UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K
   
þ Annual Report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the fiscal year ended August 30, 2008,28, 2010, or
   
o Transition report pursuant to section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
For the transition period from                    to                    .
Commission file number 1-10714
AUTOZONE, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
   
Nevada 62-1482048
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
incorporation or organization)  
123 South Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee38103
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
123 South Front Street, Memphis, Tennessee 38103
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(901) 495-6500
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
   

Title of each class
 Name of each exchange
Title of each classOn
on which registered
Common Stock
($.01 par value)
 New York Stock Exchange
($.01 par value)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yeso Noþ
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yesþ Noo
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.þo
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
       
Large accelerated filerþ Accelerated filero Non-accelerated filero Smaller reporting companyo
    (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act) Yeso Noþ
The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter was $7,251,818,438.$7,831,536,378.
The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of October 20, 2008,18, 2010, was 57,974,097.44,625,787.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Portions of the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, pursuant to Regulation 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be held December 17, 2008,15, 2010, are incorporated by reference into Part III.
 
 

 


 

TABLE OF CONTENTS
     
  4 
     
  4 
     
  4 
     
  5 
     
  6 
     
  6 
     
  7 
     
  8 
     
  8 
     
  8 
     
  8 
     
  8 
     
  9 
     
  10 
     
  1314 
     
  1314 
     
  1415 
     
  1415 
     
  1516 
     
  1516 
     
  1718 
     
  19 
     
  30 
     
  32 
     
  5962 
     
  5962 
     
  5962 
     
  6063 
     
  6063 
     
  6063 
     
  6063 
     
  6063 
     
  6063 
     
  6164 
     
  6164 
     
 Exhibit 12.1
 Exhibit 21.1
 Exhibit 23.1
 Exhibit 31.1
 Exhibit 31.2
 Exhibit 32.1
 Exhibit 32.2
EX-101 INSTANCE DOCUMENT
EX-101 SCHEMA DOCUMENT
EX-101 CALCULATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 LABELS LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 PRESENTATION LINKBASE DOCUMENT
EX-101 DEFINITION LINKBASE DOCUMENT

 

2


Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements typically use words such as “believe,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “plan,” “will,” “expect,” “estimate,” “project,” “positioned,” “strategy”“strategy,” and similar expressions. These statements are based on assumptions and assessments made by our management in light of experience and perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors that we believe to be appropriate. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties, including without limitation,limitation: credit market conditions; the impact of recessionary conditions; competition; product demand; the economy; credit markets; the ability to hire and retain qualified employees; consumer debt levels; inflation; weather; raw material costs of our suppliers; energy prices; war and the prospect of war, including terrorist activity; availability of consumer transportation; construction delays; access to available and feasible financing; and changes in laws or regulations. Certain of these risks are discussed in more detail in the “Risk Factors” section contained in Item IA under Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended August 28, 2010, and these Risk Factors should be read carefully. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and actual results,results; developments and business decisions may differ from those contemplated by such forward-looking statements, and such events described above and in the “Risk Factors” could materially and adversely affect our business. Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date made. Except as required by applicable law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Actual results may materially differ from anticipated results. Please refer to the Risk Factors section contained in Item 1 under Part I of this Form 10-K for more details.

 

3


PART I
Item 1. Business
Introduction
We areAutoZone, Inc. (“AutoZone”, the “Company” or “we”) is the nation’s leading specialty retailer and a leading distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories. We began operations in 1979 and at August 30, 200828, 2010 operated 4,0924,389 stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, and 148238 in Mexico. Each of our stores carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. In manyAt August 28, 2010, in 2,424 of our domestic stores and 173 of our Mexico stores, we also have a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and government agencies.public sector accounts. We also sell the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software. On the web,software through www.alldata.com. Additionally, we sell diagnostic and repair information and automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products through www.autozone.com.www.autozone.com, and as part of our commercial sales program, through www.autozonepro.com. We do not derive revenue from automotive repair or installation services.
At August 28, 2010, our stores were in the following locations:
     
At August 30, 2008, our stores were in the following locations: Store Count 
Alabama  9099 
Arizona  116120 
Arkansas  59 
California  438463 
Colorado  5866 
Connecticut  3235 
Delaware  1012 
Florida  185217 
Georgia  171175 
Idaho  1819 
Illinois  197214 
Indiana  131141 
Iowa  2223 
Kansas  38 
Kentucky  7580 
Louisiana  105109 
Maine  6 
Maryland  3844 
Massachusetts  6670 
Michigan  140149 
Minnesota  2327 
Mississippi  8485 
Missouri  95100 
Montana  1 
Nebraska  14 
Nevada  4850 
New Hampshire  1617 
New Jersey  5868 
New Mexico  5761 
New York  114123 
North Carolina  157172 
North Dakota  1 
Ohio  211229 
Oklahoma  6667 
Oregon  2728 
Pennsylvania  107114 
Puerto Rico  1725 
Rhode Island  15 
South Carolina  73
South Dakota277 

 

4


     
At August 30, 2008, our stores were in the following locations: Store Count 
South Dakota2 
Tennessee  150153 
Texas  512540 
Utah  3439 
Vermont  1 
Virginia  8295 
Washington  4862 
Washington, DC  6 
West Virginia  23 
Wisconsin  50 
Wyoming  5 
    
Domestic Total  4,0924,389 
Mexico  148238 
    
TOTALTotal  4,2404,627 
    
Marketing and Merchandising Strategy
We are dedicated to providing customers with superior service value and quality automotive parts and products at a great value in conveniently located, well-designed stores. Key elements of this strategy are:
Customer Service
Customer service is the most important element in our marketing and merchandising strategy, which is based upon consumer marketing research. We emphasize that our AutoZoners (employees) should always put customers first by providing prompt, courteous service and trustworthy advice. Our electronic parts catalog assists in the selection of parts;parts, and warranties that are offered by us or our vendors on many of the parts that we sell. OurThe wide area network in our stores helps us to expedite credit or debit card and check approval processes, to locate parts at neighboring AutoZone stores, and in some cases, to place special orders directly with our vendors.
Our stores generally open at 7:30 or 8 a.m. and close between 8 and 10 p.m. Monday through Saturday and typically open at 9 a.m. and close between 6 and 9 p.m. on Sunday. However, some stores are open 24 hours, and some have extended hours of 6 or 7 a.m. until midnight seven days a week.
We also provide specialty tools through our Loan-A-Tool® program. Customers can borrow a specialty tool, such as a steering wheel puller, for which a DIYdo-it-yourself (“DIY”) customer or a repair shop would have little or no use other than for a single job. AutoZoners also provide other free services, including check engine light readings;readings where allowed by law, battery charging;charging, the collection of DIY used oil recycling;for recycling, and the testing of starters, alternators, batteries, sensors and actuators.
Merchandising
The following table showstables show some of the types of products that we sell:sell by major category of items:
     
