroll for retiree health care benefits, a Bank employee must be 55 years of age with a minimum of 10 years of Bank service on the date that his or her employment with the Bank terminates.

Perquisites

On occasion, the Bank may pay for resort activities for employees, including our named executive officers, in connection with business-related meetings; and in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses/partners accompanying employees to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. The president and chief executive officer receives use of a Bank-owned vehicle and its designated building parking space. Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid to the provider of the perquisites.


212



COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT

The EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee (Compensation Committee) acts as the compensation committee on behalf of the Bank's Board of Directors. In fulfilling its oversight responsibilities, the Compensation Committee reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis set forth in this annual report on Form 10-K.

Based on the Compensation Committee's review of the Compensation Discussion and Analysis and the discussions the Compensation Committee has had with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to the Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this annual report on Form 10-K, which will be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee
Scott C. Syphax,John T. Wasley, Chair
Bradley W. Beal, Vice Chair
Steven R. Gardner
Melinda Guzman
Simone LagomarsinoJoan C. Opp
Robert F. Nielsen
John T. WasleyScott C. Syphax


213



COMPENSATION TABLES

Summary Compensation Table
                    
(In whole dollars)                    
Name and Principal PositionYear Salary
 
Non-Equity
Incentive
Payment(1)

 
Non-Equity
LTIP Payout(2)

 
Change in
Pension Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation(3)

 
All Other
Compensation(4)(5)

 Total
Year Salary
 
Bonus (1)

Non-Equity
Incentive
Payment(2)

Non-Equity
LTIP Payout(3)

Change in
Pension Value and
Non-Qualified
Deferred
Compensation(4)

 
All Other(5)(6)
Compensation

 Total
Dean Schultz2014 $828,000
 $359,200
 $390,900
 $67,313
 $61,644
 $1,707,057
J. Gregory Seibly(7)
2017 $850,000
 $300,000
$418,900
$217,800
$590,814
 $29,149
 $2,406,663
President and2013 811,800
 399,200
 655,500
 414,378
 61,104
 2,341,982
2016 506,665
 
297,600
99,100
335,768
 447,105
(8) 
1,686,238
Chief Executive Officer2012 795,900
 390,500
 374,900
 665,480
 65,082
 2,291,862
        
                    
Lisa B. MacMillen(9)2014 530,400
 233,300
 250,400
 468,647
 39,644
 1,522,391
2017 188,541
(10) 

67,150
197,900

(11) 
567,813
(12) 
1,021,404
Executive Vice President and2013 520,000
 255,700
 335,900
 113,431
 39,421
 1,264,452
2016 557,200
 
275,200
262,800
193,400
 39,893
 1,328,493
Chief Operating Officer2012 509,800
 250,700
 192,100
 480,433
 50,410
 1,483,443
2015 546,300
 22,763
270,100
256,300
49,211
 40,295
 1,184,969
                   

Kenneth C. Miller2017 466,533
 
229,900
214,900
293,857
 37,017
 1,242,207
Senior Vice President and2016 458,100
 
227,200
214,000
236,083
 37,239
 1,172,622
Chief Financial Officer2015 444,800
 18,533
219,900
208,600
202,885
 35,534
 1,130,252
       

Lawrence H. Parks2014 452,691
(6) 
188,300
 202,100
 448,011
 32,109
 1,323,211
2017 484,605
(13) 

227,850
213,000
322,988
 34,047
 1,282,490
Senior Vice President,2013 439,772
(7) 
206,300
 237,100
 10,087
 34,686
 927,945
2016 478,009
(14) 

225,200
212,100
169,090
 33,601
 1,118,000
External and Legislative Affairs2012 431,178
(8) 
202,700
 135,600
 445,891
 37,055
 1,252,424
2015 461,376
(15) 
18,367
217,900
206,800
184,575
 32,703
 1,121,721
                   

Suzanne Titus-Johnson2014 383,600
 168,700
 181,100
 388,905
 31,679
 1,153,984
2017 454,337
(16) 

204,250
190,900
382,333
 33,063
 1,264,883
Senior Vice President and2013 376,100
 184,900
 212,600
 230,176
 32,448
 1,036,224
2016 422,653
(17) 

201,900
190,100
233,358
 33,092
 1,081,103
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary2012 368,700
 181,700
 116,600
 338,766
 40,926
 1,046,692
General Counsel and2015 395,100
 116,463
195,300
185,300
122,730
 31,914
 1,046,807
Corporate Secretary        
                   

Kenneth C. Miller2014 431,800
 186,500
 203,800
 261,675
 35,448
 1,119,223
Stephen P. Traynor(18)
2017 419,292
 
199,700
190,400
255,726
 32,952
 1,098,070
Senior Vice President and2013 423,300
 208,100
 227,900
 139,169
 36,094
 1,034,563
       

Chief Financial Officer2012 415,000
 204,600
 130,300
 279,982
 35,991
 1,065,873
            
David H. Martens2014 385,788
(9) 
170,000
 175,400
 225,329
 31,745
 988,262
Senior Vice President and2013 392,214
(10) 
178,800
 205,900
 124,398
 40,110
 941,422
Chief Risk Officer2012 357,100
 176,200
 117,700
 233,719
 33,525
 918,244
Chief Banking Officer       


(1)Represents awards earnedThe amount for Mr. Seibly in 2017 represents payment of a sign-on bonus in accordance with his employment agreement. The amounts in 2015 represent a Board-approved special award, consisting of an amount equal to one additional semi-monthly paycheck for all Bank employees to recognize Bankwide teamwork and its contribution to the Bank’s exceptional overall performance in 2015. In addition, the amount for Ms. Titus-Johnson in 2015 represents a $100,000 discretionary cash incentive compensation award under the 2014, 2013, and 2012 PIPs and EIPs. See discussion in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program - Short-Term Cash Incentive Plans: President's Incentive Plan and Executive Incentive Plan.”2015 EIP.
(2)Represents the Year-End Awards in 2017 earned and vested under the EIP for 2017, awards in 2016 earned under the 2012, 2011,2016 President’s Incentive Plan and 2010 EPUPs. See2016 Executive Incentive Plan, and awards earned in 2015 under the 2015 Executive Incentive Plan. For the Year-End Awards in 2017 under the EIP for 2017, see the discussion in “Compensation Discussion“Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Analysis - ElementsGrants of Our Executive Compensation Program -Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan: Executive Performance Unit Plan.Payouts.
(3)Represents awards earned under the 2015, 2014, and 2013 EPUPs. For the awards in 2017 under the 2015 EPUP, see the discussion in “Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table – Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive Payouts.”
(4)Represents the aggregate change in actuarial present value of each of the named executive officers' accumulated benefits under the Bank's qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans (Cash Balance Plan; frozen FIRF, if applicable; restored pension benefit under the Benefit Equalization Plan;Plan (BEP); make-up pension benefit under the Deferred Compensation Plan;Plan (DCP); and Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan)Plan (SERP)). The aggregate change in actuarial present value is determined by certain factors, including the applicable discount rate used to determine the present value and the benefit limitations imposed by the plans. There are no above-market or preferential earnings on the named executive officers' Deferred Compensation PlanDCP accounts.
(4)(5)Includes perquisites and premiums for disability and life insurance paid by the Bank. On occasion, the Bank pays for resort activities for employees in connection with Board meetings and other business-related meetings,meetings; and, in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses accompanying employees to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. The President receives use of a Bank-owned vehicle and its designated building parking space. Perquisites are valued at the actual amounts paid to the provider of the perquisites. The value of some perquisites is not reasonably quantifiable, but is known to be de minimis.
(5)(6)Includes the Bank'sBank’s matching contributions under the Savings Plan and the Bank'sBank’s restored and make-up matching amounts credited under the Benefit Equalization PlanBEP and Deferred Compensation Plan.DCP.
(6)(7)Mr. Seibly became president and chief executive officer effective May 12, 2016.
(8)Of this amount, $24,691$224,791 represents reimbursement of relocation costs to Mr. Seibly, and $217,135 represents the related tax gross-ups to Mr. Seibly.
(9)Ms. MacMillen served as chief operating officer until March 31, 2017.
(10)Of this amount, $49,241 represents a vacation cash-out payment.

214



(11)In accordance with SEC rules, negative changes in pension value are not included in this table. The negative change in pension value for Ms. MacMillen is $188,233 which primarily results from payments from the BEP, DCP and the SERP.
(12)Of this amount, $557,200 represents a severance payment.
(13)Of this amount, $22,264 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(7)(14)Of this amount, $20,172$24,009 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(8)(15)Of this amount, $19,778$20,576 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(9)(16)Of this amount, $14,288$39,912 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(10)(17)Of this amount, $28,014$15,653 represents a vacation cash-out payment.
(18)Mr. Traynor who previously served as Senior Vice President, Member Financial Services and Community Investment, became Chief Banking Officer in March 2017.




