Table of Contents



UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, DC 20549
 
FORM 10-K
 
 
xANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 201630, 2017
or 
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
for the transition period from                     to                     .
Commission file number: 001-34507 
VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)   
Delaware 11-3664322
(State or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation or Organization)
 
(IRS Employer
Identification No.)
300 Harmon Meadow Blvd.
Secaucus, New Jersey 07094
(Addresses of Principal Executive Offices, including Zip Code)
(201) 868-5959
(Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Class Name of the exchange on which registered
Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share New York Stock Exchange
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None 
 
 
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    ¨  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.    ¨  Yes    x  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    x  Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    x  Yes    ¨  No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ¨x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filerx
¨

   Accelerated filer¨x
Non-accelerated filer
¨ 
 (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company¨
Emerging growth company¨
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    ¨  Yes    x  No
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting and non-voting common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $717,583,499$274,373,029 as of June 25, 2016,July 1, 2017, the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based on the closing price of the common stock on the New York Stock Exchange.
As of January 28, 2017,27, 2018, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. had 23,424,95624,203,144 shares of common stock outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III of this report, to the extent not set forth herein, is incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement to be filed for the 20172018 Annual Meeting of the Stockholders.



Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Page
   
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
 
   
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
 
   
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
 
   
Item 15.
Table of Contents

EX 10.6510.52
EX 10.53
EX 21.1
EX 23.1
EX 31.1
EX 31.2
EX 32.1
EX 32.2
 
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT





Table of Contents

Forward-Looking Statements
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking” statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including, without limitation, statements regarding future financial results and performance, future business prospects, implementation of omni-channel retailing, revenue, stores, our ability to implement strategic initiatives, realize improved financial results and meet market expectations, our ability to identify efficiencies and cost reduction opportunities and realize the benefits of potential savings, share and debt repurchases, product offerings, contract manufacturing, supply chain network utilization, intellectual property, integration of acquisitions, store transformation costs, future inventory charges, potential charges related to Nutri-Force, estimated costs to open a new distribution center, working capital, liquidity, capital expenditures, interest costs, industry based factors, including the level of competition in the vitamin, mineral and supplement industry, continued demand from the primary markets Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (the “Company” or “we”) serves, consumer perception of our products, the availability of raw materials, as well as economic conditions generally and factors more specific to the Company such as compliance with manufacturing, healthcare, environmental and other regulations, changes in accounting standards, certifications and practices and restrictions imposed by the Company’s Convertible Notes and our Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below), including financial covenants and limitations on the Company’s ability to incur additional indebtedness and the Company’s future capital requirements, and other risks, uncertainties and factors set forth under Item 1A., entitled “Risk Factors” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. You can identify these forward-looking statements by the use ofthose that contain words such as “outlook”, “believes”, “expects”, “potential”, “continues”, “may”, “will”, “should”, “seeks”, “predicts”, “intends”, “plans”, “estimates”, “anticipates”, “target”, “could” or the negative version of these words or other comparable words.
These statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside our control, including, among others, product liability claims and recalls, the availability of insurance, the strength of the economy, changes in the overall level of consumer spending, the performance of the Company’sCompany's products within the prevailing retail environment, implementation of our strategy, trade restrictions, changes in tax policy, regulatory restrictions, political environment, international operations, availability of suitable store locations at appropriate terms, new credit card technology, e-commercethe availability of raw materials, compliance with regulations, certifications and best practices with respect to the development, manufacture, sales and marketing of the Company's products, management changes, maintaining appropriate levels of inventory, changes in tax policy, ecommerce relationships, disruptions of manufacturing, warehouse or distribution facilities or information systems, political environment and other specific factors discussed herein and in other Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”"SEC") filings by us (including our reports on Forms 10-K and 10-Q filed with the SEC).
We believe that all forward-looking statements are based on reasonable assumptions when made; however, we caution that it is impossible to predict actual results or outcomes or the effects of risks, uncertainties or other factors on anticipated results or outcomes with certainty and that, accordingly, one should not place undue reliance on these statements. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date when made and we undertake no obligation to update these statements in light of subsequent events or developments. Actual results may differ materially from anticipated results or outcomes discussed in any forward-looking statement.
Electronic Access to Company Reports
Our investor website can be accessed at www.vitaminshoppe.com under “Investor Relations”. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed with or furnished to the SEC pursuant to Section 13(a) or Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our investor website under the caption “SEC Filings” promptly after we electronically file those materials with, or furnish those materials to, the SEC. No information contained on any of our websites is intended to be included as part of, or incorporated by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Information relating to corporate governance at our Company, including our Corporate Governance Guidelines, our Standards of Business Conduct for all directors, officers, and employees, and information concerning our directors, Committees of the Board, including Committee charters, and transactions in Company securities by directors and executive officers, is available at our investor website under the captions “Corporate Governance” and “SEC Filings”. Paper copies of these filings and corporate governance documents are available to stockholders free of charge by written request to Investor Relations, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., 300 Harmon Meadow Blvd., Secaucus, New Jersey 07094. Documents filed with the SEC are also available on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov.

Table of Contents

PART I
Unless the context requires otherwise, references in this Annual Report on Form 10-K to “VSI”, the “Company”, “we”, “us” and “our” collectively refer to Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary, Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. (“VS Industries”) and the wholly owned subsidiaries of VS Industries. References to “Fiscal” or “Fiscal Year” mean the fifty-two weeks ended December 30, 2017, the fifty-three weeks ended December 31, 2016 and the fifty-two weeks ended December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 for Fiscal Year 2016,2017, Fiscal Year 20152016 and Fiscal Year 2014,2015, respectively, and references to “Fiscal” and “Fiscal Year” for other years are similarly based on a fifty-two week or fifty-three week fiscal year, as applicable.
Item 1.        Business
Overview of our Company
We are a multi-channelan omni-channel specialty retailer and contract manufacturer of vitamins, minerals, herbs, specialty supplements, sports nutrition and other health and wellness products. We market approximately 900 nationally recognized brands as well as our own brands, which include The Vitamin Shoppe®Shoppe®, BodyTech®BodyTech®, True Athlete®Athlete®, Mytrition®Mytrition®, plnt®plnt®, ProBioCare®ProBioCare®, Next Step® Step® and Betancourt Nutrition®Nutrition®. We believe we offer one of the largest varieties of products among vitamin, mineral and supplement (“VMS”) retailers and continue to refine our assortment with approximately 7,000 stock keeping units (“SKUs”) offered in our typical store and approximately 10,000 additional SKUs available through e-commerce. Our broad product offering enables us to provide our customers with a depth of selection of products that may not be readily available at other specialty retailers or mass merchants, such as discount stores, supermarkets, drugstoresdrug stores and wholesale clubs. We believe our product offering and emphasis on product knowledge and customer service helps us meet the needs of our target customer and serves as a foundation for enhancing strong customer loyalty.
We sellcontinue to focus on our productsstrategy to improve the customer experience through three operating segments: retail, directthe roll-out of initiatives including increasing customer engagement and manufacturing. In our retail segment, which includes Vitamin Shoppe and Super Supplements retail store formats, we have leveraged our store economic model by opening a total of 137personalization, redesigning the omni-channel experience (including in stores from the beginning of Fiscal Year 2014 through Fiscal Year 2016. As of December 31, 2016, we operated 775 stores located in 45 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico, primarily located in retail centers and stand alone locations. In our direct segment, we sell our products directly to consumersas well as through the internet primarily at www.vitaminshoppe.com. Our e-commerce sites complementand mobile devices), growing our in-store experience by extending our retail product offerings and enable us to access customers outside our retail markets and those who prefer to shop online. Our manufacturing segment provides custom manufacturing and private labeling of VMS products, and develops and markets our own branded products for both sales to third parties and for the VSI product assortment.
During Fiscal 2015, the Company began development of a strategic plan focused on upgrading our customers’ experience across our retail and e-commerce channels, the “reinvention strategy”. The Company worked with outside consultants to analyze qualitative and quantitative information relevant to our customers’ experience. The reinvention strategy is focused on upgrading the customer experience to inspire our target customers with changes to curate our product assortment, opportunities to increase private brands penetration, enhancements to the in-store and digital experience, store layout, as well as changes to improveimproving the effectiveness of pricing and promotions. As part of this strategy, we have developed several initiatives, including a new remodeled store format that is being piloted in 20 stores as of December 30, 2017, which includes a new layout, revised product assortment and other instore experiences (hereafter referred to as "transformations"). In addition, we remain committed to innovation at the store level and we have been rolling out two key elements of new category innovation with our loyaltynew Kombucha bar on tap and Fit Freezer / Cooler section to over 80 stores in Fiscal 2017.
In 2017, competitive trends have intensified, such as broader channel availability of supplement products, more aggressive competitor pricing and promotional strategies, and significantly increased expenditures in marketing by our competitors. Our operations have been negatively impacted, resulting in lower customer traffic and a reduction in net sales during Fiscal 2017. During Fiscal 2017 we have tested and launched several initiatives including new pricing and promotional strategies and a customer auto-delivery subscription program. The Company incurred approximately $9.0 millionWe also increased our marketing expense beginning in the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. We anticipate these initiatives will mitigate some of the negative performance we have experienced in areas such as customer traffic.
We continue to identify and implement opportunities to improve efficiencies and reduce costs in key areas including sourcing of inventory and cost savings opportunities related to selling, general and administrative expenses. For Fiscal 2017, the Company realized incremental year over year cost of goods sold savings of approximately $15.0 million and selling, general and administrative expenses savings of approximately $4.0 million, for a total savings of $19.0 million. During Fiscal 2017, the Company renegotiated rent expenses with a number of landlords resulting in lower occupancy costs duringof $9.5 million over the remaining lease periods, or approximately $0.9 million on average per year through 2027.
Impairment of long-lived assets:
In Fiscal 2016 in connection with2017, the reinvention,Company recorded impairment charges on the goodwill of its retail segment of 210.6 million, of which approximately $6.0$177.2 million of such costs are expected to be on-going. These costs include additional internal resources, improvements to store network connectivity, and outside consultants.was not deductible for income tax purposes. The Company is inalso recorded an impairment charge on the processVitamin Shoppe tradename of testing several initiatives and expects to realize improved financial results from the reinvention beginning in$59.4 million during Fiscal 2017. In addition, we have engaged a consulting firmthe Company recognized store impairment charges of $4.8 million during Fiscal 2017 on fixed assets related to 34 of its underperforming retail locations still in use.
Manufacturing turnaround:
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016 to identify other efficiencies and cost reduction opportunities focusing on product sourcing, store operations, pricing and promotions, and corporate expenses. During Fiscal 2016, we incurred $3.8 millionthe Company recorded impairment charges of costs in connection with identifying other efficiencies and cost reduction opportunities. As a result of this cost reduction project, we have identified savings potential with an estimated value of at least $24.0$32.6 million on an annualized basis.
Ingoodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of FDC Vitamins, LLC d/b/a Nutri-Force Nutrition (“Nutri-Force”), a subsidiary of VS Industries, as our manufacturing operations continued to perform below expectations. During the first quarter of Fiscal 2015, we also performed a review of certain business operations. As part of this review,2017, the Company implemented changesengaged outside consultants to more closely align Super Supplements stores with current processesperform an assessment of the operations of Nutri-Force and assortments in the Vitamin Shoppe retail stores. As a result, net costs of $1.8 million and $1.0 million were incurred during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2016, respectively. Annual cost savings resulting from these actions are estimated to be $1 million to $2 million. In addition, the Company decided to cease operations in Canada, and as a result net costs of $0.9 million and $1.9 million were incurred in Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2016, respectively. The annual cost savings related to ceasing operations in Canada are estimated to be approximately $1.0 million. Costs for these two initiatives include lease liabilities, markdown charges on inventory and employee severance.

Table of Contents

assist in the development of initiatives required to turnaround this business unit. These initiatives were focused on improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes, eliminating unprofitable SKUs, reducing third-party customers, and reducing costs. The implementation of this plan began during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017 and has been substantially completed in Fiscal 2017. As a result, the Company incurred costs of approximately $12.3 million during Fiscal 2017 related to the turnaround of Nutri-Force including inventory charges, consulting expenses and other related charges.
The Company is currently exploring strategic alternatives related to Nutri-Force, including the potential sale of this subsidiary. Refer to Long-Lived Assets section of our Critical Accounting Policies included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Closing of distribution center:
In August 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration. Distribution operations have been transitioned to the Company's other distribution centers. Costs related to this closure, such as severance, inventory related costs and other charges, were $3.1 million in Fiscal 2017. As a result of this closure, the Company anticipates annualized savings between $4.0 million to $5.0 million upon lease expiration.
Segment Information
We have increased our focus on customer centric initiatives and being an omni-channel retailer. As initiatives, including "buy online and pickup in store" and subscription sales, continue to develop, the interrelationship among the ways customers can purchase products from the Company results in sales that are generated and fulfilled across multiple channels. The Company has revised its internal management structure and reporting to align with our omni-channel strategy. We believe the historical structure of separate segments for retail stores and e-commerce is no longer representative of the way the business is managed. As a result, beginning in Fiscal 2017, the Company has updated its segment reporting to better align with its omni-channel strategy. These changes resulted in a single retail segment that includes fulfilled in store and direct to consumer sales channels. In addition, certain costs previously classified as corporate costs, such as retail and direct management costs, are allocated to the retail operating segment. Segment results related to prior periods have been restated to conform with this omni-channel structure.
Based upon the revised structure of the Company, we operate through threetwo business segments: retail, which includes Vitamin Shoppe and Super Supplements retail store formats direct, which consists ofand our e-commerce formats, and manufacturing, which consists of the Nutri-Force manufacturing operations. For additional information, refer to Note 15, “Segment and Product Data” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Retail.Through our retail store formats, we believe we differentiate ourselves in the VMS industry. What makes us unique is our broad selection of VMS products and our stores are staffed with trained and knowledgeable employees, who we refer to as Health Enthusiasts®Enthusiasts®, and who are able to inform our customers about product features and assist in product selection.
Since the beginning of Fiscal 2014 through Fiscal 2016, we have opened 137 stores, expanding our presence in our existing markets as well as entering new markets. In Fiscal 2017, the rate of new store growth and remodeling of existing stores is being further evaluated as part of the reinvention. In addition, our new stores since the beginning of Fiscal 2013 are approximately 2,900 square feet compared to the average of our total store portfolio of approximately 3,500 square feet.
Direct. We also sell our products directly to consumers through the internet, primarily at www.vitaminshoppe.com. Our e-commerce sites complement our in-store experience by extending our retail product offerings with approximately 10,000 additional SKUs that are not available in our stores and enable us to access customers outside our retail markets and those who prefer to shop online.
Manufacturing.Through Nutri-Force, we provide custom manufacturing and private labeling of VMS products and develop and market our own branded products for both the VSI product assortment and sales to third parties and for the VSI product assortment.parties.
In conjunction with the Company’s reinvention, we are increasing our focus on customer centric initiatives toward becoming an omni-channel based retailer. As recently launched initiatives, including buy online pickup in store and subscription sales, continue to develop, the interrelationship among the ways customers can purchase products from VSI results in sales that are generated and fulfilled across multiple channels. We believe the historical structure of separate segments for retail stores and e-commerce will no longer be representative of our operating performance. As a result, beginning in Fiscal 2017, the Company will be updating its segment reporting to better align with its omni-channel strategy. These changes include combining the current retail and direct operating segments into one retail operating segment. In addition, certain costs currently classified as corporate costs, such as retail and direct management costs, will be allocated to the retail operating segment. VSI has revised its internal management structure to align with our omni-channel strategy.
Industry
The VMS industry is large, estimated to be approximately $41$44 billion in 20162017 according to the Nutrition Business Journal (“NBJ”), we. We believe the industry is fragmented, and continued growth is expected as health and wellness trends continue. According to the NBJ, the VMS industry is expected to register a CAGR of 6.2% from 20162017 to 2020.2021. Sports supplements and meal replacement categories are projected to post the highest CAGRs at 8.3%8.6% and 7.3%7.9%, respectively.
Increased focus on healthy diet and nutrition, along with growing fitness and wellness program participation, serves as a positive trend for the nutritional supplements industry. Retailers of VMS products primarily include specialty retailers and mass merchants, such as discount stores, supermarkets, drugstoresdrug stores and wholesale clubs. The specialty retailers typically cater to the more sophisticated VMS customer by focusing on selection and customer service, while the mass merchants generally offer a limited assortment comprised of more mainstream products with less customer service. NBJ anticipates that the specialty retail channel will grow at an average rate of 6.5%5.5% through 2020.2021. Additionally, NBJ forecasts the internet channel to grow at an average rate of 10.2%12.0% from 20162017 to 2020.2021.
Table of Contents

Although long-term prospects noted above suggest continued growth, recent trends have created volatility in the near term and we expect continued volatility. Recent industry trends have been mixed, driven in part by the prospects of more federal and state involvement in the industry. A lack of clarity on regulation appears to be dissuading manufacturers from investing in and developing new ingredients/products. Additionally, negative publicity about the nutritional supplement industry has increased over the past few years and adds further uncertainty to the fundamental outlook. With product innovation remaining slower than in past years, and negative headlines/media at heightened levels, VMS industry headwinds appear poised to persist over the near term.
Table of Contents

Over recent years, there has been a shift of market share from specialty retailers to other channels such as mass market retailers, supermarkets, club chains, drugstoredrug store chains and e-commerce companies. This broaderIn 2017, competitive channel availability of VMS products representstrends have intensified, including more aggressive competitor pricing and promotional strategies and significantly increased expenditures in marketing by our competitors. These competitive trends represent a challenge for VSI to keep pace with industry growth rates.
Industry and market data contained or incorporated by reference in this Form 10-K were obtained through company research, surveys and studies conducted by third parties and industry and general publications or based on our experience in the industry. We have not independently verified market and industry data from third-party sources.
Competitive Strengths
We believe there is an opportunity to capitalizeposition the Vitamin Shoppe as a leading Health and Wellness authority capitalizing on the attractive VMS industry dynamics and we plan to further developthe overall market for wellness. We believe the following competitive strengths as part ofform the foundation of our reinvention strategy:
Omni-Channel Retailer. We are an omni-channel retailer, distributing products in a variety of ways including our retail stores, our e-commerce sites and our mobile application. This business model affords us multiple touch points of interaction with our customers, which allows us to gather data and communicate with them in person, through our call center and via the internet. In 2017, we accelerated our omni-channel focus to take advantage of changes in the evolving customer decision journey in the wellness market.
Value-Added Customer Service.Service. We believe we offer a high degree of customer service. We place a strong emphasis on employee training and customer service, and view our Health Enthusiasts as a source for health and wellness information while assisting our customers with their product selections. In addition, we have also launched new products and services, such as our SPARK Auto Delivery, that make it easier for our customers to maintain their VMS regimen.
Product Selection, Including a Strong Assortment of Private Brands.BrandsWe believe we have a broad merchandise assortment.assortment and are consistently working to add new and exciting products. We are working closely with our vendor partners to introduce innovative and unique products to further differentiate us from the competition. We complement our assortment with our private brands merchandise which accounted for approximately 21%22% of our net sales (excluding Nutri-Force net sales) in Fiscal 2016.2017.
Attractive Customer Base.BaseWe have a large base of customers who proactively manage their health and wellness through the use of vitamins and supplements. In Fiscal 2016, 86%2017, 88% of our net sales (excluding Nutri-Force net sales) were attributable to our Healthy Awards customers. Our no-fee Healthy Awards Program promotes brand loyalty among our customers and allows our customers to earn points redeemable for future purchases, approximately 66%62% of which were redeemed in Fiscal 2016.2017. We also utilize our Healthy Awards Program database to track customer purchasing patterns across our retail and direct business segments,segment, analyze market and industry trends and create targeted merchandising and marketing strategies. InOur loyalty program is a vehicle to enhance our customer relationships management approach via personalized emails, content and offers. Beginning in Fiscal 2016, we announcedthe Company implemented enhancements to thisits loyalty program, including the issuance of credit certificates on a quarterly basis.basis compared with the annual issuances under the previous program. Further enhancements are planned to be rolled out in Fiscal 2018.
Highly Refined Real Estate Strategy.Locations.  We apply demanding criteria to our retail site selection. We locate our stores primarily in attractive stand-alone locations or endcap (corner) positions in retail centers. We believe that the location and visibility of our real estate is an important component of our customer acquisition strategies.
Multi-Channel Retailer. We are a multi-channel retailer, distributing products through our retail stores and our e-commerce sites, enabling us to access customers outside our retail markets and those who prefer to shop online. This business model affords us multiple touch points of interaction with our customers, which allows us to gather data and communicate with them in person, through our call center and via the internet.
Experienced Management Team with Proven Track Record.. We have assembled a management team across a broad range of disciplines with extensive experience in building leading national specialty retailers.
Business Strategy
We intend to pursue the following key strategies in order to execute our reinvention strategy:
Upgrading our Customers’ Shopping Experience – We are focusing on enhancing both our in-store and digital experience. This will include improvements to our store layout, the remodeling of stores, changes to our product assortment, increasing the penetration of private brands and continuing to enhance the features and functionality of our e-commerce sites and providing our customers with a more personalized shopping experience;
Building Relationships – To enhance relationships with our customers including improving the utilization of our Health Enthusiasts, customer relationship management program, website and mobile functionality, in order to personalize our relationship and gain a greater share of their discretionary spending;
Store and Comparable Sales Growth – To increase sales and profitability of our existing store base as well as continue opening new stores in the future. We are further evaluating changes to our store format in order to enhance our customers’ shopping experience;
Cost Reduction Initiatives To improve operating performance through initiatives focused on reducing costs in areas such as product sourcing, promotions and various other reductions to selling, general and administrative expenses;
Private Brands – We are focused on the development of new private brands and the extension of existing private brands to establish a point of differentiation for our customers; and
Vertical integration – The acquisition of the manufacturing operations of Nutri-Force allows us to better control the production and timing of new product introductions and should enhance profitability. We intend to focus on increasing
Table of Contents

Business Strategy
Our New Base Plan is based on the following principles:
1) Obsessive focus on our Customers’ needs by deeply understanding how they shop through a fresh view of the Wellness Customer Decision Journey;
2) Embracing the digital transformation that is sweeping through retail and society and realigning all our channels to take advantage of the changes; and
3) Focus on our retail fundamentals.
The Five Strategy Pillars of our Plan to return the Company to profitable growth are the following:
New Customer Acquisition. We will be implementing various new tools as well as increasing the use of other tools and programs that have proven successful to us in the past across both digital and in-store. With respect to digital we are targeting new customer acquisition through increased spending through paid search and paid social media outlets with relevant offers to attract new customers. Grass roots acquisition at the store level will focus on local events and outreach programs. Overall, we also plan to increase our total marketing spend.
Integrated Customer Experience. We are focused on improving our omni-channel customer experience. To do this we will be investing in technology both in store and also across our website and mobile app that will help keep our customers more engaged and make it even easier for them to find the personalized wellness solution that is right for their needs.
Relevant and Inspiring Assortment. We have undertaken a substantial upgrade to our assortment and will continue to make changes as we add products from faster growing categories. We are working with some of our top vendor partners to introduce several unique product lines or custom SKUs to increase the level of innovation and further differentiate our assortment. Our Private Brands portfolio will also play an important role in further differentiating our product assortment.
Customer Loyalty and Retention. A significant portion of visits to the VSI private brands assortment manufacturedVitamin Shoppe are for replenishment. To make this shopping experience even easier for our customers we introduced Spark Auto Delivery in 2017 and in the coming year we plan to add enhancements to this program as well as introduce new products and services such as Easy Reorder. We have a large and loyal customer base with approximately 90% of our sales coming from our Healthy Awards members. We plan significant upgrades to our loyalty program over the coming years that will give our members greater benefits and offers and increase their annual purchase level with us.
Operational Excellence. This includes a relentless focus on driving efficiencies, controlling costs and increasing overall margins at the Vitamin Shoppe every year. This pillar is guided by Nutri-Forcea heightened focus on free cash flow and includes a significant reduction in order to leverage capacity, and implement a series of initiatives designed to improve the financial performance of Nutri-Force.our capital expenditures going forward.
Store Counts and Locations
We plan to open approximately 15two new stores in Fiscal 2017 and the rate of new store growth and remodeling of existing stores is being further evaluated as part of the reinvention strategy.2018. The following table shows the change in our network of stores for the Fiscal Years 20122013 through 2016:2017:
Fiscal YearFiscal Year
2016 2015 2014 2013 20122017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Store Data:                  
Stores open at beginning of year758
 717
 659
 579
 528
775
 758
 717
 659
 579
Stores opened26
 50
 61
 52
 54
15
 26
 50
 61
 52
Stores acquired
 
 
 31
 

 
 
 
 31
Stores closed(9) (9) (3) (3) (3)(5) (9) (9) (3) (3)
Stores open at end of year775
 758
 717
 659
 579
785
 775
 758
 717
 659
    
Table of Contents

New stores have typically required approximately four to five years to mature, generating lower store level sales in the initial years than our mature stores. As a result, new stores generally have a negative impact on our overall operating margin. In addition, our new stores since the beginning of Fiscal 2013 are approximately 2,900 square feet compared to the average of our total store portfolio of approximately 3,500 square feet. As these stores mature, we expect them to contribute positively to our operating results. The following table reflects our store count by state, as well as the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico at December 31, 2016:30, 2017:
Stores Open at
December 31, 2016
 
Stores Open at
December 31, 2016
Stores Open at
December 30, 2017
 
Stores Open at
December 30, 2017
Alabama5
 Nebraska2
6
 Nebraska2
Arizona12
 Nevada8
12
 Nevada8
Arkansas2
 New Hampshire6
2
 New Hampshire6
California90
 New Jersey33
91
 New Jersey34
Colorado8
 New Mexico3
8
 New Mexico3
Connecticut11
 New York73
11
 New York72
Delaware3
 North Carolina26
3
 North Carolina27
District of Columbia1
 Ohio25
2
 Ohio25
Florida77
 Oklahoma3
79
 Oklahoma3
Georgia24
 Oregon9
25
 Oregon9
Hawaii7
 Pennsylvania30
7
 Pennsylvania31
Idaho2
 Rhode Island2
3
 Rhode Island2
Illinois41
 South Carolina16
41
 South Carolina17
Indiana13
 South Dakota1
13
 South Dakota1
Iowa3
 Tennessee13
3
 Tennessee13
Kansas3
 Texas54
3
 Texas55
Kentucky5
 Utah3
5
 Utah3
Louisiana8
 Vermont1
8
 Vermont1
Maine2
 Virginia26
2
 Virginia25
Maryland22
 Washington34
22
 Washington34
Massachusetts21
 Wisconsin6
21
 Wisconsin6
Michigan19
  19
  
Minnesota10
  10
  
Missouri8
  8
  
Mississippi1
 Puerto Rico3
1
 Puerto Rico3
  Total775
  Total785
    
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, we leased the property for all of our 775785 stores. Our typical lease terms are ten years, with one or two five-year renewal options. We do not believe that any individual store property is material to our financial condition or results of operations. Of the leases for our stores, 30 expire in Fiscal 2017, 9544 expire in Fiscal 2018, 103 expire in Fiscal 2019, 93 expire in Fiscal 2020, 90 expire in Fiscal 2021, 107 expire in Fiscal 2019, 95 expire in Fiscal 2020, 94 expire in Fiscal 20212022 and the balance expire in Fiscal 20222023 or thereafter. For the majority of our leases, renewal options remain available.
Products
We organize our products by category enabling comparisons between different brands within each product sub-category. In addition, our stores are staffed with experienced and knowledgeable Health Enthusiasts, many of whom are regular and informed VMS consumers. Our Health Enthusiasts are equipped with tablets to inform our customers about product features and assist our customers in product selection. To further inform our customers, our stores are equipped with Aisle 7®, an independent source of health and wellness information.
We offer a comprehensive selection of vitamins, minerals, herbs, homeopathic remedies, specialty supplements such as fish oil, probiotics, glucosamine and Co Q10, sports nutrition, weight management, aromatherapy, as well as natural bath and beauty products. Our offering includes approximately 17,000 SKUs from approximately 900 brands, including our own brands such as The Vitamin Shoppe®, BodyTech®, True Athlete®, Mytrition®, plnt®, ProBioCare®, Next Step® and Betancourt Nutrition®
Table of Contents

Betancourt Nutrition®brands which include products such as Ultimate Man, Ultimate Woman, Ultimate 10 Probiotic, Whey Tech and Whey Tech Pro 24 Proteins. We also offer a comprehensive assortment from leading national brands such as Optimum Nutrition®, Cellucor®, Garden of Life®, Quest Nutrition®, Solaray®, Solgar®, Megafood® and Nature’s Way®. This extensive assortment is designed to provide our customers with a unique selection of available products to help them achieve their health and wellness goals. Sales of our branded products accounted for approximately 21%22% of our net sales (excluding Nutri-Force net sales) in Fiscal 2016.2017.
Key Product Categories
Below is a comparison of our net merchandise sales by major product category and the respective percentage of our total net merchandise sales for the periods shown (dollars in thousands).
Fiscal 2016 (a) Fiscal 2015 (b) Fiscal 2014 (b)Fiscal 2017 Fiscal 2016 (a) Fiscal 2015
Product CategoryDollars % Dollars % Dollars %Dollars % Dollars % Dollars %
Vitamins, Minerals, Herbs and Homeopathy$339,597
 26.4% $320,872
 25.4% $311,863
 25.8%$328,986
 28.0% $339,597
 26.4% $320,872
 25.4%
Sports Nutrition408,288
 31.7% 421,293
 33.3% 419,804
 34.7%353,578
 30.1% 408,288
 31.7% 421,293
 33.3%
Specialty Supplements308,945
 24.0% 289,938
 22.9% 288,045
 23.8%294,546
 25.0% 308,945
 24.0% 289,938
 22.9%
Other230,252
 17.9% 232,399
 18.4% 190,285
 15.7%199,418
 16.9% 230,252
 17.9% 232,399
 18.4%
Total1,287,082
 100.0% 1,264,502
 100.0% 1,209,997
 100.0%1,176,528
 100.0% 1,287,082
 100.0% 1,264,502
 100.0%
Delivery Revenue2,161
   2,047
   3,049
  2,166
   2,161
   2,047
  
$1,289,243
   $1,266,549
   $1,213,046
  $1,178,694
   $1,289,243
   $1,266,549
  
 
(a)Fiscal 2016 includes a 53rd week.
(b)Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 figures have been restated to conform with changes to Fiscal 2016 product category classifications.

