0001326160 duk:DukeEnergyFloridaMember duk:StormRestorationCostRecoveryMember 2019-01-29 0001326160 duk:PiedmontNaturalGasMember us-gaap:OtherCurrentLiabilitiesMember us-gaap:CommodityContractMember us-gaap:NondesignatedMember 2019-12-3100013261602022FYfalse0000030371000109409300000177970000037637000002029000000810200000078460http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#AccountingStandardsUpdate201613MemberP3Yhttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#DeferredCreditsAndOtherLiabilitieshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#DeferredCreditsAndOtherLiabilities365770728http://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PublicUtilitiesPropertyPlantAndEquipmentNethttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PublicUtilitiesPropertyPlantAndEquipmentNethttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitiesCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitiesCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#LongTermDebtCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#LongTermDebtCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#LongTermDebtNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#LongTermDebtNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PrepaidExpenseAndOtherAssetsCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitiesCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#DeferredCreditsAndOtherLiabilitieshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#PrepaidExpenseAndOtherAssetsCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherLiabilitiesCurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#DeferredCreditsAndOtherLiabilitieshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#DeferredCreditsAndOtherLiabilitieshttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#OtherAssetsNoncurrenthttp://fasb.org/us-gaap/2022#DeferredCreditsAndOtherLiabilities1111111111111111111111111111110001326160duk:DECNCSFAndDEPNCSFMemberus-gaap:VariableInterestEntityPrimaryBeneficiaryMember2022-01-012022-12-31



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal periodyear ended December 31, 20192022 or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from________to________
Commission
file number

File Number
Registrant, State of Incorporation or Organization, Address of Principal Executive Offices, Zip Code and Telephone Number
IRS Employer
Identification No.
duk-20221231_g1.jpg
1-32853DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION20-2777218
(a Delaware corporation)
550526 South TryonChurch Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-1803
704-382-3853
1-4928DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC56-0205520
(a North Carolina limited liability company)
526 South Church Street
Charlotte, North Carolina 28202-1803
704-382-3853
1-15929PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.56-2155481
(a North Carolina corporation)
410 South Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1748
704-382-3853
1-3382DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC56-0165465
(a North Carolina limited liability company)
410 South Wilmington Street
Raleigh, North Carolina 27601-1748
704-382-3853
1-3274DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC59-0247770
(a Florida limited liability company)
299 First Avenue North
St. Petersburg, Florida 33701
704-382-3853
1-1232DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.31-0240030
(an Ohio corporation)
139 East Fourth Street
Cincinnati, Ohio 45202
704-382-3853
1-3543DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC35-0594457
(an Indiana limited liability company)
1000 East Main Street
Plainfield, Indiana 46168
704-382-3853
1-6196PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.56-0556998
(a North Carolina corporation)
4720 Piedmont Row Drive
Charlotte, North Carolina 28210
704-364-3120



SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) OF THE ACT:
Name of each exchange on
Registrant
RegistrantTitle of each class        Trading symbols    which registered
Duke Energy Corporation    Common Stock, $0.001 par value         DUK    New York Stock Exchange LLC
Duke Energy Corporation
Common Stock, $0.001 par value     DUK    New York Stock Exchange LLC
(Duke Energy)
Duke Energy
5.125% Junior Subordinated Debentures due     DUKH
Duke Energy    5.625% Junior Subordinated Debentures due         DUKB    New York Stock Exchange LLC
January 15, 2073
Duke Energy
5.625% Junior Subordinated Debentures due     DUKB    New York Stock Exchange LLC
September 15, 2078
Duke Energy
Duke Energy    Depositary Shares, each representing a 1/1,000th         DUK PR A    New York Stock Exchange LLC
interest in a share of 5.75% Series A Cumulative
Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, par value
$0.001 per share

Duke Energy        3.10% Senior Notes due 2028             DUK 28A        New York Stock Exchange LLC
Duke Energy        3.85% Senior Notes due 2034             DUK 34        New York Stock Exchange LLC
SECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) OF THE ACT:  None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Duke EnergyYesNoDuke Energy Florida, LLC (Duke Energy Florida)YesNo
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC (Duke Energy Carolinas)YesNoDuke Energy Ohio, Inc. (Duke Energy Ohio)YesNo
Progress Energy, Inc. (Progress Energy)YesNoDuke Energy Indiana, LLC (Duke Energy Indiana)YesNo
Duke Energy Progress, LLC (Duke Energy Progress)YesNoPiedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. (Piedmont)YesNo
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes No (Response applicable to all registrants.)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants (1) have filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrants have submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether Duke Energy is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filerAccelerated Filer  Accelerated filerFiler ¨ Non-accelerated filerFiler ¨ Smaller reporting companyReporting Company ¨ Emerging growth companyGrowth Company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether each of Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer, non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filerAccelerated Filer ¨ Accelerated filerFiler ¨ Non-accelerated filerFiler x Smaller reporting companyReporting Company ¨ Emerging growth companyGrowth Company ¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ¨

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ¨

Indicate by check mark whether each of the registrants is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Estimated aggregate market value of the common equity held by nonaffiliates of Duke Energy at June 30, 2019.$64,230,558,771
Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding at January 31, 2020.733,321,965
Estimated aggregate market value of the common equity held by nonaffiliates of Duke Energy at June 30, 2022.$82,471,565 
Number of shares of Common Stock, $0.001 par value, outstanding at January 31, 2023.770,080,285 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the Duke Energy definitive proxy statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of the Shareholders or an amendment to this Annual Report are incorporated by reference into PART III, Items 10, 11 and 13 hereof.
This combined Form 10-K is filed separately by eight registrants: Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont (collectively the Duke Energy Registrants). Information contained herein relating to any individual registrant is filed by such registrant solely on its own behalf. Each registrant makes no representation as to information relating exclusively to the other registrants.
Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont meet the conditions set forth in General Instructions I(1)(a) and (b) of Form 10-K and are, therefore, filing this Form 10-K with the reduced disclosure format specified in General Instructions I(2) of Form 10-K. 


Auditor Firm ID: 34      Auditor Name: Deloitte & Touche LLP Auditor Location: Charlotte, NC




TABLE OF CONTENTS


TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORM 10-K FOR THE YEAR ENDED December 31, 20192022
 Item 
Page
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 
GLOSSARY OF TERMS 
PART I. 
1.
PIEDMONT
1A.
1B.
2.
3.
4.
PART II. 
5.
6.
7.
7A.
8.
9.
9A.
PART III. 
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
PART IV. 
15.
 EXHIBIT INDEX
 
E-2

 Item 
 Page
   
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION 
   
GLOSSARY OF TERMS 
   
PART I.  
1.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 PIEDMONT
   
1A.
   
1B.
   
2.
   
3.
   
4.
   
PART II.  
5.
   
6.
   
7.
   
7A.
   
8.
   
9.
   
9A.
   
PART III.  
10.
   
11.
   
12.
   
13.
   
14.
   
PART IV.  
15.
 EXHIBIT INDEX
 





FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS


CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This document includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Forward-looking statements are based on management’s beliefs and assumptions and can often be identified by terms and phrases that include “anticipate,” “believe,” “intend,” “estimate,” “expect,” “continue,” “should,” “could,” “may,” “plan,” “project,” “predict,” “will,” “potential,” “forecast,” “target,” “guidance,” “outlook” or other similar terminology. Various factors may cause actual results to be materially different than the suggested outcomes within forward-looking statements; accordingly, there is no assurance that such results will be realized. These factors include, but are not limited to:
State, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives, including costs of compliance with existing and future environmental requirements, including those related to climate change, as well as rulings that affect cost and investment recovery or have an impact on rate structures or market prices;
The extent and timing of costs and liabilities to comply with federal and state laws, regulations and legal requirements related to coal ash remediation, including amounts for required closure of certain ash impoundments, are uncertain and difficult to estimate;
The ability to recover eligible costs, including amounts associated with coal ash impoundment retirement obligations and costs related to significant weather events, and to earn an adequate return on investment through rate case proceedings and the regulatory process;
The costs of decommissioning nuclear facilities could prove to be more extensive than amounts estimated and all costs may not be fully recoverable through the regulatory process;
Costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;
Industrial, commercial and residential growth or decline in service territories or customer bases resulting from sustained downturns of the economy and the economic health of our service territories or variations in customer usage patterns, including energy efficiency efforts and use of alternative energy sources, such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies;
Federal and state regulations, laws and other efforts designed to promote and expand the use of energy efficiency measures and distributed generation technologies, such as private solar and battery storage, in Duke Energy service territories could result in customers leaving the electric distribution system, excess generation resources as well as stranded costs;
Advancements in technology;
Additional competition in electric and natural gas markets and continued industry consolidation;
The influence of weather and other natural phenomena on operations, including the economic, operational and other effects of severe storms, hurricanes, droughts, earthquakes and tornadoes, including extreme weather associated with climate change;
The ability to successfully operate electric generating facilities and deliver electricity to customers including direct or indirect effects to the company resulting from an incident that affects the United States electric grid or generating resources;
The ability to obtain the necessary permits and approvals and to complete necessary or desirable pipeline expansion or infrastructure projects in our natural gas business;
Operational interruptions to our natural gas distribution and transmission activities;
The availability of adequate interstate pipeline transportation capacity and natural gas supply;
The impact on facilities and business from a terrorist attack, cybersecurity threats, data security breaches, operational accidents, information technology failures or other catastrophic events, such as fires, explosions, pandemic health events or other similar occurrences;
The inherent risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities, including environmental, health, safety, regulatory and financial risks, including the financial stability of third-party service providers;
The timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates and the ability to recover such costs through the regulatory process, where appropriate, and their impact on liquidity positions and the value of underlying assets;
The results of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings, interest rate fluctuations, compliance with debt covenants and conditions and general market and economic conditions;
Credit ratings of the Duke Energy Registrants may be different from what is expected;
Declines in the market prices of equity and fixed-income securities and resultant cash funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans, other post-retirement benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;
Construction and development risks associated with the completion of the Duke Energy Registrants’ capital investment projects, including risks related to financing, obtaining and complying with terms of permits, meeting construction budgets and schedules and satisfying operating and environmental performance standards, as well as the ability to recover costs from customers in a timely manner, or at all;
Changes in rules for regional transmission organizations, including changes in rate designs and new and evolving capacity markets, and risks related to obligations created by the default of other participants;
The ability to control operation and maintenance costs;
The level of creditworthiness of counterparties to transactions;
The ability to obtain adequate insurance at acceptable costs;
The ability to implement our business strategy, including our carbon emission reduction goals;
State, federal and foreign legislative and regulatory initiatives, including costs of compliance with existing and future environmental requirements, including those related to climate change, as well as rulings that affect cost and investment recovery or have an impact on rate structures or market prices;
The extent and timing of costs and liabilities to comply with federal and state laws, regulations and legal requirements related to coal ash remediation, including amounts for required closure of certain ash impoundments, are uncertain and difficult to estimate;
The ability to recover eligible costs, including amounts associated with coal ash impoundment retirement obligations, asset retirement and construction costs related to carbon emissions reductions, and costs related to significant weather events, and to earn an adequate return on investment through rate case proceedings and the regulatory process;
The costs of decommissioning nuclear facilities could prove to be more extensive than amounts estimated and all costs may not be fully recoverable through the regulatory process;
The impact of extraordinary external events, such as the pandemic health event resulting from COVID-19, and their collateral consequences, including the disruption of global supply chains or the economic activity in our service territories;
Costs and effects of legal and administrative proceedings, settlements, investigations and claims;
Industrial, commercial and residential growth or decline in service territories or customer bases resulting from sustained downturns of the economy, reduced customer usage due to cost pressures from inflation or fuel costs, and the economic health of our service territories or variations in customer usage patterns, including energy efficiency efforts, natural gas building and appliance electrification, and use of alternative energy sources, such as self-generation and distributed generation technologies;
Federal and state regulations, laws and other efforts designed to promote and expand the use of energy efficiency measures, natural gas electrification, and distributed generation technologies, such as private solar and battery storage, in Duke Energy service territories could result in a reduced number of customers, excess generation resources as well as stranded costs;
Advancements in technology;
Additional competition in electric and natural gas markets and continued industry consolidation;
The influence of weather and other natural phenomena on operations, including the economic, operational and other effects of severe storms, hurricanes, droughts, earthquakes and tornadoes, including extreme weather associated with climate change;
Changing investor, customer and other stakeholder expectations and demands including heightened emphasis on environmental, social and governance concerns and costs related thereto;
The ability to successfully operate electric generating facilities and deliver electricity to customers including direct or indirect effects to the company resulting from an incident that affects the United States electric grid or generating resources;
Operational interruptions to our natural gas distribution and transmission activities;
The availability of adequate interstate pipeline transportation capacity and natural gas supply;
The impact on facilities and business from a terrorist or other attack, war, vandalism, cybersecurity threats, data security breaches, operational events, information technology failures or other catastrophic events, such as fires, explosions, pandemic health events or other similar occurrences;
The inherent risks associated with the operation of nuclear facilities, including environmental, health, safety, regulatory and financial risks, including the financial stability of third-party service providers;
The timing and extent of changes in commodity prices and interest rates and the ability to recover such costs through the regulatory process, where appropriate, and their impact on liquidity positions and the value of underlying assets;
The results of financing efforts, including the ability to obtain financing on favorable terms, which can be affected by various factors, including credit ratings, interest rate fluctuations, compliance with debt covenants and conditions, an individual utility’s generation mix, and general market and economic conditions;
Credit ratings of the Duke Energy Registrants may be different from what is expected;
Declines in the market prices of equity and fixed-income securities and resultant cash funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans, other post-retirement benefit plans and nuclear decommissioning trust funds;





FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

Construction and development risks associated with the completion of the Duke Energy Registrants’ capital investment projects, including risks related to financing, timing and receipt of necessary regulatory approvals, obtaining and complying with terms of permits, meeting construction budgets and schedules and satisfying operating and environmental performance standards, as well as the ability to recover costs from customers in a timely manner, or at all;

Changes in rules for regional transmission organizations, including changes in rate designs and new and evolving capacity markets, and risks related to obligations created by the default of other participants;
Employee workforce factors, including the potential inability to attract and retain key personnel;
The ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions to Duke Energy Corporation holding company (the Parent);
The performance of projects undertaken by our nonregulated businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities;
The effect of accounting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies;
The impact of United States tax legislation to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows and our credit ratings;
The impacts from potential impairments of goodwill or equity method investment carrying values; and
The ability to implement our business strategy, including enhancing existing technology systems.
The ability to control operation and maintenance costs;
The level of creditworthiness of counterparties to transactions;
The ability to obtain adequate insurance at acceptable costs;
Employee workforce factors, including the potential inability to attract and retain key personnel;
The ability of subsidiaries to pay dividends or distributions to Duke Energy Corporation holding company (the Parent);
The performance of projects undertaken by our nonregulated businesses and the success of efforts to invest in and develop new opportunities, as well as the successful sale of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups;
The effect of accounting and reporting pronouncements issued periodically by accounting standard-setting bodies and the SEC;
The impact of United States tax legislation to our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows and our credit ratings;
The impacts from potential impairments of goodwill or equity method investment carrying values;
Asset or business acquisitions and dispositions may not yield the anticipated benefits;
The actions of activist shareholders could disrupt our operations, impact our ability to execute on our business strategy, or cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock; and
Additional risks and uncertainties are identified and discussed in the Duke Energy Registrants' reports filed with the SEC and available at the SEC's website at sec.gov. In light of these risks, uncertainties and assumptions, the events described in the forward-looking statements might not occur or might occur to a different extent or at a different time than described. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made and the Duke Energy Registrants expressly disclaim an obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.




GLOSSARY OF TERMS


Glossary of Terms 
The following terms or acronyms used in this Form 10-K are defined below:
Term or AcronymDefinition
Term or AcronymDefinition
2013 SettlementRevised and Restated Stipulation and Settlement Agreement approved in November 2013 among Duke Energy Florida, the Florida Office of Public Counsel and other customer advocates
2017 SettlementSecond Revised and Restated Settlement Agreement in 2017 among Duke Energy Florida, the Florida Office of Public Counsel and other customer advocates, which replaces and supplants the 2013 Settlement
ACE2021 SettlementAffordable CleanSettlement Agreement in 2021 among Duke Energy Florida, the Florida Office of Public Counsel, the Florida Industrial Power Users Group, White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. d/b/a PSC Phosphate and NUCOR Steel Florida, Inc.
ACPAtlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC, a limited liability company owned by Dominion and Duke Energy and Southern Company Gas
ACP pipelineThe approximately 600-mile proposedcanceled interstate natural gas pipeline
AFUDCAFSAvailable for Sale
AFUDCAllowance for funds used during construction
AFSAMIAvailable for Sale
ALJAdministrative Law Judge
AMIAdvanced Metering Infrastructure
AMTAlternative Minimum Tax
AOCIAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
AROAsset Retirement Obligation
ATMAt-the-market
Audit CommitteeAudit Committee of the Board of Directors
BeckjordBeckjord Generating Station
Belews CreekBelews Creek Steam Station
BisonBison Insurance Company Limited
Board of DirectorsDuke Energy Board of Directors
BrunswickBrunswick Nuclear Plant
CardinalCardinal Pipeline Company, LLC
CatawbaCatawba Nuclear Station
CCCombined Cycle
CCRCoal Combustion Residuals
CinergyCEP RiderDuke Energy Ohio's Capital Expenditure Program Rider
CinergyCinergy Corp. (collectively with its subsidiaries)
Citrus County CCCitrus County Combined Cycle Facility
CO2
Carbon Dioxide
Coal Ash ActNorth Carolina Coal Ash Management Act of 2014
the CompanycompanyDuke Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries
ConstitutionCommercial Renewables Disposal GroupsConstitution Pipeline Company, LLCCommercial Renewables business segment, excluding the offshore wind contract for Carolina Long Bay, marketed as two separate disposal groups, the utility-scale solar and wind group and the distributed generation group
CPCNCOVID-19Coronavirus Disease 2019
CPCNCertificate of Public Convenience and Necessity
CRCCinergy Receivables Company LLC
Crystal River Unit 3Crystal River Unit 3 Nuclear Plant
CWAClean Water Act




GLOSSARY OF TERMSCT


Combustion Turbine
DATCDuke-American Transmission Co.Company, LLC
D.C. Circuit CourtDECONU.S. CourtA method of Appealsdecommissioning in which structures, systems, and components that contain radioactive contamination are removed from a site and safely disposed at a commercially operated low-level waste disposal facility, or decontaminated to a level that permits the site to be released for the District of Columbiaunrestricted use shortly after it ceases operation
DEFRDuke Energy Florida Receivables, LLC
DeloitteDeloitte & Touche LLP, and the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu and their respective affiliates
DEPRDuke Energy Progress Receivables, LLC
DERFDuke Energy Receivables Finance Company, LLC


DETMGLOSSARY OF TERMSDuke Energy Trading and Marketing, LLC
DOE
DOEU.S. Department of Energy
DominionDominion Energy, Inc.
DRIPDthDividend Reinvestment ProgramDekatherms
DthDekatherms
Duke EnergyDuke Energy Corporation (collectively with its subsidiaries)
Duke Energy CarolinasDuke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Duke Energy FloridaDuke Energy Florida, LLC
Duke Energy IndianaDuke Energy Indiana, LLC
Duke Energy KentuckyDuke Energy Kentucky, Inc.
Duke Energy OhioDuke Energy Ohio, Inc.
Duke Energy ProgressDuke Energy Progress, LLC
Duke Energy RegistrantsDuke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont
East BendEast Bend Generating Station
EEEDITEnergy efficiencyExcess deferred income tax
EPAEEEnergy efficiency
EPAU.S. Environmental Protection Agency
EPCEPSEngineering, Procurement and Construction agreement
EPSEarnings Per Share
ETREffective tax rate
EU&IElectric Utilities and Infrastructure
Exchange ActSecurities Exchange Act of 1934
FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board
FERCFederal Energy Regulatory Commission
FESFirstEnergy Solutions Corp.
Form S-3Registration statement
FPSCFlorida Public Service Commission
FTRFinancial transmission rights
FluorGAAPFluor Enterprises, Inc.
FV-NIFair value through net income
GAAPGenerally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States
GAAP Reported EarningsNet Income Available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
GAAP Reported EPSDilutedBasic EPS Available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
GHGGreenhouse Gas
GWhGigawatt-hours




GLOSSARY OF TERMSGIC


GIC Private Limited, Singapore's sovereign wealth fund and an experienced investor in U.S. infrastructure
GU&IGas Utilities and Infrastructure
GWhGigawatt-hour
Hardy StorageHardy Storage Company, LLC
HarrisShearon Harris Nuclear Plant
HLBVHB 951Hypothetical Liquidation at Book ValueThe Energy Solutions for North Carolina, or House Bill 951, passed in October 2021
IGCCIntegrated Gasification Combined Cycle
IMPAIndiana Municipal Power Agency
IMRIntegrity Management Rider
IRPIntegrated Resource Plans
IRSInternal Revenue Service
ISOIndependent System Operator
ITCInvestment Tax Credit
IURCIndiana Utility Regulatory Commission
Investment TrustsGrantor trusts of Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana
KO TransmissionKO Transmission Company
KPSCKentucky Public Service Commission


LIBORGLOSSARY OF TERMSLondon Interbank Offered Rate
LLC
LLCLimited Liability Company
McGuireMcGuire Nuclear Station
MGPManufactured gas plant
MISOMGP SettlementStipulation and Recommendation filed jointly by Duke Energy Ohio the staff of the PUCO, the Office of the
Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Ohio Energy Group on August 31, 2021
MISOMidcontinent Independent System Operator, Inc.
MMBtuMTBEMillion British Thermal Unit
MTBEMethyl tertiary butyl ether
MTEPMWMISO Transmission Expansion PlanningMegawatt
MWMWhMegawattMegawatt-hour
MWhMYRPMegawatt-hourMultiyear rate plans
NCDEQNorth Carolina Department of Environmental Quality
NCEMCNCUCNorth Carolina Electric Membership Corporation
NCEMPANorth Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency
NCUCNorth Carolina Utilities Commission
NDTFNuclear decommissioning trust funds
New Source ReviewClean Air Act program that requires industrial facilities to install modern pollution control equipment when they are built or when making a change that increases emissions significantly
NMCNational Methanol Company
NOLNet operating loss
NOx
Nitrogen oxide
NPNSNormal purchase/normal sale
NRCU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
NYSENew York Stock Exchange
OconeeOconee Nuclear Station
OPEBOther Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations




GLOSSARY OF TERMSNMC


National Methanol Company
OPEB AssetsNOLOther post-retirement plan assets are comprised of the Retirement Plan of Piedmont 401(h) Medical Plan, and the following VEBA Trusts: Duke Energy Corporation Employee Benefits Trust, Piedmont Natural Gas Company 501(c)(9) Trust for Retired Bargaining Unit Employees and the Piedmont Natural Gas Company 501(c)(9) Trust for Retired Non-Bargaining Unit EmployeesNet operating loss
ORSNPNSOffice of Regulatory StaffNormal purchase/normal sale
OTTINRCOther-than-temporary impairmentU.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
OVECNYSENew York Stock Exchange
OconeeOconee Nuclear Station
OPEBOther Post-Retirement Benefit Obligations
OVECOhio Valley Electric Corporation
the ParentDuke Energy Corporation holding company
PGAPBRPerformance-based regulation
PGAPurchased Gas Adjustments
PHMSAPipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration
PiedmontPiedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Pine NeedlePine Needle LNG Company, LLC
PioneerPioneer Transmission, LLC
PJMPJM Interconnection, LLC
PMPAPiedmont Municipal Power Agency
PPAPISCCPost-in-service carrying costs
PPAPurchase Power Agreement
Progress EnergyProgress Energy, Inc.
PSCSCPublic Service Commission of South Carolina
PTCProduction Tax Credits
PUCOPublic Utilities Commission of Ohio
PURPAPublic Utility Regulatory Policies Act of 1978
QFQualifying Facility
RCARECRevolving Credit Agreement
RFPRequests for Proposal
RECRenewable Energy Certificate
REC SolarREC Solar Corp.
Relative TSRTSR of Duke Energy stock relative to a predefined peer group
RobinsonRobinson Nuclear Plant
RSUROEReturn of equity
ROURight-of-use
RSURestricted Stock Unit


RTOGLOSSARY OF TERMS
RTORegional Transmission Organization
Sabal TrailSabal Trail Transmission, LLC
SAFSTORA method of decommissioning in which a nuclear facility is placed and maintained in a condition that allows the facility to be safely stored and subsequently decontaminated to levels that permit release for unrestricted use
SECSecurities and Exchange Commission
SELCS&PSouthern Environmental Law Center
Segment IncomeIncome from continuing operations net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests and preferred stock dividends
SO2
Sulfur dioxide
Spectra CapitalSpectra Energy Capital, LLC
S&PStandard & Poor’s Rating Services
State utility commissionsNCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, PUCO, IURC, KPSC and TPUC (Collectively)




GLOSSARY OF TERMS


State electric utility commissionsNCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, PUCO, IURC and KPSC (Collectively)
State gas utility commissionsNCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC (Collectively)
Subsidiary RegistrantsDuke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont
SuttonL.V. Sutton Combined Cycle Plant
the Tax ActTax Cuts and Jobs Act
TPUCTennessee Public Utility Commission
TSRTotal shareholder return
U.S.United States
VEBAVIEVoluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association
VIEVariable Interest Entity
WACCWeighted Average Cost of Capital
WNAWeather normalization adjustment
W.S. Lee CCWilliam States Lee Combined Cycle Facility
WVPAWabash Valley Power Association, Inc.





BUSINESSWVPAWabash Valley Power Association, Inc.



BUSINESS
ITEM 1. BUSINESS
DUKE ENERGY
General
Duke Energy was incorporated on May 3, 2005, and is an energy company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, subject to regulation by the FERC and other regulatory agencies listed below. Duke Energy operates in the U.S. primarily through its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Certain Duke Energy subsidiaries are also Subsidiary Registrants, including Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont. When discussing Duke Energy’s consolidated financial information, it necessarily includes the results of its separate Subsidiary Registrants, which along with Duke Energy, are collectively referred to as the Duke Energy Registrants.
The Duke Energy Registrants electronically file reports with the SEC, including Annual Reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and amendments to such reports.
The SEC maintains an internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at sec.gov. Additionally, information about the Duke Energy Registrants, including reports filed with the SEC, is available through Duke Energy’s website at duke-energy.com. Such reports are accessible at no charge and are made available as soon as reasonably practicable after such material is filed with or furnished to the SEC.
Business Segments
Duke Energy's segment structure includes threetwo reportable business segments: Electric Utilities and Infrastructure (EU&I) and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables.(GU&I). The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other. Commercial Renewables is reported as discontinued operations and is no longer a reportable segment beginning in the fourth quarter of 2022. See Note 2 for further details. Duke Energy's chief operating decision-maker routinely reviews financial information about each of these business segments in deciding how to allocate resources and evaluate the performance of the business. For additional information on each of these business segments, including financial and geographic information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.” The following sections describe the business and operations of each of Duke Energy’s business segments, as well as Other.
ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I conducts operations primarily through the regulated public utilities of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Indiana and Duke Energy Ohio. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I provides retail electric service through the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity to approximately 7.88.2 million customers within the Southeast and Midwest regions of the U.S. The service territory is approximately 91,00092,000 square miles across six states with a total estimated population of 25 million people.26 million. The operations include electricity sold wholesale to municipalities, electric cooperative utilities and other load-serving entities. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
During 2021, Duke Energy executed an agreement providing for an investment by an affiliate of GIC in Duke Energy Indiana in exchange for a 19.9% minority interest issued by Duke Energy Indiana Holdco, LLC, the holding company for Duke Energy Indiana. The transaction was completed following two closings. Additionally, in November 2022, Duke Energy committed to a plan to sell the Commercial Renewables business segment, excluding the offshore wind contract for Carolina Long Bay, which was moved to EU&I. See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Dispositions," for additional information.
EU&I is also a joint owner in certain electric transmission projects. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has a 50% ownership interest in DATC, a partnership with American Transmission Company, formed to design, build and operate transmission infrastructure. DATC owns 72% of the transmission service rights to Path 15, an 84-mile transmission line in central California. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I also has a 50% ownership interest in Pioneer, which builds, owns and operates electric transmission facilities in North America. The following map shows the service territory for Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I as of December 31, 2019.2022.

9




BUSINESS


duk-20221231_g2.jpg
The electric operations and investments in projects are subject to the rules and regulations of the FERC, the NRC, the NCUC, the PSCSC, the FPSC, the IURC, the PUCO and the KPSC.
The following table represents the distribution of GWh billed sales by customer class for the year ended December 31, 2019.
2022.
Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
EnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Carolinas
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
CarolinasProgressFloridaOhioIndiana
Residential32% 27% 49% 37% 29%Residential33 %26 %47 %38 %30 %
General service33% 23% 37% 38% 26%General service33 %22 %34 %38 %27 %
Industrial24% 15% 7% 23% 32%Industrial23 %16 %8 %22 %28 %
Total retail sales89% 65% 93% 98% 87%Total retail sales89 %64 %89 %98 %85 %
Wholesale and other sales11% 35% 7% 2% 13%Wholesale and other sales11 %36 %11 %2 %15 %
Total sales100% 100% 100% 100% 100%Total sales100 %100 %100 %100 %100 %
The number of residential and general service customers within the Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I service territory is expected to increase over time. While economic conditionsSales growth is expected within the service territory remain strong, sales growthbut continues to be influencedimpacted by adoption of energy efficiencies and self-generation. ResidentialMigration into EU&I’s service territories and continued remote work contributed to higher residential sales for 2019 comparedvolumes in 2022 while higher data center usage contributed to 2018 declined.growth in commercial sales volumes. This was partially offset by lower industrial sales volumes impacted by certain automotive customers experiencing supply chain constraints along with reduced volumes in the steel sector. The continued adoption of more efficient structuresimpact on customer's usage from these factors and appliancesother potential economic dynamics continues to be monitored. Over the longer time frame, it is still expected to continue to drive average usage per customer lower over time. However,that the continued adoption of more efficient housing and appliances is expected towill have a negative impact on average usage per residential customer over time.
Seasonality and the Impact of Weather
Revenues and costs are influenced by seasonal weather patterns. Peak sales of electricity occur during the summer and winter months, which results in higher revenue and cash flows during these periods. By contrast, lower sales of electricity occur during the spring and fall, allowing for scheduled plant maintenance. Residential and general service customers are more impacted by weather than industrial customers. Estimated weather impacts are based on actual current period weather compared to normal weather conditions. Normal weather conditions are defined as the long-term average of actual historical weather conditions.

10




BUSINESS


The estimated impact of weather on earnings is based on the temperature variances from a normal condition and customers’ historic usage patterns. The methodology used to estimate the impact of weather does not consider all variables that may impact customer response to weather conditions such as humidity in the summer or wind chill in the winter. The precision of this estimate may also be impacted by applying long-term weather trends to shorter-term periods.
Heating-degree
10

BUSINESS
Heating degree days measure the variation in weather based on the extent the average daily temperature falls below a base temperature. Cooling-degreeCooling degree days measure the variation in weather based on the extent the average daily temperature rises above the base temperature. Each degree of temperature below the base temperature counts as one heating-degreeheating degree day and each degree of temperature above the base temperature counts as one cooling-degreecooling degree day.
Competition
Retail
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s businesses operate as the sole supplier of electricity within their service territories, with the exception of Ohio, which has a competitive electricity supply market for generation service. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I owns and operates facilities necessary to generate, transmit, distribute and sell electricity. Services are priced by state commission approvedcommission-approved rates designed to include the costs of providing these services and a reasonable return on invested capital. This regulatory policy is intended to provide safe and reliable electricity at fair prices.
In Ohio, Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I conducts competitive auctions for electricity supply. The cost of energy purchased through these auctions is recovered from retail customers. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I earns retail margin in Ohio on the transmission and distribution of electricity, but not on the cost of the underlying energy.
Competition in the regulated electric distribution business is primarily from the development and deployment of alternative energy sources including on-site generation from industrial customers and distributed generation, such as private solar, at residential, general service and/or industrial customer sites.
Wholesale
Duke Energy competes with other utilities and merchant generators for bulk power sales, sales to municipalities and cooperatives and wholesale transactions under primarily cost-based contracts approved by FERC. The principal factors in competing for these sales are availability of capacity and power, reliability of service and price. Prices are influenced primarily by market conditions and fuel costs.
Increased competition in the wholesale electric utility industry and the availability of transmission access could affect Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s load forecasts, plans for power supply and wholesale energy sales and related revenues. Wholesale energy sales will be impacted by the extent to which additional generation is available to sell to the wholesale market and the ability of Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I to attract new customers and to retain existing customers.
Energy Capacity and Resources
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I owns approximately 51,14449,870 MW of generation capacity. For additional information on owned generation facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.”
Energy and capacity are also supplied through contracts with other generators and purchased on the open market. Factors that could cause Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I to purchase power for its customers may include, but are not limited to, generating plant outages, extreme weather conditions, generation reliability, demand growth and price. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has interconnections and arrangements with its neighboring utilities to facilitate planning, emergency assistance, sale and purchase of capacity and energy and reliability of power supply.
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s generation portfolio is a balanced mix of energy resources having different operating characteristics and fuel sources designed to provide energy at the lowest possible cost to meet its obligation to serve retail customers. All options, including owned generation resources and purchased power opportunities, are continually evaluated on a real-time basis to select and dispatch the lowest-cost resources available to meet system load requirements.

11




BUSINESS


Sources of Electricity
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I relies principally on natural gas, nuclear fuel and coal for its generation of electricity. The following table lists sources of electricity and fuel costs for the three years ended December 31, 2019.
2022.
Cost of Delivered Fuel per Net
  Cost of Delivered Fuel per NetGeneration by SourceKilowatt-hour Generated (Cents)
Generation by Source Kilowatt-hour Generated (Cents)202220212020202220212020
2019
 2018
 2017
 2019
 2018
 2017
Natural gas and oil(a)
29.2% 26.2% 23.6% 2.96
 3.57
 2.85
Natural gas and fuel oil(a)
Natural gas and fuel oil(a)
34.2 %31.8 %31.3 %6.35 3.89 2.55 
Nuclear(a)
28.6% 26.0% 27.8% 0.60
 0.50
 0.69
Nuclear(a)
26.6 %29.8 %29.6 %0.58 0.58 0.58 
Coal(a)
21.6% 24.4% 27.4% 3.08
 2.82
 2.72
Coal(a)
13.5 %18.2 %18.1 %3.43 2.84 2.99 
All fuels (cost-based on weighted average)(a)
79.4% 76.6% 78.8% 2.14
 2.29
 2.04
All fuels (cost based on weighted average)(a)
All fuels (cost based on weighted average)(a)
74.3 %79.8 %79.0 %3.75 2.42 1.91 
Hydroelectric and solar(b)
1.2% 1.3% 0.7%      
Hydroelectric and solar(b)
1.5 %1.5 %1.9 %
Total generation80.6% 77.9% 79.5%      Total generation75.8 %81.3 %80.9 %
Purchased power and net interchange19.4% 22.1% 20.5%      Purchased power and net interchange24.2 %18.7 %19.1 %
Total sources of energy100.0% 100.0% 100.0%      Total sources of energy100.0 %100.0 %100.0 %
(a)Statistics related to all fuels reflect Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's ownership interest in jointly owned generation facilities.
(b)Generating figures are net of output required to replenish pumped storage facilities during off-peak periods. 
(a)    Statistics related to all fuels reflect EU&I's public utility ownership interest in jointly owned generation facilities.
(b)    Generating figures are net of output required to replenish pumped-storage facilities during off-peak periods. 
Natural Gas and Fuel Oil
Natural gas and fuel oil supply, transportation and storage for Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s generation fleet is purchased under standard industry agreements from various suppliers, including Piedmont. Natural gas supply agreements typically provide for a percentage of forecasted burns being procured over time, with varied expiration dates. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure believes it has access to an adequate supply of natural gas and fuel oil for the reasonably foreseeable future.
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
11

BUSINESS
EU&I has certain dual-fuel generating facilities that can operate utilizing both natural gas and fuel oil. The cost of Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s natural gas and fuel oil is fixed price or determined by published market prices as reported in certain industry publications, plus any transportation and freight costs. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana use derivative instruments to manage a portion of their exposure to price fluctuations for natural gas. For Duke Energy Florida there is currently anhas temporarily agreed to moratorium with the FPSC on future hedging ofnot hedge natural gas prices.prices, but retains an ability to propose hedging again in annual fuel docket filings.
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has firm interstate and intrastate natural gas transportation agreements and storage agreements in place to support generation needed for load requirements. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I may purchase additional shorter-term natural gas transportation and utilize natural gas interruptible transportation agreements to support generation needed for load requirements. The Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I natural gas plants are served by various supply zones and multiple pipelines.
Nuclear
The industrial processes for producing nuclear generating fuel generally involve the mining and milling of uranium ore to produce uranium concentrates and services to convert, enrich and fabricate fuel assemblies.
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has contracted for uranium materials and services to fuel its nuclear reactors. Uranium concentrates, conversion services and enrichment services are primarily met through a diversified portfolio of long-term supply contracts. The contracts are diversified by supplier, country of origin and pricing. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I staggers its contracting so that its portfolio of long-term contracts covers the majority of its fuel requirements in the near term and decreasing portions of its fuel requirements over time thereafter. Near-term requirements not met by long-term supply contracts have been and are expected to be fulfilled with spot market purchases. Due to the technical complexities of changing suppliers of fuel fabrication services, Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I generally sourcessource these services to a single domestic supplier on a plant-by-plant basis using multiyear contracts.
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has entered into fuel contracts that cover 100% of its uranium concentrates conversion services and enrichment services requirements through at least 20202024, 100% of its conversion services through at least 2026, 100% of its enrichment services through at least 2026, and cover100% of its fabrication services requirements for these plants through at least 2027. For future requirements not already covered under long-term contracts, Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I believes it will be able to renew contracts as they expire or enter into similar contractual arrangements with other suppliers of nuclear fuel materials and services.

12




BUSINESS


Coal
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I meets its coal demand through a portfolio of long-term purchase contracts and short-term spot market purchase agreements. Large amounts of coal are purchased under long-term contracts with mining operators who mine both underground and at the surface. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I uses spot market purchases to meet coal requirements not met by long-term contracts. Expiration dates for its long-term contracts, which may have various price adjustment provisions and market reopeners, range from 20202023 to 20222027 for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Indiana, 2023 to 2024 for Duke Energy Progress 2020and 2023 to 20212025 for Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Ohio and 2020 to 2025 for Duke Energy Indiana. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureOhio. EU&I expects to renew these contracts or enter into similar contracts with other suppliers as existing contracts expire, though prices will fluctuate over time as coal markets change. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has an adequate supply of coal under contract to meet its hedgingrisk management guidelines regarding projected future consumption. As a result of volatility in natural gas prices and the associated impacts on coal-fired dispatch within the generation fleet, coal inventories will continue to fluctuate. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I continues to actively manage its portfolio and has worked with suppliers to obtain increased flexibility in its coal contracts.
Coal purchased for the Carolinas is primarily produced from mines in Central Appalachia, Northern Appalachia and the Illinois Basin. Coal purchased for Florida is primarily produced from mines in Colorado and the Illinois Basin. Coal purchased for Kentucky is produced from mines along the Ohio River in Illinois, Ohio, West Virginia and Pennsylvania. Coal purchased for Indiana is primarily produced in Indiana and Illinois. There are adequate domestic coal reserves to serve EU&I's coal generation needs through end of life. The current average sulfur content of coal purchased by Electric Utilities and Infrastructure is between 1.5%0.5% and 2%3.5% for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, and between 2%0.5% and 3%4% for Duke Energy Florida, between 2.5% and 3% for Duke Energy Ohio and between 1.5% and 3% for Duke Energy Indiana. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure'sEU&I's environmental controls, in combination with the use of SOsulfur dioxide (SO2) emission allowances, enable Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I to satisfy current SO2 emission limitations for its existing facilities.
Purchased Power
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I purchases a portion of its capacity and system requirements through purchase obligations, leases and purchase capacity contracts. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I believes it can obtain adequate purchased power capacity to meet future system load needs. However, during periods of high demand, the price and availability of purchased power may be significantly affected.
The following table summarizes purchased power for the previous three years:
202220212020
Purchase obligations and leases (in millions of MWh)(a)
41.2 36.0 32.7 
Purchase capacity under contract (in MW)(b)
4,028 4,259 4,716 
 2019
 2018
 2017
Purchase obligations and leases (in millions of MWh)(a)
34.8
 21.3
 17.7
Purchase capacity under contract (in MW)(b)
4,238
 4,025
 4,028
(a)    Represents approximately 16% of total system requirements for 2022, 14% for 2021 and 13% for 2020.
(a)Represents approximately 14% for 2019 and 7% for 2018 and 2017 of total system requirements.
(b)For 2019, 2018 and 2017 these agreements include approximately 412 MW of firm capacity under contract by Duke Energy Florida with QFs.
(b)    For 2022, 2021 and 2020, these agreements include approximately 412 MW of firm capacity under contract by Duke Energy Florida with QFs.
Inventory
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I must maintain an adequate stock of fuel and materials and supplies in order to ensure continuous operation of generating facilities and reliable delivery to customers. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the inventory balance for Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I was approximately $3$3.4 billion. For additional information on inventory, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies.”
12

BUSINESS
Ash Basin Management
During 2015, EPA issued regulations related to the management of CCR from power plants. These regulations classify CCR as nonhazardous waste under the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) and apply to electric generating sites with new and existing landfills and new and existing surface impoundments and establishesestablish requirements regarding landfill design, structural integrity design and assessment criteria for surface impoundments, groundwater monitoring, protection and remedial procedures and other operational and reporting procedures for the disposal and management of CCR. In addition to the federal regulations, CCR landfills and surface impoundments (ash basins or impoundments) will continue to be regulated by existing state laws, regulations and permits, includingsuch as the North Carolina Coal Ash Management Act in North Carolina.of 2014 (Coal Ash Act).
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I has and will periodically submit to applicable authorities required site-specific coal ash impoundment remediation or closure plans. TheseClosure plans must be approved and all associated permits must be approvedissued before any work can begin. Closure activities have begun in all of Duke Energy's jurisdictions. Excavation began in 2015 at the four sites specified as high priority by the Coal Ash Act and at the W.S. Lee Steam Station site in South Carolina in connection with other legal requirements. Excavation at these sites involves movement of CCR materials to off-site locations for use as structural fill, to appropriate engineered off-site or on-site lined landfills or conversion of the ash for reuse in an approved beneficial use.application. Duke Energy has completed excavation of coal ash regulated by the Coal Ash Act at three of the four high-priority North Carolina sites. At other sites where CCR management is required, planning and closure methods have been studied and factored into the estimated retirement and management costs, and closure activities have commenced.
The EPA CCR rule and the Coal Ash Act leavesleave the decision on cost recovery determinations related to closure of coal ash surface impoundments to the normal ratemaking processes before utility regulatory commissions. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy ProgressEnergy's electric utilities have included compliance costs associated with the EPA CCR rulefederal and the Coal Ash Actstate requirements in their respective rate case filings.proceedings. During 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas' and Duke Energy Progress’ wholesale contracts were amended to include the recovery of expenditures related to AROs for the closure of coal ash basins. The amended contracts have retail disallowance parity or provisions limiting challenges to CCR cost recovery actions at FERC. FERC approved the amended wholesale rate schedules in 2017. For additional information on the ash basins and recovery, see Item 7, "Other Matters" and Notes 4, 5 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," "Commitments and Contingencies" and "Asset Retirement Obligations," respectively.

13




BUSINESS


Nuclear Matters
Duke Energy owns, wholly or partially, 11 operating nuclear reactors located at six operating stations. The Crystal River Unit 3 permanently ceased operation in February 2013. Nuclear insurance includes: nuclear liability coverage; property damage coverage; nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning coverage; and accidental outage coverage for losses in the event of a major accidental outage. Joint owners reimburse Duke Energy for certain expenses associated with nuclear insurance in accordance with joint owner agreements. The Price-Anderson Act requires plant owners to provide for public nuclear liability claims resulting from nuclear incidents to the maximum total financial protection liability, which is approximately $13.9$13.7 billion. For additional information on nuclear insurance, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies.”
Duke Energy has a significant future financial commitment to dispose of spent nuclear fuel and decommission and decontaminate each plant safely. The NCUC, PSCSC and FPSC require Duke Energy to update their cost estimates for decommissioning their nuclear plants every five years.
The following table summarizes the fair value of NDTF investments and the most recent site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost studies. Decommissioning costs are stated in 2018 or 2019 dollars, depending on the year of the cost study, and include costs to decommission plant components not subject to radioactive contamination.
NDTF(a)
 Decommissioning
 
NDTF(a)
Decommissioning
(in millions)December 31, 2019
 December 31, 2018
 
Costs(a)

 Year of Cost Study(in millions)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Costs(a)
Year of Cost Study
Duke Energy$8,140
 $6,720
 $9,152
 2018 and 2019Duke Energy$8,637 $10,401 $9,105 2018 or 2019
Duke Energy Carolinas(b)(c)
4,359
 3,558
 4,365
 2018
Duke Energy Carolinas(b)(c)
4,783 5,759 4,365 2018
Duke Energy Progress(d)
3,047
 2,503
 4,181
 2019
Duke Energy Progress(d)
3,430 4,089 4,181 2019
Duke Energy Florida(e)
734
 659
 606
 2019
Duke Energy Florida(e)
424 553 559 N/A
(a)Amounts for Progress Energy equal the sum of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
(b)Decommissioning cost for Duke Energy Carolinas reflects its ownership interest in jointly owned reactors. Other joint owners are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their interest in the reactors.
(c)Duke Energy Carolinas' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2018 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019. A new funding study was also completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019.
(d)Duke Energy Progress' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study, which was completed in 2019, is expected to be filed with the NCUC and PSCSC during the first quarter of 2020. Duke Energy Progress is expected to file an updated funding study with NCUC and PSCSC in the third quarter of 2020.
(e)During 2019, Duke Energy Florida reached an agreement to transfer decommissioning work for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party. The agreement requires regulatory approval from the NRC and the FPSC.
(a)    Amounts for Progress Energy equal the sum of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
(b)    Decommissioning cost for Duke Energy Carolinas reflects its ownership interest in jointly owned reactors. Other joint owners are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their interest in the reactors.
(c)    Duke Energy Carolinas' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2018 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019. A new funding study was also completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019.
(d)    Duke Energy Progress' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2019 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in March 2020. Duke Energy Progress also completed a funding study, which was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in July 2020. In October 2021, Duke Energy Progress filed the 2019 nuclear decommissioning cost study with the FERC, as well as a revised date schedule for decommissioning expense to be collected from wholesale customers. The FERC accepted the filing, as filed on December 9, 2021.
(e)    During 2019, Duke Energy Florida reached an agreement to transfer decommissioning work for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party and decommissioning costs are based on the agreement with this third party rather than a cost study. Regulatory approval was received from the NRC and the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters,” for more information.
The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC and FERC have allowed Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I to recover estimated decommissioning costs through retail and wholesale rates over the expected remaining service periods of their nuclear stations. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I believes the decommissioning costs being recovered through rates, when coupled with the existing fund balances and expected fund earnings, will be sufficient to provide for the cost of future decommissioning. For additional information, see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Asset Retirement Obligations.”
13

BUSINESS
The Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 (as amended) provides the framework for development by the federal government of interim storage and permanent disposal facilities for high-level radioactive waste materials. The government has not yet developed a storage facility or disposal capacity, so Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I will continue to store spent fuel on its reactor sites.
Under federal law, the DOE is responsible for the selection and construction of a facility for the permanent disposal of spent nuclear fuel and high-level radioactive waste. The DOE terminated the project to license and develop a geologic repository at Yucca Mountain, Nevada in 2010, and is currently taking no action to fulfill its responsibilities to dispose of spent fuel.
Until the DOE begins to accept the spent nuclear fuel, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida will continue to safely manage their spent nuclear fuel. Under current regulatory guidelines, Harris has sufficient storage capacity in its spent fuel pools through the expiration of its renewed operating license. With certain modifications and approvals by the NRC to expand the on-site dry cask storage facilities, spent nuclear fuel dry storage facilities will be sufficient to provide storage space of spent fuel through the expiration of the operating licenses, including any license renewals, for Brunswick, Catawba, McGuire, Oconee and Robinson. Crystal River Unit 3 ceased operation in 2013 and was placed in a SAFSTOR condition in January 2018. As of January 2018, all spent fuel at Crystal River Unit 3 has been transferred from the spent fuel pool to dry storage at an on-site independent spent fuel storage installation. During 2020, the NRC and the FPSC approved an agreement to transfer ownership of spent fuel for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters,” for more information.
The nuclear power industry faces uncertainties with respect to the cost and long-term availability of disposal sites for spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste, compliance with changing regulatory requirements, capital outlays for modifications and new plant construction.

14




BUSINESS


Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I is subject to the jurisdiction of the NRC for the design, construction and operation of its nuclear generating facilities. The following table includes the current year of expiration of nuclear operating licenses for nuclear stations in operation. During 2019,In June 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a subsequent license renewal application for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission to renew ONS's operating license for an additional 20 years. Duke Energy has announced its intention to seek 20-year operating license renewals for each of the reactors it operates in Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress.
See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.
UnitYear of Expiration
Duke Energy Carolinas
Catawba Units 1 and 22043
McGuire Unit 12041
McGuire Unit 22043
Oconee Units 1 and 22033
Oconee Unit 32034
Duke Energy Progress
Brunswick Unit 12036
Brunswick Unit 22034
Harris2046
Robinson2030
The NRC has acknowledged permanent cessation of operation and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessel at Crystal River Unit 3. Therefore, the license no longer authorizes operation of the reactor. For additional information on nuclear decommissioning activity, see Notes 4 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Asset Retirement Obligations," respectively.
Regulation
State
The state electric utility commissions approve rates for Duke Energy's retail electric service within their respective states. The state electric utility commissions, to varying degrees, have authority over the construction and operation of Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s generating facilities. CPCNs issued by the state electric utility commissions, as applicable, authorize Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I to construct and operate its electric facilities and to sell electricity to retail and wholesale customers. Prior approval from the relevant state electric utility commission is required for the entities within Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I to issue securities. The underlying concept of utility ratemaking is to set rates at a level that allows the utility to collect revenues equal to its cost of providing service plus earn a reasonable rate of return on its invested capital, including equity.
In addition to rates approved in base rate cases, each of the state electric utility commissions allow recovery of certain costs through various cost-recoverycost recovery clauses to the extent the respective commission determines in periodic hearings that such costs, including any past over or under-recovered costs, are prudent.
Fuel, fuel-related costs and certain purchased power costs are eligible for recovery by Electric Utilities and Infrastructure. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I. EU&I uses coal, hydroelectric, natural gas, oil, renewable generation and nuclear fuel to generate electricity, thereby maintaining a diverse fuel mix that helps mitigate the impact of cost increases in any one fuel. Due to the associated regulatory treatment and the method allowed for recovery, changes in fuel costs from year to year have no material impact on operating results of Electric Utilities and Infrastructure,EU&I, unless a commission finds a portion of such costs to have been imprudent. However, delays between the expenditure for fuel costs and recovery from customers can adversely impact the timing of cash flows of Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.

EU&I.
15
14




BUSINESS


The table below reflects significant electric rate case applications approved and effective in the past three years orand applications currently pending approval.
 
Regulatory
Body
Annual
Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions)
Return
on
Equity
Equity
Component of
Capital Structure
Effective
Date
Approved Rate Cases:     
Duke Energy Carolinas 2018 South Carolina Rate CasePSCSC$45
9.5%53%6/1/2019
Duke Energy Progress 2018 South Carolina Rate CasePSCSC29
9.5%53%6/1/2019
Duke Energy Ohio 2017 Ohio Electric Rate CasePUCO(19)9.84%50.75%1/2/2019
Duke Energy Carolinas 2017 North Carolina Rate CaseNCUC(73)9.9%52%8/1/2018
Duke Energy Kentucky 2017 Kentucky Electric Rate CaseKPSC8
9.725%49%5/1/2018
Duke Energy Progress 2017 North Carolina Rate CaseNCUC151
9.9%52%3/16/2018
Duke Energy Progress 2016 South Carolina Rate CasePSCSC(a)
10.1%53%1/1/2017
      
Pending Rate Cases:     
Duke Energy Carolinas 2019 North Carolina Rate CaseNCUC$291
10.3%53%8/1/2020
Duke Energy Progress 2019 North Carolina Rate CaseNCUC464
10.3%53%9/1/2020
Duke Energy Kentucky 2019 Kentucky Electric Rate CaseKPSC46
9.8%48.2%Q2 2020
Duke Energy Indiana 2019 Indiana Rate CaseIURC(b)
10.4%53%mid 2020
Regulatory
Body
Annual
Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions)
Return
on
Equity
Equity
Component of
Capital Structure
Effective
Date
Approved Rate Cases:
Duke Energy Progress 2022 South Carolina Rate CasePSCSC$52 9.6 %52.43 %4/1/2023
Duke Energy Ohio 2021 Ohio Electric Rate CasePUCO23 9.5 %50.5 %1/3/2023
Duke Energy Progress 2019 North Carolina Rate CaseNCUC178 9.6 %52 %6/1/2021
Duke Energy Carolinas 2019 North Carolina Rate CaseNCUC33 9.6 %52 %6/1/2021
Duke Energy Indiana 2019 Indiana Rate Case(a)
IURC146 9.7 %54 %7/30/2020
Duke Energy Kentucky 2019 Kentucky Electric Rate CaseKPSC24 9.25 %48.23 %5/1/2020
Pending Rate Cases:
Duke Energy Carolinas 2023 North Carolina Rate Case(b)
NCUC$823 10.4 %53 %1/1/2024
Duke Energy Kentucky 2022 Kentucky Electric Rate CaseKPSC75 10.35 %52.5 %7/15/2023
Duke Energy Progress 2022 North Carolina Rate Case(c)
NCUC615 10.4 %53 %10/1/2023
(a)An increase of approximately $38 million in revenues was effective January 1, 2017, and an additional increase of approximately $19 million in revenues was effective January 1, 2018.
(b)Requests an increase of annualized retail revenues of $352 million beginning in July 2020, and an additional $44 million beginning in April 2021, which include the impacts of the Utility Receipt Tax.
(a)    Step 1 rates are approximately 75% of the total and became effective July 30, 2020. Step 2 rates are approximately 25% of the total rate case increase. They were approved on July 28, 2021, and implemented in August 2021.
(b)    Year 1 rates are approximately 61% of the total. Year 2 rates are approximately 21% of the total rate case increase. Year 3 rates are approximately 18% of the total rate increase.
(c)    Year 1 rates are approximately 53% of the total. Year 2 rates are approximately 25% of the total rate case increase. Year 3 rates are approximately 22% of the total rate increase. Implementation of interim rates is planned for June 1, 2023.
Additionally, in January 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed a settlement agreement with the FPSC that will allow annual increases to its base rates, an agreed upon return on equity (“ROE”) and includes a base rate stay-out provision through 2024, among other provisions. The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021, issuing an order on June 4, 2021. Revised customer rates became effective January 1, 2022, with subsequent base rate increases effective January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024. For more information on rate matters and other regulatory proceedings, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters.”
Federal
The FERC approves Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’sEU&I’s cost-based rates for electric sales to certain power and transmission wholesale customers. Regulations of FERC and the state electric utility commissions govern access to regulated electric and other data by nonregulated entities and services provided between regulated and nonregulated energy affiliates. These regulations affect the activities of nonregulated affiliates with Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.EU&I.
RTOs
PJM and MISO are the ISOs and FERC-approved RTOs for the regions in which Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana operate. PJM and MISO operate energy, capacity and other markets, and control the day-to-day operations of bulk power systems through central dispatch.
Duke Energy Ohio is a member of PJM and Duke Energy Indiana is a member of MISO. Transmission owners in these RTOs have turned over control of their transmission facilities and their transmission systems are currently under the dispatch control of the RTOs. Transmission service is provided on a regionwide, open-access basis using the transmission facilities of the RTO members at rates based on the costs of transmission service.
Environmental
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I is subject to the jurisdiction of the EPA and state and local environmental agencies. For a discussion of environmental regulation, see “Environmental Matters” in this section. See the “Other Matters” section of Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis for a discussion about potential Global Climate Change legislation and other EPA regulations under development and the potential impacts such legislation and regulation could have on Duke Energy’s operations.

16




BUSINESS


GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I conducts natural gas operations primarily through the regulated public utilities of Piedmont, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Kentucky. The natural gas operations are subject to the rules and regulations of the NCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, KPSC, TPUC, PHMSA and the FERC. Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I serves residential, commercial, industrial and power generation natural gas customers, including customers served by municipalities who are wholesale customers. Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I has over 1.6 million total customers, including 1.1 million customers located in North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, and an additional 535,000550,000 customers located within southwestern Ohio and northern Kentucky. In the Carolinas, Ohio and Kentucky, the service areas are comprised of numerous cities, towns and communities. In Tennessee, the service area is the metropolitan area of Nashville. The following map shows the service territory and investments in operating and proposed midstream propertiespipelines for Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I as of December 31, 2019.2022.
servicemap2019gas001.jpg
15

BUSINESS
duk-20221231_g3.jpg
The number of residential, commercial and industrial customers within the Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I service territory is expected to increase over time. Average usage per residential customer is expected to remain flat or decline for the foreseeable future; however, decoupled rates in North Carolina and various rate design mechanisms in other jurisdictions partially mitigate the impact of the declining usage per customer on overall profitability.
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I also owns, operates and has investments in various pipeline transmission projects, renewable natural gas projects and natural gas storage facilities.

17




BUSINESS


Natural Gas for Retail Distribution
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I is responsible for the distribution of natural gas to retail customers in its North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio and Kentucky service territories. Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’sGU&I’s natural gas procurement strategy is to contract primarily with major and independent producers and marketers for natural gas supply. It also purchases a diverse portfolio of transportation and storage service from interstate pipelines. This strategy allows Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I to assure reliable natural gas supply and transportation for its firm customers during peak winter conditions. When firm pipeline services or contracted natural gas supplies are temporarily not needed due to market demand fluctuations, Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I may release these services and supplies in the secondary market under FERC-approved capacity release provisions or make wholesale secondary market sales. In 2019,2022, firm supply purchase commitment agreements provided 100% of the natural gas supply for both Piedmont and Duke Energy Ohio. Approximately 90% of forecasted demand was under contract prior to the winter heating season, with firm daily spot purchases making up the balance.
16

BUSINESS
Impact of Weather
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I revenues are generally protected from the impact of weather fluctuations due to the regulatory mechanisms that are available in most service territories. In North Carolina, margin decoupling provides protection from both weather and other usage variations like conservation for residential and commercial customer classes.small and medium general service customers. Margin decoupling provides a set revenuemargin per customer independent of actual usage. In South Carolina, Tennessee and Kentucky, weather normalization adjusts revenues either up or down depending on how much warmer or colder than normal a given month has been. Weather normalization adjustments occur from November through March in South Carolina, from October through April in Tennessee and from November through April in Kentucky. Duke Energy Ohio collects most of its non-fuel revenue through a fixed monthly charge that is not impacted by usage fluctuations that result from weather changes or conservation.
Competition
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’sGU&I’s businesses operate as the sole provider of natural gas service within their retail service territories. Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I owns and operates facilities necessary to transport and distribute natural gas. Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I earns retail margin on the transmission and distribution of natural gas and not on the cost of the underlying commodity. Services are priced by state commission approvedcommission-approved rates designed to include the costs of providing these services and a reasonable return on invested capital. This regulatory policy is intended to provide safe and reliable natural gas service at fair prices.
In residential, commercial and industrial customer markets, natural gas distribution operations compete with other companies that supply energy, primarily electric companies, propane and fuel oil dealers, renewable energy providers and coal companies in relation to sources of energy for electric power plants, as well as nuclear energy. A significant competitive factor is price. Gas Utilities and Infrastructure'sGU&I's primary product competition is with electricity for heating, water heating and cooking. Increases in the price of natural gas or decreases in the price of other energy sources could negatively impact competitive position by decreasing the price benefits of natural gas to the consumer. In the case of industrial customers, such as manufacturing plants, adverse economic or market conditions, including higher natural gas costs, could cause these customers to suspend business operations or to use alternative sources of energy in favor of energy sources with lower per-unit costs.
Higher natural gas costs or decreases in the price of other energy sources may allow competition from alternative energy sources for applications that have traditionally used natural gas, encouraging some customers to move away from natural gas-fired equipment to equipment fueled by other energy sources. Competition between natural gas and other forms of energy is also based on efficiency, performance, reliability, safety and other non-price factors. Technological improvements in other energy sources and events that impair the public perception of the non-price attributes of natural gas could erode our competitive advantage. These factors in turn could decrease the demand for natural gas, impair our ability to attract new customers and cause existing customers to switch to other forms of energy or to bypass our systems in favor of alternative competitive sources. This could result in slow or no customer growth and could cause customers to reduce or cease using our product, thereby reducing our ability to make capital expenditures and otherwise grow our business, adversely affecting our earnings.
Pipeline and StorageNatural Gas Investments
Duke Energy, through its Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I segment, is a 47% equity member of ACP, which plans to build and own the proposed ACP pipeline, an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline, regulated by FERC. The ACP pipeline is intended to transport diverse natural gas supplies into southeastern markets. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont, among others, will be customers of ACP. ACP expects mechanical completion of the full project in late 2021 with in-service likely in the first half of 2022. Abnormal weather, work delays (including delays due to judicial or regulatory action) and other conditions may result in cost or schedule modifications, a suspension of AFUDC for ACP and/or impairment charges potentially material to Duke Energy's cash flows, financial position and results of operations. ACP and Duke Energy will continue to consider their options with respect to the foregoing in light of their existing contractual and legal obligations.
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure also has a 7.5% equity ownership interest in Sabal Trail. Sabal Trail is a joint venture that owns the Sabal Trail Natural Gas Pipeline (Sabal Trail pipeline) to transport natural gas to Florida, regulated by FERC. The Sabal Trail phase onePhase I mainline was placed into service in July 2017 and traverses Alabama, Georgia and Florida. The remaining lateral line to the Duke Energy Florida's Citrus County CC was placed into service in March 2018. In May 2019, construction activities began as planned on Phase II of Sabal Trail. Phase II will addTrail went into service in May 2020, adding approximately 200,000 Dth of capacity to the Sabal Trail pipeline and is expected to achieve in-service in May 2020.
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure had a 24% equity ownership interest in Constitution, an interstate pipeline development company formed to develop, construct, own and operate a 124-mile natural gas pipeline and related facilities, regulated by FERC. Constitution was slated to transport natural gas supplies from the Marcellus supply region in northern Pennsylvania to major northeastern markets. As of February 5, 2020, the Constitution partners formally resolved to initiate the dissolution of Constitution, and to terminate the Constitution Pipeline project.pipeline.
Duke Energy, through its Gas UtilitiesGU&I segment, has a 47% equity ownership interest in ACP, which planned to build the ACP pipeline, an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline. The ACP pipeline was intended to transport diverse natural gas supplies into southeastern markets and Infrastructurewould be regulated by FERC. Dominion Energy owns 53% of ACP and was contracted to construct and operate the ACP pipeline upon completion. On July 5, 2020, Dominion announced a sale of substantially all of its natural gas transmission and storage segment assets, which were critical to the ACP pipeline. Further, permitting delays and legal challenges had materially affected the timing and cost of the pipeline. As a result, Duke Energy determined that they would no longer invest in the construction of the ACP pipeline.
Duke Energy, also through its GU&I segment, has investments in various renewable natural gas joint ventures.
GU&I has a 21.49% equity ownership interest in Cardinal, an intrastate pipeline located in North Carolina regulated by the NCUC, a 45% equity ownership in Pine Needle, an interstate liquefied natural gas storage facility located in North Carolina and a 50% equity ownership interest in Hardy Storage, an underground interstate natural gas storage facility located in Hardy and Hampshire counties in West Virginia. Pine Needle and Hardy Storage are regulated by FERC.

18




BUSINESS


KO Transmission Company (KO Transmission), a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy Ohio, is an interstate pipeline company engaged in the business of transporting natural gas and is subject to the rules and regulations of FERC. KO Transmission's 90-mile pipeline supplies natural gas to Duke Energy Ohio and interconnects with the Columbia Gulf Transmission pipeline and Tennessee Gas Pipeline. An approximately 70-mile portion of KO Transmission's pipeline facilities is co-owned by Columbia Gas Transmission, Corporation.LLC. KO Transmission sold all of its pipeline facilities and related real property to Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC on February 1, 2023, for approximately book value.
See Notes 4, 13 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," "Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates" and "Variable Interest Entities," respectively, for further information on Duke Energy's pipelineand GU&I's natural gas investments.
Inventory
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I must maintain adequate natural gas inventory in order to provide reliable delivery to customers. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the inventory balance for Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I was $111$185 million. For more information on inventory, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
17

BUSINESS
Regulation
State
The state gas utility commissions approve rates for Duke Energy's retail natural gas service within their respective states. The state gas utility commissions, to varying degrees, have authority over the construction and operation of Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’sGU&I’s natural gas distribution facilities. CPCNs issued by the state gas utility commissions or other government agencies, as applicable, authorize Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I to construct and operate its natural gas distribution facilities and to sell natural gas to retail and wholesale customers. Prior approval from the relevant state gas utility commission is required for Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I to issue securities. The underlying concept of utility ratemaking is to set rates at a level that allows the utility to collect revenues equal to its cost of providing service plus a reasonable rate of return on its invested capital, including equity.
In addition to amounts collected from customers through approved base rates, each of the state gas utility commissions allow recovery of certain costs through various cost-recoverycost recovery clauses to the extent the respective commission determines in periodic hearings that such costs, including any past over- or under-recovered costs, are prudent.
Natural gas costs are eligible for recovery by Gas Utilities and Infrastructure.GU&I. Due to the associated regulatory treatment and the method allowed for recovery, changes in natural gas costs from year to year have no material impact on operating results of Gas Utilities and Infrastructure,GU&I, unless a commission finds a portion of such costs to have not been prudent.imprudent. However, delays between the expenditure for natural gas and recovery from customers can adversely impact the timing of cash flows of Gas Utilities and Infrastructure.GU&I.
The following table summarizes certain components underlying recently approved and effective base rates or rate stabilization filings in the last three years.
years and applications currently pending approval.
 
Annual
Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions)
 
Return
on
Equity
 
Equity
Component of
Capital Structure
 Effective Date
Approved Rate Cases:       
Piedmont 2017 South Carolina Rate Stabilization Adjustment Filing6
 10.2% 53.0% November 2017
Piedmont 2018 South Carolina Rate Stabilization Adjustment Filing(14) 10.2% 53.0% November 2018
Piedmont 2019 South Carolina Rate Stabilization Adjustment Filing6
 9.9% 55.4% November 2019
Duke Energy Kentucky 2018 Natural Gas Base Rate Case7
 9.7% 50.8% April 2019
Piedmont 2019 North Carolina Natural Gas Base Rate Case109
 9.7% 52.0% November 2019
Annual
Increase
(Decrease)
(in millions)
Return
on
Equity
Equity
Component of
Capital Structure
Effective Date
Approved Rate Cases:
Piedmont 2020 Tennessee Natural Gas Base Rate Case$16 9.8 %50.5 %January 2021
Piedmont 2021 North Carolina Natural Gas Base Rate Case67 9.6 %51.6 %November 2021
Piedmont 2021 South Carolina Rate Stabilization Adjustment Filing9.8 %52.2 %November 2021
Duke Energy Kentucky 2021 Natural Gas Base Rate Case(a)
9.38 %51.3 %January 2022
Piedmont 2022 South Carolina Natural Gas Base Rate Case(b)
9.3 %52.2 %November 2022
Pending Rate Cases:
Duke Energy Ohio 2022 Natural Gas Base Rate Case49 10.3 %52.3 %April 2023
Gas Utilities(a)    An ROE of 9.375% for natural gas base rates and Infrastructure9.3% for natural gas riders was approved.
(b)    Under the rate stabilization adjustment (RSA) mechanism, Piedmont resets rates in South Carolina based on updated costs and revenues on an annual basis. The SC RSA filing for 2022 did not reset the rates since Piedmont filed a General Rate Case in 2022.
GU&I has an IMR mechanismsmechanism in North Carolina and Tennessee designed to separately track and recover certain costs associated with capital investments incurred to comply with federal pipeline safety and integrity programs, as well as additional state safety and integrity requirements in Tennessee.programs. Piedmont has withdrawn from the Tennessee IMR mechanism subsequent to the authorization of the Tennessee Annual Review Mechanism effective January 2022. The following table summarizes information related to the recently approved or pending IMR filings.
filing.
 Cumulative
 Annual
 Effective
(in millions)Investment
 Revenues
 Date
Piedmont 2019 IMR Filing – North Carolina$109
 $11.4
 December 2019
Pending Filing:    Expected Effective Date
Piedmont 2019 IMR Filing – Tennessee296.6
 28.1
 mid 2020
CumulativeAnnualEffective
(in millions)InvestmentRevenuesDate
Piedmont 2022 IMR Filing – North Carolina$213 $20 December 2022
In Ohio, GU&I has a Capital Expenditure Program Rider (CEP Rider) designed to recover costs between rate cases on PUCO approved capital expenditures. Duke Energy Ohio submits a filing each year for incremental investments to increase the revenue requirement up to the cap of approximately $7 million. The cumulative investment under the CEP Rider is $359 million with total annual revenue requirement of $70 million.
For more information on rate matters and other regulatory proceedings, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters.”

19




BUSINESS


Federal
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I is subject to various federal regulations, including regulations that are particular to the natural gas industry. These federal regulations include but are not limited to the following:
Regulations of the FERC affect the certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects, the purchase and sale of, the prices paid for, and the terms and conditions of service for the interstate transportation and storage of natural gas.
Regulations of the PHMSA affect the design, construction, operation, maintenance, integrity, safety and security of natural gas distribution and transmission systems.
Regulations of the EPA relate to the environment including proposed air emissions regulations that would expand to include emissions of methane.
18

BUSINESS
Regulations of the FERC and the state gas utility commissions govern access to regulated natural gas and other data by nonregulated entities and services provided between regulated and nonregulated energy affiliates. These regulations affect the activities of nonregulated affiliates with Gas Utilities and Infrastructure.
Environmental
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I is subject to the jurisdiction of the EPA and state and local environmental agencies. For a discussion of environmental regulation, see “Environmental Matters” in this section. See “Other Matters” section of Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis for a discussion about potential Global Climate Change legislation and other EPA regulations under development and the potential impacts such legislation and regulation could have on Duke Energy’s operations.
COMMERCIAL RENEWABLES
Commercial Renewables primarily acquires, develops, builds, operates and owns wind and solar renewable generation throughout the continental U.S. The portfolio includes nonregulated renewable energy and energy storage businesses. On April 24, 2019, Duke Energy executed an agreement to sell a minority interest in a portion of certain renewable assets. The sale closed on September 6, 2019, See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Acquisitions and Dispositions,” for additional information.
Commercial Renewables' renewable energy includes utility-scale wind and solar generation assets, distributed solar generation assets, distributed fuel cell assets and a battery storage project, which total 2,282 MW across 19 states from 22 wind facilities, 126 solar projects, 11 fuel cell locations and one battery storage facility. Revenues are primarily generated by selling the power produced from renewable generation through long-term contracts to utilities, electric cooperatives, municipalities and corporate customers. In most instances, these customers have obligations under state-mandated renewable energy portfolio standards or similar state or local renewable energy goals. Energy and renewable energy credits generated by wind and solar projects are generally sold at contractual prices. The following map shows the locations of renewable generation facilities of which Commercial Renewables has an ownership interest as of December 31, 2019.
servicemap2019cr001.jpg

20




BUSINESS


As eligible projects are placed in service, Commercial Renewables recognizes either PTCs as power is generated by wind projects over 10 years or ITCs when the renewable solar, fuel cells or wind project achieves commercial availability. ITCs are recognized over the useful life of the asset as a reduction to depreciation expense. Benefits of the tax basis adjustment due to the ITC are recognized in income in the year of commercial availability. The ITC is being phased down from the current 2019 rate of 30% to a permanent 10% rate if construction begins after 2021. The PTC is being phased out and wind turbines will earn 10 years of PTCs at phased-out rates if construction began in 2017 through 2020.
As part of its growth strategy, Commercial Renewables has expanded its investment portfolio through the addition of distributed solar companies and projects, energy storage systems and energy management solutions specifically tailored to commercial businesses. These investments include REC Solar, a California-based provider of solar installations for retail, manufacturing, agriculture, technology, government and nonprofit customers across the U.S. and Phoenix Energy Technologies Inc., a California-based provider of enterprise energy management and information software to commercial businesses.
Commercial Renewables has entered into agreements for certain of its generating assets that are held by LLCs whose members include a noncontrolling tax equity investor. The allocation of tax attributes and cash flows to the tax equity investor are governed by the provisions of the LLC agreements. The GAAP earnings allocations to the tax equity investors can result in variability in earnings to Duke Energy. As part of its growth strategy, Commercial Renewables expects to enter into these arrangements for future generating assets.
For additional information on Commercial Renewables' generation facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.”
Market Environment and Competition
Commercial Renewables primarily competes for wholesale contracts for the generation and sale of electricity from generation assets it either develops or acquires and owns. The market price of commodities and services, along with the quality and reliability of services provided, drive competition in the wholesale energy business. The number and type of competitors may vary based on location, generation type and project size. Commercial Renewables' main competitors include other nonregulated generators and wholesale power providers.
Sources of Electricity
Commercial Renewables relies on wind, solar, fuel cells and battery resources for its generation of electric energy.
Regulation
Commercial Renewables is subject to regulation at the federal level, primarily from the FERC. Regulations of the FERC govern access to regulated market information by nonregulated entities and services provided between regulated and nonregulated utilities.
OTHER
The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other. While it is not a business segment, Other primarily includes interest expense on holding company debt, unallocated corporate costs, including costs to achieve strategic acquisitions, amounts related to certain companywide initiatives and contributions made to the Duke Energy Foundation. Other also includes Bison and an investment in NMC.
The Duke Energy Foundation is a nonprofit organization funded by Duke Energy shareholders that makes charitable contributions to selected nonprofits and government subdivisions.
Bison, a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy, is a captive insurance company with the principal activity of providing Duke Energy subsidiaries with indemnification for financial losses primarily related to property, workers’ compensation and general liability.
Duke Energy owns a 17.5% equity interest in NMC. The joint venture company has production facilities in Jubail, Saudi Arabia, where it manufactures certain petrochemicals and plastics. The company annually produces approximately 1 million metric tons each of MTBE and methanol and has the capacity to produce 50,000 metric tons of polyacetal. The main feedstocks to produce these products are natural gas and butane. Duke Energy records the investment activity of NMC using the equity method of accounting and retains 25% of NMC's board of directors' representation and voting rights.
Human Capital Management
Governance
Our employees are critical to the success of our company. Our Human Resources organization is responsible for our human capital management strategy, which includes recruiting and hiring, onboarding and training, diversity and inclusion, workforce planning, talent and succession planning, performance management and employee development. Key areas of focus include fostering a high-performance and inclusive culture built on strong leadership and highly engaged and diverse employees, building a pipeline of skilled workers and ensuring knowledge transfer as employees retire.
Our Board of Directors provides oversight on certain human capital management matters, primarily through the Compensation and People Development Committee, which is responsible for reviewing strategies and policies related to human capital management, including with respect to matters such as diversity and inclusion, employee engagement and talent development.
Employees
On December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy had a total of 28,79327,859 full-time, part-time and temporary employees, on its payroll.the majority of which were full-time employees. The total includes 5,3995,081 employees who are represented by labor unions under various collective bargaining agreements that generally cover wages, benefits, working practices, and other terms and conditions of employment.

Compensation
The company seeks to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce and leverages Duke Energy’s leadership imperatives to foster a culture focused on customers, innovation, and highly engaged employees. Our compensation program is market driven and designed to link pay to performance with the goal of attracting and retaining talented employees, rewarding individual performance, and encouraging long-term commitment to our business. Our market competitive pay program includes short-term and long-term variable pay components that help to align the interests of Duke Energy to our customers and shareholders. In addition to competitive base pay, we provide eligible employees with compensation and benefits under a variety of plans and programs, including health care benefits, retirement savings, pension, health savings and flexible spending accounts, wellness, family leaves, employee assistance, as well as other benefits including a charitable matching program. The company is committed to providing market competitive, fair, and equitable compensation and regularly conducts internal pay equity reviews, and benchmarking against peer companies to ensure our pay is competitive.
Diversity and Inclusion
Duke Energy is committed to continuing to build a diverse workforce that reflects the communities we serve while strengthening a culture of inclusion where employees and customers feel respected and valued. Our Enterprise Diversity and Inclusion Council, chaired by our Chief Operating Officer in 2022, monitors the effectiveness and execution of our diversity and inclusion strategy and programs. Employee-led councils are also embedded across the company in our business units and focus on the specific diversity and inclusion needs of the business and help drive inclusion deeper into the employee experience. Leaders and individual contributors also have the opportunity to participate in voluntary diversity and inclusion training programs and facilitated conversations on insightful topics offered to further our commitment to building and enabling an inclusive work environment.
Our aspirational goals include achieving workforce representation of at least 25% female and 20% racial and ethnic diversity. We continue to strive toward reaching these aspirational goals and as of December 31, 2022, our workforce consisted of approximately 23.9% female and 20.4% racial and ethnic diversity.
21
19




BUSINESS

The company also has 10 Employee Resource Groups (ERGs), with 37 chapters and more than 6,500 employees participating. ERGs are networks of employees formed around a common dimension of diversity whose goals and objectives align with the company's goals and objectives. These groups focus on employee professional development and networking, community outreach, cultural awareness, recruiting and retention. They also serve as a resource to the company for advocacy and community outreach and improving customer service through innovation. ERG-sponsored forums include networking events, mentoring, scholarship banquets for aspiring college students, and workshops on topics such as time management, stress reduction, career planning and work-life balance. Our ERGs are open to all employees.
Among other efforts, the company has developed partnerships with community organizations, community colleges and historically Black colleges and universities to support our strategy of building a diverse and highly skilled talent pipeline.
Operational Excellence
The foundation for our growth and success is our continued focus on operational excellence, the leading indicator of which is safety. As such, the safety of our workforce remains our top priority. The company closely monitors the total incident case rate (TICR), which is a metric based on strict OSHA definitions that measures the number of occupational injuries and illnesses per 100 employees. This objective emphasizes our focus on achieving an event-free and injury-free workplace. As an indication of our commitment to safety, we include safety metrics in both the short-term and long-term incentive plans based on the TICR for employees. Our employees delivered strong safety results in 2022, consistent with our industry-leading performance levels from 2017 through 2021.
20


BUSINESS
Information about Our Executive Officers
The following table sets forth the individuals who currently serve as executive officers. Executive officers serve until their successors are duly elected or appointed.
Name
Age(a)
Current and Recent Positions Held
Lynn J. Good6063
Chairman,Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer. Ms. Good was electedhas served as Chairman of the Board, effective January 1, 2016, and assumed her position asChair, President and Chief Executive Officer inof Duke Energy since January 1, 2016, and was Vice Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Duke Energy from July 2013.2013 through December 2015. Prior to that, she served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since 2009.
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy6147
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. YoungSavoy assumed his currentthe position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in August 2013.September 2022. Prior to that, he served asheld the position of Executive Vice President, Chief AccountingStrategy and Commercial Officer from May 2021 through August 2022; Senior Vice President, Chief Transformation and Administrative Officer from October 2019 through April 2021; Senior Vice President, Business Transformation and Technology from May 2016 through September 2019; Senior Vice President, Controller assuming the role ofand Chief Accounting Officer in July 2012from September 2013 to May 2016; Director, Forecasting and Analysis from 2009 to September 2013; and Vice President and Controller of the role of Controller in December 2006.Commercial Power segment from 2006 to 2009.
Melissa H. AndersonKodwo Ghartey-Tagoe5559
Executive Vice President, and Chief Human Resources Officer. Ms. Anderson assumed her position in January 2015 and had responsibility for the Administration services organization from May 2016 until October 2019. Prior to joining Duke Energy, she served as Senior Vice President of Human Resources at Domtar Inc. since 2010.
Douglas F Esamann62
Executive Vice President, Energy Solutions and President, Midwest/Florida Regions and Natural Gas Business. Mr. Esamann assumed his current position in October 2019, was Executive Vice President, Energy Solutions and President, Midwest and Florida Regions since September 2016 and was Executive Vice President and President, Midwest and Florida Regions since June 2015. Prior to that, he served as President, Duke Energy Indiana since November 2010.
Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe56
Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary. Mr. Ghartey-Tagoe assumed the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in May 2020. He was appointed Executive Vice President and Chief Legal Officer in October 2019 after serving as President, South Carolina since 2017. Mr. Ghartey-Tagoe joined Duke Energy in 2002, and has held numerous management positions in Duke Energy’s Legal Department, including Duke Energy's Senior Vice President of State and Federal Regulatory Legal Support.
T. Preston Gillespie60

Executive Vice President, Chief Generation Officer and Enterprise Operational Excellence. Mr. Gillespie assumed the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Generation Officer and Enterprise Operational Excellence in January 2023. Prior to that, Mr. Gillespie served as the Chief Generation Officer since 2020.
Dwight L. JacobsR. Alexander Glenn5457
Senior Vice President and Chief AccountingExecutive Officer, TaxDuke Energy Florida and Controller.Midwest. Mr. Jacobs hasGlenn assumed his current position in May 2021. Prior to that, Mr. Glenn served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, TaxState and ControllerFederal Regulatory Legal Support since January 1, 2019. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller since June 1, 2018. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President, Financial Planning & Analysis since February 20162017 and as Chief Risk Officer since July 2014. PriorState President of Duke Energy Florida's operations from 2012 to his role as Chief Risk Officer, Mr. Jacobs served as Vice President, Rates & Regulatory Strategy since May 2010.2017.
Dhiaa M. Jamil6366
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Jamil assumed the role of Chief Operating Officer in May 2016. Prior to his current position, he held the title Executive Vice President and President, Regulated Generation and Transmission since June 2015. Prior to that, he served as Executive Vice President and President, Regulated Generation since August 2014. He served as Executive Vice President and President of Duke Energy Nuclear from March 2013 to August 2014, and was Chief Nuclear Officer from February 2008 to February 2013.
Julia S. Janson5458
Executive Vice President External Affairs and President, Carolinas Region.Chief Executive Officer, Duke Energy Carolinas. Ms. Janson hasassumed her current position in May 2021. Prior to that she held the position of Executive Vice President, External Affairs and President, Carolinas Region since October 2019.Prior to that, she held2019 and the position of Executive Vice President, External Affairs and Chief Legal Officer since November 2018. She originally assumed the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and Corporate Secretary in December 2012, and then assumed the responsibilities for External Affairs in February 2016.
Brian D. SavoyCynthia S. Lee4456
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller. Ms. Lee assumed her role as Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller in May 2021. Prior to that, she served as Director, Investor Relations since June 2019 and in various roles within the Corporate Controller's organization after joining the Corporation and its affiliates in 2002.
Ronald R. Reising62
Senior Vice President and Chief Transformation and AdministrativeHuman Resources Officer. Mr. SavoyReising assumed his current position in October 2019.July 2020. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President Business Transformation and Technologyof Operations Support since May 2016; Senior Vice President, Controller and2014. Prior to that, he served as Chief AccountingProcurement Officer from September 2013 to May 2016; Director, Forecasting and Analysis from 2009 to September 2013; and Vice President and Controller of the Commercial Power segment from 2006 to 2009.since 2006.
Henry K. SiderisLouis E. Renjel49
Senior Vice President, External Affairs and Communications. Mr. Renjel assumed his current position in May 2021. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President of Federal Government and Corporate Affairs since 2019, and as Vice President, Federal Government Affairs and Strategic Policy since he joined Duke Energy in March 2017 until 2019. Prior to joining Duke Energy, Mr. Renjel served as Vice President of Strategic Infrastructure since 2009 for CSX Corp and as their Director of Environmental and Government Affairs from 2006 to 2008.
Harry K. Sideris52
Executive Vice President, Customer Experience, Solutions and Services. Mr. Sideris assumed his current position in October 2019. Prior to that, he served as Senior Vice President and Chief Distribution Officer since June 2018; State President, Florida from January 2017 to June 2018; Senior Vice President of Environmental Health and Safety from August 2014 to January 2017; and Vice President of Power Generations for the Company'scompany's Fossil/Hydro Operations in the western portions of North Carolina and South Carolina from July 2012 to August 2014.
Steven K. Young64
Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy and Commercial Officer. Mr. Young assumed the position of Executive Vice President, Chief Strategy and Commercial Officer in September 2022. Prior to that, he held the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from August 2013 through August 2022; Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller, assuming the role of Chief Accounting Officer in July 2012 and the role of Controller in December 2006.
(a)    The ages of the officers provided are as of DecemberJanuary 31, 2019.2023.
There are no family relationships between any of the executive officers, nor any arrangement or understanding between any executive officer and any other person involved in officer selection.
21

BUSINESS
Environmental Matters
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and local laws and regulations with regard to air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters. Environmental laws and regulations affecting the Duke Energy Registrants include, but are not limited to:
The Clean Air Act, as well as state laws and regulations impacting air emissions, including State Implementation Plans related to existing and new national ambient air quality standards for ozone and particulate matter. Owners and/or operators of air emission sources are responsible for obtaining permits and for annual compliance and reporting.
The CWA,Clean Water Act, which requires permits for facilities that discharge wastewaters into navigable waters.

22




BUSINESS


The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, which can require any individual or entity that currently owns or in the past owned or operated a disposal site, as well as transporters or generators of hazardous substances sent to a disposal site, to share in remediation costs.
The National Environmental Policy Act, which requires federal agencies to consider potential environmental impacts in their permitting and licensing decisions, including siting approvals.
Coal Ash Act, as amended, which establishes requirements regarding the use and closure of existing ash basins, the disposal of ash at active coal plants and the handling of surface water and groundwater impacts from ash basins in North Carolina.
The Solid Waste Disposal Act, as amended by the RCRA, which creates a framework for the proper management of hazardous and nonhazardous solid waste; classifies CCR as nonhazardous waste; and establishes standards for landfill and surface impoundment placement, design, operation and closure, groundwater monitoring, corrective action, and post-closure care.
The Toxic Substances Control Act, , which gives EPA the authority to require reporting, recordkeeping and testing requirements, and to place restrictions relating to chemical substances and/or mixtures, including polychlorinated biphenyls.
The ACE rule, which will require states to develop CO2 reduction plans based on efficiency (heat rate) improvements at coal-fired power plants.
For more information on environmental matters, see Notes 5 and 910 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies – Environmental” and "Asset Retirement Obligations," respectively, and the “Other Matters” section of Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis. Except as otherwise described in these sections, costs to comply with current federal, state and local provisions regulating the discharge of materials into the environment or other potential costs related to protecting the environment are incorporated into the routine cost structure of our various business segments and are not expected to have a material adverse effect on the competitive position, consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position of the Duke Energy Registrants.
The "Other Matters" section of Item 7 Management's Discussion and Analysis includes an estimate of future capital expenditures required to comply withmore information on certain environmental regulations and a discussion of Global Climate Change including the potential impact of current and future legislation related to GHG emissions on the Duke Energy Registrants' operations. Recently passed and potential future environmental statutes and regulations could have a significant impact on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, cash flows or financial position. However, if and when such statutes and regulations become effective, the Duke Energy Registrants will seek appropriate regulatory recovery of costs to comply within its regulated operations.
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
Duke Energy Carolinas is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. Duke Energy Carolinas’ service area covers approximately 24,000 square miles and supplies electric service to 2.72.8 million residential, commercial and industrial customers. For information about Duke Energy Carolinas’ generating facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.” Duke Energy Carolinas is subject to the regulatory provisions of the NCUC, PSCSC, NRC and FERC.
Substantially all of Duke Energy Carolinas' operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Duke Energy Carolinas operates one reportable business segment, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.EU&I. For additional information regarding this business segment, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”
PROGRESS ENERGY
Progress Energy is a public utility holding company primarily engaged in the regulated electric utility business and is subject to regulation by the FERC. Progress Energy conducts operations through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida. When discussing Progress Energy’s financial information, it necessarily includes the results of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
Substantially all of Progress Energy’s operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Progress Energy operates one reportable business segment, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.EU&I. For additional information regarding this business segment, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
Duke Energy Progress is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. Duke Energy Progress’ service area covers approximately 29,000 square miles and supplies electric service to approximately 1.61.7 million residential, commercial and industrial customers. For information about Duke Energy Progress’ generating facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.” Duke Energy Progress is subject to the regulatory provisions of the NCUC, PSCSC, NRC and FERC.
Substantially all of Duke Energy Progress’ operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Duke Energy Progress operates one reportable business segment, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.EU&I. For additional information regarding this business segment, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”

22
23


PART I

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
Duke Energy Florida is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of Florida. Duke Energy Florida’s service area covers approximately 13,000 square miles and supplies electric service to approximately 1.81.9 million residential, commercial and industrial customers. For information about Duke Energy Florida’s generating facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.” Duke Energy Florida is subject to the regulatory provisions of the FPSC, NRC and FERC.
Substantially all of Duke Energy Florida’s operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Duke Energy Florida operates one reportable business segment, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.EU&I. For additional information regarding this business segment, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”
DUKE ENERGY OHIO
Duke Energy Ohio is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity in portions of Ohio and Kentucky, in the generation and sale of electricity in portions of Kentucky and the transportation and sale of natural gas in portions of Ohio and Kentucky. Duke Energy Ohio also conducts competitive auctions for retail electricity supply in Ohio whereby recovery of the energy price is from retail customers. Operations in Kentucky are conducted through its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky. References herein to Duke Energy Ohio include Duke Energy Ohio and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise noted. Duke Energy Ohio is subject to the regulatory provisions of the PUCO, KPSC, PHMSA and FERC.
Duke Energy Ohio’s service area covers approximately 3,000 square miles and supplies electric service to approximately 870,000900,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers and provides transmission and distribution services for natural gas to approximately 542,000550,000 customers. For information about Duke Energy Ohio's generating facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.”
KO Transmission, a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy Ohio, is an interstate pipeline company engaged in the business of transporting natural gas and is subject to the rules and regulations of FERC. KO Transmission's 90-mile pipeline supplies natural gas to Duke Energy Ohio and interconnects with the Columbia Gulf Transmission pipeline and Tennessee Gas Pipeline. An approximately 70-mile portion of KO Transmission's pipeline facilities is co-owned by Columbia Gas Transmission, Corporation.LLC. KO Transmission sold all of its pipeline facilities and related real property to Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC on February 1, 2023, for approximately book value.
Substantially all of Duke Energy Ohio's operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Duke Energy Ohio has two reportable segments, Electric UtilitiesEU&I and Infrastructure and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure.GU&I. For additional information on these business segments, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
Duke Energy Indiana is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of Indiana. Duke Energy Indiana’s service area covers 23,000 square miles and supplies electric service to 850,000890,000 residential, commercial and industrial customers. For information about Duke Energy Indiana's generating facilities, see Item 2, “Properties.” Duke Energy Indiana is subject to the regulatory provisions of the IURC and FERC.
In 2021, Duke Energy executed an agreement providing for an investment in Duke Energy Indiana by GIC. The transaction was completed following two closings. For additional information, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Dispositions."
Substantially all of Duke Energy Indiana’s operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Duke Energy Indiana operates one reportable business segment, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure.EU&I. For additional information regarding this business segment, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”
PIEDMONT
Piedmont is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the distribution of natural gas to over 11.1 million residential, commercial, industrial and power generation customers in portions of North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee, including customers served by municipalities who are wholesale customers. For information about Piedmont's natural gas distribution facilities, see Item 2, "Properties." Piedmont is subject to the regulatory provisions of the NCUC, PSCSC, TPUC, PHMSA and FERC.
Substantially all of Piedmont’s operations are regulated and qualify for regulatory accounting. Piedmont operates one reportable business segment, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure.GU&I. For additional information regarding this business segment, including financial information, see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments.”
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
In addition to other disclosures within this Form 10-K, including "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Matters Impacting Future Results" for each registrant in Item 7, and other documents filed with the SEC from time to time, the following factors should be considered in evaluating Duke Energy and its subsidiaries. Such factors could affect actual results of operations and cause results to differ substantially from those currently expected or sought. Unless otherwise indicated, risk factors discussed below generally relate to risks associated with all of the Duke Energy Registrants. Risks identified at the Subsidiary Registrant level are generally applicable to Duke Energy.

2423




RISK FACTORS


BUSINESS STRATEGY RISKS
Duke Energy’s future results could be adversely affected if it is unable to implement its business strategy.strategy including achieving its carbon emissions reduction goals.
Duke Energy’s results of operations depend, in significant part, on the extent to which it can implement its business strategy successfully. Duke Energy's strategy,clean energy transition, which includes achieving net-zero carbon emissions from electricity generation by 2050, modernizing the regulatory construct, transforming the customer experience, modernizing the energy grid, generating cleaner energy and working to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050, expanding the natural gas infrastructure, modernizing the regulatory construct and digital transformation, is subject to business, policy, regulatory, technology, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies, many of which are beyond its control. control and may make those goals difficult to achieve.
Federal or state policies could be enacted that restrict the availability of fuels or generation technologies, such as natural gas or nuclear power, that enable Duke Energy to reduce its carbon emissions. Supportive policies may be needed to facilitate the siting and cost recovery of transmission and distribution upgrades needed to accommodate the build out of large volumes of renewables and energy storage. Further, the approval of our state regulators will be necessary for the company to continue to retire existing carbon emitting assets or make investments in new generating capacity. The company may be constrained by the ability to procure resources or labor needed to build new generation at a reasonable price as well as to construct projects on time. In addition, new technologies that are not yet commercially available or are unproven at utility scale will likely be needed including new resources capable of following electric load over long durations such as advanced nuclear, hydrogen and long-duration storage, If these technologies are not developed or are not available at reasonable prices, or if we invest in early stage technologies that are then supplanted by technological breakthroughs, Duke Energy’s ability to achieve a net-zero target by 2050 at a cost-effective price could be at risk.
Achieving our carbon reduction goals will require continued operation of our existing carbon-free technologies including nuclear and renewables. The rapid transition to and expansion of certain low-carbon resources, such as renewables without cost-effective storage, may challenge our ability to meet customer expectations of reliability in a carbon constrained environment. Our nuclear fleet is central to our ability to meet these objectives and customer expectations. We are continuing to seek to renew the operating licenses of the 11 reactors we operate at six nuclear stations for an additional 20 years, extending their operating lives to and beyond midcentury. Failure to receive approval from the NRC for the relicensing of any of these reactors could affect our ability to achieve a net-zero target by 2050.
As a consequence, Duke Energy may not be able to fully implement or realize the anticipated results of its strategy.energy transition strategy, which may have an adverse effect on its financial condition.
REGULATORY, LEGISLATIVE AND LEGAL RISKS
The Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated utility revenues, earnings and results of operations are dependent on state legislation and regulation that affect electric generation, electric and natural gas transmission, distribution and related activities, which may limit their ability to recover costs.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated electric and natural gas utility businesses are regulated on a cost-of-service/rate-of-return basis subject to statutes and regulatory commission rules and procedures of North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Ohio, Tennessee, Indiana and Kentucky. If the Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated utility earnings exceed the returns established by the state utility commissions, retail electric and natural gas rates may be subject to review and possible reduction by the commissions, which may decrease the Duke Energy Registrants’ earnings. Additionally, if regulatory or legislative bodies do not allow recovery of costs incurred in providing service, or do not do so on a timely basis, the Duke Energy Registrants’ earnings could be negatively impacted. Differences in regulation between jurisdictions with concurrent operations, such as North Carolina and South Carolina in Duke Energy Carolinas' and Duke Energy Progress' service territory, may also result in failure to recover costs.
If legislative and regulatory structures were to evolve in such a way that the Duke Energy Registrants’ exclusive rights to serve their regulated customers were eroded, their earnings could be negatively impacted. Federal and state regulations, laws, commercialization and reduction of costs and other efforts designed to promote and expand the use of EE measures and distributed generation technologies, such as private solar and battery storage, in Duke Energy service territories could reduce recovery of fixed costs in Duke Energy service territories or result in customers leaving the electric distribution system and an increase in customer net energy metering, which allows customers with private solar to receive bill credits for surplus power at the full retail amount. Over time, customer adoption of these technologies and increased EE could result in excess generation resources as well as stranded costs if Duke Energy is not being able to fully recover the costs and investment in generation.
State regulators have approved various mechanisms to stabilize natural gas utility margins, including margin decoupling in North Carolina and rate stabilization in South Carolina. State regulators have approved other margin stabilizing mechanisms that, for example, allow for recovery of margin losses associated with negotiated transactions designed to retain large volume customers that could use alternative fuels or that may otherwise directly access natural gas supply through their own connection to an interstate pipeline. If regulators decided to discontinue the Duke Energy Registrants' use of tariff mechanisms, it would negatively impact results of operations, financial position and cash flows. In addition, regulatory authorities also review whether natural gas costs are prudently incurred and can disallow the recovery of a portion of natural gas costs that the Duke Energy Registrants seek to recover from customers, which would adversely impact earnings.
The rates that the Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated utility businesses are allowed to charge are established by state utility commissions in rate case proceedings, which may limit their ability to recover costs and earn an appropriate return on investment.
The rates that the Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated utility businessbusinesses are allowed to charge significantly influences the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants. The regulation of the rates that the regulated utility businesses charge customers is determined, in large part, by state utility commissions in rate case proceedings. Negative decisions made by these regulators, or by any court on appeal of a rate case proceeding, have, and in the future could have, a material adverse effect on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position or cash flows and affect the ability of the Duke Energy Registrants to recover costs and an appropriate return on the significant infrastructure investments being made.
24

RISK FACTORS
Deregulation or restructuring in the electric industry may result in increased competition and unrecovered costs that could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position or cash flows and their utility businesses.
Increased competition resulting from deregulation or restructuring legislation could have a significant adverse impact on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position or cash flows.flows and their utility businesses. If the retail jurisdictions served by the Duke Energy Registrants become subject to deregulation, the impairment of assets, loss of retail customers, lower profit margins or increased costs of capital, and recovery of stranded costs could have a significant adverse financial impact on the Duke Energy Registrants. Stranded costs primarily include the generation assets of the Duke Energy Registrants whose value in a competitive marketplace may be less than their current book value, as well as above-market purchased power commitments from QFs from whom the Duke Energy Registrants are legally obligated to purchase energy at an avoided cost rate under PURPA. The Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict the extent and timing of entry by additional competitors into the electric markets. The Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict if or when they will be subject to changes in legislation or regulation, nor can they predict the impact of these changes on their results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

25




RISK FACTORS


The Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses are subject to extensive federal regulation and a wide variety of laws and governmental policies, including taxes and environmental regulations, that may change over time in ways that affect operations and costs.
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to regulations under a wide variety of U.S. federal and state regulations and policies, including by FERC, NRC, EPA and various other federal agencies as well as the North American Electric Reliability Corporation. Regulation affects almost every aspect of the Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses, including, among other things, their ability to: take fundamental business management actions; determine the terms and rates of transmission and distribution services; make acquisitions; issue equity or debt securities; engage in transactions with other subsidiaries and affiliates; and pay dividends upstream to the Duke Energy Registrants. Changes to federal regulations are continuous and ongoing. There can be no assurance that laws, regulations and policies will not be changed in ways that result in material modifications of business models and objectives or affect returns on investment by restricting activities and products, subjecting them to escalating costs, causing delays, or prohibiting them outright.
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations requiring significant capital expenditures that can increase the cost of operations, and which may impact or limit business plans, or cause exposure to environmental liabilities.
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to numerous environmental laws and regulations affecting many aspects of their present and future operations, including CCRs, air emissions, water quality, wastewater discharges, solid waste and hazardous waste. These laws and regulations can result in increased capital, operating and other costs. These laws and regulations generally require the Duke Energy Registrants to obtain and comply with a wide variety of environmental licenses, permits, inspections and other approvals. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations can require significant expenditures, including expenditures for cleanup costs and damages arising from contaminated properties. Failure to comply with environmental regulations may result in the imposition of fines, penalties and injunctive measures affecting operating assets. The steps the Duke Energy Registrants could be required to take to ensure their facilities are in compliance could be prohibitively expensive. As a result, the Duke Energy Registrants may be required to shut down or alter the operation of their facilities, which may cause the Duke Energy Registrants to incur losses. Further, the Duke Energy Registrants may not be successful in recovering capital and operating costs incurred to comply with new environmental regulations through existing regulatory rate structures and their contracts with customers. Also, the Duke Energy Registrants may not be able to obtain or maintain from time to time all required environmental regulatory approvals for their operating assets or development projects. Delays in obtaining any required environmental regulatory approvals, failure to obtain and comply with them or changes in environmental laws or regulations to more stringent compliance levels could result in additional costs of operation for existing facilities or development of new facilities being prevented, delayed or subject to additional costs. Although it is not expected that the costs to comply with current environmental regulations will have a material adverse effect on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows due to regulatory cost recovery, the Duke Energy Registrants are at risk that the costs of complying with environmental regulations in the future will have such an effect.
The EPA has enacted or proposed federal regulations governing the management of cooling water intake structures, wastewater and CO2 emissions. New state legislation could impose carbon reduction goals that are more aggressive than the company's plans. These regulations may require the Duke Energy Registrants to make additional capital expenditures and increase operating and maintenance costs.
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress are subject to the terms of probation set out in judgments of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina on May 14, 2015. The judgments are based on events and activities that took place prior to 2015. The terms of probation require the companies to comply with certain environmental regulatory obligations related to coal ash and subject the two companies to oversight by a Court Appointed Monitor. If Duke Energy Carolinas or Duke Energy Progress failed to comply with certain coal ash-related environmental laws and regulations or otherwise violated the terms of probation, it could result in the imposition of additional penalties, including the revocation of probation and re-prosecution of the underlying violations. Although it is not expected that the companies will violate the terms of probation or that additional material penalties would occur, a significant violation of probation could have a material adverse effect on the Duke Energy Registrants’ reputation, results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The Duke Energy Registrants' operations, capital expenditures and financial results may be affected by regulatory changes related to the impacts of global climate change.
There is continued concern, and increasing activism, both nationally and internationally, about climate change. The EPA and state regulators have, and may adopt and implement, additional regulations to restrict emissions of GHGs to address global climate change. Certain local and state jurisdictions have also enacted laws to restrict or prevent new natural gas infrastructure. Increased regulation of GHG emissions could impose significant additional costs on the Duke Energy Registrants' electric and natural gas operations, their suppliers and customers.customers and affect demand for energy conservation and renewable products, which could impact both our electric and natural gas businesses. Regulatory changes could also result in generation facilities to be retired early andearlier than planned to meet our net-zero 2050 goal. Though we would plan to seek cost recovery for investments related to GHG emissions reductions through regulatory rate structures, changes in the regulatory climate could result in stranded costs if Duke Energy is not ablethe delay in or failure to fully recover thesuch costs and investment in generation.
OPERATIONAL RISKS
The Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations may be negatively affected by overall market, economic and other conditions that are beyond their control.
Sustained downturns or sluggishness in the economy generally affect the markets in which the Duke Energy Registrants operate and negatively influence operations. Declines in demand for electricity or natural gas as a result of economic downturns in the Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated service territories will reduce overall sales and lessen cash flows, especially as industrial customers reduce production and, therefore, consumption of electricity and the use of natural gas. Although the Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated electric and natural gas businesses are subject to regulated allowable rates of return and recovery of certain costs, such as fuel and purchased natural gas costs, under periodic adjustment clauses, overall declines in electricity or natural gas sold as a result of economic downturn or recession could reduce revenues and cash flows, thereby diminishing results of operations.
25

RISK FACTORS
A continuation of adverse economic conditions including economic downturn or high commodity prices could also negatively impact the financial stability of certain of our customers and result in their inability to pay for electric and natural gas services. This could lead to increased bad debt expense and higher allowance for doubtful account reserves for the Duke Energy Registrants and result in delayed or unrecovered operating costs and lower financial results. Additionally, prolonged economic downturns that negatively impact the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations and cash flows could result in future material impairment charges to write-down the carrying value of certain assets, including goodwill, to their respective fair values.

26




RISK FACTORS


The Duke Energy Registrants also monitor the impacts of inflation on the procurement of goods and services and seek to minimize its effects in future periods through pricing strategies, productivity improvements, and cost reductions. Rapidly rising prices as a result of inflation or other factors may impact the ability of the company to recover costs timely or execute on its business strategy including the achievement of growth objectives.
The Duke Energy Registrants also sell electricity into the spot market or other competitive power markets on a contractual basis. With respect to such transactions, the Duke Energy Registrants are not guaranteed any rate of return on their capital investments through mandated rates, and revenues and results of operations are likely to depend, in large part, upon prevailing market prices. These market prices may fluctuate substantially over relatively short periods of time and could negatively impact the company's ability to accurately forecast the financial impact or reduce the Duke Energy Registrants’ revenues and margins, thereby diminishing results of operations.
Factors that could impact sales volumes, generation of electricity and market prices at which the Duke Energy Registrants are able to sell electricity and natural gas are as follows:
weather conditions, including abnormally mild winter or summer weather that cause lower energy or natural gas usage for heating or cooling purposes, as applicable, and periods of low rainfall that decrease the ability to operate facilities in an economical manner;
supply of and demand for energy commodities;
transmission or transportation constraints or inefficiencies that impact nonregulated energy operations;
availability of purchased power;
availability of competitively priced alternative energy sources, which are preferred by some customers over electricity produced from coal, nuclear or natural gas plants, and customer usage of energy-efficient equipment that reduces energy demand;
natural gas, crude oil and refined products production levels and prices;
ability to procure satisfactory levels of inventory, including materials, supplies, and fuel such as coal, natural gas and uranium; and
capacity and transmission service into, or out of, the Duke Energy Registrants’ markets.
Natural disasters or operational accidents may adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ operating results.
Natural disasters or other operational accidents within the company or industry (such as forest fires, earthquakes, hurricanes or natural gas transmission pipeline explosions) could have direct or indirect impacts to the Duke Energy Registrants or to key contractors and suppliers. Further, the generation of electricity and the transportation and storage of natural gas involve inherent operating risks that may result in accidents involving serious injury or loss of life, environmental damage or property damage. Such events could impact the Duke Energy Registrants through changes to policies, laws and regulations whose compliance costs have a significant impact on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows. In addition, if a serious operational accident were to occur, existing insurance policies may not cover all of the potential exposures or the actual amount of loss incurred.incurred, including potential litigation awards. Any losses not covered by insurance, or any increases in the cost of applicable insurance as a result of such accident, could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position, cash flows and reputation of the Duke Energy Registrants.
The reputation and financial condition of the Duke Energy Registrants could be negatively impacted due to their obligations to comply with federal and state regulations, laws, and other legal requirements that govern the operations, assessments, storage, closure, remediation, disposal and monitoring relating to CCR, the high costs and new rate impacts associated with implementing these new CCR-related requirements and the strategies and methods necessary to implement these requirements in compliance with these legal obligations.
As a result of electricity produced for decades at coal-fired power plants, the Duke Energy Registrants manage large amounts of CCR that are primarily stored in dry storage within landfills or combined with water in other surface impoundments, all in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements. A CCR-related operational incident could have a material adverse impact on the reputation and results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants.
During 2015, EPA regulations were enacted related to the management of CCR from power plants. These regulations classify CCR as nonhazardous waste under the RCRA and apply to electric generating sites with new and existing landfills and, new and existing surface impoundments, and establish requirements regarding landfill design, structural integrity design and assessment criteria for surface impoundments, groundwater monitoring, protection and remedial procedures and other operational and reporting procedures for the disposal and management of CCR. In addition to the federal regulations, CCR landfills and surface impoundments will continue to be regulated by existing state laws, regulations and permits, as well as additional legal requirements that may be imposed in the future, such as the settlement reached with the NCDEQ to excavate seven of the nine remaining coal ash basins in North Carolina, and partially excavate the remaining two.two, and the EPA's January 11, 2022, issuance of a letter interpreting the CCR Rule, including its applicability and closure provisions. These federal and state laws, regulations and other legal requirements may require or result in additional expenditures, including increased operating and maintenance costs, which could affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants. The Duke Energy Registrants will continue to seek full cost recovery for expenditures through the normal ratemaking process with state and federal utility commissions, who permit recovery in rates of necessary and prudently incurred costs associated with the Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated operations, and through other wholesale contracts with terms that contemplate recovery of such costs, although there is no guarantee of full cost recovery. In addition, the timing for and amount of recovery of such costs could have a material adverse impact on Duke Energy's cash flows.
26

RISK FACTORS
The Duke Energy Registrants have recognized significant AROs related to these CCR-related requirements. Closure activities began in 2015 at the four sites specified as high-priorityhigh priority by the Coal Ash Act and at the W.S. Lee Steam Station site in South Carolina in connection with other legal requirements. Excavation at these sites involves movement of CCR materials to off-site locations for use as structural fill, to appropriateappropriately engineered off-site or on-site lined landfills or conversion of the ash for beneficial use. Duke Energy has completed excavation of coal ash regulated by the Coal Ash Act at three of the four high priorityhigh-priority North Carolina sites. At other sites, planning and closure methods have been studied and factored into the estimated retirement and management costs, and closure activities have commenced. As the closure and CCR management work progresses and final closure plans and corrective action measures are developed and approved at each site, the scope and complexity of work and the amount of CCR material could be greater than estimates and could, therefore, materially increase compliance expenditures and rate impacts.

27




RISK FACTORS


The Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows may be negatively affected by a lack of growth or slower growth in the number of customers, or decline in customer demand or number of customers.
Growth in customer accounts and growth of customer usage each directly influence demand for electricity and natural gas and the need for additional power generation and delivery facilities. Customer growth and customer usage are affected by several factors outside the control of the Duke Energy Registrants, such as mandated EE measures, demand-side management goals, distributed generation resources and economic and demographic conditions, such as inflation and interest rate volatility, population changes, job and income growth, housing starts, new business formation and the overall level of economic activity.
CertainIn addition, certain regulatory and legislative bodies have passed legislation implementing the extension of certain tax credits to be used toward the costs of residential solar installation or have introduced or are considering requirements and/or incentives to reduce energy consumption by certain dates.dates in response to concerns related to climate change. Additionally, technological advances driven by federal laws mandating new levels of EE in end-use electric and natural gas devices or other improvements in or applications of technology could lead to declines in per capita energy consumption.
Advances in distributed generation technologies that produce power, including fuel cells, microturbines, wind turbines and solar cells, may reduce the cost of alternative methods of producing power to a level competitive with central power station electric production utilized by the Duke Energy Registrants. In addition, the electrification of buildings and appliances currently relying on natural gas could reduce the number of customers in our natural gas distribution business.
Some or all of these factors could result in a lack of growth or decline in customer demand for electricity or number of customers and may cause the failure of the Duke Energy Registrants to fully realize anticipated benefits from significant capital investments and expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Furthermore, the Duke Energy Registrants currently have EE riders in place to recover the cost of EE programs in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky. Should the Duke Energy Registrants be required to invest in conservation measures that result in reduced sales from effective conservation, regulatory lag in adjusting rates for the impact of these measures could have a negative financial impact.
The Duke Energy Registrants future results of operations may be impacted by changing expectations and demands including heightened emphasis on environmental, social and governance concerns.
Duke Energy’s ability to execute its strategy and achieve anticipated financial outcomes are influenced by the expectations of our customers, regulators, investors, and stakeholders. Those expectations are based in part on the core fundamentals of reliability and affordability but are also increasingly focused on our ability to meet rapidly changing demands for new and varied products, services and offerings. Additionally, the risks of global climate change continues to shape our customers’ sustainability goals and energy needs as well as the investment and financing criteria of investors. Failure to meet these increasing expectations or to adequately address the risks and external pressures from regulators, customers, investors and other stakeholders may impact Duke Energy’s reputation and affect its ability to achieve favorable outcomes in future rate cases and the results of operations for the Duke Energy Registrants. Furthermore, the increasing use of social media may accelerate and increase the potential scope of negative publicity we might receive and could increase the negative impact on our reputation, business, results of operations, and financial condition.
As it relates to electric generation, a diversified fleet with increasingly clean generation resources may facilitate more efficient financing and lower costs. Conversely, jurisdictions utilizing more carbon-intensive generation such as coal may experience difficulty attracting certain investors and obtaining the most economical financing terms available. Furthermore, with this heightened emphasis on environmental, social, and governance concerns, and climate change in particular, there is an increased risk of litigation, activism, and legislation from groups both in support of and opposed to various environmental, social and governance initiatives, which could cause delays and increase the costs of our clean energy transition.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ operating results may fluctuate on a seasonal and quarterly basis and can be negatively affected by changes in weather conditions and severe weather, including extreme weather conditions associated withand changes in weather patterns from climate change.
Electric power generation and natural gas distribution are generally seasonal businesses. In most parts of the U.S., the demand for power peaks during the warmer summer months, with market prices also typically peaking at that time. In other areas, demand for power peaks during the winter. Demand for natural gas peaks during the winter months. Further, changing frequency or magnitude of extreme weather conditions such as hurricanes, droughts, heat waves, winter storms and severe weather, associated withincluding from climate change, could cause these seasonal fluctuations to be more pronounced. As a result, the overall operating results of the Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses may fluctuate substantially on a seasonal and quarterly basis and thus make period-to-period comparison less relevant.
Sustained severe drought conditions could impact generation by hydroelectric plants, as well as fossil and nuclear plant operations, as these facilities use water for cooling purposes and for the operation of environmental compliance equipment. Furthermore, destruction caused by severe weather events, such as hurricanes, flooding, tornadoes, severe thunderstorms, snow and ice storms, including from climate change, can result in lost operating revenues due to outages, property damage, including downed transmission and distribution lines, and additional and unexpected expenses to mitigate storm damage. The cost of storm restoration efforts may not be fully recoverable through the regulatory process.
27

RISK FACTORS
The Duke Energy Registrants’ sales may decrease if they are unable to gain adequate, reliable and affordable access to transmission assets.
The Duke Energy Registrants depend on transmission and distribution facilities owned and operated by utilities and other energy companies to deliver electricity sold to the wholesale market. In addition, the growth of renewables and energy storage will put strains on existing transmission assets and require transmission and distribution upgrades. The FERC’s power transmission regulations require wholesale electric transmission services to be offered on an open-access, non-discriminatory basis. If transmission is disrupted, or if transmission capacity is inadequate, the Duke Energy Registrants’ ability to sell and deliver products may be hindered.
The different regional power markets have changing regulatory structures, which could affect growth and performance in these regions. In addition, the ISOs who oversee the transmission systems in regional power markets have imposed in the past, and may impose in the future, price limitations and other mechanisms to address volatility in the power markets. These types of price limitations and other mechanisms may adversely impact the profitability of the Duke Energy Registrants’ wholesale power marketing business.
Duke Energy may be unable to complete necessary or desirable pipeline expansion or infrastructure development or maintenance projects, which may prevent the Duke Energy Registrants from expanding the natural gas business.
In order to serve current or new natural gas customers or expand the service to existing customers, the Duke Energy Registrants need to maintain, expand or upgrade distribution, transmission and/or storage infrastructure, including laying new pipeline and building compressor stations. Duke Energy Registrants have made significant investments in pipeline development projects, which are being operated and constructed by third-party joint venture partners. The Duke Energy Registrants must rely on their third-party joint venture partners for proper construction management of the projects and are dependent upon contractors for the successful and timely completion of the projects. In addition, various factors, such as the inability to obtain required approval from local, state and/or federal regulatory and governmental bodies, public opposition to projects, adverse litigation rulings, inability to obtain adequate financing, competition for labor and materials, construction delays, cost overruns and the inability to negotiate acceptable agreements relating to rights of way, construction or other material development components, may prevent or delay the completion of projects or materially increase the cost of such projects, which could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial position of Duke Energy.

28




RISK FACTORS


The availability of adequate interstate pipeline transportation capacity and natural gas supply may decrease.
The Duke Energy Registrants purchase almost all of their natural gas supply from interstate sources that must be transported to the applicable service territories. Interstate pipeline companies transport the natural gas to the Duke Energy Registrants' systems under firm service agreements that are designed to meet the requirements of their core markets. A significant disruption to interstate pipelines capacity or reduction in natural gas supply due to events including, but not limited to, operational failures or disruptions, hurricanes, tornadoes, floods, freeze off of natural gas wells, terrorist or cyberattacks or other acts of war or legislative or regulatory actions or requirements, including remediation related to integrity inspections or regulations and laws enacted to address climate change, could reduce the normal interstate supply of natural gas and thereby reduce earnings. Moreover, if additional natural gas infrastructure, including, but not limited to, exploration and drilling rigs and platforms, processing and gathering systems, off-shoreoffshore pipelines, interstate pipelines and storage, cannot be built at a pace that meets demand, then growth opportunities could be limited.
Fluctuations in commodity prices or availability may adversely affect various aspects of the Duke Energy Registrants’ operations as well as their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to the effects of market fluctuations in the price of natural gas, coal, fuel oil, nuclear fuel, electricity and other energy-related commodities as a result of their ownership of energy-related assets. Fuel costs are recovered primarily through cost-recoverycost recovery clauses, subject to the approval of state utility commissions.
Additionally, the Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to risk that counterparties will not be able to fulfill their obligations. Disruption in the delivery of fuel, including disruptions as a result of, among other things, bankruptcies, transportation delays, weather, labor relations, force majeure events or environmental regulations affecting any of these fuel suppliers, could limit the Duke Energy Registrants' ability to operate their facilities. Should counterparties fail to perform, the Duke Energy Registrants might be forced to replace the underlying commitment at prevailing market prices possibly resulting in losses in addition to the amounts, if any, already paid to the counterparties.
Certain of the Duke Energy Registrants’ hedge agreements may result in the receipt of, or posting of, collateral with counterparties, depending on the daily market-based calculation of financial exposure of the derivative positions. Fluctuations in commodity prices that lead to the return of collateral received and/or the posting of collateral with counterparties could negatively impact liquidity. Downgrades in the Duke Energy Registrants’ credit ratings could lead to additional collateral posting requirements. The Duke Energy Registrants continually monitor derivative positions in relation to market price activity.
Potential terrorist activities, or military or other actions, could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses.
The continued threat of terrorism and the impact of retaliatory military and other action by the U.S. and its allies may lead to increased political, economic and financial market instability and volatility in prices for natural gas and oil, which may have material adverse effects in ways the Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict at this time. In addition, future acts of terrorism and possible reprisals as a consequence of action by the U.S. and its allies could be directed against companies operating in the U.S. Information technology systems, transmission and distribution and generation facilities such as nuclear plants could be potential targets of terrorist activities or harmful activities by individuals or groups that could have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy Registrants' businesses. In particular, the Duke Energy Registrants may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for their information technology systems, transmission and distribution and generation facilities, including nuclear power plants under the NRC’s design basis threat requirements. These increased costs could include additional physical plant security and security personnel or additional capability following a terrorist incident.
The failure of Duke Energy information technology systems, or the failure to enhance existing information technology systems and implement new technology, could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses.
Duke Energy’s operations are dependent upon the proper functioning of its internal systems, including the information technology systems that support our underlying business processes. Any significant failure or malfunction of such information technology systems may result in disruptions of our operations. In the ordinary course of business, we rely on information technology systems, including the internet and third-party hosted services, to support a variety of business processes and activities and to store sensitive data, including (i) intellectual property, (ii) proprietary business information, (iii) personally identifiable information of our customers, employees, retirees and shareholders and (iv) data with respect to invoicing and the collection of payments, accounting, procurement, and supply chain activities. Our information technology systems are dependent upon global communications and cloud service providers, as well as their respective vendors, many of whom have at some point experienced significant system failures and outages in the past and may experience such failures and outages in the future. These providers’ systems are susceptible to cybersecurity and data breaches, outages from fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins and similar events. Failure to prevent or mitigate data loss from system failures or outages could materially affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants.
In addition to maintaining our current information technology systems, Duke Energy believes the digital transformation of its business is key to driving internal efficiencies as well as providing additional capabilities to customers. Duke Energy’s information technology systems are critical to cost-effective, reliable daily operations and our ability to effectively serve our customers. We expect our customers to continue to demand more sophisticated technology-driven solutions and we must enhance or replace our information technology systems in response. This involves significant development and implementation costs to keep pace with changing technologies and customer demand. If we fail to successfully implement critical technology, or if it does not provide the anticipated benefits or meet customer demands, such failure could materially adversely affect our business strategy as well as impact the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants.

29




RISK FACTORS


Cyberattacks and data security breaches could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants' businesses.
Cybersecurity risks have increased in recent years as a result of the proliferation of new technologies and the increased sophistication, magnitude and frequency of cyberattacks and data security breaches. Duke Energy relies on the continued operation of sophisticated digital information technology systems and network infrastructure, which are part of an interconnected regional grid. Additionally, connectivity to the internet continues to increase through grid modernization and other operational excellence initiatives. Because of the critical nature of the infrastructure, increased connectivity to the internet and technology systems’ inherent vulnerability to disability or failures due to hacking, viruses, acts of war or terrorism or other types of data security breaches, the Duke Energy Registrants face a heightened risk of cyberattack from foreign or domestic sources and have been subject, and will likely continue to be subject, to attempts to gain unauthorized access to information and/or information systems or to disrupt utility operations through computer viruses and phishing attempts either directly or indirectly through its material vendors or related third parties. In the event of a significant cybersecurity breach on either the Duke Energy Registrants or with one of our material vendors or related third parties, the Duke Energy Registrants could (i) have business operations disrupted, including the disruption of the operation of our natural gas and electric assets and the power grid, theft of confidential company, employee, retiree, shareholder, vendor or customer information, and general business systems and process interruption or compromise, including preventing the Duke Energy Registrants from servicing customers, collecting revenues or the recording, processing and/or reporting financial information correctly, (ii) experience substantial loss of revenues, repair and restoration costs, penalties and costs for lack of compliance with relevant regulations, implementation costs for additional security measures to avert future cyberattacks and other financial loss and (iii) be subject to increased regulation, litigation and reputational damage. While Duke Energy maintains insurance relating to cybersecurity events, such insurance is subject to a number of exclusions and may be insufficient to offset any losses, costs or damage experienced. Also, the market for cybersecurity insurance is relatively new and coverage available for cybersecurity events is evolving as the industry matures.
28

RISK FACTORS
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to standards enacted by the North American Electric Reliability Corporation and enforced by FERC regarding protection of the physical and cyber securitycybersecurity of critical infrastructure assets required for operating North America's bulk electric system. The Duke Energy Registrants are also subject to regulations set by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission regarding the protection of digital computer and communication systems and networks required for the operation of nuclear power plants. The Duke Energy Registrants that operate designated critical pipelines that transport natural gas are also subject to security directives issued by the Department of Homeland Security's Transportation Security Administration (TSA) requiring such registrants to implement specific cybersecurity mitigation measures. While the Duke Energy Registrants believe they are in compliance with, or, in the case of recent TSA security directives, are in the process of implementing such standards and regulations, the Duke Energy Registrants have from time to time been, and may in the future be, found to be in violation of such standards and regulations. In addition, compliance with or changes in the applicable standards and regulations may subject the Duke Energy Registrants to higher operating costs and/or increased capital expenditures as well as substantial fines for non-compliance.
FailureThe Duke Energy Registrants’ operations have been and may be affected by pandemic health events, including COVID-19, in ways listed below and in ways the Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict at this time.
The COVID-19 pandemic and efforts to attractrespond to it have resulted in widespread adverse consequences on the global economy and retain an appropriately qualified workforceon the Duke Energy Registrants’ customers, third-party vendors, and other parties with whom we do business. If the COVID-19 pandemic or other health epidemics and outbreaks that may occur are significantly prolonged, it could unfavorably impact the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations.
Certain events, such as an aging workforce, mismatch of skill set or complement to future needs, or unavailability of contract resources may lead to operating challenges and increased costs. The challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge base and the lengthy time required for skill development. In this case, costs, including costs for contractors to replace employees, productivity costs and safety costs, may increase. Failure to hire and adequately train replacement employees, including the transfer of significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to new employees, or future availability and cost of contract labor may adversely affect the ability to manage and operate theRegistrants' business especially considering the workforce needs associated with nuclear generation facilities and new skills required to operate a modernized, technology-enabled power grid. If the Duke Energy Registrants are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, theirstrategy, results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be negatively affected.in the future as a result of delays in rate cases or other legal proceedings, an inability to obtain labor or equipment necessary for the construction of large capital projects, an inability to procure satisfactory levels of fuels or other necessary equipment for the continued production of electricity and delivery of natural gas, and the health and availability of our critical personnel and their ability to perform business functions.
Duke Energy Ohio’s and Duke Energy Indiana’s membership in an RTO presents risks that could have a material adverse effect on their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The rules governing the various regional power markets may change, which could affect Duke Energy Ohio’s and Duke Energy Indiana’s costs and/or revenues. To the degree Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana incur significant additional fees and increased costs to participate in an RTO, their results of operations may be impacted. Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana may be allocated a portion of the cost of transmission facilities built by others due to changes in RTO transmission rate design. Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana may be required to expand their transmission system according to decisions made by an RTO rather than their own internal planning process. In addition, RTOs have been developing rules associated with the allocation and methodology of assigning costs associated with improved transmission reliability, reduced transmission congestion and firm transmission rights that may have a financial impact on the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana.
As members of an RTO, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana are subject to certain additional risks, including those associated with the allocation among RTO members, of losses caused by unreimbursed defaults of other participants in the RTO markets and those associated with complaint cases filed against an RTO that may seek refunds of revenues previously earned by RTO members.
The Duke Energy Registrants may not recover costs incurred to begin construction on projects that are canceled.
Duke Energy’s long-term strategy requires the construction of new projects, either wholly owned or partially owned, which involve a number of risks, including construction delays, delays in or failure to receive required regulatory approvals and/or sitting or environmental permits, nonperformance by equipment and other third-party suppliers, and increases in equipment and labor costs. To limit the risks of these construction projects, the Duke Energy Registrants enter into equipment purchase orders and construction contracts and incur engineering and design service costs in advance of receiving necessary regulatory approvals and/or siting or environmental permits. If any of these projects are canceled for any reason, including failure to receive necessary regulatory approvals and/or siting or environmental permits, significant cancellation penalties under the equipment purchase orders and construction contracts could occur. In addition, if any construction work or investments have been recorded as an asset, an impairment may need to be recorded in the event the project is canceled.

30




RISK FACTORS


The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to risks associated with their ability to obtain adequate insurance at acceptable costs.
The financial condition of some insurance companies, actual or threatened physical or cyber attacks,cyberattacks, and natural disasters, among other things, could have disruptive effects on insurance markets. The availability of insurance covering risks that the Duke Energy Registrants and their respective competitors typically insure against may decrease, and the insurance that the Duke Energy Registrants are able to obtain may have higher deductibles, higher premiums, and more restrictive policy terms. Further, the insurance policies may not cover all of the potential exposures or the actual amount of loss incurred. Any losses not covered by insurance, or any increases in the cost of applicable insurance, could adversely affect the results of operations, financial position or cash flows of the affected Duke Energy Registrant.
Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders.
While we strive to maintain constructive communications with our shareholders, activist shareholders may, from time to time, engage in proxy solicitations or advance shareholder proposals, or otherwise attempt to affect changes and assert influence on our Board and management. Perceived uncertainties as to the future direction or governance of the company may cause concern to our current or potential regulators, vendors or strategic partners, or make it more difficult to execute on our strategy or to attract and retain qualified personnel, which may have a material impact on our business and operating results.
In addition, actions such as those described above could cause fluctuations in the trading price of our common stock, based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.
29

RISK FACTORS
NUCLEAR GENERATION RISKS
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida may incur substantial costs and liabilities due to their ownership and operation of nuclear generating facilities.
Ownership interests in and operation of nuclear stations by Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida subject them to various risks. These risks include, among other things: the potential harmful effects on the environment and human health resulting from the current or past operation of nuclear facilities and the storage, handling and disposal of radioactive materials; limitations on the amounts and types of insurance commercially available to cover losses that might arise in connection with nuclear operations; and uncertainties with respect to the technological and financial aspects of decommissioning nuclear plants at the end of their licensed lives.
Ownership and operation of nuclear generation facilities requires compliance with licensing and safety-related requirements imposed by the NRC. In the event of non-compliance, the NRC may increase regulatory oversight, impose fines or shut down a unit depending upon its assessment of the severity of the situation. Revised security and safety requirements promulgated by the NRC, which could be prompted by, among other things, events within or outside of the control of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, such as a serious nuclear incident at a facility owned by a third party, could necessitate substantial capital and other expenditures, as well as assessments to cover third-party losses. In addition, if a serious nuclear incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position, cash flows and reputation of the Duke Energy Registrants.
LIQUIDITY, CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS AND COMMON STOCK RISKS
The Duke Energy Registrants rely on access to short-term borrowings and longer-term debt and equity markets to finance their capital requirements and support their liquidity needs. Access to those markets can be adversely affected by a number of conditions, many of which are beyond the Duke Energy Registrants’ control.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses are significantly financed through issuances of debt and equity. The maturity and repayment profile of debt used to finance investments often does not correlate to cash flows from their assets. Accordingly, as a source of liquidity for capital requirements not satisfied by the cash flows from their operations and to fund investments originally financed through debt instruments with disparate maturities, the Duke Energy Registrants rely on access to short-term money markets as well as longer-term capital markets. The Subsidiary Registrants also rely on access to short-term intercompany borrowings. If the Duke Energy Registrants are not able to access debt or equity at competitive rates or at all, the ability to finance their operations and implement their strategy and business plan as scheduled could be adversely affected. An inability to access debt and equity may limit the Duke Energy Registrants’ ability to pursue improvements or acquisitions that they may otherwise rely on for future growth.
Market disruptions may increase the cost of borrowing or adversely affect the ability to access one or more financial markets. Such disruptions could include: economic downturns, the bankruptcy of an unrelated energy company, unfavorable capital market conditions, market prices for electricitynatural gas and natural gas,coal, geopolitical risks, actual or threatened terrorist attacks, or the overall health of the energy industry. Additionally, rapidly rising interest rates could impact the ability to affordably finance the capital plan or increase rates to customers and could have an impact on our ability to execute on our clean energy transition. The availability of credit under Duke Energy’s Master Credit Facility depends upon the ability of the banks providing commitments under the facility to provide funds when their obligations to do so arise. SystematicSystemic risk of the banking system and the financial markets could prevent a bank from meeting its obligations under the facility agreement.
Duke Energy maintains a revolving credit facility to provide backup for its commercial paper program and letters of credit to support variable rate demand tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrant issuer at the option of the holder. The facility includes borrowing sublimits for the Duke Energy Registrants, each of whom is a party to the credit facility, and financial covenants that limit the amount of debt that can be outstanding as a percentage of the total capital for the specific entity. Failure to maintain these covenants at a particular entity could preclude Duke Energy from issuing commercial paper or the Duke Energy Registrants from issuing letters of credit or borrowing under the Master Credit Facility.
The Duke Energy Registrants must meet credit quality standards and there is no assurance they will maintain investment grade credit ratings. If the Duke Energy Registrants are unable to maintain investment grade credit ratings, they would be required under credit agreements to provide collateral in the form of letters of credit or cash, which may materially adversely affect their liquidity.
Each of the Duke Energy Registrants’ senior long-term debt issuances is currently rated investment grade by various rating agencies. The Duke Energy Registrants cannot ensure their senior long-term debt will be rated investment grade in the future.
If the rating agencies were to rate the Duke Energy Registrants below investment grade, borrowing costs would increase, perhaps significantly. In addition, the potential pool of investors and funding sources would likely decrease. Further, if the short-term debt rating were to fall, access to the commercial paper market could be significantly limited.
A downgrade below investment grade could also require the posting of additional collateral in the form of letters of credit or cash under various credit, commodity and capacity agreements and trigger termination clauses in some interest rate derivative agreements, which would require cash payments. All of these events would likely reduce the Duke Energy Registrants’ liquidity and profitability and could have a material effect on their results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

31




RISK FACTORS


Non-compliance with debt covenants or conditions could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ ability to execute future borrowings.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ debt and credit agreements contain various financial and other covenants. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements.
30

RISK FACTORS
Market performance and other changes may decrease the value of the NDTF investments of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, which then could require significant additional funding.
Ownership and operation of nuclear generation facilities also requires the maintenance of funded trusts that are intended to pay for the decommissioning costs of the respective nuclear power plants. The performance of the capital markets affects the values of the assets held in trust to satisfy these future obligations. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have significant obligations in this area and hold significant assets in these trusts. These assets are subject to market fluctuations and will yield uncertain returns, which may fall below projected rates of return. Although a number of factors impact funding requirements, a decline in the market value of the assets may increase the funding requirements of the obligations for decommissioning nuclear plants. If Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are unable to successfully manage their NDTF assets, their results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be negatively affected.
Poor investment performance of the Duke Energy pension plan holdings and other factors impacting pension plan costs could unfavorably impact the Duke Energy Registrants’ liquidity and results of operations.
The costs of providing non-contributory defined benefit pension plans are dependent upon a number of factors, such as the rates of return on plan assets, discount rates, the level of interest rates used to measure the required minimum funding levels of the plans, future government regulation and required or voluntary contributions made to the plans. The Subsidiary Registrants are allocated their proportionate share of the cost and obligations related to these plans. Without sustained growth in the pension investments over time to increase the value of plan assets and, depending upon the other factors impacting costs as listed above, Duke Energy could be required to fund its plans with significant amounts of cash. Such cash funding obligations, and the Subsidiary Registrants’ proportionate share of such cash funding obligations, could have a material adverse impact on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Duke Energy is a holding company and depends on the cash flows from its subsidiaries to meet its financial obligations.
Because Duke Energy is a holding company with no operations or cash flows of its own, its ability to meet its financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and to pay dividends on its common stock, is primarily dependent on the net income and cash flows of its subsidiaries and the ability of those subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or to repay borrowed funds. Prior to funding Duke Energy, its subsidiaries have regulatory restrictions and financial obligations that must be satisfied. These subsidiaries are separate legal entities and have no obligation to provide Duke Energy with funds. In addition, Duke Energy may provide capital contributions or debt financing to its subsidiaries under certain circumstances, which would reduce the funds available to meet its financial obligations, including making interest and principal payments on outstanding indebtedness and to pay dividends on Duke Energy’s common stock.
GENERAL RISKS
The failure of Duke Energy information technology systems, or the failure to enhance existing information technology systems and implement new technology, could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses.
Duke Energy’s operations are dependent upon the proper functioning of its internal systems, including the information technology systems that support our underlying business processes. Any significant failure or malfunction of such information technology systems may result in disruptions of our operations. In the ordinary course of business, we rely on information technology systems, including the internet and third-party hosted services, to support a variety of business processes and activities and to store sensitive data, including (i) intellectual property, (ii) proprietary business information, (iii) personally identifiable information of our customers, employees, retirees and shareholders and (iv) data with respect to invoicing and the collection of payments, accounting, procurement, and supply chain activities. Our information technology systems are dependent upon global communications and cloud service providers, as well as their respective vendors, many of whom have at some point experienced significant system failures and outages in the past and may experience such failures and outages in the future. These providers’ systems are susceptible to cybersecurity and data breaches, outages from fire, floods, power loss, telecommunications failures, break-ins and similar events. Failure to prevent or mitigate data loss from system failures or outages could materially affect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants.
In addition to maintaining our current information technology systems, Duke Energy believes the digital transformation of its business is key to driving internal efficiencies as well as providing additional capabilities to customers. Duke Energy’s information technology systems are critical to cost-effective, reliable daily operations and our ability to effectively serve our customers. We expect our customers to continue to demand more sophisticated technology-driven solutions and we must enhance or replace our information technology systems in response. This involves significant development and implementation costs to keep pace with changing technologies and customer demand. If we fail to successfully implement critical technology, or if it does not provide the anticipated benefits or meet customer demands, such failure could materially adversely affect our business strategy as well as impact the results of operations, financial position and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants.
Potential terrorist activities, or military or other actions, could adversely affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ businesses.
The continued threat of terrorism and the impact of retaliatory military and other action by the U.S. and its allies may lead to increased political, economic and financial market instability and volatility in prices for natural gas and oil, which may have material adverse effects in ways the Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict at this time. In addition, future acts of terrorism and possible reprisals as a consequence of action by the U.S. and its allies could be directed against companies operating in the U.S. Information technology systems, transportation systems for our fuel sources including natural gas pipelines, transmission and distribution and generation facilities such as nuclear plants could be potential targets of terrorist activities or harmful activities by individuals or groups that could have a material adverse effect on Duke Energy Registrants' businesses. In particular, the Duke Energy Registrants may experience increased capital and operating costs to implement increased security for their information technology systems, transmission and distribution and generation facilities, including nuclear power plants under the NRC’s design basis threat requirements. These increased costs could include additional physical plant security and security personnel or additional capability following a terrorist incident.
31

RISK FACTORS
Failure to attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce could unfavorably impact the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations.
Certain events, such as an aging workforce, mismatch of skill set or complement to future needs, or unavailability of contract resources may lead to operating challenges and increased costs. The challenges include lack of resources, loss of knowledge base and the lengthy time required for skill development. In this case, costs, including costs for contractors to replace employees, productivity costs and safety costs, may increase. Failure to hire and adequately train replacement employees, including the transfer of significant internal historical knowledge and expertise to new employees, or future availability and cost of contract labor may adversely affect the ability to manage and operate the business, especially considering the workforce needs associated with nuclear generation facilities and new skills required to operate a modernized, technology-enabled power grid. If the Duke Energy Registrants are unable to successfully attract and retain an appropriately qualified workforce, their results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be negatively affected.
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None.

32



PROPERTIES


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
The following table provides information related to the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure'sEU&I's generation stations as of December 31, 2019.2022. The MW displayed in the table below are based on summer capacity. Ownership interest in all facilities is 100% unless otherwise indicated.
Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Carolinas
OconeeNuclearUraniumSC2,554 
McGuireNuclearUraniumNC2,316 
Catawba(a)
NuclearUraniumSC445 
Belews CreekFossilCoal/GasNC2,220 
MarshallFossilCoal/GasNC2,058 
J.E. Rogers FossilCoal/GasNC1,388 
Lincoln Combustion Turbine (CT)FossilGas/OilNC1,161 
AllenFossilCoalNC421 
Rockingham CTFossilGas/OilNC825 
W.S. Lee Combined Cycle (CC)(b)
FossilGasSC686 
Buck CCFossilGasNC668 
Dan River CCFossilGasNC662 
Mill Creek CTFossilGas/OilSC563 
Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Carolinas
OconeeNuclearUraniumSC2,554
McGuireNuclearUraniumNC2,316
Catawba(a)
NuclearUraniumSC445
Belews CreekFossilCoalNC2,220
MarshallFossilCoalNC2,058
J.E. Rogers FossilCoalNC1,388
Lincoln CTFossilGas/OilNC1,193
AllenFossilCoalNC1,098
Rockingham CTFossilGas/OilNC825
W.S. Lee CCCT(b)
FossilGasGas/OilNCSC686
84 
Buck CCClemson CHPFossilGasNCSC668
13 
Dan River CCBad CreekFossilHydroGasWaterNCSC662
1,520 
Mill Creek CTJocasseeFossilHydroGas/OilWaterSC563
780 
W.S. LeeCowans FordFossilHydroGasWaterSCNC170
324 
W.S. Lee CTKeoweeFossilHydroGas/OilWaterSC84
152 
Clemson CHP Fossil Gas SC13
Bad CreekHydroWaterSC1,360
JocasseeHydroWaterSC780
Cowans FordHydroWaterNC324
KeoweeHydroWaterSC152
Other small facilities (19 plants)HydroWaterNC/SC603
581 
Distributed generationRenewableSolarNC30
71 
Total Duke Energy Carolinas20,192
19,492
Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Progress
BrunswickNuclearUraniumNC1,870 
HarrisNuclearUraniumNC964 
RobinsonNuclearUraniumSC759 
RoxboroFossilCoalNC2,439 
Smith CCFossilGas/OilNC1,083 
H.F. Lee CCFossilGas/OilNC888 
Wayne County CTFossilGas/OilNC822 
Smith CTFossilGas/OilNC772 
MayoFossilCoalNC704 
L.V. Sutton CCFossilGas/OilNC607 
Owned MW
FacilityAsheville CCPlant TypeFossilPrimary FuelGas/OilLocationNCCapacity
476 
Duke Energy ProgressAsheville CTFossilGas/OilNC320 
BrunswickDarlington CTNuclearFossilUraniumGas/OilNCSC1,870
234 
HarrisWeatherspoon CTNuclearFossilUraniumGas/OilNC964
124 
RobinsonNuclearUraniumSC741
RoxboroFossilCoalNC2,439
Smith CCFossilGas/OilNC1,085
H.F. Lee CCFossilGas/OilNC888
Wayne County CTFossilGas/OilNC857
Smith CTFossilGas/OilNC772
MayoFossilCoalNC727
Darlington CTFossilGas/OilSC613
L.V. Sutton CCFossilGas/OilNC607
AshevilleFossilCoalNC344
Asheville CTFossilGas/OilNC320
Asheville CC Fossil Gas/Oil NC237
Weatherspoon CTFossilGas/OilNC124
L.V. Sutton CT (Black Start)FossilGas/OilNC78
84 
Blewett CTFossilOilNC52
52 
WaltersHydroWaterNC112
112 
Other small facilities (3 plants)(3)HydroWaterNC115
116 
Distributed generationRenewableSolarNC49
35 
Asheville – Rock Hill BatteryRenewableStorageNC
Hot Springs MicrogridRenewableStorageNC
Total Duke Energy Progress12,994
12,464

33


PROPERTIES


Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Florida
Hines CCFossilGas/OilFL2,061 
Citrus County CCFossilGasFL1,610 
Crystal RiverFossilCoalFL1,410 
Bartow CCFossilGas/OilFL1,112 
AncloteFossilGasFL1,013 
Intercession City CTFossilGas/OilFL940 
Osprey CCFossilGas/OilFL576 
DeBary CTFossilGas/OilFL524 
Tiger Bay CCFossilGas/OilFL199 
Bayboro CTFossilOilFL171 
Bartow CTFossilGas/OilFL168 
Suwannee River CTFossilGasFL145 
Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Florida
Hines CCFossilGas/OilFL2,054
Citrus County CCFossilGasFL1,610
Crystal RiverFossilCoalFL1,422
Bartow CCFossilGas/OilFL1,169
AncloteFossilGasFL1,013
Intercession City CTFossilGas/OilFL951
Osprey CCFossilGas/OilFL583
DeBary CTFossilGas/OilFL559
Tiger Bay CCFossilGas/OilFL200
Bayboro CTFossilOilFL171
Bartow CTFossilGas/OilFL168
Suwannee River CTFossilGasFL149
Avon Park CTFossilGas/OilFL48
University of Florida CoGen CTFossilGasFL43
Distributed generationRenewableSolarFL119
Total Duke Energy Florida10,259
Owned MW
FacilityUniversity of Florida CoGen CTPlant TypeFossilPrimary FuelGasLocationFLCapacity
44 
Duke Energy OhioDistributed generationRenewableSolarFL485 
East BendTrenton BatteryFossilRenewableCoalStorageKYFL600
11 
Woodsdale CTMicanopy Energy StorageFossilRenewableGas/PropaneStorageOHFL476
Total Duke Energy OhioJennings BatteryRenewableStorageFL1,076
5.5 
Cape San Blas BatteryRenewableStorageFL5.5 
Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Indiana
Gibson(c)
FossilCoalIN2,822
Cayuga(d)
FossilCoal/OilIN1,005
EdwardsportFossilCoalIN595
Madison CTFossilGasOH566
Wheatland CTFossilGasIN450
Vermillion CT(e)
FossilGasIN360
GallagherFossilCoalIN280
Noblesville CCFossilGas/OilIN264
Henry County CTFossilGas/OilIN129
Cayuga CTFossilGas/OilIN86
MarklandHydroWaterIN51
Distributed generationRenewableSolarIN11
Camp Atterbury Battery RenewableStorage IN4
Total Duke Energy IndianaFlorida6,623
10,488
Owned MW
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Duke Energy Ohio
East BendFossilCoalKY600 
Woodsdale CTFossilGas/PropaneOH476 
Beckjord Battery StorageRenewableStorageOH
Total Duke Energy Ohio1,080
Owned MW
Totals byFacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Total Electric UtilitiesDuke Energy Indiana51,144
Totals By Plant Type
Nuclear8,890
Fossil38,544
Hydro3,497
Renewable213
Total Electric Utilities51,144
(a)
Gibson(c)
Jointly owned with North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, NCEMC and PMPA. Duke Energy Carolinas' ownership is 19.25% of the facility.Fossil
CoalIN2,822 
(b)
Cayuga(d)
Jointly owned with NCEMC. Duke Energy Carolinas' ownership is 87.27% of the facility.Fossil
Coal/OilIN1,005 
(c)EdwardsportFossilCoalIN595 
Madison CTFossilGasOH566 
Wheatland CTFossilGasIN444 
Vermillion CT(e)
FossilGasIN360 
Noblesville CCFossilGas/OilIN264 
Henry County CTFossilGas/OilIN126 
Cayuga CTFossilGas/OilIN84 
Purdue CHPFossilGasIN12 
MarklandHydroWaterIN54 
Distributed generationRenewableSolarIN11 
Camp Atterbury BatteryRenewableStorageIN
Nabb BatteryRenewableStorageIN
Crane BatteryRenewableStorageIN
Total Duke Energy Indiana owns and operates Gibson Station Units 1 through 4 and is a joint owner of unit 5 with WVPA and IMPA. Duke Energy Indiana operates unit 5 and owns 50.05%.6,346

34


PROPERTIES


(d)Includes Cayuga Internal Combustion.Owned MW
Totals by TypeCapacity
Total Electric Utilities49,870
(e)Totals by Plant TypeJointly owned with WVPA. Duke Energy Indiana's ownership is 62.50% of the facility.
Nuclear8,908 
Fossil36,681 
Hydro3,639 
Renewable642 
Total Electric Utilities49,870
(a)Jointly owned with North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, NCEMC and PMPA. Duke Energy Carolinas' ownership is 19.25% of the facility.
(b)Jointly owned with NCEMC. Duke Energy Carolinas' ownership is 87.27% of the facility.
(c)Duke Energy Indiana owns and operates Gibson Station Units 1 through 4 and is a joint owner of unit 5 with WVPA and IMPA. Duke Energy Indiana operates unit 5 and owns 50.05%.
(d)Includes Cayuga Internal Combustion.
(e)Jointly owned with WVPA. Duke Energy Indiana's ownership is 62.5% of the facility.
The following table provides information related to Electric Utilities and Infrastructure'sEU&I's electric transmission and distribution properties as of December 31, 2019.
2022.
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
DukeEnergy
Energy
Carolinas
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
EnergyCarolinasProgressFloridaOhioIndiana
Electric Transmission Lines Electric Transmission Lines
Miles of 500 to 525 kilovolt (kV)1,036
576
292
168


Miles of 500 to 525 kilovolt (kV)1,100 600 300 200 — — 
Miles of 345 kV1,135



410
725
Miles of 345 kV1,100 — — — 400 700 
Miles of 230 kV8,349
2,658
3,399
1,638

654
Miles of 230 kV8,500 2,700 3,400 1,700 — 700 
Miles of 100 to 161 kV12,441
6,846
2,563
891
724
1,417
Miles of 100 to 161 kV12,500 6,800 2,600 1,000 700 1,400 
Miles of 13 to 69 kV8,351
2,988
12
2,200
612
2,539
Miles of 13 to 69 kV8,300 2,900 — 2,200 700 2,500 
Total conductor miles of electric transmission lines31,312
13,068
6,266
4,897
1,746
5,335
Total conductor miles of electric transmission lines31,500 13,000 6,300 5,100 1,800 5,300 
Electric Distribution Lines Electric Distribution Lines
Miles of overhead lines173,800
66,600
46,500
25,200
13,300
22,200
Miles of overhead lines173,600 66,600 46,300 25,300 13,300 22,100 
Miles of underground line106,300
39,500
30,700
20,900
6,100
9,100
Miles of underground line116,100 41,900 35,200 22,700 6,500 9,800 
Total conductor miles of electric distribution lines280,100
106,100
77,200
46,100
19,400
31,300
Total conductor miles of electric distribution lines289,700 108,500 81,500 48,000 19,800 31,900 
Number of electric transmission and distribution substations3,316
1,491
512
496
314
503
Number of electric transmission and distribution substations3,000 1,200 500 500 300 500 
Substantially all of Electric Utilities and Infrastructure'sEU&I's electric plant in service is mortgaged under indentures relating to Duke Energy Carolinas’, Duke Energy Progress', Duke Energy Florida's, Duke Energy Ohio’s and Duke Energy Indiana’s various series of First Mortgage Bonds.
GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I owns transmission pipelines and distribution mains that are generally underground, located near public streets and highways, or on property owned by others for which Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont have obtained the necessary legal rights to place and operate facilities on such property located within the Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I service territories. The following table provides information related to Gas Utilities and Infrastructure'sGU&I's natural gas distribution.
 Duke
 Duke
Duke
Energy
 DukeEnergy
Energy
Ohio
Piedmont
EnergyOhioPiedmont
Miles of natural gas distribution and transmission pipelines33,700
7,300
26,400
Miles of natural gas distribution and transmission pipelines35,200 7,600 27,600 
Miles of natural gas service lines27,200
6,300
20,900
Miles of natural gas service lines28,300 6,600 21,700 

35


PROPERTIES


COMMERCIAL RENEWABLES
The following table provides information related to Commercial Renewables' electric generation facilities as of December 31, 2019. The MW displayed in the table below are based on nameplate capacity.
    Owned MW
Ownership
FacilityPlant TypePrimary FuelLocationCapacity
Interest (%)
Commercial Renewables – Wind     
Los Vientos (five sites)RenewableWindTX465
51%
Mesteno(a)
RenewableWindTX202
100%
Sweetwater IVRenewableWindTX113
47%
FrontierRenewableWindOK103
51%
Top of the WorldRenewableWindWY102
51%
NotreesRenewableWindTX78
51%
Mesquite CreekRenewableWindTX55
26%
Campbell HillRenewableWindWY50
51%
IronwoodRenewableWindKS44
26%
Sweetwater VRenewableWindTX38
47%
North AlleghenyRenewableWindPA36
51%
Laurel HillRenewableWindPA35
51%
Cimarron IIRenewableWindKS33
26%
OcotilloRenewableWindTX30
51%
Kit CarsonRenewableWindCO26
51%
Silver SageRenewableWindWY21
51%
Happy JackRenewableWindWY15
51%
ShirleyRenewableWindWI10
51%
Total Renewables – Wind   1,456


Commercial Renewables – Solar     
North Rosamond(a)
RenewableSolarCA150
100%
Lapetus(a)
RenewableSolarTX100
100%
Conetoe IIRenewableSolarNC80
100%
Seville I & IIRenewableSolarCA34
67%
Rio Bravo I & IIRenewableSolarCA27
67%
Wildwood I & IIRenewableSolarCA23
67%
KelfordRenewableSolarNC22
100%
DogwoodRenewableSolarNC20
100%
Halifax AirportRenewableSolarNC20
100%
PasquotankRenewableSolarNC20
100%
ShawboroRenewableSolarNC20
100%
CaprockRenewableSolarNM17
67%
Creswell AlligoodRenewableSolarNC14
100%
PumpjackRenewableSolarCA13
67%
LongboatRenewableSolarCA13
67%
Shoreham(a)
RenewableSolarNY13
51%
Washington White PostRenewableSolarNC12
100%
WhitakersRenewableSolarNC12
100%
Highlander I & IIRenewableSolarCA11
51%
Other small solar(a)
RenewableSolarVarious177
Various
Total Renewables – Solar   798
 
Commercial Renewables – Fuel Cells     
2018 ESA Portfolio(a)
RenewableFuel CellVarious10
100%
Total Renewables – Fuel Cells   10
 
Commercial Renewables – Energy Storage     
Notrees Battery StorageRenewableStorageTX18
51%
Total Renewables – Energy Storage   18
 
Total Commercial Renewables   2,282
 
(a)Certain projects, including projects within Other small solar, are in tax-equity structures where investors have differing interests in the project's economic attributes. 100% of the tax-equity project's capacity is included in the table above.

36


PROPERTIES


OTHER
Duke Energy owns approximately 87.1 million square feet and leases approximately 22.7 million square feet of corporate, regional and district office space spread throughout its service territories. See Note 11, "Property, Plant and Equipment," for further information.
35

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS AND MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
For information regarding legal proceedings, including regulatory and environmental matters, see Note 4, “Regulatory Matters,” and Note 5, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
MTBE Litigation
On December 15, 2017, the state of Maryland filed suit in Baltimore City Circuit Court against Duke Energy Merchants and other defendants alleging contamination of state waters by MTBE leaking from gasoline storage tanks.tanks and is seeking an unspecified amount of monetary damages. MTBE is a gasoline additive intended to increase the oxygen levels in gasoline and make it burn cleaner. The case was removed from Baltimore City Circuit Court to federal District Court. Initial motions to dismiss filed by the defendants were denied by the court on September 4, 2019. The2019, and the matter is now in discovery. On December 18, 2020, the plaintiff and defendants selected 50 focus sites, none of which have filed answersany ties to Duke Energy Merchants. Discovery will be specific to those sites. At this time, Duke Energy Merchants has not engaged in settlement negotiations with the plaintiff and will pursue summary judgment after the completion of discovery.plaintiff has not reached a settlement agreement with any defendant. Duke Energy cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
In addition, the Duke Energy Registrants are, from time to time, parties to various lawsuits and regulatory proceedings in the ordinary course of their business. For information regarding legal proceedings, including regulatory and environmental matters, see Note 4, “Regulatory Matters,” and Note 5, “Commitments and Contingencies,” to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
This is not applicable for any of the Duke Energy Registrants.

36
37




SECURITIES INFORMATION


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
The common stock of Duke Energy is listed and traded on the NYSE (ticker symbol DUK). As of January 31, 2020,2023, there were 140,942were 127,329 Duke Energy common stockholders of record. For information on dividends, see the "Dividend Payments" section of Management's DiscussionDiscussion and Analysis.
There is no market for the common equity securities of the Subsidiary Registrants, all of which are directly or indirectly owned by Duke Energy. See Note 2, "Dispositions," to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the investment of a minority interest in Duke Energy Indiana.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
See Item 12 of Part III within this Annual Report for information regarding Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities for Fourth Quarter 20192022
ThereThere were no repurchases of equityequity securities during the fourth quarter of 2019.2022.
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Stock Performance Graph
The following performance graph compares the cumulative TSR from Duke Energy Corporation common stock, as compared with the Standard & Poor's 500 Stock Index (S&P 500) and the Philadelphia Utility Index for the past five years. The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on December 31, 2014,2017, in Duke Energy common stock, in the S&P 500 and in the Philadelphia Utility Index and that all dividends were reinvested. The stockholder return shown below for the five-year historical period may not be indicative of future performance.
chart-2477a98d2f3f5bfbb7e.jpgduk-20221231_g4.jpg
NYSE CEO Certification
Duke Energy has filed the certification of its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-KReport.
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
This is not applicable for any of the year ended December 31, 2019.

Duke Energy Registrants.
38
37





SELECTED FINANCIAL DATAMD&ADUKE ENERGY


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The following table provides selected financial data for the years of 2015 through 2019. See also Item 7.
(in millions, except per share amounts)2019
 2018
 2017
 2016
 2015
Statements of Operations(a)
         
Total operating revenues$25,079
 $24,521
 $23,565
 $22,743
 $22,371
Operating income5,709
 4,685
 5,625
 5,202
 4,974
Income from continuing operations3,578
 2,625
 3,070
 2,578
 2,654
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(7) 19
 (6) (408) 177
Net income3,571
 2,644
 3,064
 2,170
 2,831
Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders3,707
 2,666
 3,059
 2,152
 2,816
Common Stock Data         
Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Basic and diluted$5.07
 $3.73
 $4.37
 $3.71
 $3.80
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Basic and diluted$(0.01) $0.03
 $(0.01) $(0.60) $0.25
Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Basic and diluted$5.06
 $3.76
 $4.36
 $3.11
 $4.05
Dividends declared per share of common stock3.75
 3.64
 3.49
 3.36
 3.24
Balance Sheets         
Total assets$158,838
 $145,392
 $137,914
 $132,761
 $121,156
Long-term debt including finance leases, less current maturities54,985
 51,123
 49,035
 45,576
 36,842
(a)Significant transactions reflected in the results above include: (i) growth in Commercial Renewables from new tax equity solar projects placed in service in 2019 (see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies"); (ii) regulatory and legislative charges related to Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case orders and impairment charges in 2018 (see Notes 4, 12 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" and "Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates"); (iii) the sale of the International Disposal Group in 2016, including a loss on sale recorded within discontinued operations; and (iv) the acquisition of Piedmont in 2016, including losses on interest rate swaps related to the acquisition financing.


39




MD&ADUKE ENERGY


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Management’s Discussion and Analysis includes financial information prepared in accordance with GAAP in the U.S., as well as certain non-GAAP financial measures such as adjusted earnings and adjusted EPS discussed below. Generally, a non-GAAP financial measure is a numerical measure of financial performance, financial position or cash flows that excludes (or includes) amounts that are included in (or excluded from) the most directly comparable measure calculated and presented in accordance with GAAP. The non-GAAP financial measures should be viewed as a supplement to, and not a substitute for, financial measures presented in accordance with GAAP. Non-GAAP measures as presented herein may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by other companies.
The following combined Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is separately filed by Duke Energy Corporation and its subsidiaries. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Progress Energy, Inc., Duke Energy Progress, LLC, Duke Energy Florida, LLC, Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., Duke Energy Indiana, LLC and Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc..Inc. However, none of the registrants make any representation as to information related solely to Duke Energy or the subsidiary registrants of Duke Energy other than itself.
Management’s Discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017.2020.
See "Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations," in Duke Energy's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, filed with the SEC on February 28, 2019,24, 2022, for a discussion of variance drivers for the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, as compared to December 31, 2017.2020.
DUKE ENERGY
Duke Energy is an energy company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina. Duke Energy operates in the U.S. primarily through its wholly owneddirect and indirect subsidiaries, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont. When discussing Duke Energy’s consolidated financial information, it necessarily includes the results of the Subsidiary Registrants, which along with Duke Energy, are collectively referred to as the Duke Energy Registrants.
Executive Overview
At Duke Energy, thewe remain focused on continuing to advance our clean energy transition while maintaining affordability and reliability for our customers and delivering on our commitments to our communities, employees, investors, and other stakeholders. The fundamentals of our business are strong and allow us to deliver growth in earnings and dividends in a low-risk, predictable and transparent way. In 2019,2022, we metcontinued to make progress, navigating rising interest rates, volatile commodity prices and other macroeconomic headwinds while meeting our near-term financial commitments, executing on our strategic priorities, responding to severe weather and positionedexternal events, and continuing to provide the company for sustainable long-term growth.safe and reliable service that our communities depend on.
In 2022, we announced the sale of our commercial renewables business, filed the Carbon Plan with the NCUC, and continued to engage with the communities in our jurisdictions. We are focused onalso continue to make the investments necessary to support our ongoing clean energy transition and a business portfolio that will deliverdelivers a reliable and growing dividend, with 4% to 6% EPS growth through 2024. This growth is supported by our capital plan, timely cost-recovery mechanisms in most jurisdictions and our ability to manage our cost structure. The strength of our balance sheet is of vital importance to2022 representing the cost-effective financing of our growth strategy, and in 2019 we continued to strengthen it by issuing $2 billion of preferred equity and $2.5 billion of96th consecutive year Duke Energy paid a cash dividend on its common stock through a forward sales agreement which is expected to settle on or prior to December 31, 2020.stock.
Financial Results
chart-2051b954d7e7543ab18.jpgchart-55fced0db9ba521cbab.jpgduk-20221231_g5.jpgduk-20221231_g6.jpg
(a)See Results of Operations below for Duke Energy’s definition of adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS as well as a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net income available to Duke Energy and net income available to Duke Energy per diluted share.