Hard PartsFailure Maintenance Items Accessories and Non-AutomotiveDiscretionary
A/C Compressors
Alternators
Batteries & Accessories
Brake Drums, Rotors, Shoes & Pads
Carburetors
Clutches
CV Axles
Engines
Fuel Pumps
Mufflers
Shock Absorbers & Struts
Starters
Water Pumps
 Antifreeze & Windshield Washer Fluid
Air Fresheners
Batteries & AccessoriesBrake Drums, Rotors, Shoes & PadsCell Phone Accessories
Belts & Hoses
Chemicals, including Brake & Power
Drinks & Snacks
CarburetorsSteering Fluid, Oil & Fuel Additives
Fuses
Lighting
Floor Mats & Seat Covers
ChassisOil & Transmission Fluid
Mirrors
ClutchesOil, Air, Fuel & Transmission Filters
Performance Products
CV AxlesOxygen Sensors
Protectants & Cleaners
EnginesPaint & AccessoriesSeat Covers
Fuel PumpsRefrigerant & Accessories
Sealants & Adhesives
FusesShock Absorbers & StrutsSteering Wheel Covers
IgnitionSpark Plugs & Wires
Wash
Stereos & Wax
Radios
LightingWindshield Wipers Air Fresheners
Cell Phone Accessories
DrinksTools
MufflersWash & Snacks
Floor Mats
Hand Cleaner
Neon Lighting
Mirrors
PaintWax
Starters & Accessories
Performance Products
Seat Covers
Steering Wheel Covers
Stereos
ToolsAlternators
Water Pumps
Radiators
Thermostats

 

5


We believe that the satisfaction of DIY customers and professional technicians is often impacted by our ability to provide specific automotive products as requested. Each store carries the same basic product lines, but we tailor our parts inventory to the makes and models of the vehicles in each store’s trade area. Our hub stores carry a larger assortment of products that can be delivered to commercial customers or to local satellite stores.
We are constantly updating the products that we offer to assureensure that our inventory matches the products that our customers demand.
Pricing
We want to be perceived by our customers as the value leader in our industry, by consistently providing quality merchandise at the right price, backed by a goodsatisfactory warranty and outstanding customer service. On many of our products we offer multiple value choices in a good/better/best assortment, with appropriate price and quality differences from the “good” products to the “better” and “best” products. A key differentiating component versus our competitors is our exclusive line of in-house brands:brands, which includes Valucraft, AutoZone, Duralast and Duralast Gold.Gold brands. We believe that our overall prices and value comparecompares favorably to thosethat of our competitors.
Marketing:Brand: Advertising and Promotions
We believe that targeted advertising and promotions play important roles in succeeding in today’s environment. We are constantly working to understand our customers’ wants and needs so that we can build long-lasting, loyal relationships. We utilize promotions, advertising, and advertisingloyalty card programs primarily to advise customers about the overall importance of vehicle maintenance, our great value and the availability of high quality parts. Broadcasting isBroadcast and internet media are our primary marketing methodadvertising methods of driving traffic to our stores. We utilize in-store signage, creative product placement and promotions to help educate customers about products that they need.
Store Design and Visual Merchandising
We design and build stores for a high visual impact. The typical AutoZone store utilizes colorful exterior and interior signage, exposed beams and ductwork and brightly lighted interiors. Maintenance products, accessories and miscellaneousnon-automotive items are attractively displayed for easy browsing by customers. In-store signage and special displays promote products on floor displays, end caps and on the shelf.shelves.
Commercial
Our commercial sales program operates in a highly fragmented market, and iswe are one of the leading distributors of automotive parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and government agenciespublic sector accounts in the United States, Puerto Rico and Mexico. As a part of the program, we offer credit and delivery to our commercial customers.customers, as well as direct commercial sales through www.autozonepro.com. The program operated out of 2,2362,424 domestic stores and 173 of our Mexico stores as of August 30, 2008.28, 2010. Through our hub stores, we offer a greater range of parts and products desired by professional technicians, andtechnicians; this additional inventory is available for our DIY customers as well. We have dedicated sales teams focused on national, regional and public sector commercial accounts.
Store Operations
Store Formats
Substantially all AutoZone stores are based on standard store formats, resulting in generally consistent appearance, merchandising and product mix. Approximately 85% to 90% of each store’s square footage is selling space, of which approximately 40% to 45% is dedicated to hard parts inventory. The hard parts inventory area is generally fronted by counters or pods that run the depth or length of the store, dividing the hard parts area from the remainder of the store. The remaining selling space contains displays of maintenance, accessories and non-automotive items.
We believe that our stores are “destination stores,” generating their own traffic rather than relying on traffic created by adjacent stores. Therefore, we situate most stores on major thoroughfares with easy access and good parking.

 

6


Store Personnel and Training
Each store typically employs from 10 to 16 AutoZoners, including a manager and, in some cases, an assistant manager. AutoZoners typically have prior automotive experience. All AutoZoners are encouraged to complete coursestests resulting in certificationcertifications by the National Institute for Automotive Service Excellence (“ASE”), which is broadly recognized for training certification in the automotive industry. Although we do on-the-job training, we also provide formal training programs, including an annual national sales meeting, regular store meetings on specific sales and product issues, standardized training manuals and a specialist program that provides training to AutoZoners in several areas of technical expertise from both the Company, our vendors and from independent certification agencies. Training is supplemented with frequent store visits by management.
Store managers, sales representatives and commercial specialists receive financial incentives through performance-based bonuses. In addition, our growth has provided opportunities for the promotion of qualified AutoZoners. We believe these opportunities are important to attract, motivate and retain high quality AutoZoners.
All store support functions are centralized in our store support centers located in Memphis, Tennessee, Monterrey, Mexico and Chihuahua, Mexico. We believe that this centralization enhances consistent execution of our merchandising and marketing strategies at the store level, while reducing expenses and cost of sales.
Store Automation
All of our stores have Z-net,®, our proprietary electronic catalog that enables our AutoZoners to efficiently look up the parts that our customers need and providesto provide complete job solutions, advice and information for customer vehicles. Z-net® provides parts information based on the year, make, model and engine type of a vehicle and also tracks inventory availability at the store, at other nearby stores and through special order. The Z-net® display screens are placed on the hard parts counter or pods, where both AutoZonersthe AutoZoner and customerscustomer can view the screen. In addition, our wide area network enables the stores to expedite credit or debit card and check approval processes, to access immediately national warranty data, to implement real-time inventory controls and to locate and hold parts at neighboring AutoZone stores.
Our stores utilize our computerized proprietary Store Management System, which includes bar code scanning and point-of-sale data collection terminals. The Store Management System provides administrative assistance and improved personnel scheduling at the store level, as well as enhanced merchandising information and improved inventory control. We believe the Store Management System also enhances customer service through faster processing of transactions and simplified warranty and product return procedures.
Store Development
The following table reflects store development during the past five fiscal years:
                     
  Fiscal Year 
  2008  2007  2006  2005  2004 
                     
Beginning Domestic Stores  3,933   3,771   3,592   3,420   3,219 
New Stores  160   163   185   175   202 
Closed Stores  1   1   6   3   1 
                
Net New Stores  159   162   179   172   201 
                
Relocated Stores  14   18   18   7   4 
Ending Domestic Stores  4,092   3,933   3,771   3,592   3,420 
Ending Mexico Stores  148   123   100   81   63 
                
Ending Total Stores  4,240   4,056   3,871   3,673   3,483 
                
                     
  Fiscal Year 
  2010  2009  2008  2007  2006 
Beginning stores  4,417   4,240   4,056   3,871   3,673 
New stores  213   180   185   186   204 
Closed stores  3   3   1   1   6 
                
Net new stores  210   177   184   185   198 
                
Relocated stores  3   9   14   18   18 
                
Ending stores  4,627   4,417   4,240   4,056   3,871 
                
The domestic stores include stores in the United States and Puerto Rico. We believe that expansion opportunities exist both in markets that we do not currently serve, as well as in markets where we can achieve a larger presence. We attempt to obtain high visibility sites in high traffic locations and undertake substantial research prior to entering new markets. The most important criteria for opening a new store are its projected future profitability and its ability to achieve our required investment hurdle rate. Key factors in selecting new site and market locations include population, demographics, vehicle profile, customer buying trends, commercial businesses, number and strength of competitors’ stores and the cost of real estate. In reviewing the vehicle profile, we also consider the number of vehicles that are seven years old and older, “our kind of vehicles,”vehicles”; as these are generally no longer under the original manufacturers’ warranties and require more maintenance and repair than younger vehicles. We generally seek to open new stores within or contiguous to existing market areas and attempt to cluster development in markets in a relatively short period of time. In addition to continuing to lease or develop our own stores, we evaluate and may make strategic acquisitions.

