UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172020
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
oTRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-32892
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware20-3547095
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
1200 Abernathy Road N.E.
Suite 1200
Atlanta, GA 30328
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)
Registrant’s telephone number: (770) 206-4200
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each ClassTrading SymbolName of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01MWANew York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes x No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulations S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) x Yes o No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.505 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one): x Large accelerated filer     o Accelerated filer o Non-accelerated filer     o Smaller reporting companyEmerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant had filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).   o Yes x No
There were 158,061,628158,102,357 shares of common stock of the registrant outstanding at November 17, 2017.10, 2020. At March 31, 2017,2020, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates (assuming only for purposes of this computation that directors and executive officers may be affiliates) was $1,856.5$1,248.3 million based on the closing price per share as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Applicable portions of the Proxy Statement for the upcoming 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders of the Company are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.





Introductory Note
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“annual report”), (1) the “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Mueller Water Products, Inc. and its subsidiaries (2) “Infrastructure” refers to our Infrastructure segment (previously reported as “Mueller Co.”); (3)“Technologies” “Technologies” refers to our Technologies segment (previously reported as “Mueller Technologies”); (4) “Anvil” refers to our former Anvil segment, which we sold on January 6, 2017; and (5) “U.S. Pipe” refers to our former U.S. Pipe segment, which we sold on April 1, 2012. With regard to the Company’s segments, “we,” “us” or “our” may also refer to the segment being discussed.
Certain of the titles and logos of our products referenced in this annual report are part of our intellectual property. Each trade name, trademark or service mark of any other company appearing in this annual report is the property of its owner.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, whenever we refer in this annual report to a particular year, we mean our fiscal year ended or ending September 30 in that particular calendar year. We manage our business and report operations through two business segments, Infrastructure and Technologies, based largely on the products they sell and the customers they serve.
Industry and Market Data
In this annual report, we rely on and refer to information and statistics from third-party sources regarding economic conditions and trends, the demand for our water infrastructure, flow control and other products and services and the competitive conditions we face in serving our customers and end users. We believe these sources of information and statistics are reasonably accurate, but we have not independently verified them.
Most of our primary competitors are not publicly traded companies. Only limited current public information is available with respect to the size of our end markets and our relative competitive position. Our statements in this annual report about our end markets and competitive positions are based on our beliefs, studies and judgments concerning industry trends.
Forward-Looking Statements
This annual report contains certain statements that may be deemed “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements that address activities, events or developments that we intend, expect, plan, project, design, believe or anticipate will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. Examples of forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements we make regarding our business strategy, capital allocation plans and expectations for net sales and operating income margins, and the outlook for general economic conditions, spending by municipalities and the residential and non-residential construction markets and the impacts of these factors on our business and our expected financial performance.Forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and assessments made by us in light of our experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions and expected future developments. Actual results and the timing of events may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to a number of factors, including regional, national or global political, economic, business, competitive, market and regulatory conditions and the other factors described under the section entitled “RISK FACTORS” in Item 1A of Part I of this annual report.
Undue reliance should not be placed on any forward-looking statements. We do not have any intention or obligation to update forward-looking statements, except as required by law.



Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements




TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Item 1.
Backlog
Regulatory and Environmental Matters
Securities Exchange Act Reports
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Item 1.
Regulatory and Environmental Matters
Securities Exchange Act Reports
Item 1A.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Seasonality
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9A.
Item 10*
Item 11*
Item 12*
Item 13*
Item 14*
Item 15
*All or a portion of the referenced section is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement that will be issued in connection with the upcoming 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.




Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



PART I
Item 1.BUSINESS
Item 1.BUSINESS
Our Company
Mueller Water Products, Inc. is a Delaware corporation that was incorporated on September 22, 2005 under the name Mueller Holding Company, Inc. On June 1, 2006, we completed an initial public offering of 28,750,000 shares of our common stock, and on December 14, 2006, Walter Industries, Inc., our parent company at that time, distributed to its shareholders 85,844,920 shares of our common stock to complete a spin-off of the Company.
On September 23, 2009, we completed a public offering of 37,122,000 shares of common stock.
On April 1, 2012, we sold U.S. Pipe.
On January 6, 2017, we sold Anvil. Anvil's results of operations and the gain from its sale have been classified as discontinued operations, and its assets and liabilities have been classified as held for sale, for all periods presented.
We are a leading manufacturer and marketer of products and services used in the transmission, distribution and measurement of water in North America. Our products and services are used by municipalities and the residential and non-residential construction industries. CertainSome of our products have leading positions due to their strong brand recognition and reputation for quality, service and innovation. We believe we have one of the largest installed bases of iron gate valves and fire hydrants in the United States. Our iron gate valve or fire hydrant products are specified for use in the largest 100 metropolitan areas in the United States. Our large installed base, broad product range and well-known brands have led to long-standing relationships with the key distributors and end users of our products. Our consolidated net sales were $826.0$964.1 million in 2017.2020.
We operate our business through two segments, Infrastructure, formerly referred to as Mueller Co., and Technologies, formerly referred to as Mueller Technologies. Segment sales, operating results and additional financial data and commentary are provided in the Segment Analysis section in Part II, Item 7. “MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” and in Note 16.17. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8. “FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA” of this annual report.
Infrastructure
Infrastructure manufactures valves for water and gas systems, including iron gate, butterfly, tapping, check, knife, plug, automatic control and ball valves, as well as dry-barrel and wet-barrel fire hydrants and a broad line of pipe repair products, such as clamps and couplings used to repair leaks. Infrastructure’s net sales were $739.9$885.5 million in 2017.2020. Sales of Infrastructure products are driven principally by spending on water and wastewater infrastructure upgrade, repair and replacement, and by construction of new water and wastewater infrastructure, which is typically associated with construction of new residential communities. Infrastructure sells its products primarily through waterworks distributors. We estimate approximately 60%believe a majority of Infrastructure’s 20172020 net sales were for infrastructure upgrade, repair and replacement. Infrastructure also sells products for pipe repair to natural gas utilities.
Technologies
Technologies offers residential and commercial water metering, water leak detection and pipe condition assessment products, systems and services. Technologies’ net sales were $86.1$78.6 million in 2017.2020. Technologies is comprised of the Mueller Systems and Echologics businesses. Mueller Systems sells water metering systems, products, services and servicessoftware directly to municipalities and to waterworks distributors. Echologics sells water leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services primarily to municipalities.

1

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Business Strategy
Our business strategy is to capitalize on the large, attractive and growing water infrastructure markets worldwide. Key elements of this strategy are as follows:
Realign our management and business processes to act as one company focused on the needs of our customers.
By centralizing common functions, integrating our information technology, and focusing management's attention on our customers and their needs, we expect to reduce operating costs, improve our responsiveness, and increase our net sales.
Accelerate development of new products.
We plan to make increasingcontinue to increase investments in our product development capabilities, including expanding our engineering staff, to develop and market new products and services. We expect to add new products to our portfolio and offer new products into different end markets. We expect this expansion to come through internal investments as well as acquisitions.
Develop and implement fully-integrated intelligent technology platform for infrastructure testing, monitoring and control.
We have introduced a new software platform, Sentryx, that provides data intelligence to help water utilities make strategic and operational decisions. As our customers seek to use real-time data and analytics to manage and repair their aging infrastructures more efficiently, we believe we are uniquely positioned to help solve their problems given our expertise and the large installed base of our products. This data includes leak detection, pressure monitoring, advanced metering and water quality, which are aggregated and consolidated within the Sentryx platform, providing utilities with critical information regarding their distribution systems.
1

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Drive operational excellence.
We are bringing best practices focused on Lean manufacturing with an investment mindset to deliver manufacturing productivity improvements.
By effectively deploying additional capital We expect these efforts will facilitate innovation and driving efficiencies innew product development, helping us drive sales growth and improve product margins. Productivity improvements at our manufacturing facilities we believe we can continueshould allow us to drive down the cost ofcosts, which can fund additional manufacturing our products. We plan to use a portion of the cost savings realized from improved productivity forinitiatives and continued investment in product development.
Implement a go-to-market strategy that leverages the scope of allModernize manufacturing facilities.
We are prioritizing capital investments through 2022 to modernize our productsmanufacturing facilities and services
processes. We plan to accelerate sales growth of our existing products by enhancing our relationships with our customersbelieve this modernization will improve product quality, drive non-price margin expansion and channel partners and realizing synergies amongexpand our product lines withportfolio. Our large valve manufacturing expansion in Chattanooga began ramping up production in 2020 and we expect to enter full-scale production in early 2021. We are in the process of building out our new facility in Kimball, Tennessee to expand our machining and assembly capabilities in the Chattanooga area. We expect these investments will allow us to capitalize on the growing need for large valves due to the migration to more densely populated, urban areas and an increased focus by customers on products made in America. In addition, we have begun construction of a unified sales and marketing strategy.new brass foundry in Decatur, Illinois.
Continue to seek to acquire and invest in businesses and technologies that expand our existing portfolio of businesses or that allow us to enter new marketsmarkets.
We will continue to evaluate the acquisition of strategic businesses, technologies and product lines that have the potential to strengthen our competitive positions, enhance or expand our existing product and service offerings, expand our technological capabilities, leverage our manufacturing capabilities, provide synergistic opportunities or that allow us to enter new markets.  As part of this strategy, we may pursue international opportunities, including acquisitions, joint ventures and partnerships, that allow us to expand product or service offerings or to enter new markets.
Description of Products and Services
We offer a broad line of water infrastructure, flow control, metrology and leak detection products and services primarily in the United States and Canada. Infrastructure sells water and gas valves, fire hydrants and fire hydrants.pipe repair products. Technologies sells water metering products and systems and leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services. Our products are designed, manufactured and tested in compliance with industry standards, where applicable.
Infrastructure
Infrastructure is comprised of companies that manufacture valves for water and gas systems, as well as fire hydrants and pipe repair products for water distribution.
Infrastructure’s water distribution products are manufactured to meet or exceed American Water Works Association (“AWWA”) Standards and, where applicable, certified to NSF/ANSI Standard 61 for potable water conveyance. In addition, Underwriters Laboratory (“UL”) and FM Approvals (“FM”) have approved many of these products. These products are typically specified by a water utility for use in its system.
Water and Gas Valves and Related Products.Infrastructure manufactures valves for water and gas systems, including iron gate, butterfly, tapping, check, knife, plug, automatic control and ball valves, and sells these products under a variety of brand names, including Mueller, Pratt, U.S. Pipe Valve and Hydrant, and Singer Valve. Water and gas valves and related products, generally made of iron or brass, accounted for $516.9$583.2 million, $504.8$576.4 million and $495.7$569.1 million of our gross sales in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. These valve products are used to control distribution and transmission of potable water, non-potable water or gas. Water valve products typically range in size from ¾ inch to 36 inches in diameter. Infrastructure also manufactures significantly larger valves as custom order work through its Henry Pratt business unit.product line. Most of these valves are used in water transmission or distribution, water treatment facilities or industrial applications.
Infrastructure also produces small valves, meter bars and line stopper fittings for use in gas systems, as well as machines and tools for tapping, drilling, extracting, installing and stopping-off, which are designed to work with its water and gas fittings and valves as an integrated system.

2

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Fire Hydrants.Infrastructure manufactures dry-barrel and wet-barrel fire hydrants. Sales of fire hydrants and fire hydrant parts accounted for $186.5$201.4 million, $184.9$199.7 million and $177.4$204.3 million of our gross sales in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Infrastructure sells fire hydrants for new water infrastructure development, fire protection systems and water infrastructure repair and replacement projects.
2

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

These fire hydrants consist of an upper barrel and nozzle section and a lower barrel and valve section that connects to a water main. In dry-barrel hydrants, the valve connecting the barrel of the hydrant to the water main is located below ground at or below the frost line, which keeps the upper barrel dry. Infrastructure sells dry-barrel fire hydrants under the Mueller and U.S. Pipe Valve and Hydrant brand names in the United States and the Canada Valve brand name in Canada. Infrastructure also makes wet-barrel hydrants, where the valves are located in the hydrant nozzles and the barrel contains water at all times. Wet-barrel hydrants are made for warm weather climates, such as in California and Hawaii, and are sold under the Jones brand name.
Most municipalities have approved a limited number of fire hydrant brands for installation within their systems due to their desiredesires to use the same tools and operating instructions across their systems and to minimize inventories of spare parts. We believe Infrastructure’s large installed base of fire hydrants throughout the United States and Canada, reputation for superior quality and performance and incumbent specification positions have contributed to the leading market positionsposition of its fire hydrants. This large installed base also leads to recurring sales of replacement hydrants and hydrant parts.
OtherRepair Products and Services. Infrastructure also sells pipe repair products, such as clampscouplings, grips and couplingsclamps used to repair leaks, under the HYMAX, Mueller and JonesKrausz brand names.
Technologies
Technologies is comprised of companies that provide innovative solutions, products and services that actively diagnose, measure and monitor the delivery of water.
Water Metering Products and Systems. Mueller Systems manufactures and sources a variety of water technology products under the Mueller Systems and Hersey brand names that are designed to help water providers accurately measure and control water usage. Mueller Systems offers a complete line of residential, fire line and commercial metering solutions. Residential and commercial water meters are generally classified as either manually read meters or remotely read meters via radio technology. A manually read meter consists of a water meter and a register that gives a visual meter reading display. Meters equipped with radio transmitters (endpoints) use encoder registers to convert the measurement data from the meter (mechanical or static) into an encrypted digital format which is then transmitted via radio frequency to a receiver that collects and formats the data appropriately for water utility billing systems. These remotely read or mobile, systems are either automatic meter reading (“AMR”) systems whereor fixed network advanced metering infrastructure (“AMI”) systems. With an AMR system, utility personnel with mobile equipment, for meter reading purposes, including a radio receiver, computer and reading software, collectscollect the data from utilities’ meters; or fixed network advanced metering infrastructure (“AMI”) systems, where data is gathered utilizingmeters. With an AMI system, a network of permanent data collectors or gateway receivers that are always active or listening for the radio transmission from the utilities’ meters.meters gather the data. AMI systems eliminate the need for utility personnel to travel through service territories to collect meter reading data. These systems provide the utilities with more frequent and diverse data at specified intervals from the utilities’ meters.meters and allow for two-way communication. Mueller Systems sells both AMR and AMI systems and related products. Mueller Systems’ remote disconnect water meter enables the water flow to be stopped and started remotely via handheld devices or from a central operating facility.
Sales of water metering products and systems accounted for 83%79%, 83%81% and 88%79% of Technologies’ net sales in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
Water Leak Detection and Pipe Condition Assessment Products and Services. Echologics develops technologies and offers products and services under the Echologics brand name that can non-invasively (without disrupting service or introducing a foreign object into the water system) detect underground leaks and assess the condition of water mains comprised of a variety of materials.  Echologics leverages its proprietary acoustic technology to offer leak detection and condition assessment surveys. Echologics also offers fixed leak detection systems that allow customers to continuously monitor and detect leaks on water distribution and transmission mains. We believe Echologics’ ability to offer accurate leak detection and pipe condition assessment services non-invasively is a key competitive advantage.
Manufacturing
See “Item 2. PROPERTIES” for a description of our principal manufacturing facilities.

3

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We will continue to expand the use of Lean manufacturing and Six Sigma business improvement methodologies where appropriate to safely capture higher levels of quality, service and operational efficiency in our manufacturing facilities in both segments.
3

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Infrastructure
Infrastructure operates twelvefourteen manufacturing facilities located in the United States, Canada, Israel and China. These manufacturing operations include foundry, machining, fabrication, assembly, testing and painting operations. Not all facilities perform each of these operations. Infrastructure’s existing manufacturing capacity is sufficient for anticipated near-term requirements. However, in order to meet longer-term capacity requirements and modernize some production facilities, Infrastructure has no current plansexpanded its large valve casting capabilities at its foundry location in Chattanooga, Tennessee, is currently building out its new manufacturing facility in nearby Kimball, Tennessee to expand capacity.insource certain activities and assemble certain large valves, and has started construction of a new brass foundry in Decatur, Illinois that will replace our existing brass foundry located nearby in Decatur.
Infrastructure foundries use both lost foam and green sand casting techniques. Infrastructure uses the lost foam technique for fire hydrant production in its Albertville, Alabama facility and for iron gate valve production in its Chattanooga, Tennessee facility. The lost foam technique has several advantages over the green sand technique for high-volume products, including a reduction in the number of manual finishing operations, lower scrap levels and the ability to reuse some of the materials.
Technologies
Mueller SystemsTechnologies operates one manufacturing facility in the United States and contracts with a manufacturing facility in Mexico. Mueller SystemsCertain Technologies products are also manufactured in facilities primarily dedicated to Infrastructure products. Technologies designs, manufactures and assembles water metering products in Cleveland, North Carolina, and designs and supports AMR and AMI systems in Middleborough, Massachusetts. Echologicsour research and development center of excellence for software and electronics in Atlanta, Georgia, and designs leak detection and condition assessment products in Toronto, Ontario.
Purchased Components and Raw Materials
Our products are made using various purchased components and several basic raw materials, including brass ingot, scrap steel, sand and resin. Purchased parts and raw materials represented 39%approximately 34% and 9%11%, respectively, of cost of sales in 2017.2020.
Patents, Licenses and Trademarks
We have active patents relating to the design of our products and trademarks for our brands and products. We have filed and continue to file, when appropriate, patent applications used in connection with our business and products. Many of the patents for technology underlying the majority of our products have been in the public domain for many years, and we do not believe third-party patents individually or in the aggregate are material to our business. However, we consider the pool of proprietary information, consisting of expertise and trade secrets relating to the design, manufacture and operation of our products to be particularly important and valuable. We generally own the rights to the products that we manufacture and sell, and we are not dependent in any material way upon any license or franchise to operate. See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-Any inability to protect our intellectual property or our failure to effectively defend against intellectual property infringement claims could adversely affect our competitive position.”
4

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

The table below highlights selected brand names by segment.
InfrastructureTechnologies
Canada Valve™Echologics®
Centurion®Echoshore®
Hydro Gate®Ez-Max®ePulse®
Hydro-Guard®Hydro Gate®Hersey™
Jones®Hydro-Guard®LeakFinderRT®
Milliken™HYMAX®LeakFinderST™
Mueller®HYMAX VERSA®LeakListener®
Singer™Jones®LeakTuner®
Pratt®Krausz®Mi.Echo®
Milliken™Mi.Data®
Mueller®Mi.Hydrant™
Pratt®Mi.Net®
Pratt Industrial®Mueller Systems®
Repamax®Sentryx™
Repaflex®
Singer™
U.S. Pipe Valve and Hydrant™Hydrant, LLCMi.Data®
Mi.Hydrant™
Mi.Net®
Mueller Systems®


4

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Seasonality
See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-Seasonal demand for certain of our products and services may adversely affect our financial results.” and “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS-Seasonality.”
Sales, Marketing and Distribution
We sell primarily to distributors. Our distributor relationships are generally non-exclusive, but we attempt to align ourselves with key distributors in the principal markets we serve. We believe “Mueller” is the most recognized brand in the U.S. water infrastructure industry.
Infrastructure
Infrastructure sells its products primarily through waterworks distributors to a wide variety of end user customers, including municipalities, water and wastewater utilities, gas utilities, and fire protection and construction contractors. Sales of our products are heavily influenced by the specifications for the underlying projects. Approximately 8%7%, 8% and 9% of Infrastructure’s net sales were to Canadian customers in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
At September 30, 2017,2020, Infrastructure had 8875 sales representatives in the field and 91132 inside marketing and sales professionals, as well as 129113 independent manufacturer’s representatives. In addition to calling on distributors, these representatives call on municipalities, water companies and other end users to ensure the products specified for their projects are our products or comparable to our products.
Infrastructure’s extensive installed base, broad product range and well-known brands have led to many long-standing relationships with the key distributors in the principal markets we serve. Our distribution network covers all of the major locations for our principal products in the United States and Canada. Although we have long-standing relationships with most of our key distributors, we typically do not have long-term contracts with them, including our two largest distributors, which together accounted for approximately 34%35%, 35%34% and 34%35% of Infrastructure’s gross sales in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. The loss of either of these distributors would have a material adverse effect on our business. See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-Our business depends on a small group of key customers for a significant portion of our sales.”
5

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Technologies
Mueller SystemsTechnologies sells its water metering systems, products and services directly to municipalities and to waterworks distributors. Echologicsdistributors and sells water leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services primarily to municipalities orand to utilities. At September 30, 2017,2020, Technologies had 3536 sales representatives in the field. Technologies’ five largest customers accounted for approximately 48%45%, 49%50% and 54%47% of its gross sales in 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-Our business depends on a small group of key customers for a significant portion of our sales.”
Backlog
We consider backlog to represent orders placed by customers for which goods or services have yet to be delivered. Backlog is a meaningful indicator for the Henry Pratt business unitproduct line of Infrastructure and the Mueller Systems business unit of Technologies. Henry Pratt manufacturesproducts consist of valves and other parts for large projects that typically require design and build specifications. The delivery lead time for parts used for these projects can be as long as nine months,longer than one year, and we expect approximately 15%16% of Henry Pratt’s backlog at the end of 20172020 will not be shipped until beyond 2018.2021. Mueller Systems manufactures or sources water meter systems that are sometimes ordered in large quantities with delivery dates over several years, and we expect approximately 10%52% of Mueller Systems’ backlog will not be shipped until beyond 2018. Backlog2021. Backlogs for Henry Pratt and Mueller Systems isare presented below.
September 30,
September 30, 20202019
2017 2016 (in millions)
(in millions)
Henry Pratt$73.2
 $67.8
PrattPratt$87.1 $81.6 
Mueller Systems23.2
 31.4
Mueller Systems48.2 8.9 
Sales cycles for metering systems can span several years and it is common for customers to place orders throughout the contract period. Although we believe we have a common understanding with our customer as to the total value of a contract when it is awarded, we do not recognize backlog until customer orders are received.

5

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Competition
The U.S. and Canadian markets for water infrastructure and flow control products are very competitive. See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-Strong competition could adversely affect prices and demand for our products and services, which would adversely affect our operating results.” There are only a few competitors for most of our product and service offerings. Many of our competitors are well-established companies with products that have strong brand recognition. We consider our installed base, product quality, customer service level, brand recognition, innovation, distribution and technical support to be competitive strengths.
The competitive environment for most of Infrastructure’s valve and hydrant products is mature and many end users are slow to transition to brands other than their historically preferred brand. It is difficult to increase market share in this environment. We believe our fire hydrants and valves enjoy strong competitive positions based primarily on the extent of their installed base, product quality, specified position and brand recognition. Our principal competitors for fire hydrants and iron gate valves are McWane, Inc. and American Cast Iron Pipe Company. The primary competitors for our brass products are The Ford Meter Box Company, Inc. and A.Y. McDonald Mfg. Co. Many brass valves are interchangeable among different manufacturers. With respect to our specialty valve products such as butterfly, plug, and check valves, our principal competitors are mainly DeZURIK, Val-Matic and McWane, Inc.
We believe the market for many of Infrastructure’s repair products is open to product innovation. Our current marketing is primarily focused on repair, joining and restraining of water infrastructure piping systems. The majority of this infrastructure consists of cast iron, ductile iron and plastic pipe, and our repair solutions work well with all of these. We believe our brand names are generally associated with premium products due to our patented technology and features. Our primary competitors in the repair market are: Romac Industries, Smith Blair, Viking Johnson, AVK Group, JCM Industries, and Georg Fisher Ltd..
6

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

The markets for products and services sold by Technologies are very competitive. Mueller Systems sells water metering products and systems, primarily in the United States. We believe a substantial portion of this market is in the process of transitioning from manually read meters to automatically read meters, but we also expect this transition to be relatively slow and that many end users will be reluctant to adopt brands other than their historically preferred brand. Although Mueller Systems’ market position is relatively small, we believe itsour automatically read meters and associated technology are well positioned to gain a greater share of these markets. ItsOur principal competitors are Sensus, Itron, Inc., Neptune Technology Group Inc., Badger Meter, Inc., Aclara LLC and Itron,Master Meter, Inc. Echologics sells water leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services in North America, the United Kingdom and select countries in Europe, Asia and the Middle East, with itsour primary markets being the United States and Canada. The worldwide market for leak detection and pipe condition assessment is highly fragmented with numerous competitors. ItsOur more significant competitors are Pure Technologies Ltd., Gutermann AG and Syrinix Ltd.
Research and Development
Our primary research and development (“R&D”) facilities are located in Chattanooga, Tennessee and in Ariel, Israel for Infrastructure and in Middleborough, MassachusettsAtlanta, Georgia and Toronto, Ontario for Technologies. The primary focus of these operations is to develop new products, improve and refine existing products and obtain and assure compliance with industry approval certifications or standards (such as AWWA, UL, FM, NSF and The Public Health and Safety Company). At September 30, 2017,2020, we employed 8578 people dedicated to R&D activities.  R&D expenses were $12.1$15.0 million, $9.9$14.3 million and $12.1$11.6 million during 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.

6

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Regulatory and Environmental Matters
Our operations are subject to numerous federal, state and local laws and regulations, both within and outside the United States, in areas such as: competition, government contracts, international trade, labor and employment, tax, licensing, consumer protection, environmental protection, workplace health and safety, and others.  These and other laws and regulations impact the manner in which we conduct our business, and changes in legislation or government policies can affect our operations, both favorably and unfavorably. For example, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) and similar state laws affect our operations by, among other things, imposing investigation and cleanup requirements for threatened or actual releases of hazardous substances. Under CERCLA, joint and several liability may be imposed on operators, generators, site owners, lessees and others regardless of fault or the legality of the original activity that caused or resulted in the release of the hazardous substances. Thus, we may be subject to liability under CERCLA and similar state laws for properties that (1) we currently own, lease or operate, (2) we, our predecessors, or former subsidiaries previously owned, leased or operated, (3) sites to which we, our predecessors or former subsidiaries sent waste materials, and (4) sites at which hazardous substances from our facilities’ operations have otherwise come to be located. The purchaser of U.S. Pipe has been identified as a “potentially responsible party” (“PRP”) under CERCLA in connection with a former manufacturing facility operated by U.S. Pipe that was in the vicinity of a Superfund site located in North Birmingham, Alabama. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement relating to our sale of U.S. Pipe, we agreed to indemnify the purchaser for certain environmental liabilities, including those arising out of the former manufacturing site in North Birmingham. Accordingly, the purchaser tendered the matter to us for indemnification, which we accepted. Ultimate liability for the site will depend on many factors that have not yet been determined, including the determination of EPA’s remediation costs, the number and financial viability of the other PRPs (there are four other PRPs currently) and the determination of the final allocation of the costs among the PRPs. For more information regarding this matter as well as others that may affect our business, including our capital expenditures, earnings and competitive position, see “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS,” “Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Environmental,” “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Contingencies” and Note 17.18. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
EmployeesHuman Capital
We believe our employees are our greatest asset. To ensure their health and well-being, we provide access to benefits and offer programs that support work-life balance and overall well-being including financial, physical and mental health resources. We also provide maternity and paternity benefits for biological and adoptive parents.
Our core values of respect, integrity, trust, safety and inclusion shape our culture and define who we are. They are guiding principles that we live by every day and are evident in everything we do. We strive to attract, develop and retain high performing talent and we support and reward employee performance.
7

Index to Financial Statements

We are committed to upholding fundamental human rights and believe that all human beings should be treated with dignity, fairness, and respect. We strive to promote inclusion in the workplace, engage with communities to build upon our understanding of potential human rights issues, and encourage our suppliers to treat their employees — and to interact with their communities — in a manner that respects human rights. We condemn human rights abuses and do not condone the use of slave or forced labor, human trafficking, child labor, the degrading treatment of individuals, physical punishment, or unsafe working conditions. All employees are required to understand and obey local laws, to report any suspected violations, and to act in accordance with our Core Values and Code of Conduct.
At September 30, 2017,2020, we employed approximately 2,6003,100 people, of whom 88%84% work in the United States. At September 30, 2017, 69%2020, 65% of our hourly workforce was represented by collective bargaining agreements.
Our locations with employees covered by such agreements are presented below.
LocationExpiration of current agreement(s)
Aurora, ILChattanooga, TNSeptember 2018October 2022, January 2023
Chattanooga, TNDecatur, ILOctober 2018, October 2019 and January 2020June 2025
Decatur, ILAlbertville, ALJune 2020October 2025
Albertville, ALAurora, ILOctober 2020September 2021
We believe relations with our employees, including those represented by collective bargaining agreements, are good.
Geographic Information
See Note 16.17. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

7

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Securities Exchange Act Reports
We file annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You may read and print materials that we have filed with the SEC from its website at www.sec.gov. Our SEC filings may also be viewed and copied at the SEC public reference room located at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. You may call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the public reference room.
In addition, certain of our SEC filings, including our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, our current reports on Form 8-K, our proxy statements and amendments to them can be viewed and printed free of charge from the investor information section of our website at www.muellerwaterproducts.com. Copies of our filings, specified exhibits and corporate governance materials are also available free of charge by writing us using the address on the cover of this annual report.
We are not including the information on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this annual report.
Our principal executive offices are located at 1200 Abernathy Road N.E., Suite 1200, Atlanta, Georgia 30328, and our main telephone number at that address is (770) 206-4200.
8

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Item 1A.    RISK FACTORS
Our end markets are subjectRisks related to risks relating to general economic cyclesour industries
A significant portion of our business depends on spending for water and conditions, which affect demand for our products and services and may adversely affect our financial results.wastewater infrastructure construction activity.
Our primary end markets are repair and replacement of water infrastructure, driven by municipal spending and new water infrastructure installation driven by new residential construction. Sustained uncertainty about any of these end markets could cause our distributors and end use customers to delay purchasing, or determine not to purchase, our products or services. General economic and other factors, including unemployment levels, energy costs, the state of the credit markets (including municipal bonds, mortgages, home equity loans and consumer credit) and other factors beyond our control, could adversely affect our sales, profitability and cash flows.
A significant portion of our business depends on spending for water and wastewater infrastructure construction activity.
AAs a result, a significant portion of our business depends on local, state and federal spending on water and wastewater infrastructure upgrade, repair and replacement. Funds for water and wastewater infrastructure repair and replacement typically come from local taxes, water fees and water rates. State and local governments and private water entities that do not adequately budget for capital expenditures when setting tax rates, water rates and water fees, as applicable, may be unable to pay for water infrastructure repair and replacement if they do not have access to other funding sources. In addition, reductions or delays in federal spending related to water or wastewater infrastructure could adversely affect state or local projects and may adversely affect our financial results.
Governments and private water entities may have limited abilities to increase taxes, water fees or water rates, as applicable. It is not unusual for water and wastewater projects to be delayed and rescheduled for a number of reasons, including changes in project priorities, increasing interest rates and inflation and difficulties in complying with environmental and other governmental regulations. In addition, reductions or delaysFor example, changes in federal spending related tointerest rates and credit markets (including municipal bonds, mortgages, home equity loans and consumer credit) can significantly increase the costs of the projects in which our products are utilized — such as new residential construction and water orand wastewater infrastructure upgrade, repair and replacement projects — and lead to such projects being reduced, delayed and/or rescheduled, which could adversely affect state or local projectsresult in a decrease in our revenues and mayearnings and adversely affect our financial results.condition. In addition, higher interest rates are often accompanied by inflation. In an inflationary environment, we may be unable to raise the prices of our products sufficiently to keep up with the rate of inflation, which would reduce our profit margins.
Some state and local governments have placed or may place significant restrictions on the use of water by their constituents. These types of water use restrictions may lead to reduced water revenues by private water entities, municipalities or other governmental agencies, which could similarly affect funding decisions for water-related projects.
Poor economic conditions may cause states, municipalities or private water entities to receive lower than anticipated revenues, which may lead to reduced or delayed funding for water infrastructure projects. Even if favorable economic conditions exist, water infrastructure owners may choose not to address deferred infrastructure needs due to a variety of political factors or competing spending priorities.
Low levels of spending for water and wastewater infrastructure construction activity could adversely affect our sales, profitability and cash flows.