(a)See Results of Operations below for Duke Energy’s definition of adjusted earnings and adjusted EPS as well as a reconciliation of this non-GAAP financial measure to net income available to Duke Energy and net income available to Duke Energy per basic share.
40
38




MD&ADUKE ENERGY


On February 9, 2023, Duke Energy announced 2022 full year reported earnings of $2,563 million, or $3.33 per share and adjusted earnings of $4,060 million, or $5.27 per share. On February 21, 2023, Duke Energy Indiana received an opinion from the Indiana Court of Appeals disallowing recovery of certain coal ash costs. As a result of this opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized a pretax charge of approximately $175 million to Impairment of assets and other charges for the year ended December 31, 2022. The 2022 full year reported earnings changed to $2,444 million, or $3.17 per share. There was no change to adjusted earnings or adjusted earnings per share.
Duke Energy's 20192022 Net Income Available to Duke Energy Corporation (GAAP Reported Earnings) werewas impacted by: favorable rate case and rider recovery outcomes, netprimarily by the estimated impairment on the sale of regulatory lag, and ongoing cost management effortsthe Commercial Renewables business in Electric Utilities and Infrastructure; improved margins and increased ACP investment in Gas Utilities and Infrastructure; and growth in project investments in Commercial Renewables.the current year. See “Results of Operations” below for a detailed discussion of the consolidated results of operations and a detailed discussion of financial results for each of Duke Energy’s reportable business segments, as well as Other where financing costs increased in 2019 to fund segment operations and other liquidity needs.Other.
20192022 Areas of Focus and Accomplishments
Operational Excellence, SafetyClean Energy Transition. Our industry continues to experience an unprecedented level of change and Reliability2022 was a dynamic year for our company as we navigated macroeconomic headwinds and continued to execute on our strategic priorities and deliver on our vision.
Generating Cleaner Energy
We’re targeting energy generated from coal to represent less than 5% by 2030 and a full exit by 2035, subject to regulatory approvals. We’ve made strong progress to date in reducing carbon emissions from electricity genera.tion (a 44% reduction from 2005) and have committed to do more (at least 50% reduction by 2030 and net-zero by 2050). In October 2022, we announced an additional interim target to reduce carbon emissions from electric generation by 80% by 2040. We also adopted a goal of reducing Scope 2 and certain Scope 3 emissions, including emissions from upstream purchased power and fossil fuel purchases, as well as downstream customer use of natural gas, by 50% by 2035, on the way to net-zero by 2050.
Duke Energy is one of the first utilities to address the totality of its impact – approximately 95% of the company's greenhouse gas emissions are now tied to a measurable net-zero goal. Over the next decade, we expect to deploy over $145 billion of capital into our regulated businesses, driven by clean energy transition investments. These investments will drive substantial economic benefits for the communities we serve and reduce our customer’s exposure to fuel volatility. We’ve filed and refined comprehensive IRPs consistent with this strategy in multiple jurisdictions, allowing us to accelerate coal plant retirements, make needed grid investments to enable renewables and energy storage, and increase resiliency. To partially fund this plan, in December 2022, we closed on the second and final tranche of the approximate $2 billion investment in Duke Energy Indiana by GIC.
In 2022, we were awarded one of two North Carolina offshore wind sites held by the Bureau of Ocean Energy Management. The reliableapproximately 55,000-acre site in the Atlantic Ocean east of Wilmington could support up to 1.6 gigawatts of potential offshore wind energy, enough to power nearly 375,000 homes. Securing this contract creates optionality for future offshore wind if the NCUC determines it's part of the least cost path to achieve North Carolina's interim and safe operationlong-term carbon reduction goals.
As we look beyond 2030, we will need additional tools to continue our progress. We will actively work to advocate for research and development and deployment of carbon-free, dispatchable resources. This includes longer-duration energy storage, advanced nuclear technologies, carbon capture and zero-carbon fuels.
Sale of Commercial Renewables
In November 2022, the Board approved pursuing the sale of our power plants,Commercial Renewables business, excluding the offshore wind contract for Carolina Long Bay. Since 2007, we have built a portfolio of approximately 5,000 megawatts of commercial wind, solar and battery projects across the U.S., and established a robust development pipeline. As we look forward to the remainder of this decade and beyond, we have line of sight to significant renewable, grid and other investment opportunities within our faster-growing regulated operations.
Carbon Plan
North Carolina House Bill 951 (HB 951) was passed in 2021 and reflects new state policy that accelerates a clean energy transition for generation serving customers in the Carolinas, including providing a framework for a goal of 70% carbon reduction in electric distribution systemgeneration in the state from 2005 levels by 2030 and natural gas infrastructure incarbon neutrality by 2050 while continuing to prioritize affordability and reliability for our communitiescustomers. The legislation established a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance state CO2 emission reductions through the use of least cost planning, including stakeholder involvement, and also introduced modernized recovery mechanisms, including multiyear rate plans (MYRP), that promote more efficient recovery of investments and performance-based regulation (PBR), that align incentives between the company and the state’s energy policy objectives.
In May 2022, we filed a proposed Carbon Plan with the NCUC that outlined potential pathways toward achieving the HB 951 carbon reduction targets while balancing affordability and reliability for our customers. We presented four “portfolios” – a base portfolio of what it would take to achieve 70% carbon reduction by 2030 and other portfolios demonstrating the impact of an extension to the 2030 compliance deadline to allow the introduction of new technologies at a more affordable price. In December 2022, the NCUC issued an order adopting its initial Carbon Plan, which included a set of near-term actions to support meeting the state's carbon reduction goals. This is foundationala constructive outcome that advances our clean energy transition, supporting a diverse, all-of-the-above approach that is essential for long-term resource planning.
Modernizing the Power Grid and Natural Gas Infrastructure
Our grid improvement programs continue to our customers, our financial results and our credibility with stakeholders. Our regulated generation fleet performance was strong throughout the year. Allbe a key component of our nuclear sites have achieved the industry’s highest distinction rating. Our electric distribution system performed well throughout the year, with outage durations down when adjusted for storms. The safety of our workforce is a core value. Our employees delivered strong safety results in 2019, and we are at or near the top of our industry.
Storm Response and System Restoration. The 2019 Atlantic hurricane season was the fourth consecutive year of above-average damaging storms. Our ability to effectively handle all facetsgrowth strategy. Modernization of the 2019electric grid, including smart meters, storm response effortshardening, self-healing and targeted undergrounding, helps to continue to ensure the system is a testamentbetter prepared for severe weather, improves the system's reliability and flexibility, and provides better information and services for customers. We continue to expand our team’s extensive preparationself-optimizing grid capabilities, and coordination, applying lessons learned from previous storms, andin 2022, smart, self-healing technologies helped to on-the-ground management throughout the restoration efforts. Notably in 2019 avoid more than 1.4 million customer interruptions across our six-state electric service area, saving customers more than 443 million minutes of lost outage time.
39

MD&ADUKE ENERGY
Duke Energy earned EEI’s Emergency Recovery Award, our 22nd EEI award since 1998has a demonstrated track record of driving efficiencies and a strong affirmation ofproductivity in the work of our employees to support customers when they need us most.
Customer Satisfaction. Duke Energy continues to transform the customer experience through our use of customer data to better inform operational priorities and performance levels. This data-driven approach allows us to identify the investments that are the most important to the customer experience. In 2019, we instituted billing and payment-related communications and options,business and we continue to leverage new technology, digital tools and data analytics across the business in response to a transforming landscape. In 2022, we filed for approval of a new demand response pilot program expected to launch in 2023 for customers in the Duke Energy Carolinas service area. Pilot incentives will reduce vehicle lease payments for program participants who lease an eligible electric vehicle, including Ford F-150 Lightning trucks. In exchange, customers will allow their electric vehicles to feed energy back to the grid – helping to balance it during peak demand. Also, in August 2022, Duke Energy Florida announced a research and development pilot program to test and evaluate the viability of the new Ford F-150 Lightning all-electric truck's high-capacity batteries as a grid edge resource.
Recognizing the importance of natural gas to our plans, we continue to work toward a net-zero methane emission goal by 2030 related to our natural gas distribution business. In our LDC business, we are making great progress reducing methane emissions through our partnership with Accenture, Microsoft and Avanade to use satellites and build an emissions platform, the addition of other sensors and technologies to find and fix leaks in near real time, and the use of cross compression to avoid releasing natural gas into the atmosphere during certain operational activities. Investments in integrity management of our natural gas infrastructure continue to be of importance to ensure reliable, safe, and increasingly clean delivery of natural gas to our customers.
Response to Macroeconomic Headwinds. In addition to achieving financial results in the upper half of our revised guidance, we continued our cost-management journey with a focus on driving productivity, increasing flexibility and prioritizing spend based on risk and strategic value to our customers and investors. In 2022, to address rising interest rates, increased commodity prices, labor and material inflation, and supply chain constraints, we launched the Workload Reduction Initiative, building on our culture of continuous improvement to identify more ways to reduce operating costs. Including cost reductions from supply chain, we identified approximately $300 million of savings opportunities focused on organization simplification, elimination of work, automation, reducing service levels provided to internal customers, and outsourcing.
Commodity prices have impacted the price of electricity in all of our jurisdictions. We actively worked to manage and maintain prices at lower levels than they otherwise would be in light of increased commodity prices, working with our regulators to extend recovery periods in certain jurisdictions in a way that is manageable for our customers. We also continued our work with our vulnerable customers through increased communications, securing state and federal funding, and providing access to philanthropic support. Additionally, we've created a specialized team that's partnered with agencies across our service territories and has helped connect customers to nearly $300 million in energy assistance funding since 2021.
We successfully navigated supply chain challenges including inflation, longer lead times, and shortages of solar panels and other equipment. We've executed longer supply agreements and proactively secured equipment in early 2022 for hurricane season while placing orders for key needs for our customer delivery organization for 2023. Our procurement teams continue to execute on action plans to enhance outage-related communicationsplanning, augment supply, amend operations and leverage our scale to customers.continue to mitigate these risks to the extent possible.
Constructive Regulatory and Legislative Outcomes. One of our long-term strategic goals is to achieve modernized regulatory constructs in our jurisdictions. Modernized constructs provide benefits, which include improved earnings and cash flows through more timely recovery of investments, as well as stable pricing for customers. In 2019, Duke Energy, North Carolina regulators and environmentalists reached an agreement to permanently close all remaining coal ash basins in North Carolina. This agreement reduces the cost to close our coal ash basins for our Carolinas customers in comparison to the initial NCDEQ closure order. In 2019 we achieved constructive rate case outcomes driving earnings growth through rate base increases in South Carolina (electric), North Carolina (natural gas), Ohio (electric distribution) and Kentucky (natural gas). In addition, we have a multiyear rate plan in Florida and gridGrid investment riders in the Midwest whichand Florida enable more timely cost recovery and earnings growth.growth and we have a MYRP in Florida through 2024. Additionally, as highlighted above, HB 951 provides the framework for many of the benefits of modernized regulatory constructs in North Carolina under the direction of the NCUC. Duke Energy Progress filed its first rate case utilizing these benefits, including both PBR and MYRP, in North Carolina in October 2022. In January 2023, we also filed a Duke Energy Carolinas rate case in North Carolina, which incorporates elements of PBR and MYRP.
In addition to the Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas rate cases in North Carolina, we continued to move a variety of other regulatory initiatives forward during 2022. Base rate cases were filed for both Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont in South Carolina, for Duke Energy Ohio's natural gas business, and for Duke Energy Kentucky's electric business. Constructive partial settlements were approved by the NCUC in January 2022 related to Piedmont's 2021 North Carolina rate case and by the PUCO in December 2022 related to Duke Energy Ohio's 2021 electric rate case. We also reached a constructive comprehensive settlement with all parties in the Duke Energy Progress South Carolina rate case in January 2023, which the PSCSC approved in February 2023. Duke Energy Indiana's TDSIC 2.0 was approved in June 2022 and Duke Energy Florida's 10 year storm protection plan was approved in October 2022, both of which provide for significant investments to improve the reliability and integrity of the grid in their respective jurisdictions. Overall, this was a very active year as it relates to regulatory filings, which reflects the important investments and ongoing clean energy transition across all our service territories.
In November 2022, the Southeast Energy Exchange Market (SEEM) announced it had initiated operations. The new SEEM platform facilitates sub-hourly, bilateral trading, allowing participants to buy and sell power close to the time the energy is consumed, utilizing available unreserved transmission and providing southeastern electricity customers cost, reliability and environmental benefits. Also in 2022, storm securitization legislation was passed in South Carolina, providing the opportunity to securitize deferred storm costs and lower the bill impacts for our customers. We also continue to evaluate the impacts of the Inflation Reduction Act, which is expected to have significant benefits to customers and lower the cost of the clean energy transition.
Digital Transformation. Duke Energy has a demonstrated track record of driving efficiencies and productivity into the business. We continue to leverage new technology, digital tools and data analytics across the business in response to a transforming landscapeCustomer Satisfaction. In 2019, we created a team dedicatedDuke Energy continues to developing applicationstransform the customer experience through our use of customer data to better inform operational priorities and other solutionsperformance levels. This data-driven approach allows us to deliver productivity gains and improvementsidentify the investments that are most important to the customer experience.
Modernizing In 2022, we successfully implemented the Power Grid. Our grid improvement programs continuelast of eight jurisdictional releases of Customer Connect, a new system that consolidates four legacy billing systems into one customer-service platform, allowing us to deliver the universal experience customers expect. While customer satisfaction across our industry continues to be a key componentimpacted by the macroeconomic environment and the impacts of higher fuel prices on customer bills, our growth strategy. Modernization of the electric grid, including smart meters, storm hardening, self-healing and targeted undergrounding helps to ensure the system is better prepared for severe weather, improves the system's reliability and flexibility, and provides better information and services for customers. In 2019, 79% of our jurisdictions were equipped with smart meters and we remain on trackwork continues to be fully deployed across all regionsrecognized by 2021. We continue to expand our self-optimizing grid capabilities, andcustomers, with incremental improvements in 2019 that saved over a half million customer interruptions. 
Generating Cleaner Energy. Overall, we have lowered our carbon emissionssatisfaction scores at certain jurisdictions including Piedmont, which was ranked number one in customer satisfaction by 39% since 2005, consistent with our new goal to reduce carbon emissions by at least 50% by 2030 and to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. Our commitmentJ.D. Power for 2030 includes retiring plants, operating our existing carbon-free resources and investing inresidential natural gas infrastructure, renewables and our energy delivery system. As we look beyond 2030, we will need additional tools to continue our progress. We will work actively to advocate for research and development of carbon-free, dispatchable resources. That includes longer-term energy storage, advanced nuclear technologies, carbon capture and zero-carbon fuels.service in the south.
Expanding the Natural Gas Platform. We continue to pursue natural gas infrastructure investments. While the judicial and administrative challenges to date have been substantial, we are committed to the construction of the ACP pipeline to bring low-cost gas supply and economic development opportunities to the Southeast U.S. Construction is underway on a liquefied natural gas facility in Robeson County, North Carolina, on property Piedmont owns. This investment will help Piedmont provide a reliable gas supply to customers during peak usage periods and protect customers from price volatility when there is a higher-than-normal demand for natural gas.
Dividend Growth. In 2019, Duke Energy continued to grow the dividend payment to shareholders. 2019 represented the 93rd consecutive year Duke Energy paid a cash dividend on its common stock.

4140




MD&ADUKE ENERGY

Operational Excellence, Safety and Reliability. The reliable and safe operation of our power plants, electric distribution system and natural gas infrastructure in our communities continues to be foundational to serving our customers, our financial results, and our credibility with stakeholders. This year presented unique challenges to the grid in our service territories, including attacks on two substations in Moore County, North Carolina and extreme winter weather that forced us to take unprecedented measures to ensure the integrity of our systems in North Carolina. Despite these recent challenges, our regulated generation fleet and nuclear sites had strong performance throughout the year and our electric distribution system performed well. The safety of our workforce is a core value. While our TICR was slightly above target, our employees continued to deliver strong safety results in 2022 and we remain an industry leader in personal safety. In addition, we continued our strong environmental performance, with no reportable environmental events.

Storm activity was severe in our service territories in 2022. Hurricane Ian, the fifth-strongest hurricane on record, impacted our service territories in Florida and the Carolinas with heavy rainfall, strong winds, and life-threatening storm surge and flooding. Across our service territories, we assembled more than 20,000 power line technicians, damage assessors, and vegetation workers to prepare and begin to restore power as soon as it was safe to do so. In total, we experienced 2 million outages, and thanks to their efforts, more than 97% of our Florida customers were restored within three days of the storm moving out of our Florida territories, and over 99% of our Carolinas customers within two days of the storm exiting the Carolinas. In November, Hurricane Nicole made landfall in Florida as a Category 1 hurricane causing nearly 300,000 customer outages. Our crews were able to restore more than 98% of those outages within 12 hours.
In December, high winds and extreme cold from Winter Storm Elliott, customer demand that was higher than forecasted, and inability to import additional power from out of state, resulted in the need to temporarily interrupt service to about 500,000 customers to maintain overall grid reliability and prevent further potential disruptions in the Carolinas. We will continue to further evaluate lessons learned to improve our strategy and communications, and incorporate any identified improvements to address this matter to better serve our customers now and in the future.
Our ability to effectively handle all facets of the 2022 storm response efforts, including navigating ongoing macroeconomic challenges and supply chain constraints, is a testament to our team’s extensive preparation and coordination, applying lessons learned from previous storms, and to on-the-ground management throughout the restoration efforts. Duke Energy has received over 20 Emergency Response Awards since EEI began recognizing storm response in 1998 (including nine for assisting other utilities). We received EEI’s Emergency Assistance Award for our support to other electric companies following Hurricane Ian, as well as EEI’s Emergency Recovery Award for multiple events that include our own recovery from Hurricane Ian, Winter Storm Izzy, and the July storms in the Midwest.
Duke Energy Objectives – 20202023 and Beyond
At Duke Energy, willour climate strategy is our business strategy – to safely transform and ready our system by investing in new and existing carbon-free technology, modernizing our gas and electric infrastructure, and expanding and integrating efficiency and demand management programs. As we transition our business to cleaner sources of energy, we are focused on delivering sustainable value for our customers and shareholders by maintaining affordability and leveraging business transformation to exceed customer expectations, optimizing investments to drive attractive shareholder returns, and providing new product offerings and solutions that deliver growth and customer value. To achieve these major milestones, we are shaping the landscape by partnering with stakeholders, championing public policy that advances innovation, and advancing regulatory models that support carbon and methane emission reductions.
Matters Impacting Future Results
The matters discussed herein could materially impact the future operating results, financial condition and cash flows of the Duke Energy Registrants and Business Segments.
Regulatory Matters
Coal Ash Costs
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress both have approximately $1.4 billion, in regulatory assets related to coal ash retirement obligations as of December 31, 2022. Future spending, including amounts recorded for depreciation and liability accretion, is expected to continue to deliver exceptional valuebe deferred and recovered in future rate cases or rider filings. The majority of spend is expected to customers, be an integral partoccur over the next 10 to 15 years.
Duke Energy Indiana has interpreted the CCR rule to identify the coal ash basin sites impacted and has assessed the amounts of coal ash subject to the rule and a method of compliance. Interpretation of the communitiesrequirements of the CCR rule is subject to further legal challenges and regulatory approvals, which could result in additional ash basin closure requirements, higher costs of compliance and greater AROs. Additionally, Duke Energy Indiana has retired facilities that are not subject to the CCR rule. Duke Energy Indiana may incur costs at these facilities to comply with environmental regulations or to mitigate risks associated with on-site storage of coal ash. In January 2022, Duke Energy Indiana received a letter from the EPA regarding interpretation of the CCR rule. Duke Energy Indiana has approximately $385 million in regulatory assets related to coal ash asset retirement obligations as of December 31, 2022. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies" for more information.
Fuel Cost Recovery
As a result of rapidly rising commodity costs, including natural gas, fuel and purchased power prices in excess of amounts included in fuel-related revenues has led to an increase in the undercollection of fuel costs from customers at certain jurisdictions including Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida. These amounts have been deferred in regulatory assets and have impacted the cash flows of the registrants, including increased borrowings to temporarily finance related expenditures until recovery. The Duke Energy Registrants are working with various state commissions on the timing of recovery of these amounts. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" for more information.
41

MD&ADUKE ENERGY
Commercial Renewables
In November 2022, Duke Energy committed to a plan to sell the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. The bid process for the utility-scale solar and wind group is ongoing. Initial indicative bids were received for the distributed generation group in January 2023. Duke Energy expects to dispose of both groups in the second half of 2023. The Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups were classified as held for sale and as discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2022. Duke Energy recorded an impairment loss in the fourth quarter of 2022. If necessary, the loss on the sale of the assets will be updated based on market changes or the final sales price, after any adjustments at closing for working capital and capital expenditures and could be materially different than the estimated loss. Additionally, certain other costs resulting from the transactions may be recognized in the period incurred, including Duke Energy's share of debt extinguishment costs and costs incurred to modify or terminate PPAs. Proceeds from the sales are expected to be used for debt avoidance. For more information, see Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Dispositions."
In February 2021, a severe winter storm impacted certain Commercial Renewables assets in Texas. Extreme weather conditions limited the ability for these solar and wind facilities to generate and sell electricity into the Electric Reliability Council of Texas market. Duke Energy has been named in multiple lawsuits arising out of this winter storm. The legal actions related to these lawsuits will remain with Duke Energy and any future activity related to the matters will be presented in discontinued operations. For more information, see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies."
Supply Chain
Duke Energy is monitoring supply chain disruptions, which we do businesscould impact the timing of in-service dates and provide attractive returns to investors. We have an achievable, long-term strategymay result in place, and it is producing tangible results, yet the industry in which we operate is becoming more and more dynamic. We are adjusting, where necessary, and accelerating our focus in key areas to ensure theadverse impacts on operating results. The company is well positionedalso monitoring the potential impacts on future financial results and clean energy goals due to be successful for many decades intosupply chain challenges regarding the future. As we look aheadavailability of transformers and renewable components like solar panels and batteries.
Other
Duke Energy is monitoring general market conditions, including rising interest rates, and evaluating the impact to 2020, our plans include:
Continuing to place the customer at the centerits results of all that we do which includes providing customized productsoperations, financial position and solutions
Strengthening our relationships with all our vast stakeholderscash flows in the communities in which we operate and investfuture.
Generating cleaner energy and working to achieve net-zero carbon emissions by 2050
Maintaining the safety of our communities and employees
Modernizing and strengthening the energy grid
Expanding the natural gas infrastructure
Deploying digital tools across our business
Results of Operations
Non-GAAP Measures
Management evaluates financial performance in part based on non-GAAP financial measures, including adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS. These items represent income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy common stockholders in dollar and per-shareper share amounts, adjusted for the dollar and per-shareper share impact of special items. As discussed below, special items include certain charges and credits, which management believes are not indicative of Duke Energy's ongoing performance. Management believes the presentation of adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS provides useful information to investors, as it provides them with an additional relevant comparison of Duke Energy’s performance across periods.
Management uses these non-GAAP financial measures for planning and forecasting, and for reporting financial results to the Board of Directors, employees, stockholders, analysts and investors. Adjusted diluted EPS is also used as a basis for employee incentive bonuses. The most directly comparable GAAP measures for adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS are GAAP Reported Earnings and Diluted EPS Available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders (GAAP Reported EPS), respectively.
Special items included in the periods presented include the following, which management believes do not reflect ongoing costs:
Impairment Charges in 2019Regulatory matters and litigation represents a reductionthe net impact of a prior year impairment at Citrus County CC and an OTTI on the remaining investment in Constitution. For 2018, it represents an impairment at Citrus County CC, a goodwill impairment at Commercial Renewables and an OTTI of an investment in Constitution.
Costs to Achieve Mergers represents charges that result from strategic acquisitions.
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts in 2018 represents charges related to the Duke Energy ProgressIndiana court rulings on coal ash and other unrelated ongoing litigation.
Workplace and workforce realignment represents costs attributable to business transformation, including long-term real estate strategy changes and workforce reduction.
Regulatory settlements represents an impairment charge related to the South Carolina Supreme Court decision on coal ash, insurance proceeds and Duke Energy Carolinas North Carolina rate case orders and Duke Energy Progress coal ash settlement.
Gas pipeline investments represents additional exit obligations related to ACP.
Discontinued operations primarily includes results from Duke Energy's Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups, including an estimated impairment on the repealsale of the South Carolina Base Load Review Act.
Sale of Retired Plant represents the loss associated with selling Beckjord, a nonregulated generating facilitybusiness in Ohio.
Impacts of the Tax Act represents amounts recognized related to the Tax Act.
Severance Charges relate to companywide initiatives, excluding merger integration, to standardize processes and systems, leverage technology and workforce optimization.2022.
Duke Energy’s adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS may not be comparable to similarly titled measures of another company because other companies may not calculate the measures in the same manner.

42




MD&ADUKE ENERGY


Reconciliation of GAAP Reported Amounts to Adjusted Amounts
The following table presents a reconciliation of adjusted earnings and adjusted diluted EPS to the most directly comparable GAAP measures.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 
(in millions, except per share amounts)Earnings EPS Earnings EPS 
GAAP Reported Earnings/EPS$3,707
 $5.06
 $2,666
 $3.76
 
Adjustments to Reported:        
Impairment Charges(a)
(8) (0.01) 179
 0.25
 
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger(b)

 
 65
 0.09
 
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts(c)

 
 202
 0.29
 
Sale of Retired Plant(d)

 
 82
 0.12
 
Impacts of the Tax Act(e)

 
 20
 0.03
 
Severance Charges(f)

 
 144
 0.21
 
Discontinued Operations7
 0.01
 (19) (0.03) 
Adjusted Earnings/Adjusted Diluted EPS$3,706
 $5.06
 $3,339
 $4.72
 
 Years Ended December 31,
20222021
(in millions, except per share amounts)EarningsEPSEarningsEPS
GAAP Reported Earnings/EPS$2,444 $3.17 $3,802 $4.94 
Adjustments to Reported:
Regulatory Matters and Litigation(a)
295 0.39 — — 
Workplace and Workforce Realignment(b)
105 0.14 148 0.20 
Regulatory Settlements(c)
  69 0.09 
Gas Pipeline Investments(d)
  15 0.02 
Discontinued Operations(e)
1,216 1.57 (197)(0.26)
Adjusted Earnings/Adjusted EPS$4,060 $5.27 $3,837 $4.99 
(a)Net of tax expense of $3 million in 2019. Net of tax benefit of $27 million and Noncontrolling Interests of $2 million in 2018.
(b)Net of tax benefit of $19 million.
(c)Net of tax benefit of $63 million.
(d)Net of $25 million tax benefit.
(e)The Tax Act reduced the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As the tax change was enacted in 2017, Duke Energy was required to remeasure its existing deferred tax assets and liabilities at the lower rate at December 31, 2017. For Duke Energy's regulated operations, where the reduction in the net accumulated deferred income tax liability is expected to be returned to customers in future rates, the remeasurement has been deferred as a regulatory liability. This amount represents a true up of existing regulatory liabilities related to the Tax Act. See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Income Taxes" for more information.
(f)Net of tax benefit of $43 million.
Year Ended(a)    Net of tax benefit of $128 million. $386 million recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $46 million within Regulated electric (Operating Revenues) and $34 million within Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. $25 million recorded within Operations, maintenance and other.
(b)    Net of tax benefit of $31 million and tax benefit of $44 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018
GAAP Reported EPS was $5.062022, and 2021, respectively. $72 million recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $71 million recorded within Operations, maintenance and other and a $7 million gain recorded in Gains on sales of other assets and other for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to $3.762022. $133 million recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $42 million within Operations, maintenance and other, and $17 million within Depreciation and amortization for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021.
(c)    Net of tax benefit of $21 million. $202 million of expense recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $111 million of income within Other income and expenses, $12 million of expense within Operations, maintenance and other, $28 million of income within Regulated electric operating revenues, $8 million of expense within Interest expense and $7 million of expense within Depreciation and amortization.
(d)    Net of tax benefit of $5 million. $20 million loss recorded within Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates.
(e)    Recorded in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax, and Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests.
Year Ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 2021
GAAP Reported EPS was $3.17 for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to $4.94 for the year ended December 31, 2021. The increasedecrease in GAAP Reported earningsEarnings/EPS was primarily due to current year favorable rate case and rider recovery outcomes, an adjustment related to income tax recognition for equity method investments, growth inthe estimated impairment on the sale of the Commercial Renewables from new solar farms commencing commercial operations and prior year regulatory and legislative impacts, impairments, severance, loss on sale of a retired plant and costs to achieve merger. This favorability was partially offset by higher depreciation and higher financing costsDisposal Groups in the current year. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years.
As discussed and shown in the table above, management also evaluates financial performance based on adjusted diluted EPS. Duke Energy’s adjusted diluted EPS was $5.06$5.27 for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, compared to $4.72$4.99 for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The increase in Adjusted Earnings/Adjusted EPS was primarily due to higher volumes, favorable weather and rate case contributions, partially offset by higher financing costs, higher depreciation and property taxes on a growing asset base, storm costs and unfavorable market impacts.
SEGMENT RESULTS
The remaining information presented in this discussion of results of operations is on a GAAP basis. Management evaluates segment performance based on segment income. Segment income is defined as income from continuing operations net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests and preferred stock dividends. Segment income includes intercompany revenues and expenses that are eliminated in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Duke Energy's segment structure includes the following segments: Electric Utilities and Infrastructure (EU&I) and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables.(GU&I). The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other. See Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Business Segments,” for additional information on Duke Energy’s segment structure.

43





MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE


Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019

2018

Variance

(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$22,831
 $22,273
 $558
 Operating Revenues$26,024 $22,603 $3,421 
Operating Expenses    

 Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power6,904
 6,917
 (13) Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power8,862 6,332 2,530 
Operations, maintenance and other5,497
 5,631
 (134) Operations, maintenance and other5,354 5,340 14 
Depreciation and amortization3,951
 3,523
 428
 Depreciation and amortization4,550 4,251 299 
Property and other taxes1,175
 1,134
 41
 Property and other taxes1,315 1,233 82 
Impairment charges(8) 309
 (317) 
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges374 204 170 
Total operating expenses17,519
 17,514
 5
 Total operating expenses20,455 17,360 3,095 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net1
 8
 (7) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net7 13 (6)
Operating Income5,313
 4,767
 546
 Operating Income5,576 5,256 320 
Other Income and Expenses, net353
 378
 (25) Other Income and Expenses, net467 534 (67)
Interest Expense1,345
 1,288
 57
 Interest Expense1,565 1,432 133 
Income Before Income Taxes4,321
 3,857
 464
 Income Before Income Taxes4,478 4,358 120 
Income Tax Expense785
 799
 (14) Income Tax Expense536 494 42 
Less: Income Attributable to Noncontrolling InterestLess: Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interest13 14 (1)
Segment Income$3,536
 $3,058
 $478
 Segment Income$3,929 $3,850 $79 
      
Duke Energy Carolinas GWh sales89,920
 92,280
 (2,360) Duke Energy Carolinas GWh sales90,915 87,796 3,119 
Duke Energy Progress GWh sales68,356
 69,331
 (975) Duke Energy Progress GWh sales70,435 66,797 3,638 
Duke Energy Florida GWh sales42,173
 41,559
 614
 Duke Energy Florida GWh sales46,214 42,422 3,792 
Duke Energy Ohio GWh sales24,729
 25,329
 (600) Duke Energy Ohio GWh sales24,269 24,129 140 
Duke Energy Indiana GWh sales31,886
 34,229
 (2,343) Duke Energy Indiana GWh sales31,979 31,388 591 
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure GWh sales257,064
 262,728
 (5,664) Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure GWh sales263,812 252,532 11,280 
Net proportional MW capacity in operation50,070
 49,684
 386
 Net proportional MW capacity in operation49,539 49,871 (332)
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
EU&I’s higher segment income
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure’s results were impacted by positive contributions from the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina and South Carolina rate cases and Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments is due to the Citrus County CC being placed in service. These drivers werehigher retail sales volumes and favorable weather, partially offset by higher depreciation from a growing asset base and higher interest expense. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.
Operating Revenues.The variance was driven primarily by:
a $603$2,332 million increase in fuel revenues primarily due to higher fuel prices and retail sales volumes;
a $456 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;
a $293 million increase in retail base rate pricing due to general rate cases in North Carolina, net of rider impacts as well as multiyear rate adjustments in Florida;
a $145 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather compared to prior year;
a $141 million increase in wholesale revenues primarily due to the Duke Energy Carolinashigher capacity volumes; and Duke Energy Progress
a $137 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to higher sales volumes and storm securitization in North Carolina and South Carolina rate cases and Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service.Carolina.
Partially offset by:
a $45an $86 million decrease in weather-normal retail sales volumes.capacity revenue primarily due to accelerated recovery of the retired coal units Crystal River 1 and 2 in 2021; and
a $67 million decrease due to the Indiana Supreme Court ruling on recovery of certain coal ash costs.
Operating Expenses.The variance was driven primarily by:
a $428$2,530 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power due to higher fuel prices and volumes from customer demand;
a $299 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to additionalhigher plant in service and new depreciation rates associated with the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina and South Carolinaresolution of prior year rate cases, partially offset by lower depreciation related to the extension of the lives of nuclear facilities;
a $170 million increase in impairment of assets and Duke Energy Florida's Citrus County CC being placed in service;other charges due to the Indiana court rulings on recovery of certain coal ash costs; and
a $41an $82 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to higher property taxes for additional plant in service at Duke Energy Florida and current year property tax reassessments at Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Ohio.
Partially offset by:
a $317 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to the impacts associated with the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate cases as well as impairment impactshigher revenue related to Duke Energy Florida's Citrus County CC; andtaxes.
a $134 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to lower payroll and benefit costs resulting from prior year workforce reductions and lower storm costs at Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas in the current year.
44

MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was drivenis primarily due to coal ash insurance litigation proceeds received in the prior year, partially offset by an increase in AFUDC equity return ending on the Citrus County CC in the fourth quarter of 2018 at Duke Energy Florida.due to higher capital expenditures.

44




MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - ELECTRIC UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE


Interest Expense. The variance was primarily driven primarily by higher interest rates and outstanding debt outstanding in the current year and AFUDC debt return ending in the fourth quarter of 2018 on the Citrus County CC at Duke Energy Florida.balances.
Income Tax Expense. The decreaseincrease in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income and a decrease in the amortization of excess deferred taxes, mostly offset by an increase in pretax income.taxes. The ETRs for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, were 18.2%12.0% and 20.7%11.3%, respectively. The decreaseincrease in the ETR was primarily due to an increasea decrease in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.
Matters Impacting Future Electric Utilities and Infrastructure Results
On December 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress entered into a settlement agreement with NCDEQ and certain community groups under which Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress agreed to excavate seven of the nine remaining coal ash basins in North Carolina with ash moved to on-site lined landfills. At the two remaining basins, uncapped basin ash will be excavated and moved to lined landfills. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of these ash basins could have an adverse impact on Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 4 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.
On May 21, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress received orders from the PSCSC granting the companies’ requests for retail rate increases but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed notices of appeals with the South Carolina Supreme Court on November 15, 2019. Appellant briefs are due on March 2, 2020, and Appellee response briefs are due on May 15, 2020. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
On June 22, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas received an order from the NCUC, which denied the Grid Rider Stipulation and deferral treatment of grid improvement costs. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have petitioned for deferral of future grid improvement costs in their 2019 rate cases. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid improvement costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.
During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida’s service territories were impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages to the service territories of Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress. Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was also impacted by Hurricane Michael, a Category 5 hurricane and the most powerful storm to hit the Florida Panhandle in recorded history. In September 2019, Hurricane Dorian impacted Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida's service territories. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms has been deferred. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
In 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC, and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed general rate cases with the NCUC. The outcome of these rate cases could materially impact Electric Utilities and Infrastructure's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
On April 17, 2015, the EPA published in the Federal Register a rule to regulate the disposal of CCR from electric utilities as solid waste. Duke Energy Indiana has interpreted the rule to identify the coal ash basin sites impacted and has assessed the amounts of coal ash subject to the rule and a method of compliance. Duke Energy Indiana's interpretation of the requirements of the CCR rule is subject to potential legal challenges and further regulatory approvals, which could result in additional ash basin closure requirements, higher costs of compliance and greater AROs. Additionally, Duke Energy Indiana has retired facilities that are not subject to the CCR rule. Duke Energy Indiana may incur costs at these facilities to comply with environmental regulations or to mitigate risks associated with on-site storage of coal ash. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of ash basins could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Indiana's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.

45




MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE


Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
 (in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$1,866
 $1,881
 $(15) Operating Revenues$2,840 $2,112 $728 
Operating Expenses    

 Operating Expenses
Cost of natural gas627
 697
 (70) Cost of natural gas1,276 705 571 
Operation, maintenance and other446
 421
 25
 Operation, maintenance and other532 442 90 
Depreciation and amortization256
 245
 11
 Depreciation and amortization327 303 24 
Property and other taxes106
 107
 (1) Property and other taxes138 120 18 
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges(12)19 (31)
Total operating expenses1,435

1,470
 (35) Total operating expenses2,261 1,589 672 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, netGains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net1 — 
Operating Income431
 411
 20
 Operating Income580 523 57 
Other Income and Expenses, net140
 47
 93
 
Other income and expenses, netOther income and expenses, net78 70 
Interest Expense117
 106
 11
 Interest Expense182 142 40 
Income Before Income Taxes454
 352
 102
 Income Before Income Taxes476 451 25 
Income Tax Expense22
 78
 (56) Income Tax Expense8 55 (47)
Segment Income$432
 $274
 $158
 Segment Income$468 $396 $72 
      
Piedmont Local Distribution Company (LDC) throughput (Dth)511,243,774
 557,145,128
 (45,901,354) Piedmont Local Distribution Company (LDC) throughput (Dth)628,035,471 542,759,891 85,275,580 
Duke Energy Midwest LDC throughput (MCF)89,025,972
 90,604,833
 (1,578,861) Duke Energy Midwest LDC throughput (MCF)90,010,669 85,787,624 4,223,045 
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’sGU&I’s results were impacted primarily impactedby margin growth, partially offset by higher equity earnings at ACP, the OTTI recorded on the Constitution investmentoperation and a 2019 adjustment related to the income tax recognition for equity method investments. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterialmaintenance costs and relates to prior years.higher interest expense. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $70$383 million decreaseincrease due to lowerhigher natural gas costs passed through to customers;customers and higher volumes;
a $13$213 million decreaseincrease due to increased secondary marketing activity including higher off-system sales natural gas costs;
a $64 million increase due to base rate increases;
a $48 million increase due to rider revenues related to MGPOhio Capital Expenditure Program (CEP); and Accelerated Main Replacement Program.
a $4 million increase due to customer growth.
Partially offset by:
a $37$15 million increasedecrease due to North Carolina and Kentucky base rate case increases;
a $19 million increase due to North Carolina and Tennessee IMR increases; and
an $11 million increase due to NCUC approval related to tax reform accounting from fixed rate contracts.the MGP Settlement.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $70$383 million decreaseincrease in the cost of natural gas due to lowerhigher natural gas prices.costs passed through to customers and higher volumes;
Partially offset by:
a $25$188 million increase in operation,cost of natural gas due to increased secondary marketing activity including higher off-system sales natural gas costs;
a $90 million increase in operations, maintenance and other expense primarily due to increasedthe MGP settlement, higher spend on internal and contract labor benefitscosts, locates, fleet, and information technology costs; andmaterials;
an $11a $24 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense due to additional plant in service.service and lower CEP deferrals; and
Other Incomean $18 million increase in property and Expenses, net. other taxes due to lower CEP deferrals.
Partially offset by:
a $31 million decrease in impairment of assets and other charges due to an impairment of propane caverns in 2021, which was partially reversed in 2022.
45

MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE
Interest Expense.The increasevariance was primarily due to higher equity earnings at ACP as a result of higher cumulative project spendinginterest rates and a higher OTTI recorded on the Constitution investment in the prior year.
Interest Expense. The variance was driven by higheroutstanding debt outstanding in the current yearbalances and higher interest expense due to customers as a result of tax reform deferrals, partially offset by favorable AFUDC debt interest.lower CEP Rider deferrals.
Income Tax Expense. The decrease in tax expense was primarily due to an adjustmentincrease in the amortization of excess deferred taxes related to the income tax recognition for equity method
investments,Ohio MGP Settlement, partially offset by an increase in pretax income. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years. The ETRs for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, were 4.8%1.7% and 22.2%12.2%, respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to an adjustmentincrease in the amortization of excess deferred taxes related to the income tax recognition for equity method investments that was recorded during the first quarter of 2019 and current year AFUDC equity. The equity method investment adjustment was immaterial and relates to prior years.Ohio MGP Settlement.

46

Other

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$122 $113 $
Operating Expenses298 409 (111)
Gains (Losses) on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net14 (1)15 
Operating Loss(162)(297)135 
Other Income and Expenses, net65 125 (60)
Interest Expense778 643 135 
Loss Before Income Taxes(875)(815)(60)
Income Tax Benefit(244)(281)37 
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests (1)
Less: Preferred Dividends106 106— 
Net Loss$(737)$(641)$(96)


MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - GAS UTILITIES AND INFRASTRUCTURE


Matters Impacting Future Gas Utilities and Infrastructure Results
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure has a 47% ownership interest in ACP, which is building an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline intended to transport diverse natural gas supplies into southeastern markets. Affected states (West Virginia, Virginia and North Carolina) have issued certain necessary permits; the project remains subject to other pending federal and state approvals, which will allow full construction activities to begin. In 2018, FERC issued a series of Notices to Proceed, which authorized the project to begin certain construction-related activities along the pipeline route. Given legal challenges and ongoing discussions with customers, ACP expects mechanical completion of the full project in late 2021 with in-service likely in the first half of 2022. The delays resulting from legal challenges have also impacted the cost for the project. Project cost is approximately $8 billion, excluding financing costs. This estimate is based on the current facts available around construction costs and timelines, and is subject to future changes as those facts develop. Abnormal weather, work delays (including delays due to judicial or regulatory action) and other conditions may result in cost or schedule modifications, a suspension of AFUDC for ACP and/or impairment charges potentially material to Duke Energy's cash flows, financial position and results of operations. ACP and Duke Energy will continue to consider their options with respect to the foregoing given their existing contractual and legal obligations. See Notes 4 and 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Variable Interest Entities," respectively, for additional information.
On November 13, 2013, the PUCO issued an order authorizing recovery of MGP costs at certain sites in Ohio with a deadline to complete the MGP environmental investigation and remediation work prior to December 31, 2016. This deadline was subsequently extended to December 31, 2019. Duke Energy Ohio has filed a request for extension of the deadline. A hearing on that request has not been scheduled. Disallowance of costs incurred, failure to complete the work by the deadline or failure to obtain an extension from the PUCO could result in an adverse impact on Gas Utilities and Infrastructure’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
Commercial Renewables
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
 
Operating Revenues$487
 $477
 $10
 
Operating Expenses    

 
Operation, maintenance and other297
 304
 (7) 
Depreciation and amortization168
 155
 13
 
Property and other taxes23
 25
 (2) 
Impairment charges
 93
 (93) 
Total operating expenses488
 577
 (89) 
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net(3) (1) (2) 
Operating Loss(4) (101) 97
 
Other Income and Expenses, net5
 23
 (18) 
Interest Expense95
 88
 7
 
Loss Before Income Taxes(94) (166) 72
 
Income Tax Benefit(115) (147) 32
 
Less: Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(177) (28) (149) 
Segment Income$198
 $9
 $189
 
       
Renewable plant production, GWh 8,574
 8,522
 52
 
Net proportional MW capacity in operation(a)
3,485
 2,991
 494
 
(a)Certain projects are included in tax-equity structures where investors have differing interests in the project's economic attributes. In the table above, 100% of the tax-equity project's capacity is included.
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Commercial Renewables' results were favorable primarily due to new taxThe higher net loss was driven by higher interest expense and lower return on investments, partially offset by higher equity solar projects inearnings from the current yearNMC investment and a prior year goodwill impairment charge. The following is a detailed discussion ofobligations to the variance drivers by line item.
Operating Revenues. The increase was primarily due to new solar projects placed in service and higher irradiance.Duke Energy Foundation.
Operating Expenses. The decrease was primarily due to a goodwill impairment charge in thedriven by prior year partially offset by increased depreciation dueobligations to new solar projects placed in service.the Duke Energy Foundation, lower expense on certain employee benefit obligations and lower asset impairments to optimize the company's real estate portfolio and reduce office space.
Other Income and Expenses, net.The decreasevariance was primarily due to incomelower return on investments that fund certain employee benefit obligations, partially offset by higher equity earnings from the FES settlement agreement in the prior year.NMC investment.
Interest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher interest rates and outstanding debt balances.
Income Tax Benefit. The decrease in the tax benefit was primarily due to a reduction of a valuation allowance relating to a capital loss carryforward in the prior year, partially offset by lower state tax benefit in the prior year. The ETRs for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, were 27.9% and 34.5%, respectively. The decrease in the ETR was primarily due to a reduction of a valuation allowance relating to a capital loss carryforward in the prior year.
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS, NET OF TAX
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Loss From Discontinued Operations, net of tax$(1,323)$(144)$(1,179)
Year Ended December 31, 2022, as compared to December 31, 2021
The variance was primarily driven by taxes associated with Duke Energy's interestthe estimated impairment on the sale of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups in tax equity solar projects recorded during 2019 and a reduction in PTCs generated.

the current year.
47
46





MD&ASEGMENT RESULTS - COMMERCIAL RENEWABLES


Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests. The variance was primarily due to an increase in solar projects with tax equity investors. HLBV accounting was utilized, resulting in allocation of losses to the noncontrolling interest partners. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies" for more information.
Matters Impacting Future Commercial Renewables Results
Commercial Renewables continues to experience growth with tax equity projects; however, the future expiration of federal tax incentives could result in adverse impacts to future results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
During 2019, Duke Energy evaluated recoverability of its renewable merchant plants principally in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas West market, due to declining market pricing and declining long-term forecasted energy prices, primarily driven by lower forecasted natural gas prices. These assets were not impaired; however, a continued decline in energy market pricing would likely result in a future impairment. Impairment of these assets could result in adverse impacts to the future results of operations, financial position and cash flows of Commercial Renewables. See Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Property, Plant and Equipment," for additional information.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
Other
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
 
Operating Revenues$95
 $89
 $6
 
Operating Expenses117
 380
 (263) 
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net(2) (96) 94
 
Operating Loss(24) (387) 363
 
Other Income and Expenses, net145
 73
 72
 
Interest Expense705
 657
 48
 
Loss Before Income Taxes(584) (971) 387
 
Income Tax Benefit(173) (282) 109
 
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 5
 (5) 
Less: Preferred Dividends41
 
 41
 
Net Loss$(452) $(694) $242
 
Year Ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018
The variance was driven by the prior year severance charges related to a corporate initiative, prior year loss on sale of the retired Beckjord station, and the absence in the current year of costs related to the Piedmont acquisition, offset by obligations to the Duke Energy Foundation in 2019. The following is a detailed discussion of the variance drivers by line item.
Operating Expenses. The variance was primarily due to prior year severance charges related to a corporate initiative as well as costs associated with the Piedmont acquisition, partially offset by obligations to the Duke Energy Foundation in 2019.
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. The variance was driven by the prior year loss on sale of the retired Beckjord station, including the transfer of coal ash basins and other real property and indemnification from all potential future claims related to the property, whether arising under environmental laws or otherwise.
Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was primarily due to higher returns on investments that fund certain employee benefit obligations and Bison investment income.
Interest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher outstanding debt in the current year and higher short-term interest rates.
Income Tax Benefit. The decrease in the tax benefit was primarily driven by a decrease in pretax losses.
Preferred Dividends. The variance was driven by the declarations of preferred stock dividend on preferred stock issued in 2019.
Matters Impacting Future Other Results
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.

48




MD&ADUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS


SUBSIDIARY REGISTRANTS
Basis of Presentation
The results of operations and variance discussion for the Subsidiary Registrants is presented in a reduced disclosure format in accordance with General Instruction (I)(2)(a) of Form 10-K.
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$7,395
 $7,300
 $95
Operating Revenues$7,857 $7,102 $755 
Operating Expenses    

Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power1,804
 1,821
 (17)Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,015 1,601 414 
Operation, maintenance and other1,868
 2,130
 (262)Operation, maintenance and other1,892 1,833 59 
Depreciation and amortization1,388
 1,201
 187
Depreciation and amortization1,526 1,468 58 
Property and other taxes292
 295
 (3)Property and other taxes340 320 20 
Impairment charges17
 192
 (175)
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges26 227 (201)
Total operating expenses5,369
 5,639
 (270)Total operating expenses5,799 5,449 350 
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 (1) 1
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, netGains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net4 
Operating Income2,026
 1,660
 366
Operating Income2,062 1,655 407 
Other Income and Expenses, net151
 153
 (2)Other Income and Expenses, net221 270 (49)
Interest Expense463
 439
 24
Interest Expense557 538 19 
Income Before Income Taxes1,714
 1,374
 340
Income Before Income Taxes1,726 1,387 339 
Income Tax Expense311
 303
 8
Income Tax Expense126 51 75 
Net Income$1,403
 $1,071
 $332
Net Income$1,600 $1,336 $264 
The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales and average number of customers for Duke Energy Carolinas. The below percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2019 2018
Residential sales(2.9)% 11.7 %
General service sales(0.1)% 4.5 %
Industrial sales(1.9)% (0.3)%
Wholesale power sales(13.6)% 12.5 %
Joint dispatch sales4.7 % 23.1 %
Total sales(2.6)% 5.7 %
Average number of customers2.1 % 1.5 %
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2022
Residential sales0.5%
General service sales4.0%
Industrial sales1.0%
Wholesale power sales1.3%
Joint dispatch sales0.9%
Total sales3.6%
Average number of customers1.8%
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $178$396 million increase in fuel revenues driven by higher fuel prices and higher volumes;
a $156 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;
a $78 million increase in retail pricingsales due to the impacts of thefavorable weather compared to prior yearyear;
a $63 million increase due to higher pricing from the North Carolina retail rate case, net of a return of EDIT to customers; and the current year South Carolina rate case.
Partially offset by:
a $41$52 million decreaseincrease in rider revenues primarily due to excess deferred taxes, partially offset by EE programsenergy efficiency, storm securitization, and a decrement rider relating to nuclear decommissioning that ended in the prior year;
a $14 million decrease in weather-normal retail sales volumes; and
a $7 million decrease in retail sales, netcompetitive procurement of fuel revenues, due to unfavorable weather in the current year.renewable energy programs.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $262 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to decreased labor and storm restoration costs; and
a $175 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to impacts of the prior year North Carolina rate order, the repeal of the South Carolina Base Load Review Act and charges related to coal ash costs in South Carolina.

49




MD&ADUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS


Partially offset by:
a $187 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to additional plant in service, new depreciation rates associated with the prior year North Carolina rate case and the current year South Carolina rate case and higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs associated with the prior year North Carolina rate case.
Interest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher debt outstanding in the current year.
Matters Impacting Future Results
On December 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas entered into a settlement agreement with NCDEQ and certain community groups under which Duke Energy Carolinas agreed to excavate five of the six remaining coal ash basins in North Carolina with ash moved to on-site lined landfills. At the one remaining basin, uncapped basin ash will be excavated and moved to lined landfills. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of these ash basins could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Carolinas’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 4 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.
Duke Energy Carolinas filed a general rate case with the NCUC on September 30, 2019. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Duke Energy Carolina's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
On May 21, 2019, the PSCSC issued an order granting Duke Energy Carolinas request for a retail rate increase but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. Duke Energy Carolinas filed a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court on November 15, 2019. Appellant briefs are due on March 2, 2020, and Appellee response briefs are due on May 15, 2020. Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
On June 22, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas received an order from the NCUC, which denied the Grid Rider Stipulation and deferral treatment of grid improvement costs. Duke Energy Carolinas has petitioned for deferral of future grid improvement costs in its 2019 rate case. Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid improvement costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.
During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas’ service territory was impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages in the service territory. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms has been deferred. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Carolinas' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
PROGRESS ENERGY
Results of Operations
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
Operating Revenues$11,202
 $10,728
 $474
Operating Expenses     
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power4,024
 3,976
 48
Operation, maintenance and other2,495
 2,613
 (118)
Depreciation and amortization1,845
 1,619
 226
Property and other taxes561
 529
 32
Impairment charges(24) 87
 (111)
Total operating expenses8,901
 8,824
 77
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 24
 (24)
Operating Income2,301
 1,928
 373
Other Income and Expenses, net141
 165
 (24)
Interest Expense862
 842
 20
Income Before Income Taxes1,580
 1,251
 329
Income Tax Expense253
 218
 35
Net Income1,327
 1,033
 294
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 6
 (6)
Net Income Attributable to Parent$1,327
 $1,027
 $300

50




MD&APROGRESS ENERGY


Year Ended December 31, 2019, as compared to 2018
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $366 million increase in retail pricing primarily due to the impacts of the prior year North Carolina rate case and current year South Carolina rate case at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service and annual increases from the 2017 Settlement Agreement;
a $70 million increase in wholesale power revenues, net of fuel, primarily due to coal ash cost recovery in the current year at Duke Energy Progress and increased demand at Duke Energy Florida;
a $42 million increase in fuel revenues primarily related to increased fuel cost recovery due to extreme weather in the prior year at Duke Energy Progress, partially offset by a decrease in fuel and capacity rates billed to retail customers at Duke Energy Florida;
a $22 million increase in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to favorable weather in the current year at Duke Energy Florida; and
a $21 million increase in other revenues primarily due to increased transmission revenues and nonregulated products and services revenues at Duke Energy Florida.
Partially offset by:
a $47 million decrease in retail rider revenues primarily related to decreased revenue requirements in the current year; and
a $14 million decrease in weather-normal retail sales volumes at Duke Energy Florida.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $226 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs, new depreciation rates associated with the prior year Duke Energy Progress North Carolina rate case and Duke Energy Florida's base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service;
a $48$414 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to higher coal and natural gas prices and changes in the generation mix, partially offset by the recovery of fuel expenses;
a $59 million increase in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to higher storm restoration costs, higher bad debt expense and higher nuclear outage and maintenance costs;
a $58 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to new depreciation rates associated with the North Carolina rate case and a higher depreciable base, partially offset by lower depreciation related to the extension of the lives of nuclear facilities; and
a $20 million increase in property and other taxes due to higher franchise and property taxes and a prior year sales and use tax refund.
47

MD&ADUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
Partially offset by:
a $201 million decrease in impairment of assets and other charges primarily due to the prior year South Carolina Supreme Court decision on coal ash.
Other Income and Expenses. The variance was driven by the coal ash insurance litigation proceeds received in the prior year, partially offset by an increase in AFUDC equity due to higher capital expenditures.
Interest Expense. The variance was driven by higher interest rates and outstanding debt balances.
Income Tax Expense.The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income.
PROGRESS ENERGY
Results of Operations
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$13,125 $11,057 $2,068 
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power5,078 3,584 1,494 
Operation, maintenance and other2,458 2,529 (71)
Depreciation and amortization2,142 1,929 213 
Property and other taxes607 542 65 
Impairment of assets and other charges12 82 (70)
Total operating expenses10,297 8,666 1,631 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net11 14 (3)
Operating Income2,839 2,405 434 
Other Income and Expenses, net181 215 (34)
Interest Expense844 794 50 
Income Before Income Taxes2,176 1,826 350 
Income Tax Expense348 227 121 
Net Income1,828 1,599 229 
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests (1)
Net Income Attributable to Parent$1,828 $1,598 $230 
Year Ended December 31, 2022, as compared to 2021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $1,481 million increase in fuel revenues driven by higher fuel prices and higher volumes;
a $249 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;
a $230 million increase in retail pricing due to the North Carolina Renewablerate case and base rate adjustments at Duke Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirementFlorida related to annual increases from the prior year2021 Settlement Agreement and the solar base rate adjustment;
an $85 million increase in rider revenues due to higher revenues from the Storm Protection Plan at Duke Energy Florida and storm securitization and energy efficiency riders at Duke Energy Progress;
a $53 million increase in wholesale revenues, net of fuel, due to higher capacity volumes; and
a $43 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather.
Partially offset by:
an $86 million decrease in capacity revenue primarily due to accelerated recovery of retired Crystal River coal units in 2021.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $1,494 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to higher demand and higher natural gas prices;
a $213 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to increased rates at Duke Energy Florida and higher amortization of deferred coal ash and storm costs at Duke Energy Progress, partially offset by lower purchased power and lower fuel costs, netthe extension of deferrals,the lives at nuclear facilities at Duke Energy Florida;Progress; and
a $32$65 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to current year property tax reassessments and a favorable sales and use tax creditan increase in the prior yeargross receipts taxes at Duke Energy ProgressFlorida and higher franchise and property taxes for additional plant in service at Duke Energy Florida.Progress.
48

MD&APROGRESS ENERGY
Partially offset by:
a $118$71 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to lowerreduced storm costs, reduced outage costs, and lower employee benefit costs, partially offset by increased vegetation management costsamortization at Duke Energy Florida; and
a $111$70 million decrease in impairment of assets and other charges primarily due to the prior year impacts associated withSouth Carolina Supreme Court decision on coal ash and optimization of the North Carolina rate case at Duke Energy Progress as well as the impairmentcompany's real estate portfolio and reduction of Duke Energy Florida's Citrus County CC.office space.
Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was drivenis primarily by AFUDC equity return ending on the Citrus County CCdue to coal ash insurance litigation proceeds received in the fourth quarter of 2018 at Duke Energy Florida, partially offset by life insurance proceedsprior year at Duke Energy Progress.
Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by AFUDChigher interest expense and outstanding debt return ending in the fourth quarter of 2018 on the Citrus County CCbalances at Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
Income Tax Expense.Expense. The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in pretax income partially offset by an increaseand a decrease in the amortization of excess deferred taxes and a Tax Act adjustment in the prior year related to excess deferred taxes.
Matters Impacting Future Results
On December 31, 2019, Duke Energy Progress entered into a settlement agreement with NCDEQ and certain community groups under which Duke Energy Progress agreed to excavate two of the three remaining coal ash basins in North Carolina with ash moved to on-site lined landfills. At the one remaining basin, uncapped basin ash will be excavated and moved to lined landfills. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of these ash basins could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Progress’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 4 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.
Duke Energy Progress filed a general rate case with the NCUC on October 30, 2019. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
On May 21, 2019, the PSCSC issued an order granting Duke Energy Progress' request for a retail rate increase but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. Duke Energy Progress filed a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court on November 15, 2019. Appellant briefs are due on March 2, 2020, and Appellee response briefs are due on May 15, 2020. Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.

51




MD&APROGRESS ENERGY


Duke Energy Progress has petitioned for deferral of future grid improvement costs in its 2019 rate case. Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid improvement costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.
During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida’s service territories were impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outages to the service territory of Duke Energy Progress. Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was also impacted by Hurricane Michael, a Category 5 hurricane and the most powerful storm to hit the Florida Panhandle in recorded history. In September 2019, Hurricane Dorian impacted Duke Energy Progress' and Duke Energy Florida's service territories. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms has been deferred. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Progress Energy's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$5,957
 $5,699
 $258
Operating Revenues$6,753 $5,780 $973 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,012
 1,892
 120
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,492 1,778 714 
Operation, maintenance and other1,446
 1,578
 (132)Operation, maintenance and other1,475 1,467 
Depreciation and amortization1,143
 991
 152
Depreciation and amortization1,187 1,097 90 
Property and other taxes176
 155
 21
Property and other taxes190 159 31 
Impairment charges12
 33
 (21)
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges7 63 (56)
Total operating expenses4,789
 4,649
 140
Total operating expenses5,351 4,564 787 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 9
 (9)Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net4 13 (9)
Operating Income1,168
 1,059
 109
Operating Income1,406 1,229 177 
Other Income and Expenses, net100
 87
 13
Other Income and Expenses, net114 143 (29)
Interest Expense306
 319
 (13)Interest Expense354 306 48 
Income Before Income Taxes962
 827
 135
Income Before Income Taxes1,166 1,066 100 
Income Tax Expense157
 160
 (3)Income Tax Expense158 75 83 
Net Income$805
 $667
 $138
Net Income$1,008 $991 $17 
The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales and average number of customers for Duke Energy Progress. The below percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2019
 2018
Residential sales(4.0)% 9.9%
General service sales(1.6)% 2.3%
Industrial sales0.6 % 0.8%
Wholesale power sales(1.5)% 4.6%
Joint dispatch sales(0.8)% 2.1%
Total sales(1.4)% 3.8%
Average number of customers1.3 % 1.5%
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2022
Residential sales(0.8)%
General service sales7.5%
Industrial sales18.1%
Wholesale power sales2.5%
Joint dispatch sales27.5%
Total sales5.4%
Average number of customers1.9%
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $110 million increase in retail pricing due to the impacts of the prior year North Carolina rate case and the current year South Carolina rate case;
a $101$699 million increase in fuel revenues primarily related to increaseddriven by higher fuel cost recoveryprices and higher volumes;
a $128 million increase due to extremehigher pricing from the North Carolina retail rate case, net of a return of EDIT to customers;
a $58 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;
a $39 million increase in rider revenues primarily due to storm securitization and energy efficiency riders, partially offset by the Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards rider;
a $27 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather incompared to the prior year; and
a $54$20 million increase in wholesale power revenues, net of fuel, primarily due to coal ash cost recovery in the current year.
Partially Offset by:
a $21 million decrease primarily due to the return of excess deferred incomes taxes created by the reduction in the corporate income tax rate, partially offset by an increase in rider revenues related to EE programs.

higher capacity volumes.
52
49




MD&ADUKE ENERGY PROGRESS


Operating Expenses. Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $152 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs and new depreciation rates associated with the prior year North Carolina and current year South Carolina rate cases, partially offset by the amortization credit for the North Carolina Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement increase from prior year;
a $120$714 million increase in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to higher natural gas prices and changes in the generation mix, partially offset by the recovery of fuel expenses and lower coal expense;
a higher deferred fuel balance and an$90 million increase in the North Carolina Renewable Energydepreciation and Energy Efficiency Portfolio Standard requirement from prior year,amortization due to higher amortization of deferred coal ash costs and amortization related to deferred storm costs, partially offset by lower demanddepreciation related to the extension of the lives of nuclear facilities; and changes in generation mix; and
a $21$31 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to current yearhigher franchise and property tax reassessmentstaxes and a favorableprior year sales and use tax credit in the prior year.refund.
Partially offset by:
a $132 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to lower storm costs in current year, reduced outage costs and lower employee benefit costs; and
a $21$56 million decrease in impairment of assets and other charges primarily due to the prior year impacts associated withSouth Carolina Supreme Court decision on coal ash and optimization of the North Carolina rate case.company's real estate portfolio and reduction of office space.
Other Income and Expenses, net.net. The variance was primarily due to coal ash insurance litigation proceeds received in the prior year.
Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by life insurance proceeds.higher outstanding debt balances.
Interest Expense.Income Tax Expense. The varianceincrease in tax expense was driven primarily by lower interest rates on outstanding debt.
Matters Impacting Future Results
On December 31, 2019, Duke Energy Progress entered intodue to an increase in pretax income and a settlement agreement with NCDEQ and certain community groups under which Duke Energy Progress agreed to excavate two of the three remaining coal ash basins in North Carolina with ash moved to on-site lined landfills. At the one remaining basin, uncapped basin ash will be excavated and moved to lined landfills. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of these ash basins could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Progress’ results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Notes 4 and 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Commitments and Contingencies,” respectively, for additional information.
Duke Energy Progress filed a general rate case with the NCUC on October 30, 2019. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
On May 21, 2019, the PSCSC issued an order granting Duke Energy Progress' request for a retail rate increase but denying recovery of certain coal ash costs. Duke Energy Progress filed a notice of appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court on November 15, 2019. Appellant briefs are due on March 2, 2020, and Appellee response briefs are due on May 15, 2020. Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if coal ash costs are not ultimately approved for recovery. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
Duke Energy Progress has petitioned for deferral of future grid improvement costs in its 2019 rate case. Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows could be adversely impacted if grid improvement costs are not ultimately approved for recovery and/or deferral treatment.
During the last half of 2018, Duke Energy Progress' service territory was impacted by several named storms. Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego caused flooding, extensive damage and widespread power outagesdecrease in the service territory. In September 2019, Hurricane Dorian reached the Carolinas bringing high winds, tornadoes and heavy rain, impacting about 300,000 customers within the service territory. A significant portionamortization of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms has been deferred. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the deferral and future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Progress' results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.excess deferred taxes.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.

53




MD&ADUKE ENERGY FLORIDA


DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$5,231
 $5,021
 $210
Operating Revenues$6,353 $5,259 $1,094 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,012
 2,085
 (73)Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,586 1,806 780 
Operation, maintenance and other1,034
 1,025
 9
Operation, maintenance and other967 1,048 (81)
Depreciation and amortization702
 628
 74
Depreciation and amortization955 831 124 
Property and other taxes392
 374
 18
Property and other taxes421 383 38 
Impairment charges(36) 54
 (90)
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges4 19 (15)
Total operating expenses4,104
 4,166
 (62)Total operating expenses4,933 4,087 846 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 1
 (1)Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net2 
Operating Income1,127
 856
 271
Operating Income1,422 1,173 249 
Other Income and Expenses, net48
 86
 (38)Other Income and Expenses, net74 71 
Interest Expense328
 287
 41
Interest Expense362 319 43 
Income Before Income Taxes847
 655
 192
Income Before Income Taxes1,134 925 209 
Income Tax Expense155
 101
 54
Income Tax Expense225 187 38 
Net Income$692
 $554
 $138
Net Income$909 $738 $171 
The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales and average number of customers for Duke Energy Florida. The below percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Wholesale power sales include both billed and unbilled sales. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2019
 2018
Residential sales0.7 % 4.3 %
General service sales0.3 % 1.9 %
Industrial sales(4.6)% (0.4)%
Wholesale power sales28.8 % 5.2 %
Total sales1.5 % 2.4 %
Average number of customers1.6 % 1.5 %
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2022
Residential sales1.5%
General service sales3.5%
Industrial sales6.6%
Wholesale power sales38.7%
Total sales8.9%
Average number of customers1.7%
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $256$782 million increase in fuel revenues driven by higher fuel prices and higher volumes;
a $191 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes;
a $102 million increase in retail pricing due to base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placed in service, annual increases from the 20172021 Settlement Agreementagreement and the Solar Base Rate Adjustment;solar base rate adjustment;
50

MD&ADUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
a $22$46 million increase in retail sales, net of fuel revenues, due to favorable weather in the current year;
a $21 million increase in otherrider revenues primarily due to increased transmission revenuesStorm Protection Plan rider revenue driven by higher debt and nonregulated products and services revenues; andequity returns from increased capital expenditures in the current year;
a $16$33 million increase in wholesale power revenues, net of fuel, primarily due to increased demand.higher capacity revenues and bulk power sales; and
a $16 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather in the current year.
Partially offset by:
a $59an $86 million decrease in fuel and capacity revenuesrevenue primarily due to a decreaseaccelerated recovery of the retired coal units Crystal River 1 and 2 in fuel and capacity rates billed to retail customers;
a $33 million decrease in retail rider revenues primarily related to decreased revenue requirements in the current year; and
a $14 million decrease in weather-normal retail sales volumes.

54




MD&ADUKE ENERGY FLORIDA


2021.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $90$780 million decrease in impairment charges primarily due to a prior year impairment at Citrus County CC and a reduction of the impairment in the current year; and
a $73 million decreaseincrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to lower purchased power and lower fuel costs, net of deferrals.higher natural gas prices;
Partially offset by:
a $74$124 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense primarily due to base rate adjustments related to Citrus County CC being placedan increase in service, other additional plantdepreciation rates starting in serviceJanuary 2022; and increases resulting from the 2018 Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear decommissioning cost study;
an $18a $38 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to an increase in gross receipt taxes driven by higher property taxes from additional plant in service; andrevenues.
a $9Partially offset by:
an $81 million increasedecrease in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to increasedreduced storm amortization and reduced vegetation management costs and deregulation initiative costs, partially offset by lower severance charges.higher bad debt expense; and
Other Incomea $15 million decrease in impairment of assets and Expenses, net. other charges due to the prior year optimization of the company's real estate portfolio and reduction of office space.
Interest Expense.The variance was driven primarily by AFUDC equity return ending on the Citrus County CC in the fourth quarter of 2018.
Interest Expense. The variance was driven primarily by AFUDChigher interest rates and outstanding debt return ending on the Citrus County CC in the fourth quarter of 2018 and higher debt outstanding in the current year.balances.
Income Tax Expense.The increase in tax expense was primarily due to an increase inhigher pretax income in the current year.income.
Matters Impacting Future ResultsDUKE ENERGY OHIO
On October 10, 2018, Hurricane Michael made landfall on Florida's Panhandle as a Category 5 hurricane, the most powerful storm to hit the Florida Panhandle in recorded history. The storm caused significant damage within the service territoryResults of Duke Energy Florida, particularly from Panama City Beach to Mexico Beach. In September 2019, Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was threatened by Hurricane Dorian with landfall as a possible Category 5 hurricane and therefore Duke Energy Florida incurred costs to secure necessary resources to be prepared for that potential impact. A significant portion of the incremental operation and maintenance expenses related to these storms has been deferred. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing the future recovery of storm restoration costs could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Florida's financial position, results of operations and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.Operations
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues
Regulated electric$1,798 $1,493 $305 
Regulated natural gas716 544 172 
Total operating revenues2,514 2,037 477 
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power657 409 248 
Cost of natural gas 261 136 125 
Operation, maintenance and other523 479 44 
Depreciation and amortization324 307 17 
Property and other taxes369 355 14 
Impairment of assets and other charges(10)25 (35)
Total operating expenses2,124 1,711 413 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net1 — 
Operating Income391 327 64 
Other Income and Expenses, net19 18 
Interest Expense129 111 18 
Income Before Income Taxes281 234 47 
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense(21)30 (51)
Net Income$302 $204 $98 
55
51




MD&ADUKE ENERGY OHIO


DUKE ENERGY OHIO
Results of Operations
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
2018
Variance
Operating Revenues  

Regulated electric$1,456
$1,450
$6
Regulated natural gas484
506
(22)
Nonregulated electric and other
1
(1)
Total operating revenues1,940
1,957
(17)
Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – regulated388
412
(24)
Cost of natural gas 95
113
(18)
Operation, maintenance and other520
480
40
Depreciation and amortization265
268
(3)
Property and other taxes308
290
18
Total operating expenses1,576
1,563
13
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
(106)106
Operating Income364
288
76
Other Income and Expenses, net24
23
1
Interest Expense109
92
17
Income from Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes279
219
60
Income Tax Expense from Continuing Operations40
43
(3)
Income from Continuing Operations239
176
63
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax(1)
(1)
Net Income$238
$176
$62
The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales of electricity, MCF of natural gas delivered and average number of electric and natural gas customers for Duke Energy Ohio. The below percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.
Electric Natural GasElectricNatural Gas
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2019
 2018
 2019
 2018
Increase (Decrease) over prior year20222022
Residential sales(3.9)% 12.2 % (3.7)% 18.0%Residential sales(0.5)%13.7 %
General service sales(1.9)% 3.3 % (1.2)% 15.4%General service sales(2.1)%1.3 %
Industrial sales(2.1)% 1.0 % (0.4)% 8.1%Industrial sales(6.8)%0.7 %
Wholesale electric power sales(4.9)% (46.6)% n/a
 n/a
Wholesale electric power sales(11.0)%n/a
Other natural gas salesn/a
 n/a
 0.7 % 0.7%Other natural gas salesn/a(3.6)%
Total sales(2.4)% 2.8 % (1.7)% 11.9%Total sales0.6 %4.9 %
Average number of customers0.7 % 0.8 % 0.7 % 0.9%Average number of customers1.3 %0.6 %
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $45$372 million decreaseincrease in fuel related revenues primarily due to higher retail sales volumes and higher fuel rates in the current year in response to an increase in natural gas prices and purchased power expense;
a decrease$55 million increase in price;retail revenue riders primarily due to the Ohio CEP and Distribution Capital Investment Rider (DCI);
a $31$39 million decreaseincrease in riderother electric revenues primarily due to the cessation of the Smart Grid RiderDistribution Decoupling rider adjustments recorded in 20182021;
a $10 million increase in bulk power marketing sales; and the Tax Cut and Jobs Act Rider beginning in 2019, partially offset by new riders implemented in conjunction with rate cases including the Price Stabilization Rider, Electric Service Reliability Rider and the Environmental Surcharge Mechanism;
a $15$10 million decrease in FTR rider revenues; and
a $12 million decrease in electric and natural gas retail sales, net of fuel revenues,increase due to unfavorablefavorable weather in the current year.
Partially offset by:
a $71$15 million increase in retail pricing primarilydecrease due to rate case impacts; and
an $18 million increase in PJM point-to-point transmission revenues due to an increase in the Network Integration Transmission Service rate primarily due to additional plant in service.

56




MD&ADUKE ENERGY OHIO


MGP Settlement.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $40$373 million increase in operations,fuel expense primarily driven by higher retail prices and increased volumes for natural gas and purchased power;
a $44 million increase in operation, maintenance and other expense primarily due to the FERC approved settlement refundMGP Settlement, partially offset by employee related costs;
a $17 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily driven by increases in distribution plant in service and lower CEP deferrals, partially offset by rate case adjustments for the over amortization of certain transmission costs previously billed by PJM recordedmeter assets in 20182022; and increased PJM transmission expansion fees; and
an $18a $14 million increase in property and other taxes primarily due to additional plant in service, partially offset byhigher property taxes, higher kilowatt and natural gas distribution taxes and a negotiated reassessment of property values and propertylower Network Integration Transmission Services tax true ups for prior periods.deferral.
Partially offset by:
a $24$35 million decrease in fuel used in electric generationimpairment of assets and purchased power expenseother charges primarily due to the prior year outage at East Bend Stationimpairments related to the propane caverns in Ohio and the deferraloptimization of OVEC related purchased power costs;the company's real estate portfolio and
an $18 million decrease reduction of office space, partially offset by the partial reversal of the propane cavern impairment in the cost of natural gas primarily due to lower costs passed through to customers, as a result of a lower natural gas prices.
Losses on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net. The increase was driven by the loss on the prior year sale of Beckjord.current year.
Interest Expense.The variance was primarily due to higher interest rates, outstanding debt outstandingbalances and post in-service carrying costs, partially offset by AFUDC debt.
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense. The decrease in tax expense was primarily due to an increase in the current year.amortization of excess deferred taxes related to the MGP Settlement.

52
57




MD&ADUKE ENERGY OHIOINDIANA


Matters Impacting Future Results
On November 13, 2013, the PUCO issued an order authorizing recovery of MGP costs at certain sites in Ohio with a deadline to complete the MGP environmental investigation and remediation work prior to December 31, 2016. This deadline was subsequently extended to December 31, 2019. Duke Energy Ohio has filed a request for extension of the deadline. A hearing on that request has not been scheduled. Disallowance of costs incurred, failure to complete the work by the deadline or failure to obtain an extension from the PUCO could result in an adverse impact on Duke Energy Ohio’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” for additional information.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
Results of Operations
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$3,922 $3,174 $748 
Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power1,819 985 834 
Operation, maintenance and other729 750 (21)
Depreciation and amortization645 615 30 
Property and other taxes75 73 
Impairment of assets and other charges388 379 
Total operating expenses3,656 2,432 1,224 
Operating Income266 742 (476)
Other Income and Expenses, net36 42 (6)
Interest Expense189 196 (7)
Income Before Income Taxes113 588 (475)
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense(24)107 (131)
Net Income $137 $481 $(344)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
2018
Variance
Operating Revenues$3,004
$3,059
$(55)
Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power935
1,000
(65)
Operation, maintenance and other790
788
2
Depreciation and amortization525
520
5
Property and other taxes69
78
(9)
Impairment charges
30
(30)
Total operating expenses2,319
2,416
(97)
Operating Income685
643
42
Other Income and Expenses, net41
45
(4)
Interest Expense156
167
(11)
Income Before Income Taxes570
521
49
Income Tax Expense134
128
6
Net Income $436
$393
$43
The following table shows the percent changes in GWh sales and average number of customers for Duke Energy Indiana. The below percentages for retail customer classes represent billed sales only. Total sales includes billed and unbilled retail sales and wholesale sales to incorporated municipalities, public and private utilities and power marketers. Amounts are not weather-normalized.
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2019
 2018
Residential sales(3.9)% 12.5 %
General service sales(2.2)% 2.8 %
Industrial sales(2.6)% 0.5 %
Wholesale power sales(27.7)% (0.9)%
Total sales(6.8)% 3.3 %
Average number of customers1.2 % 1.3 %
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2022
Residential sales(0.4)%
General service sales1.8%
Industrial sales(12.1)%
Wholesale power sales5.4%
Total sales1.9%
Average number of customers1.4%
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $700 million increase in retail fuel revenues primarily due to higher fuel cost recovery driven by higher retail sales volumes and fuel prices;
a $74 million increase primarily due to wholesale revenues, including fuel revenues, driven by higher rates and the bulk power marketing sharing provision;
a $46 million increase in weather-normal retail sales volumes primarily due to higher nonresidential customer demand; and
a $20 million increase in retail sales due to favorable weather.
Partially offset by:
a $67 million decrease due to the Indiana Supreme Court ruling on recovery of certain coal ash costs;
a $13 million decrease primarily due to the Utility Receipts Tax repeal; and
a $12 million decrease primarily due to fixed bill plans and other electric revenues.
Operating Revenues.Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $21an $834 million decrease in wholesale power revenues primarily due to the expiration of a contract with a wholesale customer;
a $16 million decrease in other transmission FTR revenues due to lower congestion; and
a $14 million decrease in weather-normal retail sales volume.
Operating Expenses.The variance was driven primarily by:
a $65 million decreaseincrease in fuel used in electric generation and purchased power primarily due to higher purchased power expense and higher natural gas and coal costs;
a $379 million increase in impairment of assets and other charges primarily due to the Indiana court rulings on recovery of certain coal ash costs; and
a $30 million increase in depreciation and amortization primarily due to additional plant in service, Step 2 rates true-up adjustment to depreciation expense and coal ash depreciation.
Partially offset by:
a $21 million decrease in operation, maintenance and other primarily due to lower coaloutage, base maintenance work and natural gas costs, partially offset by higher purchase power fuel clause, higher amortization of deferred fuel costs and higher deferred MISO charges; and
a $30 million decrease in impairments primarily due to the prior year Edwardsport IGCC settlement agreement.

employee related costs.
58
53




MD&ADUKE ENERGY INDIANA


Matters Impacting Future Results
On April 17, 2015, the EPA publishedIncome Tax (Benefit) Expense. The decrease in tax expense was primarily due to a decrease in pretax income and an increase in the Federal Register a rule to regulate the disposalamortization of CCR from electric utilities as solid waste. Duke Energy Indiana has interpreted the rule to identify the coal ash basin sites impacted and has assessed the amounts of coal ash subject to the rule and a method of compliance. Duke Energy Indiana's interpretation of the requirements of the CCR rule is subject to potential legal challenges and further regulatory approvals, which could result in additional ash basin closure requirements, higher costs of compliance and greater AROs. Additionally, Duke Energy Indiana has retired facilities that are not subject to the CCR rule. Duke Energy Indiana may incur costs at these facilities to comply with environmental regulations or to mitigate risks associated with on-site storage of coal ash. An order from regulatory authorities disallowing recovery of costs related to closure of ash basins could have an adverse impact on Duke Energy Indiana's results of operations, financial position and cash flows.excess deferred income taxes.
Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC on July 2, 2019, its first general rate case in Indiana in 16 years. The outcome of this rate case could materially impact Duke Energy Indiana's results of operations, financial position and cash flows. See Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for additional information.
Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
PIEDMONT
Results of Operations
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Operating Revenues$2,124 $1,569 $555 
Operating Expenses
Cost of natural gas1,015 569 446 
Operation, maintenance and other368 327 41 
Depreciation and amortization222 213 
Property and other taxes57 55 
Impairment of assets and other charges18 10 
Total operating expenses1,680 1,174 506 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net4 — 
Operating Income448 395 53 
Other Income and Expenses, net54 64 (10)
Interest Expense140 119 21 
Income Before Income Taxes362 340 22 
Income Tax Expense39 30 
Net Income$323 $310 $13 
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
Operating Revenues$1,381
 $1,375
 $6
Operating Expenses     
Cost of natural gas532
 584
 (52)
Operation, maintenance and other328
 357
 (29)
Depreciation and amortization172
 159
 13
Property and other taxes45
 49
 (4)
Total operating expenses1,077
 1,149
 (72)
Operating Income304
 226
 78
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates8
 7
 1
Other income and expenses, net20
 14
 6
Total other income and expenses28
 21
 7
Interest Expense87
 81
 6
Income Before Income Taxes245
 166
 79
Income Tax Expense43
 37
 6
Net Income$202
 $129
 $73
The following table shows the percent changes in Dth delivered and average number of customers. The percentages for all throughput deliveries represent billed and unbilled sales. Amounts are not weather-normalized.
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2019
2018
Residential deliveries(8.0)%23.6 %
Commercial deliveries(4.6)%14.9 %
Industrial deliveries1.7 %4.2 %
Power generation deliveries(11.8)%23.6 %
For resale4.8 %17.0 %
Total throughput deliveries(8.2)%19.0 %
Secondary market volumes(0.5)%(8.1)%
Average number of customers1.4 %1.6 %
Increase (Decrease) over prior year2022
Residential deliveries5.0 %
Commercial deliveries8.5 %
Industrial deliveries1.2 %
Power generation deliveries23.3 %
For resale(4.3)%
Total throughput deliveries15.7 %
Secondary market volumes18.9 %
Average number of customers1.4 %
Piedmont's throughput was 511,243,774 Dth and 557,145,128 Dth for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Due to the margin decoupling mechanism in North Carolina, WNA mechanisms in South Carolina and Tennessee and fixed price contracts with most power generation customers, changes in throughput deliveries do not have a material impact on Piedmont's revenues or earnings. The margin decoupling mechanism adjusts for variations in residential and commercial use per customer, including those due to weather and conservation. The WNAweather normalization adjustment mechanisms mostly offset the impact of weather on bills rendered, but do not ensure full recovery of approved margin during periods when winter weather is significantly warmer or colder than normal.
Year Ended December 31, 2019,2022, as compared to 20182021
Operating Revenues. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $24$257 million increase due to North Carolina base rate case increases;
a $19 million increase due to North Carolina and Tennessee IMR increases; and

59




MD&APIEDMONT


an $11 million increase due to NCUC approval related to tax reform accounting from fixed rate contracts.
Partially offset by:
a $52 million decrease due to lowerhigher natural gas costs passed through to customers.customers and higher volumes;
a $213 million increase due to increased secondary marketing activity including higher off-system sales natural gas costs; and
a $64 million increase due to base rate increases.
Operating Expenses. The variance was driven primarily by:
a $52$257 million decreaseincrease in cost of natural gas due to lowerhigher natural gas prices;costs passed through to customers and higher volumes;
a $29$189 million decreaseincrease in cost of natural gas due to increased secondary marketing activity including higher off-system sales higher natural gas costs; and
a $41 million increase in operation, maintenance and other expense due to lower information technology outside serviceshigher spend on internal and contract labor costs.costs, locates, fleet, materials and other.
Partially offset by:Other Income and Expenses, net. The variance was driven primarily by a decrease in AFUDC equity base.
a $13 millionInterest Expense. The variance was primarily due to higher debt outstanding and interest rates.
Income Tax Expense. The increase in depreciation and amortizationtax expense was primarily due to additional plantan increase in service.pretax income and a decrease in the amortization of excess deferred taxes.
54
Matters Impacting Future Results

Within this Item 7, see Liquidity and Capital Resources for discussion of risks associated with the Tax Act.
MD&ACRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Preparation of financial statements requires the application of accounting policies, judgments, assumptions and estimates that can significantly affect the reported results of operations, cash flows or the amounts of assets and liabilities recognized in the financial statements. Judgments made include the likelihood of success of particular projects, possible legal and regulatory challenges, earnings assumptions on pension and other benefit fund investments and anticipated recovery of costs, especially through regulated operations. 
Management discusses these policies, estimates and assumptions with senior members of management on a regular basis and provides periodic updates on management decisions to the Audit Committee. Management believes the areas described below require significant judgment in the application of accounting policy or in making estimates and assumptions that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods.
For further information, see Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Summary of Significant Accounting Policies."
Regulated Operations Accounting
Substantially all of Duke Energy’s regulated operations meet the criteria for application of regulated operations accounting treatment. As a result, Duke Energy is required to record assets and liabilities that would not be recorded for nonregulated entities. Regulatory assets generally represent incurred costs that have been deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. Regulatory liabilities are recorded when it is probable that a regulator will require Duke Energy to make refunds to customers or reduce rates to customers for previous collections or deferred revenue for costs that have yet to be incurred.
Management continually assesses whether recorded regulatory assets are probable of future recovery by considering factors such as:
applicable regulatory environment changes;
historical regulatory treatment for similar costs in Duke Energy’s jurisdictions;
litigation of rate orders;
recent rate orders to other regulated entities;
levels of actual return on equity compared to approved rates of return on equity; and
the status of any pending or potential deregulation legislation.
If future recovery of costs ceases to be probable, asset write-offs would be recognized in operating income. Additionally, regulatory agencies can provide flexibility in the manner and timing of the depreciation of property, plant and equipment, recognition of asset retirement costs and amortization of regulatory assets, or may disallow recovery of all or a portion of certain assets.
As required by regulated operations accounting rules, significant judgment can be required to determine if an otherwise recognizable incurred cost qualifies to be deferred for future recovery as a regulatory asset. Significant judgment can also be required to determine if revenues previously recognized are for entity specific costs that are no longer expected to be incurred or have not yet been incurred and are therefore a regulatory liability.
For further information, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters."
Goodwill Impairment Assessments
Duke Energy performed its annual goodwill impairment tests for all reporting units as of August 31, 2019.2022. Additionally, Duke Energy monitors all relevant events and circumstances during the year to determine if an interim impairment test is required. Such events and circumstances include an adverse regulatory outcome, declining financial performance and deterioration of industry or market conditions. As of August 31, 2019,2022, all of the reporting units' estimated fair value of equity substantially exceeded the carrying value of equity. The fair values of the reporting units were calculated using a weighted combination of the income approach, which estimates fair value based on discounted cash flows, and the market approach, which estimates fair value based on market comparables within the utility and energy industries.

60




MD&ACRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES


Estimated future cash flows under the income approach are based on Duke Energy’s internal business plan. Significant assumptions used are growth rates, future rates of return expected to result from ongoing rate regulation and discount rates. Management determines the appropriate discount rate for each of its reporting units based on the WACCWeighted Average Cost of Capital (WACC) for each individual reporting unit. The WACC takes into account both the after-tax cost of debt and cost of equity. A major component of the cost of equity is the current risk-free rate on 20-year U.S. Treasury bonds. In the 20192022 impairment tests, Duke Energy considered implied WACCs for certain peer companies in determining the appropriate WACC rates to use in its analysis. As each reporting unit has a different risk profile based on the nature of its operations, including factors such as regulation, the WACC for each reporting unit may differ. Accordingly, the WACCs were adjusted, as appropriate, to account for company specific risk premiums. The discount rates used for calculating the fair values as of August 31, 2019,2022, for each of Duke Energy’s reporting units ranged from 5.2%6.6% to 5.9%6.9%. The underlying assumptions and estimates are made as of a point in time. Subsequent changes, particularly changes in the discount rates, authorized regulated rates of return or growth rates inherent in management’s estimates of future cash flows, could result in future impairment charges.
One of the most significant assumptions utilized in determining the fair value of reporting units under the market approach is implied market multiples for certain peer companies. Management selects comparable peers based on each peer’s primary business mix, operations, and market capitalization compared to the applicable reporting unit and calculates implied market multiples based on available projected earnings guidance and peer company market values as of August 31. The implied market multiples used for calculating the fair values as of August 31, 2022, for each of Duke Energy's reporting units ranged from 10.3 to 13.6.
55

MD&ACRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
Duke Energy primarily operates in environments that are rate-regulated. In such environments, revenue requirements are adjusted periodically by regulators based on factors including levels of costs, sales volumes and costs of capital. Accordingly, Duke Energy’s regulated utilities operate to some degree with a buffer from the direct effects, positive or negative, of significant swings in market or economic conditions. However, significant changes in discount rates or implied market multiples over a prolonged period may have a material impact on the fair value of equity.
Duke Energy has $19.3 billion in Goodwill at both December 31, 2022, and 2021. For further information, see Note 12 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Goodwill and Intangible Assets."
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are recognized for legal obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment at the present value of the projected liability in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. Duke Energy has $12.7 billion and $12.6 billion of AROs as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. See Note 10, "Asset Retirement Obligations," for further details including a rollforward of related liabilities.
The present value of the initial obligation and subsequent updates are based on discounted cash flows, which include estimates regarding the amount and timing of future cash flows, regulatory, legal, and legislative decisions, selection of discount rates and cost escalation rates, among other factors. These estimates are subject to change.
Obligations for nuclear decommissioning are based on site-specific cost studies. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress assume prompt dismantlement of the nuclear facilities after operations are ceased. During 2019,2020, Duke Energy Florida, entered intoclosed an agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of the Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear power station. Closing of this agreement is contingent uponstation after receiving approval offrom the NRC and FPSC. The retirement obligations for the decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear power station are measured using probability weightings of an obligation based on accelerated decommissioning from 2020 continuing through 2027 and an obligation based on the unit in SAFSTOR, with decommissioning beginning in 2067 and ending in 2074.2027. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also assume that spent fuel will be stored on-site until such time that it can be transferred to a yet to be built DOE facility.
Obligations for closure of ash basins are based upon discounted cash flows of estimated costs for site-specific plans. During 2019, Duke Energy reached a settlement agreement with the NCDEQ and SELC to excavate 7 and partially excavate 2 of the remainingIn prior years, certain ash basins in Duke Energy Carolinashave had probability weightings applied to them based on different potential closure methods and Duke Energy Progress service territories. In 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress remeasured their obligations to reflect the results of the settlement.probabilities surrounding pending legal changes.
For further information, see Notes 4, 5 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," "Commitments and Contingencies" and "Asset Retirement Obligations."
Long-Lived Asset Impairment Assessments, Excluding RegulatedDiscontinued Operations
Duke Energy evaluates property, plant and equipment forcalculated an estimated impairment when events or changes in circumstances (suchon the disposition of its Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups as a significant change in cash flow projections or the determination that it is more likely than not that an asset or asset group will be sold) indicateof December 31, 2022. The impairment was recorded to write-down the carrying amount to fair value, of such assets may not be recoverable.less cost to sell. The determination of whether an impairment has occurred is based on an estimate of undiscountedfair value was primarily determined from the income approach using discounted cash flows, but also considered market information obtained through the bidding process. Estimated future cash flows attributable tounder the assets, as comparedincome approach were based on Duke Energy's forecast, which was informed by existing power purchase agreements with their carrying value.offtakers and forward merchant curves. Significant assumptions used in the income approach include forward merchant curves and discount rates. The discount rates take into account both the after-tax cost of debt and cost of equity.
Performing an impairment evaluation involves a significant degree of estimationThe actual loss will be recorded based on final sales agreements and judgment in areas such as identifying circumstances that indicate an impairment may exist, identifying and grouping affected assets and developing the undiscounted future cash flows. If an impairment has occurred, the amount of the impairment recognized is determined by estimating the fair value and recording a loss if the carrying value is greatercould be materially different than the fair value. Additionally, determining fair value requires probability weighting future cash flows to reflect expectations about possible variations in their amounts or timing and the selection of an appropriate discount rate. Although cash flow estimates are based on relevant information available at the time the estimates are made, estimates of future cash flows are, by nature, highly uncertain and may vary significantly from actual results.
When determining whether an asset or asset group has been impaired, management groups assets at the lowest level that has discrete cash flows.
During 2019, Duke Energy sold a minority interest in a portion of certain Commercial Renewable assets. Following the sale, Duke Energy evaluated recoverability of the assets included in the sale as the fair value of consideration received for the portfolio was less than the carrying value of the assets. It was determined the assets were all recoverable. Additionally, Duke Energy evaluated recoverability of certain renewable merchant plants during 2019 due to declining market pricing and declining long-term forecasted energy prices. It was determined the assets were all recoverable as the carrying value of the assets approximated the aggregate estimated future cash flows.

61




MD&ACRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES


loss.
For further information, see Notes 3 and 11See Note 2 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Business Segments" and "Property, Plant and Equipment."Dispositions."
Equity Method Investments
Equity method investments are assessed for impairment when conditions exist that indicate that the fair value of the investment is less than book value. If the decline in value is considered to be other-than-temporary, an impairment charge is recorded and the investment is written down to its estimated fair value, which establishes a new cost basis in the investment.
Events or changes in circumstances are monitored that may indicate, in management’s judgment, the carrying value of such investments may have experienced an other-than-temporary decline in value. The fair value of equity method investments is generally estimated using an income approach where significant judgments and assumptions include expected future cash flows, the appropriate discount rate, and probability weighted-scenarios, if applicable. In certain instances, a market approach may also be used to estimate the fair value of the equity method investment.
Events or changes in circumstances that may be indicative of an other-than-temporary decline in value will vary by investment, but may include:
Significant delays in or failure to complete significant growth projects of investees;
Adverse regulatory actions expected to substantially reduce the investee’s product demand or profitability;
Expected financial performance significantly worse than anticipated when initially invested;
Prolonged period the fair value is below carrying value;
A significant or sustained decline in the market value of an investee;
Lower than expected cash distributions from investees;
Significant asset impairments or operating losses recognized by investees; and
Loss of significant customers or suppliers with no immediate prospects for replacement.
ACP
As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the equity method investment in ACP is $1.2 billion, and Duke Energy's maximum exposure to loss for its guarantee of the ACP revolving credit facility is $827 million. During 2018 and 2019, ACP received several adverse court rulings as described in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters." As a result, Duke Energy evaluated this investment for impairment and determined that fair value approximated carrying value and therefore no impairment was necessary.
Duke Energy estimated the fair value of its investment in ACP using an income approach that primarily considered probability-weighted scenarios of discounted future net cash flows based on the most recent estimate of total construction costs and revenues. These scenarios included assumptions of various court decisions and the impact those decisions may have on the timing and extent of investment, including scenarios assuming the full resolution of permitting issues in addition to a scenario where the project does not proceed. Certain scenarios within the analysis included growth expectations from additional compression or other expansion opportunities and reopeners for pricing. An after-tax discount rate of 5.9% was used in the analysis. The discount rate was derived using a market participant approach with an adjusted risk premium for the underlying investment. Higher probabilities were generally assigned to those scenarios where court approvals were received and the project moves forward reflecting interim rates at prices subject to the reopeners. A low probability was assigned to the scenario where the project does not proceed.
Judgments and assumptions are inherent in our estimates of future cash flows, discount rates, growth assumptions, and the likelihood of various scenarios. It is reasonably possible that future unfavorable developments, such as a reduced likelihood of success with court approvals, increased estimates of construction costs, material increases in the discount rate, important feedback on customer price increases or further significant delays, could result in a future impairment.
For further information on ACP, see Notes 4 and 13 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates".
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefits
The calculation of pension expense, other post-retirement benefit expense and net pension and other post-retirement assets or liabilities require the use of assumptions and election of permissible accounting alternatives. Changes in assumptions can result in different expense and reported asset or liability amounts and future actual experience can differ from the assumptions. Duke Energy believes the most critical assumptions for pension and other post-retirement benefits are:
the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets;
the assumed discount rate applied to future projected benefit payments; and
the heath care cost trend rate.

Duke Energy elects to amortize net actuarial gain or loss amounts that are in excess of 10% of the greater of the market-related value of plan assets or the plan's projected benefit obligation, into net pension or other post-retirement benefit expense over the average remaining service period of active participants expected to benefit under the plan. If all or almost all of a plan's participants are inactive, the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants is used instead of average remaining service period. Prior service cost or credit, which represents an increase or decrease in a plan's pension benefit obligation resulting from plan amendment, is amortized on a straight-line basis over the average expected remaining service period of active participants expected to benefit under the plan. If all or almost all of a plan's participants are inactive, the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants is used instead of average remaining service period.

62




MD&ACRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES


As of December 31, 2019, Duke Energy assumes pension and other post-retirement plan assets will generate a long-term rate of return of 6.85%. The expected long-term rate of return was developed using a weighted average calculation of expected returns based primarily on future expected returns across asset classes considering the use of active asset managers, where applicable. The asset allocation targets were set after considering the investment objective and the risk profile. Equity securities are held for their higher expected returns. Debt securities are primarily held to hedge the qualified pension liability. Real assets, return-seeking fixed income, hedge funds and other global securities are held for diversification. Investments within asset classes are diversified to achieve broad market participation and reduce the impact of individual managers on investments. 
Duke Energy discounted its future U.S. pension and other post-retirement obligations using a rate of 3.3% as of December 31, 2019. Discount rates used to measure benefit plan obligations for financial reporting purposes reflect rates at which pension benefits could be effectively settled. As of December 31, 2019, Duke Energy determined its discount rate for U.S. pension and other post-retirement obligations using a bond selection-settlement portfolio approach. This approach develops a discount rate by selecting a portfolio of high quality corporate bonds that generate sufficient cash flow to provide for projected benefit payments of the plan. The selected bond portfolio is derived from a universe of non-callable corporate bonds rated Aa quality or higher. After the bond portfolio is selected, a single interest rate is determined that equates the present value of the plan’s projected benefit payments discounted at this rate with the market value of the bonds selected.
Future changes in plan asset returns, assumed discount rates and various other factors related to the participants in Duke Energy’s pension and post-retirement plans will impact future pension expense and liabilities. Duke Energy cannot predict with certainty what these factors will be in the future. The following table presents the approximate effect on Duke Energy’s 2019 pretax pension expense, pretax other post-retirement expense, pension obligation and other post-retirement benefit obligation if a 0.25% change in rates were to occur.
 Qualified and Non- Other Post-Retirement
 Qualified Pension Plans Plans
(in millions)0.25% (0.25)% 0.25% (0.25)%
Effect on 2019 pretax pension and other post-retirement expense       
Expected long-term rate of return$(21) $21
 $(1) $1
Discount rate(9) 9
 
 (1)
Effect on pension and other post-retirement benefit obligation at December 31, 2019 
  
  
  
Discount rate(197) 201
 (14) 14
Duke Energy’s other post-retirement plan uses a health care cost trend rate covering both pre- and post-age 65 retired plan participants, which is comprised of a medical care cost trend rate, which reflects the near- and long-term expectation of increases in medical costs, and a prescription drug cost trend rate, which reflects the near- and long-term expectation of increases in prescription drug costs. As of December 31, 2019, the health care cost trend rate was 6.0%, trending down to 4.75% by 2026. These plans are closed to new employees.
For further information, see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Employee Benefit Plans.”

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Sources and Uses of Cash
Duke Energy relies primarily upon cash flows from operations, debt and equity issuances and its existing cash and cash equivalents to fund its liquidity and capital requirements. Duke Energy’s capital requirements arise primarily from capital and investment expenditures, repaying long-term debt and paying dividends to shareholders.
Among other provisions, the Tax Act lowered the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21% and eliminated bonus depreciation for regulated utilities. For Duke Energy’s regulated operations, the reduction in federal income taxes will result in lower regulated customer rates. However, Additionally, due to its existing NOL positiontax attributes and otherprojected tax credits to be generated relating to the IRA, Duke Energy does not expect to be a significant federal cash tax payer through at least 2027. As a result, any reductiontaxpayer until around 2030.
56

MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Capital Expenditures
Duke Energy continues to focus on reducing risk and positioning its business for future success and will invest principally in customer rates could cause a material reduction in consolidated cash flows from operationsits strongest business sectors. Duke Energy’s projected capital and investment expenditures, including AFUDC debt and capitalized interest, for the next three fiscal years are included in the short term. Over time, the reductiontable below.
(in millions)202320242025
Electric Generation(a)
$1,650 $1,950 $3,150 
Electric Transmission1,550 1,925 1,850 
Electric Distribution3,750 3,750 4,100 
Environmental and Other675 500 475 
EU&I Growth Capital7,625 8,125 9,575 
Maintenance2,800 2,625 2,425 
Total EU&I10,425 10,750 12,000 
GU&I1,375 1,150 975 
Other400 375 425 
Total projected capital and investment expenditures$12,200 $12,275 $13,400 
(a)    Includes nuclear fuel of approximately $1.9 billion in deferred tax liabilities resulting from the Tax Act will increase Duke Energy’s regulated rate base investments and customer rates. Impacts of Tax Act to Duke Energy’s cash flows and credit metrics are subject to the regulatory actions of its state commissions, of which a substantial amount remain uncertain through ongoing rate case activity,2023-2025.
Debt
Long-term debt maturities and the FERC.interest payable on long-term debt each represent a significant cash requirement for the Duke Energy Registrants. See Note 47 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,“Debt and Credit Facilities,” for information regarding the Duke Energy Registrants' long-term debt at December 31, 2022, the weighted average interest rate applicable to each long-term debt category and a schedule of long-term debt maturities over the next five years.
Fuel and Purchased Power
Fuel and purchased power includes firm capacity payments that provide Duke Energy with uninterrupted firm access to electricity transmission capacity and natural gas transportation contracts, as well as undesignated contracts and contracts that qualify as NPNS. Duke Energy’s contractual cash obligations for fuel and purchased power as of December 31, 2022, are as follows:
Payments Due by Period
(in millions)TotalLess than 1 year (2023)2-3 years (2024 & 2025)4-5 years (2026 & 2027)More than 5 years (2028 & beyond)
Fuel and purchased power$23,255 $5,840 $7,277 $3,674 $6,464 
Other Purchase Obligations
Other purchase obligations includes contracts for software, telephone, data and consulting or advisory services, contractual obligations for Engineering, Procurement, and Construction agreement costs for new generation plants, solar facilities, plant refurbishments, maintenance and day-to-day contract work and commitments to buy certain products. Amount excludes certain open purchase orders for services that are provided on demand for which the timing of the purchase cannot be determined. Total cash commitments for related other purchase obligation expenditures are $12,095 million, with $11,118 million expected to be paid in the next 12 months.
See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Leases” for a schedule of both finance lease and operating lease payments over the next five years. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Asset Retirement Obligations” for information on nuclear decommissioning trust funding obligations and the closure of ash impoundments.
Duke Energy performs ongoing assessments of its respective guarantee obligations to determine whether any liabilities have been incurred as a result of potential increased nonperformance risk by third parties for which Duke Energy has issued guarantees. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Guarantees and Indemnifications,” for further details of the guarantee arrangements. Issuance of these guarantee arrangements is not required for the majority of Duke Energy’s operations. Thus, if Duke Energy discontinued issuing these guarantees, there would not be a material impact to the consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Other than the guarantee arrangements discussed in Note 8 and off-balance sheet debt related to non-consolidated VIEs, Duke Energy does not have any material off-balance sheet financing entities or structures. For additional information.information, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Variable Interest Entities."
Cash and Liquidity
The Subsidiary Registrants generally maintain minimal cash balances and use short-term borrowings to meet their working capital needs and other cash requirements. The Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, support their short-term borrowing needs through participation with Duke Energy and certain of its other subsidiaries in a money pool arrangement. The companies with short-term funds may provide short-term loans to affiliates participating under this arrangement. See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Debt and Credit Facilities,” for additional discussion of the money pool arrangement.
57

MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Duke Energy and the Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, may also use short-term debt, including commercial paper and the money pool, as a bridge to long-term debt financings. The levels of borrowing may vary significantly over the course of the year due to the timing of long-term debt financings and the impact of fluctuations in cash flows from operations. From time to time, Duke Energy’s current liabilities exceed current assets resulting from the use of short-term debt as a funding source to meet scheduled maturities of long-term debt, as well as cash needs, which can fluctuate due to the seasonality of its businesses.

63




MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


Equity Issuance
In order to strengthen its balance sheet and credit metrics and bolster cash flows, in November 2019,As of December 31, 2022, Duke Energy entered into forward sales agreements for $2.5had approximately $409 million of cash on hand, $5.2 billion of common stock equity expected to be settled in late 2020.available under its $9 billion Master Credit Facility. Duke Energy plansexpects to issue $500 millionhave sufficient liquidity in the form of common stock equity per year through at least 2022 through the DRIPcash on hand, cash from operations and ATM programs. Additionally, Duke Energy will utilize other instruments as needed. See Noteavailable credit capacity to support its funding needs. Refer to Notes 7 and 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt and Credit Facilities" and "Stockholders' Equity," respectively, for further information regarding Duke Energy's debt and equity issuances, in 2019.debt maturities and available credit facilities including the Master Credit Facility.
Credit Facilities and Registration Statements
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt and Credit Facilities," for further information regarding credit facilities and shelf registration statements available to Duke Energy and the Duke Energy Registrants.
CAPITAL EXPENDITURES
Duke Energy continues to focus on reducing risk and positioning its business for future success and will invest principally in its strongest business sectors. Duke Energy’s projected capital and investment expenditures, including AFUDC debt and capitalized interest, for the next three fiscal years are included in the table below.
(in millions)2020
2021
2022
New generation$115
$230
$475
Regulated renewables515
450
410
Environmental975
725
750
Nuclear fuel465
410
415
Major nuclear405
285
175
Customer additions630
630
620
Grid modernization and other transmission and distribution projects3,345
3,845
4,380
Maintenance and other2,275
1,925
2,050
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure8,725
8,500
9,275
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure2,275
1,950
1,150
Commercial Renewables and Other825
875
725
Total projected capital and investment expenditures$11,825
$11,325
$11,150
DEBT MATURITIES
See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt and Credit Facilities," for further information regarding significant components of Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
DIVIDEND PAYMENTSDividend Payments
In 2019,2022, Duke Energy paid quarterly cash dividends for the 93rd96th consecutive year and expects to continue its policy of paying regular cash dividends in the future. There is no assurance as to the amount of future dividends because they depend on future earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and are subject to the discretion of the Board of Directors.
Duke Energy targets a dividend payout ratio of betweenbetween 65% and 75%, basedbased upon adjusted diluted EPS, and expects this trend to continue through 2024. In 2019 and 2018,EPS. Duke Energy increased the dividend by approximatelyapproximately 2% annually in both 2022 and 4%, respectively,2021, and the company remains committed to continued growth of the dividend.
Dividend and Other Funding Restrictions of Duke Energy Subsidiaries
As discussed in Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters,” Duke Energy’s wholly owned public utility operating companies have restrictions on the amount of funds that can be transferred to Duke Energy through dividends, advances or loans as a result of conditions imposed by various regulators in conjunction with merger transactions. Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also have restrictions imposed by their first mortgage bond indentures and Articles of Incorporation, which in certain circumstances, limit their ability to make cash dividends or distributions on common stock. Additionally, certain other Duke Energy subsidiaries have other restrictions, such as minimum working capital and tangible net worth requirements pursuant to debt and other agreements that limit the amount of funds that can be transferred to Duke Energy. At December 31, 2019,2022, the amount of restricted net assets of wholly owned subsidiaries of Duke Energy that may not be distributed to Duke Energy in the form of a loan or dividend does not exceed a material amount of Duke Energy’s net assets. Duke Energy does not have any legal or other restrictions on paying common stock dividends to shareholders out of its consolidated equity accounts. Although these restrictions cap the amount of funding the various operating subsidiaries can provide to Duke Energy, management does not believe these restrictions will have a significant impact on Duke Energy’s ability to access cash to meet its payment of dividends on common stock and other future funding obligations.
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIESCash Flows From Operating Activities
Cash flows from operations of Electric UtilitiesEU&I and Infrastructure and Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I are primarily driven by sales of electricity and natural gas, respectively, and costs of operations. These cash flows from operations are relatively stable and comprise a substantial portion of Duke Energy’s operating cash flows. Weather conditions, working capital and commodity price fluctuations and unanticipated expenses including unplanned plant outages, storms, legal costs and related settlements can affect the timing and level of cash flows from operations.

64




MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


As part of Duke Energy’s continued effort to improve its cash flows from operations and liquidity, Duke Energy works with vendors to improve terms and conditions, including the extension of payment terms. To support this effort, Duke Energy established a supply chain finance program (the “program”) in 2020, under which suppliers, at their sole discretion, may sell their receivables from Duke Energy to the participating financial institution. The financial institution administers the program. Duke Energy does not issue any guarantees with respect to the program and does not participate in negotiations between suppliers and the financial institution. Duke Energy does not have an economic interest in the supplier’s decision to participate in the program and receives no interest, fees or other benefit from the financial institution based on supplier participation in the program. Suppliers’ decisions on which invoices are sold do not impact Duke Energy’s payment terms, which are based on commercial terms negotiated between Duke Energy and the supplier regardless of program participation. A significant deterioration in the credit quality of Duke Energy, economic downturn or changes in the financial markets could limit the financial institutions willingness to participate in the program. Duke Energy does not believe such risk would have a material impact on our cash flows from operations or liquidity, as substantially all our payments are made outside the program.
Duke Energy believes it has sufficient liquidity resources through the commercial paper markets, and ultimately, the Master Credit Facility, to support these operations. Cash flows from operations are subject to a number of other factors, including, but not limited to, regulatory constraints, economic trends and market volatility (see Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” for additional information).
At December 31, 2019, Duke Energy had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $311 million.
DEBT ISSUANCESDebt Issuances
Depending on availability based on the issuing entity, the credit rating of the issuing entity, and market conditions, the Subsidiary Registrants prefer to issue first mortgage bonds and secured debt, followed by unsecured debt. This preference is the result of generally higher credit ratings for first mortgage bonds and secured debt, which typically result in lower interest costs. Duke Energy Corporation primarily issues unsecured debt.
In 2020,2023, Duke Energy anticipates issuing additional securities of $6.7 billion through debt of $5.2 billion,capital markets. In certain instances Duke Energy may utilize instruments other than senior notes, including equity-content securities such as subordinated debt or preferred stock. Proceeds will primarily be for the purpose of funding capital expenditures and debt maturities. See to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt and Credit Facilities," for further information regarding significant debt issuances in 2019.issuances.
58

MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Duke Energy’s capitalization is balanced between debt and equity as shown in the table below.
Projected 2020
 Actual 2019
 Actual 2018
Projected 2023Actual 2022Actual 2021
Equity45% 44% 43%Equity41 %41 %43 %
Debt55% 56% 57%Debt59 %59 %57 %
Restrictive Debt Covenants
Duke Energy’s debt and credit agreements contain various financial and other covenants. Duke Energy's Master Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring the debt-to-total capitalization ratio to not exceed 65% for each borrower, excluding Piedmont, and 70% for Piedmont. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements or sublimits thereto. As of December 31, 2019, each 2022, Duke Energy presented approximately $131 million of long-term debt as current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a result of a technical default due to the bankruptcy filing of a Duke Energy customer. The Duke Energy Registrants waswere in compliance with all other covenants related to their debt agreements.agreements as of December 31, 2022. In addition, some credit agreements may allow for acceleration of payments or termination of the agreements due to nonpayment, or acceleration of other significant indebtedness of the borrower or some of its subsidiaries. None of the debt or credit agreements contain material adverse change clauses.

65




MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


Credit Ratings
Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. and S&P provide credit ratings for various Duke Energy Registrants. In January 2020, Fitch Ratings, Inc. publicly announced plans to withdraw the ratings on Duke Energy Corporation on or about February 20, 2020. The following table includes Duke Energy and certain subsidiaries’ credit ratings and ratings outlook as of February 2020.
2023.
Moody'sS&P
Duke Energy CorporationStableStable
Issuer Credit RatingBaa2BBB+
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa2BBB
Junior Subordinated Debt/Preferred StockBaa3BBB-
Commercial PaperP-2A-2
Duke Energy CarolinasStableStable
Senior Secured DebtAa3A
Senior Unsecured DebtA2BBB+
Progress EnergyStableStable
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1BBB
Duke Energy ProgressStableStable
Senior Secured DebtAa3A
Duke Energy FloridaMoody'sStableS&PStable
Duke Energy CorporationSenior Secured DebtStableA1StableA
Issuer Credit RatingBaa1A-
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1A3BBB+
Commercial PaperDuke Energy OhioP-2StableA-2Stable
Duke Energy CarolinasStableStable
Senior Secured DebtAa2A2A
Senior Unsecured DebtA1Baa1A-BBB+
ProgressDuke Energy IndianaStableStable
Senior Secured DebtAa3A
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1A2BBB+
Duke Energy ProgressKentuckyStableStable
Senior Secured DebtAa3A
Duke Energy FloridaStableStable
Senior Secured DebtA1A
Senior Unsecured DebtA3Baa1A-BBB+
Duke Energy OhioStableStable
Senior Secured DebtA2A
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1A-
Duke Energy IndianaStableStable
Senior Secured DebtAa3A
Senior Unsecured DebtA2A-
Duke Energy KentuckyStableStable
Senior Unsecured DebtBaa1A-
Piedmont Natural GasStableStable
Senior UnsecuredA3A-BBB+
Credit ratings are intended to provide credit lenders a framework for comparing the credit quality of securities and are not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold. The Duke Energy Registrants’ credit ratings are dependent on the rating agencies’ assessments of their ability to meet their debt principal and interest obligations when they come due. If, as a result of market conditions or other factors, the Duke Energy Registrants are unable to maintain current balance sheet strength, or if earnings and cash flow outlook materially deteriorates, credit ratings could be negatively impacted.
59

MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Cash Flow Information
The following table summarizes Duke Energy’s cash flows for the two most recently completed fiscal years.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
Cash flows provided by (used in):   
Operating activities$8,209
 $7,186
Investing activities(11,957) (10,060)
Financing activities3,730
 2,960
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash(18) 86
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period591
 505
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$573
 $591

66




MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities$5,927 $8,290 
Investing activities(11,973)(10,935)
Financing activities6,129 2,609 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash83 (36)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period520 556 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$603 $520 
OPERATING CASH FLOWS
The following table summarizes key components of Duke Energy’s operating cash flows for the two most recently completed fiscal years.
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019

2018
 Variance
(in millions)20222021Variance
Net income$3,571
 $2,644
 $927
Net income$2,455 $3,579 $(1,124)
Non-cash adjustments to net income5,761
 6,447
 (686)Non-cash adjustments to net income7,385 5,941 1,444 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(77) (141) 64
Contributions to qualified pension plans(58)— (58)
Payments for AROs(746) (533) (213)Payments for AROs(584)(540)(44)
Payment for disposal of other assets
 (105) 105
Refund of AMT credit carryforwards573
 
 573
Working capital(873) (1,126) 253
Working capital(2,081)(897)(1,184)
Other assets and Other liabilitiesOther assets and Other liabilities(1,190)207 (1,397)
Net cash provided by operating activities$8,209

$7,186
 $1,023
Net cash provided by operating activities$5,927 $8,290 $(2,363)
The variance was driven primarily by:
a $241$1,184 million increase in cash outflows from working capital and a $1,397 million increase in cash outflows from Other assets and Other liabilities primarily due to an increase in under-collected fuel used in generation due to higher commodity costs.
Partially offset by:
a $320 million increase in net income after adjustment for non-cash items primarily due to increaseshigher revenues from rate cases in revenues as a result of rate increases in the current year,various jurisdictions, favorable weather and volumes, partially offset by decreases in current year non-cash adjustments;an estimated impairment on the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
a $573 million refund of AMT credit carryforwards;
a $253 million decrease in cash outflows from working capital primarily due to fluctuations in accounts receivable balances, including a prior year increase for AMT refunds, and prior year increases in regulatory assets related to fuel costs, partially offset by fluctuations in inventory levels and current year decreases in property tax and severance accruals; and
a $105 million payment in the prior year for disposal of Beckjord.
Partially offset by:
a $213 million increase in payments for AROs.
INVESTING CASH FLOWS
The following table summarizes key components of Duke Energy’s investing cash flows for the two most recently completed fiscal years.
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019

2018
 Variance
(in millions)20222021Variance
Capital, investment and acquisition expenditures, net of return of investment capital$(11,435) $(9,668) $(1,767)Capital, investment and acquisition expenditures, net of return of investment capital$(11,419)$(9,752)$(1,667)
Debt and equity securities, net(5) (15) 10
Debt and equity securities, net90 85 
Disbursements to canceled equity method investmentsDisbursements to canceled equity method investments (855)855 
Other investing items(517) (377) (140)Other investing items(644)(333)(311)
Net cash used in investing activities$(11,957)
$(10,060) $(1,897)Net cash used in investing activities$(11,973)$(10,935)$(1,038)
The variance relates primarily to an increase in capital expenditures due to higher investments in EU&I, partially offset by a payment made in 2021 to fund ACP's outstanding debt. The primary use of cash related to investing activities is typically capital, investment and acquisition expenditures, net of return of investment capital detailed by reportable business segment in the following table. The increase includes expenditures related to line improvements in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment and pipeline construction and improvement in the Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment, as well as increased investment in the Commercial Renewables segment.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019

2018

Variance
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$8,258
 $8,086
 $172
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure1,533
 1,133
 400
Commercial Renewables1,423
 193
 1,230
Other221
 256
 (35)
Total capital, investment and acquisition expenditures, net of return of investment capital$11,435

$9,668

$1,767

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021Variance
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$8,985 $7,653 $1,332 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure1,295 1,271 24 
Other1,139 828 311 
Total capital, investment and acquisition expenditures, net of return of investment capital$11,419 $9,752 $1,667 
67
60




MD&ALIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES


FINANCING CASH FLOWS
The following table summarizes key components of Duke Energy’s financing cash flows for the two most recently completed fiscal years.
Years Ended December 31,
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 Variance
(in millions)20222021Variance
Issuance of common stock$384
 $1,838
 $(1,454)
Issuance of preferred stock1,962
 
 1,962
Issuances of long-term debt, net3,615
 2,393
 1,222
Issuances of long-term debt, net$7,478 $3,758 $3,720 
Notes payable and commercial paper(380) 1,171
 (1,551)Notes payable and commercial paper574 479 95 
Dividends paid(2,668) (2,471) (197)Dividends paid(3,179)(3,114)(65)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests843
 41
 802
Contributions from noncontrolling interests1,377 1,575 (198)
Other financing items(26) (12) (14)Other financing items(121)(89)(32)
Net cash provided by financing activities$3,730
 $2,960
 $770
Net cash provided by financing activities$6,129 $2,609 $3,520 
The variance was driven primarily by:
a $1,962 million increase in proceeds from the issuance of preferred stock;
a $1,222$3,720 million net increase in proceeds from issuances of long-term debt, primarily due to timing of issuances and redemptions of long-term debt; anddebt.
an $802Partially offset by:
a $198 million increasedecrease in contributions from noncontrolling interests, including $415 million related to the sale of a noncontrolling interest in the Commercial Renewables segment.
Partially offset by:
a $1,454 million decrease in proceeds from the issuance of common stock; and
a $1,551 million decrease in net borrowings from notes payable and commercial paper primarily due to the use of proceeds from the preferred stock issuance and increased long-term debt issuances used to pay down outstanding commercial paper.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Duke Energy and certain of its subsidiaries enterfewer project investments financed by tax equity being placed into guarantee arrangementsservice in the normal course of business to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties. These arrangements include performance guarantees, standby letters of credit, debt guarantees, surety bonds and indemnifications.current year.
Most of the guarantee arrangements entered into by Duke Energy enhance the credit standing of certain subsidiaries, non-consolidated entities or less than wholly owned entities, enabling them to conduct business. As such, these guarantee arrangements involve elements of performance and credit risk, which are not always included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The possibility of Duke Energy, either on its own or on behalf of Spectra Capital through indemnification agreements entered into as part of the January 2, 2007, spin-off of Spectra Energy Corp, having to honor its contingencies is largely dependent upon the future operations of the subsidiaries, investees and other third parties, or the occurrence of certain future events.
Duke Energy performs ongoing assessments of its respective guarantee obligations to determine whether any liabilities have been incurred as a result of potential increased non-performance risk by third parties for which Duke Energy has issued guarantees. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Guarantees and Indemnifications,” for further details of the guarantee arrangements. Issuance of these guarantee arrangements is not required for the majority of Duke Energy’s operations. Thus, if Duke Energy discontinued issuing these guarantees, there would not be a material impact to the consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
In November 2019, Duke Energy executed equity forward sales agreements. Settlement of the forward sales agreements are expected to occur on or prior to December 31, 2020. See Note 20 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Stockholders’ Equity” for further details on the equity forward sales agreements.
Other than the guarantee arrangements discussed above, the equity forward sales agreements and off-balance sheet debt related to non-consolidated VIEs, Duke Energy does not have any material off-balance sheet financing entities or structures. For additional information, see Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Variable Interest Entities".

68




MD&AOFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS AND CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS


Contractual Obligations
Duke Energy enters into contracts that require payment of cash at certain specified periods, based on certain specified minimum quantities and prices. The following table summarizes Duke Energy’s contractual cash obligations as of December 31, 2019.
 Payments Due By Period
         More than
   Less than
 2-3 years
 4-5 years
 5 years
   1 year
 (2021 &
 (2023 &
 (2025 &
(in millions)Total
 (2020)
 2022)
 2024)
 beyond)
Long-term debt(a)
$56,174
 $3,021
 $9,135
 $4,870
 $39,148
Interest payments on long-term debt(b)
33,988
 2,163
 3,986
 3,516
 24,323
Finance leases(c)
1,659
 181
 359
 296
 823
Operating leases(c)
2,036
 268
 417
 367
 984
Purchase obligations:(d)
 
  
  
  
  
Fuel and purchased power(e)(f)
26,250
 4,124
 5,390
 3,798
 12,938
Other purchase obligations(g)
5,456
 4,836
 322
 76
 222
Nuclear decommissioning trust annual funding(h)
606
 24
 62
 62
 458
Land easements(i)
217
 9
 18
 20
 170
Total contractual cash obligations(j)(k)
$126,386
 $14,626
 $19,689
 $13,005
 $79,066
(a)See Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Debt and Credit Facilities.”
(b)Interest payments on variable rate debt instruments were calculated using December 31, 2019, interest rates and holding them constant for the life of the instruments.
(c)See Note 6 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Leases.” Amounts in the table above include the interest component of finance leases based on the interest rates stated in the lease agreements and exclude certain related executory costs. Amounts exclude contingent lease obligations.
(d)Current liabilities, except for current maturities of long-term debt, and purchase obligations reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets have been excluded from the above table.
(e)Includes firm capacity payments that provide Duke Energy with uninterrupted firm access to electricity transmission capacity and natural gas transportation contracts, as well as undesignated contracts and contracts that qualify as NPNS. For contracts where the price paid is based on an index, the amount is based on market prices at December 31, 2019, or the best projections of the index. For certain of these amounts, Duke Energy may settle on a net cash basis since Duke Energy has entered into payment netting arrangements with counterparties that permit Duke Energy to offset receivables and payables with such counterparties.
(f)Amounts exclude obligations under the OVEC PPA. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Variable Interest Entities," for additional information.
(g)Includes contracts for software, telephone, data and consulting or advisory services. Amount also includes contractual obligations for EPC costs for new generation plants, wind and solar facilities, plant refurbishments, maintenance and day-to-day contract work and commitments to buy certain products. Amount excludes certain open purchase orders for services that are provided on demand for which the timing of the purchase cannot be determined.
(h)Related to future annual funding obligations to NDTF through nuclear power stations' relicensing dates. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Asset Retirement Obligations."
(i)Related to Commercial Renewables wind facilities.
(j)Unrecognized tax benefits of $126 million are not reflected in this table as Duke Energy cannot predict when open income tax years will close with completed examinations. See Note 24 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Income Taxes."
(k)The table above excludes reserves for litigation, environmental remediation, asbestos-related injuries and damages claims and self-insurance claims (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies”) because Duke Energy is uncertain as to the timing and amount of cash payments that will be required. Additionally, the table above excludes annual insurance premiums that are necessary to operate the business, including nuclear insurance (see Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Commitments and Contingencies”), funding of pension and other post-retirement benefit plans (see Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Employee Benefit Plans"), AROs, including ash management expenditures (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Asset Retirement Obligations") and regulatory liabilities (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Regulatory Matters”) because the amount and timing of the cash payments are uncertain. Also excluded are Deferred Income Taxes and ITCs recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets since cash payments for income taxes are determined based primarily on taxable income for each discrete fiscal year.
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Risk Management Policies
The Enterprise Risk Management policy framework at Duke Energy includes strategy, operational, project execution and financial or transaction related risks. Enterprise Risk Management includes market risk as part of the financial and transaction related risks in its framework.

69




MD&AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Duke Energy is exposed to market risks associated with commodity prices, interest rates and equity prices. Duke Energy has established comprehensive risk management policies to monitor and manage these market risks. Duke Energy’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer are responsible for the overall approval of market risk management policies and the delegation of approval and authorization levels. The Finance and Risk Management Committee of the Board of Directors receives periodic updates from the Chief Risk Officer and other members of management on market risk positions, corporate exposures and overall risk management activities. The Chief Risk Officer is responsible for the overall governance of managing commodity price risk, including monitoring exposure limits.
The following disclosures about market risk contain forward-looking statements that involve estimates, projections, goals, forecasts, assumptions, risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results or outcomes to differ materially from those expressed in the forward-looking statements. See Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” and “Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information” for a discussion of the factors that may impact any such forward-looking statements made herein.
Commodity Price Risk
Price risk represents the potential risk of loss from adverse changes in the market price of electricity or other energy commodities. Duke Energy’s exposure to commodity price risk is influenced by a number of factors, including the effects of regulation, commodity contract size and length, market liquidity, market conditions, location and unique or specific contract terms. Duke Energy is exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the prices of electricity, coal, natural gas and other energy-related products marketed and purchased as a result of its ownership of energy-related assets.
Duke Energy’s exposure to these fluctuations through its regulated utility operations is primarily limited by thesince these operations are subject to cost-based regulation of its regulated operations as these operationsand are typically allowed to recover substantially all of these costs through various cost-recoverycost recovery clauses, including fuel clauses, formula-based contracts, or other cost-sharing mechanisms. While there may be a delay in timing between when these costs are incurred and when they are recovered through rates, changes from year to year generally do not have a material impact on operating results of these regulated operations. Within Duke Energy’s Commercial Renewables segment, the company has limited exposure to market price fluctuations in prices of energy-related products as a result of its ownership of renewable assets.
Price risk represents the potential risk of loss from adverse changes in the market price of electricity or other energy commodities. Duke Energy’s exposure to commodity price risk is influenced by a number of factors, including contract size, length, market liquidity, location and unique or specific contract terms. Duke Energy employs established policies and procedures to manage risks associated with these market fluctuations, which may include using various commodity derivatives, such as swaps, futures, forwards and options. For additional information, see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Derivatives and Hedging.”
Generation Portfolio Risks
For the EU&I segment, the generation portfolio not utilized to serve retail operations or committed load is subject to commodity price fluctuations. However, the impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations is limited due to mechanisms in these regulated jurisdictions that result in the sharing of most of the net profits from these activities with retail customers.
Hedging Strategies
Duke Energy closely monitors risks associated with commodity price changes on its future operations and, where appropriate, uses various commodity instruments such as electricity, coal and natural gas forwardhedging contracts and options to mitigate the effect of such fluctuations on operations. Duke Energy’s primary use of energy commodity derivatives is to hedge against exposure to the prices of power, fuel for generation and natural gas for customers. Additionally,
61

MD&AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Duke Energy’s Commercial Renewables business may enter into short-term or long-termEnergy also manages its exposure to basis risk through the use of congestion hedge agreements to manage price risk associated with project output.
products in RTOs such as financial transmission rights (PJM and MISO),which result in payments based on differentials in locational marginal prices. The majority of instruments used to manage Duke Energy’s commodity price exposure are either not designated as hedges or do not qualify for hedge accounting. These instruments are referred to as undesignated contracts. Mark-to-market changes for undesignated contracts entered into by regulated businesses are reflected as regulatory assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Undesignated contracts entered into by unregulated businesses are marked-to-market each period, with changes in the fair value of the derivative instruments reflected in earnings.
Duke Energy may also enter into other contracts that qualify for the NPNS exception. When a contract meets the criteria to qualify as NPNS, Duke Energy applies such exception. Income recognition and realization related to NPNS contracts generally coincide with the physical delivery of the commodity. For contracts qualifying for the NPNS exception, no recognition of the contract’s fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements is required until settlement of the contract as long as the transaction remains probable of occurring.
Generation Portfolio Risks 
The Duke Energy Registrants optimize the value of their generation portfolios, which include generation assets, fuel and emission allowances. Modeled forecasts of future generation output and fuel requirements are based on forward power and fuel markets. The component pieces of the portfolio are bought and sold based on models and forecasts of generation in order to manage the economic value of the portfolio in accordance with the strategies of the business units.
For the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment, the generation portfolio not utilized to serve retail operations or committed load is subject to commodity price fluctuations. However, the impact on the Consolidated Statements of Operations is partially offset by mechanisms in these regulated jurisdictions that result in the sharing of net profits from these activities with retail customers.
Interest Rate Risk
Duke Energy is exposed to risk resulting from changes in interest rates as a result of its issuance or anticipated issuance of variable and fixed-rate debt and commercial paper. Duke Energy manages interest rate exposure by limiting variable-rate exposures to a percentage of total debt and by monitoring the effects of market changes in interest rates. Duke Energy also enters into financial derivative instruments, which may include instruments such as, but not limited to, interest rate swaps, swaptions and U.S. Treasury lock agreements to manage and mitigate interest rate risk exposure. See Notes 1, 7, 15 and 17 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” “Debt and Credit Facilities,” “Derivatives and Hedging,” and “Fair Value Measurements.”
Duke Energy had $8.6had $9.2 billion of unhedged long- and short-term floating interest rate exposure at December 31, 2019.2022. The impact of a 100-basis point change in interest rates on pretax income is approximately $86$92 million at December 31, 2019.2022. This amount was estimated by considering the impact of the hypothetical interest rates on variable-rate securities outstanding, adjusted for interest rate hedges as of December 31, 2019.2022.

Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
70




MD&AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Certain Duke Energy Registrants have variable-rateis exposed to risk resulting from changes in the foreign currency exchange rates as a result of its issuances of long-term debt and manage interest ratedenominated in a foreign currency. Duke Energy manages foreign currency exchange risk exposure by entering into cross-currency swaps, a type of financial contracts including interest rate swaps.derivative instrument, which mitigate foreign currency exchange exposure. See Notes 7, 15 and 1517 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Debt“Debt and Credit Facilities"Facilities,” “Derivatives and "DerivativesHedging” and Hedging.“Fair Value Measurements," Such financial arrangements generally are indexed based upon LIBOR, which is expected to be phased out by the end of 2021. The Secured Overnight Financing Rate (SOFR) has been identified by regulators and industry participants as the preferred successor rate for U.S. dollar-based LIBOR at that time. Impacted financial arrangements extending beyond 2021 may require contractual amendment or termination and renegotiation to fully adapt to a post-LIBOR environment, and there may be uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of any such alternative index methodologies. Alternative index provisions are being assessed and incorporated into new financial arrangements that extend beyond 2021. Additionally, the progress of the phaseout is being monitored, including proposed transition relief from the FASB.respectively.
Credit Risk
Credit risk represents the loss that the Duke Energy Registrants would incur if a counterparty fails to perform under its contractual obligations. Where exposed to credit risk, the Duke Energy Registrants analyze the counterparty's financial condition prior to entering into an agreement and monitor exposure on an ongoing basis. The Duke Energy Registrants establish credit limits where appropriate in the context of contractual arrangements and monitor such limits.
To reduce credit exposure, the Duke Energy Registrants seek to include netting provisions with counterparties, which permit the offset of receivables and payables with such counterparties. The Duke Energy Registrants also frequently use master agreements with credit support annexes to further mitigate certain credit exposures. The master agreements provide for a counterparty to post cash or letters of credit to the exposed party for exposure in excess of an established threshold. The threshold amount represents a negotiated unsecured credit limit for each party to the agreement, determined in accordance with the Duke Energy Registrants’ internal corporate credit practices and standards. Collateral agreements generally also provide that the failure to post collateral when required is sufficient cause to terminate transactions and liquidate all positions.
The Duke Energy Registrants also obtain cash, letters of credit, or surety bonds from certain counterparties to provide credit support outside of collateral agreements, where appropriate, based on a financial analysis of the counterparty and the regulatory or contractual terms and conditions applicable to each transaction. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Derivatives and Hedging,” for additional information regarding credit risk related to derivative instruments.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ principal counterparties for its electric and natural gas businesses are RTOs, distribution companies, municipalities, electric cooperatives and utilities located throughout the U.S. Exposure to these entities consists primarily of amounts due to Duke Energy Registrants for delivered electricity. Additionally, there may be potential risks associated with remarketing of energy and capacity in the event of default by wholesale power customers. The Duke Energy Registrants have concentrations of receivables from certain of such entities that may affect the Duke Energy Registrants’ credit risk.
The Duke Energy Registrants are also subject to credit risk from transactions with their suppliers that involve prepayments or milestone payments in conjunction with outsourcing arrangements, major construction projects and certain commodity purchases. The Duke Energy Registrants’ credit exposure to such suppliers may take the form of increased costs or project delays in the event of non-performance.nonperformance. The Duke Energy Registrants' frequently require guarantees or letters of credit from suppliers to mitigate this credit risk.
Credit risk associated with the Duke Energy Registrants’ service to residential, commercial and industrial customers is generally limited to outstanding accounts receivable. The Duke Energy Registrants mitigate this credit risk by requiring tariff customers to provide a cash deposit, letter of credit or surety bond until a satisfactory payment history is established, subject to the rules and regulations in effect in each retail jurisdiction at which time the deposit is typically refunded. Charge-offs for retail customers have historically been insignificant to the operations of the Duke Energy Registrants and are typically recovered through retail rates. Management continually monitors customer charge-offs, and payment patterns and the impact of current economic conditions on customers' ability to pay their outstanding balance to ensure the adequacy of bad debt reserves.
62

MD&AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
In response to the COVID-19 pandemic that began in March 2020, the Duke Energy Registrants announced a suspension of disconnections for nonpayment to assist customers during the national emergency. While disconnections have resumed, the company continued to offer flexible options to customers struggling with the pandemic and the economic fallout, including extended payment arrangements to satisfy delinquent balances through June 2021. Since then, the company has resumed standard payment arrangement options. The Duke Energy Registrants are monitoring the effects of the resultant economic slowdown on counterparties’ abilities to perform under their contractual obligations. The Duke Energy Registrants experienced higher charge-offs during 2022, and higher utility account balances in arrears as of December 31, 2022. There is an expectation for the increase in charge-offs to continue in the near term. The Duke Energy Registrants have reserved for these estimated losses in the allowance for doubtful account balance. See Notes 4 and 19 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Revenue," respectively, for more information. Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana sell certain of their accounts receivable and related collections through CRC, a Duke Energy consolidated VIE. Losses on collection are first absorbed by the equity of CRC and next by the subordinated retained interests held by Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky and Duke Energy Indiana. See Note 18 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Variable Interest Entities.”
The Duke Energy also providesRegistrants provide certain non-tariff services, primarily to large commercial and industrial customers in which incurred costs, including invested capital, are intended to be recovered from the individual customer and therefore are not subject to rate recovery in the event of customer default. Customer credit worthinesscreditworthiness is assessed prior to entering into these transactions.
Duke Energy’s Commercial Renewables segment enters into long-term agreements with certain creditworthy buyers that may not include the right to call for collateral in the event of a credit rating downgrade. Credit concentration exists to certain counterparties on these agreements, including entities that could be subject to wildfire liability. Additionally, Commercial Renewables may invest in projects for which buyers are below investment grade, although such buyers are required to post negotiated amounts of credit support. Also, power sales agreements and/or hedges of project output are generally for an initial term that does not cover the entire life of the asset. As a result, Commercial Renewables is exposed to market price risk and credit risk related to these agreements.transactions exists for certain of these customers.
Duke Energy Carolinas has third-party insurance to cover certain losses related to asbestos-related injuries and damages above an aggregate self-insured retention. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Commitments and Contingencies" for information on asbestos-related injuries and damages claims.
The Duke Energy Registrants also have credit risk exposure through issuance of performance and financial guarantees, letters of credit and surety bonds on behalf of less than wholly owned entities and third parties. Where the Duke Energy Registrants have issued these guarantees, it is possible that they could be required to perform under these guarantee obligations in the event the obligor under the guarantee fails to perform. Where the Duke Energy Registrants have issued guarantees related to assets or operations that have been disposed of via sale, they attempt to secure indemnification from the buyer against all future performance obligations under the guarantees. See Note 8 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Guarantees and Indemnifications,” for further information on guarantees issued by the Duke Energy Registrants.

71




MD&AQUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


Duke Energy is subject to credit risk from transactions with counterparties to cross-currency swaps related to future interest and principal payments. The credit exposure to such counterparties may take the form of higher costs to meet Duke Energy's future euro-denominated interest and principal payments in the event of counterparty default. Duke Energy selects highly rated banks as counterparties and allocates the hedge for each debt issuance across multiple counterparties. The master agreements with the counterparties impose collateral requirements on the parties in certain circumstances indicative of material deterioration in a party's creditworthiness.
Based on the Duke Energy Registrants’ policies for managing credit risk, their exposures and their credit and other reserves, the Duke Energy Registrants do not currently anticipate a materially adverse effect on their consolidated financial position or results of operations as a result of non-performancenonperformance by any counterparty.
Marketable Securities Price Risk
As described further in Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” Duke Energy invests in debt and equity securities as part of various investment portfolios to fund certain obligations. The vast majority of investments in equity securities are within the NDTF and assets of the various pension and other post-retirement benefit plans.
Pension Plan Assets
Duke Energy maintains investments to facilitate funding the costs of providing non-contributory defined benefit retirement and other post-retirement benefit plans. These investments are exposed to price fluctuations in equity markets and changes in interest rates. The equity securities held in these pension plans are diversified to achieve broad market participation and reduce the impact of any single investment, sector or geographic region. Duke Energy has established asset allocation targets for its pension plan holdings, which take into consideration the investment objectives and the risk profile with respect to the trust in which the assets are held. See Note 23 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Employee Benefit Plans,” for additional information regarding investment strategy of pension plan assets.
A significant decline in the value of plan asset holdings could require Duke Energy to increase funding of its pension plans in future periods, which could adversely affect cash flows in those periods. Additionally, a decline in the fair value of plan assets, absent additional cash contributions to the plan, could increase the amount of pension cost required to be recorded in future periods, which could adversely affect Duke Energy’s results of operations in those periods.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds
As required by the NRC, NCUC, PSCSC and FPSC, subsidiaries of Duke Energy maintain trust funds to fund the costs of nuclear decommissioning. As of December 31, 2019,2022, these funds were invested primarily in domestic and international equity securities, debt securities, cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments. Per the NRC, Internal Revenue Code, NCUC, PSCSC and FPSC requirements, these funds may be used only for activities related to nuclear decommissioning. These investments are exposed to price fluctuations in equity markets and changes in interest rates. Duke Energy actively monitors its portfolios by benchmarking the performance of its investments against certain indices and by maintaining, and periodically reviewing, target allocation percentages for various asset classes.
Accounting for nuclear decommissioning recognizes that costs are recovered through retail and wholesale rates; therefore, fluctuations in investment prices do not materially affect the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as changes in the fair value of these investments are primarily deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities pursuant to Orders by the NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC and FERC. Earnings or losses of the fundfunds will ultimately impact the amount of costs recovered through retail and wholesale rates. See Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Asset Retirement Obligations,” for additional information regarding nuclear decommissioning costs. See Note 16 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Investments in Debt and Equity Securities,” for additional information regarding NDTF assets.
63

MD&AOTHER MATTERS
OTHER MATTERS
Environmental Regulations
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, coal ash and other environmental matters. These regulations can be changed from time to time and result in new obligations of the Duke Energy Registrants.
The following sections outline various proposed and recently enacted legislation and regulations that may impact the Duke Energy Registrants. Refer to Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters," for further information regarding potential plant retirements and regulatory filings related to the Duke Energy Registrants.
Coal Combustion Residuals
In April 2015, EPA published a rule to regulate the disposal of CCR from electric utilities as solid waste. The federal regulation classifies CCR as nonhazardous waste and allows for beneficial use of CCR with some restrictions. The regulation applies to all new and existing landfills, new and existing surface impoundments receiving CCR and existing surface impoundments located at stations generating electricity (regardless of fuel source), which were no longer receiving CCR but contained liquids as of the effective date of the rule. The rule establishes requirements regarding landfill design, structural integrity design and assessment criteria for surface impoundments, groundwater monitoring, protection and remedial procedures and other operational and reporting procedures to ensure the safe disposal and management of CCR. Various industry and environmental parties appealed EPA's CCR rule in the D.C. Circuit Court. On April 18, 2016, EPA filed a motion with the federal court to settle five issues raised in litigation. On June 14, 2016, the court approved the motion with respect to all of those issues. Duke Energy does not expect a material impact from the settlement or that it will result in additional ARO adjustments. On September 13, 2017, EPA responded to a petition by the Utility Solid Waste Activities Group that the agency would reconsider certain provisions of the final rule, and asked the D.C. Circuit Court to suspend the litigation. The D.C. Circuit Court denied EPA’s petition to suspend the litigation and oral argument was held on November 20, 2017. On August 21, 2018, the D.C. Circuit issued its decision in the CCR rule litigation denying relief for industry petitioners' remaining claims and ruling in favor of environmental petitioners on a number of their challenges, including the regulation of inactive CCR surface impoundments at retired plants and the continued operation of unlined impoundments.

72




MD&AOTHER MATTERS


On March 15, 2018, EPA published proposed amendments to the federal CCR rule, including revisions that were required as part of the CCR litigation settlement, as well as changes that the agency considered warranted due to the passage of the Water Infrastructure Improvements for the Nation Act, which provides statutory authority for state and federal CCR permit programs. On July 17, 2018, EPA issued a rule (Phase 1, Part 1) finalizing certain, but not all, elements included in the agency's March 15, 2018, proposal. The final rule revises certain closure deadlines and groundwater protection standards in the CCR rule. It does not change the primary requirements for groundwater monitoring, corrective action, inspections and maintenance, and closure, and thus does not materially affect Duke Energy’s coal ash basin closure plans or compliance obligations under the CCR rule. On October 22, 2018, a coalition of environmental groups filed a petition for review in the D.C. Circuit Court challenging EPA's final Phase 1, Part 1 revisions to the CCR rule. On March 13, 2019, the D.C. Circuit Court issued an order in the Phase 1, Part 1 litigation granting EPA’s motion to remand the rule without vacatur. EPA is currently conducting multiple notice-and-comment rulemakings to implement the court’s decision on remand.
In addition to the requirements of the federal CCR rule, CCR landfills and surface impoundments will continue to be regulated by mostthe states. Cost recovery for future expenditures will be pursued through the normal ratemaking process with federal and state utility commissions and via wholesale contracts, which permit recovery of necessary and prudently incurred costs associated with Duke Energy’sEnergy��s regulated operations. For more information, see Notes 4 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and "Asset Retirement Obligations," respectively.
Coal Ash Management Act of 2014
AROs recorded on the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019,2022, and December 31, 2018,2021, include the legal obligation for closure of coal ash basins and the disposal of related ash as a result of the Coal Ash Act, the EPA CCR rule and other agreements. The Coal Ash Act includes a variance procedure for compliance deadlines and other issues surrounding the management of CCR and CCR surface impoundments and prohibits cost recovery in customer rates for unlawful discharge of ash impoundment waters occurring after January 1, 2014. The Coal Ash Act leaves the decision on cost recovery determinations related to closure of ash impoundments to the normal ratemaking processes before utility regulatory commissions.
Consistent with the requirements of the Coal Ash Act, Duke Energy previously submitted comprehensive site assessments and groundwater corrective action plans to NCDEQ. In addition, onOn December 31, 2019, Duke Energy submitted updated groundwater corrective action plans for six sites in North Carolina and site-specific coal ash impoundment closure plans for all 14 North Carolina sites to NCDEQ. In addition, from 2020 through 2022, Duke Energy submitted updated comprehensive site assessments and groundwater corrective action plans for the remaining North Carolina sites, except for Buck Steam Station, which Duke Energy expects to submit in June 2023.
On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination requiring Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments at the Allen, Belews Creek, Rogers, Marshall, Mayo and Roxboro facilities in North Carolina. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed Petitions for Contested Case Hearings in the Office of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. On December 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress entered into a settlement agreement with NCDEQ and certain community groups under which Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress agreed to excavate seven of the nine remaining coal ash basins at these sites with ash moved to on-site lined landfills, including two at Allen, one at Belews Creek, one at Mayo, one at Roxboro, and two at Rogers. At the two remaining basins at Marshall and Roxboro, uncapped basin ash will be excavated and moved to lined landfills. Those portions of the basins at Marshall and Roxboro, which were previously filled with ash and on which permitted facilities were constructed, will not be disturbed and will be closed pursuant to other state regulations. For more information, see Note 5, "Commitments and Contingencies," to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Following NCDEQ's April 1 Order, Duke Energy estimated the incremental undiscounted cost to close the nine remaining impoundments by excavation would be approximately $4 billion to $5 billion, potentially increasing the total estimated costs to permanently close all ash basins in North Carolina and South Carolina to $9.5 billion to $10.5 billion. The settlement lowerslowered the estimated total undiscounted cost to close the nine remaining basins by excavation by approximately $1.5 billion as compared to Duke Energy’s original estimate that followed the order. As a result, the estimated total cost to permanently close all ash basins in North Carolina and South Carolina is nowwas estimated to be approximately $8 billion to $9 billion, of which approximately $2.3approximately $3.5 billion has been spent through 2019.2022. The majority of the remaining spend is expected to occur over the next 15-2010 to 15 years.
Duke Energy intends to seek recovery of all costs through the ratemaking process consistent with previous proceedings.
In 2019, Duke Energyhas completed excavation of all coal ash at the Riverbend, and Dan River, plantsAsheville and coal ash regulated by the Coal Ash Act at the Sutton plant.plants.
For further information on ash basins and recovery, see Notes 4 and 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters" and “Asset Retirement Obligations,” respectively.

7364




MD&AOTHER MATTERS


Estimated Cost and Impacts of RulemakingsNorth Carolina House Bill 951
On October 13, 2021, North Carolina House Bill 951 (HB 951) was signed into law (the “Legislation”). This Legislation establishes a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance state CO2 emission reductions from electric generating facilities in the state through the use of least cost planning while providing for continued reliability and affordable rates for customers served by such generation. It also authorizes the use of performance-based regulation in North Carolina. Among other things, the Legislation requires the NCUC to:
develop an initial carbon plan that would target a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from public utilities' electric generation in the state by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050, considering all resource options and the latest technology;
adopt rules to implement the requirements of the Legislation authorizing PBR that includes MYRP with a maximum three-year term, performance incentive mechanisms to track utility performance, and revenue decoupling for the residential customer class;
establish rules to securitize costs associated with the early retirement of subcritical coal-fired electric generating facilities necessary to achieve the authorized carbon reduction goals at 50% of remaining net book value, with the remaining net book value recovered through normal cost-of-service basis; and
initiate a process for updating rates and terms of certain existing solar power purchase agreements executed under PURPA.
In October 2022 and January 2023, Duke Energy will incur capital expenditures to complyProgress and Duke Energy Carolinas, respectively, filed applications with the environmental regulationsNCUC, which proposed implementation of the Legislation’s provisions around PBR, including MYRP, residential decoupling and rules discussed above. The following table,performance incentive mechanisms. Additionally, on December 30, 2022, the NCUC issued an order adopting the first Carbon Plan as of December 31, 2019, provides five-year estimated costs, excluding AFUDC, of new control equipment that may need to be installed on existing power plants primarily to comply withdirected by the Coal Ash Act requirements for conversion to dry disposal of bottom ash and fly ash, CWA 316(b) and Effluent Limitations Guidelines through December 31, 2024. The table excludes ash basin closure costs recorded in Asset retirement obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. For more information related to AROs, seeLegislation.
See Note 104, "Regulatory Matters" to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(in millions)Five-Year Estimated Costs
Duke Energy$280
Duke Energy Carolinas135
Progress Energy90
Duke Energy Progress60
Duke Energy Florida30
Duke Energy Ohio5
Duke Energy Indiana50
The Duke Energy Registrants also expect to incur increased fuel, purchased power, operation and maintenance and other expenses, in addition to costsStatements for replacement generation for potential coal-fired power plant retirements, as a result of these regulations. Actual compliance costs incurred may be materially different from these estimates due to reasons such as the timing and requirements of EPA regulations and the resolution of legal challenges to the rules. The Duke Energy Registrants intend to seek rate recovery of necessary and prudently incurred costs associated with regulated operations to comply with these regulations.more information.
Other Environmental Regulations
The Duke Energy Registrants are also subject to various federal, state and local laws regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal and other environmental matters, including the following:
Clean Water Act
Steam Effluent Limitation Guidelines
Cross-State Air Pollution Rule
Clean Power Plan/ACE Rule
matters. Duke Energy continues to comply with enacted environmental statutes and regulations even as certain of these regulations are in various stages of clarification, revision or legal challenge. The Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these matters.
Section 126 PetitionsGlobal Climate Change and Regulation of GHG Emissions
On November 16, 2016,In 2021, President Biden recommitted the stateUnited States to the Paris Agreement and announced a new target for the United States of Maryland filed50% to 52% reduction in economywide net GHG emissions from 2005 levels by 2030. The U.S. submittal to support this Paris target includes a petition withgoal for 100% carbon-free electricity by 2035. These actions have been supplemented by a number of executive orders by President Biden and an indication by a number of regulatory agencies, including the EPA, under Section 126 of the Clean Air Act alleging that 19 power plants, including two plants (three units) thatthey would impose additional regulations on CO2 and methane emissions to which Duke Energy Registrants own and operate, contribute to violations of EPA’s National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for ozone in the state of Maryland. On March 12, 2018, the state of New York filed a petition with EPA, also under Section 126 of the Clean Air Act alleging that over 60 power plants, including six that Duke Energy Registrants own and operate, contribute to violations of EPA’s ozone NAAQS in the state of New York. Both Maryland and New York sought EPA orders requiring the states in which the named power plants operate impose more stringent NOx emission limitations on the plants. On October 5, 2018, EPA denied the Maryland petition. That same day, Maryland appealed EPA's denial, On October 18, 2019, EPA denied the New York petition, and New York appealed that decision on October 29, 2019. Both appeals are before the D.C. Circuit Court. The impact of these petitions couldwill be more stringent requirements for the operation of NOx emission controls at these plants.subject. The Duke Energy Registrants are monitoring these matters and cannot predict the outcome, of these matters.however, there could be a material impact on our clean energy transition.
Global Climate ChangeCO2 Emissions Reductions
On September 17,The Duke Energy Registrants’ direct GHG emissions consist primarily of CO2 that results primarily from operating a fleet of coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants to serve its customers reliably and affordably. In 2019, Duke Energy announced an updated climate strategy with a new goalgoals of at least 50% reduction in carbon emissions from 2005 levels from electric generation by 2030 and net-zero carbon emissions from electric generation by 2050. TimelinesIn February 2022, we added Scope 2 and certain Scope 3 emissions, including emissions from upstream purchased power and fossil fuel purchases, as well as downstream customer use of natural gas, to our 2050 net-zero goal. In October 2022, we announced an additional interim target to reduce carbon emissions from electric generation by 80% from 2005 levels by 2040. Duke Energy also adopted an interim goal of reducing Scope 2 and Scope 3 emissions mentioned above by 50% below 2021 levels by 2035.
The Duke Energy Registrants have taken actions that have resulted in a reduction of CO2 emissions over time. Between 2005 and 2022, the Duke Energy Registrants have collectively lowered the CO2 emissions from their electricity generation by 44%. Timelines and initiatives, as well as implementation of new technologies, for future reductions of GHG emissions will vary in each state in which the company operates and will involve collaboration with regulators, customers and other stakeholders.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ GHG emissions consist primarily ofgoals announced in 2019, and updated in 2022, as well as the actions taken to reduce CO2 and result primarily from operating a fleet of coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants. In 2019, the Duke Energy Registrants’ power plants emitted approximately 93 million tons of CO2. Future levels of CO2 emissions, will be influenced by variables that include fuel prices, market prices, compliance with new or existing regulations, economic conditions that affect electricity demand and the technologies deployed to generate the electricity necessary to meet the customer demand.

74




MD&AOTHER MATTERS


The Duke Energy Registrants have taken actions that have resulted in a reduction of CO2 emissions over time. Actions have included the retirement of 47 coal-fired Electric Generating Units with a combined generating capacity of 5,425 MW. Much of that capacity has been replaced with state-of-the-art highly efficient natural gas-fired generation that produces far fewer CO2 emissions per unit of electricity generated. Duke Energy also has made investments to expand its portfolio of wind and solar projects, increase EE offerings and invest in its zero-CO2 emissions hydropower and nuclear plants. These efforts have diversified its system and significantly reduced CO2 emissions. Between 2005 and 2019, the Duke Energy Registrants have collectively lowered the CO2 emissions from their electricity generation by 39%, which potentially lowerslower the exposure to any future mandatory CO2 emission reduction requirements, or carbon tax, whether as a result of federal legislation, EPA regulation, state regulation or other as yet unknown emission reduction requirement.
Actions to reduce CO2 emissions have included the retirement of 56 coal-fired electric generating units with a combined generating capacity of 7,500 MW, while investing in renewables and state-of-the-art highly efficient natural gas-fired generation that produces far fewer CO2 emissions per unit of electricity generated than coal. Duke Energy also has made investments to increase EE offerings and ensure continued operations of its zero-CO2 emissions hydropower and nuclear plants. These efforts have diversified its system and significantly reduced CO2 emissions.
Duke Energy will continue to explore the use of currently available and commercially demonstrated technology to reduce CO2 emissions, including EE, wind, solar and storage, as well as evolving technologies like carbon capture, utilization and storage, the use of hydrogen and other low-carbon fuels, long-duration storage and nuclear.advanced nuclear, in its efforts to achieve its net-zero goal as well as to comply with any future regulations. Duke Energy willplans to adjust to and incorporate evolving and innovative technologies in a way that balances the reliability and affordability that customers expect.while meeting regulatory requirements and customer demands. Under any future scenario involving mandatory CO2 limitations, the Duke Energy Registrants would plan to seek recovery of their compliance costs through appropriate regulatory mechanisms.
The Future levels of GHG emissions by the Duke Energy Registrants recognize certain groups associate severe weather events with increasing levels of GHGswill be influenced by variables that include capacity needs in the atmospherejurisdictions in which they operate, public policy, tax incentives, economic conditions that affect electricity demand, fuel prices, market prices, availability of resources and forecastlabor, compliance with new or existing regulations, the possibility these weather events could have a material impact on future results of operations should they occur more frequentlyability to make enhancements to transmission and with greater severity. However, the uncertain nature of potential changes in extreme weather events (such asdistribution systems to support increased frequency, duration and severity), the long period of time over which any potential changes might take placerenewables, and the inabilityexistence of new technologies that can be deployed to predict potential changes with any degree of accuracy, make estimating any potential future financial riskgenerate the electricity necessary to meet customer demand.
65

MD&AOTHER MATTERS
Currently, the Duke Energy Registrants’ operations impossible.Registrants do not purchase carbon credits or offsets for use in connection with the company's net-zero emissions goals. Though they may purchase carbon credits or offsets for such uses in the future, the amount or cost of which is not expected to be material at this time.
Generation Mix Planning Process
The Duke Energy Registrants annually, biennially or triennially prepare lengthy, forward-looking IRPs. These detailed, highly technical plans are based on the company’s thorough analysis of numerous factors that can impact the cost of producing and delivering electricity that influence long-term generation resource planning decisions. The IRP process helps to evaluate a range of options, taking into account stakeholder input as well as forecasts of future electricity demand, fuel prices, transmission improvements, new generating capacity, integration of renewables, energy storage, EE and demand response initiatives. The IRP process also helps evaluate potential environmental and regulatory scenarios to better mitigate policy and economic risks. The IRPs we file with regulators look out 10 to 20 years depending on the jurisdiction.
For a number of years, the Duke Energy Registrants have included a price on CO2 emissions in their IRP planning process to account for the potential regulation of CO2 emissions. Incorporating a price on CO2 emissions in the IRPs allows for the evaluation of existing and future resource needs against potential climate change policy risk in the absence of policy certainty. One of the challenges with using a CO2 price, especially in the absence of a clear and certain policy, is determining the appropriate price to use. To address this uncertainty and ensure the company remains agile, the Duke Energy Registrants typically use a range of potential CO2 prices to reflect a range of potential policy outcomes.
In September 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed their IRPs in North Carolina and South Carolina, and, in December 2021, Duke Energy Indiana filed its IRP, outlining an accelerated energy transition, which aligns with the company's 2030 CO2 emissions goal. In December 2021, the PSCSC rejected Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress’ preferred accelerated coal retirements IRP scenario and instead found that the base case without a price on CO2 emissions was the most reasonable IRP scenario.
In 2021, the state of North Carolina passed HB 951, which among other things, directs the NCUC to develop and approve a carbon reduction plan by the end of 2022 that would target a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from Duke Energy Progress' and Duke Energy Carolinas' electric generation in the state by 2030 and carbon neutrality by 2050, considering all resource options and the latest technology. In light of this legislation, in November 2021, the NCUC declined to make a determination on the portfolios presented in the 2020 IRP noting that the legislation may impact the schedule for coal plant retirements and new resources and limited its order to short-term actions for use on an interim basis pending preparation of the carbon plan. The NCUC approved its initial carbon reduction plan in December 2022, which considered feedback from extensive stakeholder engagement and was informed by Duke Energy's initial proposed carbon plan, filed with the NCUC on May 16, 2022, and built on the IRPs that were filed in 2020 by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress.
CO2 and Methane Emissions Reductions from the Natural Gas Distribution Business
In addition to CO2 emissions resulting primarily from our operations of coal-fired and natural gas-fired power plants, the Duke Energy Registrants are also responsible for certain methane emissions from the distribution of natural gas to customers. In October 2020, Duke Energy announced a new goal to achieve net-zero methane emissions from its natural gas distribution business by 2030. The Duke Energy Registrants have taken actions that have resulted in methane emission reductions, including the replacement of cast iron and bare steel pipelines and associated services with plastic or coated steel, advanced methane leak detection efforts, reducing time to repair nonhazardous leaks and operational releases of methane, and investment in renewable natural gas.
Timelines and initiatives, as well as implementation of new technologies, for future reductions of upstream methane emissions will vary in each state in which the company’s natural gas distribution business operates and will involve collaboration with regulators, customers and other stakeholders. EPA has also proposed regulations that would require reduction of methane emissions upstream of the Duke Energy Registrants' natural gas distribution business. The impact of these regulations on natural gas fuel prices is not currently quantifiable.
In addition to possible EPA regulation of methane emissions, certain local governments, none within the jurisdictions in which the Duke Energy Registrants operate, have enacted or are considering initiatives to eliminate natural gas use in new buildings and focus on electrification. Enactment of similar regulations in the areas in which the Duke Energy Registrants' natural gas distribution operates could have a significant impact on the natural gas distribution business and its operations. At this time, such impacts are not able to be quantified; however, the net-zero methane goals announced in 2020 for the natural gas distribution business, as well as the actions taken to reduce these GHG emissions, potentially lowers the exposure to any future mandatory GHG emission reduction requirements. The Duke Energy Registrants would plan to seek recovery of their compliance costs with any new regulations through the regulatory process.
Physical Impacts of Climate Change
The Duke Energy Registrants recognize that scientists associate severe weather events with increasing levels of GHGs in the atmosphere. It is possible that these weather events could have a material impact on future results of operations should they occur more frequently and with greater severity. However, the uncertain nature of potential changes in extreme weather events (such as increased frequency, duration and severity), the long period of time over which any potential changes might take place and the inability to predict potential changes with any degree of accuracy, make estimating with any certainty any potential future financial risk to the Duke Energy Registrants’ operations difficult. Additionally, the Duke Energy Registrants would plan to continue to seek recovery of storm costs through the appropriate regulatory mechanisms. For more information on storm securitization in North Carolina and storm cost recovery in Florida, see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, "Regulatory Matters."
The Duke Energy Registrants routinely take steps to reduce the potential impact of severe weather events on their electric transmission and distribution systems byand natural gas facilities. The steps include modernizing the electric grid through smart meters, storm hardening, self-healing systems and targeted undergrounding and applying lessons learned from previous storms to restoration efforts. The Duke Energy Registrants’ electric generating facilities and natural gas facilities are designed to withstand extreme weather events without significant damage. The Duke Energy Registrants maintain an inventoryinventories of coal, oil and oil on-siteliquified natural gas to mitigate the effects of any potential short-term disruption in fuel supply so they can continue to provide customers with an uninterrupted supply of electricity.electricity and/or natural gas.
State Legislation
66

In July 2017, the North Carolina General Assembly passed House Bill 589, and it was subsequently signed into law by the governor. The law includes, among other things, overall reform of the application of PURPA for new solar projects in the state, a requirement for the utility to procure approximately 2,600 MW of renewable energy through a competitive bidding process and recovery of costs related to the competitive bidding process through the fuel clause and a competitive procurement rider.
MD&AOTHER MATTERS
In accordance with the provisions of HB 589, total procurement was changed based upon how much generation with no economic dispatch or curtailment occurs over the procurement period. Most of this type of generation is solar procured under PURPA. Based upon the current forecasted amount of such generation that will occur over procurement period, Duke Energy estimates the total under HB 589 competitive procurement will be approximately 1,500 to 2,000 MW.
Based on an independent evaluation process, Duke Energy will own or purchase a total of 551 MW of renewable energy from projects under the North Carolina’s CPRE program. The process used was approved by the NCUC to select projects that would deliver the lowest cost renewable energy for customers. Five Duke Energy projects, totaling about 190 MW, were selected during the competitive bidding process. Duke Energy has completed the contracting process for the winning projects. A second tranche for CPRE opened in October 2019 and bids are due by March 9, 2020; the current target date for execution of the contracts is the fourth quarter of 2020.
In various states, legislation is being considered to allow third-party sales of electricity. Deregulation or restructuring in the electric industry may result in increased competition and unrecovered costs. The Duke Energy Registrants cannot predict the outcome of these initiatives.
New Accounting Standards
See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies,” for a discussion of the impact of new accounting standards.
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Results of Operations and Financial Condition – Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.”

