Table of Contents




UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
xAnnual report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022
For the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017
OR
OR
oTransition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.
For the transition period from               to               .
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-53036

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER 000-53036

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Indiana20-2327916
(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1554 N. County Road 600 E., Union City, IN 47390
(Address of principal executive offices)
(765) 964-3137
(Registrant's telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to 12(b) of the Act: None.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Membership Units.

1554 N. County Road 600 E., Union City, IN 47390
(Address of principal executive offices)

(765) 964-3137
Registrant's telephone number, including area code

Securities registered pursuant to 12(b) of the Act: None.
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Membership Units.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
o Yes     x No


Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.
o Yes     x No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
x Yes o No


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
x Yes o No


Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer"filer," "smaller reporting company" and "smaller reporting"emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:
Large Accelerated Filer Accelerated Filer  
Non-Accelerated FilerxSmaller Reporting Company
Large Accelerated Filer o
Accelerated Filer  o
Non-Accelerated Filer x
Smaller Reporting Company o
Emerging Growth Companyo
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.                         

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
o Yes     x No


As of March 31, 2017,2022, the aggregate market value of the membership units held by non-affiliates (computed by reference to the most recent offering price of such membership units) was $64,720,000.$48,160,000. There is no established public trading market for our membership units. The aggregate market value was computed by reference to the price at which membership units were last sold by the registrant ($5,000 per unit).


As of November 22, 2017,December 1, 2022, there were 14,606 membership units outstanding.


DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required in Part III of this Annual Report is incorporated herein by reference to the Company's definitive proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days of the close of the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.2022.




1

Table of Contents




INDEX
Page Number
Page Number
PART III
PART IV
SIGNATURES

2

Table of Contents








CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS


This annual report contains historical information, as well as forward-looking statements that involve known and unknown risks and relate to future events, our future financial performance, or our expected future operations and actions. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “expect,” “plan,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “future,” “intend,” “could,” “hope,” “predict,” “target,” “potential,” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other similar expressions. These forward-looking statements are only our predictions based upon current information and involve numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties. Our actual results or actions may differ materially from these forward-looking statements for many reasons, including the reasons described in this report. While it is impossible to identify all such factors, factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those estimated by us include:


Reduction, delay, or elimination of the Renewable Fuel Standard;
Changes in the availability and price of corn, natural gas, and natural gas;grain commodities;
Our inability to secure credit or obtain additional equity financing we may require in the future to continue our operations;
Decreases in the price we receive for our ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, and corn oil;grain commodities;
Our ability to satisfy the financial covenants contained in our credit agreements with our lender;
Our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant and maintain a positive spread between the selling price of our products and our raw material costs;
Negative impacts that our hedging activities may have on our operations;
Ethanol and distillers grains supply exceeding demand and corresponding price reductions;
Our ability to generate free cash flow to invest in our business and service anyour debt;
Changes in the environmental regulations that apply to our plant operations;
Changes in our business strategy, capital improvements or development plans;
Changes in plant production capacity or technical difficulties in operating the plant;
Changes in general economic conditions or the occurrence of certain events causing an economic impact in the agriculture, oil or automobile industries;
Lack of transport, storage and blending infrastructure preventing our products from reaching high demand markets;
Changes in federal and/or state laws;
Changes and advances in ethanol production technology;
Competition from alternative fuel additives;
Changes in interest rates or the lack of credit availability;
Changes in legislation benefiting renewable fuels;
Competition from the increased use of electric vehicles;
Our ability to retain key employees and maintain labor relations;
Volatile commodity and financial markets;
Limitations and restrictions contained in the instruments and agreements governing any indebtedness; and
Decreases in export demand due to the imposition of tariffs by foreign governments on ethanol, and distillers grains, and soybeans produced in the United States.States;

Use by the EPA of small refinery exemptions;
A slowdown in global and regional economic activity, demand for our products and the potential for labor shortages and shipping disruptions resulting from pandemics including COVID-19; and
Global economic uncertainty, inflation, market disruptions and increased volatility in commodity prices caused in part by the Russian invasion of Ukraine and resulting sanctions by the United States and other countries.

The cautionary statements referred to in this section also should be considered in connection with any subsequent written or oral forward-looking statements that may be issued by us or persons acting on our behalf. We undertake no duty to update these forward-looking statements, even though our situation may change in the future. Furthermore, we cannot guarantee future results, events, levels of activity, performance, or achievements. We caution you not to put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report.  You should read this report and the documents that we reference in this report and have filed as exhibits, completely and with the understanding that our actual future results may be materially different from what we currently expect.  We qualify all of our forward-looking statements by these cautionary statements.



3

Table of Contents

AVAILABLE INFORMATION


Information about us is also available at our website at www.cardinalethanol.com, under "Financials and SEC Filing Information" which includes links to the reports we have filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The contents of our website are not incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

3

Table of Contents





PART I


ITEM 1. BUSINESS


Business Development


Cardinal Ethanol, LLC is an Indiana limited liability company formed on February 7, 2005 with the name of Indiana Ethanol, LLC. On September 27, 2005, we changed our name to Cardinal Ethanol, LLC. References to “we,” “us,” “our,” “Cardinal” and the “Company” refer to Cardinal Ethanol, LLC. We were formed for the purpose of raising capital to develop, construct, own and operate a 100 million gallon per year ethanol plant in east central Indiana near Union City, Indiana. We began producing ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil at the plant in November 2008.2008 (the "Ethanol Division"). In August 2010,addition, in 2017 we obtainedadded a new Title V air permit allowing us to increase our annual ethanol production to 140 million gallons compared to 110 million gallons under our previous permit. Our annual ethanol production for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 increased to approximately 125 million gallons. We expect ethanol production for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 to increase further due to the completion of certain projects which added storage capacity, improved process efficiencies, and added an additional cooling tower cell and a beer-degasser.
On October 31, 2016, we purchased approximately 64 acres of land adjacent to our property for a total purchase price of approximately $646,000.

We have completed a construction project to add grain receiving and train loading facilities and additional rail spurs, track and grain storagefacility to allow us to procure, transport and sell grain commodities through our new grain operations (the "Trading Division").

    On January 20, 2022, we entered into an Equipment Purchase and Installation Agreement (the "EPC Agreement") with ICM, Inc. pursuant to which ICM has agreed to engineer, procure, construct, and install its high protein feed system and license to us its proprietary, patent-protected technology to use, operate and maintain the system. Pursuant to the EPC Agreement and subsequent adjustments due to change orders executed by the parties, we expect to pay approximately $50,000,000, including recent change orders, which is payable in installments. This price is subject to further adjustment in the event additional change orders are executed. We will also pay license fees of $10 per ton of PROTOMAX™ produced by the system for a period of 10 years. We expect that we will buy primarily soybeansto fund the project from operations and corn from producers relying principally on forward purchase contracts to ensure an adequate supplyour current credit facilities as amended. We began installation of grain. However, we may also purchase grain the daysystem during the fourth quarter of delivery. Grain prices will typically be comprised of futures prices on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange ("CME") and local basis adjustments. We intend to manage the futures price risk of changing commodity prices by entering into exchange traded futures contracts with the CME. Grain shipments will be made by rail and truck. We anticipate that sales will be made to grain processors and export markets in the southeastern United States and will generally be made by contract for delivery in a future period. Incomeour fiscal year 2022. This project is expected to be earned on grain bought and sold, the appreciation or depreciation in the basis valuecompleted by Fall of the grain held and the appreciation or depreciation between the futures contract months. The Trading Division began operations at the end of our fourth fiscal quarter of 2017. Although we bought soybeans and entered into forward purchase contracts for soybean purchases and sales, we have determined that the Trading Division was not material to our business at September2023.

On March 30, 2017 and therefore, is not a reportable, separate business segment. We intend to continue to monitor the Trading Division to assess its materiality to our business for future periods.

To provide funding for this construction project,2022, we executed a Tenthan Eighteenth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement, with our primary lender, First National Bank of Omaha,to be effective as of February 28, 2017,2022, which amendsamended the First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement dated June 10, 2013. In connection therewith,2013 (the "Amendment"). The primary purposes of the Amendment are to provide additional financing to fund the construction and installation of a system to produce high protein feed at the plant and extend the termination date of the Revolving Credit Loan to February 28, 2023. Please refer to Item 8 - Consolidated Financial Statements - Note 9 - Bank Financingfor more information.

On May 23, 2022, we also executed a Disbursingreceived an award from the USDA Biofuel Producer Program of approximately $7,652,000.

On September 14, 2022, we entered into Amendment No. 4 to the Ethanol Purchase and Sale Agreement Construction Notewith Murex, LLC (the "Murex Amendment"). The Murex Amendment amends the Ethanol Purchase and Sale Agreement dated December 18, 2006, as amended. The Murex Amendment is effective on December 1, 2022. Please refer to Item 1 - Business - Reportable Operating Segments - Ethanol Division for more information.

We have engaged with an unrelated third party to pursue the possible joint development of integrated carbon dioxide facilities, transportation infrastructure and a Third Amendmentcarbon sequestration site for the carbon dioxide emissions produced by our plant (the "CCS Project"). We performed an initial study and assessment of First Amendedthe technical and Restated Construction Loan Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignmenteconomic feasibility of Leasesthe CCS Project and Rentsoptimal commercial structure. As a result, we decided to organize a joint venture entity along with the third party to take certain steps towards implementing the CCS Project including filing the application for the necessary permitting and Fixture Financing Statement.acquiring rights from landowners that will be needed in order to complete the CCS Project. In addition, we have granted certain rights to the joint venture including a surface easement and a lease of pore space below the surface of our property for use in sequestration if the CCS Project is successful. However, the CCS Project is still in its early stages and is subject to many variables that could have a material effect on its feasibility and our ability to construct and complete the CCS Project. Please refer to Item 8 - Financial Statements - Note 816 - Bank FinancingEquity Method Investments for additional details regardingmore information.

Reportable Operating Segments
    Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that are evaluated regularly by the terms of our construction financing.

Throughout the fiscal year, the board of directors periodically declared cash distributionschief operating decision maker in deciding how to the members of recordallocate resources and in assessing performance. Based on the declaration date. The table below showsnature of the datesproducts, services and amountsoperations and the expected financial results, we review our operations within the following two separate operating segments: (1) ethanol production through our Ethanol Division; and (2) trading of these distributionsagricultural grains through our Trading Division. We currently do not have or anticipate we will have any other lines
4

Table of Contents

of business or other significant sources of revenue other than the sale of ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil and the trading of agricultural grains. 
Ethanol Division

In October 2020, we obtained a new Title V air permit allowing us to increase our annual ethanol production to 175 million gallons compared to 140 million gallons under our previous permit. Our annual ethanol production rate for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017:2022 was approximately 135 million gallons annually which is approximately 35% above the nameplate capacity for the plant. 

Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution Paid
November 15, 2016 $600
 $8,763,600
 December 2016
February 14, 2017 200
 2,921,200
 February 2017
May 16, 2017 275
 4,016,650
 May 2017
August 14, 2017 100
 1,460,600
 August 2017
Totals $1,175
 $17,162,050
  



4

Table    Our revenues are primarily derived from the sale of Contents



Subsequent to year end, the board of directors declared a cash distribution. The dateour ethanol, distillers grains and amount is listedcorn oil. We market and sell ethanol and its co-products (distillers grains and corn oil) primarily in the table below:
Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution To Be Paid
November 21, 2017 $400
 $5,842,400
 December 2017

Financial Information

Please refercontinental United States using third party marketers. Murex, LLC markets all of our ethanol. Our distillers grains are marketed by CHS, Inc. We market and distribute all of the corn oil we produce directly to "Item 7 - Management's Discussion end users and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" for information about our revenue, profit and loss measurements and total assets and liabilities and "Item 8 - Financial Statements and Supplementary Data" for our financial statements and supplementary data.third party brokers.    
    
Principal Products


The principal products we are producing at the plantin our Ethanol Division are fuel-grade ethanol and distillers grains. In addition, we are extracting corn oil and capturing a portion of the raw carbon dioxide we produce for sale. The table below shows the approximate percentage of our total ethanol division revenue which is attributed to each of our products for each of our last three fiscal years.

ProductFiscal Year 2022Fiscal Year 2021Fiscal Year 2020
Ethanol80 %77 %75 %
Distillers Grains14 %18 %20 %
Corn Oil%%%
Carbon Dioxide< 1%< 1 %< 1%
Product Fiscal Year 2017 Fiscal Year 2016 Fiscal Year 2015
Ethanol 83% 78% 75%
Distillers Grains 14% 18% 21%
Corn Oil 3% 4% 3%
Carbon Dioxide < 1%
 < 1%
 < 1%


Ethanol


Our primary product is ethanol. Ethanol is ethyl alcohol, a fuel component made primarily from corn and various other grains. The ethanol we produce is manufactured from corn. Although the ethanol industry continues to explore production technologies employing various feedstocks, such as biomass, corn-based production technologies remain the most practical and provide the lowest operating risks. Corn produces large quantities of carbohydrates, which convert into glucose more easily than most other kinds of biomass. The Renewable Fuels Association estimates current domestic ethanol production capacity of approximately 16 billion gallons with approximately 2.5% of that capacity idled as of September 25, 2017.


An ethanol plant is essentially a fermentation plant. Ground corn and water are mixed with enzymes and yeast to produce a substance called “beer,” which contains about 10% alcohol and 90% water. The “beer” is boiled to separate the water, resulting in ethyl alcohol, which is then dehydrated to increase the alcohol content. This product is then mixed with a certified denaturant to make the product unfit for human consumption and commercially saleable.


Ethanol can be used as: (i) an octane enhancer in fuels; (ii) an oxygenated fuel additive for the purpose of reducing ozone and carbon monoxide emissions; and (iii) a non-petroleum-based gasoline substitute. Approximately 95% of all ethanol is used in its primary form for blending with unleaded gasoline and other fuel products. Used as a fuel oxygenate, ethanol provides a means to control carbon monoxide emissions in large metropolitan areas. The principal purchasers of ethanol are generally the wholesale gasoline marketer or blender. The principal markets for our ethanol are petroleum terminals in the northeastern United States.


Distillers Grains


The principal co-product of the ethanol production process is distillers grains, a high protein, high-energy animal feed supplement primarily marketed to the dairy, beef, poultry and swine industries. Dry mill ethanol processing creates three forms of distillers grains: Distillers Wet Grains with Solubles ("DWS"), Distillers Modified Wet Grains with Solubles ("DMWS") and Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles ("DDGS"). DWS is processed corn mash that contains approximately 70% moisture. DWS has a shelf life of approximately three days and can be sold only to farms within the immediate vicinity of an ethanol plant. DMWS is DWS that has been dried to approximately 50% moisture. DMWS have a slightly longer shelf life of approximately ten days and are often sold to nearby markets. DDGS is DWS that has been dried to 10% to 12% moisture.
5

Table of Contents

DDGS has an almost indefinite shelf life and may be sold and shipped to any market regardless of its vicinity to an ethanol plant.

5

Table of Contents





Corn Oil


Since November 2008, we have been separating some of the corn oil contained in our distillers grains for sale. We have worked hard to improve corn oil production levels and continue to fine tune the operation of our equipment to further increase production rates. The corn oil that we produce is not food grade corn oil and therefore cannot be used for human consumption. However, corn oil can be used as the feedstock to produce biodiesel, as a feed ingredient and has other industrial uses.


Carbon Dioxide


Since March 2010, we have been selling some of the carbon dioxide gas produced at the plant.


Ethanol, Distillers Grains, Corn Oil and Carbon Dioxide and Corn Oil Markets


As described below in "Distribution Methods," we market and distribute our ethanol and distillers grains through third parties. Our ethanol and distillers grains marketers make all decisions, in consultation with management, with regard to where our products are marketed. Our ethanol and distillers grains are predominately sold in the domestic market. Specifically, we ship a substantial portion of the ethanol we produce to the New York harbor. We expect our ethanol and distillers grains marketers to explore all markets for our products, including export markets, and believe that there is some potential for increased international sales of our products. However, due to high transportation costs, and the fact that we are not located near a major international shipping port, we expect a majoritylarge portion of our products to continue to be marketed and sold domestically.

Over our past fiscal year, exports of ethanol have increased with Brazil receiving the largest percentage of ethanol produced in the United States and Canada in second place. India, the Philippines and South Korea have also been top destinations. However, in August 2017, Brazil implemented a tariff on ethanol imported from the United States that will be imposed after a 600 million liter quota is met. This tariff has resulted in a decline in ethanol demand from Brazil and is expected to continue to negatively impact demand in the future. In addition, ethanol export demand is typically more unpredictable than domestic demand and tends to fluctuate over time as it is subject to monetary and political forces in other nations. For example, a strong U.S. Dollar is a force that may negatively impact

Canada, India and South Korea were top destinations for ethanol exports during the past year. Exports of ethanol were lower for 2021 but have increased significantly in 2022. However, tariffs implemented by Brazil and China on ethanol imported from the United States.States have reduced export demand from those countries. Tariffs imposed by China remained unchanged during the past year. In March 2022, Brazil suspended its tariff through the end of the year on ethanol imported from the United States following a 10% reduction on the tariff in November 2021. However despite this suspension, Brazil has not become a leading player in the export market in recent months. Trade barriers with key markets may continue to take a toll on ethanol export demand which could negatively affect domestic ethanol prices.


Exports of distillers grains increased in 2021 with the United States exporting about a third of distillers grain produced. The export market has remained strong in 2022 with Mexico, South Korea and Vietnam continuing as top destinations for distillers grains exports. Historically, the United States ethanol industry has exported a significant amount of distillers grains to ChinaChina. The imposition of anti-dumping and Mexico with Vietnam receiving notable amounts. However, the distillers grains market has faced many challengesanti-subsidy duties by China over the past year. On January 10, 2017, China announced a final ruling related to its anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigation imposing anti-dumping duties from a range of 42.2% to 53.7% and anti-subsidy duties from 11.2% to 12.0%. The imposition of these duties has resulted in a significant decline in demand from this top importer requiring United States producers to seek out alternative markets. Vietnam suspended United States exports in December 2016 due to its decision to ban certain fumigants used infive years effectively closed the shipping of distillers grains. However, on September 6, 2017, the Vietnam government resumed imports of distillers grains from the United States which is anticipated to increase imports of distillers grains to thatChinese market.


As described below in "Distribution Methods," we sell carbon dioxide to Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. ("Air Products") (formerly known as EPCO Carbon Dioxide Products, Inc.) and we market and distribute all of the corn oil we produce directly to end users and third party brokers in the domestic market.


Distribution Methods


Our ethanol plant is located near Union City, Indiana in Randolph County. We selected the site because of its locationproximity to existing ethanol consumption and accessibility to road and rail transportation. Our site is in close proximity to rail and major highways that connect to major population centers such as Indianapolis, Cincinnati, Columbus, Cleveland, Toledo, Detroit, New York and Chicago.


Ethanol Distribution


We entered into an Ethanol Purchase and Sale Agreement with Murex, LLC ("Murex") for the purpose of marketing and distributing all of the ethanol we produce at the plant. The initial term of the agreement was five years commencing on the date of first delivery of ethanol with automatic renewal for one year terms thereafter unless otherwise terminated by either party. The agreement may be terminated due to the insolvency or intentional misconduct of either party or upon the default of one of the parties as set forth in the agreement.

6

Table of Contents



Under the terms of the agreement, Murex markets all of our ethanol unless we choose to sell a portion at a retail fueling station owned by us or one of our affiliates. Murex pays to us the purchase price invoiced to the third-party purchaser less all resale costs, taxes paid by Murex and Murex's commission.commission which is calculated on each net gallon of ethanol taken under the agreement. Murex has agreed to purchase on its own account and at
6

Table of Contents

market price any ethanol which it is unable to sell to a third party purchaser. Murex has promised to use its best efforts to obtain the best purchase price available for our ethanol. In addition, Murex has agreed to promptly notify us of any and all price arbitrage opportunities. Under the agreement, Murex is responsible for all transportation arrangements for the distribution of our ethanol. Murex handles all RIN activity, submits regulatory reports, and leases us a minimum number of tank cars for rail transportation and manages the tank car fleet in exchange for a monthly payment.
On November 22, 2011,September 14, 2022, we amended our agreement to provide forexecuted an annual cap on the commission paid to Murex. We also agreedamendment to extend the initial term until December 31, 2024, subject to automatic renewals thereafter for one-year periods unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the end of the current term. The agreement may also be terminated due to the insolvency or intentional misconduct of either party or upon the default of one of the parties as set forth in the agreement. In addition, the amendment added a provision that allows Cardinal to terminate the agreement on 90 days prior written notice if we experience a "Material Change in Control". However, upon termination of the agreement for any reason, we may be obligated to an eleven yearcontinue to deliver ethanol to Murex for a period of time to cover certain contractual commitments for which now expires in 2019.we gave prior written approval. The amendment also provides for certain adjustments to the purchase price for sales made to Murex for its own account or for sales of exported ethanol. If this adjusted price can not be finalized at time of payment, the parties may agree upon a provisional price which shall be trued up later. The amendment will be effective on December 1, 2022.
Distillers Grains Distribution
We have entered into an agreement with CHS, Inc. to market all distillers grains we produce at the plant. CHS, Inc. is a diversified energy, grains and foods company owned by farmers, ranchers and cooperatives. CHS, Inc. provides products and services ranging from grain marketing to food processing to meet the needs of its customers around the world. We receive a percentage of the selling price actually received by CHS, Inc. in marketing our distillers grains to its customers. The initial term of our agreement with CHS, Inc. was for one year commencing as of November 1, 2008. Thereafter, the agreement will remainremains in effect unless otherwise terminated by either party with 120 days notice. Under the agreement, CHS, Inc. is responsible for all transportation arrangements for the distribution of our distillers grains.
Corn Oil Distribution
We market and distribute all of the corn oil we produce directly to end users and third party brokers. Our corn oil is mainly used as an animal feed ingredient and as a feedstock in biodiesel production.
Carbon Dioxide Distribution
We have entered into an agreement with Air Products under which Air Products purchases a portion of the carbon dioxide gas produced at our plant. We entered into a Carbon Dioxide Purchase and Sale Agreement with Air Products under which Air Products was obligated to purchase a minimum of 98,700 tons of carbon dioxide gas. In addition, we entered intoexecuted a Site Lease Agreement with Air Products under which Air Products leasesleased a portion of our property, on which it is operating a carbon dioxide liquefaction plant. We initially suppliedOn November 26, 2019, we sent written notice of termination of the Carbon Dioxide Purchase and Sale Agreement and Site Lease Agreement which was to be effective on June 1, 2020. However, due to disruptions related to COVID-19, the Company and Air Products agreed to rescind the terminations and extend the agreements one year to June 1, 2021. Effective June 1, 2021, we amended the agreement with Air Products. The amendment extended the initial term of the agreement to May 31, 2026 with automatic one-year renewal periods thereafter unless terminated by either party by providing at least six months written notice prior to the liquefaction plant,expiration of the term. The amendment increased the price paid for carbon dioxide subject to a price adjustment in the event of a take or pay shortfall. The amendment also provided that we may do anything we wish with excess carbon dioxide gas meeting certain specifications and at a rate sufficient forproduced provided that if the excess is sold to competitors of Air Products then Air Products' annual take or pay obligation will be reduced accordingly and Air Products has the option to produce 54,750 tons of liquid carbon dioxide perterminate the Agreement upon 90 days written notice. In addition, the amendment provides that, after the three year in exchange for paymentanniversary, we may terminate the agreement upon the occurrence of a contractual price per tonChange of liquid carbon dioxide shipped out of the liquefaction plant by Air Products. In November 2011, we amended this agreement to allow for an expansion of the carbon dioxide liquefaction plant which was completedControl Event as defined in September 2012. Under the amendment Air Products pays us for a minimum of 98,700 tons each year or approximately $493,500 annually.if we decide to sequester our carbon dioxide.
Federal Ethanol Supports and Governmental Regulation


Federal Ethanol Supports


The ethanol industry is dependent on several economic incentives to produce ethanol. One significant federal ethanol support is the Federal Renewable Fuels Standard (the “RFS”). The RFS requires that in each year, a certain amount of renewable fuels must be used in the United States. The RFS is a national program that does not require that any renewable fuels be used in any particular area or state, allowing refiners to use renewable fuel blends in those areas where it is most cost-effective. The RFS statutory volume requirement increasesincreased incrementally each year until the United States is requiredreached the requirement to use 36 billion gallons of renewable fuels byin 2022. Starting in 2009, the RFS required that a portion of the RFS
7

Table of Contents

must be met by certain “advanced” renewable fuels. These advanced renewable fuels include ethanol that is not made from corn, such as cellulosic ethanol and biomass based biodiesel. The use of these advanced renewable fuels increases each year as a percentage of the total renewable fuels required to be used in the United States.

The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has the authority to waive the RFS statutory volume requirement, in whole or in part, provided one of the following two conditions have been met: (1) there is inadequate domestic renewable fuel supply; or (2) implementation of the requirement would severely harm the economy or environment of a state, region or the United States. Annually, the EPA is required by statute to pass a rule that establishes the number of gallons of different types of renewable fuels that must be used in the United States which is called the renewable volume obligation.obligation ("RVO"). The statutory volumes and the EPA's volumes for 2014, 2015, 20162020, 2021 and 20172022 (in billion gallons) are as follows:

Total Renewable Fuel Volume RequirementPortion of Volume Requirement That Can Be Met By Corn-based Ethanol
2020Statutory30.0015.00
EPA Rule 12/201920.0915.00
EPA Rule 7/202217.1312.50
2021Statutory33.0015.00
EPA Rule 7/202218.8413.79
2022Statutory36.0015.00
EPA Rule 7/202220.63 (+0.25)15.00
7

Table of Contents



  Total Renewable Fuel Volume RequirementPortion of Volume Requirement That Can Be Met By Corn-based Ethanol
2014Statutory18.1514.40
EPA Rule 11/30/201516.2813.61
2015Statutory20.5015.00
EPA Rule 11/30/201516.9314.05
2016Statutory22.2515.00
EPA Rule 11/30/201518.1114.50
2017Statutory24.0015.00
 EPA Rule 11/30/201619.2815.00

On May 18, 2017,In July 2022, the EPA retroactively reduced the RVO for total renewable fuel for 2020 to 17.13 billion gallons. The portion that could be met by corn-based ethanol was reduced to 12.50 billion for 2020. The EPA indicated that the reason for this retroactive proposed change was due to program and market challenges, including those related to the COVID-19 pandemic. In addition, the EPA set the RVO for total renewable fuel for 2021 at 18.84 billion gallons and for 2022 to 20.63 billion gallons. The portion that could be met by corn-based ethanol was 13.79 billion for 2021 and 15 billion gallons for 2022. The EPA also added a 250 million gallon supplemental obligation in 2022 and stated its intention to do the same for 2023. The EPA has not yet released athe proposed rulerules to set the renewable volume obligation for 2018.2023.

    Small refineries can petition the EPA annually for an exemption from their ethanol use requirements for the prior compliance year. The EPA proposesgranted significantly more small refinery waivers in 2018 and 2019 than in past years and did not reallocate the waived gallons to setother refiners. These actions resulted in decreased ethanol demand which led to reduced market ethanol prices and negative operating margins in the total volume obligation at 19.24 billion gallonsethanol industry. In January 2020, the Tenth Circuit Court of which 15.0 billion gallon couldAppeals ruled that small refinery exemptions may only be metgranted to refineries that had secured them continuously each year since 2010. Consistent with this ruling, in September 2020, the EPA denied certain small refinery exemption petitions filed by corn-based ethanol. A public hearingoil refineries in 2020 seeking retroactive relief from their ethanol use requirements for prior years. In June 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed the decision finding that a small refinery may obtain a hardship exemption even if its earlier exemption had lapsed in one or more previous years. In June 2022, the EPA announced the denial of 69 small refinery exemption petitions for one or more compliance years between 2016 and 2021 on the proposed rule was held in June andgrounds that the public comment expired on August 31, 2017. The final rule is expectedpetitioners had failed to be issued in November 2017. Ifshow that the volume requirements of the RFS wereEPA had a basis to be reduced, it could have an adverse effect on market prices and demand for ethanol.approve them.


In February 2010, the EPA issued new regulations governing the RFS. These new regulations have been called RFS2. The most controversial part of RFS2 involves what is commonly referred to as the lifecycle analysis of green house gas emissions. Specifically, the EPA adopted rules to determine which renewable fuels provided sufficient reductions in green house gases, compared to conventional gasoline, to qualify under the RFS program. RFS2 establishes a tiered approach, where regular renewable fuels are required to accomplish a 20% green house gas reduction compared to gasoline, advanced biofuels and biomass-based biodiesel must accomplish a 50% reduction in green house gases, and cellulosic biofuels must accomplish a 60% reduction in green house gases. Any fuels that fail to meet this standard cannot be used by fuel blenders to satisfy their obligations under the RFS program. The scientific method of calculating these green house gas reductions has been a contentious issue. Many in the ethanol industry were concerned that corn based ethanol would not meet the 20% green house gas reduction requirement based on certain parts of the environmental impact model that many in the ethanol industry believed was scientifically suspect. However, RFS2 as adopted by the EPA provides that corn-based ethanol from modern ethanol production processes does meetmeets the definition of a renewable fuel under the RFS program. Our ethanol plant was grandfathered into the RFS up to 115,000,000 gallons annually due to the fact that it was constructed prior to the effective date of the lifecycle green house gas requirement and isrequirement. Therefore, we are not required to prove compliance with the lifecycle green house gas reductions.reductions for a significant amount of our production. Certain provisions of RFS2 as adopted may disproportionately benefit ethanol produced from sugarcane. This could make sugarcane based ethanol, which is primarily produced in Brazil, more competitive in the United States ethanol market. If this were to occur, it could reduce demand for the ethanol that we produce.
8

Table of Contents

Most ethanol that is used in the United States is sold in a blend called E10. E10 is a blend of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline. E10 is approved for use in all standard vehicles. In 2016,2021, gasoline demand in the United States was approximately 143135 billion gallons.gallons which was a significant increase over consumption in 2020. Assuming that all gasoline in the United States is blended at a rate of 10% ethanol and 90% gasoline, the maximum demand for ethanol is 14.3in 2021 was 13.5 billion gallons per year. This is commonly referred to as the “blending wall,” which represents a theoretical limit where more ethanol cannot be blended into the national gasoline pool. This is a theoretical limit because it is believed that it would not be possible to blend ethanol into every gallon of gasoline that is being used in the United States and it discounts the possibility of additional ethanol used in higher percentage blends. Gasoline demand is estimated to rise in 2022 but remain shy of pre-COVID-19 levels due in part to higher gasoline prices.


In June 2012, the EPA gave final approval for the sale of E15, gasoline which is blended at a rate of 15% ethanol and 85% gasoline, for use in vehicles manufactured in the model year 2001 and later. Although there have been significant steps towards introduction of E15 in the marketplace, there are still obstacles to meaningful market penetration by E15. Many states still have regulatory issues that hamper or prevent the sale of E15. In addition, sales of E15 may be limited because E15 is not approved for use in all vehicles, the EPA requires a label that may discourage consumers from using E15, and retailers may choose not to sell E15 due to concerns regarding liability. In addition,Previously, different gasoline blendstocks may bewere required at certain times of

8

Table of Contents



the year in order to use E15 due to federal regulations related to fuel evaporative emissions which may preventprevented E15 from being used during certain times of the year in various states. In May 2019, the EPA issued a final rule allowing the year-round sale of E15. However in June 2021, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia struck down this rule finding that the EPA exceeded its authority. In May 2022, the EPA issued an emergency waiver to allow sales of E15 during the summer months. The reason given for the temporary suspension of the prohibition on year-round sales was that it was an effort to counteract rising gasoline prices. It appears that the EPA is considering enacting a rule to allow year-round sales before next summer. However, it is unclear whether that will occur.