214


Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards
            
(In whole dollars) 
Estimated Payout Ranges(1)
 
Estimated Payout Ranges(1)
NamePlan Plan Period Payout Date Threshold
 Target
 Maximum
EIP for 2017 Plan Period Payout Date Threshold
 Target
 Maximum
Dean Schultz2014 EPUP 2014-2016 February 2017 $165,600
 $331,200
 $414,000
J. Gregory Seibly

Year-End Award 2017 February 2018 $170,000
 $340,000
 $425,000
2014 PIP 2014 February 2015 165,600
 331,200
 414,000
Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 170,000
 340,000
 425,000
Lisa B. MacMillen2014 EPUP 2014-2016 February 2017 106,100
 212,200
 265,200
Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 170,000
 340,000
 425,000
Lisa B. MacMillen(2)
Year-End Award 2017 February 2018 27,478
 54,957
 68,696
Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 27,478
 54,957
 68,696
Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 9,159
 18,319
 22,899
Kenneth C. MillerYear-End Award 2017 February 2018 93,460
 186,920
 233,650
Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 93,460
 186,920
 233,650
2014 EIP 2014 February 2015 106,100
 212,200
 265,200
Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 93,460
 186,920
 233,650
Lawrence H. Parks2014 EPUP 2014-2016 February 2017 85,600
 171,200
 214,000
Year-End Award 2017 February 2018 92,620
 185,240
 231,550
2014 EIP 2014 February 2015 85,600
 171,200
 214,000
Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 92,620
 185,240
 231,550
Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 92,620
 185,240
 231,550
Suzanne Titus-Johnson2014 EPUP 2014-2016 February 2017 76,700
 153,400
 191,800
Year-End Award 2017 February 2018 83,020
 166,040
 207,550
2014 EIP 2014 February 2015 76,700
 153,400
 191,800
Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 83,020
 166,040
 207,550
Kenneth C. Miller2014 EPUP 2014-2016 February 2017 86,400
 172,700
 215,900
2014 EIP 2014 February 2015 86,400
 172,700
 215,900
Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 83,020
 166,040
 207,550
David H. Martens2014 EPUP 2014-2016 February 2017 74,300
 148,600
 185,800
Stephen P. TraynorYear-End Award 2017 February 2018 81,180
 162,360
 202,950
2014 EIP 2014 February 2015 74,300
 148,600
 185,800
Deferred Award 2018-2020 February 2021 81,180
 162,360
 202,950
Gap Year Award 2017-2019 February 2020 81,180
 162,360
 202,950

(1)The estimated payouts for the 2017 Year-End Awards represent 50% of the Annual Award under the EIP for 2017 that could have been earned by the respective executive officers for 2017. Actual amounts of the Year-End Awards earned and vested under the EIP for 2017 are included in the Summary Compensation Table. Estimated payouts for the 2014 EPUPDeferred Awards represent 50% of the Annual Award under the EIP for 2017 that could be vested by the respective executive officers at the end of the three-year deferral performance periodperiod. Estimated payouts for the Gap Year Award under the EIP are what could be earned at the end of the three-year performance period and are calculated using the base salaries in effect at the beginning of each performance period. Awards, if any, under the 2014 EPUP are payable following the end of the three-year performance periodperiod. Any Gap Year Award is subject to the achievement of performance goals and satisfaction of certain qualifiers, and any Deferred Award under the EIP is subject to the satisfaction of certain qualifiers. Both of the Deferred Award and Gap Year Award are payable following the completion of regulatory review. See discussion in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis - Elements of Ourour Executive Compensation Program - Long-Term Cash– Executive Incentive Plan: Executive Performance Unit Plan.” The payouts
(2)Year-End Awards, Deferred Awards, and Gap Year Awards, if any, for the 2014 PIP and EIPsMs. MacMillen are the amounts that could have been earned by the respective executive officers for 2014. Actual amounts earned under the 2014 PIP and 2014 EIP are included in the Summary Compensation Table.prorated.

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Non-Equity Incentive Plan-Based Awards Table

At Will Employees

All employees of the Bank are “at will” employees, including the named executive officers. The named executive officers may resign at any time, and the Bank may terminate their employment at any time, for any reason or no reason, with or without cause and with or without notice.

The 20152017 base salaries as of December 31, 2017, for the current named executive officers were as follows: J. Gregory Seibly, $850,000; Kenneth C. Miller, $467,300; Lawrence H. Parks, $463,100; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $415,100; and Stephen P. Traynor, $423,151. For 2018, the base salaries of the current named executive officers are

215


Table of Contents

as follows: Dean Schultz, $828,000; Lisa B. MacMillen, $530,400;J. Gregory Seibly, $900,000; Kenneth C. Miller, $481,319; Lawrence H. Parks, $428,000;$476,993; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $383,600; Kenneth C. Miller, $431,800;$427,553; and David H. Martens, $371,500.Stephen P. Traynor, $435,846.

Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy. The Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy (Senior Officers' Policy) is applicable to the president, executive vice president, and senior vice presidents. The Senior Officers' Policy provides severance benefits in the event that the employee's employment is terminated because the employee's job or position is eliminated or because the job or position is substantially modified so that the employee is no longer qualified or cannot perform the revised job. For these officers, severance under the Senior Officers' Policy is equal to the greater of (i) 12 weeks of the officer's base salary, or (ii) the sum of three weeks of the officer's base salary, plus three weeks of the officer's base salary for each full year of service and three weeks of base salary prorated for each partial year of service at the Bank to a maximum of 52 weeks of base salary. The Senior Officers' Policy also provides one month of continued health and life insurance benefits and, at the Bank's discretion, outplacement assistance.

The Senior Officers' Policy also provides severance payments in connection with a “Change in Control” (as defined by the Senior Officers' Policy). Under the Senior Officers' Policy, in the event the president or the executive vice president experiences a termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control, severance and benefits will be payable pursuant to the Agreements described below.


215


The Senior Officers' Policy provides that in the event a senior vice president is involuntarily terminated without “Cause” under certain circumstances or voluntarily terminated with “Good Reason” (as defined by the Senior Officers' Policy) in connection with a Change in Control, upon the Bank's timely receipt of a separation agreement and release, these executive officers will receive severance pay in a lump sum equal to one year of base salary.

In addition, under the Senior Officers' Policy, in the event of a qualifying termination in connection with a Change in Control, each senior vice president will be entitled to continued health and life insurance coverage under the Bank's group health and life insurance policies, at the Bank's expense, for a period of 12 months immediately following the effective date of separation. However, the Bank will immediately cease paying such premiums prior to the end of the 12-month period if the executive officer accepts employment with another employer that provides comparable benefits in terms of cost and scope of coverage during the 12-month period. If the Bank is not in compliance with any applicable regulatory capital or regulatory leverage requirement or if any of the payments required to be made to senior vice presidents pursuant to the Senior Officers' Policy would cause the Bank to fall below such applicable regulatory requirements, such payment will be delayed until the Bank achieves compliance with its regulatory capital requirements.

The Senior Officers' Policy also provides that, in the event the former executive vice president experienced a termination of employment in connection with a Change in Control, severance and benefits would have been payable pursuant to a Change in Control Severance Agreement, described below.

The Board believes that the level of severance benefits for each named executive officer is appropriate because it is reasonable to believe that finding a comparable position at another institution at a comparable compensation level could take up to one year, and possibly longer, depending on the economic environment at the time, and that the distraction of this uncertainty may have a detrimental impact on the executive's performance. If the employment of any of the current named executive officers had been terminated on December 31, 2014,2017, because the employee's job or position had been eliminated or because the job or position had been substantially modified so that the employee was no longer qualified or could not perform the revised job, the approximate value of the severance benefits payable to the executive (subject to Finance Agency regulatory review) applying the Senior Officers’ Policy would have been as follows: Dean Schultz, $830,098; Lisa B. MacMillen, $533,266;J. Gregory Seibly, $199,273; Kenneth C. Miller, $470,465; Lawrence H. Parks, $429,056;$464,242; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $386,474; Kenneth C. Miller, $434,691;$418,255; and David H. Martens, $373,496.Stephen P. Traynor, $426,289.