8

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Residential construction activity is important to our business and adverse conditions or sustained uncertainty regarding this market could adversely affect our financial results.
Because a significant portion of our business depends on newNew water and wastewater infrastructure spending which in turn largely depends onis heavily dependent upon residential construction,construction. As a result, our financial performance depends significantly on the stability and growth of the residential construction market. This market depends on a variety of factors beyond our control, including household formation, consumer confidence, interest rates, inflation and the availability of mortgage financing, as well as the mix between single and multifamily construction, availability of construction labor and ultimately the extent to which new construction leads to the development of raw land. Adverse conditions or sustained uncertainty regarding the residential construction market could adversely affect our sales, profitability and cash flows.flows, including the risk that one or more of our distributors and/or end use customers decide to delay purchasing, or determine not to purchase, our products or services.
Our business depends on a small group of key customers for a significant portion of our sales.
Infrastructure sells products primarily to distributors and our success depends on these outside parties operating their businesses profitably and effectively. These distributors’ profitability and effectiveness can vary significantly from company to company and from region to region within the same company. Further, our largest distributors generally also carry competing products. We may fail to align our operations with successful distributors in any given market.
Distributors in our industry have experienced consolidation in recent years. If such consolidation continues, our distributors could be acquired by other distributors who have better relationships with our competitors and pricing and profit margin pressure may intensify. Pricing and profit margin pressure or the loss of any one of our key distributors in any market could adversely affect our operating results.
9

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Technologies primarily sells directly to end users. Some of these customers represent a relatively high concentration of net sales. Over time, expected growth in sales is expected to lessen the significance of individual customers. In the short term, net sales could decline if existing significant customers do not continue to purchase our products or services and new customers are not obtained to replace them.
Strong competition could adversely affect prices and demand for our products and services, which would adversely affect our operating results.
The U.S. and Canadian markets for water infrastructure and flow control products are very competitive. While there are only a few competitors for most of our product and service offerings, many of our competitors are well-established companies with strong brand recognition. We compete on the basis of a variety of factors, including the quality, price and innovation of our products, services and service levels. Our ability to retain our customers in the face of competition depends on our ability to market our products and services to our customers and end users effectively.
The U.S. markets for water metering products and systems are highly competitive. Our primary competitors benefit from strong market positions and many end users are slow to transition to new products or new brands. Our ability to gain customers depends on our technological advancements and ability to market our products and services to our customers and end users effectively.
In addition to competition from North American companies, we face the threat of competition from outside of North America. The intensity of competition from these companies is affected by fluctuations in the value of the U.S. dollar against their local currencies, the cost to ship competitive products into North America and the availability of trade remedies, if any. Competition may also increase as a result of U.S. competitors shifting their operations to lower-cost countries or otherwise reducing their costs.
Our competitors may reduce the prices of their products or services, improve their quality, improve their functionality or enhance their marketing or sales activities. Any of these potential developments could adversely affect our prices and demand for our products and services.
The long-term success of our newer systems and solutions, including the related products, software and services, such as smart metering, and leak detection and pipe condition assessment, in Technologies, depends on market acceptance and our ability to manage the risks associated with the introduction of new products and systems.acceptance.
Technologies'Technologies’ smart metering and leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services have much less market history than many of Infrastructure'sInfrastructure’s products. Our investments in smart metering have primarily focused on the market for AMI and have been based on our belief that water utilities will transition over time from traditional manually-read meters to automatically-read meters. The market for AMI is relatively new and continues to evolve, and the U.S. markets for water meter products and systems are highly competitive. Water utilities have traditionally been slow adopters of new technology and may

9

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


not adopt AMI as quickly as we expect, due, in part, to the substantial investment related to installation of AMI systems. The strong market positions of our primary competitors may also slow the adoption of our products. Similarly, the adoption of our leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services depends on the willingness of our customers to invest in new product and service offerings, and the pace of adoption may be slower than we expect. If the market for AMI develops more slowly than we expect or if our new leak detection and pipe condition assessment products and services fail to gain market acceptance, our opportunity to grow these businesses will be limited.
In addition,
10

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Risks related to our business strategy
We may not be able to adequately manage the risks associated with the introduction and deployment of new products and systems, including increased warranty costs.
The success of our new products and systems, such as our recently launched smart hydrant and Sentryx software platform, will depend on our ability to manage the risks associated with their introduction, including the risk that new products and systems may have quality or other defects or deficiencies in their early stages that result in their failure to satisfy performance or reliability requirements. Our success will depend in part on our ability to manage these risks, including costs associated with manufacturing, installation, maintenance and warranties. These challenges can be costly and technologically challenging, and we cannot determine in advance the ultimate effect they may have. For example, during the quarterquarters ended March 30, 2017 and June 30, 2018, we recorded a discrete warranty expenseexpenses of $9.8 million and $14.1 million, respectively, associated with certain radio products that Technologies produced between 2011 and 2014,prior to 2017, as described more fully in Note 17.18. to the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Warranty liabilities and the related reserve estimation process is highly judgmental due to the complex nature of these exposures and the unique circumstances of each claim. Furthermore, once claims are asserted for an alleged product defect by municipalities or other customers, it can be difficult to determine the level of potential exposure or liability related to such allegation to which the assertion of these claims will expand geographically. Although we have obtained insurance for product liability claims, such policies may not be available or adequate to cover the liability for damages, the cost of repairs and/or the expense of litigation. Current and future claims may arise out of events or circumstances not covered by insurance and not subject to effective indemnification agreements with our subcontractors. Failure to successfully manage these challenges could result in lost revenue, significant warranty and other expenses, and harm to our reputation.
Inefficient or ineffective allocation of capital, along with increased capital expenditure levels to modernize our aging facilities and expand our capabilities, could adversely affect our operating results and/or shareholder value, including negatively impacting our available cash reserves and prevent acquisition or other cash-intensive opportunities.
Our goal is to invest capital to generate long-term value for our shareholders. This includes spending on capital projects, such as developing or acquiring strategic businesses, technologies and product lines with the potential to strengthen our industry position, enhancing our existing set of product and service offerings, or entering new markets, as well as periodically returning value to our stockholders through share repurchases and dividends. For example, we have completed the construction of our large valve manufacturing expansion in Chattanooga, Tennessee and made an additional investment in a facility in Kimball, Tennessee to further expand our capabilities in the area and allow us to insource more products and operations. We also expect to make significant progress in fiscal 2021 on the construction of our new brass manufacturing facility in Decatur, Illinois, which we expect to be completed in 2022. To a large degree, capital efficiency reflects how well we manage key risks. The actions taken to address specific risks may affect how well we manage the more general risk of capital efficiency. If we do not properly allocate and manage our capital, we may fail to produce optimal financial results and we may experience a reduction in stockholder value, including increased volatility in our stock price.
We may not realize the expected benefits from our strategic reorganization plans.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2017,October 2018, we announced the move of our strategic reorganization plan designedMiddleborough, Massachusetts facility to Atlanta, which will allow us to consolidate our resources and accelerate our product innovation through creation of a research and revenue growth. In particular, we reconfigured our divisional structure around products, with five business teams that have linedevelopment center of excellence for software and cross-functional responsibility for managing distinct product portfolios. We believe the new organizational structure will be better aligned with business needs and generate greater efficiencies.
Activities under the plan were initiatedelectronics in the fourth quarter of 2017, and are expected to be completed in 2018.Atlanta, Georgia. As a result of the restructuring andthis reorganization, we expect annual cost reductionssavings of approximately $7$1.5 million, annually, which includes headcount reduction and lower professional fees and other expenses, and takes into account the hiring and alignment of new administrativeengineering talent.
These measures, however, could yield unintended consequences, such as distractionDuring November 2019, we announced the purchase of a new facility in Kimball, Tennessee, which will allow us to support and enhance our investment in our Chattanooga large casting foundry. As a result of this reorganization, we announced the subsequent closures of our managementfacilities in Hammond, Indiana and employees, business disruption, inability to attract or retain key personnel, and reduced employee productivity, which could negatively affect our business, sales, financial condition and results of operations.Woodland, Washington. We expect to incur about $11have incurred $2.5 million in restructuring charges associated with the reorganization.related to this reorganization in fiscal 2020. We cannot guarantee that the activities under the restructuring and reorganization activities will result in the desired efficiencies and estimated cost savings.
Our business strategy includes developing, acquiring and investing in companies and technologies that broaden our product portfolio or complement our existing business, which could be unsuccessful or consume significant resources and adversely affect our operating results.
WeAs part of our long-term business strategy, we will continue to evaluate the development or acquisition of strategic businesses, technologies and product lines with the potential to strengthen our industry position, enhance and expand our existing set of product and service offerings, or enter new markets. We may be unable to identify or successfully complete suitable acquisitions in the future and completed acquisitions may not be successful.
11

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Acquisitions and technology investments may involve significant cash expenditures, debt incurrence, operating losses and expenses that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. These types of transactions involve numerous other risks, including:
Diversion of management time and attention from existing operations;
Difficulties in integrating acquired businesses, technologies and personnel into our business or into our compliance and control programs;programs, particularly those that involve international operations;
Working with partners or other ownership structures with shared decision-making authority (our interests and other ownership interests may be inconsistent);
Difficulties in obtaining and verifying relevant information regarding a business or technology prior to the consummation of the transaction, including the identification and assessment of liabilities, claims or other circumstances, including those relating to intellectual property claims, that could result in litigation or regulatory exposure;
Assumptions of liabilities that exceed our assessedestimated amounts;

10

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Verifying the financial statements and other business information of an acquired business;
Inability to obtain required regulatory approvals and/or required financing on favorable terms;
Potential loss of key employees, contractual relationships or customers;
Increased operating expenses related to the acquired businesses or technologies;
The failure of new technologies, products or services to gain market acceptance with acceptable profit margins;
Entering new markets in which we have little or no experience or in which competitors may have stronger market positions;
Dilution of interests of holders of our common shares through the issuance of equity securities or equity-linked securities; and
Inability to achieve expected synergies.synergies or the achievement of such synergies taking longer than expected to realize, including increases in revenue, enhanced efficiencies, or increased market share, or the benefits may ultimately be smaller than we expected.
Any acquisitions or investments may ultimately harm our business or financial condition, as they may not be successful and may ultimately have an adverse effect on our operating results or financial condition and/or result in impairment charges.
InefficientPotential international business opportunities may expose us to additional risks, including currency exchange fluctuations.
A part of our growth strategy depends on us expanding internationally. Although net sales outside of the United States and Canada account for a relatively small percentage of our total net sales, we expect to increase our level of business activity outside of the United States and Canada, as illustrated by our acquisition of Krausz Industries, which is based in Tel Aviv, Israel, in December 2018. Some countries that present potential good business opportunities also face political and economic instability and vulnerability to infrastructure and other disruptions. Seeking to expand our business internationally exposes us to additional risks, which include foreign exchange risks and currency fluctuations (as discussed more fully below), political and economic uncertainties, changes in local business conditions and national and international conflicts. A primary risk we face in connection with our export shipments relates to our ability to collect amounts due from customers. We also face the potential risks arising from staffing, monitoring and managing international operations, including the risk such activities may divert our resources and management time.
In addition, compliance with the laws and regulations of multiple international jurisdictions increases our cost of doing business. International operations are subject to anti-corruption laws and anti-competition regulations, among others. For example, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar non-U.S. anti-corruption laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments or ineffective allocationproviding anything of capitalvalue to improperly influence foreign government officials and certain others for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, or obtaining an unfair advantage. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in criminal and civil sanctions, disrupt our business and adversely affect our brands, international expansion efforts, business and operating results and/results.
12

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

We earn revenues and incur expenses in foreign currencies as part of our operations outside of the United States. Accordingly, fluctuations in currency exchange rates may significantly increase the amount of U.S. dollars required for foreign currency expenses or stockholder value.significantly decrease the U.S. dollars we receive from foreign currency revenues. As a result, changes between the foreign exchange rates and the U.S. dollar affect the amounts we record for our foreign assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, and could have a negative effect on our financial results. We expect that our exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations will grow as the relative contribution of our non-U.S. operations increases through both organic and inorganic growth.
Our goal is to invest capital to maximize our overall long-term returns. This includes spending on capital projects, such as developing or acquiring strategic businesses, technologies and product lines with the potential to strengthen our industry position, enhancing our existing set of product and service offerings, or entering new markets, as well as periodically returning valueRisks related to our stockholders through share repurchases and dividends. To a large degree, capital efficiency reflects how well we manage key risks. The actions taken to address specific risks may affect how well we manage the more general risk of capital efficiency. If we do not properly allocate our capital, we may fail to produce optimal financial results and we may experience a reduction in stockholder value, including increased volatility in our stock price.operations
Our reliance on vendors for certain products, some of which are single-source or limited source suppliers, could harm our business by adversely affecting product availability, reliability or cost.
We maintain several single-source or limited-source supplier relationships with manufacturers, including some outside of the United States. If the supply of a critical single- or limited-source product is delayed or curtailed, we may not be able to ship the related products in desired quantities or in a timely manner. Even where multiple sources of supply are available, qualification of the alternative suppliers and establishment of reliable supplies could result in delays and a possible loss of sales, which could harm our operating results.
These relationships reduce our direct control over production. Our reliance on these vendors subjects us to a greater risk of shortages, and reduced control over delivery schedules of products, as well as a greater risk of increases in product costs. In instances where we stock lower levels of product inventories, a disruption in product availability could harm our financial performance and our ability to satisfy customer needs. In addition, defective products from these manufacturers could reduce product reliability and harm our reputation.
A disruption in our supply chain or other factors impacting the distribution of our products could adversely affect our business.
A disruption within our logistics or supply chain network at any of the freight companies that deliver us components for our manufacturing operations in the United States or ship our fully-assembled products to our customers could adversely affect our business and result in lost sales or harm to our reputation. Our supply chain is dependent on third party ocean-going container ships, rail, barge and trucking systems and, therefore, disruption in these logistics services because of weather-related problems, strikes, bankruptcies or other events could adversely affect our financial performance and financial condition, negatively impacting sales, profitability and cash flows.
Seasonal demand for certain of our products and services may adversely affect our financial results.
Sales of some of our products, including iron gate valves and fire hydrants, are seasonal, with lower sales in our first and second fiscal quarters when weather conditions throughout most of North America tend to be cold resulting in lower levels of construction activity.This seasonality in demand has resulted in fluctuations in our sales and operating results.To satisfy demand during expected peak periods, we may incur costs associated with building inventory in off-peak periods, and our projections as to future needs may not be accurate.Because many of our expenses are fixed, seasonal trends can cause reductions in our profitability and profit margins and deterioration of our financial condition during periods affected by lower production or sales activity.
Transportation costs are relatively high for most of our products.
Transportation costs can be an important factor in a customer’s purchasing decision. Many of our products are big, bulky and heavy, which tend to increase transportation costs. We also have relatively few manufacturing sites, which tends to increase transportation distances to our customers and costs. High transportation costs could make our products less competitive compared to similar or alternative products offered by competitors.

Our high fixed costs may make it more difficult for us to respond to economic cycles.
A significant portion of our cost structure is fixed, including manufacturing overhead, capital equipment and research and development costs. In a prolonged economic downturn, these fixed costs may cause our gross margins to erode and earnings to decline.
11
13

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



We may experience difficulties implementing upgrades to our enterprise resource planning system.
We continue to be engaged in a multi-year implementation of upgrades to our enterprise resource planning system (ERP) and other systems. The ERP is designed to accurately maintain the company’s books and records and provide information important to the operation of the business to the company’s management team. These upgrades will require significant investment of human and financial resources. In implementing the ERP upgrade, we may experience significant delays, increased costs and other difficulties. Any significant disruption or deficiency in the design and implementation of the ERP upgrades could adversely affect our ability to process orders, ship product, send invoices and track payments, fulfill contractual obligations or otherwise operate our business. While we have invested significant resources in planning and project management, significant implementation issues may arise.
Normal operations at our key manufacturing facilities may be interrupted.
Some of our key products, including fire hydrants and iron gate valves, are manufactured at single or few manufacturing facilities that depend on critical pieces of heavy equipment that cannot be economically moved to other locations. We are therefore limited in our ability to shift production among locations. The operations at our manufacturing facilities may be interrupted or impaired by various operating risks, including, but not limited to:
Catastrophic events, such as fires, floods, explosions, natural disasters, severe weather or other similar occurrences;
Terrorist attacks, war, mass shootings or other acts of violence;
Interruptions in the delivery of raw materials, shortages of equipment or spare parts, or other manufacturing inputs;
Adverse government regulations;
Equipment or information systems breakdowns or failures;
Information systems failures;
Violations of our permit requirements or revocation of permits;
Releases of pollutants and hazardous substances to air, soil, surface water or ground water;
Shortages of equipment or spare parts;Labor disputes; and
Labor disputes.Cyberattacks and events.
The occurrence of any of these events may impair our production capabilities and adversely affect our sales, profitability and cash flows.
Any inability to protect our intellectual property or our failure to effectively defend against intellectual property infringement claims could adversely affect our competitive position.
Our business depends on our technology and expertise, which were largely developed internally and are not subject to statutory protection. We rely on a combination of patent protection, copyright and trademark laws, trade secrets protection, employee and third-party confidentiality agreements and technical measures to protect our intellectual property rights. The measures that we take to protect our intellectual property rights may not adequately deter infringement, misappropriation or independent development of our technology, and they may not prevent an unauthorized party from obtaining or using information or intellectual property that we regard as proprietary or keep others from using brand names similar to our own. The disclosure, misappropriation or infringement of our intellectual property could harm our competitive position. In addition, our actions to enforce our rights may result in substantial costs and the diversion of management time and other resources. We may also be subject to intellectual property infringement claims from time to time, which may result in additional expenses and diverting resources to respond to these claims. Finally, for those products in our portfolio that rely on patent protection, once a patent has expired the product is more subject to competition. Products under patent protection potentially generate significantly higher revenue and earnings than those not protected by patents. If we fail to successfully enforce our intellectual property rights or register new patents, our competitive position could suffer, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
14

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

If we do not successfully maintain our information and technology networks, including the security of those networks, our operations could be disrupted and unanticipated increases in costs and/or decreases in revenues could result.
We rely on various information technology systems, some of which are controlled by outside service providers, to manage key aspects of our operations. The proper functioning of our information technology systems is important to the successful operation of our business. If critical information technology systems fail, or are otherwise unavailable, our ability to manufacture products, process orders, track credit risk, identify business opportunities, maintain proper levels of inventories, collect accounts receivable, pay expenses and otherwise manage our business would be adversely affected.
We depend on the Internet and our information technology infrastructure for electronic communications among our locations around the world and betweenamong our personnel and suppliers and customers. SecurityCyber and other data security breaches of this infrastructure can create system disruptions, shutdowns or unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. If we or our service providers are unable to prevent these breaches, our operations could be disrupted or we may suffer financial, reputational or other harm because of lost or misappropriated information.

12

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We may fail to effectively manage confidential data, which could harm our reputation, result in substantial additional costs and subject us to litigation.
As we grow our Technologies businesses, we continue to accumulate increasing volumes of customer data. In addition, we store personal information in connection with our human resources operations. Our efforts to protect this information may be unsuccessful due to employee errors or malfeasance, technical malfunctions, the actions of third parties (such as cyber attack) or other factors. If our cyber defenses and other countermeasures we deploy are unable to protect personal data, it could be accessed or disclosed improperly, which could expose us to liability, harm our reputation and deter current and potential users from using our products and services. The regulatory environment related to cyber and information security, data collection and privacy is increasingly rigorous, with new and constantly changing requirements applicable to our business, and compliance with those requirements could result in additional costs.
Cyberattacks and security vulnerabilities could lead to reduced revenue, increased costs, liability claims, or harm to our reputation.
Cyberthreats are constantly evolving and can take a variety of forms, increasing the difficulty of detecting and successfully defending against them.  Individual and groups of hackers and sophisticated organizations, including state-sponsored organizations or nation-states, continuously undertake attacks that pose threats to our customers and our IT.  These actors may use a wide variety of methods, which may include developing and deploying malicious software or exploiting vulnerabilities in hardware, software, or other infrastructure in order to attack our products and services or gain access to our networks and datacenters, using social engineering techniques to induce our employees, users, partners, or customers to disclose passwords or other sensitive information or take other actions to gain access to our data or our users’ or customers’ data, or acting in a coordinated manner to launch distributed denial of service or other coordinated attacks. Inadequate account security practices may also result in unauthorized access to confidential data.
We may have no current capability to detect certain vulnerabilities, which may allow them to persist in the environment over long periods of time.  Cyberthreats can have cascading impacts that unfold with increasing speed across our internal networks and systems and those of our partners and customers. Breaches of our facilities, network, or data security could disrupt the security of our systems and business applications, impair our ability to provide services to our customers and protect the privacy of their data, result in product development delays, compromise confidential or technical business information harming our reputation, result in theft or misuse of our intellectual property or other assets, require us to allocate more resources to improved technologies, or otherwise adversely affect our business.
We may be affected by new governmental legislation and regulations relating to carbon dioxide emissions.
Many of our manufacturing plants use significant amounts of electricity generated by burning fossil fuels, which releases carbon dioxide.Several state courts and administrative agencies are considering the scope and scale of carbon dioxide emission regulation under various laws pertaining to the environment, energy use and development and greenhouse gas emissions.In addition, several states are considering various carbon dioxide registration and reduction programs.The final details and scope of these various legislative, regulatory and policy measures are unclear and their potential impact is still uncertain, so we cannot fully predict the impact on our business.
The potential impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain.Although the financial impact of these potential changes is not reasonably estimable at this time, our operations in certain locations and those of our customers and suppliers could potentially be adversely affected, which could adversely affect our sales, profitability and cash flows.
15

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

We are subject to a variety of claims, investigations and litigation that could adversely affect our results of operations and harm our reputation.
In the normal course of our business, we are subject to claims and lawsuits, including from time to time claims for damages related to product liability and warranties, investigations by governmental agencies, litigation alleging the infringement of intellectual property rights and litigation related to employee matters and commercial disputes. We may also be subject to investigations, claims, litigation and other proceedings outside the ordinary course of business, such as the February 2019 mass shooting event we experienced in our Aurora, Illinois facility. Defending these lawsuits and becoming involved in these investigations may divert our management’s attention, and may cause us to incur significant expenses.expenses, even if there is no evidence that our systems or components were the cause of the claim. In addition, we may be required to pay damage awards, penalties or settlements, or become subject to injunctions or other equitable remedies, that could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. If we were required to participate in a product recall or take other action to address a product liability or other claim, our reputation could be harmed. Moreover, any insurance or indemnification rights that we have may be insufficient or unavailable to protect us against potential loss exposures. See “Item 1. BUSINESS - Regulatory and Environmental Matters,” “Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Environmental,” “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Contingencies” and Note 17.18. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We are subject to stringent environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that impose significant compliance costs. Any failure to satisfy these laws and regulations may adversely affect us.
We are subject to stringent laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment, health and safety and incur significant capital and other expenditures to comply with these requirements. Failure to comply with any environmental, health or safety requirements could result in the assessment of damages, the imposition of penalties, suspension of production, changes to equipment or processes or a cessation of operations at our facilities, any of which could have a material adverse effect on our business. Because these laws are complex, subject to change and may be applied retroactively, we cannot predict with certainty the extent of our future liabilities with respect to environmental, health and safety matters and whether they will be material.
In addition, certain statutes such as CERCLA may impose joint and several liability for the costs of remedial investigations and actions on entities that generated waste, arranged for disposal of waste, transported to or selected the disposal sites and the past and present owners and operators of such sites. All such PRPs“potentially responsible parties” (“PRP”) (or any one of them, including us) may be required to bear all of such costs regardless of fault, the legality of the original disposal or ownership of the disposal site. As a result, we may be required to conduct investigations and perform remedial activities at current and former operating and manufacturing sites where we have been, or in the future could be, named a PRP with respect to such environmental liabilities, any of which could require us to incur material costs. The final remediation costs of these environmental sites may exceed current estimated costs, and additional sites in the future may require material remediation expenses. If actual expenditures exceed our estimates, our results of operations and financial position could be materially and adversely affected. See “Item 1. BUSINESS - Regulatory and Environmental Matters,” “Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS - Environmental,” “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Contingencies” and Note 17. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

13

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We may have substantial additional liability for federal income tax allegedly owed by Walter Energy.
We were spun-off from Walter Industries, Inc. on December 14, 2006. Walter Industries, Inc. subsequently changed its name to Walter Energy, Inc. (“Walter Energy”). Under federal tax rules, each member of a consolidated group for federal income tax purposes is jointly and severally liable for the federal income tax liability of each other member of the consolidated group for any year in which it is a member of the group at any time during such year. In other words, each member of Walter Energy’s consolidated tax group, which included us (and our subsidiaries) through the date of our spin-off from Walter Energy (i.e., December 14, 2006), is jointly and severally liable for the federal income tax liability of each other member of Walter Energy’s consolidated group for any year in which it is a member of the group. Accordingly, we could be liable in the event any such liability is incurred, and not discharged, by any other member of Walter Energy’s consolidated group for any period during which we were included in the Walter Energy consolidated group.
A dispute currently exists with regard to federal income taxes for years 1980 to 1994 and 1999 to 2001 allegedly owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group. As described above, because we were a member of Walter Energy’s consolidated group during these years, we are jointly and severally liable for any final tax determination with respect to these years, which means that in the event Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed, we would be liable.
Walter Energy filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in July 2015. In February 2017, the Chapter 11 case was converted to a liquidation proceeding under Chapter 7 of the Code. We continue to monitor these proceedings to determine whether we could be liable for all or a portion of any federal income tax liability resulting from this dispute if it is incurred, and not discharged, for any period during which we were included in the Walter Energy consolidated group. Our liability, if any, relating to the tax-related liabilities of Walter Energy’s consolidated tax group for tax years prior to 2007 could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations. See Item 3. Legal Proceedings and Note 17.18. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
We rely on successors to Tyco to indemnify us for certain liabilities and they may become financially unable or fail to comply with the terms of the indemnity.
Under the terms of the acquisition agreement relating to the August 1999 sale by Tyco of our businesses to a previous owner of these businesses, we are indemnified by certain Tyco entities (“Tyco Indemnitors”) for all liabilities arising in connection with the operation of these businesses prior to their sale by Tyco, including with respect to products manufactured or sold prior to the closing of that transaction, as well as certain environmental liabilities. These indemnities survive indefinitely and are not subject to any dollar limits. In the past, Tyco Indemnitors have made substantial payments and assumed defense of claims in connection with these indemnification obligations. Tyco’s indemnity does not cover liabilities to the extent caused by us or the operation of our businesses after August 1999, nor does it cover liabilities arising with respect to businesses or sites acquired after August 1999. Since 2007, Tyco has engaged in multiple corporate restructurings, split-offs and divestitures. The result of these transactions is that the assets of, and control over, Tyco Indemnitors has changed. Should any Tyco Indemnitor become financially unable or fail to comply with the terms of the indemnity, we may be responsible for such obligations or liabilities.
16

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Risks related to our human capital
We depend on qualified personnel and, if we are unable to retain or hire executive officers, key employees and
skilled personnel, we may not be able to achieve our strategic objectives and our business may be adversely
affected.
Our ability to expand or maintain our business depends on our ability to hire, train and retain employees with the skills necessary to understand and adapt to the continuously developing needs of our customers. The increasing demand for qualified personnel makes it more difficult for us to attract and retain employees with requisite skill sets, particularly employees with specialized technical and trade experience. Changing demographics and labor work force trends also may result in a loss of knowledge and skills as experienced workers retire. If we fail to attract, motivate, train and retain qualified personnel, or if we experience excessive turnover, we may experience declining sales, manufacturing delays or other inefficiencies, increased recruiting, training and relocation costs and other difficulties, and our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be materially and adversely affected. Competition for qualified personnel is intense particularly in several regions of the United States whereand we manufacture products and particularly within Technologies. We may not be successful in attracting or retaining qualified personnel, which could negatively impact our business.
In addition, we have recently made or announced several key changes to our leadership team, including the addition of a new Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Information Officer as well as a number of new general managers for our business units. If we fail to effectively implement these management and personnel changes, we may be unable to achieve our strategic objectives and operating efficiencies. Furthermore, the loss of any of our key personnel could jeopardize our relationships with customers and may adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

14

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Our expenditures for pension obligations could be materially higher than we have predicted.
We provide pension benefits to certain current and former employees. To determine our future payment obligations under the plans, certain rates of return on the plans’ assets, growth rates of certain costs and participant longevity have been estimated. The proportion of the assets held by our U.S. pension plan invested in fixed income securities, instead of equity securities, has increased over historical levels. This shift in asset allocation has resulted in a decrease in the estimated rate of return on plan assets for this plan. Assumed discount rates, expected return on plan assets and participant longevity have significant effects on the amounts reported for the pension obligations and pension expense.
The funded status of our pension plans can also be influenced by regulatory requirements, which can change unexpectedly and impose higher costs if funding levels are below certain thresholds. We may increase contributions to our pension plans to avoid or reduce these higher costs.
Significant adverse changes in credit and capital markets or changes in investments could result in discount rates or actual rates of return on plan assets being materially lower than projected and require us to increase pension contributions in future years to meet funding level requirements. Increasing life spans for plan participants may increase the estimated benefit payments and increase the amounts reported for pension obligations, pension contributions and pension expense. If increased funding requirements are particularly significant and sustained, our overall liquidity could be materially reduced, which could cause us, among other things, to reduce investments and capital expenditures, or restructure or refinance our debt.
Risks related to our international operations
Any failure to satisfy international trade laws and regulations or to otherwise comply with changes or other trade developments may adversely affect us.
Our operations require importing and exporting goods and technology among countries on a regular basis. Thus, the sale and shipment of our products and services across international borders, as well as the purchase of components and products from international sources, subject us to extensive trade laws and regulations. Trade laws and regulations are complex, differ by country, and are enforced by a variety of government agencies. Because we are subject to extensive trade laws and regulations in the countries in which we operate, we are subject to the risk that laws and regulations could change in a way that would expose us to additional costs, penalties or liabilities, and our policies and procedures may not always protect us from actions that would violate international trade laws and regulations. For example, certain federal legislation requires the use of American iron and steel products in certain water projects receiving certain federal appropriations. We have incurred costs in connection with ensuring our ability to certify to these requirements, including those associated with enhancing our assembly operations and sourcing practices. As a result of the varying legal and regulatory requirements to which our cross-border activities are subject, we may not always be in compliance with the trade laws and regulations in all respects. Any improper actions could subject us to civil or criminal penalties, including material monetary fines, or other adverse actions, including denial of import or export privileges, and could harm our reputation and our business prospects.
Our high fixed
17

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

If significant tariffs or other restrictions continue to be placed on foreign imports by the United States and related counter-measures are taken by impacted foreign countries, our revenue and results of operations may be harmed.
If significant tariffs or other restrictions continue to be placed on foreign imports by the United States and related counter-measures are taken by impacted foreign countries, our revenue and results of operations may be harmed.The Trump Administration has signaled that it may continue to alter trade agreements and terms between China and the United States, including limiting trade with China and/or imposing additional tariffs on imports from China most recently resulting in a Phase One trade deal in January of 2020.In March 2018, President Trump imposed a 25% tariff on steel imports and a 10% tariff on aluminum imports and announced additional tariffs on goods imported from China specifically, as well as certain other countries.The materials subject to these tariffs to date can impact our raw material costs as well. However, if further tariffs are imposed on a broader range of imports, or if further retaliatory trade measures are taken by China or other countries in response to additional tariffs, we may make it more difficult for usbe required to respond to economic cycles.
A significant portionraise our prices or incur additional expenses, which may result in the loss of customers and harm our cost structure is fixed, including manufacturing overhead, capital equipment and research and development costs. In a prolonged economic downturn, these fixed costs may cause our gross margins to erode and earnings to decline.operating performance.
The prices of our purchased components and raw materials can be volatile.
Our operations require substantial amounts of purchased components and raw materials, such as scrap steel, sand, resin, brass ingot and steel pipe. We generally purchase components and raw materials at current market prices. The cost and availability of these materials are subject to economic forces largely beyond our control, including North American and international demand, foreign currency exchange rates, freight costs, tariffs and commodity speculation.
We may not be able to pass on the entire cost of price increases for purchased components and raw materials to our customers or offset fully the effects of these higher costs through productivity improvements. In particular, when purchased component or raw material prices increase rapidly or to significantly higher than normal levels, we may not be able to pass cost increases through to our customers on a timely basis, if at all, which would reduce our profitability and cash flows. In addition, if purchased components or raw materials were not available or not available on commercially reasonable terms, our sales, profitability and cash flows would be reduced. Our competitors may secure more reliable sources of purchased components and raw materials or they may obtain these supplies on more favorable terms than we do, which could give them a cost advantage.
Potential internationalOther risks related to our business opportunities may expose us to additional risks.

15

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


A part of our growth strategy depends on us expanding internationally. Although net sales outsideThe negative impact of the United StatesCOVID-19 pandemic on our operations may increase
The outbreak of COVID-19 is impacting cities, states and Canada account forcountries around the world and is temporarily changing the way we live and work. The pandemic has also caused a small percentage ofshift in how we manage our total net sales,business, think about work and how our work gets done. Businesses as well as federal, state and local governments have implemented significant measures to attempt to mitigate this public health crisis and may continue to take additional actions. Although we expect to increase our level of business activity outsidecannot determine the ultimate severity or duration of the United States and Canada. Some countries that present good business opportunities also face political and economic instability and vulnerability to infrastructure and other disruptions. Seeking to expand our business internationally exposes us to additional risks, which include political and economic uncertainties, currency fluctuations, changes in local business conditions and national and international conflicts. A primary risk we face in connection with our export shipments relates to our ability to collect amounts due from customers. We also facepandemic at this time, the potential risks arising from staffing, monitoring and managing international operations, including the risk such activities may divert our resources and management time.
In addition, compliance with the laws and regulations of multiple international jurisdictions increases our cost of doing business. International operations are subject to anti-corruption laws and anti-competition regulations, among others. For example, the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and similar non-U.S. anti-corruption laws generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments or providing anything of value to improperly influence foreign government officials and certain others for the purpose of obtaining or retaining business, or obtaining an unfair advantage. Violations of these laws and regulations could result in criminal and civil sanctions, disrupt our business and adversely affect our brands, international expansion efforts, business and operating results.
Seasonal demand for certain of our products and services may adversely affect our financial results.
Sales of some of our products, including iron gate valves and fire hydrants, are seasonal, with lower sales in our first and second fiscal quarters when weather conditions throughout most of North America tend to be cold resulting in lower levels of construction activity. This seasonality in demand has resulted in fluctuations in our sales and operating results. To satisfy demand during expected peak periods, we may incur costs associated with building inventory in off-peak periods, and our projections as to future needs may not be accurate. Because many of our expenses are fixed, seasonal trends can cause reductions in our profitability and profit margins and deterioration ofpandemic is having meaningful adverse impacts on our financial condition during periods affected by lower productionand results of operations as discussed in PART II, “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.”. As the impact of the pandemic continues, we may continue to experience additional plant closures, limitations in the ways we operate within our facilities, illness or sales activity.
We may be affected by new governmental legislation and regulations relating to carbon dioxide emissions.
Manyquarantine of our manufacturing plants useemployees, supply chain disruptions, transportation delays, cost increases, more extensive travel restrictions, closures or disruptions of businesses and facilities, or social, economic, political or labor instability in the affected areas. These same factors may continue to impact our suppliers, customers and distributors and the severity of such impacts could increase. We have implemented significant amounts of electricity generated by burning fossil fuels, which releases carbon dioxide. Federal and state courts and administrative agencies are considering the scope and scale of carbon dioxide emission regulation under various laws pertainingchanges to the environment, energy useway we work in an attempt to enhance and developmentsecure the health and greenhouse gas emissions. In addition, several statessafety of our workforce and the communities in which they operate. However, the health implications of the pandemic are considering various carbon dioxide registrationextensive and reduction programs. The final detailsthe extent, duration and scopeseverity of these various legislative, regulatory and policy measures are unclear and their potential impact is still uncertain, so we cannot fully predict the impact on our business.
The potential impacts of climate change on our operationspandemic are highly uncertain. The EPA has found that global climate changeIt is also uncertain whether the measures we have taken — and additional measures we may undertake in the future — and the actions taken by governmental agencies will be successful. Accordingly, should there be unexpected health implications for our employees, communities or others, we could increase the severityface litigation or other claims and possibly the frequency of severe weather patterns. Although the financial impact of these potential changes is not reasonably estimable at this time,we could suffer damage to our operations in certain locationsreputation, brand and those of our customers and suppliers could potentially be adversely affected,operations, which could adversely affect our sales, profitabilitybusiness.
We have incurred additional costs to address the pandemic as discussed in PART II, “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS,”, including costs associated with unfavorable volume variances, voluntary emergency paid leave, additional cleaning, disinfectants and cash flows.

sanitation materials for our employees and at our facilities. We expect to continue to incur such costs, which may be significant, as we continue to implement operational changes in response to this pandemic. All of our facilities were operational and able to fill orders on November 17, 2020, and our teams have worked effectively to address the few temporary closures we have experienced. The pandemic has also caused supply chain disruption that has resulted in higher costs in the manufacture of our products. We expect these conditions to persist for the near term and may worsen until the pandemic abates.
16
18

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Continued disruptions in our markets and the global economy may cause us to have to assess impairments of our assets and cause us to incur and record non-cash impairment charges.
Further, our management is focused on mitigating the impact of the pandemic on our operations, which has required, and will continue to require, a large investment of time and resources across our business and may delay other strategic initiatives and large capital projects that are important to the business. Additionally, many of our employees are working remotely. An extended period of remote work arrangements could strain our business continuity plans, introduce operational risk, including but not limited to cybersecurity risks, and impair our ability to manage our business.
The extent to which the pandemic impacts us will depend on a number of factors and developments that we are not able to predict or control, including, among others: the severity of the virus; the duration of the outbreak; governmental, business and other actions (which could include limits on funding for our products or services); the health of and the effect on our workforce; and the potential effects on our internal controls including those over financial reporting and information technology as a result of changes in working environments such as shelter-in-place and similar orders that are applicable to our employees, including management. In addition, if the pandemic continues to create disruptions or turmoil in the credit or financial markets, it could adversely affect our ability to access capital on favorable terms and continue to meet our liquidity needs, all of which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted.
We also cannot predict the impact that the pandemic will have on third parties with which we do business, and each of their financial conditions, including their viability and ability to pay for our products and services; however, any material effect on these parties could adversely impact us. The extent of the impact of the pandemic on our operations and financial results depends on future developments and is highly uncertain. The situation is changing rapidly and future impacts may materialize that are not yet known.
19

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Item 2.PROPERTIES
Item 2.PROPERTIES
Our principal properties are listed below.
LocationActivity
Size

  (sq.  ft.)  
Owned or

leased
Infrastructure:
Albertville, ALManufacturing422,000
Owned
Aurora, ILAriel, IsraelManufacturing147,000221,000 
OwnedLeased
Aurora, ILDistributionManufacturing84,000147,000 
LeasedOwned
Barrie, OntarioAurora, ILDistribution50,00084,000 
Leased
Brownsville, TXBarrie, OntarioManufacturingDistribution50,000
Leased
Calgary, AlbertaBrownsville, TXDistributionManufacturing11,00050,000 
Leased
Charlotte, NCCalgary, AlbertaManufacturingDistribution7,00011,000 
Leased
Chattanooga, TNManufacturing525,000
Owned
Chattanooga, TNGeneral and administration17,000
Leased
Chattanooga, TNResearch and development22,000
Leased
Cleveland, TNManufacturing109,500
Owned
Decatur, ILDallas, TXManufacturingDistribution467,00026,000 
OwnedLeased
Hammond, INDecatur, ILManufacturing51,000467,000 
Owned
Jingmen, ChinaEmporia, KSManufacturing154,00028,000 
OwnedLeased
Ontario, CAHammond, INDistributionManufacturing73,00051,000 
LeasedOwned
Jingmen, ChinaManufacturing154,000 Owned
Kimball, TNManufacturing233,000 Owned
Ocala, FLDistribution50,000 Leased
Ontario, CADistribution73,000 Leased
Surrey, British ColumbiaManufacturing33,000
Leased
Tai Cang, ChinaManufacturing19,000
Leased
Woodland, WAManufacturing20,000
Leased
Technologies:   Sharjah, United Arab EmiratesDistribution10,000 Leased
Cleveland, NCTechnologies:Manufacturing190,000
Owned
Toronto, OntarioCleveland, NCManufacturing190,000 Owned
Atlanta, GAResearch and development10,00021,000 
Leased
Corporate:Toronto, OntarioResearch and development18,000 Leased
Corporate:
Atlanta, GACorporate headquarters25,000
Leased
We consider our facilities to be well maintained and believe we have sufficient capacity to meet our anticipated needs through 2018.2021. Our leased properties have terms expiring at various dates through January 2024.2033.
20

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Item 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
We are involved in various legal proceedings that have arisen in the normal course of operations, including the proceedings summarized below.
The effect of the outcome of these matters on our future results of operationsfinancial statements cannot be predicted with certainty as any such effect depends on the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters. Other than the litigation described below,elsewhere in this annual report, we do not believe that any of our outstanding litigation would have a material adverse effect on our business or prospects.
Environmental. We are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment, both with respect to the operations at many of our properties and with respect to remediating environmental conditions that may exist at our own or other properties. We accrue for environmental expenses resulting from existing conditions that relate to past operations when the costs are probable and reasonably estimable. These expenses were $2.6 million, $3.9 million and $3.5 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. We capitalize environmental expenditures that increase the life or efficiency of long-term assets or that reduce or prevent environmental contamination. Capital expenditures for environmental requirements are anticipated to be approximately $1.8 million during 2018. Capitalized environmental-related expenditures were $0.3 million, $0.2 million and $0.6 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

17

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


In the acquisition agreement pursuant to which a predecessor to Tyco sold our businesses to a previous owner in August 1999, Tyco agreed to indemnify us and our affiliates, among other things, for all “Excluded Liabilities.” Excluded Liabilities include, among other things, substantially all liabilities related to the time prior to August 1999, including environmental liabilities. The indemnity survives indefinitely. Tyco’s indemnity does not cover liabilities to the extent caused by us or the operation of our businesses after August 1999, nor does it cover liabilities arising with respect to businesses or sites acquired after August 1999. Since 2007, Tyco has engaged in multiple corporate restructurings, split-offs and divestitures. While none of these transactions directly affects the indemnification obligations of the Tyco Indemnitors under the 1999 acquisition agreement, the result of such transactions is that the assets of, and control over, such Tyco Indemnitors has changed. Should any of these Tyco Indemnitors become financially unable or fail to comply with the terms of the indemnity, we may be responsible for such obligations or liabilities.
In September 1987, we implemented an Administrative Consent Order (“ACO”) for our Burlington, New Jersey property, which was required under the New Jersey Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act (now known as the Industrial Site Recovery Act). The ACO required soil and ground-water cleanup, and we completed, and received final approval on, the soil cleanup required by the ACO. We retained this property when we sold our former U.S. Pipe segment. We expect ground-water issues as well as issues associated with the demolition of former manufacturing facilities at this site will continue and remediation by us could be required. Long-term ground-water monitoring may also be required, but we do not know how long such monitoring would be required and do not believe monitoring or further remediation costs, if any, will have a material adverse effect on any of our financial statements.
On July 13, 2010, Rohcan Investments Limited, the former owner of property leased by Mueller Canada Ltd. and located in Milton, Ontario, filed suit against Mueller Canada Ltd. and its directors seeking C$10 million in damages arising from the defendants’ alleged environmental contamination of the property and breach of lease. Mueller Canada Ltd. leased the property from 1988 through 2008. We are pursuing indemnification from a former owner for certain potential liabilities that are alleged in this lawsuit, and we have accrued for other liabilities not covered by indemnification.  On December 7, 2011, the Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
The purchaser of U.S. Pipe has been identified as a “potentially responsible party” (“PRP”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA” which is sometimes referred to as “Superfund”) in connection with a former manufacturing facility operated by U.S. Pipe that was in the vicinity of a proposed Superfund site located in North Birmingham, Alabama. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement relating to our sale of U.S. Pipe, we agreed to indemnify the purchaser for certain environmental liabilities, including those arising out of the former manufacturing site in North Birmingham. Accordingly, the purchaser tendered the matter to us for indemnification, which we accepted. Ultimate liability for the site will depend on many factors that have not yet been determined, including the determination of whether the site will be added to the National Priorities List and designated as a “Superfund site,” EPA’s remediation costs, the number and financial viability of the other PRPs (there are four other PRPs currently) and the determination of the final allocation of the costs, if any, among the PRPs, if any. Accordingly, because the amount of such costs cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, no amounts had been accrued for this matter at September 30, 2017.
See “Item 1. BUSINESS - Regulatory and Environmental Matters,” “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS - We are subject to increasingly stringent environmental, health and safety laws and regulations that impose significant compliance costs. Any failure to satisfy these laws and regulations may adversely affect us,” “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS - Contingencies” and Note 17.18. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Walter Energy.  Each member of the Walter Energy consolidated group, which included us (including our subsidiaries) through December 14, 2006, is jointly and severally liable for the federal income tax liability of each other member of the consolidated group for any year in which it is a member of the group at any time during such year.  Accordingly, we could be liable in the event any such federal income tax liability is incurred, and not discharged, by any other member of the Walter Energy consolidated group for any period during which we were included in the Walter Energy consolidated group.
21
Walter Energy effectively controlled all of our tax decisions for periods during which we were a member of the Walter Energy consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and certain combined, consolidated or unitary state and local income tax groups.  Under the terms of an income tax allocation agreement between us and Walter Energy, dated May 26, 2006, we generally computed our tax liability on a stand-alone basis, but Walter Energy has sole authority to respond to and conduct all tax proceedings (including tax audits) relating to our federal income and combined state tax returns, to file all such tax returns on our behalf and to determine the amount of our liability to (or entitlement to payment from) Walter Energy for such previous periods.