    
A blender pump is a gasoline pump that can dispense a variety of different ethanol/gasoline blends. Blender pumps typically can dispense E10, E20, E30, E40, E50 and E85. These blender pumps accomplish these different ethanol/gasoline blends by internally mixing ethanol and gasoline which are held in separate tanks at the retail gas stations. Many in the ethanol industry believe that increased use of blender pumps will increase demand for ethanol by allowing gasoline retailers to provide various mid-level ethanol blends in a cost effective manner and allowing consumers with flex-fuel vehicles to purchase more ethanol through these mid-level blends. However, the expense of blender pumps has delayed their availability in the retail gasoline market.


In May 2020, the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") announced the Higher Blends Infrastructure Incentive Program which consists of up to $100 million in funding for grants to be used to increase the availability of higher blends of ethanol and biodiesel fuels. Funds may be awarded to retailers such as fueling stations and convenience stores to assist in the cost of installation or upgrading of fuel pumps and other infrastructure. To date, the USDA has awarded approximately $74 million to eligible projects.

On August 16, 2022, the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022, which has several provisions that may benefit the ethanol industry, was signed into law. There is, however, considerable uncertainty as to how the newly required provisions will be implemented in future regulatory guidance. The Inflation Reduction Act maintains the 12-year credit period for the existing Section 45Q tax credit for carbon capture and storage ("CCS"). However, the Act extends eligibility for the credit to facilities that have commenced construction by December 31, 2032, and substantially lowers the minimum annual capture requirements to 12,500 tons for qualifying facilities. In addition, the potential credit rate is increased five times for industrial facilities and power plants that capture their carbon emissions to $85 per metric ton of carbon oxide stored in secure geologic formations, $60 per ton for the beneficial utilization of captured carbon emissions, and $60 per ton for carbon oxide stored in oil and gas fields. Prevailing wage and apprenticeship requirements must be met by the facility to claim the full amount of the higher credit. In addition, projects will now be eligible to be directly paid for the credit by the Internal Revenue Service for the first five years with no direct pay for many projects for the final seven years of the credit, and, as an alternative to direct pay, projects will now be allowed to sell their credits to unrelated third parties for cash without adverse tax consequences. The Act also creates a Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit for the production of low-emissions transportation fuel produced and sold in 2025, 2026 and 2027, subject to certain requirements as to prevailing wage and apprenticeship. However, the Act provides that the Clean Fuel Production Tax Credit is not available for a facility that qualifies for the Section 45Q tax credit. Additional incentives for production of sustainable aviation fuel and $500 million in funding for biofuels infrastructure funding are also included in the Act.

Effect of Governmental Regulation


The government's regulation of the environment changes constantly. We are subject to extensive air, water and other environmental regulations and we have been required to obtain a number of environmental permits to construct and operate the
9

Table of Contents

plant. It is possible that more stringent federal or state environmental rules or regulations could be adopted, which could increase our operating costs and expenses. It also is possible that federal or state environmental rules or regulations could be adopted that could have an adverse effect on the use of ethanol. For example, changes in the environmental regulations regarding the required oxygen content of automobile emissions could have an adverse effect on the ethanol industry. Plant operations are governed by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (“OSHA”). OSHA regulations may change such that the costs of operating the plant may increase. Any of these regulatory factors may result in higher costs or other adverse conditions affecting our operations, cash flows and financial performance.


In late 2009, California passed a Low Carbon Fuels Standard ("LCFS"). The California LCFS requires that renewable fuels used in California must accomplish certain reductions in greenhouse gases which is measured using a lifecycle analysis, similar to the RFS. On December 29, 2011, a federal district court in California ruled that the California LCFS was unconstitutional which halted implementation of the California LCFS. However, the California Air Resources Board ("CARB") appealed this court ruling and on September 18, 2013, the federal appellate court reversed the federal district court finding the LCFS constitutional and remanding the case back to federal district court to determine whether the LCFS imposes a burden on interstate commerce that is excessive in light of the local benefits. On June 30, 2014, the United States Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal of the federal appellate court ruling and CARB recently re-adopted the LCFS with some slight modifications. The LCFS could have a negative impact on demand for corn-based ethanol and result in decreased ethanol prices affecting our ability to operate profitably.    


We have obtained all of the necessary permits to operate the plant. In the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017,2022, we incurred costs and expenses of approximately $260,000$138,000 complying with environmental laws. Although we have been successful in obtaining all of the permits currently required, any retroactive change in environmental regulations, either at the federal or state level, could require us to obtain additional or new permits or spend considerable resources in complying with such regulations.


We are subject to regulation by many governmental agencies, both federal and state. The chart below refers to some of the most important agencies and the areas of regulation.

AgencyArea of Regulation
U.S. Environmental Protection AgencyEnvironmental Discharge and Renewable Volume Obligations
Indiana Department of Environmental ManagementAir Permit and Environmental Discharge
Alcohol and Tobacco Tax and Trade BureauRegulation of Alcohol Fuel and Distilled Spirits Permit
Federal Railroad AdministrationShipments Via Rail of Hazardous Material
U.S. Department of AgricultureFood Safety Modernization Act
Indiana Department of AgricultureGrain Procurement
U.S. Occupational Safety and Health AdministrationWorkplace Safety
U.S. Department of LaborWage and Hour
U.S. Immigration and Customs EnforcementEmployment Eligibilty of Alien Workers
U.S. Securities Exchange CommissionPublic Reporting of Financial Related Information
U.S. Internal Revenue ServiceTax Policy
Commodities Futures Trading CommissionDodd-Frank and Commodities Trading

If any of these agencies find us in violation of any regulation, we could incur significant penalties and other economic disadvantages, including loss of permission to operate.

Competition


Ethanol


We are in direct competition with numerous ethanol producers, manyseveral of whom have greater resources than we do. Following the significant growth during 2005 and 2006, the ethanol industry has grown at a much slower pace. As of September 25, 2017,The ethanol industry was impacted by the pandemic in fiscal year 2020, which resulted in decreased demand. The ethanol industry rebounded in 2021. The Renewable Fuels Association estimates that there are 214approximately 204 ethanol production facilities in the United States with capacity to produce approximately 1617.5 billion gallons of ethanol and five additional plants under expansion or construction with capacity to produce an additional 273 million gallons. However, the Renewable Fuels Association estimates that approximately 2.5%ethanol.
10

Table of the ethanol production capacity in the United States is idled.Contents


Since ethanol is a commodity product, competition in the industry is predominantly based on price. We have also experienced increased competition from oil companies who have purchased ethanol production facilities. These oil companies are required to blend a certain amount of ethanol each year. Therefore, the oil companies may be able to operate their ethanol production facilities at times when it is unprofitable for us to operate. Larger ethanol producers may be able to realize economies of scale that we are unable to realize. This could put us at a competitive disadvantage to other ethanol producers. The ethanol industry is continuing to consolidate where a few larger ethanol producers are increasing their production capacities and are controlling a larger portion of the United States ethanol production. Further, some ethanol producers own multiple ethanol plants which may allow them to compete more effectively by providing them flexibility to run certain production facilities while they have other facilities shut down. This added flexibility may allow these ethanol producers to compete more effectively, especially during periods when operation margins are unfavorable in the ethanol industry.


9

TableFollowing the acquisition of Contents




Theseveral plants by POET Biorefining from Flint Hills Resources in 2021, the largest ethanol producers now include Archer Daniels Midland, Flint Hill Resources LP, Green Plains Renewable Energy, POET Biorefining and Valero Renewable Fuels, each of which are capable of producing significantly more ethanol than we produce.


The following table identifies the majority of the largest ethanol producers in the United States along with their production capacities.


U.S. FUEL ETHANOL PRODUCTION CAPACITY
BY TOP PRODUCERS
Producers of Approximately 750
million gallons per year (mmgy) or more

Company
Approximate Current Capacity

(mmgy)

POET Biorefining2,811
Valero Renewable Fuels1,747
Archer Daniels Midland1,8761,613
POET Biorefining1,684
Green Plains Renewable Energy1,461958
Valero Renewable Fuels1,400
Flint Hill Resources LP820
Updated: September 25, 2017

The ethanol industry in the United States experienced increased competition from ethanol produced outside of the United States during 2012 which was likely the result of the expiration of the tariff on imported ethanol which expired on December 31, 2011. Although ethanol imports have since decreased, if competition from ethanol imports were to increase again that could negatively impact demand for ethanol produced in the United States which could result in lower operating margins.

We also anticipate increased competition from renewable fuels that do not use corn as the feedstock. Many of the current ethanol production incentives are designed to encourage the production of renewable fuels using raw materials other than corn. One type of ethanol production feedstock is cellulose. Cellulose is the main component of plant cell walls and is the most common organic compound on earth. Cellulose is found in wood chips, corn stalks, rice, straw, amongst other common plants. Cellulosic ethanol is ethanol produced from cellulose. Several companies and researchers have commenced pilot projects to study the feasibility of commercially producing cellulosic ethanol and are producing cellulosic ethanol on a small scale and a few companies in the United States have begun producing on a commercial scale. Additional commercial scale cellulosic ethanol plants could be completed in the near future. If this technology can be profitably employed on a commercial scale, it could potentially lead to ethanol that is less expensive to produce than corn based ethanol. Cellulosic ethanol may also capture more government subsidies and assistance than corn based ethanol. This could decrease demand for our product or result in competitive disadvantages for our ethanol production process.


Our ethanol plant also competes with producers of other gasoline additives having similar octane and oxygenate values as ethanol. Alternative fuels, gasoline oxygenates and alternative ethanol production methods are also continually under development. The major oil companies have significantly greater resources than we have to market other additives, to develop alternative products, and to influence legislation and public perception of ethanol. These companies also have sufficient resources to begin production of ethanol should they choose to do so.


    A number of automotive, industrial and power generation manufacturers are developing alternative clean power systems using fuel cells, plug-in hybrids, electric cars or clean burning gaseous fuels. Electric car technology has recently grown in popularity, especially in urban areas. While currentlyin the past there arewere a limited number of vehicle recharging stations, making electric cars not feasible for all consumers, there has been an increased focus on developing these recharging stations which may makehave made electric car technology more widely available in the future.available. This additional competition from alternate sources could reduce the demand for ethanol, which would negatively impact our profitability.


Distillers Grains Competition


Ethanol plants in the Midwest produce the majority of distillers grains and primarily compete with other ethanol producers in the production and sales of distillers grains. Ethanol plants produced approximately 4235.4 million metric tons of distillers grains in 2016.2021.


10

Table of Contents




The primary consumers of distillers grains are dairy and beef cattle. In recent years, an increasing amount of distillers grains have been used in the swine and poultry markets. Numerous feeding trials show advantages in milk production, growth, rumen health, and palatability over other dairy cattle feeds. With the advancement of research into the feeding rations of
11

Table of Contents

poultry and swine, we expect these markets to expand and create additional demand for distillers grains; however, no assurance can be given that these markets will in fact expand, or if they do, that we will benefit from it. The market for distillers grains is generally confined to locations where freight costs allow it to be competitively priced against other feed ingredients. Distillers grains compete with three other feed formulations: soybean meal, corn gluten feed, dry brewers grain and mill feeds. The primary value of these products as animal feed is their protein content. DrySoybean meal, dry brewers grain and distillers grains have about the same protein content, and corn gluten feed and mill feeds have slightly lower protein contents.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials
Corn Feedstock Supply
The major raw material required for our ethanol plant to produce ethanol, distillers grain and corn oil is corn. To produce 135 million gallons of ethanol per year, our ethanol plant needs approximately 47 million bushels of corn per year, or approximately 129,000 bushels per day, as the feedstock for its dry milling process. Traditionally, corn grown in the area of the plant site has been fed locally to livestock or exported for feeding or processing and/or overseas export sales.


The price at which we purchase corn will depend on prevailing market prices. We are significantly dependent on the availability and price of corn. The price and availability of corn are subject to significant fluctuations depending upon a number of factors affecting grain commodity prices in general, including crop conditions, weather, governmental programs and foreign purchases. Because the market price of ethanol is not directly related to grain prices, ethanol producers are generally not able to compensate for increases in the cost of grain feedstock through adjustments in prices charged for their ethanol. We therefore anticipate that our plant's profitability will be negatively impacted during periods of high grain prices.
In an attempt to minimize the effects of the volatility of corn costs on operating profits, we take hedging positions in corn futures markets. Hedging means protecting the price at which we buy corn and the price at which we will sell our products in the future. It is a way to attempt to reduce the risk caused by price fluctuation. The effectiveness of hedging activities is dependent upon, among other things, the cost of corn and our ability to sell sufficient amounts of ethanol and distillers grains to utilize all of the corn subject to the futures contracts. Hedging activities can result in costs to us because price movements in grain contracts are highly volatile and are influenced by many factors beyond our control. These costs may be significant.


High corn prices have a negative effect on our operating margins unless the price of ethanol and distillers grains out paces rising corn prices. Corn prices were lowerhigher during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017,2022, compared to the same period in 20162021 due primarily to a smaller crop carryout in some areas from the 2021 harvest and concerns regarding predictions of the corn crop for fall of 2022. In addition, global economic uncertainty, rising inflation, market disruptions and increased supply resulting from a plentiful 2016 harvestvolatility in ourcommodity prices contributed to higher corn supply region.prices. On October 12, 2017,2022, the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA")USDA released a report estimating the 20172022 corn crop in the United States at approximately 14.313.9 billion bushels, down 6%8% from last year's production, with yields averaging 171.8171.9 bushels per acre. The USDA forecasted area harvested for grain at 83.180.8 million acres, down 4%5% from 2016. If realized, this would be the second highest national yield and production on record.2021. The Indiana corn crop is estimated to be approximately 903944 million bushels, down 5%approximately 8% from 2016.2021. Yields in Indiana are expected to be approximately 173187 bushels per acre, similar to 2016.down approximately 4% from 2021. Management will continue to monitor the availability of corn in our area.

Risk Management Services

We entered into a Risk Management Agreement with John Stewart & Associates ("JS&A") under which JS&A provides risk management and related services pertaining to grain hedging, grain pricing information, aid in purchase of grain, and assistance in risk management as it pertains to ethanol and our co-products. In exchange for JS&A's risk management services, we pay JS&A a fee of $1,500 per month. We entered into the agreement in July of 2007 and the initial term of the agreement was for one year. We are currently on a month to month basis for this contract with JS&A. The agreement may be terminated by either party at any time upon written notice.

We also entered into an agreement with Advance Trading to assist us with hedging corn, ethanol and natural gas. We pay them a fee of $3,000 per month for these services. The term of the agreement is month-to-month and may be terminated by either party at any time upon proper notice.

We also entered into an agreement with Commodity & Ingredient Hedging, LLC to evaluate and provide marketing advice and margin management related to cash sales and purchases, forward contracts and exchange-traded futures and options. We pay an annual fee of $12,000 in exchange for these services. We entered into the agreement in July of 2014 for an initial term of six

11

Table of Contents



months. The agreement automatically renews for additional one year terms unless either party gives written notice of non-renewal as provided in the agreement.


Utilities


We engaged Capstone Energy Services, LLC ("Capstone") to provide us with on-going energy management services. Capstone manages the procurement and delivery of energy to our location. They assist with strategy development, cost analysis, risk management, supply management and reporting services in exchange for a monthly fee. The agreement commenced on June 1, 2015, and continues for one year unless earlier terminated due to an event of default. Following the expiration of the initial one-year term, the agreement will be on a month-to-month basis and may be terminated by either party upon sixty days prior written notice.
Natural Gas


Natural gas is also an important input commodity to our manufacturing process. Our natural gas usage for our fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022 was approximately 3.08%0.9% more MMBTUs than for last fiscal year, constituting approximately 4.82%3.9% of our total costs of goods sold. We are using natural gas to produce process steam and to dry our distillers grain products to a moisture content at which they can be stored for long periods of time, and can be transported greater distances, so that we can market the product to broader livestock markets, including poultry and swine markets in the continental United States.


On March 20, 2007, we entered into a Long-Term Transportation Service Contract for Redelivery of Natural Gas with Ohio Valley Gas Corporation ("Ohio Valley"). Under the contract, Ohio Valley receives, transports and redelivers natural gas to us for all of our natural gas requirements up to a maximum of 100,000 therms per purchase gas day and our estimated annual
12

Table of Contents

natural gas requirements of 34,000,000 therms. For all gas received for and redelivereddelivered to us by Ohio Valley, we pay a throughput rate in the amount of $0.0138 per therm for the first five years of the contract term, and $0.0138 increased by the compounded inflation rate as established and determined by the U.S. Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers for Transportation for the following five years. In addition, we pay a service charge for all gas received for and redelivereddelivered to us by Ohio Valley in the amount of $750 per delivery meter per billing cycle per month for the first five years of the contract term and $750 increased by the compounded inflation rate over the initial rate as established and determined by the U.S. Consumer Price Index - All Urban Consumers for Transportation for the following five years. The initial term of the contract iswas ten years. Provided neither party terminates the contract, the contract will automatically renew for a series of not more than three consecutive one year periods.


Electricity


We require a significant amount of electrical power to operate the plant. On May 2, 2007, we entered into an agreement with Indiana Michigan Power Company to furnish our electric energy. The initial term of the contract was 30 months from the time service is commenced and continues thereafter unless terminated by either party with 12 months written notice. We pay Indiana Michigan Power Company monthly pursuant to their standard rates.


Water


We require a significant supply of water. Engineering specifications show our plant's water requirements to be approximately 774 gallons per minute, 1.1 million gallons per day, depending on the quality of water. We have assessed our water needs and available supply and have determined that we have an adequate supply. Union City Water Works is supplying the water necessary to operate our plant.


         Much of theRecycling water used in our ethanol plant is recycled back into the process. There are, however, certain areas of production where fresh water is needed. Those areas include boiler makeup water and cooling tower water. Boiler makeup water is treated on-site to minimize all elements that will harm the boiler and recycled water cannot be used for this process. Cooling tower water is deemed non-contact water because it does not come in contact with the mash, and, therefore, can be regenerated back into the cooling tower process. The makeup water requirements for the cooling tower are primarily a result of evaporation. Much of the water can be recycled back into the process which minimizes the discharge water. This will have the long-term effect of lowering wastewater treatment costs. Many new plants today are zero or near zero effluent discharge facilities. Our plant design incorporates the ICM/Phoenix Bio-Methanator wastewater treatment process resulting in a zero discharge of plant process water. There are, however, certain areas of production where fresh water is needed.

Employees
We have 55 full-time employees as of November 22, 2017.


12

Table of Contents



Research and Development

We do not conduct any research and development activities associated with the development of new technologies for use in producing ethanol and distillers grains.


Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises and Concessions


We do not currently hold any patents, trademarks, franchises or concessions. We were granted a license by ICM, Inc. to use certain ethanol production technology necessary to operate our ethanol plant. The cost of the license granted by ICM, Inc. was included in the amount we paid to Fagen, Inc. to design and build our ethanol plant. In addition, we were granted a license by ICM, Inc. to use certain corn oil technologies necessary to extract corn oil during our plant operations.


Seasonality of Ethanol Sales


We experience some seasonality of demand for ethanol. Since ethanol is predominantly blended with conventional gasoline for use in automobiles, ethanol demand tends to shift in relation to gasoline demand. As a result, we experience some seasonality of demand for ethanol in the summer months related to increased driving. In addition, we experience some increased ethanol demand during holiday seasons related to increased gasoline demand.


Working Capital

We primarily use our working capital for purchases of raw materials necessary to operate the ethanol plant. Our primary source of working capital is cash we generate from our operations along with our Declining Loan and our Revolving Credit Loan with our primary lender First National Bank of Omaha. The Declining Loan provides $5,000,000 in total for us to use on capital projects allowing us to preserve our working capital at a sufficient level. At September 30, 2017, we have approximately $15,000,000 available to draw on the Revolving Credit Loan to provide additional working capital. We will discuss the Declining Loan and Revolving Loan in more detail in "Item 7- Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers


As discussed above, we have entered into a marketing agreement with Murex for the purpose of marketing and distributing our ethanol and have engaged CHS, Inc. for the purpose of marketing and distributing our distillers grains. We rely on Murex for the sale and distribution of our ethanol and CHS, Inc. for the sale and distribution of our distillers grains. Therefore, although there are other marketers in the industry, we are highly dependent on Murex and CHS, Inc. for the successful marketing of our products. Any loss of Murex or CHS, Inc. as our marketing agent for our ethanol and distillers grains, respectively, could have a significant negative impact on our revenues.
Financial Information about Geographic AreasTrading Division


All    We procure, transport and sell grain commodities through our Trading Division, which began operations at the end of our fourth fiscal quarter of 2017.


13

Table of Contents

Principal Products
    We have and expect to continue to buy primarily soybeans and corn from producers relying principally on forward purchase contracts to ensure an adequate supply of grain. However, we occasionally also purchase grain the day of delivery. Grain prices are typically comprised of futures prices on the Chicago Mercantile Exchange ("CME") and local basis adjustments.

Grain Markets and Distribution Methods

    Grain shipments are made by rail and truck. Our sales are made to grain processors and export markets in the southeastern United States. Our grain sales are generally made by contract for delivery in a future period. Income is expected to be earned on grain bought and sold, the appreciation or depreciation in the basis value of the grain held and the appreciation or depreciation between the futures contract months.

Competition

    We primarily compete in the purchase of grain on a local or regional basis although there are some larger national and international companies that maintain regional grain purchase and storage facilities. We compete in the sale of grain with other public and private grain brokers, elevator operators and farmer owned cooperatives. Competition is based primarily on price, service and reliability.

Seasonality of Grain Purchases and Sales

    Our grain operations are domiciledsomewhat seasonal in nature in that the grain we procure is harvested in October and November. The largest portion of the grain is delivered by producers in the United States. Allfall although we buy and sell a significant portion of our grain throughout the year.

Risk Management

    We manage the futures price risk of changing commodity prices by entering into exchange-traded futures contracts on the CME. The CME is a regulated commodity futures exchange that maintains futures markets for the grain we trade. Futures prices are determined by worldwide supply and demand.

    We entered into a Risk Management Agreement with John Stewart & Associates ("JS&A") under which JS&A provides risk management and related services pertaining to grain hedging, grain pricing information, aid in purchase of grain, and assistance in risk management as it pertains to ethanol, co-products and soybeans. In exchange for JS&A's risk management services, we pay JS&A a fee of $1,500 per month. We are currently on a month to month basis for this contract with JS&A. The agreement may be terminated by either party at any time upon written notice.

We also entered into an agreement with Advance Trading to assist us with hedging corn, ethanol, natural gas and soybeans. We pay them a fee of $3,000 per month for these services. The term of the products soldagreement is month-to-month and may be terminated by either party at any time upon proper notice.

We also entered into an agreement with Commodity & Ingredient Hedging, LLC to our customersevaluate and provide marketing advice and margin management related to cash sales and purchases, forward contracts and exchange-traded futures and options. We pay an annual fee of $12,000 in exchange for fiscal years 2017, 2016 and 2015 were producedthese services. The agreement automatically renews for additional one year terms unless either party gives written notice of non-renewal as provided in the United States and allagreement.

Employees
    We have 66 full-time employees as of December 1, 2022. We employ individuals in the local region around our one facility. Many of our long-lived assetsemployees require some technical or professional background and we compete for them via wages and benefits. We attract them from schools and colleges within our region, which are domicilednumerous. There are several other ethanol plants within a fifty mile radius of our facility. Individuals with ethanol specific skills are available to us because of this proximity. However, this competition for resources also presents a challenge in retaining those with specialized skills.


14

Table of Contents

Working Capital

    We primarily use our working capital for purchases of raw materials necessary to operate the United States.

Ethanol Division and for purchases of grain commodities for the Trading Division. Our primary sources of working capital is cash we generate from our operations along with our Declining Loan and our Revolving Credit Loan with our primary lender First National Bank of Omaha. The Declining Loan provides $36,000,000 in total for us to use on capital projects allowing us to preserve our working capital at a sufficient level. We have engaged third-party professional marketers who decide whereICM, Inc. to install a system to produce high protein feed which is currently expected to cost approximately $50,000,000 including recent change orders, and be funded from operations and borrowings from the Declining Loan. We have also engaged with an unrelated third party to pursue the CCS Project. However, the CCS Project is subject to many variables that could have a material effect on its feasibility and our ethanolability to construct and distillers grains are marketed andcomplete the CCS Project.

At September 30, 2022, we have no control over the marketing decisions made by our third-party professional marketers. These third-party marketers may decideapproximately $20,000,000 available to sell our products in countries other than the United States. Over the past fiscal year, exports of ethanol and distillers grains produced in the United States have increased. However, although there is some potential to sell our productsdraw on the international markets, we anticipate that our productsRevolving Credit Loan to provide working capital. We will still primarily be marketeddiscuss the Declining Loan and soldRevolving Credit Loan in the United States.more detail in "Item 7- Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations".


We sell our corn oil locally to end users and third party brokers and our carbon dioxide is sold to Air Products which operates a carbon dioxide liquefaction plant on our property.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


You should carefully read and consider the risks and uncertainties below and the other information contained in this report.  The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones we may face.  The following risks, together with additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem immaterial could impair our financial condition and results of operation.



13

Table of Contents



Risks Relating to Our Business


Our existing debt financing agreements contain, and our future debt financing agreements may contain, restrictive covenants that limit distributions and impose restrictions on the operation of our business. The use of debt financing makes it more difficult for us to operate because we must make principal and interest payments on the indebtedness and abide by covenants contained in our debt financing agreements. Although we have significantly reduced our level of debt, the restrictive covenants contained in our financing agreements may have important implications on our operations, including, among other things: (a) limiting our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing; (b) subjecting all or substantially all of our assets to liens; and (c) limiting our ability to make business and operational decisions regarding our business, including, among other things making capital improvements and selling or purchasing assets or engaging in transactions we deem to be appropriate and in our best interest.


    Failures of our information technology infrastructure could have a material adverse effect on operations.  We utilize various software applications and other information technology that are critically important to our business operations. We rely on information technology networks and systems, including the Internet, to process, transmit and store electronic and financial information, to manage a variety of business processes and activities, including production, manufacturing, financial, logistics, sales, marketing and administrative functions. We depend on our information technology infrastructure to communicate internally and externally with employees, customers, suppliers and others. We also use information technology networks and systems to comply with regulatory, legal and tax requirements. These information technology systems, some of which are managed by third parties, may be susceptible to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to failures during the process of upgrading or replacing software, databases or components thereof, power outages, hardware failures, computer viruses, attacks by computer hackers or other cybersecurity risks, telecommunication failures, user errors, natural disasters, terrorist attacks or other catastrophic events. If any of our significant information technology systems suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown, and our disaster recovery and business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, our product sales, financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
A cyber attack or other information security breach could have a material adverse effect on our operations and result in financial losses. We are regularly the target of attempted cyber and other security threats and must continuously monitor and develop our information technology networks and infrastructure to prevent, detect, address and mitigate the risk of unauthorized access, misuse, computer viruses and other events that could have a security impact.  If we are unable to prevent cyber attacks and other information security breaches, we may encounter significant disruptions in our operations which could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations or result in the unauthorized disclosure of confidential information. Such breaches may also harm our reputation, result in financial losses or subject us to litigation or other costs or penalties.

15

Table of Contents

We may violate the terms of our credit agreements and financial covenants which could result in our lender demanding immediate repayment of our loans. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at September 30, 2022. Current management projections indicate that we will be in compliance with our loan covenants through September 30, 2023. However, unforeseen circumstances may develop which could result in violations of our loan covenants. If we violate the terms of our credit agreement, our primary lender could deem us in default of our loans and require us to immediately repay any outstanding balance of our loans.

Our inability to maintain or secure credit facilities we may require in the future may negatively impact our liquidity. While we do not currently require more financing than we have, in the future we may need additional financing. If we require financing in the future and we are unable to secure such financing, or we are unable to secure the financing we require on reasonable terms, it may have a negative impact on our liquidity. This could negatively impact the value of our units.

We depend on our management and key employees, and the loss of these relationships could negatively impact our ability to operate profitably. We are highly dependent on our management team to operate our ethanol plant. We may not be able to replace these individuals should they decide to cease their employment with us, or if they become unavailable for any other reason. While we seek to compensate our management and key employees in a manner that will encourage them to continue their employment with us, they may choose to seek other employment. Any loss of these officers and key employees may prevent us from operating the ethanol plant profitably and could decrease the value of our units.

We are subject to global and regional economic downturns, inflation, rising interest rates and related risks. Our business is affected by global and regional demographic and macroeconomic conditions. A significant downturn in global economic growth, or recessionary conditions in major geographic regions for prolonged periods, may lead to a variety of adverse consequences for our business including reduced demand for our products, increases in our corn and natural gas costs and rising interest rates on our variable rate loans. These and other adverse consequences could result in our inability to operate profitably and reduce our earnings. 

The effects of COVID-19 or another pandemic may continue to materially and adversely affect demand and the market price for our products. In December 2019, a novel coronavirus surfaced in Wuhan, China (“COVID-19”).  The spread of COVID-19 worldwide resulted in businesses suspending or substantially curtailing global operations and travel, quarantines, and an overall substantial slowdown of economic activity. Transportation fuels in particular, including ethanol, experienced significant price declines and reduced demand. The effects of COVID-19 have and may continue to materially and adversely affect the market price for our products, our business, results of operations and liquidity.

COVID-19 or another pandemic may have lasting effects on our ability to operate our business which could decrease or eliminate the value of our units. COVID-19 affected many businesses, including ours and may continue to negatively impact our operations in the future.  We may experience labor shortages if our employees are unable or unwilling to come to work.  If our suppliers cannot deliver the supplies we need to operate our business or if we are unable to ship our products due to trucking or rail shipping disruptions, we may be forced to suspend operations or reduce production.  If we are unable to operate the ethanol plant at capacity, it may result in unfavorable operating results.  Any shut down of operations or reduction in production, especially for an extended period of time, could reduce or eliminate the value of our units. 

The invasion of Ukraine by Russia and resulting sanctions by the United States, European Union and other countries have contributed to inflation, market disruptions and increased volatility in commodity prices in the United States and a slowdown in global economic growth. On February 24, 2022, a full-scale military invasion of Ukraine by Russian troops was reported. In response to the attacks on Ukraine, sanctions and other penalties have been levied by the United States, European Union and other countries and additional sanctions and penalties have been proposed. The invasion by Russia and resulting sanctions have had a broad range of adverse impacts on global business and financial markets some of which have had and may continue to have adverse impacts on our business. These include increased inflation, significant market disruptions and increased volatility in commodity prices such as corn, oil and natural gas. Although the duration and extent of the ongoing military conflict is highly unpredictable and the magnitude of the potential economic impact is currently unknown, Russian military actions and resulting sanctions could have a negative effect on our financial condition and operating results.