Vitamins, Minerals, Herbs and Homeopathy
Vitamins and minerals are recommended to maintain health, proactively to improve health and in support of specific health conditions. These products help prevent nutrient deficiencies that can occur when diet alone does not provide all the necessary vitamins and minerals our bodies need. The vitamin and mineral product category includes multi-vitamins, which many consider to be a foundation of a healthy regimen, lettered vitamins, such as Vitamins A, C, D, E, and B-complex, along with major and trace minerals such as calcium, magnesium, chromium and zinc.
Herbs offer a natural remedy to address specific conditions. Certain herbs help support specific body systems, including ginkgo to support brain function and milk thistle to help support liver function, as well as other less common herbs such as black cohosh for menopause support. Herbal products include whole herbs, standardized extracts, herb combination formulas and teas. Homeopathic remedies offer our customers the ability to address health concerns while providing the safety of having no known drug interactions or side effects.
With approximately 6,5006,000 SKUs in this product category, a wide range of potency levels and multiple delivery systems, our customers have many choices to fit their individual needs.
Sports Nutrition
Our sports nutrition consumers are looking for products to help maintain or supplement a healthy lifestyle. These products are used in conjunction with cardiovascular conditioning, weight training and sports activities. Major categories in sports nutrition include protein and weight gain powders, meal replacements, weight management, and pre and post-workout supplements to either support energy production or enhance recovery after exercise. Our sports nutrition products are offered in many convenient forms, such as powders, tablets, capsules, soft gels and liquids. Our sports nutrition consumers include the sports enthusiast, weekend warrior, endurance athlete, marathoner, serious bodybuilder, as well as those seeking to maintain a healthy fitness level. We offer approximately 2,000 SKUs in sports nutrition.
Specialty Supplements
Specialty supplements help supply higher levels of nutrients than diet alone can provide, help individuals stay healthy, and support specific conditions and life stages such as childhood, pregnancy, menopause and aging. Categories of specialty supplements include omega fatty acids, probiotics and condition specific formulas. Certain specialty supplements, such as
Table of Contents

organic greens, psyllium fiber and soy proteins, provide added support during various life stages. Folic acid is specifically
Table of Contents

useful during pregnancy. Super antioxidants, such as coenzyme Q-10, grapeseed extract and pycnogenol, address specific conditions. High ORAC (oxygen radical absorptive capacity) fruit concentrates such as; gogi, mangosteen, pomegranate and blueberry help prevent oxygen radical damage. Other specialty supplement formulas are targeted to support specific organs, biosystems and body functions. We offer approximately 4,5003,500 SKUs of specialty supplements.
Other
Our “Other” category represents all other product classifications we stock that are not included within the previously described categories. These products include items such as on the go bars, drinks and snacks, natural beauty and personal care. Our on the go bars, drinks and snacks offer our customers access to an offering of protein, low carb and natural bars, protein, energy and functional beverages and natural snacks. Natural beauty and personal care products offer an alternative to traditional products that often contain synthetic and/or other ingredients that our customers find objectionable. Our customers choose these products over more traditional products because they contain organic and natural ingredients, are free of pesticides or not tested on animals and/or are more closely aligned with the health and wellness goals of our customers. We offer approximately 4,0005,500 SKUs for our Other category. In Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, and Fiscal 2014, our Other product category includes net merchandise sales to third parties of Nutri-Force of $32.2 million, $50.0 million $56.6 million and $40.3$56.6 million, respectively.
Delivery Revenue
Delivery revenue represents amounts billed to customers for shipping fees.
Access to New Products
One of the many components of customer satisfaction is the introduction of new products. We identify customer and market trends by listening to our customers, Health Enthusiasts, vendors, contract manufacturers and market influencers. We maintain active partnerships with our vendors to stay on top of their product offerings and to bring new products to our customers quickly. In addition, we have a knowledgeable team in-house who focuses on bringing new Vitamin Shoppe branded products to our offering. Each year we launch many new products under our own brands, including the launch in Fiscal 20162017 of approximately 6080 new products. These include new product expansions into sustained releasewhey isolate proteins and Isotech 42 ready to drink clear proteins inFlash Point, our new high intensity pre-workout concentrate supplement under our BodyTech® brand, aromatherapy essential oils and blends under our Vitamin Shoppe® brand, continued focus and product development of our plnt® brand line with raw and non-GMO whole food vitamins, unique herbal formulas and honey, and the expansionlaunch of the Duocap™ technology in our plnt®ProBioCare® brand with the addition of key itemsline which allows us to offer new probiotic based formulas that also support specific conditions such as protein based meal replacement powders, mushroom immune formulamood, stress, urinary and adaptogenic herb formulas.prostate health.
Manufacturing
Through Nutri-Force, we provide custom manufacturing and private labeling of VMS products and custom manufacturing and develop and market our own branded products for both the VSI product assortment and for sales to third parties and for the VSI product assortment.parties. Our manufacturing operations, which are located in Miami Lakes, Florida, produce tablets, capsules, soft-gels and powders. By operating our own manufacturing facilities, we believe we have the ability to better control the production and timing of new product introductions, and maintain high standards of product quality.
The Company is currently exploring strategic alternatives related to Nutri-Force, including the potential sale of this subsidiary. Refer to Long-Lived Assets section of our Critical Accounting Policies included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Suppliers and Inventory
The Company had two suppliers from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2017, one supplier from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2016 and two suppliers from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2015 and one supplier from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2014.2015. We purchased approximately 11%15% of our total merchandise from these suppliers during Fiscal 2017 and approximately 11% during Fiscal 2016 and approximately 17% during Fiscal 2015 and 12% during Fiscal 2014.2015.
We consider numerous factors in supplier selection, including, but not limited to, quality, price, credit terms, and product offerings. As is customary in our industry, we generally do not have long-term contracts with any supplier and most suppliers may discontinue selling to us at any time.
We strive to maintain sufficient inventory to enable us to provide a high level of service to our customers. Inventory, accounts receivable and accounts payable levels, payment terms and return policies are in accordance with standard business
Table of Contents

procedures. We maintain a distribution network which we use in conjunction with a just-in-time inventory ordering system that we use to replenish our stores based upon customer demand of a given product or products. Our working capital requirements for merchandise inventory will continue to increase as we continue to open additional stores and expand our distribution network. Currently, our practice is to establish an inventory level of approximately $145,000 at cost for each of our stores, the cost of which is partially offset by vendor incentive and allowance programs. Additionally, 30 day payment terms have been extended to us by some of our suppliers allowing us to effectively manage our inventory and working capital. We believe that our buying power enables us to receive favorable pricing terms and enhances our ability to obtain high demand merchandise.
Table of Contents

Warehouse and Distribution
We operate our supply chain primarily from two Company operated distribution center facilities. The Company operates distribution centers in North Bergen, New JerseyAshland, Virginia and Ashland, Virginia.Avondale, Arizona. By operating our own facilities we gain greater control over operations and costs. Our products manufactured by Nutri-Force are warehoused and distributed through its Miami Lakes, Florida facilities.
In the fourththird quarter of 2016,2017, the Company entered into an agreementannounced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease a warehousing andexpiration. Distribution operations have been transitioned to the Company's other distribution facility located in Avondale, Arizona, which we expect to open before the end of Fiscal 2017. We previously utilized a third-party logistics provider to service the west coast, and we believe operating our own facility will provide improved service levels and network efficiencies.centers.
Regulatory and Quality Control
The Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) is the regulatory authority charged with overseeing the products we offer and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) regulates the advertising of those products.
Our Scientific and Regulatory Affairs (“S&RA”) and Legal departments review all aspects of our Company’s FDA and FTC regulatory processes, ensuring compliance with regulations. We have established processes to review the underlying safety and efficacy of our branded products, including The Vitamin Shoppe®, BodyTech®, True Athlete®, Mytrition®, plnt®, ProBioCare®, Next Step® and Betancourt Nutrition®. These processes include review of the ingredients’ safety information, product formulation, product form, product labeling, the efficacy and claim support for the product and any marketing materials. All consumer communications that deal with product and health issues must be approved by S&RA prior to being disseminated to the public.
We have standard procedures whereby all potential Vitamin Shoppe contract manufacturers are reviewed and approved before they can supply any of our branded products. In addition, all potential new products are evaluated and approved prior to being accepted into our branded product lines.
Our relationships with manufacturers require that all of our branded products not be adulterated or misbranded under any provisions of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) and the regulations promulgated thereunder. This includes, but is not limited to, compliance with applicable Current Good Manufacturing Practices (“cGMP”). This means that ingredients in our products must be tested for identity, purity, quality, strength, and composition before being incorporated into our branded products, and that our final branded products must again be tested for identity, purity, quality, strength, and composition prior to being released. All of these products require a certificate of analysis, which includes certification to 100% of label claim.
We have established a standard quality control operating procedure that calls for on-site audits of our contract manufacturers’ facilities and processes, and have established an internal team that will audit each of these facilities and work with our contract manufacturers to resolve any noncompliance with dietary supplement cGMP regulations. We require that our manufacturers have certificates of analysis (such as for microbial testing and label testing).
Third party vendors, are also subject to a standard review, must comply with our vendor purchase agreement, including guaranteeing that all third-party products are lawful and manufactured in compliance with applicable cGMPs, and are required to carry adequate insurance policies to satisfy our standards. Each new product proposed to be carried by us is reviewed by our S&RA department. They reject those products that they believe may present undue risk or be unsafe.
Healthy Awards Program
Our Healthy Awards Program which we established over 15 years ago, encourages our customers to make repeat purchases and enables us to enhance customer loyalty. The program is free of charge to join, and members earn one point for every dollar they spend, and points are accumulated toward a credit certificate which can be applied to a future purchase. Beginning in Fiscal 2016, the Company implemented enhancements to the program, including the issuance of credit certificates on a quarterly basis compared with annual issuances under the previous program. We enrolled approximately 2.11.8 million new members in Fiscal 2016.2017. The number of active members between retail and online shoppers was approximately 6.3 million as of December 30, 2017 and as of December 31, 2016. An active member is a customer that has purchased an item within the last twelve months.
Table of Contents

We utilize our Healthy Awards Program database to track customer purchasing patterns across our retail and direct business segments,segment, analyze market and industry trends and create targeted merchandising and marketing strategies. In addition, it provides us with customer and demographic data we use to assist us in the selection of future store locations.
Table of Contents

Marketing
We believe our high quality real estate is one of our primary marketing tools, as we locate our stores in high-visibility areas. We also conduct targeted marketing efforts by sending promotional offers to members of our Healthy Awards Program, and we continue to develop our digital marketing and social media strategies. We advertise in national magazines, and engage in local advertising via direct mail, radio and television for certain new stores.
We promote our own branded products, including The Vitamin Shoppe®, BodyTech®, True Athlete®, Mytrition®, plnt®, ProBioCare®, Next Step® and Betancourt Nutrition® through our retail channel by placing the products in strategic and highly visible locations in our stores.
Competition
The U.S. nutritional supplements retail industry is highly competitive and fragmented. Competition is based primarily on quality, product assortment, price, customer service, convenience, marketing support and availability of new products. We compete with publicly and privately owned companies with broad geographical market coverage and product categories. We compete with other specialty and mass market retailers, including GNC®, Whole Foods®, Natural Grocers®, Sprouts Farmers Market®, Vitamin World®, Costco® and other club chains, Wal-Mart®, drugstoredrug store chains including Rite-Aid®, CVS® and Walgreens®, internet and mail order companies, including Amazon.com®, Puritan’s Pride®, Vitacost.com®, Bodybuilding.com®, Doctors Trust®, Swanson® and iHerb®, in addition to a variety of independent health and vitamin stores and e-commerce outlets.
Insurance and Risk Management
We purchase insurance to partially offset standard risks in our industry, including policies to cover products liability, travel liability, auto liability and other casualty and property risks. We are self-insured and utilize high deductible programs for certain losses related to our employee medical benefits, workers’ compensation and general liability, although we maintain stop-loss coverage with third-party insurers to limit our liability exposure. Our insurance rates are based on our safety record, claims experience and trends in the insurance industry.
We face an inherent risk of exposure to product liability claims if, among other things, the use of our products results in injury. With respect to product liability coverage, we carry insurance coverage typical of our industry and product lines. Our coverage involves self-insured retentions with primary and excess liability coverage above the retention amount. We have the ability to refer certain claims to our contract manufacturers, third-party vendors and their respective insurers to pay the costs associated with any claims arising from those contract manufacturers’ or third-party vendors’ products. Our insurance covers claims that are not adequately covered by a contract manufacturer’s or third-party vendor’s insurance and provides for excess secondary coverage above the limits provided by our contract manufacturers or third-party vendors. We believe we have obtained a prudent amount of insurance for the insurable risks associated with our business. Our experience is that our insurance costs have increased in the past, and may increase in the future.
Tradenames and Other Intellectual Property
We believe trademark protection is particularly important to the maintenance of the recognized proprietary brand names under which we market our products. We own trademarks or trade names that we use in conjunction with the sale of our products, including The Vitamin Shoppe®, BodyTech®, True Athlete®, Mytrition®, plnt®, ProBioCare®, Next Step® and Betancourt Nutrition® brand names. We also rely upon trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position. We protect our intellectual property rights through a variety of methods including trademark and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements and proprietary information agreements with vendors, employees, consultants and others who have access to our proprietary information. Protection of our intellectual property often affords us the opportunity to enhance our position in the marketplace by precluding our competitors from using or otherwise exploiting our technology and brands. The carrying value of our trademarks and brands which are primarily indefinite lived intangible assets, was $19.0 million at December 30, 2017 and $78.9 million at December 31, 2016 and $79.5 million at December 26, 2015.2016.
Sales from International Sources
For each of the last three years, less than 1.0% of our sales have been derived from international sources.
Table of Contents

Employees
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, we had a total of 3,8873,860 full-time and 1,6161,713 part-time employees, of whom 4,3344,377 were employed in our retail channelstores and 1,1691,196 were employed in corporate, manufacturing, distribution and direct channele-commerce support
Table of Contents

functions. None of our employees belong to a union or are a party to any collective bargaining or similar agreement except for certain employees at one of our Seattle based stores, who are members of the United Food & Commercial Workers Local No. 367. We consider our relationships with our employees to be good.
Environmental
We are subject to numerous federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations governing our operations, including the handling, transportation and disposal of our products and our non-hazardous and hazardous substances and wastes, as well as emissions and discharges into the environment, including discharges to air, surface water and groundwater. Failure to comply with those laws and regulations could result in costs for corrective action, penalties or the imposition of other liabilities. Changes in environmental laws or the interpretation thereof or the development of new facts could also cause us to incur additional capital and operational expenditures to maintain compliance with environmental laws and regulations. We also are subject to laws and regulations that impose liability and cleanup responsibility for releases of hazardous substances into the environment without regard to fault or knowledge about the condition or action causing the liability. Under certain of these laws and regulations, such liabilities can be imposed for cleanup of previously owned or operated properties. The presence of contamination from those substances or wastes could also adversely affect our ability to utilize our leased properties. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations has not had a material effect upon our earnings or financial position; however, if we violate any environmental obligation, it could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial performance.
Government Regulation
The formulation, manufacturing, processing, labeling, packaging, advertising and distribution of our products are subject to regulation by various federal agencies, including the FDA, the FTC, the Consumer Product Safety Commission, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (“USDA”) and the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”). These activities are also regulated by various agencies of the states and localities in which our products are sold. The FDA, under the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDCA”) regulates the processing, formulation, safety, manufacture, packaging, labeling and distribution of dietary supplements (including vitamins, minerals, and herbs) and cosmetics. The FTC regulates the advertising of these products.
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994 (“DSHEA”) amended the FDCA to establish a new framework governing the composition, safety, labeling and marketing of dietary supplements. “Dietary supplements” are defined as vitamins, minerals, herbs, other botanicals, amino acids and other dietary substances for human use to supplement the diet, as well as concentrates, metabolites, constituents, extracts or combinations of such dietary ingredients. Generally, under DSHEA, dietary ingredients that were on the market prior to October 15, 1994 may be used in dietary supplements without notifying the FDA. New dietary ingredients (i.e., not marketed in the U.S. prior to October 15, 1994) must be the subject of a new dietary ingredient notification submitted to the FDA unless the ingredient has been “present in the food supply as an article used for food” without being “chemically altered.” A new dietary ingredient notification must provide the FDA with evidence of a “history of use or other evidence of safety” establishing that use of the dietary ingredient “will reasonably be expected to be safe.” A new dietary ingredient notification must be submitted to the FDA at least 75 days before the initial marketing of the new dietary ingredient. There can be no assurance that the FDA will accept the evidence of safety for any new dietary ingredients that we may want to market, and the FDA’s refusal to accept such evidence could prevent the marketing of such dietary ingredients. In 2011, the FDA issued draft guidance regarding new dietary ingredient notifications, including the scope of the notification requirement and the content of such notifications, and in August 2016, the FDA issued revised draft guidance. While the revised draft guidance is not enforceable, it may be deemed to represent the FDA’s current point of view. Should the FDA enforce the draft guidance as currently written, it would have a negative effect on the innovation and continued marketing of dietary supplements. There is no certainty that the FDA will accept any particular evidence of safety for any new dietary ingredient. The FDA’s refusal to accept such evidence could prevent the marketing of those dietary ingredients.
DSHEA permits “statements of nutritional support” to be included in labeling for dietary supplements without premarket FDA approval. Such statements must be submitted to the FDA within 30 days of first use in marketing and must be accompanied by a label disclosure that “This statement has not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration. This product is not intended to diagnose, treat, cure, or prevent any disease.” Such statements may describe how a particular dietary ingredient affects the structure, function or general well-being of the body, or the mechanism of action by which a dietary ingredient may affect body structure, function or well-being, but may not expressly or implicitly represent that a dietary supplement will diagnose, cure, mitigate, treat, or prevent a disease. Any statement of nutritional support we make in labeling
Table of Contents

must possess scientific evidence substantiating that the statement is truthful and not misleading. If the FDA were to determine that a particular statement of nutritional support was an unacceptable drug claim or an unauthorized version of a health claim about disease risk reduction for a food product, or if the FDA were to determine that a particular claim was not adequately supported by existing scientific data or was false or misleading, we would be prevented from using that claim. In addition, the
Table of Contents

FDA deems internet materials as labeling; therefore, our internet materials must comply with FDA requirements and could be the subject of regulatory action by the FDA, or by the FTC if that agency, reviewing the materials as advertising, considers the materials false and misleading.
DSHEA provides that so-called “third-party literature,” such as a reprint of a peer-reviewed scientific publication linking a particular dietary ingredient with health benefits, may be used “in connection with the sale of a dietary supplement to consumers” without the literature being subject to regulation as labeling. Such literature must not be false or misleading; the literature may not “promote” a particular manufacturer or brand of dietary supplement; and a balanced view of the available scientific information on the subject matter must be presented. If the literature fails to satisfy each of these requirements, we may be prevented from disseminating such literature with our products, and any dissemination could subject our product to regulatory action as an illegal drug.
In June 2007, the FDA published current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) regulations that govern the manufacturing, packing and holding of dietary ingredients and dietary supplements. cGMP regulations require dietary supplements to be prepared, packaged and held in compliance with strict rules, and require quality control provisions similar to those in the cGMP regulations for drugs. The FDA could inspect one of our facilities or those of one of our contract manufacturers and determine that the facility was not in compliance with these regulations, and cause affected products made or held in the facility to be subject to FDA enforcement actions. We believe our manufacturing and distribution facilities and practices comply with these rules. In addition, as is common practice in the industry, we rely on our third-party contract manufacturers to ensure that the products they manufacture and sell to us comply with all applicable regulatory requirements and seek representations and warranties in our agreements with these contract manufacturers confirming such compliance.
The FDA has broad authority to enforce the provisions of the FDCA applicable to foods, dietary supplements, and cosmetics, including powers to issue a public warning letter to a company, to publicize information about illegal products, to request a recall of illegal products from the market, and to request the United States Department of Justice to initiate a seizure action, an injunction action, or a criminal prosecution in the U. S. courts.
The FTC exercises jurisdiction over the advertising of foods, dietary supplements and cosmetics. In recent years, the FTC has instituted numerous enforcement actions against dietary supplement companies for failure to have adequate substantiation for claims made in advertising or for the use of false or misleading advertising claims. As a result of our efforts to comply with applicable statutes and regulations, we have from time to time reformulated, eliminated or relabeled certain of our products and revised certain provisions of our sales and marketing program. The FTC has broad authority to enforce its laws and regulations applicable to foods, dietary supplements and cosmetics, including the ability to institute enforcement actions which often result in consent decrees, injunctions, and the payment of civil penalties by the companies involved. Failure to comply with the FTC’s laws and regulations could impair our ability to market our products.
We are also subject to regulation under various state and local laws that include provisions governing, among other things, the registration, formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising and distribution of foods, dietary supplements and cosmetics. In addition, in the future, we may become subject to additional laws or regulations administered by the FDA or by other federal, state, local or foreign regulatory authorities, to the repeal of laws or regulations that we consider favorable, such as DSHEA, or to more stringent interpretations of current laws or regulations. In the future, we believe the dietary supplement industry will likely face increased scrutiny from federal and state regulatory authorities. It is difficult to predict the effect future laws, regulations, repeals or interpretations will have on our business. However, such changes in the regulatory landscape could require the reformulation of certain products, recalls or discontinuance of certain products, additional administrative requirements, revised or additional labeling, increased scientific substantiation or other new requirements. Any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial performance.
Corporate Information
We were incorporated in Delaware on September 27, 2002. Our principal executive offices are located at 300 Harmon Meadow Blvd., Secaucus, New Jersey 07094.
Table of Contents

Item 1A.    Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following factors, in addition to other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, in evaluating our Company and our business.
Table of Contents

Risks Related to Our Business and Industry
We operate in a highly competitive industry and our failure to compete effectively could materially and adversely affect our sales and growth prospects.
The U.S. nutritional supplements retail industry is a large and highly fragmented industry. We compete primarily against other specialty retailers, supermarkets, drugstores,drug stores, club chains, mass merchants, multi-level marketing organizations and e-commerce companies. This market is highly sensitive to the introduction of new products, which may rapidly capture a significant share of the market. As certain products become more mainstream, with broader distribution, we experience increased competition for those products. For example, as the trend in favor of low carb products developed, we experienced increased competition for our low carb products from supermarkets, drug stores, club chains, mass merchants and other food companies. Increased competition from companies that distribute through retail, e-commerce or wholesale channels could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. Certain of our competitors may have significantly greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. In addition, our competitors may be more effective and efficient in introducing new products. Furthermore, if we fail to increase the utilization of our supply chain network, fail to maximize the efficiency of our ship direct to customers strategy,strategies, or fail to provide our customers with an attractive omni-channel experience, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. We may not be able to compete effectively, and any of the factors listed above may cause price reductions, reduced margins and losses of our market share.
Unfavorable publicity or consumer perception of our products and any similar products distributed by other companies could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, which could result in decreased sales and significant fluctuations in our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We depend significantly on consumer perception regarding the safety and quality of our products, as well as similar products distributed by other companies. Consumer perception of products can be significantly influenced by adverse publicity in the form of published scientific research, national media attention or other publicity, whether or not accurate, that associates consumption of our products or any other similar products with illness or other adverse effects, or questions the benefits of our or similar products or that claims that any such products are ineffective. A new product may initially be received favorably, resulting in high sales of that product, but that sales level may not be sustainable as consumer preferences change. Future scientific research or publicity could be unfavorable to our industry or any of our particular products and may not be consistent with earlier favorable research or publicity. Unfavorable research or publicity could have a material adverse effect on our ability to generate sales.
Our failure to appropriately and timely respond to changing consumer preferences and demand for new products and services could significantly harm our customer relationships and our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business is subject to changing consumer trends and preferences. Our failure to accurately predict or react to these trends could negatively impact consumer opinion of us as a source for the latest products, which in turn could harm our customer relationships and cause us to lose market share. The success of our product offerings depends upon a number of factors, including our ability to: 
anticipate customer needs;
innovate and develop new products;
successfully introduce new products in a timely manner;
price our products competitively with retail and online competitors;
deliver our products in sufficient volumes and in a timely manner; and
differentiate our product offerings from those of our competitors.
If we do not introduce new products or make enhancements to meet the changing needs of our customers in a timely manner, some of our products could be rendered obsolete, which could have a material adverse effect on our sales and other operating results.
Table of Contents

We continue to explore new strategic initiatives, including our reinvention strategy, but we may not be able to successfully execute on, or realize the expected benefits from the implementation of our strategic initiatives, and our pursuit of new strategic initiatives may pose significant costs and risks.
In Fiscal 2015, we began development of our reinvention strategy to refocus our business on market-based opportunities for stronger growth. As part of our reinvention strategy, we are comprehensively reviewing our customer experience. Our reinvention strategy may include initiatives to optimize product assortment, integration of technology and e-
Table of Contents

commerce, changes to the layout and design of our retail stores, and improvements in service levels provided by our Health Enthusiasts.  Our strategic initiatives are also focused on, among other things, developingnew customer acquisition, improving the customer experience through the roll-out of initiatives including increasing customer engagement and personalization, improving the omni-channel experience (including in stores as well as through the internet and mobile devices), providing a presence in new international markets through franchise, wholesalerelevant and retail distribution opportunities, developing new products,inspiring product assortment and evaluating acquisitionsimproving customer loyalty and joint ventures.retention. Our future operating results are dependent, in part, on our management’s success in implementing the reinvention strategythese and other strategic initiatives, and as a result could divert management’s attention from our existing business as management focuses on developing the initiativethese initiatives and related operations. Also, our short-term operating results could be unfavorably impacted by the opportunity and financial costs associated with the implementation of our strategic plans such as consulting fees incurred in connection with the reinvention strategy, and we might not realize the benefits from such strategies. In addition, we may not be successful in achieving the intended objectives of the reinvention strategy and other strategic initiatives in a timely manner or at all.
We may experience product recalls, withdrawals or seizures, which could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may be subject to product recalls, withdrawals or seizures if any of the products we sell or the products that we manufacture for third parties is believed to cause injury or illness or if we are alleged to have violated governmental regulations in the manufacturing, labeling, promotion, sale or distribution of those products. A significant recall, withdrawal or seizure of any of the products we manufacture or sell may require significant management attention, would likely result in substantial and unexpected costs and may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Furthermore, a recall, withdrawal or seizure of any of our products may adversely affect consumer confidence in our brands and thus decrease consumer demand for our products. As is common in the VMS industry, except with respect to the products that we manufacture at our manufacturing facility, we rely on our contract manufacturers and suppliers to ensure that the products they manufacture and sell to us comply with all applicable regulatory and legislative requirements. In general, we seek representations and warranties, indemnification and/or insurance from our contract manufacturers and suppliers. However, even with adequate insurance and indemnification, any claims of non-compliance could significantly damage our reputation and consumer confidence in our products. In addition, the failure of those products to comply with applicable regulatory and legislative requirements could prevent us from marketing the products or require us to recall or remove such products from the market, which in certain cases could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Disruptions at our or our contract manufacturers’ manufacturing facilities or loss of our or their manufacturing certifications could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and customer relationships.
Our private brands merchandise accounted for approximately 21%22% of our net sales (excluding Nutri-Force net sales) in Fiscal 2016.2017. Any significant disruption in a contract manufacturers’ manufacturing facilities for any reason, including regulatory requirements, an FDA determination that the facility is not in compliance with the cGMP regulations, the loss of certifications, power interruptions, destruction of or damage to facilities, terrorist attacks, civil unrest, war or the perceived threat thereof, fires, hurricanes and other natural disasters could disrupt our contract manufacturers’ ability to manufacture products for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment as well as disrupt our ability to manufacture products for our contract manufacturing customers and our own branded products. Any such disruption could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. While we do not believe it would be difficult to source our products from other contract manufacturers, a transition period would be required in order to source our own branded products from other contract manufacturers.
Nutri-Force has incurred operating losses, which are expected to continue in Fiscal 2017.2018. We plan on implementinghave implemented initiatives to turnaround the performance of Nutri-Force which may not be successful in achieving the expected improvements, or may require more time and resources than expected to implement.improvements.
The success of the turnaroundimproved performance of our manufacturing operation will depend in large part on our ability to implement arealize the benefits from the series of initiatives designedwhich have been implemented to reduce complexity, such as reducecomplexity. These initiatives included reducing the manufacture of unprofitable product and focusfocusing on core customers, improveimproving efficiencies, establishestablishing core processes and reducereducing costs and expenses. If the turnaround plan does not achieve its intended results, the anticipated improvements to our operating results may not be realized fully or at all, or may take longer to realize than expected,expected. In addition, we are evaluating strategic alternatives for Nutri-Force, including a potential sale. If we were to sell Nutri-Force, we might have to seek new sources to provide contract manufacturing for some of our private label VMS products. It could take substantial time and the costsresources to implement this plan could be significantly higher than expected. We expect the turnaround plantransfer production of VMS products to be time consuming,one or more contract manufacturers, which may result in supply chain inefficiencies and require substantial resources and effort. There can be no assurance that the plan will be successful and as a result, may adversely affect our ability to satisfy consumer demand. In addition, we may not find new contract
Table of Contents

manufacturers that have sufficient capacity to satisfy our demands, or the ability to meet our quality standards; or, if we do, on terms that are favorable to us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business or financial results and operations.performance.
Our customers for whom we contract manufacture may significantly influence our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our contract manufacturing business is dependent on demand for the products we manufacture for our customers and we have no control or influence over the market demand for those products. Demand for our customers’ products can be
Table of Contents

adversely affected by, among other things, regulatory issues, the loss of patent or other intellectual property rights protection, the emergence of competing products, competition from other contract manufacturers, negative public or consumer perception of those products or our industry and changes in the marketing strategies for such products.
If production volumes of products that we manufacture for third parties and related revenues are not maintained, it may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Additionally, any changes in product mix due to our customers’ products may adversely affect our results of operations.
Increases in the price or shortages of supply of key raw materials could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our products and the products we manufacture for third parties are composed of certain key raw materials. If the prices of these raw materials were to increase significantly, it could result in a significant increase to us in the prices charged to us for our own branded products and third-party products. Raw material prices may increase in the future and we may not be able to pass on those increases to customers who purchase our products. A significant increase in the price of raw materials that cannot be passed on to customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We are reliant upon the supply of raw materials that meet our specifications and the specifications of third parties for which we manufacture. If any raw material is adulterated and does not meet our specifications or third parties’ specifications, it could significantly impact our ability to manufacture products and could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In addition, if we are no longer able to obtain products from one or more of our suppliers on terms reasonable to us or at all, our ability to perform under contracts with third parties for whom we manufacture products and our customer relationships could be materially and adversely affected. Events such as terrorist attacks, civil unrest or war, or the perceived threat thereof, may also have a significant adverse effect on raw material availability essential to the manufacturing of our products which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The cost of construction materials we use to build and remodel our stores is also subject to significant price volatility based on market and economic conditions. Higher construction material prices would increase the capital expenditures needed to construct a new store or remodel an existing store and could increase the rent payable by the Company under its leases.
We currently rely primarily on two warehouse and distribution facilities to distribute most of the products we sell. Disruptions to these warehouse and distribution facilities could adversely affect our business.
Our primary warehouse and distribution operations are currently concentrated in two locations; in North Bergen, New JerseyAshland, Virginia and in Ashland, Virginia.Avondale, Arizona. Any significant disruption to our two primary distribution centers operations for any reason, such as a flood, fire or hurricane, could adversely affect our product distributions and sales until we are able to secure an alternative distribution method. Unexpected delays in deliveries or increases in transportation costs (including through increased fuel costs) could significantly decrease our sales and operating results. In addition, labor shortages in the transportation industry or long-term disruptions to the national and international transportation infrastructure that lead to delays or interruptions of deliveries could negatively affect our business.
In addition, during Fiscal 2017, we plan on opening a warehousing and distribution facility in Avondale, Arizona. If we fail to successfully open and effectively utilize this new distribution center, it could have an adverse affect on our financial results.
Failure to increase the utilization of our supply chain network could have a material adverse effect on our business.
If we fail to increase the utilization of our supply chain network and expand functionality of our information technology systems, we could experience increased costs associated with diminished productivity and operating inefficiencies related to the flow of goods through our supply chain, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
Our existing stores, or any stores we open in the future, may not achieve sales and operating levels consistent with historical results.current financial projections. In addition, our growth strategy includes the addition of a number of new stores each year. We may not be able to successfully implement this strategy on a timely basis or at all, and our business could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to successfully negotiate favorable lease terms.
Table of Contents

Since the beginning of Fiscal 2014,2015, we have opened 13791 stores, expanding our presence in our existing markets as well as entering new markets. Historically, our new stores have reached sales that are consistent with our mature stores over the
Table of Contents

course of approximately four to five years. As part of our reinvention strategy, we have reduced the number of planned new store openings in Fiscal 2017,2018 as we assessfocus on the performancetransformation of recently remodeledexisting stores. Our new stores opened since the beginning of Fiscal 2013 average approximately 2,900 square feet compared to the average of our total store portfolio of approximately 3,500 square feet. Existing stores, or any new stores we open in the future, may not achieve sales and operating levels consistent with our historical results.current financial projections. In addition, customer migration from retail stores to e-commerce may also reduce store potential. The failure of our existing stores and new stores to achieve sales and operating levels consistent with our historical resultscurrent financial projections could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and operating results. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, we leased 775785 stores along with our corporate headquarters, additional office space and manufacturing and distribution facilities. The store leases are generally for a term of ten years and we have options to extend most leases for a minimum of five years. Our business, financial condition, and operating results could be materially and adversely affected if we are unable to continue to negotiate acceptable lease and renewal terms.
In addition, our growth continues to depend, in part, on our ability to open and operate new stores successfully. The success of this strategy depends upon, among other things, the identification of suitable sites for store locations, the negotiation of acceptable lease terms, the hiring, training and retention of competent sales personnel, and the effective management of inventory to meet the needs of new and existing stores on a timely basis. Our continued expansion will also place increased demands on our operational, managerial and administrative resources. These increased demands could cause us to operate our business less effectively, which in turn could cause deterioration in the financial performance of our existing stores. Further, our new store openings may result in reduced net sales volumes in the direct channel, as well as in our existing stores in those markets. We expect to fund our expansion through cash flow from operations and, if necessary, by borrowings under our revolving credit facility. If we experience a decline in performance, we may slow or discontinue store openings. If we fail to successfully implement these strategies, our financial condition and operating results may be materially and adversely affected.
Some of our new stores may be located in areas where we have little or no presence or brand awareness. Those markets may have different competitive conditions, market conditions, consumer tastes and discretionary spending patterns than our existing markets, which may cause our new stores to be less successful than stores in our existing markets. Alternatively, many of our new stores will be located in areas where we have existing stores. Although we have experience in these markets, increasing the number of locations in these markets may result in inadvertent over-saturation of markets and temporarily or permanently divert customers and sales from our existing stores, thereby adversely affecting our overall financial performance.
The loss of key management could negatively affect our business.
Our success largely depends on the efforts and abilities of our senior executive group and key personnel. The loss of the services of one or more of our key executives or personnel, or the increased demands placed on our key executives and personnel by our continued growth could adversely affect our financial performance and our ability to execute our strategies. Our continued success also depends on our ability to attract and retain qualified team members to meet our future growth needs.members. We may not be able to attract and retain necessary team members to operate our business.
Our inability to attract, train and retain highly qualified Health Enthusiasts could adversely impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our success depends on the continued contributions of our Health Enthusiasts, and the loss of these contributions could have a material adverse effect on our business. We must attract, train and retain a large and growing number of qualified Health Enthusiasts, while controlling related labor costs and maintaining our core values. Our ability to control labor and benefit costs is subject to numerous external factors, including regulatory changes, prevailing wage rates, and healthcare and other insurance costs. We compete with other retail and non-retail businesses for these Health Enthusiasts and invest significant resources in training and motivating them. There is no assurance that we willWe may not be able to attract or retain qualified Health Enthusiasts in the future, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
If we fail to protect our brand names, competitors may adopt tradenames that dilute the value of our brand names.
We may be unable or unwilling to strictly enforce our tradenames in each jurisdiction in which we do business. In addition, because of the differences in foreign trademark laws concerning proprietary rights, our trademarks may not receive the same degree of protection in foreign countries as they do in the U.S. Also, we may not always be able to successfully enforce our trademarks against competitors or against challenges by others. Our failure to successfully protect our trademarks could diminish the value and efficacy of our past and future marketing efforts, and could cause customer confusion, which could, in turn, materially and adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Table of Contents

Disruptions in our information systems could damage our reputation, be expensive to remedy and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
We rely extensively on information systems for point-of-sale processing in our stores, our e-commerce business, supply chain, manufacturing operations, financial reporting, human resources and various other processes and transactions. Our information systems, including those provided and maintained by third-party service providers, are subject to damage or interruption from power outages or other types of damage, including those due to computer and telecommunications failures, natural events including hurricanes, fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, high winds and other severe weather, and from events caused by humans, including computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and acts of war or terrorism. Any of these events could cause system interruptions, delays and loss of critical data, and could prevent us from accepting and fulfilling customer orders, process and receive shipments of products, process financial and credit card transactions and providing services, which could make our product offerings less attractive and subject us to liability as well as result in lost customer confidence. Additionally, changes in technology could cause our information systems to become obsolete and it may be necessary to incur additional costs to upgrade such systems, and if our information systems prove inadequate to handle our growth, we could lose customers, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Our systems are not fully redundant and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient. In addition, we may have inadequate insurance coverage to compensate for any related losses. Any of these events could damage our reputation, be expensive to remedy and have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Table of Contents