67
75




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Duke Energy
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Duke Energy Carolinas
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Progress Energy
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Duke Energy Progress
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Duke Energy Florida
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Duke Energy Ohio
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Duke Energy Indiana
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity
Piedmont
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity

7668




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2 – Acquisitions and Dispositions
Note 3 – Business Segments
Note 4 – Regulatory Matters
Note 5 – Commitments and Contingencies
Note 6 – Leases
Note 7 – Debt and Credit Facilities
Note 8 – Guarantees and Indemnifications
Note 9 – Joint Ownership of Generating and Transmission Facilities
Note 10 – Asset Retirement Obligations
Note 11 – Property, Plant and Equipment
Note 12 – Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Note 13 – Investments in Unconsolidated Affiliates
Note 14 – Related Party Transactions
Note 15 – Derivatives and Hedging
Note 16 – Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
Note 17 – Fair Value Measurements
Note 18 – Variable Interest Entities
Note 19 – Revenue
Note 20 – Stockholders' Equity
Note 21 – Severance
Note 22 – Stock-Based Compensation
Note 23 – Employee Benefit Plans
Note 24 – Income Taxes
Note 25 – Other Income and Expenses, Net
Note 26 – Subsequent Events
Note 27 – Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)

77
69





REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Corporation
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 20, 2020,27, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinionsopinion on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Investment in Unconsolidated Affiliates - Equity Method Investments -Dispositions – Assessment of Held for Sale and Discontinued Operations Classification and Impairment Charge – Refer to Notes 4 and 13Note 2 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
Investments in affiliates that are not controlled byIn November 2022, Duke Energy committed to a plan to sell the Company but over whichCommercial Renewables business segment, excluding the Company has significant influence are accountedoffshore wind contract for usingCarolina Long Bay (“Commercial Renewables business segment”). As a result, the equity methodCommercial Renewables business segment was classified as held for sale and reported as discontinued operations and pretax impairment charges of accounting. Equity method investments are assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate thatapproximately $1.7 billion were recorded to reduce the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the decline in value is consideredassets to be other than temporary, the investment is written down to itstheir estimated fair value, which establishes a new cost basis in the investment.
At December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the equity method investment in Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (ACP) was $1.2 billion. ACP has received several adverse court rulings, and as a result, the Company evaluated this investment for impairment. The Company has determined that fair value approximates carrying value and, therefore, concluded the investment is not impaired. The Company used probability-weighted outcome scenarios of discounted future cash flows to estimate the fair value of the investment. The use of probability-weighted, discounted cash flows requires management to make significant estimates regarding the likelihood of various scenarios, the key assumptions including total construction cost and revenues, and the discount rate utilized to determine the fair value estimate. Changes in these assumptions could have a significant impactbased on the fair value estimate, which is usedexpected selling price less cost to determine the amount of any impairment.sell.
We identified the assessment of held for sale and discontinued operations classification and associated impairment evaluation of ACPcharges as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimatesextensive effort required to audit the subjective and assumptions management makes related tocomplex judgments associated with those matters, including:
The assessment of whether the probability-weighted, discounted cash flows. The audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions related to the likelihood of various scenarios, the key assumptions including total construction cost and revenues,sale is probable and the discount rate requiredtransfer of assets will be completed within one year from period-end;
The assessment of whether the sale of the segment represents a high degreediscontinued operation;
The determination of auditor judgementthe impairment charges; and an increased extent
The assessment of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.of the Commercial Renewables business segment.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the discounted, probability-weighted forecastsclassification of future cash flowsthe Commercial Renewables business segment as held for sale and the associated impairment charges included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over (1) the evaluation and disclosure of the held for sale and discontinued operations classification and (2) the determination of the impairment charges, including controls over the reasonableness of the inputs and assumptions used in management’s estimates.
We evaluated management’s assessment of held for sale and discontinued operations classification as follows:
Inquired of executive officers, key members of management and members of the Board of Directors to obtain an understanding of plans to sell the Commercial Renewables business segment.
70

REPORTS
Assessed management’s judgments in determining whether the Commercial Renewables business segment meets the held for sale and discontinued operations classification criteria through procedures performed, including, but not limited to, reviewing minutes from meetings of the Board of Directors, reviewing communications regarding the progression of the selling process, and assessing the Commercial Renewables business segment relative to the Company’s operations and financial results.
Compared management’s conclusions against relevant guidance and tested the completeness and accuracy of information used in the Company’s evaluation.
We evaluated the reasonableness of the determination of the fair value of the ACP equity method investment, included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of controls over the accounting for the ACP equity method investment, including those over the development of thelong-lived assets by using an internal fair value estimate.
We evaluated the likelihood of the various outcomes used by managementspecialist to develop the probability-weighted scenarios of future cash flows by:

78




REPORTS


Obtaining letters and making inquiries from the ACP’s internal and external legal counsel regarding likely outcomes of future court rulings
Reading information included in the Company’s and the project manager’s press releases, regulatory filings and orders, legal briefs and orders, and analyst and industry reports
Reading internal communications to management and the Board of Directors
Comparing the various scenarios to scenarios previously developed by management
We evaluatedassess the reasonableness of the key assumptions used to develop the scenarios of future cash flows by comparing key assumptions to:
Internal communications and schedules to management and the Board of Directors
Information included in the Company’s and the project manager’s press releases, regulatory filings and related orders
Industry reports and external transaction data
Executed contracts and invoices
With the assistance of our fair value specialists,overall methodology and discount rates. Additionally, we evaluated the reasonablenessmathematical accuracy of the (1) valuation methodology and (2) discount rateunderlying calculations. Further, we tested forecasted information used to developdetermine fair value.
We evaluated the fair value estimate by:accuracy and completeness of the Company's reclassification of balances and activity and related disclosures.
Determining the appropriateness of the valuation methodology by comparing management’s methodology to generally accepted valuation practice
Testing the mathematical accuracy of the fair value estimate
Testing the source information underlying the determination of the discount rate
Developing a range of independent estimates of the discount rate and comparing those to the discount rate selected by management
We obtained representation from management asserting to the appropriate presentation, measurement and timing of the Commercial Renewables business segment.
Regulatory Matters - Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements - Refer to Notes 1, 4 and 10 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to regulation by federal and state utility regulatory agencies (the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the rates of the Company’s electric and natural gas distribution companies. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As discussed in Note 4, regulatory proceedings in recent years have focused on the recoverability of storm costs, fuel costs, and asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash. As a result, assessing the potential outcomes of future regulatory orders requires significant management judgment. As of December 31, 2019,2022, the Company has $15approximately $18.1 billion of recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions,Commissions; to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. As such,Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities a high degree of auditor judgment, and an increased extent of effort.as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter WasMatters Were Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of the recovery in future rates of regulatory assets and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedenceprecedents of the Commission’sCommissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We also evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commissions, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances for completeness.by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
71

REPORTS
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commissions that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We performed audit procedures on the incurred costs requested for recovery to confirm their completeness and accuracy.
We obtained an analysis from management and letters from internal and external legal counsel as appropriate,for asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash costs, regarding probability of recovery for regulatory assetsdeferred costs not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 2020 

27, 2023 
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1947.

72

79




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions, except per share amounts)202220212020
Operating Revenues     Operating Revenues
Regulated electric$22,615
 $22,097
 $21,177
Regulated electric$25,759 $22,319 $21,461 
Regulated natural gas1,759
 1,773
 1,734
Regulated natural gas2,724 2,008 1,642 
Nonregulated electric and other705
 651
 654
Nonregulated electric and other285 294 263 
Total operating revenues25,079
 24,521
 23,565
Total operating revenues28,768 24,621 23,366 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power6,826
 6,831
 6,350
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power8,782 6,255 6,051 
Cost of natural gas627
 697
 632
Cost of natural gas1,276 705 460 
Operation, maintenance and other6,066
 6,463
 5,944
Operation, maintenance and other5,734 5,703 5,502 
Depreciation and amortization4,548
 4,074
 3,527
Depreciation and amortization5,086 4,762 4,504 
Property and other taxes1,307
 1,280
 1,233
Property and other taxes1,466 1,355 1,311 
Impairment charges(8) 402
 282
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges434 353 978 
Total operating expenses19,366
 19,747
 17,968
Total operating expenses22,778 19,133 18,806 
(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net(4) (89) 28
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, netGains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net22 12 11 
Operating Income5,709
 4,685
 5,625
Operating Income6,012 5,500 4,571 
Other Income and Expenses     Other Income and Expenses
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates162
 83
 119
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliatesEquity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates113 62 (2,005)
Other income and expenses, net430
 399
 508
Other income and expenses, net392 636 451 
Total other income and expenses592
 482
 627
Total other income and expenses505 698 (1,554)
Interest Expense2,204
 2,094
 1,986
Interest Expense2,439 2,207 2,097 
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes4,097
 3,073
 4,266
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes4,078 3,991 920 
Income Tax Expense From Continuing Operations519
 448
 1,196
Income Tax Expense (Benefit) From Continuing OperationsIncome Tax Expense (Benefit) From Continuing Operations300 268 (169)
Income From Continuing Operations3,578
 2,625
 3,070
Income From Continuing Operations3,778 3,723 1,089 
(Loss) Income From Discontinued Operations, net of tax(7) 19
 (6)
Loss From Discontinued Operations, net of taxLoss From Discontinued Operations, net of tax(1,323)(144)(7)
Net Income3,571
 2,644
 3,064
Net Income2,455 3,579 1,082 
Less: Net (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests(177) (22) 5
Add: Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling InterestsAdd: Net Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests95 329 295 
Net Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation3,748
 2,666
 3,059
Net Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation2,550 3,908 1,377 
Less: Preferred Dividends41
 
 
Less: Preferred Dividends106 106 107 
Net Income Available to Duke Energy Corporation Common Stockholders$3,707
 $2,666
 $3,059
Net Income Available to Duke Energy Corporation Common Stockholders$2,444 $3,802 $1,270 
     
Earnings Per Share Basic and Diluted
     
Earnings Per Share Basic and Diluted
Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders     Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
Basic and Diluted$5.07
 $3.73
 $4.37
Basic and Diluted$4.74 $4.68 $1.33 
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
    (Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
Basic and Diluted$(0.01) $0.03
 $(0.01)Basic and Diluted$(1.57)$0.26 $0.39 
Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
    Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders
Basic and Diluted$5.06
 $3.76
 $4.36
Basic and Diluted$3.17 $4.94 $1.72 
Weighted average shares outstanding     Weighted average shares outstanding
Basic and Diluted729
 708
 700
BasicBasic770 769 737 
DilutedDiluted770 769 738 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

73
80




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)  
2019
 2018
 2017
Net Income$3,571
 $2,644
 $3,064
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax(a)
     
Pension and OPEB adjustments9
 (6) 3
Net unrealized (losses) gains on cash flow hedges(47) (10) 2
Reclassification into earnings from cash flow hedges6
 6
 8
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities8
 (3) 13
Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income, net of tax  
(24) (13) 26
Comprehensive Income  
3,547
 2,631
 3,090
Less: Comprehensive (Loss) Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests  
(177) (22) 5
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation3,724
 2,653
 3,085
Less: Preferred Dividends41
 
 
Comprehensive Income Available to Duke Energy Corporation Common Stockholders$3,683
 $2,653
 $3,085

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Net Income$2,455 $3,579 $1,082 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax(a)
Pension and OPEB adjustments(19)
Net unrealized gains (losses) on cash flow hedges285 (68)(138)
Reclassification into earnings from cash flow hedges(38)13 11 
Net unrealized losses on fair value hedges(33)— — 
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities(21)(8)
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax174 (56)(118)
Comprehensive Income2,629 3,523 964 
Add: Comprehensive Loss Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests84 319 306 
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Duke Energy Corporation2,713 3,842 1,270 
Less: Preferred Dividends106 106 107 
Comprehensive Income Available to Duke Energy Corporation Common Stockholders$2,607 $3,736 $1,163 
(a)     Tax impacts are insignificantNet of income tax expense of approximately $52 million for all periods presented.the year ended December 31, 2022, and income tax benefit of approximately $17 million and $35 million for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, respectively.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

74
81

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
ASSETS   
Current Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$311
 $442
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $22 at 2019 and $16 at 2018)1,066
 962
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $54 at 2019 and $55 at 2018)1,994
 2,172
Inventory3,232

3,084
Regulatory assets (includes $52 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)1,796
 2,005
Other (includes $242 at 2019 and $162 at 2018 related to VIEs)764
 1,049
Total current assets9,163
 9,714
Property, Plant and Equipment   
Cost147,654
 134,458
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(45,773) (43,126)
Generation facilities to be retired, net246
 362
Net property, plant and equipment102,127
 91,694
Other Noncurrent Assets   
Goodwill19,303
 19,303
Regulatory assets (includes $989 at 2019 and $1,041 at 2018 related to VIEs)13,222
 13,617
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds8,140
 6,720
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net1,658
 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates1,936
 1,409
Other (includes $110 at 2019 and $261 at 2018 related to VIEs)3,289
 2,935
Total other noncurrent assets47,548
 43,984
Total Assets$158,838
 $145,392
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Current Liabilities   
Accounts payable$3,487
 $3,487
Notes payable and commercial paper3,135
 3,410
Taxes accrued392
 577
Interest accrued565
 559
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $216 at 2019 and $227 at 2018 related to VIEs)3,141
 3,406
Asset retirement obligations881
 919
Regulatory liabilities784
 598
Other2,367
 2,085
Total current liabilities14,752
 15,041
Long-Term Debt (includes $3,997 at 2019 and $3,998 at 2018 related to VIEs)54,985
 51,123
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   
Deferred income taxes8,878
 7,806
Asset retirement obligations12,437
 9,548
Regulatory liabilities15,264
 14,834
Operating lease liabilities1,432
 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs934
 988
Investment tax credits624
 568
Other (includes $228 at 2019 and $212 at 2018 related to VIEs)1,581
 1,650
Total other noncurrent liabilities41,150
 35,394
Commitments and Contingencies


 


Equity   
Preferred stock, Series A, $0.001 par value, 40 million depositary shares authorized and outstanding at 2019973
 
Preferred stock, Series B, $0.001 par value, 1 million shares authorized and outstanding at 2019989
 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 2 billion shares authorized; 733 million shares outstanding at 2019 and 727 million shares outstanding at 20181
 1
Additional paid-in capital40,881
 40,795
Retained earnings4,108
 3,113
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(130) (92)
Total Duke Energy Corporation stockholders' equity46,822
 43,817
Noncontrolling interests1,129
 17
Total equity47,951
 43,834
Total Liabilities and Equity$158,838
 $145,392

December 31,
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$409 $341 
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 at 2022 and $45 at 2021)1,309 1,085 
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $176 at 2022 and $76 at 2021)3,106 2,437 
Inventory3,584 3,111 
Regulatory assets (includes $106 at 2022 and $105 at 2021 related to VIEs)3,485 2,150 
Assets held for sale262 232 
Other (includes $116 at 2022 and $41 at 2021 related to VIEs)1,067 584 
Total current assets13,222 9,940 
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost163,839 154,496 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(52,100)(49,104)
Facilities to be retired, net9 144 
Net property, plant and equipment111,748 105,536 
Other Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill19,303 19,303 
Regulatory assets (includes $1,715 at 2022 and $1,824 at 2021 related to VIEs)14,645 12,487 
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds8,637 10,401 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net1,042 1,136 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates455 457 
Assets held for sale5,634 6,695 
Other (includes $52 at 2022 and $30 at 2021 related to VIEs)3,400 3,632 
Total other noncurrent assets53,116 54,111 
Total Assets$178,086 $169,587 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable$4,754 $3,531 
Notes payable and commercial paper3,952 3,304 
Taxes accrued722 731 
Interest accrued626 530 
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $350 at 2022 and $76 at 2021 related to VIEs)4,154 3,387 
Asset retirement obligations773 647 
Regulatory liabilities1,466 1,211 
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale259 167 
Other2,167 2,423 
Total current liabilities18,873 15,931 
Long-Term Debt (includes $3,108 at 2022 and $3,379 at 2021 related to VIEs)67,061 60,448 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes9,964 9,379 
Asset retirement obligations11,955 11,953 
Regulatory liabilities13,582 16,152 
Operating lease liabilities876 940 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs832 855 
Investment tax credits849 833 
Liabilities associated with assets held for sale739 612 
Other1,502 1,348 
Total other noncurrent liabilities40,299 42,072 
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Preferred stock, Series A, $0.001 par value, 40 million depositary shares authorized and outstanding at 2022 and 2021973 973 
Preferred stock, Series B, $0.001 par value, 1 million shares authorized and outstanding at 2022 and 2021989 989 
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 2 billion shares authorized; 770 million and 769 million shares outstanding at 2022 and 20211 
Additional paid-in capital44,862 44,371 
Retained earnings2,637 3,265 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(140)(303)
Total Duke Energy Corporation stockholders' equity49,322 49,296 
Noncontrolling interests2,531 1,840 
Total equity51,853 51,136 
Total Liabilities and Equity$178,086 $169,587 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

75
82

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$2,455 $3,579 $1,082 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (including amortization of nuclear fuel)5,843 5,663 5,486 
Equity in (earnings) losses of unconsolidated affiliates(114)(28)2,005 
Equity component of AFUDC(197)(171)(154)
Impairment of assets and other charges2,183 356 984 
Deferred income taxes(200)191 54 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(58)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(584)(540)(610)
Provision for rate refunds(130)(70)(22)
Refund of AMT credit carryforwards — 572 
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions19 50 63 
Receivables(788)(297)(56)
Inventory(476)(34)66 
Other current assets(a)
(1,498)(1,136)205 
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable805 249 (21)
Taxes accrued10 284 117 
Other current liabilities(153)(13)(65)
Other assets(a)
(1,600)112 (408)
Other liabilities410 95 (442)
Net cash provided by operating activities5,927 8,290 8,856 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures(11,367)(9,715)(9,907)
Contributions to equity method investments(58)(81)(370)
Return of investment capital6 44 133 
Purchases of debt and equity securities(4,243)(6,098)(8,011)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities4,333 6,103 7,949 
Disbursements to canceled equity method investments (855)— 
Other(644)(333)(398)
Net cash used in investing activities(11,973)(10,935)(10,604)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the:
Issuance of long-term debt11,874 9,052 6,330 
Issuance of common stock9 2,745 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(4,396)(5,294)(4,506)
Proceeds from the issuance of short-term debt with original maturities greater than 90 days80 332 3,009 
Payments for the redemption of short-term debt with original maturities greater than 90 days(287)(997)(2,147)
Notes payable and commercial paper781 1,144 (1,181)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests1,377 1,575 426 
Dividends paid(3,179)(3,114)(2,812)
Other(130)(94)(133)
Net cash provided by financing activities6,129 2,609 1,731 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash83 (36)(17)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period520 556 573 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$603 $520 $556 
Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$2,361 $2,248 $2,186 
Cash received from income taxes(6)(3)(585)
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures1,766 1,325 1,116 
Non-cash dividends — 110 
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     
Net income$3,571
 $2,644
 $3,064
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (including amortization of nuclear fuel)5,176
 4,696
 4,046
Equity component of AFUDC(139) (221) (237)
Losses (Gains) on sales of other assets4
 88
 (33)
Impairment charges(8) 402
 282
Deferred income taxes806
 1,079
 1,433
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates(162) (83) (119)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs24
 61
 8
Contributions to qualified pension plans(77) (141) (19)
Payments for asset retirement obligations(746) (533) (571)
Payment for the disposal of other assets
 (105) 
Provision for rate refunds60
 425
 
Refund of AMT credit carryforwards573
 
 
(Increase) decrease in     
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions(48) 22
 18
Receivables78
 (345) (83)
Inventory(122) 156
 268
Other current assets10
 (721) (400)
Increase (decrease) in     
Accounts payable(164) 479
 (204)
Taxes accrued(224) 23
 149
Other current liabilities172
 270
 (482)
Other assets(520) (971) (436)
Other liabilities(55) (39) (60)
Net cash provided by operating activities8,209

7,186

6,624
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     
Capital expenditures(11,122) (9,389) (8,052)
Contributions to equity method investments(324) (416) (414)
Return of investment capital11
 137
 281
Purchases of debt and equity securities(3,348) (3,762) (4,071)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities3,343
 3,747
 4,098
Other(517) (377) (284)
Net cash used in investing activities(11,957)
(10,060)
(8,442)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     
Proceeds from the:     
Issuance of long-term debt7,091
 5,299
 6,909
Issuance of preferred stock1,962
 
 
Issuance of common stock384
 1,838
 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(3,476) (2,906) (2,316)
Proceeds from the issuance of short-term debt with original maturities greater than 90 days397
 472
 319
Payments for the redemption of short-term debt with original maturities greater than 90 days(479) (282) (272)
Notes payable and commercial paper(298) 981
 (409)
Contributions from noncontrolling interests843
 41
 
Dividends paid(2,668) (2,471) (2,450)
Other(26) (12) 1
Net cash provided by financing activities3,730

2,960

1,782
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(18)
86

(36)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period591
 505
 541
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$573

$591

$505
Supplemental Disclosures:     
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$2,195
 $2,086
 $1,963
Cash (received from) paid for income taxes(651) (266) 4
Significant non-cash transactions:     
Accrued capital expenditures1,356
 1,112
 1,032
Non-cash dividends108
 107
 
(a)    Includes approximately $2.6 billion for impacts of under-collected deferred fuel regulatory assets for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

76
83

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS



DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Duke Energy Corporation Stockholders'
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Net UnrealizedTotal
Net GainsGains (Losses)Duke Energy
CommonAdditional(Losses)on Available-Pension andCorporation
PreferredStockCommonPaid-inRetainedonfor-Sale-OPEBStockholders'NoncontrollingTotal
(in millions)StockSharesStockCapitalEarnings
Hedges(d)
SecuritiesAdjustmentsEquityInterestsEquity
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,962 733 $$40,881 $4,108 $(51)$$(82)$46,822 $1,129 $47,951 
Net income (loss)— — — — 1,270 — — — 1,270 (295)975 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — — — — (116)(107)(11)(118)
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits— 36 — 2,902 — — — — 2,902 — 2,902 
Common stock dividends— — — — (2,815)— — — (2,815)— (2,815)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest(a)
— — — (17)— — — — (17)426 409 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries— — — — — — — — — (30)(30)
Other(b)
— — — (92)— — — (91)(90)
Balance at December 31, 2020$1,962 769 $$43,767 $2,471 $(167)$$(76)$47,964 $1,220 $49,184 
Net income (loss)— — — — 3,802 — — — 3,802 (329)3,473 
Other comprehensive (loss) income— — — — — (65)(8)(66)10 (56)
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits— — — 68 — — — — 68 — 68 
Common stock dividends— — — — (3,008)— — — (3,008)— (3,008)
Sale of noncontrolling interest(c)
— — — 545 — — — — 545 454 999 
Contribution from noncontrolling interest, net of transaction costs(a)
— — — — — — — — — 550 550 
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries— — — — — — — — — (66)(66)
Other— — — (9)— — — — (9)(8)
Balance at December 31, 2021$1,962 769 $$44,371 $3,265 $(232)$(2)$(69)$49,296 $1,840 $51,136 
Net income (loss)    2,444    2,444 (95)2,349 
Other comprehensive income (loss)     203 (21)(19)163 11 174 
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits 1  76     76  76 
Common stock dividends    (3,073)   (3,073) (3,073)
Sale of noncontrolling interest(c)
   465     465 569 1,034 
Purchase of noncontrolling interest   (51)    (51)31 (20)
Contribution from noncontrolling interest, net of transaction costs(a)
         314 314 
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries         (140)(140)
Other   1 1    2 1 3 
Balance at December 31, 2022$1,962 770 $1 $44,862 $2,637 $(29)$(23)$(88)$49,322 $2,531 $51,853 
         Duke Energy Corporation Stockholders'
Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
      
           Net Unrealized
   Total
    
         Net
 Gains (Losses)
   Duke Energy
    
  Common
   Additional
  Losses on
 on Available-
 Pension and
 Corporation
    
 Preferred
Stock
 Common
 Paid-in
 Retained
Cash Flow
 for-Sale-
 OPEB
 Stockholders'
 Noncontrolling
 Total
(in millions)Stock
Shares
 Stock
 Capital
 Earnings
Hedges
 Securities
 Adjustments
 Equity
 Interests
 Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016
700
 $1
 $38,741
 $2,384
$(20) $(1) $(72) $41,033
 $8
 $41,041
Net income

 
 
 3,059

 
 
 3,059
 5
 3,064
Other comprehensive income

 
 
 
10
 13
 3
 26
 
 26
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits

 
 51
 

 
 
 51
 
 51
Common stock dividends

 
 
 (2,450)
 
 
 (2,450) 
 (2,450)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 
 
 

 
 
 
 (2) (2)
Other(a)


 
 
 20

 
 
 20
 (13) 7
Balance at December 31, 2017
700

$1

$38,792

$3,013
$(10)
$12

$(69)
$41,739

$(2)
$41,737
Net income

 
 
 2,666

 
 
 2,666
 (22) 2,644
Other comprehensive loss

 
 
 
(4) (3) (6) (13) 
 (13)
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits
27
 
 2,003
 

 
 
 2,003
 
 2,003
Common stock dividends

 
 
 (2,578)
 
 
 (2,578) 
 (2,578)
Distributions to noncontrolling interest in subsidiaries

 
 
 

 
 
 
 (1) (1)
Other(b)


 
 
 12

 (12) 
 
 42
 42
Balance at December 31, 2018
727

$1

$40,795

$3,113
$(14)
$(3)
$(75)
$43,817

$17

$43,834
Net income

 
 
 3,707

 
 
 3,707
 (177) 3,530
Other comprehensive (loss) income

 
 
 
(41) 8
 9
 (24) 
 (24)
Preferred stock, Series A, issuances, net of issuance costs(c)
973

 
 
 

 
 
 973
 
 973
Preferred stock, Series B, issuances, net of issuance costs(d)
989

 
 
 

 
 
 989
 
 989
Common stock issuances, including dividend reinvestment and employee benefits
6
 
 552
 

 
 
 552
 
 552
Common stock dividends

 
 
 (2,735)
 
 
 (2,735) 
 (2,735)
Sale of noncontrolling interest(e)


 
 (466) 
10
 
 
 (456) 863
 407
Contribution from noncontrolling interest   
 
 
 

 
 
 
 428
 428
Distributions to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries

 
 
 

 
 
 
 (4) (4)
Other(f)


 
 
 23
(6) (2) (16) (1) 2
 1
Balance at December 31, 20191,962
733
 $1
 $40,881
 $4,108
$(51) $3
 $(82) $46,822
 $1,129
 $47,951
(a)     Relates to tax equity financing activity in the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
(b)    Amounts in Retained earnings primarily represent impacts due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Current Estimated Credit Losses. See Note 1 for additional discussion.
(c)     Relates primarily to the sale of a noncontrolling interest in Duke Energy Indiana. See Note 2 for additional discussion.
(d)    See Duke Energy Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for detailed activity related to Cash Flow and Fair Value Hedges.

(a)Retained Earnings relates to a cumulative-effect adjustment due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to stock-based compensation and the associated income taxes. See Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information. Noncontrolling Interests relates to the purchase of remaining interest in REC Solar.
(b)Amounts in Retained Earnings and AOCI represent a cumulative-effect adjustment due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Financial Instruments Classification and Measurement. See Note 1 for more information. Amount in Noncontrolling Interests primarily relates to tax equity financing activity in the Commercial Renewables segment.
(c)Duke Energy issued 40 million depositary shares of preferred stock, series A, in the first quarter of 2019.
(d)Duke Energy issued 1 million shares of preferred stock, series B, in the third quarter of 2019.
(e)See Note 3 for additional discussion of the transaction.
(f)Amounts in Retained Earnings and AOCI primarily represent impacts to accumulated other comprehensive income due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

77
84




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1, 4 and 10 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the North Carolina Utilities Commission and by the South Carolina Public Service Commission (collectively the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As discussed in Note 4, regulatory proceedings in recent years have focused on the recoverability of storm costs, fuel costs, and asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash. As a result, assessing the potential outcomes of future regulatory orders requires significant management judgment. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $5.4 billion recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of the recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by intervenors, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
78

REPORTS
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commission, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained an analysis from management and letters from internal legal counsel for asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash costs, regarding probability of recovery for deferred costs not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1947.

79

85




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues$7,395
 $7,300
 $7,302
Operating Revenues$7,857 $7,102 $7,015 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power1,804

1,821
 1,822
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,015 1,601 1,682 
Operation, maintenance and other1,868

2,130
 2,021
Operation, maintenance and other1,892 1,833 1,743 
Depreciation and amortization1,388

1,201
 1,090
Depreciation and amortization1,526 1,468 1,462 
Property and other taxes292

295
 281
Property and other taxes340 320 299 
Impairment charges17

192
 
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges26 227 476 
Total operating expenses5,369
 5,639
 5,214
Total operating expenses5,799 5,449 5,662 
(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 (1) 1
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, netGains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net4 
Operating Income2,026
 1,660
 2,089
Operating Income2,062 1,655 1,354 
Other Income and Expenses, net151
 153
 199
Other Income and Expenses, net221 270 177 
Interest Expense463
 439
 422
Interest Expense557 538 487 
Income Before Income Taxes1,714
 1,374
 1,866
Income Before Income Taxes1,726 1,387 1,044 
Income Tax Expense311
 303
 652
Income Tax Expense126 51 88 
Net Income$1,403
 $1,071
 $1,214
Net Income$1,600 $1,336 $956 
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax     Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax   
Reclassification into earnings from cash flow hedges
 1
 2
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedgesNet unrealized gain on cash flow hedges — 
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax
 1
 2
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax — 
Comprehensive Income$1,403
 $1,072
 $1,216
Comprehensive Income$1,600 $1,337 $956 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

80
86




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 December 31, December 31,
(in millions) 2019
 2018
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS    ASSETS  
Current Assets    Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents $18
 $33
Cash and cash equivalents$44 $
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and $2 at 2018) 324
 219
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 at 2019 and 2018) 642
 699
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2022 and $1 at 2021)Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2022 and $1 at 2021)338 300 
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $65 at 2022 and $41 at 2021)Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $65 at 2022 and $41 at 2021)928 844 
Receivables from affiliated companies 114
 182
Receivables from affiliated companies390 190 
Inventory 996

948
Inventory1,164 1,026 
Regulatory assets 550
 520
Other 21
 72
Regulatory assets (includes $12 at 2022 and 2021 related to VIEs)Regulatory assets (includes $12 at 2022 and 2021 related to VIEs)1,095 544 
Other (includes $8 at 2022 related to VIEs)Other (includes $8 at 2022 related to VIEs)216 95 
Total current assets 2,665
 2,673
Total current assets4,175 3,006 
Property, Plant and Equipment    Property, Plant and Equipment  
Cost 48,922
 44,741
Cost54,650 51,874 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization (16,525) (15,496)Accumulated depreciation and amortization(18,669)(17,854)
Facilities to be retired, netFacilities to be retired, net 102 
Net property, plant and equipment 32,397
 29,245
Net property, plant and equipment35,981 34,122 
Other Noncurrent Assets    Other Noncurrent Assets
Regulatory assets 3,360
 3,457
Regulatory assets (includes $208 at 2022 and $220 at 2021 related to VIEs)Regulatory assets (includes $208 at 2022 and $220 at 2021 related to VIEs)4,293 2,935 
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds 4,359
 3,558
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds4,783 5,759 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net 123
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net78 92 
Other 1,149
 1,027
Other1,036 1,248 
Total other noncurrent assets 8,991
 8,042
Total other noncurrent assets10,190 10,034 
Total Assets $44,053
 $39,960
Total Assets$50,346 $47,162 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY    LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Current Liabilities    Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable $954
 $988
Accounts payable$1,472 $988 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies 210
 230
Accounts payable to affiliated companies209 266 
Notes payable to affiliated companies 29
 439
Notes payable to affiliated companies1,233 226 
Taxes accrued 46
 171
Taxes accrued228 274 
Interest accrued 115
 102
Interest accrued120 125 
Current maturities of long-term debt 458
 6
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $10 at 2022 and $5 at 2021 related to VIEs)Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $10 at 2022 and $5 at 2021 related to VIEs)1,018 362 
Asset retirement obligations 206
 290
Asset retirement obligations261 249 
Regulatory liabilities 255
 199
Regulatory liabilities530 487 
Other 611
 571
Other580 546 
Total current liabilities 2,884
 2,996
Total current liabilities5,651 3,523 
Long-Term Debt 11,142
 10,633
Long-Term Debt (includes $689 at 2022 and $703 at 2021 related to VIEs)Long-Term Debt (includes $689 at 2022 and $703 at 2021 related to VIEs)12,948 12,595 
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies 300
 300
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies300 318 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities    Other Noncurrent Liabilities  
Deferred income taxes 3,921
 3,689
Deferred income taxes4,153 3,634 
Asset retirement obligations 5,528
 3,659
Asset retirement obligations5,121 5,052 
Regulatory liabilities 6,423
 5,999
Regulatory liabilities5,783 7,198 
Operating lease liabilities 102
 
Operating lease liabilities83 78 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs 84
 99
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs38 50 
Investment tax credits 231
 231
Investment tax credits300 287 
Other 627
 671
Other527 536 
Total other noncurrent liabilities 16,916
 14,348
Total other noncurrent liabilities16,005 16,835 
Commitments and Contingencies 

 

Commitments and Contingencies
Equity    Equity  
Member's equity 12,818
 11,689
Member's equity15,448 13,897 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (7) (6)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(6)(6)
Total equity 12,811
 11,683
Total equity15,442 13,891 
Total Liabilities and Equity $44,053
 $39,960
Total Liabilities and Equity$50,346 $47,162 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

81
87




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$1,403
 $1,071
 $1,214
Net income$1,600 $1,336 $956 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel)1,671
 1,487
 1,409
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel)1,787 1,743 1,731 
Equity component of AFUDC(42) (73) (106)Equity component of AFUDC(98)(65)(62)
Losses (Gains) on sales of other assets
 1
 (1)
Impairment charges17
 192
 
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges26 227 476 
Deferred income taxes133
 305
 410
Deferred income taxes210 (213)(260)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs(5) 4
 (4)
Contributions to qualified pension plans(7) (46) 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(15)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(278) (230) (271)Payments for asset retirement obligations(200)(182)(162)
Provision for rate refunds36
 182
 
Provision for rate refunds(74)(46)(5)
(Increase) decrease in
    (Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions(8) 2
 9
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions — (4)
Receivables(21) (86) (9)Receivables(102)(99)52 
Receivables from affiliated companies68
 (87) 68
Receivables from affiliated companies(200)(66)(10)
Inventory(48) 25
 78
Inventory(138)(16)(14)
Other current assets(73) (161) 7
Other current assets(a)
Other current assets(a)
(592)(309)209 
Increase (decrease) in
    Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable(50) 168
 23
Accounts payable377 55 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(20) 21
 (38)Accounts payable to affiliated companies(75)85 (11)
Taxes accrued(127) (65) 86
Taxes accrued(46)206 30 
Other current liabilities127
 89
 (161)Other current liabilities(91)(39)(56)
Other assets(31) (179) (49)
Other assets(a)
Other assets(a)
(764)21 (102)
Other liabilities(36) (90) (31)Other liabilities(36)116 (47)
Net cash provided by operating activities2,709
 2,530
 2,634
Net cash provided by operating activities1,569 2,704 2,776 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
    CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures(2,714) (2,706) (2,524)Capital expenditures(3,304)(2,693)(2,669)
Purchases of debt and equity securities(1,658) (1,810) (2,124)Purchases of debt and equity securities(2,633)(3,425)(1,602)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities1,658
 1,810
 2,128
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities2,633 3,425 1,602 
Notes receivable from affiliated companies
 
 66
Other(204) (147) (109)Other(181)(177)(164)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,918) (2,853) (2,563)Net cash used in investing activities(3,485)(2,870)(2,833)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt886
 1,983
 569
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt1,441 1,651 998 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(6) (1,205) (116)Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(436)(617)(813)
Notes payable to affiliated companies(410) 335
 104
Notes payable to affiliated companies1,007 (280)477 
Distributions to parent(275) (750) (625)Distributions to parent(50)(600)(600)
Other(1) (23) (1)Other(1)(1)(2)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities194
 340
 (69)
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(15) 17
 2
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period33
 16
 14
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$18
 $33
 $16
Net cash provided by financing activitiesNet cash provided by financing activities1,961 153 60 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashNet increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash45 (13)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period8 21 18 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$53 $$21 
Supplemental Disclosures:     Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$433
 $452
 $398
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$546 $508 $481 
Cash paid for income taxes122
 89
 193
Cash (received from) paid for income taxesCash (received from) paid for income taxes(60)233 321 
Significant non-cash transactions:     Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures347
 302
 315
Accrued capital expenditures475 359 365 
(a)    Includes approximately $1.3 billion for impacts of under-collected deferred fuel regulatory assets for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

82
88




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
  Accumulated Other  Accumulated Other
  Comprehensive    Comprehensive 
  Loss  Income (Loss)
  Net Gains
  Net Gains
  (Losses) on
  (Losses) on
Member's
 Cash Flow
 Total
Member'sCash FlowTotal
(in millions)Equity
 Hedges
 Equity
(in millions)EquityHedgesEquity
Balance at December 31, 2016$10,781
 $(9) $10,772
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 2019$12,818 $(7)$12,811 
Net incomeNet income956 — 956 
Distributions to parentDistributions to parent(600)— (600)
Other(a)
Other(a)
(13)— (13)
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020$13,161 $(7)$13,154 
Net income1,214
 
 1,214
Net income1,336 — 1,336 
Other comprehensive income
 2
 2
Other comprehensive income— 
Distributions to parent(625) 
 (625)Distributions to parent(600)— (600)
Other(2) 
 (2)
Balance at December 31, 2017$11,368
 $(7) $11,361
Balance at December 31, 2021Balance at December 31, 2021$13,897 $(6)$13,891 
Net income1,071
 
 1,071
Net income1,600  1,600 
Other comprehensive income
 1
 1
Distributions to parent(750) 
 (750)
Balance at December 31, 2018$11,689
 $(6) $11,683
Net income
1,403
 
 1,403
Distributions to parent
(275) 
 (275)Distributions to parent(50) (50)
Other1
 (1) 
Other1  1 
Balance at December 31, 2019$12,818
 $(7) $12,811
Balance at December 31, 2022Balance at December 31, 2022$15,448 $(6)$15,442 
(a)     Amounts primarily represent impacts due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Credit Losses. See Note 1 for additional discussion.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

83
89




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Progress Energy, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Progress Energy, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1, 4 and 10 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the North Carolina Utilities Commission, South Carolina Public Service Commission and Florida Public Service Commission (collectively the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As discussed in Note 4, regulatory proceedings in recent years have focused on the recoverability of storm costs, fuel costs, and asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash. As a result, assessing the potential outcomes of future regulatory orders requires significant management judgment. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $9 billion recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of the recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
84

REPORTS
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commissions, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained an analysis from management and letters from internal legal counsel for asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash costs, regarding probability of recovery for deferred costs not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1930.

85

90




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
Operating Revenues$11,202
 $10,728
 $9,783
Operating Expenses     
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power4,024
 3,976
 3,417
Operation, maintenance and other2,495
 2,613
 2,301
Depreciation and amortization1,845
 1,619
 1,285
Property and other taxes561
 529
 503
Impairment charges(24) 87
 156
Total operating expenses8,901

8,824

7,662
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 24
 26
Operating Income2,301

1,928

2,147
Other Income and Expenses, net141
 165
 209
Interest Expense862
 842
 824
Income Before Income Taxes1,580

1,251

1,532
Income Tax Expense253
 218
 264
Net Income1,327

1,033

1,268
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 6
 10
Net Income Attributable to Parent$1,327

$1,027

$1,258
      
Net Income  
$1,327

$1,033

$1,268
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax  
     
Pension and OPEB adjustments2
 5
 4
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges5
 6
 5
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities1
 (1) 4
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax  
8

10

13
Comprehensive Income  
1,335

1,043

1,281
Less: Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests
 6
 10
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Parent$1,335

$1,037

$1,271


 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues$13,125 $11,057 $10,627 
Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power5,078 3,584 3,479 
Operation, maintenance and other2,458 2,529 2,479 
Depreciation and amortization2,142 1,929 1,818 
Property and other taxes607 542 545 
Impairment of assets and other charges12 82 495 
Total operating expenses10,297 8,666 8,816 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net11 14 
Operating Income2,839 2,405 1,820 
Other Income and Expenses, net181 215 129 
Interest Expense844 794 790 
Income Before Income Taxes2,176 1,826 1,159 
Income Tax Expense348 227 113 
Net Income1,828 1,599 1,046 
Less: Net Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 
Net Income Attributable to Parent$1,828 $1,598 $1,045 
Net Income$1,828 $1,599 $1,046 
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax   
Pension and OPEB adjustments5 (1)
Net unrealized gain on cash flow hedges1 
Unrealized (losses) gains on available-for-sale securities(6)— (1)
Other Comprehensive Income, net of tax 
Comprehensive Income1,828 1,603 1,049 
Less: Comprehensive Income Attributable to Noncontrolling Interests 
Comprehensive Income Attributable to Parent$1,828 $1,602 $1,048 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

86
91

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS   ASSETS  
Current Assets   Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents$48
 $67
Cash and cash equivalents$108 $70 
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $7 at 2019 and $5 at 2018)220
 220
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $9 at 2019 and $8 at 2018)830
 909
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $13 at 2022 and $11 at 2021)Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $13 at 2022 and $11 at 2021)318 247 
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $68 at 2022 and $25 at 2021)Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $68 at 2022 and $25 at 2021)1,289 1,006 
Receivables from affiliated companies76
 168
Receivables from affiliated companies22 121 
Notes receivable from affiliated companies164
 
Inventory1,423

1,459
Inventory1,579 1,398 
Regulatory assets (includes $52 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)946
 1,137
Other (includes $39 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)210
 125
Regulatory assets (includes $94 at 2022 and $93 at 2021 related to VIEs)Regulatory assets (includes $94 at 2022 and $93 at 2021 related to VIEs)1,833 1,030 
Other (includes $88 at 2022 and $39 at 2021 related to VIEs)Other (includes $88 at 2022 and $39 at 2021 related to VIEs)342 125 
Total current assets3,917
 4,085
Total current assets5,491 3,997 
Property, Plant and Equipment   Property, Plant and Equipment  
Cost55,070
 50,260
Cost64,822 60,894 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(17,159) (16,398)Accumulated depreciation and amortization(20,584)(19,214)
Generation facilities to be retired, net246
 362
Facilities to be retired, netFacilities to be retired, net 26 
Net property, plant and equipment38,157
 34,224
Net property, plant and equipment44,238 41,706 
Other Noncurrent Assets   Other Noncurrent Assets  
Goodwill3,655
 3,655
Goodwill3,655 3,655 
Regulatory assets (includes $989 at 2019 and $1,041 at 2018 related to VIEs)6,346
 6,564
Regulatory assets (includes $1,507 at 2022 and $1,603 at 2021 related to VIEs)Regulatory assets (includes $1,507 at 2022 and $1,603 at 2021 related to VIEs)7,146 5,909 
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds3,782
 3,162
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds3,855 4,642 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net788
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net628 691 
Other1,049
 974
Other1,066 1,242 
Total other noncurrent assets15,620
 14,355
Total other noncurrent assets16,350 16,139 
Total Assets$57,694
 $52,664
Total Assets$66,079 $61,842 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Current Liabilities   Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable$1,104
 $1,172
Accounts payable$1,481 $1,099 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies310
 360
Accounts payable to affiliated companies712 506 
Notes payable to affiliated companies1,821
 1,235
Notes payable to affiliated companies843 2,809 
Taxes accrued46
 109
Taxes accrued135 128 
Interest accrued228
 246
Interest accrued206 192 
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $54 at 2019 and $53 at 2018 related to VIEs)1,577
 1,672
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $340 at 2022 and $71 at 2021 related to VIEs)Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $340 at 2022 and $71 at 2021 related to VIEs)697 1,082 
Asset retirement obligations485
 514
Asset retirement obligations289 275 
Regulatory liabilities330
 280
Regulatory liabilities576 478 
Other902
 821
Other782 868 
Total current liabilities6,803
 6,409
Total current liabilities5,721 7,437 
Long-Term Debt (includes $1,632 at 2019 and $1,636 at 2018 related to VIEs)17,907
 17,089
Long-Term Debt (includes $2,003 at 2022 and $2,293 at 2021 related to VIEs)Long-Term Debt (includes $2,003 at 2022 and $2,293 at 2021 related to VIEs)21,592 19,591 
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies150
 150
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies150 150 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   Other Noncurrent Liabilities  
Deferred income taxes4,462
 3,941
Deferred income taxes5,147 4,564 
Asset retirement obligations5,986
 4,897
Asset retirement obligations5,892 5,837 
Regulatory liabilities5,225
 5,049
Regulatory liabilities4,753 5,566 
Operating lease liabilities697
 
Operating lease liabilities546 606 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs488
 521
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs292 417 
Investment tax creditsInvestment tax credits358 364 
Other383
 351
Other222 162 
Total other noncurrent liabilities17,241
 14,759
Total other noncurrent liabilities17,210 17,516 
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments and Contingencies
Equity   Equity  
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2019 and 2018
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2022 and 2021Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2022 and 2021 — 
Additional paid-in capital9,143
 9,143
Additional paid-in capital11,832 9,149 
Retained earnings6,465
 5,131
Retained earnings9,585 8,007 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(18) (20)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(11)(11)
Total Progress Energy, Inc. stockholder's equity15,590
 14,254
Total Progress Energy, Inc. stockholder's equity21,406 17,145 
Noncontrolling interests3
 3
Noncontrolling interests 
Total equity15,593
 14,257
Total equity21,406 17,148 
Total Liabilities and Equity$57,694

$52,664
Total Liabilities and Equity$66,079 $61,842 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

87
92




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$1,327
 $1,033
 $1,268
Net income$1,828 $1,599 $1,046 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (including amortization of nuclear fuel)2,207
 1,987
 1,516
Depreciation, amortization and accretion (including amortization of nuclear fuel)2,405 2,302 2,327 
Equity component of AFUDC(66) (104) (92)Equity component of AFUDC(68)(51)(42)
Gains on sales of other assets
 (24) (28)
Impairment charges(24) 87
 156
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges12 82 495 
Deferred income taxes433
 358
 703
Deferred income taxes364 247 (197)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs20
 24
 (28)
Contributions to qualified pension plans(57) (45) 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(13)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(412) (230) (248)Payments for asset retirement obligations(291)(288)(384)
Provision for rate refunds15
 122
 
Provision for rate refunds(58)(36)
(Increase) decrease in     (Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions(34) 18
 
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions 51 (9)
Receivables47
 (207) (89)Receivables(322)(97)(69)
Receivables from affiliated companies81
 (137) 71
Receivables from affiliated companies117 18 (81)
Inventory62
 121
 125
Inventory(183)(26)49 
Other current assets184
 (12) (397)
Other current assets(a)
Other current assets(a)
(937)(551)223 
Increase (decrease) in     Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable(4) 217
 (260)Accounts payable222 59 (62)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(50) 109
 (97)Accounts payable to affiliated companies206 217 (21)
Taxes accrued(74) 8
 17
Taxes accrued8 13 75 
Other current liabilities25
 129
 (166)Other current liabilities96 (32)139 
Other assets(336) (876) (300)
Other assets(a)
Other assets(a)
(1,116)(110)(137)
Other liabilities(135) (34) (98)Other liabilities573 (99)(177)
Net cash provided by operating activities3,209

2,544

2,053
Net cash provided by operating activities2,843 3,298 3,177 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Capital expenditures(3,952) (3,854) (3,152)Capital expenditures(4,317)(3,668)(3,488)
Purchases of debt and equity securities(1,511) (1,753) (1,806)Purchases of debt and equity securities(1,341)(2,233)(5,998)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities1,504
 1,769
 1,824
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities1,417 2,322 6,010 
Notes receivable from affiliated companies(164) 240
 (160)Notes receivable from affiliated companies — 164 
Other(190) (162) (59)Other(137)(156)(160)
Net cash used in investing activities(4,313) (3,760) (3,353)Net cash used in investing activities(4,378)(3,735)(3,472)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt2,187
 1,833
 2,118
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt2,775 3,095 1,791 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(1,667) (771) (813)Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(1,173)(1,883)(2,157)
Notes payable to affiliated companies586
 430
 100
Notes payable to affiliated companies465 (160)1,148 
Dividends to parent
 (250) (124)Dividends to parent(425)(700)(400)
Other12
 (1) (4)Other(36)(2)(13)
Net cash provided by financing activities1,118

1,241

1,277
Net cash provided by financing activities1,606 350 369 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash14

25

(23)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period112
 87
 110
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$126
 $112
 $87
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashNet increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash71 (87)74 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period113 200 126 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$184 $113 $200 
Supplemental Disclosures:     Supplemental Disclosures:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$892
 $798
 $773
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$854 $813 $819 
Cash received from income taxes(79) (348) (146)
Cash paid for income taxesCash paid for income taxes79 14 149 
Significant non-cash transactions:     Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures447
 478
 391
Accrued capital expenditures663 501 363 
Equitization of certain notes payable to affiliates
 
 1,047
Dividend to parent related to a legal entity restructuring
 
 547
(a)    Includes approximately $1.3 billion for impacts of under-collected deferred fuel regulatory assets for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

88
93




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PROGRESS ENERGY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
 
  
 Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)  
  
  
  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)   
    Net Gains
 Net Unrealized
   Total Progress
    Net GainsNet UnrealizedTotal Progress
Additional
   (Losses) on
 Gains (Losses)
 Pension and
 Energy, Inc.
    Additional(Losses) onGains (Losses)Pension andEnergy, Inc.
Paid-in
 Retained
 Cash Flow
 on Available-for-
 OPEB
 Stockholder's
 Noncontrolling
 Total
Paid-inRetainedCash Flowon Available-for-OPEBStockholder'sNoncontrollingTotal
(in millions)Capital
 Earnings
 Hedges
 Sale Securities
 Adjustments
 Equity
 Interests
 Equity
(in millions)CapitalEarningsHedgesSale SecuritiesAdjustmentsEquityInterestsEquity
Balance at December 31, 2016$8,094
 $3,764
 $(23) $1
 $(16) $11,820
 $(13) $11,807
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 2019$9,143 $6,465 $(10)$(1)$(7)$15,590 $$15,593 
Net incomeNet income— 1,045 — — — 1,045 1,046 
Other comprehensive income (loss)Other comprehensive income (loss)— — (1)(1)— 
Dividends to parentDividends to parent— (400)— — — (400)— (400)
OtherOther— (1)— — — (1)— (1)
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020$9,143 $7,109 $(5)$(2)$(8)$16,237 $$16,241 
Net income
 1,258
 
 
 
 1,258
 10
 1,268
Net income— 1,598 — — — 1,598 1,599 
Other comprehensive income
 
 5
 4
 4
 13
 
 13
Other comprehensive income— — — — 
Dividends to parent(a)

 (672) 
 
 
 (672) 
 (672)
Equitization of certain notes payable to affiliates1,047
 
 
 
 
 1,047
 
 1,047
Distributions to noncontrolling interestsDistributions to noncontrolling interests— — — — — — (1)(1)
Dividends to parentDividends to parent— (700)— — — (700)— (700)
Other2
 
 
 
 
 2
 
 2
Other— — — — (1)
Balance at December 31, 2017$9,143

$4,350

$(18)
$5

$(12)
$13,468

$(3)
$13,465
Balance at December 31, 2021Balance at December 31, 2021$9,149 $8,007 $(2)$(2)$(7)$17,145 $$17,148 
Net income
 1,027
 
 
 
 1,027
 6
 1,033
Net income 1,828    1,828  1,828 
Other comprehensive income (loss)
 
 6
 (1) 5
 10
 
 10
Other comprehensive income (loss)  1 (6)5    
Distributions to noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 (1) (1)Distributions to noncontrolling interests      (34)(34)
Dividends to parent
 (250) 
 
 
 (250) 
 (250)Dividends to parent(175)(250)   (425) (425)
Other(b)

 4
 
 (5) 
 (1) 1
 
Balance at December 31, 2018$9,143

$5,131

$(12)
$(1)
$(7)
$14,254

$3

$14,257
Net income
 1,327
 
 
 
 1,327
 
 1,327
Other comprehensive income
 
 5
 1
 2
 8
 
 8
Other(c)

 7
 (3) (1) (2) 1
 
 1
Balance at December 31, 2019$9,143

$6,465

$(10)
$(1)
$(7)
$15,590

$3

$15,593
Equitization of certain notes payable to affiliatesEquitization of certain notes payable to affiliates2,907     2,907  2,907 
Purchase of a noncontrolling interestPurchase of a noncontrolling interest(51)    (51)31 (20)
OtherOther2     2  2 
Balance at December 31, 2022Balance at December 31, 2022$11,832 $9,585 $(1)$(8)$(2)$21,406 $ $21,406 

(a)Includes a $547 million non-cash dividend related to a legal entity restructuring.
(b)Amounts in Retained Earnings and AOCI represent a cumulative-effect adjustment due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Financial Instruments Classification and Measurement. See Note 1 for more information.
(c)Amounts in Retained Earnings and AOCI primarily represent impacts to accumulated other comprehensive income due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

89
94




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Progress, LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1, 4 and 10 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the North Carolina Utilities Commission and by the South Carolina Public Service Commission (collectively the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As discussed in Note 4, regulatory proceedings in recent years have focused on the recoverability of storm costs, fuel costs, and asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash. As a result, assessing the potential outcomes of future regulatory orders requires significant management judgment. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $5.4 billion recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of the recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
90

REPORTS
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commissions, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained an analysis from management and letters from internal legal counsel for asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash costs, regarding probability of recovery for deferred costs not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1930.

91

95




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
Operating Revenues$5,957
 $5,699
 $5,129
Operating Expenses     
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,012
 1,892
 1,609
Operation, maintenance and other1,446
 1,578
 1,439
Depreciation and amortization1,143
 991
 725
Property and other taxes176
 155
 156
Impairment charges12
 33
 19
Total operating expenses4,789
 4,649
 3,948
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 9
 4
Operating Income1,168
 1,059
 1,185
Other Income and Expenses, net100
 87
 115
Interest Expense306
 319
 293
Income Before Income Taxes962
 827
 1,007
Income Tax Expense157
 160
 292
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$805
 $667
 $715

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues$6,753 $5,780 $5,422 
Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,492 1,778 1,743 
Operation, maintenance and other1,475 1,467 1,332 
Depreciation and amortization1,187 1,097 1,116 
Property and other taxes190 159 167 
Impairment of assets and other charges7 63 499 
Total operating expenses5,351 4,564 4,857 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net4 13 
Operating Income1,406 1,229 573 
Other Income and Expenses, net114 143 75 
Interest Expense354 306 269 
Income Before Income Taxes1,166 1,066 379 
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)158 75 (36)
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$1,008 $991 $415 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

92
96

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS   ASSETS  
Current Assets   Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents$22
 $23
Cash and cash equivalents$49 $35 
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and $2 at 2018)123
 75
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $5 at 2019 and 2018)489
 547
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at 2022 and 2021)Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at 2022 and 2021)167 127 
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 at 2022 and $17 at 2021)Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $40 at 2022 and $17 at 2021)793 574 
Receivables from affiliated companies52
 23
Receivables from affiliated companies25 65 
Inventory934

954
Inventory1,006 921 
Regulatory assets526
 703
Other60
 62
Regulatory assets (includes $39 at 2022 and 2021 related to VIEs)Regulatory assets (includes $39 at 2022 and 2021 related to VIEs)690 533 
Other (includes $42 at 2022 related to VIEs)Other (includes $42 at 2022 related to VIEs)174 83 
Total current assets2,206
 2,387
Total current assets2,904 2,338 
Property, Plant and Equipment   Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost34,603
 31,459
Cost38,875 37,018 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(11,915) (11,423)Accumulated depreciation and amortization(14,201)(13,387)
Generation facilities to be retired, net246
 362
Facilities to be retired, netFacilities to be retired, net 26 
Net property, plant and equipment22,934
 20,398
Net property, plant and equipment24,674 23,657 
Other Noncurrent Assets   Other Noncurrent Assets
Regulatory assets4,152
 4,111
Regulatory assets (includes $681 at 2022 and $720 at 2021 related to VIEs)Regulatory assets (includes $681 at 2022 and $720 at 2021 related to VIEs)4,724 4,118 
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds3,047
 2,503
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds3,430 4,089 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net387
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net370 389 
Other651
 612
Other650 792 
Total other noncurrent assets8,237
 7,226
Total other noncurrent assets9,174 9,388 
Total Assets$33,377
 $30,011
Total Assets$36,752 $35,383 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities   Current Liabilities
Accounts payable$629
 $660
Accounts payable$601 $476 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies203
 278
Accounts payable to affiliated companies508 310 
Notes payable to affiliated companies66
 294
Notes payable to affiliated companies238 172 
Taxes accrued17
 53
Taxes accrued77 163 
Interest accrued110
 116
Interest accrued101 96 
Current maturities of long-term debt1,006
 603
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $34 at 2022 and $15 at 2021 related to VIEs)Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $34 at 2022 and $15 at 2021 related to VIEs)369 556 
Asset retirement obligations485
 509
Asset retirement obligations288 274 
Regulatory liabilities236
 178
Regulatory liabilities332 381 
Other478
 408
Other384 448 
Total current liabilities3,230
 3,099
Total current liabilities2,898 2,876 
Long-Term Debt7,902
 7,451
Long-Term Debt (includes $1,114 at 2022 and $1,097 at 2021 related to VIEs)Long-Term Debt (includes $1,114 at 2022 and $1,097 at 2021 related to VIEs)10,568 9,543 
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies150
 150
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies150 150 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes2,388
 2,119
Deferred income taxes2,477 2,208 
Asset retirement obligations5,408
 4,311
Asset retirement obligations5,535 5,401 
Regulatory liabilities4,232
 3,955
Regulatory liabilities4,120 4,868 
Operating lease liabilities354
 
Operating lease liabilities335 350 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs238
 237
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs160 221 
Investment tax credits137
 142
Investment tax credits124 128 
Other92
 106
Other76 87 
Total other noncurrent liabilities12,849
 10,870
Total other noncurrent liabilities12,827 13,263 
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments and Contingencies
Equity   Equity
Member's Equity9,246
 8,441
Member's Equity10,309 9,551 
Total Liabilities and Equity$33,377
 $30,011
Total Liabilities and Equity$36,752 $35,383 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

93
97

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$805
 $667
 $715
Net income$1,008 $991 $415 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel)1,329
 1,183
 936
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of nuclear fuel)1,371 1,286 1,299 
Equity component of AFUDC(60) (57) (47)Equity component of AFUDC(52)(34)(29)
Gains on sales of other assets
 (9) (5)
Impairment charges12
 33
 19
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges7 63 499 
Deferred income taxes197
 236
 384
Deferred income taxes121 (46)(234)
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs4
 15
 (20)
Contributions to qualified pension plans(3) (25) 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(8)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(390) (195) (192)Payments for asset retirement obligations(193)(187)(304)
Provisions for rate refunds12
 122
 
Provisions for rate refunds(58)(36)
(Increase) decrease in     (Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions(6) 5
 (4)Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions 48 
Receivables21
 (107) (58)Receivables(228)(52)(4)
Receivables from affiliated companies(29) (20) 2
Receivables from affiliated companies58 (33)
Inventory20
 63
 59
Inventory(85)(11)23 
Other current assets101
 (201) (75)
Other current assets(a)
Other current assets(a)
(207)(147)98 
Increase (decrease) in     Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable32
 219
 (230)Accounts payable20 12 (127)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(75) 99
 (48)Accounts payable to affiliated companies198 95 12 
Taxes accrued(46) (11) (39)Taxes accrued(86)83 68 
Other current liabilities68
 46
 (131)Other current liabilities13 (23)157 
Other assets(198) (447) (53)
Other assets(a)
Other assets(a)
(416)(37)(215)
Other liabilities29
 12
 (18)Other liabilities38 (16)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,823
 1,628
 1,195
Net cash provided by operating activities1,501 1,956 1,666 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Capital expenditures(2,108) (2,220) (1,715)Capital expenditures(2,070)(1,746)(1,581)
Purchases of debt and equity securities(842) (1,236) (1,249)Purchases of debt and equity securities(1,148)(1,931)(1,555)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities810
 1,206
 1,207
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities1,138 1,914 1,516 
Notes receivable from affiliated companies
 
 165
Other(119) (95) (51)Other(29)(20)(57)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,259) (2,345) (1,643)Net cash used in investing activities(2,109)(1,783)(1,677)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt1,269
 845
 812
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt1,477 1,959 1,296 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(605) (3) (470)Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(645)(1,308)(1,085)
Notes payable to affiliated companies(228) 54
 240
Notes payable to affiliated companies67 (123)229 
Distributions to parent
 (175) (124)Distributions to parent(250)(700)(400)
Other(1) (1) (1)Other(1)(1)(12)
Net cash provided by financing activities435
 720
 457
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(1) 3
 9
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period23
 20
 11
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$22
 $23
 $20
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) financing activities648 (173)28 
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cashNet increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash40 — 17 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period39 39 22 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of periodCash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$79 $39 $39 
Supplemental Disclosures:     Supplemental Disclosures:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$331
 $303
 $291
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$386 $335 $301 
Cash (received from) paid for income taxes(30) (112) 59
Cash paid for income taxesCash paid for income taxes157 83 123 
Significant non-cash transactions:        Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures175
 220
 191
Accrued capital expenditures269 163 149 
(a)    Includes approximately $402 million for impacts of under-collected deferred fuel regulatory assets for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

94
98




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
 Member's
(in millions)Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016$7,358
Net income715
Distribution to parent(124)
Balance at December 31, 2017$7,949
Net income667
Distribution to parent(175)
Balance at December 31, 2018$8,441
Net income805
Balance at December 31, 2019$9,246
Member's
(in millions)Equity
Balance at December 31, 2019$9,246 
Net income415 
Distribution to parent(400)
Other(1)
Balance at December 31, 2020$9,260 
Net income991 
Distribution to parent(700)
Balance at December 31, 2021$9,551 
Net income1,008
Distribution to parent(250)
Balance at December 31, 2022$10,309
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

95
99




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Florida, LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Florida, LLC and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Florida Public Service Commission (the “Commission”), which has jurisdiction with respect to the electric rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As discussed in Note 4, regulatory proceedings in recent years have focused on the recoverability of storm and fuel costs. As a result, assessing the potential outcomes of future regulatory orders in Florida requires significant management judgment. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $3.6 billion recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commission, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commission, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of the recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commission, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commission’s treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commission, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
96

REPORTS
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2001.

97

100




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues$5,231
 $5,021
 $4,646
Operating Revenues$6,353 $5,259 $5,188 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,012
 2,085
 1,808
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power2,586 1,806 1,737 
Operation, maintenance and other1,034
 1,025
 853
Operation, maintenance and other967 1,048 1,131 
Depreciation and amortization702
 628
 560
Depreciation and amortization955 831 702 
Property and other taxes392
 374
 347
Property and other taxes421 383 381 
Impairment charges(36) 54
 138
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges4 19 (4)
Total operating expenses4,104
 4,166
 3,706
Total operating expenses4,933 4,087 3,947 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 1
 1
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net2 
Operating Income1,127
 856
 941
Operating Income1,422 1,173 1,242 
Other Income and Expenses, net48
 86
 96
Other Income and Expenses, net74 71 53 
Interest Expense328
 287
 279
Interest Expense362 319 326 
Income Before Income Taxes847
 655
 758
Income Before Income Taxes1,134 925 969 
Income Tax Expense155
 101
 46
Income Tax Expense225 187 198 
Net Income$692
 $554
 $712
Net Income$909 $738 $771 
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax     
Unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities1
 (1) 3
Other Comprehensive Income (Loss), net of tax1
 (1) 3
Other Comprehensive Loss, net of taxOther Comprehensive Loss, net of tax   
Unrealized losses on available-for-sale securitiesUnrealized losses on available-for-sale securities(5)(1)(1)
Other Comprehensive Loss, net of taxOther Comprehensive Loss, net of tax(5)(1)(1)
Comprehensive Income$693
 $553
 $715
Comprehensive Income$904 $737 $770 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
98

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 December 31,
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS  
Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents$45 $23 
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $8 at 2022 and 2021)148 117 
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $28 at 2022 and $8 at 2021)496 432 
Receivables from affiliated companies2 16 
Inventory573 477 
Regulatory assets (includes $55 at 2022 and $54 at 2021 related to VIEs)1,143 497 
Other (includes $46 at 2022 and $39 at 2021 related to VIEs)108 80 
Total current assets2,515 1,642 
Property, Plant and Equipment  
Cost25,940 23,865 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(6,377)(5,819)
Net property, plant and equipment19,563 18,046 
Other Noncurrent Assets  
Regulatory assets (includes $826 at 2022 and $883 at 2021 related to VIEs)2,422 1,791 
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds424 553 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net258 302 
Other372 399 
Total other noncurrent assets3,476 3,045 
Total Assets$25,554 $22,733 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable$880 $623 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies177 209 
Notes payable to affiliated companies605 199 
Taxes accrued53 51 
Interest accrued80 68 
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $306 at 2022 and $56 at 2021 related to VIEs)328 76 
Asset retirement obligations1 
Regulatory liabilities244 98 
Other363 408 
Total current liabilities2,731 1,733 
Long-Term Debt (includes $890 at 2022 and $1,196 at 2021 related to VIEs)9,381 8,406 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities  
Deferred income taxes2,789 2,434 
Asset retirement obligations357 436 
Regulatory liabilities633 698 
Operating lease liabilities211 256 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs111 166 
Investment tax credits234 236 
Other84 73 
Total other noncurrent liabilities4,419 4,299 
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity  
Member's equity9,031 8,298 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(8)(3)
Total equity9,023 8,295 
Total Liabilities and Equity$25,554 $22,733 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
99

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$909 $738 $771 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation, amortization and accretion1,032 1,011 1,019 
Equity component of AFUDC(16)(16)(12)
Impairment of assets and other charges4 19 (4)
Deferred income taxes285 279 27 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(5)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(98)(101)(80)
(Increase) decrease in
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions — (14)
Receivables(93)(45)(64)
Receivables from affiliated companies14 (13)(3)
Inventory(98)(15)26 
Other current assets(a)
(640)(451)40 
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable202 47 66 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(32)124 (46)
Taxes accrued2 (30)39 
Other current liabilities62 (7)(7)
Other assets(a)
(704)(69)84 
Other liabilities18 (69)(181)
Net cash provided by operating activities842 1,402 1,661 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures(2,247)(1,923)(1,907)
Purchases of debt and equity securities(193)(302)(4,443)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities279 408 4,495 
Notes receivable from affiliated companies — 173 
Other(108)(136)(103)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,269)(1,953)(1,785)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt1,298 1,135 495 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(77)(575)(572)
Notes payable to affiliated companies406 196 
Distributions to parent(175)— — 
Other(1)— (1)
Net cash provided by financing activities1,451 563 118 
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash24 12 (6)
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period62 50 56 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period$86 $62 $50 
Supplemental Disclosures:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$339 $308 $321 
Cash (received from) paid for income taxes(83)(15)138 
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures394 337 214 
(a)    Includes approximately $942 million for impacts of under-collected deferred fuel regulatory assets for the year ended December 31, 2022.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
100

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Net Unrealized
Gains (Losses) on
 Member'sAvailable-for-Total
(in millions)EquitySale SecuritiesEquity
Balance at December 31, 2019$6,789 $(1)$6,788 
Net income771 — 771 
Other comprehensive loss— (1)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2020$7,560 $(2)$7,558 
Net income738 — 738 
Other comprehensive loss— (1)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2021$8,298 $(3)$8,295 
Net income909  909 
Other comprehensive loss (5)(5)
Distribution to parent(175) (175)
Other(1) (1)
Balance at December 31, 2022$9,031 $(8)$9,023 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

101





FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETSREPORTS
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
ASSETS   
Current Assets   
Cash and cash equivalents$17
 $36
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and 2018)96
 143
Receivables of VIEs (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at 2019 and $3 at 2018)341
 362
Receivables from affiliated companies
 28
Notes receivable from affiliated companies173
 
Inventory489

504
Regulatory assets (includes $52 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)419
 434
Other (includes $39 at 2019 and 2018 related to VIEs)58
 46
Total current assets1,593
 1,553
Property, Plant and Equipment   
Cost20,457
 18,792
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(5,236) (4,968)
Net property, plant and equipment15,221
 13,824
Other Noncurrent Assets   
Regulatory assets (includes $989 at 2019 and $1,041 at 2018 related to VIEs)2,194
 2,454
Nuclear decommissioning trust funds734
 659
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net401
 
Other311
 311
Total other noncurrent assets3,640
 3,424
Total Assets$20,454
 $18,801
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Current Liabilities   
Accounts payable$474
 $511
Accounts payable to affiliated companies131
 91
Notes payable to affiliated companies
 108
Taxes accrued43
 74
Interest accrued75
 75
Current maturities of long-term debt (includes $54 at 2019 and $53 at 2018 related to VIEs)571
 270
Asset retirement obligations
 5
Regulatory liabilities94
 102
Other415
 406
Total current liabilities1,803
 1,642
Long-Term Debt (includes $1,307 at 2019 and $1,336 at 2018 related to VIEs)7,416
 7,051
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   
Deferred income taxes2,179
 1,986
Asset retirement obligations578
 586
Regulatory liabilities993
 1,094
Operating lease liabilities343
 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs218
 254
Other136
 93
Total other noncurrent liabilities4,447
 4,013
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Equity   
Member's equity6,789
 6,097
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(1) (2)
Total equity6,788
 6,095
Total Liabilities and Equity$20,454
 $18,801
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

102




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     
Net income$692
 $554
 $712
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation, amortization and accretion869
 793
 570
Equity component of AFUDC(6) (47) (45)
Gains on sales of other assets
 (1) (1)
Impairment charges(36) 54
 138
Deferred income taxes180
 159
 245
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs11
 5
 (13)
Contributions to qualified pension plans(53) (20) 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(22) (35) (56)
(Increase) decrease in     
Net realized and unrealized mark-to-market and hedging transactions(33) 7
 5
Receivables26
 (100) (38)
Receivables from affiliated companies17
 (26) 
Inventory42
 58
 66
Other current assets156
 59
 (138)
Increase (decrease) in     
Accounts payable(36) (1) (32)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies40
 17
 (51)
Taxes accrued(31) 40
 1
Other current liabilities(36) 82
 (37)
Other assets(135) (428) (229)
Other liabilities(167) (61) (82)
Net cash provided by operating activities1,478
 1,109
 1,015
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     
Capital expenditures(1,844) (1,634) (1,437)
Purchases of debt and equity securities(669) (517) (557)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities695
 563
 617
Notes receivable from affiliated companies(173) 313
 (313)
Other(67) (65) (7)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,058) (1,340) (1,697)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt918
 988
 1,306
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(262) (769) (342)
Notes payable to affiliated companies(108) 108
 (297)
Distribution to parent
 (75) 
Other13
 1
 (1)
Net cash provided by financing activities561
 253
 666
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash(19) 22
 (16)
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at beginning of period75
 53
 69
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at end of period$56
 $75
 $53
Supplemental Disclosures:     
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$332
 $270
 $274
Cash paid for (received from) income taxes1
 (120) (197)
Significant non-cash transactions:     
Accrued capital expenditures272
 258
 199
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

103




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
    Accumulated 
    Other 
    Comprehensive 
    Income (Loss) 
    Net Unrealized
  
    Gains (Losses) on
  
  Member's
 Available-for-
 Total
(in millions) Equity
 Sale Securities
 Equity
Balance at December 31, 2016 $4,899
 $1
 $4,900
Net income 712
 
 712
Other comprehensive income 
 3
 3
Other 3
 
 3
Balance at December 31, 2017 $5,614
 $4
 $5,618
Net income 554
 
 554
Other comprehensive loss 
 (1) (1)
Distribution to parent (75) 
 (75)
Other(a)
 4
 (5) (1)
Balance at December 31, 2018 $6,097
 $(2) $6,095
Net income 692
 
 692
Other comprehensive income 
 1
 1
Balance at December 31, 2019 $6,789
 $(1) $6,788
(a)Amounts represent a cumulative-effect adjustment due to implementation of a new accounting standard related to Financial Instruments Classification and Measurement. See Note 1 for more information.
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

104




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio and by the Kentucky Public Service Commission (collectively the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the electric and natural gas rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $684 million recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commissions, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commissions, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
102

REPORTS
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

103

105




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)  2019
 2018
 2017
Operating Revenues     
Regulated electric$1,456
 $1,450
 $1,373
Regulated natural gas484
 506
 508
Nonregulated electric and other
 1
 42
Total operating revenues1,940
 1,957
 1,923
Operating Expenses  
     
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – regulated388
 412
 369
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power – nonregulated
 
 58
Cost of natural gas  95
 113
 107
Operation, maintenance and other520
 480
 530
Depreciation and amortization265
 268
 261
Property and other taxes308
 290
 278
Impairment charges
 
 1
Total operating expenses1,576
 1,563
 1,604
(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net
 (106) 1
Operating Income364
 288
 320
Other Income and Expenses, net24
 23
 23
Interest Expense109
 92
 91
Income From Continuing Operations Before Income Taxes279
 219
 252
Income Tax Expense From Continuing Operations40
 43
 59
Income From Continuing Operations239
 176
 193
Loss From Discontinued Operations, net of tax(1) 
 (1)
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$238
 $176
 $192

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues   
Regulated electric$1,798 $1,493 $1,405 
Regulated natural gas716 544 453 
Total operating revenues2,514 2,037 1,858 
Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power657 409 339 
Cost of natural gas261 136 73 
Operation, maintenance and other523 479 463 
Depreciation and amortization324 307 278 
Property and other taxes369 355 324 
Impairment of assets and other charges(10)25 — 
Total operating expenses2,124 1,711 1,477 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net1 — 
Operating Income391 327 381 
Other Income and Expenses, net19 18 16 
Interest Expense129 111 102 
Income Before Income Taxes281 234 295 
Income Tax (Benefit) Expense(21)30 43 
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$302 $204 $252 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

104
106




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS   ASSETS  
Current Assets   Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents$17
 $21
Cash and cash equivalents$16 $13 
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at 2019 and $2 at 2018)84
 102
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6 at 2022 and $4 at 2021)Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6 at 2022 and $4 at 2021)73 96 
Receivables from affiliated companies92
 114
Receivables from affiliated companies247 122 
Notes receivable from affiliated companiesNotes receivable from affiliated companies 15 
Inventory135

126
Inventory144 116 
Regulatory assets49
 33
Regulatory assets103 72 
Other21
 24
Other86 57 
Total current assets398
 420
Total current assets669 491 
Property, Plant and Equipment   Property, Plant and Equipment  
Cost10,241
 9,360
Cost12,497 11,725 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(2,843) (2,717)Accumulated depreciation and amortization(3,250)(3,106)
Facilities to be retired, netFacilities to be retired, net 
Net property, plant and equipment7,398
 6,643
Net property, plant and equipment9,247 8,625 
Other Noncurrent Assets   Other Noncurrent Assets  
Goodwill920
 920
Goodwill920 920 
Regulatory assets549
 531
Regulatory assets581 635 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net21
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net18 19 
Other52
 41
Other71 84 
Total other noncurrent assets1,542
 1,492
Total other noncurrent assets1,590 1,658 
Total Assets$9,338
 $8,555
Total Assets$11,506 $10,774 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Current Liabilities   Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable$288
 $316
Accounts payable$380 $348 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies68
 78
Accounts payable to affiliated companies72 64 
Notes payable to affiliated companies312
 274
Notes payable to affiliated companies497 103 
Taxes accrued219
 202
Taxes accrued317 275 
Interest accrued30
 22
Interest accrued29 30 
Current maturities of long-term debt
 551
Current maturities of long-term debt475 — 
Asset retirement obligations1
 6
Asset retirement obligations17 13 
Regulatory liabilities64
 57
Regulatory liabilities99 62 
Other75
 74
Other74 82 
Total current liabilities1,057
 1,580
Total current liabilities1,960 977 
Long-Term Debt2,594
 1,589
Long-Term Debt2,745 3,168 
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies25
 25
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies25 25 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   Other Noncurrent Liabilities  
Deferred income taxes922
 817
Deferred income taxes1,136 1,050 
Asset retirement obligations79
 87
Asset retirement obligations137 123 
Regulatory liabilities763
 840
Regulatory liabilities534 739 
Operating lease liabilities21
 
Operating lease liabilities17 18 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs100
 79
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs90 109 
Other94
 93
Other96 101 
Total other noncurrent liabilities1,979
 1,916
Total other noncurrent liabilities2,010 2,140 
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments and Contingencies
Equity   Equity  
Common stock, $8.50 par value, 120 million shares authorized; 90 million shares outstanding at 2019 and 2018762
 762
Common stock, $8.50 par value, 120 million shares authorized; 90 million shares outstanding at 2022 and 2021Common stock, $8.50 par value, 120 million shares authorized; 90 million shares outstanding at 2022 and 2021762 762 
Additional paid-in capital2,776
 2,776
Additional paid-in capital3,100 3,100 
Retained earnings (Accumulated deficit)145
 (93)
Retained earningsRetained earnings904 602 
Total equity3,683
 3,445
Total equity4,766 4,464 
Total Liabilities and Equity$9,338
 $8,555
Total Liabilities and Equity$11,506 $10,774 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

105
107




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$238
 $176
 $192
Net income$302 $204 $252 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation, amortization and accretion269
 271
 265
Depreciation, amortization and accretion328 311 283 
Equity component of AFUDC(13) (11) (11)Equity component of AFUDC(7)(7)(7)
Losses (Gains) on sales of other assets
 106
 (1)
Impairment charges
 
 1
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges(10)25 — 
Deferred income taxes81
 25
 90
Deferred income taxes(22)42 31 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs2
 3
 2
Contributions to qualified pension plans(2) 
 (4)Contributions to qualified pension plans(3)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(8) (3) (7)Payments for asset retirement obligations(12)(2)(2)
Provision for rate refunds7
 24
 
Provision for rate refunds5 16 14 
(Increase) decrease in     (Increase) decrease in   
Receivables20
 (33) 2
Receivables23 (13)
Receivables from affiliated companies22
 19
 (4)Receivables from affiliated companies(5)(25)
Inventory(9) 7
 6
Inventory(28)(6)25 
Other current assets(5) 16
 (22)Other current assets(55)(60)(18)
Increase (decrease) in     Increase (decrease) in   
Accounts payable(17) (19) 12
Accounts payable44 38 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(10) 16
 (1)Accounts payable to affiliated companies8 (4)— 
Taxes accrued17
 12
 11
Taxes accrued42 26 30 
Other current liabilities1
 14
 (19)Other current liabilities(63)11 
Other assets(22) (26) (28)Other assets(29)(43)(32)
Other liabilities(45) (27) (5)Other liabilities64 27 (2)
Net cash provided by operating activities526
 570
 479
Net cash provided by operating activities582 559 575 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Capital expenditures(952) (827) (686)Capital expenditures(850)(848)(834)
Notes receivable from affiliated companies
 14
 80
Notes receivable from affiliated companies(105)(10)(19)
Other(68) (89) (41)Other(67)(60)(48)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,020) (902) (647)Net cash used in investing activities(1,022)(918)(901)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt1,003
 99
 182
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt50 150 467 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(551) (3) (2)Payments for the redemption of long-term debt (50)— 
Notes payable to affiliated companies38
 245
 13
Notes payable to affiliated companies395 (67)(144)
Dividends to parent
 
 (25)
Capital contribution from parentCapital contribution from parent 325 — 
Other
 
 (1)Other(2)— — 
Net cash provided by financing activities490
 341
 167
Net cash provided by financing activities443 358 323 
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents(4) 9
 (1)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalentsNet increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents3 (1)(3)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period21
 12
 13
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period13 14 17 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$17
 $21
 $12
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$16 $13 $14 
Supplemental Disclosures:     Supplemental Disclosures:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$97
 $87
 $85
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$126 $107 $97 
Cash received from income taxes(37) (6) (8)
Cash (received from) paid for income taxesCash (received from) paid for income taxes(35)— 
Significant non-cash transactions:     Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures109
 95
 82
Accrued capital expenditures123 135 104 
Non-cash equity contribution from parent
 106
 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

106
108




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
  Additional
 Retained
  Additional
Common
 Paid-in
 Earnings
 Total
CommonPaid-inRetainedTotal
(in millions)Stock
 Capital
 (Deficit)
 Equity
(in millions)StockCapitalEarningsEquity
Balance at December 31, 2016$762
 $2,695
 $(461) $2,996
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 2019$762 $2,776 $145 $3,683 
Net income
 
 192
 192
Net income— — 252 252 
Dividends to parent
 (25) 
 (25)
Balance at December 31, 2017$762
 $2,670
 $(269) $3,163
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020$762 $2,776 $397 $3,935 
Net income
 
 176
 176
Net income— — 204 204 
Contribution from parent
 106
 
 106
Contribution from parent— 325 — 325 
Balance at December 31, 2018$762

$2,776

$(93)
$3,445
OtherOther— (1)— 
Balance at December 31, 2021Balance at December 31, 2021$762 $3,100 $602 $4,464 
Net income
 
 238
 238
Net income  302 302 
Balance at December 31, 2019$762
 $2,776
 $145
 $3,683
Balance at December 31, 2022Balance at December 31, 2022$762 $3,100 $904 $4,766 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

107
109




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Indiana, LLC
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Duke Energy Indiana, LLC and subsidiariessubsidiary (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1, 4 and 10 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (the “Commission”), which has jurisdiction with respect to the electric rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As discussed in Note 4, regulatory proceedings in recent years in Indiana have focused on the recoverability of fuel costs and asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash. As a result, assessing the potential outcomes of future regulatory orders requires significant management judgment. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $1.1 billion recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commission, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commission, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of the recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commission, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commission’s treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
108

REPORTS
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commission, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained an analysis from management and letters from internal legal counsel for asset retirement obligations specific to coal ash costs, regarding probability of recovery for deferred costs not yet addressed in a regulatory order to assess management’s assertion that amounts are probable of recovery.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2002.

109

110




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues$3,004
 $3,059
 $3,047
Operating Revenues$3,922 $3,174 $2,795 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses   
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power935

1,000
 966
Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power1,819 985 767 
Operation, maintenance and other790

788
 743
Operation, maintenance and other729 750 762 
Depreciation and amortization525

520
 458
Depreciation and amortization645 615 569 
Property and other taxes69

78
 76
Property and other taxes75 73 81 
Impairment charges

30
 18
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges388 — 
Total operating expenses2,319
 2,416
 2,261
Total operating expenses3,656 2,432 2,179 
Operating Income685
 643
 786
Operating Income266 742 616 
Other Income and Expenses, net41
 45
 47
Other Income and Expenses, net36 42 37 
Interest Expense156
 167
 178
Interest Expense189 196 161 
Income Before Income Taxes570

521

655
Income Before Income Taxes113 588 492 
Income Tax Expense134
 128
 301
Income Tax (Benefit) ExpenseIncome Tax (Benefit) Expense(24)107 84 
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$436

$393

$354
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$137 $481 $408 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

110
111




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31, December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS   ASSETS  
Current Assets   Current Assets  
Cash and cash equivalents$25
 $24
Cash and cash equivalents$31 $
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $3 at 2019 and $2 at 2018)60
 52
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at 2022 and $3 at 2021)Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $4 at 2022 and $3 at 2021)112 100 
Receivables from affiliated companies79
 122
Receivables from affiliated companies298 98 
Notes receivable from affiliated companiesNotes receivable from affiliated companies 134 
Inventory517

422
Inventory489 418 
Regulatory assets90
 175
Regulatory assets249 277 
Other60
 35
Other197 68 
Total current assets831
 830
Total current assets1,376 1,101 
Property, Plant and Equipment   Property, Plant and Equipment  
Cost16,305
 15,443
Cost18,121 17,343 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(5,233) (4,914)Accumulated depreciation and amortization(6,021)(5,583)
Net property, plant and equipment11,072
 10,529
Net property, plant and equipment12,100 11,760 
Other Noncurrent Assets  
Other Noncurrent Assets 
Regulatory assets1,082
 982
Regulatory assets875 1,278 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net57
 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net49 53 
Other234
 194
Other254 296 
Total other noncurrent assets1,373
 1,176
Total other noncurrent assets1,178 1,627 
Total Assets$13,276
 $12,535
Total Assets$14,654 $14,488 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   LIABILITIES AND EQUITY  
Current Liabilities   Current Liabilities  
Accounts payable$201
 $200
Accounts payable$391 $282 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies87
 83
Accounts payable to affiliated companies206 221 
Notes payable to affiliated companies30
 167
Notes payable to affiliated companies435 — 
Taxes accrued49
 43
Taxes accrued92 73 
Interest accrued58
 58
Interest accrued48 49 
Current maturities of long-term debt503
 63
Current maturities of long-term debt303 84 
Asset retirement obligations189
 109
Asset retirement obligations207 110 
Regulatory liabilities55
 25
Regulatory liabilities187 127 
Other112
 107
Other161 105 
Total current liabilities1,284
 855
Total current liabilities2,030 1,051 
Long-Term Debt3,404
 3,569
Long-Term Debt3,854 4,089 
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies150
 150
Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies150 150 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   Other Noncurrent Liabilities  
Deferred income taxes1,150
 1,009
Deferred income taxes1,299 1,303 
Asset retirement obligations643
 613
Asset retirement obligations744 877 
Regulatory liabilities1,685
 1,722
Regulatory liabilities1,454 1,565 
Operating lease liabilities55
 
Operating lease liabilities47 50 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs148
 115
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs122 167 
Investment tax credits164
 147
Investment tax credits186 177 
Other18
 16
Other65 44 
Total other noncurrent liabilities3,863
 3,622
Total other noncurrent liabilities3,917 4,183 
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Commitments and Contingencies
Equity   Equity  
Member's Equity4,575
 4,339
Member's equityMember's equity4,702 5,015 
Accumulated other comprehensive incomeAccumulated other comprehensive income1 — 
Total equityTotal equity4,703 5,015 
Total Liabilities and Equity$13,276
 $12,535
Total Liabilities and Equity$14,654 $14,488 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

111
112




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$436
 $393
 $354
Net income$137 $481 $408 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation, amortization, and accretion531
 524
 462
Depreciation, amortization and accretionDepreciation, amortization and accretion648 619 572 
Equity component of AFUDC(18) (32) (28)Equity component of AFUDC(13)(27)(23)
Impairment charges
 30
 18
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges388 — 
Deferred income taxes156
 95
 152
Deferred income taxes(64)34 29 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs6
 7
 2
Contributions to qualified pension plans(2) (8) 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(5)— — 
Payments for asset retirement obligations(48) (69) (45)Payments for asset retirement obligations(82)(67)(63)
Provision for rate refunds
 53
 
(Increase) decrease in     (Increase) decrease in   
Receivables(8) 7
 59
Receivables(3)(33)
Receivables from affiliated companies41
 3
 (11)Receivables from affiliated companies20 — — 
Inventory(95) 28
 54
Inventory(70)55 44 
Other current assets76
 (25) 28
Other current assets(3)(181)(3)
Increase (decrease) in     Increase (decrease) in   
Accounts payable(10) 37
 (86)Accounts payable105 76 (12)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies4
 5
 4
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(3)
Taxes accrued(25) (52) 64
Taxes accrued34 12 13 
Other current liabilities15
 14
 (10)Other current liabilities9 13 
Other assets(71) 29
 (28)Other assets(10)20 (68)
Other liabilities9
 (33) (20)Other liabilities13 (15)26 
Net cash provided by operating activities997
 1,006
 969
Net cash provided by operating activities1,101 1,004 938 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Capital expenditures(876) (832) (840)Capital expenditures(877)(818)(888)
Purchases of debt and equity securities(26) (48) (20)Purchases of debt and equity securities(61)(142)(37)
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities20
 44
 7
Proceeds from sales and maturities of debt and equity securities48 65 22 
Notes receivable from affiliated companies
 
 86
Notes receivable from affiliated companies(86)(120)(33)
Other(49) 18
 (65)Other(55)36 48 
Net cash used in investing activities(931) (818) (832)Net cash used in investing activities(1,031)(979)(888)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt485
 
 
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt67 300 544 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(213) (3) (5)Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(84)(70)(513)
Notes payable to affiliated companies(137) 6
 161
Notes payable to affiliated companies435 (131)101 
Distributions to parent(200) (175) (300)Distributions to parent(462)(125)(200)
Other
 (1) (1)Other(1)— — 
Net cash used in financing activities(65) (173) (145)Net cash used in financing activities(45)(26)(68)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents1
 15
 (8)Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents25 (1)(18)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period24
 9
 17
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period6 25 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$25
 $24
 $9
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$31 $$
Supplemental Disclosures:     Supplemental Disclosures:   
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$150
 $162
 $179
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$186 $194 $164 
Cash (received from) paid for income taxes(6) 75
 117
Cash paid for income taxesCash paid for income taxes35 56 36 
Significant non-cash transactions:     Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures102
 88
 125
Accrued capital expenditures122 118 101 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

112
113




FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLC
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Accumulated 
Other
Comprehensive
Income
Pension
Member's
Member'sand OPEBTotal
(in millions)Equity
(in millions)EquityAdjustmentsEquity
Balance at December 31, 2016$4,067
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 2019$4,575 $— $4,575 
Net incomeNet income408 — 408 
Distributions to parentDistributions to parent(200)— (200)
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020$4,783 $— $4,783 
Net incomeNet income481 — 481 
Distributions to parentDistributions to parent(250)— (250)
OtherOther— 
Balance at December 31, 2021Balance at December 31, 2021$5,015 $— $5,015 
Net income354
Net income137  137 
Distributions to parent(300)Distributions to parent(450) (450)
Balance at December 31, 2017$4,121
Net income393
Distributions to parent(175)
Balance at December 31, 2018$4,339
Net income436
Distributions to parent(200)
Balance at December 31, 2019$4,575
OtherOther 1 1 
Balance at December 31, 2022Balance at December 31, 2022$4,702 $1 $4,703 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements 

113
114




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholder and the Board of Directors of Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20192022, and 2018,2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Regulatory Matters – Impact of Rate Regulation on the Financial Statements – Refer to Notes 1 and 4 to the financial statements.
Critical Audit Matter Description
The Company is subject to rate regulation by the North Carolina Utilities Commission, the Public Service Commission of South Carolina, and the Tennessee Public Utility Commission (collectively the “Commissions”), which have jurisdiction with respect to the gas rates of the Company. Management has determined it meets the criteria for the application of regulated operations accounting in preparing its financial statements under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Significant judgment can be required to determine if otherwise recognizable incurred costs qualify to be presented as a regulatory asset and deferred because such costs are probable of future recovery in customer rates. As of December 31, 2022, the Company has approximately $511 million recorded as regulatory assets.
We identified the impact of rate regulation related to regulatory assets as a critical audit matter due to the significant judgments made by management, including assumptions regarding the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, to support its assertions on the likelihood of future recovery for deferred costs. Given that management’s accounting judgments are based on assumptions about the outcome of future decisions by the Commissions, auditing these judgments required specialized knowledge of accounting for rate regulation and the ratemaking process due to its inherent complexities as it relates to regulatory assets.
How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit
Our audit procedures related to the recovery of regulatory assets included the following, among others:
We tested the effectiveness of management’s controls over the evaluation of the likelihood of recovery in future rates and the monitoring and evaluation of regulatory developments that may affect the likelihood of recovering costs in future rates.
We evaluated the Company’s disclosures related to the impacts of rate regulation, including the balances recorded and regulatory developments.
We read relevant regulatory orders issued by the Commission, regulatory statutes, interpretations, procedural memorandums, filings made by interveners, and other publicly available information to assess the likelihood of recovery in future rates based on precedents of the Commissions’ treatment of similar costs under similar circumstances. We evaluated the external information and compared it to management’s recorded balances for completeness.
For regulatory matters in process, we inspected the Company’s and intervenors’ filings with the Commissions, that may impact the Company’s future rates, for any evidence that might contradict management’s assertions.
114

REPORTS
We evaluated the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the recoverability of regulatory asset balances by performing the following:
We inquired of management regarding changes in regulatory orders and regulatory asset balances during the year.
We evaluated the reasonableness of such changes based on our knowledge of commission-approved amortization, expected incurred costs, and recently approved regulatory orders, as applicable.
We utilized trend analyses to evaluate the historical consistency of regulatory asset balances.
We compared the recorded regulatory asset balance to an independently developed expectation of the corresponding balance.
We obtained representation from management asserting that regulatory assets recorded in the financial statements are probable of recovery.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 202027, 2023
We have served as the Company's auditor since 1951.


115





FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
Operating Revenues     Operating Revenues
Regulated natural gas$1,369
 $1,365
 $1,319
Regulated natural gas$2,100 $1,555 $1,286 
Nonregulated natural gas and other12
 10
 9
Nonregulated natural gas and other24 14 11 
Total operating revenues1,381
 1,375
 1,328
Total operating revenues2,124 1,569 1,297 
Operating Expenses     Operating Expenses 
Cost of natural gas532
 584
 524
Cost of natural gas1,015 569 386 
Operation, maintenance and other328
 357
 304
Operation, maintenance and other368 327 322 
Depreciation and amortization172
 159
 148
Depreciation and amortization222 213 180 
Property and other taxes45
 49
 48
Property and other taxes57 55 53 
Impairment charges
 
 7
Impairment of assets and other chargesImpairment of assets and other charges18 10 
Total operating expenses1,077
 1,149

1,031
Total operating expenses1,680 1,174 948 
Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, netGains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, net4  — 
Operating Income304
 226

297
Operating Income448 395 349 
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates8
 7
 (6)
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliatesEquity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates8 
Other income and expense, net20
 14
 (11)Other income and expense, net46 55 51 
Total other income and expenses28
 21

(17)Total other income and expenses54 64 60 
Interest Expense87
 81
 79
Interest Expense140 119 118 
Income Before Income Taxes245
 166

201
Income Before Income Taxes362 340 291 
Income Tax Expense43
 37
 62
Income Tax Expense39 30 18 
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$202
 $129

$139
Net Income and Comprehensive Income$323 $310 $273 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


116





FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
ASSETS   
Current Assets   
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $6 at 2019 and $2 at 2018)$241
 $266
Receivables from affiliated companies10
 22
Inventory72
 70
Regulatory assets73
 54
Other28
 19
Total current assets424
 431
Property, Plant and Equipment   
Cost8,446
 7,486
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1,681) (1,575)
Net property, plant and equipment6,765
 5,911
Other Noncurrent Assets   
Goodwill49
 49
Regulatory assets290
 303
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net24
 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates83
 64
Other121
 52
Total other noncurrent assets567
 468
Total Assets$7,756
 $6,810
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY   
Current Liabilities   
Accounts payable$215
 $203
Accounts payable to affiliated companies3
 38
Notes payable to affiliated companies476
 198
Taxes accrued24
 84
Interest accrued33
 31
Current maturities of long-term debt
 350
Regulatory liabilities81
 37
Other67
 58
Total current liabilities899
 999
Long-Term Debt2,384
 1,788
Other Noncurrent Liabilities   
Deferred income taxes708
 551
Asset retirement obligations17
 19
Regulatory liabilities1,131
 1,181
Operating lease liabilities23
 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs3
 4
Other148
 177
Total other noncurrent liabilities2,030
 1,932
Commitments and Contingencies

 

Equity   
Common stock, no par value: 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2019 and 20181,310
 1,160
Retained earnings1,133
 931
Total equity2,443
 2,091
Total Liabilities and Equity$7,756
 $6,810

December 31,
(in millions)20222021
ASSETS
Current Assets
Receivables (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $14 at 2022 and $15 at 2021)$436 $318 
Receivables from affiliated companies11 11 
Inventory172 109 
Regulatory assets119 141 
Other4 
Total current assets742 588 
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost10,869 9,918 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(2,081)(1,899)
Facilities to be retired, net9 11 
Net property, plant and equipment8,797 8,030 
Other Noncurrent Assets
Goodwill49 49 
Regulatory assets392 316 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net4 16 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates79 95 
Other272 288 
Total other noncurrent assets796 764 
Total Assets$10,335 $9,382 
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable$345 $196 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies51 40 
Notes payable to affiliated companies514 518 
Taxes accrued74 63 
Interest accrued40 37 
Current maturities of long-term debt45 — 
Regulatory liabilities74 56 
Other81 81 
Total current liabilities1,224 991 
Long-Term Debt3,318 2,968 
Other Noncurrent Liabilities
Deferred income taxes870 815 
Asset retirement obligations26 22 
Regulatory liabilities1,024 1,058 
Operating lease liabilities13 14 
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs7 
Other180 158 
Total other noncurrent liabilities2,120 2,074 
Commitments and Contingencies
Equity
Common stock, no par value: 100 shares authorized and outstanding at 2022 and 20211,635 1,635 
Retained earnings2,037 1,714 
Total Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc. stockholder's equity3,672 3,349 
Noncontrolling interests1 — 
Total equity3,673 3,349 
Total Liabilities and Equity$10,335 $9,382 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


117





FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     
Net income$202
 $129
 $139
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization174
 161
 151
Impairment charges
 
 7
Deferred income taxes136
 (31) 154
Equity in (earnings) losses from unconsolidated affiliates(8) (7) 6
Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs(9) (4) 23
Contributions to qualified pension plans(1) 
 (11)
Provision for rate refunds2
 43
 
(Increase) decrease in     
Receivables28
 7
 (40)
Receivables from affiliated companies12
 (15) 
Inventory(2) (4) 
Other current assets(25) 71
 (20)
Increase (decrease) in     
Accounts payable(7) 15
 (13)
Accounts payable to affiliated companies(35) 25
 5
Taxes accrued(60) 65
 (48)
Other current liabilities1
 21
 (9)
Other assets9
 6
 7
Other liabilities(8) (4) (2)
Net cash provided by operating activities409
 478
 349
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     
Capital expenditures(1,053) (721) (585)
Contributions to equity method investments(16) 
 (12)
Other(14) (10) (6)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,083) (731) (603)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt596
 100
 250
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt(350) 
 (35)
Notes payable and commercial paper
 
 (330)
Notes payable to affiliated companies278
 (166) 364
Capital contribution from parent150
 300
 
Other
 
 (1)
Net cash provided by financing activities674
 234
 248
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
 (19) (6)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
 19
 25
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$
 $
 $19
Supplemental Disclosures:     
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$84
 $79
 $78
Cash received from income taxes(31) (16) (12)
Significant non-cash transactions:     
Accrued capital expenditures109
 96
 34
Transfer of ownership interest of certain equity method investees to parent
 
 149

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income$323 $310 $273 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization225 216 182 
Equity component of AFUDC(11)(20)(19)
Gains on sales of other assets(4)— — 
Impairment of assets and other charges18 10 
Deferred income taxes5 53 
Contributions to qualified pension plans(2)— — 
Equity in earnings from unconsolidated affiliates(8)(9)(9)
Provision for rate refunds(3)(4)(33)
(Increase) decrease in
Receivables(111)(77)10 
Receivables from affiliated companies (1)— 
Inventory(63)(40)
Other current assets32 33 (66)
Increase (decrease) in
Accounts payable40 (25)16 
Accounts payable to affiliated companies11 (39)76 
Taxes accrued11 37 
Other current liabilities36 (26)(11)
Other assets9 26 (11)
Other liabilities(1)(4)
Net cash provided by operating activities507 391 481 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Capital expenditures(862)(850)(901)
Contributions to equity method investments(8)(9)— 
Other(26)(31)(28)
Net cash used in investing activities(896)(890)(929)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt394 347 394 
Payments for the redemption of long-term debt (160)— 
Notes payable to affiliated companies(4)(13)54 
Capital contribution from parent 325 — 
Other(1)— — 
Net cash provided by financing activities389 499 448 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents — — 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period — — 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period$ $— $— 
Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash paid for interest, net of amount capitalized$135 $114 $115 
Cash paid for (received from) income taxes23 (13)(36)
Significant non-cash transactions:
Accrued capital expenditures207 97 106 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


118





FINANCIAL STATEMENTS


PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Total
Piedmont
Natural Gas
Common
 Retained
 Total
CommonRetainedCompany, Inc.NoncontrollingTotal
(in millions)Stock
 Earnings
 Equity
(in millions)StockEarningsEquityInterestsEquity
Balance at December 31, 2016$860
 $812
 $1,672
Balance at December 31, 2019Balance at December 31, 2019$1,310 $1,133 $2,443 $— $2,443 
Net income
 139
 139
Net income— 273 273 — 273 
Transfer of ownership interest of certain equity method investees to parent
 (149) (149)
Balance at December 31, 2017$860
 $802
 $1,662
OtherOther— (1)(1)— (1)
Balance at December 31, 2020Balance at December 31, 2020$1,310 $1,405 $2,715 $— $2,715 
Net income
 129
 129
Net income— 310 310 — 310 
Contribution from parent300
 
 300
Contribution from parent325 — 325 — 325 
Balance at December 31, 2018$1,160
 $931
 $2,091
OtherOther— (1)(1)— (1)
Balance at December 31, 2021Balance at December 31, 2021$1,635 $1,714 $3,349 $— $3,349 
Net income

 202
 202
Net income 323 323  323 
Contribution from parent150
 
 150
Balance at December 31, 2019$1,310
 $1,133
 $2,443
OtherOther   1 1 
Balance at December 31, 2022Balance at December 31, 2022$1,635 $2,037 $3,672 $1 $3,673 
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


119





FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Index to Combined Notes To Consolidated Financial Statements
The notes to the consolidated financial statements are a combined presentation. The following table indicates the registrants to which the notes apply.
Applicable Notes Applicable Notes
Registrant123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627Registrant123456789101112131415161718192021222324252627
Duke Energy Duke Energy 
Duke Energy Carolinas    Duke Energy Carolinas  
Progress Energy    Progress Energy  
Duke Energy Progress     Duke Energy Progress   
Duke Energy Florida    Duke Energy Florida  
Duke Energy Ohio      Duke Energy Ohio    
Duke Energy Indiana    Duke Energy Indiana   
Piedmont    Piedmont
Tables within the notes may not sum across due to (i) Progress Energy's consolidation of Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and other subsidiaries that are not registrants and (ii) subsidiaries that are not registrants but included in the consolidated Duke Energy balances.
1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Nature of Operations and Basis of Consolidation
Duke Energy is an energy company headquartered in Charlotte, North Carolina, subject to regulation by the FERC and other regulatory agencies listed below. Duke Energy operates in the U.S. primarily through its direct and indirect subsidiaries. Certain Duke Energy subsidiaries are also subsidiary registrants, including Duke Energy Carolinas; Progress Energy; Duke Energy Progress; Duke Energy Florida; Duke Energy Ohio; Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont. When discussing Duke Energy’s consolidated financial information, it necessarily includes the results of its separate Subsidiary Registrants, which along with Duke Energy, are collectively referred to as the Duke Energy Registrants.
The information in these combined notes relates to each of the Duke Energy Registrants as noted in the Index to Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. However, none of the Subsidiary Registrants make any representation as to information related solely to Duke Energy or the Subsidiary Registrants of Duke Energy other than itself.
These Consolidated Financial Statements include, after eliminating intercompany transactions and balances, the accounts of the Duke Energy Registrants and subsidiaries or VIEs where the respective Duke Energy Registrants have control. See Note 18 for additional information on VIEs. These Consolidated Financial Statements also reflect the Duke Energy Registrants’ proportionate share of certain jointly owned generation and transmission facilities. See Note 9 for additional information on joint ownership. Substantially all of the Subsidiary Registrants' operations qualify for regulatory accounting.
Duke Energy Carolinas is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. Duke Energy Carolinas is subject to the regulatory provisions of the NCUC, PSCSC, NRC and FERC.
Progress Energy is a public utility holding company, which conducts operations through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida. Progress Energy is subject to regulation by FERC and other regulatory agencies listed below.
Duke Energy Progress is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of North Carolina and South Carolina. Duke Energy Progress is subject to the regulatory provisions of the NCUC, PSCSC, NRC and FERC.
Duke Energy Florida is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of Florida. Duke Energy Florida is subject to the regulatory provisions of the FPSC, NRC and FERC.
Duke Energy Ohio is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the transmission and distribution of electricity in portions of Ohio and Kentucky, the generation and sale of electricity in portions of Kentucky and the transportation and sale of natural gas in portions of Ohio and Kentucky. Duke Energy Ohio conducts competitive auctions for retail electricity supply in Ohio whereby the energy price is recovered from retail customers and recorded in Operating Revenues on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. Operations in Kentucky are conducted through its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky. References herein to Duke Energy Ohio collectively include Duke Energy Ohio and its subsidiaries, unless otherwise noted. Duke Energy Ohio is subject to the regulatory provisions of the PUCO, KPSC and FERC.
Duke Energy Indiana is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity in portions of Indiana. Duke Energy Indiana is subject to the regulatory provisions of the IURC and FERC.
Piedmont is a regulated public utility primarily engaged in the distribution of natural gas in portions of North Carolina, South Carolina and Tennessee. Piedmont is subject to the regulatory provisions of the NCUC, PSCSC, TPUC and FERC.
Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current year presentation.

120




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Other Current Assets and Liabilities
The following table provides a description of amounts included in Other within Current Assets or Current Liabilities that exceed 5% of total Current Assets or Current Liabilities on the Duke Energy Registrants' Consolidated Balance Sheets at either December 31, 2019,2022, or 2018.2021.
   December 31,
(in millions)Location 2019
 2018
Duke Energy     
Taxes receivableCurrent Assets $357
 $729
Accrued compensationCurrent Liabilities 862
 793
Duke Energy Carolinas     
Accrued compensationCurrent Liabilities $271
 $251
Other accrued liabilitiesCurrent Liabilities 147
 55
Progress Energy   
  
Customer depositsCurrent Liabilities $354
 $345
Duke Energy Florida   
  
Customer depositsCurrent Liabilities $209
 $208
Other accrued liabilitiesCurrent Liabilities 89
 85
Duke Energy Indiana   
  
Income taxes receivableCurrent Assets $44
 $9
Customer depositsCurrent Liabilities 49
 47

December 31,
(in millions)Location20222021
Duke Energy
Accrued compensationCurrent Liabilities$778 $915 
Duke Energy Carolinas
Accrued compensationCurrent Liabilities$247 $277 
Duke Energy Progress 
Customer depositsCurrent Liabilities$106 $144 
Other accrued liabilitiesCurrent Liabilities124 163 
Duke Energy Florida 
Customer depositsCurrent Liabilities$200 $200 
Other accrued liabilitiesCurrent Liabilities61 89 
Duke Energy Ohio 
Gas StorageCurrent Assets$57 $25 
Collateral liabilitiesCurrent Liabilities53 57 
Duke Energy Indiana   
Mark-to-market transactionsCurrent Assets$110 $23 
Discontinued Operations
Duke Energy has elected to present cash flows of discontinued operations combined with cash flows of continuing operations. Unless otherwise noted, the notes to these consolidated financial statements exclude amounts related to discontinued operations for all periods presented. See Note 2 for additional information.
Amounts Attributable to Controlling Interests
For the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, the Income (Loss)Loss From Discontinued Operations, net of tax on Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations is entirely attributableincludes amounts related to controlling interest.noncontrolling interests. A portion of Noncontrolling interests on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets relates to discontinued operations for the periods presented. See Note 2 for discussion of discontinued operations related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
Noncontrolling Interest
Duke Energy maintains a controlling financial interest in certain less-thanless than wholly owned non-regulatedregulated and nonregulated subsidiaries. As a result, Duke Energy consolidates these subsidiaries and presents the third-party investors' portion of Duke Energy's net income (loss), net assets and comprehensive income (loss) as noncontrolling interest. Noncontrolling interest is included as a component of equity on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Several operating agreements of Duke Energy's subsidiaries with noncontrolling interest are subject to allocations of tax attributes and cash flows in accordance with contractual agreements that vary throughout the lives of the subsidiaries. Therefore, Duke Energy and the other investors' (the owners) interests in the subsidiaries are not fixed, and the subsidiaries apply the HLBV method in allocating income or loss and other comprehensive income or loss (all measured on a pretax basis) to the owners. The HLBV method measures the amounts that each owner would hypothetically claim at each balance sheet reporting date, including tax benefits realized by the owners, upon a hypothetical liquidation of the subsidiary at the net book value of its underlying assets. The change in the amount that each owner would hypothetically receive at the reporting date compared to the amount it would have received on the previous reporting date represents the amount of income or loss allocated to each owner for the reporting period. During 2019, Duke Energy received $428 million for the sale of noncontrolling interests to tax equity members subject to the HLBV method for projects totaling 718 MW in nameplate capacity. Duke Energy allocated approximately $165 million of losses to noncontrolling tax equity members utilizing the HLBV method for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Other operating Operating agreements of Duke Energy's subsidiaries with noncontrolling interest allocate profit and loss based on their pro rata shares of the ownership interest in the respective subsidiary. Therefore, Duke Energy allocates net income or loss and other comprehensive income or loss of these subsidiaries to the owners based on their pro rata shares.
During the third quarter of 2019, Duke Energy completed a sale of minority interest in a portion of certain renewable assets to John Hancock. John Hancock's ownership interest in the assets represents a noncontrolling interest. See Note 2 for additional information on the sale.
Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates
In preparing financial statements that conform to GAAP, the Duke Energy Registrants must make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the reported amounts of revenues and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

121




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Regulatory Accounting
The majority of the Duke Energy Registrants’ operations are subject to price regulation for the sale of electricity and natural gas by state utility commissions or FERC. When prices are set on the basis of specific costs of the regulated operations and an effective franchise is in place such that sufficient natural gas or electric services can be sold to recover those costs, the Duke Energy Registrants apply regulatory accounting. Regulatory accounting changes the timing of the recognition of costs or revenues relative to a company that does not apply regulatory accounting. As a result, regulatory assets and regulatory liabilities are recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment of the related cost in the ratemaking process. Regulatory assets are reviewed for recoverability each reporting period. If a regulatory asset is no longer deemed probable of recovery, the deferred cost is charged to earnings. See Note 4 for further information.
Regulatory accounting rules also require recognition of a disallowance (also called "impairment") loss if it becomes probable that part of the cost of a plant under construction (or a recently completed plant or an abandoned plant) will be disallowed for ratemaking purposes and a reasonable estimate of the amount of the disallowance can be made. For example, if a cost cap is set for a plant still under construction, the amount of the disallowance is a result of a judgment as to the ultimate cost of the plant. These disallowances can require judgments on allowed future rate recovery.
121

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
When it becomes probable that regulated generation, transmission or distribution assets will be abandoned, the cost of the asset is removed from plant in service. The value that may be retained as a regulatory asset on the balance sheet for the abandoned property is dependent upon amounts that may be recovered through regulated rates, including any return. As such, an impairment charge could be partially or fully offset by the establishment of a regulatory asset if rate recovery is probable. The impairment charge for a disallowance of costs for regulated plants under construction, recently completed or abandoned is based on discounted cash flows.
The Duke Energy Registrants utilize cost-tracking mechanisms, commonly referred to as fuel adjustment clauses or PGA clauses. These clauses allow for the recovery of fuel and fuel-related costs, portions of purchased power, natural gas costs and hedging costs through surcharges on customer rates. The difference between the costs incurred and the surcharge revenues is recorded either as an adjustment to Operating Revenues, Operating Expenses – Fuel used in electric generation or Operating Expenses – Cost of natural gas on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, with an off-setting impact on regulatory assets or liabilities.
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
All highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less at the date of acquisition are considered cash equivalents. Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Florida have restricted cash balances related primarily to collateral assets, escrow deposits and VIEs. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have restricted cash balances related to VIEs from storm recovery bonds issued. See Note 18 for additional information. Restricted cash amounts are included in Other within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following table presents the components of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
Progress
Energy
 Duke
Progress
Energy
 Energy
Energy
Florida
 Energy
Energy
Florida
Current Assets       
Cash and cash equivalents$311
$48
$17
 $442
$67
$36
Other222
39
39
 141
39
39
Other Noncurrent Assets       
Other40
39

 8
6

Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$573
$126
$56
 $591
$112
$75

December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$409 $44 $108 $49 $45 
Other173 8 74 28 41 
Other Noncurrent Assets
Other11 1 2 2  
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$593 $53 $184 $79 $86 

122




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$341 $$70 $35 $23 
Other170 — 39 — 39 
Other Noncurrent Assets
Other— 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash$517 $$113 $39 $62 
Inventory
Inventory related to regulated operations is valued at historical cost. Inventory related to nonregulated operations is valued at the lower of cost or market. Inventory is charged to expense or capitalized to property, plant and equipment when issued, primarily using the average cost method. Excess or obsolete inventory is written-downwritten down to the lower of cost or net realizable value. Once inventory has been written-down,written down, it creates a new cost basis for the inventory that is not subsequently written-up.written up. Provisions for inventory write-offs were not material at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively. The components of inventory are presented in the tables below.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Materials and supplies$2,297
 $768
 $1,038
 $686
 $351
 $79
 $318
 $5
Coal586
 187
 186
 138
 48
 15
 198
 
Natural gas, oil and other349
 41
 199
 110
 90
 41
 1
 67
Total inventory$3,232
 $996
 $1,423
 $934
 $489
 $135
 $517
 $72
December 31, 2018 December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Materials and supplies$2,238
 $731
 $1,049
 $734
 $315
 $84
 $312
 $2
Materials and supplies$2,604 $876 $1,232 $819 $413 $105 $342 $12 
Coal491
 175
 192
 106
 86
 14
 109
 
Coal620 253 190 99 91 34 144  
Natural gas, oil and other355
 42
 218
 114
 103
 28
 1
 68
Natural gas, oil and other360 35 157 88 69 5 3 160 
Total inventory$3,084
 $948
 $1,459
 $954
 $504
 $126
 $422
 $70
Total inventory$3,584 $1,164 $1,579 $1,006 $573 $144 $489 $172 

122

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
 December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Materials and supplies$2,309 $793 $1,067 $729 $338 $80 $311 $14 
Coal486 195 167 94 73 19 105 — 
Natural gas, oil and other316 38 164 98 66 17 95 
Total inventory$3,111 $1,026 $1,398 $921 $477 $116 $418 $109 
Investments in Debt and Equity Securities
The Duke Energy Registrants classify investments in equity securities as FV-NI and investments in debt securities as AFS. Both categories are recorded at fair value on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Realized and unrealized gains and losses on securities classified as FV-NI are reported through net income. Unrealized gains and losses for debt securities classified as AFS are included in AOCI until realized, except OTTIs that are included in earnings immediately. Atunless it is determined the time gains and losses for debt securities are realized, they are reported through net income.carrying value of an investment has a credit loss. For certain investments of regulated operations, such as substantially all of the NDTF, realized and unrealized gains and losses (including any OTTIs)credit losses) on debt securities are recorded as a regulatory asset or liability. The credit loss portion of debt securities of nonregulated operations are included in earnings. Investments in debt and equity securities are classified as either current or noncurrent based on management’s intent and ability to sell these securities, taking into consideration current market liquidity. See Note 16 for further information.
Goodwill
Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont perform annual goodwill impairment tests as of August 31 each year at the reporting unit level, which is determined to be a business segment or one level below. Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont update these tests between annual tests if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. See Note 12 for further information.
Intangible Assets
Intangible assets are included in Other in Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Generally, intangible assets are amortized using an amortization method that reflects the pattern in which the economic benefits of the intangible asset are consumed or on a straight-line basis if that pattern is not readily determinable. Amortization of intangibles is reflected in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Intangible assets are subject to impairment testing and if impaired, the carrying value is accordingly reduced.
Emission allowances permit the holder of the allowance to emit certain gaseous byproducts of fossil fuel combustion, including SO2 and NOX. Allowances are issued by the EPA at zero cost and may also be bought and sold via third-party transactions. Allowances allocated to or acquired by the Duke Energy Registrants are held primarily for consumption. Carrying amounts for emission allowances are based on the cost to acquire the allowances. Emission allowances are expensed to Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
RECs are used to measure compliance with renewable energy standards and are held primarily for consumption. See Note 12 for further information.

123




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Long-Lived Asset Impairments
The Duke Energy Registrants evaluate long-lived assets that are held and used, excluding goodwill, for impairment when circumstances indicate the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. An impairment exists when a long-lived asset’s carrying value exceeds the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. The estimated cash flows may be based on alternative expected outcomes that are probability weighted. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable based on these estimated future undiscounted cash flows, the carrying value of the asset is written-downwritten down to its then-currentthen current estimated fair value and an impairment charge is recognized.
The Duke Energy Registrants assess fair value of long-lived assets that are held and used using various methods, including recent comparable third-party sales, internally developed discounted cash flow analysis and analysis from outside advisors. Triggering events to reassess cash flows may include, but are not limited to, significant changes in commodity prices, the condition of an asset or management’s interest in selling the asset.
Equity Method Investment Impairments
123

Investments in affiliates that are not controlled by Duke Energy, but over which it has significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method. Equity method investments are assessed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the investment may not be recoverable. If the decline in value is considered to be other than temporary, the investment is written down to its estimated fair value, which establishes a new cost basis in the investment.
Impairment assessments use a discounted cash flow income approach and include consideration of the severity and duration of any decline in the fair value of the investments. The estimated cash flows may be based on alternative expected outcomes that are probability weighted. Key inputs that involve estimates and significant management judgment include cash flow projections, selection of a discount rate, probability weighting of potential outcomes, and whether any decline in value is considered temporary.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment are stated at the lower of depreciated historical cost net of any disallowances or fair value, if impaired. The Duke Energy Registrants capitalize all construction-related direct labor and material costs, as well as indirect construction costs such as general engineering, taxes and financing costs. See “Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalized” section below for information on capitalized financing costs. Costs of renewals and betterments that extend the useful life of property, plant and equipment are also capitalized. The cost of repairs, replacements and major maintenance projects, which do not extend the useful life or increase the expected output of the asset, are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is generally computed over the estimated useful life of the asset using the composite straight-line method. Depreciation studies are conducted periodically to update composite rates and are approved by state utility commissions and/or the FERC when required. The composite weighted average depreciation rates, excluding nuclear fuel, are included in the table that follows.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019
 2018
 2017
Duke Energy3.1% 3.0% 2.8%
Duke Energy Carolinas2.8% 2.8% 2.8%
Progress Energy3.1% 2.9% 2.6%
Duke Energy Progress3.1% 2.9% 2.6%
Duke Energy Florida3.1% 3.0% 2.8%
Duke Energy Ohio2.6% 2.8% 2.8%
Duke Energy Indiana3.3% 3.3% 3.0%
Piedmont2.4% 2.5% 2.3%

 Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Duke Energy3.0 %2.9 %3.0 %
Duke Energy Carolinas2.7 %2.7 %2.8 %
Progress Energy3.2 %3.1 %3.2 %
Duke Energy Progress3.0 %3.0 %3.1 %
Duke Energy Florida3.5 %3.3 %3.3 %
Duke Energy Ohio2.9 %2.9 %2.9 %
Duke Energy Indiana3.6 %3.6 %3.5 %
Piedmont2.1 %2.1 %2.3 %
In general, when the Duke Energy Registrants retire regulated property, plant and equipment, the original cost plus the cost of retirement, less salvage value and any depreciation already recognized, is charged to accumulated depreciation. However, when it becomes probable the asset will be retired substantially in advance of its original expected useful life or is abandoned, the cost of the asset and the corresponding accumulated depreciation is recognized as a separate asset. If the asset is still in operation, the net amount is classified as Generation facilitiesFacilities to be retired, net on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. If the asset is no longer operating, the net amount is classified in Regulatory assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets if deemed recoverable (see discussion of long-lived asset impairments above). The carrying value of the asset is based on historical cost if the Duke Energy Registrants are allowed to recover the remaining net book value and a return equal to at least the incremental borrowing rate. If not, an impairment is recognized to the extent the net book value of the asset exceeds the present value of future revenues discounted at the incremental borrowing rate.
When the Duke Energy Registrants sell entire regulated operating units, or retire or sell nonregulated properties, the original cost and accumulated depreciation and amortization balances are removed from Property, Plant and Equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any gain or loss is recorded in earnings, unless otherwise required by the applicable regulatory body. See Note 11 for additional information.
Other Noncurrent Assets
Duke Energy, through a nonregulated subsidiary, was the winner of the Carolina Long Bay offshore wind auction in May 2022 and recorded an
asset of $150 million related to the contract in Other within Other noncurrent assets. In November 2022, Duke Energy committed to a plan to sell the Commercial Renewables business segment, excluding the offshore wind contract for Carolina Long Bay, which was moved to the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure (EU&I) segment. See Notes 2 and 3 for further information.
Leases
Duke Energy determines if an arrangement is a lease at contract inception based on whether the arrangement involves the use of a physically distinct identified asset and whether Duke Energy has the right to obtain substantially all of the economic benefits from the use of the asset throughout the period as well as the right to direct the use of the asset. As a policy election, Duke Energy does not evaluate arrangements with initial contract terms of less than one year as leases.
Operating leases are included in Operating lease ROU assets, net, Other current liabilities and Operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finance leases are included in Property, plant and equipment, Current maturities of long-term debt and Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
For lessee and lessor arrangements, Duke Energy has elected a policy to not separate lease and non-lease components for all asset classes. For lessor arrangements, lease and non-lease components are only combined under one arrangement and accounted for under the lease accounting framework if the non-lease components are not the predominant component of the arrangement and the lease component would be classified as an operating lease.
Nuclear Fuel
Nuclear fuel is classified as Property, Plant and Equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Nuclear fuel in the front-end fuel processing phase is considered work in progress and not amortized until placed in service. Amortization of nuclear fuel is included within Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amortization is recorded using the units-of-production method.

124




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Allowance for Funds Used During Construction and Interest Capitalized
For regulated operations, the debt and equity costs of financing the construction of property, plant and equipment are reflected as AFUDC and capitalized as a component of the cost of property, plant and equipment. AFUDC equity is reported on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as non-cash income in Other income and expenses, net. AFUDC debt is reported as a non-cash offset to Interest Expense. After construction is completed, the Duke Energy Registrants are permitted to recover these costs through their inclusion in rate base and the corresponding subsequent depreciation or amortization of those regulated assets.
AFUDC equity, a permanent difference for income taxes, reduces the ETR when capitalized and increases the ETR when depreciated or amortized. See Note 24 for additional information.
For nonregulated operations, interest is capitalized during the construction phase with an offsetting non-cash credit to Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Asset Retirement Obligations
AROs are recognized for legal obligations associated with the retirement of property, plant and equipment. Substantially all AROs are related to regulated operations. When recording an ARO, the present value of the projected liability is recognized in the period in which it is incurred, if a reasonable estimate of fair value can be made. The liability is accreted over time. For operating plants, the present value of the liability is added to the cost of the associated asset and depreciated over the remaining life of the asset. For retired plants, the present value of the liability is recorded as a regulatory asset unless determined not to be probable of recovery.
The present value of the initial obligation and subsequent updates are based on discounted cash flows, which include estimates regarding timing of future cash flows, selection of discount rates and cost escalation rates, among other factors. These estimates are subject to change. Depreciation expense is adjusted prospectively for any changes to the carrying amount of the associated asset. The Duke Energy Registrants receive amounts to fund the cost of the ARO for regulated operations through a combination of regulated revenues and earnings on the NDTF. As a result, amounts recovered in regulated revenues, earnings on the NDTF, accretion expense and depreciation of the associated asset are netted and deferred as a regulatory asset or liability.
Obligations for nuclear decommissioningAccounts Payable
During 2020, Duke Energy established a supply chain finance program (the “program”) with a global financial institution. The program is voluntary and allows Duke Energy suppliers, at their sole discretion, to sell their receivables from Duke Energy to the financial institution at a rate that leverages Duke Energy’s credit rating and, which may result in favorable terms compared to the rate available to the supplier on their own credit rating. Suppliers participating in the program, determine at their sole discretion which invoices they will sell to the financial institution. Suppliers’ decisions on which invoices are sold do not impact Duke Energy’s payment terms, which are based on site-specific cost studies.commercial terms negotiated between Duke Energy Carolinas and the supplier regardless of program participation. The commercial terms negotiated between Duke Energy Progress assume prompt dismantlementand its suppliers are consistent regardless of whether the nuclear facilities after operations are ceased. In 2019,supplier elects to participate in the program. Duke Energy Florida entered into an agreement fordoes not issue any guarantees with respect to the accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3. See Note 4 for more information.program and does not participate in negotiations between suppliers and the financial institution. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progressdoes not have an economic interest in the supplier’s decision to participate in the program and Duke Energy Florida also assume that spent fuel will be stored on-site until such time that it can be transferredreceives no interest, fees or other benefit from the financial institution based on supplier participation in the program.
The following table presents the outstanding accounts payable balance sold to a yetthe financial institution by our suppliers and the supplier invoices sold to be built DOE facility.the financial institution under the program included within Net cash provided by operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows as of December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021.
Obligations for closure of ash basins are based upon discounted cash flows of estimated costs for site-specific plans, if known, or probability weightings of the potential closure methods if the closure plans are under development and multiple closure options are being considered and evaluated on a site-by-site basis. See Note 10 for additional information.
 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Outstanding Accounts Payable Balance Sold$87 $6 $19 $8 $11 $5 $ $57 
Suppliers Invoices Settled Through The Program301 29 85 26 59 38 2 147 
December 30, 2021
DukeDuke
DukeProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyEnergyFloridaOhioPiedmont
Outstanding Accounts Payable Balance Sold$19 $$$$
Suppliers Invoices Settled Through The Program122 10 10 12 100 
Revenue Recognition
Duke Energy recognizes revenue as customers obtain control of promised goods and services in an amount that reflects consideration expected in exchange for those goods or services. Generally, the delivery of electricity and natural gas results in the transfer of control to customers at the time the commodity is delivered and the amount of revenue recognized is equal to the amount billed to each customer, including estimated volumes delivered when billings have not yet occurred. See Note 19 for further information.
125

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Derivatives and Hedging
Derivative and non-derivative instruments may be used in connection with commodity price and interest rate activities, including swaps, futures, forwards and options. All derivative instruments, except those that qualify for the NPNS exception, are recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at fair value. Qualifying derivative instruments may be designated as either cash flow hedges or fair value hedges. Other derivative instruments (undesignated contracts) either have not been designated or do not qualify as hedges. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of cash flow hedges is recorded in AOCI. The effective portion of the change in the fair value of a fair value hedge is offset in net income by changes in the hedged item. For activity subject to regulatory accounting, gains and losses on derivative contracts are reflected as regulatory assets or liabilities and not as other comprehensive income or current period income. As a result, changes in fair value of these derivatives have no immediate earnings impact.
Formal documentation, including transaction type and risk management strategy, is maintained for all contracts accounted for as a hedge. At inception and at least every three months thereafter, the hedge contract is assessed to see if it is highly effective in offsetting changes in cash flows or fair values of hedged items.
See Note 15 for further information.
Captive Insurance Reserves
Duke Energy has captive insurance subsidiaries that provide coverage, on an indemnity basis, to the Subsidiary Registrants as well as certain third parties, on a limited basis, for financial losses, primarily related to property, workers’ compensation and general liability. Liabilities include provisions for estimated losses incurred but not reported (IBNR), as well as estimated provisions for known claims. IBNR reserve estimates are primarily based upon historical loss experience, industry data and other actuarial assumptions. Reserve estimates are adjusted in future periods as actual losses differ from experience.
Duke Energy, through its captive insurance entities, also has reinsurance coverage with third parties for certain losses above a per occurrence and/or aggregate retention. Receivables for reinsurance coverage are recognized when realization is deemed probable.

125




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Unamortized Debt Premium, Discount and Expense
Premiums, discounts and expenses incurred with the issuance of outstanding long-term debt are amortized over the term of the debt issue. The gain or loss on extinguishment associated with refinancing higher-cost debt obligations in the regulated operations is amortized over the remaining life of the original instrument. Amortization expense is recorded as Interest Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and is reflected as Depreciation, amortization and accretion within Net cash provided by operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Premiums, discounts and expenses are presented as an adjustment to the carrying value of the debt amount and included in Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets presented.
Preferred Stock
Preferred stock is reviewed to determine the appropriate balance sheet classification and embedded features, such as call options, are evaluated to determine if they should be bifurcated and accounted for separately. Costs directly related to the issuance of preferred stock isare recorded as a reduction of the proceeds received. The liability for the dividend is recognized when declared. The accumulated dividends on the cumulative preferred stock is recognized to net income available to Duke Energy Corporation in the EPS calculation. See Note 20 for further information.
Loss Contingencies and Environmental Liabilities
Contingent losses are recorded when it is probable a loss has occurred and the loss can be reasonably estimated. When a range of the probable loss exists and no amount within the range is a better estimate than any other amount, the minimum amount in the range is recorded. Unless otherwise required by GAAP, legal fees are expensed as incurred.
Environmental liabilities are recorded on an undiscounted basis when environmental remediation or other liabilities become probable and can be reasonably estimated. Environmental expenditures related to past operations that do not generate current or future revenues are expensed. Environmental expenditures related to operations that generate current or future revenues are expensed or capitalized, as appropriate. Certain environmental expenditures receive regulatory accounting treatment and are recorded as regulatory assets.
See Notes 4 and 5 for further information.
Pension and Other Post-Retirement Benefit Plans
Duke Energy maintains qualified, non-qualified and other post-retirement benefit plans. Eligible employees of the Subsidiary Registrants participate in the respective qualified, non-qualified and other post-retirement benefit plans and the Subsidiary Registrants are allocated their proportionate share of benefit costs. See Note 23 for further information, including significant accounting policies associated with these plans.
Severance and Special Termination Benefits
Duke Energy hasmaintains severance plans for the general employee population under which, in general, the longer a terminated employee worked prior to termination the greater the amount of severance benefits.benefits provided. A liability for involuntary severance is recorded once an involuntary severance plan is committed to by management if involuntary severances are probable and can be reasonably estimated. For involuntary severance benefits incremental to its ongoing severance plan benefits, the fair value of the obligation is expensed at the communication date if there are no future service requirements or over the required future service period. Duke Energy also offers special termination benefits under voluntary severance programs. Special termination benefits are recorded immediately upon employee acceptance absent a significant retention period. Otherwise, the cost is recorded over the remaining service period. Employee acceptance of voluntary severance benefits is determined by management based on the facts and circumstances of the benefits being offered. See Note 21 for further information.
Guarantees
If necessary, liabilities are recognized at the time of issuance or material modification of a guarantee for the estimated fair value of the obligation it assumes. Fair value is estimated using a probability-weightedprobability weighted approach. The obligation is reduced over the term of the guarantee or related contract in a systematic and rational method as risk is reduced. Any additional contingentDuke Energy recognizes a liability for the best estimate of its loss for guarantee contracts subsequentdue to the initial recognitionnonperformance of athe guaranteed party. This liability is accounted for and recognized at the timeinception of a lossguarantee and is probable and can be reasonably estimated.updated periodically. See Note 8 for further information.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation represents costs related to stock-based awards granted to employees and Board of Directors members. Duke Energy recognizes stock-based compensation based upon the estimated fair value of awards, net of estimated forfeitures at the date of issuance. The recognition period for these costs begins at either the applicable service inception date or grant date and continues throughout the requisite service period. Compensation cost is recognized as expense or capitalized as a component of property, plant and equipment. See Note 22 for further information.
Income Taxes
Duke Energy and its subsidiaries file a consolidated federal income tax return and other state and foreign jurisdictional returns. The Subsidiary Registrants are parties to a tax-sharing agreement with Duke Energy. Income taxes recorded represent amounts the Subsidiary Registrants would incur as separate C-Corporations. Deferred income taxes have been provided for temporary differences between GAAP and tax bases of assets and liabilities because the differences create taxable or tax-deductible amounts for future periods. ITCs associated with regulated operations are deferred and amortized as a reduction of income tax expense over the estimated useful lives of the related properties.

126




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Accumulated deferred income taxes are valued using the enacted tax rate expected to apply to taxable income in the periods in which the deferred tax asset or liability is expected to be settled or realized. In the event of a change in tax rates, deferred tax assets and liabilities are remeasured as of the enactment date of the new rate. To the extent that the change in the value of the deferred tax represents an obligation to customers, the impact of the remeasurement is deferred to a regulatory liability. Remaining impacts are recorded in income from continuing operations. If Duke Energy's results of operations could be impacted if the estimate of the tax effect of reversing temporary differences is not reflective of actual outcomes, is modified to reflect new developments or interpretations of the tax law, revised to incorporate new accounting principles, or changes in the expected timing or manner of the reversal then Duke Energy's results of operations could be impacted.a reversal.
Tax-related interest and penalties are recorded in Interest Expense and Other Income and Expenses, net in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
See Note 24 for further information.
Accounting for Renewable Energy Tax Credits
When Duke Energy receives ITCs on wind or solar facilities, it reduces the basis of the property recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets by the amount of the ITC and, therefore, the ITC benefit is ultimately recognized in the statement of operations through reduced depreciation expense. Additionally, certain tax credits and government grants result in an initial tax depreciable base in excess of the book carrying value by an amount equal to one half of the ITC. Deferred tax benefits are recorded as a reduction to income tax expense in the period that the basis difference is created.
Duke Energy receives PTCs on wind facilities that are recognized as electricity is produced.
Excise Taxes
Certain excise taxes levied by state or local governments are required to be paid even if not collected from the customer. These taxes are recognized on a gross basis. Taxes for which Duke Energy operates merely as a collection agent for the state and local government are accounted for on a net basis. Excise taxes accounted for on a gross basis within both Operating Revenues and Property and other taxes in the Consolidated Statements of Operations were as follows.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
Duke Energy$421
 $405
 $376
Duke Energy Carolinas39
 35
 36
Progress Energy256
 241
 220
Duke Energy Progress21
 19
 19
Duke Energy Florida235
 222
 201
Duke Energy Ohio101
 105
 98
Duke Energy Indiana23
 22
 20
Piedmont2
 2
 2

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Duke Energy$449 $420 $415 
Duke Energy Carolinas47 44 43 
Progress Energy290 250 249 
Duke Energy Progress25 22 26 
Duke Energy Florida265 228 223 
Duke Energy Ohio104 102 96 
Duke Energy Indiana7 23 25 
Piedmont1 
Dividend Restrictions and Unappropriated Retained Earnings
Duke Energy does not have any current legal, regulatory or other restrictions on paying common stock dividends to shareholders. However, if Duke Energy were to defer dividend payments on the preferred stock, the declaration of common stock dividends would be prohibited. See Note 20 for more information. Additionally, as further described in Note 4, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont have restrictions on paying dividends or otherwise advancing funds to Duke Energy due to conditions established by regulators in conjunction with merger transaction approvals. At December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, an insignificant amount of Duke Energy’s consolidated Retained earnings balance represents undistributed earnings of equity method investments.
New Accounting Standards
Except as noted below, the new accounting standards adopted for 2019, 2018 and 2017 had no material impact on the presentation or results of operations, cash flows or financial position of the Duke Energy Registrants.
Leases. In February 2016, the FASB issued revised accounting guidance for leases. The core principle of this guidance is that a lessee should recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet. This resulted in a material impact on the presentation for the statement of financial position of the Duke Energy Registrants for the period ended December 31, 2019, and an immaterial impact to the Duke Energy Registrants' results of operations and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Duke Energy elected the modified retrospective method of adoption effective January 1, 2019. Under the modified retrospective method of adoption, prior year reported results are not restated. For adoption, Duke Energy elected to apply the following practical expedients:

127




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Practical ExpedientDescription
Package of transition practical expedients (for leases commenced prior to adoption date and must be adopted as a package)Do not need to 1) reassess whether any expired or existing contracts are/or contain leases, 2) reassess the lease classification for any expired or existing leases and 3) reassess initial direct costs for any existing leases.
Short-term lease expedient (elect by class of underlying asset)Elect as an accounting policy to not apply the recognition requirements to short-term leases by asset class.
Lease and non-lease components (elect by class of underlying asset)Elect as an accounting policy to not separate non-lease components from lease components and instead account for each lease and associated non-lease component as a single lease component by asset class.
Hindsight expedient (when determining lease term)Elect to use hindsight to determine the lease term.
Existing and expired land easements not previously accounted for as leasesElect to not evaluate existing or expired easements under the new guidance and carry forward current accounting treatment.
Comparative reporting requirements for initial adoption

Elect to apply transition requirements at adoption date, recognize cumulative effect adjustment to retained earnings in period of adoption and not apply the new requirements to comparative periods, including disclosures.
Lessor expedient (elect by class of underlying asset)

Elect as an accounting policy to aggregate non-lease components with the related lease component when specified conditions are met by asset class. Account for the combined component based on its predominant characteristic (revenue or operating lease).
Duke Energy evaluated the financial statement impact of adopting the standard and monitored industry implementation issues. Under agreements considered leases, where Duke Energy is the lessee, for the use of certain aircraft, space on communication towers, industrial equipment, fleet vehicles, fuel transportation (barges and railcars), land, office space and PPAs are now recognized on the balance sheet. The Duke Energy Registrants did not have a material change to the financial statements from the adoption of the new standard for contracts where it is the lessor. See Note 6 for further information.
The following new accounting standard has been issued but not yetwas adopted by the Duke Energy Registrants in 2021.
Leases with Variable Lease Payments. In July 2021, the FASB issued new accounting guidance requiring lessors to classify a lease with variable lease payments that do not depend on a reference index or rate as an operating lease if both of December 31, 2019.the following are met: (1) the lease would have to be classified as a sales-type or direct financing lease under prior guidance, and (2) the lessor would have recognized a day-one loss. Duke Energy elected to adopt the guidance immediately upon issuance of the new standard and will be applying the new standard prospectively to new lease arrangements meeting the criteria. Duke Energy did not have any lease arrangements that this new accounting guidance materially impacted.
The following accounting standard was adopted by the Duke Energy Registrants in 2020.
Current Expected Credit Losses. In June 2016, the FASB issued new accounting guidance for credit losses. This guidance establishes a new impairment model applicable to certain financial assets, including trade and other receivables, net investments in leases, and debt securities classified as held-for-sale investments. The model also applies to financial guarantees.
For Duke Energy adopted the new accounting guidance isfor credit losses effective for interim and annual periods beginning January 1, 2020. This guidance will be applied2020, using a modified retrospective approach. Under the modified retrospective approachmethod of adoption, which does not require restatement of prior year reported results are not restated and a cumulative-effect adjustment is recorded to retained earnings at January 1, 2020.
Upon adoption,results. Duke Energy will recognize an allowancedid not adopt any practical expedients.
Duke Energy recognizes allowances for credit losses based on management's estimate of losses expected to be incurred over the lives of certain assets or guarantees. Duke Energy expects the impacts of this standard to be driven by the reserve for credit losses on financial guarantees, trade and other receivables, and insurance receivables. Duke Energy does not intend to adopt any practical expedients.
Duke Energy currently expects to record a reserve for credit losses as shown in approximate amounts in the table below:
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Piedmont
Total pretax impact to Retained Earnings$120
 $16
 $2
 $1
 $1
 $1

In addition to the reserve for credit losses, Duke Energy expects additional disclosures on management's evaluation of credit risks inherent in financial assets and how managementManagement monitors credit quality, changes in expected credit losses and the appropriateness of the allowance for credit losses on a forward-looking basis. Management reviews the risk of loss periodically as part of the existing assessment of collectability of receivables.
Duke Energy also expects additional disclosures aroundreviews the credit quality of its counterparties as part of its regular risk management process and requires credit enhancements, such as deposits or letters of credit, as appropriate and as allowed by regulators.
Duke Energy recorded cumulative effects of changes in accounting principles related to the adoption of the new credit loss standard for allowances and credit losses for new investments in leases, loan commitments,of trade and other receivables, insurance receivables and financial instruments.
2. ACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONS
ACQUISITIONS
The Duke Energy Registrants consolidate assetsguarantees. These amounts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Receivables, Receivables of VIEs, Other Noncurrent Assets and liabilities from acquisitions as of the purchase dateOther Noncurrent Liabilities. See Notes 8 and include earnings from acquisitions in consolidated earnings after the purchase date.

19 for more information.
128
127




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSACQUISITIONS AND DISPOSITIONSSUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


2016 Acquisition of Piedmont Natural Gas
On October 3, 2016, Duke Energy acquired all outstanding common stock of Piedmont for a total cash purchase price of $5 billion and assumed Piedmont's existing long-term debt, which had a fair value of approximately $2 billion at the time of the acquisition. The acquisition provides a foundation for Duke Energy to establish a broader, long-term strategic natural gas infrastructure platform to complement its existing natural gas pipeline investments and regulated natural gas business in the Midwest. In connection with the closing of the acquisition, Piedmont became a wholly owned subsidiary of Duke Energy.
Accounting Charges Related to the Acquisition
Duke Energy incurred pretax transaction and integration costs associated with the acquisition of $84 million and $103 millionrecorded an adjustment for the years ended December 31, 2018,cumulative effect of a change in accounting principle due to the adoption of this standard on January 1, 2020, as shown in the table below:
 January 1, 2020
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaPiedmont
Total pretax impact to Retained Earnings$120 $16 $2 $1 $1 $1 
2. DISPOSITIONS
The following table summarizes the Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax recorded on Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations:
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups$(1,349)$(151)$(14)
Other(a)
26 
Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax$(1,323)$(144)$(7)
(a)     Amount represents an income tax benefit resulting from tax adjustments for previously sold businesses not related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
Sale of Commercial Renewables Segment
In August 2022, Duke Energy announced a strategic review of its commercial renewables business. Since 2007, Duke Energy has built a portfolio of commercial wind, solar and 2017, respectively. Amounts recordedbattery projects across the U.S., and established a development pipeline. Duke Energy has developed a strategy to focus on renewables, grid and other investment opportunities within its regulated operations. In November 2022, Duke Energy committed to a plan to sell the Commercial Renewables business segment, excluding the offshore wind contract for Carolina Long Bay, which was moved to the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure (EU&I) segment. Duke Energy is actively marketing the business as two separate disposal groups, the utility-scale solar and wind group and the distributed generation group (collectively, Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups). The sales processes for both Disposal Groups are ongoing and Duke Energy expects to dispose of these groups in the second half of 2023.
Assets Held For Sale and Discontinued Operations
The Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups were classified as held for sale and as discontinued operations in the fourth quarter of 2022. No adjustments were made to the historical activity within the Consolidated Statements of OperationsComprehensive Income, Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows or the Consolidated Statements of Changes in 2018 and 2017 were primarily system integration costs of $78 million and $71 million, respectively,Equity. Unless otherwise noted, the notes to these consolidated financial statements exclude amounts related to combiningdiscontinued operations for all periods presented.
128

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDISPOSITIONS

The following table presents the various operationalcarrying values of the major classes of Assets held for sale and financial systemsLiabilities associated with assets held for sale included in Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Current Assets Held for Sale
Cash and cash equivalents$10 $
Receivables, net107 87 
Inventory88 86 
Other57 56 
Total current assets held for sale262 232 
Noncurrent Assets Held for Sale
Property, Plant and Equipment
Cost6,444 7,323 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1,651)(1,452)
Net property, plant and equipment4,793 5,871 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net140 130 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates522 513 
Other179 181 
Total other noncurrent assets held for sale841 824 
Total Assets Held for Sale$5,896 $6,927 
Current Liabilities Associated with Assets Held for Sale
Accounts payable$122 $98 
Taxes accrued17 18 
Other120 51 
Total current liabilities associated with assets held for sale259 167 
Noncurrent Liabilities Associated with Assets Held for Sale
Operating lease liabilities150 134 
Asset retirement obligations190 175 
Other399 303 
Total other noncurrent liabilities associated with assets held for sale739 612 
Total Liabilities Associated with Assets Held for Sale$998 $779 
As of December 31, 2022, the noncontrolling interest balance is $1.6 billion.
The following table presents the results of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups, which are included in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax in Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Operating revenues$465 $476 $502 
Operation, maintenance and other337343292
Depreciation and amortization(a)
201227200
Property and other taxes363426
Other income and expenses, net2 (27)1
Interest expense107266
Loss on disposal1,748 — — 
Loss before income taxes(1,865)(227)(81)
Income tax benefit(516)(76)(67)
Loss from discontinued operations$(1,349)$(151)$(14)
Add: Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interest included in discontinued operations108 344 296 
Net income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation$(1,241)$193 $282 
(a)    Upon meeting the criteria for assets held for sale, beginning in November 2022 depreciation and amortization expense were ceased.
129

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDISPOSITIONS

The Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups' held for sale assets included pretax impairments of approximately $1.7 billion for the year ended December 31, 2022. The impairment was recorded to write-down the carrying amount of the property, plant and equipment assets to the estimated fair value of the business, based on the expected selling price less estimated cost to sell. These losses were included in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax in Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The fair value was primarily determined from the income approach using discounted cash flows but also considered market information obtained through the bidding process. The discounted cash flow model utilized Level 2 and Level 3 inputs. The fair value hierarchy levels are further discussed in Note 17. The impairment will be updated, if necessary, based on the final sales price, after any adjustments at closing for working capital and capital expenditures.
Duke Energy has elected not to separately disclose discontinued operations on Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The following table summarizes Duke Energy's cash flows from discontinued operations related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Cash flows provided by (used in):
Operating activities$213 $62 $466 
Investing activities(802)(542)(1,102)
Other Sale Related Matters
Several Duke Energy renewables project companies, located in the Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) market, were named in several lawsuits arising out of Texas Storm Uri, which occurred in February 2021. The legal actions related to these lawsuits will remain with Duke Energy and Piedmont,any future activity related to the matters will be presented in discontinued operations. See Note 5 for more information.
The Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups' debt and related interest rate swaps have not been classified as held for sale as they are not currently expected transfer to the buyer, but would be required to be extinguished as a result of the disposition. As of December 31, 2022, the balance of long-term debt including current maturities is $1.5 billion. If the debt and related interest rate swaps do not transfer to the buyer and are terminated early, the expected total loss on extinguishment is approximately $100 million, of which approximately $55 million is expected to be attributable to Duke Energy. The loss would be recorded in discontinued operations when the debt and swaps are terminated. Hedge accounting was discontinued on the related interest rate swaps when the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups were classified as held for sale as the forecasted transactions being hedged are no longer probable. As a one-time software impairment resulting from planned accounting system and process integration in 2017. A $7result, a gain of $72 million charge was recorded within Impairment Charges,in Loss from Discontinued Operations, net of tax in Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations as of December 31, 2022, of which $54 million is attributable to Duke Energy.
Interest expense and debt issuance costs directly associated with the remaining $64 million recorded within Operation, maintenance and other in 2017.Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups was allocated to discontinued operations. No interest from corporate level debt was allocated to discontinued operations.
The majorityCommercial Renewables Disposal Groups have entered into negotiations to modify or terminate certain PPAs under which the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups sell power and RECs from renewable projects to offtakers. Duke Energy expects to pay offtakers approximately $95 million to modify the agreements. Charges related to the modifications will be reflected within Loss From Discontinued Operations in Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of transition and integration activities were completed by the endOperations.
Sale of 2018.
DISPOSITIONSMinority Interest in Duke Energy Indiana Holdco, LLC
On April 24, 2019,January 28, 2021, Duke Energy executed an agreement to sellproviding for an investment by an affiliate of GIC in Duke Energy Indiana in exchange for a 19.9% minority interest in a portionissued by Duke Energy Indiana Holdco, LLC, the holding company for Duke Energy Indiana. The transaction was completed following two closings for an aggregate purchase price of certain renewable assets within the Commercial Renewables segment.approximately $2.05 billion. The sale closedfirst closing, which occurred on September 6, 2019,8, 2021, resulted in Duke Energy Indiana Holdco, LLC issuing 11.05% of its membership interests in exchange for approximately $1.03 billion or 50% of the purchase price. The difference between the cash consideration received, net of transaction costs of approximately $27 million, and the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest is $545 million and was recorded as an increase to equity. The second closing was completed in December 2022 and resulted in pretax proceeds to Duke Energy Indiana Holdco, LLC issuing an additional 8.85% of $415 million.its membership interests in exchange for approximately $1.03 billion. The portiondifference between the cash consideration received, net of Duke Energy’s commercial renewables energy portfolio sold includes 49%transaction costs of 37 operating wind, solarapproximately $6 million, and battery storage assetsthe carrying value of the noncontrolling interest is $492 million and 33% of 11 operating solar assets across the U.S.was recorded as an increase to equity. Duke Energy retained indirect control of these assets, and, therefore, no gain or loss was recognized on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The difference between the consideration received and the carrying value of the noncontrolling interest claim on net assets is $466 million, net of a tax benefit of $8 million, and was recorded in equity.Operations for either transaction.
3. BUSINESS SEGMENTS
Reportable segments are determined based on information used by the chief operating decision-maker in deciding how to allocate resources and evaluate the performance of the business. Duke Energy evaluates segment performance based on segment income. Segment income is defined as income from continuing operations net of income attributable to noncontrolling interests.interests and preferred stock dividends. Segment income, as discussed below, includes intercompany revenues and expenses that are eliminated on the Consolidated Financial Statements. Certain governance costs are allocated to each segment. In addition, direct interest expense and income taxes are included in segment income.
Products and services are sold between affiliate companies and reportable segments of Duke Energy at cost. Segment assets as presented in the tables that follow exclude all intercompany assets.
Duke Energy
Due to Duke Energy's commitment in the fourth quarter of 2022 to sell the Commercial Renewables business segment, Duke Energy's segment structure now includes the following two segments: Electric UtilitiesEU&I and Infrastructure, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure andGU&I. Prior period information has been recast to conform to the current segment structure. See Note 2 for further information on the Commercial Renewables.Renewables Disposal Groups.
130

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS
The Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I segment includes Duke Energy's regulated electric utilities in the Carolinas, Florida and the Midwest. The regulated electric utilities conduct operations through the Subsidiary Registrants that are substantially all regulated and, accordingly, qualify for regulatory accounting treatment. Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I also includes Duke Energy's electric transmission infrastructure investments.investments and the offshore wind contract for Carolina Long Bay. Refer to Note 2 for further information.
The Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I segment includes Piedmont, Duke Energy's natural gas local distribution companies in Ohio and Kentucky, and Duke Energy's natural gas storage, and midstream pipeline, and renewable natural gas investments. Gas Utilities and Infrastructure'sGU&I's operations are substantially all regulated and, accordingly, qualify for regulatory accounting treatment.
The Commercial Renewables segment is primarily comprised of nonregulated utility-scale wind and solar generation assets located throughout the U.S. On April 24, 2019, Duke Energy executed an agreement to sell a minority interest in a portion of certain renewable assets. See Note 2 for additional information on the minority interest sale.
The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other, which is primarily comprised of interest expense on holding company debt, unallocated corporate costs and Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance company, Bison. Other also includes Duke Energy's interest in NMC. See Note 13 for additional information on the investment in NMC.

129




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS


Business segment information is presented in the following tables. Segment assets presented exclude intercompany assets.
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2022
Electric
 Gas
   Total
      ElectricGasTotal
Utilities and
 Utilities and
 Commercial
 Reportable
      Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)Infrastructure
 Infrastructure
 Renewables
 Segments
 Other
 Eliminations
 Total
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Unaffiliated Revenues$22,798
 $1,770
 $487
 $25,055
 $24
 $
 $25,079
Unaffiliated Revenues$25,990 $2,748 $28,738 $30 $ $28,768 
Intersegment Revenues33
 96
 
 129
 71
 (200) 
Intersegment Revenues34 92 126 92 (218) 
Total Revenues$22,831
 $1,866
 $487
 $25,184
 $95
 $(200) $25,079
Total Revenues$26,024 $2,840 $28,864 $122 $(218)$28,768 
Interest Expense$1,345
 $117
 $95
 $1,557
 $705
 $(58) $2,204
Interest Expense$1,565 $182 $1,747 $778 $(86)$2,439 
Depreciation and amortization3,951
 256
 168
 4,375
 178
 (5) 4,548
Depreciation and amortization4,550 327 4,877 236 (27)5,086 
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates9
 114
 (4) 119
 43
 
 162
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliatesEquity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates7 20 27 86  113 
Income tax expense (benefit)785
 22
 (115) 692
 (173) 
 519
Income tax expense (benefit)536 8 544 (244) 300 
Segment income (loss)(a)(b)
3,536
 432
 198
 4,166
 (452) 
 3,714
Segment income (loss)(a)(b)
3,929 468 4,397 (737)(1)3,659 
Add back noncontrolling interest(c)
  
   
   
   
   
   
 (177)
Less noncontrolling interestLess noncontrolling interest95 
Add back preferred stock dividend            41
Add back preferred stock dividend106 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  
   
   
   
   
   
 (7)
Discontinued operationsDiscontinued operations(1,215)
Net income  
   
   
   
   
   
 $3,571
Net income$2,455 
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions$8,263
 $1,539
 $1,423
 $11,225
 $221
 $
 $11,446
Segment assets135,561
 13,921
 6,020
 155,502
 3,148
 188
 158,838
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions(c)
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions(c)
$8,985 $1,295 $10,280 $1,139 $ $11,419 
Segment assets(d)
Segment assets(d)
152,104 16,411 168,515 9,571  178,086 
(a)Electric Utilities and Infrastructure includes a $27 million reduction of a prior year impairment at Citrus County CC related to the plant's cost cap.
(a)EU&I includes $386 million recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $46 million within Regulated electric revenues and $34 million within Noncontrolling Interests related to the Duke Energy Indiana court rulings on coal ash on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 4 for additional information.
(b)Gas Utilities and Infrastructure includes an after-tax impairment charge of $19 million for the remaining investment in Constitution. See Note 13 for additional information.
(c)Includes the allocation of losses to noncontrolling tax equity members. See Note 1 for additional information.
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Electric
 Gas
   Total
      
 Utilities and
 Utilities and
 Commercial
 Reportable
      
(in millions)Infrastructure
 Infrastructure
 Renewables
 Segments
 Other
 Eliminations
 Total
Unaffiliated Revenues$22,242

$1,783

$477
 $24,502
 $19
 $
 $24,521
Intersegment Revenues31

98


 129
 70
 (199) 
Total Revenues$22,273
 $1,881
 $477
 $24,631
 $89
 $(199) $24,521
Interest Expense$1,288

$106

$88
 $1,482
 $657
 $(45) $2,094
Depreciation and amortization3,523

245

155
 3,923
 152
 (1) 4,074
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates5

27

(1) 31
 52
 
 83
Income tax expense (benefit)(a)
799
 78
 (147) 730
 (282) 
 448
Segment income (loss)(b)(c)(d)(e)
3,058
 274
 9
 3,341
 (694) 
 2,647
Add back noncontrolling interest component  
   
   
   
   
   
 (22)
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  
   
   
   
   
   
 19
Net income  
   
   
   
   
   
 $2,644
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions$8,086
 $1,133
 $193
 $9,412
 $256
 $
 $9,668
Segment assets125,364
 12,361
 4,204
 141,929
 3,275
 188
 145,392

(a)All segments include adjustments to the December 31, 2017, estimate of the income tax effects of the Tax Act. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure includes a $24 million expense, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure includes a $1 million expense, Commercial Renewables includes a $3 million benefit and Other includes a $2 million benefit. See Note 24 for additional information.
(b)Electric Utilities and Infrastructure includes after-tax regulatory and legislative impairment charges of $202 million related to rate case orders, settlements or other actions of regulators or legislative bodies and an after-tax impairment charge of $46 million related to the Citrus County CC at Duke Energy Florida. See Note 4 for additional information.
(c)Gas Utilities and Infrastructure includes an after-tax impairment charge of $42 million for the investment in Constitution. See Note 13 for additional information.