Risks Related to our Trading Division

Our Trading Division business is affected by the supply and demand of commodities, and is sensitive to factors outside of our control. Adverse price movements could negatively affect our profitability and results of operations.  Our Trading Division buys, sells and holds inventories of agricultural commodities, some of which are readily traded on commodity futures exchanges. Unfavorable weather conditions, both local and worldwide, as well as other factors beyond our control, can affect the supply and demand of these commodities and expose us to liquidity pressures to finance hedges in the grain business
16

Table of Contents

in rapidly rising markets. Increased costs of inventory and prices of raw material would decrease our profit margins and adversely affect our results of operations. While we attempt to manage the risk associated with commodity price changes for our grain inventory positions with derivative instruments, including purchase and sale contracts, we are unable to offset 100% of the price risk of each transaction due to timing, availability of futures and options contracts and third-party credit risk. Furthermore, there is a risk that the derivatives we employ will not be effective in offsetting all of the risks that we are trying to manage. This can happen when the derivative and the underlying value of grain inventories and purchase and sale contracts are not perfectly matched. Our grain derivatives, for example, do not perfectly correlate with the basis component of our grain inventory and contracts. (Basis is defined as the difference between the local cash price of a commodity and the corresponding exchange-traded futures price.) Differences can reflect time periods, locations or product forms. Although the basis component is smaller and generally less volatile than the futures component of our grain market price, basis moves on a large grain position can significantly impact the profitability of the Trading Division. Our futures, options and over-the-counter contracts are subject to margin calls. If there are large movements in the commodities market, we could be required to post significant levels of margin, which would impact our liquidity. There is no assurance that the efforts we have taken to mitigate the impact of the volatility of the prices of commodities upon which we rely will be successful and any sudden change in the price of these commodities could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

    We face intense competition in our Trading Division. We face significant competition in our Trading Division and we have numerous competitors, some of which are larger and have greater financial resources than we have. Competition could cause us to lose market share and talented employees, exit certain lines of business, increase marketing or other expenditures or reduce pricing, each of which could have an adverse effect on our business and profitability.

    Our Trading Division uses derivative contracts to reduce volatility in the commodity markets. Non-performance by the counter-parties to those contracts could adversely affect our future results of operations and financial position. A significant amount of our commodity purchases and sales are done through forward contracting. In addition, we use exchange traded and to a lesser degree over-the-counter contracts to reduce volatility in changing commodity prices. A significant adverse change in commodity prices could cause a counter-party to one or more of our derivative contracts to not perform on their obligation.

    If a substantial portion of our inventory becomes damaged or obsolete, its value would decrease and our profit margins would suffer. We may carry significant amounts of inventory in our Trading Division. The value of our inventories could decrease due to deterioration in the quality of our grain inventory due to damage, moisture, insects, disease or foreign material. If the quality of our grain were to deteriorate below an acceptable level, the value of our inventory could decrease significantly.  
Risks Related to our Ethanol Division
Declines in the price of ethanol or distillers grain would significantly reduce our revenues. The sales prices of ethanol and distillers grains can be volatile as a result of a number of factors such as overall supply and demand, the price of gasoline and corn, levels of government support, and the availability and price of competing products. We are dependent on a favorable spread between the price we receive for our ethanol and distillers grains and the price we pay for corn and natural gas. Any lowering of ethanol and distillers grains prices, especially if it is associated with increases in corn and natural gas prices, may affect our ability to operate profitably. We anticipate the price of ethanol and distillers grains to continue to be volatile in our 20182023 fiscal year as a result of the net effect of changes in the price of gasoline and corn and increased ethanol supply offset by increased export demand. In addition, growing conditions in a particular season’s harvest may cause the corn crop to be of poor quality resulting in corn shortages and a decrease in distillers grains prices. Declines in the prices we receive for our ethanol and distillers grains will lead to decreased revenues and may result in our inability to operate the ethanol plant profitably for an extended period of time which could decrease the value of our units.


Increases in the price of corn or natural gas would reduce our profitability.Our primary source of revenue is from the sale of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. Our results of operations and financial condition are significantly affected by the cost and supply of corn and natural gas. Changes in the price and supply of corn and natural gas are subject to and determined by market forces over which we have no control including weather and general economic factors.


Ethanol production requires substantial amounts of corn. Generally, higher corn prices will produce lower profit margins and, therefore, negatively affect our financial performance. If a period of high corn prices were to be sustained for some time, such pricing may reduce our ability to operate profitably because of the higher cost of operating our plant. We may not be able to offset any increase in the price of corn by increasing the price of our products. If we cannot offset increases in the price of corn, our financial performance may be negatively affected.


17

Table of Contents

The prices for and availability of natural gas are subject to volatile market conditions.  These market conditions often are affected by factors beyond our control such as higher prices as a result of colder than average weather conditions or natural disasters, overall economic conditions and foreign and domestic governmental regulations and relations.  Significant disruptions in the supply of natural gas could impair our ability to manufacture ethanol and more significantly, distillers grains for our customers.  Furthermore, increases in natural gas prices or changes in our natural gas costs relative to natural gas costs paid by competitors may adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition. We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of corn and natural gas through the use of hedging instruments.  However, these hedging transactions also involve risks to our business.  See “Risks Relating to Our Business - We engage in hedging transactions which involve risks that could harm our business.” If we were to experience relatively higher corn and natural gas costs compared to the selling prices of our products for an extended period of time, the value of our units may be reduced.

We may violate the terms of our credit agreements and financial covenants which could result in our lender demanding immediate repayment of our loans. We were in compliance with all financial covenants at September 30, 2017. Current management projections indicate that we will be in compliance with our loan covenants through September 30, 2018. However, unforeseen circumstances may develop which could result in us violating our loan covenants. If we violate the terms of our credit agreement, our primary lender could deem us in default of our loans and require us to immediately repay any outstanding balance of our loans.

Our inability to maintain or secure credit facilities we may require in the future may negatively impact our liquidity. While we do not currently require more financing than we have, in the future we may need additional financing. If we require financing in the future and we are unable to secure such financing, or we are unable to secure the financing we require on reasonable terms, it may have a negative impact on our liquidity. This could negatively impact the value of our units.


14

Table of Contents



We engage in hedging transactions which involve risks that could harm our business.  We are exposed to market risk from changes in commodity prices.  Exposure to commodity price risk results from our dependence on corn and natural gas in the ethanol production process.process along with ethanol sales prices.  We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of corn, natural gas and ethanol through the use of hedging instruments.  The effectiveness of our hedging strategies is dependent on the price of corn, natural gas and ethanol and our ability to sell sufficient products to use all of the corn and natural gas for which we have futures contracts.  Our hedging activities may not successfully reduce the risk caused by price fluctuation which may leave us vulnerable to high corn and natural gas prices. Alternatively, we may choose not to engage in hedging transactions in the future and our operations and financial conditions may be adversely affected during periods in which corn and/or natural gas prices increase. Utilizing cash for margin calls has an impact on the cash we have available for our operations which could result in liquidity problems during times when corn prices rise or fall significantly.

Price movements in corn, natural gas and ethanol contracts are highly volatile and are influenced by many factors that are beyond our control.  There are several variables that could affect the extent to which our derivative instruments are impacted by price fluctuations in the cost of corn, or natural gas.gas and ethanol.  However, it is likely that commodity cash prices will have the greatest impact on the derivatives instruments with delivery dates nearest the current cash price.  We may incur such costs and they may be significant which could impact our ability to profitably operate the plant and may reduce the value of our units.
 
Our businessEthanol Division is not diversified.  Our  While we do procure, transport and sell grain commodities through our Trading Division, our success depends largely on our ability to profitably operate our ethanol plant. We do not have any other signficiantsignificant sources of revenue if we are unable to operate our ethanol plant and manufacture ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil and carbon dioxide or if economic or political factors adversely affect the market for ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil or carbon dioxide. Our business would also be significantly harmed if the ethanol plant could not operate at full capacity for any extended period of time.

We depend on our management and key employees, and the loss of these relationships could negatively impact our ability to operate profitably. We are highly dependent on our management team to operate our ethanol plant. We may not be able to replace these individuals should they decide to cease their employment with us, or if they become unavailable for any other reason. While we seek to compensate our management and key employees in a manner that will encourage them to continue their employment with us, they may choose to seek other employment. Any loss of these officers and key employees may prevent us from operating the ethanol plant profitably and could decrease the value of our units.

We are subject to litigation involving our corn oil extraction technology. We have been sued by GS CleanTech Corporation asserting its intellectual property rights to certain corn oil extraction processes we obtained from ICM, Inc. in August 2008. GS CleanTech is seeking to enforce its patent rights against ICM and the Company. The court ruled that all of the patents claimed by GS CleanTech were invalid, that the Company had not infringed and that the patents were invalid due to inequitable conduct before the US Patent and Trademark Office by the inventors and their attorneys. However, these rulings are subject to appeal. If GS CleanTech is successful in its appeal and allowed to continue to pursue its claims against the Company, we may be forced to pay damages to GS CleanTech as a result of our use of such technology and cease our production of corn oil.
Risks Related to Ethanol Industry

The ethanol industry is an industry that is changing rapidly which can result in unexpected developments that could negatively impact our operations and the value of our units. The ethanol industry has grown significantly in the last decade. This rapid growth has resulted in significant shifts in supply and demand of ethanol over a very short period of time. As a result, past performance by the ethanol plant or the ethanol industry generally might not be indicative of future performance. We may experience a rapid shift in the economic conditions in the ethanol industry which may make it difficult to operate the ethanol plant profitably. If changes occur in the ethanol industry that make it difficult for us to operate the ethanol plant profitably, it could result in a reduction in the value of our units.

Changes and advances in ethanol production technology could require us to incurcosts to update our plant or could otherwise hinder our ability tocompete in the ethanol industry or operate profitably.  Advances and changes in the technology of ethanol production are expected to occur.  Such advances and changes may make the ethanol production technology installed in our plant less desirable or obsolete.  These advances could also allow our competitors to produce ethanol at a lower cost than we are able.  If we are unable to adopt or incorporate technological advances, our ethanol production methods and processes could be less efficient than our competitors, which could cause our plant to become uncompetitivenoncompetitive or completely obsolete.  If our competitors develop, obtain or license technology that is superior to ours or that makes our technology obsolete, we may be required to incur significant costs to enhance or acquire new technology so that our ethanol production remains competitive.  Alternatively, we may be required to seek third-party licenses, which could also result in significant expenditures.  These third-party licenses may not be available or, once obtained, they may not continue to be available on commercially reasonable terms.  These costs could negatively impact our financial performance by increasing our operating costs and reducing our net income.

15

Table of Contents



Decreasing gasoline prices could negatively impact our ability to operate profitably. Discretionary blending is an important secondary market which is often determined by the price of ethanol versus the price of gasoline. In periods when discretionary blending is financially unattractive, the demand for ethanol may be reduced. Lower gasoline prices reduce the
18

Table of Contents

spread between the price of gasoline and the price of ethanol which can discourage discretionary blending, dampen the export market and result in a downwards market adjustment in the price of ethanol. If oil and gasoline prices were to remain lowdecrease for a significant period of time, it could hurt our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant which could decrease the value of our units.

Demand for ethanol may not continue to grow unless ethanol can be blended into gasoline in higher percentage blends for conventional automobiles. Currently, ethanol is blended with conventional gasoline for use in standard (non-flex fuel) vehicles to create a blend which is 10% ethanol and 90% conventional gasoline. In order to expand demand for ethanol, higher percentage blends of ethanol must be utilized in conventional automobiles. Such higher percentage blends of ethanol have become a contentious issue with automobile manufacturers and environmental groups having fought against higher percentage ethanol blends. E15 is a blend which is 15% ethanol and 85% conventional gasoline. Although there have been significant developments towards the availability of E15 in the marketplace, there are still obstacles tothat could inhibit meaningful market penetration by E15. As a result, the approval of E15 may not significantly increase demand for ethanol.

Technology advances in the commercialization of cellulosic ethanol may decrease demand for corn based ethanol which may negatively affect our profitability. Ethanol production research has worked to develop an efficient method of producing ethanol from cellulose-based biomass, such as agricultural waste, forest residue, municipal solid waste, and energy crops. Cellulose-based biomass is generally cheaper than corn, and producing ethanol from cellulose-based biomass would create opportunities to produce ethanol in areas which are unable to grow corn. The Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 and the 2008 Farm Bill offer a very strong incentive to develop commercial scale cellulosic ethanol. The statutory volume requirement in the RFS requires that 16 billion gallons per year of advanced bio-fuels be consumed in the United States by 2022. Some companies have reportedly produced cellulosic ethanol on a commercial scale and other companies have begun construction on commercial scale cellulosic ethanol plants. If an efficient method of producing ethanol from cellulose-based biomass is developed, we may not be able to compete effectively. If we are unable to produce ethanol as cost-effectively as cellulose-based producers, our ability to generate revenue and our financial condition will be negatively impacted.


Decreasing ethanol prices could reduce our ability to operate profitably. Decreases in the price of ethanol reduce our revenue. Our profitability depends on a favorable spread between our corn and natural gas costs and the price we receive for our ethanol. If ethanol prices fall during times when corn and/or natural gas prices are high, we may not be able to operate our ethanol plant profitably.


If a substantial portion of our corn inventory becomes damaged or obsolete, its value would decrease and our profit margins would suffer. We may carry significant amounts of corn inventory in our Ethanol Division. The value of our inventories could decrease due to deterioration in the quality of our inventory due to damage, moisture, insects, disease or foreign material. If the quality of our corn inventory were to deteriorate below an acceptable level, the value of our inventory could decrease significantly.  

We operate in an intensely competitive industry and compete with larger, better financed entities which could impact our ability to operate profitably.  There is significant competition among ethanol producers. There are numerous producer-owned and privately-owned ethanol plants planned and operating throughout the Midwest and elsewhere in the United States.  In addition, we have seen increased competition from oil companies who have purchased ethanol production facilities. We also face competition from outside of the United States. The largest ethanol producers include Archer Daniels Midland, Flint Hill Resources LP, Green Plains Renewable Energy, POET Biorefining and Valero Renewable Fuels, alleach of which are eachis capable of producing significantly more ethanol than we produce. Further, many believe that there will be further consolidation occurring in the ethanol industry in the future which will likely lead to a few companies which control a significant portion of the ethanol production market. We may not be able to compete with these larger entities. These larger ethanol producers may be able to affect the ethanol market in ways that are not beneficial to us which could affect our financial performance. 
 
Competition from the advancement of alternative fuels may lessen the demand forethanol.  Alternative fuels, gasoline oxygenates and ethanol production methods are continually under development. Like ethanol, these emerging technologies offer an option to address worldwide energy costs, the long-term availability of petroleum reserves and environmental concerns. If these alternative technologies continue to expand and gain broad acceptance and become readily available to consumers for motor vehicle use, we may not be able to compete effectively. This additional competition could reduce the demand for ethanol, resulting in lower ethanol prices that might adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition.
 
Increased use of fuel cells, plug-in hybrids and electric cars may lessen the demand for ethanol. A number of automotive,Automotive, industrial and power generation manufacturers are developinghave developed alternative clean power systems using fuel cells, plug-in hybrids, electric cars or clean burning gaseous fuels. Electric car technology has recently grown in popularity, especially in urban areas, which has led to an increase in recharging stations which may makehas made electric car technology more widely available in the future.available. This additional competition from alternate sources could reduce the demand for ethanol, resulting in lower ethanol prices which could negatively impact our results of operations and financial condition.



16
19

Table of Contents




Consumer resistance to the use of ethanol based on the belief that ethanol isexpensive, uses too much corn, adds to air pollution, harms engines and/or takes more energy toproduce than it contributes may affect the demand for ethanol.  Certain individuals believe that the use of ethanol will have a negative impact on gasoline prices at the pump and that ethanol uses too much of the available corn supply. Many also believe that ethanol adds to air pollution and harms car and truck engines. Still other consumers believe that the process of producing ethanol actually uses more fossil energy, such as oil and natural gas, than the amount of energy that is produced. These consumer beliefs could potentially be wide-spread and may be increasing as a result of recent efforts to increase the allowable percentage of ethanol that may be blended for use in conventional automobiles. If consumers choose not to buy ethanol based on these beliefs, it would affect the demand for the ethanol we produce which could negatively affect our profitability and financial condition.


Risks Related to Regulation and Governmental Action
    
Government incentives for ethanol production may be eliminated in the future, which could hinder our ability to operate at aprofit. The ethanol industry is assisted by various federal ethanol production and tax incentives, including the RFS set forth in the Energy Policy Act of 2005. The RFS helps support a market for ethanol that might disappear without this incentive.
The United States Environmental Protection Agency ("EPA") has the authority to waive the RFS statutory volume requirement, in whole or in part, provided certain conditions have been met. Annually,In addition, the EPA is supposedexpanded its use of waivers to pass a rule that establishessmall refineries allowing those refineries to avoid their ethanol use requirements under the number of gallons of different types of renewable fuels that must be usedRFS resulting in the United States which is called the renewable volume obligations. In the past, the EPA has set the renewable volume obligations below the statutory volume requirements. On May 18, 2017, the EPA released a proposed rule to set the 2018 total volume obligation at 19.24 billion gallons of which 15.0 billion gallon could be met by corn-based ethanol. The final rule is expected to be issued in November 2017.decreased ethanol demand. If the EPA were to significantly reduce the volume requirements under the RFS or if the RFS were to be otherwise reduced or eliminated by the exercise of the EPA waiver authority or by Congress, the market price and demand for ethanol could decrease which will negatively impact our financial performance.


A reduction    Government policies and regulations, particularly those affecting the agricultural sector and related industries, could adversely affect our operations and profitability.  Agricultural commodity production and trade flows are significantly affected by government policies and regulations. Governmental policies affecting the agricultural industry, such as taxes, tariffs, duties, subsidies, import and export restrictions on agricultural commodities and commodity products can influence industry profitability, the planting of certain crops versus other uses of agricultural resources, the location and size of crop production, whether unprocessed or processed commodity products are traded and the volume and types of imports and exports. In addition, international trade disputes can adversely affect agricultural commodity trade flows by limiting or disrupting trade between countries or regions. Future governmental policies, regulations or actions affecting our industry may adversely affect the supply of, demand for and prices of our products, restrict our ability to do business and cause our financial results to suffer.

    Reductions in distillers grains exports to China could have a negative effect on the price of distillers grains in the U.S. and could negatively affect our profitability. China iswas the world's largest buyer of distillers grains produced in the United States. On January 12, 2016, the Chinese government began an antidumpinganti-dumping and countervailing duty investigation related to distillers grains imported from the United States which contributed to a decline in distillers grains shipped to China. China began imposing anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties during 2016 as a result of a preliminary ruling on its investigation. On January 10, 2017, China announced a final ruling related to its anti-dumping and countervailing duty investigation imposing anti-dumping duties from a range of 42.2% to 53.7% and anti-subsidy duties from 11.2% to 12.0%. The imposition of these duties havehas resulted in a significant decline in demand from this top importer and negatively impacted prices for distillers grains produced in the United States. This reduction in demand could negatively impact our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant.
    
A reduction    Reductions in ethanol exports to China due to the imposition of a tariff on U.S. ethanol have a negative impact on ethanol prices. China imposed a tariff on ethanol which is produced in the United States and exported to China which has negatively impacted exports of ethanol to China. The decrease could negatively impact the market price of ethanol in the United States and our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant.

    Reductions in ethanol exports to Brazil due to the imposition by the Brazilian government of a tariff on U.S. ethanol could have a negative impact on ethanol prices. Brazil haswas historically been a top destination for ethanol produced in the United States. However, earlier this year, Brazil imposed a tariff on ethanol which is produced in the United States and exported to Brazil. ThisThe tariff has resulted in a decline in demand for ethanol from Brazil and could negatively impact the market price of ethanol in the United States and our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant.

A The tariff was temporarily suspended in March 2022 through the end of the year following a 10% reduction in ethanol exports to Europe due to the imposition bytariff in November of 2021 but the European Union of a tariff on U.S. ethanol could have a negative impact on ethanol prices. The European Union imposed a five-year tariff on ethanol which is producedmay be reimplemented in the United States and exported to Europe which has negatively impacted exports of ethanol to Europe. The decrease could negatively impact the market price of ethanol in the United States and our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant.future.


Changes in environmental regulations or violations of these regulations could beexpensive and reduce our profitability.  We are subject to extensive air, water and other environmental laws and regulations.  In addition, some of these laws require our plant to operate under a number of environmental permits. These laws, regulations and permits can often
20

Table of Contents

require expensive pollution control equipment or operational changes to limit actual or potential impacts to the environment.  A violation of these laws and regulations or permit conditions can result in substantial fines, damages, criminal sanctions, permit revocations and/or plant shutdowns.  In the future, we may be subject to legal actions brought by environmental advocacy groups and other parties for actual or alleged violations of environmental laws or our permits.  Additionally, any changes in environmental laws and regulations, both at the federal and state level, could require us to spend considerable resources in order to comply with future environmental regulations. The expense of compliance could be significant enough to reduce our profitability and negatively affect our financial condition.
    

17

Table of Contents



The California Low Carbon Fuel Standard may decrease demand for corn based ethanol which could negatively impact our profitability. California passed a Low Carbon Fuels Standard ("LCFS") which requires that renewable fuels used in California must accomplish certain reductions in greenhouse gases which reductions are measured using a lifecycle analysis. Management believes that these regulations could preclude corn based ethanol produced in the Midwest from being used in California. California represents a significant ethanol demand market. If the ethanol industry is unable to supply corn based ethanol to California, it could significantly reduce demand for the ethanol we produce. This could result in a reduction of our revenues and could negatively impact our ability to profitably operate the ethanol plant.
    
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES


Our plant site is made up of two adjacent parcels which together total approximately 295 acres in east central Indiana near Union City, Indiana. The address of our plant is 1554 N. County Road 600 E., Union City, Indiana 47390. On October 31, 2016, we purchased approximately 64 acres of land adjacent to our property for a total purchase price of approximately $646,000.
In November 2008, the plant was substantially completed and plant operations commenced. The plant consists of the following buildings:


A grains area, fermentation area, distillation - evaporation area;
A dryer/energy center area;
A tank farm;
An auxiliary area; and
An administration building.


Our plant is in excellent condition and is capable of functioning at over 100% of its 100 million gallons per year nameplate production capacity.


In September 2017, we completed a construction project to add grain receiving and train loading facilities and additional rail spurs, track and grain storage to allow us to procure, transport and sell grain commodities.

All of our tangible and intangible property, real and personal, serves as the collateral for the debt financing with First National Bank of Omaha, which is described below under "Item 7 - Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."


ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Patent Infringement


On June 27, 2008, we entered into a Tricanter Purchase and Installation Agreement with ICM, Inc. for the construction and installation of a Tricanter Oil Separation System. On February 12, 2010, GS CleanTech Corporation ("GS CleanTech") filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana, claiming that the Company'sCardinal's operation of the oil recovery system manufactured and installed by ICM, Inc. infringes a patent claimed by GS CleanTech. GS CleanTech sought royalties and damages associated with the alleged infringement, as well as attorney's fees from the Company. GS CleanTech subsequently filed actions against at least fourteen other ethanol producing companiesothers for infringement of its patent rights, adding several additional patents. GS CleanTechpatents and successfully petitioned for the cases to be joined in a multi-district litigation ("MDL") which was assignedlitigation. ICM, Inc. agreed to indemnify Cardinal and defend the United States District Court for the Southern District of Indiana (Case No. 1:10-ml-02181). We subsequently answered and counterclaimed that the patent claimslawsuit at issue are invalid and that the Company is not infringing.

Motions for summary judgment were filed by the defendants, including the Company, and GS CleanTech. Meanwhile, GS Cleantech filed suit against another group of defendants which were joined with the MDL.no expense to Cardinal. On October 23, 2014, the United States District Court (the "Court") granted summary judgment finding that all of the patents claimed by GS CleanTech were invalid and that the CompanyCardinal had not infringed. In addition, on September 15, 2016, the United States District Court granted summary judgment finding that the patents were invalid due to inequitable conduct before the US Patent and Trademark Office by the inventors and their attorneys. GS Cleantech has askedThese rulings were subsequently affirmed on appeal and on February 22, 2021, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the decision. On March 3, 2022, the United States District Court to reconsider its decision regarding inequitable conduct. In addition, GS Cleantech and its attorneys filed a Notice of Appeal appealing the rulingsruled on summary judgment.

On February 16, 2010, ICM, Inc. agreed to indemnify the Company from and against all claims, demands, liabilities, actions, litigations, losses, damages, costs and expenses, including reasonable attorney'sattorney fees arising out of any claim of infringement of patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights by reason of our purchase and use of the oil recovery system and agrees to defend the Company. Several of the other defendants also use equipment and processes provided by ICM, Inc. ICM, Inc. has, and we expect it will continue, to vigorously defend itself and the Company in this lawsuit and in any appeal filed by GS CleanTech. If GS CleanTech were to be successful in any appeal filed and allowedawarded to continue to pursue its claims, we estimate that damages, if awarded, would be basedthe defendants. A supplemental award of attorney fees was issued on a reasonable royalty to, or lost profits of, GS CleanTech. Because of its rulings, it seems unlikelyAugust 10, 2022.



18
21

Table of Contents




that the District Court would deem the case exceptional. However, in the event it would be deemed to be exceptional, attorney's fees may be awarded and are likely to be $1,000,000 or more. ICM, Inc. has also agreed to indemnify us. However, in the event that damages were to be awarded, if ICM, Inc. does not fully indemnify us for any reason, we could be liable and could also be required to cease use of our oil separation process and seek out a replacement or cease oil production altogether.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


None.


PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED MEMBER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
    
Market for ourOur Units


As of November 22, 2017,December 1, 2022, we had approximately 14,606 membership units outstanding and approximately 1,1111,058 unit holders of record. There is no public trading market for our units. However, we have established through FNC Ag Stock, LLC a Unit Trading Bulletin Board, a private online matching service, in order to facilitate trading among our members.  The Unit Trading Bulletin Board has been designed to comply with federal tax laws and IRS regulations establishing an “alternative trading service,” as well as state and federal securities laws.  Our Unit Trading Bulletin Board consists of an electronic bulletin board that provides a list of interested buyers with a list of interested sellers, along with their non-firm price quotes.  The Unit Trading Bulletin Board does not automatically affectfacilitates matches between potential sellers and buyers and it isassists the sole responsibility of sellers and buyers to contact each other to make a determination as to whether an agreement to transfer units may be reached.with transfers.  We do not become involved in any purchase or sale negotiations arising from our Unit Trading Bulletin Board and have no role in effecting the transactions beyond approval, as required under our operating agreement, and the issuance of new certificates.  We do not give advice regarding the merits or shortcomings of any particular transaction.  We do not receive, transfer or hold funds or securities as an incident of operating the Unit Trading Bulletin Board.  We do not receive any compensation for creating or maintaining the Unit Trading Bulletin Board.  In advertising our alternative trading service, we do not characterize Cardinal as being a broker or dealer or an exchange.  We do not use the Unit Trading Bulletin Board to offer to buy or sell securities other than in compliance with the securities laws, including any applicable registration requirements.
 
There are detailed timelines that must be followed under the Unit Trading Bulletin Board Rules and Procedures with respect to offers and sales of membership units.  All transactions must comply with the Unit Trading Bulletin Board Rules, our operating agreement, and are subject to approval by our board of directors.


As a limited liability company, we are required to restrict the transfers of our membership units in order to preserve our partnership tax status. Our membership units may not be traded on any established securities market or readily traded on a secondary market (or the substantial equivalent thereof). All transfers are subject to a determination that the transfer will not cause the Company to be deemed a publicly traded partnership.


The following table contains historical information by fiscal quarter for the past two fiscal years regarding the actual unit transactions that were completed by our unit-holders during the periods specified. We believe this most accurately represents the current trading value of the Company's units. The information was compiled by reviewing the completed unit transfers that occurred on our qualified matching service bulletin board during the quarters indicated.
Selling Quarter Low Price High Price Average Price 
# of
Units Traded
2016 1st
 $10,750
 $12,500
 $11,772
 31
2016 2nd
 $11,000
 $12,500
 $11,833
 12
2016 3rd 
 $12,500
 $13,000
 $12,659
 6
2016 4th 
 $13,260
 $14,521
 $13,807
 25
2017 1st 
 $13,500
 $15,150
 $13,807
 38
2017 2nd 
 $14,000
 $15,000
 $14,363
 41
2017 3rd 
 $14,000
 $15,100
 $14,815
 42
2017 4th 
 $15,500
 $15,600
 $15,591
 22
Selling QuarterLow PriceHigh PriceAverage Price# of
Units Traded
2021 1st
$5,000 $5,127 $5,038 143 
2021 2nd
$5,250 $7,000 $5,517 85 
2021 3rd
$5,940 $7,500 $6,790 76 
2021 4th
$7,301 $8,550 $8,040 28 
2022 1st
$8,750 $10,360 $9,691 40 
2022 2nd
$10,000 $13,950 $11,934 56 
2022 3rd
$11,665 $12,500 $12,085 19 
2022 4th
$12,000 $15,500 $13,862 45 
 

19

Table of Contents



The following table contains the bid and asked prices that were posted on the Company's alternative trading service bulletin board and includes some transactions that were not completed. The Company believes the table above more accurately describes the trading value of its units as the bid and asked prices below include some offers that never resulted in completed transactions. The information was compiled by reviewing postings that were made on the Company's alternative trading service bulletin board.
22

Table of Contents

Listing Quarter Low Price High Price Average Price 
# of
Units Listed
2016 1st
 $10,750
 $12,500
 $11,838
 51
2016 2nd
 $11,000
 $12,500
 $11,833
 12
2016 3rd 
 $12,500
 $13,000
 $12,659
 6
2016 4th
 $13,260
 $14,521
 $13,807
 25
2017 1st 
 $13,500
 $15,150
 $14,236
 43
2017 2nd 
 $14,000
 $15,500
 $14,459
 52
2017 3rd 
 $14,000
 $15,500
 $15,166
 86
2017 4th 
 $15,400
 $17,000
 $16,000
 47
Listing QuarterLow PriceHigh PriceAverage Price# of
Units Listed
2021 1st
$— $— $— — 
2021 2nd
$11,000 $11,000 $11,000 10 
2021 3rd
$12,000 $12,000 $12,000 10 
2021 4th
$7,400 $10,000 $9,033 12 
2022 1st
$12,000 $18,500 $12,250 
2022 2nd
$18,500 $18,500 $18,500 
2022 3rd
$— $— $— — 
2022 4th
$15,450 $21,000 $16,444 172 

Distributions


During our fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we made the following distributions to our members:

Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution Paid
November 15, 2016 $600
 $8,763,600
 December 2016
February 14, 2017 200
 2,921,200
 February 2017
May 16, 2017 275
 4,016,650
 May 2017
August 14, 2017 100
 1,460,600
 August 2017
Totals $1,175
 $17,162,050
  

During our fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, we made the following distributions to our members:
Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution Paid
November 17, 2015 $500
 $7,303,000
 November 2015
February 9, 2016 300
 4,381,800
 February 2016
May 17, 2016 230
 3,359,380
 June 2016
August 16, 2016 600
 8,763,601
 August 2016
Totals $1,630
 $23,807,781
  

Our board of directors has complete discretion over the timing and amount of distributions to our members. Our expectations with respect to our ability to make future distributions are discussed in greater detail in "Item 7 - ManagementManagement's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations."


