0001357204 dnkn:ForeignMember 2019-12-28
 
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
____________________________ 
FORM 10-K
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the year ended December 31, 201628, 2019
OR
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934.
For the transition period from             to             
Commission file number 001-35258
____________________________ 
DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware 20-4145825
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
130 Royall Street
Canton, Massachusetts02021
(Address of principal executive offices) (zip code)
(781) (781) 737-3000
(Registrants’ telephone number, including area code)
____________________________ 
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading Symbol(s)Name of each exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.001 par value per shareDNKNThe NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: NONE
____________________________ 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yesx    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    Yes  ¨Nox
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yesx    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yesx    No  ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer”filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “smaller reporting“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filerx Accelerated filer¨
     
Non-accelerated filer¨ Smaller Reporting Companyreporting company¨
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting stock of the registrant held by non-affiliates of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. computed by reference to the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market as of June 25, 201629, 2019, was approximately $3.886.59 billion.
As of February 17, 201720, 2020, 91,937,29682,576,313 shares of common stock of the registrant were outstanding.
____________________________ 
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for the 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A not later than 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Form 10-K, are incorporated by reference in Part III, Items 10-14 of this Form 10-K.
 






DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Page
Part I.
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.3.
Item 4.
 
Part II.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
 
Part III.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
 
Part IV.
Item 15.
Item 16.






Forward-Looking Statements
This report on Form 10-K, as well as other written reports and oral statements that we make from time to time, includes statements that express our opinions, expectations, beliefs, plans, objectives, assumptions or projections regarding future events or future results and therefore are, or may be deemed to be, “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Generally these statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “feel,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “should” or “would” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements include all matters that are not historical facts.
By their nature, forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties because they relate to events and depend on circumstances that may or may not occur in the future. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report and in our other public filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC.
Although we base these forward-looking statements on assumptions that we believe are reasonable when made, weWe caution you that forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and that our actual results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate may differ materially from those made in or suggested by the forward-looking statements contained in this report. In addition, even if our results of operations, financial condition and liquidity, and the development of the industry in which we operate, are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this report, those results or developments may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods.
Given these risks and uncertainties, you are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or to publicly announce the results of any revisions to any of those statements to reflect future events or developments.






PART I
Item 1. Business.
Our Company
We are one of the world’s leading franchisors of quick service restaurants (“QSRs”) serving hot and cold coffee and baked goods, as well as hard serve ice cream. We franchise restaurants under our Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins brands. With over 20,00021,000 points of distribution in more than 60 countries worldwide, we believe that our portfolio has strong brand awareness in our key markets.
We believe that our 100% franchised business model offers strategic and financial benefits. For example, because we generally do not own or operate restaurants, our Company is able to focus on menu innovation, marketing, franchisee coaching and support, and other initiatives to drive the overall success of our brand.brands. Financially, our franchised model allows us to grow our points of distribution and brand recognition with limited capital investment by us.
We operatereport our business in fourfive segments: Dunkin’ Donuts U.S., Dunkin’ Donuts International, Baskin-Robbins International, and Baskin-Robbins U.S., and U.S. Advertising Funds. In fiscal year 2016,2019, our Dunkin’ Donuts segments generated revenues of $630.9$672.8 million, or 79%51% of our total segment revenues, of which $608.0$646.1 million was in the U.S. segment and $22.9$26.7 million was in the international segment. In fiscal year 2016,2019, our Baskin-Robbins segments generated revenues of $166.5$160.5 million, of which $119.0$112.4 million was in the international segment and $47.5$48.1 million was in the U.S. segment. In fiscal year 2019, our U.S. Advertising Funds segment generated revenues of $473.6 million. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there were 12,25813,137 Dunkin’ Donuts points of distribution, of which 8,8289,630 were in the U.S. and 3,4303,507 were international, and 7,8228,160 Baskin-Robbins points of distribution, of which 5,2845,636 were international and 2,5382,524 were in the U.S. See note 1211 to our consolidated financial statements included herein for segment information.
We generate revenue from fourfive primary sources: (i) royalty income and franchise fees associated with franchised restaurants; (ii) continuing advertising fees from Dunkin’ and Baskin-Robbins franchisees and breakage and other revenue related to the gift card program; (iii) rental income from restaurant properties that we lease or sublease to franchisees; (iii)(iv) sales of ice cream and other products to franchisees in certain international markets; and (iv)(v) other income including fees for the licensing of the Dunkin’ Donuts brandour brands for products sold in certain retail channels (such as Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods, and retail packaged coffee, and ready-to-drink bottled iced coffee), the licensing of the rights to manufacture Baskin-Robbins ice cream products to a third party for sale to U.S. franchisees, refranchising gains, transfer fees from franchisees, and online training fees. Prior to completing the sale of all company-operated restaurants in fiscal year 2016, we also generated revenue from retail store sales at our company-operated restaurants
Our history
Both of our brands have a rich heritage dating back to the 1940s, when Bill Rosenberg founded his first restaurant, subsequently renamed Dunkin’ Donuts, and Burt Baskin and Irv Robbins each founded a chain of ice cream shops that eventually combined to form Baskin-Robbins. Baskin-Robbins and Dunkin’ Donuts were individually acquired by Allied Domecq PLC in 1973 and 1989, respectively. The brands were organized under the Allied Domecq Quick Service Restaurants subsidiary, which was renamed Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. in 2004. Allied Domecq was acquired in July 2005 by Pernod Ricard S.A. In March of 2006, we wereDunkin’ Brands, Inc. was acquired by investment funds affiliated with Bain Capital Partners, LLC, The Carlyle Group, and Thomas H. Lee Partners, L.P. through a holding company that was incorporated in Delaware on November 22, 2005 and was later renamed Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. In July 2011, we completed our initial public offering (the “IPO”). Upon the completion of the IPO, our common stock became listed on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “DNKN.”

In 2018, the Company unveiled new branding for Dunkin’ Donuts that recognizes the brand as simply “Dunkin’.”
Our brands
Dunkin Donuts-U.S.U.S.
Dunkin’ Donuts is a leading U.S. QSR concept, and is the QSR market leader in donut and bagel categories for servings. Dunkin’ Donuts is also a national QSR leader for breakfast sandwich servings. Since the late 1980s, Dunkin’ Donuts has transformed itself into a coffee and beverage-based concept, and is a national QSR leader in servings in the hot regular/decaf/flavored coffee category and the iced regular/decaf/flavored coffee category, with sales of over 1.7approximately 1.6 billion servings of total hot and iced coffee annually. Over the last ten fiscal years, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales have grown at a 6.1%5.9% compound annual growth rate and total Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. points of distribution grew from 5,3856,583 to 8,828.9,630. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, approximately 86%85% of these points of distribution arewere traditional restaurants consisting of end-cap, in-line and stand-alone restaurants, many with drive-thrus, and gas and convenience locations. In addition, we have alternative points ofspecial distribution opportunities (“APODs”SDOs”), such as full- or self-service kiosks in offices, hospitals, colleges, airports, grocery stores, wholesale clubs, and other smaller-footprint properties. We believe that Dunkin’ Donuts continues to have significant growth potential in the U.S. given its strong brand awareness and variety of restaurant formats. For fiscal year 2016,2019, the Dunkin’ Donuts franchise system generated U.S. systemwide sales of $8.2$9.2 billion, which


- 1-



accounted for approximately 76% of our global systemwide sales, and had 8,8289,630 U.S. points of distribution (with more than 50% of our restaurants having drive-thrus) at period end.


- 1-



Baskin-Robbins-U.S.Baskin-Robbins U.S.
Baskin-Robbins is one of the leading QSR chainschain in the U.S. for servings of hard-serve ice cream, according to CREST® data, and develops and sells a full range of frozen ice cream treats such as cones, cakes, sundaes, and frozen beverages. Baskin-Robbins enjoys 89% aidedstrong brand awareness in the U.S., and we believe the brand is known for its innovative flavors, popular “Birthday Club” program and ice cream flavor library of over 1,300 different offerings. Additionally, our Baskin-Robbins U.S. segment has experienced comparable store sales growth in each of the last six fiscal years. We believe we can capitalize on the brand’s strengths and continue generating renewed excitement for the brand. Baskin-Robbins’ “31 flavors,” offeringflavors” offers consumers a different flavor for each day of the month, is recognized by ice cream consumers nationwide.month. For fiscal year 2016,2019, the Baskin-Robbins franchise system generated U.S. systemwide sales of approximately $603.6$615.3 million, which accounted for approximately 6%5% of our global systemwide sales. Over the last ten fiscal years, total Baskin-Robbins U.S. points of distribution declined from 2,976 to 2,538 as of December 31, 2016.
International operations
Our international business is primarily conducted via joint ventures and country or territorial license arrangements with “master franchisees,” who both operate and sub-franchise the brand within their licensed areas. Increasingly, in certain markets, we are migrating to a model with multiple franchisees in one country, including markets in the United Kingdom, Germany, China, and Mexico. Our international franchise system, predominantly located across Asia and the Middle East, generated systemwide sales of $2.0$2.3 billion for fiscal year 2016,2019, which represented approximately 19% of Dunkin’ Brands’ global systemwide sales. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, Dunkin’ Donuts had 3,4303,507 international points of distribution in 4440 countries (excluding the U.S.), which grew from 1,9082,583 points of distribution as of December 31, 2006,26, 2009, and represented $707.2$834.5 million of international systemwide sales for fiscal year 2016.2019. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, Baskin-Robbins had 5,2845,636 international points of distribution in 51 countries (excluding the U.S.), which grew from 2,917 points of distribution as of December 31, 2006, and represented approximately $1.3$1.5 billion of international systemwide sales for fiscal year 2016.2019. We believe that we have opportunities to continue to grow our Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins concepts internationally in new and existing markets through brand and menu differentiation.

Overview of franchising
Franchising is a business arrangement whereby a service organization, the franchisor, grants an operator, the franchisee, a license to sell the franchisor’s products and services and use its system and trademarks in a given area, with or without exclusivity. In the context of the restaurant industry, a franchisee pays the franchisor for its concept, strategy, marketing, operating system, training, purchasing power, and brand recognition. Franchisees are solely responsible for the day-to-day operations in each franchised restaurant, including but not limited to all labor and employment decisions, such as hiring, promoting, discharging, scheduling, and setting wages, benefits, and all other terms of employment with respect to their employees.
Franchisee relationships
We seek to maximize the alignment of our interests with those of our franchisees. For instance, we do not derive additional income through serving as the supplier to our domestic franchisees. In addition, because the ability to execute our strategy is dependent upon the strength of our relationships with our franchisees, we maintain a multi-tiered advisory council system to foster an active dialogue with franchisees. The advisory council system provides feedback and input on all major brand initiatives and is a source of timely information on evolving consumer preferences, which assists new product introductions and advertising campaigns.
Unlike certain other QSR franchise systems, weWe generally do not guarantee our franchisees’ financing obligations. From time to time, at our discretion, we may offer voluntary financing to existing franchisees for specific programs such as the purchase of specialized equipment. We intend to continue our past practice of limiting our guarantee of financing for franchisees.
Franchise agreement terms
For each franchised restaurant in the U.S., we enter into a franchise agreement covering a standard set of terms and conditions. A prospective franchisee may elect to open either a single-branded distribution point or a multi-branded distribution point. In addition, and depending upon the market, a franchisee may purchase the right to open a franchised restaurant at one or multiple locations (via a store development agreement, or “SDA”). When granting the right to operate a restaurant to a potential franchisee, we will generally evaluate the potential franchisee’s prior food-service experience, history in managing profit and loss operations, financial history, and available capital and financing. We also evaluate potential new franchisees based on financial measures, including liquid asset and net worth minimums for each brand.


- 2-



The typical franchise agreement in the U.S. has a 20-year term. The majority of our franchisees have entered into prime leases with a third-party landlord. The Company is the lessee on certain land leases (the Company leases the land and erects a building) or improved leases (lessor owns the land and building) covering restaurants and other properties. In addition, the


- 2-



Company has leased and subleased land and buildings to other franchisees. When we sublease properties to franchisees, the sublease generally follows the prime lease term. Our leases to franchisees are typically for an overall term of 20 years.
We help domestic franchisees select sites and develop restaurants that conform to the physical specifications of our typical restaurant. Each domestic franchisee is responsible for selecting a site, but must obtain site approval from us based on accessibility, visibility, proximity to other restaurants, and targeted demographic factors including population density and traffic patterns. Additionally, the franchisee must also refurbish and remodel each restaurant periodically (typically every five and ten years, respectively).
We currently require each domestic franchisee’s managing owner and/or designated manager to complete initial and ongoing training programs provided by us, including minimum periods of classroom and on-the-job training. We monitor quality and endeavoroperations in the U.S. with regard to ensure compliance with our standards for restaurant operations through restaurant visits in the U.S. In addition, a restaurant operation review is conducted throughout our domestic operations at least once per year. To complement these procedures, weand use “Guest Satisfaction Surveys” in the U.S. to assess customer satisfaction with restaurant operations, such as product quality, restaurant cleanliness, and customer service.
Store development agreements
WeIn certain domestic markets, we may grant domestic franchisees the right to open one or more restaurants within a specified geographic area pursuant to the terms of SDAs.a store development agreement, or “SDA”. An SDA specifies the number of restaurants and the mix of the brands represented by such restaurants that a franchisee is obligated to open. Each SDA also requires the franchisee to meet certain milestones in the development and opening of the restaurant and, if the franchisee meets those obligations, we agree, during the term of such SDA, not to operate or franchise new restaurants in the designated geographic area covered by such SDA. In addition to an SDA, a franchisee signs a separate franchise agreement for each restaurant developed under such SDA.
Master franchise model and international arrangements
Master franchise arrangements are used on a limited basis domestically (the Baskin-Robbins brand has one “territory” franchise agreement for certain Midwestern markets) but more widely internationally for both the Baskin-Robbins brand and the Dunkin’ Donuts brand. In addition, international arrangements include joint venture agreements in South Korea (both brands), Australia (Baskin-Robbins brand), and Japan (Baskin-Robbins brand), as well as single unit franchises, such as in Canada (both brands)and the United Kingdom (Baskin-Robbins brand). We utilize a multi-franchise system in certain markets, including in the United Kingdom, Germany China, and Mexico. The Company also had an interest in a joint venture in Spain for the Dunkin’ Donuts brand, which it sold during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016.China.
Master franchise agreements are the most prevalent international relationships for both brands. Under these agreements, the applicable brand typically grants the master franchisee the limited exclusive right to develop and operate a certain number of restaurants within a particular geographic area, such as selected cities, one or more provinces or an entire country, pursuant to a development schedule that defines the number of restaurants that the master franchisee must open annually. Those development schedules customarily extend for five to ten years. If the master franchisee fails to perform its obligations, the limited exclusivity provision of the agreement terminatesmay terminate and additional franchise agreements may be put in placegranted to third parties to develop additional restaurants.
The master franchisee is generally required to pay an upfront market developmententry fee and an upfront initial franchise fee for each developed restaurant, and, for the Dunkin’ Donuts brand, royalties. For the Baskin-Robbins brand, the master franchisee is typically required to purchase ice cream from Baskin-Robbins or an approved supplier. In most countries, the master franchisee is also required to spend a certain percentage of gross sales on advertising in such foreign country in order to promote the brand. Generally, the master franchise agreement serves as the franchise agreement for the underlying restaurants operating pursuant to such model. Depending on the individual agreement, we may permit the master franchisee to subfranchise within its territory.
Within each of our master franchisee and joint venture organizations, training facilitiesprograms have been established by the master franchisee or joint venture based on our specifications. From those training facilities, the master franchisee or joint venture trains future staff members of the international restaurants. Our master franchisees and joint venture entities also periodically send their primary training managers to the U.S. for re-certification.





- 3-





Franchise fees
In the U.S., once a franchisee is approved, a restaurant site is approved, and a franchise agreement is signed, the franchisee will begin to develop the restaurant. Franchisees pay us an initial franchise fee for the right to operate a restaurant for one or more franchised brands. The franchisee is required to pay all or part of the initial franchise fee upfront upon execution of the franchise agreement, regardless of when the restaurant is actually opened. Initial franchise fees vary by brand, type of development agreement and geographic area of development, but generally range from $25,000 to $100,000, as shown in the table below.
Restaurant type
Initial franchise
fee*
 Initial franchise fee*
Dunkin’ Donuts Single-Branded Restaurant$ 40,000-90,000
Dunkin’ Single-Branded Restaurant$40,000-90,000
Baskin-Robbins Single-Branded Restaurant$25,000
$25,000
Dunkin’ Donuts/Baskin-Robbins Multi-Branded Restaurant$ 50,000-100,000
Dunkin’/Baskin-Robbins Multi-Branded Restaurant$50,000-100,000
*Fees effective as of January 1, 20172020 and excludes alternative points of distributionSDOs
In addition to the payment of initial franchise fees, our U.S. Dunkin’ Donuts brand franchisees, U.S. Baskin-Robbins brand franchisees, and our international Dunkin’ Donuts brand franchisees pay us royalties on a percentage of the gross sales made from each restaurant. In the U.S., the majority of our franchise agreement renewals and the vast majority of our new franchise agreements require our franchisees to pay us a royalty of 5.9% of gross sales. During fiscal year 2016,2019, our effective royalty rate in the Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. segment was approximately 5.5% and in the Baskin-Robbins U.S. segment was approximately 4.8%. The arrangements for Dunkin’ Donuts in the majority of our international markets require royalty payments to us of 5.0% of gross sales. However, many of our larger international partners,franchisees, including our South Korean joint venture, partner, have agreements at a lower rate and/or based on wholesale sales to restaurants, resulting in an effective royalty rate in the Dunkin’ Donuts internationalInternational segment in 2016fiscal year 2019 of approximately 2.4%2.7%. We typically collect royalty payments on a weekly basis from our domestic franchisees. For the Baskin-Robbins brand in international markets, we do not generally receive royalty payments from our franchisees; instead we earn revenue from such franchisees as a result of our sale of ice cream products to them, and in 2016fiscal year 2019 our effective royalty rate in this segment was approximately 0.5%. In certain instances, we supplement and modify certain SDAs, and franchise agreements entered into pursuant to such SDAs with certain incentives that may (i) reduce or eliminate the initial franchise fee associated with a franchise agreement; (ii) reduce the royalties for a specified period of the term of the franchise agreements depending on the details related to each specific incentive program; (iii) reimburse the franchisee for certain local marketing activities in excess of the minimum required; and (iv) provide certain development incentives. To qualify for any or all of these incentives, the franchisee must meet certain requirements, each of which are set forth in an addendum to the SDA and the franchise agreement. We believe these incentives will lead to accelerated development in our less mature markets.
Franchisees in the U.S. also pay advertising fees to the brand-specific advertising funds administered by us. Franchisees make weekly contributions, generally 5% of gross sales, to the advertising funds. Franchisees may elect to increase the contribution to support general brand-building efforts or specific initiatives. The advertising funds for the U.S., which received $430.3earned $473.6 million in contributions from franchiseesrevenue in fiscal year 2016,2019 primarily from contributions from franchisees, are almost exclusively franchisee-funded and cover substantially all expenses related to marketing, research and development, innovation, advertising and promotion, including market research, production, advertising costs, public relations, and sales promotions. We use no more than 20% of the advertising funds in the U.S. to cover the administrative expenses of the advertising funds and for other strategic initiatives designed to increase sales and to enhance the reputation of the brands. As the administrator of the advertising funds, we determine the content and placement of advertising, which is done through print, radio, television, online, mobile, billboards, sponsorships, and other media, all of which is sourced by agencies. Under certain circumstances, franchisees are permitted to conduct their own local advertising, but must obtain our prior approval of content and promotional plans.

Other franchise related fees
We lease and sublease properties to franchisees in the U.S. and in Canada, generating net rental fees when the cost charged to the franchisee exceeds the cost charged to us. For fiscal year 2016,2019, we generated 12.2%9.0%, or $101.0$122.7 million, of our total revenue from rental fees from franchisees and incurred related occupancy expenses of $57.4$79.2 million.
We also receive a license fee from Dean Foods Co. (“Dean Foods”) as part of an arrangement whereby Dean Foods manufactures and distributes ice cream and other frozen products to Baskin-Robbins franchisees in the U.S. In connection with this agreement, Dunkin’ Brands receives a fee based on net sales of covered products. For fiscal year 2016,2019, we generated 1.3%0.7%, or $10.8$9.8 million, of our total revenue from license fees from Dean Foods.




- 4-





We distribute ice cream products to Baskin-Robbins franchisees who operate Baskin-Robbins restaurants located in certain foreign countries and receive revenue associated with those sales. For fiscal year 2016,2019, we generated 13.9%6.7%, or $114.9$91.4 million, of our total revenue from the sale of ice cream and other products to franchisees primarily in certain foreign countries.countries and incurred related cost of ice cream and other products of $75.8 million.
Other revenue sources include online training fees, licensing fees earned from the sale of K-Cup® pods, retail packaged coffee, ready-to-drink bottled iced coffee, and other branded products, net refranchising gains, and other one-time fees such as transfer fees, and late fees. For fiscal year 2016,2019, we generated 4.9%3.1%, or $40.7$42.7 million, of our total revenue from these other sources.
International operations
Our international business is organized by brand and by country and/or region. Operations are primarily conducted through master franchise agreements with local operators. In certain instances, the master franchisee may have the right to sub-franchise. We utilize a multi-franchise system in certain markets, including the United Kingdom, Germany China and Mexico.China. In addition, we have a joint venture with a local, publicly-traded company for the Baskin-Robbins brand in Japan, and joint ventures with local companies in Australia for the Baskin-Robbins brand and in South Korea for both the Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins brands. The Company also had an interest in a joint venture in Spain for the Dunkin’ Donuts brand, which it sold during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016. By teaming with local operators, we believe we are better able to adapt our concepts to local business practices and consumer preferences. We have had an international presence since 1961 when the first Dunkin’ Donuts restaurant opened in Canada.1961. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there were 5,2845,636 Baskin-Robbins restaurants in 51 countries outside the U.S. and 3,4303,507 Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants in 4440 countries outside the U.S. Baskin-Robbins points of distribution represent the majority of our international presence and accounted for approximately 65%64% of international systemwide sales.
Our key markets for both brands are predominantly based in Asia and the Middle East, which accounted for approximately 70%68% and 17%19%, respectively, of international systemwide sales for fiscal year 2016.2019. For fiscal year 2016, $2.02019, $2.3 billion of total systemwide sales were generated by restaurants located in international markets, which represented approximately 19% of total systemwide sales, with the Dunkin’ Donuts brand accounting for $707.2$834.5 million and the Baskin-Robbins brand accounting for $1.3$1.5 billion of our international systemwide sales. For the same period, our revenues from international operations totaled $141.9$139.1 million, with the Baskin-Robbins brand generating approximately 84%81% of such revenues.
Overview of key markets
As of December 31, 201628, 2019, the top foreign countries and regions in which the Dunkin’ Donuts brand and/or the Baskin-Robbins brand operated were:
Country/Region Type Franchised brand(s) Number of restaurants
South Korea Joint Venture Dunkin’ Donuts 775686

    Baskin-Robbins 1,2881,476

Japan Joint Venture Baskin-Robbins 1,1791,174

Middle East Master Franchise Agreements Dunkin’ Donuts 501650

    Baskin-Robbins 855944

South Korea     
Restaurants in South Korea accounted for approximately 36%38% of total systemwide sales from international operations for fiscal year 2016.2019. Baskin-Robbins accounted for 67%75% of such sales. In South Korea, we conduct business through a 33.3% ownership stake in a combination Dunkin’ Donuts brand/Baskin-Robbins brand joint venture, with South Korean shareholders owning the remaining 66.7% of the joint venture. The joint venture acts as the master franchisee for South Korea, sub-franchising the Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins brands to franchisees. The joint venture also manufactures and supplies restaurants located in South Korea with ice cream, donuts, and coffee products.
Japan
Restaurants in Japan accounted for approximately 21%17% of total systemwide sales from international operations for fiscal year 2016,2019, 100% of which came from Baskin-Robbins. We conduct business in Japan through a 43.3% ownership stake in a Baskin-Robbins brand joint venture. Our partner also owns a 43.3% interest in the joint venture, with the remaining 13.4% owned by public shareholders. The joint venture primarily manufactures and sells ice cream to restaurants in Japan and acts as master franchisee for the country.




- 5-





Middle East
The Middle East represents another key region for us. Restaurants in the Middle East accounted for approximately 17%19% of total systemwide sales from international operations for fiscal year 2016.2019. Baskin-Robbins accounted for approximately 68%57% of such sales. We conduct operations in the Middle East through master franchise arrangements.
Industry overview
According to The NPD Group/CREST® (“CREST®”), the QSR segment of the U.S. restaurantcommercial foodservice industry accounted for approximately $282$332 billion of the total $443$501 billion restaurantcommercial foodservice industry sales in the U.S. for the twelve months ended December 31, 2016.January 5, 2020. The U.S. restaurantcommercial foodservice industry is generally categorized into segments by price point ranges, the types of food and beverages offered, and service available to consumers. QSR is a restaurant format characterized by counter or drive-thru ordering and limited, or no, table service. QSRs generally seek to capitalize on consumer desires for quality and convenient food at economical prices.
Our Dunkin’ Donuts brand competes in the QSR segment categories and subcategories that include coffee, donuts, muffins, bagels, and breakfast sandwiches. For the twelve months ended January 5, 2020, there were sales of nearly 12 billion commercial foodservice servings of coffee in the U.S., 91% of which were attributable to the QSR segment, according to CREST® data. According to CREST®, total coffee servings at QSRs have grown at a 1.4% compound annual growth rate for the five-year period ending January 5, 2020. Over the years, our Dunkin’ brand has evolved into a predominantly coffee-based concept, with approximately 58% of Dunkin’ U.S. systemwide sales for fiscal year 2019 generated from coffee and other beverages. We believe QSRs, including Dunkin’, are positioned to capture additional coffee market share through an increased focus on coffee offerings. In addition, in the U.S., our Dunkin’ Donuts brand has historically focused on the breakfast daypart, which we define to include the portion of each day from 5:00 a.m. until 11:00 a.m. While, according to CREST® data, the compound annual growth rate for total QSR daypart visits in the U.S. was 1% over the five-year period ended December 31, 2016, the compound annual growth rate for QSR visits in the U.S. during the morning meal daypart was 2% over the same five-year period. There can be no assurance that such growth rates will be sustained in the future.
For the twelve months ended December 31, 2016, there were sales of over 8 billion restaurant servings of coffee in the U.S., 86% of which were attributable to the QSR segment, according to CREST® data. According to CREST®, total coffee servings at QSR have grown at a 4% compound annual rate for the five-year period ending December 31, 2016. Over the years, our Dunkin’ Donuts brand has evolved into a predominantly coffee-based concept, with approximately 58% of Dunkin’ Donuts’ U.S. systemwide sales for fiscal year 2016 generated from coffee and other beverages. We believe QSRs, including Dunkin’ Donuts, are positioned to capture additional coffee market share through an increased focus on coffee offerings.
Our Baskin-Robbins brand competes primarily in QSR segment categories and subcategories that include hard-serve ice cream as well as those that include soft serve ice cream, frozen yogurt, shakes, malts, floats, and cakes. While both of our brands compete internationally, approximately 68%69% of Baskin-Robbins restaurants are located outside of the U.S. and represent the majority of our total international sales and points of distribution.
Competition
We compete primarily in the QSR segment of the restaurant industry and face significant competition from a wide variety of restaurants, convenience stores, and other outlets that provide consumers with coffee, baked goods, sandwiches, and ice cream on an international, national, regional, and local level. We believe that we compete based on, among other things, product quality, restaurant concept, service, convenience, value perception, and price. Our competition continues to intensify as competitors increase the breadth and depth of their product offerings, particularly during the breakfast daypart, and open new units. Although new competitors may emerge at any time due to the low barriers to entry, our competitors include: 7-Eleven, Burger King, Cold Stone Creamery, Cumberland Farms, Dairy Queen, McDonald’s, Panera Bread, Quick Trip, Starbucks, Subway, Taco Bell, Tim Hortons, WaWa, and Wendy’s, among others. Additionally, we compete with QSRs, specialty restaurants, and other retail concepts for prime restaurant locations and qualified franchisees.
Licensing
We derive licensing revenue from agreements with Dean Foods for domestic ice cream sales, with The J.M. Smucker Co. (“Smuckers”) for the sale of packaged coffee in certain retail outlets (primarily grocery retail), and with Keurig Green Mountain,Dr Pepper, Inc. (“KGM”KDP”) and Smuckers for sale of Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods in certain retail outlets (primarily grocery retail), and with The Coca-Cola Company for the sale of Dunkin’ branded ready-to-drink bottled iced coffee in certain retail outlets (primarily gas and convenience retail), as well as from other licensees. For the 52 weeks ending December 25, 2016,29, 2019, the Dunkin’ Donuts branded 12 oz. original blend coffee, which is distributed by Smuckers, was the #1 stock-keeping unit nationally in the premium coffee category. For the 52 weeks ending December 25, 2016,29, 2019, sales of our 12 oz. original blend, as expressed in total equivalent units and dollar sales, were double that of the next closest competitor. Additionally, for the 52 weeks ending December 25, 2016,29, 2019, the 10 count10-count carton of our original blend K-Cup® pods, also distributed by Smuckers, was the #1 stock-keeping unit nationally in the K-Cup® pod category. Throughcategory as expressed in total dollar sales. Retail sales of products sold in certain retail channels for the 52 weeks ending December 25, 2016, we have sold29, 2019 were approximately $939.3 million, a 4.1% increase over the prior year. During calendar year 2019, more than 550 million Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods in grocery outlets since launch in May 2015. With the introduction of Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods into grocery outlets, more than 2.43.2 billion cups of Dunkin’ Donuts coffee were sold through grocery outlets during calendar year 2016. In early 2017, the Company launched Dunkin’ Donuts branded ready-to-drink (“RTD”) bottled iced coffee for sale in grocery, convenience stores, and mass merchandisers, as well as inside Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants, across the U.S., through an agreement with The Coca-Cola Company.


- 6-




licensing arrangements.
Marketing
We coordinate domestic advertising and marketing at the national and local levels through our administration of brand specific advertising funds. The goals of our marketing strategy include driving comparable store sales and brand differentiation, increasing our total coffee and beverage sales, protecting and growing our morning daypart sales, and growing our afternoon


- 6-



daypart sales. Generally, our domestic franchisees contribute 5% of weekly gross retail sales to fund brand specific advertising funds. The funds are used for various national and local advertising campaigns including print, radio, television, online, mobile, loyalty, billboards, and sponsorships. Over the past ten years, our U.S. franchisees have invested approximately $2.6$2.9 billion on advertising to increase brand awareness and restaurant performance across both brands. Additionally, we have various pricing strategies, so that our products appeal to a broad range of customers.
Digital and loyalty
In August 2012, we launched the Dunkin’ Donuts mobile application for payment and gifting, which built the foundation for one-to-one marketing with our customers. In January 2014, we launched a new DD Perks® Rewards loyalty program nationally, which is fully integrated with the Dunkin’ Donuts mobile application and allows us to engage our customers in these one-to-one marketing interactions. In June 2016, we continued to leverage digital technologies to drive customer loyalty and enhance the restaurant experience through the launch of On-the-Go mobile ordering for our DD Perks® members, which enables users to order ahead and speed to the front of the line in restaurants. In April 2018, we signed a multi-year agreement with a mobile wallet provider to secure a perpetual license to the software used to build and operate the mobile ordering and payment platform for Dunkin’, providing us greater control over the technology that enables our mobile payments and On-the-Go mobile ordering through the Dunkin’ mobile application. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 our DD Perks® Rewards loyalty program had over 6approximately 13.6 million members.
The supply chain
Domestic
We do not typically supply products to our domestic franchisees. As a result, with the exception of licensing fees paid by Dean Foods on domestic ice cream sales, we do not typically derive revenues from product distribution. Our franchisees’ suppliers include Dean Foods, Rich Products Corp., Dean Foods, The Coca-Cola Company, and KGM.KDP. In addition, our franchisees’ primary coffee roasters currently are New England Tea & Coffee Co.,Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA, Inc., Mother Parkers Tea & Coffee Inc., S&D Coffee, Inc., and Massimo Zanetti Beverage USA,Reily Foods Company, Inc., and their primary donut mix suppliers currently are Continental Mills and Pennant Ingredients Inc. We periodically review our relationships with licensees and approved suppliers and evaluate whether those relationships continue to be on competitive or advantageous terms for us and our franchisees.
Purchasing
Purchasing for the Dunkin�� DonutsDunkin’ brand is facilitated by National DCP, LLC (the “NDCP”), which is a Delaware limited liability company operated as a cooperative owned by its franchisee members. The NDCP is managed by a staff of supply chain professionals who report directly to the NDCP’s board of directors. The NDCP has approximately 1,5001,700 employees including executive leadership, sourcing professionals, warehouse staff, and drivers. The NDCP board of directors has eight voting franchisee members, one NDCP non-voting member, and one independent non-voting member. In addition, our Chief Financial OfficerVice President of Supply Chain is a voting member of the NDCP board. The NDCP engages in purchasing, warehousing, and distribution of food and supplies on behalf of participating restaurants and some international markets. The NDCP program provides franchisee members nationwide the benefits of scale while fostering consistent product quality across the Dunkin’ Donuts brand. We do not control the NDCP and have only limited contractual rights associated with managing that franchisee-owned purchasing and distribution cooperative.
Manufacturing of Dunkin Donuts bakery goods
Centralized production is another element of our supply chain that is designed to support growth for the Dunkin’ Donuts brand. Centralized manufacturing locations (“CMLs”) are franchisee-owned and -operated facilities for the centralized production of donuts and bakery goods. The CMLs deliver freshly baked products to Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants on a daily basis and are designed to provide consistent quality products while simplifying restaurant-level operations. As of December 31, 201628, 2019, there were 10073 CMLs (of varying size and capacity) in the U.S. CMLs are an important part of franchise economics, and are supportive of profit building initiatives as well as protecting brand quality standards and consistency.

Certain of our Dunkin’ Donuts brand restaurants produce donuts and bakery goods on-site rather than sourcing from CMLs. Many of such restaurants, known as full producers, also supply other local Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants that do not have access to CMLs. In addition, in newer markets, Dunkin’ Donuts brand restaurants source donuts and bakery goods that are finished in restaurants. We believe that this “just baked on demand” donut manufacturing platform enables the Dunkin’ Donuts brand to more efficiently expand its restaurant base in newer markets where franchisees may not have access to a CML.


- 7-



Baskin-Robbins ice cream
We outsource the manufacturing and distribution of ice cream products for the domestic Baskin-Robbins brand franchisees to Dean Foods, which strengthens our relationships with franchisees and allows us to focus on our core franchising operations.


- 7-



International
Dunkin Donuts
International Dunkin’ Donuts franchisees are responsible for sourcing their own supplies, subject to compliance with our standards. Most also produce their own donuts following the Dunkin’ Donuts brand’s approved processes. Franchisees in some markets source donuts produced by a brand approved third party supplier. Franchisees are permitted to source coffee from a number of coffee roasters approved by the brand, including the NDCP, as well as certain approved regional and local roasters. In certain countries, our international franchisees source virtually everything locally within their market while in others our international franchisees source most of their supplies from the NDCP. Where supplies are sourced locally, we help identify and approve those suppliers. In addition, we assist our international franchisees in identifying regional and global suppliers with the goal of leveraging the purchasing volume for pricing and product continuity advantages.
Baskin-Robbins
The Baskin-Robbins manufacturing network is comprised of 14ten facilities, none of which are owned or operated by us, that supply our international markets with ice cream products. We utilize facilities owned by Dean Foods to produceproduces ice cream products which we purchase and distribute to many of our international markets. Certain international franchisees rely on third-party-owned facilities to supply ice cream products to them, including facilities in Ireland and Canada. The Baskin-Robbins brand restaurants in India and Russia are supported by master franchisee-owned facilities in those respective countries while the restaurants in Japan and South Korea are supported by the joint venture-owned facilities located within each country.
Research and development
New product innovation is a critical component of our success. We believe the development of successful new products for each brand attracts new customers, increases comparable store sales, and allows franchisees to expand into other dayparts. New product research and development is located in a state-of-the-art facility at our headquarters in Canton, Massachusetts. The facility includes a sensory lab, a quality assurance lab, and a demonstration test kitchen. We rely on our internal culinary team, which uses consumer research, to develop and test new products.

Operational support
Substantially all of our executive management, finance, marketing, legal, technology, human resources, and operations support functions are conducted from our global headquarters in Canton, Massachusetts. In the United States, our franchise operations for both brands are organized into regions, each of which is headed by a regional vice president and directors of operations supported by field personnel who interact directly with the franchisees. Our international businesses are organized by region and have dedicated marketing and restaurant operations support teams that work with our master licensees and joint venture partners to improve restaurant operations and restaurant-level economics. Management of a franchise restaurant is the responsibility of the franchisee, who is trained in our techniques and is responsible for ensuring that the day-to-day operations of the restaurant are in compliance with our operating standards. We have implemented a computer-based disaster recovery program to address the possibility that a natural (or other form of) disaster may impact the information technology systems located at our Canton, Massachusetts headquarters.
Regulatory matters
Domestic
We and our franchisees are subject to various federal, state, and local laws affecting the operation of our respective businesses, including various health, sanitation, fire, and safety standards. In some jurisdictions our restaurants are required by law to display nutritional information about our products. Each restaurant is subject to licensing and regulation by a number of governmental authorities, which include zoning, health, safety, sanitation, building, and fire agencies in the jurisdiction in which the restaurant is located. Franchisee-owned NDCP and CMLs are licensed and subject to similar regulations by federal, state, and local governments.
We and our franchisees are also subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act and various other laws governing such matters as minimum wage requirements, overtime and other working conditions, and citizenship requirements. A significant number of food-service personnel employed by franchisees are paid at rates related to the federal minimum wage.


- 8-



Our franchising activities are subject to the rules and regulations of the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) and various state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises. The FTC’s franchise rule and various state laws require that we furnish a franchise disclosure document (“FDD”) containing certain information to prospective franchisees and a number of states require registration of the FDD with state authorities. We are operating under exemptions from registration in several states based on our experience and aggregate net worth. Substantive state laws that regulate the franchisor-franchisee relationship


- 8-



exist in a substantial number of states, and bills have been introduced in Congress from time to time that would provide for federal regulation of the franchisor-franchisee relationship. The state laws often limit, among other things, the duration and scope of non-competition provisions, the ability of a franchisor to terminate or refuse to renew a franchise and the ability of a franchisor to designate sources of supply. We believe that the FDD for each of our Dunkin’ Donuts brand and our Baskin-Robbins brand, together with any applicable state versions or supplements, and franchising procedures, comply in all material respects with both the FTC franchise rule and all applicable state laws regulating franchising in those states in which we have offered franchises.
International
Internationally, we and our franchisees are subject to national and local laws and regulations that often are similar to those affecting us and our franchisees in the U.S., including laws and regulations concerning franchises, labor, health, sanitation, and safety. International Baskin-Robbins brand and Dunkin’ Donuts brand restaurants are also often subject to tariffs and regulations on imported commodities and equipment, and laws regulating foreign investment. We believe that the international disclosure statements, franchise offering documents, and franchising procedures for our Baskin-Robbins brand and Dunkin’ Donuts brand comply in all material respects with the laws of the applicable countries.

Environmental
Our operations, including the selection and development of the properties we lease and sublease to our franchisees and any construction or improvements we make at those locations, are subject to a variety of federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including environmental, zoning, and land use requirements. Our properties are sometimes located in developed commercial or industrial areas and might previously have been occupied by more environmentally significant operations, such as gasoline stations and dry cleaners. Environmental laws sometimes require owners or operators of contaminated property to remediate that property, regardless of fault. While we have been required to, and are continuing to, clean up contamination at a limited number of our locations, we have no known material environmental liabilities.
Employees
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we employed 1,1631,114 people, 1,1161,074 of whom were based in the U.S. and 4740 of whom were based in other countries. Of our domestic employees, 462410 worked in the field and 654664 worked at our corporate headquarters or our satellite office in California.headquarters. Of thesethe total employees, 213,246, who are almost exclusively in marketing positions, were paid by certain of our advertising funds. None of our employees are represented by a labor union, and we believe our relationships with our employees are healthy.
Our franchisees are independent business owners, so they and their employees are not included in our employee count.
Intellectual property
We own many registered trademarks and service marks (“Marks”) in the U.S. and in other countries throughout the world. We believe that our Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins names and logos, in particular, have significant value and are important to our business. Our policy is to pursue registration of our Marks in the U.S. and selected international jurisdictions, monitor our Marks portfolio both internally and externally through external search agents and vigorously oppose the infringement of any of our Marks. We license the use of our registered Marks to franchisees and third parties through franchise arrangements and licenses. The franchise and license arrangements restrict franchisees’ and licensees’ activities with respect to the use of our Marks, and impose quality control standards in connection with goods and services offered in connection with the Marks and an affirmative obligation on the franchisees to notify us upon learning of potential infringement. In addition, we maintain a limited patent portfolio in the U.S. for bakery and serving-related methods, designs, and articles of manufacture. We generally rely on common law protection for our copyrighted works. Neither the patents nor the copyrighted works are material to the operation of our business. We also license some intellectual property from third parties for use in certain of our products. Such licenses are not individually, or in the aggregate, material to our business.
Seasonality
Our revenues are subject to fluctuations based on seasonality, primarily with respect to Baskin-Robbins. The ice cream industry generally experiences an increase during the spring and summer months, whereas Dunkin’ Donuts hot beverage sales generally increase during the fall and winter months and iced beverage sales generally increase during the spring and summer months.


- 9-



Additional Information
The Company makes available, free of charge, through its internet website www.dunkinbrands.com, its annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, proxy statements, and amendments to those reports filed or


- 9-



furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably practicable after electronically filing such material with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and copy any materialsCommission (“SEC”). Materials filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, NE, Washington, DC 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-SEC-0330. This information is alsoSEC are available at www.sec.gov. The reference to these website addresses does not constitute incorporation by reference of the information contained on the websites and should not be considered part of this document.
Item 1A.Risk Factors.
Risks related to our business and industry
Our financial results are affected by the operating results of our franchisees.
We receive a substantial majority of our revenues in the form of royalties, which are generally based on a percentage of gross sales at franchised restaurants, rent, and other fees from franchisees. Accordingly, our financial results are to a large extent dependent upon the operational and financial success of our franchisees. If sales trends or economic conditions worsen for franchisees, their financial results may deteriorate and our royalty, advertising, rent, and other revenues may decline and our accounts receivable and related allowance for doubtful accounts may increase. In addition, if our franchisees fail to renew their franchise agreements, our royalty revenues may decrease which in turn may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
If we fail to successfully implement our growth strategy, which includes franchisees' opening of new domestic and international restaurants, our ability to increase our revenues and operating profits could be adversely affected.
Our growth strategy relies in part upon new restaurant development by existing and new franchisees, including restaurants in the NextGen design in Dunkin’ U.S. We and our franchisees face many challenges in opening new restaurants, including:
availability of financing;
selection and availability of suitable restaurant locations;
competition for restaurant sites;
availability and cost of labor for new restaurants;
negotiation of acceptable lease and financing terms;
securing required domestic or foreign governmental permits and approvals;
consumer tastes in new geographic regions and acceptance of our products;
employment and training of qualified personnel;
impact of inclement weather, natural disasters, and other acts of nature; and
general economic and business conditions.
In particular, because the majority of our new restaurant development is funded by franchisee investment, our growth strategy is dependent on our franchisees’ (or prospective franchisees’) ability to access funds to finance such development. We generally do not provide our franchisees with direct financing and therefore their ability to access borrowed funds generally depends on their independent relationships with various financial institutions. If our franchisees (or prospective franchisees) are not able to obtain financing at commercially reasonable rates, or at all, they may be unwilling or unable to invest in the development of new restaurants, and our future growth could be adversely affected.
If our franchisees are unable to open new restaurants as we anticipate, our revenue growth, if any, would come primarily from growth in comparable store sales. Our failure to add a significant number of new restaurants or grow comparable store sales would adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues and operating income and could materially and adversely harm our business and operating results. 
Our franchisees could take actions that could harm our business.
Our franchisees are contractually obligated to operate their restaurants in accordance with the operations, safety, and health standards set forth in our agreements with them. However, franchisees are independent third parties whom we do not control. The franchisees own, operate, and oversee the daily operations of their restaurants and have sole control over all employee and


- 10-



other workforce conduct and decisions. As a result, the ultimate success and quality of any franchised restaurant rests with the franchisee. If franchisees do not successfully operate restaurants in a manner consistent with required standards, franchise fees paid to us and royalty and advertising fee income will be adversely affected and brand image and reputation could be harmed, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Although we believe we generally enjoy a positive working relationship with the vast majority of our franchisees, active and/or potential disputes with franchisees could damage our brand reputation and/or our relationships with theour broader franchisee group.

