UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

  FORM 10-K
 (Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192020
or
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from             to             .             

Commission file number 000-51404
  FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter) 
Federally Chartered Corporation35-6001443
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS employer identification number)
 8250 Woodfield Crossing Blvd. Indianapolis, IN46240
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip code)
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (317) 465-0200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
NoneNoneNone

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Class B capital stock, par value $100 per share
(Title of class)
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.     o  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.     x  Yes    o  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).   x  Yes     o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer," "smaller reporting company," and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
o
Large accelerated filer
o
Accelerated filer
o
Emerging growth company
x Non-accelerated filer
oNon-accelerated filer
Smaller reporting company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation on its management's assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.                                Yes    o  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes    x  No
Registrant's Class B stock is not publicly traded and is only issued to members of the registrant. Such stock is issued and redeemed at par value, $100 per share, subject to certain regulatory and statutory limits. At June 30, 2019,2020, the aggregate par value of the Class B stock held by members and former members of the registrant was approximately $2.2 billion.$2.5 billion. At February 29, 2020, 23,240,48928, 2021, including mandatorily redeemable capital stock, we had 0 outstanding shares of Class A stock and 24,441,185 outstanding shares of Class B stock were outstanding.stock.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None.



Table of Contents
Page
Number
Defined Terms
Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
Operating Segments
Funding Sources
Affordable Housing Programs, Community Investment and Small Business Grants
Use of Derivatives
Supervision and Regulation
Membership
Competition
EmployeesHuman Capital Resources
Available Information
ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1B.UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Executive Summary
Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition
Operating Segments
Analysis of Financial Condition
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
Contractual Obligations
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments
Risk Management
 ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
 ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
 ITEM 9.CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
 ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 ITEM 9B.OTHER INFORMATION
 ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
 ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
 ITEM 15.EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
 ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY




DEFINED TERMS

2005 SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended
ABS: Asset-Backed Securities
Advance: Secured loan to members, former members or Housing Associates
AFS: Available-for-Sale
Agency: GSE and Ginnie Mae
AHP: Affordable Housing Program
AMA: Acquired Member Assets
AOCI: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Bank Act: Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended
bps: basis points
CARES Act: Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
CDFI: Community Development Financial Institution
CE: Credit Enhancement
CFI: Community Financial Institution, an FDIC-insured depository institution with average total assets below an annually- adjusted limit established by the Finance Agency Director based on the Consumer Price Index
CFPB: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
CFTC: United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Clearinghouse: A United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission-registered derivatives clearing organization
CME: CME Clearing
CMO: Collateralized Mortgage Obligation
CO bond: Consolidated Obligation bond
COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019
DB Plan: Pentegra Defined Benefit Pension Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended
DC Plan: Collectively, the Pentegra Defined Contribution Retirement Savings Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended, in effect through October 1, 2020 and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Retirement Savings Plan, commencing October 2, 2020
DDCP: Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan
Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended
EFFR: Effective Federal Funds Rate
Exchange Act: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
FCA: Financial Conduct Authority
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA: Federal Housing Administration
FHLBank: A Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLBanks: The 11 Federal Home Loan Banks or a subset thereof
FHLBank System: The 11 Federal Home Loan Banks and the Office of Finance
FICO®: Fair Isaac Corporation, the creators of the FICO credit score
Final Membership Rule: Final Rule on FHLBank Membership issued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency effective February 19, 2016
Finance Agency: Federal Housing Finance Agency, successor to Finance Board
Finance Board: Federal Housing Finance Board, predecessor to Finance Agency
FLA: First Loss Account
FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee
Form 8-K: Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
Form 10-K: Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
Form 10-Q: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
FRB: Federal Reserve Board
Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Frozen SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, frozen effective December 31, 2004
GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association
GLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, as amended
GSE: United States Government-Sponsored Enterprise
HERA: Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, as amended
Housing Associate: Approved lender under Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934 that is either a government agency or is chartered under federal or state law with rights and powers similar to those of a corporation
3
Table of Contents


HTM: Held-to-Maturity
HUD: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
JCE Agreement: Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended, among the 11 FHLBanks
KESP: Key Employee Severance Policy
LCH: LCH.Clearnet LLC
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
LRA: Lender Risk Account
3
Table of Contents


LTV: Loan-to-Value
MAP-21: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, enacted on July 6, 2012
MBS: Mortgage-Backed Securities
MCC: Master Commitment Contract
MDC: Mandatory Delivery Commitment
Moody's: Moody's Investor Services
MPF: Mortgage Partnership Finance®
MPP: Mortgage Purchase Program, including Original and Advantage unless indicated otherwise
MRCS: Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock
MVE: Market Value of Equity
NRSRO: Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization
OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI: Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
OIS: Overnight-Indexed Swap
ORERC: Other Real Estate-Related Collateral
OTTI: Other-Than-Temporary Impairment or -Temporarily Impaired (as the context indicates)
PFI: Participating Financial Institution
PMI: Primary Mortgage Insurance
REMIC: Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
REO: Real Estate Owned
RMBS: Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
S&P: Standard & Poor's Rating Service
Safety and Soundness Act: Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended
SBA: Small Business Administration
SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Act: Securities Act of 1933, as amended
SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of IndianapolisCollectively, the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and/or a similar frozen planSERP and the Frozen SERP
SETP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis 2016 Supplemental Executive Thrift Plan, as amended and restated
SMI: Supplemental Mortgage Insurance
SOFR: Secured Overnight Financing Rate
TBA: To Be Announced, a forward contract for the purchase or sale of MBS at a future agreed-upon date for an established price
TDR: Troubled Debt Restructuring
TVA: Tennessee Valley Authority
UPB: Unpaid Principal Balance
VaR: Value at Risk
WAIR: Weighted-Average Interest Rate
4
Table of Contents


Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
 
Statements in this Form 10-K, including statements describing our objectives, projections, estimates or predictions, may be considered to be "forward-looking statements." These statements may use forward-looking terminology, such as "anticipates," "believes," "could," "estimates," "may," "should," "expects," "will," or their negatives or other variations on these terms. We caution that, by their nature, forward-looking statements involve risk or uncertainty and that actual results either could differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements or could affect the extent to which a particular objective, projection, estimate, or prediction is realized. These forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, the following:

economic and market conditions, including the timing and volume of market activity, inflation or deflation, changes in the value of global currencies, and changes in the financial condition of market participants;
volatility of market prices, interest rates, and indices or the availability of suitable interest rate indices, or other factors, resulting from the effects of, and changes in, various monetary or fiscal policies and regulations, including those determined by the FRBFederal Reserve and the FDIC, or a decline in liquidity in the financial markets, that could affect the value of investments, or collateral we hold as security for the obligations of our members and counterparties;
changes in demand for our advances and purchases of mortgage loans resulting from:
changes in our members' deposit flows and credit demands;
changes in products or services we are able to provide;
federal or state regulatory developments impacting suitability or eligibility of membership classes;
membership changes, including, but not limited to, mergers, acquisitions and consolidations of charters;
changes in the general level of housing activity in the United States and particularly our district states of Michigan and Indiana, the level of refinancing activity and consumer product preferences; and
competitive forces, including, without limitation, other sources of funding available to our members; and
changes in the terms and conditions of ownership of our capital stock;
changes in mortgage asset prepayment patterns, delinquency rates and housing values or improper or inadequate mortgage originations and mortgage servicing;
ability to introduce and successfully manage new products and services, including new types of collateral securing advances;
political events, including federal government shutdowns, administrative, legislative, regulatory, or other developments, national or international health crises (such as the coronavirus)COVID-19 pandemic) and the responses of governments and financial markets to such crises, changes in international political structures and alliances, and judicial rulings that affect us, our status as a secured creditor, our members (or certain classes of members), prospective members, counterparties, GSE's generally, one or more of the FHLBanks and/or investors in the consolidated obligations of the FHLBanks;
ability to access the capital markets and raise capital market funding on acceptable terms;
changes in our credit ratings or the credit ratings of the other FHLBanks and the FHLBank System;
changes in the level of government guarantees provided to other United States and international financial institutions;
dealer commitment to supporting the issuance of our consolidated obligations;
ability of one or more of the FHLBanks to repay its portion of the consolidated obligations, or otherwise meet its financial obligations;
ability to attract and retain skilled personnel;
ability to develop, implement and support technology and information systems sufficient to manage our business effectively;
nonperformance of counterparties to uncleared and cleared derivative transactions;
���changes in terms of derivative agreements and similar agreements;
loss arising from natural disasters, acts of war or acts of terrorism;
changes in or differing interpretations of accounting guidance; and
other risk factors identified in our filings with the SEC. 

Although we undertake no obligation to revise or update any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, additional disclosures may be made through reports filed with the SEC in the future, including our Forms 10-K, 10-Q and 8-K. This Form 10-K, including Business, Risk Factors and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and notes, which are included in Item 8.
5
Table of Contents


ITEM 1. BUSINESS

As used in this Form 10-K, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us," "our," and "Bank" refer to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis or its management. We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

Unless otherwise stated, amounts disclosed in this Item are rounded to the nearest million; therefore, dollar amounts of less than one million may not be reflected or, due to rounding, may not appear to agree to the amounts presented in thousands in the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements. Amounts used to calculate dollar and percentage changes are based on numbers in the thousands. Accordingly, calculations based upon the disclosed amounts (millions) may not produce the same results.

Background Information

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis is a regional wholesale bank that serves its member financial institutions in Michigan and Indiana. We are one of 11 regional FHLBanks across the United States, which, along with the Office of Finance, compose the FHLBank System established in 1932. Each FHLBank is a federal instrumentality of the United States of America that is privately capitalized and funded, receives no Congressional appropriations, and operates as an independent entity with its own board of directors, management, and employees.

Our mission is to provide reliable and readily available liquidity to our member institutions into support of housing finance and community investment. Our advance and mortgage purchase programs provide funding to assist members with asset/liability management, interest-rate risk management, mortgage pipelines, and other liquidity needs. In addition to funding, we provide various correspondent services, such as securities safekeeping and wire transfers. We also help to meet the economic and housing needs of communities and families through grants and low-cost advances that help support affordable housing and economic development initiatives.

We are wholly owned by our member institutions. All federally-insuredfederally insured depository institutions (including commercial banks, savings associations and credit unions), CDFIs certified by the CDFI Fund of the United States Treasury, certain non-federally insured credit unions, and non-captive insurance companies are eligible to become members of our Bank if they have a principal place of business, or are domiciled, in our district states of Michigan or Indiana. Applicants for membership must meet certainspecific requirements that demonstrate that they are engaged in residential housing finance.

All member institutions are required to purchase a minimum amount of our Class B capital stock as a condition of membership. Only members may own our capital stock, except for stock held by former members or their legal successors holding stock during their stock redemption period. Our capital stock is not publicly-traded;publicly traded; it is purchased by members from us and redeemed or repurchased by us at the stated par value. With our written approval, from us, a member may transfer any of its excess capital stock in our Bank to another member at par value. For additional information regarding our capital plan, see Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

As a financial cooperative, our members are also our primary customers. We are generally limited to making advances to and purchasing mortgage loans from members. We do not lend directly to or purchase mortgage loans directly from the general public.
TheOur principal funding source of our funding is the proceeds from the sale to the public of FHLBank debt instruments, known as consolidated obligations, which consist of CO bonds and discount notes. The Office of Finance was established as a joint office of the FHLBanks to facilitate the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations. The United States government does not guarantee, directly or indirectly, our consolidated obligations, which are the joint and several obligations of all FHLBanks.

6
Table of Contents


Each FHLBank was organized under the authority of the Bank Act as a GSE, i.e.,which is an entity that combines elements of private capital, public sponsorship, and public policy. The public sponsorship and public policy attributes of the FHLBanks include:

an exemption from federal, state, and local taxation, except employment and real estate taxes;
an exemption from registration under the Securities Act (although the FHLBanks are required by federal law to register a class of their equity securities under the Exchange Act);
the requirement that at least 40% of our directors be non-member "independent" directors; that two of these "independent" directors have more than four years of experience representing consumer or community interests in banking services, credit needs, housing, or consumer financial protections; and that the remaining "independent" directors have demonstrated knowledge or experience in auditing or accounting, derivatives, financial management, organizational management, project development or risk management practices, or other expertise established by Finance Agency regulations;
the United States Treasury's authority to purchase up to $4.0 billion of FHLBank consolidated obligations; and
the required allocation of 10% of annual net earnings before interest expense on MRCS to fund the AHP.

As an FHLBank, we seek to maintain a balance between our public policy mission and our goal of providing adequate returns on our members' capital.

The Finance Agency is the federal regulator of the FHLBanks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. The Finance Agency's stated mission is to ensure that the housing GSEs operate in a safe and sound manner so that they serve as a reliable source of liquidity and funding for housing finance and community investment. The Finance Agency's operating expenses with respect to the FHLBanks are funded by assessments on the FHLBanks. No tax dollars are used to support the operations of the Finance Agency relating to the FHLBanks.

Operating Segments

We manage our operations by grouping products and services within two operating segments. The segments identify the principal ways we provide services to our members. These segments reflect our two primary mission-asset activities and the manner in which they are managed from the perspective of development, resource allocation, product delivery, pricing, credit risk and operational administration.

These operating segments are (i) traditional, which consists of credit products, investments, and correspondent services and deposits; and (ii) mortgage loans, which consist substantially of mortgage loans purchased from our members through our MPP. The revenues, profit or loss, and total assets for each segment are disclosed in Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1615 - Segment Information.

Traditional.

Credit Products. We offer our members a wide variety of credit products, including advances, standby letters of credit, and lines of credit. We approve member credit requests based on our assessment of the member's creditworthiness and financial condition, as well as its collateral position. All credit products must be fully collateralized by a member's pledge of eligible assets.

Our primary credit product is advances. Members use advances for a wide variety of purposes including, but not limited to:

funding for single-family mortgages and multi-family mortgages held in portfolio, including both conforming and non-conforming mortgages (as determined in accordance with secondary market criteria);
temporary funding during the origination, packaging, and sale of mortgages into the secondary market;
funding for commercial real-estate loans and, especially with respect to CFIs, funding for small business, small farm, and small agri-business portfolio loans;
acquiring or holding MBS;
short-term liquidity;
asset/liability and interest-rate risk management;
a cost-effective alternative to holding short-term investments to meet contingent liquidity needs;
a competitively-priced alternative source of funds, especially with respect to smaller members with less-diverse funding sources; and
low-costat-cost funding to help support affordable housing and economic development initiatives.

7
Table of Contents


We offer standby letters of credit, typically for up to 10 years in term, which are rated Aaa by Moody's and AA+ by S&P. Letters of credit are performance contracts that guarantee the performance of a member to a third party and are subject to the same collateralization and borrowing limits that are applicable to advances. Letters of credit may be offered to assist members in facilitating residential housing finance, community lending, asset/liability management, or liquidity. We also offer a standby letter of credit product to collateralize public deposits.

We also offer lines of credit which allow members to fund short-term cash needs without submitting a new application for each funding request.

Advances. We offer a wide array of fixed-rate and adjustable-rate advances, on which interest is generally due monthly. The maturities of advances currently offered typically range from 1 day to 10 years, although the maximum maturity may be longer in some instances. Our primary advance products include:

Fixed-rate Bullet Advances, which have fixed rates throughout the term of the advances. These advances are typically referred to as "bullet" advances because no principal payment is due until maturity. Prepayments prior to maturity may be subject to prepayment fees. These advances can include a feature that allows for delayed settlement;
Putable Advances, which are fixed-rate advances that give us an option to terminate the advance prior to maturity. We would normally exercise the option to terminate the advance when interest rates increase. Upon our exercise of the option, the member must repay the putable advance, but replacement funding will be available to the member at current market rates;
Fixed-rate Amortizing Advances, which are fixed-rate advances that require principal payments either monthly, annually, or based on a specified amortization schedule and may have a balloon payment of remaining principal at maturity;
Adjustable-rate Advances, which are sometimes called "floaters," reprice periodically based on a variety of indices, including LIBOR, SOFR and the FHLBanks cost of funds index. In 2019, we began offering a SOFR-indexed adjustable-rate advance. LIBORWhile LIBOR-indexed floaters are the most common type of adjustable-rate advanceadvances we extend and have outstanding to our members, but after March 31, 2020 we will no longer offer new LIBOR-indexed adjustable-rate advances with maturities after December 31, 2021.advances. Prepayment terms are agreed to before the advance is extended. Most frequently, no prepayment fees are required if a member prepays an adjustable-rate advance on a reset date, after a pre-determined lock-out period, with the required notification. No principal payment is due prior to maturity;
Variable-rate Advances, which reprice daily. These advances may be extended on terms from one day to six months and may be prepaid on any given business day during that term without fee or penalty. No principal payment is due until maturity; and
Callable Advances, which are fixed-rate advances that give the member an option to prepay the advance before maturity on call dates with no prepayment fee, which members normally would exercise when interest rates decrease.

We also offer customized advances to meet the particular needs of our members. Our entire menu of advance products is generally available to each creditworthy member, regardless of the member's asset size. Finance Agency regulations require us to price our credit products consistently and without discrimination to any member applying for advances. We are also prohibited from pricing our advances below our marginal cost of matching term and maturity funds in the marketplace, including embedded options, and the administrative cost associated with extending such advances to members. Therefore, advances are typically priced at standard spreads above our cost of funds. Our board-approved credit policy allows us to offer lower rates on certain types of advances transactions. Determinations of such rates are based on factors such as volume, maturity, product type, funding availability and costs, and competitive factors in regard to other sources of funds.


8
Table of Contents


Advances Concentration. Credit risk can be magnified if a lender's portfolio is concentrated in a few borrowers. The following tables present the par value of advances outstanding to our largest borrowers ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020Advances Outstanding% of Total
Flagstar Bank, FSBFlagstar Bank, FSB$4,615 15 %
The Lincoln National Life Insurance CompanyThe Lincoln National Life Insurance Company3,130 10 %
Old National BankOld National Bank1,999 %
Jackson National Life Insurance CompanyJackson National Life Insurance Company1,931 %
American United Life Insurance CompanyAmerican United Life Insurance Company1,702 %
Subtotal - largest borrowersSubtotal - largest borrowers13,377 44 %
Next five largest borrowersNext five largest borrowers5,641 18 %
OthersOthers11,673 38 %
Total advances, par valueTotal advances, par value$30,691 100 %
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019Advances Outstanding% of TotalDecember 31, 2019Advances Outstanding% of Total
Flagstar Bank, FSB Flagstar Bank, FSB  $4,345  13 %Flagstar Bank, FSB$4,345 13 %
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company  3,580  11 %The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company3,580 11 %
Jackson National Life Insurance Company Jackson National Life Insurance Company  2,281  %Jackson National Life Insurance Company2,281 %
Old National Bank Old National Bank  1,801  %Old National Bank1,801 %
IAS Services LLC IAS Services LLC  1,650  %IAS Services LLC1,650 %
Subtotal - largest borrowersSubtotal - largest borrowers13,657  42 %Subtotal - largest borrowers13,657 42 %
Next five largest borrowersNext five largest borrowers5,967  18 %Next five largest borrowers5,967 18 %
OthersOthers12,648  40 %Others12,648 40 %
Total advances, par valueTotal advances, par value$32,272  100 %Total advances, par value$32,272 100 %
December 31, 2018Advances Outstanding% of Total
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company  $3,930  12 %
Flagstar Bank, FSB  3,143  10 %
Chemical Bank  2,445  %
Jackson National Life Insurance Company  2,016  %
American United Life Insurance Company  1,675  %
Subtotal - largest borrowers13,209  40 %
Next five largest borrowers6,854  21 %
Others12,766  39 %
Total advances, par value$32,829  100 %

Because of this concentration in advances, we perform frequent credit and collateral reviews on our largest borrowers. In addition, we regularly analyze the implications to our financial management and profitability if we were to lose the business of one or more of these borrowers.

At our discretion, and provided the borrower meets our contractual requirements, advances to borrowers that are no longer members may remain outstanding until maturity, subject to certain regulatory requirements.

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, we did not have gross interest income on advances, excluding the effects of interest-rate swaps, from any one borrower that exceeded 10% of our total interest income.

Collateral. All credit products extended to a member must be fully collateralized by the member's pledge of eligible assets. Each borrowing member and its affiliates that hold pledged collateral are required to grant us a security interest in such collateral. All such security interests held by us are afforded a priority by the Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 over the claims of any party, including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar party having rights as a lien creditor, except for claims held by bona fide purchasers for value or by parties that are secured by prior perfected security interests, provided that such claims would otherwise be entitled to priority under applicable law. Moreover, with respect to federally-insured depository institution members, our claims are given certain preferences pursuant to the receivership provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

With respect to insurance company members, however, Congress provided in the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 that state law generally governs the regulation of insurance and shall not be preempted by federal law unless the federal law expressly regulates the business of insurance. Thus, if a court were to determine that the priority status afforded the FHLBanks under Section 10(e) of the Bank Act conflicts with state insurance law applicable to our insurance company members, the court might then determine that the priority of our security interest would be governed by state law, not Section 10(e). Under these circumstances, the "super lien" priority protection afforded to our security interest under Section 10(e) may not fully apply when we lend to insurance company members. However, our security interests in collateral posted by insurance company members have express statutory protections in the jurisdictions where our members are domiciled. In addition, we monitor applicable states' laws, and take all necessary action to obtain and maintain a prior perfected security interest in the collateral, including by taking possession or control of the collateral when appropriate.


9
Table of Contents


Collateral Status Categories. We take collateral under a blanket, specific listings or possession status depending on the credit quality of the borrower, the type of institution, and our lien position on assets owned by the member (i.e., blanket, specific, or partially subordinated). The blanket status is the least restrictive and allows the member to retain possession of the pledged collateral, provided that the member executes a written security agreement and agrees to hold the collateral for our benefit. Under the specific listings status, the member maintains possession of the specific collateral pledged, but the member generally provides listings of loans pledged with detailed loan information such as loan amount, payments, maturity date, interest rate, LTV, collateral type, FICO® scores, etc. Members under possession status are required to place the collateral in possession with our Bank or aan approved third-party custodian in amounts sufficient to secure all outstanding obligations.

Eligible Collateral. Eligible collateral types include certain investment securities, one-to-four family first mortgage loans, multi-family first mortgage loans, deposits in our Bank, certain ORERC assets (such as commercial MBS, municipal securities, commercial real estate loans and home equity loans), and small business loans or farm real estate loans from CFIs. While we only extend credit based on the borrowing capacity for such approved collateral, our contractual arrangements typically allow us to take other assets as collateral to provide additional protection. In addition, under the Bank Act, we have a lien on the borrower's stock in our Bank as security for all of the borrower's indebtedness.

We have an Anti-Predatory Lending Policy and a Subprime and Nontraditional Residential Mortgage Policy that establish guidelines for any subprime or nontraditional loans included in the collateral pledged to us. Loans that are delinquent or violate those policies do not qualify as acceptable collateral and are required to be removed from any collateral value calculation. Consistent with the CFPB home mortgage lending rules, we accept loans that comply with or are exempt from the ability-to-pay requirements as collateral.

In order to help mitigate the market, credit, liquidity, operational and business risk associated with collateral, we apply an over-collateralization requirement to the book value or market value of pledged collateral to establish its lending value. Collateral that we have determined to contain a low level of risk, such as United States government obligations, is over-collateralized at a lower rate than collateral that carries a higher level of risk, such as small business loans.loans. Standard requirements range from 100% for deposits (cash) to 140% - 155% for residential mortgages pledged through blanket status. Over-collateralization requirements for eligible securities range from 103% to 190%; less traditional types of collateral have standard over-collateralization ratios up to 360%.

The over-collateralization requirement applied to asset classes may also vary depending on collateral status, because lower requirements are applied as our levels of information and control over the assets increase. Over-collateralization requirements are applied using market values for collateral in listing and possession status and book value for collateral pledged through blanket status. In no event, however, would market values assigned to whole loan collateral exceed par value. For more information, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Advances and Other Credit Products.    

Collateral Review and Monitoring. We verify collateral balances by performing periodic, on-site collateral audits on our borrowers, which allows us to verify loan pledge eligibility, credit strength and documentation quality, as well as adherence to our Anti-Predatory Lending Policy, our Subprime and Nontraditional Residential Mortgage Policy, and other collateral policies. In addition, on-site collateral audit findings are used to adjust over-collateralization amounts to mitigate credit risk and collateral liquidity concerns.

Investments. We maintain a portfolio of investments, purchased from approved counterparties, members and their affiliates, or other FHLBanks, to provide liquidity, utilize balance sheet capacity and supplement our earnings. Higher earnings bolster our ability to support affordable housing and community investment. Our investment portfolio may only include investments deemed investment quality at the time of purchase.

Our short-term investments are placed with large, high-quality financial institutions with investment-grade long-term credit ratings, and ensure the availability of funds to meet our members' credit needs. Such investments typically include interest-bearing demand deposit accounts, unsecured federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell, which are secured by United States Treasuries or Agency MBS passthroughs, unsecured federal funds sold and interest-bearing demand deposit accounts.Treasuries. Each may be purchased with either overnight or term maturities, or in the case of demand deposit accounts, redeemed at any time during business hours. In the aggregate, the FHLBanks may represent a significant percentage of the federal funds sold market at any one time, although each FHLBank manages its investment portfolio separately.

Our liquidity portfolio also includes investments in U.S. Treasury securities.

10
Table of Contents


The longer-term investments typically generate higher returns and consist of (i) securities issued by the United States government, its agencies, and certain GSEs, and (ii) Agency MBS.

All unsecured investments are subject to certain selection criteria. Each unsecured counterparty must be approved and has an exposure limit, which is computed in the same manner regardless of the counterparty's status as a member, affiliate of a member or unrelated party. These criteria determine the permissible amount and maximum term of the investment. For more information, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Investments.

Under Finance Agency regulations, except for certain investments authorized under state trust law for our retirement plans, we are prohibited from investing in the following types of securities:

instruments, such as common stock, that represent an equity ownership in an entity, other than stock in small business investment companies, or certain investments targeted to low-income persons or communities;
instruments issued by non-United States entities, other than those issued by United States branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks;
non-investment grade debt instruments, other than certain investments targeted to low-income persons or communities and instruments that were downgraded after their purchase;
whole mortgages or other whole loans, except for:
those acquired under the MPP or the MPF Program;
certain investments targeted to low-income persons or communities; and
certain foreign housing loans authorized under Section 12(b) of the Bank Act; and
non-United States dollar denominated securities.

In addition, we are prohibited by a Finance Agency regulation and Advisory Bulletin, as well as internal policy, from purchasing certain types of investments, such as interest-only or principal-only stripped MBS, CMOs, REMICs or ABS; residual-interest or interest-accrual classes of CMOs, REMICs, ABS and MBS; and CMOs or REMICs with underlying collateral containing pay option/negative amortization mortgage loans, unless those loans or securities are guaranteed by the United States government, Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or Ginnie Mae.

Finance Agency regulation further provides that the total book value of our investments in MBS and ABS must not exceed 300% of our total regulatory capital, consisting of Class B stock, Class A stock, if any, retained earnings, and MRCS, as of the day we purchase the investments, based on the capital amount most recently reported to the Finance Agency. If the outstanding balances of our investments in MBS and ABS exceed the limitation at any time, but were in compliance at the time we purchased the investments, we would not be considered out of compliance with the regulation, but we would not be permitted to purchase additional investments in MBS or ABS until these outstanding balances were within the capital limitation. Generally, our goal is to maintain these investments near the 300% limit.

Deposit Products. Deposit products provide a small portion of our funding resources, while also giving members a high-quality asset that satisfies their regulatory liquidity requirements. We offer several types of deposit products to our members and other institutions including overnight and demand deposits. We may accept uninsured deposits from:

our members;
institutions eligible to become members;
any institution for which we are providing correspondent services;
interest-rate swap counterparties;
other FHLBanks; or
other federal government instrumentalities.

Mortgage Loans. Mortgage loans held for portfolio consist substantially of residential mortgage loans purchased from our members through our MPP and participatingMPP. Participating interests were purchased in 2012-2014 from the FHLBank of Topeka in residential mortgage loans that were originated by certain of its members under the MPF Program. These programs help fulfill the FHLBank System's housing mission and provide an additional source of liquidity to FHLBank members that choose to sell mortgage loans into the secondary market rather than holding them in their own portfolios. These programs are considered AMA, a core mission activity of the FHLBanks, as defined by Finance Agency regulations.

11
Table of Contents


Mortgage Purchase Program.

Overview. We purchase mortgage loans directly from our members through our MPP. Members that participate in the MPP are known as PFIs. By regulation, we are not permitted to purchase loans directly from any institution that is not a member or Housing Associate of the FHLBank System, and we may not use a trust or other entity to purchase the loans. We purchase conforming, medium- or long-term, fixed-rate, fully amortizing, level payment loans predominantly for primary, owner-occupied, detached residences, including single-family properties, and two-, three-, and four-unit properties. Additionally, to a lesser degree, we purchase loans for primary, owner-occupied, attached residences (including condominiums and planned unit developments), and second/vacation homes.

Our mortgage loan purchases are governed by the Finance Agency's AMA regulation. Further, while the regulation does not expressly limit us to purchasing fixed-rate loans, before purchasing adjustable-rate loans we would need to analyze whether such purchases would require Finance Agency approval under its New Business Activity regulation. Such regulation provides that any material change to an FHLBank's business activity that results in new risks or operations needs to be pre-approved by the Finance Agency.

Under Finance Agency regulations, all pools of mortgage loans currently purchased by us, other than government-insured mortgage loans, must have sufficient credit enhancement to be rated by us as at least investment grade, and we operate our credit enhancement model and methodology accordingly to estimate the amount of necessary credit enhancement for those pools.

As a result of the credit enhancements, the PFI shares the credit risk with us on conventional mortgage loans. We manage the interest-rate risk, prepayment option risk, and liquidity risk.

Mortgage Standards. All loans we purchase must meet the guidelines for our MPP or be specifically approved as an exception based on compensating factors. Our guidelines generally meet or exceed the underwriting standards of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. For example, the maximum LTV ratio for any conventional mortgage loan at the time of purchase is 95%, and borrowers must meet certain minimum credit scores depending upon the type of property or loan. In addition, we will not knowingly purchase any loan that violates the terms of our Anti-Predatory Lending Policy or our Subprime and Nontraditional Residential Mortgage Policy. Furthermore, we require our members to warrant to us that all of the loans sold to us are in compliance with all applicable laws, including prohibitions on anti-predatory lending. All loans purchased through our MPP must qualify as "Safe-Harbor Qualified Mortgages" under CFPB rules.

Under our guidelines, a PFI must:

be an active originator of conventional mortgages and have servicing capabilities, if applicable, or use a servicer that we approve;
advise us if it has been the subject of any adverse action by either Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac; and
along with its parent company, if applicable, meet the capital requirements of each state and federal regulatory agency with jurisdiction over the member's or parent company's activities.

Mortgage Loan Concentration. During 2019,2020, our top-selling PFI sold us mortgage loans totaling $255 $138 million, or 20%7% of thethe total mortgage loans purchased by the Bank in 2019.2020. Our five top-selling PFIs soldsold us 45%27%. Because of this concentration, we regularly analyze the implications to our financial management and profitability if we were to lose thethe business of one or more of these sellers.

For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017,2018, no aggregate mortgage loans outstanding previously purchased from any one PFI contributed interest income that exceeded 10% of our total interest income.

The properties underlying the mortgage loans in our MPP portfolio are dispersed across 50 states, the District of Columbia and the Virgin Islands, with concentrations in Michigan and Indiana, the two states in our district.

The median original size of each mortgage loan outstanding was approximately $167approximately $157 thousand at December 31, 2019. 2020.

12
Table of Contents


Credit Enhancement. FHA mortgage loans are backed by insurance provided by the United States government and, therefore, no additional credit enhancements (such as an LRA or SMI) are required.

For conventional mortgage loans, the credit enhancement required to reach the minimum credit rating is determined by using a credit risk model. The model is used to evaluate each MCC or pool of MCCs to ensure the LRA percentage as credit enhancement is sufficient. The model evaluates the characteristics of the loans the PFIs actually delivered for the likelihood of timely payment of principal and interest. The model's results are based on numerous standard borrower and loan attributes, such as the LTV ratio loan purpose (suchand borrower's credit score, as purchase of home, refinance, or cash-out refinance), type of documentation, incomewell as housing market factors, such as the Home Price Index and debt expense ratios and credit scores.zip code. Based on the credit assessment, we are required to hold risk-based capital to help mitigate the potential credit risk in accordance with the Finance Agency regulations.

Our original MPP, which we ceased offering for conventional loans in 2010, relied on credit enhancement from LRA and SMI to achieve an implied credit rating of at least AA based on ana NRSRO model in compliance with Finance Agency regulations. In 2010, we began offering Advantage MPP for new conventional MPP loans, which utilizes an enhanced fixed LRA for additional credit enhancement, resulting in an implied credit rating of at least investment grade, consistent with Finance Agency regulations, instead of utilizing coverage from an SMI provider. The only substantive difference between the two programs is the credit enhancement structure. For both the original MPP and Advantage MPP, the funds in the LRA are established in an amount sufficient to cover expected losses in excess of the borrower's equity and PMI, if any, and used to pay losses on a pool basis.

Credit losses on defaulted mortgage loans in a pool are paid from these sources, until they are exhausted, in the following order:

borrower's equity;
PMI, if applicable;
LRA;
SMI, if applicable; and
our Bank.

LRA. We use either a "spread LRA" or a "fixed LRA" for credit enhancement. The spread LRA is used in combination with SMI for credit enhancement of conventional mortgage loans purchased under our original MPP, and the fixed LRA is used for all acquisitions of conventional mortgage loans under Advantage MPP.

Original MPP. The spread LRA is funded through a reduction to the net yield earned on the loans, and the corresponding purchase price paid to the PFI reflects our reduced net yield. The LRA for each pool of loans is funded monthly at an annual rate ranging from 6 to 20 bps, depending on the terms of the MCC, and is used to pay loan loss claims or is held until the LRA accumulates to a required "release point." The release point is 20 to 85 bps of the then outstanding principal balances of the loans in that pool, depending on the terms of the original contract. If the LRA exceeds the required release point, the excess amount is eligible for return to the PFI(s) that sold us the loans in that pool, generally subject to a minimum five-year lock-out period after the pool is closed to acquisitions.

Advantage MPP. The LRA for Advantage MPP differs from our original MPP in that the funding of the fixed LRA occurs at the time we acquire the loan and is based on the principal amount purchased. Depending on the terms of the MCC, the LRA funding amount varies between 110 bps and 120 bps of the principal amount. LRA funds not used to pay loan losses may be returned to the PFI subject to a retention schedule detailed in each MCC based on the original LRA amount. Per the retention schedule, no LRA funds are returned to the PFI for the first five years after the pool is closed to acquisitions. We absorb any losses in excess of available LRA funds.


13
Table of Contents


SMI. For pools of loans acquired under our original MPP, we have credit protection from loss on each loan, where eligible, through SMI, which provides insurance to cover credit losses to approximately 50% of the property's original value, depending on the SMI contract terms, and subject, in certain cases, to an aggregate stop-loss provision in the SMI policy. Some MCCs that equal or exceed $35 million of total initial principal to be sold on a "best-efforts" basis include an aggregate loss/benefit limit or "stop-loss" that is equal to the total initial principal balance of loans under the MCC multiplied by the stop-loss percentage (ranges from 200 - 400 bps), as is then in effect, and represents the maximum aggregate amount payable by the SMI provider under the SMI policy for that pool. Even with the stop-loss provision, the aggregate of the LRA and the amount payable by the SMI provider under an SMI stop-loss contract will be equal to or greater than the amount of credit enhancement required for the pool to have an implied NRSRO credit rating of at least AA at the time of purchase. Non-credit losses, such as uninsured property damage losses that are not covered by the SMI, can be recovered from the LRA to the extent that there are releasable LRA funds available. We absorb any non-credit losses greater than the available LRA. We do not have SMI coverage on loans purchased under Advantage MPP.

Pool Aggregation. We offer pool aggregation under our MPP. Our pool aggregation program is designed to reduce the credit enhancement costs to small and mid-size PFIs. Under pool aggregation, a PFI's loans are pooled with similar loans originated by other PFIs to create aggregate pools of approximately $100 million original UPB or greater. The combination of small and mid-size PFIs' loans into one pool also assists in the evaluation of the amount of LRA needed for the overall credit enhancement.

Conventional Loan Pricing. We consider the cost of the credit enhancement (LRA and SMI, if applicable) when we formulate conventional loan pricing. Each of these credit enhancement structures is accounted for, not only in our expected return on acquired mortgage loans, but also in the risk review performed during the accumulation/pooling process.

We typically receive a 0.25% fee on cash-out refinancing transactions with LTVs between 75% and 80%. Our current guidelines do not allow cash-out refinance loans above 80% LTV. We also adjust the market price we pay for loans depending upon market conditions. We continue to evaluate the scope and rate of such fees as they evolve in the industry. We do not pay a PFI any fees other than the servicing fee when the PFI retains the servicing rights.

Servicing. We do not service the mortgage loans we purchase. PFIs may elect to retain servicing rights for the loans sold to us, or they may elect to sell servicing rights to an MPP-approved servicer.

Those PFIs that retain servicing rights receive a monthly servicing fee and may be required to undergo a review by a third-party quality control contractor that advises the PFIs of any deficiencies in servicing procedures or processes and then notifies us so that we can monitor the PFIs' performance. The PFIs that retain servicing rights can sell those rights at a later date with our approval. If we deem servicing to be inadequate, we can require that the servicing of those loans be transferred to a servicer that is acceptable to us.

The servicers are responsible for all aspects of servicing, including, among other responsibilities, the administration of any foreclosure and claims processes from the date we purchase the loan until the loan has been fully satisfied. Our MPP was designed to require loan servicers to foreclose and liquidate in the servicer's name rather than in our name. As the servicer progresses through the process from foreclosure to liquidation, we are paid in full for all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the loan through the normal remittance process.

It is the servicer's responsibility to initiate claims for losses on the loans. If a loss is expected, no claims are settled until the claim has been reviewed and approved by the Bank. For loans that are credit-enhanced with SMI, if it is determined that a loss is covered, the SMI provider pays the claim in full and seeks reimbursement from the LRA funds. The SMI provider is entitled to reimbursement for credit losses from funds available in the LRA that are equal to the aggregate amounts contributed to the LRA less any amounts paid for previous claims and any amounts that have been released to the PFI from the LRA or paid to us to cover prior claims. If the LRA has been depleted but is still being funded, based on our contractual arrangement, we and/or the SMI provider are entitled to reimbursement from those funds as they are received, up to the full reimbursable amount of the claim. These claim payments would be reflected as additional deductions from the LRA as they were paid. For more information, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio - MPP.

14
Table of Contents


Housing Goals. The Bank Act requires the Finance Agency to establish low-income housing goals for mortgage purchases. Under its current housing goals regulation, theThe Finance Agency may establish low-income housingissued a final FHLBank Housing Goals rule in 2020. The rule establishes two goals for FHLBanksany FHLBank that acquire,acquires mortgages in any calendar year, more than $2.5 billion of conventional mortgages through an AMA program.program during a year: (i) a prospective target of 20% of the number of an FHLBank’s total AMA mortgage purchases for its purchases of mortgage loans to very low-income families, low-income families, or families in low-income areas; and (ii) a separate small-member participation housing goal with a target level of 50% of an FHLBank’s total AMA users. The rule provides that an FHLBank may request Finance Agency approval of alternative target levels for either or both of these goals. If we exceed this volume threshold and fail to meet any affordable housingone or both goals, established by the Finance Agency that were determined by the Director to have been feasible, we may be required to submit a housing plan to the Finance Agency. The rule took effect August 24, 2020, and enforcement will phase in through December 31, 2023. During the phase-in period, the Finance Agency will monitor and report our housing goals performance, but will not impose a housing plan remedy if the Bank fails to meet either or both of the housing goal target levels.

Funding Sources

The primary source of funds for each of the FHLBanks is the sale of consolidated obligations, which consist of CO bonds and discount notes. The Finance Agency and the United States Secretary of the Treasury oversee the issuance of this debt in the capital markets. Finance Agency regulations govern the issuance of debt on our behalf and authorize us to issue consolidated obligations through the Office of Finance, under Section 11(a) of the Bank Act. No FHLBank is permitted to issue individual debt without the approval of the Finance Agency.

While the primary liability for consolidated obligations issued to provide funds for a particular FHLBank rests with that FHLBank, consolidated obligations are the joint and several obligations of all of the FHLBanks under Section 11(a). Although each FHLBank is a GSE, consolidated obligations are not obligations of, and are not guaranteed by, the United States government. Consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of all of thethe FHLBanks and are rated Aaa by Moody's and AA+ by S&P.

Consolidated Obligation Bonds. CO bonds satisfy term funding requirements and are issued with a variety of maturities and terms under various programs. The maturities of these securities may range from 4 months to 30 years, but the maturities are not subject to any statutory or regulatory limit. CO bonds can be fixed or adjustable rate and callable or non-callable. Those issued with adjustable-rate payment terms use a variety of indices for interest rate resets, including LIBOR, Federal Funds,EFFR, United States Treasury Bill, Constant Maturity Swap, Prime Rate, SOFR, and others. CO bonds are issued and distributed through negotiated or competitively bid transactions with approved underwriters or selling group members.

Consolidated Obligation Discount Notes. We also issue discount notes to provide short-term funds. These securities can have maturities that range from one day to one year, and are offered daily through a discount note selling group and other authorized securities dealers. Discount notes are generally sold below their face values and are redeemed at par when they mature.

Office of Finance. The issuance of consolidated obligations is facilitated and executed by the Office of Finance, which also services all outstanding debt, provides information on capital market developments to the FHLBanks, and manages our relationship with the NRSROs with respect to consolidated obligations. The Office of Finance also prepares and publishes the FHLBanks' combined quarterly and annual financial reports.

As the FHLBanks' fiscal agent for debt issuance, the Office of Finance can control the timing and amount of each issuance. Through its oversight of the United States financial markets, the United States Treasury can also affect debt issuance for the FHLBanks. For more information, see Item 1. Business - Supervision and Regulation - Government Corporations Control Act.

15
Table of Contents


Affordable Housing Programs, Community Investment and Small Business Grants

Each FHLBank is required to set aside 10% of its annual net earnings before interest expense on MRCS to fund its AHP, subject to an annual FHLBank System-wide minimum of $100 million. Through our AHP, we may provide cash grants or interest subsidies on advances to our members, which are, in turn, provided to awarded projects or qualified individuals to finance the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of very low- to moderate-income owner-occupied or rental housing. Our AHP includes the following:

Competitive Program, which is the primary grant program to finance the purchase, construction or rehabilitation of housing for individuals with incomes at or below 80% of the median income for the area, and to finance the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of rental housing, with at least 20% of the units occupied by, and affordable for, very low-income households. Each year, 65% of our annual available AHP funds are granted through this program. AHP-related advances, of which none were outstanding at December 31, 20192020 or 2018,2019, are also part of this program.


15
Table of Contents


Set-Aside Programs, which include 35% of our annual available AHP funds, are administered through the following:

Homeownership Opportunities Program, which provides assistance with down payments and closing costs to first-time homebuyers;
Neighborhood Impact Program, which provides rehabilitation assistance to homeowners to help improve neighborhoods;
Accessibility Modifications Program, which provides funding for accessibility modifications and minor home rehabilitation for eligible senior homeowners or owner-occupied households with one or more individuals having a permanent disability; and
Disaster Relief Program, which may be activated at our discretion in cases of federal or state disaster declarations for rehabilitation or down payment assistance targeted to low- or moderate-income homeowner disaster victims. The disaster relief program was most recently approved by the board of directors and activated to assist victims of the 2018homeowners impacted by significant flooding disaster/emergency declaration in certainseveral Michigan and Indiana counties.

In addition, we offer a variety of specialized advance programs to support housing and community development needs. Through our Community Investment Program ("CIP"), we offer advances to our members involved in community economic development activities benefiting low- or moderate-income families or neighborhoods. These funds can be used for the development of housing, infrastructure improvements, or assistance to small businesses or businesses that are creating or retaining jobs in the member's community for low- and moderate-income families. These advances typically have maturities ranging from overnight to 20 years and are priced at our cost of funds plus reasonable administrative expenses. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, we had $831$753 million and $796$831 million, respectively, of outstanding principal on CIP-related advances.

In 2018, the Bank began offering small business grants under its new Elevate program, which are designed to support the growth and development of small businesses in Michigan and Indiana by providing funding for capital expenditures, workforce training, or other business-related needs. The total amountamounts awarded in 2020, 2019 and 2018 waswere $503,171, $391,751 and $255,595, respectively.

Community Mentors is a community engagement and economic development leadership program which includes a workshop and accompanying implementation grant. In 2020, the Bank began offering a $10 thousand grant to one Indiana and one Michigan community participating in the Community Mentors program.

16
Table of Contents


Use of Derivatives

Derivatives are an integral part of our financial management strategies to manage identified risks inherent in our lending, investing and funding activities and to achieve our risk management objectives. Finance Agency regulations and our Enterprise Risk Management Policyrisk management policies establish guidelines for the use of derivatives. Permissible derivatives include interest-rate swaps, swaptions, interest-rate cap and floor agreements, calls, puts, futures, and forward contracts. We are only permitted to execute derivative transactions to manage interest-rate risk exposure inherent in otherwise unhedged asset or liability positions, hedge embedded options in assets and liabilities including mortgage prepayment risk positions, hedge any foreign currency positions, and act as an intermediary between our members and interest-rate swap counterparties. We are prohibited from trading in or the speculative use of these instruments.

Our use of derivatives is the primary way we align the preferences of investors for the types of debt securities they want to purchase and the preferences of member institutions for the types of advances they want to hold and the types of mortgage loans they want to sell. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities and Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk - Use of Derivative Hedges.

Supervision and Regulation

Our business is subject to extensive regulation and supervision. The laws and regulations to which we are subject cover all key aspects of our business, and directly and indirectly affect our product and service offerings, pricing, competitive position, strategic plan, relationship with members and third parties, capital structure, cash needs and uses, and information security. As discussed throughout this Form 10-K, such regulations can have a significant effect on key drivers of our results of operations.

The Bank Act. We are supervised and regulated by the Finance Agency, an independent agency in the executive branch of the United States government, established by HERA.

Under the Bank Act, the Finance Agency's responsibility is to ensure that, pursuant to regulations promulgated by the Finance Agency, each FHLBank:

carries out its housing finance mission;
remains adequately capitalized and able to raise funds in the capital markets; and
operates in a safe and sound manner.

16
Table of Contents


The Finance Agency is headed by a Director, who is appointed to a five-year term by the President of the United States, with the advice and consent of the Senate. The Director appoints a Deputy Director for the Division of Enterprise Regulation, a Deputy Director for the Division of FHLBank Regulation, and a Deputy Director for Housing Mission and Goals, who oversees the housing mission and goals of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, as well as the housing finance and community and economic development mission of the FHLBanks. HERA also established the Federal Housing Finance Oversight Board, comprised of the Secretaries of the Treasury and HUD, the Chair of the SEC, and the Finance Agency Director. The Federal Housing Finance Oversight Board functions as an advisory body to the Finance Agency Director. The Finance Agency's operating expenses are funded by assessments on the FHLBanks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. As such, no tax dollars or other appropriations support the operations of the Finance Agency or the FHLBanks. In addition to reviewing our submissions of monthly and quarterly information on our financial condition and results of operations, the Finance Agency conducts annual on-site examinations and performs periodic on- and off-site reviews in order to assess our safety and soundness.

The United States Treasury receives a copy of the Finance Agency's annual report to Congress, monthly reports reflecting the FHLBank System's securities transactions, and other reports reflecting the FHLBank System's operations. Our annual financial statements are audited by an independent registered public accounting firm in accordance with standards issued by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, as well as the government auditing standards issued by the United States Comptroller General. The Comptroller General has authority under the Bank Act to audit or examine the Finance Agency and the FHLBank System and to decide the extent to which they fairly and effectively fulfill the purposes of the Bank Act. The Finance Agency's Office of Inspector General also has investigation authority over the Finance Agency and the FHLBank System.

GLB Act Amendments to the Bank Act. The GLB Act amended the Bank Act to require that each FHLBank maintain a capital structure comprised of Class A stock, Class B stock, or both. A member can redeem Class A stock upon six months' prior written notice to its FHLBank. A member can redeem Class B stock upon five years' prior written notice to its FHLBank. Class B stock has a higher weighting than Class A stock for purposes of calculating the minimum leverage requirement applicable to each FHLBank.

17
Table of Contents


The Bank Act requires that each FHLBank maintain permanent capital and total capital in sufficient amounts to comply with specified, minimum risk-based capital and leverage capital requirements. From time to time, for reasons of safety and soundness, the Finance Agency may require one or more individual FHLBanks to maintain more permanent capital or total capital than is required by the regulations. Failure to comply with these requirements or the minimum capital requirements could result in the imposition of operating agreements, cease and desist orders, civil money penalties, and other regulatory action, including involuntary merger, liquidation, or reorganization as authorized by the Bank Act.

HERA Amendments to the Bank Act. In addition to establishing the Finance Agency, HERA eliminated regulatory authority to appoint directors to our board. HERA also eliminated regulatory authority to cap director fees (subject to the Finance Agency's review of reasonableness of such compensation), but placed additional controls over executive compensation.

Government Corporations Control Act. We are subject to the Government Corporations Control Act, which provides that, before we can issue and offer consolidated obligations to the public, the Secretary of the United States Treasury must prescribe the form, denomination, maturity, interest rate, and conditions of the obligations; the way and time issued; and the selling price.

Furthermore, this Act provides that the United States Comptroller General may review any audit of the financial statements of an FHLBank conducted by an independent registered public accounting firm. If the Comptroller General undertakes such a review, the results and any recommendations must be reported to Congress, the Office of Management and Budget, and the FHLBank in question. The Comptroller General may also conduct a separate audit of any of our financial statements.

Federal Securities Laws. Our shares of Class B stock are registered with the SEC under the Exchange Act, and we are generally subject to the information, disclosure, insider trading restrictions, and other requirements under the Exchange Act, with certain exceptions. Our amended capital plan authorizes us to also issue Class A stock, but we have not issued any such stock. We are not subject to the registration provisions of the Securities Act. We have been, and continue to be, subject to all relevant liability provisions of the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

Federal and State Banking Laws. We are generally not subject to the state and federal banking laws affecting United States retail depository financial institutions. However, the Bank Act requires the FHLBanks to submit reports to the Finance Agency concerning transactions involving loans and other financial instruments that involve fraud or possible fraud. In addition, we are required to maintain an anti-money laundering program, under which we are required to report suspicious transactions to the Financial Crimes Enforcement Network pursuant to the Bank Secrecy Act and the USA Patriot Act.


17
Table of Contents


We contract with third-party compliance firms to perform certain services on our behalf to assist us with our compliance with these regulations as they are applicable to us. Finance Agency regulations require that we monitor and assess our third-party firms' performance of the services. As we identify deficiencies in our third-party firms' performance, we seek to remediate the deficiencies. Under certain circumstances, we are required to notify the Finance Agency about the deficiencies and our response to assure our compliance with these regulations.

As a wholesale secured lender and a secondary market purchaser of mortgage loans, we are not, in general, directly subject to the various federal and state laws regarding consumer credit protection, such as anti-predatory lending laws. However, as non-compliance with these laws could affect the value of these loans as collateral or acquired assets, we require our members to warrant that all of the loans pledged or sold to us are in compliance with all applicable laws. Federal law requires that, when a mortgage loan (defined to include any consumer credit transaction secured by the principal dwelling of the consumer) is sold or transferred, the new creditor shall, within 30 days of the sale or transfer, notify the borrower of the following: the identity, address and telephone number of the new creditor; the date of transfer; how to contact an agent or party with the authority to act on behalf of the new creditor; the location of the place where the transfer is recorded; and any other relevant information regarding the new creditor. In accordance with this statute, we provide the appropriate notice to borrowers whose mortgage loans we purchase under our MPP and have established procedures to ensure compliance with this notice requirement. In the case of the participating interests in mortgage loans we purchased from the FHLBank of Topeka under the MPF Program, the FHLBank of Chicago (as the MPF Provider) issued the appropriate notice to the affected borrowers and established its own procedures to ensure compliance with the notice requirement.

Regulatory Enforcement Actions. While examination reports are confidential between the Finance Agency and an FHLBank, the Finance Agency may publicly disclose supervisory actions or agreements that the Finance Agency has entered into with an FHLBank. We are not subject to any such Finance Agency actions, and we are not aware of any current Finance Agency actions with respect to other FHLBanks that could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.

18
Table of Contents


Membership

Our membership territory is comprised of the states of Michigan and Indiana. In 2019, 12020, 3 new member wasmembers were added and 717 members were merged or consolidated, for a net reduction of 614 members.

The following table presents the composition of our members by type of financial institution.
Type of InstitutionDecember 31, 2019% of TotalDecember 31, 2018% of Total
Commercial banks and savings associations187  50 %192  51 %
Credit unions129  35 %129  34 %
Insurance companies53  14 %53  14 %
CDFIs % %
Total member institutions373  100 %379  100 %

Type of InstitutionDecember 31, 2020% of TotalDecember 31, 2019% of Total
Commercial banks and savings associations176 49 %187 50 %
Credit unions129 36 %129 35 %
Insurance companies50 14 %53 14 %
CDFIs%%
Total member institutions359 100 %373 100 %

In light of the requirement under the Final Membership Rule for the memberships of captive insurance companies to be terminated no later than February 19, 2021, the membership of one captive insurer was terminated in 2020 and all of its advances outstanding were repaid. In addition, another captive insurer whose membership was also required to be terminated by February 19, 2021 repaid a significant amount of outstanding advances during 2020.

There was no materialother significant impact on our business as a result of the changereduction in membership composition.membership.

Competition

We operate in a highly competitive environment. Demand for advances is affected by, among other factors, the cost and availability of other sources of liquidity for our members, including customer deposits, brokered deposits, reciprocal deposits and public funds. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured. Such other suppliers may include the United States government, the Federal Reserve Banks, corporate credit unions, the Central Liquidity Facility, investment banks, commercial banks, and in certain circumstances other FHLBanks. Large institutions may also have independent access to the national and global credit markets. Also, the availability of alternative funding sources to members, such as growth in deposits from members' banking customers, can significantly influence the demand for advances and can vary as a result of several factors, including legislative or regulatory changes, market conditions, members' creditworthiness, and availability of collateral.

Likewise, our MPP is subject to significant competition. Direct competition for purchases of mortgages comes from other buyers of conventional, conforming, fixed-rate mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In addition, PFIs face increased origination competition from originators that are not members of our Bank.


18
Table of Contents


We also compete with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities for funds raised through the issuance of CO bonds and discount notes. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs to us or lesser amounts of debt issued at the same cost than otherwise would be the case.

19
EmployeesTable of Contents


Human Capital Resources

The Bank’s human capital is a significant contributor to the successful achievement of the Bank’s strategic business objectives. In managing the Bank’s human capital, the Bank focuses on its workforce profile and the various associated programs and philosophies.

Workforce Profile.

The Bank’s workforce is substantially comprised of corporate office-based employees, with the Bank’s principal operations in one location. As of December 31, 2020, the Bank had 259 full-time and 3 part-time employees, of which 61% were male and 39% were female, while 77% were non-minority and 23% were minority.

The Bank’s workforce historically has included a large number of longer-tenured employees. The Bank strives to both develop talent from within the organization and supplement talent with external hires. The Bank believes that developing talent internally results in institutional strength and continuity and promotes loyalty and commitment in the Bank’s employee base, which furthers its success, while adding new employees contributes to new ideas, continuous improvement, and the Bank’s goals of a diverse and inclusive workforce. As of December 31, 2019, we had2020, the average tenure of the Bank’s employees was 2538.6 full-timeyears. There are no collective bargaining agreements with the Bank’s employees.

Total Rewards.

The Bank seeks to attract, develop and retain talented employees to achieve its strategic business objectives, enhance business performance and provide a reasonable risk-return balance for our cooperative members, both as users of our products and as shareholders, tailored to our status and risk appetite as a housing GSE. The Bank recognizes and rewards performance through a combination of total rewards and development opportunities, including the following:

Cash compensation
Competitive salary; and
Incentive opportunities;
Benefits and perquisites
Medical, dental, and vision insurance;
Wellness incentive credit opportunities to reduce the net cost of medical insurance to qualifying participants;
Life, long-term disability, and other insurance coverages;
401(k) retirement savings plans for which the Bank matches certain contributions; and
Pension benefits for employees hired before February 1, 2010;
Wellness programs
Employee assistance program;
Health coaching;
Interactive education sessions; and
An online portal to inspire fitness and health goals;
Employee engagement
Employee resource groups; and
Cultural and inclusion initiatives;
Work/Life balance
100% paid salary continuation for short-term disability, parental and military leave, bereavement, jury duty, and certain court appearances; and
Remote working options;
Time away from work
Vacation, illness, personal, holiday, and certain volunteer opportunities;
Development
Training focused on leadership development, employee engagement, and skill enhancement;
Educational assistance programs and student loan repayment assistance;
Internal educational and development opportunities; and
Fee reimbursement for external educational and development programs;
Management succession planning. The Bank’s board and leadership actively engage in succession planning, with a defined plan for our President-CEO, Executive Vice Presidents, and Senior Vice Presidents.


20
Table of Contents


The Bank’s performance management framework includes establishing individual performance goals tailored to reflect business and development objectives while also reflecting our Bank’s Guiding Principles for its corporate culture, mid-year performance check-ins, and annual performance reviews. Overall annual ratings are calibrated and salary adjustments are differentiated for the Bank’s highest performers.

The Bank is committed to the health, safety and wellness of its employees. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Bank has implemented significant operating environment changes, safety protocols and procedures that it determined were in the best interest of the Bank’s employees and members, and which comply with government regulations. In addition, nearly all of the Bank’s employees work remotely to support safety protocols.

Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Program.

Our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion program is a strategic business priority for the Bank. The Bank’s Senior Vice President – Chief Human Resources and Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer is a member of our executive management team, reports directly to our President-CEO, and serves as a liaison to the Board of Directors. The Bank recognizes that diversity increases capacity for innovation and creativity, that equity 3recognizes the essential contributions of all Bank employees, and that inclusion allows the Bank to leverage the unique perspectives of all employees and strengthens the Bank’s retention efforts. The Bank part-time employees. Employeesevaluates inclusive behaviors as part of the Bank’s annual performance management process. The Bank's commitment is demonstrated through the development and execution of a three-year Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Strategic Plan ("DEI Strategic Plan"). The DEI Strategic Plan focuses on Workforce, Workplace, Community, Supplier Diversity, and Capital Markets and includes quantifiable metrics to measure the program's success, which are not represented byreported regularly to senior management and the Board of Directors. The Bank considers learning an important component of its DEI Strategic Plan, so it offers a collective bargaining unit.range of opportunities for its employees to connect and grow personally and professionally through its Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion Council, cultural awareness events, and employee resource groups.

Available Information

Our Annual, Quarterly and QuarterlyCurrent Reports on Forms 10-K, and 10-Q, together with our Current Reports on Formand 8-K, are filed with the SEC through the EDGAR filing system. A link to EDGAR is available through our public website at www.fhlbi.com by selecting "News" and then "Investor Relations."

We have a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers ("Code of Ethics") that applies to our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer. We additionally have a Code of Conduct that is applicable to all directors, officers, and employees, and the membersConflict of ourInterest Policy for Affordable Housing Advisory Council.Council Members, a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy for Directors, and a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy for Employees and Contractors (collectively, the "Codes of Conduct"). The Code of Ethics and Codes of Conduct isare available on our website by scrolling to the bottom of any web page on www.fhlbi.com and then selecting "Corporate Governance" in the navigation menu.

Our 20202021 Targeted Community Lending Plan describes our plan to address the credit needs and market opportunities in our district states of Michigan and Indiana. It is available on our website at www.fhlbi.com/materials under "Bulletins, Publications, and Presentations."

Our Audit Committee operates under aThe written chartercharters adopted by the board of directors that was most recently amended on March 22, 2019. TheBoard for its Audit, Committee charter isExecutive/Governance, and Human Resources Committees are available on our website by scrolling to the bottom of any web page on www.fhlbi.com and then selecting "Corporate Governance" in the navigation menu. These charters were most recently amended by the board of directors as to the Audit Committee on March 19, 2020, as to the Executive/Governance Committee on January 7, 2020, and as to the Human Resources Committee on January 22, 2021.

We provide our website address and the SEC's website address solely for information. Except where expressly stated, information appearing on our website and the SEC's website is not incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Anyone may also request a copy of any of our public financial reports, our Code of Ethics, our Codes of Conduct, or our 20202021 Targeted Community Lending Plan through our Corporate Secretary at FHLBank of Indianapolis, 8250 Woodfield Crossing Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46240, (317) 465-0200.

1921
Table of Contents


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS
 
We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

We have identified the following risk factors that could have a material adverse effect on our Bank. There may be other risks and uncertainties, including those discussed elsewhere in this Form 10-K that are not described in these risk factors.

Business Risk - Economic

The COVID-19 Pandemic and Related Developments Have Created Substantial Economic and Financial Disruptions and Uncertainties As Well As Significant Operational Challenges, Which Could Heighten Many of the Risks We Face and Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition, Results of Operations, Ability to Pay Dividends and Redeem or Repurchase Capital Stock.

The pandemic caused by the outbreak of COVID-19 and governmental and public actions taken in response, such as shelter-in-place, stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions and business shutdowns, have reduced and may in the future significantly reduce economic activity and have created substantial uncertainty about the future economic environment. In addition, the pandemic and related developments have resulted in substantial disruptions in the financial markets, including dramatic increases in market volatility. There are no comparable recent events that provide guidance as to the effects that the COVID-19 pandemic and government actions may have. The ultimate effects of the pandemic, including its duration, speed and severity, the depth of the economic downturn and the timing and shape of the economic recovery, continue to evolve and are highly uncertain and difficult to predict. Although the economy improved in the second half of 2020, high levels of COVID-19 cases nationwide and new variants of the coronavirus have led to new governmental orders shutting down businesses. These circumstances could heighten many of the risks we face, and could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, ability to pay dividends and redeem or repurchase capital stock.

A prolonged economic downturn, or periods of significant economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties, resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic will lead to increased credit risk exposure (and possible increased risk of credit losses for us), in particular due to declines in the fair value of our assets or collateral securing our advances, due to member financial difficulties or failures, or from one or more members facing both circumstances together. Many businesses in our district and across the U.S. have been, and may in the future be, required by government orders to suspend or substantially curtail operations from time to time or for an indefinite time in an attempt to slow the spread of COVID-19, resulting in widespread employee layoffs and a dramatic increase in unemployment insurance claims. In turn, higher loan delinquencies stemming from rising unemployment, as well as the effects of mortgage forbearance and other debt relief, could reduce the fair value of our mortgage assets and mortgage-related collateral, and increase the Bank's exposure to credit losses in our MPP portfolio. Further, significant borrower defaults on loans made by our member institutions could occur as a result of the economic downturn, and these defaults could cause members to fail. We could be adversely impacted by the reduction in business volume that would arise from the failure of one or more of our members. Moreover, this significant slowdown in economic activity could reduce demand for our members’ products and services (other than residential mortgage), which could negatively impact our members’ demand for our products and services.

The disruptions to interest rates, credit spreads and the availability of funds in the capital markets in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic may adversely affect our access to funding as well as the valuation of and the market and book yields on our assets. Federal relief efforts designed to support the residential mortgage finance market have resulted in record-low mortgage rates and reduced member demand for our advances. These factors, coupled with variability in our members’ demands for advances, have challenged and may continue to challenge our ability to effectively manage our assets and liabilities (including the pricing of advances and AMA) and could adversely affect our profitability and liquidity.

In addition, the shelter-in-place, stay-at-home or similar orders, travel restrictions and business shutdowns or limitations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic have led to substantial changes in normal business practices, such as the implementation of work-from-home arrangements, for us as well as for many of our members, dealers, and other third-party service providers. Operational risk remains elevated due to these arrangements. Currently, most of our employees are working remotely. We have begun to plan for a return to the office, but cannot predict when such return will occur or that it will occur without increased risk to our workforce. In addition, more of our employees, management or board of directors could contract COVID-19, which, depending on the number and severity of such cases, could similarly affect our ability to conduct our business.


22
Table of Contents


We expect the success of ongoing vaccination efforts and further COVID-19 relief legislation to affect pandemic recovery efforts nationwide. Federal, state, and local relief measures could adversely affect our business, financial results, and financial conditions, such as by expanding or extending our obligations to help borrowers, renters or counterparties affected by the pandemic; imposing new or expanded business shut-downs; further increasing alternative sources of liquidity for our members in competition with our products and services; and increased risk of mortgage fraud in our AMA portfolio and member collateral arising from CARES Act and similar borrower forbearance measures. For more information, see Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments – Legislative and Regulatory Developments.

Economic Conditions and Policy, Global Political or Economic Events, a Major Natural Disaster, or Widespread Health Crises Could Have an Adverse Effect on Our Business, Liquidity, Financial Condition, and Results of OperationsOperations.

Our business, liquidity, financial condition, and results of operations are sensitive to general domestic and international business and economic conditions, such as changes in the money supply, inflation, volatility in both debt and equity capital markets, and the strength of the local economies in which we conduct business.

Our business and results of operations are significantly affected by the fiscal and monetary policies of the United States government and its agencies, including the FRBFederal Reserve through its regulation of the supply of money and credit in the United States. The FRB'sFederal Reserve's policies either directly or indirectly influence the yield on interest-earning assets, volatility of interest rates, prepayment speeds, the cost of interest-bearing liabilities and the demand for advances and for our debt. In addition, the FHLBanks currently play a predominant role as lenders in the federal funds market; therefore, any disruption in the federal funds market or any related regulatory or policy change may adversely affect our cash management activities, results of operations, and reputation.

Additionally, we are affected by the global economy through member ownership and investments, and through capital markets exposures. Global political, economic, and business uncertainty has led to increased volatility in capital markets and has the potential to drive volatility in the future. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom formally withdrew from membership in the European Union (the action commonly referred to as "Brexit"). Although we have not yet determined theThe full effects of Brexit this eventare not yet known, but it may cause greater global economic and business uncertainty. In addition, a major natural disaster or other catastrophic event, whether caused by climate change or otherwise, health crisis (such as the coronavirus)COVID-19 disease) or pandemic, as well as international responses to such events, could increase economic uncertainties and lead to further global capital market volatility, lower credit availability, and weaker economic growth. Our members, counterparties and vendors could experience similar negative effects. As a result, our business could be exposed to unfavorable market conditions, lower demand for mission-related assets, increased risk of credit losses, lower earnings, or reduced ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

The Federal Reserve's policies directly and indirectly influence the yield on our interest-bearing assets and the cost of our interest-bearing liabilities. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, on March 15, 2020, the FOMC lowered the target range for federal funds from 1.50% to 1.75% to a target range of 0.00% to 0.25%. The Federal Reserve additionally increased its holdings of U.S. Treasuries and Agency MBS, thereby lowering Agency MBS yields and increasing GSE purchase prices for conforming mortgages. The FOMC continues to maintain its policy of reinvesting principal payments from its securities holdings,the current low interest rate environment and of rolling over maturing United States Treasury securities at auction. During 2019, thecould set negative interest rates if economic conditions warrant. The Federal Reserve also lowered its target range for the Federal Funds rate. These policies are intended to help maintain accommodative financial conditions. However, the FRB'sReserve's continuing substantial participation in both short-term and MBS markets could continue to adversely affect us through lower yields on our investments, higher costs of debt, and disruption of member demand for our products.

Our business and results of operations are sensitive to the condition of the housing and mortgage markets, as well as general business and economic conditions. Adverse trends in the mortgage lending sector, including declines in home prices or loan performance, could reduce the value of collateral securing our advances and the fair value of our MBS. Such reductions in value would increase the possibility of under-collateralization, thereby increasing the risk of loss in case of a member's failure. Also, deterioration in the residential mortgage markets could negatively affect the value of our MPP portfolio, resulting in an increase in the allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans and possible additional realized losses if we were forced to liquidate our MPP portfolio.

Our district is comprised of the states of Michigan and Indiana. In the last several years, both states have experienced improving economic conditions. However, increasesIncreases in unemployment and foreclosure rates or decreases in job or income growth rates in either state could result in less demand for mission-related assets and therefore lower earnings. For more information, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Executive Summary - EconomicBusiness Environment.

20
Table of Contents


The Inability to Access Capital Markets on Acceptable Terms Could Adversely Affect Our Liquidity, Operations, Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Value of Membership in Our Bank

Our primary source of funds is the sale of consolidated obligations in the capital markets. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of consolidated obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, such as investor demand and liquidity, and on dealer commitment to inventory and support our debt. Severe financial and economic disruptions in the past, and the United States government's measures to mitigate their effects, including increased capital requirements on dealers' inventory and other regulatory changes affecting dealers, have changed the traditional bases on which market participants value GSE debt securities and consequently could affect our funding costs and practices, which could make it more difficult and more expensive to issue our debt. Any further disruption in the debt market could have an adverse impact on our interest spreads, opportunities to call and reissue existing debt or roll over maturing debt, or our ability to meet the Finance Agency's mandates on FHLBank liquidity.

A Cybersecurity Event; Interruption in Our Information Systems; Unavailability of, or an Interruption of Service at, Our Main Office or Our Backup Facilities; or Failure of or an Interruption in Information Systems of Third-Party Vendors or Service Providers Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Risk Management, Financial Condition, Results of Operations, and Reputation

Cybersecurity.

We rely heavily on our information systems and other technology to conduct and manage our business, which inherently involves large financial transactions with our members and other counterparties. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information in our computer systems and networks. These computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to breaches, unauthorized access, damage, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events that could potentially jeopardize the confidentiality of such information or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations. As malicious threat tactics continue to become more pervasive and more sophisticated, we are required to implement more advanced mitigating controls, which increases our mitigation costs. Moreover, if we experience a significant cybersecurity event, we may suffer significant financial or data loss, we may be unable to conduct and manage our business functions effectively, we may incur significant expenses in remediating such incidents, and we may suffer reputational harm. Any such occurrence could result in increased regulatory scrutiny of our operations. Although we carry cybersecurity insurance, its coverage may not be broad enough or adequate to cover losses we may incur if a significant cybersecurity event occurs.

Information Systems; Facilities; Unavailability or Interruption of Service.

In addition, our operations rely on the availability and functioning of our main office, our business resumption center and other facilities. If we experience a significant failure or interruption in our business continuity, disaster recovery or certain information systems, we may be unable to conduct and manage our business functions effectively, we may incur significant expenses in remediating such incidents, and we may suffer reputational harm. Moreover, any of these occurrences could result in increased regulatory scrutiny of our operations.

Office of Finance.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations, among other things. A failure or interruption of the Office of Finance's services as a result of breaches, cyber attacks, or technological outages could constrain or otherwise negatively affect the business operations of the FHLBanks, including disruptions to each FHLBank's access to funding through the sale of consolidated obligations. Moreover, any operational failure of the Office of Finance could expose us to the risk of loss of data or confidential information, or other harm, including reputational damage.
Other Third Parties.

Despite our policies, procedures, controls and initiatives, some operational risks are beyond our control, and the failure of other parties to adequately address their performance standards and operational risks could adversely affect us. In addition to internal computer systems, we outsource certain communication and information systems and other services critical to our business and regulatory compliance to third-party vendors and service providers, including derivatives clearing organizations and loan servicers.

21
Table of Contents


We are developing processes to accept electronically created and executed electronic notes – "e-notes" – in our business both as an approved collateral type, and as a class of mortgage note we purchase in our MPP. This includes developing mortgage note custody arrangements with a third-party "e-vault" format and use of a mortgage note "e-registry" for certain classes of e-notes, which will affect both our MPP processes and our collateral management processes. Using e-notes will create additional operations risk, particularly with respect to the safekeeping, storage and security of mortgage-related records by third parties, as well as potential differences across multiple jurisdictions regarding (i) the validity, enforceability and transferability of security interests in e-notes, (ii) the recording, transferability, and priority of associated security instruments, and (iii) execution requirements for e-notes and other associated instruments. Laws governing e-notes also vary depending on the class of transaction at the time of issue, with potentially different legal regimes for consumer mortgage notes, open-ended or revolving HELOCs, and non-consumer mortgage lending, such as in commercial real estate and multifamily secured lending. Different requirements for the use of e-notes in different markets (e.g., consumer mortgage, HELOC, and commercial) increase operational risk. In addition, there are uncertainties surrounding how any such assets will be treated or valued in their respective markets, if liquidated. We cannot predict our members’ appetites for using e-notes generally, or in any particular class of transaction. E-notes generally have not seen wide adoption, and we cannot predict market acceptance for e-notes for any asset types.

Compromised security or operational errors at any third party with whom we conduct business, or at any third party's contractors, could expose us to cyber attacks, other breaches or service failures or interruptions. If one or more of these key external parties were not able to perform their functions for a period of time, at an acceptable service level, or with increased volumes, our business operations could be constrained, disrupted, or otherwise negatively affected. In addition, any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems, any disruption of service, or any key external party's failure to perform its contractual obligations could result in failures or interruptions in our ability to conduct and manage our business effectively, including, without limitation, our advances, MPP, funding, hedging activities and regulatory compliance. There is no assurance that such failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be timely detected or adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely. Any failure, interruption, or breach could significantly harm our customer relations and business operations, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

A Loss of Significant Borrowers, PFIs, Acceptable Loan Servicers or Other Financial Counterparties Could Adversely Impact Our Profitability, Our Ability to Achieve Business Objectives, Our Ability to Pay Dividends or Redeem or Repurchase Capital Stock, and Our Risk Concentration

The loss of any large borrower or PFI could adversely impact our profitability and our ability to achieve business objectives. The loss of a large borrower or PFI could result from a variety of factors, including acquisition, consolidation of charters within a bank holding company, a member's loss of market share, resolution of a financially distressed member, or regulatory changes relating to FHLBank membership.

Our top borrower had advances outstanding at December 31, 2019 totaling $4.3 billion, or 13% of the Bank's total advances outstanding, at par. Our top-selling PFI sold us mortgage loans during 2019 totaling $255 million, or 20% of the total mortgage loans purchased by the Bank in 2019.

Our larger PFIs originate mortgages on properties in several states. We also purchase mortgage loans from many smaller PFIs that predominantly originate mortgage loans on properties in Michigan and Indiana. Our concentration of MPP loans on properties in Michigan and Indiana could continue to increase over time, as we do not currently limit such concentration.

We do not service the mortgage loans we purchase. PFIs may elect to retain servicing rights for the loans sold to us, or they may elect to sell servicing rights to an MPP-approved servicer. Federal banking regulations and Dodd-Frank Act capital requirements are causing some mortgage servicing rights to be transitioned to non-depository institutions and may reduce the availability of buyers of mortgage servicing rights. A scarcity of mortgage servicers could adversely affect our results of operations.

The number of counterparties that meet our internal and regulatory standards for derivative, repurchase, federal funds sold, TBA, and other financial transactions, such as broker-dealers and their affiliates, has decreased over time. In addition, since the Dodd-Frank Act, the requirements for posting margin or other collateral to financial counterparties has tended to increase, both in terms of the amount of collateral to be posted and the types of transactions for which margin is now required. These factors tend to increase the risk exposure that we have to any one counterparty, and as such may tend to increase our reliance upon each of our counterparties. A failure of any one of our major financial counterparties, or continuing market consolidation, could affect our profitability, results of operations, and ability to enter into additional transactions with existing counterparties without exceeding internal or regulatory risk limits.
22
Table of Contents


Changes to or Replacement of the LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Many of our assets and liabilities are indexed to LIBOR. On July 27, 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), a regulator of financial services firms and financial markets in the United Kingdom, announced that it will plan for a phase-out of regulatory oversight of LIBOR interest rate indices. The FCA indicated that it will cease persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021, and that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. The FCA further indicated, however, that it will support the LIBOR indices through 2021 to allow for an orderly transition to an alternative reference rate. Under these circumstances, there is no assurance that LIBOR will continue to be accepted or used by the markets generally or by any issuers, investors, or counterparties at any time, even if LIBOR continues to be available.

On September 27, 2019, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter to the FHLBanks ("Supervisory Letter") relating to their planning for the LIBOR phase-out. With respect to investments, the Supervisory Letter directed that, by December 31, 2019, the FHLBanks stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. In addition, for all product types except investments, the FHLBanks should, by March 31, 2020, no longer enter into new financial assets, liabilities or derivatives that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. Further, the Supervisory Letter directs that the FHLBanks update their pledged collateral certification reporting requirements by March 31, 2020 in an effort to encourage members to distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral maturing past December 31, 2021.

As a result of the limitations introduced by the Supervisory Letter, we have had to alter our hedging strategies and interest-rate risk management. Such activities may have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we may experience less flexibility in our access to funding, higher funding costs, or lower overall demand or increased costs for advances, which in turn may negatively affect the future composition of our balance sheet, capital stock levels, primary mission assets ratios, and net income.

In the United States, efforts to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") of the FRB and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The ARRC has proposed the SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing a SOFR in the second quarter of 2018. In January 2019, we began participating in the issuance of SOFR-indexed CO bonds.

The market transition away from LIBOR to SOFR is expected to be complicated, including the development of terms and credit adjustments to accommodate differences between LIBOR and SOFR. The introduction of an alternative rate also may introduce additional basis risk for market participants, as an alternative index is utilized along with LIBOR during a transition period. During the market transition away from LIBOR, LIBOR may experience increased volatility or become less representative, and the overnight Treasury repurchase market underlying SOFR may also experience disruptions from time to time, which may result in unexpected fluctuations in SOFR.

There can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely used or that alternative rates will not cause additional complications. The infrastructure necessary to manage hedging utilizing SOFR still needs to be built, and the transition in the markets and adjustments in our systems could be disruptive, with disruptions potentially beginning before the currently-planned phase-out of FCA support of LIBOR. A mechanism is not yet well-established to convert the credit and tenor features of LIBOR into any proposed replacement rate because markets which could facilitate such conversion are new and currently lack depth or liquidity. Moreover, there is no guarantee that, if the market is fully functioning at the time of the transition, the transition will be successful. Similarly, the transition from one reference rate to another could have accounting effects. For example, such transition could have an effect on our hedge effectiveness, which could affect our results of operations. Additionally, our risk management measuring, monitoring and valuation tools utilize LIBOR as a reference rate. Disruptions in the market for LIBOR and its regulatory framework, therefore, could have unanticipated effects on our risk management activities as well.


23
Table of Contents


Given the large volume of LIBOR-based mortgagesBusiness Risk - Legislative and financial instruments, and the size of our Agency MBS portfolio that utilizes a LIBOR-rate index, the basis adjustment to the replacement floating rate may have a significant impact on our financial results, but whether the net impact is positive or negative cannot yet be ascertained. We believe that other market participants, including our member institutions, derivatives clearing organizations, and other financial counterparties are also monitoring the LIBOR transition, but we cannot predict how such institutions will react to the transition, or what effects such reactions will have on us. We are not able to predict at this time whether LIBOR will cease to be available after 2021, whether SOFR or another alternative rate will become the sole market benchmark in place of LIBOR, whether the transitions to new reference rates will be successful, or what the impact of such a transition will be on the Bank's business, financial condition or results of operations.Regulatory

Changes in the Legal and Regulatory Environment for FHLBanks, Other Housing GSEs or Our Members May Adversely Affect Our Business, Demand for Products, the Cost of Debt Issuance, and the Value of FHLBank MembershipMembership.

We could be materially adversely affected by: the adoption of new or revised laws, policies, regulations or accounting guidance; new or revised interpretations or applications of laws, policies, or regulations by the Finance Agency, the SEC, the CFTC, the CFPB, the Financial Stability Oversight Council, the Comptroller General, the FASB or other federal or state financial regulatory bodies; or judicial decisions that alter the present regulatory environment. Likewise, whenever federal elections result in changes in the executive branch or in the balance of political parties’ representation in Congress, there is increased uncertainty as to potential administrative, regulatory and legislative actions that may materially adversely affect our business.

Changes that restrict the growth or alter the risk profile of our current business or limit or prohibit the creation of new products or services could negatively impact our earnings and reduce the value of FHLBank membership. For example, our earnings could be negatively impacted by legislative or regulatory changes that (i) reduce demand for advances or limit advances we make to our members, (ii) further restrict the products and services we are able to provide to our members or how we do business with our members and counterparties, (iii) further restrict the types, characteristics or volume of mortgages that we may purchase through our MPP or otherwise reduce the economic value of MPP to our members, or (iv) otherwise require us to change the composition of our assets and liabilities. Our inability to adapt products and services to evolving industry standards and customer preferences in a highly competitive and regulated environment, while managing our expenses, could harm our business.

In addition, the regulatory environment in which our members provide financial products and services could be changed in a manner that negatively impacts their ability to take full advantage of our products and services, their desire to maintain membership in our Bank, or our ability to rely on their pledged collateral. Additionally, changes to the regulatory environment that affect our debt underwriters, particularly revised capital and liquidity requirements, could also adversely affect our cost of issuing debt in the capital markets.

Similarly, regulatory actions or public policy changes, including those that give preference to certain sectors, business models, regulated entities, assets, or activities, could negatively impact us. For example, changes in the status of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac during the next phases of their conservatorships or as a result of legislative or regulatory changes, may impact funding costs for the FHLBanks, which could negatively affect our business and results of operations. In addition, negative news articles, industry reports, and other announcements pertaining to GSEs, including Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac or the FHLBanks, could cause an increase in interest rates on all GSE debt, as investors may perceive these issuers or their debt instruments as bearing increased risk.

The Finance Agency’s Advisory Bulletin 2018-07 on liquidity became fully effective as of December 31, 2019. This advisory bulletin communicates the Finance Agency’s expectations with respect to the maintenance of sufficient liquidity to enable the FHLBanks to provide advances and standby letters of credit ("SLOCs") for their members. Contemporaneously with the issuance of this advisory bulletin, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter that identifies initial thresholds for measures of liquidity within the established ranges set forth in the bulletin.

The advisory bulletin on liquidity not only provides direction on the level of on-balance sheet liquid assets related to base case liquidity, but as part of the base case liquidity measure, the advisory bulletin also includes a separate provision covering off-balance sheet commitments for SLOCs.


24
Table of Contents


In addition, the advisory bulletin provides direction related to asset/liability maturity funding gap limits. Specifically, with respect to funding gaps and possible asset and liability mismatches, the advisory bulletin provides guidance on maintaining appropriate funding gaps for three-month and one-year maturity horizons. Initial percentages within prescribed ranges are identified in the supervisory letter. The advisory bulletin provides these limits to reduce the liquidity risks associated with a mismatch in asset and liability maturities.

The advisory bulletin may requirehas required us to hold an additional amount of liquid assets, which could reducehas reduced our ability to invest in higher-yielding assets. In certain circumstances we may also need to fund shorter-term advances with short-term discount notes that have maturities beyond those of the related advances, thus increasing our short-term advance pricing or reducing net income through lower net interest spreads. To the extent these increased prices make our advances less competitive, advance levels and net interest income may be negatively affected. Conversely, our cost of funding may increase if the advisory bulletin requires us to achieve appropriate funding gaps with longer-term funding.

On January 31, 2020, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2020-01 to provide guidance regarding an FHLBank's risk management
24
Table of its AMA portfolio. The advisory bulletin requires an FHLBank's board of directors to establish various limits to control AMA-related risks, relating to AMA portfolio size, loan concentration, third-party loan originations, pricing, or other metrics. In turn, the advisory bulletin requires FHLBank management to establish thresholds below the board-established limits to serve as monitoring tools to manage AMA-related risk exposure. The FHLBanks should be able to demonstrate their progress towards adherence to this advisory bulletin by September 30, 2020 and are expected to have their final risk limits in place by December 31, 2020. The Finance Agency may issue a supervisory letter if it deems the board-established limits to be insufficient. The limits to be imposed pursuant to the advisory bulletin could have a material adverse effect on our MPP business.Contents


The CFPB rules include standards for mortgage lenders to follow during the loan approval process to determine whether a borrower has the ability to repay the mortgage loan. The Dodd-Frank Act provides defenses to foreclosure and causes of action for damages if the mortgage lender does not meet the standards in the CFPB rules. A mortgage borrower can assert these defenses and causes of action against the original mortgage lender and against purchasers and other assignees of the mortgage loan, which would include us if we were to purchase a loan under our AMA programs or if we were to direct a servicer to foreclose on mortgage loan collateral. In addition, if we were to make advances secured by non-safe harbor qualified mortgages retained by a mortgage lender and subsequently were to liquidate such collateral, we could be subject to these defenses to foreclosure or causes of action for damages. This risk, in turn, could reduce the value of our advances collateral, potentially reducing our likelihood of full repayment on our advances if we were required to sell such collateral.

Regulatory reform since the most recent financial crisis has tended to increase the amount of margin collateral that we must provide to collateralize certain kinds of financial transactions, and has broadened the categories of transactions for which we are required to post margin. For example, the Dodd-Frank Act and related regulatory changes have increased the margin we must provide for cleared and uncleared derivative transactions and, effective in MarchOctober 2021, Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") Rule 4210 will require us to exchange margin on certain MBS transactions. Materially greater margin requirements - due to Dodd-Frank Act derivatives regulatory requirements, FINRA Rule 4210, or otherwise - could adversely affect the availability and pricing of our derivative transactions, making such trades more costly and less attractive as risk management tools. New and expanded margin requirements on derivatives and MBS could also change our risk exposure to our counterparties and may require us to enhance further our systems and processes.

New and amended rules promulgated by our members' primary regulators may create unanticipated risks as well. For example, the largest members of the FHLBank System may have increased their advances levels in order to meet Basel III regulatory requirements. At the same time, changes to SEC guidance pertaining to prime money market funds have resulted in a significant increase in demand for government funds and Agency debt, as well as FHLBank discount notes. These developments could influence regulatory guidance, particularly with respect to liquidity. We cannot predict what effects, if any, these developments will have on the FHLBank System as a whole or upon our Bank, nor can we predict what additional regulatory actions may be taken as a result.

For more information, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments - Legislative and Regulatory Developments.


25
Table of Contents


Competition Could Negatively Impact Advances, the Supply of Mortgage Loans for our MPP, Our Access to Funding and Our Earnings

We operate in a highly competitive environment. Demand for advances is affected by, among other factors, the cost and availability of other sources of liquidity for our members, including customer deposits, brokered deposits, reciprocal deposits and public funds. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured. Such other suppliers may include the United States government, the Federal Reserve Banks, corporate credit unions, the Central Liquidity Facility, investment banks, commercial banks, and in certain circumstances other FHLBanks. Large institutions may also have independent access to the national and global credit markets. Also, the availability of alternative funding sources to members, such as growth in deposits from members' banking customers, can significantly influence the demand for advances and can vary as a result of several factors, including legislative or regulatory changes, market conditions, members' creditworthiness, and availability of collateral. Lower demand for advances will negatively impact our earnings.

Likewise, our MPP is subject to significant competition. Direct competition for purchases of mortgages comes from other buyers of conventional, conforming, fixed-rate mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In addition, PFIs face increased origination competition from originators that are not members of our Bank. Increased competition can result in a smaller share of the mortgages available for purchase through our MPP and, therefore, lower earnings.

We also compete with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities for funds raised through the issuance of CO bonds and discount notes. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs to us or lesser amounts of debt issued at the same cost than otherwise would be the case. There can be no assurance that our supply of funds through issuance of consolidated obligations will be sufficient to meet our future operational needs.

Changes in Interest Rates or Changes in the Differences Between Short-Term Rates and Long-Term Rates Could Have an Adverse Effect on Our Earnings

Our ability to prepare for changes in interest rates, or to hedge related exposures such as basis risk, significantly affects the success of our asset and liability management activities and our level of net interest income.

The effect of interest rate changes can be exacerbated by prepayment and extension risks, which are the risks that mortgage-based investments will be refinanced by borrowers in low interest-rate environments or will remain outstanding longer than expected at below-market yields when interest rates increase. Decreases in interest rates typically cause mortgage prepayments to increase, which may result in increased premium amortization expense and a decrease in the yield of our mortgage assets as we experience a return of principal that we must re-invest in a lower rate environment. While these prepayments would reduce the asset balance, our balance of consolidated obligations may remain outstanding. Conversely, increases in interest rates typically cause mortgage prepayments to decrease or mortgage cash flows to slow, possibly resulting in the debt funding the portfolio to mature and the replacement debt to be issued at a higher cost, thus reducing our interest spread.

A flattening or inverted yield curve, in which the difference between short-term interest rates and long-term interest rates is lower or negative, respectively, relative to prior market conditions, will tend to reduce, and has reduced, the net interest margin on new loans added to the MPP portfolio. Until such time as the yield curve becomes steeper, we may continue to earn lower spread income from that portfolio.

Although derivatives are used to mitigate market risk, they also introduce the potential for short-term earnings volatility, principally due to basis risk because we must use the OIS curve in place of the LIBOR rate curve as the discount rate to estimate the fair values of collateralized LIBOR-based interest-rate related derivatives while substantially all of the hedged items currently on the balance sheet are still valued using the LIBOR rate curve. Additionally, our U.S. Treasury liquidity portfolio is economically hedged with OIS interest rate swaps and may introduce income volatility due to non-symmetrical changes in U.S. Treasury rates and OIS swap rates.


26
Table of Contents


A Failure of the Business and Financial Models and Related Processes Used to Evaluate Various Financial Risks and Derive Certain Estimates in Our Financial Statements Could Produce Unreliable Projections or Valuations, which Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition, Results of Operations and Risk Management

We are exposed to market, business and operational risk, in part due to the significant use of business and financial models when evaluating various financial risks and deriving certain estimates in our financial statements. Our business could be adversely affected if these models fail to produce reliable projections or valuations. These models, which rely on various inputs including, but not limited to, loan volumes and pricing, market conditions for our consolidated obligations, interest-rate spreads and prepayment speeds, implied volatility of options contracts, and cash flows on mortgage-related assets, require management to make critical judgments about the appropriate assumptions that are used in the determinations of such risks and estimates and may overstate or understate the value of certain financial instruments, future performance expectations, or our level of risk exposure. Our models could produce unreliable results for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, invalid or incorrect assumptions underlying the models, the need for manual adjustments in response to rapid changes in economic conditions, incorrect coding of the models, incorrect data being used by the models or inappropriate application of a model to products or events outside the model's intended use. In particular, models are less dependable when the economic environment is outside of historical experience, as has been the case in recent years.

A Failure to Meet Minimum Regulatory Capital Requirements Could Affect Our Ability to Pay Dividends, Redeem or Repurchase Capital Stock, Retain Existing Members and Attract New MembersMembers.

We are required to maintain sufficient capital to meet specific minimum requirements established by the Finance Agency. If we violate any of these requirements or if our board or the Finance Agency determines that we have incurred, or are likely to incur, losses resulting, or expected to result, in a charge against capital, we would not be able to redeem or repurchase any capital stock while such charges are continuing or expected to continue, even if the statutory redemption period had expired for some or all of such stock. Violations of, or regulator-mandated adjustments to, our capital requirements could also restrict our ability to pay dividends, lend, invest, or purchase mortgage loans or participating interests in mortgage loans, or other business activities. Moreover, the Finance Agency could set varying expectations for FHLBanks’ capital levels in ways that have potentially negative impacts on FHLBanks’ business activities. Additionally, the Finance Agency could direct us to call upon our members to purchase additional capital stock to meet our minimum regulatory capital requirements. Members may be unable or unwilling to satisfy such calls for additional capital, thereby adversely affecting their ability to continue doing business with us and their desire to remain as members. Moreover, failure to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase stock at par, or a call upon our members to purchase additional stock to restore capital, could make it more difficult for us to attract new members.