Performance Graph


The following graph shows a comparison of cumulative total member return since September 30, 2012,2017, calculated on a dividend reinvested basis, for the Company, the NASDAQ Composite Index (the “NASDAQ”“Composite”) and an index of other companies that have the same SIC code as the CompanyNASDAQ Clean Edge Green Energy Index (the “Industry Index”"CELS"). The graph assumes $100 was invested in each of our units, the NASDAQ,Composite and the Industry IndexCELS on September 30, 2012.2017. Data points on the graph are annual. Note that historic unit price performance is not necessarily indicative of future unit price performance.



card-20220930_g1.jpg
20
23

Table of Contents





Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, the performance graph and the information set forth therein shall not be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed to be incorporated by reference in any filing under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference in such a filing.



ITEM 6. [RESERVED]


21
24

Table of Contents




ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents selected financial and operating data as of the dates and for the periods indicated. The selected balance sheet financial data as of the year ended September 30, 2015, 2014 and 2013 and the selected income statement data and other financial data for the years ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 have been derived from our audited financial statements that are not included in this Form 10-K. The selected balance sheet financial data for the years ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and the selected income statement data and other financial data for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015 have been derived from the audited Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. You should read the following table in conjunction with "Item 7- Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and the financial statements and the accompanying notes included elsewhere in this Form 10-K. Among other things, those financial statements include more detailed information regarding the basis of presentation for the following financial data.

Statement of Operations Data: 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Revenues $228,496,827
 $222,895,449
 $240,695,293
 $337,355,515
 $357,611,814
           
Cost Goods Sold 209,241,617
 204,014,877
 197,305,291
 244,414,762
 324,122,396
           
Gross Profit 19,255,210
 18,880,572
 43,390,002
 92,940,753
 33,489,418
           
Operating Expenses 5,520,971
 5,233,634
 4,714,891
 4,945,382
 4,697,637
           
Operating Income 13,734,239
 13,646,938
 38,675,111
 87,995,371
 28,791,781
           
Other Income (Expense), Net (309,615) (125,143) 46,706
 (733,697) (2,436,357)
           
Net Income $13,424,624
 $13,521,795
 $38,721,817
 $87,261,674
 $26,355,424
           
Weighted Average Units Outstanding 14,606
 14,606
 14,606
 14,606
 14,606
           
Net Income Per Unit $919
 $926
 $2,651
 $5,974
 $1,804
           
Cash Distributions Per Unit $1,175
 $1,630
 $3,500
 $4,547
 $382
           
Balance Sheet Data: 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Current Assets $50,139,370
 $48,529,843
 $48,646,801
 $60,034,736
 $57,914,023
           
Net Property and Equipment 107,936,389
 104,461,078
 107,998,425
 105,632,776
 110,311,216
           
Other Assets 1,096,237
 938,251
 823,494
 718,553
 554,837
           
Total Assets 159,171,996
 153,929,172
 157,468,720
 166,386,065
 168,780,076
           
Current Liabilities 18,007,407
 11,676,852
 11,997,241
 13,380,637
 13,149,364
           
Long-Term Debt 14,581,758
 11,932,063
 4,865,236
 
 24,154,710
           
Members' Equity 126,582,831
 130,320,257
 140,606,243
 153,005,428
 131,476,002

* See Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for further discussion of our financial results.


22

Table of Contents



ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


Overview

We produce ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil at our plant located near Union City, Indiana. In addition, we procure, transport and sell grain commodities.

Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 20172022 and 20162021


The following table shows the results of our operations and the percentage of revenues, cost of goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our statement of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016:2021:

 20222021
Statement of Operations DataAmount%Amount%
Revenues$546,691,371 100.0 $404,002,166 100.0 
Cost of Goods Sold460,306,891 84.2 369,373,828 91.4 
Gross Profit86,384,480 15.8 34,628,338 8.6 
Operating Expenses8,083,150 1.5 7,179,061 1.8 
Operating Income78,301,330 14.3 27,449,277 6.8 
Other Income (Expense), net7,402,534 1.4 (339,399)(0.1)
Net Income$85,703,864 15.7 $27,109,878 6.7 
 2017 2016
Statement of Operations DataAmount % Amount %
Revenues$228,496,827
 100.0
 $222,895,449
 100.0
Cost of Goods Sold209,241,617
 91.6
 204,014,877
 91.5
Gross Profit19,255,210
 8.4
 18,880,572
 8.5
Operating Expenses5,520,971
 2.4
 5,233,634
 2.3
Operating Income13,734,239
 6.0
 13,646,938
 6.2
Other Expense, net(309,615) (0.1) (125,143) (0.1)
Net Income$13,424,624
 5.9
 $13,521,795
 6.1

Revenues


    We have two reportable segments-the Ethanol Division and the Trading Division. Our revenues from operations from our Ethanol Division come from three primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. Revenues from operations of our Trading Division are derived from procuring, transporting and selling grain commodities. Revenues in each division also include net gains or losses from derivatives related to products sold.

The following table shows the sources of our total revenue from the two segments and the approximate percentage of revenues to total revenues in our consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2022 and 2021:

20222021
Revenue:Amount% of Total RevenuesAmount% of Total Revenues
Ethanol division$451,720,815 82.6 %$328,245,934 81.2 %
Trading division94,970,556 17.4 75,756,232 18.8 
Total Revenue$546,691,371 100.0 %$404,002,166 100.0 %

Ethanol Division

    The following table shows the sources of our ethanol division revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016:2021:


20222021
Revenue SourceAmount% of RevenuesAmount% of Revenues
Ethanol Sales$359,726,018 79.6 %$251,922,325 76.7 %
Distillers Grains Sales63,798,998 14.2 57,818,038 17.7 
Corn Oil Sales27,656,525 6.1 17,966,544 5.5 
Carbon Dioxide Sales473,449 0.1 484,752 0.1 
Other Revenue65,825 — 54,275 — 
Total Revenues$451,720,815 100.0 %$328,245,934 100.0 %


25

 2017 2016
Revenue SourceAmount% of Revenues Amount% of Revenues
Ethanol Sales$188,860,886
82.7% $173,252,481
77.7%
Distillers Grains Sales30,886,518
13.5
 40,709,845
18.3
Corn Oil Sales8,010,124
3.5
 8,226,924
3.7
CO2 Sales481,893
0.2
 514,937
0.2
Other Revenue257,406
0.1
 191,262
0.1
Total Revenues$228,496,827
100% $222,895,449
100%
Table of Contents


Ethanol

Our revenues from ethanol increased for our fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to our fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.2021. This increase in revenues is primarily the result of a higher average price per gallon of ethanol sold and an increase in gallons of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021. Revenue also includes the net gains or losses from derivatives related to the commodities purchased.
    Our average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, was 36.2% higher than our average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the same period in 2021. An increase in foreign and domestic demand, shipping disruptions attributed to labor shortages, and higher corn and oil prices have contributed to higher ethanol market prices for the current period. These increases were partially offset by higher ethanol production levels in the industry due to positive operating margins. In addition, corn and oil prices decreased towards the end of the period primarily due to increasing concerns of an economic slowdown which had a negative effect on ethanol prices.

    Management believes that ethanol prices will continue to be influenced by corn and energy prices, shipping disruptions, inventory levels, and inflationary factors. If corn and oil prices further decrease that would likely contribute to lower ethanol prices. Industry over-production due to positive operating margins could also have a negative effect on ethanol prices unless foreign or domestic demand reduce inventory levels. In addition, the Russian invasion of Ukraine and resulting sanctions by the United States and other countries have led to significant market disruptions and volatility in commodity prices. The impact on ethanol prices of this volatility coupled with increasing signs of a global economic slowdown is difficult to predict.

    We experienced an increase in ethanol gallons sold of 4.9% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021 resulting primarily from increased ethanol production rates. We are currently operating at a rate of approximately 135 million gallons annually.  We have installed an ethanol recovery system which we expect will result in an increase in efficiencies allowing us to achieve higher ethanol production rates going forward. However, we expect this will likely be offset by temporary shutdowns of our plant from time to time during our 2023 fiscal year in connection with the installation of our high protein feed system which could result in an overall reduction in gallons of ethanol produced during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2023 as compared to the same period in 2022. In addition, management continues to monitor economic conditions carefully. If market conditions worsen affecting our ability to profitably operate the plant, we may be forced to reduce our ethanol production rate or even temporarily shut down ethanol production altogether.     
Distillers Grains

    Our revenues from distillers grains increased in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021. This increase in revenues is primarily the result of an increase in the average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016.
We experienced an increase in ethanol gallons sold of approximately 4.75% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 resulting primarily from increased ethanol production rates. We are currently operating at approximately 30% above our nameplate capacity. Management anticipates that the gallons of ethanol sold by our plant will increase for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 due to completion of various projects which are expected to increase our production capacity to approximately 135 million gallons.

Our average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 was approximately 4.17% higher than our average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the same period in 2016. Ethanol prices were higher during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 due to increased export demand which offset increased industry-wide production. In addition, lower corn, crude oil and gasoline prices during the 2016 fiscal year had a negative affect on ethanol prices for that period.

Management anticipates that ethanol prices will continue to change in relation to changes in corn and energy prices. If corn, crude oil and gasoline prices decrease, that could have a significant negative impact on the market price of ethanol and our profitability, particularly should ethanol stocks grow because of expansion of production capacity in the industry. A decline in ethanol exports due to the tariff imposed by Brazil on ethanol produced in the United States or other factors would also likely contribute to higher ethanol stocks unless additional demand could be created domestically through the used of higher blends. Finally, an increase in imports by the United States from Brazil would have a negative effect on ethanol prices.

23

Table of Contents



Distillers Grains

Our revenues from distillers grains decreased in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. This decrease in revenues is primarily the result of a decrease in the average market price per ton of distillers grains sold for the period ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016.2021.

    The average market price per ton of distillers grains sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 was approximately 25.00% lower than2022, increased by 11.8% compared to the average price per ton of distillers grains sold for the same period in 2016.2021. Distillers grains prices, while lower during the first three months of the period compared to 2021, have increased substantially since January 2022. This declineincrease in the market price of distillers grains is primarily due to increased industry-wide production alonghigher corn and soybean meal prices which resulted in end users seeking out distillers grains as the lower cost alternative.

    Management anticipates that distillers grains prices will continue to be affected by the price of corn and soybean meal. A plentiful corn crop in the fall or an oversupply of soybean meal could lead to lower corn and soybean prices having a negative effect on distillers grains prices. Trade disputes with lower exportforeign countries, such as China, will continue to have a negative effect on distillers grains prices unless additional demand duringcan be sustained from domestic or other foreign markets. In addition, the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine coupled with signs of a global economic slowdown on commodity prices is difficult to predict.

    We sold 1.3% less tons of distillers grains in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016 which has resulted2021 due to decreased distillers grains production rates during the fiscal year. This decrease can be attributed to a slightly lower yield for the period. An increase or decrease in ethanol production rates in the future would result in a decline in the price of distillers grains as a percentage of corn values. In addition, poor corn quality from the 2016 corn crop had a negative effect on the price of distillers grains during our 2017 fiscal year.

China has been a significant consumer of exported distillers grains particularly since December of 2014 following the resolution of a dispute related to China's objection to the presence of an unapproved genetically modified organism in some U.S. shipments. However, an anti-dumping investigation beginning in January of 2016 into distillers grains produced in the United States led to the imposition by China of preliminary anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties on imports of ethanol produced in the United States in the fall of 2016 and a final ruling imposing even higher duties in January 2017. The investigation and imposition of these duties have resulted in a decline in demand from China and distillers grains prices could remain low unless additional demand can be created from domestic or other foreign markets such as Vietnam, a nation that recently resumed imports of distillers grains from the United States after a nine-month ban. Domestic demand for distillers grains could also decrease due to expansion of production capacity in the ethanol industry or if lower corn prices result in end-users switching to lower priced alternatives. In addition, growing conditions in a particular season’s harvest may cause corn crop to be of poor quality resulting in lower distillers grains prices. 
We experienced an increase of approximately 1.54%corresponding change in distillers grains tons soldproduction.


26

Table of Contents

Corn Oil

    Our revenues from corn oil sales increased by 53.9% in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016 due primarily to timing2021 which was mainly the result of shipments. Management anticipates thatan increase in the gallonsaverage price per pound of ethanolcorn oil sold by our plant will increase for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 due to completion of various projects which are expected to increase our ethanol production capacity to approximately 135 million gallons which would also increase our distillers grains production.

Corn Oil

Our revenues from corn oil sales decreased by approximately 2.64% in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016 which was primarily a result of a decrease of gallons of corn oil sold in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016. We sold approximately 10.29% less corn oil in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017 as compared to the same period in 2016 due primarily to decreased oil extraction rates per bushel of corn, which we attribute primarily to the the quality of corn purchased.

2021. The average price per pound of corn oil was approximately 7.69% highersold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, increased by 54.8% as compared to the same period in 2016 due primarily to higher demand from the2021. Higher soybean oil prices along with increased biodiesel industry during our first fiscal quarter of 2017 and from the feed industry during our second fiscal quarter of 2017 which positively impacted the market price of corn oil. However,production had a positive effect on corn oil demand was lower duringprices for the last half of our fiscal year.period. Soybean oil is the primary competitor with distillers corn oil.

Management expectsanticipates that corn oil prices will remain relatively steady in the near term. However, corncontinue to follow soybean oil prices. Corn oil prices mayare also likely to be negatively affected ifby an industry increase in corn oil supply due to improved operating conditions. However, the renewable volume obligations for biodiesel are reduced by the EPA or ifextension of the biodiesel tax credit that expiredby Congress is likely to continue to have a positive impact on December 31, 2016 is not renewed by Congress. Corn oil prices may also decrease ifdemand from biodiesel plants switch to lower priced alternatives such as soybean oil. Management expectsproducers and corn oil prices. In addition, the impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine coupled with signs of a global economic slowdown on commodity prices is difficult to predict.
    We experienced a decrease of 1.8% in pounds of corn oil sold during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021 due to a slightly lower corn oil yield on production willfor the period coupled with timing of shipments. An increase or decrease in ethanol production rates in the future would result in a corresponding change in corn oil production.

Trading Division

    The following table shows the sources of our revenues from our Trading Division for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 due to completion of various projects which are expected to increase2022 and 2021:
20222021
Revenue SourceAmount% of RevenuesAmount% of Revenues
Soybean Sales$94,854,225 99.9 %$75,635,032 99.8 %
Other Revenue116,331 0.1 121,200 0.2 
Total Revenues$94,970,556 100.0 %$75,756,232 100.0 %

Soybeans

    During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, revenues from our ethanol production capacity to approximately 135 million gallons which would also increase our corn oil production.

Cost of Goods Sold

Trading Division were derived primarily from transporting and selling soybeans. Our cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was approximately 91.60%from soybean sales increased for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as a result of an increase in bushels of soybeans sold of 8.2% during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021. The increase in bushels of soybeans sold is primarily due to more conducive market conditions for selling for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022.

    We also experienced an increase of 15.2% in the average price per bushel of soybeans sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021 primarily due to a comparatively short national supply of soybeans resulting in higher futures prices. The average price per bushel of soybeans sold was $14.94 based on sales of approximately 91.53%6,313,000 bushels for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022.

Cost of Goods Sold

Ethanol Division

    Our cost of goods sold for this division as a percentage of its total revenues was 81.7% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to 90.1% for the same period in 2016.2021. This increasedecrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was the result of was the result of a substantially improved relationship between the prices of ethanol and corn, offset by increased ethanol prices relative to the price of cornnatural gas costs for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016.2021. Our two largest costs of production are corn and natural gas. Cost of goods sold also includes net gains or losses from derivatives related to commodities purchased.purchased as well as our additional expense for our estimate of our rail car rehabilitation expense described below.




24
27

Table of Contents




Corn


Our largest cost associated with the production of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil is corn cost. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we used approximately 3.42% more2022, the bushels of corn we used to produce our ethanol, distillers graingrains and corn oil aswas nearly the same compared to the same period in 2016. More bushels were used in2021 due to slightly higher ethanol production because we produced more gallons oflevels coupled with improved ethanol duringyield for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, compared to the same period in 2016. 2021.

During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017,2022, our average price paid per bushel of corn increased approximately 2.33%18.7% as compared to the same period in 20162021 due primarily due to marketsmaller ending stocks from the 2021 harvest, concerns in the late spring and early summer months about wet conditions in our arearegarding predictions of the corn belt. Better growing conditionscrop for fall of 2022 and increased export demand from China. In addition, global economic uncertainty, market disruptions and increased volatility in Julycommodity prices due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine have contributed to higher corn prices during the period. However, towards the end of the current period, corn prices decreased somewhat due to a more favorable outlook for the size of the 2022 crop and August relieved thoseincreasing concerns but the higher prices earlier caused the average annual price to be higher.of an economic slowdown.

Weather, world supply and demand, current and anticipated stocks, agricultural policy and other factors can contribute to volatility in corn prices. If corn prices rise, it will have a negative effect on our operating margins unless the price of ethanol and distillers grains out paces rising corn prices. Volatility in the price of corn could significantly impact our cost of goods sold.


Natural Gas


Our natural gas cost was higher during our fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.2021. This increase in the cost of natural gas for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 20162021 was primarily the result of an increase of approximately 16.60%79.3% in the average price per MMBTU of natural gas due to lower productionincreased demand, an increase in the price of crude oil, and increased demand which have used upvolatility in prices due to the Russian invasion of Ukraine. However, towards the end of the period ended September 30, 2022, natural gas stocks built up in 2015.prices decreased due to increasing concerns of an economic slowdown. We also used approximately 3.08%0.9% more MMBTUs of natural gas for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016 because of2021 which was primarily due to slightly higher ethanol production.


Natural gas prices are expected to increase in the future due to producers shutting down wells resulting in lower    Management expects that natural gas production and to the conversion of power plants across the U.S. from coal to natural gas. Natural gas prices will also be dependent upon government policy and the severity of the coming winter weather. If the nation were to experience a recession this could also influence natural gas prices. In addition, natural gas supply shortages due to a catastrophic weather event causing problems relatedor the Russian invasion of Ukraine could continue to the supply of natural gas, this could result in higherhave a negative effect on natural gas prices.

Rail Car Rehabilitation Costs

    We lease 180 hopper rail cars under a multi-year agreement which ends in November 2023. Under the agreement, we are required to pay to rehabilitate each car for "damage" that is considered to be other than normal wear and tear upon turn in of each car at the termination of the lease. We have evaluated the condition of the cars and believe that it is probable that we may be assessed for damages incurred. Management has estimated total costs to rehabilitate the cars at September 30, 2022, to be approximately $2,037,000. During the year ended September 30, 2022, we have recorded an expense in cost of goods of approximately $317,000. We accrue the estimated cost per railcar damages over the term of the lease. The accrued liability for these rehabilitation costs is approximately $2,037,000 at September 30, 2022.

Trading Division

    The following table shows the costs incurred to procure various agricultural commodities for our Trading Division for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 and 2021:
20222021
Amount% of RevenuesAmount% of Revenues
Soybeans$91,224,755 96.1 %$73,774,703 97.4 %
Total Cost of Goods Sold$91,224,755 96.1 %$73,774,703 97.4 %

Soybeans

    During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, our cost was primarily the procurement of soybeans sold. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, our average price paid per bushel of soybeans was 22.8% more as compared to the same period in 2021 due to concerns over a smaller carryout of soybean inventory from the 2021 harvest and increased demand
28

Table of Contents

from China. We also purchased 12.8% more bushels of soybeans during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared to the same period in 2021 due to a cash price that was conducive to producer selling.

Derivatives


We enter into hedging instruments to minimize price fluctuations in the prices of our finished products and inputs. As the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the realized or unrealized gains and losses are immediately recognized in our revenues and our cost of goods sold. These commodity-based derivatives are not designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes. Please refer to"Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk-Commodity Price Risk"for information on our derivatives.


Operating Expense


Our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues were approximately 2.41% and 2.34%1.5% for the fiscal yearsyear ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.2022, as compared to operating expenses of 1.8% of revenues for the same period in 2021. Operating expenses include salaries and benefits of administrative employees, insurance, taxes, professional fees, depreciation of trading division fixed assets, property taxes and other general administrative costs. Our efforts to optimize efficiencies and maximize production may result in a decrease in our operating expenses on a per gallon basis. However, because theseThese expenses generally do not vary with the level of production at the plant,plant; we expect our operating expenses to remain steadyconsistent with 2022 into and throughout our 20182023 fiscal year.


Operating Income


Our income from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, was approximately 6.00%14.3% of our revenues compared to operating income of approximately 6.20%6.8% of revenues for the same period in 2016.2021. The decreaseincrease in operating income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, was primarily the result of decreaseda positive corn to ethanol prices relative to the cost of corn.spread.


Other ExpenseIncome (Expense)


We had other expense of approximately 0.14% of revenuesincome for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022 of 1.4% of revenues compared to other incomeexpense of approximately 0.06%0.1% of revenues for the same period in 2016.2021. Other income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 consisted of a grant received from the USDA Biofuel Producer Program, along with the receipt of insurance proceeds from an inventory write off in the prior period. This increase in otherincome was partially offset by payments made during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022 for items related to our CCS Project. Other expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, was2021, consisted primarily due to drawing additional fundsof a loss on our debt facilities which increased our interest expense for our fiscal year ended September 30, 2017.the disposal of the boiler and a loss from tainted soybeans offset by the receipt of Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness.


25

Table of Contents




Results of Operations for the Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 20162021 and 20152020


The following table shows the results of our operations and the percentage of revenues, cost of goods sold, operating expenses and other items to total revenues in our statement of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20162021 and 2015:2020:
 20212020
Statement of Operations DataAmount%Amount%
Revenues$404,002,166 100.0 $244,718,562 100.0 
Cost of Goods Sold369,373,828 91.4 239,426,482 97.8 
Gross Profit34,628,338 8.6 5,292,080 2.2 
Operating Expenses7,179,061 1.8 6,773,264 2.8 
Operating Income (Loss)27,449,277 6.8 (1,481,184)(0.6)
Other Income (Expense), net(339,399)(0.1)340,751 0.1 
Net Income (Loss)$27,109,878 6.7 $(1,140,433)(0.5)
 2016 2015
Statement of Operations DataAmount % Amount %
Revenues$222,895,449
 100.0
 $240,695,293
 100.0
Cost of Goods Sold204,014,877
 91.5
 197,305,291
 82.0
Gross Profit18,880,572
 8.5
 43,390,002
 18.0
Operating Expenses5,233,634
 2.3
 4,714,891
 2.0
Operating Income13,646,938
 6.2
 38,675,111
 16.0
Other Expense, net(125,143) (0.1) 46,706
 
Net Income$13,521,795
 6.1
 $38,721,817
 16.0

Revenues


    We have two reportable segments-the Ethanol Division and the Trading Division. Our revenues from operations from our Ethanol Division come from three primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. Revenues from operations of our Trading Division are derived from procuring, transporting and selling grain commodities. Revenues in each division also include net gains or losses from derivatives related to products sold.
29

Table of Contents

    The following table shows the sources of our total revenue from the two segments and the approximate percentage of revenues to total revenues in our consolidated statements of operations for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:

20212020
Revenue:Amount% of Total RevenuesAmount% of Total Revenues
Ethanol division$328,245,934 81.2 %$211,573,718 86.5 %
Trading division75,756,232 18.8 33,144,844 13.5 
Total Revenue$404,002,166 100.0 %$244,718,562 100.0 %

Ethanol Division

Our revenues from operations come from three primary sources: sales of fuel ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil. The following table shows the sources of our ethanol division revenue for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20162021 and 2015.2020:

20212020
Revenue SourceAmount% of RevenuesAmount% of Revenues
Ethanol Sales$251,922,325 76.7 %$157,704,059 74.5 %
Distillers Grains Sales57,818,038 17.7 41,687,109 19.7 
Corn Oil Sales17,966,544 5.5 9,640,523 4.6 
CO2 Sales484,752 0.1 493,500 0.2 
Other Revenue54,275 — 2,048,527 1.0 
Total Revenues$328,245,934 100.0 %$211,573,718 100.0 %
 2016 2015
Revenue SourceAmount% of Revenues Amount% of Revenues
Ethanol Sales$173,252,481
77.7% $181,640,992
75.5%
Distillers Grains Sales40,709,845
18.3
 50,269,686
20.9
Corn Oil Sales8,226,924
3.7
 8,120,749
3.3
CO2 Sales514,937
0.2
 488,065
0.2
Other Revenue191,262
0.1
 175,801
0.1
Total Revenues$222,895,449
100% $240,695,293
100%


Ethanol
    
Our revenues from ethanol decreasedincreased for our fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to our fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease in revenues wasis primarily the result of a decrease in thehigher average price per gallon of ethanol sold and an increase in gallons of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. Revenue also includes the net gains or losses from derivatives related to the commodities purchased.
    
We experienced an increase in ethanol gallons sold of approximately 5.13% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 resulting primarily from increased ethanol production rates.

Our average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, was approximately 8.86% lower53.2% higher than our average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the same period in 2015.2020. Ethanol market prices were lower during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 due in part to higher national ethanol stocks resulting from increased ethanol production. High industry production levels outpaced strong domestic consumption and export demand experienced during the last two quarters of our 2016 fiscal year. In addition, because ethanol prices are typically directionally consistent with changes in corn and energy prices, lower corn, crude oil and gasoline prices throughout the fiscal year had a negative affect on ethanol prices.

Although the average price per gallon of ethanol sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 was2021 due to an increase in fuel demand, lower ethanol production due to some plants in certain areas curtailing production in response to poor market conditions, and higher oil and corn prices during the period. In addition, ethanol prices were negatively impacted in the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 by industry-wide production in excess of demand due to a variety of factors including the EPA granting small refinery waivers, trade barriers resulting from disputes with foreign governments and a collapse in both domestic and foreign demand as a result of restrictions put in place in response to the COVID-19 pandemic.

    We experienced an increase in ethanol gallons sold of 4.2% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as compared to the same period in 2015, the price of corn declined more during the comparable period and the spread between2020 resulting primarily from increased ethanol price and corn price on a per gallon basis was positive throughout fiscal year 2016, widening in the fourth quarter. Thus, most of our profit for the 2016 fiscal year was derived from the last fiscal quarter.production rates.     

Distillers Grains


Our revenues from distillers grains decreasedincreased in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease in revenues is primarily the result of a decreasean increase in the average market price per ton of distillers grains sold for the period ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020.

    The average market price per ton of distillers grains sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 was approximately 18.99% lower than2021, increased by 34.0% compared to the average price per ton of distillers grains

26

Table of Contents



sold for the same period in 2015.2020. This declineincrease in the market price of distillers grains wasis primarily due primarily to higher corn and soybean meal prices which resulted in end users seeking out distillers grains as the lower domestic and export demandcost alternative during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 as compared to the same period in 2015 which resulted in a decline in the price of distillers grains as a percentage of corn values.2021.

China was historically a significant consumer of exported distillers grains particularly since December 2014 following the resolution of a dispute related to China's objection to the presence of an unapproved genetically modified organism in some U.S. shipments. However, an anti-dumping investigation began by the Chinese government on January 12, 2016 into distillers grains produced in the U.S. and the imposition by China of anti-dumping and anti-subsidy duties on U.S. imports had a negative effect on export demand from China resulting in lower distillers grains prices.
    
We experienced a decreasean increase of approximately 0.59%3.5% in distillers grains tons sold in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 20152020 due primarily to timingincreased DDGS production rates during the fiscal year.

30

Table of shipments.Contents


Corn Oil


Our revenues from corn oil sales increased by approximately 1.31%86.4% in the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 20152020 which was primarily amainly the result of increased volume of sales and an increase in the poundsaverage price per pound of corn oil sold infor the fiscal yearperiod ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015. 2020. We experienced an increase of 13.5% in pounds of corn oil sold during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as compared to the same period in 2020 due to higher corn oil yield on average resulting in higher corn oil production for the period.

The average price per pound of corn oil was approximately 3.70% lowersold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, increased by 68.0% as compared to the same period in 2015 due to increased local supplies and decreased demand from the biodiesel industry which is traditionally one of the largest markets for corn oil. Corn2020. Higher soybean oil prices were low during our firstalong with increased biodiesel production had a positive effect on corn oil prices for the period, particularly towards the beginning of fiscal quarter but then gradually increased throughout muchyear 2021. Soybean oil is the primary competitor with distillers corn oil.
Trading Division

    The following table shows the sources of our fiscal year.

We sold approximately 4.26% more corn oil inrevenues from our Trading Division for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021 and 2020:
20212020
Revenue SourceAmount% of RevenuesAmount% of Revenues
Soybean Sales$75,635,032 99.8 %$33,057,394 99.7 %
Other Revenue121,200 0.2 87,450 0.3 
Total Revenues$75,756,232 100.0 %$33,144,844 100.0 %

Soybeans

    During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, revenues from our Trading Division were derived primarily from transporting and selling soybeans. Our revenues from soybean sales increased for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as a result of an increase in bushels of soybeans sold of 61.3% during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as compared to the same period in 20152020. The increase in bushels of soybeans sold is primarily due primarily to increased plant production rates.

Cost of Goods Sold

Our cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was approximately 91.5%more conducive market conditions for selling for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021.

    We also experienced an increase of 41.3% in the average price per bushel of soybeans sold for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as compared to the same period in 2020 primarily due to smaller carryout for the 2020 harvest driving the remaining stock price higher. The presence of exports to China during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 was also a contributing factor to higher prices. The average price per bushel of soybeans sold was $12.96 based on sales of approximately 82.0%5,834,000 bushels for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021.

Cost of Goods Sold

Ethanol Division

    Our cost of goods sold for this division as a percentage of its total revenues was 90.1% for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as compared to 98.3% for the same period in 2015.2020. This increasedecrease in cost of goods sold as a percentage of revenues was the result of decreasedincreased ethanol prices relative to the price of corn and natural gas for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. Our two largest costs of production are corn and natural gas. Cost of goods sold also includes net gains or losses from derivatives related to commodities purchased.


Corn


Our largest cost associated with the production of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil is corn cost. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, we used approximately 2.07% more2021, the bushels of corn we used to produce our ethanol, distillers graingrains and corn oil increased by 4.6% as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. More bushels were used in production because we produced more gallons ofdue to higher overall ethanol duringproduction levels for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, compared to the same period in 2015.2020. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016,2021, our average price paid per bushel of corn decreased approximately 9.23%increased 45.1% as compared to the same period in 2015. Corn prices trended lower most of our 2016 fiscal year2020 due primarily due to a plentiful 2015smaller ending stocks from the 2020 harvest, concerns that the anticipated planting acres for 2021 would be insufficient to compensate for the smaller 2020 crop, and an increase in national corn stocks. However, corn prices became more volatile and fluctuated throughout our last fiscal quarter as there were some concerns over the 2016 crop due to a lackincreased export demand from China.

31

Table of rain during the critical pollination stage in the local areas surrounding our plant.Contents


Natural Gas


Our natural gas cost was lowerhigher during our fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease in the cost of natural gas for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 20152020 was primarily the result of a decreasean increase of approximately 28.18%13.5% in the average price per MMBTU of natural gas primarily due to plentiful supply.increased demand. In addition, natural gas prices were higher towards the end of the period as a result of an increase in the price of crude oil. We also used approximately 6.78%5.7% more MMBTUs of natural gas for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015 because of2020 which was primarily due to higher ethanol production.