Our success depends substantially on the value of our brands.
Our success is dependent in large part upon our ability to maintain and enhance the value of our brands, our customers’ connection to our brands, and a positive relationship with our franchisees. Brand value can be severely damaged even by isolated incidents, particularly if the incidents receive considerable negative publicity or result in litigation. Some of these incidents may relate to the personal conduct of individuals associated with us, the way we manage our relationship with our franchisees, our growth or rebranding strategies, our development efforts in domestic and foreign markets, or the ordinary course of our, or our franchisees’, business. Other incidents may arise from events that are or may be beyond our ability to control and may damage our brands, such as actions taken (or not taken) by one or more franchisees or their employees relating to customer service, health, safety, welfare, or otherwise; litigation and claims; security breaches or other fraudulent activities associated with our electronic payment systems; and illegal activity targeted at us or others. Additionally, the ongoing relevance of our brands may depend on the success of our sustainability initiatives, which require coordination and alignment with our franchisees. If we are not effective in addressing social and environmental responsibility matters or achieving relevant sustainability goals, consumer trust in our brands may suffer. Consumer demand for our products and our brands’ value could diminish significantly if any such incidents or other matters erode consumer confidence in us or our products, which would likely result in lower sales and, ultimately, lower royalty income, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Incidents involving food-borne illnesses, food tampering, or food contamination involving our brands or our supply chain could create negative publicity and significantly harm our operating resultsresults.
While we and our franchisees dedicate substantial resources to food safety matters to enable customers to enjoy safe, quality food products, widespread food safety events, including instances of food-borne illness (such as salmonella or E. Coli), have occurred in the food industry in the past, and could occur in the future.
Instances or reports, whether true or not, of widespread food-safety issues, such as food-borne illnesses, food tampering, food contamination or mislabeling, either during the growing, manufacturing, packaging, storing, or preparation of products, have in the past severely injured the reputations of companies in the quick-service restaurant sectors and could affect us as well. Any report linking us, our franchisees, or our suppliers to food-borne illnesses or food tampering, contamination, mislabeling, or


- 10-



other food-safety issues could damage the value of our brands immediately and severely hurt sales of our products and possibly lead to product liability claims, litigation (including class actions), or other damages.
In addition, food safety incidents, whether or not involving our brands, could result in negative publicity for the industry or market segments in which we operate. Increased use of social media could create and/or amplify the effects of negative publicity. This negative publicity may reduce demand for our products and could result in a decrease in guest traffic to our restaurants as consumers shift their preferences to our competitors or to other products or food types. A decrease in traffic as a result of these health concerns or negative publicity could materially and adversely affect our brands, our business, and our stock price.operating results.
The quick service restaurant segment is highly competitive, and competition could lower our revenues.
The QSR segment of the restaurant industry is intensely competitive. The beverage and food products sold by our franchisees compete directly against products sold at other QSRs, local and regional beverage and food operations, specialty beverage and food retailers, supermarkets, and wholesale suppliers, many bearing recognized brand names and having significant customer loyalty. In addition to the prevailing baseline level of competition, major market players in noncompeting industries may choose to enter the restaurant industry. Key competitive factors include the number and location of restaurants, product development and menu innovation, quality and speed of service, attractiveness of facilities, effectiveness of advertising, marketing, and operational programs, price, demographic patterns and trends, consumer preferences and spending patterns, menu diversification, health or dietary preferences and perceptions, and new product development.perceptions. Some of our competitors have substantially greater financial and other resources than us, which may provide them with a competitive advantage. In addition, we compete within the restaurant industry and the QSR segment not only for customers but also for qualified franchisees. We cannot guarantee the retention of any, including theour top-performing, franchisees in the future, or that we will maintain the ability to attract, retain, and motivate sufficient numbers of franchisees of the same caliber, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. If we are unable to maintain our competitive position, we could experience lower demand for products,


- 11-



downward pressure on prices, the loss of market share, and the inability to attract, or loss of, qualified franchisees, which could result in lower franchise fees and royalty income, and materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
If we or our franchisees or licensees are unable to protect our customers credit payment card data and other personalregulated, protected or personally identifiable information, we or our franchisees could be exposed to data loss, litigation, and liability, and our reputation could be significantly harmed.
DataCybersecurity and data protection isare increasingly demanding, and the use of electronic payment methods and collection of other personal information exposes us and our franchisees to increased risk of privacy and/or security breaches as well as other risks. In connection with creditpayment card transactions in-store and online, we and our franchisees collect and transmit confidential creditpayment card information by way of retail networks. Additionally, we collect and store personal information from individuals, including our customers, franchisees, and employees.employees, and collect and maintain confidential communications and information important to our business. We rely on commercially available systems, software, tools, and monitoring to provide security for processing, transmitting, and storing such information. The failure of these systems to operate effectively, problems with transitioning to upgraded or replacement systems, or a breach in security of these systems, including through hacking or cyber terrorism, could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Further, the standards for systems currently used for transmission and approval of electronic payment transactions, and the technology utilized in electronic payment themselves, all of which can put electronic payment data at risk, are determined and controlled by the payment card industry, not by us. In addition, our employees, franchisees, contractors, or third parties with whom we do business or to whom we outsource business operations may attempt to circumvent our security measures in order to misappropriate suchregulated, protected, or personally identifiable information, and may purposefully or inadvertently cause a breach involving or compromise of such information. Third parties may have the technology or know-how to breach the security of the personal information collected, stored, or transmitted by us or our franchisees, and our respective security measures, as well as those of our technology vendors, may not effectively prohibit others from obtaining improper access to this information. Advances in computer and software capabilities and encryption technology, new tools, and other developments may increase the risk of such a breach. breach or compromise.
If a person is able to circumvent our data security measures or that of third parties with whom we do business, including our franchisees, he or she could destroy, corrupt, or steal valuable information or disrupt our operations. AnyWe have experienced minor security incidents in the past in the form of credential stuffing attacks in which third parties used breached credentials obtained from unrelated online accounts to attempt to log in to accounts of DD Perks members. The impacts of these attacks have been mitigated and, when appropriate, affected customer passwords have been reset. In September 2019, the New York Attorney General’s Office filed a lawsuit against us stemming from certain of these credential stuffing incidents that occurred in 2015 and 2018, claiming, among other things, a failure to properly notify our customers. At the time of each incident, we immediately conducted a thorough investigation and took appropriate actions based on the findings of each respective investigation. We are vigorously defending this lawsuit. Nevertheless, any security breach could exposeexposes us to risks of data loss, litigation, liability, and could seriously disrupt our operations. Any resulting negative publicity could significantly harm our reputation and could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Sub-franchisees could take actions that could harm our business and that of our master franchisees.
In certain of our international markets, we enter into agreements with master franchisees that permit the master franchisee to develop and operate restaurants in defined geographic areas. As permitted by our master franchisee agreements, certain master franchisees elect to sub-franchise rights to develop and operate restaurants in the geographic area covered by the master franchisee agreement. Our master franchisee agreements contractually obligate our master franchisees to operate their


- 11-



restaurants in accordance with specified operations, safety, and health standards and also require that any sub-franchise agreement contain similar requirements. However, we are not party to the agreements with the sub-franchisees and, as a result, are dependent upon our master franchisees to enforce these standards with respect to sub-franchised restaurants. As a result, the ultimate success and quality of any sub-franchised restaurant rests with the master franchisee.franchisee and the sub-franchisees. If sub-franchisees do not successfully operate their restaurants in a manner consistent with required standards, franchise fees and royalty income paid to the applicable master franchisee and, ultimately, to us could be adversely affected and our brand image and reputation may be harmed, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
We cannot predict the impact that the following may have on our business: (i) new or improved technologies, (ii) alternative methods of delivery, or (iii) changes in consumer behavior facilitated by these technologies and alternative methods of delivery.
Advances in technologies or alternative methods of delivery, including advances in vending machine technology, direct home delivery of on-line orders and home coffee makers, or certain changes in consumer behavior driven by these or other technologies and methods of delivery could have a negative effect on our business. Moreover, technology and consumer


- 12-



offerings continue to develop, and we expect that new or enhanced technologies and consumer offerings will be available in the future. We may pursue certain of those technologies and consumer offerings if we believe they offer a sustainable customer proposition and can be successfully integrated into our business model. However, we cannot predict consumer acceptance of these delivery channels or their impact on our business. In addition, our competitors, some of whom have greater resources than us, may be able to benefit from changes in technologies or consumer acceptance of alternative methods of delivery, which could harm our competitive position. There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully respond to changing consumer preferences, including with respect to new technologies and alternative methods of delivery, or to effectively adjust our product mix, service offerings, and marketing and merchandising initiatives for products and services that address, and anticipate advances in, technology and market trends. If we are not able to successfully respond to these challenges, our business, market share, financial condition, and operating results could be harmed.
Economic conditions adversely affecting consumer discretionary spending may negatively impact our business and operating results.
We believe that our franchisees’ sales, customer traffic, and profitability are strongly correlated to consumer discretionary spending, which is influenced by general economic conditions, unemployment levels, and the availability of discretionary income. Our franchisees’ sales are dependent upon discretionary spending by consumers; any reduction in sales at franchised restaurants will result in lower royalty payments from franchisees to us and adversely impact our profitability. In an economic downturn, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, the pace of new restaurant openings may be slowed, and restaurants may be forced to close, reducing the restaurant base from which we derive royalty income. 
Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition.
We have a significant amount of indebtedness. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we had total indebtedness of approximately $2.5$3.1 billion under our securitized debt facility, excluding $25.9$33.1 million of undrawn letters of credit and $74.1$116.9 million of unused commitments.
Subject to the limits contained in the agreements governing our securitized debt facility, we may be able to incur substantial additional debt from time to time to finance capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, or for other purposes. If we do incur substantial additional debt, the risks related to our high level of debt could intensify. Specifically, our high level of indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, or other general corporate requirements;
requiring a substantial portion of our cash flow to be dedicated to payments to service our indebtedness instead of other purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flow available for capital expenditures, investments, acquisitions, and other general corporate purposes;
increasing our vulnerability to and the potential impact of adverse changes in general economic, industry, and competitive conditions;
limiting our flexibility in planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which we compete;
placing us at a disadvantage compared to other, less leveraged competitors or competitors with comparable debt at more favorable interest rates; and


- 12-



increasing our costs of borrowing. 
In addition, the financial and other covenants we agreed to with our lenders may limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, and engage in other transactions, and the leverage may cause other potential lenders to be less willing to loan funds to us in the future.
We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flow to satisfy our significant debt service obligations, which would adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our ability to make principal and interest payments on and to refinance our indebtedness will depend on our ability to generate cash in the future. This, to a certain extent,future, which is subject to general economic, financial, competitive, legislative, regulatory, and other factors that are beyond our control. If our business does not generate sufficient cash flow from operations, in the amounts projected or at all, or if future borrowings are not available to us under our variable funding notes in amounts sufficient to fund our other liquidity needs, our financial condition and results of operations may be adversely affected. If we cannot generate sufficient cash flow from operations to make scheduled principal amortization and interest payments on our debt obligations in the future, we may need to refinance all or a


- 13-



portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets, delay capital expenditures, or seek additional equity investments. If we are unable to refinance any of our indebtedness on commercially reasonable terms or at all or to effect any other action relating to our indebtedness on satisfactory terms or at all, our business may be harmed.
The terms of our securitized debt financing of certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries have restrictive terms and our failure to comply with any of these terms could put us in default, which would have an adverse effect on our business and prospects.
Unless and until we repay all outstanding borrowings under our securitized debt facility, we will remain subject to the restrictive terms of these borrowings. The securitized debt facility, under which certain of our wholly-owned subsidiaries issued and guaranteed fixed rate notes and variable funding notes, contain a number of covenants, with the most significant financial covenant being a debt service coverage calculation. These covenants limit the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to, among other things:
sell assets;
alter the business we conduct;
engage in mergers, acquisitions, and other business combinations;
declare dividends or redeem or repurchase capital stock;
incur, assume, or permit to exist additional indebtedness or guarantees;
make loans and investments;
incur liens; and
enter into transactions with affiliates.
The securitized debt facility also requires us to maintain specified financial ratios. Our ability to meet these financial ratios can be affected by events beyond our control, and we may not satisfy such a test. A breach of these covenants could result in a rapid amortization event or default under the securitized debt facility. If amounts owed under the securitized debt facility are accelerated because of a default and we are unable to pay such amounts, the investors may have the right to assume control of substantially all of the securitized assets.
If we are unable to refinance or repay amounts under the securitized debt facility prior to the expiration of the applicable term, our cash flow would be directed to the repayment of the securitized debt and, other than management fees sufficient to cover minimal selling, general and administrative expenses, would not be available for operating our business.
No assurance can be given that any refinancing or additional financing will be possible when needed or that we will be able to negotiate acceptable terms. In addition, our access to capital is affected by prevailing conditions in the financial and capital markets and other factors beyond our control. There can be no assurance that market conditions will be favorable at the times that we require new or additional financing.


- 13-



The indenture governing the securitized debt will restrictrestricts the cash flow from the entities subject to the securitization to any of our other entities and upon the occurrence of certain events, cash flow would be further restricted.
In the event that a rapid amortization event occurs under the indenture governing the securitized debt (including, without limitation, upon an event of default under the indenture or the failure to repay the securitized debt at the end of the applicable term), the funds available to us would be reduced or eliminated, which would in turn reduce our ability to operate or grow our business.
Infringement, misappropriation, or dilution of our intellectual property could harm our business.
We regard our Dunkin’ Donuts®, Dunkin’ Donuts®, and Baskin-Robbins® trademarks as having significant value and as being important factors in the marketing of our brands. We have also obtained trademark protection for the trademarks associated with several of our product offerings and advertising slogans, including “America Runs on Dunkin’®”. We believe that these and other intellectual property, including certain patents and trade secrets, are valuable assets that are critical to our success.success and that enable us to continue to capitalize on our name recognition, increase brand awareness, and further develop our products. We rely on a combination of protections provided by contracts, as well as copyright, patent, trademark, and other laws, such as trade secret and unfair competition laws, to protect our intellectual property from infringement, misappropriation, or dilution. We have registered certain trademarks and service marks and have other trademark and service mark registration applications pending in the United States and foreign jurisdictions. However, not all of the trademarks or service marks that we currently use have been registered in all of the countries in which we do business, and they may never be registered in all of those


- 14-



countries.
Although we monitor our intellectual property, especially our trademark portfoliosportfolio, both internally and through external search agents and impose an obligation on franchisees to notify us upon learning of potential infringement of our intellectual property, there can be no assurance that we will be able to adequately maintain, enforce, and protect our trademarks or other intellectual property rights. We are aware of names and marks similar to our service marks being used by other persons. Although we believe such uses will not adversely affect us, furtherThese or currently unknownother unauthorized uses or other infringement of our trademarks or service marks could diminish the value of our brands, create consumer confusion, cause reputational harm, and may adversely affect our business. The same is true with regards to our intellectual property. Namely, that unauthorized uses of such intellectual property, including patents, trade secrets or proprietary software, or other infringement thereof, by third parties may adversely affect our business. Effective intellectual property protection may not be available in every country in which we have or intend to open or franchise a restaurant or license our intellectual property. Failure to adequately protect our intellectual property rights could damage our brands and impair our ability to compete effectively. Even where we have effectively secured statutory protection for our trade secrets and other intellectual property, our competitors may misappropriate our intellectual property and our employees, consultants, and suppliers may breach their contractual obligations not to reveal our confidential information, including trade secrets. Although we have taken measures to protect our intellectual property, there can be no assurance that these protections will be adequate or that third parties will not independently develop products or concepts that are substantially similar to ours. Despite our efforts, it may be possible for third-partiesthird parties to reverse engineer, otherwise obtain, copy, and use software or information that we regard as proprietary. Furthermore, defending or enforcing our trademark rights, branding practices, and other intellectual property, and seeking an injunction and/or compensation for misappropriation of trade secrets or confidential information, could result in the expenditure of significant resources and divert the attention of management, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our brands may be limited or diluted through franchisee and third-party activity.
Although we monitor and restrict franchisee activities through our franchise and license agreements, franchisees or third parties may refer to or make statements about our brands that do not make proper use of our trademarks or required designations, that improperly alter trademarks or branding, or that are critical of our brands or place our brands in a context that may tarnish their reputation. This may result in dilution or tarnishment of our intellectual property. It is not possible for us to obtain registrations for all possible variations of our branding in all territories where we operate. Franchisees, licensees, or third parties may seek to register or obtain registration for domain names and trademarks involving localizations, variations, and versions of certain branding tools, and these activities may limit our ability to obtain or use such rights in such territories. Franchisee noncompliance with the terms and conditions of our franchise or license agreements may reduce the overall goodwill of our brands, whether through the failure to meet health and safety standards, engage in quality control or maintain product consistency, or through the participation in improper or objectionable business practices.
Moreover, unauthorized third parties may useconduct business using our intellectual property to trade ontake advantage of the goodwill of our brands, resulting in consumer confusion or dilution. Any reduction of our brands’ goodwill, consumer confusion, or dilution is likely to impact sales, and could materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.
We are and may become subject to third-party infringement claims or challenges to the validity of our intellectual property.
We are and may, in the future, become the subject of claims for infringement, misappropriation, or other violation of intellectual property rights, which may or may not be unfounded, from owners of intellectual property in areas where our franchisees operate or where we intend to conduct operations, including in foreign jurisdictions. Such claims, whether or not they have any merit, could be time-consuming, cause delays in introducing new menu items, harm our image, our brands, our competitive position, or our ability to expand our operations into other jurisdictions and cause us to incur significant costs related to defense or settlement. If such claims were decided against us, or a third party indemnified by us pursuant to license terms, we


- 14-



could be required to pay damages, develop or adopt non-infringing products or services, or acquire a license to the intellectual property that is the subject of the asserted claim, which license may not be available on acceptable terms or at all. The attendant expenses could require the expenditure of additional capital, and there would be expenses associated with the defense of any infringement, misappropriation, or other third-party claims, and there could be attendant negative publicity, even if ultimately decided in our favor. In addition, third parties may assert that our intellectual property rights are invalid or unenforceable. If our use of intellectual property were found to infringe third-party rights or if portions of our intellectual property were deemed invalid or unenforceable, such loss of rights could permit competing uses of our intellectual property, which could cause a decline in our results of operations and financial condition.
Growth into new territories or new product lines may be hindered or blocked by pre-existing third-party rights.
We act to obtain and protect our intellectual property rights we need to operate successfully with regards to our products and in those territories where we operate. Certain intellectual property rights including rights in trademarks are national in character


- 15-



and limited to the goods and services described in the registrations. This means that they are obtained on a country-by-country, product-by-product basis by the first person to obtain protection through use or registration in that country in connection with specified products and services. As our business grows, we continuously evaluate the potential for expansion into new territories and new products and services. There is a risk with each expansion that growth will be limited or unavailable due to blocking pre-existing third-party intellectual property rights.
The restaurant industry is affected by consumer preferences and perceptions. Changes in these preferences and perceptions may lessen the demand for our products, which could reduce sales by our franchisees and reduce our royalty revenues.
The restaurant industry is affected by changes in consumer tastes, national, regional, and local economic conditions, and demographic trends. For instance, if prevailing health or dietary preferences cause consumers to avoid donuts and other products we offer in favor of foods that are perceived as healthier, our franchisees’ sales would suffer, resulting in lower royalty payments to us, and our business and operating results would be harmed.
If we fail to successfully implement our growth strategy, which includes opening new domestic and international restaurants, our ability to increase our revenues and operating profits could be adversely affected.
Our growth strategy relies in part upon new restaurant development by existing and new franchisees. We and our franchisees face many challenges in opening new restaurants, including:
availability of financing;
selection and availability of suitable restaurant locations;
competition for restaurant sites;
negotiation of acceptable lease and financing terms;
securing required domestic or foreign governmental permits and approvals;
consumer tastes in new geographic regions and acceptance of our products;
employment and training of qualified personnel;
impact of inclement weather, natural disasters, and other acts of nature; and
general economic and business conditions.
In particular, because the majority of our new restaurant development is funded by franchisee investment, our growth strategy is dependent on our franchisees’ (or prospective franchisees’) ability to access funds to finance such development. We do not provide our franchisees with direct financing and therefore their ability to access borrowed funds generally depends on their independent relationships with various financial institutions. If our franchisees (or prospective franchisees) are not able to obtain financing at commercially reasonable rates, or at all, they may be unwilling or unable to invest in the development of new restaurants, and our future growth could be adversely affected.
To the extent our franchisees are unable to open new restaurants as we anticipate, our revenue growth would come primarily from growth in comparable store sales. Our failure to add a significant number of new restaurants or grow comparable store sales would adversely affect our ability to increase our revenues and operating income and could materially and adversely harm our business and operating results. 
Increases in commodity prices may negatively affect payments from our franchisees and licensees.
Coffee and other commodity prices are subject to substantial price fluctuations, stemming from variations in weather patterns, shifting political or economic conditions in coffee-producing countries, potential taxes or fees on certain imported goods, and delays in the supply chain. If commodity prices rise, franchisees may experience reduced sales, due to decreased consumer demand at retail prices that have been raised to offset increased commodity prices, which may reduce franchisee profitability.


- 15-



Any such decline in franchisee sales will reduce our royalty income, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Our joint ventures in Japan and South Korea, as well as our licensees in Russia and India, manufacture ice cream products independently. The joint ventures in Japan and South Korea each own a manufacturing facilityfacilities in its countrytheir countries of operation. The revenues derived from these joint ventures differ fundamentally from those of other types of franchise arrangements in the system because the income that we receive from the joint ventures in Japan and South Korea is based in part on the profitability, rather than the gross sales, of the restaurants operated by these joint ventures. Accordingly, in the event that the joint ventures in Japan or South Korea experience staple ingredient price increases that adversely affect the profitability of the restaurants operated by these joint ventures, that decrease in profitability would reduce distributions by these joint ventures to us, which in turn could materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.

Shortages of coffee or milk could adversely affect our revenues.
If coffee or milk consumption continues to increase worldwide or there is a disruption in the supply of coffee or milk due to natural disasters, political unrest, or other calamities, the global supply of these commodities may fail to meet demand. If coffee or milk demand is not met, franchisees may experience reduced sales which, in turn, would reduce our royalty income. Additionally, if milk demand is not met, we may not be able to purchase and distribute ice cream products to our international franchisees, which would reduce our sales of ice cream and other products. Such reductions in our royalty income and sales of ice cream and other products may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
We and our franchisees rely on information technology and computer systems to process transactions and manage our business, and a disruption or a failure of such systems or technology could harm our reputation and our ability to effectively manage our business.
Network and information technology systems are integral to our business. We utilize various computer systems, including our FAST System and our EFTPay System, which are customized, web-based systems.systems that require the use of third-party software licensed to us. The FAST System is the system by which our U.S. and Canadian franchisees report their weekly sales and pay their corresponding royalty fees and required advertising fund contributions. When sales are reported by a U.S. or Canadian franchisee, a withdrawal for the authorized amount is initiated from the franchisee’s bank after 12 days (from the week ending or month ending date). The FAST System is critical to our ability to accurately track sales and compute royalties due from our U.S. and Canadian franchisees. The EFTPay System is used by our U.S. and Canadian franchisees to make payments against open, non-fee invoices (i.e., all invoices except royalty and advertising funds). When a franchisee selects an invoice and submits the payment, on the following day a withdrawal for the selected amount is initiated from the franchisee’s bank. Additionally, an increasing number of transactions in our restaurants are processed through our mobile application. Despite the implementation of security measures, our systems are subject to damage and/or interruption as a result of power outages, computer and network failures, computer viruses and other disruptive software, security breaches, terrorist attacks, catastrophic events, and improper usage by employees.employees, contractors, or other third parties. Such events could result in a material disruption in operations, a need for a costly repair, upgrade, or replacement of systems, or a decrease in, or in the collection of, royalties paid to us by our franchisees. To the extent that any disruption or security breach were to result in a loss of, or damage to, our data


- 16-



or applications, or inappropriate disclosure of confidential or proprietary information, we could incur reputational harm and a liability which could materially affect our results of operations.

Interruptions in the supply of product to franchisees and licensees could adversely affect our revenues.
In order to maintain quality-control standards and consistency among restaurants, we require through our franchise agreements that our franchisees obtain food and other supplies from preferred suppliers approved in advance. In this regard, we and our franchisees depend on a group of suppliers for ingredients, foodstuffs, beverages, and disposable serving instruments including, but not limited to, Rich Products Corp., Dean Foods Co., The Coca-Cola Company, and Silver Pail Dairy, Ltd. as well as four primary coffee roasters and two primary donut mix suppliers. In 2016,2019, we and our franchisees purchased products from nearly 600340 approved domestic suppliers, with approximately 1314 of such suppliers providing half, based on dollar volume, of all products purchased domestically. We look to approve multiple suppliers for most products, and require any single sourced supplier, such as The Coca-Cola Company, to have contingency plans in place to ensure continuity of supply.place. In addition, we believe that, if necessary, we could promptly obtain readily available alternative sources of supply for each product that we currently source through a single supplier. To facilitate the efficiency of our franchisees’ supply chain, we have historically entered into several preferred-supplier arrangements for particular food or beverage items.
In November 2019, Dean Foods, the exclusive supplier of ice cream to Baskin-Robbins restaurants in the United States, and a supplier of ice cream products to certain international markets, filed a voluntary petition for reorganization pursuant to chapter 11 of the bankruptcy code. Dean Foods has continued to operate as normal during the pendency of the reorganization proceedings and there has been no material impact to the Baskin-Robbins system. Further disruption at Dean Foods could cause an interruption in the supply of product to our franchisees and licensees, which could adversely affect our operations.
The Dunkin’ Donuts system is supported domestically by the franchisee-owned purchasing and distribution cooperative known as the National Distributor Commitment Program.DCP, LLC (the “NDCP”). We have a long-term agreement with the National DCP, LLC (the “NDCP”) for the NDCP to provide substantially all of the goods needed to operate a Dunkin’ Donuts restaurant in the United States. The NDCP also supplies some international markets. The NDCP aggregates the franchisee demand, sends requests for proposals to


- 16-



approved suppliers, and negotiates contracts for approved items. The NDCP also inventories the items in its seven regional distribution centers and ships products to franchisees at least one time per week. We do not control the NDCP and have only limited contractual rights under our agreement with the NDCP associated with supplier certification and quality assurance and protection of our intellectual property. While the NDCP maintains contingency plans with its approved suppliers and has a contingency plan for its own distribution function to restaurants, our franchisees bear risks associated with the timeliness, solvency, reputation, labor relations, freight costs, price of raw materials, and compliance with health and safety standards of each supplier (including those of our international joint ventures) including, but not limited to, risks associated with contamination to food and beverage products. We have little control over such suppliers. Disruptions in these relationships may reduce franchisee sales and, in turn, our royalty income.
Overall difficulty of suppliers (including those of certain international joint ventures) meeting franchisee product demand, interruptions in the supply chain, obstacles or delays in the process of renegotiating or renewing agreements with preferred suppliers, financial difficulties experienced by suppliers, or the deficiency, lack, or poor quality of alternative suppliers could adversely impact franchisee sales which, in turn, would reduce our royalty income and could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

We may not be able to recoup our expenditures on properties we sublease to franchisees.
In some locations, we may pay more rent and other amounts to third-party landlords under a prime lease than we receive from the franchisee who subleases such property. Typically, our franchisees’ rent is based in part on a percentage of gross sales at the restaurant, so a downturn in gross sales would negatively affect the level of the payments we receive. Additionally, pursuant to the terms of certain prime leases we have entered into with third-party landlords, we may be required to construct or improve a property, pay taxes, maintain insurance, and comply with building codes and other applicable laws. The subleases we enter into with franchisees related to such properties typically pass through such obligations, but if a franchisee fails to perform the obligations passed through to them, we will be required to perform those obligations, resulting in an increase in our leasing and operational costs and expenses.
If the international markets in which we compete are affected by changes in political, social, legal, economic, or other factors, our business and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we had 8,7149,143 international restaurants located in 67 foreign countries. The international operations of our franchisees may subject us to additional risks, which differ in each country in which our franchisees operate, and such risks may negatively affect our business or result in a delay in or loss of royalty income to us.
The factors impacting the international markets in which restaurants are located may include:


- 17-



recessionary or expansive trends in international markets;
changes in foreign currency exchange rates and hyperinflation or deflation in the foreign countries in which we or our international joint ventures operate;
the imposition of restrictions on currency conversion or the transfer of funds;
availability of credit for our franchisees, licensees, and our international joint ventures to finance the development of new restaurants;
increases in the taxes paid and other changes in applicable tax laws;
legal and regulatory changes and the burdens and costs of local operators’ compliance with a variety of laws, including trade restrictions, tariffs, and tariffs;data protection requirements;
interruption of the supply of product;
increases in anti-American sentiment and the identification of the Dunkin’ Donuts brand and Baskin-Robbins brand as American brands;
political and economic instability; and
natural disasters, terrorist threats and/or activities, and other calamities.
Any or all of these factors may reduce distributions from our international joint ventures or other international partners and/orand royalty income, which in turn may materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.
Termination of an arrangement with a master franchisee could adversely impact our revenues.
Internationally, and in limited cases domestically, we enter into relationships with “master franchisees” to develop and operate


- 17-



restaurants in defined geographic areas. Master franchisees are granted limited exclusivity rights with respect to larger territories than the typical franchisees, and in particular cases, expansion after minimum requirements are met is subject to the discretion of the master franchisee. In fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 2014,2017, we derived approximately 14.6%8.5%, 14.8%8.7%, and 15.7%8.9%, respectively, of our total revenues from master franchisee arrangements. The termination of an arrangement with a master franchisee or a lack of expansion by certain master franchisees could result in the delay of the development of franchised restaurants, or an interruption in the operation of one of our brands in a particular market or markets. Any such delay or interruption would result in a delay in, or loss of, royalty income to us whether by way of delayed royalty income or delayed revenues from the sale of ice cream and other products by us to franchisees internationally, or reduced sales. Any interruption in operations due to the termination of an arrangement with a master franchisee similarly could result in lower revenues for us, particularly if we were to determine to close restaurants following the termination of an arrangement with a master franchisee.
Fluctuations in exchange rates affect our revenues.
We are subject to inherent risks attributed to operating in a global economy. Most of our revenues, costs, and debts are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, sales made by franchisees outside of the U.S. are denominated in the currency of the country in which the point of distribution is located, and this currency could become less valuable prior to calculation of our royalty payments in U.S. dollars as a result of exchange rate fluctuations. As a result, currency fluctuations could reduce our royalty income. Unfavorable currency fluctuations could result in a reduction in our revenues. Income we earn from our joint ventures is also subject to currency fluctuations. These currency fluctuations affecting our revenues and costs could adversely affect our business and operating results.
Adverse public or medical opinions about the health effects of consuming our products, whether or not accurate, could harm our brands and our business.
Some of our products contain caffeine, dairy products, sugar, other carbohydrates, fats, and other active compounds, the health effects of which are the subject of increasing public scrutiny, including the suggestion that excessive consumption of caffeine, dairy products, sugar, other carbohydrates, fats, and other active compounds can lead to a variety of adverse health effects. There has also been greater public awareness that sedentary lifestyles, combined with excessive consumption of high- carbohydrate, high-fat, or high-calorie foods, have led to a rapidly rising rate of obesity. In the United States and certain other countries, there is increasing consumer awareness of health risks, including obesity, as well as increased consumer litigation based on alleged adverse health impacts of consumption of various food products. While we offer some healthier beverage and food items, including reduced fat items and reduced sugar items, an unfavorable report on the health effects of caffeine or other compounds present in our products, or negative publicity or litigation arising from other health risks such as obesity, could significantly reduce the demand for our beverages and food products. A decrease in customer traffic as a result of these health concerns or negative publicity could materially and adversely affect our brands and our business.


- 18-



We may not be able to enforce payment of fees under certain of our franchise arrangements.
In certain limited instances, a franchisee may be operating a restaurant pursuant to an unwritten franchise arrangement. Such circumstances may arise where a franchisee arrangement has expired and new or renewal agreements have yet to be executed or where the franchisee has developed and opened a restaurant but has failed to memorialize the franchisor-franchisee relationship in an executed agreement as of the opening date of such restaurant.agreement. In certain other limited instances, we may allow a franchisee in good standing to operate domestically pursuant to franchise arrangements whichagreements that have expired in their normal course and have not yet been renewed. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, less than 1% of our restaurants were operating without a written agreement. There is a risk that either category of these franchise arrangements may not be enforceable under federal, state, or local laws and regulations prior to correction or if left uncorrected. In these instances, the franchise arrangements may be enforceable on the basis of custom and assent of performance. If the franchisee, however, were to neglect to remit royalty payments in a timely fashion, we may be unable to enforce the payment of such fees which, in turn, may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. While we generally require franchise arrangements in foreign jurisdictions to be entered into pursuant to written franchise arrangements, subject to certain exceptions, some expired contracts, letters of intent, or oral agreements in existence may not be enforceable under local laws, which could impair our ability to collect royalty income, which in turn may materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.
Our business activities subject us to litigation risk that could affect us adversely by subjecting us to significant money damages and other remedies or by increasing our litigation expense.
In the ordinary course of business, we are the subject of complaints or litigation from franchisees, usually related to alleged breaches of contract or wrongful termination under the franchise arrangements. In addition, we are, from time to time, the subject of complaints or litigation from customers alleging illness, injury, or other food-quality, health, or operational concerns and from suppliers alleging breach of contract. We may also be subject to employee claims based on, among other things,


- 18-



discrimination, harassment, or wrongful termination. Finally, litigation against a franchisee or its affiliates by third parties, whether in the ordinary course of business or otherwise, may include claims against us by virtue of our relationship with the defendant-franchisee. In addition to decreasing the ability of a defendant-franchisee to make royalty payments and diverting management resources, adverse publicity resulting from such allegations may materially and adversely affect us and our brands, regardless of whether such allegations are valid or whether we are liable. Our international operations may be subject to additional risks related to litigation, including difficulties in enforcement of contractual obligations governed by foreign law due to differing interpretations of rights and obligations, compliance with multiple and potentially conflicting laws, new and potentially untested laws and judicial systems, and reduced or diminished protection of intellectual property. A substantial unsatisfied judgment against us or one of our subsidiaries could result in bankruptcy, which wouldcould materially and adversely affect our business and operating results. 
Our business is subject to various laws and regulations and changes in such laws and regulations, and/or failure to comply with existing or future laws and regulations, could adversely affect us.
We are subject to state franchise registration requirements, the rules and regulations of the Federal Trade Commission (the “FTC”), various state laws regulating the offer and sale of franchises in the United States through the provision of franchise disclosure documents containing certain mandatory disclosures, and certain rules and requirements regulating franchising arrangements in foreign countries. Although we believe that the Franchisors’ Franchise Disclosure Documents, togetherFailure to comply with any applicable state-specific versions or supplements, and franchising procedures that we use comply in all material respects with both the FTC guidelines and allor any applicable state laws regulating franchising in those states in which we offer new franchise arrangements, noncompliance could reduce anticipated royalty income, which in turn may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Our franchisees are subject to various existing U.S. federal, state, local, and foreign laws affecting the operation of the restaurants including various health, sanitation, fire, and safety standards. Franchisees may in the future become subject to regulation (or further regulation) seeking to tax or regulate high-fat foods, to limit the serving size of beverages containing sugar, to ban the use of certain packaging materials, (including polystyrene used in the iconic Dunkin’ Donuts cup), or requiring the display of detailed nutrition information. EachCertain of these regulations have already been adopted and further adoption of any of these regulations would be costly to comply with and/orand could result in reduced demand for our products.
Additionally, we are working to manage the risks and costs to us, our franchisees, and our supply chain of the effects of climate change, greenhouse gases, and diminishing energy and water resources. These risks include the increased public focus, including by governmental and nongovernmental organizations, on these and other environmental sustainability matters, such as packaging and waste, animal health and welfare, deforestation, and land use. These risks also include the increased pressure to make commitments, set targets, or establish additional goals and take actions to meet them. These risks could expose us to market, operational, and execution costs or risks. If we are unable to effectively manage the risks associated with our complex regulatory environment, it could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
In connection with the continued operation or remodeling of certain restaurants, franchisees may be required to expend funds to meet U.S. federal, state, and local and foreign regulations. Difficulties in obtaining, or the failure to obtain, required licenses or


- 19-



approvals could delay or prevent the opening of a new restaurant in a particular area or cause an existing restaurant to cease operations. All of these situations would decrease sales of an affected restaurant and reduce royalty payments to us with respect to such restaurant.
The franchisees are also subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, as amended, and various other laws in the United States and in foreign countries governing such matters as minimum-wage requirements, overtime and other working conditions, and citizenship requirements. A significant number of our franchisees’ food-service employees are paid at rates related to the U.S. federal minimum wage and applicable minimum wages in foreign jurisdictions and past increases in the U.S. federal minimum wage and foreign jurisdiction minimum wage have increased labor costs, as would future such increases. Any increases in labor costs might result in franchisees inadequately staffing restaurants. Understaffed restaurants could reduce sales at such restaurants, decrease royalty payments, and adversely affect our brands. Evolving labor and employment laws, rules, and regulations could also result in increased exposure on the part of Dunkin’ Brands’ for labor and employment related liabilities that have historically been borne by franchisees.
In 2015, the National Labor Relations Board adopted a new and broader standard for determining when two or more otherwise unrelated employers may be found to be a joint employer of the same employees under the National Labor Relations Act. If this joint employer liability standard is upheld or adopted by other government agencies such as the Department of Labor, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, and the Occupational Safety and Health Administration or applied generally to franchise relationships, it could cause us to be liable or held responsible for unfair labor practices and other violations of our franchisees and subject us to other liabilities, and require us to conduct collective bargaining negotiations, regarding employees of totally separate, independent employers, most notably our franchisees. In such event, our operating expenses may increase as a result of required modifications to our business practices, increased litigation, governmental investigations or proceedings, administrative enforcement actions, fines and civil liability.
Our and our franchisees’ operations and properties are subject to extensive U.S. federal, state, and local laws and regulations, including those relating to environmental, building, and zoning requirements. Our development of properties for leasing or subleasing to franchisees depends to a significant extent on the selection and acquisition of suitable sites, which are subject to zoning, land use, environmental, traffic, and other regulations and requirements. Failure to comply with legal requirements could result in, among other things, revocation of required licenses, administrative enforcement actions, fines, and civil and criminal liability. We may incur investigation, remediation, or other costs related to releases of hazardous materials or other environmental conditions at our properties, regardless of whether such environmental conditions were created by us or a third party, such as a prior owner or tenant. We have incurred costs to address soil and groundwater contamination at some sites and continue to incur nominal remediation costs at some of our other locations. If such issues become more expensive to address, or if new issues arise, they could increase our expenses, generate negative publicity, or otherwise adversely affect us.
We and our franchisees are or may be subject to U.S. and international privacy, data protection, and information security laws and regulations. Such laws and regulations, including the European Union General Data Protection Regulation and the California Consumer Privacy Act, may require companies to give specific types of notice and in some cases seek consent from consumers before collecting or using their data for certain purposes, including some marketing activities, to provide certain consumers with information about our data collection processes and practices, the information we possess about them, and to permit certain consumers to require that we delete information about them or restrict our use of such information. Various federal, state, and international legislative and regulatory bodies may expand current laws or regulations, enact new laws or regulations, or issue revised rules or guidance regarding privacy, data protection, and information security. In response to such changing laws and regulations, we and our franchisees may need to change or limit the way we use information in operating our businesses, which may result in significant costs, and could compromise our or our franchisees’ marketing or growth strategies, any of which may materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
We are subject to a variety of additional risks associated with our franchisees.
Our franchise system subjects us to a number of additional risks, any one of which may impact our ability to collect royalty payments from our franchisees, may harm the goodwill associated with our brands, and/or may materially and adversely impact


- 19-



our business and results of operations.
Bankruptcy of U.S. Franchisees. A franchisee bankruptcy could have a substantial negative impact on our ability to collect payments due under such franchisee’s franchise arrangements and, to the extent such franchisee is a lessee pursuant to a franchisee lease/sublease with us, payments due under such franchisee lease/sublease. In a franchisee bankruptcy, the bankruptcy trustee may reject its franchise arrangements and/orand franchisee lease/sublease pursuant to Section 365 under the United States bankruptcy code, in which case there would be no further royalty payments and/or franchisee lease/sublease payments from such franchisee, and there can be no assurance as to the proceeds, if any, that may ultimately be recovered in a bankruptcy proceeding of such franchisee in connection with a damage claim resulting from such rejection.


- 20-



Franchisee Changes in Control. The franchise arrangements prohibit “changes in control” of a franchisee without our consent as the franchisor, except in the event of the death or disability of a franchisee (if a natural person) or a principal of a franchisee entity. In such event, the executors and representatives of the franchisee are required to transfer the relevant franchise arrangements to a successor franchisee approved by the franchisor. There can be, however, no assurance that any such successor would be found or, if found, would be able to perform the former franchisee’s obligations under such franchise arrangements or successfully operate the restaurant. If a successor franchisee is not found, or if the successor franchisee that is found is not as successful in operating the restaurant as the then-deceased or disabled franchisee or franchisee principal, the sales of the restaurant and accordingly, the royalty payments from the restaurant could be adversely affected.
Franchisee Insurance. The franchise arrangements require each franchisee to maintain certain insurance types and levels. Certain extraordinary hazards, however, may not be covered, and insurance may not be available (or may be available only at prohibitively expensive rates) with respect to many other risks. Moreover, any loss incurred could exceed policy limits and policy payments made to franchisees may not be made on a timely basis. Any such loss or delay in payment could have a material and adverse effect on a franchisee’s ability to satisfy its obligations under its franchise arrangement, including its ability to make royalty payments.
Some of Our Franchisees are Operating Entities. Franchisees may be natural persons or legal entities. Our franchisees that are operating companies (as opposed to limited purpose entities) are subject to business, credit, financial, and other risks, which may be unrelated to the operations of the restaurants. These unrelated risks could materially and adversely affect a franchisee that is an operating company and its ability to make its royalty payments in full or on a timely basis, which in turn could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Franchise Arrangement Termination; Nonrenewal. Each franchise arrangement is subject to termination by us as the franchisor in the event of a default, generally after expiration of applicable cure periods, although under certain circumstances a franchise arrangement may be terminated by us upon notice without an opportunity to cure. The default provisions under the franchise arrangements are drafted broadly and include, among other things, any failure to meet operating standards and actions that may threaten our licensed intellectual property.
In addition, each franchise agreement has an expiration date. Upon the expiration of the franchise arrangement,agreement, we or the franchisee (if the franchisee has contractual renewal rights) may, or may not, elect to renew the franchise arrangements.agreement. If the franchisee arrangementagreement is renewed, the franchisee will receive a “successor” franchise arrangementagreement for an additional term. Such option, however, is contingent on the franchisee’s execution of the then-current form of franchise arrangementsagreement (which may include increased royalty payments, advertising fees, and other costs), the satisfaction of certain conditions (including modernization of the restaurant and related operations), and the payment of a renewal fee. If we terminate a franchise agreement or a franchisee is unable or unwilling to satisfy any of the foregoing renewal conditions the expiring franchise arrangements will terminate upon expiration of the term ofand, as a result, the franchise arrangements.agreement expires, our royalty payments could be adversely effected.
Product Liability Exposure. We require franchisees to maintain general liability insurance coverage to protect against the risk of product liability and other risks and demand strict franchisee compliance with health and safety regulations. However, franchisees may receive through the supply chain (from central manufacturing locations (“CMLs”), NDCP, or otherwise), or produce defective food or beverage products, whichand insurance may not be sufficient to cover their exposure. Regardless, such exposures may adversely impact our brands’ goodwill.
Americans with Disabilities Act. Restaurants located in the United States must comply with Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, as amended (the “ADA”). Although we believe newer restaurants meet the ADA construction standards and, further, that franchisees have historically been diligent in the remodeling of older restaurants, a finding of noncompliance with the ADA could result in the imposition of injunctive relief, fines, an award of damages to private litigants, or additional capital expenditures to remedy such noncompliance. Any imposition of injunctive relief, fines, damage awards, or capital expenditures could adversely affect the ability of a franchisee to make royalty payments, or could generate negative publicity, or otherwise adversely affect us.
Franchisee Litigation. Franchisees are subject to a variety of litigation risks, including, but not limited to, customer claims, personal-injury claims, environmental claims, employee allegations of improper termination and discrimination, claims related to violations of the ADA, religious freedom, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended (“ERISA”), or data protection laws, and intellectual-property claims. Each of these claims may increase costs and limit the funds


- 20-



available to make royalty payments and reduce the execution of new franchise arrangements.
Potential Conflicts with Franchisee Organizations. Although we believe our relationship with our franchisees is open and strong, the nature of the franchisor-franchisee relationship can give rise to conflict. In the U.S., our approach is collaborative in that we have established district advisory councils, regional advisory councils, and a national brand advisory council for each of the Dunkin’ Donuts brand and the Baskin-Robbins brand. The councils are comprised of franchisees, brand employees, and executives, and they meet to discuss the strengths, weaknesses, challenges, and opportunities facing the brands as well as the


- 21-



rollout of new products and projects. Internationally, our operations are primarily conducted through joint ventures with local licensees, so our relationships are conducted directly with our licensees rather than separate advisory committees. NoIf material disputes with franchisee organizations existwere to develop in the United States or internationally, at this time.it could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.
Failure to retain our existing senior management team or the inability to attract and retain new qualified personnel could hurt our business and inhibit our ability to operate and grow successfully.
Our success will continue to depend to a significant extent on our executive management team and the ability of other key management personnel to replace executives who retire or resign.departing executives. We may not be able to retain our executive officers and key personnel or attract additional qualified management personnel to replace executives who retire or resign.departing executives. Failure to retain our leadership team and attract and retain other important personnel could lead to ineffective management and operations, which could materially and adversely affect our business and operating results.

Unforeseen weather or other events, including terrorist threats or activities, may disrupt our business.
Unforeseen events, including war, terrorism, and other international, regional, or local instability or conflicts (including labor issues), embargos, public health issues (including tainted food, food-borne illnesses, food tampering, tampering with or failure of water supply or widespread/pandemic illness such as Ebola,coronavirus, ebola, the avian or H1N1 flu, MERS), and natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, hurricanes, or other adverse weather and climate conditions, whether occurring in the U.S. or abroad, could disrupt our operations or that of our franchisees or suppliers; or result in political or economic instability. These events could reduce traffic in our restaurants and demand for our products; make it difficult or impossible for our franchisees to receive products from their suppliers; disrupt or prevent our ability to perform functions at the corporate level; and/orand otherwise impede our or our franchisees’ ability to continue business operations in a continuous manner consistent with the level and extent of business activities prior to the occurrence of the unexpected event or events, which in turn may materially and adversely impact our business and operating results.

Risks related to our common stock

Our stock price could be extremely volatile and, as a result, you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the price you paid for them.
Since our initial public offering in July 2011, the closing price of our common stock, as reported by NASDAQ, has ranged from a low of $23.24 on December 15, 2011 to a high of $56.79$83.80 on July 14, 2015. In addition, the stock market in general has been highly volatile. As a result, theSeptember 4, 2019. The market price of our common stock is likely to continue to be similarly volatile, and investors in our common stock may experience a decrease, which could be substantial, in the value of their stock, including decreases unrelated to our operating performance or prospects, and could lose part or all of their investment. The price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a number of factors, including those described elsewhere in this report and others such as:
variations in our operating performance and the performance of our competitors;
actual or anticipated fluctuations in our quarterly or annual operating results;
publication of research reports by securities analysts about us, our competitors, or our industry;
negative social media stories about our franchisees' restaurants;
our failure or the failure of our competitors to meet analysts’ projections or guidance that we or our competitors may give to the market;
additions and departures of key personnel;
strategic decisions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions, divestitures, spin-offs, joint ventures, strategic investments, or changes in business strategy;
the passage of legislation or other regulatory developments affecting us or our industry;
speculation in the press or investment community;


- 21-



changes in accounting principles;
terrorist acts, acts of war, or periods of widespread civil unrest;
natural disasters and other calamities; and
changes in general market and economic conditions.


- 22-



As we operate in a single industry, we are especially vulnerable to these factors to the extent that they affect our industry, our products, or to a lesser extent our markets. In the past, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against companies following periods of volatility in their stock price. This type of litigation could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s attention and resources, and could also require us to make substantial payments to satisfy judgments or to settle litigation.
Provisions in our charter documents and Delaware law may deter takeover efforts that you feel would be beneficial to stockholder value.
Our certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions which could make it harder for a third party to acquire us, even if doing so might be beneficial to our stockholders. These provisions include a classified board of directors and limitations on actions by our stockholders. In addition, our board of directors has the right to issue preferred stock without stockholder approval that could be used to dilute a potential hostile acquirer. Our certificate of incorporation also imposes some restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and a holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock. As a result, you may lose your ability to sell your stock for a price in excess of the prevailing market price due to these protective measures, and efforts by stockholders to change the direction or management of the company may be unsuccessful.
Item 1B.Unresolved Staff Comments.
None.


- 23-



Item 2.Properties.
Our corporate headquarters, located in Canton, Massachusetts, houseshouse substantially all of our executive management and employees who provide our primary corporate support functions: legal, marketing, technology, human resources, public relations, finance, and research and development.
As of December 31, 201628, 2019, we owned 96103 properties and leased 963943 locations across the U.S. and Canada, a majoritysubstantially all of which we leased or subleased to franchisees. For fiscal year 2016,2019, we generated 12.2%9.0%, or $101.0$122.7 million, of our total revenue from rental fees from franchisees who lease or sublease their properties from us.
The remaining balance of restaurants selling our products are situated on real property owned by franchisees or leased directly by franchisees from third-party landlords. All international restaurants (other than 1113 located in Canada) are situated on real property owned by licensees and their sub-franchisees or leased by licensees and their sub-franchisees directly from a third-party landlord.