(b)    Other includes $72 million recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $71 million within Operations, maintenance and other and a $7 million gain within Gains on sales of other assets related to costs attributable to business transformation, including long-term real estate strategy changes and workforce realignment on the Consolidated Statements of Operations; it also includes $25 million recorded within Operations, maintenance and other related to litigation on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(c)    Other includes capital investments expenditures and acquisitions related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
(d)    Other includes Assets Held for Sale balances related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Refer to Note 2 for further information.
130
131




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS

Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Unaffiliated Revenues$22,570 $2,022 $24,592 $29 $— $24,621 
Intersegment Revenues33 90 123 84 (207)— 
Total Revenues$22,603 $2,112 $24,715 $113 $(207)$24,621 
Interest Expense$1,432 $142 $1,574 $643 $(10)$2,207 
Depreciation and amortization4,251 303 4,554 236 (28)4,762 
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates15 47 — 62 
Income tax expense (benefit)494 55 549 (281)— 268 
Segment income (loss)(a)(b)(c)
3,850 396 4,246 (641)(3)3,602 
Less noncontrolling interest329 
Add back preferred stock dividend106 
Discontinued operations200 
Net income$3,579 
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions(d)
$7,653 $1,271 $8,924 $828 $— $9,752 
Segment assets(e)
143,841 15,179 159,020 10,567 — 169,587 

(d)Commercial Renewables includes an impairment charge of $91 million, net of $2 million Noncontrolling interests, related to goodwill. See Note 12 for additional information.
(e)Other includes $65 million of after-tax costs to achieve the Piedmont merger, $144 million of after-tax severance charges related to a companywide initiative and an $82 million after-tax loss(a)    EU&I includes $160 million of expense recorded within Impairment of assets and other charges, $77 million of income within Other Income and expenses, $5 million of expense within Operations, maintenance and other, $13 million of income within regulated operating revenues, $3 million of expense within interest expense and $6 million of expense within Depreciation and amortization on the sale of Beckjord described below. For additional information, see Note 2 for the Piedmont Merger and Note 21 for severance charges.
In February 2018, Duke Energy sold Beckjord, a nonregulated facility retired during 2014,Carolinas' Consolidated Statement of Operations related to the South Carolina Supreme Court decision on coal ash and insurance proceeds; it also includes $42 million of expense recorded a pretax losswithin Impairment of $106assets and other charges, $34 million of income within Other Income and expenses, $7 million of expense within Operations, maintenance, and other, $15 million of income within Regulated electric operating revenues, $5 million of expense wit(Losses) Gains on Sales of Other Assets and Other, nethin interest expense and $1 million of expense within Operation, maintenanceDepreciation and otheramortization on the Duke Energy'sEnergy Progress' Consolidated Statement of Operations. See Notes 4 and 5 for more information.
(b)    GU&I includes $20 million, recorded within Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, related to natural gas pipeline investments. See Note 4 for the year ended December 31, 2018. The sale included the transferadditional information.
(c)    Other includes $133 million recorded within Impairment of coal ash basinsassets and other real propertycharges, $42 million within Operations, maintenance and indemnification from anyother, and all potential future claims$17 million within Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, related to the property, whether arising under environmental laws or otherwise.workplace and workforce realignment. See Note 11 for additional information.
(d)    Other includes capital investments expenditures and acquisitions related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Electric
 Gas
   Total
      
 Utilities and
 Utilities and
 Commercial
 Reportable
      
(in millions)Infrastructure
 Infrastructure
 Renewables
 Segments
 Other
 Eliminations
 Total
Unaffiliated Revenues$21,300
 $1,743
 $460
 $23,503
 $62
 $
 $23,565
Intersegment Revenues31
 93
 
 124
 76
 (200) 
Total Revenues$21,331
 $1,836
 $460
 $23,627
 $138
 $(200) $23,565
Interest Expense$1,240
 $105
 $87
 $1,432
 $574
 $(20) $1,986
Depreciation and amortization3,010
 231
 155
 3,396
 131
 
 3,527
Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates5
 62
 (5) 62
 57
 
 119
Income tax expense (benefit)(a)
1,355
 116
 (628) 843
 353
 
 1,196
Segment income (loss)(b)(c)(d)
3,210
 319
 441
 3,970
 (905) 
 3,065
Add back noncontrolling interest component  
   
   
   
   
   
 5
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax  
   
   
   
   
   
 (6)
Net income  
   
   
   
   
   
 $3,064
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions$7,024
 $907
 $92
 $8,023
 $175
 $
 $8,198
Segment assets119,423
 11,462
 4,156
 135,041
 2,685
 188
 137,914

(e)    Other includes Assets Held for Sale balances related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Refer to Note
2 for further information.
Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Unaffiliated Revenues$21,687 $1,653 $23,340 $26 $— $23,366 
Intersegment Revenues33 95 128 73 (201)— 
Total Revenues$21,720 $1,748 $23,468 $99 $(201)$23,366 
Interest Expense$1,320 $135 $1,455 $657 $(15)$2,097 
Depreciation and amortization4,068 258 4,326 207 (29)4,504 
Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates(1)(2,017)(2,018)13 — (2,005)
Income tax expense (benefit)340 (349)(9)(160)— (169)
Segment income (loss)(a)(b)(c)
2,669 (1,266)1,403 (418)(4)981 
Less noncontrolling interest295 
Add back preferred stock dividend107 
Discontinued operations289 
Net income$1,082 
Capital investments expenditures and acquisitions(d)
$7,629 $1,309 $8,938 $1,483 $— $10,421 
Segment assets(e)
138,225 13,849 152,074 10,314 — 162,388 
132

(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSAll segments include impacts of the Tax Act. Electric Utilities and Infrastructure includes a $231 million benefit, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure includes a $26 million benefit, Commercial Renewables includes a $442 million benefit and Other includes charges of $597 million.BUSINESS SEGMENTS
(b)Electric Utilities and Infrastructure includes after-tax regulatory settlement charges of $98 million.
(c)Commercial Renewables includes after-tax impairment charges of $74 million related to certain wind projects and the Energy Management Solutions reporting unit. See Notes 11 and 12 for additional information.
(d)Other includes $64 million of after-tax costs to achieve the Piedmont merger. See Note 2 for additional information.
(a)    EU&I includes $948 million of Impairment of assets and other charges and a reversal of $152 million included in Regulated electric operating revenue related to the CCR Settlement Agreement filed with the NCUC. Additionally, EU&I includes $19 million of Impairment of assets and other charges related to the Clemson University Combined Heat and Power Plant, $5 million of Impairment charges related to the natural gas pipeline assets and $16 million of shareholder contributions within Operations, maintenance and other related to Duke Energy Carolinas' and Duke Energy Progress' 2019 North Carolina rate cases. See Note 4 for additional information.
(b)    GU&I includes $2.1 billion recorded within Equity in (losses) earnings of unconsolidated affiliates and $7 million of Impairment of assets and other charges related to natural gas pipeline investments. See Notes 4 and 13 for additional information.
(c)    Other includes a $98 million reversal of 2018 severance costs due to a partial settlement in the Duke Energy Carolinas' 2019 North Carolina rate case. See Note 21 for additional information.
(d)    Other includes capital investments expenditures and acquisitions related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
(e)    Other includes Assets Held for Sale balances related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Refer to Note 2 for further information.
Geographical Information
Substantially all assets and revenues from continuing operations are within the U.S.
Major Customers
For the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, revenues from one customer of Duke Energy Progress are $635$684 million. Duke Energy Progress has 1one reportable segment, Electric Utilities and Infrastructure. No other Subsidiary Registrant has an individual customer representing more than 10% of its revenues.

131




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS


revenues for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Products and Services
The following table summarizes revenues of the reportable segments by type.
 Retail
 Wholesale
 Retail
   Total
(in millions)Electric
 Electric
 Natural Gas
 Other
 Revenues
2019        
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$19,745
 $2,231
 $
 $855
 $22,831
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
 
 1,782
 84
 1,866
Commercial Renewables
 389
 
 98
 487
Total Reportable Segments$19,745
 $2,620
 $1,782

$1,037
 $25,184
2018        
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$19,013
 $2,345
 $
 $915
 $22,273
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
 
 1,817
 64
 1,881
Commercial Renewables
 375
 
 102
 477
Total Reportable Segments$19,013
 $2,720
 $1,817

$1,081
 $24,631
2017        
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$18,177
 $2,104
 $
 $1,050
 $21,331
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
 
 1,732
 104
 1,836
Commercial Renewables
 375
 
 85
 460
Total Reportable Segments$18,177
 $2,479
 $1,732

$1,239
 $23,627

RetailWholesaleRetailTotal
(in millions)ElectricElectricNatural GasOtherRevenues
2022
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$22,036 $2,882 $ $1,106 $26,024 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure  2,535 305 2,840 
Total Reportable Segments$22,036 $2,882 $2,535 $1,411 $28,864 
2021
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$19,410 $2,216 $— $977 $22,603 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure— — 2,025 87 2,112 
Total Reportable Segments$19,410 $2,216 $2,025 $1,064 $24,715 
2020
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$18,898 $1,878 $— $944 $21,720 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure— — 1,691 57 1,748 
Total Reportable Segments$18,898 $1,878 $1,691 $1,001 $23,468 
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio has 2two reportable segments, Electric UtilitiesEU&I and Infrastructure and Gas Utilities and Infrastructure.GU&I.
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I transmits and distributes electricity in portions of Ohio and generates, distributes and sells electricity in portions of Northern Kentucky. Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I transports and sells natural gas in portions of Ohio and Northern Kentucky. Both reportable segments conduct operations primarily through Duke Energy Ohio and its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky.
The remainder of Duke Energy Ohio's operations is presented as Other. In December 2018, the PUCO approved an order which allows the recovery or credit of revenues and expenses related to Duke Energy Ohio's contractual arrangement to buy power from OVEC power plants. Due to the change in regulatory treatment of these amounts, OVEC revenues and expenses are now reflected in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment. Previously, OVEC revenues and expense were included in Other. These amounts are deemed immaterial for Duke Energy Ohio. Therefore, no prior period amounts were restated. See Note 4 for additional information on the PUCO order.
All Duke Energy Ohio assets and revenues from continuing operations are within the U.S.
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
 Electric
 Gas
 Total
      
 Utilities and
 Utilities and
 Reportable
      
(in millions)  
Infrastructure
 Infrastructure
 Segments
 Other
 Eliminations
 Total
Total revenues$1,456
 $484
 $1,940
 $
 $
 $1,940
Interest expense  $80
 $29
 $109
 $
 $
 $109
Depreciation and amortization  182
 83
 265
 
 
 265
Income tax expense (benefit)  20
 21
 41
 (1) 
 40
Segment income (loss)/Net income159
 85
 244
 (5) 
 239
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax          (1)
Net income          $238
Capital expenditures  $680
 $272
 $952
 $
 $
 $952
Segment assets  6,188
 3,116
 9,304
 34
 
 9,338

Year Ended December 31, 2022
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,798 $716 $2,514 $ $ $2,514 
Interest expense$86 $43 $129 $ $ $129 
Depreciation and amortization221 103 324   324 
Income tax expense (benefit)24 (43)(19)(2) (21)
Segment income (loss)/Net income189 121 310 (8) 302 
Capital expenditures$488 $362 $850 $ $ $850 
Segment assets7,504 4,164 11,668 14 (176)11,506 
132
133




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS

Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,493 $544 $2,037 $— $— $2,037 
Interest expense$87 $24 $111 $— $— $111 
Depreciation and amortization217 90 307 — — 307 
Income tax expense (benefit)15 19 34 (4)— 30 
Segment income (loss)/Net Income141 78 219 (15)— 204 
Capital expenditures$486 $362 $848 $— $— $848 
Segment assets6,882 3,892 10,774 29 (29)10,774 

Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,405 $453 $1,858 $— $— $1,858 
Interest expense$85 $17 $102 $— $— $102 
Depreciation and amortization200 78 278 — — 278 
Income tax expense (benefit)19 26 45 (2)— 43 
Segment income (loss)162 96 258 (6)— 252 
Capital expenditures$548 $286 $834 $— $— $834 
Segment assets6,615 3,380 9,995 32 (2)10,025 
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
 Electric
 Gas
 Total
      
 Utilities and
 Utilities and
 Reportable
      
(in millions)  Infrastructure
 Infrastructure
 Segments
 Other
 Eliminations
 Total
Total revenues$1,450
 $506
 $1,956
 $1
 $
 $1,957
Interest expense  $67
 $24
 $91
 $1
 $
 $92
Depreciation and amortization  183
 85
 268
 
 
 268
Income tax expense (benefit)  47
 24
 71
 (28) 
 43
Segment income (loss)/Net income(a)
186
 93
 279
 (103) 
 176
Capital expenditures  $655
 $172
 $827
 $
 $
 $827
Segment assets  5,643
 2,874
 8,517
 38
 
 8,555
(a)    Other includes the loss on the sale of Beckjord, see discussion above.
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
 Electric
 Gas
 Total
      
 Utilities and
 Utilities and
 Reportable
      
(in millions)  Infrastructure
 Infrastructure
 Segments
 Other
 Eliminations
 Total
Total revenues$1,373
 $508
 $1,881
 $42
 $
 $1,923
Interest expense  $62
 $28
 $90
 $1
 $
 $91
Depreciation and amortization  178
 83
 261
 
 
 261
Income tax expense (benefit)  40
 39
 79
 (20) 
 59
Segment income (loss)138
 85
 223
 (30) 
 193
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax          (1)
Net income

 

 

 

   $192
Capital expenditures  $491
 $195
 $686
 $
 $
 $686
Segment assets5,066
 2,758
 7,824
 66
 (15) 7,875


133




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


4. REGULATORY MATTERS
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants record regulatory assets and liabilities that result from the ratemaking process. See Note 1 for further information.
134

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy and Progress Energy. See separate tables below for balances by individual registrant.
 Duke Energy Progress Energy
 December 31, December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2019
 2018
Regulatory Assets       
AROs – coal ash$4,084
 $4,255
 $1,843
 $2,061
AROs – nuclear and other739
 772
 668
 601
Accrued pension and OPEB2,391
 2,654
 897
 1,074
Storm cost deferrals1,399
 1,117
 1,214
 953
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net1,042
 1,093
 1,042
 1,093
Debt fair value adjustment1,019
 1,099
 
 
Deferred fuel and purchased power528
 838
 305
 600
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA388
 426
 38
 43
Hedge costs deferrals356
 204
 129
 74
Demand side management (DSM)/Energy Efficiency (EE)343
 449
 241
 256
Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI)338
 367
 114
 127
Retired generation facilities331
 402
 266
 324
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses329
 320
 33
 36
Vacation accrual214
 213
 41
 41
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts117
 141
 
 
Nuclear deferral107
 133
 40
 46
Manufactured gas plant (MGP)102
 99
 
 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs79
 65
 
 
NCEMPA deferrals72
 50
 72
 50
East Bend deferrals44
 47
 
 
Transmission expansion obligation36
 39
 
 
Amounts due from customers36
 24
 
 
Grid modernization28
 31
 
 
Other896
 784
 349
 322
Total regulatory assets15,018
 15,622

7,292

7,701
Less: current portion1,796
 2,005
 946
 1,137
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$13,222
 $13,617

$6,346

$6,564
Regulatory Liabilities       
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$7,872
 $8,058
 $2,595
 $2,710
Costs of removal5,756
 5,421
 2,561
 2,135
AROs – nuclear and other1,100
 538
 
 
Accrued pension and OPEB176
 301
 
 149
Amounts to be refunded to customers34
 34
 
 
Deferred fuel and purchased power1
 16
 1
 16
Other1,109
 1,064
 398
 319
Total regulatory liabilities16,048
 15,432
 5,555
 5,329
Less: current portion784
 598
 330
 280
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$15,264
 $14,834
 $5,225
 $5,049

Duke EnergyProgress Energy
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Regulatory Assets
AROs – coal ash$3,205 $3,408 $1,429 $1,399 
AROs – nuclear and other945 684 884 620 
Deferred fuel and purchased power3,866 1,253 2,060 718 
Accrued pension and OPEB2,336 2,017 759 725 
Storm cost securitized balance, net940 991 720 759 
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 881 937 
Debt fair value adjustment829 884  — 
Storm cost deferrals666 213 559 189 
Hedge costs deferrals378 348 128 137 
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses342 356 42 47 
Retired generation facilities316 357 243 265 
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA288 317 21 21 
Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI)283 311 111 130 
Customer connect project271 242 136 124 
Costs of removal regulatory asset221 107 221 107 
Vacation accrual222 221 43 42 
Incremental COVID-19 expenses210 87 78 28 
CEP deferral190 161  — 
Demand side management (DSM)/Energy efficiency (EE)189 235 188 230 
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts168 139  — 
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 157 165 
Nuclear deferral154 120 64 42 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs121 108  — 
COR settlement120 123 32 32 
Deferred coal ash handling system costs92 90 25 23 
Qualifying facility contract buyouts81 94 81 94 
Amounts due from customers57 85  — 
Propane caverns26 —  — 
Deferred severance charges21 54 7 18 
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104  — 
Other555 426 110 87 
Total regulatory assets18,130 14,637 8,979 6,939 
Less: current portion3,485 2,150 1,833 1,030 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$14,645 $12,487 $7,146 $5,909 
Regulatory Liabilities
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$6,462 $7,199 $2,192 $2,394 
Costs of removal5,151 6,150 2,269 2,955 
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053  — 
Hedge cost deferrals683 364 252 155 
Accrued pension and OPEB211 213  — 
DOE Settlement154 — 154 — 
Provision for rate refunds78 274 28 87 
Amounts to be refunded to customers45 —  — 
Other1,226 1,110 434 453 
Total regulatory liabilities15,048 17,363 5,329 6,044 
Less: current portion1,466 1,211 576 478 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$13,582 $16,152 $4,753 $5,566 
Descriptions of regulatory assets and liabilities summarized in the tables above and below follow. See tables below for recovery and amortization periods at the separate registrants.

134




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


AROs coal ash. Represents deferred depreciation and accretion related to the legal obligation to close ash basins. The costs are deferred until recovery treatment has been determined. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
135

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
AROs nuclear and other. Represents regulatory assets or liabilities, including deferred depreciation and accretion, related to legal obligations associated with the future retirement of property, plant and equipment, excluding amounts related to coal ash. The AROs relate primarily to decommissioning nuclear power facilities. The amounts also include certain deferred gains and losses on NDTF investments. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
Deferred fuel and purchased power. Represents certain energy-related costs that are recoverable or refundable as approved by the applicable regulatory body.
Accrued pension and OPEB. Accrued pension and OPEB represent regulatory assets and liabilities related to each of the Duke Energy Registrants’ respective shares of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service cost and credit attributable to Duke Energy’s pension plans and OPEB plans. The regulatory asset or liability is amortized with the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost and credit to net periodic benefit costs for pension and OPEB plans. The accrued pension and OPEB regulatory assets are expected to be recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Storm cost deferrals.securitized balance, net. Represents deferred incremental costs incurredthe North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to major weather-related events.Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego (2018 and 2019 events).
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net. Represents the balance associated with Crystal River Unit 3 retirement approved for recovery by the FPSC on September 15, 2015, and the upfront financing costs securitized in 2016 with issuance of the associated bonds. The regulatory asset balance is net of the AFUDC equity portion.
Debt fair value adjustment. Purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of Progress Energy and Piedmont at fair value in connection with the 2012 and 2016 mergers, respectively. Amount is amortized over the life of the related debt.
Deferred fuel and purchased power. Represents certain energy-related costs that are recoverable or refundable as approved by the applicable regulatory body.
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA.Storm cost deferrals. Represents deferred incremental costs incurred for the canceled Lee and Harris nuclear projects.related to major weather-related events.
Hedge costs and other deferrals. Amounts relate to unrealized gains and losses on derivatives recorded as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively, until the contracts are settled.
DSM/EE.Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses. Represents deferred depreciation and operating expenses as well as carrying costs on the portion of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.
Retired generation facilities. Represents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA. Represents deferred costs related to various DSMincurred for the canceled Lee and EE programs recoverable through various mechanisms.Harris nuclear projects.
AMI. Represents deferred costs related to the installation of AMI meters and remaining net book value of non-AMI meters to be replaced at Duke Energy Carolinas, net book value of existing meters at Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Ohio and expected future recovery of net book value of electromechanical meters that have been replaced with AMI meters at Duke Energy Indiana.
Retired generation facilities.Customer connect project. Represents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses. Represents deferred depreciation andincremental operating expenses as well asand carrying costs on deferred amounts related to the portiondeployment of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.the new customer information system.
Vacation accrual. Represents vacation entitlement, which is generally recovered in the following year.
Incremental COVID-19 expenses. Representsincremental costs related to ensuring continuity and quality of service in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CEP deferral. Represents deferred depreciation, PISCC and deferred property tax for Duke Energy Ohio Gas capital assets for the Capital Expenditure Program (CEP).
DSM/EE. Deferred costs related to various DSM and EE programs recoverable through various mechanisms.
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts. Represents costs for certain long-dated, fixed quantity forward natural gas supply contracts, which are recoverable through PGA clauses.
NCEMPA deferrals. Represents retail allocated cost deferrals and returns associated with the additional ownership interest in assets acquired from NCEMPA in 2015.
Nuclear deferral. Includes amounts related to levelizing nuclear plant outage costs, which allows for the recognition of nuclear outage expenses over the refueling cycle rather than when the outage occurs, resulting in the deferral of operations and maintenance costs associated with refueling.
Deferred pipeline integrity costs. Represents pipeline integrity management costs in compliance with federal regulations.
COR settlement. Represents approved COR settlements that are being amortized over the average remaining lives, at the time of approval, of the associated assets.
Deferred coal ash handling system costs. Represents deferred depreciation and returns associated with capital assets related to converting the ash handling system from wet to dry.
Qualifying facility contract buyouts. Represents termination payments for regulatory recovery through the capacity clause.
Amounts due from customers. Relates primarily to margin decoupling and IMR recovery mechanisms.
136

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Costs of removal regulatory asset. Represents the excess of spend over funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired, net of certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
Propane Caverns. Represents amounts for costs related to propane inventory, the net book value of remaining assets and decommissioning costs at Duke Energy Ohio.
MGP. Represents remediation costs incurred at former MGP sites and the deferral of costs to be incurred at Duke Energy Ohio's East End and West End sites.
Deferred pipeline integrity costs. Represents pipeline integrity management costs in compliance with federal regulations recovered through a rider mechanism.
NCEMPA deferrals. Represents retail allocated cost deferrals and returns associated with the additional ownership interest in assets acquired from NCEMPA in 2015.
East Bend deferrals. Represents both deferred operating expenses and deferred depreciation as well as carrying costs on the portion of East Bend that was acquired from Dayton Power and Light and that had been previously operated as a jointly owned facility.
Transmission expansion obligation. Represents transmission expansion obligations related to Duke Energy Ohio’s withdrawal from MISO.
Amounts due from customers. Relates primarily to margin decoupling and IMR recovery mechanisms.
Grid modernization. Amounts represent deferred depreciation and operating expenses as well as carrying costs on the portion of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes. Amounts for all registrants include regulatory liabilities related primarily to impacts from the Tax Act. See Note 24 for additional information. Amounts have no immediate impact on rate base as regulatory assets are offset by deferred tax liabilities.

135




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Costs of removal. Represents funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired. Also includes certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
AmountsDOE Settlement. Represents litigation settlement funds received resulting from the DOE’s failure to be refundedaccept spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste from the Crystal River Unit 3 during 2014-2018 as required under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
Provision for rate refunds. Represents estimated amounts due to customers. Represents required rate reductionscustomers based on recording interim rates subject to retail customers by the applicable regulatory body.refund.
RESTRICTIONS ON THE ABILITY OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES TO MAKE DIVIDENDS, ADVANCES AND LOANS TO DUKE ENERGY
As a condition to the approval of merger transactions, the NCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, KPSC and IURC imposed conditions on the ability of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont to transfer funds to Duke Energy through loans or advances, as well as restricted amounts available to pay dividends to Duke Energy. Certain subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Parent by obtaining approval of the respective state regulatory commissions. These conditions imposed restrictions on the ability of the public utility subsidiaries to pay cash dividends as discussed below.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also have restrictions imposed by their first mortgage bond indentures, which in certain circumstances, limit their ability to make cash dividends or distributions on common stock. Amounts restricted as a result of these provisions were not material at December 31, 2019.2022.
Additionally, certain other subsidiaries of Duke Energy have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to Duke Energy due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, minimum working capital and tangible net worth requirements.
The restrictions discussed below were not a material amount of Duke Energy's and Progress Energy's net assets at December 31, 2019.2022.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Duke Energy Carolinas must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to mergers to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Progress
Duke Energy Progress must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the mergers between Duke Energy and Progress Energy and Duke Energy and Piedmont to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the respective mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without the prior authorization of the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio received FERC and PUCO approval to pay dividends from its equity accounts that are reflective of the amount that it would have in its retained earnings account had push-down accounting for the Cinergy merger not been applied to Duke Energy Ohio’s balance sheet. The conditions include a commitment from Duke Energy Ohio that equity, adjusted to remove the impacts of push-down accounting, will not fall below 30% of total capital.
Duke Energy Kentucky is required to pay dividends solely out of retained earnings and to maintain a minimum of 35% equity in its capital structure.
Duke Energy Indiana
Duke Energy Indiana must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the merger between Duke Energy and Cinergy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded. In addition, Duke Energy Indiana will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without prior authorization of the IURC.
Piedmont
Piedmont must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the acquisition of Piedmont by Duke Energy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
RATE-RELATED INFORMATION
The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, IURC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC approve rates for retail electric and natural gas services within their states. The FERC approves rates for electric sales to wholesale customers served under cost-based rates (excluding Ohio and Indiana), as well as sales of transmission service. The FERC also regulates certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects.

136137




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress
Hurricane Florence,Ian
In late September and early October 2022, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego Deferral Filings
On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed with the NCUC petitions for approvalIan inflicted severe damage to defer the incremental costs incurred in connection with the response to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael and Winter Storm Diego to a regulatory asset for recovery in the next base rate case. The NCUC issued an order requesting comments on the deferral positions. On March 5, 2019, the North Carolina Public Staff (Public Staff) filed comments. On April 2, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed reply comments, which included revised estimates of approximately $553 million in incremental operation and maintenance expenses ($171 million and $382 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively) and approximately $96 million in capital costs ($20 million and $76 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). On September 30, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas requested that the NCUC consolidate its pending deferral request with its general rate case filed on that date. On October 30, 2019, Duke Energy Progress requested that the NCUC consolidate its pending deferral request with its general rate case filed on that date. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these matters. Duke Energy Progress filed a deferral request for these storms with the PSCSC on January 11, 2019, which also included a request for the continuation of prior deferrals requested for ice storms and Hurricane Matthew, and on January 30, 2019, the PSCSC issued a directive approving the deferral request, followed by an order issued on February 21, 2019. On March 15, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a request with FERC requesting permission to defer transmission-related storm costs that would be charged to wholesale transmission customers through Duke Energy Progress' Open Access Transmission Tariff (OATT) and to recover those costs from wholesale transmission customers over a three-year recovery period. FERC accepted the filing on May 14, 2019, which allows Duke Energy Progress to proceed with the proposed cost deferral and recovery.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)2019
2018
 a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
     
AROs – coal ash$1,696
$1,725
 (i)(b)
Accrued pension and OPEB477
581
  (j)
Storm cost deferrals178
160
 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power222
196
 (f)2021
Deferred asset – Lee COLA350
383
  (b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
198
101
 Yes2041
DSM/EE100
169
 (h)(h)
AMI166
176
 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
16
21
 Yes2023
PISCC(c)
33
34
 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual80
78
 (e)2020
Nuclear deferral67
87
  2021
Other327
266
  (b)
Total regulatory assets3,910
3,977
   
Less: current portion550
520
   
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$3,360
$3,457
   
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
     
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(d)
$3,060
$3,082
  (b)
Costs of removal(c)
1,936
1,968
 Yes(g)
AROs – nuclear and other1,100
538
  (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB39
38
  (j)
Other543
572
  (b)
Total regulatory liabilities6,678
6,198
   
Less: current portion255
199
   
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$6,423
$5,999
   

137




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


(a)Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)Included in rate base.
(d)Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24.
(e)Earns a return on outstanding balance in North Carolina.
(f)Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(g)Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(h)Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(i)Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(j)Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
2017 North Carolina Rate Case
On August 25, 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas filed an application with the NCUC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $647 million, which represented an approximate 13.6% increase in annual base revenues. The request for rate increase was driven by capital investments subsequent to the previous base rate case, including the W.S. Lee CC, grid improvement projects, AMI, investments in customer service technologies, costs of complying with CCR regulations and the Coal Ash Act and recovery of costs related to licensing and development of the William States Lee III Nuclear Station.
On February 28, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and the Public Staff filed an Agreement and Stipulation of Partial Settlement resolving certain portions of the proceeding. Terms of the settlement included a return on equity of 9.9% and a capital structure of 52% equity and 48% debt. As a result of the settlement, Duke Energy Carolinas recorded a pretax charge of approximately $4 million in the first quarter of 2018 to Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
On June 22, 2018, the NCUC issued an order approving the Stipulation of Partial Settlement and requiring a revenue reduction.
As a result of the June 22, 2018, order, Duke Energy Carolinas recorded a pretax charge of approximately $150 million to Impairment charges and Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The charge was primarily related to the denial of a return on the Lee Nuclear Project and the assessment of a $70 million management penalty by reducing the annual recovery of deferred coal ash costs by $14 million per year over a five-year recovery period. On July 27, 2018, NCUC approved Duke Energy Carolinas' compliance filing. As a result, revised customer rates were effective on August 1, 2018.
On July 20, 2018, the North Carolina Attorney General filed a Notice of Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court from the June 22, 2018, Order Accepting Stipulation, Deciding Contested Issues and Requiring Revenue Reduction issued by the NCUC. The Attorney General contends the commission’s order should be reversed and remanded, as it is in excess of the commission’s statutory authority; affected by errors of law; unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted; and arbitrary or capricious. The Sierra Club, North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association, North Carolina Justice Center, North Carolina Housing Coalition, Natural Resource Defense Council and Southern Alliance for Clean Energy also filed Notices of Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court. On August 8, 2018, the Public Staff filed a Notice of Cross Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court, which contends the commission’s June 22, 2018, order should be reversed and remanded, as it is affected by errors of law, and is unsupported by substantial evidence with regard to the commission’s failure to consider substantial evidence of coal ash related environmental violations. On November 29, 2018, the North Carolina Attorney General's Office filed a motion with the North Carolina Supreme Court requesting the court consolidate the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress appeals and enter an order adopting the parties’ proposed briefing schedule as set outterritories in the filing. On November 29, 2018, the North Carolina Supreme Court adopted a schedule for briefing set forth in the motion to consolidate the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress appeals. Appellant briefs were filed on April 26, 2019. The Appellee response briefs were filed on September 25, 2019. Oral arguments before the North Carolina Supreme Court are scheduled for March 11, 2020. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2019 North Carolina Rate Case
On September 30, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed an application with the NCUC for a net rate increase for retail customers of approximately $291 million, which represents an approximate 6% increase in annual base revenues. The gross rate case revenue increase request is $445 million, which is offset by an EDIT rider of $154 million to return to customers North Carolina and federal EDIT resulting from recent reductions in corporate tax rates. The request for rate increase is driven by major capital investments subsequent to the previous base rate case, coal ash pond closure costs, accelerated coal plant depreciation and deferred 2018 storm costs. Duke Energy Carolinas requests rates be effective no later than August 1, 2020. The NCUC has established a procedural schedule with an evidentiary hearing to commence on March 23, 2020. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2018 South Carolina Rate Case
On November 8, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed an application with the PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $168 million, which represents an approximate 10% increase in retail revenues. The request for rate increase was driven by capital investments and environmental compliance progress made by Duke Energy Carolinas since its previous rate case, including the further implementation of Duke Energy Carolinas’ generation modernization program, which consists of retiring, replacing and upgrading generation plants, investments in customer service technologies and continued investments in base work to maintain its transmission and distribution systems. The request included net tax benefits resulting from the Tax Act of $66 million to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily from the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The request also included $46 million to return EDIT resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change and benefits of $17 million from a reduction in North Carolina state income taxes allocable to South Carolina (EDIT Rider).

138




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Duke Energy Carolinas also requested approval of its proposed Grid Improvement Plan (GIP), adjustments to its Prepaid Advantage Program and a variety of accounting orders related to ongoing costs for environmental compliance, including recovery over a five-year period of $242 million of deferred coal ash related compliance costs, grid investments between rate changes, incremental depreciation expense, a result of new depreciation rates from the depreciation study approved in the 2017 North Carolina Rate Case above, and the balance of development costs associated with the cancellation of the Lee Nuclear Project. Finally, Duke Energy Carolinas sought approval to establish a reserve and accrual for end-of-life nuclear costs for nuclear fuel and materials and supplies. On March 8, 2019, the ORS moved to establish a new and separate hearing docket to review and consider the GIP proposed by Duke Energy Carolinas. Subsequently, on March 12, 2019, the ORS and Duke Energy Carolinas executed a Stipulation resolving the ORS’s motion. The Stipulation provided that costs incurred for the GIP after January 1, 2019, would be deferred with a return, subject to evaluation in a future rate proceeding. The Stipulation was approved by the PSCSC on June 19, 2019. On December 16, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed a Joint Petition to Establish an Informational Docket for Review and Consideration of Grid Improvement Plans through which Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress would provide interested stakeholders information on the companies' grid activities. The PSCSC requested parties comment on procedural matters by January 31; accordingly, various groups filed comments, none of which opposed an informational docket. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
After hearings in March 2019, the PSCSC issued an order on May 21, 2019, which included a return on equity of 9.5% and a capital structure of 53% equity and 47% debt. The order also included the following material components:
Approval of cancellation of the Lee Nuclear Project, with Duke Energy Carolinas maintaining the Combined Operating License;
Approval of recovery of $125 million (South Carolina retail portion) of Lee Nuclear Project development costs (including AFUDC through December 2017) over a 12-year period, but denial of a return on the deferred balance of costs;
Approval of recovery of $96 million of coal ash costs over a five-year period with a return at Duke Energy Carolinas' WACC;
Denial of recovery of $115 million of certain coal ash costs deemed to be related to the Coal Ash Act and incremental to the federal CCR rule;
Approval of a $66 million decrease to base rates to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%;
Approval of a $45 million decrease through the EDIT Rider to return EDIT resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change, to be returned in accordance with the Average Rate Assumption Method (ARAM) for protected EDIT, over a 20-year period for unprotected EDIT associated with Property, Plant and Equipment, over a five-year period for unprotected EDIT not associated with Property, Plant and Equipment and over a five-year period for the deferred revenues; and
Approval of a $17 million decrease through the EDIT Rider related to reductions in the North Carolina state income tax rate from 6.9% to 2.5% to be returned over a five-year period.
As a result of the order, revised customer rates were effective June 1, 2019. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration of that order contending substantial rights of Duke Energy Carolinas were prejudiced by unlawful, arbitrary and capricious rulings by the commission on certain issues presented in the proceeding. On June 19, 2019, the PSCSC issued a Directive denying Duke Energy Carolinas' request to rehear or reconsider the commission's rulings on certain issues presented in the proceeding including coal ash remediation and disposal costs, return on equity and the recovery of a return on deferred operation and maintenance expenses. An order detailing the commission's decision in the Directive was issued on October 18, 2019. Duke Energy Carolinas filed a notice of appeal on November 15, 2019, with the South Carolina Supreme Court. On November 20, 2019, the South Carolina Energy Users Committee filed a Notice of Appeal and the ORS filed a Notice of Cross Appeal with the South Carolina Supreme Court. On January 8, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas and the ORS filed a joint motion to extend briefing schedule deadlines. Appellant briefs are due on March 2, 2020, and Appellee response briefs are due on May 15, 2020. On February 12, 2020, Duke Energy Carolinas and the ORS filed a joint motion to extend briefing deadlines by 30 days. Based on legal analysis and the filing of the appeal, Duke Energy Carolinas has not recorded an adjustment for its deferred coal ash costs. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
FERC Formula Rate Matter
On July 31, 2017, PMPA filed a complaint with FERC alleging that Duke Energy Carolinas misapplied the formula rate under the PPA between the parties by including in its rates amortization expense associated with regulatory assets and recorded in a certain account without FERC approval. On February 15, 2018, FERC issued an order ruling in favor of PMPA and ordered Duke Energy Carolinas to refund to PMPA all amounts improperly collected under the PPA. Duke Energy Carolinas has issued to PMPA and similarly situated wholesale customers refunds of approximately $25 million. FERC also set the matter for settlement and hearing. PMPA and other customers filed a protest to Duke Energy Carolinas' refund report claiming that the refunds are inadequate in that (1) Duke Energy Carolinas invoked the limitations periods in the contracts to limit the time period for which the refunds were paid and the customers disagree that this limitation applies, and (2) Duke Energy Carolinas refunded only amounts recovered through a certain account and the customers have asserted that the order applies to all regulatory assets. On July 3, 2018, FERC issued an order accepting Duke Energy Carolinas' refund report and ruling that these two claims are outside the scope of FERC's February order. The settlement agreements and revised formula rates for all parties to the proceeding were filed on December 28, 2018. On April 2, 2019, FERC issued an order approving the settlement agreement as filed. Since then, Duke Energy Carolinas has implemented the terms of the settlement in rates with all wholesale customers, including non-intervening customers. On July 25, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas received FERC approval for the accounting treatment requested for certain assets included in the settlement agreements. This is the final approval needed from FERC and concludes this proceeding.

139




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Sale of Hydroelectric (Hydro) Plants
In May 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas entered an agreement for the sale of 5 hydro plants with a combined 18.7-MW generation capacity in the Western Carolinas region to Northbrook Energy. The completion of the transaction was subject to approval from FERC for the 4 FERC-licensed plants, as well as other state regulatory agencies and was contingent upon regulatory approval from the NCUC and PSCSC to defer the total estimated loss on the sale of approximately $40 million. On July 5, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed with the NCUC for approval of the sale of the 5 hydro plants to Northbrook, to transfer the CPCNs for the 4 North Carolina hydro plants and to establish a regulatory asset for the North Carolina retail portion of the difference between sales proceeds and net book value. On June 5, 2019, the NCUC issued an order approving the transfer of the hydro plants from Duke Energy Carolinas to Northbrook, granting deferral accounting and denying the Public Staff's motion for reconsideration.
On August 28, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed with PSCSC an Application for Approval of Transfer and Sale of Hydroelectric Generation Facilities, Acceptance for Filing of a Power Purchase Agreement and an Accounting Order to Establish a Regulatory Asset. On September 10, 2018, the ORS provided a letter to the commission stating its position on the application and on September 18, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas requested this matter be carried over to allow Duke Energy Carolinas time to discuss certain accounting issues with the ORS. At its June 26, 2019, agenda meeting, the PSCSC voted to approve the transfer and sale subject to the recommendation of the ORS that the issuance of an Accounting Order will not preclude the ORS, the commission or any other party from addressing the reasonableness of these costs, any return sought and including any carrying costs in the next rate case.
On August 9, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas and Northbrook filed a joint Application for Transfer of Licenses with the FERC. On December 27, 2018, the FERC issued its Order Approving Transfer of Licenses for the 4 FERC-licensed hydro plants. On January 18, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Northbrook Carolina Hydro II, LLC requested a six-month extension of time to comply with the requirement of the December 27, 2018, order that Northbrook submit to FERC certified copies of all instruments of conveyance and signed acceptance sheets within 60 days of the date of the order. On February 14, 2019, FERC issued an order granting extensions until August 26, 2019, to comply with the requirements of the December 27, 2018, order.
The closing occurred on August 16, 2019. A regulatory asset was established for approximately $32 million, which represents the total deferral amount for North Carolina and South Carolina retail. The North Carolina retail portion will be amortized pursuant to an order from the NCUC. Duke Energy Carolinas will purchase all the capacity and energy generated by these facilities at the avoided cost for five years through power purchase agreements.

140




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Duke Energy Progress
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)2019
2018
 a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
     
AROs – coal ash$1,834
$2,051
 (h)(b)
AROs – nuclear and other509
429
  (c)
Accrued pension and OPEB423
542
  (k)
Storm cost deferrals(d)
801
571
 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power266
397
 (f)2021
Deferred asset – Harris COLA38
43
   
Hedge costs deferrals85
54
  (b)
DSM/EE(e)
216
235
 (i)(i)
AMI61
67
  (b)
Retired generation facilities83
105
 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses33
36
 Yes2054
Vacation accrual41
41
  2020
Nuclear deferral40
46
  2021
NCEMPA deferrals72
50
 (g)2042
Other176
147
  (b)
Total regulatory assets4,678
4,814
   
Less: current portion526
703
   
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,152
$4,111
   
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
     
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(l)
$1,802
$1,863
  (b)
Costs of removal2,294
1,878
 Yes(j)
Accrued pension and OPEB
93
  (k)
Other372
299
  (b)
Total regulatory liabilities4,468
4,133
   
Less: current portion236
178
   
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$4,232
$3,955
   
(a)Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)Recovery period for costs related to nuclear facilities runs through the decommissioning period of each unit.
(d)South Carolina storm costs are included in rate base.
(e)Included in rate base.
(f)Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(g)South Carolina retail allocated costs are earning a return.
(h)Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(i)Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(j)Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(k)Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(l)Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 23.
2017 North Carolina Rate Case
On June 1, 2017, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the NCUC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $477 million, which represented an approximate 14.9% increase in annual base revenues. Subsequent to the filing, Duke Energy Progress adjusted the requested amount to $420 million, representing an approximate 13% increase. The request for rate increase was driven by capital investments subsequent to the previous base rate case, costs of complying with CCR regulations and the Coal Ash Act, costs relating to storm recovery, investments in customer service technologies and recovery of costs associated with renewable purchased power.

141




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


On November 22, 2017, Duke Energy Progress and the Public Staff filed an Agreement and Stipulation of Partial Settlement resolving certain portions of the proceeding. Terms of the settlement included a return on equity of 9.9% and a capital structure of 52% equity and 48% debt. On February 23, 2018, the NCUC issued an order approving the stipulation.
The order also impacted certain amounts that were similarly recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets. As a result of the order, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas recorded pretax charges of $68 million and $14 million, respectively, in the first quarter of 2018 to Impairment charges, Operation, maintenance and other and Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Revised customer rates became effective on March 16, 2018.
On May 15, 2018, the Public Staff filed a Notice of Cross Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court from the NCUC's February 23, 2018, order. The Public Staff contends the NCUC’s order should be reversed and remanded, as it is affected by errors of law, and is unsupported by competent, material and substantial evidence in view of the entire record as submitted. The North Carolina Attorney General and Sierra Club also filed Notices of Appeal to the North Carolina Supreme Court from the February 23, 2018, order. On November 29, 2018, the North Carolina Attorney General's Office filed a motion with the North Carolina Supreme Court requesting the court consolidate the Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas appeals and enter an order adopting the parties’ proposed briefing schedule as set out in the filing. Appellant briefs were filed on April 26, 2019. The Appellee response briefs were filed on September 25, 2019. Oral arguments before the North Carolina Supreme Court are scheduled for March 11, 2020. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2019 North Carolina Rate Case
On October 30, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the NCUC for a net rate increase for retail customers of approximately $464 million, which represents an approximate 12.3% increase in annual base revenues. The gross rate case revenue increase request is $586 million, which is offset by riders of $122 million, primarily an EDIT rider of $120 million to return to customers North Carolina and federal EDIT resulting from recent reductions in corporate tax rates. The request for rate increase is driven by major capital investments subsequent to the previous base rate case, coal ash pond closure costs, accelerated coal plant depreciation and deferred 2018 storm costs. Duke Energy Progress seeks to defer and recover incremental Hurricane Dorian storm costs in this proceeding and requests rates be effective no later than September 1, 2020. The NCUC has established a procedural schedule with an evidentiary hearing to commence on May 4, 2020. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Hurricane Dorian
Hurricane Dorian reached the Carolinas in September 2019 as a Category 2 hurricane making landfall within Duke Energy Progress’ service territory. Approximately 270,000 North Carolina customers and 30,000 South Carolina950,000 customers were impacted by the slow-moving storm that brought high winds, tornadoes and heavy rain. With storm-response mobilization occurring in preparation for the storm and the assistance of mutual aid partners, full restoration was accomplished within four days for all customers able to receive service.impacted. Total estimated incremental operation and maintenance expenses incurred to repair and restorefor restoration efforts for the system areyear ended December 31, 2022, were approximately $205$100 million, with an additional $4$9 million in capital investments made for restoration efforts.investments. Approximately $179$83 million of the operation and maintenance expenses are deferred in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019. 2022 ($40 million and $43 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have regulatory tools to recover storm costs including deferral and securitization. These estimates could change as Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress receive additional information on actual costs.
Carbon Plan Proceeding
On October 13, 2021, North Carolina enacted legislation (Energy Solutions for North Carolina or HB 951) that established a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance North Carolina CO2 emission reductions from electric generating facilities in the state through the use of least cost planning while providing for continued reliability and affordable rates for customers. Among other things, HB 951 directed that the NCUC approve an initial carbon plan (Carbon Plan) by December 31, 2022, taking all reasonable steps to achieve a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from public utilities’ electric generating facilities in the state by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and achieve carbon neutrality from electric generating facilities by 2050 while maintaining affordability and reliability for customers. On May 16, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed their proposed Carolinas Carbon Plan (Proposed Plan) with the NCUC.
The balanceNCUC issued an order on December 30, 2022, adopting the first Carbon Plan. The order recognizes the value of operationan “all-of-the-above” approach to achieving CO2 emission reductions and maintenance expensesestablished a set of near-term procurement and development activities needed to continue progress towards the targeted CO2 reductions, along with the schedule for the future biennial updates to the Carbon Plan. The approved near-term action plan includes procurement and development of solar, storage and hydrogen-capable natural gas generation at levels consistent with the Proposed Plan, along with upgrading key transmission facilities to strengthen the grid, improve resilience for customers and interconnect new solar generation and stakeholder engagement activities for onshore wind generation (in all cases, subject to any further applicable regulatory processes). The order also approved early development activities for long lead-time resources, including new nuclear, pumped-hydro storage and offshore wind transmission development. The NCUC affirmed the utility ownership structure required in HB 951; all new generation facilities or other resources selected by the NCUC to achieve the CO2 emission reductions shall be owned and recovered on a cost-of-service basis by the utilities, with a carveout for 45% of solar and solar plus storage generation to be procured through long-term purchase power agreements with third parties. The order approves continued utilization of the remaining coal-fired generation assets, ensuring that appropriate replacement generating units and associated transmission infrastructure are included in Operation, maintenanceservice before existing generating units are retired and otherproviding an orderly transition out of coal generation by 2035.
Storm Cost Securitization Legislation
On June 15, 2022, the South Carolina General Assembly unanimously adopted S. 1077 (Act 227) in both the House and Senate and the bill was signed into law on June 17, 2022. The legislation enables the PSCSC to permit the issuance of bonds for the payment of storm costs and the creation of a storm charge for repayment.
On August 5, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a petition with the PSCSC for review and approval of deferred storm costs to be securitized of approximately $223 million. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on or after March 1, 2023. On February 7, 2023, a stipulation was reached with all parties in the proceeding regarding certain items identified through the Office of Regulatory Staff (ORS) audit of storm costs. The final amount for securitization will depend on the Consolidated Statementsoutcome of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2019. A request for an accounting order to defer incremental storm costs associated with Hurricane Dorian was included in Duke Energy Progress' October 30, 2019, general rate case filing with the NCUC. hearing.Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2018
138

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$1,391 $1,227 (g)(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(i)
1,614 339 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
614 365 Yes(h)
Storm cost securitized balance, net220 232 2041
Storm cost deferrals
93 22 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
228 171 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
30 31 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
39 54 Yes(b)
Deferred asset – Lee COLA267 296 (b)
AMI139 140 Yes(b)
Customer connect project62 66 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual84 83 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses127 51 Yes(b)
Nuclear deferral90 78 2024
COR settlement88 91 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs67 67 Yes(b)
Other235 166 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,388 3,479 
Less: current portion1,095 544 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,293 $2,935 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(d)
$2,475 $2,785 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
1,769 2,009 Yes(f)
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053 (b)
Hedge cost deferrals
350 209 (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
44 44 Yes(h)
Provision for rate refunds50 124 Yes(b)
Other587 461 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities6,313 7,685 
Less: current portion530 487 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$5,783 $7,198 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)     Included in rate base.
(d)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(i)    Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in May 2022 for recovery of $327 million, which included deferrals through January 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through August 2023. The next filing will be made in the first quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in July 2022 for recovery of $79 million, which included deferrals through May 2022. The amount is expected to be recovered through September 2023. The next filing will be made in the third quarter of 2023.
2023 North Carolina Rate Case
On January 19, 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The PBR Application includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $501 million in Year 1, $172 million in Year 2 and $150 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $823 million or 15.7% by early 2026. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Carolinas plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on September 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by January 1, 2024. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
139

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Oconee Nuclear Station Subsequent License Renewal
On June 7, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a subsequent license renewal (SLR) application for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to renew ONS’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The SLR would extend operations of the facility from 60 to 80 years. The current licenses for units 1 and 2 expire in 2033 and the license for unit 3 expires in 2034. By a Federal Register Notice dated July 28, 2021, the NRC provided a 60-day comment period for persons whose interest may be affected by the issuance of a subsequent renewed license for ONS to file a request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene. On September 27, 2021, Beyond Nuclear and Sierra Club (Petitioners) filed a Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene (Hearing Request) and a Petition for Waiver. The Hearing Request proposed three contentions and claimed that Duke Energy Carolinas did not satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, or the NRC’s NEPA-implementing regulations. Following Duke Energy Carolinas' answer and the Petitioners' reply, on February 11, 2022, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) issued its decision on the Hearing Request and found that the Petitioners failed to establish that the proposed contentions are litigable. The ASLB also denied the Petitioners' Petition for Waiver and terminated the proceeding.
On February 24, 2022, the NRC issued a decision in the SLR appeal related to Florida Power and Light's Turkey Point nuclear generating station in Florida. The NRC ruled that the NRC’s license renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) does not apply to SLR because the GEIS does not address SLR. The decision overturned a 2020 NRC decision that found the GEIS applies to SLR. Although Turkey Point is not owned or operated by a Duke Energy Registrant, the NRC’s order applies to all SLR applicants, including ONS. The NRC order also indicated no subsequent renewed licenses will be issued until the NRC staff has completed an adequate NEPA review for each application. On April 5, 2022, the NRC approved a 24-month rulemaking plan that will enable the NRC staff to complete an adequate NEPA review. Although an SLR applicant may wait until the rulemaking is completed, the NRC also noted that an applicant may submit a supplement to its environmental report providing information on environmental impacts during the SLR period prior to the rulemaking being completed. On November 7, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a supplement to its environmental report addressing environmental impacts during the SLR period. On December 19, 2022, the NRC published a notice in the Federal Register that the NRC will conduct a limited scoping process to gather additional information necessary to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental impacts at ONS during the SLR period. The NRC received comments from the EPA and the Petitioners and these comments identify eighteen potential impacts that should be considered by the NRC in the EIS, which include, but are not limited to, climate change and flooding, environmental justice, severe accidents, and external events. Currently, the NRC expects to publish a draft EIS in October 2023.
On December 19, 2022, the NRC issued the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the safety portion of the SLR application. The NRC determined Duke Energy Carolinas met the requirements of the applicable regulations and identified actions that have been taken or will be taken to manage the effects of aging and address time-limited analyses. Duke Energy Carolinas and the NRC met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) on February 2, 2023, to discuss issues regarding the SER and SLR application, after which the ACRS will issue a report discussing the result of its review.
Although the NRC’s GEIS applicability decision will delay completion of the SLR proceeding, Duke Energy Carolinas does not believe it changes the probability that the ONS subsequent renewed licenses will ultimately be issued, although Duke Energy Carolinas cannot guarantee the outcome of the license application process.
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. New depreciation rates were implemented for all of the nuclear facilities during the second quarter of 2021. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these additional relicensing proceedings.
140

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Progress
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$1,418 $1,389 (g)(b)
AROs – nuclear and other869 613 (c)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(l)
705 303 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(d)
417 351 Yes(j)
Storm cost securitized balance, net720 759 2041
Storm cost deferrals
234 170 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals
55 60 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses42 47 Yes2054
Retired generation facilities
149 171 Yes(b)
Deferred asset - Harris COLA21 21 (b)
AMI81 92 Yes(b)
Customer connect project
54 57 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual
43 42 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses78 28 Yes(b)
DSM/EE(d)
180 218 (h)(h)
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 (f)2042
Nuclear deferral64 42 2024
COR settlement32 32 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs25 23 Yes(b)
Other70 68 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,414 4,651 
Less: current portion690 533 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,724 $4,118 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(k)
$1,559 $1,695 (b)
Costs of removal(d)
2,269 2,955 Yes(i)
Hedge cost deferrals252 155 (b)
Provision for rate refunds28 87 Yes(b)
Other344 357 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities4,452 5,249 
Less: current portion332 381 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$4,120 $4,868 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Recovery period for costs related to nuclear facilities runs through the decommissioning period of each unit.
(d)    Included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    South Carolina retail allocated costs are earning a return.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(i)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(j)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(k)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(l)    Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in August 2022 for recovery of $251 million, which included deferrals through June 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through November 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in April 2022 for recovery of $44 million, which included deferrals through February 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through June 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023.
141

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2022 North Carolina Rate Case
On October 6, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The rate request before the NCUC includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $326 million in Year 1, $151 million in Year 2 and $138 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $615 million or 16% by late 2025. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Progress plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on June 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by October 1, 2023. The evidentiary hearing has been scheduled to begin on May 1, 2023. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On November 8, 2018,September 1, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $59 million, which representsto request an approximate 10.3% increase in annual base rate retail revenues. The request for rate increase was driven by capital investments and environmental compliance progress made by Duke Energy Progress since its previous rate case, including the further implementation of Duke Energy Progress’ generation modernization program, which consists of retiring, replacing and upgrading generation plants, investments in customer service technologies and continued investments in base work to maintain its transmission and distribution systems. The request included a decrease resulting from the Tax Act of $17 million to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The request also included $10 million to return EDIT resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change (EDIT Rider) and a $12 million increase due to the expiration of EDITs related to reductions in North Carolina state income taxes allocable to South Carolina.
Duke Energy Progress also requested approval of its proposed GIP, approval of a Prepaid Advantage Program and a variety of accounting orders related to ongoing costs for environmental compliance, including recovery over a five-year period of $51 million of deferred coal ash related compliance costs, AMI deployment, grid investments between rate changes and regulatory asset treatment related to the retirement of a generating plant located in Asheville, North Carolina. Finally, Duke Energy Progress sought approval to establish a reserve and accrual for end-of-life nuclear costs for materials and supplies and nuclear fuel. On March 8, 2019, the ORS moved to establish a new and separate hearing docket to review and consider the GIP proposed by Duke Energy Progress. Subsequently, on MarchJanuary 12, 2019, the ORS and Duke Energy Carolinas executed a Stipulation resolving the ORS’s motion, and Duke Energy Progress agreed to the Stipulation, as did other parties in the rate case. The Stipulation provides that costs incurred for the GIP after January 1, 2019, would be deferred with a return, with all costs subject to evaluation in a future rate proceeding. The Stipulation was approved by the PSCSC on June 19, 2019. On December 16, 2019, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas filed a Joint Petition to Establish an Informational Docket for Review and Consideration of Grid Improvement Plans through which Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Carolinas would provide interested stakeholders information on the companies' grid activities. The PSCSC requested parties comment on procedural matters by January 31; accordingly, various groups filed comments, none of which opposed an informational docket. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
After hearings in April 2019, the PSCSC issued an order on May 21, 2019, which included a return on equity of 9.5% and a capital structure of 53% equity and 47% debt. The order also included the following material components:
Approval of recovery of $4 million of coal ash costs over a five-year period with a return at Duke Energy Progress' WACC;

142




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Denial of recovery of $65 million of certain coal ash costs deemed to be related to the Coal Ash Act and incremental to the federal CCR rule;
Approval of a $17 million decrease to base rates to reflect the change in ongoing tax expense, primarily the reduction in the federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%;
Approval of a $12 million decrease through the EDIT Tax Savings Rider resulting from the federal tax rate change and deferred revenues since January 2018 related to the change, to be returned in accordance with ARAM for protected EDIT, over a 20-year period for unprotected EDIT associated with Property, Plant and Equipment, over a five-year period for unprotected EDIT not associated with Property, Plant and Equipment and over a three-year period for the deferred revenues; and
Approval of a $12 million increase due to the expiration of EDIT related to reductions in the North Carolina state income tax rate from 6.9% to 2.5%.
As a result of the order, revised customer rates were effective June 1, 2019. On May 31, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a Petition for Rehearing or Reconsideration of that order contending substantial rights of Duke Energy Progress were prejudiced by unlawful, arbitrary and capricious rulings by the commission on certain issues presented in the proceeding. On June 19, 2019, the PSCSC issued a Directive denying Duke Energy Progress' request to rehear or reconsider the commission's rulings on certain issues presented in the proceeding including coal ash remediation and disposal costs, return on equity and the recovery of a return on deferred operation and maintenance expenses, but allowing additional litigation-related costs. As a result of the Directive allowing litigation-related costs, customer rates were revised effective July 1, 2019. An order detailing the commission's decision in the Directive was issued on October 18, 2019. Duke Energy Progress filed a notice of appeal on November 15, 2019, with the South Carolina Supreme Court. The ORS filed a Notice of Cross Appeal on November 20, 2019. On January 8, 2020,2023, Duke Energy Progress and the ORS, as well as other consumer, environmental, and industrial intervening parties, filed a joint motioncomprehensive Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement resolving all issues in the base rate proceeding. The major components of the stipulation include:
A $52 million annual customer rate increase prior to extend briefing schedule deadlines. Appellant briefs are due on March 2, 2020,the reduction from the accelerated return to customers of federal unprotected Property, Plant and Appellee response briefs are on May 15, 2020. On February 12, 2020,Equipment related EDIT. After extending the remaining EDIT giveback to customers to 33 months, the net annual retail rate increase is approximately $36 million.
ROE of 9.6% based upon a capital structure of 52.43% equity and 47.57% debt.
Continuation of deferral treatment of coal ash basin closure costs. Supports an amortization period for remaining coal ash closure costs in this rate case of seven years. Duke Energy Progress and the ORS filed a joint motionagreed not to extend briefing deadlines by 30 days. Based on legal analysis and the filingseek recovery of the appeal, Duke Energy Progress has not recorded an adjustment for itsapproximately $50 million of deferred coal ash costs. Duke Energy Progress cannot predictexpenditures related to retired sites in this rate case (South Carolina retail allocation).
Accepts the outcome2021 Depreciation Study as proposed in this case, as adjusted for certain recommendations from ORS and includes accelerated retirement dates for certain coal units as originally proposed.
Establishment of this matter.
Western Carolinas Modernization Plan
On November 4, 2015, Duke Energy Progress announced a Western Carolinas Modernization Plan, which included retirementstorm reserve to help offset the costs of the existing Asheville coal-fired plant, the construction of 2 280MW combined-cycle natural gas plants having dual-fuel capability, with the option to build a third natural gas simple cycle unit in 2023 based upon the outcome of initiatives to reduce the region's power demand. The plan also included upgrades to existing transmission lines and substations, installation of solar generation and a pilot battery storage project. Duke Energy Progress worked with the local natural gas distribution company to upgrade and lease an existing natural gas pipeline to serve the natural gas plant. The lease for the new pipeline became effective on March 2, 2019.major storms.
On March 28, 2016,The PSCSC held a hearing on January 17, 2023, to consider evidence supporting the NCUC issued an order approving a CPCN forstipulation and unanimously voted to approve the new combined-cycle natural gas plants, but is requiringcomprehensive agreement on February 9, 2023. The PSCSC voted to allow Duke Energy Progress to refile for CPCN approval forimplement new customer rates by April 1, 2023. A final written order is due from the contingent simple cycle unit. OnPSCSC by March 28, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed an annual progress report for the construction of the combined-cycle plants with the NCUC, with an estimated cost of $893 million.
On December 27, 2019, Asheville Combined Cycle Power Block 1, and the common systems that serve both combined cycle units went into commercial operation. Power Block 1 consists of the Unit 5 Combustion Turbine and Unit 6 Steam Turbine Generator (which together form the first combined cycle unit approved in the CPCN Order). Power Block 2 consists of the Unit 7 Combustion Turbine and Unit 8 Steam Turbine Generator (which together form the second combined cycle unit approved in the CPCN Order). Duke Energy Progress placed the Unit 7 Combustion Turbine portion of Power Block 2 into commercial operation in simple-cycle mode on January 15, 2020. Duke Energy Progress currently expects to place the Unit 8 Steam Turbine Generator into commercial operation in the first quarter of 2020, after final testing has been completed.2023.
On October 8, 2018, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the NCUC for a CPCN to construct the Hot Springs Microgrid Solar and Battery Storage Facility. On March 22, 2019, Duke Energy Progress and the Public Staff filed a Joint Proposed Order. On May 10, 2019, the NCUC issued an Order Granting Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity with Conditions. On November 19, 2019, Duke Energy Progress filed a semiannual progress report for its Hot Springs Microgrid Solar and Battery Storage Facility. As required by an NCUC order issued December 6, 2019, an updated progress report was filed on January 15, 2020. Construction is expected to begin in March 2020 with commercial operation expected to begin in September 2020.
The carrying value of the 376-MW Asheville coal-fired plant, including associated ash basin closure costs, of $214 million and $327 million is included in Generation facilities to be retired, net on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. Duke Energy Progress' request for a regulatory asset at the time of retirement with amortization over a 10-year period was approved by the NCUC on February 23, 2018. Duke Energy Progress retired the Asheville coal-fired plant on January 29, 2020.
FERC ReturnDuke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio has two reportable segments, EU&I and GU&I.
EU&I transmits and distributes electricity in portions of Ohio and generates, distributes and sells electricity in portions of Northern Kentucky. GU&I transports and sells natural gas in portions of Ohio and Northern Kentucky. Both reportable segments conduct operations primarily through Duke Energy Ohio and its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky. The remainder of Duke Energy Ohio's operations is presented as Other.
All Duke Energy Ohio assets and revenues from continuing operations are within the U.S.
Year Ended December 31, 2022
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,798 $716 $2,514 $ $ $2,514 
Interest expense$86 $43 $129 $ $ $129 
Depreciation and amortization221 103 324   324 
Income tax expense (benefit)24 (43)(19)(2) (21)
Segment income (loss)/Net income189 121 310 (8) 302 
Capital expenditures$488 $362 $850 $ $ $850 
Segment assets7,504 4,164 11,668 14 (176)11,506 
133

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS
Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,493 $544 $2,037 $— $— $2,037 
Interest expense$87 $24 $111 $— $— $111 
Depreciation and amortization217 90 307 — — 307 
Income tax expense (benefit)15 19 34 (4)— 30 
Segment income (loss)/Net Income141 78 219 (15)— 204 
Capital expenditures$486 $362 $848 $— $— $848 
Segment assets6,882 3,892 10,774 29 (29)10,774 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,405 $453 $1,858 $— $— $1,858 
Interest expense$85 $17 $102 $— $— $102 
Depreciation and amortization200 78 278 — — 278 
Income tax expense (benefit)19 26 45 (2)— 43 
Segment income (loss)162 96 258 (6)— 252 
Capital expenditures$548 $286 $834 $— $— $834 
Segment assets6,615 3,380 9,995 32 (2)10,025 
4. REGULATORY MATTERS
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants record regulatory assets and liabilities that result from the ratemaking process. See Note 1 for further information.
134

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Equity Complaintthe Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy and Progress Energy. See separate tables below for balances by individual registrant.
On October 11,
Duke EnergyProgress Energy
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Regulatory Assets
AROs – coal ash$3,205 $3,408 $1,429 $1,399 
AROs – nuclear and other945 684 884 620 
Deferred fuel and purchased power3,866 1,253 2,060 718 
Accrued pension and OPEB2,336 2,017 759 725 
Storm cost securitized balance, net940 991 720 759 
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 881 937 
Debt fair value adjustment829 884  — 
Storm cost deferrals666 213 559 189 
Hedge costs deferrals378 348 128 137 
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses342 356 42 47 
Retired generation facilities316 357 243 265 
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA288 317 21 21 
Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI)283 311 111 130 
Customer connect project271 242 136 124 
Costs of removal regulatory asset221 107 221 107 
Vacation accrual222 221 43 42 
Incremental COVID-19 expenses210 87 78 28 
CEP deferral190 161  — 
Demand side management (DSM)/Energy efficiency (EE)189 235 188 230 
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts168 139  — 
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 157 165 
Nuclear deferral154 120 64 42 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs121 108  — 
COR settlement120 123 32 32 
Deferred coal ash handling system costs92 90 25 23 
Qualifying facility contract buyouts81 94 81 94 
Amounts due from customers57 85  — 
Propane caverns26 —  — 
Deferred severance charges21 54 7 18 
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104  — 
Other555 426 110 87 
Total regulatory assets18,130 14,637 8,979 6,939 
Less: current portion3,485 2,150 1,833 1,030 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$14,645 $12,487 $7,146 $5,909 
Regulatory Liabilities
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$6,462 $7,199 $2,192 $2,394 
Costs of removal5,151 6,150 2,269 2,955 
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053  — 
Hedge cost deferrals683 364 252 155 
Accrued pension and OPEB211 213  — 
DOE Settlement154 — 154 — 
Provision for rate refunds78 274 28 87 
Amounts to be refunded to customers45 —  — 
Other1,226 1,110 434 453 
Total regulatory liabilities15,048 17,363 5,329 6,044 
Less: current portion1,466 1,211 576 478 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$13,582 $16,152 $4,753 $5,566 
Descriptions of regulatory assets and liabilities summarized in the tables above and below follow. See tables below for recovery and amortization periods at the separate registrants.
AROs coal ash. Represents deferred depreciation and accretion related to the legal obligation to close ash basins. The costs are deferred until recovery treatment has been determined. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
135

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
AROs nuclear and other. Represents regulatory assets or liabilities, including deferred depreciation and accretion, related to legal obligations associated with the future retirement of property, plant and equipment, excluding amounts related to coal ash. The AROs relate primarily to decommissioning nuclear power facilities. The amounts also include certain deferred gains and losses on NDTF investments. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
Deferred fuel and purchased power. Represents certain energy-related costs that are recoverable or refundable as approved by the applicable regulatory body.
Accrued pension and OPEB. Accrued pension and OPEB represent regulatory assets and liabilities related to each of the Duke Energy Registrants’ respective shares of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service cost and credit attributable to Duke Energy’s pension plans and OPEB plans. The regulatory asset or liability is amortized with the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost and credit to net periodic benefit costs for pension and OPEB plans. The accrued pension and OPEB regulatory assets are expected to be recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Storm cost securitized balance, net. Represents the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego (2018 and 2019 NCEMPA filedevents).
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net.Represents the balance associated with Crystal River Unit 3 retirement approved for recovery by the FPSC on September 15, 2015, and the upfront financing costs securitized in 2016 with issuance of the associated bonds. The regulatory asset balance is net of the AFUDC equity portion.
Debt fair value adjustment. Purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of Progress Energy and Piedmont at fair value in connection with the 2012 and 2016 mergers, respectively. Amount is amortized over the life of the related debt.
Storm cost deferrals. Represents deferred incremental costs incurred related to major weather-related events.
Hedge costs deferrals. Amounts relate to unrealized gains and losses on derivatives recorded as a complaintregulatory asset or liability, respectively, until the contracts are settled.
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses. Represents deferred depreciation and operating expenses as well as carrying costs on the portion of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.
Retired generation facilities. Represents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA. Represents deferred costs incurred for the canceled Lee and Harris nuclear projects.
AMI. Represents deferred costs related to the installation of AMI meters and remaining net book value of non-AMI meters to be replaced at FERC against Duke Energy Carolinas, net book value of existing meters at Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress pursuantand Duke Energy Ohio and future recovery of net book value of electromechanical meters that have been replaced with AMI meters at Duke Energy Indiana.
Customer connect project. Represents incremental operating expenses and carrying costs on deferred amounts related to Section 206the deployment of the Federal Power Act (FPA). The complaint alleges that the return on equity componentnew customer information system.
Vacation accrual. Represents vacation entitlement, which is generally recovered in the formulafollowing year.
Incremental COVID-19 expenses. Representsincremental costs related to ensuring continuity and quality of service in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CEP deferral. Represents deferred depreciation, PISCC and deferred property tax for Duke Energy Ohio Gas capital assets for the Capital Expenditure Program (CEP).
DSM/EE. Deferred costs related to various DSM and EE programs recoverable through various mechanisms.
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts. Represents costs for certain long-dated, fixed quantity forward natural gas supply contracts, which are recoverable through PGA clauses.
NCEMPA deferrals. Represents retail allocated cost deferrals and returns associated with the additional ownership interest in assets acquired from NCEMPA in 2015.
Nuclear deferral. Includes amounts related to levelizing nuclear plant outage costs, which allows for the recognition of nuclear outage expenses over the refueling cycle rather than when the outage occurs, resulting in the deferral of operations and maintenance costs associated with refueling.
Deferred pipeline integrity costs. Represents pipeline integrity management costs in compliance with federal regulations.
COR settlement. Represents approved COR settlements that are being amortized over the average remaining lives, at the time of approval, of the associated assets.
Deferred coal ash handling system costs. Represents deferred depreciation and returns associated with capital assets related to converting the ash handling system from wet to dry.
Qualifying facility contract buyouts. Represents termination payments for regulatory recovery through the capacity clause.
Amounts due from customers. Relates primarily to margin decoupling and IMR recovery mechanisms.
136

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Costs of removal regulatory asset. Represents the excess of spend over funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired, net of certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
Propane Caverns. Represents amounts for costs related to propane inventory, the net book value of remaining assets and decommissioning costs at Duke Energy Ohio.
MGP. Represents remediation costs incurred at former MGP sites and the deferral of costs to be incurred at Duke Energy Ohio's East End and West End sites.
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes. Amounts for all registrants include regulatory liabilities related primarily to impacts from the Tax Act. See Note 24 for additional information. Amounts have no immediate impact on rate contained withinbase as regulatory assets are offset by deferred tax liabilities.
Costs of removal. Represents funds received from customers to cover the Full Requirements Power Purchase Agreement (FRPPA)future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is unjustretired. Also includes certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
DOE Settlement. Represents litigation settlement funds received resulting from the DOE’s failure to accept spent nuclear fuel and unreasonable. other radioactive waste from the Crystal River Unit 3 during 2014-2018 as required under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
Provision for rate refunds. Represents estimated amounts due to customers based on recording interim rates subject to refund.
RESTRICTIONS ON THE ABILITY OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES TO MAKE DIVIDENDS, ADVANCES AND LOANS TO DUKE ENERGY
As a condition to the approval of merger transactions, the NCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, KPSC and IURC imposed conditions on the ability of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont to transfer funds to Duke Energy through loans or advances, as well as restricted amounts available to pay dividends to Duke Energy. Certain subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Parent by obtaining approval of the respective state regulatory commissions. These conditions imposed restrictions on the ability of the public utility subsidiaries to pay cash dividends as discussed below.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also have restrictions imposed by their first mortgage bond indentures, which in certain circumstances, limit their ability to make cash dividends or distributions on common stock. Amounts restricted as a result of these provisions were not material at December 31, 2022.
Additionally, certain other subsidiaries of Duke Energy have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to Duke Energy due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, minimum working capital and tangible net worth requirements.
The FRPPA’s returnrestrictions discussed below were not a material amount of Duke Energy's and Progress Energy's net assets at December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Duke Energy Carolinas must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to mergers to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Progress
Duke Energy Progress must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the mergers between Duke Energy and Progress Energy and Duke Energy and Piedmont to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the respective mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without the prior authorization of the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio received FERC and PUCO approval to pay dividends from its equity is 11% asaccounts that are reflective of the amount that it would have in its retained earnings account had push-down accounting for the Cinergy merger not been applied to Duke Energy Ohio’s balance sheet. The conditions include a commitment from Duke Energy Ohio that equity, adjusted to remove the Production Capacity Rate forimpacts of push-down accounting, will not fall below 30% of total capital.
Duke Energy Kentucky is required to pay dividends solely out of retained earnings and to maintain a minimum of 35% equity in its capital structure.
Duke Energy Indiana
Duke Energy Indiana must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the full requirements service providedmerger between Duke Energy and Cinergy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded. In addition, Duke Energy Indiana will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without prior authorization of the IURC.
Piedmont
Piedmont must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the acquisition of Piedmont by Duke Energy Progress. The complaint does not definitively propose a replacement returnto (i) the amount of retained earnings on equity. Under FPA Section 206, the earliest refund effective date that FERC can establish isday prior to the dateclosing of the filingmerger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
RATE-RELATED INFORMATION
The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, IURC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC approve rates for retail electric and natural gas services within their states. The FERC approves rates for electric sales to wholesale customers served under cost-based rates (excluding Ohio and Indiana), as well as sales of the complaint.transmission service. The complaint could raise risks acrossFERC also regulates certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects.
137

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress
Hurricane Ian
In late September and early October 2022, Hurricane Ian inflicted severe damage to the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress wholesale business because, dependingterritories in North Carolina and South Carolina. Approximately 950,000 customers were impacted. Total estimated operation and maintenance expenses incurred for restoration efforts for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately $100 million, with an additional $9 million in capital investments. Approximately $83 million of the operation and maintenance expenses are deferred in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on how FERC treats NCEMPA's complaint,the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 ($40 million and $43 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have regulatory tools to recover storm costs including deferral and securitization. These estimates could change as Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress receive additional information on actual costs.
Carbon Plan Proceeding
On October 13, 2021, North Carolina enacted legislation (Energy Solutions for North Carolina or HB 951) that established a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance North Carolina CO2 emission reductions from electric generating facilities in the state through the use of least cost planning while providing for continued reliability and affordable rates for customers. Among other things, HB 951 directed that the NCUC approve an initial carbon plan (Carbon Plan) by December 31, 2022, taking all reasonable steps to achieve a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from public utilities’ electric generating facilities in the state by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and achieve carbon neutrality from electric generating facilities by 2050 while maintaining affordability and reliability for customers. On May 16, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed their proposed Carolinas Carbon Plan (Proposed Plan) with the NCUC.
The NCUC issued an order on December 30, 2022, adopting the first Carbon Plan. The order recognizes the value of an “all-of-the-above” approach to achieving CO2 emission reductions and established a set of near-term procurement and development activities needed to continue progress towards the targeted CO2 reductions, along with the schedule for the future biennial updates to the Carbon Plan. The approved near-term action plan includes procurement and development of solar, storage and hydrogen-capable natural gas generation at levels consistent with the Proposed Plan, along with upgrading key transmission facilities to strengthen the grid, improve resilience for customers and interconnect new solar generation and stakeholder engagement activities for onshore wind generation (in all cases, subject to any further applicable regulatory processes). The order also approved early development activities for long lead-time resources, including new nuclear, pumped-hydro storage and offshore wind transmission development. The NCUC affirmed the utility ownership structure required in HB 951; all new generation facilities or other resources selected by the NCUC to achieve the CO2 emission reductions shall be owned and recovered on a cost-of-service basis by the utilities, with a carveout for 45% of solar and solar plus storage generation to be procured through long-term purchase power agreements with third parties. The order approves continued utilization of the remaining coal-fired generation assets, ensuring that appropriate replacement generating units and associated transmission infrastructure are in service before existing generating units are retired and providing an orderly transition out of coal generation by 2035.
Storm Cost Securitization Legislation
On June 15, 2022, the South Carolina General Assembly unanimously adopted S. 1077 (Act 227) in both the House and Senate and the bill was signed into law on June 17, 2022. The legislation enables the PSCSC to permit the issuance of bonds for the payment of storm costs and the creation of a storm charge for repayment.
On August 5, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a petition with the PSCSC for review and approval of deferred storm costs to be securitized of approximately $223 million. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on or after March 1, 2023. On February 7, 2023, a stipulation was reached with all parties may come forward with similar complaints. in the proceeding regarding certain items identified through the Office of Regulatory Staff (ORS) audit of storm costs. The final amount for securitization will depend on the outcome of the hearing.Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

143
138





FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Duke Energy FloridaCarolinas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Florida'sCarolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)2019
2018
 a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
     
AROs – coal ash(c)
$9
$10
  (b)
AROs – nuclear and other(c)
159
172
  (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
474
532
 Yes(g)
Storm cost deferrals(c)
413
382
 (e)2021
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net1,042
1,093
  2036
Deferred fuel and purchased power39
203
 (f)2021
Hedge costs deferrals44
20
  2038
DSM/EE(c)
25
21
 Yes2024
AMI(c)
53
60
 Yes2032
Retired generation facilities(c)
183
219
 Yes(b)
Other172
176
 (d)(b)
Total regulatory assets2,613
2,888
   
Less: current portion419
434
   
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$2,194
$2,454
   
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
     
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(c)
$793
$847
  (b)
Costs of removal(c)
267
257
 (d)(b)
Accrued pension and OPEB
56
 Yes(g)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(c)
1
16
 (f)2021
Other26
20
 (d)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,087
1,196
   
Less: current portion94
102
   
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$993
$1,094
   
(a)Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)Included in rate base.
(d)Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(e)Earns a debt return/interest once collections begin.
(f)Earns commercial paper rate.
(g)Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Storm Restoration Cost Recovery
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$1,391 $1,227 (g)(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(i)
1,614 339 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
614 365 Yes(h)
Storm cost securitized balance, net220 232 2041
Storm cost deferrals
93 22 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
228 171 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
30 31 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
39 54 Yes(b)
Deferred asset – Lee COLA267 296 (b)
AMI139 140 Yes(b)
Customer connect project62 66 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual84 83 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses127 51 Yes(b)
Nuclear deferral90 78 2024
COR settlement88 91 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs67 67 Yes(b)
Other235 166 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,388 3,479 
Less: current portion1,095 544 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,293 $2,935 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(d)
$2,475 $2,785 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
1,769 2,009 Yes(f)
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053 (b)
Hedge cost deferrals
350 209 (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
44 44 Yes(h)
Provision for rate refunds50 124 Yes(b)
Other587 461 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities6,313 7,685 
Less: current portion530 487 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$5,783 $7,198 
In September 2017, Duke Energy Florida’s service territory suffered significant damage(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from Hurricane Irma, resultingrate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)     Included in approximately 1 million customers experiencing outages. In the fourth quarter of 2017, Duke Energy Florida also incurred preparation costsrate base.
(d)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to Hurricane Nate. On December 28, 2017, Duke Energy Florida filedthe change in the federal tax rate as a petition with the FPSC to recover incremental storm restoration costs for Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Nate and to replenish the storm reserve. On February 6, 2018, the FPSC approved a stipulation that would apply tax savings resulting fromresult of the Tax Act toward stormand the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs effective January 2018 in lieuNorth Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of implementingdistributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(g)    Earns a storm surcharge. On May 31, 2018,debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(i)    Duke Energy FloridaCarolinas submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in May 2022 for recovery of $327 million, which included deferrals through January 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through August 2023. The next filing will be made in the first quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in July 2022 for recovery of $79 million, which included deferrals through May 2022. The amount is expected to be recovered through September 2023. The next filing will be made in the third quarter of 2023.
2023 North Carolina Rate Case
On January 19, 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a petition for approval of actual storm restoration costsPBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The PBR Application includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and associated recovery process related to Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Nate. The petition soughtPerformance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the approval for the recovery in the amount of $510overall retail revenue increase would be $501 million in actual recoverable storm restoration costs, including the replenishmentYear 1, $172 million in Year 2 and $150 million in Year 3, for a combined total of Duke Energy Florida’s storm reserve of $132$823 million and the process for recovering these recoverable storm costs. On August 20, 2018, the FPSC approved Duke Energy Florida's unopposed Motion for Continuance filed August 17, 2018, to allow for an evidentiary hearing in this matter. On January 28, 2019, Duke Energy Florida made a supplemental filing to reduce the total storm cost recovery from $510 million to $508 million. On April 3, 2019, the FPSC issued an Order abating all remaining filing dates. On April 9, 2019, Duke Energy Florida filed an unopposed motion to approve a settlement agreement resolving all outstanding issues in this docket. On June 13, 2019, the FPSC issued its order approving the settlement agreement.or 15.7% by early 2026. The Storm Cost Settlement Agreement obligates Duke Energy Florida to capitalize $18 million of storm costs and remove $6 million of operating and maintenance expense, thereby reducing the requested storm cost recovery amountrate increase is driven primarily by $24 million. Duke Energy Florida will also implement process changes with respect to storm cost restoration. At December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheets included approximately $43 million and $217 million, respectively, of recoverable costs under the FPSC's storm rule in Regulatory assets within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets related to storm recovery for Hurricane Irma and Hurricane Nate.

144




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


In October 2018, Duke Energy Florida’s service territory suffered damage when Hurricane Michael made landfall as a Category 5 hurricane with maximum sustained winds of 160 mph. The storm caused catastrophic damage from wind and storm surge, particularly from Panama City Beach to Mexico Beach, resulting in widespread outages and significant damage tomajor transmission and distribution facilities acrossinvestments since the central Florida Panhandle. In response to Hurricane Michael,last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Florida restored serviceCarolinas plans to approximately 72,000 customers. Total estimated incremental operationimplement temporary rates, subject to refund, on September 1, 2023, and maintenance and capital costs are $311 million. Approximately $107 million and $35 million of the costs are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively. Approximately $204 million and $165 million of costs are included in Regulatory assets within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019, and December 31, 2018, respectively, representing recoverable costs under the FPSC’s storm rule and has requested permanent rates be effective by January 1, 2024. Duke Energy Florida's OATT formula rates.
Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on April 30, 2019, to recover the retail portion of incremental storm restoration costs for Hurricane Michael. On June 11, 2019, the FPSC approved the petition for recovery of incremental storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Michael. The FPSC also approved the stipulation Duke Energy Florida filed, which will allow Duke Energy Florida to use the tax savings resulting from the Tax Act to recover these storm costs in lieu of implementing a storm surcharge. Approved storm costs are currently expected to be fully recovered by approximately year-end 2021. On November 22, 2019, Duke Energy Florida filed a petition for approval of actual retail recoverable storm restoration costs related to Hurricane Michael in the amount of $191 million plus interest. An Order Establishing Procedure was issued on January 30, 2020, and hearings are scheduled to begin September 15, 2020. Duke Energy FloridaCarolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Hurricane Dorian
139

In September 2019,
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Oconee Nuclear Station Subsequent License Renewal
On June 7, 2021, Duke Energy Florida’sCarolinas filed a subsequent license renewal (SLR) application for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to renew ONS’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The SLR would extend operations of the facility from 60 to 80 years. The current licenses for units 1 and 2 expire in 2033 and the license for unit 3 expires in 2034. By a Federal Register Notice dated July 28, 2021, the NRC provided a 60-day comment period for persons whose interest may be affected by the issuance of a subsequent renewed license for ONS to file a request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene. On September 27, 2021, Beyond Nuclear and Sierra Club (Petitioners) filed a Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene (Hearing Request) and a Petition for Waiver. The Hearing Request proposed three contentions and claimed that Duke Energy Carolinas did not satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, or the NRC’s NEPA-implementing regulations. Following Duke Energy Carolinas' answer and the Petitioners' reply, on February 11, 2022, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) issued its decision on the Hearing Request and found that the Petitioners failed to establish that the proposed contentions are litigable. The ASLB also denied the Petitioners' Petition for Waiver and terminated the proceeding.
On February 24, 2022, the NRC issued a decision in the SLR appeal related to Florida Power and Light's Turkey Point nuclear generating station in Florida. The NRC ruled that the NRC’s license renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) does not apply to SLR because the GEIS does not address SLR. The decision overturned a 2020 NRC decision that found the GEIS applies to SLR. Although Turkey Point is not owned or operated by a Duke Energy Registrant, the NRC’s order applies to all SLR applicants, including ONS. The NRC order also indicated no subsequent renewed licenses will be issued until the NRC staff has completed an adequate NEPA review for each application. On April 5, 2022, the NRC approved a 24-month rulemaking plan that will enable the NRC staff to complete an adequate NEPA review. Although an SLR applicant may wait until the rulemaking is completed, the NRC also noted that an applicant may submit a supplement to its environmental report providing information on environmental impacts during the SLR period prior to the rulemaking being completed. On November 7, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a supplement to its environmental report addressing environmental impacts during the SLR period. On December 19, 2022, the NRC published a notice in the Federal Register that the NRC will conduct a limited scoping process to gather additional information necessary to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental impacts at ONS during the SLR period. The NRC received comments from the EPA and the Petitioners and these comments identify eighteen potential impacts that should be considered by the NRC in the EIS, which include, but are not limited to, climate change and flooding, environmental justice, severe accidents, and external events. Currently, the NRC expects to publish a draft EIS in October 2023.
On December 19, 2022, the NRC issued the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the safety portion of the SLR application. The NRC determined Duke Energy Carolinas met the requirements of the applicable regulations and identified actions that have been taken or will be taken to manage the effects of aging and address time-limited analyses. Duke Energy Carolinas and the NRC met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) on February 2, 2023, to discuss issues regarding the SER and SLR application, after which the ACRS will issue a report discussing the result of its review.
Although the NRC’s GEIS applicability decision will delay completion of the SLR proceeding, Duke Energy Carolinas does not believe it changes the probability that the ONS subsequent renewed licenses will ultimately be issued, although Duke Energy Carolinas cannot guarantee the outcome of the license application process.
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. New depreciation rates were implemented for all of the nuclear facilities during the second quarter of 2021. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these additional relicensing proceedings.
140

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Progress
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$1,418 $1,389 (g)(b)
AROs – nuclear and other869 613 (c)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(l)
705 303 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(d)
417 351 Yes(j)
Storm cost securitized balance, net720 759 2041
Storm cost deferrals
234 170 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals
55 60 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses42 47 Yes2054
Retired generation facilities
149 171 Yes(b)
Deferred asset - Harris COLA21 21 (b)
AMI81 92 Yes(b)
Customer connect project
54 57 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual
43 42 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses78 28 Yes(b)
DSM/EE(d)
180 218 (h)(h)
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 (f)2042
Nuclear deferral64 42 2024
COR settlement32 32 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs25 23 Yes(b)
Other70 68 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,414 4,651 
Less: current portion690 533 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,724 $4,118 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(k)
$1,559 $1,695 (b)
Costs of removal(d)
2,269 2,955 Yes(i)
Hedge cost deferrals252 155 (b)
Provision for rate refunds28 87 Yes(b)
Other344 357 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities4,452 5,249 
Less: current portion332 381 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$4,120 $4,868 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Recovery period for costs related to nuclear facilities runs through the decommissioning period of each unit.
(d)    Included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    South Carolina retail allocated costs are earning a return.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(i)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(j)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service territory was threatenedperiods or life expectancies of employees covered by Hurricane Dorian with landfallthe benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(k)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a possible Category 5 hurricane. For several days, various forecastsresult of the Tax Act and models predicted significant impact to Duke Energy Florida’s service territory; accordingly, Duke Energy Florida incurred costs to secure necessary resources to be prepared for that potential impact. Although Hurricane Dorian never made landfallthe change in Florida, its effects were still felt, and outages did occur. Preparations were required so that, if Hurricane Dorian had made landfall and impacts had been more severe, Duke Energy Florida would have been prepared to restore its customers’ powerthe North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in a timely fashion.
Total current estimated incremental costs are approximately $167 million. These costsNote 24. Portions are included in Regulatory assets within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019, representing recoverable costs under the FPSC’s storm rule andrate base.
(l)    Duke Energy Florida's OATT formula rates. On December 19, 2019,Progress submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in August 2022 for recovery of $251 million, which included deferrals through June 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through November 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023. Duke Energy FloridaProgress submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in April 2022 for recovery of $44 million, which included deferrals through February 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through June 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023.
141

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2022 North Carolina Rate Case
On October 6, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a petitionPBR application with the FPSCNCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The rate request before the NCUC includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the estimatedthree year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail portionrevenue increase would be $326 million in Year 1, $151 million in Year 2 and $138 million in Year 3, for a combined total of these costs,$615 million or 16% by late 2025. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the provisions in the 2017 Settlement. The request seeks recovery over a 12-month period beginning in March 2020. The final actual amount will be filed later in 2020 and a hearing will be held at the FPSC to determine the final amount of incremental costs. Carbon Plan. Duke Energy FloridaProgress plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on June 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by October 1, 2023. The evidentiary hearing has been scheduled to begin on May 1, 2023. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Tax Act2022 South Carolina Rate Case
Pursuant toOn September 1, 2022, Duke Energy Florida's 2017 Settlement, on May 31, 2018,Progress filed an application with the PSCSC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. On January 12, 2023, Duke Energy FloridaProgress and the ORS, as well as other consumer, environmental, and industrial intervening parties, filed a petitioncomprehensive Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement resolving all issues in the base rate proceeding. The major components of the stipulation include:
A $52 million annual customer rate increase prior to the reduction from the accelerated return to customers of federal unprotected Property, Plant and Equipment related EDIT. After extending the remaining EDIT giveback to customers to 33 months, the net annual retail rate increase is approximately $36 million.
ROE of 9.6% based upon a capital structure of 52.43% equity and 47.57% debt.
Continuation of deferral treatment of coal ash basin closure costs. Supports an amortization period for remaining coal ash closure costs in this rate case of seven years. Duke Energy Progress agreed not to seek recovery of approximately $50 million of deferred coal ash expenditures related to retired sites in this rate case (South Carolina retail allocation).
Accepts the Tax Act, which included revenue requirement impacts of annual tax savings of $134 million2021 Depreciation Study as proposed in this case, as adjusted for certain recommendations from ORS and estimated annual amortization of EDIT of $67 millionincludes accelerated retirement dates for a total of $201 million. Of this amount, $50 million would be offset by accelerated depreciation of Crystal River 4 and 5certain coal units as originally proposed.
Establishment of a storm reserve to help offset the costs of major storms.
The PSCSC held a hearing on January 17, 2023, to consider evidence supporting the stipulation and an estimated $151 million would be offset by Hurricane Irma storm cost recovery as explained inunanimously voted to approve the Storm Restoration Cost Recovery section above. On December 27, 2018,comprehensive agreement on February 9, 2023. The PSCSC voted to allow Duke Energy Florida filed actual EDIT balances and amortization based on its 2017 filed tax return. This increased the revenue requirement impact of the amortization of EDITProgress to implement new customer rates by $4 million, from $67 million to $71 million, which increased the total storm amortization from $151 million to $155 million. On January 8, 2019, the FPSC approved a joint motion by Duke Energy Florida and the Office of Public Counsel resolving all stipulated positions. As part of that stipulation, Duke Energy Florida agreed to seek a Private Letter Ruling (PLR)April 1, 2023. A final written order is due from the IRS on its treatment of cost of removal (COR) as mostly protectedPSCSC by tax normalization rules. If the IRS rules that COR is not protected by tax normalization rules, then Duke Energy Florida will make a final adjustment to the amortization of EDIT and an adjustment to the storm recovery amount retroactive to January 2018. The IRS has communicated that it will not issue individual PLRs on the treatment of COR. Rather, the IRS is drafting a notice that will request comments on a number of issues, including COR, and the IRS plans to issue industrywide guidance on those issues. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Citrus County CC
Construction of the 1,640-MW combined-cycle natural gas plant in Citrus County, Florida, began in October 2015 with an estimated cost of $1.5 billion, including AFUDC. Both units came on-line in the fourth quarter of 2018. The ultimate cost of the facility was estimated to be $1.6 billion, and Duke Energy Florida recorded Impairment charges on Duke Energy’s Consolidated Statements of Operations of $60 million in the fourth quarter of 2018 for the overrun. In the year ended December 31, 2019, Duke Energy Florida recorded a $36 million reduction to the prior-year impairment due to a decrease in the cost estimate of the Citrus County CC, primarily related to the settlement agreement with Fluor, the EPC contractor. This adjustment reduced the estimated cost of the facility to $1.5 billion.
Solar Base Rate Adjustment
On July 31, 2018, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC to include in base rates the revenue requirements for its first two solar generation projects, the Hamilton Project and the Columbia Project, as authorized by the 2017 Settlement. The Hamilton Project, which was placed into service on December 22, 2018, has an annual retail revenue requirement of $15 million. At its October 30, 2018, Agenda Conference, the FPSC approved the rate increase related to the Hamilton Project to go into effect beginning with the first billing cycle in January 2019 under its file and suspend authority, and revised customer rates became effective in January 2019. The Columbia Project has a projected annual revenue requirement of $14 million and a projected in-service date in early 2020; the associated rate increase would take place with the first month’s billing cycle after the Columbia Project goes into service. On April 2, 2019, the commission approved both solar projects as filed.

145




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


On March 25, 2019, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC to include in base rates the revenue requirements for its next wave of solar generation projects, the Trenton, Lake Placid and DeBary Solar Projects, as authorized by the 2017 Settlement. The annual retail revenue requirement for the Trenton and Lake Placid Projects is $13 million and $8 million, respectively, and were placed into service in December 2019 with rates taking effect in January 2020. The DeBary Project has a projected annual revenue requirement of $11 million and a projected in-service date in the first half of 2020. The associated rate increase would take place with the first month’s billing cycle after each solar generation project goes into service. On July 22, 2019, the FPSC issued an order approving Duke Energy Florida's request.1, 2023.
Crystal River Unit 3 Accelerated Decommissioning Filing
On May 29, 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into a Decommissioning Services Agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of the Crystal River Unit 3 nuclear power station located in Citrus County, Florida, with ADP CR3, LLC and ADP SF1, LLC, each of which is a wholly owned subsidiary of Accelerated Decommissioning Partners, LLC, a joint venture between NorthStar Group Services, Inc. and Orano USA LLC. Closing of this agreement is contingent upon the approval of the NRC and FPSC. If approved, the decommissioning will be accelerated starting in 2020 and continuing through 2027, rather than the expected time frame under SAFSTOR of starting in 2067 and ending in 2074. Duke Energy Florida expects that the assets of the Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Fund will be sufficient to cover the contract price. On July 10, 2019, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC for approval of the agreement. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio has two reportable segments, EU&I and GU&I.
EU&I transmits and distributes electricity in portions of Ohio and generates, distributes and sells electricity in portions of Northern Kentucky. GU&I transports and sells natural gas in portions of Ohio and Northern Kentucky. Both reportable segments conduct operations primarily through Duke Energy Ohio and its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky. The remainder of Duke Energy Ohio's operations is presented as Other.
All Duke Energy Ohio assets and revenues from continuing operations are within the U.S.
Year Ended December 31, 2022
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,798 $716 $2,514 $ $ $2,514 
Interest expense$86 $43 $129 $ $ $129 
Depreciation and amortization221 103 324   324 
Income tax expense (benefit)24 (43)(19)(2) (21)
Segment income (loss)/Net income189 121 310 (8) 302 
Capital expenditures$488 $362 $850 $ $ $850 
Segment assets7,504 4,164 11,668 14 (176)11,506 
133

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS
Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,493 $544 $2,037 $— $— $2,037 
Interest expense$87 $24 $111 $— $— $111 
Depreciation and amortization217 90 307 — — 307 
Income tax expense (benefit)15 19 34 (4)— 30 
Segment income (loss)/Net Income141 78 219 (15)— 204 
Capital expenditures$486 $362 $848 $— $— $848 
Segment assets6,882 3,892 10,774 29 (29)10,774 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,405 $453 $1,858 $— $— $1,858 
Interest expense$85 $17 $102 $— $— $102 
Depreciation and amortization200 78 278 — — 278 
Income tax expense (benefit)19 26 45 (2)— 43 
Segment income (loss)162 96 258 (6)— 252 
Capital expenditures$548 $286 $834 $— $— $834 
Segment assets6,615 3,380 9,995 32 (2)10,025 
4. REGULATORY MATTERS
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants record regulatory assets and liabilities that result from the ratemaking process. See Note 1 for further information.
134

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy and Progress Energy. See separate tables below for balances by individual registrant.
Duke EnergyProgress Energy
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Regulatory Assets
AROs – coal ash$3,205 $3,408 $1,429 $1,399 
AROs – nuclear and other945 684 884 620 
Deferred fuel and purchased power3,866 1,253 2,060 718 
Accrued pension and OPEB2,336 2,017 759 725 
Storm cost securitized balance, net940 991 720 759 
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 881 937 
Debt fair value adjustment829 884  — 
Storm cost deferrals666 213 559 189 
Hedge costs deferrals378 348 128 137 
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses342 356 42 47 
Retired generation facilities316 357 243 265 
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA288 317 21 21 
Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI)283 311 111 130 
Customer connect project271 242 136 124 
Costs of removal regulatory asset221 107 221 107 
Vacation accrual222 221 43 42 
Incremental COVID-19 expenses210 87 78 28 
CEP deferral190 161  — 
Demand side management (DSM)/Energy efficiency (EE)189 235 188 230 
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts168 139  — 
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 157 165 
Nuclear deferral154 120 64 42 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs121 108  — 
COR settlement120 123 32 32 
Deferred coal ash handling system costs92 90 25 23 
Qualifying facility contract buyouts81 94 81 94 
Amounts due from customers57 85  — 
Propane caverns26 —  — 
Deferred severance charges21 54 7 18 
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104  — 
Other555 426 110 87 
Total regulatory assets18,130 14,637 8,979 6,939 
Less: current portion3,485 2,150 1,833 1,030 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$14,645 $12,487 $7,146 $5,909 
Regulatory Liabilities
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$6,462 $7,199 $2,192 $2,394 
Costs of removal5,151 6,150 2,269 2,955 
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053  — 
Hedge cost deferrals683 364 252 155 
Accrued pension and OPEB211 213  — 
DOE Settlement154 — 154 — 
Provision for rate refunds78 274 28 87 
Amounts to be refunded to customers45 —  — 
Other1,226 1,110 434 453 
Total regulatory liabilities15,048 17,363 5,329 6,044 
Less: current portion1,466 1,211 576 478 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$13,582 $16,152 $4,753 $5,566 
Descriptions of regulatory assets and liabilities summarized in the tables above and below follow. See tables below for recovery and amortization periods at the separate registrants.
AROs coal ash. Represents deferred depreciation and accretion related to the legal obligation to close ash basins. The costs are deferred until recovery treatment has been determined. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
135

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
AROs nuclear and other. Represents regulatory assets or liabilities, including deferred depreciation and accretion, related to legal obligations associated with the future retirement of property, plant and equipment, excluding amounts related to coal ash. The AROs relate primarily to decommissioning nuclear power facilities. The amounts also include certain deferred gains and losses on NDTF investments. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
Deferred fuel and purchased power. Represents certain energy-related costs that are recoverable or refundable as approved by the applicable regulatory body.
Accrued pension and OPEB. Accrued pension and OPEB represent regulatory assets and liabilities related to each of the Duke Energy Registrants’ respective shares of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service cost and credit attributable to Duke Energy’s pension plans and OPEB plans. The regulatory asset or liability is amortized with the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost and credit to net periodic benefit costs for pension and OPEB plans. The accrued pension and OPEB regulatory assets are expected to be recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Storm cost securitized balance, net. Represents the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego (2018 and 2019 events).
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net.Represents the balance associated with Crystal River Unit 3 retirement approved for recovery by the FPSC on September 15, 2015, and the upfront financing costs securitized in 2016 with issuance of the associated bonds. The regulatory asset balance is net of the AFUDC equity portion.
Debt fair value adjustment. Purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of Progress Energy and Piedmont at fair value in connection with the 2012 and 2016 mergers, respectively. Amount is amortized over the life of the related debt.
Storm cost deferrals. Represents deferred incremental costs incurred related to major weather-related events.
Hedge costs deferrals. Amounts relate to unrealized gains and losses on derivatives recorded as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively, until the contracts are settled.
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses. Represents deferred depreciation and operating expenses as well as carrying costs on the portion of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.
Retired generation facilities. Represents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA. Represents deferred costs incurred for the canceled Lee and Harris nuclear projects.
AMI. Represents deferred costs related to the installation of AMI meters and remaining net book value of non-AMI meters to be replaced at Duke Energy Carolinas, net book value of existing meters at Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Ohio and future recovery of net book value of electromechanical meters that have been replaced with AMI meters at Duke Energy Indiana.
Customer connect project. Represents incremental operating expenses and carrying costs on deferred amounts related to the deployment of the new customer information system.
Vacation accrual. Represents vacation entitlement, which is generally recovered in the following year.
Incremental COVID-19 expenses. Representsincremental costs related to ensuring continuity and quality of service in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CEP deferral. Represents deferred depreciation, PISCC and deferred property tax for Duke Energy Ohio Gas capital assets for the Capital Expenditure Program (CEP).
DSM/EE. Deferred costs related to various DSM and EE programs recoverable through various mechanisms.
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts. Represents costs for certain long-dated, fixed quantity forward natural gas supply contracts, which are recoverable through PGA clauses.
NCEMPA deferrals. Represents retail allocated cost deferrals and returns associated with the additional ownership interest in assets acquired from NCEMPA in 2015.
Nuclear deferral. Includes amounts related to levelizing nuclear plant outage costs, which allows for the recognition of nuclear outage expenses over the refueling cycle rather than when the outage occurs, resulting in the deferral of operations and maintenance costs associated with refueling.
Deferred pipeline integrity costs. Represents pipeline integrity management costs in compliance with federal regulations.
COR settlement. Represents approved COR settlements that are being amortized over the average remaining lives, at the time of approval, of the associated assets.
Deferred coal ash handling system costs. Represents deferred depreciation and returns associated with capital assets related to converting the ash handling system from wet to dry.
Qualifying facility contract buyouts. Represents termination payments for regulatory recovery through the capacity clause.
Amounts due from customers. Relates primarily to margin decoupling and IMR recovery mechanisms.
136

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Costs of removal regulatory asset. Represents the excess of spend over funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired, net of certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
Propane Caverns. Represents amounts for costs related to propane inventory, the net book value of remaining assets and decommissioning costs at Duke Energy Ohio.
MGP. Represents remediation costs incurred at former MGP sites and the deferral of costs to be incurred at Duke Energy Ohio's East End and West End sites.
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes. Amounts for all registrants include regulatory liabilities related primarily to impacts from the Tax Act. See Note 24 for additional information. Amounts have no immediate impact on rate base as regulatory assets are offset by deferred tax liabilities.
Costs of removal. Represents funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired. Also includes certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
DOE Settlement. Represents litigation settlement funds received resulting from the DOE’s failure to accept spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste from the Crystal River Unit 3 during 2014-2018 as required under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
Provision for rate refunds. Represents estimated amounts due to customers based on recording interim rates subject to refund.
RESTRICTIONS ON THE ABILITY OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES TO MAKE DIVIDENDS, ADVANCES AND LOANS TO DUKE ENERGY
As a condition to the approval of merger transactions, the NCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, KPSC and IURC imposed conditions on the ability of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont to transfer funds to Duke Energy through loans or advances, as well as restricted amounts available to pay dividends to Duke Energy. Certain subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Parent by obtaining approval of the respective state regulatory commissions. These conditions imposed restrictions on the ability of the public utility subsidiaries to pay cash dividends as discussed below.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also have restrictions imposed by their first mortgage bond indentures, which in certain circumstances, limit their ability to make cash dividends or distributions on common stock. Amounts restricted as a result of these provisions were not material at December 31, 2022.
Additionally, certain other subsidiaries of Duke Energy have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to Duke Energy due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, minimum working capital and tangible net worth requirements.
The restrictions discussed below were not a material amount of Duke Energy's and Progress Energy's net assets at December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Duke Energy Carolinas must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to mergers to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Progress
Duke Energy Progress must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the mergers between Duke Energy and Progress Energy and Duke Energy and Piedmont to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the respective mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without the prior authorization of the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio received FERC and PUCO approval to pay dividends from its equity accounts that are reflective of the amount that it would have in its retained earnings account had push-down accounting for the Cinergy merger not been applied to Duke Energy Ohio’s balance sheet. The conditions include a commitment from Duke Energy Ohio that equity, adjusted to remove the impacts of push-down accounting, will not fall below 30% of total capital.
Duke Energy Kentucky is required to pay dividends solely out of retained earnings and to maintain a minimum of 35% equity in its capital structure.
Duke Energy Indiana
Duke Energy Indiana must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the merger between Duke Energy and Cinergy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded. In addition, Duke Energy Indiana will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without prior authorization of the IURC.
Piedmont
Piedmont must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the acquisition of Piedmont by Duke Energy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
RATE-RELATED INFORMATION
The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, IURC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC approve rates for retail electric and natural gas services within their states. The FERC approves rates for electric sales to wholesale customers served under cost-based rates (excluding Ohio and Indiana), as well as sales of transmission service. The FERC also regulates certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects.
137

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress
Hurricane Ian
In late September and early October 2022, Hurricane Ian inflicted severe damage to the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress territories in North Carolina and South Carolina. Approximately 950,000 customers were impacted. Total estimated operation and maintenance expenses incurred for restoration efforts for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately $100 million, with an additional $9 million in capital investments. Approximately $83 million of the operation and maintenance expenses are deferred in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 ($40 million and $43 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have regulatory tools to recover storm costs including deferral and securitization. These estimates could change as Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress receive additional information on actual costs.
Carbon Plan Proceeding
On October 13, 2021, North Carolina enacted legislation (Energy Solutions for North Carolina or HB 951) that established a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance North Carolina CO2 emission reductions from electric generating facilities in the state through the use of least cost planning while providing for continued reliability and affordable rates for customers. Among other things, HB 951 directed that the NCUC approve an initial carbon plan (Carbon Plan) by December 31, 2022, taking all reasonable steps to achieve a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from public utilities’ electric generating facilities in the state by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and achieve carbon neutrality from electric generating facilities by 2050 while maintaining affordability and reliability for customers. On May 16, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed their proposed Carolinas Carbon Plan (Proposed Plan) with the NCUC.
The NCUC issued an order on December 30, 2022, adopting the first Carbon Plan. The order recognizes the value of an “all-of-the-above” approach to achieving CO2 emission reductions and established a set of near-term procurement and development activities needed to continue progress towards the targeted CO2 reductions, along with the schedule for the future biennial updates to the Carbon Plan. The approved near-term action plan includes procurement and development of solar, storage and hydrogen-capable natural gas generation at levels consistent with the Proposed Plan, along with upgrading key transmission facilities to strengthen the grid, improve resilience for customers and interconnect new solar generation and stakeholder engagement activities for onshore wind generation (in all cases, subject to any further applicable regulatory processes). The order also approved early development activities for long lead-time resources, including new nuclear, pumped-hydro storage and offshore wind transmission development. The NCUC affirmed the utility ownership structure required in HB 951; all new generation facilities or other resources selected by the NCUC to achieve the CO2 emission reductions shall be owned and recovered on a cost-of-service basis by the utilities, with a carveout for 45% of solar and solar plus storage generation to be procured through long-term purchase power agreements with third parties. The order approves continued utilization of the remaining coal-fired generation assets, ensuring that appropriate replacement generating units and associated transmission infrastructure are in service before existing generating units are retired and providing an orderly transition out of coal generation by 2035.
Storm Cost Securitization Legislation
On June 15, 2022, the South Carolina General Assembly unanimously adopted S. 1077 (Act 227) in both the House and Senate and the bill was signed into law on June 17, 2022. The legislation enables the PSCSC to permit the issuance of bonds for the payment of storm costs and the creation of a storm charge for repayment.
On August 5, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a petition with the PSCSC for review and approval of deferred storm costs to be securitized of approximately $223 million. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on or after March 1, 2023. On February 7, 2023, a stipulation was reached with all parties in the proceeding regarding certain items identified through the Office of Regulatory Staff (ORS) audit of storm costs. The final amount for securitization will depend on the outcome of the hearing.Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
138

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$1,391 $1,227 (g)(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(i)
1,614 339 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
614 365 Yes(h)
Storm cost securitized balance, net220 232 2041
Storm cost deferrals
93 22 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
228 171 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
30 31 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
39 54 Yes(b)
Deferred asset – Lee COLA267 296 (b)
AMI139 140 Yes(b)
Customer connect project62 66 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual84 83 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses127 51 Yes(b)
Nuclear deferral90 78 2024
COR settlement88 91 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs67 67 Yes(b)
Other235 166 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,388 3,479 
Less: current portion1,095 544 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,293 $2,935 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(d)
$2,475 $2,785 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
1,769 2,009 Yes(f)
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053 (b)
Hedge cost deferrals
350 209 (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
44 44 Yes(h)
Provision for rate refunds50 124 Yes(b)
Other587 461 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities6,313 7,685 
Less: current portion530 487 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$5,783 $7,198 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)     Included in rate base.
(d)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(i)    Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in May 2022 for recovery of $327 million, which included deferrals through January 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through August 2023. The next filing will be made in the first quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in July 2022 for recovery of $79 million, which included deferrals through May 2022. The amount is expected to be recovered through September 2023. The next filing will be made in the third quarter of 2023.
2023 North Carolina Rate Case
On January 19, 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The PBR Application includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $501 million in Year 1, $172 million in Year 2 and $150 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $823 million or 15.7% by early 2026. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Carolinas plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on September 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by January 1, 2024. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
139

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Oconee Nuclear Station Subsequent License Renewal
On June 7, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a subsequent license renewal (SLR) application for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to renew ONS’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The SLR would extend operations of the facility from 60 to 80 years. The current licenses for units 1 and 2 expire in 2033 and the license for unit 3 expires in 2034. By a Federal Register Notice dated July 28, 2021, the NRC provided a 60-day comment period for persons whose interest may be affected by the issuance of a subsequent renewed license for ONS to file a request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene. On September 27, 2021, Beyond Nuclear and Sierra Club (Petitioners) filed a Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene (Hearing Request) and a Petition for Waiver. The Hearing Request proposed three contentions and claimed that Duke Energy Carolinas did not satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, or the NRC’s NEPA-implementing regulations. Following Duke Energy Carolinas' answer and the Petitioners' reply, on February 11, 2022, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) issued its decision on the Hearing Request and found that the Petitioners failed to establish that the proposed contentions are litigable. The ASLB also denied the Petitioners' Petition for Waiver and terminated the proceeding.
On February 24, 2022, the NRC issued a decision in the SLR appeal related to Florida Power and Light's Turkey Point nuclear generating station in Florida. The NRC ruled that the NRC’s license renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) does not apply to SLR because the GEIS does not address SLR. The decision overturned a 2020 NRC decision that found the GEIS applies to SLR. Although Turkey Point is not owned or operated by a Duke Energy Registrant, the NRC’s order applies to all SLR applicants, including ONS. The NRC order also indicated no subsequent renewed licenses will be issued until the NRC staff has completed an adequate NEPA review for each application. On April 5, 2022, the NRC approved a 24-month rulemaking plan that will enable the NRC staff to complete an adequate NEPA review. Although an SLR applicant may wait until the rulemaking is completed, the NRC also noted that an applicant may submit a supplement to its environmental report providing information on environmental impacts during the SLR period prior to the rulemaking being completed. On November 7, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a supplement to its environmental report addressing environmental impacts during the SLR period. On December 19, 2022, the NRC published a notice in the Federal Register that the NRC will conduct a limited scoping process to gather additional information necessary to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental impacts at ONS during the SLR period. The NRC received comments from the EPA and the Petitioners and these comments identify eighteen potential impacts that should be considered by the NRC in the EIS, which include, but are not limited to, climate change and flooding, environmental justice, severe accidents, and external events. Currently, the NRC expects to publish a draft EIS in October 2023.
On December 19, 2022, the NRC issued the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the safety portion of the SLR application. The NRC determined Duke Energy Carolinas met the requirements of the applicable regulations and identified actions that have been taken or will be taken to manage the effects of aging and address time-limited analyses. Duke Energy Carolinas and the NRC met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) on February 2, 2023, to discuss issues regarding the SER and SLR application, after which the ACRS will issue a report discussing the result of its review.
Although the NRC’s GEIS applicability decision will delay completion of the SLR proceeding, Duke Energy Carolinas does not believe it changes the probability that the ONS subsequent renewed licenses will ultimately be issued, although Duke Energy Carolinas cannot guarantee the outcome of the license application process.
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. New depreciation rates were implemented for all of the nuclear facilities during the second quarter of 2021. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these additional relicensing proceedings.
140

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Progress
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$1,418 $1,389 (g)(b)
AROs – nuclear and other869 613 (c)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(l)
705 303 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(d)
417 351 Yes(j)
Storm cost securitized balance, net720 759 2041
Storm cost deferrals
234 170 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals
55 60 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses42 47 Yes2054
Retired generation facilities
149 171 Yes(b)
Deferred asset - Harris COLA21 21 (b)
AMI81 92 Yes(b)
Customer connect project
54 57 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual
43 42 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses78 28 Yes(b)
DSM/EE(d)
180 218 (h)(h)
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 (f)2042
Nuclear deferral64 42 2024
COR settlement32 32 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs25 23 Yes(b)
Other70 68 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,414 4,651 
Less: current portion690 533 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,724 $4,118 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(k)
$1,559 $1,695 (b)
Costs of removal(d)
2,269 2,955 Yes(i)
Hedge cost deferrals252 155 (b)
Provision for rate refunds28 87 Yes(b)
Other344 357 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities4,452 5,249 
Less: current portion332 381 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$4,120 $4,868 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Recovery period for costs related to nuclear facilities runs through the decommissioning period of each unit.
(d)    Included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    South Carolina retail allocated costs are earning a return.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(i)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(j)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(k)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(l)    Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in August 2022 for recovery of $251 million, which included deferrals through June 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through November 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in April 2022 for recovery of $44 million, which included deferrals through February 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through June 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023.
141

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2022 North Carolina Rate Case
On October 6, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The rate request before the NCUC includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $326 million in Year 1, $151 million in Year 2 and $138 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $615 million or 16% by late 2025. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Progress plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on June 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by October 1, 2023. The evidentiary hearing has been scheduled to begin on May 1, 2023. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On September 1, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the PSCSC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. On January 12, 2023, Duke Energy Progress and the ORS, as well as other consumer, environmental, and industrial intervening parties, filed a comprehensive Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement resolving all issues in the base rate proceeding. The major components of the stipulation include:
A $52 million annual customer rate increase prior to the reduction from the accelerated return to customers of federal unprotected Property, Plant and Equipment related EDIT. After extending the remaining EDIT giveback to customers to 33 months, the net annual retail rate increase is approximately $36 million.
ROE of 9.6% based upon a capital structure of 52.43% equity and 47.57% debt.
Continuation of deferral treatment of coal ash basin closure costs. Supports an amortization period for remaining coal ash closure costs in this rate case of seven years. Duke Energy Progress agreed not to seek recovery of approximately $50 million of deferred coal ash expenditures related to retired sites in this rate case (South Carolina retail allocation).
Accepts the 2021 Depreciation Study as proposed in this case, as adjusted for certain recommendations from ORS and includes accelerated retirement dates for certain coal units as originally proposed.
Establishment of a storm reserve to help offset the costs of major storms.
The PSCSC held a hearing on January 17, 2023, to consider evidence supporting the stipulation and unanimously voted to approve the comprehensive agreement on February 9, 2023. The PSCSC voted to allow Duke Energy Progress to implement new customer rates by April 1, 2023. A final written order is due from the PSCSC by March 1, 2023.
FERC Return on Equity Complaint
On October 16, 2020, North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC) filed a complaint at the FERC against Duke Energy Progress pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), alleging that the 11% stated ROE component in the demand formula rate in the Power Supply and Coordination Agreement between NCEMC and Duke Energy Progress is unjust and unreasonable. On June 16, 2022, Duke Energy Progress submitted to the FERC an Offer of Settlement and Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement) between NCEMC and Duke Energy Progress. The Settlement Agreement provides for an ROE of 10%, effective January 1, 2022, among other contract modifications. On November 7, 2022, the FERC approved the Settlement Agreement.
142

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Florida
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$11 $10 (b)
AROs – nuclear and other
15 (b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(h)
1,355 415 (f)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
342 374 Yes(g)
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 2036
Storm cost deferrals(c)
325 19 (f)(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
73 77 Yes2038
Retired generation facilities(c)
94 94 Yes2044
AMI(c)
30 38 Yes2032
Customer connect project(c)
82 67 Yes2037
Costs of removal regulatory asset(c)
221 107 (d)(b)
Qualifying facility contract buyouts(c)
81 94 Yes2034
Other55 49 (d)(b)
Total regulatory assets3,565 2,288 
Less: current portion1,143 497 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$2,422 $1,791 
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(c)
$633 $699 (b)
DOE Settlement154 — 
Other90 97 (d)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities877 796 
Less: current portion244 98 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$633 $698 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(e)    Earns a debt return/interest once collections begin.
(f)    Earns commercial paper rate.
(g)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(h)    Duke Energy Florida submitted a fuel filing to the FPSC in January 2023 for recovery of $795 million, which included the 2022 actual under-recovery of $1.2 billion, offset by projected declining fuel costs in 2023 due to lower natural gas prices. The expected recovery period is April 2023 through March 2024.
2021 Settlement Agreement
On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed a Settlement Agreement (the “2021 Settlement”) with the FPSC. The parties to the 2021 Settlement include Duke Energy Florida, the Office of Public Counsel (OPC), the Florida Industrial Power Users Group, White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. d/b/a PCS Phosphate and NUCOR Steel Florida, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”).
Pursuant to the 2021 Settlement, the Parties agreed to a base rate stay-out provision that expires year-end 2024; however, Duke Energy Florida is allowed an increase to its base rates of an incremental $67 million in 2022, $49 million in 2023 and $79 million in 2024, subject to adjustment in the event of tax reform during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023. The Parties also agreed to an ROE band of 8.85% to 10.85% with a midpoint of 9.85% based on a capital structure of 53% equity and 47% debt. The ROE band can be increased by 25 basis points if the average 30-year U.S. Treasury rate increases 50 basis points or more over a six-month period in which case the midpoint ROE would rise from 9.85% to 10.10%. On July 25, 2022, this provision was triggered. Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on August 12, 2022, to increase the ROE effective August 2022 with a base rate increase effective January 1, 2023. The FPSC approved this request on October 4, 2022. The 2021 Settlement Agreement also provided that Duke Energy Florida will be able to retain the $173 million retail portion of the expected DOE award from its lawsuit to recover spent nuclear fuel to mitigate customer rates over the term of the 2021 Settlement. In return, Duke Energy Florida is permitted to recognize the $173 million into earnings through the approved settlement period. The full amount of the $173 million is expected to be recognized between the years of 2023 and 2024, while also remaining within the approved ROE band. Duke Energy Florida settled the DOE lawsuit and received payment of approximately $180 million on June 15, 2022, of which the retail portion was approximately $154 million. The 2021 Settlement authorizes Duke Energy Florida to collect the difference between $173 million and the $154 million retail portion of the amount received through the capacity cost recovery clause.
143

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The 2021 Settlement also contained a provision to recover or flow-back the effects of tax law changes. As a result of the IRA enacted on August 16, 2022, Duke Energy Florida is eligible for PTCs associated with solar facilities placed in service beginning in January 2022. Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on October 17, 2022, to reduce base rates effective January 1, 2023, by $56 million to flow back the expected 2023 PTCs and to flow back the expected 2022 PTCs via an adjustment to the capacity cost recovery clause. On December 14, 2022, the FPSC issued an order approving Duke Energy Florida’s petition. See Note 24 for additional information on the IRA.
In addition to these terms, the 2021 Settlement contained provisions related to the accelerated depreciation of Crystal River Units 4-5, the approval of approximately $1 billion in future investments in new cost-effective solar power, the implementation of a new Electric Vehicle Charging Station Program and the deferral and recovery of costs in connection with the implementation of Duke Energy Florida’s Vision Florida program, which explores various emerging non-carbon emitting generation technology, distributed technologies and resiliency projects, among other things. The 2021 Settlement also resolved remaining unrecovered storm costs for Hurricane Michael and Hurricane Dorian.
The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021, issuing an order on June 4, 2021. Revised customer rates became effective January 1, 2022, with subsequent base rate increases effective January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024.
Clean Energy Connection
On July 1, 2020, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC for approval of a voluntary solar program. The program consists of 10 new solar generating facilities with combined capacity of approximately 750 MW. The program allows participants to support cost-effective solar development in Florida by paying a subscription fee based on per kilowatt subscriptions and receiving a credit on their bill based on the actual generation associated with their portion of the solar portfolio. The estimated cost of the 10 new solar generation facilities is approximately $1 billion and the projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2024. This investment will be included in base rates offset by the revenue from the subscription fees and the credits will be included for recovery in the fuel cost recovery clause. The FPSC approved the program in January 2021.
On February 24, 2021, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) filed a notice of appeal of the FPSC’s order approving the Clean Energy Connection to the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida heard the oral argument on February 9, 2022. On May 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Florida issued an order remanding the case back to the FPSC so that the FPSC can amend its order to better address some of the arguments raised by LULAC. On September 23, 2022, the FPSC issued a revised order and submitted it on September 26, 2022, to the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida requested that the parties file supplemental briefs regarding the revised order, which were filed February 6, 2023. The FPSC approval order remains in effect pending the outcome of the appeal. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Storm Protection Plan
On April 11, 2022, Duke Energy Florida filed a Storm Protection Plan for approval with the FPSC. The plan, which covers investments for the 2023-2032 time frame, reflects approximately $7 billion of capital investment in transmission and distribution meant to strengthen its infrastructure, reduce outage times associated with extreme weather events, reduce restoration costs and improve overall service reliability. The evidentiary hearing began on August 2, 2022. On October 4, 2022, the FPSC voted to approve Duke Energy Florida's plan with one modification to remove the transmission loop radially fed program, representing a reduction of approximately $80 million over the 10-year period starting in 2025. On December 9, 2022, the Office of Public Counsel filed a notice of appeal of this order to the Florida Supreme Court. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Hurricane Ian
On September 28, 2022, much of Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was impacted by Hurricane Ian, which caused significant damage resulting in more than 1.1 million outages. Duke Energy Florida's December 31, 2022 Consolidated Balance Sheets include an estimate of approximately $353 million related to deferred Hurricane Ian storm costs, consistent with the FPSC's storm rule, in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets. After depleting any existing storm reserves, which were approximately $107 million before Hurricane Ian, Duke Energy Florida is permitted to petition the FPSC for recovery of additional incremental operation and maintenance costs resulting from the storm and to replenish the retail customer storm reserve to approximately $132 million. Duke Energy Florida filed its petition for cost recovery of various storms, including Hurricane Ian, and replenishment of the storm reserve on January 23, 2023, seeking recovery of $442 million, for recovery over 12 months beginning with the first billing cycle in April 2023. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
144

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Ohio
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Ohio's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)2019
2018
 a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
     
AROs – coal ash$16
$20
 Yes(b)
Accrued pension and OPEB155
146
  (g)
Storm cost deferrals7
4
  2023
Deferred fuel and purchased power1
2
  2020
Hedge costs deferrals6
5
  (b)
DSM/EE2
10
 (f)(e)
AMI40
46
  (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
17
17
 Yes2083
Vacation accrual5
5
  2020
MGP102
99
  (b)
Deferred pipeline integrity costs17
14
 Yes(b)
East Bend deferrals44
47
 Yes(b)
Transmission expansion obligation40
43
  (e)
Grid modernization28
31
 Yes(b) (c)
Other118
75
  (b)
Total regulatory assets598
564
   
Less: current portion49
33
   
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$549
$531
   
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
     
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$654
$678
  (b)
Costs of removal86
126
  (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB16
18
  (g)
Other71
75
  (b)
Total regulatory liabilities827
897
   
Less: current portion64
57
   
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$763
$840
   
(a)Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)Included in rate base.
(d)Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
(e)Recovered via a rider mechanism.
(f)Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments.
(g)Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.

December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$ $33 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power54 38 2023
Accrued pension and OPEB129 133 (e)
Storm cost deferrals
14 2023
Hedge costs deferrals
2 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
15 16 Yes2083
AMI18 24 (b)
Customer connect project54 41 (b)
CEP deferral190 161 Yes(b)
Deferred pipeline integrity costs28 24 Yes(b)
Propane caverns26 — (b)
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104 (b)
Other154 126 (b)
Total regulatory assets684 707 
Less: current portion103 72 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$581 $635 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$496 $602 (b)
Costs of removal9 39 (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB21 21 (e)
Provision for rate refunds— 61 
Other107 78 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities633 801 
Less: current portion99 62 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$534 $739 
146


(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.

(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.

(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
(e)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.


2017 Electric Security Plan Filing
On June 1, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO a request for a standard service offer in the form of an Electric Security Plan (ESP). On February 15, 2018, the procedural schedule was suspended to facilitate ongoing settlement discussions. On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Motion to consolidate this proceeding with several other cases pending before the PUCO, including, but not limited to, its Electric Base Rate Case. Additionally, on April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio, along with certain intervenors, filed a Stipulation and Recommendation (Stipulation) with the PUCO resolving certain issues in this proceeding. The term of the ESP would be from June 1, 2018, to May 31, 2025, and included continuation of market-based customer rates through competitive procurement processes for generation, continuation and expansion of existing rider mechanisms and proposed new rider mechanisms relating to regulatory mandates, costs incurred to enhance the customer experience and transform the grid and a service reliability rider for vegetation management. The Stipulation established a regulatory model for the next seven years via the approval of the ESP and continued the current model for procuring supply for non-shopping customers, including recovery mechanisms. On December 19, 2018, the PUCO approved the Stipulation without material modification. Several parties, including the OCC, filed applications for rehearing. On February 6, 2019, the PUCO granted the parties rehearing. The PUCO issued its Second Entry on Rehearing on July 17, 2019, upholding its December 19, 2018, order and denying all assignments of error raised by the non-stipulating parties. On October 11, 2019, the OCC filed its Third Application for Rehearing arguing the PUCO erred in finding OCC’s Second Application for Rehearing as improper. Duke Energy Ohio filed its Memorandum Contra on October 21, 2019. The PUCO denied OCC's Third Application for Rehearing as a matter of law. On September 13, 2019, Interstate Gas Supply/Retail Supply Association filed appeals to the Ohio Supreme Court claiming the PUCO’s order was in error because it approved unsupported charges to competitive suppliers and cost subsidies shopping customers pay for non-shopping customers. On September 16, 2019, the OCC filed an appeal challenging the PUCO’s approval of OVEC recovery through Rider PSR alleging the FPA pre-empts the commission’s jurisdiction and that the record does not support finding that Rider PSR results in a limitation on shopping. Appellant briefs were filed on January 6, 2020. Appellee briefs will be due March 16, 2020. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Electric Base Rate Case
Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO an electric distribution base rate case application andon October 1, 2021, with supporting testimony filed on October 15, 2021, requesting an increase in Marchelectric distribution base rates of approximately $55 million and an ROE of 10.3%. This is an approximate 3.3% average increase in the customer's total bill across all customer classes. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Ohio's last electric distribution base rate case in 2017. Duke Energy Ohio requestedis also seeking to adjust the caps on its Distribution Capital Investment Rider (DCI Rider). The Staff of the PUCO (Staff) report was issued on May 19, 2022, recommending an estimated annual increase in electric distribution base rates of approximately$2 million to $15 million and a return on equitywith an ROE range of 10.4%. The application also included requests8.84% to continue certain current riders and establish new riders.9.85%. On September 26, 2017, the PUCO staff filed a report recommending a revenue decrease between approximately $18 million and $29 million and a return on equity between 9.22% and 10.24%. On April 13, 2018,19, 2022, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Motion to consolidate this proceeding with several other cases pending before the PUCO. On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio, along with certain intervenors, filed the Stipulation and Recommendation with the PUCO, resolving numerous issues including thosewhich includes an increase in thisoverall electric distribution base rate proceeding. Major componentsrates of the Stipulation relatedapproximately $23 million and an ROE of 9.5%. The stipulation is among all but one party to the base distribution rate case included a $19 million decrease in annual base distribution revenue with a returnproceeding. The PUCO issued an order on equity unchanged from the current rate of 9.84% based upon a capital structure of 50.75% equity and 49.25% debt. Upon approval of new rates, Duke Energy Ohio's rider for recovering its initial SmartGrid implementation ended as these costs would be recovered through base rates. The Stipulation also renewedDecember 14, existing riders, some of which were included in the company's ESP, and added two new riders including the Enhanced Service Reliability Rider to recover vegetation management costs not included in base rates, up to $10 million per year (operation and maintenance only) and the PowerForward Rider to recover costs incurred to enhance the customer experience and further transform the grid (operation and maintenance and capital). In addition to the changes in revenue attributable to the Stipulation, Duke Energy Ohio’s capital-related riders, including the Distribution Capital Investments Rider, began to reflect the lower federal income tax rate associated with the Tax Act with updates to customers’ bills beginning April 1, 2018. This change reduced electric revenue by approximately $20 million on an annualized basis. On December 19, 2018, the PUCO approved2022, approving the Stipulation without material modification. New base rates were implemented effectiveRates went into effect on January 2, 2019. Several parties including the OCC3, 2023. The Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) filed applicationsan application for rehearing.rehearing on January 13, 2023. On February 6, 2019,8, 2023, the PUCOCommission granted the parties rehearing. The PUCO issued its Second Entry on Rehearing on July 17, 2019, upholding its December 19, 2018, order and denying all assignments of error raised by the non-stipulating parties. On October 11, 2019, the OCC filed its Third ApplicationOCC's application for Rehearing arguing the PUCO erred in finding OCC’s Second Applicationrehearing for Rehearing as improper. Duke Energy Ohio filed its Memorandum Contra on October 21, 2019. The PUCO denied OCC's Third Application for Rehearing as a matter of law. On September 13, 2019, Interstate Gas Supply/Retail Supply Association filed appeals to the Ohio Supreme Court claiming the PUCO’s order was in error because it approved unsupported charges to competitive suppliers and cost subsidies shopping customers pay for non-shopping customers. On September 16, 2019, the OCC filed an appeal challenging the PUCO’s approval of OVEC recovery through Rider PSR alleging the FPA pre-empts the commission’s jurisdiction and that the record does not support finding that Rider PSR results in a limitation on shopping. Appellant briefs were filed on January 6, 2020. Appellee briefs will be due March 16, 2020. further consideration.Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Ohio Valley Electric Corporation
On March 31, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed for approval to adjust its existing Rider PSR to pass through net costs related to its contractual entitlement to capacity and energy from the generating assets owned by OVEC. Duke Energy Ohio sought deferral authority for net costs incurred from April 1, 2017, until the new rates under Rider PSR were put into effect. On April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Motion to consolidate this proceeding with several other cases currently pending before the PUCO. Also, on April 13, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio, along with certain intervenors, filed a Stipulation with the PUCO resolving numerous issues including those related to Rider PSR. The Stipulation activated Rider PSR for recovery of net costs incurred from January 1, 2018, through May 2025. On December 19, 2018, the PUCO approved the Stipulation without material modification. The PSR rider became effective April 1, 2019. Several parties, including the OCC, filed applications for rehearing. On February 6, 2019, the PUCO granted the parties rehearing. The PUCO issued its Second Entry on Rehearing on July 17, 2019, upholding its December 19, 2018, order and denying all assignments of error raised by the non-stipulating parties. On October 11, 2019, the OCC filed its Third Application for Rehearing arguing the PUCO erred in finding OCC’s Second Application for Rehearing as improper. Duke Energy Ohio filed its Memorandum Contra on October 21, 2019. The PUCO denied OCC's Third Application for Rehearing as a matter of law. On September 13, 2019, Interstate Gas Supply/Retail Supply Association filed appeals to the Ohio Supreme Court claiming the PUCO’s order was in error because it approved unsupported charges to competitive suppliers and cost subsidies shopping customers pay for non-shopping customers. On September 16, 2019, the OCC filed an appeal challenging the PUCO’s approval of OVEC recovery through Rider PSR alleging the FPA pre-empts the commission’s jurisdiction and that the record does not support finding that Rider PSR results in a limitation on shopping. Appellant briefs were filed on January 6, 2020. Appellee briefs will be due March 16, 2020. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

147
145




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


On July 23, 2019, an Ohio bill was signed into law that became effective January 1, 2020. Among other things, the bill allows for recovery of prudently incurred costs, net of any revenues, for Ohio investor-owned utilities that are participants under the OVEC power agreement. The recovery shall be through a non-bypassable rider that is to replace any existing recovery mechanism approved by the PUCO and will remain in place through 2030. The amounts recoverable from customers will be subject to an annual cap, with incremental costs that exceed such cap eligible for deferral and recovery subject to review. See Note 18 for additional discussion of Duke Energy Ohio's ownership interest in OVEC.
Tax Act – Ohio
On July 25, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for electric distribution customers. The new rider will flow through to customers the benefit of the lower statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, all future benefits of the lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in prior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a 10-year period. Duke Energy Ohio's transmission rates reflect lower federal income tax but guidance from FERC on amortization of both protected and unprotected transmission-related EDITs is still pending. On October 24, 2018, the PUCO issued a Finding and Order that, among other things, directed all utilities over which the commission has ratemaking authority to file an application to pass the benefits of the Tax Act to customers by January 1, 2019, unless otherwise exempted or directed by the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio's July 25, 2018, filing for electric distribution operations is consistent with the commission's October 24, 2018, Finding and Order and no further action is needed. On February 20, 2019, the PUCO approved the application without material modification. Rates became effective March 1, 2019.
On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to change its base rates and establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for natural gas customers. Duke Energy Ohio requested commission approval to implement the changes and rider effective April 1, 2019. The new rider will flow through to customers the benefit of the lower statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, all future benefits of the lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in prior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a 10-year period. The PUCO established a procedural schedule and testimony was filed on July 31, 2019. An evidentiary hearing occurred on August 7, 2019. Initial briefs were filed on September 11, 2019. Reply briefs were filed on September 25, 2019. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery
In response to changes in Ohio law that eliminated Ohio's energy efficiency mandates, the PUCO issued an order on February 26, 2020, directing utilities to wind down their demand-side management programs by September 30, 2020, and to terminate the programs by December 31, 2020. Duke Energy Ohio took the following actions:
On March 28, 2014,27, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for recovery of program costs, lost distribution revenuerehearing seeking clarification on the final true up and performance incentives related to its energy efficiency and peak demand reduction programs. These programs are undertaken to comply with environmental mandates set forth in Ohio law. The PUCO approved Duke Energy Ohio’s application but found that Duke Energy Ohio was not permitted to use banked energy savings from previous years in order to calculate the amount of allowed incentive. This conclusion represented a change to the cost recovery mechanism that had been agreed upon by intervenors and approved by the PUCO in previous cases. The PUCO granted the applications for rehearing filed by Duke Energy Ohio and an intervenor.reconciliation process after 2020. On January 6, 2016, Duke Energy Ohio and the PUCO Staff entered into a stipulation, pending the PUCO's approval, to resolve issues related to performance incentives and the PUCO Staff audit of 2013 costs, among other issues. In December 2015, based upon the stipulation, Duke Energy Ohio re-established approximately $20 million of the revenues that had been previously reversed. On October 26, 2016,November 18, 2020, the PUCO issued an order approvingreplacing the stipulation without modification. Incost cap previously imposed upon Duke Energy Ohio with a cap on shared savings recovery. On December 2016, the PUCO granted the intervenors request18, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an additional application for rehearing challenging, among other things, the imposition of the cap on shared savings. On January 13, 2021, the application for the purpose ofrehearing was granted for further review. consideration.
On April 10, 2019, the PUCO issued an Entry on Rehearing denying the rehearing applications.
On June 15, 2016,October 9, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for approval ofto implement a three-yearvoluntary energy efficiency and peak demand reductionprogram portfolio to commence on January 1, 2021. The application proposed a mechanism for recovery of programs. A stipulation and modified stipulation were filed on December 22, 2016, and January 27, 2017, respectively. Under the terms of the stipulations, which included support for deferral authority of allprogram costs and a cap on shared savings incentives, Duke Energy Ohio has offered its energy efficiencybenefit associated with avoided transmission and peak demand reduction programs throughout 2017. distribution costs. This application remains under review.
On February 3, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed for deferral authority of its costs incurred in 2017 in respect of its proposed energy efficiency and peak demand reduction portfolio. On September 27, 2017,November 18, 2020, the PUCO issued an order approvingdirecting all utilities to set their energy efficiency riders to zero effective January 1, 2021, and to file a modified stipulation. The modifications impose an annual capseparate application for final reconciliation of approximately $38 millionall energy efficiency costs prior to December 31, 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, Duke Energy Ohio suspended its energy efficiency programs.
On June 14, 2021, the PUCO requested each utility to file by July 15, 2021, a proposal to reestablish low-income programs through December 31, 2021. Duke Energy Ohio filed its application on program costsJuly 14, 2021.
On February 23, 2022, the PUCO issued its Fifth Entry on Rehearing that 1) affirmed its reduction in Duke Energy Ohio's shared savings cap; 2) denied rehearing/clarification regarding lost distribution revenues and shared savings incentives combined, but allowedrecovery for periods after December 31, 2020; and 3) directed Duke Energy Ohio to file for a waiver of costs in excess of the cap in 2017. The PUCO approved the waiver request for 2017 up to a total cost of $56 million. submit an updated application with exhibits.
On November 21, 2017, the PUCO granted Duke Energy Ohio's and intervenor's applications for rehearing of the September 27, 2017, order. On January 10, 2018, the PUCO denied the OCC's application for rehearing of the PUCO order granting Duke Energy Ohio's waiver request; however, a decision on Duke Energy Ohio's application for rehearing remains pending. On October 15, 2019, the Ohio Supreme Court issued an Opinion regarding a similar cap on energy efficiency imposed by the PUCO on Ohio Edison Company finding the PUCO lacked statutory authority to impose a cap on cost recovery. On December 9, 2019, and in response to recent changes to Ohio Law, the OCC filed a motion to eliminate shared savings from Duke Energy Ohio’s energy efficiency calculation beginning in 2020.March 25, 2022, Duke Energy Ohio filed a memorandum contra and a notice of additional authority on December 16, 2019, arguing OCC’s interpretation is incorrect and thatits Amended Application consistent with the commission should amend its September 27, 2017 order to comply with recent precedent. PUCO's order.
Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2014 Electric Security Plan
On May 30, 2018, the PUCO approved an extension of Duke Energy Ohio’s then-current ESP, including all terms and conditions thereof, excluding an extension of Duke Energy Ohio’s Distribution Capital Investment Rider. Following rehearing, on July 25, 2018, the PUCO granted the request and allowed a continuing cap on recovery under Rider DCI. The orders were upheld on rehearing requested by the Ohio Manufacturers' Association (OMA) and OCC. The time period for parties to file for rehearing or appeal has expired.Natural Gas Base Rate Case
In 2018, the OMA and OCC filed separate appeals of PUCO's approval of Duke Energy Ohio’s ESP with the Ohio Supreme Court, challenging PUCO's approval of Duke Energy Ohio’s Rider PSR as a placeholder and its Rider DCI to recover incremental revenue requirement for distribution capital since Duke Energy Ohio’s last base rate case. The Ohio Supreme Court issued an order on March 13, 2019, for the appellants to show cause why the appeals should not be dismissed as moot in light of the commission’s approval of Duke Energy Ohio’s current ESP. The OCC and OMA made the requested filings on March 20, 2019, and Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO a natural gas base rate case application on June 30, 2022, with supporting testimony filed on July 14, 2022, requesting an increase in natural gas base rates of approximately $49 million and an ROE of 10.3%. This is an approximate 5.6% average increase in the customer's total bill across all customer classes. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Ohio's last natural gas base rate case in 2012. Duke Energy Ohio is also seeking to adjust the caps on its responseCapital Expenditure Program Rider (CEP Rider). The Staff of the PUCO (Staff) report was issued on December 21, 2022, recommending an increase in natural gas base rates of $24 million to $36 million, with an equity ratio of 52% and an ROE range of 9.03% to 10.04%. A procedural schedule was issued on December 22, 2022, scheduling the evidentiary hearing to commence on March 27, 2019. Subsequent to OCC and OMA making28, 2023. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the requested filings, the Ohio Supreme Court dismissed the appeals as moot on May 8, 2019.

148




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


outcome of this matter.
Natural Gas Pipeline Extension
Duke Energy Ohio is proposing to installinstalled a new natural gas pipeline (the Central Corridor Project) in its Ohio service territory to increase system reliability and enable the retirement of older infrastructure. Duke Energy Ohio currently estimates the pipeline development costs and construction activities will range from $163 million to $245 million in direct costs (excluding overheads and AFUDC). On January 20, 2017, Duke Energy Ohio filed an amended application with the Ohio Power Siting Board (OPSB) for approval of one of two proposed routes. A public hearing was held on June 15, 2017. In April 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed a motion with OPSB to establish a procedural schedule and filed supplemental information supporting its application. On December 18, 2018, the OPSB established a procedural schedule that included a local public hearing on March 21, 2019. An evidentiary hearing began on April 9, 2019, and concluded on April 11, 2019. Briefs were filed on May 13, 2019, and reply briefs were filed on June 10, 2019. On November 21, 2019, the OPSB approved Duke Energy Ohio's application subject to 41 conditions on construction. Applications for rehearing were filed by several stakeholders on December 23, 2019, arguing that the OPSB approval was incorrect. Duke Energy Ohio filed a memorandum contra on January 2, 2020. On January 17, 2020, the OPSB granted rehearing for the purpose of further consideration. Construction of the pipeline extension is expected to bewas completed before the 2021/and placed in service on March 14, 2022, winter season. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcomewith a total cost of this matter.approximately $170 million (excluding overheads and AFUDC).
2012 Natural Gas Rate Case/MGP Cost Recovery
As part of its 2012 natural gas base rate case,In an order issued in 2013, the PUCO approved Duke Energy Ohio has approval to deferOhio's deferral and recoverrecovery of costs related to environmental remediation at two sites (East End and West End) that housed former MGP operations. Duke Energy Ohio has made annual applications for recovery of these deferred costs. Duke Energy Ohio has collected approximately $55 million in environmental remediation costs between 2009 through 2012 through a separate rider, Rider MGP, which is currently suspended. Duke Energy Ohio has made annual applications with the PUCO to recover its incremental remediation costs consistent with the PUCO’s directive in Duke Energy Ohio’s 2012 natural gas base rate case. To date,
A Stipulation and Recommendation was filed jointly by Duke Energy Ohio, the Staff, the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Ohio Energy Group on August 31, 2021, which was approved without modification by the PUCO has not ruled on Duke Energy Ohio’s annual applications for the calendar years 2013 through 2017. On September 28, 2018, the staff of the PUCO issued a report recommending a disallowance of approximately $12 million of the $26 million inApril 20, 2022. The Stipulation and Recommendation resolved all open issues regarding MGP remediation costs incurred between 2013 through 2017 that staff believes are not eligibleand 2019, Duke Energy Ohio’s request for recovery. Staff interpretsadditional deferral authority beyond 2019 and the PUCO’s 2012 Order grantingpending issues related to the Tax Act described below as it related to Duke Energy Ohio’s natural gas operations. As a result of the approval of the Stipulation and Recommendation, Duke Energy Ohio recoveryrecognized pretax charges of approximately $15 million to Operating revenues, regulated natural gas and $58 million to Operation, maintenance and other and a tax benefit of $72 million to Income Tax (Benefit) Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Stipulation and Recommendation further acknowledged Duke Energy Ohio’s ability to file a request for additional deferral authority in the future related to environmental remediation of any MGP remediation as limitingimpacts in the recoveryOhio River, if necessary, subject to work directlyspecific conditions. On June 15, 2022, the PUCO granted the rehearing requests of Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. (IGS) and The Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA), which were filed on May 20, 2022, for further consideration. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the East End and West End sites. outcome of this matter.
146

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Tax Act – Ohio
On October 30,December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed reply comments objecting to the staff’s recommendations and explaining, among other things, the obligation Duke Energy Ohio has under Ohio law to remediate all areas impacted by the former MGPs and not just physical property that housed the former plants and equipment. To date, the PUCO has not ruled on Duke Energy Ohio’s applications. On March 29, 2019, Duke Energy Ohio filed its annualan application to recover incremental remediation expensechange its base rate tariffs and establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for natural gas customers. The new rider would flow through to customers the calendar yearbenefit of the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, seeking recoveryall future benefits of approximately $20 millionthe lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in remediation costs. On July 12, 2019, the staff recommendedprior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules would be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a disallowance of approximately $11 million for work that staff believes occurred in areas not authorized for recovery. Additionally, staff recommended that any discussion pertaining to Duke Energy Ohio's recovery of ongoing MGP costs should be directly tied to or netted against insurance proceeds collected by Duke Energy Ohio.10-year period. An evidentiary hearing beganoccurred on November 18, 2019,August 7, 2019. The Stipulation and concluded November 21, 2019. Initial briefs wereRecommendation filed on August 31, 2021, and approved on April 20, 2022, disclosed in the MGP Cost Recovery matter above, resolves the outstanding issues in this proceeding by providing customers a one-time bill credit for the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 17, 2020,1, 2018, through June 1, 2022, and reply briefsreducing base rates going forward. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law through a new rider. Deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules were filed on February 14, 2020. written off. The commission granted the rehearing requests of IGS and RESA for further consideration. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
The 2012 PUCO order also contained conditional deadlines for completing the MGP environmental investigation and remediation costs at the MGP sites. Subsequent to the order, the deadline was extended to December 31, 2019. On May 10, 2019, Midwest Propane Caverns
Duke Energy Ohio filed an application requestingused propane stored in caverns to meet peak demand during winter for several decades. Once the Central Corridor Project was complete and placed in service, the propane peaking facilities were no longer necessary and were retired. On October 7, 2021, Duke Energy Ohio requested deferral treatment of the property, plant and equipment as well as costs related to propane inventory and decommissioning costs. On January 6, 2022, the Staff issued a continuation of its existingreport recommending deferral authority for MGP remediationcosts related to propane inventory and investigation that must occur after December 31, 2019. On September 13, 2019, intervenor comments were filed opposing Duke Energy Ohio's requestdecommissioning costs, but not for continuationthe net book value of existing deferral authority and on October 2, 2019, Duke Energy Ohio filed reply comments. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Duke Energy Kentucky Natural Gas Base Rate Case
On August 31, 2018, Duke Energy Kentucky filed an application with the KPSC requesting an increase in natural gas base rates of approximately $11 million, an approximate 11.1% average increase across all customer classes. The increase was net of approximately $5 million in annual savings asremaining plant assets. As a result of the Tax Act. The drivers for this case were capital invested sinceStaff's report, Duke Energy Kentucky’s last rate case in 2009.Ohio recorded a $19 million charge to Impairment of assets and other charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2021. A Stipulation and Recommendation was filed jointly by Duke Energy Kentucky also sought implementationOhio and the Staff on April 27, 2022, recommending, among other things, approval of deferral treatment of a Weather Normalization Adjustment Mechanism, amortization of regulatory assets and to implement the impactsportion of the Tax Act, prospectively. On January 30, 2019, Duke Energy Kentucky entered into a settlement agreement withnet book value of the Attorney Generalproperty, plant and equipment prior to the 2021 impairment at the time of Kentucky, the only intervenor in the case. The settlement provided for an approximate $7 million increase innext natural gas base revenue,rate case, excluding operations and maintenance savings, decommissioning costs not to exceed $7 million and costs related to propane inventory. The Stipulation and Recommendation states that Duke Energy Ohio will seek recovery of the deferral through its next natural gas base rate case proceeding with a proposed amortization period of at least 10 years and include an independent engineering study analyzing the necessity and prudency of the incremental investments made at the facilities since March 31, 2012. Duke Energy Ohio will not seek a return on equity of 9.7% and approval of the proposed Weather Normalization Mechanism. Adeferred amounts. An evidentiary hearing was held on FebruarySeptember 8, 2022. On October 5, 2019. The commission2022, the PUCO issued itsan order approving the settlement without material modificationStipulation and Recommendation as filed. As a result of the order, Duke Energy Ohio recorded a reversal of $12 million to Impairment of assets and other charges on March 27, 2019. Revised customer rates were effective April 1, 2019.the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Kentucky Electric Base Rate Case
On September 3, 2019,December 1, 2022, Duke Energy Kentucky filed a rate case with the KPSC requesting an annualized increase in electric base rates of approximately $46$75 million which representsand an approximate 12.5%ROE of 10.35%. This is an overall increase across all customer classes.in rates of approximately 17.8%. The request for rate increase is driven by increased investment in utility plant sincecapital investments to strengthen the last electric base rate case in 2017. Duke Energy Kentucky seekselectricity generation and delivery systems along with adjusted depreciation rates for the East Bend and Woodsdale generation stations to implement a Storm Deferral Mechanism that will enable Duke Energy Kentucky to defer actual costs incurred for major storms that are over or under amounts in base rates. In response to large customers’ desire to have access to renewable resources,support the energy transition. Duke Energy Kentucky is proposingalso requesting new programs and tariff updates, including a Green Source Advantage tariff designed for those large customers that wish to invest involuntary community-based renewable energy resources to meet sustainability goals. Duke Energy Kentucky is proposing an electric vehicle (EV) infrastructure pilotsubscription program and modest incentives to assist customers in investing intwo EV technologies. Additionally, Duke Energy Kentucky is proposing to build an approximate 3.4 MW distribution battery energy storage system to be attached to Duke Energy Kentucky’s distribution system providing frequency regulation and enhanced reliability to Kentucky customers. The commission issued acharging programs. A procedural schedule with two rounds of discovery and opportunitieswas issued on December 19, 2022, scheduling the evidentiary hearing for intervenor and rebuttal testimony. The Kentucky Attorney General filed its testimony recommending an increase of approximately $26 million. On January 31, 2020, Duke Energy Kentucky filed rebuttal testimony updating its rate increase calculationsMay 9, 2023. New rates are anticipated to approximately $44 million. Hearings began on February 19, 2020. Duke Energy Kentucky anticipates that rates will go into effect in the second quarter of 2020.around July 15, 2023. Duke Energy Kentucky cannot predict the outcome of this matter.

147
149




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


Regional Transmission Organization Realignment
Duke Energy Ohio, including Duke Energy Kentucky, transferred control of its transmission assets from MISO to PJM, effective December 31, 2011. The PUCO approved a settlement related to Duke Energy Ohio’s recovery of certain costs of the RTO realignment via a non-bypassable rider. Duke Energy Ohio is allowed to recover all MISO Transmission Expansion Planning (MTEP) costs directly or indirectly charged to Ohio customers. The KPSC also approved a request to effect the RTO realignment, subject to a commitment not to seek double recovery in a future rate case of the transmission expansion fees that may be charged by MISO and PJM in the same period or overlapping periods.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balance of Duke Energy Ohio’s recorded liability for its exit obligation and share of MTEP costs recorded in Other within Current Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The retail portions of MTEP costs billed by MISO are recovered by Duke Energy Ohio through a non-bypassable rider. As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, $40 million and $43 million, respectively, are recorded in Regulatory assets on Duke Energy Ohio's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
   Provisions/
 Cash
  
(in millions)December 31, 2018
 Adjustments
 Reductions
 December 31, 2019
Duke Energy Ohio$58
 $
 $(4) $54

Duke Energy Indiana
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Indiana's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, Earns/PaysRecovery/RefundDecember 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)2019
2018
 a ReturnPeriod Ends(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
  
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$529
$450
 (b)AROs – coal ash$385 $749 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased powerDeferred fuel and purchased power138 158 2023
Accrued pension and OPEB243
222
 (f)Accrued pension and OPEB214 222 (e)
Deferred fuel and purchased power
40
 2020
Hedge costs deferrals23
24
 (b)
Hedge costs deferrals
20 35 (b)
DSM/EE
14
 (e)
AMI(c)
18
18
 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
255 262 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
49
57
 Yes2026
Retired generation facilities(c)
34 38 Yes2030
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
246
233
 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual12
11
 2020
AMIAMI15 17 2031
Customer connect projectCustomer connect project19 11 (b)
Other52
88
 (b)Other44 63 (b)
Total regulatory assets1,172
1,157
 Total regulatory assets1,124 1,555 
Less: current portion90
175
 Less: current portion249 277 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$1,082
$982
 Total noncurrent regulatory assets$875 $1,278 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
  
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$1,008
$1,009
 (b)Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$840 $908 (b)
Costs of removal599
628
 (d)Costs of removal531 575 (d)
Hedge cost deferralsHedge cost deferrals81 — (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB90
67
 (f)Accrued pension and OPEB104 113 (e)
Amounts to be refunded to customers
1
 2020
Other43
42
 (b)Other85 96 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,740
1,747
 Total regulatory liabilities1,641 1,692 
Less: current portion55
25
 Less: current portion187 127 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,685
$1,722
 Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,454 $1,565 
(a)Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)Included in rate base.
(d)Refunded over the life of the associated assets.
(e)Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through a tracker mechanism over a two-year period.
(f)
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Refunded over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.

150




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


2019 Indiana Rate Case
On July 2, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC its first general rate case in Indiana in 16 years, for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $395 million. The request for rate increase is driven by strategic investments to generate cleaner electricity, improve reliability and serve a growing customer base. The request is premised upon a Duke Energy Indiana rate base of $10.2 billion as of December 31, 2018, and adjusted for projected changes through December 31, 2020. On September 9, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana revised its revenue request from $395 million to $393 million and filed updated testimony for the Retail Rate Case. The updated filing reflects a clarification in the presentation of Utility Receipts Tax, a $2 million reduction in the revenue requirement for revenues that will remain in riders and changes to allocation of revenue requirements within rate classes. The Utility Receipts Tax is currently embedded in base rates and rider rates. The proposed treatment is to include the Utility Receipts Tax as a line item on the customer bill rather than included in rates. The request is an approximate 15% increase in retail revenues and approximately 17% when including estimated Utility Receipts Tax. The rebuttal case, filed on December 4, 2019, updated the requested revenue requirement to result in a 15.6% or $396 million average retail rate increase, including the impacts of the Utility Receipts Tax. The commission determined to take two issues out ofutility receipts tax. On June 29, 2020, the IURC issued an order in the rate case approving a revenue increase of $146 million before certain adjustments and place themratemaking refinements. The order approved Duke Energy Indiana's requested forecasted rate base of $10.2 billion as of December 31, 2020, including the Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Plant. The IURC reduced Duke Energy Indiana's request by slightly more than $200 million, when accounting for the utility receipts tax and other adjustments. Approximately 50% of the reduction was due to a prospective change in separate subdocket proceedingsdepreciation and use of regulatory asset for the end-of-life inventory at retired generating plants, approximately 20% was due to the complexityapproved ROE of 9.7% versus the requested ROE of 10.4% and approximately 20% was related to miscellaneous earnings neutral adjustments. Step one rates were estimated to be approximately 75% of the total and became effective on July 30, 2020. Step two rates estimated to be the remaining 25% of the total rate case.increase were approved on July 28, 2021, and implemented in August 2021.
Several groups appealed the IURC order to the Indiana Court of Appeals. The commission movedIndiana Court of Appeals affirmed the IURC decision on May 13, 2021. However, upon appeal by the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and the Duke Industrial Group on March 10, 2022, the Indiana Supreme Court found that the IURC erred in allowing Duke Energy Indiana to recover coal ash costs incurred before the IURC’s rate case order in June 2020. The Indiana Supreme Court found that allowing Duke Energy Indiana to recover coal ash costs incurred between rate cases that exceeded the amount built into base rates violated the prohibition against retroactive ratemaking. The IURC’s order has been remanded to the IURC for additional proceedings consistent with the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion. As a result of the court's opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized pretax charges of approximately $211 million to Impairment of assets and other charges and $46 million to Operating revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana filed a request for electric transportation pilot and future coal ash recovery issues to separate subdockets. Coal ash expenditures prior to 2019 are still includedrehearing with the Supreme Court on April 11, 2022, which the court denied on May 26, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana filed its testimony in the rate case. Hearings concludedremand proceeding on February 7, 2020 and rates are expectedAugust 18, 2022. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled to be effective by mid-2020.begin March 3, 2023. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of these matters.this matter.
Edwardsport IGCC Plant
148

On September 20, 2018,
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2020 Indiana Coal Ash Recovery Case
In Duke Energy Indiana’s 2019 rate case, the IURC also opened a subdocket for post-2018 coal ash related expenditures. Duke Energy Indiana filed testimony on April 15, 2020, in the coal ash subdocket requesting recovery for the post-2018 coal ash basin closure costs for plans that have been approved by the Indiana OfficeDepartment of Utility Consumer Counselor,Environmental Management (IDEM) as well as continuing deferral, with carrying costs, on the Duke Industrial Group and Nucor Steel – Indiana entered into a settlement agreement to resolve IGCC ratemaking issues for calendar years 2018 and 2019. The agreement will remain in effect until new rates are established in Duke Energy Indiana's next base rate case, which was filed on July 2, 2019, with rates to be effective in mid-2020.balance. An evidentiary hearing was held in December 2018, and on June 5, 2019,September 14, 2020. Briefing was completed by mid-September 2021. On November 3, 2021, the IURC issued an order approvingallowing recovery for post-2018 coal ash basin closure costs for the 2018 Settlement Agreement.plans that have been approved by IDEM, as well as continuing deferral, with carrying costs, on the balance. The OUCC and the Duke Industrial Group appealed. The Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion on February 21, 2023, reversing the IURC's order to the extent that it allowed Duke Energy Indiana to recover federally mandated costs incurred prior to the IURC's November 3, 2021 order. In addition, the court found that any costs incurred pre-petition to determine federally mandated compliance options were not specifically authorized by the statute and should also be disallowed. Duke Energy Indiana is assessing its appellate options and must file a petition to transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court by April 7, 2023. As a result of the court's opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized a pretax charge of approximately $175 million to Impairment of assets and other charges for the year ended December 31, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
TDSIC 2.0
On November 23, 2021, Duke Energy Indiana filed for approval of the Transmission, Distribution, Storage Improvement Charge 2.0 investment plan for 2023-2028 (TDSIC 2.0). On June 15, 2022, the IURC approved, without modification, TDSIC 2.0, which includes approximately $2 billion in transmission and distribution investments selected to improve customer reliability, harden and improve resiliency of the grid, enable expansion of renewable and distributed energy projects and encourage economic development. In addition, the IURC set up a subdocket to consider the targeted economic development project, which the IURC approved on March 2, 2022. On July 15, 2022, the OUCC filed a notice of appeal to the Indiana Court of Appeals in Duke Energy Indiana’s TDSIC 2.0 proceeding. An appellant brief was filed on October 28, 2022, and Duke Energy Indiana filed its responsive brief on December 28, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Piedmont
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Piedmont's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)2019
2018
 a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
     
AROs – nuclear and other16
19
  (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
90
99
 Yes(f)
Vacation accrual12
12
   
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts(e)
117
141
   
Deferred pipeline integrity costs(c)
62
51
 Yes(b)
Amounts due from customers36
24
 Yes(b)
Other30
11
  (b)
Total regulatory assets363
357
   
Less: current portion73
54
   
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$290
$303
   
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
     
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$555
$579
  (b)
Costs of removal574
564
  (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
3
1
 Yes(f)
Amounts to be refunded to customers34
33
 Yes(b)
Other46
41
  (b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,212
1,218
   
Less: current portion81
37
   
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,131
$1,181
   
(a)Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)Included in rate base.
(d)Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
(e)Balance will fluctuate with changes in the market. Current contracts extend into 2031.
(f)Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.

December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – nuclear and other$27 $22 (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
119 82 (g)
Vacation accrual12 12 2023
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts(f)
168 139 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs(c)
93 84 2025
Amounts due from customers57 85 (e)(b)
Other35 33 (b)
Total regulatory assets511 457 
Less: current portion119 141 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$392 $316 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$459 $510 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
573 572 (d)
Other66 32 (e)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,098 1,114 
Less: current portion74 56 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,024 $1,058 
151


(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.

(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.