 

7


Purchasing and Supply Chain
Merchandise is selected and purchased for all stores through our store support centers located in Memphis, Tennessee and Monterrey, Mexico. No oneIn fiscal 2010, no class of product accountssimilar products accounted for as much as10 percent or more of our total sales. Also, during fiscal 2010, one vendor supplied 10 percent of our total sales. In fiscal 2008,purchases; no single supplier accounted forother individual vendor provided more than 10 percent of our total purchases. We generally have few long-term contracts for the purchase of merchandise. We believe that we have good relationships with our suppliers. We also believe that alternative sources of supply exist, at similar cost, for most types of product sold. Most of our merchandise flows through our distribution centers to our stores by our fleet of tractors and trailers or by third-party trucking firms.
Our hub stores have increased our ability to distribute products on a timely basis to many of our stores.stores and to expand our product assortment. A hub store is able to provide replenishmentgenerally has a larger assortment of products sold and deliver other products maintained only in hub store inventoriesas well as regular replenishment items that can be delivered to a store in its coverage area generally within 24 hours. Additionally, hub stores can provide replenishment of products sold to stores within its network. Hub stores are generally replenished from distribution centers multiple times per week.
Competition
The sale of automotive parts, accessories and maintenance items is highly competitive in many areas, including name recognition, product availability, customer service, store location and price. AutoZone competes in both the retail (“DIY”)DIY and commercial do-it-for-me (“DIFM”) auto parts and accessories markets.products.
Competitors include national, regional and regionallocal auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, wholesalers andon-line parts stores, jobbers, repair shops, car washes and auto dealers, in addition to discount and mass merchandise stores, department stores, hardware stores, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores and home stores that sell aftermarket vehicle parts and supplies, chemicals, accessories, tools and maintenance parts. AutoZone competes on the basis of customer service, including the trustworthy advice of our AutoZoners,AutoZoners; merchandise quality, selection and availability, price,availability; price; product warranty,warranty; store layouts, location and location.convenience; and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks.
Trademarks and Patents
We have registered several service marks and trademarks in the United States Patent and Trademark office as well as in certain other countries, including our service marks, “AutoZone” and “Get in the Zone,” and trademarks, “AutoZone,” “Duralast,” “Duralast Gold,” “Valucraft,” “ALLDATA”“ALLDATA,” “Loan-A-Tool” and “Z-net®.“Z-net.” We believe that these service marks and trademarks are important components of our marketing and merchandising and marketing strategy.strategies.
Employees
As of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, we employed approximately 57,000over 63,000 persons, approximately 5756 percent of whom were employed full-time. About 91 percent of our AutoZoners were employed in stores or in direct field supervision, approximately 65 percent in distribution centers and approximately 34 percent in store support and other functions. Included in the above numbers are approximately 2,6003,000 persons employed in our Mexico operations.
We have never experienced any material labor disruption and believe that relations with our AutoZoners are generally good.
AutoZone Website
AutoZone’s primary website is at http://www.autozone.com. We make available, free of charge, at our investor relations website, http://www.autozoneinc.com, our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as soon as reasonably feasible after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission.

 

8


Executive Officers of the Registrant
The following list describes our executive officers. The title of each executive officer includes the words “Customer Satisfaction” which reflects our commitment to customer service. Officers are elected by and serve at the discretion of the Board of Directors.
William C. Rhodes, III, 4345Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, Customer Satisfaction
William C. Rhodes, III, was named Chairman of AutoZone in Juneduring fiscal 2007 and has been President, Chief Executive Officer and a director since March 2005. Prior to his appointment as President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Rhodes was Executive Vice President-StorePresident — Store Operations and Commercial. Prior to fiscal 2005, he had been Senior Vice President-Supply Chain and Information Technology since fiscal 2002, and prior thereto had been Senior Vice President-Supply Chain since 2001. Prior to that time,Previously, he served in various capacities within the Company, including Vice President-Stores in 2000, Senior Vice President-FinancePresident — Supply Chain and Information Technology, Senior Vice President — Supply Chain, Vice President — Stores, Senior Vice President — Finance and Vice President-Finance in 1999President — Finance and Vice President-OperationsPresident — Operations Analysis and Support from 1997 to 1999.Support. Prior to 1994, Mr. Rhodes was a manager with Ernst & Young LLP. Mr. Rhodes is currently a member of the Board of Directors for Dollar General Corporation.
William T. Giles, 4951Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President, Finance, Information Technology and Store
Development, Customer Satisfaction
William T. Giles was elected Executive Vice President — Finance, Information Technology and Store Development, in MarchCustomer Satisfaction
William T. Giles was elected Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice President — Finance, Information Technology and Store Development during fiscal 2007. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer from June 2006 to December 2006 and Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer since May 2006. From 1991 to May 2006, he held several positions with Linens N’ Things, Inc., most recently as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to 1991, he was with Melville, Inc. and PricewaterhouseCoopers.
Harry L. Goldsmith, 57—59—Executive Vice President, Secretary and General Counsel, Customer Satisfaction
Harry L. Goldsmith was elected Executive Vice-President,Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary during fiscal 2006. Previously, he was Senior Vice President, SecretaryGeneral Counsel and General CounselSecretary since 1996 and was Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from 1993 to 1996.
Robert D. Olsen, 55—Executive Vice President- Store Operations, Commercial and Mexico, Customer Satisfaction
Robert D. Olsen was elected Executive Vice President-Store Operations, Commercial and Mexico during fiscal 2007. Prior to that, he was Executive Vice President-Supply Chain, Information Technology, Mexico and Store Development since fiscal 2006. Previously, he was Senior Vice President since fiscal 2000 with primary responsibility for store development and Mexico operations. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Olsen was James A. Shea, 65—Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Leslie’s Poolmart. From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Olsen held several positions with AutoZone, including Controller, Vice President-Finance, and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer.
James A. Shea, 63—Executive Vice President-Merchandising,— Merchandising, Marketing and Supply Chain, Customer Satisfaction
James A. Shea was elected Executive Vice President-Merchandising, Marketing and Supply Chain during fiscal 2007 and has served as Executive Vice President-MerchandisingPresident — Merchandising and Marketing since fiscal 2005. He was President and Co-founder of Portero during 2004. Prior to 2004, he was Chief Executive Officer of Party City from 1999 to 2003. From 1995 to 1999, he was with Lechters Housewares where he was Senior Vice President, Marketing and Merchandising before being named President in 1997. From 1990 to 1995, he was Senior Vice President of Home for Kaufmanns Department Store, a division of May Company. Mr. Shea announced his plans to retire, effective at the end of October 2010.
Jon A. Bascom,5153Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident and Chief Information Officer, Customer Satisfaction
Jon A. Bascom was elected Senior Vice President-ChiefPresident and Chief Information Officer in December 2007.during fiscal 2008. Previously, he was Vice President-InformationPresident — Information Technology since 1996. Prior to joining AutoZone, Mr. Bascom worked for Malone & Hyde, the AutoZone predecessor company, for 9 years. Since 1989, Mr. Bascom has worked in a variety of leadership roles in applications development, infrastructure, and technology support. Prior to joining AutoZone, Mr. Bascom worked for Malone & Hyde, AutoZone’s predecessor company, for 9 years.