- 22-



As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, 100% of Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins restaurants arewere owned and operated by franchisees. We have construction and site management personnel who oversee the construction of restaurants by outside contractors. The restaurants are built to our specifications as to exterior style and interior decor. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there were 12,25813,137 Dunkin’ Donuts points of distribution, operating in 4143 states and the District of Columbia in the U.S. and 4440 foreign countries. Baskin-Robbins points of distribution totaled 7,822,8,160, operating in 4344 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and 51 foreign countries. As of December 31, 2016, the Company did not own or operate any restaurants. The following table illustrates domestic and international points of distribution by brand as of December 31, 201628, 2019.
 Franchised points of distribution
Dunkin’ Donuts—US*8,8289,630

Dunkin’ Donuts—International3,4303,507

Total Dunkin’ Donuts**12,25813,137

Baskin-Robbins—US*2,5382,524

Baskin-Robbins—International5,2845,636

Total Baskin-Robbins*7,8228,160

Total US11,36612,154

Total International8,7149,143

*Combination restaurants, as more fully described below, count asare considered both a Dunkin’ Donuts and a Baskin-Robbins point of distribution.
Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins restaurants operate in a variety of formats. Dunkin’ Donuts traditional restaurant formats include free standing restaurants, end-caps (i.e., end location of a larger multi-store building), and gas and convenience locations. A free-standing building typically ranges in size from 1,200 to 2,500 square feet, and may include a drive-thru window. An end-cap typically ranges in size from 1,000 to 2,000 square feet and may include a drive-thru window. Dunkin’ Donuts also has other restaurants designed to fit anywhere, consisting of small full-service restaurants and/or self-serve kiosks in offices, hospitals, colleges, airports, grocery stores, wholesale clubs, and drive-thru-only units on smaller pieces of property (collectively referred to as alternative points of distributionsspecial distribution opportunities or “APODs”“SDOs”). APODsSDOs typically range in size between 400 to 1,800 square feet. The majority of our Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants have their fresh baked goods delivered to them from franchisee-owned and -operated CMLs.
Baskin-Robbins traditional restaurant formats include free standing restaurants and end-caps. A free-standing building typically ranges in size from 600 to 1,200 square feet, and may include a drive-thru window. An end-cap typically ranges in size from 800 to 1,200 square feet and may include a drive-thru window. We also have other restaurants, consisting of small full-service restaurants and/or self-serve kiosks (collectively referred to as APODs)SDOs). APODsSDOs typically range in size between 400 to 1,000 square feet.
In the U.S., Baskin-Robbins can also be found in 1,2651,348 combination restaurants (“combos”) that also include a Dunkin’ Donuts restaurant, and are typically either free-standing or an end-cap. These combos, which we count asconsider both a Dunkin’ Donuts and a Baskin-Robbins point of distribution, typically range from 1,400 to 3,500 square feet.
Of the 11,36612,154 U.S. locations, 9299 were sites owned by the Company and leased to franchisees, 932908 were leased by us, and in turn, subleased to franchisees, with the remainder either owned or leased directly by the franchisee. Our land or land and building leases are generally for terms of ten years to twenty years, and often have one or more five-year or ten-year renewal


- 24-



options. In certain lease agreements, we have the option to purchase, or the right of first refusal to purchase, the real estate. Certain leases require the payment of additional rent equal to a percentage of annual sales in excess of specified amounts.
Of the sites owned or leased by the Company in the U.S., 1521 are locations that no longer have a Dunkin’ Donuts or Baskin-Robbins restaurant (“surplus properties”). Some of these surplus properties have been sublet to other parties while the remaining are currently vacant.
We also have leased office space in Brazil, China, Dubai,the United Arab Emirates, and the United Kingdom.


- 23-



The following table sets forth the Company’s owned and leased office and training facilities, including the approximate square footage of each facility. None of these owned properties, or the Company’s leasehold interest in leased property, is encumbered by a mortgage.
LocationType Owned/Leased Approximate Sq. Ft.
Canton, MAOffice Leased 175,000

Braintree, MA (training facility)Office Owned 15,000
Burbank, CA (training facility)OfficeLeased19,000

Dubai, United Arab Emirates (regional office space)Office Leased 3,200

Shanghai, China (regional office spaces)Office Leased 2,9002,975

Various (regional sales offices)Office Leased Range of 150 to 300

Item 3.Legal Proceedings.
We are engaged in several matters of litigation arising in the ordinary course of our business as a franchisor. Such matters include disputes related to compliance with the terms of franchise and development agreements, including claims or threats of claims of breach of contract, negligence, and other alleged violations by us. As of December 31, 2016, $5.6 million is recorded within other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet in connection with all outstanding litigation.
Item 4.Mine Safety DisclosuresDisclosures.
Not applicable.


- 25-



PART II
Item 5.Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.
Our common stock has been listed on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “DNKN” since July 27, 2011. Prior to that time, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the high and low sale prices of our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market.
Fiscal QuarterHigh Low
2016   
Fourth Quarter (14 weeks ended December 31, 2016)$56.13
 $46.55
Third Quarter (13 weeks ended September 24, 2016)$50.34
 $41.29
Second Quarter (13 weeks ended June 25, 2016)$49.59
 $42.00
First Quarter (13 weeks ended March 26, 2016)$48.29
 $36.44
    
2015   
Fourth Quarter (13 weeks ended December 26, 2015)$50.17
 $39.29
Third Quarter (13 weeks ended September 26, 2015)$56.79
 $46.50
Second Quarter (13 weeks ended June 27, 2015)$55.60
 $46.89
First Quarter (13 weeks ended March 28, 2015)$48.69
 $41.72
On February 20, 2017,2020, we had 9741,068 holders of record of our common stock.


- 24-



Dividend policy
During fiscal years 2016 and 2015, the Company paid dividends on common stock as follows:
 Dividend per share Total amount (in thousands) Payment date
Fiscal year 2016:     
First quarter$0.3000
 $27,395
 March 16, 2016
Second quarter$0.3000
 $27,456
 June 8, 2016
Third quarter$0.3000
 $27,475
 August 31, 2016
Fourth quarter$0.3000
 $27,377
 November 30, 2016
      
Fiscal year 2015:     
First quarter$0.2650
 $25,688
 March 18, 2015
Second quarter$0.2650
 $25,127
 June 17, 2015
Third quarter$0.2650
 $25,197
 September 2, 2015
Fourth quarter$0.2650
 $24,504
 December 2, 2015

On February 9, 2017, we announced that our board of directors approved an increase to the next quarterly dividend to $0.3225 per share of common stock payable on March 22, 2017.

We currently anticipate continuing the payment of quarterly cash dividends. The actual amount of such dividends will depend upon future earnings, results of operations, capital requirements, our financial condition, and certain other factors. There can be no assurance as to the amount of free cash flow that we will generate in future years and, accordingly, dividends will be considered after reviewing returns to shareholders, profitability expectations, and financing needs and will be declared at the discretion of our board of directors.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table contains information regarding purchases of our common stock made during the quarter ended December 31, 201628, 2019 by or on behalf of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. or any “affiliated purchaser,” as defined by Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934:
  Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
09/25/16 - 10/22/16 
 $
 
 $170,000,000
10/23/16 - 11/26/16 520,631
 48.01
 520,631
 145,002,654
11/27/16 - 12/31/16 
 
 
 145,002,654
Total 520,631
 $48.01
 520,631
  
  Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Period Total Number of Shares Purchased Average Price Paid Per Share Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs 
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs(1)
09/29/19 - 10/26/19 
 $
 
 $195,195,400
10/27/19 - 11/30/19 65,212
 75.33
 65,212
��190,283,000
12/01/19 - 12/28/19 
 
 
 190,283,000
Total 65,212
 $75.33
 65,212
  
On February 4, 2016, our board of directors increased the availability under the existing share repurchase program, which was approved by our board of directors on January 26, 2015, to $200.0 million of outstanding shares of our common stock. This repurchase authorization expires two years from the date of such increase.
(1)On February 5, 2020, our board of directors authorized a new share repurchase program for up to an aggregate of $250.0 million of our outstanding common stock. This repurchase authorization is valid for a period of two years. Under the program, purchases may be made in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions from time to time subject to market conditions. The new share repurchase program replaces the existing program adopted in May 2018.








- 25-



Securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans
 (a) (b) (c)
Plan Category
Number of securities to
be issued upon exercise
of outstanding options,
warrants, and rights(1)(4)
 
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options,
warrants and rights(2)
 
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))(3)(4)
Equity compensation plans approved by security holders6,227,376
 $35.75
 5,166,611
Equity compensation plans not approved by security holders
 
 
TOTAL6,227,376
 $35.75
 5,166,611
(1)Consists of 5,896,826 shares issuable upon exercise of outstanding options, 217,509 shares issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units, and 113,041 shares issuable upon vesting of performance stock units under approved plans.

(2)The weighted-average exercise price takes into account 330,550 shares under approved plans issuable upon vesting of outstanding restricted stock units and performance stock units, which have no exercise price. The weighted average exercise price solely with respect to stock options outstanding under the approved plans is $37.75.
(3)Consists of 4,694,292 shares remaining available for issuance under the Company’s 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan and 472,319 shares remaining available for issuance under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan.
(4)Amounts exclude the impact of a maximum 113,041 of incremental shares that may be issuable upon vesting based on the level of performance achieved related to performance stock units.




- 26-





Performance Graph
The following graph depicts the total return to shareholders for the five-year period ended December 31, 2016,28, 2019, relative to the performance of the Standard & Poor’s 500 Index and the Standard & Poor’s 500 Consumer Discretionary Sector, a peer group. The graph assumes an investment of $100 in our common stock and each index on December 31, 201127, 2014 and the reinvestment of dividends paid since that date. The stock price performance shown in the graph is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.


chart-c691ff406c7e50afb81.jpg


12/31/201112/29/201212/28/201312/27/201412/26/201512/31/201612/27/201412/26/201512/31/201612/30/201712/29/201812/28/2019
Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. (DNKN)$100.00
$131.49
$197.64
$178.79
$182.76
$231.90
$100.00
$102.22
$129.70
$163.12
$163.75
$195.90
S&P 500$100.00
$111.06
$145.82
$165.41
$163.21
$177.29
$100.00
$98.88
$107.41
$128.27
$119.26
$155.45
S&P Consumer Discretionary$100.00
$118.87
$169.60
$184.78
$201.00
$208.87
$100.00
$108.77
$113.04
$137.03
$134.89
$173.08




- 27-





Item 6.Selected Financial Data.
The following table sets forth our selected historical consolidated financial and other data, and should be read in conjunction with “Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations” and the consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected historical financial data has been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for future periods. The data in the following table related to adjusted operating income, adjusted net income, points of distribution, comparable store sales growth, systemwide sales, and systemwide sales growth are unaudited for all periods presented. The data for fiscal year 2016 reflects the results of operations for a 53-week period. All other periods presented reflect the results of operations for 52-week periods. As a result of the adoption of guidance related to revenue recognition during fiscal year 2018, prior period information for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 included below has been restated to reflect the new guidance. Prior period information for fiscal year 2015 has not been restated and is, therefore, not comparable to the fiscal year 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 information. The Company adopted new guidance for lease accounting in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019 on a modified retrospective transition method and elected the option to not restate comparative periods. See note 2(v) of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K for further disclosure of the impact of the new guidance.
Fiscal YearFiscal year
2016 2015 2014 2013 20122019 
2018(1)
 
2017(1)
 
2016(1)
 
2015(1)
($ in thousands, except per share data)($ in thousands, except per share data)
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:                  
Franchise fees and royalty income$549,571
 513,222
 482,329
 453,976
 418,940
$604,431
 578,342
 555,206
 536,396
 513,222
Advertising fees and related income499,303
 493,590
 470,984
 453,553
 
Rental income101,020
 100,422
 97,663
 96,082
 96,816
122,671
 104,413
 104,643
 101,020
 100,422
Sales of ice cream and other products114,857
 115,252
 117,484
 112,276
 94,659
91,362
 95,197
 96,388
 100,542
 115,252
Sales at company-operated restaurants11,975
 28,340
 22,206
 24,976
 22,922

 
 
 11,975
 28,340
Other revenues51,466
 53,697
 29,027
 26,530
 24,844
52,460
 50,075
 48,330
 44,869
 53,697
Total revenues828,889
 810,933
 748,709
 713,840
 658,181
1,370,227
 1,321,617
 1,275,551
 1,248,355
 810,933
Amortization of intangible assets22,079
 24,688
 25,760
 26,943
 26,943
18,454
 21,113
 21,335
 22,079
 24,688
Other operating costs and expenses(1)
416,029
 426,363
 406,775
 409,688
 416,469
Other operating costs and expenses919,428
 901,905
 878,999
 869,607
 426,363
Total operating costs and expenses438,108
 451,051
 432,535
 436,631
 443,412
937,882
 923,018
 900,334
 891,686
 451,051
Net income (loss) of equity method investments(2)
14,552
 (41,745) 14,846
 18,370
 22,351
17,517
 14,903
 15,198
 14,552
 (41,745)
Other operating income, net9,381
 1,430
 7,838
 9,157
 2,309
Other operating income (loss), net1,188
 (1,670) 627
 9,381
 1,430
Operating income414,714
 319,567
 338,858
 304,736
 239,429
451,050
 411,832
 391,042
 380,602
 319,567
Interest expense, net(100,270) (96,341) (67,824) (79,831) (73,488)(118,477) (121,548) (101,110) (100,270) (96,341)
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions
 (20,554) (13,735) (5,018) (3,963)(13,076) 
 (6,996) 
 (20,554)
Other gains (losses), net(1,195) (1,084) (1,566) (1,799) 23
Other income (loss), net(235) (1,083) 391
 (1,195) (1,084)
Income before income taxes313,249
 201,588
 255,733
 218,088
 162,001
319,262
 289,201
 283,327
 279,137
 201,588
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands$195,576
 105,227
 176,357
 146,903
 108,308
$242,024
 229,906
 271,209
 175,289
 105,227
Earnings per share:                  
Common—basic$2.14
 1.10
 1.67
 1.38
 0.94
$2.92
 2.75
 2.99
 1.91
 1.10
Common—diluted2.11
 1.08
 1.65
 1.36
 0.93
2.89
 2.71
 2.94
 1.89
 1.08






- 28-





Fiscal YearFiscal year
2016 2015 2014 2013 20122019 
2018(1)
 
2017(1)
 
2016(1)
 
2015(1)
($ in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise noted)($ in thousands, except per share data or as otherwise noted)
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:                  
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$431,831
 333,115
 208,358
 257,238
 252,985
$707,977
 598,321
 1,114,099
 431,832
 333,115
Total assets3,227,382
 3,197,119
 3,124,400
 3,172,653
 3,153,568
3,920,024
 3,456,581
 3,937,433
 3,227,419
 3,197,119
Total debt(3)
2,435,137
 2,453,643
 1,807,556
 1,811,798
 1,832,581
3,043,105
 3,049,750
 3,075,133
 2,435,137
 2,453,643
Total liabilities3,390,640
 3,417,862
 2,749,450
 2,760,365
 2,803,593
4,508,034
 4,169,378
 4,191,972
 3,574,007
 3,417,862
Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)(163,258) (220,743) 367,959
 407,358
 349,975
Total stockholders’ deficit(588,010) (712,797) (254,539) (346,588) (220,743)
Other Financial Data:                  
Capital expenditures$15,174
 30,246
 23,638
 31,099
 22,398
$36,762
 51,855
 21,055
 20,826
 30,246
Adjusted operating income(4)
436,578
 400,477
 365,956
 340,396
 307,157
470,055
 434,593
 411,096
 402,466
 400,477
Adjusted net income(4)
208,694
 187,893
 186,113
 165,761
 149,700
265,122
 246,294
 190,636
 188,407
 187,893
Points of Distribution(5):
                  
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.8,828
 8,431
 8,082
 7,695
 7,324
Dunkin’ Donuts International3,430
 3,319
 3,228
 3,163
 3,025
Dunkin’ U.S.9,630
 9,419
 9,141
 8,828
 8,431
Dunkin’ International3,507
 3,452
 3,397
 3,430
 3,319
Baskin-Robbins U.S.2,538
 2,529
 2,529
 2,512
 2,507
2,524
 2,550
 2,560
 2,538
 2,529
Baskin-Robbins International5,284
 5,078
 5,023
 4,788
 4,512
5,636
 5,491
 5,422
 5,284
 5,078
Total points of distribution20,080
 19,357
 18,862
 18,158
 17,368
21,297
 20,912
 20,520
 20,080
 19,357
Comparable Store Sales Growth (Decline):                  
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.(6)
1.6 % 1.4 % 1.7 % 3.3 % 4.1%
Dunkin’ Donuts International(7)
(1.9)% 0.5 % (2.0)% (0.4)% 2.0%
Dunkin’ U.S.(6)
2.1% 0.6 % 0.6 % 1.6 % 1.4 %
Dunkin’ International(7)
5.7% 2.2 % 0.3 % (1.9)% 0.5 %
Baskin-Robbins U.S.(6)
0.7 % 6.1 % 4.9 % 1.0 % 4.0%0.8% (0.6)% 0.0 % 0.7 % 6.1 %
Baskin-Robbins International(7)
(4.2)% (1.9)% (1.2)% 1.9 % 2.8%1.9% 3.8 % (0.1)% (4.2)% (1.9)%
Systemwide Sales ($ in millions)(8):
                  
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.$8,226.1
 7,622.9
 7,179.1
 6,747.1
 6,270.2
Dunkin’ Donuts International707.2
 678.4
 698.2
 678.5
 657.6
Dunkin’ U.S.$9,228.5
 8,786.8
 8,458.7
 8,226.1
 7,622.9
Dunkin’ International834.5
 775.5
 733.6
 707.2
 678.4
Baskin-Robbins U.S.603.6
 594.8
 560.5
 531.4
 527.9
615.3
 611.9
 606.1
 603.6
 594.8
Baskin-Robbins International1,307.7
 1,273.5
 1,335.6
 1,344.3
 1,338.9
1,496.6
 1,459.8
 1,348.2
 1,307.7
 1,273.5
Total systemwide sales$10,844.6
 10,169.6
 9,773.4
 9,301.3
 8,794.6
$12,174.9
 11,634.0
 11,146.6
 10,844.6
 10,169.6
Systemwide Sales Growth (Decline)(9):
                  
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.7.9 % 6.2 % 6.4 % 7.6 % 5.6%
Dunkin’ Donuts International4.2 % (2.8)% 2.9 % 3.2 % 4.2%
Dunkin’ U.S.5.0% 3.9 % 2.8 % 7.9 % 6.2 %
Dunkin’ International7.6% 5.7 % 3.7 % 4.2 % (2.8)%
Baskin-Robbins U.S.1.5 % 6.1 % 5.5 % 0.7 % 1.6%0.6% 1.0 % 0.4 % 1.5 % 6.1 %
Baskin-Robbins International2.7 % (4.6)% (0.6)% 0.4 % 5.5%2.5% 8.3 % 3.1 % 2.7 % (4.6)%
Total systemwide sales growth6.6 % 4.1 % 5.1 % 5.8 % 5.2%4.6% 4.4 % 2.8 % 6.6 % 4.1 %


(1)Fiscal year 2012 includes a $20.7 million incremental legal reserve recordedPrior period information for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 has been restated for the adoption of guidance related to revenue recognition in the secondfirst quarter of fiscal year 2018, while prior period information for fiscal year 2015 has not been restated and is, therefore, not comparable to the fiscal year 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 information. Prior period information for fiscal years 2018, 2017, 2016, and 2015 has not been restated for the adoption of new guidance related to lease accounting, and is, therefore, not comparable to the Quebec Superior Court’s ruling in the Bertico litigation, in which the Court found for the Plaintiffs and issued a judgment against Dunkin’ Brands in the amount of approximately C$16.4 million, plus costs and interest. Fiscalfiscal year 2015 includes a net reduction to legal reserves for the Bertico litigation and related matters of $2.8 million, as a result of the Quebec Court of Appeals (Montreal) ruling to reduce the damages assessed against the Company in the Bertico litigation from approximately C$16.4 million to approximately C$10.9 million, plus costs and interest. Fiscal year 2016 includes a net reduction to legal reserves for the Bertico litigation and related matters of $428 thousand based upon final agreement of interest and related costs associated with the judgment.2019 information.
(2)Fiscal year 2015 includes an impairment of our equity method investment in the Japan joint venture of $54.3 million.
(3)Includes capitalfinance lease obligations of $8.1$7.7 million, $8.0$7.5 million, $7.8 million, $8.1 million, $7.4 million, and $7.6$8.0 million as of December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018, December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, December 27, 2014, December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012, respectively.





- 29-





(4)Adjusted operating income and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures reflecting operating income and net income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, long-lived asset impairments, impairment of joint ventures, and other non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual charges, net of the tax impact of such adjustments in the case of adjusted net income. Adjusted net income for fiscal year 2017 also excludes the net tax benefit due to the enactment of the tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”) during fiscal year 2017. The Company uses adjusted operating income and adjusted net income as key performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance internally. We also believe adjusted operating income and adjusted net income provide our investors with useful information regarding our historical operating results. These non-GAAP measurements are not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP. Use of the terms adjusted operating income and adjusted net income may differ from similar measures reported by other companies. Adjusted operating income and adjusted net income are reconciled from operating income and net income, respectively, determined under GAAP as follows:
 Fiscal Year
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
 (Unaudited, $ in thousands)
Operating income$414,714
 319,567
 338,858
 304,736
 239,429
Adjustments:         
Amortization of other intangible assets22,079
 24,688
 25,760
 26,943
 26,943
Long-lived asset impairment charges149
 623
 1,484
 563
 1,278
Third-party product volume guarantee
 

 (300) 7,500
 
Secondary offering costs
 
 
 
 4,783
Peterborough plant closure(a)

 4,075
 
 654
 14,044
Transaction-related costs(b)
64
 424
 154
 
 
Japan joint venture impairment, net(c)

 53,853
 
 
 
Bertico litigation(d)
(428) (2,753) 
 
 20,680
Adjusted operating income(e)
$436,578
 400,477
 365,956
 340,396
 307,157
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands$195,576
 105,227
 176,357
 146,903
 108,308
Adjustments:         
Amortization of other intangible assets22,079
 24,688
 25,760
 26,943
 26,943
Long-lived asset impairment charges149
 623
 1,484
 563
 1,278
Third-party product volume guarantee
 

 (300) 7,500
 
Secondary offering costs
 
 
 
 4,783
Peterborough plant closure(a)

 4,075
 
 654
 14,044
Transaction-related costs(b)
64
 424
 154
 
 
Japan joint venture impairment, net(c)

 53,853
 
 
 
Bertico litigation(d)
(428) (2,753) 
 
 20,680
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions
 20,554
 13,735
 5,018
 3,963
Tax impact of adjustments, excluding Bertico litigation(f)
(8,917) (20,145) (16,333) (16,271) (20,404)
Tax impact of Bertico adjustment(g)
171
 1,101
 
 
 (3,980)
Income tax audit settlements(h)

 
 (6,717) (8,417) (10,514)
Tax impact of legal entity conversion(i)

 246
 (8,541) 
 
State tax apportionment(j)

 
 514
 2,868
 4,599
Adjusted net income$208,694
 187,893
 186,113
 165,761
 149,700
 Fiscal year
 2019 2018 
2017(a)
 
2016(a)
 
2015(a)
 (Unaudited, $ in thousands)
Operating income$451,050
 411,832
 391,042
 380,602
 319,567
Adjustments:         
Amortization of other intangible assets18,454
 21,113
 21,335
 22,079
 24,688
Long-lived asset impairment charges551
 1,648
 1,617
 149
 623
Peterborough plant closure(b)

 
 
 
 4,075
Transaction-related costs(c)

 
 
 64
 424
Japan joint venture impairment, net(d)

 
 
 
 53,853
Bertico-related litigation(e)

 
 (2,898) (428) (2,753)
Adjusted operating income(f)
$470,055
 434,593
 411,096
 402,466
 400,477
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands$242,024
 229,906
 271,209
 175,289
 105,227
Adjustments:         
Amortization of other intangible assets18,454
 21,113
 21,335
 22,079
 24,688
Long-lived asset impairment charges551
 1,648
 1,617
 149
 623
Peterborough plant closure(b)

 
 
 
 4,075
Transaction-related costs(c)

 
 
 64
 424
Japan joint venture impairment, net(d)

 
 
 
 53,853
Bertico-related litigation(e)

 
 (2,898) (428) (2,753)
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions13,076
 
 6,996
 
 20,554
Tax impact of adjustments(g)
(8,983) (6,373) (10,820) (8,746) (19,044)
Tax impact of legal entity conversion(h)

 
 
 
 246
Impact of tax reform(i)

 
 (96,803) 
 
Adjusted net income$265,122
 246,294
 190,636
 188,407
 187,893
(a)Prior period information for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 has been restated for the adoption of new guidance related to revenue recognition in the first quarter of fiscal year 2018, while prior period information for fiscal year 2015 has not been restated and is, therefore, not comparable to the fiscal year 2019, 2018, 2017, and 2016 information.
(b)For fiscal year 2012,2015, the adjustment includes $3.4 million of severance and other payroll-related costs, $4.2 million of accelerated depreciation, $2.7 million of incremental costs of ice cream products, and $1.6 million of other transition-relatedrepresents costs incurred related to the final settlement of the Canadian pension plan as a result of the closure of the Baskin-Robbins ice cream manufacturing plant in Peterborough, Canada. The amount for fiscal year 2012 also reflects the one-time delay in revenue recognition, net of related cost of ice cream and other products, related to the shift in manufacturing to Dean Foods of $2.1 million. For fiscal year 2013, the adjustment represents transition-related general and administrative costs incurred related to the plant closure, such as


- 30-



information technology integration, project management, and transportation costs. For fiscal year 2015, the adjustment represents costs incurred related to the final settlement of the Canadian pension plan as a result of the plant closure.
(b)(c)Represents non-capitalizable costs incurred in connection with obtaining a new securitized financing facility, which was completed in January 2015.
(c)(d)Amount consists of an other-than-temporary impairment of the investment in the Japan joint venture of $54.3 million, less a reduction in depreciation and amortization of $0.4 million resulting from the allocation of the impairment charge to the underlying long-lived assets of the joint venture.
(d)(e)For fiscal year 2012, the adjustment represents the incremental legal reserve recorded in the second quarter of 2012 related to the Quebec Superior Court’s ruling in the Bertico litigation, in which the Court found for the Plaintiffs and issued a judgment against Dunkin’ Brands in the amount of approximately C$16.4 million (approximately $15.9 million), plus costs and interest. The adjustment for fiscal year 2015 represents the net reduction to legal reserves for the Bertico litigation and related matters of $2.8 million, as a result of the Quebec Court of Appeals (Montreal) ruling to reduce the damages assessed against the Company in the Bertico litigation from approximately C$16.4 million to approximately C$10.9 million, plus costs and interest. The adjustment for the fiscal year 2016 represents a net reduction to legal reserves for the Bertico litigation and related matters of $428 thousand based upon final agreement of interest and related costs associated with the judgment.


- 30-



costs and interest. The adjustment for fiscal year 2016 represents a net reduction to legal reserves for the Bertico litigation and related matters of $428 thousand based upon final agreement of interest and related costs associated with the judgment. The adjustment for fiscal year 2017 represents a reduction to legal reserves for Bertico-related litigation of $2.9 million based upon final settlement of such matters.
(e)(f)Adjusted operating income includes the impact of the 53rd week for fiscal year 2016. Based on our estimate of that extra week on certain revenues and expenses, the impact of the extra week in fiscal year 2016 on adjusted operating income was approximately $6.1 million. Excluding the impact of the extra week, adjusted operating income for fiscal year 2016 would have been approximately $430.5$396.4 million on a 52-week basis.
(f)(g)Tax impact of adjustments calculated at a 40% effective tax rate for each period presented,of the fiscal years 2017, 2016, and 2015, excluding the Japan joint venture impairment as there was no tax impact related to this charge and the Bertico litigation adjustment for which the tax impact is calculated separately.
(g)charge. Tax impact of Bertico litigation adjustments calculated as if the adjustments had not been recorded, considering deductibility and statutory tax rates in effectat a 28% effective rate for the respective fiscal years.years 2019 and 2018.
(h)
Represents incomethe net tax benefits resulting from the settlementimpact of historical tax positions settled during the prior period, primarily relatedconverting Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. to the accounting for the acquisition of the Company by private equity firms in 2006.Dunkin Brands Canada ULC.
(i)
Represents the netNet tax impact of converting Dunkin Brands Canada Ltd. to Dunkin Brands Canada ULC.
(j)Represents tax expense recognizedbenefit due to an increase in our overall statethe enactment of the Tax Act during fiscal year 2017, consisting primarily of the remeasurement of deferred tax rate for a shift inliabilities using the apportionment of income to certain state jurisdictions.lower enacted corporate tax rate.
(5)Represents period end points of distribution. Beginning in fiscal year 2016, restaurants located in Puerto Rico were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility. Prior year amounts have been revised to reflect these changes for all years presented.
(6)Represents the growth in average weekly sales for franchisee- and company-operated restaurants that have been open at least 78 weeks (approximately 18 months) that have reported sales in the current and comparable prior year week.
(7)Generally represents the growth in local currency average monthly sales for franchisee-operated restaurants, including joint ventures, that have been open at least 13 months and that have reported sales in the current and comparable prior year month.
(8)Systemwide sales include sales at franchisee- and company-operated restaurants, including joint ventures. While we do not record sales by franchisees, licensees, or joint ventures as revenue, and such sales are not included in our consolidated financial statements, we believe that this operating measure is important in obtaining an understanding of our financial performance. We believe systemwide sales information aids in understanding how we derive royalty revenue and in evaluating our performance relative to competitors. Beginning in the fiscal year 2016, we began presenting systemwide sales rather than franchisee-reported sales, which excluded sales of company-operated restaurants, as we believe the systemwide sales information is a more complete metric in obtaining an understanding of our financial performance. Additionally, systemwide sales related to restaurants located in Puerto Rico were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility for all years presented.
(9)Systemwide sales growth represents the percentage change in systemwide sales from the comparable period of the prior year. Changes in systemwide sales are driven by changes in average comparable store sales and changes in the number of restaurants. Percentage change in systemwide sales for all prior years presented was revised for systemwide sales related to restaurants located in Puerto Rico that were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility.




- 31-





Item 7.Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the selected financial data and the audited consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018 compared to the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 is included under the heading Item 7 "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 29, 2018 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") on February 26, 2019.
This discussion contains forward-looking statements about our markets, the demand for our products and services and our future results and involves numerous risks and uncertainties. Generally these statements can be identified by the use of words such as “anticipate,” “believe,” “could,” “estimate,” “expect,” “feel,” “forecast,” “intend,” “may,” “plan,” “potential,” “project,” “should” or “would” and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. Our forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, which may cause actual results to differ materially from those projected or implied by the forward-looking statement. Forward-looking statements are based on current expectations and assumptions and currently available data and are neither predictions nor guarantees of future events or performance. You should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. See “Risk factors” for a discussion of factors that could cause our actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by forward-looking statements.
Introduction and overview
We are one of the world’s leading franchisors of quick service restaurants (“QSRs”) serving hot and cold coffee and baked goods, as well as hard serve ice cream. We franchise restaurants under our Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins brands. With over 20,000more than 21,000 points of distribution in more than 60 countries worldwide, we believe that our portfolio has strong brand awareness in our key markets. QSR is a restaurant format characterized by counter or drive-thru ordering and limited or no table service. As of December 31, 201628, 2019, Dunkin’ Donuts had 12,25813,137 global points of distribution with restaurants in 4143 U.S. states, and the District of Columbia and in 4440 foreign countries. Baskin-Robbins had 7,8228,160 global points of distribution as of the same date, with restaurants in 4344 U.S. states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, and in 51 foreign countries.
We are organized into fourfive reporting segments: Dunkin’ Donuts U.S., Dunkin’ Donuts International, Baskin-Robbins U.S., Baskin-Robbins International, and Baskin-Robbins International.U.S. Advertising Funds. We generate revenue from fourfive primary sources: (i) royalty income and franchise fees associated with franchised restaurants, (ii) continuing advertising fees from Dunkin’ and Baskin-Robbins franchisees and breakage and other revenue related to the gift card program, (iii) rental income from restaurant properties that we lease or sublease to franchisees, (iii)(iv) sales of ice cream and other products to franchisees in certain international markets, and (iv)(v) other income including fees for the licensing of our brands for products sold in certain retail outlets, the licensing of the rightrights to manufacture Baskin-Robbins ice cream products sold to U.S. franchisees, refranchising gains, transfer fees from franchisees, and online training fees. Prior to completing the sale of all company-operated restaurants in fiscal year 2016, we also generated revenue from retail store sales at our company-operated restaurants.
Approximately 66%44% of our revenue for fiscal year 20162019 was derived from royalty income and franchise fees. Additionally, advertising fees and related income accounted for approximately 36% of our revenue for fiscal year 2019. Rental income from franchisees that lease or sublease their properties from us accounted for 12%9% of our revenue for fiscal year 20162019. An additional 14%7% of our revenue for fiscal year 20162019 was generated from sales of ice cream and other products to franchisees in certain international markets. The balance of our revenue for fiscal year 20162019 consisted of revenue from our company-operated restaurants, license fees on products sold in non-franchised outlets, license fees on sales of ice cream and other products to Baskin-Robbins franchisees in the U.S., refranchising gains, transfer fees from franchisees, and online training fees.
Franchisees fund the vast majority of the cost of new restaurant development. As a result, we are able to grow our system with lower capital requirements than many of our competitors. With no company-operated points of distribution as of December 31, 201628, 2019, we are less affected by store-level costs, profitability, and fluctuations in commodity costs than other QSR operators.
Our franchisees fund substantially all of the advertising that supports both brands. Those advertising funds also fundbrands, including the cost of our marketing, research and development, and innovation personnel. Royalty payments and advertising fund contributionsfee payments are typically are made on a weekly basis for restaurants in the U.S., which limit our working capital needs. For fiscal year 2016, franchisee contributions to the U.S. advertising funds were $430.3 million.
We operate and report financial information on a 52- or 53-week year on a 13-week quarter basis with the fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December and fiscal quarters ending on the 13th Saturday of each quarter (or 14th Saturday when applicable with respect to the fourth fiscal quarter). The data periods contained within fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019 and 20142018 reflect the results of operations for the 53-week, 52 week, and 52-week periods ending on December 31, 2016, 28, 2019 and December 26, 2015, and December 27, 201429, 2018, respectively. Certain financial measures and other metrics have been presented with
The Company adopted new lease guidance in the impactfirst quarter of the additional week on the results for fiscal year 2016. The impact2019 using the modified retrospective transition method and elected the option to not restate comparative periods in the year of the additional week in fiscal year 2016 reflects our estimateadoption, including amounts as of the 53rd week on systemwide sales growth, revenues, and expenses.December 29,




- 32-





2018 and for fiscal years ended 2018 and 2017. See note 2(v) to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of Part II of this Form 10-K for further disclosure of the impact of the new guidance.
Selected operating and financial highlights
Fiscal yearFiscal year
2016 2015 20142019 2018
Systemwide sales growth6.6 % 4.1 % 5.1 %
Comparable store sales growth (decline):     
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.1.6 % 1.4 % 1.7 %
Dunkin’ Donuts International(1.9)% 0.5 % (2.0)%
Baskin-Robbins U.S.0.7 % 6.1 % 4.9 %
Baskin-Robbins International(4.2)% (1.9)% (1.2)%
($ in thousands)
Total revenues$828,889
 810,933
 748,709
$1,370,227
 1,321,617
Operating income414,714
 319,567
 338,858
451,050
 411,832
Adjusted operating income436,578
 400,477
 365,956
470,055
 434,593
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands195,576
 105,227
 176,357
Net income242,024
 229,906
Adjusted net income208,694
 187,893
 186,113
265,122
 246,294
Systemwide sales growth4.6% 4.4 %
Comparable store sales growth (decline):   
Dunkin’ U.S.2.1% 0.6 %
Dunkin’ International5.7% 2.2 %
Baskin-Robbins U.S.0.8% (0.6)%
Baskin-Robbins International1.9% 3.8 %
Adjusted operating income and adjusted net income are non-GAAP measures reflecting operating income and net income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, long-lived asset impairments, impairments of investments in joint ventures,impairment charges, and othercertain non-recurring, infrequent, or unusual charges, net of the tax impact of such adjustments in the case of adjusted net income. The Company uses adjusted operating income and adjusted net income as key performance measures for the purpose of evaluating performance internally. We also believe adjusted operating income and adjusted net income provide our investors with useful information regarding our historical operating results. These non-GAAP measurements are not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP. Use of the terms adjusted operating income and adjusted net income may differ from similar measures reported by other companies. See note 4 to “Selected Financial Data” for reconciliations of operating income and net income determined under GAAP to adjusted operating income and adjusted net income, respectively.
Systemwide sales and points of distribution information related to restaurants located in Puerto Rico were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility. Prior year amounts below have been revised to reflect these changes for all years presented.
Fiscal year 20162019 compared to fiscal year 20152018
Overall growth in systemwide sales of 6.6%4.6% for fiscal year 2016, or 5.2% on a 52-week basis,2019 resulted from the following:
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales growth of 7.9%5.0%, which was the result of 397211 net new restaurants opened in fiscal year 20162019 and comparable store sales growth of 1.6%2.1%. The increase in comparable store sales was driven by an increase in average ticket, which was favorably impacted by price and unfavorably impacted by units per transaction, offset by a decline in traffic. The growthincrease in salesaverage ticket was driven by favorable mix shift to premium-priced espresso and cold brew beverages led by iced coffee, including Cold Brew, and hot and iced espresso-based beverages,breakfast sandwiches, as well as breakfast sandwiches, ledstrategic pricing increases, offset by limited-time-offer products. Approximately 190 basis points of thean increase in systemwide sales was attributable to the extra week in fiscal year 2016.discounting driven by our national value promotions.
Dunkin’ Donuts International systemwide sales growth of 4.2%7.6% as a result of sales increasesgrowth in Europe, the Middle East, Asia, Europe, South Korea, and South America, offset by a decline in salesLatin America. Sales in South Korea. Systemwide sales in all of these regionsKorea, Latin America, Europe, and the Middle East were negatively impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange rates, while systemwide sales in Asia were positively impacted by favorable foreign exchange rates. On a constant currency basis, systemwide sales for fiscal year 20162019 increased by approximately 7%11%. Dunkin’ Donuts International comparable store sales decreased 1.9%increased 5.7% due primarily to declines in South Korea and Europe, offset by growth in South America.across all the regions.
Baskin-Robbins U.S. systemwide sales growth of 1.5% resulting primarily from0.6%, which was the result of comparable store sales growth of 0.7%. Comparable0.8%, offset by 26 net closings during fiscal year 2019. The increase in comparable store sales growth was driven by an increase in average ticket, offset by a decline in traffic. Sales growth was driven primarily by increased sales of the take-home category, cups and cones, which was a resultand beverages increased while sales of increased scoop salessundaes and the new Warm Cookie Sandwich platform. Approximately 130 basis points of the increase in systemwide sales was attributable to the extra week indesserts decreased during fiscal year 2016.2019.
Baskin-Robbins International systemwide sales growth of 2.7%2.5%, driven by a sales increasegrowth in Japan,South Korea, the Middle East, Europe, Australia, and Canada, offset by sales declines in Japan and Asia. Sales in South Korea, Australia, Asia, and the Middle East. SalesEurope were negatively impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange rates, while sales in Japan were positively impacted by favorable foreign exchange rates, while sales in all other regions were negatively impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange rates, most notably


- 33-



South Korea.rates. On a constant currency basis, systemwide sales for fiscal year 20162019 increased by approximately 1%5%. Baskin-Robbins International comparable store sales declined 4.2% drivenincreased 1.9% due primarily by declinesto growth in South Korea, and the Middle East, offset by growth ina decline Japan.


- 33-



Changes in systemwide sales are impacted, in part, by changes in the number of points of distribution. Points of distribution and net openings (closings) as of and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 were as follows:
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018
Points of distribution, at period end:      
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.8,828
 8,431
Dunkin’ Donuts International3,430
 3,319
Dunkin’ U.S.9,630
 9,419
Dunkin’ International3,507
 3,452
Baskin-Robbins U.S.2,538
 2,529
2,524
 2,550
Baskin-Robbins International5,284
 5,078
5,636
 5,491
Consolidated global points of distribution20,080
 19,357
21,297
 20,912
      
Fiscal yearFiscal year
2016 20152019 2018
Net openings, during the period:   
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.(1)
397
 349
Dunkin’ Donuts International111
 91
Net openings (closings), during the period:   
Dunkin’ U.S.211
 278
Dunkin’ International55
 55
Baskin-Robbins U.S.9
 
(26) (10)
Baskin-Robbins International206
 55
145
 69
Consolidated global net openings723
 495
385
 392
(1)Net openings for Dunkin' Donuts U.S. for fiscal years 2016 and 2015 reflect the previously-announced closing of 18 and 81 self-serve coffee stations within Speedway locations, respectively.
The increase in totalTotal revenues of $18.0increased $48.6 million, or 2.2%3.7%, for fiscal year 2016 resulted2019, due primarily from a $36.3to increases in franchise fees and royalty income of $26.1 million, rental income of $18.3 million, and advertising fees and related income of $5.7 million. The increase in franchise fees and royalty income was driven primarily by the increase in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales and the extra week in fiscal year 2016. These increases in revenues weregrowth, offset by a decrease in sales at company-operated restaurantsfranchise fees due to additional franchisee incentives, including investments to support the Dunkin' U.S. Blueprint for Growth, that are being recognized over the remaining term of $16.4 million driven byeach respective franchise agreement. The increase in rental income for fiscal year 2019 was due primarily to the adoption of a net decreasenew lease accounting standard in the numberfirst quarter of company-operated restaurants, as well asfiscal year 2019, which requires gross presentation of certain lease costs that the Company passes through to franchisees. See note 2(v) of the consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of the impact of the new guidance. The increase in advertising fees and related income was driven primarily by Dunkin’ U.S. systemwide sales growth, offset by a decrease in other revenuesgift card program service fees as a result of $2.2additional fees collected in the prior year to cover certain gift card program costs.
Operating income and adjusted operating income increased $39.2 million, or 9.5%, and $35.5 million, or 8.2%, respectively, for fiscal year 2019, due primarily to revenue recorded in the prior fiscal year in connection with a settlement reached with a master licensee. Approximately $8.8 million of the increase in total revenues was attributable toroyalty income and a decrease in general and administrative expenses, offset by the extra weekdecrease in fiscal year 2016, consisting primarily of additional royalty income.franchise fees.
OperatingNet income and adjusted net income increased $95.1$12.1 million, or 29.8%5.3%, and $18.8 million, or 7.6%, respectively, for fiscal year 2016 due primarily to an impairment2019 as a result of our investment in the Japan joint venture (“Japan JV”) in the prior fiscal year, the increase in franchise fees and royalty income, and gains recognized in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants. These increases in operating income wereand adjusted operating income, respectively, and an increase in interest income earned on our cash balances, offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses. Approximately $6.1 million of the increase in operating income was attributable to the extra weektax expense. Net income in fiscal year 2016, consisting primarily of additional royalty income, offset2019 was also unfavorably impacted by additional personnel costs.
Adjusted operating income increased $36.1 million, or 9.0%, for fiscal year 2016 driven by the increases in franchise fees and royalty income, as well as the gains recognized in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants. These increases in revenues were offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses. Approximately $6.1 million of the increase in adjusted operating income was attributable to the extra week in fiscal year 2016, consisting primarily of additional royalty income, offset by additional personnel costs.
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands increased $90.3 million, or 85.9%, for fiscal year 2016 as a result of the $95.1 million increase in operating income and a $20.6$13.1 million loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions recorded in the prior fiscal year, offset by increases in income tax expense of $21.3 million and net interest expense of $3.9 million driven by additional borrowings incurred in conjunction with the securitization refinancing transaction completed during January 2015. Also contributing to the increase in net interest expense was the extra week in fiscal year 2016.
Adjusted net income increased $20.8 million, or 11.1%, for fiscal year 2016 resulting primarily from the $36.1 million increase in adjusted operating income, offset by increases in income tax expense and net interest expense.


- 34-



Fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014
Overall growth in systemwide sales of 4.1% for fiscal year 2015, resulted from the following:
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales growth of 6.2%, which was the result of 349 net new restaurants opened in fiscal year 2015 and comparable store sales growth of 1.4%.2019. The increase in comparable store sales was driven by an increase in average ticket, which was favorably impacted by pricing and unfavorably impacted by product mix, offset by a decline in traffic. The growth in average ticket was led by sales of beverages, including iced coffee and espresso, and donuts. In-restaurant K-Cup® sales had a negative impact on comparable store sales.
Dunkin’ Donuts International systemwide sales decline of 2.8% as a result of sales decreases in South Korea and Colombia, offset by sales increases in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. Sales in South Korea, Europe, South America, and Asia were negatively impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange rates. On a constant currency basis, systemwide sales for fiscal year 2015 increased by approximately 6%. Dunkin’ Donuts International comparable store sales increased 0.5% driven primarily by increases in Asia, South America, and the Middle East, offset by declines in Europe and South Korea.
Baskin-Robbins U.S. systemwide sales growth of 6.1% resulting primarily from comparable store sales growth of 6.1%. Baskin-Robbins U.S. comparable store sales growth was driven by increased sales of cups and cones, beverages, desserts, and sundaes, as well as increased sales of cakes stimulated by strong year-over-year growth of online cake ordering. Comparable store sales growth was driven by increases in both traffic and ticket.
Baskin-Robbins International systemwide sales decline of 4.6%, driven by sales declines in Japan, South Korea, and Europe, offset by sales growth in the Middle East and Asia. Sales in all regions were negatively impacted by unfavorable foreign exchange rates, most notably Japan and South Korea. On a constant currency basis, systemwide sales for fiscal year 2015 increased by approximately 5%. Baskin-Robbins International comparable store sales declined 1.9% driven primarily by declines in Japan and South Korea, offset by growth in the Middle East.
Changes in systemwide sales are impacted, in part, by changes in the number of points of distribution. Points of distribution and net openings as of and for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 were as follows:
 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Points of distribution, at period end:   
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.8,431
 8,082
Dunkin’ Donuts International3,319
 3,228
Baskin-Robbins U.S.2,529
 2,529
Baskin-Robbins International5,078
 5,023
Consolidated global points of distribution19,357
 18,862
    
 Fiscal year ended
 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Net openings, during the period:   
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.349
 387
Dunkin’ Donuts International91
 65
Baskin-Robbins U.S.
 17
Baskin-Robbins International55
 235
Consolidated global net openings495
 704
The increase in total revenues of $62.2 million, or 8.3%, for fiscal year 2015 resulted primarily from a $30.9 million increase in franchise fees and royalty income driven by the increase in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales and additional franchise fees due to favorable development mix and additional gross development, and an increase in other revenues of $24.7 million, due primarily to licensing fees earned from the Dunkin’ K-Cup® pod licensing agreement. Also contributing to the increase in revenues for fiscal year 2015 was an increase in sales at company-operated restaurants of $6.1 million, driven by a net increase in the number of company-operated restaurants.
Operating income decreased $19.3 million, or 5.7%, for fiscal year 2015 driven by a $54.3 million impairment of our investment in the Japan JV, an increase in general and administrative expenses driven primarily by incremental incentive compensation accruals, an increase in share-based compensation, and costs incurred related to the final settlement of our


- 35-



Canadian pension plan as a result of the closure of our Canadian ice cream manufacturing plant in fiscal year 2012. Also contributing to the decrease in operating income was a decrease in other operating income due to the timing of the sale of real estate and a gain recognized in the prior year in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants in the Atlanta market. These items were offset by the increase in franchise fees and royalty income, licensing fees earned from the sale of Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods, and an increase in ice cream margin.
Adjusted operating income increased $34.5 million, or 9.4%, for fiscal year 2015 driven by the increases in franchise fees and royalty income, licensing fees earned from the Dunkin’ K-Cup® pod licensing agreement, and ice cream margin. The increases in revenues and ice cream margin were offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses, net, driven primarily by incremental incentive compensation accruals and share-based compensation, and a decrease in other operating income due to the timing of the sale of real estate and a gain recognized in the prior year in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants in the Atlanta market.
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands decreased $71.1 million, or 40.3%, for fiscal year 2015 as a result of the $19.3 million decrease in operating income, a $28.5 million increase in net interest expense driven by additional borrowings incurred in conjunction with the securitization refinancing transaction completed during January 2015, a $16.2 million increase in income tax expense aswas driven primarily by excess tax benefits from share-based compensation of $4.7 million in fiscal year 2019 compared to $19.7 million in the prior year was favorably impacted by tax benefits resulting from a restructuring of our Canadian subsidiaries, and a $6.8 millionthe increase in lossincome in the current year, offset by a valuation allowance recorded on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions.