Change in Control Agreements.Agreement. The Board had approved a Change in Control Severance AgreementsAgreement for the president and chief executive officer, Dean Schultz, and theformer executive vice president and chief operating officer, Lisa B. MacMillen (Agreements). The Agreements became effective as of June 1, 2011. Each Agreement providesMacMillen. This agreement provided for a severance payment and continued benefits if the executive'sexecutive terminated her employment terminates under certain circumstancesfor “Good Reason” (as defined in the agreement) in connection with a “Change in Control” (as defined in the Agreements)agreement) of the Bank. In particular, under the terms of each executive's Agreement, if the executive terminates his or her employment for “Good Reason” (as defined in the Agreements), he or she shall bewould have been entitled to receive, in lieu of any severance benefits to which the executive may otherwise be entitled under any severance plan or program of the Bank, the following: (i) the executive's fully earned but unpaid base salary through the date of termination (together with all other amounts and benefits to which the executive iswas entitled under any benefit plan or practice of the Bank other than the Bank's Senior Officers' Policy); (ii) severance

216



pay in an amount equal to the sum of two times the executive's annual base salary plus two times the executive's “Annual Incentive Amounts” (as defined in the Agreements)agreement); (iii) continued health and life insurance coverage for up to 180 days after the first anniversary of the date of termination of the executive's employment (or if earlier, the date the executive accepts employment from an employer with comparable benefits); and (iv) executive-level outplacement services at the Bank's expense, not to exceed $25,000. If

Employment Agreement. In April 2016, the Bank is not in complianceentered into an employment agreement with Mr. Seibly with an initial term of three years and one-year terms thereafter, unless terminated at any applicable regulatory capitaltime by either the Bank or regulatory leverage requirement or if anyMr. Seibly. Under the terms of the payments requiredagreement, Mr. Seibly initially received a base annual salary of $800,000 and a sign-on payment of $600,000 to be made pursuant to items (ii) or (iv) above would causereceived in two equal installments within 30 days of each of the Bank to fall below such applicable regulatory requirements, the payment will be delayed until the Bank achieves compliance with its regulatory capital requirements. Had the employmentfirst and second anniversaries of Mr. Schultz or Ms. MacMillen beenSeibly’s employment start date, and subject to clawback in certain circumstances. The base annual salary is subject to review at the Board’s discretion. The employment agreement provides for a severance payment equal to (i) two times his “Base Salary” (as defined in his employment agreement); and (ii) two times his “Annual Incentive Amounts” (as defined in his employment agreement) and continued benefits if Mr. Seibly’s employment is terminated under certain circumstances in connection with a “Change in Control” (as defined in his employment agreement) of the Bank. Had Mr. Seibly’ s employment been terminated in connection with a Change in Control on December 31, 2014,2017, the approximate value of the benefits, excluding amounts of any executive-level outplacement services, payable to Mr. Seibly would have been $2,561,241.

Mr. Seibly is also eligible to participate in the Bank’s various executive incentive and employee benefit plans, including the Bank’s SERP, 2016 President’s Incentive Plan, and the 2014-2016, 2015-2017, and 2016-2018 EPUPs. Under Mr. Seibly’s employment agreement, the years of credited service and the amount of Bank contribution credits under the SERP, prior to its amendment effective January 2018, were as follows: 10% of total annual compensation for less than 4 years of credited service; 15% of total annual compensation for 4 or more years but less than 9 years of credited service; and 20% of total annual compensation for 9 or more years of credited service. In addition, Mr. Seibly’s employment agreement provides that he will receive a supplemental SERP contribution credit in the amount of $600,000, to be credited in three equal installments over two years, with the first installment credited at the time his employment began and the second and third installments credited on the first and second anniversaries of his employment commencement, respectively. These supplemental SERP contribution credits will vest immediately when credited. Mr. Seibly’s employment agreement also provides for reimbursement of his relocation cost up to $250,000 and payment to the appropriate taxing authorities of up to $220,000 of any relocation tax obligations.

The employment agreement also provides that if Mr. Seibly’s employment is terminated due to the expiration of the initial three-year term and the Board decides not to extend his employment for any additional term, Mr. Seibly shall be entitled to receive a severance payment equal to twelve (12) months of base salary and a pro-rata portion of the president’s incentive plan (Severance Payment). The employment agreement further provides that if Mr. Seibly is terminated without “Cause” (as defined in his employment agreement) or if he terminates his employment for “Good Reason” (as defined in his employment agreement) any time during the initial three-year term, Mr. Seibly shall be entitled to receive severance payments equal to: the Severance Payment; all “Accrued Benefits” (as defined in his employment agreement); and all unpaid sign-on benefits. Had Mr. Seibly terminated his employment under these circumstances on December 31, 2017, the approximate value of the benefits, payable to Mr. Schultz and Ms. MacMillen (subject to Finance Agency regulatory review)Seibly, excluding amounts of any Accrued Benefits, would have been $2,596,897 and $1,689,988, respectively.$1,568,900. In the event Mr. Seibly receives any severance benefits under the Senior Officers’ Policy, any severance payments to be payable to Mr. Seibly under his employment agreement shall be reduced by such severance benefits received under the Senior Officers’ Policy.


216

Table of Contents

Non-Equity Incentive Payments and Non-Equity Long-Term Incentive PaymentsPayouts

For 2014, Dean Schultz,2017, J. Gregory Seibly, president and chief executive officer, was awarded a cash incentive compensation awardYear-End Award under the 2014 President'sExecutive Incentive Plan (2014 PIP)(EIP) of $359,200.$418,900. Mr. Schultz'sSeibly’s award was based on the Bank's 20142017 achievement level of 81.6%of: 138% for the Risk Management goal; 144% for the Franchise Enhancement goal, 150%goal; 150.0% for the Community Investment goal,goal; and 125.0%125% for the Risk ManagementOrganizational Health/Diversity and Inclusion goal, and his 20142017 achievement level for his individual goal.

217


Table of Contents

    
Based on the achievement levels for the Bank's threefour corporate goals and the achievement levels of named executive officers for their respective individual goals, the following awardsYear-End Awards under the 2014 EIP for 2017 were made: Lisa B. MacMillen, $233,300;$67,150 (prorated from January 1, 2017, to March 31, 2017); Kenneth C. Miller, $229,900; Lawrence H. Parks, $188,300;$227,850; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $168,700; Kenneth C. Miller, $186,500;$204,250; and David H. Martens, $170,000.Stephen P. Traynor $199,700.

The Year-End award amounts above reflect fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Awards approved by the Board under the EIP for 2017. The payment of the other fifty percent (50%) of the total Annual Award, i.e., the Deferred Award, is deferred for the three-year performance period and is subject to applicable qualifiers as described in “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Elements of Our Executive Compensation Program – Executive Incentive Plan,” which discussion is herein incorporated by reference.

The following table shows the two components of the Annual Awards for the named executive officers approved by the Board under the EIP for 2017.

 EIP for 2017
Named Executive Officers
Yearend Awards(1)

 
Deferred Awards(2)

 Annual Awards
J. Gregory Seibly$418,900
 $418,900
 $837,800
Lisa B. MacMillen(3)
67,150
 67,150
 134,300
Kenneth C. Miller229,900
 229,900
 459,800
Lawrence H. Parks227,850
 227,850
 455,700
Suzanne Titus-Johnson204,250
 204,250
 408,500
Stephen P. Traynor199,700
 199,700
 399,400
Total    $2,695,500

(1)The Year-End Award is 50 percent of the Annual Award and included in the Summary Compensation Table.
(2)The Deferred Award is 50 percent of the Annual Award and remain subject to the satisfaction of applicable qualifiers and will not be paid until 2021. The Deferred Awards are also subject to modification and forfeiture under the terms of the EIP.
(3)Ms. MacMillen’s awards are prorated.

In reviewing the Bank's 20142017 performance, the Board recognized the president'spresident’s leadership and the other named executive officers' management in addressing risk management, business, risk, operations,financial, operational efficiency, and regulatory challenges and public policy issues, as well as challenging market conditionswhile achieving all performance goals and objectives at a challenging regulatoryvery high level. With respect to Mr. Seibly in particular, the Board recognized the president’s achievements with respect to his efforts in connection with enhancing constituent relations, the commitment to safe and sound practices, financial management practices, and employee engagement. Last, the Board acknowledged the president’s efforts in creating a Bank culture committed to operational and financial efficiency and effectiveness.

The Risk Management goal, which consisted of two goal components (technology resiliency and business continuity/crisis management), was measured at an aggregate achievement level of 138%. In determining the level of achievement for the first component, the Board recognized management's accomplishments and achievements in migrating the Bank’s environment throughout 2014.to the new data centers and efforts in rolling out the Bank’s end-user computing modernization initiative in a safe and sound manner. With respect to the second goal component, achievement was based on management enhancing the Bank’s recovery resilience by further maturing the Bank’s enterprise crisis management framework through increased crisis team member preparedness, along with continued integration of Information Services Disaster Recovery and Information Security incident response protocols to ensure a cohesive recovery. In particular, the Board recognized that the president and other executive officers implemented several initiatives to enhance the Bank's risk management and operations while delivering strong financial and community investment results.

With respect to the Risk Management goal, which was measured at an achievementBank’s level of 125.0%, the Board recognized management's accomplishments in benchmarking the operations, model,achievement through completion of crisis management team exercises and cyber security risk management programs and functions to industry and regulatory standards, with appropriate adjustments considering cost and effectiveness. In particular, the achievement level was based on: the Bank’s success in benchmarking the Bank’s operations risk management program to the Finance Agency guidance and other operations risk functions and making enhancements to the operations risk section of the Bank’s Risk Management Policy and Enterprise Risk Assessment Methodology and Process Guide. In addition, the Board recognized management’s achievements in: collaborative efforts in developing and maintaining the Operational Event Reporting System; conducting an Anti-Money Laundering risk assessment; designing and implementing a Fraud and Operations Risk Program; conducting a 2013 COSO internal control framework gap assessment; modifying the Bank’s Strategic Vendor Policy to address strategic vendors that rely on third parties or subcontractors; performing a records management program maturity assessment; proposing and implementing Board-level and management-level model risk management policies and procedures; and collaborative efforts in assessing the cyber security risk and threat landscape for the Bank and identifying technology, tools, and controls that should mitigate certain threats.response team exercises.