(c)    Included in rate base.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


North Carolina Integrity Management Rider Filing
On April 30, 2019, Piedmont filed a petition under the IMR mechanism to update rates, based on the eligible capital investments closed to integrity and safety projects(d)    Recovery over the six-month period ending March 31, 2019. The NCUC approved the petition on May 29, 2019, and rates became effective June 1, 2019. The effectlife of the update was an increase to annual revenues of approximately $9 million. These revenues, alongassociated assets.
(e)    Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(f)    Balance will fluctuate with eligible spending forchanges in the three months ended June 30, 2019, were subsequently included in base rates effective November 1, 2019, as part of the 2019 North Carolina Rate Case.market. Current contracts extend into 2031.
On October 31, 2019, Piedmont filed a petition under the IMR mechanism to update rates, based on the eligible capital investments closed to integrity and safety projects(g)    Recovered primarily over the three-month period ending September 30, 2019. The NCUC approvedaverage remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the petition on December 3, 2019, and rates became effective December 1, 2019. The effect of the update was an increase to annual revenues of approximately $11 million.benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Tennessee Integrity Management Rider Filing
In November 2019, Piedmont filed a petition with the TPUC under the IMR mechanism to collect an additional $4 million in annual revenues, effective January 2020, based on the eligible capital spending on integrity and safety projects over the 12-month period ending October 31, 2019. A procedural schedule has not yet been set for this matter. Piedmont cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2019 North2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On April 1, 2019,2022, Piedmont filed an application with the NCUC, its first general rate case in North Carolina in six years,PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $83$7 million, which represents an approximate 9%3.4% increase in retail revenues. The request for rate increaseAn evidentiary hearing was driven by significant infrastructure upgrade investments (plant additions) sinceheld on August 15, 2022. On September 15, 2022, the last general rate case through June 30, 2019, offset by savings that customers will begin receiving due to federal and state tax reform. Approximately half of the plant additions being included in rate base are categories of plant investment not covered under the IMR mechanism, which was originally approved as part of the 2013 North Carolina Rate Case.
On August 13, 2019, Piedmont, the Public Staff, and two groups representing industrial customers filed an Agreement and Stipulation Settlement resolving issues in the base rate proceeding,PSCSC delivered its decision, which included a return on equityan ROE of 9.7%9.3% and a capital structure of 52%52.2% equity and 48% debt.47.8% debt and issued its final order on October 6, 2022. Revised customer rates became effective in October 2022 and resulted in a rate decrease for retail customers of approximately $1 million.
149

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Tennessee Annual Review Mechanism
On October 10, 2022, the TPUC approved Piedmont’s petition to adopt an Annual Review Mechanism (ARM) as allowed by Tennessee law. Under the ARM, Piedmont will adjust rates annually to achieve its allowed 9.80% ROE over the upcoming year and to true up any variance between its allowed ROE and actual ROE from the prior calendar year. The North Carolina Attorney General's Office did not support the settlement. Other major components of the Stipulation included:
An annual increase in revenues of $109 million before consideration of riders associated with federal and state tax reform;
A decrease through a rider mechanism of $23 million perinitial year to return unprotected federal EDIT over a five-year period and deferred revenues relatedsubject to the federal rate reduction of $37 million to be returned over one year;
A decrease through a rider mechanism of $21 million per year related to reductions in the North Carolina state income tax rate to be returned over a three-year period;
An overall cap on net revenue increase of $83 million. This will impact Piedmont beginning November 1,true up is 2022, only if the company does not file another general rate case in the interim;
Continuation of the IMR mechanism; and
Establishment of a new deferral mechanism for certain Distribution Integrity Management Program (DIMP) operations and maintenance expenses incurred effective November 1, 2019, and thereafter.
An evidentiary hearing began on August 19, 2019. On October 31, 2019, the NCUC approved the Stipulation and the revised customerinitial rate adjustments request will be filed in May 2023 for rates were effective NovemberOctober 1, 2019.2023.
OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
On September 2, 2014, Duke Energy, Dominion Energy, Inc. (Dominion), Piedmont and Southern Company Gas announced the formation of Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC (ACP) to build and own the proposed Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP pipeline), was planned to be an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline running from West Virginia to North Carolina. The ACP pipeline is designed to meet, in part, the needs identified by Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont. Dominion will be responsible for building and operating the ACP pipeline and holds a leading ownership percentage in ACP of 48%. Duke Energyindirectly owns a 47% interest, which is accounted for as an equity method investment through its Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment. Southern Company Gas maintains
As a 5% interest. See Notes 13 and 18 for additional information related to Duke Energy's ownership interest. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont, among others, will be customersresult of the pipeline. Purchases will be made under several 20-year supply contracts, subject to state regulatory approval.
In 2018,uncertainty created by various legal rulings, the FERC issued a series of Notices to Proceed, which authorizedpotential impact on the cost and schedule for the project, to begin certain construction-related activities along the pipeline route, including supply header and compressors. On May 11, 2018, and October 19, 2018, FERC issued Notices to Proceed allowing full construction activities in all areas of West Virginia except in the Monongahela National Forest. On July 24, 2018, FERC issued a Notice to Proceed allowing full construction activities along the project route in North Carolina. On October 19, 2018, the conditions to effectiveness of the Virginia 401 water quality certification were satisfied and, following receipt of the Virginia 401 certification, ACP filed a request for FERC to issue a Notice to Proceed with full construction activities in Virginia. Due to legal challenges not directly related to the request for a Notice to Proceed in Virginia, this request is still pending.

152




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


ACP is the subject of challenges in state and federal courts and agencies, including, among others, challenges of the project’s biological opinion (BiOp) and incidental take statement (ITS), crossings of the Blue Ridge Parkway, the Appalachian Trail, and the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests, the project’s U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE) 404 permit, the project's air permit for a compressor station at Buckingham, Virginia, the FERC Environmental Impact Statement order and the FERC order approving the Certificate of Public Convenience and Necessity. Each of these challenges alleges non-compliance on the part of federal and state permitting authorities and adverse ecological consequences if the project is permitted to proceed. Since December 2018, notable developments in these challenges include a stay in December 2018 issued by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit) and the same court's July 26, 2019, vacatur of the project's BiOp and ITS (which stay and subsequent vacatur halted most project construction activity), a Fourth Circuit decision vacating the project's permits to cross the Monongahela and George Washington National Forests and the Appalachian Trail, the Fourth Circuit's remand to USACE of ACP's Huntington District 404 verification, the Fourth Circuit’s remand to the National Park Service of ACP’s Blue Ridge Parkway right-of-way and the most recent vacatur of the air permit for a compressor station at Buckingham, Virginia. ACP is vigorously defending these challenges and coordinating with the federal and state authorities which are the direct parties to the challenges. The Solicitor General of the United States and ACP filed petitions for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States on June 25, 2019, regarding the Appalachian Trail crossing and certiorari was granted on October 4, 2019. The Supreme Court hearing is scheduled for February 24, 2020, and a ruling is expected in the second quarter of 2020. ACP is also evaluating possible legislative and other remedies to this issue.
In anticipation of the Fourth Circuit's vacatur of the BiOp and ITS, ACP and the FWS commenced work in mid-May of 2019 to set the basis for a reissued BiOp and ITS. On February 10, 2020, FERC issued a letter to FWS requesting the re-initiation of formal consultation in support of reissuing the BiOp and ITS. ACP continues coordinating and working with FWS and other parties in preparation for a reissuance of the BiOp and ITS.
ACP triggered the Adverse Government Actions (AGA) clause of its agreements with its customers in December 2019. Formal negotiations have commenced regarding pricing and construction timing, among other items, and are expected to be finalized in the first quarter of 2020. The results of these negotiations will directly impact the expected future cash flows of this project.
Given theongoing legal challenges and ongoing discussions with customers, ACP expects mechanical completionthe risk of additional legal challenges and delays through the full project in late 2021 with in-service likelyconstruction period and Dominion’s decision to sell substantially all of its gas transmission and storage segment assets, Duke Energy's Board of Directors and management decided that it was not prudent to continue to invest in the first half of 2022.
The delays resulting from the legal challenges described above have also impacted the cost for the project. Project cost is approximately $8 billion, excluding financing costs. This estimate is based on the current facts available around construction costs and timelines, and is subject to future changes as those facts develop. Abnormal weather, work delays (including delays due to judicial or regulatory action) and other conditions may result in cost or schedule modifications, a suspension of AFUDC for ACP and/or impairment charges potentially material to Duke Energy's cash flows, financial position and results of operations.
Duke Energy’s investment in ACP was $1.2 billion at December 31, 2019.On July 5, 2020, Duke Energy evaluated this investment for impairment at December 31, 2019, and determined that fair value approximated carrying value and therefore no impairment was necessary. Duke Energy also has a guarantee agreement supporting its shareDominion announced the cancellation of the ACP revolving credit facility. Duke Energy’s maximum exposure to loss under the termspipeline project.
As part of the guarantee is $827 million, which represents 47%pretax charges to earnings of approximately $2.1 billion recorded for the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility as ofyear ended December 31, 2019. See Note 13 for additional information.
Constitution Pipeline Company, LLC
Duke Energy owned a 24% ownership interest in Constitution, which is accounted for as an equity method investment. Constitution was a natural gas pipeline project slated to transport natural gas supplies from the Marcellus supply region in northern Pennsylvania to major northeastern markets. The pipeline was to be constructed and operated by Williams Partners L.P., which had a 41% ownership share. The remaining interest was held by Cabot Oil and Gas Corporation and WGL Holdings, Inc. In December 2014, Constitution received approval from the FERC to construct and operate the proposed pipeline. However, since April 2016, Constitution had stopped construction and discontinued capitalization of future development costs due to permitting delays and adverse rulings by regulatory agencies and courts.
In late 2019, Constitution determined that its principal shipper would not agree to an amended precedent agreement. Without such an amendment, the project would no longer be viable and, as of February 5, 2020, the Constitution partners formally resolved to initiate the dissolution of Constitution, and to terminate the Constitution Pipeline project. In the fourth quarter of 2019, Duke Energy recorded an OTTI of $25 million related to Constitution within Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates on the Duke Energy'sEnergy Consolidated Statements of Income, resultingOperations, Duke Energy established liabilities related to the cancellation of the ACP pipeline project. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. At December 31, 2022, there is $59 million and $47 million within Other Current Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, in the full write-down ofGas Utilities and Infrastructure segment. The liabilities represent Duke Energy's investment in Constitution. obligation of approximately $106 million to satisfy remaining ARO requirements to restore construction sites.
See Notes 8 and 13 and 18 for additionaladditional information related to ownership interest and carrying value of the investment.regarding this transaction.
Potential Coal Plant Retirements
The Subsidiary Registrants periodically file IRPs with their state regulatory commissions. The IRPs provide a view of forecasted energy needs over a long term (10 to 20 years) and options being considered to meet those needs. IRPs filed by the Subsidiary Registrants included planning assumptions to potentially retire certain coal-fired generating facilities in North Carolina and Indiana earlier than their current estimated useful lives. lives. The NCUC concluded in its Carbon Plan order that the projected retirements dates presented by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress in their Carbon Plan for coal-fired generating facilities were reasonable for planning purposes and further directed that appropriate steps be taken to optimally retire the coal fleet according to such schedule. Duke Energy continues to evaluate the potential need to retire these coal-fired generating facilities earlier than the current estimated useful lives and plans to seek regulatory recovery for amounts that would not be otherwise recovered when any of these assets are retired.

153




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS


The table below contains the net carrying value of generating facilities planned for retirement or included in recent IRPs or Carbon Plan as evaluated for potential retirement. Dollar amounts in the table below are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and exclude capitalized asset retirement costs.
   Remaining Net
 Capacity
 Book Value
 (in MW)
 (in millions)
Duke Energy Carolinas   
Allen Steam Station Units 1-3(a)
585
 $152
Duke Energy Indiana   
Gallagher Units 2 and 4(b)
280
 114
Gibson Units 1-5(c)
3,132
 1,697
Cayuga Units 1-2(c)
1,005
 974
Total Duke Energy$5,002
 $2,937
Remaining Net
CapacityBook Value
(in MW)(in millions)
Duke Energy Carolinas
Allen Steam Station Unit 1(a)
167 $10 
Allen Steam Station Unit 5(b)
259 233 
Cliffside Unit 5(b)
546 344 
Marshall Units 1-2(b)
760428
Duke Energy Progress
Mayo Unit 1(b)
713 639 
Roxboro Units 3-4(b)
1,409 425 
Duke Energy Florida
Crystal River Units 4-5(c)
1,442 1,549 
Duke Energy Indiana
Gibson Units 1-5(d)
2,845 2,043 
Cayuga Units 1-2(d)
1,005 622 
Total Duke Energy9,146 $6,293 
(a)Duke Energy Carolinas will retire Allen Steam Station Units 1 through 3 by December 31, 2024, as part of the resolution of a lawsuit involving alleged New Source Review violations.
(b)Duke Energy Indiana committed to either retire or stop burning coal at Gallagher Units 2 and 4 by December 31, 2022, as part of the 2016 settlement of Edwardsport IGCC matters.
(c)On July 1, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed its 2018 IRP with the IURC. The 2018 IRP included scenarios evaluating the potential retirement of coal-fired generating units at Gibson and Cayuga. The rate case filed July 2, 2019, includes proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates from 2026 to 2038.
(a)    As part of the 2015 resolution of a lawsuit involving alleged New Source Review violations, Duke Energy continues to evaluateCarolinas must retire Allen Steam Station Unit 1 by December 31, 2024.
(b)    These units were included in the potential need to retire generating facilities earlier than the current estimated useful lives, and plans to seek regulatory recovery, as necessary, for amounts that would not be otherwise recovered when any of these assets are retired. However, such recovery, including recovery of carrying costs on remaining book values, could be subject to future approvals and therefore cannot be assured.
IRP filed by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress are evaluatingin South Carolina on September 1, 2020, and in the potentialCarbon Plan adopted by the NCUC in December 2022. The long-term energy options considered could result in retirement of these units earlier than their current estimated useful lives.
150

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
(c)    On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed the 2021 Settlement agreement with the FPSC, which proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates for Duke Energy Florida's last two coal-fired generating unit retirements with afacilities, Crystal River Units 4-5, eight years ahead of schedule in 2034 rather than in 2042. The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021. The remaining net carryingbook value reflected in the table above excludes $200 million of approximately $721 million and $1.2 billion, respectively, included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019.
Referaccelerated deprecation collected from retail customers pursuant to the "Western Carolinas Modernization Plan" discussion above for details of Duke Energy Progress' planned retirements.Florida's 2017 Settlement.
(d)    The rate case filed July 2, 2019, included proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates from 2026 to 2038. The depreciation rates reflecting these updated retirement dates were approved by the IURC as part of the rate case order issued on June 29, 2020.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
INSURANCE
General Insurance
The Duke Energy Registrants have insurance and reinsurance coverage either directly or through indemnification from Duke Energy’s captive insurance company, Bison, and its affiliates, consistent with companies engaged in similar commercial operations with similar type properties. The Duke Energy Registrants’ coverage includes (i) commercial general liability coverage for liabilities arising to third parties for bodily injury and property damage; (ii) workers’ compensation; (iii) automobile liability coverage; and (iv) property coverage for all real and personal property damage. Real and personal property damage coverage excludes electric transmission and distribution lines, but includes damages arising from boiler and machinery breakdowns, earthquakes, flood damage and extra expense, but not outage or replacement power coverage. All coverage is subject to certain deductibles or retentions, sublimits, exclusions, terms and conditions common for companies with similar types of operations. The Duke Energy Registrants self-insure their electric transmission and distribution lines against loss due to storm damage and other natural disasters. As discussed further in Note 4, Duke Energy Florida maintains a storm damage reserve and has a regulatory mechanism to recover the cost of named storms on an expedited basis.
The cost of the Duke Energy Registrants’ coverage can fluctuate from year to year reflecting claims history and conditions of the insurance and reinsurance markets.
In the event of a loss, terms and amounts of insurance and reinsurance available might not be adequate to cover claims and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered by other sources, could have a material effect on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Each company is responsible to the extent losses may be excluded or exceed limits of the coverage available.
Nuclear Insurance
Duke Energy Carolinas owns and operates McGuire and Oconee and operates and has a partial ownership interest in Catawba. McGuire and Catawba each have 2two reactors. Oconee has 3three reactors. The other joint owners of Catawba reimburse Duke Energy Carolinas for certain expenses associated with nuclear insurance per the Catawba joint owner agreements.
Duke Energy Progress owns and operates Robinson, Brunswick and Harris. Robinson and Harris each have 1one reactor. Brunswick has 2two reactors.
Duke Energy Florida owns Crystal River Unit 3, which permanently ceased operation in 2013 and reachedachieved a SAFSTOR condition in January 2018 after the successful transfer of all used nuclear fuel assembliesJuly 2019. On October 1, 2020, Crystal River Unit 3 changed decommissioning strategies from SAFSTOR to an on-site dry cask storage facility.

154




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


DECON.
In the event of a loss, terms and amounts of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered by other sources, could have a material effect on Duke Energy Carolinas’, Duke Energy Progress’ and Duke Energy Florida’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Each company is responsible to the extent losses may be excluded or exceed limits of the coverage available.
Nuclear Liability Coverage
The Price-Anderson Act requires owners of nuclear reactors to provide for public nuclear liability protection per nuclear incident up to a maximum total financial protection liability. The maximum total financial protection liability, which is approximately $13.9$13.7 billion, is subject to change every five years for inflation and for the number of licensed reactors. Total nuclear liability coverage consists of a combination of private primary nuclear liability insurance coverage and a mandatory industry risk-sharing program to provide for excess nuclear liability coverage above the maximum reasonably available private primary coverage. The U.S. Congress could impose revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry to pay claims.
Primary Liability Insurance
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have purchased the maximum reasonably available private primary nuclear liability insurance as required by law, which is $450 million per station. Duke Energy Florida has purchased $100 million primary nuclear liability insurance for Crystal River in compliance with the law.
Excess Liability Program
This program provides $13.5$13.2 billion of coverage per incident through the Price-Anderson Act’s mandatory industrywide excess secondary financial protection program of risk pooling. This amount is the product of potential cumulative retrospective premium assessments of $138 million times the current 9896 licensed commercial nuclear reactors in the U.S. Under this program, operating unit licensees could be assessed retrospective premiums to compensate for public nuclear liability damages in the event of a nuclear incident at any licensed facility in the U.S. Retrospective premiums may be assessed at a rate not to exceed $20.5 million per year per licensed reactor for each incident. The assessment may be subject to state premium taxes.
151

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Property and Accidental Outage Coverage
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are members of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), an industry mutual insurance company, which provides property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning insurance for each station for losses resulting from damage to its nuclear plants, either due to accidents or acts of terrorism. Additionally, NEIL provides accidental outage coverage for losses in the event of a major accidental outage at an insured nuclear station.
Pursuant to regulations of the NRC, each company’s property damage insurance policies provide that all proceeds from such insurance be applied, first, to place the plant in a safe and stable condition after a qualifying accident and second, to decontaminate the plant before any proceeds can be used for decommissioning, plant repair or restoration.
Losses resulting from acts of terrorism are covered as common occurrences, such that if terrorist acts occur against one or more commercial nuclear power plants insured by NEIL within a 12-month period, they would be treated as one event and the owners of the plants where the act occurred would share one full limit of liability. The full limit of liability is currently $3.2 billion. NEIL sublimits the total aggregate for all of their policies for non-nuclear terrorist events to approximately $1.8 billion.
Each nuclear facility has accident property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning liability insurance from NEIL with limits of $1.5 billion, except for Crystal River Unit 3. Crystal River Unit 3’s limit is $50 million and is on an actual cash value basis. All nuclear facilities except for Catawba and Crystal River Unit 3 also share an additional $1.25 billion nuclear accident insurance limit above their dedicated underlying limit. This shared additional excess limit is not subject to reinstatement in the event of a loss. Catawba has a dedicated $1.25 billion of additional nuclear accident insurance limit above its dedicated underlying limit. Catawba and Oconee also have an additional $750 million of non-nuclear accident property damage limit. All coverages are subject to sublimits and significant deductibles.
NEIL’s Accidental Outage policy provides some coverage, similar to business interruption, for losses in the event of a major accident property damage outage of a nuclear unit. Coverage is provided on a weekly limit basis after a significant waiting period deductible and at 100% of the applicable weekly limits for 52 weeks and 80% of the applicable weekly limits for up to the next 110 weeks. Coverage is provided until these applicable weekly periods are met, where the accidental outage policy limit will not exceed $490 million for Catawba, McGuire, and Catawba, $462 million forHarris, Brunswick, and Harris, $406 million for Oconee and $364 million for Robinson. NEIL sublimits the accidental outage recovery up to the first 104 weeks of coverage not to exceed $328 million from non-nuclear accidental property damage. Coverage amounts decrease in the event more than one unit at a station is out of service due to a common accident. All coverages are subject to sublimits and significant deductibles.
Potential Retroactive Premium Assessments
In the event of NEIL losses, NEIL’s board of directors may assess member companies' retroactive premiums of amounts up to 10 times their annual premiums for up to six years after a loss. NEIL has never exercised this assessment. The maximum aggregate annual retrospective premium obligations for Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are $155$151 million, $94$93 million and $1 million, respectively. Duke Energy Carolinas' maximum assessment amount includes 100% of potential obligations to NEIL for jointly owned reactors. Duke Energy Carolinas would seek reimbursement from the joint owners for their portion of these assessment amounts.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and local lawsregulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, coal ash and other environmental matters. These lawsregulations can be changed from time to time, imposing new obligations on the Duke Energy Registrants. The following environmental matters impact all of the Duke Energy Registrants.

155




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Remediation Activities
In addition to the AROAROs recorded as a result of various environmental regulations, discussed in Note 10, the Duke Energy Registrants are responsible for environmental remediation at various sites. These include certain properties that are part of ongoing operations and sites formerly owned or used by Duke Energy entities. These sites are in various stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring. Managed in conjunction with relevant federal, state and local agencies, remediation activities vary based upon site conditions and location, remediation requirements, complexity and sharing of responsibility. If remediation activities involve joint and several liability provisions, strict liability, or cost recovery or contribution actions, the Duke Energy Registrants could potentially be held responsible for environmental impacts caused by other potentially responsible parties and may also benefit from insurance policies or contractual indemnities that cover some or all cleanup costs. Liabilities are recorded when losses become probable and are reasonably estimable. The total costs that may be incurred cannot be estimated because the extent of environmental impact, allocation among potentially responsible parties, remediation alternatives and/or regulatory decisions have not yet been determined at all sites. Additional costs associated with remediation activities are likely to be incurred in the future and could be significant. Costs are typically expensed as Operation, maintenance and other in the Consolidated Statements of Operations unless regulatory recovery of the costs is deemed probable.
152

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The following tables containtable contains information regarding reserves for probable and estimable costs related to the various environmental sites. These reserves are recorded in Accounts payable within Current Liabilities and Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
Piedmont
Balance at December 31, 2016$98
 $10
 $18
 $3
 $14
 $59
 $10
$1
Provisions/adjustments8
 3
 3
 2
 2
 3
 (4)1
Cash reductions(25) (3) (6) (2) (4) (15) (1)
Balance at December 31, 201781
 10
 15
 3
 12
 47
 5
2
Provisions/adjustments26
 3
 2
 3
 (2) 21
 1
1
Cash reductions(30) (2) (6) (2) (4) (20) (1)(1)
Balance at December 31, 201877
 11
 11
 4
 6
 48
 5
2
Provisions/adjustments33
 6
 9
 2
 5
 11
 
7
Cash reductions(52) (6) (4) (2) (2) (40) (1)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2019$58
 $11
 $16
 $4
 $9
 $19
 $4
$8

(in millions)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Reserves for Environmental Remediation
Duke Energy$84 $88 
Duke Energy Carolinas22 19 
Progress Energy19 23 
Duke Energy Progress8 11 
Duke Energy Florida11 11 
Duke Energy Ohio33 34 
Duke Energy Indiana3 
Piedmont7 
Additional losses in excess of recorded reserves that could be incurred for the stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring for environmental sites that have been evaluated at this time are not material except as presented in the table below.
(in millions) 
Duke Energy$59
Duke Energy Carolinas11
Duke Energy Ohio42
Piedmont2

material.
LITIGATION
Duke Energy Carolinas and
Michael Johnson et al. v. Duke Energy ProgressCorporation et al.
NCDEQ ClosureOn September 23, 2020, plaintiff Michael Johnson, a former Duke Energy employee and participant in the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan (Plan) brought suit on his own behalf and on behalf of other participants and beneficiaries similarly situated against Duke Energy Corporation, the Duke Energy Benefits Committee, and other unnamed individual defendants. The complaint, which was subsequently amended to add a current participant as a plaintiff on November 23, 2020, alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties with respect to certain fees associated with the Plan in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and seeks certification of a class of all individuals who were participants or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time on or after September 23, 2014. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint on December 18, 2020. On January 31, 2022, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. On February 28, 2022, Duke Energy responded to the amended complaint. Discovery commenced and the parties exchanged preliminary disclosures. After review of these disclosures, the plaintiffs agreed to voluntarily dismiss the suit and the parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice on April 29, 2022, ending this litigation.
Texas Storm Uri Tort Litigation
The Coal Ash Act requires CCR surface impoundments in North Carolina to be closed, with the closure method and timing based on a risk ranking classification determined by legislation or state regulators. The NCDEQ previously classified the impoundments at Allen, Belews Creek, Rogers, Marshall, Mayo and Roxboro as low risk. The Coal Ash Act allowed a range of closure options for low risk rated basins. On April 1, 2019, NCDEQ issued a closure determination (NCDEQ's April 1 Order) requiring Duke Energy Carolinas Corporation and several Duke Energy Progress to excavate all remaining coal ash impoundments at these facilities. On April 26, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed Petitions for Contested Case Hearingsrenewables project companies in the OfficeERCOT market were named in more than thirty lawsuits arising out of Administrative Hearings to challenge NCDEQ's April 1 Order. On May 9, 2019, NCDEQ issued a supplemental order requiring that closure plans be submitted on December 31, 2019, but providing that the corrective action plans are not due until March 31, 2020. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed amended petitions on May 24, 2019, incorporating the May 9, 2019, order.
On December 31, 2019, the parties executed a settlement agreement resolving the closure method for each of these sites. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress agreed to excavate 7 of the 9 remaining coal ash basins at these sites with ash moved to on-site lined landfills, including 2 at Allen, 1 at Belews Creek, 1 at Mayo, 1 at Roxboro, and 2 at Rogers. At the 2 remaining basins at Marshall and Roxboro, uncapped basin ash will be excavated and moved to lined landfills. Those portions of the basins at Marshall and Roxboro,Texas Storm Uri, which were previously filled with ash and on which permitted facilities were constructed, will not be disturbed and will be closed pursuant to other state regulations. On February 5, 2020, the North Carolina Superior court entered a consent order, after which this litigation was dismissed on February 11, 2020.

156




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Coal Ash Insurance Coverage Litigation
In March 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed a civil actionoccurred in the North Carolina Superior Court against various insurance providers. The lawsuit seeks payment for coal ash-related liabilities covered by third-party liability insurance policies. The insurance policies were issued between 1971 and 1986 and provide third-party liability insurance for property damage. The civil action seeks damages for breach of contract and indemnification for costs arising from the Coal Ash Act and the EPA CCR rule at 15 coal-fired plants in North Carolina and South Carolina. Despite a stay of the litigation from May 2019 through September 2019 to allow the parties to discuss potential resolution, no resolution was reached, and litigation resumed. In February and March 2020, the Court will hear arguments on numerous cross motions filed by the parties to seek legal determinations concerning, among other issues, the appropriate insurance allocation methods, the trigger of the applicable coverages and several coverage defenses raised by the insurance providers. Trial is scheduled for February 2021. Duke Energy CarolinasCorporation was dismissed from the suits, leaving two suits in which individual wind and solar projects are named. These lawsuits seek recovery for property damages, personal injury and wrongful death allegedly caused by the power outages that plaintiffs claim were the collective failure of generators, transmission and distribution utilities ("TDUs"), retail energy providers, natural gas providers, co-ops and municipalities that generate power and ERCOT, all of which were originally sued by all plaintiffs. The cases were consolidated into a Texas state court multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceeding for discovery and pre-trial motions. Five cases were designated for motions to dismiss and all other cases were stayed. On January 28, 2023, the Court denied the generators' and TDUs' motions to dismiss the negligence claims but dismissed the tortious interference and conspiracy claims. The motions to dismiss ERCOT and the natural gas defendants were also granted. The generator and TDU defendants filed a petition for mandamus in each of the five cases seeking to overturn the denials on February 10, 2023. If the Texas Court of Appeals accepts the appeals, it will set a briefing schedule. The remaining cases that are part of the MDL are currently stayed, except that plaintiffs have been given leave to amend their pleadings. Plaintiffs began amending existing lawsuits and filing new lawsuits on behalf of hundreds of plaintiffs against hundreds of defendants, including in some cases, by again naming Duke Energy ProgressCorporation and naming, for the first time, Duke Energy Renewables, LLC. Plaintiffs have also re-named ERCOT as a defendant. As new cases are served, they are being brought into the MDL and are subject to the stay in the MDL proceeding. Duke Energy cannot predict the outcomes of these matters. See Note 2 for more information related to the sale of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Ruben Villano, et al. v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
On June 16, 2021, a group of nine individuals went over a low head dam adjacent to the Dan River Steam Station in Eden, North Carolina, while water tubing. Emergency personnel rescued four people and five others were confirmed deceased. On August 11, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas was served with the complaint filed in Durham County Superior Court on behalf of four survivors, which was later amended to include all the decedents along with the survivors. The lawsuit alleges that Duke Energy Carolinas knew that the river was used for recreational purposes and that Duke Energy did not adequately warn about the dam and that Duke Energy Carolinas created a dangerous and hidden hazard on the Dan River in building and maintaining the low head dam. Discovery has commenced and is scheduled to be completed on or before August 23, 2023. The parties are preparing for mediation, which is scheduled for March 22, 2023. Dispositive motions are due to be filed by September 6, 2023, and the case is scheduled to be trial-ready by October 2, 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
NCDEQ State Enforcement Actions
153

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NTE Carolinas II, LLC Litigation
In the first quarter of 2013, SELC sent notices of intent to sue Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress related to alleged CWA violations from coal ash basins at two coal-fired power plants in North Carolina. The NCDEQ filed enforcement actions against Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress alleging violations of water discharge permits and North Carolina groundwater standards. The cases have been consolidated and are being heard before a single judge in the North Carolina Superior Court.
On August 16, 2013, the NCDEQ filed an enforcement action against Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress related to the remaining coal-fired power plants in North Carolina, alleging violations of the CWA and violations of the North Carolina groundwater standards. Both of these cases have been assigned to the judge handling the enforcement actions discussed above. SELC is representing several environmental groups who have been permitted to intervene in these cases.
The court issued orders in 2016 granting Motions for Partial Summary Judgment for 7 of the 14 North Carolina plants with coal ash basins named in the enforcement actions. On February 13, 2017, the court issued an order denying motions for partial summary judgment brought by both the environmental groups and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress for the remaining 7 plants. On March 15,November 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filedentered into a Notice of Appealstandard FERC large generator interconnection agreement (LGIA) with theNTE Carolinas II, LLC (NTE), a company that proposed to build a combined-cycle natural gas plant in Rockingham County, North Carolina Court of Appeals to challenge the trial court’s order. The parties were unable to reach an agreement at mediation in April 2017 and submitted briefs to the trial court on remaining issues to be tried.Carolina. On August 1, 2018, the Court of Appeals dismissed the appeal.
Pursuant to the terms of the December 31,September 6, 2019, settlement agreement, discussed above, between Duke Energy Carolinas filed a lawsuit in Mecklenburg County Superior Court against NTE for breach of contract, alleging that NTE's failure to pay benchmark payments for Duke Energy Progress, NCDEQ andCarolinas' transmission system upgrades required under the community groups represented by the SELC, this litigation was dismissed on February 5, 2020, upon entryinterconnection agreement constituted a termination of the consent order in the North Carolina Superior Court.
Federal Citizens Suits
On June 13, 2016, Roanoke River Basin Association (RRBA) filed a federal citizen suit in the Middle District of North Carolina alleging unpermitted discharges to surface water and groundwater violations at the Mayo Plant. On August 19, 2016,interconnection agreement. Duke Energy Progress filedCarolinas sought a Motionmonetary judgment against NTE because NTE failed to Dismiss. On April 26, 2017, themake multiple milestone payments. The lawsuit was moved to federal court entered an order dismissing 4 of the claims in the federal citizen suit. NaN claims relating to alleged violations of National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit provisions survived the motion to dismiss, and Duke Energy Progress filed its response on May 10, 2017. Duke Energy Progress and RRBA each filed motions for summary judgment on March 23, 2018.
On May 16, 2017, RRBA filed a federal citizen suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, which asserts 2 claims relating to alleged violations of NPDES permit provisions at the Roxboro Plant and 1 claim relating to the use of nearby water bodies. Duke Energy Progress and RRBA each filed motions for summary judgment on April 17, 2018.
On May 8, 2018, on motion from Duke Energy Progress, the court ordered trial in both of the above matters to be consolidated. On April 5, 2019, Duke Energy ProgressCarolina. NTE filed a motion to stay the case following the NCDEQ’s April 1 Order. On August 2, 2019, the court ordered that this case is stayed.
On December 5, 2017, various parties filed a federal citizen suit in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina for alleged violations atdismiss Duke Energy Carolinas' Belews Creek under the CWA. Duke Energy Carolinas' answer to theCarolinas’ complaint was filed on August 27, 2018. On October 10, 2018, Duke Energy Carolinas filed Motions to Dismiss for lackand brought counterclaims alleging anti-competitive conduct and violations of standing, Motion for Judgment on the Pleadingsstate and Motion to Stay Discovery. On January 9, 2019, the court entered an order denying Duke Energy Carolinas' motion to stay discovery. There has been no ruling on the other pending motions. On April 5, 2019,federal statutes. Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion to staydismiss NTE's counterclaims. Both NTE's and Duke Energy Carolinas' motions to dismiss were subsequently denied by the case following the NCDEQ’s April 1 Order. On August 2, 2019, the court ordered that this case is stayed.court.
On December 31, 2019,May 21, 2020, in response to an NTE petition challenging Duke Energy Carolinas' termination of the LGIA, FERC issued a ruling that 1) it has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a transmission provider may terminate a LGIA; 2) FERC approval is required to terminate a conforming LGIA if objected to by the interconnection customer; and 3) Duke Energy may not announce the termination of a conforming LGIA unless FERC has approved the termination. FERC's Office of Enforcement also initiated an investigation of Duke Energy Carolinas Duke Energy Progress,into matters pertaining to the NCDEQ and various community groups including RRBA entered into a comprehensive settlement that, among other things, resolves the method of closure at the Mayo, Roxboro and Belews Creek ash basins. On February 5, 2020, the North Carolina Superior Court entered a consent order confirming the terms of the settlement agreement, upon which RRBA filed stipulations on February 11, 2020 voluntarily dismissing all 3 of these federal citizen suits with prejudice.

157




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


LGIA. Duke Energy Carolinas is cooperating with the Office of Enforcement but cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Following completion of discovery, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling in its favor as to some of its affirmative claims against NTE and to all of NTE’s counterclaims. On June 24, 2022, the court issued an order partially granting Duke Energy Carolinas' motion by dismissing NTE's counterclaims that Duke Energy Carolinas engaged in anti-competitive behavior in violation of state and federal statutes. On October 12, 2022, the parties executed a settlement agreement with respect to the remaining breach of contract claims in the litigation and a Stipulation of Dismissal was filed with the court on October 13, 2022. On November 11, 2022, NTE filed its Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit as to the District Court's summary judgment ruling in Duke Energy Carolinas' favor on NTE's antitrust and unfair competition claims. Briefing on NTE's appeal will be completed on May 3, 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Asbestos-related Injuries and Damages Claims
Duke Energy Carolinas has experienced numerous claims for indemnification and medical cost reimbursement related to asbestos exposure. These claims relate to damages for bodily injuries alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with construction and maintenance activities conducted on its electric generation plants prior to 1985. As of December 31, 2019, there were 123 asserted claims for non-malignant cases with the cumulative relief sought of up to $32 million and 49 asserted claims for malignant cases with the cumulative relief sought of up to $16 million. Based on Duke Energy Carolinas’ experience, it is expected that the ultimate resolution of most of these claims likely will be less than the amount claimed.
Duke Energy Carolinas has recognized asbestos-related reserves of $604$457 million and $630$501 million at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively. These reserves are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the reserves is a result of a third-party study completed in 2021 as well as settlements made throughout the year. These reserves are based upon Duke Energy Carolinas' best estimate for current and future asbestos claims through 20392042 and are recorded on an undiscounted basis. In light of the uncertainties inherent in a longer-term forecast, management does not believe they can reasonably estimate the indemnity and medical costs that might be incurred after 20392042 related to such potential claims. It is possible Duke Energy Carolinas may incur asbestos liabilities in excess of the recorded reserves.
Duke Energy Carolinas has third-party insurance to cover certain losses related to asbestos-related injuries and damages above an aggregate self-insured retention. Duke Energy Carolinas’ cumulative payments began to exceed the self-insurance retention in 2008. Future payments up to the policy limit will be reimbursed by the third-party insurance carrier. The insurance policy limit for potential future insurance recoveries indemnification and medical cost claim payments is $747 million in excess of the self-insured retention. Receivables for insurance recoveries were $742$595 million and $739$644 million at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively. These amounts are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets and Receivables within Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any future payments up to the policy limit will be reimbursed by the third-party insurance carrier. Duke Energy Carolinas is not aware of any uncertainties regarding the legal sufficiency of insurance claims. Duke Energy Carolinas believes the insurance recovery asset is probable of recovery as the insurance carrier continues to have a strong financial strength rating.
The reserve for credit losses for insurance receivables for the asbestos-related injuries and damages is $12 million for Duke Energy and Duke Energy Carolinas as of December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021. The insurance receivable is evaluated based on the risk of default and the historical losses, current conditions and expected conditions around collectability. Management evaluates the risk of default annually based on payment history, credit rating and changes in the risk of default from credit agencies.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida
Spent Nuclear Fuel Matters
On June 18, 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida sued the U.S. in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for damages incurred for the period 2014 through 2018. The lawsuit claimed the Department of EnergyDOE breached a contract in failing to accept spent nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and asserted damages for the cost of on-site storage in the amount of $100 million and $203$200 million for Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively. Discovery is ongoing
On March 30, 2022, the DOE and Duke Energy Progress executed a trial is expectedsettlement agreement, pursuant to occurwhich Duke Energy Progress would receive damages for costs incurred between 2014 and 2018 and would be able to submit future costs on a defined schedule. In April 2022, Duke Energy Progress received $87 million in early 2021.proceeds that related to damages incurred in 2014 through 2018.
On May 2, 2022, the DOE and Duke Energy Florida executed a settlement agreement, pursuant to which Duke Energy Florida would receive damages for costs incurred between 2014 and 2018 and would be able to submit costs incurred in 2019 and 2020 pursuant to an audit process. In June 2022, Duke Energy Florida received $180 million in proceeds that related to damages incurred in 2014 through 2018.
154

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Duke Energy FloridaIndiana
Fluor Contract LitigationCoal Ash Basin Closure Plan Appeal
On January 27, 2020, Hoosier Environmental Council (HEC) filed a Petition for Administrative Review with the Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication challenging the Indiana Department of Environmental Management’s (IDEM's) December 10, 2019 partial approval of Duke Energy Indiana’s ash pond closure plan at Duke Energy's Gallagher power station. After hearing oral arguments in early April 2021 on Duke Energy Indiana's and HEC's competing Motions for Summary Judgment, on May 4, 2021, the administrative court rejected all of HEC’s claims and issued a ruling in favor of Duke Energy Indiana. On June 3, 2021, HEC filed an appeal in Superior Court to seek judicial review of the order. Briefing on the appeal was completed on December 13, 2021.
On January 29, 2019, Fluor11, 2022, Duke Energy Indiana received a compliance obligation letter from the EPA notifying the company that the two basins at issue in the litigation are subject to requirements of the CCR Rule. The letter does not provide a deadline for compliance. Duke Energy Indiana is proceeding with surface impoundment closure at its Indiana sites consistent with EPA’s guidance, the federal CCR rule, and Indiana law, as applicable.
On April 21, 2022, HEC filed a breachmotion requesting that the court hold a hearing within 45 days and also take judicial notice of contract lawsuit in the U.S. District CourtEPA's January 11, 2022 letter. On April 22, 2022, Duke Energy Indiana sent IDEM a letter withdrawing the closure plans for the Middle DistrictGallagher North Ash Pond and Primary Pond Ash Fill. After acknowledgment by IDEM of Florida againstwithdrawal of these closure plans, Duke Energy Florida relatedIndiana filed a Motion to an EPC agreement forDismiss the CC natural gas plant in Citrus County, Florida. Fluor filed an amended complaintlitigation as moot on February 13, 2019. Fluor’s multicount complaint seeks civil, statutoryApril 28, 2022, which IDEM supported, and contractual remedies relatedthe court granted the Motion to Dismiss on July 8, 2022.
Coal Ash Insurance Coverage Litigation
In June 2022, Duke Energy Florida’s $67 million drawIndiana filed a civil action in early 2019, on Fluor’s letter of creditIndiana Superior Court against various insurance companies seeking declaratory relief with respect to insurance coverage for coal combustion residuals-related expenses and offset of invoiced amounts.liabilities covered by third-party liability insurance policies. The insurance policies cover the 1969-1972 and 1984-1985 periods and provide third-party liability insurance for claims and suits alleging property damage, bodily injury and personal injury (or a combination thereof). A trial date has not yet been set. Duke Energy Florida moved to dismiss all countsIndiana cannot predict the outcome of Fluor's amended complaint, and on April 16, 2019, the court dismissed Fluor's complaint without prejudice. On April 26, 2019, Fluor filed a second amended complaint.
On August 1, 2019, Duke Energy Florida and Fluor reached a settlement to resolve the pending litigation and other outstanding issues related to completing the Citrus County CC. Pursuant to the terms of the settlement, Fluor filed a notice of voluntary dismissal, and on August 27, 2019, the court dismissed the case with prejudice. As a result of the settlement with Fluor, Duke Energy Florida recorded a $36 million reduction to a prior-year impairment within Impairment charges on Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations in 2019.this matter.
Other Litigation and Legal Proceedings
The Duke Energy Registrants are involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve significant amounts. The Duke Energy Registrants believe the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

158




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


The table below presents recorded reserves based on management’s best estimate of probable lossposition for legal matters, excluding asbestos-related reserves.the years presented. Reserves are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities. The reasonably possible range of loss in excess of recorded reserves is not material, other than as described above.
 December 31,
(in millions)  
2019
 2018
Reserves for Legal Matters   
Duke Energy$62
 $65
Duke Energy Carolinas2
 9
Progress Energy55
 54
Duke Energy Progress12
 12
Duke Energy Florida22
 24
Piedmont1
 1

OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
General
As part of their normal business, the Duke Energy Registrants are party to various financial guarantees, performance guarantees and other contractual commitments to extend guarantees of credit and other assistance to various subsidiaries, investees and other third parties. These guarantees involve elements of performance and credit risk, which are not fully recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and have uncapped maximum potential payments. However, the Duke Energy Registrants do not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See Note 8 for more information.
Purchase Obligations
Purchased Power
Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Ohio have ongoing purchased power contracts, including renewable energy contracts, with other utilities, wholesale marketers, co-generators and qualified facilities. These purchased power contracts generally provide for capacity and energy payments. In addition, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have various contracts to secure transmission rights.
The following table presents executory purchased power contracts with terms exceeding one year, excluding contracts classified as leases.
  Minimum Purchase Amount at December 31, 2022
Contract
(in millions)Expiration20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Duke Energy Progress(a)
2028-2032$22 $21 $22 $18 $19 $27 $129 
Duke Energy Florida(b)
2024-2025300 267 91 — — — 658 
Duke Energy Ohio(c)
202455 36 — — — — 91 
(a)    Contracts represent between 18% and 100% of net plant output.
(b)    Contracts represent 100% of net plant output.
(c)    Share of net plant output varies. Excludes PPA with OVEC.
155

   Minimum Purchase Amount at December 31, 2019
 Contract              
(in millions)Expiration 2020
 2021
 2022
 2023
 2024
 Thereafter
 Total
Duke Energy Progress(a)
2021-2032 $46
 $66
 $63
 $55
 $56
 $123
 $409
Duke Energy Florida(b)
2021-2025 374
 356
 354
 374
 262
 91
 1,811
Duke Energy Ohio(c)(d)
2021-2022 132
 107
 32
 
 
 
 271
(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSContracts represent either 100% of net plant output or vary.COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
(b)Contracts represent between 81% and 100% of net plant output.
(c)Contracts represent between 1% and 9% of net plant output.
(d)Excludes PPA with OVEC. See Note 18 for additional information.
Gas Supply and Capacity Contracts
Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont routinely enter into long-term natural gas supply commodity and capacity commitments and other agreements that commit future cash flows to acquire services needed in their businesses. These commitments include pipeline and storage capacity contracts and natural gas supply contracts to provide service to customers. Costs arising from the natural gas supply commodity and capacity commitments, while significant, are pass-through costs to customers and are generally fully recoverable through the fuel adjustment or PGA proceduresprocedures and prudence reviews in North Carolina and South Carolina and under the Tennessee Incentive Plan in Tennessee. In the Midwest, these costs are recovered via the Gas Cost Recovery Rate in Ohio or the Gas Cost Adjustment Clause in Kentucky. The time periods for fixed payments under pipeline and storage capacity contracts are up to 1520 years. The time periods for fixed payments under natural gas supply contracts are up to sixfour years. The time period for the natural gas supply purchase commitments is up to 11nine years.
CertainCertain storage and pipeline capacity contracts require the payment of demand charges that are based on rates approved by the FERC in order to maintain rights to access the natural gas storage or pipeline capacity on a firm basis during the contract term. The demand charges that are incurred in each period are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as part of natural gas purchases and are included in Cost of natural gas.

159




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


The following table presents future unconditional purchase obligations under natural gas supply and capacity contracts as of December 31, 2019.
(in millions)Duke EnergyDuke Energy OhioPiedmont
2020$297
$39
$258
2021280
33
247
2022225
14
211
2023129
3
126
2024118

118
Thereafter714

714
Total$1,763
$89
$1,674

2022.

(in millions)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Duke Energy Ohio$85 $101 $85 $56 $52 $616 $995 
Piedmont319 313 267 213 203 587 1,902 
160




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES


6. LEASES
As described in Note 1, Duke Energy adopted the revised accounting guidance for Leaseseffective January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method of adoption, which does not require restatement of prior year reported results. Adoption of the new standard resulted in the recording of ROU assets and operating lease liabilities as follows:
 As of January 1, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
ROU assets$1,750
 $153
 $863
 $407
 $456
 $23
 $61
 $26
Operating lease liabilities – current205
 28
 96
 35
 61
 1
 4
 4
Operating lease liabilities – noncurrent1,504
 127
 766
 371
 395
 22
 58
 25

As part of its operations, Duke Energy leases certain aircraft, space on communication towers, industrial equipment, fleet vehicles, fuel transportation (barges and railcars), land and office space under various terms and expiration dates. Additionally, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Indiana have finance leases related to firm natural gas pipeline transportation capacity. Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have entered into certain PPAs, which are classified as finance and operating leases.
Duke Energy has certain lease agreements, which include variable lease payments that are based on the usage of an asset. These variable lease payments are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets or operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain Duke Energy lease agreements include options for renewal and early termination. The intent to renew a lease varies depending on the lease type and asset. Renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised are included in the lease measurements. The decision to terminate a lease early is dependent on various economic factors. No termination options have been included in any of the lease measurements.
Duke Energy Carolinas entered into a sale-leaseback arrangement in December 2019, to construct and occupy an office tower. The lease agreement was evaluated as a sale-leaseback of real estate and it was determined that the transaction did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. As a result, the transaction is being accounted for as a financing. For this transaction, Duke Energy Carolinas will continue to record the real estate on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within Property, Plant and Equipment as if it were the legal owner and will continue to recognize depreciation expense over the estimated useful life. In addition, a liability will be recorded for the failed sale-leaseback obligation is reported within Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the monthly lease payments commencing after the construction phase being split between interest expense and principal pay down of the debt.
Duke Energy operates various renewable energy projects and sells the generated output to utilities, electric cooperatives, municipalities and commercial and industrial customers through long-term PPAs. In certain situations, these PPAs and the associated renewable energy projects qualify as operating leases. Rental income from these leases is accounted for as Nonregulated electric and other revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. There are no minimum lease payments as all payments are contingent based on actual electricity generated by the renewable energy projects. Contingent lease payments were $264 million, $268 million and $262 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. Renewable energy projects owned by Duke Energy and accounted for as operating leases had a cost basis of $3,349 million and $3,358 million and accumulated depreciation of $721 million and $602 million at December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. These assets are principally classified as nonregulated electric generation and transmission assets.
Piedmont has an agreementcertain agreements with Duke Energy Carolinas for the construction and transportation of natural gas pipelines to supply its natural gas plant needs. Piedmont accounts for thisthese pipeline lateral contractcontracts as a lessor and sales-type leaseleases since the present value of the sum of the lease payments equals the fair value of the asset. As of December 31, 2019, theassets. These pipeline lateral assets owned by Piedmont had a current net investment basis of $4$2 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, and a long-term net investment basis of $70 million.$201 million and $203 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These assets are classified in Other, within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets, respectively, on Piedmont's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Duke Energy Carolinas accounts for the contractcontracts as a finance lease.leases. The activity for this contractthese contracts is eliminated in consolidation at Duke Energy.

161156




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES


The following table presentstables present the components of lease expense.
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Operating lease expense(a)
$292
 $47
 $161
 $69
 $92
 $11
 $20
 $5
Operating lease expense(a)
$229 $39 $153 $83 $70 $10 $19 $6 
Short-term lease expense(a)
16
 5
 9
 4
 5
 1
 2
 
Short-term lease expense(a)
4  1  1  2  
Variable lease expense(a)
47
 22
 22
 16
 6
 
 1
 1
Variable lease expense(a)
61 (1)60 37 23   1 
Finance lease expense               Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets(b)
111
 6
 21
 5
 16
 1
 
 
Amortization of leased assets(b)
151 6 61 41 20    
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
61
 15
 42
 33
 9
 
 1
 
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
50 32 49 45 4  1  
Total finance lease expense172
 21
 63
 38
 25
 1
 1
 
Total finance lease expense201 38 110 86 24  1  
Total lease expense$527
 $95
 $255
 $127
 $128
 $13
 $24
 $6
Total lease expense$495 $76 $324 $206 $118 $10 $22 $7 
(a)
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Operating lease expense(a)
$245 $43 $155 $83 $72 $11 $18 $
Short-term lease expense(a)
— — — 
Variable lease expense(a)
41 17 22 10 12 — — 
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets(b)
219 37 18 19 — — 
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
55 33 48 42 — — — 
Total finance lease expense274 38 85 60 25 — — 
Total lease expense$565 $98 $264 $154 $110 $11 $21 $
(a)    Included in Operations, maintenance and other or, for barges and railcars, Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(b)Included in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(c)Included in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents rental expense for operating leases, as reported under the former lease standard. These amounts are included in Operation, maintenance and other and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20182017
Duke Energy$268
$241
Duke Energy Carolinas49
44
Progress Energy143
130
Duke Energy Progress75
75
Duke Energy Florida68
55
Duke Energy Ohio13
15
Duke Energy Indiana21
23
Piedmont11
7

(b)    Included in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(c)    Included in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents operating lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to operating lease liabilities.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2020$268
 $31
 $123
 $51
 $72
 $2
 $5
 $5
2021216
 19
 99
 44
 55
 2
 4
 5
2022201
 19
 95
 40
 55
 2
 4
 5
2023191
 17
 95
 41
 54
 2
 4
 5
2023$225 $23 $118 $64 $54 $2 $6 $4 
2024176
 13
 95
 41
 54
 2
 4
 5
2024207 21 110 56 54 2 5 4 
20252025175 14 96 42 54 2 5 4 
20262026161 13 99 45 54 2 4  
20272027134 9 73 46 27 2 4  
Thereafter984
 57
 462
 283
 179
 21
 64
 5
Thereafter322 37 253 209 44 15 45 1 
Total operating lease payments2,036
 156

969

500

469

31

85

30
Total operating lease payments1,224 117 749 462 287 25 69 13 
Less: present value discount(396) (27) (177) (109) (68) (9) (27) (3)Less: present value discount(169)(20)(107)(76)(31)(7)(18) 
Total operating lease liabilities(a)
$1,640
 $129

$792

$391

$401

$22

$58

$27
Total operating lease liabilities(a)
$1,055 $97 $642 $386 $256 $18 $51 $13 
(a)
(a)    Certain operating lease payments include renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised.

162
157




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES


The following table presents future minimum lease payments under operating leases, which at inception had a noncancelable term of more than one year, as reported under the former lease standard.
 December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
2019$239
 $33
 $97
 $49
 $48
 $2
 $6
 $5
2020219
 29
 90
 46
 44
 2
 5
 5
2021186
 19
 79
 37
 42
 2
 4
 5
2022170
 19
 76
 34
 42
 2
 4
 5
2023160
 17
 77
 35
 42
 2
 5
 6
Thereafter1,017
 68
 455
 314
 141
 23
 66
 11
Total$1,991
 $185

$874

$515

$359

$33

$90

$37

The following table presents finance lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to finance lease liabilities.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Indiana
2020$181
 $28
 $69
 $44
 $25
 $1
2021186
 23
 69
 44
 25
 1
2022173
 23
 69
 44
 25
 1
2023175
 23
 69
 44
 25
 1
2024121
 23
 55
 44
 11
 1
Thereafter823
 314
 539
 528
 11
 27
Total finance lease payments1,659
 434
 870
 748
 122
 32
Less: amounts representing interest(690) (255) (465) (441) (24) (22)
Total finance lease liabilities$969
 $179
 $405
 $307
 $98
 $10

The following table presents future minimum lease payments under finance leases, as reported under the former lease standard.
 December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
2019$170
 $20
 $45
 $20
 $25
 $2
 $1
2020174
 20
 46
 21
 25
 
 1
2021177
 15
 45
 20
 25
 
 1
2022165
 15
 45
 21
 24
 
 1
2023165
 15
 45
 21
 24
 
 1
Thereafter577
 204
 230
 209
 21
 
 27
Minimum annual payments1,428
 289
 456
 312
 144
 2
 32
Less: amount representing interest(487) (180) (205) (175) (30) 
 (22)
Total$941
 $109
 $251
 $137
 $114
 $2
 $10

December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndiana
2023$198 $38 $103 $78 $25 $1 
2024143 38 88 79 9 1 
202576 38 85 80 5 1 
202677 38 86 81 5 1 
202774 38 82 81 1 1 
Thereafter584 427 555 555  23 
Total finance lease payments1,152 617 999 954 45 28 
Less: amounts representing interest(388)(333)(371)(367)(4)(19)
Total finance lease liabilities$764 $284 $628 $587 $41 $9 

163




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES


The following tables contain additional information related to leases.
 December 31, 2019
                December 31, 2022
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)ClassificationEnergy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)ClassificationEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Assets                Assets
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,658
 $123
 $788
 $387
 $401
 $21
 $57
 $24
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,042 $78 $628 $370 $258 $18 $49 $4 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment926
 198
 443
 308
 135
 
 7
 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment810 284 674 590 84  6  
Total lease assets $2,584
 $321
 $1,231
 $695
 $536
 $21
 $64
 $24
Total lease assets$1,852 $362 $1,302 $960 $342 $18 $55 $4 
Liabilities                Liabilities
Current                Current
OperatingOther current liabilities$208
 $27
 $95
 $37
 $58
 $1
 $3
 $4
OperatingOther current liabilities$179 $14 $96 $51 $45 $1 $4 $ 
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt119
 7
 24
 6
 18
 
 
 
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt153 7 57 35 22    
Noncurrent                Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities1,432
 102
 697
 354
 343
 21
 55
 23
OperatingOperating lease liabilities876 83 546 335 211 17 47 13 
FinanceLong-Term Debt850
 172
 381
 301
 80
 
 10
 ��
FinanceLong-Term Debt611 277 571 552 19  9  
Total lease liabilities $2,609
 $308
 $1,197
 $698
 $499
 $22
 $68
 $27
Total lease liabilities$1,819 $381 $1,270 $973 $297 $18 $60 $13 

December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)ClassificationEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Assets
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,136 $92 $691 $389 $302 $19 $53 $16 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment950 302 729 627 102 — — 
Total lease assets$2,086 $394 $1,420 $1,016 $404 $19 $60 $16 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingOther current liabilities$184 $22 $94 $50 $44 $$$
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt151 61 41 20 — — — 
Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities940 78 606 350 256 18 50 14 
FinanceLong-Term Debt764 283 629 588 41 — 10 — 
Total lease liabilities$2,039 $389 $1,390 $1,029 $361 $19 $64 $19 
158
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
                
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
               
Operating cash flows from operating leases$285
 $34
 $131
 $53
 $78
 $2
 $7
 $7
Operating cash flows from finance leases61
 15
 42
 33
 9
 
 1
 
Financing cash flows from finance leases111
 6
 21
 5
 16
 1
 
 
                
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)               
Operating(b)
$194
 $44
 $30
 $30
 $
 $
 $
 $1
Finance251
 76
 175
 175
 
 
 
 
(a)No amounts were classified as investing cash flows from operating leases for the year ended December 31, 2019.
(b)Does not include ROU assets recorded as a result of the adoption of the new lease standard.

164




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES

Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$230 $24 $118 $63 $55 $2 $6 $4 
Operating cash flows from finance leases50 32 49 45 4  1  
Financing cash flows from finance leases151 6 61 41 20    
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating(b)
$111 $10 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$245 $25 $117 $62 $55 $$$
Operating cash flows from finance leases55 33 48 42 — — — 
Financing cash flows from finance leases219 37 18 19 — — 
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating(b)
$182 $$99 $99 $— $— $— $— 
Finance322 — 322 322 — — — — 
(a)    No amounts were classified as investing cash flows from operating leases.
(b)    Does not include ROU assets recorded as a result of the adoption of the new lease standard.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases81089615151
Finance leases1017121212 23 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
Operating leases3.4 %3.8 %3.6 %3.5 %3.8 %4.2 %4.0 %3.3 %
Finance leases7.7 %11.5 %9.1 %9.1 %8.0 % %11.9 % %
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases89810716164
Finance leases1018131311— 24— 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
Operating leases3.5 %3.5 %3.6 %3.4 %3.8 %4.2 %4.1 %3.6 %
Finance leases7.3 %11.6 %9.0 %9.0 %8.2 %— %11.9 %— %
(a)    The discount rate is calculated using the rate implicit in a lease if it is readily determinable. Generally, the rate used by the lessor is not provided to Duke Energy and in these cases the incremental borrowing rate is used. Duke Energy will typically use its fully collateralized incremental borrowing rate as of the commencement date to calculate and record the lease. The incremental borrowing rate is influenced by the lessee’s credit rating and lease term and as such may differ for individual leases, embedded leases or portfolios of leased assets.
159


 December 31, 2019
                
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
 Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)               
Operating leases11
 9
 10
 12
 8
 17
 18
 6
Finance leases13
 19
 16
 18
 11
 
 26
 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
               
Operating leases3.9% 3.5% 3.8% 3.9% 3.8% 4.2% 4.1% 3.6%
Finance leases8.1% 11.8% 11.9% 12.4% 8.3% % 11.9% %
(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSThe discount rate is calculated using the rate implicit in a lease if it is readily determinable. Generally, the rate used by the lessor is not provided to Duke Energy and in these cases the incremental borrowing rate is used. Duke Energy will typically use its fully collateralized incremental borrowing rate as of the commencement date to calculate and record the lease. The incremental borrowing rate is influenced by the lessee’s credit rating and lease term and as such may differ for individual leases, embedded leases or portfolios of leased assets.DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
7. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Summary of Debt and Related Terms
The following tables summarize outstanding debt.
debt and includes debt attributable to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2022
Weighted
  Weighted
Average
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 AverageDukeDuke
Interest
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 InterestDukeEnergyProgressEnergy
(in millions)Rate
 Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
(in millions)RateEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2020-20784.02% $22,477
$1,150
$3,650
$700
$350
$1,110
$405
$2,399
Secured debt, maturing 2020-20523.30% 4,537
544
1,722
335
1,387



First mortgage bonds, maturing 2020-2049(a)
4.13% 27,977
9,557
13,800
7,575
6,225
1,449
3,169

Finance leases, maturing 2022-2051(b)
6.60% 969
179
405
307
98

10

Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2022-2041(c)
2.90% 730
243
48
48

77
362

Unsecured debt, maturing 2023-2082Unsecured debt, maturing 2023-20824.20 %$29,585 $1,150 $2,600 $ $950 $1,330 $697 $3,390 
Secured debt, maturing 2023-2052Secured debt, maturing 2023-20524.11 %5,632 1,317 2,383 1,155 1,228    
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2023-2052(a)
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2023-2052(a)
3.89 %32,645 11,306 16,350 8,776 7,576 1,850 3,138  
Finance leases, maturing 2023-2051(b)
Finance leases, maturing 2023-2051(b)
7.90 %764 284 628 587 41  9  
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2046(c)
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2046(c)
3.84 %1,331  500 500  77 352  
Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
1.98% 3,588







Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
4.50 %4,582        
Money pool/intercompany borrowings  
329
1,970
216

337
180
476
Money pool/intercompany borrowings  1,533 993 389 605 522 585 514 
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment  5
5






Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment (5)       
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
  1,294
(23)(29)(17)(11)(30)(19)(2)
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
 1,016 (21)(40)(23)(16)(25)(17)(9)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
  (316)(55)(111)(40)(62)(12)(20)(13)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
(383)(70)(132)(59)(70)(12)(22)(18)
Total debt3.92% $61,261
$11,929
$21,455
$9,124
$7,987
$2,931
$4,087
$2,860
Total debt4.09 %$75,167 $15,499 $23,282 $11,325 $10,314 $3,742 $4,742 $3,877 
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper  (3,135)






Short-term notes payable and commercial paper (3,952)       
Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings  
(29)(1,821)(66)
(312)(30)(476)Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings (1,233)(843)(238)(605)(497)(435)(514)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
  (3,141)(458)(1,577)(1,006)(571)
(503)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
 (4,154)(1,018)(697)(369)(328)(475)(303)(45)
Total long-term debt(g)

 $54,985
$11,442
$18,057
$8,052
$7,416
$2,619
$3,554
$2,384
Total long-term debt(g)
$67,061 $13,248 $21,742 $10,718 $9,381 $2,770 $4,004 $3,318 

(a)Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)Duke Energy includes $164 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Florida related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)Includes $625 million classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper program was 15 days.
(e)Duke Energy includes $1,057 million and $85 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)Duke Energy includes $27 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.
165
160




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

 December 31, 2021
Weighted
AverageDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
InterestDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)RateEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2022-20823.71 %$24,564 $1,150 $2,250 $— $150 $1,330 $700 $2,990 
Secured debt, maturing 2022-20522.50 %5,584 1,094 2,397 1,120 1,278 — — — 
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2022-2051(a)
3.87 %31,026 10,507 15,450 8,375 7,075 1,850 3,219 — 
Finance leases, maturing 2022-2051(b)
5.81 %915 289 690 629 61 — 10 — 
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2041(c)
0.65 %360 — 48 48 — 27 285 — 
Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
0.35 %3,929 — — — — — — — 
Money pool/intercompany borrowings — 526 2,959 322 199 128 150 518 
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment — — — — — — 
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
 1,119 (21)(34)(19)(14)(27)(18)(6)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
(362)(67)(128)(54)(68)(13)(23)(16)
Total debt3.50 %$67,139 $13,482 $23,632 $10,421 $8,681 $3,295 $4,323 $3,486 
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper (3,304)— — — — — — — 
Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings— (226)(2,809)(172)(199)(103)— (518)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
 (3,387)(362)(1,082)(556)(76)— (84)— 
Total long-term debt(g)
$60,448 $12,894 $19,741 $9,693 $8,406 $3,192 $4,239 $2,968 

(a)    Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(a)Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)Duke Energy includes $44 million and $419 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively, related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)Includes $625 million classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper program was 14 days.
(e)Duke Energy includes $1,275 million and $137 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)Duke Energy includes $37 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)
(b)    Duke Energy includes $256 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Florida related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)    Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)    Includes $625 million that was classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper programs was 15 days.
(e)    Duke Energy includes $1,121 million and $100 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)    Duke Energy includes $29 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)     Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.
 December 31, 2018
 Weighted
         
 Average
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Interest
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)Rate
 Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2019-20784.26% $20,955
$1,150
$3,800
$50
$350
$1,000
$408
$2,150
Secured debt, maturing 2020-20373.69% 4,297
450
1,703
300
1,403



First mortgage bonds, maturing 2019-2048(a)
4.32% 25,628
8,759
13,100
7,574
5,526
1,099
2,670

Finance leases, maturing 2019-2051(b)
5.06% 941
109
251
137
114
2
10

Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2019-2041(c)
3.40% 941
243
48
48

77
572

Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
2.73% 4,035







Money pool/intercompany borrowings  
739
1,385
444
108
299
317
198
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment  5
5






Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
  1,434
(23)(29)(15)(11)(31)(8)(1)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
  (297)(54)(112)(40)(61)(7)(20)(11)
Total debt4.13% $57,939
$11,378
$20,146
$8,498
$7,429
$2,439
$3,949
$2,336
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper  (3,410)






Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings  
(439)(1,235)(294)(108)(274)(167)(198)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
  (3,406)(6)(1,672)(603)(270)(551)(63)(350)
Total long-term debt(g)

 $51,123
$10,933
$17,239
$7,601
$7,051
$1,614
$3,719
$1,788

(a)Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)Duke Energy includes $63 million and $531 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively, related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)Includes $625 million that was classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper programs was 16 days.
(e)Duke Energy includes $1,380 million and $156 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)Duke Energy includes $41 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.

166




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES


Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt
The following table shows the significant components of Current maturities of Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Duke Energy Registrants currently anticipate satisfying these obligations with cash on hand and proceeds from additional borrowings.
(in millions)Maturity Date Interest Rate
 December 31, 2019
(in millions)Maturity DateInterest RateDecember 31, 2022
Unsecured Debt    Unsecured Debt
Duke Energy (Parent)Duke Energy (Parent)April 20232.875 %$350 
Duke Energy (Parent)(a)June 2020 2.100% $330
June 20233.469 %500 
Duke Energy (Parent)Duke Energy (Parent)October 20233.950 %400 
Duke Energy Ohio(a)
Duke Energy Ohio(a)
October 20234.272 %150 
Duke Energy Indiana(a)
Duke Energy Indiana(a)
October 20234.118 %300 
First Mortgage BondsFirst Mortgage Bonds
Duke Energy CarolinasDuke Energy CarolinasMarch 20232.500 %500 
Duke Energy CarolinasDuke Energy CarolinasMarch 20233.050 %500 
Duke Energy ProgressDecember 2020 2.510%
(a) 
700
Duke Energy ProgressSeptember 20233.375 %300 
First Mortgage Bonds    
Duke Energy FloridaJanuary 2020 1.850% 250
Duke Energy FloridaApril 2020 4.550% 250
Duke Energy CarolinasJune 2020 4.300% 450
Duke Energy IndianaJuly 2020 3.750% 500
Duke Energy ProgressSeptember 2020 2.065%
(a) 
300
Duke Energy OhioDuke Energy OhioSeptember 20233.800 %300 
Other(b)
   361
Other(b)
854 
Current maturities of long-term debt   $3,141
Current maturities of long-term debt$4,154 

(a)    Debt has a floating interest rate.
(b)    Includes finance lease obligations, amortizing debt, tax-exempt bonds with mandatory put options and small bullet maturities.
161

(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDebt has a floating interest rate.DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
(b)Includes finance lease obligations, amortizing debt and small bullet maturities.
Maturities and Call Options
The following table shows the annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter. Amounts presented exclude short-term notes payable, commercial paper and money pool borrowings and debt issuance costs for the Subsidiary Registrants.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)
Energy(a)

 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)
Energy(a)
CarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2020$3,141
 $458
 $1,578
 $1,006
 $572
 
 $503
 $
20215,053
 504
 2,257
 932
 825
 50
 70
 160
20224,334
 830
 1,048
 508
 90
 
 94
 
20233,112
 1,006
 398
 319
 79
 325
 3
 45
2023$4,154 $1,018 $697 $369 $328 $475 $303 $45 
20241,965
 306
 227
 160
 67
 25
 154
 40
20243,216 19 939 72 867  4 40 
202520254,322 491 1,040 975 65 245 4 205 
202620262,682 621 345 279 66 45 4 40 
202720273,203 323 947 233 714 102 177 300 
Thereafter39,542
 8,875
 14,267
 6,190
 6,427
 2,261
 3,272
 2,155
Thereafter52,999 11,884 18,642 9,238 7,753 2,415 3,853 2,760 
Total long-term debt, including current maturities$57,147

$11,979

$19,775

$9,115

$8,060

$2,661

$4,096
 $2,400
Total long-term debt, including current maturities$70,576 $14,356 $22,610 $11,166 $9,793 $3,282 $4,345 $3,390 
(a)Excludes $1,448 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to the Progress Energy merger and the Piedmont acquisition.
(a)    Excludes $1,169 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to the Progress Energy merger and the Piedmont acquisition.
The Duke Energy Registrants have the ability under certain debt facilities to call and repay the obligation prior to its scheduled maturity. Therefore, the actual timing of future cash repayments could be materially different than as presented above.

167




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES


Short-Term Obligations Classified as Long-Term Debt
Tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder and certain commercial paper issuances and money pool borrowings are classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These tax-exempt bonds, commercial paper issuances and money pool borrowings, which are short-term obligations by nature, are classified as long-term due to Duke Energy’s intent and ability to utilize such borrowings as long-term financing. As Duke Energy’s Master Credit Facility and other bilateral letter of credit agreements have non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of the balance sheet date, Duke Energy has the ability to refinance these short-term obligations on a long-term basis. The following tables show short-term obligations classified as long-term debt.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Progress
 Ohio
 Indiana
Tax-exempt bonds$312
 $
 $
 $27
 $285
Commercial paper(a)
625
 300
 150
 25
 150
Total$937

$300
 $150

$52

$435
December 31, 2018 December 31, 2022 and 2021
  Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
DukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
DukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Progress
 Ohio
 Indiana
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasProgressOhioIndiana
Tax-exempt bonds$312
 $
 $
 $27
 $285
Tax-exempt bonds$312 $ $ $27 $285 
Commercial paper(a)
625
 300
 150
 25
 150
Commercial paper(a)
625 300 150 25 150 
Total$937

$300

$150
 $52

$435
Total$937 $300 $150 $52 $435 
(a)
(a)    Progress Energy amounts are equal to Duke Energy Progress amounts.

168




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES


Summary of Significant Debt Issuances
In January 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas issued $1.8 billion of first mortgage bonds. The issuance was split between a $900 million,10-year tranche at 4.95% and a $900 million, 30-year tranche at 5.35%. The net proceeds will be used to refinance $1 billion of Duke Energy Carolinas bonds maturing in March 2023, to pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
162

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
The following tables summarize significant debt issuances (in millions).
     Year Ended December 31, 2019
       Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Maturity Interest
 Duke
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
Issuance DateDate Rate
 Energy
 (Parent)
 Carolinas
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Unsecured Debt                   
March 2019(a)
Mar 2022 2.538%
(b) 
$300
 $300
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
March 2019(a)
Mar 2022 3.227% 300
 300
 
 
 
 
 
 
May 2019(e)
Jun 2029 3.500% 600
 
 
 
 
 
 
 600
June 2019(a)
Jun 2029 3.400% 600
 600
 
 
 
 
 
 
June 2019(a)
Jun 2049 4.200% 600
 600
 
 
 
 
 
 
July 2019(g)
Jul 2049 4.320% 40
 
 
 
 
 40
 
 
September 2019(g)
Oct 2025 3.230% 95
 
 
 
 
 95
 
 
September 2019(g)
Oct 2029 3.560% 75
 
 
 
 
 75
 
 
November 2019(h)
Nov 2021 2.167%
(b) 
200
 
 
 
 200
 
 
 
First Mortgage Bonds 
 

       
      
January 2019(c)
Feb 2029 3.650% 400
 
 
 
 
 400
 
 
January 2019(c)
Feb 2049 4.300% 400
 
 
 
 
 400
 
 
March 2019(d)
Mar 2029 3.450% 600
 
 
 600
 
 
 
 
August 2019(a)
Aug 2029 2.450%
450
 
 450
 
 
 
 
 
August 2019(a)
Aug 2049 3.200% 350
 
 350
 
 
 
 
 
September 2019(f)
Oct 2049 3.250% 500
 
 
 
 
 
 500
 
November 2019(i)
Dec 2029 2.500% 700
 
 
 
 700
 
 
 
Total issuances    $6,210
 $1,800

$800
 $600
 $900
 $1,010
 $500
 $600
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
MaturityInterestDukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Issuance DateDateRateEnergy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaPiedmont
Unsecured Debt
May 2022(a)
May 20525.050 %$400 $ $ $ $ $400 
June 2022(b)
June 20284.750 %645 645     
June 2022(b)
June 20345.306 %537 537     
August 2022(c)
March 20284.300 %900 900     
August 2022(c)
August 20324.500 %1,150 1,150     
August 2022(c)
August 20525.000 %1,150 1,150    
December 2022(d)
December 20255.000 %500 500     
December 2022(d)
December 20275.000 %500 500     
First Mortgage Bonds
March 2022(e)
March 20322.850 %500  500    
March 2022(e)
March 20523.550 %650  650    
March 2022(e)
April 20323.400 %500   500   
March 2022(e)
April 20524.000 %

400   400   
November 2022(f)
November 20525.950 %500    500  
Tax-exempt Bonds
June 2022(g)
September 20304.000 %168 168     
June 2022(g)
November 20394.250 %234 234     
September 2022(h)
October 20463.300 %200   200  
September 2022(i)
October 20463.700 %210   210  
September 2022(i)
October 20464.000 %42   42  
Total issuances$9,186 $5,784 $1,150 $1,352 $500 $400 
(a)Debt issued to pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Debt issuance has a floating interest rate.
(c)Debt issued to repay at maturity $450 million first mortgage bonds due April 2019, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(d)Debt issued to fund eligible green energy projects in the Carolinas.
(e)Debt issued to repay in full the outstanding $350 million Piedmont unsecured term loan due September 2019, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(f)Debt issued to retire $150 million of pollution control bonds, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(g)Debt issued to repay at maturity $100 million debentures due October 2019, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(h)Debt issued to fund storm restoration costs and for general corporate purposes.
(i)Debt issued to reimburse the payment of existing and new Eligible Green Expenditures in Florida.
In January 2020, (a)Debt issued to repay a portion of outstanding intercompany short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Duke Energy Carolinas closed(Parent) issued 600 million euros aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due June 2028 and funded $900500 million euros aggregate principal amount of first mortgage bonds of which3.85% senior notes due June 2034. Debt issued to repay a $500 million carrydebt maturity, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes. Duke Energy's obligations under its euro-denominated fixed-rate notes were effectively converted to fixed-rate U.S. dollars at issuance through cross-currency swaps, mitigating foreign currency exchange risk associated with the interest and principal payments. See Note 15 for additional information.
(c)Debt issued to repay a fixed interest rateportion of 2.45%short-term debt and mature February 2030 and $400 million carry a fixed interest rate of 3.20% and mature August 2049. The proceedsfor general corporate purposes.
(d)Proceeds will be used to repay at maturity $450 million, 4.30% debentures maturing June 2020,a portion of commercial paper and for general corporate purposes.

(e)Debt issued to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, existing or new eligible projects under the sustainable financing framework.
(f)Debt issued to repay a portion of outstanding intercompany short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(g)Debt issued to refund the Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding bonds, previously held in treasury, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain solid waste disposal facilities. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is June 1, 2027.
(h)Debt issued to provide funds to refund the prior bonds, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain air and water pollution control equipment and solid waste disposal equipment. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is October 1, 2026.
(i)Debt issued to provide funds to refund the prior bonds, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain air and water pollution control equipment and solid waste disposal equipment. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is October 1, 2030.
169
163




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES

Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
MaturityInterestDukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Issuance DateDateRateEnergy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaPiedmont
Unsecured Debt
March 2021a)
March 20312.500 %$350 $— $— $— $— $350 
June 2021(b)(c)
June 20230.299 %500 500 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20312.550 %1,000 1,000 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20413.300 %750 750 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20513.500 %750 750 — — — — 
September 2021(d)
January 20823.250 %500 500 — — — — 
Secured Debt
November 2021(e)
July 20311.679 %100 — 100 — — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20412.617 %137 — 137 — — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20281.295 %221 — — 221 — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20372.387 %352 — — 352 — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20412.799 %197 — — 197 — — 
First Mortgage Bonds
April 2021(f)
April 20312.550 %550 — 550 — — — 
April 2021(f)
April 20513.450 %450 — 450 — — — 
August 2021(g)
August 20312.000 %650 — — 650 — — 
August 2021(g)
August 20512.900 %450 — — 450 — — 
December 2021(h)
December 20312.400 %650 — — — 650 — 
December 2021(h)
December 20513.000 %500 — — — 500 — 
Total issuances$8,107 $3,500 $1,237 $1,870 $1,150 $350 

(a)Debt issued to repay at maturity $160 million senior unsecured notes due June 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Debt has a floating interest rate.
     Year Ended December 31, 2018
       Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Maturity Interest
 Duke
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
Issuance DateDate Rate
 Energy
 (Parent)
 Carolinas
 Progress
 Florida
Unsecured Debt             
March 2018(a)
April 2025 3.950% $250
 $250
 $
 $
 $
May 2018(b)
May 2021 3.114% 500
 500
 
 
 
September 2018(c)
September 2078 5.625% 500
 500
 
 
 
First Mortgage Bonds             
March 2018(d)
March 2023 3.050% 500
 
 500
 
 
March 2018(d)
March 2048 3.950% 500
 
 500
 
 
June 2018(e)
July 2028 3.800% 600
 
 
 
 600
June 2018(e)
July 2048 4.200% 400
 
 
 
 400
August 2018(f)
September 2023 3.375% 300
 
 
 300
 
August 2018(f)
September 2028 3.700% 500
 
 
 500
 
November 2018(g)
May 2022 3.350% 350
 
 350
 
 
November 2018(g)
November 2028 3.950% 650
 
 650
 
 
Total issuances    $5,050
 $1,250

$2,000
 $800

$1,000
(c)Debt issued to repay $1.75 billion of Duke Energy (Parent) debt maturities, to repay a portion of short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(a)Debt issued to pay down short-term debt.
(b)Debt issued to pay down short-term debt. Debt issuance has a floating debt rate.
(c)Callable after September 2023 at par. Junior subordinated hybrid debt issued to pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(d)Debt issued to repay at maturity a $300 million first mortgage bond due April 2018, pay down intercompany short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(e)Debt issued to repay a portion of intercompany short-term debt under the money pool borrowing arrangement and for general corporate purposes.
(f)Debt issued to repay short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(g)Debt issued to fund eligible green energy projects, including zero-carbon solar and energy storage, in the Carolinas.
Available(d)Debt issued to repay in October 2021 $500 million of Duke Energy (Parent) unsecured notes. The interest rate resets every five years.
(e)Debt issued to finance the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego.
(f)Debt issued to repay at maturity $500 million first mortgage bonds due June 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(g)Debt issued to repay at maturity a total of $600 million first mortgage bonds due September 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(h)Proceeds were used to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, existing or new eligible projects under the sustainable financing framework.
AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES
Master Credit FacilitiesFacility
In March 2019,2022, Duke Energy amended its existing $8 billion Master Credit Facility to increase the amount of the facility from $8 billion to $9 billion and to extend the termination date to March 2024.2027. The Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, have borrowing capacity under the Master Credit Facility up to a specified sublimit for each borrower. Duke Energy has the unilateral ability at any time to increase or decrease the borrowing sublimits of each borrower, subject to a maximum sublimit for each borrower. The amount available under the Master Credit Facility has been reduced to backstop issuances of commercial paper, certain letters of credit and variable-rate demand tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress are also required to each maintain $250 million of available capacity under the Master Credit Facility as security to meet obligations under plea agreements reached with the U.S. Department of Justice in 2015 related to violations at North Carolina facilities with ash basins.
164

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
The table below includes the current borrowing sublimits and available capacity under these credit facilities.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2022
  Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 (Parent)
 Carolinas
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)Energy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Facility size(a)
$8,000
 $2,650
 $1,500
 $1,250
 $800
 $600
 $600
 $600
Facility size(a)
$9,000 $2,375 $1,925 $800 $1,150 $900 $1,050 $800 
Reduction to backstop issuances               Reduction to backstop issuances
Commercial paper(b)
(2,537) (1,119) (325) (207) 
 (296) (176) (414)
Commercial paper(b)
(3,685)463 (1,533)(389)(605)(522)(585)(514)
Outstanding letters of credit(50) (42) (4) (2) 
 
 
 (2)Outstanding letters of credit(40)(27)(4)(2)(7)   
Tax-exempt bonds(81) 
 
 
 
 
 (81) 
Tax-exempt bonds(81)     (81) 
Coal ash set-aside(500) 
 (250) (250) 
 
 
 
Available capacity$4,832

$1,489

$921

$791

$800

$304

$343
 $184
Available capacity$5,194 $2,811 $388 $409 $538 $378 $384 $286 

(a)    Represents the sublimit of each borrower.
(a)Represents the sublimit of each borrower.
(b)
(b)    Duke Energy issued $625 million of commercial paper and loaned the proceeds through the money pool to Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. The balances are classified as Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

170




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES


Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility
Duke Energy (Parent) has a $1 billion revolving credit facility. The facility had an initial termination date of June 2020, but in May 2019,Term Loan Facility
On March 9, 2022, Duke Energy extended the termination(Parent) entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement) with commitments totaling $1.4 billion maturing on March 9, 2024. The maturity date of the facilityCredit Agreement may be extended for up to May 2022. Borrowings under this facility will be used for general corporate purposes. Astwo years by request of December 31, 2019, $500 million has been drawn under this facility. This balance is classified as Long-term debt on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any undrawn commitments can be drawn, and borrowings can be prepaid, at any time throughout the term of the facility. The terms and conditions of the facility are generally consistent with those governing Duke Energy's Master Credit Facility.
Duke Energy Progress Term Loan Facility
In December 2018, Duke Energy Progress entered into a two-year term loan facility with commitments totaling $700 million.(Parent), upon satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the facility were used to pay storm-related costs, pay down commercial paper and to partially finance an upcoming bond maturity. As of December 31, 2019, the entire $700 million has beenrepay amounts drawn under the Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of Duke Energy's outstanding commercial paper. In December 2022, Duke Energy (Parent) repaid $400 million of the term loan. ThisThe balance is classified as Current maturities of long-term debtLong-Term Debt on Duke Energy Progress'Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility was terminated in March 2022.
PiedmontDuke Energy Florida Term Loan Facility
In May 2019, the $350October 2022, Duke Energy Florida entered into a term loan facility with commitments totaling $800 million Piedmontexpiring in April 2024. The term loan was paid off in full with proceeds fromfully drawn at the $600 million Piedmont debt offering.time of closing In October and borrowings were used for storm costs, under-collected fuel and general company purposes. The balance is classified as Long-Term Debt on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other Debt Matters
In September 2019,2022, Duke Energy filed a Form S-3 with the SEC. Under this Form S-3, which is uncapped, the Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, may issue debt and other securities, including preferred stock, in the future at amounts, prices and with terms to be determined at the time of future offerings. The registration statement was filed to replace a similar prior filing upon expiration of its three-year term and also allows for the issuance of common and preferred stock by Duke Energy. The expired Form S-3 was amended
Also in March 2019,September 2022, to allowreplace another similar prior filing, Duke Energy to issue preferred stock.
Duke Energy hasfiled an effective Form S-3 with the SEC to sell up to $3$4 billion of variable denomination floating-rate demand notes, called PremierNotes. The Form S-3 states that no more than $1.5$2 billion of the notes will be outstanding at any particular time. The notes are offered on a continuous basis and bear interest at a floating rate per annum determined by the Duke Energy PremierNotes Committee, or its designee, on a weekly basis. The interest rate payable on notes held by an investor may vary based on the principal amount of the investment. The notes have no stated maturity date, are non-transferable and may be redeemed in whole or in part by Duke Energy or at the investor’s option at any time. The balance as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, was $1,049$897 million and $1,010$1,066 million, respectively. The notes are short-term debt obligations of Duke Energy and are reflected as Notes payable and commercial paper on Duke Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Money Pool and Intercompany Credit Agreements
The Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, are eligible to receive support for their short-term borrowing needs through participation with Duke Energy and certain of its subsidiaries in a money pool arrangement. Under this arrangement, those companies with short-term funds may provide short-term loans to affiliates participating in this arrangement. The money pool is structured such that the Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, separately manage their cash needs and working capital requirements. Accordingly, there is no net settlement of receivables and payables between money pool participants. Duke Energy (Parent), may loan funds to its participating subsidiaries, but may not borrow funds through the money pool. Accordingly, as the money pool activity is between Duke Energy and its wholly owned subsidiaries, all money pool balances are eliminated within Duke Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Money pool receivable balances are reflected within Notes receivable from affiliated companies on the Subsidiary Registrants’ Consolidated Balance Sheets. Money pool payable balances are reflected within either Notes payable to affiliated companies or Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies on the Subsidiary Registrants’ Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In March 2022, Progress Energy closed a revolving credit agreement with Duke Energy (Parent), which allowed up to $2.5 billion in intercompany borrowings.
165

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Restrictive Debt Covenants
The Duke Energy Registrants’ debt and credit agreements contain various financial and other covenants. Duke Energy's Master Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring the debt-to-total capitalization ratio not to exceed 65% for each borrower, excluding Piedmont, and 70% for Piedmont. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements. As of December 31, 2019, each2022, Duke Energy presented approximately $131 million of long-term debt as current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a result of a technical default due to the bankruptcy filing of a Duke Energy customer. The Duke Energy Registrants waswere in compliance with all other covenants related to their debt agreements.agreements as of December 31, 2022. In addition, some credit agreements may allow for acceleration of payments or termination of the agreements due to nonpayment, or acceleration of other significant indebtedness of the borrower or some of its subsidiaries. None of the debt or credit agreements contain material adverse change clauses.
Other Loans
As of December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, Duke Energy had loans outstanding of $777$852 million, including $36$33 million at Duke Energy Progress and $741$819 million, including $37$34 million at Duke Energy Progress, respectively, against the cash surrender value of life insurance policies it owns on the lives of its executives. The amounts outstanding were carried as a reduction of the related cash surrender value that is included in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

171




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGUARANTEES AND INDEMNIFICATIONS


8. GUARANTEES AND INDEMNIFICATIONS
Duke Energy has various financial and performance guarantees and indemnifications with non-consolidated entities, which are issued in the normal course of business. As discussed below, these contracts include performance guarantees, standby letters of credit, debt guarantees and indemnifications.indemnifications and include guarantees and indemnifications related to Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Duke Energy enters into these arrangements to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party. At December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy does not believe conditions are likely for significant performance under these guarantees. To the extent liabilities are incurred as a result of the activities covered by the guarantees, such liabilities are included on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On January 2, 2007, Duke Energy completed the spin-off of its previously wholly-ownedwholly owned natural gas businesses to shareholders. Guarantees issued by Duke Energy or its affiliates, or assigned to Duke Energy prior to the spin-off, remained with Duke Energy subsequent to the spin-off. Guarantees issued by Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (Spectra Capital) or its affiliates prior to the spin-off remained with Spectra Capital subsequent to the spin-off, except for guarantees that were later assigned to Duke Energy. Duke Energy has indemnified Spectra Capital against any losses incurred under certain of the guarantee obligations that remain with Spectra Capital. At December 31, 2019,2022, the maximum potential amount of future payments associated with these guarantees were $65$40 million, the majority of which expiresexpire by 2028.
In October 2017, ACP executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. Duke Energy entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the ACP revolving credit facility. In July 2020, ACP reduced the size of the credit facility to $1.9 billion. Duke Energy's maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee is $827was $860 million as of December 31, 2019.2020. This amount representsrepresented 47% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility.facility and was recognized within Other Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, of which $95 million was previously recognized due the adoption of new guidance for credit losses effective January 1, 2020. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. See Notes 4 and 13 for more information.
In addition to the Spectra Capital and ACP revolving credit facility guarantees above, Duke Energy has issued performance guarantees to customers and other third parties that guarantee the payment and performance of other parties, including certain non-wholly owned entities, as well as guarantees of debt of certain non-consolidated entities. If such entities were to default on payments or performance, Duke Energy would be required under the guarantees to make payments on the obligations of these entities. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these guarantees as of December 31, 2019,2022, was $128$33 million of which $114 millionall expire between 20202024 and 2030, with the remaining performance guarantees having no contractual expiration. Additionally, certain guarantees have uncapped maximum potential payments; however, Duke Energy does not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Duke Energy uses bank-issued standby letters of credit to secure the performance of wholly owned and non-wholly owned entities to a third party or customer. Under these arrangements, Duke Energy has payment obligations to the issuing bank that are triggered by a draw by the third party or customer due to the failure of the wholly owned or non-wholly owned entity to perform according to the terms of its underlying contract. At December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy had issued a total of $634$667 million in letters of credit, which expire between 20202023 and 2022.2028. The unused amount under these letters of credit was $81$35 million.
Duke Energy recognized $23$2 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively, primarily in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the guarantees discussed above. As current estimates change, additional losses related to guarantees and indemnifications to third parties, which could be material, may be recorded by the Duke Energy Registrants in the future.
9. JOINT OWNERSHIP OF GENERATING AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants maintain ownership interests in certain jointly owned generating and transmission facilities. The Duke Energy Registrants are entitled to a share of the generating capacity and output of each unit equal to their respective ownership interests. The Duke Energy Registrants pay their ownership share of additional construction costs, fuel inventory purchases and operating expenses. The Duke Energy Registrants share of revenues and operating costs of the jointly owned facilities is included within the corresponding line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Each participant in the jointly owned facilities must provide its own financing.
166

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJOINT OWNERSHIP OF GENERATING AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
The following table presents the Duke Energy Registrants' interest of jointly owned plant or facilities and amounts included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All facilities are operated by the Duke Energy Registrants and are included in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment.
 December 31, 2019
       Construction
 Ownership
 Property, Plant
 Accumulated
 Work in
(in millions except for ownership interest)Interest
 and Equipment
 Depreciation
 Progress
Duke Energy Carolinas 
      
Catawba (units 1 and 2)(a)
19.25% $1,011
 $510
 $21
W.S. Lee CC(b)
87.27% 609
 32
 1
Duke Energy Indiana 
  
  
  
Gibson (unit 5)(c)
50.05% 410
 183
 3
Vermillion(d)
62.50% 172
 119
 
Transmission and local facilities(c)
Various
 5,421
 1,436
 172

(a)Jointly owned with North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, NCEMC and PMPA.
(b)Jointly owned with NCEMC.
(c)Jointly owned with WVPA and IMPA.
(d)Jointly owned with WVPA.

172

 December 31, 2022
Construction
OwnershipProperty, PlantAccumulatedWork in
(in millions except for ownership interest)Interestand EquipmentDepreciationProgress
Duke Energy Carolinas    
Catawba (units 1 and 2)(a)
19.25 %$1,047 $546 $32 
W.S. Lee CC(b)
87.27 %613 86 48 
Duke Energy Indiana    
Gibson (unit 5)(c)
50.05 %450 241 2 
Vermillion(d)
62.50 %182 113 1 
Transmission and local facilities(c)
Various6,718 1,510 157 

(a)    Jointly owned with North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, NCEMC and PMPA.

(b)    Jointly owned with NCEMC.

(c)    Jointly owned with WVPA and IMPA.
(d)    Jointly owned with WVPA.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS


10. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Duke Energy records an ARO when it has a legal obligation to incur retirement costs associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the obligation can be reasonably estimated. Certain assets of the Duke Energy Registrants have an indeterminate life, such as transmission and distribution facilities, and thus the fair value of the retirement obligation is not reasonably estimable. A liability for these AROs will be recorded when a fair value is determinable.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated operations accrue costs of removal for property that does not have an associated legal retirement obligation based on regulatory orders from state commissions. These costs of removal are recorded as a regulatory liability in accordance with regulatory accounting treatment. The Duke Energy Registrants do not accrue the estimated cost of removal for any nonregulated assets. See Note 4 for the estimated cost of removal for assets without an associated legal retirement obligation, which are included in Regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents the AROs recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Decommissioning of nuclear power facilities(a)
$6,633
 $2,551
 $4,028
 $3,499
 $529
 $
 $
 $
Decommissioning of nuclear power facilities(a)
$7,261 $3,009 $4,217 $3,948 $270 $ $ $ 
Closure of ash impoundments6,333
 3,118
 2,368
 2,352
 16
 41
 805
 
Closure of ash impoundments5,176 2,309 1,862 1,833 29 95 911  
Other352
 65
 75
 42
 33
 39
 27
 17
Other291 64 102 42 59 59 40 26 
Total asset retirement obligation$13,318
 $5,734
 $6,471
 $5,893
 $578
 $80
 $832

$17
Total asset retirement obligation$12,728 $5,382 $6,181 $5,823 $358 $154 $951 $26 
Less: current portion881
 206
 485
 485
 
 1
 189
 
Less: Current portionLess: Current portion773 261 289 288 1 17 207  
Total noncurrent asset retirement obligation$12,437
 $5,528
 $5,986
 $5,408
 $578
 $79
 $643

$17
Total noncurrent asset retirement obligation$11,955 $5,121 $5,892 $5,535 $357 $137 $744 $26 
(a)Duke Energy amount includes purchase accounting adjustments related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(a)    Duke Energy amount includes purchase accounting adjustments related to the merger with Progress Energy.
Nuclear Decommissioning Liability
AROs related to nuclear decommissioning are based on site-specific cost studies. The NCUC, PSCSC and FPSC require updated cost estimates for decommissioning nuclear plants every five years.
The following table summarizes information about the most recent site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost studies. Decommissioning costs are stated in 2018 or 2019 dollars, depending on the year of the cost study, and include costs to decommission plant components not subject to radioactive contamination.
Annual FundingDecommissioning
(in millions)
Requirement(a)
Costs(a)
Year of Cost Study
Duke Energy$10 $9,105 2018 or 2019
Duke Energy Carolinas(b)(c)
 4,365 2018
Duke Energy Progress(d)
10 4,181 2019
Duke Energy Florida(e)
 559 N/A
167

 Annual Funding
 Decommissioning
  
(in millions)
Requirement(a)

 
Costs(a)

 Year of Cost Study
Duke Energy$24
 $9,152

2018 and 2019
Duke Energy Carolinas(b)(c)

 4,365

2018
Duke Energy Progress(d)
24
 4,181

2019
Duke Energy Florida(e)

 606

2019
(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSAmounts for Progress Energy equal the sum of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
(b)Decommissioning cost for Duke Energy Carolinas reflects its ownership interest in jointly owned reactors. Other joint owners are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their interest in the reactors.
(c)Duke Energy Carolinas' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2018 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019. A new funding study was also completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019.
(d)Duke Energy Progress' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2019 is expected to be filed with the NCUC and PSCSC during the first quarter 2020. Duke Energy Progress will also complete a new funding study, which will be completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in July 2020.
(e)During 2019, Duke Energy Florida reached an agreement to transfer decommissioning work for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party. The agreement requires regulatory approval from the NRC and the FPSC. See Note 4 for more information.
(a)    Amount represents annual funding requirement for the current fiscal year. Amounts for Progress Energy equal the sum of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
(b)    Decommissioning costs for Duke Energy Carolinas reflects its ownership interest in jointly owned reactors. Other joint owners are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their interest in the reactors.
(c)    Duke Energy Carolinas' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2018 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019. A new funding study was also completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019.
(d)    Duke Energy Progress' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2019 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in March 2020. Duke Energy Progress also completed a funding study, which was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in July 2020. In October 2021, Duke Energy Progress filed the 2019 nuclear decommissioning cost study with the FERC, as well as a revised rate schedule for decommissioning expense to be collected from wholesale customers. The FERC accepted the filing, as filed on December 9, 2021.
(e)    During 2019, Duke Energy Florida reached an agreement to transfer decommissioning work for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party and decommissioning costs are based on the agreement with this third party rather than a cost study. Regulatory approval was received from the NRC and the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida each maintain NDTFs that are intended to pay for the decommissioning costs of their respective nuclear power plants. The NDTF investments are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies including the NRC, FERC, NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC and the IRS.
Use of the NDTF investments is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities including license termination, spent fuel and site restoration. The license termination and spent fuel obligations relate to contaminated decommissioning and are recorded as AROs. The site restoration obligation relates to non-contaminated decommissioning and is recorded to cost of removal within Regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

173




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS


The following table presents the fair value of NDTF assets legally restricted for purposes of settling AROs associated with nuclear decommissioning. Duke Energy Florida is actively decommissioningentered into an agreement with a third party to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and was granted an exemption from the NRC, which allows for use of the NDTF for all aspects of nuclear decommissioning. The entire balance of Duke Energy Florida's NDTF may be applied toward license termination, spent fuel and site restoration costs incurred to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and is excluded from the table below. See Note 17 for additional information related to the fair value of the Duke Energy Registrants' NDTFs.
 December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018
Duke Energy$6,766
 $5,579
Duke Energy Carolinas3,837
 3,133
Duke Energy Progress2,929
 2,446

December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Duke Energy$7,466 $8,933 
Duke Energy Carolinas4,208 5,068 
Duke Energy Progress3,258 3,865 
Nuclear Operating Licenses
OperatingAs described in Note 4, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear units are potentially subject to extension.stations. The following table includes the current expiration of nuclear operating licenses.
UnitYear of Expiration
Duke Energy Carolinas
Catawba Units 1 and 22043
UnitYear of Expiration
Duke Energy Carolinas
Catawba Units 1 and 22043
McGuire Unit 12041
McGuire Unit 22043
Oconee Units 1 and 22033
Oconee Unit 32034
Duke Energy Progress
Brunswick Unit 12036
Brunswick Unit 22034
Harris2046
Robinson2030

The NRC has acknowledged permanent cessation of operation and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessel at Crystal River Unit 3. Therefore, the license no longer authorizes operation of the reactor. InDuring 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into an agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3. The agreement is subject to theRegulatory approval ofwas received from the NRC and FPSC.the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively. See Note 4 for more information.
ClosureDuke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio has two reportable segments, EU&I and GU&I.
EU&I transmits and distributes electricity in portions of Ohio and generates, distributes and sells electricity in portions of Northern Kentucky. GU&I transports and sells natural gas in portions of Ohio and Northern Kentucky. Both reportable segments conduct operations primarily through Duke Energy Ohio and its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky. The remainder of Duke Energy Ohio's operations is presented as Other.
All Duke Energy Ohio assets and revenues from continuing operations are within the U.S.
Year Ended December 31, 2022
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,798 $716 $2,514 $ $ $2,514 
Interest expense$86 $43 $129 $ $ $129 
Depreciation and amortization221 103 324   324 
Income tax expense (benefit)24 (43)(19)(2) (21)
Segment income (loss)/Net income189 121 310 (8) 302 
Capital expenditures$488 $362 $850 $ $ $850 
Segment assets7,504 4,164 11,668 14 (176)11,506 
133

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS
Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,493 $544 $2,037 $— $— $2,037 
Interest expense$87 $24 $111 $— $— $111 
Depreciation and amortization217 90 307 — — 307 
Income tax expense (benefit)15 19 34 (4)— 30 
Segment income (loss)/Net Income141 78 219 (15)— 204 
Capital expenditures$486 $362 $848 $— $— $848 
Segment assets6,882 3,892 10,774 29 (29)10,774 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,405 $453 $1,858 $— $— $1,858 
Interest expense$85 $17 $102 $— $— $102 
Depreciation and amortization200 78 278 — — 278 
Income tax expense (benefit)19 26 45 (2)— 43 
Segment income (loss)162 96 258 (6)— 252 
Capital expenditures$548 $286 $834 $— $— $834 
Segment assets6,615 3,380 9,995 32 (2)10,025 
4. REGULATORY MATTERS
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants record regulatory assets and liabilities that result from the ratemaking process. See Note 1 for further information.
134

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy and Progress Energy. See separate tables below for balances by individual registrant.
Duke EnergyProgress Energy
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Regulatory Assets
AROs – coal ash$3,205 $3,408 $1,429 $1,399 
AROs – nuclear and other945 684 884 620 
Deferred fuel and purchased power3,866 1,253 2,060 718 
Accrued pension and OPEB2,336 2,017 759 725 
Storm cost securitized balance, net940 991 720 759 
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 881 937 
Debt fair value adjustment829 884  — 
Storm cost deferrals666 213 559 189 
Hedge costs deferrals378 348 128 137 
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses342 356 42 47 
Retired generation facilities316 357 243 265 
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA288 317 21 21 
Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI)283 311 111 130 
Customer connect project271 242 136 124 
Costs of removal regulatory asset221 107 221 107 
Vacation accrual222 221 43 42 
Incremental COVID-19 expenses210 87 78 28 
CEP deferral190 161  — 
Demand side management (DSM)/Energy efficiency (EE)189 235 188 230 
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts168 139  — 
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 157 165 
Nuclear deferral154 120 64 42 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs121 108  — 
COR settlement120 123 32 32 
Deferred coal ash handling system costs92 90 25 23 
Qualifying facility contract buyouts81 94 81 94 
Amounts due from customers57 85  — 
Propane caverns26 —  — 
Deferred severance charges21 54 7 18 
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104  — 
Other555 426 110 87 
Total regulatory assets18,130 14,637 8,979 6,939 
Less: current portion3,485 2,150 1,833 1,030 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$14,645 $12,487 $7,146 $5,909 
Regulatory Liabilities
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$6,462 $7,199 $2,192 $2,394 
Costs of removal5,151 6,150 2,269 2,955 
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053  — 
Hedge cost deferrals683 364 252 155 
Accrued pension and OPEB211 213  — 
DOE Settlement154 — 154 — 
Provision for rate refunds78 274 28 87 
Amounts to be refunded to customers45 —  — 
Other1,226 1,110 434 453 
Total regulatory liabilities15,048 17,363 5,329 6,044 
Less: current portion1,466 1,211 576 478 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$13,582 $16,152 $4,753 $5,566 
Descriptions of regulatory assets and liabilities summarized in the tables above and below follow. See tables below for recovery and amortization periods at the separate registrants.
AROs coal ash. Represents deferred depreciation and accretion related to the legal obligation to close ash basins. The costs are deferred until recovery treatment has been determined. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
135

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
AROs nuclear and other. Represents regulatory assets or liabilities, including deferred depreciation and accretion, related to legal obligations associated with the future retirement of property, plant and equipment, excluding amounts related to coal ash. The AROs relate primarily to decommissioning nuclear power facilities. The amounts also include certain deferred gains and losses on NDTF investments. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
Deferred fuel and purchased power. Represents certain energy-related costs that are recoverable or refundable as approved by the applicable regulatory body.
Accrued pension and OPEB. Accrued pension and OPEB represent regulatory assets and liabilities related to each of the Duke Energy Registrants’ respective shares of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service cost and credit attributable to Duke Energy’s pension plans and OPEB plans. The regulatory asset or liability is amortized with the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost and credit to net periodic benefit costs for pension and OPEB plans. The accrued pension and OPEB regulatory assets are expected to be recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Storm cost securitized balance, net. Represents the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego (2018 and 2019 events).
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net.Represents the balance associated with Crystal River Unit 3 retirement approved for recovery by the FPSC on September 15, 2015, and the upfront financing costs securitized in 2016 with issuance of the associated bonds. The regulatory asset balance is net of the AFUDC equity portion.
Debt fair value adjustment. Purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of Progress Energy and Piedmont at fair value in connection with the 2012 and 2016 mergers, respectively. Amount is amortized over the life of the related debt.
Storm cost deferrals. Represents deferred incremental costs incurred related to major weather-related events.
Hedge costs deferrals. Amounts relate to unrealized gains and losses on derivatives recorded as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively, until the contracts are settled.
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses. Represents deferred depreciation and operating expenses as well as carrying costs on the portion of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.
Retired generation facilities. Represents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA. Represents deferred costs incurred for the canceled Lee and Harris nuclear projects.
AMI. Represents deferred costs related to the installation of AMI meters and remaining net book value of non-AMI meters to be replaced at Duke Energy Carolinas, net book value of existing meters at Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Ohio and future recovery of net book value of electromechanical meters that have been replaced with AMI meters at Duke Energy Indiana.
Customer connect project. Represents incremental operating expenses and carrying costs on deferred amounts related to the deployment of the new customer information system.
Vacation accrual. Represents vacation entitlement, which is generally recovered in the following year.
Incremental COVID-19 expenses. Representsincremental costs related to ensuring continuity and quality of service in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CEP deferral. Represents deferred depreciation, PISCC and deferred property tax for Duke Energy Ohio Gas capital assets for the Capital Expenditure Program (CEP).
DSM/EE. Deferred costs related to various DSM and EE programs recoverable through various mechanisms.
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts. Represents costs for certain long-dated, fixed quantity forward natural gas supply contracts, which are recoverable through PGA clauses.
NCEMPA deferrals. Represents retail allocated cost deferrals and returns associated with the additional ownership interest in assets acquired from NCEMPA in 2015.
Nuclear deferral. Includes amounts related to levelizing nuclear plant outage costs, which allows for the recognition of nuclear outage expenses over the refueling cycle rather than when the outage occurs, resulting in the deferral of operations and maintenance costs associated with refueling.
Deferred pipeline integrity costs. Represents pipeline integrity management costs in compliance with federal regulations.
COR settlement. Represents approved COR settlements that are being amortized over the average remaining lives, at the time of approval, of the associated assets.
Deferred coal ash handling system costs. Represents deferred depreciation and returns associated with capital assets related to converting the ash handling system from wet to dry.
Qualifying facility contract buyouts. Represents termination payments for regulatory recovery through the capacity clause.
Amounts due from customers. Relates primarily to margin decoupling and IMR recovery mechanisms.
136

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Costs of removal regulatory asset. Represents the excess of spend over funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired, net of certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
Propane Caverns. Represents amounts for costs related to propane inventory, the net book value of remaining assets and decommissioning costs at Duke Energy Ohio.
MGP. Represents remediation costs incurred at former MGP sites and the deferral of costs to be incurred at Duke Energy Ohio's East End and West End sites.
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes. Amounts for all registrants include regulatory liabilities related primarily to impacts from the Tax Act. See Note 24 for additional information. Amounts have no immediate impact on rate base as regulatory assets are offset by deferred tax liabilities.
Costs of removal. Represents funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired. Also includes certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
DOE Settlement. Represents litigation settlement funds received resulting from the DOE’s failure to accept spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste from the Crystal River Unit 3 during 2014-2018 as required under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
Provision for rate refunds. Represents estimated amounts due to customers based on recording interim rates subject to refund.
RESTRICTIONS ON THE ABILITY OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES TO MAKE DIVIDENDS, ADVANCES AND LOANS TO DUKE ENERGY
As a condition to the approval of merger transactions, the NCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, KPSC and IURC imposed conditions on the ability of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont to transfer funds to Duke Energy through loans or advances, as well as restricted amounts available to pay dividends to Duke Energy. Certain subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Parent by obtaining approval of the respective state regulatory commissions. These conditions imposed restrictions on the ability of the public utility subsidiaries to pay cash dividends as discussed below.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also have restrictions imposed by their first mortgage bond indentures, which in certain circumstances, limit their ability to make cash dividends or distributions on common stock. Amounts restricted as a result of these provisions were not material at December 31, 2022.
Additionally, certain other subsidiaries of Duke Energy have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to Duke Energy due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, minimum working capital and tangible net worth requirements.
The restrictions discussed below were not a material amount of Duke Energy's and Progress Energy's net assets at December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Duke Energy Carolinas must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to mergers to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Progress
Duke Energy Progress must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the mergers between Duke Energy and Progress Energy and Duke Energy and Piedmont to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the respective mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without the prior authorization of the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio received FERC and PUCO approval to pay dividends from its equity accounts that are reflective of the amount that it would have in its retained earnings account had push-down accounting for the Cinergy merger not been applied to Duke Energy Ohio’s balance sheet. The conditions include a commitment from Duke Energy Ohio that equity, adjusted to remove the impacts of push-down accounting, will not fall below 30% of total capital.
Duke Energy Kentucky is required to pay dividends solely out of retained earnings and to maintain a minimum of 35% equity in its capital structure.
Duke Energy Indiana
Duke Energy Indiana must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the merger between Duke Energy and Cinergy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded. In addition, Duke Energy Indiana will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without prior authorization of the IURC.
Piedmont
Piedmont must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the acquisition of Piedmont by Duke Energy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
RATE-RELATED INFORMATION
The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, IURC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC approve rates for retail electric and natural gas services within their states. The FERC approves rates for electric sales to wholesale customers served under cost-based rates (excluding Ohio and Indiana), as well as sales of transmission service. The FERC also regulates certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects.
137

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress
Hurricane Ian
In late September and early October 2022, Hurricane Ian inflicted severe damage to the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress territories in North Carolina and South Carolina. Approximately 950,000 customers were impacted. Total estimated operation and maintenance expenses incurred for restoration efforts for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately $100 million, with an additional $9 million in capital investments. Approximately $83 million of the operation and maintenance expenses are deferred in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 ($40 million and $43 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have regulatory tools to recover storm costs including deferral and securitization. These estimates could change as Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress receive additional information on actual costs.
Carbon Plan Proceeding
On October 13, 2021, North Carolina enacted legislation (Energy Solutions for North Carolina or HB 951) that established a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance North Carolina CO2 emission reductions from electric generating facilities in the state through the use of least cost planning while providing for continued reliability and affordable rates for customers. Among other things, HB 951 directed that the NCUC approve an initial carbon plan (Carbon Plan) by December 31, 2022, taking all reasonable steps to achieve a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from public utilities’ electric generating facilities in the state by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and achieve carbon neutrality from electric generating facilities by 2050 while maintaining affordability and reliability for customers. On May 16, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed their proposed Carolinas Carbon Plan (Proposed Plan) with the NCUC.
The NCUC issued an order on December 30, 2022, adopting the first Carbon Plan. The order recognizes the value of an “all-of-the-above” approach to achieving CO2 emission reductions and established a set of near-term procurement and development activities needed to continue progress towards the targeted CO2 reductions, along with the schedule for the future biennial updates to the Carbon Plan. The approved near-term action plan includes procurement and development of solar, storage and hydrogen-capable natural gas generation at levels consistent with the Proposed Plan, along with upgrading key transmission facilities to strengthen the grid, improve resilience for customers and interconnect new solar generation and stakeholder engagement activities for onshore wind generation (in all cases, subject to any further applicable regulatory processes). The order also approved early development activities for long lead-time resources, including new nuclear, pumped-hydro storage and offshore wind transmission development. The NCUC affirmed the utility ownership structure required in HB 951; all new generation facilities or other resources selected by the NCUC to achieve the CO2 emission reductions shall be owned and recovered on a cost-of-service basis by the utilities, with a carveout for 45% of solar and solar plus storage generation to be procured through long-term purchase power agreements with third parties. The order approves continued utilization of the remaining coal-fired generation assets, ensuring that appropriate replacement generating units and associated transmission infrastructure are in service before existing generating units are retired and providing an orderly transition out of coal generation by 2035.
Storm Cost Securitization Legislation
On June 15, 2022, the South Carolina General Assembly unanimously adopted S. 1077 (Act 227) in both the House and Senate and the bill was signed into law on June 17, 2022. The legislation enables the PSCSC to permit the issuance of bonds for the payment of storm costs and the creation of a storm charge for repayment.
On August 5, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a petition with the PSCSC for review and approval of deferred storm costs to be securitized of approximately $223 million. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on or after March 1, 2023. On February 7, 2023, a stipulation was reached with all parties in the proceeding regarding certain items identified through the Office of Regulatory Staff (ORS) audit of storm costs. The final amount for securitization will depend on the outcome of the hearing.Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
138

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$1,391 $1,227 (g)(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(i)
1,614 339 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
614 365 Yes(h)
Storm cost securitized balance, net220 232 2041
Storm cost deferrals
93 22 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
228 171 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
30 31 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
39 54 Yes(b)
Deferred asset – Lee COLA267 296 (b)
AMI139 140 Yes(b)
Customer connect project62 66 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual84 83 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses127 51 Yes(b)
Nuclear deferral90 78 2024
COR settlement88 91 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs67 67 Yes(b)
Other235 166 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,388 3,479 
Less: current portion1,095 544 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,293 $2,935 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(d)
$2,475 $2,785 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
1,769 2,009 Yes(f)
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053 (b)
Hedge cost deferrals
350 209 (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
44 44 Yes(h)
Provision for rate refunds50 124 Yes(b)
Other587 461 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities6,313 7,685 
Less: current portion530 487 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$5,783 $7,198 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)     Included in rate base.
(d)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(i)    Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in May 2022 for recovery of $327 million, which included deferrals through January 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through August 2023. The next filing will be made in the first quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in July 2022 for recovery of $79 million, which included deferrals through May 2022. The amount is expected to be recovered through September 2023. The next filing will be made in the third quarter of 2023.
2023 North Carolina Rate Case
On January 19, 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The PBR Application includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $501 million in Year 1, $172 million in Year 2 and $150 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $823 million or 15.7% by early 2026. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Carolinas plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on September 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by January 1, 2024. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
139

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Oconee Nuclear Station Subsequent License Renewal
On June 7, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a subsequent license renewal (SLR) application for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to renew ONS’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The SLR would extend operations of the facility from 60 to 80 years. The current licenses for units 1 and 2 expire in 2033 and the license for unit 3 expires in 2034. By a Federal Register Notice dated July 28, 2021, the NRC provided a 60-day comment period for persons whose interest may be affected by the issuance of a subsequent renewed license for ONS to file a request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene. On September 27, 2021, Beyond Nuclear and Sierra Club (Petitioners) filed a Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene (Hearing Request) and a Petition for Waiver. The Hearing Request proposed three contentions and claimed that Duke Energy Carolinas did not satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, or the NRC’s NEPA-implementing regulations. Following Duke Energy Carolinas' answer and the Petitioners' reply, on February 11, 2022, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) issued its decision on the Hearing Request and found that the Petitioners failed to establish that the proposed contentions are litigable. The ASLB also denied the Petitioners' Petition for Waiver and terminated the proceeding.
On February 24, 2022, the NRC issued a decision in the SLR appeal related to Florida Power and Light's Turkey Point nuclear generating station in Florida. The NRC ruled that the NRC’s license renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) does not apply to SLR because the GEIS does not address SLR. The decision overturned a 2020 NRC decision that found the GEIS applies to SLR. Although Turkey Point is not owned or operated by a Duke Energy Registrant, the NRC’s order applies to all SLR applicants, including ONS. The NRC order also indicated no subsequent renewed licenses will be issued until the NRC staff has completed an adequate NEPA review for each application. On April 5, 2022, the NRC approved a 24-month rulemaking plan that will enable the NRC staff to complete an adequate NEPA review. Although an SLR applicant may wait until the rulemaking is completed, the NRC also noted that an applicant may submit a supplement to its environmental report providing information on environmental impacts during the SLR period prior to the rulemaking being completed. On November 7, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a supplement to its environmental report addressing environmental impacts during the SLR period. On December 19, 2022, the NRC published a notice in the Federal Register that the NRC will conduct a limited scoping process to gather additional information necessary to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental impacts at ONS during the SLR period. The NRC received comments from the EPA and the Petitioners and these comments identify eighteen potential impacts that should be considered by the NRC in the EIS, which include, but are not limited to, climate change and flooding, environmental justice, severe accidents, and external events. Currently, the NRC expects to publish a draft EIS in October 2023.
On December 19, 2022, the NRC issued the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the safety portion of the SLR application. The NRC determined Duke Energy Carolinas met the requirements of the applicable regulations and identified actions that have been taken or will be taken to manage the effects of aging and address time-limited analyses. Duke Energy Carolinas and the NRC met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) on February 2, 2023, to discuss issues regarding the SER and SLR application, after which the ACRS will issue a report discussing the result of its review.
Although the NRC’s GEIS applicability decision will delay completion of the SLR proceeding, Duke Energy Carolinas does not believe it changes the probability that the ONS subsequent renewed licenses will ultimately be issued, although Duke Energy Carolinas cannot guarantee the outcome of the license application process.
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. New depreciation rates were implemented for all of the nuclear facilities during the second quarter of 2021. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these additional relicensing proceedings.
140

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Progress
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$1,418 $1,389 (g)(b)
AROs – nuclear and other869 613 (c)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(l)
705 303 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(d)
417 351 Yes(j)
Storm cost securitized balance, net720 759 2041
Storm cost deferrals
234 170 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals
55 60 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses42 47 Yes2054
Retired generation facilities
149 171 Yes(b)
Deferred asset - Harris COLA21 21 (b)
AMI81 92 Yes(b)
Customer connect project
54 57 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual
43 42 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses78 28 Yes(b)
DSM/EE(d)
180 218 (h)(h)
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 (f)2042
Nuclear deferral64 42 2024
COR settlement32 32 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs25 23 Yes(b)
Other70 68 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,414 4,651 
Less: current portion690 533 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,724 $4,118 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(k)
$1,559 $1,695 (b)
Costs of removal(d)
2,269 2,955 Yes(i)
Hedge cost deferrals252 155 (b)
Provision for rate refunds28 87 Yes(b)
Other344 357 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities4,452 5,249 
Less: current portion332 381 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$4,120 $4,868 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Recovery period for costs related to nuclear facilities runs through the decommissioning period of each unit.
(d)    Included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    South Carolina retail allocated costs are earning a return.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(i)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(j)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(k)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(l)    Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in August 2022 for recovery of $251 million, which included deferrals through June 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through November 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in April 2022 for recovery of $44 million, which included deferrals through February 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through June 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023.
141

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2022 North Carolina Rate Case
On October 6, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The rate request before the NCUC includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $326 million in Year 1, $151 million in Year 2 and $138 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $615 million or 16% by late 2025. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Progress plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on June 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by October 1, 2023. The evidentiary hearing has been scheduled to begin on May 1, 2023. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On September 1, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the PSCSC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. On January 12, 2023, Duke Energy Progress and the ORS, as well as other consumer, environmental, and industrial intervening parties, filed a comprehensive Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement resolving all issues in the base rate proceeding. The major components of the stipulation include:
A $52 million annual customer rate increase prior to the reduction from the accelerated return to customers of federal unprotected Property, Plant and Equipment related EDIT. After extending the remaining EDIT giveback to customers to 33 months, the net annual retail rate increase is approximately $36 million.
ROE of 9.6% based upon a capital structure of 52.43% equity and 47.57% debt.
Continuation of deferral treatment of coal ash basin closure costs. Supports an amortization period for remaining coal ash closure costs in this rate case of seven years. Duke Energy Progress agreed not to seek recovery of approximately $50 million of deferred coal ash expenditures related to retired sites in this rate case (South Carolina retail allocation).
Accepts the 2021 Depreciation Study as proposed in this case, as adjusted for certain recommendations from ORS and includes accelerated retirement dates for certain coal units as originally proposed.
Establishment of a storm reserve to help offset the costs of major storms.
The PSCSC held a hearing on January 17, 2023, to consider evidence supporting the stipulation and unanimously voted to approve the comprehensive agreement on February 9, 2023. The PSCSC voted to allow Duke Energy Progress to implement new customer rates by April 1, 2023. A final written order is due from the PSCSC by March 1, 2023.
FERC Return on Equity Complaint
On October 16, 2020, North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC) filed a complaint at the FERC against Duke Energy Progress pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), alleging that the 11% stated ROE component in the demand formula rate in the Power Supply and Coordination Agreement between NCEMC and Duke Energy Progress is unjust and unreasonable. On June 16, 2022, Duke Energy Progress submitted to the FERC an Offer of Settlement and Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement) between NCEMC and Duke Energy Progress. The Settlement Agreement provides for an ROE of 10%, effective January 1, 2022, among other contract modifications. On November 7, 2022, the FERC approved the Settlement Agreement.
142

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Florida
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$11 $10 (b)
AROs – nuclear and other
15 (b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(h)
1,355 415 (f)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
342 374 Yes(g)
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 2036
Storm cost deferrals(c)
325 19 (f)(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
73 77 Yes2038
Retired generation facilities(c)
94 94 Yes2044
AMI(c)
30 38 Yes2032
Customer connect project(c)
82 67 Yes2037
Costs of removal regulatory asset(c)
221 107 (d)(b)
Qualifying facility contract buyouts(c)
81 94 Yes2034
Other55 49 (d)(b)
Total regulatory assets3,565 2,288 
Less: current portion1,143 497 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$2,422 $1,791 
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(c)
$633 $699 (b)
DOE Settlement154 — 
Other90 97 (d)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities877 796 
Less: current portion244 98 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$633 $698 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(e)    Earns a debt return/interest once collections begin.
(f)    Earns commercial paper rate.
(g)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(h)    Duke Energy Florida submitted a fuel filing to the FPSC in January 2023 for recovery of $795 million, which included the 2022 actual under-recovery of $1.2 billion, offset by projected declining fuel costs in 2023 due to lower natural gas prices. The expected recovery period is April 2023 through March 2024.
2021 Settlement Agreement
On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed a Settlement Agreement (the “2021 Settlement”) with the FPSC. The parties to the 2021 Settlement include Duke Energy Florida, the Office of Public Counsel (OPC), the Florida Industrial Power Users Group, White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. d/b/a PCS Phosphate and NUCOR Steel Florida, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”).
Pursuant to the 2021 Settlement, the Parties agreed to a base rate stay-out provision that expires year-end 2024; however, Duke Energy Florida is allowed an increase to its base rates of an incremental $67 million in 2022, $49 million in 2023 and $79 million in 2024, subject to adjustment in the event of tax reform during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023. The Parties also agreed to an ROE band of 8.85% to 10.85% with a midpoint of 9.85% based on a capital structure of 53% equity and 47% debt. The ROE band can be increased by 25 basis points if the average 30-year U.S. Treasury rate increases 50 basis points or more over a six-month period in which case the midpoint ROE would rise from 9.85% to 10.10%. On July 25, 2022, this provision was triggered. Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on August 12, 2022, to increase the ROE effective August 2022 with a base rate increase effective January 1, 2023. The FPSC approved this request on October 4, 2022. The 2021 Settlement Agreement also provided that Duke Energy Florida will be able to retain the $173 million retail portion of the expected DOE award from its lawsuit to recover spent nuclear fuel to mitigate customer rates over the term of the 2021 Settlement. In return, Duke Energy Florida is permitted to recognize the $173 million into earnings through the approved settlement period. The full amount of the $173 million is expected to be recognized between the years of 2023 and 2024, while also remaining within the approved ROE band. Duke Energy Florida settled the DOE lawsuit and received payment of approximately $180 million on June 15, 2022, of which the retail portion was approximately $154 million. The 2021 Settlement authorizes Duke Energy Florida to collect the difference between $173 million and the $154 million retail portion of the amount received through the capacity cost recovery clause.
143

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The 2021 Settlement also contained a provision to recover or flow-back the effects of tax law changes. As a result of the IRA enacted on August 16, 2022, Duke Energy Florida is eligible for PTCs associated with solar facilities placed in service beginning in January 2022. Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on October 17, 2022, to reduce base rates effective January 1, 2023, by $56 million to flow back the expected 2023 PTCs and to flow back the expected 2022 PTCs via an adjustment to the capacity cost recovery clause. On December 14, 2022, the FPSC issued an order approving Duke Energy Florida’s petition. See Note 24 for additional information on the IRA.
In addition to these terms, the 2021 Settlement contained provisions related to the accelerated depreciation of Crystal River Units 4-5, the approval of approximately $1 billion in future investments in new cost-effective solar power, the implementation of a new Electric Vehicle Charging Station Program and the deferral and recovery of costs in connection with the implementation of Duke Energy Florida’s Vision Florida program, which explores various emerging non-carbon emitting generation technology, distributed technologies and resiliency projects, among other things. The 2021 Settlement also resolved remaining unrecovered storm costs for Hurricane Michael and Hurricane Dorian.
The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021, issuing an order on June 4, 2021. Revised customer rates became effective January 1, 2022, with subsequent base rate increases effective January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024.
Clean Energy Connection
On July 1, 2020, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC for approval of a voluntary solar program. The program consists of 10 new solar generating facilities with combined capacity of approximately 750 MW. The program allows participants to support cost-effective solar development in Florida by paying a subscription fee based on per kilowatt subscriptions and receiving a credit on their bill based on the actual generation associated with their portion of the solar portfolio. The estimated cost of the 10 new solar generation facilities is approximately $1 billion and the projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2024. This investment will be included in base rates offset by the revenue from the subscription fees and the credits will be included for recovery in the fuel cost recovery clause. The FPSC approved the program in January 2021.
On February 24, 2021, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) filed a notice of appeal of the FPSC’s order approving the Clean Energy Connection to the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida heard the oral argument on February 9, 2022. On May 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Florida issued an order remanding the case back to the FPSC so that the FPSC can amend its order to better address some of the arguments raised by LULAC. On September 23, 2022, the FPSC issued a revised order and submitted it on September 26, 2022, to the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida requested that the parties file supplemental briefs regarding the revised order, which were filed February 6, 2023. The FPSC approval order remains in effect pending the outcome of the appeal. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Storm Protection Plan
On April 11, 2022, Duke Energy Florida filed a Storm Protection Plan for approval with the FPSC. The plan, which covers investments for the 2023-2032 time frame, reflects approximately $7 billion of capital investment in transmission and distribution meant to strengthen its infrastructure, reduce outage times associated with extreme weather events, reduce restoration costs and improve overall service reliability. The evidentiary hearing began on August 2, 2022. On October 4, 2022, the FPSC voted to approve Duke Energy Florida's plan with one modification to remove the transmission loop radially fed program, representing a reduction of approximately $80 million over the 10-year period starting in 2025. On December 9, 2022, the Office of Public Counsel filed a notice of appeal of this order to the Florida Supreme Court. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Hurricane Ian
On September 28, 2022, much of Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was impacted by Hurricane Ian, which caused significant damage resulting in more than 1.1 million outages. Duke Energy Florida's December 31, 2022 Consolidated Balance Sheets include an estimate of approximately $353 million related to deferred Hurricane Ian storm costs, consistent with the FPSC's storm rule, in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets. After depleting any existing storm reserves, which were approximately $107 million before Hurricane Ian, Duke Energy Florida is permitted to petition the FPSC for recovery of additional incremental operation and maintenance costs resulting from the storm and to replenish the retail customer storm reserve to approximately $132 million. Duke Energy Florida filed its petition for cost recovery of various storms, including Hurricane Ian, and replenishment of the storm reserve on January 23, 2023, seeking recovery of $442 million, for recovery over 12 months beginning with the first billing cycle in April 2023. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
144

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Ohio
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Ohio's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$ $33 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power54 38 2023
Accrued pension and OPEB129 133 (e)
Storm cost deferrals
14 2023
Hedge costs deferrals
2 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
15 16 Yes2083
AMI18 24 (b)
Customer connect project54 41 (b)
CEP deferral190 161 Yes(b)
Deferred pipeline integrity costs28 24 Yes(b)
Propane caverns26 — (b)
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104 (b)
Other154 126 (b)
Total regulatory assets684 707 
Less: current portion103 72 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$581 $635 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$496 $602 (b)
Costs of removal9 39 (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB21 21 (e)
Provision for rate refunds— 61 
Other107 78 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities633 801 
Less: current portion99 62 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$534 $739 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Duke Energy Ohio Electric Base Rate Case
Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO an electric distribution base rate case application on October 1, 2021, with supporting testimony filed on October 15, 2021, requesting an increase in electric distribution base rates of approximately $55 million and an ROE of 10.3%. This is an approximate 3.3% average increase in the customer's total bill across all customer classes. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Ohio's last electric distribution base rate case in 2017. Duke Energy Ohio is also seeking to adjust the caps on its Distribution Capital Investment Rider (DCI Rider). The Staff of the PUCO (Staff) report was issued on May 19, 2022, recommending an increase in electric distribution base rates of $2 million to $15 million with an ROE range of 8.84% to 9.85%. On September 19, 2022, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Stipulation and Recommendation with the PUCO, which includes an increase in overall electric distribution base rates of approximately $23 million and an ROE of 9.5%. The stipulation is among all but one party to the proceeding. The PUCO issued an order on December 14, 2022, approving the Stipulation without material modification. Rates went into effect on January 3, 2023. The Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) filed an application for rehearing on January 13, 2023. On February 8, 2023, the Commission granted the OCC's application for rehearing for further consideration.Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
145

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery
In response to changes in Ohio law that eliminated Ohio's energy efficiency mandates, the PUCO issued an order on February 26, 2020, directing utilities to wind down their demand-side management programs by September 30, 2020, and to terminate the programs by December 31, 2020. Duke Energy Ohio took the following actions:
On March 27, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for rehearing seeking clarification on the final true up and reconciliation process after 2020. On November 18, 2020, the PUCO issued an order replacing the cost cap previously imposed upon Duke Energy Ohio with a cap on shared savings recovery. On December 18, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an additional application for rehearing challenging, among other things, the imposition of the cap on shared savings. On January 13, 2021, the application for rehearing was granted for further consideration.
On October 9, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to implement a voluntary energy efficiency program portfolio to commence on January 1, 2021. The application proposed a mechanism for recovery of program costs and a benefit associated with avoided transmission and distribution costs. This application remains under review.
On November 18, 2020, the PUCO issued an order directing all utilities to set their energy efficiency riders to zero effective January 1, 2021, and to file a separate application for final reconciliation of all energy efficiency costs prior to December 31, 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, Duke Energy Ohio suspended its energy efficiency programs.
On June 14, 2021, the PUCO requested each utility to file by July 15, 2021, a proposal to reestablish low-income programs through December 31, 2021. Duke Energy Ohio filed its application on July 14, 2021.
On February 23, 2022, the PUCO issued its Fifth Entry on Rehearing that 1) affirmed its reduction in Duke Energy Ohio's shared savings cap; 2) denied rehearing/clarification regarding lost distribution revenues and shared savings recovery for periods after December 31, 2020; and 3) directed Duke Energy Ohio to submit an updated application with exhibits.
On March 25, 2022, Duke Energy Ohio filed its Amended Application consistent with the PUCO's order.
Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Duke Energy Ohio Natural Gas Base Rate Case
Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO a natural gas base rate case application on June 30, 2022, with supporting testimony filed on July 14, 2022, requesting an increase in natural gas base rates of approximately $49 million and an ROE of 10.3%. This is an approximate 5.6% average increase in the customer's total bill across all customer classes. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Ohio's last natural gas base rate case in 2012. Duke Energy Ohio is also seeking to adjust the caps on its Capital Expenditure Program Rider (CEP Rider). The Staff of the PUCO (Staff) report was issued on December 21, 2022, recommending an increase in natural gas base rates of $24 million to $36 million, with an equity ratio of 52% and an ROE range of 9.03% to 10.04%. A procedural schedule was issued on December 22, 2022, scheduling the evidentiary hearing to commence on March 28, 2023. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Natural Gas Pipeline Extension
Duke Energy Ohio installed a new natural gas pipeline (the Central Corridor Project) in its Ohio service territory to increase system reliability and enable the retirement of older infrastructure. Construction of the pipeline extension was completed and placed in service on March 14, 2022, with a total cost of approximately $170 million (excluding overheads and AFUDC).
MGP Cost Recovery
In an order issued in 2013, the PUCO approved Duke Energy Ohio's deferral and recovery of costs related to environmental remediation at two sites (East End and West End) that housed former MGP operations. Duke Energy Ohio made annual applications with the PUCO to recover its incremental remediation costs consistent with the PUCO’s directive in Duke Energy Ohio’s 2012 natural gas base rate case.
A Stipulation and Recommendation was filed jointly by Duke Energy Ohio, the Staff, the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Ohio Energy Group on August 31, 2021, which was approved without modification by the PUCO on April 20, 2022. The Stipulation and Recommendation resolved all open issues regarding MGP remediation costs incurred between 2013 and 2019, Duke Energy Ohio’s request for additional deferral authority beyond 2019 and the pending issues related to the Tax Act described below as it related to Duke Energy Ohio’s natural gas operations. As a result of the approval of the Stipulation and Recommendation, Duke Energy Ohio recognized pretax charges of approximately $15 million to Operating revenues, regulated natural gas and $58 million to Operation, maintenance and other and a tax benefit of $72 million to Income Tax (Benefit) Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Stipulation and Recommendation further acknowledged Duke Energy Ohio’s ability to file a request for additional deferral authority in the future related to environmental remediation of any MGP impacts in the Ohio River, if necessary, subject to specific conditions. On June 15, 2022, the PUCO granted the rehearing requests of Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. (IGS) and The Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA), which were filed on May 20, 2022, for further consideration. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
146

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Tax Act – Ohio
On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to change its base rate tariffs and establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for natural gas customers. The new rider would flow through to customers the benefit of the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, all future benefits of the lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in prior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules would be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a 10-year period. An evidentiary hearing occurred on August 7, 2019. The Stipulation and Recommendation filed on August 31, 2021, and approved on April 20, 2022, disclosed in the MGP Cost Recovery matter above, resolves the outstanding issues in this proceeding by providing customers a one-time bill credit for the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, through June 1, 2022, and reducing base rates going forward. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law through a new rider. Deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules were written off. The commission granted the rehearing requests of IGS and RESA for further consideration. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Midwest Propane Caverns
Duke Energy Ohio used propane stored in caverns to meet peak demand during winter for several decades. Once the Central Corridor Project was complete and placed in service, the propane peaking facilities were no longer necessary and were retired. On October 7, 2021, Duke Energy Ohio requested deferral treatment of the property, plant and equipment as well as costs related to propane inventory and decommissioning costs. On January 6, 2022, the Staff issued a report recommending deferral authority for costs related to propane inventory and decommissioning costs, but not for the net book value of the remaining plant assets. As a result of the Staff's report, Duke Energy Ohio recorded a $19 million charge to Impairment of assets and other charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2021. A Stipulation and Recommendation was filed jointly by Duke Energy Ohio and the Staff on April 27, 2022, recommending, among other things, approval of deferral treatment of a portion of the net book value of the property, plant and equipment prior to the 2021 impairment at the time of the next natural gas base rate case, excluding operations and maintenance savings, decommissioning costs not to exceed $7 million and costs related to propane inventory. The Stipulation and Recommendation states that Duke Energy Ohio will seek recovery of the deferral through its next natural gas base rate case proceeding with a proposed amortization period of at least 10 years and include an independent engineering study analyzing the necessity and prudency of the incremental investments made at the facilities since March 31, 2012. Duke Energy Ohio will not seek a return on the deferred amounts. An evidentiary hearing was held on September 8, 2022. On October 5, 2022, the PUCO issued an order approving the Stipulation and Recommendation as filed. As a result of the order, Duke Energy Ohio recorded a reversal of $12 million to Impairment of assets and other charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Kentucky Electric Base Rate Case
On December 1, 2022, Duke Energy Kentucky filed a rate case with the KPSC requesting an annualized increase in electric base rates of approximately $75 million and an ROE of 10.35%. This is an overall increase in rates of approximately 17.8%. The request for rate increase is driven by capital investments to strengthen the electricity generation and delivery systems along with adjusted depreciation rates for the East Bend and Woodsdale generation stations to support the energy transition. Duke Energy Kentucky is also requesting new programs and tariff updates, including a voluntary community-based renewable subscription program and two EV charging programs. A procedural schedule was issued on December 19, 2022, scheduling the evidentiary hearing for May 9, 2023. New rates are anticipated to go into effect around July 15, 2023. Duke Energy Kentucky cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
147

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Indiana
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Indiana's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$385 $749 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power138 158 2023
Accrued pension and OPEB214 222 (e)
Hedge costs deferrals
20 35 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
255 262 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
34 38 Yes2030
AMI15 17 2031
Customer connect project19 11 (b)
Other44 63 (b)
Total regulatory assets1,124 1,555 
Less: current portion249 277 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$875 $1,278 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$840 $908 (b)
Costs of removal531 575 (d)
Hedge cost deferrals81 — (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB104 113 (e)
Other85 96 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,641 1,692 
Less: current portion187 127 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,454 $1,565 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Refunded over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
2019 Indiana Rate Case
On July 2, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $395 million. The rebuttal case, filed on December 4, 2019, updated the requested revenue requirement to result in a 15.6% or $396 million average retail rate increase, including the impacts of the utility receipts tax. On June 29, 2020, the IURC issued an order in the rate case approving a revenue increase of $146 million before certain adjustments and ratemaking refinements. The order approved Duke Energy Indiana's requested forecasted rate base of $10.2 billion as of December 31, 2020, including the Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Plant. The IURC reduced Duke Energy Indiana's request by slightly more than $200 million, when accounting for the utility receipts tax and other adjustments. Approximately 50% of the reduction was due to a prospective change in depreciation and use of regulatory asset for the end-of-life inventory at retired generating plants, approximately 20% was due to the approved ROE of 9.7% versus the requested ROE of 10.4% and approximately 20% was related to miscellaneous earnings neutral adjustments. Step one rates were estimated to be approximately 75% of the total and became effective on July 30, 2020. Step two rates estimated to be the remaining 25% of the total rate increase were approved on July 28, 2021, and implemented in August 2021.
Several groups appealed the IURC order to the Indiana Court of Appeals. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the IURC decision on May 13, 2021. However, upon appeal by the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and the Duke Industrial Group on March 10, 2022, the Indiana Supreme Court found that the IURC erred in allowing Duke Energy Indiana to recover coal ash costs incurred before the IURC’s rate case order in June 2020. The Indiana Supreme Court found that allowing Duke Energy Indiana to recover coal ash costs incurred between rate cases that exceeded the amount built into base rates violated the prohibition against retroactive ratemaking. The IURC’s order has been remanded to the IURC for additional proceedings consistent with the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion. As a result of the court's opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized pretax charges of approximately $211 million to Impairment of assets and other charges and $46 million to Operating revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana filed a request for rehearing with the Supreme Court on April 11, 2022, which the court denied on May 26, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana filed its testimony in the remand proceeding on August 18, 2022. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin March 3, 2023. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
148

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2020 Indiana Coal Ash ImpoundmentsRecovery Case
In Duke Energy Indiana’s 2019 rate case, the IURC also opened a subdocket for post-2018 coal ash related expenditures. Duke Energy Indiana filed testimony on April 15, 2020, in the coal ash subdocket requesting recovery for the post-2018 coal ash basin closure costs for plans that have been approved by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) as well as continuing deferral, with carrying costs, on the balance. An evidentiary hearing was held on September 14, 2020. Briefing was completed by mid-September 2021. On November 3, 2021, the IURC issued an order allowing recovery for post-2018 coal ash basin closure costs for the plans that have been approved by IDEM, as well as continuing deferral, with carrying costs, on the balance. The OUCC and the Duke Industrial Group appealed. The Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion on February 21, 2023, reversing the IURC's order to the extent that it allowed Duke Energy Indiana to recover federally mandated costs incurred prior to the IURC's November 3, 2021 order. In addition, the court found that any costs incurred pre-petition to determine federally mandated compliance options were not specifically authorized by the statute and should also be disallowed. Duke Energy Indiana is assessing its appellate options and must file a petition to transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court by April 7, 2023. As a result of the court's opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized a pretax charge of approximately $175 million to Impairment of assets and other charges for the year ended December 31, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
TDSIC 2.0
On November 23, 2021, Duke Energy Indiana filed for approval of the Transmission, Distribution, Storage Improvement Charge 2.0 investment plan for 2023-2028 (TDSIC 2.0). On June 15, 2022, the IURC approved, without modification, TDSIC 2.0, which includes approximately $2 billion in transmission and distribution investments selected to improve customer reliability, harden and improve resiliency of the grid, enable expansion of renewable and distributed energy projects and encourage economic development. In addition, the IURC set up a subdocket to consider the targeted economic development project, which the IURC approved on March 2, 2022. On July 15, 2022, the OUCC filed a notice of appeal to the Indiana Court of Appeals in Duke Energy Indiana’s TDSIC 2.0 proceeding. An appellant brief was filed on October 28, 2022, and Duke Energy Indiana filed its responsive brief on December 28, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Piedmont
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Piedmont's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – nuclear and other$27 $22 (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
119 82 (g)
Vacation accrual12 12 2023
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts(f)
168 139 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs(c)
93 84 2025
Amounts due from customers57 85 (e)(b)
Other35 33 (b)
Total regulatory assets511 457 
Less: current portion119 141 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$392 $316 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$459 $510 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
573 572 (d)
Other66 32 (e)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,098 1,114 
Less: current portion74 56 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,024 $1,058 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(f)    Balance will fluctuate with changes in the market. Current contracts extend into 2031.
(g)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On April 1, 2022, Piedmont filed an application with the PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $7 million, which represents an approximate 3.4% increase in retail revenues. An evidentiary hearing was held on August 15, 2022. On September 15, 2022, the PSCSC delivered its decision, which included an ROE of 9.3% and a capital structure of 52.2% equity and 47.8% debt and issued its final order on October 6, 2022. Revised customer rates became effective in October 2022 and resulted in a rate decrease for retail customers of approximately $1 million.
149

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Tennessee Annual Review Mechanism
On October 10, 2022, the TPUC approved Piedmont’s petition to adopt an Annual Review Mechanism (ARM) as allowed by Tennessee law. Under the ARM, Piedmont will adjust rates annually to achieve its allowed 9.80% ROE over the upcoming year and to true up any variance between its allowed ROE and actual ROE from the prior calendar year. The initial year subject to the true up is 2022, and the initial rate adjustments request will be filed in May 2023 for rates effective October 1, 2023.
OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP pipeline) was planned to be an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline running from West Virginia to North Carolina. Duke Energy indirectly owns a 47% interest, which is accounted for as an equity method investment through its Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment.
As a result of the uncertainty created by various legal rulings, the potential impact on the cost and schedule for the project, the ongoing legal challenges and the risk of additional legal challenges and delays through the construction period and Dominion’s decision to sell substantially all of its gas transmission and storage segment assets, Duke Energy's Board of Directors and management decided that it was not prudent to continue to invest in the project. On July 5, 2020, Duke Energy and Dominion announced the cancellation of the ACP pipeline project.
As part of the pretax charges to earnings of approximately $2.1 billion recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020, within Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates on the Duke Energy Consolidated Statements of Operations, Duke Energy established liabilities related to the cancellation of the ACP pipeline project. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. At December 31, 2022, there is $59 million and $47 million within Other Current Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, in the Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment. The liabilities represent Duke Energy's obligation of approximately $106 million to satisfy remaining ARO requirements to restore construction sites.
See Notes 8 and 13 for additional information regarding this transaction.
Potential Coal Plant Retirements
The Subsidiary Registrants periodically file IRPs with their state regulatory commissions. The IRPs provide a view of forecasted energy needs over a long term (10 to 20 years) and options being considered to meet those needs. IRPs filed by the Subsidiary Registrants included planning assumptions to potentially retire certain coal-fired generating facilities in North Carolina and Indiana earlier than their current estimated useful lives. The NCUC concluded in its Carbon Plan order that the projected retirements dates presented by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress in their Carbon Plan for coal-fired generating facilities were reasonable for planning purposes and further directed that appropriate steps be taken to optimally retire the coal fleet according to such schedule. Duke Energy continues to evaluate the potential need to retire these coal-fired generating facilities earlier than the current estimated useful lives and plans to seek regulatory recovery for amounts that would not be otherwise recovered when any of these assets are retired.
The table below contains the net carrying value of generating facilities planned for retirement or included in recent IRPs or Carbon Plan as evaluated for potential retirement. Dollar amounts in the table below are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022, and exclude capitalized asset retirement costs.
Remaining Net
CapacityBook Value
(in MW)(in millions)
Duke Energy Carolinas
Allen Steam Station Unit 1(a)
167 $10 
Allen Steam Station Unit 5(b)
259 233 
Cliffside Unit 5(b)
546 344 
Marshall Units 1-2(b)
760428
Duke Energy Progress
Mayo Unit 1(b)
713 639 
Roxboro Units 3-4(b)
1,409 425 
Duke Energy Florida
Crystal River Units 4-5(c)
1,442 1,549 
Duke Energy Indiana
Gibson Units 1-5(d)
2,845 2,043 
Cayuga Units 1-2(d)
1,005 622 
Total Duke Energy9,146 $6,293 
(a)    As part of the 2015 resolution of a lawsuit involving alleged New Source Review violations, Duke Energy Carolinas must retire Allen Steam Station Unit 1 by December 31, 2024.
(b)    These units were included in the IRP filed by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress in South Carolina on September 1, 2020, and in the Carbon Plan adopted by the NCUC in December 2022. The long-term energy options considered could result in retirement of these units earlier than their current estimated useful lives.
150

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
(c)    On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed the 2021 Settlement agreement with the FPSC, which proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates for Duke Energy Florida's last two coal-fired generating facilities, Crystal River Units 4-5, eight years ahead of schedule in 2034 rather than in 2042. The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021. The remaining net book value reflected in the table above excludes $200 million of accelerated deprecation collected from retail customers pursuant to Duke Energy Florida's 2017 Settlement.
(d)    The rate case filed July 2, 2019, included proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates from 2026 to 2038. The depreciation rates reflecting these updated retirement dates were approved by the IURC as part of the rate case order issued on June 29, 2020.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
INSURANCE
General Insurance
The Duke Energy Registrants have insurance and reinsurance coverage either directly or through indemnification from Duke Energy’s captive insurance company, Bison, and its affiliates, consistent with companies engaged in similar commercial operations with similar type properties. The Duke Energy Registrants’ coverage includes (i) commercial general liability coverage for liabilities arising to third parties for bodily injury and property damage; (ii) workers’ compensation; (iii) automobile liability coverage; and (iv) property coverage for all real and personal property damage. Real and personal property damage coverage excludes electric transmission and distribution lines, but includes damages arising from boiler and machinery breakdowns, earthquakes, flood damage and extra expense, but not outage or replacement power coverage. All coverage is subject to certain deductibles or retentions, sublimits, exclusions, terms and conditions common for companies with similar types of operations. The Duke Energy Registrants self-insure their electric transmission and distribution lines against loss due to storm damage and other natural disasters. As discussed further in Note 4, Duke Energy Florida maintains a storm damage reserve and has a regulatory mechanism to recover the cost of named storms on an expedited basis.
The cost of the Duke Energy Registrants’ coverage can fluctuate from year to year reflecting claims history and conditions of the insurance and reinsurance markets.
In the event of a loss, terms and amounts of insurance and reinsurance available might not be adequate to cover claims and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered by other sources, could have a material effect on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Each company is responsible to the extent losses may be excluded or exceed limits of the coverage available.
Nuclear Insurance
Duke Energy Carolinas owns and operates McGuire and Oconee and operates and has a partial ownership interest in Catawba. McGuire and Catawba each have two reactors. Oconee has three reactors. The other joint owners of Catawba reimburse Duke Energy Carolinas for certain expenses associated with nuclear insurance per the Catawba joint owner agreements.
Duke Energy Progress owns and operates Robinson, Brunswick and Harris. Robinson and Harris each have one reactor. Brunswick has two reactors.
Duke Energy Florida owns Crystal River Unit 3, which permanently ceased operation in 2013 and achieved a SAFSTOR condition in July 2019. On October 1, 2020, Crystal River Unit 3 changed decommissioning strategies from SAFSTOR to DECON.
In the event of a loss, terms and amounts of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered by other sources, could have a material effect on Duke Energy Carolinas’, Duke Energy Progress’ and Duke Energy Florida’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Each company is responsible to the extent losses may be excluded or exceed limits of the coverage available.
Nuclear Liability Coverage
The Price-Anderson Act requires owners of nuclear reactors to provide for public nuclear liability protection per nuclear incident up to a maximum total financial protection liability. The maximum total financial protection liability, which is approximately $13.7 billion, is subject to change every five years for inflation and for the number of licensed reactors. Total nuclear liability coverage consists of a combination of private primary nuclear liability insurance coverage and a mandatory industry risk-sharing program to provide for excess nuclear liability coverage above the maximum reasonably available private primary coverage. The U.S. Congress could impose revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry to pay claims.
Primary Liability Insurance
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have purchased the maximum reasonably available private primary nuclear liability insurance as required by law, which is $450 million per station. Duke Energy Florida has purchased $100 million primary nuclear liability insurance for Crystal River in compliance with the law.
Excess Liability Program
This program provides $13.2 billion of coverage per incident through the Price-Anderson Act’s mandatory industrywide excess secondary financial protection program of risk pooling. This amount is the product of potential cumulative retrospective premium assessments of $138 million times the current 96 licensed commercial nuclear reactors in the U.S. Under this program, operating unit licensees could be assessed retrospective premiums to compensate for public nuclear liability damages in the event of a nuclear incident at any licensed facility in the U.S. Retrospective premiums may be assessed at a rate not to exceed $20.5 million per year per licensed reactor for each incident. The assessment may be subject to state premium taxes.
151

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Property and Accidental Outage Coverage
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are members of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), an industry mutual insurance company, which provides property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning insurance for each station for losses resulting from damage to its nuclear plants, either due to accidents or acts of terrorism. Additionally, NEIL provides accidental outage coverage for losses in the event of a major accidental outage at an insured nuclear station.
Pursuant to regulations of the NRC, each company’s property damage insurance policies provide that all proceeds from such insurance be applied, first, to place the plant in a safe and stable condition after a qualifying accident and second, to decontaminate the plant before any proceeds can be used for decommissioning, plant repair or restoration.
Losses resulting from acts of terrorism are covered as common occurrences, such that if terrorist acts occur against one or more commercial nuclear power plants insured by NEIL within a 12-month period, they would be treated as one event and the owners of the plants where the act occurred would share one full limit of liability. The full limit of liability is currently $3.2 billion. NEIL sublimits the total aggregate for all of their policies for non-nuclear terrorist events to approximately $1.8 billion.
Each nuclear facility has accident property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning liability insurance from NEIL with limits of $1.5 billion, except for Crystal River Unit 3. Crystal River Unit 3’s limit is $50 million and is on an actual cash value basis. All nuclear facilities except for Catawba and Crystal River Unit 3 also share an additional $1.25 billion nuclear accident insurance limit above their dedicated underlying limit. This shared additional excess limit is not subject to reinstatement in the event of a loss. Catawba has a dedicated $1.25 billion of additional nuclear accident insurance limit above its dedicated underlying limit. Catawba and Oconee also have an additional $750 million of non-nuclear accident property damage limit. All coverages are subject to sublimits and significant deductibles.
NEIL’s Accidental Outage policy provides some coverage, similar to business interruption, for losses in the event of a major accident property damage outage of a nuclear unit. Coverage is provided on a weekly limit basis after a significant waiting period deductible and at 100% of the applicable weekly limits for 52 weeks and 80% of the applicable weekly limits for up to the next 110 weeks. Coverage is provided until these applicable weekly periods are met, where the accidental outage policy limit will not exceed $490 million for Catawba, McGuire, Harris, Brunswick, Oconee and Robinson. NEIL sublimits the accidental outage recovery up to the first 104 weeks of coverage not to exceed $328 million from non-nuclear accidental property damage. Coverage amounts decrease in the event more than one unit at a station is out of service due to a common accident. All coverages are subject to sublimits and significant deductibles.
Potential Retroactive Premium Assessments
In the event of NEIL losses, NEIL’s board of directors may assess member companies' retroactive premiums of amounts up to 10 times their annual premiums for up to six years after a loss. NEIL has never exercised this assessment. The maximum aggregate annual retrospective premium obligations for Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are $151 million, $93 million and $1 million, respectively. Duke Energy Carolinas' maximum assessment amount includes 100% of potential obligations to NEIL for jointly owned reactors. Duke Energy Carolinas would seek reimbursement from the joint owners for their portion of these assessment amounts.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and federallocal regulations covering the closure ofregarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, coal ash impoundments, including the EPA CCR rule and the Coal Ash Act, and other agreements. AROs recordedenvironmental matters. These regulations can be changed from time to time, imposing new obligations on the Duke Energy Registrants' Consolidated Balance Sheets includeRegistrants. The following environmental matters impact all of the legal obligation for closure of coal ash basins and the disposal of related ashDuke Energy Registrants.
Remediation Activities
In addition to AROs recorded as a result of various environmental regulations, discussed in Note 10, the Duke Energy Registrants are responsible for environmental remediation at various sites. These include certain properties that are part of ongoing operations and sites formerly owned or used by Duke Energy entities. These sites are in various stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring. Managed in conjunction with relevant federal, state and local agencies, remediation activities vary based upon site conditions and location, remediation requirements, complexity and sharing of responsibility. If remediation activities involve joint and several liability provisions, strict liability, or cost recovery or contribution actions, the Duke Energy Registrants could potentially be held responsible for environmental impacts caused by other potentially responsible parties and may also benefit from insurance policies or contractual indemnities that cover some or all cleanup costs. Liabilities are recorded when losses become probable and are reasonably estimable. The total costs that may be incurred cannot be estimated because the extent of environmental impact, allocation among potentially responsible parties, remediation alternatives and/or regulatory decisions have not yet been determined at all sites. Additional costs associated with remediation activities are likely to be incurred in the future and could be significant. Costs are typically expensed as Operation, maintenance and other in the Consolidated Statements of Operations unless regulatory recovery of the costs is deemed probable.
152

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The following table contains information regarding reserves for probable and estimable costs related to the various environmental sites. These reserves are recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(in millions)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Reserves for Environmental Remediation
Duke Energy$84 $88 
Duke Energy Carolinas22 19 
Progress Energy19 23 
Duke Energy Progress8 11 
Duke Energy Florida11 11 
Duke Energy Ohio33 34 
Duke Energy Indiana3 
Piedmont7 
Additional losses in excess of recorded reserves that could be incurred for the stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring for environmental sites that have been evaluated at this time are not material.
LITIGATION
Duke Energy
Michael Johnson et al. v. Duke Energy Corporation et al.
On September 23, 2020, plaintiff Michael Johnson, a former Duke Energy employee and participant in the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan (Plan) brought suit on his own behalf and on behalf of other participants and beneficiaries similarly situated against Duke Energy Corporation, the Duke Energy Benefits Committee, and other unnamed individual defendants. The complaint, which was subsequently amended to add a current participant as a plaintiff on November 23, 2020, alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties with respect to certain fees associated with the Plan in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and seeks certification of a class of all individuals who were participants or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time on or after September 23, 2014. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint on December 18, 2020. On January 31, 2022, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. On February 28, 2022, Duke Energy responded to the amended complaint. Discovery commenced and the parties exchanged preliminary disclosures. After review of these regulationsdisclosures, the plaintiffs agreed to voluntarily dismiss the suit and agreements.the parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice on April 29, 2022, ending this litigation.
Texas Storm Uri Tort Litigation
Duke Energy Corporation and several Duke Energy renewables project companies in the ERCOT market were named in more than thirty lawsuits arising out of Texas Storm Uri, which occurred in February 2021. Duke Energy Corporation was dismissed from the suits, leaving two suits in which individual wind and solar projects are named. These lawsuits seek recovery for property damages, personal injury and wrongful death allegedly caused by the power outages that plaintiffs claim were the collective failure of generators, transmission and distribution utilities ("TDUs"), retail energy providers, natural gas providers, co-ops and municipalities that generate power and ERCOT, all of which were originally sued by all plaintiffs. The cases were consolidated into a Texas state court multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceeding for discovery and pre-trial motions. Five cases were designated for motions to dismiss and all other cases were stayed. On January 28, 2023, the Court denied the generators' and TDUs' motions to dismiss the negligence claims but dismissed the tortious interference and conspiracy claims. The motions to dismiss ERCOT and the natural gas defendants were also granted. The generator and TDU defendants filed a petition for mandamus in each of the five cases seeking to overturn the denials on February 10, 2023. If the Texas Court of Appeals accepts the appeals, it will set a briefing schedule. The remaining cases that are part of the MDL are currently stayed, except that plaintiffs have been given leave to amend their pleadings. Plaintiffs began amending existing lawsuits and filing new lawsuits on behalf of hundreds of plaintiffs against hundreds of defendants, including in some cases, by again naming Duke Energy Corporation and naming, for the first time, Duke Energy Renewables, LLC. Plaintiffs have also re-named ERCOT as a defendant. As new cases are served, they are being brought into the MDL and are subject to the stay in the MDL proceeding. Duke Energy cannot predict the outcomes of these matters. See Note 2 for more information related to the sale of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Ruben Villano, et al. v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
On June 16, 2021, a group of nine individuals went over a low head dam adjacent to the Dan River Steam Station in Eden, North Carolina, while water tubing. Emergency personnel rescued four people and five others were confirmed deceased. On August 11, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas was served with the complaint filed in Durham County Superior Court on behalf of four survivors, which was later amended to include all the decedents along with the survivors. The lawsuit alleges that Duke Energy Carolinas knew that the river was used for recreational purposes and that Duke Energy did not adequately warn about the dam and that Duke Energy Carolinas created a dangerous and hidden hazard on the Dan River in building and maintaining the low head dam. Discovery has commenced and is scheduled to be completed on or before August 23, 2023. The parties are preparing for mediation, which is scheduled for March 22, 2023. Dispositive motions are due to be filed by September 6, 2023, and the case is scheduled to be trial-ready by October 2, 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
153

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NTE Carolinas II, LLC Litigation
In November 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas entered into a standard FERC large generator interconnection agreement (LGIA) with NTE Carolinas II, LLC (NTE), a company that proposed to build a combined-cycle natural gas plant in Rockingham County, North Carolina. On September 6, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a lawsuit in Mecklenburg County Superior Court against NTE for breach of contract, alleging that NTE's failure to pay benchmark payments for Duke Energy Carolinas' transmission system upgrades required under the interconnection agreement constituted a termination of the interconnection agreement. Duke Energy Carolinas sought a monetary judgment against NTE because NTE failed to make multiple milestone payments. The lawsuit was moved to federal court in North Carolina. NTE filed a motion to dismiss Duke Energy Carolinas’ complaint and brought counterclaims alleging anti-competitive conduct and violations of state and federal statutes. Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion to dismiss NTE's counterclaims. Both NTE's and Duke Energy Carolinas' motions to dismiss were subsequently denied by the court.
On May 21, 2020, in response to an NTE petition challenging Duke Energy Carolinas' termination of the LGIA, FERC issued a ruling that 1) it has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a transmission provider may terminate a LGIA; 2) FERC approval is required to terminate a conforming LGIA if objected to by the interconnection customer; and 3) Duke Energy may not announce the termination of a conforming LGIA unless FERC has approved the termination. FERC's Office of Enforcement also initiated an investigation of Duke Energy Carolinas into matters pertaining to the LGIA. Duke Energy Carolinas is cooperating with the Office of Enforcement but cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Following completion of discovery, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling in its favor as to some of its affirmative claims against NTE and to all of NTE’s counterclaims. On June 24, 2022, the court issued an order partially granting Duke Energy Carolinas' motion by dismissing NTE's counterclaims that Duke Energy Carolinas engaged in anti-competitive behavior in violation of state and federal statutes. On October 12, 2022, the parties executed a settlement agreement with respect to the remaining breach of contract claims in the litigation and a Stipulation of Dismissal was filed with the court on October 13, 2022. On November 11, 2022, NTE filed its Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit as to the District Court's summary judgment ruling in Duke Energy Carolinas' favor on NTE's antitrust and unfair competition claims. Briefing on NTE's appeal will be completed on May 3, 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Asbestos-related Injuries and Damages Claims
Duke Energy Carolinas has experienced numerous claims for indemnification and medical cost reimbursement related to asbestos exposure. These claims relate to damages for bodily injuries alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with construction and maintenance activities conducted on its electric generation plants prior to 1985.
Duke Energy Carolinas has recognized asbestos-related reserves of $457 million and $501 million at December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These reserves are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the reserves is a result of a third-party study completed in 2021 as well as settlements made throughout the year. These reserves are based upon Duke Energy Carolinas' best estimate for current and future asbestos claims through 2042 and are recorded on an undiscounted basis. In light of the uncertainties inherent in a longer-term forecast, management does not believe they can reasonably estimate the indemnity and medical costs that might be incurred after 2042 related to such potential claims. It is possible Duke Energy Carolinas may incur asbestos liabilities in excess of the recorded reserves.
Duke Energy Carolinas has third-party insurance to cover certain losses related to asbestos-related injuries and damages above an aggregate self-insured retention. Receivables for insurance recoveries were $595 million and $644 million at December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These amounts are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets and Receivables within Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any future payments up to the policy limit will be reimbursed by the third-party insurance carrier. Duke Energy Carolinas is not aware of any uncertainties regarding the legal sufficiency of insurance claims. Duke Energy Carolinas believes the insurance recovery asset is probable of recovery as the insurance carrier continues to have a strong financial strength rating.
The AROreserve for credit losses for insurance receivables for the asbestos-related injuries and damages is $12 million for Duke Energy and Duke Energy Carolinas as of December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021. The insurance receivable is evaluated based on the risk of default and the historical losses, current conditions and expected conditions around collectability. Management evaluates the risk of default annually based on payment history, credit rating and changes in the risk of default from credit agencies.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida
Spent Nuclear Fuel Matters
On June 18, 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida sued the U.S. in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for damages incurred for the period 2014 through 2018. The lawsuit claimed the DOE breached a contract in failing to accept spent nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and asserted damages for the cost of on-site storage in the amount recordedof $100 million and $200 million for Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively.
On March 30, 2022, the DOE and Duke Energy Progress executed a settlement agreement, pursuant to which Duke Energy Progress would receive damages for costs incurred between 2014 and 2018 and would be able to submit future costs on a defined schedule. In April 2022, Duke Energy Progress received $87 million in proceeds that related to damages incurred in 2014 through 2018.
On May 2, 2022, the DOE and Duke Energy Florida executed a settlement agreement, pursuant to which Duke Energy Florida would receive damages for costs incurred between 2014 and 2018 and would be able to submit costs incurred in 2019 and 2020 pursuant to an audit process. In June 2022, Duke Energy Florida received $180 million in proceeds that related to damages incurred in 2014 through 2018.
154

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Duke Energy Indiana
Coal Ash Basin Closure Plan Appeal
On January 27, 2020, Hoosier Environmental Council (HEC) filed a Petition for Administrative Review with the Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication challenging the Indiana Department of Environmental Management’s (IDEM's) December 10, 2019 partial approval of Duke Energy Indiana’s ash pond closure plan at Duke Energy's Gallagher power station. After hearing oral arguments in early April 2021 on Duke Energy Indiana's and HEC's competing Motions for Summary Judgment, on May 4, 2021, the administrative court rejected all of HEC’s claims and issued a ruling in favor of Duke Energy Indiana. On June 3, 2021, HEC filed an appeal in Superior Court to seek judicial review of the order. Briefing on the appeal was completed on December 13, 2021.
On January 11, 2022, Duke Energy Indiana received a compliance obligation letter from the EPA notifying the company that the two basins at issue in the litigation are subject to requirements of the CCR Rule. The letter does not provide a deadline for compliance. Duke Energy Indiana is proceeding with surface impoundment closure at its Indiana sites consistent with EPA’s guidance, the federal CCR rule, and Indiana law, as applicable.
On April 21, 2022, HEC filed a motion requesting that the court hold a hearing within 45 days and also take judicial notice of the EPA's January 11, 2022 letter. On April 22, 2022, Duke Energy Indiana sent IDEM a letter withdrawing the closure plans for the Gallagher North Ash Pond and Primary Pond Ash Fill. After acknowledgment by IDEM of withdrawal of these closure plans, Duke Energy Indiana filed a Motion to Dismiss the litigation as moot on April 28, 2022, which IDEM supported, and the court granted the Motion to Dismiss on July 8, 2022.
Coal Ash Insurance Coverage Litigation
In June 2022, Duke Energy Indiana filed a civil action in Indiana Superior Court against various insurance companies seeking declaratory relief with respect to insurance coverage for coal combustion residuals-related expenses and liabilities covered by third-party liability insurance policies. The insurance policies cover the 1969-1972 and 1984-1985 periods and provide third-party liability insurance for claims and suits alleging property damage, bodily injury and personal injury (or a combination thereof). A trial date has not yet been set. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Other Litigation and Legal Proceedings
The Duke Energy Registrants are involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve significant amounts. The Duke Energy Registrants believe the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position for the years presented. Reserves are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is based upon estimated closure costs for impacted ash impoundments. The amount recorded representsin Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities.
OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
General
As part of their normal business, the discountedDuke Energy Registrants are party to various financial guarantees, performance guarantees and other contractual commitments to extend guarantees of credit and other assistance to various subsidiaries, investees and other third parties. These guarantees involve elements of performance and credit risk, which are not fully recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and have uncapped maximum potential payments. However, the Duke Energy Registrants do not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See Note 8 for estimated closure costs based upon specific closure plans. Actualmore information.
Purchase Obligations
Purchased Power
Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Ohio have ongoing purchased power contracts, including renewable energy contracts, with other utilities, wholesale marketers, co-generators and qualified facilities. These purchased power contracts generally provide for capacity and energy payments. In addition, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have various contracts to secure transmission rights.
The following table presents executory purchased power contracts with terms exceeding one year, excluding contracts classified as leases.
  Minimum Purchase Amount at December 31, 2022
Contract
(in millions)Expiration20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Duke Energy Progress(a)
2028-2032$22 $21 $22 $18 $19 $27 $129 
Duke Energy Florida(b)
2024-2025300 267 91 — — — 658 
Duke Energy Ohio(c)
202455 36 — — — — 91 
(a)    Contracts represent between 18% and 100% of net plant output.
(b)    Contracts represent 100% of net plant output.
(c)    Share of net plant output varies. Excludes PPA with OVEC.
155

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Gas Supply and Capacity Contracts
Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont routinely enter into long-term natural gas supply commodity and capacity commitments and other agreements that commit future cash flows to acquire services needed in their businesses. These commitments include pipeline and storage capacity contracts and natural gas supply contracts to provide service to customers. Costs arising from the natural gas supply commodity and capacity commitments, while significant, are pass-through costs to be incurred will be dependent upon factors that vary from site to site. The most significant factorscustomers and are the method and time frame of closure at the individual sites. Closure methods considered include removing the water from ash basins, consolidating material as necessary and capping the ash with a synthetic barrier, excavating and relocating the ash to a lined structural fill or lined landfill or recycling the ash for concrete or some other beneficial use. The ultimate method and timetable for closure will be in compliance with standards set by federal and state regulations and other agreements. The ARO amount will be adjusted as additional information is gainedgenerally fully recoverable through the closurefuel adjustment or PGA procedures and post-closure process, including acceptanceprudence reviews in North Carolina and approvalSouth Carolina and under the Tennessee Incentive Plan in Tennessee. In the Midwest, these costs are recovered via the Gas Cost Recovery Rate in Ohio or the Gas Cost Adjustment Clause in Kentucky. The time periods for fixed payments under pipeline and storage capacity contracts are up to 20 years. The time periods for fixed payments under natural gas supply contracts are up to four years. The time period for the natural gas supply purchase commitments is up to nine years.
Certain storage and pipeline capacity contracts require the payment of compliance approaches, which may change management assumptions,demand charges that are based on rates approved by the FERC in order to maintain rights to access the natural gas storage or pipeline capacity on a firm basis during the contract term. The demand charges that are incurred in each period are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and may result in a material change to the balance. See ARO Liability Rollforward section below for information on revisions made to the coal ash liability during 2019Comprehensive Income as part of natural gas purchases and 2018.
Asset retirement costs associated with the AROs for operating plants and retired plants are included in NetCost of natural gas.
The following table presents future unconditional purchase obligations under natural gas supply and capacity contracts as of December 31, 2022.
(in millions)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Duke Energy Ohio$85 $101 $85 $56 $52 $616 $995 
Piedmont319 313 267 213 203 587 1,902 
6. LEASES
As part of its operations, Duke Energy leases certain aircraft, space on communication towers, industrial equipment, fleet vehicles, fuel transportation (barges and railcars), land and office space under various terms and expiration dates. Additionally, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Indiana have finance leases related to firm natural gas pipeline transportation capacity. Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have entered into certain PPAs, which are classified as finance and operating leases.
Duke Energy has certain lease agreements, which include variable lease payments that are based on the usage of an asset. These variable lease payments are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets or operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain Duke Energy lease agreements include options for renewal and early termination. The intent to renew a lease varies depending on the lease type and asset. Renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised are included in the lease measurements. The decision to terminate a lease early is dependent on various economic factors. No termination options have been included in any of the lease measurements.
Duke Energy Carolinas entered into a sale-leaseback arrangement in December 2019, to construct and occupy an office tower. The lease agreement was evaluated as a sale-leaseback of real estate and it was determined that the transaction did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. As a result, the transaction is being accounted for as a financing. For this transaction, Duke Energy Carolinas will continue to record the real estate on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within Property, Plant and Equipment as if it were the legal owner and will continue to recognize depreciation expense over the estimated useful life. In addition, the failed sale-leaseback obligation is reported within Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the monthly lease payments commencing after the construction phase being split between interest expense and principal pay down of the debt.
Piedmont has certain agreements with Duke Energy Carolinas for the construction and transportation of natural gas pipelines to supply its natural gas plant needs. Piedmont accounts for these pipeline lateral contracts as sales-type leases since the present value of the sum of the lease payments equals the fair value of the assets. These pipeline lateral assets owned by Piedmont had a current net investment basis of $2 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, and a long-term net investment basis of $201 million and $203 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These assets are classified in Other, within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets, respectively, on Piedmont's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Duke Energy Carolinas accounts for the contracts as finance leases. The activity for these contracts is eliminated in consolidation at Duke Energy.
156

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES
The following tables present the components of lease expense.
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Operating lease expense(a)
$229 $39 $153 $83 $70 $10 $19 $6 
Short-term lease expense(a)
4  1  1  2  
Variable lease expense(a)
61 (1)60 37 23   1 
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets(b)
151 6 61 41 20    
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
50 32 49 45 4  1  
Total finance lease expense201 38 110 86 24  1  
Total lease expense$495 $76 $324 $206 $118 $10 $22 $7 
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Operating lease expense(a)
$245 $43 $155 $83 $72 $11 $18 $
Short-term lease expense(a)
— — — 
Variable lease expense(a)
41 17 22 10 12 — — 
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets(b)
219 37 18 19 — — 
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
55 33 48 42 — — — 
Total finance lease expense274 38 85 60 25 — — 
Total lease expense$565 $98 $264 $154 $110 $11 $21 $
(a)    Included in Operations, maintenance and other or, for barges and railcars, Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(b)    Included in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(c)    Included in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents operating lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to operating lease liabilities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2023$225 $23 $118 $64 $54 $2 $6 $4 
2024207 21 110 56 54 2 5 4 
2025175 14 96 42 54 2 5 4 
2026161 13 99 45 54 2 4  
2027134 9 73 46 27 2 4  
Thereafter322 37 253 209 44 15 45 1 
Total operating lease payments1,224 117 749 462 287 25 69 13 
Less: present value discount(169)(20)(107)(76)(31)(7)(18) 
Total operating lease liabilities(a)
$1,055 $97 $642 $386 $256 $18 $51 $13 
(a)    Certain operating lease payments include renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised.
157

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES
The following table presents finance lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to finance lease liabilities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndiana
2023$198 $38 $103 $78 $25 $1 
2024143 38 88 79 9 1 
202576 38 85 80 5 1 
202677 38 86 81 5 1 
202774 38 82 81 1 1 
Thereafter584 427 555 555  23 
Total finance lease payments1,152 617 999 954 45 28 
Less: amounts representing interest(388)(333)(371)(367)(4)(19)
Total finance lease liabilities$764 $284 $628 $587 $41 $9 
The following tables contain additional information related to leases.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)ClassificationEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Assets
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,042 $78 $628 $370 $258 $18 $49 $4 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment810 284 674 590 84  6  
Total lease assets$1,852 $362 $1,302 $960 $342 $18 $55 $4 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingOther current liabilities$179 $14 $96 $51 $45 $1 $4 $ 
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt153 7 57 35 22    
Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities876 83 546 335 211 17 47 13 
FinanceLong-Term Debt611 277 571 552 19  9  
Total lease liabilities$1,819 $381 $1,270 $973 $297 $18 $60 $13 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)ClassificationEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Assets
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,136 $92 $691 $389 $302 $19 $53 $16 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment950 302 729 627 102 — — 
Total lease assets$2,086 $394 $1,420 $1,016 $404 $19 $60 $16 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingOther current liabilities$184 $22 $94 $50 $44 $$$
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt151 61 41 20 — — — 
Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities940 78 606 350 256 18 50 14 
FinanceLong-Term Debt764 283 629 588 41 — 10 — 
Total lease liabilities$2,039 $389 $1,390 $1,029 $361 $19 $64 $19 
158

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$230 $24 $118 $63 $55 $2 $6 $4 
Operating cash flows from finance leases50 32 49 45 4  1  
Financing cash flows from finance leases151 6 61 41 20    
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating(b)
$111 $10 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$245 $25 $117 $62 $55 $$$
Operating cash flows from finance leases55 33 48 42 — — — 
Financing cash flows from finance leases219 37 18 19 — — 
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating(b)
$182 $$99 $99 $— $— $— $— 
Finance322 — 322 322 — — — — 
(a)    No amounts were classified as investing cash flows from operating leases.
(b)    Does not include ROU assets recorded as a result of the adoption of the new lease standard.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases81089615151
Finance leases1017121212 23 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
Operating leases3.4 %3.8 %3.6 %3.5 %3.8 %4.2 %4.0 %3.3 %
Finance leases7.7 %11.5 %9.1 %9.1 %8.0 % %11.9 % %
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases89810716164
Finance leases1018131311— 24— 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
Operating leases3.5 %3.5 %3.6 %3.4 %3.8 %4.2 %4.1 %3.6 %
Finance leases7.3 %11.6 %9.0 %9.0 %8.2 %— %11.9 %— %
(a)    The discount rate is calculated using the rate implicit in a lease if it is readily determinable. Generally, the rate used by the lessor is not provided to Duke Energy and in these cases the incremental borrowing rate is used. Duke Energy will typically use its fully collateralized incremental borrowing rate as of the commencement date to calculate and record the lease. The incremental borrowing rate is influenced by the lessee’s credit rating and lease term and as such may differ for individual leases, embedded leases or portfolios of leased assets.
159

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
7. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Summary of Debt and Related Terms
The following tables summarize outstanding debt and includes debt attributable to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details.
 December 31, 2022
Weighted
AverageDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
InterestDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)RateEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2023-20824.20 %$29,585 $1,150 $2,600 $ $950 $1,330 $697 $3,390 
Secured debt, maturing 2023-20524.11 %5,632 1,317 2,383 1,155 1,228    
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2023-2052(a)
3.89 %32,645 11,306 16,350 8,776 7,576 1,850 3,138  
Finance leases, maturing 2023-2051(b)
7.90 %764 284 628 587 41  9  
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2046(c)
3.84 %1,331  500 500  77 352  
Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
4.50 %4,582        
Money pool/intercompany borrowings  1,533 993 389 605 522 585 514 
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment (5)       
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
 1,016 (21)(40)(23)(16)(25)(17)(9)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
(383)(70)(132)(59)(70)(12)(22)(18)
Total debt4.09 %$75,167 $15,499 $23,282 $11,325 $10,314 $3,742 $4,742 $3,877 
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper (3,952)       
Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings (1,233)(843)(238)(605)(497)(435)(514)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
 (4,154)(1,018)(697)(369)(328)(475)(303)(45)
Total long-term debt(g)
$67,061 $13,248 $21,742 $10,718 $9,381 $2,770 $4,004 $3,318 
(a)Substantially all electric utility property plantis mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)Duke Energy includes $164 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Florida related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)Includes $625 million classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and equipmentintent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper program was 15 days.
(e)Duke Energy includes $1,057 million and Regulatory assets, respectively,$85 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)Duke Energy includes $27 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.
160

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
 December 31, 2021
Weighted
AverageDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
InterestDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)RateEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2022-20823.71 %$24,564 $1,150 $2,250 $— $150 $1,330 $700 $2,990 
Secured debt, maturing 2022-20522.50 %5,584 1,094 2,397 1,120 1,278 — — — 
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2022-2051(a)
3.87 %31,026 10,507 15,450 8,375 7,075 1,850 3,219 — 
Finance leases, maturing 2022-2051(b)
5.81 %915 289 690 629 61 — 10 — 
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2041(c)
0.65 %360 — 48 48 — 27 285 — 
Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
0.35 %3,929 — — — — — — — 
Money pool/intercompany borrowings — 526 2,959 322 199 128 150 518 
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment — — — — — — 
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
 1,119 (21)(34)(19)(14)(27)(18)(6)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
(362)(67)(128)(54)(68)(13)(23)(16)
Total debt3.50 %$67,139 $13,482 $23,632 $10,421 $8,681 $3,295 $4,323 $3,486 
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper (3,304)— — — — — — — 
Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings— (226)(2,809)(172)(199)(103)— (518)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
 (3,387)(362)(1,082)(556)(76)— (84)— 
Total long-term debt(g)
$60,448 $12,894 $19,741 $9,693 $8,406 $3,192 $4,239 $2,968 
(a)    Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)    Duke Energy includes $256 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Florida related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)    Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)    Includes $625 million that was classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper programs was 15 days.
(e)    Duke Energy includes $1,121 million and $100 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)    Duke Energy includes $29 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)     Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt
The following table shows the significant components of Current maturities of Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 4 forThe Duke Energy Registrants currently anticipate satisfying these obligations with cash on hand and proceeds from additional information on Regulatory assets related to AROs.borrowings.
Cost recovery for future expenditures will be pursued through the normal ratemaking process
(in millions)Maturity DateInterest RateDecember 31, 2022
Unsecured Debt
Duke Energy (Parent)April 20232.875 %$350 
Duke Energy (Parent)(a)
June 20233.469 %500 
Duke Energy (Parent)October 20233.950 %400 
Duke Energy Ohio(a)
October 20234.272 %150 
Duke Energy Indiana(a)
October 20234.118 %300 
First Mortgage Bonds
Duke Energy CarolinasMarch 20232.500 %500 
Duke Energy CarolinasMarch 20233.050 %500 
Duke Energy ProgressSeptember 20233.375 %300 
Duke Energy OhioSeptember 20233.800 %300 
Other(b)
854 
Current maturities of long-term debt$4,154 
(a)    Debt has a floating interest rate.
(b)    Includes finance lease obligations, amortizing debt, tax-exempt bonds with federalmandatory put options and state utility commissions, which permit recovery of necessary and prudently incurred costs associated with Duke Energy’s regulated operations. See Note 4 for additional information on recovery of coal ash costs.

small bullet maturities.
174
161




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Maturities and Call Options
The following table shows the annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter. Amounts presented exclude short-term notes payable, commercial paper and money pool borrowings and debt issuance costs for the Subsidiary Registrants.
 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)
Energy(a)
CarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2023$4,154 $1,018 $697 $369 $328 $475 $303 $45 
20243,216 19 939 72 867  4 40 
20254,322 491 1,040 975 65 245 4 205 
20262,682 621 345 279 66 45 4 40 
20273,203 323 947 233 714 102 177 300 
Thereafter52,999 11,884 18,642 9,238 7,753 2,415 3,853 2,760 
Total long-term debt, including current maturities$70,576 $14,356 $22,610 $11,166 $9,793 $3,282 $4,345 $3,390 
(a)    Excludes $1,169 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to the Progress Energy merger and the Piedmont acquisition.
The Duke Energy Registrants have the ability under certain debt facilities to call and repay the obligation prior to its scheduled maturity. Therefore, the actual timing of future cash repayments could be materially different than as presented above.
Short-Term Obligations Classified as Long-Term Debt
Tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder and certain commercial paper issuances and money pool borrowings are classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These tax-exempt bonds, commercial paper issuances and money pool borrowings, which are short-term obligations by nature, are classified as long-term due to Duke Energy’s intent and ability to utilize such borrowings as long-term financing. As Duke Energy’s Master Credit Facility and other bilateral letter of credit agreements have non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of the balance sheet date, Duke Energy has the ability to refinance these short-term obligations on a long-term basis. The following tables show short-term obligations classified as long-term debt.
 December 31, 2022 and 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasProgressOhioIndiana
Tax-exempt bonds$312 $ $ $27 $285 
Commercial paper(a)
625 300 150 25 150 
Total$937 $300 $150 $52 $435 
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS


ARO Liability Rollforward
The following tables present changes in the liability associated with AROs.
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Balance at December 31, 2017$10,175
 $3,610
 $5,414
 $4,673
 $742
 $84
 $781
 $15
Accretion expense(a)
427
 179
 225
 196
 29
 4
 29
 1
Liabilities settled(b)  
(638) (281) (272) (227) (45) (5) (79) 
Liabilities incurred in the current year(c)
39
 8
 5
 
 5
 
 25
 
Revisions in estimates of cash flows464
 433
 39
 178
 (140) 10
 (34) 3
Balance at December 31, 201810,467

3,949

5,411

4,820

591

93

722
 19
Accretion expense(a)
508
 235
 252
 227
 25
 3
 28
 1
Liabilities settled(b)  
(895) (329) (499) (460) (39) (12) (54) 
Liabilities incurred in the current year25
 18
 7
 
 7
 
 
 
Revisions in estimates of cash flows(d)
3,213
 1,861
 1,300
 1,306
 (6) (4) 136
 (3)
Balance at December 31, 2019$13,318

$5,734

$6,471

$5,893

$578

$80

$832
 $17
(a)Substantially all accretion expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, relates to Duke Energy’s regulated operations and has been deferred in accordance with regulatory accounting treatment.
(b)Amounts primarily relate to ash impoundment closures and nuclear decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3.
(c)Amounts primarily relate to AROs recorded as a result of state agency closure requirements at Duke Energy Indiana.
(d)Amounts primarily relate to increases in closure estimates for certain ash impoundments as a result of the NCDEQ's April 1 Order and the related settlement agreement dated December 31, 2019. See Note 5 for more information. The amount recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019 for coal ash closures as a result of the settlement was not material.