If we fail to protect the integrity and security of customer-related and other confidential information, we could be exposed to litigation, increased costs and reputational damage, and our business, results of operations and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected.
The use of individually identifiable data by us, our customers, our Health Enthusiasts and others is regulated at the state, federal and international levels. Privacy and information security laws and regulations change from time to time, and increasing costs of compliance with those laws and regulations and related technology investments could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations. Additionally, the success of our e-commerce operations depends upon the secure transmission of confidential information over public networks, including the use of cashless payments, and we use computers in substantially all other aspects of our business operations, including for point-of-sale processing in our stores. Such uses give rise to cybersecurity risks, including security breach, espionage, system disruption, theft and inadvertent release of information. While we have taken significant steps to protect customers’ personal information, consumer preferences and credit card information, and other confidential information including our employees’ private information and financial and strategic data about the Company and our business partners, the intentional or negligent actions of Health Enthusiasts, our suppliers or others may undermine our security measures. As a result, unauthorized parties may obtain access to our data systems and misappropriate confidential data. Furthermore, because the methods used to obtain unauthorized access change frequently and may not be immediately detected, we may be unable to anticipate these methods or implement preventative measures, and our incident response efforts may not be entirely effective. Any preventative measures we implement may have the potential to negatively affect our relations with our customers or decrease activity on our websites by making them less user-friendly. If our data security is compromised, it could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, results of operations and financial condition, materially increase the costs we incur to protect against those events in the future and subject us to additional legal risk and a competitive disadvantage. In addition, our customers could lose confidence in our ability to protect their personal information, which could cause them to stop shopping at our stores or online. The loss of confidence from a data security breach involving Health Enthusiasts could hurt our, and their, reputationreputations and as a result cause Health Enthusiast recruiting and retention challenges.
Natural disasters and unusually adverse weather conditions could cause permanent or temporary damage to our distribution centers or stores, impair our ability to purchase, receive or replenish inventory or cause customer traffic to decline, all of which could result in lost sales and otherwise materially and adversely affect our results of operations.
The occurrence of one or more natural disasters, such as hurricanes, fires, floods, earthquakes, tornadoes, high winds and other severe weather, could materially and adversely affect our operations and results of operations. To the extent these events result in the closure of our distribution centers, our corporate headquarters, or a significant number of our stores, or to the extent they adversely affect one or more of our key suppliers, our operations and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected through an inability to make deliveries to our stores and through lost sales. In addition, these events could result in increases in fuel (or other energy) prices or a fuel shortage, delays in opening new stores, the temporary lack of an adequate work force in a market, the temporary or long-term disruption in the supply of products from suppliers, delay in the delivery of goods to our distribution centers or stores, the temporary reduction in the availability of products in our stores and disruption to our information systems, as noted above. These events also could have indirect consequences, such as increases in the cost of insurance, if they were to result in significant loss of property or other insurable damage.
Table of Contents

Our e-commerce business is dependent on certain third parties. Changes in business practices or terms by such third parties could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.
Our e-commerce business has several third-party relationships that contribute to our ability to generate revenue from a variety of online sources. These relationships may be dependent upon third-party tools, such as search engines, or established business terms negotiated by the Company, or utilization of third party marketplaces. If the economics of these relationships or the use of the third-party tools used to drive revenue change materially, this could affect our decision to maintain these relationships, and could result in lost sales and otherwise materially and adversely affect our financial performance.
If we do not successfully develop and maintain a relevant omni-channel experience for our customers, our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.
Omni-channel retailing is rapidly evolving, and we must keep pace with changing customer expectations and new developments by our competitors. Our customers are increasingly using computers, tablets, mobile phones, and other devices to shop online. As part of our omni-channel strategy, we are making technology investments. If we are unable to make, improve, or develop relevant customer-facing technology in a timely manner, our ability to compete and our business and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In addition, if our e-commerce businesses or our other customer-facing technology systems do not function as designed, we may experience a loss of customer confidence, lost sales, or data security breaches, any of which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Table of Contents

We have significant lease obligations, which may require us to continue paying rent for store locations that we no longer operate.
Our stores are leased. We are subject to risks associated with our current and future real estate leases. Our costs could increase because of changes in the real estate markets and supply or demand for real estate sites. We generally cannot cancel our leases, so if we decide to close or relocate a location, we may nonetheless be committed to perform our obligations under the applicable lease including paying the base rent for the remaining lease term. As each lease expires, we may fail to negotiate renewals, either on commercially acceptable terms or any terms at all and may not be able to find replacement locations that will provide for the same success as current store locations. Of the current leases for our stores, 30 expire in Fiscal 2017, 9544 expire in Fiscal 2018, 103 expire in Fiscal 2019, 93 expire in Fiscal 2020, 90 expire in Fiscal 2021, 107 expire in Fiscal 2019, 95 expire in Fiscal 2020, 94 expire in Fiscal 20212022 and the balance expire in Fiscal 20222023 or thereafter.
Our international operations may result in additional market risks, which may harm our business.
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, we had 78 international franchise stores in Panama, 5 in Guatemala, 3 in Paraguay and 2 in Costa Rica, and 2 in Paraguay,also sell and also distribute products to other countries and manufacture products for third parties in other countries. In addition, ifIf the opportunity arises, we may expand our operations into new and high-growth international markets. However, we are subject to risks associated with international operations, including but not limited to: (i) fluctuations in currency exchange rates; (ii) changes in international staffing and employment issues; (iii) tariff and other trade barriers; (iv) greater difficulty in using and enforcing our intellectual property rights; (v) failure to understand the local culture and market; (vi) inconsistent product regulation or sudden policy changes by foreign agencies or governments; (vii) compliance with U.S. laws applicable to international operations, including the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and regulations promulgated by the Office of Foreign Asset Control; (viii) compliance with foreign laws, including tax laws and financial accounting standards; and (ix) political and economic instability and developments. Any of these risks could have a material adverse effect on our international operations and our growth strategy.
In addition, there is no assurance thatIf we will expand our operations in new international markets. To expand our operations into new international markets, we may enter into business combination transactions, make acquisitions or enter into strategic partnerships, joint ventures or alliances, any of which may be material. We may enter into these transactions to acquire other businesses or products to expand our products or take advantage of new developments and potential changes in the industry. Our lack of experience operating in new international markets and our lack of familiarity with local economic, political and regulatory systems could prevent us from achieving the results that we expect on our anticipated time frame or at all. If we are unsuccessful in expanding into new or high-growth international markets, it could adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.
Legal and Regulatory Risks
We may incur material product liability claims, which could increase our costs and adversely affect our reputation with our customers, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Table of Contents

As a retailer, direct marketer and manufacturer of products designed for human consumption, we are subject to product liability claims if the use of our products or the products that we manufacture for third parties is alleged to have resulted in injury or to include inadequate instructions for use or inadequate warnings concerning possible side effects and interactions with other substances. Most of our products and the products that we manufacture for third parties are vitamins, minerals, herbs and other ingredients that are classified as foods or dietary supplements and are not subject to pre-market regulatory approval in the U. S. Our products or the products that we manufacture for third parties could contain contaminated substances, and some of our products and the products that we manufacture for third parties contain ingredients that do not have long histories of human consumption. Previously unknown adverse reactions resulting from human consumption of these ingredients could occur. In addition, third-party manufacturers produce many of the products we sell. We rely on these manufacturers to ensure the integrity of their ingredients and formulations. As a distributor of products manufactured by third parties, we may also be liable for various product liability claims for products we do not manufacture. While we attempt to manage these risks by obtaining indemnification agreements from the manufacturers of products that we sell (other than our own branded products) and insurance, third parties may not satisfy their indemnification obligations to us and/or our insurance policies may not be sufficient or available. A product liability claim against us, whether with respect to products of a third party that we sell, our branded products or products that we manufacture for third parties, could result in increased costs and could adversely affect our reputation with our customers, which in turn could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be able to obtain insurance coverage in the future at current rates, or we may experience unfavorable claims.
Table of Contents

While we believe we will be able to obtain liability insurance in the future, because of increased selectivity by insurance providers we may only be able to obtain such insurance at increased rates and/or with reduced coverage levels. Additionally, we may experience unfavorable claims. Changes in insurance rates, reduced coverage levels, or unfavorable claims could reduce our income from operations.
Compliance with governmental regulations could increase our costs significantly and adversely affect our operating income.
The processing, formulation, manufacturing, packaging, labeling, advertising and distribution of our products and the products that we manufacture for third parties are subject to federal laws and regulation by one or more federal agencies, including the FDA, the FTC, the USDA and the EPA. These activities are also regulated by various state, local and international laws and agencies of the states and localities in which our products and the products that we manufacture for third parties are sold. Regulations may prevent or delay the introduction, or require the reformulation, of our products or the products that we manufacture for third parties, which could result in lost sales and increased costs to us. A regulatory agency may not accept the evidence of safety for any new ingredients that we may want to market, may determine that a particular ingredient is not a legal dietary ingredient under DSHEA, may determine that a particular product or product ingredient presents an unacceptable health risk, may determine that a particular statement of nutritional support on our products or that parties use on the products we manufacture for them, or that we want to use on our products or that third parties want to use on the products we manufacture for them, is an unacceptable drug claim or an unauthorized version of a food “health claim.” A regulatory agency may determine that particular claims are not adequately supported by available scientific evidence. Any such regulatory determination would prevent us or third parties, as applicable, from marketing particular products or using certain statements on those products, or force us to recall a particular product, which could adversely affect our sales of those products
We are subject to environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, which could subject us to liabilities, increase our costs or restrict our operations in the future.
Our operations are subject to a variety of environmental, health and safety laws and regulations in each of the jurisdictions in which we operate. These laws and regulations govern, among other things, air emissions, wastewater discharges, the handling and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes, soil and groundwater contamination and employee health and safety. We are also subject to laws and regulations governing the handling and disposal of raw materials, non-compliant products and waste, the handling of regulated material that is included in our products or products that we manufacture for third parties and the disposal of products at the end of their useful life. These laws and regulations have increasingly become more stringent, and we may incur additional expenses to ensure compliance with existing or new requirements in the future. Any failure by us to comply with environmental, health and safety requirements could result in the limitation or suspension of our operations, including operations at our manufacturing facility. We also could incur monetary fines, civil or criminal sanctions, third-party claims or cleanup or other costs as a result of violations of or liabilities under such requirements. In addition, compliance with environmental, health and safety requirements could restrict our ability to expand our facilities or require us to acquire costly pollution control equipment, incur other significant expenses or modify our manufacturing processes.
Table of Contents

Our manufacturing facilities use, store and dispose of hazardous substances in connection with the manufacturing processes. It is possible that these facilities may expose us to environmental liabilities associated with historical site conditions that have not yet been discovered. Some environmental laws impose liability for contamination on current and former owners and operators of affected sites, regardless of fault. If remediation costs or potential claims for personal injury or property or natural resource damages resulting from contamination arise, they may be material and may not be recoverable under any contractual indemnity or otherwise from prior owners or operators or any insurance policy. Additionally, we may not be able to successfully enforce any such indemnity or insurance policy in the future. In the event that new or previously unknown contamination is discovered or new cleanup obligations are otherwise imposed at any of our currently or previously owned or operated facilities, we may be required to take additional, unplanned remedial measures and record charges for which no reserves have been recorded.
Congress and/or regulatory agencies may impose additional laws or regulations or change current laws or regulations, and state attorneys general may increase enforcement of existing or new laws, and compliance with new or changed governmental regulations, or any state attorney proceeding, could increase our costs significantly and materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
From time to time, Congress, the FDA, the FTC, or other federal, state, local or foreign legislative and regulatory authorities may impose additional laws or regulations that apply to us, repeal laws or regulations that we consider favorable to us or impose more stringent interpretations of current laws or regulations. We are not able to predict the nature of such future laws, regulations, repeals or interpretations or to predict the effect that additional governmental regulation, when and if it
Table of Contents

occurs, would have on our business in the future. Those developments could require reformulation of certain products to meet new standards, recalls or discontinuance of certain products (including products that we sell and products that we manufacture for third parties) not able to be reformulated, additional record-keeping requirements, increased documentation of the properties of certain products, additional or different labeling, additional scientific substantiation, adverse event reporting or other new requirements. Any developments of this nature could increase our costs significantly and could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
In July 2011, the FDA issued draft guidance governing the notification of new dietary ingredients (“NDIs”) and in August 2016, the FDA issued revised draft guidance. We believe that the draft guidance, if implemented as proposed, would have a material impact on our operations. FDA enforcement of the NDI guidance as written could require us to incur additional expenses, which could be significant, and negatively affect our business in several ways, including, but not limited to, the detention and refusal of admission of imported products, the injunction of manufacturing of any dietary ingredients or dietary supplements until the FDA determines that those ingredients or products are in compliance, and the potential imposition of penalties for non-compliance.
Our failure to comply with FTC regulations could result in substantial monetary penalties and could adversely affect our operating results.
The FTC exercises jurisdiction over the advertising of dietary supplements and has instituted numerous enforcement actions against dietary supplement companies, including us, for failure to have adequate substantiation for claims made in advertising or for the use of false or misleading advertising claims. Failure by us to comply with applicable regulations could result in substantial monetary penalties, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
We may be subject to intellectual property litigation and infringement claims by others.
We may be subject to intellectual property litigation and infringement claims initiated by others, other competitors or entities may assert rights in, or ownership of, our trademarks and other intellectual property rights or in marks that are similar to ours, and we may not be able to successfully resolve these types of conflicts to our satisfaction. Claims and litigation of this nature could cause us to incur significant expenses or prevent us from manufacturing, selling or using some of our products or the products that we manufacture for third parties, which could, in turn, adversely affect our sales and profitability.
Changes in accounting standards and estimates could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial position.
Generally accepted accounting principles and the related authoritative guidance for many aspects of our business, including revenue recognition, inventories, goodwill and intangible assets, leases, income taxes and stock-based compensation, are complex and involve subjective judgments. Changes in these rules or changes in the underlying estimates, assumptions or judgments by our management could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations. For example, recently issued authoritative guidance for lease accounting will result in a significant increase to long-term assets and liabilities given we have a significant number of leases.
Table of Contents

The accounting method for our convertible debt securities that may be settled in cash could have a material effect on our reported financial results.
In May 2008, the Financial Accounting Standards Board, which we refer to as FASB, issued FASB Staff Position No. APB 14-1, Accounting for Convertible Debt Instruments That May Be Settled in Cash Upon Conversion (Including Partial Cash Settlement), which has subsequently been codified as Accounting Standards Codification 470-20, Debt with Conversion and Other Options, which we refer to as ASC 470-20.
Under ASC 470-20, an entity must separately account for the liability and equity components of the convertible debt instruments (including our Convertible Notes) that may be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion in a manner that reflects the Company’s economic interest cost. The effect of ASC 470-20 on the accounting for the Convertible Notes is that the equity component is required to be included in the additional paid-in capital section of stockholders’ equity on our consolidated balance sheet, and the value of the equity component would be treated as original issue discount for purposes of accounting for the debt component of the Convertible Notes. As a result, we are required to record a greater amount of non-cash interest expense in current periods presented as a result of the amortization of the discounted carrying value of the Convertible Notes to their face amount over the term of the Convertible Notes. We report lower net income in our financial results because ASC 470-20 requires interest to include both the current period’s amortization of the debt discount and the instrument’s coupon interest, which could adversely affect our reported or future financial results and the trading price of our common stock.
Table of Contents

In addition, under certain circumstances, convertible debt instruments (including the Convertible Notes) that may be settled entirely or partly in cash are currently accounted for utilizing the treasury stock method, the effect of which is that the shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes are not included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share except to the extent that the conversion value of the Convertible Notes exceeds their principal amount. Under the treasury stock method, for diluted earnings per share purposes, the transaction is accounted for as if the number of shares of common stock that would be necessary to settle such excess, if we elected to settle such excess in shares, are issued. We cannot be sure that the accounting standards in the future will continue to permit the use of the treasury stock method. If we are unable to use the treasury stock method in accounting for the shares issuable upon conversion of the Convertible Notes, then our diluted earnings per share would be adversely affected.
Risks Related to our Capital Structure
Our debt, and potential future additional indebtedness, could adversely affect our results of operations and financial condition and otherwise adversely impact our operating income and growth prospects.
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, our total consolidated indebtedness was $133.4$140.3 million, consisting of borrowings under our Convertible Senior Notes, our Revolving Credit Facility and our capital lease liabilities.
Our current and potential future debt financing could: 
increase our vulnerability to general adverse economic, industry and competitive conditions;
require us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of our cash flow to fund working capital, new store growth and other capital expenditures, research and development efforts and other general corporate purposes;
limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;
place us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that have less debt; and
limit our ability to borrow additional funds.
Restrictions in the agreements governing our existing and future indebtedness may prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business.
The agreements governing our existing indebtedness contain, and the agreements governing our future indebtedness will likely contain, customary restrictions on us or our subsidiaries, including covenants that restrict us or our subsidiaries, as the case may be, from incurring additional indebtedness, granting liens on our assets, making investments, consolidating or merging with another business, selling or otherwise disposing of our assets, paying dividends and entering into transactions with our affiliates.
Our ability to comply with these covenants and other provisions of our Revolving Credit Facility may be affected by changes in our operating and financial performance, changes in general business and economic conditions, adverse regulatory developments or other events beyond our control. The breach of any of these covenants could result in a default under our debt, which could cause those and other obligations to become immediately due and payable. In addition, these restrictions may
Table of Contents

prevent us from taking actions that we believe would be in the best interest of our business and may make it difficult for us to successfully execute our business strategy or effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted.
Our ability to continue to access credit on the terms previously obtained for the funding of our operations and capital projects may be limited due to changes in credit markets.
In the past, the credit markets and the financial services industry have experienced disruption characterized by the bankruptcy, failure, collapse or sale of various financial institutions, increased volatility in securities prices, diminished liquidity and credit availability and intervention from the U.S. and other governments. Continued concerns about the systemic impact of potential long-term or widespread downturn, energy costs, geopolitical issues, the availability and cost of credit, the global commercial and residential real estate markets and related mortgage markets and reduced consumer confidence have contributed to increased market volatility. The cost and availability of credit has been and may continue to be adversely affected by these conditions. We cannot be certain that funding for our capital needs will be available from our existing financial institutions and the credit markets if needed, and if available, to the extent required and on acceptable terms. The Revolving Credit Facility matures in 2018,2022, and the Convertible Notes mature in 2020. If we cannot renew or refinance this facility and our notes upon their maturities or, more generally, obtain funding when needed, in each case on acceptable terms, we may be unable to continue our current rate of growth, whichsuch conditions may have an adverse effect on our revenues and results of operations.
Servicing our debt requires a significant amount of cash, and we may not have sufficient cash flow from our business to pay our substantial debt.
Table of Contents

Our ability to make scheduled payments of the principal of, to pay interest on or to refinance our indebtedness, including the Convertible Notes, depends on our future performance, which is subject to economic, financial, competitive and other factors beyond our control. Our business may not continue to generate cash flow from operations in the future sufficient to service our debt and make necessary capital expenditures. If we are unable to generate such cash flow, we may be required to adopt one or more alternatives, such as selling assets, restructuring debt or obtaining additional equity capital on terms that may be onerous or highly dilutive. Our ability to refinance our indebtedness will depend on the capital markets and our financial condition at such time. We may not be able to engage in any of these activities or engage in these activities on desirable terms, which could result in a default on our debt obligations.
Despite our current debt levels, we may still incur substantially more debt or take other actions which would intensify the risks discussed above.
Despite our current consolidated debt levels, we and our subsidiaries may be able to incur substantial additional debt in the future, subject to the restrictions contained in our Revolving Credit Facility. We will not be restricted under the terms of the indenture governing the Convertible Notes from incurring additional debt, securing existing or future debt, recapitalizing our debt or taking a number of other actions that are not limited by the terms of the indenture governing the Convertible Notes. Our Revolving Credit Facility restricts our ability to incur additional indebtedness, including secured indebtedness, but if the facility matures or is repaid, we may not be subject to such restrictions under the terms of any subsequent indebtedness.
In December 2015, we issued $143.8 million of 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020, which could dilute our existing stockholders’ equity and lower our reported earnings per share.
We issued $143.8 million of indebtedness in December 2015 in the form of 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020. The issuance of the Convertible Notes substantially increased our principal payment obligations. The holders of the Convertible Notes are entitled to convert the Convertible Notes into shares of our common stock under certain circumstances which would dilute our existing stockholders and lower our reported per share earnings.
In addition, in the event the conditional conversion feature of the Convertible Notes is triggered, holders of Convertible Notes will be entitled to convert the Convertible Notes at any time during specified periods at their option. If one or more holders elect to convert their Convertible Notes, unless we elect to satisfy our conversion obligation by delivering solely shares of our common stock (other than paying cash in lieu of delivering any fractional share), we would be required to settle a portion or all of our conversion obligation through the payment of cash, which could adversely affect our liquidity. In addition, even if holders do not elect to convert their Convertible Notes, we could be required under applicable accounting rules to reclassify all or a portion of the outstanding principal of the Convertible Notes as a current rather than long-term liability, which would result in a material reduction of our net working capital.
Table of Contents

The convertible notes hedge and warrant transactions we entered into in connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes may affect the value of the Convertible Notes and our common stock.
In connection with the pricing of the Convertible Notes, we entered into convertible note hedge transactions with the option counterparties. The convertible note hedge transactions are expected generally to reduce the potential dilution upon conversion of the Convertible Notes and/or offset any cash payments we are required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted Convertible Notes, as the case may be. We also entered into warrant transactions with the option counterparties. However, the warrant transactions could separately have a dilutive effect on our common stock to the extent that the market price per share of our common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrants.
In addition, the option counterparties or their respective affiliates may modify their hedge positions by entering into or unwinding various derivatives with respect to our common stock and/or purchasing or selling our common stock or other securities of ours in secondary market transactions prior to the maturity of the Convertible Notes (and are likely to do so during any observation period related to a conversion of the Convertible Notes). This activity could also cause or avoid an increase or a decrease in the market price of our common stock or the Convertible Notes, which could affect the noteholders’ ability to convert the Convertible Notes and, to the extent the activity occurs during any observation period related to a conversion of the Convertible Notes, it could affect the number of shares and value of the consideration that the holders will receive upon conversion of the Convertible Notes.
In addition, if any such convertible note hedge and warrant transactions fail to become effective, the option counterparties may unwind their hedge positions with respect to our common stock, which could adversely affect the value of our common stock and the value of the Convertible Notes.
Table of Contents

Hedging instruments often involve counterparty risks.
We will be subject to risk with respect to our counterparties to the convertible notes hedge transactions. Counterparty risk is the risk that the other party in a derivative transaction will not fulfill its contractual obligation. Changes in the credit quality of our counterparties with respect to their derivative transactions may affect the value of those instruments. By entering into derivatives, we assume the risk that these counterparties could experience financial hardships that could call into question their continued ability to perform their obligations.
If a counterparty becomes bankrupt or otherwise fails to perform its obligations under a derivative contract due to financial difficulties, it is likely to result in a default under such derivative contract, unless such default is cured. Default by a party with whom we enter into a hedging transaction may result in the loss of unrealized profits, leaving us with unsecured exposure and force us to cover our resale commitments, if any, at the then current market price. It may not always be possible to dispose of or close out a hedging position without the consent of the hedging counterparty, and we may not be able to enter into an offsetting contract in order to cover our risk. We cannot assure our shareholders that aA liquid secondary market willmay not exist for hedging instruments purchased or sold, and we may be required to maintain a position until exercise or expiration, which could result in losses.
Furthermore, upon the bankruptcy of a counterparty, we may experience significant delays in obtaining any recovery under the derivative contract in a dissolution, assignment for the benefit of creditors, liquidation, winding-up, bankruptcy, or other analogous proceeding. In addition, in the event of the insolvency of a counterparty to a derivative transaction, the derivative transaction would typically be terminated at its fair market value. If we are owed this fair market value in the termination of the derivative transaction and these claims are unsecured, we will be treated as general creditors of such counterparty, and will not have any claim with respect to the underlying security. We may obtain only a limited recovery or may obtain no recovery in such circumstances and the enforceability of agreements for hedging transactions may depend on compliance with applicable statutory and other regulatory requirements and, depending on the identity of the counterparty, applicable international requirements.
Our failure to meet market expectations could adversely affect the market price and volatility of our stock.
We believe that the price of our stock generally reflects market expectations for our future operating results. Any failure to meet, or delay in meeting, these expectations, including our comparable store sales growth rates, gross margin, earnings and earnings per share or new store openings, could cause the market price of our stock to decline, as could changes in our stock repurchase policies. 
Item 1B.    Unresolved Staff Comments
None.

Item 2.        Properties
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, there were 775785 Vitamin Shoppe and Super Supplements retail stores open in the United States and Puerto Rico. See “Item 1—Business—Store Counts and Locations” for additional information on the growth in our network of stores for Fiscal 20122013 through 20162017 and the location of our stores as of December 31, 2016.30, 2017. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, we leased the property for all of our stores. We do not believe that any individual store property is material to our financial condition or results of operation, however, more highly populated geographic areas may have a higher concentration of store locations. Of the leases for our stores as of December 31, 2016, 30, expire in Fiscal 2017, 9544 expire in Fiscal 2018, 107103 expire in Fiscal 2019, 9593 expire in Fiscal 2020, 9490 expire in Fiscal 2021, 107 expire in 2022 and the balance expire in Fiscal 20222023 or thereafter. We have options to extend most of these leases for a minimum of five years.

Our leased properties also include the following:
Location Description 
Square
Footage
 
Lease Termination 
Year
 Renewal Options Description 
Square
Footage
 
Lease Termination 
Year
 Renewal Options
North Bergen, New Jersey(1) 
Warehouse, Distribution 
Center and Corporate Offices
 230,000
 2018 One Five-Year Renewal Option 
Warehouse, Distribution 
Center and Corporate Offices
 230,000
 2018 None
Ashland, Virginia 
Warehousing and 
Distribution Center
 312,000
 2028 Three Five-Year Renewal Options 
Warehousing and 
Distribution Center
 312,000
 2028 Three Five-Year Renewal Options
Avondale, Arizona Warehousing and Distribution Center 187,000
 2029 Three Five-Year Renewal Options Warehousing and Distribution Center 187,000
 2029 Three Five-Year Renewal Options
Secaucus, New Jersey Corporate Headquarters 71,000
 2029 Two Five-Year Renewal Options Corporate Headquarters and Corporate Offices 106,000
 2029 Two Five-Year Renewal Options and One Five-Year Renewal Option
Miami Lakes, Florida Manufacturing Facilities 212,000
 2018 and 2021 Two Five-Year Renewal Options and Three Five-Year Renewal Options Manufacturing Facilities 212,000
 2021 None

The Company closed its three stores in Ontario, Canada and the Seattle, Washington distribution center in Fiscal 2016.
(1)In 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration.    
We believe that all of our current facilities are in good condition.
Item 3.        Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various lawsuits arising from time to time in the normal course of business, manysome of which are covered by insurance. As of December 31, 2016, the Company was not party to any material legal proceedings. Although the impact of the final resolution of these matters on the Company’sCompany's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
In addition, on or about August 22, 2017, a federal securities class action suit was filed in the United States District Court in the District of New Jersey against Vitamin Shoppe and certain officers and directors on behalf of purchasers of Vitamin Shoppe common stock between March 1, 2017 and August 6, 2017. The lawsuit seeks remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including monetary damages, alleging that the defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the Company's reported goodwill, initiatives designed to improve the Company's financial performance, the Company’s profitability trends, and its financial results. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we are vigorously defending the lawsuit.
Item 4.        Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
Table of Contents

PART II
Item 5.        Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity
Securities

Market Information
Since October 28, 2009, our common stock has been traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the trading symbol “VSI”. At December 31, 2016,30, 2017, there were 23,424,05524,021,948 common shares outstanding, and the closing sale price of our common stock was $23.75.$4.40. Also as of that date, we had approximately 189181 common shareholders of record. The table below sets forth the high and low sale prices of our common stock for the periods indicated:
Fiscal periodHigh LowHigh Low
2017 Quarter ended:   
March$24.85
 $18.25
June20.70
 9.80
September12.00
 4.95
December5.75
 2.95
2016 Quarter ended:      
March$33.67
 $26.02
$33.67
 $26.02
June31.66
 27.13
31.66
 27.13
September32.31
 26.23
32.31
 26.23
December28.41
 21.90
28.41
 21.90
2015 Quarter ended:   
March$48.85
 $39.64
June44.54
 37.57
September38.87
 32.73
December34.41
 26.57

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table summarizes the Company’s purchases of shares of common stock during the quarter ended December 31, 201630, 2017 :
Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
(1)
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit)
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part 
of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (2)
 
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in thousands)
(2)
September 25, 2016 through October 22, 2016
 $
 
 $40,066
October 23, 2016 through November 19, 2016
 $
 
 $40,066
November 20, 2016 through December 31, 2016399,546
 $25.10
 398,371
 $30,066
Totals399,546
   398,371
  
Period
Total Number
of Shares (or
Units)
Purchased
(1)
 
Average Price
Paid per Share
(or Unit)
 
Total Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part 
of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs (2)
 
Maximum Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (in thousands)
(2)
October 1, 2017 through October 28, 2017
 $
 
 $100,066
October 29, 2017 through November 25, 20173,347
 $4.40
 
 $100,066
November 26, 2017 through December 30, 2017
 $
 
 $100,066
Totals3,347
   
  
 
(1)Includes 1,175 sharesShares withheld to cover required tax payments on behalf of employees as their restricted shares vest.
(2)On August 5, 2014, May 6, 2015 and November 23, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved share repurchase programs that enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of its shares of common stock from time to time over three year periods ending on August 4, 2017, May 5, 2018 and November 22, 2018, respectively. On May 5, 2017, the Company's board of directors authorized the repurchase of up to an additional $70.0 million of equity and equity-linked securities. This repurchase authorization expires on November 22, 2018.

Stock Performance Graph
The line graph below compares the cumulative total stockholder return on the Company’s common stock with the Russell 2000 Index (RUT), S&P Retail Index (SPXRT) and the NYSE Composite Index (NYA) for the five year period from December 31, 201129, 2012 through December 31, 2016.30, 2017. The graph assumes an investment of $100 made at the closing of trading on
Table of Contents

December 30, 2011,28, 2012, in (i) the Company’s common stock, (ii) the stocks comprising the RUT, (iii) the stocks comprising the SPXRT and (iv) the stocks comprising the NYA. All values assume reinvestment of the full amount of all dividends, if any, into
Table of Contents

additional shares of the same class of equity securities at the frequency with which dividends are paid on those securities during the applicable time period.