The formula for calculating risk-based capital includes factors that depend on interest rates and other market metrics outside our control and could cause our minimum requirement to increase to a point exceeding our capital level. Further, if our retained earnings were to become inadequate, the Finance Agency could initiate restrictions consistent with those associated with a failure of a minimum capital requirement.

On December 16, 2019,
25
Table of Contents


Restrictions on the Redemption, Repurchase, or Transfer of the Bank's Capital Stock Could Result in an Illiquid Investment for the Holder.

Under the GLB Act, Finance Agency publishedregulations, and our capital plan, our capital stock may be redeemed upon the expiration of a proposed amendmentfive-year redemption period, subject to certain conditions. Capital stock may become subject to redemption following the redemption period after a member (i) provides a written redemption notice to the Bank; (ii) gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; (iii) attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or (iv) has its stress testing rule,Bank capital stock transferred by a receiver or other liquidating agent for that member to whicha nonmember entity. Only capital stock that is not required to meet a member's membership capital stock requirement or to support a member or nonmember shareholder's outstanding activity with the FHLBanks are currently subject. The proposed amendment would conformBank (excess capital stock) may be redeemed at the rule to section 401end of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief,redemption period. In addition, we may elect to repurchase some or all of the excess capital stock of a shareholder at any time at our sole discretion.

There is no guarantee, however, that we will be able to redeem shareholders' capital stock, even at the end of the prescribed redemption period, or to repurchase their excess capital stock. If a redemption or repurchase of capital stock would cause us to fail to meet our minimum regulatory capital requirements, Finance Agency regulations and Consumer Protection Actour capital plan would prohibit the redemption or repurchase. Restrictions on the redemption or repurchase of our capital stock could result in an illiquid investment for holders of our stock. In addition, because our capital stock may only be owned by increasingour members (or, under certain circumstances, former members and certain successor institutions), and our capital plan requires our approval before a member or nonmember shareholder may transfer any of its capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder, we cannot provide assurance that we would allow a member or nonmember shareholder to transfer any excess capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder at any time.

Business Risk - Strategic

A Loss of Significant Borrowers, PFIs, Acceptable Loan Servicers or Other Financial Counterparties Could Adversely Impact Our Profitability, Our Ability to Achieve Business Objectives, Our Ability to Pay Dividends or Redeem or Repurchase Capital Stock, and Our Risk Concentration.

The loss of any large borrower or PFI could adversely impact our profitability and our ability to achieve business objectives. The loss of a large borrower or PFI could result from a variety of factors, including acquisition, consolidation of charters within a bank holding company, a member's loss of market share, resolution of a financially distressed member, or regulatory changes relating to FHLBank membership.

Our top borrower had advances outstanding at December 31, 2020 totaling $4.6 billion, or 15% of the minimum threshold for requiring stress testingBank's total advances outstanding, at par. Our top-selling PFI sold us mortgage loans during 2020 totaling $138 million, or 7% of the total mortgage loans purchased by the regulated entitiesBank in 2020.

Our larger PFIs originate mortgages on properties in several states. We also purchase mortgage loans from $10 billionmany smaller PFIs that predominantly originate mortgage loans on properties in Michigan and Indiana. Our concentration of MPP loans on properties in Michigan and Indiana could continue to $250 billion. As no FHLBank's total consolidated assetsincrease over time, as we do not currently exceed $250 billion,limit such concentration.

We do not service the proposal would generally relievemortgage loans we purchase. PFIs may elect to retain servicing rights for the FHLBanksloans sold to us, or they may elect to sell servicing rights to an MPP-approved servicer. Federal banking regulations and Dodd-Frank Act capital requirements are causing some mortgage servicing rights to be transitioned to non-depository institutions and may reduce the availability of stress testing requirements. Under the proposed rule, however, the Finance Agency Director would retain the authority and discretion to impose stress testing requirements on any FHLBank with assets below the $250 billion threshold. If we remain subject to those requirements, thebuyers of mortgage servicing rights. A scarcity of mortgage servicers could adversely affect our results of operations.

The number of counterparties that meet our internal and regulatory standards for derivative, repurchase, federal funds sold, TBA, and other financial transactions, such as broker-dealers and their affiliates, has decreased over time. In addition, since the stress testing processDodd-Frank Act, the requirements for posting margin or other collateral to financial counterparties has tended to increase, both in terms of the amount of collateral to be posted and the types of transactions for which margin is now required. These factors tend to increase the risk exposure that we have to any one counterparty, and as such may tend to increase our reliance upon each of our counterparties. A failure of any one of our major financial counterparties, or continuing market consolidation, could affect our approachprofitability, results of operations, and ability to managing and deploying capital. The stress testing and capital planning processes could, among other things, require us to increase our capital levels, modify our business strategies,enter into additional transactions with existing counterparties without exceeding internal or decrease our exposure to various asset classes.regulatory risk limits.


26
Table of Contents


Competition Could Negatively Impact Advances, the Supply of Mortgage Loans for our MPP, Our Access to Funding and Our Earnings.

We operate in a highly competitive environment. Demand for advances is affected by, among other factors, the cost and availability of other sources of liquidity for our members, including customer deposits, brokered deposits, reciprocal deposits and public funds. We compete with other suppliers of wholesale funding, both secured and unsecured. Such other suppliers may include the United States government, the Federal Reserve Banks, corporate credit unions, the Central Liquidity Facility, investment banks, commercial banks, and in certain circumstances other FHLBanks. Large institutions may also have independent access to the national and global credit markets. Also, the availability of alternative funding sources to members, such as growth in deposits from members' banking customers, can significantly influence the demand for advances and can vary as a result of several factors, including legislative or regulatory changes, market conditions, members' creditworthiness, and availability of collateral. Lower demand for advances will negatively impact our earnings.

Likewise, our MPP is subject to significant competition. Direct competition for purchases of mortgages comes from other buyers of conventional, conforming, fixed-rate mortgage loans, such as Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac. In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Federal Reserve materially increased their purchases of Agency MBS, thereby increasing GSE purchase prices for conforming mortgages and reducing demand for our MPP.

In addition, PFIs face increased origination competition from originators that are not members of our Bank. Increased competition can result in a smaller share of the mortgages available for purchase through our MPP and, therefore, lower earnings.

We also compete with Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, and other GSEs as well as corporate, sovereign, and supranational entities for funds raised through the issuance of CO bonds and discount notes. Increases in the supply of competing debt products may, in the absence of increases in demand, result in higher debt costs to us or lesser amounts of debt issued at the same cost than otherwise would be the case. There can be no assurance that our supply of funds through issuance of consolidated obligations will be sufficient to meet our future operational needs.

Downgrades of Our Credit Rating, the Credit Rating of One or More of the Other FHLBanks, or the Credit Rating of the Consolidated Obligations Could Adversely Impact Our Cost of Funds, Our Ability to Access the Capital Markets, and/or Our Ability to Enter Into Derivative Instrument Transactions on Acceptable Terms.

The FHLBanks' consolidated obligations are rated Aaa/P-1 with a stable outlook by Moody's and AA+/A-1+ with a stable outlook by S&P. Rating agencies may from time to time lower a rating or issue negative reports. Because each FHLBank has joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, negative developments at any FHLBank may affect these credit ratings or result in the issuance of a negative report regardless of an individual FHLBank's financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because of the FHLBanks' GSE status, the credit ratings of the respective FHLBanks are generally influenced by the sovereign credit rating of the United States.

Based on the credit rating agencies' criteria, downgrades to the United States' sovereign credit rating and outlook may occur. As a result, similar downgrades in the credit ratings and outlook on the FHLBanks and the FHLBanks' consolidated obligations may also occur, even though they are not obligations of the United States.

Uncertainty remains regarding possible longer-term effects resulting from rating actions. Any future downgrades in the credit ratings and outlook, especially a downgrade to an S&P AA rating or equivalent, could result in higher funding costs, additional collateral posting requirements for certain derivative instrument transactions, or disruptions in our access to capital markets. To the extent that we cannot access funding when needed on acceptable terms to effectively manage our cost of funds, our financial condition and results of operations and the value of membership in our Bank may be negatively affected.


27
Table of Contents


The Inability to Identify Eligible Nominees for our Board of Directors and to Attract and Retain Key Personnel Could Adversely Affect the Bank's Operations.

Under the Bank Act, at least 40% of our board of directors' seats must be held by independent directors, who must meet certain specialized and narrow eligibility requirements (including citizenship, residency and expertise) but are subject to specific term limits, as described in Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance - Board of Directors. We currently have eight independent directors on our board. Two of the independent directors will be term-limited as of December 31, 2021, and one other will be term-limited as of December 31, 2022; all three have served as directors of the Bank for 12 or more years. Our board has established a Succession Planning Committee to assist the board with respect to succession planning for directorships. As a result of the statutory limitations, however, we may be challenged in our ability to find prospective independent directors that meet the eligibility requirements.

We rely on key personnel for many of our functions and have a relatively small workforce, given the size and complexity of our business. Our ability to attract and retain personnel with the required technical expertise and specialized skills is important for us to manage our business and conduct our operations. Such ability could be challenged as employment in the United States improves.

Credit Risk

An Increase in Our Exposure to Credit Losses Could Adversely Affect Our Financial Condition and Results of OperationsOperations.

We are exposed to credit risk as part of our normal business operations through member products, investment securities and counterparty obligations. Periods of economic downturn, and periods of economic and financial disruptions and uncertainties, such as being experienced from the COVID-19 pandemic, may increase credit risk.

Member Products.

Advances. If a member fails and the appointed receiver or rehabilitator (or another applicable entity) does not either (i) promptly repay all of the failed institution's obligations to our Bank or (ii) properly assign or assume the outstanding advances, we may be required to liquidate the collateral pledged by the failed institution. The proceeds realized from the liquidation may not be sufficient to fully satisfy the amount of the failed institution's obligations plus the operational cost of liquidation, particularly if market price and interest-rate volatility adversely affect the value of the collateral. Price volatility could also adversely impact our determination of over-collateralization requirements, which could ultimately cause a collateral deficiency in a liquidation scenario. In some cases, we may not be able to liquidate the collateral for the value assigned to it or in a timely manner. Any of these scenarios could cause us to experience a credit loss, which in turn could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.

A deterioration of residential or commercial real estate property values could further affect the mortgages pledged as collateral for advances. In order to remain fully collateralized, we may require members to pledge additional collateral when we deem it necessary. If members are unable to fully collateralize their obligations with us, our advances could decrease further, negatively affecting our results of operations or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

Mortgage Loans. If delinquencies in our fixed-rate mortgages increase and residential property values decline, we could experience reduced yields or losses exceeding the protection provided by the LRA and SMI credit enhancement and CE obligations, as applicable, on mortgage loans purchased through our MPP or the participating interests in MPF Program loans acquired from the FHLBank of Topeka or another MPF FHLBank.

We are the beneficiary of third-party PMI and SMI (where applicable) coverage on conventional mortgage loans that we acquire through our MPP, and we rely in part on such coverage to reduce the risk of losses on those loans. As a result of actions by their respective state insurance regulators, however, certain of our PMI providers may pay less than 100% of the claim amounts. The remaining amounts are deferred until the funds are available or the PMI provider is liquidated. It is possible that insurance regulators may impose restrictions on the ability of our other PMI/SMI providers to pay claims. If our PMI/SMI providers further reduce the portion of mortgage insurance claims they will pay to us or further delay or condition the payment of mortgage insurance claims, or if additional adverse actions are taken by their state insurance regulators, we could experience higher losses on mortgage loans.

We are also exposed to credit losses from servicers of mortgage loans purchased under our MPP or through participating interests in mortgage loans purchased from other FHLBanks under the MPF Program if they fail to perform their contractual obligations.
28
Table of Contents


Investment Securities. The MBS market continues to face uncertainty over the potential changes in the Federal Reserve's holdings of MBS and the effect of any new or proposed actions. Additionally, future declines in housing prices, as well as other factors, such as increased loan default rates and loss severities and decreased prepayment speeds, may result in unrealized losses, which could adversely affect our financial condition.

We are also exposed to credit losses from third-party providers of credit enhancements on the MBS investments that we hold in our investment portfolios, including mortgage insurers, bond insurers and financial guarantors. Our results of operations could be adversely impacted if one or more of these providers fails to fulfill its contractual obligations to us.

Counterparty Obligations.Obligations. We assume unsecured credit risk when entering into money market transactions and financial derivatives transactions with domestic and foreign counterparties or through derivatives clearing organizations. A counterparty default could result in losses if our credit exposure to that counterparty is not fully collateralized or if our credit obligations associated with derivative positions are over-collateralized. The insolvency or other inability of a significant counterparty, including a clearing organization, to perform its obligations under such transactions or other agreements could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations, as well as our ability to engage in routine derivative transactions. If we are unable to transact additional business with those counterparties, our ability to effectively use derivatives could be adversely affected, which could impair our ability to manage some aspects of our interest-rate risk.

28
Table of Contents


Moreover, our ability to engage in routine derivatives, funding and other transactions could be adversely affected by the actions and commercial soundness of financial institutions that transact business with our counterparties. Financial services institutions are interrelated as a result of trading, clearing, counterparty and/or other relationships. Consequently, financial difficulties experienced by one or more financial services institutions could lead to market-wide disruptions that may impair our ability to find suitable counterparties for routine business transactions.

Downgrades of Our Credit Rating, the Credit Rating of One or More of the Other FHLBanks, or the Credit Rating of the Consolidated Obligations Could Adversely Impact Our Cost of Funds, Our Ability to Access the Capital Markets, and/or Our Ability to Enter Into Derivative Instrument Transactions on Acceptable Terms

The FHLBanks' consolidated obligations are rated Aaa/P-1 with a stable outlook by Moody's and AA+/A-1+ with a stable outlook by S&P. Rating agencies may from time to time lower a rating or issue negative reports. Because each FHLBank has joint and several liability for all FHLBank consolidated obligations, negative developments at any FHLBank may affect these credit ratings or result in the issuance of a negative report regardless of an individual FHLBank's financial condition and results of operations. In addition, because of the FHLBanks' GSE status, the credit ratings of the respective FHLBanks are generally influenced by the sovereign credit rating of the United States.

Based on the credit rating agencies' criteria, downgrades to the United States' sovereign credit rating and outlook may occur. As a result, similar downgrades in the credit ratings and outlook on the FHLBanks and the FHLBanks' consolidated obligations may also occur, even though they are not obligations of the United States.

Uncertainty remains regarding possible longer-term effects resulting from rating actions. Any future downgrades in the credit ratings and outlook, especially a downgrade to an S&P AA rating or equivalent, could result in higher funding costs, additional collateral posting requirements for certain derivative instrument transactions, or disruptions in our access to capital markets. To the extent that we cannot access funding when needed on acceptable terms to effectively manage our cost of funds, our financial condition and results of operations and the value of membership in our Bank may be negatively affected.

Restrictions on the Redemption, Repurchase, or Transfer of the Bank's Capital Stock Could Result in an Illiquid Investment for the Holder

Under the GLB Act, Finance Agency regulations, and our capital plan, our capital stock may be redeemed upon the expiration of a five-year redemption period, subject to certain conditions. Capital stock may become subject to redemption following the redemption period after a member (i) provides a written redemption notice to the Bank; (ii) gives notice of intention to withdraw from membership; (iii) attains nonmember status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, or other involuntary membership termination; or (iv) has its Bank capital stock transferred by a receiver or other liquidating agent for that member to a nonmember entity. Only capital stock that is not required to meet a member's membership capital stock requirement or to support a member or nonmember shareholder's outstanding activity with the Bank (excess capital stock) may be redeemed at the end of the redemption period. In addition, we may elect to repurchase some or all of the excess capital stock of a shareholder at any time at our sole discretion.

There is no guarantee, however, that we will be able to redeem shareholders' capital stock, even at the end of the prescribed redemption period, or to repurchase their excess capital stock. If a redemption or repurchase of capital stock would cause us to fail to meet our minimum regulatory capital requirements, Finance Agency regulations and our capital plan would prohibit the redemption or repurchase. Restrictions on the redemption or repurchase of our capital stock could result in an illiquid investment for holders of our stock. In addition, because our capital stock may only be owned by our members (or, under certain circumstances, former members and certain successor institutions), and our capital plan requires our approval before a member or nonmember shareholder may transfer any of its capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder, we cannot provide assurance that we would allow a member or nonmember shareholder to transfer any excess capital stock to another member or nonmember shareholder at any time.


29
Table of Contents


Providing Financial Support to Other FHLBanks Could Negatively Impact the Bank's Liquidity, Earnings and Capital and Our MembersMembers.

We are jointly and severally liable with the other FHLBanks for the consolidated obligations issued on behalf of the FHLBanks through the Office of Finance. If another FHLBank were to default on its obligation to pay principal and interest on any consolidated obligations, the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liability among one or more of the remaining FHLBanks on a pro ratapro-rata basis or on any other basis the Finance Agency may determine. In addition to possibly making payments due on consolidated obligations under our joint and several liability, we may voluntarily or involuntarily provide financial assistance to another FHLBank in order to resolve a condition of financial distress. Such assistance could negatively affect our financial condition, our results of operations and the value of membership in our Bank. Moreover, a Finance Agency regulation provides for an FHLBank System-wide annual minimum contribution to AHP of $100 million, and we could be liable for a pro ratapro-rata share of that amount (based on the FHLBanks' combined net earnings for the previous year), up to 100% of our net earnings for the previous year. Thus, our ability to pay dividends to our members or to redeem or repurchase capital stock could be affected by the financial condition of one or more of the other FHLBanks.

The Inability
29
Table of Contents


Market Risk

Changes to Identify Eligible Nominees for our Boardor Replacement of Directors and to Attract and Retain Key Personnelthe LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate Could Adversely Affect the Bank's OperationsOur Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

Under the Bank Act, at least 40%Many of our boardassets and liabilities are indexed to LIBOR. On July 27, 2017, the FCA, a regulator of directors' seats mustfinancial services firms and financial markets in the United Kingdom, announced that it will plan for a phase-out of regulatory oversight of LIBOR interest rate indices. In March 2021, the FCA further announced that LIBOR will either cease to be heldprovided by independent directors, who must meet certain specialized and narrow eligibility requirements (including citizenship, residency and expertise) but are subject to specific term limits, as described in Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance - Board of Directors. We currently have eight independent directors on our board. Two of the independent directors willany administrator or no longer be term-limited as ofrepresentative immediately after December 31, 2020,2021, or, in the case of some more frequently used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings, immediately after June 30, 2023. Although the FCA does not expect LIBOR to become unrepresentative before the applicable cessation date and two othersintends to consult on requiring the administrator of LIBOR to continue publishing LIBOR of certain currencies and tenors on a non-representative, synthetic basis for a period after the applicable cessation date, there is no assurance that LIBOR, of any particular currency or tenor, will continue to be term-limited as ofpublished or be representative through any particular date or that LIBOR will continue to be accepted or used by the markets generally or by any issuers, investors, or counterparties at any time, even if LIBOR continues to be available.

On September 27, 2019, the Finance Agency issued a supervisory letter to the FHLBanks ("Supervisory Letter") relating to their planning for the LIBOR phase-out. With respect to investments, the Supervisory Letter directed that, by December 31, 2021;2019, the FHLBanks stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. In addition, for all four have served as directors ofproduct types except investments, the Bank for 11FHLBanks should, by March 31, 2020, no longer enter into new financial assets, liabilities or more years. The Executive/Governance Committee of our board has established a subcommitteederivatives that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. Further, the Supervisory Letter directs that the FHLBanks update their pledged collateral certification reporting requirements by March 31, 2020 in an effort to assist the Committee and the board with respectencourage members to succession planning for directorships. distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral maturing past December 31, 2021.

As a result of the statutory limitations however,introduced by the Supervisory Letter, we have had to alter our hedging strategies and interest-rate risk management. Such activities may have a negative effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, we may be challengedexperience less flexibility in our abilityaccess to find prospective independent directors that meetfunding, higher funding costs, or lower overall demand or increased costs for advances, which in turn may negatively affect the eligibility requirements.future composition of our balance sheet, capital stock levels, primary mission assets ratios, and net income.

We rely on key personnel for many of our functions and have a relatively small workforce, given the size and complexity of our business. Our ability to attract and retain personnel with the required technical expertise and specialized skills is important for us to manage our business and conduct our operations. Such ability could be challenged as employment inIn the United States, improves.efforts to identify a set of alternative U.S. dollar reference interest rates include proposals by the Alternative Reference Rates Committee ("ARRC") of the Federal Reserve and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York. The ARRC has proposed the SOFR as its recommended alternative to U.S. dollar LIBOR. SOFR is based on a broad segment of the overnight Treasury repurchase market and is intended to be a measure of the cost of borrowing cash overnight collateralized by Treasury securities. The Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing a SOFR in the second quarter of 2018. In January 2019, we began participating in the issuance of SOFR-indexed CO bonds.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTSThe market transition away from LIBOR to SOFR is expected to be complicated, including the development of terms and credit adjustments to accommodate differences between LIBOR and SOFR. The introduction of an alternative rate also may introduce additional basis risk for market participants, as an alternative index is utilized along with LIBOR during a transition period. During the market transition, LIBOR may experience increased volatility or become less representative. In addition, the overnight Treasury repurchase market underlying SOFR may experience disruptions from time to time, which may result in unexpected fluctuations in SOFR.

None.In March 2021, the ICE Benchmark Administration announced it would delay the termination of the one-, three-, six-, and twelve-month U.S. Dollar LIBOR rates until June 30, 2023. This delay, and other delays, may tend to magnify the risks to the Bank and market participants for the LIBOR transition. Additionally, the delayed transition, coupled with the requirements of the Finance Agency's Supervisory Letter, could tend to increase our exposure to LIBOR-SOFR basis risk for the extended transition period.


30
Table of Contents


There can be no guarantee that SOFR will become widely used or that alternative rates will not cause additional complications. The infrastructure necessary to manage hedging utilizing SOFR continues to develop, and the transition in the markets and adjustments in our systems could be disruptive, with disruptions potentially beginning before the currently-planned phase-out of FCA support of LIBOR. A mechanism is not yet well-established to convert the credit risk and tenor features of LIBOR into any proposed replacement rate because markets which could facilitate such conversion are new and currently lack depth or liquidity. We may face additional risk if we are unable to replace the credit risk and tenor features in SOFR (or other replacement rates), or if we are unable to appropriately factor these components into the prices of our products, services, and investments. Moreover, there is no guarantee that, if the market is fully functioning at the time of the transition, the transition will be successful. Similarly, the transition from one reference rate to another could have accounting effects. For example, such transition could have an effect on our hedge effectiveness, which could affect our results of operations. Additionally, our risk management measuring, monitoring and valuation tools utilize LIBOR as a reference rate. Disruptions in the market for LIBOR and its regulatory framework, therefore, could have unanticipated effects on our risk management activities as well.

Given the large volume of LIBOR-based mortgages and financial instruments, and the size of our Agency MBS portfolio that utilizes a LIBOR-rate index, the basis adjustment to the replacement floating rate may have a significant impact on our financial results, but whether the net impact is positive or negative cannot yet be ascertained. We believe that other market participants, including our member institutions, derivatives clearing organizations, and other financial counterparties are also monitoring the LIBOR transition, but we cannot predict how such institutions will react to the transition, or what effects such reactions will have on us. We are not able to predict at this time whether SOFR or another alternative rate will become the sole market benchmark in place of LIBOR, whether the transitions to new reference rates will be successful, or what the impact of such a transition will be on the Bank's business, financial condition or results of operations.

Changes in Interest Rates or Changes in the Differences Between Short-Term Rates and Long-Term Rates Could Have an Adverse Effect on Our Earnings.

Our ability to prepare for changes in interest rates, or to hedge related exposures such as basis risk, significantly affects the success of our asset and liability management activities and our level of net interest income.

The effect of interest rate changes can be exacerbated by prepayment and extension risks, which are the risks that mortgage-based investments will be refinanced by borrowers in low interest-rate environments or will remain outstanding longer than expected at below-market yields when interest rates increase. Decreases in interest rates typically cause mortgage prepayments to increase, which may result in increased premium amortization expense and a decrease in the yield of our mortgage assets as we experience a return of principal that we must re-invest in a lower rate environment. While these prepayments would reduce the asset balance, our balance of consolidated obligations may remain outstanding. Conversely, increases in interest rates typically cause mortgage prepayments to decrease or mortgage cash flows to slow, possibly resulting in the debt funding the portfolio to mature and the replacement debt to be issued at a higher cost, thus reducing our interest spread.

A flattening or inverted yield curve, in which the difference between short-term interest rates and long-term interest rates is lower or negative, respectively, relative to prior market conditions, will tend to reduce, and has reduced, the net interest margin on new loans added to the MPP portfolio. Until such time as the yield curve becomes steeper, we may continue to earn lower spread income from that portfolio.

Although derivatives are used to mitigate market risk, they also introduce the potential for short-term earnings volatility, principally due to basis risk because we must use the OIS curve instead of the LIBOR curve as the discount rate to estimate the fair values of collateralized LIBOR-based derivatives while substantially all of the hedged items currently on the balance sheet are still valued using the LIBOR curve. Additionally, our U.S. Treasury liquidity portfolio is economically hedged with OIS interest rate swaps and may introduce income volatility due to non-symmetrical changes in U.S. Treasury rates and OIS swap rates.


31
Table of Contents


Liquidity Risk

The Inability to Access Capital Markets on Acceptable Terms Could Adversely Affect Our Liquidity, Operations, Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and the Value of Membership in Our Bank.

Our primary source of funds is the sale of consolidated obligations in the capital markets. Our ability to obtain funds through the sale of consolidated obligations depends in part on prevailing conditions in the capital markets, such as investor demand and liquidity, and on dealer commitment to inventory and support our debt. Severe financial and economic disruptions in the past, and the United States government's measures to mitigate their effects, including increased capital requirements on dealers' inventory and other regulatory changes affecting dealers, have changed the traditional bases on which market participants value GSE debt securities and consequently could affect our funding costs and practices, which could make it more difficult and more expensive to issue our debt. Any further disruption in the debt market could have an adverse impact on our interest spreads, opportunities to call and reissue existing debt or roll over maturing debt, or our ability to meet the Finance Agency's mandates on FHLBank liquidity.

Operational Risk

A Cybersecurity Event; Interruption in Our Information Systems; Unavailability of, or an Interruption of Service at, Our Main Office or Our Backup Facilities; or Failure of or an Interruption in Information Systems of Third-Party Vendors or Service Providers Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Risk Management, Financial Condition, Results of Operations, and Reputation.

Cybersecurity.

We rely heavily on our information systems and other technology to conduct and manage our business, which inherently involves large financial transactions with our members and other counterparties. Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of confidential and other information, both in our and third parties' computer systems and networks, including those of backup service providers. These computer systems, software and networks are vulnerable to breaches, unauthorized access, damage, misuse, computer viruses or other malicious code and other events that could potentially jeopardize the confidentiality of such information or otherwise cause interruptions or malfunctions in our operations, either directly or through a third party. We have not experienced a disruption in our information systems that has had a material adverse effect on us. However, as malicious threat tactics continue to become more pervasive and more sophisticated, and as regulatory scrutiny of cybersecurity risk management increases, we are required to implement more advanced mitigating controls, which increases our mitigation costs. Moreover, if we experience a significant cybersecurity event, either directly or through a third party, we may suffer significant financial or data loss, we may be unable to conduct and manage our business functions effectively, we may incur significant expenses in remediating such incidents, and we may suffer reputational harm. Any such occurrence could result in increased regulatory scrutiny of our operations. There can be no assurance that our, or any third parties' cybersecurity controls will timely detect or prevent all cybersecurity incidents. Although we carry cybersecurity insurance, its coverage may not be broad enough or adequate to cover losses we may incur if a significant cybersecurity event occurs.

Information Systems; Facilities; Unavailability or Interruption of Service.

In addition, our operations rely on the availability and functioning of our main office, our business resumption center and other facilities. If we experience a significant failure or interruption in our business continuity, disaster recovery or certain information systems, we may be unable to conduct and manage our business functions effectively, we may incur significant expenses in remediating such incidents, and we may suffer reputational harm. Moreover, any of these occurrences could result in increased regulatory scrutiny of our operations.

Office of Finance.

The Office of Finance is a joint office of the FHLBanks established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of consolidated obligations, among other things. A failure or interruption of the Office of Finance's services as a result of breaches, cyber attacks, or technological outages (either in the Office of Finance or certain of its third party service providers, including those of backup service providers) could constrain or otherwise negatively affect the business operations of the FHLBanks, including disruptions to each FHLBank's access to funding through the sale of consolidated obligations. Moreover, any operational failure of the Office of Finance or of its third party providers could expose us to the risk of loss of data or confidential information, or other harm, including reputational damage.

32
Table of Contents


Other Third Parties.

Despite our policies, procedures, controls and initiatives, some operational risks are beyond our control, and the failure of other parties to adequately address their performance standards and operational risks could adversely affect us. In addition to internal computer systems, we outsource certain communication and information systems and other services critical to our business infrastructure, and regulatory compliance to third-party vendors and service providers, including derivatives clearing organizations, loan servicers, and the Federal Reserve as to funds transfers.

Compromised security or operational errors at any third party with whom we conduct business, or at any third party's contractors, could expose us to cyber attacks, other breaches or service failures or interruptions. If one or more of these external parties were not able to perform their functions for a period of time, at an acceptable service level, or with increased volumes, our business operations could be constrained, disrupted, or otherwise negatively affected. In addition, any failure, interruption or breach in security of these systems, any disruption of service, or any external party's failure to perform its contractual obligations could result in failures or interruptions in our ability to conduct and manage our business effectively, including, without limitation, our advances, MPP, funding, hedging activities and regulatory compliance. There is no assurance that such failures or interruptions will not occur or, if they do occur, that they will be timely detected or adequately addressed by us or the third parties on which we rely. Any failure, interruption, or breach could significantly harm our customer relations and business operations, which could negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations, or ability to pay dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock.

We are implementing processes to accept electronically created and executed electronic notes – "e-notes" – in our business both as an approved collateral type, and as a class of mortgage note we purchase in our MPP. We anticipate initiating the use of e-notes during 2021. This includes developing mortgage note custody arrangements with a third-party "e-vault" format and use of a mortgage note "e-registry" for certain classes of e-notes, which will affect both our MPP processes and our collateral management processes. Using e-notes will create additional operations risk, particularly with respect to the safekeeping, storage and security of mortgage-related records by third parties, as well as potential differences across multiple jurisdictions regarding (i) the validity, enforceability and transferability of security interests in e-notes, (ii) the recording, transferability, and priority of associated security instruments, and (iii) execution requirements for e-notes and other associated instruments. Laws governing e-notes also vary depending on the class of transaction at the time of issue, with potentially different legal regimes for consumer mortgage notes, open-ended or revolving HELOCs, and non-consumer mortgage lending, such as in commercial real estate and multifamily secured lending. Different requirements for the use of e-notes in different markets (e.g., consumer mortgage, HELOC, and commercial) increase operational risk. In addition, there are uncertainties surrounding how any such assets will be treated or valued in their respective markets, if liquidated. We cannot predict our members’ appetites for using e-notes generally, or in any particular class of transaction. E-notes generally have not seen wide adoption, and we cannot predict market acceptance for e-notes for any asset types.

A Failure of the Business and Financial Models and Related Processes Used to Evaluate Various Financial Risks and Derive Certain Estimates in Our Financial Statements Could Produce Unreliable Projections or Valuations, which Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition, Results of Operations and Risk Management.

We are exposed to market, business and operational risk, in part due to the significant use of business and financial models when evaluating various financial risks and deriving certain estimates in our financial statements. Our business could be adversely affected if these models fail to produce reliable projections or valuations. These models, which rely on various inputs including, but not limited to, loan volumes and pricing, market conditions for our consolidated obligations, interest-rate spreads and prepayment speeds, implied volatility of options contracts, and cash flows on mortgage-related assets, require management to make critical judgments about the appropriate assumptions that are used in the determinations of such risks and estimates and may overstate or understate the value of certain financial instruments, future performance expectations, or our level of risk exposure. Our models could produce unreliable results for a number of reasons, including, but not limited to, invalid or incorrect assumptions underlying the models, the need for manual adjustments in response to rapid changes in economic conditions, incorrect coding of the models, incorrect data being used by the models or inappropriate application of a model to products or events outside the model's intended use. In particular, models can be less dependable when the economic environment is outside of historical experience, as has been the case in recent years.



33
Table of Contents


ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

We own an office building containing approximately 117,000 square feet of office and storage space at 8250 Woodfield Crossing Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN, ofof which we use approximately 105,900108,200 square feet. We lease or hold for lease to various tenants the remaining 11,1008,800 square feet. We also lease a secondary office space in Anderson, IN, which is used for business resumption activities in the event of a loss of or a disruption to the primary facility.

We also maintain two leased off-site backup facilities of approximately 11,900 square feet and 200 square feet, respectively,geographically dispersed, co-located data centers which are on electrical distribution grids that are separate from each other and from our office building.buildings. For more information, see ItemItem 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - OperationalOperational Risk Management.

In the opinion of management, our physical properties are suitable and adequate. All of our properties are insured to approximately replacement cost. In the event we were to need more space, our lease terms with tenants generally provide the ability to move tenants to comparable space at other locations at our cost for moving and outfitting any replacement space to meet our tenants' needs.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

In the ordinary course of business, we may from time to time become a party to lawsuits involving various business matters. We are unaware of any lawsuits presently pending which, individually or in the aggregate, could have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

34
Table of Contents


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

No Trading Market

Our Class B capital stock is not publicly traded, and there is no established market for such stock. Members may be required to purchase additional shares of Class B stock from time to time in order to meet minimum stock purchase requirements under our capital plan. Our Class B stock may be redeemed, at a par value of $100 per share, up to five years after we receive a written redemption request by a member, subject to regulatory limits and the satisfaction of any ongoing stock purchase requirements applicable to the member. We may repurchase shares held by members in excess of their required holdings at our discretion at any time in accordance with our capital plan.

Our Class B common stock is registered under the Exchange Act.Act and may be purchased, sold, redeemed and repurchased only at par. Because our shares of capital stock are "exempt securities" under the Securities Act, purchases and sales of stock by our members are not subject to registration under the Securities Act.

Depending on the class of capital stock, it may be redeemed either six months (Class A Common Stock) or five years (Class B Common Stock) after we receive a written request by a member, subject to regulatory limits and to the satisfaction of any ongoing stock investment requirements applying to the member under our capital plan. We may repurchase shares held by members in excess of their required holdings at our discretion at any time in accordance with our capital plan.
Capital Structure

Our capital plan was amended and restated effective September 26, 2020. The amended plan continues to provide for two sub-series of Class B capital stock: Class B-1 and Class B-2. Under the amended plan, Class B-1 stock is held by our members to satisfy their membership stock requirements, while Class B-2 stock is held to satisfy members’ activity-based stock requirements. Class B-1 stock is automatically reclassified as Class B-2 as needed to help fulfill the member’s activity-based stock requirement, and the member may be required to purchase additional Class B-2 stock in order to fully meet that requirement. Excess Class B-2 stock is automatically reclassified as Class B-1. The amended plan does not require that stock under redemption be converted or reclassified from one class to another. By contrast, under our prior capital plan in effect through September 25, 2020, Class B-1 was stock held by our members that was not subject to a redemption request, and Class B-2 stock consisted solely of required stock that was subject to a redemption request.

Under the amended capital plan, PFIs may opt in to an activity-based stock requirement in connection with their sales of mortgage loans to us under Advantage MPP. PFIs may elect this stock requirement each time they enter into an MDC with us based on the outstanding principal balance of loans purchased under the designated MDC. As of December 31, 2020, such Class B-2 stock issued and outstanding totaled $4.8 million.

The amended capital plan also permits the board of directors to authorize the issuance of Class A stock. Under the plan, Class A stock may be used at the member’s election, in lieu of Class B-2 stock, to satisfy the member’s activity-based stock requirement. Class A stock is subject to the same redemption requirements and limitations as Class B stock, except the applicable redemption period for Class A stock is six months. As of December 31, 2020, the board of directors had not authorized the issuance of Class A stock.

Number of Shareholders

As of February 29, 2020,28, 2021, we had 383371 shareholders and $2.3$2.4 billion par value of regulatory capital stock, which includes Class B common stock and MRCS issued and outstanding. As of February 28, 2021, we had no Class A stock outstanding.


35
Table of Contents


Dividends

A cooperative enterprise enjoys the benefits of an integrated customer/shareholder base; however, there are certain tensions inherent in our membership structure that are unusual and unique to the FHLBanks. Because only member institutions and certain former members can own shares of our capital stock and, by statute and regulation, stock can be issued and repurchased only at par, there is no open market for our stock and no opportunity for stock price appreciation. As a result, return on equity can be received only in the form of dividends. 

Dividends may, but are not required to, be paid on our Class B capital stock. Our board of directors may declare and pay dividends in either cash or capital stock or a combination thereof, subject to Finance Agency regulations. Under these regulations, stock dividends cannot be paid if our excess stock is greater than 1% of our total assets. At December 31, 2019,2020, our excess stock was 0.91%1.26% of our total assets.

31
Table of Contents


Our board of directors seeks to reward our members with a competitive, risk-adjusted return on their investment, particularly those who actively utilize our products.products and services. Our board of directors' decision to declare dividends is influenced by our financial condition, overall financial performance and retained earnings, as well as actual and anticipated developments in the overall economic and financial environment including the level of interest rates and conditions in the mortgage and credit markets. In addition, our board of directors considers several other factors, including our risk profile, regulatory requirements, our relationship with our members and the stability of our current capital stock position and membership.

Our amended capital plan provides for two sub-series of Class B capital stock: Class B-1 and Class B-2. Class B-1 is stock held by our memberseliminated the prior plan's requirement that is not subject to a redemption request, whiledividends on Class B-2 is required stock that is subject to a redemption request. Class B-1 shareholders receive a higher dividend than Class B-2 shareholders. The Class B-2 dividend is presently equal tobe calculated as 80% of the amount of thedividend rate on Class B-1 stock. Under the amended plan, the board of directors may declare a dividend and can only be changed by an amendment to our capital plan with approvalrate on Class B-2 stock that equals or exceeds the rate on Class B-1 stock. Similarly, the board of directors may declare a dividend rate on Class A stock that equals or exceeds the Finance Agency. rate on Class B-1 stock.

The amount of the dividend to be paid is based on the average number of shares of each sub-series held by a member during the dividend payment period (applicable quarter). For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1312 - Capital and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Capital Resources.

We are exempt from federal, state, and local taxation, except for employment and real estate taxes. Despite our tax-exempt status, any cash dividends paid by us to our members are taxable dividends to the members, and our members do not benefit from the exclusion for corporate dividends received. The preceding statement is for general information only; it is not tax advice. Members should consult their own tax advisors regarding particular federal, state, and local tax consequences of purchasing, holding, and disposing of our Class Bcapital stock, including the consequences of any proposed change in applicable law.


36
Table of Contents


We paid quarterly cash dividends as set forth in the following tabletables under our amended and prior capital plans ($ amounts in thousands).
Class B-1Class B-2
By Quarter PaidDividend on Capital StockInterest Expense on MRCSTotal
Annualized Dividend Rate (1)
Dividend on Capital StockInterest Expense on MRCSTotal
Annualized Dividend Rate (1)
2020
Quarter 1
$20,947  $2,906  $23,853  4.25 %$ $443  $446  3.40 %
2019
Quarter 4$22,960  $2,867  $25,827  4.75 %$ $858  $861  3.80 %
Quarter 328,336  1,521  29,857  5.50 % 141  144  4.40 %
Quarter 226,423  2,149  28,572  5.50 % 156  163  4.40 %
Quarter 126,480  2,153  28,633  5.50 % 150  154  4.40 %
2018
Quarter 4$21,470  $1,723  $23,193  4.50 %$ $125  $131  3.60 %
Quarter 321,115  1,842  22,957  4.50 % 159  163  3.60 %
Quarter 219,368  1,927  21,295  4.25 % 24  29  3.40 %
Quarter 1 (2)
11,481  1,014  12,495  2.50 % 20  26  2.00 %
Quarter 119,518  1,723  21,241  4.25 %10  34  44  3.40 %

Amended PlanClass B-1Class B-2
Quarter PaidDividend on Capital StockInterest Expense on MRCSTotal
Annualized Dividend Rate (1)
Dividend on Capital StockInterest Expense on MRCSTotal
Annualized Dividend Rate (1)
2021
Quarter 1
$3,946 $972 $4,918 1.75 %$10,012 $257 $10,269 3.00 %
2020
Quarter 4 (2)
$281 $73 $354 3.00 %$448 $13 $461 3.00 %


Prior PlanClass B-1Class B-2
Quarter PaidDividend on Capital StockInterest Expense on MRCSTotal
Annualized Dividend Rate (1)
Dividend on Capital StockInterest Expense on MRCSTotal
Annualized Dividend Rate (1)
2020
Quarter 4 (2)
$15,963 $1,822 $17,785 3.00 %$$166 $168 2.40 %
Quarter 318,822 2,439 21,261 3.50 %194 197 2.80 %
Quarter 219,944 2,947 22,891 4.00 %184 186 3.20 %
Quarter 120,947 2,906 23,853 4.25 %443 446 3.40 %

(1)    Reflects the annualized dividend rate on all of our average capital stock outstanding in Class B-1 and Class B-2, respectively, regardless of its classification for financial reporting purposes as either capital stock or MRCS. The prior capital plan required that dividends on Class B-2 dividend is paid atstock be calculated as 80% of the amountdividends declared on Class B-1 stock, while the amended capital plan permits the dividends on Class B-2 (activity-based) stock to be greater than or equal to the dividends on Class B-1 (non-activity-based) stock.
(2)    As a result of implementing the amended capital plan effective September 26, 2020, the Bank paid dividends under our prior plan for the period ended September 25, 2020 and under the amended plan for the remaining five-day period. Given the short period of time that the amended capital plan was in effect during the quarter, the board declared the same rate on the Class B-1 dividend.
(2) Reflects a supplemental cash dividend.stock as on the Class B-2 stock.



3237
Table of Contents


ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms. The following table should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and related notes and the discussion set forth in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. The table presents a summary of selected financial information derived from audited financial statements as of and for the years ended as indicated ($ amounts in millions).
As of and for the Years Ended December 31, As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
20192018201720162015 20202019201820172016
Statement of Condition:
Statement of Condition:
Statement of Condition:
AdvancesAdvances$32,480  $32,728  $34,055  $28,096  $26,909  Advances$31,347 $32,480 $32,728 $34,055 $28,096 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, netMortgage loans held for portfolio, net10,815  11,385  10,356  9,501  8,146  Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net8,516 10,815 11,385 10,356 9,501 
Cash and short-term investments
Cash and short-term investments
5,079  7,610  4,601  4,128  4,932  
Cash and short-term investments
5,627 5,079 7,610 4,601 4,128 
Investment securitiesInvestment securities18,718  13,378  13,027  11,880  10,415  Investment securities19,941 18,718 13,378 13,027 11,880 
Total assetsTotal assets67,511  65,412  62,349  53,907  50,608  Total assets65,925 67,511 65,412 62,349 53,907 
Discount notesDiscount notes17,677  20,895  20,358  16,802  19,251  Discount notes16,617 17,677 20,895 20,358 16,802 
CO bondsCO bonds44,715  40,266  37,896  33,467  27,862  CO bonds43,333 44,715 40,266 37,896 33,467 
Total consolidated obligationsTotal consolidated obligations62,392  61,161  58,254  50,269  47,113  Total consolidated obligations59,950 62,392 61,161 58,254 50,269 
MRCSMRCS323  169  164  170  14  MRCS251 323 169 164 170 
Capital stockCapital stock1,974  1,931  1,858  1,493  1,528  Capital stock2,208 1,974 1,931 1,858 1,493 
Retained earningsRetained earnings1,115  1,078  976  887  835  Retained earnings1,137 1,115 1,078 976 887 
AOCIAOCI68  42  112  56  23  AOCI105 68 42 112 56 
Total capitalTotal capital3,157  3,051  2,946  2,436  2,386  Total capital3,450 3,157 3,051 2,946 2,436 
Statement of Income:
Statement of Income:
Statement of Income:
Net interest incomeNet interest income$238  $288  $262  $198  $196  Net interest income$263 $238 $288 $262 $198 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses—  —  —  —  —  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— — — — — 
Other income (loss)Other income (loss)20  21  (6)  10  Other income (loss)(55)20 21 (6)
Other expensesOther expenses99  92  82  78  72  Other expenses109 99 92 82 78 
AHP assessmentsAHP assessments17  22  18  13  13  AHP assessments11 17 22 18 13 
Net incomeNet income$142  $195  $156  $113  $121  Net income$88 $142 $195 $156 $113 
Selected Financial Ratios:
Selected Financial Ratios:
 
Selected Financial Ratios:
 
Net interest margin (1)
Net interest margin (1)
0.35 %0.45 %0.45 %0.39 %0.44 %
Net interest margin (1)
0.38 %0.35 %0.45 %0.45 %0.39 %
Return on average equityReturn on average equity4.55 %6.43 %5.88 %4.92 %5.13 %Return on average equity2.67 %4.55 %6.43 %5.88 %4.92 %
Return on average assetsReturn on average assets0.21 %0.30 %0.26 %0.22 %0.27 %Return on average assets0.13 %0.21 %0.30 %0.26 %0.22 %
Weighted average dividend rate (2)
Weighted average dividend rate (2)
5.31 %5.00 %4.25 %4.25 %4.12 %
Weighted average dividend rate (2)
3.66 %5.31 %5.00 %4.25 %4.25 %
Dividend payout ratio (3)
Dividend payout ratio (3)
73.13 %47.87 %43.05 %53.87 %52.48 %
Dividend payout ratio (3)
86.97 %73.13 %47.87 %43.05 %53.87 %
Average equity to average assetsAverage equity to average assets4.71 %4.64 %4.72 %4.47 %4.46 %
Total capital ratio (4)
Total capital ratio (4)
4.68 %4.66 %4.72 %4.52 %4.71 %
Total capital ratio (4)
5.23 %4.68 %4.66 %4.72 %4.52 %
Total regulatory capital ratio (5)
Total regulatory capital ratio (5)
5.05 %4.86 %4.81 %4.73 %4.70 %
Total regulatory capital ratio (5)
5.45 %5.05 %4.86 %4.81 %4.73 %
Average equity to average assets4.64 %4.72 %4.47 %4.46 %5.23 %

(1)    Net interest income expressed as a percentage of average interest-earning assets.
(2)     Dividends paid in cash during the year divided by the average amount of Class B capital stock eligible for dividends    under our capital plan, excluding MRCS.
(3)    Dividends paid in cash during the year divided by net income for the year.
(4)    Capital stock plus retained earnings and AOCI expressed as a percentage of total assets.
(5)    Capital stock plus retained earnings and MRCS expressed as a percentage of total assets.

3338
Table of Contents


ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Presentation 

This discussion and analysis by management of the Bank's financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial Statements contained in this Form 10-K. Management's discussion and analysis of results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 is contained in the corresponding Item 7 in our 2018 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 8, 2019.

As used in this Item, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us," "our," and "Bank" refer to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis or its management. We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

Unless otherwise stated, amounts disclosed in this Item are rounded to the nearest million; therefore, dollar amounts of less than one million may not be reflected or, due to rounding, may not appear to agree to the amounts presented in thousands in the Financial Statements and related Notes to Financial StatementsStatements. Amounts used to calculate dollar and percentage changes are based on numbers in the thousands. Accordingly, calculationscalculations based upon the disclosed amounts (millions) may not produce the same results.

Executive Summary
 
Overview. As an FHLBank, we are a regional wholesale bank that serves as a financial intermediary between the capital markets and our members. The Bank is structured as a financial cooperative and thereforecooperative. Therefore, it is generally designed to expand and contract in asset size as the needs of our members and their communities change over time.change. We primarily make secured loans in the form of advances to our members and purchase whole mortgage loans from our members. Additionally, we purchase other investments and provide other financial services to our members. 

Our principal source of funding is the proceeds from the sale to the public of FHLBank debt instruments, called consolidated obligations, which are the joint and several obligation of all FHLBanks. We obtain additional funds from deposits, other borrowings, and the issuance ofby issuing capital stock to our members.

Our primary source of revenue is interest earned on advances, mortgage loans, and investments, including MBS.
 
Our net interest income is primarily determined by the spread between the interest rate earned on our assets and the interest rate paid on our share of the consolidated obligations. A substantial portion of net interest income is also derived from deploying our interest-free capital. We use funding and hedging strategies to manage the related interest-rate risk.

Due to our cooperative structure and wholesale nature, we typically earn a narrow interest spread. Accordingly, our net income is relatively low compared to our total assets and capital.

We group our products and services within two operating segments: traditional and mortgage loans.

For more background information on the Bank, see Item 1. Business.

Business Environment.
Economic Environment.
The Bank’sBank's financial performance is influenced by a number ofseveral key regional and national economic and market factors, including fiscal and monetary policies, the strength of the housing markets and the level and volatility of market interest rates, inflation or deflation, monetary policies, and the strength of housing markets.rates.

The U.S. economy grew at a relatively strong rate during 2019. Trade deal risks minimizedEconomy and Financial Markets. Due to the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, conditions in the financial markets deteriorated significantly in the first quarter of 2020. In response, the Federal Reserve delivered accommodative policy. During the fourth quarter, the U.S. Gross Domestic Product ("GDP") for the third quarter was revised upwardundertook a number of emergency actions in March 2020 to an annualized 2.1% from 1.9%help facilitate liquidity and support stability in the initial estimate. This compares to an increasefixed-income markets while volatility across global capital markets dramatically increased. Notably, the Federal Reserve substantially increased its provision of 2.0% in the second quarter of 2019. Accordingliquidity to the U.S. DepartmentTreasury and repurchase markets via open market operations while also providing liquidity to related markets, such as the commercial paper market, via an array of Commerce, GDP rosenew programs, as part of its commitment to using its full range of tools to support households, businesses, and the U.S. economy overall in this challenging time. Many of the third quarterFederal Reserve’s emergency lending facilities expired by December 31, 2020. In addition, as a result of increases in personal consumption expenditures, federal government spending, residential investment, exports,individuals and state and local government spending. However, growth in household spending and business spending were both a little lower, continuing a three-month trend.

businesses sought safety during the uncertain economic environment following the COVID-19 outbreak, depository institutions experienced extraordinary deposit growth.

3439
Table of Contents


The FOMC began cutting interest rates atBureau of Labor Statistics reported that the endU.S. unemployment rate in December 2020 was 6.7%, after declining from a high of July 2019, with a 25bps reduction14.8% in April 2020. Due to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the economy, the unemployment rate is expected to remain elevated. However, if COVID-19 vaccines are successfully administered in the Federal Funds rate. In SeptemberU.S. and October, the FOMC eased monetary policy again by cutting rates another 25bps during each meeting. At its meetingglobally, then business conditions may improve and unemployment could continue to decrease.

U.S. real gross domestic product ("GDP") increased at an annual rate of 4.0% in December 2019, the FOMC maintained the target range for the Federal Funds rate at 1.50% - 1.75%. The changes in yields on U.S Treasuries were mixed during the fourth quarter of 2019 relative2020, according to the prevailing yields atadvance estimate reported by the endBureau of Economic Analysis, compared to the revised annual rate of 33% in the third quarter of 2020. Changes in unemployment and GDP during 2020 were attributed largely to the effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on the U.S. economy, including the efforts to reopen businesses and resume activities that were postponed or restricted due to the pandemic. The effects of the pandemic, and governmental and public actions taken in response, on the global and U.S. economy continue to evolve, with lower ratesthe full duration and impact uncertain.

The COVID-19 pandemic hit Indiana at a time when its economy was already slowing. Moody’s Analytics forecast that the state’s 2019 pre-pandemic Gross State Product ("GSP") will not be reached until sometime in early 2022. Over the longer-term, Moody’s believes that slowing population growth and weaknesses in manufacturing will hold job growth back, causing Indiana to likely lag the rest of the country in economic growth. However, the most recent forecast from the Indiana University School of Business offers a glimmer of hope of stronger, positive economic growth in Indiana in the short endsecond half of 2021, setting up 2022 for positive economic growth.

The COVID-19 pandemic pushed Michigan’s weak economy into a recession. Moody’s forecasts that Michigan’s GSP will not recover to 2019 levels until late 2022. All together, Michigan faces an uphill battle to achieve pre-pandemic economic growth. Michigan's strained state and local government finances, a labor market reliant on the service sector, and a persistent out-migration trend present significant economic headwinds. However, the most recent forecast from the University of Michigan Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics expects positive job growth in every quarter from the second quarter of 2021 to the fourth quarter of 2022.

The Bank’s flexibility in utilizing various funding tools, in combination with its diverse investor base and its status as a GSE, has helped ensure reliable market access and demand for its consolidated obligations throughout fluctuating market environments.

Conditions in U.S. Housing Markets. The seasonally adjusted annual rate of U.S. home sales increased in 2020, compared to 2019, driven by low mortgage interest rates. However, low housing inventory levels and higher home prices in 2020 continued to constrain sales growth. In 2020, the impact of the curveCOVID-19 pandemic significantly affected the U.S. housing markets and higheris likely to result in further declines in home inventory and further increases in average home prices in the near term. Business closures and the resulting unemployment have caused many homeowners to seek relief from their mortgage payments. The federal government has enacted several financial relief programs to help offset declines in business and family incomes, and certain of these were extended to March 14, 2021 with passage by the U.S. Congress of another COVID-19 relief act. Delinquencies of mortgage loans have risen significantly and may continue to rise due to high unemployment and the expiration of the relief programs implemented in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

Interest Rate Levels and Volatility. The level and volatility of interest rates for maturities greater than 2 years.and credit spreads were affected by several factors during the year ended December 31, 2020, principally the COVID-19 pandemic and efforts in response by the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates and facilitate liquidity.

In the first quarter ofearly March 2020, the yield onFederal Reserve stated that the 10-year U.S. Treasury note, which is a benchmark for mortgage and other loan rates, reached a record low, further inverting the yield curve. At an emergency meeting on March 3, 2020, the FOMC cut the target range for the Federal Funds rate to 1.00% - 1.25% due to theCOVID-19 outbreak posed evolving risks to economic activity fromand, in an unscheduled meeting, decided to lower the coronavirus.federal funds target rate by 50 bps, to a target range of 1.00% to 1.25%, noting that it would closely monitor developments and their implications for the economic outlook and act as appropriate to support the economy. On March 15, 2020, the Federal Reserve again lowered the federal funds rate in an unscheduled meeting, to a target range of 0.0% to 0.25%, noting that the COVID-19 outbreak had harmed communities and disrupted economic activity in many countries, including the U.S., and had significantly affected global financial conditions. In the weeks before and after the Federal Reserve's March reductions in the federal funds target rate, interest rates decreased significantly, and have remained low.


40
Table of Contents


In late March 2020, the Federal Reserve stated that it would take further actions to support the flow of credit to households and businesses by addressing strains in the markets for Treasury securities and Agency MBS. In addition, the Federal Reserve stated that it will continue to purchase Treasury securities and Agency MBS in the amounts needed to support smooth market functioning and effective transmission of monetary policy to broader financial conditions. In its January 2021 meeting, the Federal Reserve stated that the path of the U.S. economy will depend significantly on the course of the COVID-19 pandemic, including progress on vaccinations, and that it is committed to using its full range of tools to support the U.S. economy in this challenging time. As a result, it voted to maintain the target range of the federal funds rate at 0.0% to 0.25%. The Federal Reserve also indicated that it will be appropriate to maintain this target range until labor market conditions have reached levels consistent with their assessments of maximum employment and inflation of at least two percent for some time.

The Federal Reserve is now reinvesting maturing investments held in its system open market account into a mix of Treasuriesfollowing table presents certain key interest rates for both the twelve-month averages for 2020 and Agency MBS. In September 2019 Chair Powell indicatedand the Federal Reserve will begin buying large amounts of Treasury Bills. To mitigate repurchase agreement market friction, the Federal Reserve is now holding an ongoing repurchase agreement operation and may begin a standing repurchase agreement facility in the near future.respective year ends.
Twelve-Month AverageDecember 31,
2020201920202019
Federal Funds Effective0.36 %2.16 %0.09 %1.55 %
SOFR0.36 %2.20 %0.07 %1.55 %
Overnight LIBOR0.37 %2.14 %0.08 %1.54 %
1-week OIS0.36 %2.14 %0.09 %1.55 %
3-month LIBOR0.65 %2.33 %0.24 %1.91 %
3-month U.S. Treasury yield0.35 %2.09 %0.07 %1.55 %
2-year U.S Treasury yield0.39 %1.97 %0.12 %1.57 %
10-year U.S. Treasury yield0.89 %2.14 %0.92 %1.92 %

The labor market continuestwelve-month averages of short- term interest rates were significantly lower during 2020, compared to 2019, impacting the Bank’s results of operations, primarily by decreasing both interest income and interest expense. In addition, at December 31, 2020, both short- and long-term interest rates were lower than at December 31, 2019, which affected the fair values of certain assets and liabilities. The prevailing expectation of prolonged low interest rates will likely continue to be very strong. January 2020 Non-Farm Payrolls showed strong gainsa significant factor driving the Bank’s results of 225 thousand relative to expectations of 165 thousand. The labor force participation rate improved to 63.4%. January labor market strength was attributed to warmer weather, which could have the effect of pulling gains forward from February or March.

As interest ratesoperations and unemployment remain low, housing sales, both new and existing, and the mortgage market, both new purchase and refinance mortgages, have remained strong according to the National Association of Realtors.

Economic growth for Indiana improved through the third quarter on an absolute basis and relative to the U.S. despite a slow start to the year. Indiana’s GDP grew at an annual rate of 2.3%, outpacing the national rate of 2.1%. The Indiana Center for Business and Economic Research and the Indiana Business Review both forecast continued economic growth in 2020, but expect significant deceleration at the state and national levels. Indiana’s economy is particularly susceptible to changes in the manufacturing sector. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, manufacturing as a share of total U.S. employment has been on a near-consistent decline over the past several decades. With very few exceptions, Indiana has been the front-runner in manufacturing as a percentage of employment and manufacturing output since the late 1990’s. As a result, economic growth is expected to continue, but at a rate lower than the national growth rate and below the current growth level.

The employment situation in Indiana remains strong. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, Indiana’s unemployment rate as of the end of December 2019 was 2.8%, or 3.3% on a seasonally adjusted basis. The 2.8% unadjusted rate compares well versus the unadjusted U.S. rate of 3.3%, down from 3.6% one year ago. Despite a favorable unemployment rate, the level of job growth in Indiana, both created and filled, has lagged the national levels.

Michigan’s GDP growth in 2019 of 2.5% was the highest rate among the Great Lakes states. The employment situation in Michigan remains solid and, compared to long-term averages, is quite strong. However, the 3.9% unemployment rate remains well above the 3.3% U.S. unemployment rate. This rate has declined each month since July 2019 when the unemployment rate was 4.3%. The UAW-GM strike negatively impacted employment and GDP in 2019.

Research Seminar in Quantitative Economics at the University of Michigan has forecast employment, payroll, and total income growth to continue through 2021, though at a declining rate each year.financial condition.

Impact on Operating Results. Market interest rates and trends affect yields and margins on earning assets, including advances, purchased mortgage loans, and our investment portfolio, which contribute to our overall profitability. Additionally, market interest rates drive mortgage origination and prepayment activity, which can lead to net interest margin volatility in our MPP and MBS portfolios. A flat or inverted yield curve, in which the difference between short-term interest rates and long-term interest rates is low, or negative, respectively, can have an unfavorable impact on our net interest margins. A steep yield curve, in which the difference between short-term and long-term interest rates is high, can have a favorable impact on our net interest margins. The level of interest rates also directly affects our earnings on assets funded by our interest-free capital.

Lending and investing activity by our member institutions is a key driver for our balance sheet and income growth. Such activity is a function of both prevailing interest rates and economic activity, including local economic factors, particularly relating to the housing and mortgage markets. Positive economic trends could drive interest rates higher, which could impair growth of the mortgage market. A less active mortgage market could affect demand for advances and activity levels in our Advantage MPP. However, borrowing patterns between our insurance company and depository members can differ during various economic and market conditions, thereby easing the potential magnitude of core business fluctuations during business cycles. Member demand for liquidity during stressed market conditions can lead to advances growth.

3541
Table of Contents


Results of Operations and Changes in Financial Condition
 
Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019. The following table presents the comparative highlights of our results of operations ($ amounts in millions).
Years Ended December 31,   Years Ended December 31,
Condensed Statements of Comprehensive IncomeCondensed Statements of Comprehensive Income20192018$ Change% ChangeCondensed Statements of Comprehensive Income20202019$ Change% Change
Net interest incomeNet interest income$238  $288  $(50) (18)%Net interest income$263 $238 $25 11 %
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses—  —  —  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— — — 
Net interest income after provision for credit lossesNet interest income after provision for credit losses238  288  (50) (18)%Net interest income after provision for credit losses263 238 25 11 %
Other income (loss)Other income (loss)20  21  (1) Other income (loss)(55)20 (75)
Other expensesOther expenses99  92   Other expenses109 99 10 
Income before assessmentsIncome before assessments159  217  (58) (27)%Income before assessments99 159 (60)(38)%
AHP assessmentsAHP assessments17  22  (5) AHP assessments11 17 (6)
Net incomeNet income142  195  (53) (27)%Net income88 142 (54)(38)%
Total other comprehensive income (loss)Total other comprehensive income (loss)25  (70) 95  Total other comprehensive income (loss)38 25 13 
Total comprehensive incomeTotal comprehensive income$167  $125  $42  34 %Total comprehensive income$126 $167 $(41)(25)%

The decrease in net income for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was primarilysubstantially due to the non-recurring net realized gain in 2018accelerated amortization of purchase premium resulting from higher prepayments on mortgage loans and lower earnings on the sale of allportion of the Bank's private-label RMBS, higher net losses resulting from derivatives and hedging activities, and narrower spreads onassets funded by its capital, each driven by the decline in market interest rates. Because of the Bank's interest-earningrelatively low net interest-rate spread, it has historically derived a substantial portion of its net interest income from deploying its interest-free capital in floating-rate assets, a portion of which is short-term. These decreases were partially offset by additional net gains on trading securities. In general, we holdinterest income resulting from the derivatives and associated hedged items to the maturity, call, or put date. As a result, we expect that nearly all of the net gains (losses) on these financial instruments will reverse over the remaining contractual terms of the hedged items.Bank's growth in average asset balances.

The increase in total OCI for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was primarily due to nethigher unrealized gains on our AFS securities in 2019, compared to net unrealized losses on our AFS securities in 2018 and the reversal of previously unrealized gains as a result of the recognition of the net gain on the sale of the private-label RMBS in other income.securities.

Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20182019 and 2017.2018. A comparison of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 20182019 and 20172018 is contained in the corresponding Item 7 in our 20182019 Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 8, 2019.10, 2020.
3642
Table of Contents


Changes in Financial Condition for the Year Ended December 31, 2019.2020. The following table presents the comparative highlights of our changes in financial condition ($ amounts in millions).

Condensed Statements of ConditionCondensed Statements of ConditionDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018$ Change% ChangeCondensed Statements of ConditionDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019$ Change% Change
AdvancesAdvances$32,480  $32,728  $(248) (1)%Advances$31,347 $32,480 $(1,133)(3)%
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, netMortgage loans held for portfolio, net10,815  11,385  (570) (5)%Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net8,516 10,815 (2,299)(21)%
Cash and short-term investments (1)
Cash and short-term investments (1)
5,079  7,610  (2,531) (33)%
Cash and short-term investments (1)
5,627 5,079 548 11 %
Investment securities and other assets (2)
Investment securities and other assets (2)
19,137  13,689  5,448  40 %
Investment securities and other assets (2)
20,435 19,137 1,298 %
Total assetsTotal assets$67,511  $65,412  $2,099  %Total assets$65,925 $67,511 $(1,586)(2)%
Consolidated obligationsConsolidated obligations$62,392  $61,161  $1,231  %Consolidated obligations$59,950 $62,392 $(2,442)(4)%
MRCSMRCS323  169  154  91 %MRCS251 323 (72)(22)%
Other liabilitiesOther liabilities1,639  1,031  608  59 %Other liabilities2,274 1,639 635 39 %
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities64,354  62,361  1,993  %Total liabilities62,475 64,354 (1,879)(3)%
Capital stockCapital stock1,974  1,931  43  %Capital stock2,208 1,974 234 12 %
Retained earnings (3)
Retained earnings (3)
1,115  1,078  37  %
Retained earnings (3)
1,137 1,115 22 %
AOCIAOCI68  42  26  62 %AOCI105 68 37 56 %
Total capitalTotal capital3,157  3,051  106  %Total capital3,450 3,157 293 %
Total liabilities and capitalTotal liabilities and capital$67,511  $65,412  $2,099  %Total liabilities and capital$65,925 $67,511 $(1,586)(2)%
Total regulatory capital (4)
Total regulatory capital (4)
$3,412  $3,178  $234  %
Total regulatory capital (4)
$3,596 $3,412 $184 %

(1)     Includes cash, interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold.
(2)     Includes trading, AFS and HTM securities.
(3)     Includes restricted retained earnings at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 of $251268 million and $222$251 million, respectively.
(4)     Total capital less AOCI plus MRCS.

The increasedecrease in total assets at December 31, 20192020 compared to December 31, 20182019 was substantially driven by additionsnet decreases in mortgage loans held for portfolio and advances outstanding to the Bank's liquidity portfolio, which includes trading securities.members, partially offset by a net increase in MBS issued by GSEs.

The increasedecrease in total liabilities was attributable to an increasea decrease in consolidated obligations to supportwhich reflected the net decrease in the Bank's growth intotal assets.

In addition to net income, the increase in total capital includes proceeds from the issuance of capital stock in connection with member advance activity, partially offset by shares reclassified to MRCS and dividends to members. The reclassification of shares to MRCS did not have a corresponding impact on regulatory capital because MRCS is included in regulatory capital.


43
Table of Contents


Outlook. WeThe COVID-19 pandemic has brought severe disruptions to the national economy and financial markets, However, we believe that our financial performance will continue to provide reasonable, risk-adjusted returns for our members across a wide range of business, financial, and economic environments.

AlternativeDuring 2020, advances balances expanded to address increased member demand for advances in the first half of the year, and contracted as demand for advances declined over the balance of the year. The high levels of liquidity injected by the Federal Reserve and held by our members as deposits accompanied by their low loan demand, alternative sources of wholesale funds available to our members, continued consolidation in the financial services industry involving our members, and run-off from captive insurance company advances have continuedgovernmental relief efforts continue to pressure overall advances levels. WeAs a result, we expect total advances outstanding to remain at or near their level at December 31, 2019.slightly decline in 2021.

In spite of the continuing strong demand by our members to participate in our Advantage MPP, we continue to limit our purchases of mortgage loans in order to prudently manage the associated market risk. As a result, we expect our mortgage loan balance outstanding to remain at or near its proportionslightly decline in 2021 in light of the still low, but recently increasing, level of longer-term mortgage rates and continuing Federal Reserve purchases of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac MBS, which encourage continuing refinancing activity by borrowers and MPP pricing disadvantages to us relative to those GSEs.

We expect to continue to maintain relatively high levels of liquidity to be able to timely support our total assets at December 31, 2019.members' needs in light of the ongoing uncertainties they face.

We continue to seek to maintain investments in MBS up to 300% of total regulatory capital. As a result, we expect to increase our Agency MBS holdings. Other long-term investments, such as Agency debentures, are likely to decline.


37
Table of Contents


Embedded mortgage prepayment options and basis risk exposure increase both our market risk and earnings volatility. Because market mortgage rates have fallen,remain low, higher levels of prepayment activity is expected tomay continue, to increase, barring a large increase in market interest rates. As a result, the amortization of purchased premiums on mortgage assets could continue to cause our earnings to decline.

Access to debt markets has been reliable, butwhile the cost of our consolidated obligations has increased.decreased. Going forward, the cost will continue to depend on several factors, including the direction and level of market interest rates, competition from other issuers of Agency debt, changes in the investment preferences of potential buyers of Agency debt securities, global demand, pricing in the interest-rate swap market, and other technical market factors. As LIBOR phases out, somea portion of our adjustable-rate funding is expected to be replaced by SOFR-indexed CO bonds. In 2019,bonds as we participatedplan to continue to participate in the issuance of SOFR-indexed CO bonds and we will continue to do so in 2020.2021.

Interest spreads have been mixed across asset categories on our balance sheet have declined in the past year. Although debt costs remain low relative to historic norms, we anticipateadvance spreads to continueare expected to compress further before leveling out.out while mortgage-related spreads are expected to widen. We will continue to engage in various hedging strategies and use derivatives to assist in mitigating the volatility of earnings and the MVE that arises from the maturity structure of our financial assets and liabilities. Although derivatives are used to mitigate market risk, they also introduce the potential for short-term earnings volatility, in part due to basis risk. We must use the OIS curve in place of the LIBOR rate curve as the discount rate to estimate the fair values of collateralized LIBOR-based interest-rate related derivatives while substantially all of the hedged items currently on our balance sheet are still valued using the LIBOR rate curve. Such volatility may be greater in 2020 with the ongoing purchases of U.S. Treasury securities swapped to OIS.2021.

WeIn light of our compressed interest margins, we continue to strive to keep our operating expense ratios relatively low while maintaining adequate systems, support, and staffing. We expect operating expenses to continue to increase beyond the rate of inflation as we continue to invest in technology to enhance our operating and risk management systems and member service capabilities. As a result, we expect operating expenses to slightly increase.

As a result of all of the foregoing factors, we have forecasted net income in 20202021 to be lower than net income in 2019.2020.

Our board of directors seeks to reward our members with a competitive, risk-adjusted return on their investment, particularly those who actively utilize our products.products and services. Our board of directors' decision to declare dividends is influenced by our financial condition, overall financial performance and retained earnings, as well as actual and anticipated developments in the overall economic and financial environment, including the level of interest rates and conditions in the mortgage and credit markets. In addition, our board of directors considers several other factors, including our risk profile, regulatory requirements, our relationship with our members, and the stability of our current capital stock position and membership.

The ultimate effects of the pandemic and the timing and shape of the economic recovery continue to evolve and are highly uncertain and therefore the future impact on our business is difficult to predict.


3844
Table of Contents


Analysis of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018.2019.

Net Interest Income. Net interest income, which is primarily the interest income on advances, mortgage loans held for portfolio, short-term investments, and investment securities less the interest expense on consolidated obligations and interest-bearing deposits, is our primary source of earnings. The following table presents average daily balances, interest income/expense, and average yieldsyields/cost of funds of our major categories of interest-earning assets and their funding sources ($ amounts in millions).
 Years Ended December 31,  
 201920182017
 
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense (1)
Average
Yield (1)
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield
Assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell$6,246  $141  2.26 %$5,938  $114  1.91 %$4,919  $50  1.02 %
Investment securities (2)
16,465  419  2.54 %13,038  350  2.69 %12,621  240  1.90 %
Advances (3)
31,969  813  2.54 %32,683  726  2.22 %31,209  406  1.30 %
Mortgage loans held for
portfolio (3)
11,252  358  3.17 %10,902  354  3.25 %9,922  315  3.17 %
Other assets (interest-earning) (4)
1,091  22  2.02 %1,151  21  1.83 %364   1.47 %
Total interest-earning assets67,023  1,753  2.62 %63,712  1,565  2.46 %59,035  1,016  1.72 %
Other assets (5)
179  440  444  
Total assets$67,202  $64,152  $59,479  
Liabilities and Capital:
Interest-bearing deposits$673  13  1.92 %$641  11  1.72 %$555   0.86 %
Discount notes19,392  440  2.27 %21,265  392  1.84 %20,116  182  0.91 %
CO bonds (3)
42,994  1,050  2.44 %38,518  866  2.25 %35,302  560  1.59 %
MRCS236  12  5.02 %168   4.99 %167   4.22 %
Other borrowings —  2.28 %—  —  — %—  —  — %
Total interest-bearing liabilities63,297  1,515  2.39 %60,592  1,277  2.11 %56,140  754  1.34 %
Other liabilities790  531  679  
Total capital3,115  3,029  2,660  
Total liabilities and capital$67,202  $64,152  $59,479  
Net interest income$238  $288  $262  
Net spread on interest-earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities0.23 %0.35 %0.38 %
Net interest margin (6)
0.35 %0.45 %0.45 %
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities1.06  1.05  1.05  

 Years Ended December 31,
 202020192018
 
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense (1)
Average
Yield/Cost of Funds (1)
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense (1)
Average
Yield/Cost of Funds (1)
Average
Balance
Interest
Income/
Expense
Average
Yield/Cost of Funds
Assets:
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell$5,716 $23 0.39 %$6,246 $141 2.26 %$5,938 $114 1.91 %
Investment securities (2)
19,984 265 1.32 %16,465 419 2.54 %13,038 350 2.69 %
Advances (3)
32,919 329 1.00 %31,969 813 2.54 %32,683 726 2.22 %
Mortgage loans held for
portfolio (3)(4)
9,927 231 2.33 %11,252 358 3.17 %10,902 354 3.25 %
Other assets (interest-earning) (5)
1,470 0.38 %1,091 22 2.02 %1,151 21 1.83 %
Total interest-earning assets70,016 853 1.22 %67,023 1,753 2.62 %63,712 1,565 2.46 %
Other assets (6)
(22)179 440 
Total assets$69,994 $67,202 $64,152 
Liabilities and Capital:
Interest-bearing deposits$1,384 0.21 %$673 13 1.92 %$641 11 1.72 %
Discount notes22,868 117 0.51 %19,392 440 2.27 %21,265 392 1.84 %
CO bonds (3)
41,105 462 1.12 %42,994 1,050 2.44 %38,518 866 2.25 %
MRCS290 2.96 %236 12 5.02 %168 4.99 %
Other borrowings— — — %— 2.28 %— — — %
Total interest-bearing liabilities65,647 590 0.90 %63,297 1,515 2.39 %60,592 1,277 2.11 %
Other liabilities1,052 790 531 
Total capital3,295 3,115 3,029 
Total liabilities and capital$69,994 $67,202 $64,152 
Net interest income$263 $238 $288 
Net spread on interest-earning assets less interest-bearing liabilities0.32 %0.23 %0.35 %
Net interest margin (7)
0.38 %0.35 %0.45 %
Average interest-earning assets to interest-bearing liabilities1.07 1.06 1.05 

(1)    In accordance with an amendment to accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019, hedging gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships are reported prospectively in net interest income instead of other income.
(2)    Consists of trading, AFS and HTM securities. The average balances of AFS securities are based on amortized cost; therefore, the resulting yields do not reflect changes in the estimated fair value that are a component of OCI. Interest income/expense includesand average yield/cost of funds include all other components of interest, including the effectsimpact of associated derivative transactions.net interest payments or receipts on derivatives in qualifying hedging relationships and amortization of hedge accounting basis adjustments. Excluded are net interest payments or receipts on derivatives in economic hedging relationships.
(3)    Interest income/expense and average yieldyield/cost of funds include all other components of interest, including the impact of net interest payments or receipts on derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships, amortization of hedge accounting basis adjustments, and prepayment fees on advances. Excluded are net interest payments or receipts on derivatives in economic hedging relationships.
(4)    Includes non-accrual loans.
45
Table of Contents


(5)    Consists of interest-bearing deposits and loans to other FHLBanks (if applicable). Includes the rights or obligations to cash collateral, except for variation margin payments characterized as daily settled contracts. The 2017 amounts also include grantor trust assets that are included in other assets in 2018 and 2019, as a result of adopting ASU 2016-01.
(5) (6)    Includes changes in the estimated fair value of AFS securities, grantor trust assets, in 2019 and 2018, and the effect of OTTI-related non-credit losses on AFS and HTM securities in 2018 and 2017.2018.
(6) (7)    Net interest income expressed as a percentage of the average balance of interest-earning assets. 
39
Table of Contents


Changes in both volume and interest rates determine changes in net interest income and net interest margin. Changes in interest income and interest expense that are not identifiable as either volume-related or rate-related, but are attributable to both volume and rate changes, have been allocated to the volume and rate categories based upon the proportion of the volume and rate changes. The following table presents the changes in interest income and interest expense by volume and rate ($ amounts in millions).
Year Ended December 31, Year Ended December 31,
2019 vs. 2018 2020 vs. 2019
ComponentsComponentsVolumeRateTotalComponentsVolumeRateTotal
Increase (decrease) in interest income:Increase (decrease) in interest income:   Increase (decrease) in interest income:   
Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resellFederal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell$ $21  $27  Federal funds sold and securities purchased under agreements to resell$(10)$(108)$(118)
Investment securitiesInvestment securities65   69  Investment securities67 (221)(154)
AdvancesAdvances(16) 103  87  Advances23 (507)(484)
Mortgage loans held for portfolioMortgage loans held for portfolio11  (7)  Mortgage loans held for portfolio(40)(87)(127)
Other assets (interest-earning)Other assets (interest-earning)(1)   Other assets (interest-earning)(22)(17)
TotalTotal65  123  188  Total45 (945)(900)
Increase (decrease) in interest expense:Increase (decrease) in interest expense:   Increase (decrease) in interest expense:   
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits   Interest-bearing deposits(18)(11)
Discount notesDiscount notes(37) 85  48  Discount notes67 (390)(323)
CO bondsCO bonds105  79  184  CO bonds(44)(544)(588)
MRCSMRCS —   MRCS(5)(3)
TotalTotal73  165  238  Total32 (957)(925)
Increase (decrease) in net interest income$(8) $(42) $(50) 
Increase in net interest incomeIncrease in net interest income$13 $12 $25 

The decreaseincrease in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was primarily due to a greateran increase in interest ratesincome on trading securities, in which the associated with interest-bearing liabilities than with interest-earningincrease in net interest settlements on derivatives is recorded in other income, and the Bank's growth in average asset balances. These increases were substantially offset by accelerated amortization of purchase premium resulting from higher prepayments on mortgage loans and lower earnings on the portion of the Bank's assets andfunded by interest-free capital, each driven by the decline in market interest rates. Net interest income included net hedging losses on qualifying fair-valueof $12 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to net hedging relationships. Beginning January 1, 2019, such gains (losses) are reported in net interest income. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.losses of $24 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.

Yields.Yields/Cost of Funds. The average yield on total interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, including the impact of net hedging losses, was 1.22%, 2.62%, an increase decrease of 16140 bps compared to 2018,2019, resulting primarily from increasesdecreases in market interest rates that led to higherlower yields on advances.all of our interest-earning assets. The average cost of funds of total interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, including the impact of net hedging losses,gains, was 2.39%0.90%, an a decreaseincrease of 28149 bps due to higherlower funding costs on consolidated obligations.all of our interest-bearing liabilities. The net effect was a decreasean increase in the net interest spread of 129 bps to 0.32% for the year ended December 31, 2020 from 0.23% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from 0.35% for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019.

AverageAverage Balances. The average balances outstandingoutstanding of interest-earning assets for the year ended December 31, 20192020 increased by 5%4% compared to 2018.2019. The average balance of investment securities increased by 26%21% due to purchases of tradingAFS securities to enhance liquidity and, to a lesser extent, purchases of AFS securities. In spite of higher aggregate principal prepayments,trading securities to enhance liquidity. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in the average amount of mortgage loans held for portfolio outstanding increased by 3%of 12% due to demand by our members for Advantage MPP. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in the average balance of advances of 2%, generally driven by a decline in member funding needs.higher aggregate principal prepayments. The increase in average interest-bearing liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, compared to 2018,2019, was due to an increase in average consolidated obligations of 4%discount notes outstanding to fund the increases in average interest-earning assets. The average balances of total interest-earning assets, net of interest-bearing liabilities, increased by 17%.
Provision for Credit Losses. In spite of the requirement to measure expected credit losses over the estimated life of our financial instruments under new accounting guidance effective January 1, 2020, the change in the provisions for (reversal of) credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to 2019 was insignificant. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.
Provision for Credit Losses. The change in the provision for (reversal of) credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to 2018 was insignificant.

4046
Table of Contents


Other Income. The following table presents a comparison of the components of other income ($ amounts in millions). 
 Years Ended December 31,  
Components20192018
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities$—  $32  
Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities—  —  
Net gains on trading securities (1)
33  —  
Net gains (losses) on derivatives hedging trading securities(12) —  
Net gains (losses) on all other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(7) (8) 
Net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness—  (5) 
Other  
Total other income (loss)$20  $21  

 Years Ended December 31,
Components20202019
Net realized gains (losses) on trading securities (1)
$23 $
Net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities (1)
(37)31 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives hedging trading securities(12)
Net gains (losses) on trading securities, net of associated derivatives(11)21 
Net interest settlements on derivatives(47)(10)
Net gains (losses) on all other derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(4)
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities— 
Change in fair value of investments indirectly funding our SERP
Other, net
Total other income (loss)$(55)$20 

(1)    Excludes gains (losses) onBefore impact of associated derivatives.

The decrease in total other income for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was due to the net realized gain in 2018losses on the saletrading securities, net of all of the Bank's private-label MBSassociated derivatives, and higher net lossesinterest settlements on the trading securities' economic hedging relationships, partially offset by net gainsrelationships. The generally offsetting interest income on trading securities and the prospective reporting of hedging gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationshipsis included in net interest income in 2019 instead of other income in 2018.income.

Net Gains (Losses) on Trading Securities. In January 2019, the Bank began purchasingWe purchase fixed-rate U.S. Treasury securities to enhance our liquidity. ThoseThese securities are classified as trading securities and are recorded at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in other income. Such changes include the impact of purchase discount (premium) recorded through mark-to-market gains (losses) on these securities. There are a number of factors that affect the fair value of these securities, including changes in interest rates, the passage of time, and volatility.volatility, which were magnified by the disruptions in the financial markets in 2020. These trading securities are being economically hedged, so that over time the gains (losses) on these securities will be generally offset by the change in fair value of the associated derivatives.

Net Gains (Losses) on Derivatives and Hedging Activities. Our net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities fluctuate due to volatility in the overall interest-rate environment as we hedge our asset or liability risk exposures. In general, we hold derivatives and associated hedged items to the maturity, call, or put date. Therefore, due to timing, nearly all of the cumulative net gains and losses for these financial instruments will generally reverse over the remaining contractual terms of the hedged item. However, there may be instances when we terminate these instruments prior to the maturity, call or put date. Terminating the financial instrument or hedging relationship may result in a realized gain or loss. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities.

The Bank uses interest-rate swaps to hedge the risk of changes in the fair value of certain of its advances, consolidated obligations and AFS securities due to changes in market interest rates. These hedging relationships are designated as fair-value hedges. Changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative and, to the extent these relationships qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the fair value of the hedged item that are attributable to the hedged risk are recorded in earnings. For qualifying fair-value hedging relationships, in prior periods, the differences between the change in the estimated fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk and the change in the estimated fair value of the associated interest-rate swaps, i.e., hedge ineffectiveness, were reported in other income. Beginning January 1, 2019, such differences are reported in net interest income. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

For the hedging relationships that qualified for hedge accounting, the differences between those changes in fair value (i.e. hedge ineffectiveness resulted in a net loss of $24 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which wasineffectiveness) are recorded in net interest income compared to aand resulted in net losshedging losses of $5$12 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, which was recorded in other income.2020, compared to net hedging losses of $24 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The losses for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 were primarily due to marginal mismatches in durations on, and the increase in volume of, swapped GSE MBS, particularly Fannie Mae Delegated Underwriting and Servicing (DUS) MBS.. As a result of issuing floating rate notesfloating-rate consolidated obligations to fund these MBS purchases instead of swapped fixed-rate notes,consolidated obligations, the funding and operational costs have been reduced but there is less offsetting hedge ineffectiveness, resulting in higher unrealized hedging gains or losses. However, to mitigate the volatility, during 2020 the Bank began implementing a new strategy of terminating interest-rate swaps associated with the MBS DUS and entering into short-cut hedging relationships with new interest-rate swaps.

To the extent those hedges did not qualify for hedge accounting, or ceased to qualify because they were determined to be ineffective,for hedge accounting, only the change in the fair value of the derivative was recorded in earnings with no offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item.


4147
Table of Contents


For derivatives not qualifying for hedge accounting (economic hedges), the net interest settlements and the changes in the estimated fair value of the derivatives are recorded in other income as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities. For economic hedges, the Bank recorded a net loss of $19 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, primarily related to trading securities, compared to a net loss of $8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

The table below presents the effect of derivatives and hedging activities that are reported in either net interest income or other income ($ amounts in millions).
Years Ended December 31,
Components20192018
Net changes in fair value (1)
$(24) $(5) 
Price alignment interest (2)
 (5) 
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on hedging relationships(5) (7) 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives hedging trading securities(12) —  
Other economic hedging gains (losses)  
Total gains (losses) from derivatives and hedging activities before net interest settlements(37) (12) 
Net interest settlements on derivatives (3)
51  18  
Total gains (losses) from derivatives and hedging activities$14  $ 

(1) Relates to derivatives and hedged items in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships.
(2) Relates to derivatives for which variation margin payments are characterized as daily settled contracts.
(3) Represents interest income/expense on all derivatives. Excludes interest income/expense on associated hedged items.

Other Expenses. The following table presents a comparison of the components of other expenses ($ amounts in millions).
Years Ended December 31,  
Components20192018
Compensation and benefits$55  $50  
Other operating expenses30  29  
Finance Agency and Office of Finance  
Other  
Total other expenses$99  $92  

Years Ended December 31,
Components20202019
Compensation and benefits$61 $55 
Other operating expenses32 30 
Finance Agency and Office of Finance10 
Other
Total other expenses$109 $99 

The increase in total other expenses for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was primarily due to increases in compensation, primarily driven by increased salaries and headcount, and post-retirement benefits, primarily due to the reduction in discount rates. The increase in other operating expenses is primarily due to various software-related expenses and various employee benefits.consulting and professional services engagements.

Office of Finance Expenses. The FHLBanks fund the costs of the Office of Finance as a joint office that facilitates issuing and servicing consolidated obligations, prepares the FHLBanks' combined quarterly and annual financial reports, and performs certain other functions. For each of the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, our assessments to fund the Office of Finance totaled $5 million.$5 million.

Finance Agency Expenses. Each FHLBank is assessed a portion of the operating costs of our regulator, the Finance Agency. We have no direct control over these costs. For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, our Finance Agency assessments totaled $45 million and $3$4 million, respectively.

AHP Assessments. The FHLBanks are required to set aside annually, in the aggregate, the greater of $100 million or 10% of their net earnings to fund the AHP. For purposes of the AHP calculation, net earnings is defined as income before assessments, plus interest expense related to MRCS, if applicable. For the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, our AHP expense was $17$11 million and $22$17 million, respectively. Our AHP expense fluctuates in accordance with our net earnings.

If we experienced a net loss during a quarter but still had net earnings for the year to date, our obligation to the AHP would be calculated based on our year-to-date net earnings. If we experienced a net loss for a full year, we would have no obligation to the AHP for the year, since our required annual contribution is limited to annual net earnings.

42
Table of Contents


If the FHLBanks' aggregate 10% contribution were less than $100 million, each FHLBank would be required to contribute an additional pro ratapro-rata amount. The proration would be based on the net earnings of each FHLBank in relation to the net earnings of all FHLBanks for the previous year, up to the Bank's annual net earnings. There was no shortfall in 20192020 or 2018.2019.

If we determine that our required AHP contributions are adversely affecting our financial stability, we may apply to the Finance Agency for a temporary suspension of our contributions. We did not make such an application in 2019 2020 or 2018.2019.

Total Other Comprehensive Income (Loss). Total OCI for the year ended December 31, 20192020 was $25$38 million compared to a loss for the year ended December 31, 2018 of $70 million. Total other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2019 of $25 million. Total OCI for both the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019consisted primarily of unrealized gains on AFS securities. Total other comprehensive loss forsecurities, particularly MBS. These amounts were primarily impacted by changes in interest rates, credit spreads and volatility, which were magnified by the year ended December 31, 2018 consisted primarilydisruptions in the financial markets during 2020. Partially offsetting the increases in OCI were actuarial losses under the Bank's SERP.
48
Table of unrealized losses on AFS securities and non-credit OTTI losses as a result of the recognition of the gain on the sale of our private-label RMBS in other income and the corresponding reversal of the unrealized gains previously recorded in OCI.Contents


Operating Segments
 
Our products and services are grouped within two operating segments: traditional and mortgage loans.
 
Traditional. The traditional segment consists of (i) credit products (including advances, standby letters of credit, and lines of credit), (ii) investments (including federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, interest-bearing demand deposit accounts, and investment securities), and (iii) correspondent services and deposits. The following table presents the financial performance of our traditional segment ($ amounts in millions).
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
TraditionalTraditional20192018Traditional20202019
Net interest incomeNet interest income$182  $221  Net interest income$254 $182 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses—  —  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— — 
Other income (loss)Other income (loss)20  22  Other income (loss)(52)20 
Other expensesOther expenses85  78  Other expenses93 85 
Income before assessmentsIncome before assessments117  165  Income before assessments109 117 
AHP assessmentsAHP assessments13  17  AHP assessments12 13 
Net incomeNet income$104  $148  Net income$97 $104 

The decrease in net income for the traditional segment for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was primarilysubstantially due to the non-recurring net realized gain in 2018lower earnings on the sale of allportion of the Bank's private-label RMBS, higher net losses resulting from derivatives and hedging activities, and narrower spreads onassets funded by its interest-free capital, driven by the Bank's interest-earning assets,decline in market interest rates, partially offset by additional net gains on trading securities. In general, we holdinterest income resulting from the derivatives and associated hedged items to the maturity, call, or put date. As a result, we expect to recover nearly all of the net losses on these financial instruments over the remaining contractual terms of the hedged items.Bank's growth in average asset balances.

Mortgage Loans. The mortgage loans segment includes (i) mortgage loans purchased from our members through our MPP and (ii) participating interests purchased in 2012 - 2014 from the FHLBank of Topeka in mortgage loans originated by certain of its PFIs under the MPF Program. The following table presents the financial performance of our mortgage loans segment ($ amounts in millions). 
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
Mortgage LoansMortgage Loans20192018Mortgage Loans20202019
Net interest incomeNet interest income$56  $67  Net interest income$$56 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses—  —  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— — 
Other income (loss)Other income (loss)—  (1) Other income (loss)(3)— 
Other expensesOther expenses14  14  Other expenses16 14 
Income before assessmentsIncome before assessments42  52  Income before assessments(10)42 
AHP assessmentsAHP assessments  AHP assessments(1)
Net incomeNet income$38  $47  Net income$(9)$38 

43
Table of Contents


The decrease in net income for the mortgage loans segment for the year ended December 31, 20192020 compared to 20182019 was due substantially to lower net interest income, due primarily to an increase inaccelerated amortization of purchase premium resulting from higher MPP loan prepayments and an increase inaccelerated amortization of concession fees resulting from called consolidated obligations.CO bonds. Such decreases were partially offset by reductions in funding costs, partially resulting from calls of higher-yielding CO bonds in 2019 and 2020.