The Bank's Franchise Enhancement goal, which consisted of fivethree goal components, was measured at an aggregate achievement level of 81.6%144%. The Board recognized the Bank's financial performance in 20142017 for the financial performance goal component (which excluded the impact of other-than-temporary impairment charges, litigation settlements gains, and contributions made in connection with the Bank’s Quality Jobs Initiative), and the

218


Table of Contents

achievements relating to the Bank’s advancesoperating cost efficiency and letters of credit volumethe member business goal component and letters of credit conversions goal component.components. With respect to the financial performance goal component, the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal target level for 20142017 was 4.05%3.06% and the Bank achieved a spread of 4.31%3.95% (net of adjustments). AlthoughFor the operating cost efficiency goal component, the Bank exceededtook several organizational actions to reduce run-rate operating expenses and improve organizational and operational efficiency, including significant restructuring of the financial performance goal measureBank’s leadership team and far exceeded bothreporting structure to broaden leadership span-of-control and sharpen role clarity. Regarding the advances and letters of credit volume goal measure and letters of credit conversions goal measure, the aggregate achievement level for the Bank's Franchise Enhancement goal was offset by the failure to achieve the goal target in the technology initiativemember business goal component, the Board noted the Bank’s achievements in slowing the pace of advances runoff as well as increasing the use of Bank credit to help offset maturing advances to large and former members; and the goal target inBank’s implementation of a program to elevate and expand the Mortgage Partnership Finance program goal component.level of contact with members and prospective members, which has helped promote the Bank as a valued business partner.

The Board further noted the Bank's strong performance againston its Community Investment goal, which was measured at an achievement level of 150%150.0% for 2014.2017. The Bank far exceeded the two goal components in the Community Investment goal to increase supportfocused on the number of community investment activities.members using the CIP and ACE Program or participating in the AHEAD Program.

The Organizational Health and Diversity/Inclusion goal was measured at an achievement level of 125%. The Board noted the Bank’s achievements in workforce and supplier diversity training and the development and implementation of a supplier program, and successfully planning and holding diversity events and activities during 2017.

For the 20122015 EPUP, covering the three-year period 20122015 through 2014,2017, long-term cash incentive compensation awards to the named executive officers were based on the achievement levels for the Bank's Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal and Risk Management goal over the three-year performance period from 20122015 through 2014.2017. The overall achievement level for the goals over this period was 139%147%, reflecting the effect of above-target performance on the Adjusted Returnadjusted return on Capital Spreadcapital spread goal in 2012, 2013,2015, 2016, and 2014.2017. The target level for the three-

217

Table of Contents

yearthree-year period 20122015 through 20142017 was 2.11%2.84%, and the Bank achieved a spread of 3.44%3.72% (net of adjustments)., which represents 150% achievement. The overall achievement level also reflected an achievement level for the Risk Management goal component of 134%146%, which was the average of the actual Risk Management goal achievement levels under the 2012, 2013,2015 and 2014 annual short-term cash incentive compensation plans.2016 Executive Incentive Plans and the EIP for 2017.

The awards approved by the Board under the 20122015 EPUP were as follows: Dean Schultz, $390,900;J. Gregory Seibly, $217,800 (prorated); Lisa B. MacMillen, $250,400;$197,900 (prorated); Kenneth C. Miller, $214,900; Lawrence H. Parks, $202,100;$213,000; Suzanne Titus-Johnson, $181,100; Kenneth C. Miller, $203,800;$190,900; and David H. Martens, $175,400.Stephen P. Traynor, $190,400.

Pension Benefits Table

The following table provides the present value of accumulated pension and pension-related benefits payable as of December 31, 2014,2017, to each of the named executive officers upon the normal retirement age of 65 under the Bank's qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans.


218219


Table of Contents


(In whole dollars)            
NamePlan Name 
Years of
Credited
Service

 
Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefits(1)

 
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year

Plan Name 
Years of
Credited
Service

 
Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefits(1)

 
Payments
During Last
Fiscal Year

Dean SchultzCash Balance Plan 29.750
 $538,429
 $
J. Gregory Seibly

Cash Balance Plan 1.083
 $26,660
 $
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 11.000
 489,544
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund N/A
 
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 29.750
 3,350,863
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 1.083
 93,654
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 29.750
 70,704
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 1.083
 
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.000
 2,157,550
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 1.583
 806,268
 
            
Lisa B. MacMillen(3)Cash Balance Plan 28.417
 561,222
 
Cash Balance Plan 30.667
 713,941
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 9.417
 143,256
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 30.667
 
 642,885
Deferred Compensation Plan 30.667
 775,067
 136,823
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 14.250
 
 871,249
      
Kenneth C. MillerCash Balance Plan 22.917
 600,318
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 9.417
 122,555
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 0.917
 26,244
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 28.417
 1,030,136
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 22.917
 434,932
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 28.417
 419,324
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 22.917
 22,315
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.000
 1,095,605
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 15.000
 1,507,771
 
            
Lawrence H. ParksCash Balance Plan 17.333
 499,060
 
Cash Balance Plan 20.333
 630,000
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund N/A
 
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund N/A
 
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 17.333
 403,288
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 20.333
 535,462
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 17.333
 92,366
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 20.333
 127,836
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.000
 1,317,766
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 15.000
 1,695,835
 
            
Suzanne Titus-JohnsonCash Balance Plan 28.333
 738,879
 
Cash Balance Plan 31.333
 918,724
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 9.333
 129,397
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 9.333
 150,373
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 28.333
 709,905
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 31.333
 890,021
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 28.333
 36,125
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 31.333
 150,200
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 9.750
 918,748
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.750
 1,162,157
 
            
Kenneth C. MillerCash Balance Plan 19.917
 481,196
 
Stephen P. TraynorCash Balance Plan 22.250
 610,143
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 0.917
 23,964
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund 0.250
 5,412
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 19.917
 314,720
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 22.250
 238,107
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 19.917
 19,643
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 22.250
 161,619
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.000
 1,019,231
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 15.000
 1,524,867
 
      
David H. MartensCash Balance Plan 18.167
 410,633
 
Financial Institutions Retirement Fund N/A
 
 
Benefit Equalization Plan 18.167
 210,551
 
Deferred Compensation Plan 18.167
 60,563
 
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan(2)
 12.000
 934,743
 

(1)For purposes of this table, the present value of accumulated benefits as of December 31, 20142017 (measured December 31, 2014)2017) was calculated using a discount rate of 3.50%3.25%, which is consistent with the assumptions used in the Bank's financial statements. Actual benefit payments under each plan may differ based on the applicable discount rate under the terms of the relevant plan. WeThe Bank withdrew from the FIRF, a multiple-employer tax-qualified defined benefit plan, on December 31, 1995. Amounts under the Benefit Equalization PlanBEP and the Deferred Compensation PlanDCP represent the present value of only the pension-related benefits accumulated for the named executive officer.
(2)For the purposes of this table, the years of credited service for the Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (SERP)SERP represent the years of participation since the inception of the SERP in 2003 or the first year in which the participant initially became active in the SERP. For purposes of determining the amount of Bank contribution in the SERP table, the years of creditcredited service are defined in the SERP.
(3)Ms. MacMillen served as chief operating officer until March 31, 2017.


220


Table of Contents

Narrative to Pension Benefits Table

For information regarding the plans in the table, see the discussion in our Compensation Discussion and Analysis under “Cash Balance Plan and the Financial Institutions Retirement Fund,” “Benefit Equalization Plan,” “Deferred

219

Table of Contents

Compensation Plan,” and “Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan.” The valuation method and material assumptions used in quantifying the present value of the current accrued benefits in the table are consistent with the assumptions used in the Bank's financial statements. See the discussion in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data - Note 16 - Employee Retirement Plans and Incentive Compensation Plans.”

Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The following table reflects the non-qualified Deferred Compensation Plan balances for the president, the executive vice president, and the other named executive officers as of December 31, 2014.2017, for the named executive officers.