12/31/2011 12/29/2012 12/28/2013 12/27/2014 12/26/2015 12/31/201612/29/2012 12/28/2013 12/27/2014 12/26/2015 12/31/2016 12/30/2017
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.100.00
 140.37
 128.99
 118.28
 84.03
 59.55
100.00
 91.89
 84.26
 59.86
 42.43
 7.86
Russell 2000 Index100.00
 112.31
 156.71
 164.01
 155.85
 183.17
100.00
 139.54
 146.04
 138.78
 163.10
 184.53
S&P Retail Index100.00
 122.23
 178.55
 196.28
 244.93
 256.69
100.00
 146.08
 160.58
 200.38
 210.00
 271.10
NYSE Composite Index100.00
 111.22
 138.47
 146.92
 137.20
 147.88
100.00
 124.50
 132.10
 123.36
 132.96
 154.02
    
This graph and the accompanying table are not “soliciting material”, are not deemed filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by us under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.
Share Repurchase Programs
OnBeginning in August 5, 2014, May 6, 2015 and November 23, 2015, the Company’s board of directors approved share repurchase programs that enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $300$370 million of its shares of common stock and/or its Convertible Notes, from time to time over three year periods ending on August 4, 2017, May 5, 2018 and November 22, 2018, respectively.time. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, 8,064,325 shares of common stock pursuant to these programs, and no Convertible Notes, have been repurchased for a total of $269.9 million. The shares were retired upon repurchase. For additional information, refer to Note 11., “Share Repurchase Program”Programs”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Dividends
We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future.
Table of Contents

Item 6.        Selected Financial Data
We have derived the selected financial data presented below from our consolidated financial statements for the Fiscal Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015, December 27, 2014, and December 28, 2013, and December 29, 2012.
Table of Contents

2013. Financial results for all fiscal years presented are based on a 52-week period, with the exception of financial results for the Fiscal Year ended December 31, 2016 which are based on a 53-week period, unless otherwise stated. The selected financial data for the Fiscal Years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 presented below, should be read in conjunction with such consolidated financial statements and notes included herein and in conjunction with Item 7., “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”.
 Fiscal Year Ended
 
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
 
December 28,
2013
 
December 29,
2012
 (data presented in thousands, except for share, per share data, number of stores and average store square  footage)
Statement of Operations Data:         
Net sales$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $1,213,046
 $1,087,469
 $950,902
Cost of goods sold862,887
 847,634
 808,787
 709,823
 617,920
Gross profit426,356
 418,915
 404,259
 377,646
 332,982
Selling, general and administrative expenses (1)380,779
 329,922
 301,603
 267,354
 233,610
Income from operations45,577
 88,993
 102,656
 110,292
 99,372
Interest expense, net9,523
 1,105
 495
 495
 659
Income before provision for income taxes36,054
 87,888
 102,161
 109,797
 98,713
Provision for income taxes11,090
 34,717
 40,920
 43,251
 37,888
Net income$24,964
 $53,171
 $61,241
 $66,546
 $60,825
Weighted average shares outstanding:         
Basic23,875,540
 28,954,804
 30,239,183
 29,992,620
 29,473,711
Diluted24,067,686
 29,203,429
 30,664,105
 30,541,057
 30,110,237
Net income per share:         
Basic$1.05
 $1.84
 $2.03
 $2.22
 $2.06
Diluted$1.04
 $1.82
 $2.00
 $2.18
 $2.02
Other Financial Data:         
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets$38,780
 $38,495
 $34,219
 $28,026
 $23,076
Acquisition and integration related costs (2)$
 $1,874
 $10,242
 $4,336
 $1,281
Operating Data:         
Number of stores at end of period775
 758
 717
 659
 579
Total retail square feet at end of period2,709
 2,662
 2,568
 2,390
 2,130
Average store square footage at end of period3,495
 3,511
 3,582
 3,627
 3,679
Net sales per store (3)$1,431
 $1,426
 $1,453
 $1,471
 $1,468
Comparable store sales (4)(1.5)% 0.1 % 2.8% 3.5% 8.2%
E-commerce comparable sales (5)3.8 % (0.6)% 11.2% 14.4% na
Balance Sheet Data:         
Working capital$151,548
 $157,089
 $125,382
 $172,341
 $153,453
Total assets734,184
 748,691
 722,391
 682,064
 586,285
Total debt, including capital lease obligations133,371
 123,525
 8,195
 347
 168
Stockholders’ equity439,996
 475,301
 551,934
 528,340
 447,418
Table of Contents

 Fiscal Year Ended
 
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
 
December 28,
2013
 (data presented in thousands, except for share, per share data, number of stores and average store square  footage)
Statement of Operations Data:         
Net sales$1,178,694
 $1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $1,213,046
 $1,087,469
Cost of goods sold821,137
 862,887
 847,634
 808,787
 709,823
Gross profit357,557
 426,356
 418,915
 404,259
 377,646
Selling, general and administrative expenses345,494
 340,752
 328,745
 301,184
 267,354
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-assets impairment charges274,876
 40,027
 1,177
 419
 
Income (loss) from operations(262,813) 45,577
 88,993
 102,656
 110,292
Interest expense, net9,701
 9,523
 1,105
 495
 495
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(272,514) 36,054
 87,888
 102,161
 109,797
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(20,363) 11,090
 34,717
 40,920
 43,251
Net income (loss)$(252,151) $24,964
 $53,171
 $61,241
 $66,546
Weighted average shares outstanding:         
Basic23,137,977
 23,875,540
 28,954,804
 30,239,183
 29,992,620
Diluted23,137,977
 24,067,686
 29,203,429
 30,664,105
 30,541,057
Net income (loss) per share:         
Basic$(10.90) $1.05
 $1.84
 $2.03
 $2.22
Diluted$(10.90) $1.04
 $1.82
 $2.00
 $2.18
Other Financial Data:         
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets$39,204
 $38,780
 $38,495
 $34,219
 $28,026
Acquisition and integration related costs (1)$
 $
 $1,874
 $10,242
 $4,336
Operating Data:         
Number of stores at end of period785
 775
 758
 717
 659
Total retail square feet at end of period2,737
 2,709
 2,662
 2,568
 2,390
Average store square footage at end of period3,486
 3,495
 3,511
 3,582
 3,627
Net sales per store (2)$1,303
 $1,431
 $1,426
 $1,453
 $1,471
Comparable store net sales (3)(6.9)% (1.5)% 0.1 % 2.8% 3.5%
VS.com comparable net sales (4)(12.3)% 7.3 % (6.5)% 9.0% 13.9%
Balance Sheet Data:         
Working capital$155,231
 $151,548
 $157,089
 $125,382
 $172,341
Total assets488,753
 734,184
 748,691
 722,391
 682,064
Total debt, including capital lease obligations140,327
 133,371
 123,525
 8,195
 347
Stockholders’ equity195,367
 439,996
 475,301
 551,934
 528,340
(1)Fiscal 2016 includes impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force.
(2)For Fiscal 2015, these amounts represent costs incurred related to the integration of Nutri-Force. In Fiscal 2014, these amounts related to acquisition costs of $3.4 million and integration costs of $1.4 million ($0.6 million for Nutri-Force and $0.8 million for Super Supplements), charges to cost of goods sold for the inventory valuation step-up of $4.5 million and the contingent consideration adjustment for the Nutri-Force acquisition of $1.0 million. In Fiscal 2013 and 2012, these amounts represent costs incurred related to the acquisition and integration of Super Supplements.
Table of Contents

million and the contingent consideration adjustment for the Nutri-Force acquisition of $1.0 million. In Fiscal 2013, these amounts represent costs incurred related to the acquisition and integration of Super Supplements.
(3)(2)Net sales per store are calculated by dividing retail net sales fulfilled in stores by the number of stores open at the end of the period.
(4)(3)A new retail store is included in comparable store net sales after 410 days of operation, and acquired retail stores from the Super Supplements acquisition are included in comparable store net sales after 365 days. For Fiscal 2016, comparable store net sales growth is based on a 52-week period.
(5)(4)For Fiscal 2016, e-commerceVS.com comparable net sales is based on a 52-week period.
For additional information on certain costs included in our operating results, refer to Note 17., “Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 7.        Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The discussion in this section contains forward-looking statements that are based upon current information and expectations. We sometimes identify forward-looking statements with such words as “may”, “expect”, “intend”, “anticipate”, “plan”, “believe”, “seek”, “should”, “estimate”, “outlook”, “trends”, “future benefits”, “strategies”, “goals” and similar words. The forward-looking statements contained herein, include, without limitation, statements concerning future revenue sources and concentration, gross profit margins, selling and marketing expenses, general and administrative expenses, capital resources, liquidity, capital expenditures, new stores, integration of acquisitions, retail inflation, additional financings or borrowings and are subject to risks and uncertainties including, but not limited to, those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K that could cause actual results to differ materially from the results contemplated by these forward-looking statements. We also urge you to carefully review the risk factors set forth in Item 1A. – “Risk Factors”. See also “Forward-Looking Statements” for additional information regarding forward-looking statements.
References to “Fiscal” or “Fiscal Year” mean the fifty-two weeks ended December 30, 2017, the fifty-three weeks ended December 31, 2016 and the fifty-two weeks ended December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 for Fiscal Year 2016,2017, Fiscal Year 20152016 and Fiscal Year 2014,2015, respectively.
Overview
We are a multi-channelan omni-channel specialty retailer and contract manufacturer of vitamins, minerals, herbs, specialty supplements, sports nutrition and other health and wellness products. We market approximately 900 nationally recognized brands as well as our own brands, which include The Vitamin Shoppe®Shoppe®, BodyTech®BodyTech®, True Athlete®Athlete®, Mytrition®Mytrition®, plnt®plnt®, ProBioCare®ProBioCare®, Next Step®Step® and Betancourt Nutrition®Nutrition®. We believe we offer one of the largest varieties of products among VMS retailers and continue to refine our assortment with approximately 7,000 SKUs offered in our typical store and approximately 10,000 additional SKUs available through e-commerce. Our broad product offering enables us to provide our customers with a depth of selection of products that may not be readily available at other specialty retailers or mass merchants, such as discount stores, supermarkets, drugstores and wholesale clubs. We believe our product offering and emphasis on product knowledge and customer service helps us meet the needs of our target customer and serves as a foundation for enhancing strong customer loyalty.
During Fiscal 2015, the Company began development of a strategic plan focusedWe continue to focus on upgrading our customers’ experience across our retail and e-commerce channels, the “reinvention strategy”. The Company worked with outside consultantsstrategy to analyze qualitative and quantitative information relevant to our customers’ experience. The reinvention strategy is focused on upgradingimprove the customer experience to inspire our target customers with changes to curate our product assortment, opportunities to increase private brands penetration, enhancements tothrough the in-storeroll-out of initiatives including increasing customer engagement and digitalpersonalization, redesigning the omni-channel experience store layout,(including in stores as well as changes to improvethrough the internet and mobile devices), growing our private brands and improving the effectiveness of pricing and promotions. As part of this strategy, we have developed several initiatives, including a new remodeled store format that is being piloted in 20 stores as of December 30, 2017. This new store format includes a new layout, revised product assortment and other instore experiences (hereafter referred to as "transformations").
In 2017, competitive trends have intensified, such as broader channel availability of supplement products, more aggressive competitor pricing and promotional strategies, and significantly increased expenditures in marketing by our loyaltycompetitors. Our operations have been negatively impacted, resulting in lower customer traffic and a reduction in net sales during Fiscal 2017. During Fiscal 2017 we have tested and launched several initiatives including new pricing and promotional strategies and a customer auto-delivery subscription program. The Company incurred approximately $9.0 millionWe also increased our marketing expense beginning in the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. We anticipate these initiatives will mitigate some of the negative performance we have experienced in areas such as customer traffic.
We continue to identify and implement opportunities to improve efficiencies and reduce costs in key areas including sourcing of inventory and cost savings opportunities related to selling, general and administrative costs duringexpenses. For Fiscal 2016 in connection with2017, the reinvention,Company realized incremental year over year cost of whichgoods sold savings of approximately $6.0$15.0 million and selling, general and administrative expenses savings of such costs are expected to be on-going. These costs include additional internal resources, improvements to store network connectivity, and outside consultants. The Company is in the processapproximately $4.0 million, for a total savings of testing several initiatives and expects to realize improved financial results from the reinvention beginning in Fiscal 2017. In addition, we have engaged a consulting firm in Fiscal 2016 to identify other efficiencies and cost reduction opportunities focusing on product sourcing, store operations, pricing and promotions, and corporate expenses.$19.0 million. During Fiscal 2016, we incurred $3.8 million of costs in connection with
Table of Contents

identifying other efficiencies and cost2017, the Company renegotiated rent expenses with a number of landlords resulting in lower occupancy costs of $9.5 million over the remaining lease periods, or approximately $0.9 million on average per year through 2027.
Impairment of long-lived assets:
During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company had experienced a significant reduction opportunities. Asto its market capitalization. Additionally, as a result of this cost reduction project, we have identified savings potential with an estimated valuechanged market conditions and the Company's updated initiatives for the second half of at least $24.0 million on an annualized basis.
In Fiscal 2015, we also performed a review of certain business operations. As part of this review,2017, the Company implemented changes to more closely align Super Supplements stores with current processes and assortments inrevised the Vitamin Shoppe retail stores. As a result, net costs of $1.8 million and $1.0 million were incurred during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2016, respectively. Annual cost savings resulting from these actions are estimated to be $1 million to $2 million. In addition, the Company decided to cease operations in Canada, and as a result, net costs of $0.9 million and $1.9 million were incurred in Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2016, respectively. In Fiscal 2016, the Company realized a $3.0 million tax benefit resulting from the write-off of the Canada investment. The annual cost savings related to ceasing operations in Canada are estimated to be approximately $1.0 million. Costs for these two initiatives include lease liabilities, markdown charges on inventory and employee severance.
On December 9, 2015, the Company issued $143.8 million of its 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of VSI. Interest is payable on the Notes on June 1 and December 1 of each year, commencing on June 1, 2016 until their maturity date of December 1, 2020. In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note hedge transactions for which it paid an aggregate $26.4 million. In addition, the Company sold warrants for which it received aggregate proceeds of $13.0 million. The net proceeds from the Convertible Notes of $125.7 million, net of commissions and offering costs of $4.6 million, was used to repurchase shares of our common stock under the Company’s share repurchase programs. For additional information, refer to Note 8., “Credit Arrangements” and Note 11., “Share Repurchase Programs” to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
The Company’s board of directors approved share repurchase programs that enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $300 million of its shares of common stock from time to time over three year periods ending on August 4, 2017, May 5, 2018 and November 22, 2018, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, 8,064,325 shares have been repurchased for a total of $269.9 million. The shares were retired upon repurchase. For additional information, refer to Note 11., “Share Repurchase Program”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
On June 6, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Nutri-Force, a company which provides custom manufacturing and private labeling of vitamins, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals and nutritional supplements, as well as, develops and markets its own branded products. The total purchase price was $86.1 million in cash. For additional information, refer to Note 3., “Acquisitions”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. During Fiscal 2015, we incurred $1.9 million of integration costs primarily related to professional fees. In addition, we incurred a $1.4 million charge in Fiscal 2015 to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts for Nutri-Force, related to one wholesale customer that abruptly ceased operations.
Since the acquisition in Fiscal 2014, Nutri-Force, our manufacturing reporting unit, has experienced disruption in its ability to optimize production capacity, volatility in sales performance, loss of third party customers, and correspondingly has experienced lower service levels to customers. In the fiscal fourth quarter, the Company performed valuation analyses, including our annual quantitative analysis of the manufacturing reporting unit as of October 22, 2016, based on the operating planoutlook for Fiscal 2017 and then a subsequent updated long range projection dueits long-range plan to further deteriorationreflect its operations in operatingthis increasingly competitive environment. Based on these factors, the Company concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore interim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The results whichof the interim goodwill impairment test indicated that the carrying value of Nutri-Forcethe retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value, and in accordance with the early adoption of ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment, the Company recorded an impairment charge on the goodwill of its retail segment of $164.3 million during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, of which $130.9 million is not deductible for income tax purposes.
During the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company experienced another significant reduction to its market capitalization. As a result, the Company concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore interim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The Company also had recently updated its long-range plan. The results of the interim goodwill and other intangible assets impairment tests indicated that the carrying value of the Vitamin Shoppe tradename exceeded its fair value and that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value. The Company proceeded to step tworecorded an impairment charge on the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $59.4 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. The Company also recorded an impairment charge for the remaining goodwill of its retail segment of $46.3 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
Should the financial performance of the retail reporting unit not meet or exceed current forecasts, or if the long-range plan is lowered, or if the rate used to discount cash flows is increased due to the associated risk, estimates of future cash flows may be insufficient to support the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $9.0 million as of December 30, 2017 and this may result in further impairment analysis. Basedcharges.
In addition, the Company recognized store impairment charges of $4.8 million during Fiscal 2017 on fixed assets related to 34 of its underperforming retail locations still in use in the resultsCompany's operations.
Manufacturing turnaround:
In the fourth quarter of these analyses,Fiscal 2016 the Company recorded impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses inas our manufacturing operations continued to perform below expectations. During the consolidated statementfirst quarter of income. For additional information, refer to Note 5., “Goodwill and Intangible Assets”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
TheFiscal 2017, the Company has engaged outside consultants to perform an assessment of the operations of Nutri-Force and to determineassist in the actions and resourcesdevelopment of initiatives required to turnaround this business unit. These initiatives were focused on improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes, eliminating unprofitable SKUs, reducing third-party customers, and reducing costs. The implementation of this plan began during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017 and has been substantially completed in Fiscal 2017. As a result, the Company will likely incur expenses, charges and capital expendituresincurred costs of approximately $12.3 million during Fiscal 2017 related to the turnaround of Nutri-Force.Nutri-Force including inventory charges, consulting expenses and other related charges.
The Company is currently exploring strategic alternatives related to Nutri-Force, including the potential sale of this subsidiary. Refer to Long-Lived Assets section of our Critical Accounting Policies included in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information.
Closing of distribution center:
In August 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration. Distribution operations have been transitioned to the Company's other distribution centers. Costs related to this closure, such as severance, inventory related costs and other charges are $3.1 million in Fiscal 2017. As a result of this closure, the Company anticipates annualized savings between $4.0 million to $5.0 million upon lease expiration.
Trends and Other Factors Affecting Our Business
Our performance is affected by industry trends including, among others, demographic, health and lifestyle preferences, as well as other factors, such as industry media coverage and governmental actions. For example, our industry is subject to
Table of Contents

potential regulatory activity and other legal matters that could affect the credibility of a given product or category of products. Consumer trends, the overall impact on consumer spending, which may be affected heavily by current economic conditions, and limited product innovation and introductions in the VMS industry can dramatically affect purchasing patterns. Even though our business model allows us to respond to changing industry trends by introducing new products and adjusting our product mix and sales incentives, such actions may not offset adverse trends.
Table of Contents

Additionally, our performance is affected by competitive trends such as the entry and expansion of competitors, changes in pricing and promotional strategies or expansion of product assortment by various competitors. Over recent years, there has been a shift of market share from specialty retailers to other channels such as mass market retailers, supermarket chains, club chains, drugstoredrug store chains and e-commerce companies. This broader competitive channel availability of VMS products represents a challenge for VSIthe Company to keep pace with industry growth rates. We also have observed more competition in our assortment, and more competitive pricing and promotional strategy to increase our market share.strategies by competitors and increased levels of marketing spending.
Our historical results have also been significantly influenced by our new store openings. Since the beginning of Fiscal 2014,2015, we have opened 13791 stores and as of December 31, 201630, 2017 operate 775785 stores located in 45 states, the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico. As partAt this point we have significantly slowed new store growth while we complete an evaluation of our reinvention strategy,store network strategy. In addition, we remain committed to innovation at the store level and we have reduced the numberbeen rolling out two key elements of planned new store openingscategory innovation with our new Kombucha bar on tap and Fit Freezer / Cooler section to over 80 stores in Fiscal 2017 as we assess the performance of recent remodeled stores.2017.
New stores have typically required approximately four to five years to mature, generating lower store level sales in the initial years than our mature stores. As a result, new stores generally have a negative impact on our overall operating margin. In addition, our new stores since the beginning of Fiscal 2013 are approximately 2,900 square feet compared to the average of our total store portfolio of approximately 3,500 square feet. Additionally, stores opened in new markets have lower brand awareness compared to stores in existing markets, and as a result initially experience a lower sales volume than stores opened in existing markets. As these stores mature, we expect them to contribute positively to our operating results.
Beginning in Fiscal 2016, the Company implemented enhancements to its loyalty program, including the issuance of credit certificates on a quarterly basis compared with the annual issuances under the previous program. Under the enhanced loyalty program, the related benefits are spread on a quarterly basis throughout the fiscal year. As a result, in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017, the related benefits of the quarterly program resulted in lower loyalty program related sales than the first quarter of Fiscal 2016 which were based on the annual cadence of the previous program.
In the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company entered into an agreement to lease a warehousing and distribution facility in Avondale, Arizona, which we expect to open beforeopened in the endthird quarter of Fiscal 2017. We expect to incurincurred approximately $16.0 million to $17.0 million of capital expenditures related to the opening of this facility. We previously utilized a third-party logistics provider to service the west coast. We believe operating our own facility will provide improved service levels and network efficiencies.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Critical accounting policies are those that are the most important portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations, and require our most difficult, subjective and complex judgments as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. While our significant accounting policies are described in more detail in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, our most critical accounting policies, discussed below, pertain to revenue recognition, inventories, impairment of long-lived assets, and goodwill and other intangible assets. In applying such policies, we must use some amounts that are based upon our informed judgments and best estimates. Estimates, by their nature, are based on judgments and available information. The estimates that we make are based upon historical factors, current circumstances and the experience and judgment of management. We evaluate our assumptions and estimates on an ongoing basis.
Revenue Recognition. We recognize revenue upon sale of our products when merchandise is sold “at point of sale” in retail stores or upon delivery to a direct customer. Wholesale revenue is recognized when risk of loss, title and insurable risks have transferred to the customer. All revenue is recognized net of sales returns. In addition, we classify amounts billed to customers that represent shipping fees as sales. To arrive at net sales, gross sales are reduced by deferred sales, customer discounts, actual customer returns, and a provision for estimated future customer returns, which is based on management’s review of historical and current customer returns. Sales taxes collected from customers are presented on a net basis and as such are excluded from revenue.
Table of Contents

InventoriesInventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method. As applied to inventories, cost means in principle the sum of the applicable expenditures and charges directly or indirectly incurred in bringing the product to its existing condition and location. Finished goods inventory includes costs on freight on internally transferred merchandise, and costs associated with our buying department, distribution facilities, and manufacturing overhead, which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold. In addition, the cost of inventory is reduced by purchase discounts and other allowances received from certain of our vendors. We adjust our inventory to reflect situations in which the cost of inventory is not expected to be recovered. We regularly review our inventory, including when a product is close to expiration and not expected to be sold, when a product has reached its expiration date, or when a product is not expected to be saleable. In determining the reserves for these products we consider factors such as the amount of inventory on hand and its remaining shelf life, and current and expected market conditions, including management forecasts and levels of competition. In addition, we have established a reserve for estimated inventory shrinkage between physical inventories. Physical inventories and cycle counts are taken on a regular basis, and inventory is adjusted accordingly. For each
Table of Contents

reporting period, we estimate inventory shrinkage based on a historical trend analysis. We have evaluated the current level of inventory considering historical trends and other factors, and based on our evaluation, have recorded adjustments to reflect inventory at net realizable value. These adjustments are estimates, which could vary significantly from actual results if future economic conditions, customer demand or competition differ from expectations. These estimates require us to make assessments about the future demand for our products in order to identify such inventory items as slow moving, expiring, obsolete or in excess of need. These future estimates are subject to the ongoing accuracy of management’s forecasts of market conditions, industry trends and competition. We are also subject to volatile changes in specific product demand as a result of unfavorable publicity, government regulation and rapid changes in demand for new and improved products or services. Inventory reserves were $8.6$6.5 million and $7.3$8.6 million at December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, respectively.
Long-Lived Assets. We evaluateThe Company reviews the carrying value of all long-lived assets including fixed assets and intangible assets with finite useful lives, periodically for impairment, primarily at an individual store level, whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amountvalue of any suchan asset may not be recoverable. IfThe frequency of these tests may change in future periods if performance warrants. Our impairment analyses determine whether projected cash flow from operations are sufficient to recover the sumcarrying value of ourthese assets. Impairment may result when the carrying value of the asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows over its remaining useful life. For store impairment, our estimate of undiscounted future cash flows over the store lease term is less thanbased upon our experience, the asset’shistorical operations of the stores and estimates of future store profitability and economic conditions. The estimates of future store profitability and economic conditions require estimating various factors including sales growth, gross margin, employment costs and inflation, and as a result are subject to variability. Actual future results may differ from those estimates. If a long-lived asset is found to be impaired, the amount recognized for impairment is equal to the difference between the asset's carrying value we recognizeand its fair value. Long-lived assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis using Level 3 inputs as defined in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows using a discount rate that approximates our weighted average cost of capital.
Significant assumptions used in these projections include an assessment of future store profitability, future overall economic conditions, our ability to control future costs and successfully implement initiatives designed to enhance sales and gross margins. To the extent that management's estimates of future performance are not realized, future assessments could result in material impairment loss, measured ascharges.
The Company is exploring strategic alternatives related to Nutri-Force, including the amount by whichpotential sale of this subsidiary. In the event suitable terms related to a potential divestiture of Nutri-Force are negotiated, Company management is required to obtain approval from its Board of Directors in order to move forward with a transaction.
As of December 30, 2017, in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, the Company prepared a probability-weighted undiscounted cash flow estimate considering the likelihood of the possible outcomes in order to assess the recoverability of the net assets of Nutri-Force. The results of this analysis demonstrated that the probability-weighted undiscounted cash flows associated with the possible outcomes exceeded the carrying value exceeds the fair value of the asset. These estimatesnet assets of Nutri-Force, which are classified as held and used until management obtains approval from its Board of Directors.
If a sale of Nutri-Force were to occur, the negotiated terms could result in a material change from the probability-weighted undiscounted cash flow require significant management judgment and certain assumptions about future sales and expense growth rates, devaluation and inflation. As such, these estimates may differ from actual cash flows. The Company recognized impairment charges of $0.8 million during Fiscal 2016 on fixed assets related to five of its underperforming retail locations still in useflows used in the Company's operations. The Companyrecoverability analysis, and could result in a loss being recognized impairment charges of $1.2 million during Fiscal 2015 on fixed assets related to five of its underperforming retail locations, three of which are still in use in the Company’s operations, and three retail locations in Ontario, Canada whichby the Company closed during Fiscal 2016. The Company recognized impairment charges of $0.4 million during Fiscal 2014 on fixed assets related to three of its underperforming retail locations, two of which are still in use in the Company’s operations. Impairment charges are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of income.for this transaction.
Goodwill and OtherIndefinite-lived Intangible Assets.Asset. The Company's one indefinite-lived intangible asset is the Vitamin Shoppe tradename. On an annual basis, or whenever impairment indicators exist, we perform an evaluation of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets.our tradename. In the absence of any impairment indicators, goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets areour tradename is tested in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year. With regards to goodwill,The evaluation of our evaluations are based on our three reporting units. The evaluations of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assetstradename may first consider qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit or indefinite-lived intangible assetthe tradename is less than its carrying value. A quantitative
Table of Contents

evaluation is performed if the qualitative evaluation results in a more likely than not determination or if a qualitative evaluation is not performed. Our quantitative evaluation for goodwill utilizesFor the discounted cash flow method, based on operating projections, as well as the market multiples method. For indefinite-lived tradenames,tradename, we utilize the royalty relief method in our quantitative evaluations. For those intangible assets which have definite lives, we amortize their cost
Based on the existence of an impairment indicator during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, namely the sustained decrease in our market capitalization, the Company performed an interim quantitative assessment of the fair value of the Vitamin Shoppe tradename based on the royalty relief method. The significant inputs to this valuation model were the Company’s revenue projections, the royalty rate and the discount rate. The revenue projections were based on the Company’s updated long-range plan and excluded the net sales attributable to the manufacturing reporting segment. The royalty rate was derived using a Company specific profit split analysis, as compared to royalty data from the market, given the recent circumstances regarding the Company's performance. The discount rate was based on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives,weighted average cost of capital calculation, which was adjusted for the periodsassociated risk.
Based on this analysis, the fair value of which vary basedthe Vitamin Shoppe tradename was $9.0 million as compared to the carrying value of $68.4 million. As a result, the Company recorded an impairment charge on their particular contractual terms.the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $59.4 million in the third quarter of Fiscal 2017.

Our annual and interim impairment review requiresreviews require extensive use of accounting judgment and financial estimates. Judgments regarding the existence of impairment indicators are based on market conditions and operational performance of the business. Future events could cause us to conclude that impairment indicators exist, and therefore that goodwill and other intangible assetsour tradename may be further impaired. The valuation of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assetsour tradename is affected by, among other things, our business plan for the future and estimated results of future operations. Changes in the business plan, operating results, or application of alternative assumptions that are different than the estimates used to develop the valuation of the assetsasset may materially impact theirthe valuation.
In Fiscal 2016, the Company performed a quantitative analysis of its retail and direct reporting units and determined that the fair value of these reporting units was greater that their respective carrying values. As a result, the Company believes the fair values of each of these reporting units and indefinite-lived tradenames substantially exceeds their respective carrying values.
Since the acquisition in Fiscal 2014, Nutri-Force, our manufacturing reporting unit, has experienced disruption in its ability to optimize production capacity, volatility in sales performance, loss of third party customers, and correspondingly has experienced lower service levels to customers. Based upon the operating results of Nutri-Force during the three months ended June 25, 2016, we concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the manufacturing reporting unit and therefore an impairment test was performed. A discounted cash flow model was prepared using the internal forecast, including an estimate of long-term future growth rates and a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in this forecast. The results of this analysis determined the fair value of the manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its carrying value, and as a result, we concluded the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit was not impaired. However, the fair value of the manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 5%, which was not considered to be a substantial excess over the carrying value. While financial results during the three months ended September 24, 2016 did not improve, we continued to closely monitor the financial performance of Nutri-Force. During the fiscal fourth quarter, the performance of
Table of Contents

Nutri-Force declined and expectations of future years were reduced significantly due to on-going churn in third party customers and its inability to reduce costs. In the fiscal fourth quarter, the Company performed valuation analyses, including our annual quantitative analysis of the manufacturing reporting unit as of October 22, 2016, based on the operating plan for Fiscal 2017 and then a subsequent updated long range projection due to further deterioration in operating results, which indicated that the carrying value of Nutri-Force exceeded its fair value. The Company proceeded to step two of the impairment analysis. Based on the results of these analyses, the Company recorded impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statement of income.
The Company has engaged outside consultants to perform an assessment of the operations of Nutri-Force to determine the actions and resources required to turnaround this business unit. As a result, the Company will likely incur expenses, charges and capital expenditures during Fiscal 2017 related to the turnaround of Nutri-Force.
General Definitions for Operating Results
Net Sales consist of sales, net of sales returns, deferred sales, customer incentives and a provision for estimated future returns. Total comparable net sales include retail sales generated by retailfulfilled in stores and e-commerce sales in both reporting periods.direct to consumer sales. Sales generated by retail stores after 410 days of operation and sales generated by acquired retail stores from the Super Supplements acquisition after 365 days are included in comparable net sales. Sales to third parties of manufactured products generated by Nutri-Force are considered non-comparable sales.
Cost of goods sold includes the cost of inventory sold, costs of warehousing, distribution, manufacturing and store occupancy costs and excludes depreciation and amortization related to the retail and direct segments that is included within selling, general and administrative expenses.costs. Warehousing, distribution and manufacturing costs, which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold, include freight to transfer merchandise, costs associated with our buying department, distribution facilities and manufacturing overhead. Store occupancy costs include rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes and utilities.
Gross profit is net sales minus cost of goods sold.
Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets, operating payroll and related benefits, advertising and promotion expense, depreciation and amortization expenses not capitalized in cost of goods sold, and other selling, general and administrative expenses.
Income (loss) from operations consists of gross profit minus selling, general and administrative expenses.
Interest expense, net includes interest on our Convertible Notes and Revolving Credit Facility, letters of credit fees, interest on our capital leases, as well as amortization of financing costs, reduced by interest income earned from highly liquid investments (investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less).
Table of Contents

Key Performance Indicators and Statistics
We use a number of key indicators of financial condition and operating results to evaluate the performance of our business, including the following (in thousands):
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
Net sales$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $1,213,046
$1,178,694
 $1,289,243
 $1,266,549
Increase (Decrease) in total comparable net sales (1)(0.9)%  % 3.7%
Decrease in total comparable net sales (1)(6.5)% (0.9)%  %
Increase (Decrease) in comparable store net sales(1.5)% 0.1 % 2.8%(6.9)% (1.5)% 0.1 %
Increase (Decrease) in e-commerce comparable net sales3.8 % (0.6)% 11.2%
Increase (Decrease) in VS.com comparable net sales (2)(12.3)% 7.3 % (6.5)%
Gross profit as a percent of net sales33.1 % 33.1 % 33.3%30.3 % 33.1 % 33.1 %
Income from operations$45,577
 $88,993
 $102,656
Income (loss) from operations$(262,813) $45,577
 $88,993
 
(1)Total comparable net sales are comprised of comparable fulfilled in retail store sales and e-commercedirect to consumer sales.
Table of Contents

(2)VS.com comparable net sales excludes sales from third party marketplaces.
The following table shows the growth in our network of stores for Fiscal 2017, 2016 2015 and 2014:2015:
Fiscal YearFiscal Year
2016 2015 20142017 2016 2015
Stores open at beginning of year758
 717
 659
775
 758
 717
Stores opened26
 50
 61
15
 26
 50
Stores closed(9) (9) (3)(5) (9) (9)
Stores open at end of year775
 758
 717
785
 775
 758

Results of Operations
The information presented below is for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 and was derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, which, in the opinion of management, includes all adjustments necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and operating results for such periods and as of such dates. The following table summarizes our results of operations for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 as a percentage of net sales:
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
Net sales100.0% 100.0% 100.0%100.0 % 100.0% 100.0%
Cost of goods sold66.9% 66.9% 66.7%69.7 % 66.9% 66.9%
Gross profit33.1% 33.1% 33.3%30.3 % 33.1% 33.1%
Selling, general and administrative expenses29.5% 26.0% 24.9%29.3 % 26.4% 26.0%
Income from operations3.5% 7.0% 8.5%
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-assets impairment charges23.3 % 3.1% 0.1%
Income (loss) from operations(22.3)% 3.5% 7.0%
Interest expense, net0.7% 0.1% %0.8 % 0.7% 0.1%
Income before provision for income taxes2.8% 6.9% 8.4%
Provision for income taxes0.9% 2.7% 3.4%
Net income1.9% 4.2% 5.0%
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(23.1)% 2.8% 6.9%
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(1.7)% 0.9% 2.7%
Net income (loss)(21.4)% 1.9% 4.2%
Figures may not sum due to rounding.
The results of operations presented for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017 and December 26, 2015 are each based on a 52-week period ("Fiscal 2017" and "Fiscal 2015"). The results of operations presented for the Fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 are based on a 53-week period ("Fiscal 2016"). The results of operations presented for the Fiscal years ended December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 are each based on a 52-week period ("Fiscal 2015" and "Fiscal 2014").
Fiscal 2016 Compared to Fiscal 2015
2016 Financial and Operating Highlights:
Net sales increased 1.8%
Total comparable net sales decreased 0.9%
Opened 26 retail stores
Transformed 4 stores into new reinvented stores
Launched new responsive website
Repurchased 2.6 million common shares for a total of $66.0 million
Impairment charges of $39.2 million on Nutri-Force goodwill and intangible asset
Fully diluted earnings per share of $1.04

Outlook for 2017, management expects:
Total comparable net sales growth of flat to low single digit negative
To open approximately 15 new stores
To remodel 10 to 15 stores into new format
Fully diluted earnings per share in the range of $1.95 to $2.20. This excludes any potential charges associated with the implementation of strategic initiatives to improve performance at Nutri-Force.
Capital expenditures of approximately $45 million
Table of Contents

Fiscal 2017 Compared to Fiscal 2016
The following tables summarize our results of operations for Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016 (in thousands):
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net sales$1,178,694
 $1,289,243
 $(110,549) (8.6)%
Cost of goods sold821,137
 862,887
 (41,750) (4.8)%
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales69.7 % 66.9%    
Gross profit357,557
 426,356
 (68,799) (16.1)%
Gross profit as % of net sales30.3 % 33.1%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses345,494
 340,752
 4,742
 1.4 %
SG&A expenses as % of net sales29.3 % 26.4%    
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-asset impairment charges274,876
 40,027
 234,849
 nm
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-asset impairment charges as % of net sales23.3 % 3.1%    
Income (loss) from operations(262,813) 45,577
 (308,390) nm
Income (loss) from operations as % of net sales(22.3)% 3.5%    
Interest expense, net9,701
 9,523
 178
 1.9 %
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(272,514) 36,054
 (308,568) nm
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(20,363) 11,090
 (31,453) nm
Net income (loss)$(252,151) $24,964
 $(277,115) nm

nm - not meaningful
Net Sales
The decrease in net sales was primarily due to the decrease in total comparable net sales of $78.8 million, or 6.5%, and the 53rd week sales of $20.2 million in Fiscal 2016. On a 52 week basis, the decrease in net sales was primarily the result of decreases in Sports Nutrition product categories of $48.6 million and Nutri-Force net merchandise sales to third parties of $17.2 million.
Net sales for our two business segments, as well as a discussion of the changes in each segment’s net sales from the comparable prior year period, are provided below (in thousands):
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016 *
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net Sales:       
Retail (a)$1,146,500
 $1,239,226
 $(92,726) (7.5)%
Manufacturing (b)81,607
 87,684
 (6,077) (6.9)%
Segment net sales1,228,107
 1,326,910
 (98,803) (7.4)%
Elimination of intersegment revenues(49,413) (37,667) (11,746) 31.2 %
Total net sales$1,178,694
 $1,289,243
 $(110,549) (8.6)%
* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(a)The change in retail sales resulted from a decrease in our total comparable net sales of $78.8 million, or 6.5% and the 53rd week sales of $19.6 million in Fiscal 2016 partially offset by an increase in our total non-comparable sales of $5.7 million. The decrease in total comparable net sales was primarily due to lower sales in the Sports Nutrition product categories.
(b)Manufacturing sales reflect a decrease in product manufactured for third parties of $17.8 million partially offset by an increase of $11.7 million in product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment. Manufacturing sales in the 53rd
Table of Contents

week of Fiscal 2016 were $1.2 million of which $0.6 million was product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment and $0.6 million was product manufactured for third parties.