18

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



According to Walter Energy’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 5, 2015 (“Walter November 2015 Filing”), a dispute exists with the IRS with regard to federal income taxes for years 1980 to 1994 and 1999 to 2001 allegedly owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group, which included U.S. Pipe during these periods.  As a matter of law, we are jointly and severally liable for any final tax determination, which means we would be liable in the event Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed. According to the Walter November 2015 Filing, at September 30, 2015, Walter Energy had $33.0 million of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits on the matters subject to disposition. In the Walter November 2015 Filing, Walter Energy stated it believed it had sufficient accruals to address any claims, including interest and penalties, and did not believe that any potential difference between any final settlements and amounts accrued would have a material effect on Walter Energy’s financial position, but such potential difference could be material to its results of operations in a future reporting period.
In July 2015, Walter Energy filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code before the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama (“Chapter 11 Case”). During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Case, we monitored the proceeding to determine whether we could be liable for all or a portion of this federal income tax liability if it is incurred, and not discharged, for any period during which we were included in the Walter Energy consolidated group. On January 11, 2016, the IRS filed a proof of claim (“Proof of Claim”) in the Chapter 11 Case, alleging that Walter Energy owes amounts for prior taxable periods (specifically, 1983-1994, 2000-2002 and 2005) in an aggregate amount of $554.3 million ($229.1 million of which the IRS claims is entitled to priority status in the Chapter 11 Case). The IRS asserts that its claim is based on an alleged settlement of Walter Energy’s tax liability for the 1983-1995 taxable periods in connection with Walter Energy’s prior bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida. In the Proof of Claim, the IRS included an alternative calculation in the event the alleged settlement of the prior bankruptcy court is found to be non-binding, which provides for a claim by the IRS in an aggregate amount of $860.4 million ($535.3 million of which the IRS claims is entitled to priority status in the Chapter 11 Case).
According to a current report on Form 8-K filed by Walter Energy with the SEC on April 1, 2016 (“Walter April 2016 Filing”), on March 31, 2016, Walter Energy closed on the sale of substantially all of Walter Energy’s Alabama assets pursuant to the provisions of Sections 105, 363 and 365 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code.  The Walter April 2016 Filing further stated that Walter Energy would have no further material business operations after April 1, 2016 and Walter Energy was evaluating its options with respect to the wind-down of its remaining assets.  The asset sale did not impact the Proof of Claim, and the Proof of Claim, as well as the alleged tax liability thereunder, remain unresolved.
On February 2, 2017, at the request of Walter Energy, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama signed an order converting the Chapter 11 Case to a liquidation proceeding under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to which Walter Energy will be wound-down and liquidated (“Chapter 7 Case”). In its objection contesting such conversion, the IRS indicated its intent to pursue collection of amounts included in the Proof of Claim from former members of the Walter Energy consolidated group.
We cannot predict whether or to what extent we may become liable for the tax-related amounts of the Walter Energy consolidated group asserted in the Proof of Claim, in part, because: (i) the amounts owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group for certain of the taxable periods from 1980 through 2006 remain unresolved and (ii) it is unclear what priority, if any, the IRS will receive in the Chapter 7 Case with respect to its claims against Walter Energy, and whether and to what extent funds will be available in the Chapter 7 Case to pay priority tax claims. We intend to vigorously assert any and all available defenses against any liability we may have as a member of the Walter Energy consolidated group. However, we cannot currently estimate our liability, if any, relating to the tax-related liabilities of Walter Energy’s consolidated tax group for tax years prior to 2007, and such liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.
In accordance with the income tax allocation agreement entered into in connection with our spin-off from Walter Energy, Walter Energy used certain tax assets of one of our predecessors in its calendar 2006 tax return for which payment to us is required.  The income tax allocation agreement requires, among other things, Walter Energy to make the payment upon realization of this tax benefit by receiving a refund or otherwise offsetting taxes due.  Walter Energy owed us $11.6 million that was payable pending completion of an IRS audit of Walter Energy’s 2006 tax year and the related refund of tax from that year.  As a result of the Bankruptcy Case, we wrote off this receivable during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

19

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Indemnifications. We are a party to contracts in which it is common for us to agree to indemnify third parties for certain liabilities that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the contract. In some cases, this indemnity extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but usually excludes any liabilities caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct. We cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would trigger a liability under the indemnities.
Additionally, in connection with the sale of assets and the divestiture of businesses, such as the divestitures of U.S. Pipe and Anvil, we may agree to indemnify buyers and related parties for certain losses or liabilities incurred by these parties with respect to: (i) the representations and warranties made by us to these parties in connection with the sale and (ii) liabilities related to the pre-closing operations of the assets or business sold. Indemnities related to pre-closing operations generally include certain environmental, tax and other liabilities not assumed by these parties in the transaction.
Indemnities related to the pre-closing operations of sold assets or businesses normally do not represent additional liabilities to us, but simply serve to protect these parties from potential liability associated with our obligations existing at the time of the sale. As with any liability, we have accrued for those pre-closing obligations that are considered probable and reasonably estimable. Should circumstances change, increasing the likelihood of payments related to a specific indemnity, we will accrue a liability when future payment is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable.
Other Matters. Certain Mueller Technologies radio products produced between 2011 and 2014 and installed in particularly harsh environments have been failing at higher-than-expected rates. During the quarter ended March 31, 2017, we conducted additional testing of these products and revised our estimates of related warranty expenses. Consequently, we recorded an additional warranty expense of $9.8 million associated with these products in that quarter.
We are party to a number of other lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business, including product liability cases for products manufactured by us or third parties. We provide for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. Administrative costs related to these matters are expensed as incurred. The effect of the outcome of these matters on our future financial statements cannot be predicted with certainty as any such effect depends on the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters. While the results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe the final outcome of such other litigation is not likely to have a materially adverse effect on our business or prospects.

20

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


PART II
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Item 5.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the trading symbol MWA.
Covenants contained in certain of the debt instruments described in Note 7.8. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements restrict the amount we can pay in cash dividends. Future dividends will be declared at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our future earnings, financial condition and other factors.
The range of high and low intraday sales prices of our common stock and the dividends declared per share are presented below.
 High      Low       Dividends per share  
2017     
4th quarter$12.91
 $11.14
 $0.04
3rd quarter12.91
 10.84
 0.04
2nd quarter14.00
 11.53
 0.04
1st quarter14.20
 10.45
 0.03
2016     
4th quarter13.50
 11.18
 0.03
3rd quarter11.75
 9.55
 0.03
2nd quarter9.94
 7.52
 0.02
1st quarter9.47
 7.45
 0.02
At September 30, 2017,2020, there were 10798 stockholders of record for our common stock. This figure does not include stockholders whose shares are held in street name or otherwise beneficially held.
Equity Compensation Plan Information
The information regarding our compensation plans under which equity securities are authorized for issuance is set forth in “Item 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.”
Sale of Unregistered Securities
We did not issue any unregistered securities within the past three years.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any shares of our common stock in the quarter ended September 30, 2017.2020.

21

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Stock Price Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative quarterly stock market performance of our common stock with the Russell 2000 Stock Index (“Russell 2000”) and the Dow Jones U.S. Building Materials & Fixtures Index (“DJ U.S. Building Materials & Fixtures”) since September 30, 2012.
2015. Total return values were calculated based on cumulative total return assuming (i) the investment of $100 in our common stock, the Russell 2000 and the DJ U.S. Building Materials & Fixtures on the dates indicated and (ii) reinvestment of all dividends.
mwa-20200930_g1.jpg




22

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Item 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
The selected financial and other data presented below should be read in conjunction with, and are qualified by reference to, “Item 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this annual report.
20202019201820172016
 (in millions, except per share data)
Statement of operations data:
Net sales$964.1 $968.0 $916.0 $826.0 $800.6 
Cost of sales635.9 647.1 626.1 558.1 531.7 
Gross profit328.2 320.9 289.9 267.9 268.9 
Selling, general and administrative expenses198.4 182.7 166.7 155.4 149.5 
Gain on sale of idle property— (2.4)(9.0)— — 
Other charges13.0 16.3 10.5 10.4 7.2 
Interest expense, net25.5 19.8 20.9 22.2 23.6 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt— — 6.5 — — 
Walter Energy Accrual0.2 22.0 — — — 
Pension costs (benefit) other than service(3.0)0.4 1.0 1.4 19.3 
Gain on settlement of interest rate swap contracts— — (2.4)— — 
Income before income taxes94.1 82.1 95.7 78.5 69.3 
Income tax expense (benefit)22.1 18.3 (9.9)24.2 24.2 
Income from continuing operations72.0 63.8 105.6 54.3 45.1 
Discontinued operations(1)
— — — 69.0 18.8 
Net income$72.0 $63.8 $105.6 $123.3 $63.9 
Earnings per basic share:
Continuing operations$0.46 $0.40 $0.67 $0.34 $0.28 
Discontinued operations(1)
— — — 0.43 0.12 
Net income$0.46 $0.40 $0.67 $0.77 $0.40 
Earnings per diluted share:
Continuing operations$0.45 $0.40 $0.66 $0.34 $0.28 
Discontinued operations(1)
— — — 0.42 0.12 
Net income$0.45 $0.40 $0.66 $0.76 $0.39 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic157.8 157.8 158.2 160.1 161.3 
Diluted158.6 159.0 159.7 161.8 163.4 
Balance sheet data (at September 30):
Cash and cash equivalents$208.9 $176.7 $347.1 $361.7 $195.0 
Working capital426.2 388.4 518.4 528.7 426.5 
Property, plant and equipment, net253.8 217.1 150.9 122.3 108.4 
Total assets1,395.0 1,337.3 1,291.9 1,258.3 1,280.6 
Total debt447.6 446.3 445.0 480.6 484.4 
Long-term liabilities599.3 566.5 560.0 627.2 675.3 
Total liabilities754.3 745.0 727.1 768.8 861.1 
Total equity640.7 592.3 564.8 489.5 419.5 
Other data (year ended September 30):
Depreciation and amortization57.8 53.0 43.7 41.9 39.5 
Capital expenditures67.7 86.6 55.7 40.6 31.5 
Cash dividends declared per share0.2100 0.2025 0.190 0.150 0.100 
  2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
  (in millions, except per share data)
Statement of operations data:          
Net sales $826.0
 $800.6
 $793.4
 $783.3
 $729.5
Cost of sales 558.5
 532.7
 547.1
 548.2
 528.4
Gross profit 267.5
 267.9
 246.3
 235.1
 201.1
Selling, general and administrative expenses 156.4
 151.2
 146.7
 151.0
 143.7
Pension settlement 
 16.6
 0.5
 
 
Loss on Walter receivable 
 
 11.6
 
 
Other charges 10.4
 7.2
 7.9
 3.1
 1.4
Interest expense, net 22.2
 23.6
 27.5
 49.6
 51.6
Loss on early extinguishment of debt 
 
 31.3
 1.0
 1.4
Income before income taxes 78.5

69.3

20.8

30.4

3.0
Income tax expense 24.2
 24.2
 8.3
 1.5
 8.2
Income (loss) from continuing operations 54.3
 45.1
 12.5
 28.9
 (5.2)
Discontinued operations(1)
 69.0
 18.8
 18.4
 26.6
 46.0
Net income (loss) $123.3
 $63.9
 $30.9
 $55.5
 $40.8
Earnings (loss) per basic share:          
Continuing operations $0.34
 $0.28
 $0.08
 $0.18
 $(0.03)
Discontinued operations(1)
 0.43
 0.12
 0.11
 0.17
 0.29
Net income (loss) $0.77
 $0.40
 $0.19
 $0.35
 $0.26
Earnings (loss) per diluted share:          
Continuing operations $0.34
 $0.28
 $0.08
 $0.18
 $(0.03)
Discontinued operations(1)
 0.42
 0.11
 0.11
 0.16
 0.28
Net income (loss) $0.76
 $0.39
 $0.19
 $0.34
 $0.25
Weighted average shares outstanding:          
Basic 160.1
 161.3
 160.5
 159.2
 157.7
Diluted 161.8
 163.4
 163.2
 162.2
 160.3
Balance sheet data (at September 30):          
Cash and cash equivalents $361.7
 $195.0
 $113.1
 $161.1
 $121.7
Working capital 528.7
 426.5
 381.5
 363.0
 386.3
Property, plant and equipment, net 122.3
 108.4
 100.0
 96.2
 90.7
Total assets 1,258.3
 1,280.6
 1,229.8
 1,312.5
 1,275.9
Total debt 480.6
 484.4
 488.3
 540.3
 593.9
Long-term liabilities 627.2
 675.3
 694.0
 716.5
 764.6
Total liabilities 768.8
 861.1
 862.0
 960.9
 947.7
Total equity 489.5
 419.5
 367.8
 351.6
 328.2
Other data (year ended September 30):          
Depreciation and amortization(2)
 41.9
 39.5
 43.4
 42.5
 45.0
Capital expenditures(2)
 40.6
 31.5
 27.2
 25.3
 24.2
Cash dividends declared per share 0.150
 0.100
 0.075
 0.070
 0.070
(1)In 2017, we sold Anvil. The results of its operations and the gain on the sale of Anvil are classified as discontinued operations for 2016 and 2017, as applicable.
(1)
In 2017, we sold Anvil. In 2012, we sold U.S. Pipe. The results of their operations and the gain on the sale of Anvil are classified as discontinued operations for 2017 through 2013, as applicable.
(2)
Excludes discontinued operations in 2017 through 2013.

23

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Item 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto that appear elsewhere in this annual report.
Overview
Organization Updates
On OctoberDecember 3, 2005, Walter Energy acquired all outstanding shares of capital stock representing the Mueller Co. and Anvil businesses and contributed them to its U.S. Pipe business to form the Company. In June 2006,2018, we completed an initial public offeringour acquisition of common stockKrausz Industries Development Ltd. and in December 2006, Walter Energy distributed to its shareholders allsubsidiaries (“Krausz”), a manufacturer of its equity interestspipe couplings, grips and clamps with operations in the Company, completingUnited States and Israel, for $140.7 million, net of cash acquired, including the assumption and simultaneous repayment of certain debt of $13.2 million. The acquisition of Krausz was financed with cash on hand. The results of Krausz are included within our spin-off.Infrastructure segment for all periods following the acquisition date.
In October 2019, we acquired the noncontrolling interest of our previously existing joint venture operation for a payment of $5.2 million to our joint venture partner.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, whenever we refer to a particular year, we mean our fiscal year ended or ending September 30 in that particular calendar year.
Business
We operate our business through two segments, Infrastructure formerly referred to as Mueller Co., and Technologies, formerly referred to as Mueller Technologies.
We expect our primary end markets, repair and replacement of water infrastructure, driven by municipal spending, and new water infrastructure installation, driven by residential construction, to grow in 2018. We expect the residential construction market to be the faster growing.
Infrastructure
We estimate approximately 60% to 65% of Infrastructure’s 2017the Company’s 2020 net sales were forassociated with repair and replacement directly related to municipal water infrastructure spending, approximately 25% to 30% were related to residential construction activity and approximatelyless than 10% were related to natural gas utilities.
We expect the operating environment to continue to be very challenging, due to the uncertainty around the depth and duration of the pandemic in fiscal 2021. We anticipate that growth in the residential construction end market will help offset anticipated challenges in the project-related portion of the municipal end market.
Infrastructure
Municipal spending in 20162020 was relatively strongimpacted by the pandemic in the second half of our year, and although the industry recovered towards the end of our fiscal year as compared with the prior year, and economic forecasts predicted this trend would continue. However, we believe municipal spending was down year over year in 2017.uncertainty remains related to the pandemic. According to the U.S. Bureau of Economic Analysis, state and local tax receipts for the quarter ended September 30, 20172020 were updown year-over-year and, accordingprimarily due to pandemic conditions. According to the U.S. Department of Labor, the trailing twelve-month average consumer price index for water and sewerage rates at September 30, 20172020 increased 3.9%3.3%. However, water conservation efforts particularly in areas impacted by recent drought conditions,and the economic effects of the pandemic have resulted in lower overall receipts for some U.S. water utilities.
The year-over-year percentage change in housing starts is a key indicator of demand for Infrastructure’s products sold in the residential construction market. In September 2017, Zelman & AssociatesOctober 2020, Blue Chip Economic Indicators forecasted a 6%4.5% increase in housing starts for calendar 2018 compared to the prior year. In October 2017, Blue Chip Economic Indicators forecasted a 7% increase in housing starts for calendar 20182021 compared to the prior year.
Technologies
The municipal market is the key end market for theTechnologies. The businesses in Technologies companies. These businesses are primarily project-oriented and depend on customer adoption of their technology-based products and services. We entered 20182021 with a backlog of $23.2$48.2 million at Mueller Systems, largely for AMI products, some of which will ship in 2022 and with higher volume of projects awarded for Echologics.beyond.
Consolidated
OverallFor our fiscal year 2021, we anticipate that consolidated net sales will be between flat and 3 percent higher than the prior year as we believe that continued strong growth in 2018the residential construction end market will offset any challenges in the project-related areas of our business. In 2020, we benefited from declining costs for Mueller Water Products,raw materials, particularly brass ingot and scrap steel but we expect year-over-year net sales percentage growth between 4% and 7%. We expect higher operating income and for productivity improvements to increase operating margin. We expect a conversion margin of 35% to 40% of our net sales growth.inflation in raw material costs in 2021.

24

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Results of Operations
Year Ended September 30, 20172020 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 20162019
Year ended September 30, 2017 Year ended September 30, 2020
Infrastructure Technologies Corporate   Total     InfrastructureTechnologiesCorporateTotal
(in millions) (in millions)
Net sales$739.9
 $86.1
 $
 $826.0
Net sales$885.5 $78.6 $— $964.1 
Gross profit$259.5
 $8.0
 $
 $267.5
Gross profit316.4 11.8 — $328.2 
Operating expenses:       Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative93.4
 27.6
 35.4
 156.4
Selling, general and administrative129.1 24.8 44.5 198.4 
Other charges2.7
 0.7
 7.0
 10.4
Other charges0.6 0.1 12.3 13.0 
96.1
 28.3
 42.4
 166.8
129.7 24.9 56.8 211.4 
Operating income (loss)$163.4
 $(20.3) $(42.4) 100.7
Operating income (loss)$186.7 $(13.1)$(56.8)116.8 
Pension benefit other than servicePension benefit other than service(3.0)
Interest expense, net      22.2
Interest expense, net25.5 
Walter Energy AccrualWalter Energy Accrual0.2 
Income before income taxes      78.5
Income before income taxes94.1 
Income tax expense      24.2
Income tax expense22.1 
Income from continuing operations      $54.3
Net incomeNet income$72.0 
       
Year ended September 30, 2016 Year ended September 30, 2019
Infrastructure Technologies Corporate Total InfrastructureTechnologiesCorporateTotal
(in millions) (in millions)
Net sales$715.7
 $84.9
 $
 $800.6
Net sales$871.0 $97.0 $— $968.0 
Gross profit$250.7
 $17.2
 $
 $267.9
Gross profit$302.9 $18.0 $— $320.9 
Operating expenses:       Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative88.4
 27.4
 35.4
 151.2
Selling, general and administrative121.3 26.7 34.7 182.7 
Pension settlement2.2
 
 14.4
 16.6
Gain on sale of idle propertyGain on sale of idle property(2.4)— — (2.4)
Other charges0.8
 0.9
 5.5
 7.2
Other charges1.7 — 14.6 16.3 
91.4
 28.3
 55.3
 175.0
120.6 26.7 49.3 196.6 
Operating income (loss)$159.3
 $(11.1) $(55.3) 92.9
Operating income (loss)$182.3 $(8.7)$(49.3)124.3 
Pension costs other than servicePension costs other than service0.4 
Interest expense, net      23.6
Interest expense, net19.8 
Walter Energy AccrualWalter Energy Accrual22.0 
Income before income taxes      69.3
Income before income taxes82.1 
Income tax expense      24.2
Income tax expense18.3 
Income from continuing operations      $45.1
Net incomeNet income$63.8 
Consolidated Analysis
Net sales for 2017 increased 3.2%2020 decreased 0.4% to $826.0$964.1 million from $800.6$968.0 million in the prior year due primarily to higher shipment volumes of $15.4 million and $10.3 million in net sales of Singer Valve, which we acquired in February 2017.
Gross profit was $267.5 million for 2017 and $267.9 million in the prior year. Gross margin declined 110 basis points to 32.4% in 2017 from 33.5% in the prior year primarily due to a discrete warranty chargelower volume at both segments, which were impacted by the pandemic, partially offset by $18.2 million higher pricing across both segments and the inclusion of $9.8first quarter 2020 net sales of Krausz, which we acquired in December of 2018.
Gross profit was $328.2 million at Technologies.for 2020 and $320.9 million in the prior year and gross margin increased to 34.0% in 2020 from 33.2% in the prior year. These increases were primarily due to Krausz gross profit and higher pricing exceeding cost inflation in the current year. Current year gross profit was reduced by $9.5 million due to pandemic-related costs and production inefficiencies and prior year gross profit was reduced by $6.8 million in Krausz inventory amortization costs.
Selling, general and administrative expenses (“SG&A”) increased 3.4%8.6% to $156.4$198.4 million for 20172020 from $151.2$182.7 million in the prior year, but was 18.9% as a percentand increased 170 basis points to 20.6% of net sales for both years.from 18.9% of net sales in the prior year. The increase in SG&A was primarily due to the acquisitionaddition of Singer Valve.SG&A of Krausz in the first quarter and increased personnel-related and information technology costs, which were offset by pandemic-driven temporary benefits of $6.8 million resulting from reduced travel, trade show and event spending as well as temporary employee furloughs and temporary salary reductions.
25

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Other charges for 20172020 consisted primarily of costs related to the settlement of the Siemens litigation, our previously announced strategic reorganizationreorganizations, the retirement of an executive, and costs associated with the acquisition of Singer Valve. For 2016,Krausz. In 2019, other charges consisted primarily of costs associated withrelated to our previously announced strategic reorganizations, the demolitionAurora tragedy and the acquisition of Krausz, net of a surplus facility.
In June 2016, our U.S. pension plan completed a pension benefit settlement program. Lump-sum distributions to fully settle existing obligations were offered to all vested participants who are no longer working for us and not yet receiving benefits. Approximately 75%gain on sale of these participants accepted the offer. As a result, the plan disbursed $58.5 million and we recorded a non-cash pension settlement charge of $16.6 million.

25

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


an idle property in Quebec, Canada.
Interest expense, net declined $1.4increased $5.7 million in 20172020 from the prior year primarily as a result of reduced interest income earned on the cash proceeds from the sale of Anvil. Interest expense associated with the Term Loan decreased due to lower interest rates and a non-cash adjustment to capitalized interest in the repricing we completed in February 2017, which reduced the applicable interest rate spread by 75 basis points.current year. The components of interest expense, net are provided below.
20202019
2017 2016 (in millions)
(in millions)
Term Loan$19.1
 $20.5
Interest rate swap contracts1.9
 
5.5% Senior Notes5.5% Senior Notes$24.8 $24.8 
Deferred financing costs amortization1.8
 1.9
Deferred financing costs amortization1.2 1.2 
ABL Agreement0.8
 1.1
ABL Agreement0.6 0.6 
Other interest expense0.6
 0.5
Capitalized interestCapitalized interest(0.3)(3.0)
Other interest expense (income)Other interest expense (income)0.3 (0.2)
24.2
 24.0
26.6 23.3 
Interest income(2.0) (0.4)Interest income(1.1)(3.5)
$22.2
 $23.6
$25.5 $19.8 
Income tax expense of $22.1 million in 2020 was $24.2 million for both 2017 and 2016, but theat an effective income tax rate decreased to 30.8% in 2017 from 34.9%of 23.5%, which was higher than the 22.3% rate in the prior year, primarily due to increased domestic manufacturing deductions and excesswhich included tax benefits related to stock compensation.the Walter Energy tax matter and U.S. federal transition tax.
Segment Analysis
Infrastructure
Net sales for 20172020 increased 3.4%1.7% to $739.9$885.5 million from $715.7$871.0 million in the prior year. Net sales increased primarily due to higher shipment volumesfavorable pricing of $14.0$16.6 million and $10.3 million ininclusion of first quarter 2020 Krausz net sales, of Singer Valve, which we acquired in February 2017. Domestic shipments of valves, hydrants and brass products increased 1.7% in 2017 compared to 2016.offset lower organic volume.
Gross profit for 20172020 increased 3.5%4.5% to $259.5$316.4 million from $250.7$302.9 million in the prior year primarily due to increased shipment volumes.favorable sales pricing and Krausz gross profit, partially offset by $8.0 million due to pandemic-related costs and production inefficiencies. Gross profit in 2019 was reduced by $6.8 million of Krausz inventory fair value amortization. Gross margin was 35.1% for 2017 and 35.0%35.7% in 2020, a 90 basis point improvement versus 34.8% in the prior year.
SG&A in 20172020 increased 5.7%6.4% to $93.4$129.1 million from $88.4$121.3 million in the prior year primarily due to the inclusion of Krausz SG&A in the first quarter and increased personnel-related and information technology costs, which were partially offset by $5.4 million in temporary pandemic-driven savings resulting from reduced travel, trade show and the acquisition of Singer Valve.event spending as well as temporary employee furloughs and temporary salary reductions. SG&A was 12.6%14.6% and 12.4%13.9% of net sales for 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively.
Technologies
Net sales in 2017 increased2020 decreased to $86.1$78.6 million from $84.9$97.0 million in the prior year primarily due to $1.4 millionlower shipment volumes at both Echologics and Mueller Systems due to timing of large customer orders in the prior year and the effects of the pandemic, which were partially offset by higher shipment volumes.prices.
Gross profit in 20172020 decreased $9.2$6.2 million to $8.0$11.8 million from $17.2$18.0 million in the prior year. Gross margin declineddecreased to 9.3%15.0% in 20172020 from 20.3%18.6% in the prior year. These decreases areGross profit and gross margin were primarily duereduced by lower volumes as well as $1.5 million of pandemic-related costs and production inefficiencies.
SG&A decreased to the $9.8 million warranty charge related to certain radio products produced between 2011 and 2014, which we recorded in our second quarter.
SG&A was $27.6$24.8 million in 2017 and $27.42020 from $26.7 million in the prior year.year primarily due to temporary reduced travel, trade show and event expenses as well as reduced personnel-related expenses. SG&A as a percentage of net sales decreased to 32.1%was 31.6% for 2017 from 32.3%2020 and 27.5% in the prior year.
Corporate
SG&A was $35.4$44.5 million in both 20172020 and 2016.$34.7 million 2019. SG&A was higher in 2020 due to increased personnel-related costs and information technology costs, which were offset by pandemic-driven benefits resulting from temporary reduced travel, trade show and event spending as well as temporary employee furloughs and temporary salary reductions.

26

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Year Ended September 30, 20162019 Compared to Year Ended September 30, 20152018
 Year ended September 30, 2016
 Infrastructure Technologies Corporate   Total    
 (in millions)
Net sales$715.7
 $84.9
 $
 $800.6
Gross profit$250.7
 $17.2
 $
 $267.9
Operating expenses:       
Selling, general and administrative88.4
 27.4
 35.4
 151.2
Pension settlement2.2
 
 14.4
 16.6
Other charges0.8
 0.9
 5.5
 7.2
 91.4
 28.3
 55.3
 175.0
Operating income (loss)$159.3
 $(11.1) $(55.3) 92.9
Interest expense, net      23.6
Income before income taxes      69.3
Income tax expense      24.2
Income from continuing operations      $45.1
        
 Year ended September 30, 2015
 Infrastructure Technologies Corporate Total
 (in millions)
Net sales$702.2
 $91.2
 $
 $793.4
Gross profit$229.2
 $17.1
 $
 $246.3
Operating expenses:      
Selling, general and administrative83.8
 29.9
 33.0
 146.7
Loss on Walter Receivable
 
 11.6
 11.6
Pension settlement0.2
 
 0.3
 0.5
Other charges8.2
 0.1
 (0.4) 7.9
 92.2

30.0
 44.5

166.7
Operating income (loss)$137.0

$(12.9) $(44.5)
79.6
Interest expense, net      27.5
Loss on early extinguishment of debt      31.3
Income before income taxes      20.8
Income tax expense      8.3
Income from continuing operations      $12.5
ConsolidatedManagement’s Discussion and Analysis
Net sales comparing the results for 2016 increased to $800.6 million from $793.4 million in the prior year due primarily to higher shipment volumes of $12.4 million, which were partially offset by unfavorable changes in Canadian currency exchange rates of $3.6 million and in pricing.
Gross profit for 2016 increased to $267.9 million from $246.3 million in the prior year. Gross margin increased 250 basis points to 33.5% in 2016 from 31.0% in the prior year due primarily to lower raw material and other costs.
SG&A for 2016 increased to $151.2 million from $146.7 million in the prior year. SG&A as a percentage of net sales increased to 18.9% in 2016 from 18.5% in the prior year.
In June 2016, our U.S. pension plan completed a pension benefit settlement program. Lump-sum distributions to fully settle existing obligations were offered to all vested participants who are no longer working for us and not yet receiving benefits. Approximately 75% of these participants accepted the offer. As a result, the plan disbursed $58.5 million and we recorded a non-cash pension settlement charge of $16.6 million.

27

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We had a tax-related receivable from Walter Energy from prior to our spin-off from Walter in December 2006. Walter filed a petition for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code in July 2015. As a result of this petition, we wrote off this receivable in 2015.
Interest expense, net declined $3.9 million in 2016 comparedended September 30, 2019 to the priorresults for the year due primarily toended September 30, 2018 can be found in our Form 10-K for the debt refinancing we completed in November 2014, which replaced the Senior Subordinated Notes and the Senior Unsecured Notes with the lower-rate Term Loan. The components of interest expense, net are provided below.year ended September 30, 2019.
 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Term Loan$20.5
 $17.5
7.375% Senior Subordinated Notes
 4.0
8.75% Senior Unsecured Notes
 2.4
Deferred financing costs amortization1.9
 2.0
ABL Agreement1.1
 1.7
Other interest expense0.5
 0.2
 24.0
 27.8
Interest income(0.4) (0.3)
 $23.6
 $27.5
Segment Analysis
Infrastructure
Net sales for 2016 increased to $715.7 million from $702.2 million in the prior year. Net sales increased primarily due to higher shipment volumes of $18.8 million, but this was partially offset by unfavorable changes in Canadian currency exchange rates of $3.6 million and pricing. Domestic shipments of valves, hydrants and brass products increased 6.4% in 2016 compared to 2015.
Gross profit for 2016 increased to $250.7 million from $229.2 million in the prior year. Gross profit for 2016 increased primarily due to lower raw material costs, increased shipment volumes, and improved overhead absorption resulting from increased production. Gross margin increased to 35.0% for 2016 compared to 32.6% in the prior year. Gross margin improved primarily due to lower raw material costs, improved overhead absorption and more favorable product mix.
SG&A in 2016 increased to $88.4 million compared to $83.8 million in the prior year primarily due to personnel-related costs. SG&A were 12.4% and 11.9% of net sales for 2016 and 2015, respectively.
During 2015, Infrastructure ceased operations at a foundry in Canada that primarily produced commodity municipal castings. This resulted in a loss of $7.2 million, which comprised most of the total other charges of $8.2 million recorded during the year.
Technologies
Net sales in 2016 decreased to $84.9 million from $91.2 million in the prior year due to $6.4 million of lower shipment volumes. The decrease in sales volume was primarily due to the loss of a single customer's AMR purchases from 2015, which was partially offset by increases in sales of AMI products and mobile and fixed leak detection solutions.
Gross profit was essentially flat at $17.2 million in 2016 compared to $17.1 million in the prior year. Gross margin increased to 20.3% in 2016 compared to 18.8% in the prior year due primarily to favorable product mix, particularly the partial replacement of AMR sales with higher-margin AMI sales.
SG&A decreased to $27.4 million in 2016 compared to $29.9 million in the prior year. SG&A decreased primarily due to personnel-related cost savings. SG&A decreased to 32.3% of net sales for 2016 from 32.8% of net sales in the prior year.
Corporate
SG&A increased to $35.4 million in 2016 from $33.0 million in the prior year primarily due to higher personnel-related expenses.