9


Timothy W. Briggs, 4749Senior Vice President-HumanPresident — Human Resources, Customer Satisfaction
Timothy W. Briggs was elected Senior Vice President-HumanPresident — Human Resources in October 2005.during fiscal 2006. Prior to that, he was Vice President — Field Human Resources since March 2005. From 2002 to 2005, Mr. Briggs was Vice President — Organization Development. From 1996 to 2002, Mr. Briggs served in various management capacities at the Limited Inc., including Vice President, Human Resources.
Mark A. Finestone,4749Senior Vice President-Merchandising,President — Merchandising, Customer Satisfaction
Mark A. Finestone was elected Senior Vice President-Merchandising in December 2007.President — Merchandising during fiscal 2008. Previously, he was Vice President — Merchandising since 2002. Prior to joining AutoZone in 2002, Mr. Finestone worked for May Department Stores for 19 years where he held a variety of leadership roles which included Divisional Vice President, Merchandising.

9


William W. Graves,4850Senior Vice President-SupplyPresident — Supply Chain, Customer Satisfaction
William W. Graves was elected Senior Vice President-SupplyPresident — Supply Chain in October 2005.during fiscal 2006. Prior thereto, he was Vice President-SupplyPresident — Supply Chain since 2000. From 1992 to 2000, Mr. Graves served in various capacities with the Company.
Lisa R. Kranc, 55—57—Senior Vice President-Marketing,President — Marketing, Customer Satisfaction
Lisa R. Kranc was elected Senior Vice President-Marketing during fiscal 2001. Previously, she was Vice President-Marketing for Hannaford Bros. Co., a Maine-based grocery chain, since 1997, and was Senior Vice President-Marketing for Bruno’s, Inc., from 1996 to 1997. Prior to 1996, she was Vice President-Marketing for Giant Eagle, Inc. since 1992.
Thomas B. Newbern, 46—48—Senior Vice President-StorePresident — Store Operations, Customer Satisfaction
Thomas B. Newbern was elected Senior Vice President-Store Operations in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Previously, Mr. Newbern held the title Vice President — Store Operations for AutoZone since 1998. A twenty-one year25-year AutoZoner, he has held several key management positions with the Company.
Charlie Pleas, III, 43—45—Senior Vice President and Controller, Customer Satisfaction
Charlie Pleas, III, was elected Senior Vice President and Controller in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Prior to that, he was Vice President and Controller since 2003. Previously, he was Vice President-AccountingPresident - Accounting since 2000, and Director of General Accounting since 1996. Prior to joining AutoZone, Mr. Pleas was a Division Controller with Fleming Companies, Inc. where he served in various capacities from 1988.
Larry M. Roesel, 51—53—Senior Vice President-Commercial,President — Commercial, Customer Satisfaction
Larry M. Roesel joined AutoZone as Senior Vice President-Commercial in Marchduring fiscal 2007. Mr. Roesel came to AutoZone with more than thirty years of experience with OfficeMax, Inc. and its predecessor, where he served in operations, sales and general management.
Robert D. Olsen, 57—Corporate Development Officer, Customer Satisfaction
Robert D. Olsen was elected Corporate Development Officer as of November 1, 2009, with primary responsibility for Mexico, ALLDATA, and other strategic initiatives. Previously, he was Executive Vice President — Store Operations, Commercial, ALLDATA, and Mexico since fiscal 2007. Prior to that time, he was Executive Vice President — Supply Chain, Information Technology, Mexico and Store Development since fiscal 2006 and before that, Senior Vice President since fiscal 2000 with primary responsibility for store development and Mexico operations. From 1993 to 2000, Mr. Olsen was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Leslie’s Poolmart. From 1985 to 1989, Mr. Olsen held several positions with AutoZone, including Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and Vice President — Finance and Controller.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
Our business is subject to a variety of risks. Set forth below are certain of the important risks that we face and that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results. These risks are not the only ones we face. Our business could also be affected by additional factors that are presently unknown to us or that we currently believe to be immaterial to our business.
We may not be able to sustain our recent rate of sales growth.
We have increased our store count in the past five fiscal years, growing from 3,268 stores at August 30, 2003, to 4,240 stores at August 30, 2008, an average store count increase per year of 5%. Additionally, we have increased annual revenues in the past five fiscal years from $5.457 billion in fiscal 2003 to $6.523 billion in fiscal 2008, an average increase per year of 4%. Annual revenue growth is driven by the opening of new stores and same-store sales. We cannot provide any assurance that we can continue to open stores or increase same-store sales.

10


Our business depends upon qualified employees.
At the end of fiscal 2008, our consolidated employee count was approximately 57,000. We cannot assure that we can continue to hire and retain qualified employees at current wage rates. If we do not maintain competitive wages, our customer service could suffer by reason of a declining quality of our workforce or, alternatively, our earnings could decrease if we increase our wage rates.
If demand for our products slows, then our business may be materially affected.
Demand for products sold by our stores depends on many factors, including:
the number of miles vehicles are driven annually. Higher vehicle mileage increases the need for maintenance and repair. Mileage levels may be affected by gas prices and other factors.
the number of vehicles in current service that are seven years old and older. These vehicles are generally no longer under the original vehicle manufacturers’ warranties and tend to need more maintenance and repair than younger vehicles.
technological advances. Advances in automotive technology and parts design could result in cars needing maintenance less frequently and parts lasting longer.
the weather. Inclement weather may cause vehicle maintenance to be deferred.