49
Table of Contents


Analysis of Financial Condition
 
Total Assets. The table below presents the comparative highlights of our major asset categories ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Major Asset CategoriesCarrying Value% of TotalCarrying Value% of Total
Advances$32,480  48 %$32,728  50 %
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net10,815  16 %11,385  17 %
Cash and short-term investments5,079  %7,610  12 %
Trading securities5,017  %—  — %
Other investment securities13,701  20 %13,378  21 %
Other assets (1)
419  %311  — %
Total assets$67,511  100 %$65,412  100 %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Major Asset CategoriesCarrying Value% of TotalCarrying Value% of Total
Advances$31,347 48 %$32,480 48 %
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net8,516 13 %10,815 16 %
Cash and short-term investments5,627 %5,079 %
Trading securities5,095 %5,017 %
Other investment securities14,846 22 %13,701 20 %
Other assets (1)
494 — %419 %
Total assets$65,925 100 %$67,511 100 %

(1)    Includes accrued interest receivable, premises, software and equipment, derivative assets and other miscellaneous assets.

Total assets as of December 31, 20192020 were $67.5$65.9 billion, an increasea decrease of $2.1$1.6 billion, or 3%2%, compared to December 31, 2018,2019, primarily driven by additionsnet decreases in mortgage loans held for portfolio and advances outstanding to our liquidity portfolio. Such additions causedmembers, partially offset by a changenet increase in the mix of our total assets as the liquidity portfolio comprised 15% of total assets at December 31, 2019, compared to 12% at December 31, 2018.GSE MBS.

Under the Finance Agency's Prudential Management and Operations Standards, if our non-advance assets were to grow by more than 30% over the six calendar quarters preceding a Finance Agency determination that we have failed to meet any of these standards, the Finance Agency would be required to impose one or more sanctions on us, which could include, among others, a limit on asset growth, an increase in the level of retained earnings, and a prohibition on dividends or the redemption or repurchase of capital stoccapitak.l stock. Through the six-quarter period ended December 31, 2019,2020, our growth in non-advance assets did not exceed 30%.

Advances. In general, advances fluctuate in accordance with our members' funding needs, primarily determined by their deposit levels, mortgage pipelines, loan growth, investment opportunities, available collateral, other balance sheet strategies, and the cost of alternative funding options.

Advances at December 31, 2020 at carrying value totaled $32.5$31.3 billion, at December 31, 2019, a net decrease of $248 million,$1.1 billion, or 1%3%, compared to December 31, 2018.2019. However, the average daily balance of outstanding advances for the year ended December 31, 2020 totaled $32.9 billion, an increase of 3% compared to 2019.

The par value of advances to depository institutions - comprising commercial banks, savings institutions and credit unions - and insurance companies increased by 3% and decreased by 2%. Advances14%, respectively. The decrease was due to repayments by our captive insurance borrowers whose memberships terminated as required by February 19, 2021. Excluding those repayments, advances to non-captive insurance companies decreasedincreased by 1%2%. Advances to depository institutions, as a percent of total advances outstanding at par value, were 53%57% at December 31, 2019,2020, while advances to insurance companies were 47%43%.

4450
Table of Contents


The table below presents advances outstanding by type of financial institution ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Borrower TypePar Value% of TotalPar Value% of Total
Depository institutions:
Commercial banks and saving institutions$13,663  42 %$14,019  43 %
Credit unions2,798  %3,099  10 %
Former members - depositories540  %268  — %
Total depository institutions17,001  53 %17,386  53 %
Insurance companies:
Captive insurance companies (1)
2,724  %2,936  %
Other insurance companies12,541  39 %12,491  38 %
Former members - insurance — %16  — %
Total insurance companies15,271  47 %15,443  47 %
Total advances$32,272  100 %$32,829  100 %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Borrower TypePar Value% of TotalPar Value% of Total
Depository institutions:
Commercial banks and saving institutions$14,749 48 %$13,663 42 %
Credit unions2,548 %2,798 %
Former members - depositories268 %540 %
Total depository institutions17,565 57 %17,001 53 %
Insurance companies:
Captive insurance companies (1)
288 %2,724 %
Other insurance companies12,832 42 %12,541 39 %
Former members - insurance— %— %
Total insurance companies13,126 43 %15,271 47 %
CDFIs— — %— — %
Total advances$30,691 100 %$32,272 100 %

(1)     Membership must terminate no later thanby February 19, 2021. See certain restrictions on and maturities of advances in Notes to Financial Statements - Note 5 - Advances. These advances mature on various dates through 2024.

Our advance portfolio is well-diversified with advances to commercial banks and savings institutions, credit unions, and insurance companies. Borrowing patterns between our insurance company and depository members can differ during various economic and market conditions, thereby easing the potential magnitude of core business fluctuations during business cycles.

Our advance portfolio includes fixed- and variable-rate advances, as well as callable or prepayable and putable advances. Prepayable advances may be prepaid on specified dates without incurring repayment or termination fees. All other advances may only be prepaid by the borrower paying a fee that is sufficient to make us financially indifferent to the prepayment of the advance.


4551
Table of Contents


The following table presents the par value of advances outstanding by product type and redemption term, some of which contain call or put options ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Product Type and Redemption TermPar Value % of TotalPar Value % of Total
Fixed-rate:
Fixed-rate (1)
Due in 1 year or less$11,167  35 %$14,670  45 %
Due after 1 year7,479  23 %6,927  21 %
Total18,646  58 %21,597  66 %
Callable or prepayable
Due in 1 year or less—  — %10  — %
Due after 1 year34  — %39  — %
Total34  — %49  — %
Putable
Due in 1 year or less—  — %—  — %
Due after 1 year6,094  19 %3,103  10 %
Total6,094  19 %3,103  10 %
Other (2)
Due in 1 year or less50  — %133  — %
Due after 1 year175  %140  — %
Total225  %273  — %
Total fixed-rate24,999  78 %25,022  76 %
Variable-rate:
Variable-rate (1)
Due in 1 year or less442  %349  %
Due after 1 year—  — %—  — %
Total442  %349  %
Callable or prepayable
Due in 1 year or less133  — %435  %
Due after 1 year6,698  21 %7,023  22 %
Total6,831  21 %7,458  23 %
Total variable-rate7,273  22 %7,807  24 %
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts—  — %—  — %
Total advances$32,272  100 %$32,829  100 %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Product Type and Redemption TermPar Value % of TotalPar Value % of Total
Fixed-rate:
Fixed-rate (1)
Due in 1 year or less$10,023 33 %$11,167 35 %
Due after 1 year7,998 26 %7,479 23 %
Total18,021 59 %18,646 58 %
Callable or prepayable
Due in 1 year or less— — %— — %
Due after 1 year— %34 — %
Total— %34 — %
Putable
Due in 1 year or less— — %— — %
Due after 1 year7,252 24 %6,094 19 %
Total7,252 24 %6,094 19 %
Other (2)
Due in 1 year or less32 — %50 — %
Due after 1 year140 — %175 %
Total172 — %225 %
Total fixed-rate25,452 83 %24,999 78 %
Variable-rate:
Variable-rate (1)
Due in 1 year or less24 — %442 %
Due after 1 year— — %— — %
Total24 — %442 %
Callable or prepayable
Due in 1 year or less36 — %133 — %
Due after 1 year5,179 17 %6,698 21 %
Total5,215 17 %6,831 21 %
Total variable-rate5,239 17 %7,273 22 %
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts— — %— — %
Total advances$30,691 100 %$32,272 100 %

(1)    Includes advances without call or put options.
(2)    Includes hybrid, fixed-rate amortizing/mortgage matched advances.

Advances due in one year or less, decreased from 47%as a percentage of the total outstanding at par, at December 31, 2018 todecreased from 36% of the total outstanding, at par, at December 31, 2019 reflecting members' increased demandto 33% at December 31, 2020. for longer-term funding. See Notes to Financial Statements - Note 5 - Advances.

4652
Table of Contents


Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. We purchase mortgage loans from our members to support our housing mission, provide an additional source of liquidity to our members, diversify our assets, and generate additional earnings. In general, our volume of mortgage loans purchased is affected by several factors, including interest rates, competition, the general level of housing and refinancing activity in the United States, consumer product preferences, our balance sheet capacity and risk appetite, and regulatory considerations.

In 2010, we began offering Advantage MPP for new conventional MPP loans, which utilizes an enhanced fixed LRA account for credit enhancement consistent with Finance Agency regulations, instead of utilizing a spread LRA with coverage from SMI providers. The only substantive difference between our original MPP and Advantage MPP for conventional mortgage loans is the credit enhancement structure. Upon implementation of Advantage MPP, the original MPP was phased out and is no longer being used for acquisitions of new conventional loans. For more detailed information about the credit enhancement structures for our original MPP and Advantage MPP, see Item 1. Business - Operating Segments - Mortgage Loans.

In 2012 - 2014, we purchased participating interests from the FHLBank of Topeka in mortgage loans originated by certain of its PFIs through their participation in the MPF Program.

A breakdown of mortgage loans held for portfolio by primary product type is presented below ($ amounts in millions). 
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Product TypeUPB% of TotalUPB% of Total
MPP:
Conventional Advantage$9,526  90 %$9,874  89 %
Conventional Original561  %688  %
FHA276  %314  %
Total MPP10,363  98 %10,876  98 %
MPF Program:
Conventional176  %208  %
Government47  — %54  — %
Total MPF Program223  %262  %
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio$10,586  100 %$11,138  100 %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Product TypeUPB% of TotalUPB% of Total
MPP:
Conventional Advantage$7,529 90 %$9,526 90 %
Conventional Original417 %561 %
FHA218 %276 %
Total MPP8,164 98 %10,363 98 %
MPF Program:
Conventional123 %176 %
Government36 — %47 — %
Total MPF Program159 %223 %
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio$8,323 100 %$10,586 100 %

The decrease in the UPB of mortgage loans held for portfolio was due to repayments of outstanding MPP and MPF Program loans outstanding exceeding purchases under Advantage MPP. Over time, the aggregate outstanding balance ofBecause we no longer purchase mortgage loans purchased under our original MPP andor the MPF Program, the aggregate balance of loans purchased outstanding under those programs will continue to decrease.

We have establishedAs disclosed in the Notes to Financial Statements - Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance, we adopted ASU 2016-13, Measurement of Expected Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, beginning January, 1, 2020. As a result, we maintain an allowance for loancredit losses based on our best estimate of expected losses over the remaining life of each loan. Previously, our allowance was based on our best estimate of probable losses over thea loss emergence period which we have estimated to beof 24 months. Our estimate of MPP losses remaining after borrowers'borrower's equity, but before credit enhancements, was $10 million and $4 million at both December 31, 2020 and 2019, and December 31, 2018.respectively. After consideration of the portion recoverable under the associated credit enhancements, the resulting allowance for MPP loancredit losses was less thanthan $1 million at December 31, 2019 2020 and 2018.2019. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 7 - Allowance for Credit Losses and Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Credit Risk Management6 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio - MPP.


4753
Table of Contents


Consistent with other lenders in the mortgage loan industry, we developed a loan forbearance program for our MPP in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Under the forbearance program, our servicers can agree to reduce or suspend the borrower's monthly payments for a specified period. The forbearance may be granted up to 90 days from the date of the first reduced or suspended payment. Initially, written approval from us was required for longer periods. However, effective May 11, 2020, we issued additional guidelines to provide delegated authority to our servicers so they may extend forbearance periods and establish qualified forbearance resolution plans within our established parameters. In addition, we have authorized the suspension of foreclosure sales and evictions (with certain exceptions) through March 31, 2021 and, for borrowers under loss mitigation agreements related to the COVID-19 pandemic, the suspension of any negative credit reporting and the waiver of late fees.

In the second quarter of 2020, the UPB of our conventional mortgage loans in COVID-19-related informal forbearance programs peaked at $273 million and have since declined by 59% to $112 million at December 31, 2020. The UPB of loans in COVID-19-related formal forbearance programs at December 31, 2020 was $12 million.

Cash and Investments. We maintain our investment portfolio for liquidity purposes, to use balance sheet capacity and to supplement our earnings. The earnings on our investments bolster our capacity to meet our commitments to affordable housing and community investments and to cover operating expenses. The following table presents a comparison of the components of our cash and investments at carrying value ($ amounts in millions).
December 31,
Components201920182017
Cash and short-term investments:
Cash and due from banks$220  $101  $55  
Interest-bearing deposits809  1,211  660  
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,500  3,213  2,606  
Federal funds sold2,550  3,085  1,280  
Total cash and short-term investments5,079  7,610  4,601  
Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations5,017  —  —  
Total trading securities5,017  —  —  
Other investment securities:
AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debentures3,927  4,277  4,404  
GSE MBS4,558  3,427  2,507  
Private-label RMBS—  —  218  
Total AFS securities8,485  7,704  7,129  
HTM securities:  
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS3,060  3,469  3,299  
GSE MBS2,156  2,205  2,553  
Private-label RMBS and ABS—  —  46  
Total HTM securities5,216  5,674  5,898  
Total other investment securities18,718  13,378  13,027  
Total cash and investments, carrying value$23,797  $20,988  $17,628  

December 31,
Components202020192018
Cash and short-term investments:
Cash and due from banks$1,812 $220 $101 
Interest-bearing deposits100 809 1,211 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,500 1,500 3,213 
Federal funds sold1,215 2,550 3,085 
Total cash and short-term investments5,627 5,079 7,610 
Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations5,095 5,017 — 
Total trading securities5,095 5,017 — 
Other investment securities:
AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debentures3,503 3,927 4,277 
GSE MBS6,642 4,558 3,427 
Total AFS securities10,145 8,485 7,704 
HTM securities:  
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS2,623 3,060 3,469 
GSE MBS2,078 2,156 2,205 
Total HTM securities4,701 5,216 5,674 
Total investment securities19,941 18,718 13,378 
Total cash and investments, carrying value$25,568 $23,797 $20,988 

Cash and Short-Term Investments. The total outstanding balance and composition of our short-term investments are influenced by our liquidity needs, regulatory requirements, member advance activity, market conditions and the availability of short-term investments at attractive interest rates, relative to our cost of funds. For more information, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Liquidity.

Cash and short-term investments at December 31, 20192020 totaled $5.1$5.6 billion, a decreasean increase of 33% compared to$548 million, or 11%, from December 31, 2018.2019. Cash and short-term investments as a percent of total assets were 8% at December 31, 2020 and 2019 compared to 12% at December 31, 2018.totaled 9% and 8%, respectively.


54
Table of Contents


Trading Securities. In 2019, theThe Bank began purchasingpurchases U.S. Treasury securities as trading securities to enhance its liquidity in light of new liquidity guidance from the Finance Agency.liquidity. Such securities outstanding at December 31, 20192020 totaled $5.0 billion.

$5.1 billion, an increase of $78 million, or 2%, from December 31, 2019. As a result, the liquidity portfolio at December 31, 20192020 totaled $10.1$10.7 billion, an increase of $2.5 billion,$626 million, or 33%6%, from December 31, 2018. Additionally, the mix has changed, with U.S. Treasury securities representing 50%2019. Cash and short-term investments represented 52% of the liquidity portfolio at December 31, 2019.2020, while U.S. Treasury securities represented 48%.

Other Investment Securities. During the year ended December 31, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our private-label RMBS and ABS.

AFS securities at December 31, 20192020 totaled $8.5$10.1 billion, ana net increase of $781 million,$1.7 billion, or 10%20%, from December 31, 2018.2019. The increase resulted primarily from purchases of GSE MBS to maintain a ratio of MBS and ABS to total regulatory capital of up to 300%.

48
Table of Contents


Net unrealized gains on AFS securities at December 31, 20192020 totaled $90$137 million, a net increase of $37$47 million compared to December 31, 2018,2019, primarily due to changes in interest rates, credit spreads and volatility.

HTM securities at December 31, 20192020 totaled $5.2$4.7 billion, a net decrease of $457$515 million, or 8%10%, compared tofrom December 31, 2018. At2019. The decrease was due to repayments of HTM securities exceeding purchases during the year ended December 31, 2019, the estimated fair value of our HTM securities totaled $5.2 billion, of which $2.8 billion was in an unrealized loss position, an increase of 16% from $2.4 billion at December 31, 2018, primarily due to changes in interest rates, credit spreads and volatility. The associated unrealized losses increased from $16 million at December 31, 2018 to $17 million at December 31, 2019.2020.

Interest-Rate Payment Terms. Our investment securities are presented below by interest-rate payment terms ($ amounts in millions).    
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Interest-Rate Payment TermsInterest-Rate Payment TermsEstimated Fair Value% of TotalEstimated Fair Value% of TotalInterest-Rate Payment TermsEstimated Fair Value% of TotalEstimated Fair Value% of Total
Trading Securities:Trading Securities:Trading Securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations fixed-rateU.S. Treasury obligations fixed-rate$5,017  100 %$—  — %U.S. Treasury obligations fixed-rate$5,095 100 %$5,017 100 %
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities$5,017  100 %$—  — %Total trading securities$5,095 100 %$5,017 100 %
Amortized Cost% of TotalAmortized Cost% of TotalAmortized Cost% of TotalAmortized Cost% of Total
AFS Securities:AFS Securities:AFS Securities:
Total non-MBS fixed-rateTotal non-MBS fixed-rate$3,885  46 %$4,240  55 %Total non-MBS fixed-rate$3,463 35 %$3,885 46 %
Total MBS fixed-rateTotal MBS fixed-rate4,510  54 %3,411  45 %Total MBS fixed-rate6,545 65 %4,510 54 %
Total AFS securitiesTotal AFS securities$8,395  100 %$7,651  100 %Total AFS securities$10,008 100 %$8,395 100 %
HTM Securities:HTM Securities:HTM Securities:
MBS:MBS:  MBS:  
Fixed-rateFixed-rate$760  15 %$936  16 %Fixed-rate$283 %$760 15 %
Variable-rateVariable-rate4,456  85 %4,738  84 %Variable-rate4,418 94 %4,456 85 %
Total MBSTotal MBS5,216  100 %5,674  100 %Total MBS4,701 100 %5,216 100 %
Total HTM securitiesTotal HTM securities$5,216  100 %$5,674  100 %Total HTM securities$4,701 100 %$5,216 100 %
Total AFS and HTM securities:Total AFS and HTM securities:Total AFS and HTM securities:
Total fixed-rateTotal fixed-rate$9,155  67 %$8,587  64 %Total fixed-rate$10,291 70 %$9,155 67 %
Total variable-rateTotal variable-rate4,456  33 %4,738  36 %Total variable-rate4,418 30 %4,456 33 %
Total AFS and HTM securitiesTotal AFS and HTM securities$13,611  100 %$13,325  100 %Total AFS and HTM securities$14,709 100 %$13,611 100 %

The mix of fixed- vs. variable-rate AFS and HTM securities at December 31, 2019 was2020 changed slightly higher compared to December 31, 2018,2019, primarily due to purchases of fixed-rate MBS. However, all of the fixed-rate AFS securities are swapped to effectively create variable-rate securities, consistent with our balance sheet strategies to manage interest-rate risk.


55
Table of Contents


Issuer Concentration. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we held securities classified as trading, AFS and HTM from the following issuers with a carrying value greater than 10% of our total capital. The MBS issuers listed below include one or more trusts established as separate legal entities by the issuer. Therefore, the associated carrying and estimated fair values are not necessarily indicative of our exposure to that issuer ($ amounts in millions).

December 31, 2020
Name of IssuerCarrying ValueEstimated Fair Value
Non-MBS:
United States Department of the Treasury$5,095 $5,095 
Fannie Mae1,208 1,208 
Federal Farm Credit Banks1,849 1,849 
Freddie Mac256 256 
MBS:
Freddie Mac473 482 
Fannie Mae8,247 8,259 
Ginnie Mae2,623 2,625 
Subtotal issuer concentration19,751 19,774 
All other issuers190 190 
Total investment securities$19,941 $19,964 


49
56
Table of Contents


December 31, 2019
Name of IssuerCarrying ValueEstimated Fair Value
Non-MBS:
United States Department of the Treasury$5,017  $5,017  
Fannie Mae1,662  1,662  
Federal Farm Credit Banks1,830  1,830  
Freddie Mac254  254  
MBS:
Freddie Mac822  827  
Fannie Mae5,892  5,893  
Ginnie Mae3,060  3,053  
Subtotal issuer concentration18,537  18,536  
All other issuers181  181  
Total investment securities$18,718  $18,717  

Investments by Year of Redemption. The following table provides, by year of redemption, carrying values for short-term investments as well as carrying values and yields for trading, AFS and HTM securities as of December 31, 20192020 ($ amounts in millions).
Due afterDue afterDue afterDue after
Due inone yearfive yearsDue afterDue inone yearfive yearsDue after
one yearthroughthroughtenone yearthroughthroughten
InvestmentsInvestmentsor lessfive years ten yearsyearsTotalInvestmentsor lessfive years ten yearsyearsTotal
Short-term investments:Short-term investments:Short-term investments:
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits$809  $—  $—  $—  $809  Interest-bearing deposits$100 $— $— $— $100 
Securities purchased under agreements to resellSecurities purchased under agreements to resell1,500  —  —  —  1,500  Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,500 — — — 2,500 
Federal funds soldFederal funds sold2,550  —  —  —  2,550  Federal funds sold1,215 — — — 1,215 
Total short-term investmentsTotal short-term investments4,859  —  —  —  4,859  Total short-term investments3,815 — — — 3,815 
Trading Securities:Trading Securities:Trading Securities:
U.S. Treasury obligationsU.S. Treasury obligations4,167  850  —  —  5,017  U.S. Treasury obligations2,980 2,115 — — 5,095 
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities4,167  850  —  —  5,017  Total trading securities2,980 2,115 — — 5,095 
AFS Securities:AFS Securities:AFS Securities:
GSE and TVA debenturesGSE and TVA debentures571  1,743  1,515  98  3,927  GSE and TVA debentures705 1,225 1,573 — 3,503 
GSE MBS (1)
GSE MBS (1)
—  97  4,377  84  4,558  
GSE MBS (1)
— 284 6,206 152 6,642 
Total AFS securitiesTotal AFS securities571  1,840  5,892  182  8,485  Total AFS securities705 1,509 7,779 152 10,145 
HTM Securities:HTM Securities:HTM Securities:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS (1)
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS (1)
—  —  —  3,060  3,060  
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS (1)
— — — 2,623 2,623 
GSE MBS (1)
GSE MBS (1)
516  165   1,470  2,156  
GSE MBS (1)
14 68 290 1,706 2,078 
Total HTM securitiesTotal HTM securities516  165   4,530  5,216  Total HTM securities14 68 290 4,329 4,701 
Total investment securitiesTotal investment securities5,254  2,855  5,897  4,712  18,718  Total investment securities3,699 3,692 8,069 4,481 19,941 
Total investments, carrying valueTotal investments, carrying value$10,113  $2,855  $5,897  $4,712  $23,577  Total investments, carrying value$7,514 $3,692 $8,069 $4,481 $23,756 
Yield on trading securitiesYield on trading securities2.33 %1.64 %— %— %Yield on trading securities0.90 %0.15 %— %— %
Yield on AFS securitiesYield on AFS securities1.71 %1.89 %2.84 %2.70 %Yield on AFS securities1.46 %2.26 %2.60 %1.37 %
Yield on HTM securitiesYield on HTM securities3.67 %2.29 %2.66 %2.16 %Yield on HTM securities3.21 %0.72 %0.46 %1.13 %
Yield on total investment securitiesYield on total investment securities2.39 %1.84 %2.84 %2.18 %Yield on total investment securities1.01 %1.02 %2.52 %1.14 %

(1)    Year of redemption on our MBS is based on contractual maturity. Their actual maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.

50
Table of Contents


At December 31, 2019,2020, based on contractual maturities, investment securities due in one year or less were 28%19%, due after one year through five years were 15%19%, due after 5 years through 10 years were 32%40%, and due after 10 years were 25%22%.

For more information about our investments, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 4 - Investment SecuritiesInvestments. For more information on the credit quality of our investments, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - Investments.

Total Liabilities. Total liabilities at December 31, 20192020 were $64.4$62.5 billion, a net increasedecrease of $2.0$1.9 billion, or 3%, compared tofrom December 31, 2018,2019, substantially due to an increasea decrease in consolidated obligations.

Deposits (Liabilities). Total deposits at December 31, 20192020 were $960 million,$1.4 billion, a net increase of $460$415 million, or 92%43%, compared tofrom December 31, 2018.2019. These deposits represent a relatively small portion of our funding. The balances of these accounts can fluctuate from period to period and vary depending upon such factors as the attractiveness of our deposit pricing relative to the rates available on alternative money market instruments, members' preferences with respect to the maturity of their investments, and members' liquidity.


57
Table of Contents


The following table presents the average amount of, and the average rate paid on, each category of deposits that exceeds 10% of average total deposits ($ amounts in millions).
 Years Ended December 31,
Category of Deposit201920182017
Non-interest-bearing deposits:
Average balance$47  $57  $42  
Interest-bearing deposits - demand and overnight
Average balance656  465  504  
Average rate paid1.90 %1.64 %0.72 %

 Years Ended December 31,
Category of Deposit202020192018
Non-interest-bearing deposits:
Average balance$14 $47 $57 
Interest-bearing deposits - demand and overnight
Average balance$1,367 $656 $465 
Average rate paid0.20 %1.90 %1.64 %

We had no individual time deposits in amounts of $100 thousand or more at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019.
Consolidated Obligations. The overall balance of our consolidated obligations fluctuates in relation to our total assets and the availability of alternative sources of funds. The carrying value of consolidated obligations outstanding at December 31, 20192020 totaled $62.4$60.0 billion, a net increasedecrease of $1.2$2.4 billion, or 2%4%, from December 31, 2018.2019. This increase supporteddecrease reflected the Bank's growthdecrease in total assets.

The composition of our consolidated obligations can fluctuate significantly based on comparative changes in their cost levels, supply and demand conditions, demand for advances, and our overall balance sheet management strategy. Discount notes are issued to provide short-term funds, while CO bonds are generally issued to provide a longer-term mix of funding. Some CO bonds are issued with terms which permit us to repay them when more favorable funding opportunities emerge. During 2020, the Bank applied a variety of strategies to effectively manage the balance and structure of its consolidated obligations as market conditions and our asset levels changed.

The following table presents a breakdown by term of our consolidated obligations outstanding ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
By TermPar Value% of TotalPar Value% of Total
Consolidated obligations due in 1 year or less:
Discount notes$17,713  28 %$20,953  34 %
CO bonds23,405  38 %18,457  30 %
Total due in 1 year or less41,118  66 %39,410  64 %
Long-term CO bonds21,258  34 %21,918  36 %
Total consolidated obligations$62,376  100 %$61,328  100 %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
By TermPar Value% of TotalPar Value% of Total
Consolidated obligations due in 1 year or less:
Discount notes$16,620 28 %$17,713 28 %
CO bonds31,127 52 %23,405 38 %
Total due in 1 year or less47,747 80 %41,118 66 %
Long-term CO bonds12,119 20 %21,258 34 %
Total consolidated obligations$59,866 100 %$62,376 100 %

The percentage of consolidated obligations due in 1 year or less increased from 64% at December 31, 2018 to 66% at December 31, 2019 to 80% at December 31, 2020 as a result of seeking to maintain a sufficient liquidity and funding balance between our financial assets and financial liabilities.

Additionally, the FHLBanks work collectively to manage FHLB System-wide liquidity and funding and jointly monitor System-wide refinancing risk. In managing and monitoring the amounts of assets that require refunding, the FHLBanks may consider contractual maturities of the financial assets, as well as certain assumptions regarding expected cash flows (i.e., estimated prepayments and scheduled amortizations). For more detailed information regarding contractual maturities of certain of our financial assets and liabilities, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 4 - Investment SecuritiesInvestments, Note 5 - Advances, and Note 1110 - Consolidated Obligations.


51
58
Table of Contents


The table below presents certain information for each category of our short-term borrowings for which the average balance outstanding during each year2020, 2019 or 2018 exceeded 30% of capital at the respective year end ($ amounts in millions).

Discount Notes
CO Bonds With Original Maturities of One Year or Less
Short-term Borrowings201920182017201920182017
Outstanding at year end$17,677  $20,896  $20,358  $9,234  $8,001  $6,795  
Weighted average rate at year end1.59 %2.34 %1.22 %1.22 %2.38 %1.26 %
Daily average outstanding for the year$19,392  $21,265  $20,116  $9,683  $6,809  $6,315  
Weighted average rate for the year2.27 %1.84 %0.91 %1.90 %1.88 %0.91 %
Highest outstanding at any month end$24,124  $24,772  $22,413  $12,237  $8,001  $7,279  

CO Bonds With Original Maturities of One Year or Less
Short-term Borrowings202020192018
Outstanding at year end$17,842 $9,234 $8,001 
Weighted average rate at year end0.11 %1.22 %2.38 %
Daily average outstanding for the year$13,257 $9,683 $6,809 
Weighted average rate for the year0.39 %1.90 %1.88 %
Highest outstanding at any month end$19,141 $12,237 $8,001 

Derivatives. We classify interest-rate swaps as derivative assets or liabilities according to the net estimated fair value of the interest-rate swaps with each counterparty. As of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, we had derivative assets, net of collateral held or posted, including accrued interest, with estimated fair values of $208$283 million and $117$208 million, respectively, and derivative liabilities, net of collateral held or posted, including accrued interest, with estimated fair values of $3$23 million and $21$3 million, respectively. The estimated fair values are based on a wide range of factors, including current and projected levels of interest rates, credit spreads and volatility. Increases and decreases in the fair value of derivatives are primarily caused by changes in the derivatives' respective underlying interest-rate indices.

The volume of derivative hedges is often expressed in terms of notional amounts, which is the amount upon which interest payments are calculated. The following table presents the notional amounts by type of hedged item whether or not it is in a qualifying hedge relationship ($ amounts in millions).
Hedged ItemDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Advances$17,113  $13,980  
Investments13,917  8,562  
Mortgage loans991  1,038  
CO bonds17,031  14,239  
Discount notes1,350  —  
Total notional$50,402  $37,819  

The increase in the total notional amount during the year ended December 31, 2019 of $12.6 billion, or 33%, was primarily due to purchases of U.S. Treasury securities in economic hedging relationships.
Hedged ItemDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Advances$16,573 $17,113 
Investments15,035 13,917 
Mortgage loans361 991 
CO bonds17,473 17,031 
Discount notes950 1,350 
Total notional$50,392 $50,402 

The following table presents the cumulative impact of fair-value hedging basis adjustments on our statement of condition ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019AdvancesInvestmentsCO BondsTotal
Cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments on hedged items$207  $150  $(8) $349  
Estimated fair value of associated derivatives, net(200) (193)  (389) 
Net cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments$ $(43) $(4) $(40) 

Total Capital. Total capital at December 31, 2019 was $3.2 billion, a net increase of $106 million, or 3%, compared to December 31, 2018. In addition to net income, this increase includes proceeds from issuance of capital stock of $194 million, partially offset by shares reclassified to MRCS totaling $151 million and dividends to members totaling $104 million.
December 31, 2020AdvancesInvestmentsCO BondsTotal
Cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments on hedged items$646 $628 $(22)$1,252 
Estimated fair value of associated derivatives, net(642)(550)24 (1,168)
Net cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments$$78 $$84 


5259
Table of Contents


Total Capital. Total capital at December 31, 2020 was $3.5 billion, a net increase of $293 million, or 9%, from December 31, 2019, substantially due to proceeds from the issuance of capital stock in connection with member advance activity.

The following table presents a percentage breakdown of the components of GAAP capital.
ComponentsDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Capital stock63 %63 %
Retained earnings35 %36 %
AOCI%%
Total GAAP capital100 %100 %

ComponentsDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Capital stock64 %63 %
Retained earnings33 %35 %
AOCI%%
Total GAAP capital100 %100 %

The changes in the components of GAAP capital were relatively unchanged at December 31, 20192020 compared to December 31, 2018.2019 were substantially due to capital stock issued and outstanding in connection with member advance activity.

The following table presents a reconciliation of GAAP capital to regulatory capital ($ amounts in millions).
ReconciliationDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Total GAAP capital$3,157  $3,051  
Exclude: AOCI(68) (42) 
Add: MRCS323  169  
Total regulatory capital$3,412  $3,178  

The shares reclassified to MRCS did not have a corresponding impact on total regulatory capital.
ReconciliationDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Total GAAP capital$3,450 $3,157 
Exclude: AOCI(105)(68)
Add: MRCS251 323 
Total regulatory capital$3,596 $3,412 

Liquidity and Capital Resources
 
Liquidity. We manage our liquidity in order to be able to satisfy our members' needs for short- and long-term funds, repay maturing consolidated obligations, redeem or repurchase excess stock and meet other financial obligations. We are required to maintain liquidity in accordance with the Bank Act, certain Finance Agency regulations and related policies established by our management and board of directors.

Our primary sources of liquidity are holdings of liquid assets, comprised of cash, short-term investments, and trading securities, as well as the issuance of consolidated obligations.

Our cash and short-term investments at December 31, 20192020 totaled $5.1 billion.$5.6 billion. Our short-term investments generally consist of high-quality financial instruments, many of which mature overnight. Our trading securities at December 31, 20192020 totaled $5.0$5.1 billion and consisted solely of U.S. Treasury securities. As a result, our liquidity portfolio at December 31, 20192020 totaled $10.1$10.7 billion, or 15%17% of total assets.

Historically, our status as a GSE and favorable credit ratings have provided us with excellent access to capital markets. Our consolidated obligations are not obligations of, and they are not guaranteed by, the United States government, although they have historically received the same credit rating as the United States government bond credit rating. The rating has not been affected by rating actions taken with respect to individual FHLBanks. During the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, we maintained sufficient access to funding; our net proceeds from the issuance of consolidated obligations totaled $383.0 billion.$404.0 billion.

In addition, by statute, the United States Secretary of the Treasury may acquire our consolidated obligations up to an aggregate principal amount outstanding of $4.0 billion. This statutory authority may be exercised only if alternative means cannot be effectively employed to permit us to continue to supply reasonable amounts of funds to the mortgage market, and the ability to supply such funds is substantially impaired because of monetary stringency and a high level of interest rates. Any funds borrowed would be repaid at the earliest practicable date. As of this date, this authority has never been exercised.

However, to protect us against temporary disruptions in access to the debt markets, the Finance Agency currently requires us to: (i) maintain contingent liquidity sufficient to cover, at a minimum, 10 calendar days of inability to issue consolidated obligations; (ii) have available at all times an amount greater than or equal to our members' current deposits invested in specific assets; (iii) maintain, in the aggregate, unpledged qualifying assets in an amount at least equal to our participation in total consolidated obligations outstanding; and (iv) maintain, through short-term investments, an amount at least equal to our anticipated cash outflows under hypothetical adverse scenarios.


5360
Table of Contents


In 2018, the Finance Agency issued an Advisory Bulletin on FHLBank liquidity2018-07 that communicates the Finance Agency's expectations with respect to the maintenance of sufficient liquidity. The Bank has fully implemented such liquidity guidance on a timely basis. After December 31, 2019, the standard increased from 10 to 20 calendar days of liquidity sufficient to cover ana temporary inability to issue consolidated obligations. Our liquidity exceeded the 20-day standard at December 31, 2019. AsIn March 2020, as a result of recenta change in market conditions, however, the Finance Agency has indicated that the FHLBanks maycould revert to 10 days of liquidity through April 30, 2020. In May 2020, but should planhowever, as a result of continuing market conditions, the Finance Agency indicated that an FHLBank would be considered to return tohave adequate reserves of liquid assets if, by August 31, 2020, it maintains 15 days of positive liquidity and, by December 31, 2020, it maintains 20 days of liquidity by September 30, 2020.positive liquidity. We anticipate our liquidity will continue to meet or exceed the Finance Agency's standards going forward.

To support deposits, the Bank Act requires us to have at all times a liquidity deposit reserve in an amount equal to the current deposits received from our members invested in (i) obligations of the United States, (ii) deposits in eligible banks or trust companies, or (iii) advances with a maturity not exceeding five years. The following table presents our excess liquidity deposit reserves ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Liquidity deposit reservesLiquidity deposit reserves$35,218  $33,109  Liquidity deposit reserves$33,574 $35,218 
Less: total depositsLess: total deposits960  500  Less: total deposits1,375 960 
Excess liquidity deposit reservesExcess liquidity deposit reserves$34,258  $32,609  Excess liquidity deposit reserves$32,199 $34,258 

We must maintain assets that are free from any lien or pledge in an amount at least equal to the amount of our consolidated obligations outstanding from among the following types of qualifying assets:

cash;
obligations of, or fully guaranteed by, the United States;
advances;
mortgages that have any guaranty, insurance, or commitment from the United States or any agency of the United States; and
investments described in Section 16(a) of the Bank Act, which include, among others, securities that a fiduciary or trustee may purchase under the laws of the state in which the FHLBank is located.

The following table presents the aggregate amount of our qualifying assets to the total amount of our consolidated obligations outstanding ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Aggregate qualifying assetsAggregate qualifying assets$67,170  $65,158  Aggregate qualifying assets$65,532 $67,170 
Less: total consolidated obligations outstandingLess: total consolidated obligations outstanding62,392  61,161  Less: total consolidated obligations outstanding59,950 62,392 
Aggregate qualifying assets in excess of consolidated obligationsAggregate qualifying assets in excess of consolidated obligations$4,778  $3,997  Aggregate qualifying assets in excess of consolidated obligations$5,582 $4,778 
Ratio of aggregate qualifying assets to consolidated obligationsRatio of aggregate qualifying assets to consolidated obligations1.08  1.07  Ratio of aggregate qualifying assets to consolidated obligations1.09 1.08 

We also maintain a contingency liquidity plan designed to enable us to meet our obligations and the liquidity needs of our members in the event of short-term capital market disruptions, or operational disruptions at our Bank and/or the Office of Finance.

New or amendedrevised regulatory guidance from the Finance Agency could continue to increase the amount and change the characteristics of liquidity that we are required to maintain. We have not identified any other trends, demands, commitments, or events that are likely to materially increase or decrease our liquidity.

Changes in Cash Flow. The cash flows from our assets and liabilities support our mission to provide our members with competitively priced funding, a reasonable return on their investment in our capital stock, and support for community investmentinvestment activities. The balances of our assets and liabilities can vary significantly in the normal course of business due to the amount and timing of cash flows, which are affected by member-driven activities and market conditions. Net cash provided by (used in)used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 20192020 was $(129)$318 million, compared to net cash provided byused in operating activities of $353$129 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2019. The decreasenet increase in cash used of $189 million was substantially due to the fluctuation in variation margin payments on cleared derivatives. Such payments are treated by the clearinghouses as daily settled contracts.

5461
Table of Contents


Capital Resources.

Total Regulatory Capital. The following table provides a breakdown of our outstanding capital stock and MRCS ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
By Type of Member InstitutionBy Type of Member InstitutionAmount% of TotalAmount% of TotalBy Type of Member InstitutionAmount% of TotalAmount% of Total
Capital Stock:Capital Stock:Capital Stock:
Depository institutions:Depository institutions:Depository institutions:
Commercial banks and savings institutionsCommercial banks and savings institutions$955  42 %$985  47 %Commercial banks and savings institutions$1,108 45 %$955 42 %
Credit unionsCredit unions277  12 %263  12 %Credit unions298 12 %277 12 %
Total depository institutionsTotal depository institutions1,232  54 %1,248  59 %Total depository institutions1,406 57 %1,232 54 %
Insurance companiesInsurance companies742  32 %683  33 %Insurance companies802 33 %742 32 %
CDFIsCDFIs—  — %—  — %CDFIs— — %— — %
Total capital stock, putable at par valueTotal capital stock, putable at par value1,974  86 %1,931  92 %Total capital stock, putable at par value2,208 90 %1,974 86 %
MRCS:MRCS:MRCS:
Captive insurance companiesCaptive insurance companies136  %132  %Captive insurance companies31 %136 %
Former members (1)
Former members (1)
187  %37  %
Former members (1)
220 %187 %
Total MRCSTotal MRCS323  14 %169  %Total MRCS251 10 %323 14 %
Total regulatory capital stockTotal regulatory capital stock$2,297  100 %$2,100  100 %Total regulatory capital stock$2,459 100 %$2,297 100 %

(1)    Balances include $1 million at both December 31, 2020 and 2019 and 2018 include less than $1 million of MRCS that had reached the end of the five-year redemption period but will not be redeemed until the associated credit products and other obligations are no longer outstanding.

OurOn August 26, 2020, our board of directors approved the involuntary termination of a captive insurance company member that had repaid all of its outstanding advances and directed the repurchase of all of that member's Class B stock totaling $18.3 million. This stock was repurchased on August 28, 2020. On February 19, 2021, the Bank terminated the memberships of its two remaining captive insurance company members that do not meet the regulatory definitionand repurchased their excess stock of "insurance company" or fall within another category$18.1 million.

We amended and restated our capital plan effective September 26, 2020. For more information, see Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of institution that is eligible for FHLBank membership under the Final Membership Rule shall have their memberships terminated no later than February 19, 2021. Upon termination, all of their outstanding Class B capital stock will be repurchased or redeemed in accordance with the Final Membership Rule.Equity Securities.

Excess Capital Stock. Capital stock that is not required as a condition of membership or to support outstanding obligations of members or former members to us is considered excess capital stock.stock under our capital plan. In general, the level of excess capital stock fluctuates with our members' level of advances.advances and, to the extent members have opted-in to AMA activity-based stock requirements, principal amounts of MDCs.

The following table presents the composition of our excess capital stock ($ amounts in millions).
ComponentsDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Member capital stock not subject to outstanding redemption requests$441  $450  
Member capital stock subject to outstanding redemption requests  
MRCS175  25  
Total excess capital stock$617  $476  
Excess stock as a percentage of regulatory capital stock27 %23 %

ComponentsDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Member capital stock not subject to outstanding redemption requests$605 $441 
Member capital stock subject to outstanding redemption requests— 
MRCS225 175 
Total excess capital stock$830 $617 
Excess stock as a percentage of regulatory capital stock34 %27 %

The increase in excess stock during the year ended December 31, 20192020 resulted primarily from member merger activity.significant changes in advance activity during 2020 and, to a lesser extent, mergers involving our members.


62
Table of Contents


Finance Agency rules limit the ability of an FHLBank to pay dividends in the form of additional shares of capital stock or otherwise issue excess stock under certain circumstances, including when its total excess stock exceeds 1% of total assets or if the issuance of excess stock would cause total excess stock to exceed 1% of total assets. Our excess stock at December 31, 2019 2020 was 0.91%1.26% of our total assets. Therefore, subject toas a result of these regulatory limitations, we are currently not permitted to distribute stock dividends or issue new excess stock to our members, and distribute stock dividends, should we choose to do so.

55
TableUnder the amended capital plan, the Bank is required to repurchase excess stock if its regulatory capital ratio as of Contents


Under ourthe last day of any month exceeds a specific ratio established by the board of directors from time to time, currently 5.75%, by at least 25 bps. As a result, the current threshold for repurchase is a regulatory capital plan,ratio of 6.0%. Our regulatory capital ratio at December 31, 2020 was 5.45%. Excess stock shall be repurchased under these circumstances only to the extent required to reduce the Bank's regulatory capital ratio to the specific ratio which was initially used to calculate the repurchase obligation. Otherwise, we are not required to redeem excess stock from a member until five years (or, in the case of Class A stock, six months) after the earliest of (i) termination of the membership, (ii) our receipt of notice of voluntary withdrawal from membership, or (iii) the member's request for redemption of its excess stock. At our discretion, we may also voluntarily repurchase, and have repurchased from time to time, excess stock without a member request, upon approval of our board of directors and with 15 days' notice to the member in accordance with our capital plan.

Statutory and Regulatory Restrictions on Capital Stock Redemption. In accordance with the Bank Act, each class of FHLBank stock is considered putable by the member. However, there are significant statutory and regulatory restrictions on our obligation to redeem, or right to repurchase, the outstanding stock, including the following:

We may not redeem or repurchase any capital stock if, following such action, we would fail to satisfy any of our minimum capital requirements. By law, no capital stock may be redeemed or repurchased at any time at which we are undercapitalized.
We may not redeem or repurchase any capital stock without approval of the Finance Agency if either our board of directors or the Finance Agency determines that we have incurred, or are likely to incur, losses resulting, or expected to result, in a charge against capital while such charges are continuing or expected to continue.

Additionally, we may not redeem or repurchase shares of capital stock from any member if (i) the principal or interest due on any consolidated obligation has not been paid in full when due; (ii) we fail to certify in writing to the Finance Agency that we will remain in compliance with our liquidity requirements and will remain capable of making full and timely payment of all of our current obligations; (iii) we notify the Finance Agency that we cannot provide the foregoing certification, project that we will fail to comply with statutory or regulatory liquidity requirements or will be unable to timely and fully meet all of our obligations; (iv) we actually fail to comply with statutory or regulatory liquidity requirements or to timely and fully meet all of our current obligations; or (v) we enter or negotiate to enter into an agreement with one or more FHLBanks to obtain financial assistance to meet our current obligations.

If, during the period between receipt of a stock redemption notification from a member and the actual redemption (which may last indefinitely if any of the restrictions on capital stock redemption discussed above have occurred), the Bank is liquidated, merged involuntarily, or merges upon our board of directors' approval or consent with one or more other FHLBanks, the consideration for the stock or the redemption value of the stock will be established after the settlement of all senior claims. Generally, no claims would be subordinated to the rights of our shareholders.

Our capital plan permits us, at our discretion, to retain the proceeds of redeemed or repurchased stock if we determine that there is an existing or anticipated collateral deficiency related to a member'sany obligations of the member to us until the member delivers other collateral to us, such obligations have been satisfied or the anticipated collateral deficiency is otherwise resolved to our satisfaction.

If the Bank were to be liquidated, after payment in full to our creditors, our shareholders would be entitled to receive the par value of their capital stock as well as retained earnings, if any, in an amount proportional to the shareholder's allocation of total shares of capital stock at the time of liquidation. In the event of a merger or consolidation, our board of directors must determine the rights and preferences of our shareholders, subject to any terms and conditions imposed by the Finance Agency.


63
Table of Contents


Capital Distributions. Our board of directors seeks to reward our members with a competitive, risk-adjusted return on their investment, particularly those who actively utilize our products and services. Our board of directors' decision to declare dividends is influenced by our financial condition, overall financial performance and retained earnings, as well as actual and anticipated developments in the overall economic and financial environment including the level of interest rates and conditions in the mortgage and credit markets. In addition, our board of directors considers several other factors, including our risk profile, regulatory requirements, our relationship with our members and the stability of our current capital stock position and membership.

We may, but are not required to, pay dividends on our capital stock. Dividends are non-cumulative and may be paid in cash or Class B capital stock out of current net earnings or from unrestricted retained earnings, as authorized by our board of directors and subject to Finance Agency regulations. No dividend may be declared or paid if we are or would be, as a result of such payment, in violation of our minimum capital requirements. Moreover, we may not pay dividends if any principal or interest due on any consolidated obligation issued on behalf of any of the FHLBanks has not been paid in full or, under certain circumstances, if we fail to satisfy liquidity requirements under applicable Finance Agency regulations. For more information, see Item 5. Market for Registrant's Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.

On February 20, 2020,22, 2021, our board of directors declared a cash dividend on Class B-2 activity-based stock at an annualized rate of 4.25% (annualized)3.00% and on our Class B-1 capitalnon-activity-based stock and 3.40% (annualized)at an annualized rate of 1.75%. The dividends were paid in cash on our Class B-2 capital stock.February 24, 2021.

56
Table of Contents


Restricted Retained Earnings. In accordance with the JCE agreement, we allocate 20% of our net income each quarter to a restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account equals at least 1% of the average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter. These restricted retained earnings will not be available from which to pay dividends except to the extent the restricted retained earnings balance exceeds 1.5% of our average balance of outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter. We do not expect either level to be reached for several years.

Adequacy of Capital. In addition to possessing the authority to prohibit stock redemptions, our board of directors has the right to require our members to make additional capital stock purchases as needed to satisfy statutory and regulatory capital requirements.

Our board of directors has a statutory obligation to review and adjust member capital stock requirements in order to comply with our minimum capital requirements, and each member must comply promptly with any such requirement. However, a member could reduce its outstanding business with us as an alternative to purchasing stock.

Our board of directors assesses the adequacy of our capital every quarter, prior to the declaration of our quarterly dividend, by reviewing various measures set forth in our Capital Markets Policy. We developed our Capital Markets Policy based on guidance from the Finance Agency.

We must maintain sufficient permanent capital to meet the combined credit risk, market risk and operations risk components of the risk-based capital requirement.

Permanent capital is defined as the amount of our Class B stock (including MRCS) plus our retained earnings. We are required to maintain permanent capital at all times in an amount equal to our risk-based capital requirement, which includes the following components:

Credit risk, which represents the sum of our credit risk charges for all assets, off-balance sheet items and derivative contracts, calculated using the methodologies and risk weights assigned to each classification in the regulations;
Market risk, which represents the sum of the market value of our portfolio at risk from movements in interest rates, foreign exchange rates, commodity prices, and equity prices that could occur during periods of market stress, and the amount by which the market value of total capital is less than 85% of the book value of total capital; and
Operations risk, which represents 30% of the sum of our credit risk and market risk capital requirements.


64
Table of Contents


As presented in the following table, we were in compliance with the risk-based capital requirement at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 ($ amounts in millions).
Risk-Based Capital ComponentsDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Credit risk$294  $307  
Market risk198  298  
Operations risk147  182  
Total risk-based capital requirement$639  $787  
Permanent capital$3,412  $3,178  

Risk-Based Capital ComponentsDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Credit risk$158 $294 
Market risk327 198 
Operations risk146 147 
Total risk-based capital requirement$631 $639 
Permanent capital$3,596 $3,412 

The decrease in our total risk-based capital requirement was primarily caused by a decrease in the credit risk component, primarily for mortgage loans held for portfolio, based on changes in the requirements outlined in the Finance Agency Final Rule on FHLBank Capital Requirements, which took effect on January 1, 2020. This decrease was partially offset by an increase in market risk components due to changes in the market environment, including interest rates, spreads, and volatility, and changes in balance sheet composition. The operations risk component is calculated as 30% of the credit and market risk capital components. Our permanent capital at December 31, 20192020 remained well in excess of our total risk-based capital requirement.

In August 2019, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2019-03 requiring that, beginning in February 2020, we maintain a ratio of total regulatory capital stock to total assets, measured on a daily average basis at month end, of at least two percent. At December 31, 2020, our ratio exceeded this requirement.

By regulation, the Finance Agency may mandate us to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is generally required by the risk-based capital requirements as defined, in order to promote safe and sound operations. In addition, a Finance Agency rule authorizes the Director to issue an order temporarily increasing the minimum capital level for an FHLBank if the Director determines that the current level is insufficient to address such FHLBank's risks. The rule sets forth several factors that the Director may consider in making this determination.

57
Table of Contents


Under the Dodd-Frank Act, as implemented by the Finance Agency, each FHLBank is required to perform an annual stress test to assess the potential impact of various financial and economic conditions on capital adequacy. Our annual stress test was completed and published in November 2019, based on our financial condition as of December 31, 2018, using the methodology prescribed by the Finance Agency. Our stress test results demonstrated our capital adequacy under the severely adverse economic scenario defined by the Finance Agency.
The Finance Agency has established four capital classifications for the FHLBanks - adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized, and critically undercapitalized - and implemented the prompt corrective action provisions of HERA that apply to FHLBanks that are not deemed to be adequately capitalized. The Finance Agency determines our capital classification on at least a quarterly basis. If we are determined to be other than adequately capitalized, we would become subject to additional supervisory authority by the Finance Agency. Before implementing a reclassification, the Finance Agency Director would be required to provide us with written notice of the proposed action and an opportunity to respond. The Finance Agency's most recent determination is that we hold sufficient capital to be adequately capitalized and meet both our minimum capital and risk-based capital requirements. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1312 - Capital.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
 
The following table summarizes our off-balance-sheet arrangements (notional $ amounts in millions).
TypesDecember 31, 20192020
LettersStandby letters of credit outstanding
$449356 
Unused lines of credit (1)
1,012998 
Commitments to fund additional advances (2)
Commitments to fund or purchase mortgage loans, net (3)(2)
71180 
Unsettled CO bonds, at par150 
Unsettled discount notes, at par
400250 

(1)    Maximum line of credit amount for any member is $50,000.$50.
(2)    Generally for periods up to six months.
(3) Generally for periods up to 91 days.


65
Table of Contents


A standby letter of credit is a financing arrangement between us and one of our members for which we charge a fee. If we are required to make payment on a beneficiary's draw, the payment amount is converted into a collateralized advance to the member. The original terms of these standby letters of credit, including related commitments, range from 3 months1 month to 20 years. Lines of credit allow members to fund short-term cash needs (up to one year) without submitting a new application for each request for funds.

Our MPP was designed to require loan servicers to foreclose loans and liquidate properties in the servicer's name rather than in ourthe Bank's name. As the servicer progresses through the process from foreclosure to liquidation, we arethe Bank is paid in full for all unpaid principal and accrued interest on the loan through the normal remittance process and the servicer files a claim against the various credit enhancements for reimbursement of losses incurred. The claim is then reviewed and paid as appropriate under the various credit enhancement policies or guidelines. Subsequently, the servicer may submit claims to us for any remaining losses. At December 31, 2019,2020, principal previously paid in full by our MPP servicers totaling $1$1 million remains subject to potential claims by those servicers for any losses resulting from past or future liquidations of the underlying properties. An estimate of the losses is included in the MPP allowance for loan losses. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies and Note 76 - AllowanceMortgage Loans Held for Credit LossesPortfolio. For more information on additional commitments and contingencies, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1817 - Commitments and Contingencies.

58
Table of Contents


Contractual Obligations

The following table presents the payments due or expiration terms by specified contractual obligation type ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 20191 year or less1 to 3 years3 to 5 yearsAfter 5 yearsTotal
December 31, 2020December 31, 20201 year or less1 to 3 years3 to 5 yearsAfter 5 yearsTotal
Contractual obligations:Contractual obligations:Contractual obligations:
Long-term debt (1)
Long-term debt (1)
$23,405  $10,902  $4,706  $5,650  $44,663  
Long-term debt (1)
$31,126 $5,863 $1,605 $4,652 $43,246 
Operating leasesOperating leases—  —  —    Operating leases— — — 
Benefit payments (2)
Benefit payments (2)
 18   10  37  
Benefit payments (2)
25 16 52 
MRCS (3)
MRCS (3)
  178  136  323  
MRCS (3)
27 184 31 251 
TotalTotal$23,411  $10,928  $4,888  $5,797  $45,024  Total$31,141 $5,915 $1,794 $4,700 $43,550 

(1)     Includes CO bonds reported at par and based on contractual maturities but excludes discount notes due to their short-term nature. For more information on consolidated obligations, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1110 - Consolidated Obligations.
(2)     Amounts represent actuarial estimates of future benefit payments in accordance with the provisions of our SERP. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1514 - Employee and Director Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans.
(3)     The year of redemption is the later of: (i) the final year of the five-year redemption period, or (ii) the first year in which a non-member no longer has an activity-based stock requirement. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1312 - Capital.

66
Table of Contents


Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
 
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make a number of judgments, estimates, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities (if applicable), and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. We review these estimates and assumptions based on historical experience, changes in business conditions and other relevant factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Changes in estimates and assumptions have the potential to significantly affect our financial position and results of operations. In any given reporting period, our actual results may differ from the estimates and assumptions used in preparing our financial statements.

We determined that two of our accounting policies and estimates are critical because they require management to make particularly difficult, subjective, and/or complex judgments about matters that are inherently uncertain and because of the likelihood that materially different amounts could be reported under different conditions or using different assumptions. These accounting policies pertain to:

Derivatives and hedging activities (for more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities); and
Fair value estimates (for more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 1716 - Estimated Fair Values).

We believe the application of our accounting policies on a consistent basis enables us to provide financial statement users with useful, reliable and timely information about our results of operations, financial position and cash flows.

Accounting for Derivatives and Hedging Activities. All derivatives are recorded in the statement of condition at their estimated fair values. Changes in the estimated fair value of our derivatives are recorded in current period earnings regardless of how changes in the estimated fair value of assets or liabilities being hedged may be treated. Therefore, even though derivatives are used to mitigate market risk, derivatives introduce the potential for earnings volatility. Specifically, a mismatch can exist between the timing of income and expense recognition from assets or liabilities and the income effects of derivative instruments positioned to mitigate the market risk associated with those assets or liabilities. Therefore, during periods of significant changes in interest rates and other market factors, our earnings may experience greater volatility.

The accounting guidance related to derivative accounting is complex and contains strict documentation requirements. The details of each designated hedging relationship must be formally documented at the inception of the arrangement, including the risk management objective, hedging strategy, hedged item, specific risk being hedged, the derivative instrument and how effectiveness is being assessed. In all cases involving a recognized asset, liability or firm commitment, the designated risk being hedged is the risk of changes in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to changes in the designated benchmark interest rate.


59
Table of Contents


Generally, we endeavor to use derivatives that effectively hedge specific assets or liabilities and qualify for fair-value hedge accounting. For hedging relationships that qualify for hedge accounting and are designated as fair-value hedges, and qualify for hedge accounting, the change in the fair value of the derivative is recorded in current period earnings, thereby providing some offset to the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. Therisk is recorded in current period earnings, thereby providing an offset to the change in fair value of the derivative. Any difference in the change in fair value of the derivative and the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk represents "hedge ineffectiveness". If a fair valuefair-value hedging relationship qualifies for the shortcut method of hedge accounting, we can assume the change in the fair value of the derivative is perfectly offsetting the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk and, as a result, no ineffectiveness is recorded in earnings. To qualify for shortcut accounting treatment, a number of conditions must be met, including, but not limited to, the following:

the notional amount of the interest-rate swap matches the principal amount of the interest-bearing financial instrument being hedged;
the fair value of the interest-rate swap at the inception of the hedging relationship is zero;
the formula for computing net settlements under the interest-rate swap is the same for each net settlement; and
the interest-bearing financial instrument is not prepayable.

When applying the shortcut method, we document at hedge inception a quantitative method to assess hedge effectiveness if we would later determine that the use of the shortcut method was not or is no longer appropriate. By documenting a quantitative method at inception of the relationship, the risk associated with inappropriately applying the method is reduced as the quantitative method can be applied, if certain qualifying criteria are met, without having to dedesignate the hedge relationship as of the date it was determined the hedge no longer qualified for the shortcut method.

For those interest rate swaps, swaptions and caps
67
Table of Contents


Derivatives that are in fair-value hedging relationships thatbut do not qualify for the shortcut method are accounted for under the long-haul method of accounting, we use regressionmethod. Regression analysis to assess hedge effectiveness. Effectiveness testing is performed at the inception of each hedging relationship to determine whether the hedge is expected to be highly effective in offsetting the hedged risk, and at each month-end thereafter to ensure that the hedge relationship has been effective historically and is expected to be highly effective in the future. Hedging relationships accounted for under the shortcut method are not tested for hedge effectiveness.

A fair-value hedge relationship is considered highly effective only if certain specified criteria are met. If a hedge fails the effectiveness test at inception, we do not apply hedge accounting. If the hedge fails the effectiveness test during the life of the relationship, we discontinue hedge accounting prospectively. In that case, we continue to carry the derivative on the statement of condition at fair value, recognize the changes in fair value of that derivative in current earnings, cease adjusting the hedged item for changes in its fair value and amortize the cumulative basis adjustment on the hedged item into earnings over its remaining life. Unless and until the derivative is redesignated in a qualifying fair-value hedging relationship for accounting purposes, changes in its fair value are recorded in current earnings without an offsetting change in the fair value of the hedged item.

Generally, we endeavor to use derivatives that effectively hedge specific assets or liabilities and qualify for fair-value hedge accounting. Although substantially all of our derivatives qualify for fair-value hedge accounting, we treat all derivatives that do not qualify for fair-value hedge accounting as economic hedges for asset/liability management purposes. The changes in the estimated fair value of these economic hedges are recorded in other income as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities with no offsetting fair-value adjustments for the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments.

The fair values of our interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items are determined using standard valuation techniques such as discounted cash-flow analysis, which utilizes market estimates of interest rates and volatility, and comparisons to similar instruments. As such, the use of these estimates can have a significant impact on current period earnings. Although changes in estimated fair value can cause earnings volatility during the periods the derivative instruments are held, for hedges that qualify for fair-value hedge accounting, such changes do not have any net long-term economic effect or result in any net cash flows if the derivative and the hedged item are held to maturity. Since these estimated fair values eventually return to zero (or par value) on the maturity date, the effect of such fluctuations throughout the life of the hedging relationship is usually only a timing issue.

As of December 31, 2020, the Bank’s derivatives portfolio included $36.9 billion (notional amount) that was accounted for using the long-haul method, $3.3 billion (notional amount) that was accounted for using the shortcut method, and $10.2 billion (notional amount) that did not qualify for hedge accounting. By comparison, at December 31, 2019, the Bank’s derivativesderivatives portfolio included $40.9 billion (notional amount) that was accounted for using the long-haul method, $506 million (notional amount) that was accounted for using the shortcut method, and $9.0 billion (notional amount) that did not qualify for hedge accounting. By comparison, at December 31, 2018, the Bank’s derivatives portfolio included $36.0 billion (notional amount) that was accounted for using the long-haul method, $80 million (notional amount) that was accounted for using the shortcut method, and $1.7 billion (notional amount) that did not qualify for hedge accounting.

60
Table of Contents


Fair Value Estimates. We report certain assets and liabilities on the statement of condition at estimated fair value, including investments classified as trading, AFS, grantor trust assets, and all derivatives. "Fair value" is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset, or paid to transfer a liability, in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date (i.e., an exit price).date. We are required to consider factors specific to the asset or liability, the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability, and the participants with whom we would transact in that market. In general, the transaction price will equal the exit price and, therefore, represents the fair value of the asset or liability at initial recognition.

Estimated fair values are based on quoted market prices or market-based prices, if such prices are available. If quoted market prices or market-based prices are not available, estimated fair values are determined based on valuation models that use either:
 
discounted cash flows, using market estimates of interest rates and volatility; or 
dealer prices on similar instruments.

For external pricingvaluation models, we review the vendors' pricingvaluation processes, methodologies, and control procedures for reasonableness. For internal pricingvaluation models, the underlying assumptions are based on management's best estimates for:
 
discount rates;
prepayments;
market volatility; and
other factors.


68
Table of Contents


The assumptions used in both external and internal pricingvaluation models could have a significant effect on the reported fair values of assets and liabilities, including the related income and expense. The use of different assumptions, as well as changes in market conditions, could result in materially different values. We continue to refine our valuation methodologies as markets and products develop and the pricing for certain products becomes more or less transparent.

We categorize our financial instruments reported at estimated fair value into a three-level hierarchy. The valuation hierarchy is based upon the transparency (observable or unobservable) of inputs to the valuation of an asset or liability as of the measurement date. Observable inputs reflect market data obtained from independent sources, while unobservable inputs reflect our market assumptions. Level 1 instruments are those for which inputs to the valuation methodology are observable and are derived from quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that we can access on the measurement date. Level 2 instruments are those for which inputs are observable, either directly or indirectly, and include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities. Finally, level 3 instruments are those for which inputs are unobservable or are unable to be corroborated by external market data.

Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments
 
Accounting Developments. For a description of how recent accounting developments may impact our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

Legislative and Regulatory Developments.

Final Rules.

Finance Agency Final Rule on FHLBank Capital Requirements.Housing Goals Amendments. On February 20, 2019,June 25, 2020, the Finance Agency published a final rule, that adopts, with amendments, Finance Board regulations pertaining toeffective August 24, 2020, amending the capital requirements forFHLBank housing goals regulation. Enforcement of the FHLBanks.final rule will phase in over three years. The final rule became effective January 1, 2020 and carries over mostreplaces the four existing retrospective housing goals with a single prospective mortgage purchase housing goal target in which 20% of the prior Finance Board regulations without material change, but substantively revises the credit risk componentAMA mortgages purchased in a year must be comprised of the risk-based capital requirement, as well as the limitations on extensions of unsecured credit. The main revisions remove requirements that we calculate credit risk capital charges and unsecured credit limits based on ratings issued by an NRSRO, and instead require that we establish and use our own internal rating methodology.loans to low-income or very low-income families, or to families in low-income areas. The final rule also imposesestablishes a new credit risk capital charge for cleared derivatives. In addition,separate small member participation housing goal with a target level in which 50% of the members selling AMA loans in a calendar year must be small members. The final rule revisesprovides that an FHLBank may request Finance Agency approval of alternative target levels for either or both of the percentages used (in the regulation’s tables) to calculate credit risk capital charges for advances and for non-mortgage assets.goals. The final rule also rescinds certain contingency liquidity requirementsestablishes that were parthousing goals apply to each FHLBank that acquires any AMA mortgages during a year, eliminating the existing $2.5 billion volume threshold that previously triggered the application of the Finance Board regulations, because these requirements are now addressed in Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin 2018-07, "Federal Home Loan Bank Liquidity Guidance."

housing goals for each FHLBank. We do not expect this rule tobelieve these changes will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

61
Table of Contents


Proposed Rules.

Finance Agency Proposed Amendments toFinal Rule on Stress Test Rule.Testing. On December 16, 2019,March 24, 2020, the Finance Agency published proposed amendmentsa final rule, effective upon issuance, to amend its stress testing rule, consistent with section 401 of the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act of 2018 ("EGRRCPA"). The amendments would:final rule (i) raiseraises the minimum threshold for the requirement to conduct periodic stress tests for entities regulated by the Finance Agency to conduct periodic stress tests from those with consolidated assets of more than $10 billion to those with$250 billion or more in total consolidated assets of more than $250 billion;assets; (ii) generally removeremoves the requirements for FHLBanks to conduct stress tests;testing; and (iii) removeremoves the adverse scenario from the list of required scenarios. However, under the proposed amendments,FHLBanks are currently excluded from this regulation because no FHLBank has total consolidated assets over $250 billion, but the Finance Agency Director would retain authority andreserved its discretion to impose stress testing requirements on anyrequire an FHLBank with total consolidated assets below the $250 billion threshold. The proposedthreshold to conduct stress testing. These amendments would align the Finance Agency'sAgency’s stress testing rulesrule with rules adopted by other financial institution regulators pursuant tothat implement the Dodd-Frank Act stress testing requirements, as amended by EGRRCPA. This rule eliminates these stress testing requirements for the EGRRCPA.Bank, unless the Finance Agency exercises its discretion to require stress testing in the future. We do not expect this rule to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

The results
69
Table of our most recent annual stress test wereContents


Margin and Capital Requirements for Covered Swap Entities. On July 1, 2020, the OCC, the Federal Reserve Board ("Federal Reserve"), the FDIC, the Farm Credit Administration, and the Finance Agency (collectively, "Prudential Banking Regulators") jointly published on our public website, www.fhlbi.com, on November 15, 2019. Ifa final rule, effective August 31, 2020, amending regulations that established minimum margin and capital requirements for uncleared swaps for covered swap entities under the amendments are adopted as proposed, we will no longer be subjectjurisdiction of the Prudential Banking Regulators ("Prudential Margin Rules"). In addition to these stress testing requirementsother changes, the final rule: (1) allows swaps entered into by a covered swap entity prior to an applicable compliance date to retain their legacy status and not become subject to the Finance Agency's ongoing discretion.Prudential Margin Rules in the event that the legacy swaps are amended to replace an interbank offered rate (such as LIBOR) or other discontinued rate, or due to other technical amendments, notional reductions or portfolio compression exercises; (2) introduces a new Phase 6 compliance date for initial margin requirements for covered swap entities and their counterparties with an average daily aggregate notional amount ("AANA") of uncleared swaps of at least $8 billion, and limits Phase 5 to counterparties with an AANA of uncleared swaps from $50 billion to $750 billion; and (3) clarifies that initial margin ("IM") trading documentation does not need to be executed prior to the parties becoming obligated to exchange IM.

On the same date, the Prudential Banking Regulators published an interim final rule, effective September 1, 2020, extending the IM compliance date for Phase 6 counterparties to September 1, 2022. On November 9, 2020, the CFTC issued a final rule extending the IM compliance date for Phase 6 counterparties to September 1, 2022, thereby aligning with the Prudential Banking Regulators.

Further, on January 5, 2021, the CFTC published a final rule, effective February 4, 2021, that primarily amends the minimum margin and capital requirements for uncleared swaps under the jurisdiction of the CFTC ("CFTC Margin Rules") by requiring covered entities to use a revised AANA calculation starting on September 1, 2022. The amendments, among other things, require entities subject to the CFTC’s jurisdiction to calculate the AANA for uncleared swaps during March, April and May of the current year, based on an average of month-end dates, as opposed to the previous requirement which required the calculation of AANA during June, July and August of the prior year, based on daily calculations. Parties would continue to be expected to exchange IM based on the AANA totals as of September 1 of the current year. These amendments align with the recommendation of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision and Board of the International Organization of Securities Commissions. Separately, on January 25, 2021, the CFTC published a final rule, effective February 24, 2021, that amends the CFTC Margin Rules to permit, among other changes, covered swap entities to maintain separate minimum transfer amounts ("MTA") for IM and variation margin for each swap counterparty, provided the combined MTA does not exceed $500,000.

We donot expect these rules to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

FDIC Brokered Deposits Restrictions. The Federal Deposit Insurance Act, as implemented by FDIC regulations, prohibits any insured depository institution that is not "well capitalized" from accepting any deposit obtained, directly or indirectly, by or through any "deposit broker," though "adequately capitalized" institutions may request a waiver from this prohibition. On December 12, 2019,January 22, 2021, the FDIC issuedpublished a proposedfinal rule, to amend theeffective April 1, 2021, that amends its brokered deposits restrictionsregulations that apply to less-than-well-capitalizedless than well-capitalized insured depositories.depository institutions. The proposedFDIC stated the amendments are intended to modernize and clarify the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations in light of significant changes in technology, business models, the economic environment, and products since the regulations were first adopted, and wouldthey establish a new framework for analyzing the deposit broker definition, which determines whether deposits placed through deposit placement arrangements qualify as brokered deposits. These deposit placement arrangements include those between insured depositoriesdepository institutions and third parties, such as financial technology companies, for a variety of business purposes, including access to deposits. By creating a new framework for analyzing certain provisionsThe amendments to the FDIC’s brokered deposit regulations, among other things, clarify what it means to be engaged in the business of facilitating the "deposit broker" definition, including reducing the listplacement of activities considered "facilitating"deposits and expandingexpand the scope of the "primary purpose" exception,primary purpose exception. The rule amendments are expected to have the proposed rule would narroweffect of narrowing the definition of "deposit broker"deposit broker and thereby excludeexcluding more deposits from treatment as brokered deposits.

If these The amendments are adopted as proposed,also establish an application and reporting process with respect to the primary purpose exception for businesses that do not meet one of several bright-line tests, and they affirm the FDIC’s position that the brokering of certificates of deposit constitutes deposit brokering. This rule may reducehave an effect on member demand for certain advances, but at this time we cannot predict the extent of the impact on our advances.

Joint Proposed Rule on Margin and Capital Requirements for Agency-Covered Swap Entities. On November 7, 2019, the OCC, the FRB, the FDIC, the Farm Credit Administration and the Finance Agency (collectively, the "Agencies") jointly published a proposed rule that would amend the Agencies' regulations governing minimum margin and capital requirements for uncleared swaps ("Prudential Margin Rules") for covered swap entities under the jurisdiction of one of the Agencies ("Agency-covered swap entities"). The proposed amendments, among other things, would permit uncleared swaps entered into by Agency-covered swap entities before the compliance date of the Prudential Margin Rules ("Agency-legacy swaps") to retain legacy status and not become subject to the Prudential Margin Rules in the event that they are amended to replace LIBOR or another rate that is reasonably expected to be discontinued or is reasonably determined to have lost its relevance as a reliable benchmark due to a significant impairment. The proposed rule would also amend the Prudential Margin Rules to: (i) extend the phase-in compliance date for initial margin requirements from September 1, 2020 to September 1, 2021 for Agency-covered swap entity counterparties with an average daily aggregate notional amount of non-cleared swaps from $8 billion to $50 billion; (ii) clarify that an Agency-covered swap entity is not required to execute an initial margin trading agreement with a counterparty before the counterparty is required to collect or post initial margin; and (iii) permit Agency-legacy swaps to retain their legacy status and not become subject to the Prudential Margin Rules in the event that such swaps are amended due to certain life-cycle activities, such as reductions of notional amounts or portfolio compression exercises.

As an Agency-covered swap entity, weimpact. We do not expect this rule if adopted as proposed, to have a material adverse effect onmaterially affect our financial condition or results of operations.


62
Table of Contents


Advisory Bulletins.

Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin (2020-01) -2020-01 Federal Home Loan Bank Risk Management of AMA.AMA Risk Management. On January 31, 2020, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2020-01 relating to the FHLBanks'released guidance on risk management of AMA risk. This advisory bulletinAMA. The guidance communicates the Finance Agency'sAgency’s expectations with respect to an FHLBank'sFHLBank’s funding of its members through the purchase of eligible mortgage loans and includes expectations that an FHLBank will have board-established limits on AMA portfolios and management-established thresholds to serve as monitoring tools to manage AMA-related risk exposure. The advisory bulletin indicatesguidance provides that the board of directors of an FHLBank should ensure that the FHLBank's AMAFHLBank serves as a liquidity source for members, and the FHLBank should ensure that its portfolio limits do not result in the bank'sFHLBank’s acquisition of mortgage loansmortgages from smaller members being "crowded out"“crowded out” by itsthe acquisition of mortgage loansmortgages from larger members. The advisory bulletin also indicatescontains the expectation that the board of directorsan FHLBank should set limits on the size and growth of AMA portfolios and on AMA acquisitions from a single PFI. In addition, the guidance provides that the board of directorsan FHLBank should consider concentration risk with respect toin the areas of geographic area, high-balance loans, and in third-party loan originations as it establishes limits on the FHLBank's AMA portfolio. The FHLBanks should be able to demonstrate their progress toward adherence to this advisory bulletin by September 30, 2020 and should have their final limits in place by December 31, 2020.

Our MPP portfolio is a key component of our business strategy and our core mission assets, making up approximately 25% of our core mission assets as of December 31, 2019. Through MPP Advantage, we acquire mortgage loans on properties in multiple jurisdictions and geographic areas from member institutions of varying sizes. We maintain limits on the size and growth of our MPP portfolio, and we monitor and limit concentration risks in the portfolio, such as purchases from a single PFI. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of this advisory bulletin on our financial condition and results of operations.

Advisory Bulletin 2019-03 - Capital Stock Management. On August 14, 2019, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2019-03 to provide guidance that augments existing statutory and regulatory capital requirements. The advisory bulletin requires each FHLBank to maintain a ratio of at least two percent of capital stock to total assets in order to help preserve the cooperative structure incentives that encourage members to remain fully engaged in the oversight of their investment in the FHLBank. The advisory bulletin indicates that, beginning in February 2020, the Finance Agency will consider the proportion of capital stock to assets, measured on a daily average basis at month-end, when assessing each FHLBank's capital management practices.

originations. We do not expect this advisory bulletin to have a material adverse effect on our capital management practices, financial condition, or results of operations.

Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin 2019-01 - Business Resiliency Management. On May 7, 2019, the Finance Agency issued Advisory Bulletin 2019-01 on Business Resiliency Management for FHLBanks and other entities regulated by the Finance Agency that communicates the Finance Agency's expectations with respect to minimizing the impact of disruptions in service from uncontrolled events and the maintenance of business operations at predefined levels. This advisory bulletin indicates that a business resiliency program should guide the regulated entity's appropriate responses to disruptions affecting business operations, personnel, equipment, facilities, IT systems, and information assets. In addition, the bulletin provides guidance on the elements of a safe and sound business resiliency program, which include governance, risk assessment and business impact analysis, risk mitigation and plan development, testing and analysis, and risk monitoring and program sustainability. This advisory bulletin rescinds Finance Board Advisory Bulletin 2002-03 on disaster recovery planning.

We do not expect this advisory bulletin to have a material adverse effect onmaterially affect our financial condition or results of operations.

Other Developments.

Brexit. On January 31, 2020, the United Kingdom ("UK") withdrew from the European Union ("EU")(the action commonly referred to as "Brexit"). During the ensuing transition period, the UK and the EU will negotiate the details of their future relationship, including the conditions that will apply to EU-based entities that want to do business with the UK, and vice versa, after the transition period.

From time to time we may have exposure to UK-based and EU-based counterparties, and we have a UK-based derivatives clearing organization for our cleared derivatives. At this time it is not possible to predict the date on which the transition period will end or whether any agreement reached between the UK and the EU will have a material adverse effect on the financial instruments we have with these counterparties or on our derivatives cleared in the UK.


6370
Table of Contents


CFTC No-action Relief for Amendments Relating to Interbank Offered Rates. On December 17, 2019, the CFTC issued no-action letters to provide relief with respect to the transition away from LIBOR and other interbank offered rates (collectively, "IBORs"). Among other forms of relief, the letters, subject to certain limitations:

(i) permit registered swap dealers, major swap participants, security-based swap participants, and major security-based swap participants to amend "legacy" uncleared swaps (entered into before the compliance date of the CFTC's uncleared swap margin requirements ("CFTC margin rules")) to include LIBOR or other IBOR fallbacks without the legacy swap becoming subject to the CFTC margin rules; and

(ii) provide time-limited relief, until December 31, 2021, for (a) swaps that are not subject to the central clearing requirement because they were executed prior to the relevant compliance date and (b) swaps that are subject to the trade execution requirement to be amended to include LIBOR or other IBOR fallbacks without becoming subject to such clearing or trade execution requirements.

As a major swap participant, we do not expect these no-action letters to have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.Transition.

Finance Agency Supervisory Letter - Planning for LIBOR Phase-Out.On September 27, 2019, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter ("LIBOR Supervisory Letter") to the FHLBanks that the Finance Agency stated is designed to ensure the FHLBanks will be able to identify and prudently manage the risks associated with the termination of LIBOR in a safe and sound manner. The LIBOR Supervisory Letter providesprovided that the FHLBanks should, by December 31, 2019, stop purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. In addition, the FHLBanks should, by March 31, 2020, cease entering into new LIBOR-referenced financial assets, liabilities, and derivatives with maturities beyond December 31, 2021 for all product types subjectexcept investments. With respect to limited exceptions grantedinvestments, the FHLBanks were required, by the Finance Agency for LIBOR-linked productsDecember 31, 2019, to stop purchasing investments that serve compelling mission, risk mitigating, or hedging purposes that do not currently have readily available alternatives.

reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. These phase-out dates dodid not apply to collateral accepted by the FHLBanks. However, theThe LIBOR Supervisory Letter directsalso directed the FHLBanks to update their pledged collateral certification reporting requirements by March 31, 2020, in an effort to encourage members to distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral maturing after December 31, 2021.

In accordance with The FHLBanks were expected to cease entering into LIBOR-indexed financial instruments maturing after December 31, 2021, by the deadlines specified in the LIBOR Supervisory Letter, wesubject to limited exceptions granted by the FHFA for LIBOR-linked products serving compelling mission, risk mitigating, and/or hedging purposes that do not currently have readily available alternatives. We have already ceased purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. We have also suspended

As a result of the issuance of LIBOR-indexed debt with maturities beyond 2021. However, until March 31,market volatility experienced during 2020 we will continuedue in part by the COVID-19 pandemic, the Finance Agency extended the FHLBanks' authority to issue fixed-rate debt with maturities beyond 2021 that are hedged with LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps. Beginning March 31, 2020, we will no longer enter into derivatives with swaps, caps, or floors indexed to LIBOR that terminate after December 31, 2021. Further, beginning March 31, 2020, we expect to suspend transactions in certain structured advances and advances with terms directly linked to LIBORLIBOR-based instruments that mature after December 31, 2021. We are also revising our members’2021 from March 31, 2020 to June 30, 2020, except for investments and option embedded products. In addition, the Finance Agency extended the requirement to update pledged collateral certification reporting requirements from March 31, 2020 to distinguish LIBOR-linked collateralSeptember 30, 2020.

We do not expect the LIBOR Supervisory Letter and the related subsequent guidance will have a material effect on our financial condition or results of operations.

LIBOR Transition – ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol and Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions. On October 23, 2020, the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA"), published a Supplement to the 2006 ISDA Definitions ("Supplement") and the ISDA 2020 IBOR Fallbacks Protocol ("Protocol"). Both the Supplement and the Protocol took effect on January 25, 2021. On that maturesdate, all legacy bilateral derivative transactions subject to Protocol-covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) that incorporate certain covered ISDA definitional booklets and reference a covered Interbank Offered Rate ("IBOR"), including U.S. Dollar LIBOR, were effectively amended to apply the new ISDA-recommended IBOR fallbacks in the event of the relevant IBOR’s cessation. Both the Bank and our counterparty must have adhered to the Protocol in order to effectively amend legacy derivatives contracts, otherwise the parties must bilaterally amend legacy covered agreements (including ISDA agreements) to address LIBOR fallbacks. The Protocol will remain open for adherence after the effective date. As of January 25, 2021, all new derivative contracts are subject to the relevant IBOR fallbacks set forth in the Supplement.

On October 21, 2020, the Finance Agency issued a Supervisory Letter to the FHLBanks that required each FHLBank to adhere to the Protocol by December 31, 2020, and to the extent necessary, to amend any bilateral agreements regarding the adoption of the Protocol by December 15, 2020.

We adhered to the Protocol effective as of October 22, 2020, and all of our counterparties have adhered to the Protocol.

LIBOR Transition – Announcement of Future Cessation and Loss of Representativeness of the LIBOR Benchmarks. On March 5, 2021, the FCA, a regulator of financial services firms and financial markets in the UK, announced U.S. dollar LIBOR will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021.

2021, or, in the case of some more frequently used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings, immediately after June 30, 2023. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of the Supervisory LetterFCA's announcement on our financial condition and results of operations. For a discussion of the potential impact of the LIBOR transition, see Item 1A. Risk Factors.

COVID-19 Developments.

CFTC Staff Advisory on Initial Margin Documentation Requirements.Finance Agency Supervisory Letter – Paycheck Protection Program ("PPP") Loans as Collateral for FHLBank Advances. On July 9, 2019,April 23, 2020, the CFTCFinance Agency issued a staff advisorySupervisory Letter ("Advisory"PPP Supervisory Letter") on Margin Requirementspermitting the FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral for Uncleared Swaps for Swap Dealers and Major Swap Participants ("Margin Rules"),advances as "Agency Securities," given the SBA's 100 percent guarantee of the UPB. On April 20, 2020, the SBA published its third interim final rule related to clarifyPPP loans, which explicitly waived certain regulatory requirements that documentation governingmust be satisfied before a member could pledge PPP loans to the posting, collection, and custodyFHLBanks as collateral. The PPP Supervisory Letter establishes a series of initial margin is not required to be completed until such timeconditions under which the FHLBanks may accept PPP loans as the aggregate unmargined exposure to a counterparty (and its margin affiliates) exceeds a threshold of $50 million. Under the Margin Rules, covered swap entities and non-prudentially regulated swap dealers generally are required to post and collect initial margin with counterparties that are swap dealers or financial end users with material swap exposure. The Margin Rules, however, contain an initial margin threshold amount of $50 million between a covered swap entity (and its margin affiliates)collateral, which conditions focus on the one hand,financial condition of members, collateral discounts, and its counterparty (and its margin affiliates), onpledge dollar limits. On December 27, 2020, the other hand.President signed into law an extension of the PPP until March 31, 2021. The April 23, 2020 Supervisory Letter from the Finance Agency allowing FHLBanks to accept PPP loans as collateral remains in effect.

The Advisory clarifies that no initial margin documentation is required until the amount of initial margin exchangeable between a covered swap entity (and its margin affiliates) and its counterparty (and its margin affiliates) exceeds that initial margin threshold amount. The Advisory does, however, instruct covered swap entities to closely monitor initial margin amounts if they are approaching the $50 million threshold with a counterparty and to take appropriate steps to ensure that required documentation is in place at such time as the threshold is reached. The Advisory confirms the September 1, 2020 compliance deadline for us under the Margin Rules.

We continue to monitor developments relating to the Margin Rules and our bilateral derivatives balances.

6471
Table of Contents


CARES Act. The CARES Act was signed into law on March 27, 2020. The $2.2 trillion package was the largest stimulus bill in U.S. history. The CARES Act is in addition to previous relief legislation passed by Congress in March 2020. The legislation provides the following:

Assistance to businesses, states, and municipalities;
A loan program for small businesses, non-profits and physician practices that can be forgiven through employee retention incentives;
Treasury Secretary authority to make loans or loan guarantees to states, municipalities, and eligible businesses and loosening some regulations imposed through the Dodd-Frank Act;
Direct payments to eligible taxpayers and their families;
Expanded eligibility for unemployment insurance and payment amounts; and
Mortgage forbearance provisions and a foreclosure moratorium.

Funding for the PPP, which was created by the CARES Act, was increased with the enactment of subsequent laws, most recently by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, on December 27, 2020. While some provisions of the CARES Act have expired, others have been extended by regulatory and legislative action. Additional phases of the CARES Act or other COVID-19 pandemic relief legislation may be enacted by Congress. We continue to evaluate the potential impact of such legislation on our business, including its continued impact to the U.S. economy; impacts to mortgages held or serviced by our members and that we accept as collateral; and the impacts on our MPP.

Additional COVD-19 Presidential, Legislative and Regulatory Developments. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic, President Biden (and previously, President Trump), through executive orders, governmental agencies, including the SEC, OCC, Federal Reserve, FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, CFTC and the Finance Agency, as well as state governments and agencies, have taken, and may continue to take, actions to provide various forms of relief from, and guidance regarding, the financial, operational, credit, market, and other effects of the pandemic, some of which may have a direct or indirect impact on us or our members. Many of these actions are temporary in nature. We continue to monitor these actions and guidance as they evolve and to evaluate their potential impact on us.



72
Table of Contents


Risk Management

We have exposure to a number of risks in pursuing our business objectives. These risks may be broadly classified as market, credit, liquidity, operational, and business. Market risk is discussed in Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk.

Active risk management is an integral part of our operations because these risks are an inherent part of our business activities. We manage these risks by, among other actions, setting and enforcing appropriate limits and developing and maintaining internal policies and processes to ensure an appropriate risk profile. In order to enhance our ability to manage Bank-wide risk, our risk management function is structured to segregate risk measurement, monitoring, and evaluation from our business units where risk-taking occurs through financial transactions and positions.

The Finance Agency has established certain risk-related compliance requirements. In addition, our board of directors has established a Risk Appetite Statement that summarizes the amounts, levels and types of enterprise-wide risk that our management is authorized to undertake in pursuit of achieving our mission and executing our strategic plans. The Risk Appetite Statement incorporates high level qualitative and quantitative risk limits and tolerances from our Enterprise Risk Management Policy, which serves as a key policy to address our exposures to market, credit, liquidity, operational and business risks, and from various other key risk-related policies approved by our board of directors, including the Operational Risk Management Policy, the Model Risk Management Policy, the Credit Policy, the Capital Markets Policy, and the Enterprise Information Security Policy.

Effective risk management programs include not only conformance of specific risk management practices to the Enterprise Risk Management Policy and other key risk-related policy requirements, but also the active involvement of our board of directors. Our board of directors has established a Risk Oversight Committee that provides focus, direction and accountability for our risk management process. Further, pursuant to the Enterprise Risk Management Policy, the following internal management committees focus on risk management, among other duties:

Executive Management Committee
Facilitates planning, coordination and communication among our operating divisions and the other committees;
Focuses on leadership, teamwork and our resources to best serve organizational priorities; and
Generally oversees the following committees' activities.
Member Services Committee
Focuses on new and existing member services and products and oversees the effectiveness of the risk mitigation framework for member services and products; and
Promotes cross-functional communication and exchange of ideas pertaining to member products offered to achieve financial objectives established by the board of directors and senior management while remaining within prescribed risk parameters.
Capital Markets Committee
Focuses on the Bank's investment and funding activities as they relate to financial performance, risk profile and the Bank's strategic direction; and
Deliberates proposed strategies to meet funding needs and achieve financial performance objectives established by the board of directors and senior management, while remaining within established risk control parameters.
IT Steering Committee
Monitors our technology-related activities, strategies, risk positions and issues; and
Promotes cross-functional communication and exchange of ideas pertaining to the technology directions and actions undertaken to achieve our strategic and financial objectives.

65
Table of Contents


Strategy Risk Management Committee
Provides strategic direction in the management of key risk exposures and risk policies, and adjudicates strategic risk issues as they arise (credit, market, liquidity, advance lending, AMA, investment portfolio, treasury, operations, regulatory and reputation); and
Identifies and evaluates current and emerging risks and opportunities - makescourse corrections as circumstances and events dictate.
Oversees the actions of the following committees.
Risk Committee
Oversees the identification, monitoring, measurement, evaluation and reporting of risks; and
Promotes cross-functional communication and exchange of ideas pertaining to oversight of our risk profile in accordance with guidelines and objectives established by our board of directors and senior management.
Oversees the actions of the following committee.
Information Security Steering Committee
Oversees the Bank's Information Security Program, which includes enterprise information security, cybersecurity, and physical security.


73
Table of Contents


Asset Liability Committee
Evaluates the impact of macro-economic, interest rate and financial market conditions on the Bank's financial performance and capital levels; and
Determines enterprise-level asset-liability management strategies.

Each of the committees is responsible for overseeing its respective business activities in accordance with specified policies, in addition to ongoing consideration of pertinent risk-related issues.

We have a formal process for the assessment of Bank-wide risk and risk-related issues. Our risk assessment process is designed to identify and evaluate material risks, including both quantitative and qualitative aspects, which could adversely affect achievement of our financial performance objectives and compliance with applicable requirements. Business unit managers play a significant role in this process, as they are best positioned to identify and understand the risks inherent in their respective operations. These assessments evaluate the inherent risks within each of the key processes as well as the controls and strategies in place to manage those risks, identify primary weaknesses, and recommend actions that should be undertaken to address the identified weaknesses. The results of these assessments are summarized in an annual risk assessment report, which is reviewed by senior management and our board of directors. 
66
Table of Contents


Credit Risk Management. Credit risk is the risk that members or other counterparties may be unable to meet their contractual obligations to us, or that the values of those obligations will decline as a result of deterioration in the members' or other counterparties' creditworthiness. Credit risk arises when our funds are extended, committed, invested or otherwise exposed through actual or implied contractual agreements. We face credit risk on advances and other credit products, investments, mortgage loans, derivative financial instruments, and AHP grants. 

The most important step in the management of credit risk is the initial decision to extend credit. We also manage credit risk by following established policies, evaluating the creditworthiness of our members and counterparties, and utilizing collateral agreements and settlement netting. Periodic monitoring of members and other counterparties is performed whenever we are exposed to credit risk.
Advances and Other Credit Products. We manage our exposure to credit risk on advances primarily through a combination of our security interests in assets pledged by our borrowers and ongoing reviews of our borrowers' financial strength. Credit analyses are performed on existing borrowers, with the frequency and scope determined by the financial strength of the borrower and/or the amount of our credit products outstanding to that borrower. We establish limits and other requirements for advances and other credit products.