Natural gas prices remained low during mostRail Car Rehabilitation Costs

    We lease 180 hopper rail cars under a multi-year agreement which ends in November 2023. Under the agreement, we are required to pay to rehabilitate each car for "damage" that is considered to be other than normal wear and tear upon turn in of each car at the termination of the lease. We have evaluated the condition of the cars and believe that it is probable that we may be assessed for damages incurred. Management has estimated total costs to rehabilitate the cars at September 30, 2021, to be approximately $1,751,000. During the year ended September 30, 2021, we have recorded an expense in cost of goods of $298,000. We accrue the estimated cost per railcar damages over the term of the lease.

Trading Division

    The following table shows the costs incurred to procure various agricultural commodities for our Trading Division for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021 and 2020:
20212020
Amount% of RevenuesAmount% of Revenues
Soybeans$73,774,703 97.4 %$31,415,693 94.8 %
Total Cost of Goods Sold$73,774,703 97.4 %$31,415,693 94.8 %

Soybeans

    During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, our cost was primarily the procurement of soybeans sold. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, our average price paid per bushel of soybeans was 23.5% more as compared to the same period in 2020 due to increased natural gas production which outpaced demandconcerns over a smaller crop and resulted in increased stocks. Natural gas prices rose slightly towardssmaller ending stocks from the end2020 harvest. We also purchased 58.9% more bushels of our 2016soybeans during the fiscal year due to producers shutting down wells resulting in lower natural gas production andended September 30, 2021, as compared to the conversion of power plants across the U.S. from coal to natural gas.same period in 2020.

27

Table of Contents




Derivatives


We enter into hedging instruments to minimize price fluctuations in the prices of our finished products and inputs. As the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the realized or unrealized gains and losses are immediately recognized in our revenues and our cost of goods sold. These commodity-based derivatives are not designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes. Please refer to"Item 7A - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk-Commodity Price Risk"for information on our derivatives.


Operating Expense


Our operating expenses as a percentage of revenues were approximately 2.34% and 1.96%1.8% for the fiscal yearsyear ended September 30, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2021, as compared to operating expenses of 2.8% of revenues for the same period in 2020. Operating expenses include salaries and benefits of administrative employees, insurance, taxes, professional fees, depreciation of trading division fixed assets, property taxes and other general administrative costs. Our efforts to optimize efficiencies and maximize production may result in a decrease in our operating expenses on a per gallon basis. These expenses generally do not vary with the level of production at the plant; we expect our operating expenses to remain consistent with 2021 into and throughout our 2022 fiscal year.


Operating Income (Loss)


Our income from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, was approximately 6.12%6.8% of our revenues compared to operating incomeloss of approximately 16.07%0.6% of revenues for the same period in 2015.2020. The decreaseincrease in operating income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, was primarily the result of decreaseda positive corn to ethanol prices relative to the costspread.

32

Table of corn.Contents


Other Income (Expense)

We had other expense of approximately 0.06% of revenues for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016 compared to other income of approximately 0.02% of revenues for the same period in 2015. This increase in other expense for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, was primarily due2021 of 0.1% of revenues compared to drawing additional funds on our Declining Note which increased our interestother income of 0.1% of revenues for the same period in 2020. Other expense for ourthe fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.2021 consisted of a loss on the disposal of a boiler and a loss from tainted soybeans. These losses were offset by the receipt of Paycheck Protection Program loan forgiveness during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021. Other income for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020, consisted primarily of insurance proceeds from the DDGS silo explosion being received in January 2020.


Changes in Financial Condition for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20172022


The following table highlights the changes in our financial condition for the fiscal years ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016:2021:

September 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Current Assets$102,033,729 $76,439,260 
Current Liabilities27,431,166 23,741,046 
Long-Term Liabilities14,254,170 3,460,301 
Members' Equity147,270,492 124,737,578 

 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
Current Assets$50,139,370
 $48,529,843
Current Liabilities18,007,407
 11,676,852
Long-term Liabilities14,581,758
 11,932,063
Members' Equity126,582,831
 130,320,257

We experienced an increase in our current assets at September 30, 20172022 as compared to September 30, 2016.2021. This increase was primarily driven by an increase in our graincash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash at September 30, 2022 compared to September 30, 2021 due to improved profitability along with varying cash requirements with derivative trading counter-parties. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in accounts receivable and inventories at September 30, 20172022 compared to September 30, 2016 because the harvest began earlier and because we began operations of our new Trading Division and were holding soybeans for sale. Our trade accounts2021. Accounts receivable increaseddecreased due to ethanol revenues and the timing of rail shipments before fiscal year end. Weof ethanol and soybeans. Inventory values also experienced an increasedecreased due to a slower start to the harvest season resulting in our commodity derivative instruments and miscellaneous receivableslower inventory on hand at September 30, 20172022, as compared to September 30, 2016 due to the volume of corn and soybean purchases that were hedged at September 30, 2017.2021.


We experienced an increase in our total current liabilities at September 30, 20172022, as compared to September 30, 2016. The2021. This increase is primarily due to anthe increase in our grain accounts payable at September 30, 20172022, as compared to September 30, 2016 due to the earlier harvest and building a soybean inventory using producer credit. We also experienced an increase in trade accounts payable due to2021, which resulted from higher commodity prices as well as the timing of capital expenditures and natural gas invoices and an increase in our current maturities of long-term debt atharvest for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to September 30, 2016 because of the additional debt incurred for construction of the grain receiving and loading facility for our Trading Division.2021.


We experienced an increase in our long-term liabilities as of September 30, 20172022, as compared to September 30, 2016. The increase is due2021 as a result of obtaining additional financing to borrowing funds to pay forfund the construction and installation of the grain receiving and loading facility for our Trading Division.high protein feed system as of September 30, 2022.



28

Table of Contents



Liquidity and Capital Resources


    We have engaged ICM, Inc. to install a system to produce high protein feed which is currently expected to cost approximately $50,000,000, including recent change orders. The agreement calls for a down payment and scheduled payments at key points during the construction and installation process, which began during the fourth quarter of fiscal 2022.

The prices of ethanol, corn, natural gas and soybeans have risen substantially over the last several months. We believe that we have sufficient cash and credit facilities to provide liquidity over the next twelve months. However, if the prices continue to rise, we may explore options with our primary lender to expand the funding of our working capital.

Based on financial forecasts performed by our management, we anticipate that we will have sufficient cash from our current credit facilities and cash from our operations to continue to operate the ethanol plant for the next 12 months. We do not anticipate seeking additional equity financing during our 2018 fiscal year. However, should we experience unfavorable operating conditions in the ethanol industry that prevent us from profitably operating the ethanol plant,deteriorate or continue for a prolonged period, we could have difficulty maintaining our liquidity and may need to rely on our revolving lines of credit or seek to increase our limits for operations.
33

Table of Contents

Comparison of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 20172022 and 20162021


The following table shows cash flows for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022 and 2016:2021:

20222021
Net cash provided by operating activities$103,979,005 $32,148,142 
Net cash used for investing activities(20,464,388)(3,846,527)
Net cash used for financing activities(54,170,950)(11,319,650)
Net increase in cash, cash equivalents & restricted cash29,343,667 16,981,965 
Cash, cash equivalents & restricted cash, beginning of period33,895,947 16,913,982 
Cash, cash equivalents & restricted cash, end of period$63,239,614 $33,895,947 
  2017 2016
Net cash provided by operating activities $21,535,242
 $23,207,492
Net cash used for investing activities (12,950,173) (6,931,007)
Net cash used for financing activities (13,650,819) (13,852,664)
Net increase (decrease) in cash & restricted cash (5,065,750) 2,423,821
Cash & restricted cash, beginning of period 24,462,911
 22,039,090
Cash & restricted cash, end of period $19,397,161
 $24,462,911

Cash Flow from Operations


We experienced a decreasean increase in our cash flow from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016.2021. This decreaseincrease was primarily the result of decreased ethanol and distillers grain prices relativedue to the cost of corn and the impact these prices hadimproved margins on inventory and other working capital componentsour primary products for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared withto the same period in 2016.2021 coupled with decreased inventory on hand and decreased deferral of payments for grain until January at September 30, 2022 compared with September 30, 2021. This lower inventory and smaller deferral can be attributed to a later start to the 2022 harvest season.


Cash Flow used for Investing Activities


We used more cash in investing activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016.2021. This decreaseincrease was primarily the result of an increaseincreased capital expenditures for the installation of our high protein feed system by ICM, Inc. for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, as compared with the same period in payments for construction in progress due to construction of the grain receiving and loading facility for our Trading Division.2021.


Cash Flow used for Financing Activities


We used lessmore cash for financing activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared to the same period in 2016.2021. This decreaseincrease was the result of paying lessusing more cash for distributions to our members coupled with obtaining additional financing to fund the construction and installation of our high protein feed system during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20172022, as compared towith the same period in 2016. This was partially offset by net additional borrowing of approximately $3.5 million from our debt facilities.2021.


Our liquidity, results of operations and financial performance will be impacted by many variables, including the market price for commodities such as, but not limited to, corn, ethanol, soybeans and other energy commodities, as well as the market price for any co-products generated by the facility and the cost of labor and other operating costs.  Assuming future relative price levels for corn, ethanol, and distillers grains and soybeans remain consistent with the relative price levels as of September 30, 2017,2022, we expect operations to generate adequate cash flows to maintain operations.
Comparison of Cash Flows for Fiscal Years Ended September 30, 20162021 and 20152020


The following table shows cash flows for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021 and 2015:2020:

20212020
Net cash provided by operating activities$32,148,142 $5,736,271 
Net cash used for investing activities(3,846,527)(2,796,452)
Net cash used for financing activities(11,319,650)(8,059,957)
Net increase (decrease) in cash & restricted cash16,981,965 (5,120,138)
Cash & restricted cash, beginning of period16,913,982 22,034,120 
Cash & restricted cash, end of period$33,895,947 $16,913,982 

29

Table of Contents



  2016 2015
Net cash provided by operating activities $23,207,492
 $50,201,987
Net cash used for investing activities (6,931,007) (10,524,207)
Net cash used for financing activities (13,852,664) (46,255,766)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and restricted cash 2,423,821
 (6,577,986)
Cash & restricted cash, beginning of period 22,039,090
 28,617,076
Cash and restricted cash, end of period $24,462,911
 $22,039,090

Cash Flow from Operations


We experienced a decreasean increase in our cash flow from operations for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease was primarily the result of decreased ethanol and distillers grain prices relativedue to the cost of cornimproved margins on our primary products for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared withto the same period in 2015.2020 coupled with a greater deferral of payments for

34

Table of Contents

grain until January as of September 30, 2021 compared with September 30, 2020. This deferral is larger because of the increase in the price of corn and soybeans in 2021 compared with 2020.

Cash Flow used for Investing Activities


We used lessmore cash in investing activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease was primarily the result of a decrease in payments for construction in progress and otherincreased capital expenditures due to finalizing our expansion projects.for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021, as compared with the same period in 2020.

Cash Flow used for Financing Activities


We used lessmore cash for financing activities for the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared to the same period in 2015.2020. This decreaseincrease was the result of paying lessusing more cash in distributions to our members during the fiscal year ended September 30, 20162021, as compared towith the same period in 2015. However,2020.

Our liquidity, results of operations and financial performance will be impacted by many variables, including the market price for commodities such as, but not limited to, corn, ethanol, soybeans and other energy commodities, as well as the market price for any co-products generated by the facility and the cost of labor and other operating costs.  Assuming future relative price levels for corn, ethanol, distillers grains and soybeans remain consistent with the relative price levels as of September 30, 2021, we did borrow funds from our Declining Loanexpect operations to fund our expansion projects during the 2015 period.

generate adequate cash flows to maintain operations.
Short and Long TermLong-Term Debt Sources


We have a loan agreement consisting of fourtwo loans, the Term Loan, the Declining Revolving Loan ("Declining Loan"), and the Revolving Credit Loan and a Construction Loan. In exchange for these loans, we granted liens on all property (real and personal, tangible and intangible) which include, among other things, a mortgage on the property, a security interest on commodity trading accounts, and assignment of material contracts. On March 23, 2017, we executed a Tenth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement to be effective as of February 28, 2017, which amends the First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement dated June 10, 2013 (the "Amendment"). The primary purpose of the Amendment was to provide an additional $10,000,000 in financing to fund construction of the grain receiving and loading facility for our Trading Division. (the "Construction Loan"). The Amendment also extends the termination date of the Revolving Credit Loan from February 28, 2017 to February 28, 2018 and amends the mortgage to add an additional 64 acres of land purchased in October 2016. Please refer to "ItemItem 8 - Consolidated Financial Statements, Note 89 - Bank Financing" Financing for additional details regarding the Amendment.details.
TermDeclining Loan
    
The interest rate on the Term Loan is based on the 3-month London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") plus two hundred ninety basis points. The interest rate at September 30, 2017 was 4.20%. The Term Loan requires monthly installment payments of approximately $282,700 commencing on September 1, 2016, with a final maturity date of February 28, 2021. There was approximately $11,856,000 outstanding on the Term Loan at September 30, 2017 and approximately $14,820,000 outstanding on the Term Loan at September 30, 2016.

Declining Loan
The maximum availability of the Declining Loan iswas formerly $5,000,000 withand such amount was to be available for working capital purposes. However, the maximum availability of the Declining Loan was increased from $5,000,000 to $36,000,000 in order to provide financing to fund the construction and installation of a new high protein feed system at the plant. The interest rate on the Declining Loan is currently based on the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninetyprime rate minus five basis points.points (.05%) subject to a floor of 2.85%. The interest rate at September 30, 2017 was 4.20%. There was no borrowings outstanding on the Declining Loan at September 30, 20172022 was 6.20%. We will be required to make monthly interest payments on the Declining Loan during the draw period. The principal balance of the Declining Loan is expected to be converted to term debt on or before February 1, 2024, to be repaid in 60 equal monthly installments based on a ten year amortization period. In addition, we will be required to make mandatory annual prepayments on the term debt within 120 days following the end of each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016.

2024. The annual prepayment will be in the amount of the lesser of 40% of excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement) or $7,200,000, up to an aggregate prepayment amount of $18,000,000. We had borrowings outstanding of $9,000,000 on the Declining Loan at September 30, 2022 and no borrowings on September 30, 2021.
    

30

Table of Contents



Revolving Credit Loan


The Revolving Credit Loan has a limit of $15,000,000$20,000,000 supported by a borrowing base made up of our corn, ethanol, dried distillers grain, and corn oil and soybean inventories reduced by accounts payable associated with those inventories having a priority over FNBO.priority. It is also supported by the eligible accounts receivable and commodity trading account excess margin funds. The interest rate on the Revolving Credit Loan is the 1-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninetyprime rate minus twenty-five basis points.points (.25%) and is subject to a floor of 2.75%. The interest rate at September 30, 20172022 was 4.14%6.00%. There were no borrowings outstanding on the Revolving Credit Loan at September 30, 20172022 or September 30, 2016.

Construction Loan

2021. The Construction Loan has a limit of $10,000,000. The interest rate on the ConstructionRevolving Credit Loan is basedset to mature on the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninety basis points and at September 30, 2017 was 4.22%. There were borrowings in the amount of approximately $6,476,000 outstanding on the Construction Loan at September 30, 2017 and no borrowings outstanding on the Construction Loan at September 30, 2016. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we have capitalized approximately $263,000 of interest related to the various improvement and construction projects. This compares with approximately $175,000 capitalized in the same period ended September 30, 2016.February 28, 2023.

Covenants

    
Covenants

During the term of the loans, we will be subject to certain financial covenants. Our minimum working capital is $15,000,000, which is calculated as our current assets plus the amount available for drawing under our long termlong-term revolving note, less current liabilities. Our minimum fixed charge coverage ratio is no less than 1.15:1.0 measured on a rolling four
35

Table of Contents

quarter average basis. However, for any reporting period, if our working capital is equal to or more than $25,000,000,$23,000,000, we will be subject to maintaining a debt service charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.25:1.0 in lieu of the fixed charge coverage ratio.


Our loan agreement also requires us to obtain prior approval from our lender before making, or committing to make, capital expenditures exceeding an aggregate amount of $5,000,000 in any single fiscal year except for$5,000,000. The cost of the 2017 fiscal year when we were allowed $7,000,000 of expenditures without prior approval excluding the grain loading and receiving projecthigh protein feed system is excluded from the calculation.capital expenditures calculation until the principal balance of the Declining Loan converts to term debt.


We are meeting our liquidity needs and complying with our financial covenants and the other terms of our loan agreements at September 30, 2017.2022. Based on current management projections, we anticipate that future operations will be sufficient to generate enough cash flow to maintain operations, service any new debt and comply with our financial covenants and other terms of our loan agreements through September 30 , 2018.for the next twelve months. Should market conditions deteriorate in the future, circumstances may develop which could result in us violating the financial covenants or other terms of our loan agreements. Should we violate the terms or covenants of our loan or fail to obtain a waiver of any such term or covenant, our primary lender could deem us in default of our loans and require us to immediately repay a significant portion or possibly the entire outstanding balance of our loans if we have a balance outstanding. In that event, our lender could also elect to proceed with a foreclosure action on our plant.
Capital Improvements

    We are planning various capital projects scheduled for the 2023 fiscal year in order to make certain improvements to the ethanol plant and maintain the facility. These improvements include updates to the 190 condenser, rail siding, sieve vaporizer, cyber security, grain scales, spare parts storage, and other small miscellaneous projects. We have also invested in an ethanol recovery system, costing approximately $2,400,000. The project was funded through operations and was completed and placed into service during the first quarter of fiscal year 2022.

We have also engaged ICM, Inc. to install a system to produce high protein feed which is currently expected to cost approximately $50,000,000, including recent change orders, and be funded from operations and from and our current credit facilities as amended. We will also license from ICM technology to use, operate and maintain the system and expect to pay license fees of $10 per ton of PROTOMAX™ produced for a period of 10 years. Installation of the system commenced during the fourth quarter of our 2022 fiscal year. This project is expected to be completed by Fall of 2023.

Development Agreement


In September 2007, the Companywe entered into a development agreement with Randolph County Redevelopment Commission (“the Commission”) to promote economic development in the area. Under the terms of this agreement, beginning in January 2008 through December 2028, the money the Company payswe pay toward property tax expense is allocated to an expense and an acquisition account. The funds in the acquisition account can be used by the Commission to purchase equipment, at the Company'sour direction, for the plant. The Company doesWe do not have title to or control over the funds in the acquisition account, no amounts have been recorded in the balance sheet relating to this account.

Tax Abatement

In October 2006, the real estate on which our plant was constructed was determined to be an economic revitalization area, which qualified us for tax abatement. The abatement period is for a ten year term, with an effective date beginning calendar year end 2009 for the property taxes payable in calendar year 2010. The program allows for 100% abatement of property taxes beginning in year 1, and then decreases on a ratable scale so that in year 11 the full amount of property taxes are due and payable. We must apply annually and meet specified criteria to qualify for the abatement program.


31

Table of Contents



Capital Improvements

We have completed various projects over the past two fiscal years that have allowed us to increase our annual ethanol production rate for During the fiscal yearyears ended September 30, 2017. We added storage capacity to our plant2022 and made other improvements to our plant which were substantially complete at September 30, 2016 for a total cost2021, no amounts were refunded to the Company and used to offset costs of capital expenditures.

Grants

On May 23, 2022, we received an award from the USDA Biofuel Producer Program of approximately $16,500,000. We also added a fermenter, cooling tower cell, beer-degasser$7,652,000. The Biofuel Producer Program was created as part of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and performed miscellaneous de-bottlenecking improvements which were substantially complete and placed into service at September 30, 2017 for a total cost of approximately $6,400,000. We expect that these various projects will allowed us to increase our annual ethanol production for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2018 to approximately 135 million gallons.
We also completed a construction project to add grain receiving and train loading facilities and additional rail spurs, track and grain storage to allow us to procure, transport and sell grain commodities through our new Trading Division. This project was substantially complete at September 30, 2017 for a total cost of approximately $9,300,000. However, although the Trading Division began operations at the end of our fourth fiscal quarter of 2017, we have determinedEconomic Security Act. The USDA announced that the Trading Division was not materialfunds were made available to our business at September 30, 2017,provide economic relief to biofuels producers who faced unexpected market losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic and therefore is not consideredsupport a reportable, separate business segment. We intend to continue to monitor the Trading Division to assess its materiality to our businesssignificant market for future periods. To provide funding for this construction project, we executed a Tenth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement with our primary lender, First National Bank of Omaha. Please refer to "Item 1 - Financial Statements, Note 8 - Bank Financing" for additional details regarding the terms of our construction financing.agricultural producers who supply products used in biofuel production.


Contractual Cash Obligations


In addition to our long-term debt obligations, we have certain other contractual cash obligations and commitments. The following tables provide information regarding our contractual obligations and approximate commitments as of September 30, 2017:2022:
36

Table of Contents

Payment Due By Period Payment Due By Period
Contractual Cash ObligationsTotal 
Less than
One Year
 
One to
Three
Years
 
Three to
Five
Years
 
After Five
Years
Contractual Cash ObligationsTotalLess than
One Year
One to
Two
Years
Three to
Five
Years
After Five
Years
Long-Term Debt Obligations$20,275,490
 $4,462,740
 $12,678,604
 $3,134,146
 $
Long-Term Debt Obligations$9,000,000 $— $1,622,646 $5,358,589 $2,018,765 
Operating Lease Obligations$4,120,270
 1,171,870
 2,795,400
 153,000
 
Operating Lease Obligations7,149,690 3,842,130 3,307,560 — — 
Purchase Obligations$12,268,353
 11,624,291
 644,062
 


Purchase Obligations59,048,072 39,765,065 19,283,007 — — 
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$36,664,113
 $17,258,901
 $16,118,066
 $3,287,146
 $
Total Contractual Cash Obligations$75,197,762 $43,607,195 $24,213,213 $5,358,589 $2,018,765 
 
The long-term debt obligations in the table above include both estimated principal and interest payments applicable to the obligations incurred as a result of the borrowings against the Term Loan for our expansion projects (discussed above).    The operating lease obligations in the table above include our hopper railcars and forklifttank railcar lease obligations as of September 30, 2017.2022. Purchase obligations consist of forward contracted corn and soybean deliveries and forward contracted natural gas purchases.


Critical Accounting Estimates


Management uses various estimates and assumptions in preparing our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. Accounting estimates that are the most important to the presentation of our results of operations and financial condition, and which require the greatest use of judgment by management, are designated as our critical accounting estimates. We have the following critical accounting estimates:


We enter into derivative instruments to hedge the variability of expected future cash flows related to commodity markets. We do not typically enter into derivative instruments other than for economic hedging purposes. All derivative instruments are recognized on the September 30, 20172022 balance sheet at their fair market value. Changes in the fair value of a derivative instrument that is designated as and meets all of the required criteria for a cash flow hedge are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings as the underlying hedged items affect earnings.


As of September 30, 2017,2022, we have open short (selling) positions for 2,110,00011,045,000 bushels of corn and long (buying) positions for 405,000965,000 bushels of corn on the Chicago Board of Trade, open short (selling) positions of 4,410,00036,960,000 gallons of ethanol and long (buying) positions of 4,200,00024,570,000 gallons of ethanol on the Chicago Board of Trade. We have no open positions for soybean oil on the Chicago Board of Trade. We also have open short (selling) positions for 1,240,000 bushels of soybeans and 5,000 long (buying) positions of bushels of soybeans on the Chicago Board of Trade. These derivatives have not been designated as an effective hedge for accounting purposes. Corn, ethanol, and ethanolsoybean positions are forecasted to settle through December 2023, March 20182023, and December

32

Table of Contents



2017,November 2023, respectively. There may be offsetting positions that are not shown on a net basis that could lower the notional amount of positions outstanding as disclosed above.


We carry our long-lived assets at the original acquisition cost as required by current generally accepted accounting principles. Due to business conditions and the business environment in which our industry operates, the fair market value of those assets could, theoretically, fall below the amount which we carry them in our consolidated financial statements. In such cases, those assets would be known as impaired. Thus, we periodically perform an assessment of the fair value of these assets. Given the significant assumptions required and the possibility that actual conditions will differ, we consider the assessment of the useful lives of property and equipment to be a critical accounting estimate. Our assessment shows us that the fair value of our long-lived assets as a group is substantially in excess of its carrying value.


We value our    Inventories consist of raw materials, work in process, finished goods, grain inventory and parts. Corn is the primary raw material. Finished goods consist of ethanol, dried distiller grains and corn oil. For the Ethanol Division, we state inventories at the lower of weighted average cost or net realizable value. For our Trading Division, we state our grain inventories at market price less estimated disposition costs. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the normal course of business, less reasonably predictable costs. Our estimates are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable. These valuations require the use of management's assumptions which do not reflect unanticipated events and circumstances that may occur. In our analysis, we consider future corn costs and ethanol prices, break-even points for our plant and our risk management strategies in place through our derivative instruments and forward contracts. Given the significant assumptions required and the possibility that actual conditions will differ, we consider the valuation of the lower of cost or net realizable value on inventory to be a critical accounting estimate.


37

Table of Contents

We enter into forward contracts for corngrain purchases and natural gas to supply the plant.two divisions. These contracts represent firm purchase commitments which must be evaluated for potential losses. We have determined that there are no losses that are required to be recognized on these firm purchase commitments related to corn contracts in place at September 30, 2017.2022. Our estimates include various assumptions including the future prices of ethanol, distillers grains, corn, natural gas and corn.soybeans.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements    We lease 180 hopper rail cars under a multi-year agreement which ends in November 2023. Under the agreement, we are required to pay to rehabilitate each car for "damage" that is considered to be other than normal wear and tear upon return of each car at the termination of the lease. We have estimated total costs to rehabilitate the cars at September 30, 2022, to be approximately $2,037,000. This is based on our estimate of incurred damages as of the end of the fiscal year, on expected total car damages at the lease termination, and upon damage claims charged to industry peers with similar leasing arrangements. During the year ended September 30, 2022, we have recorded an expense in cost of goods sold of $317,000. We accrue the estimated cost of damage to the rail cars over the term of the lease, but because the actual cost is not finalized until the lease termination, it is reasonably possible that there will be a change in the estimate in the future.


We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK


We are exposed to the impact of market fluctuations associated with interest rates and commodity prices as discussed below. We have no exposure to foreign currency risk as all of our business is conducted in U.S. Dollars. We use derivative financial instruments as part of an overall strategy to manage market risk. We use cash, futures and option contracts to hedge changes to the commodity prices of corn and natural gas. We do not enter into these derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes, nor do we designate these contracts as hedges for accounting purposes. We used derivative financial instruments to alter our exposure to interest rate risk.


Interest Rate Risk


We are exposed to market risk from changes in interest rates. Exposure to interest rate risk results primarily from our Term Loan,Our Declining Loan and Revolving Credit Loan and Construction Loan whichall bear variable interest rates. The interest rate for the Term Loan is the 3-month LIBOR rate plus 290 basis points with no minimum. There wereWe had borrowings in the amountoutstanding of approximately $11,856,000 outstanding$9,000,000 on the TermDeclining Loan at September 30, 2022 and the applicable interest rate was 4.20%6.20% at September 30, 2017. The interest rate2022. We had no borrowings on the DecliningRevolving Credit Loan is the 3-month LIBOR plus 290 basis points with no minimum. There were no borrowings outstanding on the Declining Loanat September 30, 2022 and the applicable interest rate was 4.20%6.00% at September 30, 2017. The interest rate for the Revolving Credit Note is the 1-month LIBOR rate plus 290 basis points with no minimum. There were no outstanding balances on the Revolving Credit Note at September 30, 2017 and the applicable interest rate was 4.14%. The interest rate on the Construction Loan is the 3-month LIBOR plus 290 basis points with no minimum. There were borrowings in the amount of approximately $6,476,000 outstanding on the Construction Loan and the applicable interest rate was 4.22% at September 30, 2017.2022. The specifics of the TermDeclining Loan Declining Loan,and the Revolving Credit Loan and the Construction Loan are discussed in greater detail above. If we were to experience a 10% adverse change in LIBOR, the annual effect such change would have on our statement of operations, based on the amount we had outstanding on our variable interest rate loans at September 30, 2017,2022, would be approximately $72,000$56,000.


Commodity Price Risk


We expect to be exposed to market risk from changes in commodity prices.  Exposure to commodity price risk results from our dependence on corn in the ethanol production process and the sale of ethanol.


We seek to minimize the risks from fluctuations in the prices of raw material inputs, such as corn and natural gas, and finished products, such as ethanol and distillers grains, through the use of hedging instruments. In practice, as markets move, we

33

Table of Contents



actively manage our risk and adjust hedging strategies as appropriate. Although we believe our hedge positions accomplish an economic hedge against our future purchases and sales, management has chosen not to use hedge accounting, which would match the gain or loss on our hedge positions to the specific commodity purchase being hedged. We are using fair value accounting for our hedge positions, which means as the current market price of our hedge positions changes, the realized or unrealized gains and losses are immediately recognized in our cost of goods sold or as an offset to revenues. The immediate recognition of hedging gains and losses can cause net income to be volatile from quarter to quarter due to the timing of the change in value of the derivative instruments relative to the cost and use of the commodity being hedged.


We enter into forward contracts for our commodity purchases and sales on a regular basis.  It is our intent that, as we enter in to these contracts, we will use various hedging instruments to maintain a near even market position.  For example, if we have 1 million bushels of corn under fixed price contracts we would generally expect to enter into a short hedge position to offset our price risk relative to those bushels we have under fixed price contracts.  Because our ethanol marketing company is selling substantially all of the gallons it markets on a spot basis we also include the corn bushel equivalent of the ethanol we have produced that is inventory but not yet priced as bushels that need to be hedged.


At September 30, 2017,2022, we had a net longshort position of 210,00012,390,000 gallons of ethanol under derivative contracts used to hedge our future ethanol sales for various delivery periods through March 2018,2023, a net short (selling) position of 1,710,00010,080,000 bushels of corn under derivative contracts used to hedge our forward corn contracts, corn inventory and ethanol sales for various delivery periods through May 2019.December 2023. At September 30, 2017,2022, we had no open positions of soybean oil under derivative contracts used to hedge our future corn oil sales. At September 30, 2022, we had a net short (selling) position of 750,000
38

Table of Contents

1,235,000 bushels of soybeans under derivative contracts used to hedge its forward soybean purchase contracts for various periods through November 2023 that it had entered into for its new Trading Division. These derivatives have not been designated as an effective hedge for accounting purposes. There may be offsetting positions that are not shown on a net basis that could lower the notional amount of positions outstanding as disclosed above. At September 30, 2017,2022, we also had entered into certain forward purchase contracts for soybeans at fixed prices for which we elected to account for as derivatives. The following table provides details regarding the gains and (losses) from our derivative instruments in the statements of operations, none of which are designated as hedging instruments for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, September 30, 20162022, 2021 and September 30, 2015:2020:


Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Corn Derivative Contracts$(4,677,214)$(18,881,451)$2,196,868 
Ethanol Derivative Contracts(6,192,448)1,392,605 (5,484,019)
Natural Gas Derivative Contracts(39,039)(836)— 
Soybean Oil Derivative Contracts179,637 1,813,519 — 
Soybean Derivative Contracts(3,883,992)(6,518,841)(279,131)
Soybean Forward Purchase and Sales Contracts Derivatives(621,040)(894,717)970,344 
Totals$(15,234,096)$(23,089,721)$(2,595,938)
 Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
 September 30, 2017September 30, 2016September 30, 2015
Corn Derivative Contracts$2,003,473
$6,134,582
$1,306,174
Ethanol Derivative Contracts1,640,292
(218,066)(677,043)
Natural Gas Derivative Contracts205,523
(90,442)(68,635)
Soybean Derivative Contracts223,409


Soybean Forward Purchase Contracts Derivatives(327,005)
 
Totals$3,745,692
$5,826,074
$560,496


    At September 30, 2017,2022, we had forward corn purchase contracts at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through May 2019March 2024 for approximately 4.33%9.1% of our expected production needs for the next 2018 months. At September 30, 2017,2022, we also had forward dried distiller grains sales contracts at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through March 2018December 2022 for approximately 17.43%21.3% of expected production for the next 63 months and forward corn oil contracts at various prices for various delivery periods through December 2017October 2022 for approximately 65.82%101.86% of expected production for the next 3 months.month. Also, at September 30, 2017,2022, we had forward natural gas contracts for approximately 29.28%31.0% of expected purchases for the next 25 months at various prices for various delivery periods through October 2019.2024. We had no forward ethanol sales contracts at fixed prices as of September 30, 2017.2022.