28

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Financial Condition
Cash and cash equivalents were $361.7$208.9 million at September 30, 20172020 and $195.0$176.7 million at September 30, 2016.2019. Cash proceeds received from the sale of Anvil were $305.7 million. In addition to these proceeds, cash and cash equivalents increased during 2017 as a result of2020 due to increased cash provided byfrom operating activities, of $59.4 million, which wasbenefited from targeted efforts to reduce inventory levels, cost control measures put in place in response to the pandemic, and pandemic-related savings on travel trade show and event spending. These increases were partially offset primarily by cash used in investing activities of $66.3 million, primarily capital expenditures of $67.7 million, dividend payments of $33.1 million and settlement of the acquisitionWalter tax matter of Singer Valve, and cash used in financing activities of $81.4 million, primarily our share repurchases and dividend payments. Cash and cash equivalents also increased by $1.2 million during 2017 due to changes in currency exchange rates.$22.0 million.
Receivables net were $145.3$180.8 million at September 30, 20172020 and $131.8$172.8 million million at September 30, 2016. Receivables at September 30, 2017 and September 30, 2016 represented approximately 64 and 60 days net sales, respectively.2019. The timing of shipments within each year, primarily within the fourth quarters, primarily caused this increase.
Inventories were $138.9$162.5 million at September 30, 20172020 and $130.7$191.4 million at September 30, 2016.2019. Inventories increaseddecreased during 20172020 due primarily due to the acquisition of Singer Valve.targeted efforts to reduce inventory levels.
Property, plant and equipment, net was $122.3$253.8 million at September 30, 20172020 and $108.4$217.1 million at September 30, 2016,2019, and depreciation expense was $19.8$29.6 million in 20172020 compared to $18.3$26.0 million in 2016.2019. Property, plant and equipment increased primarily due to our previously-announced capital expansion projects in Chattanooga and Kimball, Tennessee and Decatur, Illinois. Capital expenditures, including external-use software development costs capitalized and capitalized interest, were $40.6$67.7 million in 2017.2020. Depreciation expense is higher due to the generally higher level of capital expenditures over the last three years.
Intangible assets were $439.3$408.9 million at September 30, 20172020 and $434.6$433.7 million at September 30, 2016.2019. Finite-lived intangible assets, $159.6$137.2 million of net book value at September 30, 2017,2020, are amortized over their estimated useful lives. Thislives, with amortization expense was $22.1of $28.2 million during 2017 and is expectedin 2020 compared to be$27.0 million in 2019. We expect amortization expense of these assets will range from approximately $22$26 million to $24approximately $28 million in each of the next five years.four years with a decrease to approximately $6 million in fiscal 2025. Indefinite-lived intangible assets, $279.7$271.6 million at September 30, 2017,2020, are not amortized, but tested at least annually for possible impairment.
Accounts payable and other current liabilities were $136.0 million, which included the liabilities of Singer Valve, at September 30, 2017 and $135.4$153.9 million at September 30, 2016 .
Net outstanding borrowings were $480.62020 and $177.6 million at September 30, 20172019. Payables decreased during 2020 due primarily to the settlement of the Walter tax matter and $484.4by the timing of other payments.
Outstanding debt was $447.6 million at September 30, 2016.2020 and $446.3 million at September 30, 2019.
Deferred income taxes were net liabilities of $114.0$96.3 million at September 30, 20172020 and net liabilities of $108.8$87.9 million at September 30, 2016.2019. The $5.2$8.4 million increase in the net liability was primarily due to a decrease in thereduced deferred tax assetassets related pension plans after the 2017 pension contribution. Deferredto inventory and increased deferred tax liabilities related to plant, property and equipment due to tax “bonus depreciation,” net of reductions in deferred tax liabilities related to intangible assets and other were $158.4 million and $180.8 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.assets. Net deferred tax liabilities are primarily related to intangible assets.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We amended our term loan credit agreement in February, which reduced the applicable interest rate spread by 75 basis points.
We had cash and cash equivalents of $361.7$208.9 million at September 30, 20172020 and approximately $113$134 million of additional borrowing capacity under our ABL Agreement based on September 30, 20172020 data. Undistributed earnings from our subsidiaries in Israel, Canada and China are considered to be permanently invested outside of the United States. At September 30, 2017,2020, cash and cash equivalents included $15.1$18.8 million, $17.0 million, and $7.5$6.4 million in Israel, Canada and China, respectively.
On January 6, 2017, we sold Anvil to affiliates of One Equity Partners for cash proceeds of $305.7 million and the agreement by the purchaser to reimburse us for expenditures to settle certain previously existing liabilities.
In 2017, we acquired Singer Valve, a manufacturer of automatic control valves, and its affiliates that distribute Singer Valve products in the U.S. and China for an aggregate cash consideration of $26.6 million net of post-closing adjustments. Singer Valve is included in Infrastructure.
Cash flows from operating activities are categorized below.
2017 201620202019
(in millions) (in millions)
Collections from customers$816.6
 $788.1
Collections from customers$956.6 $966.6 
Disbursements, other than interest and income taxes(705.8) (625.4)Disbursements, other than interest and income taxes(754.7)(822.8)
Walter tax matter paymentWalter tax matter payment(22.0)— 
Interest payments, net(19.5) (21.1)Interest payments, net(24.3)(22.2)
Income tax payments, net(31.9) (27.1)Income tax payments, net(15.3)(29.1)
Cash provided by operating activities$59.4
 $114.5
Cash provided by operating activities$140.3 $92.5 
29
27

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



We collected $28.5$10.0 million moreless cash from customers in 20172020 than in 2016,2019, which is relatively consistent withwas primarily caused by timing of shipments between years as well as the $25.4$3.9 million increasedecrease in net sales in 20172020 compared with 2016.2019.
We disbursed $46.1 million less cash excluding interest and income taxes in 2020 than in 2019, largely due to our target efforts to reduce inventory, pandemic-related liquidity preservation and cost containment actions such as deferral of some capital expenditures, reduced travel, trade show and spending, and temporary furloughs and temporary salary reductions.
Capital expenditures were $40.6$67.7 million during 20172020 and $31.5$86.6 million during 2016.2019. We estimate 20182021 capital expenditures will be $38between $80 million and $90 million. We expect our capital expenditures will be higher over the next several years as we invest more in our machinery, equipment and facilities for product introductions, enhanced productivity and maintenance. At September 30, 2020, we have completed our large casting foundry in Chattanooga, Tennessee, begun the construction of a new brass foundry in Decatur, Illinois that will replace our existing foundry in Decatur, and are building out our facility in Kimball, Tennessee to $44 million.
While we were not requiredleverage our large casting foundry and to make any contributions to our U.S. pension plan in 2017, we made a voluntary contribution of $35 million. The proportion of the assets held by our U.S. pension plan invested in fixed income securities, instead of equity securities, has increased over historical levels. Because of this shift in the strategic asset allocation, the estimated rate of return on pension plan assets has decreased, which could ultimately cause our pension expenseinsource various parts and our required contributions to this plan to increase.components.
Income tax payments were higherlower during 20172020 compared to the prior year due toprimarily because the timing of ourWalter tax matter, which had been expensed in 2019 for book purposes, was deducted as an expense in determining 2020 taxable income and our required quarterly payments.because it was paid in 2020. We expect the effective tax rate in 20182021 to be between 33%24% and 35%26%.
In2015,In 2015, we announced the authorization of a stock repurchase program for up to $50.0 million of our common stock. The program does not commit us to any particular timing or quantity of purchases, and we may suspend or discontinue the program at any time. In 2015, we acquired 523,851 shares of our common stock through open market purchases. In 2017, we announced an increase in the authorization of thethis program to $250 millionmillion. We acquired 418,374 and acquired 4,581,2271,074,234 shares of our common stock.stock in 2020 and 2019, respectively. At September 30, 2017,2020, we had remaining authorization of $190.0$145.0 million to repurchase shares of our common stock. We temporarily suspended the share repurchase program in March due to the pandemic; however, we announced in November 2020 that we have ended the suspension.
We anticipate our existing cash, cash equivalents and borrowing capacity combined with our expected operating cash flows will be sufficient to meet our anticipated operating expenses,needs, capital expenditures and debt service obligations as they become due through September 30, 2018.2021. However, our ability to make these payments will depend partly upon our future operating performance, which will be affected by general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, business and other factors beyond our control.
ABL Agreement
At September 30, 2017,2020, the ABL Agreement consisted of a revolving credit facility for up to $225$175 million of revolving credit borrowings, swing line loans and letters of credit. The ABL Agreement permits us to increase the size of the credit facility by an additional $150 million in certain circumstances subject to adequate borrowing base availability.circumstances. We may borrow up to $25 million through swing line loans and may have up to $60 million of letters of credit outstanding.
At July 30, 2020, the maturity of the ABL Agreement was extended to July 29, 2025. Borrowings under the amended ABL Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 125200 to 150225 basis points, or a base rate, as defined in the ABL Agreement, plus a margin ranging from 25100 to 50125 basis points. At September 30, 2017,2020, the applicable LIBOR-based margin was 125200 basis points.
The ABL Agreement terminates on July 13, 2021. We pay a commitment fee for any unused borrowing capacity under the amended ABL Agreement of 2537.5 basis points per annum.annually, on undrawn amounts.
The amended ABL Agreement is subject to mandatory prepayments if total outstanding borrowings under the ABL Agreement are greater than the aggregate commitments under the revolving credit facility or if we dispose of overdue accounts receivable in certain circumstances. The borrowing base under the ABL Agreement is equal to the sum of (a) 85% of the value of eligible accounts receivable and (b) the lesser of (i) 70% of the value of eligible inventory or (ii) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of the value of eligible inventory, less certain reserves. Prepayments can be made at any time with no penalty.
Substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries are borrowers under the ABL Agreement and are jointly and severally liable for any outstanding borrowings. Our obligations under the ABL Agreement are secured by a first-priority perfected lien on all of our U.S. inventory, accounts receivable, certain cash and other supporting obligations.
28

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Borrowings are not subject to any financial maintenance covenants unless excess availability is less than the greater of $17.5 million and 10% of the Loan Cap as defined in the ABL Agreement. The ABL Agreement contains customary negative covenants and restrictions on our ability to engage in specified activities, such as:
Limitations on other debt, liens, investments and guarantees;
Restrictions on dividends and redemptions of our capital stock and prepayments and redemptions of debt; and
Restrictions on mergers and acquisition, sales of assets and transactions with affiliates.

5.5% Senior Unsecured Notes
30

TableOn June 12, 2018, we privately issued $450.0 million of Contents
Index5.5% Senior Unsecured Notes (“Notes”), which mature in June 2026 and bear interest at 5.5%, paid semi-annually. Substantially all of our U.S. Subsidiaries guarantee the Notes, which are subordinate to Financial Statements


Term Loan
We had $486.3 million face value outstandingborrowings under the Term LoanABL. Based on quoted market prices, the outstanding Notes had a fair value of $465.8 million at September 30, 2017. Term Loan borrowings accrue interest2020.
An indenture securing the Notes (“Indenture”) contains customary covenants and events of default, including covenants that limit our ability to incur debt, pay dividends, and make investments. We believe we were compliant with these covenants at a floating rate equalSeptember 30, 2020 and expect to LIBOR, subject to a floor of 0.75%, plus 250 basis points. remain in compliance through September 30, 2021.
We may voluntarily repay amounts borrowed underredeem some or all of the Term LoanNotes at any time. Thetime or from time to time prior to June 15, 2021 at certain “make-whole” redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture) and on or afterJune 15, 2021 at specified redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture). Additionally, we may redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the Term Loan isNotes at any time or from time to time prior to June 15, 2021 with the net proceeds of specified equity offerings at specified redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture). Upon a change of control (as defined in the Indenture), we will be required to be repaid in quarterly installments of $1.225 million. The Term Loan matures on November 25, 2021. The Term Loan is guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries and secured by essentially all of our assets, althoughmake an offer to purchase the ABL Agreement hasNotes at a senior claim on certain collateral securing borrowings thereunder.
As described more fully in Note 8.price equal to 101% of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we entered into interest rate swap contracts in April 2015 that hedge interest payments on $150 millionoutstanding principal amount of our Term Loan borrowings from September 30, 2016 through September 30, 2021.the Notes.
Credit Ratings
Our corporate credit rating and the credit ratingratings for our debt and outlook are presented below.
 Moody’sStandard & Poor’s
September 30,September 30,
2020201920202019
Corporate credit ratingBa2Ba2BBBB
ABL AgreementNot ratedNot ratedNot ratedNot rated
NotesBa3Ba3BBBB
OutlookStableStableStableStable
 Moody’s   Standard & Poor’s
 September 30, September 30,
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Corporate credit ratingBa3 Ba3 BB- BB-
ABL AgreementNot rated Not rated Not rated Not rated
Term LoanBa3 Ba3 BB BB
OutlookStable Stable Stable Stable

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We do not have any relationships with unconsolidated entities or financial partnerships, such as entities often referred to as structured finance or special purpose entities, which would have been established for the purpose of facilitating off-balance sheet arrangements or other contractually narrow or limited purposes. In addition, we do not have any undisclosed borrowings or debt or any derivative contracts other than those described in “Item 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK” or synthetic leases. Therefore, we are not exposed to any financing, liquidity, market or credit risk that could have arisen had we engaged in such relationships.
We use letters of credit and surety bonds in the ordinary course of business to ensure the performance of contractual obligations. At September 30, 2017,2020, we had $19.8$13.8 million of letters of credit and $52.1$42.7 million of surety bonds outstanding.

31
29

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Contractual Obligations
Our contractual obligations at September 30, 20172020 are presented below.
20212022-20232024-2025After 2025Total    
 (in millions)
Debt principal payments$1.2 $1.4 $0.1 $450.0 $452.7 
Debt interest payments24.8 49.6 49.5 24.8 148.7 
Operating leases5.5 9.1 7.8 12.5 34.9 
Unconditional purchase obligations(1)
112.4 0.9 — — 113.3 
Other current liabilities(2)
— — — — — 
$143.9 $61.0 $57.4 $487.3 $749.6 
 2018 2019-2020 2021-2022 After 2022 Total    
 (in millions)
Debt:         
Principal payments(1)
$5.6
 $10.7
 $471.7
 $
 $488.0
Interest(2)
20.3
 39.9
 22.6
 
 82.8
Operating leases3.6
 4.8
 4.1
 4.5
 17.0
Unconditional purchase obligations(3)
73.0
 2.5
 
 
 75.5
Other current liabilities(4)
1.2
 
 
 
 1.2
 $103.7
 $57.9
 $498.4
 $4.5
 $664.5
(1)Includes contractual obligations for purchases of raw materials and capital expenditures.
(2)Consists of obligations for required pension contributions. Actual payments may differ. We have not estimated required pension contributions beyond 2021.
(1)
The long-term debt balance at September 30, 2017 is net of $1.5 million of unamortized discount on the term loan.
(2)
Includes payment of interest associated with interest rate swap contracts.
(3)
Includes contractual obligations for purchases of raw materials and capital expenditures.
(4)
Consists of obligations for required pension contributions. Actual payments may differ. We have not estimated required pension contributions beyond 2018.
Effect of Inflation
We experience changing price levels primarily related to purchased components and raw materials. Infrastructure experienced a 12% increase13% decrease in the average cost per ton of scrap steel and a 12% increase9% decrease in the average cost of brass ingot purchased in 20172020 compared to 2016.  The2019.  Technologies businesses are not significantly impactedwas also favorably affected by fluctuationsthe 9% decrease in commodity prices.the average cost of brass ingot. We anticipate inflation in raw material costs in 2021.
Seasonality
Our water infrastructure business depends on construction activity, which is seasonal in many areas due to the impact of cold weather conditions on construction. Net sales and operating income have historically been lowest in the quarters ending December 31 and March 31 when the northern United States and all of Canada generally face weather conditions that restrict significant construction and other field crew activity. ForGenerally speaking, for Infrastructure, approximately 45% of a fiscal year’s net sales occurs in the first half of the fiscal year with 55% occurring in the second half of the fiscal year.year, though this pattern was disrupted by the pandemic in 2020. See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-Seasonal demand for certain of our products and services may adversely affect our financial results.”
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. These estimates are based upon experience and on various other assumptions we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. We consider an accounting estimate to be critical if changes in the estimate that are reasonably likely to occur over time or the use of reasonably different estimates could have a material impact on our financial condition or results of operations. We consider the accounting topics presented below to include our critical accounting estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We recognize revenue when deliverycontrol of promised products or services is transferred to our customers, in amounts that reflect the consideration to which we expect to be entitled in exchange for those products or services. We account for a product or performancecontract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of a servicethe parties are identified, the payment terms are identified, the contract has occurred and there is persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, sales prices are fixed and determinablecommercial substance and collectability fromof consideration is probable. We determine the appropriate revenue recognition for our contracts with customers is reasonably assured. Sales are recorded net of estimated discounts, returns and rebates. Discounts, returns and rebates are estimated based upon current offered salesby analyzing the type, terms and historical return and allowance rates.

32

Tableconditions of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidanceeach contract or arrangement with a customer. See Note 3. for the recognition of revenue and requiring additional financial statement disclosures.  We plan to adopt this guidance using the modified retrospective transition method beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We have completedmore information regarding our initial scoping and are developing a project plan to classify our revenue streams, to evaluate revenue recognition practices for each stream against the new requirements, to consider changes to the terms of our sales contracts, and to design and implement processes to quantify the effects of necessary changes. This work is ongoing, but at this time, we do not expect the new guidance to materially impact our stockholder's equity, net sales or operating income.
Receivables
We present trade receivables net of an allowance for credit losses. Our consolidated statements of operations reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized trade receivables, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period.
Our periodic evaluations of expected credit losses are based upon our judgments regarding prior collection experience, specific customer creditworthiness, other current conditions and forecasts of current economic trends within the industries served that may affect the collectibility of the reported amounts. Significantly weaker than anticipated industry or economic conditions could impact customers’ ability to pay such that actual credit losses may be greater than the amounts provided for in this allowance.
When we determine a specific trade receivable will not be collected, we charge off the uncollectible amount against the allowance.revenues.
Inventories
We record inventories at the lower of first-in, first-out method cost or estimated net realizable value. Inventory cost includes an overhead component that can be affected by levels of production and actual costs incurred. We evaluate the need to record adjustments for impairment of inventory at least quarterly. This evaluation includes such factors as anticipated usage, inventory levels and ultimate product sales value. If in our judgment persuasive evidence exists that the net realizable value of inventory is lower than its cost, the inventory value is written-down to its estimated net realizable value. Significant judgments regarding future events and market conditions must be made when estimating net realizable value.
30

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Income Taxes
We recognize deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statements and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, using enacted tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided to offset any net deferred tax assets when, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Our tax balances are based on our expectations of future operating performance, reversal of taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies, interpretation of the tax regulations currently enacted and rulings in numerous tax jurisdictions.
We only record tax benefits for positions that we believe are more likely than not of being sustained under audit examination based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. The amount of tax benefit recognized for any position that meets the more likely than not threshold is the largest amount of the tax benefit that we believe is greater than 50% likely of being realized.
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets Including Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
We test indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill for impairment annually (or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment). We performed this annual impairment testing at September 1, 2020, using standard valuation methodologies and rates that we considered reasonable, and concluded that our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill were not impaired.
We tested the indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment using a “royalty savings method,” which is a variation of the discounted cash flow method. This method estimates a fair value by calculating an estimated discounted future cash flow stream from the hypothetical licensing of the indefinite-lived intangible assets. If this estimated fair value exceeds the carrying value, no impairment is indicated. This analysis is dependent on management’s best estimates of future operating results and the selection of reasonable discount rates and hypothetical royalty rates. Significantly different projected operating results could result in a different conclusionconclusions regarding impairment. Standard
At March 31, 2020, in connection with pandemic-related disruptions on the overall market and our business, we reviewed our indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill to determine if possible impairments had been indicated. As a result of this review, we performed a quantitative goodwill impairment assessment of our Krausz reporting unit. The Krausz reporting unit had $85.9 million of goodwill at March 31, 2020. We used a discounted cash flow model to determine the estimated fair value of the reporting unit. We made estimates and assumptions regarding projected operating results, including future revenue, EBITDA margin and long-term growth rates, as well as the discount rate, to estimate the Krausz reporting unit’s fair value. These assumptions represented our best estimates and we believe they were reasonable and appropriate. However, they were forecasts during a complex and still-developing situation with the pandemic, and as such they involved a high degree of uncertainty. The key assumptions used in the March 31 valuation methodologies using rates considered reasonable by management haveincluded:
Our best estimates of revenue and expenses over a 5-year period, which support estimated EBITDA margins.
Long-term growth of revenue in the model beyond 2025 was 3 percent.
Long-term growth of free cash flow in the model beyond 2025 was 5 percent.
The discount rate in the model, which includes a forecast-risk factor, was 12.8 percent.
The results of the quantitative impairment assessment indicated that the Krausz reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value, which indicated that goodwill was not indicated an impairment.

impaired. However, the excess of the estimated fair value over the carrying value was not significant, the use of different key assumptions could result in a materially different outcome, and we cannot provide assurance that our estimates will be realized.
33
31

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



We performed a substantially similar goodwill impairment test at September 1 on our Krausz reporting unit with revised forecasts reflective of greater insight into the possible effects the pandemic may have on our operations. The Krausz reporting unit goodwill increased to $87.7 million at September 1, 2020 due to U.S. dollar-Israeli shekel exchange rate fluctuation. We also utilized the “guideline public company” method, which involves comparing the reporting unit to similar companies whose stocks are freely traded on organized exchanges. We weighted the results of the discounted cash flow method and the guideline public company method to conclude on a fair value. The key assumptions used in the September 1 valuation included:
Our best estimates of revenue and expenses over a 5-year period, which support estimated EBITDA margins.
Long-term growth of revenue in the model beyond 2025 was 3 percent.
Long-term growth of free cash flow in the model beyond 2025 was 5 percent.
The discount rate in the model, which includes a forecast-risk factor, was 13.5 percent.
The results of the quantitative impairment assessment indicated that the Krausz reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value, which indicated that goodwill was not impaired.
The continuation of pandemic-related effects on our business and the overall market could potentially materially change the key assumptions and lead to future impairment charges.
Other long-lived assets, including finite-lived intangible assets, are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives and reviewed for impairment if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment.
Warranty Costs
We accrue for warranty expenses that can include customer costs of repair and/or replacement, including labor, materials, equipment, freight and reasonable overhead costs. We accrue for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time of sale if such costs are determined to be reasonably estimable at that time. Warranty cost estimates are revised throughout applicable warranty periods as better information regarding warranty costs becomes available. Critical factors in our analyses include warranty terms, specific claim situations, general incurred and projected failure rates, the nature of product failures, product and labor costs, and general business conditions. These estimates are inherently uncertain as they are based on historical data. If warranty claims are made in the current period for issues that have not historically been the subject of warranty claims and were not taken into consideration in establishing the accrual or if claims for issues already considered in establishing the accrual exceed expectations, warranty expense may exceed the accrual for that particular product. Additionally, a significant increase in costs of repair or replacement could require additional warranty expense. We monitor and analyze our warranty experience and costs periodically and may revise our warranty accrual as necessary. However, as we cannot predict actual future claims, the potential exists for the difference in any one reporting period to be material.
32

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Contingencies
We are involved in litigation, investigations and claims arising out of the normal conduct of our business. We estimate and accrue liabilities resulting from such matters based on a variety of factors, including outstanding legal claims and proposed settlements; assessments by counsel of pending or threatened litigation; and assessments of potential environmental liabilities and remediation costs. We believe we have adequately accrued for these potential liabilities; however, facts and circumstances may change and could cause the actual liability to exceed the estimates, or may require adjustments to the recorded liability balances in the future. As we learn new facts concerning contingencies, we reassess our position both with respect to accrued liabilities and other potential exposures. Estimates particularly sensitive to future changes include liabilities recorded for environmental remediation, tax and legal matters. Estimated future environmental remediation costs are subject to change due to such factors as the uncertain magnitude of cleanup costs, the unknown time and extent of such remedial actions that may be required, and the determination of our liability in proportion to that of other responsible parties. Estimated future costs related to tax and legal matters are subject to change as events evolve and as additional information becomes available during the administrative and litigation processes. For more information on these and other contingencies, see Note 17.18. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. See also “Item 1. BUSINESS - Regulatory and Environmental Matters,” “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS” and “Item 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS”
Workers Compensation, Defined Benefit Pension Plans, Environmental and Other Long-term Liabilities
We are obligated for various liabilities that will ultimately be determined over what could be a very long future time period.periods. We established the recorded liabilities for such items at September 30, 20172020 using estimates for when such amounts will be paid and what the amounts of such payments will be. These estimates are subject to change based on numerous factors, including among others, regulatory changes, technology changes, the investment performance of related assets, longevity of participants, the discount rate used and changes to plan designs.
Business Combinations
We recognize assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated acquisition date fair values, with the excess of purchase price over the estimated fair values of identifiable net assets recorded as goodwill. Assigning fair values requires us to make significant estimates and assumptions regarding the fair value of identifiable intangible assets. We may refine these estimates if necessary over a period not to exceed one year by taking into consideration new information that, if known at the acquisition date, would have affected the fair values recognized for assets acquired and liabilities assumed.
Significant estimates and assumptions are used in estimating the value of acquired identifiable intangible assets, including estimating future cash flows based on forecasted revenues and EBITDA margins that we expect to generate following the acquisition, selecting an applicable royalty rate where needed, applying an appropriate discount rate to estimate a present value of those cash flows and determining their useful lives. These assumptions are forward-looking and could be affected by future economic and market conditions.
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
Item 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK
We are exposed to various market risks, including potential losses arising from adverse changes in market prices and rates, such as various commodity prices interest rates and foreign exchange rates. We do not enter into derivatives or other financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
Our primary financial instruments are cash and cash equivalents. This includes cash in banks and highly rated, liquid money market investments. We believe those instruments are not subject to material potential near-term losses in future earnings from reasonably possible near-term changes in market rates or prices.
Commodity Price Risk
Our products are made using various purchased components and several basic raw materials, including brass ingot, scrap steel, sand and resin. We expect prices for these items to fluctuate based on marketplace demand and our product margins and level of profitability may fluctuate ifwhether or not we do not pass changes in purchased component and raw material costs on to our customers.
Infrastructure experienced a 12% increase13% decrease in the average cost per ton of scrap steel and a 12% increase9% decrease in the average cost of brass ingot purchased in 20172020 compared to 2016.2019. Technologies was also favorably affected by the 9% decrease in the average cost of brass ingot. See “Item 1A. RISK FACTORS-The prices of our purchased components and raw materials can be volatile.”
Interest Rate Risk
At September 30, 2017, we have variable rate debt with a face value of $486.3 million. To the extent LIBOR is above our Term Loan’s rate floor of 0.75%, the impact on pre-tax earnings or cash flows resulting from a 100 basis point increase in interest rates on variable rate debt, holding other variables constant, would be approximately $5 million per year. Our interest rate swap contracts described in Note 8. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements reduce this annual hypothetical exposure by approximately $1.5 million annually during 2018-2021.

3433

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Currency Risk
Our principal assets, liabilities and operations outside the U.S. are in Israel, Canada and China. These assets and liabilities are translated into U.S. dollars at currency exchange rates in effect at the end of each period, with the effect of such translation reflected in other comprehensive loss. Our stockholders’ equity will fluctuate depending upon the weakening or strengthening of the U.S. dollar against these non-U.S. currencies. Net sales and expenses of these subsidiaries are translated into U.S. dollars at the average currency exchange rate during the period. At September 30, 2017, $74.72020, $222.5 million of our net assets were denominated in non-U.S. currencies.
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
Item 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements that are filed as part of this annual report are listed under “Item 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES” and are set forth beginning on page F-1 .F-1.
Selected quarterly financial data for 20172020 and 20162019 are provided in Note 19.20. of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
34

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Item 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports we file or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
Our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this annual report. Based on this evaluation, those officers have concluded that, at September 30, 2017,2020, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended September 30, 20172020 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act). Internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
We assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at September 30, 2017.2020. In making this assessment, we used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013 framework). After doing so, management concluded that, at September 30, 2017,2020, our internal control over financial reporting was effective.
The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting at September 30, 20172020 has been audited by Ernst & Young LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which is included in this annual report.

35

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



PART III
Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Item 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The name, age at November 15, 201718, 2020 and position of each of our current executive officers and directors at September 30, 2020 are presented below.
NameAgePosition
Gregory E. Hyland66
Executive Chairman of the board of directors
Scott Hall5356 
President and Chief Executive Officer
Keith L. BelknapSteven S. Heinrichs5952 
Executive Vice President, Business Development, General Counsel, Chief Legal and Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary
Evan L. HartMarietta Edmunds Zakas5261 
SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
Kevin G. McHughWilliam A. Cofield5961 
Senior Vice President, and ControllerOperations & Supply Chain
Gregory S. RogowskiTodd P. Helms5853 
ExecutiveSenior Vice President, Chief Human Resource Officer
Chad D. Mize44 Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing
Marietta Edmunds ZakasRichelle R. Feyerherm5849 
Executive Vice President, Strategy, Corporate Development and Communications
Hassan Ali47
Senior Vice President, Engineering and Information Technology Officer
John Van Gerwen59
Senior Vice President, Operations Controller
Michael S. Nancarrow46 Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer
Shirley C. Franklin7275 
Director
Thomas J. Hansen6871 
Director
Jerry W. Kolb8184 
Director
Mark J. O’Brien7477 
Director
Christine Ortiz50 Director
Bernard G. Rethore7679 
Director
Lydia W. Thomas7376 
Director
Michael T. Tokarz6871 
Director
Stephen C. Van Arsdell70 Director
Gregory E. Hyland has been Executive Chairman of the board of directors since January 2017. Previously, Mr. Hyland was Chairman of the board of directors from October 2005 to January 2017, and President and Chief Executive Officer from January 2006 to January 2017. Mr. Hyland was Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Walter Energy, a homebuilding, financial services and natural resources company, from September 2005 to December 2006. Prior to that time, he was President, U.S. Fleet Management Solutions of Ryder System, Inc. (“Ryder”), a transportation and logistics company, from June 2005 to September 2005. Mr. Hyland was Executive Vice President, U.S. Fleet Management Solutions of Ryder from October 2004 to June 2005. He earned Bachelor and Master of Business Administration degrees from the University of Pittsburgh.
Scott Hall has beenserved as our President and Chief Executive Officer since January 2017. He served as President and CEO of Textron’s Industrial segment from December 2009 until January 2017. Mr. Hall joined Textron in 2001 as president of Tempo, a multi-facility roll-up of communication test equipment. He was named president of Greenlee, a manufacturer of tools used in installing wire and cable, in 2003 when Tempo became part of Textron'sTextron’s Greenlee business unit. Prior to joining Textron, Mr. Hall had several leadership roles at General Cable, a leading manufacturer of wire and cable. Mr. Hall ran General Cable’s Canadian businesses before taking over responsibility for General Cable’s global Communications business. Mr. Hall receivedearned his Bachelor of Commerce degree from Memorial University of Newfoundland and his MBA from the University of Western Ontario Ivey School of Business.
Keith L. Belknap Steven S. Heinrichs has beenserved as our Executive Vice President, Business Development since October 2017Chief Legal and was President of Mueller Technologies from July 2015 to October 2017. Mr. Belknap has been our General CounselCompliance Officer and Corporate Secretary since April 2012 and our Chief Compliance Officer since October 2012. Previously, Mr. Belknap wasAugust 2018. He served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of PRIMEDIA,Neenah, Inc. (f/k/a Neenah Paper, Inc.), which spun off from Kimberly-Clark Corporation in December 2004, from June 2004 to July 2018. Mr. Heinrichs joined Kimberly-Clark as Chief Counsel, Pulp and Paper and General Counsel for Neenah, Inc. Prior to his employment with Kimberly-Clark, Mr. Heinrichs served as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary for Mariner Health Care, Inc., a digital medianursing home and real estate advertisinglong-term acute care hospital company. Before joining Mariner Health Care in 2003, Mr. Heinrichs served as Associate General Counsel and Assistant Secretary for American Commercial Lines LLC, a leading inland barge and shipbuilding company since 2007. Prior to that time, he held senior legal positionsfrom 1998 through 2003. Mr. Heinrichs engaged in the private practice of law with PPG Industries, a supplierSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher and Flom LLP and Shuttleworth, Smith, McNabb and Williams PLLC from 1994 through 1998. Mr. Heinrichs earned his MBA from the Kellogg School of paint, coating, optical product, specialty material, chemical, glassManagement at Northwestern University in 2008, his law degree from Tulane University in 1994, and fiberglass, and Georgia-Pacific Corporation, a manufacturer and marketer of tissue, packaging, paper, pulp and building products. Mr. Belknap earned ahis Bachelor of Arts degree with honors from the University of Tulsa (Phi Beta Kappa) and a Juris Doctor with honors from Harvard Law School.Virginia.

36

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Evan L. Hart Marietta Edmunds Zakas has beenserved as our SeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since July 2008. Mr. Hart was our Controller from December 2007 to July 2008 and our Vice President of Financial Planning and Analysis from September 2006 to December 2007. Previously, he was Vice President, Controller and Treasurer for Unisource Worldwide, Inc., a marketer and distributor of commercial printing and business imaging papers, packaging systems and facility supplies and equipment from 2002 to 2006. Mr. Hart earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Birmingham-Southern College and is a certified public accountant.
Kevin G. McHugh has been our Vice President and Controller since July 2008. Mr. McHugh was our Vice President, Financial Reporting from January 2008 to July 2008. Previously, he was Corporate Controller at Unisource Worldwide, Inc. from 2003 to 2007. Mr. McHugh earned a Bachelor of Business Administration degree with honors from the University of Notre Dame and is a certified public accountant.
Gregory S. Rogowski has been our Executive Vice President, Sales and Marketing since October 2017, and was President of Infrastructure from May 2009 to October 2017. Previously, Mr. Rogowski was President and/or Chief Executive Officer of Performance Fibers, Inc., a polyester industrial fibers business from 2004 to 2009. He earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, a Master of Science degree from the University of Akron and a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Richmond.
Marietta Edmunds Zakas has been our Executive2018. She served as Senior Vice President, Strategy, Corporate Development and Communications sincefrom November 2006.2006 to December 2017. She haswas also been the interim head of Human Resources sincefrom January 2016.2016 to December 2017. Previously, Ms. Zakas held various positions at Russell Corporation, an athletic apparel, footwear and equipment company, culminating in her role as Corporate Vice President, Chief of Staff, Business Development and Treasurer. She earned a Bachelor of Arts degree with honors from Randolph-Macon Woman’s College (now known as Randolph College), a Master of Business Administration degree from the University of Virginia Darden School of Business and a Juris Doctor from the University of Virginia School of Law. Ms. Zakas is a director of Atlantic Capital Bank and Atlantic Capital Bancshares.
Hassan Ali
36

Index to Financial Statements

William A. Cofield has beenserved as our Senior Vice President, EngineeringOperations & Supply Chain since January 2018. Previously, Mr. Cofield served as Vice President of Operations and Information TechnologySupply Chain for MGA Entertainment from May 2014 to December 2018 and Vice President of Operations for the Rubbermaid business within Newell Brands, Inc. (formerly Newell Rubbermaid, Inc.) from January 2009 to May 2014. Mr. Cofield earned his Bachelor of Science degree from the United States Military Academy. Upon graduation, he was commissioned as an officer in the United States Army where he served for 10 years. Mr. Cofield achieved the rank of Major before resigning his commission.
Todd P. Helms has served as our Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer since February 2020. Previously, Mr. Helms held the position of Executive Vice President and Chief Human Resource Officer at Synovus Financial Corporation and of Senior Vice President, Human Resources at Genuine Parts Company. Mr. Helms earned a Bachelor of Science degree from King College, a Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering from Georgia Institute of Technology and a Master of Business Administration from Ohio University.
Chad D. Mize has served as our Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing since October 2017 and was2019. He served as Vice President and General Manager of the Brass, Gas and Repair Value Stream from October 2017 to September 2019; Chief Financial Officer and Vice President of Mueller Systems,Co. LLC from November 2009March 2010 to September 2017; Corporate Controller from January 2007 to February 2010; and Manager of Financial Reporting and Analysis from October 2017.2004 to December 2006. Previously, Mr. AliMize served as General Manager,Senior Audit Supervisor of Archer Daniels Midland from May 1998 to September 2004. Mr. Mize earned a Bachelor of Science degree from Illinois State University and a Master of Business Administration from Millikin University.
Richelle R. Feyerherm has served as our Vice President, and DirectorOperations Controller since November 2019. Previously, Ms. Feyerherm served as a Financial Officer of Marketing for Landis+Gyr and Directorthe Water Products division of Quality and Business Excellence at Siemens Power Transmission & Distribution. Mr Ali received hisLonza Group, Ltd. from October 2011 to February 2019. Ms. Feyerherm earned her Bachelor of Science degree from the State University of New York at Buffalo.and is a certified public accountant.
John H. Van Gerwen, Michael S. Nancarrow has beenserved as our Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer since January 2018. He served as our Senior Vice President, OperationsDirector, Financial Reporting and Assistant Controller since October 2017,December 2014 and was Vice Presidentour Director of Operations of our Infrastructure segment from May 2010 to October 2017. Previously,Financial Reporting since September 2006. Mr. Van Gerwen was Vice President of Acquisition Integration at Camber Corporation, a leading provider of engineering and advanced training solutions to federal government agencies, primarily within the Department of Defense, from 2008 to 2009. Mr. Van GerwenNancarrow earned a Bachelor of Science degree in Mechanical Engineering from theThe Ohio State University of Waterloo in Ontario, Canada.and is a certified public accountant.
Shirley C. Franklin has been a member of our board of directors since November 2010. Ms. Franklin is the Barbara Jordan visiting professor at the LBJ School of the University of Texas and theserves as Executive Chair of the board of directors of Purpose Built Communities, Inc., a national non-profit organization established to transform struggling neighborhoods into sustainable communities. She also isserves as Co-Chair of the Atlanta Regional Commission on Homelessness and as Chair of the board of directors of the National Center for Civil and Human Rights.  From 2002 to 2010, Ms. Franklin was mayor of Atlanta, Georgia. She is a director of Delta Air Lines, Inc., a provider of air transportation for passengers and cargo. Ms. Franklin earned a Bachelor of Science degree in sociology from Howard University and a Master’s degree in sociology from the University of Pennsylvania.
Thomas J. Hansen has been a member of our board of directors since October 2011.  Until 2012, Mr. Hansen wasserved as Vice Chairman of Illinois Tool Works Inc. (“ITW”), a manufacturer of fasteners and components, consumable systems and a variety of specialty products and equipment. He joined ITW in 1980 as sales and marketing manager of the Shakeproof Industrial Products businesses.  From 1998 until May 2006, Mr. Hansen wasserved as Executive Vice President of ITW.  He is a director of Terex Corporation, a diversified global manufacturer of a variety of machinery products, and Standex International Corporation, a manufacturer of products and services for diverse industrial market segments.  Mr. Hansen earned a Bachelor of Science degree in marketing from Northern Illinois University and a Master of Business Administration degree from Governors State University.