Section 10(a) of the Bank Act prohibits us from making an advance without sufficient collateral to fully secure the advance. Security is provided via thorough underwriting and establishing a perfected position in eligible assets pledged by the borrower as collateral before an advance is made by filing Uniform Commercial Code financing statements in the appropriate jurisdictions. Each member's collateral reporting requirement is based on its collateral status, which reflects its financial condition and type of institution, and our review of conflicting liens, with our level of control increasing when a borrower's financial performance deteriorates. We continually evaluate the quality and value of collateral pledged to support advances and work with members to improve the accuracy of valuations.

For bothAt December 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, advances outstanding to our insurance company members represented represente47%d 43% and 47%, respectively, of our total advances outstanding, at par. We believe that advances outstanding to our insurance company members and the relative percentage of their advances to the total could increase, based upon the significant portion of total financial assets held by insurance companies in our district. Although insurance companies represent growth opportunities for our credit products, they have different risk characteristics than our depository members. Some of the ways we mitigate this risk include requiring insurance companies to deliver collateral to us or our custodian and using industry-specific underwriting approaches as part of our ongoing evaluation of our insurance company members' financial strength.

A captive insurance company insures risks of its parent, affiliated companies and/or other entities under common control. We generally requireWhile our captive insurance companycompanies were members, we generally required them to, among other requirements: (i) pledge the collateral free of other encumbrances, (ii) collateralize all obligations to us, including prepayment fees, accrued interest and any outstanding AHP or MPP obligations, (iii) obtain our prior approval before pledging whole loan collateral, and (iv) provide annual audit reports of the member entity and its ultimate parent, as well as quarterly unaudited financial statements.


74
Table of Contents


On February 19, 2021, the Bank terminated the memberships of its two remaining captive insurance company members. Both companies were admitted as FHLBank members prior to September 12, 2014, and did not meet the definition of "insurance company" or fall within another category of institution that is eligible for FHLBank membership under the Final Membership Rule.

Borrowing Limits. Generally, we maintain a credit products borrowing limit of 50%40% of a depository member's adjusted assets, defined as total assets less borrowings from all sources.assets. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had no advances outstanding to a depository member whose total credit products exceeded 50%40% of its adjustedtotal assets.

The initial borrowing limit for our insurance company members (excluding captive insurance companies) is 25% of their total general account assets (net admitted assets less money borrowed.separate accounts). Credit extensions to insurance company members whose total credit products exceed this threshold require an additional approval by our Bank as provided in our credit policy. The approval is based upon a number of factors that may include the member's financial condition, collateral quality, business plan and earnings stability. We also monitor these members more closely on an ongoing basis. AsAs of December 31, 2019,2020, we had no advances outstanding to an insurance company member whose total credit products exceeded 25% of their general account assets, net of money borrowed.assets.

New or renewed credit extensions to captive insurance companies that became members prior to September 12, 2014 are subjectwere subject to certain regulatory restrictions relating to maturity dates and cannotcould not exceed 40% of the member's total assets. As of December 31, 2019, one2020, no such captive insurance company member's total balance outstanding balance of credit products exceeded the percentage limit. Therefore,

The credit products borrowing limit for our non-depository CDFI members is 25% of their total restricted assets. As of December 31, 2020, we had no new or renewedadvances outstanding to a non-depository CDFI member whose total credit extensions have been provided to this member.products exceeded 25% of their total unrestricted assets. We may impose additional restrictionsrestrictions on extensions of credit to our members including captive insurance companies, at our discretion.

67
Table of Contents


Concentration. Our credit risk is magnified due to the concentration of advances in a few borrowers.borrowers. As of December 31, 2019,2020, our top borrower held 13%15% of total advances outstanding, at par, and our top five borrowers held 42%44% of total advances outstanding, at par. As a result of this concentration, we perform frequent credit and collateral reviews on our largest borrowers. In addition, we analyze the implications to our financial management and profitability if we were to lose the business of one or more of these borrowers.
 
Collateral Requirements. We generally require all borrowers to execute a security agreement that grants us a blanket lien on substantially all assets of the member. Our agreements with borrowers require each borrowing entity to fully secure all outstanding extensions of credit at all times, including advances, accrued interest receivable, standby letters of credit, correspondent services, certain AHP transactions, and all indebtedness, liabilities or obligations arising or incurred as a result of a member transacting business with our Bank. We may also require a member to pledge additional collateral to cover exposure resulting from any applicable prepayment fees on advances.

The assets that constitute eligible collateral to secure extensions of credit are set forth in Section 10(a) of the Bank Act. In accordance with the Bank Act, we accept the following assets as collateral:

fully disbursed, whole first mortgages on improved residential property, or securities representing a whole interest in such mortgages;
securities issued, insured, or guaranteed by the United States government or any Agency thereof (including, without limitation, MBS issued or guaranteed by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, or Ginnie Mae);
cash or deposits in an FHLBank; and
ORERC acceptable to us if such collateral has a readily ascertainable value and we can perfect our interest in the collateral.

Additionally, for any CFI, as defined in accordance with the Bank Act, we may also accept secured loans for small business, agricultural and community development activities.


75
Table of Contents


In addition to our internal credit risk management policies and procedures, Section 10(e) of the Bank Act affords priority of any security interest granted to us, by a member or such member's affiliate, over the claims or rights of any other party, including any receiver, conservator, trustee, or similar entity that has the rights of a lien creditor, except for claims held by bona fide purchasers for value or by parties that are secured by prior perfected security interests, provided that such claims would otherwise be entitled to priority under applicable law. Moreover, with respect to federally-insured depository institution borrowers, our claims are given certain preferences pursuant to the receivership provisions of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act. With respect to insurance company members, however, Congress provided in the McCarran-Ferguson Act of 1945 that state law generally governs the regulation of insurance and shall not be preempted by federal law unless the federal law expressly regulates the business of insurance. Thus, if a court were to determine that the priority provision of Section 10(e) of the Bank Act conflicts with state insurance law applicable to our insurance company members, the court might then determine that the priority of our security interest would be governed by state law, not Section 10(e). Under these circumstances, the "super lien" priority protection afforded to our security interest under Section 10(e) may not fully apply when we lend to such insurance company members. However, we monitor applicable states' laws, and our security interests in collateral posted by insurance company members have express statutory protections in the jurisdictions where our members are domiciled. In addition, we take all necessary action under applicable state law to obtain and maintain a prior perfected security interest in the collateral, including by taking possession or control of the collateral as appropriate.

Collateral Status. When an institution becomes a member of our Bank, we assign the member to a collateral status after the initial underwriting review. The assignment of a member to a collateral status category reflects, in part, our philosophy of increasing our level of control over the collateral pledged by the member, when warranted, based on our underwriting conclusions and a review of our lien priority. Some members pledge and report collateral under a blanket lien established through the security agreement, while others are placed on specific listings or possession status or a combination of the three via a hybrid status. We take possession of all collateral posted by insurance companies to further ensure our position as a first-priority secured creditor. A depository institution member may elect a more restrictive collateral status to receive a higher lendable value for their collateral.

68
Table of Contents


The primary features of these three collateral status categories are:

Blanket:

only certain financially sound depository institutions are eligible;
institutions that have granted a blanket lien to another creditor may be eligible if an inter-creditor or subordination agreement is executed;
review and approval by credit services management is required;
member retains possession of eligible whole loan collateral pledged to us;
member executes a written security agreement and agrees to hold such collateral for our benefit; and
member provides periodic reports of all eligible collateral.

Specific Listings:

applicable to depository institutions that demonstrate potential weakness in their financial condition or seek lower over-collateralization requirements;
may be available to institutions that have granted a blanket lien to another creditor if an inter-creditor or subordination agreement is executed;
member retains possession of eligible whole loan collateral pledged to us;
member executes a written security agreement and agrees to hold such collateral for our benefit; and
member provides loan level detail on the pledged collateral on at least a monthly basis.

Possession:

applicable to all insurance companies, non-depository CDFI's, Housing Associates, and those depository institutions demonstrating less financial strength than those approved for specific listings;
required for all de novo institutions and institutions that have granted a blanket lien to another creditor but have not executed an inter-creditor or subordination agreement;
safekeeping for securities pledged as collateral can be with us or a third-party custodian that we have pre-approved;
original notes and other documents related to whole loans pledged as collateral are held with a third-party custodian that we have pre-approved;
member executes a written security agreement; and
member provides loan level detail on the pledged collateral on at least a monthly basis.
76
Table of Contents


Collateral Valuation. In order to mitigate the market, credit, liquidity, operational and business risk associated with collateral, we apply an over-collateralization requirement to the book value or market value of pledged collateral to establish its lendable value. Collateral that we have determined to contain a low level of risk, such as United States government obligations, is over-collateralized at a lower rate than collateral that carries a higher level of risk, such as small business loans. The over-collateralization requirement applied to asset classes may vary depending on collateral status, because lower requirements are applied as our levels of information and control over the assets increase.

We have made changes to, and continue to update, our internal valuation model to gain greater consistency between model-generated valuations and observed market prices, resulting in adjustments to lendable values on whole loan collateral. We routinely engage outside pricing vendors to benchmark our modeled pricing on residential and commercial real estate collateral, and we modify valuations where appropriate.

69
Table of Contents


The following table provides information regarding credit products outstanding with borrowers based on their reporting status at December 31, 2019,2020, along with their corresponding collateral balances. The table only lists collateral that was identified and pledged by borrowers with outstanding credit products at December 31, 2019,2020, and therefore does not include all assets against which we have liens via our security agreements and Uniform Commercial Code filings ($ amounts in millions).
Collateral Types
Collateral Status# of Borrowers1st lien ResidentialORERC/CFISecurities/DeliveryTotal Collateral
Lendable Value (1)
Credit Outstanding (2)
Blanket64  $6,878  $3,556  $—  $10,434  $6,668  $2,617  
Specific listings76  22,458  4,073  1,387  27,918  21,248  9,366  
Possession28  5,981  12,581  8,276  26,838  19,589  15,411  
Hybrid (3)
30  9,363  3,388  2,027  14,778  10,327  5,327  
Total198  $44,680  $23,598  $11,690  $79,968  $57,832  $32,721  

Collateral Types
Collateral Status# of Borrowers1st lien ResidentialORERC/CFISecurities/DeliveryTotal Collateral
Lendable Value (1)
Credit Outstanding (2)
Blanket59 $6,445 $4,400 $— $10,845 $6,924 $2,542 
Specific listings68 23,722 4,145 1,748 29,615 21,987 9,470 
Possession26 5,529 13,052 7,423 26,004 18,730 13,245 
Hybrid (3)
24 7,261 5,468 2,045 14,774 10,259 5,789 
Total177 $42,957 $27,065 $11,216 $81,238 $57,900 $31,046 

(1)     Lendable Value is the borrowing capacity, based upon collateral pledged after a market value has been estimated (excluding blanket-pledged collateral) and an over-collateralization requirement has been applied.
(2)     Credit outstanding includes advances (at par value), lines of credit used, and standby letters of credit.
(3)     Hybrid collateral status is a combination of any of the others: blanket, specific listings and possession.

Collateral Review and Monitoring. Our agreements with borrowers allow us, at any time and in our sole discretion, to require substitution of collateral, adjust the over-collateralization requirements applied to collateral, or refuse to make extensions of credit against any collateral. We also may require borrowers to pledge additional collateral regardless of whether the collateral would be eligible to originate a new extension of credit. Our agreements with our borrowers also afford us the right, in our sole discretion, to declare any borrower to be in default if we deem our Bank to be inadequately secured.

Credit services management continually monitors members' collateral status and may require a member to change its collateral status based upon deteriorating financial performance, results of on-site collateral verification reviews, or a high level of borrowings as a percentage of its assets. The blanket lien created by the security agreement remains in place regardless of a member's collateral status.

The Bank conducts regular on-sitecollateral verification reviews of loan collateral pledged by members to confirm the existence of the pledged collateral, confirm that the collateral conforms to our eligibility requirements, and score the collateral for concentration and credit risk. Based on the results of such on-sitecollateral verification reviews, a member may have its over-collateralization requirements adjusted, limitations may be placed on the amount of certain asset types accepted as collateral or, in some cases, the member may be changed to a more stringent collateral status. We may conduct a review of any borrower's collateral at any time.

Credit Review and Monitoring. We monitor the financial condition of all member and non-member borrowers by reviewing certain available financial data, such as regulatory call reports filed by depository institution borrowers, regulatory financial statements filed with the appropriate state insurance department by insurance company borrowers, SEC filings, and rating agency reports, to ensure that potentially troubled institutions are identified as soon as possible. In addition, we have the ability to obtain borrowers' regulatory examination reports and, when appropriate, may contact borrowers' management teams to discuss performance and business strategies. We analyze this information on a regular basis and use it to determine the appropriate collateral status for a borrower.

77
Table of Contents


We use models to assign a quarterly financial performance measure for all depository institution borrowers. This measure, combined with other credit monitoring tools and the level of a member's usage of credit products, determines the frequency and depth of underwriting analysis for these institutions.

70
Table of Contents


Investments. We are also exposed to credit risk through our investment portfolio. Our policies restrict the acquisition of investments to high-quality, short-term money market instruments and high-quality long-term securities.

Short-Term Investments. Our short-term investments typically include securities purchased under agreements to resell, which are secured by United States Treasuries or Agency MBS passthroughs.Treasuries. Although we are permitted to purchase these securities for terms of up to 275 days, most mature overnight. Our short-term investments can also include federal funds sold, which can be overnight or term placements of our funds. We place these funds with large, high-quality financial institutions with investment-grade long-term credit ratings on an unsecured basis for terms of up to 275 days. Our short-term investments also include interest-bearing demand deposit accounts which are commercial deposit accounts generally opened with large, high-quality domestic financial institutions. The funds within these accounts are available for withdrawal at any time during business hours.

We monitor counterparty creditworthiness, ratings, performance, and capital adequacy in an effort to mitigate unsecured credit risk on the short-term investments, with an emphasis on the potential impacts of changes in global economic conditions. As a result, we may limit or suspend exposure to certain counterparties.

Finance Agency regulations include limits on the amount of unsecured credit we may extend to a private counterparty or to a group of affiliated counterparties. As of December 31, 2019, this limit was based on a percentage of eligible regulatory capital and the counterparty's long-term NRSRO credit rating.rating. Under those regulations, (i) the level of eligible regulatory capital is determined as the lesser of our total regulatory capital or the eligible amount of regulatory capital of the counterparty; (ii) the eligible amount of regulatory capital is then multiplied by a stated percentage; and (iii) the percentage that we may offer for term extensions of unsecured credit ranges from 1% to 15% based on the counterparty's NRSRO credit rating. The calculation of term extensions of unsecured credit includes on-balance sheet transactions, off-balance sheet commitments and derivative transactions.

The regulations were amended effective January 1, 2020 and now require, among other things, that we calculate credit risk capital charges and unsecured credit limits based on our own internal rating methodology, rather than on NRSRO ratings. For more information on these amendments, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Recent Accounting and Regulatory Developments - Legislative and Regulatory Developments.

The Finance Agency regulation also permits us to extend additional unsecured credit for overnight federal funds sold up to a total unsecured exposure to a single counterparty of 2% to 30% of the eligible amount of regulatory capital, based on the counterparty's credit rating.

Additionally, we are prohibited by Finance Agency regulation from investing in financial instruments issued by non-United States entities other than those issued by United States branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks. Our unsecured credit exposures to United States branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks include the risk that, as a result of political or economic conditions in a country, the counterparty may be unable to meet its contractual repayment obligations.obligations. During the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, our unsecured investment credit exposure to United States branches and agency offices of foreign commercial banks was limited to federal funds sold. Our unsecured credit exposures to domestic counterparties and United States subsidiaries of foreign commercial banks include the risk that these counterparties have extended credit to foreign counterparties.


78
Table of Contents


The following table presents the unsecured investment credit exposure to private counterparties, categorized by the domicile of the counterparty's ultimate parent, based on the lowest of the counterparty's NRSRO long-term credit ratings, stated in terms of the S&P equivalent. The table does not reflect the foreign sovereign government's credit rating ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019AAATotal
Domestic$—  $1,949  $1,949  
Canada—  320  320  
Australia1,090  —  1,090  
Total unsecured credit exposure$1,090  $2,269  $3,359  

December 31, 2020AAATotal
Domestic$— $100 $100 
Australia100 615 715 
Netherlands— 500 500 
Total unsecured credit exposure$100 $1,215 $1,315 

Trading Securities. Our liquidity portfolio includes U.S. Treasury securities, which are direct obligations of the U.S. government and are classified as trading securities.
71
Table of Contents


Other Investment Securities. Our long-term investments include MBS guaranteed by the housing GSEs (Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac), other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS (Ginnie Mae), and debentures issued by Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the TVA and the Federal Farm Credit Banks.

A Finance Agency regulation provides that the total amount of our investments in MBS and ABS, calculated using amortized historical cost, must not exceed 300% of our total regulatory capital, as of the day we purchase the securities, based on the capital amount most recently reported to the Finance Agency. At December 31, 2019,2020, these investments totaled 281% oftotaled 299.99% of total regulatory capital. Generally, our goal is to maintain these investments near the 300% limit in order to enhance earnings and capital for our members and diversify our revenue stream.


79
Table of Contents


The following table presents the carrying values of our investments, excluding accrued interest, grouped by credit rating and investment category. Applicable rating levels are determined using the lowest relevant long-term rating from S&P Moody's and Fitch Ratings, Inc.,Moody's, each stated in terms of the S&P equivalent. Rating modifiers are ignored when determining the applicable rating level for a given counterparty or investment. Amounts reported do not reflect any subsequent changes in ratings, outlook, or watch status ($ amounts in millions).
Below Below
Investment Investment
December 31, 2019AAAAAABBBGrade
Total
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020AAAAAABBBGrade
Total
Short-term investments:Short-term investments: Short-term investments: 
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits$—  $—  $809  $—  $—  $809  Interest-bearing deposits$$$100$$$100
Securities purchased under agreements to resellSecurities purchased under agreements to resell—  1,500  —  —  —  1,500  Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,5002,500
Federal funds soldFederal funds sold—  1,090  1,460  —  —  2,550  Federal funds sold1001,1151,215
Total short-term investmentsTotal short-term investments—  2,590  2,269  —  —  4,859  Total short-term investments2,6001,2153,815
Trading securities:Trading securities:Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligationsU.S. Treasury obligations—  5,017  —  —  —  5,017  U.S. Treasury obligations5,0955,095
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities—  5,017  —  —  —  5,017  Total trading securities5,0955,095
Other investment securities:Other investment securities:Other investment securities:
GSE and TVA debenturesGSE and TVA debentures—  3,927  —  —  —  3,927  GSE and TVA debentures3,5033,503
GSE MBSGSE MBS—  6,714  —  —  —  6,714  GSE MBS8,7208,720
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBSOther U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBS—  3,060  —  —  —  3,060  Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBS2,6232,623
Total other investment securitiesTotal other investment securities—  13,701  —  —  —  13,701  Total other investment securities14,84614,846
Total investments, carrying valueTotal investments, carrying value$—  $21,308  $2,269  $—  $—  $23,577  Total investments, carrying value$$22,541$1,215$$$23,756
Percentage of totalPercentage of total— %90 %10 %— %— %100 %Percentage of total— %95 %%— %— %100 %
December 31, 2018
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019
Short-term investments:Short-term investments: Short-term investments: 
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits$—  $ $1,210  $—  $—  $1,211  Interest-bearing deposits$$$809$$$809
Securities purchased under agreements to resellSecurities purchased under agreements to resell—  3,213  —  —  —  3,213  Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,5001,500
Federal funds soldFederal funds sold—  1,630  1,455  —  —  3,085  Federal funds sold1,0901,4602,550
Total short-term investmentsTotal short-term investments—  4,844  2,665  —  —  7,509  Total short-term investments2,5902,2694,859
Trading securities:Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligationsU.S. Treasury obligations5,0175,017
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities5,0175,017
Investment securitiesInvestment securitiesInvestment securities
GSE and TVA debenturesGSE and TVA debentures—  4,277  —  —  —  4,277  GSE and TVA debentures3,9273,927
GSE MBSGSE MBS—  5,632  —  —  —  5,632  GSE MBS6,7146,714
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBSOther U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBS—  3,469  —  —  —  3,469  Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed RMBS3,0603,060
Total investment securitiesTotal investment securities—  13,378  —  —  —  13,378  Total investment securities13,70113,701
Total investments, carrying valueTotal investments, carrying value$—  $18,222  $2,665  $—  $—  $20,887  Total investments, carrying value$$21,308$2,269$$$23,577
Percentage of totalPercentage of total— %87 %13 %— %— %100 %Percentage of total— %90 %10 %— %— %100 %

7280
Table of Contents


Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio.

MPP. We are exposed to credit risk on the loans purchased from our PFIs through the MPP. Each loan we purchase must meet the guidelines for our MPP or be specifically approved as an exception based on compensating factors. For example, the maximum LTV ratio for any conventional mortgage loan purchased is 95%, and the borrowers must meet certain minimum credit scores depending upon the type of loan or property.
 
Credit Enhancements. Credit enhancements for conventional loans include (in order of priority):

PMI (when applicable);
LRA; and
SMI (as applicable) purchased by the seller from a third-party provider naming us as the beneficiary.

PMI. For a conventional loan, PMI, if applicable, covers losses or exposure down to approximately an LTV ratio between 65%65% and 80% based upon the original appraisal, original LTV ratio, term, and amount of PMI coverage. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had PMI coverage on $1.8 billion$525 million or 18%7% of our conventional MPP mortgage loans, which included coverage of $0.7$3.8 million on seriously delinquent loans, i.e., 90 days or more past due or in the process of foreclosure, of $2.2$13.7 million.

LRA. We use either a "spread LRA" or a "fixed LRA" for credit enhancement. The spread LRA was used in combination with SMI for credit enhancement of conventional mortgage loans purchased under our original MPP, and the fixed LRA is used for credit enhancement of conventional mortgage loans purchased under Advantage MPP. At this time, substantially all of the additions are from Advantage MPP , and substantially all of the claims paid are from the original MPP.

The following table presents the changes in the LRA for original MPP and Advantage MPP ($ amounts in millions).
2019
LRA ActivityOriginalAdvantageTotal
Liability, beginning of year$ $167  $174  
Additions—  15  15  
Claims paid—  —  —  
Distributions to PFIs—  (2) (2) 
Liability, end of year$ $180  $187  

2020
LRA ActivityOriginalAdvantageTotal
Liability, beginning of year$$180 $187 
Additions— 24 24 
Claims paid— — — 
Distributions to PFIs(3)(1)(4)
Liability, end of year$$203 $207 

SMI. Losses that exceed available LRA funds are covered by SMI (for original MPP loans) up to a severity of approximately 50% of the original property value of the loan, depending on the SMI contract terms. We absorb any losses in excess of available LRA funds and SMI.

Our current SMI providers are Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation and Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation. For pools of loans acquired under the original MPP, we entered into the insurance contracts directly with the SMI providers, including a contract for each pool or aggregate pool. Pursuant to Finance Agency regulation, the PFI must be responsible for all expected credit losses on the mortgages sold to us. Therefore, the PFI was the purchaser of the SMI policy, and we are designated as the beneficiary. The premiums are the PFI's obligation. As an administrative convenience, we collect the SMI premiums from the monthly mortgage remittances received from the PFIs or their designated servicer and remit them to the SMI provider.

Credit Risk Exposure to SMI Providers. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we were the beneficiary of SMI coverage, under our original MPP, on conventional mortgage pools with a total UPB of $562$418 million. The lowest credit rating from S&P Moody's and Fitch Ratings, Inc.,Moody's stated in terms of the S&P equivalent, for each of our SMI companies is BBB+ for Mortgage Guaranty Insurance Corporation and BB+ for Genworth Mortgage Insurance Corporation. We evaluate the recoverability related to PMI and SMI for mortgage loans that we hold, including insurance companies placed under enhanced supervision of state regulators. We also evaluate the recoverability of outstanding receivables from our PMI and SMI providers related to outstanding and unpaid claims.

SeeSee Notes to Financial Statements - Note 76 - AllowanceMortgage Loans Held for Credit LossesPortfolio for our estimates of recovery associated with the expected amount of our claims for all providers of these policies in determining our allowance for loancredit losses.    


7381
Table of Contents


MPF Program. Credit risk arising from AMA activities under our participation in mortgage loans originated under the MPF Program falls into three categories: (i) the risk of credit losses arising from our FLA and last loss positions; (ii) the risk that a PFI will not perform as promised with respect to its loss position provided through its CE Obligations on mortgage loan pools; and (iii) the risk that a third-party insurer (obligated under PMI arrangements) will fail to perform as expected. Should a PMI third-party insurer fail to perform, our credit risk exposure would increase because our FLA is the next layer to absorb credit losses on mortgage loan pools.

Credit Enhancements. Our management of credit risk in the MPF Program considers the several layers of loss protection that are defined in agreements among the FHLBank of Topeka and its PFIs. The availability of loss protection may differ slightly among MPF products. Our loss protection consists of the following loss layers, in order of priority:

(i) Borrower equity;
(ii) PMI (when applicable);
(iii) FLA, which functions as a tracking mechanism for determining our potential loss exposure under each pool prior to the PFI’s CE Obligation; and
(iv) CE Obligation, which absorbs losses in excess of the FLA in order to limit our loss exposure to that of an investor in an MBS deemed to be investment-grade.

PMI. For a conventional loan, PMI, if applicable, covers losses or exposure down to approximately an LTV ratio between 65% and 80% based upon the original appraisal, original LTV ratio, term, and amount of PMI coverage. As of December 31, 2019,2020, we had PMI coverage on $19$14 million or 11% of our conventional MPF Program mortgage loans. 

FLA and CE Obligation. If losses occur in a pool, these losses will either be: (i) recovered through the withholding of future performance-based CE fees from the PFI or (ii) absorbed by us in the FLA. As of December 31, 2019,2020, our exposure under the FLA totaled $4 million, and CE obligations available to cover losses in excess of the FLA were $2 million. PFIs must fully collateralize their CE Obligation with assets considered acceptable by the FHLBank of Topeka.


74
Table of Contents


MPP and MPF Program Loan Characteristics. Two indicators of credit quality at origination are LTV ratios and credit scores provided by FICO®. FICO® provides a commonly used measure to assess a borrower’s credit quality, with scores ranging from a low of 300 to a high of 850. The combination of a lower FICO® score and a higher LTV ratio is a key driver of potential mortgage delinquencies and defaults.


82
Table of Contents


The following tables present these two characteristics at origination of our MPP and MPF Program conventional loan portfolios as a percentage of the UPB outstanding ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019
% of UPB Outstanding
FICO® SCORE (1)
UPBCurrentPast Due 30-59 DaysPast Due 60-89 DaysPast Due
90 Days
or More
619 or less  $ 85.4 %13.3 %1.3 %— %
620-65955  90.0 %4.3 %2.6 %3.1 %
660-699726  97.9 %1.5 %0.3 %0.3 %
700-7392,098  98.9 %0.8 %0.1 %0.2 %
740 or higher7,382  99.7 %0.2 %0.1 %— %
Total$10,263  99.4 %0.4 %0.1 %0.1 %

December 31, 2020
% of UPB Outstanding
FICO® SCORE (1)
UPBCurrentPast Due 30-59 DaysPast Due 60-89 DaysPast Due
90 Days
or More
619 or less$83.2 %15.9 %0.9 %— %
620-65943 88.6 %4.2 %1.2 %6.0 %
660-699602 95.4 %0.5 %0.9 %3.2 %
700-7391,657 97.6 %0.4 %0.3 %1.7 %
740 or higher5,765 99.0 %0.1 %0.1 %0.8 %
Total$8,069 98.4 %0.2 %0.2 %1.2 %

(1)     Represents the FICO® score at origination of the lowest scoring borrower for the related loan.

For borrowers in our conventional loan portfolio at December 31, 2019,2020, 99% of the borrowers had FICO® scores greater than 660 at origination and the weighted average FICO® score at origination was 761.

LTV Ratio (1)
December 31, 20192020
< = 60%1416 %
> 60% to 70%1516 %
> 70% to 80%5452 %
> 80% to 90% (2)
1211 %
> 90% (2)
%
Total100 %

(1)     At origination.
(2)     These conventional loans were required to have PMI at origination.

For borrowers in our conventional loan portfolio at December 31, 20192020, 83%84% of the borrowers had an LTV ratio of 80% or lower at origination and the weighted average LTV ratio at origination was 74%73%.

We believe these two measures indicate that these loans have a low risk of default.

We do not knowingly purchase any loan that violates the terms of our Anti-Predatory Lending Policy. In addition, we require our members to warrant to us that all of the loans sold to us are in compliance with all applicable laws, including prohibitions on anti-predatory lending.

MPP and MPF Program Loan Concentration. The following table presents the percentage of UPB of MPP and MPF Program conventional loans outstanding at December 31, 20192020 for the five largest state concentrations. 

By StateDecember 31, 20192020
Indiana40 %
Michigan31 %
Michigan30 %
California117 %
Virginia32 %
Colorado32 %
All others2218 %
Total100 %



75
83
Table of Contents


MPP and MPF Program Credit Performance. The UPB of our MPP and MPF Program conventional and FHA loans 90 days or more past due and accruing interest, non-accrual loans and TDRs, along with the allowance for loan losses, are presented in the table below ($ amounts in millions).
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 20192018201720162015
Past Due, Non-Accrual and Restructured Loans
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest$13  $14  $19  $27  $34  
Non-accrual loans (1) (2)
     
TDRs (3)
12  12  14  14  15  
Allowance for Loan Losses on Mortgage Loans (4)
Allowance for loan losses, beginning of the year$ $ $ $ $ 
Charge-offs—  —  —  —  (1) 
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses(1) —  —  —  (1) 
Allowance for loan losses, end of the year$—  $ $ $ $ 
As of and for the Years Ended December 31,
 20202019201820172016
Past Due, Non-Accrual and Restructured Loans
Past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest (1)
$44 $13 $14 $19 $27 
Non-accrual loans (1) (2) (3)
86 
TDRs (4) (5)
11 12 12 14 14 
Allowance for Credit Losses on Mortgage Loans (6)
Allowance for credit losses, beginning of the year$— $$$$
Charge-offs— — — — — 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— (1)— — — 
Allowance for credit losses, end of the year$— $— $$$

(1)     The Bank continues to apply its existing accounting policies for past due, non-accrual, and charge-offs for COVID-19-related loan modifications considered to be informal, i.e. the legal terms of the loan were not changed. As of December 31, 2020, the total UPB of our conventional mortgage loans in informal, COVID-19-related forbearance past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest was $26 million.
(2)     Non-accrual loans are defined as conventional mortgage loans where either (i) the collection of interest or principal is doubtful, or (ii) interest or principal is past due for 90 days or more, except when the loan is well secured and in the process of collection (e.g., through credit enhancements and monthly servicer remittances on a scheduled/scheduled basis).At December 31, 2020,the total UPB of our non-accrual loans in informal, COVID-19-related forbearance was $59 million.
(2)  (3)The interest income shortfall on non-accrual loans was was $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, and less than $1$1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015.2016.
(3)  (4)     Represents TDRs that are still performing. TDRs related to mortgage loans are considered to have occurred when a concession is granted to the debtor related to the debtor's financial difficulties that would not otherwise be considered for economic or legal reasons. We do not participate in government-sponsored loan modification programs.
(4)  (5)    Due to the temporary relief from the accounting and reporting requirements for TDRs provided by the CARES Act and further clarified by the Interagency Statement, we have excluded all qualifying COVID-19-related loan modifications considered to be formal, i.e., the legal terms of the loan were changed, from TDR classification and accounting. As of December 31, 2020, we had $12 million of conventional mortgage loans outstanding that were formally modified due to COVID-19 hardships that were not reported as TDRs. In addition, as of December 31, 2020, we had $112 million of conventional mortgage loans outstanding that were informally modified due to COVID-19 hardships, none of which were determined to be TDRs.
(6)     At December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015,2016, our allowance for loancredit losses included an estimate of probableexpected loss on $1 million, $1 million, $2 million, $2 million, $3 million, and $5$3 million, respectively, of principal previously paid in full by the servicers that remained subject to potential claims by those servicers for any losses resulting from past or future liquidations of the underlying properties.

The serious delinquency rate for government-guaranteed or -insured mortgages was 0.94%3.36% at December 31, 2019,2020, compared to 0.45%0.94% at December 31, 2018.2019. We rely on insurance provided by the FHA, which generally provides coverage for 100% of the principal balance of the underlying mortgage loan and defaulted interestinterest at the debenture rate. However, we would receive defaulted interest at the contractual rate from the servicer. The serious delinquency rate for conventional mortgages was 0.10%1.14% at December 31, 2019,2020, compared to 0.12%0.10% at December 31, 2018.2019. Both rates were below the national serious delinquency rate.
Although we establish credit enhancements in each mortgage pool purchased under our original MPP at thethe time of the pool's origination that are sufficient to absorb loan losses up to approximately 50% of the property's original value (subject, in certain cases, to an aggregate stop-loss provision in the SMI policy), the magnitude of the declines in home prices and increases in the time to complete foreclosures in past years resulted in losses in some of the mortgage pools that have exhausted the LRA; however, credit enhancement support is still available through the SMI coverage. Some of our mortgage pools have loans originated in states and localities (e.g., Florida, Illinois, Pennsylvania, New Jersey and New York) that have had the most lengthy foreclosure processes. We purchased most of these loan pools from institutions that are no longer members of our Bank and, thus, have stopped selling mortgage loans to us. When a mortgage pool's credit enhancements are exhausted, we will incur any additional loan losses in that pool.

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, we authorized the suspension of foreclosures and evictions (with certain exceptions) through March 31, 2021 which will extend the time to complete foreclosures across the portfolio.
84
Table of Contents


Overall, the trends in the credit performance of our mortgage loans held for portfolio over the last five years have been positive.
76
TableThere has been an increase in the overall delinquency rate due to payment forbearances as a result of Contentsthe COVID-19 pandemic. Absent the forbearance loans, the delinquency rate and loan performance has remained strong.


Derivatives. The Dodd-Frank Act provides statutory and regulatory requirements for derivatives transactions, including those we use to hedge our interest rate and other risks. We are required to clear certain interest-rate swaps that fall within the scope of the first mandatory clearing determination. Certain derivatives designated by the CFTC as "made available to trade" are required to be executed on a swap execution facility.

Our over-the-counter derivative transactions are either (i) held with a counterparty (uncleared derivatives) or (ii) cleared through a Futures Commission Merchant (i.e., clearing agent) with a clearinghouse (cleared derivatives).
Uncleared Derivatives. We are subject to credit risk due to the potential non-performance by the counterparties to our uncleared derivative transactions. We require collateral agreements with our uncleared derivative counterparties. The exposure thresholds above which collateral must be delivered vary; the threshold is zero in some cases.
Cleared Derivatives. We are subject to credit risk due to the potential non-performance by the clearinghouse and clearing agent because we are required to post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent, on behalf of the clearinghouse, which exposes us to institutional credit risk if either the clearing agent or the clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations. Collateral is required to be posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives to mitigate each counterparty's credit risk. In addition, all derivative transactions are subject to mandatory reporting and record-keeping requirements.
The contractual or notional amount of derivative transactions reflects the extent of our participation in the various classes of financial instruments. Our credit risk with respect to derivative transactions is the estimated cost of replacing the derivative positions if there is a default, minus the value of any related collateral. In determining credit risk, we consider accrued interest receivables and payables as well as the requirements to net assets and liabilities. For more information, see Notes to Financial Statements - Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities.

The following table presents key information on derivative positions with counterparties on a settlement date basis using the lowestlower credit ratingsrating from S&P and Moody's, stated in terms of the S&P equivalent ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019
Notional
Amount
Net Estimated
Fair Value
Before Collateral
Cash Collateral
Pledged To (From)
Counterparty
Net Credit
Exposure
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020
Notional
Amount
Net Estimated
Fair Value
Before Collateral
Cash Collateral
Pledged To (From)
Counterparty
Net Credit
Exposure
Non-member counterparties:Non-member counterparties:Non-member counterparties:
Asset positions with credit exposureAsset positions with credit exposureAsset positions with credit exposure
Cleared derivatives (1)
Cleared derivatives (1)
$26,104  $ $185  $193  
Cleared derivatives (1)
$15,028 $$171 $172 
Liability positions with credit exposureLiability positions with credit exposureLiability positions with credit exposure
Uncleared derivatives - AA815  (3)   
Uncleared derivatives - A20,980  (261) 275  14  
Cleared derivatives (1)
Cleared derivatives (1)
18,962 (2)112 110 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to non-member counterpartiesTotal derivative positions with credit exposure to non-member counterparties47,899  (256) 464  208  Total derivative positions with credit exposure to non-member counterparties33,990 (1)283 282 
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to member institutions (2)
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to member institutions (2)
57  —  —  —  
Total derivative positions with credit exposure to member institutions (2)
178 — 
Subtotal - derivative positions with credit exposureSubtotal - derivative positions with credit exposure47,956  $(256) $464  $208  Subtotal - derivative positions with credit exposure34,168 $— $283 $283 
Derivative positions without credit exposureDerivative positions without credit exposure2,446  Derivative positions without credit exposure16,224 
Total derivative positionsTotal derivative positions$50,402  Total derivative positions$50,392 

(1)     Represents derivative transactions cleared by two clearinghouses (one rated AA- and the other unrated).
(2)     Includes MDCs from member institutions under our MPP.

77
Table of Contents


AHP. Our AHP requires members and project sponsors to make commitments with respect to the usage of the AHP grants to assist very low-, low-, and moderate-income families, as defined by regulation. If these commitments are not met, we may have an obligation to recapture these funds from the member or project sponsor to replenish the AHP fund. This credit exposure is addressed in part by evaluating project feasibility at the time of an award and the member’s ongoing monitoring of AHP projects.
85
Table of Contents


Liquidity Risk Management. The primary objectives of liquidity risk management are to maintain the ability to meet obligations as they come due and to meet the credit needs of our member borrowers in a timely and cost-efficient manner. We routinely monitor the sources of cash available to meet liquidity needs and use various tests and guidelines to manage our liquidity risk.

Daily projections of required liquidity are prepared to help us maintain adequate funding for our operations. Operational liquidity levels are determined assuming sources of cash from both the FHLBank System's ongoing access to the capital markets and our holding of liquid assets to meet operational requirements in the normal course of business. Contingent liquidity levels are determined based upon the assumption of an inability to readily access the capital markets for a period of 20 business days. These analyses include projections of cash flows and funding needs, targeted funding terms, and various funding alternatives for achieving those terms. A contingency plan allows us to maintain sufficient liquidity in the event of operational disruptions at our Bank, at the Office of Finance, or in the capital markets.

For more information on liquidity management, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Liquidity and Capital Resources - Liquidity.

Operational Risk Management. Operational risk is the risk of loss resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and systems, or from external events. Our management has established policies, procedures, and controls and acquired insurance coverage to mitigate operational risk. Our Internal Audit department, which reports directly to the Audit Committee of the board of directors, regularly monitors our adherence to established policies, procedures, applicable regulatory requirements and best practices.

Our enterprise risk management function and business units complete a comprehensive annual risk and control self-assessment that reinforces our focus on maintaining strong internal controls by identifying significant inherent risks and the mitigating internal controls in order for the residual risks to be assessed and the appropriate strategy designed to accept, transfer, avoid or mitigate such risks. The risk assessment process provides management and the board of directors with a detailed and transparent view of our identified risks and related internal control structure.

We use various financial models to quantify financial risks and analyze potential strategies. We maintain a model risk management program that includes a validation program intended to mitigate the risk of loss resulting from model errors or the incorrect use or application of model output, which could potentially lead to inappropriate business or operational decisions.

Our operations rely on the secure processing, storage and transmission of sensitive/confidential and other information in our computer systems, software and networks. As a result, our Cyber Risk ManagementInformation Security Program is designed to protect our information assets, information systems and sensitive data from internal, external, vendor and third party cyber risks, including due diligence, risk assessments, and ongoing monitoring of critical vendors by our Vendor Management Office. The Cyber Risk ManagementInformation Security Program includes processes for monitoring existing, emerging and imminent threats as well as cyber attacks impacting our industry in order to develop appropriate risk management strategies. Protective securityInformation Security controls detective controls,designed to protect and responsive controlsdetect are in place, for critical infrastructure, systemsincluding procedures to respond to and services.mitigate the consequences of security incidents. Periodically, we engage external third parties to assess our Cyber Risk ManagementInformation Security Program and perform testing to validate the effectiveness of the program.controls.

In order to ensure our ongoing ability to provide liquidity and service to our members, we have business continuity plans designed to restore critical business processes and systems in the event of a business interruption. We operate both a business resumption center and a disaster recovery data center, at separate locations, with the objective of being able to fully recover all critical activities in a timely manner. Both facilities are subject to periodic testing to demonstrate the Bank's resiliency in the event of a disaster. In addition, all Bank staff now have the capabilities to work remotely. We also have a back-up agreement in place with the FHLBank of Cincinnati in the event critical business operations at the Bank's primary and back-up facilities are inoperable.

We have insurance coverage for cybersecurity, employee fraud, forgery and wrongdoing, as well as Directors' and Officers' liability coverage that provides protection for claims alleging breach of duty, misappropriation of funds, neglect, acts of omission, employment practices, and fiduciary liability. We also have property, casualty, computer equipment, automobile, and other various types of insurance coverage. We complete periodic reviews to ensure the Bank maintains all insurance coverages at commercially appropriate levels.


78
86
Table of Contents


Business Risk Management. Business risk is the risk of an adverse impact on profitability resulting from external factors that may occur in both the short and long term. Business risk includes economic, political, strategic, reputation, and/legislative and regulatory developments or regulatory events that are beyond our control. Our board of directors and management seek to mitigate these risks by, among other actions, maintaining an open and constructive dialogue with regulators, providing input on potential legislation, conducting long-term strategic planning and continually monitoring general economic conditions and the external environment.

Our financial strategies are generally designed to enable us to safely expand and contract our assets, liabilities, and
capital in response to changes in our member base and in our members' credit needs. Our capital generally grows
when members are required to purchase additional capital stock as they increase their advances borrowings or other business
activities with us. We may also repurchase excess capital stock from our members as business activities with them decline. In addition, in order to meet internally established thresholds or to meet our regulatory capital requirement, we, at the discretion of our board of directors, could undertake capital preservation initiatives such as: (i) voluntarily reducing or eliminating dividend payments; (ii) suspending excess capital stock repurchases; or (iii) raising capital stock holding requirements for our members.

Replacement of the LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate. In July 2017, the Financial Conduct Authority ("FCA"), a regulator of financial services firms and financial markets in the UK, announced that it will plan for a phase-out of regulatory oversight of LIBOR interest rate indices. The FCA indicated that it will cease persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021, and that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis cannot and will not be guaranteed after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee has proposed SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR rates in April 2018.

Most of our advances, investments, CO bonds, derivative assets, derivative liabilities, and related collateral are indexed to LIBOR. Some of these assets and liabilities and related collateral have maturity dates that extend beyond 2021. As a result, we are evaluating the potential impact of the replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate, including the possibility of SOFR as the dominant replacement on an ongoing basis.

We have also developed an evolving transition plan that will change with market developments and member needs. The key components of our LIBOR replacement plan are: exposure, fallback language, information technology systems preparation, and balance sheet strategy. We have assessed our current exposure to LIBOR including completing an inventory of all financial instruments impacted and identifying financial instruments and contracts that may require adding or adjusting fallback language. We are assessing our operational readiness including potential effects on core Bank systems and replacing LIBOR references in policies and procedures. From a balance sheet management perspective, we continue to participate in the issuance of SOFR-indexed debt. In addition, in accordance with the Supervisory Letter issued by the Finance Agency to the FHLBanks, we have ceased purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. We have also suspended the issuance of LIBOR-indexed debt with maturities beyond 2021. However, until March 31, 2020, we will continue to issue fixed-rate debt with maturities beyond 2021 that are hedged with LIBOR-indexed interest-rate swaps. Beginning March 31, 2020, we will no longer enter into derivatives with swaps, caps, or floors indexed to LIBOR that terminate after December 31, 2021. Further, beginning March 31, 2020, we expect to suspend transactions in certain structured advances and advances with terms directly linked to LIBOR that mature after December 31, 2021. We are also revising our members’ collateral reporting requirements to distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral that matures after December 31, 2021. Finally, we have implemented OIS as an alternative interest rate hedging strategy for certain financial instruments.



79
Table of Contents


The following table presents our LIBOR-rate indexed financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2019 by year of maturity ($ amounts in millions).
Year of Maturity
LIBOR-Indexed Financial Instruments2020 2021 2022 and thereafterTotal
Assets:
Advances, par value (1)
$178  $311  $3,841  $4,330  
Mortgage-backed securities, par value (2)
12  —  4,437  4,449  
Total$190  $311  $8,278  $8,779  
Interest-rate swaps - receive leg, notional:
Cleared$4,364  $1,871  $7,087  $13,322  
Uncleared279  117  10,814  11,210  
Total$4,643  $1,988  $17,901  $24,532  
Liabilities:
CO bonds, par value (2)
$10,235  $1,050  $—  $11,285  
Interest-rate swaps - pay leg, notional:
Cleared$4,520  $849  $234  $5,603  
Uncleared2,737  2,445  6,248  11,430  
Total$7,257  $3,294  $6,482  $17,033  

(1) Year of maturity on our advances is based on redemption term.
(2) Year of maturity on our MBS and CO bonds is based on contractual maturity. The actual maturities on MBS will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.

For more information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors - Changes to or Replacement of the LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations.





80
Table of Contents


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

As used in this Item, unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "we," "us," "our", and "Bank" refer to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis or its management. We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

Market risk is the risk that the market value or estimated fair value of our overall portfolio of assets and liabilities, including derivatives, or our net earnings will decline as a result of changes in interest rates or financial market volatility. Market risk includes the risks related to:

movements in interest rates over time;
changes in mortgage prepayment speeds over time;
advance prepayments;
actual and implied interest-rate volatility;
the change in the relationship between short-term and long-term interest rates (i.e., the slope of the consolidated obligation and LIBOR yield curves);
the change in the relationship of FHLBank System debt spreads to relevant indices primarily LIBOR (commonly referred to as "basis" risk); and
the change in the relationship between fixed rates and variable rates.

The goal of market risk management is to preserve our financial strength at all times, including during periods of significant market volatility and across a wide range of possible interest-rate scenarios. We regularly assess our exposure to changes in interest rates using a diverse set of analyses and measures. As appropriate, we may rebalance our portfolio to help attain our risk management objectives.

Our general approach toward managing interest-rate risk is to acquire and maintain a portfolio of assets and liabilities that, together with their associated hedges, limit our expected interest-rate sensitivity to within our specified tolerances. Additionally, in order to manage the exposure to mortgage contraction (prepayment) and extension risk, the outstanding balance of mortgage loans is limited to a proportion of total assets and the total amount of our investments in MBS must not exceed 300% of our total regulatory capital on the day of purchase. Derivative financial instruments, primarily interest-rate swaps, are frequently employed to hedge the interest-rate risk and/or embedded option risk on advances, debt, GSE debentures and Agency MBS held as investments.

The prepayment option on an advance can create interest-rate risk. If a member prepays an advance, we could suffer lower future income if the principal portion of the prepaid advance is reinvested in lower yielding assets that continue to be funded by higher cost debt. To protect against this risk, we charge a prepayment fee, thereby substantially reducing market risk.risk associated with the prepayment of an advance.


87
Table of Contents


We have significant investments in mortgage loans and MBS. The prepayment options embedded in mortgages can result in extensions or contractions in the expected weighted average life of these investments, depending on changes in interest rates and other economic factors. We primarily manage the interest-rate and prepayment risk associated with mortgages through debt issuance, which includes both callable and non-callable debt, to achieve cash-flow patterns and liability durations similar to those expected on the mortgage portfolios. Due to the use of call options and lockouts, and by selecting appropriate maturity sectors, callable debt provides an element of protection for the prepayment risk in the mortgage portfolios. The durationaverage life of callable debt, like that of a mortgage, shortens when interest rates decrease and lengthens when interest rates increase.

81
Table of Contents


Significant resources, including analytical computer models and an experienced professional staff, are devoted to properly measuring the level of interest-rate risk in the balance sheet, thus allowing us to monitor the risk against policy and regulatory limits. We use asset and liability models to calculate market values under alternative interest-rate scenarios. The models analyze our financial instruments, including derivatives, using broadly accepted algorithms with consistent and appropriate behavioral assumptions, market prices, market data (such as rates, volatility, etc.) and current position data. On at least an annual basis, we review the major assumptions and methodologies used in the models, including discounting curves, spreads for discounting, and prepayment assumptions.

Types of Key Market Risks

Our market risk results from various factors, such as:

Interest Rates - level of interest rates and parallel and non-parallel shifts in the yield curve;
Basis Risk - the risk that changes to one interest-rate index will not perfectly offset changes to another interest-rate index;
Volatility - varying values of assets or liabilities with embedded options, such as mortgages and callable bonds, created by the changing expectations of the magnitude or frequency of changes in interest rates;
Option-Adjusted SpreadEmbedded Options - an estimate of the incremental yield spread between a particular financial instrument (i.e., an advance, investment or derivative contract) and a benchmark yield (e,g,, LIBOR). This includes consideration of potential variability in the instrument's cash flows of financial instruments (i.e., advance, investment or derivative) resulting from any options embedded in the instrument,instruments, such as prepayment options;options in mortgages and callable bonds; and
Prepayment Speeds - expected levels of principal payments on mortgage loans held in a portfolio or supporting an MBS, variations from which alter their cash flows, yields, and values, particularly in cases where the loans or MBS are acquired at a premium or discount.

Measuring Market Risks
 
To evaluate market risk, we utilize multiple risk measurements, including duration of equity, duration gap, convexity, VaR, earnings at risk, and changes in MVE. Periodically, we conduct stress tests to measure and analyze the effects that extreme movements in the level of interest rates and the shape of the yield curve would have on our risk position.

Market Risk-Based Capital Requirement. We are subject to the Finance Agency's risk-based capital regulations. This regulatory framework requires the maintenance of sufficient permanent capital to meet the combined credit risk, market risk, and operations risk components. The market risk-based capital component is the sum of two factors. The first factor is the market value of the portfolio at risk from movements in interest rates that could occur during times of market stress. This estimation is accomplished through an internal VaR-based modeling approach that was approved by the Finance Board before the implementation of our capital plan. 

The VaR approach used for calculating the first factor is primarily based upon historical simulation methodology. The estimation incorporates scenarios that reflect interest-rate shifts, interest-rate volatility, and changes in the shape of the yield curve. TheseBeginning in 2020, these observations are based on historical information from 1992 to the present. Previously, these observations were based on historical information from 1978 to the present. WhenBeginning in 2020, when calculating the risk-based capital requirement, the VaR comprising the first factor of the market risk component is defined as the average of the five worst-case scenarios. Previously, it was calculated using the potential dollar loss from adverse market movements, for a holding period of 120 business days, with a 99% confidence interval, based on those historical prices and market rates. The table below presents the VaR ($ amounts in millions).
Years EndedYears EndedVaRHighLowAverageYears EndedVaRHighLowAverage
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020$327 $327 $230 $279 
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019$198  $326  $176  $249  December 31, 2019198 326 176 249 
December 31, 2018298  381  298  336  

88
Table of Contents


The second factor is the amount, if any, by which the current market value of total regulatory capital is less than 85% of the book value of total regulatory capital.

82
Table of Contents


Duration of Equity. Duration of equity is a measure of interest-rate risk and is one of the primary metrics used to manage our market risk exposure. It is ana linear estimate of the percentage change in our MVE that could be caused by a 100 bps parallel upward or downward shift in the interest-rate curves. We value our portfolios using the LIBOR curve, the OIS curve, the consolidated obligation curve, the SOFR curve or external prices. The market value and interest-rate sensitivity of each asset, liability, and off-balance sheet position is determined to compute our duration of equity. We calculate duration of equity using the interest-rate curve as of the date of calculation and for defined interest rate shock scenarios, including scenarios for which the interest-rate curve is 100 bps and 200 bps higher or lower than the base level. Our board of directors determines acceptable ranges for duration of equity for the base scenario. A negative duration of equity suggests adverse exposure to falling rates and a favorable response to rising rates, while a positive duration suggests adverse exposure to rising rates and a favorable response to falling rates.

The Bank's duration of equity is impacted by the convexity of its financial instruments. Convexity measures the rate of change of duration, or curvature, as a function of interest-rate changes. Measurement of convexity is important because of the optionality embedded in the mortgage assets and callable debt liabilities. The mortgage assets exhibit negative convexity due to embedded prepayment options. Callable debt liabilities exhibit positive convexity due to embedded options that we can exercise to redeem the debt prior to maturity. Management routinely reviews the net convexity exposure and considers it when developing funding and hedging strategies for the acquisition of mortgage-based assets. A primary strategy for managing convexity risk arising from our mortgage portfolio is the issuance of callable debt. The negative convexity of the mortgage assets tends to be partially offset by the positive convexity contributed by underlying callable debt liabilities.

Market Value of Equity. MVE represents the difference between the estimated market value of total assets and the estimated market value of total liabilities, including any off-balance sheet positions. It measures, in present value terms, the long-term economic value of current capital and the long-term level and volatility of net interest income.

We also monitor the sensitivities of MVE to potential interest-rate scenarios. We measure potential changes in the market value to book value of equity based on the current month-end level of rates versus large parallel rate shifts in rates. Our board of directors determines acceptable ranges for the change in MVE for 200100 bps parallel upward or downward shift in the interest-rate curves.

Key Metrics. The following table presents certain market and interest-rate metrics under different interest-rate scenarios ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019
Down 200 (1)
Down 100 (1)
BaseUp 100Up 200
MVE$3,353  $3,285  $3,237  $3,175  $3,171  
Percent change in MVE from base3.6 %1.5 %%(1.9)%(2.0)%
MVE/book value of equity96.4 %94.4 %93.0 %91.2 %91.1 %
Duration of equity (2)
2.00.52.40.50.5

December 31, 2020
Down 200 (1)
Down 100 (1)
BaseUp 100Up 200
MVE$3,621 $3,605 $3,559 $3,579 $3,590 
Percent change in MVE from base1.8 %1.3 %%0.6 %0.9 %
MVE/book value of equity97.8 %97.4 %96.2 %96.7 %97.0 %
Duration of equity0.80.7(0.7)0.4

December 31, 2018 (3)
Down 200 (1)
Down 100 (1)
BaseUp 100Up 200
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019
Down 200 (2)
Down 100 (1)
BaseUp 100Up 200
MVEMVE$3,240  $3,191  $3,120  $3,024  $2,995  MVE$3,353 $3,285 $3,237 $3,175 $3,171 
Percent change in MVE from basePercent change in MVE from base3.8 %2.3 %%(3.1)%(4.0)%Percent change in MVE from base3.6 %1.5 %%(1.9)%(2.0)%
MVE/book value of equityMVE/book value of equity100.7 %99.1 %96.9 %93.9 %93.0 %MVE/book value of equity96.4 %94.4 %93.0 %91.2 %91.1 %
Duration of equity (2)
Duration of equity (2)
1.41.72.92.5(0.3)
Duration of equity (2)
2.00.52.40.50.5

(1)     Given the low interest rates in the short-to-medium term points of the yield curves, downward rate shocks are constrained to prevent rates from becoming negative.
(2) We use interest-rate shocks in 50 bps increments to determine duration of equity.
(3)  Metrics previously presented have been revised.

The changes in those key metrics from December 31, 20182019 resulted primarily from the change in market value of the Bank's assets and liabilities in response to changes in the market environment, changes in portfolio composition, and our hedging strategies.

We are in the process of refiningDuring 2020, we refined certain methodologies underlying the calculations of our key risk metrics. The changes to the methodologies are subject to either approval or non-objection by the Finance Agency. If implemented,metrics and the net impact of the changes on our metrics is expected to bewas slightly favorable.


8389
Table of Contents


Duration Gap. A related measure of interest-rate risk is duration gap, which is the difference between the estimated durations (market value sensitivity) of assets and liabilities. Duration gap measures the sensitivity of assets and liabilities to interest-rate changes. Duration generally indicates the expected change in an instrument's market value resulting from an increase or a decrease in interest rates. Higher duration numbers, whether positive or negative, indicate greater volatility of market value in response to changing interest rates. The base case duration gap was 0.08%0.01% and 0.09%0.08% at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, respectively.

As part of our overall interest-rate risk management process, we continue to evaluate strategies to manage interest-rate risk. Certain strategies, if implemented, could have an adverse impact on future earnings.

Use of Derivative Hedges
 
We use derivatives to hedge our market risk exposures. The primary types of derivatives used are interest-rate swaps and caps. Interest-rate swaps and capsDerivatives increase the flexibility of our funding alternatives by providing specific cash flows or characteristics that might not be as readily available or cost effective if obtained in the cash debt market. We do not speculate using derivatives and do not engage in derivatives trading. 

Hedging Debt Issuance. When CO bonds are issued, we often use the derivatives market to create funding that is more attractively priced than the funding available in the consolidated obligations market. A typical hedge of this type occurs when a CO bond is issued, while we simultaneously execute a matching interest rate swap. The counterparty pays a rate on the swap to us, which is designed to mirror the interest rate we pay on the CO bond. In this transaction we typically pay a variable interest rate generally LIBOR, which closely matches the interest payments we receive on short-term or variable-rate advances or investments. This intermediation between the capital and swap markets permits the acquisition of funds by us at lower all-in costs than would otherwise be available through the issuance of simple fixed- or floating-rate consolidated obligations in the capital markets. The continued attractiveness of such debt depends on yield relationships between the debt and derivative markets. If conditions in these markets change, we may alter the types or terms of the CO bonds that we issue. Occasionally, interest rate swaps are executed to hedge discount notes.

Hedging Advances. Interest-rate swaps are also used to increase the flexibility of advance offerings by effectively converting the specific cash flows or characteristics that the borrower prefers into cash flows or characteristics that may be more readily or cost effectively funded in the debt markets.

Hedging Mortgage Loans. We use Agency TBAs to hedge MDC positions. 

Hedging Investments. Some interest-rate swaps are executed to hedge investments. In addition, interest-rate caps are purchased to reduce the risk inherent in floating-rate instruments that include caps as part of the structure.

Other Hedges. We occasionally use derivatives, such as swaptions, to maintain our risk profile within the approved risk limits set forth in our Enterprise Risk Management Policy.risk management policies. On an infrequent basis, we may act as an intermediary between certain smaller member institutions and the capital markets by executing interest-rate swaps with members.

8490
Table of Contents


The volume of derivative hedges is often expressed in terms of notional amount, which is the amount upon which interest payments are calculated. The following table highlights the notional amounts by type of hedged item, hedging instrument, and hedging objective ($ amounts in millions).
Hedged Item/Hedging InstrumentHedging ObjectiveHedge Accounting DesignationDecember 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
Advances:
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swap (without options)Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Fair-value$10,961  $10,800  
Economic22  26  
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swap (with options)Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the advance.Fair-value6,128  3,152  
Pay floating with embedded features, receive floating interest-rate swap (non-callable)Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance.Economic  
Sub-total advances17,113  13,980  
Investments:   
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swapConverts the investment’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Fair-value4,072  4,381  
Economic5,010  —  
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swap (with options)Converts the investment's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the investment.Fair-value4,166  3,501  
Interest-rate capOffsets the interest-rate cap embedded in a variable-rate investment.Economic669  680  
Sub-total investments13,917  8,562  
Mortgage loans:
Interest-rate swaptionProvides the option to enter into an interest-rate swap to offset interest-rate or prepayment risk in a pooled mortgage portfolio hedge.Economic850  950  
Forward settlement agreementProtects against changes in market value of fixed-rate MDCs resulting from changes in interest rates.Economic70  44  
Sub-total mortgage loans920  994  
CO bonds:
Receive fixed, pay floating interest-rate swap (without options)Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Fair-value4,353  6,903  
Economic250  928  
Receive fixed or structured, pay floating interest-rate swap (with options)Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the bond.Fair-value11,428  6,398  
Economic—  10  
Receive float, pay float basis swapReduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the bond’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index.Economic1,000  —  
Sub-total CO bonds17,031  14,239  
Discount notes:
Receive fixed, pay floating interest-rate swapConverts the discount note’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Economic1,350  —  
Sub-total discount notes1,350  —  
Stand-alone derivatives:
MDCsProtects against fair-value risk associated with fixed-rate mortgage purchase commitments.Economic71  44  
Sub-total stand-alone derivatives71  44  
Total notional$50,402  $37,819  

Hedged Item/Hedging InstrumentHedging ObjectiveHedge Accounting DesignationDecember 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Advances:
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swap (without options)Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Fair-value$9,315 $10,961 
Economic— 22 
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swap (with options)Converts the advance’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the advance.Fair-value7,258 6,128 
Pay floating with embedded features, receive floating interest-rate swap (non-callable)Reduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the advance’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index and/or offsets embedded option risk in the advance.Economic— 
Sub-total advances16,573 17,113 
Investments: 
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swapConverts the investment’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Fair-value4,992 4,072 
Economic5,050 5,010 
Pay fixed, receive floating interest-rate swap (with options)Converts the investment's fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the investment.Fair-value4,367 4,166 
Interest-rate capOffsets the interest-rate cap embedded in a variable-rate investment.Economic626 669 
Sub-total investments15,035 13,917 
Mortgage loans:
Interest-rate swaptionProvides the option to enter into an interest-rate swap to offset interest-rate or prepayment risk in a pooled mortgage portfolio hedge.Economic— 850 
Forward settlement agreementProtects against changes in market value of fixed-rate MDCs resulting from changes in interest rates.Economic181 70 
Sub-total mortgage loans181 920 
CO bonds:
Receive fixed, pay floating interest-rate swap (without options)Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Fair-value11,018 4,353 
Economic— 250 
Receive fixed or structured, pay floating interest-rate swap (with options)Converts the bond’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index and offsets option risk in the bond.Fair-value3,278 11,428 
Economic— — 
Receive float, pay float basis swapReduces interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps by converting the bond’s variable rate to a different variable-rate index.Economic3,177 1,000 
Sub-total CO bonds17,473 17,031 
Discount notes:
Receive fixed, pay floating interest-rate swapConverts the discount note’s fixed rate to a variable-rate index.Economic950 1,350 
Sub-total discount notes950 1,350 
Stand-alone derivatives:
MDCsProtects against fair-value risk associated with fixed-rate mortgage purchase commitments.Economic180 71 
Sub-total stand-alone derivatives180 71 
Total notional$50,392 $50,402 

Complex swaps include, but are not limited to, step-up bonds. The leveluse of different types of derivatives is contingent upon and tends to vary withvaries based on our balance sheet size, our members' demand for advances, mortgage loan purchase activity, and consolidated obligation issuance levels.



85
91
Table of Contents


Interest-Rate Swaps. The following table presents the amount swapped by interest-rate payment terms for trading and AFS securities, advances, CO bonds, and discount notes ($ amounts in millions).
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018

Interest-Rate Payment Terms
Total OutstandingAmount Swapped% SwappedTotal OutstandingAmount Swapped% Swapped
Trading securities:
Total fixed-rate$5,017  $5,017  100 %$—  $—  — %
Total trading securities, fair value$5,017  $5,017  100 %$—  $—  — %
AFS securities:
Total fixed-rate$8,395  $8,395  100 %$7,651  $7,651  100 %
Total AFS securities, amortized cost$8,395  $8,395  100 %$7,651  $7,651  100 %
Advances:
Total fixed-rate$24,999  $17,111  68 %$24,750  $13,978  56 %
Total variable-rate7,273   — %8,079   — %
Total advances, par value$32,272  $17,113  53 %$32,829  $13,980  43 %
CO bonds:
Total fixed-rate$27,596  $16,031  58 %$27,520  $14,239  52 %
Total variable-rate17,067  1,000  %12,855  —  — %
Total CO bonds, par value$44,663  $17,031  38 %$40,375  $14,239  35 %
Discount notes:
Total fixed-rate$17,713  $1,350  %$20,953  $—  — %
Total discount notes, par value$17,713  $1,350  %$20,953  $—  — %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019

Interest-Rate Payment Terms
Total OutstandingAmount Swapped% SwappedTotal OutstandingAmount Swapped% Swapped
Trading securities:
Total fixed-rate$5,095 $5,095 100 %$5,017 $5,017 100 %
Total trading securities, fair value$5,095 $5,095 100 %$5,017 $5,017 100 %
AFS securities:
Total fixed-rate$10,008 $10,008 100 %$8,395 $8,395 100 %
Total AFS securities, amortized cost$10,008 $10,008 100 %$8,395 $8,395 100 %
Advances:
Total fixed-rate$25,452 $16,573 65 %$24,999 $17,111 68 %
Total variable-rate5,239 — — %7,273 — %
Total advances, par value$30,691 $16,573 54 %$32,272 $17,113 53 %
CO bonds:
Total fixed-rate$24,766 $14,296 58 %$27,596 $16,031 58 %
Total variable-rate18,480 3,177 17 %17,067 1,000 %
Total CO bonds, par value$43,246 $17,473 40 %$44,663 $17,031 38 %
Discount notes:
Total fixed-rate$16,620 $950 %$17,713 $1,350 %
Total discount notes, par value$16,620 $950 %$17,713 $1,350 %

For information on credit risk related to derivatives, see Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Risk Management - Credit Risk Management - DerivativesDerivatives.


8692
Table of Contents


Replacement of the LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate

In July 2017, the FCA, a regulator of financial services firms and financial markets in the UK, announced that it will plan for a phase-out of regulatory oversight responsibilities for LIBOR interest rate indices. The FCA indicated that it will cease persuading or compelling banks to submit rates for the calculation of LIBOR after 2021 and that the continuation of LIBOR on the current basis will not be guaranteed after 2021. The Alternative Reference Rates Committee has proposed SOFR as its recommended alternative to LIBOR, and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York began publishing SOFR rates in April 2018.

In March 2021, the FCA further announced that LIBOR will either cease to be provided by any administrator or no longer be representative immediately after December 31, 2021, or, in the case of some more frequently used U.S. dollar LIBOR settings, immediately after June 30, 2023.

Most of our advances, investments, CO bonds, derivative assets, derivative liabilities, and related collateral are indexed to LIBOR. Some of these assets and liabilities and related collateral have maturity dates that extend beyond the date in which the applicable LIBOR setting ceases to be provided or to be representative. As a result, we are continuing to evaluate the potential impact of the replacement of the LIBOR benchmark interest rate, including the likelihood of SOFR as the dominant replacement on an ongoing basis.

We continue to implement our transition plan that has the flexibility to evolve with market developments and standards, member needs, and guidance provided by the issuers of Agency securities. The key components of our LIBOR replacement plan are: exposure, fallback language, information technology systems preparation, and balance sheet strategy. We have evaluated our current exposure to LIBOR including completing an inventory of all financial instruments impacted and identifying financial instruments and contracts that may require adding or adjusting fallback language. We have assessed our operational readiness and, as a result, are configuring our core Bank systems and replacing LIBOR references in policies and procedures. From a balance-sheet management perspective, we participate in the issuance of SOFR-indexed debt. In addition, in accordance with the Supervisory Letter issued by the Finance Agency to the FHLBanks on September 27, 2019, we have ceased purchasing investments that reference LIBOR and mature after December 31, 2021. We have also ceased the issuance of LIBOR-indexed debt with maturities beyond 2021. Further, beginning March 31, 2020, we have ceased entering into transactions in certain structured advances and advances with terms directly linked to LIBOR that mature after December 31, 2021. Beginning June 30, 2020, we are no longer authorized to enter into derivatives with swaps, caps, or floors indexed to LIBOR that terminate after December 31, 2021.

We have revised our members’ collateral reporting requirements to distinguish LIBOR-linked collateral that matures after December 31, 2021. Finally, we have implemented OIS as an alternative interest rate hedging strategy for certain financial instruments.


93
Table of Contents


The following table presents our LIBOR-rate indexed financial instruments outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019 by year of maturity ($ amounts in millions).
LIBOR-Indexed Financial InstrumentsYear of Maturity
December 31, 202020212022 and thereafterTotal
Assets:
Advances, par value (1)
$40 $3,453 $3,493 
Mortgage-backed securities, par value (2)
— 3,587 3,587 
Total$40 $7,040 $7,080 
Interest-rate swaps - receive leg, notional (2):
Cleared$2,037 $6,468 $8,505 
Uncleared105 10,550 10,655 
Total$2,142 $17,018 $19,160 
Liabilities:
CO bonds, par value (2)
$6,675 $— $6,675 
Interest-rate swaps - pay leg, notional (2):
Cleared$12,711 $434 $13,145 
Uncleared2,950 204 3,154 
Total$15,661 $638 $16,299 
Other derivatives, notional:
Interest-rate caps held (2)
$— $626 $626 

Year of Maturity
December 31, 2019202020212022 and thereafterTotal
Assets:
Advances, par value (1)
$178 $311 $3,841 $4,330 
Mortgage-backed securities, par value (2)
12 — 4,437 4,449 
Total$190 $311 $8,278 $8,779 
Interest-rate swaps - receive leg, notional (2):
Cleared$4,364 $1,871 $7,087 $13,322 
Uncleared279 117 10,814 11,210 
Total$4,643 $1,988 $17,901 $24,532 
Liabilities:
CO bonds, par value (2)
$10,235 $1,050 $— $11,285 
Interest-rate swaps - pay leg, notional (2):
Cleared$4,520 $849 $234 $5,603 
Uncleared2,737 2,445 6,248 11,430 
Total$7,257 $3,294 $6,482 $17,033 
Other derivatives, notional:
Interest-rate caps held (2)
$43 $— $626 $669 

(1)    Year of maturity on our advances is based on redemption term.
(2)    Year of maturity on our MBS, interest-rate swaps, CO bonds and interest-rate caps is based on contractual maturity. The actual maturities on MBS will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.

For more information, see Item 1A. Risk Factors - Changes to or Replacement of the LIBOR Benchmark Interest Rate Could Adversely Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
94
Table of Contents




Page
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATANumber
Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
Statements of Condition as of December 31, 20192020 and 20182019
Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018
Statements of Capital for the Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 20192020
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018
Notes to Financial Statements:
Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance
Note 3 - Cash and Due from Banks
Note 4 - Investment SecuritiesInvestments
Note 5 - Advances
Note 6 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio
Note 7 - Allowance for Credit LossesPremises, Software and Equipment
Note 8 - Premises, SoftwareDerivatives and EquipmentHedging Activities
Note 9 - Derivatives and Hedging ActivitiesDeposit Liabilities
Note 10 - Deposit LiabilitiesConsolidated Obligations
Note 11 - Consolidated ObligationsAffordable Housing Program
Note 12 - Affordable Housing ProgramCapital
Note 13 - CapitalAccumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Note 14 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Note 15 - Employee and Director Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans
Note 15 - Segment Information
Note 16 - Segment InformationEstimated Fair Values
Note 17 - Estimated Fair ValuesCommitments and Contingencies
Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies
Note 19 - Related Party and Other Transactions
Defined Terms

8795
Table of Contents


Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over our financial reporting ("ICFR"), as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Our ICFR is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and includes those policies and procedures that:
 
pertain to the maintenance of our records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and asset dispositions; 
provide reasonable assurance that our transactions are recorded as necessary to permit the preparation of our financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and board of directors; and
provide reasonable assurance regarding the prevention or timely detection of any unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Reasonable assurance, as defined in Section 13(b)(7) of the Exchange Act, is the level of detail and degree of assurance that would satisfy prudent officials in the conduct of their own affairs in devising and maintaining a system of internal accounting controls.

Because of its inherent limitations, ICFR may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer, we assessed the effectiveness of our ICFR as of December 31, 2019.2020. Our assessment included extensive documentation, evaluation, and testing of the design and operating effectiveness of our ICFR. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. These criteria include the areas of control environment, risk assessment, control activities, information and communication, and monitoring. Based on our assessment using these criteria, our management concluded that we maintained effective ICFR as of December 31, 2019.2020.

8696
Table of Contents


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of the
Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying statements of condition of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis (the "Bank") as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the related statements of income, comprehensive income, capital and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2020, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). We also have audited the Bank's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Bank as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20192020 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Bank maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Bank's management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Bank's financial statements and on the Bank's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Bank in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

87
Table of Contents


Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


97
Table of Contents


Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Valuation of Interest-Rate Related Derivatives and Hedged Items

As described in Notes 8 and 16 to the financial statements, the Bank uses derivatives to reduce funding costs and to manage its exposure to interest-rate risks, among other objectives. The total notional amount of derivatives as of December 31, 2020 was $50 billion, of which 80% were designated as hedging instruments, and the net fair value of derivative assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2020 was $283 million and $23 million, respectively. The fair values of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items are generally estimated using standard valuation techniques such as discounted cash-flow analysis and comparisons to similar instruments. The discounted cash-flow analysis uses market-observable inputs, such as interest rate curves and volatility assumptions.

The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to the valuation of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items is a critical audit matter are the significant audit effort in evaluating the interest rate curves and volatility assumptions used to fair value these derivatives and hedged items, and the audit effort involved the use of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the valuation of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items, including controls over the method, data and assumptions. These procedures also included, among others, the involvement of professionals with specialized skill and knowledge to assist in developing an independent range of prices for a sample of interest-rate related derivatives and hedged items and comparison of management’s estimate to the independently developed ranges. Developing the independent range of prices involved testing the completeness and accuracy of data provided by management and independently developing the interest rate curves and volatility assumptions.



/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Indianapolis, Indiana
March 10, 20202021

We have served as the Bank's auditor since 1990.


8898
Table of Contents


Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Statements of Condition
($ amounts in thousands, except par value)
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Assets:
Assets:
Assets:
Cash and due from banks (Note 3)Cash and due from banks (Note 3)$220,294  $100,735  Cash and due from banks (Note 3)$1,811,544 $220,294 
Interest-bearing deposits809,141  1,210,705  
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,500,000  3,212,726  
Federal funds sold2,550,000  3,085,000  
Interest-bearing deposits (Note 4)Interest-bearing deposits (Note 4)100,026 809,141 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell (Note 4)Securities purchased under agreements to resell (Note 4)2,500,000 1,500,000 
Federal funds sold (Note 4)Federal funds sold (Note 4)1,215,000 2,550,000 
Trading securities (Note 4)Trading securities (Note 4)5,016,649  —  Trading securities (Note 4)5,094,703 5,016,649 
Available-for-sale securities (Note 4)8,484,478  7,703,596  
Held-to-maturity securities (estimated fair values of $5,216,206 and $5,676,145, respectively) (Note 4)
5,216,401  5,673,720  
Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $10,007,978 and $8,394,665, respectively) (Note 4)Available-for-sale securities (amortized cost of $10,007,978 and $8,394,665, respectively) (Note 4)10,144,899 8,484,478 
Held-to-maturity securities (estimated fair values of $4,723,796 and $5,216,206, respectively) (Note 4)
Held-to-maturity securities (estimated fair values of $4,723,796 and $5,216,206, respectively) (Note 4)
4,701,302 5,216,401 
Advances (Note 5)Advances (Note 5)32,480,108  32,727,668  Advances (Note 5)31,347,486 32,480,108 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net of allowance for loan losses of ($300) and ($600), respectively (Notes 6 and 7)10,815,037  11,384,978  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net (Note 6)Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net (Note 6)8,515,645 10,815,037 
Accrued interest receivableAccrued interest receivable131,822  124,611  Accrued interest receivable103,076 131,822 
Premises, software, and equipment, net (Note 8)36,549  37,198  
Derivative assets, net (Note 9)208,008  116,764  
Premises, software, and equipment, net (Note 7)Premises, software, and equipment, net (Note 7)33,993 36,549 
Derivative assets, net (Note 8)Derivative assets, net (Note 8)283,082 208,008 
Other assetsOther assets42,288  33,998  Other assets74,000 42,288 
Total assetsTotal assets$67,510,775  $65,411,699  Total assets$65,924,756 $67,510,775 
Liabilities:
Liabilities:
 
Liabilities:
 
Deposits (Note 10)$960,304  $500,440  
Consolidated obligations (Note 11):
Deposits (Note 9)Deposits (Note 9)$1,375,206 $960,304 
Consolidated obligations (Note 10):Consolidated obligations (Note 10):
Discount notesDiscount notes17,676,793  20,895,262  Discount notes16,617,079 17,676,793 
BondsBonds44,715,224  40,265,465  Bonds43,332,946 44,715,224 
Total consolidated obligations, netTotal consolidated obligations, net62,392,017  61,160,727  Total consolidated obligations, net59,950,025 62,392,017 
Accrued interest payableAccrued interest payable178,981  179,728  Accrued interest payable63,581 178,981 
Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 12)38,084  40,747  
Derivative liabilities, net (Note 9)3,206  21,067  
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 13)322,902  168,876  
Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 11)Affordable Housing Program payable (Note 11)34,402 38,084 
Derivative liabilities, net (Note 8)Derivative liabilities, net (Note 8)22,979 3,206 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 12)Mandatorily redeemable capital stock (Note 12)250,768 322,902 
Other liabilitiesOther liabilities458,521  289,665  Other liabilities777,493 458,521 
Total liabilitiesTotal liabilities64,354,015  62,361,250  Total liabilities62,474,454 64,354,015 
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18)
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)Commitments and contingencies (Note 17)00
Capital (Note 13):
 
Capital (Note 12):
Capital (Note 12):
 
Capital stock (putable at par value of $100 per share):Capital stock (putable at par value of $100 per share):Capital stock (putable at par value of $100 per share):
Class B-1 issued and outstanding shares: 19,737,727 and 19,306,333, respectively1,973,773  1,930,633  
Class B-2 issued and outstanding shares: 3,028 and 3,192, respectively303  319  
Total capital stock1,974,076  1,930,952  
Class B issued and outstanding shares: 22,075,696 and 19,740,755, respectivelyClass B issued and outstanding shares: 22,075,696 and 19,740,755, respectively2,207,570 1,974,076 
Retained earnings:Retained earnings:Retained earnings:
UnrestrictedUnrestricted864,454  855,311  Unrestricted868,904 864,454 
RestrictedRestricted250,854  222,499  Restricted268,426 250,854 
Total retained earningsTotal retained earnings1,115,308  1,077,810  Total retained earnings1,137,330 1,115,308 
Total accumulated other comprehensive income (Note 14)67,376  41,687  
Total accumulated other comprehensive incomeTotal accumulated other comprehensive income105,402 67,376 
Total capitalTotal capital3,156,760  3,050,449  Total capital3,450,302 3,156,760 
Total liabilities and capitalTotal liabilities and capital$67,510,775  $65,411,699  Total liabilities and capital$65,924,756 $67,510,775 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

8999


Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Statements of Income
($ amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017 202020192018
Interest Income:Interest Income:Interest Income:
AdvancesAdvances$813,152  $726,243  $405,863  Advances$329,675 $813,152 $726,243 
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits22,050  21,004  3,397  Interest-bearing deposits5,652 22,050 21,004 
Securities purchased under agreements to resellSecurities purchased under agreements to resell79,100  58,940  6,144  Securities purchased under agreements to resell11,644 79,100 58,940 
Federal funds soldFederal funds sold62,235  54,602  44,054  Federal funds sold10,793 62,235 54,602 
Trading securitiesTrading securities53,213  —  —  Trading securities90,860 53,213 
Available-for-sale securitiesAvailable-for-sale securities214,558  197,600  121,049  Available-for-sale securities103,658 214,558 197,600 
Held-to-maturity securitiesHeld-to-maturity securities150,822  152,581  119,347  Held-to-maturity securities70,019 150,822 152,581 
Mortgage loans held for portfolioMortgage loans held for portfolio357,231  354,091  314,827  Mortgage loans held for portfolio231,152 357,231 354,091 
Other interest income, netOther interest income, net—  17  1,955  Other interest income, net17 
Total interest incomeTotal interest income1,752,361  1,565,078  1,016,636  Total interest income853,453 1,752,361 1,565,078 
Interest Expense:Interest Expense:Interest Expense:
Consolidated obligation discount notesConsolidated obligation discount notes440,305  392,281  182,104  Consolidated obligation discount notes116,680 440,305 392,281 
Consolidated obligation bondsConsolidated obligation bonds1,050,015  865,298  559,711  Consolidated obligation bonds461,953 1,050,015 865,298 
DepositsDeposits12,899  11,021  4,784  Deposits2,856 12,899 11,021 
Mandatorily redeemable capital stockMandatorily redeemable capital stock11,863  8,391  7,034  Mandatorily redeemable capital stock8,594 11,863 8,391 
Other interest expenseOther interest expense37  —  —  Other interest expense37 
Total interest expenseTotal interest expense1,515,119  1,276,991  753,633  Total interest expense590,083 1,515,119 1,276,991 
Net interest incomeNet interest income237,242  288,087  263,003  Net interest income263,370 237,242 288,087 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses(289) (231) 51  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses140 (289)(231)
Net interest income after provision for credit lossesNet interest income after provision for credit losses237,531  288,318  262,952  Net interest income after provision for credit losses263,230 237,531 288,318 
Other Income:Other Income:Other Income:
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses, credit portion—  —  (207) 
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securitiesNet realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities—  32,407  —  Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities504 32,407 
Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securitiesNet realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities—  (45) —  Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities(45)
Net gains on trading securities32,996  —  —  
Net gains (losses) on trading securitiesNet gains (losses) on trading securities(14,484)32,996 
Net losses on derivatives and hedging activitiesNet losses on derivatives and hedging activities(18,983) (13,350) (9,258) Net losses on derivatives and hedging activities(48,362)(18,983)(13,350)
Service feesService fees776  995  947  Service fees559 776 995 
Standby letters of credit feesStandby letters of credit fees703  609  747  Standby letters of credit fees690 703 609 
Other, net (Note 18)4,817  (107) 1,775  
Other, netOther, net5,577 4,817 (107)
Total other income (loss)Total other income (loss)20,309  20,509  (5,996) Total other income (loss)(55,516)20,309 20,509 
Other Expenses:Other Expenses:Other Expenses:
Compensation and benefitsCompensation and benefits55,494  49,938  45,630  Compensation and benefits60,789 55,494 49,938 
Other operating expensesOther operating expenses29,526  28,476  26,349  Other operating expenses31,609 29,526 28,476 
Federal Housing Finance AgencyFederal Housing Finance Agency4,189  3,633  3,328  Federal Housing Finance Agency4,989 4,189 3,633 
Office of FinanceOffice of Finance4,907  4,503  3,687  Office of Finance5,005 4,907 4,503 
OtherOther4,878  4,971  3,368  Other6,742 4,878 4,971 
Total other expensesTotal other expenses98,994  91,521  82,362  Total other expenses109,134 98,994 91,521 
Income before assessmentsIncome before assessments158,846  217,306  174,594  Income before assessments98,580 158,846 217,306 
Affordable Housing Program assessmentsAffordable Housing Program assessments17,071  22,570  18,163  Affordable Housing Program assessments10,717 17,071 22,570 
Net incomeNet income$141,775  $194,736  $156,431  Net income$87,863 $141,775 $194,736 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

90100


Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Statements of Comprehensive Income
($ amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017 202020192018
Net incomeNet income$141,775  $194,736  $156,431  Net income$87,863 $141,775 $194,736 
Other Comprehensive Income:Other Comprehensive Income:Other Comprehensive Income:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securitiesNet change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities36,827  (39,533) 53,051  Net change in unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale securities47,108 36,827 (39,533)
Net non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment lossesNet non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses—  (29,271) 2,436  Net non-credit portion of other-than-temporary impairment losses(29,271)
Pension benefits, net (Note 15)(11,138) (915) (449) 
Pension benefits, net (Note 14)Pension benefits, net (Note 14)(9,082)(11,138)(915)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)Total other comprehensive income (loss)25,689  (69,719) 55,038  Total other comprehensive income (loss)38,026 25,689 (69,719)
Total comprehensive incomeTotal comprehensive income$167,464  $125,017  $211,469  Total comprehensive income$125,889 $167,464 $125,017 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

91101


Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Statements of Capital
Years Ended December 31, 2017, 2018, 2019, and 20192020
($ amounts and shares in thousands)

Capital Stock  Retained Earnings  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Capital
Capital StockRetained EarningsAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Capital
Shares  Par Value  Unrestricted  Restricted  Total  
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Capital
SharesPar ValueUnrestrictedRestrictedTotalAccumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
Total
Capital
Balance, December 31, 201614,926  $1,492,581  $734,982  $152,265  $887,247  $56,368  $2,436,196  
Balance, December 31, 2017Balance, December 31, 201718,578 $1,857,766 $792,783 $183,551 $976,334 $111,406 $2,945,506 
Total comprehensive income125,145  31,286  156,431  55,038  211,469  
Proceeds from issuance of capital stock3,652  365,185  365,185  
Cash dividends on capital stock (4.25%)(67,344) —  (67,344) (67,344) 
Balance, December 31, 201718,578  $1,857,766  $792,783  $183,551  $976,334  $111,406  $2,945,506  
Total comprehensive incomeTotal comprehensive income155,788  38,948  194,736  (69,719) 125,017  Total comprehensive income155,788 38,948 194,736 (69,719)125,017 
Proceeds from issuance of capital stockProceeds from issuance of capital stock1,044  104,432  104,432  Proceeds from issuance of capital stock1,044 104,432 104,432 
Redemption/repurchase of capital stockRedemption/repurchase of capital stock—  (32) (32) Redemption/repurchase of capital stock— (32)(32)
Shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, netShares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(312) (31,214) (31,214) Shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(312)(31,214)(31,214)
Cash dividends on capital stock (5.00%)Cash dividends on capital stock (5.00%)(93,260) —  (93,260) (93,260) Cash dividends on capital stock (5.00%)(93,260)— (93,260)(93,260)
Balance, December 31, 2018Balance, December 31, 201819,310  $1,930,952  $855,311  $222,499  $1,077,810  $41,687  $3,050,449  Balance, December 31, 201819,310 $1,930,952 $855,311 $222,499 $1,077,810 $41,687 $3,050,449 
Total comprehensive incomeTotal comprehensive income113,420  28,355  141,775  25,689  167,464  Total comprehensive income113,420 28,355 141,775 25,689 167,464 
Proceeds from issuance of capital stockProceeds from issuance of capital stock1,941  194,102  194,102  Proceeds from issuance of capital stock1,941 194,102 194,102 
Shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, netShares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(1,510) (150,978) (150,978) Shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(1,510)(150,978)(150,978)
Cash dividends on capital stock (5.31%)Cash dividends on capital stock (5.31%)(104,277) —  (104,277) (104,277) Cash dividends on capital stock (5.31%)(104,277)— (104,277)(104,277)
Balance, December 31, 2019Balance, December 31, 201919,741  $1,974,076  $864,454  $250,854  $1,115,308  $67,376  $3,156,760  Balance, December 31, 201919,741 $1,974,076 $864,454 $250,854 $1,115,308 $67,376 $3,156,760 
Total comprehensive incomeTotal comprehensive income70,291 17,572 87,863 38,026 125,889 
Proceeds from issuance of capital stockProceeds from issuance of capital stock2,669 266,906 266,906 
Redemption/repurchase of capital stockRedemption/repurchase of capital stock(6)(621)(621)
Shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, netShares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable capital stock, net(328)(32,791)(32,791)
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing CorporationPartial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation10,574 — 10,574 10,574 
Cash dividends on capital stock (3.66%)Cash dividends on capital stock (3.66%)(76,415)— (76,415)(76,415)
Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 202022,076 $2,207,570 $868,904 $268,426 $1,137,330 $105,402 $3,450,302 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

92102


Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Statements of Cash Flows
($ amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017 202020192018
Operating Activities:
Operating Activities:
Operating Activities:
Net incomeNet income$141,775  $194,736  $156,431  Net income$87,863 $141,775 $194,736 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:
Amortization and depreciationAmortization and depreciation44,492  74,366  69,111  Amortization and depreciation74,130 44,492 74,366 
Changes in net derivative and hedging activitiesChanges in net derivative and hedging activities(287,098) 45,201  (13,643) Changes in net derivative and hedging activities(420,090)(287,098)45,201 
Net other-than-temporary impairment losses, credit portion—  —  207  
Loss on disposition of equipmentLoss on disposition of equipment—  37  —  Loss on disposition of equipment37 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses(289) (231) 51  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses140 (289)(231)
Net gains on trading securities(32,996) —  —  
Net losses (gains) on trading securitiesNet losses (gains) on trading securities14,484 (32,996)
Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securitiesNet realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities—  (32,407) —  Net realized gains from sale of available-for-sale securities(504)(32,407)
Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securitiesNet realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities—  45  —  Net realized losses from sale of held-to-maturity securities45 
Changes in:Changes in:Changes in:
Accrued interest receivableAccrued interest receivable(7,660) (19,387) (11,783) Accrued interest receivable28,855 (7,660)(19,387)
Other assetsOther assets(6,538) 541  (1,867) Other assets(28,853)(6,538)541 
Accrued interest payableAccrued interest payable(986) 44,192  37,343  Accrued interest payable(115,401)(986)44,192 
Other liabilitiesOther liabilities20,684  46,224  27,890  Other liabilities41,255 20,684 46,224 
Total adjustments, netTotal adjustments, net(270,391) 158,581  107,309  Total adjustments, net(405,984)(270,391)158,581 
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) operating activities(128,616) 353,317  263,740  Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities(318,121)(128,616)353,317 
Investing Activities:
Investing Activities:
Investing Activities:
Net change in:Net change in:Net change in:
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits65,727  (547,189) (464,287) Interest-bearing deposits169,514 65,727 (547,189)
Securities purchased under agreements to resellSecurities purchased under agreements to resell1,712,726  (607,266) (824,151) Securities purchased under agreements to resell(1,000,000)1,712,726 (607,266)
Federal funds soldFederal funds sold535,000  (1,805,000) 370,000  Federal funds sold1,335,000 535,000 (1,805,000)
Trading securities:Trading securities:Trading securities:
Proceeds from maturitiesProceeds from maturities4,160,000 
Proceeds from salesProceeds from sales249,844  —  —  Proceeds from sales249,844 
PurchasesPurchases(5,233,497) —  —  Purchases(4,252,538)(5,233,497)
Available-for-sale securities:Available-for-sale securities:Available-for-sale securities:
Proceeds from maturitiesProceeds from maturities510,500  102,522  1,041,227  Proceeds from maturities593,550 510,500 102,522 
Proceeds from salesProceeds from sales—  203,841  —  Proceeds from sales96,779 203,841 
PurchasesPurchases(785,129) (972,799) (2,213,866) Purchases(1,851,436)(785,129)(972,799)
Held-to-maturity securities:Held-to-maturity securities:Held-to-maturity securities:
Proceeds from maturitiesProceeds from maturities1,114,938  961,778  1,245,438  Proceeds from maturities1,428,899 1,114,938 961,778 
Proceeds from salesProceeds from sales—  41,226  —  Proceeds from sales41,226 
PurchasesPurchases(663,607) (780,272) (1,325,424) Purchases(744,501)(663,607)(780,272)
Advances:Advances:Advances:
Principal repaymentsPrincipal repayments351,631,834  343,131,228  280,448,048  Principal repayments255,014,417 351,631,834 343,131,228 
Disbursements to membersDisbursements to members(351,074,140) (341,791,120) (286,485,558) Disbursements to members(253,433,610)(351,074,140)(341,791,120)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio:Mortgage loans held for portfolio:Mortgage loans held for portfolio:
Principal collectionsPrincipal collections1,879,313  1,191,873  1,245,983  Principal collections4,398,392 1,879,313 1,191,873 
Purchases from membersPurchases from members(1,307,159) (2,255,741) (2,144,552) Purchases from members(2,082,767)(1,307,159)(2,255,741)
Purchases of premises, software, and equipmentPurchases of premises, software, and equipment(6,230) (6,765) (5,176) Purchases of premises, software, and equipment(4,641)(6,230)(6,765)
Loans to other Federal Home Loan Banks:Loans to other Federal Home Loan Banks:Loans to other Federal Home Loan Banks:
Principal repaymentsPrincipal repayments—  400,000  100,000  Principal repayments90,000 400,000 
DisbursementsDisbursements—  (400,000) (100,000) Disbursements(90,000)(400,000)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,369,880) (3,133,684) (9,112,318) 
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) investing activities3,827,058 (1,369,880)(3,133,684)

(continued)
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

93103


Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis
Statements of Cash Flows, continued
($ amounts in thousands)
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
201920182017202020192018
Financing Activities:
Financing Activities:
Financing Activities:
Changes in depositsChanges in deposits375,975  (68,140) 73,891  Changes in deposits414,531 375,975 (68,140)
Net payments on derivative contracts with financing elementsNet payments on derivative contracts with financing elements1,824  (340) (16,683) Net payments on derivative contracts with financing elements(3,694)1,824 (340)
Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:Net proceeds from issuance of consolidated obligations:
Discount notesDiscount notes342,745,604  352,096,048  216,011,184  Discount notes355,337,396 342,745,604 352,096,048 
BondsBonds40,241,691  17,386,007  23,856,245  Bonds48,663,468 40,241,691 17,386,007 
Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations:Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations:Payments for matured and retired consolidated obligations:
Discount notesDiscount notes(345,937,042) (351,576,032) (212,480,262) Discount notes(356,372,123)(345,937,042)(351,576,032)
BondsBonds(35,902,870) (14,996,190) (19,379,260) Bonds(50,052,784)(35,902,870)(14,996,190)
Loans from other Federal Home Loan Banks:Loans from other Federal Home Loan Banks:Loans from other Federal Home Loan Banks:
Proceeds from borrowingsProceeds from borrowings250,000  —  —  Proceeds from borrowings250,000 
Principal repaymentsPrincipal repayments(250,000) —  —  Principal repayments(250,000)
Proceeds from issuance of capital stockProceeds from issuance of capital stock194,102  104,432  365,185  Proceeds from issuance of capital stock266,906 194,102 104,432 
Proceeds from issuance of mandatorily redeemable capital stockProceeds from issuance of mandatorily redeemable capital stock3,704  —  —  Proceeds from issuance of mandatorily redeemable capital stock3,704 
Payments for redemption/repurchase of capital stockPayments for redemption/repurchase of capital stock—  (32) —  Payments for redemption/repurchase of capital stock(621)(32)
Payments for redemption/repurchase of mandatorily redeemable
capital stock
Payments for redemption/repurchase of mandatorily redeemable
capital stock
(656) (26,660) (5,721) 
Payments for redemption/repurchase of mandatorily redeemable
capital stock
(104,925)(656)(26,660)
Partial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing CorporationPartial recovery of prior capital distribution to Financing Corporation10,574 
Dividend payments on capital stockDividend payments on capital stock(104,277) (93,260) (67,344) Dividend payments on capital stock(76,415)(104,277)(93,260)
Net cash provided by financing activities1,618,055  2,825,833  8,357,235  
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activitiesNet cash provided by (used in) financing activities(1,917,687)1,618,055 2,825,833 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and due from banks119,559  45,466  (491,343) 
Net increase in cash and due from banksNet increase in cash and due from banks1,591,250 119,559 45,466 
Cash and due from banks at beginning of yearCash and due from banks at beginning of year100,735  55,269  546,612  Cash and due from banks at beginning of year220,294 100,735 55,269 
Cash and due from banks at end of yearCash and due from banks at end of year$220,294  $100,735  $55,269  Cash and due from banks at end of year$1,811,544 $220,294 $100,735 
Supplemental Disclosures:
Supplemental Disclosures:
Supplemental Disclosures:
Cash activities:Cash activities:Cash activities:
Interest paymentsInterest payments$1,501,471  $1,193,500  $682,034  Interest payments$804,173 $1,501,471 $1,193,500 
Affordable Housing Program paymentsAffordable Housing Program payments19,734  13,989  12,595  Affordable Housing Program payments14,399 19,734 13,989 
Non-cash activities:Non-cash activities:Non-cash activities:
Purchases of available-for-sale securities, traded but not yet settled84,086  —  —  
Purchases of investment securities, traded but not yet settledPurchases of investment securities, traded but not yet settled236,507 84,086 
Capitalized interest on certain held-to-maturity securitiesCapitalized interest on certain held-to-maturity securities4,624  4,984  3,282  Capitalized interest on certain held-to-maturity securities1,412 4,624 4,984 
Par value of shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable
capital stock, net
Par value of shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable
capital stock, net
150,978  31,214  —  
Par value of shares reclassified to mandatorily redeemable
capital stock, net
32,791 150,978 31,214 
 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

94104



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

These Notes to Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the Statements of Condition as of December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, and the Statements of Income, Comprehensive Income, Capital, and Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 2017.2018. We use acronyms and terms throughout these Notes to Financial Statements that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms. Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms "Bank," "we," "us," and "our" refer to the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis or its management.