We began operating our Trading Division in late September 2017. In preparation for beginning those operations, we entered into forward purchases contracts for soybeans. At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company had soybean forward purchase and sales contracts at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through July 2018December 2023 for approximately 7.39%12.9% of its anticipated trading volume of that commodity for the next 1015 months.


As contracts are delivered, any gains or losses realized will be recognized in our gross margin.  Due to the volatility and risk involved in the commodities market, we cannot be certain that these gains or losses will be realized. 


As corn prices move in reaction to market trends and information, our income statement will be affected depending on the impact such market movements have on the value of our derivative instruments. Depending on market movements, crop

34

Table of Contents



prospects and weather, these price protection positions may cause immediate adverse effects, but are expected to produce long-term positive growth for us.

A sensitivity analysis has been prepared to estimate our exposure to ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, corn, natural gas and soybeans price risk. Market risk related to these factors is estimated as the potential change in income resulting from a hypothetical 10% adverse change in the average cost of our corn and natural gas and average ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil and soybeans prices as of September 30, 20172022 net of the forward and future contracts used to hedge our market risk. The volumes are based on our expected use, purchase and sale of these commodities for a one year period from September 30, 2017.2022. The results of this analysis, which may differ from actual results, are approximately as follows:

39

Table of Contents

Estimated Volume Requirements for the next 12 months (net of forward and futures contracts)Unit of Measure
Hypothetical Adverse Change in Price as of
September 30, 2017
Approximate Adverse Change to IncomeEstimated Volume Requirements for the next 12 months (net of forward and futures contracts)Unit of MeasureHypothetical Adverse Change in Price as of
September 30, 2022
Approximate Adverse Change to Income
Natural Gas1,262,500
MMBTU10% $367,009
Natural Gas1,778,000 MMBTU10 %$1,203,000 
Ethanol130,000,000
Gallons10% $19,760,000
Ethanol138,000,000 Gallons10 %$32,499,000 
Corn40,710,063
Bushels10% $14,146,747
Corn40,784,000 Bushels10 %$27,652,000 
DDGs295,837
Tons10% $3,195,040
DDGs307,000 Tons10 %$6,745,000 
Corn Oil23,165,660
Pounds10% $671,804
Corn Oil40,176,000 Pounds10 %$2,812,000 
Soybeans8,445,899
Bushels10% $7,766,004
Soybeans - PurchaseSoybeans - Purchase4,234,000 Bushels10 %$5,652,000 
Soybeans - SaleSoybeans - Sale5,000,000 Bushels10 %$6,824,000 

For comparison purposes, the results of our sensitivity analysis as of September 30, 20162021, were approximately as follows:
Estimated Volume Requirements for the next 12 months (net of forward and futures contracts)Unit of MeasureHypothetical Adverse Change in Price as of
September 30, 2021
Approximate Adverse Change to Income
Natural Gas519,000 MMBTU10 %$304,000 
Ethanol138,000,000 Gallons10 %$30,319,000 
Corn39,986,000 Bushels10 %$21,873,000 
DDGs300,000 Tons10 %$5,339,000 
Corn Oil38,560,000 Pounds10 %$2,121,000 
Soybeans - Purchase3,336,000 Bushels10 %$4,039,000 
Soybeans - Sale5,000,000 Bushels10 %$6,155,000 
 Estimated Volume Requirements for the next 12 months (net of forward and futures contracts)Unit of Measure
Hypothetical Adverse Change in Price as of
September 30, 2016
Approximate Adverse Change to Income
Natural Gas1,969,000
MMBTU10% $561,000
Ethanol115,360,000
Gallons10% $17,765,000
Corn39,944,000
Bushels10% $13,262,000
DDGs288,000
Tons10% $3,403,000
Corn Oil26,766,000
Pounds10% $763,000

We had no price risk related to soybeans at September 30, 2016, as our Trading Division did not begin operations until the end of the fourth fiscal quarter of September 2017.


Liability Risk


We participate in a captive reinsurance company (the “Captive”).  The Captive reinsures losses related to worker's compensation, commercial property and general liability.  Premiums are accrued by a charge to income for the period to which the premium relates and is remitted by our insurer to the captive reinsurer.  The Captive reinsures catastrophic losses in excess of a predetermined amount.  Our premiums are structured such that we have made a prepaid collateral deposit estimated for losses related to the above coverage.  The Captive insurer has estimated and collected an amount in excess of the estimated losses but less than the catastrophic loss limit insured by the Captive. We cannot be assessed in excess of the amount in the collateral fund.




35
40

Table of Contents






ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



36





card-20220930_g2.jpg
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Members of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC and Subsidiaries
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of September 30, 20172022 and 2016,2021, and the related consolidated statements of operations, cash flows and changes in members'members’ equity, and cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2017. Cardinal Ethanol, LLC's management is responsible2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of September 30, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for theseeach of the years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements.statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on thesethe Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement.misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included considerationAs part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the company'sCompany’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessingstatements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion,Critical Audit Matters
Critical audit matters are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly, in allbe communicated to the audit committee and that (1) related to accounts or disclosures that are material respects,to the consolidated financial position of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC as of September 30, 2017statements and 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the fiscal years in the three-year period ended September 30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.



(2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgements. We determined that there were no critical audit matters.
/s/ Boulay PLLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.
Minneapolis, Minnesota
November 22, 2017



December 1, 2022
37
41

Table of Contents





CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets

 ASSETSSeptember 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Current Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$53,937,943 $25,798,906 
Restricted cash9,301,671 8,097,041 
Trade accounts receivable12,511,601 13,386,410 
Miscellaneous receivables1,114,588 404,273 
Inventories23,370,767 26,587,032 
Prepaid and other current assets464,498 212,261 
Futures and options derivatives972,041 964,418 
Forward purchase/sales derivatives360,620 988,919 
Total current assets102,033,729 76,439,260 
Property, Plant, and Equipment
Land and land improvements22,522,222 22,522,222 
Plant and equipment160,156,395 157,028,177 
Building8,913,364 8,913,364 
Office equipment948,749 922,124 
Vehicles31,928 31,928 
Construction in process19,624,102 2,424,760 
212,196,760 191,842,575 
Less accumulated depreciation(133,739,702)(122,442,930)
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net78,457,058 69,399,645 
Other Assets
Operating lease right of use asset, net6,808,992 4,840,250 
Investments1,656,049 1,259,770 
Total other assets8,465,041 6,100,020 
Total Assets$188,955,828 $151,938,925 
 ASSETSSeptember 30, 2017 September 30, 2016


 
Current Assets
 
Cash$18,995,755
 $23,002,139
Restricted cash401,406
 1,460,772
Trade accounts receivable15,006,093
 11,574,847
Miscellaneous receivables384,508
 135,517
Inventories14,604,975
 12,093,469
Prepaid and other current assets253,791
 248,999
Commodity derivative instruments492,842
 14,100
Total current assets50,139,370
 48,529,843


 
Property, Plant, and Equipment
 
Land and land improvements22,454,661
 21,124,597
Plant and equipment156,035,099
 144,157,818
Building7,018,061
 7,018,061
Office equipment814,842
 648,256
Vehicles31,928
 31,928
Construction in process1,522,246
 544,687

187,876,837
 173,525,347
Less accumulated depreciation(79,940,448) (69,064,269)
Property, Plant, and Equipment, Net107,936,389
 104,461,078


 
Other Assets
 
Investment1,096,237
 938,251
Total other assets1,096,237
 938,251


 
Total Assets$159,171,996
 $153,929,172



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.































38
42

Table of Contents





CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets

LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITYSeptember 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Current Liabilities
Accounts payable$4,426,732 $3,564,614 
Accounts payable - grain12,335,894 11,942,723 
Accrued expenses3,897,364 2,111,295 
Futures and options derivatives2,669,433 2,331,889 
Forward purchase/sales derivatives507,408 658,283 
Operating lease liability current3,594,335 3,132,242 
Total current liabilities27,431,166 23,741,046 
Long-Term Liabilities
Long-term debt9,000,000 — 
Operating lease long-term liabilities3,217,532 1,709,621 
Liability for railcar rehabilitation costs2,036,638 1,750,680 
Total long-term liabilities14,254,170 3,460,301 
Commitments and Contingencies
Members’ Equity
Members' contributions net of cost of raising capital, 14,606 units authorized, issued and outstanding70,912,213 70,912,213 
Retained earnings76,358,279 53,825,365 
Total members' equity147,270,492 124,737,578 
Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity$188,955,828 $151,938,925 
LIABILITIES AND MEMBERS' EQUITYSeptember 30, 2017 September 30, 2016


 
Current Liabilities
 
Accounts payable$3,983,923
 $2,472,212
Accounts payable-corn8,378,095
 4,761,547
Accrued expenses1,381,734
 1,213,753
Commodity derivative instruments513,829
 341,050
Current maturities of long-term debt3,749,826
 2,888,290
Total current liabilities18,007,407
 11,676,852


 
Long-Term Debt14,581,758
 11,932,063


 


 
Commitments and Contingencies
 


 
Members’ Equity
 
Member contributions net of cost of raising capital, 14,606 units authorized, issued and outstanding70,912,213
 70,912,213
Retained earnings55,670,618
 59,408,044
Total members' equity126,582,831
 130,320,257


 
Total Liabilities and Members’ Equity$159,171,996
 $153,929,172



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.



39
43

Table of Contents





CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Revenues$546,691,371 $404,002,166 $244,718,562 
Cost of Goods Sold460,306,891 369,373,828 239,426,482 
Gross Profit86,384,480 34,628,338 5,292,080 
Operating Expenses8,083,150 7,179,061 6,773,264 
Operating Income (Loss)78,301,330 27,449,277 (1,481,184)
Other Income (Expense)
Interest income6,152 — — 
Interest expense(36,560)(133,619)(180,348)
Miscellaneous income (expense)7,436,663 (205,780)521,099 
Income (loss) on equity method investment(3,721)— — 
Total7,402,534 (339,399)340,751 
Net Income (Loss)85,703,864 27,109,878 (1,140,433)
Weighted Average Units Outstanding - basic and diluted14,606 14,606 14,606 
Net Income (Loss) Per Unit - basic and diluted$5,868 $1,856 $(78)
Distributions Per Unit$4,325 $775 $150 

 Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended

 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015

 
 
 
Revenues $228,496,827
 $222,895,449
 $240,695,293

 
 
 
Cost of Goods Sold 209,241,617
 204,014,877
 197,305,291

 
 
 
Gross Profit 19,255,210
 18,880,572
 43,390,002

 
 
 
Operating Expenses 5,520,971
 5,233,634
 4,714,891

 
 
 
Operating Income 13,734,239
 13,646,938
 38,675,111

 
 
 
Other Income (Expense) 
 
 
Interest income 
 250
 
Interest expense (362,188) (185,870) (2,162)
Miscellaneous income 52,573
 60,477
 48,868
Total (309,615) (125,143) 46,706

 
 
 
Net Income $13,424,624
 $13,521,795
 $38,721,817
    
 
Weight Average Units Outstanding - basic and diluted 14,606
 14,606
 14,606

 
 
 
Net Income Per Unit - basic and diluted $919
 $926
 $2,651
    
 
Distributions Per Unit $1,175
 $1,630
 $3,500



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.











40
44

Table of Contents





CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Cash Flows from Operating Activities
Net income (loss)$85,703,864 $27,109,878 $(1,140,433)
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operations:
Depreciation and amortization11,296,772 11,296,401 11,251,736 
Change in fair value of commodity derivative instruments807,345 (125,703)258,417 
Loss of sale of equipment— 906,785 — 
Forgiveness of Paycheck Protection Program Loan— (856,665)— 
Non-cash lease expense1,262 — — 
Loss on equity method subsidiaries3,721 — — 
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
Trade accounts receivables874,809 (4,211,473)3,650,048 
Miscellaneous receivables(710,315)408,787 567,589 
Inventories3,216,265 (9,268,332)(3,878,892)
Prepaid and other current assets(252,237)(25,500)(56,297)
Contract liability— (15,000)15,000 
Accounts payable560,101 (429,407)1,152,561 
Accounts payable - grain393,171 6,268,938 (4,950,493)
Accrued expenses1,798,289 791,353 158,279 
Liability for railcar rehabilitation costs285,958 298,080 298,080 
Due to broker— — (1,589,324)
Net cash provided by operating activities103,979,005 32,148,142 5,736,271 
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
Capital expenditures— — (14,372)
Payments for construction in process(20,064,388)(3,846,527)(2,782,080)
Investment in Cardinal One Carbon Holdings(400,000)— — 
   Net cash used for investing activities(20,464,388)(3,846,527)(2,796,452)
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
Distributions paid(63,170,950)(11,319,650)(2,190,900)
Proceeds from revolving credit loan26,255,550 105,850,279 — 
Payments on revolving credit loan(26,255,550)(105,850,279)— 
Proceeds from long-term debt9,000,000 1,222,417 856,665 
Payments on long-term debt— (1,222,417)(6,725,722)
Net cash used for financing activities(54,170,950)(11,319,650)(8,059,957)



45

Table of Contents



Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended

September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015
 
 
  
Cash Flows from Operating Activities     
Net income$13,424,624
 $13,521,795
 $38,721,817
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operations:
 
  
Depreciation10,876,179
 9,698,309
 9,006,994
Change in fair value of commodity derivative instruments(3,745,692) (5,826,074) (560,496)
Gain on disposal of fixed asset(6,600) 
 (11,827)
Non-cash dividend income(157,986) (114,757) (104,941)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:
 
  


 
 
Trade accounts receivables(3,431,246) 387,510
 9,803,944
Miscellaneous receivable(248,991) 249,188
 (378,737)
Inventories(2,511,506) 1,660,983
 (6,329,053)
Prepaid and other current assets(4,792) 257,198
 23,264
Commodity derivative instruments3,439,729
 6,084,545
 1,032,359
Accounts payable1,511,712
 (1,144,090) 472,468
Accounts payable-corn3,616,548
 (1,995,627) 698,647
Accrued expenses(1,226,737) 428,512
 (2,172,452)
Net cash provided by operating activities21,535,242
 23,207,492
 50,201,987


 
  
Cash Flows from Investing Activities
 
  
Capital expenditures(571,366) (6,452,884) (27,686)
Payments for construction in process(12,385,407) (478,123) (10,531,521)
Proceeds from sale of equipment6,600
 
 35,000
   Net cash used for investing activities(12,950,173) (6,931,007) (10,524,207)


 
  
Cash Flows from Financing Activities
 
  
Distributions paid(17,162,050) (23,807,781) (51,121,002)
Proceeds from long-term debt6,475,952
 10,134,764
 4,865,236
Payments on long-term debt(2,964,721) (179,647) 
Net cash used for financing activities(13,650,819) (13,852,664) (46,255,766)


 
  
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash and Restricted Cash(5,065,750) 2,423,821
 (6,577,986)


 
  
Cash and Restricted Cash – Beginning of Period24,462,911
 22,039,090
 28,617,076


 
  
Cash and Restricted Cash – End of Period$19,397,161
 $24,462,911
 $22,039,090
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Net Increase (Decrease) in Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash29,343,667 16,981,965 (5,120,138)
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash – Beginning of Period33,895,947 16,913,982 22,034,120 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash – End of Period$63,239,614 $33,895,947 $16,913,982 
Reconciliation of Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash
Cash and Cash Equivalents - Balance Sheet$53,937,943 $25,798,906 $12,950,558 
Restricted Cash - Balance Sheet9,301,671 8,097,041 3,963,424 
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Restricted Cash$63,239,614 $33,895,947 $16,913,982 
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
Interest paid$4,010 $133,619 $259,451 
Supplemental Disclosure of Non-cash Investing and Financing Activities
Construction in process included in accrued expenses and accounts payable$343,140 $53,343 $301,724 
Construction period interest capitalized in property, plant and equipment$— $— $44,927 

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.



41
46

Table of Contents





CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash FlowsChanges in Members' Equity
Member Retained
Contributions EarningsTotal
Balance - September 30, 2019$70,912,213 $41,366,470 $112,278,683 
Net loss for year ended September 30, 2020 (1,140,433)(1,140,433)
Member Distributions (2,190,900)(2,190,900)
Balance - September 30, 2020$70,912,213 $38,035,137 $108,947,350 
Net income for year ended September 30, 2021 27,109,878 27,109,878 
Member Distributions (11,319,650)(11,319,650)
Balance - September 30, 2021$70,912,213 $53,825,365 $124,737,578 
Net income for year ended September 30, 2022 85,703,864 85,703,864 
Member Distributions (63,170,950)(63,170,950)
Balance - September 30, 2022$70,912,213 $76,358,279 $147,270,492 

Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended Fiscal Year Ended

September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016 September 30, 2015
      
Reconciliation of Cash and Restricted Cash     
Cash - Balance Sheet$18,995,755
 $23,002,139
 $20,827,614
Restricted Cash - Balance Sheet401,406
 1,460,772
 1,211,476
Cash and Restricted Cash$19,397,161
 $24,462,911
 $22,039,090
      
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
 
  
Interest paid$613,856
 $320,323
 $


 
  
Supplemental Disclosure of Noncash Investing and Financing Activities
 
  
Construction costs included in accrued expenses and accounts payable$1,461,282
 $66,564
 $836,609
Construction period interest capitalized in property, plant and equipment$263,261
 $174,594
 $



Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.




42
47

Table of Contents



CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Statements of Changes in Members' Equity

      
      
  Member  Retained 
  Contributions  Earnings 
Balance - September 30, 2014 $70,912,213
 $82,093,215
 
      
Net income for year ended September 30, 2015 
 38,721,817
 
      
Members Distributions 
 (51,121,002) 
      
Balance - September 30, 2015 70,912,213
 69,694,030
 
      
Net income for year ended September 30, 2016 
 13,521,795
 
      
Members Distributions 
 (23,807,781) 
      
Balance - September 30, 2016 70,912,213
 59,408,044
 
      
Net income for year ended September 30, 2017 
 13,424,624
 
      
Members Distributions 
 (17,162,050) 
      
Balance - September 30, 2017 $70,912,213
 $55,670,618
 


AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Financial Statements are an integral part of this Statement.


43


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to AuditedConsolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 20172022 and 20162021



1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES


Nature of Business


Cardinal Ethanol, LLC and Subsidiaries (the “Company”) is an Indiana limited liability company currently producing fuel-grade ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil and carbon dioxide near Union City, Indiana and sells these products throughout the continental United States. During the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the Company produced approximately 125,443,000, 119,815,000136,700,000, 136,100,000 and 117,000,000129,100,000 gallons of ethanol, respectively.


We have completed a construction project to add grain receivingIn addition, the Company procures, transports, and train loading facilities and additional rail spurs, track and grain storage to allow us to procure, transport and sellsells grain commodities through our new grain operations (the "Trading Division"operations.

Basis of Accounting

The Company prepared the accompanying consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America ("U.S. GAAP"). The Trading Division beganconsolidated financial statements include the operations, atassets and liabilities of the endCompany. In the opinion of our fourth fiscal quarterthe Company's management, the accompanying consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments, consisting of 2017. Although we bought soybeansnormal recurring accruals, necessary to fairly present the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Cardinal Ethanol, LLC and entered into forward purchase contractsits wholly owned subsidiaries, Cardinal Ethanol Export Sales, Inc. and Cardinal One Carbon Holdings, LLC (collectively, the Company). Cardinal Ethanol Export Sales, Inc. is an Interest Charge Domestic to International Sales Company ("IC-DISC") designed to take advantage of certain tax incentives for soybean purchasesexport sales to other countries. Cardinal One Carbon Holdings, LLC was formed to hold the partnership interest for the investigation and sales, wepursuit of carbon dioxide capture and sequestration. All inter-company balances and transactions have determined that the Trading Division was not material to our business at September 30, 2017 and therefore is not considered a reportable, separate business segment under ASC 280.been eliminated in consolidation.


Fiscal Reporting Period


The Company has adopted a fiscal year ending September 30 for reporting financial operations and a year ending December 31 for tax return purposes.


Reportable Segments

Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 280, “Segment Reporting,” establishes the standards for reporting information about segments in consolidated financial statements. Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available that are evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.   Based on the related business nature and expected financial results criteria set forth in ASC 280, the Company has two reportable operating segments for financial reporting purposes.

Ethanol Division. Based on the nature of the products and production process and the expected financial results, the Company’s operations at its ethanol plant, including the production and sale of ethanol and its co-products, are aggregated into one financial reporting segment.

Trading Division. The Company has a grain loading facility within the Company's single site to buy, hold and sell inventories of agricultural grains, primarily soybeans. The Company performs no additional processing of these grains, unlike the corn inventory the Company holds and uses in ethanol production. The activities of buying, selling and holding of grains other than for ethanol and co-product production comprise this financial reporting segment.

Accounting Estimates


Management uses estimates and assumptions in preparing these consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.U.S. GAAP. Those estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent
48

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
assets and liabilities, and the reported revenues and expenses. The CompanyEthanol Division uses estimates and assumptions in accounting for the following significant matters, among others: the useful life of fixed assets, inventories, the assumptions used in the analysis of the impairment of long lived assets, railcar rehabilitation costs, and inventory purchase commitments.

The Trading Division uses estimates and assumptions in accounting for the following significant matters, among others; the useful lives of fixed assets, the valuation of basisinventory purchase and delay price contracts on corn purchases,sale commitment derivatives inventory, patronage dividends, long-lived assets and inventory purchase commitments. at market.

Actual results may differ from previously estimated amounts, and such differences may be material to the consolidated financial statements. The Company periodically reviews estimates and assumptions, and the effects of revisions are reflected in the period in which the revision is made. Actual results could differ materially from those estimates.


Cash and Cash Equivalents


The Company maintains its accounts primarily at two financial institutions. At times throughout the year, the Company's cash balances may exceed amounts insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. Cash equivalents represent money market funds or short-term investments with original maturities of three months or less from the date of purchase, except for those amounts that are held in the investment portfolio for long-term investment.


Restricted Cash


As a part of its commodities hedging activities, the companyCompany is required to maintain cash balances with ourits commodities trading companies for initial and maintenance margins on a per futures contract basis. Changes in the market value of contracts may increase these requirements. As the futures contracts expire, the margin requirements also expire. Accordingly, we recordthe Company records the cash maintained with the traders in the margin accounts as restricted cash. Since this cash is immediately available to us upon request when there is a margin excess, we considerthe Company considers this restricted cash to be a current asset.


Trade Accounts Receivable


Credit terms are extended to customers in the normal course of business. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers' financial condition and, generally, requires no collateral. Accounts receivable are recorded at their estimated net realizable value. Accounts are considered past due if payment is not made on a timely basis in accordance with the Company's credit terms. Amounts considered uncollectible are written off. The Company's estimate of the allowance for doubtful accounts is based on historical experience, its evaluation of the current status of receivables, and unusual circumstances, if any. At September 30, 20172022 and 2016,2021, the Company determined that an allowance for doubtful accounts was not necessary.


44


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016




Inventories


InventoriesEthanol Division (see Reportable Segments) inventories consist of raw materials, work in process, finished goods and spare parts. Corn is the primary raw material. Finished goods consist of ethanol, dried distiller grains and corn oil. The Company, other than for its Trading Division, states inventoriesInventories are stated at the lower of weighted average cost or net realizable value. For its Trading Division, the Company states its grain inventories at market price less estimated disposition costs. Net realizable value is the estimated selling prices in the normal course of business, less reasonably predictable selling costs.


Trading Division (see Reportable Segments) inventories consist of grain. Soybeans were the only grains held and traded at September 30, 2022 and 2021. These inventories are stated at market value less estimated selling costs, which may include reductions for quality.

Property, Plant and Equipment


Property, plant, and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided over estimated useful lives by use of the straight linestraight-line depreciation method. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred; major improvements and betterments are capitalized. Construction in process expenditures will be depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful lives once the assets are placed into service.

49

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
 Minimum yearsMaximum years
Land improvements1520
Office building1040
Office equipment55
Process and grain handling equipment1020
Plant buildings1540
Minimum yearsMaximum years
Land improvements1520
Plant and equipment520
Building1040
Office equipment715
Vehicles55


Long-Lived Assets


The Company reviews its long-lived assets, such as property, plant and equipment and financing costs, subject to depreciation and amortization, for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. If circumstances require a long-lived asset be tested for possible impairment, the Company first compares undiscounted cash flows expected to be generated by an asset to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is not recoverable on an undiscounted cash flow basis, impairment is recognized to the extent that the carrying value exceeds its fair value. Fair value is determined through various valuation techniques including discounted cash flow models, quoted market values and third-party independent appraisals, as considered necessary. Management evaluated and determined no impairment write-downs were considered necessary for the fiscal years ending September 30, 2022, 2021, and 2020.


Investments


Investments consist of the capital stock and patron equities of the Company's distillers grains marketer. The investments areinvestment is stated at the lower of cost or fair value and adjusted for non cash patronage equities and cash equity redemptions received. PatronageNon-cash patronage dividends are recognized when received and included within revenue in the statements of operations.


The Company has also created certain subsidiaries to achieve some of its varying business interests that are not directly related to ethanol production or trading of grain. One has been formed as a corporation, while the other has been formed as a limited liability company (LLC) to hold interests in affiliated companies for carbon capture and underground sequestration (CCS). Through its LLC, the company owns a fifty percent interest in a joint venture which is accounted for as an equity method investment as described in detail in Note 16 - Equity Method Investments.

Revenue Recognition


Revenue is recognized upon transfer of control of promised products or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to receive in exchange for those products or services. The Company's contracts primarily consist of agreements with marketing companies and other customers as described below. The Company's performance obligations consist of the delivery of ethanol, distillers grains, corn oil, soybeans and carbon dioxide to its customers. The consideration the Company receives for these products is fixed based on current observable market prices at the Chicago Mercantile Exchange, generally, and adjusted for local market differentials. The Company's contracts have specific delivery modes, rail or truck, and dates. Revenue is recognized when the Company delivers the products to the mode of transportation specified in the contract, at the transaction price established in the contract, net of commissions, fees, and freight. The Company generally sells each of the products via different marketing channels as described below.

Ethanol. The Company sells its ethanol and related products pursuant tovia a marketing agreements. Revenues fromagreement with Murex, LLC. Murex buys one hundred percent of the Company's ethanol production of ethanolbased on agreements with end users at prices agreed upon mutually among the end user, Murex and the related productsCompany. Murex then provides a schedule of deliveries required and an order for each rail car or tankers needed to fulfill their commitment with the end user. These are recordedindividual performance obligations of the Company. The marketing agreement calls for control and title to pass when the customer has taken title and assumeddelivery vehicle is filled. Revenue is recognized then at the risks and rewards of ownership, prices are fixed or determinable and collectability is reasonably assured. The Company believes that there are no ethanol sales, during any given month, which should be considered contingent and recorded as deferred revenue. The Company's products are sold Free on Board (FOB) shipping point.

In accordanceprice in the agreement with the Company's agreements for the marketing and sale of ethanol and related products, marketing fees, commissions and freight due to the marketers are deducted from the gross sales price at the time incurred. Commissions were approximately $2,279,000, $2,352,000 and $2,372,000 for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Freight was approximately $10,027,000, $8,637,000 and $9,362,000 for the years ended September 30, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Revenue is recordedend user, net of these commissions, freight, and freight as they do not provide an identifiable benefit that is sufficiently separable from the sale of ethanol and related products.insurance.



45
50


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to AuditedConsolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 20172022 and 2016


2021

Distillers grains. The Company engages another third-party marketing company, CHS, Inc. to market one hundred percent of the distillers grains it produces at the plant. The process for selling the distillers grains is like that of ethanol, except that CHS takes title and control once a rail car is released to the railroad or a truck is released from the Company's scales. Prices are agreed upon among the three parties, and CHS provides schedule and orders representing performance obligations. Revenue is recognized net of commissions, freight, and fees.

Distillers corn oil (corn oil). The Company sells its production of corn oil directly to commercial customers. The customer is provided with a delivery schedule and pick up orders representing performance obligations. These are fulfilled when the customer's driver picks up the scheduled load. The price is agreed upon at the time each contract is made, and the Company recognizes revenue at the time of delivery at that price.

Carbon dioxide. The Company sells a portion of the carbon dioxide it produces to a customer that maintains a plant on-site for a set price per ton. Delivery is defined as transference of the gas from our stream to their plant.

Soybeans and other grains. The Company sells soybeans exclusively to commercial mills, processors or grain traders. Contracts are negotiated directly with the parties at prices based on negotiated prices.

Other. The Company engaged in ethanol sales to be processed for sanitizer during the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 as a result of a direct domestic need from COVID-19. The Company has since discontinued ethanol for sanitizer sales.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold include corn, trading division grains, natural gas and other components which includes processing ingredients, electricity, railcar lease, railcar maintenance, depreciation of ethanol production fixed assets and wages, salaries and benefits of production personnel.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses include wages, salaries and benefits of administrative employees at the plant, insurance, professional fees, depreciation of trading division fixed assets, property taxes and similar costs.

Derivative Instruments


From time to time the Company enters into derivative transactions to hedge its exposures to commodity price fluctuations. The Company is required to record these derivatives in the balance sheet at fair value.


In order for a derivative to qualify as a hedge, specific criteria must be met and appropriate documentation maintained. Gains and losses from derivatives that do not qualify as hedges, or are undesignated, must be recognized immediately in earnings. If the derivative does qualify as a hedge, depending on the nature of the hedge, changes in the fair value of the derivative will be either offset against the change in fair value of the hedged assets, liabilities, or firm commitments through earnings or recognized in other comprehensive income until the hedged item is recognized in earnings. Changes in the fair value of undesignated derivatives are recorded in the statement of operations, depending on the item being hedged.


Additionally, the Company is required to evaluate its contracts to determine whether the contracts are derivatives. Certain contracts that literally meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted as “normal purchases or normal sales”. Normal purchases and normal sales are contracts that provide for the purchase or sale of something other than a financial instrument or derivative instrument that will be delivered in quantities expected to be used or sold over a reasonable period in the normal course of business. Contracts that meet the requirements of normal purchases or sales are documented as normal and exempted from accounting and reporting requirements, and therefore, are not marked to market in our consolidated financial statements.

The Company has elected for its Ethanol Division to apply the normal purchase normal sale exemption to all forward commodity contracts except for its Trading Division.contracts. For the Trading Division, the Company has elected not to apply the normal purchase normal sale exemption to its forward purchase and sales contracts and therefore, treats them asmarks these derivative instruments.instruments to market.