37

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Jerry W. Kolb has been a member of our board of directors since April 2006. From 1986 to 1998, Mr. Kolb was a director of Walter Energy from 2003 until 2016. He wasserved as a Vice Chairman of Deloitte & Touche LLP, a registered public accounting firm, from 1986 to 1998.firm. Mr. Kolb earned a Bachelor of Science degree in accountancy with highest honors from the University of Illinois and Master of Business Administration degree in finance from DePaul University. Mr. Kolb is a certified public accountant.
37

Index to Financial Statements

Mark J. O’Brien has been a member of our board of directors since April 2006.2006 and has served as our Non-Executive Chairman since January 2018. He servesserved as Chairman of Walter Investment Management Corp. (formerly Walter Energy’s financing business)Industries’ Homes Business), a mortgage portfolio owner and mortgage originator and servicer, from 2009 through December 2015, and he served as its Chief Executive Officer from 2009 to October 2015 he served as Chief Executive Officer of the company.2015. Mr. O’Brien has been President and Chief Executive Officer of Brier Patch Capital and Management, Inc., a real estate management and investment firm, since September 2004. He heldserved in various executive positionscapacities at Pulte Homes, Inc., a home building company, for 21 years, retiring as President and Chief Executive Officer in June 2003.Mr. O’Brien earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in history from the University of Miami.
Christine Ortiz has been a member of our board of directors since November 2018. Dr. Ortiz is the Morris Cohen Professor of Materials Science and Engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The author of more than 180 scholarly publications, she has supervised research projects across multiple academic disciplines, received 30 national and international honors, including the Presidential Early Career Award in Science and Engineering awarded to her by President George W. Bush, and served as the Dean for Graduate Education at MIT from 2010 to 2016. She is also the founder of an innovative, nonprofit, post-secondary educational institution, Station1. Dr. Ortiz earned a B.S. from Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and an M.S. and Ph.D. from Cornell University, all in the field of materials science and engineering.
Bernard G. Rethore has been a member of our board of directors since April 2006. He was a director of Walter Energy from 2002 until 2016. Mr. Rethore has beenserved as Chairman of the Board Emeritusof Flowserve Corporation, a manufacturer of pumps, valves, seals and components, since April 2000. From January 2000 to April 2000, he wasserved as Flowserve’s Chairman. Mr. Rethore had previously served as its Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer. He had been a director of Belden, Inc., a manufacturer of specialty signal-transmission products, from 1997 until May 2012 and of Dover Corp., a diversified manufacturer of a wide range of proprietary products, from 2001 until May 2017. In 2008, heMr. Rethore was honored by the Outstanding Directors Exchange as an Outstanding Director of the Year, and in 2012, he was designated a Board Leadership Fellow by the National Association of Corporate Directors. Mr. Rethore earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in Economics (Honors) from Yale University and a Master of Business Administration degree from the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, where he was a Joseph P. Wharton Scholar and Fellow.
Lydia W. Thomas has been a member of our board of directors since January 2008. Dr. Thomas wasserved as President and Chief Executive Officer of Noblis, Inc., a public interest scientific research, technology and developmentstrategy company, from 1996 to 2007. She was previously with The MITRE Corporation, Center for Environment, Resources and Space, serving as Senior Vice President and General Manager from 1992 to 1996, Vice President from 1989 to 1992 and Technical Director from 1982 to 1989. Dr. Thomas is a director of Cabot Corporation, a global performance materials company. In 2013, she was honored by the Outstanding Directors Exchange as an Outstanding Director of the Year. Dr. Thomas is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations. She earned a Bachelor of Science degree in zoology from Howard University, a Master of Science degree in microbiology from American University and a Doctor of Philosophy degree in cytology from Howard University.
Michael T. Tokarz has been a member of our board of directors since April 2006. From 1985 until 2002, Mr. Tokarz served as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Walter Energy from 2006 until 2016. Since February 2002, he has been a member of the Tokarz Group, LLC, an investment company. From January 1996 until February 2002, Mr. Tokarz was a member of the limited liability company that serves as the general partner of Kohlberg Kravis Roberts & Co. L.P., a private equity company. He isserved as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Walter Energy, Inc. until July 2016, and until May 2017, he served as a director of CNO Financial Group, Inc. (formerly Conseco, Inc.), an insurance provider, and as a director of Walter Investment Management Corp. Mr. Tokarz has served as a director of the Tokarz Group, LLC, an investment company, since 2002 and of MVC Capital, Inc., a registered investment company, and Walter Investment Management Corp. Until February 2015, he served as a director of IDEX Corporation and until January 2014 he served as a director of Dakota Growers Pasta Company.since 2003. In 2007, he was honored by the Outstanding Directors Exchange as an Outstanding Director of the Year. Mr. Tokarz earned a Bachelor of Arts degree in economics with high distinction and a Master of Business Administration degree in finance from the University of Illinois.
Stephen C. Van Arsdell has been a member of our board of directors since July 2019. Mr. Van Arsdell is a former senior partner of Deloitte LLP, where he served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Deloitte & Touche LLP from 2010-2012 and as Deputy Chief Executive Officer from 2009-2010. He also served as a member of Deloitte’s board of directors from 2003-2009, during which time he held the position of Vice-Chairman. Mr. Van Arsdell has served as a member of the board of directors of First Midwest Bancorp, Inc. since 2015 and has been a member of the audit committee of Brown Brothers Harriman since 2017. Mr. Van Arsdell earned both a Bachelor of Science degree in Accounting and a Masters of Accounting Science degree from the University of Illinois. He is a certified public accountant.
38

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Additional Information
Additional information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement issued in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders filed with the SEC within 120 days after September 30, 20172020 and is incorporated herein by reference.
Our website address is www.muellerwaterproducts.com. You may read and print our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements and all amendments to those reports from the investor relations section of our website free of charge. These reports are available on our website soon after we file them with or furnish them to the SEC. These reports should also be available through the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.
We have adopted a written code of conduct that applies to all directors, officers and employees, including a separate code that applies only to our principal executive officer and senior financial officers in accordance with Section 406 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the rules of the SEC promulgated thereunder. Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics is available in the corporate governance section of our website. In the event that we make changes in, or provide waivers from, the provisions of this Code of Business Conduct and Ethics that the SEC requires us to disclose, we will disclose these events in the corporate governance section of our website.

38

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We have adopted corporate governance guidelines. The guidelines and the charters of our board committees are available in the corporate governance section of our website. Copies of the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, corporate governance guidelines and board committee charters are also available in print upon written request to the Corporate Secretary, Mueller Water Products, Inc., 1200 Abernathy Road N.E., Suite 1200, Atlanta, GA 30328.
Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Item 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement issued in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Item 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Except for the information set forth below and the information set forth in “Part II, Item 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES,” the information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement issued in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans
We have two compensation plans under which our equity securities are authorized for issuance. The Mueller Water Products, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) was approved by our sole stockholder in May 2006 and amended by our stockholders in February 2016. The Mueller Water Products, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) was approved by our sole stockholder in May 2006 and amended by our stockholders in January 2008, January 2009 and January 2012.
39

Index to Financial Statements

The following table sets forth certain information relating to these equity compensation plans at September 30, 2017.2020.
Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:
2006 Plan1,807,482 (1)$6.11 (2)6,575,797 (3)
ESPP37,607   — 2,400,158 (4)
Total1,845,089   8,975,955   

(1)Consists of the maximum number of shares that could be earned upon exercise or vesting of outstanding stock-based awards granted under the 2006 Plan. This includes 1,070,877 shares associated with share-settled performance units that may not be earned, depending on Company performance or stock market performance, as described in Note 12. of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Weighted average exercise price of options to acquire 328,099 shares of our common stock.
(3)The number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan is 20,500,000 shares less the cumulative number of shares granted under the plan, assuming maximum payout of all share-settled performance units for which performance goals have not yet been set, plus the cumulative number of awards canceled under the plan and, after January 25, 2012, shares surrendered upon issuance to cover employees’ related tax liability.
(4)The number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the ESPP Plan is 5,800,000 shares less the cumulative number of shares that have been issued under the plan.
 
Number of securities
to be issued
upon exercise of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Weighted average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights
 
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders:        
2006 Plan3,853,687
(1) 
 $5.72
(2) 
 7,204,369
(3) 
ESPP35,894
   
  2,901,604
(4) 
Total3,889,581
      10,105,973
  
(1)Consists of the maximum number of shares that could to be earned upon exercise or vesting of outstanding stock-based awards granted under the 2006 Plan. This includes 426,432 shares associated with share-settled performance units that may not be earned, depending on Company performance, as described in Note 11. of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(2)Weighted average exercise price of 2,440,654 outstanding stock options.
(3)
The number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the 2006 Plan is 20,500,000 shares less the cumulative number of shares granted under the plan, assuming maximum payout of all share-settled performance units for which performance goals have not yet been set, plus the cumulative number of awards canceled under the plan and, after January 25, 2012, shares surrendered upon issuance to cover employees' related tax liability.
(4)The number of securities remaining available for future issuance under the ESPP Plan is 5,800,000 shares less the cumulative number of shares that have been issued under the plan.
Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Item 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement issued in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

39

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Item 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this item will be contained in our definitive proxy statement issued in connection with the 20182021 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated herein by reference.

40

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



PART IV
Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)Financial Statements
Item 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)Financial Statements
Index to financial statements
Page

number
Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmF-1
Consolidated Balance Sheets at September 30, 20172020 and 20162019F-3F-4
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018F-4F-5
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018F-5F-6
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018F-6F-7
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 20152018F-7F-8
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the three years ended September 30, 20172020F-8F-9

(b)Financial Statement Schedules
(b)Financial Statement Schedules
Except for Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, the schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the SEC are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and, therefore, have been omitted. The information required by Schedule II is included in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
(c)Exhibits
(c)Exhibits
Exhibit no.Document
2.1
2.2
2.3
2.42.5
2.5
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2 **


10.2
10.3*

41



10.3.1*
Exhibit no.Document
10.3.1*
10.4*10.4.2*
10.4.1*
10.4.2*
10.5*10.6.1*
10.5.1*
10.5.2*
10.6*
10.6.1*
10.7*
41

Index to Financial Statements

10.8*Exhibit no.Document
10.8*
10.9*
10.10*
10.11*10.11.2*
10.11.1*
10.11.2*
10.11.3*
10.11.4*
10.11.5*
10.12*
10.12.1*
10.12.2*

42



10.14
Exhibit no.Document
10.12.3*
10.13*
10.14
10.15*10.16*
10.16*
10.17*10.17.1*
10.17.1*
10.19
10.19.1
10.19.2
10.19.3
10.19.410.21
10.20*
10.20.1*
10.20.2*
10.20.3*
10.21
10.22*
10.22.1*
10.23*

43



10.29*
Exhibit no.Document
10.23.1*
10.23.2*
10.23.3*
10.24*
10.25*
10.26*
10.27*
10.27.1
10.28*
10.28.1*
10.29*
10.29.1*10.29.2*
10.30*10.29.4*
10.30*
10.30.1*10.30.3*
10.31*
12.1**10.31.2*
14.1*
21.1**
23.1**
31.1**
31.2**
32.1**
42

Index to Financial Statements

Exhibit no.Document
32.2**
101**
The following financial information from the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30, 2015,2020, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language), (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Other Comprehensive Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
104**Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)
*Management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement
**
*    Management compensatory plan, contract or arrangement
**    Filed with this annual report

44
43


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: November 21, 2017
18, 2020
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC.
By:/s/ Scott Hall
Name: Scott Hall
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SignatureTitleDate
SignatureTitleDate
/s/ Gregory E. HylandExecutive Chairman of the Board of DirectorsNovember 21, 2017
Gregory E. Hyland
/s/ Scott HallPresident and Chief Executive OfficerNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Scott Hall
/s/ Evan L. HartMarietta Edmunds ZakasSeniorExecutive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer)November 21, 201718, 2020
Evan L. HartMarietta Edmunds Zakas
/s/ Kevin G. McHughMichael S. NancarrowVice President and ControllerChief Accounting Officer (principal accounting officer)November 21, 201718, 2020
Kevin G. McHughMichael S. Nancarrow
/s/ Shirley C. FranklinDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Shirley C. Franklin
/s/ Thomas J. HansenDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Thomas J. Hansen
/s/ Jerry W. KolbDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Jerry W. Kolb
/s/ Mark J. O’BrienDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Mark J. O’Brien
/s/ Christine OrtizDirectorNovember 18, 2020
Christine Ortiz
/s/ Bernard G. RethoreDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Bernard G. Rethore
/s/ Lydia W. ThomasDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Lydia W. Thomas
/s/ Michael T. TokarzDirectorNovember 21, 201718, 2020
Michael T. Tokarz
/s/ Stephen C. Van ArsdellDirectorNovember 18, 2020
Stephen C. Van Arsdell


45
44


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TheTo the Stockholders and the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Mueller Water Products, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries(the Company) as of September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, the related consolidated statements of operations,comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2020, and the related notes(collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at September 30, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2020, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)and our report dated November 18, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
F- 1

Index to Financial Statements

Critical Audit Matter
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective or complex judgments. The communication of the critical audit matter does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the account or disclosure to which it relates.
Valuation of Goodwill - Krausz Reporting Unit
Description of the Matter
As described in Note 6 to the consolidated financial statements, goodwill is tested at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. As of September 1, 2020, the Company performed a quantitative assessment of the $87.7 million in goodwill of the Krausz Industries (“Krausz”) reporting unit. The Company determined the fair value of the Krausz reporting unit using valuation techniques including the discounted cash flow method, a form of the income approach, and the guideline public company method, a form of the market approach.
Auditing management’s impairment test over the Krausz reporting unit goodwill using the discounted cash flow method involved especially subjective judgments due to the significant estimation uncertainty in determining the fair value of the reporting unit. In particular, the fair value estimate was sensitive to significant assumptions such as forecasted revenues, EBITDA margins and the discount rate. These significant assumptions are forward-looking and could be affected by future industry, market and economic conditions.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit
We tested the Company’s controls over review of the fair value of the Krausz reporting unit. This included testing controls over management’s review of the valuation model and the significant assumptions described above.

To test the estimated fair value of the Krausz reporting unit, we performed audit procedures that included, among others, assessing the methodologies used to estimate fair value, testing the significant assumptions used to develop the fair value estimate, and testing the underlying data used by the Company in its analysis for completeness and accuracy. For example, we evaluated the reasonableness of management’s forecasted revenues and EBITDA margins used in the fair value estimates by comparing those assumptions to the historical results of Krausz and current industry, market and economic forecasts. We also involved our valuation specialists to evaluate the valuation methodologies and the reasonableness of the discount rate. As part of this evaluation, we compared the discount rate to market data. In addition, we performed a sensitivity analysis on the significant assumptions to evaluate the potential change in the fair value of the reporting unit that would result from the changes in assumptions.
mwa-20200930_g2.gif
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2007.
Atlanta, Georgia
November 18, 2020
F- 2

Index to Financial Statements

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and Board of Directors of Mueller Water Products, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the COSO criteria). In our opinion, Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2020, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of September 30, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries at September 30, 2017 and 2016,2020, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Mueller Water Products, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) related notesand our report dated November 21, 201718, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Atlanta, Georgia
November 21, 2017

F- 1



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting FirmBasis for Opinion
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of Mueller Water Products, Inc.
We have audited Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework)(the COSO criteria). Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries’Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of September 30, 2017, based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Mueller Water Products, Inc. and subsidiaries as of September 30, 2017 and 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended September 30, 2017 and our report dated November 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

mwa-20200930_g2.gif
Atlanta, Georgia
November 21, 201718, 2020


F- 23




MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

September 30, September 30,
2017 2016 20202019
(in millions, except share amounts) (in millions, except share amounts)
Assets:   Assets:
Cash and cash equivalents$361.7
 $195.0
Cash and cash equivalents$208.9 $176.7 
Receivables, net145.3
 131.8
Receivables, net180.8 172.8 
Inventories138.9
 130.7
Inventories162.5 191.4 
Other current assets24.4
 12.7
Other current assets29.0 26.0 
Current assets held for sale
 142.1
Total current assets670.3
 612.3
Total current assets581.2 566.9 
Property, plant and equipment, net122.3
 108.4
Property, plant and equipment, net253.8 217.1 
Intangible assets439.3
 434.6
Intangible assets408.9 433.7 
GoodwillGoodwill99.8 95.7 
Other noncurrent assets26.4
 25.4
Other noncurrent assets51.3 23.9 
Noncurrent assets held for sale
 99.9
Total assets$1,258.3
 $1,280.6
Total assets$1,395.0 $1,337.3 
   
Liabilities and equity:   Liabilities and equity:
Current portion of long-term debt$5.6
 $5.6
Current portion of long-term debt$1.1 $0.9 
Accounts payable82.5
 73.7
Accounts payable67.3 84.6 
Other current liabilities53.5
 61.7
Other current liabilities86.6 93.0 
Current liabilities held for sale
 44.8
Total current liabilities141.6
 185.8
Total current liabilities155.0 178.5 
Long-term debt475.0
 478.8
Long-term debt446.5 445.4 
Deferred income taxes115.1
 109.9
Deferred income taxes96.5 87.9 
Other noncurrent liabilities37.1
 85.8
Other noncurrent liabilities56.3 33.2 
Noncurrent liabilities held for sale
 0.8
Total liabilities768.8
 861.1
Total liabilities754.3 745.0 
   
Commitments and contingencies (Note 17.)   
Commitments and contingencies (Note 18.)Commitments and contingencies (Note 18.)
   
Common stock: 600,000,000 shares authorized; 158,590,383 and 161,693,051 shares outstanding at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively1.6
 1.6
Common stock: 600,000,000 shares authorized; 158,064,750 and 157,462,140 shares outstanding at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectivelyCommon stock: 600,000,000 shares authorized; 158,064,750 and 157,462,140 shares outstanding at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively1.6 1.6 
Additional paid-in capital1,494.2
 1,563.9
Additional paid-in capital1,378.0 1,410.7 
Accumulated deficit(955.6) (1,078.9)Accumulated deficit(714.2)(786.2)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(51.8) (68.3)Accumulated other comprehensive loss(24.7)(36.0)
Total Company stockholders’ equity488.4
 418.3
Total Company stockholders’ equity640.7 590.1 
Noncontrolling interest1.1
 1.2
Noncontrolling interest2.2 
Total equity489.5

419.5
Total equity640.7 592.3 
Total liabilities and equity$1,258.3

$1,280.6
Total liabilities and equity$1,395.0 $1,337.3 





The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F- 3

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 Year ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales$826.0
 $800.6
 $793.4
Cost of sales558.5
 532.7
 547.1
Gross profit267.5
 267.9
 246.3
Operating expenses:     
Selling, general and administrative156.4
 151.2
 146.7
Pension settlement
 16.6
 0.5
Loss on Walter receivable
 
 11.6
Other charges10.4
 7.2
 7.9
Total operating expenses166.8
 175.0
 166.7
Operating income100.7
 92.9
 79.6
Interest expense, net22.2
 23.6
 27.5
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 
 31.3
Income before income taxes78.5
 69.3
 20.8
Income tax expense24.2
 24.2
 8.3
Income from continuing operations54.3
 45.1
 12.5
Income from discontinued operations69.0
 18.8
 18.4
Net income$123.3

$63.9

$30.9
      
Earnings per basic share:     
Continuing operations$0.34
 $0.28
 $0.08
Discontinued operations0.43
 0.12
 0.11
Net Income$0.77
 $0.40
 $0.19
      
Earnings per diluted share:     
Continuing operations$0.34
 $0.28
 $0.08
Discontinued operations0.42
 0.11
 0.11
Net income$0.76
 $0.39
 $0.19
      
Weighted average shares outstanding:     
Basic160.1
 161.3
 160.5
Diluted161.8
 163.4
 163.2
      
Dividends declared per share$0.150
 $0.100
 $0.075



The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F- 4

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

 Year ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Net income$123.3
 $63.9
 $30.9
Other comprehensive income (loss):     
Minimum pension liability17.4
 2.8
 6.3
Income tax effects(6.7) (1.1) (2.6)
Foreign currency translation2.8
 0.2
 (8.7)
Derivative instruments4.9
 (4.7) (2.6)
Income tax effects(1.9) 1.8
 1.0
 16.5
 (1.0) (6.6)
Comprehensive income$139.8
 $62.9
 $24.3
 Year ended September 30,
 202020192018
 (in millions, except per share amounts)
Net sales$964.1 $968.0 $916.0 
Cost of sales635.9 647.1 626.1 
Gross profit328.2 320.9 289.9 
Operating expenses:
Selling, general and administrative198.4 182.7 166.7 
Gain on sale of idle property(2.4)(9.0)
Other charges13.0 16.3 10.5 
Total operating expenses211.4 196.6 168.2 
Operating income116.8 124.3 121.7 
Pension costs (benefits) other than service(3.0)0.4 1.0 
Interest expense, net25.5 19.8 20.9 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt6.5 
Gain on settlement of interest rate swap contracts(2.4)
Walter Energy accrual0.2 22.0 
Income before income taxes94.1 82.1 95.7 
Income tax expense (benefit)22.1 18.3 (9.9)
Net income$72.0 $63.8 $105.6 
Net income per share:
Basic$0.46 $0.40 $0.67 
Diluted$0.45 $0.40 $0.66 
Weighted average shares outstanding:
Basic157.8 157.8 158.2 
Diluted158.6 159.0 159.7 
Dividends declared per share$0.2100 $0.2025 $0.1900 



The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F- 5

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
 Year ended September 30,
 202020192018
 (in millions)
Net income$72.0 $63.8 $105.6 
Other comprehensive income (loss):
Pension liability4.4 (13.3)27.4 
Income tax effects(1.1)3.8 (6.9)
Foreign currency translation8.0 6.3 (3.0)
Derivative instruments2.4 
Income tax effects(0.9)
11.3 (3.2)19.0 
Comprehensive income$83.3 $60.6 $124.6 
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2017

 
  Common  
stock
 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Accumulated
deficit
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 Non-controlling interest Total    
 (in millions)
Balance at September 30, 2014$1.6
 $1,582.8
 $(1,173.7) $(60.7) $1.6
 $351.6
Net income (loss)
 
 30.9
 
 (0.1) 30.8
Dividends declared
 (12.0) 
 
 
 (12.0)
Stock-based compensation
 4.9
 
 
 
 4.9
Excess tax benefit on stock option exercises
 3.2
 
 
 
 3.2
Shares retained for employee taxes
 (2.4) 
 
 
 (2.4)
Common stock issued
 3.3
 
 
 
 3.3
Stock repurchased under buyback program
 (5.0) 
 
 
 (5.0)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 (6.6) 
 (6.6)
Balance at September 30, 20151.6
 1,574.8
 (1,142.8) (67.3) 1.5
 367.8
Net income (loss)
 
 63.9
 
 (0.3) 63.6
Dividends declared
 (16.1) 
 
 
 (16.1)
Stock-based compensation
 5.2
 
 
 
 5.2
Shares retained for employee taxes
 (3.3) 
 
 
 (3.3)
Common stock issued
 3.3
 
 
 
 3.3
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 (1.0) 
 (1.0)
Balance at September 30, 20161.6
 1,563.9
 (1,078.9) (68.3) 1.2
 419.5
Net income (loss)
 
 123.3
 
 (0.1) 123.2
Dividends declared
 (24.0) 
 
 
 (24.0)
Stock-based compensation
 6.2
 
 
 
 6.2
Shares retained for employee taxes
 (2.7) 
 
 
 (2.7)
Common stock issued
 5.8
 
 
 
 5.8
Stock repurchased under buyback program
 (55.0) 
 
 
 (55.0)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax
 
 
 16.5
 
 16.5
Balance at September 30, 2017$1.6
 $1,494.2
 $(955.6) $(51.8) $1.1
 $489.5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F- 6

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY
MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 Year ended September 30,
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Operating activities:     
Net income$123.3
 $63.9
 $30.9
Less income from discontinued operations69.0
 18.8
 18.4
Income from continuing operations54.3
 45.1
 12.5
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation19.8
 18.3
 17.5
Amortization22.1
 21.2
 25.9
Pension plans3.4
 21.0
 1.1
Deferred income taxes(5.7) (6.6) 5.0
Stock-based compensation6.0
 4.7
 4.0
Loss on early extinguishment of debt
 
 31.3
Loss on Walter receivable
 
 11.6
Other, net1.1
 3.8
 4.6
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:     
Receivables(9.9) (12.3) (3.2)
Inventories(1.9) 3.5
 (21.4)
Other assets(3.4) (5.7) (0.2)
Pension obligations, related to contributions(35.0) 
 (1.2)
Other liabilities8.6
 21.5
 (29.4)
Net cash provided by operating activities59.4
 114.5
 58.1
Investing activities:     
Capital expenditures(40.6) (31.5) (27.2)
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(26.6) 
 0.3
Proceeds from sales of assets0.9
 0.3
 4.5
Net cash used in investing activities(66.3) (31.2) (22.4)
Financing activities:     
Dividends paid(24.0) (16.1) (12.0)
Repayment of debt(4.9) (5.0) (589.0)
Shares retained for employee taxes(2.7) (3.3) (2.4)
Common stock issued5.8
 3.3
 3.3
Deferred financing costs paid(1.0) (1.2) (8.5)
Issuance of debt
 
 512.5
Stock repurchased under buyback program(55.0) 
 (5.0)
Excess tax benefit on stock-based compensation
 
 3.2
Other0.4
 (1.4) (1.1)
Net cash used in financing activities(81.4) (23.7) (99.0)
Net cash flows from discontinued operations:     
Operating activities(43.3) 30.6
 29.7
Investing activities297.2
 (7.9) (9.2)
Financing activities(0.1) 
 
Net cash provided by discontinued operations253.8
 22.7
 20.5
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash1.2
 (0.4) (5.2)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents166.7
 81.9
 (48.0)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year195.0
 113.1
 161.1
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$361.7
 $195.0
 $113.1
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2020

  Common  
stock
Additional
paid-in
capital
Accumulated
deficit
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Non-controlling interestTotal    
 (in millions)
Balance at September 30, 2017$1.6 $1,494.2 $(955.6)$(51.8)$1.1 $489.5 
Net income105.6 0.4 106.0 
Dividends declared(30.1)(30.1)
Stock-based compensation5.2 5.2 
Shares retained for employee taxes(2.1)(2.1)
Common stock issued7.3 7.3 
Stock repurchased under buyback program(30.0)(30.0)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax19.0 19.0 
Balance at September 30, 20181.6 1,444.5 (850.0)(32.8)1.5 564.8 
Net income63.8 0.7 64.5 
Dividends declared(32.0)(32.0)
Stock-based compensation4.3 4.3 
Shares retained for employee taxes(1.3)(1.3)
Common stock issued5.2 5.2 
Stock repurchased under buyback program(10.0)(10.0)
Other comprehensive income, net of tax(3.2)(3.2)
Balance at September 30, 20191.6 1,410.7 (786.2)(36.0)2.2 592.3 
Net income72.0 72.0 
Dividends declared(33.1)(33.1)
Stock-based compensation5.3 5.3 
Shares retained for employee taxes(0.9)(0.9)
Common stock issued3.5 3.5 
Stock repurchased under buyback program(5.0)(5.0)
Acquisition of joint venture partner’s interest(2.5)(2.2)(4.7)
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax11.3 11.3 
Balance at September 30, 2020$1.6 $1,378.0 $(714.2)$(24.7)$$640.7 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F- 7

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
 Year ended September 30,
 202020192018
 (in millions)
Operating activities:
Net income$72.0 $63.8 $105.6 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation29.6 26.0 20.9 
Amortization28.2 27.0 22.8 
Retirement plans2.8 2.0 2.8 
Deferred income taxes7.2 1.3 (43.3)
Stock-based compensation5.3 4.3 5.2 
Loss on early extinguishment of debt6.5 
Gain on disposal of assets(2.5)(9.0)
Other, net8.0 2.4 3.4 
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions:
Receivables(7.5)(1.4)(18.9)
Inventories24.9 (17.4)(18.4)
Other assets0.9 (7.4)(2.0)
Accounts payable(17.6)(11.0)7.7 
Walter Energy accrual (payment)(22.0)22.0 
Other current liabilities6.6 (6.1)32.7 
Pension obligations, related to contributions(0.7)
Long-term liabilities1.9 (9.8)17.1 
Net cash provided by operating activities140.3 92.5 133.1 
Investing activities:
Capital expenditures(67.7)(86.6)(55.7)
Business acquisitions, net of cash acquired(127.5)
Proceeds from sales of assets0.2 2.3 7.8 
Net cash used in investing activities(67.5)(211.8)(47.9)
Financing activities:
Dividends paid(33.1)(32.0)(30.1)
Acquisition of joint venture partner’s interest(5.2)
Stock repurchased under buyback program(5.0)(10.0)(30.0)
Common stock issued3.5 5.2 7.3 
Employee taxes related to stock-based compensation(0.9)(1.3)(2.1)
Repayment of debt(486.3)
Repayment of Krausz debt(13.2)
Issuance of debt450.0 
Deferred financing costs paid(1.1)(6.9)
Other0.4 0.4 (0.2)
Net cash used in financing activities(41.4)(50.9)(98.3)
Effect of currency exchange rate changes on cash0.8 (0.2)(1.5)
Net change in cash and cash equivalents32.2 (170.4)(14.6)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year176.7 347.1 361.7 
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$208.9 $176.7 $347.1 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the consolidated financial statements.
F- 8

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

MUELLER WATER PRODUCTS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR THE THREE YEARS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 20172020
Note 1.
Organization
Note 1.Organization
Mueller Water Products, Inc., a Delaware corporation, together with its consolidated subsidiaries, operates in two2 business segments: Infrastructure and Technologies. Infrastructure (previously referred to as “Mueller Co.”) manufactures valves for water and gas systems, including butterfly, iron gate, tapping, check, knife, plug, automatic control and ball valves, as well as dry-barrel and wet-barrel fire hydrants.hydrants and pipe repair products. Technologies (previously referred to as “Mueller Technologies”) offers metering systems, leak detection, pipe condition assessment and other products and services for the water infrastructure industry. The “Company,” “we,” “us” or “our” refer to Mueller Water Products, Inc. and its subsidiaries. With regard to the Company’s segments, “we,” “us” or “our” may also refer to the segment being discussed.
In July 2014, Infrastructure acquired a 49% ownership in an industrial valve joint-venture for $1.7 million. Due to substantive control features in the joint-venture agreement, all of the joint venture’s assets, liabilities and results of operations arewere included in our consolidated financial statements. We included an adjustment for the lossincome attributable to noncontrolling interest in selling, general and administrative expenses. Noncontrolling interest iswas recorded at its carrying value, which approximatesapproximated fair value. Infrastructure acquired the noncontrolling interest on October 3, 2019.
On December 3, 2018, we completed our acquisition of Krausz Development Ltd. and subsidiaries (“Krausz”). We include the financial statements of Krausz in our consolidated financial statements on a one-month lag. Refer to Note 5. for additional disclosures related to the acquisition.
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”), which require us to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, sales and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities for the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications have been made to previously reported amounts to conform to the current presentation.
Unless the context indicates otherwise, whenever we refer to a particular year, we mean our fiscal year ended or ending September 30 in that particular calendar year.
Note 2.
Note 2.Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Revenue Recognition-Revenue is recognized when delivery of products has occurred or services have been rendered and there is persuasive evidence of a sales arrangement, selling prices are fixed or determinable and collectibility is reasonably assured. Revenue is reported net of estimated discounts, returns and rebates as “net sales.”Significant Accounting Policies
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued new guidance for the recognition of revenue and requiring additional financial statement disclosures.  We plan to adopt this guidance using the modified retrospective transition method beginning in the first quarter of fiscal 2019. We have completed our initial scoping and are developing a project plan to classify our revenue streams, to evaluate revenue recognition practices for each stream against the new requirements, to consider changes to the terms of our sales contracts, and to design and implement processes to quantify the effects of necessary changes. This work is ongoing, but at this time, we do not expect the new guidance to materially impact our stockholders' equity, net sales or operating income.
Stock-based Compensation-Compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and directors is based on the fair value at the grant dates for our stock-settled share awards and is based on the fair value at each reporting date for our cash-settled share awards. See Note 11. for more information regarding our stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense is a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.
At March 31, 2016, we adopted FASB Accounting Standards Update 2016-09 Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. Most significantly, this update changes the accounting for “excess tax benefits” related to stock-based compensation awards by requiring such benefits be included in earnings, rather than recorded directly to additional paid-in capital.
Cash and Cash Equivalents-All highly liquid investments with remaining maturities of 90 days or less when purchased are classified as cash equivalents. Where there is no right of offset against cash balances, outstanding checks are included in accounts payable.
Receivables-Receivables are amounts due from customers. To reduce credit risk, credit investigations are generally performed prior to accepting orders from new customers and, when necessary, letters of credit, bonds or other instruments are required to ensure payment.