(a)    Progress Energy amounts are equal to Duke Energy Progress amounts.
Summary of Significant Debt Issuances
In January 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas issued $1.8 billion of first mortgage bonds. The issuance was split between a $900 million,10-year tranche at 4.95% and a $900 million, 30-year tranche at 5.35%. The net proceeds will be used to refinance $1 billion of Duke Energy Carolinas bonds maturing in March 2023, to pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
175
162




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPROPERTY, PLANTDEBT AND EQUIPMENTCREDIT FACILITIES


11. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following tables summarize significant debt issuances (in millions).
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
MaturityInterestDukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Issuance DateDateRateEnergy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaPiedmont
Unsecured Debt
May 2022(a)
May 20525.050 %$400 $ $ $ $ $400 
June 2022(b)
June 20284.750 %645 645     
June 2022(b)
June 20345.306 %537 537     
August 2022(c)
March 20284.300 %900 900     
August 2022(c)
August 20324.500 %1,150 1,150     
August 2022(c)
August 20525.000 %1,150 1,150    
December 2022(d)
December 20255.000 %500 500     
December 2022(d)
December 20275.000 %500 500     
First Mortgage Bonds
March 2022(e)
March 20322.850 %500  500    
March 2022(e)
March 20523.550 %650  650    
March 2022(e)
April 20323.400 %500   500   
March 2022(e)
April 20524.000 %

400   400   
November 2022(f)
November 20525.950 %500    500  
Tax-exempt Bonds
June 2022(g)
September 20304.000 %168 168     
June 2022(g)
November 20394.250 %234 234     
September 2022(h)
October 20463.300 %200   200  
September 2022(i)
October 20463.700 %210   210  
September 2022(i)
October 20464.000 %42   42  
Total issuances$9,186 $5,784 $1,150 $1,352 $500 $400 
(a)Debt issued to repay a portion of outstanding intercompany short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Duke Energy (Parent) issued 600 million euros aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due June 2028 and 500 million euros aggregate principal amount of 3.85% senior notes due June 2034. Debt issued to repay a $500 million debt maturity, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes. Duke Energy's obligations under its euro-denominated fixed-rate notes were effectively converted to fixed-rate U.S. dollars at issuance through cross-currency swaps, mitigating foreign currency exchange risk associated with the property, plantinterest and principal payments. See Note 15 for additional information.
(c)Debt issued to repay a portion of short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(d)Proceeds will be used to repay a portion of commercial paper and for general corporate purposes.
(e)Debt issued to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, existing or new eligible projects under the sustainable financing framework.
(f)Debt issued to repay a portion of outstanding intercompany short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(g)Debt issued to refund the Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding bonds, previously held in treasury, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain solid waste disposal facilities. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is June 1, 2027.
(h)Debt issued to provide funds to refund the prior bonds, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain air and water pollution control equipment and solid waste disposal equipment. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is October 1, 2026.
(i)Debt issued to provide funds to refund the prior bonds, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain air and water pollution control equipment and solid waste disposal equipment. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is October 1, 2030.
163

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
MaturityInterestDukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Issuance DateDateRateEnergy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaPiedmont
Unsecured Debt
March 2021a)
March 20312.500 %$350 $— $— $— $— $350 
June 2021(b)(c)
June 20230.299 %500 500 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20312.550 %1,000 1,000 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20413.300 %750 750 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20513.500 %750 750 — — — — 
September 2021(d)
January 20823.250 %500 500 — — — — 
Secured Debt
November 2021(e)
July 20311.679 %100 — 100 — — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20412.617 %137 — 137 — — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20281.295 %221 — — 221 — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20372.387 %352 — — 352 — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20412.799 %197 — — 197 — — 
First Mortgage Bonds
April 2021(f)
April 20312.550 %550 — 550 — — — 
April 2021(f)
April 20513.450 %450 — 450 — — — 
August 2021(g)
August 20312.000 %650 — — 650 — — 
August 2021(g)
August 20512.900 %450 — — 450 — — 
December 2021(h)
December 20312.400 %650 — — — 650 — 
December 2021(h)
December 20513.000 %500 — — — 500 — 
Total issuances$8,107 $3,500 $1,237 $1,870 $1,150 $350 
(a)Debt issued to repay at maturity $160 million senior unsecured notes due June 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Debt has a floating interest rate.
(c)Debt issued to repay $1.75 billion of Duke Energy (Parent) debt maturities, to repay a portion of short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(d)Debt issued to repay in October 2021 $500 million of Duke Energy (Parent) unsecured notes. The interest rate resets every five years.
(e)Debt issued to finance the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego.
(f)Debt issued to repay at maturity $500 million first mortgage bonds due June 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(g)Debt issued to repay at maturity a total of $600 million first mortgage bonds due September 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(h)Proceeds were used to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, existing or new eligible projects under the sustainable financing framework.
AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES
Master Credit Facility
In March 2022, Duke Energy amended its existing Master Credit Facility to increase the amount of the facility from $8 billion to $9 billion and to extend the termination date to March 2027. The Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, have borrowing capacity under the Master Credit Facility up to a specified sublimit for each borrower. Duke Energy has the unilateral ability at any time to increase or decrease the borrowing sublimits of each borrower, subject to a maximum sublimit for each borrower. The amount available under the Master Credit Facility has been reduced to backstop issuances of commercial paper, certain letters of credit and variable-rate demand tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder.
164

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
The table below includes the current borrowing sublimits and available capacity under these credit facilities.
 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Facility size(a)
$9,000 $2,375 $1,925 $800 $1,150 $900 $1,050 $800 
Reduction to backstop issuances
Commercial paper(b)
(3,685)463 (1,533)(389)(605)(522)(585)(514)
Outstanding letters of credit(40)(27)(4)(2)(7)   
Tax-exempt bonds(81)     (81) 
Available capacity$5,194 $2,811 $388 $409 $538 $378 $384 $286 
(a)    Represents the sublimit of each borrower.
(b)    Duke Energy issued $625 million of commercial paper and loaned the proceeds through the money pool to Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. The balances are classified as Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Duke Energy (Parent) Term Loan Facility
On March 9, 2022, Duke Energy (Parent) entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement) with commitments totaling $1.4 billion maturing on March 9, 2024. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement may be extended for up to two years by request of Duke Energy (Parent), upon satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the facility were used to repay amounts drawn under the Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of Duke Energy's outstanding commercial paper. In December 2022, Duke Energy (Parent) repaid $400 million of the term loan. The balance is classified as Long-Term Debt on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility was terminated in March 2022.
Duke Energy Florida Term Loan Facility
In October 2022, Duke Energy Florida entered into a term loan facility with commitments totaling $800 million expiring in April 2024. The term loan was fully drawn at the time of closing In October and borrowings were used for storm costs, under-collected fuel and general company purposes. The balance is classified as Long-Term Debt on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other Debt Matters
In September 2022, Duke Energy filed a Form S-3 with the SEC. Under this Form S-3, which is uncapped, the Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, may issue debt and other securities, including preferred stock, in the future at amounts, prices and with terms to be determined at the time of future offerings. The registration statement was filed to replace a similar prior filing upon expiration of its three-year term and also allows for the issuance of common and preferred stock by Duke Energy.
Also in September 2022, to replace another similar prior filing, Duke Energy filed an effective Form S-3 with the SEC to sell up to $4 billion of variable denomination floating-rate demand notes, called PremierNotes. The Form S-3 states that no more than $2 billion of the notes will be outstanding at any particular time. The notes are offered on a continuous basis and bear interest at a floating rate per annum determined by the Duke Energy PremierNotes Committee, or its designee, on a weekly basis. The interest rate payable on notes held by an investor may vary based on the principal amount of the investment. The notes have no stated maturity date, are non-transferable and may be redeemed in whole or in part by Duke Energy or at the investor’s option at any time. The balance as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, was $897 million and $1,066 million, respectively. The notes are short-term debt obligations of Duke Energy and are reflected as Notes payable and commercial paper on Duke Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Money Pool and Intercompany Credit Agreements
The Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, are eligible to receive support for their short-term borrowing needs through participation with Duke Energy and certain of its subsidiaries in a money pool arrangement. Under this arrangement, those companies with short-term funds may provide short-term loans to affiliates participating in this arrangement. The money pool is structured such that the Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, separately manage their cash needs and working capital requirements. Accordingly, there is no net settlement of receivables and payables between money pool participants. Duke Energy (Parent), may loan funds to its participating subsidiaries, but may not borrow funds through the money pool. Accordingly, as the money pool activity is between Duke Energy and its subsidiary registrants.subsidiaries, all money pool balances are eliminated within Duke Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Money pool receivable balances are reflected within Notes receivable from affiliated companies on the Subsidiary Registrants’ Consolidated Balance Sheets. Money pool payable balances are reflected within either Notes payable to affiliated companies or Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies on the Subsidiary Registrants’ Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In March 2022, Progress Energy closed a revolving credit agreement with Duke Energy (Parent), which allowed up to $2.5 billion in intercompany borrowings.
165

 December 31, 2019
 Estimated                
 Useful   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Life Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)(Years) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Land  $2,091
 $520
 $884
 $449
 $435
 $150
 $117
 $388
Plant – Regulated                 
Electric generation, distribution and transmission15-100 111,739
 42,723
 48,142
 30,018
 18,124
 5,838
 15,032
 
Natural gas transmission and distribution4-73 9,839
 
 
 
 
 2,892
 
 6,947
Other buildings and improvements23-90 1,810
 714
 401
 162
 239
 269
 278
 148
Plant – Nonregulated                 
Electric generation, distribution and transmission5-30 5,103
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other buildings and improvements25-35 488
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nuclear fuel
 3,253
 1,891
 1,362
 1,362
 
 
 
 
Equipment3-25 2,313
 546
 665
 452
 213
 319
 205
 128
Construction in process
 6,102
 1,389
 2,149
 1,114
 1,035
 504
 381
 531
Other2-40 4,916
 1,139
 1,467
 1,046
 411
 269
 292
 304
Total property, plant and equipment(a)(e)
  147,654
 48,922
 55,070
 34,603
 20,457
 10,241
 16,305
 8,446
Total accumulated depreciation – regulated(b)(c)
  (43,419) (16,525) (17,159) (11,915) (5,236) (2,843) (5,233) (1,681)
Total accumulated depreciation – nonregulated(d)(e)
  (2,354) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Generation facilities to be retired, net  246
 
 246
 246
 
 
 
 
Total net property, plant and equipment  $102,127

$32,397

$38,157

$22,934

$15,221

$7,398
 $11,072
 $6,765
(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIncludes finance leases of $952 million, $211 million, $443 million, $308 million, $135 million and $10 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively, primarily within Plant – Regulated. The Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida amounts are net of $143 million, $17 million and $126 million, respectively, of accumulated amortization of finance leases.DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
(b)Includes $1,807 million, $1,082 million, $725 million and $725 million
Restrictive Debt Covenants
The Duke Energy Registrants’ debt and credit agreements contain various financial and other covenants. Duke Energy's Master Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring the debt-to-total capitalization ratio not to exceed 65% for each borrower, excluding Piedmont, and 70% for Piedmont. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements. As of accumulated amortization of nuclear fuel at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(c)Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of $6 million, $13 million and $3 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively.
(d)Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of $20 million at Duke Energy.
(e)Includes gross property, plant and equipment cost of consolidated VIEs of $5,747 million and accumulated depreciation of consolidated VIEs of $1,041 million at Duke Energy.
During the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy evaluated recoverabilitypresented approximately $131 million of long-term debt as current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a result of a technical default due to the bankruptcy filing of a Duke Energy customer. The Duke Energy Registrants were in compliance with all other covenants related to their debt agreements as of December 31, 2022. In addition, some credit agreements may allow for acceleration of payments or termination of the windagreements due to nonpayment, or acceleration of other significant indebtedness of the borrower or some of its subsidiaries. None of the debt or credit agreements contain material adverse change clauses.
Other Loans
As of December 31, 2022, and solar generation assets2021, Duke Energy had loans outstanding of $852 million, including $33 million at Duke Energy Progress and $819 million, including $34 million at Duke Energy Progress, respectively, against the cash surrender value of life insurance policies it owns on the lives of its executives. The amounts outstanding were carried as a reduction of the related cash surrender value that is included in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the minority interest saleConsolidated Balance Sheets.
8. GUARANTEES AND INDEMNIFICATIONS
Duke Energy has various financial and performance guarantees and indemnifications with non-consolidated entities, which are issued in the normal course of business. As discussed below, these contracts include performance guarantees, standby letters of credit, debt guarantees and indemnifications and include guarantees and indemnifications related to Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Duke Energy enters into these arrangements to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party. At December 31, 2022, Duke Energy does not believe conditions are likely for significant performance under these guarantees. To the extent liabilities are incurred as a result of the portfolio fair valueactivities covered by the guarantees, such liabilities are included on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On January 2, 2007, Duke Energy completed the spin-off of consideration received being less thanits previously wholly owned natural gas businesses to shareholders. Guarantees issued by Duke Energy or its affiliates, or assigned to Duke Energy prior to the carrying valuespin-off, remained with Duke Energy subsequent to the spin-off. Guarantees issued by Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (Spectra Capital) or its affiliates prior to the spin-off remained with Spectra Capital subsequent to the spin-off, except for guarantees that were later assigned to Duke Energy. Duke Energy has indemnified Spectra Capital against any losses incurred under certain of the assets and determinedguarantee obligations that remain with Spectra Capital. At December 31, 2022, the assetsmaximum potential amount of future payments associated with these guarantees were all recoverable. Additionally, in 2019,$40 million, the majority of which expire by 2028.
In October 2017, ACP executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. Duke Energy evaluated recoverabilityentered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of its renewable merchant plants principally located in the Electric Reliability CouncilACP revolving credit facility. In July 2020, ACP reduced the size of Texas West market duethe credit facility to declining market pricing and declining long-term forecasted energy prices, primarily driven by lower forecasted natural gas prices.$1.9 billion. Duke Energy determined thatEnergy's maximum exposure to loss under the assets were not impaired becauseterms of the carrying valueguarantee was $860 million as of $160 million approximates the aggregate estimated future cash flows. A continued decline in energy market pricing would likely result in a future impairment.

176




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT


 December 31, 2018
 Estimated                
 Useful   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Life Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)(Years) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Land  $2,072
 $472
 $868
 $445
 $423
 $136
 $116
 $448
Plant – Regulated                 
Electric generation, distribution and transmission15-100 100,706
 38,468
 42,760
 26,147
 16,613
 5,182
 14,292
 
Natural gas transmission and distribution12-80 8,808
 
 
 
 
 2,719
 
 6,089
Other buildings and improvements24-90 1,966
 681
 636
 295
 341
 270
 253
 126
Plant – Nonregulated                 
Electric generation, distribution and transmission5-30 4,410
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other buildings and improvements25-35 494
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Nuclear fuel  3,460
 1,898
 1,562
 1,562
 
 
 
 
Equipment3-55 2,141
 467
 565
 399
 166
 384
 178
 141
Construction in process  5,726
 1,678
 2,515
 1,659
 856
 412
 325
 382
Other3-40 4,675
 1,077
 1,354
 952
 393
 257
 279
 300
Total property, plant and equipment(a)(d)
  134,458
 44,741
 50,260
 31,459
 18,792
 9,360
 15,443
 7,486
Total accumulated depreciation – regulated(b)(c)(d)
  (41,079) (15,496) (16,398) (11,423) (4,968) (2,717) (4,914) (1,575)
Total accumulated depreciation – nonregulated(c)(d)
  (2,047) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Generation facilities to be retired, net  362
 
 362
 362
 
 
 
 
Total net property, plant and equipment  $91,694
 $29,245
 $34,224
 $20,398
 $13,824
 $6,643
 $10,529
 $5,911
(a)Includes finance leases of $1,237 million, $135 million, $257 million, $137 million, $120 million, $73 million and $35 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively, primarily within Plant – Regulated. The Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida amounts are net of $131 million, $14 million and $117 million, respectively, of accumulated amortization of finance leases.
(b)Includes $1,947 million, $1,087 million, $860 million and $860 million of accumulated amortization of nuclear fuel at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(c)Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of $61 million, $12 million, $20 million and $10 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively.
(d)Includes gross property, plant and equipment cost of consolidated VIEs of $4,007 million and accumulated depreciation of consolidated VIEs of $698 million at Duke Energy.
During the year ended December 31, 2017, Duke Energy recorded a pretax impairment charge of $69 million on a wholly owned non-contracted wind project. The impairment was recorded within Impairment charges on Duke Energy’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. $58 million2020. This amount represented 47% of the impairment related to property, plantoutstanding borrowings under the credit facility and equipment and $11 million ofwas recognized within Other Current Liabilities on the impairment related to a net intangible asset. The charge represents the excess carrying value over the estimated fair value of the project, which was based on a Level 3 Fair Value measurement that was determined from the income approach using discounted cash flows. The impairment was primarily due to the non-contracted wind project being located in a market that has experienced continued declining market pricing during 2017 and declining long-term forecasted energy and capacity prices, driven by low natural gas prices, additional renewable generation placed in service and lack of significant load growth.

177




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT


The following tables present capitalized interest, which includes the debt component of AFUDC.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
Duke Energy$159
 $161
 $128
Duke Energy Carolinas30
 35
 45
Progress Energy31
 51
 45
Duke Energy Progress28
 26
 21
Duke Energy Florida3
 25
 24
Duke Energy Ohio22
 17
 10
Duke Energy Indiana26
 27
 9
Piedmont26
 17
 12

12. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
GOODWILL
Duke Energy
The following table presents goodwill by reportable segment for Duke Energy included on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019,2020, of which $95 million was previously recognized due the adoption of new guidance for credit losses effective January 1, 2020. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. See Notes 4 and 2018.13 for more information.
In addition to the Spectra Capital and ACP revolving credit facility guarantees above, Duke Energy has issued performance guarantees to customers and other third parties that guarantee the payment and performance of other parties, including certain non-wholly owned entities, as well as guarantees of debt of certain non-consolidated entities. If such entities were to default on payments or performance, Duke Energy would be required under the guarantees to make payments on the obligations of these entities. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these guarantees as of December 31, 2022, was $33 million of which all expire between 2024 and 2030, with the remaining performance guarantees having no contractual expiration. Additionally, certain guarantees have uncapped maximum potential payments; however, Duke Energy does not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Duke Energy uses bank-issued standby letters of credit to secure the performance of wholly owned and non-wholly owned entities to a third party or customer. Under these arrangements, Duke Energy has payment obligations to the issuing bank that are triggered by a draw by the third party or customer due to the failure of the wholly owned or non-wholly owned entity to perform according to the terms of its underlying contract. At December 31, 2022, Duke Energy had issued a total of $667 million in letters of credit, which expire between 2023 and 2028. The unused amount under these letters of credit was $35 million.
Duke Energy recognized $2 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively, primarily in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the guarantees discussed above. As current estimates change, additional losses related to guarantees and indemnifications to third parties, which could be material, may be recorded by the Duke Energy Registrants in the future.
9. JOINT OWNERSHIP OF GENERATING AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants maintain ownership interests in certain jointly owned generating and transmission facilities. The Duke Energy Registrants are entitled to a share of the generating capacity and output of each unit equal to their respective ownership interests. The Duke Energy Registrants pay their ownership share of additional construction costs, fuel inventory purchases and operating expenses. The Duke Energy Registrants share of revenues and operating costs of the jointly owned facilities is included within the corresponding line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Each participant in the jointly owned facilities must provide its own financing.
 Electric Utilities
 Gas Utilities
 Commercial
  
(in millions)and Infrastructure
 and Infrastructure
 Renewables
 Total
Goodwill Balance at December 31, 2018$17,379
 $1,924
 $122
 $19,425
Accumulated impairment charges(a)

 
 (122) (122)
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2018, adjusted for accumulated impairment charges$17,379
 $1,924
 $
 $19,303
        
Goodwill Balance at December 31, 2019$17,379
 $1,924
 $122
 $19,425
Accumulated impairment charges(a)

 
 (122) (122)
Goodwill balance at December 31, 2019, adjusted for accumulated impairment charges$17,379
 $1,924
 $
 $19,303
166


FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJOINT OWNERSHIP OF GENERATING AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
The following table presents the Duke Energy Registrants' interest of jointly owned plant or facilities and amounts included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All facilities are operated by the Duke Energy Registrants and are included in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment.
 December 31, 2022
Construction
OwnershipProperty, PlantAccumulatedWork in
(in millions except for ownership interest)Interestand EquipmentDepreciationProgress
Duke Energy Carolinas    
Catawba (units 1 and 2)(a)
19.25 %$1,047 $546 $32 
W.S. Lee CC(b)
87.27 %613 86 48 
Duke Energy Indiana    
Gibson (unit 5)(c)
50.05 %450 241 2 
Vermillion(d)
62.50 %182 113 1 
Transmission and local facilities(c)
Various6,718 1,510 157 
(a)    Jointly owned with North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, NCEMC and PMPA.
(b)    Jointly owned with NCEMC.
(c)    Jointly owned with WVPA and IMPA.
(d)    Jointly owned with WVPA.
10. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Duke Energy records an ARO when it has a legal obligation to incur retirement costs associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the obligation can be reasonably estimated. Certain assets of the Duke Energy Registrants have an indeterminate life, such as transmission and distribution facilities, and thus the fair value of the retirement obligation is not reasonably estimable. A liability for these AROs will be recorded when a fair value is determinable.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated operations accrue costs of removal for property that does not have an associated legal retirement obligation based on regulatory orders from state commissions. These costs of removal are recorded as a regulatory liability in accordance with regulatory accounting treatment. The Duke Energy Registrants do not accrue the estimated cost of removal for any nonregulated assets. See Note 4 for the estimated cost of removal for assets without an associated legal retirement obligation, which are included in Regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents the AROs recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Decommissioning of nuclear power facilities(a)
$7,261 $3,009 $4,217 $3,948 $270 $ $ $ 
Closure of ash impoundments5,176 2,309 1,862 1,833 29 95 911  
Other291 64 102 42 59 59 40 26 
Total asset retirement obligation$12,728 $5,382 $6,181 $5,823 $358 $154 $951 $26 
Less: Current portion773 261 289 288 1 17 207  
Total noncurrent asset retirement obligation$11,955 $5,121 $5,892 $5,535 $357 $137 $744 $26 
(a)    Duke Energy amount includes purchase accounting adjustments related to the merger with Progress Energy.
Nuclear Decommissioning Liability
AROs related to nuclear decommissioning are based on site-specific cost studies. The NCUC, PSCSC and FPSC require updated cost estimates for decommissioning nuclear plants every five years.
The following table summarizes information about the most recent site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost studies. Decommissioning costs are stated in 2018 or 2019 dollars, depending on the year of the cost study, and include costs to decommission plant components not subject to radioactive contamination.
Annual FundingDecommissioning
(in millions)
Requirement(a)
Costs(a)
Year of Cost Study
Duke Energy$10 $9,105 2018 or 2019
Duke Energy Carolinas(b)(c)
 4,365 2018
Duke Energy Progress(d)
10 4,181 2019
Duke Energy Florida(e)
 559 N/A
167

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
(a)    Amount represents annual funding requirement for the current fiscal year. Amounts for Progress Energy equal the sum of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
(b)    Decommissioning costs for Duke Energy Carolinas reflects its ownership interest in jointly owned reactors. Other joint owners are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their interest in the reactors.
(c)    Duke Energy Carolinas' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2018 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019. A new funding study was also completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019.
(d)    Duke Energy Progress' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2019 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in March 2020. Duke Energy Progress also completed a funding study, which was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in July 2020. In October 2021, Duke Energy Progress filed the 2019 nuclear decommissioning cost study with the FERC, as well as a revised rate schedule for decommissioning expense to be collected from wholesale customers. The FERC accepted the filing, as filed on December 9, 2021.
(e)    During 2019, Duke Energy Florida reached an agreement to transfer decommissioning work for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party and decommissioning costs are based on the agreement with this third party rather than a cost study. Regulatory approval was received from the NRC and the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida each maintain NDTFs that are intended to pay for the decommissioning costs of their respective nuclear power plants. The NDTF investments are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies including the NRC, FERC, NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC and the IRS.
Use of the NDTF investments is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities including license termination, spent fuel and site restoration. The license termination and spent fuel obligations relate to contaminated decommissioning and are recorded as AROs. The site restoration obligation relates to non-contaminated decommissioning and is recorded to cost of removal within Regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents the fair value of NDTF assets legally restricted for purposes of settling AROs associated with nuclear decommissioning. Duke Energy Florida entered into an agreement with a third party to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and was granted an exemption from the NRC, which allows for use of the NDTF for all aspects of nuclear decommissioning. The entire balance of Duke Energy Florida's NDTF may be applied toward license termination, spent fuel and site restoration costs incurred to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and is excluded from the table below. See Note 17 for additional information related to the fair value of the Duke Energy Registrants' NDTFs.
December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Duke Energy$7,466 $8,933 
Duke Energy Carolinas4,208 5,068 
Duke Energy Progress3,258 3,865 
Nuclear Operating Licenses
As described in Note 4, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. The following table includes the current expiration of nuclear operating licenses.
UnitYear of Expiration
Duke Energy Carolinas
Catawba Units 1 and 22043
(a)McGuire Unit 12041
McGuire Unit 22043
Oconee Units 1 and 22033
Oconee Unit 32034
Duke Energy evaluated the recoverability of goodwill during 2018 and 2017 and recorded impairment charges of $93 million and $29 million, respectively, related to the Commercial Renewables reporting unit included in Impairment charges on Duke Energy’s Consolidated Statements of Operations. The fair value of the reporting unit was determined based on the income approach and market approach in 2018 and 2017, respectively. See "Goodwill Impairment Testing" below for the results of the 2019 goodwill impairment test.Progress
Brunswick Unit 12036
Brunswick Unit 22034
Harris2046
Robinson2030
The NRC has acknowledged permanent cessation of operation and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessel at Crystal River Unit 3. Therefore, the license no longer authorizes operation of the reactor. During 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into an agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3. Regulatory approval was received from the NRC and the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively. See Note 4 for more information.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio has two reportable segments, EU&I and GU&I.
EU&I transmits and distributes electricity in portions of Ohio and generates, distributes and sells electricity in portions of Northern Kentucky. GU&I transports and sells natural gas in portions of Ohio and Northern Kentucky. Both reportable segments conduct operations primarily through Duke Energy Ohio and its wholly owned subsidiary, Duke Energy Kentucky. The remainder of Duke Energy Ohio's operations is presented as Other.
All Duke Energy Ohio assets and revenues from continuing operations are within the U.S.
Year Ended December 31, 2022
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,798 $716 $2,514 $ $ $2,514 
Interest expense$86 $43 $129 $ $ $129 
Depreciation and amortization221 103 324   324 
Income tax expense (benefit)24 (43)(19)(2) (21)
Segment income (loss)/Net income189 121 310 (8) 302 
Capital expenditures$488 $362 $850 $ $ $850 
Segment assets7,504 4,164 11,668 14 (176)11,506 
133

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSBUSINESS SEGMENTS
Year Ended December 31, 2021
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,493 $544 $2,037 $— $— $2,037 
Interest expense$87 $24 $111 $— $— $111 
Depreciation and amortization217 90 307 — — 307 
Income tax expense (benefit)15 19 34 (4)— 30 
Segment income (loss)/Net Income141 78 219 (15)— 204 
Capital expenditures$486 $362 $848 $— $— $848 
Segment assets6,882 3,892 10,774 29 (29)10,774 
Year Ended December 31, 2020
ElectricGasTotal
Utilities andUtilities andReportable
(in millions)InfrastructureInfrastructureSegmentsOtherEliminationsTotal
Total revenues$1,405 $453 $1,858 $— $— $1,858 
Interest expense$85 $17 $102 $— $— $102 
Depreciation and amortization200 78 278 — — 278 
Income tax expense (benefit)19 26 45 (2)— 43 
Segment income (loss)162 96 258 (6)— 252 
Capital expenditures$548 $286 $834 $— $— $834 
Segment assets6,615 3,380 9,995 32 (2)10,025 
4. REGULATORY MATTERS
REGULATORY ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants record regulatory assets and liabilities that result from the ratemaking process. See Note 1 for further information.
134

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy and Progress Energy. See separate tables below for balances by individual registrant.
Duke EnergyProgress Energy
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Regulatory Assets
AROs – coal ash$3,205 $3,408 $1,429 $1,399 
AROs – nuclear and other945 684 884 620 
Deferred fuel and purchased power3,866 1,253 2,060 718 
Accrued pension and OPEB2,336 2,017 759 725 
Storm cost securitized balance, net940 991 720 759 
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 881 937 
Debt fair value adjustment829 884  — 
Storm cost deferrals666 213 559 189 
Hedge costs deferrals378 348 128 137 
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses342 356 42 47 
Retired generation facilities316 357 243 265 
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA288 317 21 21 
Advanced metering infrastructure (AMI)283 311 111 130 
Customer connect project271 242 136 124 
Costs of removal regulatory asset221 107 221 107 
Vacation accrual222 221 43 42 
Incremental COVID-19 expenses210 87 78 28 
CEP deferral190 161  — 
Demand side management (DSM)/Energy efficiency (EE)189 235 188 230 
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts168 139  — 
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 157 165 
Nuclear deferral154 120 64 42 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs121 108  — 
COR settlement120 123 32 32 
Deferred coal ash handling system costs92 90 25 23 
Qualifying facility contract buyouts81 94 81 94 
Amounts due from customers57 85  — 
Propane caverns26 —  — 
Deferred severance charges21 54 7 18 
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104  — 
Other555 426 110 87 
Total regulatory assets18,130 14,637 8,979 6,939 
Less: current portion3,485 2,150 1,833 1,030 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$14,645 $12,487 $7,146 $5,909 
Regulatory Liabilities
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$6,462 $7,199 $2,192 $2,394 
Costs of removal5,151 6,150 2,269 2,955 
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053  — 
Hedge cost deferrals683 364 252 155 
Accrued pension and OPEB211 213  — 
DOE Settlement154 — 154 — 
Provision for rate refunds78 274 28 87 
Amounts to be refunded to customers45 —  — 
Other1,226 1,110 434 453 
Total regulatory liabilities15,048 17,363 5,329 6,044 
Less: current portion1,466 1,211 576 478 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$13,582 $16,152 $4,753 $5,566 
Descriptions of regulatory assets and liabilities summarized in the tables above and below follow. See tables below for recovery and amortization periods at the separate registrants.
AROs coal ash. Represents deferred depreciation and accretion related to the legal obligation to close ash basins. The costs are deferred until recovery treatment has been determined. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
135

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
AROs nuclear and other. Represents regulatory assets or liabilities, including deferred depreciation and accretion, related to legal obligations associated with the future retirement of property, plant and equipment, excluding amounts related to coal ash. The AROs relate primarily to decommissioning nuclear power facilities. The amounts also include certain deferred gains and losses on NDTF investments. See Notes 1 and 10 for additional information.
Deferred fuel and purchased power. Represents certain energy-related costs that are recoverable or refundable as approved by the applicable regulatory body.
Accrued pension and OPEB. Accrued pension and OPEB represent regulatory assets and liabilities related to each of the Duke Energy Registrants’ respective shares of unrecognized actuarial gains and losses and unrecognized prior service cost and credit attributable to Duke Energy’s pension plans and OPEB plans. The regulatory asset or liability is amortized with the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and prior service cost and credit to net periodic benefit costs for pension and OPEB plans. The accrued pension and OPEB regulatory assets are expected to be recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Storm cost securitized balance, net. Represents the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego (2018 and 2019 events).
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net.Represents the balance associated with Crystal River Unit 3 retirement approved for recovery by the FPSC on September 15, 2015, and the upfront financing costs securitized in 2016 with issuance of the associated bonds. The regulatory asset balance is net of the AFUDC equity portion.
Debt fair value adjustment. Purchase accounting adjustments recorded to state the carrying value of Progress Energy and Piedmont at fair value in connection with the 2012 and 2016 mergers, respectively. Amount is amortized over the life of the related debt.
Storm cost deferrals. Represents deferred incremental costs incurred related to major weather-related events.
Hedge costs deferrals. Amounts relate to unrealized gains and losses on derivatives recorded as a regulatory asset or liability, respectively, until the contracts are settled.
Post-in-service carrying costs (PISCC) and deferred operating expenses. Represents deferred depreciation and operating expenses as well as carrying costs on the portion of capital expenditures placed in service but not yet reflected in retail rates as plant in service.
Retired generation facilities. Represents amounts to be recovered for facilities that have been retired and are probable of recovery.
Deferred asset – Lee and Harris COLA. Represents deferred costs incurred for the canceled Lee and Harris nuclear projects.
AMI. Represents deferred costs related to the installation of AMI meters and remaining net book value of non-AMI meters to be replaced at Duke Energy Carolinas, net book value of existing meters at Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Ohio and future recovery of net book value of electromechanical meters that have been replaced with AMI meters at Duke Energy Indiana.
Customer connect project. Represents incremental operating expenses and carrying costs on deferred amounts related to the deployment of the new customer information system.
Vacation accrual. Represents vacation entitlement, which is generally recovered in the following year.
Incremental COVID-19 expenses. Representsincremental costs related to ensuring continuity and quality of service in a safe manner during the COVID-19 pandemic.
CEP deferral. Represents deferred depreciation, PISCC and deferred property tax for Duke Energy Ohio Gas capital assets for the Capital Expenditure Program (CEP).
DSM/EE. Deferred costs related to various DSM and EE programs recoverable through various mechanisms.
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts. Represents costs for certain long-dated, fixed quantity forward natural gas supply contracts, which are recoverable through PGA clauses.
NCEMPA deferrals. Represents retail allocated cost deferrals and returns associated with the additional ownership interest in assets acquired from NCEMPA in 2015.
Nuclear deferral. Includes amounts related to levelizing nuclear plant outage costs, which allows for the recognition of nuclear outage expenses over the refueling cycle rather than when the outage occurs, resulting in the deferral of operations and maintenance costs associated with refueling.
Deferred pipeline integrity costs. Represents pipeline integrity management costs in compliance with federal regulations.
COR settlement. Represents approved COR settlements that are being amortized over the average remaining lives, at the time of approval, of the associated assets.
Deferred coal ash handling system costs. Represents deferred depreciation and returns associated with capital assets related to converting the ash handling system from wet to dry.
Qualifying facility contract buyouts. Represents termination payments for regulatory recovery through the capacity clause.
Amounts due from customers. Relates primarily to margin decoupling and IMR recovery mechanisms.
136

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Costs of removal regulatory asset. Represents the excess of spend over funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired, net of certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
Propane Caverns. Represents amounts for costs related to propane inventory, the net book value of remaining assets and decommissioning costs at Duke Energy Ohio.
MGP. Represents remediation costs incurred at former MGP sites and the deferral of costs to be incurred at Duke Energy Ohio's East End and West End sites.
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes. Amounts for all registrants include regulatory liabilities related primarily to impacts from the Tax Act. See Note 24 for additional information. Amounts have no immediate impact on rate base as regulatory assets are offset by deferred tax liabilities.
Costs of removal. Represents funds received from customers to cover the future removal of property, plant and equipment from retired or abandoned sites as property is retired. Also includes certain deferred gains on NDTF investments.
DOE Settlement. Represents litigation settlement funds received resulting from the DOE’s failure to accept spent nuclear fuel and other radioactive waste from the Crystal River Unit 3 during 2014-2018 as required under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act.
Provision for rate refunds. Represents estimated amounts due to customers based on recording interim rates subject to refund.
RESTRICTIONS ON THE ABILITY OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES TO MAKE DIVIDENDS, ADVANCES AND LOANS TO DUKE ENERGY
As a condition to the approval of merger transactions, the NCUC, PSCSC, PUCO, KPSC and IURC imposed conditions on the ability of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Kentucky, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont to transfer funds to Duke Energy through loans or advances, as well as restricted amounts available to pay dividends to Duke Energy. Certain subsidiaries may transfer funds to the Parent by obtaining approval of the respective state regulatory commissions. These conditions imposed restrictions on the ability of the public utility subsidiaries to pay cash dividends as discussed below.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida also have restrictions imposed by their first mortgage bond indentures, which in certain circumstances, limit their ability to make cash dividends or distributions on common stock. Amounts restricted as a result of these provisions were not material at December 31, 2022.
Additionally, certain other subsidiaries of Duke Energy have restrictions on their ability to dividend, loan or advance funds to Duke Energy due to specific legal or regulatory restrictions, including, but not limited to, minimum working capital and tangible net worth requirements.
The restrictions discussed below were not a material amount of Duke Energy's and Progress Energy's net assets at December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Duke Energy Carolinas must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to mergers to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Progress
Duke Energy Progress must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the mergers between Duke Energy and Progress Energy and Duke Energy and Piedmont to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the respective mergers, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without the prior authorization of the PUCO. Duke Energy Ohio received FERC and PUCO approval to pay dividends from its equity accounts that are reflective of the amount that it would have in its retained earnings account had push-down accounting for the Cinergy merger not been applied to Duke Energy Ohio’s balance sheet. The conditions include a commitment from Duke Energy Ohio that equity, adjusted to remove the impacts of push-down accounting, will not fall below 30% of total capital.
Duke Energy Kentucky is required to pay dividends solely out of retained earnings and to maintain a minimum of 35% equity in its capital structure.
Duke Energy Indiana
Duke Energy Indiana must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the merger between Duke Energy and Cinergy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded. In addition, Duke Energy Indiana will not declare and pay dividends out of capital or unearned surplus without prior authorization of the IURC.
Piedmont
Piedmont must limit cumulative distributions subsequent to the acquisition of Piedmont by Duke Energy to (i) the amount of retained earnings on the day prior to the closing of the merger, plus (ii) any future earnings recorded.
RATE-RELATED INFORMATION
The NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC, IURC, PUCO, TPUC and KPSC approve rates for retail electric and natural gas services within their states. The FERC approves rates for electric sales to wholesale customers served under cost-based rates (excluding Ohio and Indiana), as well as sales of transmission service. The FERC also regulates certification and siting of new interstate natural gas pipeline projects.
137

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress
Hurricane Ian
In late September and early October 2022, Hurricane Ian inflicted severe damage to the Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress territories in North Carolina and South Carolina. Approximately 950,000 customers were impacted. Total estimated operation and maintenance expenses incurred for restoration efforts for the year ended December 31, 2022, were approximately $100 million, with an additional $9 million in capital investments. Approximately $83 million of the operation and maintenance expenses are deferred in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 ($40 million and $43 million for Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively). Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have regulatory tools to recover storm costs including deferral and securitization. These estimates could change as Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress receive additional information on actual costs.
Carbon Plan Proceeding
On October 13, 2021, North Carolina enacted legislation (Energy Solutions for North Carolina or HB 951) that established a framework overseen by the NCUC to advance North Carolina CO2 emission reductions from electric generating facilities in the state through the use of least cost planning while providing for continued reliability and affordable rates for customers. Among other things, HB 951 directed that the NCUC approve an initial carbon plan (Carbon Plan) by December 31, 2022, taking all reasonable steps to achieve a 70% reduction in CO2 emissions from public utilities’ electric generating facilities in the state by 2030 (from 2005 levels) and achieve carbon neutrality from electric generating facilities by 2050 while maintaining affordability and reliability for customers. On May 16, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress filed their proposed Carolinas Carbon Plan (Proposed Plan) with the NCUC.
The NCUC issued an order on December 30, 2022, adopting the first Carbon Plan. The order recognizes the value of an “all-of-the-above” approach to achieving CO2 emission reductions and established a set of near-term procurement and development activities needed to continue progress towards the targeted CO2 reductions, along with the schedule for the future biennial updates to the Carbon Plan. The approved near-term action plan includes procurement and development of solar, storage and hydrogen-capable natural gas generation at levels consistent with the Proposed Plan, along with upgrading key transmission facilities to strengthen the grid, improve resilience for customers and interconnect new solar generation and stakeholder engagement activities for onshore wind generation (in all cases, subject to any further applicable regulatory processes). The order also approved early development activities for long lead-time resources, including new nuclear, pumped-hydro storage and offshore wind transmission development. The NCUC affirmed the utility ownership structure required in HB 951; all new generation facilities or other resources selected by the NCUC to achieve the CO2 emission reductions shall be owned and recovered on a cost-of-service basis by the utilities, with a carveout for 45% of solar and solar plus storage generation to be procured through long-term purchase power agreements with third parties. The order approves continued utilization of the remaining coal-fired generation assets, ensuring that appropriate replacement generating units and associated transmission infrastructure are in service before existing generating units are retired and providing an orderly transition out of coal generation by 2035.
Storm Cost Securitization Legislation
On June 15, 2022, the South Carolina General Assembly unanimously adopted S. 1077 (Act 227) in both the House and Senate and the bill was signed into law on June 17, 2022. The legislation enables the PSCSC to permit the issuance of bonds for the payment of storm costs and the creation of a storm charge for repayment.
On August 5, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a petition with the PSCSC for review and approval of deferred storm costs to be securitized of approximately $223 million. The evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin on or after March 1, 2023. On February 7, 2023, a stipulation was reached with all parties in the proceeding regarding certain items identified through the Office of Regulatory Staff (ORS) audit of storm costs. The final amount for securitization will depend on the outcome of the hearing.Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
138

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Carolinas
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Carolinas' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$1,391 $1,227 (g)(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(i)
1,614 339 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
614 365 Yes(h)
Storm cost securitized balance, net220 232 2041
Storm cost deferrals
93 22 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
228 171 Yes(b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
30 31 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
39 54 Yes(b)
Deferred asset – Lee COLA267 296 (b)
AMI139 140 Yes(b)
Customer connect project62 66 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual84 83 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses127 51 Yes(b)
Nuclear deferral90 78 2024
COR settlement88 91 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs67 67 Yes(b)
Other235 166 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,388 3,479 
Less: current portion1,095 544 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,293 $2,935 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(d)
$2,475 $2,785 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
1,769 2,009 Yes(f)
AROs – nuclear and other1,038 2,053 (b)
Hedge cost deferrals
350 209 (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
44 44 Yes(h)
Provision for rate refunds50 124 Yes(b)
Other587 461 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities6,313 7,685 
Less: current portion530 487 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$5,783 $7,198 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)     Included in rate base.
(d)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(i)    Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in May 2022 for recovery of $327 million, which included deferrals through January 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through August 2023. The next filing will be made in the first quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in July 2022 for recovery of $79 million, which included deferrals through May 2022. The amount is expected to be recovered through September 2023. The next filing will be made in the third quarter of 2023.
2023 North Carolina Rate Case
On January 19, 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The PBR Application includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $501 million in Year 1, $172 million in Year 2 and $150 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $823 million or 15.7% by early 2026. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Carolinas plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on September 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by January 1, 2024. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
139

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Oconee Nuclear Station Subsequent License Renewal
On June 7, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a subsequent license renewal (SLR) application for the Oconee Nuclear Station (ONS) with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) to renew ONS’s operating license for an additional 20 years. The SLR would extend operations of the facility from 60 to 80 years. The current licenses for units 1 and 2 expire in 2033 and the license for unit 3 expires in 2034. By a Federal Register Notice dated July 28, 2021, the NRC provided a 60-day comment period for persons whose interest may be affected by the issuance of a subsequent renewed license for ONS to file a request for a hearing and a petition for leave to intervene. On September 27, 2021, Beyond Nuclear and Sierra Club (Petitioners) filed a Hearing Request and Petition to Intervene (Hearing Request) and a Petition for Waiver. The Hearing Request proposed three contentions and claimed that Duke Energy Carolinas did not satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, as amended, or the NRC’s NEPA-implementing regulations. Following Duke Energy Carolinas' answer and the Petitioners' reply, on February 11, 2022, the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board (ASLB) issued its decision on the Hearing Request and found that the Petitioners failed to establish that the proposed contentions are litigable. The ASLB also denied the Petitioners' Petition for Waiver and terminated the proceeding.
On February 24, 2022, the NRC issued a decision in the SLR appeal related to Florida Power and Light's Turkey Point nuclear generating station in Florida. The NRC ruled that the NRC’s license renewal Generic Environmental Impact Statement (GEIS) does not apply to SLR because the GEIS does not address SLR. The decision overturned a 2020 NRC decision that found the GEIS applies to SLR. Although Turkey Point is not owned or operated by a Duke Energy Registrant, the NRC’s order applies to all SLR applicants, including ONS. The NRC order also indicated no subsequent renewed licenses will be issued until the NRC staff has completed an adequate NEPA review for each application. On April 5, 2022, the NRC approved a 24-month rulemaking plan that will enable the NRC staff to complete an adequate NEPA review. Although an SLR applicant may wait until the rulemaking is completed, the NRC also noted that an applicant may submit a supplement to its environmental report providing information on environmental impacts during the SLR period prior to the rulemaking being completed. On November 7, 2022, Duke Energy Carolinas submitted a supplement to its environmental report addressing environmental impacts during the SLR period. On December 19, 2022, the NRC published a notice in the Federal Register that the NRC will conduct a limited scoping process to gather additional information necessary to prepare an environmental impact statement (EIS) to evaluate the environmental impacts at ONS during the SLR period. The NRC received comments from the EPA and the Petitioners and these comments identify eighteen potential impacts that should be considered by the NRC in the EIS, which include, but are not limited to, climate change and flooding, environmental justice, severe accidents, and external events. Currently, the NRC expects to publish a draft EIS in October 2023.
On December 19, 2022, the NRC issued the Safety Evaluation Report (SER) for the safety portion of the SLR application. The NRC determined Duke Energy Carolinas met the requirements of the applicable regulations and identified actions that have been taken or will be taken to manage the effects of aging and address time-limited analyses. Duke Energy Carolinas and the NRC met with the Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards (ACRS) on February 2, 2023, to discuss issues regarding the SER and SLR application, after which the ACRS will issue a report discussing the result of its review.
Although the NRC’s GEIS applicability decision will delay completion of the SLR proceeding, Duke Energy Carolinas does not believe it changes the probability that the ONS subsequent renewed licenses will ultimately be issued, although Duke Energy Carolinas cannot guarantee the outcome of the license application process.
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. New depreciation rates were implemented for all of the nuclear facilities during the second quarter of 2021. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of these additional relicensing proceedings.
140

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Progress
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Progress' Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$1,418 $1,389 (g)(b)
AROs – nuclear and other869 613 (c)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(l)
705 303 (e)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(d)
417 351 Yes(j)
Storm cost securitized balance, net720 759 2041
Storm cost deferrals
234 170 Yes(b)
Hedge costs deferrals
55 60 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses42 47 Yes2054
Retired generation facilities
149 171 Yes(b)
Deferred asset - Harris COLA21 21 (b)
AMI81 92 Yes(b)
Customer connect project
54 57 Yes(b)
Vacation accrual
43 42 2023
Incremental COVID-19 expenses78 28 Yes(b)
DSM/EE(d)
180 218 (h)(h)
NCEMPA deferrals157 165 (f)2042
Nuclear deferral64 42 2024
COR settlement32 32 Yes(b)
Deferred coal ash handling system costs25 23 Yes(b)
Other70 68 (b)
Total regulatory assets5,414 4,651 
Less: current portion690 533 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$4,724 $4,118 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(k)
$1,559 $1,695 (b)
Costs of removal(d)
2,269 2,955 Yes(i)
Hedge cost deferrals252 155 (b)
Provision for rate refunds28 87 Yes(b)
Other344 357 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities4,452 5,249 
Less: current portion332 381 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$4,120 $4,868 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Recovery period for costs related to nuclear facilities runs through the decommissioning period of each unit.
(d)    Included in rate base.
(e)    Pays interest on over-recovered costs in North Carolina. Includes certain purchased power costs in North Carolina and South Carolina and costs of distributed energy in South Carolina.
(f)    South Carolina retail allocated costs are earning a return.
(g)    Earns a debt and equity return on coal ash expenditures for North Carolina and South Carolina retail customers as permitted by various regulatory orders.
(h)    Includes incentives on DSM/EE investments and is recovered through an annual rider mechanism.
(i)    Recovered over the life of the associated assets.
(j)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(k)    Includes regulatory liabilities related to the change in the federal tax rate as a result of the Tax Act and the change in the North Carolina tax rate, both discussed in Note 24. Portions are included in rate base.
(l)    Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the NCUC in August 2022 for recovery of $251 million, which included deferrals through June 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through November 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023. Duke Energy Progress submitted a fuel filing to the PSCSC in April 2022 for recovery of $44 million, which included deferrals through February 2022. This amount is expected to be recovered through June 2023. The next filing will be made in the second quarter of 2023.
141

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2022 North Carolina Rate Case
On October 6, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed a PBR application with the NCUC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. The rate request before the NCUC includes an MYRP to recover projected capital investments during the three year MYRP period. In addition to the MYRP, the PBR Application includes an Earnings Sharing Mechanism, Residential Decoupling Mechanism and Performance Incentive Mechanisms as required by HB 951. If approved, the overall retail revenue increase would be $326 million in Year 1, $151 million in Year 2 and $138 million in Year 3, for a combined total of $615 million or 16% by late 2025. The rate increase is driven primarily by major transmission and distribution investments since the last rate case and projected in the MYRP, as well as investments in energy storage and solar assets included in the MYRP consistent with the Carbon Plan. Duke Energy Progress plans to implement temporary rates, subject to refund, on June 1, 2023, and has requested permanent rates be effective by October 1, 2023. The evidentiary hearing has been scheduled to begin on May 1, 2023. Duke Energy Progress cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On September 1, 2022, Duke Energy Progress filed an application with the PSCSC to request an increase in base rate retail revenues. On January 12, 2023, Duke Energy Progress and the ORS, as well as other consumer, environmental, and industrial intervening parties, filed a comprehensive Agreement and Stipulation of Settlement resolving all issues in the base rate proceeding. The major components of the stipulation include:
A $52 million annual customer rate increase prior to the reduction from the accelerated return to customers of federal unprotected Property, Plant and Equipment related EDIT. After extending the remaining EDIT giveback to customers to 33 months, the net annual retail rate increase is approximately $36 million.
ROE of 9.6% based upon a capital structure of 52.43% equity and 47.57% debt.
Continuation of deferral treatment of coal ash basin closure costs. Supports an amortization period for remaining coal ash closure costs in this rate case of seven years. Duke Energy Progress agreed not to seek recovery of approximately $50 million of deferred coal ash expenditures related to retired sites in this rate case (South Carolina retail allocation).
Accepts the 2021 Depreciation Study as proposed in this case, as adjusted for certain recommendations from ORS and includes accelerated retirement dates for certain coal units as originally proposed.
Establishment of a storm reserve to help offset the costs of major storms.
The PSCSC held a hearing on January 17, 2023, to consider evidence supporting the stipulation and unanimously voted to approve the comprehensive agreement on February 9, 2023. The PSCSC voted to allow Duke Energy Progress to implement new customer rates by April 1, 2023. A final written order is due from the PSCSC by March 1, 2023.
FERC Return on Equity Complaint
On October 16, 2020, North Carolina Electric Membership Corporation (NCEMC) filed a complaint at the FERC against Duke Energy Progress pursuant to Section 206 of the Federal Power Act (FPA), alleging that the 11% stated ROE component in the demand formula rate in the Power Supply and Coordination Agreement between NCEMC and Duke Energy Progress is unjust and unreasonable. On June 16, 2022, Duke Energy Progress submitted to the FERC an Offer of Settlement and Settlement Agreement (Settlement Agreement) between NCEMC and Duke Energy Progress. The Settlement Agreement provides for an ROE of 10%, effective January 1, 2022, among other contract modifications. On November 7, 2022, the FERC approved the Settlement Agreement.
142

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Florida
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash
$11 $10 (b)
AROs – nuclear and other
15 (b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power(h)
1,355 415 (f)2024
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
342 374 Yes(g)
Nuclear asset securitized balance, net881 937 2036
Storm cost deferrals(c)
325 19 (f)(b)
Hedge costs deferrals(c)
73 77 Yes2038
Retired generation facilities(c)
94 94 Yes2044
AMI(c)
30 38 Yes2032
Customer connect project(c)
82 67 Yes2037
Costs of removal regulatory asset(c)
221 107 (d)(b)
Qualifying facility contract buyouts(c)
81 94 Yes2034
Other55 49 (d)(b)
Total regulatory assets3,565 2,288 
Less: current portion1,143 497 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$2,422 $1,791 
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes(c)
$633 $699 (b)
DOE Settlement154 — 
Other90 97 (d)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities877 796 
Less: current portion244 98 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$633 $698 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(e)    Earns a debt return/interest once collections begin.
(f)    Earns commercial paper rate.
(g)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
(h)    Duke Energy Florida submitted a fuel filing to the FPSC in January 2023 for recovery of $795 million, which included the 2022 actual under-recovery of $1.2 billion, offset by projected declining fuel costs in 2023 due to lower natural gas prices. The expected recovery period is April 2023 through March 2024.
2021 Settlement Agreement
On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed a Settlement Agreement (the “2021 Settlement”) with the FPSC. The parties to the 2021 Settlement include Duke Energy Florida, the Office of Public Counsel (OPC), the Florida Industrial Power Users Group, White Springs Agricultural Chemicals, Inc. d/b/a PCS Phosphate and NUCOR Steel Florida, Inc. (collectively, the “Parties”).
Pursuant to the 2021 Settlement, the Parties agreed to a base rate stay-out provision that expires year-end 2024; however, Duke Energy Florida is allowed an increase to its base rates of an incremental $67 million in 2022, $49 million in 2023 and $79 million in 2024, subject to adjustment in the event of tax reform during the years 2021, 2022 and 2023. The Parties also agreed to an ROE band of 8.85% to 10.85% with a midpoint of 9.85% based on a capital structure of 53% equity and 47% debt. The ROE band can be increased by 25 basis points if the average 30-year U.S. Treasury rate increases 50 basis points or more over a six-month period in which case the midpoint ROE would rise from 9.85% to 10.10%. On July 25, 2022, this provision was triggered. Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on August 12, 2022, to increase the ROE effective August 2022 with a base rate increase effective January 1, 2023. The FPSC approved this request on October 4, 2022. The 2021 Settlement Agreement also provided that Duke Energy Florida will be able to retain the $173 million retail portion of the expected DOE award from its lawsuit to recover spent nuclear fuel to mitigate customer rates over the term of the 2021 Settlement. In return, Duke Energy Florida is permitted to recognize the $173 million into earnings through the approved settlement period. The full amount of the $173 million is expected to be recognized between the years of 2023 and 2024, while also remaining within the approved ROE band. Duke Energy Florida settled the DOE lawsuit and received payment of approximately $180 million on June 15, 2022, of which the retail portion was approximately $154 million. The 2021 Settlement authorizes Duke Energy Florida to collect the difference between $173 million and the $154 million retail portion of the amount received through the capacity cost recovery clause.
143

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
The 2021 Settlement also contained a provision to recover or flow-back the effects of tax law changes. As a result of the IRA enacted on August 16, 2022, Duke Energy Florida is eligible for PTCs associated with solar facilities placed in service beginning in January 2022. Duke Energy Florida filed a petition with the FPSC on October 17, 2022, to reduce base rates effective January 1, 2023, by $56 million to flow back the expected 2023 PTCs and to flow back the expected 2022 PTCs via an adjustment to the capacity cost recovery clause. On December 14, 2022, the FPSC issued an order approving Duke Energy Florida’s petition. See Note 24 for additional information on the IRA.
In addition to these terms, the 2021 Settlement contained provisions related to the accelerated depreciation of Crystal River Units 4-5, the approval of approximately $1 billion in future investments in new cost-effective solar power, the implementation of a new Electric Vehicle Charging Station Program and the deferral and recovery of costs in connection with the implementation of Duke Energy Florida’s Vision Florida program, which explores various emerging non-carbon emitting generation technology, distributed technologies and resiliency projects, among other things. The 2021 Settlement also resolved remaining unrecovered storm costs for Hurricane Michael and Hurricane Dorian.
The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021, issuing an order on June 4, 2021. Revised customer rates became effective January 1, 2022, with subsequent base rate increases effective January 1, 2023, and January 1, 2024.
Clean Energy Connection
On July 1, 2020, Duke Energy Florida petitioned the FPSC for approval of a voluntary solar program. The program consists of 10 new solar generating facilities with combined capacity of approximately 750 MW. The program allows participants to support cost-effective solar development in Florida by paying a subscription fee based on per kilowatt subscriptions and receiving a credit on their bill based on the actual generation associated with their portion of the solar portfolio. The estimated cost of the 10 new solar generation facilities is approximately $1 billion and the projects are expected to be completed by the end of 2024. This investment will be included in base rates offset by the revenue from the subscription fees and the credits will be included for recovery in the fuel cost recovery clause. The FPSC approved the program in January 2021.
On February 24, 2021, the League of United Latin American Citizens (LULAC) filed a notice of appeal of the FPSC’s order approving the Clean Energy Connection to the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida heard the oral argument on February 9, 2022. On May 27, 2022, the Supreme Court of Florida issued an order remanding the case back to the FPSC so that the FPSC can amend its order to better address some of the arguments raised by LULAC. On September 23, 2022, the FPSC issued a revised order and submitted it on September 26, 2022, to the Supreme Court of Florida. The Supreme Court of Florida requested that the parties file supplemental briefs regarding the revised order, which were filed February 6, 2023. The FPSC approval order remains in effect pending the outcome of the appeal. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Storm Protection Plan
On April 11, 2022, Duke Energy Florida filed a Storm Protection Plan for approval with the FPSC. The plan, which covers investments for the 2023-2032 time frame, reflects approximately $7 billion of capital investment in transmission and distribution meant to strengthen its infrastructure, reduce outage times associated with extreme weather events, reduce restoration costs and improve overall service reliability. The evidentiary hearing began on August 2, 2022. On October 4, 2022, the FPSC voted to approve Duke Energy Florida's plan with one modification to remove the transmission loop radially fed program, representing a reduction of approximately $80 million over the 10-year period starting in 2025. On December 9, 2022, the Office of Public Counsel filed a notice of appeal of this order to the Florida Supreme Court. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Hurricane Ian
On September 28, 2022, much of Duke Energy Florida’s service territory was impacted by Hurricane Ian, which caused significant damage resulting in more than 1.1 million outages. Duke Energy Florida's December 31, 2022 Consolidated Balance Sheets include an estimate of approximately $353 million related to deferred Hurricane Ian storm costs, consistent with the FPSC's storm rule, in Regulatory assets within Other Noncurrent Assets. After depleting any existing storm reserves, which were approximately $107 million before Hurricane Ian, Duke Energy Florida is permitted to petition the FPSC for recovery of additional incremental operation and maintenance costs resulting from the storm and to replenish the retail customer storm reserve to approximately $132 million. Duke Energy Florida filed its petition for cost recovery of various storms, including Hurricane Ian, and replenishment of the storm reserve on January 23, 2023, seeking recovery of $442 million, for recovery over 12 months beginning with the first billing cycle in April 2023. Duke Energy Florida cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
144

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Ohio
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Ohio's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$ $33 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power54 38 2023
Accrued pension and OPEB129 133 (e)
Storm cost deferrals
14 2023
Hedge costs deferrals
2 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
15 16 Yes2083
AMI18 24 (b)
Customer connect project54 41 (b)
CEP deferral190 161 Yes(b)
Deferred pipeline integrity costs28 24 Yes(b)
Propane caverns26 — (b)
Manufactured gas plant (MGP) 104 (b)
Other154 126 (b)
Total regulatory assets684 707 
Less: current portion103 72 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$581 $635 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$496 $602 (b)
Costs of removal9 39 (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB21 21 (e)
Provision for rate refunds— 61 
Other107 78 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities633 801 
Less: current portion99 62 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$534 $739 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
Duke Energy Ohio Electric Base Rate Case
Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO an electric distribution base rate case application on October 1, 2021, with supporting testimony filed on October 15, 2021, requesting an increase in electric distribution base rates of approximately $55 million and an ROE of 10.3%. This is an approximate 3.3% average increase in the customer's total bill across all customer classes. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Ohio's last electric distribution base rate case in 2017. Duke Energy Ohio is also seeking to adjust the caps on its Distribution Capital Investment Rider (DCI Rider). The Staff of the PUCO (Staff) report was issued on May 19, 2022, recommending an increase in electric distribution base rates of $2 million to $15 million with an ROE range of 8.84% to 9.85%. On September 19, 2022, Duke Energy Ohio filed a Stipulation and Recommendation with the PUCO, which includes an increase in overall electric distribution base rates of approximately $23 million and an ROE of 9.5%. The stipulation is among all but one party to the proceeding. The PUCO issued an order on December 14, 2022, approving the Stipulation without material modification. Rates went into effect on January 3, 2023. The Ohio Consumers' Counsel (OCC) filed an application for rehearing on January 13, 2023. On February 8, 2023, the Commission granted the OCC's application for rehearing for further consideration.Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
145

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Energy Efficiency Cost Recovery
In response to changes in Ohio law that eliminated Ohio's energy efficiency mandates, the PUCO issued an order on February 26, 2020, directing utilities to wind down their demand-side management programs by September 30, 2020, and to terminate the programs by December 31, 2020. Duke Energy Ohio took the following actions:
On March 27, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application for rehearing seeking clarification on the final true up and reconciliation process after 2020. On November 18, 2020, the PUCO issued an order replacing the cost cap previously imposed upon Duke Energy Ohio with a cap on shared savings recovery. On December 18, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an additional application for rehearing challenging, among other things, the imposition of the cap on shared savings. On January 13, 2021, the application for rehearing was granted for further consideration.
On October 9, 2020, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to implement a voluntary energy efficiency program portfolio to commence on January 1, 2021. The application proposed a mechanism for recovery of program costs and a benefit associated with avoided transmission and distribution costs. This application remains under review.
On November 18, 2020, the PUCO issued an order directing all utilities to set their energy efficiency riders to zero effective January 1, 2021, and to file a separate application for final reconciliation of all energy efficiency costs prior to December 31, 2020. Effective January 1, 2021, Duke Energy Ohio suspended its energy efficiency programs.
On June 14, 2021, the PUCO requested each utility to file by July 15, 2021, a proposal to reestablish low-income programs through December 31, 2021. Duke Energy Ohio filed its application on July 14, 2021.
On February 23, 2022, the PUCO issued its Fifth Entry on Rehearing that 1) affirmed its reduction in Duke Energy Ohio's shared savings cap; 2) denied rehearing/clarification regarding lost distribution revenues and shared savings recovery for periods after December 31, 2020; and 3) directed Duke Energy Ohio to submit an updated application with exhibits.
On March 25, 2022, Duke Energy Ohio filed its Amended Application consistent with the PUCO's order.
Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Duke Energy Ohio Natural Gas Base Rate Case
Duke Energy Ohio filed with the PUCO a natural gas base rate case application on June 30, 2022, with supporting testimony filed on July 14, 2022, requesting an increase in natural gas base rates of approximately $49 million and an ROE of 10.3%. This is an approximate 5.6% average increase in the customer's total bill across all customer classes. The drivers for this case are capital invested since Duke Energy Ohio's last natural gas base rate case in 2012. Duke Energy Ohio is also seeking to adjust the caps on its Capital Expenditure Program Rider (CEP Rider). The Staff of the PUCO (Staff) report was issued on December 21, 2022, recommending an increase in natural gas base rates of $24 million to $36 million, with an equity ratio of 52% and an ROE range of 9.03% to 10.04%. A procedural schedule was issued on December 22, 2022, scheduling the evidentiary hearing to commence on March 28, 2023. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Natural Gas Pipeline Extension
Duke Energy Ohio installed a new natural gas pipeline (the Central Corridor Project) in its Ohio service territory to increase system reliability and enable the retirement of older infrastructure. Construction of the pipeline extension was completed and placed in service on March 14, 2022, with a total cost of approximately $170 million (excluding overheads and AFUDC).
MGP Cost Recovery
In an order issued in 2013, the PUCO approved Duke Energy Ohio's deferral and recovery of costs related to environmental remediation at two sites (East End and West End) that housed former MGP operations. Duke Energy Ohio made annual applications with the PUCO to recover its incremental remediation costs consistent with the PUCO’s directive in Duke Energy Ohio’s 2012 natural gas base rate case.
A Stipulation and Recommendation was filed jointly by Duke Energy Ohio, the Staff, the Office of the Ohio Consumers' Counsel and the Ohio Energy Group on August 31, 2021, which was approved without modification by the PUCO on April 20, 2022. The Stipulation and Recommendation resolved all open issues regarding MGP remediation costs incurred between 2013 and 2019, Duke Energy Ohio’s request for additional deferral authority beyond 2019 and the pending issues related to the Tax Act described below as it related to Duke Energy Ohio’s natural gas operations. As a result of the approval of the Stipulation and Recommendation, Duke Energy Ohio recognized pretax charges of approximately $15 million to Operating revenues, regulated natural gas and $58 million to Operation, maintenance and other and a tax benefit of $72 million to Income Tax (Benefit) Expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. The Stipulation and Recommendation further acknowledged Duke Energy Ohio’s ability to file a request for additional deferral authority in the future related to environmental remediation of any MGP impacts in the Ohio River, if necessary, subject to specific conditions. On June 15, 2022, the PUCO granted the rehearing requests of Interstate Gas Supply, Inc. (IGS) and The Retail Energy Supply Association (RESA), which were filed on May 20, 2022, for further consideration. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
146

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Tax Act – Ohio
On December 21, 2018, Duke Energy Ohio filed an application to change its base rate tariffs and establish a new rider to implement the benefits of the Tax Act for natural gas customers. The new rider would flow through to customers the benefit of the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, all future benefits of the lower tax rates and a full refund of deferred income taxes collected at the higher tax rates in prior years. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules would be refunded consistent with federal law and deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules will be refunded over a 10-year period. An evidentiary hearing occurred on August 7, 2019. The Stipulation and Recommendation filed on August 31, 2021, and approved on April 20, 2022, disclosed in the MGP Cost Recovery matter above, resolves the outstanding issues in this proceeding by providing customers a one-time bill credit for the reduction in the statutory federal tax rate from 35% to 21% since January 1, 2018, through June 1, 2022, and reducing base rates going forward. Deferred income taxes subject to normalization rules will be refunded consistent with federal law through a new rider. Deferred income taxes not subject to normalization rules were written off. The commission granted the rehearing requests of IGS and RESA for further consideration. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Midwest Propane Caverns
Duke Energy Ohio used propane stored in caverns to meet peak demand during winter for several decades. Once the Central Corridor Project was complete and placed in service, the propane peaking facilities were no longer necessary and were retired. On October 7, 2021, Duke Energy Ohio requested deferral treatment of the property, plant and equipment as well as costs related to propane inventory and decommissioning costs. On January 6, 2022, the Staff issued a report recommending deferral authority for costs related to propane inventory and decommissioning costs, but not for the net book value of the remaining plant assets. As a result of the Staff's report, Duke Energy Ohio recorded a $19 million charge to Impairment of assets and other charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2021. A Stipulation and Recommendation was filed jointly by Duke Energy Ohio and the Staff on April 27, 2022, recommending, among other things, approval of deferral treatment of a portion of the net book value of the property, plant and equipment prior to the 2021 impairment at the time of the next natural gas base rate case, excluding operations and maintenance savings, decommissioning costs not to exceed $7 million and costs related to propane inventory. The Stipulation and Recommendation states that Duke Energy Ohio will seek recovery of the deferral through its next natural gas base rate case proceeding with a proposed amortization period of at least 10 years and include an independent engineering study analyzing the necessity and prudency of the incremental investments made at the facilities since March 31, 2012. Duke Energy Ohio will not seek a return on the deferred amounts. An evidentiary hearing was held on September 8, 2022. On October 5, 2022, the PUCO issued an order approving the Stipulation and Recommendation as filed. As a result of the order, Duke Energy Ohio recorded a reversal of $12 million to Impairment of assets and other charges on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the year ended December 31, 2022.
Duke Energy Kentucky Electric Base Rate Case
On December 1, 2022, Duke Energy Kentucky filed a rate case with the KPSC requesting an annualized increase in electric base rates of approximately $75 million and an ROE of 10.35%. This is an overall increase in rates of approximately 17.8%. The request for rate increase is driven by capital investments to strengthen the electricity generation and delivery systems along with adjusted depreciation rates for the East Bend and Woodsdale generation stations to support the energy transition. Duke Energy Kentucky is also requesting new programs and tariff updates, including a voluntary community-based renewable subscription program and two EV charging programs. A procedural schedule was issued on December 19, 2022, scheduling the evidentiary hearing for May 9, 2023. New rates are anticipated to go into effect around July 15, 2023. Duke Energy Kentucky cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
147

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Duke Energy Indiana
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Duke Energy Indiana's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – coal ash$385 $749 Yes(b)
Deferred fuel and purchased power138 158 2023
Accrued pension and OPEB214 222 (e)
Hedge costs deferrals
20 35 (b)
PISCC and deferred operating expenses(c)
255 262 Yes(b)
Retired generation facilities(c)
34 38 Yes2030
AMI15 17 2031
Customer connect project19 11 (b)
Other44 63 (b)
Total regulatory assets1,124 1,555 
Less: current portion249 277 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$875 $1,278 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$840 $908 (b)
Costs of removal531 575 (d)
Hedge cost deferrals81 — (b)
Accrued pension and OPEB104 113 (e)
Other85 96 (b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,641 1,692 
Less: current portion187 127 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,454 $1,565 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Refunded over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
2019 Indiana Rate Case
On July 2, 2019, Duke Energy Indiana filed a general rate case with the IURC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $395 million. The rebuttal case, filed on December 4, 2019, updated the requested revenue requirement to result in a 15.6% or $396 million average retail rate increase, including the impacts of the utility receipts tax. On June 29, 2020, the IURC issued an order in the rate case approving a revenue increase of $146 million before certain adjustments and ratemaking refinements. The order approved Duke Energy Indiana's requested forecasted rate base of $10.2 billion as of December 31, 2020, including the Edwardsport Integrated Gasification Combined Cycle (IGCC) Plant. The IURC reduced Duke Energy Indiana's request by slightly more than $200 million, when accounting for the utility receipts tax and other adjustments. Approximately 50% of the reduction was due to a prospective change in depreciation and use of regulatory asset for the end-of-life inventory at retired generating plants, approximately 20% was due to the approved ROE of 9.7% versus the requested ROE of 10.4% and approximately 20% was related to miscellaneous earnings neutral adjustments. Step one rates were estimated to be approximately 75% of the total and became effective on July 30, 2020. Step two rates estimated to be the remaining 25% of the total rate increase were approved on July 28, 2021, and implemented in August 2021.
Several groups appealed the IURC order to the Indiana Court of Appeals. The Indiana Court of Appeals affirmed the IURC decision on May 13, 2021. However, upon appeal by the Indiana Office of Utility Consumer Counselor (OUCC) and the Duke Industrial Group on March 10, 2022, the Indiana Supreme Court found that the IURC erred in allowing Duke Energy Indiana to recover coal ash costs incurred before the IURC’s rate case order in June 2020. The Indiana Supreme Court found that allowing Duke Energy Indiana to recover coal ash costs incurred between rate cases that exceeded the amount built into base rates violated the prohibition against retroactive ratemaking. The IURC’s order has been remanded to the IURC for additional proceedings consistent with the Indiana Supreme Court’s opinion. As a result of the court's opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized pretax charges of approximately $211 million to Impairment of assets and other charges and $46 million to Operating revenues in the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana filed a request for rehearing with the Supreme Court on April 11, 2022, which the court denied on May 26, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana filed its testimony in the remand proceeding on August 18, 2022. An evidentiary hearing is scheduled to begin March 3, 2023. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
148

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
2020 Indiana Coal Ash Recovery Case
In Duke Energy Indiana’s 2019 rate case, the IURC also opened a subdocket for post-2018 coal ash related expenditures. Duke Energy Indiana filed testimony on April 15, 2020, in the coal ash subdocket requesting recovery for the post-2018 coal ash basin closure costs for plans that have been approved by the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) as well as continuing deferral, with carrying costs, on the balance. An evidentiary hearing was held on September 14, 2020. Briefing was completed by mid-September 2021. On November 3, 2021, the IURC issued an order allowing recovery for post-2018 coal ash basin closure costs for the plans that have been approved by IDEM, as well as continuing deferral, with carrying costs, on the balance. The OUCC and the Duke Industrial Group appealed. The Indiana Court of Appeals issued its opinion on February 21, 2023, reversing the IURC's order to the extent that it allowed Duke Energy Indiana to recover federally mandated costs incurred prior to the IURC's November 3, 2021 order. In addition, the court found that any costs incurred pre-petition to determine federally mandated compliance options were not specifically authorized by the statute and should also be disallowed. Duke Energy Indiana is assessing its appellate options and must file a petition to transfer to the Indiana Supreme Court by April 7, 2023. As a result of the court's opinion, Duke Energy Indiana recognized a pretax charge of approximately $175 million to Impairment of assets and other charges for the year ended December 31, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
TDSIC 2.0
On November 23, 2021, Duke Energy Indiana filed for approval of the Transmission, Distribution, Storage Improvement Charge 2.0 investment plan for 2023-2028 (TDSIC 2.0). On June 15, 2022, the IURC approved, without modification, TDSIC 2.0, which includes approximately $2 billion in transmission and distribution investments selected to improve customer reliability, harden and improve resiliency of the grid, enable expansion of renewable and distributed energy projects and encourage economic development. In addition, the IURC set up a subdocket to consider the targeted economic development project, which the IURC approved on March 2, 2022. On July 15, 2022, the OUCC filed a notice of appeal to the Indiana Court of Appeals in Duke Energy Indiana’s TDSIC 2.0 proceeding. An appellant brief was filed on October 28, 2022, and Duke Energy Indiana filed its responsive brief on December 28, 2022. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Piedmont
Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
The following tables present the regulatory assets and liabilities recorded on Piedmont's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,Earns/PaysRecovery/Refund
(in millions)20222021a ReturnPeriod Ends
Regulatory Assets(a)
AROs – nuclear and other$27 $22 (d)
Accrued pension and OPEB(c)
119 82 (g)
Vacation accrual12 12 2023
Derivatives – natural gas supply contracts(f)
168 139 
Deferred pipeline integrity costs(c)
93 84 2025
Amounts due from customers57 85 (e)(b)
Other35 33 (b)
Total regulatory assets511 457 
Less: current portion119 141 
Total noncurrent regulatory assets$392 $316 
Regulatory Liabilities(a)
Net regulatory liability related to income taxes$459 $510 (b)
Costs of removal(c)
573 572 (d)
Other66 32 (e)(b)
Total regulatory liabilities1,098 1,114 
Less: current portion74 56 
Total noncurrent regulatory liabilities$1,024 $1,058 
(a)    Regulatory assets and liabilities are excluded from rate base unless otherwise noted.
(b)    The expected recovery or refund period varies or has not been determined.
(c)    Included in rate base.
(d)    Recovery over the life of the associated assets.
(e)    Certain costs earn/pay a return.
(f)    Balance will fluctuate with changes in the market. Current contracts extend into 2031.
(g)    Recovered primarily over the average remaining service periods or life expectancies of employees covered by the benefit plans. See Note 23 for additional detail.
2022 South Carolina Rate Case
On April 1, 2022, Piedmont filed an application with the PSCSC for a rate increase for retail customers of approximately $7 million, which represents an approximate 3.4% increase in retail revenues. An evidentiary hearing was held on August 15, 2022. On September 15, 2022, the PSCSC delivered its decision, which included an ROE of 9.3% and a capital structure of 52.2% equity and 47.8% debt and issued its final order on October 6, 2022. Revised customer rates became effective in October 2022 and resulted in a rate decrease for retail customers of approximately $1 million.
149

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
Tennessee Annual Review Mechanism
On October 10, 2022, the TPUC approved Piedmont’s petition to adopt an Annual Review Mechanism (ARM) as allowed by Tennessee law. Under the ARM, Piedmont will adjust rates annually to achieve its allowed 9.80% ROE over the upcoming year and to true up any variance between its allowed ROE and actual ROE from the prior calendar year. The initial year subject to the true up is 2022, and the initial rate adjustments request will be filed in May 2023 for rates effective October 1, 2023.
OTHER REGULATORY MATTERS
Atlantic Coast Pipeline, LLC
Atlantic Coast Pipeline (ACP pipeline) was planned to be an approximately 600-mile interstate natural gas pipeline running from West Virginia to North Carolina. Duke Energy indirectly owns a 47% interest, which is accounted for as an equity method investment through its Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment.
As a result of the uncertainty created by various legal rulings, the potential impact on the cost and schedule for the project, the ongoing legal challenges and the risk of additional legal challenges and delays through the construction period and Dominion’s decision to sell substantially all of its gas transmission and storage segment assets, Duke Energy's Board of Directors and management decided that it was not prudent to continue to invest in the project. On July 5, 2020, Duke Energy and Dominion announced the cancellation of the ACP pipeline project.
As part of the pretax charges to earnings of approximately $2.1 billion recorded for the year ended December 31, 2020, within Equity in earnings (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates on the Duke Energy Consolidated Statements of Operations, Duke Energy established liabilities related to the cancellation of the ACP pipeline project. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. At December 31, 2022, there is $59 million and $47 million within Other Current Liabilities and Other Noncurrent Liabilities, respectively, in the Gas Utilities and Infrastructure segment. The liabilities represent Duke Energy's obligation of approximately $106 million to satisfy remaining ARO requirements to restore construction sites.
See Notes 8 and 13 for additional information regarding this transaction.
Potential Coal Plant Retirements
The Subsidiary Registrants periodically file IRPs with their state regulatory commissions. The IRPs provide a view of forecasted energy needs over a long term (10 to 20 years) and options being considered to meet those needs. IRPs filed by the Subsidiary Registrants included planning assumptions to potentially retire certain coal-fired generating facilities in North Carolina and Indiana earlier than their current estimated useful lives. The NCUC concluded in its Carbon Plan order that the projected retirements dates presented by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress in their Carbon Plan for coal-fired generating facilities were reasonable for planning purposes and further directed that appropriate steps be taken to optimally retire the coal fleet according to such schedule. Duke Energy continues to evaluate the potential need to retire these coal-fired generating facilities earlier than the current estimated useful lives and plans to seek regulatory recovery for amounts that would not be otherwise recovered when any of these assets are retired.
The table below contains the net carrying value of generating facilities planned for retirement or included in recent IRPs or Carbon Plan as evaluated for potential retirement. Dollar amounts in the table below are included in Net property, plant and equipment on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022, and exclude capitalized asset retirement costs.
Remaining Net
CapacityBook Value
(in MW)(in millions)
Duke Energy Carolinas
Allen Steam Station Unit 1(a)
167 $10 
Allen Steam Station Unit 5(b)
259 233 
Cliffside Unit 5(b)
546 344 
Marshall Units 1-2(b)
760428
Duke Energy Progress
Mayo Unit 1(b)
713 639 
Roxboro Units 3-4(b)
1,409 425 
Duke Energy Florida
Crystal River Units 4-5(c)
1,442 1,549 
Duke Energy Indiana
Gibson Units 1-5(d)
2,845 2,043 
Cayuga Units 1-2(d)
1,005 622 
Total Duke Energy9,146 $6,293 
(a)    As part of the 2015 resolution of a lawsuit involving alleged New Source Review violations, Duke Energy Carolinas must retire Allen Steam Station Unit 1 by December 31, 2024.
(b)    These units were included in the IRP filed by Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress in South Carolina on September 1, 2020, and in the Carbon Plan adopted by the NCUC in December 2022. The long-term energy options considered could result in retirement of these units earlier than their current estimated useful lives.
150

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREGULATORY MATTERS
(c)    On January 14, 2021, Duke Energy Florida filed the 2021 Settlement agreement with the FPSC, which proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates for Duke Energy Florida's last two coal-fired generating facilities, Crystal River Units 4-5, eight years ahead of schedule in 2034 rather than in 2042. The FPSC approved the 2021 Settlement on May 4, 2021. The remaining net book value reflected in the table above excludes $200 million of accelerated deprecation collected from retail customers pursuant to Duke Energy Florida's 2017 Settlement.
(d)    The rate case filed July 2, 2019, included proposed depreciation rates reflecting retirement dates from 2026 to 2038. The depreciation rates reflecting these updated retirement dates were approved by the IURC as part of the rate case order issued on June 29, 2020.
5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
INSURANCE
General Insurance
The Duke Energy Registrants have insurance and reinsurance coverage either directly or through indemnification from Duke Energy’s captive insurance company, Bison, and its affiliates, consistent with companies engaged in similar commercial operations with similar type properties. The Duke Energy Registrants’ coverage includes (i) commercial general liability coverage for liabilities arising to third parties for bodily injury and property damage; (ii) workers’ compensation; (iii) automobile liability coverage; and (iv) property coverage for all real and personal property damage. Real and personal property damage coverage excludes electric transmission and distribution lines, but includes damages arising from boiler and machinery breakdowns, earthquakes, flood damage and extra expense, but not outage or replacement power coverage. All coverage is subject to certain deductibles or retentions, sublimits, exclusions, terms and conditions common for companies with similar types of operations. The Duke Energy Registrants self-insure their electric transmission and distribution lines against loss due to storm damage and other natural disasters. As discussed further in Note 4, Duke Energy Florida maintains a storm damage reserve and has a regulatory mechanism to recover the cost of named storms on an expedited basis.
The cost of the Duke Energy Registrants’ coverage can fluctuate from year to year reflecting claims history and conditions of the insurance and reinsurance markets.
In the event of a loss, terms and amounts of insurance and reinsurance available might not be adequate to cover claims and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered by other sources, could have a material effect on the Duke Energy Registrants’ results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Each company is responsible to the extent losses may be excluded or exceed limits of the coverage available.
Nuclear Insurance
Duke Energy Carolinas owns and operates McGuire and Oconee and operates and has a partial ownership interest in Catawba. McGuire and Catawba each have two reactors. Oconee has three reactors. The other joint owners of Catawba reimburse Duke Energy Carolinas for certain expenses associated with nuclear insurance per the Catawba joint owner agreements.
Duke Energy Progress owns and operates Robinson, Brunswick and Harris. Robinson and Harris each have one reactor. Brunswick has two reactors.
Duke Energy Florida owns Crystal River Unit 3, which permanently ceased operation in 2013 and achieved a SAFSTOR condition in July 2019. On October 1, 2020, Crystal River Unit 3 changed decommissioning strategies from SAFSTOR to DECON.
In the event of a loss, terms and amounts of insurance available might not be adequate to cover property damage and other expenses incurred. Uninsured losses and other expenses, to the extent not recovered by other sources, could have a material effect on Duke Energy Carolinas’, Duke Energy Progress’ and Duke Energy Florida’s results of operations, cash flows or financial position. Each company is responsible to the extent losses may be excluded or exceed limits of the coverage available.
Nuclear Liability Coverage
The Price-Anderson Act requires owners of nuclear reactors to provide for public nuclear liability protection per nuclear incident up to a maximum total financial protection liability. The maximum total financial protection liability, which is approximately $13.7 billion, is subject to change every five years for inflation and for the number of licensed reactors. Total nuclear liability coverage consists of a combination of private primary nuclear liability insurance coverage and a mandatory industry risk-sharing program to provide for excess nuclear liability coverage above the maximum reasonably available private primary coverage. The U.S. Congress could impose revenue-raising measures on the nuclear industry to pay claims.
Primary Liability Insurance
Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have purchased the maximum reasonably available private primary nuclear liability insurance as required by law, which is $450 million per station. Duke Energy Florida has purchased $100 million primary nuclear liability insurance for Crystal River in compliance with the law.
Excess Liability Program
This program provides $13.2 billion of coverage per incident through the Price-Anderson Act’s mandatory industrywide excess secondary financial protection program of risk pooling. This amount is the product of potential cumulative retrospective premium assessments of $138 million times the current 96 licensed commercial nuclear reactors in the U.S. Under this program, operating unit licensees could be assessed retrospective premiums to compensate for public nuclear liability damages in the event of a nuclear incident at any licensed facility in the U.S. Retrospective premiums may be assessed at a rate not to exceed $20.5 million per year per licensed reactor for each incident. The assessment may be subject to state premium taxes.
151

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Nuclear Property and Accidental Outage Coverage
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are members of Nuclear Electric Insurance Limited (NEIL), an industry mutual insurance company, which provides property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning insurance for each station for losses resulting from damage to its nuclear plants, either due to accidents or acts of terrorism. Additionally, NEIL provides accidental outage coverage for losses in the event of a major accidental outage at an insured nuclear station.
Pursuant to regulations of the NRC, each company’s property damage insurance policies provide that all proceeds from such insurance be applied, first, to place the plant in a safe and stable condition after a qualifying accident and second, to decontaminate the plant before any proceeds can be used for decommissioning, plant repair or restoration.
Losses resulting from acts of terrorism are covered as common occurrences, such that if terrorist acts occur against one or more commercial nuclear power plants insured by NEIL within a 12-month period, they would be treated as one event and the owners of the plants where the act occurred would share one full limit of liability. The full limit of liability is currently $3.2 billion. NEIL sublimits the total aggregate for all of their policies for non-nuclear terrorist events to approximately $1.8 billion.
Each nuclear facility has accident property damage, nuclear accident decontamination and premature decommissioning liability insurance from NEIL with limits of $1.5 billion, except for Crystal River Unit 3. Crystal River Unit 3’s limit is $50 million and is on an actual cash value basis. All nuclear facilities except for Catawba and Crystal River Unit 3 also share an additional $1.25 billion nuclear accident insurance limit above their dedicated underlying limit. This shared additional excess limit is not subject to reinstatement in the event of a loss. Catawba has a dedicated $1.25 billion of additional nuclear accident insurance limit above its dedicated underlying limit. Catawba and Oconee also have an additional $750 million of non-nuclear accident property damage limit. All coverages are subject to sublimits and significant deductibles.
NEIL’s Accidental Outage policy provides some coverage, similar to business interruption, for losses in the event of a major accident property damage outage of a nuclear unit. Coverage is provided on a weekly limit basis after a significant waiting period deductible and at 100% of the applicable weekly limits for 52 weeks and 80% of the applicable weekly limits for up to the next 110 weeks. Coverage is provided until these applicable weekly periods are met, where the accidental outage policy limit will not exceed $490 million for Catawba, McGuire, Harris, Brunswick, Oconee and Robinson. NEIL sublimits the accidental outage recovery up to the first 104 weeks of coverage not to exceed $328 million from non-nuclear accidental property damage. Coverage amounts decrease in the event more than one unit at a station is out of service due to a common accident. All coverages are subject to sublimits and significant deductibles.
Potential Retroactive Premium Assessments
In the event of NEIL losses, NEIL’s board of directors may assess member companies' retroactive premiums of amounts up to 10 times their annual premiums for up to six years after a loss. NEIL has never exercised this assessment. The maximum aggregate annual retrospective premium obligations for Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are $151 million, $93 million and $1 million, respectively. Duke Energy Carolinas' maximum assessment amount includes 100% of potential obligations to NEIL for jointly owned reactors. Duke Energy Carolinas would seek reimbursement from the joint owners for their portion of these assessment amounts.
ENVIRONMENTAL
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to federal, state and local regulations regarding air and water quality, hazardous and solid waste disposal, coal ash and other environmental matters. These regulations can be changed from time to time, imposing new obligations on the Duke Energy Registrants. The following environmental matters impact all of the Duke Energy Registrants.
Remediation Activities
In addition to AROs recorded as a result of various environmental regulations, discussed in Note 10, the Duke Energy Registrants are responsible for environmental remediation at various sites. These include certain properties that are part of ongoing operations and sites formerly owned or used by Duke Energy entities. These sites are in various stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring. Managed in conjunction with relevant federal, state and local agencies, remediation activities vary based upon site conditions and location, remediation requirements, complexity and sharing of responsibility. If remediation activities involve joint and several liability provisions, strict liability, or cost recovery or contribution actions, the Duke Energy Registrants could potentially be held responsible for environmental impacts caused by other potentially responsible parties and may also benefit from insurance policies or contractual indemnities that cover some or all cleanup costs. Liabilities are recorded when losses become probable and are reasonably estimable. The total costs that may be incurred cannot be estimated because the extent of environmental impact, allocation among potentially responsible parties, remediation alternatives and/or regulatory decisions have not yet been determined at all sites. Additional costs associated with remediation activities are likely to be incurred in the future and could be significant. Costs are typically expensed as Operation, maintenance and other in the Consolidated Statements of Operations unless regulatory recovery of the costs is deemed probable.
152

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The following table contains information regarding reserves for probable and estimable costs related to the various environmental sites. These reserves are recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(in millions)December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Reserves for Environmental Remediation
Duke Energy$84 $88 
Duke Energy Carolinas22 19 
Progress Energy19 23 
Duke Energy Progress8 11 
Duke Energy Florida11 11 
Duke Energy Ohio33 34 
Duke Energy Indiana3 
Piedmont7 
Additional losses in excess of recorded reserves that could be incurred for the stages of investigation, remediation and monitoring for environmental sites that have been evaluated at this time are not material.
LITIGATION
Duke Energy
Michael Johnson et al. v. Duke Energy Corporation et al.
On September 23, 2020, plaintiff Michael Johnson, a former Duke Energy employee and participant in the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan (Plan) brought suit on his own behalf and on behalf of other participants and beneficiaries similarly situated against Duke Energy Corporation, the Duke Energy Benefits Committee, and other unnamed individual defendants. The complaint, which was subsequently amended to add a current participant as a plaintiff on November 23, 2020, alleges that the defendants breached their fiduciary duties with respect to certain fees associated with the Plan in violation of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and seeks certification of a class of all individuals who were participants or beneficiaries of the Plan at any time on or after September 23, 2014. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss the plaintiffs’ amended complaint on December 18, 2020. On January 31, 2022, the court denied the defendants' motion to dismiss. On February 28, 2022, Duke Energy responded to the amended complaint. Discovery commenced and the parties exchanged preliminary disclosures. After review of these disclosures, the plaintiffs agreed to voluntarily dismiss the suit and the parties subsequently filed a joint stipulation of voluntary dismissal with prejudice on April 29, 2022, ending this litigation.
Texas Storm Uri Tort Litigation
Duke Energy Corporation and several Duke Energy renewables project companies in the ERCOT market were named in more than thirty lawsuits arising out of Texas Storm Uri, which occurred in February 2021. Duke Energy Corporation was dismissed from the suits, leaving two suits in which individual wind and solar projects are named. These lawsuits seek recovery for property damages, personal injury and wrongful death allegedly caused by the power outages that plaintiffs claim were the collective failure of generators, transmission and distribution utilities ("TDUs"), retail energy providers, natural gas providers, co-ops and municipalities that generate power and ERCOT, all of which were originally sued by all plaintiffs. The cases were consolidated into a Texas state court multidistrict litigation (MDL) proceeding for discovery and pre-trial motions. Five cases were designated for motions to dismiss and all other cases were stayed. On January 28, 2023, the Court denied the generators' and TDUs' motions to dismiss the negligence claims but dismissed the tortious interference and conspiracy claims. The motions to dismiss ERCOT and the natural gas defendants were also granted. The generator and TDU defendants filed a petition for mandamus in each of the five cases seeking to overturn the denials on February 10, 2023. If the Texas Court of Appeals accepts the appeals, it will set a briefing schedule. The remaining cases that are part of the MDL are currently stayed, except that plaintiffs have been given leave to amend their pleadings. Plaintiffs began amending existing lawsuits and filing new lawsuits on behalf of hundreds of plaintiffs against hundreds of defendants, including in some cases, by again naming Duke Energy Corporation and naming, for the first time, Duke Energy Renewables, LLC. Plaintiffs have also re-named ERCOT as a defendant. As new cases are served, they are being brought into the MDL and are subject to the stay in the MDL proceeding. Duke Energy cannot predict the outcomes of these matters. See Note 2 for more information related to the sale of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
Duke Energy Carolinas
Ruben Villano, et al. v. Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
On June 16, 2021, a group of nine individuals went over a low head dam adjacent to the Dan River Steam Station in Eden, North Carolina, while water tubing. Emergency personnel rescued four people and five others were confirmed deceased. On August 11, 2021, Duke Energy Carolinas was served with the complaint filed in Durham County Superior Court on behalf of four survivors, which was later amended to include all the decedents along with the survivors. The lawsuit alleges that Duke Energy Carolinas knew that the river was used for recreational purposes and that Duke Energy did not adequately warn about the dam and that Duke Energy Carolinas created a dangerous and hidden hazard on the Dan River in building and maintaining the low head dam. Discovery has commenced and is scheduled to be completed on or before August 23, 2023. The parties are preparing for mediation, which is scheduled for March 22, 2023. Dispositive motions are due to be filed by September 6, 2023, and the case is scheduled to be trial-ready by October 2, 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
153

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
NTE Carolinas II, LLC Litigation
In November 2017, Duke Energy Carolinas entered into a standard FERC large generator interconnection agreement (LGIA) with NTE Carolinas II, LLC (NTE), a company that proposed to build a combined-cycle natural gas plant in Rockingham County, North Carolina. On September 6, 2019, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a lawsuit in Mecklenburg County Superior Court against NTE for breach of contract, alleging that NTE's failure to pay benchmark payments for Duke Energy Carolinas' transmission system upgrades required under the interconnection agreement constituted a termination of the interconnection agreement. Duke Energy Carolinas sought a monetary judgment against NTE because NTE failed to make multiple milestone payments. The lawsuit was moved to federal court in North Carolina. NTE filed a motion to dismiss Duke Energy Carolinas’ complaint and brought counterclaims alleging anti-competitive conduct and violations of state and federal statutes. Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion to dismiss NTE's counterclaims. Both NTE's and Duke Energy Carolinas' motions to dismiss were subsequently denied by the court.
On May 21, 2020, in response to an NTE petition challenging Duke Energy Carolinas' termination of the LGIA, FERC issued a ruling that 1) it has exclusive jurisdiction to determine whether a transmission provider may terminate a LGIA; 2) FERC approval is required to terminate a conforming LGIA if objected to by the interconnection customer; and 3) Duke Energy may not announce the termination of a conforming LGIA unless FERC has approved the termination. FERC's Office of Enforcement also initiated an investigation of Duke Energy Carolinas into matters pertaining to the LGIA. Duke Energy Carolinas is cooperating with the Office of Enforcement but cannot predict the outcome of this investigation.
Following completion of discovery, Duke Energy Carolinas filed a motion for summary judgment seeking a ruling in its favor as to some of its affirmative claims against NTE and to all of NTE’s counterclaims. On June 24, 2022, the court issued an order partially granting Duke Energy Carolinas' motion by dismissing NTE's counterclaims that Duke Energy Carolinas engaged in anti-competitive behavior in violation of state and federal statutes. On October 12, 2022, the parties executed a settlement agreement with respect to the remaining breach of contract claims in the litigation and a Stipulation of Dismissal was filed with the court on October 13, 2022. On November 11, 2022, NTE filed its Notice of Appeal to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit as to the District Court's summary judgment ruling in Duke Energy Carolinas' favor on NTE's antitrust and unfair competition claims. Briefing on NTE's appeal will be completed on May 3, 2023. Duke Energy Carolinas cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Asbestos-related Injuries and Damages Claims
Duke Energy Carolinas has experienced numerous claims for indemnification and medical cost reimbursement related to asbestos exposure. These claims relate to damages for bodily injuries alleged to have arisen from exposure to or use of asbestos in connection with construction and maintenance activities conducted on its electric generation plants prior to 1985.
Duke Energy Carolinas has recognized asbestos-related reserves of $457 million and $501 million at December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These reserves are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The change in the reserves is a result of a third-party study completed in 2021 as well as settlements made throughout the year. These reserves are based upon Duke Energy Carolinas' best estimate for current and future asbestos claims through 2042 and are recorded on an undiscounted basis. In light of the uncertainties inherent in a longer-term forecast, management does not believe they can reasonably estimate the indemnity and medical costs that might be incurred after 2042 related to such potential claims. It is possible Duke Energy Carolinas may incur asbestos liabilities in excess of the recorded reserves.
Duke Energy Carolinas has third-party insurance to cover certain losses related to asbestos-related injuries and damages above an aggregate self-insured retention. Receivables for insurance recoveries were $595 million and $644 million at December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These amounts are classified in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets and Receivables within Current Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Any future payments up to the policy limit will be reimbursed by the third-party insurance carrier. Duke Energy Carolinas is not aware of any uncertainties regarding the legal sufficiency of insurance claims. Duke Energy Carolinas believes the insurance recovery asset is probable of recovery as the insurance carrier continues to have a strong financial strength rating.
The reserve for credit losses for insurance receivables for the asbestos-related injuries and damages is $12 million for Duke Energy and Duke Energy Carolinas as of December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021. The insurance receivable is evaluated based on the risk of default and the historical losses, current conditions and expected conditions around collectability. Management evaluates the risk of default annually based on payment history, credit rating and changes in the risk of default from credit agencies.
Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida
Spent Nuclear Fuel Matters
On June 18, 2018, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida sued the U.S. in the U.S. Court of Federal Claims for damages incurred for the period 2014 through 2018. The lawsuit claimed the DOE breached a contract in failing to accept spent nuclear fuel under the Nuclear Waste Policy Act of 1982 and asserted damages for the cost of on-site storage in the amount of $100 million and $200 million for Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively.
On March 30, 2022, the DOE and Duke Energy Progress executed a settlement agreement, pursuant to which Duke Energy Progress would receive damages for costs incurred between 2014 and 2018 and would be able to submit future costs on a defined schedule. In April 2022, Duke Energy Progress received $87 million in proceeds that related to damages incurred in 2014 through 2018.
On May 2, 2022, the DOE and Duke Energy Florida executed a settlement agreement, pursuant to which Duke Energy Florida would receive damages for costs incurred between 2014 and 2018 and would be able to submit costs incurred in 2019 and 2020 pursuant to an audit process. In June 2022, Duke Energy Florida received $180 million in proceeds that related to damages incurred in 2014 through 2018.
154

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Duke Energy Indiana
Coal Ash Basin Closure Plan Appeal
On January 27, 2020, Hoosier Environmental Council (HEC) filed a Petition for Administrative Review with the Indiana Office of Environmental Adjudication challenging the Indiana Department of Environmental Management’s (IDEM's) December 10, 2019 partial approval of Duke Energy Indiana’s ash pond closure plan at Duke Energy's Gallagher power station. After hearing oral arguments in early April 2021 on Duke Energy Indiana's and HEC's competing Motions for Summary Judgment, on May 4, 2021, the administrative court rejected all of HEC’s claims and issued a ruling in favor of Duke Energy Indiana. On June 3, 2021, HEC filed an appeal in Superior Court to seek judicial review of the order. Briefing on the appeal was completed on December 13, 2021.
On January 11, 2022, Duke Energy Indiana received a compliance obligation letter from the EPA notifying the company that the two basins at issue in the litigation are subject to requirements of the CCR Rule. The letter does not provide a deadline for compliance. Duke Energy Indiana is proceeding with surface impoundment closure at its Indiana sites consistent with EPA’s guidance, the federal CCR rule, and Indiana law, as applicable.
On April 21, 2022, HEC filed a motion requesting that the court hold a hearing within 45 days and also take judicial notice of the EPA's January 11, 2022 letter. On April 22, 2022, Duke Energy Indiana sent IDEM a letter withdrawing the closure plans for the Gallagher North Ash Pond and Primary Pond Ash Fill. After acknowledgment by IDEM of withdrawal of these closure plans, Duke Energy Indiana filed a Motion to Dismiss the litigation as moot on April 28, 2022, which IDEM supported, and the court granted the Motion to Dismiss on July 8, 2022.
Coal Ash Insurance Coverage Litigation
In June 2022, Duke Energy Indiana filed a civil action in Indiana Superior Court against various insurance companies seeking declaratory relief with respect to insurance coverage for coal combustion residuals-related expenses and liabilities covered by third-party liability insurance policies. The insurance policies cover the 1969-1972 and 1984-1985 periods and provide third-party liability insurance for claims and suits alleging property damage, bodily injury and personal injury (or a combination thereof). A trial date has not yet been set. Duke Energy Indiana cannot predict the outcome of this matter.
Other Litigation and Legal Proceedings
The Duke Energy Registrants are involved in other legal, tax and regulatory proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve significant amounts. The Duke Energy Registrants believe the final disposition of these proceedings will not have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position for the years presented. Reserves are classified on the Consolidated Balance Sheets in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities and Other within Current Liabilities.
OTHER COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
General
As part of their normal business, the Duke Energy Registrants are party to various financial guarantees, performance guarantees and other contractual commitments to extend guarantees of credit and other assistance to various subsidiaries, investees and other third parties. These guarantees involve elements of performance and credit risk, which are not fully recognized on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and have uncapped maximum potential payments. However, the Duke Energy Registrants do not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on their results of operations, cash flows or financial position. See Note 8 for more information.
Purchase Obligations
Purchased Power
Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Ohio have ongoing purchased power contracts, including renewable energy contracts, with other utilities, wholesale marketers, co-generators and qualified facilities. These purchased power contracts generally provide for capacity and energy payments. In addition, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have various contracts to secure transmission rights.
The following table presents executory purchased power contracts with terms exceeding one year, excluding contracts classified as leases.
  Minimum Purchase Amount at December 31, 2022
Contract
(in millions)Expiration20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Duke Energy Progress(a)
2028-2032$22 $21 $22 $18 $19 $27 $129 
Duke Energy Florida(b)
2024-2025300 267 91 — — — 658 
Duke Energy Ohio(c)
202455 36 — — — — 91 
(a)    Contracts represent between 18% and 100% of net plant output.
(b)    Contracts represent 100% of net plant output.
(c)    Share of net plant output varies. Excludes PPA with OVEC.
155

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSCOMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Gas Supply and Capacity Contracts
Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont routinely enter into long-term natural gas supply commodity and capacity commitments and other agreements that commit future cash flows to acquire services needed in their businesses. These commitments include pipeline and storage capacity contracts and natural gas supply contracts to provide service to customers. Costs arising from the natural gas supply commodity and capacity commitments, while significant, are pass-through costs to customers and are generally fully recoverable through the fuel adjustment or PGA procedures and prudence reviews in North Carolina and South Carolina and under the Tennessee Incentive Plan in Tennessee. In the Midwest, these costs are recovered via the Gas Cost Recovery Rate in Ohio or the Gas Cost Adjustment Clause in Kentucky. The time periods for fixed payments under pipeline and storage capacity contracts are up to 20 years. The time periods for fixed payments under natural gas supply contracts are up to four years. The time period for the natural gas supply purchase commitments is up to nine years.
Certain storage and pipeline capacity contracts require the payment of demand charges that are based on rates approved by the FERC in order to maintain rights to access the natural gas storage or pipeline capacity on a firm basis during the contract term. The demand charges that are incurred in each period are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income as part of natural gas purchases and are included in Cost of natural gas.
The following table presents future unconditional purchase obligations under natural gas supply and capacity contracts as of December 31, 2022.
(in millions)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Duke Energy Ohio$85 $101 $85 $56 $52 $616 $995 
Piedmont319 313 267 213 203 587 1,902 
6. LEASES
As part of its operations, Duke Energy leases certain aircraft, space on communication towers, industrial equipment, fleet vehicles, fuel transportation (barges and railcars), land and office space under various terms and expiration dates. Additionally, Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Indiana have finance leases related to firm natural gas pipeline transportation capacity. Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida have entered into certain PPAs, which are classified as finance and operating leases.
Duke Energy has certain lease agreements, which include variable lease payments that are based on the usage of an asset. These variable lease payments are not included in the measurement of the ROU assets or operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Certain Duke Energy lease agreements include options for renewal and early termination. The intent to renew a lease varies depending on the lease type and asset. Renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised are included in the lease measurements. The decision to terminate a lease early is dependent on various economic factors. No termination options have been included in any of the lease measurements.
Duke Energy Carolinas entered into a sale-leaseback arrangement in December 2019, to construct and occupy an office tower. The lease agreement was evaluated as a sale-leaseback of real estate and it was determined that the transaction did not qualify for sale-leaseback accounting. As a result, the transaction is being accounted for as a financing. For this transaction, Duke Energy Carolinas will continue to record the real estate on the Consolidated Balance Sheets within Property, Plant and Equipment as if it were the legal owner and will continue to recognize depreciation expense over the estimated useful life. In addition, the failed sale-leaseback obligation is reported within Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, with the monthly lease payments commencing after the construction phase being split between interest expense and principal pay down of the debt.
Piedmont has certain agreements with Duke Energy Carolinas for the construction and transportation of natural gas pipelines to supply its natural gas plant needs. Piedmont accounts for these pipeline lateral contracts as sales-type leases since the present value of the sum of the lease payments equals the fair value of the assets. These pipeline lateral assets owned by Piedmont had a current net investment basis of $2 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, and a long-term net investment basis of $201 million and $203 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively. These assets are classified in Other, within Current Assets and Other Noncurrent Assets, respectively, on Piedmont's Consolidated Balance Sheets. Duke Energy Carolinas accounts for the contracts as finance leases. The activity for these contracts is eliminated in consolidation at Duke Energy.
156

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES
The following tables present the components of lease expense.
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Operating lease expense(a)
$229 $39 $153 $83 $70 $10 $19 $6 
Short-term lease expense(a)
4  1  1  2  
Variable lease expense(a)
61 (1)60 37 23   1 
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets(b)
151 6 61 41 20    
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
50 32 49 45 4  1  
Total finance lease expense201 38 110 86 24  1  
Total lease expense$495 $76 $324 $206 $118 $10 $22 $7 
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Operating lease expense(a)
$245 $43 $155 $83 $72 $11 $18 $
Short-term lease expense(a)
— — — 
Variable lease expense(a)
41 17 22 10 12 — — 
Finance lease expense
Amortization of leased assets(b)
219 37 18 19 — — 
Interest on lease liabilities(c)
55 33 48 42 — — — 
Total finance lease expense274 38 85 60 25 — — 
Total lease expense$565 $98 $264 $154 $110 $11 $21 $
(a)    Included in Operations, maintenance and other or, for barges and railcars, Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(b)    Included in Depreciation and amortization on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(c)    Included in Interest Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The following table presents operating lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to operating lease liabilities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2023$225 $23 $118 $64 $54 $2 $6 $4 
2024207 21 110 56 54 2 5 4 
2025175 14 96 42 54 2 5 4 
2026161 13 99 45 54 2 4  
2027134 9 73 46 27 2 4  
Thereafter322 37 253 209 44 15 45 1 
Total operating lease payments1,224 117 749 462 287 25 69 13 
Less: present value discount(169)(20)(107)(76)(31)(7)(18) 
Total operating lease liabilities(a)
$1,055 $97 $642 $386 $256 $18 $51 $13 
(a)    Certain operating lease payments include renewal options that are reasonably certain to be exercised.
157

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES
The following table presents finance lease maturities and a reconciliation of the undiscounted cash flows to finance lease liabilities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndiana
2023$198 $38 $103 $78 $25 $1 
2024143 38 88 79 9 1 
202576 38 85 80 5 1 
202677 38 86 81 5 1 
202774 38 82 81 1 1 
Thereafter584 427 555 555  23 
Total finance lease payments1,152 617 999 954 45 28 
Less: amounts representing interest(388)(333)(371)(367)(4)(19)
Total finance lease liabilities$764 $284 $628 $587 $41 $9 
The following tables contain additional information related to leases.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)ClassificationEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Assets
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,042 $78 $628 $370 $258 $18 $49 $4 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment810 284 674 590 84  6  
Total lease assets$1,852 $362 $1,302 $960 $342 $18 $55 $4 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingOther current liabilities$179 $14 $96 $51 $45 $1 $4 $ 
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt153 7 57 35 22    
Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities876 83 546 335 211 17 47 13 
FinanceLong-Term Debt611 277 571 552 19  9  
Total lease liabilities$1,819 $381 $1,270 $973 $297 $18 $60 $13 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)ClassificationEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Assets
OperatingOperating lease ROU assets, net$1,136 $92 $691 $389 $302 $19 $53 $16 
FinanceNet property, plant and equipment950 302 729 627 102 — — 
Total lease assets$2,086 $394 $1,420 $1,016 $404 $19 $60 $16 
Liabilities
Current
OperatingOther current liabilities$184 $22 $94 $50 $44 $$$
FinanceCurrent maturities of long-term debt151 61 41 20 — — — 
Noncurrent
OperatingOperating lease liabilities940 78 606 350 256 18 50 14 
FinanceLong-Term Debt764 283 629 588 41 — 10 — 
Total lease liabilities$2,039 $389 $1,390 $1,029 $361 $19 $64 $19 
158

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSLEASES
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$230 $24 $118 $63 $55 $2 $6 $4 
Operating cash flows from finance leases50 32 49 45 4  1  
Financing cash flows from finance leases151 6 61 41 20    
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating(b)
$111 $10 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities(a)
Operating cash flows from operating leases$245 $25 $117 $62 $55 $$$
Operating cash flows from finance leases55 33 48 42 — — — 
Financing cash flows from finance leases219 37 18 19 — — 
Lease assets obtained in exchange for new lease liabilities (non-cash)
Operating(b)
$182 $$99 $99 $— $— $— $— 
Finance322 — 322 322 — — — — 
(a)    No amounts were classified as investing cash flows from operating leases.
(b)    Does not include ROU assets recorded as a result of the adoption of the new lease standard.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases81089615151
Finance leases1017121212 23 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
Operating leases3.4 %3.8 %3.6 %3.5 %3.8 %4.2 %4.0 %3.3 %
Finance leases7.7 %11.5 %9.1 %9.1 %8.0 % %11.9 % %
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Weighted average remaining lease term (years)
Operating leases89810716164
Finance leases1018131311— 24— 
Weighted average discount rate(a)
Operating leases3.5 %3.5 %3.6 %3.4 %3.8 %4.2 %4.1 %3.6 %
Finance leases7.3 %11.6 %9.0 %9.0 %8.2 %— %11.9 %— %
(a)    The discount rate is calculated using the rate implicit in a lease if it is readily determinable. Generally, the rate used by the lessor is not provided to Duke Energy and in these cases the incremental borrowing rate is used. Duke Energy will typically use its fully collateralized incremental borrowing rate as of the commencement date to calculate and record the lease. The incremental borrowing rate is influenced by the lessee’s credit rating and lease term and as such may differ for individual leases, embedded leases or portfolios of leased assets.
159

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
7. DEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Summary of Debt and Related Terms
The following tables summarize outstanding debt and includes debt attributable to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details.
 December 31, 2022
Weighted
AverageDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
InterestDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)RateEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2023-20824.20 %$29,585 $1,150 $2,600 $ $950 $1,330 $697 $3,390 
Secured debt, maturing 2023-20524.11 %5,632 1,317 2,383 1,155 1,228    
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2023-2052(a)
3.89 %32,645 11,306 16,350 8,776 7,576 1,850 3,138  
Finance leases, maturing 2023-2051(b)
7.90 %764 284 628 587 41  9  
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2046(c)
3.84 %1,331  500 500  77 352  
Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
4.50 %4,582        
Money pool/intercompany borrowings  1,533 993 389 605 522 585 514 
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment (5)       
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
 1,016 (21)(40)(23)(16)(25)(17)(9)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
(383)(70)(132)(59)(70)(12)(22)(18)
Total debt4.09 %$75,167 $15,499 $23,282 $11,325 $10,314 $3,742 $4,742 $3,877 
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper (3,952)       
Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings (1,233)(843)(238)(605)(497)(435)(514)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
 (4,154)(1,018)(697)(369)(328)(475)(303)(45)
Total long-term debt(g)
$67,061 $13,248 $21,742 $10,718 $9,381 $2,770 $4,004 $3,318 
(a)Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)Duke Energy includes $164 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Florida related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)Includes $625 million classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper program was 15 days.
(e)Duke Energy includes $1,057 million and $85 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)Duke Energy includes $27 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.
160

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
 December 31, 2021
Weighted
AverageDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
InterestDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)RateEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unsecured debt, maturing 2022-20823.71 %$24,564 $1,150 $2,250 $— $150 $1,330 $700 $2,990 
Secured debt, maturing 2022-20522.50 %5,584 1,094 2,397 1,120 1,278 — — — 
First mortgage bonds, maturing 2022-2051(a)
3.87 %31,026 10,507 15,450 8,375 7,075 1,850 3,219 — 
Finance leases, maturing 2022-2051(b)
5.81 %915 289 690 629 61 — 10 — 
Tax-exempt bonds, maturing 2027-2041(c)
0.65 %360 — 48 48 — 27 285 — 
Notes payable and commercial paper(d)
0.35 %3,929 — — — — — — — 
Money pool/intercompany borrowings — 526 2,959 322 199 128 150 518 
Fair value hedge carrying value adjustment — — — — — — 
Unamortized debt discount and premium, net(e)
 1,119 (21)(34)(19)(14)(27)(18)(6)
Unamortized debt issuance costs(f)
(362)(67)(128)(54)(68)(13)(23)(16)
Total debt3.50 %$67,139 $13,482 $23,632 $10,421 $8,681 $3,295 $4,323 $3,486 
Short-term notes payable and commercial paper (3,304)— — — — — — — 
Short-term money pool/intercompany borrowings— (226)(2,809)(172)(199)(103)— (518)
Current maturities of long-term debt(g)
 (3,387)(362)(1,082)(556)(76)— (84)— 
Total long-term debt(g)
$60,448 $12,894 $19,741 $9,693 $8,406 $3,192 $4,239 $2,968 
(a)    Substantially all electric utility property is mortgaged under mortgage bond indentures.
(b)    Duke Energy includes $256 million of finance lease purchase accounting adjustments related to Duke Energy Florida related to PPAs that are not accounted for as finance leases in their respective financial statements because of grandfathering provisions in GAAP.
(c)    Substantially all tax-exempt bonds are secured by first mortgage bonds, letters of credit or the Master Credit Facility.
(d)    Includes $625 million that was classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets due to the existence of long-term credit facilities that backstop these commercial paper balances, along with Duke Energy’s ability and intent to refinance these balances on a long-term basis. The weighted average days to maturity for Duke Energy's commercial paper programs was 15 days.
(e)    Duke Energy includes $1,121 million and $100 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to Progress Energy and Piedmont, respectively.
(f)    Duke Energy includes $29 million in purchase accounting adjustments primarily related to the merger with Progress Energy.
(g)     Refer to Note 18 for additional information on amounts from consolidated VIEs.
Current Maturities of Long-Term Debt
The following table shows the significant components of Current maturities of Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Duke Energy Registrants currently anticipate satisfying these obligations with cash on hand and proceeds from additional borrowings.
(in millions)Maturity DateInterest RateDecember 31, 2022
Unsecured Debt
Duke Energy (Parent)April 20232.875 %$350 
Duke Energy (Parent)(a)
June 20233.469 %500 
Duke Energy (Parent)October 20233.950 %400 
Duke Energy Ohio(a)
October 20234.272 %150 
Duke Energy Indiana(a)
October 20234.118 %300 
First Mortgage Bonds
Duke Energy CarolinasMarch 20232.500 %500 
Duke Energy CarolinasMarch 20233.050 %500 
Duke Energy ProgressSeptember 20233.375 %300 
Duke Energy OhioSeptember 20233.800 %300 
Other(b)
854 
Current maturities of long-term debt$4,154 
(a)    Debt has a floating interest rate.
(b)    Includes finance lease obligations, amortizing debt, tax-exempt bonds with mandatory put options and small bullet maturities.
161

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Maturities and Call Options
The following table shows the annual maturities of long-term debt for the next five years and thereafter. Amounts presented exclude short-term notes payable, commercial paper and money pool borrowings and debt issuance costs for the Subsidiary Registrants.
 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)
Energy(a)
CarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2023$4,154 $1,018 $697 $369 $328 $475 $303 $45 
20243,216 19 939 72 867  4 40 
20254,322 491 1,040 975 65 245 4 205 
20262,682 621 345 279 66 45 4 40 
20273,203 323 947 233 714 102 177 300 
Thereafter52,999 11,884 18,642 9,238 7,753 2,415 3,853 2,760 
Total long-term debt, including current maturities$70,576 $14,356 $22,610 $11,166 $9,793 $3,282 $4,345 $3,390 
(a)    Excludes $1,169 million in purchase accounting adjustments related to the Progress Energy merger and the Piedmont acquisition.
The Duke Energy Registrants have the ability under certain debt facilities to call and repay the obligation prior to its scheduled maturity. Therefore, the actual timing of future cash repayments could be materially different than as presented above.
Short-Term Obligations Classified as Long-Term Debt
Tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder and certain commercial paper issuances and money pool borrowings are classified as Long-Term Debt on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. These tax-exempt bonds, commercial paper issuances and money pool borrowings, which are short-term obligations by nature, are classified as long-term due to Duke Energy’s intent and ability to utilize such borrowings as long-term financing. As Duke Energy’s Master Credit Facility and other bilateral letter of credit agreements have non-cancelable terms in excess of one year as of the balance sheet date, Duke Energy has the ability to refinance these short-term obligations on a long-term basis. The following tables show short-term obligations classified as long-term debt.
 December 31, 2022 and 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasProgressOhioIndiana
Tax-exempt bonds$312 $ $ $27 $285 
Commercial paper(a)
625 300 150 25 150 
Total$937 $300 $150 $52 $435 
(a)    Progress Energy amounts are equal to Duke Energy Progress amounts.
Summary of Significant Debt Issuances
In January 2023, Duke Energy Carolinas issued $1.8 billion of first mortgage bonds. The issuance was split between a $900 million,10-year tranche at 4.95% and a $900 million, 30-year tranche at 5.35%. The net proceeds will be used to refinance $1 billion of Duke Energy Carolinas bonds maturing in March 2023, to pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
162

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
The following tables summarize significant debt issuances (in millions).
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
MaturityInterestDukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Issuance DateDateRateEnergy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaPiedmont
Unsecured Debt
May 2022(a)
May 20525.050 %$400 $ $ $ $ $400 
June 2022(b)
June 20284.750 %645 645     
June 2022(b)
June 20345.306 %537 537     
August 2022(c)
March 20284.300 %900 900     
August 2022(c)
August 20324.500 %1,150 1,150     
August 2022(c)
August 20525.000 %1,150 1,150    
December 2022(d)
December 20255.000 %500 500     
December 2022(d)
December 20275.000 %500 500     
First Mortgage Bonds
March 2022(e)
March 20322.850 %500  500    
March 2022(e)
March 20523.550 %650  650    
March 2022(e)
April 20323.400 %500   500   
March 2022(e)
April 20524.000 %

400   400   
November 2022(f)
November 20525.950 %500    500  
Tax-exempt Bonds
June 2022(g)
September 20304.000 %168 168     
June 2022(g)
November 20394.250 %234 234     
September 2022(h)
October 20463.300 %200   200  
September 2022(i)
October 20463.700 %210   210  
September 2022(i)
October 20464.000 %42   42  
Total issuances$9,186 $5,784 $1,150 $1,352 $500 $400 
(a)Debt issued to repay a portion of outstanding intercompany short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Duke Energy (Parent) issued 600 million euros aggregate principal amount of 3.10% senior notes due June 2028 and 500 million euros aggregate principal amount of 3.85% senior notes due June 2034. Debt issued to repay a $500 million debt maturity, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes. Duke Energy's obligations under its euro-denominated fixed-rate notes were effectively converted to fixed-rate U.S. dollars at issuance through cross-currency swaps, mitigating foreign currency exchange risk associated with the interest and principal payments. See Note 15 for additional information.
(c)Debt issued to repay a portion of short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(d)Proceeds will be used to repay a portion of commercial paper and for general corporate purposes.
(e)Debt issued to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, existing or new eligible projects under the sustainable financing framework.
(f)Debt issued to repay a portion of outstanding intercompany short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(g)Debt issued to refund the Ohio Air Quality Development Revenue Refunding bonds, previously held in treasury, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain solid waste disposal facilities. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is June 1, 2027.
(h)Debt issued to provide funds to refund the prior bonds, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain air and water pollution control equipment and solid waste disposal equipment. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is October 1, 2026.
(i)Debt issued to provide funds to refund the prior bonds, which were used to finance or refinance portions of certain air and water pollution control equipment and solid waste disposal equipment. The mandatory purchase date of these bonds is October 1, 2030.
163

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
MaturityInterestDukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
Issuance DateDateRateEnergy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaPiedmont
Unsecured Debt
March 2021a)
March 20312.500 %$350 $— $— $— $— $350 
June 2021(b)(c)
June 20230.299 %500 500 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20312.550 %1,000 1,000 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20413.300 %750 750 — — — — 
June 2021(c)
June 20513.500 %750 750 — — — — 
September 2021(d)
January 20823.250 %500 500 — — — — 
Secured Debt
November 2021(e)
July 20311.679 %100 — 100 — — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20412.617 %137 — 137 — — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20281.295 %221 — — 221 — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20372.387 %352 — — 352 — — 
November 2021(e)
July 20412.799 %197 — — 197 — — 
First Mortgage Bonds
April 2021(f)
April 20312.550 %550 — 550 — — — 
April 2021(f)
April 20513.450 %450 — 450 — — — 
August 2021(g)
August 20312.000 %650 — — 650 — — 
August 2021(g)
August 20512.900 %450 — — 450 — — 
December 2021(h)
December 20312.400 %650 — — — 650 — 
December 2021(h)
December 20513.000 %500 — — — 500 — 
Total issuances$8,107 $3,500 $1,237 $1,870 $1,150 $350 
(a)Debt issued to repay at maturity $160 million senior unsecured notes due June 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(b)Debt has a floating interest rate.
(c)Debt issued to repay $1.75 billion of Duke Energy (Parent) debt maturities, to repay a portion of short-term debt and for general corporate purposes.
(d)Debt issued to repay in October 2021 $500 million of Duke Energy (Parent) unsecured notes. The interest rate resets every five years.
(e)Debt issued to finance the North Carolina portion of storm restoration expenditures related to Hurricane Florence, Hurricane Michael, Hurricane Dorian and Winter Storm Diego.
(f)Debt issued to repay at maturity $500 million first mortgage bonds due June 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(g)Debt issued to repay at maturity a total of $600 million first mortgage bonds due September 2021, pay down short-term debt and for general company purposes.
(h)Proceeds were used to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, existing or new eligible projects under the sustainable financing framework.
AVAILABLE CREDIT FACILITIES
Master Credit Facility
In March 2022, Duke Energy amended its existing Master Credit Facility to increase the amount of the facility from $8 billion to $9 billion and to extend the termination date to March 2027. The Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, have borrowing capacity under the Master Credit Facility up to a specified sublimit for each borrower. Duke Energy has the unilateral ability at any time to increase or decrease the borrowing sublimits of each borrower, subject to a maximum sublimit for each borrower. The amount available under the Master Credit Facility has been reduced to backstop issuances of commercial paper, certain letters of credit and variable-rate demand tax-exempt bonds that may be put to the Duke Energy Registrants at the option of the holder.
164

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
The table below includes the current borrowing sublimits and available capacity under these credit facilities.
 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy(Parent)CarolinasProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Facility size(a)
$9,000 $2,375 $1,925 $800 $1,150 $900 $1,050 $800 
Reduction to backstop issuances
Commercial paper(b)
(3,685)463 (1,533)(389)(605)(522)(585)(514)
Outstanding letters of credit(40)(27)(4)(2)(7)   
Tax-exempt bonds(81)     (81) 
Available capacity$5,194 $2,811 $388 $409 $538 $378 $384 $286 
(a)    Represents the sublimit of each borrower.
(b)    Duke Energy issued $625 million of commercial paper and loaned the proceeds through the money pool to Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. The balances are classified as Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Duke Energy (Parent) Term Loan Facility
On March 9, 2022, Duke Energy (Parent) entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement (Credit Agreement) with commitments totaling $1.4 billion maturing on March 9, 2024. The maturity date of the Credit Agreement may be extended for up to two years by request of Duke Energy (Parent), upon satisfaction of certain conditions contained in the Credit Agreement. Borrowings under the facility were used to repay amounts drawn under the Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility and for general corporate purposes, including repayment of a portion of Duke Energy's outstanding commercial paper. In December 2022, Duke Energy (Parent) repaid $400 million of the term loan. The balance is classified as Long-Term Debt on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Three-Year Revolving Credit Facility was terminated in March 2022.
Duke Energy Florida Term Loan Facility
In October 2022, Duke Energy Florida entered into a term loan facility with commitments totaling $800 million expiring in April 2024. The term loan was fully drawn at the time of closing In October and borrowings were used for storm costs, under-collected fuel and general company purposes. The balance is classified as Long-Term Debt on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheet.
Other Debt Matters
In September 2022, Duke Energy filed a Form S-3 with the SEC. Under this Form S-3, which is uncapped, the Duke Energy Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, may issue debt and other securities, including preferred stock, in the future at amounts, prices and with terms to be determined at the time of future offerings. The registration statement was filed to replace a similar prior filing upon expiration of its three-year term and also allows for the issuance of common and preferred stock by Duke Energy.
Also in September 2022, to replace another similar prior filing, Duke Energy filed an effective Form S-3 with the SEC to sell up to $4 billion of variable denomination floating-rate demand notes, called PremierNotes. The Form S-3 states that no more than $2 billion of the notes will be outstanding at any particular time. The notes are offered on a continuous basis and bear interest at a floating rate per annum determined by the Duke Energy PremierNotes Committee, or its designee, on a weekly basis. The interest rate payable on notes held by an investor may vary based on the principal amount of the investment. The notes have no stated maturity date, are non-transferable and may be redeemed in whole or in part by Duke Energy or at the investor’s option at any time. The balance as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, was $897 million and $1,066 million, respectively. The notes are short-term debt obligations of Duke Energy and are reflected as Notes payable and commercial paper on Duke Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Money Pool and Intercompany Credit Agreements
The Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, are eligible to receive support for their short-term borrowing needs through participation with Duke Energy and certain of its subsidiaries in a money pool arrangement. Under this arrangement, those companies with short-term funds may provide short-term loans to affiliates participating in this arrangement. The money pool is structured such that the Subsidiary Registrants, excluding Progress Energy, separately manage their cash needs and working capital requirements. Accordingly, there is no net settlement of receivables and payables between money pool participants. Duke Energy (Parent), may loan funds to its participating subsidiaries, but may not borrow funds through the money pool. Accordingly, as the money pool activity is between Duke Energy and its subsidiaries, all money pool balances are eliminated within Duke Energy’s Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Money pool receivable balances are reflected within Notes receivable from affiliated companies on the Subsidiary Registrants’ Consolidated Balance Sheets. Money pool payable balances are reflected within either Notes payable to affiliated companies or Long-Term Debt Payable to Affiliated Companies on the Subsidiary Registrants’ Consolidated Balance Sheets.
In March 2022, Progress Energy closed a revolving credit agreement with Duke Energy (Parent), which allowed up to $2.5 billion in intercompany borrowings.
165

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDEBT AND CREDIT FACILITIES
Restrictive Debt Covenants
The Duke Energy Registrants’ debt and credit agreements contain various financial and other covenants. Duke Energy's Master Credit Facility contains a covenant requiring the debt-to-total capitalization ratio not to exceed 65% for each borrower, excluding Piedmont, and 70% for Piedmont. Failure to meet those covenants beyond applicable grace periods could result in accelerated due dates and/or termination of the agreements. As of December 31, 2022, Duke Energy presented approximately $131 million of long-term debt as current on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as a result of a technical default due to the bankruptcy filing of a Duke Energy customer. The Duke Energy Registrants were in compliance with all other covenants related to their debt agreements as of December 31, 2022. In addition, some credit agreements may allow for acceleration of payments or termination of the agreements due to nonpayment, or acceleration of other significant indebtedness of the borrower or some of its subsidiaries. None of the debt or credit agreements contain material adverse change clauses.
Other Loans
As of December 31, 2022, and 2021, Duke Energy had loans outstanding of $852 million, including $33 million at Duke Energy Progress and $819 million, including $34 million at Duke Energy Progress, respectively, against the cash surrender value of life insurance policies it owns on the lives of its executives. The amounts outstanding were carried as a reduction of the related cash surrender value that is included in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
8. GUARANTEES AND INDEMNIFICATIONS
Duke Energy has various financial and performance guarantees and indemnifications with non-consolidated entities, which are issued in the normal course of business. As discussed below, these contracts include performance guarantees, standby letters of credit, debt guarantees and indemnifications and include guarantees and indemnifications related to Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Duke Energy enters into these arrangements to facilitate commercial transactions with third parties by enhancing the value of the transaction to the third party. At December 31, 2022, Duke Energy does not believe conditions are likely for significant performance under these guarantees. To the extent liabilities are incurred as a result of the activities covered by the guarantees, such liabilities are included on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.
On January 2, 2007, Duke Energy completed the spin-off of its previously wholly owned natural gas businesses to shareholders. Guarantees issued by Duke Energy or its affiliates, or assigned to Duke Energy prior to the spin-off, remained with Duke Energy subsequent to the spin-off. Guarantees issued by Spectra Energy Capital, LLC (Spectra Capital) or its affiliates prior to the spin-off remained with Spectra Capital subsequent to the spin-off, except for guarantees that were later assigned to Duke Energy. Duke Energy has indemnified Spectra Capital against any losses incurred under certain of the guarantee obligations that remain with Spectra Capital. At December 31, 2022, the maximum potential amount of future payments associated with these guarantees were $40 million, the majority of which expire by 2028.
In October 2017, ACP executed a $3.4 billion revolving credit facility with a stated maturity date of October 2021. Duke Energy entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the ACP revolving credit facility. In July 2020, ACP reduced the size of the credit facility to $1.9 billion. Duke Energy's maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guarantee was $860 million as of December 31, 2020. This amount represented 47% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility and was recognized within Other Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2020, of which $95 million was previously recognized due the adoption of new guidance for credit losses effective January 1, 2020. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. See Notes 4 and 13 for more information.
In addition to the Spectra Capital and ACP revolving credit facility guarantees above, Duke Energy has issued performance guarantees to customers and other third parties that guarantee the payment and performance of other parties, including certain non-wholly owned entities, as well as guarantees of debt of certain non-consolidated entities. If such entities were to default on payments or performance, Duke Energy would be required under the guarantees to make payments on the obligations of these entities. The maximum potential amount of future payments required under these guarantees as of December 31, 2022, was $33 million of which all expire between 2024 and 2030, with the remaining performance guarantees having no contractual expiration. Additionally, certain guarantees have uncapped maximum potential payments; however, Duke Energy does not believe these guarantees will have a material effect on its results of operations, cash flows or financial position.
Duke Energy uses bank-issued standby letters of credit to secure the performance of wholly owned and non-wholly owned entities to a third party or customer. Under these arrangements, Duke Energy has payment obligations to the issuing bank that are triggered by a draw by the third party or customer due to the failure of the wholly owned or non-wholly owned entity to perform according to the terms of its underlying contract. At December 31, 2022, Duke Energy had issued a total of $667 million in letters of credit, which expire between 2023 and 2028. The unused amount under these letters of credit was $35 million.
Duke Energy recognized $2 million and $3 million as of December 31, 2022, and 2021, respectively, primarily in Other within Other Noncurrent Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, for the guarantees discussed above. As current estimates change, additional losses related to guarantees and indemnifications to third parties, which could be material, may be recorded by the Duke Energy Registrants in the future.
9. JOINT OWNERSHIP OF GENERATING AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
The Duke Energy Registrants maintain ownership interests in certain jointly owned generating and transmission facilities. The Duke Energy Registrants are entitled to a share of the generating capacity and output of each unit equal to their respective ownership interests. The Duke Energy Registrants pay their ownership share of additional construction costs, fuel inventory purchases and operating expenses. The Duke Energy Registrants share of revenues and operating costs of the jointly owned facilities is included within the corresponding line in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Each participant in the jointly owned facilities must provide its own financing.
166

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSJOINT OWNERSHIP OF GENERATING AND TRANSMISSION FACILITIES
The following table presents the Duke Energy Registrants' interest of jointly owned plant or facilities and amounts included on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All facilities are operated by the Duke Energy Registrants and are included in the Electric Utilities and Infrastructure segment.
 December 31, 2022
Construction
OwnershipProperty, PlantAccumulatedWork in
(in millions except for ownership interest)Interestand EquipmentDepreciationProgress
Duke Energy Carolinas    
Catawba (units 1 and 2)(a)
19.25 %$1,047 $546 $32 
W.S. Lee CC(b)
87.27 %613 86 48 
Duke Energy Indiana    
Gibson (unit 5)(c)
50.05 %450 241 2 
Vermillion(d)
62.50 %182 113 1 
Transmission and local facilities(c)
Various6,718 1,510 157 
(a)    Jointly owned with North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 1, NCEMC and PMPA.
(b)    Jointly owned with NCEMC.
(c)    Jointly owned with WVPA and IMPA.
(d)    Jointly owned with WVPA.
10. ASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
Duke Energy records an ARO when it has a legal obligation to incur retirement costs associated with the retirement of a long-lived asset and the obligation can be reasonably estimated. Certain assets of the Duke Energy Registrants have an indeterminate life, such as transmission and distribution facilities, and thus the fair value of the retirement obligation is not reasonably estimable. A liability for these AROs will be recorded when a fair value is determinable.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ regulated operations accrue costs of removal for property that does not have an associated legal retirement obligation based on regulatory orders from state commissions. These costs of removal are recorded as a regulatory liability in accordance with regulatory accounting treatment. The Duke Energy Registrants do not accrue the estimated cost of removal for any nonregulated assets. See Note 4 for the estimated cost of removal for assets without an associated legal retirement obligation, which are included in Regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents the AROs recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Decommissioning of nuclear power facilities(a)
$7,261 $3,009 $4,217 $3,948 $270 $ $ $ 
Closure of ash impoundments5,176 2,309 1,862 1,833 29 95 911  
Other291 64 102 42 59 59 40 26 
Total asset retirement obligation$12,728 $5,382 $6,181 $5,823 $358 $154 $951 $26 
Less: Current portion773 261 289 288 1 17 207  
Total noncurrent asset retirement obligation$11,955 $5,121 $5,892 $5,535 $357 $137 $744 $26 
(a)    Duke Energy amount includes purchase accounting adjustments related to the merger with Progress Energy.
Nuclear Decommissioning Liability
AROs related to nuclear decommissioning are based on site-specific cost studies. The NCUC, PSCSC and FPSC require updated cost estimates for decommissioning nuclear plants every five years.
The following table summarizes information about the most recent site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost studies. Decommissioning costs are stated in 2018 or 2019 dollars, depending on the year of the cost study, and include costs to decommission plant components not subject to radioactive contamination.
Annual FundingDecommissioning
(in millions)
Requirement(a)
Costs(a)
Year of Cost Study
Duke Energy$10 $9,105 2018 or 2019
Duke Energy Carolinas(b)(c)
 4,365 2018
Duke Energy Progress(d)
10 4,181 2019
Duke Energy Florida(e)
 559 N/A
167

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
(a)    Amount represents annual funding requirement for the current fiscal year. Amounts for Progress Energy equal the sum of Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida.
(b)    Decommissioning costs for Duke Energy Carolinas reflects its ownership interest in jointly owned reactors. Other joint owners are responsible for decommissioning costs related to their interest in the reactors.
(c)    Duke Energy Carolinas' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2018 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019. A new funding study was also completed and filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in 2019.
(d)    Duke Energy Progress' site-specific nuclear decommissioning cost study completed in 2019 was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in March 2020. Duke Energy Progress also completed a funding study, which was filed with the NCUC and PSCSC in July 2020. In October 2021, Duke Energy Progress filed the 2019 nuclear decommissioning cost study with the FERC, as well as a revised rate schedule for decommissioning expense to be collected from wholesale customers. The FERC accepted the filing, as filed on December 9, 2021.
(e)    During 2019, Duke Energy Florida reached an agreement to transfer decommissioning work for Crystal River Unit 3 to a third party and decommissioning costs are based on the agreement with this third party rather than a cost study. Regulatory approval was received from the NRC and the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively.
Nuclear Decommissioning Trust Funds
Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida each maintain NDTFs that are intended to pay for the decommissioning costs of their respective nuclear power plants. The NDTF investments are managed and invested in accordance with applicable requirements of various regulatory bodies including the NRC, FERC, NCUC, PSCSC, FPSC and the IRS.
Use of the NDTF investments is restricted to nuclear decommissioning activities including license termination, spent fuel and site restoration. The license termination and spent fuel obligations relate to contaminated decommissioning and are recorded as AROs. The site restoration obligation relates to non-contaminated decommissioning and is recorded to cost of removal within Regulatory liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
The following table presents the fair value of NDTF assets legally restricted for purposes of settling AROs associated with nuclear decommissioning. Duke Energy Florida entered into an agreement with a third party to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and was granted an exemption from the NRC, which allows for use of the NDTF for all aspects of nuclear decommissioning. The entire balance of Duke Energy Florida's NDTF may be applied toward license termination, spent fuel and site restoration costs incurred to decommission Crystal River Unit 3 and is excluded from the table below. See Note 17 for additional information related to the fair value of the Duke Energy Registrants' NDTFs.
December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Duke Energy$7,466 $8,933 
Duke Energy Carolinas4,208 5,068 
Duke Energy Progress3,258 3,865 
Nuclear Operating Licenses
As described in Note 4, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress intend to seek renewal of operating licenses and 20-year license extensions for all of their nuclear stations. The following table includes the current expiration of nuclear operating licenses.
UnitYear of Expiration
Duke Energy Carolinas
Catawba Units 1 and 22043
McGuire Unit 12041
McGuire Unit 22043
Oconee Units 1 and 22033
Oconee Unit 32034
Duke Energy Progress
Brunswick Unit 12036
Brunswick Unit 22034
Harris2046
Robinson2030
The NRC has acknowledged permanent cessation of operation and permanent removal of fuel from the reactor vessel at Crystal River Unit 3. Therefore, the license no longer authorizes operation of the reactor. During 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into an agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3. Regulatory approval was received from the NRC and the FPSC in April 2020 and August 2020, respectively. See Note 4 for more information.
Closure of Ash Impoundments
The Duke Energy Registrants are subject to state and federal regulations covering the closure of coal ash impoundments, including the EPA CCR rule and the Coal Ash Act, and other agreements. AROs recorded on the Duke Energy Registrants' Consolidated Balance Sheets include the legal obligation for closure of coal ash basins and the disposal of related ash as a result of these regulations and agreements.
168

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSASSET RETIREMENT OBLIGATIONS
The ARO amount recorded on the Consolidated Balance Sheets is based upon estimated closure costs for impacted ash impoundments. The amount recorded represents the discounted cash flows for estimated closure costs based upon specific closure plans. Actual costs to be incurred will be dependent upon factors that vary from site to site. The most significant factors are the method and time frame of closure at the individual sites. Closure methods considered include removing the water from ash basins, consolidating material as necessary and capping the ash with a synthetic barrier, excavating and relocating the ash to a lined structural fill or lined landfill or recycling the ash for concrete or some other beneficial use. The ultimate method and timetable for closure will be in compliance with standards set by federal and state regulations and other agreements. The ARO amount will be adjusted as additional information is gained through the closure and post-closure process, including acceptance and approval of compliance approaches, which may change management assumptions, and may result in a material change to the balance. See ARO Liability Rollforward section below for information on revisions made to the coal ash liability during 2022 and 2021.
Asset retirement costs associated with the AROs for operating plants and retired plants are included in Net property, plant and equipment and Regulatory assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. See Note 4 for additional information on Regulatory assets related to AROs and Note 5 for additional information on commitments and contingencies.
Cost recovery for future expenditures will be pursued through the normal ratemaking process with federal and state utility commissions, which permit recovery of necessary and prudently incurred costs associated with Duke Energy’s regulated operations. See Note 4 for additional information on recovery of coal ash costs.
ARO Liability Rollforward
The following tables present changes in the liability associated with AROs.
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Balance at December 31, 2020$12,854 $5,350 $6,149 $5,635 $514 $111 $1,176 $20 
Accretion expense(a)
504 242 229 212 17 35 
Liabilities settled(b)
(613)(210)(324)(214)(110)(3)(77)— 
Liabilities incurred in the current year14 — — — — 
Revisions in estimates of cash flows(c)
(159)(89)52 42 10 24 (147)
Balance at December 31, 202112,600 5,301 6,112 5,675 437 136 987 22 
Accretion expense(a)
501 242 229 215 14 6 30 1 
Liabilities settled(b)
(680)(234)(334)(228)(106)(13)(98) 
Liabilities incurred in the current year22  18  18  5  
Revisions in estimates of cash flows(c)
285 73 156 161 (5)25 27 3 
Balance at December 31, 2022$12,728 $5,382 $6,181 $5,823 $358 $154 $951 $26 
(a)    Substantially all accretion expense for the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, relates to Duke Energy’s regulated operations and has been deferred in accordance with regulatory accounting treatment.
(b)    Amounts primarily relate to ash impoundment closures and nuclear decommissioning.
(c)    The amounts recorded represent the discounted cash flows for estimated closure costs as evaluated on a site-by-site basis. The increases in 2022 primarily relate to higher unit costs associated with basin closure and routine maintenance. The decreases in 2021 primarily relate to revised basin closure cost estimates, partially offset by increases related to new closure plan approvals, post closure maintenance and beneficiation costs.
169

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
11. PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
The following tables summarize the property, plant and equipment for Duke Energy and its subsidiary registrants.
December 31, 2022
Average
RemainingDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Useful LifeDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)(Years)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Land$2,232 $565 $993 $496 $497 $230 $124 $295 
Plant – Regulated
Electric generation, distribution and transmission39126,016 46,640 55,872 33,336 22,536 6,900 16,604  
Natural gas transmission and distribution5613,174     3,773  9,401 
Other buildings and improvements402,537 973 647 341 306 398 336 183 
Plant – Nonregulated 
Other buildings and improvements10369        
Nuclear fuel3,081 1,723 1,358 1,358     
Equipment132,959 710 936 567 369 441 356 125 
Construction in process7,381 2,671 3,073 1,317 1,756 375 381 478 
Other156,090 1,368 1,943 1,460 476 380 320 387 
Total property, plant and equipment(a)
163,839 54,650 64,822 38,875 25,940 12,497 18,121 10,869 
Total accumulated depreciation – regulated(b)(c)
(50,544)(18,669)(20,584)(14,201)(6,377)(3,250)(6,021)(2,081)
Total accumulated depreciation – nonregulated(d)
(1,556)       
Facilities to be retired, net9       9 
Total net property, plant and equipment$111,748 $35,981 $44,238 $24,674 $19,563 $9,247 $12,100 $8,797 
(a)    Includes finance leases of $816 million, $335 million, $674 million, $590 million, $84 million and $10 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively, primarily within Plant – Regulated. The Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida amounts are net of $233 million, $81 million and $152 million, respectively, of accumulated amortization of finance leases.
(b)    Includes $1,683 million, $934 million, $749 million and $749 million of accumulated amortization of nuclear fuel at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(c)    Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of $7 million, $51 million and $4 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively.
(d)    Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of ($1 million) at Duke Energy.
170

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSPROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
December 31, 2021
Average
RemainingDukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Useful LifeDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)(Years)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Land$2,145 $543 $957 $482 $475 $219 $122 $279 
Plant – Regulated
Electric generation, distribution and transmission40120,855 44,910 53,447 32,417 21,030 6,573 15,925 — 
Natural gas transmission and distribution5412,079 — — — — 3,347 — 8,732 
Other buildings and improvements371,921 550 514 228 286 381 321 155 
Plant – Nonregulated
Other buildings and improvements11401 — — — — — — — 
Nuclear fuel3,181 1,856 1,325 1,325 — — — — 
Equipment132,659 614 791 497 294 403 262 122 
Construction in process5,979 2,078 2,297 954 1,343 515 460 262 
Other145,276 1,323 1,563 1,115 437 287 253 368 
Total property, plant and equipment(a)
154,496 51,874 60,894 37,018 23,865 11,725 17,343 9,918 
Total accumulated depreciation – regulated(b)(c)
(47,611)(17,854)(19,214)(13,387)(5,819)(3,106)(5,583)(1,899)
Total accumulated depreciation – nonregulated(d)
(1,493)— — — — — — — 
Facilities to be retired, net144 102 26 26 — — 11 
Total net property, plant and equipment$105,536 $34,122 $41,706 $23,657 $18,046 $8,625 $11,760 $8,030 
(a)    Includes finance leases of $958 million, $335 million, $729 million, $627 million, $102 million, and $10 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively, primarily within Plant – Regulated. The Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida amounts are net of $178 million, $45 million and $133 million, respectively, of accumulated amortization of finance leases.
(b)    Includes $1,799 million, $1,064 million, $735 million and $735 million of accumulated amortization of nuclear fuel at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(c)    Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of $9 million, $33 million, and $3 million at Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively.
(d)    Includes accumulated amortization of finance leases of ($1 million) at Duke Energy.
Duke Energy continues to execute on its business transformation strategy, including the evaluation of in-office work policies considering the experience with the COVID-19 pandemic and also workforce realignment of roles and responsibilities. In May 2021, Duke Energy management approved the sale of certain properties and entered into an agreement to exit certain leased space on December 31, 2021. The sale of the properties is subject to abandonment accounting and resulted in an impairment charge. Additionally, the exit of the leased space resulted in the impairment of related furniture, fixtures and equipment. During the year ended December 31, 2021, Duke Energy recorded a pretax charge to earnings of $192 million on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which includes $133 million within Impairment of assets and other charges, $42 million within Operations, maintenance and other and $17 million within Depreciation and amortization.
The following table presents capitalized interest, which includes the debt component of AFUDC.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Duke Energy$118 $66 $96 
Duke Energy Carolinas50 29 28 
Progress Energy26 20 17 
Duke Energy Progress19 14 12 
Duke Energy Florida7 
Duke Energy Ohio14 20 26 
Duke Energy Indiana(a)
3 (17)10 
Piedmont4 
(a)    In 2021, Duke Energy Indiana is primarily compromised of ($24 million) of PISCC amortization, which is partially offset by $7 million of the debt component of AFUDC.
171

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
12. GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS
GOODWILL
Duke Energy
Duke Energy's Goodwill balance of $19.3 billion is allocated $17.4 billion to EU&I and $1.9 billion to GU&I on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2022, and 2021. There are no accumulated impairment charges.
Duke Energy Ohio
Duke Energy Ohio's Goodwill balance of $920$920 million,, allocated $596 million to Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I and $324 million to Gas Utilities and Infrastructure,GU&I, is presented net of accumulated impairment charges of $216 million on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018.2021.
Progress Energy
Progress Energy's Goodwill is included in the Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I segment and there are 0no accumulated impairment charges.
Piedmont
Piedmont's Goodwill is included in the Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I segment and there are 0no accumulated impairment charges.
Goodwill Impairment Testing
Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont are required to perform an annual goodwill impairment test as of the same date each year and, accordingly, perform their annual impairment testing of goodwill as of August 31. Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont update their test between annual tests if events or circumstances occur that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. As the fair value for Duke Energy, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Ohio and Piedmont exceeded their respective carrying values at the date of the annual impairment analysis, no goodwill impairment charges were recorded in 2019.