Background Information

The Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis, a federally chartered corporation, is one of 11 regional wholesale FHLBanks in the United States. The FHLBanks are GSEs that were organized under the Bank Act to serve the public by enhancing the availability of credit for residential mortgages and targeted community development. Even though we are part of the FHLBank System, we operate as a separate entity with our own management, employees and board of directors.

Each FHLBank is a financial cooperative that provides a readily available, competitively-priced source of funds to its member institutions. Regulated financial depositories and non-captive insurance companies engaged in residential housing finance that have their principal place of business located in, or are domiciled in, our district states of Michigan or Indiana are eligible for membership in our Bank. Additionally, qualified CDFIs are eligible to be members. Housing Associates, including state and local housing authorities, that meet certain statutory and regulatory criteria may also borrow from us. While eligible to borrow, Housing Associates are not members and, as such, are not allowed to hold our capital stock.

Each member must purchase a minimum amount of our capital stock based on the amount of its total mortgage assets. A member may be required to purchase additional activity-based capital stock as it engages in certain business activities with us. Members and former members own all of our capital stock. Former members (including certain non-member institutions that own our capital stock as a result of a merger with or acquisition of a member) hold our capital stock solely to support credit products or mortgage loans still outstanding on our statement of condition. All owners of our capital stock, to the extent declared by our board of directors, receive dividends on their capital stock, subject to the applicable regulations as discussed in Note 1312 - Capital. For more information about transactions with related parties, see Note 1918 - Related Party and Other Transactions.

The FHLBanks' Office of Finance was established to facilitate the issuance and servicing of the debt instruments of the FHLBanks, known as consolidated obligations, consisting of bonds and discount notes, and to prepare and publish the FHLBanks' combined quarterly and annual financial reports.

ConsolidatedProceeds from the issuance of consolidated obligations are the primary source of funds for the FHLBanks. Deposits, other borrowings and capital stock issued to members provide additional funds. We primarily use these funds to:

disburse advances to members;
acquire mortgage loans from PFIs through our MPP;
maintain liquidity; and
invest in other opportunities to support the residential housing market.

We also provide correspondent services, such as wire transfer, security safekeeping, and settlement services, to our members.

The Finance Agency is the independent federal regulator of the FHLBanks, Freddie Mac, and Fannie Mae. The Finance Agency's stated mission is to ensure that the housing GSEs operate in a safe and sound manner so that they serve as a reliable source of liquidity and funding for housing finance and community investment.
95105
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1 - Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP and SEC requirements.

The financial statements contain all adjustments that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of ourthe Bank's financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the periods presented. All such adjustments were of a normal recurring nature.

Use of Estimates. When preparing financial statements in accordance with GAAP, we are required to make subjective assumptions and estimates that may affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported amounts of income and expense. Although the reported amounts and disclosures reflect our best estimates, actual results could differ significantly from these estimates. The most significant estimates pertain to derivatives and hedging activities, as discussed in Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities, and the fair values of financial instruments.

Estimated Fair Value. The estimated fair value amounts, recorded on the statement of condition and presented in the accompanying disclosures, reflect appropriate valuation methods and have been determined based on the assumptions that we believe market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability and reflect appropriate valuation methods.liability. Although we use our best judgment in estimating fair value, there are inherent limitations in any valuation technique. Therefore, these estimated fair values may not be indicative of the amounts that would have been realized in market transactions on the reporting dates. For more information, see Note 1716 - Estimated Fair Values.

Reclassifications. We have reclassified certain amounts reported in prior periods to conform to the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on total assets, total liabilities, total capital, net income, total comprehensive income or net cash flows.

Interest-Bearing Deposits, Securities Purchased under Agreements to Resell, and Federal Funds Sold. These investments provide short-term liquidity and are carried at cost. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are treated as short-term, collateralized financings. These securities are held in safekeeping in ourthe Bank's name by third-party custodians approved by us. If the market value of the underlying assets declines below the market value required as collateral, the counterparty must (i) place an equivalent amount of additional securities in safekeeping in ourthe Bank's name, and/or (ii) remit an equivalent amount of cash, or the dollar value of the resale agreement will be reduced accordingly. Federal funds sold are treated as short-term, unsecured loans.

Allowance for Credit Losses. As a result of adopting new accounting guidance on January 1, 2020, these investments are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses. If necessary, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for credit losses. We use the collateral maintenance provision practical expedient for securities purchased under agreements to resell whereby a credit loss is recognized only if there is a collateral shortfall which we do not believe the counterparty is willing or able to replenish in accordance with the contractual terms. The credit loss would be limited to the difference between the estimated fair value of the collateral and the investment’s amortized cost.

Prior to January 1, 2020, we recorded an allowance for credit losses on these investments only if it was probable a loss had been incurred as of the statement of condition date and the amount of loss could be reasonably estimated. For more information on the allowance methodology related to these investments, see Note 4 - Investments.





106
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Investment Securities. Purchases and sales of securities are recorded on a trade date basis. We classify investments as trading, HTM or AFS at the date of acquisition.

Trading Securities. Securities classified as trading are held for liquidity purposes and carried at fair value. We record changes in the fair value of these securities through other income as net gains (losses) on trading securities. Finance Agency
regulation and our Enterprise Risk Management Policyrisk management policies prohibit trading in or the speculative use of these instruments and
limit the credit risk arising from these instruments. We did not have any investments classified as trading securities as of or during the years ended December 31, 2018 or 2017.securities.

HTM Securities. Securities for which we have both the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as HTM. The carrying value includes adjustments made to the cost basis of the security for purchase discount and related accretion, purchase premium and related amortization, and collection of principal.

Certain changes in circumstances may cause us to change our intent to hold a particular security to maturity without necessarily calling into question our intent to hold other debt securities to maturity. Thus, the sale or transfer of an HTM security due to certain changes in circumstances, such as evidence of significant deterioration in the issuer's creditworthiness or changes in regulatory requirements, is not considered to be inconsistent with its original classification. Other events may also cause us to sell or transfer an HTM security without necessarily calling into question our intent to hold other debt securities to maturity, but such events must be isolated, non-recurring, unusual, and could not have been reasonably anticipated.


96
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

In addition, sales of HTM debt securities that meet either of the following two conditions may be considered as maturities for purposes of the classification of securities: (i) the sale occurs near enough to its maturity date (or call date, if exercise of the call is probable) that interest-rate risk is substantially eliminated as a pricing factor and any changes in market interest rates would not have a significant effect on the security's fair value, or (ii) the sale occurs after we have already collected a substantial portion (at least 85%) of the principal outstanding at acquisition due either to prepayments or to scheduled payments payable in equal installments (both principal and interest) over its term.

AFS Securities. Securities that are not classified as trading or HTM are classified as AFS and carried at estimated fair value. We record changes in the fair value of these securities in OCI as net change in unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities, except for AFS securities in hedge relationships that qualify as fair-value hedges. For those securities, beginning January 1, 2019, we record the portion of the change in fair value attributable to the risk being hedged in earningsinterest income together with the related change in the fair value of the derivative, and record the remainder of the change in the fair value in OCI as net unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities.

Prior to January 1, 2019, we recorded the portion of the change in the fair value of the investment related to the risk being hedged in other income as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities together with the related change in the fair value of the derivative.

Allowance for Credit Losses. Our HTM securities are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses on a collective, or pooled, basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary, e.g. the securities do not possess similar risk characteristics. If deemed necessary, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.

We individually evaluate our AFS securities for impairment on a quarterly basis. Impairment exists when the estimated fair value of the investment is less than its amortized cost (i.e., in an unrealized loss position). In assessing whether a credit loss exists on an impaired security, we consider whether there could be a shortfall in receiving all cash flows contractually due. In those instances where we determine a shortfall could exist, we compare the present value of cash flows to be collected from the security with its amortized cost. If the present value of cash flows is less than amortized cost, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for credit losses. The allowance is limited by the amount of the unrealized loss and excludes any uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.

If we do not intend to sell an impaired AFS security and it is not more likely than not that we will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, any remaining difference between the security’s estimated fair value and amortized cost is recorded to net unrealized gains (losses) on AFS securities within OCI. If we intend to sell an impaired AFS security, or more likely than not will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, any allowance for credit losses is reversed and the amortized cost basis is written down to the security’s estimated fair value at the reporting date with any such impairment reported in earnings as net gains (losses) on investment securities. For more information on the change in presentation of gains (losses) onallowance methodology related to our derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships,HTM and AFS securities, see Note 24 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting GuidanceInvestments.
107
.Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Amortization of Purchase Premiums and Discounts. Since we hold a large number of similar loans underlying our MBS and ABS, for which prepayments are probable and the timing and amount of prepayments can be reasonably estimated, we consider estimates of future principal prepayments in the calculation of the constant effective yield necessary to apply the interest method. Therefore, we amortize or accrete premiums and discounts on MBS and ABS to interest income at an individual security level using a level-yield methodology over the estimated remaining cash flows of each security.security using a level-yield under the retrospective interest method. This method requires that we estimate prepayments over the estimated life of the securities and make a retrospective adjustment ofretrospectively adjust the effective yield each time we change the estimated remaining cash flows of the securitieschange as if the new estimatesestimate had been used since the original acquisition date. Changes in interest rates are a significant assumption used in estimating the timing and amount of prepayments.

We amortize the purchased premium on callable non-MBS debt securities at an individual security level using a level-yield methodology to the earliest call date. For all other non-MBS investments, we amortize or accrete premiums and discounts on all other investments at an individual security level using a level-yield methodology over the contractual life of the securities, under which prepaymentssecurities. Prepayments on all non-MBS investments are not estimated but only taken into account as they actually occur.

Gains and Losses on Sales. We compute gains and losses on sales of investment securities using the specific identification method and include these gains and losses in other income as net realized gains (losses) from sale of securities.

Investment Securities - Other-Than-Temporary Impairment. On January 1, 2020, the accounting guidance related to OTTI for investments was superseded. Under prior guidance, on a quarterly basis, we evaluateevaluated our individual AFS and HTM securities that havehad been previously OTTI or arewere in an unrealized loss position to determine if any such securities arewere OTTI. A security iswas in an unrealized loss position (i.e., impaired) when its estimated fair value iswas less than its amortized cost. We considerconsidered an impaired debt security to be OTTI under any of the following conditions:
 
we intendintended to sell the debt security; 
based on available evidence, we believebelieved it iswas more likely than not that we will be required to sell the debt security before the anticipated recovery of its remaining amortized cost; or 
we dodid not expect to recover the entire amortized cost of the debt security.

Recognition of OTTI. If either of the first two conditions above iswere met, we recognizerecognized an OTTI loss in earnings equal to the entire difference between the debt security's amortized cost and its estimated fair value as of the statement of condition date. For those impaired securities that meetmet neither of these two conditions, we performperformed a cash flow analysis to determine whether we expectexpected to recover the entire amortized cost of each security.

If the present value of the cash flows expected to be collected iswas less than the amortized cost of the debt security, a credit loss equal to that difference iswas recorded, and the carrying value of the debt security iswas adjusted to its estimated fair value. However, rather than recognizing the entire difference between the amortized cost and estimated fair value in earnings, only the amount of the impairment representing the credit loss (i.e., the credit component) iswas recognized in earnings, while the remaining amount, if any, related to all other factors (i.e., the non-credit component) iswas recognized in OCI. The credit loss on a debt security iswas capped at the amount of that security's unrealized loss. The new amortized cost basis of the OTTI security, which reflectsreflected the credit loss, willwould not be adjusted for any subsequent recoveries of fair value.
97
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The total OTTI loss iswas included in other income with an offset for the portion recognized in OCI. The remaining amount representsrepresented the credit loss.

Additional OTTI. Subsequent to any recognition of OTTI, if the present value of cash flows expected to be collected iswas less than the amortized cost basis (which reflectsreflected previous credit losses), we recordrecorded an additional credit loss equal to that difference as additional OTTI. The total amount of additional OTTI (both credit and non-credit component, if any) iswas determined as the difference between the security's amortized cost, less the amount of OTTI recognized in AOCI prior to the determination of this additional OTTI, and its fair value. For certain AFS or HTM securities that were previously impaired and have subsequently incurred additional credit losses, an amount equal to the additional credit losses, up to the amount of non-credit losses remaining in AOCI, iswas reclassified out of AOCI and into other income.


108
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Subsequent increases and decreases (if not an additional OTTI) in the estimated fair value of OTTI AFS securities arewere netted against the non-credit component of OTTI recognized previously in AOCI. For HTM securities, the OTTI in AOCI iswas accreted to the carrying value of each security on a prospective basis, based on the amount and timing of future projected cash flows (with no effect on earnings unless the security iswas subsequently sold, maturesmatured or additional OTTI iswas recognized). For debt securities classified as AFS, we dodid not accrete the OTTI in AOCI to the carrying value because the subsequent measurement basis for these securities iswas the estimated fair value.

Interest Income Recognition. As of the initial OTTI measurement date, a new accretable yield iswas calculated for the OTTI debt security. This yield iswas then used to calculate the portion of the credit losses included in the amortized cost of the security to be recognized into interest income each period over the remaining life of the security so as to match the amount and timing of future cash flows expected to be collected.

On a quarterly basis, we re-evaluatere-evaluated the estimated cash flows and accretable yield. If there iswas no additional OTTI and there iswas either (i) a significant increase in the security's expected cash flows or (ii) a favorable change in the timing and amount of the security's expected cash flows, we adjustadjusted the accretable yield on a prospective basis.

Advances. We record advances at amortized cost, adjusted for unamortized premiums, discounts, prepayment fees,to include swap termination fees unearned commitmentassociated with modified advances, net of deferred prepayment fees, and fair-value hedging basis adjustments. We amortize or accrete premiums, discounts,such fees and hedging basis adjustments deferred prepayment fees and deferred swap termination fees, and recognize unearned commitment fees, to interest income using a level-yield methodology over the contractual life of the advance. When an advance is prepaid, we amortize to interest income a proportionate share of allthe remaining balance of those adjustments to amortized cost. We record interest on advances to interest income as earned.

Prepayment Fees. We charge a borrower a prepayment fee when the borrower repays certain advances prior to maturity. We report prepayment fees, net of any associated swap termination fees and hedging basis adjustments.adjustments, in interest income on advances.

Advance Modifications. When we fund a new advance concurrent with, or within a short period of time after, the prepayment of an original advance, we determine whether the transaction is effectively either (i) two separate transactions (the prepayment of the original advance and the disbursement of a new advance), defined as an advance extinguishment, or (ii) the continuation of the original advance as modified, defined as an advance modification.

We account for the transaction as an extinguishment if both of the following criteria are met: (i) the effective yield of the new advance is at least equal to the effective yield for a comparable advance to a member with similar collection risks who is not prepaying, and (ii) modifications of the original advance are determined to be more than minor, i.e., if the present value of the cash flows under the terms of the new advance is at least 10% different from the present value of the remaining cash flows under the original advance or through an evaluation of qualitative factors, which may include changes in the interest-rate exposure to the member by moving from a fixed to an adjustable rateadjustable-rate advance. In all other instances, the transaction is accounted for as an advance modification.


98
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

If the transaction is determined to be an advance extinguishment, we recognize income from nonrefundable prepayment fees, net of associated swap termination fees, in the period that the extinguishment occurs. Alternatively, if no prepayment fees are received (e.g., the member requests that we embed the prepayment fee into the rate of the new advance), the excess of the present value of the cash flows of the new advance over thatthose of an advance with a current market rate advance ofand otherwise comparable terms is immediately recognized in current income, and the basis of the new advance is adjusted accordingly.

If the transaction is determined to be an advance modification, the receipt of nonrefundable prepayment fees, net of swap termination fees, associated with the modification of the original advance isare not immediately recognized in current income but isare (i) included in the carrying value of the modified advance and amortized into interest income over the life of the new advance using a level-yield methodology or (ii) embedded into the rate of the modified advance and recorded as an adjustment to the interest accrual.


109
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Allowance for Credit Losses. As a result of adopting new accounting guidance on January 1, 2020, our advances are evaluated quarterly for expected credit losses on a collective, or pooled, basis unless an individual assessment is deemed necessary, e.g. the advances do not possess similar risk characteristics. If any credit losses are expected, an allowance for credit losses is recorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, which is measured separately.

Prior to January 1, 2020, we recorded an allowance for credit losses on advances only if it was probable a loss had been incurred as of the statement of condition date and the amount of loss could be reasonably estimated. For more information on the allowance methodology related to advances, see Note 5 - Advances.

Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. We classify mortgage loans, for which we have the positive intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future or until maturity or payoff, as held for portfolio. Accordingly, these mortgage loans are reported at cost, adjusted forto include premiums paid to and discounts received from PFIs, hedging basis adjustments, and the allowance for loancredit losses.

We amortize or accrete premiums and discounts, certain loan fees or costs, and hedging basis adjustments to interest income using a level-yield methodology over the contractual life of the loans. When a loan is prepaid, we amortize to interest income a proportionate share of allthe remaining balance of those adjustments to the loan's amortized cost to interest income.cost.

Non-accrual Loans. We place a conventional mortgage loan on non-accrual status if it is determined that either (i) the collection of interest or principal is doubtful, or (ii) interest or principal is past due for 90 days or more, except when the loan is well secured and in the process of collection (e.g., through credit enhancements and monthly servicer remittances on a scheduled/scheduled basis). On loans with remittances on a scheduled/scheduled basis, we receive monthly principal and interest payments from the servicer regardless of whether the borrower has made payments to the servicer. Monthly servicer remittances on loans on an actual/actual basis may also be well secured; however, servicers on actual/actual remittance do not advance principal and interest due, regardless of borrower creditworthiness, until the payments are received from the borrower or when the loan is repaid. As a result, these loans are placed on non-accrual status once they become 90 days delinquent.

A government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loan is not placed on non-accrual status when the collection of the contractual principal or interest is 90 days or more past due because of the contractual obligation of the loan servicer to pay defaulted interest at the contractual rate.

For those mortgage loans placed on non-accrual status, accrued but uncollected interest is reversed against interest income (for any interest accrued in the current year) and/or the allowance for loancredit losses (for any interest accrued in the previous year). We record cash payments received on non-accrual loans as a direct reduction of the recorded investment in the loan. When the recorded investment has been fully collected, any additional amounts collected are recognized as interest income. A loan on non-accrual status may be restored to accrual status when it becomes current (zero days past due) and three consecutive and timely monthly payments have been received. Otherwise, we record cash payments received on non-accrual loans as a direct reduction of the amortized cost of the loan. When the amortized cost has been fully collected, any additional amounts collected are recognized as interest income.

REO. Our MPP was designed to require loan servicers to foreclose and liquidate in the servicer's name rather than in ourthe Bank's name. Therefore, we do not take title to any foreclosed property or enter into any other legal agreement under which the borrower conveys all interest in the property to usthe Bank to satisfy the loan. Upon completion of a triggering event (short sale, deed in lieu of foreclosure, foreclosure sale or post-sale confirmation or ratification, as applicable), the servicer is required to remit to us the full UPB and accrued interest at the next feasible remittance. Upon full receipt, the mortgage loan is derecognized from the statement of condition. As a result of these factors, we do not classify as REO any foreclosed properties collateralizing MPP loans that were previously recorded on our statement of condition.

In the case of a delay in receiving final payoff from the servicer beyond the second remittance cycle after a triggering event, we reclassify the amount owed from mortgage loans to a separate amount receivable from the servicer. The receivable is then evaluated for the amount expected to be recovered.


99110
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Under the MPF Program, REO is recorded in other assets and includes assets that have been received in satisfaction of debt through foreclosures. REO is recorded at the lower of cost or fair value less estimated selling costs. We recognize a charge-off to the allowance for credit losses if the fair value of the REO less estimated selling costs is less than the recorded investment inamortized cost of the loan at the date of the transfer from mortgage loans to REO. Any subsequent gains, losses, and carrying costs are included in other expense.

Loan Participations. We may sell participating interests in MPP loans acquired from our PFIs to other FHLBanks. The terms of the sale of these participating interests meet the accounting requirements for a sale and, therefore, the participating interests are de-recognizedderecognized from our reported mortgage loan balances and a pro-rata portion of the fixed LRA is assumed by the participating FHLBank for its use in loss mitigation. As a result, available funds remaining in our LRA are limited to our pro-rata portion of the fixed LRA that is associated with the participating interests retained by us. The portion of the participation fees received related to our upfront costs is recognized immediately into income, while the remaining portion related to our ongoing costs is deferred and amortized to income over the remaining life of the participated loans.

Allowance for Credit Losses.As a result of adopting new accounting guidance on January 1, 2020, on a quarterly basis, we apply a systematic approach for estimating expected credit losses on our conventional mortgage loans over their estimated remaining lives through analyses that include, among other considerations, various loan portfolio and collateral-related characteristics, past loan performance, current and historical economic conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts of expected economic conditions. An allowance for credit losses is separately establishedrecorded with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for each identified portfolio segmentcredit losses.

We estimate expected losses on our conventional mortgage loans on a collective basis, pooling loans with similar risk characteristics. If a mortgage loan no longer shares risk characteristics with other loans, it is removed from the pool and evaluated for expected losses on an individual basis. In addition, we individually evaluate all TDRs, any remaining exposure to delinquent conventional MPP loans paid in full by servicers, and collateral-dependent loans. Loans are considered collateral-dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property, i.e., there is no other available and reliable source of repayment (including LRA and SMI). We estimate expected losses on collateral-dependent loans by applying a practical expedient that considers the expected loss of a collateral-dependent loan to be equal to the difference between the amortized cost of the loan and the estimated fair value of the collateral, less estimated selling costs.

When determining the allowance for credit losses, we consider how credit enhancements are expected to mitigate credit losses and reduce the allowance accordingly.

If a loan is purchased at a discount, the discount does not offset the allowance for credit losses.

The allowance excludes uncollectible accrued interest receivable, as we charge off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income if a mortgage loan is placed on non-accrual status.

Prior to January 1, 2020, we recorded an allowance for credit losses on mortgage loans only if it iswas probable that impairment has occurreda loss had been incurred as of the statement of condition date and the amount of loss canover a loss emergence period of 24 months could be reasonably estimated. Losses shall not be recognized before it is probable that they have been incurred, even though it may be probable based on past experience that losses will be incurred in the future.

Portfolio Segments. A portfolio segment is defined asFor more information on the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematicallowance methodology for determining its allowance for credit losses. We have developed and documented a systematic methodology for determining an allowance for credit losses, where applicable, for (i) credit products (advances, letters of credit, and other extensions of creditrelated to members); (ii) term securities purchased under agreements to resell and term federal funds sold; (iii) government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans, held for portfolio; and (iv) conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio. For details on each segment's allowance methodology, see Note 76 - AllowanceMortgage Loans Held for Credit Losses.

Classes of Financing Receivables. Classes of financing receivables generally are a disaggregation of a portfolio segment to the extent that they are needed to understand the exposure to credit risk arising from these financing receivables. We determined that no further disaggregation of our portfolio segments is needed, as the credit risk arising from these financing receivables is adequately assessed and measured at the portfolio segment level.Portfolio.

Troubled Debt Restructuring. A TDR related to MPP loans typically occurs when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that would not have been otherwise considered. Although we do not participate in government-sponsored loan modification programs, we do consider certain conventional loan modifications to be TDRs when the modification agreement permits the recapitalization of past due amounts, generally up to the original loan amount. If a borrower is having financial difficulty and a significant concession has been granted by the PFI with our approval, the loan modification is considered a TDR. No other terms of the original loan are modified, except for the possible extension of the contractual maturity date on a case-by-case basis. In no event does the borrower's original interest rate change.


111
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

As a result of new accounting guidance effective in March 2020, we are currently excluding all qualifying COVID-19-related loan modifications considered to be formal, i.e. the legal terms of the loan were changed, from TDR classification and accounting. We do not consider any short-term, informal, i.e. the legal terms of the loan have not changed, modifications or payment deferrals alone to be a TDR. For more information on the impact of this guidance, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

MPP loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings without a reaffirmation of the debt are considered TDRs unless they are covered by SMI policies. Loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings with SMI policies are also considered to be TDRs unless (i) we will not suffer more than an insignificant delay in receiving all principal and interest due or (ii) we are not relinquishing a legal right to pursue the borrower for deficiencies for those loans not affirmed.

TDRs related to MPF Program loans occur when a concession is granted to a borrower for economic or legal reasons related to the borrower's financial difficulties that would not have been otherwise considered. Such TDRs generally involve modifying the borrower's monthly payment for a period of up to 36 months. MPF Program loans discharged in Chapter 7 bankruptcy proceedings without a reaffirmation of the debt are also considered TDRs.

For both the MPP and the MPF Program, modifications of government loans are not considered or accounted for as TDRs because we anticipate no loss of principal or interest accrued at the original contract rate, or significant delay, due to the government guarantee or insurance.


100
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Impairment Methodology. A loan is considered impaired when, based on current and historical information and events, it is probable that not all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will be collected.

Loans that are considered collateral dependent are subject to individual evaluation for impairment instead of collective evaluation. Loans are considered collateral dependent if repayment is expected to be provided solely by the sale of the underlying property, i.e., there is no other available and reliable source of repayment (including LRA and SMI). We consider all impaired loans to be collateral dependent and, therefore, measure impairment based on the fair value of the underlying collateral less costs to sell.

Interest income on impaired loans is recognized in the same manner as non-accrual loans.

Charge-Off Policy.Charge-Offs. A charge-off is recorded to the extent that the recorded investmentamortized cost (including UPB, accrued interest, unamortized premiums or discounts, and hedging basis adjustments) in a loan will not be fully recovered. We record a charge-off on a conventional mortgage loan against the loancredit loss allowance upon the occurrence of a confirming event. Confirming events include, but are not limited to, the settlement of a claim against any of the credit enhancements, delinquency in excess of 180 days unless we can clearly document that the delinquent loan is well-secured and in-process of collection, and filing for bankruptcy protection. We charge-offcharge off the portion of the outstanding conventional mortgage loan balance in excess of the fair value of the underlying property, less costcosts to sell and adjusted for any available credit enhancements.

Derivatives and Hedging Activities. We record derivative instruments, related cash collateral (including initial andmargin received or pledged/posted), variation margin received or pledged/posted)posted, and associated accrued interest on a net basis, by clearing agent and/or by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met, as either derivative assets or derivative liabilities at their estimated fair values. For derivative instruments that meet the netting requirements, any excess cash collateral received or pledged is recognized as a derivative liability or derivative asset, respectively.

Cash flows associated with derivatives are reported as cash flows from operating activities in the statement of cash flows unless the derivatives contain financing elements, in which case they are reflected as cash flows from financing activities. Derivative instruments that include non-standard terms, or require an upfront cash payment, or both, often contain a financing element.

Designations. Each derivative is designated as one of the following:

(i)a qualifying fair-value hedge of the change in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, an unrecognized firm commitment, or a forecasted transaction (a fair-value hedge); or
(ii)a non-qualifying hedge (economic hedge) for asset/liability management purposes.

Derivatives are recorded beginning on the trade date and typically executed and designated in a qualifying hedging relationship at the same time as the acquisition of the hedged item. We may also designate the hedging relationship upon the Bank's commitment to disburse an advance, purchase financial instruments, or trade a consolidated obligation in which settlement occurs within the shortest period of time possible for the type of instrument based on market settlement conventions. Each derivative is designated as one of the following:

(i)a qualifying fair-value hedge of the change in fair value of a recognized asset or liability, an unrecognized firm commitment, or a forecasted transaction (a fair-value hedge); or
(ii)a non-qualifying hedge (economic hedge) for asset/liability management purposes.

Accounting for Qualifying Hedges. Hedging relationships must meet certain criteria including, but not limited to, formal documentation of the hedging relationship and an expectation to be highly effective to qualify for hedge accounting. Two approaches to hedge accounting include:

(i)Long-haul hedge accounting - The application of long-haul hedge accounting requires us to assess (both at the hedge's inception and at least quarterly) whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of hedged items or forecasted transactions and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods; or 
(ii)Shortcut hedge accounting - Transactions that meet certain criteria qualify for the shortcut method of hedge accounting in whichaccounting. Under the shortcut method, an assumption can be made that the entire change in fair value of a hedged item, due to changes in the benchmark rate, equates to the entire change in fair value of the related derivative. Therefore, the derivative is considered to be perfectly effective in achieving offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability attributable to the hedged risk. When applying the shortcut method, we document, at hedge inception, a quantitative long-haul method that we can apply should we subsequently determine a derivative relationship no longer qualifies for shortcut hedge accounting; or

101112
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

(ii)Long-haul hedge accounting - The application of long-haul hedge accounting requires us to assess (both at the hedge's inception and at least quarterly) whether the derivatives used in hedging transactions are highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of hedged items or forecasted transactions attributable to the hedged risk and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods.

Beginning January 1, 2019, changes in the fair value of a derivative that is designated and qualifies as a fair-value hedge, along with changes in the fair value of the hedged asset or liability that are attributable to the hedged risk, are recorded in net interest income in the same line as the earnings effect of the hedged item.

Prior to January 1, 2019, any hedge ineffectiveness (which represented the amount by which the change in the fair value of the derivative differed from the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk) was recorded in other income as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities.

For more information on the change in presentation of gains (losses) on our derivatives in qualifying hedge relationships, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

Accounting for Non-Qualifying Hedges. An economic hedge is defined as a derivative that hedges specific or non-specific underlying assets, liabilities, or firm commitments and does not qualify, or was not designated, for hedge accounting. As a result, we recognize only the net interest settlements and the change in fair value of these derivatives in other income as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities with no offsetting fair-value adjustments in earnings for the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments. An economic hedge by definition, therefore, introduces the potential for earnings variability.

Accrued Interest Receivables and Payables. The difference between the interest receivable and payable on a derivative designated as a qualifying hedge is recognized as an adjustment to the income or expense of the designated hedged item. The difference between the interest receivable and payable on economic hedges are recognized in other income as net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities.

Discontinuance of Hedge Accounting. We discontinue hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) the hedging relationship ceases to be highly effective; (ii) the derivative and/or the hedged item expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) a hedged firm commitment no longer meets the definition of a firm commitment; or (iv) we elect to discontinue hedge accounting.

When hedge accounting is discontinued, we either terminate the derivative or continue to carry the derivative at its fair value, cease to adjust the hedged asset or liability for changes in fair value and amortize the cumulative basis adjustment on the hedged item into interest income over the remaining life of the hedged item using a level-yield methodology.

Embedded Derivatives. We may issue consolidated obligations, disburse advances, or purchase financial instruments in which a derivative instrument is embedded. In order to determine whether an embedded derivative must be bifurcated from the host instrument and separately valued, we must assess, upon execution of the transaction, whether the economic characteristics of the embedded derivative are clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the remaining component of the consolidated obligation, advance or purchased financial instrument (the host contract) and whether a separate, non-embedded instrument with the same terms as the embedded instrument would meet the definition of a derivative instrument.

If we determine that (i) the embedded derivative has economic characteristics that are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract and (ii) a separate, stand-alone instrument with the same terms would qualify as a derivative instrument, the embedded derivative is separated from the host contract, carried at fair value, and designated as a stand-alone derivative instrument pursuant to an economic hedge, and the host contract is accounted for based on the guidance applicable to instruments of that type that are not hedged. However, if (i) the entire contract (the host contract and the embedded derivative) is required to be measured at fair value, with changes in fair value reported in earnings (such as an investment security classified as trading), or (ii) we cannot reliably identify and measure the embedded derivative for purposes of separating that derivative from its host contract, the entire contract is carried at fair value, and no portion of the contract is designated as a hedging instrument.

Financial Instruments Meeting Netting Requirements. We present certain financial instruments, including our derivative asset and liability positions as well as cash collateral received or pledged, on a net basis when we have a legal right of offset and all other requirements for netting are met (collectively referred to as the netting requirements).


113
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The net exposure for these financial instruments can change on a daily basis; therefore, there may be a delay between the time a change in the exposure is identified and additional collateral is requested, and the time the additional collateral is received or pledged. Likewise, there may be a delay before excess collateral is returned. For derivative instruments that meet the netting requirements, any excess cash collateral received or pledged is recognized as a derivative liability or derivative asset, respectively. For derivative instruments that do not meet the netting requirements, cash collateral is recognized as an interest-bearing asset or liability, as appropriate. Additional information regarding these transactions is provided in Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities.

102
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Premises, Software, and Equipment. We record premises, software, and equipment at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization,amortization, and compute depreciation and amortization using the straight-line method over their respective estimated useful lives, which range from 3 to 40 years. WeWe capitalize improvements and major renewals, but expense maintenance and repairs when incurred. We depreciate building improvements using the straight-line method over the estimated useful life of the improvement. In addition, we capitalize software development costs for internal use software with an estimated economic useful life of at least one year. If capitalized, we use the straight-line method for computing amortization. We include any gain or loss on disposal (other than abandonment) of premises, software, and equipment in other income. Any loss on abandonment is included in other operating expenses.

Consolidated Obligations. Consolidated obligations are recorded at amortized cost, adjusted forto include concessions, accretion of discounts, amortization of premiums, principal payments, and fair-value hedging basis adjustments.

Discounts and Premiums. We accrete or amortize or accretethe discounts and premiums as well as hedging basis adjustments to interest expense using a level-yield methodology over the term to contractual maturity of the corresponding CO bonds. When we prepay a CO bond, a proportionate share of any remaining balance of premium or discount is recognized.recognized immediately.

Concessions. Concessions are paid to dealers in connection with the issuance of certain consolidated obligations. The Office of Finance prorates the amount of our concession based upon the percentage of the debt issued on ourthe Bank's behalf. We record concessions paid on consolidated obligations as a direct deduction from their carrying amounts, consistent with the presentation of discounts on consolidated obligations. The concessions are deferred and amortized, using a level-yield methodology, to interest expense over the term to contractual maturity of the corresponding consolidated obligations. When we prepay a CO bond, a proportionate share of any remaining concessionbalance of concessions is recognized.recognized as interest expense.

Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures. As a result of adopting new accounting guidance on January 1, 2020, we evaluate the Bank's off-balance sheet credit exposures on a quarterly basis for expected credit losses. If deemed necessary, an allowance for expected credit losses is recorded in other liabilities with a corresponding adjustment to the provision for credit losses.

Prior to January 1, 2020, we recorded an allowance for credit losses in other liabilities for our off-balance sheet credit exposures only if it was probable a loss had been incurred as of the statement of condition date and the amount of loss could be reasonably estimated. For more information on the allowance methodology applied to our off-balance sheet credit exposures, see Note 17 - Commitments and Contingencies.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. When a member withdraws or attains non-member status by merger or acquisition, charter termination, relocation or other involuntary termination from membership, the member's shares are then subject to redemption, at which time a five-year redemption period commences.commences for Class B stock. Since the shares meet the definition of a mandatorily redeemable financial instrument, the shares are reclassified from capital to liabilities as MRCS at estimated fair value, which is equal to par value. Dividends declared on shares classified as a liability are accrued at the expected dividend rate and reported as interest expense.

We reclassify MRCS from liabilities to capital when non-members subsequently become members through either acquisition, merger, or election. After the reclassification, dividends declared on that capital stock are no longer classified as interest expense.

Restricted Retained Earnings. In accordance with our JCE Agreement, we allocate 20% of the Bank's net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least 1% of the average balance of the Bank's outstanding consolidated obligations for the current quarter.

114
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Employee Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans. We recognize the required contribution to the DB Plan ratably over the plan year to which it relates. Without a prefunding election, any contribution made in excess of the minimum required contribution is recorded as an expense in the quarterly reporting period in which the contribution is made; with a prefunding election, such excess contribution is recorded as a prepaid asset.

Restricted Retained Earnings. In accordance with the Bank's JCE Agreement, we allocate 20% of our net income each quarter to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account equals at least 1% of the average balance of our outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter.

Gains on Litigation Settlements. Litigation settlement gains, net of related legal fees and litigation expenses, are recorded in other income when realized. A litigation settlement gain is considered realized when we receive cash or assets that are readily convertible to known amounts of cash or claims to cash. In addition, a settlement gain is considered realized when we enter into a signed agreement not subject to appeal, the counterparty has the ability to pay, and the amount to be received can be reasonably estimated. Prior to being realized, we consider potential litigation settlement gains to be gain contingencies and, therefore, they are not recorded in the statement of income.

Finance Agency Expenses. The portion of the Finance Agency's expenses and working capital fund not allocated to Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae is allocated among the FHLBanks as assessments, which are based on the ratio of each FHLBank's minimum required regulatory capital to the aggregate minimum required regulatory capital of every FHLBank. We record our share of these assessments in other expenses.
 
103
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial StatementsOffi, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Officece of Finance Expenses. Our proportionate share of the Office of Finance's operating and capital expenditures is calculated based upon 2 components as follows: (i) two-thirds based on our share of total consolidated obligations outstanding and (ii) one-third basedbased on equal pro ratapro-rata allocation. We record our share of these expenditures in other expenses.

Cash Flows. We consider cash and due from banks on the statement of condition as cash and cash equivalents within the statement of cash flows because of their highly liquid nature. Federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and interest-bearing deposits are not treated as cash and cash equivalents, but instead are treated as short-term investments. Accordingly, their associated cash flows are reported in the investing activities section of the statement of cash flows.

Cash flows associated with derivatives are reported as cash flows from operating activities in the statement of cash flows unless the derivatives contain financing elements, in which case they are reflected as cash flows from financing activities. Derivative instruments that include non-standard terms, or require an upfront cash payment, or both, often contain a financing element.

Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance

Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance.

Leases (ASU 2016-02). On February 25, 2016, the FASB issued guidance that requires a lessee, in an operating or finance lease, to recognize on the statement of condition a liability to make lease payments and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term. However, for a lease with a term of 12 months or less, a lessee is permitted to make an accounting policy election not to recognize a lease asset and lease liability. Under previous guidance, a lessee was not required to recognize a lease asset and lease liability arising from an operating lease on the statement of condition. While this guidance does not fundamentally change lessor accounting, some changes have been made to align that guidance with the lessee guidance and other areas within GAAP.

This guidance was effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019. Upon adoption of this guidance on a prospective basis, we reported higher assets and liabilities as a result of including right-of-use assets and lease liabilities on the statement of condition, but its effect on our financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows was not material.

Premium Amortization on Purchased Callable Debt Securities (ASU 2017-08).On March 30, 2017, the FASB issued guidance to shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities purchased at a premium. Specifically, the guidance requires the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. No change is required for securities purchased at a discount, which continue to be amortized to their contractual maturities.

This guidance was effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Targeted Improvements to Accounting for Hedging Activities (ASU 2017-12). On August 28, 2017, the FASB issued amended guidance to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity's risk management activities in its financial statements. This guidance requires that, for fair-value hedges, the entire change in the fair value of the hedging instrument, along with the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk, be presented in the same income statement line that is used to present the earnings effect of the hedged item.

This guidance was effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on our financial condition, net income, or cash flows. However, the adoption resulted in a prospective change in the statement of income for qualifying fair-value hedging relationships in which the gains and losses resulting from the changes in the fair value of the hedging instruments and the changes in the fair value of the associated hedged items attributable to the hedged risk are reported in interest income instead of in other income. For the year ended December 31, 2019, a net loss of $23,515 was reported in interest income.

Inclusion of SOFR OIS Rate as a Benchmark Interest Rate for Hedge Accounting Purposes (ASU 2018-16). On October 25, 2018, to facilitate the LIBOR to SOFR transition, the FASB issued guidance permitting the use of the OIS rate based on SOFR as an eligible U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes.

This guidance was effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2019, concurrent with the adoption of ASU 2017-12. The adoption of this guidance had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.


104
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Recently Issued Accounting Guidance.

Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13). On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued guidance replacing the current incurred loss model. The guidance requires entities to measure expected credit losses based on consideration of a broad range of relevant information, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount of the financial instrument. Prior to the adoption of this guidance, we recorded an allowance for credit losses (or OTTI for investment securities) if it was probable that a loss had been incurred as of the statement of condition date and the amount of the loss could be reasonably estimated.

This guidance becamewas effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. The guidance should be2020 and was applied using a modified-retrospective approach whereby a cumulative-effect adjustment is recorded to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption.

method. In spite of the requirement to measure expected credit losses over the estimated life of our financial instruments, i.e. advances, mortgage loans, investment securities,interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold, investment securities, advances, and mortgage loans held for portfolio, the adoption of this guidance had no effect on our allowance for credit losses given the specific terms, issuer guarantees, and/or collateralized/secured nature of the instruments, and therefore no effect on our financial condition, results0 cumulative-effect adjustment was recorded to retained earnings as of operations, or cash flows.January 1, 2020.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (ASU 2018-13). On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued guidance to update the disclosure requirements for fair value measurement. This guidance was issued as part of the FASB's disclosure framework project and is intended to improve disclosure effectiveness.

The guidance becamewas effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this guidance will have an
affected our fair-value disclosures, but had no effect on our future disclosures, butfinancial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
115
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (ASU 2018-14).On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued
guidance to modify the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit pension or other postretirement
plans. This guidance was issued as part of the FASB's disclosure framework project and is intended to improve disclosure
effectiveness.

The guidance was effective for the annual period ended December 31, 2020. The adoption of this guidance required us to add a disclosure to describe the reasons for any significant gains and losses related to changes in our benefit obligation and remove an existing disclosure regarding amounts in AOCI expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost over the next fiscal year. The guidance had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Customer's Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract (ASU 2018-15). On August 29, 2018, the FASB issued guidance on implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract. The guidance aligns the requirements for capitalizing such costs with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software and hosting arrangements that include an internal-use software license.

This guidance becamewas effective for the interim and annual periods beginning on January 1, 2020. The adoption of this guidance on a prospective basis had no effect on our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Defined Benefit Plans (ASU 2018-14)The CARES Act and Interagency Statement. On August 28, 2018,March 27, 2020, Section 4013 of the FASB issued guidance to modifyCARES Act was signed into law and provides optional, temporary relief from the disclosureaccounting and reporting requirements for employersTDRs on certain conventional loan modifications related to COVID-19 that sponsor defined benefit pensionare offered by financial institutions, including a forbearance arrangement, an interest rate modification, a repayment plan, or other postretirement plans. This guidance was issuedany similar arrangement that defers or delays payment of principal or interest. To qualify for such relief, a loan must have been current as partof December 31, 2019 and the modification must occur between March 1, 2020 and the earlier of December 31, 2020 or 60 days following the termination of the FASB's disclosure framework project and is intendednational emergency declared by the President of the United States. On December 27, 2020, the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, was signed into law, extending the applicable period to improve disclosure effectiveness.the earlier of January 1, 2022, or 60 days following the termination of the national emergency declared on March 13, 2020.

In addition to the CARES Act, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the FDIC, National Credit Union Administration, OCC, CFPB and the state banking regulators (collectively, the "Banking Agencies") issued a Revised Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus (the "Interagency Statement") in April 2020. The guidanceInteragency Statement primarily offers certain interpretations of existing GAAP relative to conventional loan modifications that occur in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

In the second quarter of 2020, we elected to apply the TDR relief that is effective forprovided by the annual period endedCARES Act and further clarified by the Interagency Statement. As such, all qualifying COVID-19-related loan modifications considered to be formal, i.e. the legal terms of the loan were changed, are excluded from TDR classification and accounting and the payment status of the loan is returned to current. As of December 31, 2020, we had $12,309 of loans outstanding with such formal modifications. For all informal COVID-19-related loan modifications, i.e. the legal terms of the loan were not changed, we continue to follow our existing past-due, non-accrual, TDR and early adoption is permitted; however, we currently plan to adopt this guidance on the effective date. The adoption may have an effect on our disclosures, but will have no effect on our financial condition, resultscharge-off accounting policies as disclosed in Note 1 - Summary of operations, or cash flows.Significant Accounting Policies.


105116
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting (ASU 2020-04).On March 12, 2020, the FASB issued optional guidance for a limited period of time to ease the potential burden in accounting for (or recognizing the effects of) reference rate reform on financial reporting. Specifically, the guidance provides accounting relief related to the following:

Contract modifications. Entities can elect not to apply certain modification accounting requirements to contracts affected by reference rate reform, if certain criteria are met. An entity that makes this election would not have to remeasure the contracts at the modification date or reassess a previous accounting determination.

Hedging relationships. Entities can elect various optional expedients that would allow them to continue applying hedge accounting for hedging relationships affected by reference rate reform, if certain criteria are met.

Sales or transfers of debt securities classified as HTM. Entities can make a one-time election to sell and/or reclassify HTM securities that reference an interest rate affected by reference rate reform and were classified as HTM prior to January 1, 2020.

The guidance is effective from March 12, 2020 through December 31, 2022. We may elect to adopt the guidance for eligible contract modifications and hedging relationships existing as of January 1, 2020 and prospectively thereafter until the expiration date of the guidance.

To date, we have not applied any of the optional expedients and exceptions provided by this guidance. On January 7, 2021, the FASB issued ASU 2021-01 which further clarified and broadened the scope of this guidance.

Reference Rate Reform: Scope (ASU 2021-01).On October 16, 2020, CME and LCH, i.e., the clearinghouses used for all of our cleared derivative transactions, revised their rulebooks to change the discounting and price alignment interest for cleared U.S. dollar interest-rate derivatives from the EFFR to SOFR. On January 7, 2021, the FASB issued guidance, which among other changes, amended the scope of the guidance previously introduced by ASU 2020-04 to allow derivative instruments impacted by changes in the interest rate used for margining, discounting, or price alignment to qualify for the optional relief.

The guidance was effective upon issuance and allows for retrospective or prospective application using the same date parameters as established by the ASU 2020-04 guidance. Upon issuance, we retrospectively adopted this guidance to support our reporting that, on the transition date, the discounting change from EFFR to SOFR did not result in the discontinuance of any impacted hedge relationship.

The mechanisms received from CME and LCH to compensate us for the changes in valuation and risk resulting from their rulebook revisions were not material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Note 3 - Cash and Due from Banks

Compensating Balances. WePeriodically, we maintain cash balances with commercial banks in return for certain services. These agreements contain no legal restrictions on the withdrawal of funds. The average cash balances for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018, were $65,945, $19,420, and 2017, were $19,420, $22,300, and $35,592, respectively.

Pass-through Deposit Reserves. We act as a pass-through correspondent for member institutions required to deposit reserves with the Federal Reserve Banks. The amounts reported as cash and due from banks at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019 include pass-through reserves deposited with the Federal Reserve Banks of $54,264$1,506 and $65,871,$54,264, respectively.

117
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 4 - Investments

Short-term Investments.

We invest in interest-bearing deposits, securities purchased under agreements to resell, and federal funds sold to provide short-term liquidity. These investments are generally transacted with counterparties that maintain a credit rating of triple-B or higher (investment grade) by an NRSRO. At December 31, 2020, NaN of these investments were with counterparties rated below single-A and NaN were with unrated counterparties. The NRSRO ratings may differ from our internal ratings of the investments, if applicable.

Allowance for Credit Losses.

Interest-Bearing Deposits. Interest-bearing deposits are considered overnight investments given our ability to withdraw funds from these accounts at any time. As such, 0 allowance for credit losses was recorded for these investments at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

The carrying values of interest-bearing deposits at December 31, 2020 and 2019 exclude accrued interest receivable of $13 and $1,080, respectively.

Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell. Securities purchased under agreements to resell are structured such that they are evaluated regularly to determine if the market value of the underlying securities decreases below the market value required as collateral (i.e. subject to collateral maintenance provisions). If so, the counterparty must place an equivalent amount of additional securities as collateral or remit an equivalent amount of cash, generally by the next business day. Based upon the collateral held as security and collateral maintenance provisions with our counterparties, 0 allowance for credit losses was recorded for securities purchased under agreements to resell at December 31, 2020 and 2019.

The carrying values of securities purchased under agreements to resell as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 exclude accrued interest receivable of $5 and $65, respectively.

Federal Funds Sold. Federal funds sold are unsecured loans that are generally transacted on an overnight term. Finance Agency regulations include a limit on the amount of unsecured credit an individual FHLBank may extend to a counterparty. All investments in federal funds sold at December 31, 2020 and 2019 were repaid according to the contractual terms and, therefore, 0 allowance for credit losses was recorded.

The carrying values of federal funds sold at December 31, 2020 and 2019 exclude accrued interest receivable of $3 and $111, respectively.

Note 4 - Investment SecuritiesSecurities.

Trading Securities.

In 2019, the Bank began purchasing U.S. Treasury securities to enhance its liquidity and the balance of these securities at December 31, 2019 was $5,016,649.

Net Gains (Losses) on Trading Securities.Major Security Types. The following table presents net gains (losses) onour trading securities, excluding any offsetting effect of gains (losses) on the associated derivatives.
Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
Net unrealized gains on trading securities held at period end$30,705  $—  $—  
Net realized gains on trading securities that sold during the period2,291  —  —  
Net gains on trading securities$32,996  $—  $—  

Available-for-Sale Securities.

Major Security Types.The following table presents ourAFS securities by type of security.
  GrossGross 
AmortizedUnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
December 31, 2019
Cost (1)
GainsLossesFair Value
GSE and TVA debentures$3,885,012  $41,840  $—  $3,926,852  
GSE MBS4,509,653  51,200  (3,227) 4,557,626  
Total AFS securities$8,394,665  $93,040  $(3,227) $8,484,478  
December 31, 2018
GSE and TVA debentures$4,239,622  $37,458  $—  $4,277,080  
GSE MBS3,410,988  27,797  (12,269) 3,426,516  
Total AFS securities$7,650,610  $65,255  $(12,269) $7,703,596  

(1) 
Security TypeDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Non-mortgage-backed securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations$5,094,703 $5,016,649 
Total trading securities at estimated fair value$5,094,703 $5,016,649 
Includes adjustments made to the cost basis for accretion, amortization, collection of principal, and, if applicable, fair-value hedging basis adjustments. Carrying value equals estimated fair value.


106118
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Net Gains (Losses) on Trading Securities. The following table presents net gains (losses) on trading securities, excluding any offsetting effect of gains (losses) on the associated derivatives.
Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net unrealized gains (losses) on trading securities held at year end$(36,994)$30,705 $
Net realized gains on trading securities that matured/sold during the year22,510 2,291 
Net gains (losses) on trading securities$(14,484)$32,996 $

Available-for-Sale Securities.

Major Security Types.The following table presents ourAFS securities by type of security.
  GrossGross 
AmortizedUnrealizedUnrealizedEstimated
December 31, 2020
Cost (1)
GainsLossesFair Value
GSE and TVA debentures$3,462,885 $40,252 $$3,503,137 
GSE MBS6,545,093 98,263 (1,594)6,641,762 
Total AFS securities$10,007,978 $138,515 $(1,594)$10,144,899 
December 31, 2019
GSE and TVA debentures$3,885,012 $41,840 $$3,926,852 
GSE MBS4,509,653 51,200 (3,227)4,557,626 
Total AFS securities$8,394,665 $93,040 $(3,227)$8,484,478 

(1)    Includes adjustments made to the cost basis for purchase discount or premium and related accretion or amortization, and, if applicable, fair-value hedging basis adjustments. Net unamortized premium at December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $16,300 and $5,773, respectively. The applicable fair-value hedging basis adjustments at December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled $627,619 and $150,372, respectively. Excludes accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2020 and 2019 of $34,616 and $32,963, respectively. Carrying value equals estimated fair value.

Unrealized Loss Positions. The following table presents impaired AFS securities (i.e., in an unrealized loss position), aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position.
Less than 12 months12 months or moreTotal Less than 12 months12 months or moreTotal
EstimatedUnrealizedEstimatedUnrealizedEstimatedUnrealized
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020Fair ValueLossesFair ValueLossesFair ValueLosses
GSE MBSGSE MBS$132,054 $(179)$179,387 $(1,415)$311,441 $(1,594)
Total impaired AFS securitiesTotal impaired AFS securities$132,054 $(179)$179,387 $(1,415)$311,441 $(1,594)
EstimatedUnrealizedEstimatedUnrealizedEstimatedUnrealized
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019Fair ValueLossesFair ValueLossesFair ValueLossesDecember 31, 2019
GSE MBSGSE MBS$339,981  $(1,134) $519,446  $(2,093) $859,427  $(3,227) GSE MBS$339,981 $(1,134)$519,446 $(2,093)$859,427 $(3,227)
Total impaired AFS securitiesTotal impaired AFS securities$339,981  $(1,134) $519,446  $(2,093) $859,427  $(3,227) Total impaired AFS securities$339,981 $(1,134)$519,446 $(2,093)$859,427 $(3,227)
December 31, 2018
GSE MBS$1,256,816  $(12,269) $—  $—  $1,256,816  $(12,269) 
Total impaired AFS securities$1,256,816  $(12,269) $—  $—  $1,256,816  $(12,269) 

Realized Gains and Losses. During the year ended December 31, 2020, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold certain of our GSE MBS. Proceeds from the AFS sales totaled $96,779, resulting in net realized gains of $504, comprised of realized gains of $715 and realized losses of $211 determined by the specific identification method.

There were 0 sales during the year ended December 31, 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our AFS investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. None of the OTTI AFS securities sold in 2018 were in an unrealized loss position. Proceeds from the AFS sales totaled $203,841, resulting in realized gains of $32,407 determined by the specific identification method.

119
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Contractual Maturity. The amortized cost and estimated fair value of non-MBS AFS securities are presented below by contractual maturity. MBS are not presented by contractual maturity because their actual maturities will likely differ from their contractual maturities as borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
 AmortizedEstimatedAmortizedEstimated
Year of Contractual MaturityCostFair ValueCostFair Value
Due in 1 year or less$570,209  $571,588  $507,355  $507,832  
Due after 1 year through 5 years1,729,664  1,742,681  1,933,682  1,947,240  
Due after 5 years through 10 years1,489,144  1,514,978  1,646,892  1,668,409  
Due after 10 years95,995  97,605  151,693  153,599  
Total non-MBS3,885,012  3,926,852  4,239,622  4,277,080  
Total MBS4,509,653  4,557,626  3,410,988  3,426,516  
Total AFS securities$8,394,665  $8,484,478  $7,650,610  $7,703,596  

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
 AmortizedEstimatedAmortizedEstimated
Year of Contractual MaturityCostFair ValueCostFair Value
Due in 1 year or less$705,134 $705,442 $570,209 $571,588 
Due after 1 year through 5 years1,215,038 1,225,187 1,729,664 1,742,681 
Due after 5 years through 10 years1,542,713 1,572,508 1,489,144 1,514,978 
Due after 10 years95,995 97,605 
Total non-MBS3,462,885 3,503,137 3,885,012 3,926,852 
Total MBS6,545,093 6,641,762 4,509,653 4,557,626 
Total AFS securities$10,007,978 $10,144,899 $8,394,665 $8,484,478 

Realized Gains and Losses.

There were 0 sales of AFS securities during the years ended December 31, 2019 or 2017. During the year ended December 31, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our AFS and HTM investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. Of the OTTI AFS securities sold in 2018, none were in an unrealized loss position. Proceeds from the AFS sales totaled $203,841, resulting in realized gains of $32,407 determined by the specific identification method.

As of December 31, 2019, we had no intention of selling any AFS securities in an unrealized loss position nor did we consider it more likely than not that we will be required to sell any of these securities before our anticipated recovery of each security's remaining amortized cost basis.

107
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Held-to-Maturity Securities.

Major Security Types. The following table presents our HTM securities by type of security.
  GrossGross 
  UnrecognizedUnrecognizedEstimated
 AmortizedHoldingHoldingFair
December 31, 2019
Cost (1)
GainsLossesValue
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS$3,059,875  $6,948  $(13,217) $3,053,606  
GSE MBS2,156,526  10,117  (4,043) 2,162,600  
Total HTM securities$5,216,401  $17,065  $(17,260) $5,216,206  
December 31, 2018
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS$3,468,882  $11,034  $(1,552) $3,478,364  
GSE MBS2,204,838  7,673  (14,730) 2,197,781  
Total HTM securities$5,673,720  $18,707  $(16,282) $5,676,145  

  GrossGross 
  UnrecognizedUnrecognizedEstimated
 AmortizedHoldingHoldingFair
December 31, 2020
Cost (1)
Gains (2)
Losses (2)
Value
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS$2,622,677 $6,920 $(4,590)$2,625,007 
GSE MBS2,078,625 21,640 (1,476)2,098,789 
Total HTM securities$4,701,302 $28,560 $(6,066)$4,723,796 
December 31, 2019
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS$3,059,875 $6,948 $(13,217)$3,053,606 
GSE MBS2,156,526 10,117 (4,043)2,162,600 
Total HTM securities (3)
$5,216,401 $17,065 $(17,260)$5,216,206 

(1)    Carrying value equals amortized cost, which includes adjustments made to the cost basis for purchase discount or premium and related accretion amortizationor amortization. Net unamortized premium at December 31, 2020 and collection2019 totaled $7,101 and $8,418, respectively. Excludes accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2020 and 2019 of principal.$2,689 and $7,156, respectively.

(2)    
Gross unrecognized holding gains (losses) represent the cumulative increases (decreases) in estimated fair value.
Unrealized Loss Positions.(3)     The following table presents impairedTotal HTM securities (i.e.,as of December 31, 2019 in an unrealized loss position)position for less than 12 months had an estimated fair value of $1,494,740 and unrealized losses of $8,923, aggregated by major security type and length of time that individual securities have beenwhile those in a continuousan unrealized loss position.position for 12 months or more had an estimated fair value of
 Less than 12 months12 months or MoreTotal
 EstimatedUnrealizedEstimatedUnrealizedEstimatedUnrealized
December 31, 2019Fair ValueLossesFair ValueLossesFair ValueLosses
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS$656,398  $(6,728) $1,009,661  $(6,489) $1,666,059  $(13,217) 
GSE MBS838,342  (2,195) 288,567  (1,848) 1,126,909  (4,043) 
Total impaired HTM securities$1,494,740  $(8,923) $1,298,228  $(8,337) $2,792,968  $(17,260) 
December 31, 2018
MBS:
Other U.S. obligations - guaranteed MBS$829,121  $(873) $417,952  $(679) $1,247,073  $(1,552) 
GSE MBS435,756  (890) 716,647  (13,840) 1,152,403  (14,730) 
Total impaired HTM securities$1,264,877  $(1,763) $1,134,599  $(14,519) $2,399,476  $(16,282) 

Contractual Maturity.$1,298,228 MBS and ABS are not presented by contractual maturity because their actual maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as certain borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.unrealized losses of $8,337.
Realized Gains and Losses. There were 0 sales of HTM securities during the years ended December 31, 20192020 or 2017.2019. During the year ended December 31, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our AFS and HTM investments in private-label RMBS and ABS. The amortized cost of the HTM securities sold totaled $41,271. Proceeds from the HTM sales totaledtotaled $41,226, resulting in realized losses of $45 determined by the specific identification method. For each of these HTM securities, we had previously collected at least 85% of the principal outstanding at the time of acquisition due to prepayments or scheduled payments over the term. As such, the sales were considered maturities for purposes of security classification.

Contractual Maturity. MBS are not presented by contractual maturity because their actual maturities will likely differ from contractual maturities as borrowers have the right to prepay their obligations with or without prepayment fees.

108
120
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

As ofAllowance for Credit Losses on Investment Securities.At December 31, 2019,2020, 100% of our AFS and HTM securities were rated single-A, or above, by an NRSRO, based on the lowest long-term credit rating for each security. These may differ for any internal ratings of the securities, if applicable.

AFS Securities. At December 31, 2020, certain of our AFS securities were in an unrealized loss position; however, we did not record an allowance for credit losses because these losses are considered temporary and we expect to recover the entire amortized cost basis on these securities based upon the following factors: (i) all securities were highly-rated, (ii) we have not experienced, nor do we expect, any payment defaults on the securities, (iii) the U.S., GSE, and other agency obligations carry an explicit or implicit government guarantee such that the we consider the risk of nonpayment to be zero, and (iv) we had no intention of selling any HTMof these securities nor did we consider it more likely than not that we will be required to sell any HTMof these securities in an unrealized loss position before our anticipated recovery of each security's remaining amortized cost basis.

Other-Than-Temporary Impairment.

OTTI Evaluation ProcessHTM Securities. At December 31, 2020, we did 0t establish an allowance for credit losses on any of our HTM securities based on the following factors: (i) all securities were highly-rated, (ii) we have not experienced, nor do we expect, any payment defaults on the securities, (iii) the U.S., GSE, and Results - Private-label RMBSother agency obligations carry an explicit or implicit government guarantee such that we consider the risk of nonpayment to be zero, and ABS.(iv) we had no intention of selling any of these securities nor did we consider it more likely than not that we will be required to sell any of these securities.

Results ofUnder the previous security impairment methodology for AFS and HTM securities, the Bank did 0t recognize any OTTI Evaluation Process - Private-label RMBS and ABS. Prior to the decision to sell all of our private-label RMBS and ABS in 2018, we performed cash flow analyses to determine whether we expected to recover the entire amortized cost of each security. As a result of our analyses, we recognized credit losses during the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 of $0 and $207, respectively. During those periods, we determined that the unrealized losses on any remaining private-label RMBS and ABS were temporary as we expected to recover the entire amortized cost.2019 or 2018.

The following table presents a rollforward of the amounts related to credit losses recognized in earnings.
Credit Loss Rollforward20182017
Balance at beginning of year$44,935  $51,514  
Additions:
Additional credit losses for which OTTI was previously recognized (1)
—  207  
Reductions:
Credit losses on securities sold, matured, paid down or prepaid(43,049) —  
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected (accreted as interest income over the remaining lives of the applicable securities)(1,886) (6,786) 
Balance at end of year$—  $44,935  

(1) 
Credit Loss Rollforward2018
Balance at beginning of year$44,935 
Reductions:
Credit losses on securities sold, matured, paid down or prepaid(43,049)
Increases in cash flows expected to be collected (accreted as interest income over the remaining lives of the applicable securities)(1,886)
Balance at end of year$
Relates to all securities impaired prior to January 1, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Evaluation Process and Results - All Other Investment Securities.

Other U.S. and GSE Obligations and TVA Debentures. For other U.S. obligations, GSE obligations, and TVA debentures, we determined that, based on current expectations, the strength of the issuers' guarantees through direct obligations of or explicit or implicit support from the United States government is sufficient to protect us from any losses. As a result, all of the gross unrealized losses as of December 31, 2019 are considered temporary.

109121
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 5 - Advances

We offer a wide range of fixed- and adjustable-rate advance products with various maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics and optionality. Adjustable-rate advances have interest rates that reset periodically at a fixed spread to LIBOR or another specified index, including SOFR. Longer-term advances may be available subject to market conditions for both fixed-rate and adjustable-rate products.

The following table presents advances outstanding by redemption term.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Redemption TermAmountWAIR %AmountWAIR %
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts$37  3.99  $—  —  
Due in 1 year or less11,791,716  1.85  15,595,985  2.47  
Due after 1 year through 2 years2,106,315  2.12  2,957,861  2.19  
Due after 2 years through 3 years2,505,693  2.16  2,444,486  2.46  
Due after 3 years through 4 years2,625,446  2.44  2,139,695  2.36  
Due after 4 years through 5 years4,076,103  2.08  1,977,925  2.76  
Thereafter9,166,357  1.89  7,713,409  2.41  
Total advances, par value32,271,667  1.98  32,829,361  2.44  
Fair-value hedging basis adjustments, net207,111   (106,499)  
Unamortized swap termination fees associated with modified advances, net of deferred prepayment fees1,330   4,806   
Total advances$32,480,108   $32,727,668   

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Redemption TermAmountWAIR %AmountWAIR %
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts$$37 3.99 
Due in 1 year or less10,115,576 0.51 11,791,716 1.85 
Due after 1 year through 2 years2,149,839 1.57 2,106,315 2.12 
Due after 2 years through 3 years2,760,624 2.02 2,505,693 2.16 
Due after 3 years through 4 years3,725,103 1.36 2,625,446 2.44 
Due after 4 years through 5 years3,020,039 1.29 4,076,103 2.08 
Thereafter8,919,678 1.05 9,166,357 1.89 
Total advances, par value30,690,859 1.06 32,271,667 1.98 
Fair-value hedging basis adjustments, net645,946  207,111  
Unamortized swap termination fees associated with modified advances, net of deferred prepayment fees10,681  1,330  
Total advances (1)
$31,347,486  $32,480,108  

(1)    Carrying value equals amortized cost, which includes adjustments made to the cost basis for purchase discount or premium and related accretion or amortization, and net charge-offs, and excludes accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2020 and 2019 of $14,961 and $27,019, respectively.

We offer our members certain advances that provide them the right, at predetermined future dates, to call (i.e., prepay) the advance prior to maturity without incurring prepayment or termination fees. Borrowers typically exercise their call options for fixed-rate advances when interest rates decline. We also offer certain adjustable-rate advances that may be contractually prepaid by the borrower at the interest-rate reset date without incurring prepayment or termination fees. All other advances may only be prepaid by paying a fee that is sufficient to make us financially indifferent to the prepayment of the advance. We also offer putable advances. Under the terms of a putable advance, we retain the right to extinguish or put the fixed-rate advance to the member on predetermined future dates and offer replacement funding at current market rates, subject to certain conditions.

The following table presents advances outstanding by the earlier of the redemption date or the next call date and next put date.
Earlier of Redemption
or Next Call Date
Earlier of Redemption
or Next Put Date
December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
December 31,
2019
December 31,
2018
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts$37  $—  $37  $—  
Due in 1 year or less18,497,813  22,574,897  14,560,066  15,595,985  
Due after 1 year through 2 years1,514,015  2,061,411  3,329,315  3,682,461  
Due after 2 years through 3 years2,127,903  1,356,186  3,254,093  3,660,486  
Due after 3 years through 4 years2,117,546  1,581,905  3,025,551  2,547,995  
Due after 4 years through 5 years2,454,103  1,425,525  3,481,353  2,633,030  
Thereafter5,560,250  3,829,437  4,621,252  4,709,404  
Total advances, par value$32,271,667  $32,829,361  $32,271,667  $32,829,361  

Earlier of Redemption
or Next Call Date
Earlier of Redemption
or Next Put Date
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
December 31,
2020
December 31,
2019
Overdrawn demand and overnight deposit accounts$$37 $$37 
Due in 1 year or less15,296,034 18,497,813 14,645,076 14,560,066 
Due after 1 year through 2 years1,797,049 1,514,015 3,107,339 3,329,315 
Due after 2 years through 3 years2,440,024 2,127,903 3,160,729 3,254,093 
Due after 3 years through 4 years2,246,102 2,117,546 3,824,603 3,025,551 
Due after 4 years through 5 years2,076,839 2,454,103 2,585,439 3,481,353 
Thereafter6,834,811 5,560,250 3,367,673 4,621,252 
Total advances, par value$30,690,859 $32,271,667 $30,690,859 $32,271,667 


122
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLBank members prior to September 12, 2014, and dodid not meet the definition of "insurance company" or fall within another category of institution that is eligible for FHLBank membership under the Final Membership Rule, shall havehad their memberships terminated no later thanby February 19, 2021. Prior to termination, new or renewed extensions of credit to such members will be subject to certain restrictions relating to maturity dates andHowever, the ratio of advances to the captive insurer's total assets and may be subject to additional restrictions at our discretion. The outstanding advances to these captive insurers mature ontotaling $288,000 are not required to be repaid prior to their various maturity dates through 2025.2024.

Advance Concentrations. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, our top five borrowers held 44% and 42%, respectively, of total advances outstanding at par.

Allowance for Credit Losses on Advances. We manage our exposure to advances outstanding through an integrated approach that generally includes establishing a credit limit for each borrower, and an ongoing review of each borrower's financial condition, coupled with conservative collateral/lending policies to limit the risk of loss while balancing the borrower's needs for a reliable source of funding. In addition, we lend to eligible borrowers in accordance with federal statutes and Finance Agency regulations. Specifically, we comply with the Bank Act, which requires us to obtain sufficient collateral to fully secure credit products. We evaluate and update our collateral guidelines, as necessary, based on current market conditions.

We accept certain investment securities, residential mortgage loans, deposits, and other real estate-related assets as collateral. In addition, certain members that qualify as CFIs are eligible to utilize expanded statutory collateral provisions for small business and agriculture loans. Under the Bank Act, our members' capital stock in our Bank serves as additional security. Collateral arrangements may vary depending upon borrower credit quality, financial condition and performance; borrowing capacity; and overall credit exposure to the borrower. To ensure that we are sufficiently protected, we evaluate and determine whether a member may retain physical possession of its collateral that is pledged to us or must specifically deliver the collateral to us or our safekeeping agent.

Our evaluation of credit losses on advances utilizes a basic framework that considers the adequacy of the advances' associated collateral and the associated members' willingness and ability to pledge additional collateral to satisfy any current or anticipated future deficiency. Our agreements with borrowers allow us, at any time and in our sole discretion, to require substitution of collateral, adjust the over-collateralization requirements applied to collateral, or refuse to make extensions of credit against any collateral. We also may require borrowers to pledge additional collateral regardless of whether the collateral would be eligible to originate a new extension of credit. Our agreements with our borrowers also afford us the right, in our sole discretion, to declare any borrower to be in default if we deem our Bank to be inadequately secured.

We determine the estimated value of the collateral required to secure each member's advances by applying collateral discounts, or haircuts, to the market value or UPB of the collateral, as applicable. Using a risk-based approach, we consider the amount and quality of the collateral pledged and the borrower's financial condition to be the primary indicators of an advance's credit quality. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, we had rights to collateral on a borrower-by-borrower basis with an estimated lendable value equal to or in excess of our advances outstanding.

At December 31, 2020 and 2019, we did 0t have any advances that were past due, on non-accrual status, or considered impaired. In addition, there were 0 TDRs related to advances during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, or 2018.

Based upon the collateral held as security, our credit extension and collateral policies, our credit analysis and the repayment history on advances, we have not recorded an allowance for credit losses on advances.








110123
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Advance Concentrations. We lend to members according to Federal statutes, including the Bank Act. The Bank Act requires each FHLBank to hold, or have access to, collateral to fully secure its advances. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, our top five borrowers held 42% and 40%, respectively, of total advances outstanding, at par. As security for the advances to these and our other borrowers, we held, or had access to, collateral with an estimated fair value at December 31, 2019 and 2018 that was well in excess of the advances outstanding on those dates, respectively. For information related to our credit risk on advances and allowance methodology for credit losses, see Note 7 - Allowance for Credit Losses.

Note 6 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio

Mortgage loans held for portfolio consist substantially of residential loans acquired from our members through the MPP and participatingMPP. Participating interests were purchased in 2012 - 2014 from the FHLBank of Topeka in residential loans that were originated by certain of its PFIs through their participation in the MPF Program offered by the FHLBank of Chicago. The balances also reflect the sale of a 90% participating interest in a $100 million MCC of certain newly acquired MPP loans to another FHLBank in 2016. The MPP and MPF Program loans are fixed rate and either credit enhanced by PFIs, if conventional, or guaranteed or insured by government agencies.

The following tables present information on mortgage loans held for portfolio by term, type and product.
TermTermDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018TermDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Fixed-rate long-term mortgagesFixed-rate long-term mortgages$9,677,008  $10,145,476  Fixed-rate long-term mortgages$7,257,237 $9,677,008 
Fixed-rate medium-term (1) mortgages
Fixed-rate medium-term (1) mortgages
908,526  992,059  
Fixed-rate medium-term (1) mortgages
1,065,329 908,526 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPBTotal mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB10,585,534  11,137,535  Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB8,322,566 10,585,534 
Unamortized premiumsUnamortized premiums231,807  251,778  Unamortized premiums187,425 231,807 
Unamortized discountsUnamortized discounts(2,158) (2,415) Unamortized discounts(1,638)(2,158)
Fair-value hedging basis adjustments, net154  (1,320) 
Allowance for loan losses(300) (600) 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net$10,815,037  $11,384,978  
Hedging basis adjustments, netHedging basis adjustments, net7,642 154 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolioTotal mortgage loans held for portfolio8,515,995 10,815,337 
Allowance for credit lossesAllowance for credit losses(350)(300)
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net (2)
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, net (2)
$8,515,645 $10,815,037 

(1)    Defined as a term of 15 years or less at origination.
TypeDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Conventional$10,263,249  $10,769,980  
Government-guaranteed or -insured322,285  367,555  
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB$10,585,534  $11,137,535  

(2)    
ProductDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
MPP$10,363,081  $10,875,079  
MPF Program222,453  262,456  
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB$10,585,534  $11,137,535  

For information related to our credit risk on mortgage loansExcludes accrued interest receivable at December 31, 2020 and allowance methodology for loan losses, see2019 of Note 7 - Allowance for Credit Losses$34,151. and $47,722, respectively.

Note 7 - Allowance for Credit Losses
TypeDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Conventional$8,069,274 $10,263,249 
Government-guaranteed or -insured253,292 322,285 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB$8,322,566 $10,585,534 

We have established a methodology to determine the allowance for credit losses for each of our portfolio segments: credit products (advances, letters of credit, and other extensions of credit to members); term securities purchased under agreements to resell and term federal funds sold (including interest-bearing demand deposit accounts); government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans held for portfolio; and conventional mortgage loans held for portfolio.


111
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Credit Products. We manage our exposure to credit products through an integrated approach that generally includes establishing a credit limit for each borrower, and an ongoing review of each borrower's financial condition, coupled with conservative collateral/lending policies to limit the risk of loss while balancing the borrower's needs for a reliable source of funding. In addition, we lend to eligible borrowers in accordance with federal statutes and Finance Agency regulations. Specifically, we comply with the Bank Act, which requires us to obtain sufficient collateral to fully secure credit products. We evaluate and update our collateral guidelines, as necessary, based on current market conditions.

We accept certain investment securities, residential mortgage loans, deposits, and other real estate-related assets as collateral. In addition, certain members that qualify as CFIs are eligible to utilize expanded statutory collateral provisions for small business and agriculture loans. Under the Bank Act, our members' capital stock in our Bank serves as additional security. Collateral arrangements may vary depending upon borrower credit quality, financial condition and performance; borrowing capacity; and overall credit exposure to the borrower. To ensure that we are sufficiently protected, we evaluate and determine whether a member may retain physical possession of its collateral that is pledged to us or must specifically deliver the collateral to us or our safekeeping agent. We perfect our security interest in all pledged collateral and we can also require additional or substitute collateral to protect our security interest.

We determine the estimated value of the collateral required to secure each member's credit products by applying collateral discounts, or haircuts, to the market value or UPB of the collateral, as applicable. Using a risk-based approach, we consider the amount and quality of the collateral pledged and the borrower's financial condition to be the primary indicators of credit quality on the borrower's credit products. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we had rights to collateral on a borrower-by-borrower basis with an estimated value equal to or in excess of our outstanding extensions of credit.

At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we did not have any credit products that were past due, on non-accrual status, or considered impaired. In addition, there were no TDRs related to credit products during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, or 2017.

Based upon the collateral held as security, our credit extension and collateral policies, our credit analysis and the repayment history on credit products, we have not recorded any allowance for credit losses on credit products, and no liability was recorded to reflect an allowance for credit losses for off-balance sheet credit exposures. For additional information about off-balance sheet credit exposure, see Note 18 - Commitments and Contingencies.

Interest-Bearing Deposits, Term Securities Purchased Under Agreements to Resell and Term Federal Funds Sold. Except for interest-bearing deposits, which may be redeemed at any time during business hours, these assets generally have maturities ranging from 1 to 270 days. Given their short-term nature and the credit quality of the counterparties, credit risk is minimal and, as such, we have not established an allowance for credit losses for these products.

Government-Guaranteed or -Insured MortgageLoans. We invest in fixed-rate mortgage loans that are guaranteed or insured by the FHA, Department of Veterans Affairs, Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture, or HUD. The servicer provides and maintains a guaranty or insurance from the applicable government agency. The servicer is responsible for compliance with all government agency requirements and for obtaining the benefit of the applicable guaranty or insurance with respect to defaulted government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans. Any losses incurred on these loans that are not recovered from the insurer or guarantor are absorbed by the servicers. Therefore, we did not establish an allowance for credit losses for government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans at December 31, 2019 or 2018.

Conventional Mortgage Loans. We invest in conventional mortgage loans primarily through the MPP. Additionally, we hold participating interests in conventional mortgage loans that were originated by PFIs of the FHLBank of Topeka through the MPF Program.
ProductDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
MPP$8,163,902 $10,363,081 
MPF Program158,664 222,453 
Total mortgage loans held for portfolio, UPB$8,322,566 $10,585,534 

Conventional MPP. Our management of credit risk considers the several layers of loss protection that are defined in our agreements with the PFIs. Our loss protection consists of the following loss layers, in order of priority, (i) borrower equity; (ii) PMI up to coverage limits (when applicable for the acquisition of mortgages with an initial LTV ratio of over 80% at the time of purchase); (iii) available funds remaining in the LRA; and (iv) SMI coverage (as applicable) purchased by the seller from a third-party provider naming the Bank as the beneficiary, up to the policy limits. Any losses not absorbed by the loss protection are borne by the Bank.

112
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

For conventional mortgage loans under our original MPP, credit enhancement is provided through allocating a portion of the periodic interest payments on the loans into an LRA. In addition, the PFI selling conventional loans to us is required to purchase SMI, paid through periodic interest payments, as an enhancement to cover credit losses over and above those covered by the LRA, but the covered losses are limited to the terms of the policy.

Beginning with Advantage MPP, we discontinued the use of SMI for all loan purchases and replaced it with a fixed LRA. The fixed LRA is funded with a portion of each loan's purchase proceeds.


124
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The LRA is segregated by pools of loans and used to cover losses in a pool beyond those covered by an individual loan's PMI (as applicable), but is limited to covering losses of that specific pool only. Any excess funds are ultimately distributed to the member in accordance with a step-down schedule that is established upon execution of an MCC, subject to performance of the related pool.

The following table presents the activity in the LRA, which is reported in other liabilities.
LRA Activity201920182017
Liability, beginning of year$174,096  $148,715  $125,683  
Additions15,435  26,662  25,350  
Claims paid(302) (508) (617) 
Distributions to PFIs(2,644) (773) (1,701) 
Liability, end of year$186,585  $174,096  $148,715  

We determine our allowance for loan losses based on our best estimate of probable losses over the loss emergence period. We use the MPP portfolio's delinquency migration (movement of loans through the various stages of delinquency) to determine whether a loss event is probable. Once a loss event is deemed to be probable, we utilize a systematic methodology that incorporates all credit enhancements and servicer advances to establish the allowance for loan losses. Although we do not reserve for any estimated losses that would be recovered from the credit enhancements, as part of the estimate of the recoverable credit enhancements, we evaluate the recovery and collectability of amounts under our PMI/SMI policies.
LRA Activity202020192018
Liability, beginning of year$186,585 $174,096 $148,715 
Additions24,298 15,435 26,662 
Claims paid(329)(302)(508)
Distributions to PFIs(3,249)(2,644)(773)
Liability, end of year$207,305 $186,585 $174,096 

Conventional MPF Program. Our management of credit risk in the MPF Program considers the several layers of loss protection that are defined in agreements among the FHLBank of Topeka and its PFIs. The availability of loss protection may differ slightly among MPF products. The loss layers, in order of priority, are (i) borrower equity; (ii) PMI up to coverage limits (when applicable for the purchase of mortgages with an initial LTV ratio of over 80% at the time of purchase); (iii) FLA, which represents the first layer or portion of credit losses that we absorb after the borrower's equity, PMI, and any recoverable CE fees; and (iv) the CE Obligation of a PFI, which absorbs losses in excess of the FLA in order to limit our loss exposure to that of an investor in an MBS deemed to be investment-grade. Any losses not absorbed by the loss protection are shared among the participating FHLBanks based upon the applicable percentage of participation.

PFIs retain a portion of the credit risk on the loans they sell by providing credit enhancement through a direct liability to pay credit losses up to a specified amount. PFIs are paid a CE fee for assuming credit risk and, in some instances, all or a portion of the CE fee may be performance-based. To the extent the Bank is responsible for losses in a pool, it may be able to recapture CE fees paid to that PFI to offset those losses. All CE fees are paid monthly based on the remaining UPB of the loans in a pool.

Government-Guaranteed or -Insured MortgageLoans.These fixed-rate mortgage loans are guaranteed or insured by the FHA, Department of Veterans Affairs, Rural Housing Service of the Department of Agriculture, or HUD. The allowance for MPF Program conventional loans is determined by analyzing the portfolio's delinquency migrationservicer provides and charge-offs overmaintains a historical period to determine the probability of default and loss severity rates. The analysis of conventional loans evaluated for impairment (i) considers loan pool-specific attribute data; (ii) applies estimated default probabilities and loss severities; and (iii) incorporatesguaranty or insurance from the applicable credit enhancements in ordergovernment agency. The servicer is responsible for compliance with all government agency requirements and for obtaining the benefit of the applicable guaranty or insurance with respect to determine our best estimate of probable losses.defaulted government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans. Any losses incurred on these loans that are not recovered from the insurer or guarantor are absorbed by the servicers.

Credit Quality Indicators for Conventional Mortgage Loans and Other Delinquency Statistics. Payment status is the key credit quality indicator for conventional mortgage loans and allows us to monitor the migration of past due loans. Past due loans are those where the borrower has failed to make timely payments of principal and/or interest in accordance with the terms of the loan. Other delinquency statistics include non-accrual loans and loans in process of foreclosure. The tables below present the key credit quality indicators for our mortgage loans held for portfolio.

Origination Year
Payment Status as of December 31, 2020Prior to 20162016 to 2020Total
Past due:
30-59 days$19,893 $22,130 $42,023 
60-89 days6,980 12,078 19,058 
90 days or more27,467 67,075 94,542 
Total past due54,340 101,283 155,623 
Total current2,468,908 5,635,070 8,103,978 
Total conventional mortgage loans, amortized cost (1)
$2,523,248 $5,736,353 $8,259,601 

113125
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans.We have continued to apply our existing accounting policies for past due, non-accrual, and charge-offs for COVID-19-related loan modifications considered to be informal, i.e. the legal terms of the loan were not changed. Based on the most recent information received from our mortgage servicers, as of December 31, 2020, the UPB of conventional loans in an informal forbearance arrangement totaled $111,516, or 1.4% of our total conventional loans outstanding. The payment status as of December 31, 2020 includes such loans 30 to 59 days past due of $10,214, 60-89 days past due of $12,661, and 90 days or more past due of $79,011, for total past due of $101,886. Such loans with a current payment status totaled $9,630.

MPP.As of December 31, 2020, no formal or informal COVID-19-related loan modifications were classified as TDRs. For more information, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

Payment Status as of December 31, 2019Total
Past due:
30-59 days$44,479 
60-89 days9,868 
90 days or more10,668 
Total past due65,015 
Total current10,470,495 
Total conventional mortgage loans, recorded investment (1)(2)
$10,535,510 

Other Delinquency Statistics as of December 31, 2020ConventionalGovernmentTotal
In process of foreclosure (3)
$2,689 $$2,689 
Serious delinquency rate (1)(4)
1.14 %3.36 %1.21 %
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (1)(5)
$36,585 $7,933 $44,518 
On non-accrual status (6)
$87,763 $$87,763 

Other Delinquency Statistics as of December 31, 2019
In process of foreclosure (3)
$2,071 $$2,071 
Serious delinquency rate (1)(4)
0.10 %0.94 %0.13 %
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (1)(5)
$10,127 $3,069 $13,196 
On non-accrual status$1,063 $$1,063 

(1)    Based on the amortized cost at December 31, 2020, which excludes accrued interest receivable. Based on the recorded investment at December 31, 2019, which includes accrued interest receivable.
(2)    The recorded investment in a loan is the UPB of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net of any unamortized premiums or discounts (which may include the basis adjustment related to any gain or loss on a delivery commitment prior to being funded) and direct charge-offs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.
(3)    Includes loans for which the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative, such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due categories depending on their delinquency status, but are not necessarily considered to be on non-accrual status.
(4)    Represents loans 90 days or more past due (including loans in process of foreclosure) expressed as a percentage of the total mortgage loans. The percentage excludes principal and interest amounts previously paid in full by the servicers on conventional loans that are pending resolution of potential loss claims. Our servicers repurchase seriously delinquent government loans, including FHA loans, when certain criteria are met.
(5)    Although our past due scheduled/scheduled MPP loans are classified as loans past due 90 days or more based on the loan's delinquency status, we do not consider these loans to be on non-accrual status.
(6)    As of December 31, 2020, $87,708 of UPB of these conventional mortgage loans on non-accrual status did not have a specifically assigned allowance for credit losses and $59,306 of UPB of these conventional mortgage loans were in informal forbearance related to the COVID-19 pandemic.


126
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Allowance for Credit Losses.

Collectively Evaluated Mortgage Loans.Conventional loans current to 179 days past due are collectively evaluated for impairment at the pool level using a recognized third-party credit and prepayment model, which considers both current and historical information and events and reasonable and supportable forecasts that rely upon certain key inputs and assumptions, to estimate potential ranges of credit loss exposure. The loss projectionexposure over the estimated life of the loans. One such key input is a 3-year forecast of housing prices before full reversion to historical inputs over 5 years. Additionally, the evaluation is based upon distinct underlying loan characteristics, including loan vintage (year of origination), geographic location, credit support features and other factors, and a projected migration of loans through the various stages of delinquency.

Seriously delinquent conventional loans past due 180 days or more past due and not charged-off are also collectively evaluated for impairment at the pool level based on current and historical information and events and are charged-off in accordance withloan-specific attribution data, including the use of loan-level property values from a third-party.

Prior to January 1, 2020, our policy.allowance was based on our best estimate of probable losses over a loss emergence period of 24 months.

MPF Program. Our loan loss analysis includes collectively evaluating conventional loans for impairment within each pool. The measurement of the allowance for loan losses consists of (i) evaluating homogeneous pools of current and delinquent mortgage loans; and (ii) estimating credit losses in the pool based upon the default probability ratios, loss severity rates, FLAs and CE obligations. Additional analyses include consideration of various data observations such as past performance, current performance, loan portfolio characteristics, collateral-related characteristics, industry data and prevailing economic conditions.

Individually Evaluated Mortgage Loans.