Cost of Goods Sold
The dollar decrease of cost of goods sold was primarily due to the decrease in sales, including sales from the 53rd week of Fiscal 2016. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales increased 1.2% due to supply chain costs, 1.1% of deleverage of retail occupancy costs and 0.5% related to Nutri-Force. Cost of goods sold for Fiscal 2017 includes $7.2 million of restructuring costs related to the turnaround of Nutri-Force and $2.8 million for the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center and for Fiscal 2016 includes $0.4 million related to Super Supplements conversion costs and Canada stores closing costs.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
SG&A Expenses (in thousands):       
Store Payroll and Benefits (a)$137,941
 $135,722
 $2,219
 1.6 %
Store Payroll & benefit as % of net sales11.7% 10.5%    
Advertising and Promotion (b)27,283
 21,897
 5,386
 24.6 %
Advertising & promotion as % of net sales2.3% 1.7%    
Other SG&A (c)180,270
 183,133
 (2,863) (1.6)%
Other SG&A as % of net sales15.3% 14.2%    
Total SG&A Expenses$345,494
 $340,752
 $4,742
 1.4 %
(a)Store payroll and benefits increased primarily due to an increase in average wage rate and higher health insurance costs.
(b)Advertising and promotion expenses increased primarily due to higher retail expenditures focused on improving customer acquisition trends as a result of the competitive environment in our industry.
(c)Other selling, general and administrative expenses in Fiscal 2017 includes Nutri-Force turnaround costs of $5.1 million and costs related to the closing of our North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center of $0.3 million and Fiscal 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $3.8 million, costs related to the closing of the Canada stores of $2.1 million, Super Supplements conversion costs of $1.3 million and reinvention strategy costs of $0.5 million.

Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Store Fixed-Asset Impairment Charges

Fiscal 2017 includes impairment charges on the goodwill of the retail segment of $210.6 million, an impairment charge related to the Vitamin Shoppe tradename of $59.4 million and impairment charges on the fixed assets of retail stores of $4.8 million. Fiscal 2016 includes an impairment charge on the goodwill of the manufacturing segment of $32.6 million, an impairment charge on the customer relationships intangible asset of the manufacturing segment of $6.6 million and impairment charges on the fixed assets of retail stores of $0.8 million. For additional information, refer to Note 4., "Goodwill and Intangible Assets" to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Table of Contents

Income (Loss) from Operations
Operating income (loss) for our two business segments are provided below (in thousands):
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016 *
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$85,016
 $148,552
 $(63,536) (42.8)%
% of net sales7.4 % 12.0 %    
Manufacturing (b)(18,305) (44,223) 25,918
 (58.6)%
% of net sales(22.4)% (50.4)%    
Corporate costs (c)(329,524) (58,752) (270,772) nm
% of net sales(28.0)% (4.6)%    
Income (loss) from operations$(262,813) $45,577
 $(308,390) nm

* Prior period has been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.

nm - not meaningful
(a)The decrease in retail income from operations as a percentage of sales is primarily due to supply chain deleverage of 1.2%, occupancy deleverage of 1.1%, store payroll and benefits of 1.1%, advertising and promotion expenses of 0.7% and store impairment charges of 0.4%.
(b)The loss from operations of the manufacturing segment increased approximately $1.0 million after considering Fiscal 2017 includes Nutri-Force turnaround costs of $12.3 million and Fiscal 2016 includes impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force.
(c)Corporate costs in Fiscal 2017 includes goodwill impairment charges of $210.6 million and a tradename impairment charge of $59.4 million and corporate costs in Fiscal 2016 included outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $3.8 million and reinvention strategy costs of $0.5 million.
Interest Expense, Net
The increase in interest expense, net was primarily due to an increase in borrowing activity on the Revolving Credit Facility in Fiscal 2017 as compared to Fiscal 2016.

Provision (Benefit) for Income Taxes
The effective provision (benefit) tax rate for Fiscal 2017 was (7.5%), compared to 30.8% for Fiscal 2016. The change in the effective tax rate is primarily due to the non-deductible portion of the goodwill impairment charges and $15.3 million of tax expense resulting from the change in valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities under the Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017. The effective tax rate in Fiscal 2016 included a $3.0 million tax benefit resulting from the write-off of the Canada investment.

Table of Contents

Fiscal 2016 Compared To Fiscal 2015
The following tables summarize our results of operations for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 (in thousands):
Fiscal Years Ended    Fiscal Years Ended    
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net sales$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $22,694
 1.8 %$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $22,694
 1.8 %
Cost of goods sold862,887
 847,634
 15,253
 1.8 %862,887
 847,634
 15,253
 1.8 %
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales66.9% 66.9%    66.9% 66.9%    
Gross profit426,356
 418,915
 7,441
 1.8 %426,356
 418,915
 7,441
 1.8 %
Gross profit as % of net sales33.1% 33.1%    33.1% 33.1%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses380,779
 329,922
 50,857
 15.4 %340,752
 328,745
 12,007
 3.7 %
SG&A expenses as % of net sales29.5% 26.0%    26.4% 26.0%    
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-asset impairment charges40,027
 1,177
 38,850
 nm
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-asset
impairment charges as % of net sales
3.1% 0.1%    
Income from operations45,577
 88,993
 (43,416) (48.8)%45,577
 88,993
 (43,416) (48.8)%
Income from operations as % of net sales3.5% 7.0%    3.5% 7.0%    
Interest expense, net9,523
 1,105
 8,418
 761.8 %9,523
 1,105
 8,418
 nm
Income before provision for income taxes36,054
 87,888
 (51,834) (59.0)%36,054
 87,888
 (51,834) (59.0)%
Provision for income taxes11,090
 34,717
 (23,627) (68.1)%11,090
 34,717
 (23,627) (68.1)%
Net income$24,964
 $53,171
 $(28,207) (53.0)%$24,964
 $53,171
 $(28,207) (53.0)%
nm - not meaningful

Net Sales
The increase in net sales was primarily the result of our 53rd week sales of $20.2 million. On a 52 week basis, increases in specialty supplements product categories of $13.9 million and in vitamins, minerals, herbs and homeopathy product categories of $12.9 million were offset by decreases in sports nutrition product categories of $19.1 million and Nutri-Force net merchandise sales to third parties of $7.2 million.
Net sales for our threetwo business segments, as well as a discussion of the changes in each segment’s net sales from the comparable prior year period, are provided below (in thousands):
Fiscal Years Ended    Fiscal Years Ended    
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
December 31,
2016 *
 
December 26,
2015 *
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net Sales:              
Retail (a)$1,109,202
 $1,081,123
 $28,079
 2.6 %$1,239,226
 $1,209,948
 $29,278
 2.4 %
Direct (b)130,024
 128,825
 1,199
 0.9 %
Manufacturing (c)87,684
 91,159
 (3,475) (3.8)%
Manufacturing (b)87,684
 91,159
 (3,475) (3.8)%
Segment net sales1,326,910
 1,301,107
 25,803
 2.0 %1,326,910
 1,301,107
 25,803
 2.0 %
Elimination of intersegment revenues(37,667) (34,558) (3,109) 9.0 %(37,667) (34,558) (3,109) 9.0 %
Total net sales$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $22,694
 1.8 %$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $22,694
 1.8 %
 
* Prior periods have been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.
(a)The change in retail sales resulted from an increase in our total non-comparable storenet sales of $25.4$20.4 million and retail sales in the 53rd week of $18.2$19.6 million partially offset by a decrease in our total comparable storenet sales of $15.5$10.8 million, or 1.5%0.9%. The decrease in total comparable storenet sales was primarily driven by a decline in average transaction value and lower customer traffic.
(b)Direct sales increased primarily due to an increase in comparable e-commerce sales of $4.7 million, or 3.8%, and direct sales in the 53rd week of $1.4 million, offset by a decrease in non-comparable e-commerce sales and lower catalog sales totaling $5.0 million. The increase in comparable e-commerce sales was primarily due to effective customer acquisition and promotional activities. The decrease in non-comparable e-commerce sales was primarily due to the discontinuation of the Super Supplements website and catalog.
(c)Manufacturing sales reflect a decrease in product manufactured for third parties of $6.6 million partially offset by an increase of $3.1 million in product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment. Manufacturing sales in the 53rd week were $1.2 million of which $0.6 million was product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment and $0.6 million was product manufactured for third parties.

Table of Contents


Cost of Goods Sold
The dollar increase of cost of goods sold was primarily due to the increase in sales resulting from the 53rd week. Cost of goods sold as a percentage of net sales was flat. Improvement in product margin of 0.5% was offset by 0.3% related to Nutri-Force and 0.2% of deleverage of retail occupancy costs. Cost of goods sold for Fiscal 2016 includes $0.4 million related to Super Supplements conversion costs and Canada stores closing costs and for Fiscal 2015 includes a $1.3 million charge for the write-off of USPlabs® products which the Company ceased selling.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Fiscal Years Ended    Fiscal Years Ended    
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
SG&A Expenses (in thousands):              
Store Payroll and Benefits (a)$135,722
 $128,217
 $7,505
 5.9%$135,722
 $128,217
 $7,505
 5.9%
Store Payroll & benefit as % of net sales10.5% 10.1%    10.5% 10.1%    
Advertising and Promotion (b)21,897
 21,621
 276
 1.3%21,897
 21,621
 276
 1.3%
Advertising & promotion as % of net sales1.7% 1.7%    1.7% 1.7%    
Other SG&A (c)223,160
 180,084
 43,076
 23.9%183,133
 178,907
 4,226
 2.4%
Other SG&A as % of net sales17.3% 14.2%    14.2% 14.1%    
Total SG&A Expenses$380,779
 $329,922
 $50,857
 15.4%$340,752
 $328,745
 $12,007
 3.7%
 
(a)Store payroll and benefits increased primarily due to the increase in head count added to operate new stores and an increase in the average wage rates.
(b)Advertising and promotion as a percentage of net sales was flat. Higher retail expenditures and digital advertising was substantially offset by lower expenditures related to Nutri-Force.
(c)Other selling, general and administrative expenses increased primarily due to impairment chargesas a percentage of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force. Excluding these impairment charges, other selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $3.8 million.net sales were relatively flat.
Goodwill, Intangible Assets and Store Fixed-Asset Impairment Charges

Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-asset impairment charges increased primarily due to impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force.

Income from Operations
Operating income (loss) for our threetwo business segments are provided below (in thousands):
Fiscal Years Ended    Fiscal Years Ended    
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
December 31,
2016 *
 
December 26,
2015 *
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (Loss) from operations:       
Income (loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$197,450
 $192,598
 $4,852
 2.5 %$148,552
 $154,569
 $(6,017) (3.9)%
% of net sales17.8 % 17.8 %    12.0 % 12.8 %    
Direct (b)18,737
 20,904
 (2,167) (10.4)%
Manufacturing (b)(44,223) (1,977) (42,246) nm
% of net sales14.4 % 16.2 %    (50.4)% (2.2)%    
Manufacturing (c)(44,223) (1,977) (42,246) 2,136.9 %
% of net sales(50.4)% (2.2)%    
Corporate costs (d)(126,387) (122,532) (3,855) 3.1 %
Corporate costs (c)(58,752) (63,599) 4,847
 (7.6)%
% of net sales(9.8)% (9.7)%    (4.6)% (5.0)%    
Income from operations$45,577
 $88,993
 $(43,416) (48.8)%$45,577
 $88,993
 $(43,416) (48.8)%

* Prior periods have been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.

nm - not meaningful
 
Table of Contents

(a)Retail income from operations as a percentage of net sales was flat. A 0.8% improvement in product margin was offset bydecreased primarily due to 0.6% related to overhead costs, 0.4% from store payroll and benefits costs and 0.2% related to occupancy costs, and 0.2% from supply chain costs.partially offset by 0.5% improvement in product margin.
(b)The decrease in direct income from operations as a percentage of net sales is primarily due to a reduction in operating margin generated by on-line marketplaces and from an increase in promotional pricing and delivery expense.
(c)The year ended December 31, 2016 includes impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force. In addition, the manufacturing segment recognized an increase in costs as compared to the prior year due to operational inefficiencies. The year ended December 26, 2015 includes a $1.4 million charge for accounts receivable for one wholesale customer which were deemed uncollectible.
Table of Contents

costs as compared to the prior year due to operational inefficiencies. The year ended December 26, 2015 includes a $1.4 million charge for accounts receivable for one wholesale customer which were deemed uncollectible.
(d)(c)The increase in corporateyear ended December 31, 2016 includes outside consulting costs is primarily duerelating to costs incurreda project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities of $3.8 million and outside consultants fees in connection with the Company's reinvention includingstrategy of $0.5 million. The year ended December 26, 2015 includes management realignment charges of $3.4 million, outside consultants.consultants fees in connection with the Company's reinvention strategy of $2.7 million and integration costs related to the acquisition of Nutri-Force of $1.9 million, consisting primarily of professional fees.
Interest Expense, Net

The increase in interest expense, net was primarily due to the recognition of a full year of amortization of the debt discount and interest on the Convertible Notes in Fiscal 2016. The Convertible Notes were issued on December 9, 2015.

Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for Fiscal 2016 was 30.8%, compared to 39.5% for Fiscal 2015. The effective tax rate decreased primarily due to a $3.0 million tax benefit resulting from the write-off of the Canada investment.
Fiscal 2015 Compared To Fiscal 2014
The following tables summarize our results of operations for Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 (in thousands):
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net sales$1,266,549
 $1,213,046
 $53,503
 4.4 %
Cost of goods sold847,634
 808,787
 38,847
 4.8 %
Cost of goods sold as % of net sales66.9% 66.7%    
Gross profit418,915
 404,259
 14,656
 3.6 %
Gross profit as % of net sales33.1% 33.3%    
Selling, general and administrative expenses329,922
 301,603
 28,319
 9.4 %
SG&A expenses as % of net sales26.0% 24.9%    
Income from operations88,993
 102,656
 (13,663) (13.3)%
Income from operations as % of net sales7.0% 8.5%    
Interest expense, net1,105
 495
 610
 123.2 %
Income before provision for income taxes87,888
 102,161
 (14,273) (14.0)%
Provision for income taxes34,717
 40,920
 (6,203) (15.2)%
Net income$53,171
 $61,241
 $(8,070) (13.2)%

The results of Nutri-Force, included in the Company’s results of operations, reflect a full year for Fiscal 2015 and the period from June 6, 2014 through December 27, 2014 for Fiscal 2014.
Net Sales
The increase in net sales was the result of an increase in our total non-comparable net sales of $53.8 million, which includes an increase in Nutri-Force net sales of $16.3 million to third parties. Sales increased $24.0 million in the Other
product category (which includes on the go bars, drinks and snacks, as well as natural beauty and personal care products).
Sales in the Sports Nutrition category (which includes sports and performance nutrition and weight management products)
were relatively flat with the increase in sales of sports and performance nutrition products substantially offset by the decrease
in sales of weight management products. In addition, the growth rate in sales of sports and performance nutrition products is
below historical trends.
Table of Contents

Net sales for our three business segments, as well as a discussion of the changes in each segment’s net sales from the comparable prior year period, are provided below (in thousands):
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Net Sales:       
Retail (a)$1,081,123
 $1,042,054
 $39,069
 3.7 %
Direct (b)128,825
 130,644
 (1,819) (1.4)%
Manufacturing (c)91,159
 48,102
 43,057
 89.5 %
Segment net sales1,301,107
 1,220,800
 80,307
 6.6 %
Elimination of intersegment revenues(34,558) (7,754) (26,804) 345.7 %
Total net sales$1,266,549
 $1,213,046
 $53,503
 4.4 %
(a)The change in retail sales resulted from an increase in non-comparable store sales of $38.5 million and in comparable store sales of $0.6 million, or 0.1%. The increase in comparable store sales was driven by average transaction value substantially offset by a decrease in customer traffic.
(b)Direct sales declined due to a decrease in catalog sales of $1.0 million and a decrease in e-commerce sales of $0.8 million, or 0.6%.
(c)Manufacturing sales reflect an increase of $26.8 million in product manufactured for the Vitamin Shoppe assortment and an increase of $16.3 million in product manufactured for third parties.
Cost of Goods Sold
The dollar increase of cost of goods sold was primarily due to an increase in sales. The increase of cost of goods
sold as a percentage of net sales was primarily due to 0.5% of de-leverage of retail occupancy costs partially offset by 0.2%
related to Nutri-Force. Cost of goods sold for Fiscal 2015 includes a $1.3 million charge for the write-off of USPlabs® products which the Company ceased selling and for Fiscal 2014 includes a $4.5 million charge from adjusting Nutri-Force inventory to fair value as part of purchase accounting.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
SG&A Expenses (in thousands):       
Store Payroll and Benefits (a)$128,217
 $119,499
 $8,718
 7.3%
Store Payroll & benefit as % of net sales10.1% 9.9%    
Advertising and Promotion (b)21,621
 19,290
 2,331
 12.1%
Advertising & promotion as % of net sales1.7% 1.6%    
Other SG&A (c)180,084
 162,814
 17,270
 10.6%
Other SG&A as % of net sales14.2% 13.4%    
Total SG&A Expenses$329,922
 $301,603
 $28,319
 9.4%
(a)Store payroll and benefits increased primarily due to the increase in head count added to operate new stores and higher medical benefits costs.
(b)Advertising and promotion increased with the addition of Nutri-Force of $1.7 million and an increase in digital advertising of $0.8 million partially offset by lower retail expenditures of $0.2 million.
(c)Other SG&A expenses include an increase in costs related to Nutri-Force of $5.8 million and increased depreciation and amortization expenses of $4.0 million. In addition, other SG&A increased as a result of management realignment charges of $3.4 million, reinvention costs of $2.7 million, a charge to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts for Nutri-Force of $1.4 million and a net reduction in acquisition related costs of $2.9 million.

Table of Contents

Income from Operations
Operating income (loss) for our three business segments are provided below (in thousands):
 Fiscal Years Ended    
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
 
$
Change
 
%
Change
Income (Loss) from operations:       
Retail (a)$192,598
 $194,864
 $(2,266) (1.2)%
% of net sales17.8 % 18.7 %    
Direct (b)20,904
 22,755
 (1,851) (8.1)%
% of net sales16.2 % 17.4 %    
Manufacturing (c)(1,977) (1,830) (147) 8.0 %
% of net sales(2.2)% (3.8)%    
Corporate costs (d)(122,532) (113,133) (9,399) 8.3 %
% of net sales(9.7)% (9.3)%    
Income from operations$88,993
 $102,656
 $(13,663) (13.3)%
(a)Decrease in retail income from operations as a percentage of net sales is due to 0.5% related to occupancy costs and 0.4% from payroll and benefits costs.
(b)Decrease in direct income from operations as a percentage of net sales is due to 0.7% related to advertising and promotion expenses and 0.4% related to product margin.
(c)During the period ended December 26, 2015, the manufacturing segment recognized an increase in costs as compared to the prior year due to operational inefficiencies, and includes a $1.4 million charge for accounts receivable for one wholesale customer which were deemed uncollectible. The period ended December 27, 2014 includes a $4.5 million charge from adjusting Nutri-Force inventory to fair value as part of purchase accounting.
(d)The increase in corporate costs includes an increase in depreciation and amortization expenses of $4.0 million. In addition, corporate costs increased as a result of management realignment charges of $3.4 million, reinvention costs of $2.7 million and a net reduction in acquisition related costs of $2.9 million.
In addition to the items noted above, income from operations in Fiscal 2015 includes $1.8 million of Super Supplements conversion costs and $0.9 million of closing costs for the stores in Canada.
Provision for Income Taxes
The effective tax rate for Fiscal 2015 was 39.5%, compared to 40.1% for Fiscal 2014. The effective tax rate
decreased primarily due to a decrease in permanent non-deductible items during Fiscal 2015 as compared to Fiscal 2014.

Key Indicators of Liquidity and Capital Resources
The following table provides key indicators of our liquidity and capital resources (in thousands):
As of
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
Balance Sheet Data:      
Cash and cash equivalents$2,833
 $15,104
$1,985
 $2,833
Working capital (a)151,548
 157,089
155,231
 151,548
Total assets734,184
 748,691
488,753
 734,184
Total debt (b)133,371
 123,525
140,327
 133,371

(a) Working capital is total current assets minus total current liabilities.
(b) Total debt includes the outstanding balance on the Company's Revolving Credit Facility, the net balance of its Convertible Notes and its capital lease obligations.
Table of Contents

Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
 
December 27,
2014
December 30,
2017
 
December 31,
2016
 
December 26,
2015
Other Information:          
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets$38,780
 $38,495
 $34,219
$39,204
 $38,780
 $38,495
Cash Flows Provided By (Used In):          
Operating activities$93,373
 $60,667
 $100,147
$56,227
 $93,373
 $60,667
Investing activities(40,359) (39,430) (125,184)(55,448) (40,359) (39,430)
Financing activities(65,304) (18,428) (36,877)(1,662) (65,304) (18,428)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents19
 129
 44
35
 19
 129
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents$(12,271) $2,938
 $(61,870)$(848) $(12,271) $2,938
 

Liquidity and Capital Resources
OurHistorically, our primary uses of cash have been to fund working capital, operating expenses and capital expenditures related primarily to the build-out of new stores, the remodelingtransformation of existing stores and information technology investments as
Table of Contents

well as to repurchase shares of our common stock. Historically, weWe have financed our requirements predominately through internally generated cash flow, supplemented with short-term financing. In Fiscal 2015, we issued $143.8 million of Convertible Notes to fund the repurchase of shares of our common stock. Refer to Note 8.7., “Credit Arrangements”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. We believe that the cash generated by operations and cash and cash equivalents, together with the borrowing availability under our Revolving Credit Facility, will be sufficient to meet our working capital needs for the next twelve months, our store transformation growth plans, costs and investments related to our reinvention strategy,current initiatives, systems development, store improvements the opening of our new distribution center and interest payments on the Convertible Notes, as well as the repurchase of shares of our common stock and our Convertible Notes from time to time in negotiated or open market transactions subject to market conditions.
We purchased $66.0 million of common stock under our $300.0 million share repurchase programs during Fiscal 2016. Refer to Note 11., “Share Repurchase Programs”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information. We invested $40.1$55.0 million in capital expenditures during Fiscal 2016,2017, including costs for building new stores, remodeling existing stores, information technology and investments resulting from our reinvention strategy. During Fiscal 2017 we plan to spend approximately $45 million in capital expenditures, including costs for building new stores, remodelingtransforming existing stores, information technology, the opening of our new distribution center and investments resulting from our reinvention strategy.current initiatives. During Fiscal 2018 we plan to spend approximately $30.0 million in capital expenditures, including costs for information technology, remodeling of existing stores and the build-out of corporate offices. We opened 2615 new stores and closed 95 stores during Fiscal 2016.2017. We plan to open approximately 15two new stores in Fiscal 2017. Our working capital requirements for merchandise inventory will continue to increase as we continue to open additional stores. Currently, our practice is to establish an inventory level of approximately $145,000 at cost for each of our stores, the cost of which is partially offset by vendor incentive and allowance programs. Additionally, 30 day payment terms have been extended to us by some of our suppliers allowing us to effectively manage our inventory and working capital.2018.
The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents, and at times holds cash balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits. Currently, the Company’s cash management practice is to hold cash balances in quality institutions and invest in highly liquid and secure investments.
We were in compliance with all covenants relating to our Revolving Credit Facility and Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2016.30, 2017. We expect to be in compliance with these same covenants during Fiscal 20172018 as well.
Cash Provided by Operating Activities
Net cash provided by operating activities was $56.2 million and $93.4 million during Fiscal 2017 and Fiscal 2016, respectively. The $37.1 million decrease in net cash flows from operating activities is primarily due to the decrease in net income before impairment charges.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $93.4 million and $60.7 million during Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 respectively. The $32.7 million increase in net cash flows from operating activities is primarily due to the timing of accounts payable disbursements and an increase in inventory purchases in Fiscal 2015 related primarily to the transition of Vitamin Shoppe production of private brands to Nutri-Force and the opening of new stores.
Net cash provided by operating activities was $60.7 million and $100.1 million during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. The $39.5 million decrease in net cash flows from operating activities is primarily due to an increase in inventory purchases to support activities including the transition to a new third-party warehouse and the transition of products to our manufacturing facility.
Table of Contents

Cash Used in Investing Activities
Net cash used in investing activities was $55.4 million during Fiscal 2017 as compared to $40.4 million during Fiscal 2016. Capital expenditures during Fiscal 2017 were used primarily for the new distribution center, the transformation of existing stores and information technology investments. Capital expenditures during Fiscal 2016 were used primarily for the build-out of new stores, the remodeling of existing stores and information technology investments.
Net cash used in investing activities was $40.4 million during Fiscal 2016 as compared to $39.4 million during Fiscal 2015. Capital expenditures during Fiscal 2016 and 2015 were used primarily for the build-outbuildout of new stores, the remodeling of existing stores and information technology investments.
Cash Used in Financing Activities
Net cash used in investingfinancing activities was $39.4$1.7 million duringin Fiscal 20152017 as compared to $125.2$65.3 million duringin Fiscal 2014.2016. The $85.8$63.6 million decrease in cash used in investingfinancing activities is primarily due to a decrease in purchases of common stock under the $81.5 million for the acquisition of Nutri-Force in Fiscal 2014.
Cash Used in Financing ActivitiesCompany's share repurchase programs.
Net cash used in financing activities was $65.3 million in Fiscal 2016 as compared to $18.4 million in Fiscal 2015. The $46.9 million increase in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to purchases of common stock under the Company’s share repurchase programs of $66.0 million in Fiscal 2016 and $146.1 million in Fiscal 2015 partially offset by the net proceeds from the issuance of Convertible Notes of $125.7 million in Fiscal 2015.
Net cash used in financing activities was $18.4 million in Fiscal 2015 as compared to $36.9 million in Fiscal 2014. The $18.4 million decrease in cash used in financing activities was primarily due to purchases
Table of common stock under theContents
Company’s share repurchase programs of $146.1 million in Fiscal 2015 and $57.8 million in Fiscal 2014 partially offset by
the net proceeds from the issuance of Convertible Notes of $125.7 million in Fiscal 2015 and by net borrowings under the
Company’s Revolving Credit Facility of $8.0 million in Fiscal 2014. In addition, proceeds from exercises of stock options
decreased $8.0 million in Fiscal 2015 as compared to Fiscal 2014.

Revolving Credit Facility
The terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, which were amended on May 9, 2017, extend through October 11, 2018,May 9, 2022, and allow the Company to borrow up to $90.0 million, subject to the terms of the facility, with a Company option to increase the facility up to a total of $150.0 million. For information regarding the terms of our Revolving Credit Facility, refer to Note 8.7., “Credit Arrangements”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, the Company had $11.0$12.0 million of borrowings outstanding on its Revolving Credit Facility. The largest amount borrowed at any given pointoutstanding during Fiscal 20162017 was $27.0$38.0 million. The unused available line of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 201630, 2017 was $76.1$74.4 million.
Convertible Notes
On December 9, 2015, the Company issued $143.8 million of its 2.25% Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of VSI.the Company. Interest is payable on the Convertible Notes on June 1 and December 1 of each year commencing on June 1, 2016 until their maturity date of December 1, 2020. For additional information regarding the terms of our Convertible Notes, refer to Note 8.7., “Credit Arrangements”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, our lease commitments and contractual obligations were as follows (in thousands):
 
Fiscal year ending Total 
Operating
Leases
Real Estate (1)
 
Convertible
Notes
 
Interest on
Convertible
Notes
 
Operating
Leases
Equipment
 
Capital Lease
Obligations
2018 $128,238
 $124,086
 $
 $3,234
 $360
 $558
2019 114,221
 110,121
 
 3,234
 308
 558
2020 242,513
 94,710
 143,750
 3,234
 261
 558
2021 81,964
 81,384
 
   166
 414
2022 68,096
 68,014
 
 
 77
 5
Thereafter 162,108
 162,108
 
 
 
 
  $797,140
 $640,423
 $143,750
 $9,702
 $1,172
 $2,093
Fiscal year ending Total 
Operating
Leases
Real Estate (1)
 
Convertible
Notes
 
Interest on
Convertible
Notes
 
Operating
Leases
Equipment
 
Capital Lease
Obligations
2017 $126,087
 $122,219
 $
 $3,234
 $254
 $380
2018 116,261
 112,672
 ���
 3,234
 
 355
2019 97,475
 93,886
 
 3,234
 
 355
2020 225,403
 78,064
 143,750
 3,234
 
 355
2021 65,841
 65,630
 
 
 
 211
Thereafter 175,018
 175,018
 
 
 
 
  $806,085
 $647,489
 $143,750
 $12,936
 $254
 $1,656

(1)Store operating leases included in the above table do not include contingent rent based upon sales volume. Operating leases do not include common area maintenance costs or real estate taxes that are paid to the landlord during the year, which combined represented approximately 18.8%18.3% of our minimum lease obligations for Fiscal 2016.2017.
We are not party to any long-term purchase commitments. Our typical merchandise purchase orders are generally performed upon within a four to six week period. However, as of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, we have an obligation, excluded from the above commitments, of approximately $12.8$11.1 million to purchase an agreed upon supply of our own branded merchandise and raw materials during Fiscal 20172018 which has been produced by, and resides with, the applicable vendors.
In addition to the contractual obligations set forth in the table above, we have employment agreements with certain of our executives and an executive severance policy for all our officers that provide for compensation and certain other benefits. Under certain circumstances, these agreements and the policy provide for severance or other payments.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have not created, and are not party to, any special-purpose or off-balance sheet entities for the purpose of raising capital, incurring debt or operating our business. We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements or relationships with entities that are not consolidated into our financial statements that have or are reasonably likely to have a material current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources. The Company has commitments for its operating leases, primarily related to its stores, distribution centers, as well as its manufacturing and corporate facilities, which are not reflected on our balance sheet.
Effects of Inflation
We do not believe that our sales or operating results have been materially affected by inflation during the periods presented in our financial statements. During Fiscal 2016, retail price2017, cost inflation was less thanapproximately 1%. During Fiscal 2017,2018, we anticipate market driven cost inflation to be in the range of 0% to 2%. Additionally, we may experience increased cost pressure from our suppliers which could have an adverse effect on our gross profit results in the future.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Except as discussed in Note 2., “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”, to our consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, we have considered all new accounting pronouncements and have concluded that there are no new pronouncements that may have a material impact on our results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, based on current information.
Item 7A.    Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
The Company’s market risks relate primarily to changes in interest rates. Market risk represents the risk of changes in the value of market risk sensitive instruments caused by fluctuations in interest rates and commodity prices. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in the results of our operations and cash flows.
Our Revolving Credit Facility carries a floating interest rate and, therefore, our statements of incomeoperations and our cash flows are exposed to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, there was $11.0$12.0 million of borrowings outstanding on our Revolving Credit Facility. At December 31, 2016,30, 2017, a hypothetical 10% change in the floating interest rate would have a de minimis impact on our consolidated financial statements.
Our Convertible Notes carry a fixed interest rate and, therefore, have no market risk.
Item 8.        Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
The response to this item is incorporated herein by reference to the financial statements and supplementary financial data in Item 15. “Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules” appearing at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 9.        Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.

Item 9A.    Controls and Procedures
Conclusion Regarding the Effectiveness of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, who are our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, respectively, of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d—15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”) as of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-15 and 15d-15. Based on such evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2016.30, 2017.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
See Item 15. “Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules” appearing at the end of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting during the quarter ended December 31, 2016,30, 2017, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Inherent Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, do not expect that our disclosure controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will prevent or detect all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.

Controls can also be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation of controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
Item 9B.    Other Information
None.