Adjusted net income increasedforeign tax credit carryforwards of $1.8 million or 1.0%, forin the prior year, which was released in fiscal year 2015 resulting primarily from a $34.5 million increase in adjusted operating income, offset by increases in net interest expense and income tax expense.2019. 
Earnings per share
Earnings per share of common sharestock and diluted adjusted earnings per share of common sharestock were as follows:
Fiscal yearFiscal year
2016 2015 20142019 2018
Earnings per share:     
Earnings per share of common stock:   
Common – basic$2.14
 1.10
 1.67
$2.92
 2.75
Common – diluted2.11
 1.08
 1.65
2.89
 2.71
Diluted adjusted earnings per share2.26
 1.93
 1.74
Diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock3.17
 2.90


- 34-



Diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock is calculated using adjusted net income, as defined above, and diluted weighted averageweighted-average shares outstanding. Diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock is not a presentation made in accordance with GAAP, and our use of the term diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock may vary from similar measures reported by others in our industry due to the potential differences in the method of calculation. Diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock should not be considered as an alternative to earnings per share of common stock derived in accordance with GAAP. Diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock has important limitations as an analytical tool and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Because of these limitations, we rely primarily on our GAAP results. However, we believe that presenting diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock is appropriate to provide investors with useful information regarding our historical operating results.
The following table sets forth the computation of diluted adjusted earnings per share:
 Fiscal year
 2016 2015 2014
Adjusted net income$208,694
 187,893
 186,113
Weighted average number of common shares–diluted92,538,282
 97,131,674
 106,705,778
Diluted adjusted earnings per share$2.26
 1.93
 1.74
 Fiscal year
 2019 2018
Adjusted net income$265,122
 246,294
Weighted-average number of common shares–diluted83,674,613
 84,960,791
Diluted adjusted earnings per share of common stock$3.17
 2.90




- 36-35-





Results of operations
Fiscal year 20162019 compared to fiscal year 20152018
Consolidated results of operations
Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %2019 2018$ %
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
Franchise fees and royalty income$549,571
 513,222
 36,349
 7.1 %$604,431
 578,342
 26,089
 4.5 %
Advertising fees and related income499,303
 493,590
 5,713
 1.2 %
Rental income101,020
 100,422
 598
 0.6 %122,671
 104,413
 18,258
 17.5 %
Sales of ice cream and other products114,857
 115,252
 (395) (0.3)%91,362
 95,197
 (3,835) (4.0)%
Sales at company-operated restaurants11,975
 28,340
 (16,365) (57.7)%
Other revenues51,466
 53,697
 (2,231) (4.2)%52,460
 50,075
 2,385
 4.8 %
Total revenues$828,889
 810,933
 17,956
 2.2 %$1,370,227
 1,321,617
 48,610
 3.7 %
Total revenues increased $18.0$48.6 million, or 2.2%3.7%, in fiscal year 20162019, drivendue primarily to increases in franchise fees and royalty income, rental income, advertising fees and related income, and other revenues, offset by ana decrease in sales of ice cream and other products. The increase in franchise fees and royalty income was driven primarily by Dunkin’ U.S. systemwide sales growth, offset by additional franchisee incentives, including investments to support the Dunkin' U.S. Blueprint for Growth, that are being recognized over the remaining term of $36.3 million, or 7.1%,each respective franchise agreement. The increase in rental income was due primarily to the adoption of the new lease accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. See note 2(v) of the consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of the impact of the new guidance. The increase in advertising fees and related income was driven primarily by Dunkin’ U.S. systemwide sales growth, offset by a decrease in gift card program service fees as a result of Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales growth andadditional fees collected in the extra week inprior fiscal year 2016, as well as anto cover certain gift card program costs. The increase in rental income of $0.6 millionother revenues was driven primarily by an increase in the number of leases. These increases in revenues were offset by a decrease in sales at company-operated restaurants of $16.4 million driven by a net decrease in the number of company-operated restaurants. All remaining company-operated points of distribution were sold during fiscal year 2016. Also offsetting the increase in revenues was a decrease in other revenues of $2.2 million due primarilylicense fees related to revenue recorded in the prior fiscal year in connection with a settlement reached with a master licensee, a decrease in refranchising gains, and a one-time upfront license fee recognized in connection with the Dunkin’ K-Cup® pod licensing agreement in the prior fiscal year, offset by increases in transfer feespods and licensing income. Sales of ice cream and other products decreased by $0.4 million. Approximately $8.8 million of the increase in total revenues was attributable to the extra week in fiscal year 2016, consisting primarily of additional royalty income.retail packaged coffee.
Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %2019 2018$ %
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
Occupancy expenses – franchised restaurants$57,409
 54,611
 2,798
 5.1 %$79,244
 58,102
 21,142
 36.4 %
Cost of ice cream and other products77,608
 76,877
 731
 1.0 %75,771
 77,412
 (1,641) (2.1)%
Company-operated restaurant expenses13,591
 29,900
 (16,309) (54.5)%
General and administrative expenses, net246,814
 243,796
 3,018
 1.2 %
Advertising expenses506,755
 498,019
 8,736
 1.8 %
General and administrative expenses238,678
 246,792
 (8,114) (3.3)%
Depreciation and amortization42,537
 45,244
 (2,707) (6.0)%36,883
 41,045
 (4,162) (10.1)%
Long-lived asset impairment charges149
 623
 (474) (76.1)%551
 1,648
 (1,097) (66.6)%
Total operating costs and expenses$438,108
 451,051
 (12,943) (2.9)%$937,882
 923,018
 14,864
 1.6 %
Net income (loss) of equity method investments14,552
 (41,745) 56,297
 n/m
Other operating income, net9,381
 1,430
 7,951
 556.0 %
Net income of equity method investments17,517
 14,903
 2,614
 17.5 %
Other operating income (loss), net1,188
 (1,670) 2,858
 n/m
Operating income$414,714
 319,567
 95,147
 29.8 %$451,050
 411,832
 39,218
 9.5 %
Occupancy expenses for franchised restaurants for fiscal year 20162019 increased $2.8$21.1 million, or 5.1%36.4%, resulting primarily from the prioradoption of the new lease accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal year due primarily2019. See note 2(v) of the consolidated financial statements. The new standard requires gross presentation of certain lease costs that the Company passes through to expenses incurred to record lease-related liabilities as a resultfranchisees, and also resulted in amortization of certain lease terminations, as well as an increaseintangible assets, which were previously recorded within amortization of other intangible assets in the numberconsolidated statements of leases for operations, being recorded within occupancy expenses—franchised locations.restaurants in the consolidated statements of operations in fiscal year 2019.
Net margin on ice cream products decreased $1.1$2.2 million for fiscal year 20162019 to $37.2$15.6 million due primarily to an increase in commodity costs and a declinedecrease in sales volume.
Company-operated restaurantAdvertising expenses decreased $16.3increased $8.7 million or 54.5%, fromfor fiscal year 2019 driven primarily by the prior year primarily as a result of a net decreaseincrease in the number of company-operated restaurants.advertising fees and related income.
General and administrative expenses increased $3.0decreased $8.1 million, or 1.2%3.3%, in fiscal year 20162019 due primarily to an increase in consulting fees, a reduction in legal reserves recorded in the prior fiscal year, and an increasedecrease in personnel costs due partiallyas well as a decrease in legal expenses, including a recovery of fees in the third quarter of fiscal year 2019. Also


- 36-



contributing to the 53rd week in the fiscal year. These increasesdecrease in general and administrative expenses were offset by costsexpenses incurred in the prior fiscal year related2018 in connection with our 2018 Global Convention and to support the final settlement of our Canadian pension plan, a decreaseDunkin' U.S. Blueprint for Growth investments. Offsetting these decreases in general and administrative expenses were increases in costs to support brand-building activities and increases in bad debt expense and costs incurred in the prior fiscal year to support brand-building activities.


- 37-



professional fees.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $2.7$4.2 million for fiscal year 2019 resulting primarily from the adoption of the new lease accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019, which resulted in amortization of certain lease intangible assets, which was previously recorded within amortization of other intangible assets in the consolidated statements of operations, being recorded within occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants in the consolidated statements of operations in fiscal year 2016 resulting primarily from2019. Also contributing to the decrease in depreciation and amortization was a decrease in amortization due to certain intangibledepreciation as assets becomingbecome fully amortized and favorable lease intangible assets being written-off upon termination of the related leases.depreciated.
The decrease in long-livedLong-lived asset impairment charges indecreased $1.1 million from the prior fiscal year 2016 of $0.5 million was driven primarily byyear. Such charges generally fluctuate based on the timing of lease terminations which resulted inand the related write-off of favorable lease intangible assets and leasehold improvements.
Net income (loss) of equity method investments increased $56.3$2.6 million infor fiscal year 2016 as the prior fiscal year included2019 due primarily to an impairment of our investment in the Japan JV of $54.3 million as a result of an other-than-temporary decline in the value of our investment. Also contributing to the increase was an increase in net income from our Japan JV, offset by a decrease in net income from our South Korea joint venture.
Other operating income (loss), net, which includes net gains and losses recognized in connection with the sale or disposal of real estateproperty, equipment, and company-operated restaurants andsoftware, fluctuates based on the timing of such transactions. Other operating income for fiscal year 2016 includes gains totaling $7.6 million recognized in connection with the sale of the company-operated restaurants in the Dallas, Texas and Boston, Massachusetts markets.
Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %2019 2018$ %
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
Interest expense, net$100,270
 96,341
 3,929
 4.1 %$118,477
 121,548
 (3,071) (2.5)%
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions
 20,554
 (20,554) (100.0)%13,076
 
 13,076
 100.0 %
Other losses, net1,195
 1,084
 111
 10.2 %
Other loss (income), net235
 1,083
 (848) (78.3)%
Total other expense$101,465
 117,979
 (16,514) (14.0)%$131,788
 122,631
 9,157
 7.5 %
The increasedecrease in net interest expense for fiscal year 20162019 of $3.9$3.1 million was driven primarily by increases in interest income earned on our cash balances, as well as increases in interest capitalized during the acquisition period of certain capital assets, offset by the impact of a securitization refinancing transaction that occurredcompleted during the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, resulting in January 2015, which resulted in additional borrowings andincreased interest expense due to an increase in the weighted averageweighted-average interest rate, as well as an increase in amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs compared to the prior fiscal year. Also contributing to the increase in net interest expense was the extra week in fiscal year 2016.rate.
The loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions for fiscal year 20152019 of $20.6$13.1 million resulted fromwas due to the January 2015write-off of debt issuance costs in conjunction with the securitization refinancing transaction.transaction completed during the second quarter of fiscal year 2019.
The increasefluctuation in other losses,loss (income), net, for fiscal year 2016 was2019 resulted primarily from net foreign exchange gains and losses driven primarily by foreign exchange losses due primarily to fluctuations in the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies.
Fiscal  yearFiscal year
2016 20152019 2018
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
Income before income taxes$313,249
 201,588
$319,262
 289,201
Provision for income taxes117,673
 96,359
77,238
 59,295
Effective tax rate37.6% 47.8%24.2% 20.5%
The decreaseincrease in the effective tax rate compared to the prior fiscal year resulted primarily from the impairmentexcess tax benefits from share-based compensation of our investment$4.7 million for fiscal year 2019 compared to $19.7 million in the Japan JVprior year, offset by a valuation allowance recorded on foreign tax credit carryforwards of $1.8 million in the prior fiscal year, which reduced income before income taxes but for which there is no corresponding tax benefit. The impact of the impairment of our investmentwas released in the Japan JV was approximately 10% on the overall effective tax rate for fiscal year 2015.2019.
Operating segments
We operate fourfive reportable operating segments: Dunkin’ Donuts U.S., Dunkin’ Donuts International, Baskin-Robbins U.S., Baskin-Robbins International, and Baskin-Robbins International.U.S. Advertising Funds. We evaluate the performance of our segments and allocate resources to them based on operating income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, long-lived asset impairment charges, and othercertain non-recurring, infrequent or unusual charges, which does not reflect the allocation of any corporate charges. This profitability


- 37-



measure is referred to as segment profit. Segment profit for the Dunkin’ Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments includes net income of equity method investments, except for other-than-temporary impairment charges and the related reduction in depreciation, net of tax, on the underlying long-lived assets.


- 38-



Beginning in fiscal year 2016, certain segment profit amounts in the tables below have been reclassified as a result of the realignment of our organizational structure to better support our segment operations, including the allocation of previously unallocated costs. Additionally, revenues and segment profit related to restaurants located in Puerto Rico were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility. Prior year amounts in the tables below have been revised to reflect these changes for all years presented.
For reconciliations to total revenues and income before income taxes, see note 1211 to our consolidated financial statements included herein.statements. Revenues for all segments include only transactions with unaffiliated customers and include no intersegment revenues. Revenues not included in segment revenues include revenue earned through certain licensing arrangements with third parties in which our brand names are used, revenue generated from online training programs for franchisees, advertising fees and revenuesrelated income from international advertising funds, and breakage and other revenue related to the sale of Dunkin’ Donuts products in certain international markets,gift card program, all of which are not allocated to a specific segment.
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.
 Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$448,609
 413,692
 34,917
 8.4 %
Franchise fees40,973
 42,503
 (1,530) (3.6)%
Rental income97,540
 96,827
 713
 0.7 %
Sales at company-operated restaurants11,975
 28,340
 (16,365) (57.7)%
Other revenues8,867
 9,700
 (833) (8.6)%
Total revenues$607,964
 591,062
 16,902
 2.9 %
Segment profit$466,976
 431,065
 35,911
 8.3 %
The increase in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. revenues for fiscal year 2016 was driven primarily by an increase in royalty income of $34.9 million as a result of an increase in systemwide sales and the extra week in fiscal year 2016, offset by a decrease in sales at company-operated restaurants of $16.4 million due to a net decrease in the number of company-operated restaurants operating during the year, as well as a decrease in franchise fees of $1.5 million due to unfavorable development mix. Approximately $8.3 million Additionally, allocation of the increase in total revenues was attributable to the extra week in fiscal year 2016, consisting primarily of additional royalty income.
The increase in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. segment profit for fiscal year 2016 was driven primarily by the increase in royalty income and gains recognized in connection with the sale of company-operated restaurants. These increases in segment profit were offset by an increase in general and administrative expenses driven by an increase in personnel costs, due partially to the 53rd week in the fiscal year, as well as expenses incurred to record lease-related liabilities as a result of lease terminations and the decrease in franchise fees.
Dunkin’ Donuts International
 Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$16,791
 15,658
 1,133
 7.2 %
Franchise fees5,655
 5,017
 638
 12.7 %
Rental income
 13
 (13) (100.0)%
Other revenues457
 2,285
 (1,828) (80.0)%
Total revenues$22,903
 22,973
 (70) (0.3)%
Segment profit$9,658
 10,240
 (582) (5.7)%
The decrease in Dunkin’ Donuts International revenues for fiscal year 2016 resulted primarilyconsideration from a decrease in other revenues of $1.8 million due primarily to revenue recorded in the prior fiscal year in connection with a settlement reached with a master licensee, offset by increases in royalty income of $1.1 million and franchise fees of $0.6 million driven by development in new markets.


- 39-



The decrease in Dunkin’ Donuts International segment profit for fiscal year 2016 was due primarily to a decrease in net income from our South Korea joint venture and the decrease in revenues, offset by a decrease in general and administrative expenses.
Baskin-Robbins U.S.
 Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$28,909
 28,348
 561
 2.0 %
Franchise fees1,077
 871
 206
 23.7 %
Rental income2,994
 2,989
 5
 0.2 %
Sales of ice cream and other products2,632
 4,014
 (1,382) (34.4)%
Other revenues11,900
 10,918
 982
 9.0 %
Total revenues$47,512
 47,140
 372
 0.8 %
Segment profit$34,240
 29,289
 4,951
 16.9 %
The increase in Baskin-Robbins U.S. revenues for fiscal year 2016 was due primarily to increases in other revenues of $1.0 million driven by an increase in licensing income, royalty income of $0.6 million due primarily to the extra week in fiscal year 2016 and an increase in systemwide sales, and franchise fees of $0.2 million due to an increase in renewal income. Offsetting these increases in revenues was a decrease in sales of ice cream and other products of $1.4 million. A portionto royalty income as consideration for the use of the fluctuationsfranchise license and certain franchisee incentives are not reflected within segment revenues, but have no impact to total revenues for any segment.
Dunkin’ U.S.
 Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2019 2018$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$510,378
 483,883
 26,495
 5.5 %
Franchise fees13,498
 18,029
 (4,531) (25.1)%
Rental income118,227
 100,913
 17,314
 17.2 %
Other revenues3,991
 3,985
 6
 0.2 %
Total revenues$646,094
 606,810
 39,284
 6.5 %
Segment profit$490,193
 466,094
 24,099
 5.2 %
Dunkin’ U.S. revenues increased $39.3 million for fiscal year 2019 due primarily to an increase in licensingroyalty income anddriven by systemwide sales growth, as well as an increase in rental income. Offsetting these increases was a decrease in franchise fees due primarily to additional franchisee incentives, including investments to support the Dunkin' U.S. Blueprint for Growth, that are being recognized over the remaining term of ice cream and other products can be attributed to a shifteach respective franchise agreement. The increase in certain franchisees who previously purchased ice creamrental income resulted primarily from the Company now purchasing ice cream directly from our third-party ice cream manufacturer through which we earn a licensing fee. Approximately $0.5adoption of the new lease accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. See note 2(v) to the consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of the impact of the new guidance.
Dunkin’ U.S. segment profit increased $24.1 million offor fiscal year 2019 due primarily to the increase in total revenues was attributable to the extra week in fiscal year 2016, consisting primarily of additional royalty income.
Baskin-Robbins U.S. segment profit for fiscal year 2016 increased primarilyincome, as a result ofwell as a decrease in general and administrative expenses due primarily to expenses incurred in fiscal year 2018 to support the Dunkin' U.S. Blueprint for Growth investments and a decrease in personnel costs, offset by decreases in expenses incurred relatedfranchise fees and rental margin. The decrease in rental margin was due primarily to brand-building activities and incentive compensation. Also contributing toamortization of certain lease intangible assets, previously recorded within amortization, now included within occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants in conjunction with the increaseadoption of the new lease accounting standard in segment profit were the increases in other revenues, royalty income, and franchise fees.first quarter of fiscal year 2019.
Baskin-RobbinsDunkin’ International
Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2016 2015$ %2019 2018$ %
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$6,618
 6,261
 357
 5.7 %$23,027
 20,111
 2,916
 14.5%
Franchise fees939
 872
 67
 7.7 %3,302
 2,196
 1,106
 50.4%
Rental income458
 475
 (17) (3.6)%
Sales of ice cream and other products110,628
 109,047
 1,581
 1.4 %
Other revenues372
 421
 (49) (11.6)%419
 34
 385
 1,132.4%
Total revenues$119,015
 117,076
 1,939
 1.7 %$26,748
 22,341
 4,407
 19.7%
Segment profit$38,967
 36,218
 2,749
 7.6 %$18,065
 14,398
 3,667
 25.5%
The increase in Baskin-RobbinsDunkin’ International revenues increased $4.4 million for fiscal year 2016 was2019 due primarily to an increase in royalty income driven by systemwide sales growth and a recovery of ice cream and other products of $1.6 million due primarily to an increase in sales to the Middle East,prior period royalties, as well as an increase in royalty incomefranchise fees due primarily to additional deferred revenue recognized in the current fiscal year upon closure of $0.4 million.certain international markets, offset by additional franchisee incentives to support brand-building activities in certain international markets.
Baskin-Robbins

- 38-



Dunkin’ International segment profit increased $2.7$3.7 million for fiscal year 2016 due primarily to a decrease in general and administrative expenses driven by a reduction in bad debt expense, as well as increases in net income from our Japan joint venture and royalty income, offset by a decrease in net income of our South Korea joint venture. The increase in sales of ice cream products was offset by an increase in commodity costs.


- 40-



Fiscal year 2015 compared to fiscal year 2014
Consolidated results of operations
 Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Franchise fees and royalty income$513,222
 482,329
 30,893
 6.4 %
Rental income100,422
 97,663
 2,759
 2.8 %
Sales of ice cream and other products115,252
 117,484
 (2,232) (1.9)%
Sales at company-operated restaurants28,340
 22,206
 6,134
 27.6 %
Other revenues53,697
 29,027
 24,670
 85.0 %
Total revenues$810,933
 748,709
 62,224
 8.3 %
Total revenues increased $62.2 million, or 8.3%, in fiscal year 2015, driven by an increase in franchise fees and royalty income of $30.9 million, or 6.4%, primarily as a result of Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. systemwide sales growth and additional franchise fees due to favorable development mix and additional gross development, as well as an increase in other revenues of $24.7 million. The increase in other revenues was driven by licensing fees earned from the Dunkin’ K-Cup® pod licensing agreement and increased licensing fees earned from ice cream sales by our third-party ice cream manufacturer, as well as a settlement reached with a master licensee, which resulted in the recovery of prior period royalty income and franchise fees. Also contributing to the increase in revenues was an increase in sales at company-operated restaurants of $6.1 million driven by a net increase in the number of company-operated restaurants. An increase in rental income of $2.8 million, driven by increases in average rent per lease, sales-based rental income, and the number of leases was offset by a decline in sales of ice cream and other products of $2.2 million.
 Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Occupancy expenses – franchised restaurants$54,611
 53,395
 1,216
 2.3 %
Cost of ice cream and other products76,877
 83,129
 (6,252) (7.5)%
Company-operated restaurant expenses29,900
 22,687
 7,213
 31.8 %
General and administrative expenses, net243,796
 226,301
 17,495
 7.7 %
Depreciation and amortization45,244
 45,539
 (295) (0.6)%
Long-lived asset impairment charges623
 1,484
 (861) (58.0)%
Total operating costs and expenses$451,051
 432,535
 18,516
 4.3 %
Net income (loss) of equity method investments(41,745) 14,846
 (56,591) (381.2)%
Other operating income, net1,430
 7,838
 (6,408) (81.8)%
Operating income$319,567
 338,858
 (19,291) (5.7)%
Occupancy expenses for franchised restaurants for fiscal year 2015 increased $1.2 million, or 2.3%, from the prior fiscal year driven primarily by an increase in average rent per lease and an increase in sales-based rental expense.
Net margin on ice cream products increased for fiscal year 2015 to $38.4 million as a decrease in commodity costs, increase in pricing, and favorable foreign exchange rates more than offset the decrease in sales volume.
Company-operated restaurant expenses increased $7.2 million, or 31.8%, from the prior year primarily as a result of a net increase in the number of company-operated restaurants operating during the year.
General and administrative expenses increased $17.5 million, or 7.7%, in fiscal year 2015 due primarily to an increase in personnel costs driven by incremental incentive compensation accruals and an increase in share-based compensation. Also contributing to the increase in general and administrative expenses were costs incurred related to the final settlement of our Canadian pension plan as a result of the closure of our Canadian ice cream manufacturing plant in fiscal year 2012, as well as an increase in costs incurred to support our consumer packaged goods and international businesses.
Depreciation and amortization decreased $0.3 million in fiscal year 2015 resulting primarily from a decrease in amortization due to intangible assets becoming fully amortized and favorable lease intangible assets being written-off upon termination of the related leases, offset by an increase in depreciation due to the addition of depreciable assets.


- 41-



The decrease in long-lived asset impairment charges in fiscal year 2015 of $0.9 million was driven primarily by the timing of lease terminations, which resulted in the write-off of favorable lease intangible assets and leasehold improvements.
Net income (loss) of equity method investments decreased $56.6 million in fiscal year 2015 driven by an impairment of our investment in the Japan JV of $54.3 million. The Japan JV impairment resulted from an other-than-temporary decline in the value of our investment as a result of various factors including the continued declines in the operating performance of the joint venture and reduced future expectations of the Baskin-Robbins business in Japan, as well as an announced reconsideration of the amount of semi-annual dividend payments by the Japan JV in the fourth quarter (see note 6 to the consolidated financial statements included herein for further discussion). Also contributing to the decrease were unfavorable results from our Japan JV compared to the prior fiscal year and the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates on net income of our South Korea joint venture.
Other operating income, net includes gains recognized in connection with the sale of real estate and fluctuates based on the timing of such transactions. Additionally, other operating income, net of $7.8 million for fiscal year 2014 included a gain recognized in connection with the sale of the company-operated restaurants in the Atlanta market.
 Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Interest expense, net$96,341
 67,824
 28,517
 42.0 %
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions20,554
 13,735
 6,819
 49.6 %
Other losses, net1,084
 1,566
 (482) (30.8)%
Total other expense$117,979
 83,125
 34,854
 41.9 %
The increase in net interest expense for fiscal year 2015 of $28.5 million was driven primarily by the securitization refinancing transaction that occurred in January 2015, which resulted in additional borrowings and an increase in the weighted average interest rate, as well as an increase in amortization of capitalized debt issuance costs compared to the prior fiscal year.
The loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions for fiscal year 2015 of $20.6 million resulted from the January 2015 securitization refinancing transaction. The loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions for fiscal year 2014 of $13.7 million resulted from the February 2014 refinancing transaction.
The decrease in other losses, net, for fiscal year 2015 was driven primarily by foreign exchange losses due primarily to fluctuations in the U.S. dollar against the Australian dollar and the pound sterling.
 Fiscal year
 2015 2014
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Income before income taxes$201,588
 255,733
Provision for income taxes96,359
 80,170
Effective tax rate47.8% 31.3%
The increased effective tax rate for fiscal year 2015 resulted primarily from the impairment of our investment in the Japan JV, which reduced income before income taxes but for which there is no corresponding tax benefit. The impact of the impairment of our investment in the Japan JV was approximately 10% on the overall effective tax rate for fiscal year 2015.
The effective tax rate for fiscal year 2014 was lower than normal2019 primarily as a result of the net reversal of approximately $7.0 million of reserves for uncertain tax positions for which settlement with taxing authorities was reached during the year or were otherwise deemed effectively settled. Additionally, the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2014 reflects a net tax benefit of $8.5 million related to the restructuring of our Canadian subsidiaries, which included a legal entity conversion of Dunkin’ Brands Canada, Ltd. to a British Columbia unlimited liability company.


- 42-



Operating segments
Beginningincrease in fiscal year 2016, certain segment profit amounts in the tables below have been reclassified as a result of the realignment of our organizational structure to better support our segment operations, including the allocation of previously unallocated costs. Additionally, revenues and segment profit related to restaurants located in Puerto Rico were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility. Amounts in the tables below have been revised to reflect these changes for all years presented.
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.
 Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$413,692
 388,000
 25,692
 6.6%
Franchise fees42,503
 37,388
 5,115
 13.7%
Rental income96,827
 93,703
 3,124
 3.3%
Sales at company-operated restaurants28,340
 22,206
 6,134
 27.6%
Other revenues9,700
 7,574
 2,126
 28.1%
Total revenues$591,062
 548,871
 42,191
 7.7%
Segment profit$431,065
 404,657
 26,408
 6.5%
The increase in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. revenues for fiscal year 2015 was driven primarily by an increase in royalty income of $25.7 million as a result of an increase in systemwide sales, as well as an increase in sales at company-operated restaurants of $6.1 million due to a net increase in the number of company-operated restaurants operating during the year. Also contributing to revenue growth were increases in franchise fees of $5.1 million due to favorable development mix and additional gross development, rental income of $3.1 million driven primarily by increases in average rent per lease, sales-based rental income, and the number of leases, as well as an increase in other revenues of $2.1 million.
The increase in Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. segment profit for fiscal year 2015 was driven primarily by the increases in royalty income, franchise fees, and other revenues, as well as a reduction in bad debt expense. These increases in segment profit were offset by gains recognized in the prior fiscal year in connection with the sale of the company-operated restaurants in Atlanta and other real estate, as well as increases in personnel and travel costs in the current year.
Dunkin’ Donuts International
 Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$15,658
 15,209
 449
 3.0 %
Franchise fees5,017
 4,430
 587
 13.3 %
Rental income13
 110
 (97) (88.2)%
Other revenues2,285
 (56) 2,341
 n/m
Total revenues$22,973
 19,693
 3,280
 16.7 %
Segment profit$10,240
 9,478
 762
 8.0 %
The increase in Dunkin’ Donuts International revenues for fiscal year 2015 resulted primarily from an increase in other revenues of $2.3 million due primarily to a settlement reached with a master licensee resulting in the recovery of prior period royalty income and franchise fees, as well as increases in franchise fees of $0.6 million driven by development in new markets and royalty income of $0.4 million.
The increase in Dunkin’ Donuts International segment profit for fiscal year 2015 was driven primarily by revenue growth, offset by increases in general and administrative expenses, driven by increased personnel costs, investments in international markets, and bad debt, as well as a decrease in net incomeresults from our South Korea joint venture.


- 43-



Baskin-Robbins U.S.
 Fiscal  year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$28,348
 27,015
 1,333
 4.9 %
Franchise fees871
 935
 (64) (6.8)%
Rental income2,989
 3,250
 (261) (8.0)%
Sales of ice cream and other products4,014
 6,725
 (2,711) (40.3)%
Other revenues10,918
 7,940
 2,978
 37.5 %
Total revenues$47,140
 45,865
 1,275
 2.8 %
Segment profit$29,289
 28,357
 932
 3.3 %
The increase in Baskin-Robbins U.S. revenues for fiscalventure compared to the prior year, 2015 was due primarily to an increase in other revenues of $3.0 million, drivenoffset by an increase in licensing income, and an increase in royalty income of $1.3 million due to an increase in systemwide sales, offset by a decrease in sales of ice cream and other products of $2.7 million. The fluctuations in licensing income and sales of ice cream and other products can be attributed to a shift in certain franchisees now purchasing ice cream directly from our third-party ice cream manufacturer.
Baskin-Robbins U.S. segment profit for fiscal year 2015 increased primarily as a result of the increases in other revenues and royalty income, offset by increases in general and administrative expenses due primarily to expenses incurred related to brand-building activities and increased personnel costs.an increase in bad debt expense.
Baskin-Robbins International
U.S.
Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2015 2014$ %2019 2018$ %
(In thousands, except percentages)(In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$6,261
 7,850
 (1,589) (20.2)%$29,386
 29,375
 11
 0.0 %
Franchise fees872
 1,502
 (630) (41.9)%1,403
 1,276
 127
 10.0 %
Rental income475
 516
 (41) (7.9)%3,564
 2,971
 593
 20.0 %
Sales of ice cream and other products109,047
 109,448
 (401) (0.4)%3,543
 3,261
 282
 8.6 %
Other revenues421
 433
 (12) (2.8)%10,235
 10,535
 (300) (2.8)%
Total revenues$117,076
 119,749
 (2,673) (2.2)%$48,131
 47,418
 713
 1.5 %
Segment profit$36,218
 38,968
 (2,750) (7.1)%$29,932
 31,958
 (2,026) (6.3)%
The decrease in Baskin-Robbins InternationalU.S. revenues increased for fiscal year 2015 was2019 due primarily to decreases of $1.6 millionincreases in royaltyrental income, which was driven by a decrease in royalty income earned on ice cream sales in Russia and the negative impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates, $0.6 million of franchise fees, and $0.4 million of sales of ice cream and other products, dueand franchise fees, offset by a decrease in other revenues driven by a decrease in licensing income. The increase in rental income resulted primarily from the adoption of the new lease accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. See note 2(v) to a decline in sales to Australia.the consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of the impact of the new guidance.
Baskin-Robbins InternationalU.S. segment profit decreased $2.8$2.0 million for fiscal year 2015 due2019 primarily to the decreases in royalty income and franchise fees, andas a result of an increase in general and administrative expenses driven primarily by an increase in costs incurred in fiscal year 2019 to support brand-building activities and an increase in bad debt expense. Also contributing toexpense, as well as the decrease in segment profit were unfavorable results from our Japan JV compared toother revenues, offset by the priorincrease in franchise fees.
Baskin-Robbins International
 Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2019 2018$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Royalty income$7,658
 7,532
 126
 1.7 %
Franchise fees1,194
 844
 350
 41.5 %
Rental income880
 529
 351
 66.4 %
Sales of ice cream and other products102,696
 106,284
 (3,588) (3.4)%
Other revenues(52) 178
 (230) (129.2)%
Total revenues$112,376
 115,367
 (2,991) (2.6)%
Segment profit$40,077
 36,189
 3,888
 10.7 %
Baskin-Robbins International revenues decreased $3.0 million for fiscal year 2019 due primarily to decreases in sales of ice cream and other products and other revenues, offset by increases in rental income and franchise fees. The increase in rental income resulted primarily from the adoption of the new lease accounting standard in the first quarter of fiscal year 2019. See note 2(v) of the consolidated financial statements for further disclosure of the impact of unfavorable foreign exchange rates onthe new guidance.
Baskin-Robbins International segment profit increased $3.9 million for fiscal year 2019 due primarily to an increase in net income offrom our South Korea and Japan joint venture. Theseventures and a decrease in general and administrative expenses. The decrease in general and administrative expense resulted primarily from decreases in segment profit wereconsulting fees and personnel costs, offset by an increase in net margin on ice cream. A decrease in commodity costs,advertising expenses.


- 39-



U.S Advertising Funds
 Fiscal year Increase (Decrease)
2019 2018$ %
 (In thousands, except percentages)
Advertising fees and related income$473,644
 454,608
 19,036
 4.2%
Total revenues$473,644
 454,608
 19,036
 4.2%
Segment profit$
 
 
 %
The increase in pricing, and favorable foreign exchange rates more than offsetU.S. Advertising Funds revenues for fiscal year 2019 was due primarily to Dunkin’ U.S. systemwide sales growth. Expenses for the decreaseU.S. Advertising Funds were equivalent to revenues in sales volume,each period, resulting in an increase in net ice cream margin.no segment profit.
Liquidity and capital resources
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we held $361.4$621.2 million of cash and cash equivalents and $69.7$85.6 million of short-term restricted cash that was restricted under our securitized financing facility. Included in cash and cash equivalents is $177.9$242.2 million of cash held for advertising funds and reserved for gift card/certificate programs. Cash reserved for gift card/certificate programs also includes cash that will be used to fund initiatives from the gift card breakage liabilities (see note 10 to the consolidated


- 44-



financial statements included herein). In addition, as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we had a borrowing capacity of $74.1$116.9 million under our $100.0$150.0 million 2019 Variable Funding Notes (as defined below).
Operating, investing, and financing cash flows
Fiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2018
Net cash provided by operating activities was $276.2$297.7 million during fiscal year 2016,2019, as compared to $185.6$269.0 million in fiscal year 2015.2018. The $90.6$28.8 million increase in operating cash flows was driven primarily by an increase in pre-tax net income related to operating activities, excluding non-cash items, the fluctuation of restrictedas well as decreases in incentive compensation payments and cash of $67.8 million drivenpaid for interest on our long-term debt, offset by the initial funding of restricted cash accounts in accordance with the requirements of our securitized debt structure in the prior fiscal year, favorableunfavorable cash flows related to our gift card program due primarily to the timing of holidays and our fiscal year end, as well as the timing of receipts and payments related to the sale of Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods and the related franchisee profit-sharing program. Offsetting these increasesa decrease in operating cash flows were payments maderesulting from other changes in connection with the settlement of the Bertico litigation and increases in incentive compensation payments and cash paid for income taxes.working capital.
Net cash provided by investing activities was $1.3 million during fiscal year 2016, as compared to net cash used in investing activities ofwas $35.5 million during fiscal year 2019, as compared to $51.8 million in fiscal year 2015.2018. The $36.8$16.3 million increasedecrease in investing cash flowsoutflows was driven primarily by a reduction ofdecrease in capital expenditures of $15.1 million, an increasedue primarily to higher investments in proceeds received fromtechnology infrastructure to support the sale of real estate and company-operated restaurants of $17.8 million, as well as cash paidDunkin' U.S. Blueprint for the acquisition of a company-operated restaurantGrowth in the prior fiscal year period.year.
Net cash used in financing activities was $176.3$152.6 million during fiscal year 2016,2019, as compared to $96.9$732.4 million in fiscal year 2015.2018. The $79.5$579.7 million increase in net cash useddecrease in financing activitiescash outflows was driven primarily by the favorable impact of debt-related activities of $614.1 million in the prior fiscal year, resulting from proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, net of debt repayment, payment of debt issuance and other debt-related costs, and funding of restricted cash accounts, as well as the repayment of debt in the current fiscal year of $25.0 million. Also contributing to the increase in net cash used in financing activities were additional dividends paid on common stock of $9.2 million in fiscal year 2016 compared to fiscal year 2015, as well as a reduction of excess tax benefits from share-based compensation of $8.8 million. Offsetting the unfavorable impact of debt-related activities was incremental cash used in the prior fiscal year for repurchases of common stock of $570.0$650.7 million, as well as the favorable impact of cash used in debt-related activities of $6.6 million compared to the prior fiscal year. Offsetting these decreases in financing cash outflows was incremental cash generated from the exercise of stock options in the prior year period of $64.6 million, as well as an increase in cash used to pay quarterly dividends on common stock of $9.3 million, and cash used to settle tax withholding obligations upon vesting of certain equity awards of $3.7 million. The favorable impact of cash used in debt-related activities was driven by proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt, net of debt repayment and payment of debt issuance and other debt-related costs.
FreeAdjusted operating and investing cash flow
DuringFiscal year 2019 compared to fiscal year 2016, net cash provided by operating activities was $276.2 million, as compared to $185.6 million for fiscal year 2015. 2018
Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal years 20162019 and 2015 includes2018 included net cash inflows of $29.4$34.9 million and $12.3$31.6 million, respectively, related to advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs. Net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2015 includes the net funding of restricted cash accounts of $65.7 million, which represents cash restricted in accordance with our securitized financing facility and will be used for operating activities such as to pay interest and real estate obligations, while net cash provided by operating activities for fiscal year 2016 includes the net release of restricted cash of $2.1 million. Excluding cash held for advertising funds and reserved for gift card/certificate programs, and excluding the fluctuation in restricted cash, we generated $246.1$227.3 million and $203.4$185.5 million of freeadjusted operating and investing cash flow during fiscal years 20162019 and 2015,2018, respectively.
The increase in freeadjusted operating and investing cash flow from fiscal year 20152018 to 20162019 was due primarily to an increase in pre-tax net income related to operating activities, excluding non-cash items, the timing of receipts and payments related to the sale of Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods and the related franchisee profit-sharing program, an increase in proceeds from the sale of real estate and company-operated restaurants, and a reductiondecrease in capital expenditures, compared toand the prior fiscal year. Offsetting these increases in free cash flow were payments made in connection with the settlement of the Bertico litigation and increasesdecreases in incentive compensation payments and cash paid for income taxes.interest on our long-term debt, offset by other changes in working capital.
FreeAdjusted operating and investing cash flow is a non-GAAP measure reflecting net cash provided by operating and investing activities, excluding the cash flows related to advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs, and restricted cash.programs. We use freeadjusted operating and investing cash flow as a key performanceliquidity measure for the purpose of evaluating performance internally and our ability to generate cash. We also believe freeadjusted operating and investing cash flow provides our investors with useful information regarding our historical cash flow results. This non-GAAP measurement is not intended to replace the presentation of our financial results in accordance with GAAP.


- 40-



GAAP, and adjusted operating and investing cash flow does not represent residual cash flows available for discretionary expenditures. Use of the term freeadjusted operating and investing cash flow may differ from similar measures reported by other companies.


- 45-



FreeAdjusted operating and investing cash flow is reconciled from net cash provided by operating activities determined under GAAP as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal year
 2016 2015
Net cash provided by operating activities$276,205
 185,566
Less: Increase in cash held for advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs(29,366) (12,335)
Plus: Increase (decrease) in restricted cash(2,113) 65,673
Plus: Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities1,343
 (35,467)
Free cash flow, excluding cash held for advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs$246,069
 203,437
 Fiscal year
 2019 2018
Net cash provided by operating activities$297,734
 268,955
Less: Increase in cash held for advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs(34,910) (31,583)
Less: Net cash used in investing activities(35,492) (51,835)
Adjusted operating and investing cash flow$227,332
 185,537
Borrowing capacity
OurAs of December 28, 2019, our securitized financing facility included original aggregate borrowings of approximately $2.60$1.40 billion, consisting of $2.50$1.70 billion, and $150.0 million related to the 2017 Class A-2 Notes (as defined below), 2019 Class A-2 Notes (as defined below), and $100.0 million ofthe 2019 Variable Funding Notes (as defined below) which were undrawn at closing., respectively. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there was approximately $2.46$3.06 billion of total principal outstanding on the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Class A-2 Notes, while there was $74.1$116.9 million in available commitments under the 2019 Variable Funding Notes as $25.9$33.1 million of letters of credit were outstanding.
On January 26, 2015,In April 2019, DB Master Finance LLC (the “Master Issuer”), a limited-purpose, bankruptcy-remote, wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. (“DBGI”), entered into a base indenture and a related supplemental indenture (collectively, the “Indenture”) under which the Master Issuer may issue multiple series of notes. On the same date, the Master Issuer issued Series 2015-1 3.262%2019-1 3.787% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “Class“2019 Class A-2-I Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $750.0$600.0 million, Series 2019-1 4.021% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “2019 Class A-2-II Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $400.0 million, and Series 2019-1 4.352% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-III (the “2019 Class A-2-III Notes”, and together with the 2019 Class A-2-I Notes and 2019 Class A-2-II Notes, the “2019 Class A-2 Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $700.0 million. In addition, the Master Issuer issued Series 2019-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes, Class A-1 (the “2019 Variable Funding Notes” and, together with the 2019 Class A-2 Notes, the “2019 Notes”), which allow for the issuance of up to $150.0 million of 2019 Variable Funding Notes and certain other credit instruments, including letters of credit.
The proceeds received from the issuance of the 2019 Notes were used to repay the remaining $1.68 billion outstanding on the Series 2015-1 3.980% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “Class“2015 Class A-2-II Notes”) and togetherto pay related transaction fees and expenses. In connection with the Class A-2-Iissuance of the 2019 Variable Funding Notes, the “Class A-2 Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $1.75 billion. In addition, the Master Issuer also issuedterminated the commitments with respect to its existing Series 2015-12017-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes, Class A-1 (the “Variable“2017 Variable Funding Notes”).
The 2017 Notes and together with the Class A-22019 Notes the “Notes”), which allow the Master Issuer to borrow up to $100.0 million on a revolving basis. The Variable Funding Notes may also be used to issue letters of credit. The Notes were each issued in a securitization transaction pursuant to which most of the Company’s domestic and certain of its foreign revenue-generating assets, consisting principally of franchise-related agreements, real estate assets, and intellectual property and license agreements for the use of intellectual property, are held by the Master Issuer and certain other limited-purpose, bankruptcy-remote, wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries of the Company that act as guarantors of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes and that have pledged substantially all of their assets to secure the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes.
The 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes were issued pursuant to a base indenture and related supplemental indentures (collectively, the “Indenture”) under which the Master Issuer may issue multiple series of notes. The legal final maturity date of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Class A-2 Notes is in February 2045,November 2047 and May 2049, respectively, but it is anticipated that, unless earlier prepaid to the extent permitted under the Indenture, the Series 2017-1 3.629% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “2017 Class A-2-I Notes”) will be repaid by November 2024, the Series 2017-1 4.030% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “2017 Class A-2-II Notes” and, together with the 2017 Class A-2-I Notes, the “2017 Class A-2 Notes”) will be repaid by November 2027, the 2019 Class A-2-I Notes will be repaid inby February 2024, the 2019 and the Class A-2-II Notes will be repaid in February 2022by May 2026, and the 2019 Class A-2-III Notes will be repaid by May 2029 (the “Anticipated Repayment Dates”). Principal amortization repayments,payments equal to $31 million per calendar year, payable quarterly, are collectively required to be made on the 2017 Class A-2-I NotesA-2 and 2019 Class A-2-II Notes equal to $7.5 million and $17.5 million, respectively, per calendar yearA-2 through the respective Anticipated Repayment Dates. No principal payments will beare required if a specified leverage ratio, which is a measure of outstanding debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted for certain items (as specified in the Indenture), is less than or equal to 5.0 to 1.0, though the Company intends to continue to make the scheduled principal payments. If the 2017 Class A-2 Notes or the 2019 Class A-2 Notes have not been repaid in fullor refinanced by their respective Anticipated Repayment Dates, a rapid amortization event will occur in which


- 41-



residual net cash flows of the Master Issuer, after making certain required payments, will be applied to the outstanding principal of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and the 2019 Class A-2 Notes. Various other events, including failure to maintain a minimum ratio of net cash flows to debt service (“DSCR”), may also cause a rapid amortization event.
It is anticipated that the principal and interest on the 2019 Variable Funding Notes will be repaid in full on or prior to February 2020,August 2024, subject to two additional one-year extensions. Borrowings under the 2019 Variable Funding Notes bear interest at a rate equal to a LIBOR rate plus 1.50%, or the lenders' commercial paper funding rate plus 1.50%. If the 2019 Variable Funding Notes are not repaid prior to August 2024 or prior to the end of the extension period, if applicable, incremental interest will accrue. In addition, the Company is required to pay a 1.50% fee for letters of credit amounts outstanding and a commitment fee on the unused portion of the 2019 Variable Funding Notes which ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% based on utilization. Other events and transactions, such as certain asset sales and receipt of various insurance or indemnification proceeds, may trigger additional mandatory prepayments.
In order to assess our current debt levels, including servicing our long-term debt, and our ability to take on additional borrowings, we monitor a leverage ratio of our long-term debt, net of cash (“Net Debt”), to adjusted earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization (“Adjusted EBITDA”). This leverage ratio, and the related Net Debt and Adjusted EBITDA measures used to compute it, are non-GAAP measures, and our use of the terms Net Debt and Adjusted EBITDA may vary from other companies, including those in our industry, due to the potential inconsistencies in the method of calculation and differences due to items subject to interpretation. Net Debt reflects the gross principal amount outstanding under our securitized financing facility, notes payable, and capitalfinance lease obligations, less short-term cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, excluding cash reserved for gift card/certificate programs. Adjusted EBITDA is defined in our securitized financing facility as net income before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, and impairment charges, as adjusted for certain items that are summarized in the table below. Net Debt should not be considered as an alternative to debt, total liabilities, or any other obligations derived in accordance with GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income, or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP, as a measure of operating performance, or as an alternative


- 46-



to cash flows as a measure of liquidity. Net Debt, Adjusted EBITDA, and the related leverage ratio have important limitations as analytical tools and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. However, we believe that presenting Net Debt, Adjusted EBITDA, and the related leverage ratio are appropriate to provide additional information to investors to demonstrate our current debt levels and ability to take on additional borrowings.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we had a Net Debt to Adjusted EBITDA ratio of 4.64.8 to 1.0. The following is a reconciliation of our Net Debt and Adjusted EBITDA to the corresponding GAAP measures as of and for the fiscal year endingended December 31, 2016,28, 2019, respectively (in thousands):
December 31, 2016December 28, 2019
Principal outstanding under Class A-2 Notes$2,456,250
Total capital lease obligations8,139
Principal outstanding under 2017 Class A-2 Notes$1,372,000
Principal outstanding under 2019 Class A-2 Notes1,691,500
Other notes payable1,250
Total finance lease obligations7,739
Less: cash and cash equivalents(361,425)(621,152)
Less: restricted cash, current(69,746)(85,644)
Plus: cash held for gift card/certificate programs171,749
185,462
Net Debt$2,204,967
$2,551,155


- 42-



Fiscal year
2016
Fiscal year
2019
Net income$195,576
$242,024
Interest expense100,852
128,411
Income tax expense117,673
77,238
Depreciation and amortization42,537
Depreciation and amortization(a)
36,883
Impairment charges149
551
EBITDA456,787
485,107
Adjustments:  
Share based compensation expense17,181
Other(a)
1,538
Share-based compensation expense(a)
12,961
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions13,076
Decrease in deferred revenue related to franchise and licensing agreements(b)
(1,774)
Other(c)
23,237
Total adjustments18,719
47,500
Adjusted EBITDA$475,506
$532,607
(a)Amounts exclude depreciation and share-based compensation of $5.5 million and $1.1 million, respectively, related to U.S. Advertising Funds.
(b)Amount excludes incentives paid to franchisees, primarily related to the Dunkin’ U.S. Blueprint for Growth.
(c)Represents costs and fees associated with various franchisee-related investments, including investments in the Dunkin’ U.S. Blueprint for Growth, bank fees, legal reserves, the allocation of share-based compensation expense to the advertising funds, and other non-cash gains and losses.
Based upon our current level of operations and anticipated growth, we believe that the cash generated from our operations and amounts available under our 2019 Variable Funding Notes will be adequate to meet our anticipated debt service requirements, capital expenditures, and working capital needs for at least the next twelve months. We believe that we will be able to meet these obligations even if we experience no growth in sales or profits. There can be no assurance, however, that our business will generate sufficient cash flows from operations or that future borrowings will be available under our 2019 Variable Funding Notes or otherwise to enable us to service our indebtedness, including our securitized financing facility, or to make anticipated capital expenditures. Our future operating performance and our ability to service, extend, or refinance the securitized financing facility will be subject to future economic conditions and to financial, business, and other factors, many of which are beyond our control.
Off balance sheet obligations
In limited instances, we issue guarantees to financial institutions so that our franchisees can obtain financing for various business purposes. We monitor the financial condition of our franchisees and record provisions for estimated losses on guaranteed liabilities of our franchisees if we believe that our franchisees are unable to make their required payments. As of December 31, 2016, if all of our outstanding guarantees of third-party franchisee financing obligations came due simultaneously, we would be liable for approximately $1.5 million. As of December 31, 2016, there were no amounts under such guarantees that were due. We generally have cross-default provisions with these franchisees that would put the franchisee in default of its franchise agreement in the event of non-payment under such loans. We believe these cross-default provisions significantly reduce the risk that we would not be able to recover the amount of required payments under these guarantees and, historically, we have not incurred significant losses under these guarantees due to defaults by our franchisees.