51

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
Fair Value of Financial Instruments


The Company follows guidance for accounting for fair value measurements of financial assets and financial liabilities and for fair value measurements of nonfinancial items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the consolidated financial statements on a recurring and nonrecurring basis. The guidance establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to measurements involving significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 measurements). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:


Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date.
Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability.
Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.liability used to measure fair values to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at measurement date.


The level in the fair value hierarchy within which a fair measurement in its entirety falls is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.


The carrying value of cash, restricted cash, trade accounts receivable, miscellaneous receivables, treasury bills, accounts payable (other than those measured as fair value discussed in Note 8), accounts payable-grain, and accrued liabilitiesexpenses approximates fair value at September 30, 20172022 and 20162021 due to the short maturity nature of these instruments. The fair value of derivative instruments, Trading Division inventory, and debt is disclosed in Note 7.8.



Except for those assets and liabilities, which are required by authoritative accounting guidance to be recorded at fair value on our balance sheets, the Company has elected not to record any other assets or liabilities at fair value. No events occurred during the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017,2022, 2021, or 20162020 that required adjustment to the recognized balances of assets or liabilities, which are recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.


Environmental Liabilities


The Company's operations are subject to environmental laws and regulations adopted by various governmental entities in the jurisdiction in which it operates. These laws require the Company to investigate and remediate the effects of the release or disposal of materials at its location. Accordingly, the Company has adopted policies, practices and procedures in the areas of pollution control, occupational health, and the production, handling, storage and use of hazardous materials to prevent material environmental

46


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



or other damage, and to limit the financial liability, which could result from such events. Environmental liabilities are recorded when the liability is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. No liabilities were recorded at September 30, 20172022 or 2016.2021.


Net Income (Loss) per Unit


Basic net income (loss) per unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of members' units outstanding during the period. Diluted net income (loss) per unit is computed by dividing net income (loss) by the weighted average number of members' units and members' unit equivalents outstanding during the period. There were no member unit equivalents outstanding during the periods presented; accordingly, the Company's basic and diluted net income (loss) per unit are the same.


Income Taxes


Cardinal Ethanol, LLC and Subsidiaries is treated as a partnership for federal and state income tax purposes and generally does not incur income taxes.  Instead, income or losses are included in the income tax returns of the members and partners.  Accordingly, no provision or liability for federal or state income taxes has been included in these consolidated financial
52

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
statements.  The Company had no significant uncertain tax positions as of September 30, 20172022 or 2016.2021. Differences between the financial statement basis of assets and tax basis of assets is related to capitalization and amortization of organization and start-up costs for tax purposes, whereas these costs are expensed for financial statement purposes.  In addition, the Company uses the modified accelerated cost recovery system method (MACRS) for tax depreciation instead of the straight-line method that is used for book depreciation, which also causes temporary differences. For years before 2013,2018, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. Federal income tax examinations.


Recently Issued
2.REVENUE

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized at a single point in time when the Company satisfies its performance obligation under the terms of a contract with a customer. Generally, this occurs with the transfer of control of products or Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

Restricted Cash (Adopted)

In November 2016,services. Revenue is measured as the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-18, Restricted Cash, which amended Statementamount of Cash Flows (Topic 230) ofconsideration expected, as specified in the Accounting Standards Codification. The new guidance will require amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalentscontract with a customer, to be includedreceived in exchange for transferring goods or providing services.

Revenue by Source

All revenues from contracts with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows.customers under ASC Topic 606 are recognized at a point in time. The amendments will be effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has elected to adopt the amendments for the current statements presented for the fiscal years endedfollowing tables disaggregate revenue by major source:

Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 20172022
Ethanol DivisionTrading DivisionTotal
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC Topic 606
Ethanol$359,726,018 $— $359,726,018 
Distillers' Grains63,798,998 — 63,798,998 
Corn Oil27,656,525 — 27,656,525 
Carbon Dioxide473,449 — 473,449 
Other Revenue65,825 116,331 182,156 
Total revenues from contracts with customers451,720,815 116,331 451,837,146 
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC Topic 815 (1)
Soybeans and other grains— 94,854,225 94,854,225 
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives— 94,854,225 94,854,225 
Total Revenues$451,720,815 $94,970,556 $546,691,371 



53

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and we have applied2021
Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2021
Ethanol DivisionTrading DivisionTotal
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC Topic 606
Ethanol$251,922,325 $— $251,922,325
Distillers' Grains57,818,038 — 57,818,038 
Corn Oil17,966,544 — 17,966,544 
Carbon Dioxide484,752 — 484,752 
Other Revenue54,275 121,200 175,475 
Total revenues from contracts with customers328,245,934 121,200 328,367,134 
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC Topic 815 (1)
Soybeans and other grains— 75,635,032 75,635,032 
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives— 75,635,032 75,635,032 
Total Revenues$328,245,934 $75,756,232 $404,002,166 


Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2020

Ethanol DivisionTrading DivisionTotal
Revenues from contracts with customers under ASC Topic 606
Ethanol$157,704,059 $— $157,704,059 
Distillers' Grains41,687,109 — 41,687,109 
Corn Oil9,640,523 — 9,640,523 
Carbon Dioxide493,500 — 493,500 
Other Revenue2,048,527 87,450 2,135,977 
Total revenues from contracts with customers211,573,718 87,450 211,661,168 
Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives under ASC Topic 815 (1)
Soybeans and other grains— 33,057,394 33,057,394 
Total revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives— 33,057,394 33,057,394 
Total Revenues$211,573,718 $33,144,844 $244,718,562 

(1) Revenues from contracts accounted for as derivatives represent physically settled derivative sales that are outside the standard retrospectively.

Accounting for Leases (Evaluating)

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), which provides guidance for accounting for leases. The new guidance requires companies to recognize the assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by leased assets, initially measured at the present valuescope of the lease payments. The accounting guidance for lessors is largely unchanged. The ASU is effective for the Company beginning in October 2019. It is to be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the adoption of this guidance will have on the Company’s financial statements and anticipates the new guidance will significantly impact its financial statements given the Company has leased a significant number of rail cars for transporting Dried Distillers' Grains with Solubles (DDGS) to its ultimate customers.

Revenue Recognition (Evaluated)

In May 2014, and amended in August 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-09 which amended the ASC Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic(ASC Topic 606), where the company recognizes revenue when control of the Accounting Standards Codification. inventory is transferred within the meaning of ASC Topic 606 as required by ASC Topic 610-20, Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets.

Payment Terms

The core principleCompany has contractual payment terms with each respective marketer that sells ethanol and distillers grains. These terms are generally 7 - 14 days after the week of the new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount equal to the consideration the entity receives or expects to receive. control.

The guidance will be effectiveCompany has standard payment terms of net 10 days for theits sale of corn oil.

The Company beginning in October 2018. We have evaluated the impacthas standard payments terms due upon delivery for its sale of the standard on the financial statements and believe there will be no material effect aside for additional disclosure.soybeans.



47
54


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to AuditedConsolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 20172022 and 2016


2021

The contractual terms with the carbon dioxide customer calls for an annual settlement.
2.
Shipping and Handling Costs

Shipping and handling costs related to contracts with customers for sale of goods are accounted for as a fulfillment activity and are included in cost of goods sold. Accordingly, amounts billed to customers for such costs are included as a component of revenue.

Contract Liabilities

The Company records unearned revenue when consideration is received, or such consideration is unconditionally due, from a customer prior to transferring goods or services to the customer under the terms of its contracts with customers.

3. CONCENTRATIONS


Two major customers accounted for approximately 95%82% and 94%90% of the outstanding accounts receivable balance at September 30, 20172022 and September 30, 2016,2021, respectively. TheseThe same two customers, alsoin addition to one customer not included in the receivable concentration, account for approximately 93% of revenue for the year ended September 30, 2022. The same two customers accounted for approximately 96%81% of revenue for each of the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162021, and 2015.2020.


3.4.  INCOME TAXES
 
The differences between financial statement basis and tax basis of assets and liabilities at September 30, 20172022 and 20162021 are as follows:
 20222021
Financial statement basis of assets$188,955,828 $151,938,925 
Organization and start-up costs3,160,001 1,976,610 
Book to tax depreciation and amortization(48,551,783)(55,156,961)
Book to tax derivative instruments(967,461)(964,418)
Book to tax operating lease right of use asset(6,808,992)(4,840,250)
Capitalized inventory127,000 154,000 
Income tax basis of assets$135,914,593 $93,107,906 
Financial statement basis of liabilities$41,685,336 $27,201,347 
Book to tax derivative instruments(2,664,853)(2,331,889)
Book to tax operating lease liability(6,811,869)(4,841,863)
Accrued employee benefits(849,646)(713,233)
Accrued rail car rehabilitation costs(2,036,638)(1,750,680)
Income tax basis of liabilities$29,322,330 $17,563,682 

 2017 2016
Financial statement basis of assets$159,171,996
 $153,929,172
Organization and start-up costs1,976,610
 1,976,610
Book to tax depreciation and amortization(83,107,561) (83,786,100)
Book to tax derivative instruments(492,842) (14,100)
Capitalized inventory71,000
 62,000
Income tax basis of assets$77,619,203
 $72,167,582
    
Financial statement basis of liabilities$32,589,165
 $23,608,915
Book to tax derivative instruments(513,829) (341,050)
Accrued employee benefits(507,866) (508,471)
Income tax basis of liabilities$31,567,470
 $22,759,394

4.5. MEMBERS' EQUITY


The Company has one class of membership units, which include certain transfer restrictions as specified in the operating agreement and pursuant to applicable tax and securities laws. Income and losses are allocated to all members based upon their respective percentage of units held.


Distribution dates and amounts for the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2015 are listed in the table below:

Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution Paid
November 18, 2014 $1,700
 $24,830,200
 November 2014
February 10, 2015 1,000
 14,606,000
 February 2015
May 19, 2015 600
 8,763,600
 May 2015
August 18, 2015 200
 2,921,202
 August 2015
Totals $3,500
 $51,121,002
  

Distribution dates and amounts for the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2016 are listed in the table below:


48


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution Paid
November 17, 2015 $500
 $7,303,000
 November 2015
February 9, 2016 300
 4,381,800
 February 2016
May 17, 2016 230
 3,359,380
 June 2016
August 16, 2016 600
 8,763,601
 August 2016
Totals $1,630
 $23,807,781
  

Distribution dates and amounts for the fiscal year endedSeptember 30, 2017 are listed in the table below:

Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution Paid
November 15, 2016 $600
 $8,763,600
 December 2016
February 14, 2017 200
 2,921,200
 February 2017
May 16, 2017 275
 4,016,650
 May 2017
August 14, 2017 100
 1,460,600
 August 2017
Totals $1,175
 $17,162,050
  

Subsequent to year end, the board of directors declared a cash distribution. The date and amounts2022 are listed in the table below:


55

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution To Be PaidDate DeclaredDistribution Declared Per UnitTotal Distribution AmountMonth Distribution Paid
November 21, 2017 $400
 $5,842,400
 December 2017
November 16, 2021November 16, 2021$650 $9,493,900 November 2021
February 15, 2022February 15, 20221,500 21,909,000 March 2022
May 17, 2022May 17, 2022675 9,859,050 June 2022
August 16, 2022August 16, 20221,500 21,909,000 August 2022
TotalsTotals$4,325 $63,170,950 



In November 2022, the Company declared a distribution of $500 per unit for a total distribution of $7,303,000.

5.Distribution dates and amounts for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2021 are listed in the table below:

Date DeclaredDistribution Declared Per UnitTotal Distribution AmountMonth Distribution Paid
November 17, 2020$100 $1,460,600 November 2020
February 9, 2021150 2,190,900 February 2021
June 15, 2021200 2,921,200 June 2021
August 17, 2021325 4,746,950 August 2021
Totals$775 $11,319,650 


Distribution dates and amounts for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2020 are listed in the table below:

Date DeclaredDistribution Declared Per UnitTotal Distribution AmountMonth Distribution Paid
February 18, 2020$150 $2,190,900 February 2020
Totals$150 $2,190,900 





56

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
6.  INVENTORIES


Inventories consist of the following as of September 30, 20172022 and 2021:
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Ethanol Division:
 Raw materials$7,206,914 $2,995,914 
 Work in progress2,442,453 2,331,419 
 Finished goods7,513,988 12,431,375 
 Spare parts4,178,807 3,978,193 
Ethanol Division Subtotal$21,342,162 $21,736,901 
Trading Division:
Grain inventory$2,028,605 $4,850,131 
Trading Division Subtotal2,028,605 4,850,131 
Total Inventories$23,370,767 $26,587,032 

The Company did not have a net realizable value write-down of ethanol inventory for the years ended September 30, 2016:2022 and 2021. The Company had a net realizable write-down of ethanol inventory of approximately $10,000 for the year ended September 30, 2020.

 September 30, 2017 September 30, 2016
 Raw materials$5,754,084
 $4,677,336
 Work in progress1,354,346
 1,252,919
 Finished goods2,722,869
 3,638,427
 Spare parts2,633,371
 2,524,787
 Total Ethanol Division$12,464,670
 $12,093,469
Soybeans - Trading Division, at market2,140,305
 
Totals$14,604,975
 $12,093,469


In the ordinary course of its ethanol business, the Company enters into forward purchase contracts for its commodity purchases and sales. Certain contracts for the ethanol division that literally meet the definition of a derivative may be exempted from derivative accounting as normal purchases or normal sales. At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company had forward corn purchase contracts at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through May 2019March 2024 for approximately 4.33%9% of expected production needs for the next twenty18 months. Given the uncertainty

49


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



of future ethanol and corn prices, the Company could incur a loss on the outstanding corn purchase contracts in future periods. Management has evaluated these forward contracts and its inventories using the lower of cost or net realizable value evaluation, and has determined that no impairment existed at September 30, 20172022 and September 30, 2016.2021. At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company has forward natural gas purchase contracts for approximately 29.28%31.0% of expected usage for the next twenty-five25 months at various prices for various delivery periods through October 2019.2024. The Company has no forward ethanol sales contracts at fixed prices at September 30, 2017. It2022. The Company did have dried distiller grains sales contracts for approximately 17.43%21.3% of expected production for the next 3 months through March 2018 andDecember 2022. The Company had forward corn oil sales contracts for approximately 65.82%101.86% of expected production for the next three months1 month at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through December 2017.October 2022. Also, the Company purchased corn from a related party during the year totaling approximately $284,000.$993,000.


As referred to previously, the Company began operating its Trading Division in late September 2017. Preceding that, the Company entered into forward purchases contracts for soybeans. At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company had soybean forward purchase contracts at various fixed prices for various delivery periods through July 2018December 2023 for approximately 7.39%12.9% of its anticipated trading volume of that commodity for the next 1015 months. Also, the Company purchased soybeans from a related party during the year totaling approximately $54,000.


6.7. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS


The Company enters into corn, ethanol, natural gas and soybean derivative instruments, which are required to be recorded as either assets or liabilities at fair value in the balance sheet. Derivatives qualify for treatment as hedges when there is a high correlation between the change in fair value of the derivative instrument and the related change in value of the underlying hedged item. The Company must designate the hedging instruments based upon the exposure being hedged as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge or a hedge against foreign currency exposure. The Company formally documents, designates, and assesses the effectiveness of transactions that receive hedge accounting initially and on an on-going basis.


Commodity Contracts


The Company enters into commodity-based derivatives, for corn, ethanol, soybeans, soybean oil, and natural gas in order to protect cash flows from fluctuations caused by volatility in commodity prices and to protect gross profit margins from potentially adverse effects of market and price volatility on commodity based purchase commitments where the prices are set at
57

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
a future date. These derivatives are not designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes. For derivative instruments that are not accounted for as hedges, or for the ineffective portions of qualifying hedges, the change in fair value is recorded through earnings in the period of change. The changes in the fair market value of ethanol derivative instruments are included as a component of revenue.  The changes in the fair market value of corn, and natural gas, soybean oil, and soybean derivative instruments are included as a component of cost of goods sold.


At September 30, 2017,2022, the CompanyEthanol Division had a net short (selling) position of 1,710,00010,080,000 bushels of corn under derivative contracts used to hedge its forward corn purchase contracts, corn inventory and ethanol sales. The CompanyEthanol Division had a net long (buying)short (selling) position of 2,800,0007,471,740 bushels of corn under derivative contracts as of September 30, 2016.2021. Most of these corn derivatives are traded on the Chicago Board of Trade and are forecasted to settle for various delivery periods through May 2019December 2023 as of September 30, 2017.2022. The CompanyEthanol Division had a net long (buying)short (selling) position of 210,00012,390,000 gallons of ethanol under derivative contracts used to hedge its future ethanol sales.sales as of September 30, 2022. The CompanyEthanol Division had a net long (buying) position of 630,0001,050,000 gallons of ethanol under derivative contracts as of September 30, 2016.2021. These ethanol derivatives are traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange and are forecasted to settle for various delivery periods through March 2018,2023, as of September 30, 2017.2022. The Ethanol Division had no open positions of soybean oil under derivative contracts as of September 30, 2022. At September 30, 2017,2021, the Company uses natural gasEthanol Division had a net long (buying) position of 4,020,000 pounds of soybean oil under derivative contracts as of September 30, 2021 with various delivery periods through December 2021.

At September 30, 2022, the Trading Division had a net short (selling) position of 1,235,000 bushels of soybeans under derivative contracts used to hedge its forward natural gas purchases.soybean purchase contracts. These soybean derivatives are traded on the Chicago Board of Trade and are forecasted to settle for various period through November 2023 as of September 30, 2022. The CompanyTrading Division had a net long (buying)short (selling) position 380,000 MMBTUs of natural gas1,768,111 bushels of soybeans under derivative contracts as of September 30, 2016. These natural gas derivatives are traded on the New York Mercantile Exchange.2021. These derivatives have not been designated as effective hedges for accounting purposes.


At September 30, 2017, the Company had a net short (selling) position of 750,000 bushels of soybeans under derivative contracts used to hedge its forward soybean purchase contracts that it had entered into for its new Trading Division.

The following table provides balance sheet details regarding the Company's derivative financial instruments at September 30, 2017:2022:

50


InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilities
Ethanol futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$— $841,470 
Corn futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$— $1,827,963 
Soybean futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$972,041 $— 
Soybean forward purchase and sales contractsForward Purchase/Sales Derivatives$360,620 $507,408 
TableAs of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



InstrumentBalance Sheet Location Assets Liabilities
      
Ethanol futures and options contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $
 $89,019
Corn futures and options contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $489,531
 $
Soybean futures and options contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $
 $175,338
Soybean forward purchase contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $3,311
 249,473

As of September 30, 20172022, the Company had approximately $401,000$9,300,000 of cash collateral (restricted cash) related to ethanol, corn, and soybean derivatives held by three brokers.


The following table provides balance sheet details regarding the Company's derivative financial instruments at September 30, 2016:2021:
58

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
InstrumentBalance Sheet Location Assets Liabilities
      
Ethanol derivative contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $
 $188,475
Corn derivative contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $
 $152,575
Natural gas derivative contractsCommodity Derivative Instruments - Current $14,100
 
InstrumentBalance Sheet LocationAssetsLiabilities
Ethanol futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$150,339 $— 
Corn futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$— $2,331,889 
Soybean oil futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$84,474 $— 
Soybean futures and options contractsFutures and Options Derivatives$729,605 $— 
Soybean forward purchase and sales contractsForward Purchase/Sale Derivatives$988,919 $658,283 


As of September 30, 20162021, the Company had approximately $1,461,000$8,100,000 of cash collateral (restricted cash) related to ethanol, corn, soybean oil, and cornsoybean derivatives held by two brokers.


The following table provides details regarding the gains and (losses) from the Company's derivative instruments in the statements of operations, none of which are designated as hedging instruments for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017:2022:


InstrumentStatement of Operations LocationAmount
Ethanol Futures and Options ContractsRevenues$(6,192,448)
Corn Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(4,677,214)
Natural Gas Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(39,039)
Soybean Oil Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold179,637 
Soybean Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(3,883,992)
Soybean Forward Purchase and Sales ContractsCost of Goods Sold(621,040)
Totals$(15,234,096)
InstrumentStatement of Operations LocationAmount
Corn Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold$2,003,473
Ethanol Futures and Options ContractsRevenues1,640,292
Natural Gas Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold205,523
Soybean Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold223,409
Soybean Forward Purchase ContractsCost of Goods Sold(327,005)
Totals $3,745,692


The following table provides details regarding the gains and (losses) from the Company's derivative instruments in the statements of operations, none of which are designated as hedging instruments for the fiscal year ended ended September 30, 2016:2021:

InstrumentStatement of Operations LocationAmount
Ethanol Futures and Options ContractsRevenues$1,392,605 
Corn Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(18,881,451)
Natural Gas Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(836)
Soybean Oil Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold1,813,519 
Soybean Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(6,518,841)
Soybean Forward Purchase and Sales ContractsCost of Goods Sold(894,717)
Totals$(23,089,721)

59
InstrumentStatement of Operations LocationAmount
Corn Derivative ContractsCost of Goods Sold$6,134,582
Ethanol Derivative ContractsRevenues(218,066)
Natural Gas Derivative ContractsCost of Goods Sold(90,442)
Totals $5,826,074


51


CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to AuditedConsolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 20172022 and 2016


2021

The following table provides details regarding the gains and (losses) from the Company's derivative instruments in the statements of operations, none of which are designated as hedging instruments for the fiscal year ended ended September 30, 2015:2020:

InstrumentStatement of Operations LocationAmount
Ethanol Futures and Options ContractsRevenues$(5,484,019)
Corn Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold2,196,868 
Natural Gas Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold— 
Soybeans Futures and Options ContractsCost of Goods Sold(279,131)
Soybean Forward Purchase and Sales ContractsCost of Goods Sold970,344 
Totals$(2,595,938)

InstrumentStatement of Operations LocationAmount
Corn Derivative ContractsCost of Goods Sold$1,306,174
Ethanol Derivative ContractsRevenues(677,043)
Natural Gas Derivative ContractsCost of Goods Sold(68,635)
Totals $560,496

7.8. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
 
The following table provides information on those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017:2022:


InstrumentsInstrumentsCarrying AmountFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Corn Futures and Options ContractsCorn Futures and Options Contracts$(1,827,963)$(1,827,963)$(1,827,963)$— $— 
Ethanol Futures and Options ContractsEthanol Futures and Options Contracts$(841,470)$(841,470)$(841,470)$— $— 
DerivativesCarrying AmountFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Corn Futures and Options Contracts$489,351
$489,351
$489,351
$
$
Ethanol Futures and Options Contracts$(89,019)$(89,019)$(89,019)$
$
Soybean Futures and Options Contracts$(175,338)$(175,338)$(175,338)$
$
Soybean Futures and Options Contracts$972,041 $972,041 $972,041 $— $— 
Soybean Forward Purchase Contracts$(246,162)$(246,162)$
$(246,162)$
Soybean Forward Purchase Contracts$(146,788)$(146,788)$— $(146,788)$— 
Soybean Inventory$2,140,305
$2,140,305
$
$2,140,305
$
Soybean Inventory$2,028,605 $2,028,605 $— $— $— 
Accounts PayableAccounts Payable$(4,379,251)$(4,379,251)$— $(4,379,251)$— 
Treasury BillsTreasury Bills$(33,228,697)$(33,228,697)$— $— $— 
The following table provides information on those assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2016:2021:

InstrumentsCarrying AmountFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Corn Futures and Options Contracts$(2,331,889)$(2,331,889)$(1,424,775)$(907,114)$— 
Ethanol Futures and Options Contracts$150,339 $150,339 $150,339 $— $— 
Soybean Oil Futures and Options Contracts$84,474 $84,474 $84,474 $— $— 
Soybean Futures and Options Contracts$729,605 $729,605 $1,066,775 $(337,170)$— 
Soybean Forward Purchase Contracts$330,637 $330,637 $— $330,637 $— 
Soybean Inventory$4,850,131 $4,850,131 $— $4,850,131 $— 
Accounts Payable$(6,391,350)$(6,391,350)$— $(6,391,350)$— 

60

DerivativesCarrying AmountFair ValueLevel 1Level 2Level 3
Corn Derivative Contracts$(152,575)$(152,575)$174,969
$(327,544)$
Ethanol Derivative Contracts$(188,475)$(188,475)$(188,475)$
$
Natural Gas Derivative Contracts$14,100
$14,100
$14,100
$
$
Table of Contents

CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
We determine the fair value of commodity derivative instruments utilizing Level 1 inputs by obtaining fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data that may include dealer quotes and live trading levels from the Chicago Board of Trade market and New York Mercantile Exchange.

We determine the fair value of treasury bill Level 1 inputs by obtaining fair value measurements from an independent pricing service. The fair value measurements consider observable data based on quoted market prices in active markets.

We determine the fair value of corn and natural gassoybean futures and options levelLevel 2 instruments by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs are observable in the markets noted above. Soybean forward purchase and sale contracts are reported at fair value using Level 2 inputs from current contract prices that are being issued by the Company.


Soybean inventory held in the trading division is reported at fair value using levelLevel 2 inputs which are based on purchases and sales transactions that occurred on or near September 30, 2017.2022 and 2021.


Accounts payable is generally stated at historical amounts with the exception of approximately $4,379,000 and $6,391,000 at September 30, 2022 and 2021, respectively, related to certain delivered inventory for which the payable fluctuates based on changes in commodity prices. These payables are hybrid financial instruments for which the Company has elected the fair value option.

The Company believes the fair value of it'sits long-term debt at September 30, 2017 and September 30, 20162022 approximated the carrying value of approximately $18,332,000$9,000,000 and $14,820,000, respectively. Fair value was estimated using estimated market interest ratesis considered to be a Level 2 input. The Company did not have any long-term debt at September 30, 2017 and 2016, which considered to be level 2 inputs.2021. The fair values and carrying values consider the terms of the related debt and exclude the impacts of discounts and derivative/hedging activity.



52


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



8.9.  BANK FINANCING


The Company has a loan agreement consisting of fourtwo loans, the Term Loan, Declining Revolving Loan (Declining Loan), and the Revolving Credit Loan and the Construction Loan in exchange for liens on all property (real and personal, tangible and intangible) which include, among other things, a mortgage on the property, a security interest on commodity trading accounts and assignment of material contracts. The loan agreement assigns an interest rate of LIBOR plus 290 basis points (2.9%)based on the U.S. prime rate published daily in the Wall Street Journal to each of the individual loans. The Revolving Credit Loan is assigned the one month LIBOR rate which changes on the first day of every month. The Term Loan, the Revolving Loan and the Construction Loan each have interest charged based on the ninety day (three month) LIBOR rate. The interest rate is assigned at the beginning of the ninety day period and not allon each of the loans have the same interest rate beginning and ending dates.
On July 23, 2015, the Company executed a Fifth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement with First National Bank of Omaha ("FNBO") in order to obtain additional financing to fund a construction project to add storage capacity and increase production capacity at the plant. On February 28, 2016, the Company executed a Sixth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement with FNBO extending the termination date of the Revolving Credit Loan to February 28, 2017. On May 6, 2016, the Company executed a Seventh Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement with FNBO extending the draw period and conversion date of the Declining Loan to July 31, 2016 and also amended the definition of permitted liens effective March 1, 2016. On September 7, 2016, the Company executed an Eighth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement to be effective as of July 31, 2016, with FNBO (the "Eighth Amendment"). The Eighth Amendment converts $15,000,000 of the principal balance on the Declining Loan, which was used for construction advances, to amortizing term debt and reduces the availability of the Declining Loan from $20,000,000 to $5,000,000 with such amount to be available for working capital purposes. Pursuant to the Eighth Amendment, the interest rate on the Term Loan is the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninety basis points. The Eighth Amendment provides for monthly installment payments of approximately $282,700 commencing on September 1, 2016, with a final maturity date of February 28, 2021. Subsequent to the fiscal year ended September 30, 2016, the Company executed a Ninth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement to be effective as of September 30, 2016, with FNBO (the "Ninth Amendment"). The purpose of the Ninth Amendment was to clarify that principal and interest on the Term Loan shall be payable in equal monthly installments of approximately $282,700 commencing on September 1, 2016 until maturity when the outstanding principal balance and all accrued and unpaid interest shall be due and payable in full.
On March 23, 2017, we executed the Tenth Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement to be effective as of February 28, 2017, which amends the First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Agreement dated June 10, 2013 (the "Amendment"). The primary purpose of the Amendment was to provide additional financing to fund a construction project which is adding grain receiving and train loading facilities and additional rail spurs, track and grain storage to provide the flexibility to receive and ship additional grain commodities (the Construction Loan). In connection therewith, we also executed a Disbursing Agreement, Construction Note and a Third Amendment of First Amended and Restated Construction Loan Mortgage, Security Agreement, Assignment of Leases and Rents and Fixture Financing Statement.

The Amendment provides for a construction loan in the maximum principal amount of $10,000,000 with an interest rate equal to the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninety basis points. The financing is secured by a mortgage on all of our real property and a security interest in all other assets, both tangible and intangible. The Amendment provides for monthly interest payments on the Construction Note during the draw period and then the principal balance of the construction advances is expected to be converted, on or before November 30, 2017, to term debt amortized over approximately seven years with a final maturity date of February 28, 2023. The Amendment provides for a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.15:1.0 measured quarterly on a rolling four quarter average basis if our working capital is less than $25,000,000 for any reporting period. The Amendment also provides for a new debt service charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.25:1.0 measured quarterly on a rolling four quarter average basis, in lieu of the fixed charge coverage ratio, if our working capital is equal to or more that $25,000,000. The minimum $15,000,000 working capital requirement remains in place from a prior amendment as well. The Amendment modifies the capital expenditures covenant to limit those expenditures to $7,000,000 during the 2017 fiscal year, returning the limit to $5,000,000 for subsequent fiscal years. The grain loading and shipping project is excluded from the calculation. Finally, the Amendment extends the termination date of the Revolving Credit Loan from February 28, 2017 to February 28, 2018 and amends the mortgage to add the additional 64 acres of land purchased in October 2016.


53


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



changes daily.
Declining NoteLoan


The maximum availability of the Declining Loan iswas formerly $5,000,000 and such amount iswas to be available for working capital purposes. There were no borrowings outstanding onHowever, the maximum availability of the Declining Loan was increased from $5,000,000 to $36,000,000 in order to provide financing to fund the construction and installation of a high protein feed system at September 30, 2017 or at September 30, 2016.the plant. The interest rate on the TermDeclining Loan is currently based on the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninetyprime rate minus five basis points.points (.05%) subject to a floor of 2.85%. The interest rate on the Declining Loan at September 30, 20172022 and 2016 were 4.20%2021 was 6.20% and 3.75%3.10%, respectively.

Term Loan

The Company is required to make monthly interest ratepayments on the TermDeclining Loan during the draw period. The principal balance of the Declining Loan is expected to be converted to term debt on or before February 1, 2024, to be repaid in 60 equal monthly installments based on a ten year amortization period. In addition, the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninety basis points. The interest rateCompany will be required to make mandatory annual prepayments on the Termterm debt within 120 days following the end of each fiscal year beginning with the fiscal year ended September 30, 2024. The annual prepayment will be in the amount of the lesser of 40% of excess cash flow (as defined in the agreement) or $7,200,000, up to an aggregate prepayment amount of $18,000,000. The Company had borrowings outstanding of $9,000,000 on the Declining Loan at September 30, 2017 was 4.20%. There were2022 and no borrowings in the amount of approximately $11,856,000 outstanding on the Term Loan at September 30, 2017 and $14,820,000 at September 30, 2016. The Term Loan requires monthly installment payments of principal and interest of approximately $282,700 commencing on September 1, 2016, with a final maturity date of February 28, 2021.