PART III 
Item 10.        Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
Information with respect to this Item will be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in April 2017,2018, which is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “Proposal One – Election of Directors”, “Corporate Governance”, “Executive Officers” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance”.
Item 11.        Executive Compensation
Information with respect to this Item will be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in April 2017,2018, which is incorporated herein by reference under the captions, “Director Compensation”, “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Compensation”.
Item 12.        Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
Information with respect to this Item will be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in April 2017,2018, which is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “Security Ownership” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information”.
Item 13.        Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Information with respect to this Item will be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in April 2017,2018, which is incorporated herein by reference under the captions “Corporate Governance – Director Independence”, “Corporate Governance – Policies with Respect to Transactions with Related Persons” and “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions, and Director Independence”.
Item 14.        Principal Accounting Fees and Services
Information with respect to this Item will be included in the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed in April 2017,2018, which is incorporated herein by reference under the caption “Principal Accountant Fees and Services”.
PART IV
Item 15.        Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules

(a)The following documents are filed as part of this annual report on Form 10-K:

1.The following consolidated financial statements listed below are filed as a separate section of this annual report on Form 10-K:
Management’s Reports and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Deloitte & Touche LLP.
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the Fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the Fiscal years ended30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014.2015.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014.2015.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014.2015.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the Fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014.2015.





2.
Exhibits:
Exhibit
No.
  Description
  
2.1
  
  
2.2
  
  
2.3
  
  
3.1
  
  
3.2
  
  
4.1
  
  
4.2
  
  
10.1
  
  
10.2
  
  
10.3
  
  
10.4
  
  
10.5
  
  
10.6
  
  

10.7
  
  
10.8
  
  
10.9
  
   
10.10
  
  
10.11
  
  
10.12
  
  
10.13
  Fourth Amendment to Amended and Restated Loan and Security
  
10.14
 Intellectual Property
  
10.15
  
  
10.16
  
  
10.17
  
  


  
10.19
  
  
10.20
  
  
10.21
  
   
10.22

  
 
  
10.23
  
  
10.24
  
  
10.25
  
  
10.26
  
  
10.27
  
  
10.28
  
  
10.29
  
  
10.30
  
  


10.32
  
  
10.33
 2009 Vitamin Shoppe Equity Incentive Plan. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.27 in Amendment No. 2 to our Registration Statement No. 333-160756 on Form S-1 filed on September 22, 2009 (File No. 333-160756))
10.34
10.34
   
10.35
  
  
10.36
  
  
10.37
  
   
10.38
 
   
10.39
  
  
10.40
  Amendment No. 1 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, by and among Richard Markee, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.32 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2011 (File No. 001-34507))
10.41
Amendment No. 2 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012, by and among Richard Markee, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2012 (File No. 001-34507))
10.42
Employment Agreement, effective January 1, 2015, by and between Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. and Richard Markee. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 7, 2015 (File No. 001-34507))
10.43
Letter Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2015, among Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. and Richard Markee. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 4, 2016 (File No. 001-34507))
10.44
10.45
Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of June 12, 2006, by and among Anthony Truesdale, VS Parent, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (f/k/a VS Holdings, Inc.) and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 in Amendment No. 1 to our Registration Statement No. 333-134983 on Form S-4 filed on June 14, 2006 (File No. 333-134983-02))

10.46
Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of December 28, 2007, by and among Anthony Truesdale, VS Parent, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (f/k/a VS Holdings, Inc.) and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.36 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2008 (File No. 333-134983-02))
10.47
Amendment No. 2 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of September 25, 2009 by and among Anthony Truesdale, VS Parent, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (f/k/a VS Holdings, Inc.) and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on September 30, 2009 (File No. 333-134983-02))
10.48
Amendment No. 3 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of February 28, 2011, by and among Anthony Truesdale, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.31 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2011 (File No. 001-34507))
10.49
Amendment No. 4 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012, by and among Anthony Truesdale, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2012 (File No. 001-34507))
10.50
Letter Agreement, dated as of March 31, 2015, by and between Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Anthony Truesdale. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 7, 2015 (File No. 001-34507))
10.51
Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of January 15, 2007, by and among Louis H. Weiss, VS Parent, Inc., VS Direct, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (f/k/a VS Holdings, Inc.) and Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on January 16, 2007 (File No. 333-134983-02))
10.52
Amendment to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of December 28, 2007, by and among Louis H. Weiss, VS Parent, Inc., VS Direct, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (f/k/a VS Holdings, Inc.) and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 28, 2008 (File No. 333-134983-02))
10.53
Amendment No. 2 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012, by and among Louis H. Weiss, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2012 (File No. 001-34507))
  
10.5410.41
  Amendment No. 3 to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2015, by and among Louis H. Weiss, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2015 (File No. 001-34507))
10.55
Letter Agreement, dated as of January 29, 2016, among Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. and Louis H. Weiss (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.53 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on February 23, 2016 (File No. 001-34507))
10.56
Letter Agreement, dated as of February 10, 2011, by and between Brenda Galgano and Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.29 in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 9, 2011 (File No. 001-34507))
10.57
Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 29, 2012, by and among Brenda Galgano, Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on April 2, 2012 (File No. 001-34507))
10.58
Amendment to Employment and Non-Competition Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2015, by and among Vitamin Shoppe, Inc., Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. and Brenda Galgano. * (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on March 30, 2015 (File No. 001-34507))

10.59
Lease Agreement, dated as of May 2, 2002, by and between Hartz Mountain Industries, Inc. and Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 in our Registration Statement No. 333-134983 on Form S-4 filed on June 13, 2006 (File No. 333-134983-02))
  
10.6010.42
  
  
10.6110.43
 
   
10.6210.44
 Master Confirmation - Capped Accelerated Share Repurchase,
  
10.6310.45
  Master Confirmation - Capped Accelerated Share Repurchase, dated as of December 7, 2015, by and among Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and JP Morgan Securities LLC, as Agent for JPMorgan Chase Bank, National Association, London Branch. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed on December 10, 2015 (File No. 001-34507))
10.64
  

10.65
10.46
 
10.47
   
10.6610.48
 
   
10.6710.49
 
   
10.6810.50
 
   
10.6910.51
 
10.52
10.53
   
21.1
  
  
23.1
  
  
31.1
  
  
31.2
  
  
32.1
  
  
32.2
  
   

 
101
  
 
The following financial information from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016,30, 2017, formatted in eXtensible Business Reporting Language (XBRL): (a) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (b) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015; (b)(c) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2016, December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014; (c) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the fiscal years ended30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014;2015; (d) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014;2015; (e) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014;2015; and (f) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016, and December 26, 2015, and December 27, 2014.2015.

* Management contract or compensation plan or arrangement.

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 1, 2017.February 27, 2018.
 
VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC.
 
   
By: /s/ Colin Watts 
  
Colin Watts
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
 
   Name Title Date
    
By:  /s/ John BowlinAlexander W. Smith Non-ExecutiveExecutive Chairman, Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  John BowlinAlexander W. Smith  
    
By:  /s/ Colin Watts 
Chief Executive Officer, Director
(Principal Executive Officer)
 March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  Colin Watts  
    
By:  /s/ Brenda Galgano 
EVP, Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)
 March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  Brenda Galgano
By:/s/ Daniel Lamadrid
SVP, Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
March 1, 2017
Daniel Lamadrid  
    
By:  /s/ B. Michael Becker Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  B. Michael Becker  
    
By: /s/ Catherine BuggelnJohn D. Bowlin Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
 Catherine BuggelnJohn D. Bowlin  
    
By:  /s/ Deborah M. Derby Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  Deborah M. Derby
By:/s/ Tracy DolginDirectorFebruary 27, 2018
Tracy Dolgin  
    
By:  /s/ David H. Edwab Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  David H. Edwab  
    
By:  /s/ Richard L. MarkeeGuillermo G. Marmol Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  Richard L. MarkeeGuillermo G. Marmol  
    
By:  /s/ Guillermo MarmolBeth M. Pritchard Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  Guillermo MarmolBeth M. Pritchard  
    

By:  /s/ Beth M. PritchardDirectorMarch 1, 2017
Beth M. Pritchard
By:/s/ Timothy J. Theriault Director March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
  Timothy J. Theriault  

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of America (“GAAP”). Such internal control includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets; and (ii) provide reasonable assurance (A) that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures of the Company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors; and (B) regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016.30, 2017. In making this assessment, it used the criteria set forth in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) published in 2013. Based on this assessment, management has determined that, as of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.
The Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 201630, 2017 has been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their attestation report which appears herein.
March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
 
/s/ Colin Watts /s/ Brenda Galgano
Colin Watts Brenda Galgano
Chief Executive Officer EVP and Chief Financial Officer
MANAGEMENT’S RESPONSIBILITY FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
The management of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. is responsible for the preparation, objectivity and integrity of the consolidated financial statements and other information contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and include some amounts that are based on management’s informed judgments and best estimates.
Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has audited these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) and has expressed herein their unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, which oversees all of the Company’s financial reporting process on behalf of the Board of Directors, consists solely of independent directors, meets with the independent registered public accounting firm, internal auditors and management periodically to review their respective activities and the discharge of their respective responsibilities. Both the independent registered public accounting firm and the internal auditors have unrestricted access to the Audit Committee, with or without management, to discuss the scope and results of their audits and any recommendations regarding the system of internal controls.
March 1, 2017February 27, 2018
 
/s/ Colin Watts /s/ Brenda Galgano
Colin Watts Brenda Galgano
Chief Executive Officer EVP and Chief Financial Officer


REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.
Secaucus, New Jersey

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 30, 2017, of the Company and our report dated February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control overOver Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the supervision of, the company’s principal executive and principal financial officers, or persons performing similar functions, and effected by the company’s board of directors, management, and other personnel to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of theits inherent limitations, of internal control over financial reporting including the possibility of collusion or improper management override of controls, material misstatements due to error or fraud may not be preventedprevent or detected on a timely basis.detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of the effectiveness of the internal control over financial reporting to future periods are subject to the risk that the controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on the criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.
We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2016 of the Company and our report dated March 1, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 1, 2017February 27, 2018



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc.
Secaucus, New Jersey

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”"Company") as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 2015,31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income,operations, comprehensive income stockholders’(loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are30, 2017, and the responsibility ofrelated notes (collectively referred to as the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States)"financial statements"). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, such consolidatedthe financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 2015,31, 2016, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the three fiscal years in the period ended December 31, 2016,30, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Control - Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 1, 2017February 27, 2018 expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company’sCompany's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP
Parsippany, New Jersey
March 1, 2017February 27, 2018


We have served as the Company's auditor since 1997.


VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS      
Current assets:      
Cash and cash equivalents$2,833
 $15,104
$1,985
 $2,833
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $1,061 and $897 in 2016 and 2015, respectively7,367
 7,437
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $827 and $1,061
in 2017 and 2016, respectively
3,435
 7,367
Inventories241,736
 226,830
234,400
 241,736
Prepaid expenses and other current assets33,717
 25,194
39,634
 33,717
Total current assets285,653
 274,565
279,454
 285,653
Property and equipment, net139,132
 140,158
150,033
 139,132
Goodwill210,633
 243,269

 210,633
Other intangibles, net79,489
 87,270
19,417
 79,489
Deferred taxes37,278
 16,847
Other long-term assets19,277
 3,429
2,571
 2,430
Total assets$734,184
 $748,691
$488,753
 $734,184
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY      
Current liabilities:      
Revolving credit facility$11,000
 $8,000
$12,000
 $11,000
Accounts payable65,606
 41,217
46,945
 65,606
Deferred sales5,209
 20,483
5,710
 5,209
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities52,290
 47,776
59,568
 52,290
Total current liabilities134,105
 117,476
124,223
 134,105
Convertible notes, net120,874
 115,410
126,415
 120,874
Deferred rent37,489
 39,889
40,832
 37,489
Other long-term liabilities1,720
 615
1,916
 1,720
Commitments and contingencies
 

 
Stockholders’ equity:      
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized, 23,585,240 shares issued and 23,424,055 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016, and 25,993,715 shares issued and 25,873,581 shares outstanding at December 26, 2015236
 260
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 250,000,000 shares authorized and no shares issued and outstanding at December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 400,000,000 shares authorized, 24,220,509 shares issued and 24,021,948 shares outstanding at December 30, 2017, and 23,585,240 shares issued and 23,424,055 shares outstanding at December 31, 2016242
 236
Additional paid-in capital80,727
 139,827
88,823
 80,727
Treasury stock, at cost; 161,185 shares at December 31, 2016 and 120,134 shares at December 26, 2015(6,430) (5,225)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
 (60)
Treasury stock, at cost; 198,561 shares at December 30, 2017 and 161,185 shares at December 31, 2016(7,010) (6,430)
Retained earnings365,463
 340,499
113,312
 365,463
Total stockholders’ equity439,996
 475,301
195,367
 439,996
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$734,184
 $748,691
$488,753
 $734,184
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOMEOPERATIONS
(In thousands, except share and per share data)
 
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Net sales$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $1,213,046
$1,178,694
 $1,289,243
 $1,266,549
Cost of goods sold862,887
 847,634
 808,787
821,137
 862,887
 847,634
Gross profit426,356
 418,915
 404,259
357,557
 426,356
 418,915
Selling, general and administrative expenses380,779
 329,922
 301,603
345,494
 340,752
 328,745
Income from operations45,577
 88,993
 102,656
Goodwill, intangible assets and store fixed-assets impairment charges274,876
 40,027
 1,177
Income (loss) from operations(262,813) 45,577
 88,993
Interest expense, net9,523
 1,105
 495
9,701
 9,523
 1,105
Income before provision for income taxes36,054
 87,888
 102,161
Provision for income taxes11,090
 34,717
 40,920
Net income$24,964
 $53,171
 $61,241
Income (loss) before provision (benefit) for income taxes(272,514) 36,054
 87,888
Provision (benefit) for income taxes(20,363) 11,090
 34,717
Net income (loss)$(252,151) $24,964
 $53,171
Weighted average common shares outstanding          
Basic23,875,540
 28,954,804
 30,239,183
23,137,977
 23,875,540
 28,954,804
Diluted24,067,686
 29,203,429
 30,664,105
23,137,977
 24,067,686
 29,203,429
Net income per common share     
Net income (loss) per common share     
Basic$1.05
 $1.84
 $2.03
$(10.90) $1.05
 $1.84
Diluted$1.04
 $1.82
 $2.00
$(10.90) $1.04
 $1.82
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(In thousands)
 
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Net income$24,964
 $53,171
 $61,241
Net income (loss)$(252,151) $24,964
 $53,171
Other comprehensive income:          
Foreign currency translation adjustments60
 23
 3

 60
 23
Other comprehensive income60
 23
 3

 60
 23
Comprehensive income$25,024
 $53,194
 $61,244
Comprehensive income (loss)$(252,151) $25,024
 $53,194
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
 
Common Stock Treasury Stock 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
 Retained Earnings  Common Stock Treasury Stock 
Additional
Paid-In Capital
 
Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive (Loss) Income
 Retained Earnings  
Shares Amounts Shares Amounts TotalShares Amounts Shares Amounts Total
Balance at December 28, 201330,531,550
 $305
 (6,316) $(280) $302,314
 $(86) $226,087
 $528,340
Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 3
 61,241
 61,244
Equity compensation
 
 
 
 6,901
 
 
 6,901
Issuance of restricted shares194,929
 2
 
 
 (2) 
 
 
Purchases of treasury stock
 
 (51,140) (2,415) 
 
 
 (2,415)
Purchases of shares under Share Repurchase Programs(1,183,714) (12) 
 
 57,803
 
 
 (57,815)
Cancellation of restricted shares(14,691) 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan24,289
 
 
 
 923
 
 
 923
Exercises of stock options553,974
 6
 
 
 9,387
 
 
 9,393
Tax benefits on exercise of equity awards
 
 
 
 5,363
 
 
 5,363
Balance at December 27, 201430,106,337
 301
 (57,456) (2,695) 267,083
 (83) 287,328
 551,934
30,106,337
 $301
 (57,456) $(2,695) $267,083
 $(83) $287,328
 $551,934
Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 23
 53,171
 53,194

 
 
 
 
 23
 53,171
 53,194
Equity compensation
 
 
 
 5,402
 
 
 5,402

 
 
 
 5,402
 
 
 5,402
Issuance of restricted shares271,716
 3
 
 
 (3) 
 
 
271,716
 3
 
 
 (3) 
 
 
Issuance of shares5,184
 
 
 
 167
 
 
 167
5,184
 
 
 
 167
 
 
 167
Purchases of treasury stock
 
 (62,678) (2,530) 
 
 
 (2,530)
 
 (62,678) (2,530) 
 
 
 (2,530)
Purchases of shares under Share Repurchase Programs(4,328,055) (43) 
 
 (146,065) 
 
 (146,108)(4,328,055) (43) 
 
 (146,065) 
 
 (146,108)
Cancellation of restricted shares(145,117) (2) 
 
 2
 
 
 
(145,117) (2) 
 
 2
 
 
 
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan27,187
 
 
 
 892
 
 
 892
27,187
 
 
 
 892
 
 
 892
Exercises of stock options56,463
 1
 
 
 1,351
 
 
 1,352
56,463
 1
 
 
 1,351
 
 
 1,352
Equity portion of convertible notes, net
 
 
 
 24,948
 
 
 24,948

 
 
 
 24,948
 
 
 24,948
Bond hedge purchase
 
 
 
 (26,407) 
 
 (26,407)
 
 
 
 (26,407) 
 
 (26,407)
Warrant sale
 
 
 
 12,966
 
 
 12,966

 
 
 
 12,966
 
 
 12,966
Tax benefits on exercise of equity awards
 
 
 
 (509) 
 
 (509)
 
 
 
 (509) 
 
 (509)
Balance at December 26, 201525,993,715
 260
 (120,134) (5,225) 139,827
 (60) 340,499
 475,301
25,993,715
 260
 (120,134) (5,225) 139,827
 (60) 340,499
 475,301
Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 60
 24,964
 25,024
Equity compensation
 
 
 
 6,380
 
 
 6,380
Issuance of restricted shares196,777
 2
 
 
 (2) 
 
 
Issuance of shares11,942
 
 
 
 333
 
 
 333
Purchases of treasury stock
 
 (41,051) (1,205) 
 
 
 (1,205)
Purchases of shares under Share Repurchase Programs(2,552,556) (26) 
 
 (65,985) 
 
 (66,011)
Cancellation of restricted shares(103,362) (1) 
 
 1
 
 
 
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan33,442
 1
 
 
 822
 
 
 823
Exercises of stock options5,282
 
 
 
 90
 
 
 90
Tax benefits on exercise of equity awards
 
 
 
 (739) 
 
 (739)
Balance at December 31, 201623,585,240
 236
 (161,185) (6,430) 80,727
 
 365,463
 439,996
Comprehensive loss
 
 
 
 
 
 (252,151) (252,151)
Table of Contents

Comprehensive income
 
 
 
 
 60
 24,964
 25,024
Equity compensation
 
 
 
 6,380
 
 
 6,380

 
 
 
 6,122
 
 
 6,122
Issuance of restricted shares196,777
 2
 
 
 (2) 
 
 
607,161
 6
 
 
 (6) 
 
 
Issuance of shares11,942
 
 
 
 333
 
 
 333
Purchases of treasury stock
 
 (41,051) (1,205) 
 
 
 (1,205)
 
 (37,376) (580) 
 
 
 (580)
Purchases of shares under Share Repurchase Programs(2,552,556) (26) 
 
 (65,985) 
 
 (66,011)
Cancellation of restricted shares(103,362) (1) 
 
 1
 
 
 
(140,391) (2) 
 
 2
 
 
 
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan33,442
 1
 
 
 822
 
 
 823
68,499
 1
 
 
 468
 
 
 469
Exercises of stock options5,282
 
 
 
 90
 
 
 90
100,000
 1
 
 
 1,510
 
 
 1,511
Tax benefits on exercise of equity awards
 
 
 
 (739) 
 
 (739)
Balance at December 31, 201623,585,240
 $236
 (161,185) $(6,430) $80,727
 $
 $365,463
 $439,996
Balance at December 30, 201724,220,509
 $242
 (198,561) $(7,010) $88,823
 $
 $113,312
 $195,367
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
Table of Contents

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Cash flows from operating activities:      
Net income$24,964
 $53,171
 $61,241
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Net income (loss)$(252,151) $24,964
 $53,171
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization of fixed and intangible assets38,780
 38,495
 34,219
39,204
 38,780
 38,495
Impairment charge on goodwill32,636
 
 
Impairment charge on intangible asset6,594
 
 
Impairment charges on goodwill210,633
 32,636
 
Impairment charges on intangible assets59,405
 6,594
 
Impairment charges on fixed assets797
 1,177
 419
6,658
 797
 1,177
Contingent consideration for acquisition of FDC Vitamins, LLC
 (959) 959

 
 (959)
Amortization of deferred financing fees957
 237
 164
898
 957
 237
Amortization of debt discount on convertible notes4,690
 223
 
4,781
 4,690
 223
Deferred income taxes(13,683) (1,364) (3,950)(19,834) (13,683) (1,364)
Deferred rent(3,226) (2,294) (503)(2,431) (3,226) (2,294)
Equity compensation expense6,292
 5,491
 6,901
6,122
 6,292
 5,491
Issuance of shares for services rendered333
 167
 

 333
 167
Tax benefits on exercises of equity awards739
 509
 (5,363)1,017
 739
 509
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:      
Accounts receivable70
 2,939
 1,499
3,932
 70
 2,939
Inventories(13,078) (38,284) (2,458)10,460
 (13,078) (38,284)
Prepaid expenses and other current assets(8,521) 3,889
 3,782
(5,916) (8,521) 3,889
Other long-term assets116
 (139) 2,441
(598) 116
 (139)
Accounts payable26,522
 (3,709) (9,869)(15,595) 26,522
 (3,709)
Deferred sales(15,277) (2,011) 787
501
 (15,277) (2,011)
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities2,921
 394
 8,483
7,047
 2,921
 394
Other long-term liabilities747
 2,735
 1,395
2,094
 747
 2,735
Net cash provided by operating activities93,373
 60,667
 100,147
56,227
 93,373
 60,667
Cash flows from investing activities:      
Capital expenditures(40,068) (39,403) (42,957)(55,020) (40,068) (39,403)
Acquisition of FDC Vitamins, LLC
 487
 (81,538)
 
 487
Trademarks and other intangible assets(291) (514) (689)(428) (291) (514)
Net cash used in investing activities(40,359) (39,430) (125,184)(55,448) (40,359) (39,430)
Cash flows from financing activities:      
Borrowings under revolving credit agreement82,000
 47,000
 15,000
Repayments of borrowings under revolving credit agreement(79,000) (47,000) (7,000)
Borrowings under revolving credit facility118,000
 82,000
 47,000
Repayments of borrowings under revolving credit facility(117,000) (79,000) (47,000)
Proceeds from issuance of convertible notes
 143,750
 

 
 143,750
Debt issuance costs on convertible notes(2) (4,593) 

 (2) (4,593)
Bond hedge purchase
 (26,407) 

 
 (26,407)
Proceeds from sale of warrants
 12,966
 

 
 12,966
Contingent consideration payment for acquisition of FDC Vitamins, LLC
 (4,041) 

 
 (4,041)
Bank overdraft(1,041) 6,973
 
(3,265) (1,041) 6,973
Table of Contents

Payments of capital lease obligations(207) (80) (152)(451) (207) (80)
Proceeds from exercises of common stock options90
 1,352
 9,393
1,511
 90
 1,352
Issuance of shares under employee stock purchase plan823
 892
 923
469
 823
 892
Purchases of treasury stock(1,205) (2,530) (2,415)(580) (1,205) (2,530)
Purchases of shares under Share Repurchase Programs(66,011) (146,108) (57,815)
 (66,011) (146,108)
Tax benefits on exercises of equity awards(739) (509) 5,363

 (739) (509)
Deferred financing fees and other(12) (93) (174)(346) (12) (93)
Net cash used in financing activities(65,304) (18,428) (36,877)(1,662) (65,304) (18,428)
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents19
 129
 44
35
 19
 129
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents(12,271) 2,938
 (61,870)(848) (12,271) 2,938
Cash and cash equivalents beginning of year15,104
 12,166
 74,036
2,833
 15,104
 12,166
Cash and cash equivalents end of year$2,833
 $15,104
 $12,166
$1,985
 $2,833
 $15,104
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:      
Interest paid$3,715
 $440
 $249
$3,953
 $3,715
 $440
Income taxes paid$33,655
 $33,659
 $37,652
$6,610
 $33,655
 $33,659
Supplemental disclosures of non-cash investing activities:      
Liability for purchases of property and equipment$4,630
 $7,497
 $8,379
$4,457
 $4,630
 $7,497
Assets acquired under capital lease$1,589
 $
 $
Assets acquired under capital leases$891
 $1,589
 $
Assets acquired under tenant incentives$2,986
 $
 $
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

VITAMIN SHOPPE, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Presentation
Vitamin Shoppe, Inc. (“VSI”), is incorporated in the State of Delaware, and through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Vitamin Shoppe Industries Inc. (“Subsidiary” or “Industries” together with VSI, the “Company”), is a multi-channelan omni-channel specialty retailer and contract manufacturer of nutritional products. Sales of both national brands and our own brands of vitamins, minerals, herbs, specialty supplements, sports nutrition and other health and wellness products (“VMS products”) are made through VSI-operated retail stores and the internet to customers located primarily in the United States. The Company manufactures products for boththe VSI product assortment as well as sales to third parties as well as for the VSI product assortment.parties.
The consolidated financial statements for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 include the accounts of VSI and Subsidiary. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
The Company’s fiscal year ends on the last Saturday in December. As used herein, the term “Fiscal Year” or “Fiscal” refers to a 52-week or 53-week period, ending on the last Saturday in December. Fiscal 2016 iswas a 53-week fiscal year.
On June 6, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of FDC Vitamins, LLC d/b/a Nutri-Force Nutrition (“Nutri-Force”), a company which provides custom manufacturing and private labeling of vitamins, dietary supplements, nutraceuticals and nutritional supplements, as well as, develops and markets its own branded products. The total purchase price was $86.1 million in cash. Refer to Note 3. Acquisitions for additional information.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents—Cash and cash equivalents include all highly liquid investments with original maturities of ninety days or less. The Company reclassifies cash overdrafts to accounts payable.
Accounts Receivable—Through FDC Vitamins, LLC d/b/a Nutri-Force Nutrition (“Nutri-Force”), a subsidiary of Industries, the Company sells product to third-party wholesale customers. The Company monitors the financial condition of its third-party wholesale customers and establishes an allowance for doubtful accounts for balances estimated to be uncollectible. In addition, customer allowances including promotional discounts and allowances are provided to wholesale customers based on various contract terms and are recorded as a reduction to revenue.
The following table details the activity and balances for the Company’s customer allowances for the years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 (in thousands):
Balance at
Beginning
of Fiscal
Year
 Additions Deductions 
Balance at
End of
Fiscal Year
Balance at
Beginning
of Fiscal
Year
 Additions Deductions 
Balance at
End of
Fiscal Year
Period Ended December 30, 2017$1,061
 $2,919
 $(3,153) $827
Period Ended December 31, 2016$897
 $3,097
 $(2,933) $1,061
$897
 $3,097
 $(2,933) $1,061
Period Ended December 26, 2015$1,883
 $2,752
 $(3,738) $897
$1,883
 $2,752
 $(3,738) $897
Period Ended December 27, 2014$
 $3,194
 $(1,311) $1,883
Inventories—Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market value. Cost is determined using the weighted average method. Finished goods inventory includes costs of freight on internally transferred merchandise, and costs associated with our buying department and distribution facilities, as well as manufacturing overhead which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold. In addition, the cost of inventory is reduced by purchase discounts and other allowances received from certain of our vendors. The Company estimates losses for expiring inventory and the net realizable value of inventory based on when a product is close to expiration and not expected to be sold, when a product has reached its expiration date, or when a product is not expected to be saleable. In determining the reserves for these products, consideration is given to such factors as the amount of inventory on hand, the remaining shelf life, current and expected market conditions, historical trends and the likelihood of recovering the inventory costs based on anticipated demand. The following table details the activity and balances for the Company’s reserve for inventory for the years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 (in thousands):
Table of Contents

 
Balance at
Beginning
of Fiscal
Year
 
Amounts
Charged to
Cost of
Goods Sold
 
Write-Offs
Against
Reserves
 
Balance at
End of
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016$7,253
 $11,067
 $(9,707) $8,613
Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015 (1)$5,797
 $11,088
 $(9,632) $7,253
Fiscal Year Ended December 27, 2014 (1)$2,640
 $8,764
 $(5,607) $5,797
(1) Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 figures have been restated to include the reserve for inventory of Nutri-Force.
 
Balance at
Beginning
of Fiscal
Year
 
Amounts
Charged to
Cost of
Goods Sold
 
Write-Offs
Against
Reserves
 
Balance at
End of
Fiscal Year
Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2017$8,613
 $23,092
 $(25,169) $6,536
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016$7,253
 $11,067
 $(9,707) $8,613
Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015$5,797
 $11,088
 $(9,632) $7,253
Property and Equipment, Net—Property and equipment, net is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation and amortization are provided for on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Furniture, fixtures and equipment are generally depreciated over seven years. Leasehold improvements are amortized generally over the shorter of their useful lives or related lease terms. The direct internal and external costs associated with the development of the features and functionality of the Company’s website, transaction processing systems, telecommunications infrastructure and network operations, are capitalized and are amortized on a straight line basis over the estimated useful lives of generally five years. Capitalization of costs begins when the preliminary project stage is completed and management authorizes and commits to funding the computer software project and that it is probable that the project will be completed and the software will be used to perform the function intended. Depreciation of the assets commences when they are put into use. Expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred and expenditures for major renovations and improvements are capitalized. Upon retirement or disposition of property and equipment, the applicable cost and accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any resulting gains or losses are included in the results of operations.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets—The Company reviews its long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances, including store closures, indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of an asset to undiscounted pre-tax future net cash flows expected to be generated by that asset. If the undiscounted future cash flows are not adequate to recover the carrying value of the asset, an impairment loss is recognized for the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
Goodwill and Other Intangibles—Goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles are not amortized. Evaluations for impairment are performed at least annually, in the fourth quarter of each year, or whenever impairment indicators exist. Goodwill is evaluated for impairment at the reporting unit level (the Company’s operating segments). The evaluation of goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles may first consider qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value. A quantitative evaluation is performed if the qualitative evaluation results in a more likely than not determination or if a qualitative evaluation is not performed. The Company’s quantitative impairment tests involve calculating the fair value of each reporting unit using the discounted cash flow analysis method along with the market multiples method which is used for additional validation of the fair value calculated. These valuation methods require certain assumptions and estimates be made by the Company regarding certain industry trends and future profitability. It is the Company’s policy to conduct goodwill impairment testing from information based on current business projections, which include projected future revenues and cash flows. The cash flows utilized in the discounted cash flow analysis are based on five-year financial forecasts developed internally by management. Cash flows for each reporting unit are discounted using an internally derived weighted average cost of capital which reflects the costs of borrowing for the funding of each unit as well as the risk associated with the units themselves. IfIn January 2017, the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceedsFASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2017-04 (“ASU 2017-04”), Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (Topic 350). Under ASU 2017-04, an entity should perform its fair value, the Company would compare the implied fair value of the reporting unitannual, or interim, goodwill with its carrying value. To compute the implied fair value of goodwill, the Company would assignimpairment test by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount and should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which that carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit's fair value. The loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to allthat reporting unit. Additionally, an entity should consider income tax effects from any tax deductible goodwill on the carrying amount of the assets and liabilities of that unit (including any unrecognized intangible assets) as if the reporting unit had been acquired in a business combination.when measuring the goodwill impairment loss, if applicable. The excess of the fair value of a reporting unit over the amounts assignedCompany elected to its assetsearly adopt this guidance for interim and liabilities is the implied fair value of goodwill. Also as part of the quantitative test, the Company conducts the test using a 10% decrease in its revenue projections as an additional sensitivity test to ensure the reporting unit’s fair value is greater than its carrying value should events in the future be less favorable than anticipated.annual goodwill impairment tests performed on testing dates after January 1, 2017. For indefinite-lived tradenames, we utilize the royalty relief method in our quantitative evaluations. Under the royalty relief method, a royalty rate is determined based on comparable licensing arrangements which is applied to the revenue projections for the applicable indefinite-lived tradename and the fair value is calculated using a discounted cash flow analysis. ToCash flows are discounted using an internally derived weighted average cost of capital which reflects the extent thatcosts of borrowing as well as the implied fair value associated with the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is less than the recorded value, this would result in a write down of the carrying value of the asset.risk. Impairment tests between annual tests may be
Table of Contents

undertaken if an event occurs or circumstances change that could reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. The valuation of the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets is affected by, among other things, the Company’s projections for the future and estimated results of future operations. Changes in the business plan or operating results that are different than the estimates used to develop the valuation of the assets may impact these valuations. For those
Table of Contents

intangible assets which have definite lives, the Company amortizes their cost on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives, the periods of which vary based on their particular contractual terms.
InDuring Fiscal 2016,2017, the Company performed a quantitative analysisanalyses of its retail and direct reporting unitsunit and determined that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value, resulting in an impairment of these reporting units was greater that their respective carrying values. As a result, the Company believescorresponding goodwill of $210.6 million and an impairment charge on the fair valuesVitamin Shoppe tradename of each of these reporting units$59.4 million. Refer to Note 4. Goodwill and indefinite-lived tradenames substantially exceeds their respective carrying values.Intangible Assets for additional information.
During Fiscal 2016, the Company also performed quantitative analyses of its manufacturing reporting unit and determined the carrying value of the manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its fair value, which resulted in the write-off of the corresponding goodwill of $32.6 million and the customer relationship intangible asset of $6.6 million. Refer to Note 5.4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information.
There have been no impairment charges related to goodwill or other intangibles during Fiscal 2015, and Fiscal 2014.or in prior years.
Rent Expenses, Deferred Rent and Landlord Construction Allowances—Rent expense and rent incentives, including landlord construction allowances, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The Company records rent expense for stores, distribution centers and manufacturing facilities as a component of cost of goods sold. The Company accounts for landlord construction allowances as lease incentives and records them as a component of deferred rent, which is recognized in cost of goods sold over the lease term.
Revenue Recognition—The Company recognizes revenue when merchandise is sold “at point of sale” in retail stores or upon delivery to a direct customer. In addition, shipping fees billed to customers are classified as sales. Amount recognized as shipping revenue during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, and Fiscal 2014, were $2.2 million, $2.0$2.2 million and $3.0$2.0 million respectively. Nutri-Force sells product primarily to third-party customersour retail segment and to our retail and direct segments.third-party customers. Wholesale revenue is recognized when risk of loss, title and insurable risks have transferred to the customer, net of estimated returns and allowances. To arrive at net sales, gross sales are reduced by deferred sales, customer discounts, actual customer returns and a provision for estimated future customer returns, which is based on management’s review of historical and current customer returns. Sales taxes collected from customers are presented on a net basis and as such are excluded from revenue.
Cost of Goods Sold—The Company includes the cost of inventory sold, costs of warehousing, distribution, manufacturing and store occupancy costs in cost of goods sold and excludes depreciation and amortization related to the retail and direct segments, which is included within selling, general and administrative expenses.costs. Warehousing, distribution and manufacturing costs, which are capitalized into inventory and then expensed as merchandise is sold, include freight on internally transferredto transfer merchandise, as well as for shipments to direct and wholesale customers and costs associated with our buying department, and distribution facilities as well asand manufacturing overhead. Store occupancy costs include rent, common area maintenance, real estate taxes and utilities.
Vendor Allowances—Vendor allowances include discounts, allowances and rebates received from vendors and are based on various contract terms. Vendor allowances are recognized as either purchase discounts which represent a reduction of product cost, funding which is capitalized into inventory and recognized in the statement of incomeoperations as the merchandise is sold, or direct offset which represents funding subject to immediate recognition in the statement of income,operations, depending on the nature of the allowance.
Frequent Buyer Program—The Company has a frequent buyer program (“Healthy Awards Program”), whereby customers earn points toward free merchandise based on the dollar volume of purchases. Beginning in Fiscal 2016, points are earned each calendar quarter and must be redeemed within the subsequent calendar quarter or they expire. In previous years, points were earned each calendar year and must be redeemed within the first three months of the following year or they expire. Sales are deferred at the time points are earned based on the value of points that are projected to be redeemed, which are based on historical redemption data. The Company records a liability in the period points are earned with a corresponding reduction of sales.
Store Pre-opening Costs—Costs associated with the opening of new retail stores and start up activities are expensed as incurred.
Table of Contents