(In whole dollars)                        
Name and Principal PositionLast Fiscal Year 
Beginning of
Year Balance

 
2014 Executive Contributions(1)

 
2014 Bank
Contributions(2)

 
Aggregate
Earnings/
(Losses)
in 2014

 
Aggregate
(Withdrawals)/
Distributions
in 2014

 
Yearend 2014
Aggregate Balance(3)

Last Fiscal Year 
Beginning of
Year Balance

 
2017 Executive Contributions(1)

 
2017 Bank
Contributions(2)

 
Aggregate
Earnings/
(Losses)
in 2017

 
Aggregate
(Withdrawals)/
Distributions
in 2017

 
Yearend 2017
Aggregate Balance(3)

Dean Schultz2014 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
J. Gregory Seibly

2017 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
President and                        
Chief Executive Officer                        
                        
Lisa B. MacMillen2014 4,187,852
 575,100
 
 268,260
 
 5,031,212
2017 5,762,930
 515,037
 
 920,785
 
 7,198,752
Executive Vice President and                        
Chief Operating Officer                        
            
Kenneth C. Miller2017 
 
 
 
 
 
Senior Vice President and            
Chief Financial Officer            
                        
Lawrence H. Parks2014 273,611
 84,000
 5,040
 32
 
 362,683
2017 560,029
 102,000
 6,120
 417


 668,566
Senior Vice President,                        
External and Legislative Affairs                        
                        
Suzanne Titus-Johnson2014 40,026
 
 
 83
 (40,109) 
2017 132,590
 216,190
 
 52,147
 
 400,927
Senior Vice President and                        
General Counsel and Corporate Secretary                        
                        
Kenneth C. Miller2014 54,659
 
 
 (334) (54,325) 
Stephen P. Traynor2017 2,291,417
 479,700
 7,200
 279,631
 (87,321) 2,970,627
Senior Vice President and                        
Chief Financial Officer            
            
David H. Martens2014 258,343
 28,800
 1,728
 (24,373) 
 264,498
Senior Vice President and            
Chief Risk Officer            
Chief Banking Officer            

(1)The 20142017 executive contributions made by Ms. MacMillen and Ms. Titus-Johnson are included in the “Non-Equity"Non-Equity Incentive Payment”Payment" and “Non-Equity"Non-Equity LTIP Payout”Payout" columns in the Summary Compensation Table (SCT), and; the 20142017 executive contributions made by Mr. Martens and Mr. Parks are included in the ”Salary”"Salary" column for 20142017 in the SCT; and the 2017 executive contributions for Mr. Traynor include $120,000 reported in the “Salary” column for 2017 in the SCT.
(2)Represents make-up Bank matching contributions lost under the Savings Plan as a result of deferring compensation. The 20142017 Bank contribution made to Mr. MartensParks and Mr. ParksTraynor are included in the “All Other Compensation”Compensation" column for 20142017 in the SCT.
(3)The yearend 20142017 aggregate balance for Mr. Parks includes $78,000$96,000 and $72,000$90,000 reported in the “Salary” column"Salary" Column for 20132016 and 20122015 in the SCT, respectively, and includes $4,680$5,760 and $4,320$5,400 reported in the “All"All Other Compensation”Compensation" column for 20132016 and 20122015 in the SCT, respectively. The yearend 2017 aggregate balance for Ms. Titus-Johnson includes $120,000 in the "Salary" column for 2016 in the SCT, and includes $7,200 reported in the "All Other Compensation" column for 2016 in the SCT. The yearend 2017 aggregate balance for Ms. MacMillen includes $260,000 and $244,666 reported in the “Non-Equity Incentive Payment” and “Non-Equity LTIP Payout” columns, respectively, for 2016 in the SCT.


221


Table of Contents

Narrative to Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table

The Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table presents information about our Deferred Compensation Plan (DCP), which is designed to allow Bank officers to defer up to 100% of base salary and short- and long-term incentive cash compensation awards, as applicable. Directors may also participate in the DCP to defer up to 100% of their director fees.


220

Table of Contents

In addition, since one of the factors involved in determining benefits under the Bank's Savings Plan is an officer's annual base salary compensation, this table also presents make-up matching contributions that would have been made by the Bank under the Savings Plan had the annual base salary compensation not been deferred.

The Bank's matching contribution under the Savings Plan is calculated on the basis of an officer's base salary after deferring base salary compensation under the DCP. As a result, an officer who defers base salary compensation forgoes the Bank's matching contribution on the portion of compensation that is deferred. To compensate for this, the Bank makes a contribution credit to the officer's DCP balance to restore the benefit under the Savings Plan that would otherwise be lost as a result of deferring base salary compensation.

Participants may direct the investments of deferred amounts into core mutual funds or into a brokerage account. Participants may change these investment directions at any time. All investment earnings accumulate to the benefit of the participants on a tax-deferred basis. Brokerage fees relating to purchases and sales are charged against the value of the participant's deferred balance in the plan. The Bank pays all set-up and annual account administration fees.

Income taxes are deferred until a participant receives payment of funds from the plan. Participants may elect payouts in a lump sum or over a payout period from 2 to 10 years. A participant may change any previously elected payment schedule by submitting a written election. Any written election to change the payment schedule must be made at least 12 months prior to the original payout date, and the new payout date, in most cases, must be at least 5 years from the original payout date.



221222


Table of Contents

DirectorCHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER PAY RATIO

For the year ended December 31, 2017, the ratio of the Bank’s chief executive officer’s total compensation for 2017 to the Bank’s median of the annual total compensation for 2017 of all our employees, except the chief executive officer (Median Employee) is 12.86:1. For total compensation for the Bank’s chief executive officer and the Median Employee, we used the same elements of compensation presented in the Summary Compensation Table and calculated total compensation in the same manner total compensation is calculated for the Summary Compensation Table for both employees, which includes among other things, amounts attributable to the change in pension value, which will vary among employees based upon their tenure at the Bank. For 2017, the total compensation of the Median Employee was $187,108, and the total compensation of the CEO, as reported in the Total Compensation column in the Summary Compensation Table, was $2,406,663.

We identified the Median Employee by calculating the 2017 total compensation (using the same elements of compensation in the Summary Compensation Table and in the same manner total compensation is calculated for the Summary Compensation Table) for each of the employees who were employed by the Bank on December 31, 2017, and ranking the 2017 total compensation for all such employees (a list of 285 employees) from lowest to highest, excluding the chief executive officer. The employees in the calculation included all full-time and part-time employees and we annualized compensation for all such employees.

223


Table of Contents

DIRECTOR COMPENSATION

We provide our directors with compensation for the performance of their duties as members of the Board of Directors and for the amount of time spent on Bankthe Bank’s business.

Director Compensation Table
For the Year Ended December 31, 2014
Director Compensation Table
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
Director Compensation Table
For the Year Ended December 31, 2017
  
(In whole dollars)  
NameFees Earned
or Paid in Cash

John F. Luikart, Chairman$100,000
Douglas H. (Tad) Lowrey, Vice Chairman95,000
Name of Directors serving during 2017Fees Earned
or Paid in Cash

Douglas H. (Tad) Lowrey(1)
$125,000
Melinda Guzman(2)
120,000
Bradley W. Beal(1)
56,000
105,000
Craig G. Blunden90,000
95,000
Steven R. Gardner(2)(3)
75,000
95,000
Melinda Guzman90,000
Richard A. Heldebrant90,000
W. Douglas Hile(3)
90,000
Richard A. Heldebrant(4)
105,000
Simone Lagomarsino89,181
110,000
John F. Luikart105,000
Kevin Murray90,000
110,000
Robert F. Nielsen90,000
95,000
Brian M. Riley105,000
John F. Robinson90,000
105,000
F. Daniel Siciliano95,000
Scott C. Syphax90,000
105,000
John T. Wasley85,040
105,000
Total$1,220,221
$1,580,000

(1)Bradley W. Beal’sMr. Lowrey served as Chair during 2017. Mr. Lowrey’s term began May 1, 2014.as director expired December 31, 2017.
(2)Steven R. Gardner’s term began January 1, 2014.Ms. Guzman served as Vice Chair during 2017.
(3)W. Douglas Hile’sMr. Gardner’s term endedas director expired December 31, 2014.2017.
(4)Mr. Heldebrant resigned as director from the Board effective December 31, 2017, upon his retirement from Star One Credit Union.

On occasion, the Bank pays for resort activities for directors in connection with Board meetings and other business-related meetings, and, in some cases, the Bank may pay the expenses for spouses accompanying directors to these meetings or other Bank-sponsored events. The value of these perquisites are considered de minimis and not included in the table above.

The Board of Directors Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy for 2014 (20142017 (2017 Directors Compensation Policy) provided the directors with compensation for the performance of their duties as members of the Board of Directors and the amount of time spent on official Bank business, as set forth below.