F- 8

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We present trade receivables net of an allowance for credit losses. Our consolidated statements of operations reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized trade receivables, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period.
When we determine a specific trade receivable will not be collected, we charge off the uncollectible amount against the allowance. Our periodic evaluations of expected credit losses are based upon our judgments regarding prior collection experience, specific customer creditworthiness, other current conditions, and forecasts of current economic trends within the industries served that may affect the collectibilitycollectability of the reported amounts. Significantly weaker than anticipated industry or economic conditions could impact customers’ ability to pay such that actual credit losses may be greater than the amounts provided for in this allowance.
When
F- 9

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

During 2016, FASB issued standard ASC 326 - Current Expected Credit Losses to replace the existing GAAP “incurred loss” impairment approach with an approach intended to reflect “expected credit losses,” which will require consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates. We will be required to use a forward-looking expected credit loss model for receivables. While we determine a specific trade receivable willare in process of completing our analysis, we do not expect the effect of this adoption on October 1, 2020 on our financial statements to be collected, we charge off the uncollectible amount against the allowance.material.
The following table summarizes information concerning our allowance for credit losses.
202020192018
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$3.5 $4.0 $4.1 
Provision charged to expense1.0 0.3 0.5 
Balances written off, net of recoveries(0.2)(0.7)
Reclassification due to adoption of revenue accounting standard(0.6)
Other0.3 0.1 
Balance at end of year$4.8 $3.5 $4.0 
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$4.5
 $3.9
 $3.8
Provision charged to expense0.3
 0.6
 0.2
Balances written off, net of recoveries(0.8) 
 (0.2)
Other0.1
 
 0.1
Balance at end of year$4.1
 $4.5
 $3.9
Inventories-Inventories are recorded at the lower of first-in, first-out method cost or estimated net realizable value. We evaluate our inventory in terms of excess and obsolete exposures. This evaluation includes such factors as anticipated usage, inventory turnover, inventory levels and ultimate product sales value. Inventory cost includes an overhead component that is affected by levels of production and actual costs incurred. We periodically evaluate the effects of production levels and costs capitalized as part of inventory.
The following table summarizes information concerning our inventory valuation reserves.
202020192018
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$7.5 $5.1 $4.4 
Provision charged to expense4.7 3.4 2.2 
Inventory disposed(0.7)(1.2)(1.2)
Other0.2 0.2 (0.3)
Balance at end of year$11.7 $7.5 $5.1 
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$4.6
 $4.4
 $4.8
Provision charged to expense2.0
 2.1
 1.4
Inventory disposed(2.1) (2.1) (1.8)
Other(0.1) 0.2
 
Balance at end of year$4.4
 $4.6
 $4.4
Other Current Assets-Other current assets include maintenance supplies and tooling costs. Costs for perishable tools and maintenance items are expensed when put into service. Costs for more durable items are amortized over their estimated useful lives, ranging from 3 to 10 years.
Property, Plant and Equipment-Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost, less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. Estimated useful lives are 10 to 20 years for land improvements, 10 to 40 years for buildings and 3 to 15 years for machinery and equipment. Leasehold improvements and capitalized leases are depreciated using the straight-line method over the lesser of the useful life of the asset or the remaining lease term. Gains and losses upon disposition are reflected in operating results in the period of disposition.
Direct internal and external costs to implement computer systems and internal-use software are capitalized. Capitalized costs are depreciated over the estimated useful life of the system or software, generally 6 years, beginning when site installation or module developmentsoftware is complete and ready for its intended use.
Liabilities are recognized at fair value for asset retirement obligations related to plant and landfill closures in the period in which they are reasonably estimable and the carrying amounts of the related long-lived assets are correspondingly increased. Over time, the liabilities are accreted to their estimated future values. At September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, asset retirement obligations were $3.8 million and $7.5$4.5 million, respectively.

Leases- Refer to Note 4. for information regarding our leases.
F- 9

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


During 2016, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2016-02 Leases, which will require us to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities for those leases currently referred to as operating leases. This requirement is effective for 2020, although early adoption is permitted. The update allows for several different methods of application and adoption of the requirement. We are currently evaluating these methods, in what period we will adopt the requirement, and the impact of this requirement, which we do not believe will be material to our consolidated financial statements as a whole.
Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets-We test indefinite-lived intangible assets and goodwill for impairment annually (or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment.) We perform our annual impairment testing at September 1. We amortize finite-lived intangible assets over their respective estimated useful lives and review for impairment if events or circumstances indicate possible impairment. Refer to Note 6. for information regarding our impairment testing.
F- 10

Index to Financial Statements

Workers Compensation-Our exposure to workers compensation claims is generally limited to $1 million per incident. Liabilities, including those related to claims incurred but not reported, are recorded principally using annual valuations based on discounted future expected payments and using historical data combined with insurance industry data when historical data is limited. We are indemnified under an agreement with a predecessor to Tyco for all Mueller Co. and Anvil workers compensation liabilities related to incidents that occurred prior to August 16, 1999. See Note 17. We retained U.S. Pipe workers compensation liabilities related to incidents that occurred prior to the segment'ssegment’s April 1, 2012 sale date, but the purchaser agreed to reimburse us for up to $11.8 million in payments we make related to these liabilities. At September 30, 2017,2020, the remaining reimbursementsdiscounted reimbursement receivable may be up to $4.1$2.3 million, which we have recorded on a discounted basis as $0.5$0.4 million in other current assets and $3.6$1.9 million in other noncurrent assets. On an undiscounted basis, workers compensation liabilities were $10.7$7.2 million and $13.7$8.7 million at September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, respectively. On a discounted basis, workers compensationFor purposes of discounting these liabilities, were $9.1 million and $11.8 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Wewe apply a discount rate at a risk-free interestdiscount rate, generally a U.S. Treasury bill rate, for each policy period. TheWe apply the rate used is one with a duration that corresponds to the weighted average expected payout period for each policy period. Once a discount rate is applied to a policy period, it remains the discount rate for that policy period until all claims are paid. On a discounted basis, workers compensation liabilities were $6.2 million and $7.6 million at September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.
Warranty Costs-We accrue for warranty expenses, thatwhich can include customer costs of repair and/or replacement, including labor, materials, equipment, freight and reasonable overhead costs. We accrue for the estimated cost of product warranties at the time of sale if such costs are determined to be probable and reasonably estimable at that time. Warranty cost estimates are revised throughout applicableWe monitor and analyze our warranty periodsexperience and costs periodically and may revise our warranty accruals as better information regardingnecessary. Critical factors in our accrual analyses include warranty terms, specific claim situations, general incurred and projected failure rates, the nature of product failures, product and labor costs, becomes available.and general business conditions.
As discussed in Note 17. weWe recognized $9.8$14.1 million of Technologies'Technologies’ warranty expense during the year ended September 30, 20172018 related to certain radios and other products sold in prior periods.
Activity in accrued warranty, reported as part of both other current liabilities and other noncurrent liabilities, is presented below.
202020192018
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$17.1 $20.0 $8.5 
Warranty accruals2.6 3.9 18.7 
Warranty costs(5.3)(6.8)(7.2)
Balance at end of year$14.4 $17.1 $20.0 
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$2.0
 $2.9
 $2.4
Warranty expense12.3
 5.3
 5.1
Warranty payments(5.8) (6.2) (4.6)
Balance at end of year$8.5
 $2.0
 $2.9
Deferred Financing Costs-Costs of debt financing are charged to expense over the lives of the related financing agreements. Remaining costs and the future period over which they would be charged to expense are reassessed when amendments to the related financing agreements or prepayments occur.
ABL Agreement deferred financing costs are included in other noncurrent assets and other deferred financing costs are offset against long-term debt in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Deferred financing costs of $7.4$6.2 million at September 30, 20172020 are scheduled to amortize as follows: $1.5$1.3 million related to the ABL Agreement amortizes on a straight-line basis; $5.9$4.9 million related to the Term LoanSenior Unsecured Notes amortizes using the effective-interest rate method. All such amortization will be over the remaining term of the respective debt. SeeRefer to Note 7.8. for disclosures related to our ABL agreement.
Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities-We managePrior to June 30, 2018, we managed interest rate risk to some extent using derivative instruments. We had designated our interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges of interest payments. As a result, the changes in the fair value of these contracts prior to settlement arewere reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and arewere reclassified into earnings in the periods during which the hedged transactions affectaffected earnings.

F- 10

Table We recorded a cash gain of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


$2.4 million in the quarter ended June 30, 2018 upon termination of the interest rate swaps.
We also manage U.S. dollar - Canadian dollar exchange rate risk related to an intercompany loan with swap contracts, thatwhich we have not designated as hedges. As a result, the changes in the fair value of these contracts are reported currently in earnings.
F- 11

Index to Financial Statements

Income Taxes-Deferred tax liabilities and deferred tax assets are recognized for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Such liabilities and assets are determined based on the differences between the financial statement basis and the tax basis of assets and liabilities, using tax rates in effect for the years in which the differences are expected to reverse. A valuation allowance is provided when, based upon the available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
We only record tax benefits for positions that management believes are more likely than not of being sustained under audit based solely on the technical merits of the associated tax position. The amount of tax benefit recognized for any position that meets the more likely than not threshold is the largest amount of the tax benefit that we believe is greater than 50% likely of being realized.
On December 22, 2017, HR-1, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Act”), was enacted, which made significant revisions to federal income tax laws, including lowering the corporate income tax rate to 21% from 35% effective January 1, 2018, overhauling the taxation of income earned outside the United States and eliminating or limiting certain deductions. The Act subjects us to current tax on global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by certain of our foreign subsidiaries. The Act states that we can make an accounting policy election to either recognize deferred taxes for temporary differences expected to reverse as GILTI in future years or provide for the tax expense related to GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. We have elected to recognize the tax on GILTI as a period expense in the period the tax is incurred.
In September 2018, we adopted Accounting Standards Update 2018-02 Income Statement—Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which permits, but does not require, companies to reclassify from accumulated other comprehensive loss to retained earnings any “stranded tax effects” caused by the Act. We have elected to not make such a reclassification.
Environmental Expenditures-We capitalize environmental expenditures that increase the life or efficiency of noncurrent assets or that reduce or prevent environmental contamination. We accrue for environmental expenses resulting from existing conditions that relate to past operations when the costs are probable and reasonably estimable. We are indemnified under an agreement with a predecessor to Tyco for certain environmental liabilities that existed at August 16, 1999. SeeRefer to Note 17.18. for additional disclosures regarding our environmental liabilities.
Revenue Recognition-Refer to Note 3. for disclosures regarding our revenues.
Stock-based Compensation-Compensation expense for stock-based awards granted to employees and directors is based on the fair value at the grant dates for our stock-settled share awards and is based on the fair value at each reporting date for our cash-settled share awards. Refer to Note 12. for more information regarding our stock-based compensation. Stock-based compensation expense is a component of selling, general and administrative expenses.
Research and Development-Research and development costs are expensed as incurred.
Advertising-Advertising costs are expensed as incurred.
Translation of Foreign Currency-Assetsand liabilities of our businesses whose functional currency iscurrencies are other than the U.S. dollar are translated into U.S. dollars using currency exchange rates at the balance sheet date. Revenues and expenses are translated at average currency exchange rates during the period. Foreign currency translation gains and losses are reported as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in operating resultsearnings as incurred.
Note 3.Divestiture
On January 6, 2017,Note 3.Revenue from Contracts with Customers
We recognize revenue when control of promised products or services is transferred to our customers, in amounts that reflect the consideration to which we sold Anvilexpect to affiliatesbe entitled in exchange for those products or services. We account for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of One Equity Partnersthe parties are identified, the payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable. We determine the appropriate revenue recognition for our contracts with customers by analyzing the type, terms and conditions of each contract or arrangement with a customer.
Disaggregation of Revenue
Refer to Note 17. for disaggregation our revenues from contracts with customers by reportable segment and by geographical region, which we believe best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our revenue and cash proceedsflows are affected by economic factors. Geographical region represents the location of $305.7 millionthe customer.
F- 12

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Contract Asset and Liability Balances
Differences in the agreement bytiming of revenue recognition, billing and cash collection result in customer receivables, advance payments and billings in excess of revenue recognized. Customer receivables include amounts billed and currently due from customers as well as unbilled amounts (contract assets). Amounts are billed in accordance with contractual terms and unbilled amounts arise when the purchasertiming of billing differs from the timing of revenue recognized.
Advance payments and billings in excess of revenue are recognized and recorded as deferred revenue, the majority of which is classified as current based on the timing when we expect to reimburse us for expenditures to settle certain previously existing liabilities.recognize revenue. We include current deferred revenue as part of our accrued expenses. Deferred revenues represent contract liabilities and are recorded when customers remit cash payments in advance of our satisfaction of performance obligations under contractual arrangements. Contract liabilities are reversed when the performance obligation is satisfied and revenue is recognized.
The table below presentsrepresents the balances of our customer receivables and deferred revenues.
 September 30,
 20202019
 (in millions)
Billed receivables$180.2 $171.0 
Unbilled receivables4.6 4.5 
     Total customer receivables, gross$184.8 $175.5 
Deferred revenues$5.6 $4.7 
Performance Obligations
A performance obligation is a summarypromise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer. Our performance obligations are satisfied at a point in time as related to sales of equipment or over time as related to our software hosting and leak detection monitoring services. Performance obligations are supported by customer contracts, which provide frameworks for the nature of the distinct products or services. We allocate the transaction price of each contract to the performance obligations on the basis of standalone selling price and recognize revenue when, or as, control of the performance obligation transfers to the customers.
We have elected to use the practical expedient to not adjust the transaction price of a contract for the effects of a significant financing component if, at the inception of the contract, we expect that the period between when we transfer a product or service to a customer and when a customer remits payment will be one year or less.
Revenues from products and services transferred to customers at a point in time represented 99% of our revenues in the year ended September 30, 2020. The revenues recognized at a point in time related to the sale of Anvil,our products and was recognized when the obligations of the terms of our contract were satisfied, which generally occurs upon shipment, when control of the product transfers to the customer.
Revenues from products and services transferred to customers over time represented 1% of our revenues in millions.the year ended September 30, 2020.
We offer warranties to our customers in the form of assurance-type warranties, which provide assurance that the products provided will function as intended and comply with any agreed-upon specifications. These cannot be purchased separately.
Gross cash proceeds$305.7
Noncash proceeds1.9
Total proceeds307.6
Transaction expenses(8.3)
Net proceeds299.3
Assets and liabilities disposed(189.8)
Gain on sale, pre-tax109.5
Income tax(41.6)
Gain on sale, net of tax$67.9
Costs to Obtain or Fulfill a Contract

We incur certain incremental costs to obtain a contract, which primarily relate to incremental sales commissions. Our commissions are paid based on a combination of orders and shipments and we reserve the right to claw back any commissions in case of product returns or lost collections. As the expected benefit associated with these incremental costs is generally one year or less based on the nature of the product sold and benefits received, we have applied a practical expedient and therefore do not capitalize the related costs and expense them as incurred, consistent with our previous accounting treatment.
F- 1113

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Note 4.        Leases
The table below presents a summaryWe adopted the new leasing standard utilizing the modified retrospective approach on October 1, 2019. Adoption of the operating results for the Anvil discontinued operations. These operating results do not reflect what they would have been had Anvil not been classified as discontinued operations.
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Net sales$83.1
 $338.3
 $371.1
Cost of sales62.8
 241.9
 270.1
Gross profit20.3
 96.4
 101.0
Operating expenses:     
Selling, general and administrative17.2
 67.6
 69.7
Other charges0.2
 1.1
 1.3
Total operating expenses17.4
 68.7
 71.0
Operating income2.9
 27.7
 30.0
Interest expense, net
 
 0.1
Income before income taxes2.9
 27.7
 29.9
Income tax expense1.8
 8.9
 11.5
 1.1

18.8
 18.4
Gain on sale, net of tax67.9
 
 
Income from discontinued operations$69.0
 $18.8
 $18.4
The table below presents the components of the balance sheet accounts classified asnew standard resulted in an increase to total assets and liabilities helddue to the recording of lease right-of-use assets (“ROU”) and lease liabilities related to our operating lease portfolio.
We elected the package of three practical expedients for saletransition, which include the carry forward of our leases without reassessing whether any contracts are leases or contain leases, lease classification and initial direct costs and applying hindsight when determining the lease term and when assessing impairment of right-of-use assets at the adoption date. This allows us to update our assessments according to new information and changes in facts and circumstances that have occurred since lease inception.
Presentation of Leases
We lease certain office, warehouse, manufacturing, distribution, and research and development facilities and equipment under operating leases.
Our leases have remaining lease terms of up to 13 years. The terms and conditions of our leases may include options to extend or terminate the lease which are considered and included in the lease term when these options are reasonably certain of exercise.
We determine if a contract is (or contains) a lease at inception by evaluating whether the contract conveys the right to control the use of an identified asset. For all classes of leased assets, we have elected the practical expedient to account for any non-lease components in the contract together with the related net deferred income tax liability.lease component in the same unit of account.
 September 30,
 2016
 (in millions)
Assets: 
Receivables, net$54.9
Inventories83.1
Other current assets4.1
Total current assets held for sale142.1
  
Property, plant and equipment, net46.7
Intangible assets51.4
Other noncurrent assets1.8
Total noncurrent assets held for sale99.9
Total assets held for sale$242.0
  
Liabilities: 
Current portion of long-term debt$0.3
Accounts payable27.1
Other current liabilities17.4
Total current liabilities held for sale44.8
  
Long-term debt0.4
Other noncurrent liabilities0.4
Total noncurrent liabilities held for sale0.8
Total liabilities held for sale$45.6
  
Net deferred income tax liability associated with discontinued operations$13.0

F- 12

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Note 4.
Acquisition
On February 15, 2017, we acquired Singer Valve, a manufacturer of automatic control valves, and its affiliates for aggregate cash consideration of $26.6 million, net of post-closing adjustments. Singer Valve had net sales of approximately $15 million in calendar 2016 and is included in Infrastructure. The preliminary allocation of consideration to theROU assets and lease liabilities are recognized in our consolidated balance sheets at the commencement date based on the present value of these companies,remaining lease payments over the lease term. Additionally, ROU assets include any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, as well as any initial direct costs incurred, and are reduced by any lease incentives received. As most of our operating leases do not provide an implicit rate, we apply our incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of remaining lease payments. Our incremental borrowing rate is determined based on information available at the commencement date of the lease.
For all classes of leased assets, we have applied an accounting policy election to exclude short-term leases from recognition in our consolidated balance sheets. A short-term lease has a lease term of 12 months or less at the commencement date and does not include a purchase option that is reasonably certain of exercise. We recognize short-term lease expense in our condensed consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
Our short-term lease expense for the year ended September 30, 2020 and short-term lease commitments at September 30, 2020 are immaterial.
We have certain lease contracts with terms and conditions that provide for variability in the payment amount based on changes in facts or circumstances occurring after the commencement date. These variable lease payments are recognized in our condensed consolidated statements of operations as the obligation is incurred.
At September 30, 2020, any legally-binding minimum lease payments for operating leases signed but not yet commenced, subleases, leases that imposed significant restrictions or covenants, related party leases or sale-leaseback arrangements were immaterial.
The components of lease cost are presented below.
Year ended September 30,
202020192018
(in millions)
Operating lease cost$6.3 $5.8 $6.4 
Finance lease cost1.3 1.0 0.8 
Total lease expense$7.6 $6.8 $7.2 
Supplemental cash flow information related to leases for the year ended September 30, 2020 is presented below, in millions.
Operating cash used for operating leases$6.1 
Financing cash used for finance leases$1.3 
F- 14

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Assets acquired, net of cash: 
Receivables$3.0
Inventories5.8
Other current assets0.2
Property, plant and equipment1.0
Intangible assets11.4
Goodwill7.2
Liabilities assumed: 
Accounts payable0.7
Other current liabilities0.4
Current and long term debt0.1
Deferred income tax liability0.8
Consideration paid$26.6
Supplemental information describing where lease-related assets and liabilities are reflected in the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2020 is presented below, in millions.
Right of use assets:
Operating leasesOther noncurrent assets$25.6 
Finance leasesPlant, property and equipment2.5 
Total right of use assets$28.1 
Lease liabilities:
Operating leases - currentOther current liabilities$4.0 
Operating leases - noncurrentOther noncurrent liabilities23.3 
Finance leases - currentCurrent portion of long-term debt1.1 
Finance leases - noncurrentLong-term debt1.4 
Total lease liabilities$29.8 
Supplemental information related to lease terms and discount rates at September 30, 2020 is presented below.
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases7.87
Finance leases2.52
Weighted-average interest rate:
Operating leases5.64 %
Finance leases4.96 %
Total lease liabilities at September 30, 2020 have scheduled maturities as follows:
Operating LeasesFinance Leases
(in millions)
2021$5.5 $1.2 
20224.8 0.9 
20234.3 0.5 
20244.1 0.1 
20253.7 
Thereafter12.5 
Total lease payments34.9 2.7 
Less: imputed interest7.6 0.2 
Present value of lease liabilities$27.3 $2.5 

Note 5.    Acquisitions and Divestitures
Divestiture of Burlington plant
On December 4, 2017, we sold an idle property in Burlington, New Jersey that had previously been a plant in our former U.S. Pipe segment and recorded a gain of $9.0 million in our Corporate segment. We received $7.4 million, recorded net current assets of $0.8 million and conveyed plant, property and equipment with a net carrying value of $0.4 million, and the buyer assumed related environmental liabilities with a carrying value of $1.2 million.
Acquisition of Krausz
On December 3, 2018, we completed our acquisition of the outstanding equity of Krausz, a manufacturer of pipe couplings, grips and clamps with operations in the United States and Israel, for $140.7 million, net of cash acquired, including the assumption and simultaneous repayment of certain debt of $13.2 million. The acquisition of Krausz was financed with cash on hand. We believe that the Krausz product line is complementary to our existing Infrastructure products and will improve our positioning in the pipe repair market.
F- 15

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

We have recognized the assets acquired and liabilities assumed at their estimated acquisition date fair values, with the excess of the purchase price over the estimated fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired recorded as goodwill. During 2020, we reduced property, plant and equipment by $0.3 million, which resulted in an increase to goodwill of $0.3 million. The accounting for the business combination is considered final.
The results of Krausz, including net sales of $37.2 million for 2019, are included within our Infrastructure segment for all periods following the acquisition date.
The goodwill recognized represents expected benefits ofbelow is attributable to the strategic opportunities and synergies that we expect to arise from the acquisition that do not qualify for recognition as intangible assetsof Krausz and the value of its workforce. The goodwill is deductiblenondeductible for income tax purposes. Identified intangible assets consist of patents, customer relationships and favorable leasehold interests with an estimated weighted average useful life of approximately 12 years and trade names with an indefinite life. Values of intangible assets were determined using a discounted cash flow method.
The following is a summary of the estimated fair values of the net assets acquired (in millions):
Note 5.Assets, net of cash:
Intangible Assets
Receivables$6.9 
Inventories17.0 
Other current assets0.2 
Property, plant and equipment8.1 
Other non-current assets1.7 
Identified intangible assets:
     Patents32.1 
     Customer relationships8.7 
     Trade names4.6 
     Favorable leasehold interests2.3 
Goodwill80.4 
Liabilities:
Accounts payable(5.5)
Other current liabilities(2.9)
Deferred income taxes(11.2)
Other non-current liabilities(1.7)
Consideration paid140.7 
  Repayment of Krausz debt(13.2)
     Consideration paid included in net cash used in investing activities$127.5 

Note 6.Intangible Assets and Goodwill
At March 31, 2020, as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, we performed a quantitative interim impairment assessment for goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets associated with the Krausz acquisition and concluded that these assets were not impaired.
We completed our annual goodwill impairment test and determined there were no impairments at September 1, 2020.
Intangible Assets
Direct internal and external costs to develop software usedlicensed by Technologies'Technologies’ customers are capitalized. Capitalized costs are amortized over the 6-year estimated useful life of the software, beginning when the software is complete and ready for sale.its intended use. At September 30, 2017,2020, the remaining weighted-average amortization period for external-usethis software was 3.7 2.0 years. Amortization expense related to such software assets was $2.4$3.3 million, $1.9$3.3 million and $1.6$2.9 million for 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the next five years is scheduled to be $3.9 million in 2018, $3.6 million in 2019, $3.3 million in 2020, $2.6$3.2 million in 2021, and $2.1$2.7 million in 2022.2022, $2.2 million in 2023, $1.5 million in 2024 and $0.8 million in 2025.
F- 16

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

At September 30, 2017,2020, the remaining weighted-average amortization period for the business combination-related finite-lived customer relationship and technology intangible assets was 6.8 years.were 4.2 years and 3.9 years, respectively. Amortization expense related to these assets was $19.7$24.9 million, $19.3$23.7 million and $24.3$19.9 million for 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively. Amortization expense for each of the next five years is scheduled to be $20.0 million in 2018, $19.8 million in 2019, $19.8 million in 2020, $19.8$24.9 million in 2021, and $19.7$24.7 million in 2022.

F- 13

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


2022, $24.7 million in 2023, $24.3 million in 2024 and $4.8 million in 2025.
Intangible assets are presented below.
 September 30,
 20202019
 (in millions)
Capitalized internal-use software:
Cost$31.5 $30.2 
Accumulated amortization(20.8)(17.5)
Net book value10.7 12.7 
Business combination-related:
Cost:
Finite-lived intangible assets:
Technology118.5 116.6 
Customer relationships and other370.2 370.0 
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:
Trade names and trademarks271.6 271.4 
760.4 758.0 
Accumulated amortization:
Technology(81.0)(76.4)
Customer relationships and other(281.2)(260.6)
(362.2)(337.0)
Net book value398.2 421.0 
Total intangible assets net book value$408.9 $433.7 
Goodwill
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill were as follows:
September 30,
20202019
(in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$95.7 $12.1 
Acquisition of Krausz0.3 80.1 
Change in foreign currency exchange rates3.8 3.5 
Balance at end of year$99.8 $95.7 

F- 17
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Capitalized external-use software:   
Cost$28.4
 $20.9
Accumulated amortization(11.3) (8.9)
Net book value17.1
 12.0
    
Business combination-related:   
Cost:   
Finite-lived intangible assets:   
Technology76.7
 76.8
Customer relationships and other359.2
 350.5
Indefinite-lived intangible assets:   
Trade names and trademarks266.8
 263.6
Goodwill12.9
 5.4
 715.6
 696.3
Accumulated amortization:   
Technology(72.2) (71.5)
Customer relationships and other(221.2) (202.2)
 (293.4) (273.7)
Net book value422.2
 422.6
Total intangible assets net book value$439.3
 $434.6

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements
Note 6.
Income Taxes

Note 7.Income Taxes
The components of income before income taxes from continuing operations are presented below.
202020192018
 (in millions)
U.S.$89.7 $78.4 $97.3 
Non-U.S.4.4 3.7 (1.6)
Income before income taxes$94.1 $82.1 $95.7 
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
U.S.$82.7
 $69.7
 $25.2
Non-U.S.(4.2) (0.4) (4.4)
Income before income taxes$78.5
 $69.3
 $20.8
On December 22, 2017, HR-1, commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“Act”), was enacted, which made significant revisions to federal income tax laws, including lowering the corporate income tax rate to 21% from 35% effective January 1, 2018, overhauling the taxation of income earned outside the United States and eliminating or limiting certain deductions. Our deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded at the enacted tax rates in effect when we expect to recognize the related tax expenses or benefits. The average of these rates varies slightly from year to year but historically had been approximately 39%. With the legislation changing rates taking place in the quarter ended December 31, 2017, we remeasured our deferred tax items at an average rate of approximately 25% and recorded an income tax benefit of $42.5 million.
The cumulative amountAct also imposed a one-time transition tax on the undistributed, previously-untaxed, post-1986 foreign “earnings and profits” (as defined by the IRS) of undistributedcertain U.S.-owned corporations. In 2018, we recorded a provisional transition tax of $7.5 million for the one-time deemed repatriation tax on accumulated foreign earnings of our foreign subsidiaries. We finalized our calculation of this transition tax liability during 2019 and reduced our initial provision by $0.6 million. At September 30, 2020, the remaining balance of our transition obligation is $5.8 million, which will be paid annually through January 2026, as provided in the Act. Other than for Krausz’s investment in its U.S. subsidiary, we have not provided income taxes for unrepatriated foreign earnings that may be subject to withholding tax or any outside basis differences inherent in our foreign subsidiaries, that we consideras these amounts continue to be indefinitely reinvested and thus forin foreign operations. We have a foreign tax credit carryforward of $4.5 million, which United States income taxeswe have not recognized because we do not expect to utilize it prior to expiration.
The federal income tax returns for Mueller Co. and Anvil are closed for years prior to 2005 and for Mueller Water Products, Inc. for 2007 and 2008. Our 2009 through 2015 returns are closed except to the extent net operating losses from those years have been provided, was $52.4 million at September 30, 2017. It isutilized on subsequent years’ returns. We also remain liable for any taxes related to U.S. Pipe income for periods prior to 2012 pursuant to the terms of the sale agreement with the purchaser of the segment.
Our state income tax returns are generally closed for years prior to 2016, except to the extent of our state net operating loss carryforwards. Our Canadian income tax returns are generally closed for years prior to 2013. We do not currently practical to estimate the amount of unrecognized United States income taxes that might be payable on the repatriation of these earnings.

F- 14



have any material unpaid assessments.
The components of income tax (benefit) expense from continuing operations are presented below.
202020192018
 (in millions)
Current:
U.S. federal$10.9 $11.6 $25.7 
U.S. state and local2.7 3.9 7.1 
Non-U.S.1.3 1.5 0.6 
14.9 17.0 33.4 
Deferred:
U.S. federal5.6 2.5 (42.6)
U.S. state and local2.0 (0.4)(1.0)
Non-U.S.(0.4)(0.8)0.3 
7.2 1.3 (43.3)
Income tax (benefit) expense$22.1 $18.3 $(9.9)
F- 18

 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Current:     
U.S. federal$25.4
 $28.9
 $3.1
U.S. state and local4.0
 2.0
 0.2
Non-U.S.0.5
 (0.1) 
 29.9
 30.8
 3.3
Deferred:     
U.S. federal(4.3) (9.8) 2.8
U.S. state and local(0.2) 3.4
 2.7
Non-U.S.(1.2) (0.2) (0.5)
 (5.7) (6.6) 5.0
Income tax expense$24.2
 $24.2
 $8.3
Index to Financial Statements

The reconciliation between income tax expense at the U.S. federal statutory income tax rate and reported income tax expense from continuing operations is presented below.
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Expense at U.S. federal statutory income tax rate of 35%$27.5
 $24.3
 $7.3
Adjustments to reconcile to income tax expense:     
State income taxes, net of federal benefit2.7
 3.1
 2.0
Domestic production activities deduction(4.5) (3.0) (0.5)
Tax credits(1.4) (2.0) (1.4)
Nondeductible expenses, other than compensation0.6
 0.7
 0.6
Federal valuation allowance0.4
 
 0.5
Foreign income taxes0.3
 0.2
 0.4
Nondeductible compensation0.5
 0.4
 0.3
State tax rate change(0.4) 0.4
 
Excess tax benefits related to stock compensation(2.1) (0.5) 
Other0.6
 0.6
 (0.9)
Income tax expense$24.2
 $24.2
 $8.3

F- 15



Deferred income tax balances are presented below.
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Deferred income tax assets:   
Inventory reserves$12.0
 $14.8
Accrued expenses14.9
 15.0
Pension and other postretirement benefits6.0
 25.0
Stock-based compensation6.2
 7.7
State net operating losses3.2
 5.0
Federal credit carryovers0.9
 0.6
Other2.7
 4.8
 45.9
 72.9
Valuation allowance(1.5) (0.9)
Total deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance44.4
 72.0
Deferred income tax liabilities:   
Intangible assets151.2
 177.0
Other7.2
 3.8
Total deferred income tax liabilities158.4
 180.8
Net deferred income tax liabilities$114.0
 $108.8
    
Balance sheet presentation:   
Deferred income taxes$115.1
 $109.9
Less deferred tax assets included in other noncurrent assets1.1
 1.1
Net deferred income tax liabilities$114.0
 $108.8
We reevaluate the need for a valuation allowance against the U.S. deferred tax assets each quarter, considering results to date, projections of taxable income, tax planning strategies and reversing taxable temporary differences.
Our state net operating loss carryforwards, which expire between calendar years 2018 and 2033, remain available to offset future taxable earnings.
202020192018
(in millions)
Expense at U.S. federal statutory income tax rates of 21%, 24.5% and 35%, respectively$19.8 $17.2 $23.4 
Adjustments to reconcile to income tax expense:
State income taxes, net of federal benefit3.3 3.2 4.8 
Uncertain tax positions1.0 (1.4)
Nondeductible compensation0.6 0.3 0.2 
Nondeductible expenses, other than compensation0.4 1.3 0.5 
Valuation allowances0.1 1.3 0.5 
Basis difference in foreign investment0.1 (1.1)
Foreign income taxes0.1 
Domestic production activities deduction(2.4)
Federal tax rate change(42.5)
Federal transition tax(0.6)7.5 
Excess tax benefits related to stock compensation(0.5)(0.3)(0.6)
Tax credits(1.8)(1.8)(1.7)
Other(0.9)0.1 0.4 
Income tax expense (benefit)$22.1 $18.3 $(9.9)
The following table summarizes information concerning our gross unrecognized tax benefits.
2017 201620202019
(in millions) (in millions)
Balance at beginning of year$2.8
 $2.6
Balance at beginning of year$3.3 $3.3 
Increases related to current year positionsIncreases related to current year positions1.5 0.4 
Increases related to prior year positions0.1
 0.3
Increases related to prior year positions2.0 
Increases related to current year positions0.2
 0.2
Decreases due to lapse in statute of limitations(0.1) (0.3)Decreases due to lapse in statute of limitations(0.3)(2.4)
Balance at end of year$3.0
 $2.8
Balance at end of year$4.5 $3.3 
Substantially all unrecognized tax benefits would, if recognized, impact the effective tax rate. We recognize interest related to uncertain tax positions as interest expense and recognize any penalties incurred as a component of selling, general and administrative expenses. At September 30, 20172020 and 2016,2019, we had $0.7$0.4 million and $0.5$0.3 million, respectively, of accrued interest expense related to unrecognized tax benefits.
We expect to settle certain state income tax audits within the next 12 months and believe it is reasonably possible that these audit settlements will reduce the gross unrecognized tax benefits by $0.8 million.