- 47-



We have entered into various supply chain contracts that provide for purchase commitments or exclusivity,agreements with suppliers of franchisee products, the majority of which result in us being contingently liable upon early terminationcontain guarantees by the Company related to franchisees' purchases of certain volumes of products over specified periods. Our guarantees decrease as franchisees purchase products over the respective terms of the agreementagreements. The guarantees have varying terms, many of which are one year or engaging with another supplier.less, and the latest of which expires in 2022. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we were contingently liable under such supply chain agreements for approximately $136.2 million.$100.9 million. We assess the risk of performing under each of these guarantees on a quarterly basis, and, based on various factors including internal forecasts, prior history, and ability to extend contract terms, we have determined no materialaccrued an inconsequential amount of reserves are necessary related to these commitmentssupply chain guarantees as of December 31, 2016.
As a result of assigning our interest in obligations under property leases as a condition of the refranchising of certain restaurants and the guarantee of certain other leases, we are contingently liable on certain lease agreements. These leases have varying terms, the latest of which expires in 2024. As of December 31, 2016, the potential amount of undiscounted payments we could be required to make in the event of nonpayment by the primary lessee was $4.0 million. Our franchisees are the primary lessees under the majority of these leases. We generally have cross-default provisions with these franchisees that would put them in default of their franchise agreement in the event of nonpayment under the lease. We believe these cross-default provisions significantly reduce the risk that we will be required to make payments under these leases, and we have not recorded a liability for such contingent liabilities.28, 2019.
Contractual obligations
The following table sets forth our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016:28, 2019:
(In millions)Total 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3
years
 
3-5
years
 
More than
5 years
Total 
Less than
1 year
 
1-3
years
 
3-5
years
 
More than
5 years
Long-term debt(1)
$2,863.5
 118.3
 930.5
 166.6
 1,648.1
$3,888.2
 154.0
 304.3
 1,407.7
 2,022.2
Capital lease obligations18.7
 1.6
 3.0
 2.5
 11.6
Finance lease obligations18.2
 1.6
 3.2
 3.0
 10.4
Operating lease obligations668.0
 57.7
 114.0
 101.8
 394.5
559.1
 53.6
 109.3
 92.2
 304.0
Short and long-term obligations(2)
0.8
 0.8
 
 
 
4.1
 4.1
 
 
 
Total(3)(4)(5)
$3,551.0
 178.4
 1,047.5
 270.9
 2,054.2
$4,469.6
 213.3
 416.8
 1,502.9
 2,336.6
(1)Amounts include scheduled principal payments on long-term debt, as well as estimated interest of $93.3$122.9 million, $166.1$242.0 million, $131.6$220.4 million, and $16.2$238.2 million for less than 1 year, 1-3 years, 3-5 years, and more than 5 years, respectively. Amounts due under the Indenture are reflected through the anticipated repayment datesAnticipated Repayment Dates as described further above in “Liquidity and capital resources.”


- 43-



(2)
Amounts include obligations to former employees under severance agreements. Excluded from these amounts are any payments that may be required related to pending litigation, as more fully described in note 17(d)16(d) to our consolidated financial statements, included herein, as the amount and timing of cash requirements, if any, are uncertain. Additionally, liabilities to employees and former employees under deferred compensation arrangements totaling $11.1$7.2 million are excluded from the table above, as timing of payment is uncertain.
(3)
We have entered into various supply chain contracts that provide for purchase commitments or exclusivity,agreements with suppliers of franchisee products, the majority of which result in our being contingently liable upon early terminationcontain guarantees by the Company related to franchisees' purchases of the agreement or engaging with another supplier.certain volumes of products over specified periods. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we were contingently liable under such supply chain agreements for approximately $136.2100.9 million, and, consideringbased on various factors including internal forecasts, prior history, and ability to extend contract terms, no material accrual was requiredwe accrued an inconsequential amount of reserves related to these supply chain commitments. commitments as of December 28, 2019, which are discussed further above in “Off balance sheet obligations.”Such amounts are not included in the table above as timing of payment, if any, is uncertain.
(4)
We are guarantors of and are contingently liable for certain lease arrangements primarily as the result of our assigning our interest. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we were contingently liable for $4.02.1 million under these guarantees, which are discussed further above in “Off balance sheet obligations.”guarantees. Additionally, in certain cases, we issue guarantees to financial institutions so that franchisees can obtain financing. If all outstanding guarantees came due as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we would be liable for approximately $1.5 million. Such amounts are not included in the table above as timing of payment, if any, is uncertain.
(5)
Income tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions and gift card/certificate liabilities and liabilities to various advertising funds are excluded from the table above as we are not able to make a reasonably reliable estimate of the amount and period of related future payments. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we had a liability for uncertain tax positions, including accrued interest and penalties thereon, of $3.4$2.1 million. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, we had a gift card/certificate liability of $207.6$248.1 million and a gift card breakage liability of $13.3$0.7 million (see note 2(u)2(n) of the notes to ourthe consolidated financial statements included herein)statements). As of December 31, 2016, we had a net payable of $11.9 million to various advertising funds.


- 48-



Critical accounting policies
Our significant accounting policies are more fully described under the heading “Summary of significant accounting policies” in Notenote 2 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements. However, we believe the accounting policies described below are particularly important to the portrayal and understanding of our financial position and results of operations and require application of significant judgment by our management. In applying these policies, management uses its judgment in making certain assumptions and estimates.
These judgments involve estimations of the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may have a significant impact on our quarterly and annual results of operations or financial condition. Changes in estimates and judgments could significantly affect our result of operations, financial condition, and cash flow in future years. The following is a description of what we consider to be our most significant critical accounting policies.
Lease accounting
In fiscal year 2019, we adopted new guidance for lease accounting and elected the option to not restate comparative periods in the year of adoption, including amounts as of December 29, 2018 and for fiscal years 2018 and 2017. Under the new guidance, we determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception or modification of a contract and classify each lease as either an operating or finance lease at commencement, resulting in the recognition of lease assets and liabilities for the majority of our leases. Finance and operating lease assets represent our right to use an underlying asset as lessee for the lease term, and lease obligations represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. These assets and obligations are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments, net of incentives, over the lease term.
Significant judgment is required in determining our incremental borrowing rate and the expected lease term, both of which impact the determination of lease classification and the present value of lease payments. Generally, our lease contracts do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate and, therefore, we use an estimated incremental borrowing rate as of the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The estimated incremental borrowing rate reflects considerations such as market rates for our outstanding collateralized debt, interpolations of rates for leases with terms that differ from our outstanding debt, and market rates for debt of companies with similar credit ratings. Our lease terms, as both lessee and lessor, include option periods to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that those options will be exercised, which are generally through the end of the related franchise agreement term. Given the significant operating lease assets and liabilities recorded, changes in the estimates made by management or the underlying assumptions could have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.


- 44-



Revenue recognition
Initial franchise fee revenueRevenue is recognized upon substantial completionin accordance with a five-step revenue model, as follows: identifying the contract with the customer; identifying the performance obligations in the contract; determining the transaction price; allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations; and recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
In applying this five-step model, we have made significant judgments in identifying the promised goods or services in our contracts with franchisees and licensees that are distinct and which represent separate performance obligations. Generally, we have determined that the franchise license granted for each individual restaurant within an arrangement represents a single performance obligation. Therefore, all consideration within the contract is allocated to each individual restaurant, including initial franchise fees, market entry fees, royalty income, continuing advertising fees, franchisee incentives, renewal income, and transfer fees. Additionally, for certain Baskin-Robbins international markets, we have determined that a performance obligation exists related to the distribution of ice cream and other products, which is separate from the franchise license. Therefore, a portion of the services requiredconsideration from the sales of us as stated inice cream and other products is allocated to the franchise agreement, whichlicense for those Baskin-Robbins international markets that do not pay a royalty. Similar judgments are made in identifying separate performance obligations for other contracts with customers, including licensing arrangements with third-parties.
Gift card breakage
While franchisees continue to honor all gift cards presented for payment, the likelihood of redemption may be determined to be remote for certain cards due to long periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, we may recognize revenue from unredeemed gift cards (“breakage”) if they are not subject to unclaimed property laws.
Significant judgment is generally upon openingrequired in determining whether to recognize breakage revenue over time or when the likelihood of the respective restaurant. Fees collected in advance are deferred until earned. Royalty income is based on a percentage of franchisee gross sales andredemption becomes remote for specific gift cards. Breakage is recognized when earned, which occursthe likelihood of redemption becomes remote for gift cards that we do not expect to be entitled to breakage at the franchisees’ pointtime of sale. Renewal feesGift cards enrolled in our loyalty program are recognized whenexpected to be redeemed, reloaded, and reused multiple times, and therefore we do not expect to be entitled to breakage at the time of sale for these loyalty gift cards. Similarly, gift cards not enrolled in the loyalty program but that have been frequently redeemed and reloaded are expected to be redeemed in a renewal agreement with a franchisee becomes effective. Rental income for base rentals is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term. Contingent rent is recognized as earned, and any amounts received from lessees in advance of achieving stipulated thresholds are deferred until such threshold is actually achieved. Revenue from the sale of ice cream is recognized when title and risk of loss transferssimilar manner to the buyer, whichloyalty gift cards. Therefore, for loyalty and other heavily reloaded gift cards, breakage is generally upon delivery. Licensing fees areestimated and recognized when earned, which is generally upon sale of the underlying products by the licensees. Retail store revenues at company-operated restaurants are recognized when payment is tendered at the point in time when the likelihood of redemption of any remaining card balance becomes remote, generally after a period of sufficient inactivity.
For all other gift cards, we expect to be entitled to breakage at the time of sale, net of sales tax and other sales-related taxes. Gainstherefore estimate and recognize breakage over time in proportion to actual gift card redemptions. Significant judgment is required in estimating breakage rates on these gift cards. In estimating breakage rates, we analyze and monitor trends in historical redemption rates over time, including at various points in the refranchise or salelife of a restaurant are recognized whengift card. We have a significant volume of gift card activity, which provides sufficient historical data to reasonably estimate breakage rates. However, given the sale transaction closes, the franchisee hassignificant dollar value of gift cards outstanding, changes in estimated breakage rates could have a minimum amount of the purchase price in at risk equity, and we are satisfied that the buyer can meet its financial obligations to us.
Our revenue recognition policies will be impacted by new guidance for revenue recognition beginning in fiscal year 2018. See “Recently Issued Accounting Standards” below for further discussion.material impact on our outstanding gift card liability.
Impairment of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets
Goodwill and trade names (“indefinite-lived intangibles”) have been assigned to our reporting units, which are also our operating segments, for purposes of impairment testing. All of ourOur Dunkin’ U.S., Dunkin’ International, Baskin-Robbins U.S. and Baskin-Robbins International reporting units have indefinite-lived intangibles associated with them.
We evaluate the remaining useful life of our trade names to determine whether current events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. In addition, all of our indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that a trade name is impaired. impaired and to determine if the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not greater than the carrying amount for goodwill. The qualitative factors considered include, but are not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, cost factors, overall financial performance, entity-specific events, and legal factors. Assessing overall financial performance requires management to make assumptions and to apply judgment when estimating future cash flows, including projected revenue growth, operating expenses, and restaurant development. These estimates are highly subjective, and our ability to realize the future cash flows is affected by factors such as the success of our strategic initiatives, economic conditions, operating performance, competition, and consumer and demographic trends. If the estimates or underlying assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges.
In the event we were to determine that the carrying value of a trade name would more likely than not exceed its fair value quantitative testing would be performed. Quantitative testing consists of a comparison of the fair value of each trade name with its carrying value, with any excess of carrying value over fair value being recognized as an impairment loss. For goodwill, we first perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not greater than the carrying amount. In the event we were to determineor that a reporting unit’s carrying value would more likely than not exceed its fair value, quantitative testing would be performed which consists of a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. The fair value of a reporting unit is an estimate of the amount for which the unit as a whole could be sold in a current transaction between willing parties. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill is written down to its implied fair value.performed. We have selected the first day of our fiscal third quarter as the date on which to perform our annual impairment test for all indefinite-lived intangible assets. We also test for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of


- 45-



such indefinite-lived intangibles has been impaired. We determined that it was more likely than not that the fair valuesvalue of allour reporting units with goodwill balancesand trade names were substantially in excess ofgreater than their respective carrying valuesamounts as of the most recent goodwill testingqualitative analysis date. No impairment of indefinite-lived intangible assets was recorded during fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, or 2014.
We have intangible assets other than goodwill and trade names that are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives or terms of their related agreements. Other intangible assets consist primarily of franchise and international license rights (“franchise rights”), ice cream distribution and territorial franchise agreement license rights (“license rights”), and operating lease interests acquired related to our prime leases and subleases (“operating leases acquired”). Franchise rights, license rights, and operating leases acquired recorded in the consolidated balance sheets were valued using an appropriate valuation method during the period of acquisition. Amortization of franchise rights, license rights, and favorable operating leases acquired is recorded as amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations and amortized over the


- 49-



respective franchise, license, and lease terms using the straight-line method. Unfavorable operating leases acquired related to our prime leases and subleases are recorded in the liability section of the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized into rental expense and rental income, respectively, over the base lease term of the respective leases using the straight-line method. Our amortizable intangible assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the intangible asset may not be recoverable. An intangible asset that is deemed impaired is written down to its estimated fair value, which is based on discounted cash flows.2017.
Income taxes
Our major tax jurisdictionsjurisdiction subject to income tax areis the U.S. and Canada. The majority of our U.S. legal entities are limited liability companies (“LLCs”), which are single member entities that are treated as disregarded entities and included as part of DBGI in aour consolidated federal income tax return. We also have subsidiaries in multiple foreign jurisdictions that file separate tax returns in their respective countries and local jurisdictions, as required. Additionally, we haveOn December 22, 2017, the U.S. federal government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act requires a U.S. shareholder of a foreign subsidiary locatedcorporation to include global intangible low-taxed income ("GILTI") in Dubai withintaxable income resulting in an incremental tax on foreign income. Our accounting policy is to record any tax on GILTI in the United Arab Emirates,provision for which no income tax returntaxes in the year it is required to be filed. The current income tax liabilities for our foreign subsidiaries are calculated on a stand-alone basis. The current federal tax liability for each entity included in our consolidated federal income tax return is calculated on a stand-alone basis, including foreign taxes, for which a separate company foreign tax credit is calculated in lieu of a deduction for foreign withholding taxes paid. As a matter of course, we are regularly audited by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities.incurred.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of items that have been included in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the respective tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that are expected to apply in years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effects of changes in tax raterates and changes in apportionment of income between tax jurisdictions on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the year in which the law is enacted or change in apportionment occurs. Judgment is required in determining the effects of changes in tax rates and changes in apportionment of income, and such judgments could have a significant impact on our financial statements considering the materiality of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. Valuation allowances are provided when we do not believe it is more likely than not that we will realize the benefit of identified tax assets.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment, which requires significant judgment. In projecting future taxable income, we consider historical results and incorporate assumptions about the amount of future federal, state, and foreign income, considering items that do not have tax consequences. The estimation of future taxable income and our resulting ability to utilize deferred tax assets can significantly change based on future events.
We are subject to audit by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities. A tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return is recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Estimates of interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment.
Legal contingencies
We are engaged in litigation that arises in the ordinary course of business as a franchisor. Such matters typically include disputes related to compliance with the terms of franchise and development agreements, including claims or threats of claims of breach of contract, negligence, and other alleged violations by us. We record reserves for legal contingencies when information available to us indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Predicting the outcomes of claims and litigation and estimating the related costs and exposures involve substantial uncertainties that could cause actual costs to vary materially from estimates. Legal costs incurred in connection with legal and other contingencies are expensed as the costs are incurred.
Allowances for franchise, license, and lease receivables
We reserve all or a portion of a franchisee’s receivable balance when deemed necessary based upon detailed review of such balances, and apply a pre-defined reserve percentage based on an aging criteria to other balances. We perform our reserve analysis during each fiscal quarter or when events or circumstances indicate that we may not collect the balance due. While we use the best information available in making our determination, the ultimate recovery of recorded receivables is also dependent upon future economic events and other conditions that may be beyond our control.
Impairment of equity method investments
We evaluate our equity method investments for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances occurs that may have a significant adverse impact on the fair value of the investment. If a loss in value has occurred and is deemed to be other


- 50-



than temporary, an impairment loss is recorded. We review several factors to determine whether a loss has occurred that is other than temporary, including absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the length and extent of the fair value decline, and the financial condition and future prospects of the investee. Accordingly, significant judgment is applied in evaluating our equity method investments for impairment, including projected cash flows of equity method investments, which is dependent on projected revenue growth, operating expenses, and restaurant development, as well as industry and market conditions. If the estimates or underlying assumptions change in the future, we may be required to record impairment charges.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued new guidance for goodwill impairment which requires only a single-step quantitative test to identify and measure impairment and record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. The option to perform a qualitative assessment first for a reporting unit to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary does not change under the new guidance. This guidance is effective for us beginning in fiscal year 2020 with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this guidance in fiscal year 2017. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued new guidance addressing diversity in practice that exists in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statements of cash flows. This guidance is effective for us beginning in fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this guidance retrospectively beginning in fiscal year 2017. Upon adoption, restricted cash will be combined with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end of period balances in the consolidated statements of cash flows, and the current presentation of changes in restricted cash within operating and financing activities will be eliminated. Upon adoption of this guidance, net cash provided by operating activities will be reduced by $2.1 million and will increase by $65.7 million for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively, and net cash used in financing activities will increase by $106 thousand and will be reduced by $6.8 million for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on our consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets.
In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance for employee share-based compensation which simplifies several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including excess tax benefits, forfeiture estimates, statutory tax withholding requirements, and classification in the statements of cash flows. This guidance is effective for us in fiscal year 2017 with early adoption permitted. We expect to adopt this new guidance in fiscal year 2017. Upon adoption, any future excess tax benefits or deficiencies will be recorded to the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations instead of additional paid-in capital in the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, excess tax benefits will be presented retrospectively as an operating cash inflow instead of a financing cash inflow in the statements of cash flows. During fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, $2.7 million, $11.5 million, and $10.8 million, respectively, of excess tax benefits were recorded to additional paid-in capital that would have been recorded as a reduction to the provision for income taxes, and such amounts would have been classified as operating cash inflows instead of financing cash inflows in the consolidated statements of cash flows, if this new guidance had been adopted asSee note 2(v) of the respective dates.
In February 2016,notes to the FASB issued new guidance for lease accounting, which replaces existing lease accounting guidance. The new guidance aims to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. This guidance is effective for us in fiscal year 2019 with early adoption permitted, and modified retrospective application is required. We expect to adopt this new guidance in fiscal year 2019 and are currently evaluating the impact the adoption of this new guidance will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We expect that substantially all of our operating lease commitments (see note 11 to our consolidated financial statements included herein) will be subject to the new guidance and will be recognized as operating lease liabilities and right-of-use assets upon adoption.
In May 2014, the FASB issued new guidance for revenue recognition related to contracts with customers, except for contracts within the scope of other standards, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance provides a single framework in which revenue is required to be recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance is effective for us in fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in fiscal year 2017. We expect to adopt this new guidance in fiscal year 2018 using the full retrospective transition method, which will result in restating each prior reporting period presented in the year of adoption. We expect the adoption of the new guidance to change the timing of recognition of initial franchise fees, including master license and territory fees for our international business, and renewal fees. Currently, these fees are generally recognized upfront upon either opening of the respective restaurant or when a renewal agreement becomes effective. The new guidance will generally require these fees to be recognized over the term of the related franchise license for the respective restaurant, which we expect will result in a material impact to revenue recognized for franchise fees and renewal fees. We do not expect this new guidance to materially impact the recognition of royalty income, rental income, or sales of ice cream and other products. We are continuing to evaluate the impact the adoptionItem 8 of this new guidance will have on these and other revenue transactions, as well as the presentationForm 10-K for a detailed description of advertising fund revenues and expenses, in addition to the impact onrecent accounting policies and related disclosures.pronouncements.







- 51-46-





Item 7A.Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market RiskRisk.
Foreign exchange risk
We are subject to inherent risks attributed to operating in a global economy. Most of our revenues, costs, and debts are denominated in U.S. dollars. However, royalty income from our international franchisees is payable in U.S. dollars, and is generally based on a percentage of franchisee gross sales denominated in the foreign currency of the country in which the point of distribution is located, and is therefore subject to foreign currency fluctuations. Additionally, our investments in, and equity income from, joint ventures are denominated in foreign currencies, and are therefore also subject to foreign currency fluctuations. For fiscal year 2016,2019, a 5% change in foreign currencies relative to the U.S. dollar would have had an approximately $1.2$1.5 million impact on international royalty income and an approximately $0.7$0.9 million impact on equity in net income of joint ventures. Additionally, a 5% change in foreign currencies as of December 31, 201628, 2019 would have had a $5.7$7.7 million impact on the carrying value of our investments in joint ventures. In the future, we may consider the use of derivative financial instruments, such as forward contracts, to manage foreign currency exchange rate risks.




- 52-47-





Item 8.Financial Statements and Supplementary DataData.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
TheTo the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.:


Opinion on the ConsolidatedFinancial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015, and29, 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit),deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016. 28, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 28, 2019, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated February 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
Change in Accounting Principle
As discussed in Note 2(v) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has changed its method of accounting for leases as of December 30, 2018 due to the adoption of Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Topic 842,Leases.
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includesmisstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence supportingregarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. An auditOur audits also includes assessingincluded evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statement presentation.statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion,Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements referredthat were communicated or required to above present fairly,be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in all material respects, the financial position of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three‑year period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), andany way our report dated February 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectivenessconsolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.
Evaluation of Cumulative Breakage Related to Dunkin’ Gift Cards
As discussed in Note 2(n) to the consolidated financial statements, the Company estimates the likelihood of gift card redemption in order to determine its gift card liability and the amount of revenue that should be recognized from unredeemed gift cards (“breakage”). For gift cards enrolled in the Company’s Dunkin’ loyalty program, breakage is estimated and recognized at the point in time when the likelihood of redemption of any remaining card balance becomes remote, generally after a certain period of inactivity. For gift cards not enrolled in the Company’s Dunkin’ loyalty program, the Company makes certain assumptions to estimate redemption patterns and the rates at which breakage will occur, including:


- 48-



Whether the gift cards have redemption patterns similar to those enrolled in the Company’s Dunkin’ loyalty program
Expected redemption patterns for newly activated and reloaded gift cards

We identified the evaluation of the Company’s estimate of cumulative breakage related to Dunkin’ gift cards not enrolled in the Dunkin’ loyalty program as a critical audit matter. There was a high degree of auditor judgment required to evaluate the underlying key assumptions used by the Company to estimate the redemption patterns and rates of breakage.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controlcontrols over the Company’s gift card liability estimation process, including controls related to the development and analysis of breakage rates and the underlying data utilized. We compared the Company’s cumulative breakage estimate to independently calculated amounts utilizing actual historical redemption activity and independently determined forecasted redemption patterns. We also performed a comparison of the rates of breakage utilized in prior periods to the rates utilized in the current period.
Evaluation of the Incremental Borrowing Rates Used to Calculate Operating Lease Assets and Liabilities upon the Adoption of Accounting Standards Codification Topic 842, Leases
As discussed in Note 2(v) to the consolidated financial reporting.statements, the Company adopted ASC Topic 842, Leases on December 30, 2018. ASC Topic 842 requires, among other things, a lessee to recognize operating lease assets and operating lease liabilities for operating leases with a lease term greater than 12 months. In order to calculate the present value of the lease payments used to record the operating lease assets and liabilities upon transition, the Company estimated incremental borrowing rates based on the remaining lease terms as of the adoption date. The Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rates reflect considerations such as market rates for the Company’s outstanding collateralized debt, interpolations of rates for leases with terms that differ from the Company’s outstanding debt, and market rates for debt of companies with similar credit ratings. As a result of the adoption of ASC Topic 842, the Company recorded $388.8 million of operating lease assets and $435.1 million of operating lease liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.

We identified the evaluation of the incremental borrowing rates used to calculate operating lease assets and liabilities recorded upon the adoption of ASC Topic 842 as a critical audit matter. There was a high degree of auditor judgment in evaluating the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rates due to the sensitivity of the present value of the lease payments to possible changes in the estimated incremental borrowing rates.
The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included the following. We tested certain internal controls over the Company’s process to determine the incremental borrowing rates utilized in the calculation of operating lease assets and liabilities recorded upon the adoption of ASC Topic 842. We involved valuation professionals with specialized skills and knowledge who assisted in:
Evaluating the methodology used to estimate the incremental borrowing rates;
Evaluating the Company’s use of market rates of its outstanding collateralized debt as of the adoption date as an input to estimate the incremental borrowing rates; and
Creating independent estimates of incremental borrowing rates using a combination of a benchmark yield curve and market rates for the Company’s outstanding collateralized debt and compared the results to the Company’s estimated incremental borrowing rates.

/s/ KPMG LLP
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2005.

Boston, Massachusetts
February 21, 201724, 2020






- 53-49-





DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except share data)
December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Assets      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$361,425
 260,430
$621,152
 517,594
Restricted cash69,746
 71,917
85,644
 79,008
Accounts receivable, net44,512
 53,142
76,019
 75,963
Notes and other receivables, net40,672
 75,218
57,174
 64,412
Restricted assets of advertising funds40,338
 38,554
Prepaid income taxes20,926
 23,899
16,701
 27,005
Prepaid expenses and other current assets28,739
 34,664
50,611
 49,491
Total current assets606,358
 557,824
907,301
 813,473
Property and equipment, net176,662
 182,614
Property, equipment, and software, net223,120
 209,202
Operating lease assets371,264
 
Equity method investments114,738
 106,878
154,812
 146,395
Goodwill888,272
 889,588
888,286
 888,265
Other intangible assets, net1,378,720
 1,401,208
1,302,721
 1,334,767
Other assets62,632
 59,007
72,520
 64,479
Total assets$3,227,382
 3,197,119
$3,920,024
 3,456,581
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit      
Current liabilities:      
Current portion of long-term debt$25,000
 25,000
$31,150
 31,650
Capital lease obligations589
 546
Operating lease liabilities35,863
 
Accounts payable12,682
 18,663
89,413
 80,037
Liabilities of advertising funds52,271
 50,189
Deferred income35,393
 31,535
Deferred revenue39,950
 38,541
Other current liabilities298,266
 292,859
386,050
 389,353
Total current liabilities424,201
 418,792
582,426
 539,581
Long-term debt, net2,401,998
 2,420,600
3,004,216
 3,010,626
Capital lease obligations7,550
 7,497
Unfavorable operating leases acquired11,378
 12,975
Deferred income12,154
 15,619
Operating lease liabilities380,647
 
Deferred revenue324,854
 331,980
Deferred income taxes, net461,810
 476,510
197,673
 204,027
Other long-term liabilities71,549
 65,869
18,218
 83,164
Total long-term liabilities2,966,439
 2,999,070
3,925,608
 3,629,797
Commitments and contingencies (note 17)   
Commitments and contingencies (note 16)

 

Stockholders’ deficit:      
Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 25,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding
 

 
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 475,000,000 shares authorized; 91,464,229 shares issued and 91,437,452 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016; 92,668,211 shares issued and 92,641,044 shares outstanding at December 26, 201591
 92
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 475,000,000 shares authorized; 82,835,830 shares issued and 82,834,830 shares outstanding at December 28, 2019; 82,587,373 shares issued and 82,560,596 shares outstanding at December 29, 201883
 82
Additional paid-in capital807,492
 876,557
561,345
 642,017
Treasury stock, at cost; 26,777 shares and 27,167 shares at December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, respectively(1,060) (1,075)
Treasury stock, at cost; 1,000 shares and 26,777 shares at December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively(64) (1,060)
Accumulated deficit(945,797) (1,076,479)(1,129,565) (1,338,709)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(23,984) (20,046)(19,809) (15,127)
Total stockholders’ deficit of Dunkin’ Brands(163,258) (220,951)
Noncontrolling interests
 208
Total stockholders’ deficit(163,258) (220,743)(588,010) (712,797)
Total liabilities and stockholders’ deficit$3,227,382
 3,197,119
$3,920,024
 3,456,581




DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share data)
Fiscal year endedFiscal year ended
December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Revenues:          
Franchise fees and royalty income$549,571
 513,222
 482,329
$604,431
 578,342
 555,206
Advertising fees and related income499,303
 493,590
 470,984
Rental income101,020
 100,422
 97,663
122,671
 104,413
 104,643
Sales of ice cream and other products114,857
 115,252
 117,484
91,362
 95,197
 96,388
Sales at company-operated restaurants11,975
 28,340
 22,206
Other revenues51,466
 53,697
 29,027
52,460
 50,075
 48,330
Total revenues828,889
 810,933
 748,709
1,370,227
 1,321,617
 1,275,551
Operating costs and expenses:          
Occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants57,409
 54,611
 53,395
79,244
 58,102
 60,301
Cost of ice cream and other products77,608
 76,877
 83,129
75,771
 77,412
 77,012
Company-operated restaurant expenses13,591
 29,900
 22,687
General and administrative expenses, net246,814
 243,796
 226,301
Advertising expenses506,755
 498,019
 476,157
General and administrative expenses238,678
 246,792
 243,828
Depreciation20,458
 20,556
 19,779
18,429
 19,932
 20,084
Amortization of other intangible assets22,079
 24,688
 25,760
18,454
 21,113
 21,335
Long-lived asset impairment charges149
 623
 1,484
551
 1,648
 1,617
Total operating costs and expenses438,108
 451,051
 432,535
937,882
 923,018
 900,334
Net income (loss) of equity method investments:     
Net income, excluding impairment14,552
 12,555
 14,846
Impairment charge
 (54,300) 
Net income (loss) of equity method investments14,552
 (41,745) 14,846
Other operating income, net9,381
 1,430
 7,838
Net income of equity method investments17,517
 14,903
 15,198
Other operating income (loss), net1,188
 (1,670) 627
Operating income414,714
 319,567
 338,858
451,050
 411,832
 391,042
Other income (expense), net:          
Interest income582
 424
 274
9,934
 7,200
 3,313
Interest expense(100,852) (96,765) (68,098)(128,411) (128,748) (104,423)
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions
 (20,554) (13,735)(13,076) 
 (6,996)
Other losses, net(1,195) (1,084) (1,566)
Other income (loss), net(235) (1,083) 391
Total other expense, net(101,465) (117,979) (83,125)(131,788) (122,631) (107,715)
Income before income taxes313,249
 201,588
 255,733
319,262
 289,201
 283,327
Provision for income taxes117,673
 96,359
 80,170
77,238
 59,295
 12,118
Net income including noncontrolling interests195,576
 105,229
 175,563
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
 2
 (794)
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands$195,576
 105,227
 176,357
Net income242,024
 229,906
 271,209
Earnings per share:          
Common—basic$2.14
 1.10
 1.67
$2.92
 2.75
 2.99
Common—diluted2.11
 1.08
 1.65
2.89
 2.71
 2.94
Cash dividends declared per common share1.20
 1.06
 0.92




DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In thousands)
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Net income including noncontrolling interests$195,576
 105,229
 175,563
Other comprehensive income (loss), net:     
Effect of foreign currency translation, net of deferred tax expense (benefit) of $(638), $524, and $358 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014, respectively(2,560) (6,721) (13,743)
Effect of interest rate swaps, net of deferred tax benefit of $882, $867, and $1,608 for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014, respectively(1,299) (1,273) (2,369)
Effect of pension plan, net of deferred tax expense of $866 and $80 for the fiscal years ended December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014, respectively
 2,874
 224
Other(79) (949) 572
Total other comprehensive loss, net(3,938) (6,069) (15,316)
Comprehensive income including noncontrolling interests191,638
 99,160
 160,247
Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests
 2
 (794)
Comprehensive income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands$191,638
 99,158
 161,041
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Net income$242,024
 229,906
 271,209
Other comprehensive income (loss), net:     
Effect of foreign currency translation, net of deferred tax benefit (expense) of $(10), $93, and $(621) for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2019, December 29, 2018, and December 30, 2017, respectively(4,534) (6,223) 14,824
Effect of interest rate swaps, net of deferred tax benefit of $778 for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017
 
 (1,144)
Other, net(148) 631
 658
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net(4,682) (5,592) 14,338
Comprehensive income$237,342
 224,314
 285,547




DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)Deficit
(In thousands)
Stockholders equity (deficit)
 Redeemable noncontrolling interests
Stockholders deficit
Common stock 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Treasury
stock, at cost
 
Accumulated
deficit
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
income (loss)
 Noncontrolling interests Total Common stock 
Additional
paid-in
capital
 
Treasury
stock, at cost
 
Accumulated
deficit
 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
 Total
Shares Amount Shares Amount 
Balance at December 28, 2013106,877
 $107
 1,196,426
 (10,773) (779,741) 1,339
 
 407,358
 4,930
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 176,357
 
 
 176,357
 (794)
Other comprehensive loss, net
 
 
 
 
 (15,316) 
 (15,316) 
Balance at December 31, 201691,293
 $91
 807,492
 (1,060) (1,129,238) (23,873) (346,588)
Net income
 
 
 
 271,209
 
 271,209
Other comprehensive income, net
 
 
 
 
 14,338
 14,338
Exercise of stock options693
 1
 5,119
 
 
 
 
 5,120
 
1,158
 1
 36,494
 
 
 
 36,495
Contributions from redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 2,855
Dividends paid on common stock
 
 (96,775) 
 
 
 
 (96,775) 
Dividends paid on common stock ($1.29 per share)
 
 (117,003) 
 
 
 (117,003)
Share-based compensation expense26
 
 11,287
 
 
 
 
 11,287
 
46
 
 14,926
 
 
 
 14,926
Repurchases of common stock
 
 
 (130,171) 
 
 
 (130,171) 

 
 
 (127,186) 
 
 (127,186)
Retirement of treasury stock(3,142) (3) (33,170) 140,944
 (107,771) 
 
 
 
(2,271) (2) (18,861) 127,186
 (108,323) 
 
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
 
 10,758
 
 
 
 
 10,758
 
Other
 (1) (282) 
 (376) 
 
 (659) 
28
 
 1,066
 
 (1,796) 
 (730)
Balance at December 27, 2014104,454
 104
 1,093,363
 
 (711,531) (13,977) 
 367,959
 6,991
Net income (loss)
 
 
 
 105,227
 
 208
 105,435
 (206)
Balance at December 30, 201790,254
 90
 724,114
 (1,060) (968,148) (9,535) (254,539)
Net income
 
 
 
 229,906
 
 229,906
Other comprehensive loss, net
 
 
 
 
 (6,069) 
 (6,069) 

 
 
 
 
 (5,592) (5,592)
Exercise of stock options816
 1
 10,352
 
 
 
 
 10,353
 
2,721
 3
 95,177
 
 
 
 95,180
Purchase of redeemable noncontrolling interests
 
 566
 
 
 
 
 566
 (6,785)
Dividends paid on common stock
 
 (100,516) 
 
 
 
 (100,516) 
Dividends paid on common stock ($1.39 per share)
 
 (114,828) 
 
 
 (114,828)
Share-based compensation expense33
 
 16,092
 
 
 
 
 16,092
 
61
 
 14,879
 
 
 
 14,879
Repurchases of common stock
 
 (25,000) (600,041) 
 
 
 (625,041) 

 
 
 (680,368) 
 
 (680,368)
Retirement of treasury stock(12,833) (13) (129,405) 598,966
 (469,548) 
 
 
 
(10,629) (11) (81,160) 680,368
 (599,197) 
 
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
 
 11,503
 
 
 
 
 11,503
 
Other
 
 (398) 
 (627) 
 
 (1,025) 
30
 
 3,835
 
 (1,270) 
 2,565
Balance at December 26, 201592,470
 92
 876,557
 (1,075) (1,076,479) (20,046) 208
 (220,743) 
Balance at December 29, 201882,437
 82
 642,017
 (1,060) (1,338,709) (15,127) (712,797)
Net income
 
 
 
 195,576
 
 
 195,576
 

 
 
 
 242,024
 
 242,024
Other comprehensive loss, net
 
 
 
 
 (3,938) 
 (3,938) 

 
 
 
 
 (4,682) (4,682)
Exercise of stock options433
 1

10,646
 
 
 
 
 10,647
 
655
 1

30,728
 
 
 
 30,729
Deconsolidation of noncontrolling interest
 
 
 
 
 
 (208) (208) 
Dividends paid on common stock
 
 (109,703) 
 
 
 
 (109,703) 
Dividends paid on common stock ($1.50 per share)
 
 (124,089) 
 
 
 (124,089)
Share-based compensation expense68
 
 17,181
 
 
 
 
 17,181
 
164
 
 14,042
 
 
 
 14,042
Repurchases of common stock
 
 25,000
 (80,000) 
 
 
 (55,000) 

 
 
 (29,715) 
 
 (29,715)
Retirement of treasury stock(1,707) (2)
(15,874)
80,000

(64,124) 
 
 
 
(441) 

(3,048)
32,942

(29,894) 
 
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation
 
 2,735
 
 
 
 
 2,735
 
Other29
 
 950
 15
 (770) 
 
 195
 
21
 
 1,695
 (2,231) (2,986) 
 (3,522)
Balance at December 31, 201691,293
 $91
 807,492
 (1,060) (945,797) (23,984) 
 (163,258) 
Balance at December 28, 201982,836
 $83
 561,345
 (64) (1,129,565) (19,809) (588,010)




DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
Fiscal year endedFiscal year ended
December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Cash flows from operating activities:          
Net income including noncontrolling interests$195,576
 105,229
 175,563
Net income$242,024
 229,906
 271,209
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation and amortization42,537
 45,244
 45,539
42,378
 45,031
 45,239
Amortization of debt issuance costs and original issue discount6,398
 5,969
 3,968
Amortization of debt issuance costs4,977
 5,019
 6,179
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions
 20,554
 13,735
13,076
 
 6,996
Deferred income taxes(12,537) (21,107) (24,639)(6,257) (9,897) (121,247)
Provision for bad debt53
 3,343
 2,821
2,862
 631
 457
Share-based compensation expense17,181
 16,092
 11,287
14,042
 14,879
 14,926
Net loss (income) of equity method investments(14,552) 41,745
 (14,846)
Net income of equity method investments(17,517) (14,903) (15,198)
Dividends received from equity method investments5,247
 6,671
 7,427
4,367
 4,509
 4,711
Gain on sale of real estate and company-operated restaurants(9,373) (1,402) (7,458)
Other, net(2,172) 1,083
 570
(714) 2,791
 (1,767)
Change in operating assets and liabilities:          
Restricted cash2,113
 (65,673) 
Accounts, notes, and other receivables, net40,535
 (26,316) (27,224)4,392
 (19,776) (18,496)
Prepaid income taxes, net2,289
 591
 (4,300)10,408
 (4,996) (2,441)
Other current assets(3,742) (6,185) 552
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(5,677) (1,561) (6,481)
Accounts payable(6,308) 6,514
 397
7,735
 26,974
 5,066
Other current liabilities5,377
 40,258
 11,876
(3,407) 34,144
 30,031
Liabilities of advertising funds, net1,233
 (1,124) (2,785)
Deferred income393
 1,866
 5,770
Deferred revenue(5,743) (41,071) 59,606
Other, net5,957
 12,214
 1,070
(9,212) (2,725) 4,567
Net cash provided by operating activities276,205
 185,566
 199,323
297,734
 268,955
 283,357
Cash flows from investing activities:          
Additions to property and equipment(15,174) (30,246) (23,638)
Proceeds from sale of real estate and company-operated restaurants20,523
 2,693
 14,361
Additions to property, equipment, and software(36,762) (51,855) (21,055)
Other, net(4,006) (7,914) (4,827)1,270
 20
 752
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities1,343
 (35,467) (14,104)
Net cash used in investing activities(35,492) (51,835) (20,303)
Cash flows from financing activities:          
Proceeds from issuance of long-term debt
 2,500,000
 
1,700,000
 
 1,400,000
Repayment of long-term debt(25,000) (1,837,824) (15,000)(1,707,025) (31,600) (754,375)
Payment of debt issuance and other debt-related costs
 (41,350) (9,213)(17,937) 
 (18,441)
Repurchases of common stock, including accelerated share repurchases(55,000) (625,041) (130,171)(29,715) (680,368) (127,186)
Dividends paid on common stock(109,703) (100,516) (96,775)(124,089) (114,828) (117,003)
Change in restricted cash106
 (6,770) 
Exercise of stock options10,647
 10,353
 5,120
30,729
 95,331
 36,344
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation2,735
 11,503
 10,758
Other, net(122) (7,211) 1,924
(4,611) (895) (698)
Net cash used in financing activities(176,337) (96,856) (233,357)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents(216) (893) (715)
Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents100,995
 52,350
 (48,853)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year260,430
 208,080
 256,933
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year$361,425
 260,430
 208,080
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities(152,648) (732,360) 418,641
Effect of exchange rates on cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash62
 (538) 572
Increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash109,656
 (515,778) 682,267
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, beginning of year598,321
 1,114,099
 431,832
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of year$707,977
 598,321
 1,114,099
Supplemental cash flow information:          
Cash paid for income taxes$125,681
 106,924
 99,410
$73,383
 74,775
 135,927
Cash paid for interest94,212
 90,564
 64,485
123,459
 126,868
 91,606
Noncash operating activities:     
Leased assets obtained in exchange for operating lease liabilities, net15,702
 
 
Noncash investing activities:          
Property and equipment included in accounts payable and other current liabilities920
 579
 2,383
Purchase of leaseholds in exchange for capital lease obligations624
 475
 1,094
Property, equipment, and software included in accounts payable and other current liabilities4,253
 2,713
 2,637
Leased assets obtained in exchange for finance lease liabilities, net
 325
 449
Purchase of property, equipment, and software in exchange for note payable
 1,500
 
Noncash financing activities:     
Receivable from exercise of stock options included in notes and other receivables, net
 
 151




DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements


(1) Description of business and organization
Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. (“DBGI”), together with its consolidated subsidiaries, is one of the world’s leading franchisors of restaurants serving coffee and baked goods, as well as ice cream, within the quick service restaurant segment of the restaurant industry. We develop, franchise and license a system of both traditional and nontraditional quick service restaurants and, in limited circumstances, have owned and operated individual locations.restaurants. Through our Dunkin’ Donuts brand, we develop and franchise restaurants featuring coffee, espresso, donuts, bagels, breakfast sandwiches, and related products. Additionally, we license Dunkin’ Donuts brand products sold in certain retail outlets such as retail packaged coffee, and Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods.pods, and ready-to-drink bottled iced coffee. Through our Baskin-Robbins brand, we develop and franchise restaurants featuring ice cream, frozen beverages, and related products. Additionally, we distribute Baskin-Robbins ice cream products to Baskin-Robbins franchisees and licensees in certain international markets.markets for sale in Baskin-Robbins restaurants and certain retail outlets.
Throughout these consolidated financial statements, “Dunkin’ Brands,” “the Company,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “management” refer to DBGI and its consolidated subsidiaries taken as a whole.
(2) Summary of significant accounting policies
(a) Fiscal year
The Company operates and reports financial information on a 52- or 53-week year on a 13-week quarter basis with the fiscal year ending on the last Saturday in December and fiscal quarters ending on the 13th Saturday of each quarter (or 14th Saturday when applicable with respect to the fourth fiscal quarter). The data periods contained within fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017 reflect the results of operations for the 53-week period ended December 31, 2016, and the 52-week periods ended December 26, 201528, 2019, December 29, 2018, and December 27, 2014,30, 2017, respectively.
(b) Basis of presentation and consolidation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of DBGI and subsidiaries and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”). All significant transactions and balances between subsidiaries and affiliates have been eliminated in consolidation.
In fiscal year 2019, we adopted new guidance for lease accounting, which replaced existing lease accounting guidance, using the modified retrospective transition method and elected the option to not restate comparative periods in the year of adoption, including amounts as of December 29, 2018 and for fiscal years 2018 and 2017 (see note 2(v)).
We consolidate entities in which we have a controlling financial interest, the usual condition of which is ownership of a majority voting interest. We also consider for consolidation an entity, in which we have certain interests, where the controlling financial interest may be achieved through arrangements that do not involve voting interests. Such an entity, known as a variable interest entity (“VIE”), is required to be consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary is the entity that possesses the power to direct the activities of the VIE that most significantly impact its economic performance and has the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the VIE that are significant to it. The principal entities in which we possess a variable interest include franchise entities the advertising funds (see note 4), and our equity method investees. We do not possess any ownership interests in franchise entities, except for our investments in various entities that are accounted for under the equity method. Additionally, we generally do not provide financial support to franchise entities in a typical franchise relationship. As our franchise and license arrangements provide our franchisee and licensee entities the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact their economic performance, we do not consider ourselves the primary beneficiary of any such entity that might be a VIE. Based on the results of our analysis of potential VIEs, we have not consolidated any franchise entities, with the exception of those noted below. The Company’s maximum exposure to loss resulting from involvement with potential franchise VIEs is attributable to aged trade and notes receivable balances, outstanding loan guarantees, and future lease payments due from franchisees (see note 11)10).
Noncontrolling interests included within total stockholders’ deficit in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 26, 2015 represented interests in a franchise entity that was deemed a variable interest entity and for which the Company was the primary beneficiary. As of December 31, 2016, the Company was no longer the primary beneficiary of the franchise entity and deconsolidated the noncontrolling interests from the Company's consolidated financial statements.
The Company previously held a 51% interest in a limited partnership that owned and operated Dunkin’ Donuts restaurants in the Dallas, Texas area. The Company possessed control of this entity and, therefore, consolidated the results of the limited partnership. The partnership agreement contained a redemption feature that was probable to become redeemable in the future, and this interest was therefore classified as temporary equity (between liabilities and stockholders’ deficit) in the consolidated balance sheets. The net loss and comprehensive loss attributable to the noncontrolling interest are presented separately in the


- 59-



consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income, respectively. During fiscal year 2015, the Company purchased the remaining interests in the limited partnership.
(c) Accounting estimates
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates, judgments, and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and for the period then ended. Significant estimates are made in the calculations and assessments of the following: (a) allowance for doubtful accounts and notes receivables, (b) impairment of tangible and intangible assets, (c) other-than-temporary impairment of equity method investments, (d) income taxes, (e) share-based compensation, (f) lease accounting estimates, including incremental borrowing rates and expected lease term, (g) gift


- 55-



card/certificate breakage, (h) management fees charged to subsidiaries and affiliates,contingencies, and (i) contingencies.revenue recognition. Estimates are based on historical experience, current conditions, and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. These estimates form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities when they are not readily apparent from other sources. We adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
(d) Cash, and cash equivalents, and restricted cash
The Company continually monitors its positions with, and the credit quality of, the financial institutions in which it maintains its deposits and investments. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018, we maintained balances in various cash accounts in excess of federally insured limits. All highly liquid instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less are considered cash equivalents.
Cash held related to the advertising funds and the Company’s gift card/certificate programs areis classified as unrestricted cash as there are no legal restrictions on the use of these funds; however, the Company intends to use these funds solely to support the advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs rather than to fund operations. Total cash balances related to the advertising funds and gift card/certificate programs as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 were $177.9242.2 million and $148.6207.3 million, respectively.
In accordance with the Company’s securitized financing facility, certain cash accounts have been established in the name of Citibank, N.A. (the “Trustee”) for the benefit of the Trustee and the noteholders, and are restricted in their use. The Company holds restricted cash which primarily represents (i) cash collections held by the Trustee, (ii) interest, principal, and commitment fee reserves held by the Trustee related to the Company’s Notesnotes (see note 8)8), and (iii) real estate reserves used to pay real estate obligations. Changes in
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash accountswithin the consolidated balance sheets that are presented as either a component of cash flows from operating or financing activitiesincluded in the consolidated statements of cash flows based on the natureas of the restricted balance.December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Cash and cash equivalents$621,152
 517,594
Restricted cash85,644
 79,008
Restricted cash, included in Other assets1,181
 1,719
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash$707,977
 598,321

(e) Fair value of financial instruments
The carrying amounts of accounts receivable, notes and other receivables, assets and liabilities related to the advertising funds, accounts payable, and other current liabilities approximate fair value because of their short-term nature. For long-term receivables, we review the creditworthiness of the counterparty on a quarterly basis, and adjust the carrying value as necessary. We believe the carrying value of long-term receivables of $3.15.8 million and $2.45.0 million as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018, respectively, approximates fair value.
Financial assets and liabilities are categorized, based on the inputs to the valuation technique, into a three-level fair value hierarchy. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities and lowest priority to unobservable inputs. Observable market data, when available, is required to be used in making fair value measurements. When inputs used to measure fair value fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the level within which the fair value measurement is categorized is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.