224


Table of Contents

(In whole dollars)          
Position
Maximum Annual
Service Fee

 
Maximum Annual
 Meeting Fees

 
Total
Maximum Annual
Compensation

Maximum Annual
Service Fee

 
Maximum Annual
 Meeting Fees

 
Total
Maximum Annual
Compensation

Chairman$55,000
 $45,000
 $100,000
Vice Chairman50,000
 45,000
 95,000
Committee Chair45,000
 45,000
 90,000
Chair$77,500
 $47,500
 $125,000
Vice Chair72,500
 47,500
 120,000
Audit and Risk Committee Chairs62,500
 47,500
 110,000
All Other Committee Chairs57,500
 47,500
 105,000
Directors on Audit Committee35,000
 45,000
 80,000
52,500
 47,500
 100,000
Other Directors30,000
 45,000
 75,000
47,500
 47,500
 95,000

Under the 20142017 Directors Compensation Policy, service fees for the above positions were paid for serving as a director during and between regularly scheduled meetings of the Board. The maximum annual service fee was prorated and paid with the meeting fee, if applicable, at the conclusion of each two-month service period on the Board of Directors (monthend February, April, June, August, October, and December). Any director who joined or left the Board between service fee payments received a prorated service fee for the number of days the director was

222

Table of Contents

on the Board during the service period. In addition, each director received a fee of $9,000$9,500 for attending any portion of five of the six regularly scheduled two-day Board meetings, subject to the annual maximum of $45,000.$47,500.

The 20142017 Directors Compensation Policy provided that a director could receive a meeting fee for participation in one regularly scheduled Board meeting by telephone. No other fee was paid for participation in meetings of the Board or committees by telephone or participation in other Bank or FHLBank System activities. The president of the Bank was authorized to interpret the 20142017 Directors Compensation Policy, as necessary, according to applicable statutory, regulatory, and policy limits.

Under the 20142017 Directors Compensation Policy, the final prorated service fee was to be withheld if a director did not attend at least 75% of all regular and special meetings of the Board and the director's assigned committees for the year, or if the Board determined a director had consistently demonstrated a lack of engagement and participation in meetings attended. In addition, the meeting fee attendance requirement provided that a director would receive a meeting fee only if he or she attended the regular Board meeting as well as at least one assigned committee meeting during the Board's regularly scheduled two-day meetings.

Under the 20142017 Directors Compensation Policy, the Bank reimbursed directors for necessary and reasonable travel, subsistence, and other related expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their official duties, which may have included participation in meetings or activities for which no fee was paid.

For expense reimbursement purposes, directors' official duties included:
Meetings of the Board and Board committees,
Meetings requested by the Finance Agency and FHLBank System committees,
Meetings of the Council of FHLBanks and its committees,
Meetings of the Bank's Affordable Housing Advisory Council,
Events attended on behalf of the Bank when requested by the president in consultation with the chairman,chair,
Other events attended on behalf of the Bank with the prior approval of the EEO-Personnel-Compensation Committee of the Board, andchair,
Director education events attended with the prior approval of the chairman.chair, and
National Association of Corporate Directors Annual Meeting.

The 2017 Directors Compensation Policy also provides that directors may receive up to an additional $1,500 in compensation in the form of expense reimbursement for meals and travel for a spouse or significant other.

The Board adopted a Board of Directors Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy for 2015,2018, which is substantially similar to the 20142017 Directors Compensation Policy.Policy except that the maximum total service fees were increased by $10,000 for all director positions on the Board, including Board Chair and Vice Chair, all committee chairs, and all other directors, such that the total maximum compensation for 2018 was increased by $10,000 for all


223225


Table of Contents

directors. Director fees were increased to more closely align with relevant market benchmarks for director compensation and trends at other FHLBanks.

ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth information about those stockholders that are beneficial owners of more than 5% of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco’s outstanding capital stock, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, as of February 28, 2015.2018.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of
Shares Held

 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares

Number of
Shares Held

 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares

Citibank, N.A.(1)
5,772,202
 14.4%
701 East 60th Street, North   
Sioux Falls, SD 57104   
Charles Schwab Bank4,050,000
 10.8%
2360 Corporate Circle   
Henderson, NV 89074   
      
Bank of America California, N.A.3,818,487
 9.5
555 California Street   
MUFG Union Bank, NA3,240,000
 8.7
400 California Street   
San Francisco, CA 94104      
      
JPMorgan Chase Bank and Trust Company, National Association2,681,349
 6.7
560 Mission Street   
San Francisco, CA 94105   
JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association(1)
3,068,088
 8.2
1111 Polaris Parkway   
Columbus, OH 43240   
   
First Republic Bank2,848,500
 7.6
111 Pine Street   
San Francisco, CA 94111   
      
Bank of the West2,577,585
 6.4
2,331,550
 6.2
180 Montgomery Street      
San Francisco, CA 94104      
   
First Republic Bank2,479,250
 6.2
111 Pine Street   
San Francisco, CA 94111   
Total17,328,873
 43.2%15,538,138
 41.5%

(1)The capital stock held by this institution is classified as mandatorily redeemable capital stock.Nonmember institution.


The following table sets forth information about those members (or their holding companies) with officers or directors serving as directors of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco as of February 28, 2015.2018.

Director NameName of Institution City State 
Number of
Shares Held

 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares

Name of Institution City State 
Number of
Shares Held

 
Percentage of
Outstanding
Shares

Jeffrey K. BallFriendly Hills Bank Whittier CA 8,346
 %
Bradley W. BealOne Nevada Credit Union Las Vegas NV 28,670
 0.1%One Nevada Credit Union Las Vegas NV 14,561
 
Craig G. BlundenProvident Savings Bank Riverside CA 70,562
 0.2
Provident Savings Bank Riverside CA 81,078
 0.2
Steven R. GardnerPacific Premier Bank Irvine CA 159,800
 0.4
Richard A. HeldebrantStar One Credit Union Sunnyvale CA 707,789
 1.8
Marangal (Marito) DomingoFirst Technology Federal Credit Union Mountain View CA 667,316
 1.8
Simone LagomarsinoHeritage Oaks Bank Paso Robles CA 78,531
 0.2
Pacific Premier Bank Irvine CA 172,500
 0.5
Douglas H. (Tad) LowreyPacific Western Bank Los Angeles CA 406,086
 1.0
Joan C. OppStanford Federal Credit Union Palo Alto CA 142,616
 0.4
Brian M. RileyMohave State Bank Lake Havasu City AZ 11,172
 
Mohave State Bank Lake Havasu City AZ 29,674
 0.1
John F. RobinsonSilicon Valley Bank Santa Clara CA 250,000
 0.6
Silicon Valley Bank Santa Clara CA 189,000
 0.5
Total 1,712,610
 4.3% 1,305,091
 3.5%


224226


Table of Contents

ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Capital stock ownership is a prerequisite to transacting any member business with the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank). The members, former members, and certain other nonmembers own all the capital stock of the Bank, the majority of the directors of the Bank are officers or directors of members, and the Bank conducts its advances and purchased mortgage loan business almost exclusively with members or member successors. The Bank extends credit in the ordinary course of business to members with officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank and to members owning more than 5% of the Bank's capital stock (5% shareholders) on market terms that are no more favorable to them than the terms of comparable transactions with other members. In addition, the Bank may transact short-term investments, Federal funds sold, and mortgage-backed securities (MBS) with members and their affiliates that have officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank or with 5% shareholders. All investments are market rate transactions, and all MBS are purchased through securities brokers or dealers. The Bank may also be the primary obligor on debt issued in the form of Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLBank) System consolidated obligations using underwriters and dealers, and may enter into interest rate exchange agreements with counterparties, that may be affiliates of Bank members with officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank or affiliates of members and nonmembers owning more than 5% of the Bank's capital stock, which are transactions in the ordinary course of the Bank's business and are market rate transactions.

The FHLBank Act requires the Bank to establish an Affordable Housing Program (AHP). The Bank provides subsidies to members, which use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Subsidies may be in the form of direct grants or below-market interest rate advances. Only Bank members, along with their nonmember AHP project sponsors, may submit AHP applications. All AHP subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

The FHLBank Act also requires the Bank to establish a Community Investment Program (CIP) and authorizes the Bank to offer additional Community Investment Cash Advance (CICA) programs. Under these programs, the Bank provides subsidies in the form of grants and below-market interest rate advances or standby letters of credit to members for community lending and economic development projects. Only Bank members may submit applications for these credit program subsidies. All CICA subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

In instances where an AHP or CICA transaction involves a member that owns more than 5% of the Bank's capital stock (or an affiliate of such a member), a member with an officer or director who is a director of the Bank, or an entity with an executive officer, director, controlling shareholder, or general partner who serves as a director of the Bank (and that has a direct or indirect interest in the subsidy), the transaction is subject to the same eligibility and other program criteria and requirements as all other comparable transactions and to the regulations governing the operations of the relevant program.

The Bank may also use members that have officers or directors who serve as directors of the Bank or 5% shareholders or their affiliates as securities custodians and derivative dealer counterparties. These financial relationships are conducted in the ordinary course of business on terms and conditions similar to those that would be available for comparable services if provided by unaffiliated entities.

The Bank does not have a written policy to have the Board of Directors (Board) review, approve, or ratify transactions with members that are outside the ordinary course of business because such transactions rarely occur. However, it has been the Bank's practice to report to the Board all transactions between the Bank and its members that are outside the ordinary course of business, and, on a case-by-case basis, seek Board approval or ratification.