178




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSGOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS


2022.
INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The following tables show the carrying amount and accumulated amortization of intangible assets included in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Duke Energy Registrants at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Emission allowances$18
 $
 $5
 $2
 $3
 $
 $12
 $
Renewable energy certificates172
 53
 118
 118
 
 1
 
 
Natural gas, coal and power contracts24
 
 
 
 
 
 24
 
Renewable operating and development projects89
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total gross carrying amounts305
 53
 123
 120
 3
 1
 36
 
Accumulated amortization – natural gas, coal and power contracts(21) 
 
 
 
 
 (21) 
Accumulated amortization – renewable operating and development projects(34) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated amortization – other(1) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total accumulated amortization(56) 
 
 
 
 
 (21) 
Total intangible assets, net$249

$53

$123

$120

$3

$1

$15
 $
2021.
 December 31, 2018  
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Emission allowances$18
 $
 $5
 $2
 $3
 $
 $12
 $
Renewable energy certificates168
 46
 120
 120
 
 2
 
 
Natural gas, coal and power contracts24
 
 
 
 
 
 24
 
Renewable operating and development projects84
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 3
Total gross carrying amounts300
 46
 125
 122
 3
 2
 36
 3
Accumulated amortization – natural gas, coal and power contracts(20) 
 
 
 
 
 (20) 
Accumulated amortization – renewable operating and development projects(29) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Accumulated amortization – other(5) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (3)
Total accumulated amortization(54) 
 
 
 
 
 (20) (3)
Total intangible assets, net$246

$46

$125

$122

$3

$2

$16
 $

 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Emission allowances$8 $ $5 $2 $3 $ $2 $ 
Renewable energy certificates210 84 124 124  2   
Other55  4 1 3   22 
Total gross carrying amounts273 84 133 127 6 2 2 22 
Accumulated amortization – other(8) (1) (1)  (2)
Total accumulated amortization(8) (1) (1)  (2)
Total intangible assets, net$265 $84 $132 $127 $5 $2 $2 $20 
See Note 11 for information related to 2017 impairment charge.
 December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Emission allowances$$— $$$$— $$— 
Renewable energy certificates204 73 131 131 — — — — 
Natural gas, coal and power contracts24 — — — — — 24 — 
Other28 — — — — — — — 
Total gross carrying amounts264 73 136 133 — 26 — 
Accumulated amortization – natural gas, coal and power contracts(24)— — — — — (24)— 
Accumulated amortization – other(4)— — — — — — — 
Total accumulated amortization(28)— — — — — (24)— 
Total intangible assets, net$236 $73 $136 $133 $$— $$— 
Amortization Expense
Amortization expense amounts for natural gas, coal and power contracts, renewable operating projects and other intangible assets are immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, and are expected to be immaterial for the next five years as of December 31, 2019.2022.
172

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
13. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS
Investments in affiliates that are not controlled by Duke Energy, but over which it has significant influence, are accounted for using the equity method.

179




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES


The following table presents Duke Energy’s investments in unconsolidated affiliates accounted for under the equity method, as well as the respective equity in earnings, by segment.segment, for periods presented in this filing.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
   Equity in
   Equity in
  Equity in
(in millions)Investments
 earnings
 Investments
 earnings
 Investments
earnings
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$122
 $9
 $97
 $6
 $89
$5
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure1,388
 114
 1,003
 27
 763
62
Commercial Renewables314
 (4) 201
 (1) 190
(5)
Other112
 43
 108
 51
 133
57
Total$1,936

$162

$1,409

$83

$1,175
$119

 Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Equity inEquity inEquity in
earningsearningsearnings
(in millions)Investments(losses)Investments(losses)(losses)
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure$99 $7 $104 $$(1)
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure240 21 231 (2,017)
Other116 85 122 47 13 
Total$455 $113 $457 $62 $(2,005)
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, Duke Energy received distributions from equity investments of $55$111 million, $108$56 million and $13$34 million, respectively, which are included in Other assets within Cash Flows from Operating Activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, Duke Energy received distributions from equity investments of $11$6 million, $137$14 million and $281$23 million, respectively, which are included in Return of investment capital within Cash Flows from Investing Activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
During the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, Piedmont received distributions from equity investments of $1$31 million, $1$8 million and $4$2 million, respectively, which are included in Other assets within Cash Flows from Operating ActivitiesActivities. During the years ended December 31, 2021, and $4 million, $32020, Piedmont received distributions from equity investments of $2 million and $2 million, respectively, which are included within Cash Flows from Investing Activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Amounts received during the year ended December 31, 2022, included in Cash Flows from Investing Activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows were immaterial.
Significant investments in affiliates accounted for under the equity method are discussed below.
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Duke Energy owns a 50% interestinterests in both DATC and in Pioneer, which build, own and operate electric transmission facilities in North America.
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
The table below outlines Duke Energy's ownership interests in natural gas pipeline companies and natural gas storage facilities.Pipeline Investments
   Investment Amount (in millions) 
 Ownership December 31, December 31, 
Entity NameInterest 2019 2018 
Pipeline Investments      
ACP47% $1,179
 $797
 
Sabal Trail7.5% 121
 112
(c) 
Constitution24% 
 25
 
Cardinal(a)
21.49% 9
 10
 
Storage Facilities      
Pine Needle(a)
45% 28
 13
 
Hardy Storage(a)
50% 51
 46
 
Total Investments(b)
  $1,388
 $1,003
 

(a)Piedmont owns the Cardinal, Pine Needle and Hardy Storage investments.
(b)Duke Energy includes purchase accounting adjustments related to Piedmont.
(c)Sabal Trail returned capital of $112 million during the year ended December 31, 2018.
In October 2017, Duke Energy entered into a guarantee agreement to support its share of the ACP revolving credit facility. See Note 8 for additional information. As a result of the financing, ACP returned capital of $265 million to Duke Energy.
During 2018 and 2019, ACP received several adverse court rulings as described in Note 4. As a result, Duke Energy evaluated this investment for impairment and determined that fair value approximated carrying value and therefore no impairment was necessary.
For regulatory matters and other information on the ACP, Sabal Trail and Constitution investments, see Notes 4 and 18.
Commercial Renewables
DS Cornerstone, LLC, which owns wind farm projects in the U.S. was part of a sale of minority interest in a certain portion of renewable assets to John Hancock in 2019. See Note 2 for more information on the sale. Prior to the sale, Duke Energy had a 50% interest in DS Cornerstone, LLC. After the sale, Duke Energy has a 26% interest in the investment.
In 2019, Duke Energy acquired a majority ownership in a portfolio of distributed fuel cell projects from Bloom Energy Corporation. Duke Energy is not the primary beneficiary of the assets within the portfolio and does not consolidate the assets in the portfolio.

180




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES


Impairment of Equity Method Investments
Duke Energy recorded OTTIs of the Constitution investment within Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Operations of $25 million and $55 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, respectively. The current year charge resulted in the full write-down of Duke Energy's21.49% investment in Constitution. The impairments were primarily due to the continued delayCardinal, an intrastate pipeline located in resolving project uncertainty through the courts and regulatory bodies, as well as recent pricing concerns between the customers and owners. For additional information on the Constitution investment, see Note 4.
OtherNorth Carolina.
Duke Energy owns a 7.5% interest in Sabal Trail, a 517-mile interstate natural gas pipeline, which provides natural gas to Duke Energy Florida and Florida Power and Light.
Duke Energy owns a 47% interest in the ACP pipeline. In 2020, Duke Energy determined it would no longer continue its investment in the construction of the ACP pipeline. See Notes 4 and 8 for further information.
Storage Facilities
Piedmont owns a 45% interest in Pine Needle, an interstate LNG storage facility located in North Carolina, and a 50% interest in Hardy Storage, an underground interstate natural gas storage facility located in West Virginia.
Renewable Natural Gas Investments
Duke Energy owns a 29.68% investment in SustainRNG, a developer of renewable natural gas projects, a 70% interest in Sustain T&W, SustainRNG's renewable natural gas project located in Georgia, and a 70% interest in Sustain Liberty, SustainRNG's renewable natural gas project located in North Carolina.
Other
Duke Energy has a 17.5% indirect economic ownership interest and a 25% board representation and voting rights interest in NMC, which owns and operates a methanol and MTBE business in Jubail, Saudi Arabia.
173

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Significant Subsidiaries
For the year ended December 31, 2020, Duke Energy's economic ownership interest decreased from 25%investment in ACP met the requirements of S-X Rule 4-08(g) to 17.5% withprovide summarized financial information. The following table provides summary information for ACP as required under S-X Rule 1-02(bb) for the successful startupperiod of NMC's polyacetal production facilitysignificance in 2017. Duke Energy retains 25%Energy's consolidated statements of operations. For the board representationyears ended December 31, 2022, and voting rights of NMC.2021, there were no investments that met the significance requirements.
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Net revenues$— 
Operating loss(4,612)
Net loss(4,512)
Net loss attributable to Duke Energy$(2,121)
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Subsidiary Registrants engage in related party transactions in accordance with the applicable state and federal commission regulations. Refer to the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Subsidiary Registrants for balances due to or due from related parties. Material amounts related to transactions with related parties included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income are presented in the following table.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
Duke Energy Carolinas     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$841
 $985
 $858
Indemnification coverages(b)
20
 22
 23
Joint Dispatch Agreement (JDA) revenue(c)
60
 84
 49
JDA expense(c)
186
 207
 145
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
15
 15
 9
Progress Energy     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$778
 $906
 $736
Indemnification coverages(b)
37
 34
 38
JDA revenue(c)
186
 207
 145
JDA expense(c)
60
 84
 49
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76
 78
 77
Duke Energy Progress     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$462
 $577
 $438
Indemnification coverages(b)
15
 13
 15
JDA revenue(c)
186
 207
 145
JDA expense(c)
60
 84
 49
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76
 78
 77
Duke Energy Florida     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$316
 $329
 $298
Indemnification coverages(b)
22
 21
 23
Duke Energy Ohio     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$354
 $374
 $363
Indemnification coverages(b)
4
 5
 5
Duke Energy Indiana     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$412
 $405
 $370
Indemnification coverages(b)
7
 7
 8
Piedmont     
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$138
 $170
 $50
Indemnification coverages(b)
3
 2
 2
Intercompany natural gas sales(d)
91
 93
 86
Natural gas storage and transportation costs(e)
23
 25
 25


 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Duke Energy Carolinas   
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$838 $894 $753 
Indemnification coverages(b)
28 24 20 
Joint Dispatch Agreement (JDA) revenue(c)
109 41 25 
JDA expense(c)
600 207 114 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
12 11 15 
Progress Energy 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$818 $856 $715 
Indemnification coverages(b)
43 41 36 
JDA revenue(c)
600 207 114 
JDA expense(c)
109 41 25 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76 75 75 
Duke Energy Progress 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$469 $504 $420 
Indemnification coverages(b)
20 19 17 
JDA revenue(c)
600 207 114 
JDA expense(c)
109 41 25 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76 75 75 
Duke Energy Florida 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$349 $352 $295 
Indemnification coverages(b)
23 22 19 
Duke Energy Ohio 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$334 $329 $326 
Indemnification coverages(b)
5 
Duke Energy Indiana 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$447 $409 $401 
Indemnification coverages(b)
8 
Piedmont
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$155 $139 $140 
Indemnification coverages(b)
3 
Intercompany natural gas sales(d)
88 86 90 
Natural gas storage and transportation costs(e)
23 22 23 
181
174




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

(a)The Subsidiary Registrants are charged their proportionate share of corporate governance and other shared services costs, primarily related to human resources, employee benefits, information technology, legal and accounting fees, as well as other third-party costs. These amounts are primarily recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.

(b)The Subsidiary Registrants incur expenses related to certain indemnification coverages through Bison, Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. These expenses are recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(a)The Subsidiary Registrants are charged their proportionate share of corporate governance and other shared services costs, primarily related to human resources, employee benefits, information technology, legal and accounting fees, as well as other third-party costs. These amounts are primarily recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(b)The Subsidiary Registrants incur expenses related to certain indemnification coverages through Bison, Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. These expenses are recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(c)Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress participate in a JDA, which allows the collective dispatch of power plants between the service territories to reduce customer rates. Revenues from the sale of power and expenses from the purchase of power pursuant to the JDA are recorded in Operating Revenues and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(d)Piedmont provides long-term natural gas delivery service to certain Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress natural gas-fired generation facilities. Piedmont records the sales in Operating Revenues, and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress record the related purchases as a component of Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on their respective Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. These intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in consolidation.
(e)Piedmont has related party transactions as a customer of its equity method investments in Pine Needle, Hardy Storage, and Cardinal natural gas storage and transportation facilities. These expenses are included in Cost of natural gas on Piedmont's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(c)Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress participate in a JDA, which allows the collective dispatch of power plants between the service territories to reduce customer rates. Revenues from the sale of power and expenses from the purchase of power pursuant to the JDA are recorded in Operating Revenues and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(d)Piedmont provides long-term natural gas delivery service to certain Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress natural gas-fired generation facilities. Piedmont records the sales in Operating Revenues, and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress record the related purchases as a component of Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on their respective Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. These intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in consolidation.
(e)Piedmont has related party transactions as a customer of its equity method investments in Pine Needle, Hardy Storage, and Cardinal natural gas storage and transportation facilities. These expenses are included in Cost of natural gas on Piedmont's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
In addition to the amounts presented above, the Subsidiary Registrants have other affiliate transactions, including rental of office space, participation in a money pool arrangement, other operational transactions and their proportionate share of certain charged expenses. See Note 7 for more information regarding money pool. These transactions of the Subsidiary Registrants are incurred in the ordinary course of business and are eliminated in consolidation.
As discussed in Note 18, certain trade receivables have been sold by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana to CRC, an affiliate formed by a subsidiary of Duke Energy. The proceeds obtained from the sales of receivables are largely cash but do include a subordinated note from CRC for a portion of the purchase price.
Intercompany Income Taxes
Duke Energy and the Subsidiary Registrants file a consolidated federal income tax return and other state and jurisdictional returns. The Subsidiary Registrants have a tax sharing agreement with Duke Energy for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities and benefits. Income taxes recorded represent amounts the Subsidiary Registrants would incur as separate C-Corporations. The following table includes the balance of intercompany income tax receivables and payables for the Subsidiary Registrants.
Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 DukeDuke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 EnergyProgressEnergy
(in millions)Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
(in millions)CarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
December 31, 2019 
December 31, 2022December 31, 2022
Intercompany income tax receivable$
$125
$28
$
$9
$28
$13
Intercompany income tax receivable$ $95 $36 $17 $ $ $ 
Intercompany income tax payable5


2



Intercompany income tax payable37    17 18 38 
 
December 31, 2018 
December 31, 2021December 31, 2021
Intercompany income tax receivable$52
$47
$29
$
$
$8
$
Intercompany income tax receivable$— $— $— $40 $19 $— $— 
Intercompany income tax payable


16
3

45
Intercompany income tax payable62 — 84 — — 10 27 
15. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
The Duke Energy Registrants use commodity, and interest rate and foreign currency contracts to manage commodity price risk, interest rate risk and interestforeign currency exchange rate risk. The primary use of commodity derivatives is to hedge the generation portfolio against changes in the prices of electricity and natural gas. Piedmont enters into natural gas supply contracts to provide diversification, reliability and natural gas cost benefits to its customers. Interest rate derivatives are used to manage interest rate risk associated with borrowings. Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage risk related to foreign currency exchange rates on certain issuances of debt. Derivatives related to interest rate risk for the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups are included in the following disclosures. See Note 2 for further information.
All derivative instruments not identified as NPNS are recorded at fair value as assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral related to derivative instruments executed under master netting arrangements is offset against the collateralized derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash impacts of settled derivatives are recorded as operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of their issuance or anticipated issuance of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and commercial paper. Interest rate risk is managed by limiting variable-rate exposures to a percentage of total debt and by monitoring changes in interest rates. To manage risk associated with changes in interest rates, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into interest rate swaps, U.S. Treasury lock agreements and other financial contracts. In anticipation of certain fixed-rate debt issuances, a series of forward-starting interest rate swaps or Treasury locks may be executed to lock in components of current market interest rates. These instruments are later terminated prior to or upon the issuance of the corresponding debt.

182175




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING


Cash Flow Hedges
For a derivative designated as hedging the exposure to variable cash flows of a future transaction, referred to as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative's gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings once the future transaction impacts earnings. Amounts for interest rate contracts are reclassified to earnings as interest expense over the term of the related debt. See Note 2 for information on the de-designation of interest rate swaps and related gain reclassified out of AOCI for the year ended December 31, 2022, related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Gains and losses reclassified out of AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182021, and 20172020, were not material. Duke Energy's interest rate derivatives designated as hedges include interest rate swaps used to hedge existing debt within the Commercial Renewables business and forward-starting interest rate swaps not accounted for under regulatory accounting.
Undesignated Contracts
Undesignated contracts primarily include contracts not designated as a hedge because they are accounted for under regulatory accounting or contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting.
Duke Energy’s interest rate swaps for its regulated operations employ regulatory accounting. With regulatory accounting, the mark-to-market gains or losses on the swaps are deferred as regulatory liabilities or regulatory assets, respectively. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment of the related costs in the ratemaking process. The accrual of interest on the swaps is recorded as Interest Expense on the Duke Energy Registrant's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The following tables show notional amounts of outstanding derivatives related to interest rate risk.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
Cash flow hedges$993
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Undesignated contracts1,277
 450
 800
 250
 550
 27
Total notional amount(a)
$2,270
 $450
 $800
 $250
 $550
 $27
December 31, 2018December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndianaOhio
Cash flow hedges(a)
$923
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Cash flow hedgesCash flow hedges$500 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Undesignated contracts1,721
 300
 1,200
 650
 550
 27
Undesignated contracts2,979 1,250 800 500 300 300 27 
Total notional amount$2,644
 $300
 $1,200
 $650
 $550
 $27
Total notional amount$3,479 $1,250 $800 $500 $300 $300 $27 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressIndianaOhio
Cash flow hedges$2,415 $— $— $— $— $— 
Undesignated contracts1,177 350 500 500 300 27 
Total notional amount$3,592 $350 $500 $500 $300 $27 
(a)Duke Energy includes amounts related to consolidated VIEs of $693 million in cash flow hedges as of December 31, 2019, and $422 million in cash flow hedges and $194 million in undesignated contracts as of December 31, 2018.
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to the impact of changes in the prices of electricity purchased and sold in bulk power markets and coal and natural gas purchases, including Piedmont's natural gas supply contracts. Exposure to commodity price risk is influenced by a number of factors including the term of contracts, the liquidity of markets and delivery locations. To manage risk associated with commodity prices, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into long-term power purchase or sales contracts and long-term natural gas supply agreements.
Undesignated Contracts
For the Subsidiary Registrants, bulk power electricity and coal and natural gas purchases flow through fuel adjustment clauses, formula basedformula-based contracts or other cost sharing mechanisms. Differences between the costs included in rates and the incurred costs, including undesignated derivative contracts, are largely deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. Piedmont policies allow for the use of financial instruments to hedge commodity price risks. The strategy and objective of these hedging programs are to use the financial instruments to reduce natural gas cost volatility for customers.

183




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING


Volumes
The tables below include volumes of outstanding commodity derivatives. Amounts disclosed represent the absolute value of notional volumes of commodity contracts excluding NPNS. The Duke Energy Registrants have netted contractual amounts where offsetting purchase and sale contracts exist with identical delivery locations and times of delivery. Where all commodity positions are perfectly offset, no quantities are shown.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
 Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Electricity (GWh)15,858
 
 
 
 
 1,887
 13,971
 
Natural gas (millions of Dth)704
 130
 160
 160
 
 
 3
 411
 December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
 Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Electricity (GWh)15,286
 
 
 
 
 1,786
 13,500
 
Natural gas (millions of Dth)739
 121
 169
 166
 3
 
 1
 448

U.S. EQUITY SECURITIES RISK
In May 2019, Duke Energy Florida entered into a Decommissioning Services Agreement for the accelerated decommissioning of Crystal River Unit 3 with ADP CR3, LLC and ADP SF1, LLC. See Note 4 for additional information on the accelerated decommissioning. Duke Energy Florida executed U.S. equity option collars within the NDTF in May 2019 to preserve the U.S. equity portfolio value in the Duke Energy Florida NDTF in the event the accelerated decommissioning is approved. These option collars were executed as a purchase of a put option and the sale of a call option on certain U.S. equity index funds. The put and call options create a collar to guarantee a minimum and maximum investment value for the Duke Energy Florida NDTF U.S. equity portfolio. The put and call options were entered into at zero-cost, with the price to purchase the puts offset entirely by the funds received to sell the calls. As of December 31, 2019, the aggregate notional amount of both the put and call options was 305,000 units in U.S. equity security index funds. The options are not designated as hedging instruments. Substantially all of Duke Energy Florida’s NDTF qualifies for regulatory accounting. With regulatory accounting, the mark-to-market gains or losses on the options are deferred as regulatory liabilities or regulatory assets, respectively.

December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electricity (GWh)14,086    1,820 12,266  
Natural gas (millions of Dth)909 307 292 292  11 299 
184
176




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electricity (GWh)12,369 — — — 1,681 10,688 — 
Natural gas (millions of Dth)823 264 215 215 — 336 

FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Duke Energy may enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars.
Fair Value Hedges
Derivatives related to existing fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives’ fair value gains or losses and hedged items’ fair value gains or losses are both recorded directly to earnings on the same income statement line item, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates. Duke Energy has elected to exclude the cross-currency basis spread from the assessment of effectiveness in the fair value hedges of its foreign currency risk and record any difference between the change in the fair value of the excluded components and the amounts recognized in earnings as a component of other comprehensive income or loss.
The following table shows Duke Energy's outstanding derivatives related to foreign currency risk. There were no fair value hedges in 2021.
December 31, 2022
ReceiveFair Value
Pay NotionalNotionalReceiveHedge
Gain (Loss)(a)
(in millions)Pay Rate(in millions)RateMaturity Date(in millions)
Fair value hedges
$645 4.75 %600 euros3.10 %June 2028$(3)
537 5.31 %500 euros3.85 %June 2034(2)
Total notional amount$1,182 1,100 euros$(5)
(a)    Amounts are recorded in Other Income and expenses, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, which offsets an equal translation adjustment of the foreign denominated debt. See the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for which the difference between changes in fair value and periodic amortization is recorded.
LOCATION AND FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The following tables show the fair value and balance sheet location of derivative instruments. Although derivatives subject to master netting arrangements are netted on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the fair values presented below are shown gross and cash collateral on the derivatives has not been netted against the fair values shown.
Derivative Assets December 31, 2019
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Commodity Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $17
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $3
 $13
 $1
Noncurrent 1
 
 
 
 
 1
 
 
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts $18
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $4
 $13
 $1
Interest Rate Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current 6
 
 6
 
 6
 
 
 
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts $6

$

$6

$

$6

$

$
 $
Equity Securities Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current 1
 
 1
 
 1
 
 
 
Total Derivative Assets – Equity Securities Contracts $1
 $
 $1
 $
 $1
 $
 $
 $
Total Derivative Assets $25
 $
 $7
 $
 $7
 $4
 $13
 $1
Derivative Liabilities December 31, 2019
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Commodity Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $67
 $33
 $26
 $26
 $
 $
 $1
 $7
Noncurrent 156
 10
 37
 22
 
 
 
 110
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts $223
 $43
 $63
 $48
 $
 $
 $1
 $117
Interest Rate Contracts                
Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $19
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Noncurrent 21
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current 8
 6
 1
 1
 
 1
 
 
Noncurrent 5
 
 
 
 
 5
 
 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts $53
 $6
 $1
 $1
 $
 $6
 $
 $
Equity Securities Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current 24
 
 24
 
 24
 
 
 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Equity Security Contracts $24
 $
 $24
 $
 $24
 $
 $
 $
Total Derivative Liabilities $300
 $49
 $88
 $49
 $24
 $6
 $1
 $117


Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$265 $132 $99 $99 $ $5 $29 $ 
Noncurrent213 104 108 108     
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts$478 $236 $207 $207 $ $5 $29 $ 
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$101 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$228 $94 $41 $23 $17 $ $81 $ 
Noncurrent29        
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts$358 $94 $41 $23 $17 $ $81 $ 
Total Derivative Assets$836 $330 $248 $230 $17 $5 $110 $ 
185
177




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$175 $96 $36 $18 $19 $ $16 $27 
Noncurrent202 31 30 30    141 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts$377 $127 $66 $48 $19 $ $16 $168 
Interest Rate Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Noncurrent2     2   
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts$2 $ $ $ $ $2 $ $ 
Foreign Currency Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$18 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Noncurrent40        
Total Derivative Liabilities – Foreign Currency Contracts$58 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Total Derivative Liabilities$437 $127 $66 $48 $19 $2 $16 $168 

Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$199 $99 $72 $72 $— $$23 $
Noncurrent113 63 50 50 — — — — 
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts$312 $162 $122 $122 $— $$23 $
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Noncurrent— — — — — — — 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$$— $$$— $— $— $— 
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts$$— $$$— $— $— $— 
Total Derivative Assets$320 $162 $124 $124 $— $$23 $
Derivative Assets December 31, 2018
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Commodity Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $35
 $2
 $2
 $2
 $
 $6
 $23
 $3
Noncurrent 4
 1
 2
 2
 
 
 
 
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts $39
 $3
 $4
 $4
 $
 $6
 $23

$3
Interest Rate Contracts                
Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Noncurrent 3
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current 2
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Noncurrent 12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts $18
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Total Derivative Assets $57
 $3
 $4
 $4
 $
 $6
 $23
 $3
178
Derivative Liabilities December 31, 2018
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Commodity Contracts                
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $33
 $14
 $10
 $5
 $6
 $
 $
 $8
Noncurrent 158
 10
 15
 6
 
 
 
 133
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts $191
 $24
 $25
 $11
 $6
 $
 $
 $141
Interest Rate Contracts                
Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current $12
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Noncurrent 6
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments                
Current 23
 9
 13
 11
 2
 1
 
 
Noncurrent 10
 
 6
 5
 1
 4
 
 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts $51
 $9
 $19
 $16
 $3
 $5
 $
 $
Total Derivative Liabilities $242
 $33
 $44
 $27
 $9
 $5
 $
 $141


186




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING


Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$72 $18 $19 $$14 $— $13 $21 
Noncurrent132 — — — 118 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts$204 $27 $24 $10 $14 $— $13 $139 
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$75 $— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Noncurrent21 — — — — — — — 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current10 — — — — — 
Noncurrent18 — — — — 14 — 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts$124 $$— $— $— $$14 $— 
Total Derivative Liabilities$328 $35 $24 $10 $14 $$27 $139 
OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The following tables present the line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheets where derivatives are reported. Substantially all of Duke Energy's outstanding derivative contracts are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements. The gross amounts offset in the tables below show the effect of these netting arrangements on financial position and include collateral posted to offset the net position. The amounts shown are calculated by counterparty. Accounts receivable or accounts payable may also be available to offset exposures in the event of bankruptcy. These amounts are not included in the tables below.
Derivative Assets December 31, 2019  
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Current                
Gross amounts recognized $24
 $
 $7
 $
 $7
 $3
 $13
 $1
Gross amounts offset (1) 
 (1) 
 (1) 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other $23

$

$6

$

$6

$3

$13
 $1
Noncurrent                
Gross amounts recognized $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
 $
 $
Gross amounts offset 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
 $
 $
Derivative Liabilities December 31, 2019  
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Current                
Gross amounts recognized $118
 $39
 $51
 $27
 $24
 $1
 $1
 $7
Gross amounts offset (24) 
 (24) 
 (24) 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other $94
 $39
 $27
 $27
 $
 $1
 $1
 $7
Noncurrent                
Gross amounts recognized $182
 $10
 $37
 $22
 $
 $5
 $
 $110
Gross amounts offset 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other $182
 $10
 $37
 $22
 $
 $5
 $
 $110

Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$594 $226 $140 $122 $17 $5 $110 $ 
Gross amounts offset(64)(33)(30)(30)    
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other$530 $193 $110 $92 $17 $5 $110 $ 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$242 $104 $108 $108 $ $ $ $ 
Gross amounts offset(97)(40)(57)(57)    
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other$145 $64 $51 $51 $ $ $ $ 

Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$193 $96 $36 $18 $19 $ $16 $27 
Gross amounts offset(49)(15)(18)(18)  (16) 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other$144 $81 $18 $ $19 $ $ $27 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$244 $31 $30 $30 $ $2 $ $141 
Gross amounts offset(59)(29)(30)(30)    
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other$185 $2 $ $ $ $2 $ $141 
187
179




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING

Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$204 $99 $74 $74 $— $$23 $
Gross amounts offset(25)(16)(9)(9)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other$179 $83 $65 $65 $— $$23 $
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$116 $63 $50 $50 $— $— $— $— 
Gross amounts offset(23)(15)(8)(8)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other$93 $48 $42 $42 $— $— $— $— 

Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$157 $26 $19 $$14 $$13 $21 
Gross amounts offset(11)(6)(5)(5)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other$146 $20 $14 $— $14 $$13 $21 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$171 $$$$— $$14 $118 
Gross amounts offset(12)(8)(5)(5)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other$159 $$— $— $— $$14 $118 
Derivative Assets December 31, 2018
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Current                
Gross amounts recognized $38
 $2
 $2
 $2
 $
 $6
 $23
 $3
Gross amounts offset (3) (2) (2) (2) 
 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other $35
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $6
 $23
 $3
Noncurrent                
Gross amounts recognized $19
 $1
 $2
 $2
 $
 $
 $
 $
Gross amounts offset (3) (1) (2) (2) 
 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other $16
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Derivative Liabilities December 31, 2018
    Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
  Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Current                
Gross amounts recognized $68
 $23
 $23
 $16
 $8
 $1
 $
 $8
Gross amounts offset (4) (2) (2) (2) 
 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other $64
 $21
 $21
 $14
 $8
 $1
 $
 $8
Noncurrent                
Gross amounts recognized $174
 $10
 $21
 $11
 $1
 $4
 $
 $133
Gross amounts offset (3) (1) (2) (2) 
 
 
 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other $171
 $9
 $19
 $9
 $1
 $4
 $
 $133

OBJECTIVE CREDIT CONTINGENT FEATURES
Certain derivative contracts contain objective credit contingent features. These features include the requirement to post cash collateral or letters of credit if specific events occur, such as a credit rating downgrade below investment grade. The following tables show information with respect to derivative contracts that are in a net liability position and contain objective credit-risk-relatedcredit risk-related payment provisions.
 December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$79
 $35
 $44
 $44
Fair value of collateral already posted
 
 
 
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered79
 35
 44
 44
December 31, 2018December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
DukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$44
 $19
 $25
 $25
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$141 $86 $55 $48 $7 
Fair value of collateral already posted
 
 
 
Fair value of collateral already posted     
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit-risk-related contingent features were triggered44
 19
 25
 25
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggeredAdditional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggered141 86 55 48 7 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$32 $18 $14 $10 $
Fair value of collateral already posted— — — — — 
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggered32 18 14 10 
The Duke Energy Registrants have elected to offset cash collateral and fair values of derivatives. For amounts to be netted, the derivative and cash collateral must be executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement.

180
188




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES


16. INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Duke Energy'sEnergy’s investments in debt and equity securities are primarily comprised of investments held in (i) the NDTF at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, (ii) the grantor trusts at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana related to OPEB plans and (iii) Bison. The Duke Energy Registrants classify investments in debt securities as AFS and investments in equity securities as FV-NI.
For investments in debt securities classified as AFS, the unrealized gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income until realized, at which time they are reported thoughthrough net income. For investments in equity securities classified as FV-NI, both realized and unrealized gains and losses are reported through net income. Substantially all of Duke Energy'sEnergy’s investments in debt and equity securities qualify for regulatory accounting, and accordingly, all associated realized and unrealized gains and losses on these investments are deferred as a regulatory asset or liability.
Duke Energy classifies the majority of investments in debt and equity securities as long term, unless otherwise noted.
Investment Trusts
The investments within the Investment Trusts are managed by independent investment managers with discretion to buy, sell and invest pursuant to the objectives set forth by the investment manager agreements and trust agreements. The Duke Energy Registrants have limited oversight of the day-to-day management of these investments. As a result, the ability to hold investments in unrealized loss positions is outside the control of the Duke Energy Registrants. Accordingly, all unrealized losses associated with debt securities within the Investment Trusts are considered OTTIs and are recognized immediately and deferred to regulatory accounts where appropriate.
Other AFS Securities
Unrealized gains and losses on all other AFS securities are included in other comprehensive income until realized, unless it is determined the carrying value of an investment is other-than-temporarily impaired.has a credit loss. The Duke Energy Registrants analyze all investment holdings each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value should be considered other-than-temporary.is related to a credit loss. If an OTTIa credit loss exists, the unrealized credit loss is included in earnings. There were no material credit losses as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018.2021.
Other Investments amounts are recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
DUKE ENERGY
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Gross
 Gross
   Gross
 Gross
  
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
  
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
(in millions)Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
 Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
NDTF         
  
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $101
 $
 $
 $88
Equity securities3,523
 55
 5,661
 2,402
 95
 4,475
Corporate debt securities37
 1
 603
 4
 13
 566
Municipal bonds13
 
 368
 1
 4
 353
U.S. government bonds33
 1
 1,256
 14
 12
 1,076
Other debt securities3
 
 141
 
 2
 148
Total NDTF Investments$3,609
 $57
 $8,130
 $2,421
 $126
 $6,706
Other Investments 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $52
 $
 $
 $22
Equity securities57
 
 122
 36
 1
 99
Corporate debt securities3
 
 67
 
 2
 60
Municipal bonds4
 
 94
 
 1
 85
U.S. government bonds2
 
 41
 1
 
 45
Other debt securities
 
 56
 
 1
 58
Total Other Investments$66
 $
 $432
 $37
 $5
 $369
Total Investments$3,675
 $57
 $8,562
 $2,458
 $131
 $7,075


December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $215 $— $— $160 
Equity securities3,658 105 5,871 4,905 43 7,350 
Corporate debt securities1 85 641 39 829 
Municipal bonds 39 330 14 314 
U.S. government bonds2 112 1,423 31 12 1,568 
Other debt securities 18 156 180 
Total NDTF Investments$3,661 $359 $8,636 $4,992 $63 $10,401 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $22 $— $— $36 
Equity securities21 16 128 36 — 156 
Corporate debt securities 12 84 119 
Municipal bonds 3 78 80 
U.S. government bonds 2 62 — — 56 
Other debt securities 3 41 — 45 
Total Other Investments$21 $36 $415 $41 $$492 
Total Investments$3,682 $395 $9,051 $5,033 $66 $10,893 
189
181




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES


The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Due in one year or less$372
Due after one through five years550
Due after five through 10 years452
Due after 10 years1,252
Total$2,626

Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, and from sales of AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
FV-NI:   
Realized gains$172
 $168
Realized losses151
 126
AFS:   
Realized gains94
 22
Realized losses67
 51

 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2017
Realized gains$202
Realized losses160

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$201 $724 $366 
Realized losses316 141 174 
AFS:
Realized gains28 56 96 
Realized losses151 54 51 
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Gross
 Gross
   Gross
 Gross
  
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
  
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
(in millions)Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
 Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
NDTF           
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $21
 $
 $
 $29
Equity securities1,914
 8
 3,154
 1,309
 54
 2,484
Corporate debt securities21
 1
 361
 2
 9
 341
Municipal bonds3
 
 96
 
 1
 81
U.S. government bonds16
 1
 578
 5
 8
 475
Other debt securities3
 
 137
 
 2
 143
Total NDTF Investments$1,957
 $10
 $4,347
 $1,316
 $74
 $3,553

The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Due in one year or less$51
Due after one through five years253
Due after five through 10 years181
Due after 10 years687
Total$1,172


190




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES


 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $117 $— $— $53 
Equity securities2,147 51 3,367 2,887 19 4,265 
Corporate debt securities1 62 401 24 506 
Municipal bonds 10 64 — 48 
U.S. government bonds1 51 685 16 712 
Other debt securities 18 148 175 
Total NDTF Investments$2,149 $192 $4,782 $2,932 $27 $5,759 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, and from sales of AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$124 $440 $64 
Realized losses177 96 99 
AFS:
Realized gains22 38 60 
Realized losses86 37 37 
182

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
FV-NI:   
Realized gains$113
 $89
Realized losses107
 73
AFS:   
Realized gains55
 19
Realized losses38
 35
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2017
Realized gains$135
Realized losses103

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
PROGRESS ENERGY
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Gross
 Gross
   Gross
 Gross
  
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
  
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
(in millions)Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
 Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
NDTF           
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $80
 $
 $
 $59
Equity securities1,609
 47
 2,507
 1,093
 41
 1,991
Corporate debt securities16
 
 242
 2
 4
 225
Municipal bonds10
 
 272
 1
 3
 272
U.S. government bonds17
 
 678
 9
 4
 601
Other debt securities
 
 4
 
 
 5
Total NDTF Investments$1,652
 $47
 $3,783
 $1,105
 $52
 $3,153
Other Investments 
  
  
  
  
  
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $49
 $
 $
 $17
Municipal bonds3
 
 51
 
 
 47
Total Other Investments$3
 $
 $100
 $
 $
 $64
Total Investments$1,655
 $47
 $3,883
 $1,105
 $52
 $3,217

The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Due in one year or less$311
Due after one through five years256
Due after five through 10 years211
Due after 10 years469
Total$1,247


191




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES


December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $98 $— $— $107 
Equity securities1,511 54 2,504 2,018 24 3,085 
Corporate debt securities 23 240 15 323 
Municipal bonds 29 266 12 266 
U.S. government bonds1 61 738 15 856 
Other debt securities  8 — — 
Total NDTF Investments$1,512 $167 $3,854 $2,060 $36 $4,642 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $11 $— $— $20 
Municipal bonds  25 — 26 
Total Other Investments$ $ $36 $$— $46 
Total Investments$1,512 $167 $3,890 $2,062 $36 $4,688 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, and from sales of AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
FV-NI:   
Realized gains$59
 $79
Realized losses44
 53
AFS:   
Realized gains36
 3
Realized losses29
 15
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2017
Realized gains$65
Realized losses56

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$77 $284 $302 
Realized losses139 45 75 
AFS:
Realized gains6 16 24 
Realized losses48 14 13 
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Gross
 Gross
   Gross
 Gross
  
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
  
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
(in millions)Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
 Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
NDTF           
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $53
 $
 $
 $46
Equity securities1,258
 21
 2,077
 833
 30
 1,588
Corporate debt securities16
 
 242
 2
 3
 171
Municipal bonds10
 
 272
 1
 3
 271
U.S. government bonds16
 
 403
 6
 3
 415
Other debt securities
 
 4
 
 
 3
Total NDTF Investments$1,300
 $21
 $3,051
 $842
 $39
 $2,494
Other Investments 
  
  
  
   
  
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $2
 $
 $
 $6
Total Other Investments$
 $
 $2
 $
 $
 $6
Total Investments$1,300
 $21
 $3,053
 $842
 $39
 $2,500

The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Due in one year or less$34
Due after one through five years247
Due after five through 10 years204
Due after 10 years436
Total$921


 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $56 $— $— $94 
Equity securities1,431 54 2,411 1,915 23 2,970 
Corporate debt securities 22 230 15 282 
Municipal bonds 29 266 12 266 
U.S. government bonds1 37 460 15 472 
Other debt securities  7 — — 
Total NDTF Investments$1,432 $142 $3,430 $1,957 $29 $4,089 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $9 $— $— $16 
Total Other Investments$ $ $9 $— $— $16 
Total Investments$1,432 $142 $3,439 $1,957 $29 $4,105 
192
183




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES


Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, and from sales of AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
FV-NI:   
Realized gains$38
 $68
Realized losses33
 48
AFS:   
Realized gains7
 2
Realized losses5
 10
 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2017
Realized gains$54
Realized losses48

Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$76 $283 $52 
Realized losses136 44 59 
AFS:
Realized gains6 15 24 
Realized losses44 13 13 
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
Gross
 Gross
   Gross
 Gross
  GrossGrossGrossGross
Unrealized
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
  UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
 Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF            NDTF       
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $27
 $
 $
 $13
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $42 $— $— $13 
Equity securities351
 26
 430
 260
 11
 403
Equity securities80  93 103 115 
Corporate debt securities
 
 
 
 1
 54
Corporate debt securities 1 10 — — 41 
Municipal bonds
 
 
 
 
 1
U.S. government bonds1
 
 275
 3
 1
 186
U.S. government bonds 24 278 — 384 
Other debt securities
 
 
 
 
 2
Other debt securities  1 — — — 
Total NDTF Investments(a)
$352
 $26
 $732
 $263
 $13
 $659
Total NDTF Investments(a)
$80 $25 $424 $103 $$553 
Other Investments 
  
  
  
  
  
Other Investments   
Cash and cash equivalents$
 $
 $4
 $
 $
 $1
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1 $— $— $
Municipal bonds3
 
 51
 
 
 47
Municipal bonds  25 — 26 
Total Other Investments$3
 $
 $55
 $
 $
 $48
Total Other Investments$ $ $26 $$— $29 
Total Investments$355
 $26
 $787
 $263
 $13
 $707
Total Investments$80 $25 $450 $105 $$582 

(a)During the year ended December 31, 2019,
(a)    During the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, Duke Energy Florida continued to receive reimbursements from the NDTF for costs related to ongoing decommissioning activity of the Crystal River Unit 3.
The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Due in one year or less$277
Due after one through five years9
Due after five through 10 years7
Due after 10 years33
Total$326


193




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES


Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, and from sales of AFS securities for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$1 $$250 
Realized losses3 16 
AFS:
Realized gains — 
Realized losses4 — 
184
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
FV-NI:   
Realized gains$21
 $11
Realized losses11
 5
AFS:   
Realized gains29
 1
Realized losses24
 5

 Year Ended December 31,
(in millions)2017
Realized gains$11
Realized losses8
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are measured at FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
 Gross
 Gross
   Gross
 Gross
  
 Unrealized
 Unrealized
   Unrealized
 Unrealized
  
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
 Holding
 Holding
 Estimated
(in millions)Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
 Gains
 Losses
 Fair Value
Investments           
Equity securities$43
 $
 $81
 $29
 $
 $67
Corporate debt securities
 
 6
 
 
 8
Municipal bonds1
 
 36
 
 1
 33
U.S. government bonds
 
 2
 
 
 
Total Investments$44
 $
 $125
 $29
 $1
 $108

The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
(in millions)December 31, 2019
Due in one year or less$4
Due after one through five years16
Due after five through 10 years7
Due after 10 years17
Total$44
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1 $— $— $— 
Equity securities2 16 79 — 97 
Corporate debt securities 1 8 — — 
Municipal bonds 3 45 46 
U.S. government bonds  7 — — 12 
Total Investments$2 $20 $140 $$$161 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2022, 2021 and 2018, and from sales of AFS securities2020, were immaterial.
DEBT SECURITY MATURITIES
The table below summarizes the maturity date for the year ended December 31, 2017, were insignificant.debt securities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndiana
Due in one year or less$137 $7 $89 $24 $65 $8 
Due after one through five years807 287 443 244 199 22 
Due after five through 10 years469 230 193 178 15 6 
Due after 10 years1,402 774 552 517 35 24 
Total$2,815 $1,298 $1,277 $963 $314 $60 
17. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the exchange price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value definition focuses on an exit price versus the acquisition cost. Fair value measurements use market data or assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs may be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. A midmarket pricing convention (the midpoint price between bid and ask prices) is permitted for use as a practical expedient.
Fair value measurements are classified in three levels based on the fair value hierarchy as defined by GAAP. Certain investments are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy. These investments are measured at fair value using the NAVnet asset value per share practical expedient. The net asset value is derived based on the investment cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer.

194




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


Fair value accounting guidance permits entities to elect to measure certain financial instruments that are not required to be accounted for at fair value, such as equity method investments or the company’s own debt, at fair value. The Duke Energy Registrants have not elected to record any of these items at fair value.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed below are as follows.
Investments in equity securities
The majority of investments in equity securities are valued using Level 1 measurements. Investments in equity securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the last business day of the quarter. Principal active markets for equity prices include published exchanges such as the NYSE and Nasdaq Stock Market. Foreign equity prices are translated from their trading currency using the currency exchange rate in effect at the close of the principal active market. There was no after-hours market activity that was required to be reflected in the reported fair value measurements.
Investments in debt securities
Most investments in debt securities are valued using Level 2 measurements because the valuations use interest rate curves and credit spreads applied to the terms of the debt instrument (maturity and coupon interest rate) and consider the counterparty credit rating. If the market for a particular fixed-income security is relatively inactive or illiquid, the measurement is Level 3.
185

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Commodity derivatives
Commodity derivatives with clearinghouses are classified as Level 1. Commodity derivatives with observable forward curves are classified as Level 2. If forward price curves are not observable for the full term of the contract and the unobservable period had more than an insignificant impact on the valuation, the commodity derivative is classified as Level 3. In isolation, increases (decreases) in natural gas forward prices result in favorable (unfavorable) fair value adjustments for natural gas purchase contracts; and increases (decreases) in electricity forward prices result in unfavorable (favorable) fair value adjustments for electricity sales contracts. Duke Energy regularly evaluates and validates pricing inputs used to estimate the fair value of natural gas commodity contracts by a market participant price verification procedure. This procedure provides a comparison of internal forward commodity curves to market participant generated curves.
Interest rate derivatives
Most over-the-counter interest rate contract derivatives are valued using financial models that utilize observable inputs for similar instruments and are classified as Level 2. Inputs include forward interest rate curves, notional amounts, interest rates and credit quality of the counterparties. Derivatives related to interest rate risk for the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups are included in the following disclosures. See Note 2 for further information.
Other fair value considerations
See Note 2 for further information on the valuation of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 12 for a discussion of the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
DUKE ENERGY
The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative amounts in the tables below for all Duke Energy Registrants exclude cash collateral, which is disclosed in Note 15. See Note 16 for additional information related to investments by major security type for the Duke Energy Registrants.
 December 31, 2019
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities$5,684
$5,633
$
$
$51
NDTF debt securities2,469
826
1,643


Other equity securities122
122



Other debt securities310
91
219


Derivative assets25
3
7
15

Total assets8,610
6,675
1,869
15
51
NDTF equity security contracts(23)
(23)

Derivative liabilities(277)(15)(145)(117)
Net assets (liabilities)$8,310
$6,660
$1,701
$(102)$51


 December 31, 2022
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$215 $215 $ $ $ 
NDTF equity securities5,871 5,829   42 
NDTF debt securities2,550 780 1,770   
Other equity securities128 128    
Other debt securities265 55 210   
Other cash and cash equivalents22 22    
Derivative assets836 1 801 34  
Total assets9,887 7,030 2,781 34 42 
Derivative liabilities(437)(16)(421)  
Net assets (liabilities)$9,450 $7,014 $2,360 $34 $42 
 December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$160 $160 $— $— $— 
NDTF equity securities7,350 7,300 — — 50 
NDTF debt securities2,891 967 1,924 — — 
Other equity securities156 156 — — — 
Other debt securities300 45 255 — — 
Other cash and cash equivalents36 36 — — — 
Derivative assets320 293 24 — 
Total assets11,213 8,667 2,472 24 50 
Derivative liabilities(327)(13)(314)— — 
Net assets (liabilities)$10,886 $8,654 $2,158 $24 $50 
195
186




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities$4,475
$4,410
$
$
$65
NDTF debt securities2,231
576
1,655


Other equity securities99
99



Other debt securities270
67
203


Derivative assets57
4
25
28

Total assets7,132
5,156
1,883
28
65
Derivative liabilities(242)(11)(90)(141)
Net assets (liabilities)$6,890
$5,145
$1,793
$(113)$65

The following table provides reconciliations of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
    
(in millions)Derivatives (net)
 Derivatives (net)
Balance at beginning of period$(113) $(114)
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:   
Purchases37
 57
Settlements(44) (57)
Total gains included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet18
 1
Balance at end of period$(102) $(113)

Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$24 $
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases78 21 
Settlements(36)(20)
Total gains (losses) included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(32)15 
Balance at end of period$34 $24 
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities$3,154
$3,103
$
$51
NDTF debt securities1,193
227
966

Total assets4,347
3,330
966
51
Derivative liabilities(49)
(49)
Net assets$4,298
$3,330
$917
$51

 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Not Categorized
NDTF equity securities$2,484
$2,419
$
$65
NDTF debt securities1,069
149
920

Derivative assets3

3

Total assets3,556
2,568
923
65
Derivative liabilities(33)
(33)
Net assets$3,523
$2,568
$890
$65

 December 31, 2022
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$117 $117 $ $ 
NDTF equity securities3,367 3,325  42 
NDTF debt securities1,298 323 975  
Derivative assets330  330  
Total assets5,112 3,765 1,305 42 
Derivative liabilities(127) (127) 
Net assets$4,985 $3,765 $1,178 $42 

196




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


 December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$53 $53 $— $— 
NDTF equity securities4,265 4,215 — 50 
NDTF debt securities1,441 339 1,102 — 
Derivative assets162 — 162 — 
Total assets5,921 4,607 1,264 50 
Derivative liabilities(35)— (35)— 
Net assets$5,886 $4,607 $1,229 $50 
PROGRESS ENERGY
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
 Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalentsNDTF cash and cash equivalents$98 $98 $ $107 $107 $— 
NDTF equity securities$2,530
$2,530
$
 $1,991
$1,991
$
NDTF equity securities2,504 2,504  3,085 3,085 — 
NDTF debt securities1,276
599
677
 1,162
427
735
NDTF debt securities1,252 457 795 1,450 628 822 
Other debt securities100
49
51
 64
17
47
Other debt securities25  25 26 — 26 
Other cash and cash equivalentsOther cash and cash equivalents11 11  20 20 — 
Derivative assets7

7
 4

4
Derivative assets248  248 124 — 124 
Total assets3,913
3,178
735
 3,221
2,435
786
Total assets4,138 3,070 1,068 4,812 3,840 972 
NDTF equity security contracts(23)
(23) 


Derivative liabilities(65)
(65) (44)
(44)Derivative liabilities(66) (66)(24)— (24)
Net assets$3,825
$3,178
$647
 $3,177
$2,435
$742
Net assets$4,072 $3,070 $1,002 $4,788 $3,840 $948 

187

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
 Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
NDTF equity securities$2,077
$2,077
$
 $1,588
$1,588
$
NDTF debt securities974
297
677
 906
294
612
Other debt securities2
2

 6
6

Derivative assets


 4

4
Total assets3,053
2,376
677
 2,504
1,888
616
Derivative liabilities(49)
(49) (27)
(27)
Net assets$3,004
$2,376
$628
 $2,477
$1,888
$589

 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$56 $56 $ $94 $94 $— 
NDTF equity securities2,411 2,411  2,970 2,970 — 
NDTF debt securities963 225 738 1,025 289 736 
Other cash and cash equivalents9 9  16 16 — 
Derivative assets230  230 124 — 124 
Total assets3,669 2,701 968 4,229 3,369 860 
Derivative liabilities(48) (48)(10)— (10)
Net assets$3,621 $2,701 $920 $4,219 $3,369 $850 
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
 Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
NDTF equity securities$453
$453
$
 $403
$403
$
NDTF debt securities302
302

 256
133
123
Other debt securities55
4
51
 48
1
47
Derivative assets7

7
 


Total assets817
759
58
 707
537
170
NDTF equity security contracts(23)
(23) 


Derivative liabilities(1)
(1) (9)
(9)
Net assets$793
$759
$34
 $698
$537
$161

 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$42 $42 $ $13 $13 $— 
NDTF equity securities93 93  115 115 — 
NDTF debt securities289 232 57 425 339 86 
Other debt securities25  25 26 — 26 
Other cash and cash equivalents1 1  — 
Derivative assets17  17 — — — 
Total assets467 368 99 582 470 112 
Derivative liabilities(19) (19)(14)— (14)
Net assets$448 $368 $80 $568 $470 $98 
DUKE ENERGY OHIO
The recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were not material at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018.

197




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


2021.
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
 Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 2
Level 3
Other equity securities$81
$81
$
$
 $67
$67
$
$
Other debt securities44

44

 41

41

Derivative assets13
2

11
 23
1

22
Total assets138
83
44
11
 131
68
41
22
Derivative liabilities(1)(1)

 



Total assets$137
$82
$44
$11
 $131
$68
$41
$22

 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Other equity securities$79 $79 $ $ $97 $97 $— $— 
Other debt securities60  60  64 — 64 — 
Other cash equivalents1 1   — — — — 
Derivative assets110  81 29 23 — 22 
Total assets250 80 141 29 184 98 64 22 
Derivative liabilities(16)(16)  (27)(13)(14)— 
Net assets$234 $64 $141 $29 $157 $85 $50 $22 
188

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
 Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
Balance at beginning of period$22
 $27
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:   
Purchases28
 50
Settlements(36) (53)
Total losses included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(3) (2)
Balance at end of period$11
 $22

 Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$22 $
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases74 18 
Settlements(32)(16)
Total (losses) gains included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(35)14 
Balance at end of period$29 $22 
PIEDMONT
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 3
 Total Fair Value
Level 1
Level 3
Derivative assets$1
$1
$
 $3
$3
$
Derivative liabilities(117)
(117) (141)
(141)
Net (liabilities) assets$(116)$1
$(117) $(138)$3
$(141)

The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
 Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
Balance at beginning of period$(141) $(142)
Total gains and settlements24
 1
Balance at end of period$(117) $(141)


198




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS


 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
Derivative assets$ $ $ $$$— 
Derivative liabilities(168) (168)(139)— (139)
Net (liabilities) assets$(168)$ $(168)$(136)$$(139)
QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
The following tables include quantitative information about the Duke Energy Registrants' derivatives classified as Level 3.
 December 31, 2019 
       Weighted
 Fair Value     Average
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio       
FTRs$4
RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.59
$3.47
$2.07
Duke Energy Indiana       
FTRs11
RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh(0.66)9.24
1.15
Piedmont       
Natural gas contracts(117)Discounted cash flowForward natural gas curves – price per MMBtu1.59
2.46
1.91
Duke Energy       
Total Level 3 derivatives$(102)      
December 31, 2022
December 31, 2018Weighted
Fair Value    Fair ValueAverage
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeInvestment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio     Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs$6
RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$1.19
$4.59
FTRs$5 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.89 $6.25 $3.35 
Duke Energy Indiana     Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs22
RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh(2.07)8.27
FTRs29 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh0.09 21.79 2.74 
Piedmont     
Natural gas contracts(141)Discounted cash flowForward natural gas curves – price per MMBtu1.87
2.95
Duke Energy     Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives$(113)    Total Level 3 derivatives$34 

December 31, 2021
Weighted
Fair ValueAverage
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs$RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.06 $1.79 $0.96 
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs22 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh(1.18)13.11 2.68 
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives$24 
189

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
OTHER FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The fair value and book value of long-term debt, including current maturities, is summarized in the following table. The following disclosures include debt attributable to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details. Estimates determined are not necessarily indicative of amounts that could have been settled in current markets. Fair value of long-term debt uses Level 2 measurements.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Book ValueFair ValueBook ValueFair Value
Duke Energy(a)
$71,215 $63,454 $63,835 $69,683 
Duke Energy Carolinas14,266 12,943 13,275 15,101 
Progress Energy22,439 20,467 20,823 23,751 
Duke Energy Progress11,087 9,689 10,249 11,252 
Duke Energy Florida9,709 8,991 8,482 9,772 
Duke Energy Ohio3,245 2,927 3,193 3,570 
Duke Energy Indiana4,307 3,913 4,323 5,067 
Piedmont3,363 2,940 2,968 3,278 
(a)    Book value of long-term de
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
(in millions)Book Value
 Fair Value
 Book Value
 Fair Value
Duke Energy(a)
$58,126
 $63,062
 $54,529
 $54,534
Duke Energy Carolinas11,900
 13,516
 10,939
 11,471
Progress Energy19,634
 22,291
 18,911
 19,885
Duke Energy Progress9,058
 9,934
 8,204
 8,300
Duke Energy Florida7,987
 9,131
 7,321
 7,742
Duke Energy Ohio2,619
 2,964
 2,165
 2,239
Duke Energy Indiana4,057
 4,800
 3,782
 4,158
Piedmont2,384
 2,642
 2,138
 2,180

bt includes $1.17 billion as of December 31, 2022, and $1.25 billion as of December 31, 2021, of unamortized debt discount and premium, net in purchase accounting adjustments related to the mergers with Progress Energy and Piedmont that are excluded from fair value of long-term debt.
(a)Book value of long-term debt includes $1.5 billion as of December 31, 2019, and $1.6 billion as of December 31, 2018, of unamortized debt discount and premium, net in purchase accounting adjustments related to the mergers with Progress Energy and Piedmont that are excluded from fair value of long-term debt.
At both December 31, 2019,2022, and December 31, 2018,2021, fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and commercial paper, and nonrecourse notes payable of VIEs are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these instruments and/or because the stated rates approximate market rates.

199




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES


18. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
A VIE is an entity that is evaluated for consolidation using more than a simple analysis of voting control. The analysis to determine whether an entity is a VIE considers contracts with an entity, credit support for an entity, the adequacy of the equity investment of an entity and the relationship of voting power to the amount of equity invested in an entity. This analysis is performed either upon the creation of a legal entity or upon the occurrence of an event requiring reevaluation, such as a significant change in an entity’s assets or activities. A qualitative analysis of control determines the party that consolidates a VIE. This assessment is based on (i) what party has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and (ii) what party has rights to receive benefits or is obligated to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The analysis of the party that consolidates a VIE is a continual reassessment.
CONSOLIDATED VIEsPipeline Investments
The obligationsPiedmont owns a 21.49% investment in Cardinal, an intrastate pipeline located in North Carolina.
Duke Energy owns a 7.5% interest in Sabal Trail, a 517-mile interstate natural gas pipeline, which provides natural gas to Duke Energy Florida and Florida Power and Light.
Duke Energy owns a 47% interest in the ACP pipeline. In 2020, Duke Energy determined it would no longer continue its investment in the construction of the consolidated VIEs discussedACP pipeline. See Notes 4 and 8 for further information.
Storage Facilities
Piedmont owns a 45% interest in the following paragraphs are nonrecourse to the Pine Needle, an interstate LNG storage facility located in North Carolina, and a 50% interest in Hardy Storage, an underground interstate natural gas storage facility located in West Virginia.
Renewable Natural Gas Investments
Duke Energy Registrants. The registrants have no requirementowns a 29.68% investment in SustainRNG, a developer of renewable natural gas projects, a 70% interest in Sustain T&W, SustainRNG's renewable natural gas project located in Georgia, and a 70% interest in Sustain Liberty, SustainRNG's renewable natural gas project located in North Carolina.
Other
Duke Energy has a 17.5% indirect economic ownership interest and a 25% board representation and voting rights interest in NMC, which owns and operates a methanol and MTBE business in Jubail, Saudi Arabia.
173

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Significant Subsidiaries
For the year ended December 31, 2020, Duke Energy's investment in ACP met the requirements of S-X Rule 4-08(g) to provide liquidity to, purchase assetssummarized financial information. The following table provides summary information for ACP as required under S-X Rule 1-02(bb) for the period of or guarantee performancesignificance in Duke Energy's consolidated statements of these VIEs unless noted in the following paragraphs.
NaN financial support was provided to any of the consolidated VIEs duringoperations. For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018,2022, and 2017,2021, there were no investments that met the significance requirements.
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Net revenues$— 
Operating loss(4,612)
Net loss(4,512)
Net loss attributable to Duke Energy$(2,121)
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Subsidiary Registrants engage in related party transactions in accordance with the applicable state and federal commission regulations. Refer to the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Subsidiary Registrants for balances due to or due from related parties. Material amounts related to transactions with related parties included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income are presented in the following table.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Duke Energy Carolinas   
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$838 $894 $753 
Indemnification coverages(b)
28 24 20 
Joint Dispatch Agreement (JDA) revenue(c)
109 41 25 
JDA expense(c)
600 207 114 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
12 11 15 
Progress Energy 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$818 $856 $715 
Indemnification coverages(b)
43 41 36 
JDA revenue(c)
600 207 114 
JDA expense(c)
109 41 25 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76 75 75 
Duke Energy Progress 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$469 $504 $420 
Indemnification coverages(b)
20 19 17 
JDA revenue(c)
600 207 114 
JDA expense(c)
109 41 25 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76 75 75 
Duke Energy Florida 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$349 $352 $295 
Indemnification coverages(b)
23 22 19 
Duke Energy Ohio 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$334 $329 $326 
Indemnification coverages(b)
5 
Duke Energy Indiana 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$447 $409 $401 
Indemnification coverages(b)
8 
Piedmont
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$155 $139 $140 
Indemnification coverages(b)
3 
Intercompany natural gas sales(d)
88 86 90 
Natural gas storage and transportation costs(e)
23 22 23 
174

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(a)The Subsidiary Registrants are charged their proportionate share of corporate governance and other shared services costs, primarily related to human resources, employee benefits, information technology, legal and accounting fees, as well as other third-party costs. These amounts are primarily recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(b)The Subsidiary Registrants incur expenses related to certain indemnification coverages through Bison, Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. These expenses are recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(c)Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress participate in a JDA, which allows the collective dispatch of power plants between the service territories to reduce customer rates. Revenues from the sale of power and expenses from the purchase of power pursuant to the JDA are recorded in Operating Revenues and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(d)Piedmont provides long-term natural gas delivery service to certain Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress natural gas-fired generation facilities. Piedmont records the sales in Operating Revenues, and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress record the related purchases as a component of Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on their respective Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. These intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in consolidation.
(e)Piedmont has related party transactions as a customer of its equity method investments in Pine Needle, Hardy Storage, and Cardinal natural gas storage and transportation facilities. These expenses are included in Cost of natural gas on Piedmont's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
In addition to the amounts presented above, the Subsidiary Registrants have other affiliate transactions, including rental of office space, participation in a money pool arrangement, other operational transactions and their proportionate share of certain charged expenses. See Note 7 for more information regarding money pool. These transactions of the Subsidiary Registrants are incurred in the ordinary course of business and are eliminated in consolidation.
As discussed in Note 18, certain trade receivables have been sold by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana to CRC, an affiliate formed by a subsidiary of Duke Energy. The proceeds obtained from the sales of receivables are largely cash but do include a subordinated note from CRC for a portion of the purchase price.
Intercompany Income Taxes
Duke Energy and the Subsidiary Registrants file a consolidated federal income tax return and other state and jurisdictional returns. The Subsidiary Registrants have a tax sharing agreement with Duke Energy for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities and benefits. Income taxes recorded represent amounts the Subsidiary Registrants would incur as separate C-Corporations. The following table includes the balance of intercompany income tax receivables and payables for the Subsidiary Registrants.
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
EnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)CarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
December 31, 2022
Intercompany income tax receivable$ $95 $36 $17 $ $ $ 
Intercompany income tax payable37    17 18 38 
December 31, 2021
Intercompany income tax receivable$— $— $— $40 $19 $— $— 
Intercompany income tax payable62 — 84 — — 10 27 
15. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
The Duke Energy Registrants use commodity, interest rate and foreign currency contracts to manage commodity price risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. The primary use of commodity derivatives is expectedto hedge the generation portfolio against changes in the prices of electricity and natural gas. Piedmont enters into natural gas supply contracts to provide diversification, reliability and natural gas cost benefits to its customers. Interest rate derivatives are used to manage interest rate risk associated with borrowings. Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage risk related to foreign currency exchange rates on certain issuances of debt. Derivatives related to interest rate risk for the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups are included in the following disclosures. See Note 2 for further information.
All derivative instruments not identified as NPNS are recorded at fair value as assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral related to derivative instruments executed under master netting arrangements is offset against the collateralized derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash impacts of settled derivatives are recorded as operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of their issuance or anticipated issuance of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and commercial paper. Interest rate risk is managed by limiting variable-rate exposures to a percentage of total debt and by monitoring changes in interest rates. To manage risk associated with changes in interest rates, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into interest rate swaps, U.S. Treasury lock agreements and other financial contracts. In anticipation of certain fixed-rate debt issuances, a series of forward-starting interest rate swaps or Treasury locks may be executed to lock in components of current market interest rates. These instruments are later terminated prior to or upon the issuance of the corresponding debt.
175

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Cash Flow Hedges
For a derivative designated as hedging the exposure to variable cash flows of a future transaction, referred to as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative's gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings once the future transaction impacts earnings. Amounts for interest rate contracts are reclassified to earnings as interest expense over the term of the related debt. See Note 2 for information on the de-designation of interest rate swaps and related gain reclassified out of AOCI for the year ended December 31, 2022, related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Gains and losses reclassified out of AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, were not material. Duke Energy's interest rate derivatives designated as hedges include forward-starting interest rate swaps not accounted for under regulatory accounting.
Undesignated Contracts
Undesignated contracts primarily include contracts not designated as a hedge because they are accounted for under regulatory accounting or contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting.
Duke Energy’s interest rate swaps for its regulated operations employ regulatory accounting. With regulatory accounting, the mark-to-market gains or losses on the swaps are deferred as regulatory liabilities or regulatory assets, respectively. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment of the related costs in the ratemaking process. The accrual of interest on the swaps is recorded as Interest Expense on the Duke Energy Registrant's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The following tables show notional amounts of outstanding derivatives related to interest rate risk.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndianaOhio
Cash flow hedges$500 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Undesignated contracts2,979 1,250 800 500 300 300 27 
Total notional amount$3,479 $1,250 $800 $500 $300 $300 $27 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressIndianaOhio
Cash flow hedges$2,415 $— $— $— $— $— 
Undesignated contracts1,177 350 500 500 300 27 
Total notional amount$3,592 $350 $500 $500 $300 $27 
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to the impact of changes in the prices of electricity purchased and sold in bulk power markets and natural gas purchases, including Piedmont's natural gas supply contracts. Exposure to commodity price risk is influenced by a number of factors including the term of contracts, the liquidity of markets and delivery locations. To manage risk associated with commodity prices, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into long-term power purchase or sales contracts and long-term natural gas supply agreements.
Undesignated Contracts
For the Subsidiary Registrants, bulk power electricity and natural gas purchases flow through fuel adjustment clauses, formula-based contracts or other cost sharing mechanisms. Differences between the costs included in rates and the incurred costs, including undesignated derivative contracts, are largely deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. Piedmont policies allow for the use of financial instruments to hedge commodity price risks. The strategy and objective of these hedging programs are to use the financial instruments to reduce natural gas cost volatility for customers.
Volumes
The tables below include volumes of outstanding commodity derivatives. Amounts disclosed represent the absolute value of notional volumes of commodity contracts excluding NPNS. The Duke Energy Registrants have netted contractual amounts where offsetting purchase and sale contracts exist with identical delivery locations and times of delivery. Where all commodity positions are perfectly offset, no quantities are shown.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electricity (GWh)14,086    1,820 12,266  
Natural gas (millions of Dth)909 307 292 292  11 299 
176

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electricity (GWh)12,369 — — — 1,681 10,688 — 
Natural gas (millions of Dth)823 264 215 215 — 336 
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Duke Energy may enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars.
Fair Value Hedges
Derivatives related to existing fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives’ fair value gains or losses and hedged items’ fair value gains or losses are both recorded directly to earnings on the same income statement line item, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates. Duke Energy has elected to exclude the cross-currency basis spread from the assessment of effectiveness in the fair value hedges of its foreign currency risk and record any difference between the change in the fair value of the excluded components and the amounts recognized in earnings as a component of other comprehensive income or loss.
The following table shows Duke Energy's outstanding derivatives related to foreign currency risk. There were no fair value hedges in 2021.
December 31, 2022
ReceiveFair Value
Pay NotionalNotionalReceiveHedge
Gain (Loss)(a)
(in millions)Pay Rate(in millions)RateMaturity Date(in millions)
Fair value hedges
$645 4.75 %600 euros3.10 %June 2028$(3)
537 5.31 %500 euros3.85 %June 2034(2)
Total notional amount$1,182 1,100 euros$(5)
(a)    Amounts are recorded in Other Income and expenses, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, which offsets an equal translation adjustment of the foreign denominated debt. See the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for which the difference between changes in fair value and periodic amortization is recorded.
LOCATION AND FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The following tables show the fair value and balance sheet location of derivative instruments. Although derivatives subject to master netting arrangements are netted on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the fair values presented below are shown gross and cash collateral on the derivatives has not been netted against the fair values shown.
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$265 $132 $99 $99 $ $5 $29 $ 
Noncurrent213 104 108 108     
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts$478 $236 $207 $207 $ $5 $29 $ 
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$101 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$228 $94 $41 $23 $17 $ $81 $ 
Noncurrent29        
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts$358 $94 $41 $23 $17 $ $81 $ 
Total Derivative Assets$836 $330 $248 $230 $17 $5 $110 $ 
177

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$175 $96 $36 $18 $19 $ $16 $27 
Noncurrent202 31 30 30    141 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts$377 $127 $66 $48 $19 $ $16 $168 
Interest Rate Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Noncurrent2     2   
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts$2 $ $ $ $ $2 $ $ 
Foreign Currency Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$18 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Noncurrent40        
Total Derivative Liabilities – Foreign Currency Contracts$58 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Total Derivative Liabilities$437 $127 $66 $48 $19 $2 $16 $168 
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$199 $99 $72 $72 $— $$23 $
Noncurrent113 63 50 50 — — — — 
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts$312 $162 $122 $122 $— $$23 $
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Noncurrent— — — — — — — 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$$— $$$— $— $— $— 
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts$$— $$$— $— $— $— 
Total Derivative Assets$320 $162 $124 $124 $— $$23 $
178

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$72 $18 $19 $$14 $— $13 $21 
Noncurrent132 — — — 118 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts$204 $27 $24 $10 $14 $— $13 $139 
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$75 $— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Noncurrent21 — — — — — — — 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current10 — — — — — 
Noncurrent18 — — — — 14 — 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts$124 $$— $— $— $$14 $— 
Total Derivative Liabilities$328 $35 $24 $10 $14 $$27 $139 
OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The following tables present the line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheets where derivatives are reported. Substantially all of Duke Energy's outstanding derivative contracts are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements. The gross amounts offset in the tables below show the effect of these netting arrangements on financial position and include collateral posted to offset the net position. The amounts shown are calculated by counterparty. Accounts receivable or accounts payable may also be available to offset exposures in the event of bankruptcy. These amounts are not included in the tables below.
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$594 $226 $140 $122 $17 $5 $110 $ 
Gross amounts offset(64)(33)(30)(30)    
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other$530 $193 $110 $92 $17 $5 $110 $ 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$242 $104 $108 $108 $ $ $ $ 
Gross amounts offset(97)(40)(57)(57)    
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other$145 $64 $51 $51 $ $ $ $ 
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$193 $96 $36 $18 $19 $ $16 $27 
Gross amounts offset(49)(15)(18)(18)  (16) 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other$144 $81 $18 $ $19 $ $ $27 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$244 $31 $30 $30 $ $2 $ $141 
Gross amounts offset(59)(29)(30)(30)    
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other$185 $2 $ $ $ $2 $ $141 
179

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$204 $99 $74 $74 $— $$23 $
Gross amounts offset(25)(16)(9)(9)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other$179 $83 $65 $65 $— $$23 $
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$116 $63 $50 $50 $— $— $— $— 
Gross amounts offset(23)(15)(8)(8)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other$93 $48 $42 $42 $— $— $— $— 
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$157 $26 $19 $$14 $$13 $21 
Gross amounts offset(11)(6)(5)(5)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other$146 $20 $14 $— $14 $$13 $21 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$171 $$$$— $$14 $118 
Gross amounts offset(12)(8)(5)(5)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other$159 $$— $— $— $$14 $118 
OBJECTIVE CREDIT CONTINGENT FEATURES
Certain derivative contracts contain objective credit contingent features. These features include the requirement to post cash collateral or letters of credit if specific events occur, such as a credit rating downgrade below investment grade. The following tables show information with respect to derivative contracts that are in a net liability position and contain objective credit risk-related payment provisions.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$141 $86 $55 $48 $7 
Fair value of collateral already posted     
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggered141 86 55 48 7 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$32 $18 $14 $10 $
Fair value of collateral already posted— — — — — 
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggered32 18 14 10 
The Duke Energy Registrants have elected to offset cash collateral and fair values of derivatives. For amounts to be providednetted, the derivative and cash collateral must be executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement.
180

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
16. INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Duke Energy’s investments in debt and equity securities are primarily comprised of investments held in (i) the future, that was not previously contractually required.
Receivables Financing – DERF/DEPR/DEFR
DERF, DEPR and DEFR are bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiaries ofNDTF at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively. DERF, DEPR(ii) the grantor trusts at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and DEFRDuke Energy Indiana related to OPEB plans and (iii) Bison. The Duke Energy Registrants classify investments in debt securities as AFS and investments in equity securities as FV-NI.
For investments in debt securities classified as AFS, the unrealized gains and losses are wholly owned LLCsincluded in other comprehensive income until realized, at which time they are reported through net income. For investments in equity securities classified as FV-NI, both realized and unrealized gains and losses are reported through net income. Substantially all of Duke Energy’s investments in debt and equity securities qualify for regulatory accounting, and accordingly, all associated realized and unrealized gains and losses on these investments are deferred as a regulatory asset or liability.
Duke Energy classifies the majority of investments in debt and equity securities as long term, unless otherwise noted.
Investment Trusts
The investments within the Investment Trusts are managed by independent investment managers with separate legal existencediscretion to buy, sell and invest pursuant to the objectives set forth by the investment manager agreements and trust agreements. The Duke Energy Registrants have limited oversight of the day-to-day management of these investments. As a result, the ability to hold investments in unrealized loss positions is outside the control of the Duke Energy Registrants. Accordingly, all unrealized losses associated with debt securities within the Investment Trusts are recognized immediately and deferred to regulatory accounts where appropriate.
Other AFS Securities
Unrealized gains and losses on all other AFS securities are included in other comprehensive income until realized, unless it is determined the carrying value of an investment has a credit loss. The Duke Energy Registrants analyze all investment holdings each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value is related to a credit loss. If a credit loss exists, the unrealized credit loss is included in earnings. There were no material credit losses as of December 31, 2022, and 2021.
Other Investments amounts are recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
DUKE ENERGY
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $215 $— $— $160 
Equity securities3,658 105 5,871 4,905 43 7,350 
Corporate debt securities1 85 641 39 829 
Municipal bonds 39 330 14 314 
U.S. government bonds2 112 1,423 31 12 1,568 
Other debt securities 18 156 180 
Total NDTF Investments$3,661 $359 $8,636 $4,992 $63 $10,401 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $22 $— $— $36 
Equity securities21 16 128 36 — 156 
Corporate debt securities 12 84 119 
Municipal bonds 3 78 80 
U.S. government bonds 2 62 — — 56 
Other debt securities 3 41 — 45 
Total Other Investments$21 $36 $415 $41 $$492 
Total Investments$3,682 $395 $9,051 $5,033 $66 $10,893 
181

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$201 $724 $366 
Realized losses316 141 174 
AFS:
Realized gains28 56 96 
Realized losses151 54 51 
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $117 $— $— $53 
Equity securities2,147 51 3,367 2,887 19 4,265 
Corporate debt securities1 62 401 24 506 
Municipal bonds 10 64 — 48 
U.S. government bonds1 51 685 16 712 
Other debt securities 18 148 175 
Total NDTF Investments$2,149 $192 $4,782 $2,932 $27 $5,759 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$124 $440 $64 
Realized losses177 96 99 
AFS:
Realized gains22 38 60 
Realized losses86 37 37 
182

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
PROGRESS ENERGY
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $98 $— $— $107 
Equity securities1,511 54 2,504 2,018 24 3,085 
Corporate debt securities 23 240 15 323 
Municipal bonds 29 266 12 266 
U.S. government bonds1 61 738 15 856 
Other debt securities  8 — — 
Total NDTF Investments$1,512 $167 $3,854 $2,060 $36 $4,642 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $11 $— $— $20 
Municipal bonds  25 — 26 
Total Other Investments$ $ $36 $$— $46 
Total Investments$1,512 $167 $3,890 $2,062 $36 $4,688 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$77 $284 $302 
Realized losses139 45 75 
AFS:
Realized gains6 16 24 
Realized losses48 14 13 
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $56 $— $— $94 
Equity securities1,431 54 2,411 1,915 23 2,970 
Corporate debt securities 22 230 15 282 
Municipal bonds 29 266 12 266 
U.S. government bonds1 37 460 15 472 
Other debt securities  7 — — 
Total NDTF Investments$1,432 $142 $3,430 $1,957 $29 $4,089 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $9 $— $— $16 
Total Other Investments$ $ $9 $— $— $16 
Total Investments$1,432 $142 $3,439 $1,957 $29 $4,105 
183

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$76 $283 $52 
Realized losses136 44 59 
AFS:
Realized gains6 15 24 
Realized losses44 13 13 
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF       
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $42 $— $— $13 
Equity securities80  93 103 115 
Corporate debt securities 1 10 — — 41 
U.S. government bonds 24 278 — 384 
Other debt securities  1 — — — 
Total NDTF Investments(a)
$80 $25 $424 $103 $$553 
Other Investments   
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1 $— $— $
Municipal bonds  25 — 26 
Total Other Investments$ $ $26 $$— $29 
Total Investments$80 $25 $450 $105 $$582 
(a)    During the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, Duke Energy Florida continued to receive reimbursements from the NDTF for costs related to ongoing decommissioning activity of the Crystal River Unit 3.
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$1 $$250 
Realized losses3 16 
AFS:
Realized gains — 
Realized losses4 — 
184

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are measured at FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1 $— $— $— 
Equity securities2 16 79 — 97 
Corporate debt securities 1 8 — — 
Municipal bonds 3 45 46 
U.S. government bonds  7 — — 12 
Total Investments$2 $20 $140 $$$161 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were immaterial.
DEBT SECURITY MATURITIES
The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndiana
Due in one year or less$137 $7 $89 $24 $65 $8 
Due after one through five years807 287 443 244 199 22 
Due after five through 10 years469 230 193 178 15 6 
Due after 10 years1,402 774 552 517 35 24 
Total$2,815 $1,298 $1,277 $963 $314 $60 
17. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the exchange price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value definition focuses on an exit price versus the acquisition cost. Fair value measurements use market data or assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs may be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. A midmarket pricing convention (the midpoint price between bid and ask prices) is permitted for use as a practical expedient.
Fair value measurements are classified in three levels based on the fair value hierarchy as defined by GAAP. Certain investments are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy. These investments are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The net asset value is derived based on the investment cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer.
Fair value accounting guidance permits entities to elect to measure certain financial instruments that are not required to be accounted for at fair value, such as equity method investments or the company’s own debt, at fair value. The Duke Energy Registrants have not elected to record any of these items at fair value.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed below are as follows.
Investments in equity securities
The majority of investments in equity securities are valued using Level 1 measurements. Investments in equity securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the last business day of the quarter. Principal active markets for equity prices include published exchanges such as the NYSE and Nasdaq Stock Market. Foreign equity prices are translated from their parent companies,trading currency using the currency exchange rate in effect at the close of the principal active market. There was no after-hours market activity that was required to be reflected in the reported fair value measurements.
Investments in debt securities
Most investments in debt securities are valued using Level 2 measurements because the valuations use interest rate curves and their assetscredit spreads applied to the terms of the debt instrument (maturity and coupon interest rate) and consider the counterparty credit rating. If the market for a particular fixed-income security is relatively inactive or illiquid, the measurement is Level 3.
185

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Commodity derivatives
Commodity derivatives with clearinghouses are classified as Level 1. Commodity derivatives with observable forward curves are classified as Level 2. If forward price curves are not generally availableobservable for the full term of the contract and the unobservable period had more than an insignificant impact on the valuation, the commodity derivative is classified as Level 3. In isolation, increases (decreases) in natural gas forward prices result in favorable (unfavorable) fair value adjustments for natural gas purchase contracts; and increases (decreases) in electricity forward prices result in unfavorable (favorable) fair value adjustments for electricity sales contracts. Duke Energy regularly evaluates and validates pricing inputs used to creditorsestimate the fair value of their parent companies. Onnatural gas commodity contracts by a revolvingmarket participant price verification procedure. This procedure provides a comparison of internal forward commodity curves to market participant generated curves.
Interest rate derivatives
Most over-the-counter interest rate contract derivatives are valued using financial models that utilize observable inputs for similar instruments and are classified as Level 2. Inputs include forward interest rate curves, notional amounts, interest rates and credit quality of the counterparties. Derivatives related to interest rate risk for the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups are included in the following disclosures. See Note 2 for further information.
Other fair value considerations
See Note 2 for further information on the valuation of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 12 for a discussion of the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
DUKE ENERGY
The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis DERF, DEPRon the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative amounts in the tables below for all Duke Energy Registrants exclude cash collateral, which is disclosed in Note 15. See Note 16 for additional information related to investments by major security type for the Duke Energy Registrants.
 December 31, 2022
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$215 $215 $ $ $ 
NDTF equity securities5,871 5,829   42 
NDTF debt securities2,550 780 1,770   
Other equity securities128 128    
Other debt securities265 55 210   
Other cash and cash equivalents22 22    
Derivative assets836 1 801 34  
Total assets9,887 7,030 2,781 34 42 
Derivative liabilities(437)(16)(421)  
Net assets (liabilities)$9,450 $7,014 $2,360 $34 $42 
 December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$160 $160 $— $— $— 
NDTF equity securities7,350 7,300 — — 50 
NDTF debt securities2,891 967 1,924 — — 
Other equity securities156 156 — — — 
Other debt securities300 45 255 — — 
Other cash and cash equivalents36 36 — — — 
Derivative assets320 293 24 — 
Total assets11,213 8,667 2,472 24 50 
Derivative liabilities(327)(13)(314)— — 
Net assets (liabilities)$10,886 $8,654 $2,158 $24 $50 
186

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table provides reconciliations of beginning and DEFR buy certain accounts receivable arising fromending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$24 $
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases78 21 
Settlements(36)(20)
Total gains (losses) included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(32)15 
Balance at end of period$34 $24 
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the sale of electricityConsolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$117 $117 $ $ 
NDTF equity securities3,367 3,325  42 
NDTF debt securities1,298 323 975  
Derivative assets330  330  
Total assets5,112 3,765 1,305 42 
Derivative liabilities(127) (127) 
Net assets$4,985 $3,765 $1,178 $42 
 December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$53 $53 $— $— 
NDTF equity securities4,265 4,215 — 50 
NDTF debt securities1,441 339 1,102 — 
Derivative assets162 — 162 — 
Total assets5,921 4,607 1,264 50 
Derivative liabilities(35)— (35)— 
Net assets$5,886 $4,607 $1,229 $50 
PROGRESS ENERGY
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and related services from their parent companies.liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
DERF, DEPR
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$98 $98 $ $107 $107 $— 
NDTF equity securities2,504 2,504  3,085 3,085 — 
NDTF debt securities1,252 457 795 1,450 628 822 
Other debt securities25  25 26 — 26 
Other cash and cash equivalents11 11  20 20 — 
Derivative assets248  248 124 — 124 
Total assets4,138 3,070 1,068 4,812 3,840 972 
Derivative liabilities(66) (66)(24)— (24)
Net assets$4,072 $3,070 $1,002 $4,788 $3,840 $948 
187

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and DEFR borrow amounts under credit facilities to buy these receivables. Borrowing availability fromliabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the credit facilities is limited toConsolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$56 $56 $ $94 $94 $— 
NDTF equity securities2,411 2,411  2,970 2,970 — 
NDTF debt securities963 225 738 1,025 289 736 
Other cash and cash equivalents9 9  16 16 — 
Derivative assets230  230 124 — 124 
Total assets3,669 2,701 968 4,229 3,369 860 
Derivative liabilities(48) (48)(10)— (10)
Net assets$3,621 $2,701 $920 $4,219 $3,369 $850 
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the amount of qualified receivables purchased. Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$42 $42 $ $13 $13 $— 
NDTF equity securities93 93  115 115 — 
NDTF debt securities289 232 57 425 339 86 
Other debt securities25  25 26 — 26 
Other cash and cash equivalents1 1  — 
Derivative assets17  17 — — — 
Total assets467 368 99 582 470 112 
Derivative liabilities(19) (19)(14)— (14)
Net assets$448 $368 $80 $568 $470 $98 
DUKE ENERGY OHIO
The sole source of funds to satisfy the related debt obligations is cash collections from the receivables. Amounts borrowed under the credit facilities are reflectedrecorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt.were not material at December 31, 2022, and 2021.
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
The most significant activity that impactsfollowing table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the economic performanceConsolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Other equity securities$79 $79 $ $ $97 $97 $— $— 
Other debt securities60  60  64 — 64 — 
Other cash equivalents1 1   — — — — 
Derivative assets110  81 29 23 — 22 
Total assets250 80 141 29 184 98 64 22 
Derivative liabilities(16)(16)  (27)(13)(14)— 
Net assets$234 $64 $141 $29 $157 $85 $50 $22 
188

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table provides a reconciliation of DERF, DEPRbeginning and DEFR areending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
 Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$22 $
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases74 18 
Settlements(32)(16)
Total (losses) gains included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(35)14 
Balance at end of period$29 $22 
PIEDMONT
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the decisions made to manage delinquent receivables.Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
Derivative assets$ $ $ $$$— 
Derivative liabilities(168) (168)(139)— (139)
Net (liabilities) assets$(168)$ $(168)$(136)$$(139)
QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
The following tables include quantitative information about the Duke Energy Carolinas, DukeRegistrants' derivatives classified as Level 3.
December 31, 2022
Weighted
Fair ValueAverage
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs$5 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.89 $6.25 $3.35 
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs29 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh0.09 21.79 2.74 
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives$34 
December 31, 2021
Weighted
Fair ValueAverage
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs$RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.06 $1.79 $0.96 
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs22 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh(1.18)13.11 2.68 
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives$24 
189

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
OTHER FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The fair value and book value of long-term debt, including current maturities, is summarized in the following table. The following disclosures include debt attributable to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details. Estimates determined are not necessarily indicative of amounts that could have been settled in current markets. Fair value of long-term debt uses Level 2 measurements.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Book ValueFair ValueBook ValueFair Value
Duke Energy(a)
$71,215 $63,454 $63,835 $69,683 
Duke Energy Carolinas14,266 12,943 13,275 15,101 
Progress Energy22,439 20,467 20,823 23,751 
Duke Energy Progress11,087 9,689 10,249 11,252 
Duke Energy Florida9,709 8,991 8,482 9,772 
Duke Energy Ohio3,245 2,927 3,193 3,570 
Duke Energy Indiana4,307 3,913 4,323 5,067 
Piedmont3,363 2,940 2,968 3,278 
(a)    Book value of long-term debt includes $1.17 billion as of December 31, 2022, and $1.25 billion as of December 31, 2021, of unamortized debt discount and premium, net in purchase accounting adjustments related to the mergers with Progress Energy Progress and Duke Energy FloridaPiedmont that are consideredexcluded from fair value of long-term debt.
At both December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and commercial paper, and nonrecourse notes payable of VIEs are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the primary beneficiaries and consolidate DERF, DEPR and DEFR, respectively, as they make those decisions.short-term nature of these instruments and/or because the stated rates approximate market rates.
Receivables Financing – CRC
CRC18. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
A VIE is an entity that is evaluated for consolidation using more than a simple analysis of voting control. The analysis to determine whether an entity is a bankruptcy remote, special purposeVIE considers contracts with an entity, indirectly owned by Duke Energy. On a revolving basis, CRC buys certain accounts receivable arising fromcredit support for an entity, the saleadequacy of electricity, natural gasthe equity investment of an entity and related services from Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. CRC borrows amounts under a credit facility to buy the receivables from Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. Borrowing availability from the credit facility is limitedrelationship of voting power to the amount of qualified receivables sold to CRC. The sole source of funds to satisfyequity invested in an entity. This analysis is performed either upon the related debt obligation is cash collections from the receivables. Amounts borrowed under the credit facility are reflected on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt.
The proceeds Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana receive from the sale of receivables to CRC are approximately 75% cash and 25% in the formcreation of a subordinated note from CRC. The subordinated notelegal entity or upon the occurrence of an event requiring reevaluation, such as a significant change in an entity’s assets or activities. A qualitative analysis of control determines the party that consolidates a VIE. This assessment is a retained interest in the receivables sold. Dependingbased on collection experience, additional equity infusions to CRC may be required by Duke Energy to maintain a minimum equity balance of $3 million.
CRC is considered a VIE because (i) equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations, (ii) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity is not held by the equity holder and (iii) deficiencies in net worth of CRC are funded by Duke Energy. The most significant activities that impact the economic performance of CRC are decisions made to manage delinquent receivables. Duke Energy is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates CRC as it makes these decisions. Neither Duke Energy Ohio nor Duke Energy Indiana consolidate CRC.
Receivables Financing – Credit Facilities
The following table summarizes the amounts and expiration dates of the credit facilities and associated restricted receivables described above.
 Duke Energy
   Duke Energy
 Duke Energy
 Duke Energy
   Carolinas
 Progress
 Florida
(in millions)CRC
 DERF
 DEPR
 DEFR
Expiration dateFebruary 2023
 December 2022
 February 2021
 April 2021
Credit facility amount$350
 $475
 $325
 $250
Amounts borrowed at December 31, 2019350
 474
 325
 250
Amounts borrowed at December 31, 2018325
 450
 300
 225
Restricted Receivables at December 31, 2019522
 642
 489
 336
Restricted Receivables at December 31, 2018564
 699
 547
 357


200




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES


Nuclear Asset-Recovery Bonds – Duke Energy Florida Project Finance, LLC (DEFPF)
DEFPF is a bankruptcy remote, wholly owned special purpose subsidiary of Duke Energy Florida. DEFPF was formed in 2016 for the sole purpose of issuing nuclear asset-recovery bonds to finance Duke Energy Florida's unrecovered regulatory asset related to Crystal River Unit 3.
In 2016, DEFPF issued senior secured bonds and used the proceeds to acquire nuclear asset-recovery property from Duke Energy Florida. The nuclear asset-recovery property acquired includes the right to impose, bill, collect and adjust a non-bypassable nuclear asset-recovery charge from all Duke Energy Florida retail customers until the bonds are paid in full and all financing costs have been recovered. The nuclear asset-recovery bonds are secured by the nuclear asset-recovery property and cash collections from the nuclear asset-recovery charges are the sole source of funds to satisfy the debt obligation. The bondholders have no recourse to Duke Energy Florida.
DEFPF is considered a VIE primarily because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations. Duke Energy Floridawhat party has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE as described above and therefore Duke Energy Florida is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates DEFPF.
The following table summarizes the impact of DEFPF on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
2018
Receivables of VIEs$5
$5
Regulatory Assets: Current52
52
Current Assets: Other39
39
Other Noncurrent Assets: Regulatory assets989
1,041
Current Liabilities: Other10
10
Current maturities of long-term debt54
53
Long-Term Debt1,057
1,111

Commercial Renewables
Certain of Duke Energy’s renewable energy facilities are VIEs due to Duke Energy issuing guarantees for debt service and operations and maintenance reserves in support of debt financings. Assets are restricted and cannot be pledged as collateral or sold to third parties without prior approval of debt holders. Additionally, Duke Energy has VIEs associated with tax equity arrangements entered into with third-party investors in order to finance the cost of renewable assets eligible for tax credits. The activities that most significantly impacted theimpact its economic performance of these renewable energy facilities were decisions associated with siting, negotiating PPAs and EPC agreements, and decisions associated with ongoing operations and maintenance-related activities. Duke Energy(ii) what party has rights to receive benefits or is consideredobligated to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the primary beneficiary and consolidates the entities as it is responsible for all of these decisions.
VIE. The table below presents material balances reported on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets related to Commercial Renewables VIEs.
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
2018
Current Assets: Other$203
$123
Property, Plant and Equipment: Cost5,747
4,007
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(1,041)(698)
Other Noncurrent Assets: Other106
261
Current maturities of long-term debt162
174
Long-Term Debt1,541
1,587
Other Noncurrent Liabilities: AROs127
106
Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other228
212


201




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES


NON-CONSOLIDATED VIEs
The following tables summarize the impact of non-consolidated VIEs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2019
 Duke Energy Duke
 Duke
 Pipeline
 Commercial
 Other
   Energy
 Energy
(in millions)Investments
 Renewables
 
VIEs(a)

 Total
 Ohio
 Indiana
Receivables from affiliated companies$
 $(1) $
 $(1) $64
 $77
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates1,179
 300
 
 1,479
 
 
Total assets$1,179
 $299
 $
 $1,478
 $64
 $77
Taxes accrued(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Other current liabilities
 
 4
 4
 
 
Deferred income taxes59
 
 
 59
 
 
Other noncurrent liabilities
 
 11
 11
 
 
Total liabilities$58
 $
 $15
 $73
 $
 $
Net assets (liabilities)$1,121
 $299
 $(15) $1,405
 $64
 $77

(a)Duke Energy holds a 50% equity interest in Pioneer. As of December 31, 2018, Pioneer was considered a VIE due to having insufficient equity to finance its own activities without subordinated financial support. In October 2019, Pioneer closed on a private placement debt offering that gave Pioneer sufficient equity to finance its own activities and, therefore, is no longer considered a VIE. Duke Energy's investment in Pioneer was $57 million at December 31, 2019.
 December 31, 2018
 Duke Energy Duke
 Duke
 Pipeline
 Commercial
 Other
   Energy
 Energy
(in millions)Investments
 Renewables
 VIEs
 Total
 Ohio
 Indiana
Receivables from affiliated companies$
 $
 $
 $
 $93
 $118
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates822
 190
 48
 1,060
 
 
Total assets$822
 $190
 $48
 $1,060
 $93
 $118
Taxes accrued(1) 
 
 (1) 
 
Other current liabilities
 
 4
 4
 
 
Deferred income taxes21
 
 
 21
 
 
Other noncurrent liabilities
 
 12
 12
 
 
Total liabilities$20
 $
 $16
 $36
 $
 $
Net assets$802
 $190
 $32
 $1,024
 $93
 $118

The Duke Energy Registrants are not aware of any situations where the maximum exposure to loss significantly exceeds the carrying values shown above except for the PPA with OVEC, which is discussed below, and various guarantees, including Duke Energy's guarantee agreement to support its shareanalysis of the ACP revolving credit facility. Duke Energy's maximum exposure to loss under the terms of the guaranteeparty that consolidates a VIE is $827 million, which represents 47% of the outstanding borrowings under the credit facility as of December 31, 2019. For more information on various guarantees, refer to Note 8.a continual reassessment.
Pipeline Investments
Piedmont owns a 21.49% investment in Cardinal, an intrastate pipeline located in North Carolina.
Duke Energy owns a 7.5% interest in Sabal Trail, a 517-mile interstate natural gas pipeline, which provides natural gas to Duke Energy Florida and Florida Power and Light.
Duke Energy owns a 47% interest in the ACP pipeline. In 2020, Duke Energy determined it would no longer continue its investment in the construction of the ACP pipeline. See Notes 4 and 8 for further information.
Storage Facilities
Piedmont owns a 45% interest in Pine Needle, an interstate LNG storage facility located in North Carolina, and a 50% interest in Hardy Storage, an underground interstate natural gas storage facility located in West Virginia.
Renewable Natural Gas Investments
Duke Energy owns a 29.68% investment in SustainRNG, a developer of renewable natural gas projects, a 70% interest in Sustain T&W, SustainRNG's renewable natural gas project located in Georgia, and a 70% interest in Sustain Liberty, SustainRNG's renewable natural gas project located in North Carolina.
Other
Duke Energy has a 17.5% indirect economic ownership interest and a 25% board representation and voting rights interest in NMC, which owns and operates a methanol and MTBE business in Jubail, Saudi Arabia.
173

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES
Significant Subsidiaries
For the year ended December 31, 2020, Duke Energy's investment in ACP met the requirements of S-X Rule 4-08(g) to provide summarized financial information. The following table provides summary information for ACP as required under S-X Rule 1-02(bb) for the period of significance in Duke Energy's consolidated statements of operations. For the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, there were no investments that met the significance requirements.
Year Ended
December 31, 2020
Net revenues$— 
Operating loss(4,612)
Net loss(4,512)
Net loss attributable to Duke Energy$(2,121)
14. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
The Subsidiary Registrants engage in related party transactions in accordance with the applicable state and federal commission regulations. Refer to the Consolidated Balance Sheets of the Subsidiary Registrants for balances due to or due from related parties. Material amounts related to transactions with related parties included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income are presented in the following table.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Duke Energy Carolinas   
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$838 $894 $753 
Indemnification coverages(b)
28 24 20 
Joint Dispatch Agreement (JDA) revenue(c)
109 41 25 
JDA expense(c)
600 207 114 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
12 11 15 
Progress Energy 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$818 $856 $715 
Indemnification coverages(b)
43 41 36 
JDA revenue(c)
600 207 114 
JDA expense(c)
109 41 25 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76 75 75 
Duke Energy Progress 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$469 $504 $420 
Indemnification coverages(b)
20 19 17 
JDA revenue(c)
600 207 114 
JDA expense(c)
109 41 25 
Intercompany natural gas purchases(d)
76 75 75 
Duke Energy Florida 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$349 $352 $295 
Indemnification coverages(b)
23 22 19 
Duke Energy Ohio 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$334 $329 $326 
Indemnification coverages(b)
5 
Duke Energy Indiana 
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$447 $409 $401 
Indemnification coverages(b)
8 
Piedmont
Corporate governance and shared service expenses(a)
$155 $139 $140 
Indemnification coverages(b)
3 
Intercompany natural gas sales(d)
88 86 90 
Natural gas storage and transportation costs(e)
23 22 23 
174

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSRELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
(a)The Subsidiary Registrants are charged their proportionate share of corporate governance and other shared services costs, primarily related to human resources, employee benefits, information technology, legal and accounting fees, as well as other third-party costs. These amounts are primarily recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(b)The Subsidiary Registrants incur expenses related to certain indemnification coverages through Bison, Duke Energy’s wholly owned captive insurance subsidiary. These expenses are recorded in Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(c)Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress participate in a JDA, which allows the collective dispatch of power plants between the service territories to reduce customer rates. Revenues from the sale of power and expenses from the purchase of power pursuant to the JDA are recorded in Operating Revenues and Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power, respectively, on the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
(d)Piedmont provides long-term natural gas delivery service to certain Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress natural gas-fired generation facilities. Piedmont records the sales in Operating Revenues, and Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress record the related purchases as a component of Fuel used in electric generation and purchased power on their respective Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. These intercompany revenues and expenses are eliminated in consolidation.
(e)Piedmont has related party transactions as a customer of its equity method investments in Pine Needle, Hardy Storage, and Cardinal natural gas storage and transportation facilities. These expenses are included in Cost of natural gas on Piedmont's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
In addition to the amounts presented above, the Subsidiary Registrants have other affiliate transactions, including rental of office space, participation in a money pool arrangement, other operational transactions and their proportionate share of certain charged expenses. See Note 7 for more information regarding money pool. These transactions of the Subsidiary Registrants are incurred in the ordinary course of business and are eliminated in consolidation.
As discussed in Note 18, certain trade receivables have been sold by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana to CRC, an affiliate formed by a subsidiary of Duke Energy. The proceeds obtained from the sales of receivables are largely cash but do include a subordinated note from CRC for a portion of the purchase price.
Intercompany Income Taxes
Duke Energy and the Subsidiary Registrants file a consolidated federal income tax return and other state and jurisdictional returns. The Subsidiary Registrants have a tax sharing agreement with Duke Energy for the allocation of consolidated tax liabilities and benefits. Income taxes recorded represent amounts the Subsidiary Registrants would incur as separate C-Corporations. The following table includes the balance of intercompany income tax receivables and payables for the Subsidiary Registrants.
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
EnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)CarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
December 31, 2022
Intercompany income tax receivable$ $95 $36 $17 $ $ $ 
Intercompany income tax payable37    17 18 38 
December 31, 2021
Intercompany income tax receivable$— $— $— $40 $19 $— $— 
Intercompany income tax payable62 — 84 — — 10 27 
15. DERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
The Duke Energy Registrants use commodity, interest rate and foreign currency contracts to manage commodity price risk, interest rate risk and foreign currency exchange rate risk. The primary use of commodity derivatives is to hedge the generation portfolio against changes in the prices of electricity and natural gas. Piedmont enters into natural gas supply contracts to provide diversification, reliability and natural gas cost benefits to its customers. Interest rate derivatives are used to manage interest rate risk associated with borrowings. Foreign currency derivatives are used to manage risk related to foreign currency exchange rates on certain issuances of debt. Derivatives related to interest rate risk for the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups are included in the following disclosures. See Note 2 for further information.
All derivative instruments not identified as NPNS are recorded at fair value as assets or liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Cash collateral related to derivative instruments executed under master netting arrangements is offset against the collateralized derivatives on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The cash impacts of settled derivatives are recorded as operating activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
INTEREST RATE RISK
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to changes in interest rates as a result of their issuance or anticipated issuance of variable-rate and fixed-rate debt and commercial paper. Interest rate risk is managed by limiting variable-rate exposures to a percentage of total debt and by monitoring changes in interest rates. To manage risk associated with changes in interest rates, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into interest rate swaps, U.S. Treasury lock agreements and other financial contracts. In anticipation of certain fixed-rate debt issuances, a series of forward-starting interest rate swaps or Treasury locks may be executed to lock in components of current market interest rates. These instruments are later terminated prior to or upon the issuance of the corresponding debt.
175

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Cash Flow Hedges
For a derivative designated as hedging the exposure to variable cash flows of a future transaction, referred to as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the derivative's gain or loss is initially reported as a component of other comprehensive income and subsequently reclassified into earnings once the future transaction impacts earnings. Amounts for interest rate contracts are reclassified to earnings as interest expense over the term of the related debt. See Note 2 for information on the de-designation of interest rate swaps and related gain reclassified out of AOCI for the year ended December 31, 2022, related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. Gains and losses reclassified out of AOCI for the years ended December 31, 2021, and 2020, were not material. Duke Energy's interest rate derivatives designated as hedges include forward-starting interest rate swaps not accounted for under regulatory accounting.
Undesignated Contracts
Undesignated contracts primarily include contracts not designated as a hedge because they are accounted for under regulatory accounting or contracts that do not qualify for hedge accounting.
Duke Energy’s interest rate swaps for its regulated operations employ regulatory accounting. With regulatory accounting, the mark-to-market gains or losses on the swaps are deferred as regulatory liabilities or regulatory assets, respectively. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized consistent with the treatment of the related costs in the ratemaking process. The accrual of interest on the swaps is recorded as Interest Expense on the Duke Energy Registrant's Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income.
The following tables show notional amounts of outstanding derivatives related to interest rate risk.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndianaOhio
Cash flow hedges$500 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Undesignated contracts2,979 1,250 800 500 300 300 27 
Total notional amount$3,479 $1,250 $800 $500 $300 $300 $27 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressIndianaOhio
Cash flow hedges$2,415 $— $— $— $— $— 
Undesignated contracts1,177 350 500 500 300 27 
Total notional amount$3,592 $350 $500 $500 $300 $27 
COMMODITY PRICE RISK
The Duke Energy Registrants are exposed to the impact of changes in the prices of electricity purchased and sold in bulk power markets and natural gas purchases, including Piedmont's natural gas supply contracts. Exposure to commodity price risk is influenced by a number of factors including the term of contracts, the liquidity of markets and delivery locations. To manage risk associated with commodity prices, the Duke Energy Registrants may enter into long-term power purchase or sales contracts and long-term natural gas supply agreements.
Undesignated Contracts
For the Subsidiary Registrants, bulk power electricity and natural gas purchases flow through fuel adjustment clauses, formula-based contracts or other cost sharing mechanisms. Differences between the costs included in rates and the incurred costs, including undesignated derivative contracts, are largely deferred as regulatory assets or regulatory liabilities. Piedmont policies allow for the use of financial instruments to hedge commodity price risks. The strategy and objective of these hedging programs are to use the financial instruments to reduce natural gas cost volatility for customers.
Volumes
The tables below include volumes of outstanding commodity derivatives. Amounts disclosed represent the absolute value of notional volumes of commodity contracts excluding NPNS. The Duke Energy Registrants have netted contractual amounts where offsetting purchase and sale contracts exist with identical delivery locations and times of delivery. Where all commodity positions are perfectly offset, no quantities are shown.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electricity (GWh)14,086    1,820 12,266  
Natural gas (millions of Dth)909 307 292 292  11 299 
176

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electricity (GWh)12,369 — — — 1,681 10,688 — 
Natural gas (millions of Dth)823 264 215 215 — 336 
FOREIGN CURRENCY RISK
Duke Energy may enter into foreign currency derivatives to hedge exposure to changes in foreign currency exchange rates, such as that arising from the issuance of debt denominated in a currency other than U.S. dollars.
Fair Value Hedges
Derivatives related to existing fixed rate securities are accounted for as fair value hedges, where the derivatives’ fair value gains or losses and hedged items’ fair value gains or losses are both recorded directly to earnings on the same income statement line item, including foreign currency gains or losses arising from changes in the U.S. currency exchange rates. Duke Energy has elected to exclude the cross-currency basis spread from the assessment of effectiveness in the fair value hedges of its foreign currency risk and record any difference between the change in the fair value of the excluded components and the amounts recognized in earnings as a component of other comprehensive income or loss.
The following table shows Duke Energy's outstanding derivatives related to foreign currency risk. There were no fair value hedges in 2021.
December 31, 2022
ReceiveFair Value
Pay NotionalNotionalReceiveHedge
Gain (Loss)(a)
(in millions)Pay Rate(in millions)RateMaturity Date(in millions)
Fair value hedges
$645 4.75 %600 euros3.10 %June 2028$(3)
537 5.31 %500 euros3.85 %June 2034(2)
Total notional amount$1,182 1,100 euros$(5)
(a)    Amounts are recorded in Other Income and expenses, net on the Consolidated Statement of Operations, which offsets an equal translation adjustment of the foreign denominated debt. See the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for amounts excluded from the assessment of effectiveness for which the difference between changes in fair value and periodic amortization is recorded.
LOCATION AND FAIR VALUE OF DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES RECOGNIZED IN THE CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
The following tables show the fair value and balance sheet location of derivative instruments. Although derivatives subject to master netting arrangements are netted on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, the fair values presented below are shown gross and cash collateral on the derivatives has not been netted against the fair values shown.
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$265 $132 $99 $99 $ $5 $29 $ 
Noncurrent213 104 108 108     
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts$478 $236 $207 $207 $ $5 $29 $ 
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$101 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$228 $94 $41 $23 $17 $ $81 $ 
Noncurrent29        
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts$358 $94 $41 $23 $17 $ $81 $ 
Total Derivative Assets$836 $330 $248 $230 $17 $5 $110 $ 
177

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$175 $96 $36 $18 $19 $ $16 $27 
Noncurrent202 31 30 30    141 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts$377 $127 $66 $48 $19 $ $16 $168 
Interest Rate Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Noncurrent2     2   
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts$2 $ $ $ $ $2 $ $ 
Foreign Currency Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$18 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Noncurrent40        
Total Derivative Liabilities – Foreign Currency Contracts$58 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Total Derivative Liabilities$437 $127 $66 $48 $19 $2 $16 $168 
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Commodity Contracts
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$199 $99 $72 $72 $— $$23 $
Noncurrent113 63 50 50 — — — — 
Total Derivative Assets – Commodity Contracts$312 $162 $122 $122 $— $$23 $
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Noncurrent— — — — — — — 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$$— $$$— $— $— $— 
Total Derivative Assets – Interest Rate Contracts$$— $$$— $— $— $— 
Total Derivative Assets$320 $162 $124 $124 $— $$23 $
178

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$72 $18 $19 $$14 $— $13 $21 
Noncurrent132 — — — 118 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Commodity Contracts$204 $27 $24 $10 $14 $— $13 $139 
Interest Rate Contracts
Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current$75 $— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Noncurrent21 — — — — — — — 
Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Current10 — — — — — 
Noncurrent18 — — — — 14 — 
Total Derivative Liabilities – Interest Rate Contracts$124 $$— $— $— $$14 $— 
Total Derivative Liabilities$328 $35 $24 $10 $14 $$27 $139 
OFFSETTING ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
The following tables present the line items on the Consolidated Balance Sheets where derivatives are reported. Substantially all of Duke Energy's outstanding derivative contracts are subject to enforceable master netting arrangements. The gross amounts offset in the tables below show the effect of these netting arrangements on financial position and include collateral posted to offset the net position. The amounts shown are calculated by counterparty. Accounts receivable or accounts payable may also be available to offset exposures in the event of bankruptcy. These amounts are not included in the tables below.
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$594 $226 $140 $122 $17 $5 $110 $ 
Gross amounts offset(64)(33)(30)(30)    
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other$530 $193 $110 $92 $17 $5 $110 $ 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$242 $104 $108 $108 $ $ $ $ 
Gross amounts offset(97)(40)(57)(57)    
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other$145 $64 $51 $51 $ $ $ $ 
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$193 $96 $36 $18 $19 $ $16 $27 
Gross amounts offset(49)(15)(18)(18)  (16) 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other$144 $81 $18 $ $19 $ $ $27 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$244 $31 $30 $30 $ $2 $ $141 
Gross amounts offset(59)(29)(30)(30)    
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other$185 $2 $ $ $ $2 $ $141 
179

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSDERIVATIVES AND HEDGING
Derivative AssetsDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$204 $99 $74 $74 $— $$23 $
Gross amounts offset(25)(16)(9)(9)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Current Assets: Other$179 $83 $65 $65 $— $$23 $
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$116 $63 $50 $50 $— $— $— $— 
Gross amounts offset(23)(15)(8)(8)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Assets: Other$93 $48 $42 $42 $— $— $— $— 
Derivative LiabilitiesDecember 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current
Gross amounts recognized$157 $26 $19 $$14 $$13 $21 
Gross amounts offset(11)(6)(5)(5)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Current Liabilities: Other$146 $20 $14 $— $14 $$13 $21 
Noncurrent
Gross amounts recognized$171 $$$$— $$14 $118 
Gross amounts offset(12)(8)(5)(5)— — — — 
Net amounts presented in Other Noncurrent Liabilities: Other$159 $$— $— $— $$14 $118 
OBJECTIVE CREDIT CONTINGENT FEATURES
Certain derivative contracts contain objective credit contingent features. These features include the requirement to post cash collateral or letters of credit if specific events occur, such as a credit rating downgrade below investment grade. The following tables show information with respect to derivative contracts that are in a net liability position and contain objective credit risk-related payment provisions.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$141 $86 $55 $48 $7 
Fair value of collateral already posted     
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggered141 86 55 48 7 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFlorida
Aggregate fair value of derivatives in a net liability position$32 $18 $14 $10 $
Fair value of collateral already posted— — — — — 
Additional cash collateral or letters of credit in the event credit risk-related contingent features were triggered32 18 14 10 
The Duke Energy Registrants have elected to offset cash collateral and fair values of derivatives. For amounts to be netted, the derivative and cash collateral must be executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting arrangement.
180

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
16. INVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Duke Energy’s investments in debt and equity securities are primarily comprised of investments held in (i) the NDTF at Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, (ii) the grantor trusts at Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Indiana related to OPEB plans and (iii) Bison. The Duke Energy Registrants classify investments in debt securities as AFS and investments in equity securities as FV-NI.
For investments in debt securities classified as AFS, the unrealized gains and losses are included in other comprehensive income until realized, at which time they are reported through net income. For investments in equity securities classified as FV-NI, both realized and unrealized gains and losses are reported through net income. Substantially all of Duke Energy’s investments in debt and equity securities qualify for regulatory accounting, and accordingly, all associated realized and unrealized gains and losses on these investments are deferred as a regulatory asset or liability.
Duke Energy classifies the majority of investments in debt and equity securities as long term, unless otherwise noted.
Investment Trusts
The investments within the Investment Trusts are managed by independent investment managers with discretion to buy, sell and invest pursuant to the objectives set forth by the investment manager agreements and trust agreements. The Duke Energy Registrants have limited oversight of the day-to-day management of these investments. As a result, the ability to hold investments in unrealized loss positions is outside the control of the Duke Energy Registrants. Accordingly, all unrealized losses associated with debt securities within the Investment Trusts are recognized immediately and deferred to regulatory accounts where appropriate.
Other AFS Securities
Unrealized gains and losses on all other AFS securities are included in other comprehensive income until realized, unless it is determined the carrying value of an investment has a credit loss. The Duke Energy Registrants analyze all investment holdings each reporting period to determine whether a decline in fair value is related to a credit loss. If a credit loss exists, the unrealized credit loss is included in earnings. There were no material credit losses as of December 31, 2022, and 2021.
Other Investments amounts are recorded in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
DUKE ENERGY
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $215 $— $— $160 
Equity securities3,658 105 5,871 4,905 43 7,350 
Corporate debt securities1 85 641 39 829 
Municipal bonds 39 330 14 314 
U.S. government bonds2 112 1,423 31 12 1,568 
Other debt securities 18 156 180 
Total NDTF Investments$3,661 $359 $8,636 $4,992 $63 $10,401 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $22 $— $— $36 
Equity securities21 16 128 36 — 156 
Corporate debt securities 12 84 119 
Municipal bonds 3 78 80 
U.S. government bonds 2 62 — — 56 
Other debt securities 3 41 — 45 
Total Other Investments$21 $36 $415 $41 $$492 
Total Investments$3,682 $395 $9,051 $5,033 $66 $10,893 
181

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$201 $724 $366 
Realized losses316 141 174 
AFS:
Realized gains28 56 96 
Realized losses151 54 51 
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022 December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $117 $— $— $53 
Equity securities2,147 51 3,367 2,887 19 4,265 
Corporate debt securities1 62 401 24 506 
Municipal bonds 10 64 — 48 
U.S. government bonds1 51 685 16 712 
Other debt securities 18 148 175 
Total NDTF Investments$2,149 $192 $4,782 $2,932 $27 $5,759 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$124 $440 $64 
Realized losses177 96 99 
AFS:
Realized gains22 38 60 
Realized losses86 37 37 
182

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
PROGRESS ENERGY
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $98 $— $— $107 
Equity securities1,511 54 2,504 2,018 24 3,085 
Corporate debt securities 23 240 15 323 
Municipal bonds 29 266 12 266 
U.S. government bonds1 61 738 15 856 
Other debt securities  8 — — 
Total NDTF Investments$1,512 $167 $3,854 $2,060 $36 $4,642 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $11 $— $— $20 
Municipal bonds  25 — 26 
Total Other Investments$ $ $36 $$— $46 
Total Investments$1,512 $167 $3,890 $2,062 $36 $4,688 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$77 $284 $302 
Realized losses139 45 75 
AFS:
Realized gains6 16 24 
Realized losses48 14 13 
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $56 $— $— $94 
Equity securities1,431 54 2,411 1,915 23 2,970 
Corporate debt securities 22 230 15 282 
Municipal bonds 29 266 12 266 
U.S. government bonds1 37 460 15 472 
Other debt securities  7 — — 
Total NDTF Investments$1,432 $142 $3,430 $1,957 $29 $4,089 
Other Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $9 $— $— $16 
Total Other Investments$ $ $9 $— $— $16 
Total Investments$1,432 $142 $3,439 $1,957 $29 $4,105 
183

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$76 $283 $52 
Realized losses136 44 59 
AFS:
Realized gains6 15 24 
Realized losses44 13 13 
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are classified as FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
NDTF       
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $42 $— $— $13 
Equity securities80  93 103 115 
Corporate debt securities 1 10 — — 41 
U.S. government bonds 24 278 — 384 
Other debt securities  1 — — — 
Total NDTF Investments(a)
$80 $25 $424 $103 $$553 
Other Investments   
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1 $— $— $
Municipal bonds  25 — 26 
Total Other Investments$ $ $26 $$— $29 
Total Investments$80 $25 $450 $105 $$582 
(a)    During the years ended December 31, 2022, and 2021, Duke Energy Florida continued to receive reimbursements from the NDTF for costs related to ongoing decommissioning activity of the Crystal River Unit 3.
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were as follows.
Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
FV-NI:
Realized gains$1 $$250 
Realized losses3 16 
AFS:
Realized gains — 
Realized losses4 — 
184

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINVESTMENTS IN DEBT AND EQUITY SECURITIES
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
The following table presents the estimated fair value of investments in debt and equity securities; equity investments are measured at FV-NI and debt investments are classified as AFS.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
GrossGrossGrossGross
UnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealizedUnrealized
HoldingHoldingEstimatedHoldingHoldingEstimated
(in millions)GainsLossesFair ValueGainsLossesFair Value
Investments      
Cash and cash equivalents$ $ $1 $— $— $— 
Equity securities2 16 79 — 97 
Corporate debt securities 1 8 — — 
Municipal bonds 3 45 46 
U.S. government bonds  7 — — 12 
Total Investments$2 $20 $140 $$$161 
Realized gains and losses, which were determined on a specific identification basis, from sales of FV-NI and AFS securities for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, were immaterial.
DEBT SECURITY MATURITIES
The table below summarizes the maturity date for debt securities.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaIndiana
Due in one year or less$137 $7 $89 $24 $65 $8 
Due after one through five years807 287 443 244 199 22 
Due after five through 10 years469 230 193 178 15 6 
Due after 10 years1,402 774 552 517 35 24 
Total$2,815 $1,298 $1,277 $963 $314 $60 
17. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is the exchange price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair value definition focuses on an exit price versus the acquisition cost. Fair value measurements use market data or assumptions market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about risk and the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation technique. These inputs may be readily observable, corroborated by market data, or generally unobservable. Valuation techniques maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. A midmarket pricing convention (the midpoint price between bid and ask prices) is permitted for use as a practical expedient.
Fair value measurements are classified in three levels based on the fair value hierarchy as defined by GAAP. Certain investments are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy. These investments are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient. The net asset value is derived based on the investment cost, less any impairment, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes for an identical or similar investment of the same issuer.
Fair value accounting guidance permits entities to elect to measure certain financial instruments that are not required to be accounted for at fair value, such as equity method investments or the company’s own debt, at fair value. The Duke Energy Registrants have not elected to record any of these items at fair value.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed below are as follows.
Investments in equity securities
The majority of investments in equity securities are valued using Level 1 measurements. Investments in equity securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the last business day of the quarter. Principal active markets for equity prices include published exchanges such as the NYSE and Nasdaq Stock Market. Foreign equity prices are translated from their trading currency using the currency exchange rate in effect at the close of the principal active market. There was no after-hours market activity that was required to be reflected in the reported fair value measurements.
Investments in debt securities
Most investments in debt securities are valued using Level 2 measurements because the valuations use interest rate curves and credit spreads applied to the terms of the debt instrument (maturity and coupon interest rate) and consider the counterparty credit rating. If the market for a particular fixed-income security is relatively inactive or illiquid, the measurement is Level 3.
185

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Commodity derivatives
Commodity derivatives with clearinghouses are classified as Level 1. Commodity derivatives with observable forward curves are classified as Level 2. If forward price curves are not observable for the full term of the contract and the unobservable period had more than an insignificant impact on the valuation, the commodity derivative is classified as Level 3. In isolation, increases (decreases) in natural gas forward prices result in favorable (unfavorable) fair value adjustments for natural gas purchase contracts; and increases (decreases) in electricity forward prices result in unfavorable (favorable) fair value adjustments for electricity sales contracts. Duke Energy regularly evaluates and validates pricing inputs used to estimate the fair value of natural gas commodity contracts by a market participant price verification procedure. This procedure provides a comparison of internal forward commodity curves to market participant generated curves.
Interest rate derivatives
Most over-the-counter interest rate contract derivatives are valued using financial models that utilize observable inputs for similar instruments and are classified as Level 2. Inputs include forward interest rate curves, notional amounts, interest rates and credit quality of the counterparties. Derivatives related to interest rate risk for the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups are included in the following disclosures. See Note 2 for further information.
Other fair value considerations
See Note 2 for further information on the valuation of the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 12 for a discussion of the valuation of goodwill and intangible assets.
DUKE ENERGY
The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Derivative amounts in the tables below for all Duke Energy Registrants exclude cash collateral, which is disclosed in Note 15. See Note 16 for additional information related to investments by major security type for the Duke Energy Registrants.
 December 31, 2022
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$215 $215 $ $ $ 
NDTF equity securities5,871 5,829   42 
NDTF debt securities2,550 780 1,770   
Other equity securities128 128    
Other debt securities265 55 210   
Other cash and cash equivalents22 22    
Derivative assets836 1 801 34  
Total assets9,887 7,030 2,781 34 42 
Derivative liabilities(437)(16)(421)  
Net assets (liabilities)$9,450 $7,014 $2,360 $34 $42 
 December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$160 $160 $— $— $— 
NDTF equity securities7,350 7,300 — — 50 
NDTF debt securities2,891 967 1,924 — — 
Other equity securities156 156 — — — 
Other debt securities300 45 255 — — 
Other cash and cash equivalents36 36 — — — 
Derivative assets320 293 24 — 
Total assets11,213 8,667 2,472 24 50 
Derivative liabilities(327)(13)(314)— — 
Net assets (liabilities)$10,886 $8,654 $2,158 $24 $50 
186

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table provides reconciliations of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$24 $
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases78 21 
Settlements(36)(20)
Total gains (losses) included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(32)15 
Balance at end of period$34 $24 
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS
The following tables provide recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$117 $117 $ $ 
NDTF equity securities3,367 3,325  42 
NDTF debt securities1,298 323 975  
Derivative assets330  330  
Total assets5,112 3,765 1,305 42 
Derivative liabilities(127) (127) 
Net assets$4,985 $3,765 $1,178 $42 
 December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Not Categorized
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$53 $53 $— $— 
NDTF equity securities4,265 4,215 — 50 
NDTF debt securities1,441 339 1,102 — 
Derivative assets162 — 162 — 
Total assets5,921 4,607 1,264 50 
Derivative liabilities(35)— (35)— 
Net assets$5,886 $4,607 $1,229 $50 
PROGRESS ENERGY
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$98 $98 $ $107 $107 $— 
NDTF equity securities2,504 2,504  3,085 3,085 — 
NDTF debt securities1,252 457 795 1,450 628 822 
Other debt securities25  25 26 — 26 
Other cash and cash equivalents11 11  20 20 — 
Derivative assets248  248 124 — 124 
Total assets4,138 3,070 1,068 4,812 3,840 972 
Derivative liabilities(66) (66)(24)— (24)
Net assets$4,072 $3,070 $1,002 $4,788 $3,840 $948 
187

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$56 $56 $ $94 $94 $— 
NDTF equity securities2,411 2,411  2,970 2,970 — 
NDTF debt securities963 225 738 1,025 289 736 
Other cash and cash equivalents9 9  16 16 — 
Derivative assets230  230 124 — 124 
Total assets3,669 2,701 968 4,229 3,369 860 
Derivative liabilities(48) (48)(10)— (10)
Net assets$3,621 $2,701 $920 $4,219 $3,369 $850 
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
NDTF cash and cash equivalents$42 $42 $ $13 $13 $— 
NDTF equity securities93 93  115 115 — 
NDTF debt securities289 232 57 425 339 86 
Other debt securities25  25 26 — 26 
Other cash and cash equivalents1 1  — 
Derivative assets17  17 — — — 
Total assets467 368 99 582 470 112 
Derivative liabilities(19) (19)(14)— (14)
Net assets$448 $368 $80 $568 $470 $98 
DUKE ENERGY OHIO
The recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets were not material at December 31, 2022, and 2021.
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Other equity securities$79 $79 $ $ $97 $97 $— $— 
Other debt securities60  60  64 — 64 — 
Other cash equivalents1 1   — — — — 
Derivative assets110  81 29 23 — 22 
Total assets250 80 141 29 184 98 64 22 
Derivative liabilities(16)(16)  (27)(13)(14)— 
Net assets$234 $64 $141 $29 $157 $85 $50 $22 
188

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value using Level 3 measurements.
 Derivatives (net)
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Balance at beginning of period$22 $
Purchases, sales, issuances and settlements:
Purchases74 18 
Settlements(32)(16)
Total (losses) gains included on the Consolidated Balance Sheet(35)14 
Balance at end of period$29 $22 
PIEDMONT
The following table provides recorded balances for assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2Total Fair ValueLevel 1Level 2
Derivative assets$ $ $ $$$— 
Derivative liabilities(168) (168)(139)— (139)
Net (liabilities) assets$(168)$ $(168)$(136)$$(139)
QUANTITATIVE INFORMATION ABOUT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS
The following tables include quantitative information about the Duke Energy Registrants' derivatives classified as Level 3.
December 31, 2022
Weighted
Fair ValueAverage
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs$5 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.89 $6.25 $3.35 
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs29 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh0.09 21.79 2.74 
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives$34 
December 31, 2021
Weighted
Fair ValueAverage
Investment Type(in millions)Valuation TechniqueUnobservable InputRangeRange
Duke Energy Ohio
FTRs$RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh$0.06 $1.79 $0.96 
Duke Energy Indiana
FTRs22 RTO auction pricingFTR price – per MWh(1.18)13.11 2.68 
Duke Energy
Total Level 3 derivatives$24 
189

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSFAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
OTHER FAIR VALUE DISCLOSURES
The fair value and book value of long-term debt, including current maturities, is summarized in the following table. The following disclosures include debt attributable to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details. Estimates determined are not necessarily indicative of amounts that could have been settled in current markets. Fair value of long-term debt uses Level 2 measurements.
 December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
(in millions)Book ValueFair ValueBook ValueFair Value
Duke Energy(a)
$71,215 $63,454 $63,835 $69,683 
Duke Energy Carolinas14,266 12,943 13,275 15,101 
Progress Energy22,439 20,467 20,823 23,751 
Duke Energy Progress11,087 9,689 10,249 11,252 
Duke Energy Florida9,709 8,991 8,482 9,772 
Duke Energy Ohio3,245 2,927 3,193 3,570 
Duke Energy Indiana4,307 3,913 4,323 5,067 
Piedmont3,363 2,940 2,968 3,278 
(a)    Book value of long-term debt includes $1.17 billion as of December 31, 2022, and $1.25 billion as of December 31, 2021, of unamortized debt discount and premium, net in purchase accounting adjustments related to the mergers with Progress Energy and Piedmont that are excluded from fair value of long-term debt.
At both December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, fair value of cash and cash equivalents, accounts and notes receivable, accounts payable, notes payable and commercial paper, and nonrecourse notes payable of VIEs are not materially different from their carrying amounts because of the short-term nature of these instruments and/or because the stated rates approximate market rates.
18. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
A VIE is an entity that is evaluated for consolidation using more than a simple analysis of voting control. The analysis to determine whether an entity is a VIE considers contracts with an entity, credit support for an entity, the adequacy of the equity investment of an entity and the relationship of voting power to the amount of equity invested in an entity. This analysis is performed either upon the creation of a legal entity or upon the occurrence of an event requiring reevaluation, such as a significant change in an entity’s assets or activities. A qualitative analysis of control determines the party that consolidates a VIE. This assessment is based on (i) what party has the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and (ii) what party has rights to receive benefits or is obligated to absorb losses that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The analysis of the party that consolidates a VIE is a continual reassessment.
CONSOLIDATED VIEs
The obligations of the consolidated VIEs discussed in the following paragraphs are nonrecourse to the Duke Energy Registrants. The registrants have no requirement to provide liquidity to, purchase assets of or guarantee performance of these VIEs unless noted in the following paragraphs.
No financial support was provided to any of the consolidated VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, or is expected to be provided in the future, that was not previously contractually required.
Receivables Financing – DERF/DEPR/DEFR
DERF, DEPR and DEFR are bankruptcy remote, special purpose subsidiaries of Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida, respectively. DERF, DEPR and DEFR are wholly owned LLCs with separate legal existence from their parent companies, and their assets are not generally available to creditors of their parent companies. On a revolving basis, DERF, DEPR and DEFR buy certain accounts receivable arising from the sale of electricity and related services from their parent companies.
DERF, DEPR and DEFR borrow amounts under credit facilities to buy these receivables. Borrowing availability from the credit facilities is limited to the amount of qualified receivables purchased, which generally exclude receivables past due more than a predetermined number of days and reserves for expected past-due balances. The sole source of funds to satisfy the related debt obligations is cash collections from the receivables. Amounts borrowed under the credit facilities are reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt.
The most significant activity that impacts the economic performance of DERF, DEPR and DEFR are the decisions made to manage delinquent receivables. Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Duke Energy Florida are considered the primary beneficiaries and consolidate DERF, DEPR and DEFR, respectively, as they make those decisions.
Receivables Financing – CRC
CRC is a bankruptcy remote, special purpose entity indirectly owned by Duke Energy. On a revolving basis, CRC buys certain accounts receivable arising from the sale of electricity, natural gas and related services from Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. CRC borrows amounts under a credit facility to buy the receivables from Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. Borrowing availability from the credit facility is limited to the amount of qualified receivables sold to CRC, which generally exclude receivables past due more than a predetermined number of days and reserves for expected past-due balances. The sole source of funds to satisfy the related debt obligation is cash collections from the receivables. Amounts borrowed under the credit facility are reflected on Duke Energy's Consolidated Balance Sheets as Long-Term Debt.
190

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
The proceeds Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana receive from the sale of receivables to CRC are approximately 75% cash and 25% in the form of a subordinated note from CRC. The subordinated note is a retained interest in the receivables sold. Depending on collection experience, additional equity infusions to CRC may be required by Duke Energy to maintain a minimum equity balance of $3 million.
CRC is considered a VIE because (i) equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations, (ii) power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance of the entity is not held by the equity holder and (iii) deficiencies in net worth of CRC are funded by Duke Energy. The most significant activities that impact the economic performance of CRC are decisions made to manage delinquent receivables. Duke Energy is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates CRC as it makes these decisions. Neither Duke Energy Ohio nor Duke Energy Indiana consolidate CRC.
Receivables Financing – Credit Facilities
The following table summarizes the amounts and expiration dates of the credit facilities and associated restricted receivables described above.
Duke Energy
Duke EnergyDuke EnergyDuke Energy
CarolinasProgressFlorida
(in millions)CRCDERFDEPRDEFR
Expiration dateFebruary 2025January 2025April 2025April 2023
Credit facility amount$350 $500 $400 $250 
Amounts borrowed at December 31, 2022350 471 400 250 
Amounts borrowed at December 31, 2021350 475 350 250 
Restricted Receivables at December 31, 2022917 928 793 490 
Restricted Receivables at December 31, 2021587 844 574 427 
Nuclear Asset-Recovery Bonds – Duke Energy Florida Project Finance, LLC (DEFPF)
DEFPF is a bankruptcy remote, wholly owned special purpose subsidiary of Duke Energy Florida. DEFPF was formed in 2016 for the sole purpose of issuing nuclear asset-recovery bonds to finance Duke Energy Florida's unrecovered regulatory asset related to Crystal River Unit 3.
In 2016, DEFPF issued senior secured bonds and used the proceeds to acquire nuclear asset-recovery property from Duke Energy Florida. The nuclear asset-recovery property acquired includes the right to impose, bill, collect and adjust a non-bypassable nuclear asset-recovery charge from all Duke Energy Florida retail customers until the bonds are paid in full and all financing costs have been recovered. The nuclear asset-recovery bonds are secured by the nuclear asset-recovery property and cash collections from the nuclear asset-recovery charges are the sole source of funds to satisfy the debt obligation. The bondholders have no recourse to Duke Energy Florida.
DEFPF is considered a VIE primarily because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support its operations. Duke Energy Florida has the power to direct the significant activities of the VIE as described above and therefore Duke Energy Florida is considered the primary beneficiary and consolidates DEFPF.
The following table summarizes the impact of DEFPF on Duke Energy Florida's Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31,
(in millions)20222021
Receivables of VIEs$6 $
Regulatory Assets: Current55 54 
Current Assets: Other41 39 
Other Noncurrent Assets: Regulatory assets826 883 
Current Liabilities: Other9 
Current maturities of long-term debt56 56 
Long-Term Debt890 946 
Storm Recovery Bonds – Duke Energy Carolinas NC Storm Funding and Duke Energy Progress NC Storm Funding
Duke Energy Carolinas NC Storm Funding, LLC. (DECNCSF) and Duke Energy Progress NC Storm Funding, LLC. (DEPNCSF) are bankruptcy remote, wholly owned special purpose subsidiaries of Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress, respectively. These entities were formed in 2021 for the sole purpose of issuing storm recovery bonds to finance certain of Duke Energy Carolinas’ and Duke Energy Progress’ unrecovered regulatory assets related to storm costs.
In November 2021, DECNCSF and DEPNCSF issued $237 million and $770 million of senior secured bonds, respectively and used the proceeds to acquire storm recovery property from Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress. The storm recovery property was created by state legislation and NCUC financing orders for the purpose of financing storm costs incurred in 2018 and 2019. The storm recovery property acquired includes the right to impose, bill, collect and adjust a non-bypassable charge from all Duke Energy Carolinas’ and Duke Energy Progress’ retail customers until the bonds are paid in full and all financing costs have been recovered. The storm recovery bonds are secured by the storm recovery property and cash collections from the storm recovery charges are the sole source of funds to satisfy the debt obligation. The bondholders have no recourse to Duke Energy Carolinas or Duke Energy Progress. For additional information, see Notes 4 and 7.
191

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES
DECNCSF and DEPNCSF are considered VIEs primarily because the equity capitalization is insufficient to support their operations. Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress have the power to direct the significant activities of the VIEs as described above and therefore Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress are considered the primary beneficiaries and consolidate DECNCSF and DEPNCSF, respectively.
The following table summarizes the impact of these VIEs on Duke Energy Carolinas’ and Duke Energy Progress’ Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Duke Energy CarolinasDuke Energy Progress
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Regulatory Assets: Current$12 $12 $39 $39 
Current Assets: Other8  29  
Other Noncurrent Assets: Regulatory assets208 220 681 720 
Other Noncurrent Assets: Other1 1 2 4 
Current maturities of long-term debt10 5 34 15 
Current Liabilities: Other3 1 8 2 
Long-Term Debt219 228 714 747 
NON-CONSOLIDATED VIEs
The following tables summarize the impact of non-consolidated VIEs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 December 31, 2022
 Duke EnergyDukeDuke
Natural GasEnergyEnergy
(in millions)InvestmentsOhioIndiana
Receivables from affiliated companies$ $198 $317 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates43   
Other noncurrent assets45   
Total assets$88 $198 $317 
Other current liabilities59   
Other noncurrent liabilities47   
Total liabilities$106 $ $ 
Net (liabilities) assets$(18)$198 $317 
 December 31, 2021
 Duke EnergyDukeDuke
Natural GasEnergyEnergy
(in millions)InvestmentsOhioIndiana
Receivables from affiliated companies$— $79 $97 
Investments in equity method unconsolidated affiliates15 — — 
Other noncurrent assets61 — — 
Total assets$76 $79 $97 
Other current liabilities47 — — 
Other noncurrent liabilities54 — — 
Total liabilities$101 $— $— 
Net (liabilities) assets$(25)$79 $97 
The Duke Energy Registrants are not aware of any situations where the maximum exposure to loss significantly exceeds the carrying values shown above.
Natural Gas Investments
Duke Energy has investments in various joint ventures withincluding pipeline projects currently under construction.and renewable natural gas projects. These entities are considered VIEs due to having insufficient equity to finance their own activities without subordinated financial support. Duke Energy does not have the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the economic performance, the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits of these VIEs and therefore does not consolidate these entities.

Duke Energy has a 47% ownership interest in ACP. In 2020, Duke Energy determined that it would no longer invest in the construction of the ACP pipeline. In February 2021, Duke Energy paid approximately $855 million to fund ACP's outstanding debt, relieving Duke Energy of its guarantee. See Notes 4, 8 and 13 for further information regarding this transaction.
202
192




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES


The table below presents Duke Energy's ownership interest and investment balances in these joint ventures.
   VIE Investment Amount (in millions)
 Ownership December 31, December 31,
Entity NameInterest 2019 2018
ACP(a)
47% $1,179
 $797
Constitution(b)
24% 
 25
Total  $1,179
 $822
(a)Duke Energy evaluated this investment for impairment as of December 31, 2019, and 2018, and determined that fair value approximated carrying value and therefore no impairment was necessary.
(b)During the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, Duke Energy recorded an OTTI of $25 million and $55 million, respectively, related to Constitution within Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on Duke Energy's Consolidated Statements of Income. The current year charge resulted in the full write-down of Duke Energy's investment in Constitution. See Notes 4 and 13 for additional information.
Commercial Renewables
Duke Energy has investments in various renewable energy project entities. Some of these entities are VIEs due to Duke Energy issuing guarantees for debt service and operations and maintenance reserves in support of debt financings. Duke Energy does not consolidate these VIEs because power to direct and control key activities is shared jointly by Duke Energy and other owners. In 2019, Duke Energy acquired a majority ownership in a portfolio of distributed fuel cell projects from Bloom Energy Corporation. Duke Energy is not the primary beneficiary of the assets within the portfolio and does not consolidate the assets in the portfolio.
OVEC
Duke Energy Ohio’s 9% ownership interest in OVEC is considered a non-consolidated VIE due to OVEC having insufficient equity to finance its activities without subordinated financial support. The activities that most significantly impact OVEC's economic performance include fuel strategy and supply activities and decisions associated with ongoing operations and maintenance-related activities. Duke Energy Ohio does not have the unilateral power to direct these activities, and therefore, does not consolidate OVEC.
As a counterparty to an Inter-Company Power Agreement (ICPA), Duke Energy Ohio has a contractual arrangement to receive entitlements to capacity and energy from OVEC’s power plants through June 2040 commensurate with its power participation ratio, which is equivalent to Duke Energy Ohio's ownership interest. Costs, including fuel, operating expenses, fixed costs, debt amortization and interest expense, are allocated to counterparties to the ICPA based on their power participation ratio. The value of the ICPA is subject to variability due to fluctuation in power prices and changes in OVEC's cost of business. On March 31, 2018, FES, a subsidiary of FirstEnergy Corp. and an ICPA counterparty with a power participation ratio of 4.85%, filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy, which could increase costs allocated to the counterparties. On July 31, 2018, the bankruptcy court rejected the FES ICPA, which means OVEC is an unsecured creditor in the FES bankruptcy proceeding. Duke Energy Ohio cannot predict the impact of the bankruptcy filing on its OVEC interests. In addition, certain proposed environmental rulemaking could result in future increased OVEC cost allocations. See Note 4 for additional information.
CRC
See discussion under Consolidated VIEs for additional information related to CRC.
Amounts included in Receivables from affiliated companies in the above table for Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana reflect their retained interest in receivables sold to CRC. These subordinated notes held by Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana are stated at fair value. Carrying values of retained interests are determined by allocating carrying value of the receivables between assets sold and interests retained based on relative fair value. The allocated bases of the subordinated notes are not materially different than their face value because (i) the receivables generally turnover in less than two months, (ii) credit losses are reasonably predictable due to the broad customer base and lack of significant concentration and (iii) the equity in CRC is subordinate to all retained interests and thus would absorb losses first. The hypothetical effect on fair value of the retained interests assuming both a 10% and a 20% unfavorable variation in credit losses or discount rates is not material due to the short turnover of receivables and historically low credit loss history. Interest accrues to Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana on the retained interests using the acceptable yield method. This method generally approximates the stated rate on the notes since the allocated basis and the face value are nearly equivalent. An impairment charge is recorded against the carrying value of both retained interests and purchased beneficial interest whenever it is determined that an OTTIother-than-temporary impairment has occurred.
Key assumptions used in estimating fair value are detailed in the following table.
Duke Energy Ohio Duke Energy Indiana Duke Energy OhioDuke Energy Indiana
2019
 2018
 2019
 2018
2022202120222021
Anticipated credit loss ratio0.6% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3%Anticipated credit loss ratio0.5 %0.5 %0.3 %0.3 %
Discount rate3.3% 3.0% 3.3% 3.0%Discount rate2.7 %1.1 %2.7 %1.1 %
Receivable turnover rate13.4% 13.5% 11.5% 11.0%Receivable turnover rate13.5 %13.5 %11.3 %11.3 %

203




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES


The following table shows the gross and net receivables sold.
 Duke Energy Ohio Duke Energy Indiana
 December 31, December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2019
 2018
Receivables sold$253
 $269
 $307
 $336
Less: Retained interests64
 93
 77
 118
Net receivables sold$189
 $176
 $230
 $218

 Duke Energy OhioDuke Energy Indiana
December 31,December 31,
(in millions)2022202120222021
Receivables sold$423 $269 $508 $328 
Less: Retained interests198 79 317 97 
Net receivables sold$225 $190 $191 $231 
The following table shows sales and cash flows related to receivables sold.
 Duke Energy Ohio Duke Energy Indiana
 Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
 2019
 2018
 2017
Sales           
Receivables sold$1,979
 $1,987
 $1,879
 $2,837
 $2,842
 $2,711
Loss recognized on sale14
 13
 10
 17
 16
 12
Cash flows           
Cash proceeds from receivables sold1,993
 1,967
 1,865
 2,860
 2,815
 2,694
Collection fees received1
 1
 1
 1
 1
 1
Return received on retained interests6
 6
 3
 9
 9
 7

 Duke Energy OhioDuke Energy Indiana
 Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020202220212020
Sales      
Receivables sold$2,562 $2,023 $1,905 $3,744 $2,909 $2,631 
Loss recognized on sale18 10 10 26 13 12 
Cash flows  
Cash proceeds from receivables sold2,424 2,018 1,875 3,498 2,909 2,586 
Collection fees received1 2 
Return received on retained interests10 15 
Cash flows from sales of receivables are reflected within Cash Flows From Operating Activities and Cash Flows from Investing Activities on Duke Energy Ohio’s and Duke Energy Indiana’s Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Collection fees received in connection with servicing transferred accounts receivable are included in Operation, maintenance and other on Duke Energy Ohio’s and Duke Energy Indiana’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income. The loss recognized on sales of receivables is calculated monthly by multiplying receivables sold during the month by the required discount. The required discount is derived monthly utilizing a three-year weighted average formula that considers charge-off history, late charge history and turnover history on the sold receivables, as well as a component for the time value of money. The discount rate, or component for the time value of money, is the prior month-end LIBORDaily Simple SOFR plus a fixed rate of 1.00%1%.
19. REVENUE
Duke Energy recognizes revenue consistent with amounts billed under tariff offerings or at contractually agreed upon rates based on actual physical delivery of electric or natural gas service, including estimated volumes delivered when billings have not yet occurred. As such, the majority of Duke Energy’s revenues have fixed pricing based on the contractual terms of the published tariffs, with variability in expected cash flows attributable to the customer’s volumetric demand and ultimate quantities of energy or natural gas supplied and used during the billing period. The stand-alone selling price of related sales are designed to support recovery of prudently incurred costs and an appropriate return on invested assets and are primarily governed by published tariff rates or contractual agreements approved by relevant regulatory bodies. As described in Note 1, certain excise taxes and franchise fees levied by state or local governments are required to be paid even if not collected from the customer. These taxes are recognized on a gross basis as part of revenues. Duke Energy elects to account for all other taxes net of revenues.
193

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE
Performance obligations are satisfied over time as energy or natural gas is delivered and consumed with billings generally occurring monthly and related payments due within 30 days, depending on regulatory requirements. In no event does the timing between payment and delivery of the goods and services exceed one year. Using this output method for revenue recognition provides a faithful depiction of the transfer of electric and natural gas service as customers obtain control of the commodity and benefit from its use at delivery. Additionally, Duke Energy has an enforceable right to consideration for energy or natural gas delivered at any discrete point in time and will recognize revenue at an amount that reflects the consideration to which Duke Energy is entitled for the energy or natural gas delivered.
As described above, the majority of Duke Energy’s tariff revenues are at-will and, as such, related contracts with customers have an expected duration of one year or less and will not have future performance obligations for disclosure. Additionally, other long-term revenue streams, including wholesale contracts, generally provide services that are part of a single performance obligation, the delivery of electricity or natural gas. As such, other than material fixed consideration under long-term contracts, related disclosures for future performance obligations are also not applicable.
Duke Energy earns substantially all of its revenues through its reportable segments, Electric UtilitiesEU&I and Infrastructure, Gas Utilities and Infrastructure and Commercial Renewables.GU&I.
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Electric Utilities and InfrastructureEU&I earns the majority of its revenues through retail and wholesale electric service through the generation, transmission, distribution and sale of electricity. Duke Energy generally provides retail and wholesale electric service customers with their full electric load requirements or with supplemental load requirements when the customer has other sources of electricity.

204




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE


Retail electric service is generally marketed throughout Duke Energy's electric service territory through standard service offers. The standard service offers are through tariffs determined by regulators in Duke Energy's regulated service territory. Each tariff, which is assigned to customers based on customer class, has multiple components such as an energy charge, a demand charge, a basic facilities charge and applicable riders. Duke Energy considers each of these components to be aggregated into a single performance obligation for providing electric service, or in the case of distribution only customers in Duke Energy Ohio, for delivering electricity. Electricity is considered a single performance obligation satisfied over time consistent with the series guidance and is provided and consumed over the billing period, generally one month. Retail electric service is typically provided to at-will customers who can cancel service at any time, without a substantive penalty. Additionally, Duke Energy adheres to applicable regulatory requirements in each jurisdiction to ensure the collectability of amounts billed and appropriate mitigating procedures are followed when necessary. As such, revenue from contracts with customers for such contracts is equivalent to the electricity supplied and billed in that period (including unbilled estimates).
Wholesale electric service is generally provided under long-term contracts using cost-based pricing. FERC regulates costs that may be recovered from customers and the amount of return companies are permitted to earn. Wholesale contracts include both energy and demand charges. For full requirements contracts, Duke Energy considers both charges as a single performance obligation for providing integrated electric service. For contracts where energy and demand charges are considered separate performance obligations, energy and demand are each a distinct performance obligation under the series guidance and are satisfied as energy is delivered and stand-ready service is provided on a monthly basis. This service represents consumption over the billing period and revenue is recognized consistent with billings and unbilled estimates, which generally occur monthly. Contractual amounts owed are typically trued up annually based upon incurred costs in accordance with FERC published filings and the specific customer’s actual peak demand. Estimates of variable consideration related to potential additional billings or refunds owed are updated quarterly.
The majority of wholesale revenues are full requirements contracts where the customers purchase the substantial majority of their energy needs and do not have a fixed quantity of contractually required energy or capacity. As such, related forecasted revenues are considered optional purchases. Supplemental requirements contracts that include contracted blocks of energy and capacity at contractually fixed prices have the following estimated remaining performance obligations:
 Remaining Performance Obligations
(in millions)2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Progress Energy$121
$92
$87
$44
$45
$58
$447
Duke Energy Progress8
8
8
8
8

40
Duke Energy Florida113
84
79
36
37
58
407
Duke Energy Indiana10
5




15

Remaining Performance Obligations
(in millions)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Progress Energy$61 $66 $$$$36 $184 
Duke Energy Progress— — — — 16 
Duke Energy Florida53 58 36 168 
Duke Energy Indiana11 16 17 15 71 
Revenues for block sales are recognized monthly as energy is delivered and stand-ready service is provided, consistent with invoiced amounts and unbilled estimates.
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I earns its revenue through retail and wholesale natural gas service through the transportation, distribution and sale of natural gas. Duke Energy generally provides retail and wholesale natural gas service customers with all natural gas load requirements. Additionally, while natural gas can be stored, substantially all natural gas provided by Duke Energy is consumed by customers simultaneously with receipt of delivery.
Retail natural gas service is marketed throughout Duke Energy's natural gas service territory using published tariff rates. The tariff rates are established by regulators in Duke Energy's service territories. Each tariff, which is assigned to customers based on customer class, have multiple components, such as a commodity charge, demand charge, customer or monthly charge and transportation costs. Duke Energy considers each of these components to be aggregated into a single performance obligation for providing natural gas service. For contracts where Duke Energy provides all of the customer’s natural gas needs, the delivery of natural gas is considered a single performance obligation satisfied over time, and revenue is recognized monthly based on billings and unbilled estimates as service is provided and the commodity is consumed over the billing period. Additionally, natural gas service is typically at-will and customers can cancel service at any time, without a substantive penalty. Duke Energy also adheres to applicable regulatory requirements to ensure the collectability of amounts billed and receivable and appropriate mitigating procedures are followed when necessary.
194

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE
Certain long-term individually negotiated contracts exist to provide natural gas service. These contracts are regulated and approved by state commissions. The negotiated contracts have multiple components, including a natural gas and a demand charge, similar to retail natural gas contracts. Duke Energy considers each of these components to be a single performance obligation for providing natural gas service. This service represents consumption over the billing period, generally one month.
Fixed capacity payments under long-term contracts for the Gas Utilities and InfrastructureGU&I segment include minimum margin contracts and supply arrangements with municipalities and power generation facilities. Revenues for related sales are recognized monthly as natural gas is delivered and stand-ready service is provided, consistent with invoiced amounts and unbilled estimates. Estimated remaining performance obligations are as follows:
 Remaining Performance Obligations
(in millions)2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
Thereafter
Total
Piedmont$69
$64
$64
$61
$58
$372
$688


205




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE


Commercial Renewables
Commercial Renewables earns the majority of its revenues through long-term PPAs and generally sells all of its wind and solar facility output, electricity and RECs to customers. The majority of these PPAs have historically been accounted for as leases. For PPAs that are not accounted for as leases, the delivery of electricity and the delivery of RECs are considered separate performance obligations.
The delivery of electricity is a performance obligation satisfied over time and represents generation and consumption of the electricity over the billing period, generally one month. The delivery of RECs is a performance obligation satisfied at a point in time and represents delivery of each REC generated by the wind or solar facility. The majority of self-generated RECs are bundled with energy in Duke Energy’s contracts and, as such, related revenues are recognized as energy is generated and delivered as that pattern is consistent with Duke Energy’s performance. Commercial Renewables recognizes revenue based on the energy generated and billed for the period, generally one month, at contractual rates (including unbilled estimates) according to the invoice practical expedient. Amounts are typically due within 30 days of invoice.
Commercial Renewables also earns revenues from installation of distributed solar generation resources, which is primarily composed of EPC projects to deliver functioning solar power systems, generally completed within two to 12 months from commencement of construction. The installation of distributed solar generation resources is a performance obligation that is satisfied over time. Revenue from fixed-price EPC contracts is recognized using the input method as work is performed based on the estimated ratio of incurred costs to estimated total costs.
Remaining Performance Obligations
(in millions)20232024202520262027ThereafterTotal
Piedmont$68 $62 $61 $51 $49 $241 $532 
Other
The remainder of Duke Energy’s operations is presented as Other, which does not include material revenues from contracts with customers.

206




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE


Disaggregated Revenues
For the ElectricEU&I and Gas Utility and InfrastructureGU&I segments, revenue by customer class is most meaningful to Duke Energy as each respective customer class collectively represents unique customer expectations of service, generally has different energy and demand requirements, and operates under tailored, regulatory approved pricing structures. Additionally, each customer class is impacted differently by weather and a variety of economic factors including the level of population growth, economic investment, employment levels, and regulatory activities in each of Duke Energy’s jurisdictions. As such, analyzing revenues disaggregated by customer class allows Duke Energy to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. For the Commercial Renewables segment, the majority of revenues from contracts with customers are from selling all of the unit-contingent output at contractually defined pricing under long-term PPAs with consistent expectations regarding the timing and certainty of cash flows. Disaggregated revenues are presented as follows:
Year Ended December 31, 2019Year Ended December 31, 2022
 Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 DukeDuke
(in millions)Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 (in millions)DukeEnergyProgressEnergy
By market or type of customerEnergy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
By market or type of customerEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential$9,863
$3,044
$4,998
$2,144
$2,854
$733
$1,087
$
Residential$11,377 $3,275 $5,812 $2,378 $3,434 $862 $1,430 $ 
General6,431
2,244
2,935
1,368
1,567
451
802

General7,356 2,396 3,396 1,480 1,916 517 1,049  
Industrial3,071
1,215
934
675
259
147
774

Industrial3,504 1,251 1,095 770 325 202 956  
Wholesale2,212
462
1,468
1,281
187
46
235

Wholesale2,856 561 1,785 1,346 439 127 383  
Other revenues770
276
548
317
231
80
89

Other revenues795 372 994 768 226 61 19  
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$22,347
$7,241
$10,883
$5,785
$5,098
$1,457
$2,987
$
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$25,888 $7,855 $13,082 $6,742 $6,340 $1,769 $3,837 $ 
 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential$976
$
$
$
$
$315
$
$661
Residential$1,462 $ $ $ $ $488 $ $974 
Commercial508




130

378
Commercial765     180  585 
Industrial141




19

122
Industrial170     24  144 
Power Generation






51
Power Generation       94 
Other revenues129




19

110
Other revenues360     25  271 
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$1,754
$
$
$
$
$483
$
$1,322
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$2,757 $ $ $ $ $717 $ $2,068 
 
Commercial Renewables 
Revenue from contracts with customers$223
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
 
Other Other
Revenue from contracts with customers$24
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
Revenue from contracts with customers$30 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
 
Total revenue from contracts with customers$24,348
$7,241
$10,883
$5,785
$5,098
$1,940
$2,987
$1,322
Total revenue from contracts with customers$28,675 $7,855 $13,082 $6,742 $6,340 $2,486 $3,837 $2,068 
 
Other revenue sources(a)
$731
$154
$319
$172
$133
$
$17
$59
Other revenue sources(a)
$93 $2 $43 $11 $13 $28 $85 $56 
Total revenues$25,079
$7,395
$11,202
$5,957
$5,231
$1,940
$3,004
$1,381
Total revenues$28,768 $7,857 $13,125 $6,753 $6,353 $2,514 $3,922 $2,124 
(a)
(a)    Other revenue sources include revenues from leases, derivatives and alternative revenue programs that are not considered revenues from contracts with customers. Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over or under collection of related revenues.