Advertising Costs—The costs of advertising for online marketing arrangements, magazines, direct mail and radio are expensed as incurred, or the first time the advertising takes place. Advertising expense was $27.3 million, $21.9 million $21.6 million and $19.3$21.6 million for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015, and Fiscal 2014, respectively.
Online Marketing Arrangements—The Company has entered into online marketing arrangements with various online companies. These agreements are established for periods of 24 months, 12 months or, in some cases, a lesser period and generally provide for compensation based on revenue sharing upon the attainment of stipulated revenue amounts, a percentage
Table of Contents

of the media expenditure managed by the online partner, or based on the number of visitors that the online company refers to the Company. The Company had no fixed payment commitments during Fiscal 2016,2017, Fiscal 20152016 and Fiscal 2014.2015.
Income Taxes—Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recorded in accordance with the liability method. Deferred income taxes have been provided for temporary differences between the tax bases and financial reporting bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect for the periods in which the differences are expected to reverse.
The Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 was enacted on December 22, 2017, reducing the statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As required, the Company determined a reasonable estimate for certain effects of tax reform and recorded that estimate as a provisional amount. Refer to Note 8. Income Taxes for additional information.
The Company accounts for tax positions based on the provisions of the accounting literature related to accounting for uncertainty in income tax positions. Such literature provides guidance for the recognition threshold and measurement attribute for financial statement recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. For tax positions that are not more likely than not sustainable upon audit, the Company recognizes the largest amount of the benefit that is more likely than not to be sustained. The Company makes estimates of the potential liability based on our assessment of all potential tax exposures. In addition, the Company uses factors such as applicable tax laws and regulations, current information and past experience with similar issues to make these assessments. The tax positions are analyzed regularly and adjustments are made as events occur that warrant adjustments for those positions. These tax positions were not significant for Fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015. The Company records interest expense and penalties payable to relevant tax authorities as income tax expense.
Concentrations of Credit Risk—Financial instruments, which potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk, include accounts receivable from wholesale customers as well as debit and credit card processors of retail transactions. As of December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015, five customers represented approximately 58% and 53%, respectively, of thetransactions as well as accounts receivable from wholesale customers. Accounts receivable from debit and credit card processors, included in prepaid expenses and other current assets on the consolidated balance sheets, totaled $10.7 million at December 30, 2017 and $10.6 million at December 31, 2016. As of December 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, five customers represented approximately 67% and $10.2 million at December 26, 2015.58%, respectively, of the accounts receivable from wholesale customers.
The Company had one supplier from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2016, two suppliers from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2017 and 2015, and one supplier from whom we purchased at least 5% of our merchandise during Fiscal 2014.2016. We purchased approximately 11%15% of our total merchandise from these suppliers during Fiscal 2017, approximately 11% during Fiscal 2016 and approximately 17% during Fiscal 2015 and 12% during Fiscal 2014.2015.
The Company is subject to concentrations of credit risk associated with cash and cash equivalents, and at times holds cash balances in excess of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation limits.
Stock-Based Compensation—Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of awards and is recognized as expense on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period for each separately vesting portion of the award, net of anticipated forfeitures. With the exception of restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units, determining the fair value of stock-based awards at the grant date requires considerable judgment, including estimating expected volatility, expected term and risk-free rate. Compensation expense resulting from the granting of restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units is based on the grant date fair value of those common shares and is recognized generally over the two to three year vesting period for restricted shares, the approximately three year vesting period for performance share units and over the quarterly or one year vesting periods for restricted share units. For accounting purposes, the expense for performance based stock options, performance based restricted shares and performance share units is calculated and recorded, based on the determination that the achievement of the pre-established performance targets are probable, over the relevant service period. The vesting requirements for performance based stock options and performance based restricted shares permit a catch-up of vesting at the end of the vesting period.
Expense related to shares purchased under the Company’s Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”) is accounted for based on fair value recognition requirements similar to stock options. ESPP participation occurs each calendar quarter (the “Participation Period”) and the expense of which is subject to employee participation in the plan. Under the ESPP, participating employees are allowed to purchase shares at 85% of the lower of the market price of the Company’s common stock at either the first or last trading day of the Participation Period. Compensation expense related to the ESPP is based on the estimated fair value of the discount and purchase price offered on the estimated shares to be purchased under the ESPP. Expense is calculated quarterly, based on the employee contributions made over the applicable three-month Participation Period, using volatility and risk free rates applicable to that three-month period.
Table of Contents

Net Income (Loss) Per Share—The Company’s basic net income (loss) per share excludes the dilutive effect of stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested performance share units and unvested restricted share units. It is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period divided into net income.income (loss).
Diluted net income (loss) per share reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock. Stock options, unvested restricted shares, unvested performance share units, warrants and unvested restricted share units are included as potential dilutive securities for the periods applicable, using the treasury stock method to the extent dilutive.
The components of the calculation of basic net income (loss) per common share and diluted net income (loss) per common share are as follows (in thousands except share and per share data):
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Numerator:          
Net income$24,964
 $53,171
 $61,241
Net income (loss)$(252,151) $24,964
 $53,171
Denominator:          
Basic weighted average common shares outstanding23,875,540
 28,954,804
 30,239,183
23,137,977
 23,875,540
 28,954,804
Effect of dilutive securities:     
Effect of dilutive securities (a):     
Stock options68,272
 97,114
 235,057

 68,272
 97,114
Restricted shares115,287
 150,353
 184,995

 115,287
 150,353
Performance share units7,173
 
 

 7,173
 
Restricted share units1,414
 1,158
 4,870

 1,414
 1,158
Diluted weighted average common shares outstanding24,067,686
 29,203,429
 30,664,105
23,137,977
 24,067,686
 29,203,429
Basic net income per common share$1.05
 $1.84
 $2.03
Diluted net income per common share$1.04
 $1.82
 $2.00
Basic net income (loss) per common share$(10.90) $1.05
 $1.84
Diluted net income (loss) per common share$(10.90) $1.04
 $1.82
Stock options, restricted(a) For Fiscal 2017, due to a loss for the period, no incremental shares and performance share unitsare included because the effect would be anti-dilutive.
Securities for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 for 657,823, 24,140 and December 27, 2014 for 24,140, 48,538 and 18,089 shares, respectively, have been excluded from the above calculation as they were anti-dilutive.
The Company has the intent and ability to settle the principal portion of its Convertible Notes in cash, and as such, has applied the treasury stock method, which has resulted in the underlying convertible shares, and related warrants, being anti-dilutive in Fiscal 2017, 2016 and 2015 as the Company’s average stock price from the date of issuance of the Convertible Notes through December 31, 201630, 2017 was less than the conversion price.price as well as less than the strike price of the warrant transaction. Refer to Note 8.7. Credit Arrangements for additional information on the Convertible Notes.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements— Except as noted below, the Company has considered all new accounting pronouncements and has concluded that there are no new pronouncements that may have a material impact on its results of operations, financial condition, or cash flows, based on current information.
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2014-09 (“ASU 2014-09”), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). Under ASU 2014-09, an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In July 2015, the FASB deferred the effective date of ASU 2014-09 by one year. ASU 2014-09 will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017 for public companies and early adoption of ASU 2014-09 is permitted for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company currently expectshas completed the assessment of each of its performance obligations, has developed processes to identify and analyze its contract assets and contract liabilities and to compile the information necessary to comply with the related disclosure requirements. Based on this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. However,assessment, the Company is still evaluatingwill apply the modified retrospective method for the transition to ASU 2014-09 includingand no adjustments to the determinationopening balance of the transition approach itretained earnings for Fiscal 2018 will utilize.be required to be recorded under this guidance.
In February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-02 (“ASU 2016-02”), Leases (Topic 842). ASU 2016-02 was issued by the FASB to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. The main difference
Table of Contents

between previous GAAP and Topic 842 is the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities by lessees for those leases classified as operating leases under previous GAAP. ASU 2016-02 will require modified retrospective application at the beginning of our first quarter of Fiscal 2019, but permits adoption in an earlier period. TheAlthough the Company is still evaluating ASU 2016-02, the Company currently expects this guidance will not have a material impact on the Company'sits results of operations. However, the Company is still evaluating
Table of Contents

ASU 2016-02 in order to determine the impact of this guidance on the Company’s balance sheet and anticipatesoperations, however, this guidance will result in a significant increase to long-term assets and liabilities on the Company's balance sheet given we havethe Company has a significant number of leases. The Company is also in the process of identifying changes to its business processes, systems and controls to support the adoption of ASU 2016-02 in Fiscal 2019.
In March 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2016-09 (“ASU 2016-09”), Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2016-09 addresses simplification of several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 is effective for public companies for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption ofThe Company adopted ASU 2016-09 is permitted. The Company has evaluated ASU 2016-09prospectively in the first quarter of Fiscal 2017. All excess tax benefits and does not expectdeficiencies in the impact of this guidance to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements. However, under certain circumstances, this guidance could have an impact on the Company’s effective tax rate as changes between taxcurrent and book treatment of equity compensationfuture periods will be recognized in income tax expense in the provision for income taxes beginningCompany's consolidated statements of operations in Fiscal 2017. The Company currently estimates the adoption of this guidancereporting period in which they occur. This will increaseresult in increased volatility in the Company's effective tax rate by 1.1 percentage points inrate. For Fiscal 2017.2017, the Company recognized discrete tax expense related to the excess tax deficiencies from stock-based compensation of $1.0 million.
3. Acquisitions
Nutri-Force
On June 6, 2014, the Company acquired all of the outstanding equity interests of Nutri-Force. The total purchase price was $86.1 million in cash, which includes $5.0 million of contingent consideration which was paid in Fiscal 2015. See Note 15. Segment and Product Data for additional information. The acquisition was funded by cash on hand. The results of operations of the acquired business are included in the Company’s results from the acquisition date.
The Company has recorded its accounting for this acquisition in accordance with accounting guidance on business combinations. The acquisition resulted in goodwill primarily related to the expected benefits resulting from vertical integration as well as growth opportunities. The Company recorded $1.9 million and $4.0 million of acquisition and integration related costs during Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014, respectively, which are included in the consolidated statement of income within selling, general and administrative expenses.
The purchase price of the acquisition has been allocated to the net tangible and intangible assets acquired, with the remainder recorded as goodwill on the basis of estimated fair values. The goodwill was allocated to the Company’s manufacturing segment. The allocation is as follows (in thousands):
Consideration transferred$81,538
  
Working capital adjustment(487) 
Estimated contingent consideration4,041
(a) 
Total consideration$85,092
  
Less: net identifiable assets acquired  
Current assets33,798
  
Non-current assets10,008
  
Intangible assets18,800
  
Current liabilities(10,150) 
Total net identifiable assets acquired$52,456
  
Goodwill$32,636
  
(a)In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2014, the Company recorded approximately $1.0 million of additional contingent consideration, which is included in the consolidated statement of income within selling, general and administrative expenses.
As a result of fair value accounting for the acquisition, current assets includes an inventory valuation step-up of $4.5 million, which was charged to cost of goods sold during Fiscal 2014. Intangible assets consist of brands totaling $10.0 million, customer relationships of $7.5 million and internally-developed software of $1.3 million which are being amortized over their estimated useful lives of 18 years, 20 years and 5 years, respectively. The goodwill of $32.6 million is being amortized for tax purposes.
Table of Contents

From June 6, 2014 through December 27, 2014, the acquired business generated net sales to third parties of $40.3 million and a pre-tax net loss of $1.8 million, excluding acquisition and integration costs. The pre-tax net loss includes the $4.5 million of charges related to the inventory valuation step-up noted above. The results represent the manufacturing segment. Pro forma results are not presented as the acquisition was not significant to the operating results for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 or Fiscal 2014.
4. Inventories
The components of inventories are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Finished goods$222,046
 $211,879
$221,381
 $222,046
Work-in-process7,566
 6,180
4,436
 7,566
Raw materials12,124
 8,771
8,583
 12,124
$241,736
 $226,830
$234,400
 $241,736
5.4. Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Goodwill is allocated between the Company’s segments (reporting units), retail, direct and manufacturing. The following table discloses the carrying value of all intangible assets (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Impairment Charges Net 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Net
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairment Charges (1) Net 
Gross
Carrying
Amount
 
Accumulated
Amortization
 Accumulated Impairment Charges (1) Net
Intangible assets:                            
Goodwill$243,269
 $
 $32,636
 $210,633
 $243,269
 $
 $243,269
$243,269
 $
 $243,269
 $
 $243,269
 $
 $32,636
 $210,633
Tradenames - Indefinite-lived68,405
 
 
 68,405
 68,405
 
 68,405
68,405
 
 59,405
 9,000
 68,405
 
 
 68,405
Brands10,000
 1,435
 
 8,565
 10,000
 880
 9,120
10,000
 1,991
 
 8,009
 10,000
 1,435
 
 8,565
Customer relationships7,500
 906
 6,594
 
 7,500
 594
 6,906
7,500
 906
 6,594
 
 7,500
 906
 6,594
 
Tradenames - Definite-lived4,964
 3,073
 
 1,891
 4,673
 2,722
 1,951
5,392
 3,352
 
 2,040
 4,964
 3,073
 
 1,891
Software1,300
 672
 
 628
 1,300
 412
 888
1,300
 932
 
 368
 1,300
 672
 
 628
$335,438
 $6,086
 39,230
 $290,122
 $335,147
 $4,608
 $330,539
$335,866
 $7,181
 309,268
 $19,417
 $335,438
 $6,086
 $39,230
 $290,122
    
(1)During the second quarter of Fiscal 2017, the Company experienced a significant reduction to its market capitalization. As a result of changed market conditions and the Company's updated initiatives for the second half of Fiscal 2017, the Company revised the outlook for Fiscal 2017 and updated its long-range plan to reflect its operations in this increasingly competitive environment. Based on these factors, the Company concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the retail reporting unit and therefore interim impairment tests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. The results of the interim goodwill impairment test indicated that the carrying value of the
Intangible amortization expense
Table of Contents

retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value, and in accordance with the early adoption of ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Simplifying the Test for Fiscal 2016, Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was $1.5Goodwill Impairment, the Company recorded an impairment charge on the goodwill of its retail segment of $164.3 million $2.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The annual impairment tests for goodwill and tradenames were performed during the fourthsecond quarter of Fiscal 2016.2017, of which $130.9 million is not deductible for income tax purposes.
InDuring the third quarter of Fiscal 2016,2017, the Company performed a quantitative analysis ofexperienced another significant reduction to its retail and direct reporting units and determined that the fair value of these reporting units was greater that their respective carrying values.market capitalization. As a result, the Company believes the fair values of each of these reporting units and indefinite-lived tradenames substantially exceeds their respective carrying values.
Since the acquisition in Fiscal 2014, Nutri-Force, our manufacturing reporting unit, has experienced disruption in its ability to optimize production capacity, volatility in sales performance, loss of third party customers, and correspondingly has experienced lower service levels to customers. Based upon the operating results of Nutri-Force during the three months ended June 25, 2016, we concluded that an impairment trigger occurred for the manufacturingretail reporting unit and therefore aninterim impairment test wastests of goodwill and other intangible assets were performed. A discounted cash flow model was prepared using the internal forecast, including an estimate of long-term future growth rates and a discount rate determined by management to be commensurate with the risk inherent in this forecast.The Company also had recently updated its long-range plan. The results of this analysis determined the fair value of the manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its carrying value,interim goodwill and as a result, we concluded the goodwill assigned to the reporting unit was not impaired. However, the fair value of the manufacturing reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 5%, which was not considered to be a substantial
Table of Contents

excess over the carrying value. While financial results during the three months ended September 24, 2016 did not improve, we continued to closely monitor the financial performance of Nutri-Force. During the fiscal fourth quarter, the performance of Nutri-Force declined and expectations of future years were reduced significantly due to on-going churn in third party customers and its inability to reduce costs. In the fiscal fourth quarter, the Company performed its annual quantitative analysis of the manufacturing reporting unit as of October 22, 2016, based on the operating plan for Fiscal 2017, and then a subsequent analysis based on an updated long range projection due to further deterioration in operating results, whichother intangible assets impairment tests indicated that the carrying value of Nutri-Forcethe Vitamin Shoppe tradename exceeded its fair value and that the carrying value of the retail reporting unit exceeded its fair value. The Company proceeded to step two of therecorded an impairment analysis. Basedcharge on the resultsVitamin Shoppe tradename of these analyses,$59.4 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017. The Company also recorded an impairment charge for the remaining goodwill of its retail segment of $46.3 million during the third quarter of Fiscal 2017, which is not deductible for income tax purposes.
In the fourth quarter of Fiscal 2016, the Company recorded impairment charges on goodwill of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force, which are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in$6.6 million. Both of these charges were on the consolidated statementintangible assets of income.the manufacturing reporting unit.
There have been no impairment charges related to goodwill or other intangibles during Fiscal 2015, or in prior years.
Total goodwill impairment charges during Fiscal 2017 were $210.6 million, of which $177.2 million is not deductible for income tax purposes, as reflected in the effective tax rate benefit for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017. In addition, the tradename impairment charge of $59.4 million and the tax deductible portion of the goodwill impairment charges of $33.4 million resulted in an increase to the Company's net deferred tax assets of $23.7 million for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017.
Intangible amortization expense for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2014.2015 was $1.1 million, $1.5 million and $2.3 million, respectively.
The useful lives of the Company’s definite-lived intangible assets are between 35 years to 18 years. The expected amortization expense on definite-lived intangible assets on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet at December 31, 2016,30, 2017, is as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal 2017$1,073
Fiscal 20181,067
$1,089
Fiscal 2019915
958
Fiscal 2020807
850
Fiscal 2021807
850
Fiscal 2022850
Thereafter6,415
5,820
$11,084
$10,417

6.5. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consists of the following (in thousands):
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Leasehold improvements$173,216
 $168,830
$183,657
 $173,216
Furniture, fixtures and equipment184,786
 170,391
205,738
 184,786
Software78,089
 59,049
98,359
 78,089
436,091
 398,270
487,754
 436,091
Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization(305,777) (274,222)(341,396) (305,777)
Subtotal130,314
 124,048
146,358
 130,314
Construction in progress8,818
 16,110
3,675
 8,818
$139,132
 $140,158
$150,033
 $139,132
Table of Contents

Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment for the fiscal years ended December 30, 2017, December 31, 2016 and December 26, 2015 and December 27, 2014 was approximately $38.1 million, $37.3 million $36.1 million and $32.5$36.1 million, respectively. The Company recognized store impairment charges of $4.8 million during Fiscal 2017 on fixed assets related to 34 of its underperforming retail locations still in use in the Company’s operations. The Company recognized store impairment charges of $0.8 million during Fiscal 2016 on fixed assets related to five of its underperforming retail locations still in use in the Company’s operations. The Company recognized store impairment charges of $1.2 million during Fiscal 2015 on fixed assets related to five of its underperforming retail locations, threetwo of which are still in use in the Company’sCompany's operations and three retail locations in Ontario, Canada which the Company closed during Fiscal 2016. The Company recognized impairmentImpairment charges on the fixed assets of $0.4 millionretail locations during Fiscal 2014 on2017, 2016 and 2015 represented the full net book value of the fixed assets related to three of its underperformingthese retail locations, two of which are still in use in the Company's operations.locations.
Depreciation and amortization expense on property and equipment for the Company’s retail and direct segments is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income. Depreciation on property and equipment used in the manufacturing process is recorded in cost of goods sold on the consolidated statements of income. All other depreciation and amortization for the manufacturing segment is recorded in selling, general and administrative expenses on the consolidated statements of income.
Table of Contents

7.6. Accrued Expenses and Other Current Liabilities
Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following (in thousands):
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Accrued salaries and related expenses$13,861
 $10,115
Sales tax payable and related expenses7,669
 6,975
Other accrued expenses30,760
 30,686
 $52,290
 $47,776
The Company is involved in ongoing examinations with various taxing authorities regarding non-income based tax matters for Fiscal 2016 and prior. The final obligation to these authorities may be subject to either an increase or decrease to the initial estimates recorded. As of December 31, 2016, the Company believes the reserves for these matters are adequately provided for in its consolidated financial statements, the reserves of which are reflected in “Sales tax payable and related expenses” in the table above.
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Accrued salaries and related expenses$18,094
 $13,861
Sales tax payable and related expenses7,138
 7,669
Other accrued expenses34,336
 30,760
 $59,568
 $52,290
8.7. Credit Arrangements
Convertible Senior Notes due 2020
On December 9, 2015, the Company issued $143.8 million of its 2.25% Convertible Senior Notes due 2020 (the “Convertible Notes”). The Convertible Notes are senior unsecured obligations of VSI. Interest on the Convertible Notes is payable on June 1 and December 1 of each year commencing on June 1, 2016 until their maturity date of December 1, 2020. The Company may not redeem the Convertible Notes prior to the maturity date.
Prior to July 1, 2020, the Convertible Notes will be convertible only under the following circumstances: (1) during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter ending on March 31, 2016, if the last reported sale price of the common stock for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) during a period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter is greater than or equal to 130% of the conversion price on each applicable trading day; (2) during the five5 business day period after any ten10 consecutive trading day period in which the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes for such trading day was less than 98% of the product of the last reported sale price of our common stock and the conversion rate on each such trading day; or (3) upon the occurrence of specified corporate events. On or after July 1, 2020 until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may convert all or any portion of their notes, in multiples of $1,000 principal amount, at the option of the holder regardless of the foregoing circumstances.
The Convertible Notes will beare convertible at an initial conversion rate of 25.1625 shares of the Company’s common stock per $1,000 principal amount of the Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initiala conversion price of approximately $39.74. The conversion rate will beis subject to adjustment in some events but will not be adjusted for any accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, following certain corporate events that occur prior to the maturity date, the Company is required to increase, in certain circumstances, the conversion rate for a holder who elects to convert its Convertible Notes in connection with such a corporate event including customary conversion rate adjustments in connection with a “make-whole fundamental change” as defined. Upon conversion, the Company may satisfy its conversion obligation by paying or delivering, as applicable, cash, shares of its common stock or a combination of cash and shares of its common stock, at its election.
The Company allocated the principal amount of the Convertible Notes between its liability and equity components (see table below). The carrying amount of the liability component was determined by measuring the fair value of a similar debt instrument of similar credit quality and maturity that did not have the conversion feature. The carrying amount of the equity component, representing the embedded conversion option, was determined by deducting the fair value of the liability component from the principal amount of the Convertible Notes as a whole. The equity component was recorded to additional paid-in capital and is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification. The excess of the principal amount of the Convertible Notes over the carrying amount of the liability component was recorded as a debt discount, and is being amortized to interest expense using an effective interest rate of 3.8% over the term of the Convertible Notes. The Company allocated the total amount of transaction costs incurred to the liability and equity components using the same proportions as the proceeds from the Convertible Notes. Transaction costs attributable to the liability component were recorded
Table of Contents

as a direct deduction from the liability component of the Convertible Notes, and are being amortized to interest expense using
Table of Contents

the effective interest method through the maturity date. Transaction costs attributable to the equity component were netted with the equity component of the Convertible Notes in additional paid-in capital.
The Convertible Notes consist of the following components (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Liability component:      
Principal$143,750
 $143,750
$143,750
 $143,750
Conversion feature(24,800) (24,800)(24,800) (24,800)
Liability portion of debt issuance costs(3,802) (3,800)(3,802) (3,802)
Amortization5,726
 260
11,267
 5,726
Net carrying amount$120,874
 $115,410
$126,415
 $120,874
Equity component:      
Conversion feature$24,800
 $24,800
$24,800
 $24,800
Equity portion of debt issuance costs(793) (793)(793) (793)
Deferred taxes941
 941
941
 941
Net carrying amount$24,948
 $24,948
$24,948
 $24,948
    
In connection with the issuance of the Convertible Notes, the Company entered into convertible note hedge transactions for which it paid an aggregate $26.4 million. In addition, the Company sold warrants for which it received aggregate proceeds of $13.0 million. The convertible note hedge transactions are expected generally to reduce potential dilution of the Company’s common stock upon any conversion of notes and/or offset any cash payments the Company is required to make in excess of the principal amount of converted notes. However, the warrant transaction could separately have a dilutive effect to the extent that the market value per share of the Company’s common stock exceeds the applicable strike price of the warrant transactions, which is approximately $52.99 at inception. As these transactions meet certain accounting criteria, the convertible note hedge and warrant transactions are recorded in stockholders’ equity, are not accounted for as derivatives and are not remeasured each reporting period.
The net proceeds from the Convertible Notes and related transactions of $125.7 million, net of commissions and offering costs of $4.6 million, are beingwere used to repurchase shares of the Company’s common stock under the Company’s share repurchase programs. Refer to Note 11. Share Repurchase Programs for additional information.
Revolving Credit Facility
As of December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 2015,31, 2016, the Company had $11.0$12.0 million and $8.0$11.0 million respectively, of borrowings outstanding on its Revolving Credit Facility.Facility, respectively.
In May 2017, the Company executed an amendment to its Revolving Credit Facility, which provides for an extension of the maturity date to May 9, 2022, provided that the maturity date would be any day on or after September 2, 2020 only if the Company did not on any such day have enough liquidity to retire its Convertible Notes then outstanding, if any. The amendment also provides for a reduction of the interest rate under the Revolving Credit Facility, as noted below.
Subject to the terms of the Revolving Credit Facility, which has a maturity date of October 11, 2018, the Company may borrow up to $90.0 million, with a Company option to increase the facility up to a total of $150.0 million. The availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is subject to a borrowing base calculated on the value of certain accounts receivable as well as certain inventory of the Company. The obligations thereunder are secured by a security interest in substantially all of the assets of the Company. Under the Revolving Credit Facility, VSI has guaranteed the Company’s obligations, and Industries and its wholly-owned subsidiaries have each guaranteed the obligations of the other respective entities. The Revolving Credit Facility provides for affirmative and negative covenants affecting the Company. The Revolving Credit Facility restricts, among other things, the Company’s ability to incur indebtedness, create or permit liens on the Company’s assets, declare or pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments, consolidate, merge or recapitalize, sell assets, make certain investments, loans or other advances, enter into transactions with affiliates, change our line of business, and restricts the types of hedging activities the Company can enter into. The largest amount borrowed at any given point during Fiscal 20162017 was $27.0$38.0 million. The unused available line of credit under the Revolving Credit Facility at December 31, 201630, 2017 was $76.1$74.4 million.
Table of Contents

Borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility accrue interest, at the Company’s option, at the rate per annum based on an “alternative base rate” plus 0.25% or 0.50%0.00%, 0.125% or0.25% or the adjusted Eurodollar rate plus 1.25%1.00%, 1.125% or 1.50%1.25%, in each case with the higherhighest spread applicable in the event that the aggregate amount of the borrowingsaverage excess collateral availability under the Revolving Credit Facility exceeds 50%is less than 33% of the borrowing base availability under the Revolving Credit Facility, the second highest spread applicable in the event that the average excess collateral availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is less than 66% and greater than or equal to 33% of the borrowing base availability under the Revolving Credit Facility and the lowest spread applicable in the event that the average excess collateral availability under the Revolving Credit Facility is greater than or equal to 66% of the borrowing base availability under the Revolving Credit Facility. The weighted average interest rate for the Revolving Credit facilityFacility for Fiscal 20162017 was 1.78%2.21%. The commitment fee on the undrawn portion of the $90.0 million Revolving Credit Facility was 0.25% as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 2015.
Table of Contents

31, 2016.
Interest expense, net for Fiscal 2017, 2016 2015 and 20142015 consists of the following (in thousands):
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Amortization of debt discount on Convertible Notes$4,690
 $223
 $
$4,781
 $4,690
 $223
Interest on Convertible Notes3,335
 159
 
3,270
 3,335
 159
Amortization of deferred financing fees957
 237
 164
898
 957
 237
Interest / fees on the Revolving Credit Facility and other interest541
 487
 344
752
 541
 487
Interest income
 (1) (13)
 
 (1)
Interest expense, net$9,523
 $1,105
 $495
$9,701
 $9,523
 $1,105

9.8. Income Taxes
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 consists of the following (in thousands): 
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Current:          
Federal$20,923
 $30,696
 $38,432
$(501) $20,923
 $30,696
State3,850
 5,385
 6,438
(28) 3,850
 5,385
Total current24,773
 36,081
 44,870
(529) 24,773
 36,081
Deferred:          
Federal(11,655) (1,283) (3,497)(14,461) (11,655) (1,283)
State(2,028) (81) (453)(5,373) (2,028) (81)
Total deferred(13,683) (1,364) (3,950)(19,834) (13,683) (1,364)
Provision for income taxes$11,090
 $34,717
 $40,920
Provision (benefit) for income taxes$(20,363) $11,090
 $34,717
A reconciliation of the statutory Federal income tax rate and effective rate of the provision for income taxes is as follows:
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Federal statutory rate35.0 % 35.0% 35.0%35.0 % 35.0 % 35.0%
State income taxes, net of Federal income tax benefit2.5 % 3.4% 4.2%4.0 % 2.5 % 3.4%
Impairment of goodwill(25.5)% 
 
Revaluation of deferred tax assets and liabilities (1)(5.6)% 
 
Write-off of Canada investment(8.3)% 
 
(0.1)% (8.3)% 
Other1.6 % 1.1% 0.9%(0.3)% 1.6 % 1.1%
Effective tax rate30.8 % 39.5% 40.1%7.5 % 30.8 % 39.5%
Table of Contents


(1)The Tax Cut and Jobs Act of 2017 (“U.S. Tax Reform”) was enacted on December 22, 2017, reducing the statutory federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, effective January 1, 2018. As required, the Company determined a reasonable estimate for certain effects of U.S. Tax Reform and recorded that estimate as a provisional amount. Due to the Company’s deferred tax position being a net asset, the provisional remeasurement of the deferred tax assets and liabilities resulted in a $15.3 million discrete tax expense which lowered the effective tax rate by 5.6% in Fiscal 2017. Our federal income tax expense for periods beginning in Fiscal 2018 will be based on the new tax rate. The provisional remeasurement amount is anticipated to change as data becomes available allowing more accurate scheduling of the deferred tax assets and liabilities primarily related to depreciable assets, inventory, employee compensation and commissions.
Additionally on December 22, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, which addresses how a company recognizes provisional amounts when a company does not have the necessary information available, prepared or analyzed (including computations) in reasonable detail to complete its accounting for the effect of the changes in the U.S. Tax Reform. The measurement period ends when a company has obtained, prepared and analyzed the information necessary to finalize its accounting, but cannot extend beyond one year. As such, the Company is reporting the impacts of the U.S. Tax Reform provisionally based upon reasonable estimates. The impacts are not yet finalized as they are dependent on factors and analysis not yet known or fully completed, including but not limited to, depreciation, additional effect of the rate change on the ending deferred balances and the issuance of additional guidance, as well as our ongoing analysis of the U.S Tax Reform.