F- 1619

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



The federalDeferred income tax returnsbalances are presented below.
 September 30,
 20202019
 (in millions)
Deferred income tax assets:
Accrued expenses$12.2 $10.0 
Lease liabilities7.3 
Inventory4.6 11.7 
State net operating losses3.0 2.8 
Federal credit carryovers3.0 2.8 
Stock-based compensation2.6 2.7 
Pension0.2 1.7 
Other1.1 2.4 
34.0 34.1 
Valuation allowance(2.9)(2.8)
Total deferred income tax assets, net of valuation allowance31.1 31.3 
Deferred income tax liabilities:
Intangible assets90.2 95.6 
Lease assets6.6 
Basis difference in foreign investment5.0 4.7 
Other25.6 18.9 
Total deferred income tax liabilities127.4 119.2 
Net deferred income tax liabilities$96.3 $87.9 
We reevaluate the need for Mueller Co. and Anvil are closed for years priora valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets each quarter, considering results to 2005 and for Mueller Water Products, Inc. for 2007 and 2008. Our 2009 through 2012 returns are closed except to the extent net operating losses from those years have been utilized on subsequent years’ returns. Tax years 1980 to 1994 and 1999 to 2001 remain open for our predecessor company, U.S. Pipe, which was a subsidiarydate, projections of Walter Energy in those years. See Note 17. We also remain liable for any taxes related to periods prior to the sale of U.S. Pipe in 2012 pursuant to the terms of the sale agreement with the purchaser of the segment.
Our statetaxable income, tax returns are generally closed for years prior to 2012, except to the extent of ourplanning strategies and reversing taxable temporary differences.
Our state net operating loss carryforwards. Our Canadian income tax returns are generally closed forcarryforwards, which expire between years prior2024 and 2032, remain available to 2009. We are currently under audit by several jurisdictions at various levels of completion. We do not have any material unpaid assessments.offset future taxable earnings.
Note 7.Borrowing Arrangements
Note 8.Borrowing Arrangements
The components of our long-term debt are presented below.
 September 30,
 20202019
 (in millions)
5.5% Senior Notes$450.0 $450.0 
ABL Agreement
Other2.5 2.1 
452.5 452.1 
Less deferred financing costs(4.9)(5.8)
Less current portion of long-term debt(1.1)(0.9)
Long-term debt$446.5 $445.4 
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
ABL Agreement$
 $
Term Loan484.8
 489.4
Other1.7
 1.3
 486.5
 490.7
Deferred financing costs(5.9) (6.3)
Less current portion(5.6) (5.6)
Long-term debt$475.0
 $478.8
The scheduled maturities of all borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2020 for each of the following years are $1.1 million in 2021, $0.9 million in 2022, $0.5 million in 2023, $0.1 million in 2024 and 0 in 2025.
ABL Agreement. Our asset based lending agreement (“ABL Agreement”) consists of a revolving credit facility for up to $225$175 million of revolving credit borrowings, swing line loans and letters of credit. On July 30, 2020, we amended the ABL Agreement. The amendment, among other things, (i) extended the termination date of the facility, (ii) established a LIBOR “floor” of 75 basis points, (iii) increased interest rates on borrowings, (iv) increased the rate of unused commitment fee, and (v) increased our ability to pay cash dividends.
F- 20

Index to Financial Statements

The amended ABL Agreement also permits us to increase the size of the credit facility by an additional $150 million in certain circumstances subject to adequate borrowing base availability. We may borrow up to $25 million through swing line loans and may have up to $60 million of letters of credit outstanding.
Borrowings under the amended ABL Agreement bear interest at a floating rate equal to LIBOR plus a margin ranging from 125200 to 150225 basis points, or a base rate, as defined in the ABL Agreement, plus a margin ranging from 25100 to 50125 basis points. At September 30, 20172020 the applicable rate was LIBOR plus 125200 basis points.
The amended ABL Agreement terminates on July 13, 2021. We pay29, 2025 and requires a commitment fee for any unused borrowing capacity under the ABL Agreement of 2537.5 basis points per annum. Our obligations under the ABL agreement are secured by a first-priority perfected lien on all of our U.S. receivables and inventories, certain cash and other supporting obligations. Borrowings are not subject to any financial maintenance covenants unless excess availability is less than the greater of $17.5 million and 10% of the Loan Cap as defined in the ABL Agreement. Excess availability based on September 30, 20172020 data, as reduced by outstanding letters of credit swap contract liabilities and accrued fees and expenses of $23.6$14.1 million, was approximately $113$133.9 million.
Term Loan. 5.5% Senior Unsecured Notes. On November 25, 2014,June 12, 2018, we entered into a $500.0privately issued $450.0 million senior secured term loanof 5.5% Senior Unsecured Notes (“Term Loan”Notes”), which mature in June 2026 and bear interest at 5.5%. We capitalized $8.5$6.6 million of financing costs, which are being amortized over the term of the Term LoanNotes using the effective interest rate method. The proceedsProceeds from the Term Loan,Notes, along with other cash, were used to prepayrepay our 7.375% Senior SubordinatedTerm Loan. Substantially all of our U.S. Subsidiaries guarantee the Notes, (“Senior Subordinated Notes”) and 8.75% Senior Unsecured Notes (“Senior Unsecured Notes”) andwhich are subordinate to satisfy and discharge our obligationsborrowings under the respective indentures.ABL. Based on quoted market prices, the outstanding Notes had a fair value of $465.8 million at September 30, 2020.
An indenture securing the Notes (“Indenture”) contains customary covenants and events of default, including covenants that limit our ability to incur debt, pay dividends, and make investments. We recordedbelieve we were compliant with these covenants at September 30, 2020 and expect to remain in compliance through September 30, 2021.
We may redeem some or all of the Notes at any time or from time to time prior to June 15, 2021 at certain “make-whole” redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture) and on or after June 15, 2021 at specified redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture). Additionally, we may redeem up to 40% of the aggregate principal amount of the Notes at any time or from time to time prior to June 15, 2021 with the net proceeds of specified equity offerings at specified redemption prices (as set forth in the Indenture). Upon a loss on early extinguishmentchange of debtcontrol (as defined in the Indenture), we will be required to make an offer to purchase the Notes at a price equal to 101% of $31.3the outstanding principal amount of the Notes.
Term Loan. We had a $500.0 million senior secured term loan (“Term Loan”), which consisted of $25.2 million of tender and call premiums, $4.4 million of deferred financing costs and $1.7 million of unamortized discount written off.
The Term Loan accruesaccrued interest at a floating rate equal to LIBOR, subject to a floor of 0.75%, plus 250 basis points. At September 30, 2017, the weighted-average effective interest rate, including amortization of deferred finance costs and original issue discount and the effect of interest rate swaps, was 4.56%. We may voluntarily repay amounts borrowed underrepaid the Term Loan at any time. The principal amounton June 15, 2018 with the proceeds from the issuance of the Notes and cash on hand. We wrote-off the associated deferred debt issuance costs and recorded a loss on the early extinguishment of debt of $6.2 million.
Note 9.Derivative Financial Instruments
Prior to the June 15, 2018 retirement of our Term Loan, is required to be repaid in quarterly installments of $1.225 million, with any remaining principal due on November 25, 2021. The Term Loan is guaranteed by substantially all of our U.S. subsidiaries and is secured by essentially all of our assets, although the ABL Agreement has a senior claim on certain collateral securing borrowings thereunder. The Term Loan is reported net of unamortized discount of $1.5 million. Based on quoted market prices, the outstanding Term Loan had a fair value of $490.9 million at September 30, 2017.

F- 17

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


The Term Loan contains affirmative and negative operating covenants applicable to us and our restricted subsidiaries. We believe we were compliant with these covenants at September 30, 2017 and expect to remain in compliance through September 30, 2018.
The scheduled maturities of all borrowings outstanding at September 30, 2017 for each of the following years are $5.6 million for 2018, $5.4 million for 2019, $5.3 million for 2020, $5.0 million for 2021 and $466.7 million for 2022.
Note 8.
Derivative Financial Instruments
We are exposed to interest rate risk that we managemanaged to some extent using derivative instruments. We terminated these instruments in conjunction with the retirement of the Term Loan. Under our April 2015 interest rate swap contracts, we receivereceived interest calculated using 3-month LIBOR, subject to a floor of 0.750%, and paypaid fixed interest at 2.341%, on an aggregate notional amount of $150.0 million. These swap contracts effectively fixhad fixed the cash interest rate on $150.0 million of our borrowings under the Term Loan at 4.841% through September 30, 2021.
We havehad designated our interest rate swap contracts as cash flow hedges of our future interest payments and elected to apply the “shortcut” method of assessing hedge effectiveness. As a result, the gains and losses on the swap contracts arehad been reported as a component of other comprehensive loss and arewere reclassified into interest expense as the related interest payments arewere made.
Upon termination of the interest rate swaps, we reclassified all associated amounts from accumulated other comprehensive loss to earnings, which resulted in a cash gain of $2.4 million in June 2018.
In connection with the acquisition of Singer Valve discussed in Note 4., Mueller Water Products, Inc.2017, we loaned funds to one of our Canadian subsidiaries. Although this intercompany loan has no direct effect on our consolidated financial statements, it creates exposure to currency risk for the Canadian subsidiary. To reduce this exposure, we entered into a U.S. dollar-Canadian dollar swap contract with the Canadian subsidiary and an offsetting Canadian dollar-U.S. dollar swap with a domestic bank. We have not designated these swaps as hedges and the changes in their fair value are included in earnings, where they offset the currency gains and losses associated with the intercompany loan.
F- 21

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

The fair values of theour currency swap contracts were liabilities of $0.2 million and $0.3 million as of September 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively, and are presented below.included in other noncurrent liabilities in our Consolidated Balance Sheets.
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Interest rate swap contracts, designated as cash flow hedges:   
Other current liabilities$1.2
 $2.0
Other noncurrent liabilities1.3
 5.3
 $2.5
 $7.3
    
Currency swap contracts, not designated as hedges:   
Other noncurrent liabilities$1.3
 $
Note 10.Retirement Plans
The fair values and the classification of the fair values between current and noncurrent portions are based on calculated cash flows using publicly available interest rate forward rate yield curve information, but amounts due at the actual settlement dates are dependent on actual rates in effect at the settlement dates and may differ significantly from amounts shown above.
The fair values of the currency swaps are as reported to us by the bank counterparty, which we believe to be a reliable source.
Note 9.
Retirement Plans
Defined Benefit Plans. We have had various pension plans (“Pension Plans”), which we fundfunded in accordance with their requirements and, where applicable, in amounts sufficient to satisfy the minimum funding requirements of applicable laws. The Pension Plans provideprovided benefits based on years of service and compensation or at stated amounts for each year of service. The annual measurement date for all Pension Plans was September 30. OurAfter September 30, 2019, our only remaining defined benefit plan was our U.S. Pension Plan (“Plan”).
During 2019, we settled our obligations to our Canadian pension plan (“Plan”) comprised 98%participants through a combination of the Pension Plans’ obligationslump-sum payments and 98%purchases of the Pension Plans’ assets at September 30, 2017.
annuities. We made a voluntarynet contribution of $35.0 million to the Planplans of $0.7 million, which was included in 2017. We do not anticipate making any contributions to the Plan in 2018.
During 2016, the Plan completed a pension obligation settlement program targeting vested, terminated participants not yet receiving benefits. Approximately 75% of eligible participants accepted settlement offers. The Plan distributed assets totaling

F- 18

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


$58.5 million. We incurred a non-cash pension settlement charge of $16.6 million as a result of the program, which had an immaterial impact on the Plan’s funded ratio.
During 2015, we contributed $1.2 million to fully fund two of our Canadian plans and recorded a pension settlement charge of $0.5 million. We currently plan to make $1.2 million of contributions to a Canadian pension plan in 2018.
During March 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-07 (“ASU 2017-07”). This amendment to GAAP will require us to exclude from operating income the components of net periodic benefit costcosts other than service, cost. We adoptedto fund these settlements. As a result, we no longer have any plan assets or obligation in connection with any Canadian defined benefit pension plan.
During 2018, under terms of a negotiated labor contract, a group of our collectively bargained employees are no longer accruing benefits under a multi-employer pension plan. The affected employees are now participants in our defined contribution retirement plan with an employer match and one-time contribution of $0.4 million, which vested through 2020. During 2019, we recorded and paid an estimated settlement liability for exiting this amendment on October 1, 2017, and this adoption will require reclassificationplan, which resulted in an expense of amounts$1.1 million, which we included in 2017 and 2016 results. The componentsother charges. As a result, we no longer have any plan assets or obligation in connection with any multi-employer pension plan.
A summary of net periodic benefit costkey assumptions for the valuations of our Pension Plans and the effects this adoption will have on operating income are presentedis below.
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Service cost$2.0
 $1.7
 $1.9
Components of net periodic benefit cost that will be excluded from operating income upon adoption of ASU 2017-07:     
Interest cost14.3
 18.9
 20.1
Expected return on plan assets(16.9) (19.7) (24.6)
Amortization of actuarial net loss4.0
 3.4
 3.2
Pension settlement
 16.6
 0.5
Other
 0.1
 
 1.4
 19.3
 (0.8)
Net periodic benefit cost$3.4
 $21.0
 $1.1
Balance sheet information for Pension Plans with accumulated benefit obligations in excess of plan assets is presented below.
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligations$379.5
 $402.0
Accumulated benefit obligations379.5
 402.0
Fair value of plan assets364.2
 337.9
Balance sheet information for Pension Plans with accumulated benefit obligations less than plan assets is presented below.
 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligations$1.0
 $1.1
Accumulated benefit obligations1.0
 1.1
Fair value of plan assets2.1
 2.1
Pension Plan activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax, in 2017 is presented below, in millions.
Balance at beginning of year$110.8
Actuarial loss(13.5)
Prior year actuarial loss amortization to net periodic cost(4.0)
Other0.1
Balance at end of year$93.4

F- 19

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We amortize amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss representing unrecognized prior year service cost and unrecognized loss related to the Pension Plans over the weighted average life expectancy of their inactive participants.
The components of accumulated other comprehensive loss related to Pension Plans that we expect to amortize into net periodic benefit cost in 2018 are presented below, in millions.
Amortization of unrecognized prior year service cost$
Amortization of unrecognized loss3.2
 $3.2
Amounts recognized for Pension Plans and other postretirement benefit plans are presented below.
 Pension Plans
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligations:   
Beginning of year$403.1
 $428.2
Service cost2.0
 1.7
Interest cost14.3
 18.9
Actuarial loss (gain)(14.5) 37.7
Benefits paid(24.8) (25.1)
Currency translation0.4
 0.2
Decrease in obligation due to curtailment / settlement
 (58.5)
End of year$380.5
 $403.1
Accumulated benefit obligations at end of year$380.5
 $403.1
Plan assets:   
Beginning of year$340.0
 $383.4
Actual return on plan assets15.8
 40.1
Employer contributions35.0
 
Settlement
 (58.5)
Currency translation0.4
 0.1
Benefits paid(24.8) (25.1)
Other(0.1) 
End of year$366.3
 $340.0
Accrued benefit cost at end of year:   
Unfunded status$(14.2) $(63.1)
Recognized on balance sheet:   
Other noncurrent assets$1.1
 $1.0
Other current liabilities(1.1) (1.2)
Other noncurrent liabilities(14.2) (62.9)
 $(14.2) $(63.1)
Recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax:   
Prior year service cost$
 $
Net actuarial loss93.4
 110.8
 $93.4
 $110.8

F- 20

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


 202020192018
Weighted average used to determine benefit obligations:
Discount rate2.84 %3.26 %4.37 %
Weighted average used to determine net periodic cost:
Discount rate3.26 %4.37 %3.88 %
Expected return on plan assets5.00 %4.93 %4.68 %
The discount rates for determining the present value of pension obligations were selected using a “bond settlement” approach, which constructs a hypothetical bond portfolio that could be purchased such that the coupon payments and maturity values could be used to satisfy the projected benefit payments.  The discount rate is the equivalent rate that results in the present value of the projected benefit payments equaling the market value of this bond portfolio. Only high quality (AA graded or higher), non-callable corporate bonds are included in this bond portfolio.  We rely on the Pension Plans’ actuaries to assist in the development of the discount rate model. The actuarial loss in 2016 was primarily due to the decrease in the discount rate at September 30, 2016 compared to September 30, 2015.
Management’sThe expected returns on plan assets were determined with the assistance of the Pension Plans’ actuaries and investment consultants. Expected returns on plan assets were developed using forward looking returns over a time horizon of 10 to 15 years for major asset classes along with projected risk and historical correlations.
A summary
F- 22

Table of key assumptionsContents
Index to Financial Statements

Amounts recognized for Pension Plans are presented below.
 20202019
 (in millions)
Projected benefit obligations:
Beginning of year$356.6 $333.4 
Service cost1.5 1.6 
Interest cost11.2 13.9 
Actuarial gain13.7 38.2 
Benefits paid(23.5)(23.9)
Currency translation(0.1)
Decrease in obligation due to curtailment / settlement(6.5)
End of year$359.5 $356.6 
Accumulated benefit obligations at end of year$359.5 $356.6 
Plan assets:
Beginning of year$351.6 $343.5 
Actual return on plan assets32.2 38.6 
Employer contributions0.1 0.6 
Currency translation(0.5)
Benefits paid(23.5)(23.9)
Settlements(6.5)
Other(0.2)
End of year$360.4 $351.6 
Accrued benefit cost at end of year:
Funded (unfunded) status$0.9 $(5.0)
Recognized on balance sheet:
Other noncurrent assets$0.9 $
Other noncurrent liabilities(5.0)
$0.9 $(5.0)
Recognized in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax:
Net actuarial loss74.0 78.4 
$74.0 $78.4 
The components of net periodic benefit cost for our pension plansPension Plans are presented below.
 202020192018
 (in millions)
Service cost$1.5 $1.6 $1.8 
Components of net periodic cost (benefit) excluded from operating income:
Interest cost11.2 13.9 14.3 
Expected return on plan assets(16.9)(16.2)(16.5)
Amortization of actuarial net loss2.8 1.9 3.2 
Pension settlement0.7 
Other(0.1)0.1 
Pension costs (benefit) other than service(3.0)0.4 1.0 
Net periodic benefit cost (benefit)$(1.5)$2.0 $2.8 
F- 23

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Plan activity in accumulated other comprehensive loss, before tax, in 2020 is below.presented below, in millions.
Balance at beginning of year$78.4 
Actuarial gain(1.6)
Prior year actuarial loss amortization to net periodic cost(2.8)
Balance at end of year$74.0 
 Pension Plans
 2017 2016 2015
Weighted average used to determine benefit obligations:     
Discount rate3.88% 3.68% 4.84%
Weighted average used to determine net periodic cost:     
Discount rate3.68% 3.92% 4.49%
Expected return on plan assets5.16
 5.50
 6.21
We amortize amounts in accumulated other comprehensive loss representing unrecognized prior year service cost and unrecognized loss related to the Pension Plans over the weighted average life expectancy of their inactive participants. Actuarial gains and losses are amortized using a corridor approach. The gain/loss corridor is equal to ten percent of the greater of the benefit obligation and the market-related value of assets.  Gains and losses in excess of the corridor are generally amortized over the average remaining lifetime of the plan participants.
We expect to amortize $2.5 million of unrecognized loss into net periodic benefit cost from accumulated other comprehensive loss in 2021.
We maintain a single trust to holdthat holds the assets of the U.S. pension plan. Throughout 2015 and most of 2016, the strategic asset allocation was about 40% equity investments.Plan. Near the end of 2016,2020, we directed our investment manager to adjust the asset allocation from about 20% equity investments to about 30% equity investments. Near the end of 2017, we directed our investment manager to adjust the asset allocation to about 20% equity investments. investments in 2021.
This trust’s strategic asset allocations, tactical range at September 30, 20172020 and actual asset allocations are presented below.
 Strategic asset allocation      Actual asset allocations at
       September 30,
 Tactical range 2017 2016 2015
Equity investments:            
Large capitalization stocks12% 
         
Small capitalization stocks3
 
         
International stocks5
 
         
 20
 15-20%  21% 29% 39%
Fixed income investments80
 
 80
  78
 69
 60
Cash
 0-5
  1
 2
 1
 100%      100% 100% 100%
Strategic asset allocationActual asset allocations at
 September 30,
 Tactical range202020192018
Fixed income investments80 %75 -80 %78 %79 %77 %
Equity investments20 15 -20 %21 19 21 
Cash-%
100 %100 %100 %100 %
Assets of the Pension PlansPlan are allocated to various investments to attain diversification and reasonable risk-adjusted returns while also managing the exposure to asset and liability volatility. These ranges are targets and deviations may occur from time to time due to market fluctuations. Portfolio assets are typically rebalanced to the allocation targets at least annually.

F- 21

TableThe assets of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


the Plan are primarily invested in investment trusts valued at net asset value, which in turn hold fixed income and equity investments. The valuation methodologies used to measure the assets of the Pension PlansPlan at fair value are:
Equity investments are valued at the closing price reported on the active market when reliable market quotations are readily available. When market quotations are not readily available, assets of the Pension Plans are valued by a method the trustees of the Pension Plans believe accurately reflects fair value;
Fixed income fund investments held by the investment trusts are valued using the closing price reported in the active market in which the investment is traded or based on yields currently available on comparable securities of issuers with similar credit ratings; and
OtherEquity investments held by the investment trusts are valued as determinedusing the closing price reported on the active market when reliable market quotations are readily available. When market quotations are not readily available, these assets are valued by a method the trustees believe accurately reflects fair value; and
Mutual funds are valued at the closing price reported on the active market.
F- 24

Table of the Pension Plans based on their net asset values and supported by the value of the underlying securities and by the unit prices of actual purchase and sale transactions occurring at or closeContents
Index to the financial statement date.Financial Statements

The assets of the Pension PlansPlan by level within the fair value hierarchy are presented below.
September 30, 2020
Level 1Level 2Total
 (in millions)
Fixed income$$280.3 $280.3 
Equity:
Large cap index funds32.8 32.8 
   Mid cap index funds13.5 13.5 
  Small cap growth funds12.7 12.7 
International stocks:
Mutual funds7.4 7.4 
International funds10.4 10.4 
      Total equity7.4 69.4 76.8 
Cash and cash equivalents3.3 3.3 
$10.7 $349.7 $360.4 
 September 30, 2017
 Level 1 Level 2 Total
 (in millions)
Equity:     
Large cap stocks:     
Large cap growth funds$
 $32.6
 $32.6
Mid cap stocks:     
   Mid cap index funds
 10.9
 10.9
Small cap stocks:     
  Small cap growth funds
 11.3
 11.3
International stocks:     
Mutual funds15.4
 
 15.4
International funds
 7.4
 7.4
      Total equity15.4
 62.2
 77.6
Fixed income
 284.4
 284.4
Cash and cash equivalents4.3
 
 4.3
 $19.7
 $346.6
 $366.3

September 30, 2019
Level 1Level 2Total
 (in millions)
Fixed income$$277.8 $277.8 
Equity:
Large cap index funds29.8 29.8 
  Mid cap index funds9.8 9.8 
Small cap growth funds9.6 9.6 
International stocks:
Mutual funds6.9 6.9 
International funds10.3 10.3 
Total equity6.9 59.5 66.4 
Cash and cash equivalents7.4 7.4 
$14.3 $337.3 $351.6 
 September 30, 2016
 Level 1 Level 2 Total
 (in millions)
Equity:     
Large cap stocks:     
Large cap growth funds$
 $7.3
 $7.3
Large cap index funds
 38.2
 38.2
Large cap value funds
 7.2
 7.2
Small cap stocks:     
Small cap growth funds
 15.1
 15.1
International stocks:     
Mutual funds13.5
 
 13.5
International funds
 18.1
 18.1
Total equity13.5
 85.9
 99.4
Fixed income
 233.3
 233.3
Cash and cash equivalents7.3
 
 7.3
 $20.8
 $319.2
 $340.0

F- 22

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Our estimated future pension benefit payments are presented below in millions.
2021$24.7 
202224.5 
202324.1 
202423.7 
202523.2 
2026-2030108.2 
2018$32.1
201925.4
202025.4
202125.2
202225.0
2023-2027120.1
Defined Contribution Retirement Plans-Certainof our employees participate in defined contribution 401(k) plans or similar non-U.S plans. We make matching contributions as a function of employee contributions. Matching contributions were $4.1$5.3 million,, $4.0 $5.5 million and $4.2$4.7 million during 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
F- 25

Table of Contents
Note 10.
Capital Stock
Index to Financial Statements

Note 11.Capital Stock
Common stock share activity is presented below.
Shares outstanding at September 30, 20142017159,760,671158,590,383 
Vesting of restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes541,839232,875 
Exercise of stock options506,632851,628 
Exercise of employee stock purchase plan instruments212,550150,669 
Stock repurchased under buyback program(523,851)
Shares outstanding at September 30, 2015160,497,841
Vesting of restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes
370,138
Settlement of performance-based restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes
335,99886,516 
Exercise of stock options
Stock repurchased under buyback program
270,599(2,573,475)
Exercise of employee stock purchase plan instrumentsOther218,475(6,475)
Shares outstanding at September 30, 20162018161,693,051157,332,121 
Exercise of employee stock purchase plan instruments150,174
Exercise of stock options905,834
Vesting of restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes262,488200,431 
Exercise of stock options726,636 
Exercise of employee stock purchase plan instruments167,806 
Settlement of performance-based restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes160,063109,380 
Stock repurchased under buyback program(4,581,227(1,074,234))
Shares outstanding at September 30, 20172019158,590,383
157,462,140 
Note 11.Vesting of restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes
Stock-based Compensation Plans
242,112 
Exercise of stock options534,291 
Exercise of employee stock purchase plan instruments182,971 
Settlement of performance-based restricted stock units, net of shares withheld for taxes61,610 
Stock repurchased under buyback program(418,374)
Shares outstanding at September 30, 2020158,064,750 

Note 12.    Stock-based Compensation Plans
The effect of stock-based compensation on our statements of operations including discontinued operations, is presented below.
202020192018
 (in millions, except per share data)
Decrease in operating income$7.2 $5.5 $6.4 
Decrease in net income5.0 4.3 4.0 
Decrease in earnings per basic share0.03 0.03 0.03 
Decrease in earnings per diluted share0.03 0.03 0.03 
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions, except per share data)
Decrease in operating income$8.6
 $9.1
 $7.0
Decrease in net income4.8
 5.8
 4.4
Decrease in earnings per basic share0.03
 0.04
 0.03
Decrease in earnings per diluted share0.03
 0.04
 0.03
We excluded 238,826, 867,065267,298, 106,896 and 1,165,414214,435 instruments from the calculation of diluted earnings per share for 2017, 20162020, 2019 and 2015,2018, respectively, because the effect of including them would have been antidilutive.
At September 30, 2017,2020, there was approximately $8.0$7.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to stock-based awards not yet vested. We expect to recognize this expense over a weighted average life of approximately 1.61.49 years.

F- 23

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


The Mueller Water Products, Inc. 2006 Stock Incentive Plan (“2006 Plan”) authorizes an aggregate of 20,500,000 shares of common stock that may be granted through the issuance of stock-based awards. Any awards canceled are available for reissuance. Generally, all of our employees and members of our board of directors are eligible to participate in the 2006 Plan. At September 30, 2017, 7,204,3692020, 6,575,797 shares of common stock were available for future grants of awards under the 2006 Plan. This total assumes that the maximum number of shares will be earned for awards for which the final number of shares to be earned has not yet been determined.
An award granted under the 2006 Plan vests at such times and in such installments as set by the Compensation and Human Resources Committee of the board of directors (“Comp. Committee”), but no award will be exercisable after the ten-year10-year anniversary of the date on which it is granted. Management expects some instruments will be forfeited prior to vesting. Grants to members of our board of the directors are expected to vest fully. Based on historical forfeitures, we expect grants to others to be forfeited at an annual rate of 2%.
F- 26

Index to Financial Statements

Restricted Stock Units. Depending on the specific terms of each award, restricted stock units generally vest ratably over the life of the award, usually three3 years, on each anniversary date of the original grant. Compensation expense for restricted stock units is recognized between the grant date and the vesting date (or the date on which a participant becomes Retirement-eligible, if sooner) on a straight-line basis for each tranche of each award. Fair values of restricted stock units are determined using the closing price of our common stock on the respective dates of grant.
Restricted stock unit activity under the 2006 Plan is summarized below.
Restricted stock unitsWeighted
average
grant date fair value per unit
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  (millions)  
Outstanding at September 30, 2017625,830 $11.23 0.9
Granted276,658 12.20 
Vested(342,038)10.84 $4.2 
Cancelled(78,888)11.41 
Outstanding at September 30, 2018481,562 12.14 1.0
Granted233,830 10.10 
Vested(259,107)11.75 2.6 
Cancelled(19,263)11.43 
Outstanding at September 30, 2019437,022 11.31 0.9
Granted301,979 11.55 
Vested(295,241)11.40 3.4 
Cancelled(35,254)11.48 
Outstanding at September 30, 2020408,506 11.41 0.8
 Restricted stock units 
Weighted
average
grant date fair value per unit
 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  (millions)  
Outstanding at September 30, 20141,206,761
 $5.04
 0.7  
Granted459,659
 9.70
    
Vested(793,630) 3.99
   $7.7
Cancelled
 
    
Outstanding at September 30, 2015872,790
 8.45
 0.8  
Granted360,255
 9.33
    
Vested(510,535) 7.94
   4.7
Cancelled(59,062) 8.23
    
Outstanding at September 30, 2016663,448
 9.34
 1.0  
Granted343,860
 13.05
    
Vested(359,797) 9.34
   4.7
Cancelled(21,681) 13.26
    
Outstanding at September 30, 2017625,830
 $11.23
 0.9  
Performance Shares. Performance-basedPerformance-Based Awards. Our performance-based awards consist of performance-based restricted stock units (“PRSUs”). PRSUs represent a target number of units that may be paid out at the end of a multi-year award cycle consisting of annual performance periods coinciding with our fiscal years. As determined at the date of award, PRSUs may settle in cash-value equivalent of, or directly in, shares of our common stock. Settlement will range from zero0 to two2 times the number of PRSUs granted, depending on our financial performance against predetermined targets. The Compensation and Human Resourcesgrant date for each year’s performance period is set when the Comp. Committee of our board of directors (“Committee”) establishes performance goals for the period, normally within 90 days of the beginning of each performance period, with such date referred to as the “grant date”.period. At the end of each annual performance period, the Comp. Committee confirms performance against the applicable performance targets. PRSUs do not convey voting rights or earn dividends. PRSUs vest on the last day of an award cycle, unless vested sooner due to a “Change of Control” of the Company, or the death, disability or Retirement of a participant.

F- 24

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


We recognize compensation expense for stock-settled PRSUs starting on the first day of the applicable performance period and ending on the respective vesting dates. We base the recognized compensation expense upon the number of units awarded for each performance period, the closing price of our common stock on the grant date and the estimated performance factor. In 20172020 and 2016, we issued 263,4102019, 93,647 shares and 542,212181,065 shares, respectively, vested related to settle PRSUs.
F- 27

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Stock-settled PRSUs activity under the 2006 Plan is summarized below.
Award dateSettlement yearPerformance periodGrant date per unit fair valueUnits
awarded
Units forfeitedNet unitsPerformance factorShares
earned
December 1, 201520192016$9.38 77,823 (3,998)73,825 1.02175,375 
201713.26 77,824 (3,997)73,827 1.00073,827 
201812.50 77,824 (61,841)15,983 1.35721,689 
November 29, 20162020201713.26 59,285 (5,279)54,006 1.00054,006 
201812.50 59,286 (39,910)19,376 1.35726,294 
201910.53 59,290 (39,909)19,381 0.64512,501 
January 23, 20172020201713.15 19,012 19,012 1.00019,012 
201812.50 19,011 19,011 1.35725,798 
201910.53 19,011 19,011 0.64512,263 
November 28, 20172021201812.50 57,092 57,092 1.35777,474 
201910.53 57,092 (4,793)52,299 0.64533,733 
202011.26 57,104 (21,679)35,425 0.90932,202 
November 27, 20182022201910.53 110,954 (8,751)102,203 0.64565,921 
202011.26 110,954 (13,182)97,772 0.90988,875 
2021110,967 (26,484)84,483 
December 3, 20192023202011.26 69,988 (2,747)67,241 0.90961,123 
202169,989 (9,970)60,019 
202269,989 (9,970)60,019 
Award date Settlement year Performance period Grant date per unit fair value 
Units
awarded
 Units forfeited Net units Performance factor 
Shares
earned
November 27, 2012 2016 2013 $5.22
 135,553
 
 135,553
 2.000 271,106
    2014 $8.52
 135,553
 
 135,553
 2.000 271,106
    2015 $9.78
 135,552
 
 135,552
 0.000 
December 3, 2013 2017 2014 $8.52
 90,841
 (4,401) 86,440
 2.000 172,880
    2015 $9.78
 90,841
 (4,401) 86,440
 0.000 
    2016 $9.38
 90,849
 (7,402) 83,447
 1.021 85,195
December 2, 2014 2018 2015 $9.78
 80,233
 (3,835) 76,398
 0.000 
    2016 $9.38
 80,229
 (6,447) 73,782
 1.021 75,327
    2017 $13.26
 80,229
 (11,673) 68,556
 1.000 68,556
December 1, 2015 2019 2016 $9.38
 77,823
 (3,998) 73,825
 1.021 75,375
    2017 $13.26
 77,824
 (3,997) 73,827
 1.000 73,827
    2018   77,824
 (6,752) 71,072
    
November 29, 2016 2020 2017 $13.26
 59,285
 (5,279) 54,006
 1.000 54,006
    2018   59,286
 (7,227) 52,059
    
    2019   59,290
 (7,227) 52,063
    
January 23, 2017 2020 2017 $13.15
 19,012
 
 19,012
 1.000 19,012
    2018   19,011
 
 19,011
    
    2019   19,011
 
 19,011
    
Market-Based Awards. Our market-based awards consist of market-based restricted stock units (“MRSUs”). MRSUs represent a target number of units that may be paid out at the end of a three-fiscal year award cycle based on a calculation of our relative total shareholder return (“TSR”) performance as compared with the TSRs of a selected peer group. Settlements in our common shares, will range from zero to two times the number of MRSUs granted, depending on our TSR performance ranking within the peer group. The fair values of MRSUs are fixed at the date of grant and the related expense is recognized ratably over the vesting period, which is roughly three years from the date of grant.
The table below provides information regarding MRSU awards, which were valued using Monte Carlo simulations on the dates the units were granted.
December 3, 2019January 28, 2020February 24, 2020
Fair value at grant date$14.94 $16.76 $18.17 
Units granted147,213 2,763 7,498 
Variables used in determining grant date fair value:
Dividend yield1.87 %1.76 %1.73 %
Risk-free rate1.53 %1.44 %1.23 %
Expected term (in years)2.832.672.60
Stock Options. Stock options generally vest ratably over three3 years on each anniversary date of the original grant. Stock options granted since November 2007 also vest upon the Retirement of a participant. Compensation expense for stock options is recognized between the grant date and the vesting date (or the date on which a participant becomes Retirement-eligible, if sooner) on a straight-line basis for each tranche of each award. No stock options were granted in 2017 or 2016. since 2015.
F- 28

Index to Financial Statements

Stock option activity under the 2006 Plan is summarized below.
 Options   
Weighted
average
exercise
price
  per option  
 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  (millions)  
Outstanding at September 30, 20144,552,235
 $6.37
 5.0 $13.6
Granted97,119
 9.97
    
Exercised(506,632) 3.42
   3.2
Cancelled(150,056) 13.90
    
Outstanding at September 30, 20153,992,666
 6.54
 4.2 9.3
Exercised(270,599) 6.83
   0.8
Cancelled(167,759) 17.82
    
Outstanding at September 30, 20163,554,308
 5.99
 3.4 23.8
Exercised905,834
 4.71
   7.3
Cancelled(207,820) 14.72
    
Outstanding at September 30, 20172,440,654
 $5.72
 2.5 $17.3
        
Exercisable at September 30, 20172,415,475
 $5.67
 2.5 $17.2
        
Expected to vest after September 30, 201725,179
 $9.97
 7.3 $0.1

F- 25

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


OptionsWeighted
average
exercise
price
per option
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(millions)  
Outstanding at September 30, 20172,440,654 $5.72 2.5$17.3 
Exercised(851,628)7.00 3.8 
Cancelled
Outstanding at September 30, 20181,589,026 5.03 1.910.3 
Exercised(726,636)5.20 4.4 
Cancelled
Outstanding at September 30, 2019862,390 4.89 2.05.5 
Exercised(534,291)4.15 3.3 
Cancelled
Outstanding at September 30, 2020328,099 $6.11 2.3$1.4 
Exercisable at September 30, 2020328,099 $6.11 2.3$1.4 
Stock option exercise prices are equal to the closing price of our common stock on the relevant grant date.
The ranges of exercise prices for stock options outstanding at September 30, 20172020 are summarized below.
Exercise priceOptionsWeighted
average
exercise price
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
Exercisable optionsWeighted
average
exercise price
$0.00 -$4.99 129,949 $3.19 0.8129,949 $3.19 
$5.00 -$9.99 198,150 8.02 3.3198,150 8.02 
328,099 $6.11 2.3328,099 $6.11 
Exercise price Options 
Weighted
average
exercise price
 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 Exercisable options 
Weighted
average
exercise price
 $0.00
-$4.99
  804,173
 $3.29
 3.4 804,173
 $3.29
 $5.00
-$9.99
  1,330,050
 6.05
 2.5 1,304,871
 5.97
 $10.00
-$14.99
  306,431
 10.66
 0.2 306,431
 10.66
      2,440,654
 $5.72
 2.5 2,415,475
 $5.67
Compensation expense attributed to stock options is based on the fair value of the awards on their respective grant dates, as determined using a Black-Scholes model. The weighted average grant-date fair values of stock options granted in 2015 and the weighted average assumptions used to determine these fair values are indicated below.
Grant-date fair value$5.93
Risk-free interest rate1.74%
Dividend yield0.80%
Expected life (years)8.0
Expected annual volatility0.6199
The risk-free interest rate is based on the U.S. Treasury zero-coupon yield in effect at the grant date with a term equal to the expected life. The expected dividend yield is based on our estimated annual dividend and stock price history at the grant date. The expected term represents the period of time the awards are expected to be outstanding.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The Mueller Water Products, Inc. 2006 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) authorizes the sale of up to 5,800,000 shares of our common stock to employees. Generally, all full-time, active employees are eligible to participate in the ESPP, subject to certain restrictions. Employee purchases are funded through payroll deductions, and any excess payroll withholdings are returned to the employee. The price for shares purchased under the ESPP is 85% of the lower of the closing price on the first day or the last day of the offering period. At September 30, 2017, 2,901,6042020, 2,400,158 shares were available for issuance under the ESPP.