Certain conventional mortgage loans, that are impaired, primarily TDRs, are specifically identified for purposes of calculating the allowance for loancredit losses. The measurement of our allowance for individually evaluated loans considers loan-specific attribution data similar to homogeneous pools of delinquent loans evaluated on a collective basis, including the use of loan-level property values from a third-party.

We also individually evaluate any remaining exposure to delinquent MPP conventional loans paid in full by the servicers. An estimate of the loss, if any, is equal to the estimated cost associated with maintaining and disposing of the property (which includes the UPB, interest owed on the delinquent loan to date, and estimated costs associated with disposing of the collateral) less the estimated fair value of the collateral (net of estimated selling costs) and the amount of credit enhancements including the PMI, LRA and SMI. The estimated fair value of the collateral is obtained from HUD statements, sales listings or other evidence of current expected liquidation amounts.

Interest income recognizedQualitative Factors.We also assess qualitative factors in our estimation of credit losses. These factors represent a subjective management judgment based on impaired MPP conventional loans wasfacts and circumstances that exist as of the reporting date that are not material for the periods presented.ascribed to any specific measurable economic or credit event and therefore may not otherwise be captured in our methodology.






114
127
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Credit Quality IndicatorComponents and Other Delinquency Statistics. The tables below present the key credit quality indicators for our mortgage loans held for portfolio.
Delinquency Status as of December 31, 2019ConventionalGovernmentTotal
Past due:
30-59 days$44,479  $7,652  $52,131  
60-89 days9,868  2,189  12,057  
90 days or more10,668  3,069  13,737  
Total past due65,015  12,910  77,925  
Total current10,470,495  314,638  10,785,133  
Total mortgage loans, recorded investment (1)
$10,535,510  $327,548  $10,863,058  

Delinquency Status as of December 31, 2018
Past due:
30-59 days$36,594  $9,352  $45,946  
60-89 days7,904  2,870  10,774  
90 days or more13,764  1,697  15,461  
Total past due58,262  13,919  72,181  
Total current11,003,243  359,758  11,363,001  
Total mortgage loans, recorded investment (1)
$11,061,505  $373,677  $11,435,182  

Other Delinquency Statistics as of December 31, 2019ConventionalGovernmentTotal
In process of foreclosure (2)
$2,071  $—  $2,071  
Serious delinquency rate (3)
0.10 %0.94 %0.13 %
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (4)
$10,127  $3,069  $13,196  
On non-accrual status$1,063  $—  $1,063  

Other Delinquency Statistics as of December 31, 2018
In process of foreclosure (2)
$6,836  $—  $6,836  
Serious delinquency rate (3)
0.12 %0.45 %0.14 %
Past due 90 days or more still accruing interest (4)
$12,849  $1,697  $14,546  
On non-accrual status$1,762  $—  $1,762  

(1) The recorded investment in a loan is the UPBRollforward of the loan, adjusted for accrued interest, net of any unamortized premiums or discounts (which may include the basis adjustment related to any gain or loss on a delivery commitment prior to being funded) and direct charge-offs. The recorded investment is not net of any valuation allowance.
(2) Includes loans for which the decision of foreclosure or similar alternative, such as pursuit of deed-in-lieu of foreclosure, has been reported. Loans in process of foreclosure are included in past due categories depending on their delinquency status, but are not necessarily considered to be on non-accrual status.
(3) Represents loans 90 days or more past due (including loans in process of foreclosure) expressed as a percentage of the total recorded investment in mortgage loans. The percentage excludes principal and interest amounts previously paid in full by the servicers on conventional loans that are pending resolution of potential loss claims. Our servicers repurchase seriously delinquent government loans, including FHA loans, when certain criteria are met.
(4) Although our past due scheduled/scheduled MPP loans are classified as loans past due 90 days or more based on the loan's delinquency status, we do not consider these loans to be on non-accrual status.

Qualitative Factors.We also assess qualitative factors in the estimation of loan losses. These factors represent a subjective management judgment based on facts and circumstances that exist as of the reporting date that is not ascribed to any specific measurable economic or credit event and is intended to address other inherent losses that may not otherwise be captured in our methodology.

115
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Allowance for Loan Losses on Mortgage Loans.Credit Losses. Our loan loss analysis also compares, or benchmarks, our estimated losses, after credit enhancements, to actual losses occurring in the portfolio. As a result of our methodology, our allowance for loan losses reflects our best estimate of the probable losses in our original MPP, Advantage MPP, and MPF Program portfolios.

The following table presents the components of the allowance for loancredit losses, including the credit enhancement waterfall for MPP.
Components of Allowance for Loan LossesDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
MPP estimated incurred losses remaining after borrower's equity, before credit enhancements (1)
$4,410  $3,505  
Portion of estimated incurred losses recoverable from credit enhancements:
PMI(667) (627) 
LRA (2)
(2,581) (1,137) 
SMI(927) (1,256) 
Total portion recoverable from credit enhancements(4,175) (3,020) 
Allowance for unrecoverable PMI/SMI15  15  
Allowance for MPP loan losses250  500  
Allowance for MPF Program loan losses50  100  
Allowance for loan losses$300  $600  

(1) 
Components of AllowanceDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
MPP expected losses remaining after borrower's equity, before credit enhancements$10,305 $4,410 
Portion of expected losses recoverable from credit enhancements:
PMI(2,277)(667)
LRA (1)
(6,847)(2,581)
SMI(963)(927)
Total portion recoverable from credit enhancements(10,087)(4,175)
Allowance for unrecoverable PMI/SMI32 15 
Allowance for MPP credit losses250 250 
Allowance for MPF Program credit losses100 50 
Allowance for credit losses$350 $300 
Based on a loss emergence period of 24 months.
(2) (1)    Amounts recoverable are limited to (i) the estimatedexpected losses remaining after borrower's equity and PMI and (ii) the remaining balance in each pool's portion of the LRA. The remainder of the total LRA balance is available to cover any losses not yet incurredexpected and to distribute any excess funds to the PFIs.

The tablestable below presentpresents a rollforward of our allowance for loan losses, the allowance for loan losses by impairment methodology, and the recorded investment in mortgage loans by impairment methodology.
Rollforward of Allowance for Loan Losses201920182017
Balance, beginning of year$600  $850  $850  
Charge-offs(137) (444) (647) 
Recoveries126  425  596  
Provision for (reversal of) loan losses(289) (231) 51  
Balance, end of year$300  $600  $850  
credit losses.

Allowance for Loan Losses by Impairment MethodologyDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment$265  $563  
Conventional loans individually evaluated for impairment (1)
35  37  
Total allowance for loan losses$300  $600  
Recorded Investment by Impairment MethodologyDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Conventional loans collectively evaluated for impairment$10,522,243  $11,048,075  
Conventional loans individually evaluated for impairment (1)
13,267  13,430  
Total recorded investment in conventional loans$10,535,510  $11,061,505  
Rollforward of Allowance202020192018
Balance, beginning of year$300 $600 $850 
Charge-offs(140)(137)(444)
Recoveries50 126 425 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses140 (289)(231)
Balance, end of year$350 $300 $600 

(1) The recorded investment inGovernment-Guaranteed or -Insured Mortgage Loans. Based on the U.S. government guarantee or insurance on these loans, our MPP conventionalassessment of our servicers, and the collateral backing the loans, individually evaluatedwe did 0t establish an allowance for impairment excludes principal previously paid in full by the servicers as ofcredit losses for government-guaranteed or -insured mortgage loans at December 31, 20192020 or 2019. Furthermore, NaN of these mortgage loans have been placed on non-accrual status due to the U.S. government guarantee or insurance on these loans and 2018 of $1,318 and $1,552, respectively, that remains subject to potential claims by those servicers for any losses resulting from past or future liquidationsthe contractual obligation of the underlying properties. However,loan servicer to repurchase the MPP allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 includes $5 and $16, respectively, for these potential claims.loans when certain criteria are met.


116128
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 87 - Premises, Software and Equipment

The following table presents the types of our premises, software and equipment.
TypeDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Premises$15,828  $15,059  
Computer software45,049  43,186  
Data processing equipment4,975  5,054  
Furniture and equipment6,294  5,237  
Other703  724  
Premises, software and equipment, in service72,849  69,260  
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(41,133) (34,789) 
Premises, software and equipment, in service, net31,716  34,471  
Capitalized assets in progress4,833  2,727  
Premises, software and equipment, net$36,549  $37,198  

TypeDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Premises$15,769 $15,828 
Computer software48,952 45,049 
Data processing equipment6,048 4,975 
Furniture and equipment6,365 6,294 
Other756 703 
Premises, software and equipment, in service77,890 72,849 
Accumulated depreciation and amortization(46,681)(41,133)
Premises, software and equipment, in service, net31,209 31,716 
Capitalized assets in progress2,784 4,833 
Premises, software and equipment, net$33,993 $36,549 

The depreciation and amortization expense for premises, software and equipment for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018 was $7,198, $6,879, $6,230, and $5,965,$6,230, respectively, including amortization of computer software costs of $4,983,$5,315, $4,983, and $4,237, and $4,276, respectively.

Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities

Nature of Business Activity. We are exposed to interest-rate risk primarily from the effect of changes in market interest rates on our interest-earning assets and our interest-bearing liabilities that finance those assets. The goal of our interest-rate risk management strategies is not to eliminate interest-rate risk, but to manage it within appropriate limits. To mitigate the risk of loss, we have established policies and procedures, which include guidelines on the amount of exposure to interest rate changes that we are willing to accept. In addition, we monitor the risk to our interest income, net interest margin and average maturity of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.

Consistent with Finance Agency regulation, we enter into derivatives to (i) manage the interest-rate risk exposures inherent in our otherwise unhedged assets and funding positions, (ii) achieve our risk management objectives, and (iii) act as an intermediary between our members and counterparties. Finance Agency regulation and our Enterprise Risk Management Policyrisk management policies prohibit trading in, or the speculative use of, these derivative instruments and limit credit risk arising from these instruments. However, the use of derivatives is an integral part of our financial management strategy.

We use derivative financial instruments when they are considered to be the most cost-effective alternative to achieve our financial and risk management objectives. The most common ways in which we use derivatives are to:

reduce the interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps of assets and liabilities;
protect the value of existing asset and liability positions or of commitments and forecasted transactions;
mitigate the adverse earnings effects of the shortening or extension of the duration of certain assets (e.g., advances or mortgage assets) and liabilities;
reduce funding costs by executing a derivative concurrently with the issuance of a consolidated obligation as the cost of a combined funding structure can be lower than the cost of a comparable CO bond;
reduce the interest-rate sensitivity and repricing gaps of assets and liabilities;
preserve a favorable interest-rate spread between the yield of an asset (e.g., an advance) and the cost of the related liability (e.g., CO bond used to fund advance);
mitigate the adverse earnings effects of the shortening or extension of the duration of certain assets (e.g., advances or mortgage assets) and liabilities;
protect the value of existing asset and liability positions or of commitments and forecasted transactions;
manage embedded options in assets and liabilities; and
manage our overall asset/liability structure.

We reevaluate our hedging strategies from time to time and, consequently, we may adopt new strategies or change our hedging techniques.

117129
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

We transact most of our derivatives with large banks and major broker-dealers. Some of these banks and broker-dealers or their affiliates buy, sell, and distribute consolidated obligations. We are not a derivatives dealer and thus do not trade derivatives for short-term profit. Over-the-counter derivative transactions may be either executed with a counterparty (uncleared derivatives) or cleared through a Futures Commission Merchant (i.e., clearing agent) with a clearinghouse (cleared derivatives). Once a derivative transaction has been accepted for clearing by a clearinghouse, the derivative transaction is novated, and the executing counterparty is replaced with the clearinghouse.

Types of Derivatives. We use the following derivative instruments to reduce funding costs and to manage our exposure to interest-rate risks inherent in the normal course of business.

Interest-Rate Swaps. An interest-rate swap is an agreement between two entities to exchange cash flows in the future. The agreement sets forth the manner in which the cash flows will be determined and the dates on which they will be paid. One of the simplest forms of an interest-rate swap involves the promise by one party to pay cash flows equivalent to the interest on a notional amount at a predetermined fixed rate for a given period of time. In return for this promise, the party receives cash flows equivalent to the interest on the same notional amount at a variable-rate index for the same period of time. The variable rate we receive or pay in most interest-rate swaps is currently indexed to LIBOR.LIBOR, EFFR, or SOFR.

Interest-Rate Cap and Floor Agreements. In an interest-rate cap agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or rate of an underlying variable rises above a certain threshold (or "cap") price. In an interest-rate floor agreement, a cash flow is generated if the price or rate of an underlying variable falls below a certain threshold (or "floor") price. Caps may be used in conjunction with liabilities, and floors may be used in conjunction with assets. Caps and floors are designedused to protect against the interest rate on a variable-rate asset or liability falling below or rising above a certain level.

Interest-Rate Swaptions. A swaption is an option on a swap that gives the buyer the right, but not the obligation, to enter into a specified interest-rate swap with the following agreed upon terms with the seller: option premium, time until expiration, fixed vs. floating rates, and notional amount. When used as a hedge, a swaption can protect the buyer against sudden adverse moves in interest rates. To protect against the adverse effects of a sudden decreaseincreases or decreases in interest rates, awe utilize payer or receiver swaption may be utilized in which the buyer has the option to enter into a swap to receive the fixed rate and pay the floating rate. To protect against the adverse effects of a sudden increase in interest rates, a payer swaption may be utilized in which the buyer has the option to enter into a swap to pay the fixed rate and receive the floating rate.swaptions, respectively.

Forward Contracts. Forward contracts give the buyer the right to buy or sell a specific type of asset at a specific time at a given price. For example, certainCertain MDCs entered into by us are considered derivatives. We may hedge these MDCs by selling TBAs for forward settlement.

Types of Hedged Items. We document at inception all relationships between the derivatives designated as hedging instruments and the hedged items, our risk management objectives and strategies for undertaking various hedge transactions, and our method of assessing effectiveness. For derivatives in shortcut hedge accounting relationships, we can assume the change in the fair value of the derivative is perfectly effective in offsetting the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk without performing a formal effectiveness assessment at the hedge's inception or on an on-going basis. For derivatives in long-haul hedge accounting relationships, we formally assess (both at the hedge's inception and at least quarterly), using regression analyses, whether the derivatives have been highly effective in offsetting changes in the fair value of the hedged items attributable to the hedged risk and whether those derivatives may be expected to remain highly effective in future periods. We have the following types of hedged items:

Investments. We primarily invest in MBS, U.S. Treasury securities, and GSE and TVA debentures, which may be classified as trading, HTM or AFS securities. The interest-rate, prepayment and duration risks associated with these investment securities are managed through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. We may manage those risks by funding investment securities with consolidated obligations that contain call features. We may also hedge the prepayment risk with caps or floors, callable swaps or swaptions. We may manage the risk and volatility arising from changing market prices of investment securities by matching the cash outflow on the derivatives with the cash inflow on the investment securities. Derivatives mayCertain of these derivatives qualify as either fair-value hedges or bewhile others are designated as economic hedges.

118130
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Advances. We offer a wide range of fixed- and variable-rate advance products with different maturities, interest rates, payment characteristics, and optionality. We may use derivatives to manage the repricing and/or options characteristics of advances in order to more closely match the characteristics of our funding liabilities. In general, whenever a member executes a fixed-rate advance or an adjustable-rate advance with embedded options, we may simultaneously execute a derivative with terms that offset the terms and embedded options in the advance. For example, we may hedge a fixed-rate advance with an interest-rate swap where we pay a fixed-rate and receive a variable-rate, effectively converting the fixed-rate advance to an adjustable-rate advance. This type of hedge is typically treated as a fair-value hedge. In addition, we may hedge a callable, prepayable or putable advance by entering into a cancellable interest-rate swap.

Mortgage Loans. We invest in fixed-rate mortgage loans. The prepayment options embedded in these mortgage loans can result in extensions or contractions in the expected repayment of these loans, depending on changes in prepayment speeds. We manage the interest-rate and prepayment risks associated with mortgage loans through a combination of debt issuance and derivatives. We issue both callable and noncallable consolidated obligations to achieve cash flow patterns and liability durations similar to those expected on the mortgage loans. Interest-rate swaps, to the extent the payments on the mortgages loans result in a simultaneous reduction of the notional amount of the swaps, may qualify for fair-value hedge accounting.

We may also purchase interest-rate caps and floors, swaptions, callable swaps, calls, and puts to minimize the prepayment risk embedded in the loans. Although these derivatives are valideffective economic hedges against the prepayment risk of the loans, they are not specifically linked to individual loans and, therefore, do not qualify for fair-value hedge accounting. These derivatives are marked to fair value through earnings.

Consolidated Obligations. We may enter into derivatives to hedge the interest-rate risk associated with our debt issuances. We manage the risk and volatility arising from changing market prices of a consolidated obligation by matching the cash inflow on the derivative with the cash outflow on the consolidated obligation.

In a typical transaction, we issue a fixed-rate consolidated obligation and simultaneously enter into a matching derivative in which the counterparty pays fixed cash flows to us designed to match in timing and amount the cash outflows we pay on the consolidated obligation. In turn, we pay a variable cash flow to the counterparty that closely matches the interest payments we receive on short-term or variable-rate advances (typically one- or three-month LIBOR)LIBOR or EFFR). These transactions are typically treated as fair-value hedges. Additionally, we may issue variable-rate CO bonds indexed to LIBOR, SOFR, or the United States prime rate, or federal funds rate and simultaneously execute interest-rate swaps to hedge the basis risk of the variable-rate debt.

Firm Commitments. Certain MDCs are considered derivatives. We normally hedge these commitments by selling TBA MBS or other derivatives for forward settlement. The MDC and the TBA used in the firm commitment hedging strategy are treated as an economic hedge and are marked to fair value through earnings. When the MDC settles, the current fair value of the commitment is included with the basis of the mortgage loan and amortized accordingly.

Managing Credit Risk on Derivatives. We are also subject to credit risk due to the risk of nonperformance by the counterparties to our derivative transactions. We manage counterparty credit risk through credit analysis, collateral requirements and adherence to the requirements set forth in our policies, CFTC regulations, and Finance Agency regulations. For discussion regarding our fair value methodology for derivative assets and liabilities, including an evaluation of the potential for the estimated fair value of these instruments to be affected by counterparty credit risk, see Note 17 - Estimated Fair Values.

Uncleared Derivatives. For uncleared derivatives, the degree of credit risk depends on the extent to which master netting
arrangements are included in such contracts to mitigate the risk. We require collateral agreements with our uncleared
derivatives. The exposure thresholds above which collateral must be delivered vary; the threshold is zero in some cases.
Additionally, collateral related to derivatives with member institutions includes collateral assigned to us as evidenced by a
written security agreement and held by the member institution for our benefit.

119
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

For certain of our uncleared derivatives, we have credit support agreements that contain provisions requiring us to post additional collateral with our counterparties if there is deterioration in our credit rating. If our credit rating is lowered by an NRSRO, we could be required to deliver additional collateral on uncleared derivative instruments in net liability positions. The aggregate estimated fair value of all uncleared derivative instruments with credit-risk-related contingent features that were in a net liability position (before cash collateral and related accrued interest on cash collateral) at December 31, 20192020 was $1,196,$1,177, for which we have posted collateral in cash, including accrued interest, of $995$894 in the normal course of business. If our credit rating had been lowered by an NRSRO (from an S&P equivalent of AA+ to AA), we would not have been required to deliver additional collateral to our uncleared derivative counterparties at December 31, 2019.2020.

131
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Cleared Derivatives. For cleared derivatives, the clearinghouse is our counterparty. We use LCH and CME as clearinghouses for all cleared derivative transactions. Collateral is required to be posted daily for changes in the value of cleared derivatives to mitigate each counterparty's credit risk. The clearinghouse notifies the clearing agent of the required initial and variation margin, and the clearing agent notifies us. The requirement that we post initial and variation margin through the clearing agent for the benefit of the clearinghouse exposes us to institutional credit risk in the event that the clearing agent or clearinghouse fails to meet its obligations.

At both clearinghouses, initial margin is considered cash collateral and variation margin is characterized as daily settlement payments.

The clearinghouse determines margin requirements which are generally not based on credit ratings. However, clearing agents may require additional margin to be posted by us based on credit considerations, including but not limited to any credit rating downgrades. At December 31, 2019,2020, we were not required by our clearing agents to post any additional margin.

120
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Financial Statement Effect and Additional Financial Information.

The notional amount of derivatives serves as a factor in determining periodic interest payments, or cash flows received and paid. The notional amount of derivatives also reflects the extent of our involvement in the various classes of financial instruments but represents neither the actual amounts exchanged nor our overall exposure to credit and market risk; the overall risk is much smaller. The risks of derivatives can be measured meaningfully on a portfolio basis that takes into account the counterparties, the types of derivatives, the items being hedged and any offsets between the derivatives and the items being hedged. We record derivative instruments, related cash collateral received or pledged/posted and associated accrued interest on a net basis, by clearing agent and/or by counterparty when the netting requirements have been met.


132
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents the notional amount and estimated fair value of derivative assets and liabilities.
 Estimated Fair ValueEstimated Fair Value
 Notionalof Derivativeof Derivative
December 31, 2019AmountAssetsLiabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps$41,108,749  $60,155  $318,815  
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments41,108,749  60,155  318,815  
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:         
Interest-rate swaps7,634,000  450  27  
Swaptions850,000  16  —  
Interest-rate caps/floors668,500  215  —  
Interest-rate forwards70,200  —  216  
MDCs70,693  105   
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments9,293,393  786  246  
Total derivatives before adjustments$50,402,142  60,941  319,061  
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
 147,067  (315,855) 
Total derivatives, net $208,008  $3,206  
December 31, 2018
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps$35,135,617  $174,990  $123,331  
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments35,135,617  174,990  123,331  
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:   
Interest-rate swaps965,930  562  106  
Swaptions950,000  105  —  
Interest-rate caps/floors679,500  999  —  
Interest-rate forwards44,100  —  202  
MDCs43,753  146  23  
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments2,683,283  1,812  331  
Total derivatives before adjustments$37,818,900  176,802  123,662  
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
 (60,038) (102,595) 
Total derivatives, net $116,764  $21,067  

 Estimated Fair Value
 NotionalDerivativeDerivative
December 31, 2020AmountAssetsLiabilities
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps$40,227,966 $13,018 $761,330 
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments40,227,966 13,018 761,330 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:   
Economic hedges:
Interest-rate swaps9,177,000 5,404 181 
Swaptions
Interest-rate caps/floors625,500 1,113 
Interest-rate forwards180,900 1,486 
MDCs180,152 1,022 
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments10,163,552 7,539 1,667 
Total derivatives before adjustments$50,391,518 20,557 762,997 
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
 262,525 (740,018)
Total derivatives, net $283,082 $22,979 
December 31, 2019
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments:
Interest-rate swaps$41,108,749 $60,155 $318,815 
Total derivatives designated as hedging instruments41,108,749 60,155 318,815 
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:   
Economic hedges:
Interest-rate swaps7,634,000 450 27 
Swaptions850,000 16 
Interest-rate caps/floors668,500 215 
Interest-rate forwards70,200 216 
MDCs70,693 105 
Total derivatives not designated as hedging instruments9,293,393 786 246 
Total derivatives before adjustments$50,402,142 60,941 319,061 
Netting adjustments and cash collateral (1)
 147,067 (315,855)
Total derivatives, net $208,008 $3,206 

(1)    Represents the application of the netting requirements that allow us to settle (i) positive and negative positions and (ii) cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed, with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty. Cash collateral pledged to counterparties at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, including accrued interest, totaled $464,187$1,003,437 and $127,952,$464,187, respectively. Cash collateral received from counterparties and held at December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, including accrued interest, totaled $1,265$894 and $85,395,$1,265, respectively. At December 31, 2020 and 2019, and 2018, no0 securities were pledged as collateral.

121133
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents separately the estimated fair value of derivative instruments meeting and not meeting netting requirements, including the effect of the related collateral.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Derivative AssetsDerivative LiabilitiesDerivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Derivative instruments meeting netting requirements:
Gross recognized amount
Uncleared$51,955  $318,023  $174,725  $106,333  
Cleared8,881  819  1,931  17,104  
Total gross recognized amount60,836  318,842  176,656  123,437  
Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral
Uncleared(36,954) (315,036) (168,426) (85,491) 
Cleared184,021  (819) 108,388  (17,104) 
Total gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral147,067  (315,855) (60,038) (102,595) 
Net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral
Uncleared15,001  2,987  6,299  20,842  
Cleared192,902  —  110,319  —  
Total net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral207,903  2,987  116,618  20,842  
Derivative instruments not meeting netting requirements (1)
105  219  146  225  
Total derivatives, at estimated fair value$208,008  $3,206  $116,764  $21,067  

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Derivative AssetsDerivative LiabilitiesDerivative AssetsDerivative Liabilities
Derivative instruments meeting netting requirements:
Gross recognized amount
Uncleared$13,793 $755,118 $51,955 $318,023 
Cleared5,742 6,393 8,881 819 
Total gross recognized amount19,535 761,511 60,836 318,842 
Gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral
Uncleared(13,793)(733,625)(36,954)(315,036)
Cleared276,318 (6,393)184,021 (819)
Total gross amounts of netting adjustments and cash collateral262,525 (740,018)147,067 (315,855)
Net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral
Uncleared21,493 15,001 2,987 
Cleared282,060 192,902 
Total net amounts after netting adjustments and cash collateral282,060 21,493 207,903 2,987 
Derivative instruments not meeting netting requirements (1)
1,022 1,486 105 219 
Total derivatives, at estimated fair value$283,082 $22,979 $208,008 $3,206 

(1)    Includes MDCs and certain interest-rate forwards.

The following table presents the components of net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities reported in other income.
Years Ended December 31,
Type of Hedge201920182017
Net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness:
Interest-rate swaps$—  $(5,323) $(7,414) 
Total net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness—  (5,323) (7,414) 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest-rate swaps(6,950) 7,071  122  
Swaptions(1,308) (892) (200) 
Interest-rate caps/floors(784) (60) (228) 
Interest-rate forwards(1,647) 1,460  (1,728) 
Net interest settlements(9,856) (7,834) (416) 
MDCs1,562  (2,390) 835  
Total net gains (losses) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(18,983) (2,645) (1,615) 
Price alignment interest (1)
—  (5,382) (229) 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in other income$(18,983) $(13,350) $(9,258) 

(1) Relates to derivatives for which variation margin payments are characterized as daily settled contracts. For 2019, the portion related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments is allocated to the applicable type of derivative.

Net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness previously presented in other income is presented in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019. Prior period amounts have not been reclassified. For more information, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.
122134
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents, by type of hedged item, the net gains (losses) on the derivatives and the related hedged items in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships and the effectimpact on net interest income.
Year Ended December 31, 2019AdvancesInvestmentsCO BondsTotal
Changes in fair value:
Year Ended December 31, 2020Year Ended December 31, 2020AdvancesInvestmentsCO BondsTotal
Changes in estimated fair value:Changes in estimated fair value:
Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)$318,284  $385,821  $(104,226) $599,879  Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)$382,311 $493,613 $(16,334)$859,590 
DerivativesDerivatives(317,351) (405,391) 99,348  (623,394) Derivatives(385,680)(507,927)21,632 (871,975)
Net changes in fair value before price alignment interest933  (19,570) (4,878) (23,515) 
Net changes in estimated fair value before price alignment interestNet changes in estimated fair value before price alignment interest(3,369)(14,314)5,298 (12,385)
Price alignment interest (1)
Price alignment interest (1)
1,047  (729) (244) 74  
Price alignment interest (1)
800 524 (165)1,159 
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2) (3)
61,614  31,242  (31,949) 60,907  
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2)
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2)
(135,342)(109,907)51,091 (194,158)
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationshipsAmortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationships(5) 426  (5,727) (5,306) Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationships(2)3,229 2,753 5,980 
Net gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationshipsNet gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships63,589  11,369  (42,798) 32,160  Net gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships(137,913)(120,468)58,977 (199,404)
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationshipsAmortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationships—  —  (141) (141) Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationships(142)(2,361)(36)(2,539)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
$63,589  $11,369  $(42,939) $32,019  
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
$(138,055)$(122,829)$58,941 $(201,943)
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Changes in fair value:
Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)$22,557  $(55,842) $24,419  $(8,866) 
Derivatives(18,331) 47,268  (25,394) 3,543  
Net changes in fair value (4)
4,226  (8,574) (975) (5,323) 
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2) (3)
48,555  18,391  (40,907) 26,039  
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationships(47) 276  (7,449) (7,220) 
Net gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships52,734  10,093  (49,331) 13,496  
Add: amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationships—  —  (137) (137) 
Less: net changes in fair value (4)
(4,226) 8,574  975  5,323  
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
$48,508  $18,667  $(48,493) $18,682  
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Changes in estimated fair value:
Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)$318,284 $385,821 $(104,226)$599,879 
Derivatives(317,351)(405,391)99,348 (623,394)
Net changes in estimated fair value before price alignment interest933 (19,570)(4,878)(23,515)
Price alignment interest (1)
1,047 (729)(244)74 
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2)
61,614 31,242 (31,949)60,907 
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationships(5)426 (5,727)(5,306)
Net gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships63,589 11,369 (42,798)32,160 
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationships(141)(141)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
$63,589 $11,369 $(42,939)$32,019 
Year Ended December 31, 2017
Changes in fair value:
Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)$(62,324) $(39,843) $43,993  $(58,174) 
Derivatives61,439  35,620  (46,299) 50,760  
Net changes in fair value (4)
(885) (4,223) (2,306) (7,414) 
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2) (3)
(31,461) (48,144) 16,289  (63,316) 
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationships(208) 1,560  231  1,583  
Net gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships(32,554) (50,807) 14,214  (69,147) 
Add: amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationships—  —  (133) (133) 
Less: net changes in fair value (4)
885  4,223  2,306  7,414  
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
$(31,669) $(46,584) $16,387  $(61,866) 

Year Ended December 31, 2018
Changes in estimated fair value:
Hedged items (attributable to risk being hedged)$22,557 $(55,842)$24,419 $(8,866)
Derivatives(18,331)47,268 (25,394)3,543 
Net changes in estimated fair value4,226 (8,574)(975)(5,323)
Net interest settlements on derivatives (2)
48,555 18,391 (40,907)26,039 
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on active hedging relationships(47)276 (7,449)(7,220)
Net gains (losses) on qualifying fair-value hedging relationships52,734 10,093 (49,331)13,496 
Amortization/accretion of gains (losses) on discontinued fair-value hedging relationships(137)(137)
Less: net changes in fair value (4)
(4,226)8,574 975 5,323 
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in net interest income (3)
$48,508 $18,667 $(48,493)$18,682 

123135
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

(1)    Relates to derivatives for which variation margin payments are characterized as daily settled contracts. In accordance with an amendment to accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019, the portion related to derivatives in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships was recorded prospectively in interest income instead of in other income.
(2)    Represents interest income/expense on derivatives in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships. Net interest settlements on derivatives that are not in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships are reported in other income.
(3)    Excludes the interest income/expense of the respective hedged items recorded in net interest income.
(4)    Net changes in fair value were not reported in net interest income infor the prior periods,year ended December 31, 2018, but are presented herein to conform and provide comparability to the presentation of the current period amounts.

As a result of hedge accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019, net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness previously presented in other income is presented in net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Amounts for the year ended December 31, 2018 have not been reclassified.

The following table presents the components of net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities reported in other income.
Years Ended December 31,
Type of Hedge202020192018
Net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness:
Interest-rate swaps$— $— $(5,323)
Total net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness— — (5,323)
Net gain (loss) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments:
Economic hedges:
Interest-rate swaps1,488 (6,950)7,071 
Swaptions(324)(1,308)(892)
Interest-rate caps/floors898 (784)(60)
Interest-rate forwards(13,377)(1,647)1,460 
Net interest settlements(46,927)(9,856)(7,834)
MDCs9,880 1,562 (2,390)
Total net gains (losses) on derivatives not designated as hedging instruments(48,362)(18,983)(2,645)
Price alignment interest (1)
(5,382)
Net gains (losses) on derivatives and hedging activities in other income$(48,362)$(18,983)$(13,350)

(1)    Relates to derivatives for which variation margin payments are characterized as daily settled contracts. For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, the portion related to derivatives not designated as hedging instruments is allocated to the applicable type of derivative.


136
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents the amortized cost of, and the related cumulative basis adjustments on, hedged items in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships.
December 31, 2019AdvancesInvestmentsCO Bonds
Amortized cost of hedged items (1)
$17,320,223  $8,394,665  $17,039,657  
Cumulative basis adjustments included in amortized cost:
For active fair-value hedging relationships$207,111  $150,372  $7,855  
For discontinued fair-value hedging relationships—  —  (36) 
Total cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments on hedged items (2)
$207,111  $150,372  $7,819  

December 31, 2020AdvancesInvestmentsCO Bonds
Amortized cost of hedged items (1)
$17,219,312 $9,882,225 $17,406,679 
Cumulative basis adjustments included in amortized cost:
For active fair-value hedging relationships (2)
$645,146 $501,865 $21,605 
For discontinued fair-value hedging relationships799 125,754 
Total cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments on hedged items$645,945 $627,619 $21,605 

December 31, 2019AdvancesInvestmentsCO Bonds
Amortized cost of hedged items (1)
$17,320,223 $8,394,665 $17,039,657 
Cumulative basis adjustments included in amortized cost:
For active fair-value hedging relationships (2)
$207,111 $150,372 $7,855 
For discontinued fair-value hedging relationships(36)
Total cumulative fair-value hedging basis adjustments on hedged items$207,111 $150,372 $7,819 

(1)    Includes only the portion of the amortized cost of the hedged items in qualifying fair-value hedging relationships.
(2)    Excludes any offsetting effect of the net estimated fair value of the associated derivatives.

Note 109 - Deposit Liabilities

We offer demand and overnight deposits to members and qualifying non-members. In addition, we offer short-term interest-bearing deposit programs to members. A member that services mortgage loans may deposit funds collected in connection with the mortgage loans, pending disbursement of such funds to the owners of the mortgage loans. We classify these items as other deposits.

Demand, overnight, and other deposits pay interest based on a daily interest rate. Time deposits pay interest based on a fixed rate determined at the origination of the deposit.

The following table presents the types of our interest-bearing and non-interest-bearing deposits.
TypeDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Interest-bearing:
Demand and overnight$905,382  $434,557  
Other658  12  
Total interest-bearing906,040  434,569  
Non-interest-bearing:
  
Other (1)
54,264  65,871  
Total non-interest-bearing54,264  65,871  
Total deposits$960,304  $500,440  

TypeDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Interest-bearing:
Demand and overnight$1,372,863 $905,382 
Other579 658 
Total interest-bearing1,373,442 906,040 
Non-interest-bearing:
  
Demand258 
Other (1)
1,506 54,264 
Total non-interest-bearing1,764 54,264 
Total deposits$1,375,206 $960,304 

(1)     Includes pass-through deposit reserves from members.
124137
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1110 - Consolidated Obligations

Consolidated obligations consist of CO bonds and discount notes. CO bonds may be issued to raise short-, intermediate- and long-term funds for the FHLBanks and are not subject to any statutory or regulatory limits on maturity. Discount notes are issued primarily to raise short-term funds and have original maturities of up to one year. These notes generally sell at less than their face amount and are redeemed at par value when they mature.

The FHLBanks issue consolidated obligations through the Office of Finance as ourtheir agent under the oversight of the Finance Agency and the United States Secretary of the Treasury. In connection with each debt issuance, each FHLBank specifies the amount of debt to be issued on its behalf. Each FHLBank records as a liability the specific portion of consolidated obligations issued on its behalf and for which it is the primary obligor.

In addition to being the primary obligor for all consolidated obligations issued on our behalf, we are jointly and severally liable with each of the other FHLBanks for the payment of the principal and interest on all of the FHLBanks' outstanding consolidated obligations.obligations outstanding. The par values of the FHLBanks' outstanding consolidated obligations outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaled$746.8 billion and $1.0 trillion, at both December 31, 2019 and 2018.respectively. As provided by the Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations, consolidated obligations are backed only by the financial resources of all FHLBanks.

The Finance Agency, in its discretion, may require any FHLBank to make principal or interest payments due on any consolidated obligation whether or not the consolidated obligation represents a primary liability of that FHLBank. Although an FHLBank has never paid the principal or interest payments due on a consolidated obligation on behalf of another FHLBank, if that event should occur, Finance Agency regulations provide that the paying FHLBank is entitled to reimbursement for any payments made on behalf of another FHLBank and other associated costs, including interest to be determined by the Finance Agency. If, however, the Finance Agency determines that such other FHLBank is unable to satisfy its repayment obligations to the paying FHLBank, then the Finance Agency may allocate the outstanding liability of such other FHLBank among the remaining FHLBanks on a pro-rata basis in proportion to their participation in all outstanding consolidated obligations, or in any other manner it may determine to ensure that the FHLBanks operate in a safe and sound manner. We do not believe that it is probable that we will be asked or required to make principal or interest payments on behalf of another FHLBank.

Discount Notes. The following table presents our discount notes outstanding, all of which are due within one year of issuance.
Discount NotesDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Book value$17,676,793  $20,895,262  
Par value$17,713,204  $20,952,650  
Weighted average effective interest rate1.59 %2.34 %

Discount NotesDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Book value$16,617,079 $17,676,793 
Par value$16,620,486 $17,713,204 
Weighted average effective interest rate0.12 %1.59 %

CO Bonds. The following table presents our CO bonds outstanding by contractual maturity.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Year of Contractual MaturityAmountWAIR%AmountWAIR%
Due in 1 year or less$23,404,785  1.88  $18,456,870  2.07  
Due after 1 year through 2 years6,881,120  1.93  8,823,285  2.30  
Due after 2 years through 3 years4,020,790  2.10  2,640,620  2.42  
Due after 3 years through 4 years1,234,375  2.18  3,024,000  2.33  
Due after 4 years through 5 years3,471,250  2.11  998,375  2.54  
Thereafter5,650,600  3.11  6,431,700  3.21  
Total CO bonds, par value44,662,920  2.09  40,374,850  2.36  
Unamortized premiums67,708   23,493   
Unamortized discounts(13,321)  (15,992)  
Unamortized concessions(9,902) (14,085) 
Fair-value hedging basis adjustments, net7,819   (102,801)  
Total CO bonds$44,715,224   $40,265,465   

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Year of Contractual MaturityAmountWAIR%AmountWAIR%
Due in 1 year or less$31,126,310 0.29 $23,404,785 1.88 
Due after 1 year through 2 years4,109,700 0.70 6,881,120 1.93 
Due after 2 years through 3 years1,753,010 1.34 4,020,790 2.10 
Due after 3 years through 4 years767,250 1.93 1,234,375 2.18 
Due after 4 years through 5 years837,300 1.13 3,471,250 2.11 
Thereafter4,652,000 2.91 5,650,600 3.11 
Total CO bonds, par value43,245,570 0.70 44,662,920 2.09 
Unamortized premiums87,133  67,708  
Unamortized discounts(12,703) (13,321) 
Unamortized concessions(8,659)(9,902)
Fair-value hedging basis adjustments, net21,605  7,819  
Total CO bonds$43,332,946  $44,715,224  
125138
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Consolidated obligations are issued with either fixed-rate or variable-rate coupon payment terms that may use a variety of indices for interest-rate resets, such as LIBOR or SOFR. To meet the specific needs of certain investors in CO bonds, both fixed-rate and variable-rate CO bonds may contain features that result in complex coupon payment terms and call options. When these CO bonds are issued, we may enter into derivatives containing features that offset the terms and embedded options, if any, of the CO bonds.

CO bonds may also be callable. Such bonds may be redeemed in whole or in part, at our discretion, on predetermined call dates according to the terms of the offerings.

The following tables present the par value of our CO bonds outstanding by redemption feature and the earlier of the year of contractual maturity or next call date.
Redemption FeatureDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Non-callable / non-putable$28,829,420  $27,462,850  
Callable15,833,500  12,912,000  
Total CO bonds, par value$44,662,920  $40,374,850  

Redemption FeatureDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Non-callable / non-putable$36,809,070 $28,829,420 
Callable6,436,500 15,833,500 
Total CO bonds, par value$43,245,570 $44,662,920 

Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call DateYear of Contractual Maturity or Next Call DateDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018Year of Contractual Maturity or Next Call DateDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Due in 1 year or lessDue in 1 year or less$36,243,785  $30,331,870  Due in 1 year or less$34,272,810 $36,243,785 
Due after 1 year through 2 yearsDue after 1 year through 2 years4,484,620  6,069,285  Due after 1 year through 2 years4,159,700 4,484,620 
Due after 2 years through 3 yearsDue after 2 years through 3 years742,790  1,043,620  Due after 2 years through 3 years1,608,010 742,790 
Due after 3 years through 4 yearsDue after 3 years through 4 years516,375  626,000  Due after 3 years through 4 years443,750 516,375 
Due after 4 years through 5 yearsDue after 4 years through 5 years380,750  503,375  Due after 4 years through 5 years563,300 380,750 
ThereafterThereafter2,294,600  1,800,700  Thereafter2,198,000 2,294,600 
Total CO bonds, par valueTotal CO bonds, par value$44,662,920  $40,374,850  Total CO bonds, par value$43,245,570 $44,662,920 

Interest-Rate Payment Types. In addition to CO bonds beyond havingwith fixed-rate or simple variable-rate interest payment terms, may also have the following features:

Step-upstep-up CO bonds pay interest at increasing fixed rates for specified intervals over their lives. These CO bondslives and generally contain provisions enabling us to call them at our option on the step-up dates;
Ratchet CO bonds pay a floating interest rate indexed on a reference range such as LIBOR. Each floating rate is subject to increasing floors, such that subsequent rates may not be lower than the previous rate; or
Conversion CO bonds have interest rates that convert from fixed to variable, or variable to fixed, or from one index to another, on predetermined dates according to the terms of the offerings.dates.

The following table presents the par value of our CO bonds outstanding by interest-rate payment type.
Interest-Rate Payment TypeDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Fixed-rate$27,565,920  $27,189,850  
Step-up30,000  330,000  
Simple variable-rate17,067,000  12,855,000  
Total CO bonds, par value$44,662,920  $40,374,850  

Interest-Rate Payment TypeDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Fixed-rate$24,750,570 $27,565,920 
Step-up15,000 30,000 
Simple variable-rate18,480,000 17,067,000 
Total CO bonds, par value$43,245,570 $44,662,920 

126139
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1211 - Affordable Housing Program

The Bank Act requires each FHLBank to establish an AHP, in which the FHLBank provides subsidies in the form of direct grants to members that use the funds to assist in the purchase, construction, or rehabilitation of housing for very low-, low-, and moderate-income households. Annually, the FHLBanks must set aside for the AHP the greater of the aggregate of $100 million or 10% of each FHLBank's net earnings. For purposes of the AHP calculation, net earnings is defined in a Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin as income before assessments, plus interest expense related to MRCS.

The following table summarizes the activity in our AHP funding obligation.
AHP Activity201920182017
Liability at beginning of year$40,747  $32,166  $26,598  
Assessment (expense)17,071  22,570  18,163  
Subsidy usage, net (1)
(19,734) (13,989) (12,595) 
Liability at end of year$38,084  $40,747  $32,166  

AHP Activity202020192018
Liability at beginning of year$38,084 $40,747 $32,166 
Assessment (expense)10,717 17,071 22,570 
Subsidy usage, net (1)
(14,399)(19,734)(13,989)
Liability at end of year$34,402 $38,084 $40,747 

(1)    Subsidies disbursed are reported net of returns/recaptures of previously disbursed subsidies.

As a part of the AHP, each FHLBank may also provide advances to members at interest rates below then current market rates.

Note 1312 - Capital

We are a cooperative whose member and former member institutions own all of our capital stock. Former members (including certain non-member institutions that own our capital stock as a result of a merger with or acquisition of a member) own our capital stock solely to support credit products or mortgage loans still outstanding on our statement of condition. Member shares cannot be purchased or sold except between us and our members or, with our written approval, among our members, at the par value of one hundred100 dollars per share, as mandated by our capital plan and Finance Agency regulation.

OurClasses of Capital Stock. We amended and restated our capital plan effective September 26, 2020. The amended plan, like the prior plan, divides our Class B stock into two2 sub-series: Class B-1 and Class B-2. However, under the amended plan, any Class B stock supporting activity requirements is classified as B-2, while all other Class B stock is classified as B-1. A member's Class B-1 stock is reclassified as B-2 as needed to help fulfill the member's activity-based stock requirement, and the member may be required to purchase additional Class B-2 stock consiststo fully meet that requirement. Any excess stock is automatically classified as Class B-1.

Under the amended capital plan, PFIs may opt in to an activity-based stock requirement in connection with their sales of mortgage loans to us under Advantage MPP. PFIs may elect this stock requirement each time they enter into an MDC with us based on the outstanding principal balance of loans purchased under the designated MDC. As of December 31, 2020, such Class B-2 stock issued and outstanding totaled $4,784.

The amended capital plan also permits the board of directors to authorize the issuance of Class A stock although, as of December 31, 2020, the board of directors had not authorized such issuance. If authorized, a member may elect to purchase Class A stock, rather than Class B-2 stock, to satisfy the member’s activity-based stock requirement, subject to certain restrictions.

Under our prior capital plan, Class B-1 was stock held by our members that was not subject to a redemption request. Class B-2 stock consisted solely of required stock that iswas subject to a redemption request. The Class B-2 dividend is presently calculated at 80% of the amount of the Class B-1 dividend; this ratio can only be changed by amendment of our capital plan by our board of directors with approval of the Finance Agency.


140
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents the capital stock outstanding by sub-series under the prior and amended capital plans.

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Prior capital plan
Class B-1 issued and outstanding shares: 19,737,727$— $1,973,773 
Class B-2 issued and outstanding shares: 3,028— 303 
Amended capital plan
Class B-1 issued and outstanding shares: 7,971,952797,196 — 
Class B-2 issued and outstanding shares: 14,103,7441,410,374 — 
Total Class B issued and outstanding shares: 22,075,696 and 19,740,755, respectively$2,207,570 $1,974,076 

Dividends. Our board of directors may, but is not required to, declare and pay dividends on our Class B stock in either cash or capital stock or a combination thereof, as long as we are in compliance with Finance Agency regulations. The amount of the dividend to be paid is based on the average number of shares of each sub-series held by the member during the dividend payment period (applicable quarter).

Under our prior capital plan (which was in effect through September 25, 2020), the Class B-2 dividend was calculated at 80% of the amount of the Class B-1 dividend. The amended plan, however, does not mandate a specific difference between Class B-1 and Class B-2 dividend rates. Rather, the board of directors may declare a dividend rate on Class B-2 stock that is equal to or greater than the rate on Class B-1 stock. The plan also authorizes the board of directors to declare a dividend rate on Class A stock (if issued and outstanding) that is equal to or greater than the rate on Class B-1 stock.

Stock Redemption and Repurchase. In accordance with the Bank Act, our Class Bcapital stock is considered putable by the member. Members can redeem Class B stock, subject to certain restrictions, by giving five years' written notice. Our amended capital plan does not reclassify Class B-1 stock under redemption as Class B-2. Members can redeem Class A stock, subject to certain restrictions, by giving six months written notice. Any member that withdraws from membership or otherwise has had its membership terminated may not be readmitted as a member for a period of five years from the divestiture date for all capital stock that was held as a condition of membership, as set forth in our capital plan and Finance Agency regulations, unless the member has canceled or revoked its notice of withdrawal prior to the end of the five-yearapplicable redemption period. This restriction does not apply if the member is transferring its membership from one FHLBank to another on an uninterrupted basis.

We may repurchase, at our sole discretion, any member's Class Bcapital stock that exceeds the required minimum amount. However, there areamount, subject to significant statutory and regulatory restrictions on our right to repurchase, or obligation to redeem, the outstanding stock. As a result, whether or not a member may have its Class Bcapital stock repurchased or redeemed will depend, in part, on whether we are in compliance with those restrictions.

Consistent with our amended capital plan, we are not required to redeem activity-basedrequired stock until the expiration of the notice of redemption, or until the activity to which the capital stock relates no longer remains outstanding, whichever is later. If activity-based stock becomes excess stock (i.e., the amount of stock held by a member or former member in excess of ourthe stock ownership requirement for that institution) as a result of an activity no longer remaining outstanding, we may redeemrepurchase the excess stock at our discretion, subject to the statutory and regulatory restrictions onrestrictions.

A member may cancel or revoke its written notice of redemption or its notice of withdrawal from membership prior to the conclusion of the applicable redemption period. However, our capital stock redemption.plan provides that we may charge a cancellation fee to a member that cancels or revokes its withdrawal notice.


127141
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

A member may cancel or revoke its written notice of redemption or its notice of withdrawal from membership prior to the five-year redemption period. However, our capital plan provides that we may charge a cancellation fee to a member that cancels or revokes its withdrawal notice.

Through December 31, 2019,2020, certain members had requested redemptions of their Class B stock, but the related stock outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019 totaling $314 and 2018 totaling $935, respectively, was not considered mandatorily redeemable and reclassified to MRCS because the requesting members may revoke their requests, without substantial penalty, throughout the five-yearfive-year waiting period. Therefore, these requests are not considered sufficiently substantive in nature. However, we consider redemption requests related to mergers, acquisitions or charter terminations, as well as involuntary terminations from membership, to be sufficiently substantive when made and, therefore, the related stock is considered mandatorily redeemable and reclassified to MRCS.

Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock. The following table presents the activity in our MRCS.
MRCS Activity201920182017
Liability at beginning of year$168,876  $164,322  $170,043  
Reclassification from capital stock150,978  31,214  —  
Proceeds from issuance (1)
3,704  —  —  
Redemptions/repurchases(1,255) (26,698) (5,721) 
Accrued distributions599  38  —  
Liability at end of year$322,902  $168,876  $164,322  

MRCS Activity202020192018
Liability at beginning of year$322,902 $168,876 $164,322 
Reclassification from capital stock32,791 150,978 31,214 
Proceeds from issuance (1)
3,704 
Redemptions/repurchases(104,965)(1,255)(26,698)
Accrued distributions40 599 38 
Liability at end of year$250,768 $322,902 $168,876 

(1)    Represents a purchase of capital stock by a captive insurance company member, which is considered mandatorily redeemable as a result of the Final Membership Rule.

In accordance with the Final Membership Rule, captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLBank members on or after September 12, 2014 had their memberships terminated by February 19, 2017. All of their outstanding Class B stock, totaling $3,021 at December 31, 2016, was repurchased on or before February 19, 2017.

Captive insurance companies that were admitted as FHLBank members prior to September 12, 2014, and dodid not meet the definition of "insurance company" or fall within another category of institution that is eligible for FHLBank membership under the Final Membership Rule, shall havehad their memberships terminated no later thanby February 19, 2021. Upon termination, their outstanding excess Class B stock will bewas repurchased or redeemed in accordance with the Final Membership Rule.


128
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents MRCS by contractual year of redemption. The year of redemption is the later of: (i) the final year of the five-year redemption period, or (ii) the first year in which a non-member no longer has an activity-based stock requirement.
MRCS Contractual Year of RedemptionDecember 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Year 1(1)
$680  $1,316  
Year 28,649  —  
Year 3—  8,649  
Year 426,723  —  
Year 5150,958  26,723  
Thereafter (2)
135,892  132,188  
Total MRCS$322,902  $168,876  

MRCS Contractual Year of RedemptionDecember 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Year 1(1)
$9,274 $680 
Year 28,649 
Year 326,723 
Year 4150,957 26,723 
Year 532,791 150,958 
Thereafter (2)
31,023 135,892 
Total MRCS$250,768 $322,902 

(1)    Balances at December 31, 2020 and 2019 include $624 and 2018 include $681 and $1,304,$680, respectively, of Class B stock that had reached the end of the five-year redemption period but will not be redeemed until the associated credit products and other obligations are no longer outstanding.
(2)    Represents the five-year redemption period of Class B stock held by certain captive insurance companies which beginsbegan immediately upon their respective terminations of membership no later thanon February 19, 2021, in accordance with the Final Membership Ru2021.le. However, upon their respective terminations, we currently intend to repurchaserepurchased their excess stock, (if any) in accordance with our capital plan, the balancesbalance of which at December 31, 2019 and 20182020 totaled $61,642 and $57,938, respectively.$18,059.

142
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

When a member's membership status changes to a non-member, the member's capital stock is reclassified to MRCS. If such change occurs during a quarterly dividend period, but not at the beginning or the end of a quarterly period, any dividends for that quarterly period are allocated between distributions from retained earnings for the shares held as capital stock during that period and interest expense for the shares held as MRCS during that period. Therefore, the distributions from retained earnings represent dividends to former members for only the portion of the period that they were members. The amounts recorded to interest expense represent dividends to former members for the portion of that period and subsequent periods that they were not members.

The following table presents the distributions related to MRCS.
Years Ended December 31,Years Ended December 31,
MRCS DistributionsMRCS Distributions201920182017MRCS Distributions202020192018
Recorded as interest expenseRecorded as interest expense$11,863  $8,391  $7,034  Recorded as interest expense$8,594 $11,863 $8,391 
Recorded as distributions from retained earningsRecorded as distributions from retained earnings599  38  —  Recorded as distributions from retained earnings40 599 38 
TotalTotal$12,462  $8,429  $7,034  Total$8,634 $12,462 $8,429 

Restricted Retained Earnings. In 2011, we entered into a JCE Agreement with all of the other FHLBanks to enhance the capital position of each FHLBank. In accordance with the JCE Agreement, we allocate 20% of our net income to a separate restricted retained earnings account until the balance of that account, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, equals at least 1% of the average balance of our outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter.quarter. These restricted retained earnings are not available from which to pay dividends except to the extent the restricted retained earnings balance exceeds 1.5% of the average balance of our outstanding consolidated obligations for the previous quarter.

129
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Capital Requirements. We are subject to 3 capital requirements under our capital plan and Finance Agency regulations:

(i)Risk-based capital. We must maintain at all times permanent capital, defined as Class B stock (including MRCS) and retained earnings, in an amount at least equal to the sum of our credit risk, market risk, and operations risk capital requirements, all of which are calculated in accordance with Finance Agency regulations. The Finance Agency may require us to maintain a greater amount of permanent capital than is required by the risk-based capital requirements as defined.
(ii)Total regulatory capital. We are required to maintain at all times a total capital-to-assets ratio of at least 4%. Total regulatory capital is the sum of permanent capital, any general loss allowance, if consistent with GAAP and not established for specific assets, and other amounts from sources determined by the Finance Agency as available to absorb losses. For regulatory capital purposes, AOCI is not considered capital.
(iii)Leverage capital. We are required to maintain at all times a leverage capital-to-assets ratio of at least 5%. Leverage capital is defined as the sum of (i) permanent capital weighted 1.5 times and (ii) all other capital without a weighting factor.

As presented in the following table, we were in compliance with these Finance Agency's capital requirements at December 31, 20192020 and 2018.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Regulatory Capital RequirementsRequiredActualRequiredActual
Risk-based capital$639,495  $3,412,286  $786,925  $3,177,638  
Total regulatory capital$2,700,431  $3,412,286  $2,616,468  $3,177,638  
Total regulatory capital-to-assets ratio4.00 %5.05 %4.00 %4.86 %
Leverage capital$3,375,539  $5,118,429  $3,270,585  $4,766,457  
Leverage ratio5.00 %7.58 %5.00 %7.29 %
2019.

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Regulatory Capital RequirementsRequiredActualRequiredActual
Risk-based capital$630,661$3,595,668$639,495$3,412,286
Total regulatory capital$2,636,990$3,595,668$2,700,431$3,412,286
Total regulatory capital-to-assets ratio4.00%5.45%4.00%5.05%
Leverage capital$3,296,238$5,393,502$3,375,539$5,118,429
Leverage ratio5.00%8.18%5.00%7.58%


130143
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Partial Recovery of Prior Capital Distribution to Financing Corporation. The Competitive Equality Banking Act of 1987 was enacted in August 1987, which, among other things, provided for the recapitalization of the Federal Savings and Loan Insurance Corporation through a newly-chartered entity, FICO. The capitalization of FICO was provided by capital distributions from the FHLBanks to FICO in 1987, 1988 and 1989 that aggregated to $680 million in exchange for FICO nonvoting capital stock. Upon passage of the Financial Institutions Reform, Recovery and Enforcement Act of 1989, the Bank's previous investment in capital stock of FICO was determined to be non-redeemable and, therefore, the Bank charged-off its prior capital distributions to FICO directly against retained earnings.

Upon the dissolution of FICO in October 2019, FICO determined that excess funds aggregating to $200 million were available for distribution to its sole stockholders, the FHLBanks. Specifically, the Bank received $10,574 during the year ended December 31, 2020 which was determined based on our proportionate ownership of FICO's nonvoting capital stock. The Bank treated the receipt of these funds as a partial recovery of the prior capital distributions made by the Bank to FICO. These funds were credited to unrestricted retained earnings.

Note 1413 - Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

The following table presents a summary of the changes in the components of AOCI.
AOCI RollforwardAOCI RollforwardUnrealized Gains (Losses) on AFS Securities Non-Credit OTTI on AFS Securities  Non-Credit OTTI on HTM Securities  Pension Benefits  Total AOCI  AOCI RollforwardUnrealized Gains (Losses) on AFS SecuritiesNon-Credit OTTI on AFS SecuritiesNon-Credit OTTI on HTM SecuritiesPension BenefitsTotal AOCI
Balance, December 31, 2016$39,468  $26,938  $(103) $(9,935) $56,368  
OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)53,051  2,189  —  —  55,240  
Net change in fair value—  29  —  —  29  
Accretion of non-credit losses—  —  10  —  10  
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Non-credit portion of OTTI losses—  166  42  —  208  
Pension benefits, net—  —  —  (449) (449) 
Total other comprehensive income (loss)53,051  2,384  52  (449) 55,038  
Balance, December 31, 2017Balance, December 31, 2017$92,519  $29,322  $(51) $(10,384) $111,406  Balance, December 31, 2017$92,519 $29,322 $(51)$(10,384)$111,406 
OCI before reclassifications:OCI before reclassifications:OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)Net change in unrealized gains (losses)(39,533) 392  —  —  (39,141) Net change in unrealized gains (losses)(39,533)392 (39,141)
Net change in fair valueNet change in fair value—  2,693  —  —  2,693  Net change in fair value2,693 2,693 
Accretion of non-credit lossesAccretion of non-credit losses—  —  51  —  51  Accretion of non-credit losses51 51 
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:Reclassifications from OCI to net income:Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securitiesNet realized gains from sale of AFS securities—  (32,407) —  —  (32,407) Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities(32,407)(32,407)
Non-credit portion of OTTI lossesNon-credit portion of OTTI losses
Pension benefits, netPension benefits, net—  —  —  (915) (915) Pension benefits, net(915)(915)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)Total other comprehensive income (loss)(39,533) (29,322) 51  (915) (69,719) Total other comprehensive income (loss)(39,533)(29,322)51 (915)(69,719)
Balance, December 31, 2018Balance, December 31, 2018$52,986  $—  $—  $(11,299) $41,687  Balance, December 31, 2018$52,986 $$$(11,299)$41,687 
OCI before reclassifications:OCI before reclassifications:OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)Net change in unrealized gains (losses)36,827  —  —  —  36,827  Net change in unrealized gains (losses)36,827 36,827 
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:Reclassifications from OCI to net income:Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Pension benefits, netPension benefits, net—  —  —  (11,138) (11,138) Pension benefits, net(11,138)(11,138)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)Total other comprehensive income (loss)36,827  —  —  (11,138) 25,689  Total other comprehensive income (loss)36,827 (11,138)25,689 
Balance, December 31, 2019Balance, December 31, 2019$89,813  $—  $—  $(22,437) $67,376  Balance, December 31, 2019$89,813 $$$(22,437)$67,376 
OCI before reclassifications:OCI before reclassifications:
Net change in unrealized gains (losses)Net change in unrealized gains (losses)47,108 47,108 
Reclassifications from OCI to net income:Reclassifications from OCI to net income:
Pension benefits, netPension benefits, net(9,082)(9,082)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)Total other comprehensive income (loss)47,108 (9,082)38,026 
Balance, December 31, 2020Balance, December 31, 2020$136,921 $$$(31,519)$105,402 

131144
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1514 - Employee and Director Retirement and Deferred Compensation Plans

Qualified Defined Benefit Pension Plan. We participate in a tax-qualified, defined-benefitdefined benefit pension plan for financial institutions administered by Pentegra Retirement Services. This DB Plan is treated as a multiemployer plan for accounting purposes but operates as a multiple-employer plan under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 and the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, certain multiemployer plan disclosures are not applicable.

Under the DB Plan, contributions made by a participating employer may be used to provide benefits to employees of other participating employers because assets contributed by an employer are not segregated in a separate account or restricted to provide benefits to employees of that employer only. Also, in the event that a participating employer is unable to meet its contribution or funding requirements, the required contributions for the other participating employers (including us) could increase proportionately.

Our contributions to the DB Plan for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 were not more than 5% of the total contributions to the DB Plan by all participating employers for the plan years ended June 30, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Our DB Plan covers our officers and employees who meet certain eligibility requirements, including an employment date prior to February 1, 2010. The DB Plan operates on a fiscal year from July 1 through June 30 and files one Form 5500 on behalf of all participating employers. The most recent Form 5500 available for the DB Plan is for the plan year ended June 30, 2018.2019. The Employer Identification Number is 13-5645888 and the three digit plan number is 333. There are no collective bargaining agreements in place.

The DB Plan's annual valuation process includes calculating its funded status and separately calculating the funded status of each participating employer. The funded status is calculated as the market value of plan assets divided by the funding target (100% of the present value of all benefit liabilities accrued at that date utilizing the discount rate prescribed by statute). The calculation of the funding target as of July 1, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 incorporated a higher discount rate in accordance with MAP-21, which resulted in a lower funding target and a higher funded status. Over time, the favorable impact of MAP-21 is expected to decline. As permitted by the Employee Retirement IncomeIncome Security Act of 1974, the DB Plan accepts contributions for the prior plan year up to eighteight and a half months after the asset valuation date. As a result, the market value of plan assets at the valuation date (July 1) will increase by any subsequent contributions designated for the immediately preceding plan year ended June 30.

Our contributions to the DB Plan for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were not more than 5% of the total contributions to the DB Plan by all participating employers for the plan years ended June 30, 2018, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

The following table presents a summary of net pension costs charged to compensation and benefits expense and the DB Plan's funded status.
DB Plan Net Pension Cost and Funded Status201920182017
Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefits expense for the year ended December 31(1)
$3,500  $2,750  $4,450  
DB Plan funded status as July 1109 %
(a)
110 %
(b)
112 %
Our funded status as of July 1109 %116 %117 %

DB Plan Net Pension Cost and Funded Status202020192018
Net pension cost charged to compensation and benefits expense
for the year ended December 31(1)
$3,211$3,500$2,750
DB Plan funded status as July 1108 %(a)109 %(b)110 %
Our funded status as of July 1104 %109 %116 %

(1)    Includes voluntary contributions for the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 20172018 of $1,944, $2,856, $2,240, and $3,893,$2,240, respectively.
(a)    The DB Plan's funded status as of July 1, 20192020 is preliminary and may increase because the participating employers are permitted to make designated contributions for the plan year ended June 30, 20192020 through March 15, 2020.2021. Any such contributions will be included in the final valuation as of July 1, 2019.2020. The final funded status as of July 1, 2020 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year ended June 30, 2021 is filed (no later than April 2022).
(b)    The DB Plan's final funded status as of July 1, 2019 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year ended June 30, 2020 is filed (no later than April 2021).
(b) The DB Plan's final funded status as of July 1, 2018 will not be available until the Form 5500 for the plan year ended June 30, 2019 is filed (no later than April 2020).


132145
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Qualified Defined Contribution Plan. We participateThe Bank participated in a tax-qualified multiple-employer defined contributionretirement savings plan for financial institutions administered by Pentegra Retirement Services. through October 1, 2020. Effective October 2, 2020, the Bank adopted a tax-qualified single-employer plan. The terms of such plans are substantially the same.

This DC plan covers our officers and employees who meet certain eligibility requirements. OurThe Bank makes a matching contribution is equal to a percentage of voluntary employee contributions, subject to certain limitations. In addition, the Bank makes a non-elective contribution to the account of each participant who is not eligible to participate in the Bank's DB plan. During the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018, and 2017,2018, we contributed $2,810, $2,778 $2,478, and $1,577,$2,478, respectively.

Nonqualified Supplemental Defined Benefit Supplemental Retirement Plan. We participate in a nonqualified, single-employer, non-qualified, unfunded supplemental executive retirement plan administered by Pentegra Retirement Services.plan. This SERP restores all of the defined benefits to participating employees who have had their qualified defined benefits limited by Internal Revenue Service regulations. Because the SERP is a non-qualifiednonqualified unfunded plan, no contributions are required to be made. However, we may elect to make contributions to a related grantor trust that we established to indirectly fund the SERP in order to maintain a desired funding level. Payments of benefits may be made from the related grantor trust or from our general assets.

The following table presents the changes in our SERP benefit obligation.
Change in benefit obligation201920182017
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year$27,593  $23,176  $20,022  
 Service cost1,636  1,762  1,035  
 Interest cost1,039  863  738  
 Actuarial loss13,079  3,452  1,712  
 Benefits paid(628) (1,660) (331) 
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$42,719  $27,593  $23,176  

Change in benefit obligation202020192018
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year$42,719 $27,593 $23,176 
 Service cost2,489 1,636 1,762 
 Interest cost1,086 1,039 863 
 Actuarial loss12,551 13,079 3,452 
 Benefits paid(515)(628)(1,660)
Projected benefit obligation at end of year$58,330 $42,719 $27,593 

The measurement dateactuarial loss includes the impact of the changes in the discount rate, compensation, mortality, demographics and other components used to determine our SERPcalculate the projected benefit obligation wasat December 31. 31 of each year.

The following table presents the key assumptions used in the actuarial calculations of the benefit obligation.
 December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Discount rate2.55 %3.64 %
Compensation increases5.50 %5.50 %

December 31,
 202020192018
Discount rate1.54 %2.55 %3.64 %
Compensation increases5.50 %5.50 %5.50 %

The discount rate represents a weighted average that was determined by a discounted cash-flow approach, which incorporates the timing of each expected future benefit payment. We estimate future benefit payments based on the census data of the SERP's participants, benefit formulas and provisions, and valuation assumptions reflecting the probability of decrement and survival. We then determine the present value of the future benefit payments by using duration-based interest-rate yields from the Financial Times Stock Exchange Group Pension Discount Curve as of the measurement date, and solving for the single discount rate that produces the same present value of the future benefit payments.

The accumulated benefit obligation for the SERP, which excludes projected future salary increases was $31,595 and $20,677 as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $42,739 and 2018,$31,595, respectively.

The unfunded benefit obligation is reported in other liabilities. Although there are no plan assets, the assets in the related grantor trust, included as a component of other assets, had a total estimated fair value of $21,983 and $18,916 at December 31, 2020 and 2019 of $45,200 and 2018,$21,983, respectively.

133146
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents the components of the net periodic benefit cost and the amounts recognized in OCI for the SERP. 
 Years Ended December 31,
201920182017
Net periodic benefit cost:
 Service cost$1,636  $1,762  $1,035  
Net periodic benefit cost recognized in compensation and benefits1,636  1,762  1,035  
 Interest cost1,039  863  738  
 Amortization of prior service benefit—  —  —  
 Amortization of net actuarial loss1,941  2,539  1,263  
Net periodic benefit cost recognized in other expenses2,980  3,402  2,001  
Total net periodic benefit cost recognized in the statement of income4,616  5,164  3,036  
Amounts recognized in OCI:
 Actuarial loss13,079  3,452  1,712  
 Amortization of net actuarial loss(1,941) (2,539) (1,263) 
Net loss recognized in OCI11,138  913  449  
Total recognized as net periodic benefit cost$15,754  $6,077  $3,485  

 Years Ended December 31,
202020192018
Net periodic benefit cost:
 Service cost$2,489 $1,636 $1,762 
Net periodic benefit cost recognized in compensation and benefits2,489 1,636 1,762 
 Interest cost1,086 1,039 863 
 Amortization of net actuarial loss3,469 1,941 2,539 
Net periodic benefit cost recognized in other expenses4,555 2,980 3,402 
Total net periodic benefit cost recognized in the statement of income7,044 4,616 5,164 
Amounts recognized in OCI:
 Actuarial loss12,551 13,079 3,452 
 Amortization of net actuarial loss(3,469)(1,941)(2,539)
Net loss recognized in OCI9,082 11,138 913 
Total recognized as net periodic benefit cost$16,126 $15,754 $6,077 

The following table presents the key assumptions used in the actuarial calculations to determine net periodic benefit cost for the SERP.
Years Ended December 31, Years Ended December 31,
201920182017 202020192018
Discount rateDiscount rate3.64 %3.00 %4.00 %Discount rate2.55 3.64 %3.00 %
Compensation increasesCompensation increases5.50 %5.50 %5.50 %Compensation increases5.50 %5.50 %5.50 %

The following table presents the components of the pension benefits reported in AOCI related to the SERP. 
 December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Net actuarial loss$(22,436) $(11,298) 
Net pension benefits reported in AOCI$(22,436) $(11,298) 

The following table presents the amounts that will be amortized from AOCI into net periodic benefit cost during the year ending December 31, 2020.
Year Ending December 31, 2020
Net actuarial loss$2,829 
Net amount to be amortized$2,829 
 December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Net actuarial loss$(31,519)$(22,436)
Net pension benefits reported in AOCI$(31,519)$(22,436)

The net periodic benefit cost for the SERP, including the net amount to be amortized, for the year ending December 31, 20202021 is projected to be approximately $6,110.$7,903.

134
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents the estimated future benefit payments reflecting scheduled benefit payments for retired participants and the estimated payments to active participants, based on the actual form of payment elected by the participant and weighting the value of the participant's benefits based on the probability of the participant retiring.
For the Years Ending December 31,
2020$4,836  
20213,756  
202213,753  
20232,616  
20241,540  
2025 - 202910,408  
Actual payments may differ.

For the Years Ending December 31,
2021$5,712 
202221,463 
20233,561 
20242,170 
20252,552 
2026 - 203016,644 


147
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Nonqualified Supplemental Executive Thrift Plan. Effective January 1, 2016, we offer the SETP, a voluntary, non-qualified,nonqualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan that permits certain officers and approved employees of the Bank to elect to defer certain components of their compensation. The SETP constitutes a deferred compensation arrangement that complies with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. The SETP provides that, subject to certain limitations, the Bank will make matching contributions to the participant's deferred contribution account each plan year. For the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 2018 and 2017,2018, we contributed $125, $73 $70 and $52$70, respectively, to the SETP and our liability at December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 was $1,973$2,988 and $1,127,$1,973, respectively.

Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan. Effective January 1, 2016, we offer the DDCP, a voluntary, non-qualified,nonqualified, unfunded deferred compensation plan that permits our directors to defer all or a portion of the fees payable to them for a calendar year for their services as directors. The DDCP constitutes a deferred compensation arrangement that complies with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended. Any duly elected and serving member of our board may participate in the DDCP. We make no matching contributions under the DDCP. Our liability under the DDCP at December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $2,845 and 2018 was $2,080 and $1,079, respectively.

Note 1615 - Segment Information

We report based on 2 operating segments:

Traditional, which consists of credit products (including advances, standby letters of credit, and lines of credit), investments (including federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, interest-bearing demand deposit accounts, and investment securities), and correspondent services and deposits; and
Mortgage loans, which consists of mortgage loans purchased from our members through our MPP and participating interests purchased in 2012 - 2014 from the FHLBank of Topeka in mortgage loans that were originated by certain of its PFIs under the MPF Program.

These segments reflect our two primary mission asset activities and the manner in which they are managed from the perspective of development, resource allocation, product delivery, pricing, credit risk and operational administration. The segments identify the principal ways we provide services to members.

We measure the performance of each segment based upon the net interest spread of the underlying portfolio(s). Therefore, each segment's performance begins with net interest income.

Traditional net interest income is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the interest income earned on advances and investments and the borrowing costs related to those assets, net interest settlements and changes in fair value related to certain interest-rate swaps, and related premium and discount amortization. Traditional also includes the costs related to holding deposits for members and other miscellaneous borrowings. Mortgage loan net interest income is derived primarily from the difference, or spread, between the interest income earned on mortgage loans, including the premium and discount amortization, and the borrowing costs related to those loans.


135
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Direct other income and expense also affect each segment's results. The traditional segment includes the direct earnings impact of certain derivatives and hedging activities related to advances, investments and consolidated obligations as well as all other miscellaneous income and expense not associated with mortgage loans. The mortgage loans segment includes the direct earnings impact of derivatives and hedging activities as well as direct compensation, benefits and other expenses (including an allocation for indirect overhead) associated with operating the MPP and MPF Program and volume-driven costs associated with master servicing and quality control fees.

NetAs a result of hedge accounting guidance effective January 1, 2019, net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness previously presented in other income is presented in net interest income for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. Amounts for the year ended December 31, 2019. Prior period amounts2018 have not been reclassified. For more information, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.

The assessments related to AHP have been allocated to each segment based upon its proportionate share of income before assessments.


148
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents our financial performance by operating segment.
Year Ended December 31, 2019TraditionalMortgage LoansTotal
Net interest income$181,367  $55,875  $237,242  
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses—  (289) (289) 
Other income (loss)20,166  143  20,309  
Other expenses84,638  14,356  98,994  
Income before assessments116,895  41,951  158,846  
Affordable Housing Program assessments12,876  4,195  17,071  
Net income$104,019  $37,756  $141,775  
Year Ended December 31, 2018TraditionalMortgage LoansTotal
Net interest income$220,886  $67,201  $288,087  
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses—  (231) (231) 
Other income (loss)22,253  (1,744) 20,509  
Other expenses77,526  13,995  91,521  
Income before assessments165,613  51,693  217,306  
Affordable Housing Program assessments17,401  5,169  22,570  
Net income$148,212  $46,524  $194,736  
Year Ended December 31, 2017Traditional  Mortgage Loans  Total  
Net interest income$193,278  $69,725  $263,003  
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses—  51  51  
Other income (loss)(5,110) (886) (5,996) 
Other expenses69,644  12,718  82,362  
Income before assessments118,524  56,070  174,594  
Affordable Housing Program assessments12,556  5,607  18,163  
Net income$105,968  $50,463  $156,431  

Year Ended December 31, 2020TraditionalMortgage LoansTotal
Net interest income$253,683 $9,687 $263,370 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses140 140 
Other income (loss)(52,262)(3,254)(55,516)
Other expenses92,953 16,181 109,134 
Income before assessments108,468 (9,888)98,580 
Affordable Housing Program assessments11,706 (989)10,717 
Net income (loss)$96,762 $(8,899)$87,863 
Year Ended December 31, 2019
Net interest income$181,367 $55,875 $237,242 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses(289)(289)
Other income (loss)20,166 143 20,309 
Other expenses84,638 14,356 98,994 
Income before assessments116,895 41,951 158,846 
Affordable Housing Program assessments12,876 4,195 17,071 
Net income$104,019 $37,756 $141,775 
Year Ended December 31, 2018
Net interest income$220,886 $67,201 $288,087 
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses(231)(231)
Other income (loss)22,253 (1,744)20,509 
Other expenses77,526 13,995 91,521 
Income before assessments165,613 51,693 217,306 
Affordable Housing Program assessments17,401 5,169 22,570 
Net income$148,212 $46,524 $194,736 

We have not symmetrically allocated assets to each segment based upon financial results as it is impracticable to measure the performance of our segments from a total assets perspective. As a result, there is asymmetrical information presented in the tables above including, among other items, the allocation of depreciation without an allocation of the depreciable assets, derivatives and hedging earnings adjustments with no corresponding allocation to derivative assets, if any, and the recording of interest income with no allocation to accrued interest receivable.

The following table presents asset balances by operating segment.
By DateTraditionalMortgage LoansTotal
December 31, 2020$57,409,111 $8,515,645 $65,924,756 
December 31, 201956,695,738 10,815,037 67,510,775 

136149
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents asset balances by operating segment.
By DateTraditionalMortgage LoansTotal
December 31, 2019$56,695,738  $10,815,037  $67,510,775  
December 31, 201854,026,721  11,384,978  65,411,699  

Note 1716 - Estimated Fair Values

We estimate fair value amounts by using available market and other pertinent information and the most appropriate valuation methods. Although we use our best judgment in estimating the fair values of financial instruments, there are inherent limitations in any valuation technique. Therefore, these estimated fair values may not be indicative of the amounts that would have been realized in market transactions at the reporting dates.

Certain estimates of the fair value of financial assets and liabilities are highly subjective and require judgments regarding significant factors such as the amount and timing of future cash flows, prepayment speeds, interest-rate volatility, and the discount rates that appropriately reflect market and credit risks. The use of different assumptions could have a material effect on the fair value estimates.

Fair Value HierarchyGAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy and requires us to maximize the use of significant observable inputs and minimize the use of significant unobservable inputs when measuring estimated fair value. The inputs are evaluated, and an overall level for the estimated fair value measurement is determined. This overall level is an indication of the extent of the market observability of the estimated fair value measurement for the asset or liability.

The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value into three broad levels:

Level 1 Inputs. Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in an active market that we can access on the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which the transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 Inputs. Inputs other than quoted prices within level 1 that are observable inputs for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. If the asset or liability has a specified or contractual term, a level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term of the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include (i) quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; (ii) quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active; (iii) inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals and implied volatilities); and (iv) inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.

Level 3 Inputs. Unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.

We review the fair value hierarchy classifications on a quarterly basis. Changes in the observability of the inputs may result in a reclassification of certain assets or liabilities. Such reclassifications are reported as transfers in/out at estimated fair value as of the beginning of the quarter in which the changes occur. There were no such reclassifications during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, 2018, or 2017.2018.

137150
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following tables present the carrying value and estimated fair value of each of our financial instruments. The total of the estimated fair values does not represent an estimate of our overall market value as a going concern, which would take into account, among other considerations, future business opportunities and the net profitability of assets and liabilities.
December 31, 2019
Estimated Fair Value
 CarryingNetting
Financial InstrumentsValueTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
Assets:
Cash and due from banks$220,294  $220,294  $220,294  $—  $—  $—  
Interest-bearing deposits809,141  809,141  809,000  141  —  —  
Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,500,000  1,500,000  —  1,500,000  —  —  
Federal funds sold2,550,000  2,550,000  —  2,550,000  —  —  
Trading securities5,016,649  5,016,649  —  5,016,649  —  —  
AFS securities8,484,478  8,484,478  —  8,484,478  —  —  
HTM securities5,216,401  5,216,206  —  5,216,206  —  —  
Advances32,480,108  32,425,749  —  32,425,749  —  —  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net10,815,037  10,943,595  —  10,935,787  7,808  —  
Accrued interest receivable131,822  131,822  —  131,822  —  —  
Derivative assets, net208,008  208,008  —  60,941  —  147,067  
Grantor trust assets (2)
26,050  26,050  26,050  —  —  —  
Liabilities:
Deposits960,304  960,304  —  960,304  —  —  
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes17,676,793  17,679,210  —  17,679,210  —  —  
Bonds44,715,224  45,036,500  —  45,036,500  —  —  
Accrued interest payable178,981  178,981  —  178,981  —  —  
Derivative liabilities, net3,206  3,206  —  319,061  —  (315,855) 
MRCS322,902  322,902  322,902  —  —  —  

December 31, 2020
Estimated Fair Value
 CarryingNetting
Financial InstrumentsValueTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
Assets:
Cash and due from banks$1,811,544 $1,811,544 $1,811,544 $$$— 
Interest-bearing deposits100,026 100,026 100,000 26 — 
Securities purchased under agreements to resell2,500,000 2,500,000 2,500,000 — 
Federal funds sold1,215,000 1,215,000 1,215,000 — 
Trading securities5,094,703 5,094,703 5,094,703 — 
AFS securities10,144,899 10,144,899 10,144,899 — 
HTM securities4,701,302 4,723,796 4,723,796 — 
Advances31,347,486 31,290,664 31,290,664 — 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net8,515,645 8,922,185 8,860,853 61,332 — 
Accrued interest receivable103,076 103,076 103,076 — 
Derivative assets, net283,082 283,082 20,557 262,525 
Grantor trust assets (2)
51,032 51,032 51,032 — 
Liabilities:
Deposits1,375,206 1,375,206 1,375,206 — 
Consolidated obligations:
Discount notes16,617,079 16,617,976 16,617,976 — 
Bonds43,332,946 43,952,206 43,952,206 — 
Accrued interest payable63,581 63,581 63,581 — 
Derivative liabilities, net22,979 22,979 762,997 (740,018)
MRCS250,768 250,768 250,768 — 

138151
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

December 31, 2018December 31, 2019
Estimated Fair ValueEstimated Fair Value
CarryingNetting CarryingNetting
Financial InstrumentsFinancial InstrumentsValueTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
Financial InstrumentsValueTotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
Assets:Assets:Assets:
Cash and due from banksCash and due from banks$100,735  $100,735  $100,735  $—  $—  $—  Cash and due from banks$220,294 $220,294 $220,294 $$$— 
Interest-bearing depositsInterest-bearing deposits1,210,705  1,210,705  1,210,039  666  —  —  Interest-bearing deposits809,141 809,141 809,000 141 — 
Securities purchased under agreements to resellSecurities purchased under agreements to resell3,212,726  3,212,728  —  3,212,728  —  —  Securities purchased under agreements to resell1,500,000 1,500,000 1,500,000 — 
Federal funds soldFederal funds sold3,085,000  3,085,000  —  3,085,000  —  —  Federal funds sold2,550,000 2,550,000 2,550,000 — 
Trading securitiesTrading securities5,016,649 5,016,649 5,016,649 — 
AFS securitiesAFS securities7,703,596  7,703,596  —  7,703,596  —  —  AFS securities8,484,478 8,484,478 8,484,478 — 
HTM securitiesHTM securities5,673,720  5,676,145  —  5,676,145  —  —  HTM securities5,216,401 5,216,206 5,216,206 — 
AdvancesAdvances32,727,668  32,669,145  —  32,669,145  —  —  Advances32,480,108 32,425,749 32,425,749 — 
Mortgage loans held for portfolio, netMortgage loans held for portfolio, net11,384,978  11,212,978  —  11,202,984  9,994  —  Mortgage loans held for portfolio, net10,815,037 10,943,595 10,935,787 7,808 — 
Accrued interest receivableAccrued interest receivable124,611  124,611  —  124,611  —  —  Accrued interest receivable131,822 131,822 131,822 — 
Derivative assets, netDerivative assets, net116,764  116,764  —  176,802  —  (60,038) Derivative assets, net208,008 208,008 60,941 147,067 
Grantor trust assets (2)
Grantor trust assets (2)
21,122  21,122  21,122  —  —  —  
Grantor trust assets (2)
26,050 26,050 26,050 — 
Liabilities:Liabilities:Liabilities:
DepositsDeposits500,440  500,440  —  500,440  —  —  Deposits960,304 960,304 960,304 — 
Consolidated obligations:Consolidated obligations:Consolidated obligations:
Discount notesDiscount notes20,895,262  20,895,446  —  20,895,446  —  —  Discount notes17,676,793 17,679,210 17,679,210 — 
BondsBonds40,265,465  40,137,791  —  40,137,791  —  —  Bonds44,715,224 45,036,500 45,036,500 — 
Accrued interest payableAccrued interest payable179,728  179,728  —  179,728  —  —  Accrued interest payable178,981 178,981 178,981 — 
Derivative liabilities, netDerivative liabilities, net21,067  21,067  —  123,662  —  (102,595) Derivative liabilities, net3,206 3,206 319,061 (315,855)
MRCSMRCS168,876  168,876  168,876  —  —  —  MRCS322,902 322,902 322,902 — 

(1)    Represents the application of the netting requirements that allow the settlement ofus to settle (i) positive and negative positions and (ii) cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty.
(2)    Included in other assets on the statement of condition.

Summary of Valuation Techniques and Significant Inputs.The valuation techniques and significant inputs used to develop our measurement of estimated fair value for assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis in the Statement Condition are listed below.

Investment Securities - MBS. The estimated fair value incorporates prices from multiple third-party pricing vendors, when available. These pricing vendors use various proprietary models to price MBS. The inputs to those models are derived from various sources, including, but not limited to, benchmark yields, reported trades, dealer estimates, issuer spreads, benchmark securities, bids, offers, and other market-related data.

We conduct reviews of the pricing vendors' processes, methodologies and control procedures to confirm and further augment our understanding of the vendors' prices for our MBS. Each pricing vendor has an established challenge process in place for all MBS valuations, which facilitates resolution of potentially erroneous prices identified by us.

Our valuation technique for estimating the fair values of MBS initially requires the establishment of a "median" price for each security. All prices that are within a specified tolerance threshold of the median price are then included in the "cluster" of prices that are averaged to compute a "default" price. All prices that are outside the threshold (i.e., outliers) are subject to further analysis (including, but not limited to, comparison to prices provided by an additional third-party valuation service, prices for similar securities, and/or non-binding dealer estimates) to determine if an outlier is a better estimate of fair value. If so, then the outlier (or the other price as appropriate) is used as the final price rather than the default price. In all cases, the final price is used to determine the estimated fair value of the security.

As of December 31, 2019, two or three prices were received for substantially all of our MBS.

139152
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

As of December 31, 2020, we obtained 2 or 3 prices for substantially all of our MBS.

Investment Securities - non-MBS. The estimated fair value is determined using market-observable price quotes from third-party pricing vendors, such as the Composite Bloomberg Bond Trader screen, thus falling under the market approach. 

Impaired Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio. We record non-recurring fair value adjustments to reflect partial charge-offs on
impaired mortgage loans. We estimate the fair value of these assets using a current property value obtained from a third-party.

Derivative assets/liabilities. We base the estimated fair values of derivatives with similar terms on market prices when available. However, active markets do not exist for many of our derivatives. Consequently, fair values for these instruments are generally estimated using standard valuation techniques such as discounted cash-flow analysis and comparisons to similar instruments. In limited instances, fair value estimates for derivatives are obtained from dealers and are corroborated by using a pricing model and observable market data (e.g., the LIBOR or OIS curves).

A discounted cash flow analysis utilizes market-observable inputs (inputs that are actively quoted and can be validated to external sources). Inputs by class of derivative are as follows:

Interest-rate related:
LIBOR curve or the OIS curve, as applicable, to project cash flows for collateralized interest-rate swaps and the OIS curve only to discount;discount those cash flows; and
Volatility assumption - market-based expectations of future interest-rate volatility implied from current market prices for similar options.

TBAs:
TBA securities prices - market-based prices are determined by coupon, maturity and expected term until settlement.

MDCs:
TBA securities prices - prices are then adjusted for differences in coupon, average loan rate and seasoning.

The estimated fair values of our derivative assets and liabilities include accrued interest receivable/payable and related cash collateral. The estimated fair values of the accrued interest receivable/payable and cash collateral equal their carrying values due to their short-term nature.

We adjust the estimated fair values of our derivatives for counterparty nonperformance risk, particularly credit risk, as appropriate. We compute our nonperformance risk adjustment by using observable credit default swap spreads and estimated probability default rates applied to our exposure after considering collateral held or placed.

Grantor Trust Assets. Grantor trust assets, included as a component of other assets, are carried at estimated fair value based on quoted market prices as of the last business day of the reporting period.




140153
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Estimated Fair Value Measurements. The following tables present, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the estimated fair value of our financial assets and liabilities that are recorded at estimated fair value on a recurring or non-recurring basis on our statement of condition.
 Netting Netting
December 31, 2019TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
December 31, 2020December 31, 2020TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
Trading securities:Trading securities:Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury obligations$5,016,649  $—  $5,016,649  $—  $—  
U.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. Treasury securities$5,094,703 $$5,094,703 $$— 
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities5,016,649  —  5,016,649  —  —  Total trading securities5,094,703 5,094,703 — 
AFS securities:AFS securities:AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debenturesGSE and TVA debentures3,926,852  —  3,926,852  —  —  GSE and TVA debentures3,503,137 3,503,137 — 
GSE MBSGSE MBS4,557,626  —  4,557,626  —  —  GSE MBS6,641,762 6,641,762 — 
Total AFS securitiesTotal AFS securities8,484,478  —  8,484,478  —  —  Total AFS securities10,144,899 10,144,899 — 
Derivative assets:Derivative assets:     Derivative assets: 
Interest-rate relatedInterest-rate related207,903  —  60,836  —  147,067  Interest-rate related282,060 19,535 262,525 
Interest-rate forwards—  —  —  —  —  
MDCsMDCs105  —  105  —  —  MDCs1,022 1,022 
Total derivative assets, netTotal derivative assets, net208,008  —  60,941  —  147,067  Total derivative assets, net283,082 20,557 262,525 
Grantor trust assets (2)
26,050  26,050  —  —  —  
Other assets:Other assets:
Grantor trust assetsGrantor trust assets51,032 51,032 — 
Total assets at recurring estimated fair valueTotal assets at recurring estimated fair value$13,735,185  $26,050  $13,562,068  $—  $147,067  Total assets at recurring estimated fair value$15,573,716 $51,032 $15,260,159 $$262,525 
Derivative liabilities:Derivative liabilities:               Derivative liabilities: 
Interest-rate relatedInterest-rate related$2,987  $—  $318,842  $—  $(315,855) Interest-rate related$22,979 $$762,997 $$(740,018)
Interest-rate forwards216  —  216  —  —  
MDCsMDCs —   —  —  MDCs
Total derivative liabilities, netTotal derivative liabilities, net3,206  —  319,061  —  (315,855) Total derivative liabilities, net22,979 762,997 (740,018)
Total liabilities at recurring estimated fair valueTotal liabilities at recurring estimated fair value$3,206  $—  $319,061  $—  $(315,855) Total liabilities at recurring estimated fair value$22,979 $$762,997 $$(740,018)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (3)
$1,504  $—  $—  $1,504  $—  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (2)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (2)
$1,460 $$$1,460 $— 
Total assets at non-recurring estimated fair valueTotal assets at non-recurring estimated fair value$1,504  $—  $—  $1,504  $—  Total assets at non-recurring estimated fair value$1,460 $$$1,460 $— 

141154
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

NettingNetting
December 31, 2018TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
December 31, 2019December 31, 2019TotalLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Adjustments (1)
Trading securities:Trading securities:
U.S. Treasury securitiesU.S. Treasury securities$5,016,649 $$5,016,649 $$— 
Total trading securitiesTotal trading securities5,016,649 5,016,649 — 
AFS securities:AFS securities:AFS securities:
GSE and TVA debenturesGSE and TVA debentures$4,277,080  $—  $4,277,080  $—  $—  GSE and TVA debentures3,926,852 3,926,852 — 
GSE MBSGSE MBS3,426,516  —  3,426,516  —  —  GSE MBS4,557,626 4,557,626 — 
Total AFS securitiesTotal AFS securities7,703,596  —  7,703,596  —  —  Total AFS securities8,484,478 8,484,478 — 
Derivative assets:Derivative assets:     Derivative assets:     
Interest-rate relatedInterest-rate related116,618  —  176,656  —  (60,038) Interest-rate related207,903 60,836 147,067 
MDCsMDCs146  —  146  —  —  MDCs105 105 
Total derivative assets, netTotal derivative assets, net116,764  —  176,802  —  (60,038) Total derivative assets, net208,008 60,941 147,067 
Grantor trust assets (2)
21,122  21,122  —  —  —  
Other assets:Other assets:
Grantor trust assetsGrantor trust assets26,050 26,050 — 
Total assets at recurring estimated fair valueTotal assets at recurring estimated fair value$7,841,482  $21,122  $7,880,398  $—  $(60,038) Total assets at recurring estimated fair value$13,735,185 $26,050 $13,562,068 $$147,067 
Derivative liabilities:Derivative liabilities:               Derivative liabilities:     
Interest-rate relatedInterest-rate related$20,842  $—  $123,437  $—  $(102,595) Interest-rate related$3,203 $$319,058 $$(315,855)
Interest-rate forwards202  —  202  —  —  
MDCsMDCs23  —  23  —  —  MDCs
Total derivative liabilities, netTotal derivative liabilities, net21,067  —  123,662  —  (102,595) Total derivative liabilities, net3,206 319,061 (315,855)
Total liabilities at recurring estimated fair valueTotal liabilities at recurring estimated fair value$21,067  $—  $123,662  $—  $(102,595) Total liabilities at recurring estimated fair value$3,206 $$319,061 $$(315,855)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (4)
$1,734  $—  $—  $1,734  $—  
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (3)
Mortgage loans held for portfolio (3)
$1,504 $$$1,504 $— 
Total assets at non-recurring estimated fair valueTotal assets at non-recurring estimated fair value$1,734  $—  $—  $1,734  $—  Total assets at non-recurring estimated fair value$1,504 $$$1,504 $— 

(1)Represents the application of the netting requirements that allow us to settle (i) positive and negative positions and (ii) cash collateral and related accrued interest held or placed with the same clearing agent and/or counterparty.
(2)    Included in other assets.Amounts are as of the date the fair-value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2020.
(3)    Amounts are as of the date the fair-value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2019.
(4) Amounts are as of the date the fair-value adjustment was recorded during the year ended December 31, 2018.