10


the economy. In the short term, itperiods of rapidly declining economic conditions, both retail DIY and commercial DIFM customers may depend upon:defer vehicle maintenance or repair. Additionally, such conditions may affect our customers’ credit availability. During periods of expansionary economic conditions, more of our DIY customers may pay others to repair and maintain their cars instead of working on their own vehicles or they may purchase new vehicles.
the number of miles vehicles are driven annually. Higher vehicle mileage increases the need for maintenance and repair. Mileage levels may be affected by gas prices and other factors.
the number of vehicles in current service that are seven years old and older. These vehicles are generally no longer under the original vehicle manufacturers’ warranties and tend to need more maintenance and repair than younger vehicles.
the weather. Inclement weather may cause vehicle maintenance to be deferred.
the economy. In periods of rapidly declining economic conditions, both retail DIY and commercial do-it-for-me (“DIFM”) customers may defer vehicle maintenance or repair. Additionally, such conditions may affect our customers’ credit availability. During periods of expansionary economic conditions, more of our DIY customers may pay others to repair and maintain their cars instead of working on their own vehicles or they may purchase new vehicles.
rising energy prices. Increases in energy prices may cause our customers to defer purchases of certain of our products as they use a higher percentage of their income to pay for gasoline and other energy costs.
rising energy prices. Increases in energy prices may cause our customers to defer purchases of certain of our products as they use a higher percentage of their income to pay for gasoline and other energy costs.
For the long term, demand for our products may depend upon:be affected by:
the quality of the vehicles manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers and the length of the warranties or maintenance offered on new vehicles; and
restrictions on access to diagnostic tools and repair information imposed by the original vehicle manufacturers or by governmental regulation.
the quality of the vehicles manufactured by the original vehicle manufacturers and the length of the warranties or maintenance offered on new vehicles; and
restrictions on access to diagnostic tools and repair information imposed by the original vehicle manufacturers or by governmental regulation.
All of these factors could result in immediate and longer term declines in the demand for our products, which could adversely affect our sales, cash flows and overall financial condition.
If we are unable to compete successfully against other businesses that sell the products that we sell, we could lose customers and our sales and profits may decline.
The sale of automotive parts, accessories and maintenance items is highly competitive and is based on many factors, including name recognition, product availability, customer service, store location and price. Competitors are rapidly opening locations near our existing stores. AutoZone competes as a supplierprovider in both the DIY and DIFM auto parts and accessories markets.
Competitors include national, regional and local auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, on-line parts stores, jobbers, repair shops, car washes and auto dealers, in addition to discount and mass merchandise stores, department stores, hardware stores, supermarkets, drugstores, convenience stores and home stores that sell aftermarket vehicle parts and supplies, chemicals, accessories, tools and maintenance parts. Although we believe we compete effectively on the basis of customer service, including the knowledge and expertise of our AutoZoners; merchandise quality, selection and availability; product warranty; store layout, location and convenience; price; and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks; some competitors may havegain competitive advantages, such as greater financial and marketing resources allowing them to sell automotive products at lower prices, larger stores with more merchandise, longer operating histories, more frequent customer visits and more effective advertising. If we are unable to continue to develop successful competitive strategies, or if our competitors develop more effective strategies, we could lose customers and our sales and profits may decline.
We may not be able to sustain our recent rate of sales growth.
We have increased our store count in the past five fiscal years, growing from 3,673 stores at August 27, 2005, to 4,627 stores at August 28, 2010, an average store count increase per year of 5%. Additionally, we have increased annual revenues in the past five fiscal years from $5.711 billion in fiscal 2005 to $7.363 billion in fiscal 2010, an average increase per year of 6%. Annual revenue growth is driven by the opening of new stores and increases in same-store sales. We open new stores only after evaluating customer buying trends and market demand/needs, all of which could be adversely affected by continued job losses, wage cuts, small business failures and microeconomic conditions unique to the automotive industry. Same store sales are impacted both by customer demand levels and by the prices we are able to charge for our products, which can also be negatively impacted by continued recessionary pressures. We cannot provide any assurance that we will continue to open stores at historical rates or achieve increases in same-store sales.

 

11


If we cannot profitably increase our market share in the commercial auto parts business, our sales growth may be limited.
Although we are one of the largest sellers of auto parts in the commercial market, to increase commercial sales we must compete against national and regional auto parts chains, independently owned parts stores, wholesalers and jobbers repair shops and auto dealers. Although we believe we compete effectively on the basis of customer service, merchandise quality, selection and availability, price, product warranty, and distribution locations, and the strength of our AutoZone brand name, trademarks and service marks, some automotive aftermarket jobbers have been in business for substantially longer periods of time than we have, have developed long-term customer relationships and have large available inventories. We can make no assurances thatIf we canare unable to profitably develop new commercial customers, or make available inventories required by commercial customers.
If our vendors continue to consolidate, we may pay higher prices for our merchandise.
In recent years, several of our vendors have merged. Further vendor consolidation could limit the number of vendors from which we may purchase products and could materially affect the prices we pay for these products.
Consolidation among our competitors may negatively impact our business.
Recently some of our competitors have merged. If this trend continues or they are able to achieve efficiencies in their mergers, theresales growth may be greater competitive pressures in the markets in which they are stronger.limited.
War or acts of terrorism or the threat of either may negatively impact availability of merchandise and adversely impact our sales.
War or acts of terrorism, or the threat of either, may have a negative impact on our ability to obtain merchandise available for sale in our stores. Some of our merchandise is imported from other countries. If imported goods become difficult or impossible to bring into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be negatively affected.
In the event that commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our distribution centers and stores.
Rising energy prices may negatively impact our profitability.
As mentioned above, rising energy prices may impact demand for the products that we sell, overall transaction count and our profitability. Higher energy prices impact our merchandise distribution, commercial delivery, utility and product costs.
Demand for our merchandise may decline if vehicle manufacturers refuse to make available the information our customers need to work on their own vehicles.
Demand for our merchandise may decline if vehicle manufacturers refuse to make available to the automotive aftermarket industry diagnostic, repair and maintenance information that our customers, both retail (“DIY”) and commercial (“DIFM”), require to diagnose, repair and maintain their vehicles. Without public dissemination of this information, consumers may be forced to have all diagnostic work, repairs and maintenance performed by the vehicle manufacturers’ dealer network.

12


Deteriorating conditionsDeterioration in the global credit markets, changes in our credit ratings and macroeconomic factors could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our short-term and long-term debt is rated investment grade by the major rating agencies. These investment-grade credit ratings have historically allowed us to take advantage of lower interest rates and other favorable terms on our short-term credit lines, in our senior debt offerings and in the commercial paper markets. To maintain our investment-grade ratings, we are required to meet certain financial performance ratios. An increase in our debt and/or a decline in our earnings could result in downgrades in our credit ratings. A downgrade in our credit ratings could result in an increase in interest rates and more restrictive terms on certain of our senior debt and our commercial paper, could limit our access to public debt markets, could limit the institutions willing to provide credit facilities to us and could significantly increase the interest rates on such facilities from current levels.
Moreover, over the past several months, significant deterioration in the financial condition of large financial institutions hasin calendar years 2008 and 2009 resulted in a severe loss of liquidity and availability of credit in global credit markets and in higher short-term borrowing costs and more stringent borrowing terms. Recessionary conditionsDuring brief time intervals in the fourth quarter of calendar 2008 and the first quarter of calendar 2009, there was no liquidity in the commercial paper markets, resulting in an absence of commercial paper buyers and extraordinarily high interest rates on commercial paper. We can provide no assurance that credit market events such as those that occurred in the fourth quarter of 2008 and the first quarter of 2009 will not occur again in the foreseeable future. Conditions and events in the global economy threaten to cause further tightening of the credit markets, more stringent lending standards and terms and higher volatility in interest rates. Persistence of these conditionsmarket could have a material adverse effect on our access to short-term debt and the terms and cost of that debt.
Macroeconomic conditions also impact both our customers and our suppliers. Continued recessionary conditions could result in additional job losses and business failures, which could result in our loss of certain small business customers and curtailment of spending by our retail customers. In addition, further deteriorationcontinued distress in global credit markets, business failures and other recessionary conditions could have a material adverse effect on the U.S. economyability of our suppliers to obtain necessary short and long-term financing to meet our inventory demands. Moreover, rising energy prices could impact our merchandise distribution, commercial delivery, utility and product costs. All of these macroeconomic conditions could adversely affect our corporate results,sales growth, margins and overhead, which could adversely affect our financial condition and operations.
Our business depends upon hiring and retaining qualified employees.
We believe that much of our brand value lies in the quality of our over 63,000 AutoZoners employed in our stores, distribution centers, store support centers and ALLDATA. We cannot be assured that we can continue to hire and retain qualified employees at current wage rates. If we are unable to hire, properly train and/or retain qualified employees, we could experience higher employment costs, reduced sales, losses of customers and diminution of our brand, which could adversely affect our earnings. If we do not maintain competitive wages, our customer service could suffer due to a declining quality of our workforce or, alternatively, our earnings could decrease if we increase our wage rates.
Inability to acquire and provide quality merchandise could adversely affect our sales and results of operations.
We are dependent upon our vendors continuing to supply us with quality merchandise. If our merchandise offerings do not meet our customers’ expectations regarding quality and safety, we could experience lost sales, experience increased costs and be exposed to legal and reputational risk. All of our vendors must comply with applicable product safety laws, and we are dependent on them to ensure that the products we buy comply with all safety and quality standards. Events that give rise to actual, potential or perceived product safety concerns could expose us to government enforcement action or private litigation and result in costly product recalls and other liabilities. In addition, negative customer perceptions regarding the safety or quality of the products we sell could cause our customers to seek alternative sources for their needs, resulting in lost sales. In those circumstances, it may be difficult and costly for us to regain the confidence of our customers. Moreover, if any of our significant vendors experiences financial difficulties or otherwise is unable to deliver merchandise to us on a timely basis, or at all, we could have product shortages in our stores that could adversely affect customers’ perceptions of us and cause us to lose customers and sales.