225227


Table of Contents

Director Independence

General

Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the Bank is required to identify directors who are independent, and members of the Board's Audit Committee and EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee and any committee performing similar functions to a nominating committee who are not independent, using the independence definition of a national securities exchange or automated quotation system. The Bank's capital stock is not listed on a national securities exchange or automated quotation system, and the Bank's Board of Directors is not subject to the independence requirement of any such exchange or automated quotation system. The Bank is subject to the independence standards for directors serving on the Bank's Audit Committee set forth in the rules of the Federal Housing Finance BoardAgency (Finance Board)Agency), predecessor to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, and looks to the Finance BoardAgency independence standards to determine independence for all directors, whether or not they serve on the Audit Committee. In addition, for purposes of compliance with the SEC's disclosure rules only, the Board has evaluated director independence using the definition of independence articulated in the rules of the National Association of Securities Dealers Automated Quotations (NASDAQ).

In addition to the independence rules and standards above, the FHLBanks are required to comply with the rules issued by the SEC under Section 10A(m) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which includes a substantive independence rule prohibiting a director from being a member of the Audit Committee if he or she, other than in his or her capacity as a member of the Audit Committee, the Bank's Board of Directors, or any other Board committee, accepts any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee from the Bank or is an “affiliated person” of the Bank as defined by the SEC rules (the person controls, is controlled by, or is under common control with the Bank).

Director Independence under the Finance BoardAgency Regulations

The Finance BoardAgency director independence rule provides that a director is sufficiently independent to serve as a member of the Bank's Audit Committee if that director does not have a disqualifying relationship with the Bank or its management that would interfere with the exercise of that director's independent judgment. Disqualifying relationships under the Finance BoardAgency independence standards include, but are not limited to: (i) employment with the Bank at any time during the last five years; (ii) acceptance of compensation from the Bank other than for service as a director; (iii) being a consultant, advisor, promoter, underwriter, or legal counsel for the Bank at any time within the last five years; and (iv) being an immediate family member of an individual who is or who has been a Bank executive officer within the past five years.

Although the Finance Board'sAgency's independence standard only applies by regulation to members of the Bank's Audit Committee, the Bank's Board looks to this standard for purposes of determining independence of all Bank directors.

The independence standard imposed on the Audit Committee under the Finance BoardAgency regulations takes into account the fact that the Bank was created by Congress; the Bank has a cooperative ownership structure; the Bank is statutorily required to have member directors who are either an officer or director of a Bank member; the Bank was created to provide its members with products and services; and the Bank's Board of Directors is statutorily required to administer the affairs of the Bank fairly and impartially and without discrimination in favor of or against any member borrower. The Finance Board'sAgency's independence standards do not include as a disqualifying relationship any business relationships between a director's member institution and the Bank. Consistent with the rule, the Bank's Board does not believe that the statutorily prescribed business relationships between a director's member institution and the Bank interfere with the director's exercise of his or her independent judgment. The national securities exchanges' independence definition, including those of the NASDAQ, do not generally take into account the cooperative nature of the Bank. Accordingly, the Bank's Board believes that the appropriate standard for measuring director independence is the Finance Board'sAgency's independence standards.

Applying the Finance BoardAgency independence standards, the Board has determined that all directors who served in 20142017 were, and all current directors are, independent.

226228


Table of Contents


Director Independence under the NASDAQ Rules

If the Bank uses the NASDAQ standard for purposes of complying with the SEC disclosure rules, the Board must make an affirmative determination that the director does not have a relationship with the Bank that would impair his or her independence. “Independent director” under the NASDAQ rules means a person other than an executive officer or employee of the company or any other individual having a relationship which, in the opinion of the issuer's board of directors, would interfere with the exercise of independent judgment in carrying out the responsibilities of a director.

In addition, the NASDAQ rules set forth seven relationships that automatically preclude a determination of director independence. Among other things, a director is not considered to be independent if the director is, or has a family member who is, a partner in, or a controlling shareholder or an executive officer of, any organization to which the Bank made, or from which the Bank received, payments for property or services in the current or any of the past three fiscal years that exceed 5% of the recipient's consolidated gross revenues for that year, or $200,000, whichever is more. This particular relationship is referred to below as the payments/revenues relationship.

Using the NASDAQ rules, the Board affirmatively determined that in its opinion Ms. Guzman, Mr. Luikart, Mr. Murray, Mr. Nielsen, Mr. Siciliano, Mr. Syphax, and Mr. Wasley, who are current nonmember directors and are not employed by and do not serve as a director of any member institution, are independent and, to the extent they served as nonmember directors in 2014,2017, were independent in 20142017 under the NASDAQ rules because they have no relationship with the Bank that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities.

Using the NASDAQ rules, the Board affirmatively determined that in its opinion the following current member directors are independent and, to the extent they served as member directors in 2014,2017, were independent in 20142017 under the NASDAQ rules because they have no relationship with the Bank that would interfere with their exercise of independent judgment in carrying out their responsibilities as directors: Mr. Ball, Mr. Beal, Mr. Blunden, Mr. Gardner, Mr. Heldebrant,Domingo, Ms. Lagomarsino, Mr. Lowrey,Ms. Opp, Mr. Riley, and Mr. Robinson. Using the NASDAQ rules, the following former director who served in 2014 was considered independent by the Board because he had no relationship with the Bank that would interfere with his exercise of independent judgment in carrying out his responsibilities as a director: Mr. Hile.

In making these determinations, the Board recognized that during their directorships the member directors were employed by or served as a director of a member institution that may have conducted business with the Bank in the ordinary course of the Bank's and the member institution’s respective businesses. The Board determined that these ordinary course customer relationships with the member institutions that had or have member directors on the Board would not interfere with the member directors' exercise of independent judgment or their independence from management under the NASDAQ rules. This determination is based on the fact that the Bank was created by Congress, the Bank has a cooperative ownership structure, the Bank is statutorily required to have member directors who are either an officer or director of a Bank member, the Bank was created to provide its members with products and services, and the Board is statutorily required to administer the affairs of the Bank fairly and impartially and without discrimination in favor of or against any member borrower.

Audit Committee Independence

The Board has an Audit Committee. Under the Finance Board'sAgency's independence standards and NASDAQ rules, all Audit Committee members who served in 20142017 were independent and all current Audit Committee members are independent.

All Audit Committee members who served in 20142017 and all current Audit Committee members met the substantive independence rules under Section 10A(m) of the 1934 Act.


227229


Table of Contents

EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee Independence

The Board has an EEO-Personnel-Compensationa Compensation and Human Resources Committee. Using the Finance Board'sAgency's director independence standards and under the NASDAQ rules, all EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee members who served in 20142017 were independent, and all current EEO-Personnel-CompensationCompensation and Human Resources Committee members are independent.

Under the NASDAQ rules, to be considered an independent compensation committee member, a director must meet the definition under the general NASDAQ independence rules, and the board of directors must affirmatively determine the independence of any director who will serve on the company’s compensation committee and must consider all factors specifically relevant to determining whether such a director has a relationship to the company that is material to that director’s ability to be independent from management in connection with the duties of a compensation committee member. Relevant factors must include the source of compensation of directors, including any consulting, advisory, or other compensatory fee paid by the company to the directors and whether the director is affiliated with the company.

Governance Committee

The Board has a Governance Committee that performs certain functions that are similar to those of a nominating committee with respect to the nomination of nonmember independent directors. Using the Finance Board'sAgency’s director independence standards, all Governance Committee members who served in 20142017 were independent and all current Governance Committee members are independent.

ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed to the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco (Bank) for the years ended December 31, 20142017 and 2013,2016, by its external accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

(In millions)2014
 2013
2017
 2016
Audit fees$0.9
 $1.2
$1.0
 $1.0
All other fees
 

 
Total$0.9
 $1.2
$1.0
 $1.0

Audit Fees. Audit fees during 20142017 and 20132016 were for professional services rendered in connection with the audits of the Bank's annual financial statements, the review of the Bank's quarterly financial statements included in each Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, and the audit of the Bank's internal control over financial reporting.

All Other Fees. All other fees for 20142017 and 20132016 were for accounting and internal control consulting and advisory services. The Bank is exempt from all federal, state, and local taxation, and no tax consulting fees were paid during 20142017 and 2013.2016.

Audit Committee Pre-Approval Policy

In accordance with the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and regulations implementing the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (SEC rules), all audit, audit-related, and non-audit services proposed to be performed by the Bank's independent auditor must be pre-approved by the Audit Committee to ensure that they do not impair the auditor's independence. The SEC rules require that proposed services either be specifically pre-approved on a case-by-case basis (specific pre-approval services) or be pre-approved without case-by-case review under policies and procedures established by the Audit Committee that are detailed as to the particular service and do not delegate Audit Committee responsibilities to management (general pre-approval services).