142155
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Level 3 Disclosures for All Assets and Liabilities that are Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis. The table below presents a rollforward of our AFS private-label RMBS measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using level 3 significant inputs. The estimated fair values were determined using a pricing source, such as a dealer quote or comparable
security price, for which the significant inputs used to determine the price were not readily observable. During the year ended December 31, 2018, for strategic, economic and operational reasons, we sold all of our AFS investments in private-label RMBS.

AFS private-label RMBS Level 3 Rollforward20182017
Balance, beginning of year$218,534  $269,119  
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities32,407  —  
Accretion of credit losses in interest income1,884  6,778  
Net losses on changes in fair value in other income—  (166) 
Net change in fair value not in excess of cumulative non-credit losses in OCI2,693  29  
Unrealized gains in OCI392  2,189  
Reclassification of non-credit portion in OCI to other income—  166  
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
Sales(236,248) —  
Settlements(19,662) (59,581) 
Balance, end of year$—  $218,534  
Net gains included in earnings attributable to changes in fair value relating to assets still held at end of year$—  $6,612  
AFS private-label RMBS Level 3 Rollforward2018
Balance, beginning of year$218,534 
Total realized and unrealized gains (losses):
Net realized gains from sale of AFS securities32,407 
Accretion of credit losses in interest income1,884 
Net losses on changes in fair value in other income
Net change in fair value not in excess of cumulative non-credit losses in OCI2,693 
Unrealized gains in OCI392 
Reclassification of non-credit portion in OCI to other income
Purchases, issuances, sales and settlements:
Sales(236,248)
Settlements(19,662)
Balance, end of year$
Net gains included in earnings attributable to changes in fair value relating to assets still held at end of year$

Note 1817 - Commitments and Contingencies

The following table presents our off-balance-sheet commitments at their notional amounts.
December 31, 2019
Type of CommitmentExpire within one yearExpire after one yearTotal
Letters of credit outstanding
$323,619  $125,717  $449,336  
Unused lines of credit (1)
1,011,934  —  1,011,934  
Commitments to fund additional advances (2)
5,000  —  5,000  
Commitments to fund or purchase mortgage loans, net (3)
70,693  —  70,693  
Unsettled discount notes, at par400,000  —  400,000  

December 31, 2020
Type of CommitmentExpire within one yearExpire after one yearTotal
Standby letters of credit outstanding
$190,786 $165,441 $356,227 
Unused lines of credit (1)
997,608 997,608 
Commitments to fund or purchase mortgage loans, net (2)
180,152 180,152 
Unsettled CO bonds, at par150,000 150,000 
Unsettled discount notes, at par250,000 250,000 

(1)     Maximum line of credit amount for anyper member is $50,000.
(2)    Generally for periods up to six months.
(3)  Generally for periods up to 91 days.

Commitments to Extend Credit. A standby letter of credit is a financing arrangement between us and one of our members for which we charge the member a commitment fee. If we are required to make a payment for a beneficiary's draw, the payment amount is converted into a collateralized advance to the member. Substantially all of these standby letters of credit, including related commitments, range from 3 months to 20 years, although some are renewable at our option. The carrying value of guarantees (commitment fees) related to standby letters of credit is recorded in other liabilities and totaled $2,915$5,082 at December 31, 2019.2020.

Lines of credit allow members to fund short-term cash needs (up to one year year)) without submitting a new application for each request for funds.

143156
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

We monitor the creditworthiness of our standby letters of credit and lines of credit based on an evaluation of the financial condition of our members. In addition, commitments to extend credit are fully collateralized at the time of issuance. We have established parameters for the measurement, review, classification, and monitoring of credit risk related to these two products. Based on credit analyses performed by us as well as collateral requirements, we have not deemed it necessary to record any additional liability for these commitments. For more information, see Note 7 - Allowance for Credit Losses.

Commitments to Fund or Purchase Mortgage Loans. Commitments that unconditionally obligate us to fund or purchase mortgage loans are generally for periods not to exceed 91 days. Such commitments are reported as derivative assets or derivative liabilities at their estimated fair value and are reported net of participating interests sold to other FHLBanks.

Pledged Collateral. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, we had pledged cash collateral at par, of $463,780$1,003,380 and $127,942,$463,780, respectively, to counterparties and clearing agents. At December 31, 20192020 and 2018,2019, we had not pledged any securities as collateral.

Liability for Credit Losses. We monitor the creditworthiness of our members that have standby letters of credit and lines of credit. As standby letters of credit and lines of credit are subject to the same collateralization and borrowing limits that apply to advances and are fully collateralized at the time of issuance, we have not recorded a liability for credit losses on these credit products.

Legal Proceedings. We are subject to legal proceedings arising in the normal course of business. We record an accrual for a loss contingency when it is probable that a loss for which we could be liable has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. After consultation with legal counsel, management does not anticipate that the ultimate liability, if any, arising out of these proceedings could have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

In 2010, we filed a complaint asserting claims against several entities for negligent misrepresentation and violations of state and federal securities law occurring in connection with the sale of private-label RMBS to us. In 2013, 2014 and 2015, we executed confidential settlement agreements with certain defendants in this litigation, pursuant to which we dismissed pending claims against, and provided legal releases to, certain entities with respect to all applicable securities at issue in the litigation, in consideration of our receipt of cash payments from or on behalf of those defendants. We had previously dismissed all the complaint as to the other named defendants. As a result, all proceedings in the RMBS litigation we filed have been concluded. Cash settlement payments, net of legal fees and litigation expenses, totaled $91, $407, and $530 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, and were recorded in other income.

Additional discussion of other commitments and contingencies is provided in Note 5 - Advances; Note 6 - Mortgage Loans Held for Portfolio; Note 98 - Derivatives and Hedging Activities; Note 1110 - Consolidated Obligations; Note 1312 - Capital; and Note 1716 - Estimated Fair Values.

144
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Note 1918 - Related Party and Other Transactions

Transactions with Related Parties. We are a cooperative whose members and former members (or legal successors) own all of our outstanding capital stock. Former members (including certain non-members) are required to maintain their investment in our capital stock until their outstanding business transactions with us have matured or are paid off and their capital stock is redeemed in accordance with our capital plan and regulatory requirements. For more information, see Note 1312 - Capital.

Under GAAP, transactions with related parties include transactions with principal owners, i.e, owners of more than 10% of the voting interests of the entity. Due to the statutory limits on members' voting rights and the number of members in our Bank, no shareholder owned more than 10 percent of the total voting interests as of and for the three-year period ended December 31, 2019.2020. Therefore, the Bank had no transactions with principal owners for any of the periods presented.

Under GAAP, transactions with related parties also include transactions with management. Management is defined as persons who are responsible for achieving the objectives of the entity and who have the authority to establish policies and make decisions by which those objectives are to be pursued. For this purpose, management typically includes those who serve on our board of directors. The Bank provides, in the ordinary course of its business, products and services to members whose officers or directors may also serve as directors of the Bank, i.e., directors' financial institutions. However, Finance Agency regulations require that transactions with directors' financial institutions be made on the same terms as those with any other member. Therefore, all of our transactions with directors' financial institutions are subject to the same eligibility and credit criteria, as well as the same conditions, as comparable transactions with all other members.


157
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

The following table presents the aggregate outstanding balances of capital stock and advances outstanding for directors' financial institutions and their balances as a percent of the total balances on our statement of condition.
December 31, 2019December 31, 2018
Balances with Directors' Financial InstitutionsPar value% of TotalPar value% of Total
Capital stock$57,133  %$43,315  %
Advances698,699  %600,869  %

December 31, 2020December 31, 2019
Balances with Directors' Financial InstitutionsPar value% of TotalPar value% of Total
Capital stock$426,003 17 %$57,133 %
Advances5,397,433 18 %698,699 %

The par values at December 31, 20192020 reflect changes in the composition of directors' financial institutions effective January 1, 2019,2020, due to changes in board membership resulting from the 20182019 director election, and a change in a director's affiliation.

election.
The following table presents our transactions with directors' financial institutions, taking into account the beginning and ending dates of the directors' terms, merger activity and other changes in the composition of directors' financial institutions.
Years Ended December 31,
Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions201920182017
Net capital stock issuances (redemptions and repurchases)$6,729  $6,328  $3,912  
Net advances (repayments)203,078  23,550  79,751  
Mortgage loan purchases30,610  40,038  33,274  

Years Ended December 31,
Transactions with Directors' Financial Institutions202020192018
Net capital stock issuances (redemptions and repurchases)$80,088 $6,729 $6,328 
Net advances (repayments)346,863 203,078 23,550 
Mortgage loan purchases48,394 30,610 40,038 

145
Table of Contents



Notes to Financial Statements, continued
($ amounts in thousands unless otherwise indicated)

Transactions with Members and Former Members. Substantially all advances are made to members, and all whole mortgage loans held for portfolio are purchased from members. We also maintain demand deposit accounts for members, primarily to facilitate settlement activities that are directly related to advances or mortgage loan purchases. Such transactions with members are entered into in the ordinary course of business. In addition, we may purchase investments in federal funds sold, securities purchased under agreements to resell, certificates of deposit, and MBS from members or their affiliates. All purchases are transacted at market prices without preference to the status of the counterparty or the issuer of the security as a member, nonmember, or affiliate thereof.

Under our AHP, we provide subsidies to members, which may be in the form of direct grants or below-market-rate advances. All AHP subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business. Under our Community Investment Program and our Community Investment Cash Advances program, we provide subsidies in the form of below-market-rate advances to members or standby letters of credit to members for community lending and economic development projects. All Community Investment Cash Advances subsidies are made in the ordinary course of business.

Transactions with Other FHLBanks. Occasionally, we loan or borrow short-term funds to/from other FHLBanks. The following table presents the loans to/borrowings from other FHLBanks.
Years Ended December 31,  
Loans to other FHLBanks201920182017
Disbursements$—  $(400,000) $(100,000) 
Principal repayments—  400,000  100,000  
Borrowings from other FHLBanks
Proceeds from borrowings$250,000  $—  $—  
Principal repayments(250,000) —  —  

Years Ended December 31,
Loans to other FHLBanks202020192018
Disbursements$(90,000)$$(400,000)
Principal repayments90,000 400,000 
Borrowings from other FHLBanks
Proceeds from borrowings$$250,000 $
Principal repayments(250,000)

There were no0 loans to or borrowings from other FHLBanks that remained outstanding at December 31, 20192020 or 2018.2019.

Transactions with the Office of Finance. Our proportionate share of the cost of operating the Office of Finance is identified in our statement of income.
146158
Table of Contents


DEFINED TERMS

2005 SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, as amended
ABS: Asset-Backed Securities
Advance: Secured loan to members, former members or Housing Associates
AFS: Available-for-Sale
Agency: GSE and Ginnie Mae
AHP: Affordable Housing Program
AMA: Acquired Member Assets
AOCI: Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Bank Act: Federal Home Loan Bank Act of 1932, as amended
bps: basis points
CARES Act: Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act
CDFI: Community Development Financial Institution
CE: Credit Enhancement
CFI: Community Financial Institution, an FDIC-insured depository institution with average total assets below an annually- adjusted limit established by the Finance Agency Director based on the Consumer Price Index
CFPB: Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection
CFTC: United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission
Clearinghouse: A United States Commodity Futures Trading Commission-registered derivatives clearing organization
CME: CME Clearing
CMO: Collateralized Mortgage Obligation
CO bond: Consolidated Obligation bond
COVID-19: Coronavirus Disease 2019
DB Plan: Pentegra Defined Benefit Pension Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended
DC Plan: Collectively, the Pentegra Defined Contribution Retirement Savings Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended, in effect through October 1, 2020 and the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Retirement Savings Plan, commencing October 2, 2020
DDCP:Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan
Dodd-Frank Act: Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, as amended
EFFR: Effective Federal Funds Rate
Exchange Act: Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
Fannie Mae: Federal National Mortgage Association
FASB: Financial Accounting Standards Board
FCA: Financial Conduct Authority
FDIC: Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHA: Federal Housing Administration
FHLBank: A Federal Home Loan Bank
FHLBanks: The 11 Federal Home Loan Banks or a subset thereof
FHLBank System: The 11 Federal Home Loan Banks and the Office of Finance
FICO®: Fair Isaac Corporation, the creators of the FICO credit score
Final Membership Rule: Final Rule on FHLBank Membership issued by the Federal Housing Finance Agency effective February 19, 2016
Finance Agency: Federal Housing Finance Agency, successor to Finance Board
Finance Board: Federal Housing Finance Board, predecessor to Finance Agency
FLA: First Loss Account
FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee
Form 8-K: Current Report on Form 8-K as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
Form 10-K: Annual Report on Form 10-K as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
Form 10-Q: Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q as filed with the SEC under the Exchange Act
FRB: Federal Reserve Board
Freddie Mac: Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation
Frozen SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan, frozen effective December 31, 2004
GAAP: Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America
Ginnie Mae: Government National Mortgage Association
GLB Act: Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999, as amended
GSE: United States Government-Sponsored Enterprise
HERA: Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, as amended
Housing Associate: Approved lender under Title II of the National Housing Act of 1934 that is either a government agency or is chartered under federal or state law with rights and powers similar to those of a corporation
159
Table of Contents


HTM: Held-to-Maturity
HUD: United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
JCE Agreement: Joint Capital Enhancement Agreement, as amended, among the 11 FHLBanks
KESP: Key Employee Severance Policy
LCH: LCH.Clearnet LLC
LIBOR: London Interbank Offered Rate
LRA: Lender Risk Account
147
Table of Contents


LTV: Loan-to-Value
MAP-21: Moving Ahead for Progress in the 21st Century Act, enacted on July 6, 2012
MBS: Mortgage-Backed Securities
MCC: Master Commitment Contract
MDC: Mandatory Delivery Commitment
Moody's: Moody's Investor Services
MPF: Mortgage Partnership Finance®
MPP: Mortgage Purchase Program, including Original and Advantage unless indicated otherwise
MRCS: Mandatorily Redeemable Capital Stock
MVE: Market Value of Equity
NRSRO: Nationally Recognized Statistical Rating Organization
OCC: Office of the Comptroller of the Currency
OCI: Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
OIS: Overnight-Indexed Swap
ORERC: Other Real Estate-Related Collateral
OTTI: Other-Than-Temporary Impairment or -Temporarily Impaired (as the context indicates)
PFI: Participating Financial Institution
PMI: Primary Mortgage Insurance
REMIC:Real Estate Mortgage Investment Conduit
REO: Real Estate Owned
RMBS: Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
S&P: Standard & Poor's Rating Service
Safety and Soundness Act: Federal Housing Enterprises Financial Safety and Soundness Act of 1992, as amended
SBA: Small Business Administration
SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Act: Securities Act of 1933, as amended
SERP: Federal Home Loan Bank of IndianapolisCollectively, the 2005 Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan and/or a similar frozen planSERP and the Frozen SERP
SETP: Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis 2016 Supplemental Executive Thrift Plan, as amended and restated
SMI: Supplemental Mortgage Insurance
SOFR: Secured Overnight Financing Rate
TBA: To Be Announced, a forward contract for the purchase or sale of MBS at a future agreed-upon date for an established price
TDR: Troubled Debt Restructuring
TVA: Tennessee Valley Authority
UPB: Unpaid Principal Balance
VaR: Value at Risk
WAIR: Weighted-Average Interest Rate
148160
Table of Contents


Supplementary Data

Supplementary unaudited financial data for each full quarter within the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 are included in the tables below ($ amounts in millions).
1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th Quarter20191st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th Quarter2020
Statement of Income Statement of Income  2019201920192019TotalStatement of Income2020202020202020Total
Interest incomeInterest income$446  $474  $439  $394  $1,753  Interest income$365 $195 $151 $142 $853 
Interest expenseInterest expense388  414  389  324  1,515  Interest expense302 128 90 70 590 
Net interest incomeNet interest income58  60  50  70  238  Net interest income63 67 61 72 263 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses—  —  —  —  —  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— — — — — 
Net interest income after provision for credit lossesNet interest income after provision for credit losses58  60  50  70  238  Net interest income after provision for credit losses63 67 61 72 263 
Other income (loss)Other income (loss)   11  20  Other income (loss)(4)(25)(17)(9)(55)
Other expensesOther expenses23  24  24  28  99  Other expenses26 26 27 30 109 
Income before assessmentsIncome before assessments38  39  29  53  159  Income before assessments33 16 17 33 99 
AHP assessmentsAHP assessments    17  AHP assessments11 
Net incomeNet income$34  $35  $26  $47  $142  Net income$29 $14 $15 $30 $88 
1st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th Quarter20181st Quarter2nd Quarter3rd Quarter4th Quarter2019
Statement of Income Statement of Income  2018201820182018TotalStatement of Income2019201920192019Total
Interest incomeInterest income$323  $376  $420  $446  $1,565  Interest income$446 $474 $439 $394 $1,753 
Interest expenseInterest expense253  306  347  371  1,277  Interest expense388 414 389 324 1,515 
Net interest incomeNet interest income70  70  73  75  288  Net interest income58 60 50 70 238 
Provision for (reversal of) credit lossesProvision for (reversal of) credit losses—  —  —  —  —  Provision for (reversal of) credit losses— — — — — 
Net interest income after provision for credit lossesNet interest income after provision for credit losses70  70  73  75  288  Net interest income after provision for credit losses58 60 50 70 238 
Other income (loss)Other income (loss) 31  (7) (9) 21  Other income (loss)11 20 
Other expensesOther expenses22  24  23  23  92  Other expenses23 24 24 28 99 
Income before assessmentsIncome before assessments54  77  43  43  217  Income before assessments38 39 29 53 159 
AHP assessmentsAHP assessments    22  AHP assessments17 
Net incomeNet income$48  $69  $39  $39  $195  Net income$34 $35 $26 $47 $142 

Net gains (losses) related to fair-value hedge ineffectiveness previously presented in other income is presented in net interest income for the year ended December 31, 2019. Prior period amounts have not been reclassified. For more information, see Note 2 - Recently Adopted and Issued Accounting Guidance.


149161
Table of Contents


ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.
 
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
 
We are responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is: (a) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms; and (b) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our principal executive officer, principal financial officer, and principal accounting officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

As of December 31, 2019,2020, we conducted an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer) and Chief Accounting Officer (the principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 of the Exchange Act. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019.2020.
 
Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15(d)-15(f) of the Exchange Act, that occurred during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Limitations on the Effectiveness of Controls. We do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures and other internal controls will prevent all error and fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is also based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can only be reasonable assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Additionally, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.
150162
Table of Contents


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

Board of Directors

The Bank Act divides FHLBank directorships into two categories, "member" directorships and "independent" directorships. Both types of directorships are filled by a vote of the members. Elections for member directors are held on a state-by-state basis. Member directors are elected by a plurality vote of the members in their state. Independent directors are elected at-large by all the members in the FHLBank district without regard to the state. No member of management of an FHLBank may serve as a director of an FHLBank.

Under the Bank Act, member directorships must make up a majority of the board of directors' seats, while the independent directorships must comprise at least 40% of the entire board. A Finance Agency Order issued June 17, 201910, 2020 provides that we have 17 seats on our board of directors for 2020,2021, consisting of five Indiana member directors, four Michigan member directors, and eight independent directors. The term of office for directors is four years, unless otherwise adjusted by the Director in order to achieve an appropriate staggering of terms, with approximately one-fourth of the directors' terms expiring each year. Directors may not serve more than three consecutive full terms.

Finance Agency regulations permit, but do not require, the board of directors to conduct an annual assessment of the skills and experience possessed by the board as a whole and to determine whether the capabilities of the board would be enhanced through the addition of individuals with particular skills and experience. We may identify those qualifications and inform the voting members as part of our nomination and balloting process; however, by regulation as described below, we may not exclude a member director nominee from the election ballot on the basis of those qualifications. For the 20192020 director elections, our board listed in its request for nominations certain desirable candidate attributes and experiences, personal characteristics, and other competencies, but no particular qualifications beyond the eligibility criteria were required as part of the nomination, balloting and election process.

Finance Agency regulations require each FHLBank to develop, implement, and maintain policies and procedures to ensure, to the maximum extent possible in balance with financially safe and sound business practices, the consideration of minorities, women, and individuals with disabilities for employment, and consideration of minority-, women-, and disabled-owned businesses to be engaged for all business and activities. In particular, those policies and procedures shall (among other things) encourage the consideration of diversity in nominating or soliciting nominees for positions on our board of directors.

Nomination of Member Directors. The Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations require that member director nominees meet certain statutory and regulatory criteria in order to be eligible to be elected and serve as directors. To be eligible, an individual must: (i) be an officer or director of a member institution located in the state in which there is an open member director position; (ii) represent a member institution that is in compliance with the minimum capital requirements established by its regulator; and (iii) be a United States citizen. These criteria are the only eligibility and qualifications criteria that member directors must meet.

Each eligible institution may nominate representatives from member institutions in its state to serve as member directors. Only our shareholders may nominate and elect member directors. Our board of directors is not permitted to nominate or elect member directors, except to fill a vacancy for the remainder of an unexpired term or to fill a vacancy for which no nominations were received. With respect to member directors, no director, officer, employee, attorney or agent of our Bank (except in his or her personal capacity) may, directly or indirectly, support the nomination or election of a particular individual for a member directorship. Finance Agency regulations do not require member institutions to communicate the reasons for their nominations, and we have no power to require them to do so.

Nomination of Independent Directors. Independent director nominees also must meet certain statutory and regulatory eligibility criteria. Each independent director must be a United States citizen and a bona fide resident of Michigan or Indiana. Before nominating an individual for an independent directorship, other than for a public interest directorship, our board must determine that the nominee's knowledge or experience is commensurate with that needed to oversee a financial institution with a size and complexity that is comparable to that of our Bank. The Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations prohibit an independent director from serving as a director, officer, or employee of a member of the FHLBank on whose board the director sits, or of a recipient of an advance from that FHLBank, or as an officer of any FHLBank, and would also prohibit the nomination or election as an independent director of an individual serving in any such capacity.


151163
Table of Contents


Under the Bank Act, there are two types of independent directors:

Public interest directors - We are required to have at least two public interest directors. Each must have more than four years of experience representing consumer or community interests in banking services, credit needs, housing, or consumer financial protections.
Other independent directors - Independent directors must have demonstrated knowledge or experience in auditing or accounting, derivatives, financial management, organizational management, project development or risk management practices, or other expertise established by Finance Agency regulations.

Pursuant to the Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations, the board of directors, after consultation with our Affordable Housing Advisory Council, nominates candidates for the independent director positions. Individuals interested in serving as independent directors may submit an application for consideration by the Executive/Governance Committee, which performs certain functions for our board that are similar to those of a board nominating committee with respect to the nomination of candidates for election as independent directors. The application form is available on our website at www.fhlbi.com, by clicking on "Resources," "Corporate Governance" and "Board of Directors." Our members may also nominate independent director candidates. The conclusion that an independent director nominee may qualify to serve as a director is based upon the nominee's satisfaction of the eligibility criteria listed above and verified through application and eligibility certification forms prescribed by the Finance Agency. The board then submits the slated independent director candidates to the Finance Agency for review and comment. Once the Finance Agency has accepted candidates for the independent director positions, we hold a district-wide election for those positions.

Under Finance Agency regulations, if the board of directors nominates only one independent director candidate for each open seat, each candidate must receive at least 20% of the votes that are eligible to be cast in order to be elected. If there is more than one candidate for each open independent director seat, then such requirement does not apply.

20192020 Member and Independent Director Elections. The Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations set forth the voting rights and processes with respect to the election of member directors and independent directors. The board of directors does not solicit proxies, nor are eligible institutions permitted to solicit or use proxies to cast their votes in an election for directors. For the election of both member directors and independent directors, each eligible institution is entitled to cast one vote for each share of stock that it was required to hold as of the record date (i.e., December 31 of the year prior to the year in which the election is held); however, the number of votes that a member institution may cast for each directorship cannot exceed the average number of shares of stock that were required to be held by all member institutions located in the applicable state on the record date.

The only matter submitted to a vote of our shareholders in 20192020 was the fourth quarter election of three independent directors and two independentIndiana member directors. By Finance Agency regulation, two Michigan member director nominees were deemed elected without a shareholder vote. No meeting of the members was held with regard to the 20192020 election. The 20192020 election was conducted in accordance with the Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations.

Board of Directors Vacancies. If a vacancy occurs on an FHLBank's board of directors, the board, by a majority vote of the remaining directors, shall elect an individual to fill the unexpired term of office of the vacant directorship. Any individual so elected must satisfy all eligibility requirements of the Bank Act and Finance Agency regulations applicable to his or her predecessor. Before an election to fill a vacant directorship occurs, the FHLBank must obtain an executed eligibility certification form from each individual being considered to fill the vacancy, and must verify each individual's eligibility. The FHLBank must also verify the qualifications of any potential independent director. Before electing an independent director, the FHLBank must deliver to the Finance Agency for review a copy of the application form of each individual being considered by the board. Promptly following an election to fill a vacancy on the board, the FHLBank must send a notice to its members and the Finance Agency providing information about the elected director, including his or her name, company affiliation, title, term expiration date and, for member directors, the voting state that the director represents.


152164
Table of Contents


Our directors are listed in the table below, including those who served in 20192020 or serve as of March 10, 2020.2021.
NameAgeDirector Since
Term

Expiration
Independent (elected by District) or Member (elected by State)
Dan L. Moore, Chair (1)
69 701/1/201112/31/2022Member (IN)
James L. Logue, III, Vice Chair (1)
67 684/24/200712/31/2021Independent
Karen F. Gregerson, Vice Chair (1)
601/1/201312/31/2024Member (IN)
Brian D. J. Boike43 441/1/202012/31/2023Member (MI)
Jonathan P. Bradford (2)
70 714/24/200712/31/2020Independent
Ronald Brown55 561/1/201812/31/2021Member (IN)
Clifford M. Clarke571/1/202112/31/2024Member (IN)
Lisa D. Cook561/1/202112/31/2024Independent
Charlotte C. Decker55 561/1/201712/31/20202024Independent
Robert M. Fisher59 601/1/201912/31/2022Member (MI)
Karen F. Gregerson59 1/1/201312/31/2020Member (IN)
Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.75 764/24/200712/31/2021Independent
Jeffrey G. Jackson49 501/1/201912/31/2022Member (MI)
Carl E. Liedholm79 801/1/200912/31/2020Independent
Robert D. Long65 664/24/200712/31/2023Independent
Michael J. Manica71 721/1/201612/31/2023Member (MI)
Larry W. Myers61 621/1/201812/31/2021Member (IN)
Christine Coady Narayanan (3)
56 571/1/200812/31/2023Independent
John L. SkibskiTodd Sears (4)
55 521/1/2008202112/31/20192024Member (MI)Independent
Larry A. Swank77 781/1/200912/31/2022Independent
Ryan M. Warner63 641/1/201712/31/2020Member (IN)

(1)    Our board of directors, with input from the Executive/Governance Committee, elects a Chair and a Vice Chair to two-year terms. On November 16, 2018, our board elected Mr. Moore as Chair and Mr. Logue as Vice Chair for 2019-2020. On November 20, 2020, our board elected Mr. Moore as Chair and Ms. Gregerson as Vice Chair for 2021-2022.
(2)    Public Interest Director designation, effective April 24, 2007, throughout current term.through the expiration of his term on December 31, 2020.
(3)    Public Interest Director designation, effective May 15, 2014, throughout current term.
(4)    Public Interest Director designation, effective January 1, 2021, throughout current term.


165
Table of Contents


Each of our directors serves on one or more committees of our board. Committee assignments are made annually, based on board consensus, with input from the President - CEO. Committee assignments take into consideration several factors, including the committees’ responsibilities and needs, directors' preferences and expertise, the benefits of rotations in committee memberships, and balancing the committees' responsibilities among all directors. The following table presents the committees on which each director serves as of March 10, 2020,2021, as well as whether the director is the chairChair (C), vice chairVice Chair (VC), member (x), or Ex-Officio member (EO), or alternate (A) of the respective committee..
NameExecutive /Affordable HousingAuditExecutive/ GovernanceFinance/BudgetAffordable HousingHuman ResourcesAuditRisk OversightRisk OversightSuccession PlanningTechnology
Dan L. MooreEOEOCEOEOEOEOEOEO
James L. Logue IIIVCxxKaren F. Gregerson
Brian D. J. Boikexxx
Jonathan P. BradfordxXVCX
Brian D.J. BoikexXXVC
Ronald BrownXVCxXxX
Clifford M. ClarkeXXVC
Lisa D. CookXxXX
Charlotte C. DeckerxXxXC
Robert M. FisherxXXVCxCX
Karen F. GregersonMichael J. Hannigan, Jr.xXxC
Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.XxVCxVCX
Jeffrey G. Jacksonxxx
Carl E. LiedholmCxx
Robert D. LongxCx
Michael J. ManicaxXVCxX
James L. Logue IIIXVCXX
Robert D. LongCXXX
Michael J. ManicaXXCX
Larry W. MyersxXxVC
Christine Coady NarayananxXC
xChristine Coady NarayananXXC
Larry A. SwankTodd SearsxVCxCXX
Ryan M. WarnerLarry A. SwankAxCXVCXX

153
Table of Contents


It has been the practice of the board of directors to not appoint any director as Chair of more than one Committee.

The following is a summary of the background and business experience of each of our directors. Except as otherwise indicated, for at least the last five years, each director has been engaged in his or her principal occupation as described below.

Dan L. Moore is the President and CEOChairman of Home Bank SB in Martinsville, Indiana, and has served in that position since 2006. PriorJanuary 2021. Previously, he served as its Chairman, President and CEO from April 2020 to that time,January 2021, after having served as its President, CEO and director beginning in 2006. Mr. Moore served as that bank's Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Moore has also served as a director of Home Bank SB since 2000. He has been employed by Home Bank SB since 1978. Mr. Moore serves on the board of directors of Stability First, a not-for-profit organization in Martinsville, Indiana, established to address issues associated with the alleviation of poverty. He holds a bachelor of science degree from Indiana State University and a master of science degree in management from Indiana Wesleyan University.

James L. Logue IIIKaren F. Gregerson is the Chief Public Policy OfficerPresident and CEO of Cinnaire Corp., formerly Great Lakes Capital Fund,The Farmers Bank in Frankfort, Indiana, and President of The Farmers Bancorp, a housing finance and developmentbank holding company in Lansing, Michigan,Frankfort, Indiana, having been appointed to those positions in April 2016. She is also a director of both entities. Prior to those appointments, Ms. Gregerson was Senior Vice President and has held that position since 2018. He was appointed as Chief Strategy Officer in 2016 after having served as Chief OperatingFinancial Officer of Cinnaire since 2003. Prior to that, Mr. Logue served as the Executive Director of the Michigan State Housing Development AuthoritySTAR Financial Bank in Fort Wayne, Indiana, a position she held beginning in 1991. Mr. Logue has over 40 years' experience in affordable housing, finance, commercial real estate and economic development matters. He served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Multifamily Housing Programs at HUD in 1988 - 1989,and has been involved in various capacities with the issuance of housing bonds and the management of multi-billion dollar housing portfolios. Mr. Logue1997. She also serves as a board member and is chair of the Audit Committeeboard of directors of the National Housing Trust, Washington, D.C. Mr. LogueIndiana Statewide Certified Development Corporation. Ms. Gregerson holds a bachelor of artsscience degree from Kean College.Ball State University and a master of science degree in organizational leadership from the Indiana Institute of Technology. She maintains her CPA designation. The board of directors has determined that Ms. Gregerson is an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to her experience as a director, CEO and Chief Financial Officer of a commercial bank and as a CPA.


166
Table of Contents


Brian D. J. Boike is the Executive Vice President & Treasurer of Flagstar Bank, FSB, a subsidiary of Flagstar Bancorp, an NYSE-listed bank holding company located in Troy, Michigan, and has held that position since October 2014. Prior to that, Mr. Boike was Senior Vice President & Director of Capital Planning and Stress Testing of FirstMerit Bank, a subsidiary of FirstMerit Corporation (acquired by Huntington Bancshares Incorporated in August 2016), from April 2013 until October 2014. Previously, he was the Senior Vice President & Treasurer of Citizens Bank, a subsidiary of Citizens Republic Bancorp, Inc. in Flint, Michigan (acquired by FirstMerit Corporation in April 2013), from November 2009 until April 2013 and prior to that, Vice President & Asset Liability Manager from 2004 to November 2009 of Citizens Bank. He is a member of
the board of trustees and chair of the finance committee for Flint Powers Catholic High School in Flint, Michigan. Mr. Boike holds a bachelor of arts degree in economics from the University of Michigan and a MastersMaster of Arts in Political Economy degree from Boston University. Mr. Boike is also a CFA.

Jonathan P. Bradford is the owner and President of Development and Construction Resources, LLC in Grand Rapids, Michigan, which provides consulting services for non-profit companies engaged in affordable housing and community development activities. In addition, Mr. Bradford is Vice President of the board of the Michigan Non-Profit Housing Corporation, which owns several multi-family housing developments in Grand Rapids and Detroit, Michigan. Mr. Bradford retired in September 2015 as President and CEO of Inner City Christian Federation, in Grand Rapids, Michigan, a position he had held since 1981. Inner City Christian Federation is involved in the development of affordable housing, as well as housing education and counseling. Mr. Bradford holds a bachelor of arts degree from Calvin College and a master of social work degree from the University of Michigan with a concentration in housing and community development policy and planning. He is also licensed in the State of Michigan as a residential building contractor.CFA® charterholder.

Ronald Brown is Executive Vice President - General Counsel and a member of the board of directors of United Fidelity Bank, FSB, in Evansville, Indiana since January 2021, after having served as Senior Vice President - General Counsel and a member of the board of directors of United Fidelity Bank, F.S.B., in Evansville, Indiana, andFSB, since 2015. He is also Senior Vice President - General Counsel of its affiliated thrift holding company, Pedcor Financial, LLC, in Carmel, Indiana. He has held those positionsIndiana, since 2015 and 2005, respectively.2005. He is also a member of the boardsboard of two otheran affiliated companies, Pedcor Insurance Company andcompany, Pedcor Assurance Company. He is a member of the board of directors of the Indianapolis Legal Aid Society. Mr. Brown holds a bachelor of arts degree from the University of Southern California and a juris doctor degree from Indiana University.

Clifford M. Clarke is the board vice chair of Three Rivers Federal Credit Union in Fort Wayne, Indiana, since 2020, and has served as a director of the credit union since August 2012. Mr. Clarke is the founder, Principal Consultant, and President of C2 IT Advisors LLC, a strategic information technology consulting firm since December 2008. He served as the Chief Information Officer of the Public Technology Institute, a national nonprofit organization advising local municipal executives on technology, research, and best practices, located in Alexandria, Virginia, from 2009-2020. Previously, Mr. Clarke served as the Executive Director in the Office of Information Technology of Ivy Tech Community College, Fort Wayne, Indiana from July 2010 through September 2019. He has previously served as board chair of Big Brothers Big Sisters Northeast Indiana and Leadership Fort Wayne. He is the Fort Wayne Black Chamber of Commerce board president. Mr. Clarke holds a master of business administration and a bachelor of science degree, each from Indiana Institute of Technology, where he is pursuing a PhD in global leadership. Mr. Clarke holds several professional certifications including CRISC, CGEIT, CISM, CSSGB, and PMP.

Lisa D. Cook, PhD, is a Professor of Economics and International Relations at Michigan State University in East Lansing, Michigan, and has held that position since 2005. Previously, Dr. Cook was President of the National Economic Association from 2015-2016, was elected to the Executive Committee of the American Economic Association for 2019, and served in the White House Council of Economic Advisers during 2011-2012. She is a Research Associate at the National Bureau for Economic Research and has previously held visiting appointments at the University of Michigan, and the Federal Reserve Banks of Chicago, Minneapolis, New York, and Philadelphia. Dr. Cook holds a PhD in economics from the University of California, Berkeley, and bachelors of arts degrees from Spelman College and St. Hilda's College, Oxford University, Oxford, United Kingdom.

Charlotte C. Decker is Chief Information Technology Officer for the UAW Retiree Medical Benefits Trust, in Detroit, Michigan, and has held that position since December 2014. She is also a director of Quaker Chemical Corporation (also known as Quaker Houghton), a chemicals company whose board of directors she joined in May 2020. Ms. Decker also served as a Senior Consultant for Data Consulting Group, an information technology consulting services company in Detroit, Michigan, from August 2014 through December 2015. Prior to that, she was Vice President - Chief Technology Officer for Auto Club Group, an insurance and financial services company in Dearborn, Michigan, from September 2008 to June 2014. She was a Director of Global Computing for General Motors Corporation in Detroit, Michigan, from 2004 to 2007. Ms. Decker holds a bachelor of science degree, a master of science degree, and a master of business administration degree, each from the University of Michigan.


154
Table of Contents


Robert M. Fisher is President - CEO of Lake-Osceola State Bank in Baldwin, Michigan, and has held that position since 2018. He also serves as the vice chair of that bank's board of directors, and is the President and Secretary of Lake Financial Holding Company, Baldwin, Michigan, its bank holding company. Prior to that,2018, Mr. Fisher served as President - Chief Operating Officer of that bankLake-Osceola State Bank since 2005. He also serves as the Vice Chair of that bank's board of directors. Mr. Fisher is chair of the board of Baldwin Family Health Care, a community healthcare program, and also chair of the board of education for the Walkerville, Michigan Public Schools.program. Mr. Fisher holds a bachelor of business leadership degree from Baker College. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Fisher is an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to his experience as President - CEO and Chief Operating Officer of a commercial bank.

Karen F. Gregerson
167
is the President and CEOTable of The Farmers Bank in Frankfort, Indiana, and President of The Farmers Bancorp, a bank holding company in Frankfort, Indiana, having been appointed to those positions in April 2016. She is also a director of both entities. Prior to those appointments, Ms. Gregerson was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of STAR Financial Bank in Fort Wayne, Indiana, a position she held beginning in 1997. Ms. Gregerson holds a bachelor of science degree from Ball State University and a master of science degree in organizational leadership from the Indiana Institute of Technology. The board of directors has determined that Ms. Gregerson is an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to her experience as a director, CEO and Chief Financial Officer of a commercial bank.Contents


Michael J. Hannigan, Jr. has been employed in mortgage banking and related businesses for more than 30 years. Currently, he is the President of The Hannigan Company, LLC, a real estate consulting company in Carmel, Indiana, and has held that position since 2007 when he formed the company. From 19861996 to 2006, Mr. Hannigan was the Executive Vice President and a director of The Precedent Companies, Inc., a residential real estate company. Mr. Hannigan previously served as a Senior Vice President and director of Union Federal Savings Bank. During his career, Mr. Hannigan has served as a director and founding partner of several companies engaged in residential development, home building, private water utility service, industrial development, and private capital acquisition. Mr. Hannigan is a director of the Indiana Builders Association, a trade association. He holds a bachelor of business administration degree from the University of Notre Dame. He has previously served as Vice Chair of our board of directors and Vice Chair of the Council of FHLBanks.

Jeffrey G. Jackson is the Chief Lending Officer of Michigan State University Federal Credit Union, in East Lansing, Michigan, and has held that position since July 2015. Prior to that appointment, Mr. Jackson was Senior Vice President - Business Lending and Operations during 2015 and Vice President - Payment Systems and Support Services from 2012 through 2014. He has also held officer positions in Member Services, Finance and Internal Audit since he began employment with Michigan State University Federal Credit Union in 1997. Before joining that institution, he held positions with public accounting firms. Mr. Jackson also serves on the boardsboard of directors of Child and Family Charities, and previously served on the board of directors of the Michigan Credit Union Foundation, both located in Lansing, Michigan. Mr. Jackson maintains his CPA designation. He holds a bachelor of business administration degree from the University of Michigan, and a mastersmaster of business administration degree from Michigan State University. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Jackson is an Audit Committee Financial Expert primarily due to his broad experience as an officer of a financial institution and his experience in public accounting.

Carl E. Liedholm, PhDJames L. Logue III is the Executive Vice President, Policy and Government Relations of Cinnaire Corp., isformerly Great Lakes Capital Fund, a Professor of Economics at Michigan State Universityhousing finance and development company in East Lansing, Michigan, and has held that position since 1965. In JuneJanuary 2020. He previously served as Chief Public Policy Officer starting in 2018, he was appointed Professor Emeritus. He has taught graduate and post-graduate courses and presented seminars on international finance, banking and housing matters.as Chief Strategy Officer starting in 2016, after having served as Chief Operating Officer of Cinnaire since 2003. Prior to that, Mr. LiedholmLogue served as the Executive Director of the Michigan State Housing Development Authority beginning in 1991. Mr. Logue has over forty40 years' experience in generatingaffordable housing, finance, commercial real estate and analyzing financial economic development matters. He served as Deputy Assistant Secretary for Multifamily Housing Programs at HUD in 1988 - 1989,and other performance data from enterpriseshas been involved in over two dozen countries.various capacities with the issuance of housing bonds and the management of multi-billion dollar housing portfolios. Mr. LiedholmLogue serves as a board member of the National Housing Trust, Washington, D.C. Mr. Logue holds a bachelor of arts degree from Pomona College and a doctoral degree from the University of Michigan. He has published numerous books and monographs on economics and related matters.Kean College.

Robert D. Long retired from KPMG LLP on December 31, 2006, where he had been the Office Managing Partner in the Indianapolis, Indiana office since 1999, and had served as an Audit Partner for KPMG since 1988. As an audit partner, Mr. Long served a number of companies with public, private and cooperative ownership structures in a variety of industries, including banking, finance and insurance. Mr. Long maintains his CPA designation. Since December 2014, Mr. Long has been a member of the board Chair of the Audit Committee and Audit Committee financial expert for Celadon Group, Inc., a transportation and logistics company.company, also serving as its Audit Committee chair and Audit Committee financial expert from December 2014 through the termination of such committee in 2019. From 2010 to 2015, Mr. Long was a member of the board and Chairchair of the Audit Committee for Beefeaters Holding Company, Inc., a pet food company. From 2009 to 2014, Mr. Long was a member of the board and Chair of the Audit Committee for Schulman Associates Institutional Review Board, Inc., a company providing independent review services to pharmaceutical and clinical research companies. He holds a bachelor of science degree from Indiana University. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Long is an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to his previous experience as an audit partner at a major public accounting firm and as the Audit Committee chair of multiple companies.

155
Table of Contents


Michael J. Manica is the Vice Chairvice chair and a director of United Bank Financial Corporation, a bank holding company, and is Vice Chairvice chair and a director of its banking subsidiary, United Bank of Michigan, in Grand Rapids, Michigan, and has held those positions since July 2019. Before his appointments as Vice Chair,vice chair, Mr. Manica had served as a director and President and Chief Executive Officer beginning in March 2014, and as President and Chief Operating Officer beginning in 2000.2014. His career with United Bank of Michigan began in 1980. He holds a bachelor of arts degree from the University of Michigan and completed the Graduate School of Banking program at the University of Wisconsin.

Larry W. Myers is the President and CEO of First Savings Financial Group, Inc., a bank holding company, and its banking subsidiary, First Savings Bank, in Clarksville, Indiana, and has held those positions since 2009 and 2007, respectively. Previously he served as the Chief Operations Officer of First Savings Bank, and has served as a director of that bank since 2005. Mr. Myers has over 35 years' experience in retail banking, commercial lending and wealth management. Mr. Myers has served as Chairchair of the Indiana Bankers Association and currently serves on the Community Bank Council and the FHLBank Committee of the American Bankers Association. He additionally serves as an Advisory Director for the Community Depository Institutions Advisory Council of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. Mr. Myers holds a bachelor of science degree and a mastersmaster of business administration degree, both from the University of Kentucky. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Myers is an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to his extensive experience as director, CEO, and chief operations officer of a commercial bank.
168
Table of Contents


Christine Coady Narayanan is the President and CEO of Opportunity Resource Fund, a U.S. Treasury-certified CDFI with offices in Lansing, Grand Rapids, and Detroit, Michigan, having served in that position since October 2004. Opportunity Resource Fund is a non-profit CDFI that provides social impact investment opportunities for individuals and corporations throughout Michigan and engages in lending for affordable housing and community development purposes. As such, Opportunity Resource Fund is licensed and regulated by the Michigan Department of Insurance and Financial Services. Ms. Narayanan has held various positions with the Opportunity Resource Fund and its predecessor organization since 1989, and served as its Executive Director from 1997 to 2004. She holds an associate degree from Lansing Community College and a bachelor of arts degree from Spring Arbor University. Ms. Narayanan is a graduate of the National Internship in Community Economic Development and Michigan Municipal League's Elected Officials Academy and has completed certification through the Indiana University Center of Philanthropy.

Todd Sears is Executive Vice President of Research, Policy & Strategy at Kittle Property Group, Inc. (formerly Herman & Kittle Properties, Inc.), in Indianapolis, Indiana, a national multifamily housing property developer, having served in that position since March 2021. Prior to that appointment, he served as Executive Vice President from January 2018 through February 2021, after serving as Executive Vice President - Portfolio Management & Analysis beginning in January 2014. He joined Kittle Property Group Inc. in 2005. During 2020, Mr. Sears also was an adjunct professor of real estate finance at Butler University. He previously served on our Affordable Housing Advisory Council from 2012-2018. He is the founder of Pyxso, LLC, a consulting firm through which he has provided advisory services to not-for-profit companies since 2011. Mr. Sears holds a bachelor of science degree from Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, and a master of arts degree from Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana. Mr. Sears is a CFA® charterholder and holds a Chartered Alternative Investment Analyst designation.

Larry A. Swank is Founder, CEO and Chairchair of Sterling Group, Inc. and affiliated companies in Mishawaka, Indiana. Mr. Swank has served as Chairchair and CEO of Sterling Group, Inc. since 1976, and served as its President until July 2012. The principal business of that company and its affiliates involves the acquisition, development, construction and management of multi-family housing and storage units. Mr. Swank's company manages 59 properties in 14 states. Mr. Swank has served as a director of the National Association of Home Builders since 1973 and served as a member of its Executive Board for several terms. He also served as Chairchair of that association's Housing Finance Committee on three separate occasions.

Ryan M. Warner is Chairman and CEO of Bippus State Bank in Huntington, Indiana, and was appointed to that position in April 2019. Previously, Mr. Warner served as President and a director of that bank since 1987. He has been employed by that bank since 1977. Mr. Warner is a member of the Huntington County Economic Development board of directors, having previously served as its President and Treasurer. Mr. Warner holds an associate degree in accounting from International Business College, and completed the Graduate School of Banking program at the University of Wisconsin. The board of directors has determined that Mr. Warner is an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to his extensive experience as Chairman and CEO, President and in other senior management capacities in a financial institution.


156
Table of Contents


Audit Committee. Our board of directors has a standing Audit Committee that was comprised of the following directors as of December 31, 2019:2020:

Robert D. Long, Chair, independent director
Ryan M. Warner, Vice Chair
Robert M. Fisher
Karen F. Gregerson
Jeffrey G. Jackson
Larry W. Myers
Christine Coady Narayanan, independent director
John L. Skibski
Dan L. Moore, Ex-Officio Voting Member
 
Our board has determined that Mr. Long and Ms. Narayanan are "independent" under the New York Stock Exchange rules definition, and has further determined that no member director may qualify as "independent" under that definition due to the cooperative ownership structure of our Bank by its member institutions. For further discussion about the board's analysis of director independence, see Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

The Bank Act requires the FHLBanks to comply with the substantive audit committee director independence rules applicable to issuers of securities registered under the Exchange Act. Those rules provide that, to be considered an independent member of an audit committee, a director may not be an affiliated person of the registrant. The term "affiliated person" means a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the registrant. The rule provides a "safe harbor," whereby a person will not be deemed an affiliated person if the person is not the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of any class of voting securities of the registrant. All of our Audit Committee member directors' institutions presently meetmet this safe harbor.harbor as of December 31, 2020, and as of March 10, 2021.


169
Table of Contents


Audit Committee Report. Our Audit Committee operates under a written charter adopted by the board of directors that was most recently amended on March 22, 2019.19, 2020. The Audit Committee charter is available on our website by scrolling to the bottom of any web page on www.fhlbi.com and then selecting "Corporate Governance" in the navigation menu. In accordance with its charter, the Audit Committee assists the board in fulfilling its fiduciary responsibilities and overseeing the internal and external audit functions. The Audit Committee is responsible for evaluating the Bank's compliance with laws, regulations, policies and procedures (including the Code of Conduct), and for determining that the Bank has adequate administrative, operating and internal controls. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for providing reasonable assurance regarding the integrity of financial and other data used by the board, the Finance Agency, our members and the public. Furthermore, the Audit Committee oversees the programs, policies, and systems of the Bank designed to ensure the integrity and reliability of Bank operations and technology, including cybersecurity. To fulfill these responsibilities, the Audit Committee may, in accordance with its charter, conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within the Committee's scope of responsibilities. The Audit Committee may also retain independent counsel, accountants, or others to assist in any investigation.

The Audit Committee annually reviews its charter and practices and has determined that its charter and practices are consistent with all applicable laws, regulations and policies. During 2019,2020, the Audit Committee met 13 times and, among other matters, also:

reviewed the scope of and overall plans for the external and internal audit programs;
reviewed and recommended board approval of our policy with regard to the hiring of former employees of theour independent registered public accounting firm;firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers ("PwC");
reviewed and approved our policy for the pre-approval of audit and permitted non-audit services by the independent registered public accounting firm;firm ("independent auditor");
received reports pursuant to our policy for the submission and confidential treatment of communications from employees and others about accounting, internal controls and auditing matters; and
reviewed the adequacy of our internal controls, including for purposes of evaluating the fair presentation of our financial statements in connection with certifications made by our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer.officer;
discussed with management and PwC significant matters, including Critical Audit Matters, arising during the audit and other areas of significant judgment or estimation in preparing the financial statements;
reviewed and challenged management and PwC, as necessary, on how they have established materiality thresholds for establishing the controls over financial reporting and their audit process; and
discussed with management the use and appropriateness of any non-GAAP measures in the financial statements.


157
Table of Contents


The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 requires that the Audit Committee to establish and maintain procedures for the confidential submission of employee concerns regarding questionable accounting, internal controls or auditing matters. The Audit Committee has established procedures for the receipt, retention and treatment, on a confidential basis, of any related concerns we receive, including automated notifications from the EthicsPoint reporting system which was implemented to assist the Audit Committee in administering the anonymous complaint procedures. The Audit Committee ensures that the Bank is in compliance with all applicable rules and regulations with respect to the submission to the Audit Committee of anonymous complaints.receive. The Audit Committee encourages employees and third-party individuals and organizations to report concerns about accounting controls, auditing matters or anything else that appears to involve financial or other wrongdoing pertaining to the Bank.

The Bank is one of 11 regional FHLBanks across the United States which, along with the Office of Finance, compose the FHLBank System. Each FHLBank operates as a separate entity with its own management, employees, and board of directors, and each is regulated by the Finance Agency. The Office of Finance has responsibility for the issuance of consolidated obligations on behalf of the FHLBanks, and for publishing combined financial reports of the FHLBanks. Accordingly, the FHLBank System has determined that it is optimal to have the same independent audit firmauditor to coordinate and perform the separate audits of the financial statements of each FHLBank and the FHLBanks' combined financial reports. The FHLBanks and the Office of Finance cooperate in selecting, setting the compensation of, and evaluating the performance of the independent auditor, but the responsibility for the appointment of and oversight of the independent auditor remains solely with the audit committee of each FHLBank and the Office of Finance.

PricewaterhouseCoopers ("PwC")
170
Table of Contents


PwC has been the independent auditor for the FHLBank System and the Bank since 1990. The Audit Committee engages in thorough evaluations each year when appointing an independent auditor. In connection with the appointment of the Bank's independent auditor, the Audit Committee's evaluation included consultation with the Audit Committees of the other FHLBanks and the Office of Finance. In the course of these evaluations, the Audit Committee considers, among other factors:

an analysis of the risks and benefits of retaining the same firm as independent auditor versus engaging a different firm, including consideration of:
PwC engagement audit partner, engagement quality review partner and audit team rotation;
PwC's tenure as ourthe Bank's and the FHLBank System's independent auditor;
benefits associated with engaging a different firm as independent auditor; and
potential disruption and risks associated with changing the Bank's independent auditor;
PwC's familiarity with our operations and businesses, accounting policies and practices and internal control over financial reporting;
PwC's historical and recent performance of our audit, including feedback from Bank management as to PwC's service and quality;
an analysis of PwC's known legal risks and significant proceedings;
both engagement and external data relating to audit quality and performance, including recent Public Company Accounting Oversight Board audit quality inspection reports on PwC and its peer firms;firms as well as metrics indicative of audit quality;
the appropriateness of PwC's fees, on both an absolute basis and as compared to fees charged to other banks both within and beyond the FHLBank System and trends therein; and
the diversity of PwC's ownership and staff assigned to the engagement.

The Audit Committee reviews and approves the amount of fees paid to PwC for audit, audit-related and other services. Audit fees represent fees for professional services provided in connection with the audit of our annual financial statements and internal control over financial reporting and reviews of our quarterly financial statements, regulatory filings, and other SEC matters. The Audit Committee has determined that PwC did not provide any non-audit services that would impair its independence andindependence. To the Audit Committee's knowledge, there are no other matters which cause the Audit Committee to believe PwC is not independent. Based on its evaluation and review, the Audit Committee appointed PwC as our independent registered public accounting firm for the year ended December 31, 2019.

In accordance with SEC rules, audit partners are subject to rotation requirements to limit the number of consecutive years an individual partner may provide service to our Bank. For engagement audit and quality review partners, the maximum number of consecutive years of service in that capacity is five years. The process for selection of our lead audit partner pursuant to this rotation policy involves a meeting between the Chair of the Audit Committee and the candidate(s) for the role, as well as discussion by the full Audit Committee and with management. The Bank's current lead audit partner has served since 2016.


Based on its evaluation and review, the Audit Committee appointed PwC as our independent auditor for the year ended December 31, 2020.
158
Table of Contents


Management has the primary responsibility for the integrity and reliability of our financial statements, accounting and financial reporting principles, and internal controls and procedures designed to assure compliance with accounting standards and applicable laws and regulations. An independent registered public accounting firmauditor is responsible for performing an independent audit of our financial statements and of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with auditing standards promulgated by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and standards applicable to financial audits in accordance with Government Auditing Standards, issued by the Comptroller General of the United States. Our internal auditors are responsible for preparing an annual audit plan and conducting internal audits under the direction of our Chief Internal Audit Officer ("CIAO"), who reports to the Audit Committee.

The Audit Committee's responsibility is to monitor and oversee these processes. The Audit Committee has certain other responsibilities with respect to the internal audit function, including facilitation of independent, direct communications between the board and our internal auditors. The Audit Committee also reviews the scope of internal audit services required, internal audit findings, and management responses. In addition, the Audit Committee is responsible for the selection, compensation, performance evaluation and independence of the CIAO, who may be removed only with the Audit Committee’s approval. The Audit Committee also approves the incentive compensation plans and awards for internal audit employees; the charter for the internal audit department; and the staffing, budget, and risk-based internal audit plan.


171
Table of Contents


Prior to their issuance, the Audit Committee reviews and discusses the quarterly and annual earnings releases, financial statements (including the presentation of any non-GAAP financial information) and additional disclosures under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" with management, our internal auditors and PwC. The Audit Committee also oversees our internal auditors' review of our policies and practices with respect to financial risk assessment, and our processes and practices with respect to enterprise risk assessment and management (although the board's Risk Oversight Committee has primary responsibility for the review of our risk assessment and risk management matters). The Audit Committee discussed with PwC matters required to be discussed by Auditing Standard No. 1301 Communications with Audit Committee, as amended, and Rule 2-07 (Communication with Audit Committees) of Regulation S-X.S-X; received the disclosures and letter from PwC required by applicable requirements of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board concerning independence, and has discussed PwC's independence with PwC. The Audit Committee met with PwC and with our internal auditors, in each case with and without other members of management present, to discuss the results of their respective audits; their views regarding the appropriateness of management's estimates, judgments, selection of accounting policies, and systems of internal controls; and the overall quality and integrity of our financial reporting. Management represented to the Audit Committee that our financial statements were prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Based on its discussions with our management, our internal auditors and PwC, as well as its review of the representations of management and PwC's report, the Audit Committee recommended to the board, and the board has approved, the inclusion of the audited financial statements in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, for filing with the SEC.

The Audit Committee is comprised of the following directors as of March 10, 2020:2021:

Robert D. Long, Chair, independent director
Ryan M. Warner,Jeffrey G. Jackson, Vice Chair
Robert M. Fisher
Karen F. Gregerson
Jeffrey G. Jackson
Larry W. Myers
Christine Coady Narayanan, independent director
Todd Sears, independent director
Dan L. Moore, Ex-Officio Voting Member

2020 Audit Committee Financial Experts.Our board of directors has determined that Audit Committee Chair Robert D. Long, Audit Committee Vice Chair Ryan M. Warner, and Audit Committee members Robert M. Fisher, Karen F. Gregerson, Jeffrey G. Jackson and Larry W. Myers arewere Audit Committee Financial Experts under SEC rules. For information concerning theseour incumbent directors' qualifications to be so designated, please refer to their respective biographical summaries above in this Item 10.


Mr. Warner's term as a director ended on December 31, 2020. The board of directors determined that Mr. Warner was an Audit Committee Financial Expert due primarily to his extensive experience as chairman and CEO, president and in other senior management capacities in a financial institution.
159172
Table of Contents


Executive Officers

Our Executive Officers during the last completed fiscal year, as determined under SEC rules, are listed in the table below. Each officer serves a term of office of one calendar year or until the election and qualification of his or her successor, provided, however, that pursuant to the Bank Act, our board of directors may dismiss any officer at any time. Except as indicated, each officer has been employed in the principal occupation listed below for at least five years.
NameAgePosition
Cindy L. Konich (1)
6364President - Chief Executive Officer ("CEO")
William D. Miller (2)
6263Executive Vice President - Chief Risk and Compliance Officer ("CRCO")Economist
Deron J. Streitenberger (3)
5253Executive Vice President - Chief Business Operations Officer ("CBOO")
Gregory L. Teare (4)
6667Executive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer ("CFO")
Chad A. Brandt (5)
5556Senior Vice President - Treasurer
Shaun H. Clifford (6)
60Senior Vice President - General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer (Ethics Officer)
Kristina L. Cunningham (7)
45Senior Vice President - Senior Director of Compliance & Operational Risk Analysis
Christopher Dawson (6)(8)
4344Senior Vice President - Chief Information Officer
Jonathan W. Griffin (7) (9)
4950Senior Vice President - Chief Business Development Officer
Kania D. Lottie (8) (10)
3839Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resources and Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer (Ethics Officer)
Brendan McGrath (9)(11)
4243Senior Vice President - Chief AnalyticsRisk Officer ("CRO")
Gregory J. McKee (10)(12)
4647Senior Vice President - Chief Internal Audit Officer
K. Lowell Short, Jr. (11)(13)
6364Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO")
Mary Beth Wott (12) (14)
5556Senior Vice President - Community Investment Officer

(1)Ms. Konich was appointed by our board of directors to serve as President - CEO in July 2013. Prior to that appointment, she served as Acting Co-President - CEO for two periods during 2013. Previously, Ms. Konich was promoted to Executive Vice President - Chief Operating Officer - Chief Financial Officer in July 2010 after having served as Senior Vice President - Chief Financial Officer beginning in September 2007. As an FHLBank President, she serves on the Board of Directors of the FHLBank Office of Finance, and is a member of its Governance Committee. Ms. Konich holds an MBA and is a CPA.
(2)    Mr. MillerMiller's employment with the Bank ceased effective February 19, 2021. He was promoted toappointed Executive Vice President - Chief Economist effective May 25, 2020. Previously, he had been appointed Executive Vice President - Chief Risk and Compliance Officer in November 2018, after having been appointed Executive Vice President - Chief Risk Officer effective January 2017, after having been appointed by our board of directors asand Senior Vice President - Chief Risk Officer in February 2014. In November 2018, Mr. Miller was appointed by the board to the additional position of Chief Compliance Officer. Mr. Miller holds an MBA.
(3)    Mr. Streitenberger was promoted to Executive Vice President - CBOO effective January 2019, after having been appointed by our board of directors as Senior Vice President - CBOO in November 2015.effective January 2016. Prior to that, he was appointed as Senior Vice President - Chief Information /and MPP Operations Officer in February 2015. He was previously promoted to Senior Vice President - Chief Information Officer effective January 2015. Mr. Streitenberger holds an MBA.
(4)    Mr. Teare was promoted to Executive Vice President - CFO effective January 2017, after having been appointed by our board of directors as Senior Vice President - CFO in February 2015. He was previously appointed by our board of directors as Senior Vice President - Chief Banking Officer in September 2008. Mr. Teare holds an MBA.
(5)    Mr. Brandt was appointed by our board of directors as Senior Vice President - Treasurer effective January 2016. Previously, Mr. Brandt was Vice President and Senior Manager - Liquidity and Funding at BMO Harris Bank from July 2015 to December 2015. Prior to that, he was Managing Principal of North Center Management Partners LLC from December 2014 to July 2015. Mr. Brandt holds an MBA.
(6)    Ms. Clifford was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel effective March 16, 2020, and was appointed Senior Vice President - General Counsel & Chief Compliance Officer effective May 25, 2020. Ms. Clifford also serves as one of the Bank's Ethics Officers. Previously, Ms. Clifford was a Partner at the law firm Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP from January 2003 to February 2020. Ms. Clifford holds a JD and is licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana and in Washington, D.C.
(7)    Ms. Cunningham was promoted to Senior Vice President - Senior Director of Compliance & Operational Risk Analysis effective May 25, 2020. Previously, she was appointed First Vice President - Senior Director of Compliance + Operational Risk Analysis effective November 2018, after having been appointed First Vice President - Director of Operational Risk Analysis effective January 2018, and Vice President - Director of Operational Risk Analysis in March 2016. Ms. Cunningham holds an MBA and a CRMA certification, and is a CPA.
173
Table of Contents


(8)    Mr. Dawson was promoted to Senior Vice President - Chief Information Officer effective January 2019, after having been appointed by our board of directors as First Vice President - Chief Technology Officer in November 2015. Prior to that, he was appointed by our board of directors as Vice President - Director of Technology Services in March 2014. Mr. Dawson holds an MBA.
(7) (9)    Mr. Griffin was appointed Senior Vice President - Chief Business Development Officer in June 2018, after serving as Senior Vice President - Chief Marketing Officer from 2017 to 2018. Mr. Griffin was promoted by our board of directors to Senior Vice President - Chief Credit and Marketing Officer effective January 2015. Mr. Griffin holds an MBA and is a CFA.CFA® charterholder.
(8) (10)    Ms. Lottie was promoted to Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resources and Diversity & Inclusion Officer in July 2019, after havingwhich position was redesignated as Senior Vice President - Chief Human Resources and Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion Officer in September 2020. Previously, she had been appointed by our board of directors as First Vice President - Director of Human Resources and Diversity & Inclusion in November 2018. Prior to that, she was2018, after having been appointed First Vice President - Director of Human Resources effective January 2018. Ms. Lottie was appointed Vice President - Director of Human Resources effective January 2016 after having served as Vice President - Director of Human Resources and Administration & Corporate Secretary since May 2015 and as Vice President - Associate General Counsel & Corporate Secretary since January
160
Table of Contents


2014.2015. Ms. Lottie also serves as one of the Bank's Ethics Officers. She holds an MBA and a JD and is licensed to practice law in the State of Indiana. She also holds SPHR and SHRM-SCP certifications.
(9)(11)    Mr. McGrath was promoted to Senior Vice President - Chief Risk Officer effective May 25, 2020, after having been appointed Senior Vice President - Chief Analytics Officer effective January 2019, after having been appointed by our board of directors asand First Vice President - Director of Credit Risk Analysis ineffective January 2017. Prior to that, Mr. McGrath was appointed by our board of directors as Vice President - Director of Credit Risk Analysis in May 2014. Mr. McGrath holds a masters of science in accounting, is a CPA and a CFA.CFA® charterholder.
(10)(12)    Mr. McKee was promoted to Senior Vice President - Chief Internal Audit Officer effective January 2015. Mr. McKee holds an MBA and is a CPA.
(11) (13)    Mr. Short was appointed by our board of directors as Senior Vice President - CAO in August 2009. Mr. Short holds an MBA and is a CPA.
(12) (14)    Ms. Wott was promoted to Senior Vice President - Community Investment Officer effective July 2019, after having been appointed by our board of directors as First Vice President - Community Investment Officer in July 2013. Ms. Wott holds an MBA.

Code of Ethics and Codes of Conduct

We have a Code of ConductEthics for Senior Financial Officers ("Code of Ethics") that is applicableapplies to all directors, officers and employees of our Bank, including our principal executive officer, our principal financial officer, and our principal accounting officer ("Senior Financial Officers"). The Code of Ethics sets forth the obligations of the Senior Financial Officers related to honest and ethical conduct; full, fair, accurate, timely, and understandable disclosures; compliance with applicable laws, rules and regulations; prompt internal reporting of Code of Ethics violations; and accountability for adherence to the membersCode of ourEthics. The Bank intends to post information regarding any amendments to, or waivers from, its Code of Ethics on its website. We additionally have a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy for Affordable Housing Advisory Council. TheCouncil Members, a Code of Conduct isand Conflict of Interest Policy for Directors and a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy for Employees and Contractors (collectively, the "Codes of Conduct").

The Codes of Conduct and the Code of Ethics are available on our website by scrolling to the bottom of any web page on www.fhlbi.com and then selecting "Corporate Governance" in the navigation menu. Interested persons may also request a copy of the Codes of Conduct and the Code of Ethics by contacting us, Attention: Corporate Secretary, FHLBank of Indianapolis, 8250 Woodfield Crossing Boulevard, Indianapolis, IN 46240.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Not Applicable.

174
Table of Contents


ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Human Resources Committee ("HR Committee") is a standing committee that serves as the Compensation Committee of the board of directors and is comprised solely of directors. No officers or employees of our Bank serve on the HR Committee.Committee, nor do any Bank officers serve as directors of any member institution or of any other entity, one of whose officers is a director of our Bank. Further, no director serving on the HR Committee has ever been an officer of our Bank or had any other relationship that would be disclosable under Item 404 of SEC Regulation S-K.

Compensation Committee Report

The HR Committee has reviewed and discussed with Bank management the "Compensation Discussion and Analysis" that follows and, based on such review and discussions, has by resolution recommended to our board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Form 10-K for 2019.2020.

As of the dates indicated, the HR Committee was comprised of the following directors:

NameDecember 31, 20192020March 10, 20202021
Christine Coady NarayananChairChair
Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.Robert M. FisherVice ChairChair
Brian D.J. BoikeMember
Ronald BrownMemberVice Chair
Clifford M. ClarkeMember
Charlotte C. DeckerMemberMember
Robert M. FisherMichael J. Hannigan, Jr.MemberVice ChairMember
James L. Logue, IIIMember
Robert D. LongMemberMember
Ryan M. WarnerMember
Dan L. MooreEx-OfficioEx-Officio



161
Table of Contents


Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview. To provide perspective on our compensation programs and practices for our Named Executive Officers ("NEOs"), we have included certain information in this Compensation Discussion and Analysis relating to Executive Officers and employees other than the NEOs. Our NEOs for 20192020 consisted of (i) individuals who served as our principal executive officer ("PEO") during such year, (ii) individuals who served as our principal financial officer ("PFO") during such year, and (iii) the three most highly compensated officers (other than the officers who served as PEO or PFO) who were serving as Executive Officers (as defined in SEC rules) at the end of 2019.2020. The following persons were our NEOs for 2019,2020, the period covered by this Compensation Discussion and Analysis.

NEOTitle
Cindy L. KonichPresident - Chief Executive Officer ("CEO") - PEO
Gregory L. TeareExecutive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer ("CFO") - PFO
William D. Miller(1)
Executive Vice President - Chief Risk and Compliance Officer ("CRCO")Economist
Deron J. StreitenbergerExecutive Vice President - Chief Business Operations Officer ("CBOO")
K. Lowell Short, Jr.Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer ("CAO")

(1)    Mr. Miller's employment with the Bank ceased effective February 19, 2021.


175
Table of Contents


Our executive compensation program is overseen by the Executive/Governance Committee (with respect to the President - CEO's performance and compensation) and the HR Committee (with respect to the other NEOs' compensation), and ultimately by the entire board of directors. The HR Committee meets at scheduled times throughout the year (six(eight times in 2019)2020) and reports its recommendations to the board. The HR Committee has the authority to obtain advice and assistance from outside legal counsel, compensation consultants, and other advisors as the HR Committee deems necessary, with all fees and expenses paid by our Bank. The Executive/Governance Committee assists the board in the governance of our Bank, including nominations of the Chair and Vice Chair of the board and its committee structures and assignments, and in overseeing the affairs of our Bank during intervals between regularly scheduled meetings of the board, as provided in our bylaws. The Executive/Governance Committee meets as needed throughout the year (five(eight times in 2019)2020) and reports its recommendations to the board.

Regulation of Executive Compensation.

Bank Act and Finance Agency Executive Compensation Rule. Because we are a GSE, our executive compensation programs are subject to regulation by the Finance Agency. The Safety and Soundness Act and the Finance Agency's rule on executive compensation ("Executive Compensation Rule") provide the Finance Agency Director with the authority to prevent the FHLBanks from paying compensation to executive officers that is not "reasonable and comparable" to compensation for employment paid at institutions of similar size and function for similar duties and responsibilities. While the Safety and Soundness Act and the Executive Compensation Rule prohibit the Director from setting specific levels or ranges of compensation for FHLBank executive officers, the Executive Compensation Rule does authorize the Director to identify relevant factors for determining whether executive compensation is reasonable and comparable. Such factors include but are not limited to: (i) duties and responsibilities of the position; (ii) compensation factors that indicate added or diminished risks, constraints, or aids in carrying out the responsibilities of the position; and (iii) performance of the executive officer's institution, the specific executive officer, or one of the institution's significant components with respect to achievement of goals, consistency with supervisory guidance and internal rules of the entity, and compliance with applicable lawlaws and regulation.regulations. We have incorporated these factors into our development, implementation, and review of compensation policies and practices for executive officers, as described below.

Pursuant to the Executive Compensation Rule, the Finance Agency requires the FHLBanks to provide information to the Finance Agency for review and non-objection concerning all compensation actions relating to the respective FHLBanks' executive officers. This information, including studies of comparable compensation, must be provided to the Finance Agency at least 30 days in advance of any planned FHLBank payment of compensation to executive officers. In addition, the FHLBanks are required to provide at least 60 days' advance notice to the Finance Agency of any arrangement that provides for incentive awards to executive officers. Under the supervision of our board of directors, we provide this information to the Finance Agency as required.

162
Table of Contents


Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin 2009-AB-02. Finance Agency Advisory Bulletin 2009-AB-02 sets forth certain principles for executive compensation practices to which each FHLBank and the Office of Finance should adhere in setting executive compensation. These principles consist of the following:

executive compensation must be reasonable and comparable to that offered to executives in similar positions at other comparable financial institutions;
executive incentive compensation should be consistent with sound risk management and preservation of the par value of the FHLBank's capital stock;
a significant percentage of an executive's incentive-based compensation should be tied to longer-term performance and outcome indicators;
a significant percentage of an executive's incentive-based compensation should be deferred and made contingent upon performance over several years; and
the FHLBank's board of directors should promote accountability and transparency in the process of setting compensation.

In evaluating an FHLBank's compensation, the Finance Agency Director will consider the extent to which an executive's compensation is consistent with these advisory bulletin principles. We have incorporated these principles into our development, implementation, and review of compensation policies and practices for executive officers, as described below.


176
Table of Contents


Finance Agency Rule on Golden Parachute Payments. The Finance Agency's rule on golden parachute payments ("Golden Parachute Rule") sets forth the standards that the Finance Agency will take into consideration when limiting or prohibiting golden parachute payments by an FHLBank, the Office of Finance, Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. The Golden Parachute Rule generally prohibits golden parachute payments except in limited circumstances with Finance Agency approval. Golden parachute payments may include compensation paid to a director, officer or employee following the termination of such person's employment by a regulated entity that is insolvent, is in conservatorship or receivership, is required by the Finance Agency Director to improve its financial condition, or has been assigned a composite examination rating of 4 or 5 by the Finance Agency. Golden parachute payments generally do not include payments made pursuant to a qualified pension or retirement plan, an employee welfare benefit plan, a bona fide deferred compensation plan, a nondiscriminatory severance pay plan, or payments made by reason of the death or disability of the individual. The golden parachute provisions in our benefit plans comply with the Golden Parachute Rule.

Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. In 2019,2020, our board of directors adopted a resolution updating our statement of compensation philosophy. Pursuant to the resolution, our compensation philosophy is to provide a market-competitive compensation and benefits package that will enable us to effectively recruit, promote, retain and motivate highly qualified employees, management and leadership talent for the benefit of our Bank, its members, and other stakeholders. We desire to be competitive and forward-thinking while maintaining a prudent risk management culture. Thus, our compensation program encourages operational excellence, superior member service, responsible growth and prudent risk-taking while delivering a competitive pay package.

Specifically, our compensation program is designed to reward:
 
attainment of performance goals;
implementation of short- and long-term business strategies;
accomplishment of our public policy mission;
effective and appropriate management of financial, operational, reputational, regulatory, and human resources risks;
growth and enhancement of senior management leadership and functional competencies; and
accomplishment of goals to maintain an efficient, cooperative system of FHLBanks.

The board of directors regularly reviews these goals and the compensation alternatives available and may make changes in the program from time to time to better achieve these goals or to comply with Finance Agency directives. As a cooperative, we are not able to offer equity-based compensation, and only member institutions (or their legal successors) may own our stock. Without equity incentives to attract, reward and retain NEOs and senior management, we provide alternative compensation and benefits such as cash incentive opportunities, pension (with respectrespect to three of the NEOs identified in this Report) andNEOs) or additional non-elective contributions (with respect to the other two NEOs) and other retirement benefits (as to all NEOs). This approach generally will lead to a mix of compensation for NEOs that emphasizes base salary, provides meaningful incentive opportunities, and creates a competitive total compensation opportunity relative to the market.


163
Table of Contents


Role of the Executive/Governance and HR Committees in Setting Executive Compensation. The Executive/Governance and HR Committees intend that our executive compensation program be aligned with our Bank-wide short-term and long-term business objectives and focus executives' efforts on fulfilling these objectives. The Executive/Governance Committee reviews the President - CEO's performance and researches and recommends the President - CEO's salary to the board of directors. The President - CEO determines the salaries of the other NEOs, generally after consulting with the HR Committee, as discussed below. The HR Committee recommends, for approval by the board, the percentage of salary increases that will apply to merit and promotional andor internal pay equity increasesadjustments for each year's budget. The benefit plans that will be offered, and any material changes to those plans from time to time, are approved by the board after review and recommendation by the HR Committee. The HR Committee also recommends the goals, payouts and qualifications for both the annual incentive awards and the deferred incentive awards for the board's review and approval.

Our Executive/Governance and HR Committees operate under written charters adopted by the board of directors, and most recently reviewed by the board as of March 22, 2019January 7, 2020, and January 24, 2020,22, 2021, respectively. Those charters are available on our website by scrolling to the bottom of any web page on www.fhlbi.com and then selecting "Corporate Governance" in the navigation menu.


177
Table of Contents


Role of Compensation Consultants in Setting Executive Compensation. For each of the last nineten years, McLagan Partners, Inc. ("McLagan"), an Aon plc company, was engaged by Bank management to work with the HR Committee to evaluate and update our salary and benefit benchmarks for certain positions, including the NEOs' positions, in our Bank. Many other FHLBanks engage McLagan for similar compensation-related services.

The salary and benefit benchmarks we use to establish reasonable and competitive compensation for our employees are the competitor groups identified by McLagan. The competitor groups are comprised of selected firms that participated in McLagan's Financial Industry Salary Survey. The firms included in the competitor groups can change year-to-year, based on changes in the composition of the McLagan survey participants, changes in financial metrics of firms that participated in the survey for that year, and McLagan's analysis.

As a guideline, McLagan considers compensation for a role within 10 percent of the market benchmark to be competitive and within 15 percent to be within the competitive market range. We consider this general range along with our financial performance, stability, prudent risk-taking and conservative operating philosophies, internal pay equity, and our compensation philosophy.

For 2019,2020, McLagan identified three peer groups, which are collectively referred to as "Competitor Groups." The first peer group is comprised of the 10 other FHLBanks. The benchmark positions used from the other FHLBanks are comparable to the positions at our Bank (e.g., CEO to CEO).



164
178
Table of Contents


The second peer group consists of a number of large financial institutions and regional commercial banks, and other financial institutions, as well as the Federal Reserve Banks. There are 110102 institutions in the second peer group. The benchmark positions used from the other regional/large financial institutions and regional commercial banks include the divisional/functional heads, rather than the overall head of the bank, to account for the difference in scale of activities at a large regional banksuch institutions compared to an FHLBank (e.g., Head of Corporate Banking used in the benchmark, rather than a large financial institution's or regional bank's CEO, as the appropriate comparison to the FHLBank's CEO). While the benchmark jobs from the large financial institutions and regional/commercial banks capture the functional responsibility of FHLBank positions, they do not capture the executive responsibility that exists at the FHLBank.

AIBABN AMROFederal Reserve Bank of AtlantaNordeaNew York Community Bank
AIBFederal Reserve Bank of BostonNomura Securities
Ally Financial Inc.Federal Reserve Bank of BostonChicagoNorinchukinNord/LB
Arvest Bank New York BranchFederal Reserve Bank of Kansas CityNordea Bank
Associated BankFederal Reserve Bank of ClevelandMinneapolisNorthern Trust Corporation
Australia & New Zealand Banking GroupFederal Reserve Bank of Kansas CityNew YorkPacWest BancorpOCBC Bank
Banco Bilbao Vizcaya ArgentariaFederal Reserve Bank of MinneapolisRichmondPeople's UnitedOneMain Financial Inc.
Banc Itau UnibancoBank ABCFederal Reserve Bank of New YorkSan FranciscoPNC BankPeople's United Financial, Inc.
Bank HapoalimFederal Reserve Bank of RichmondSt. LouisPopular CommunityPNC Bank
Bank of America Merrill LynchFederal ReserveFifth Third Bank of San FranciscoRabobank
Bank of New York MellonFederal Reserve Bank of St LouisRegions Financial Corporation
Bank of Nova ScotiaIrelandFifth ThirdFirst Citizens Bank - NCRoyal Bank of Canada
Bank of the WestNew York MellonFirst CitizensNational Bank of OmahaRoyal Bank of Scotland Group
Bayerische LandesbankBank of Nova ScotiaFirst Republic BankSantander Bank, NASallie Mae
BBVA CompassBank of the WestFirst Tennessee Bank/First HorizonSantander Bank, NA
Bayerische LandesbankFlagstar BankSiemens Financial Services
BBVAFreddie MacSignature Bank - NY
BBVA CompassFrost BankSociete Generale
BMO Financial GroupFNB OmahaSociete Generale
BNP ParibasFreddie MacHancock Whitney BankStandard Chartered Bank
BOK Financial CorporationBNP ParibasGE CapitalHSBCState Street Corporation
Branch Banking & Trust Co.BOK Financial CorporationHancock BankHuntington Bancshares, Inc.Sterling National Bank
Brown Brothers HarrimanHSBCINGSumitomo Mitsui Banking Corporation
Capital OneHuntington Bancshares, Inc.Sumitomo Mitsui Trust Bank
Charles Schwab & Co.ICBC Financial ServicesSun Trust Banks
China Merchants BankINGIntesa SanpaoloSVB Financial Group
CIBC World MarketsIntesa SanpaoloInvestec BankSynchronySynovus Financial Corporation
CIT Group Inc.Investors Bancorp, IncSynovusTD Securities
CitigroupJP Morgan ChaseTD AmeritradeTexas Capital Bank
Citizens Financial GroupKBC BankTD SecuritiesTruist
City National BankKeyCorpTexas Capital BankU.S. Bancorp
ComericaLandesbank Baden-WuerttembergThe PrivateBank
Commerce BankLloyds Banking GroupU.S. BancorpUMB Financial Corporation
CommerzbankCommerce BankM&T Bank CorporationUMB Financial CorporationUniCredit Bank AG
CommerzbankMacquarie BankValley National Bancorp
Commonwealth Bank of AustraliaMacquarie BankMitsubishi UFJ TrustUmpquaWebster Bank
Crédit Agricole CIBMB FinancialMUFG Bank, Ltd.UniCreditWells Fargo Bank AG
Credit Industriel et Commercial – N.Y.MUFG Bank, Ltd.Valley National Bank
Cullen Frost Bankers, Inc.MUFG SecuritiesWebster Bank
DBS BankNational Australia BankWells Fargo Bank
DZ Bank NatixisWestpac BankingWintrust Financial Corporation
East West BancorpNew York Community BankZions Bancorporation
Fannie MaeNord/LBNatixisZions Bancorporation


165179
Table of Contents


The third peer group consists of 23 publicly-traded regional/commercial banks with assets of $10 billion to $20 billion. There are 36 banks in the third peer group. The benchmark jobs used from this peer group include the NEOs reported in their proxy statements, which capture the executive responsibilities encompassed in the positions.

Banc of California Inc.Ameris BancorpFCBCVB Financial Holdings Inc.Corp.Old National BancorpInternational Bancshares Corp.
BancorpSouth BankAtlantic Union Bkshs Corp.First Financial Bancorp.Northwest Bancshares, Inc.
Axos Financial Inc.First Interstate BancSystemSimmons First National Corp.Pacific Premier Bancorp
Bank of Hawaii Corp.First Merchants Corp.Renasant Corp.
Banner Corp.First Midwest Bancorp Inc.South State Corporation
Berkshire Hills Bancorp Inc.Glacier Bancorp Inc.TowneBank
Cadence Bancorp.Great Western Bancorp Inc.Trustmark Corp.
Cathay General BancorpHilltop HoldingsHeartland Financial USA Inc.United Bankshares Inc.
Chemical Financial CorpCenterState Bank Corp.Home BancShares Inc.United Community Banks Inc.
Columbia Banking System Inc.Hope Bancorp, Inc.Washington Federal Inc.
Community Bank System Inc.International BancsharesIndependent Bank Corp.WesBanco Inc.
Customers Bancorp Inc.Independent Bk Group Inc.WSFS Financial Corp.

The benchmark jobs selected by McLagan from the Competitor Groups collectively capture the functional and executive responsibilities of our NEO positions, represent comparable market opportunities and represent realistic employment opportunities. We establish threshold, target and maximum base and anticipated incentive pay levels based on this competitor groupCompetitor Group analysis, while actual pay levels are based on our financial performance, stability, prudent risk-taking and conservative operating philosophies, internal pay equity, and our compensation philosophy, as discussed above.

Role of the Named Executive Officers in the Compensation Process. The NEOs may assist the HR Committee and the board of directors by providing data and background information to any compensation consultants engaged by management, the board or the HR Committee. The Human Resources department assists the HR Committee and compensation consultants by gathering research on the Bank's hiring and turnover statistics, compensation trends, peer groups, cost of living, and other market data requested by the President - CEO, the HR Committee, the Finance/Budget Committee, the Audit Committee, the Executive/Governance Committee, or the board. Senior management (including the NEOs) prepares the strategic plan financial forecasts, which are then considered by the Finance/Budget Committee and by the board when establishing the goals and anticipated payout terms for the incentive compensation plan. The CRCOCRO oversees the Enterprise Risk Management ("ERM") department's review, from a risk perspective, of the incentive compensation plan's risk-related performance goals and target achievement levels.

Compensation Risk. The HR Committee and the Executive/Governance Committee review our policies and practices of compensating our employees, including non-executive officers, and have determined that none of these policies or practices result in any risk that is reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our Bank. Further, based on such reviews, the HR Committee and the Executive/Governance Committee believe that our plans and programs contain features that operate to mitigate risk and reduce the likelihood of employees taking excessive risks relating to the compensation-related aspects of their duties. In addition, the material plans and programs operate within a strong governance, review and regulatory structure that serves and supports risk mitigation.


166180
Table of Contents


Elements of Compensation Used to Achieve Compensation Philosophy and Objectives. The total compensation mix for NEOs in 20192020 consisted of:

(1)base salaries;
(2)    annual and deferred incentive opportunities;
(3)retirement benefits;
(4)perquisites and other benefits; and
(5)potential payments upon termination or change in control.

The board of directors has structured the compensation programs to comply with Internal Revenue Code ("IRC") Section 409A. If an executive is entitled to nonqualified deferred compensation benefits that are subject to IRC Section 409A, and such benefits do not comply with IRC Section 409A, then the benefits are taxable in the first year they are not subject to a substantial risk of forfeiture. In such case, the executive is subject to payment of regular federal income tax, interest and an additional federal income tax of 20% of the benefit includable in income. The Key Employee Severance Agreement ("KESA") between our Bank and our President-CEO contains provisions that "gross-up" certain benefits paid thereunder in the event she should become liable for an excise tax on such benefits. Other elements of our NEOs' compensation may be adjusted to reflect the tax effects of such compensation.

Base Salaries. Unless otherwise described, the term "base salary" as used in this Item 11 refers to an individual's annual salary, including any adjustments, before considering incentive compensation, deferred compensation, perquisites, taxes, or any other adjustments that may be elected or required. We recruit and desire to retain senior management from national markets. Consequently, the cost of living in Indiana is not a direct factor in determining base salary. Merit increases to base salaries are used, in part, to keep our NEO salary levels competitive with those in the Competitor Groups.

The President - CEO's base salary is established annually by the board after review and recommendation by the Executive/Governance Committee. Our board has concluded that the level of scrutiny to which the base salary determination for the President - CEO is subjected is appropriate in light of the nature of the position and the extent to which she is responsible for the overall performance of our Bank. In setting the President - CEO's base salary, the Executive/Governance Committee and the board have discretion to consider a wide range of factors, including the overall performance of our Bank, the President - CEO's individual performance, her tenure, and the amount of her base salary relative to the base salaries of executives in similar positions in companies in our Competitor Groups. Although a policy or a specific formula has not been developed for such purpose, the Executive/Governance Committee and the board also consider the amount and relative percentage of the President - CEO's total compensation that is derived from her base salary. In light of the variety of factors that are considered, the Executive/Governance Committee and the board have not attempted to rank or otherwise assign relative weights to the factors they consider. Rather, the Executive/Governance Committee and the board consider all the factors as a whole, including data and recommendations from McLagan.

After an advisory consultation with the HR Committee, the base salaries for our other NEOs are set or approved annually by the President - CEO, who has discretion to consider a wide range of factors including competitive benchmark data from McLagan, each NEO's qualifications, responsibilities, assessed performance contribution, tenure, position held, amount of base salary relative to similarly-positioned executives in our Competitor Groups and our overall salary budget. Although a policy or a specific formula has not been developed for such purpose, the President - CEO also considers the amounts and relative percentages of the NEOs' total compensation that are derived from their base salaries, including data and recommendations from McLagan.

In September 2018, the HR Committee recommended and the board of directors approved for the 2019 salary budget (i) merit and market-based increases averaging 3.0% of annualThe NEOs’ base salaries for all employees and (ii) promotional and equity adjustments averaging an additional 1.5% of annual base salaries. These approved amounts were incorporated into our 2019 operating budget as recommended by our Finance/Budget Committee and approved by our board of directors in November 2018. NEO base salary increases above 3% for 2019 were not taken from the pool of merit and market-based increases approved by the board for 2019.

The NEOs' base salaries for 20192020 were effective December 22, 2018 and23, 2019. Annual base salaries are typically paid in 26 even biweekly installments. However, during 2020, we paid a 27th installment on December 31, 2020 because the first scheduled pay date of 2021 was on the holiday of January 1, 2021. The salary amounts presented in the Summary Compensation Table.
Table reflect the actual payments received for 2020, which reflects 27 pay periods rather than the customary 26 pay periods. All of our compensation programs are calculated on the basis of such person's base salary, i.e., the total salary received by a participant during the year, except where otherwise noted.

167
Table of Contents


Annual and Deferred Incentive Opportunities. Generally, as an executive's level of responsibility increases, a greater percentage of total compensation is based on our overall performance. Our incentive plan has a measurement framework that rewards achievement of specific goals consistent with our mission. As discussed below, our incentive plan is performance-based and represents a reasonable risk-return balance for our cooperative members both as users of our products and as shareholders.shareholders, and is appropriate to our status and risk appetite as a housing GSE.
 
181
Table of Contents


The board of directors adopted an incentive compensation plan effective January 1, 2012 ("Incentive Plan"). The Incentive Plan provides cash award opportunities based on achievement of performance goals. The purpose of the Incentive Plan is to attract, retain and motivate employees and to focus their efforts on a reasonable level of profitability while maintaining safety and soundness. Employees in the Internal Audit department are excluded from the Incentive Plan but are eligible to participate in a separate incentive compensation plan established by the Audit Committee. With certain exceptions, any eligible employee hired before October 1 of a calendar year becomes a "Participant" in the Incentive Plan for that calendar year. A "Level I Participant" is the Bank's President - CEO, an EVP or a SVP, while a "Level II Participant" is any other participating employee. All NEOs identified as of each December 31 are included among the eligible Level I Participants and must execute an agreement with us containing certain non-solicitation and non-disclosure provisions.