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of temporary differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and amounts used for income tax purposes. The temporary differences and carryforwards that give rise to deferred tax assets and liabilities at December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 201531, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Net operating loss carryforward$2,535
 $1,806
Deferred rent10,775
 11,389
Tenant allowance3,938
 4,215
Deferred sales1,019
 4,011
General accrued liabilities7,132
 6,790
Deferred wages and compensation863
 569
Inventory7,443
 7,205
Equity compensation expense3,815
 3,400
Debt995
 1,002
Other2,735
 3,299

41,250
 43,686
Valuation allowance(2,535) (1,806)
Deferred tax assets38,715
 41,880
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Trade name and goodwill(15,590) (29,777)
Accumulated depreciation(4,589) (9,488)
Prepaid expenses(1,689) (2,012)
Deferred tax liabilities(21,868) (41,277)
Net deferred tax asset$16,847
 $603
The net deferred tax assets are included in other long-term assets on the consolidated balance sheets.
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Deferred tax assets:   
Net operating loss carryforward$2,820
 $2,535
Deferred rent7,012
 10,775
Tenant allowance3,659
 3,938
Deferred sales
 1,019
General accrued liabilities4,660
 7,132
Deferred wages and compensation1,594
 863
Inventory8,078
 7,443
Equity compensation expense2,582
 3,815
Debt583
 995
Trade name and goodwill10,850
 
Other2,830
 2,735

44,668
 41,250
Valuation allowance(2,820) (2,535)
Deferred tax assets41,848
 38,715
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Trade name and goodwill
 (15,590)
Accumulated depreciation(3,078) (4,589)
Prepaid expenses(1,492) (1,689)
Deferred tax liabilities(4,570) (21,868)
Net deferred tax asset$37,278
 $16,847
Management periodically assesses whether the Company is more likely than not to realize some or all of its deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, with the exception of $2.5$2.8 million of deferred tax assets arising from a foreign and state
Table of Contents

net operating loss carryforward against which there is a valuation allowance (see above table), management determined that the Company is more likely than not to realize the deferred tax assets detailed above. Realization of deferred tax assets associated with the state net operating loss carryforwards is dependent upon generating sufficient taxable income prior to their expiration by tax jurisdiction.
The Company and its subsidiaries file income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various state jurisdictions, Puerto Rico and Canada. The Company recognizes interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal examinations by tax authorities for years before 2014 and for state examinations before 2010.2011. However, the tax authorities still have the ability to review the relevance of net operating loss carryforwards created in closed years if such tax attributes are utilized in open years (subsequent to 2010)2011).
The Company has domestic (U.S. state) and foreign net operating losses of approximately $8.2$15.5 million and $8.3$7.9 million at December 31, 2016,30, 2017, against which a full valuation allowance is recorded. Domestic net operating losses generated will continue to expire annually through Fiscal 2032.2033. The Company’s foreign net operating loss is generated through operations in Canada, and will expire in Fiscal 2035.
10.9. Stock Based Compensation
Equity Incentive Plans - The Company has two equity incentive plans that provide stock based compensation to certain directors, officers, consultants and employees of the Company; the 2006 Stock Option Plan (the “2006 Plan”) and the Vitamin Shoppe 2009 Equity Incentive Plan amended and restated through April 2012 (the “2009 Plan”), under which the Company has granted stock options (includes non-qualified as well as performance based stock options), restricted shares (includes time based as well as performance based restricted shares), performance share units and restricted share units. The issuance of up to 7,453,678 shares of common stock is authorized under these plans. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, there were
Table of Contents

2,065,074 1,532,141 shares available to grant under both plans, which includes 161,185198,561 shares currently held by the Company as treasury stock. Restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units are issued at a value not less than the fair market value of the common shares on the date of the grant and stock options are exercisable at no less than the fair market value of the underlying shares on the date of grant. Equity awards of restricted shares generally shall become vested between two and three years subsequent to the date on which such equity grants were awarded. Performance share units shall become vested approximately three years subsequent to the date on which such equity grants were awarded. Stock options awarded shall become vested in three or four equal increments on each of the anniversaries of the date on which such equity grants were awarded and generally have a maximum term of 10 years. However, regarding performance based restricted shares, performance share units and performance based stock options, vesting is dependent not only on the passage of time, but also on the attainment of certain internal performance metrics. The vesting requirements for performance based restricted shares and performance based stock options permit a catch-up of vesting at the end of the vesting period. For accounting purposes, the expense for performance based stock options, performance based restricted shares and performance share units is calculated and recorded, based on the determination that the achievement of the pre-established performance targets are probable, over the relevant service period. Restricted share units generally shall become vested quarterly, or one year, subsequent to the date on which such equity grants were awarded.
The following table summarizes restricted shares for the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and changes during Fiscal 2016:2017: 
Number of
Unvested
Restricted
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
Number of
Unvested
Restricted
Shares
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
Unvested at December 26, 2015398,562
 $42.65
Unvested at December 31, 2016372,817
 $35.20
Granted181,712
 $29.45
587,181
 $13.86
Vested(104,095) $46.87
(95,503) $41.44
Canceled/forfeited(103,362) $42.06
(140,391) $27.05
Unvested at December 31, 2016372,817
 $35.20
Unvested at December 30, 2017724,104
 $18.65
The total intrinsic value of restricted shares vested during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was $1.5 million, $2.5 million and $6.3 million, and $5.7 million, respectively.
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes stock options for the 2006 Plan and 2009 PlansPlan as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and changes during Fiscal 2016:2017:
Number of
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Number of
Options
 
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Life (years)
 
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in thousands)
Outstanding at December 26, 2015284,838
 $22.65
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2016502,797
 $25.30
  
Granted264,072
 $29.21
  
 $
  
Exercised(5,282) $17.11
  (100,000) $15.11
  
Canceled/forfeited(40,831) $33.19
  (93,909) $28.09
  
Outstanding at December 31, 2016502,797
 $25.30
 5.39 $1,443
Vested or expected to vest at December 31, 2016484,921
 $25.30
 5.39 
Vested and exercisable at December 31, 2016256,797
 $21.62
 1.65 $1,422
Outstanding at December 30, 2017308,888
 $27.74
 5.86 $
Vested or expected to vest at December 30, 2017300,494
 $27.74
 5.86 
Vested and exercisable at December 30, 2017180,126
 $26.83
 4.12 $
The total intrinsic value of options exercised during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was $0.7 million, $0.1 million $1.0 million and $16.0$1.0 million, respectively. The cash received from options exercised during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was $1.5 million, $0.1 million $1.4 million and $9.4$1.4 million, respectively.
TableNo stock options were granted in Fiscal 2017 and in Fiscal 2015. The weighted average grant date fair value of Contentsstock options was $7.96 for Fiscal 2016. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
December 31, 2016
Expected dividend yield%
Weighted average expected volatility32.4%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate1.2%
Expected holding period4.00 years
The following table summarizes performance share units for the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and changes during Fiscal 2016:2017:
Number of Unvested Performance Share Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair ValueNumber of Unvested Performance Share Units Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested at December 26, 2015
 
Unvested at December 31, 2016125,015
 $30.43
Granted134,927
 $30.42
241,485
 $19.10
Vested
 

 $
Canceled/forfeited(9,912) $30.26
(78,135) $24.94
Unvested at December 31, 2016125,015
 $30.43
Unvested at December 30, 2017288,365
 $22.43
Performance share units granted during Fiscal 2017 and 2016 shall become vestedvest on December 28, 2019 and December 29, 2018, respectively, if the performance criteria are achieved. Performance share units can vest at a range of 25%0% to 150% based on the achievement of pre-established performance targets.
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes restricted share units for the 2009 Plan as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and changes during Fiscal 2016:2017:
Number of
Unvested
Restricted
Share Units
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
Number of
Unvested
Restricted
Share Units
 
Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair
Value
Unvested at December 26, 201511,280
 $37.25
Unvested at December 31, 201615,390
 $30.71
Granted21,451
 $30.68
54,078
 $12.04
Vested(17,341) $34.92
(29,760) $21.89
Canceled/forfeited
 $

 $
Unvested at December 31, 201615,390
 $30.71
Unvested at December 30, 201739,708
 $11.90
The total intrinsic value of restricted share units vested during Fiscal 2017, Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 was $0.1 million, $0.4 million $0.6 million and $0.3$0.6 million, respectively.
Compensation expense attributable to stock-based compensation for Fiscal 2017 was $6.1 million, for Fiscal 2016 was $6.3 million and for Fiscal 2015 was $5.5 million and for Fiscal 2014 was $6.9 million. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, the remaining unrecognized stock based compensation expense for non-vested stock options, restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units to be expensed in future periods is $7.6$7.2 million, and the related weighted average period over which it is expected to be recognized is 1.71.6 years. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates. The Company estimates forfeitures based on its historical forfeiture rate since the inception of granting stock based awards. The estimated value of future forfeitures for stock options, restricted shares, performance share units and restricted share units as of December 31, 201630, 2017 is approximately $0.6 million.
The weighted average grant date fair value of stock options was $7.96 and $18.99 for Fiscal 2016 and Fiscal 2014, respectively. For Fiscal 2014, this valuation represents the fair value of subsequent annual tranches of performance based stock option grants. No stock options were granted in Fiscal 2015. The fair value of each option grant was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model with the following assumptions:
 December 31, 2016 December 27, 2014
Expected dividend yield% %
Weighted average expected volatility32.4% 35.3%
Weighted average risk-free interest rate1.2% 1.4%
Expected holding period(s)4.00 years
 4.00 - 4.43 years
Treasury Stock — As part of the Company’s equity incentive plans, the Company makes required tax payments on behalf of employees as their restricted shares vest. The Company withholds the number of vested shares having a value on the date of vesting equal to the minimum statutory tax obligation. The shares withheld are recorded as treasury shares. During Fiscal 2016,2017, the Company purchased 41,05137,376 shares in settlement of employees’ tax obligations for a total of $1.2$0.6 million. The
Table of Contents

Company accounts for treasury stock using the cost method. These shares are available to grant under the Company’s equity incentive plans.
10. Restructuring Costs
Nutri-Force Restructuring
During Fiscal 2017, the Company engaged outside consultants to perform an assessment of the operations of Nutri-Force and to assist in the development of initiatives required to improve the performance of this business. The initiatives identified are focused on improving the efficiency of manufacturing processes, eliminating unprofitable SKUs, reducing third party sales, and reducing costs. The implementation of this plan began during the second quarter of Fiscal 2017 and has been substantially completed in Fiscal 2017.
Costs incurred for the restructuring of Nutri-Force during the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):

 Fiscal Year Ended
 December 30, 2017
Inventory obsolescence charges$5,375
Outside consulting fees3,304
Equipment impairment charges1,820
Severance and other expenses and charges1,809
 $12,308

The inventory and equipment impairment charges are included in cost of goods sold and the outside consulting fees are included in selling, general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations.
Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the activity related to the Company's liabilities for the restructuring of Nutri-Force (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2016$
  Outside consulting fees expense3,304
  Severance and other expense1,612
  Outside consulting fees payments(3,304)
  Severance and other payments(1,124)
Balance as of December 30, 2017$488
Closing of Distribution Center
In August 2017, the Company announced its intention to close the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center prior to or by the August 31, 2018 lease expiration. The transition of distribution operations to the Company's other distribution centers has been substantially completed during Fiscal 2017.
Costs incurred related to the closing of the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center for the fiscal year ended December 30, 2017 are as follows (in thousands):
 Fiscal Year Ended
 December 30, 2017
Inventory obsolescence charges$1,422
Severance and other expenses (1)1,448
Acceleration of depreciation233
 $3,103
(1)Approximately $0.9 million of severance and other expenses related to the closing of the North Bergen, New Jersey distribution center were paid during Fiscal 2017.
Substantially all of these costs are included in cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations.
11. Share Repurchase Programs
TheBeginning in August 2014, the Company’s board of directors approved share repurchase programs that enable the Company to purchase up to an aggregate of $300$370 million of its shares of common stock and/or its Convertible Notes, from time to time over three year periods ending on August 4, 2017, May 5, 2018 and November 22, 2018, respectively.time. As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, 8,064,325 shares of common stock pursuant to these programs, and no Convertible Notes, have been repurchased for a total of $269.9 million. There is approximately $100.1 million remaining in this program which expires on November 22, 2018. The repurchase program doesprograms do not obligate the Company to acquire any specific number of shares of its common stocksecurities and may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason, including market conditions, the cost of repurchasing such shares,securities, the availability of alternative investment opportunities, liquidity, restrictions under the Company's credit agreement, applicable law and other factors deemed appropriate. These factors may also affect
No shares or other securities of the timing and amount of share repurchases.
Company were repurchased under these programs during Fiscal 2017. During Fiscal 2016, and Fiscal 2015, the Company repurchased 1,670,837 and 1,182,990 shares respectively, of its common stock in the open market. The shares were retired upon repurchase. Open market share repurchases were $47.0 million in Fiscal 2016 and $44.2 million in Fiscal 2015 with an average repurchase pricesprice per share of $28.13 and $37.38, respectively.$28.13. In Fiscal 2016, the Company also repurchased 646,666 shares of its common stock for $19.0 million, or $29.40 per share, under a 10b5-1 program which the Company entered into to purchase shares under predetermined criteria.
Additionally, the Company has entered into accelerated share repurchase (“ASR”) arrangements with financial institutions. In exchange for an up-front payment, the financial institutions initially deliver shares of the Company’s common stock. The total number of shares ultimately delivered, and therefore the average repurchase price paid per share, is determined at the end of the purchase period of each ASR based on the volume weighted-average price of the Company’s common stock during that period. The shares are retired in the periods they are delivered, and each up-front payment is accounted for as a reduction to stockholders’ equity in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet in the period the payment was made. The Company reflects each ASR as a repurchase of common stock in the period delivered for purposes of calculating earnings per
Table of Contents

share and as a forward contract indexed to its own common stock. The ASRs met all of the applicable criteria for equity classification, and therefore, were not accounted for as derivative instruments.
The following table summarizes the Company’s ASR arrangements:
Beginning
of ASR
Period
Up-front
Payment
(in millions)
 
Initial Share
Deliveries
 
End
of ASR
Period
 
Final
Shares
Delivered
 
Average
Repurchase
Price
Up-front
Payment
(in millions)
 
Initial Share
Deliveries
 
End
of ASR
Period
 
Final
Shares
Delivered
 
Average
Repurchase
Price
November, 2014$50.0
 982,714
 January, 2015 88,325
 $46.68
December, 2015$50.0
 1,391,940
 February, 2016 235,053
 $30.73
$50.0
 1,391,940
 February, 2016 235,053
 $30.73
In December 2015, the Company also repurchased 1,664,800 shares of its common stock for $51.9 million, or $31.17 per share, from purchasers of the Convertible Notes in privately negotiated transactions.
12. Benefit Plans
The Company sponsors the Vitamin Shoppe Industries, Inc. 401(k) Plan (“401k Plan”). Employees who have completed one month of service are eligible to participate in the 401k Plan. The 401k Plan provides for participant contributions of 1% to 100% of participant compensation into deferred savings, subject to IRS limitations. The 401k Plan provides for Company contributions upon the participant meeting the eligibility requirements. Participants are 100% vested in the Company matching contribution upon receipt. The Company matching contribution is 100% of the first 3% of participant compensation contributed to the 401k Plan and 50% of the next 2% of participant compensation contributed to the 401k Plan. The Company may make discretionary contributions for each 401k Plan year.
The Company recognized expenses for the 401k Plan of $2.3 million in Fiscal 2017, $2.2 million in Fiscal 2016 and $1.9 million in Fiscal 2015 and $1.6 million in Fiscal 2014.2015.

13. Lease Commitments
The Company has non-cancelable real estate operating leases, which expire through 2036. These leases generally contain renewal options for periods ranging from 1 to 10 years and require the Company to pay costs such as real estate taxes and common area maintenance. Contingent rentals are paid based on a percentage of gross sales as defined by lease agreements. The following table provides the net rental expense for all real estate operating leases (in thousands):
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Minimum rentals$122,039
 $117,578
 $107,456
$124,150
 $122,039
 $117,578
Contingent rentals88
 154
 103
88
 88
 154
122,127
 117,732
 107,559
124,238
 122,127
 117,732
Less: Sublease rentals(274) (273) (245)(360) (274) (273)
Net rental expense$121,853
 $117,459
 $107,314
$123,878
 $121,853
 $117,459
As of December 31, 2016,30, 2017, the Company’s real estate lease commitments are as follows (in thousands):
Fiscal year
Total
Operating
Leases (1)
Total
Operating
Leases (1)
2017$122,219
2018112,672
$124,086
201993,886
110,121
202078,064
94,710
202165,630
81,384
202268,014
Thereafter175,018
162,108
$647,489
$640,423
 
(1)Store operating leases included in the above table do not include contingent rent based upon sales volume. Operating leases do not include common area maintenance costs or real estate taxes that are paid to the landlord during the year, which combined represented approximately 18.8%18.3% of our minimum lease obligations for Fiscal 2016.2017.
Table of Contents

14. Legal Proceedings
The Company is party to various lawsuits arising from time to time in the normal course of business, some of which are covered by insurance. As of December 31, 2016, the Company was not party to any material legal proceedings. Although the impact of the final resolution of these matters on the Company’sCompany's financial condition, results of operations or cash flows is not known, management does not believe that the resolution of these lawsuits will have a material adverse effect on the financial condition, results of operations or liquidity of the Company.
In addition, on or about August 22, 2017, a federal securities class action suit was filed in the United States District Court in the District of New Jersey against Vitamin Shoppe and certain officers and directors on behalf of purchasers of Vitamin Shoppe common stock between March 1, 2017 and August 6, 2017. The lawsuit seeks remedies under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, including monetary damages, alleging that the defendants made false and misleading statements regarding the Company's reported goodwill, initiatives designed to improve the Company's financial performance, the Company’s profitability trends, and its financial results. We believe this lawsuit is without merit, and we are vigorously defending the lawsuit.
15. Segment and Product Data
We have increased our focus on customer centric initiatives and being an omni-channel based retailer. As initiatives, including buy online pickup in store and auto-delivery subscription sales, continue to develop, the interrelationship among the ways customers can purchase products from VSI results in sales that are generated and fulfilled across multiple channels. The Company currently operates threehas revised its internal management structure and reporting to align with our omni-channel strategy. The Company believes the historical structure of separate segments for retail stores and e-commerce is no longer representative of the way the business is managed. As a result, in Fiscal 2017, the Company updated its segment reporting to better align with its omni-channel strategy. These changes resulted in a single retail segment that includes fulfilled in store and direct to consumer sales channels. In addition, certain costs previously classified as corporate costs, such as retail and direct management costs, are now allocated to the retail operating segment. Segment results related to prior periods have been revised to conform with this omni-channel structure.
Based upon the revised structure of the Company, there are two reporting segments, retail direct and manufacturing. The operatingreporting segments are segments of the Company for whichhave separate financial information is available and for which operating results are evaluated regularly by executive management in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company’sCompany's management evaluates segment operating results based on several indicators. The primary key performance indicators are sales and operating income for each segment. The table below represents key financial information for each of the Company’sCompany's business segments as well as corporate costs.
The retail segment primarily includes the Company’sCompany's retail stores.stores and websites. The retail segment generates revenue primarily through the sale of VMS products through Vitamin Shoppe and Super Supplements retail stores in the United States and Puerto Rico. The direct segment generates revenue throughRico, and the sale of VMS products primarily through the Company’s websites. The Company’sCompany's websites offer customers online access to a full assortment of approximately 17,000 SKUs. The manufacturing segment supplies the retail and direct segments,segment, along with various thirdsthird parties, with finished products for sale. The Company is currently exploring strategic alternatives related to Nutri-Force, including the potential sale of this subsidiary.
Corporate costs represent all other expenses not allocated to the retail direct or manufacturing segments which include, but are not limited to: human resources, legal, retail management, direct management, finance, information technology, depreciation (primarily related to assets utilized by the retail and direct business segments as well as corporate assets) and amortization, and various other corporate level activity related expenses. Intercompany sales transactions are eliminated in consolidation.
Table of Contents

The Company’s segments are designed to allocate resources internally and provide a framework to determine management responsibility. The Company has allocated $165.3 million and $45.3 million of its recorded goodwill to the retail and direct segments, respectively. The Company does not have identifiable assets separated bybetween its retail segment with the exception of theassets and corporate assets. The identifiable assets of the manufacturing segment which were $62.3$49.3 million and $88.4$62.3 million as of December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 2015,31, 2016, respectively. Capital expenditures for the manufacturing segment during Fiscal 2017 were $1.6 million, during Fiscal 2016 were $2.5 million and during Fiscal 2015 were $3.5 million and from the acquisition date of June 6, 2014 through December 27, 2014 were approximately $0.5 million. At December 31, 201630, 2017 and December 26, 2015,31, 2016, long lived assets of the manufacturing segment were $20.1$16.9 million and $60.4$20.1 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for the manufacturing segment during Fiscal 2017 was $1.1 million, during Fiscal 2016 was $1.7 million and during Fiscal 2015 was $1.5 million and from the acquisition datemillion.
Table of June 6, 2014 through December 27, 2014 was $0.9 million.Contents

The following table contains key financial information of the Company’s business segments (in thousands):
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2016 (1) December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016(1)* December 26, 2015*
Net sales:          
Retail$1,109,202
 $1,081,123
 $1,042,054
$1,146,500
 $1,239,226
 $1,209,948
Direct130,024
 128,825
 130,644
Manufacturing87,684
 91,159
 48,102
81,607
 87,684
 91,159
Segment net sales1,326,910
 1,301,107
 1,220,800
1,228,107
 1,326,910
 1,301,107
Elimination of intersegment revenues(37,667) (34,558) (7,754)(49,413) (37,667) (34,558)
Net sales1,289,243
 1,266,549
 1,213,046
1,178,694
 1,289,243
 1,266,549
Income (loss) from operations:          
Retail197,450
 192,598
 194,864
85,016
 148,552
 154,569
Direct18,737
 20,904
 22,755
Manufacturing (2)(44,223) (1,977) (1,830)
Corporate costs (3)(126,387) (122,532) (113,133)
Income from operations$45,577
 $88,993
 $102,656
Manufacturing(18,305) (44,223) (1,977)
Corporate costs(329,524) (58,752) (63,599)
Income (loss) from operations (2)$(262,813) $45,577
 $88,993
 
* Prior year periods have been revised to present the Company's new reportable segments.

(1)Fiscal 2016 includes a 53rd week. Net sales for the 53rd week were $20.2 million and income from operations for the 53rd week was $3.3 million.

(2)In Fiscal 2016, lossIncome (loss) from operations forincludes (in thousands):
 Fiscal Year Ended
 December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015
Goodwill impairment charges (a)$210,633
 $32,636
 $
Intangible assets impairment charges (b)59,405
 6,594
 
Nutri-Force restructuring costs (c)12,308
 
 
Store impairment charges (d)4,838
 797
 1,177
Distribution center closing costs (e)3,103
 
 
Cost reduction project (f)
 3,761
 
Canada stores closing costs (g)
 1,889
 885
Super Supplements conversion costs (h)
 1,046
 1,766
Reinvention strategy costs (i)
 541
 2,723
Management realignment charges (j)
 
 3,396
Integration costs (k)
 
 1,874
Accounts receivable bad debt reserve charge (l)
 
 1,370
Product write-off (m)
 
 1,330

(a)Impairment charges on the goodwill of the retail segment in Fiscal 2017 and on the goodwill of the manufacturing segment includes impairmentin Fiscal 2016. See Note 4., Goodwill and Intangible Assets for additional information.
(b)Impairment charges of $32.6 million on goodwillthe Vitamin Shoppe tradename in Fiscal 2017 and $6.6 million on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force. In Fiscal 2015, loss from operations for the manufacturing segment includes a $1.4 million charge for accounts receivable for one wholesale customer which were deemed uncollectible, andNutri-Force in Fiscal 2014 includes $4.5 million in charges related to the inventory valuation step up2016. See Note 4., Goodwill and Intangible Assets for inventory sold subsequent to the acquisition of Nutri-Force.additional information.
(3)(c)CorporateThe costs include (in thousands):represent restructuring costs in the manufacturing segment. See Note 10., Restructuring Costs for additional information.
 Fiscal Year Ended
 December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015 December 27, 2014
Depreciation and amortization expenses$37,103
 $37,004
 $32,968
Cost reduction project (a)3,761
 
 
Canada stores closing costs (b)2,057
 
 
Super Supplements conversion costs (c)1,275
 
 
Reinvention strategy costs (d)541
 2,723
 
Management realignment charges (e)
 3,396
 
Acquisition and integration costs (f)
 1,874
 4,777
Contingent consideration for Nutri-Force acquisition
 
 959
(a)(d)Impairment charges on the fixed assets of retail locations.
(e)The costs represent restructuring costs in the retail segment. See Note 10., Restructuring Costs for additional information.
(f)Outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement costcosts reduction opportunities.opportunities included in corporate costs.
(b)(g)ChargesCosts primarily related toinclude lease terminations.termination charges included in the retail segment and corporate costs.
Table of Contents

(c)(h)Costs primarily related to the closure of the Seattle distribution center.center included in the retail segment and corporate costs.
(d)(i)The costs represent outside consultants fees in connection with the Company's "reinvention strategy". included in corporate costs.
Table of Contents

(e)(j)Management realignment charges primarily consist of severance, sign-on bonuses, recruiting and relocation costs.
(f)(k)For Fiscal 2015, representsRepresents integration costs related to the acquisition of Nutri-Force, consisting primarily of professional fees. In Fiscal 2014, represents acquisition costs of $3.4 million and integration costs of $1.4 million ($0.6 million
(l)Represents a charge to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts for Nutri-Force, and $0.8 millionrelated to one wholesale customer that abruptly ceased operations.
(m)Represents a charge to inventory reserves for Super Supplements).the write-off of USPlabs® products which the Company ceased selling.

The following table represents net merchandise sales by major product category (in thousands):
Fiscal Year EndedFiscal Year Ended
Product CategoryDecember 31, 2016 (a) December 26, 2015 (b) December 27, 2014 (b)December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016 (a) December 26, 2015
Vitamins, Minerals, Herbs and Homeopathy$339,597
 $320,872
 $311,863
$328,986
 $339,597
 $320,872
Sports Nutrition408,288
 421,293
 419,804
353,578
 408,288
 421,293
Specialty Supplements308,945
 289,938
 288,045
294,546
 308,945
 289,938
Other230,252
 232,399
 190,285
199,418
 230,252
 232,399
Total1,287,082
 1,264,502
 1,209,997
1,176,528
 1,287,082
 1,264,502
Delivery Revenue2,161
 2,047
 3,049
2,166
 2,161
 2,047
$1,289,243
 $1,266,549
 $1,213,046
$1,178,694
 $1,289,243
 $1,266,549
(a)Fiscal 2016 includes a 53rd week.
(b)Fiscal 2015 and Fiscal 2014 figures have been restated to conform with changes to Fiscal 2016 product category classifications.
For each of the last three years, less than 1.0% of our sales have been derived from international sources.
16. Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The fair value hierarchy requires the categorization of assets and liabilities into three levels based upon the assumptions (inputs) used to price the assets or liabilities. Level 1 provides the most reliable measure of fair value, while Level 3 generally requires significant management judgment. The three levels are defined as follows:
 
Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.
Level 2: Observable inputs other than those included in Level 1. For example, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets or quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in inactive markets.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs reflecting management’s own assumptions about the inputs used in pricing the asset or liability.
The Company’s financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and its Revolving Credit Facility. The Company believes that the recorded values of these financial instruments approximate their fair values due to their nature and respective durations.
The Company's financial instruments also include its Convertible Notes (in thousands):
December 31, 2016 December 26, 2015December 30, 2017 December 31, 2016
Fair Value$111,563
 $119,784
$91,612
 $132,677
Carrying Value(1)120,874
 115,410
126,415
 120,874
(1) Represents the net carrying amount of the liability component of the Convertible Notes.
Subsequent to the issuance of the Company’s 2016 consolidated financial statements, management determined that the allocation of fair value between the liability and equity portion of the Convertible Notes needed to be revised, and accordingly, the fair value previously reported as $111.6 million has been revised to $132.7 million as of December 31, 2016 in the table above.
The fair value of the Convertible Notes was determined based on inputs that are observable in the market or that could be derived from, or corroborated with, observable market data, including the trading price of the Company’s Convertible Notes,
Table of Contents

when available, the Company’s stock price and interest rates based on similar debt issued by parties with credit ratings similar to the Company (Level 1 or 2).
CertainGoodwill, intangible assets and fixed assets are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, that is, the assets are subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances such as when there is evidence of impairment. These measures of fair value, and related inputs, are considered Level 2 or 3 measures under the fair value hierarchy.

17. Selected Quarterly Financial Information (unaudited)
The following table summarizes the Fiscal 20162017 and Fiscal 20152016 quarterly results (in thousands, except for share data):
Fiscal Quarter EndedFiscal Quarter Ended
March June September December (1)March June September December (1)
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016       
Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2017       
Net sales$336,774
 $332,717
 $314,887
 $304,865
$316,901
 $304,837
 $288,186
 $268,770
Gross profit116,247
 107,824
 102,125
 100,160
98,814
 86,615
 86,124
 86,004
Income (loss) from operations27,262
 20,724
 20,273
 (22,682)15,609
 (168,254) (108,335) (1,833)
Net income (loss)14,782
 10,433
 11,363
 (11,614)7,996
 (156,419) (86,150) (17,578)
Net income (loss) per common share:              
Basic$0.60
 $0.44
 $0.48
 $(0.50)$0.35
 $(6.73) $(3.72) $(0.75)
Diluted$0.59
 $0.44
 $0.48
 $(0.49)$0.35
 $(6.73) $(3.72) $(0.75)
Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015       
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016 (2)       
Net sales$336,835
 $322,338
 $313,886
 $293,490
$336,774
 $332,717
 $314,887
 $304,865
Gross profit114,649
 108,260
 104,709
 91,297
116,247
 107,824
 102,125
 100,160
Income from operations30,955
 23,564
 23,357
 11,117
Net income18,700
 14,241
 14,098
 6,132
Net income per common share:       
Income (loss) from operations27,262
 20,724
 20,273
 (22,682)
Net income (loss)14,782
 10,433
 11,363
 (11,614)
Net income (loss) per common share:       
Basic$0.63
 $0.49
 $0.49
 $0.22
$0.60
 $0.44
 $0.48
 $(0.50)
Diluted$0.63
 $0.48
 $0.48
 $0.22
$0.59
 $0.44
 $0.48
 $(0.50)
(1) Net loss for the fiscal quarter ended December 2017 reflects $15.3 million of tax expense resulting from the change in valuation of deferred tax assets and liabilities under U.S. Tax Reform. Net loss for the fiscal quarter ended December 2016 reflects a $3.0 million tax benefit resulting from the write-off of the Canada investment.
(2)Fiscal 2016 includes a 53rd week.
The following table summarizes certain items for Fiscal 20162017 and Fiscal 20152016 which impacted quarterly results on a pre-tax basis (in thousands):
 Fiscal Quarter Ended
 March June September December
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016       
Super Supplements conversion costs (1)$1,046
 $
 $
 $
Canada stores closing costs (2)931
 1,864
 (906) 
Reinvention strategy costs (3)541
 
 
 
Cost reduction project (4)
 1,492
 2,269
 
Impairment charges on goodwill and intangible asset (5)
 
 
 39,230
Fiscal Year Ended December 26, 2015       
Integration costs (6)$360
 $410
 $617
 $487
Management realignment charges (7)
 2,174
 
 1,222
Accounts receivable bad debt reserve charge (8)
 1,370
 
 
Reinvention strategy costs (3)
 
 1,026
 1,697
Super Supplements conversion costs (1)
 
 
 1,766
Product write-off (9)
 
 
 1,330
Canada stores closing costs (2)
 
 
 885
 Fiscal Quarter Ended
 March June September December
Fiscal Year Ended December 30, 2017       
Goodwill impairments (a)$
 $164,325
 $46,308
 $
Tradename impairment (b)
 
 59,405
 
Nutri-Force restructuring costs (c)671
 13,655
 1,676
 (3,694)
Store impairment charges (d)
 3,765
 287
 786
Distribution center closing costs (e)
 
 2,257
 846
Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 2016       
Super Supplements conversion costs (f)$1,046
 $
 $
 $
Canada stores closing costs (g)931
 1,864
 (906) 
Reinvention strategy costs (h)541
 
 
 
Store impairment charges (d)218
 
 197
 382
Cost reduction project (i)
 1,492
 2,269
 
Goodwill impairment (j)
 
 
 32,636
Customer relationships intangible asset impairment (k)
 
 
 6,594
Table of Contents

 
(1)(a)In Fiscal 2016,Impairment charges on the goodwill of the retail segment.
(b)Impairment charge on the Vitamin Shoppe tradename.
(c)The costs represent restructuring costs in the manufacturing segment. See Note 10., Restructuring Costs for additional information.
(d)Impairment charges on the fixed assets of retail locations.
(e)The costs represent restructuring costs in the retail segment. See Note 10., Restructuring Costs for additional information.
(f)Costs primarily related to the closure of the Seattle distribution center. In Fiscal 2015, conversion costs primarily include inventory reserve charges, product markdowns and accelerated depreciation.
(2)(g)In Fiscal 2016, chargesCosts primarily related toinclude lease terminations.termination charges. The credit induring the fiscal quarterthree months ended September 24, 2016 relates to a reversal of lease liabilities previously accrued. In Fiscal 2015, costs include inventory reserve charges, impairment charges to fixed assets and severance charges.
(3)(h)The costs represent outside consultants fees in connection with the Company’s “reinvention strategy”Company's "reinvention strategy".
(4)(i)Outside consulting costs relating to a project to identify and implement cost reduction opportunities.
Table of Contents

(5)(j)Impairment chargescharge on the goodwill of $32.6 million on goodwill and $6.6 millionNutri-Force.
(k)Impairment charge on the customer relationships intangible asset of Nutri-Force.
(6)Represents integration costs related to the acquisition of Nutri-Force, consisting primarily of professional fees.
(7)Management realignment charges primarily consist of severance, sign-on bonuses, recruiting and relocation costs.
(8)Represents a charge to increase the allowance for doubtful accounts for Nutri-Force, related to one wholesale customer that abruptly ceased operations.
(9)
Represents a charge to inventory reserves for the write-off of USPlabs® products which the Company ceased selling.


85