- 60-56-





Financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 are summarized as follows (in thousands):
  December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018
  
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 Total 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 Total
Assets:        
Company-owned life insurance $12,367
 12,367
 9,906
 9,906
Total assets $12,367
 12,367
 9,906
 9,906
Liabilities:        
Deferred compensation liabilities $7,216
 7,216
 9,759
 9,759
Total liabilities $7,216
 7,216
 9,759
 9,759

  December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
  
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 Total 
Significant
other
observable
inputs
(Level 2)
 Total
Assets:        
Company-owned life insurance $9,271
 9,271
 5,802
 5,802
Total assets $9,271
 9,271
 5,802
 5,802
Liabilities:        
Deferred compensation liabilities $11,126
 11,126
 9,068
 9,068
Total liabilities $11,126
 11,126
 9,068
 9,068
The deferred compensation liabilities relate to the Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. non-qualified deferred compensation plans (“NQDC Plans”), which allow for pre-tax deferral of compensation for certain qualifying employees and directors (see note 18)17). Changes in the fair value of the deferred compensation liabilities are derived using quoted prices in active markets of the asset selections made by the participants. The deferred compensation liabilities are classified within Level 2, as defined under U.S. GAAP, because their inputs are derived principally from observable market data by correlation to hypothetical investments. The Company holds company-owned life insurance policies to partially offset the Company’s liabilities under the NQDC Plans. The changes in the fair value of any company-owned life insurance policies are derived using determinable cash surrender value. As such, the company-owned life insurance policies are classified within Level 2, as defined under U.S. GAAP.
The carrying value and estimated fair value of long-term debt as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018
Financial liabilities
Carrying
value
 
Estimated
fair value
 
Carrying
value
 
Estimated
fair value
Total long-term debt$3,035,366
 3,149,505
 3,042,276
 3,011,843
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Financial liabilities
Carrying
value
 
Estimated
fair value
 
Carrying
value
 
Estimated
fair value
Long-term debt$2,426,998
 2,460,544
 2,445,600
 2,443,687

The estimated fair value of our long-term debt is estimated primarily based on current market rates for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities or current bidmidpoint prices for our long-term debt. Judgment is required to develop these estimates. As such, ourthe estimated fair value of long-term debt is classified within Level 2, as defined under U.S. GAAP.
(f) Inventories
Inventories consist primarily of ice cream products sold to certain international markets that are in-transit from our third-party manufacturer to our international licensees, during which time we hold title to such products. The majority of ice cream products are purchased from one supplier. Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value, and cost is generally determined based on the actual cost of the specific inventory sold. InventoriesAn immaterial amount of inventories are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
(g) Assets held for sale
Assets held for sale primarily represent costs incurred by the Company for storeProperty, equipment, and leasehold improvements constructed for sale to franchisees, as well as restaurants formerly operated by franchisees or the Company waiting to be resold. The value of such restaurants and related assets is reduced to reflect net recoverable values, with such reductions recorded to general and administrative expenses, net in the consolidated statements of operations. Generally, internal specialists estimate the amount to be recovered from the sale of such assets based on their knowledge of the (a) market in which the store is located, (b) results of the Company’s previous efforts to dispose of similar assets, and (c) current economic conditions. The actual cost of such assets held for sale is affected by specific factors such as the nature, age, location, and condition of the assets, as well as the economic environment and inflation.
We classify restaurants and their related assets as held for sale and suspend depreciation and amortization when (a) we make a decision to refranchise or sell the property, (b) the stores are available for immediate sale, (c) we have begun an active program to locate a buyer, (d) significant changes to the plan of sale are not likely, and (e) the sale is probable within one year. Assets held for sale are included within prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets.


- 61-



As of December 26, 2015, prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet included $8.8 million of assets held for sale, which primarily consisted of property and equipment, net and goodwill. As of December 31, 2016, assets held for sale were immaterial.
(h) Property and equipmentsoftware
Property, equipment, and equipmentsoftware are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the respective assets. Leasehold improvements are depreciated over the shorter of the estimated useful life or the remaining lease term of the related asset. Estimated useful lives are as follows:
 Years
Buildings20 – 35
Leasehold improvements5 – 20
Store, production, and other equipment3 – 10
Software3 – 7

Depreciation related to the U.S. Advertising Funds segment is included within advertising expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.


- 57-



Routine maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred. Major improvements, additions, or replacements that extend the life, increase capacity, or improve the safety or the efficiency of property are capitalized at cost and depreciated. Major improvements to leased property are capitalized as leasehold improvements and depreciated. Interest costs incurred during the acquisition period of capital assets are capitalized as part of the cost of the asset and depreciated. Long-lived assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of their carrying amount or fair value less estimated costs to sell.
(i)(h) Leases
WhenWe determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception or modification of a contract and classify each lease as either an operating or finance lease at commencement. Leases that are economically similar to the purchase of assets are generally classified as finance leases; otherwise, the leases are classified as operating leases. The Company only reassesses lease classification subsequent to commencement upon a change to the expected lease term or modification of the contract. Finance and operating lease assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset as lessee for the lease term, and lease obligations represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. These assets and obligations are recognized at the lease commencement date based on the present value of lease payments, net of incentives, over the lease term. Generally, the Company's lease contracts do not provide a readily determinable implicit rate and, therefore, the Company uses an estimated incremental borrowing rate as of the lease commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The estimate of the incremental borrowing rate reflects considerations such as market rates for the Company’s outstanding collateralized debt, interpolations of rates for leases with terms that differ from the outstanding debt, and market rates for debt of companies with similar credit ratings. The lease asset also reflects any prepaid rent, initial direct costs incurred, and lease incentives received. The Company’s lease terms, we begin with the point at which the Company obtains controlas both lessee and possession of the leased properties. Welessor, include option periods for which failure to renewextend or terminate the lease imposes a penalty on the Company in such an amountwhen it is reasonably certain that the renewal appears, at the inception of the lease, tothose options will be reasonably assured,exercised, which are generally includes option periods through the end of the related franchise agreement term. We also include any rent holidays in the determination of the lease term.Options to extend have varying rates and terms for each lease.
We record rentlease expense and rentlease income for leasesas lessee and subleases,lessor, respectively, that contain scheduled rent increases on a straight-line basis over the lease term as defined above. We occasionally provide to our sublessees tenant improvement allowances, which are recorded as a deferred rent asset and amortized on a straight-line basis over the sublease term. In certain cases, contingent rentalsthe Company also has variable lease payments and receipts that are based on sales levels of our franchisees, in excess of stipulated amounts. Contingent rentalsThe Company is generally obligated for the cost of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance relating to its leases, which are often variable lease payments. Such costs are typically charged to the sublessee based on the terms of the sublease agreements. These costs are presented on a gross basis in the consolidated statements of operations in rental income and occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants. Variable lease receipts and payments are included in rentrental income and rent expense as they are earned orand accrued, respectively.
We occasionally provide to our sublessees, or receive from our landlords, tenant improvement dollars. Tenant improvement dollars paid to our sublessees are recorded The Company accounts for the lease components and non-lease components, primarily maintenance, as a deferred rent asset. For fixed asset and/single lease component for new and modified leases under the new lease accounting guidance. Leases with an initial expected term of 12 months or leasehold purchases for which we receive tenant improvement dollars from our landlords, we recordless are not recorded in the propertyconsolidated balance sheets and equipment and/or leasehold improvements gross and establish a deferred rent obligation. The deferredthe related lease assets and obligations are amortizedexpense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the determined sublease and lease terms, respectively.term.
Management regularly reviews sublease arrangements, where we are the lessor, for losses on sublease arrangements. We recognize a loss, discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates, when costs expected to be incurred under an operating prime lease exceed the anticipated future revenue stream of the operating sublease. Furthermore, for properties where we do not currently have an operational franchise or other third-party sublessee and are under long-term lease agreements, the present value of any remaining liability under the lease, discounted using credit-adjusted risk-free rates and net of estimated sublease recovery, is recognized as a liability and recorded as an operating expense at the time we cease use of the property. The value of any equipment and leasehold improvements related to a closed store is assessed for potential impairment (see note 2(j)).
(j)(i) Impairment of long-lived assets
Long-lived assets that are used in operations are tested for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable through undiscounted future cash flows. Recognition and measurement of a potential impairment is performed on assets grouped with other assets and liabilities at the lowest level where identifiable cash flows are largely independent of the cash flows of other assets and liabilities. An impairment loss is the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset or asset group exceeds its estimated fair value. Fair value is generally estimated by internal specialists based on the present value of anticipated future cash flows or, if required, with the assistance of independent third-party valuation specialists, depending on the nature of the assets or asset group.


- 62-



(k)(j) Equity method investments
The Company’s equity method investments consist of interests in B-R 31 Ice Cream Co., Ltd. (“Japan JV”), BR-Korea Co., Ltd. (“South Korea JV”), and Palm Oasis Pty. Ltd. (“Australia JV”), which are accounted for in accordance with the equity method. The Company also previously accounted for an ownership interest in Coffee Alliance, S.L. (“Spain JV”) in accordance with the equity method, which interest was sold during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 (see note 6).
The Company evaluates its equity method investments for impairment whenever an event or change in circumstances occurs that may have a significant adverse impact on the fair value of the investment. If a loss in value has occurred and is deemed to be other than temporary, an impairment loss is recorded. Several factors are reviewed to determine whether a loss has occurred that is other than temporary, including absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment, the length and extent of the fair value decline, and the financial condition and future prospects of the investee.
(l)

- 58-



(k) Goodwill and other intangible assets
Goodwill and trade names (“indefinite-lived intangibles”) have been assigned to our reporting units, which are also our operating segments, for purposes of impairment testing. All of our reporting unitsDunkin’ U.S., Dunkin’ International, Baskin-Robbins U.S., and Baskin-Robbins International have indefinite-lived intangibles associated with them.
We evaluate the remaining useful life of our trade names to determine whether current events and circumstances continue to support an indefinite useful life. In addition, all of our indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually. We first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that a trade name is impaired. In the event we were to determine that the carrying value of a trade name would more likely than not exceed its fair value, quantitative testing would be performed which consists of a comparison of the fair value of each trade name with its carrying value, with any excess of carrying value over fair value being recognized as an impairment loss. For goodwill, we first perform a qualitative assessment to determine if the fair value of the reporting unit is more likely than not greater than the carrying amount. In the event we were to determine that a reporting unit’s carrying value would more likely than not exceed its fair value, quantitative testing would be performed which consists of a comparison of each reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. The fair value of a reporting unit is an estimate of the amount for which the unit as a whole could be sold in a current transaction between willing parties. If the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its fair value, goodwill impairment is written downcalculated as the difference between the carrying value of the reporting unit and its fair value, but not exceeding the carrying amount of goodwill allocated to its implied fair value.that reporting unit. We have selected the first day of our fiscal third quarter as the date on which to perform our annual impairment test for all indefinite-lived intangible assets. We also test for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the fair value of such indefinite-lived intangibles has been impaired.
Other intangible assets consist primarily of franchise and international license rights (“franchise rights”), ice cream distribution and territorial franchise agreement license rights (“license rights”), andfavorable operating lease interests acquired related to our prime leases and subleaseswhere the Company is the lessor (“operating leases acquired”). Franchise rights license rights, and favorable operating leases acquired recorded in the consolidated balance sheets were valued using an appropriate valuation method duringas of the perioddate of acquisition. Amortization of franchise rights, license rights and favorable operating leases acquired is recorded as amortization expense in the consolidated statements of operations and amortized over the respective franchise license, and lease terms using the straight-line method.
Unfavorable operating leases acquired related to our prime and subleaseswhere the Company is the lessor are recorded within other long-term liabilities in the liability section of the consolidated balance sheets and are amortized into rental expense and rental income respectively, over the base lease term of the respective leases using the straight-line method. The weighted average amortization period for all unfavorable operating leases acquired is 1816 years.
Management makes adjustments to the carrying amount of such intangible assets and unfavorable operating leases acquired if they are deemed to be impaired using the methodology for long-lived assets (see note 2(j)), or when such license or lease agreements are reduced or terminated.
(m)(l) Contingencies
The Company records reserves for legal and other contingencies when information available to the Company indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Predicting the outcomes of claims and litigation and estimating the related costs and exposures involve substantial uncertainties that could cause actual costs to vary materially from estimates. Legal costs incurred in connection with legal and other contingencies are expensed as the costs are incurred.


- 63-



(n)(m) Foreign currency translation
We translate assets and liabilities of non-U.S. operations into U.S. dollars at rates of exchange in effect at the balance sheet date, and revenues and expenses at the average exchange rates prevailing during the period. Resulting translation adjustments are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive lossincome (loss) and stockholders’ deficit, net of deferred taxes. Foreign currency translation adjustments primarily result from our equity method investments, as well as subsidiaries located in Canada, the UK, Australia, and other foreign jurisdictions. Transactions resulting in foreign exchange gains and losses are included in the consolidated statements of operations.
(o)(n) Revenue recognition
Revenue is recognized in accordance with a five-step revenue model, as follows: identifying the contract with the customer; identifying the performance obligations in the contract; determining the transaction price; allocating the transaction price to the performance obligations; and recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies a performance obligation.
Franchise fees and royalty income
Domestically, the Company sells individual franchises as well as territory agreements in the form of store development agreements (“SDAs”) that grant the right to develop restaurants in designated areas. OurThe franchise agreements and SDAs typically require the franchisee to pay an initial nonrefundable feefranchise fees prior to opening the respective restaurants and continuing fees, or royalty income, on a weekly basis based upon a percentage of franchisee gross sales. The initial term of


- 59-



domestic franchise agreements is typically 20 years. Prior to the end of the franchise term or as otherwise provided by the Company, a franchisee may elect to renew the term of a franchise agreement and, if approved, will typically pay us a renewal fee if we approve a renewalupon execution of the franchise agreement. Such fees are paid by franchisees to obtain the rights associated with these franchise agreements or SDAs. Initial franchise fee revenue is recognized upon substantial completion of the services required of the Company as stated in therenewal term. If approved, a franchisee may transfer a franchise agreement or SDA to a new or existing franchisee, at which point a transfer fee is generally upon opening of the respective restaurant. Fees collected in advance are deferred until earned, with deferred amounts expected to be recognized as revenue within one year classified as current deferred income in the consolidated balance sheets. Royalty income is based on a percentage of franchisee gross sales and is recognized when earned, which occurs at the franchisees’ point of sale. Renewal fees are recognized when a renewal agreement with a franchisee becomes effective.paid. Occasionally, the Company offers incentive programs to franchisees in conjunction with a franchise/license agreement, territory agreement, or renewal agreement.
Internationally, the Company sells master franchise agreements that grant the master franchisee the right to develop and operate, and in some instances sub-franchise, a certain number of restaurants within a particular geographic area. The master franchisee is typically required to pay an upfront market entry fee upon entering into the master franchise agreement SDA, or renewal agreement and when appropriate, recordsan upfront initial franchise fee for each developed restaurant prior to each respective opening. For the costs of such programs as reductions of revenue.
For ourDunkin’ brand and in certain Baskin-Robbins international business, we sell master territory and/or license agreements that typically allowmarkets, the master licensee to either actfranchisee will also pay continuing fees, or royalty income, generally on a monthly basis based upon a percentage of sales. Generally, the master franchise agreement serves as the franchisee orfranchise agreement for the underlying restaurants, and the initial franchise term provided for each restaurant typically ranges between 10 and 20 years.
Generally, the franchise license granted for each individual restaurant within an arrangement represents a single performance obligation. Therefore, initial franchise fees and market entry fees for each arrangement are allocated to sub-franchise to other operators. Master licenseeach individual restaurant and territoryrecognized over the term of the respective franchise agreement from the date of the restaurant opening. Royalty income is also recognized over the term of the respective franchise agreement based on the royalties earned each period as the underlying sales occur. Renewal fees are generally recognized upon substantial completionover the renewal term for the respective restaurant from the start of the services requiredrenewal period. Transfer fees are recognized over the remaining term of the Company as stated in the franchise agreement beginning at the time of transfer. Incentives provided to franchisees in conjunction with a franchise/license agreement, territory agreement, or renewal agreement are recognized over the remaining term of the respective agreement. Additionally, for Baskin-Robbins international markets that do not pay a royalty, a portion of the consideration from the sales of ice cream and other products is allocated to royalty income as consideration for the use of the franchise license, which is generally upon opening ofrecognized when the first restaurantrelated sales occur and is estimated based on royalty rates in effect for markets where the franchise license is sold on a standalone basis. Fees received or receivable that are expected to be recognized as storesrevenue within one year are opened, dependingclassified as current deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets.
Advertising fees and related income
Domestically and in limited international markets, franchise agreements typically require the franchisee to pay continuing advertising fees on the specific terms of the agreement. Royalty income isa weekly basis based on a percentage of franchisee gross sales, and is recognized when earned, which generally occurs atrepresents a portion of the franchisees’ pointconsideration received for the single performance obligation of sale. Renewalthe franchise license. Continuing advertising fees are recognized over the term of the respective franchise agreement based on the fees earned each period as the underlying sales occur.
The Company and its franchisees sell gift cards that are redeemable for products in our Dunkin’ and Baskin-Robbins restaurants. The Company manages the gift card program, and therefore collects all funds from the activation of gift cards and reimburses franchisees for the redemption of gift cards in their restaurants. A liability for unredeemed gift cards, as well as historical gift certificates sold, is included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
There are no expiration dates or service fees charged on the gift cards. While the franchisees continue to honor all gift cards presented for payment, the likelihood of redemption may be determined to be remote for certain cards due to long periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, the Company may recognize revenue from unredeemed gift cards (“breakage revenue”) if they are not subject to unclaimed property laws. For Dunkin’ gift cards enrolled in the DD Perks® Rewards loyalty program and other cards with expected similar redemption behavior, breakage is estimated and recognized at the point in time when the likelihood of redemption of any remaining card balance becomes remote, generally after a renewal agreement with a franchiseeperiod of sufficient inactivity. Breakage revenue on all other Dunkin’ gift cards and all Baskin-Robbins gift cards is estimated and recognized over time in proportion to actual gift card redemptions, based on historical redemption rates. Significant judgment is required in estimating breakage rates and in determining whether to recognize breakage revenue over time or licenseewhen the likelihood of redemption becomes effective.remote.
The Company also collects gift card program service fees from franchisees to offset the costs to administer the gift card program. The gift card program service fees are based on the volume of gift card transactions processed and are recognized as the underlying transactions occur.
Rental income
Rental income for base rentals is recorded on a straight-line basis over the lease term including the amortization of any tenant improvement dollars paid (see note 2(i)2(h)). The differences between the straight-line rent amounts and amounts receivable under the leases are recorded as deferred rent assets in current or long-termlong-


- 60-



term assets, as appropriate. Contingent rental income isVariable lease receipts are recognized as earned, and any amounts received from lessees in advance of achieving stipulated thresholds are deferred until such thresholds are actually achieved. Deferred contingent rentalsvariable lease receipts are recorded as deferred incomerevenue in current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
Sales of ice cream and other products
We distribute Baskin-Robbins ice cream products and, in limited cases, Dunkin’ Donuts products to franchisees and licensees in certain international locations. Revenue from the sale of ice cream and other products, including distribution fees, is recognized when title and risk of loss transfers to the buyer, which is generally upon delivery.
Sales at company-operated restaurants
Retail store revenues at company-operated restaurants were recognized when payments were tendered at the point of sale, net of sales tax Payment for ice cream and other sales-related taxes. Asproducts is generally due within a relatively short period of December 31, 2016, the Company did not own or operate any restaurants.time subsequent to delivery.
Other revenues
Other revenues include fees generated by licensing our brand names and other intellectual property, as well as gains, net of losses and transactions costs, from the sales of restaurants that were not company-operated to new or existing franchisees. Licensing fees are recognized when earned, which is generally upon saleover the term of the expected license agreement, with sales-based license fees being recognized based on the amount earned each period as the underlying products by the licensees.sales occur. Gains on the refranchise or sale of a restaurant are recognized whenover the sale transaction closes, the franchisee has a minimum amountterm of the purchase price in at-risk equity, and we are satisfied that the buyer can meet its financial obligations to us. If the criteria for gain recognition are not met, we defer the gain to the extent we have any remaining financial exposure in connection with the sale transaction. Deferred gains are recognized when the gain recognition criteria are met.related agreement.


- 64-



(p)(o) Allowance for doubtful accounts
We monitor the financial condition of our franchisees and licensees and record provisions for estimated losses on receivables when we believe that our franchisees or licensees are unable to make their required payments. While we use the best information available in making our determination, the ultimate recovery of recorded receivables is also dependent upon future economic events and other conditions that may be beyond our control. Included in the allowance for doubtful notes and accounts receivables is a provision for uncollectible royalty, franchise fee, advertising fee, lease, ice cream, and licensing fee receivables.
(q)(p) Share-based payments
We measure compensation cost at fair value on the date of grant for all share-based awards and recognize compensation expense over the service period that the awards are expected to vest. The Company has elected to recognize compensation cost for graded-vesting awards subject only to a service condition over the requisite service period of the entire award. Forfeitures are estimated based on historical and forecasted turnover.
(r)Excess tax benefits related to share-based compensation are recorded to the provision for income taxes in the consolidated statements of operations.
(q) Income taxes
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recorded for the expected future tax consequences of items that have been included in our consolidated financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of assets and liabilities and the respective tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates that are expected to apply in years in which the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The effects of changes in tax rates and changes in apportionment of income between tax jurisdictions on deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized in the consolidated statements of operations in the year in which the law is enacted or change in apportionment occurs.occurs (see note 15). Valuation allowances are provided when the Company does not believe it is more likely than not that it will realize the benefit of identified tax assets. We have made an accounting policy election to treat taxes due under the global intangible low-taxed income provision as a current period expense.
A tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return is recognized in the financial statements when it is more likely than not that the position would be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. A recognized tax position is then measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. Estimates of interest and penalties on unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in the provision for income taxes.
(s)(r) Comprehensive income
Comprehensive income is primarily comprised of net income, foreign currency translation adjustments, and gains and losses on interest rate swaps, and is reported in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income, net of taxes, for all periods presented. Additionally, comprehensive income included pension gains and losses for fiscal years 2015 and 2014. As a result of the final settlement of the pension plan in fiscal year 2015, no pension gains and losses were recorded in 2016 (see note 18).
(t)

- 61-



(s) Debt issuance costs
Debt issuance costs represent capitalizable costs incurred related to the issuance and refinancing of the Company’s long-term debt (see note 8)8). As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018, debt issuance costs of $29.3$29.4 million and $35.7$29.5 million, respectively, are included in long-term debt, net in the consolidated balance sheets, and are being amortized over the remaining maturities of the debt, based on projected required repayments, using the effective interest rate method.
(u) Gift card/certificate breakage
The Company and our franchisees sell gift cards that are redeemable for product in our Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins restaurants. The Company manages the gift card program, and therefore collects all funds from the activation of gift cards and reimburses franchisees for the redemption of gift cards in their restaurants. A liability for unredeemed gift cards, as well as historical gift certificates sold, is included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.
There are no expiration dates on our gift cards, and we do not charge any service fees. While our franchisees continue to honor all gift cards presented for payment, we may determine the likelihood of redemption to be remote for certain cards due to long periods of inactivity. In these circumstances, we may recognize income from unredeemed gift cards (“breakage income”) if they are not subject to unclaimed property laws.
For Dunkin’ Donuts gift cards enrolled in the DD Perks® Rewards loyalty program and other cards with expected similar redemption behavior, breakage is estimated and recognized at the point in time when the likelihood of redemption of any remaining card balance becomes remote, generally after a period of sufficient inactivity. Breakage on all other Dunkin’ Donuts gift cards and all Baskin-Robbins gift cards is estimated and recognized over time in proportion to actual gift card redemptions, based on historical redemption rates. The Company recognizes breakage as income only up to the amount of gift card program costs. Any incremental breakage on Dunkin' Donuts gift cards that exceeds gift card program costs is committed to fund future


- 65-



initiatives that will benefit the Dunkin’ Donuts gift card program or to offset future gift card program costs. Any incremental breakage on Baskin-Robbins gift cards that exceeds gift card program costs is committed to fund future sales-driving initiatives for the benefit of Baskin-Robbins franchisees. The incremental breakage in excess of gift card program costs is recorded as a gift card breakage liability within other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets (see note 10).
For fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, total breakage income recognized on gift cards, as well as historical gift certificate programs, was $22.3 million, $15.9 million, and $8.5 million, respectively, and is recorded as a reduction to general and administrative expenses, net, to offset the related gift card program costs.
(v)(t) Concentration of credit risk
The Company is subject to credit risk through its accounts receivable consisting primarily of amounts due from franchisees and licensees for franchise fees, royalty income, advertising fees, and sales of ice cream and other products. In addition, we have note and lease receivables from certain of our franchisees and licensees. The financial condition of these franchisees and licensees is largely dependent upon the underlying business trends of our brands and market conditions within the quick service restaurant industry. This concentration of credit risk is mitigated, in part, by the large number of franchisees and licensees of each brand and the short-term nature of the franchise and license fee and lease receivables. At As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018, one1 master licensee, including its majority-owned subsidiaries, accounted for approximately 15% and 13%11%, respectively, of total accounts and notes receivable. For fiscal year 2014, one master licensee, including its majority-owned subsidiaries, accounted for approximately 10% of total revenues. No individual franchisee or master licensee accounted for more than 10% of total revenues for fiscal years 20162019, 2018, or 2015.2017.
Additionally, the Company engages various third parties to manufacture and/or distribute certain Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins products under licensing arrangements. As of December 26, 2015, one of these third parties accounted for approximately 13% of total accounts and notes receivable. No individual third party accounted for more than 10% of total accounts and notes receivable as of December 31, 2016.(u) Advertising expenses
(w) Recent accounting pronouncements
In January 2017, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued new guidance for goodwill impairment which requires only a single-step quantitative test to identify and measure impairment and record an impairment charge based on the excess of a reporting unit’s carrying amount over its fair value. The option to perform a qualitative assessment first for a reporting unit to determine if a quantitative impairment test is necessary does not change under the new guidance. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal year 2020 with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance in fiscal year 2017. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
In November 2016, the FASB issued new guidance addressing diversity in practice that exists in the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash in the statements of cash flows. This guidance is effective for the Company beginning in fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this guidance retrospectively beginning in fiscal year 2017. Upon adoption, restricted cash will be combined with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning and end of period balances in the consolidated statements of cash flows, and the current presentation of changes in restricted cash within operating and financing activities will be eliminated. Upon adoption of this guidance, net cash provided by operating activities will be reduced by $2.1 million and will increase by $65.7 million for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively, and net cash used in financing activities will increase by $106 thousand and will be reduced by $6.8 million for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively. The adoption of this guidance will have no impact on the consolidated statements of operations and balance sheets.
In March 2016, the FASB issued new guidance for employee share-based compensation which simplifies several aspects of accounting for share-based payment transactions, including excess tax benefits, forfeiture estimates, statutory tax withholding requirements, and classification in the statements of cash flows. This guidance is effective for the Company in fiscal year 2017 with early adoption permitted. The Company expects to adopt this new guidance in fiscal year 2017. Upon adoption, any future excess tax benefits or deficiencies will be recorded to the provision for income taxesAdvertising expenses in the consolidated statements of operations insteadincludes advertising expenses incurred by the Company, primarily through advertising funds, including those expenses for the administration of additional paid-in capitalthe gift card program. The Company expenses production costs of commercial advertising upon first airing and expenses the costs of communicating the advertising in the period in which the advertising occurs. Costs of print advertising and certain promotion-related items are deferred and expensed the first time the advertising is displayed. Prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets. Additionally, excess tax benefits will be presented retrospectively as an operating cash inflow instead of a financing cash inflow in the statements of cash flows. During fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, $2.7 million, $11.5sheets include $10.3 million and $10.8$15.0 million at December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively, of excess tax benefits were recordedthat was related to additional paid-in capital that would have been recorded as a reductionadvertising. Advertising expenses are allocated to interim periods in relation to the provision for income taxes, and such amounts would have been classified as operating cash inflows instead of financing cash inflows in the consolidated statements of cash flows, if this new guidance had been adopted asrelated revenues. When revenues of the respective dates.advertising fund exceed the related advertising expenses, advertising costs are accrued up to the amount of revenues.
(v) Recent accounting pronouncements
In February 2016,fiscal year 2019, the FASB issuedCompany adopted new guidance for lease accounting, which replacesreplaced existing lease accounting guidance. The new guidance aims to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring lessees to recognize lease


- 66-



assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and requiring disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. This guidance is effective for the Company in fiscal year 2019 with early adoption permitted, and modified retrospective application is required. The Company expects to adoptadopted this new guidance in fiscal year 2019 using the modified retrospective transition method and is currently evaluatingelected the impactoption to not restate comparative periods in the year of adoption, including amounts as of December 29, 2018 and for fiscal years 2018 and 2017.
As a result of adopting this new guidance will have on the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. The Company expects thatfirst day of fiscal year 2019, substantially all of itsthe Company’s operating lease commitments (see note 11) will bewere subject to the new guidance and will bewere recognized as operating lease assets and liabilities, and right-of-use assets upon adoption.
In May 2014,initially measured as the FASB issued new guidance for revenue recognition related to contracts with customers, except for contracts within the scopepresent value of other standards, which supersedes nearly all existing revenue recognition guidance. The new guidance provides a single framework in which revenue is required to be recognized to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which a company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance is effectivefuture lease payments for the remaining lease term discounted using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate based on the remaining lease term as of the adoption date. The Company inrecognized operating lease assets and liabilities of $388.8 million and $435.1 million, respectively, as of the first day of fiscal year 2018 with early adoption permitted in fiscal year 2017.2019. The Company expectsdifference between the assets and liabilities is attributable to adopt this new guidance in fiscal year 2018 using the full retrospective transition method, which will result in restating each prior reporting period presented inreclassification of certain existing lease-related assets and liabilities as an adjustment to the year of adoption. The Company expectsright-of-use assets. Finance leases, previously known as capital leases, were not impacted by the adoption of the new guidance, as finance lease liabilities and the corresponding assets were recorded on the consolidated balance sheet under the previous guidance. The accounting guidance for lessors remained largely unchanged from previous guidance, with the exception of the presentation of certain lease costs that the Company passes through to change the timing of recognition of initial franchise fees,lessees, including master licensebut not limited to, property taxes, insurance, and territory fees for our international business, and renewal fees. Currently, these feesmaintenance. These costs are generally recognized upfrontpaid by the Company and reimbursed by the lessee. Historically, these costs have been recorded on a net basis in the consolidated statements of operations, but are now presented on a gross basis upon either openingadoption of the respective restaurant or when a renewal agreement becomes effective.new guidance. The adoption of the new guidance will generally require these fees to be recognized over the term of the related franchise license for the respective restaurant, which we expect will resultresulted in a material impact to revenue recognized for franchise fees and renewal fees. The Company does not expect this new guidance to materially impact the recognition of royalty income,additional rental income and occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants of $19.2 million related to these lease costs during fiscal year 2019.


- 62-



The effects of the changes made to the Company's condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 30, 2018 for the adoption of the new lease guidance were as follows (in thousands):
 Balance at December 29, 2018 Adjustments due to adoption of the new lease guidance Balance at December 30, 2018
Assets     
Current assets:     
Prepaid expenses and other current assets$49,491
 (4,720) 44,771
Operating lease assets
 388,811
 388,811
Other intangible assets, net1,334,767
 (13,598) 1,321,169
Other assets64,479
 (961) 63,518
Liabilities and Stockholders' Deficit     
Current liabilities:     
Operating lease liabilities
 33,822
 33,822
Operating lease liabilities
 401,249
 401,249
Other long-term liabilities(a)
83,164
 (65,539) 17,625
(a)Other long-term liabilities at December 29, 2018 reflect certain reclassifications to conform to current period presentation as discussed below.
The adoption of the new guidance had no impact on net cash flows from operating, investing, or sales of ice creamfinancing activities and other products. had no impact on compliance with debt agreements.
The Company is continuingelected the package of practical expedients permitted under the new guidance, which, among other things, allowed the Company to evaluatecontinue utilizing historical classification of leases. However, the impactCompany did not adopt the hindsight practical expedient and therefore continued to utilize lease terms determined under previous lease guidance. See note 2(h) for additional information regarding our lease arrangements and the Company's updated lease accounting policies.
In conjunction with the adoption of this new lease guidance will have on these and other revenue transactions, as well asto conform to the current period presentation, the Company revised the presentation of advertising fund revenuescertain lease liabilities within the consolidated balance sheets. Other current liabilities and expenses, in additionother long-term liabilities totaling $0.5 million and $4.6 million as of December 29, 2018 were reclassified to thecurrent and long-term deferred revenue, respectively. Amounts separately presented as unfavorable operating leases acquired of $8.2 million as of December 29, 2018 were reclassified to other long-term liabilities. Additionally, amounts separately presented as current capital lease obligations and long-term capital lease obligations of $0.5 million and $7.0 million as of December 29, 2018 were reclassified to other current liabilities and other long-term liabilities, respectively. There was no impact on accounting policiesto total current liabilities and related disclosures.total long-term liabilities as a result of these reclassifications.
(x)(w) Subsequent events
Subsequent events have been evaluated up through the date that these consolidated financial statements were filed.


- 63-



(3) Franchise feesRevenue recognition
(a) Disaggregation of revenue
Revenues are disaggregated by timing of revenue recognition related to contracts with customers (“ASC 606”) and royalty income
Franchise fees and royalty income consisted of the followingreconciled to reportable segment revenues as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Royalty income$500,927
 463,960
 438,074
Initial franchise fees and renewal income48,644
 49,262
 44,255
Total franchise fees and royalty income$549,571
 513,222
 482,329
 Fiscal year ended ended December 28, 2019
 Dunkin’ U.S. Baskin-Robbins U.S. Dunkin’ International Baskin-Robbins International U.S. Advertising Funds Total reportable segment revenues 
Other(a)
 Total revenues
Revenues recognized under ASC 606               
Revenues recognized over time:               
Royalty income$510,378
 29,386
 23,027
 7,658
 
 570,449
 15,719
 586,168
Franchise fees13,498
 1,403
 3,302
 1,194
 
 19,397
 (1,134) 18,263
Advertising fees and related income
 
 
 
 473,644
 473,644
 5,139
 478,783
Other revenues2,559
 9,991
 190
 9
 
 12,749
 36,772
 49,521
Total revenues recognized over time526,435
 40,780
 26,519
 8,861
 473,644
 1,076,239
 56,496
 1,132,735
                
Revenues recognized at a point in time:               
Sales of ice cream and other products
 3,543
 
 102,696
 
 106,239
 (14,877) 91,362
Other revenues1,432
 244
 229
 (61) 
 1,844
 1,095
 2,939
Total revenues recognized at a point in time1,432
 3,787
 229
 102,635
 
 108,083
 (13,782) 94,301
                
Total revenues recognized under ASC 606527,867
 44,567
 26,748
 111,496
 473,644
 1,184,322
 42,714
 1,227,036
                
Revenues not subject to ASC 606               
Advertising fees and related income
 
 
 
 
 
 20,520
 20,520
Rental income118,227
 3,564
 
 880
 
 122,671
 
 122,671
Total revenues not subject to ASC 606118,227
 3,564
 
 880
 
 122,671
 20,520
 143,191
                
Total revenues$646,094
 48,131
 26,748
 112,376
 473,644
 1,306,993
 63,234
 1,370,227
(a)Revenues reported as “Other” include revenues earned through certain licensing arrangements, revenues generated from online training programs for franchisees, advertising fees and related income from international advertising funds, and breakage and other revenue related to the gift card program, all of which are not allocated to a specific segment. Additionally, the allocation of royalty income from sales of ice cream and other products and certain franchisee incentives are reported as “Other.”


- 64-



 Fiscal year ended December 29, 2018
 Dunkin’ U.S. Baskin-Robbins U.S. Dunkin’ International Baskin-Robbins International U.S. Advertising Funds Total reportable segment revenues 
Other(a)
 Total revenues
Revenues recognized under ASC 606               
Revenues recognized over time:               
Royalty income$483,883
 29,375
 20,111
 7,532
 
 540,901
 15,096
 555,997
Franchise fees18,029
 1,276
 2,196
 844
 
 22,345
 
 22,345
Advertising fees and related income
 
 
 
 454,608
 454,608
 18,516
 473,124
Other revenues2,287
 10,278
 5
 8
 
 12,578
 34,358
 46,936
Total revenues recognized over time504,199
 40,929
 22,312
 8,384
 454,608
 1,030,432
 67,970
 1,098,402
                
Revenues recognized at a point in time:               
Sales of ice cream and other products
 3,261
 
 106,284
 
 109,545
 (14,348) 95,197
Other revenues1,698
 257
 29
 170
 
 2,154
 985
 3,139
Total revenues recognized at a point in time1,698
 3,518
 29
 106,454
 
 111,699
 (13,363) 98,336
                
Total revenues recognized under ASC 606505,897
 44,447
 22,341
 114,838
 454,608
 1,142,131
 54,607
 1,196,738
                
Revenues not subject to ASC 606               
Advertising fees and related income
 
 
 
 
 
 20,466
 20,466
Rental income100,913
 2,971
 
 529
 
 104,413
 
 104,413
Total revenues not subject to ASC 606100,913
 2,971
 
 529
 
 104,413
 20,466
 124,879
                
Total revenues$606,810
 47,418
 22,341
 115,367
 454,608
 1,246,544
 75,073
 1,321,617
(a)Revenues reported as “Other” include revenues earned through certain licensing arrangements, revenues generated from online training programs for franchisees, advertising fees and related income from international advertising funds, and breakage and other revenue related to the gift card program, all of which are not allocated to a specific segment. Additionally, the allocation of royalty income from sales of ice cream and other products is reported as “Other.”



- 65-



 Fiscal year ended December 30, 2017
 Dunkin’ U.S. Baskin-Robbins U.S. Dunkin’ International Baskin-Robbins International U.S. Advertising Funds Total reportable segment revenues 
Other(a)
 Total revenues
Revenues recognized under ASC 606               
Revenues recognized over time:               
Royalty income$463,874
 29,724
 17,965
 7,009
 
 518,572
 14,271
 532,843
Franchise fees18,455
 978
 1,853
 1,077
 
 22,363
 
 22,363
Advertising fees and related income
 
 
 
 440,441
 440,441
 1,542
 441,983
Other revenues2,185
 10,564
 7
 8
 
 12,764
 32,893
 45,657
Total revenues recognized over time484,514
 41,266
 19,825
 8,094
 440,441
 994,140
 48,706
 1,042,846
                
Revenues recognized at a point in time:               
Sales of ice cream and other products
 3,448
 
 106,036
 
 109,484
 (13,096) 96,388
Other revenues1,446
 405
 (55) 238
 
 2,034
 639
 2,673
Total revenues recognized at a point in time1,446
 3,853
 (55) 106,274
 
 111,518
 (12,457) 99,061
                
Total revenues recognized under ASC 606485,960
 45,119
 19,770
 114,368
 440,441
 1,105,658
 36,249
 1,141,907
                
Revenues not subject to ASC 606               
Advertising fees and related income
 
 
 
 
 
 29,001
 29,001
Rental income101,073
 3,089
 
 481
 
 104,643
 
 104,643
Total revenues not subject to ASC 606101,073
 3,089
 
 481
 
 104,643
 29,001
 133,644
                
Total revenues$587,033
 48,208
 19,770
 114,849
 440,441
 1,210,301
 65,250
 1,275,551
(a)Revenues reported as “Other” include revenues earned through certain licensing arrangements, revenues generated from online training programs for franchisees, advertising fees and related income from international advertising funds, and breakage and other revenue related to the gift card program, all of which are not allocated to a specific segment. Additionally, the allocation of royalty income from sales of ice cream and other products is reported as “Other.”


- 66-



(b) Contract balances
Information about receivables, contract assets, and deferred revenue subject to ASC 606 is as follows (in thousands):
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
 Balance Sheet Classification
Receivables$86,104
 81,609
 76,455
 Accounts receivable, net, Notes and other receivables, net, and Other assets
Contract assets4,894
 
 
 Other assets
        
Deferred revenue:       
Current$27,213
 24,002
 27,724
 Deferred revenue—current
Long-term320,457
 327,333
 361,458
 Deferred revenue—long term
Total$347,670
 351,335
 389,182
  

Receivables relate primarily to payments due for royalties, franchise fees, advertising fees, sales of ice cream and other products, and licensing fees. Contract assets relate primarily to consideration paid to customers, including franchisee incentives, that exceeds the fixed consideration received for certain contracts, net of any revenue recognized. Deferred revenue primarily represents the Company’s remaining performance obligations under its franchise and license agreements for which consideration has been received or is receivable, and is generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the remaining term of the related agreement.
The decreases in the deferred revenue balances as of each of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 were driven primarily by revenues recognized that were included in the opening deferred revenue balances, as well as franchisee incentives provided in the respective fiscal years, offset by cash payments received or due in advance of satisfying our performance obligations. Revenues recognized that were included in the opening deferred revenue balances for the fiscal years ended December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 were $27.3 million and $30.0 million, respectively.
(c) Transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations
Estimated revenue expected to be recognized in the future related to performance obligations that are either unsatisfied or partially satisfied at December 28, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal year: 
2020$24,260
202119,211
202219,210
202319,202
202419,377
Thereafter207,779
Total$309,039

The estimated revenue in the table above does not contemplate future franchise renewals or new franchise agreements for restaurants for which a franchise agreement or SDA does not exist at December 28, 2019. Additionally, the table above excludes $54.4 million of consideration allocated to restaurants that were not yet open at December 28, 2019. The Company has applied the sales-based royalty exemption which permits exclusion of variable consideration in the form of sales-based royalties from the disclosure of remaining performance obligations in the table above.


- 67-



(d) Systemwide points of distribution
The changes in franchised and company-operatedsystemwide points of distribution were as follows:
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Systemwide points of distribution(a):
     
Systemwide points of distribution in operation—beginning of year20,912
 20,520
 20,080
Systemwide points of distribution—opened1,195
 1,213
 1,339
Systemwide points of distribution—closed(810) (821) (899)
Total systemwide points of distribution in operation—end of year21,297
 20,912
 20,520

(a)Restaurants that include both a Dunkin’ and a Baskin-Robbins restaurant are considered two points of distribution.

 Fiscal year ended
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Systemwide points of distribution:     
Franchised points of distribution in operation—beginning of year19,308
 18,821
 18,122
Franchised points of distribution—opened1,540
 1,536
 1,442
Franchised points of distribution—closed(819) (1,051) (744)
Net transfers from company-operated points of distribution51
 2
 1
Franchised points of distribution in operation—end of year20,080
 19,308
 18,821
Company-operated points of distribution—end of year
 49
 41
Total systemwide points of distribution—end of year20,080
 19,357
 18,862
During fiscal year 2016, the Company sold all remaining company-operated restaurants and recognized gains on sales of $7.6 million, which are included in other operating income, net in our consolidated statement of operations. As of December 31, 2016, the Company did not own or operate any restaurants.




- 67-



(4) Advertising funds
On behalf of the Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins domestic advertising funds, the Company collects a percentage, which is generally 5%, of gross retail sales from Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins domestic franchisees to be used for various forms of advertising for each brand. In most of our international markets, franchisees manage their own advertising expenditures, which are not included in the advertising fund results.
The Company administers and directs the development of all advertising and promotional programs in the advertising funds for which it collects advertising fees, in accordance with the provisions of our franchise agreements. The Company acts as, in substance, an agent with regard to these advertising contributions. We consolidate and report all assets and liabilities held by these advertising funds as restricted assets of advertising funds and liabilities of advertising funds within current assets and current liabilities, respectively, in the consolidated balance sheets. The assets and liabilities held by these advertising funds consist primarily of receivables, prepaid expenses, payables, accrued expenses, and any cumulative surplus or deficit related specifically to the advertising funds. The revenues, expenses, and cash flows of the advertising funds are not included in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations or consolidated statements of cash flows because the Company does not have complete discretion over the usage of the funds. Contributions to these advertising funds are restricted to advertising, product development, public relations, merchandising, and administrative expenses and programs to increase sales and further enhance the public reputation of each of the brands.
At December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, the Company had a net payable of $11.9 million and $11.6 million, respectively, to the various advertising funds.
To cover administrative expenses of the advertising funds, the Company charges each advertising fund a management fee for items such as facilities, accounting services, information technology, data processing, product development, legal, administrative support services, and other operating expenses, as well as share-based compensation expense for employees that provide services directly to the advertising funds. Management fees totaled $9.5 million, $9.7 million, and $7.6 million for fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively. Such management fees are included in the consolidated statements of operations as a reduction in general and administrative expenses, net.
The Company made discretionary contributions to certain advertising funds for the purpose of supplementing national and regional advertising in certain markets of $1.7 million for each of the fiscal years 2016 and 2015, and $2.1 million for fiscal year 2014, respectively. Additionally, the Company made net contributions to the advertising funds based on retail sales of company-operated restaurants of $596 thousand, $1.3 million, and $872 thousand for fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, respectively, which are included in company-operated restaurant expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. During fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company also funded advertising fund initiatives of $3.4 million, $2.3 million, and $5.2 million, respectively, which were contributed from the gift card breakage liability included within other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets (see note 2(u) and note 10).
(5) Property and equipment, net
Property and equipment at December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 consisted of the following (in thousands):
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Land$34,889
 33,346
Buildings50,571
 49,304
Leasehold improvements157,752
 154,479
Software, store, production, and other equipment52,922
 53,273
Construction in progress5,203
 3,837
Property and equipment, gross301,337
 294,239
Accumulated depreciation(124,675) (111,625)
Property and equipment, net$176,662
 182,614





- 68-





(4) Advertising funds
Assets and liabilities of the advertising funds, which are restricted in their use, included in the consolidated balance sheets were as follows (in thousands):
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Accounts receivable, net$20,194
 19,501
Notes and other receivables, net1,133
 16,050
Prepaid income taxes79
 11
Prepaid expenses and other current assets10,255
 14,978
Total current assets31,661
 50,540
Property, equipment, and software, net17,125
 15,187
Operating lease assets4,262
 
Other assets1,126
 1,255
Total assets$54,174
 66,982
    
Operating lease liabilities—current$1,932
 
Accounts payable69,232
 60,302
Deferred revenue—current(a)
(722) (743)
Other current liabilities48,089
 43,198
Total current liabilities118,531
 102,757
Operating lease liabilities—long-term2,241
 
Deferred revenue—long-term(a)
(6,053) (6,775)
Other long-term liabilities
 15
Total liabilities$114,719
 95,997
(a)Amounts represent franchisee incentives that have been deferred and are being recognized over the terms of the respective franchise agreements.
(5) Property, equipment, and software, net
Property, equipment, and software at December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018
Land$40,505
 40,394
Buildings56,443
 55,771
Leasehold improvements159,153
 157,976
Software, store, production, and other equipment92,499
 72,165
Construction in progress and software under development46,521
 30,446
Property, equipment, and software, gross395,121
 356,752
Accumulated depreciation(172,001) (147,550)
Property, equipment, and software, net$223,120
 209,202

(6) Equity method investments
The Company’s ownership interests in its equity method investments as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 were as follows:
Entity Ownership
Japan JV 43.3%
South Korea JV 33.3%
Australia JV 20.0%

The Company also had a 33.3% ownership interest in the Spain JV as of December 26, 2015, which was sold during the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016 for nominal consideration.