Performance goals and the relative weight to be accorded to each goal are established annually by the HR Committee and approved by the board of directors for each calendar-year period ("Performance Period") and three-calendar-year period ("Deferral Performance Period"). The board also approves the "Threshold," "Target" and "Maximum" achievement levels for each performance goal to determine how much of an award may be earned. The achievement of performance goals determines the value of awards, which for Level I Participants (including the NEOs), which may be Annual Awards (relating to achievement of performance goals over a Performance Period) and Deferred Awards (relating to achievement of performance goals over a Deferral Performance Period), and for other Level II Participants (Annualincludes Annual Awards only).only. The board may adjust the performance goals to ensure the purposes of the Incentive Plan are served, but made no such adjustments during 2017, 2018, 2019 or 2019.
2020. The board establishes a maximum award for eligible Participants before the beginning of each Performance Period. Each award equals a percentage of the Participant's annual compensation, which is generally defined as the Participant's annual earned base salary (i.e., amount actually received during the year as salary) or wages for hours worked.worked, including overtime, and hours paid under the Bank's paid-time-off policies, as applicable, but excluding any bonus, incentive compensation, deferred compensation payments, lump sum payouts for accrued but unused vacation time, or long-term disability insurance payments paid for the current or a prior year.

With respect to the NEOs' Annual Awards and Deferred Awards, 50% of an award to a Level I Participant will become earned and vested on the last day of the Performance Period (Annual Award), subject to the achievement of specified Bank performance goals over such period, the attainment of a specific minimum individual performance rating for such period, and active employment on the last day of such period (subject to certain limited exceptions relating to the circumstances of employment termination before the end of the Performance Period). The remaining 50% will become earned and vested on the last day of the Deferral Performance Period (Deferred Award), subject to the attainment of a specific minimum individual performance rating for each year of such period, and active employment on the last day of such period (subject to certain limited exceptions relating to the circumstances of employment termination before the end of the Deferral Performance Period), and further subject to the Bank's achievement during the Deferral Performance Period of additional performance goals relating to our profitability, retained earnings, regulatory capital-to-assets ratio, and prudential management objectives.distributions in compliance with AHP funding requirements. Depending on our performance during the Deferral Performance Period, the final award (i.e., the amount of the earned and vested Deferred Award ultimately paid to the Level I Participant) will be worth 75% at Threshold, 100% at Target or 125% at Maximum of the original amount of the Deferred Award. The level of achievement of those additional goals could thereby result in an increase or decrease to the Deferred Awards.Awards, through which the Level I Participants share in the Bank's performance for a longer term.

If a Participant changes his or her status under the Incentive Plan, their Awards are prorated to reflect the portion of the year in such status. Specifically, if a Participant transfers into a department with different performance goal weights during a year, the Participant is eligible for a pro-rata Award for the the portion of the Performance Period the Participant was subject to the performance goal weights applicable to each department. This was the case for one of our NEOs for 2020. Similarly, a Level II Participant that becomes a Level I Participant during the Performance Period is eligible for a prorated Annual Award for the portion of the year the employee was a Level II Participant and is eligible to receive a prorated Annual Award and related Deferred Award for the portion of the year the employee was a Level I Participant.
20192020 Annual Award (Paid in 2020)2021). The table below presents the incentive opportunity, earned, and deferred percentages of earned base salary for Level I Participants for the 20192020 Performance Period.
Total Incentive Opportunity
as % of Compensation
Total Incentive Earned and Vested at Year-EndTotal Incentive Deferred
for 3 Years
Total Incentive Opportunity
as % of Base Salary
Total Incentive Earned and Vested at Year EndTotal Incentive Deferred
for 3 Years
PositionPositionThresholdTargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximumPositionThresholdTargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximumThresholdTargetMaximum
CEOCEO50.0%  80.0%  100.0%  25.0%  40.0%  50.0%  25.0%  40.0%  50.0%  CEO50.0%80.0%100.0%25.0%40.0%50.0%25.0%40.0%50.0%
EVPEVP40.0%  60.0%  80.0%  20.0%  30.0%  40.0%  20.0%  30.0%  40.0%  EVP40.0%60.0%80.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%
SVPSVP35.0%  52.5%  70.0%  17.5%  26.25%  35.0%  17.5%  26.25%  35.0%  SVP35.0%52.5%70.0%17.5%26.25%35.0%17.5%26.25%35.0%


168182
Table of Contents


On January 25,November 15, 2019, the board of directors established Annual Award Performance Goals for 20192020 for Level I Participants relating to specific mission goals for profitability, MVE, member activity, ERM, minority and women inclusion, and compliancemarket risk management.excellence. The weights and specific achievement levels for each 20192020 mission goal are presented below.
2019 Mission GoalsWeighted ValuePerformance LevelsActual ResultAchievement PercentageWeighted Average Achievement
Bank (1)
ERM ThresholdTargetMaximum
Bank (1)
ERM
Profitability (2)
20%  15%  469 bps541 bps641 bpsbelow threshold0%  0%  0%  
Member Activity
A. Member Advances Growth (3)
20%  10%  0%  2.6%  4%  maximum  100%  20%  10%  
B. Member Education and Outreach (4)
15%  15%  15 events20 events25 eventsmaximum  100%  15%  15%  
C. PFI Concentration5%  5%  Top 5 MPP sellers will account for 65% or less of total purchases  Top 5 MPP sellers will account for 60% or less of total purchases  Top 5 MPP sellers will account for 57.5% or less of total purchases  maximum  100%  5%  5%  
D. CIP Advances Originated (5)
10%  5%  $50MM  $100MM  $200MM  maximum  100%  10%  5%  
ERM Objectives (6)
10%  30%  Achieve One ERM Objective  Achieve Two ERM Objectives  Achieve Three ERM Objectives  maximum  100%  10%  30%  
Minority and Women Inclusion
A. Presence (Inclusion Goal) Establishment of a bankwide Employee Resource Group (ERG)5%  5%  Framework to create an ERG  Identification of an ERG to be established within the Bank  Launch of an ERG  maximum  100%  5%  5%  
B. Performance (Diversity Goal) Portion of 2019 Vendor Spend with Qualifying Vendors (7)
5%  5%  15% Diverse Spend  17% Diverse Spend  19% Diverse Spend  maximum  100%  5%  5%  
Enhancement of Compliance Risk Management Function (8)
10%  10%  After the end of the Third Quarter and on or before the end of the Fourth Quarter  After the end of the Second Quarter and on or before the end of the Third Quarter  On or before the end of the Second Quarter  maximum  100%  10%  10%  
Total100%  100%  80%  85%  
2020 Mission GoalsWeighted ValuePerformance LevelsActual ResultAchievement PercentageWeighted Average Achievement
Bank (1)
ERM ThresholdTargetMaximum
Bank (1)
ERM
Profitability (2)
15 %10 %269 bps342 bps432 bps305 bps62%9.4 %6.2 %
Market Value of Equity (MVE) to Capital Stock (CS) (3)
10 %10 %110%130%160%141 %84%8.4 %8.4 %
Member Advances Growth (4)
10 %%0.5%1.0%3.0%Maximum100%10.0 %5.0 %
Member Education and Outreach (5)
10 %%40% of All MembersAchieve Threshold and 75% of Tier 1 MembersAchieve Target and 50% of Tier 2 MembersMaximum100%10.0 %5.0 %
Recruit new and/or reactivate Participating Financial Institutions into the Bank's MPP (6)
%%3 new or reactivated PFIs4 new or reactivated PFIs5 new or reactivated PFIsMaximum100%5.0 %5.0 %
CIP Advances Originated (7)
10 %%$37.5 MM$75 MM$150 MMMaximum100%10.0 %5.0 %
Market Risk Excellence (8)
10 %30 %See (8) belowSee (8) belowSee (8) belowMaximum100%10.0 %30.0 %
Promote inclusion within the organization through cultural awareness events/activities%%Host 2 events/activitiesHost 4 events/activitiesHost 6 events/activitiesMaximum100%5.0 %5.0 %
Increase Diverse Vendor pool (9)
%%16 new diverse suppliers (25% increase)24 new diverse suppliers (37.5% increase)33 new diverse suppliers (50% increase)Maximum100%5.0 %5.0 %
Transition to New Primary Data
Center (10)
10 %10 %Achieve Technical ReadinessComplete Threshold and Achieve Operational ReadinessComplete Target and Transition Site of RecordTarget75%7.5 %7.5 %
Implement Enterprise Content Management Platform (11)
10 %10 %Achieve Technical ReadinessComplete Threshold and Achieve Operational ReadinessComplete Target and Transition System of RecordMaximum100%10.0 %10.0 %
Total100%100%90.3%92.1%

(1)    For all Level I Participants, excluding those in ERM. "ERM" means the Bank's Enterprise Risk Management department.
(2)    For purposes of this goal, profitability is defined as the Bank’s profitability rate in excess of the Bank’s cost of funds rate. Profitability is the Bank’s adjusted net income reduced by the portion of net income to be added to restricted retained earnings under the JCE Agreement dated August 5, 2011, as amended, by and among the FHLBanksFederal Home Loan Banks and increased by the Bank’s accruals for incentive compensation net of the AHP assessment. Adjusted net income represents GAAP Net Income adjusted: (i) for the net impact of certain current and prior period advanceAdvance prepayments and debt extinguishments, net of the AHP assessment, (ii) to exclude mark-to-market adjustments on derivatives and certain other effects from derivatives and hedging activities, net of the AHP assessment, and (iii) to exclude the effects from interest expense on MRCS. The Bank’s profitability rate is profitability, as defined above, as a percentage of average total regulatory capital stock (B1 weighted at 100% and B2 weighted at 80% to reflect the relative weights of the Bank’s dividend). AssumesThis goal assumes no material change in investment authority under the Finance Agency'sFHFA's regulation, policy, directive, guidance, or law.
169183
Table of Contents


(3)The metric that will be used to determine performance on this goal will be the twelve (12) month simple average of the MVE to Book Value of Capital Stock ratio as reported in the monthly Market Risk Monitor Report.
(4)    Member advancesAdvances growth is calculated as the growth in the average daily balance of advancesAdvances outstanding to members at par. Average daily balances are used instead of point-in-time balances to eliminate point-in-time activity that may occur and to reward for the benefit of the income earned on advancesAdvances balances while outstanding. Advances to members that become non-members during 2019, Flagstar Bank, FSB2020 and all captive insurance company members will be excluded from the calculation. Goal assumes no material change in membership eligibility under the Finance Agency's regulation, policy, directive, guidance or law.
(4)(5)    Member education and outreach events arefor purposes of threshold achievement include symposia, conferences, workshops, webinars, (with a maximum of 2 webinars per agenda topic toward achievement of this goal), educational events, presentations at trade conferences, presentation to member Boards of Directors or Committees thereof or to management committees, in-person joint presentations to members (where a subject matter expert or senior officer of the Bank participates) and other events educating Bank members about advances,Advances, MPP, the Bank’s community investment products and activities, industry trends, and other products and services. To qualify,For purposes of Target and Maximum achievement, member education and outreach events must target more than 1include presentations to member Boards of Directors or committees thereof, presentations to member management committees or in-person joint presentations to members (where a subject matter expert or senior officer of the Bank participates) to discuss or educate regarding Advances, MPP, the Bank’s community investment products, industry trends or other products and services. Member tiers are defined by management based upon core business levels or the capacity to engage in core business with the exception of presentations to individual member Boards or committees thereof.Bank and are established annually. Status and reporting on this Goal and its attainment will be provided in writingsupported by the officer responsible for the event, andBank’s Customer Relationship Management (CRM) system. Achievement towards this goal will be confirmedcalculated by dividing the number of members that participated in one of the above events (defined as a member at the time of participation in the event) during the calendar year by the CFOtotal number of members of the Bank at December 31, 2020.
(6)    For purposes of this goal, in order for a PFI to qualify as a new or byreactivated PFI the CBOO.member either has never sold loans into the MPP or, as of their application for approval, has not settled a trade into the MPP within the past 24 months.
(5)(7)    "CIP" means Community Investment Program. CIP Advances are newly-originated Community Investment Cash Advances, including CIP and other qualifying Advances and CIP qualified letters of credit, provided in support of targeted projects as defined in 12 C.F.R. Part 1291 and the Bank Act.
(6)(8)    The Board has established 3 ERM ObjectivesPerformance Levels for 2019:Market Risk Excellence are:
Threshold: Enhance the existing assessment of market valuation assumptions for assets and liabilities while researching and reviewing valuation comparability with other FHLBanks.
Defined as written analysis, recommendations and implementation plan presented at Risk Committee.
Target: Complete Threshold and Execute Corporate Priority to support the transition of ERM's Market Risk Modeling from QRM to PolyPaths.
Defined as complete operational readiness for transition and submit documentation to a) Finance Agency for non-objection, and b) ERM Objective 1 – SystemicModel Risk Analysis – The Systemic Risk Analysis is comprised of two parts. In part 1, ERM isManagement Group for model validation. "Operational readiness" defined as being able to prepare a comprehensive retrospective analysis of the 2007-2009 Financial Crisis and report the results of the analysisgenerate market risk metrics that are reported to the Board. In part 2, ERM is to prepare a prospective analysis of the “Systemic Risk Exposure” of the FHLBank System.Finance Agency.
Maximum: Complete Target and ERM Objective 2 – Managing 21st Century PoliticalMarket Risk Analysisstaff will become proficient in the fundamentals of PolyPaths, including current Treasury Risk Analytics team EUCs, data extracts, and other related PolyPaths processes.
Defined as independent completion of market risk report by ERM following successful completion of Target goal. “Market risk reports” to be defined as reports on market value sensitivity.
(9)    – Prepare an analysis of"Increase Diverse Vendor Pool" means new registration(s) on the Bank’s political risk exposure using a framework adopted from the book entitled Political Risk: How Businesses and Organizations can Anticipate Insecurity. (Authors: Condoleezza Rice, ProfessorSupplier Registration Portal in 2020 of Economy, Stanford University and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution. Amy Zegart, Senior Fellow at Stanford University’s Center for International Security and Cooperation and Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution).
ERM Objective 3 – Mortgage Analysis Board Training – Provide the Board of Directors with a training session on mortgage valuation, funding, hedging, and portfolio management. Training will cover: Nominal Spread, Option Adjusted Spread, and Option Cost; Statistical Distribution of Option Adjusted Spread; Mortgage prepayment S-Curve basics; Non-path dependent options versus path-dependent options; Monte Carlo Simulation of Interest Rates; Portfolio Funding Hedging Optimization; Mortgage Value-at-Risk (400 Scenarios 1979 to Present); Long-term Risk Profile – Value at Risk; Short-term Risk – 12 Month Rolling Interest Income.
(7) "Qualifying Vendors" are vendors that qualify as minorities, women, veterans, individuals with disabilities, and minority-, women-, veteran-, and disabled-owned businesses.businesses that were not previously registered.
(8)
184
Table of Contents


(10)    AchievementStatus and reporting of this goal, requiresand its attainment will be provided in writing to the BankInformation Technology Steering Committee. Threshold, Target, and Maximum performance achievement levels are as follows:
Technical Readiness: "Technical Readiness" is defined as the installation, configuration and readiness of technology installed at the new data center. The criteria and milestones to have developedachieve technical readiness will be reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Steering Committee.
Operational Readiness: "Operational Readiness" is defined as ensuring data replication is established across the primary and secondary data centers, and the bank can operate a compliance risk management policy, program, and framework to outline management and staff responsibility which includes the utilizationset of non-production systems out of the new data center. The criteria and milestones to achieve operational readiness will be reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Steering Committee.
Transition Site of Record: "Transition Site of Record" is defined as receiving Information Technology Steering Committee approval to transition the Bank’s eGRC application, Archer,primary data center from Woodfield Crossing to monitor compliance risk findings through the Issue Management module. Satisfactionnew co-location data center, after successfully achieving technical and operational readiness. The criteria and milestones to transition the site of record will be reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Steering Committee.
(11)    Status and reporting of this goal, and its attainment will be evidencedprovided in one or more reportswriting to the Bank’s Risk Committee, utilizingInformation Technology Steering Committee. Threshold, Target, and Maximum performance achievement levels are as follows:
Technical Readiness: "Technical readiness" is defined as the timelines noted inacquisition, and installation of an Enterprise Content Management (ECM) platform. The criteria and milestones to achieve technical readiness will be reviewed and approved by the Goals table shown aboveInformation Technology Steering Committee.
Operational Readiness: "Operational Readiness" is defined as the governance, training and operational activities required to determine performance resultssupport the operational of the new Enterprise Content Management platform. The criteria and milestones to achieve operational readiness will be reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Steering Committee.
Transition System of Record: "Transition System of Record" is defined as transitioning the system of record for purposes of this plan.electronic records from Oracle Universal Content Management (UCM) to the new Enterprise Content Management platform. The criteria and milestones to achieve the transition will be reviewed and approved by the Information Technology Steering Committee.

There is no guaranteed payout under the provisions of the 20192020 Incentive Plan. Therefore, the minimum that could be paid out to an NEO was $0. The maximum amounts that could have been earned under the 20192020 Incentive Plan for the Annual Award Performance Period are presented below. The actual amounts earned are also presented below and in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation table.
MaximumActualMaximumActual
NEONEOBase SalaryAnnual Award OpportunityWeighted Average AchievementAnnual AwardWeighted Average AchievementAnnual AwardNEOBase SalaryAnnual Award OpportunityWeighted Average AchievementAnnual Award
Weighted Average Achievement (1)
Annual Award
Cindy L. KonichCindy L. Konich$931,996  50%  100%  $465,998  80.0%  $372,798  Cindy L. Konich$996,867 50%100%$498,43491.4%$455,817 
Gregory L. Teare Gregory L. Teare  456,430  40%  100%  182,572  80.0%  146,058  Gregory L. Teare488,214 40%100%195,28690.3%176,265 
William D. Miller (2)William D. Miller (2) 398,840  40%  100%  159,536  85.0%  135,606  William D. Miller (2)422,469 40%100%168,98891.0%153,823 
Deron J. Streitenberger Deron J. Streitenberger  378,040  40%  100%  151,216  80.0%  120,973  Deron J. Streitenberger423,981 40%100%169,59290.3%153,074 
K. Lowell Short, Jr. K. Lowell Short, Jr.  338,572  35%  100%  118,500  80.0%  94,800  K. Lowell Short, Jr.362,151 35%100%126,75390.3%114,407 

(1)    Rounded to the nearest tenth of a percent.
(2)    Mr. Miller participated in the 2020 Incentive Plan using the goal weights for ERM employees for the portion of the year he served as CRO and using the weights for Bank employees for the portion of the year he served as Chief Economist. As a result, his Annual Award represents a pro-rata Award. The weighted average achievement for ERM was 92.1% whereas the weighted average achievement for the Bank was 90.3%.

170185
Table of Contents


20162017 Deferred Award (Paid in 2020)2021). Fifty percent of each Level I Participant's 20162017 Award ("20162017 Deferred Award") was deferred for a three-year period that ended December 31, 20192020 ("2017-20192018-2020 Deferral Performance Period"). The 20162017 Deferred Award became earned and vested on that date, subject to the achievement of specific Bank performance goals over the 2017-20192018-2020 Deferral Performance Period and other conditions described below. The performance goals for the 2017-20192018-2020 Deferral Performance Period Award are substantially similar to those established for the 2016-20182017-2019 Deferral Performance Period. The following table presents the performance goals for the 20162017 Deferred Award relating to our profitability, retained earnings and prudential management standards, together with actual results and specific achievement levels for each mission goal.
2017-2019 Mission Goals
Weighted Value (1)
Performance LevelsActual ResultAchievement %Weighted Average Achievement
 Threshold (2)
Target (2)
Maximum (2)
Profitability (3)
35%  25 bps50 bps150 bpsmaximum125%  44%  
Retained Earnings (4)
35%  3.5%  3.9%  4.3%  maximum125%  44%  
Prudential Standards30%  Achieve 1 Prudential Standard  (a) Achieve both Prudential Standards  maximum125%  37%  
Maintain a regulatory capital-to-assets ratio of at least 4.16% as measured on each quarter-end in 2017 through 2019.
Award to FHLBI members the annual AHP funding requirement in each plan year.
Total100%  125%  
2018-2020 Mission Goals
Weighted Value (1)
Performance LevelsActual ResultAchievement %Weighted Average Achievement
 Threshold (2)
Target (2)
Maximum (2)
Profitability (3)
35%25 bps50 bps150 bpsmaximum125%44%
Retained Earnings (4)
35%3.5%3.9%4.3%maximum125%44%
Prudential Standards (see below)30%Achieve 1 Prudential Standard(a)Achieve both Prudential Standardsmaximum125%37%
Prudential Standard 1: Maintain a regulatory capital-to-assets ratio of at least 4.16% as measured on each quarter-end in 2018 through 2020.
Prudential Standard 2: Award to FHLBI members the annual AHP funding requirement in each plan year.
Total100%125%

(1)    For Level I Participants.
(2)    Deferred Awards are subject to additional performance goals for the Deferral Performance Period. Depending on our performance during the Deferral Performance Period, the Final Award will be worth 75% at Threshold, 100% at Target or 125% at Maximum of the original amount.
(3)    For purposes of this goal, profitability is defined as the Bank's profitability rate in excess of the Bank's cost of funds rate. Profitability is the Bank's adjusted net income reduced by the portion of net income to be added to restricted retained earnings under the JCE Agreement and increased by the Bank's accruals for incentive compensation. Adjusted net income represents GAAP net income adjusted: (i) for the net impact of certain current and prior period advance prepayments and debt extinguishments, net of the related AHP assessment, (ii) to exclude mark-to-market adjustments and certain other effects from derivatives and hedging activities, net of the related AHP assessment, and (iii) to exclude the effects from interest expense on MRCS. The Bank's profitability rate, as defined above, as a percentage of average total regulatory capital stock (B1weighted(B1 weighted at 100% and B2 weighted at 80% to reflect the relative weights of the Bank's dividend). This goal assumes no material change in investment authority under the Finance Agency's regulation, policy, directive, guidance, or law. Attainment of this goal will be computed using the simple average of annual profitability measures over the three-year period.
(4)    Total retained earnings divided by mortgage assets, measured at the end of each month. Calculated each month as total retained earnings divided by the sum of the carrying value of the MBS and AMA assets portfolios. The calculation will be the simple average of 36 month-end calculations.
(a)    There is no target level for this goal.

Each NEO received at least the minimum required performance rating for each year of the 2017-20192018-2020 Deferral Performance Period and each was employed by the Bank on the last day of that period, thereby satisfying the two remaining conditions applicable to our NEOs for payment of the 20162017 Deferred Award.

171186
Table of Contents


The following table presents the payouts to the NEOs by applying the achievement levels described above to the performance goals in the 20162017 Deferred Award. These payouts are also presented in the Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation table.

20162017 Deferred Award - 2017-20192018-2020 Performance Period
NEONEOTotal Award for 2016Percentage Deferred
Deferred
Amount
Total Achievement
Deferred
 Award
NEOTotal Award for 2017Percentage Deferred
Deferred
Amount
Total AchievementDeferred
Award Paid in 2021
Cindy L. Konich Cindy L. Konich  $746,170  50%  $373,085  125%  $466,356  Cindy L. Konich$777,684 50%$388,842 125%$486,053 
Gregory L. Teare Gregory L. Teare  251,166  50%  125,583  125%  156,979  Gregory L. Teare307,554 50%153,777 125%192,221 
William D. Miller William D. Miller  217,340  50%  108,670  125%  135,837  William D. Miller265,786 50%132,893 125%166,116 
Deron J. Streitenberger Deron J. Streitenberger  212,136  50%  106,068  125%  132,586  Deron J. Streitenberger214,902 50%107,451 125%134,314 
K. Lowell Short, Jr. K. Lowell Short, Jr.  204,744  50%  102,372  125%  127,966  K. Lowell Short, Jr.205,416 50%102,708 125%128,385 

Other Incentive Plan Provisions. The Incentive Plan provides that a termination of service of a Level I Participant during a Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period may result in the forfeiture of the Participant's award. However, the Incentive Plan recognizes certain exceptions to this general rule if the termination of service is (i) due to the Level I Participant's death, "Disability," or "Retirement"; (ii) for "Good Reason"; or (iii) without "Cause" due to a "Reduction in Force" (in each case as defined in the Incentive Plan). If one of these exceptions applies, a Level I Participant's Annual Award or Deferred Awards generally will be treated as earned and vested, and will be calculated using certain assumptions with respect to our achievement of applicable performance goals for the applicable Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period. Additionally, payment of an award may be accelerated if the Participant dies or becomes "Disabled" while an employee of the Bank, or if the termination is without "Cause" due to a "Reduction in Force".

The Incentive Plan provides that awards may be reduced or forfeited in certain circumstances. If, during a Deferral Performance Period, we realize actual losses or other measures or aspects of performance related to the Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period that would have caused a reduction in the final award for the Performance Period or Deferral Performance Period, the remaining amount of the final award to be paid at the end of the Deferral Performance Period will be reduced to reflect this additional information. In addition, all or a portion of an award may be forfeited at the direction of the board of directors if we have failed to remediate to the satisfaction of the board an unsafe or unsound practice or condition (as identified by the Finance Agency) that is material to our financial operation and within the Level I Participant's area(s) of responsibility. Under such circumstances, the board may also direct the cessation of payments for a vested award. Further, the board may reduce or eliminate an award that is otherwise earned but not yet paid if the board finds that a serious, material safety-soundness problem or a serious, material risk management deficiency exists at our Bank, or in certain other circumstances.

Retirement Benefits. We maintain a comprehensive retirement program for our NEOs. During 2019,2020, certain of our NEOs were eligible to participate in our qualified (DB Plan) and non-qualified (SERP) defined benefit plans and all of our NEOs were eligible to participate in our qualified (DC Plan) and non-qualified (SETP) defined contribution plans. Those NEOs ineligible to participate in our DB Plan also received an additional non-elective contribution of 4% of their base salary per year to their DC Plan account. The benefits provided by these plans are components of the total compensation opportunity for NEOs. The board of directors believes these plans serve as valuable retention tools and provide significant tax deferral opportunities and resources for the participants' long-range financial planning. These plans are discussed below.

DB Plan and SERP. All employees who met the eligibility requirements and were hired before February 1, 2010 participate in the DB Plan, a tax-qualified, multiple employer defined benefit pension plan. The plan neither requires nor permits employee contributions. Participants' pension benefits vest upon completion of five years of service. Benefits under the DB Plan are based upon compensationcompensation up to the annual compensation limit established by the Internal Revenue Services ("IRS"), which was $280,000$285,000 in 2019.2020. In addition, benefits payable to participants in the DB Plan may not exceed a maximum benefit limit established by the IRS, which in 20192020 was $225,000,$230,000, payable as a single life annuity at normal retirement age.

172187
Table of Contents


In connection with the DB Plan, the board of directors established a supplemental non-qualified plan the SERP, in 1993 in response to federal legislation that imposesimposed restrictions on the retirement benefits otherwise earned by certain management or highly-compensated employees. The SERP is an extension of our retirement commitment to the NEO participants and certain other employees as highly-compensated employees. The SERPoriginal supplemental non-qualified plan was frozen effective December 31, 2004, and is now referred to as the "Frozen SERP." A separate SERP ("2005 SERP") was established effective January 1, 2005 to conform to IRC Section 409A requirements. The 2005SERP is an extension of our retirement commitment to the NEO participants and certain highly-compensated employees. The SERP restores the full pension benefits of NEO participants and certain other employees under the DB Plan that would otherwise be limited by IRS regulations regarding compensation, years of service or benefits payable. The DB Plan and 2005 SERP provide benefits based on a combination of a participant's length of service, age and annual compensation. In determining whether a participant is entitled to a restoration of retirement benefits, the 2005 SERP utilizes the identical benefit formula applicable to the DB Plan. Benefits payable under the 2005 SERP are reduced by (among other things) benefit amounts that would have been payable under the Frozen SERP, calculated as if the participant in the Frozen SERP had terminated employment on December 31, 2004. Frozen SERP and 2005 SERP benefits are funded by a grantor trust we have established as part of the Bank's general assets. The assets of the grantor trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors. Any rights created under the Frozen SERP and 2005 SERP are unsecured contractual rights of the participants against the Bank.

Our board of directors amended the DB Plan, effective for all employees hired on or after July 1, 2008, to provide a reduced benefit. All eligible employees hired on or before June 30, 2008 were grandfathered under the benefit formula and the terms of the DB Plan in effect as of June 30, 2008 ("Grandfathered DB Plan") and are eligible to continue under the Grandfathered DB Plan, subject to future plan amendments made by the board of directors. All eligible employees hired on or after July 1, 2008 but before February 1, 2010 are enrolled in the amended DB Plan ("Amended DB Plan"). As shown below in the Pension Benefits Table, as of December 31, 2019,2020, three NEOs participate in either the Grandfathered DB Plan or the Amended DB Plan and are eligible to participate in the 2005 SERP.

During 2010, our board of directors discontinued eligibility in the Amended DB Plan for new employees. As a result, no employee hired on or after February 1, 2010 is enrolled in that plan, while participants in the Grandfathered DB Plan or Amended DB Plan as of January 31, 2010 continue to be eligible for the Grandfathered DB Plan or Amended DB Plan (and, as applicable, the 2005 SERP) and accrue benefits thereunder until termination of employment.

The following sections describe the differences in the benefits provided under these plans.

Grandfathered DB Plan. The following table shows estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at age 65 by combining the Grandfathered DB Plan and the 2005 SERP. The estimated annual benefits are calculated in accordance with the formula currently in effect for specified years of service and compensation for individuals participating in both plans, and hired prior to July 1, 2008.
 Sample High 3-Year Average CompensationAnnual Benefits Payable at age 65 Based on Years of Benefit Service
3540
$1,200,000$1,050,000  $1,200,000  
1,300,000  1,137,500  1,300,000  
 Sample High 3-Consecutive-Year Average CompensationAnnual Benefits Payable at age 65 Based on Years of Benefit Service
3540
$1,300,000$1,137,500 $1,300,000 
1,400,0001,225,000 1,400,000 
1,500,0001,312,500 1,500,000 
 
Formula: The combined Grandfathered DB Plan and SERP benefit equals 2.5% times years of benefit service times the high three-yearthree-consecutive-year average compensation. Benefit service begins one year after employment, and benefits are vested after five years. Benefit payments commencing before age 65 are reduced by applying an early retirement factor based on the participant's age when payments begin. The allowance payable at age 65 would be reduced by 3.0% for each year the employee is under age 65. However, if the sum of age and years of vesting service at termination of employment is at least 70 ("Rule of 70"), the retirement allowance would be reduced by 1.5% for each year the employee is under age 65. Beginning at age 66, retirees are also provided an annual retiree cost of living adjustment of 3.0% per year, which is not reflected in the table.


173188
Table of Contents


Amended DB Plan. The following table shows estimated annual benefits payable upon retirement at age 65 by combining the Amended DB Plan and the 2005 SERP. The estimated annual benefits are calculated in accordance with the formula currently in effect for specified years of service and compensation for individuals participating in both plans, hired on or after July 1, 2008 but before February 1, 2010. 
Sample High 5-Year Average CompensationAnnual Benefits Payable at age 65 Based on Years of Benefit Service
101520
Sample High 5-Consecutive-Year Average Compensation Sample High 5-Consecutive-Year Average CompensationAnnual Benefits Payable at age 65 Based on Years of Benefit Service
101520
$400,000$400,000$60,000  $90,000  $120,000  $400,000$60,000 $90,000 $120,000 
500,000500,00075,000  112,500  150,000  500,00075,000 112,500 150,000 
600,000600,00090,000  135,000  180,000  600,00090,000 135,000 180,000 

Formula: The combined Amended DB Plan and 2005 SERP benefit equals 1.5% times years of benefit service times the high five-yearfive-consecutive-year average compensation. Benefit service begins 1 year after employment, and benefits are vested after five years. The allowance payable at age 65 would be reduced according to the actuarial equivalent based on actual age when early retirement commences. Benefit payments commencing before age 65 are reduced by applying an early retirement factor based on the participant's age when payments begin. If a participant satisfied the Rule of 70 at termination of employment, the retirement allowance would be reduced by 3.0% for each year the participant is under age 65.
 
The following table sets forth a comparison of the Grandfathered DB Plan and the Amended DB Plan. 

 DB Plan Provisions Grandfathered DB Plan
(All Employees Hired on or before June 30, 2008)
 Amended DB Plan
(All Employees Hired between July 1, 2008 and January 31, 2010)
Benefit Increment2.5%1.5%
Cost of Living Adjustment3.0% Per Year Cumulative, Commencing at Age 66None
Normal Form of PaymentGuaranteed 12 Year PayoutLife Annuity
Early Retirement Reduction for less than Age 65:
 (i) Rule of 701.5% Per Year3.0% Per Year
(ii) Rule of 70 Not Met3.0% Per YearActuarial Equivalent

With respect to all employees hired before February 1, 2010:

Eligible compensation includes salary (before any employee contributions to tax qualified plans), short-term incentive, bonus (including Annual Awards under the Incentive Plan), and any other compensation that is reflected on the IRS Form W-2 (but not including long-term incentive payments, such as Deferred Awards under the Incentive Plan).
Retirement benefits from the DB Plan are paid in the form of a lump sum, annuity, or a combination of the two, at the election of the retiree at the time of retirement. Any payments involving a lump sum are subject to spousal consent.
Retirement benefits from the 2005 SERP may be paid in the form of a lump sum payment, or annual installments up to 20 years, or a combination of lump sum and annual payments.

DC Plans and SETP. The Bank participated in the Pentegra Defined Contribution Retirement Savings Plan for Financial Institutions, as amended, a multiple employer retirement savings plan qualified under IRC Section 401(k), through October 1, 2020. Effective October 2, 2020, the Bank adopted the Federal Home Loan Bank of Indianapolis Retirement Savings Plan, which is a single employer retirement savings plan qualified under IRC Section 401(k). The terms of such plans are substantially the same and SETP. are collectively referred to as the "DC Plan."

All employees, including the NEOs, who have met the eligibility requirements may participate in the DC Plan, a retirement savings plan qualified under IRC Section 401(k).Plan. The DC Plan generally provides for an immediate (after the first month of hire) fully vested employer match of 100% on the first 6% of base paysalary that the participant contributes.



174189
Table of Contents


Eligible compensation in the DC Plan is defined as base salary. A participant in the DC Plan may elect to contribute up to 50% of eligible compensation, subject to the following limits. Under IRS regulations,regulations, in 20192020 an employee could contribute up to $19,000$19,500 of eligible compensation on a pre-tax basis, and an employee age 50 or over could contribute up to an additional $6,000$6,500 on a pre-tax basis. Participant contributions over that amount may be made on an after-tax basis. A total of $56,000$57,000 per year ($62,000($63,500 per year including catch-up contributions for employees age 50 or over) could have been contributed to a participant'sparticipant's account in 2019,2020, including our matching contribution and the participant's pre-tax and after-tax contributions. In addition, no more than $280,000$285,000 of annual compensation could have been taken into account in computing eligible compensation in 2019.2020. The amount deferred on a pre-tax basis will beis taxed to the participant as ordinary income when distributed from the DC Plan. The plan permits participants to self-direct the investment of their DC Plan accountsaccount into one or more investment funds. All returns are at the market rate of the respective fund(s) selectedselected by the participant.

The DC Plan also permits a participant (in addition to making pre-tax elective deferrals) to fund a separate "Roth Elective Deferral Account" (also known as a "Roth 401(k)") with after-tax contributions. A participant may make both pre-tax and Roth 401(k) contributions, subject to the limitations described in the preceding paragraph. All Bank contributions will beare allocated to the participant's safe-harbor 401(k)DC Plan account, subject to the maximum match amount described above. Under current IRS rules, withdrawals from a Roth 401(k) account (including investment gains) are tax-free after the participant reaches age 59 1/2 and if the withdrawal occurs at least five years after January 1 of the first year in which a contribution to the Roth 401(k) account occurs. In addition, the DC Plan permits in-plan Roth conversions, which allow participants to convert certain vested contributions into Roth contributions, similar to a Roth Individual Retirement Account conversion.

In November 2017,Effective January 1, 2018, the board of directors approved an amendment toestablished, within the DC Plan, effective January 1, 2018, to establish an employer-funded non-elective contribution ("NEC") program. This plan amendment ("The NEC Amendment") provides an additional employer-funded benefit for certain DC Plan participants, including two of our NEOs, who were hired on or after February 1, 2010 and therefore do not participate in the Grandfathered DB Plan or the Amended DB Plan. Under the NEC Amendment, theTthe Bank will makemakes an additional NECNEC of 4% of base paysalary per year to the DC Plan account of each employee who is eligible to participate in the DC Plan and does not participate in the DB Plan.NEC. The NEC Amendment establishesis subject to a vesting schedule for NECs based on an employee'sa participant's years of service at the Bank. Partial vesting begins when an eligible employeea participant has attained at least two years of service. Eligible employeesParticipants become fully vested in their NECs when they have attained five years of service. Both NEOs who participate inreceive the NEC program are fully vested.

In November 2015, the board of directors established the SETP, effective January 1, 2016. As described below, the purpose of the SETP is to permit the NEOs and certain other employees to elect to defer compensation in addition to theircompensation deferred under the DC Plan deferrals.Plan. The DC Plan and SETP provide benefits based upon amounts deferred by the participant and employer matching contributions based upon the amount of the participant's deferral and compensation.employer-matching contributions.

Each DC Plan participant who is an officer with a title of First Vice President or highermore senior (which includes all NEOs) is automatically eligible to become a SETP participant. In addition, the board of directors in its discretion may designate other DC Plan participants as eligible for SETP participation.to participate. The SETP constitutes a nonqualified deferred compensation arrangement that complies with IRC Section 409A regulations. The SETPregulations and permits a participant to elect to have all or a portion of his or hersuch participant's base salary and/or annual incentive plan payment withheld and credited to the participant's deferral contributionSETP account. The SETP provides that,Under this plan, subject to certain limitations, the Bank will contribute to the participant's account each plan year, up to the contribution that would have been made for the benefit of the participant under the DC Plan, including, if applicable, the NECs described above, as if the participant did not participate in the SETP and without regard to benefit or compensation limits imposed by the IRC. The plan permits participants to self-direct the investment of their deferred contributionSETP account into one or more investment funds. All returns are at the market rate of the respective fund(s) selected by the participant. SETPPlan benefits are paid out of an investment account established for each participant under a grantor trust that we have established as part of our general assets. The assets of the grantor trust are subject to the claims of our general creditors. The trust will be maintained such that the SETP is at all times considered unfunded and constitutes a mere promise by the Bank to make SETP benefit payments in the future. Any rights created under the SETPthis plan are unsecured contractual rights against the Bank.

The DB Plan, the 2005 SERP, the DC Plan and the SETP have all been amended and restated from time to time to comply with changes in laws and IRS regulations and to clarify or modify other benefit features.

175190
Table of Contents


Perquisites and Other Benefits. We offer the following additional perquisites and other benefits to all employees, including the NEOs, under the same general terms and conditions:
 
medical, dental, and vision insurance (subject to employee expense sharing);
vacation leave, which increases based upon officer title and years of service;
life and long-term disability insurance (the CEO and the CFO are eligible for enhanced monthly benefits under our disability insurance program);
travel and accident insurance, as well as kidnappingspecial crime coverage, which include life insurance benefits;
educational assistance;
employee relocation assistance, where appropriate, for new hires; and
student loan repayment assistance.

In addition, we provide as a taxable benefit to the NEOs and certain other officers spouse/guest travel to board of directors meetings and preapproved industry activities (limited to two events per year unless otherwise approved by the President - CEO, or by the Chief Internal Audit Officer in the case of the President - CEO).
 
Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control.

Severance Pay Plan. The board of directors has adopted a Severance Pay Plan that pays each NEO, upon a qualifying termination as described below (or in the Bank's discretion on a case-by-case basis), up to a maximum 52 weeks of base paysalary computed at the rate of 4 weeks of severance pay for each year of service with a minimum of 8 weeks of base paysalary to be paid. In addition, the plan pays a lump sum amount equal to the NEO's cost to maintain health insurance coverage under thea Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act ("COBRA")-like coverage for the time period applicable under the severance pay schedule. The Severance Pay Plan may be amended or eliminated by the board at any time. Receipt of benefits under the Severance Pay Plan is conditioned on the execution of a binding separation contract.

The Severance Pay Plan does not apply to NEOs who have entered into a KESA with the Bank or who are participants under the Bank's KESP if a qualifying event has triggered payment under the terms of the KESA or the KESP. As of the date of this Report,Form 10-K, Ms. Konich is the only NEO with whom we have a KESA; all other NEOs are participants under the KESP. If any NEO's employment is terminated, but a qualifying event under the KESA or the KESP, as applicable, has not occurred, the provisions of the Severance Pay Plan apply.

The following qualifying events will trigger an NEO's right to severance benefits under the Severance Pay Plan:
 
the elimination of a job or position;
a reduction in force;
a substantial job modification, to the extent the incumbent NEO is no longer qualified for, or is unable to perform, the restructured job; or
the reassignment of staff requiring the relocation by more than 75 miles of the NEO's primary residence.residence; or
termination of employment in connection with a reorganization, merger or other change of control of the Bank.

In addition, the Bank has discretion under the Severance Pay Plan to provide additional pay or outplacement services to amicably resolve employment separations involving our NEOs and other employees.

The following table lists the amounts that would have been payable to the NEOs under the Severance Pay Plan if triggered as of December 31, 2019,2020, absent a qualifying event that would result in payments under Ms. Konich's KESA or the KESP.
Months ofCost ofWeeks ofCost ofTotal
NEOCOBRACOBRASalarySalarySeverance
Cindy L. Konich  12$27,234  52$931,996  $959,230  
Gregory L. Teare   1219,168  48421,320  440,488  
William D. Miller  96,555  36276,120  282,675  
Deron J. Streitenberger  715,887  28203,560  219,447  
K. Lowell Short, Jr.  1117,571  44286,484  304,055  

Months ofCost ofWeeks ofCost ofTotal
NEOCOBRACOBRASalarySalarySeverance
Cindy L. Konich12$23,232 52$959,946 $983,178 
Gregory L. Teare1216,328 52470,132 486,460 
William D. Miller106,212 40312,940 319,152 
Deron J. Streitenberger815,488 32251,248 266,736 
K. Lowell Short, Jr.1216,328 48321,912 338,240 


176191
Table of Contents


The amounts listed above do not include payments and benefits to the extent that they are provided on a nondiscriminatory basis to NEOs generally upon termination of employment. These payments and benefits include:
 
accrued salary and vacation pay;
distribution of benefits under the DB Plan; and
distribution of plan balances under the DC Plan.

Similarly, the amounts listed above also do not include payments from the SERP or the SETP. Amounts payable from the SERP may be found in the Pension Benefits Table. Account balances for the SETP may be found in the Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Table.

Key Employee Severance Agreement and Key Employee Severance Policy. In general, key employee severance arrangements are intended to promote retention of certain officers in the event of discussions concerning a possible reorganization or change in control of the Bank, to ensure that merger or reorganization opportunities are evaluated objectively, and to provide compensation and other benefits to covered employees under certain circumstances in the event of a consolidation, change in control or reorganization of the Bank. As described in the following paragraphs, these arrangements provide for payment and, in some cases, continued and/or increased benefits if the officer's employment terminates under certain circumstances in connection with a reorganization, merger or other change in control of the Bank. If we were not in compliance with all applicable regulatory capital or regulatory leverage requirements at the time payment under the KESA or KESP becomes due, or if the payment would cause our Bank to fall below applicable regulatory requirements, the payment would be deferred until such time as we achieve compliance with such requirements. Moreover, if we were insolvent, have had a receiver or conservator appointed, or were in "troubled condition" at the time payment under an arrangement becomes due, the Finance Agency could deem such a payment to be subject to its rules limiting golden parachute payments.

Key Employee Severance Agreement. Ms. Konich's KESA was entered into during 2007. Under the terms of her agreement, Ms. Konich is entitled to a lump sum payment equal to a multiplier of her three preceding calendar years':

base salary (less salary deferrals), bonus, and other cash compensation;
salary deferrals and employer matching contributions under the DC Plan and SETP; and
taxable portion of automobile allowance, if any.

Ms. Konich is entitled to a multiplier of 2.99, if she terminates for "good reason" or is terminated "without cause" during a period beginning 12 months before and ending 24 months after a reorganization. This agreement also provides that benefits payable to Ms. Konich pursuant to the SERP would be calculated as if she were three years older and had three more years of benefit service. The agreement with Ms. Konich also provides her with coverage for 36 months under our medical and dental insurance plans in effect at the time of termination (subject to her payment of the employee portion of the cost of such coverage).

We do not believe payments to Ms. Konich under the KESA would be subject to the restriction on change-in-control payments under IRC Section 280G or the excise tax applicable to excess change-in-control payments, because we are exempt from these requirements as a tax-exempt instrumentality of the United States government. If it were determined, however, that Ms. Konich is liable for such excise tax payment, the agreement provides for a "gross-up" of the benefits to cover such excise tax payment. This gross-up of approximately $3.4$3.5 million is not shown as a component of the value of the KESA in the table below.

Further, the agreement with Ms. Konich provides that she will be reimbursed for all reasonable accounting, legal, financial advisory and actuarial fees and expenses she incurs with respect to execution of the agreement or at the time of payment under the agreement. The agreement also provides that Ms. Konich will be reimbursed for all reasonable legal fees and expenses she incurs if we contest the enforceability of the KESA or the calculation of the amounts payable under the agreement, so long as she is wholly or partially successful on the merits or the parties agree to a settlement of the dispute.

177192
Table of Contents


If a reorganization of our Bank had triggered payments under Ms. Konich's KESA on December 31, 2019,2020, the value of the payments for her would have been approximately as follows:
BenefitValue
2.99 times average of the 3 prior calendar years base salary, bonuses and other cash compensation paid to the executive except for salary deferrals which are included below$4,554,5574,952,591 
2.99 times average of the executive's salary deferrals and employer matching contributions under the DC Plan and SETP for the 3 prior calendar years390,093412,091 
Additional amount under the SERP equal to the additional benefit calculated as if the executive were 3 years older and had 3 more years of credited service2,519,1702,451,213 
Medical and dental insurance coverage for 36 months55,87268,328 
Reimbursement of reasonable accounting, legal, financial advisory, and actuarial services (1)
15,000 
Total value of KESA$7,534,6927,899,223 

(1)    The amount of $15,000 for reimbursement of reasonable accounting, legal, financial advisory, and actuarial services is an estimate and does not represent a minimum or maximum amount that could be paid.

Key Employee Severance Policy. On November 15, 2019,20, 2020, the board of directors re-adopted the KESP, which establishes three participation levels for covered employees: (i) Level 1 Participants, which include any Executive Vice President, (ii) Level 2 Participants, which include any Senior Vice President, and (iii) Level 3 Participants, which include any other officer designated by the HR Committee to be a Level 3 Participant from time to time. Thus, covered executives under the KESP (as of the date of filing of this report)Form 10-K) include all NEOs other than Ms. Konich. Mr. Teare Mr. Streitenberger and Mr. MillerStreitenberger are Level 1 Participants, Mr. Miller was a Level 1 Participant, and Mr. Short is a Level 2 Participant.

Under the KESP, if the covered employee terminates for "good reason" or is terminated without "cause," in either case within six months before or 24 months after a reorganization, the covered employee is entitled to a lump-sum payment equal to a multiple (2.0 for Level 1 Participants, 1.5 for Level 2 Participants and 1.0 for Level 3 Participants) of the average of his or her three preceding calendar years' base salary (inclusive of amounts deferred under a qualified or nonqualified plan) and gross bonus (inclusive of amounts deferred under a qualified or nonqualified plan); provided that, for any calendar year in which the covered employee received base salary for less than the entire year, the gross amount shall be annualized as if such amount had been payable for the entire calendar year. All amounts payable under the KESP are capped at an amount equal to one dollar ($1) less than the aggregate amount which would otherwise cause any such payments to be considered a “parachute payment” within the meaning of Section 280G of the IRC.

In addition, to the extent the covered employee is eligible, he or she will continue after a compensated termination to be covered by the Bank’s medical and dental insurance plans in effect immediately prior to the compensated termination, subject to the covered employee’s payment of the employee’s portion of the cost of such continued coverage. The coverage will continue for Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 Participants for 24 months, 18 months and 12 months, respectively. In the event the covered employee is ineligible under the terms of such plans for continuing coverage or such plans shall have been modified, the Bank will provide through other sources coverage which is substantially equivalent to the coverage provided immediately prior to the compensated termination, subject to the covered employee’s payment of a comparable portion of the cost of such continued coverage as under the Bank’s medical and dental insurance plans. The KESP also provides for outplacement services for all covered employees.

178193
Table of Contents


Summary Compensation Table
Name and Principal PositionName and Principal PositionYear
Salary
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (1)
Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (2)
All Other Compensation (3)(4)
TotalName and Principal PositionYear
Salary (1)
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation (2)
Change in Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings (3)
All Other Compensation (4)
Total
Cindy L. Konich
President - CEO (PEO)
Cindy L. Konich
President - CEO (PEO)
2019$931,996  $839,154  $5,665,000  $69,610  $7,505,760  Cindy L. Konich
President - CEO (PEO)
2020$996,867 $941,870 $4,616,000 $61,878 $6,616,615 
2018887,614  792,565  979,000  53,257  2,712,436  Cindy L. Konich
President - CEO (PEO)
2019931,996 839,154 5,665,000 69,610 7,505,760 
2017829,530  765,447  3,980,000  49,772  5,624,749  2018887,614 792,565 979,000 53,257 2,712,436 
Gregory L. Teare
EVP - CFO (PFO)
Gregory L. Teare
EVP - CFO (PFO)
2019456,430  303,037  368,000  28,353  1,155,820  Gregory L. Teare
EVP - CFO (PFO)
2020488,214 368,486 301,000 30,509 1,188,209 
2018430,586  293,358  178,000  25,835  927,779  Gregory L. Teare
EVP - CFO (PFO)
2019456,430 303,037 368,000 28,353 1,155,820 
2017410,072  266,778  234,000  24,604  935,454  2018430,586 293,358 178,000 25,835 927,779 
William D. Miller
EVP - CRCO
2019398,840  271,443  —  27,964  698,247  
2018365,898  255,384  —  34,028  655,310  
2017345,176  255,334  —  —  600,510  
William D. Miller (5)
EVP - Chief Economist
William D. Miller (5)
EVP - Chief Economist
2020422,469 319,939 — 43,049 785,457 
2019398,840 271,443 — 27,964 698,247 
2018365,898 255,384 — 34,028 655,310 
Deron J. Streitenberger
EVP - CBOO
Deron J. Streitenberger
EVP - CBOO
2019378,040  253,559  —  28,959  660,558  Deron J. Streitenberger
EVP - CBOO
2020423,981 287,388 — 43,609 754,978 
2018340,574  224,067  —  27,500  592,141  Deron J. Streitenberger
EVP - CBOO
2019378,040 253,559 — 28,959 660,558 
2017327,470  107,451  —  16,200  451,121  2018340,574 224,067 — 27,500 592,141 
K. Lowell Short, Jr.
SVP - CAO
K. Lowell Short, Jr.
SVP - CAO
2019338,572  222,766  223,000  21,256  805,594  K. Lowell Short, Jr.
SVP - CAO
2020362,151 242,792 223,000 22,878 850,821 
2018325,546  218,274  77,000  19,533  640,353  K. Lowell Short, Jr.
SVP - CAO
2019338,572 222,766 223,000 21,256 805,594 
2017313,014  215,953  137,000  18,781  684,748  2018325,546 218,274 77,000 19,533 640,353 

(1)    Salary reflects 27 biweekly pay periods for 2020 and 26 biweekly pay periods for 2019 and 2018.
(2)    The Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation table below presents the components of the "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" column and the dates that these amounts were paid.
(2)(3)    These amounts represent a change in pension value under the Grandfathered DB Plan, Amended DB Plan and the SERP, as applicable. The change in pension values are determined by calculating the present values of pension benefits accrued through the beginning and ending plan valuation dates. The calculations incorporate various assumptions and changes in compensation, age and tenure, and utilize discount interest rates based on market interest rates. Therefore, changes in market interest rates can have a significant impactimpact on the change in pension value. As noted under the Pension Benefits Table, theThe discount rates used for 20192020 were significantly lower by 70 bps and 101 bps than those used for 2018,2019 for the DB Plan and the SERP, respectively, which resulted in significant increases in pension values in 2019.2020. No portion of this change in pension value is realizable until a qualifying event occurs, such as retirement, and therefore, no portion of this change in pension value has been paid or made available to any of the NEOs. No NEO received preferential or above-market earnings on deferred compensation.
(3)(4)    Includes contributions to the DC Plan, NEC program, and the SETP, as applicable, for Ms. Konich ($55,920)59,804), Mr. Teare ($27,386)29,284), Mr. Miller ($26,998)41,818), Mr. Streitenberger ($28,000)42,396), and Mr. Short ($20,314)21,729). For Ms. Konich, alsoAlso includes $10,912 of perquisites and other personal benefits comprised of supplemental long-term disability insurance premium, a cash award for years of service (available to all employees upon attainment of certain service thresholds), and a nominal gift card provided as a holiday gift to all employees in the same amount. None of the other NEOs received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits.
(4)Includes life insurance policy premiums and income tax gross-ups provided to all employees related to holidaya stipend to defray work-from-home expenses, gift cards, and years of service awards, as applicable. ThereNone of the NEOs received more than $10,000 in perquisites or other personal benefits and there were no other perquisites or benefits that are available to the NEOs that are not available to all other employees.
(5)    Mr. Miller's employment with the Bank ceased effective February 19, 2021.


179
194
Table of Contents


Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
Annual AwardDeferred AwardTotal Non-EquityAnnual AwardDeferred AwardTotal Non-Equity
NameNameYear
Amounts Earned
Date Paid
Amounts Earned (1)
Date Paid
Incentive Plan
Compensation
NameYear
Amounts Earned
Date Paid
Amounts Earned (1)
Date PaidIncentive Plan
Compensation
Cindy L. KonichCindy L. Konich2019$372,798  3/6/2020$466,356  3/6/2020$839,154  Cindy L. Konich2020$455,817 3/5/2021$486,053 3/5/2021$941,870 
2018442,121  3/1/2019350,444  3/1/2019792,565  2019372,798 3/6/2020466,356 3/6/2020839,154 
2017388,842  2/23/2018376,605  2/23/2018765,447  2018442,121 3/1/2019350,444 3/1/2019792,565 
Gregory L. TeareGregory L. Teare2019146,058  3/6/2020156,979  3/6/2020303,037  Gregory L. Teare2020176,265 3/5/2021192,221 3/5/2021368,486 
2018171,425  3/1/2019121,933  3/1/2019293,358  2019146,058 3/6/2020156,979 3/6/2020303,037 
2017153,777  2/23/2018113,001  2/23/2018266,778  2018171,425 3/1/2019121,933 3/1/2019293,358 
William D. Miller (2)
William D. Miller (2)
2019135,606  3/6/2020135,837  3/6/2020271,443  
William D. Miller (2)
2020153,823 3/5/2021166,116 3/5/2021319,939 
2018145,847  3/1/2019109,537  3/1/2019255,384  2019135,606 3/6/2020135,837 3/6/2020271,443 
2017132,893  2/23/2018122,441  2/23/2018255,334  2018145,847 3/1/2019109,537 3/1/2019255,384 
Deron J. StreitenbergerDeron J. Streitenberger2019120,973  3/6/2020132,586  3/6/2020253,559  Deron J. Streitenberger2020153,074 3/5/2021134,314 3/5/2021287,388 
2018118,641  3/1/2019105,426  3/1/2019224,067  2019120,973 3/6/2020132,586 3/6/2020253,559 
2017107,451  2/23/2018(a) (a)107,451  2018118,641 3/1/2019105,426 3/1/2019224,067 
K. Lowell Short, Jr. (3)
K. Lowell Short, Jr. (3)
201994,800  N/A127,966  3/6/2020222,766  
K. Lowell Short, Jr. (3)
2020114,407 N/A128,385 3/5/2021242,792 
2018113,406  N/A104,868  N/A218,274  201994,800 N/A127,966 3/6/2020222,766 
2017102,708  N/A113,245  N/A215,953  2018113,406 N/A104,868 N/A218,274 

(1)    Amounts earned in 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018 represent the 2017, 2016, 2015, and 20142015 Deferred Awards, respectively.
(2)    Mr. Miller elected to defer 5% of his 2019 Annual Award pursuant to the SETP. The amounts not deferred were paid on the date indicated.
(3)    Mr. Short elected to defer 100% of his 2020, 2019, 2018, and 20172018 Annual Awards, and 80% and 100% of his 20152017 and 20142015 Deferred Awards payable in 20192021 and 2018,2019, respectively, pursuant to the terms of the SETP.
(a) Mr. Streitenberger was not a Level I participant in the Incentive Plan when the 2014 Deferred Awards were made.




180195
Table of Contents


Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table for 2019 2020
Estimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive PlansEstimated Future Payouts Under Non-Equity Incentive Plans
NameNamePlan NameGrant Date
Threshold (1) (2)
TargetMaximumNamePlan NameGrant Date
Threshold (1) (2)
TargetMaximum
Cindy L. Konich Cindy L. Konich  Incentive Plan - Annual  1/25/2019$11,650  $372,798  $465,998  Cindy L. KonichIncentive Plan - Annual11/15/19$12,461 $398,747 $498,434 
Incentive Plan - Deferred  1/25/2019279,599  372,798  465,998  Incentive Plan - Deferred11/15/19341,863 455,817 569,772 
Gregory L. Teare Gregory L. Teare  Incentive Plan - Annual  1/25/20194,564  136,929  182,572  Gregory L. TeareIncentive Plan - Annual11/15/194,882 146,464 195,286 
Incentive Plan - Deferred  1/25/2019109,543  146,058  182,572  Incentive Plan - Deferred11/15/19132,199 176,265 220,331 
William D. Miller William D. Miller  Incentive Plan - Annual  1/25/20193,988  119,652  159,536  William D. MillerIncentive Plan - Annual11/15/194,225 126,741 168,988 
Incentive Plan - Deferred  1/25/2019101,704  135,606  169,507  Incentive Plan - Deferred11/15/19115,367 153,823 192,278 
Deron J. Streitenberger Deron J. Streitenberger  Incentive Plan - Annual  1/25/20193,780  113,412  151,216  Deron J. StreitenbergerIncentive Plan - Annual11/15/194,240 127,194 169,592 
Incentive Plan - Deferred  1/25/201990,730  120,973  151,216  Incentive Plan - Deferred11/15/19114,806 153,074 191,343 
K. Lowell Short, Jr. K. Lowell Short, Jr.  Incentive Plan - Annual  1/25/20192,963  88,875  118,500  K. Lowell Short, Jr.Incentive Plan - Annual11/15/193,169 95,065 126,753 
Incentive Plan - Deferred  1/25/201971,100  94,800  118,500  Incentive Plan - Deferred11/15/1985,805 114,407 143,009 

(1)The Incentive Plan - Annual threshold payout is the amount expected to be paid when meeting the threshold for the smallest weighted of the nine componentseleven components of the 20192020 Annual Award Performance Period Goals. If the threshold for the smallest weighted of the nineeleven components was achieved, but the threshold for all of the other components was not reached, the payout would be 2.50% of the maximum Annual Award for each of the NEOs (1.25% x earned base salary for Ms. Konich, 1.00% x earned base salary for Mr. Teare, 1.00% x base salary for Mr. Miller, and1.00% x base salary for Mr. Streitenberger, and 0.88% x earned base salary for Mr. Short). There waswas no guaranteed payout under the 20192020 Annual Award provisions of the Incentive Plan. Therefore, the minimum that could be paid out under this plan is $0 for each NEO.
(2)The Incentive Plan - Deferred threshold payout is based upon the amount earned under the Incentive Plan - Annual and is further dependent on attaining the threshold over the three-year deferral period (2020-2022)(2021-2023). The threshold is the amount expected to be paid when meeting the threshold for achievement under the Deferred Award provisions of the Incentive Plan over the three-year period. Depending on our performance during the Deferral Performance Period, the Final Award will be worth 75% at Threshold, 100% at Target or 125% at Maximum of the original amount of the Deferred Award (from the 20192020 Incentive Plan - Annual Award Performance Period table previously presented). There is no guaranteed payout under the Deferred Award provisions of the Incentive Plan. Therefore, the minimum that could be paid out to an NEO under this plan is $0.

The Non-Equity Incentive PlanPlan Compensation - 20192020 table previously presented shows the amounts actually earned and paid under the 20192020 Annual Award provisions of the Incentive Plan.Plan.

Pension Benefits Table
Name (1)
Name (1)
Plan Name
Number of Years of Credited Service (2)
Present Value of Accumulated BenefitsPayments During Last Fiscal Year
Name (1)
Plan Name
Number of Years of Credited Service (2)
Present Value of Accumulated BenefitsPayments During Last Fiscal Year
Cindy L. Konich (3)Cindy L. Konich (3) DB Plan  35$2,983,000  $—  Cindy L. Konich (3)DB Plan36$3,226,000 $— 
SERP  3520,447,000  —  SERP3624,820,000 — 
Gregory L. Teare (3)(4)
Gregory L. Teare (3)(4)
DB Plan  17829,000  —  
Gregory L. Teare (3)(4)
DB Plan18941,000 — 
SERP  11671,000  —  SERP12860,000 — 
K. Lowell Short, Jr. (5)K. Lowell Short, Jr. (5) DB Plan  9532,000  —  K. Lowell Short, Jr. (5)DB Plan10674,000 — 
SERP  9300,000  —  SERP10381,000 — 

(1)    Mr. Streitenberger is not eligible, and Mr. Miller and Mr. Streitenberger arewas not eligible, to participate in the DB Plan or the SERP.
(2)    For each of the NEOs, the years of credited service have been rounded to the nearest whole year.
(3)Ms. Konich is eligible to retire under the DB Plan and SERP due to the combination of her age and years of credited service.
(4)    Mr. Teare earned six years of credited service in the DB Plan as an employee of the FHLBank of Seattle.Seattle and is eligible to retire under the DB Plan and SERP.
(5)    Mr. Short is eligible to retire under the DB Plan and SERP due to the combination of his age and years of credited service.


196
Table of Contents


Pension values are determined by calculating the present values of pension benefits accrued through the plan valuation dates. The calculations incorporate various assumptions and changes in compensation, age and service, and utilize discount interest rates based on market interest rates. The present value of the accumulated benefits is based upon a retirement age of 65, using the PRI-2012 white collar worker annuitant tables (with Scale MP-2019)MP-2020), a discount rate of 3.22%2.52% for the DB Plan, and a discount rate of 2.55%1.54% for the SERP for 2019, compared to 4.22% and 3.64%, respectively, for 2018.SERP. The discount rates for the DB Plan and the SERP are based on the Financial Times Stock Exchange ("FTSE") Group Pension Liability Index and the FTSE Group Pension Discount Curve, respectively, both of which are determined by yields on high-quality corporate bonds at the valuation dates.

181
Table of Contents


Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation - 20192020
NameName
Executive Contributions in Last FY (1)
Bank Contributions in Last FY (2)
Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY (3)
Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions in Last FY
Aggregate Balance at
Last FYE (4)
Name
NEO Contributions in Last FY (1)
Bank Contributions in Last FY (2)
Aggregate Earnings
in Last FY (3)
Aggregate Withdrawals / Distributions in Last FY
Aggregate Balance at
Last FYE (4)
Cindy L. Konich Cindy L. Konich  $55,920  $39,120  $92,765  $—  $448,069  Cindy L. Konich$59,812 $42,704 $104,976 $— $655,561 
Gregory L. Teare Gregory L. Teare  63,900  10,586  16,924  —  196,603  Gregory L. Teare68,350 12,184 26,092 — 303,229 
William D. Miller William D. Miller  —  4,754  24,387  —  105,860  William D. Miller55,819 29,995 40,685 — 232,359 
Deron J. StreitenbergerDeron J. Streitenberger4,240 13,896 1,611 — 19,746 
K. Lowell Short, Jr. K. Lowell Short, Jr.  233,793  5,055  47,038  —  625,492  K. Lowell Short, Jr.118,729 5,260 49,501 — 798,982 

(1)    The contributions by Ms. Konich, Mr. Teare, and Mr. MillerStreitenberger are included in the "Salary" reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019.2020. Of the contributions by Mr. Short, $23,700Miller, $42,247 are included in the "Salary" reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019.2020. The remaining $210,093$13,572 of contributions by Mr. Miller reflect the amounts deferred related to the 2019 Annual Award reported as "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table for 2019. Of the contributions by Mr. Short, $25,303 are included in the "Salary" reported in the Summary Compensation Table for 2020. The remaining $93,426 of contributions by Mr. Short reflect the amounts deferred related to the 20182019 Annual Award and the 2015 Deferred Award that are reported as "Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table for 2018.2019.
(2)    The amounts in this column are included as a component of "All Other Compensation" in the Summary Compensation Table. The amounts include the Bank's matching contributions for Mr. Miller of $16,678 and Mr. Short of $631 on their contributions to the SETP that were eligible for matching contributions if deferred under the DC Plan, resulting in total Bank contributions of 6% of their base salaries. In addition, the amounts for Mr. Miller and Mr. Streitenberger include the portion of the NEC in excess of the IRS limit applicable to the DC Plan.
(3)    The amountsamounts reported in this column are not reported in the Summary Compensation Table because these amounts are not above market or preferential.
(4)    The amounts reported in this column have been reported in the Summary Compensation Table either in 20192020 or prior years, with the exception of aggregate earnings.

The SETP is described in more detail above in "Retirement Benefits - DC Plan and SETP." Participants in the SETP elect the timing of distribution of their benefits; provided, however, that a participant is permitted to withdraw all or a portion of the amount in his or her account, in a single lump sum, if the participant has experienced an unforeseeable emergency (as defined by the SETP and determined by an administrative committee appointed by our board) or in certain other, limited circumstances. None of the NEOs made a withdrawal or received a distribution from the SETP during 2019.2020.


197
Table of Contents


Principal Executive Officer Pay Ratio Disclosure

Our President - CEO is our PEO. As described below, for the year ended December 31, 2019,2020, we determined the ratio of the total compensation, as determined in the Summary Compensation Table ("Total Compensation"), of our PEO to the Total Compensation of the Bank's median employee.

Total Compensation includes, among other components, amounts attributable to changes in pension value under the Bank's Grandfathered DB Plan, Amended DB Plan and the SERP, as applicable. Such change in pension value represents the difference between the present value of pension benefits accrued through the beginning valuation date and the present value of pension benefits accrued through the ending valuation date. The present value calculations incorporate many assumptions and utilize discount rates based on market interest rates. Therefore, changes in market interest rates can have a significant impact on the change in pension value. The discount rates used as of December 31, 20192020 were significantly lower than the discount rates used as of December 31, 2018,2019, which caused a significant increase in the change in pension values for 2019.2020. Additionally, the change in pension value varies considerably among employees based upon their tenure at the Bank, their annual compensation and several other factors. Finally, no portion of this change in pension value has been paid or made available to the PEO or median employee; in fact, no portion is realizable until a qualifying event occurs, such as retirement.

For 2019,2020, the Total Compensation of the PEO was $7,505,760.$6,616,615. As of December 31, 2019,2020, our PEO had 3536 years of credited service under the Grandfathered DB Plan and SERP. Her Total Compensation therefore includes the change in the present value of her pension benefits, which amounted to $5,665,000,$4,616,000, and constituted 75%70% of her reported 20192020 Total Compensation. Excluding the 20192020 change in pension value, the PEO’s Total Compensation was $1,840,760.$2,000,616.

We determined that, during 2019, there were no changes in our employee population or employee compensation arrangements that we believe would result in a significant change to our pay ratio disclosure. Therefore, as permittedAs required by SEC rules, we are using the samereevaluated our employees to identify a new median employee thatfor our pay ratio disclosures in 2020. As a result of this review, we initiallyselected a different employee than was originally identified forwith our 2017 calculations.

We As in 2017, we identified the median employee by first determining the total of salary, wages, bonuses (if any) and incentive awards (collectively, "cash compensation") for each of the full-time and part-time employees of our Bank on the last pay date of 20172020 and annualizing the cash compensation of those who were not employed by the Bank for all of 2017.2020. We then ranked the 20172020 annual cash compensation for all such employees from lowest to highest, excluding the PEO.

182
Table of Contents


There were two employeeswas one employee at the median based on cash compensation, but neither participatesthat employee does not participate in a pension plan. We therefore selected as the median employee the individual who participates in the same plan as our PEO (the Grandfathered DB Plan), and whose 20172020 annual cash compensation was closest to that of the actual median employees.employee. We made no other material assumptions or adjustments in identifying the median employee. This approach ensures that the median employee's Total Compensation, like the PEO's Total Compensation, includes a change in pension value and thereby provides an appropriate comparison. We then calculated the median employee's Total Compensation in the same manner that we calculated Total Compensation for the PEO.

For 2019,2020, the Total Compensation of the median employee was $264,216.$289,153. As of December 31, 2019,2020, our median employee had eleventhirteen years of credited service in the DB Plan. The median employee's Total Compensation includes a change in the present value of pension benefits of $130,000.$156,000. As a result, the ratio of the PEO’s Total Compensation to that of the median employee was 28:23:1. Excluding the 20192020 changes in pension value from the Total Compensation of both the PEO and the median employee, the ratio was 14:115:1.
.

198
Table of Contents


Director Compensation

Finance Agency regulations provide that each FHLBank may pay its directors reasonable compensation for the time required of them and their necessary expenses in the performance of their duties, as determined by a compensation policy to be adopted annually by the FHLBank's board of directors. The Finance Agency Director annually reviews the compensation and expenses of FHLBank directors and has the authority to determine that the compensation and/or expenses paid to directors are not reasonable. In such case, the Director could order the FHLBank to refrain from making any further payments; however, such an order would only be applied prospectively and would not affect any compensation earned but unpaid or expenses incurred but not yet reimbursed.

20192020 Compensation. In September 2018,2019, after considering McLagan market data research and a director fee comparison among the FHLBanks, the board of directors adopted a director compensation and expense reimbursement policy for 20192020 ("20192020 Policy"). Under the 20192020 Policy, each director had an opportunity to earn an annual fee (divided into quarterly payments), subject to the combined fee limit shown below. The fees are intended to reflect the time required of directors in the performance of official Bank and board business, measured principally by meeting attendance thresholds and participation at board and committee meetings and secondarily by performance of other duties, which include:

preparing for board and committee meetings;
chairing meetings as appropriate;
reviewing materials sent to directors on a periodic basis;
attending other related events such as management conferences, FHLBank System meetings, director training and new director orientation; and
fulfilling the responsibilities of directors.

Additional compensation is paid for serving as chair or vice chair of the board of directors or as chair of a board committee. Because we are a cooperative and only member institutions may own our stock, no director may receive equity-based compensation. The 20192020 Policy provides that director fees were to be paid at the end of each quarter.

The 20192020 Policy authorizes a reduction of a director’s fourth quarterly payment if a majority of disinterested directors determines that such director’s performance, ethical conduct or attendance is significantly deficient. No such reductions occurred for 2019.2020.

183
Table of Contents


The following table summarizes the annual fee limits of the 20192020 Policy as approved by the board of directors.
PositionAnnual
Fee Limit
Chair$132,500137,000 
Vice Chair119,000123,000 
Audit Committee Chair118,000122,000 
Affordable Housing Committee Chair113,000117,000 
Finance/Budget Committee Chair113,000117,000 
Human Resources Committee Chair113,000117,000 
Risk Oversight Committee Chair113,000117,000 
Technology Committee Chair113,000117,000 
All other directors103,000107,000 
Other Committee Chair(a)

(a)    Directors serving as Chair of newly-formed Committees, or serving as Chair of an additional Committee, are entitled to an additional $10,000 fee per year, prorated by the number of quarters for which the director served as Chair. During 2020, the Board established a Special Committee that operated during two quarters, therefore its Chair received an additional $5,000 fee.

199
Table of Contents


Director Compensation Table for 20192020
NameName
Fees Earned or
Paid-in Cash
TotalName
Fees Earned or
Paid-in Cash
Total
Brian D. J. BoikeBrian D. J. Boike$107,000 107,000 
Jonathan P. BradfordJonathan P. Bradford$103,000  $103,000  Jonathan P. Bradford107,000 107,000 
Ronald BrownRonald Brown103,000  103,000  Ronald Brown107,000 107,000 
Charlotte C. DeckerCharlotte C. Decker103,000  103,000  Charlotte C. Decker117,000 117,000 
Robert M. FisherRobert M. Fisher103,000  103,000  Robert M. Fisher107,000 107,000 
Karen F. GregersonKaren F. Gregerson113,000  113,000  Karen F. Gregerson117,000 117,000 
Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.103,000  103,000  Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.107,000 107,000 
Jeffrey G. JacksonJeffrey G. Jackson103,000  103,000  Jeffrey G. Jackson107,000 107,000 
Carl E. LiedholmCarl E. Liedholm113,000  113,000  Carl E. Liedholm117,000 117,000 
James L. Logue IIIJames L. Logue III119,000  119,000  James L. Logue III123,000 123,000 
Robert D. LongRobert D. Long118,000  118,000  Robert D. Long122,000 122,000 
Michael J. ManicaMichael J. Manica103,000  103,000  Michael J. Manica107,000 107,000 
Dan L. MooreDan L. Moore132,500  132,500  Dan L. Moore137,000 137,000 
Larry W. MyersLarry W. Myers103,000  103,000  Larry W. Myers107,000 107,000 
Christine Coady NarayananChristine Coady Narayanan113,000  113,000  Christine Coady Narayanan117,000 117,000 
John L. Skibski113,000  113,000  
Larry A. SwankLarry A. Swank113,000  113,000  Larry A. Swank117,000 117,000 
Ryan M. WarnerRyan M. Warner103,000  103,000  Ryan M. Warner112,000 112,000 

We provide various travel, accident, and kidnapping insurance coverages for all of our directors, officers and employees. These policies provide a life insurance benefit in the event of death within the scope of the policy. We also reimburse directors or directly pay for reasonable travel and related expenses in accordance with the director compensation and travel reimbursement policy.
Directors' Deferred Compensation Plan. In 2015, we established the DDCP, effective January 1, 2016. The DDCP permits members of our board of directors to elect to defer all or a portion of the fees payable to them for a calendar year for their services as directors. The DDCP constitutes a deferred compensation arrangement that complies with Section 409A of the IRC, as amended. Any duly elected and serving member of our board may become a participant in the DDCP. The DDCP has been amended and restated effective January 1, 2021 to increase flexibility as to when distributions may be made.

All contributions credited to a participant’s account will be invested in an irrevocable grantor trust established to provide for the Plan’sDDCP's benefits. The DDCP is administered by an administrative committee appointed by our board, currently the HR Committee. The trust will be maintained such that the DDCP at all times for income tax purposes will be unfunded and constitutes a mere promise by the Bank to make DDCP benefit payments in the future. Any rights created under the DDCP are unsecured contractual rights against the Bank. The Bank establishes an investment account for each participant under the trust, which at all times remains an asset of the Bank, subject to claims of the Bank’s general creditors. The DDCP permits participants to allocate their investment account among investment options established by the HR Committee or the board. No above-market or preferential earnings are paid on any balances under the DDCP. In general, a participant may elect to have his or her deferred compensation paid in a single lump sum payment, in annual installment payments over a period of two to five years, or in a combination of both such methods.

184200
Table of Contents


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our Class B common stock as of February 29, 2020,28, 2021, by each shareholder that beneficially owned more than 5% of the outstanding shares. Each shareholder named (with its parent holding company) has sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned.

Name and Address of ShareholderName and Address of ShareholderNumber of Shares Owned% Outstanding SharesName and Address of ShareholderNumber of Shares Owned% Outstanding Shares
Flagstar Bank, FSB - 5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, MIFlagstar Bank, FSB - 5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, MI3,025,028  13.0 %Flagstar Bank, FSB - 5151 Corporate Drive, Troy, MI3,767,546 15.4 %
The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company - 1300 S Clinton Street, Fort Wayne, INThe Lincoln National Life Insurance Company - 1300 S Clinton Street, Fort Wayne, IN1,723,500  7.4 %The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company - 1300 S Clinton Street, Fort Wayne, IN1,948,500 8.0 %
TCF National Bank - 2508 South Louise Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD (1)
TCF National Bank - 2508 South Louise Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD (1)
1,488,477  6.4 %
TCF National Bank - 2508 South Louise Avenue, Sioux Falls, SD (1)
1,488,477 6.1 %
Jackson National Life Insurance Company - 1 Corporate Way, Lansing, MIJackson National Life Insurance Company - 1 Corporate Way, Lansing, MI1,253,921  5.4 %Jackson National Life Insurance Company - 1 Corporate Way, Lansing, MI1,253,921 5.1 %
TotalTotal7,490,926  32.2 %Total8,458,444 34.6 %

(1)TCF National Bank, as successor by merger to Chemical Bank, is a non-member shareholder.

The majority of our directors are officers and/or directors of our financial institution members. The following table sets forth the financial institution members that have an officer and/or director serving on our board of directors as of February 29, 2020.28, 2021.
Director NameDirector NameName of MemberNumber of Shares Owned by Member% of Outstanding SharesDirector NameName of MemberNumber of Shares Owned by Member% of Outstanding Shares
Brian D. J. Boike Brian D. J. Boike  Flagstar Bank, FSB  3,025,028  13.02 %Brian D. J. BoikeFlagstar Bank, FSB3,767,546 15.41 %
Ronald Brown Ronald Brown  United Fidelity Bank, FSB  62,019  0.27 %Ronald BrownUnited Fidelity Bank, FSB62,019 0.25 %
Clifford M. ClarkeClifford M. ClarkeThree Rivers Federal Credit Union85,200 0.35 %
Robert M. Fisher Robert M. Fisher  Lake-Osceola State Bank  13,501  0.06 %Robert M. FisherLake-Osceola State Bank13,501 0.06 %
Karen F. Gregerson Karen F. Gregerson  The Farmers Bank  17,325  0.07 %Karen F. GregersonThe Farmers Bank17,325 0.07 %
Jeffrey G. Jackson Jeffrey G. Jackson  Michigan State University Federal Credit Union  130,500  0.56 %Jeffrey G. JacksonMichigan State University Federal Credit Union137,250 0.56 %
Michael J. Manica Michael J. Manica  United Bank of Michigan  54,000  0.23 %Michael J. ManicaUnited Bank of Michigan54,000 0.22 %
Dan L. Moore Dan L. Moore  Home Bank SB  23,205  0.10 %Dan L. MooreHome Bank SB23,205 0.09 %
Larry W. Myers Larry W. Myers  First Savings Bank  141,445  0.61 %Larry W. MyersFirst Savings Bank177,309 0.73 %
Ryan M. Warner  The Bippus State Bank  7,875  0.03 %
TotalTotal3,474,898  14.95 %Total4,337,355 17.74 %


185
Table of Contents


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

We use acronyms and terms throughout this Item that are defined herein or in the Defined Terms.

Related Parties

We are a cooperative institution and owning shares of our Class B stock is generally a prerequisite to transacting business with us. As such, we are wholly-owned by financial institutions that are also our customers (with the exception of shares held by former members, or their legal successors, in the process of redemption). In addition, our directors may serve as officers and/or directors of our members, and we conduct our advances and AMA business almost exclusively with our members. Therefore, in the normal course of business, we extend credit to and purchase mortgage loans from members with officers or directors who may serve as our directors. However, such transactions are on substantially the same terms, including interest rates and collateral, as those prevailing at the time for comparable transactions with persons not related to our Bank (i.e., other members), and that do not involve more than the normal risk of collectability or present other unfavorable terms.

Also, in the normal course of business, some of our member directors and independent directors are officers of entities that may directly or indirectly participate in our AHP. All AHP transactions, however, including those involving (i) a member (or its affiliate) that owns more than 5% of the Bank's capital stock, (ii) a member with an officer or director who is a director of our Bank, or (iii) an entity with an officer, director or general partner who serves as a director of our Bank (and that has a direct or indirect interest in the AHP transaction), are subject to the same eligibility and other program criteria and requirements and the same Finance Agency regulations governing AHP operations.

201
Table of Contents


We do not extend credit to or conduct other business transactions with our directors, executive officers or any of our other officers or employees. Executive officers may obtain loans under certain employee benefit plans but only on the same terms and conditions as are applicable to all employees who participate in such plans.

Related Transactions

We have a Code of Conduct that requiresand Conflict of Interest Policy for Directors, a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy for Affordable Housing Advisory Council ("AHAC") Members, a Code of Conduct and Conflict of Interest Policy for Employees and Contractors, and a Code of Ethics for Senior Financial Officers. These codes require all directors, AHAC members, officers and employees to disclose any related party interests through ownership or family relationship. These disclosures are reviewed by our ethics officers and, where appropriate, our board of directors to determine the potential for a conflict of interest. The review is performed by our ethics officers for disclosures relating to officers and employees, and by our General Counsel and board of directors (or, when appropriate, the disinterested members of our board of directors) for directors and AHAC members. In the event of a conflict, appropriate action is taken, which may include: recusal of a director from the discussion and vote on a transaction in which the director has a related interest; removal of an employee from a project with a related party vendor; disqualification of related vendors from transacting business with us; or requiring directors, officers or employees to divest their ownership interest in a related party.party; or removal of an AHAC member. The Corporate SecretaryGeneral Counsel and ethics officers maintain records of all related party disclosures, and there have been no transactions involving our directors, officers or employees that would be required to be disclosed herein.

Director Independence

General. As of the filing date of this Form 10-K, we have 17 directors: pursuant to the Bank Act, nine were elected or re-elected as member directors by our member institutions and eight were elected or re-elected as "independent directors" by our member institutions. None of our directors are "inside" directors, that is, none of our directors are employees or officers of our Bank. Further, our directors are prohibited from personally owning stock in our Bank. Each of the nine member directors, however, is a senior officer or director of an institution that is our member and is encouraged to engage in transactions with us on a regular basis.

Our board of directors is required to evaluate and report on the independence of our directors under two distinct director independence standards. First, Finance Agency regulations establish independence criteria for directors who serve as members of our Audit Committee. Second, SEC rules require that our board of directors apply the independence criteria of a national securities exchange or automated quotation system in assessing the independence of our directors.

186
Table of Contents


Finance Agency Regulations Regarding Independence. The Finance Agency director independence standards prohibit an individual from serving as a member of our Audit Committee if he or she has one or more disqualifying relationships with our Bank or our management that would interfere with the exercise of his or her independent judgment. Relationships considered to be disqualifying by our board of directors are: employment with us at any time during the last five years; acceptance of compensation from us other than for service as a director; serving as a consultant, advisor, promoter, underwriter or legal counsel for our Bank at any time within the last five years; and being an immediate family member of an individual who is or who has been an Executive Officer within the past five years. Our board of directors assesses the independence of each director under the Finance Agency's independence standards, regardless of whether he or she serves on the Audit Committee. As of the date of this Form 10-K, each of our directors is "independent" under these criteria relating to disqualifying relationships.

SEC Rules Regarding Independence. SEC rules require our board of directors to adopt a standard of independence with which to evaluate our directors. Pursuant thereto, our board adopted the independence standards of the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") to determine which of our directors are "independent," which members of our Audit Committee are not "independent," and whether our Audit Committee's financial expert is "independent."

As noted above, some of our directors who are "independent" (as defined in and for purposes of the Bank Act) are employed by companies that may from time to time have (or seek to have) limited business relationships with our Bank due to those companies' participation in projects funded in part through our AHP. None of those companies, however, has, or within the past three most recently completed fiscal years had a relationship with us that resulted in payments to, or receipts from, the Bank in excess of the limits set forth in the NYSE independence standards. Moreover, any business relationship between those directors' respective companies and the Bank is established and conducted on the same terms and conditions provided to similarly-situated third parties. After applying the NYSE independence standards, our board determined that, as of the date of this Form 10-K, our eight directors (Mses. Cook, Decker and Narayanan and Messrs. Bradford, Hannigan, Liedholm, Logue, Long, Sears and Swank) who are "independent" directors, as defined in and for purposes of the Bank Act, are also independent under the NYSE standards.

202
Table of Contents


Based upon the fact that each member director is a senior officer or director of an institution that is a member of our Bank (and thus the member is an equity holder in our Bank), that each such institution routinely engages in transactions with us (which may include advances, MPP and AHP transactions), and that such transactions occur frequently and are encouraged in the ordinary course of our business and our member institutions' respective businesses, our board of directors concluded for the present time that none of the member directors meet the independence criteria under the NYSE independence standards. It is possible that, under a strict reading of the NYSE objective criteria for independence (particularly the criterion regarding the amount of business conducted with our Bank by the director's institution), a member director could meet the independence standard on a particular day. However, because the amount of business conducted by a member director's institution may change frequently, and because we generally desire to increase the amount of business we conduct with each member institution, we believe it is inappropriate to draw distinctions among the member directors based upon the amount of business conducted with our Bank by any director's institution at a specific time.

Our board of directors has a standing Audit Committee comprised of eight directors (including the ex-officio member), sixfive of whom are member directors and twothree of whom are "independent" directors (according to Bank Act director classifications established by HERA). For the reasons noted above, our board of directors determined that none of the current member directors on our Audit Committee are "independent" under the NYSE standards for audit committee members. However, our board of directors determined that the independent director who serves as Chair of the Audit Committee and is one of the Bank's Audit Committee Financial Experts under SEC rules, due primarily to his previous experience as an audit partner at a major public accounting firm, is "independent" under the NYSE independence standards for Audit Committee members.

SEC Rule Regarding Audit Committee Independence. The Exchange Act, as amended by HERA, requires the FHLBanks to comply with the substantive Audit Committee director independence rules applicable to issuers of securities pursuant to the rules of the Exchange Act. Those rules provide that, to be considered an independent member of an Audit Committee, the director may not be an affiliated person of the Exchange Act registrant. The term "affiliated person" means a person that directly, or indirectly through one or more intermediaries, controls, or is controlled by, or is under common control with, the registrant. The rule provides a "safe harbor," whereby a person will not be deemed an affiliated person if the person is not the beneficial owner, directly or indirectly, of more than 10% of any class of voting securities of the registrant. All of our Audit Committee member directors' institutions presently meet this safe harbor.

187
Table of Contents


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

The following table sets forth the aggregate fees billed or to be billed for the years ended December 31, 20192020 and 20182019 by our independent registered public accounting firm, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP ($ amounts in thousands).
 20192018
Audit fees$821  $755  
Audit-related fees47  56  
Tax fees—  —  
All other fees  
Total fees$871  $814  

 20202019
Audit fees$812 $821 
Audit-related fees58 47 
Tax fees— — 
All other fees
Total fees$873 $871 

Audit fees were incurred for professional services rendered for the audits of our financial statements. Audit-related fees were incurred for certain FHLBank System assurance and related services, as well as fees related to PwC's participation at FHLBank conferences. All other fees were incurred for non-audit services for an annual license for PwC's disclosure software.

We are exempt from all federal, state, and local taxation, except employment and real estate taxes. Therefore, no fees were paid for tax services during the years presented.

Our Audit Committee has adopted Independent Accountant Pre-approval Policies and Procedures ("Pre-approval Policy"). In accordance with the Pre-approval Policy and applicable law, on an annual basis, the Audit Committee reviews the list of specific services and projected fees for services to be provided for the next 12 months by our independent registered public accounting firm and pre-approves audit services, audit-related services, tax services and non-audit services, as applicable. Pre-approvals are valid until the end of the next calendar year, unless the Audit Committee specifically provides otherwise.


203
Table of Contents


Under the Pre-approval Policy, the Audit Committee may delegate pre-approval authority to one or more of its members subject to a pre-approval fee limit. The Audit Committee has designated the Committee Chair as the member to whom such authority is delegated. Pre-approved actions by the Committee Chair as designee are reported to the Audit Committee at its next scheduled meeting. New services that have not been pre-approved by the Audit Committee that are in excess of the pre-approval fee level established by the Audit Committee must be presented to the entire Audit Committee for pre-approval.

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The exhibits to this Annual Report on Form 10-K are listed below.

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit NumberDescription
3.1*
3.2*
4.1*
4.24.2*
4.34.3*
4.4
10.1*+
188
Table of Contents


Exhibit NumberDescription
10.2*
10.3*
10.4*+
10.5*+
10.6*+
204
Table of Contents


Exhibit NumberDescription
10.7*+
10.6+ 10.8+
10.7*+ 
10.8*10.9*+
24 10.10*+
10.11+
24
31.1
31.2
31.3
32
101.INSXBRL Instance Document
101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document

* These documents are incorporated by reference.
+ Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.
189205
Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK OF INDIANAPOLIS

/s/ CINDY L. KONICH
Cindy L. Konich
President - Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: March 10, 20202021

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated below:
SignatureTitle Date
/s/ CINDY L. KONICHPresident - Chief Executive Officer March 10, 20202021
Cindy L. Konich
(Principal Executive Officer)
/s/ GREGORY L. TEAREExecutive Vice President - Chief Financial Officer March 10, 20202021
Gregory L. Teare
(Principal Financial Officer)
/s/ K. LOWELL SHORT, JR.Senior Vice President - Chief Accounting Officer March 10, 20202021
K. Lowell Short, Jr.
(Principal Accounting Officer)
/s/ DAN L. MOORE*Chair of the board of directors March 10, 20202021
Dan L. Moore
/s/ JAMES L. LOGUE III*KAREN F. GREGERSON*Vice Chair of the board of directors March 10, 20202021
James L. Logue IIIKaren F. Gregerson
/s/ BRIAN D.J. BOIKE*DirectorMarch 10, 20202021
Brian D. J.D.J. Boike
/s/ JONATHAN P. BRADFORD*DirectorMarch 10, 2020
Jonathan P. Bradford
/s/ RONALD BROWN*Director March 10, 20202021
Ronald Brown
/s/ CLIFFORD M. CLARKE*DirectorMarch 10, 2021
Clifford M. Clarke
/s/ LISA D. COOK*DirectorMarch 10, 2021
Lisa D. Cook
/s/ CHARLOTTE C. DECKER*Director March 10, 20202021
Charlotte C. Decker
/s/ ROBERT M. FISHER*DirectorMarch 10, 20202021
Robert M. Fisher
/s/ KAREN F. GREGERSON*DirectorMarch 10, 2020
Karen F. Gregerson

190206
Table of Contents



SignatureTitle Date
/s/ MICHAEL J. HANNIGAN, JR.*Director March 10, 20202021
Michael J. Hannigan, Jr.
/s/ JEFFREY G. JACKSON*Director March 10, 20202021
Jeffrey G. Jackson
/s/ CARL E. LIEDHOLM*JAMES L. LOGUE III*Director March 10, 20202021
Carl E. LiedholmJames L. Logue III
/s/ ROBERT D. LONG*DirectorMarch 10, 20202021
Robert D. Long
/s/ MICHAEL J. MANICA*DirectorMarch 10, 20202021
Michael J. Manica
/s/ LARRY W. MYERS*Director March 10, 20202021
Larry W. Myers
/s/ CHRISTINE COADY NARAYANAN*Director March 10, 20202021
Christine Coady Narayanan
/s/ TODD E. SEARS*DirectorMarch 10, 2021
Todd E. Sears
/s/ LARRY A. SWANK*Director March 10, 20202021
Larry A. Swank
/s/ RYAN M. WARNER*DirectorMarch 10, 2020
Ryan M. Warner


* By:/s/ K. LOWELL SHORT, JR.
K. Lowell Short, Jr., Attorney-In-Fact

191207
Table of Contents