The Bank's Audit Committee has adopted a policy, the Independent Auditor Services Pre-Approval Policy (Policy), setting forth the procedures and conditions pursuant to which services proposed to be performed by the Bank's

228230


Table of Contents

independent auditor may be approved. Under the Policy, unless services to be provided by the independent auditor have received general pre-approval, they require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee. Any proposed services exceeding the pre-approved maximum fee amounts set forth in the appendices to the Policy will also require specific pre-approval by the Audit Committee.

The Policy is designed to be detailed as to the particular services that may be provided by the independent auditor and to provide for the Audit Committee to be informed of each service provided by the independent auditor. The Policy is also intended to ensure that the Audit Committee does not delegate to management its responsibilities in connection with the approval of services to be provided by the independent auditor.

For both specific pre-approval and general pre-approval of services, the Audit Committee considers whether the proposed services are consistent with the SEC rules on auditor independence and whether the provision of the services by the independent auditor would impair the independent auditor's independence. The Audit Committee also considers (i) whether the independent auditor is positioned to provide effective and efficient services, given its familiarity with the Bank's business, management, culture, accounting systems, risk profile, and other factors, and (ii) whether having the independent auditor provide the service may enhance the Bank's ability to manage or control risk or improve audit quality. The Audit Committee also considers the total amounts of fees for audit, audit-related, and non-audit services for a given calendar year in deciding whether to pre-approve any such services and may choose to determine, for a particular calendar year, the appropriate ratio between the total amount of fees for audit and audit-related services and the total amount of fees for permissible non-audit services.

The Audit Committee annually reviews and pre-approves the services that may be provided by the independent auditor during a given calendar year without specific pre-approval from the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee has delegated to its chair and vice chair individually specific pre-approval authority for additional audit or audit-related services to be provided by the independent auditor, provided that the estimated fee for each type of proposed service does not exceed $50,000 and the total aggregated fees for all services pre-approved by each individual under this delegated authority do not exceed $100,000 in a calendar year. The chair or vice chair, as the case may be, is required to report to the Audit Committee any services pre-approved under the delegated authority.

In 20142017 and 2013,2016, 100% of the audit-related fees and all other fees were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.


229


Table of Contents

PART IV.

ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a) (1)Financial Statements
The financial statements included as part of this Form 10-K are identified in the Index to Audited Financial Statements appearing in “Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Form 10-K, which is incorporated in this Item 15 by reference.

(2)
Financial Statement Schedules    
All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are either not applicable or the required information is shown in the financial statements or the notes thereto.

(b)    Exhibits
Exhibit No. Description

 Organization Certificate and resolutions relating to the organization of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

231


Table of Contents


 Bylaws of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco, as amended and restated on January 31, 2014,26, 2018

Capital Plan, as amended and restated effective April 1, 2015, and updated August 3, 2015, to reflect adjustments to activity-based stock requirements, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.24.1 to the Bank's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 11, 2016 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Summary Sheet: Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 2018

Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 201410, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   
4.1
Capital Plan, as amended and restated effective April 1, 2015
4.2
Capital Plan, as amended and restated effective September 5, 2011, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Bank's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2011 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
10.1
Summary Sheet: Terms of Employment for Named Executive Officers for 2015
10.2
Form of Director Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

 Form of Senior Officer Indemnification Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Bank'sBank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 201110, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

 Change in Control SeveranceEmployment Agreement for Dean Schultz,by and among the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco and John Gregory Seibly, dated April 26, 2016, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.110.1 to the Bank's CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2011November 4, 2016 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

 Change in Control Severance Agreement for Lisa B. MacMillen, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Bank's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 7, 2011 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

 Board Resolution for 20152018 Board of Directors Compensation and Expense Reimbursement Policy
   
10.7+
 2014 President’sExecutive Incentive Plan, Appendices I-III, as approved December 23, 2016 and Appendix IV, as approved December 1, 2017

2016 Executive Performance Unit Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.13 to the Bank’s QuarterlyAnnual Report on Form 10-Q10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2014 (Commission File No. 000-51398).
10.8+
2014 Executive Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2014 (Commission File No. 000-51398).
10.9
2014 Executive Performance Unit Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Bank’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 9, 2014March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   
10.10
 20132016 Executive Performance Unit Plan Summary Description, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.310.14 to the Bank's QuarterlyBank’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on MayMarch 10, 20132017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   
10.11
 20122015 Executive Performance Unit Plan, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.310.15 to the Bank's QuarterlyBank’s Annual Report on Form 10-Q10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 9, 2012March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

230

Table of Contents


2015 Executive Performance Unit Plan Summary Description, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated effective January 1, 2018

 Executive Benefit Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to the Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   
10.13
 Original Deferred Compensation Plan, as restated, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Bank's Registration Statement on Form 10 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 30, 2005 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   
10.14
 Deferred Compensation Plan Amended and Restated Effective January 1, 2009, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to the Bank's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 23, 2011 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   
10.15
Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended and restated on July 1, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 000-51398)

 Corporate Senior Officer Severance Policy, as amended and restated on August 14, 2013, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to the Bank’s Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 14, 2014 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

 Amended and Restated Federal Home Loan Bank P&I Funding and Contingency Plan Agreement, effective as of July 20, 2006,January 1, 2017, by and among the Office of Finance and each of the Federal Home Loan Banks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.110.23 to the Bank's CurrentBank’s Annual Report on Form 8-K10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 28, 2006March 10, 2017 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

 Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended August 5, 2011, with the other 11 Federal Home Loan Banks, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Bank's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 5, 2011 (Commission File No. 000-51398)
   

232


Table of Contents


  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges – December 31, 20142017
   

  Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   

Certification of the Chief Operating Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
31.3
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   

  Certification of the President and Chief Executive Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   

Certification of the Chief Operating Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
32.3
  Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
   
99.1+
  Audit Committee Report
   
101
 Pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T, the following financial information from the Bank's annual report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2014,2016, is formatted in XBRL interactive data files: (i) Statements of Condition at December 31, 20142017 and 2013;2016; (ii) Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012;2015; (iii) Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012;2015; (iv) Statements of Capital Accounts for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012;2015; (v) Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2014, 2013,2017, 2016, and 2012;2015; and (vi) Notes to Financial Statements.

+Confidential treatment has been requested as to portions of this exhibit.

++The report contained in Exhibit 99.1 is being furnished and will not be deemed filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.


231233


Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 13, 2015.9, 2018.
 
FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF SAN FRANCISCO
 
  
/S/ DEAN SCHULTZS/ J. GREGORY SEIBLY

 
Dean SchultzJ. Gregory Seibly
President and Chief Executive Officer
 
March 13, 20159, 2018 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 13, 2015.9, 2018.
 
/S/ DEAN SCHULTZS/ J. GREGORY SEIBLY

 
Dean SchultzJ. Gregory Seibly
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal executive officer)
 
  
/S/ LISA B. MACMILLEN
Lisa B. MacMillen
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
(Principal executive officer)
S/S/ KENNETH KENNETH C. MILLERMILLER 
Kenneth C. Miller
Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal financial officer and Principal accounting officer)
 
  
/S/ JOHNS/ JOHN F. LUIKARTLUIKART  
 
John F. Luikart
ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors
 
  
/S/ DOUGLAS H. (TAD) LOWREYS/ BRIAN M. RILEY
 
Douglas H. (Tad) LowreyBrian M. Riley
Vice ChairmanChair of the Board of Directors
 
  
/S/ BRADLEYS/ JEFFREY K. BALL
Jeffrey K. Ball
Director
/S/ BRADLEY W. BEALBEAL
 
Bradley W. Beal
Director
 
  
/S/ CRAIGS/ CRAIG G. BLUNDENBLUNDEN
 
Craig G. Blunden Director 
  
/S/ STEVEN R. GARDNERS/ MARANGAL I. DOMINGO
 
Steven R. GardnerMarangal I. Domingo
Director
 
  

232234


Table of Contents

/S/ MELINDA GUZMAN        S/ MELINDA GUZMAN
 
Melinda Guzman
Director
 
  
/S/ RICHARD A. HELDEBRANT
Richard A. HeldebrantS/ SIMONE LAGOMARSINO
Director
/S/ SIMONE LAGOMARSINO 
Simone Lagomarsino
Director
 
  
/S/ KEVIN MURRAYS/ KEVIN MURRAY
 
Kevin Murray
Director
 
  
/S/ ROBERTS/ ROBERT F. NIELSENNIELSEN
 
Robert F. Nielsen
Director
 
  
/S/ BRIAN M. RILEYS/ JOAN C. OPP
 
Brian M. RileyJoan C. Opp
Director
 
  
/S/ JOHNS/ JOHN F. ROBINSONROBINSON
 
John F. Robinson
Director
 
  
/S/ SCOTTS/ F. DANIEL SICILIANO
F. Daniel Siciliano
Director
/S/ SCOTT C. SYPHAX        SYPHAX 
 
Scott C. Syphax
 Director
 
  
/S/ JOHN T. WASLEY
 
John T. Wasley
Director
 
  


233235