- 69-



Summary financial information for the equity method investments on an aggregated basis was as follows (in thousands):
December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Current assets$300,999
 288,106
$436,471
 399,776
Current liabilities120,611
 123,576
144,519
 143,689
Working capital180,388
 164,530
291,952
 256,087
Property, plant, and equipment, net153,038
 142,844
158,267
 162,718
Other assets124,676
 125,000
114,048
 123,165
Long-term liabilities48,460
 40,728
58,799
 55,830
Equity of equity method investments$409,642
 391,646
$505,468
 486,140
 
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Revenues$721,075
 699,981
 646,269
Gross profit389,642
 371,274
 345,302
Net income48,605
 35,570
 33,791
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Revenues$629,717
 622,982
 669,416
Gross profit329,206
 327,684
 363,536
Net income32,529
 33,650
 39,835
During fiscal year 2015, the Company assessed if there was an other-than-temporary loss in value of its investment in the Japan JV based on various factors, including continued declines in the operating performance and reduced future expectations of the Baskin-Robbins business in Japan, as well as an announced reconsideration of the amount of semi-annual dividend payments by the Japan JV. Accordingly, the Company engaged a third-party valuation specialist to assist the Company in determining the fair value of its investment in the Japan JV. The valuation of the investment was determined using a combination of market and income approaches to valuation. Based in part on the fair value determined by the independent third-party valuation specialist, the Company concluded that the carrying value of the investment in the Japan JV exceeded fair value by $54.3 million and that this reduction in value was other-than-temporary. As such, the Company recorded an impairment charge for that amount in fiscal year 2015.
The impairment of the Japan JV is reflected as a reduction to the Company’s equity method investments in the consolidated balance sheets. As the Company had previously recorded a step-up in the basis of our investment in the Japan JV comprising amortizable franchise rights and nonamortizable goodwill, the impairment was first allocated to fully impair these investor-level assets. The remaining impairment was recorded to the underlying assets of the Japan JV by fully impairing the underlying property, plant, and equipment, net of any related tax impact, with any residual impairment allocated ratably to other non-financial long-term assets.



- 69-




The comparison between the carrying value of the Company’s investments in the Japan JV and the South Korea JV and the underlying equity in net assets of those investments is presented in the table below (in thousands):
 Japan JV South Korea JV
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Carrying value of investment$18,759
 16,517
 136,811
 130,580
Underlying equity in net assets of investment36,861
 35,428
 140,777
 135,275
Carrying value less than the underlying equity in net assets(a)
$(18,102) (18,911) (3,966) (4,695)
 Japan JV South Korea JV
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
Carrying value of investment$10,789
 8,666
 104,253
 98,386
Underlying equity in net assets of investment34,312
 34,271
 109,992
 103,899
Carrying value less than the underlying equity in net assets(a)
$(23,523) (25,605) (5,739) (5,513)

(a)The deficits of costcarrying value relative to the underlying equity in net assets of the Japan JV and the South Korea JV as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 are primarily comprised of impairments of long-lived assets, net of tax, recorded in fiscal years 2015 and 2011, respectively.
The carrying values of our investments in the Australia JV for any period presented and in the Spain JV as of December 26, 2015 were not material.
(7) Goodwill and other intangible assets
The changes and carrying amounts of goodwill by reporting unit were as follows (in thousands):
 Dunkin’ U.S. Dunkin’ International Baskin-Robbins International Total
 Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance
Balances at December 30, 2017$1,148,579
 (270,441) 878,138
 10,170
 
 10,170
 24,037
 (24,037) 
 1,182,786
 (294,478) 888,308
Effects of foreign currency adjustments
 
 
 (43) 
 (43) 
 
 
 (43) 
 (43)
Balances at December 29, 20181,148,579
 (270,441) 878,138
 10,127
 
 10,127
 24,037
 (24,037) 
 1,182,743
 (294,478) 888,265
Effects of foreign currency adjustments
 
 
 21
 
 21
 
 
 
 21
 
 21
Balances at December 28, 2019$1,148,579
 (270,441) 878,138
 10,148
 
 10,148
 24,037
 (24,037) 
 1,182,764
 (294,478) 888,286



- 70-


 Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. Dunkin’ Donuts International Baskin-Robbins International Total
 Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance Goodwill Accumulated impairment charges Net Balance
Balances at December 27, 2014$1,151,599
 (270,441) 881,158
 10,212
 
 10,212
 24,037
 (24,037) 
 1,185,848
 (294,478) 891,370
Goodwill acquired724
 
 724
 
 
 
 
 
 
 724
 
 724
Goodwill disposed or held for sale(2,413) 
 (2,413) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (2,413) 
 (2,413)
Effects of foreign currency adjustments
 
 
 (93) 
 (93) 
 
 
 (93) 
 (93)
Balances at December 26, 20151,149,910
 (270,441) 879,469
 10,119
 
 10,119
 24,037
 (24,037) 
 1,184,066
 (294,478) 889,588
Goodwill disposed(1,331) 
 (1,331) 
 
 
 
 
 
 (1,331) 
 (1,331)
Effects of foreign currency adjustments
 
 
 15
 
 15
 
 
 
 15
 
 15
Balances at December 31, 2016$1,148,579
 (270,441) 878,138
 10,134
 
 10,134
 24,037
 (24,037) 
 1,182,750
 (294,478) 888,272

The goodwill acquired during fiscal year 2015 is related to the acquisition and consolidation of certain company-operated points of distribution. The goodwill disposed or held for sale during fiscal years 2016 and 2015 is related to the sale or reclassification of goodwill to assets held for sale of certain company-operated points of distribution.
Other intangible assets at December 31, 201628, 2019 consisted of the following (in thousands):
Weighted
average
amortization
period
(years)
 
Gross
carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 
Net
carrying
amount
Weighted-average
amortization
period
(years)
 
Gross
carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 
Net
carrying
amount
Definite-lived intangibles:            
Franchise rights20 $358,166
 (193,940) 164,226
20 $358,190
 (247,703) 110,487
Favorable operating leases acquired18 59,948
 (36,424) 23,524
16 7,202
 (5,938) 1,264
Indefinite-lived intangible:            
Trade namesN/A 1,190,970
 
 1,190,970
N/A 1,190,970
 
 1,190,970
 $1,609,084
 (230,364) 1,378,720
 $1,556,362
 (253,641) 1,302,721


- 70-



Other intangible assets at December 26, 201529, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):
 
Weighted-average
amortization
period
(years)
 
Gross
carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 
Net
carrying
amount
Definite-lived intangibles:       
Franchise rights20 $358,154
 (229,764) 128,390
Favorable operating leases acquired18 51,405
 (35,998) 15,407
Indefinite-lived intangible:       
Trade namesN/A 1,190,970
 
 1,190,970
   $1,600,529
 (265,762) 1,334,767

 
Weighted
average
amortization
period
(years)
 
Gross
carrying
amount
 
Accumulated
amortization
 
Net
carrying
amount
Definite-lived intangibles:       
Franchise rights20 $382,335
 (199,374) 182,961
Favorable operating leases acquired17 64,397
 (37,173) 27,224
License rights10 3,221
 (3,168) 53
Indefinite-lived intangible:       
Trade namesN/A 1,190,970
 
 1,190,970
   $1,640,923
 (239,715) 1,401,208
During fiscal year 2016, certain intangible assets with gross carrying amounts totaling $26.8 million became fully amortized and were written off as they no longer exist. Additionally, the changesThe change in the gross carrying amount of favorable operating leases acquired and weighted average amortization period from December 26, 201529, 2018 to December 31, 2016 are28, 2019 is primarily due to the impairmentadoption of favorablethe new lease accounting guidance in fiscal year 2019 (see note 2(v)). Favorable operating leases acquired resulting fromas of December 29, 2018 include operating lease terminations.interests acquired related to our prime leases and subleases. Favorable operating leases acquired as of December 28, 2019 include only those operating lease interests where the Company is the lessor.
Total estimated amortization expense for other intangible assets for fiscal years 20172020 through 20212024 is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal year: 
2020$18,341
202118,259
202218,174
202318,067
202417,981




- 71-


Fiscal year: 
2017$21,300
201821,163
201920,756
202020,305
202119,892

(8) Debt
Debt at December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
2015 Class A-2-II Notes$
 1,684,375
2017 Class A-2-I Notes588,000
 594,000
2017 Class A-2-II Notes784,000
 792,000
2019 Class A-2-I Notes597,000
 
2019 Class A-2-II Notes398,000
 
2019 Class A-2-III Notes696,500
 
Other1,250
 1,400
Debt issuance costs, net of amortization(29,384) (29,499)
Total long-term debt, net3,035,366
 3,042,276
Less current portion of long-term debt31,150
 31,650
Long-term debt, net$3,004,216
 3,010,626
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
Class A-2 Notes$2,456,250
 2,481,250
Debt issuance costs, net of amortization(29,252) (35,650)
Total debt2,426,998
 2,445,600
Less current portion of long-term debt25,000
 25,000
Total long-term debt$2,401,998
 2,420,600

Securitized Financing Facility
OnIn January 26, 2015, DB Master Finance LLC (the “Master Issuer”), a limited-purpose, bankruptcy-remote, wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of DBGI, entered into a base indenture and a related supplemental indenture (collectively, the “Indenture”) under which the Master Issuer may issue multiple series of notes. On the same date, the Master Issuer issued Series 2015-1 3.262% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “Class“2015 Class A-2-I Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $750.0 million and Series 2015-1 3.980% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “Class“2015 Class A-2-II Notes” and, together with the 2015 Class A-2-I Notes, the “Class“2015 Class A-2 Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $1.75 billion. In addition, the Master Issuer also issued Series 2015-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes, Class A-1 (the “Variable“2015 Variable Funding Notes” and, together with the 2015 Class A-2 Notes, the “Notes”“2015 Notes”), which allowsallowed the Master Issuer to borrow up to $100.0 million on a revolving basis. The
In October 2017, the Master Issuer issued Series 2017-1 3.629% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “2017 Class A-2-I Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $600.0 million and Series 2017-1 4.030% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “2017 Class A-2-II Notes” and, together with the 2017 Class A-2-I Notes, the “2017 Class A-2 Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $800.0 million. In addition, the Master Issuer issued Series 2017-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes, Class A-1 (the “2017 Variable Funding Notes” and, together with the 2017 Class A-2 Notes, the “2017 Notes”), which allow for the issuance of up to $150.0 million of 2017 Variable Funding Notes may also beand certain other credit instruments, including letters of credit. A portion of the proceeds of the 2017 Notes was used to issuerepay the remaining $731.3 million of principal outstanding on the 2015 Class A-2-I Notes and to pay related transaction fees. The additional net proceeds were used for general corporate purposes, which included a return of capital to the Company’s shareholders in 2018 (see note 12(b)). In connection with the issuance of the 2017 Variable Funding Notes, the Master Issuer terminated the commitments with respect to its existing 2015 Variable Funding Notes.
In April 2019, the Master Issuer issued Series 2019-1 3.787% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-I (the “2019 Class A-2-I Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $600.0 million, Series 2019-1 4.021% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-II (the “2019 Class A-2-II Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $400.0 million, and Series 2019-1 4.352% Fixed Rate Senior Secured Notes, Class A-2-III (the “2019 Class A-2-III Notes”, and together with the 2019 Class A-2-I Notes and 2019 Class A-2-II Notes, the “2019 Class A-2 Notes”) with an initial principal amount of $700.0 million. In addition, the Master Issuer issued Series 2019-1 Variable Funding Senior Secured Notes, Class A-1 (the “2019 Variable Funding Notes” and, together with the 2019 Class A-2 Notes, the “2019 Notes”), which allow for the issuance of up to $150.0 million of 2019 Variable Funding Notes and certain other credit instruments, including letters of credit. The proceeds received from the issuance of the 2019 Notes were used to repay the remaining $1.68 billion outstanding on the 2015 Class A-2-II Notes and to pay related transaction fees and expenses. In connection with the issuance of the 2019 Variable Funding Notes, the Master Issuer terminated the commitments with respect to its existing 2017 Variable Funding Notes.
The 2015 Notes, 2017 Notes, and 2019 Notes were each issued in a securitization transaction pursuant to which most of the Company’s domestic and certain of its foreign revenue-generating assets, consisting principally of franchise-related agreements, real estate assets, and intellectual property and license agreements for the use of intellectual property, are held by the Master Issuer and certain other limited-purpose, bankruptcy-remote, wholly-owned indirect subsidiaries of the Company that act, or acted, as guarantors of the 2015 Notes, 2017 Notes, and 2019 Notes and that have pledged substantially all of their assets to secure the 2015 Notes, 2017 Notes, and 2019 Notes.




- 71-72-





The 2015 Notes, 2017 Notes, and 2019 Notes were issued pursuant to a base indenture and related supplemental indentures (collectively, the “Indenture”) under which the Master Issuer may issue multiple series of notes. The legal final maturity date of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Class A-2 Notes is in February 2045,November 2047 and May 2049, respectively, but it is anticipated that, unless earlier prepaid to the extent permitted under the Indenture, the 2017 Class A-2-I Notes will be repaid in February 2019 andby November 2024, the 2017 Class A-2-II Notes will be repaid inby November 2027, the 2019 Class A-2-I Notes will be repaid by February 20222024, the 2019 Class A-2-II Notes will be repaid by May 2026, and the 2019 Class A-2-III Notes will be repaid by May 2029 (the “Anticipated Repayment Dates”). If the 2017 Class A-2 Notes or the 2019 Class A-2 Notes have not been repaid in fullor refinanced by their respective Anticipated Repayment Dates, a rapid amortization event will occur in which residual net cash flows of the Master Issuer, after making certain required payments, will be applied to the outstanding principal of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and the 2019 Class A-2 Notes. Various other events, including failure to maintain a minimum ratio of net cash flows to debt service (“DSCR”), may also cause a rapid amortization event. Borrowings under the 2017 Class A-2-I andNotes, 2017 Class A-2-II Notes, 2019 Class A-2-I Notes, 2019 Class A-2-II Notes, and 2019 Class A-2-III Notes bear interest at a fixed raterates equal to 3.262%3.629%, 4.030%, 3.787%, 4.021%, and 3.980%4.352%, respectively. If the 2017 Class A-2 Notes or the 2019 Class A-2 Notes are not repaid or refinanced prior to their respective Anticipated Repayment Dates, incremental interest will accrue. Principal payments are required to be made on the 2017 Class A-2-I andNotes, 2017 Class A-2-II Notes, 2019 Class A-2-I Notes, 2019 Class A-2-II Notes, and 2019 Class A-2-III Notes equal to $7.5$6.0 million, $8.0 million, $6.0 million, $4.0 million, and $17.5$7.0 million, respectively, per calendar year, payable in quarterly installments. No principal payments will beare required if a specified leverage ratio, which is a measure of outstanding debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization, adjusted for certain items (as specified in the Indenture), is less than or equal to 5.0 to 1.0, though the Company may elect to continue to make principal payments.1.0. Other events and transactions, such as certain asset sales and receipt of various insurance or indemnification proceeds, may trigger additional mandatory prepayments.
It is anticipated that the principal and interest on the 2019 Variable Funding Notes will be repaid in full on or prior to February 2020,August 2024, subject to two2 additional one-year extensions. Borrowings under the 2019 Variable Funding Notes bear interest at a rate equal to a base rate, a LIBOR rate plus 2.25%1.50%, or the lenders’ commercial paper funding rate plus 2.25%1.50%. If the 2019 Variable Funding Notes are not repaid prior to February 2020August 2024 or prior to the end of anthe extension period, if applicable, incremental interest will accrue. In addition, the Company is required to pay a 2.25%1.50% fee for letters of credit amounts outstanding and a commitment fee on the unused portion of the 2019 Variable Funding Notes which ranges from 0.50% to 1.00% based on utilization.
During the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017, as a result of the repayment of the remaining $731.3 million of principal outstanding on the 2015 Class A-2-I Notes, the Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $7.0 million, consisting of a $6.3 million write-off of the remaining debt issuance costs related to the 2015 Class A-2-I Notes and $726 thousand of make-whole interest premium costs associated with the early repayment of the 2015 Class A-2-I Notes.
Total debt issuance costs incurred and capitalized in connection with the issuance of the 2017 Notes were $41.3$17.7 million.
During the second quarter of fiscal year 2019, as a result of the repayment of the remaining $1.68 billion of principal outstanding on the 2015 Class A-2-II Notes, the Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $13.1 million, consisting of a write-off of the remaining debt issuance costs related to the 2015 Class A-2-II Notes.
Total debt issuance costs incurred and capitalized in connection with the issuance of the 2019 Notes were $17.9 million. The effective interest rate, including the amortization of debt issuance costs, was 3.5%3.8%, 4.2%, 3.9%, 4.2%, and 4.3%4.5% for the 2017 Class A-2-I Notes, and2017 Class A-2-II Notes, 2019 Class A-2-I Notes, 2019 Class A-2-II Notes, and 2019 Class A-2-III Notes, respectively, atas of December 31, 2016.28, 2019.
Total amortization of debt issuance costs related to the securitized financing facility was $6.4$5.0 million for each of the fiscal years 2019 and $5.62018 and $6.2 million for fiscal years 2016 and 2015, respectively,year 2017, which is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
As of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, $25.928, 2019, $33.1 million and $26.3 million, respectively, of letters of credit were outstanding against the 2019 Variable Funding Notes and as of December 29, 2018, $32.4 million of letters of credit were outstanding against the 2017 Variable Funding Notes, which relate primarily to interest reserves required under the Indenture. There were no0 amounts drawn down on these letters of credit as of December 31, 201628, 2019 or December 29, 2018.
The 2017 Class A-2 Notes and December 26, 2015.
The2019 Notes are subject to a series of covenants and restrictions customary for transactions of this type, including (i) that the Master Issuer maintains specified reserve accounts to be used to make required payments in respect of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes, (ii) provisions relating to optional and mandatory prepayments, including mandatory prepayments in the event of a change of control as defined in the Indenture and the related payment of specified amounts, including specified make-whole payments in the case of the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes under certain circumstances, (iii) certain indemnification payments in the event, among other things, the assets pledged as collateral for the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes are in stated ways defective or ineffective, and (iv) covenants relating to recordkeeping,


- 73-



access to information, and similar matters. As noted above, the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes are also subject to customary rapid amortization events provided for in the Indenture, including events tied to failure to maintain stated DSCR, failure to maintain an aggregate level of Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. retail sales on certain measurement dates, certain manager termination events, an event of default, and the failure to repay or refinance the 2017 Class A-2 Notes or the 2019 Notes on the applicable scheduled maturity date.Anticipated Repayment Dates. The 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes are also subject to certain customary events of default, including events relating to non-payment of required interest, principal, or other amounts due on or with respect to the 2017 Class A-2 Notes and 2019 Notes, failure to comply with covenants within certain time frames, certain bankruptcy events, breaches of specified representations and warranties, failure of security interests to be effective, and certain judgments.
Senior credit facility
In February 2014, Dunkin’ Brands, Inc. (“DBI”), a subsidiary of DBGI, amended its senior credit facility, resulting in a reduction of interest rates. As a result, during the first quarter of 2014, the Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions of $13.7 million, including $10.5 million related to the write-off of original issuance discount and debt issuance costs and $3.2 million of fees paid to third parties.
The proceeds from the issuance of the Class A-2 Notes were used to repay the remaining principal outstanding on the term loans. During fiscal year 2015, the Company recorded a loss on debt extinguishment of $20.6 million, consisting primarily of the write-off of the remaining original issuance discount and debt issuance costs related to the term loans.


- 72-



Maturities of long-term debt
Based on the Company's intention to make quarterly repayments and assuming repayment by the Anticipated Repayment Dates, the aggregate contractual principal payments of the 2019 Class A-2 Notes, the 2017 Class A-2 Notes, and other long term debt for 20172020 through 20212024 are as follows (in thousands):
 
2019
Class A-2-I Notes
 
2019
Class A-2-II Notes
 
2019
Class A-2-III Notes
 2017 Class A-2-I Notes 2017 Class A-2-II Notes Other Total
2020$6,000
 4,000
 7,000
 6,000
 8,000
 150
 31,150
20216,000
 4,000
 7,000
 6,000
 8,000
 150
 31,150
20226,000
 4,000
 7,000
 6,000
 8,000
 150
 31,150
20236,000
 4,000
 7,000
 6,000
 8,000
 150
 31,150
2024573,000
 4,000
 7,000
 564,000
 8,000
 150
 1,156,150
 Class A-2-I Notes Class A-2-II Notes Total
2017$7,500
 17,500
 25,000
20187,500
 17,500
 25,000
2019721,875
 17,500
 739,375
2020
 17,500
 17,500
2021
 17,500
 17,500
(9) Derivative instruments and hedging transactions
The Company’s hedging instruments have historically consisted solely of interest rate swaps to hedge the Company’s variable-rate term loans. In September 2012, the Company entered into variable-to-fixed interest rate swap agreements to hedge the risk of increases in cash flows (interest payments) attributable to increases in three-month LIBOR above the designated benchmark interest rate being hedged, through November 2017. As a result of the February 2014 amendment to the senior credit facility (see note 8), the Company amended the interest rate swap agreements to align the embedded floors with the amended term loans. As of the date of the amendment, a pre-tax gain of $5.8 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
Effective December 23, 2014, the Company terminated all interest rate swap agreements with its counterparties in anticipation of the securitization transaction and related repayment of the outstanding term loans (see note 8). In fiscal years 2014 and 2015, the Company received total cash proceeds equivalent to fair value of the interest rate swaps at the termination date of $5.3 million, which was net of accrued interest owed to the counterparties of $1.0 million. Upon termination, cash flow hedge accounting was discontinued and the cumulative pre-tax gain of $1.8 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss.
As of December 27, 2014, a pre-tax gain of $6.2 million was recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss, which included the gain related to both the February 2014 amendment and December 2014 termination. This pre-tax gain is being amortized on a straight-line basis to interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations through November 23, 2017, the original maturity date of the swaps. The Company estimates that $1.9 million will be reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss as a reduction of interest expense in fiscal year 2017.
The table below summarizes the effects of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for fiscal year 2016:
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) Amount of net gain (loss) reclassified into earnings Consolidated statement of operations classification Total effect on other comprehensive income (loss)
Interest rate swaps $
 2,181
 Interest expense (2,181)
Income tax effect 
 (882) Provision for income taxes 882
Net of income taxes $
 1,299
   (1,299)

The table below summarizes the effects of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for fiscal year 2015:
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) Amount of net gain (loss) reclassified into earnings Consolidated statement of operations classification Total effect on other comprehensive income (loss)
Interest rate swaps $
 2,140
 Interest expense (2,140)
Income tax effect 
 (867) Provision for income taxes 867
Net of income taxes $
 1,273
   (1,273)



- 73-



The table below summarizes the effects of derivative instruments in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income for fiscal year 2014:
Derivatives designated as cash flow hedging instruments Amount of gain (loss) recognized in other comprehensive income (loss) Amount of net gain (loss) reclassified into earnings Consolidated statement of operations classification Total effect on other comprehensive income (loss)
Interest rate swaps $(8,085) (4,108) Interest expense (3,977)
Income tax effect 3,269
 1,661
 Provision for income taxes 1,608
Net of income taxes $(4,816) (2,447)   (2,369)
(10) Other current liabilities
Other current liabilities at December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 consisted of the following (in thousands):
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Gift card/certificate liability$248,082
 239,531
Accrued payroll and benefits27,208
 26,544
Accrued interest13,086
 13,274
Other current liabilities—advertising funds48,089
 43,198
Franchisee profit-sharing liability14,184
 13,764
Other35,401
 53,042
Total other current liabilities$386,050
 389,353

 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
Gift card/certificate liability$207,628
 176,080
Gift card breakage liabilities13,301
 23,955
Accrued salary and benefits25,071
 29,540
Accrued legal liabilities (see note 17(d))5,555
 18,267
Accrued interest10,702
 9,522
Accrued professional costs2,170
 4,814
Franchisee profit-sharing liability11,083
 8,406
Other22,756
 22,275
Total other current liabilities$298,266
 292,859

The increase in the gift card/certificate liability is due primarily to an increase in, and timing of, gift card activations. The franchisee profit-sharing liability represents amounts owed to franchisees from the net profits primarily on the sale of Dunkin’ K-Cup® pods, and retail packaged coffee, and ready-to-drink bottled iced coffee in certain retail outlets.


- 74-

(11)


(10) Leases
The Company is theparty as a lessor and/or lessee on certain landto various leases (the Company leases the land and erects a building) or improved leases (lessor owns the land and building) coveringfor restaurants and other properties.properties, including land and buildings, as well as leases for office equipment and automobiles. In addition, the Company has leased and subleased land and buildings to others. Many of these leases and subleases provide for future rent escalation and renewal options. In addition, contingent rentals, determined as a percentage of annual sales by our franchisees, are stipulated in certain prime lease and sublease agreements. The Company is generally obligated for the cost of property taxes, insurance, and maintenance relating to these leases. Such costs are typically charged to the sublessee based on the terms of the sublease agreements. The Company also leases certain office equipment and a fleet of automobiles under noncancelable operating leases.
Included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets arewere the following amounts related to capital leasesoperating and finance lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities (in thousands):
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
Leased property under capital leases (included in property and equipment)$10,081
 9,457
Accumulated depreciation(4,055) (3,437)
Net leased property under capital leases$6,026
 6,020
Capital lease obligations:   
Current$589
 546
Long-term7,550
 7,497
Total capital lease obligations$8,139
 8,043


 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Consolidated balance sheet classification
Assets:    
Operating lease assets$371,264
 
Operating lease assets
Finance lease assets(a)
5,577
 5,264
Property, equipment, and software, net
Total lease assets$376,841
 5,264
 
Liabilities:    
Current:    
Operating lease liabilities$35,863
 
Operating lease liabilities
Finance lease liabilities594
 476
Other current liabilities
Long-term:    
Operating lease liabilities380,647
 
Operating lease liabilities
Finance lease liabilities7,145
 6,998
Other long-term liabilities
Total lease liabilities$424,249
 7,474
 

(a)Finance lease assets were recorded net of accumulated amortization of $3.8 million and $5.0 million as of December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively.
- 74-



Included in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets arewere the following amounts related to assets leased to others under operating leases, where the Company is the lessor (in thousands):
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
Land$38,695
 38,151
Buildings51,775
 52,285
Leasehold improvements147,799
 147,515
Store, production, and other equipment128
 150
Construction in progress2,789
 1,606
Assets leased to others, gross241,186
 239,707
Accumulated depreciation(104,298) (101,338)
Assets leased to others, net$136,888
 138,369

The weighted-average remaining lease term and weighted-average discount rate for operating and finance leases as of December 28, 2019 were as follows:
December 28,
2019
Weighted-average remaining lease term (years):
Operating leases11.9
Finance leases11.3
Weighted-average discount rate:
Operating leases4.6%
Finance leases20.5%



- 75-


 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
Land$32,646
 27,654
Buildings47,723
 43,196
Leasehold improvements149,027
 139,409
Store, production, and other equipment150
 221
Construction in progress567
 783
Assets leased to others, gross230,113
 211,263
Accumulated depreciation(86,957) (78,453)
Assets leased to others, net$143,156
 132,810

Future minimumLease costs and rental commitments to be paid and received by the Company at December 31, 2016 for all noncancelable leases and subleases areincome were as follows (in thousands):
 Payments Receipts 
Net
leases
 
Capital
leases
 
Operating
leases
 Subleases
Fiscal year:       
2017$1,567
 57,749
 (71,627) (12,311)
20181,602
 57,679
 (70,861) (11,580)
20191,431
 56,273
 (68,948) (11,244)
20201,223
 53,389
 (64,965) (10,353)
20211,257
 48,446
 (60,904) (11,201)
Thereafter11,593
 394,431
 (372,093) 33,931
Total minimum rental commitments18,673
 $667,967
 (709,398) (22,758)
Less amount representing interest10,534
      
Present value of minimum capital lease obligations$8,139
      
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
Finance lease cost: 
Amortization of lease assets(a)
$527
Interest on lease liabilities(b)
1,052
Total finance lease cost$1,579
  
Operating lease cost(c)
$58,856
Variable lease cost(c)
25,999
Short-term lease cost(c)
12,032
Rental income(d)
122,671
(a)Amortization of finance lease assets is included in depreciation in the consolidated statements of operations.
(b)Interest recognized on finance lease liabilities is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations.
(c)Operating and variable lease costs associated with franchised locations are included in occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants in the consolidated statements of operations. Operating, variable, and short-term lease costs for all other leases, including corporate facilities, automobiles, and other non-franchised assets are included in general and administrative expenses and advertising expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
(d)Rental income in the consolidated statements of operations primarily consists of sublease income. Lease income relating to variable lease payments was $47.9 million for the fiscal year ended December 28, 2019.

Rental expense under operating leases associated with franchised locations for fiscal years 2018 and company-operated locations2017 is included in occupancy expenses—franchised restaurants and company-operated restaurant expenses, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations. Rental expense under operating leases for all other locations, including corporate facilities, is included in general and administrative expenses net, in the consolidated statements of operations.operations for fiscal years 2018 and 2017. Total rental expense for all operating leases consisted of the following for fiscal years 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Base rentals$54,914
 55,019
Contingent rentals6,322
 6,664
Total rental expense$61,236
 61,683

 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Base rentals$54,517
 54,290
 53,130
Contingent rentals6,182
 6,348
 6,071
Total rental expense$60,699
 60,638
 59,201
Total rental income for all leases and subleases consisted of the following for fiscal year 2018 and 2017 (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Base rentals$74,419
 73,597
Contingent rentals29,994
 31,046
Total rental income$104,413
 104,643

 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Base rentals$70,962
 70,033
 67,945
Contingent rentals30,058
 30,389
 29,718
Total rental income$101,020
 100,422
 97,663

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
Operating cash flows from operating leases$58,138
Operating cash flows from finance leases1,052
Financing cash flows from finance leases459



- 75-76-



Future lease commitments to be paid and received by the Company as of December 28, 2019 were as follows (in thousands):
 Payments Receipts Net leases
 
Finance
leases
 
Operating
leases
 Subleases 
Fiscal year:       
2020$1,620
 53,650
 (67,546) (12,276)
20211,629
 56,026
 (68,621) (10,966)
20221,551
 53,225
 (63,212) (8,436)
20231,527
 48,085
 (54,677) (5,065)
20241,425
 44,110
 (48,330) (2,795)
Thereafter10,357
 303,986
 (280,974) 33,369
Total lease commitments18,109
 559,082
 (583,360) (6,169)
Less amount representing interest10,370
 142,572
    
Present value of lease liabilities$7,739
 416,510
    

As of December 28, 2019, the Company had certain executed real estate leases that had not yet commenced which are not reflected in the tables above. These leases are expected to commence between fiscal year 2020 and fiscal year 2025 with lease terms of 10 years to 20 years.
Future lease commitments to be paid and received by the Company as of December 29, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):
 Payments Receipts Net leases
 
Finance
leases
 
Operating
leases
 Subleases 
Fiscal year:       
2019$1,535
 60,166
 (72,751) (11,050)
20201,327
 58,389
 (69,704) (9,988)
20211,361
 56,107
 (66,154) (8,686)
20221,398
 51,968
 (60,282) (6,916)
20231,427
 46,340
 (51,532) (3,765)
Thereafter11,770
 329,641
 (304,954) 36,457
Total lease commitments18,818
 602,611
 (625,377) (3,948)
Less amount representing interest11,344
      
Present value of lease liabilities$7,474
      




(12)(11) Segment information
The Company is strategically aligned into two2 global brands, Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin-Robbins, which are further segregated between U.S. operations and international operations. Additionally, the Company administers and directs the development of all advertising and promotional programs in the U.S. As such, the Company has determined that it has four operating segments, which are its5 reportable segments: Dunkin’ Donuts U.S., Dunkin’ Donuts International, Baskin-Robbins U.S., Baskin-Robbins International, and Baskin-Robbins International.U.S. Advertising Funds. Dunkin’ Donuts U.S., Baskin-Robbins U.S., and Dunkin’ Donuts International primarily derive their revenues through royalty income and franchise fees. Baskin-Robbins U.S. also derives revenue through license fees from a third-party license agreement and rental income. Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. also derives revenue through rental income. Prior to the sale of remaining company-operated restaurants in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2016, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. also derived revenue through retail sales at company-operated restaurants. Baskin-Robbins International primarily derives its revenues from sales of ice cream products, as well as royalty income and franchise fees. U.S. Advertising Funds primarily derive revenues through continuing advertising fees from Dunkin’ and license fees.Baskin-Robbins franchisees. The operating results of each segment are regularly reviewed and evaluated separately by the Company’s senior management, which includes, but is not limited to, the chief executive officer. Senior management primarily evaluates the performance of its segments and allocates resources to them based on operating income adjusted for amortization of intangible assets, long-lived asset impairment charges, impairment of our joint ventures, and othercertain non-recurring, infrequent or unusual charges, which does not reflect the allocation of any corporate charges. This profitability


- 77-



measure is referred to as segment profit. When senior management reviews a balance sheet, it is at a consolidated level. The accounting policies applicable to each segment are generally consistent with those used in the consolidated financial statements.
Beginning in fiscal year 2016, certain segment profit amounts in the tables below have been reclassified as a result of the realignment of the Company’s organizational structure to better support its segment operations, including the allocation of previously unallocated costs. Additionally, revenues and segment profit amounts related to restaurants located in Puerto Rico were previously included in the Dunkin' Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments, but are now included in the Dunkin' Donuts U.S. and Baskin-Robbins U.S. segments based on functional responsibility. Prior year amounts in the tables below have been revised to reflect these changes for all periods presented.
Revenues for all operating segments include only transactions with unaffiliated customers and include no intersegment revenues. Revenues reported as “Other” include revenues earned through certain licensing arrangements with third parties in which our brand names are used, including the licensing fees earned from the Dunkin’ K-Cup® pod licensing agreement and sales of Dunkin’ branded ready-to-drink bottled iced coffee and retail packaged coffee, revenues generated from online training programs for franchisees, certain franchisee incentives, advertising fees and revenuesrelated income from international advertising funds, and breakage and other revenue related to the sale of Dunkin’ Donuts products in certain international markets,gift card program, all of which are not allocated to a specific segment. Revenues by segment were as follows (in thousands):
RevenuesRevenues
Fiscal year endedFiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.$607,964
 591,062
 548,871
Dunkin’ Donuts International22,903
 22,973
 19,693
Dunkin’ U.S.$646,094
 606,810
 587,033
Dunkin’ International26,748
 22,341
 19,770
Baskin-Robbins U.S.47,512
 47,140
 45,865
48,131
 47,418
 48,208
Baskin-Robbins International119,015
 117,076
 119,749
112,376
 115,367
 114,849
U.S. Advertising Funds473,644
 454,608
 440,441
Total reportable segment revenues797,394
 778,251
 734,178
1,306,993
 1,246,544
 1,210,301
Other31,495
 32,682
 14,531
63,234
 75,073
 65,250
Total revenues$828,889
 810,933
 748,709
$1,370,227
 1,321,617
 1,275,551
Revenues for foreign countries are represented by the Dunkin’ Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International segments above. NoNaN individual foreign country accounted for more than 10% of total revenues for any fiscal year presented.


- 76-



Amounts included in “Corporate”“Corporate and other” in the segment profit table below include corporate overhead costs, such as payroll and related benefit costs and professional services, net of “Other” revenues reported above. Segment profit by segment was as follows (in thousands):
Segment profitSegment profit
Fiscal year endedFiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.$466,976
 431,065
 404,657
Dunkin’ Donuts International9,658
 10,240
 9,478
Dunkin’ U.S.$490,193
 466,094
 445,118
Dunkin’ International18,065
 14,398
 6,167
Baskin-Robbins U.S.34,240
 29,289
 28,357
29,932
 31,958
 33,216
Baskin-Robbins International38,967
 36,218
 38,968
40,077
 36,189
 39,505
U.S. Advertising Funds
 
 
Total reportable segments549,841
 506,812
 481,460
578,267
 548,639
 524,006
Corporate(112,899) (161,934) (115,658)
Corporate and other(108,212) (114,046) (110,012)
Interest expense, net(100,270) (96,341) (67,824)(118,477) (121,548) (101,110)
Amortization of other intangible assets(22,079) (24,688) (25,760)(18,454) (21,113) (21,335)
Long-lived asset impairment charges(149) (623) (1,484)(551) (1,648) (1,617)
Loss on debt extinguishment and refinancing transactions
 (20,554) (13,735)(13,076) 
 (6,996)
Other losses, net(1,195) (1,084) (1,566)
Operating income adjustments excluded from reportable segments
 
 300
Other income (loss), net(235) (1,083) 391
Income before income taxes$313,249
 201,588
 255,733
$319,262
 289,201
 283,327


- 78-



Net income (loss) of equity method investments including amortization on investor-level intangible assets, is included in segment profit for the Dunkin’ Donuts International and Baskin-Robbins International reportable segments. Amounts reported as “Other” in the segment profit table below include the impairment charge recorded in fiscal year 2015 related to our investment in the Japan JV and the related reduction in depreciation and amortization, net of tax, as well as the reduction in depreciation and amortization, net of tax, reported by the South Korea JVour equity method investees as a result of thepreviously recorded impairment charge recorded in fiscal year 2011 (see note 6).charges. Net income (loss) of equity method investments by reportable segment was as follows (in thousands):
Net income (loss) of equity method investmentsNet income (loss) of equity method investments
Fiscal year endedFiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Dunkin’ Donuts International$622
 1,295
 1,794
Dunkin’ International$425
 (86) (83)
Baskin-Robbins International9,803
 10,535
 11,912
14,478
 11,711
 11,117
Total reportable segments10,425
 11,830
 13,706
14,903
 11,625
 11,034
Other4,127
 (53,575) 1,140
2,614
 3,278
 4,164
Total net income (loss) of equity method investments$14,552
 (41,745) 14,846
Total net income of equity method investments$17,517
 14,903
 15,198
Depreciation is reflected in segment profit for each reportable segment. Depreciation by reportable segmentssegment was as follows (in thousands):
DepreciationDepreciation
Fiscal year endedFiscal year ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Dunkin’ Donuts U.S.$11,378
 12,229
 12,207
Dunkin’ Donuts International27
 7
 11
Dunkin’ U.S.$10,590
 10,953
 11,296
Dunkin’ International26
 41
 31
Baskin-Robbins U.S.272
 358
 288
334
 282
 320
Baskin-Robbins International74
 60
 62
27
 12
 53
U.S. Advertising Funds5,495
 3,986
 3,820
Total reportable segments11,751
 12,654
 12,568
16,472
 15,274
 15,520
Corporate8,707
 7,902
 7,211
7,452
 8,644
 8,384
Total depreciation$20,458
 20,556
 19,779
$23,924
 23,918
 23,904

Depreciation related to the U.S. Advertising Funds is included within advertising expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.

- 77-



Property, equipment, and equipment,software, net by geographic region as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018 is based on the physical locations within the indicated geographic regions and are as follows (in thousands):
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018
United States$222,955
 209,106
International165
 96
Total property, equipment, and software, net$223,120
 209,202
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
United States$176,524
 182,456
International138
 158
Total property and equipment, net$176,662
 182,614

(13)(12) Stockholders’ deficit
(a) Common stock
Common sharesShares of common stock issued and outstanding included in the consolidated balance sheets include vested and unvested restricted shares. Common stock in the consolidated statements of stockholders’ deficit excludes unvested restricted shares.
(b) Treasury stock
During fiscal year 2014, the Company repurchased a total of 2,911,205 shares of common stock in the open market at a weighted average price per share of $44.71 from existing stockholders. The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method, and as such recorded an increase in treasury stock of $130.2 million during fiscal year 2014, based on the fair market value of the shares on the date of repurchase and direct costs incurred. During fiscal year 2014, the Company retired all outstanding shares of treasury stock, resulting in decreases in treasury stock and additional paid-in capital of $140.9 million and $33.2 million, respectively, and an increase in accumulated deficit of $107.8 million.
On February 5, 2015,2017, the Company entered into and completed an accelerated share repurchase agreement (the “February 2015“2017 ASR Agreement”) with a third-party financial institution. Pursuant to the terms of the February 20152017 ASR Agreement, the Company paid the financial institution $400.0$100.0 million in cash and received a delivery of 8,226,2971,757,568 shares of the Company’s common stock induring fiscal year 20152017 based on a weighted averageweighted-average cost per share of $48.62$56.90 over the term of the February 20152017 ASR Agreement.
On October 22, 2015,

- 79-



Additionally, during fiscal year 2017, the Company repurchased a total of 513,880 shares of common stock in the open market at a weighted-average cost per share of $52.90 from existing stockholders.
The Company accounts for treasury stock under the cost method based on the fair market value of the shares on the dates of repurchase plus any direct costs incurred. During fiscal year 2017, the Company retired 2,271,448 shares of treasury stock repurchased under the 2017 ASR Agreement and in the open market. The repurchase and retirement of these shares of treasury stock resulted in a decrease in additional paid-in capital of $18.9 million and an increase in accumulated deficit of $108.3 million.
In February 2018, the Company entered into antwo accelerated share repurchase agreementagreements (the “October 2015“February 2018 ASR Agreement”Agreements”) with atwo third-party financial institution.institutions. Pursuant to the terms of the October 2015February 2018 ASR Agreement,Agreements, the Company paid the financial institution $125.0institutions $650.0 million from cash on hand and received an initial delivery of 2,527,167deliveries totaling 8,478,722 shares of the Company’sCompany's common stock in October 2015,February 2018, representing an estimate of 80% of the total shares expected to be delivered under the October 2015February 2018 ASR Agreement.Agreements. Upon the final settlement of the October 2015February 2018 ASR AgreementAgreements in fiscal year 2016,August 2018, the Company received an additional delivery of 483,913deliveries totaling 1,691,832 shares of its common stock based on a weighted averageweighted-average cost per share of $41.51$63.91 over the term of the October 2015February 2018 ASR Agreement.Agreements.
Additionally, during fiscal year 2015,2018, the Company repurchased a total of 2,106,881458,465 shares of common stock in the open market at a weighted averageweighted-average cost per share of $47.47$65.44 from existing stockholders.
The Company recorded an increase in treasury stock of $600.0 million duringDuring fiscal year 2015 for2018, the Company retired 10,629,019 shares of treasury stock repurchased under the accelerated share repurchase agreementsFebruary 2018 ASR Agreements and in the open market, based on the fair market value of the shares on the dates of repurchase and direct costs incurred. Additionally, the Company recordedThe repurchase and retirement of these shares of treasury stock resulted in a decrease in additional paid-in capital of $25.0$81.2 million related to the remaining cash paid under the October 2015 ASR Agreement since the final settlement was not completed as of December 26, 2015, which upon settlement in fiscal year 2016, was reclassified from additional paid-in-capital to treasury stock. During fiscal year 2015, the Company retired 12,833,178 shares of treasury stock, resulting in decreases in treasury stock and additional paid-in capital of $599.0 million and $129.4 million, respectively, and an increase in accumulated deficit of $469.5$599.2 million.
On February 4, 2016, the Company entered into an accelerated share repurchase agreement (the “February 2016 ASR Agreement”) with a third-party financial institution. Pursuant to the terms of the February 2016 ASR Agreement, the Company paid the financial institution $30.0 million in cash and received 702,239 shares of the Company’s common stock inDuring fiscal year 2016 based on a weighted average cost per share of $42.72 over the term of the February 2016 ASR Agreement.
Additionally, during fiscal year 2016,2019, the Company repurchased a total of 520,631379,970 shares of common stock in the open market at a weighted averageweighted-average cost per share of $48.02$78.20 from existing stockholders.
The Companystockholders and recorded an increase in treasury stock of $80.0 million during fiscal year 2016 for$29.7 million.
Additionally, the Company retired 440,552 shares of treasury stock, inclusive of 379,970 shares repurchased under the accelerated share repurchase agreements and in the open market based on the fair market value of the shares on the dates of repurchase and direct costs incurred. During fiscal year 2016,incurred, as well as an additional 60,582 shares held in the Company retired 1,706,783Company's treasury. The retirement of these shares of treasury stock, resultingresulted in decreases in treasury stock and additional paid-in capital of $80.0$32.9 million and $15.9$3.0 million, respectively, and an increase in accumulated deficit of $64.1$29.9 million.