F- 26

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Phantom Plan. Under the Mueller Water Products, Inc. Phantom Plan we adopted in 2012 (“Phantom Plan”), we have awarded “phantom units” to certain non-officer employees. A phantom unit settles in cash equal to the price of one share of our common stock on the vesting date. Phantom units vest ratably over three3 years on each anniversary date of the original grant. We recognize compensation expense for phantom units on a straight-line basis for each tranche of each award based on the closing price of our common stock at each balance sheet date. The outstanding phantom units had a fair value of $12.80$10.39 per unit at September 30, 20172020 and our accrued liability for such units was $3.0 million. $2.2 million.
F- 29

Index to Financial Statements

Phantom Plan activity is summarized below.
Phantom
Plan units  
Weighted
average
grant date
fair value
  per unit  
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  (millions)  
Outstanding at September 30, 2017352,007 $11.36 0.9
Granted163,199 12.40 
Vested(170,675)$2.1 
Cancelled(81,758)12.10 
Outstanding at September 30, 2018262,773 12.12 0.6
Granted180,747 10.53 
Vested(132,289)1.4 
Cancelled(55,077)11.61 
Outstanding at September 30, 2019256,154 11.39 0.9
Granted188,973 11.26 
Vested(118,908)1.3 
Cancelled(11,744)11.23 
Outstanding at September 30, 2020314,475 11.16 0.9
 Phantom Plan units   
Weighted
average
grant date
fair value
  per unit  
 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
  (millions)  
Outstanding at September 30, 2014643,288
 $6.22
 0.8  
Granted289,524
 9.78
    
Vested(317,409)     $3.1
Cancelled(56,525) 8.29
    
Outstanding at September 30, 2015558,878
 8.49
 0.8  
Granted302,875
 9.84
    
Vested(270,822)     2.5
Cancelled(56,905) 9.28
    
Outstanding at September 30, 2016534,026
 9.60
 0.9  
Granted199,260
 13.22
    
Vested(278,000)     3.7
Cancelled(103,279) 10.87
    
Outstanding at September 30, 2017352,007
 $11.36
 0.9  


F- 2730

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Note 13.Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
Note 12.
Supplemental Balance Sheet Information
Selected supplemental balance sheetasset information is presented below.
 September 30,
 20202019
 (in millions)
Inventories:
Purchased components and raw material$87.3 $95.2 
Work in process32.4 43.7 
Finished goods42.8 52.5 
$162.5 $191.4 
Other current assets:
Prepaid expenses$10.9 $9.6 
Non-trade receivables8.5 6.3 
Income taxes5.5 4.7 
Maintenance and repair tooling3.7 4.2 
Other0.4 1.2 
$29.0 $26.0 
Property, plant and equipment:
Land$6.2 $5.2 
Buildings80.4 68.9 
Machinery and equipment406.3 362.9 
Construction in progress57.4 48.0 
$550.3 $485.0 
Accumulated depreciation(296.5)(267.9)
$253.8 $217.1 
Other noncurrent assets:
Operating lease right of use asset$25.6 $
Maintenance and repair supplies and tooling17.5 16.4 
Workers compensation reimbursement receivable2.1 3.1 
Note receivable1.8 1.8 
Pension asset0.9 
Other3.4 2.6 
$51.3 $23.9 

F- 31

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

 September 30,
 2017 2016
 (in millions)
Inventories:   
Purchased components and raw material$67.7
 $67.0
Work in process35.6
 31.4
Finished goods35.6
 32.3
 $138.9
 $130.7
Other current assets:   
Maintenance and repair tooling$3.3
 $2.9
Income taxes10.9
 1.5
Other10.2
 8.3
 $24.4
 $12.7
Property, plant and equipment:   
Land$5.6
 $5.7
Buildings53.4
 50.6
Machinery and equipment266.7
 248.3
Construction in progress24.7
 14.8
 $350.4
 $319.4
Accumulated depreciation(228.1) (211.0)
 $122.3
 $108.4
Other current liabilities:   
Compensation and benefits$26.9
 $32.7
Customer rebates6.5
 8.3
Taxes other than income taxes3.2
 3.0
Warranty3.5
 2.0
Environmental1.3
 5.0
Income taxes0.9
 4.6
Interest0.6
 0.5
Restructuring3.3
 
Other7.3
 5.6
 $53.5
 $61.7
Selected supplemental liability information is presented below.
 September 30,
 20202019
 (in millions)
Other current liabilities:
Compensation and benefits$35.5 $28.5 
Customer rebates9.6 8.7 
Interest7.3 7.3 
Warranty7.2 6.5 
Deferred revenues5.6 4.7 
Refund liability4.3 3.3 
Operating lease liabilities4.0 
Taxes other than income taxes3.9 3.3 
Restructuring and severance2.8 1.7 
Environmental1.2 1.2 
Income taxes0.2 0.6 
Accrued settlements0.2 0.2 
Walter tax liability22.0 
Other4.8 5.0 
$86.6 $93.0 
Other noncurrent liabilities:
Operating lease liabilities$23.3 $
Warranty7.2 10.7 
Transition tax5.2 5.8 
Unrecognized income tax benefits4.5 3.3 
Workers compensation3.8 1.9 
Asset retirement obligation3.5 3.6 
CARES Act deferred tax liabilities3.3 
Deferred development grant2.5 
Pension5.0 
Other3.0 2.9 
$56.3 $33.2 
Note 13.
Supplemental Statement of Operations Information
CARES Act
On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (“CARES Act”) was signed into law. The CARES Act is a relief package intended to assist in many aspects of the American economy through direct secured loans and deferrals of the employer portion of social security taxes through the end of calendar year 2020, with 50% of the deferral due December 31, 2021 and the remainder due December 31, 2022. For the fiscal year ended, September 7, 2017,30, 2020, we have elected these tax deferrals, which are approximately $3.3 million as shown above.
Note 14.Supplemental Statement of Operations Information
During October 2018, we announced a strategic reorganization plan designedthe move of our Middleborough, Massachusetts facility to Atlanta, which will allow us to consolidate our resources and accelerate our product innovation through creation of a research and revenue growth.development center of excellence for software and electronics in Atlanta, Georgia. We have adopted a matrix management structure, where business teams have lineincurred expenses of $0.5 million and cross-functional responsibility for managing distinct product portfolios$4.3 million as of September 30, 2020 and engineering, operations, sales & marketing and other functions2019, respectively, related to this reorganization, which are centralized to better align with business needs and generate greater efficiencies. We recorded $4.2 millionincluded in other charges, primarily for severanceand it was essentially completed in 2020.
F- 32

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

During November 2019, we announced the purchase of a new facility in Kimball, Tennessee, which will allow us to support and enhance our investment in our Chattanooga large casting foundry. As a result of this reorganization, we announced the subsequent closures of our facilities in Hammond, Indiana and Woodland, Washington. We have incurred expenses of $2.5 million related to this strategic reorganization plan,in fiscal 2020, which is included in other charges.
On February 15, 2019, we experienced a mass shooting tragedy at our Henry Pratt facility in Aurora, Illinois. The event resulted in the deaths of which $3.3 million is accrued atfive employees and injuries to one employee and six law enforcement officials. For the years ended September 30, 2017.
During the quarter ended June2020 and September 30, 2016,2019, we initiated certain demolitionincurred expenses of $0.9 million and $5.1 million, respectively, related activities for our Statesboro, Georgia property, some of the costs ofto this tragedy, which are indemnified by Tyco as explainedincluded in Note 17. Corporate recorded a receivable from Tyco for our estimated recovery under the indemnification and aother charges. These amounts are net charge of $4.1 million under the caption other charges in 2016.

F- 28

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


anticipated insurance recoveries.
Selected supplemental statement of operations information is presented below.
202020192018
(in millions)
Included in selling, general and administrative expenses:
Research and development$15.0 $14.3 $11.6 
Advertising3.3 7.1 7.1 
Interest expense, net:
5.5% Senior Notes$24.8 $24.8 $7.5 
Deferred financing costs amortization1.2 1.2 1.6 
ABL Agreement0.6 0.6 0.6 
Interest rate swap contracts0.6 
Term Loan14.4 
   Capitalized interest(0.3)(3.0)
Other interest expense0.3 (0.2)0.6 
26.6 23.3 25.3 
Interest income(1.1)(3.5)(4.4)
$25.5 $19.8 $20.9 

Note 15.Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Included in selling, general and administrative expenses:     
Research and development$12.1
 $9.9
 $12.1
Advertising$5.2
 $4.0
 $4.0
Interest expense, net:     
Term Loan$19.1
 $20.5
 $17.5
Deferred financing costs amortization1.8
 1.9
 2.0
ABL Agreement0.8
 1.1
 1.7
Interest rate swap contracts1.9
 
 
7.375% Senior Subordinated Notes
 
 4.0
8.75% Senior Unsecured Notes
 
 2.4
Other interest expense0.6
 0.5
 0.2
 24.2
 24.0
 27.8
Interest income(2.0) (0.4) (0.3)
 $22.2
 $23.6
 $27.5
Note 14.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss is presented below.
Foreign currency translationPension liability, net of taxTotal
(in millions)
Balance at September 30, 2019$$(36.0)$(36.0)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications8.0 1.2 9.2 
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss2.1 2.1 
Other comprehensive income8.0 3.3 11.3 
Balance at September 30, 2020$8.0 $(32.7)$(24.7)

Note 16.Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 Foreign currency translation Minimum pension liability, net of tax Derivative instruments, net of tax Total
 (in millions)
Balance at September 30, 2016$(6.1) $(57.7) $(4.5) $(68.3)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications2.8
 8.3
 3.0
  
Amounts reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive loss
 2.4
 
  
Other comprehensive income2.8
 10.7
 3.0
 16.5
Balance at September 30, 2017$(3.3) $(47.0) $(1.5) $(51.8)
Note 15.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Supplemental cash flow information is presented below.
202020192018
 (in millions)
Cash paid, net:
Interest$24.3 $22.2 $8.9 
Income taxes$15.3 $29.1 $10.7 
 September 30,
 2017 2016 2015
 (in millions)
Cash paid, net:     
Interest$19.5
 $21.1
 $36.8
Income taxes$31.9
 $27.1
 $3.7


F- 2933

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Note 17.    Segment Information
Note 16.
Segment Information
Our operations consist of two business2 reportable segments: Infrastructure (previously referred to as “Mueller Co.”) and Technologies (previously referred to as “Mueller Technologies”).Technologies. These segments are organized primarily based on products sold and customers served and are consistent with how the segments are managed, how resources are allocated and how information is used by the chief operating decision maker. Infrastructure manufactures valves for water and gas systems including butterfly, iron gate, tapping, check, knife, plug, automatic control and ball valves and dry-barrel and wet-barrel fire hydrants.hydrants and pipe repair products. Technologies offers metering, leak detection, pipe condition assessment and other products and services for the water infrastructure industry.
Segment results are not reflective of their results on a stand-alone basis. Intersegment sales and transfers are made at selling prices generally intended to cover costs. Infrastructure personnel provide certain administrative services, including management of accounts payable and accounts receivable, without any allocation of cost to Technologies. We do not believe the costs of such administrative services are material to the segments’ results. The determination of segment results excludes certain corporate expenses designated as Corporate because they are not directly attributable to segment operations. Interest expense, loss on early extinguishment of debt and income taxes are not allocated to the segments. Corporate expenses include those costs incurred by our corporate function, such as accounting, treasury, risk management, human resources, legal, tax and other administrative functions and also costs associated with assets and liabilities retained following the sales of U.S. Pipe and Anvil. Corporate assets principally consist of our cash, Anviloperating lease assets, held for sale at September 30, 2016 and certain real property previously owned by U.S. Pipe.Pipe and Anvil. Business segment assets consist primarily of receivables, inventories, property, plant and equipment, intangible assets and other noncurrent assets.
Our largest customers are Ferguson and Core & Main. Information regarding concentrations of our net sales and accounts receivable is presented below.
202020192018
Percentage of gross revenue:
10 largest customers53 %53 %54 %
2 largest customers34 %34 %34 %
Ferguson percentage of gross revenue:
   Consolidated17 %18 %19 %
   Infrastructure16 %17 %18 %
   Technologies22 %30 %28 %
Core & Main percentage of gross revenue:
   Consolidated17 %16 %15 %
   Infrastructure19 %18 %17 %

September 30,
20202019
(in millions)
Customer receivables:
Core & Main$37.1 $31.9 
Ferguson26.1 25.8 
F- 34

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Geographical area information is presented below.
United StatesIsraelOtherTotal
 (in millions)
Property, plant and equipment, net:
September 30, 2020$234.7 $12.8 $6.3 $253.8 
September 30, 2019201.3 9.7 6.1 217.1 
 United States Canada     Other     Total    
 (in millions)
Net sales:       
2017$732.0
 $62.3
 $31.7
 $826.0
2016716.5
 57.1
 27.0
 800.6
2015700.9
 62.2
 30.3
 793.4
Property, plant and equipment, net:       
September 30, 2017$116.1
 $3.0
 $3.2
 $122.3
September 30, 2016103.3
 2.1
 3.0
 108.4

Approximately 53% of our 2017 gross sales were to our 10 largest customers, and approximately 34% of our 2017 gross sales were to our two largest customers, Ferguson Enterprises, Inc. (“Ferguson Enterprises”) and HD Supply, Inc. (“HD Supply”). Sales to Ferguson Enterprises comprised approximately 18%, 17% and 15% of our total gross sales during 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. In 2017, Ferguson Enterprises accounted for approximately 17% and 24% of gross sales for Infrastructure and Technologies, respectively. Receivables from Ferguson Enterprises totaled $20.0 million and $21.9 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Sales to Core & Main (formerly known as HD Supply Waterworks) comprised approximately 16%, 16% and 16% of our total gross sales during 2017, 2016, and 2015, respectively. In 2017, Core & Main accounted for approximately 17% of gross sales for Infrastructure. Receivables from HD Supply totaled $27.3 million and $23.8 million at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Year ended
September 30,
20202019
(in millions)
Infrastructure disaggregated net revenues:
Central$222.2 $214.2 
Northeast187.5 183.1 
Southeast162.3 162.7 
West216.9 212.8 
United States$788.9 $772.8 
Canada65.5 69.0 
Other international locations31.1 29.2 
$885.5 $871.0 
Technologies disaggregated net revenues:
Central$18.7 $27.8 
Northeast19.7 20.4 
Southeast22.1 33.5 
West13.6 10.3 
United States$74.1 $92.0 
Canada and other international locations4.5 5.0 
$78.6 $97.0 

F- 3035

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Summarized financial information for our segments is presented below.
InfrastructureTechnologiesCorporateTotal
 (in millions)
Net revenue:
2020$885.5 $78.6 $$964.1 
2019871.0 97.0 968.0 
2018818.8 97.2 916.0 
Operating income (loss):
2020$186.7 $(13.1)$(56.8)$116.8 
2019182.3 (8.7)(49.3)124.3 
2018180.1 (24.4)(34.0)121.7 
Depreciation and amortization:
2020$49.1 $8.5 $0.2 $57.8 
201944.8 7.9 0.3 53.0 
201837.4 6.1 0.2 43.7 
Other charges:
2020$0.6 $0.1 $12.3 $13.0 
20191.7 14.6 16.3 
20180.1 0.1 10.3 10.5 
Capital expenditures:
2020$64.5 $2.8 $0.4 $67.7 
201980.4 5.5 0.7 86.6 
201847.3 8.3 0.1 55.7 
Total assets:
September 30, 2020$1,149.8 $93.2 $152.0 $1,395.0 
September 30, 20191,107.8 100.3 129.2 1,337.3 
Intangible assets, net:
September 30, 2020$490.8 $17.9 $$508.7 
September 30, 2019508.2 21.2 529.4 

 Infrastructure Technologies Corporate   Total    
 (in millions)
Net sales, excluding intercompany:       
2017$739.9
 $86.1
 $
 $826.0
2016715.7
 84.9
 
 800.6
2015702.2
 91.2
 
 793.4
Intercompany sales:       
2017$1.1
 $
 $
 $1.1
20165.8
 
 
 5.8
20157.2
 
 
 7.2
Operating income (loss):       
2017$163.4
 $(20.3) $(42.4) $100.7
2016159.3
 (11.1) (55.3) 92.9
2015136.9
 (12.9) (44.4) 79.6
Depreciation and amortization:       
2017$36.3
 $5.2
 $0.4
 $41.9
201634.2
 4.8
 0.5
 39.5
201538.8
 4.2
 0.4
 43.4
Total pension settlement, loss on Walter receivable and other charges:       
2017$2.7
 $0.7
 $7.0
 $10.4
20163.0
 0.9
 19.9
 23.8
20158.4
 0.1
 11.5
 20.0
Capital expenditures:       
2017$28.5
 $11.4
 $0.7
 $40.6
201624.3
 7.0
 0.2
 31.5
201520.5
 6.5
 0.2
 27.2
Total assets:       
September 30, 2017$792.6
 $88.4
 $377.3
 $1,258.3
September 30, 2016750.4
 86.1
 444.1
 1,280.6
Intangible assets, net:       
September 30, 2017$417.2
 $22.1
 $
 $439.3
September 30, 2016416.9
 17.7
 
 434.6
Note 17.18.Commitments and Contingencies
We are involved in various legal proceedings that have arisen in the normal course of operations, including the proceedings summarized below. The effect of the outcome of these matters on our financial statements cannot be predicted with certainty as any such effect depends on the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters.matters and potential insurance coverage. Other than the litigation described below, we do not believe that any of our outstanding litigation would have a material adverse effect on our business or prospects.
Environmental. We are subject to a wide variety of laws and regulations concerning the protection of the environment, both with respect to the operations at many of our properties and with respect to remediating environmental conditions that may exist at our own or other properties. We accrue for environmental expenses resulting from existing conditions that relate to past operations when the costs are probable and reasonably estimable.
In the acquisition agreement pursuant to which a predecessor to Tyco sold our businesses to a previous owner in August 1999, Tyco agreed to indemnify us and our affiliates, among other things, for all “Excluded Liabilities.” Excluded Liabilities include, among other things, substantially all liabilities relating to the time prior to August 1999, including environmental liabilities. The indemnity survives indefinitely. Tyco’s indemnity does not cover liabilities to the extent caused by us or the operation of our businesses after August 1999, nor does it cover liabilities arising with respect to businesses or sites acquired after August 1999. Since 2007, Tyco has engaged in multiple corporate restructurings, split-offs and divestitures.

F- 31

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


While none of these transactions directly affects the indemnification obligations of the Tyco indemnitors under the 1999 acquisition agreement, the result of such transactions is that the assets of, and control over, such Tyco indemnitors has changed. Should any of these Tyco indemnitors become financially unable or fail to comply with the terms of the indemnity, we may be responsible for such obligations or liabilities.
In September 1987, we implemented an Administrative Consent Order (“ACO”) for our Burlington, New Jersey property, which was required under the New Jersey Environmental Cleanup Responsibility Act (now known as the Industrial Site Recovery Act). The ACO required soil and ground-water cleanup, and we completed, and received final approval on, the soil cleanup required by the ACO. We retained this property related
F- 36

Table of Contents
Index to the sale of U.S. Pipe. We expect ground-water issues as well as issues associated with the demolition of former manufacturing facilities at this site will continue and remediation by us could be required. Long-term ground-water monitoring may also be required, but we do not know how long such monitoring would be required and do not believe monitoring or further remediation costs, if any, will have a material adverse effect on any of our financial statements.Financial Statements

On July 13, 2010, Rohcan Investments Limited, the former owner of property leased by Mueller Canada Ltd. and located in Milton, Ontario, filed suit against Mueller Canada Ltd. and its directors seeking C$10.0 million in damages arising from the defendants’ alleged environmental contamination of the property and breach of lease. Mueller Canada Ltd. leased the property from 1988 through 2008. We are pursuing indemnification from a former owner for certain potential liabilities that are alleged in this lawsuit, and we have accrued for other liabilities not covered by indemnification.  On December 7, 2011, the Court denied the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.
The purchaser of U.S. Pipe has been identified as a “potentially responsible party” (“PRP”) under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (“CERCLA”) in connection with a former manufacturing facility operated by U.S. Pipe that was in the vicinity of a proposed Superfund site located in North Birmingham, Alabama. Under the terms of the acquisition agreement relating to our sale of U.S. Pipe, we agreed to indemnify the purchaser for certain environmental liabilities, including those arising out of the former manufacturing site in North Birmingham. Accordingly, the purchaser tendered the matter to us for indemnification, which we accepted. Ultimate liability for the site will depend on many factors that have not yet been determined, including the determination of EPA’s remediation costs, the number and financial viability of the other PRPs (there are four other PRPs currently) and the determination of the final allocation of the costs among the PRPs. Accordingly, because the amount of such costs cannot be reasonably estimated at this time, no amounts had been accrued for this matter at September 30, 2017.2020.
Walter Energy. EachWe were a member of the Walter Energy, Inc (“Walter Energy”) federal tax consolidated group which included us through December 14, 2006, isat which time the Company was spun-off from Walter Energy. Until our spin-off from Walter Energy, we joined in the filing of Walter Energy’s consolidated federal income tax return for each taxable year during which we were a member of the consolidated group. As a result, we were jointly and severally liable for the federal income tax liability, of each other memberif any, of the consolidated group for any year in which it is a membereach of the group at any time during such year. Accordingly, we could be liable in the event any such federal income tax liability is incurred, and not discharged, by any other member of the Walter Energy consolidated group for any period during which we were included in the Walter Energy consolidated group.
Walter Energy effectively controlled all of our tax decisions for periods during which we were a member of the Walter Energy consolidated group for federal income tax purposes and certain combined, consolidated or unitary state and local income tax groups. Under the terms of an income tax allocation agreement between us and Walter Energy, dated May 26, 2006, we generally compute our tax liability on a stand-alone basis, but Walter Energy has sole authority to respond to and conduct all tax proceedings (including tax audits) relating to our federal income and combined state tax returns, to file all such tax returns on our behalf and to determine the amount of our liability to (or entitlement to payment from) Walter Energy for such previous periods.
According to Walter Energy's quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed with the SEC on November 5, 2015 (“Walter November 2015 Filing”), at September 30, 2015, a dispute exists with the IRS regarding federal income taxes for years 1980 to 1994 and 1999 to 2001 allegedly owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group, which included U.S. Pipe during these periods. As a matter of law, we are jointly and severally liable for any final tax determination, which means we would be liable in the event Walter Energy is unable to pay any amounts owed. According to the Walter November 2015 Filing, Walter Energy had $33.0 million of accruals for unrecognized tax benefits on the matters subject to disposition. In the Walter November 2015 Filing, Walter Energy stated that it believed that it had sufficient accruals to address any claims, including interest and penalties, and did not believe that any potential difference between the final settlements and the amounts accrued would have a material effect on Walter Energy's financial position, but such potential difference could be material to results of its operations in a future reporting period.

F- 32

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


those years. In July 2015, Walter Energy filed a petition for reorganizationbankruptcy protection under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code before the Bankruptcy Court forin the Northern District of Alabama (“Chapter 11Bankruptcy Case”). During the pendency of the Chapter 11 Case, we monitored the proceeding to determine whether we could be liable for all or a portion of this federal income tax liability if it is incurred, and not discharged, for any period during which we were included in theThe IRS alleged that Walter Energy consolidated group. Onowed substantial amounts (“Walter Tax Liability”), and on January 11, 2016, the IRS filed a proof of claim in the Chapter 11Bankruptcy Case, alleging that Walter Energy owes amounts for prior taxable periods (specifically, 1983-1994, 2000-2002owed taxes, interest and 2005)penalties in an aggregate amount of $554.3 million ($229.1 million of which the IRS claims is entitled to priority status in the Chapter 11 Case). The IRS asserts that its claim is based on an alleged settlement of Walter Energy’s tax liability for the 1983-1995 taxable periods in connection with Walter Energy’s prior bankruptcy proceeding in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Middle District of Florida.million. In the proof of claim, the IRS included an alternative calculation in the event the alleged settlement of the prior bankruptcy court is found to be non-binding, which provides for a claim by the IRS in an aggregate amount of $860.4 million.
At September 30, 2019, we had accrued a current liability of $22.0 million ($535.3in connection with this matter. On November 18, 2019, we paid $22.2 million, of whichincluding additional accrued interest, to the IRS claims is entitled to priority status in the Chapter 11 Case).
According to a current report on Form 8-K filed by Walter Energy with the SEC on April 1, 2016 (“Walter April 2016 Filing”), on March 31, 2016, Walter Energy closed on the salefinal settlement of substantially all of Walter Energy’s Alabama assets pursuant to the provisions of Sections 105, 363this tax dispute. All appeal periods have expired, and 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.  The Walter April 2016 Filing further stated that Walter Energy would have no further material business operations after April 1, 2016 and Walter Energy was evaluating its optionsour liabilities with respect to the wind downWalter Tax Liability have been fully resolved.
City of Jackson, MS v. Siemens Industry, Inc., et al.On or about August 22, 2013, Mueller Systems, LLC (“Mueller Systems”) entered into an agreement with Siemens Industries, Inc (“Siemens”) to provide advanced metering infrastructure (“AMI”) products and services to Siemens as part of Siemens’ project for the City of Jackson, MS (the “City”). This project included products and services, which were provided by parties other than Mueller Systems, for the City’s water treatment plants, sewer lines and billing system (the “Project”). On June 11, 2018, the City filed a lawsuit against Siemens and several of its remaining assets.  The asset sale did not impactcontractors (excluding Mueller Systems) for multiple claims related to the IRS’ proofProject, including claims for fraud, negligence, breach of claimimplied warranty of good workmanship, negligent representation, civil conspiracy, unjust enrichment, breach of contract and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing (“Siemens Lawsuit”). In the Siemens Lawsuit, the City alleged damages in excess of $450.0 million. On November 12, 2019, the City filed an amended complaint, adding Mueller Systems as a defendant in the Bankruptcy CaseSiemens Lawsuit.
In February 2020, the City dismissed all claims against Mueller Systems in the Siemens Lawsuit. On March 27, 2020, the City and Siemens executed a settlement agreement whereby Siemens agreed to pay the City $89.8 million (“Settlement Amount”) in order to settle the Siemens Lawsuit (the “Settlement”). Following the Settlement, Siemens sought to recover a portion of the Settlement Amount from Mueller Systems, and the proofparties entered negotiations to resolve the matter. In September 2020, we resolved the matter, paid Siemens approximately $10 million, and recovered $5.0 million from insurance.
The COVID-19 Pandemic. The pandemic has caused, and is likely to continue to cause, severe economic, market and other disruptions to the U.S. and global economies. As a result of claim, as well as the alleged tax liability thereunder, remain unresolved.pandemic, we experienced adverse business conditions during the year, including significant costs to mitigate the pandemic effects. We have taken and continue to take steps to maximize liquidity by limiting cash expenditures, including furloughing significant numbers of our employees, implementing temporary shutdowns of our manufacturing facilities or portions of our manufacturing facilities, implementing temporary salary reductions for our senior leadership team, deferral of capital expenditures, reduced fees for our Board of Directors and aggressively reducing general and administrative spending. We are uncertain of the potential full magnitude or duration of the business and economic impacts from the unprecedented public health effort to contain and combat the spread of COVID-19, and while the extent to which the pandemic affects our results will depend on future developments, the outbreak could result in material effects to our future financial position, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
F- 37

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements

Mass Shooting Event at our Henry Pratt Facility in Aurora, Illinois. On February 2, 2017,15, 2019, we experienced a mass shooting event at our Henry Pratt facility in Aurora, Illinois, in which five employees were killed and one employee and six law enforcement officers were injured. Various workers’ compensation claims arising from the request of Walter Energy, the Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Alabama signed an order converting the Chapter 11 Caseevent have been made to a liquidation proceedingdate, and we anticipate that additional claims may be made, and that liability under Chapter 7 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code, pursuant to which Walter Energy will be wound-down and liquidated (“Chapter 7 Case”). In its objection contesting such conversion, the IRS indicated its intent to pursue collection of amounts included in the Proof of Claim from former members of the Walter Energy consolidated group.
We cannot predict whether or to what extent we may become liable for the tax-related amounts of the Walter Energy consolidated group asserted in the IRS’ proof of claim filed in the Bankruptcy Case, in part, because: (i) the amounts owed by the Walter Energy consolidated group for certain of the taxable periods from 1980 through 2006 remain unresolved; (ii) it is unclear what priority,claims, if any, the IRS will receive in the Chapter 7 Case with respectis not expected to its claims against Walter Energy, and whether and to what extent funds will be available in the Chapter 7 Case to pay priority tax claims.  We also intend to vigorously assert any and all available defenses against any liability we may have as a member of the Walter Energy consolidated group.  However, we cannot currently estimate our liability, if any, relating to the tax-related liabilities of Walter Energy’s consolidated tax group for tax years prior to 2007, and such liability could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity or results of operations.operations or cash flows. However, the possibility of other legal proceedings, and any related effects, arising from this event cannot be predicted with certainty.
In accordance with the income tax allocation agreement entered into in connection with our spin-off from Walter Energy, Walter Energy used certain tax assets of one of our predecessors in its calendar 2006 tax return for which payment to us is required. The income tax allocation agreement requires, among other things, Walter Energy to make the payment upon realization of this tax benefit by receiving a refund or otherwise offsetting taxes due. Walter Energy owed us $11.6 million that was payable pending completion of an IRS audit of Walter Energy’s 2006 tax year and the related refund of tax from that year. As a result of the aforementioned Chapter 11 petition, we wrote off this receivable during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.
Indemnifications. We are a party to contracts in which it is common for us to agree to indemnify third parties for certain liabilities that arise out of or relate to the subject matter of the contract. In some cases, this indemnity extends to related liabilities arising from the negligence of the indemnified parties, but usually excludes any liabilities caused by gross negligence or willful misconduct. We cannot estimate the potential amount of future payments under these indemnities until events arise that would trigger a liability under the indemnities.
Additionally, in connection with the sale of assets and the divestiture of businesses, such as the divestitures of U.S. Pipe and Anvil, we may agree to indemnify buyers and related parties for certain losses or liabilities incurred by these parties with respect to: (i) the representations and warranties made by us to these parties in connection with the sale and (ii) liabilities related to the pre-closing operations of the assets or business sold. Indemnities related to pre-closing operations generally include certain environmental and tax liabilities and other liabilities not assumed by these parties in the transaction.

F- 33

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements


Indemnities related to the pre-closing operations of sold assets or businesses normally do not represent additional liabilities to us, but simply serve to protect these parties from potential liability associated with our obligations existing at the time of the sale. As with any liability, we have accrued for those pre-closing obligations that are considered probable and reasonably estimable. Should circumstances change, increasing the likelihood of payments related to a specific indemnity, we will accrue a liability when future payment is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable.
Other Matters. At September 30, 2016, Anvil was We monitor and analyze our warranty experience and costs periodically and may revise our warranty accruals as necessary. Critical factors in a dispute with Victaulic Company (“Victaulic”) regarding two patents held by Victaulic, U.S. Patent 7,086,131 (the “131 Patent”)our reserve analyses include warranty terms, specific claim situations, incurred and U.S. Patent 7,712,796 (the “796 Patent”projected failure rates, the nature of product failures, product and collectively with the 131 Patent, the “U.S. Patents”), which Anvil believed were invalid.  The U.S. Patents potentially related to a coupling product currently manufacturedlabor costs, and marketed by Anvil.  During the course of this dispute, Anvil filed multiple reexamination requests with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (the “PTO”) regarding the U.S. Patents, and the PTO granted the requests.  Although the PTO examiner initially invalidated most of the claims of the 796 Patent, the PTO examiner affirmed the validity of the 796 Patent in September 2014.  In April 2015, the PTO examiner invalidated the original claim of the 131 Patent but found several claims added during reexamination that appear substantially similar to those included in the 796 Patent patentable. The PTO examiners’ decisions with respect to the U.S. Patents were appealed to the Patent Trial and Appeal Board by Anvil and Victaulic. In July 2016, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board rejected as unpatentable all claims of the 131 Patent. Relatedly, at September 30, 2016, Anvil and Victaulic were also engaged in lawsuits with respect to these patent matters in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia and in the Federal Court of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. In October 2016, we entered into a settlement and license agreement with Victaulic, which amicably resolved all of these lawsuits and patent matters.general business conditions.
During 2018, our second quarter, we became awarewarranty analysis identified that some radiocertain other Technologies products produced between 2011 and 2014 and installed in particularly harsh environments werehad been failing at higher-than-expected rates, and that the average cost to repair or replace certain products under warranty was higher than previously estimated. As a higher-than-expected rate. Consequently,result, we recorded a discretean additional warranty expense of $9.8$14.1 million associated with these products in our Technologies segment. We have carefully examined our product processes and accelerated lifecycle testing data with respect to radios produced after the period referenced above and expect our future warranty experience to be in line with industry norms.such products.
We are party to a number of other lawsuits arising in the ordinary course of business, including product liability cases for products manufactured by us or third parties. We provide for costs relating to these matters when a loss is probable and the amount is reasonably estimable. Administrative costs related to these matters are expensed as incurred. The effect of the outcome of these matters on our future financial statements cannot be predicted with certainty as any such effect depends on the amount and timing of the resolution of such matters. While the results of litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, we believe that the final outcome of such other litigation is not likely to have a materiallymaterial adverse effect on our business or prospects.
Operating Leases. We maintain operating leases primarily for equipment and facilities. Rent expense was $5.9 million, $5.8 million and $5.8 million for 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Future minimum payments under non-cancellable operating leases are $3.6 million, $2.5 million, $2.3 million, $2.2 million and $1.9 million during 2018, 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Total minimum payments due beyond 2022 are $4.5 million.
Note 19.Subsequent Events
Note 18.
Subsequent Events
On October 25, 2017,23, 2020, our board of directors declared a dividend of $0.04$0.0550 per share on our common stock, a 5 percent increase from the prior quarter, payable on or about November 20, 20172020 to stockholders of record at the close of business on November 10, 2017.2020.
In November 2017, we repurchased 823,739 shares of our common stock under our buyback program for $10.0 million.

F- 3438

Table of Contents
Index to Financial Statements



Note 19.
Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Unaudited)
Note 20.Quarterly Consolidated Financial Information (Unaudited)
Quarter
Quarter FourthThirdSecondFirst
Fourth Third Second First(in millions, except per share amounts)
(in millions, except per share amounts)
2017       
20202020
Net sales$226.9
 $232.2
 $199.7
 $167.2
Net sales$265.3 $228.5 $257.7 $212.6 
Gross profit80.9
 82.5
 52.4
 51.7
Gross profit93.9 75.7 86.0 72.6 
Operating income33.3
 42.6
 10.9
 13.9
Operating income40.7 20.0 35.8 20.3 
Income from continuing operations20.1
 24.1
 4.7
 5.4
Discontinued operations(0.8) (0.1) 68.6
 1.3
Net income19.3
 24.0
 73.3
 6.7
Net income$26.7 $11.2 $23.8 $10.3 
       
Earnings per basic share(1)
       
Earnings per basic share(1)
$0.17 $0.07 $0.15 $0.07 
Continuing operations0.13
 0.15
 0.03
 0.03
Discontinued operations(0.01) 
 0.43
 0.01
Net income0.12
 0.15
 0.46
 0.04
       
Earnings per diluted share(1)
       
Earnings per diluted share(1)
$0.17 $0.07 $0.15 $0.06 
Continuing operations0.13
 0.15
 0.03
 0.03
Discontinued operations(0.01) 
 0.42
 0.01
Net income0.12
 0.15
 0.45
 0.04
       
2016       
20192019
Net sales$215.6
 $224.7
 $197.2
 $163.1
Net sales$266.9 $274.3 $234.0 $192.8 
Gross profit77.8
 83.2
 59.3
 47.6
Gross profit88.8 97.2 74.8 60.1 
Operating income37.8
 22.6
 21.1
 11.4
Operating income39.0 47.2 22.2 15.9 
Income from continuing operations19.8
 11.0
 10.3
 4.0
Discontinued operations6.7
 4.5
 5.4
 2.2
Net income26.5
 15.5
 15.7
 6.2
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)$40.2 $33.7 $10.9 $(21.0)
       
Earnings per basic share(1)
       
Continuing operations0.12
 0.07
 0.06
 0.02
Discontinued operations0.04
 0.03
 0.04
 0.02
Net income0.16
 0.10
 0.10
 0.04
Earnings (loss) per basic share(1)
Earnings (loss) per basic share(1)
$0.26 $0.21 $0.07 $(0.13)
       
Earnings per diluted share(1)
       
Continuing operations0.12
 0.07
 0.06
 0.02
Discontinued operations0.04
 0.02
 0.04
 0.02
Net income0.16
 0.09
 0.10
 0.04
Earnings (loss) per diluted share(1)
Earnings (loss) per diluted share(1)
$0.25 $0.21 $0.07 $(0.13)
(1)The sum of the quarterly amounts may not equal the full year amount due to rounding.
(1)
The sum of the quarterly amounts may not equal the full year amount due to rounding.

F- 3539