12


Our largest stockholder, as a result of its voting ownership, may have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders.
As of October 18, 2010, ESL Investments, Inc. and certain of its affiliates (together, “ESL”) beneficially owned approximately 34.7% of our outstanding common stock. As a result, ESL may have the ability to exert substantial influence over actions to be taken or approved by our stockholders, including the election of directors and potential change of control transactions. In the future, ESL may acquire or sell shares of common stock and thereby increase or decrease its ownership stake in us. Significant fluctuations in their level of ownership could have an impact on our share price.
In June 2008, we entered into an agreement with ESL (the “ESL Agreement”), in which ESL has agreed to vote shares of our common stock owned by ESL in excess of 37.5% in the same proportion as all non-ESL-owned shares are voted. Additionally, under the terms of the ESL Agreement, the Company added two directors in August 2008 that were identified by ESL. William C. Crowley, one of the two directors identified by ESL, is the President and Chief Operating Officer of ESL Investments, Inc.
Consolidation among our competitors may negatively impact our business.
Recently some of our competitors have merged. Consolidation among our competitors could enhance their financial position, provide them with the ability to achieve better purchasing terms allowing them to provide more competitive prices to customers for whom we compete, and allow them to achieve efficiencies in their mergers that allow for more effective use of advertising and marketing dollars and allow them to more effectively compete for customers. These consolidated competitors could take sales volume away from us in certain markets and could cause us to change our pricing with a negative impact on our margins or could cause us to spend more money to maintain customers or seek new customers, all of which could negatively impact our business.
Our ability to grow depends in part on new store openings, existing store remodels and expansions and effective utilization of our existing supply chain and hub network.
Our continued growth and success will depend in part on our ability to open and operate new stores and expand and remodel existing stores to meet customers’ needs on a timely and profitable basis. Accomplishing our new and existing store expansion goals will depend upon a number of factors, including the ability to partner with developers and landlords to obtain suitable sites for new and expanded stores at acceptable costs, the hiring and training of qualified personnel, particularly at the store management level, and the integration of new stores into existing operations. There can be no assurance we will be able to achieve our store expansion goals, manage our growth effectively, successfully integrate the planned new stores into our operations or operate our new, remodeled and expanded stores profitably.
In addition, we extensively utilize hub stores, our supply chains and logistics management techniques to efficiently stock our stores. If we fail to effectively utilize our existing distribution hubs and/or supply chains, we could experience inappropriate inventory levels in our stores, which could adversely affect our sales volume and/or our margins.
Our failure to protect our reputation could have a material adverse effect on our brand name.
Our ability to maintain our reputation is critical to our brand name. Our reputation could be jeopardized if we fail to maintain high standards for merchandise safety, quality and integrity. Any negative publicity about these types of concerns may reduce demand for our merchandise. Failure to comply with ethical, social, product, labor and environmental standards, or related political considerations, could also jeopardize our reputation and potentially lead to various adverse consumer actions. Failure to comply with local laws and regulations, to maintain an effective system of internal controls or to provide accurate and timely financial statement information could also hurt our reputation. Damage to our reputation or loss of consumer confidence for any of these or other reasons could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition, as well as require additional resources to rebuild our reputation.

13


Business interruptions may negatively impact our store hours, operability of our computer and other systems, availability of merchandise and otherwise have a material negative effect on our sales and our business.
War or acts of terrorism, political unrest, hurricanes, windstorms, fires, earthquakes and other natural or other disasters or the threat of any of them, may result in certain of our stores being closed for a period of time or permanently or have a negative impact on our ability to obtain merchandise available for sale in our stores. Some of our merchandise is imported from other countries. If imported goods become difficult or impossible to bring into the United States, and if we cannot obtain such merchandise from other sources at similar costs, our sales and profit margins may be negatively affected.
In the event that commercial transportation is curtailed or substantially delayed, our business may be adversely impacted, as we may have difficulty shipping merchandise to our distribution centers and stores resulting in lost sales, canceled purchase orders and/or a potential loss of customer loyalty.
We rely extensively on our computer systems to manage inventory, process transactions and summarize results. Our systems are subject to damage or interruption from power outages, telecommunications failures, computer viruses, security breaches and catastrophic events. If our systems are damaged or fail to function properly, we may incur substantial costs to repair or replace them, and may experience loss of critical data and interruptions or delays in our ability to manage inventories or process transactions, which could result in lost sales, inability to process purchase orders and/or a potential loss of customer loyalty, which could adversely affect our results of operations.
Healthcare reform legislation could have a negative impact on our business.
The recently enacted Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (the “Patient Act”) as well as other healthcare reform legislation being considered by Congress and state legislatures may have an impact on our business. While we are currently evaluating the potential effects of the Patient Act on our business, the impact could be extensive and will most likely increase our employee healthcare-related costs. While the significant costs of the recent healthcare legislation enacted will occur after 2013 due to provisions of the legislation being phased in over time, changes to our healthcare costs structure could have a significant, negative impact on our business.
Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.None.
Item 2. Properties
The following table reflects the square footage and number of leased and owned properties for our stores as of August 30, 2008:28, 2010:
                
 No. of Stores Square Footage  No. of Stores Square Footage 
Leased
 2,027 12,482,799  2,319 14,540,910 
Owned
 2,213 14,808,621  2,308 15,486,198 
          
Total
 4,240 27,291,420  4,627 30,027,108 
          
We have approximately 4.0 million square feet in distribution centers servicing our stores, of which approximately 1.3 million square feet is leased and the remainder is owned. Our distribution centers are located in Arizona, California, Georgia, Illinois, Ohio, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Texas and Mexico. Our primary store support center which we own, is located in Memphis, Tennessee, and consists of approximately 260,000 square feet. We also have two additional store support centers located in Monterrey, Mexico and Chihuahua, Mexico and own andor lease other properties that are not material in the aggregate.