207
195




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE

Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
(in millions)DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
By market or type of customerEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential$10,097 $3,054 $5,084 $2,156 $2,928 $767 $1,188 $— 
General6,375 2,210 2,883 1,378 1,505 440 825 — 
Industrial2,924 1,145 894 634 260 135 750 — 
Wholesale2,199 472 1,385 1,164 221 56 285 — 
Other revenues879 264 716 387 329 83 86 — 
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$22,474 $7,145 $10,962 $5,719 $5,243 $1,481 $3,134 $— 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential$1,131 $— $— $— $— $354 $— $777 
Commercial561 — — — — 143 — 418 
Industrial158 — — — — 20 — 137 
Power Generation— — — — — — — 92 
Other revenues133 — — — — 28 — 45 
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$1,983 $— $— $— $— $545 $— $1,469 
Other
Revenue from contracts with customers$29 $— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Total revenue from contracts with customers$24,486 $7,145 $10,962 $5,719 $5,243 $2,026 $3,134 $1,469 
Other revenue sources(a)
$135 $(43)$95 $61 $16 $11 $40 $100 
Total revenues$24,621 $7,102 $11,057 $5,780 $5,259 $2,037 $3,174 $1,569 

 Year Ended December 31, 2018
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
(in millions)Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
By market or type of customerEnergy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure        
   Residential$9,587
$2,981
$4,785
$2,019
$2,766
$743
$1,076
$
   General6,127
2,119
2,809
1,280
1,529
422
778

   Industrial2,974
1,180
904
642
262
131
760

   Wholesale2,324
508
1,462
1,303
159
57
298

   Other revenues717
320
502
320
182
73
91

Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$21,729
$7,108
$10,462
$5,564
$4,898
$1,426
$3,003
$
         
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure        
   Residential$1,000
$
$
$
$
$331
$
$669
   Commercial514




135

378
   Industrial147




18

128
   Power Generation






54
   Other revenues139




19

120
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$1,800
$
$
$
$
$503
$
$1,349
         
Commercial Renewables        
Revenue from contracts with customers$209
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
         
Other        
Revenue from contracts with customers$19
$
$
$
$
$1
$
$
         
Total revenue from contracts with customers$23,757
$7,108
$10,462
$5,564
$4,898
$1,930
$3,003
$1,349
         
Other revenue sources(a)
$764
$192
$266
$135
$123
$27
$56
$26
Total revenues$24,521
$7,300
$10,728
$5,699
$5,021
$1,957
$3,059
$1,375
(a)(a)    Other revenue sources include revenues from leases, derivatives and alternative revenue programs that are not considered revenues from contracts with customers. Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over or under collection of related revenues.
IMPACT OF WEATHER AND THE TIMING OF BILLING PERIODS
Revenues and costs are influenced by seasonal weather patterns. Peak sales of electricity occur during the summer and winter months, which results in higher revenue and cash flows during these periods. By contrast, lower sales of electricity occur during the spring and fall, allowing for scheduled plant maintenance. Residential and general service customers are more impacted by weather than industrial customers. Estimated weather impacts are based on actual current period weather compared to normal weather conditions. Normal weather conditions are defined as the long-term average of actual historical weather conditions. Heating degree days measure the variation in weather based on the extent the average daily temperature falls below a base temperature. Cooling degree days measure the variation in weather based on the extent the average daily temperature rises above the base temperature. Each degree of temperature below the base temperature counts as one heating degree day and each degree of temperature above the base temperature counts as one cooling degree day.
The estimated impact of weather on earnings for Electric Utilities and Infrastructure is based on the temperature variances from a normal condition and customers' historic usage patterns. The methodology used to estimate the impact of weather does not consider all variables that may impact customer response to weather conditions, such as humidity in the summer or wind chill in the winter. The precision of this estimate may also be impacted by applying long-term weather trends to shorter-term periods.
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure's costs and revenues are influenced by seasonal patterns due to peak natural gas sales occurring during the winter months as a result of space heating requirements. Residential customers are the most impacted by weather. There are certain regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for the North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio and Kentucky service territories that normalize the margins collected from certain customer classes during the winter. In North Carolina, rate design provides protection from both weather and other usage variations such as conservation, while South Carolina, Tennessee and Kentucky revenues are adjusted solely based on weather. Ohio primarily employs a fixed charge each month regardlessover or under collection of the season and usage.

related revenues.
208
196




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE

Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
(in millions)DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
By market or type of customerEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Electric Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential$9,806 $2,997 $5,017 $2,059 $2,958 $726 $1,064 $— 
General6,194 2,233 2,779 1,312 1,467 442 740 — 
Industrial2,859 1,137 901 649 252 137 683 — 
Wholesale1,864 380 1,228 1,034 194 32 224 — 
Other revenues914 281 596 294 302 82 72 — 
Total Electric Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$21,637 $7,028 $10,521 $5,348 $5,173 $1,419 $2,783 $— 
Gas Utilities and Infrastructure
Residential$930 $— $— $— $— $300 $— $630 
Commercial446 — — — — 117 — 329 
Industrial127 — — — — 17 — 110 
Power Generation— — — — — — — 34 
Other revenues87 — — — — 17 — 70 
Total Gas Utilities and Infrastructure revenue from contracts with customers$1,590 $— $— $— $— $451 $— $1,173 
Other
Revenue from contracts with customers$26 $— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Total revenue from contracts with customers$23,253 $7,028 $10,521 $5,348 $5,173 $1,870 $2,783 $1,173 
Other revenue sources(a)
$113 $(13)$106 $74 $15 $(12)$12 $124 
Total revenues$23,366 $7,015 $10,627 $5,422 $5,188 $1,858 $2,795 $1,297 
(a)    Other revenue sources include revenues from leases, derivatives and alternative revenue programs that are not considered revenues from contracts with customers. Alternative revenue programs in certain jurisdictions include regulatory mechanisms that periodically adjust for over or under collection of related revenues.
As described in Note 1, Duke Energy adopted the new guidance for credit losses effective January 1, 2020, using the modified retrospective method of adoption, which does not require restatement of prior year reported results. The following table presents the reserve for credit losses for trade and other receivables based on adoption of the new standard.
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Balance at December 31, 2019$76 $10 $16 $8 $7 $4 $3 $6 
Cumulative Change in Accounting Principle— — 
Write-Offs(58)(13)(23)(8)(14)— — (6)
Credit Loss Expense75 13 29 20 — — 11 
Other Adjustments48 12 13 13 — — — — 
Balance at December 31, 2020$146 $23 $37 $23 $14 $4 $3 $12 
Write-Offs(58)(21)(25)(12)(13)— — (9)
Credit Loss Expense53 27 25 11 14 — — 
Other Adjustments(20)13 (1)(1)— — 
Balance at December 31, 2021$121 $42 $36 $21 $16 $4 $3 $15 
Write-Offs(158)(73)(70)(36)(34)— — (12)
Credit Loss Expense160 40 72 17 55 11 
Other Adjustments93 59 43 42 (1)— — — 
Balance at December 31, 2022$216 $68 $81 $44 $36 $6 $4 $14 
Trade and other receivables are evaluated based on an estimate of the risk of loss over the life of the receivable and current and historical conditions using supportable assumptions. Management evaluates the risk of loss for trade and other receivables by comparing the historical write-off amounts to total revenue over a specified period. Historical loss rates are adjusted due to the impact of current conditions, as well as forecasted conditions over a reasonable time period. The calculated write-off rate can be applied to the receivable balance for which an established reserve does not already exist. Management reviews the assumptions and risk of loss periodically for trade and other receivables.
197


FINANCIAL STATEMENTSREVENUE
UNBILLED REVENUEThe aging of trade receivables is presented in the table below.
December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unbilled Receivables(a)(b)
$1,457 $486 $355 $232 $123 $20 $28 $160 
Current2,347 577 1,059 637 417 15 52 265 
1-30 days past due261 96 60 15 45 17 15 
31-60 days past due123 23 61 49 12 
61-90 days past due74 25 18 11 
91+ days past due209 70 74 27 47 26 
Deferred Payment Arrangements(c)
160 57 62 35 27 — 
Trade and Other Receivables$4,631 $1,334 $1,689 $1,004 $680 $79 $116 $450 
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unbilled Receivables(a)(b)
$922 $316 $266 $193 $73 $$27 $106 
Current1,941 592 716 405 311 42 50 202 
1-30 days past due288 77 128 44 82 12 
31-60 days past due98 30 49 21 28 10 
61-90 days past due118 32 48 28 20 23 
91+ days past due161 84 37 28 24 
Deferred Payment Arrangements(c)
115 55 45 22 23 — 
Trade and Other Receivables$3,643 $1,186 $1,289 $722 $565 $100 $103 $333 
(a)    Unbilled revenues are recognized by applying customer billing rates to the estimated volumes of energy or natural gas delivered but not yet billed. Unbilled revenues can vary significantly from period to period as a result of seasonality, weather, customer usage patterns, customer mix, average price in effect for customer classes, timing of rendering customer billsbilled and meter reading schedules, and the impact of weather normalization or margin decoupling mechanisms.
Unbilled revenues are included within Receivables and Receivables of VIEs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as shown in the following table.
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
Duke Energy$843
 $896
Duke Energy Carolinas298
 313
Progress Energy217
 244
Duke Energy Progress122
 148
Duke Energy Florida95
 96
Duke Energy Ohio1
 2
Duke Energy Indiana16
 23
Piedmont78
 73

Sheets.
Additionally,(b)    Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana sell, on a revolving basis, nearly all of their retail accounts receivable, including receivables for unbilled revenues, to an affiliate, CRC, and account for the transfers of receivables as sales. Accordingly, the receivables sold are not reflected on the Consolidated Balance Sheets of Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana. See Note 18 for further information. These receivables for unbilled revenues are shown in the table below.$148 million and $260 million for Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively, as of December 31, 2022, and $82 million and $121 million for Duke Energy Ohio and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively, as of December 31, 2021.
 December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
Duke Energy Ohio$82
 $86
Duke Energy Indiana115
 128

(c)    Due to ongoing financial hardships impacting customers, Duke Energy has permitted customers to defer payment of past-due amounts through installment payment plans.
20. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income available to Duke Energy common stockholders, as adjusted for distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities and accumulated preferred dividends, by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS is computed by dividing net income available to Duke Energy common stockholders, as adjusted for distributed and undistributed earnings allocated to participating securities and accumulated preferred dividends, by the diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that could occur if securities or other agreements to issue common stock, such as stock options and equity forward sale agreements, were exercised or settled. Duke Energy’s participating securities are RSUs that are entitled to dividends declared on Duke Energy common stock during the RSUs vesting periods. Dividends declared on preferred stock are recorded on the Consolidated Statements of Operations as a reduction of net income to arrive at net income available to Duke Energy common stockholders. Dividends accumulated on preferred stock are a reductionan adjustment to net income used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.
198

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
The following table presents Duke Energy’s basic and diluted EPS calculations, the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and common and preferred share dividends declared.
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
(in millions, except per share amounts)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions, except per share amounts)202220212020
Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy common stockholders excluding impact of participating securities and including accumulated preferred stock dividends$3,694
 $2,642
 $3,059
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basic and diluted729
 708
 700
Net Income available to Duke Energy common stockholdersNet Income available to Duke Energy common stockholders$2,444 $3,802 $1,270 
Less: (Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholdersLess: (Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders(1,215)200 289 
Accumulated preferred stock dividends adjustmentAccumulated preferred stock dividends adjustment — 
Less: Impact of participating securitiesLess: Impact of participating securities2 
Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy common stockholdersIncome from continuing operations available to Duke Energy common stockholders$3,657 $3,599 $980 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of taxLoss from discontinued operations, net of tax$(1,323)$(144)$(7)
Add: Loss attributable to NCIAdd: Loss attributable to NCI108 344 296 
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders(Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders$(1,215)$200 $289 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – basicWeighted average common shares outstanding – basic770 769 737 
Equity forwardsEquity forwards— — 
Weighted average common shares outstanding – dilutedWeighted average common shares outstanding – diluted770 769 738 
EPS from continuing operations available to Duke Energy common stockholders     EPS from continuing operations available to Duke Energy common stockholders
Basic and diluted$5.07
 $3.73
 $4.37
Basic and DilutedBasic and Diluted$4.74 $4.68 $1.33 
(Loss) Earnings Per Share from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders(Loss) Earnings Per Share from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy common stockholders
Basic and Diluted Basic and Diluted$(1.57)$0.26 $0.39 
Potentially dilutive items excluded from the calculation(a)
2
 2
 2
Potentially dilutive items excluded from the calculation(a)
2 
Dividends declared per common share$3.75
 $3.64
 $3.49
Dividends declared per common share$3.98 $3.90 $3.82 
Dividends declared on Series A preferred stock per depositary share$1.03
 $
 $
Dividends declared on Series A preferred stock per depositary share(b)
Dividends declared on Series A preferred stock per depositary share(b)
$1.437 $1.437 $1.437 
Dividends declared on Series B preferred stock per share(c)
Dividends declared on Series B preferred stock per share(c)
$48.750 $48.750 $49.292 
(a)Performance stock awards were not included in the dilutive securities calculation because the performance measures related to the awards had not been met.
(a)    Performance stock awards were not included in the dilutive securities calculation because the performance measures related to the awards had not been met.
(b)    5.75% Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the 16th day of March, June, September and December. The preferred stock has a $25 liquidation preference per depositary share.
(c)    4.875% Series B Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock dividends are payable semiannually in arrears on the 16th day of March and September. The preferred stock has a $1,000 liquidation preference per share. On September 16, 2024, the First Call Date, and any fifth anniversary of the First Call Date, the dividend rate will reset based on the then current five-year U.S. Treasury rate plus a spread of 3.388%.
Common Stock
In February 2018, Duke Energy filed a prospectus supplement and executed an Equity Distribution Agreement (EDA) under which it may sell up to $1 billion of its common stock through an ATM offering program, including an equity forward sales component. Under the terms of the EDA, Duke Energy was allowed to issue and sell shares of common stock. The existing ATM offering program expired in September 2019.

209




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY


In June 2018, Duke Energy marketed two separate tranches, each for 1.3 million shares, of common stock through equity forward transactions under the ATM program. In December 2018, Duke Energy physically settled these equity forwards by delivering 2.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for net proceeds of approximately $195 million.
In March 2018, Duke Energy marketed an equity offering of 21.3 million shares of common stock through an Underwriting Agreement. In connection with the offering, Duke Energy entered into equity forward sale agreements. The equity forwards required Duke Energy to either physically settle the transactions by issuing 21.3 million shares in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreements, or net settle in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. In June 2018, Duke Energy physically settled one-half of the equity forwards by delivering approximately 10.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for net cash proceeds of approximately $781 million. In December 2018, Duke Energy physically settled the remaining equity forward by delivering 10.6 million shares of common stock in exchange for net cash proceeds of approximately $766 million.
In March and April 2019, Duke Energy marketed two separate tranches, each for 1.1 million shares, of common stock through equity forward transactions under the ATM program. The first tranche had an initial forward price of $89.83 per share and the second tranche had an initial forward price of $88.82 per share. In May and June 2019, a third tranche of 1.6 million shares of common stock was marketed and had an initial forward price of $86.23. The equity forwards required Duke Energy to either physically settle the transaction by issuing shares in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreements or net settle in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. The settlement alternative was at Duke Energy's election. In December 2019, Duke Energy physically settled the equity forwards by delivering 3.8 million shares of common stock in exchange for net cash proceeds of approximately $331 million.
In November 2019,2022, Duke Energy filed a prospectus supplement and executed an EDA under which it may sell up to $1.5 billion of its common stock through a new ATM offering program, including an equity forward sales component. Under the terms of the EDA, Duke Energy may issue and sell shares of common stock through September 2022.
In November 2019, Duke Energy marketed an equity offering of 28.75 million shares of common stock through an Underwriting Agreement. In connection with the offering, Duke Energy entered into equity forward sales agreements with an initial forward price of $85.99 per share. The equity forward sales agreements require Duke Energy to either physically settle the transaction by issuing shares in exchange for net proceeds at the then-applicable forward sale price specified by the agreement, or net settle in whole or in part through the delivery or receipt of cash or shares. The settlement alternatives are at Duke Energy's election. Settlement of the forward sales agreements are expected to occur on or prior to December 31, 2020. If Duke Energy had elected to net share settle these contracts as of December 31, 2019, Duke Energy would have been required to deliver 1.6 million shares.
For the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018, Duke Energy issued 1.8 million and 2.2 million shares, respectively, through its DRIP with an increase in additional paid-in capital of approximately $160 million and $174 million, respectively.2025.
Preferred Stock
On March 29, 2019, Duke Energy completed the issuance of 40 million depositary shares, each representing 1/1,000th share of its Series A Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, at a price of $25 per depositary share. The transaction resulted in net proceeds of $973 million after issuance costs with proceeds used for general corporate purposes and to reduce short-term debt. The preferred stock has a $25 liquidation preference per depositary share and earns dividends on a cumulative basis at a rate of 5.75% per annum. Dividends are payable quarterly in arrears on the 16th day of March, June, September and December, and began on June 16, 2019.
The Series A Preferred Stock has no maturity or mandatory redemption date, is not redeemable at the option of the holders and includes separate call options. The first call option allows Duke Energy to call the Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $25.50 per depositary share prior to June 15, 2024, in whole but not in part, at any time within 120 days after a ratings event where a rating agency amends, clarifies or changes the criteria it uses to assign equity credit for securities such as the preferred stock. The second call option allows Duke Energy to call the preferred stock, in whole or in part, at any time, on or after June 15, 2024, at a redemption price of $25 per depositary share. Duke Energy is also required to redeem all accumulated and unpaid dividends if either call option is exercised.
On September 12, 2019, Duke Energy completed the issuance of 1 million shares of its Series B Fixed-Rate Reset Cumulative Redeemable Perpetual Preferred Stock, at a price of $1,000 per share. The transaction resulted in net proceeds of $989 million after issuance costs with proceeds being used to pay down short-term debt, repay at maturity $500 million senior notes due September 2019, and for general corporate purposes. The preferred stock has a $1,000 liquidation preference per share and earns dividends on a cumulative basis at an initial rate of 4.875% per annum. Dividends are payable semiannually in arrears on the 16th day of March and September, beginning on March 16, 2020. On September 16, 2024, the First Call Date, and any fifth anniversary of the First Call Date (each a Reset Date), the dividend rate will reset based on the then current five-year U.S. treasury rate plus a spread of 3.388%.
The Series B Preferred Stock has no maturity or mandatory redemption date, is not redeemable at the option of the holders and includes separate call options. The first call option allows Duke Energy to call the Series B Preferred Stock at a redemption price of $1,020 per share, in whole but not in part, at any time within 120 days after a ratings event. The second call option allows Duke Energy to call the preferred stock, in whole or in part, on the First Call Date or any subsequent Reset Date at a redemption price in cash equal to $1,000 per share. Duke Energy is also required to redeem all accumulated and unpaid dividends if either call option is exercised.
Dividends issued on its Series A and Series B Preferred Stock are subject to approval by the Board of Directors. However, the deferral of dividend payments on the preferred stock prohibits the declaration of common stock dividends.

210




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY


The Series A and Series B Preferred Stock rank, with respect to dividends and distributions upon liquidation or dissolution:
senior to Common Stock and to each other class or series of capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock that is expressly made subordinated to the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock;
on a parity with any class or series of capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock that is not expressly made senior or subordinated to the Series A or Series B Preferred Stock;
199

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
junior to any class or series of capital stock established after the original issue date of the Series A and Series B Preferred Stock that is expressly made senior to the Series A or Series B Preferred Stock;
junior to all existing and future indebtedness (including indebtedness outstanding under Duke Energy's credit facilities, unsecured senior notes, junior subordinated debentures and commercial paper) and other liabilities with respect to assets available to satisfy claims against Duke Energy; and
structurally subordinated to existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of Duke Energy's subsidiaries and future preferred stock of subsidiaries.
Holders of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock have no voting rights with respect to matters that generally require the approval of voting stockholders. The limited voting rights of holders of Series A and Series B Preferred Stock include the right to vote as a single class, respectively, on certain matters that may affect the preference or special rights of the preferred stock, except in the instance that Duke Energy elects to defer the payment of dividends for a total of six quarterly full dividend periods for Series A Preferred Stock or three semiannual full dividend periods for Series B Preferred Stock. If dividends are deferred for a cumulative total of six quarterly full dividend periods for Series A Preferred Stock or three semiannual full dividend periods for Series B Preferred Stock, whether or not for consecutive dividend periods, holders of the respective preferred stock have the right to elect two additional Board members to the Board of Directors.
21. SEVERANCE
During 2022, Duke Energy identified opportunities to eliminate work and create sustainable savings through a workload reduction initiative with a focus on process improvement through digital technology, governance simplification and elimination of low-value work. As a result, Duke Energy extended involuntary severance benefits to certain employees in specific areas as a part of this initiative.
During 2021, Duke Energy reviewed its operations and identified opportunities for improvement to better serve its customers. This operational review included workforce realignment to ensure the company is staffed with the right skill sets and number of teammates to execute the long-term vision for Duke Energy. As such, Duke Energy extended involuntary severance benefits to certain employees in specific areas as a part of these workforce realignment efforts.
During 2020, as a result of partial settlements between Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and the Public Staff, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Progress deferred as Regulatory assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, approximately $65 million and $33 million, respectively, of previously recorded severance charges within Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. These severance charges were previously recorded during 2018, as Duke Energy reviewed its operations and identified opportunities for improvement to better serve its customers. This operational review included the company's workforce strategy and staffing levels to ensure the company was staffed with the right skillsetsskill sets and number of teammates to execute the long-term vision for Duke Energy. As such, Duke Energy extended voluntary and involuntary severance benefits to certain employees in specific areas as a part of workforce planning and digital transformation efforts.
The following table presents the direct and allocated severance and related charges accrued for approximately 140233 employees in 2019, 1,9002022, 290 employees in 20182021 and 100 employees30 employees in 20172020, by the Duke Energy Registrants within Operation, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Year Ended December 31, 2019$16
$8
$6
$3
$3
$
$1
$1
Year Ended December 31, 2018187
102
69
52
17
6
7
2
Year Ended December 31, 201715
2
2
1
1

1
9

DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Year Ended December 31, 2022(a)(b)
$65 $40 $20 $17 $3 $1 $2 $2 
Year Ended December 31, 2021(c)(d)
69 33 26 20 
Year Ended December 31, 2020(e)(f)
(85)(58)(28)(31)— — — 
(a)    Includes amortization of deferred severance charges of approximately $33 million, $22 million, $11 million and $11 million for Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(b)    Includes adjustments associated with 2021 severance charges of approximately $(19) million, $(6) million, $(8) million, $(4) million, $(4) million, $(1) million, $(2) million and $(1) million for Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont, respectively.
(c)    Includes amortization of deferred severance charges of approximately $33 million, $22 million, $11 million and $11 million for Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(d)    Includes adjustments associated with 2018 severance charges of approximately $(3) million, $(2) million and $(1) million for Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas and Duke Energy Indiana, respectively.
(e)    Includes unamortized deferred severance charges of approximately $(86) million, $(57) million, $(29) million and $(29) million for Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
(f)    Includes adjustments associated with 2018 severance charges of approximately $(6) million, $(2) million, $(3) million and $(2) million for Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress, respectively.
200

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSEVERANCE
The table below presents the severance liability for past and ongoing severance plans including the plans described above.
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Balance at December 31, 2018$205
$100
$51
$41
$9
$2
$2
$
Provision/Adjustments24
4
11
2
10
1
1

Cash Reductions(188)(93)(49)(37)(12)(2)(1)
Balance at December 31, 2019$41
$11
$13
$6
$7
$1
$2
$

DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Balance at December 31, 2020$11 $$$$$— $$— 
Provision/Adjustments36 — — — — 
Cash Reductions(8)(1)(2)(1)(1)— (1)— 
Balance at December 31, 2021$39 $$$$$— $— $— 
Provision/Adjustments33 14 4 3 1   1 
Cash Reductions(8)(1)      
Balance at December 31, 2022$64 $15 $6 $4 $2 $ $ $1 
22. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The Duke Energy Corporation 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan (the 2015 Plan) provides for the grant of stock-based compensation awards to employees and outside directors. The 2015 Plan reservesreserved 10 million shares of common stock for issuance. Duke Energy has historically issued new shares upon exercising or vesting of share-based awards. However, Duke Energy may use a combination of new share issuances and open market repurchases for share-based awards that are exercised or vest in the future. Duke Energy has not determined with certainty the amount of such new share issuances or open market repurchases.

211




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


The following table summarizes the total expense recognized by the Duke Energy Registrants, net of tax, for stock-based compensation.
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
(in millions)202220212020
Duke Energy$65
 $56
 $43
Duke Energy$74 $64 $61 
Duke Energy Carolinas24
 20
 15
Duke Energy Carolinas27 23 22 
Progress Energy24
 21
 16
Progress Energy27 24 23 
Duke Energy Progress15
 13
 10
Duke Energy Progress17 15 15 
Duke Energy Florida9
 8
 6
Duke Energy Florida10 
Duke Energy Ohio5
 4
 3
Duke Energy Ohio5 
Duke Energy Indiana6
 5
 4
Duke Energy Indiana7 
Piedmont3
 3
 3
Piedmont4 
Duke Energy's pretax stock-based compensation costs, the tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense and stock-based compensation costs capitalized are included in the following table.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019
 2018
 2017
RSU awards$44
 $43
 $41
Performance awards45
 35
 27
Pretax stock-based compensation cost$89
 $78
 $68
Stock-based compensation costs capitalized5
 5
 4
Stock-based compensation expense$84
 $73
 $64
Tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense$19
 $17
 $25

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
RSU awards$58 $49 $46 
Performance awards42 39 38 
Pretax stock-based compensation cost$100 $88 $84 
Stock-based compensation costs capitalized5 
Stock-based compensation expense$95 $83 $79 
Tax benefit associated with stock-based compensation expense$21 $19 $18 
RESTRICTED STOCK UNIT AWARDS
RSU awards generally vest over periods from immediate to three years. Fair value amounts are based on the market price of Duke Energy's common stock on the grant date. The following table includes information related to RSU awards.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019
 2018
 2017
Shares granted (in thousands)571
 649
 583
Fair value (in millions)$51
 $49
 $47

 Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Shares granted (in thousands)654 673 498 
Fair value (in millions)$64 $59 $50 
201

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
The following table summarizes information about RSU awards outstanding.
   Weighted Average
 Shares
 Grant Date Fair Value
 (in thousands)
 (per share)
Outstanding at December 31, 20181,153
 $77
Granted571
 89
Vested(631) 77
Forfeited(83) 82
Outstanding at December 31, 20191,010
 83
RSU awards expected to vest951
 83

Weighted Average
SharesGrant Date Fair Value
 (in thousands)(per share)
Outstanding at December 31, 20211,043 $92 
Granted654 98 
Vested(527)93 
Forfeited(73)94 
Outstanding at December 31, 20221,097 95 
RSU awards expected to vest1,056 95 
The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, was $49 million, $43$45 million and $42$43 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy had $30$34 million of unrecognized compensation cost, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 23 months. Prior to Duke Energy's acquisition of Piedmont, Piedmont had an incentive compensation plan that had a series of three-year performance and RSU awards for eligible officers and other participants. The 2016-2018 performance award cycle was approved subsequent to the Agreement and Plan of Merger between Duke Energy and Piedmont and was converted into a Duke Energy RSU award at the consummation of the acquisition.
PERFORMANCE AWARDS
Stock-based performance awards generally vest after three years ifto the extent performance targets are met. The actual number of shares issued will range from zero to 200% of target shares, depending on the level of performance achieved.

212




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSSTOCK-BASED COMPENSATION


Performance awards contain performance conditions and a market condition. The performance conditions are based on Duke Energy's cumulative adjusted EPS and total incident case rate (total incident case rate is one of our key employee safety metrics). The market condition is based on TSR of Duke Energy relative to a predefined peer group.
Relative TSR is valued using a path-dependent model that incorporates expected relative TSR into the fair value determination of Duke Energy’s performance-based share awards. The model uses three-year historical volatilities and correlations for all companies in the predefined peer group, including Duke Energy, to simulate Duke Energy’s relative TSR as of the end of the performance period. For each simulation, Duke Energy’s relative TSR associated with the simulated stock price at the end of the performance period plus expected dividends within the period results in a value per share for the award portfolio. The average of these simulations is the expected portfolio value per share. Actual life to date results of Duke Energy’s relative TSR for each grant are incorporated within the model. For performance awards granted in 2019,2022, the model used a risk-free interest rate of 2.5%1.78%, which reflects the yield on three-year Treasury bonds as of the grant date, and an expected volatility of 14.8%26.8% based on Duke Energy's historical volatility over three years using daily stock prices.
The following table includes information related to stock-based performance awards.
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019
 2018
 2017
Shares granted assuming target performance (in thousands)320
 372
 461
Fair value (in millions)$27
 $27
 $37

 Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Shares granted assuming target performance (in thousands)408 380 319 
Fair value (in millions)$40 $33 $34 
The following table summarizes information about stock-based performance awards outstanding and assumes payout at the target level.
   Weighted Average
 Shares
 Grant Date Fair Value
 (in thousands)
 (per share)
Outstanding at December 31, 20181,117
 $77
Granted320
 86
Vested(310) 75
Forfeited(18) 81
Outstanding at December 31, 20191,109
 80
Stock-based performance awards expected to vest1,080
 80

Weighted Average
SharesGrant Date Fair Value
 (in thousands)(per share)
Outstanding at December 31, 2021952 $93 
Granted408 99 
Vested(297)86 
Forfeited(30)96 
Outstanding at December 31, 20221,033 97 
Stock-based performance awards expected to vest1,006 97 
The total grant date fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, was $23$25 million and $13$25 million, respectively. NaN performance awards vested during the year ended December 31, 2017. At December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy had $27$22 million of unrecognized compensation cost, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 22 months.
202

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
23. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
DEFINED BENEFIT RETIREMENT PLANS
Duke Energy and certain subsidiaries maintain, and the Subsidiary Registrants participate in, qualified, non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans. Theplans, which consist of the Duke Energy Retirement Cash Balance Plan (RCBP), which is an active plan, and the Duke Energy Legacy Pension Plan (DELPP), which is an inactive plan. These plans cover most employees using a cash balance formula. Under a cash balance formula, a plan participant accumulates a retirement benefit consisting of pay credits based upon a percentage of current eligible earnings, age or age and years of service and interest credits. Certain employees are eligible for benefits that use a final average earnings formula. Under these final average earnings formulas, a plan participant accumulates a retirement benefit equal to the sum of percentages of their (i) highest three-year, four-year,three-, four-, or five-year average earnings, (ii) highest three-year, four-year,three-, four-, or five-year average earnings in excess of covered compensation per year of participation (maximum of 35 years) or (iii) highest three-year average earnings times years of participation in excess of 35 years. Duke Energy also maintains, and the Subsidiary Registrants participate in, non-qualified, non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans that cover certain executives. The qualified and non-qualified, non-contributory defined benefit plans are closed to new participants.
Duke Energy approved plan amendments to restructure its qualified non-contributory defined benefit retirement plans, effective January 1, 2018. The restructuring involved (i) the spin-off of the majority of inactive participants from two plans into a separate inactive plan and (ii) the merger of the active participant portions of such plans, along with a pension plan acquired as part of the Piedmont transaction, into a single active plan. Benefits offered to the plan participants remain unchanged except that the Piedmont plan's final average earnings formula was frozen as of December 31, 2017, and affected participants were moved into the active plan's cash balance formula. Actuarial gains and losses associated with the Inactive Plan will be amortized over the remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants. The longer amortization period lowered Duke Energy's 2018 pretax qualified pension plan expense by approximately $33 million.
Duke Energy uses a December 31 measurement date for its defined benefit retirement plan assets and obligations. Actuarial losses experienced by the defined benefit retirement plans in remeasuring plan assets on December 31, 2022, were primarily attributable to actual investment performance that was less than expected investment performance. Actuarial gains experienced by the defined benefit retirement plans in remeasuring plan obligations as of December 31, 2022, were primarily attributable to the increase in the discount rate used to measure plan obligations. Actuarial losses experienced by the defined benefit retirement plans in remeasuring plan assets as of December 31, 2021, were primarily attributable to actual investment performance that was less than expected investment performance. Actuarial gains experienced by the defined benefit retirement plans in remeasuring plan obligations as of December 31, 2021, were primarily attributable to the increase in the discount rate used to measure plan obligations.
As a result of the application of settlement accounting due to total lump-sum benefit payments exceeding the settlement threshold (defined as the sum of the service cost and interest cost on projected benefit obligation components of net periodic pensionbenefit costs) for one of its qualified pension plans, Duke Energy recognized settlement charges of $94$117 million, primarily as a regulatory assetof which $95 million was recorded to Regulatory Assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and $22 million was recorded to Other Income and Expenses, net, within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations as of December 31, 2019 (an immaterial amount was recorded in Other income and expenses, net within the Consolidated Statement of Operations).

213




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


2022.
Settlement charges recognized by the Subsidiary Registrants as of December 31, 2019,2022, which represent amounts allocated by Duke Energy for employees of the Subsidiary Registrants and allocated charges for their proportionate share of settlement charges for employees of Duke Energy’sEnergy's shared services affiliate, and recorded to Regulatory Assets within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets were $53$35 million for Duke Energy Carolinas, $26$23 million for Progress Energy, $20$16 million for Duke Energy Progress, $6$7 million for Duke Energy Florida, $4$8 million for Duke Energy Indiana $2and $29 million for Piedmont. Settlement charges recognized by the Subsidiary Registrants as of December 31, 2022, recorded to Other Income and Expenses, net, within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations were $3 million for Duke Energy Carolinas, $5 million for Progress Energy, $5 million for Duke Energy Progress, $1 million for Duke Energy Florida, $5 million for Duke Energy Ohio and $8$6 million for Piedmont.
The settlement charges reflect the recognition of a pro-rata portion of previously unrecognized actuarial losses, equal to the percentage of reduction in the projected benefit obligation resulting from total lump-sumlump-sum benefit payments as of December 31, 2019.2022. Settlement charges recognized as a regulatory asset within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets are amortized over the average remaining service period for participants in the plan. Amortization of settlement charges is disclosed in the tables below as a component of net periodic pension costs.
Effective December 31, 2022, Duke Energy Florida changed its method for calculating the market related value of plan assets (MRVA) from the fair value method to a method that recognizes changes in fair value of its plan assets over a five-year period. This represents a change in regulatory treatment that will serve to mitigate the impact of market volatility on retail customer rates, resulting in the timing of net periodic pension cost recognition that is more consistent with treatment of the related cost in the ratemaking process. The three-year retrospective impact of this method change of $24 million was recognized by Duke Energy, Progress Energy and Duke Energy Florida, respectively, and was recorded to Other Income and Expenses, net, within the Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and has been disclosed in the tables below as a component of net periodic pension costs.
Net periodic benefit costs disclosed in the tables below represent the cost of the respective benefit plan for the periods presented prior to capitalization of amounts reflected as Net property, plant and equipment, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Only the service cost component of net periodic benefit costs is eligible to be capitalized. The remaining non-capitalized portions of net periodic benefit costs are classified as either: (1) service cost, which is recorded in Operations, maintenance and other on the Consolidated Statements of Operations; or as (2) components of non-service cost, which is recorded in Other income and expenses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Amounts presented in the tables below for the Subsidiary Registrants represent the amounts of pension and other post-retirement benefit cost allocated by Duke Energy for employees of the Subsidiary Registrants. Additionally, the Consolidated Statements of Operations of the Subsidiary Registrants also include allocated net periodic benefit costs for their proportionate share of pension and post-retirement benefit cost for employees of Duke Energy’s shared services affiliate that provide support to the Subsidiary Registrants. However, in the tables below, these amounts are only presented within the Duke Energy column (except for amortization of settlement charges). These allocated amounts are included in the governance and shared service costs discussed in Note 14.
203

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Duke Energy’s policy is to fund amounts on an actuarial basis to provide assets sufficient to meet benefit payments to be paid to plan participants. Duke Energy does not anticipate making any contributions in 2020. The following table includes information related to the Duke Energy Registrants’ contributions to its qualified defined benefit pension plans.
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Contributions Made:  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
2019$77
 $7
 $57
 $4
 $53
 $2
 $2
 $1
2018141
 46
 45
 25
 20
 
 8
 
201719
 
 
 
 
 4
 
 11

There were no contributions made in the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020.

214




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Contributions Made:
2022$58 $15 $13 $8 $5 $3 $5 $2 
QUALIFIED PENSION PLANS
Components of Net Periodic Pension Costs
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Service cost  $158
 $49
 $46
 $26
 $20
 $4
 $9
 $5
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation  317
 75
 100
 45
 54
 18
 26
 10
Expected return on plan assets  (567) (147) (178) (88) (89) (28) (43) (22)
Amortization of actuarial loss  108
 24
 39
 15
 24
 4
 8
 8
Amortization of prior service credit(32) (8) (3) (2) (1) 
 (2) (9)
Amortization of settlement charges6
 2
 1
 1
 
 2
 
 
Net periodic pension costs(a)(b)
$(10)
$(5) $5
 $(3) $8
 $
 $(2) $(8)
Year Ended December 31, 2018Year Ended December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Service cost $182
 $58
 $51
 $29
 $22
 $5
 $11
 $7
Service cost$152 $48 $43 $25 $17 $4 $9 $5 
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 299
 72
 94
 43
 50
 17
 23
 11
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation249 59 77 35 41 13 20 8 
Expected return on plan assets (559) (147) (178) (85) (91) (28) (42) (22)Expected return on plan assets(558)(152)(183)(88)(94)(23)(37)(24)
Amortization of actuarial loss 132
 29
 44
 21
 23
 5
 10
 11
Amortization of actuarial loss81 16 23 12 12 4 9 5 
Amortization of prior service credit(32) (8) (3) (2) (1) 
 (2) (10)Amortization of prior service credit(18)(3)    (2)(7)
Amortization of settlement charges(c)
Amortization of settlement charges(c)
32 9 8 7 1 5 1 7 
MRVA method changeMRVA method change24 — 24 — 24 — — — 
Net periodic pension costs(a)(b)
$22
 $4
 $8
 $6
 $3
 $(1) $
 $(3)
Net periodic pension costs(a)(b)
$(38)$(23)$(8)$(9)$1 $3 $ $(6)
Year Ended December 31, 2017Year Ended December 31, 2021
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Service cost $159
 $48
 $45
 $26
 $19
 $4
 $9
 $10
Service cost$176 $56 $50 $29 $21 $$10 $
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation 328
 79
 100
 47
 53
 18
 26
 14
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation220 51 70 30 39 13 18 
Expected return on plan assets (545) (142) (167) (82) (85) (27) (42) (24)Expected return on plan assets(558)(141)(187)(84)(102)(28)(40)(20)
Amortization of actuarial loss 146
 31
 52
 23
 29
 5
 12
 11
Amortization of actuarial loss133 29 38 18 20 13 10 
Amortization of prior service credit(24) (8) (3) (2) (1) (1) (2) (2)Amortization of prior service credit(29)(8)(2)(1)(1)(1)(2)(9)
Settlement charge12
 
 
 
 
 
 
 12
Other 8
 2
 2
 1
 1
 
 1
 1
Amortization of settlement chargesAmortization of settlement charges— — 
Net periodic pension costs(a)(b)
$84
 $10
 $29
 $13
 $16
 $(1) $4
 $22
Net periodic pension costs(a)(b)
$(49)$(8)$(29)$(6)$(22)$(4)$(1)$(5)

Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Service cost$165 $51 $48 $27 $21 $$$
Interest cost on projected benefit obligation269 62 85 38 46 15 22 
Expected return on plan assets(572)(145)(190)(87)(101)(28)(42)(21)
Amortization of actuarial loss128 28 41 18 23 12 
Amortization of prior service credit(32)(8)(3)(2)(1)— (2)(9)
Amortization of settlement charges(c)
18 — 
Net periodic pension costs(a)(b)
$(24)$(3)$(12)$— $(11)$(2)$— $(5)
(a)Duke Energy amounts exclude $4 million, $5 million and $7 million for the years ended December 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
(b)Duke Energy Ohio amounts exclude $2 million, $2 million and $3 million for the years ended December 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.

(a)    Duke Energy amounts exclude $3 million, $3 million and $4 million for the years ended December 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
(b)    Duke Energy Ohio amounts exclude $1 million, $1 million and $2 million for the years ended December 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
(c)    Includes settlement charges not deferred as a regulatory asset.
215
204




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Regulatory assets, net increase (decrease)$(212) $(156) $(79) $(59) $(20) $12
 $22
 $
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)               
Deferred income tax expense (benefit)$20
 
 1
 
 (1) 
 
 
Amortization of prior year service credit1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior year actuarial losses  (15) 
 (2) 
 3
 
 
 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income  $6
 $
 $(1) $
 $2
 $
 $
 $
  Year Ended December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Regulatory assets, net increase$298
 $170
 $40
 $31
 $9
 $10
 $30
 $8
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss    
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
Deferred income tax expense$(2) $
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Prior year service credit arising during the year  1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of prior year actuarial losses  10
 
 (4) 
 
 
 
 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income  $9
 $
 $(3) $
 $
 $
 $
 $

Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Regulatory assets, net increase (decrease)$367 $221 $107 $101 $5 $(1)$(12)$9 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)
Deferred income tax expense$(7)$ $(1)$ $ $ $ $ 
Amortization of prior year service credit        
Amortization of prior year actuarial losses37  2      
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income$30 $ $1 $ $ $ $ $ 

Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Regulatory assets, net decrease$(261)$(57)$(128)$(31)$(97)$(17)$(19)$(5)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss (income)
Deferred income tax expense$$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Amortization of prior year service credit— — — — — — — 
Amortization of prior year actuarial losses(8)— (1)— — — — — 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income$(6)$— $(1)$— $— $— $— $— 
216




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


Reconciliation of Funded Status to Net Amount Recognized
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation  
  
                    
Obligation at prior measurement date  $7,869
 $1,954
 $2,433
 $1,125
 $1,295
 $435
 $618
 $264
Service cost  150
 47
 43
 25
 18
 4
 8
 5
Interest cost  317
 75
 100
 45
 54
 18
 26
 10
Actuarial loss716
 101
 223
 87
 135
 54
 87
 33
Transfers  
 11
 
 
 
 
 
 
Benefits paid  (731) (265) (191) (112) (78) (30) (46) (20)
Obligation at measurement date  $8,321

$1,923

$2,608

$1,170

$1,424

$481

$693
 $292
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at measurement date  $8,262
 $1,923
 $2,578
 $1,170
 $1,392
 $471
 $686
 $292
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
Plan assets at prior measurement date  
$8,233
 $2,168
 $2,606
 $1,268
 $1,322
 $405
 $611
 $305
Employer contributions77
 7
 57
 4
 53
 2
 2
 1
Actual return on plan assets  1,331
 342
 426
 204
 218
 66
 100
 49
Benefits paid  (731) (265) (191) (112)
(78)
(30)
(46) (20)
Transfers  
 11
 
 






 
Plan assets at measurement date  $8,910
 $2,263
 $2,898
 $1,364
 $1,515
 $443
 $667
 $335
Funded status of plan  $589
 $340
 $290
 $194
 $91
 $(38) $(26) $43
  Year Ended December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation  
                     
Obligation at prior measurement date  $8,448
 $2,029
 $2,637
 $1,211
 $1,410
 $479
 $669
 $313
Service cost  174
 56
 49
 28
 21
 5
 10
 7
Interest cost  299
 72
 94
 43
 50
 17
 23
 11
Actuarial gain(485) (44) (204) (87) (114) (29) (29) (18)
Transfers  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (16)
Benefits paid  (567) (159) (143) (70) (72) (37) (55) (33)
Obligation at measurement date  $7,869
 $1,954
 $2,433
 $1,125
 $1,295
 $435
 $618
 $264
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at measurement date  
$7,818
 $1,954
 $2,404
 $1,125
 $1,265
 $425
 $614
 $264
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
Plan assets at prior measurement date  $9,003
 $2,372
 $2,814
 $1,366
 $1,429
 $458
 $684
 $368
Employer contributions141
 46
 45
 25
 20
 
 8
 
Actual return on plan assets  (344) (91) (110) (53) (55) (16) (26) (14)
Benefits paid  (567) (159) (143) (70) (72) (37) (55) (33)
Transfers  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (16)
Plan assets at measurement date  $8,233
 $2,168
 $2,606
 $1,268
 $1,322
 $405
 $611
 $305
Funded status of plan  $364
 $214
 $173
 $143
 $27
 $(30) $(7) $41


Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Obligation at prior measurement date$8,207 $1,903 $2,560 $1,153 $1,392 $450 $680 $273 
Service cost145 47 40 24 16 4 8 5 
Interest cost249 59 77 35 41 13 20 8 
Actuarial gain(1,490)(301)(513)(197)(312)(84)(143)(47)
Benefits paid(753)(159)(184)(101)(82)(50)(66)(69)
Transfers 5 (5)(5)    
Obligation at measurement date$6,358 $1,554 $1,975 $909 $1,055 $333 $499 $170 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at measurement date$6,324 $1,556 $1,959 $910 $1,038 $327 $495 $170 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
Plan assets at prior measurement date$9,235 $2,365 $3,053 $1,421 $1,610 $438 $669 $334 
Employer contributions58 15 13 8 5 3 5 2 
Actual return on plan assets(1,547)(411)(506)(240)(262)(68)(107)(64)
Benefits paid(753)(159)(184)(101)(82)(50)(66)(69)
Transfers 5 (5)(5)    
Plan assets at measurement date$6,993 $1,815 $2,371 $1,083 $1,271 $323 $501 $203 
Funded status of plan$635 $261 $396 $174 $216 $(10)$2 $33 
217
205




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Obligation at prior measurement date$8,634 $1,988 $2,715 $1,193 $1,507 $502 $715 $293 
Service cost168 54 48 28 20 
Interest cost220 51 70 30 39 13 18 
Actuarial gain(200)(42)(108)(18)(89)(10)(10)(5)
Benefits paid(615)(148)(161)(80)(81)(50)(52)(28)
Transfers— — (4)— (4)(10)— — 
Obligation at measurement date$8,207 $1,903 $2,560 $1,153 $1,392 $450 $680 $273 
Accumulated Benefit Obligation at measurement date$8,144 $1,904 $2,529 $1,154 $1,361 $439 $672 $274 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
Plan assets at prior measurement date$9,337 $2,381 $3,049 $1,422 $1,605 $472 $684 $343 
Actual return on plan assets513 132 169 79 90 26 37 19 
Benefits paid(615)(148)(161)(80)(81)(50)(52)(28)
Transfers— — (4)— (4)(10)— — 
Plan assets at measurement date$9,235 $2,365 $3,053 $1,421 $1,610 $438 $669 $334 
Funded status of plan$1,028 $462 $493 $268��$218 $(12)$(11)$61 

Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
  December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Prefunded pension(a)
$621
 $340
 $322
 $194
 $123
 $38
 $57
 $43
Noncurrent pension liability(b)
$32
 $
 $32
 $
 $32
 $76
 $83
 $
Net asset (liability) recognized  $589

$340

$290

$194

$91

$(38)
$(26) $43
Regulatory assets  $1,972
 $420
 $717
 $313
 $404
 $112
 $204
 $81
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Deferred income tax benefit$(23) $
 $(1) $
 $(1) $
 $
 $
Prior service credit  (3) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial loss  111
 
 3
 
 3
 
 
 
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss$85
 $
 $2
 $
 $2
 $
 $
 $
Amounts to be recognized in net periodic pension costs in the next year    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Unrecognized net actuarial loss  $135
 $29
 $43
 $19
 $24
 $7
 $10
 $9
Unrecognized prior service credit  
(32) (8) (3) (2) (1) (1) (2) (9)
  December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Prefunded pension(a)
$433
 $214
 $242
 $143
 $96
 $24
 $39
 $41
Noncurrent pension liability(b)
$69
 $
 $69
 $
 $69
 $54
 $46
 $
Net asset recognized  $364
 $214
 $173
 $143
 $27
 $(30) $(7) $41
Regulatory assets  $2,184
 $576
 $796
 $372
 $424
 $100
 $182
 $81
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss    
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
Deferred income tax benefit$(43) $
 $(2) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Prior service credit  (4) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial loss  126
 
 5
 
 
 
 
 
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss$79
 $
 $3
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Amounts to be recognized in net periodic pension costs in the next year               
Unrecognized net actuarial loss$97
 $22
 $37
 $13
 $24
 $3
 $5
 $7
Unrecognized prior service credit$(32) $(8) $(3) $(2) $(1) $
 $(2) $(9)

(a)Included in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(b)Included in Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Prefunded pension(a)
$885 $261 $396 $174 $216 $62 $90 $33 
Noncurrent pension liability(b)
$250 $ $ $ $ $72 $88 $ 
Net asset (liability) recognized$635 $261 $396 $174 $216 $(10)$2 $33 
Regulatory assets$2,016 $545 $670 $353 $316 $92 $178 $84 
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss 
Deferred income tax benefit$(27)$ $(1)$ $ $ $ $ 
Prior service credit(1)       
Net actuarial loss129  3      
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss$101 $ $2 $ $ $ $ $ 
218
206




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Prefunded pension(a)
$1,071 $462 $494 $268 $219 $74 $100 $61 
Noncurrent pension liability(b)
$43 $— $$— $$86 $111 $— 
Net asset (liability) recognized$1,028 $462 $493 $268 $218 $(12)$(11)$61 
Regulatory assets$1,649 $324 $563 $252 $311 $93 $190 $75 
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
Deferred income tax benefit$(20)$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Prior service credit(1)— — — — — — — 
Net actuarial loss92 — — — — — — 
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss$71 $— $$— $— $— $— $— 

(a)    Included in Other within Other Noncurrent Assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
(b)    Included in Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Information for Plans with Accumulated Benefit Obligation in Excess of Plan Assets
  December 31, 2019
 Duke
Duke
 Energy
Energy
(in millions)  Ohio
Indiana
Projected benefit obligation  $155
$260
Accumulated benefit obligation  146
252
Fair value of plan assets  79
177
December 31, 2018December 31, 2022
 Duke
Duke
Duke
DukeDuke
Duke
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
DukeEnergyEnergy
(in millions) Energy
Energy
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
(in millions)EnergyOhioIndiana
Projected benefit obligation $679
$679
$679
$123
$203
Projected benefit obligation$3,323 $103 $198 
Accumulated benefit obligation 651
651
651
115
199
Accumulated benefit obligation3,288 99 193 
Fair value of plan assets 610
610
610
69
159
Fair value of plan assets3,073 31 110 

December 31, 2021
DukeDuke
EnergyEnergy
(in millions)OhioIndiana
Projected benefit obligation$153 $284 
Accumulated benefit obligation143 275 
Fair value of plan assets67 173 
Assumptions Used for Pension Benefits Accounting
The discount rate used to determine the current year pension obligation and following year’s pension expense is based on a bond selection-settlement portfolio approach. This approach develops a discount rate by selecting a portfolio of high qualityhigh-quality corporate bonds that generate sufficient cash flow to provide for projected benefit payments of the plan. The selected bond portfolio is derived from a universe of non-callable corporate bonds rated Aa quality or higher. After the bond portfolio is selected, a single interest rate is determined that equates the present value of the plan’s projected benefit payments discounted at this rate with the market value of the bonds selected.
The average remaining service period for participants in active plans and life expectancy of participants in inactive plans is 13 years for Duke Energy and Duke Energy Progress, 15 years for Duke Energy Florida and Duke Energy Ohio, 14 years for Progress Energy and Duke Energy Indiana, 12 years for Duke Energy Duke Energy Carolinas Progress Energy and Duke Energy Florida, 13 years for Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Indiana and Duke Energy Ohio, and 9nine years for Piedmont.
207

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The following tables present the assumptions or range of assumptions used for pension benefit accounting.
   December 31,
   2019 2018 2017
Benefit Obligations               
Discount rate     3.30%   4.30%   3.60%
Salary increase 3.50%4.00% 3.50%4.00% 3.50%4.00%
Net Periodic Benefit Cost               
Discount rate     4.30%   3.60% 

 4.10%
Salary increase  
 3.50%4.00% 3.50%4.00% 4.00%4.50%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets   

 6.85% 

 6.50% 6.50%6.75%

December 31,
202220212020
Benefit Obligations
Discount rate5.60%2.90%2.60%
Interest crediting rate4.35%4.00%4.00%
Salary increase3.50 %4.00%3.50 %4.00%3.50 %4.00%
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Discount rate2.90 %5.70%2.60%3.30%
Interest crediting rate4.00%4.00%4.00%
Salary increase3.50 %4.00%3.50 %4.00%3.50 %4.00%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.50%6.50%6.85%
Expected Benefit Payments
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Years ending December 31,                 
2020$643
$167
$169
$89
$79
$37
$50
$28
2021653
171
178
95
82
37
50
24
2022649
177
176
92
84
37
49
22
2023649
174
182
95
86
36
48
21
2024638
168
184
96
87
35
48
20
2025-20292,851
714
871
419
448
156
220
87


219




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Years ending December 31,
2023$661 $186 $183 $99 $83 $32 $45 $19 
2024635 176 180 95 84 31 45 18 
2025629 174 183 97 85 31 44 16 
2026607 164 180 91 87 30 44 16 
2027592 156 177 89 87 29 43 15 
2028-20322,581 628 804 372 427 135 205 71 
NON-QUALIFIED PENSION PLANS
The accumulated benefit obligation, which equals the projected benefit obligation for non-qualified pension plans, was $318$232 million for Duke Energy, $15$10 million for Duke Energy Carolinas, $110$78 million for Progress Energy, $24 million for Duke Energy Progress, $32 million for Duke Energy Progress, $45 million for Duke Energy Florida, $4$3 million for Duke Energy Ohio, $3$2 million for Duke Energy Indiana and $4$3 million for Piedmont as of December 31, 2019.2022.
Employer contributions, which equal benefits paid for non-qualified pension plans, were $25$24 million for Duke Energy, $2$1 million for Duke Energy Carolinas, $9$10 million for Progress Energy, $3 million for Duke Energy Progress and $3$4 million for Duke Energy Florida for the year ended December 31, 2019.2022. Employer contributions were not material for Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana or Piedmont for the year ended December 31, 2019.2022.
Net periodic pension costs for non-qualified pension plans were not material for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 2017.2020.
OTHER POST-RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS
Duke Energy provides, and the Subsidiary Registrants participate in, some health care and life insurance benefits for retired employees on a contributory and non-contributory basis. Employees are eligible for these benefits if they have met age and service requirements at retirement, as defined in the plans. The health care benefits include medical, dental, vision and prescription drug coverage and are subject to certain limitations, such as deductibles and copayments.
Duke Energy did not make any pre-funding contributions to its other post-retirement benefit plans during the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 or 2017.2020.
208

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Components of Net Periodic Other Post-Retirement Benefit Costs
Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Service cost$3 $1 $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation17 4 7 4 3 1 1 1 
Expected return on plan assets(10)(6)     (2)
Amortization of actuarial loss2  1 1 1    
Amortization of prior service credit(8)(3)(2)(1)(1)  (2)
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs (a)(b)
$4 $(4)$6 $4 $3 $1 $1 $(3)
Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Service cost$$$$— $— $— $$— 
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation18 
Expected return on plan assets(11)(7)— — — — — (2)
Amortization of actuarial loss— — — — 
Amortization of prior service credit(13)(4)(2)(1)(1)(1)(1)(2)
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs(a)(b)
$— $(6)$$$$— $$(3)
Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Service cost$$$$— $— $— $$— 
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation23 10 
Expected return on plan assets(13)(8)— — — — — (2)
Amortization of actuarial loss— — — — 
Amortization of prior service credit(14)(4)(3)(1)(2)(1)(1)(2)
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs(a)(b)
$$(6)$$$$— $$(3)
(a)
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Service cost  $4
 $1
 $1
 $
 $1
 $
 $1
 $
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation  30
 7
 12
 7
 5
 1
 3
 1
Expected return on plan assets  (12) (7) 
 
 
 
 
 (1)
Amortization of actuarial loss4
 2
 1
 
 1
 
 4
 
Amortization of prior service credit  (19) (5) (8) (1) (7) (1) (1) (2)
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs (a)(b)
$7
 $(2) $6
 $6
 $
 $
 $7
 $(2)

Duke Energy amounts exclude $4 million, $5 million and $6 million for the years ended December 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
  Year Ended December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Service cost  $6
 $1
 $1
 $
 $1
 $1
 $1
 $1
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation  28
 7
 12
 6
 6
 1
 3
 1
Expected return on plan assets  (13) (8) 
 
 
 
 
 (2)
Amortization of actuarial loss6
 3
 1
 1
 
 
 4
 
Amortization of prior service credit  (19) (5) (8) (1) (7) (1) (1) (2)
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs(a)(b)
$8
 $(2) $6
 $6
 $
 $1
 $7
 $(2)

(b)    Duke Energy Ohio amounts exclude $1 million, $1 million and $1 million for the years ended December 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
220
209




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


  Year Ended December 31, 2017
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Service cost  $4
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $1
Interest cost on accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation  34
 8
 13
 7
 6
 1
 3
 1
Expected return on plan assets  (14) (8) 
 
 
 
 (1) (2)
Amortization of actuarial loss (gain)  10
 (2) 21
 12
 9
 (2) (1) 1
Amortization of prior service credit  (115) (10) (84) (54) (30) 
 (1) 
Curtailment credit(c)
(30) (4) (16) 
 (16) (2) (2) 
Net periodic post-retirement benefit costs(a)(b)
$(111) $(15) $(66) $(35) $(31) $(3) $(2) $1

(a)Duke Energy amounts exclude $6 million, $7 million and $7 million for the years ended December 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
(b)Duke Energy Ohio amounts exclude $2 million, $2 million and $2 million for the years ended December 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, of regulatory asset amortization resulting from purchase accounting adjustments associated with Duke Energy's merger with Cinergy in April 2006.
(c)Curtailment credit resulted from a reduction in average future service of plan participants due to a plan amendment.
Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Regulatory assets, net increase (decrease)$(127) $
 $(127) $(82) $(45) $
 $(5) $
Regulatory liabilities, net increase (decrease)  $(152) $1
 $(149) $(93) $(56) $(1) $(4) $3
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss                 
Deferred income tax benefit   $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Amortization of prior year actuarial gain  (4) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income  $(4) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
  Year Ended December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Regulatory assets, net increase (decrease)$137
 $
 $133
 $84
 $49
 $
 $(5) $4
Regulatory liabilities, net increase (decrease)  $154
 $(6) $149
 $93
 $56
 $2
 $3
 $
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss                 
Deferred income tax benefit   $(1) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Amortization of prior year prior service credit 1
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income  $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $

Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Regulatory assets, net (decrease) increase$(79)$ $(80)$(45)$(36)$ $(3)$ 
Regulatory liabilities, net increase (decrease)$27 $ $ $ $ $ $19 $(5)
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
Amortization of prior year actuarial gain$1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income$1 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 

Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Regulatory assets, net (decrease) increase$(15)$— $(18)$(9)$(9)$$(4)$— 
Regulatory liabilities, net increase$23 $12 $— $— $— $$$
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
Amortization of prior year actuarial gain$(1)$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Net amount recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income$(1)$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
221




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


Reconciliation of Funded Status to Accrued Other Post-Retirement Benefit Costs
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation  
  
                    
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at prior measurement date  $728
 $174
 $303
 $166
 $137
 $29
 $67
 $30
Service cost  4
 1
 1
 
 1
 
 1
 
Interest cost  30
 7
 12
 7
 5
 1
 3
 1
Plan participants' contributions  16
 3
 6
 3
 2
 1
 2
 
Actuarial losses28
 9
 13
 9
 5
 1
 2
 
Transfers  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Benefits paid  (83) (19) (32) (17) (15) (3) (11) (1)
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at measurement date  $723
 $175
 $303
 $168
 $135
 $29
 $64
 $30
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Plan assets at prior measurement date  
$195
 $115
 $
 $
 $
 $8
 $5
 $29
Actual return on plan assets  32
 20
 (1) 
 
 1
 
 6
Benefits paid  (83) (19) (32) (17) (15) (3) (11) (1)
Employer contributions60
 11
 26
 13
 13
 2
 9
 
Plan participants' contributions  16
 3
 6

3

2

1

2
 
Plan assets at measurement date  $220
 $130
 $(1) $(1) $
 $9
 $5
 $34
Funded status of plan$(503) $(45) $(304) $(169) $(135) $(20) $(59) $4

Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at prior measurement date$625 $149 $263 $147 $112 $25 $54 $27 
Service cost3 1       
Interest cost17 4 7 4 3 1 1 1 
Plan participants' contributions11 2 4 2 2 1 1  
Actuarial gains(80)(17)(43)(27)(16)(3)(1)(5)
Plan amendments(71)(11)(37)(18)(19) (17) 
Benefits paid(68)(16)(26)(13)(13)(4)(8)(2)
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at measurement date$437 $112 $168 $95 $69 $20 $30 $21 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
Plan assets at prior measurement date$211 $135 $(1)$(2)$(2)$9 $6 $39 
Actual return on plan assets(31)(19)   (2) (7)
Benefits paid(68)(16)(26)(13)(13)(4)(8)(2)
Employer contributions39 3 23 11 11 3 4 1 
Plan participants' contributions11 2 4 2 2 1 1  
Plan assets at measurement date$162 $105 $ $(2)$(2)$7 $3 $31 
Funded status of plan$(275)$(7)$(168)$(97)$(71)$(13)$(27)$10 
  Year Ended December 31, 2018
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation  
                      
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at prior measurement date  $813
 $189
 $342
 $184
 $156
 $30
 $78
 $32
Service cost  6
 1
 1
 
 1
 1
 1
 1
Interest cost  28
 7
 12
 6
 6
 1
 3
 1
Plan participants' contributions  18
 3
 6
 4
 3
 1
 2
 
Actuarial losses (gains)(51) (8) (23) (9) (13) (2) (5) (1)
Transfers  
 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1)
Benefits paid  (86) (18) (35) (19) (16) (2) (12) (2)
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at measurement date  $728
 $174
 $303
 $166
 $137
 $29
 $67
 $30
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets  
  
   
   
   
   
   
   
  
Plan assets at prior measurement date  $225
 $133
 $
 $
 $
 $7
 $11
 $31
Actual return on plan assets  (8) (5) 
 
 
 
 
 (1)
Benefits paid  (86) (18) (35) (19) (16) (2) (12) (2)
Employer contributions (reimbursements)46
 2
 29
 15
 13
 2
 4
 1
Plan participants' contributions  18
 3
 6
 4
 3
 1
 2
 
Plan assets at measurement date  $195
 $115
 $
 $
 $
 $8
 $5
 $29
Funded status of plan$(533) $(59) $(303) $(166) $(137) $(21) $(62) $(1)
210


222




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at prior measurement date$709 $174 $299 $166 $130 $27 $61 $30 
Service cost— — — — 
Interest cost18 
Plan participants' contributions14 — 
Actuarial gains(47)(14)(20)(10)(10)(1)(2)(2)
Benefits paid(73)(19)(29)(16)(13)(3)(9)(2)
Accumulated post-retirement benefit obligation at measurement date$625 $149 $263 $147 $112 $25 $54 $27 
Change in Fair Value of Plan Assets
Plan assets at prior measurement date$237 $139 $(1)$(2)$(1)$$$37 
Actual return on plan assets15 — — — — 
Benefits paid(73)(19)(29)(16)(13)(3)(9)(2)
Employer contributions18 24 13 10 
Plan participants' contributions14 — 
Plan assets at measurement date$211 $135 $(1)$(2)$(2)$$$39 
Funded status of plan$(414)$(14)$(264)$(149)$(114)$(16)$(48)$12 

Amounts Recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
  December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Current post-retirement liability(a)
$9
 $
 $5
 $3
 $2
 $1
 $
 $
Noncurrent post-retirement liability(b)
494
 45
 299
 166
 133
 19
 59
 (4)
Total accrued post-retirement liability  $503
 $45
 $304
 $169
 $135
 $20
 $59
 $(4)
Regulatory assets  $135
 $
 $135
 $82
 $53
 $
 $36
 $
Regulatory liabilities  $149
 $39
 $
 $
 $
 $17
 $63
 $3
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Deferred income tax expense$3
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Prior service credit  (2) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial gain  (13) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income  $(12) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Amounts to be recognized in net periodic pension expense in the next year    
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Unrecognized net actuarial loss  $5
 $3
 $1
 $
 $1
 $
 $
 $
Unrecognized prior service credit(14) (4) (3) (1) (2) (1) (1) (2)
December 31, 2018December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions) Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Prefunded post-retirement benefitPrefunded post-retirement benefit$ $ $ $ $ $1 $ $10 
Current post-retirement liability(a)
$8
 $
 $5
 $3
 $2
 $2
 $
 $
Current post-retirement liability(a)
9  5 3 2 2   
Noncurrent post-retirement liability(b)
525
 59
 298
 163
 135
 19
 62
 1
Noncurrent post-retirement liability(b)
266 7 163 94 69 12 27  
Total accrued post-retirement liability $533
 $59
 $303
 $166
 $137
 $21
 $62
 $1
Net liability (asset) recognizedNet liability (asset) recognized$275 $7 $168 $97 $71 $13 $27 $(10)
Regulatory assets $262
 $
 $262
 $164
 $98
 $
 $41
 $
Regulatory assets$50 $ $46 $34 $11 $4 $25 $ 
Regulatory liabilities $301
 $38
 $149
 $93
 $56
 $18
 $67
 $
Regulatory liabilities$189 $44 $ $ $ $21 $82 $ 
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss   
   
   
   
   
   
   
   
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
Deferred income tax expense$3
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Deferred income tax expense$3 $ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Prior service credit (2) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Prior service credit(1)       
Net actuarial gain (9) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net actuarial gain(13)       
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income $(8) $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income$(11)$ $ $ $ $ $ $ 
Amounts to be recognized in net periodic pension expense in the next year               
Unrecognized net actuarial loss (gain)$4
 $2
 $1
 $
 $
 $
 $
 $
Unrecognized prior service credit(19) (5) (7) (1) (6) (1) (1) (2)
211

(a)FINANCIAL STATEMENTSIncluded in Other within Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
(b)Included in Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Prefunded post-retirement benefit$12 $— $— $— $— $$— $12 
Current post-retirement liability(a)
— — — 
Noncurrent post-retirement liability(b)
417 14 259 146 112 16 48 — 
Net liability (asset) recognized$414 $14 $264 $149 $114 $16 $48 $(12)
Regulatory assets$129 $— $126 $79 $47 $$28 $— 
Regulatory liabilities$162 $44 $— $— $— $21 $63 $
Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss
Deferred income tax expense$$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
Prior service credit(1)— — — — — — — 
Net actuarial gain(14)— — — — — — — 
Net amounts recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income$(12)$— $— $— $— $— $— $— 
(a)    Included in Other within Current Liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. 
(b)    Included in Accrued pension and other post-retirement benefit costs on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Assumptions Used for Other Post-Retirement Benefits Accounting
The discount rate used to determine the current year other post-retirement benefits obligation and following year’s other post-retirement benefits expense is based on a bond selection-settlement portfolio approach. This approach develops a discount rate by selecting a portfolio of high qualityhigh-quality corporate bonds that generate sufficient cash flow to provide for projected benefit payments of the plan. The selected bond portfolio is derived from a universe of non-callable corporate bonds rated Aa quality or higher. After the bond portfolio is selected, a single interest rate is determined that equates the present value of the plan’s projected benefit payments discounted at this rate with the market value of the bonds selected.

223




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


The average remaining service period of active covered employees is eightseven years for Duke Energy and Duke Energy Carolinas, seven years for Progress Energy, Duke Energy Florida, and Duke Energy Ohio, and six years for Duke Energy Progress,Carolinas, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont.Piedmont and five years for Progress Energy and Duke Energy Progress.
The following tables present the assumptions used for other post-retirement benefits accounting.
   December 31,
   2019
 2018
 2017
Benefit Obligations  
   
   
   
Discount rate   3.30% 4.30% 3.60%
Net Periodic Benefit Cost  
   
   
   
Discount rate   4.30% 3.60% 4.10%
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets   6.85% 6.50% 6.50%
Assumed tax rate   23% 35% 35%

December 31,
202220212020
Benefit Obligations
Discount rate5.60 %2.90 %2.60 %
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Discount rate2.90 %2.60 %3.30 %
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets6.50 %6.50 %6.85 %
Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rate
  December 31,
  2019
 2018
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year  6.00% 6.50%
Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)  4.75% 4.75%
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend  2026
 2024

Sensitivity to Changes in Assumed Health Care Cost Trend Rates
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
1-Percentage Point Increase  
          
     
Effect on total service and interest costs  $1
$
$1
$1
$
$
$
$
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation  22
5
9
5
4
1
2
1
1-Percentage Point Decrease        
Effect on total service and interest costs  (1)
(1)(1)



Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation  (20)(5)(8)(4)(4)(1)(2)(1)

December 31,
20222021
Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year6.50 %6.25 %
Rate to which the cost trend is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)4.75 %4.75 %
Year that rate reaches ultimate trend2030-20322028
212

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Expected Benefit Payments
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Years ending December 31,            
   
2020$76
$18
$29
$16
$13
$4
$8
$2
202170
17
28
15
13
3
7
2
202266
16
27
14
12
3
7
2
202363
15
25
14
12
3
6
2
202459
15
24
13
11
3
6
2
2025-2029246
60
101
55
46
11
23
11

DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Years ending December 31,
2023$68 $16 $25 $14 $11 $$$
202449 13 18 10 
202545 12 16 
202641 11 15 
202738 10 14 
2028-2032158 41 61 36 25 
PLAN ASSETS
Description and Allocations
Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust
Assets for both the qualified pension and other post-retirement benefits are maintained in the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust. Approximately 98% of the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust assets were allocated to qualified pension plans and approximately 2% were allocated to other post-retirement plans (comprised of 401(h) accounts), as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018.2021. The investment objective of the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust is to invest in a diverse portfolio of assets that is expected to generate positive surplus return over time (i.e., asset growth greater than liability growth) subject to a prudent level of portfolio risk, for the purpose of enhancing the security of benefits for plan participants.

224




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


As of December 31, 2019,2022, Duke Energy assumes qualified pension and other post-retirement plan assets will generate a long-term rate of return of 6.85%.8.25% for the RCBP pension and RCBP 401(h) account assets and 6.5% for the DELPP pension and DELPP 401(h) account assets. The expected long-term rate of return was developed using a weighted average calculation of expected returns based primarily on future expected returns across asset classes considering the use of active asset managers, where applicable. The asset allocation targets were set after considering the investment objective and the risk profile. Equity securities are held for their higher expected returns. Debt securities are primarily held to hedge the qualified pension plan liability. Real assets, returnplan. Return seeking fixed income,debt securities, hedge funds and other global securities are held for diversification. Investments within asset classes are diversified to achieve broad market participation and reduce the impact of individual managers or investments.
Effective January 1, 2019,2023, the target asset allocation for the Duke Energy Retirement Master TrustRCBP assets is 58%35% liability hedging and 65% return-seeking assets and the target asset allocation for the DELPP assets is 80% liability hedging assets and 42%20% return-seeking assets. Duke Energy periodically reviews its asset allocation targets, and over time, as the funded status of the benefit plans increase, the level of asset risk relative to plan liabilities may be reduced to better manage Duke Energy's benefit plan liabilities and reduce funded status volatility.
The Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust is authorized to engage in the lending of certain plan assets. Securities lending is an investment management enhancement that utilizes certain existing securities of the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust to earn additional income. Securities lending involves the loaning of securities to approved parties. In return for the loaned securities, the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust receives collateral in the form of cash and securities as a safeguard against possible default of any borrower on the return of the loan under terms that permit the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust to sell the securities. The Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust mitigates credit risk associated with securities lending arrangements by monitoring the fair value of the securities loaned, with additional collateral obtained or refunded as necessary. The fair value of securities on loan was approximately $351$390 million and $154$542 million at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively. Cash and securities obtained as collateral exceeded the fair value of the securities loaned at December 31, 2019,2022, and 2018,2021, respectively. Securities lending income earned by the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust was immaterial for the years ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 2017,2020, respectively.
Qualified pension and other post-retirement benefits for the Subsidiary Registrants are derived from the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust, as such, each are allocated their proportionate share of the assets discussed below.
The following table includes the target asset allocations by asset class at December 31, 2019,2022, and the actual asset allocations for the Duke Energy Master Retirement Trust.RCBP assets.
Actual Allocation at
   Actual Allocation atTargetDecember 31,
Target
 December 31,
Allocation
 2019
 2018
Allocation20222021
U.S. equity securities % % 11%
Global equity securities 28% 27% 18%Global equity securities45 %49 %24 %
Global private equity securities 1% 1% 2%Global private equity securities%2 %%
Debt securities58% 57% 63%Debt securities35 %30 %62 %
Return seeking debt securities4% 5% %Return seeking debt securities%7 %%
Hedge funds 3% 3% 2%Hedge funds%6 %%
Real estate and cash 6% 7% 2%Real estate and cash%6 %%
Other global securities % % 2%
Total 100% 100% 100%Total100 %100 %100 %

213

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
The following table includes the target asset allocations by asset class at December 31, 2022, and the actual asset allocations for the DELPP assets.
Actual Allocation at
TargetDecember 31,
Allocation20222021
Global equity securities14 %14 %24 %
Global private equity securities% %%
Debt securities80 %80 %62 %
Return seeking debt securities%2 %%
Hedge funds%2 %%
Real estate and cash%2 %%
Total100 %100 %100 %
Other post-retirement assets
Duke Energy's other post-retirement assets are comprised of VEBAVoluntary Employees' Beneficiary Association (VEBA) trusts and 401(h) accounts held within the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust. Duke Energy's investment objective is to achieve sufficient returns, subject to a prudent level of portfolio risk, for the purpose of promoting the security of plan benefits for participants.
The following table presents target and actual asset allocations for the VEBA trusts at December 31, 2019.
     Actual Allocation at
 Target
 December 31,
  Allocation
 2019
 2018
U.S. equity securities  33% 35% 43%
Non-U.S. equity securities7% 9% 8%
Real estate2% 2% 2%
Debt securities  45% 37% 40%
Cash  13% 17% 7%
Total  100% 100% 100%

2022.

225




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


Actual Allocation at
TargetDecember 31,
Allocation20222021
U.S. equity securities30 %12 %19 %
Non-U.S. equity securities%5 %%
Real estate%3 %%
Debt securities45 %11 %18 %
Cash19 %69 %55 %
Total100 %100 %100 %
Fair Value Measurements
Duke Energy classifies recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements based on the fair value hierarchy as discussed in Note 17.
Valuation methods of the primary fair value measurements disclosed below are as follows:
Investments in equity securities
Investments in equity securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the last business day of the reporting period. Principal active markets for equity prices include published exchanges such as NASDAQ and NYSE. Foreign equity prices are translated from their trading currency using the currency exchange rate in effect at the close of the principal active market. Prices have not been adjusted to reflect after-hours market activity. The majority of investments in equity securities are valued using Level 1 measurements. When the price of an institutional commingled fund is unpublished, it is not categorized in the fair value hierarchy, even though the funds are readily available at the fair value.
Investments in corporate debt securities and U.S. government securities
Most debt investments are valued based on a calculation using interest rate curves and credit spreads applied to the terms of the debt instrument (maturity and coupon interest rate) and consider the counterparty credit rating. Most debt valuations are Level 2 measurements. If the market for a particular fixed-income security is relatively inactive or illiquid, the measurement is Level 3. U.S. Treasury debt is typically Level 2.
Investments in short-term investment funds
Investments in short-term investment funds are valued at the net asset value of units held at year end and are readily redeemable at the measurement date. Investments in short-term investment funds with published prices are valued as Level 1. Investments in short-term investment funds with unpublished prices are valued as Level 2.
Investments in real estate limited partnerships
Investments in real estate limited partnerships are valued by the trustee at each valuation date (monthly). As part of the trustee’s valuation process, properties are externally appraised generally on an annual basis, conducted by reputable, independent appraisal firms, and signed by appraisers that are members of the Appraisal Institute, with the professional designation MAI. Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. There are three valuation techniques that can be used to value investments in real estate assets: the market, income or cost approach. The appropriateness of each valuation technique depends on the type of asset or business being valued. In addition, the trustee may cause additional appraisals to be performed as warranted by specific asset or market conditions. Property valuations and the salient valuation-sensitive assumptions of each direct investment property are reviewed by the trustee quarterly and values are adjusted if there has been a significant change in circumstances related to the investment property since the last valuation. Value adjustments for interim capital expenditures are only recognized to the extent that the valuation process acknowledges a corresponding increase in fair value. An independent firm is hired to review and approve quarterly direct real estate valuations. Key inputs and assumptions used to determine fair value includes among others, rental revenue and expense amounts and related revenue and expense growth rates, terminal capitalization rates and discount rates. Development investments are valued using cost incurred to date as a primary input until substantive progress is achieved in terms of mitigating construction and leasing risk at which point a discounted cash flow approach is more heavily weighted. Key inputs and assumptions in addition to those noted above used to determine the fair value of development investments include construction costs and the status of construction completion and leasing. Investments in real estate limited partnerships are valued at net asset value of units held at year end and are not readily redeemable at the measurement date. Investments in real estate limited partnerships are not categorized within the fair value hierarchy.

226214




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


Duke Energy CorporationMaster Retirement Trust
The following tables provide the fair value measurement amounts for the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust qualified pension and other post-retirement assets.
  December 31, 2019
 Total Fair
       Not
(in millions)  Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Categorized(b)

Equity securities  $2,730
 $2,712
 $
 $
 $18
Corporate debt securities  3,999
 
 3,999
 
 
Short-term investment funds  545
 455
 90
 
 
Partnership interests  104
 
 
 
 104
Hedge funds  206
 
 
 
 206
Real estate limited partnerships  
 
 
 
 
U.S. government securities  1,231
 
 1,231
 
 
Guaranteed investment contracts  11
 
 
 11
 
Governments bonds – foreign  78
 
 78
 
 
Cash  75
 75
 
 
 
Net pending transactions and other investments  46
 (43) 89
 
 
Total assets(a)
$9,025
 $3,199
 $5,487
 $11

$328
(a)Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana, and Piedmont were allocated approximately 26%, 31%, 15%, 17%, 5%, 7%, and 4%, respectively, of the Duke Energy Master Retirement Trust at December 31, 2019. Accordingly, all amounts included in the table above are allocable to the Subsidiary Registrants using these percentages.
(b)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
December 31, 2022
Total FairNot
(in millions)ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Categorized(b)
Equity securities$2,234 $2,014 $194 $ $26 
Corporate debt securities2,944  2,944   
Short-term investment funds193 1 192   
Partnership interests62   62  
Hedge funds209    209 
U.S. government securities1,254  1,254   
Governments bonds – foreign112  112   
Cash45 45    
Government and commercial mortgage backed securities6  6   
Net pending transactions and other investments14 5 9   
Total assets(a)
$7,073 $2,065 $4,711 $62 $235 
  December 31, 2018
 Total Fair
       Not
(in millions)  Value
 Level 1
 Level 2
 Level 3
 
Categorized(b)

Equity securities  $2,373
 $1,751
 $
 $
 $622
Corporate debt securities  4,054
 
 4,054
 
 
Short-term investment funds  363
 279
 84
 
 
Partnership interests  120
 
 
 
 120
Hedge funds  226
 
 
 
 226
Real estate limited partnerships  144
 
 
 
 144
U.S. government securities  961
 
 961
 
 
Guaranteed investment contracts  27
 
 
 27
 
Governments bonds – foreign  30
 
 30
 
 
Cash  28
 28
 
 
 
Net pending transactions and other investments  (2) (6) 4
 
 
Total assets(a)
$8,324
 $2,052
 $5,133
 $27
 $1,112
(a)Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana, and Piedmont were allocated approximately 27%, 31%, 15%, 16%, 5%, 7%, and 4%, respectively, of the Duke Energy Master Retirement Trust and Piedmont's Pension assets at December 31, 2018.(a)    Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont were allocated approximately 27%, 33%, 15%, 18%, 5%, 7% and 3%, respectively, of the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust at December 31, 2022. Accordingly, all amounts included in the table above are allocable to the Subsidiary Registrants using these percentages.
(b)Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy.

227


(b)    Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy.

December 31, 2021
Total FairNot
(in millions)ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Categorized(b)
Equity securities$2,575 $2,547 $— $— $28 
Corporate debt securities4,189 — 4,189 — — 
Short-term investment funds382 272 110 — — 
Partnership interests95 — — 95 — 
Hedge funds216 — — — 216 
U.S. government securities1,618 — 1,618 — — 
Governments bonds – foreign78 — 78 — — 
Cash144 144 — — — 
Government and commercial mortgage backed securities— — — 
Net pending transactions and other investments53 12 41 — — 
Total assets(a)
$9,352 $2,975 $6,038 $95 $244 

(a)    Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress, Duke Energy Florida, Duke Energy Ohio, Duke Energy Indiana and Piedmont were allocated approximately 26%, 32%, 15%, 17%, 5%, 7% and 4%, respectively, of the Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust at December 31, 2021. Accordingly, all amounts included in the table above are allocable to the Subsidiary Registrants using these percentages.
(b)    Certain investments that are measured at fair value using the net asset value per share practical expedient have not been categorized in the fair value hierarchy.
FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS


The following table provides a reconciliation of beginning and ending balances of Duke Energy Corporation Master Retirement Trust qualified pension and other post-retirement assets at fair value on a recurring basis where the determination of fair value includes significant unobservable inputs (Level 3).
(in millions) 2019
 2018
(in millions)20222021
Balance at January 1 $27
 $28
Balance at January 1$95 $— 
Sales (18) (1)Sales(18)— 
Total gains and other, net 2
 
Total gains and other, net(8)— 
Transfer of Level 3 assets to other classifications
 
Transfer of Level 3 assets from other classificationsTransfer of Level 3 assets from other classifications(7)95 
Balance at December 31 $11
 $27
Balance at December 31$62 $95 

215

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSEMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS
Other post-retirement assets
The following tables provide the fair value measurement amounts for VEBA trust assets.
  December 31, 2019
 Total Fair
  
(in millions)  Value
 Level 2
Cash and cash equivalents  $9
 $9
Real estate1
 1
Equity securities  22
 22
Debt securities  18
 18
Total assets  $50
 $50
December 31, 2018December 31, 2022
Total Fair
  Total Fair
(in millions) Value
 Level 2
(in millions)ValueLevel 2
Cash and cash equivalents $3
 $3
Cash and cash equivalents$11 $11 
Real estate1
 1
Real estate2 2 
Equity securities 25
 25
Equity securities12 12 
Debt securities 20
 20
Debt securities8 8 
Total assets $49
 $49
Total assets$33 $33 
December 31, 2021
Total Fair
(in millions)ValueLevel 2
Cash and cash equivalents$14 $14 
Real estate
Equity securities18 18 
Debt securities11 11 
Total assets$45 $45 
EMPLOYEE SAVINGS PLANS
Retirement Savings Plan
Duke Energy or its affiliates sponsor,Corporation sponsors, and the Subsidiary Registrants participate in, employee savings plans that cover substantially all U.S. employees. Most employees participate in a matching contribution formula where Duke Energy provides a matching contribution generally equal to 100% of employee before-tax and Roth 401(k) contributions of up to 6% of eligible pay per pay period. Dividends on Duke Energy shares held by the savings plans are charged to retained earnings when declared and shares held in the plans are considered outstanding in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS.
For new and rehired employees who are not eligible to participate in Duke Energy’s defined benefit plans, an additional employer contribution of 4% of eligible pay per pay period, which is subject to a three-year vesting schedule, is provided to the employee’s savings plan account. Certain Piedmont employees whose participation in a prior Piedmont defined benefit plan (that was frozen as of December 31, 2017) are eligible for employer transition credit contributions of 3% to 5% of eligible pay per period, for each pay period during the three-year period ending December 31, 2020.
The following table includes pretax employer matching contributions made by Duke Energy and expensed by the Subsidiary Registrants.
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Years ended December 31,                        
2019$214
 $66
 $58
 $38
 $20
 $5
 $11
 $13
2018213
 68
 58
 40
 19
 4
 10
 12
2017179
 61
 53
 37
 16
 3
 9
 7


DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Years ended December 31,
2022$246 $76 $65 $43 $22 $6 $12 $13 
2021229 70 60 39 21 12 11 
2020213 67 57 38 19 11 13 
228




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES


24. INCOME TAXES
TaxInflation Reduction Act
On December 22, 2017, President TrumpAugust 16, 2022, the IRA was signed the Tax Act into law. Among other provisions, the TaxIRA implemented a new 15% corporate alternative minimum tax based on GAAP net income, with certain adjustments as defined by the IRA, and clean energy-related provisions. The IRA's clean energy provisions include, among other provisions, the extension and modification of existing investment and PTCs for projects placed in service through 2024 and introduces new technology-neutral clean energy related credits beginning in 2025. In addition, the IRA created a new, zero-emission nuclear power PTC and a clean hydrogen PTC.
Duke Energy has preliminarily reviewed the provisions of the IRA and has determined there were no material impacts on the results of operations, financial position, or cash flows in the periods presented for the Duke Energy Registrants as a result of the IRA being signed into law. Based on the preliminary review of the IRA provisions, future annual cash flow impacts related to the energy credits could be material to the Duke Energy Registrants. However, the majority of Duke Energy's operations are regulated and the FERC and state utility commissions will determine the regulatory treatment. We anticipate the Subsidiary Registrants will defer and expect to pass along the net financial impact associated with the IRA to customers over time. See Note 4 for further details on the IRA as it relates to Duke Energy Florida. Duke Energy will continue to assess the IRA as new information and anticipated guidance from the U.S. Department of the Treasury becomes available.
216

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES
North Carolina's 2021 Appropriations Act lowered
On November 18, 2021, North Carolina Senate Bill 105 (SB 105) was signed into law. Starting with tax year 2025, SB 105 begins phasing out the North Carolina corporate federal income tax rate over five years, from 35%a statutory rate of 2.5% to 21%, limits interest deductions outside of regulated utility operations, requires the normalization of excess deferred taxes associated with property under the average rate assumption method as a prerequisite to qualifying for accelerated depreciation and repealed the federal manufacturing deduction. The Tax Act also repealed the corporate AMT and stipulates a refund of 50% of remaining AMT credit carryforwards (to the extent the credits exceed regular tax for the year) for tax years 2018, 2019, and 2020, with all remaining AMT credits to be refunded in tax year 2021.
On December 22, 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act, which provides guidance on accounting for the Tax Act’s impact. SAB 118 provides a measurement period, which in no case should extend beyond one year from the Tax Act enactment date, during which a company acting in good faith may complete the accounting for the impacts of the Tax Act under ASC Topic 740. In accordance with SAB 118, a company must reflect the income tax effects of the Tax Act in the reporting period in which the accounting under ASC Topic 740 is complete. To the extent that a company’s accounting for certain income tax effects of the Tax Act is incomplete, a company can determine a reasonable estimate for those effects and record a provisional estimate in the financial statements in the first reporting period in which a reasonable estimate can be determined.
As of December 31, 2018, the accounting for the effects of the Tax Act was complete. During the year ended December 31, 2018,zero. Duke Energy recorded the following measurement period adjustments in accordance with SAB 118:
Additional tax expensea net reduction of $23approximately $490 million related to the completion of the analysis of Duke Energy’s existing regulatory liability related to deferred taxes;
A $10 million tax benefit for the remeasurement ofits North Carolina deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities primarily related to the guidance on bonus depreciation issued by the IRSliability in August 2018, affecting the computation of the Company's 2017 Federal income tax liability;
Additional tax expense of $7 million related to the portion of the deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2017, that represents nondeductible long-term incentives under the Tax Act’s limitation on the deductibility of executive compensation; and
During the fourth quarter of 2018,2021. The majority of this deferred tax liability reduction was offset by recording a regulatory liability pending NCUC determination of the Company releaseddisposition of the $76amounts related to Duke Energy Carolinas, Duke Energy Progress and Piedmont. In addition, Duke Energy recorded a net reduction of North Carolina consolidating deferred tax assets of approximately $25 million valuation allowance that it recordedto deferred state income tax expense in the firstfourth quarter of 20182021. North Carolina SB 105 did not have a significant impact on the financial position, results of operation, or cash flows of Duke Energy, Duke Energy Carolinas, Progress Energy, Duke Energy Progress or Piedmont.
Consolidated Appropriations Act
On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act (CAA) was signed into law. In addition to the CAA providing funding for government operations, it also provided tax provisions to assist with COVID-19 relief, including extending certain expiring tax provisions. The company has reviewed the provisions of the CAA and has determined that there are no material impacts on the financial statements as a result of additional guidance published by the IRS that stated refundableCAA being signed into law.
CARES Act
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted. The CARES Act was an emergency economic stimulus package in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Among other provisions, the CARES Act accelerated the remaining AMT credits would not be subjectcredit refund allowances resulting in taxpayers being able to sequestration.
The majority of Duke Energy’s operations are regulated and it is expected that the Subsidiary Registrants will ultimately pass on the savings associated with the amount representing the remeasurement of deferred tax balances related to regulated operations to customers. For Duke Energy's regulated operations, where the reduction is expected to be returned to customersimmediately claim a refund in future rates, the remeasurement has been deferred as a regulatory liability. During 2018, Duke Energy recorded an additional regulatory liability of $83 million, representing the revaluation of those deferred tax balances. The Subsidiary Registrants continue to respond to requests from regulators in various jurisdictions to determine the timing and magnitude of savings they will pass on to customers.
In addition, during 2018, Duke Energy reclassified $573 million offull for any AMT credit carryforwards from noncurrent deferred tax liabilities to a current federal income tax receivable.and provided for the deferral of certain 2020 payroll taxes. In 2019,the third quarter of 2020, Duke Energy received a refund of $573$572 million related to these AMT credit carryforwards based onand $19 million of interest income. In addition, the filingcompany deferred approximately $117 million of payroll taxes, of which, 50% were paid by December 31, 2021, with the remaining 50% payable by December 31, 2022. The other provisions within the CARES Act did not materially impact Duke Energy's 2018 income tax returnaccounting.
Income Tax Expense
Components of Income Tax Expense
Tax benefit from discontinued operations, in 2019 and reclassified $286 million of AMT credits from noncurrent deferred tax liabilities to a current federalthe following tables, includes income tax receivable.benefits related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details.

 Year Ended December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current income taxes
Federal$1 $(71)$(13)$37 $(37)$(2)$38 $32 
State(8)(13)(3) (23)1 2 2 
Foreign4        
Total current income taxes(3)(84)(16)37 (60)(1)40 34 
Deferred income taxes      
Federal328 230 310 118 201 (22)(63)12 
State(14)(16)59 7 84 3  (7)
Total deferred income taxes(a)
314 214 369 125 285 (19)(63)5 
ITC amortization(11)(4)(5)(4) (1)(1) 
Income tax expense from continuing operations300 126 348 158 225 (21)(24)39 
Tax benefit from discontinued operations(503)       
Total income tax (benefit) expense included in Consolidated Statements of Operations$(203)$126 $348 $158 $225 $(21)$(24)$39 
(a)     Total deferred income taxes includes the generation of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $550 million at Duke Energy, $97 million at Duke Energy Carolinas, $128 million at Progress Energy, $9 million at Duke Energy Progress, $111 million at Duke Energy Florida, $7 million at Duke Energy Ohio, $13 million at Duke Energy Indiana, and $12 million at Piedmont.
229
217




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES

 Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current income taxes       
Federal$(2)$241 $(15)$113 $(75)$(8)$65 $23 
State23 (4)(17)(2)
Foreign— — — — — — — 
Total current income taxes264 (19)121 (92)(10)72 26 
Deferred income taxes      
Federal275 (130)203 (16)202 35 19 17 
State— (79)47 (26)77 16 (13)
Total deferred income taxes(a)
275 (209)250 (42)279 40 35 
ITC amortization(8)(4)(4)(4)— — — — 
Income tax expense from continuing operations268 51 227 75 187 30 107 30 
Tax benefit from discontinued operations(76)— — — — — — — 
Total income tax expense included in Consolidated Statements of Operations$192 $51 $227 $75 $187 $30 $107 $30 

(a)    Total deferred income taxes includes the generation of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $32 million at Duke Energy Carolinas, $8 million at Duke Energy Indiana, and $3 million at Piedmont. In addition, total deferred income taxes includes utilization of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $250 million at Duke Energy, $95 million at Progress Energy, $14 million at Duke Energy Progress, $64 million at Duke Energy Florida, and $2 million at Duke Energy Ohio.
Income Tax Expense
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Current income taxes       
Federal$(281)$314 $280 $181 $148 $10 $48 $(27)
State(3)35 29 17 24 (8)
Foreign— — — — — — — 
Total current income taxes(283)349 309 198 172 11 55 (35)
Deferred income taxes       
Federal222 (171)(167)(180)30 12 60 
State(98)(86)(24)(49)25 17 (7)
Total deferred income taxes(a)
124 (257)(191)(229)26 32 29 53 
ITC amortization(10)(4)(5)(5)— — — — 
Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations(169)88 113 (36)198 43 84 18 
Tax benefit from discontinued operations(65)— — — — — — — 
Total income tax (benefit) expense included in Consolidated Statements of Operations$(234)$88 $113 $(36)$198 $43 $84 $18 
Components(a)    Total deferred income taxes includes the generation of Income Tax Expense
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Current income taxes        
Federal$(299)$164
$(173)$(36)$(43)$(41)$(23)$(92)
State10
13
(7)(3)18
(1)1
(1)
Foreign2







Total current income taxes(287)177
(180)(39)(25)(42)(22)(93)
Deferred income taxes        
Federal855
175
422
220
153
77
128
133
State(38)(37)17
(18)27
5
28
3
Total deferred income taxes(a)
817
138
439
202
180
82
156
136
ITC amortization(11)(4)(6)(6)



Income tax expense from continuing operations519
311
253
157
155
40
134
43
Tax benefit from discontinued operations(2)






Total income tax expense included in Consolidated Statements of Operations$517
$311
$253
$157
$155
$40
$134
$43

(a)Total deferred income taxes includes the generation of tax credit carryforwards of $8 million at Duke Energy Carolinas. In addition, total deferred income taxes includes utilization of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $243 million at Progress Energy, $35 million at Duke Energy Progress, $152 million at Duke Energy Florida, $25 million at Duke Energy Ohio, $60 million at Duke Energy Indiana, $90 million at Piedmont and $775 million at Duke Energy.
NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $20 million at Duke Energy Carolinas, $3 million at Duke Energy Progress, $8 million at Duke Energy Indiana, and $11 million at Piedmont. In addition, total deferred income taxes includes utilization of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $39 million at Progress Energy, $30 million at Duke Energy Florida and $189 million at Duke Energy.    
 Year Ended December 31, 2018 
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Current income taxes        
Federal$(647)$(8)$(135)$(71)$(49)$20
$29
$67
State(11)6
(5)(5)(10)(1)3
1
Foreign3







Total current income taxes(655)(2)(140)(76)(59)19
32
68
Deferred income taxes        
Federal1,064
299
341
256
115
21
74
(36)
State49
11
20
(17)45
3
22
5
Total deferred income taxes(a)(b)
1,113
310
361
239
160
24
96
(31)
ITC amortization(10)(5)(3)(3)



Income tax expense from continuing operations448
303
218
160
101
43
128
37
Tax benefit from discontinued operations(26)






Total income tax expense included in Consolidated Statements of Operations$422
$303
$218
$160
$101
$43
$128
$37
(a)Includes benefits of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $22 million at Duke Energy Carolinas, $293 million at Progress Energy, $59 million at Duke Energy Progress, $219 million at Duke Energy Florida, $17 million at Duke Energy Ohio, $21 million at Duke Energy Indiana and $39 million at Piedmont. In addition, total deferred income taxes includes utilization of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $18 million at Duke Energy.
(b)For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company has revised the December 31, 2017, estimates of the income tax effects of the Tax Act, in accordance with SAB 118. See the Statutory Rate Reconciliation section below for additional information on the Tax Act's impact on income tax expense.

230




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES


 Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Current income taxes        
Federal$(247)$221
$(436)$(95)$(188)$(37)$128
$(90)
State4
20
(5)2
(11)2
21
(3)
Foreign3







Total current income taxes(240)241
(441)(93)(199)(35)149
(93)
Deferred income taxes        
Federal1,344
381
664
378
194
99
138
147
State102
35
44
10
51
(4)14
8
Total deferred income taxes(a)(b)
1,446
416
708
388
245
95
152
155
ITC amortization(10)(5)(3)(3)
(1)

Income tax expense from continuing operations1,196
652
264
292
46
59
301
62
Tax benefit from discontinued operations(6)






Total income tax expense included in Consolidated Statements of Operations$1,190
$652
$264
$292
$46
$59
$301
$62

(a)Includes utilization of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $428 million at Duke Energy, $74 million at Progress Energy, $36 million at Duke Energy Florida, $17 million at Duke Energy Ohio, $42 million at Duke Energy Indiana and $79 million at Piedmont. In addition, total deferred income taxes includes benefits of NOL carryforwards and tax credit carryforwards of $10 million at Duke Energy Carolinas and $1 million at Duke Energy Progress.
(b)As a result of the Tax Act, Duke Energy's deferred tax assets and liabilities were revalued as of December 31, 2017. See the Statutory Rate Reconciliation section below for additional information on the Tax Act's impact on income tax expense.
Duke Energy Income from Continuing Operations before Income Taxes
 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)2019 2018 2017
Domestic(a)
$4,053
 $3,018
 $4,207
Foreign44
 55
 59
Income from continuing operations before income taxes$4,097
 $3,073
 $4,266

(a)Includes a $16 million expense in 2017 related to the Tax Act impact on equity earnings included within Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates on the Consolidated Statement of Operations.

 Years Ended December 31,
(in millions)202220212020
Domestic$3,991 $3,947 $907 
Foreign87 44 13 
Income from continuing operations before income taxes$4,078 $3,991 $920 
231
218




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES


Statutory Rate Reconciliation
The following tables present a reconciliation of income tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory tax rate to the actual tax expense from continuing operations.
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Income tax expense, computed at the statutory rate of 21%$860
$360
$332
$202
$178
$59
$120
$51
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect(22)(19)8
(17)35
3
22
2
Amortization of excess deferred income tax(121)(29)(64)(10)(54)(12)(6)(10)
AFUDC equity income(52)(9)(14)(13)(1)(3)(3)
AFUDC equity depreciation34
19
10
5
5
1
4

Renewable energy PTCs(120)






Other tax credits(23)(11)(9)(7)(2)(1)(1)(1)
Tax true up(64)(9)(8)(3)(5)(7)(1)
Other items, net27
9
(2)
(1)
(1)1
Income tax expense from continuing operations$519
$311
$253
$157
$155
$40
$134
$43
Effective tax rate12.7%18.1%16.0%16.3%18.3%14.3%23.5%17.6%
Year Ended December 31, 2018  Year Ended December 31, 2022
 Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 DukeDuke
Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 DukeEnergyProgressEnergy
(in millions)
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Income tax expense, computed at the statutory rate of 21%$645
$288
$263
$174
$137
$46
$109
$35
Income tax expense, computed at the statutory rate of 21%$856 $362 $457 $245 $238 $59 $24 $76 
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect30
14
13
(17)28
2
20
4
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect(17)(23)44 6 48 3 2 (4)
Amortization of excess deferred income tax(61)
(55)(1)(54)(3)(2)
Amortization of excess deferred income tax(481)(195)(133)(74)(59)(79)(48)(23)
AFUDC equity income(42)(15)(22)(12)(10)(2)(2)
AFUDC equity income(41)(20)(14)(11)(3)(1)(2)(2)
AFUDC equity depreciation31
18
9
5
4
1
4

AFUDC equity depreciation36 18 12 6 6 1 4  
Renewable energy PTCs(129)






Other tax credits(28)(7)(13)(5)(8)(1)(1)(3)Other tax credits(43)(12)(16)(9)(7)(2)(3)(8)
Tax Act(a)
20
1
25
19

2


Other items, net(18)4
(2)(3)4
(2)
1
Other items, net(10)(4)(2)(5)2 (2)(1) 
Income tax expense from continuing operations$448
$303
$218
$160
$101
$43
$128
$37
Income tax expense from continuing operations$300 $126 $348 $158 $225 $(21)$(24)$39 
Effective tax rate14.6%22.1%17.4%19.3%15.4%19.6%24.6%22.3%Effective tax rate7.4 %7.3 %16.0 %13.6 %19.8 %(7.5)%(21.2)%10.8 %

 Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Income tax expense, computed at the statutory rate of 21%$838 $291 $384 $224 $194 $49 $123 $71 
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect(44)34 (14)47 18 (8)
Amortization of excess deferred income tax(438)(184)(174)(120)(54)(22)(34)(25)
AFUDC equity income(34)(14)(11)(7)(3)(2)(4)(4)
AFUDC equity depreciation35 18 10 — 
Other tax credits(30)(12)(11)(8)(3)(1)(2)(4)
Valuation allowance(a)
(85)— — — — — — — 
Other items, net(19)(4)(5)(5)— 
Income tax expense from continuing operations$268 $51��$227 $75 $187 $30 $107 $30 
Effective tax rate6.7 %3.7 %12.4 %7.0 %20.2 %12.8 %18.2 %8.8 %
(a)For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company revised the December 31, 2017 estimates of the income tax effects of the Tax Act, in accordance with SAB 118. Amounts primarily include but are not limited to items that are excluded for ratemaking purposes related certain wholesale fixed rate contracts, remeasurement of nonregulated net deferred tax liabilities, Federal NOLs, and valuation allowance on foreign tax credits.

(a)    In the fourth quarter of 2021, the company recognized a federal capital gain in the amount of $426 million. As a result, a valuation allowance of $85 million related to a federal capital loss carryforward was released. This valuation allowance was originally recorded as a result of the 2019 sale of minority interest of certain renewable assets within the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups.
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Income tax expense, computed at the statutory rate of 21%$193 $219 $243 $80 $204 $62 $103 $61 
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect(80)(40)(25)39 19 (12)
Amortization of excess deferred income tax(276)(82)(118)(68)(49)(20)(36)(21)
AFUDC equity income(48)(13)(9)(6)(3)(2)(4)(10)
AFUDC equity depreciation103 19 10 — 
Other tax credits(37)(13)(16)(14)(2)(1)(3)(2)
Tax true up(12)(3)(5)— (1)
Other items, net(12)(2)(3)(1)
Income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations$(169)$88 $113 $(36)$198 $43 $84 $18 
Effective tax rate(18.4)%8.4 %9.7 %(9.5)%20.4 %14.6 %17.1 %6.2 %
232
219




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES


 Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Income tax expense, computed at the statutory rate of 35%$1,493
$653
$536
$353
$265
$88
$229
$70
State income tax, net of federal income tax effect69
36
25
8
26
(1)23
3
AFUDC equity income(81)(37)(32)(17)(16)(4)(8)
Renewable energy PTCs(132)






Tax Act(a)
(112)15
(246)(40)(226)(23)55
(12)
Tax true up(52)(24)(19)(13)(7)(5)(6)
Other items, net11
9

1
4
4
8
1
Income tax expense from continuing operations$1,196
$652
$264
$292
$46
$59
$301
$62
Effective tax rate28.0%34.9%17.2%29.0%6.1%23.4%46.0%30.8%

(a)Amounts primarily include but are not limited to items that are excluded for ratemaking purposes related to abandoned or impaired assets, certain wholesale fixed rate contracts, remeasurement of nonregulated net deferred tax liabilities, Federal NOLs, and valuation allowance on foreign tax credits.
Valuation allowances have been established for certain state NOL carryforwards and state income tax credits that reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that will be realized on a more-likely-than-not basis. The net change in the total valuation allowance is included in Statestate income tax, net of federal income tax effect, in the above tables.
Valuation allowances have been established for foreign tax credits that reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that will be realized on a more-likely-than-not basis. The net change in the total valuation allowance is included in Tax Act in the above tables.
DEFERRED TAXES
Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components
 December 31, 2019
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Deferred credits and other liabilities$125
$24
$25
$49
$
$14
$5
$22
Lease obligations462
72
193
92
102
5
17
6
Pension, post-retirement and other employee benefits303
(5)88
38
44
17
27
(3)
Progress Energy merger purchase accounting adjustments(a)
389







Tax credits and NOL carryforwards3,925
262
486
176
253
16
176
19
Regulatory liabilities and deferred credits




36
52
42
Investments and other assets




10

2
Other97
5
8
3
2
8
1
6
Valuation allowance(587)






Total deferred income tax assets4,714
358
800
358
401
106
278
94
Investments and other assets(1,664)(981)(577)(390)(190)
(12)
Accelerated depreciation rates(10,813)(3,254)(3,798)(1,918)(1,913)(1,028)(1,416)(802)
Regulatory assets and deferred debits, net(1,115)(44)(887)(438)(477)


Total deferred income tax liabilities(13,592)(4,279)(5,262)(2,746)(2,580)(1,028)(1,428)(802)
Net deferred income tax liabilities$(8,878)$(3,921)$(4,462)$(2,388)$(2,179)$(922)$(1,150)$(708)
(a)Primarily related to finance lease obligations and debt fair value adjustments.

The following tables include deferred income tax assets and liabilities related to the Commercial Renewables Disposal Groups. See Note 2 for further details.
233


 December 31, 2022
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Deferred credits and other liabilities$348 $170 $117 $33 $83 $12 $23 $24 
Lease obligations405 89 263 197 65 4 15 3 
Pension, post-retirement and other employee benefits192 (1)12 18 (10)9 10 (2)
Progress Energy merger purchase accounting adjustments(a)
301        
Tax credits and NOL carryforwards4,426 444 618 167 412 20 208 37 
Regulatory liabilities and deferred credits     3 61  
Investments and other assets     3   
Other106 18 22 12 10 5 2 9 
Valuation allowance(519)       
Total deferred income tax assets5,259 720 1,032 427 560 56 319 71 
Investments and other assets(1,671)(983)(521)(432)(102) (12)(28)
Accelerated depreciation rates(11,478)(3,410)(4,358)(1,844)(2,576)(1,192)(1,606)(892)
Regulatory assets and deferred debits, net(2,074)(480)(1,300)(628)(671)  (21)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(15,223)(4,873)(6,179)(2,904)(3,349)(1,192)(1,618)(941)
Net deferred income tax liabilities$(9,964)$(4,153)$(5,147)$(2,477)$(2,789)$(1,136)$(1,299)$(870)

(a)    Primarily related to lease obligations and debt fair value adjustments.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES


The following table presents the expiration of tax credits and NOL carryforwards.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2022
(in millions)
Amount
 Expiration Year(in millions)AmountExpiration Year
General Business Credits$1,821
 2024  2039General Business Credits$2,473 20272042
AMT credits286
 Refundable by 2021
Federal NOL carryforwards(a) (f)
169
 2024  Indefinite
Capital loss carryforward(e)
87
 2024
State carryforwards and credits(b) (f)
303
 2020  Indefinite
Federal NOL carryforwards(a) (e)
Federal NOL carryforwards(a) (e)
306 2024Indefinite
Charitable contribution carryforwardsCharitable contribution carryforwards18 20242027
State carryforwards and credits(b) (e)
State carryforwards and credits(b) (e)
394 2023Indefinite
Foreign NOL carryforwards(c)
12
 2027  2037
Foreign NOL carryforwards(c)
12 20272037
Foreign Tax Credits(d)
1,237
 2024  2027
Foreign Tax Credits(d)
1,223 20242028
Charitable contribution carryforwards10
 2020  2024
Total tax credits and NOL carryforwards$3,925
      Total tax credits and NOL carryforwards$4,426    
(a)A valuation allowance of $4 million has been recorded on the Federal NOL carryforwards, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(b)A valuation allowance of $97 million has been recorded on the state NOL and credit carryforwards, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(c)A valuation allowance of $12 million has been recorded on the foreign NOL carryforwards, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(d)A valuation allowance of $387 million has been recorded on the foreign tax credits, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(e)A valuation allowance of $87 million has been recorded on the Federal capital loss carryforward, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(f)
(a)    A valuation allowance of $4 million has been recorded on the Federal NOL carryforwards, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(b)    A valuation allowance of $109 million has been recorded on the state NOL and attribute carryforwards, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(c)    A valuation allowance of $12 million has been recorded on the foreign NOL carryforwards, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(d)    A valuation allowance of $391 million has been recorded on the foreign tax credits, as presented in the Net Deferred Income Tax Liability Components table.
(e)    Indefinite carryforward for Federal NOLs, and NOLs for states that have adopted the Tax Act's NOL provisions, generated in tax years beginning after December 31, 2017.
 December 31, 2018
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Deferred credits and other liabilities$164
$64
$35
$53
$
$17
$6
$17
Finance lease obligations60
26




2

Pension, post-retirement and other employee benefits347
24
110
47
58
16
24
(1)
Progress Energy merger purchase accounting adjustments(a)
483







Tax credits and NOL carryforwards4,580
257
693
215
363
42
237
110
Regulatory liabilities and deferred credits




56

48
Investments and other assets




18

16
Other25
6
5
5

1
(1)
Valuation allowance(484)






Total deferred income tax assets5,175
377
843
320
421
150
268
190
Investments and other assets(1,317)(795)(430)(272)(163)
(5)
Accelerated depreciation rates(10,124)(3,207)(3,369)(1,735)(1,670)(967)(1,081)(733)
Regulatory assets and deferred debits, net (1,540)(64)(985)(432)(574)
(191)
Other






(8)
Total deferred income tax liabilities(12,981)(4,066)(4,784)(2,439)(2,407)(967)(1,277)(741)
Net deferred income tax liabilities$(7,806)$(3,689)$(3,941)$(2,119)$(1,986)$(817)$(1,009)$(551)

(a)Primarily related to finance lease obligations and debt fair value adjustments.

234
220




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES

 December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Deferred credits and other liabilities$347 $121 $101 $60 $40 $19 $$18 
Lease obligations346 91 197 121 76 16 
Pension, post-retirement and other employee benefits207 (36)30 17 11 20 (8)
Progress Energy merger purchase accounting adjustments(a)
340 — — — — — — — 
Tax credits and NOL carryforwards3,784 349 497 160 306 13 195 29 
Regulatory liabilities and deferred credits— 11 — — — 16 — 
Investments and other assets— — — — — — 
Other85 12 12 
Valuation allowance(518)— — — — — — — 
Total deferred income tax assets4,591 548 837 365 433 75 246 57 
Investments and other assets(2,428)(1,205)(742)(610)(135)— — (39)
Accelerated depreciation rates(10,391)(2,977)(3,891)(1,546)(2,382)(1,125)(1,496)(833)
Regulatory assets and deferred debits, net (1,151)— (768)(417)(350)— (53)— 
Total deferred income tax liabilities(13,970)(4,182)(5,401)(2,573)(2,867)(1,125)(1,549)(872)
Net deferred income tax liabilities$(9,379)$(3,634)$(4,564)$(2,208)$(2,434)$(1,050)$(1,303)$(815)

(a)    Primarily related to lease obligations and debt fair value adjustments.
UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS
The following tables present changes to unrecognized tax benefits.
Year Ended December 31, 2019 Year Ended December 31, 2022
 Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 DukeDuke
Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 DukeEnergyProgressEnergy
(in millions)
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1$24
$6
$9
$6
$3
$1
$1
$4
Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1$51 $13 $15 $10 $4 $1 $2 $4 
Unrecognized tax benefit increases105
2
1
1




Gross decreases – tax positions in prior periods(3)
(1)(1)



Gross decreases – tax positions in prior periods        
Gross increases – current period tax positionsGross increases – current period tax positions14 4 4 3 1   5 
Total changes102
2






Total changes14 4 4 3 1   5 
Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31$126
$8
$9
$6
$3
$1
$1
$4
Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31$65 $17 $19 $13 $5 $1 $2 $9 

 Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1$125 $10 $10 $$$$$
Gross decreases – tax positions in prior periods(a)
(86)— — — — — — — 
Gross increases – current period tax positions12 — 
Total changes(74)— 
Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31$51 $13 $15 $10 $$$$
(a)    In the fourth quarter of 2021, the company recognized a federal capital gain in the amount of $426 million. As a result of the capital gain, a previously recorded unrecognized tax benefit related to the character of a taxable loss has been reversed. See note (a) under the Statutory Rate Reconciliation table for more details.
 Year Ended December 31, 2018 
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1$25
$5
$5
$5
$5
$1
$1
$3
Unrecognized tax benefits increases (decreases)        
Gross decreases – tax positions in prior periods(2)(1)

(4)


Gross increases – tax positions in prior periods7
2
4
1
2


1
Decreases due to settlements(6)






Total changes(1)1
4
1
(2)

1
Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31$24
$6
$9
$6
$3
$1
$1
$4
221


 Year Ended December 31, 2017 
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1$17
$1
$2
$2
$4
$4
$
$
Unrecognized tax benefits increases (decreases)        
Gross increases – tax positions in prior periods12
4
3
3
1
1
1
3
Gross decreases – tax positions in prior periods(4)



(4)

Total changes8
4
3
3
1
(3)1
3
Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31$25
$5
$5
$5
$5
$1
$1
$3

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Unrecognized tax benefits – January 1$126 $$$$$$$
Gross decreases – tax positions in prior periods(2)— — — — — — — 
Gross increases – current period tax positions— — — — — 
Reduction due to lapse of statute of limitations(3)— — — — — — (3)
Total changes(1)— — — — (3)
Unrecognized tax benefits – December 31$125 $10 $10 $$$$$
The following table includes additional information regarding the Duke Energy Registrants' unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2019. It is reasonably possible that2022. None of Duke Energy will reflectRegistrants anticipates a $3 millionmaterial increase or decrease in unrecognized tax benefits within the next 12 months.
December 31, 2019 December 31, 2022
 Duke
 Duke
Duke
Duke
Duke
 DukeDuke
Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
Energy
Energy
 DukeEnergyProgressEnergy
(in millions)
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Ohio
Indiana
Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Amount that if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate or regulatory liability(a)
$122
$8
$9
$6
$3
$1
$1
$4
Amount that if recognized, would affect the
effective tax rate or regulatory liability(a)
$59 $17 $18 $13 $5 $1 $2 $8 
(a)The Duke Energy Registrants are unable to estimate the specific amounts that would affect the effective tax rate
(a)    The Duke Energy Registrants are unable to estimate the specific amounts that would affect the ETR versus the regulatory liability.

235




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSINCOME TAXES


OTHER TAX MATTERS
The following tables include interest recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
 
 Duke
Progress
Energy
 
(in millions)  
Energy
Energy
Progress
Piedmont
Net interest income recognized related to income taxes$16
$1
$1
$
Interest receivable related to income taxes1



Interest payable related to income taxes1


1
 Year Ended December 31, 2018
   Duke
 Duke
Progress
Energy
(in millions)  
Energy
Energy
Progress
Net interest income recognized related to income taxes$2
$
$
Interest payable related to income taxes3
1
1
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
  Duke
 Duke
Duke
 Duke
Energy
Progress
Energy
Energy
(in millions)  
Energy
Carolinas
Energy
Progress
Florida
Net interest income recognized related to income taxes$
$
$1
$
$1
Net interest expense recognized related to income taxes
2



Interest payable related to income taxes5
25
1
1

Duke Energy and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to U.S. federal, examination for years before 2016. With few exceptions, Duke Energy and its subsidiaries are no longer subject to state, local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2016.2016, aside from certain state tax attributes carried forward for utilization in future years.

236




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSOTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES, NET


25. OTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES, NET
The components of Other income and expenses, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations are as follows.
 Year Ended December 31, 2019
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Interest income$31
 $1
 $11
 $
 $11
 $10
 $10
 $1
AFUDC equity139
 42
 66
 60
 6
 13
 18
 
Post in-service equity returns29
 20
 7
 7
 
 1
 
 
Nonoperating income, other231
 88
 57
 33
 31
 
 13
 19
Other income and expense, net$430
 $151
 $141
 $100
 $48
 $24
 $41
 $20
Year Ended December 31, 2018 Year Ended December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Interest income$20
 $1
 $18
 $1
 $18
 $7
 $9
 $1
Interest income$27 $2 $24 $4 $20 $11 $15 $19 
AFUDC equity221
 73
 104
 57
 47
 11
 32
 
AFUDC equity197 98 68 52 16 7 13 11 
Post in-service equity returns15
 9
 5
 5
 
 1
 
 
Post in-service equity returns34 14 18 18  1 1  
Nonoperating income, other143
 70
 38
 24
 21
 4
 4
 13
Nonoperating income, other134 107 71 40 38  7 16 
Other income and expense, net$399
 $153
 $165
 $87
 $86
 $23
 $45
 $14
Other income and expense, net$392 $221 $181 $114 $74 $19 $36 $46 
 Year Ended December 31, 2017  
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Interest income$13
 $2
 $6
 $2
 $5
 $6
 $8
 $
AFUDC equity237
 106
 92
 47
 45
 11
 28
 
Post in-service equity returns40
 28
 12
 12
 
 
 
 
Nonoperating income, other218
 63
 99
 54
 46
 6
 11
 (11)
Other income and expense, net$508
 $199
 $209
 $115
 $96
 $23
 $47
 $(11)

 Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Interest income$13 $$$$$$$19 
AFUDC equity171 65 51 34 16 27 20 
Post in-service equity returns39 21 16 16 — — 
Nonoperating income, other413 180 140 87 53 16 
Other income and expense, net$636 $270 $215 $143 $71 $18 $42 $55 
222

FINANCIAL STATEMENTSOTHER INCOME AND EXPENSES, NET
 Year Ended December 31, 2020
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Interest income$30 $$$$$$$17 
AFUDC equity154 62 42 29 12 23 19 
Post in-service equity returns27 17 — — 
Nonoperating income, other240 94 71 36 35 15 
Other income and expense, net$451 $177 $129 $75 $53 $16 $37 $51 
26. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
For information on subsequent events related to the adoption of the new credit losses accounting standard,dispositions, regulatory matters, commitments and contingencies, and debt and credit facilities see Notes 1,2, 4, 5 and 7, respectively.

237




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSQUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


27. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)
DUKE ENERGY
Quarterly EPS amounts may not sum to the full-year total due to changes in the weighted average number of common shares outstanding and rounding.
First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  FirstSecondThirdFourth
(in millions, except per share data)Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
(in millions, except per share data)QuarterQuarterQuarterQuarterTotal
2019         
20222022     
Operating revenuesOperating revenues$7,011 $6,564 $7,842 $7,351 $28,768 
Operating incomeOperating income1,314 1,448 2,056 1,194 6,012 
Income from continuing operationsIncome from continuing operations835 898 1,410 635 3,778 
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax(15)(18)3 (1,293)(1,323)
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)820 880 1,413 (658)2,455 
Net income (loss) available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholdersNet income (loss) available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders818 893 1,383 (650)2,444 
Earnings per share:Earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholdersIncome from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders     
Basic and dilutedBasic and diluted$1.06 $1.11 $1.78 $0.80 $4.74 
Income (Loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholdersIncome (Loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders 
Basic and dilutedBasic and diluted$0.02 $0.03 $0.03 $(1.66)$(1.57)
Net income (loss) available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholdersNet income (loss) available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders    
Basic and dilutedBasic and diluted$1.08 $1.14 $1.81 $(0.86)$3.17 
20212021     
Operating revenues$6,163
 $5,873
 $6,940
 $6,103
 $25,079
Operating revenues$6,032 $5,638 $6,834 $6,117 $24,621 
Operating income1,373
 1,298
 1,929
 1,109
 5,709
Operating income1,466 1,198 1,726 1,110 5,500 
Income from continuing operations893
 748
 1,323
 614
 3,578
Income from continuing operations967 723 1,333 700 3,723 
Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
 
 
 (7) (7)Loss from discontinued operations, net of tax(26)(25)(57)(36)(144)
Net income893
 748
 1,323
 607
 3,571
Net income941 698 1,276 664 3,579 
Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders900
 820
 1,327
 660
 3,707
Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders953 751 1,366 732 3,802 
Earnings per share:         Earnings per share:     
Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         Income from continuing operations available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders     
Basic and diluted$1.24
 $1.12
 $1.82
 $0.89
 $5.07
Basic and diluted$1.22 $0.90 $1.69 $0.86 $4.68 
Loss from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholdersIncome from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders 
Basic and diluted$
 $
 $
 $(0.01) $(0.01)Basic and diluted$0.03 $0.06 $0.10 $0.07 $0.26 
Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         Net income available to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders     
Basic and diluted$1.24
 $1.12
 $1.82
 $0.88
 $5.06
Basic and diluted$1.25 $0.96 $1.79 $0.93 $4.94 
2018         
Operating revenues$6,135
 $5,643
 $6,628
 $6,115
 $24,521
Operating income1,256
 979
 1,579
 871
 4,685
Income from continuing operations622
 507
 1,062
 434
 2,625
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations, net of tax
 (5) 4
 20
 19
Net income622
 502
 1,066
 454
 2,644
Net income attributable to Duke Energy Corporation620
 500
 1,082
 464
 2,666
Earnings per share:         
Income from continuing operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Basic and diluted$0.88
 $0.72
 $1.51
 $0.62
 $3.73
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Basic and diluted$
 $(0.01) $
 $0.03
 $0.03
Net income attributable to Duke Energy Corporation common stockholders         
Basic and diluted$0.88
 $0.71
 $1.51
 $0.65
 $3.76
The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during the two most recently completed fiscal years. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Impairment Charges (see Notes 4 and 13)$
 $
 $25
 $(14) $11
Total$
 $
 $25
 $(14) $11
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(17) $(20) $(16) $(31) $(84)
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts (see Note 4)(86) (179) 
 
 (265)
Sale of Retired Plant (see Note 3)(107) 
 
 
 (107)
Impairment Charges (see Notes 4, 12 and 13)(55) 
 (93) (60) (208)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (187) (187)
Impacts of the Tax Act (see Note 24)(76) 
 3
 53
 (20)
Total$(341) $(199) $(106) $(225) $(871)


238
223





FINANCIAL STATEMENTSQUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


DUKE ENERGY CAROLINASINDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$1,744
 $1,713
 $2,162
 $1,776
 $7,395
Operating income435
 451
 793
 347
 2,026
Net income293
 301
 590
 219
 1,403
2018         
Operating revenues$1,763
 $1,672
 $2,090
 $1,775
 $7,300
Operating income482
 224
 713
 241
 1,660
Net income323
 117
 496
 135
 1,071
The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during 2018. There were no unusual or infrequently occurring items for the year ended December 31, 2019. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(4) $(2) $(2) $(1) $(9)
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts (see Note 4)(19) (179) 
 
 (198)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (102) (102)
Impacts of the Tax Act (see Note 24)
 
 (1) 
 (1)
Total$(23) $(181) $(3) $(103) $(310)

PROGRESS ENERGY
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$2,572
 $2,744
 $3,242
 $2,644
 $11,202
Operating income488
 580
 786
 447
 2,301
Net income248
 329
 521
 229
 1,327
Net income attributable to Parent249
 328
 521
 229
 1,327
2018         
Operating revenues$2,576
 $2,498
 $3,045
 $2,609
 $10,728
Operating income447
 484
 663
 334
 1,928
Net income237
 267
 406
 123
 1,033
Net income attributable to Parent235
 265
 404
 123
 1,027
The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during the two most recently completed fiscal years. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Impairment Charges (see Note 4)$
 $
 $25
 $11
 $36
Total$
 $
 $25
 $11
 $36
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(4) $(3) $(1) $(2) $(10)
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts (see Note 4)(67) 
 
 
 (67)
Impairment Charges (see Note 4)
 
 
 (60) (60)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (69) (69)
Impacts of the Tax Act (see Note 24)(1) 
 (5) (19) (25)
Total$(72) $(3) $(6) $(150) $(231)


239




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSQUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$1,484
 $1,387
 $1,688
 $1,398
 $5,957
Operating income300
 259
 373
 236
 1,168
Net income203
 169
 278
 155
 805
2018         
Operating revenues$1,460
 $1,291
 $1,582
 $1,366
 $5,699
Operating income269
 233
 330
 227
 1,059
Net income177
 139
 216
 135
 667
The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during 2018. There were no unusual or infrequently occurring items for the year ended December 31, 2019. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(2) $(2) $(1) $(1) $(6)
Regulatory and Legislative Impacts (see Note 4)(67) 
 
 
 (67)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (52) (52)
Impacts of the Tax Act (see Note 24)
 
 (4) (15) (19)
Total$(69) $(2) $(5) $(68) $(144)

DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$1,086
 $1,353
 $1,548
 $1,244
 $5,231
Operating income188
 321
 413
 205
 1,127
Net income96
 201
 289
 106
 692
2018         
Operating revenues$1,115
 $1,203
 $1,462
 $1,241
 $5,021
Operating income173
 245
 331
 107
 856
Net income103
 168
 243
 40
 554

The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during the two most recently completed fiscal years. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Impairment Charges (see Note 4)$
 $
 $25
 $11
 $36
Total$
 $
 $25
 $11
 $36
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(2) $(1) $
 $(1) $(4)
Impairment Charges (see Note 4)
 
 
 (60) (60)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (17) (17)
Impacts of the Tax Act (see Note 24)
 
 (2) 2
 
Total$(2) $(1) $(2) $(76) $(81)


240




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSQUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


DUKE ENERGY OHIO
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$531
 $433
 $489
 $487
 $1,940
Operating income104
 74
 108
 78
 364
Net income69
 47
 74
 48
 238
2018         
Operating revenues$524
 $459
 $469
 $505
 $1,957
Operating (loss) income(21) 77
 139
 93
 288
Net (loss) income(25) 46
 100
 55
 176

The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during 2018. There were no unusual or infrequently occurring items for the year ended December 31, 2019. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(3) $(5) $
 $(6) $(14)
Sale of Retired Plant (see Note 3)(107) 
 
 
 (107)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (6) (6)
Impacts of the Tax Act (see Note 24)
 
 
 (2) (2)
Total$(110) $(5) $
 $(14) $(129)

DUKE ENERGY INDIANA
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$768
 $714
 $807
 $715
 $3,004
Operating income169
 148
 235
 133
 685
Net income110
 97
 156
 73
 436
2018         
Operating revenues$731
 $738
 $819
 $771
 $3,059
Operating income168
 169
 173
 133
 643
Net income100
 98
 119
 76
 393

The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during 2018. There were no unusual or infrequently occurring items for the year ended December 31, 2019. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)  
Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$
 $
 $(2) $
 $(2)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (7) (7)
Total$
 $
 $(2) $(7) $(9)


241




FINANCIAL STATEMENTSQUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA


PIEDMONT
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2019         
Operating revenues$579
 $209
 $168
 $425
 $1,381
Operating income (loss)172
 6
 (13) 139
 304
Net income (loss)122
 (7) (18) 105
 202
2018         
Operating revenues$553
 $215
 $172
 $435
 $1,375
Operating income (loss)161
 5
 (19) 79
 226
Net income (loss)110
 (8) (21) 48
 129
The following table includes unusual or infrequently occurring items in each quarter during 2018. There were no unusual or infrequently occurring items for the year ended December 31, 2019. All amounts discussed below are pretax.
 First
 Second
 Third
 Fourth
  
(in millions)Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Quarter
 Total
2018         
Costs to Achieve Piedmont Merger (see Note 2)$(6) $(9) $(11) $(22) $(48)
Severance Charges (see Note 21)
 
 
 (2) (2)
Total$(6) $(9) $(11) $(24) $(50)


242




INDEPENDENT ACCOUNTANTS


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None.

243




CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES


ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Duke Energy Registrants in the reports they file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified by the SEC rules and forms.
Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Duke Energy Registrants in the reports they file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Duke Energy Registrants have evaluated the effectiveness of their disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of December 31, 2019,2022, and, based upon this evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that these controls and procedures are effective in providing reasonable assurance of compliance.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the Duke Energy Registrants have evaluated changes in internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act) that occurred during the fiscal quarter ended December 31, 2019,2022, and have concluded no change has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, internal controlcontrols over financial reporting.
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
The Duke Energy Registrants’ management is responsible for establishing and maintaining an adequate system of internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). The Duke Energy Registrants’ internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with GAAP. Due to inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with policies and procedures may deteriorate.
The Duke Energy Registrants’ management, including their Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of their internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on the framework in the Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, management concluded that its internal controls over financial reporting were effective as of December 31, 2019.2022.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, Duke Energy’s independent registered public accounting firm, has issued an attestation report on the effectiveness of Duke Energy’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein. This report is not applicable to the Subsidiary Registrants as these companies are not accelerated or large accelerated filers.

224
244




REPORTS


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Duke Energy Corporation
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Duke Energy Corporation and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013)issued by COSO.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, of the Company and our report dated February 20, 2020,27, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte &and Touche LLP

Charlotte, North Carolina
February 20, 2020

27, 2023
245
225





OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Information regarding Duke Energy's Executive Officers is set forth in Part I, Item 1, "Business – Information about Our Executive Officers, of the Registrants," in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.Report. Duke Energy will provide information that is responsive to the remainder of this Item 10 in its definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. That information is incorporated in this Item 10 by reference.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Duke Energy will provide information that is responsive to this Item 11 in its definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. That information is incorporated in this Item 11 by reference.
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The following table shows information as of December 31, 2019,2022, about securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights under Duke Energy's equity compensation plans, along with the weighted average exercise price of the outstanding options, warrants and rights and the number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the plans.
Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)(1)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
Plan Category
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(a)
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
(b)(1)
Number of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column (a))
(c)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders3,528,022
(2) 
n/a5,248,541
(3) 
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders3,385,638 (2)n/a2,410,473(3)
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders180,188
(4) 
n/a
(5) 
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders109,690 (4)n/an/a(5)
Total3,708,210
 n/a5,248,541 Total3,495,328 n/a2,410,473
(1)As of December 31, 2019, no options were outstanding under equity compensation plans.
(2)Includes RSUs and performance shares (assuming the maximum payout level) granted under the Duke Energy Corporation 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as well as shares that could be payable with respect to certain compensation deferred under the Duke Energy Corporation Executive Savings Plan (Executive Savings Plan) or the Directors’ Savings Plan.
(3)Includes shares remaining available for issuance pursuant to stock awards under the Duke Energy Corporation 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(4)Includes shares that could be payable with respect to certain compensation deferred under the Executive Savings Plan or the Duke Energy Corporation Directors' Savings Plan (Directors' Savings Plan), each of which is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan described in more detail below.
(5)The number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans not approved by security holders cannot be determined because it is based on the amount of future voluntary deferrals, if any, under the Executive Savings Plan and the Directors' Savings Plan.
(1)    As of December 31, 2022, no options were outstanding under equity compensation plans.
(2)    Includes RSUs and performance shares (assuming the maximum payout level) granted under the Duke Energy Corporation 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan, as well as shares that could be payable with respect to certain compensation deferred under the Duke Energy Corporation Executive Savings Plan (Executive Savings Plan) or the Directors’ Savings Plan.
(3)    Includes shares remaining available for issuance pursuant to stock awards under the Duke Energy Corporation 2015 Long-Term Incentive Plan.
(4)    Includes shares that could be payable with respect to certain compensation deferred under the Executive Savings Plan or the Duke Energy Corporation Directors' Savings Plan (Directors' Savings Plan), each of which is a non-qualified deferred compensation plan described in more detail below.
(5)    The number of shares remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans not approved by security holders cannot be determined because it is based on the amount of future voluntary deferrals, if any, under the Executive Savings Plan and the Directors' Savings Plan.
Under the Executive Savings Plan, participants can elect to defer a portion of their base salary and short‑term incentive compensation. Participants also receive a company matching contribution in excess of the contribution limits prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code under the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan, which is the 401(k) plan in which employees are generally eligible to participate. Eligible participants may also earn pay credits based on age and length of service on eligible earnings that exceed limits prescribed by the Internal Revenue Code.
In general, payments are made following termination of employment or death in the form of a lump sum or installments, as selected by the participant. Participants may direct the deemed investment of base salary deferrals, short-term incentive compensation deferrals and matching contributionstheir accounts (with certain exceptions) among investment options available under the Duke Energy Retirement Savings Plan, including the Duke Energy Common Stock Fund. Participants may change their investment elections on a daily basis. Deferrals of equity awards are credited with earnings and losses based on the performance of the Duke Energy Common Stock Fund. The benefits payable under the plan are unfunded and subject to the claims of Duke Energy’s creditors.
Under the Directors’ Savings Plan, outside directors may elect to defer all or a portion of their annual compensation, generally consisting of retainers. Deferred amounts are credited to an unfunded account, the balance of which is adjusted for the performance of phantom investment options, including the Duke Energy Common Stock Fund, as elected by the director, and generally are paid when the director terminates his or her service from the Board of Directors.
Duke Energy will provide additional information that is responsive to this Item 12 in its definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. That information is incorporated in this Item 12 by reference.

246




OTHER INFORMATION


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Duke Energy will provide information that is responsive to this Item 13 in its definitive proxy statement or in an amendment to this Annual Report not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report. That information is incorporated in this Item 13 by reference.
226

OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
Deloitte provided professional services to the Duke Energy Registrants. The following tables present the Deloitte fees for services rendered to the Duke Energy Registrants during 20192022 and 2018.
 Year Ended December 31, 2019  
   Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  
 Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  
(in millions)  
Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
Types of Fees  
               
Audit Fees(a)
$13.5
 $4.6
 $5.3
 $3.1
 $2.2
 $0.9
 $1.4
 $0.8
Audit-Related Fees(b)
0.6
 0.1
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
 0.2
 
 
Tax Fees(c)
0.2
 0.1
 0.1
 
 
 
 
 
Total Fees$14.3
 $4.8
 $5.6
 $3.2
 $2.3
 $1.1
 $1.4
 $0.8
2021.
Year Ended December 31, 2018   Year Ended December 31, 2022
  Duke
   Duke
 Duke
 Duke
 Duke
  DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
Duke
 Energy
 Progress
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
 Energy
  DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)
Energy
 Carolinas
 Energy
 Progress
 Florida
 Ohio
 Indiana
 Piedmont
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Types of Fees
               Types of Fees       
Audit Fees(a)
$14.0
 $5.0
 $5.5
 $3.3
 $2.2
 $0.9
 $1.4
 $0.8
Audit Fees(a)
$13.7 $3.2 $4.9 $2.5 $2.4 $2.0 $1.8 $1.3 
Audit-Related Fees(b)
0.4
 
 0.1
 
 0.1
 
 
 
Audit-Related Fees(b)
1.7 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2   
Tax Fees(c)
0.6
 0.2
 0.2
 0.1
 0.1
 
 0.1
 0.1
Total Fees$15.0
 $5.2
 $5.8
 $3.4
 $2.4
 $0.9
 $1.5
 $0.9
Total Fees$15.4 $3.3 $5.1 $2.6 $2.5 $2.2 $1.8 $1.3 
 Year Ended December 31, 2021
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
DukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
(in millions)EnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
Types of Fees       
Audit Fees(a)
$13.2 $3.1 $4.7 $2.4 $2.3 $1.9 $1.7 $1.3 
Audit-Related Fees(b)
1.5 0.1 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.2 — — 
Total Fees$14.7 $3.2 $4.9 $2.5 $2.4 $2.1 $1.7 $1.3 
(a)Audit Fees are fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte for professional services for the financial statement audits, audit of the Duke Energy Registrants’ financial statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K, reviews of financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, and services associated with securities filings such as comfort letters and consents.
(b)Audit-Related Fees are fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of an audit or review of financial statements, including statutory reporting requirements.
(c)Tax Fees are fees billed by Deloitte for tax return assistance and preparation, tax examination assistance and professional services related to tax planning and tax strategy.
(a)    Audit Fees are fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte for professional services for the financial statement audits, audit of the Duke Energy Registrants’ financial statements included in Duke Energy's Annual Report on Form 10-K, reviews of financial statements included in Quarterly Reports on Form 10‑Q, and services associated with securities filings such as comfort letters and consents.
(b)    Audit-Related Fees are fees billed, or expected to be billed, by Deloitte for assurance and related services that are reasonably related to the performance of an audit or review of financial statements, including statutory reporting requirements.
To safeguard the continued independence of the independent auditor, the Audit Committee of Duke Energy adopted a policy that all services provided by the independent auditor require preapproval by the Audit Committee. Pursuant to the policy, certain audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services have been specifically preapproved up to fee limits. In the event the cost of any of these services may exceed the fee limits, the Audit Committee must specifically approve the service. All services performed in 20192022 and 20182021 by the independent accountant were approved by the Audit Committee pursuant to the preapproval policy.

227
247


EXHIBITS


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)Consolidated Financial Statements, Supplemental Financial Data and Supplemental Schedules included in Part II of this Annual Report are as follows:
(a)     Consolidated Financial Statements and Supplemental Schedules included in Part II of this Annual Report are as follows:
Duke Energy Corporation
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
Progress Energy, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
Duke Energy Progress, LLC
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
Duke Energy Florida, LLC
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.

248


EXHIBITS


Duke Energy Ohio, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019, and 2018
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
Duke Energy Indiana, LLCOhio, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited,Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in Note 27the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
228

EXHIBITS
Duke Energy Indiana, LLC
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022, and 2021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements)Statements
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.
Piedmont Natural Gas Company, Inc.
Consolidated Financial Statements
Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022, and 20182021
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022, 2021 and 20172020
Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
Quarterly Financial Data, (unaudited, included in Note 27 to the Consolidated Financial Statements)
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
All other schedules are omitted because they are not required, or because the required information is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes.

229
249




EXHIBITS


EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibits filed herewithinherewith are designated by an asterisk (*). All exhibits not so designated are incorporated by reference to a prior filing, as indicated. Items constituting management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements are designated by a double asterisk (**). The Company agrees to furnish upon request to the Commissioncommission a copy of any omitted schedules or exhibits upon request on all items designated by a triple asterisk (***).
DukeDukeDukeDukeDuke
ExhibitDukeEnergyProgressEnergyEnergyEnergyEnergy
NumberEnergyCarolinasEnergyProgressFloridaOhioIndianaPiedmont
2.1XX
2.2XX
3.1X
3.2X
3.33.2.1X
3.3X
3.3.1X
3.4X
3.4.1X
3.5X
3.5.1X
3.5.2X
3.5.3X
3.5.4X
3.6X
3.7X
3.8X
3.8.1X
3.8.2X
3.9X
3.9.1X
3.9.2X
3.9.3X
3.10X
3.10.1
X
3.10.2X
3.10.3X
3.11X
3.11.1X
3.12

X
3.13

X
3.14X
3.15X
3.16X
3.17

X
3.18

X
3.19X
3.20X
4.1X
4.1.1X
4.1.2X
4.1.3X
4.1.4X
4.1.5X
4.1.6X
4.1.7X
4.1.8X
4.1.9X
4.1.10X
4.1.11X
4.1.12X
4.1.13X
4.1.14X
4.1.15X
4.1.16X
4.1.17X
4.1.18X
4.1.19

X
4.1.20X
4.1.21

X
4.1.22


X
4.24.1.23X
4.1.24X
4.1.25X
4.1.26X
4.1.27X
4.1.28X
4.1.29X
4.2X
4.2.1X
4.2.2X
4.3First and Refunding Mortgage from Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC to The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., successor trustee to Guaranty Trust Company of New York, dated as of December 1, 1927 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(a) to registrant's Form S-1, effective October 15, 1947, File No. 2-7224).X
4.3.1X
4.3.2Ninth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1949 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 7(j) to registrant's Form S-1 filed on February 3, 1949, File No. 2-7808).X
4.3.3Twentieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 15, 1964 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-B-20 to registrant's Form S-1 filed on August 23, 1966, File No. 2-25367).X
4.3.4Twenty-third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of February 1, 1968 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2-B-26 to registrant's Form S-9 filed on January 21, 1969, File No. 2-31304).X
4.3.5Sixtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 1, 1990 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-B-61 to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1990, File No.1-4928).X
4.3.6Sixty-third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4-B-64 to registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on February 13, 1992, File No. 33-45501).X
4.3.7X
4.3.8X
4.3.9X
4.3.10X
4.3.11X
4.3.12X
4.3.13X
4.3.14X
4.3.15X
4.3.16X
4.3.17X
4.3.18X
4.3.19X
4.3.20X
4.3.21

X
4.44.3.22X
4.3.23X
4.3.24X
4.3.25X
4.4Mortgage and Deed of Trust between Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (formerly Carolina Power & Light Company) and The Bank of New York Mellon (formerly Irving Trust Company) and Frederick G. Herbst (Tina D. Gonzalez, successor), as Trustees, dated as of May 1, 1940.X
4.4.1First through Fifth Supplemental Indentures thereto (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(b), File No. 2-64189).X
4.4.2Sixth Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1960 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(b)-5, File No. 2-16210).X
4.4.3Seventh Supplemental Indenture dated November 1, 1961 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(b)-6, File No. 2-16210).X
4.4.4Eighth Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 1964 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)-8, File No. 2-19118).X
4.4.5Ninth Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1966 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)-2, File No. 2-22439).X
4.4.6Tenth Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1967 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)-2, File No. 2-24624).X
4.4.7Eleventh Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1968 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-27297).X
4.4.8Twelfth Supplemental Indenture dated January 1, 1970 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-30172).X
4.4.9Thirteenth Supplemental Indenture dated August 1, 1970 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-35694).X
4.4.10Fourteenth Supplemental Indenture dated January 1, 1971 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-37505).X
4.4.11Fifteenth Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1971 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-39002).X
4.4.12Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture dated May 1, 1972 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-41738).X
4.4.13Seventeenth Supplemental Indenture dated November 1, 1973 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-43439).X
4.4.14Eighteenth Supplemental Indenture dated (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-47751).X
4.4.15Nineteenth Supplemental Indenture dated May 1, 1974 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-49347).X
4.4.16Twentieth Supplemental Indenture dated December 1, 1974 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-53113).X
4.4.17Twenty-first Supplemental Indenture dated April 15, 1975 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(d), File No. 2-53113).X
4.4.18Twenty-second Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1977 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-59511).X
4.4.19Twenty-third Supplemental Indenture dated June 1, 1978 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-61611).X
4.4.20Twenty-fourth Supplemental Indenture dated May 15, 1979 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(d), File No. 2-64189).X
4.4.21Twenty-fifth Supplemental Indenture dated November 1, 1979 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-65514).X
4.4.22Twenty-sixth Supplemental Indenture dated November 1, 1979 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2(c), File No. 2-66851).X
4.4.23Twenty-seventh Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1980 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 (d), File No. 2-66851).X
4.4.24Twenty-eighth Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1980 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)-1, File No. 2-81299).X
4.4.25Twenty-ninth Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1980 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)-2, File No. 2-81299).X
4.4.26Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture dated December 1, 1982 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b)- 3, File No. 2-81299).X
4.4.27Thirty-first Supplemental Indenture dated March 15, 1983 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-1, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.28Thirty-second Supplemental Indenture dated March 15, 1983 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-2, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.29Thirty-third Supplemental Indenture dated December 1, 1983 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-3, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.30Thirty-fourth Supplemental Indenture dated December 15, 1983 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-4, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.31Thirty-fifth Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-5, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.32Thirty-sixth Supplemental Indenture dated June 1, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-6, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.33Thirty-seventh Supplemental Indenture dated June 1, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)-7, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.34Thirty-eighth Supplemental Indenture dated June 1, 1984 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c)- 8, File No. 2-95505).X
4.4.35Thirty-ninth Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1985 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.36Fortieth Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1985 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.37Forty-first Supplemental Indenture dated March 1, 1986 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.38Forty-second Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 1986 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.39Forty-third Supplemental Indenture dated January 1, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(f), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.40Forty-fourth Supplemental Indenture dated December 1, 1987 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(g), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.41Forty-fifth supplementalSupplemental Indenture dated September 1, 1988 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h), File No. 33-25560).X
4.4.42Forty-sixth Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b), File No. 33-33431).X
4.4.43Forty-seventh Supplemental Indenture dated August 1, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c), File No. 33-33431).X
4.4.44Forty-eighth Supplemental Indenture dated November 15, 1990 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b), File No. 33-38298).X
4.4.45Forty-ninth Supplemental Indenture dated November 15, 1990 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c), File No. 33-38298).X
4.4.46Fiftieth Supplemental Indenture dated February 15, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(h), File No. 33-42869).X
4.4.47Fifty-first Supplemental Indenture dated April 1, 1991 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(i), File No. 33-42869).X
4.4.48Fifty-second Supplemental Indenture dated September 15, 1991(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e), File No. 33-48607).X
4.4.49Fifty-third Supplemental Indenture dated January 1, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(f), File No. 33-48607).X
4.4.50Fifty-fourth Supplemental Indenture dated April 15, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4 (g), File No. 33-48607).X
4.4.51Fifty-fifth Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e), File No. 33-55060).X
4.4.52Fifty-sixth Supplemental Indenture dated October 1, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(f), File No. 33-55060).X
4.4.53Fifty-seventh Supplemental Indenture dated February 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e), File No. 33-60014).X
4.4.54Fifty-eighth Supplemental Indenture dated March 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(f), File No. 33-60014).X
4.4.55Fifty-ninth Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(a) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1, File No. 33-38349).X
4.4.56Sixtieth Supplemental Indenture dated July 1, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 1, File No. 33-38349).X
4.4.57Sixty-first Supplemental Indenture dated August 15, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(e), File No. 33-50597).X
4.4.58X
4.4.59X
4.4.60X
4.4.61X
4.4.62X
4.4.63X
4.4.64X
4.4.65X
4.4.66X
4.4.67X
4.4.68X
4.4.69X
4.4.70X
4.4.71X
4.4.72X
4.4.73X
4.4.74X
4.4.75X
4.4.76X
4.4.77X
4.4.78X
4.4.79X
4.4.80X
4.4.81X
4.4.82

X
4.54.4.83X
4.4.84X
4.4.85X
4.4.86X
4.5X
4.6X
4.7Indenture (for First Mortgage Bonds) between Duke Energy Florida, Inc. (formerly Florida Power Corporation) and The Bank of New York Mellon (as successor to Guaranty Trust Company of New York and The Florida National Bank of Jacksonville), as Trustee, dated as of January 1, 1944, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit B-18 to registrant's Form A-2, File No. 2-5293).X
4.7.1Seventh Supplemental Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(b) to Duke Energy Florida, Inc.'s (formerly Florida Power Corporation) Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 27, 1991, File No. 33-16788).X
4.7.2Eighth Supplemental Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Duke Energy Florida, Inc.'s (formerly Florida Power Corporation) Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 27, 1991, File No. 33-16788).X
4.7.3Sixteenth Supplemental Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(d) to Duke Energy Florida, Inc.'s (formerly Florida Power Corporation) Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 27, 1991, File No. 33-16788).X
4.7.4Twenty-ninth Supplemental Indenture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4(c) to Duke Energy Florida, Inc.'s (formerly Florida Power Corporation) Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed on September 17, 1982, File No. 2-79832).X
4.7.5X
4.7.6X
4.7.7X
4.7.8�� X
4.7.9X
4.7.10X
4.7.11X
4.7.12X
4.7.13X
4.7.14X
4.7.15X
4.7.16X
4.7.17

X
4.7.18X
4.84.7.19X
4.7.20X
4.8X
4.8.1X
4.8.2

X
4.9X
4.10X
4.10.1X
4.10.2X
4.11Original Indenture (First Mortgage Bonds) between Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (formerly The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company) and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, N.A., as Successor Trustee, dated as of August 1, 1936 (incorporated by reference to an exhibit to registrant's Registration Statement No. 2-2374).X
4.11.1X
4.11.2X
4.11.3X
4.11.4X
4.11.5X
4.124.11.6X
4.12X
4.12.1X
4.12.2X
4.12.3X
4.12.4X
4.13Original Indenture (First Mortgage Bonds) between Duke Energy Indiana, LLC (formerly PSI Energy, Inc.) and Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, as Successor Trustee, dated as of September 1, 1939, (filed as an exhibit in File No. 70-258).X
4.13.1Tenth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 1, 1952, (filed as an exhibit in File No. 2-9687).X
4.13.2Twenty-third Supplemental Indenture, dated as of January 1, 1977, (filed as an exhibit in File No. 2-57828).X
4.13.3Twenty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1978, (filed as an exhibit in File No. 2-62543).X
4.13.4Twenty-sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of September 1, 1978, (filed as an exhibit in File No. 2-62543).X
4.13.5Thirtieth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of August 1, 1980, (filed as an exhibit in File No. 2-68562).X
4.13.6Thirty-fifth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 30, 1984, (filed as an exhibit to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1984, File No. 1-3543).X
4.13.7Forty-sixth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of June 1, 1990, (filed as an exhibit to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991, File No. 1-3543).X
4.13.8Forty-seventh Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1991, (filed as an exhibit to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1991, File No. 1-3543).X
4.13.9Forty-eighth Supplemental Indenture, dated as of July 15, 1992, (filed as an exhibit to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, File No. 1-3543).X
4.13.10X
4.13.11X
4.13.12X
4.13.13X
4.13.14X
4.13.15X
4.13.16X
4.13.17X
4.13.18X
4.13.19X
4.13.20X
4.13.21X
4.13.22X
4.13.23X
4.144.13.24X
4.14Repayment Agreement between Duke Energy Ohio, Inc. (formerly The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company) and The Dayton Power and Light Company, dated as of December 23, 1992, (filed with registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 1992, File No. 1-1232).X
4.15X
4.16X
4.17X
4.18X
4.19X
4.20X
4.21X
4.22X
4.23X
4.24X
4.25X
4.26X
4.26.1X
4.26.2X
4.26.3X
4.26.4X
4.26.5X
4.26.6X
4.26.7

X
4.274.26.8X
4.26.9X
4.26.10X
4.27Medium-Term Note, Series A, dated as of October 6, 1993 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.8 to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended October 31, 1993, File No. 1-06196).X
4.28X
4.29X
4.30X
4.31X
4.32X
4.33X
4.34X
10.1X
10.2X
10.3X
10.4X
10.5X
10.6X
10.7X
10.8X
10.9X
10.10X
10.11**X
10.1210.12**X
10.13XX
10.13*10.14**X
10.1410.15
$6,000,000,000 Five-Year Credit Agreement between Duke Energy Corporation, Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC, Duke Energy Ohio, Inc., Duke Energy Indiana, LLC, Duke Energy Kentucky, Inc., Carolina Power and Light Company d/b/a Duke Energy Progress, Inc. and Florida Power Corporation, d/b/a Duke Energy Florida, Inc., as Borrowers, the lenders listed therein, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as Administrative Agent, Bank of America, N.A. and The Royal Bank of Scotland plc, as Co-Syndication Agents and Bank of China, New York Branch, Barclays Bank PLC, Citibank, N.A., Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Limited, New York Branch, JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. and UBS Securities LLC, as Co-Documentation Agents, dated as of November 18, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 25, 2011, File Nos. 1-32853, 1-4928, 1-1232 and 1-3543).
XXXX
10.14.110.15.1XXXXXX
10.14.210.15.2XXXXXX
10.14.310.15.3XXXXXXX
10.14.410.15.4XXXXXXX
10.15**10.15.5X
10.15.1**XXXXXXX
10.16**X
10.16.1**X
10.17**X
10.18**X
10.19**X
10.20**X
10.21**X
10.22**X
10.23*10.20**X
*10.21**X
10.22**X
10.2410.23**X
*10.24**X
10.25X
10.2510.26X
10.2610.27XX
10.27**10.28XXX
10.29XXX
10.30XX
10.31X
10.32**X
10.28*10.33**X
10.2910.33.1**X
10.34Purchase, Construction and Ownership Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1981, between Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (formerly Carolina Power & Light Company) and North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 3 and Exhibits, together with resolution, dated as of December 16, 1981, changing name to North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, amending letter, dated as of February 18, 1982, and amendment, dated as of February 24, 1982 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to registrant's File No. 33-25560).X
10.3010.35Operating and Fuel Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1981, between Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (formerly Carolina Power & Light Company) and North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 3 and Exhibits, together with resolution, dated as of December 16, 1981, changing name to North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency, amending letters, dated as of August 21, 1981, and December 15, 1981, and amendment, dated as of February 24, 1982 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to registrant's File No. 33-25560).X
10.3110.36Power Coordination Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1981, between Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (formerly Carolina Power & Light Company) and North Carolina Municipal Power Agency Number 3 and Exhibits, together with resolution, dated as of December 16, 1981, changing name to North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency and amending letter, dated as of January 29, 1982 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(c) to registrant's File No. 33-25560).X
10.3210.37Amendment, dated as of December 16, 1982, to Purchase, Construction and Ownership Agreement, dated as of July 30, 1981, between Duke Energy Progress, Inc. (formerly Carolina Power & Light Company) and North Carolina Eastern Municipal Power Agency (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(d) to registrant's File No. 33-25560).X
10.33**10.38X
10.34XX
10.3510.39XX
10.36*10.40**X
10.36.1*10.40.1**X
10.37*10.41**X
10.38*10.42**X
10.39*10.43**X
10.44**X
10.39.110.44.1**X
10.4010.44.2**X
10.45**X
10.46**X
10.47XX
10.4110.48XX
10.42X
10.4310.49X
10.4410.50X
10.4510.51X
10.4610.52X
10.4710.53X
10.48**10.54X
10.49**X
10.50**X
10.50.1**X
10.51**X
10.52**X
10.53**X
*10.54**X
10.55X
10.5610.55

X
10.5710.55.1X
10.56XXXXXXX
10.57X
10.58X
10.59X
10.60X
10.61X
10.5810.62X
10.58.110.62.1X
10.58.210.62.2X
10.5910.63X
10.6010.64X
10.6110.65XX
10.66X
10.6210.67

X
10.6310.68X
*10.6410.69X
*10.6510.70X
*2110.71X
*21X
*23.1.1X
*23.1.2X
*23.1.3X
*23.1.4X
*23.1.5X
*23.1.6X
*23.1.7X
*24.1X
*24.2X
*31.1.1X
*31.1.2X
*31.1.3X
*31.1.4X
*31.1.5X
*31.1.6X
*31.1.7X
*31.1.8X
*31.2.1X
*31.2.2X
*31.2.3X
*31.2.4X
*31.2.5X
*31.2.6X
*31.2.7X
*31.2.8X
*32.1.1X
*32.1.2X
*32.1.3X
*32.1.4X
*32.1.5X
*32.1.6X
*32.1.7X
*32.1.8X
*32.2.1X
*32.2.2X
*32.2.3X
*32.2.4X
*32.2.5X
*32.2.6X
*32.2.7X
*32.2.8X
*101.INSXBRL Instance Document (this does not appear in the Interactive Data File because it's XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document).XXXXXXXX
*101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema DocumentXXXXXXXX
*101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Calculation Linkbase DocumentXXXXXXXX
*101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Label Linkbase DocumentXXXXXXXX
*101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Presentation Linkbase DocumentXXXXXXXX
*101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Definition Linkbase DocumentXXXXXXXX
*104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted in Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101).XXXXXXXX
The total amount of securities of each respective registrant or its subsidiaries authorized under any instrument with respect to long-term debt not filed as an exhibit does not exceed 10% of the total assets of such registrant and its subsidiaries on a consolidated basis. Each registrant agrees, upon request of the SEC, to furnish copies of any or all of such instruments to it.

E-1





SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrants have duly caused this report to be signed on their behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKE ENERGY CORPORATION
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chairman,
Chair,
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chairman,Chair, President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer and Director)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
Michael G. Browning*Derrick Burks*William E. Kennard*Lynn J. Good*
Annette K. Clayton*E. Marie McKee*John T. Herron*
Theodore F. Craver, Jr.*Charles W. Moorman IV*Idalene F. Kesner*
Robert M. Davis*Marya M. Rose*E. Marie McKee*
Daniel R. DiMicco*Caroline D. Dorsa*Carlos A. Saladrigas*Michael J. Pacilio*
W. Roy Dunbar*Thomas E. Skains*
Nicholas C. Fanandakis*Thomas E. Skains*
Lynn J. Good*William E. Webster, Jr.*
John T. Herron*
Steven K. Young,Brian D. Savoy, by signing his name hereto, does hereby sign this document on behalf of the registrant and on behalf of each of the above-named persons previously indicated by asterisk (*) pursuant to a power of attorney duly executed by the registrant and such persons, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as an exhibit hereto.
By:/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Attorney-In-Fact
 Date: February 20, 202027, 2023

E-2




SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 27, 2023
DUKE ENERGY CAROLINAS, LLC
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ BRIAN D. SAVOY
Brian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ CYNTHIA S. LEE
Cynthia S. Lee
Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMIL
Dhiaa M. Jamil
/s/ JULIA S. JANSON
Julia S. Janson
Date: February 27, 2023
E-3


SIGNATURES
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKEPROGRESS ENERGY, CAROLINAS, LLCINC.
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ KODWO GHARTEY-TAGOE
Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe
/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMIL
Dhiaa M. Jamil
/s/ JULIA S. JANSON
Julia S. Janson
Date: February 20, 2020

27, 2023
E-3
E-4




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS, ENERGY, INC.LLC
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ KODWO GHARTEY-TAGOE
Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe
/s/ R. ALEXANDER GLENN
R. Alexander Glenn
/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMIL
Dhiaa M. Jamil
/s/ JULIA S. JANSON
Julia S. Janson
Date: February 20, 2020

27, 2023
E-4
E-5




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKE ENERGY PROGRESS,FLORIDA, LLC
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ DOUGLAS F ESAMANN
Douglas F Esamann
/s/ KODWO GHARTEY-TAGOE
Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe
/s/ R. ALEXANDER GLENN
R. Alexander Glenn
/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMIL
Dhiaa M. Jamil
/s/ JULIA S. JANSON
Julia S. Janson
Date: February 20, 2020

27, 2023
E-5
E-6




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKE ENERGY FLORIDA, LLCOHIO, INC.
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ DOUGLAS F ESAMANNR. ALEXANDER GLENN
Douglas F EsamannR. Alexander Glenn
/s/ KODWO GHARTEY-TAGOE
Kodwo Ghartey-Tagoe
/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMIL
Dhiaa M. Jamil
/s/ JULIA S. JANSON
Julia S. Janson
Date: February 20, 2020

27, 2023
E-6
E-7




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKE ENERGY OHIO, INC.INDIANA, LLC
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ DOUGLAS F ESAMANNR. ALEXANDER GLENN
Douglas F EsamannR. Alexander Glenn
/s/ LYNN J. GOODKELLEY A. KARN
Lynn J. GoodKelley A. Karn
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMILSTAN PINEGAR
Dhiaa M. JamilStan Pinegar
Date: February 20, 2020

27, 2023
E-7
E-8




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023
DUKE ENERGY INDIANA, LLCPIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNGBRIAN D. SAVOY
Steven K. YoungBrian D. Savoy
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBSCYNTHIA S. LEE
Dwight L. JacobsCynthia S. Lee
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ DOUGLAS F ESAMANN
Douglas F Esamann
/s/ KELLEY A. KARN
Kelley A. Karn
/s/ STAN PINEGAR
Stan Pinegar
Date: February 20, 2020

E-8




SIGNATURES


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 20, 2020
PIEDMONT NATURAL GAS COMPANY, INC.
(Registrant)
By:/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the date indicated.
(i)/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
(ii)/s/ STEVEN K. YOUNG
Steven K. Young
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer)
(iii)/s/ DWIGHT L. JACOBS
Dwight L. Jacobs
Senior Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, Tax and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)
(iv)Directors:
/s/ DOUGLAS F ESAMANN
Douglas F Esamann
/s/ LYNN J. GOOD
Lynn J. Good
/s/ DHIAA M. JAMIL
Dhiaa M. Jamil
/s/ BRIAN D. SAVOY
Brian D. Savoy
Date: February 20, 202027, 2023


E-9