Revolving Credit Loan


The Revolving Credit Loan has a limit of $15,000,000$20,000,000 supported by a borrowing base made up of the Company's corn, ethanol, dried distillers grain, and corn oil and soybean inventories reduced by accounts payable associated with those inventories having a priority. It is also supported by the eligible accounts receivable and commodity trading account excess margin funds. The interest rate on the Revolving Credit Loan is based on the 1-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninetyprime rate minus twenty-five basis points.points (.25%) and is subject to a floor of 2.75%. The interest ratesrate at September 30, 20172022 and 2016 were 4.14%2021 was 6.00% and 3.43%3.00%, respectively. There were no borrowings
61

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
outstanding on the Revolving Credit Loan at September 30, 2017 or 2022 and September 30, 2016.

Construction Loan

2021. The Construction Loan has a limit of $10,000,000. The interest rate on the ConstructionRevolving Credit Loan is basedset to mature on the 3-month LIBOR plus two hundred ninety basis points and at September 30, 2017 was 4.22%. There were borrowings in the amount of approximately $6,476,000 outstanding on the Construction Loan at September 30, 2017 and no borrowings on the Construction Loan at September 30, 2016. During the fiscal year ended September 30, 2017, we have capitalized $263,000 of interest related to the various improvement and construction projects. This compares with $175,000 capitalized in the same period ended September 30, 2016.February 28, 2023.


These loans are subject to protective covenants, which require the Company to maintain various financial ratios. The covenants include a working capital requirement of $15,000,000, and a capital expenditures covenant that allows the Company $5,000,000 of expenditures per year without prior approval. The cost of the high protein feed system is excluded from the capital expenditures calculation until the principal balance of the Declining Loan converts to term debt. There is also a requirement to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.15:1.0 measured quarterly. A debt service charge coverage ratio of no less than 1.25:1.0 in lieu of the fixed charge coverage ratio will apply for any reporting period that working capital is equal to or more than $23,000,000.


Long-term debt, as discussed above, consists of the followingamount drawn on the Declining Note of $9,000,000 at September 30, 2017:2022 with no amounts due within one year.

Term note$11,855,632
Construction Loan6,475,952
Less amounts due within one year3,749,826
       Net long-term debt$14,581,758


The estimated maturities of long-term debt at September 30, 20172022 are as follows:



October 1 2023 to September 30, 2024— 
October 1 2024 to September 30, 20251,219,364 
October 1 2025 to September 30, 20261,651,220 
October 1 2026 to September 30, 20271,756,553 
October 1 2027 to September 30, 20281,868,610 
Thereafter2,504,253 
Total long-term debt$9,000,000 

10. LEASES

The Company leases rail cars for its facility to transport ethanol and dried distillers grains to its end customers. Operating lease right of use assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. The Company uses its estimated incremental borrowing rate, unless an implicit rate is readily determinable, as the discount rate for each lease in determining the present value of lease payments. At September 30, 2022, the Company’s weighted average discount rate was 5%. Operating lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease or contains a lease at inception. The Company’s leases have remaining lease terms of approximately 1 year to 2.5 years, which may include options to extend the lease when it is reasonably certain the Company will exercise those options. At September 30, 2022, the weighted average remaining lease term was 2 years. The Company does not have lease arrangements with residual value guarantees, sale leaseback terms or material restrictive covenants. The Company does not have any material finance lease obligations nor sublease agreements.

The following table summarizes the remaining maturities of the Company’s operating lease liabilities at September 30, 2022:

For the Fiscal Year Ending September 30,
2023$3,842,130 
20242,863,180 
2025444,380 
Totals7,149,690 
Amount representing interest(337,823)
Lease liabilities$6,811,867 

54
62


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to AuditedConsolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 20172022 and 2016


2021

October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018$3,749,826
October 1, 2018 to September 30, 20193,913,660
October 1, 2019 to September 30, 20204,083,990
October 1, 2020 to September 30, 20213,560,650
October 1, 2021 to September 30, 20223,023,458
Total long-term debt$18,331,584

9. LEASES

At September 30, 2017,2022, the Company hadrecorded operating lease costs of approximately $3,851,000 in cost of goods sold in the following commitments for paymentsCompany’s statement of rentals underoperations. At September 30, 2021, the Company recorded operating leases which at inception had a non-cancellable termlease costs of more than one year:approximately $2,209,000 against ethanol revenue and $918,000 in cost of goods sold in the Company's statement of operations.


  Total
October 1, 2017 to September 30, 2018 $1,171,870
October 1, 2018 to September 30, 2019 959,400
October 1, 2019 to September 30, 2020 918,000
October 1, 2020 to September 30, 2021 918,000
October 1, 2021 to September 30, 2022 153,000
Thereafter 
Total minimum lease commitments $4,120,270

Rent expense for operating leases was approximately $1,167,000 and $1,163,000 for 2017 and 2016, respectively.

10.11. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Marketing Agreement


The Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated company for the purpose of marketing and selling all the distillers grains the Company is expected to produce. The buyer agrees to remit a fixed percentage rate of the actual selling price to the Company for distillers dried grain solubles and wet distiller grains. The agreement may be terminated by either party at its unqualified option, by providing written notice of not less than 120 days to the other party.


The Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated company to sell all of the ethanol the Company produces at the plant. The Company agrees to pay a commission of a fixed percent of the net purchase price for marketing and distribution. In July 2009, the initial term of the agreement was extended to eight years and the commission increased in exchange for reducing the payment terms from 2014 days to 7 days after shipment. In November 2012, the Company amended this agreement to extend the initial term of the agreement to eleven years, expiring in 2019, in exchange for capping the commissions at $1,750,000$1,750,000 per year. Effective November 18, 2018, the two companies amended the marketing agreement. The amendment added a renewal term to the initial agreement that extended the contract until November 30, 2022. It provided for the payment of the commission to Murex to be calculated on each net gallon of ethanol taken under the agreement. It modified how the cost of rail car shipments are charged to the Company, moving from a per gallon fee to requiring that the marketer provide a minimum 225 rail cars to the Company on a per car per month lease basis as described in Note 10. Finally, it reduced the delivery to payment period. On September 14, 2022, the Company executed an amendment to extend the term until December 31, 2024, subject to automatic renewals thereafter for one-year periods unless either party gives notice of non-renewal at least 90 days prior to the end of the current term. The agreement may also be terminated due to the insolvency or intentional misconduct of either party or upon the default of one of the parties as set forth in the agreement. In addition, the amendment added a provision that allows the Company to terminate the agreement on 90 days prior written notice upon a "Material Change in Control". Upon termination of the agreement for any reason, the Company may be obligated to continue to deliver ethanol for a period of time to cover certain contractual commitments for which the Company gave prior written approval. The amendment also provides for certain adjustments to the purchase price for sales made to the marketer for its own account or for sales of exported ethanol. If this adjusted price can not be finalized at time of payment, the parties may agree upon a provisional price which shall be trued up later. The amendment will be effective on December 1, 2022.


Rail Car Rehabilitation Costs

The Company leases 180 hopper rail cars under a multi-year agreement which ends in November 2023. Under the agreement, the Company is required to pay to rehabilitate each car for "damage" that is considered to be other than normal wear and tear upon turn in of the car(s) at the termination of the lease. Company management has estimated total costs to rehabilitate the cars at September 30, 2022, to be approximately $2,037,000. During the year ended September 30, 2022, the Company has recorded an expense in cost of goods totaling $317,000. The Company accrues the estimated cost of railcar damages over the term of the lease.

Utility Agreement


The Company entered into a natural gas services contract with an initial term of ten years and automatic renewals for up to three consecutive one year periods. Under the contract, the Company agrees to pay a fixed transportation charge per therm delivered for the first five years. For the remaining five years,contract term, the fixed transportation charge will be increased by the compounded inflation rate (as determined by the Consumer Price Index). The contract commenced in November 2008 when plant operations began.


The Company has a commitment to buy electricity from a utility. The Company pays the utility company monthly pursuant to their standard rates.



55
63


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to AuditedConsolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 20172022 and 20162021



Development Agreement


In September 2007, the Company entered into a development agreement with Randolph County Redevelopment Commission (“the Commission”) to promote economic development in the area. Under the terms of this agreement, beginning in January 2008 through December 2028, the money the Company pays toward property tax expense is allocated to an expense and an acquisition account. The funds in the acquisition account can be used by the Commission to purchase equipment, at the Company's direction, for the plant. The Company does not have title to or control over the funds in the acquisition account, no amounts have been recorded in the balance sheet relating to this account.

Tax abatement

In October 2006, During the real estate that the plant was developed on was determinedyears ended September 30, 2022 and 2021, no amounts were refunded to be an economic revitalization area, which qualified the Company for tax abatement. The abatement period is for a 10 year term, with an effective date beginning calendar year end 2009 for the property taxes payable in calendar year 2011.and used to offset costs of capital expenditures.


Carbon Dioxide Agreement


In March 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with an unrelated party to sell the raw carbon dioxide gas produced as a byproduct at the Company's ethanol production facility. As part of the agreement, the unrelated company leased a portion of the Company's property to construct a carbon dioxide liquefaction plant. The Company shallagreed to supply raw carbon dioxide to the plant at a rate sufficient for production of 150 tons of liquid carbon dioxide per day and will receive a price of $5.00$5.00 per ton of liquid carbon dioxide shipped, with price incentives for increased production levels specified in the contract. The Company shallis to be paid for a minimum of 40,000 tons each year or approximately $200,000$200,000 annually. The initial term of the agreement is for a period of ten years commencing on the start-up date of the plant, but no later than June 1, 2010 and will automatically renew for two additional five year terms thereafter unless otherwise terminated pursuant to the agreement. The carbon dioxide liquefaction plant began operations in June 2010. In November 2011, the Company amended this agreement to allow for an expansion of the carbon dioxide liquefaction plant. Under the amendment, the Company shall bewas paid for a new minimum of 98,700 tons each year or approximately $493,500$493,500 annually. The amendment took effect in September 2012.

Energy Management Agreement

On March 27, 2015,November 26, 2019, the Company sent advance written notice of termination to U.S. Energy Services, Inc. of the Energy Management Agreement dated January 23, 2006 between the Company and U.S. Energy Services, Inc. (the “U.S. Energy Agreement”).  The termination of the U.S. Energy Agreementagreement which was to be effective on June 1, 2015. 2020. However, due to disruptions related to COVID-19, the Company agreed to rescind the termination and extend the agreement one year to June 1, 2021.


In June 2021, the Company amended the agreement, to increase the price to $7.00 per ton subject to an annual 2% price increase. However, in the event of a take or pay shortfall, the price paid for the shortfall per ton is reduced by $1.00. The U.S. Energy Agreement was replaced by anamendment also allows the Company to do anything it wishes with carbon dioxide gas it produces in excess of the quantity it is obligated to sell provided that if the Company sells to others in direct competition then the annual take or pay obligation shall be reduced accordingly and the agreement we executed on April 1, 2015, with Capstone Energy Services, LLC (the "Capstone Agreement").may be terminated. The initial term of the Capstone Agreement commenced on June 1, 2015, andagreement continues for one yearuntil May 31, 2026, with automatic one-year renewal periods thereafter unless earlier terminated dueby either party by providing at least six months written notice prior to an event of default. Following the expiration of the initial one-year term,term. In addition, after the Capstonethree year anniversary of the effective date, the Company has certain rights to terminate upon the occurrence of a "Change of Control Event" or if the Company decides to sequester its carbon dioxide.

High Protein System Installation Agreement will

On January 20, 2022, the Company contracted with ICM, Inc. to install a system to produce high protein feed which is expected to cost approximately $50,000,000 including recent change orders, and be on a month-to-month basisfunded from operations and mayfrom our current credit facilities as amended. This project is expected to be terminatedcompleted by either party upon sixty days prior written notice.Fall of 2023.


Legal Proceedings and Contingencies

The Company is subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. While the ultimate outcome of these matters is not presently determinable, it is in the opinion of management that the resolution of outstanding claims will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Due to the uncertainties in the settlement process, it is at least reasonably possible that management's view of outcomes will change in the near term.


In February 2010, a lawsuit against the Company was filed by an unrelated party claiming the Company's operation of the oil separation system infringed its patent.is a patent infringement. In connection with the lawsuit, in February 2010, the agreement for the construction and installation of the tricanter oil separation system was amended. In this amendment the manufacturer and installer of the tricanter oil separation system indemnifies the Company against all claims of infringement of patents, copyrights or other intellectual property rights from the Company's purchase and use of the tricanter oil system and agrees to defend the Company in the lawsuit filed at no expense to the Company. On October 23, 2014, the court granted summary judgment finding that all of the patents claimed were invalid and that the Company had not infringed. In addition, on September 15, 2016, the United States District Court granted summary judgment finding that the patents were invalid due to inequitable conduct before the US Patent and Trademark

56


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



Office by the inventors and their attorneys. However, theseThe rulings arehave since been affirmed on appeal and on February 22, 2021 the U.S. Supreme Court declined to review the decision. On March 3, 2022, the United States District Court ruled on attorney fees to be awarded to the defendants. A supplemental award of attorney fees was issued on August 10, 2022.

64

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
The Company is subject to appeal. legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of its business. While the ultimate outcome of these matters is not presently determinable, it is in the opinion of management that the resolution of outstanding claims will not have a material adverse effect on the financial position or results of operations of the Company. Due to the uncertainties in the settlement process, it is at least reasonably possible that management's view of outcomes will change in the near term.
Insurance Recovery

The manufacturer has,Company received insurance proceeds of approximately $556,000 from a loss on grain that was unusable. The loss was recorded during the year ended September 30, 2021 and the Company expects it will continue, to vigorously defend itself andinsurance proceeds were received during the Company in these lawsuits and any appeal.year ended September 30, 2022.


If the ruling was to be successfully appealed, the Company estimates that damages sought in this litigation if awarded would be based on a reasonable royalty to, or lost profits of, the plaintiff. If the court deems the case exceptional, attorney's fees may be awarded and are likely to be $1,000,000 or more. The manufacturer has also agreed to indemnify the Company for these fees. However, in the event that damages are awarded, if the manufacturer does not fully indemnify the Company for any reason, the Company could be liable. In addition, the Company may need to cease use of its current oil separation process and seek out a replacement or cease oil production altogether.

11.12. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN


The Company has a defined contribution plan available to all of its qualified employees. TheEffective January 2022, the Company contributes 100% of employee contributions up to 3%5% of the eligible wages of each employee and an additional 50% of employee contributions up to 5%, for a total contribution by the Company of 4% of eligible wages.employee. The plan is a safe harbor plan where the Company match is guaranteed prior to the beginning of the year. Employees are eligible after six months of service. The Company contributed approximately $113,000,$147,000, $121,000 and $110,000$103,000 to the defined contribution plan during the years ended September 30, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.


12.13. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES IMPACTING THE ETHANOL INDUSTRY AND OUR FUTURE OPERATIONS


The Company has certain risks and uncertainties that it experiences during volatile market conditions, which can have a severe impact on operations. The Company's revenues are derived from the sale and distribution of ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil to customers primarily located in the U.S. Corn for the production process is supplied to the plant primarily from local agricultural producers and from purchases on the open market. EthanolDuring the fiscal year ended September 30, 2022, ethanol sales averageaveraged approximately 83%66% of total revenues and corn costs average 79%averaged 67% of total cost of goods sold.


The Company's operating and financial performance is largely driven by prices at which the Company sells ethanol, distillers grains and corn oil, and the related cost of corn. The price of ethanol is influenced by factors such as supply and demand, weather, government policies and programs, and the unleaded gasoline markets and the petroleum markets, although, since 2005, the prices of ethanol and gasoline began a divergence with ethanol selling for less than gasoline at the wholesale level. Excess ethanol supply in the market, in particular, puts downward pressure on the price of ethanol. The Company's largest cost of production is corn. The cost of corn is generally impacted by factors such as supply and demand, weather, government policies and programs. The Company's risk management program is used to protect against the price volatility of these commodities.


Economic conditions for the ethanol industry have been favorable during fiscal year 2022. However, the military invasion of Ukraine by Russia in the second quarter of fiscal year 2022 and sanctions imposed by other countries as a result have created global economic uncertainty and contributed to increased inflation, significant market disruptions and increased volatility in commodity prices such as corn, oil and natural gas. The economic impact of this war and the potential effects on the Company's operating and financial performance is currently unknown. Additionally, there have been economic indicators that the United States could be facing a possible recession which have primarily resulted from interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve in an attempt to reduce inflation. The Company continues to monitor economic conditions that might affect our profitability. The Company believes that its cash on hand and available debt from its lender will provide sufficient liquidity to meets its anticipated working capital, debt service and other liquidity needs through the next twelve months. If market conditions worsen affecting the Company's ability to profitably operate the plant or if the Company is unable to transport ethanol, it may be forced to further reduce the ethanol production rate or even temporarily shut down ethanol production altogether.
13.
On May 23, 2022, the Company received an award of approximately $7,652,000 from the United States Department of Agriculture ("USDA") under the Biofuel Producer Program. The Biofuel Producer Program was created as part of the Coronavirus Aid Relief and Economic Security Act. The USDA announced that the funds were made available to provide economic relief to biofuels producers who faced unexpected market losses due to the COVID-19 pandemic and support a significant market for agricultural producers who supply products used in biofuel production. This award was unconditional and was recognized as a component of other income on the statement of operations during the year ended September 30, 2022.
65

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021

14. BUSINESS SEGMENTS

The Company has two reportable operating segments. Segment reporting is intended to give financial statement users a better view of how the Company manages and evaluates its businesses. The accounting policies for each segment are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. Segment income or loss does not include any allocation of shared-service costs.  Segment assets are those that are directly used in or identified with segment operations. Inter-segment balances and transactions have been eliminated.
The following tables summarize financial information by segment and provide a reconciliation of segment revenue, gross profit, grain inventories, operating income, and total assets:
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Revenue:
Ethanol division$451,720,815 $328,245,934 $211,573,718 
Trading division94,970,556 75,756,232 33,144,844 
Total Revenue$546,691,371 $404,002,166 $244,718,562 
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Gross Profit:
Ethanol division$82,638,679 $32,646,809 $3,562,929 
Trading division3,745,801 1,981,529 1,729,151 
Total Gross Profit$86,384,480 $34,628,338 $5,292,080 
Fiscal Year Ended
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021September 30, 2020
Operating Income (Loss):
Ethanol division$75,824,501 $26,736,720 $(1,941,363)
Trading division2,476,829 712,557 460,179 
Total Operating Income (Loss)$78,301,330 $27,449,277 $(1,481,184)

66

Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2022 and 2021
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Grain Inventories:
Ethanol division$7,206,914 $2,995,914 
Trading division2,028,605 4,850,131 
Total Grain Inventories$9,235,519 $7,846,045 
September 30, 2022September 30, 2021
Total Assets:
Ethanol division$188,059,041 $142,760,396 
Trading division900,652 8,793,484 
Total Assets$188,955,828 $151,938,925 


15.    QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)


Summary quarterly results are as follows:
  
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2022  
Revenues$150,256,949 $133,972,682 $133,261,052 $129,200,688 
Gross profit34,918,608 10,151,570 28,653,656 12,660,646 
Operating income32,783,235 8,103,233 26,732,866 10,681,996 
Net income32,395,164 8,429,214 34,173,727 10,705,759 
Basic and diluted earnings per unit$2,218 $577 $2,340 $733 
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2017       
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2021Fiscal year ended September 30, 2021  
Revenues$58,054,764
 $59,473,502
 $50,900,700
 $60,067,861
Revenues$93,239,981 $97,911,947 $117,272,974 $95,577,264 
Gross profit8,604,588
 4,455,502
 253,179
 5,941,941
Gross profit529,355 8,762,330 9,607,941 15,728,712 
Operating income (Loss)7,417,831
 3,020,636
 (1,258,167) 4,553,939
Net income (Loss)7,298,037
 2,901,298
 (1,237,591) 4,462,880
Operating income (loss)Operating income (loss)(1,283,302)6,925,219 7,849,027 13,958,333 
Net income (loss)Net income (loss)(1,055,854)6,865,441 7,745,750 13,554,542 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit$500
 $199
 $(85) $305
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit$(72)$470 $530 $928 

  
First
Quarter
Second
Quarter
Third
Quarter
Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2020  
Revenues$63,736,851 $67,278,692 $51,252,061 $62,450,958 
Gross profit (loss)2,988,044 (4,221,538)1,657,936 4,867,638 
Operating income (loss)1,293,302 (6,147,899)67,815 3,305,598 
Net income (loss)1,638,760 (6,200,182)35,096 3,385,893 
Basic and diluted earnings (loss) per unit$112 $(424)$$232 

57


Table of Contents
CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Notes to Audited Financial Statements
September 30, 2017 and 2016



  
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2016       
Revenues$57,545,036
 $51,589,923
 $53,951,547
 $59,808,943
Gross profit3,150,962
 2,989,165
 4,464,503
 8,275,942
Operating income1,781,357
 1,502,959
 3,237,759
 7,124,863
Net income1,744,134
 1,422,174
 3,254,249
 7,101,238
Basic and diluted earnings per unit$119
 $97
 $223
 $487

  
First
Quarter
 
Second
Quarter
 
Third
Quarter
 
Fourth
Quarter
Fiscal year ended September 30, 2015       
Revenues$65,858,591
 $59,944,217
 $53,978,969
 $60,913,516
Gross profit21,316,731
 5,350,271
 6,259,132
 10,463,868
Operating income19,962,726
 4,202,249
 5,119,545
 9,390,591
Net income19,986,184
 4,205,473
 5,122,566
 9,407,594
Basic and diluted earnings per unit$1,368
 $288
 $351
 $644

The above quarterly financial data is unaudited, but in the opinion of management, all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of the selected data for these periods presented have been included.


58
67


16.    EQUITY METHOD INVESTMENTS

The Company, through its wholly owned subsidiary, Cardinal One Carbon Holdings, LLC, owns a fifty percent interest in a limited partnership. That partnership was formed as a joint venture with another unrelated investor to investigate and pursue carbon dioxide capture and underground sequestration. The Company accounts for this investment using joint venture accounting and, therefore, under the equity method. Cardinal One Carbon Holdings, LLC was formed on June 22, 2022 to hold the partnership interest in the limited partnership and began its administrative operations on September 1, 2022.

The Company's policy related to investments in both common stock and in-substance common stock that give the Company the ability to exercise significant influence over the operating and financial polices of an entity in which it invests even though the Company holds 50% or less of the common stock or in-substance common stock (or both common and in-substance common stock) is to account for such investment under the equity method. The Company considers its financial position and results of operations in evaluating the extent of disclosures of the financial position and results of operations of an entity in which the Company invests.

As the Company owns a fifty percent interest in the limited partnership, an investment in affiliate of $396,279 was reflected on the consolidated balance sheet as of September 30, 2022. A loss on equity method investment of $3,721 was reflected on the consolidated statement of operations for the year ended September 30, 2022.
68

Table of Contents



ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE


Boulay PLLP (PCAOB ID #542) has been our independent auditor since the Company's inception and is the Company's independent auditor at the present time. We have had no disagreements with our auditor.


ITEM 9A.  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
 
Disclosure Controls and Procedures


Our management is responsible for maintaining disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms. In addition, the disclosure controls and procedures must ensure that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required financial and other required disclosures.


Our management, including our Chief Executive Officer (the principal executive officer), JeffJeffrey L. Painter, along with our Chief Financial Officer (the principal financial officer), William Dartt, have reviewed and evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of September 30, 2017.2022.  Based on this review and evaluation, these officers have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods required by the forms and rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission; and to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by an issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management including our principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.


Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Inherent Limitations Over Internal Controls


Our internal control over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
    (i)    pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;
    (ii)    provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and
    (iii)    provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the consolidated financial statements.


Management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that our internal controls will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of internal controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, any evaluation of the effectiveness of controls in future periods are subject to the risk that those internal controls may become inadequate because of changes in business conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

5969

Table of Contents



Management's Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting


Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the criteria set forth in the 2013 Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of September 30, 2017.2022.


This annual report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. As we are a non-accelerated filer, management's report is not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 that permit us to provide only management's report in this annual report.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting


There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter of our 20172022 fiscal year, which were identified in connection with management’s evaluation required by paragraph (d) of rules 13a-15 and 15d-15 under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.


ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
    
Subsequent to year end, the board of directors declared a cash distribution. The date and amount is listed in the table below:    None.


Date Declared Distribution Declared Per Unit Total Distribution Amount Month Distribution To Be Paid
November 21, 2017 $400
 $5,842,400
 December 2017
ITEM 9C.    DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS


Not applicable.

PART III


ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the definitive proxy statement for our 20182023 Annual Meeting of Members to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after the end of our 20172022 fiscal year. This proxy statement is referred to in this report as the 20182023 Proxy Statement.
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 20182023 Proxy Statement.


ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED MEMBER MATTERS
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 20182023 Proxy Statement.


ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
 
The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 20182023 Proxy Statement.


ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES


The information required by this Item is incorporated by reference from the 20182023 Proxy Statement.


60
70

Table of Contents




PART IV


ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES.


The following exhibits and consolidated financial statements are filed as part of, or are incorporated by reference into, this report:
 
(1)
Financial Statements

(1)Consolidated Financial Statements

The consolidated financial statements appear beginning at page 3842 of this report.


(2)
Financial Statement Schedules

(2)Financial Statement Schedules

All supplemental schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.


     (3)Exhibits

Exhibit No.ExhibitFiled HerewithIncorporated by Reference
3.1Exhibit 3.1 to the registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File 333-131749) filed on February 10, 2006.
3.1AExhibit 3.1A to the registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File 333-131749) filed on February 10, 2006.
3.2Exhibit 3.2 to the registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File 333-131749) filed on February 10, 2006.
4.13.2AExhibit 3.1 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on May 8, 2018
4.1Exhibit 4.24.1 to the registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File 333-131749) filed on February 10, 2006.
10.14.2Registrant's registration statement on Form SB-2 (Commission File 333-131749) filed on February 10, 2006.
10.1Exhibit 10.19 to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on December 22, 2006.
10.2Exhibit 10.21 to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on December 22, 2006.
10.3Exhibit 10.25 to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on December 22, 2006.
10.4Exhibit 10.29 to the registrant's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on February 14, 2007.
71

Table of Contents
10.5Exhibit 10.32 to the registrant's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on May 15, 2007.
10.6Exhibit 10.33 to the registrant's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on May 15, 2007.

61

Table of Contents



10.7Exhibit 10.34 to the registrant's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 3, 2007.
10.8Exhibit 10.37 to the registrant's Form 10-KSB filed with the Commission on December 17, 2007.
10.9Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form 10-QSB filed with the Commission on August 14, 2008
10.10Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on July 7, 2009.
10.11Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 28, 2009.
10.12Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 14, 2010.
10.13Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 14, 2010.
10.14Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 12, 2010.
10.15Exhibit 10.35 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 13, 2011
10.16Exhibit 10.36 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 13, 2011
10.17Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013
72

Table of Contents
10.18Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013
10.19Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013
10.20Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013

62

Table of Contents



10.21Exhibit 10.6 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013
10.22Exhibit 10.7 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on August 7, 2013
10.23


Exhibit 10.39 to the registrant's Form10-K filed with the Commission on November 27, 2013.
10.24Exhibit 10.40 to the registrant's Form10-K filed with the Commission on November 27, 2013.
10.25Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 6, 2014.
10.26Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 2, 2015.
10.27Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on April 23, 2015.
10.28Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 5, 2015.
10.29Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on August 4, 2015.
10.30Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on August 4, 2015.
73

Table of Contents
10.31Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 9, 2016.
10.32Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 9, 2016.
10.33Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 9, 2016
10.34Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 9, 2016
10.35Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 9, 2016
10.36Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 9, 2016

63

Table of Contents



10.37Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 7, 2016
10.38Exhibit 10.43 to the registrant's Form10-K filed with the Commission on November 22, 2016.
10.39Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2017.
10.4010.39Exhibit 10.2 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2017.
10.4110.40Exhibit 10.3 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2017.
10.4210.41Exhibit 10.4 to the registrant's Form10-Q filed with the Commission on May 8, 2017.
10.4310.42Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on November 29, 2017
10.43Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 30, 2018
10.44Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 30, 2018
10.45Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 28, 2018
74

Table of Contents
10.46Exhibit 10.47 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 21, 2018
10.47Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 8, 2019
10.48Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 8, 2019
10.49XExhibit 10.51 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 22, 2019
14.110.50Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 23, 2020
10.51Exhibit 991. to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 30, 2020
10.52Exhibit 10.52 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 18, 2020
10.53Exhibit 10.53 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 18, 2020
10.54Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on February 4, 2021
10.55Exhibit 10.1 to the registrant's Form 10-Q filed with the Commission on May 5, 2021
10.56Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 16, 2021
10.57Exhibit 10.57 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on November 17, 2021
10.58Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on January 25, 2022
10.59Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2022
10.60Exhibit 99.2 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2022
10.61Exhibit 99.3 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2022
10.62Exhibit 99.4 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2022
75

Table of Contents
10.63Exhibit 99.5 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on March 31, 2022
10.64Exhibit 99.1 to the registrant's Form 8-K filed with the Commission on September 16, 2022
10.65X
14.1Exhibit 14.1 to the registrant's Form 10-K filed with the Commission on December 13, 2012
31.1X
31.2X
32.1X
32.2X
101The following financial information from Cardinal Ethanol, LLC'sLLC and Subsidiaries' Annual Report for the Fiscal Year Ended September 30, 2017,2022, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 20172022 and September 30, 2016,2021, (ii) Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended September 30, 2017, 2016,2022, 2021, and 2015,2020, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Members' Equity, and (iv) the Notes to Financial Statements.**
101.INSInline XBRL Instance Document - the instance document does not appear on the Interactive Data File because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document.
101.PREInline XBRL Presentation Linkbase Document.
104 Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in the Interactive Data Files submitted as Exhibit 101).


(+)     Confidential Treatment Requested.Requested
(X)    Filed herewith
(*)    Confidential Treatment Redacted
76

Table of Contents
(**)    Furnished herewith



ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY

    None.

SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

64

Table of Contents



CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC AND SUBSIDIARIES
Date:December 1, 2022CARDINAL ETHANOL, LLC
Date:November 22, 2017/s/ Jeffrey L. Painter
Jeffrey L. Painter
President and Chief Executive Officer and President
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ William Dartt
William Dartt
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
    

6577

Table of Contents



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the foregoing persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.


Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Robert J. Davis
Robert J. Davis, Chairman and Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Dale Schwieterman
Dale Schwieterman, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Tom Chalfant
Tom Chalfant, Vice Chairman and Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ J. Phillip Zicht
J. Phillip Zicht, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Ralph BrumbaughDanny Huston
Ralph Brumbaugh,Danny Huston, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Thomas C. Chronister
Thomas C. Chronister, Secretary and Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ David M. Dersch, Jr.
David M. Dersch, Jr., Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Steven J. Snider
Steven J. Snider, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Cyril G. LeFevre
Cyril G. LeFevre, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ C. Allan RosarGerald Forsythe
C. Allan Rosar,Gerald Forsythe, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ William R. Garth
William R. Garth, Director
Date:November 22, 2017
Robert Baker, Director
Date:November 22, 2017December 1, 2022/s/ Lewis M. Roch III
Lewis M. Roch III, Director



66
78