 

1314


Item 3. Legal Proceedings
AutoZone, Inc. isWe are a defendant in a lawsuit entitled “Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., et al., v. AutoZone, Inc. et al.,” filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2004. The case was filed by more than 200 plaintiffs, which are principally automotive aftermarket warehouse distributors and jobbers, (collectively “Plaintiffs”), against a number of defendants, including automotive aftermarket retailers and aftermarket automotive parts manufacturers. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs allege,inter alia, that some or all of the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants have knowingly received, in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (the “Act”), from various of the manufacturer defendants benefits such as volume discounts, rebates, early buy allowances and other allowances, fees, inventory without payment, sham advertising and promotional payments, a share in the manufacturers’ profits, benefits of pay on scan purchases, implementation of radio frequency identification technology, and excessive payments for services purportedly performed for the manufacturers. Additionally, a subset of plaintiffs alleges a claim of fraud against the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants based on discovery issues in a prior litigation involving similar Robinson-Patman Act claims.claims under the Act. In the prior litigation, the discovery dispute, as well as the underlying claims, werewas decided in favor of AutoZone and the other automotive aftermarket retailer defendants who proceeded to trial, pursuant to a unanimous jury verdict which was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In the current litigation, the plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages (including statutory trebling), attorneys’ fees, and a permanent injunction prohibiting the aftermarket retailer defendants from inducing and/or knowingly receiving discriminatory prices from any of the aftermarket manufacturer defendants and from opening up any further stores to compete with the plaintiffs as long as the defendants allegedly continue to violate the Act.
In an order dated September 7, 2010 and issued on September 16, 2010, the court granted motions to dismiss all claims against AutoZone and its co-defendant competitors and suppliers.  Based on the record in the prior litigation, the court dismissed with prejudice all overlapping claims – that is, those covering the same time periods covered by the prior litigation and brought by the judgment plaintiffs in the prior litigation. The Company believescourt also dismissed with prejudice the plaintiffs’ attempt to revisit discovery disputes from the prior litigation.  Further, with respect to the other claims under the Act, the court found that the factual statements contained in the complaint fall short of what would be necessary to support a plausible inference of unlawful price discrimination.  Finally, the court held that the AutoZone pay-on-scan program is a difference in non-price terms that are not governed by the Act.  The court ordered the case closed, but also stated that “in an abundance of caution the Court [was] defer[ring] decision on whether to grant leave to amend to allow plaintiff an opportunity to propose curative amendments.” Without moving for leave to amend their complaint for a third time, four plaintiffs filed a Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint (the “Third Amended Complaint”) on October 18, 2010. The Third Amended Complaint repeats and expands certain allegations from previous complaints, asserting two claims under the Act, but states that all other plaintiffs have withdrawn their claims, and that,inter alia, Chief Auto Parts, Inc. has been dismissed as a defendant.  The court set no specific procedure for further response or motion by the defendants.  We anticipate that the defendants, including AutoZone, will request that the court reject the Third Amended Complaint and/or will seek to have it dismissed.
We believe this suit to be without merit and isare vigorously defending against it. Defendants have filed motionsWe are unable to dismiss all claims with prejudice on substantive and procedural grounds. Additionally, the Defendants have sought to enjoin plaintiffs from filing similar lawsuits in the future. If granted in their entirety, these dispositive motions would resolve the litigation in Defendants’ favor.estimate a loss or possible range of loss.
AutoZone isWe are involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of our business. Although the amount of liability that may result from these other proceedings cannot be ascertained, we do not currently believe that, in the aggregate, they will result in liabilities material to our financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security HoldersReserved
Not applicable.

 

1415


PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
AutoZone’sOur common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “AZO.” On October 20, 2008,18, 2010, there were 3,5043,182 stockholders of record, which does not include the number of beneficial owners whose shares were represented by security position listings.
We currently do not pay a cash dividend on our common stock. Our ability to pay dividends is subject to limitations imposed by Nevada law. Any payment of dividends in the future would be dependent upon our financial condition, capital requirements, earnings, cash flow and other factors.
The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of common stock, as reported by the New York Stock Exchange, for the periods indicated:
                
 Price Range of Common Stock  Price Range of Common Stock 
 High Low  High Low 
Fiscal Year Ended August 30, 2008:       
Fiscal Year Ended August 28, 2010: 
Fourth quarter $142.49 $110.39  $215.21 $177.66 
Third quarter $126.85 $108.89  $187.94 $160.20 
Second quarter $132.44 $103.07  $161.33 $146.17 
First quarter $125.75 $107.10  $154.69 $135.13 
  
Fiscal Year Ended August 25, 2007: 
Fiscal Year Ended August 29, 2009: 
Fourth quarter $140.29 $111.46  $164.38 $141.00 
Third quarter $137.66 $121.52  $169.99 $129.21 
Second quarter $128.00 $112.39  $145.77 $92.52 
First quarter $114.98 $87.30  $143.80 $84.66 
During 1998, the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion of its outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The program was most recently amended in June 2008,on September 28, 2010, to increase the repurchase authorization to $6.4$9.4 billion from $5.9$8.9 billion. The program does not have an expiration date.
Shares of common stock repurchased by the Company during the quarter ended August 30, 2008,28, 2010, were as follows:
                 
          Total Number of  Maximum Dollar 
          Shares Purchased  Value that May Yet 
  Total Number  Average  as Part of Publicly  Be Purchased 
  of Shares  Price Paid  Announced Plans  Under the Plans or 
Period Purchased  per Share  or Programs  Programs 
May 4, 2008, to May 31, 2008        102,151,797  $608,291,573 
June 1, 2008, to June 28, 2008        102,151,797   608,291,573 
June 29, 2008, to July 26, 2008  1,913,643  $121.66   104,065,440   375,485,100 
July 27, 2008, to August 30, 2008  1,991,011  $133.80   106,056,451   109,085,287 
Total  3,904,654  $127.85   106,056,451  $109,085,287 
                 
          Total Number of  Maximum Dollar 
  Total      Shares Purchased  Value that May 
  Number of  Average  as Part of Publicly  Yet Be Purchased 
  Shares  Price Paid  Announced Plans  Under the Plans 
Period Purchased  per Share  or Programs  or Programs 
May 9, 2010, to June 5, 2010  143,300  $187.00   143,300  $724,016,859 
June 6, 2010, to July 3, 2010  1,129,590   191.26   1,129,590   507,976,727 
July 4, 2010, to July 31, 2010  700,401   201.69   700,401   366,710,411 
August 1, 2010, to August 28, 2010  869,716   208.44   869,716   185,428,381 
             
Total  2,843,007  $198.87   2,843,007  $185,428,381 
             
On September 23, 2008, the Board of Directors raised the repurchase authorization from $6.4 billion to $6.9 billion.

15


The Company also repurchased, at fair value, an additional 30,617 shares in fiscal 2010, 37,190 shares in fiscal 2009, and 39,235 shares in fiscal 2008 65,152 shares in fiscal 2007, and 62,293 shares in fiscal 2006 from employees electing to sell their stock under the Company’s Third Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan, qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, under which all eligible employees may purchase AutoZone’s common stock at 85% of the lower of the market price of the common stock on the first day or last day of each calendar quarter through payroll deductions. Maximum permitted annual purchases are $15,000 per employee or 10 percent of compensation, whichever is less. Under the plan, 26,620 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2010, 29,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2009, and 36,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2008, 39,139 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2007, and 51,167 shares were sold in fiscal 2006.2008. At August 30, 2008, 349,75028, 2010, 293,983 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan. Under the Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan all eligible executives are permitted to purchase AutoZone’s common stock up to 25 percent of his or her annual salary and bonus. Purchases by executives under this plan were 1,480 shares in fiscal 2010, 1,705 shares in fiscal 2009, and 1,793 shares in fiscal 2008, 1,257 shares in fiscal 2007, and 811 shares in fiscal 2006.2008. At August 30, 2008, 261,24428, 2010, 250,575 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan.

16


Stock Performance Graph
This graph shows, from the end of fiscal year 20032005 to the end of fiscal year 2008,2010, changes in the value of $100 invested in each of the following: AutoZone’s common stock as compared to Standard & Poor’s 500 Composite Index and a peer group consisting of other automotive aftermarket retailers.(“S&P 500”).
                         