- 78-



(c) Accumulated other comprehensive loss
The changes in the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss were as follows (in thousands):

Effect of
foreign
currency
translation
 Unrealized gains (losses) on interest rate swaps Other 
Accumulated
other
comprehensive
loss
Balances at December 26, 2015$(20,459) 2,443
 (2,030) (20,046)
Other comprehensive loss(2,560) (1,299) (79) (3,938)
Balances at December 31, 2016$(23,019) 1,144
 (2,109) (23,984)

Effect of foreign currency translation Other 
Accumulated other
comprehensive loss
Balances at December 29, 2018$(14,307) (820) (15,127)
Other comprehensive loss(4,534) (148) (4,682)
Balances at December 28, 2019$(18,841) (968) (19,809)


- 80-



(d) Dividends
During fiscal year 2016,2019, the Company paid dividends on common stock as follows:
Dividend per share Total amount (in thousands) Payment dateDividend per share Total amount (in thousands) Payment date
Fiscal year 2016:     
Fiscal year 2019:     
First quarter$0.3000
 $27,395
 March 16, 2016$0.3750
 $30,975
 March 20, 2019
Second quarter0.3000
 27,456
 June 8, 20160.3750
 31,010
 June 12, 2019
Third quarter0.3000
 27,475
 August 31, 20160.3750
 31,042
 September 12, 2019
Fourth quarter0.3000
 27,377
 November 30, 20160.3750
 31,062
 December 11, 2019
During fiscal year 2015,2018, the Company paid dividends on common stock as follows:
Dividend per share Total amount (in thousands) Payment dateDividend per share Total amount (in thousands) Payment date
Fiscal year 2015:    
Fiscal year 2018:    
First quarter$0.2650
 $25,688
 March 18, 2015$0.3475
 $28,639
 March 21, 2018
Second quarter0.2650
 25,127
 June 17, 20150.3475
 28,800
 June 6, 2018
Third quarter0.2650
 25,197
 September 2, 20150.3475
 28,596
 September 5, 2018
Fourth quarter0.2650
 24,504
 December 2, 20150.3475
 28,793
 December 5, 2018
On February 9, 2017, we6, 2020, the Company announced that ourits board of directors approved an increase to the next quarterly dividend to $0.3225$0.4025 per share of common stock, payable on March 22, 201718, 2020 to shareholders of record as of the close of business on March 13, 2017.9, 2020.
(14)(13) Equity incentive plans
The Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. 2015 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2015 Plan”) was adopted in May 2015, and is the only plan under which the Company currently grants awards. A maximum of 6,200,000 shares of common stock may be delivered in satisfaction of awards under the 2015 Plan. Prior to the 2015 Plan, the Company granted awards under the Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. 2011 Omnibus Long-Term Incentive Plan (the “2011 Plan”) and the 2006 Executive Incentive Plan, as amended (the “2006 Plan”).
Total share-based compensation expense, which is included in general and administrative expenses, net, consisted of the following (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Time-vested stock options$6,476
 7,575
 8,611
Restricted stock units5,173
 4,569
 4,337
2011 Plan restricted shares3
 1,172
 701
Performance stock units2,390
 1,563
 1,277
Total share-based compensation$14,042
 14,879
 14,926
Total related tax benefit$7,438
 22,749
 8,339
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Time-vested stock options$10,654
 10,519
 6,978
Restricted stock units3,608
 3,408
 2,419
2011 Plan restricted shares1,793
 1,967
 1,456
Performance stock units1,086
 
 
Other40
 198
 434
Total share-based compensation$17,181
 16,092
 11,287
Total related tax benefit$6,955
 6,512
 4,567


- 79-




The actual tax benefit realized from stock options exercised during fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017 was $4.1$5.4 million, $13.1$24.7 million, and $11.5$11.1 million, respectively.
Time-vested stock options
Time-vested stock options granted under the 2006 Plan, 2011 Plan, and 2015 Plangenerally vest in equal annual amounts over either a 4- or 5-year period subsequent to the grant date, and as such are subject to a service condition, and also fully vest upon a change of control. The requisite service period over which compensation cost is being recognized is either 4 or 5 years. The maximum contractual term of the stock options is generally 7 or 10years.
The fair value of time-vested stock options werewas estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. This model is impacted by the Company’s stock price and certain assumptions related to the Company’s stock and employees’


- 81-



exercise behavior. The following weighted averageweighted-average assumptions were utilized in determining the fair value of the 2015 Plan options granted during fiscal year 2016years 2019, 2018, and the 2011 Plan2017:
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018 December 30, 2017
Weighted-average grant-date fair value of share options granted$12.54
 $10.44
 $9.87
Weighted-average assumptions:     
Risk-free interest rate2.5% 2.5% 1.9%
Expected volatility23.0% 23.0% 24.0%
Dividend yield2.1% 2.3% 2.3%
Expected term (years)3.96
 4.40
 4.88

The expected term for stock options granted during fiscal years 20152019 and 2014:
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Weighted average grant-date fair value of share options granted$7.41
 $8.66
 $10.65
Weighted average assumptions:     
Risk-free interest rate1.2% 1.5% 1.5%
Expected volatility25.0% 25.0% 26.3%
Dividend yield2.7% 2.2% 1.8%
Expected term (years)4.90
 4.91
 4.96
2018 was based on historical exercise behavior for similar awards, giving consideration to the contractual terms, vesting schedules, and expectations of future employee behavior. The expected term for stock options granted during fiscal year 2017 was primarily estimated utilizing the simplified method. We utilized the simplified method because the Company doesdid not have sufficient historical exercise data to provide a reasonable basis upon which to estimate expected term. The risk-free interest rate assumption was based on yields of U.S. Treasury securities in effect at the date of grant with terms similar to the expected term. Expected volatility was estimated based on the Company’s historical volatility, and also considering historical volatility of peer companies over a period equivalent to the expected term, as well as considering the Company’s historical volatility since its initial public offering.term. Additionally, the dividend yield was estimated based on dividends currently being paid on the underlying common stock at the date of grant. Estimated and actual forfeitures have not had a material impact on share-based compensation expense.
A summary of the status of the time-vested stock options as of December 31, 201628, 2019 and changes during fiscal year 20162019 is presented below:
 
Number of
shares
 
Weighted-average
exercise
price
 
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in millions)
Share options outstanding at December 29, 20182,996,136
 $51.71
 4.7  
Granted619,306
 72.28
    
Exercised(647,656) 47.37
    
Forfeited or expired(278,260) 59.92
    
Share options outstanding at December 28, 20192,689,526
 56.64
 4.3 $47.8
Share options exercisable at December 28, 20191,111,600
 49.79
 3.3 27.4
 
Number of
shares
 
Weighted
average
exercise
price
 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in millions)
Share options outstanding at December 26, 20154,249,758
 $44.18
 6.0  
Granted1,384,294
 44.35
    
Exercised(320,836) 31.27
    
Forfeited or expired(423,631) 47.04
    
Share options outstanding at December 31, 20164,889,585
 44.82
 5.3 $37.2
Share options exercisable at December 31, 20161,756,886
 42.22
 5.1 18.0

The total grant-date fair value of the time-vested options vested during fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 20142017 was $10.6$7.5 million, $7.4$8.2 million, and $4.6$9.9 million, respectively. The total intrinsic value of the time-vested stock options exercised was $5.3$19.1 million, $6.7$44.8 million, and $3.7$13.0 million for fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 2014,2017, respectively. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there was $15.7$11.4 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the time-vested stock options. Unrecognized compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted averageweighted-average period of approximately 2.32.4 years.
Restricted stock units
The Company typically grants restricted stock units to certain employees and non-employee members of our board of directors. Restricted stock units granted to employees generally vest in three equal installments on each of the first three annual anniversaries of the grant date. Restricted stock units granted to our non-employee members of our board of directors generally vest in one installment on the first anniversary of the grant date.




- 80-82-





A summary of the changes in the Company’s restricted stock units during fiscal year 20162019 is presented below:
 
Number of
shares
 Weighted-average grant-date fair value 
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in millions)
Nonvested restricted stock units at December 29, 2018159,882
 $55.19
 1.4  
Granted79,358
 71.87
    
Vested(95,246) 53.39
    
Forfeited(5,880) 56.79
    
Nonvested restricted stock units at December 28, 2019138,114
 65.96
 1.5 $10.3

 
Number of
shares
 Weighted average grant-date fair value 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in millions)
Nonvested restricted stock units at December 26, 2015138,347
 $45.42
 1.4  
Granted134,723
 44.34
    
Vested(77,571) 44.97
    
Forfeited(11,823) 44.07
    
Nonvested restricted stock units at December 31, 2016183,676
 44.91
 1.7 $9.6
The fair value of each restricted stock unit is determined on the date of grant based on our closing stock price, less the present value of expected dividends not received during the vesting period. The weighted-average grant-date fair value of restricted stock units granted during fiscal years 2019, 2018, and 2017 was $71.87, $60.87, and $52.44, respectively. As of December 31, 201628, 2019, there was $5.3$5.7 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock units, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted averageweighted-average period of approximately 2.01.8 years. The total grant-date fair value of restricted stock units vested during fiscal years 20162019, 20152018, and 20142017 was $3.5$5.1 million, $2.6$4.5 million, and $1.8$4.1 million, respectively.
2011 Plan restricted shares
During fiscal year 2014, the Company granted restricted shares of 27,096. The restricted shares vested in full on July 31, 2016 based on a service condition, and had a grant-date fair value of $51.67 per share, which was determined on the date of grant based on the Companys closing stock price. During fiscal year 2015, the Company granted restricted shares of 21,101. The restricted shares vest in equal installments in February 2018 and 2019 based on a service condition, and have a grant-date fair value of $47.39 per share, which was determined on the date of grant based on the Companys closing stock price. As of December 31, 2016, there was $528 thousand of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these restricted shares, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of approximately 2.1 years.
In addition, during fiscal year 2014, the Company granted 150,000 contingently issuable restricted shares. The contingently issuable restricted shares arebecame eligible to vest on December 31, 2018, subject to a service condition and a market vesting condition linked to the level of total shareholder return received by the Company’s shareholders during the performance period measured against the median total shareholder return of the companies in the S&P 500 Composite Index. The contingently issuable restricted shares were valued based on a Monte Carlo simulation model to reflect the impact of the total shareholder return market condition, resulting in a grant-date fair value of $37.94 per share. As of December 31, 2016, there was $2.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to these
During fiscal year 2019, the contingently issuable restricted shares which is expected to be recognized overrealized a period52.2% vesting percentage based upon the level of approximately 2.0 years.
As of December 31, 2016, 171,101 2011 Planperformance achieved against the market vesting condition, and 78,300 restricted shares remained unvested. The total grant-date fair value of restricted shares vested during fiscal year 2016 was $1.4 million.vested.
Performance stock units
The Company granted 121,03047,431, 67,993, and 84,705 performance stock units (“PSUs”) to certain employees during fiscal year 2016,years 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, which are generally eligible to cliff-vest approximately three years from the grant date. Of the total PSUs granted 39,684in 2019, 2018, and 2017, 20,681, 30,974, and 37,027 PSUs, respectively, are subject to a service condition and a market vesting condition linked to the level of total shareholder return received by the Companys shareholders during the performance period measured against the companies in the S&P 500 Composite Index (“TSR PSUs”). The remaining 81,34626,750, 37,019, and 47,678 PSUs granted in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively, are subject to a service condition and a performance vesting condition based on the level of adjusted operating income growth achieved over the performance period (“AOI PSUs”). The maximum vesting percentage that could be realized for each of the TSR PSUs and the AOI PSUs is 200% based on the level of performance achieved for the respective awards. All of the PSUs are also subject to a one-year post-vesting holding period. The TSR PSUs were valued based on a Monte Carlo simulation model to reflect the impact of the total shareholder return market condition, resulting in a weighted averageweighted-average grant-date fair value of $55.36$86.97, $65.52, and $67.52 per share.unit granted in 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively. The probability of satisfying a market condition is considered in the estimation of the grant-date fair value for TSR PSUs and the compensation cost is not reversed if the market condition is not achieved, provided the requisite service has been provided. The AOI PSUs granted in 2019, 2018, and 2017 have a weighted averageweighted-average grant-date fair value of $44.22$69.19, $57.10, and $52.44 per share.unit, respectively. Total compensation cost for the AOI PSUs is determined based on the most likely outcome of the performance condition and the number of awards expected to vest based on the outcome.




- 81-83-





A summary of the changes in the Company’s PSUs during fiscal year 20162019 is presented below:
 
Number of
shares
 Weighted-average grant-date fair value 
Weighted-average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in millions)
Nonvested performance stock units at December 29, 2018194,569
 $55.07
 1.1  
Granted(a)
68,940
 61.77
    
Vested(44,040) 28.32
    
Forfeited(b)
(46,927) 50.26
    
Nonvested performance stock units at December 28, 2019172,542
 62.35
 1.1 $12.8

 
Number of
shares
 Weighted average grant-date fair value 
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual
term (years)
 
Aggregate
intrinsic
value
(in millions)
Granted121,030
 $47.87
    
Forfeited(7,989)
 47.51
    
Nonvested performance stock units at December 31, 2016113,041
 47.90
 2.3 $5.9
(a)Includes 21,509 incremental TSR PSUs granted in fiscal year 2016 that vested in fiscal year 2019 at greater than 100% of target based on performance.
(b)Includes forfeiture of 29,982 PSUs that did not achieve 100% of performance target at vesting.
As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, there was $3.9$3.5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to PSUs, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted averageweighted-average period of approximately 2.31.8 years. The total grant-date fair value of PSUs vested during fiscal year 2019 was $1.2 million. No PSUs vested in fiscal years 2018 or 2017.
(15)(14) Earnings per Share
The computation of basic and diluted earnings per share of common sharestock is as follows (in thousands, except for share and per share amounts)data):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Net income—basic and diluted$242,024
 229,906
 271,209
Weighted-average number of shares of common stock:     
Common—basic82,809,017
 83,697,610
 90,857,168
Common—diluted83,674,613
 84,960,791
 92,231,436
Earnings per share of common stock:     
Common—basic$2.92
 2.75
 2.99
Common—diluted2.89
 2.71
 2.94
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands—basic and diluted$195,576
 105,227
 176,357
Weighted average number of common shares:     
Common—basic91,568,942
 96,045,232
 105,398,899
Common—diluted92,538,282
 97,131,674
 106,705,778
Earnings per common share:     
Common—basic$2.14
 1.10
 1.67
Common—diluted2.11
 1.08
 1.65

The weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of common sharesstock in the common diluted earnings per share calculation includes the dilutive effect of 969,340, 1,086,442,865,596, 1,263,181, and 1,306,8791,374,268 equity awards for fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 2014,2017, respectively, using the treasury stock method. The weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of common sharesstock in the common diluted earnings per share calculation for all periods excludes all contingently issuable equity awards outstanding for which the contingent vesting criteria were not yet met as of the fiscal period end. As of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, December 26, 2015,29, 2018, and December 27, 201430, 2017, there were 40,403, 184,744, and 150,000 restricted shares, respectively, related to equity awards that were contingently issuable and for which the contingent vesting criteria were not yet met as of the fiscal period end. Additionally, the weighted averageweighted-average number of shares of common sharesstock in the common diluted earnings per share calculation excludes 3,498,229, 2,985,215,645,362, 726,203, and 1,373,3791,382,486 equity awards for fiscal years 2016, 2015,2019, 2018, and 2014,2017, respectively, as they would be antidilutive.


- 84-

(16)


(15) Income taxes
Income before income taxes was attributed to domestic and foreign taxing jurisdictions as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Domestic operations$297,522
 266,080
 261,760
Foreign operations21,740
 23,121
 21,567
Income before income taxes$319,262
 289,201
 283,327
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Domestic operations$286,927
 234,410
 231,549
Foreign operations26,322
 (32,822) 24,184
Income before income taxes$313,249
 201,588
 255,733


- 82-




The components of the provision for income taxes were as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Current:     
Federal$52,508
 43,992
 102,349
State26,683
 21,270
 27,922
Foreign4,304
 3,930
 3,094
Current tax provision$83,495
 69,192
 133,365
Deferred:     
Federal$(4,832) (7,262) (117,054)
State(1,500) (2,967) (5,900)
Foreign75
 332
 1,707
Deferred tax benefit(6,257) (9,897) (121,247)
Provision for income taxes$77,238
 59,295
 12,118

Tax Reform
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. federal government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act significantly changed U.S. tax law by, among other things, reducing the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, establishing a modified territorial-style system for taxing foreign-source income of domestic multinational corporations, and imposing a one-time mandatory transition tax on deemed repatriated earnings of certain foreign joint ventures and subsidiaries. As a result of the Tax Act, the Company recorded a provisional net tax benefit of $96.8 million during fiscal year 2017 primarily related to the remeasurement of certain U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities, partially offset by the tax effects associated with mandatory repatriation.
During fiscal year 2018, all of the Company’s 2017 U.S. federal and state tax returns were filed and the provisional net tax benefit from the Tax Act was finalized. There was no material change to the provisional amount recorded in fiscal year 2017.


- 85-


 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Current:     
Federal$97,972
 90,586
 82,925
State28,430
 23,694
 23,146
Foreign3,808
 3,186
 (1,262)
Current tax provision$130,210
 117,466
 104,809
Deferred:     
Federal$(9,983) (19,034) (22,644)
State(3,152) (3,060) (1,861)
Foreign598
 987
 (134)
Deferred tax benefit(12,537) (21,107) (24,639)
Provision for income taxes$117,673
 96,359
 80,170

Tax Rate
The provision for income taxes from continuing operations differed from the expense computed using the statutory federal income tax rate of 21% for each of the fiscal years 2019 and 2018 and 35% for fiscal year 2017 due to the following:
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Computed federal income tax expense, at statutory rate21.0 % 21.0 % 35.0 %
State income taxes6.6
 6.6
 5.2
Benefits and taxes related to foreign operations(1.7) (1.5) (1.7)
Excess tax benefits from share-based compensation(1.5) (6.8) (2.8)
Change in valuation allowance(0.4) 0.6
 3.2
Other permanent differences0.3
 0.6
 (0.5)
Impact of Tax Act
 
 (34.9)
Other, net(0.1) 
 0.8
Effective tax rate24.2 % 20.5 % 4.3 %

 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Computed federal income tax expense, at statutory rate35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0 %
Impairment of investment in Japan JV
 9.4
 
State income taxes5.1
 6.6
 5.7
Benefits and taxes related to foreign operations(2.7) (4.4) (3.5)
Conversion of foreign subsidiary
 
 (3.3)
Other permanent differences0.1
 0.6
 0.1
Changes in enacted tax rates and apportionment
 
 0.1
Uncertain tax positions
 
 (2.5)
Other, net0.1
 0.6
 (0.3)
Effective tax rate37.6 % 47.8 % 31.3 %
The increase in the effective tax rate for fiscal year 2015 resulting from the impairment of our investment in the Japan JV resulted from the corresponding reduction in income before income taxes but for which there is no corresponding tax benefit.
During fiscal year 2014, the Company recorded a net tax benefit of $7.0 million related to the reversal of reserves for uncertain tax positions, including interestDeferred Tax Assets and penalties, net of federal and state tax benefit as applicable, for which settlement with the taxing authorities was reached or were otherwise deemed effectively settled. Additionally during fiscal year 2014, the Company recorded a net tax benefit of $8.5 million related to the restructuring of our Canadian subsidiaries, which included a legal entity conversion of Dunkin’ Brands Canada, Ltd. (“DBCL”) to a British Columbia unlimited liability company. The net tax benefit from the Canadian legal entity conversion resulted primarily from a worthless securities deduction for the tax basis of DBCL and the revaluation of DBCL’s deferred tax assets and liabilities at the applicable U.S. deferred tax rate, partially offset by income recognized for the tax basis of DBCL’s assets.


- 83-



Liabilities
The components of deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows (in thousands):
 December 28, 2019 December 29, 2018
 
Deferred tax
assets
 
Deferred tax
liabilities
 
Deferred tax
assets
 
Deferred tax
liabilities
Allowance for doubtful accounts$2,687
 
 2,134
 
Finance leases2,178
 
 2,074
 
Rent
 6,308
 9,332
 
Property, equipment, and software1,652
 
 1,984
 
Deferred compensation liabilities8,341
 
 10,789
 
Deferred gift cards and certificates17,737
 
 17,402
 
Deferred revenue110,069
 
 111,668
 
Real estate reserves
 
 980
 
Franchise rights and other intangibles
 360,664
 
 368,277
Unused net operating losses and foreign tax credits1,924
 
 3,270
 
Other current liabilities4,764
 
 5,581
 
Interest limitation carryforward6,649
 
 5,134
 
Operating lease assets
 101,843
 
 
Operating lease liabilities115,727
 
 
 
Compensation2,924
 
 
 
Other1,281
 
 162
 
 275,933
 468,815
 170,510
 368,277
Valuation allowance(1,352) 
 (2,827) 
Total$274,581
 468,815
 167,683
 368,277

 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
 
Deferred tax
assets
 
Deferred tax
liabilities
 
Deferred tax
assets
 
Deferred tax
liabilities
Allowance for doubtful accounts$2,685
 
 4,484
 
Capital leases3,295
 
 3,256
 
Rent11,905
 
 10,132
 
Property and equipment
 1,977
 419
 
Deferred compensation liabilities19,900
 
 15,155
 
Deferred gift cards and certificates27,874
 
 20,909
 
Deferred income12,609
 
 12,064
 
Real estate reserves1,264
 
 1,060
 
Franchise rights and other intangibles
 551,679
 
 559,332
Unused net operating losses and foreign tax credits11,457
 
 14,233
 
Other current liabilities5,368
 
 7,708
 
Capital loss336
 
 162
 
Other1,422
 
 
 337
 98,115
 553,656
 89,582
 559,669
Valuation allowance(1,131) 
 (793) 
Total$96,984
 553,656
 88,789
 559,669
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are presented on a net basis by jurisdiction in the consolidated balance sheets. Deferred tax assets for certain foreign jurisdictions totaling $5.1 million and $5.6$3.4 million as of each of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015, respectively,29, 2018 are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2016, the Company had $8.5 million of unused foreign tax credits, which expire in fiscal years 2021 through 2026. At December 31, 2016,28, 2019, the Company had net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards in certain international jurisdictions of approximately $7.1$6.5 million, and $1.1 million, respectively, and recorded deferred tax assets of $1.1$0.8 million, and $0.2 million, respectively, net of valuation allowance, related to such loss carryforwards. All unused net operating losses, capital losses, and interest limitations may be carried forward indefinitely, subject to certain restrictions on their use. In addition, the Company had $0.4 million of foreign tax credit carryforwards that expire in 2029 on which a full valuation allowance has been recorded.


- 86-



In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income, and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income, and projections for future taxable income over the periods for which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes, as of December 31, 201628, 2019, with the exception of a foreign tax credit carryforward and net operating loss and capital loss carryforwards attributable to certain of our foreign subsidiaries for which valuation allowances have been recorded, it is more likely than not that the Company will realize the benefits of the deferred tax assets.
The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability of $7.7$11.8 million for potential foreign withholding taxes on the undistributed earnings, of foreign operations, net of foreign tax credits, relating to our foreign joint ventures that arose in fiscal year 20162019 and prior years because the Company currently does not expect those unremitted earnings to reversebe distributed and become taxable to the Company in the foreseeable future. In addition, the previously untaxed accumulated earnings and profits of our joint ventures were subject to U.S. tax in the one-time mandatory transition tax provision in fiscal year 2017. A deferred tax liability will be recognized when the Company is no longer able to demonstrate that it plans to indefinitely reinvest undistributed earnings. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, the undistributed earnings of these joint ventures were approximately $132.9$179.4 million and $128.2$159.6 million, respectively.
The Company has not recognized a deferred tax liability of $13.3 million for the undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries since the previously untaxed accumulated earnings and profits of those subsidiaries were subject to tax in the one-time mandatory transition tax provision in fiscal year 2017. Beginning in fiscal year 2018, the income from these subsidiaries is considered global intangible low-taxed income and a portion of those earnings are included in taxable income in the year earned. In addition, such earnings are considered indefinitely reinvested outside the United States. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, the amount of cash associated with indefinitely reinvested foreign earnings was approximately $24.5$19.3 million and $18.3$22.7 million, respectively. If in the future we decide to repatriate such foreign earnings, we could incur incremental U.S. federal and state income tax. However, our intentintention is to keep these funds indefinitely reinvested outside of the United States and our current plans do not demonstrate a need to repatriate them to fund our U.S. operations.
Unrecognized Tax Benefits
At December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, the total amount of unrecognized tax benefits related to uncertain tax positions was $2.3$1.3 million and $2.7$2.4 million,, respectively. At December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, the Company had approximately $1.1$0.8 million and $1.3$0.7 million,, respectively, of accrued interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions. During fiscal year 2018, the Company recorded an uncertain tax position of $1.1 million due to uncertainty in the application of provisions of the Tax Act. During fiscal year 2019, regulations were issued by U.S. Treasury which clarified the new provisions related to foreign tax credit. Accordingly, the uncertain tax position was released during 2019. The Company recorded net income tax benefits of $0.2 million and $2.3 million during fiscal years 2016 and 2014,


- 84-



respectively, and net income tax expense of $0.1 million during fiscal year 2015 fordid not record a material amount related to potential interest and penalties related tofor uncertain tax positions. At positions during fiscal years 2019, 2018, or 2017. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, there werewas $1.3 million and $1.1$1.2 million,, respectively, of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would impact the annual effective tax rate.
The Company’s major tax jurisdictionsjurisdiction subject to income tax areis the United States, and Canada. For Canada, the Company has open tax yearswhere periods dating back to tax years ended December 20102016 remain open and finalized its audit for the tax periods 2009 through 2012 during fiscal year 2014. In the United States, the Company has open tax years dating backsubject to tax years ended December 2013 and have been audited by the IRS through fiscal 2010. The Company is currently under audit in limited jurisdictions for tax years beginning after December 2010.examination.
A summary of the changes in the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Balance at beginning of year$2,392
 1,529
 2,290
Increases related to prior year tax positions
 3
 206
Increases related to current year tax positions
 1,121
 65
Decreases related to prior year tax positions(1,124) (170) (94)
Decreases related to settlements
 
 (871)
Lapses of statutes of limitations
 
 (140)
Effect of foreign currency adjustments43
 (91) 73
Balance at end of year$1,311
 2,392
 1,529



- 87-
 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Balance at beginning of year$2,653
 3,672
 8,213
Increases related to prior year tax positions267
 
 488
Increases related to current year tax positions161
 111
 96
Decreases related to prior year tax positions(33) (301) (4,567)
Decreases related to settlements(191) (636) (296)
Lapses of statutes of limitations(597) 
 
Effect of foreign currency adjustments30
 (193) (262)
Balance at end of year$2,290
 2,653
 3,672

(17)


(16) Commitments and contingencies
(a) Lease commitments
The Company is party to various leases for property, including land and buildings, leased automobiles, and office equipment under noncancelable operating and capitalfinance lease arrangements (see note 11)10).
(b) Supply chain guarantees
The Company has entered into various supply chain agreements that provide for purchase commitments,with suppliers of franchisee products, the majority of which result incontain guarantees by the Company being contingently liable upon early terminationrelated to franchisees' purchases of certain volumes of products over specified periods. The Company’s guarantees decrease as franchisees purchase products over the respective terms of the agreement.agreements. The guarantees have varying terms, many of which are one year or less, and the latest of which expires in 2022. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, the Company was contingently liable under such supply chain agreements for approximately $136.2$100.9 million and $157.8$119.4 million,, respectively. For certain supply chain commitments, as product is purchased by the Company’s franchisees over the term of the agreement, the amount of the guarantee is reduced. The Company assesses the risk of performing under each of these guarantees on a quarterly basis, and, based on various factors including internal forecasts, prior history, and ability to extend contract terms, wethe Company accrued an immaterialinconsequential amount of reserves related to supply chain commitmentsguarantees as of December 31, 2016, which is included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. There was no accrual required as of28, 2019 and December 26, 2015 related to these commitments.29, 2018.
(c) Letters of credit
At As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018, the Company had standby letters of credit outstanding for a total of $25.933.1 million and $26.332.4 million, respectively. There were no0 amounts drawn down on these letters of credit.
(d) Legal matters
In May 2003, a group of Dunkin’ Donuts franchisees from Quebec, Canada filed a lawsuit against the Company on a variety of claims, including but not limited to, alleging that the Company breached its franchise agreements and provided inadequate management and support to Dunkin’ Donuts franchisees in Quebec (the “Bertico litigation”). In June 2012, the Quebec Superior Court found for the plaintiffs and issued a judgment against the Company in the amount of approximately C$16.4 million, plus costs and interest, representing loss in value of the franchises and lost profits. The Company appealed the decision, and in April 2015, the Quebec Court of Appeals (Montreal) ruled to reduce the damages to approximately C$10.9 million, plus costs and interest. Similar claims have also been made against the Company by other former Dunkin’ Donuts franchisees in Canada. As a result of the Bertico litigation appellate ruling and assessment of similar claims, the Company reduced its aggregate legal reserves for the Bertico litigation and similar claims by approximately $2.8 million during fiscal


- 85-



year 2015, which is recorded within general and administrative expenses, net in the consolidated statements of operations. During fiscal year 2016, the Company reached a final agreement on costs and interest with the plaintiffs in the Bertico litigation, and paid approximately C$17.4 million with respect to this matter, which represented the full amounts owed to the plaintiffs.
Additionally, the Company is engaged in several matters of litigation arising in the ordinary course of its business as a franchisor. Such matters include disputes related to compliance with the terms of franchise and development agreements, including claims or threats of claims of breach of contract, negligence, and other alleged violations by the Company. At December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015, contingent liabilities totaling $5.6 million and $18.3 million, respectively, were included in other current liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets29, 2018, an inconsequential amount was accrued related to reflect the Company’s estimate of the probable losses which may be incurred in connection with all outstanding litigation.
(18)(17) Retirement plans
401(k) Plan
Employees of the Company, excluding employees of certain international subsidiaries, and certain employees of company-operated stores, are eligible to participate in a defined contribution retirement plan, the Dunkin’ Brands 401(k) Retirement Plan (“401(k) Plan”), under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Under the 401(k) Plan, employees may contribute up to 80% of their pre-tax eligible compensation, not to exceed the annual limits set by the IRS. The 401(k) Plan allows the Company to match participants’ contributions in an amount determined at the sole discretion of the Company. The Company matched participants’ contributions during fiscal years 20162019, 20152018, and 20142017, up to a maximum of 4% of the employee’s eligible compensation. Employer contributions totaled $3.33.4 million for fiscal year 2016 and $3.2 million for each of the fiscal years 20152019 and 2014.2017, and $3.5 million for fiscal year 2018.
NQDC Plans
The Company also offers certain qualifying individuals, as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), the ability to participate in the NQDC Plans. The NQDC Plans allow for pre-tax contributions of up to 50% of a participant’s base annual salary and other forms of compensation, as defined. The Company credits the amounts deferred with earnings and holds investments in company-owned life insurance policies to partially offset the Company’s liabilities under the NQDC Plans. The NQDC Plans liability, included in other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets, was $11.17.2 million and $9.19.8 million at December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 201529, 2018, total investments held for the NQDC Plans were $9.3$12.4 million and $5.89.9 million, respectively, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheets.
Canadian Pension Plan
The Company sponsored a contributory defined benefit pension plan in Canada, The Baskin-Robbins Employees’ Pension Plan (“Canadian Pension Plan”), which provided retirement benefits for the majority of its Canadian employees.

During fiscal year 2012, the Company’s board of directors approved a plan to close the Peterborough, Ontario, Canada manufacturing plant, where the majority of the Canadian Pension Plan participants were employed. As a result of the closure, the Company terminated the Canadian Pension Plan in fiscal year 2012, and the Financial Services Commission of Ontario approved the termination of the plan in fiscal year 2014. During fiscal year 2015, the Company completed the final settlement of the plan by funding the plan deficit and distributing substantially all plan assets through lump-sum distributions to participants and the purchase of annuities. The settlement of the Canadian Pension Plan resulted in the recognition of a loss of $4.1 million, which was reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss to general and administrative expenses, net during fiscal year 2015.- 88-

(19)


(18) Related-party transactions
The Company recognized royalty incomerevenues from its equity method investees, consisting of royalty income and sales of ice cream and other products, as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal year ended
 December 28,
2019
 December 29,
2018
 December 30,
2017
Japan JV$1,346
 1,874
 1,745
South Korea JV4,987
 4,569
 4,525
Australia JV3,746
 6,002
 4,242
 $10,079
 12,445
 10,512

 Fiscal year ended
 December 31,
2016
 December 26,
2015
 December 27,
2014
Japan JV$1,873
 1,378
 1,790
South Korea JV4,030
 4,288
 4,602
Spain JV
 68
 123
 $5,903
 5,734
 6,515


- 86-



At As of December 31, 201628, 2019 and December 26, 2015,29, 2018, the Company had $1.1$3.7 million and $5.5 million, respectively, of royalties receivablereceivables from its equity method investees, which were recorded in accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, in the consolidated balance sheets.
The Company made net payments to its equity method investees totaling approximately $3.23.8 million in during each of the fiscal years 20162019 and 2015,2018 and $2.6$3.3 million induring fiscal year 2014,2017, primarily for the purchase of ice cream products.
As of December 26, 2015, the Company had $2.1 million of notes receivable from the Spain JV, which were fully reserved, and are included in other assets in the consolidated balance sheet. Upon sale of the Company's ownership interest in the Spain JV in fiscal year 2016 (see note 6), the Company recovered approximately $1.0 million in notes receivable repayments.
During fiscal years 2016, 2015, and 2014, the Company recognized sales of ice cream and other products of $4.3 million, $4.0 million, and $5.8 million, respectively, in the consolidated statements of operations from the sale of ice cream products to the Australia JV. As of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, the Company had $2.6 million and $3.1 million, respectively of net receivables from the Australia JV, consisting of accounts and notes receivable, net of current liabilities.
(20)(19) Allowance for doubtful accounts
The changes in the allowance for doubtful accounts were as follows (in thousands):
 
Accounts
receivable
 
Short-term notes and other
receivables
 Long-term notes and other
receivables
Balance at December 31, 2016$4,778
 339
 2,088
Provision for doubtful accounts, net123
 264
 70
Write-offs and other(968) 
 (335)
Balance at December 30, 20173,933
 603
 1,823
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net606
 281
 (256)
Write-offs and other(955) 
 (81)
Balance at December 29, 20183,584
 884
 1,486
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net2,931
 (153) 84
Write-offs and other18
 47
 (31)
Balance at December 28, 2019$6,533
 778
 1,539
 
Accounts
receivable
 
Short-term notes and other
receivables
 Long-term notes and other
receivables
Balance at December 28, 2013$2,599
 659
 2,808
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net1,796
 (14) 1,039
Write-offs and other(513) 633
 100
Balance at December 27, 20143,882
 1,278
 3,947
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net3,705
 (117) (245)
Write-offs and other(1,960) (154) 373
Balance at December 26, 20155,627
 1,007
 4,075
Provision for (recovery of) doubtful accounts, net1,202
 (189) (960)
Write-offs and other(2,051) (479) (1,027)
Balance at December 31, 2016$4,778
 339
 2,088

(21)(20) Quarterly financial data (unaudited)
Three months endedThree months ended
March 26,
2016
 June 25,
2016
 September 24,
2016
 December 31,
2016
March 30,
2019
 June 29,
2019
 September 28,
2019
 December 28,
2019
(In thousands, except per share data)(In thousands, except per share data)
Total revenues$189,776
 216,309
 207,099
 215,705
$319,091
 359,337
 355,882
 335,917
Operating income85,333
 106,141
 109,360
 113,880
101,372
 122,652
 121,343
 105,683
Net income attributable to Dunkin’ Brands37,154
 49,590
 52,712
 56,120
Net income52,323
 59,622
 72,365
 57,714
Earnings per share:              
Common—basic0.41
 0.54
 0.58
 0.61
0.63
 0.72
 0.87
 0.70
Common—diluted0.40
 0.54
 0.57
 0.61
0.63
 0.71
 0.86
 0.69




- 87-89-





 Three months ended
 March 31,
2018
 June 30,
2018
 September 29,
2018
 December 29,
2018
 (In thousands, except per share data)
Total revenues$301,342
 350,640
 350,011
 319,624
Operating income89,831
 113,850
 111,592
 96,559
Net income50,152
 60,498
 66,067
 53,189
Earnings per share:       
Common—basic0.58
 0.73
 0.80
 0.64
Common—diluted0.57
 0.72
 0.79
 0.64

 Three months ended
 March 28,
2015
 June 27,
2015
 September 26,
2015
 December 26,
2015
 (In thousands, except per share data)
Total revenues$185,905
 211,424
 209,807
 203,797
Operating income83,740
 92,588
 99,763
 43,476
Net income (loss) attributable to Dunkin’ Brands25,631
 42,318
 46,216
 (8,938)
Earnings (loss) per share:       
Common—basic0.26
 0.44
 0.49
 (0.10)
Common—diluted0.25
 0.44
 0.48
 (0.10)




Item 9.Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureDisclosure.
None.
Item 9A.Controls and Procedures.
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)), that are designed to ensure that information that would be required to be disclosed in Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision, and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, such disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

During the fiscal year ended December 28, 2019, we adopted new lease guidance. We implemented internal controls to ensure we adequately evaluated our leases and properly assessed the impact of the new guidance to facilitate the adoption. Additionally, we implemented new business processes, internal controls, and modified information technology systems to assist in the ongoing application of the new guidance.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process, designed by, or under the supervision of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by the Company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Internal control over financial reporting includes maintaining records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect our transactions and disposition of assets; providing reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary for preparation of our financial statements; providing reasonable assurance that receipts and expenditures are made only in accordance with management and board authorizations; and providing reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting is not intended to provide absolute assurance that a misstatement of our financial statements would be prevented or detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or that the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate.



- 90-



Management, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 201628, 2019 based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013), issued by the Committee of Sponsoring


- 88-



Organizations of the Treadway Commission. This evaluation included review of the documentation of controls, evaluation of the design effectiveness of controls, testing of the operating effectiveness of controls, and a conclusion on this evaluation. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.28, 2019.

Our independent registered public accounting firm, KPMG LLP, audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, as stated in their report which appears herein.




- 89-91-





Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


TheTo the Stockholders and Board of Directors and Stockholders
Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.:
Opinion on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.andInc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,28, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.Commission. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 28, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 28, 2019 and subsidiaries’December 29, 2018, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ deficit, and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 28, 2019, and the related notes (collectively, the consolidated financial statements), and our report dated February 24, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.
Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting.Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control–Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income, stockholders’ equity (deficit), and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2016, and our report dated February 21, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.


/s/ KPMG LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
February 21, 201724, 2020




- 90-92-





Item 9B.Other InformationInformation.
None.


- 93-



PART III
Item 10.Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate GovernanceGovernance.
Information about our Executive Officers of the Registrant

Set forth below is certain information about our executive officers. Ages are as of February 21, 2017.24, 2020.


Nigel Travis, David Hoffmann, age 67, has served as52, was named Chief Executive Officer of Dunkin’ Brands since January 2009 and assumed the additional role of Chairman of the Board in May 2013. From 2005 through 2008,July 2018. Mr. Travis servedHoffmann joined Dunkin’ Brands in October 2016 as President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Chief Executive Officer, and on the board of directors of Papa John’s International, Inc., a publicly-traded international pizza chain. Prior to Papa John’s, Mr. Travis was with Blockbuster, Inc. from 1994 to 2004, where he served in increasing roles of responsibility, including President and Chief Operating Officer. Mr. Travis previously held numerous senior positions at Burger King Corporation. Mr. Travis currently serves as a Director of Office Depot, Inc. and formerly served on the board of Lorillard, Inc.

Paul Carbone, age 50, was named Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer on June 4, 2012. Prior to that, Mr. Carbone had served as Vice President, Financial Management of Dunkin’ Brands since 2008.Canada. Prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, he most recentlyMr. Hoffmann served as President, High Growth Markets, for McDonald’s Corporation. Mr. Hoffmann served as an executive for McDonald’s Corporation for 19 years in increasing areas of responsibility, including Senior Vice President and Chief FinancialRestaurant Support Officer for Tween Brands, Inc. Before Tween Brands, Mr. Carbone spent seven years with Limited Brands, Inc., where his roles includedAPMEA, Vice President Finance,of Strategy, Insights and Development for Victoria’s Secret. Mr. Carbone serves on the boardAPMEA and of directorsExecutive Vice President of Snap Fitness, a global franchisor of fitness facilities, as well as the National DCP, LLC, the Dunkin’ Donuts franchisee-owned purchasing and distribution cooperative.McDonald’s Japan.


Jack Clare, age 46,49, was appointed Chief Information and Strategy Officer in March 2015. Mr. Clare joined Dunkin’ Brands in July 2012, and prior to his current position, he served as Chief Information Officer. Prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, Mr. Clare served as Vice President, IT and Chief Information Officer for Yum! Restaurants International, where he had responsibility for the IT strategy for more than 14,000 restaurants in over 120 countries, primarily for the KFC, Pizza Hut and Taco Bell brands. Before Yum!, Mr. Clare spent seven years with Constellation Brands, most recently as their Vice President, Technical Services. He also spent three years with Sapient Corporation in various IT management roles and 7 years on active duty as an officer in the U.S. Air Force.


Richard Emmett,Katherine Jaspon, age 61, 43, was named Chief LegalFinancial Officer on June 5, 2017 after serving in that position on an interim basis since April 7, 2017. Ms. Jaspon joined the Company in December 2005 as Assistant Controller, and served as Vice President, Finance and Treasury from September 2014 until her promotion to CFO. Prior to that, she served as Vice President, Accounting, and Controller since 2010 and assumed the responsibilities of Corporate Treasurer in December 2011. She previously served as an audit senior manager at KPMG LLP and is a licensed certified public accountant.

Stephanie Lilak, age 50, was named Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer in July 2019. Prior to joining Dunkin' Brands, Ms. Lilak spent 23 years with General Mills Inc., in roles of increasing responsibility. She served as Vice President, Human Resources for the North America Retail Segment from January 2014, and prior2015 until July 2019. Prior to that served asrole, Ms. Lilak was the Vice President, Human Resources of the Convenience and Food Service Segment from September 2013 until January 2015.

Jason Maceda, age 51, was named Senior Vice President, Baskin-Robbins U.S. and General Counsel since joining Dunkin' BrandsCanada in December 2009. Mr. Emmett joinedJuly 2017. A twenty-two year employee of Dunkin’ Brands, from QCE HOLDING LLC (Quiznos) where heMr. Maceda most recently served as Executivethe Company’s Vice President Chief Legal Officerof U.S. Financial Planning and Secretary.Corporate Real Estate. Mr. Maceda has held several leadership positions in the Dunkin’ Brands Finance Department. Prior to Quiznos,Dunkin’ Brands, he held a supervisory position in the finance department of Davol Inc., a subsidiary of C.R. Bard Inc., a multi-national manufacturer of healthcare products. He began his career in public accounting with Ernst & Young. Mr. Emmett served in various roles including as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary for Papa John’s International. Mr. Emmett currentlyMaceda also serves on the board of directors of Francesca’s Holdings Corporation, is a member of Francesca’s audit committee,Good Times Restaurants Inc.

David Mann, age 57, joined the Company in March 2019 as Senior Vice President, Chief Legal Officer and servesCorporate Secretary. Mr. Mann worked at Marriott International, Inc. (a global hospitality company) from 1995 until March 2019, most recently serving as Chair of that company’s compensation committee. In addition, Mr. Emmett serves on the board of directors of the International Franchise Association.

David Hoffmann, age 49, joined Dunkin’ Brands in October 2016 as President, Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. and Canada. Prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, Mr. Hoffmann served as President, High Growth Markets, for McDonald’s Corporation. Mr. Hoffmann served as an executive for McDonald’s Corporation for 19 years in increasing areas of responsibility, including Senior Vice President and Restaurant Support Officer for APMEA,Deputy General Counsel, and prior to that role, serving as Senior Vice President of Strategy, Insights and DevelopmentAssociate General Counsel for APMEAthe Americas Transactions and of Executive Vice President of McDonald’s Japan.Corporate Affairs group.


Bill MitchellScott Murphy, age 52, joined Dunkin’ Brands in August 2010, and currently serves as47, was named President, Dunkin' Brands International.Americas in December 2019. Prior to his current appointment, Mr. MitchellMurphy served as President, Baskin-RobbinsChief Operating Officer, Dunkin' U.S. from January 2018 until December 2019, and Canada, and Dunkin' Donuts and Baskin-Robbins China, Japan and South Korea.prior to that, Mr. Mitchell joined Dunkin’ Brands from Papa John’s International, where he hadMurphy served in a variety of roles since 2000, including President of Global Operations, President of Domestic Operations, Operations VP, Division VP and Senior VP of Domestic Operations. Prior to Papa John’s, Mr. Mitchell was with Popeyes, a division of AFC Enterprises where he served in various capacities including Senior Director of Franchise Operations.

Scott Murphy, age 44, currently serves as Senior Vice President, Operations, Dunkin' Donuts U.S. and Canada. Mr. Murphy joined Dunkin’ Brands in 2004 and prior to his current position,previously served as Senior Vice President and Chief Supply Officer. Mr. Murphy’s prior experience includes 10 years of global management consulting with A.T. Kearney. Mr. Murphy serveshas served on the board of directors of Oath Craft Pizza, the National Coffee Association of America, and previously served on the board of directors of the International Food Service Manufacturers Association and the National DCP, LLC.



- 91-




Karen Raskopf, age 62,65, joined Dunkin’ Brands in 2009 and currently serves as Senior Vice President and Chief Communications and Sustainability Officer. Prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, she spent 12 years as Senior Vice President, Corporate Communications for Blockbuster, Inc. She also served as head of communications for 7-Eleven, Inc. Ms. Raskopf is Co-Chair of the Board of Directors of the Dunkin' Joy in Childhood Foundation.


Paul Twohig

- 94-



John Varughese, age 63, joined Dunkin’ Donuts U.S. in October 2009 and has announced his retirement as President, Dunkin' Donuts U.S. and Canada in March 2017. Prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, Mr. Twohig served as a Division54, was named Senior Vice President, for Starbucks Corporation from December 2004 to March 2009.International of Dunkin’ Brands in November 2018. Mr. Twohig also previously served as Chief Operating Officer for Panera Bread Company.

Weldon Spangler, age 51, was appointed Senior Vice President, Baskin-Robbins U.S. and Canada in October 2015. Mr. SpanglerVarughese joined Dunkin’ Brands in 2010,2002 and prior to his current position, he served as Vice President, Dunkin’ Donuts Operations U.S.International and Canada. Prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, Mr. Spangler held various leadership positions with Starbucks Corporation and immediately prior to joining Dunkin’ Brands, Mr. Spangler was a Divisionthat, as Vice President, for Knowledge Universe, an education services firm.Baskin-Robbins International Operations and Managing Director of Baskin-Robbins Worldwide.


The remaining information required by this item will be contained in our definitive Proxy Statement for our 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed not later than 120 days after the close of our fiscal year ended December 31, 201628, 2019 (the “Definitive Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 11.Executive CompensationCompensation.
The information required by this item will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12.Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder MattersMatters.
The information required by this item will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13.Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director IndependenceIndependence.
The information required by this item will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14.Principal Accounting Fees and ServicesServices.
The information required by this item will be contained in the Definitive Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.




- 92-95-





PART IV
Item 15.Exhibits, Financial Statement SchedulesSchedules.
(a)The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1.Financial statements: All financial statements are included in Part II, Item 8 of this report.
2.Financial statement schedules: All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required or are not applicable, or the required information is provided in the consolidated financial statements or notes described in Item 15(a)(1) above.
3.Exhibits:
Exhibit
Number
 Exhibit Title
   
 
   
 Form of Second
   
4.2 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   


- 96-



 
   
 
   


- 93-



 
   
 First Amended and Restated
10.15*Amendment No. 1 to First Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between Dunkin’ Brands, Inc., Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and Nigel TravisDavid Hoffmann dated July 11, 2018 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s CurrentCompany's Quarterly Report on Form 8-K,Form10-Q, File No. 001-35258, filed with the SEC on December 3, 2012)November 7, 2018)
   
10.16* Amendment No. 2 to First Amended and Restated Executive Employment Agreement between Dunkin’ Brands, Inc., Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc. and Nigel Travis (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, File No. 001-35258, filed with the SEC on March 5, 2014)
10.17*
   
10.18* 
10.19*Offer Letter to William Mitchell dated August 2, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 to Amendment No. 1 to the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10K/A for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011, File No. 001-35258, filed with the SEC on March 16, 2012)
10.20*Offer Letter to Paul Carbone dated June 4, 2012 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.19 to the Company’sCompany's Annual Report on Form 10-K, File No. 001-35258, filed with the with SEC on February 22, 2013)26, 2019)
   
10.21* Form of amendment
   
10.22* Restricted Stock Award Agreement of Nigel Travis,
   
10.23* Executive Stock Option Award of Paul Twohig,
   
10.24 
   
10.25 
   
10.26 
   
10.27 
   
10.28 
   
10.29 
   


- 94-



10.30 
   


- 97-



10.31
 
   
10.32 
   
10.33 
   
10.34 
   
10.35 
   
10.36* Executive Restricted Stock Award - Paul Carbone (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.24 to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, File No. 001-35258, filed with the SEC on May 6, 2015)
10.37*
   
10.38* 
   
21.1 Subsidiaries of Dunkin’ Brands Group, Inc.
   
23.1 Consent of KPMG LLP
   
31.1 
   
 
   
 
   
 
   
101 The following financial information from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,28, 2019, formatted in Extensible Business Reporting Language, (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit), (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements


- 98-



104Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document)
*Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement
Item 16. Form 10-K Summary
Item 16.Form 10-K Summary.
None.






- 95-99-





SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
Date: February 21, 201724, 2020
 DUNKIN’ BRANDS GROUP, INC.
   
 By:/s/ Nigel TravisDavid Hoffmann
 Name:Nigel TravisDavid Hoffmann
 Title:Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature Title Date
     
/s/ Nigel TravisDavid Hoffmann Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) February 21, 201724, 2020
Nigel TravisDavid Hoffmann   
     
/s/ Paul CarboneKatherine Jaspon Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) February 21, 201724, 2020
Paul CarboneKatherine Jaspon
/s/ Nigel TravisNon-Executive Chairman & DirectorFebruary 24, 2020
Nigel Travis   
     
/s/ Raul Alvarez Director February 21, 201724, 2020
Raul Alvarez    
     
/s/ Irene Chang Britt Director February 21, 201724, 2020
Irene Chang Britt    
     
/s/ Anthony DiNovi Director February 21, 201724, 2020
Anthony DiNovi    
     
/s/ Michael Hines Director February 21, 201724, 2020
Michael Hines
/s/ Sandra HorbachDirectorFebruary 21, 2017
Sandra Horbach    
     
/s/ Mark Nunnelly Director February 21, 201724, 2020
Mark Nunnelly    
     
/s/ Carl Sparks Director February 21, 201724, 2020
Carl Sparks    
/s/ Linda BoffDirectorFebruary 24, 2020
Linda Boff
/s/ Roland SmithDirectorFebruary 24, 2020
Roland Smith