Company Name / Index 8/30/03  8/28/04  8/27/05  8/26/06  8/25/07  8/30/08 
AutoZone, Inc.
  100   82.09   103.98   95.00   134.27   149.49 
S&P 500 Index
  100   111.81   123.89   135.68   157.83   139.74 
Peer Group
  100   109.13   142.83   126.65   154.92   145.61 
The peer group consists of Advance Auto Parts, Inc, CSK Auto Corporation (through 7/11/08), Genuine Parts Company, O’Reilly Automotive, Inc., and The Pep Boys-Manny, Moe & Jack.

 

1617


Item 6. Selected Financial Data
                               
(in thousands, except per share data and Fiscal Year Ended August 
(in thousands, except per share data, same store sales and Fiscal Year Ended August 
selected operating data) 2008(1)(2) 2007(2) 2006(2) 2005(3) 2004(4)  2010 2009 2008(1) 2007 2006 
 
Income Statement Data
  
Net sales $6,522,706 $6,169,804 $5,948,355 $5,710,882 $5,637,025  $7,362,618 $6,816,824 $6,522,706 $6,169,804 $5,948,355 
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses 3,254,645 3,105,554 3,009,835 2,918,334 2,880,446  3,650,874 3,400,375 3,254,645 3,105,554 3,009,835 
           
Gross profit 3,711,744 3,416,449 3,268,061 3,064,250 2,938,520 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses 2,143,927 2,008,984 1,928,595 1,816,884 1,757,873  2,392,330 2,240,387 2,143,927 2,008,984 1,928,595 
                      
Operating profit 1,124,134 1,055,266 1,009,925 975,664 998,706  1,319,414 1,176,062 1,124,134 1,055,266 1,009,925 
Interest expense — net 116,745 119,116 107,889 102,443 92,804 
Interest expense, net 158,909 142,316 116,745 119,116 107,889 
                      
Income before income taxes 1,007,389 936,150 902,036 873,221 905,902  1,160,505 1,033,746 1,007,389 936,150 902,036 
Income taxes 365,783 340,478 332,761 302,202 339,700 
Income tax expense 422,194 376,697 365,783 340,478 332,761 
                      
Net income $641,606 $595,672 $569,275 $571,019 $566,202  $738,311 $657,049 $641,606 $595,672 $569,275 
                      
 
Diluted earnings per share $10.04 $8.53 $7.50 $7.18 $6.56  $14.97 $11.73 $10.04 $8.53 $7.50 
           
            
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share 63,875 69,844 75,859 79,508 86,350  49,304 55,992 63,875 69,844 75,859 
                      
  
Same Store Sales
 
Increase in domestic comparable store net sales(2)
  5.4%  4.4%  0.4%  0.1%  0.4%
 
Balance Sheet Data
  
Current assets $2,586,301 $2,270,455 $2,118,927 $1,929,459 $1,755,757  $2,611,821 $2,561,730 $2,586,301 $2,270,455 $2,118,927 
Working capital (deficit) 66,981  (15,439) 64,359 118,300 4,706 
Working (deficit) capital  (452,139)  (145,022) 66,981  (15,439) 64,359 
Total assets 5,257,112 4,804,709 4,526,306 4,245,257 3,912,565  5,571,594 5,318,405 5,257,112 4,804,709 4,526,306 
Current liabilities 2,519,320 2,285,895 2,054,568 1,811,159 1,751,051  3,063,960 2,706,752 2,519,320 2,285,895 2,054,568 
Debt 2,250,000 1,935,618 1,857,157 1,861,850 1,869,250  2,908,486 2,726,900 2,250,000 1,935,618 1,857,157 
Long-term capital leases 48,144 39,073     66,333 38,029 48,144 39,073  
Stockholders’ equity $229,687 $403,200 $469,528 $391,007 $171,393 
Stockholders’ (deficit) equity $(738,765) $(433,074) $229,687 $403,200 $469,528 
  
Selected Operating Data
  
Number of domestic stores at beginning of year 3,933 3,771 3,592 3,420 3,219 
           
Number of stores at beginning of year 4,417 4,240 4,056 3,871 3,673 
New stores 160 163 185 175 202  213 180 185 186 204 
Closed stores 1 1 6 3 1  3 3 1 1 6 
                      
Net new stores 159 162 179 172 201  210 177 184 185 198 
                      
Relocated stores 14 18 18 7 4  3 9 14 18 18 
                      
Number of domestic stores at end of year 4,092 3,933 3,771 3,592 3,420 
Number of Mexico stores at end of year 148 123 100 81 63 
Number of stores at end of year 4,627 4,417 4,240 4,056 3,871 
                      
Number of total stores at end of year 4,240 4,056 3,871 3,673 3,483 
            
Total domestic store square footage
(in thousands)
 26,236 25,135 24,016 22,808 21,689 
Average square footage per domestic store 6,412 6,391 6,369 6,350 6,342 
Increase in domestic store square footage  4%  5%  5%  5%  6%
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store net sales(5)
  0.4%  0.1%  0.4%  (2.1)%  0.1%
Average net sales per domestic store
(in thousands)
 $1,532 $1,523 $1,548 $1,573 $1,647 
Average net sales per domestic store square foot $239 $239 $243 $248 $259 
Total domestic employees at end of year 54,572 54,859 52,677 50,869 48,294 
Total store square footage (in thousands) 30,027 28,550 27,291 26,044 24,713 
Average square footage per store 6,490 6,464 6,437 6,421 6,384 
Increase in store square footage  5%  5%  5%  5%  6%
Inventory per store (in thousands) $498 $500 $507 $495 $477 
Average net sales per store (in thousands) $1,595 $1,541 $1,539 $1,525 $1,546 
Net sales per store square foot $246 $239 $239 $238 $243 
Total employees at end of year (in thousands) 63 60 57 55 53 
Merchandise under pay-on-scan arrangements (in thousands) $6,732 $22,387 $92,142 $151,682 $146,573  $634 $3,530 $6,732 $22,387 $92,142 
Inventory turnover(6)
 1.6x 1.6x 1.7x 1.8x 1.9x
Inventory turnover(3)
 1.6x 1.5x 1.6x 1.6x 1.7x
Accounts payable to inventory ratio  95.0%  93.2%  92.0%  92.5%  91.5%  105.6%  96.0%  95.0%  93.2%  92.0%
After-tax return on invested capital (7)
  24.0%  22.7%  22.2%  23.9%  25.1%
After-tax return on invested capital (4)
  27.6%  24.4%  23.9%  23.2%  22.7%
Adjusted debt to EBITDAR(5)
 2.4 2.5 2.2 2.1 2.1 
Net cash provided by operating activities (in thousands) $912,814 $845,194 $822,747 $648,083 $638,379  $1,196,252 $923,808 $921,100 $845,194 $822,747 
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt (in thousands)(8)
 $690,621 $678,522 $599,507 $432,210 $509,447 
Return on average equity  203%  137%  132%  203%  208%
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt (in thousands)(6)
 $947,643 $673,347 $690,621 $678,522 $599,507 
   
(1) ConsistedThe fiscal year ended August 30, 2008 consisted of 53 weeks.
 
(2) Fiscal 2008 operating results include a $18.4 million pre-tax non-cash expense for share-based compensation, 2007 operating results include a $18.5 million pre-tax non-cash expense for share-based compensation, and fiscal 2006 operating results contain a $17.4 million pre-tax non-cash expense for share-based compensation as a result of the adoption of SFAS 123 (R) at the beginning of fiscal 2006.
(3)Fiscal 2005 operating results include a $40.3 million pre-tax non-cash charge related to lease accounting, which includes the impact on prior years and reflects additional amortization of leasehold improvements and additional rent expense, and a $21.3 million income tax benefit from the repatriation of earnings from our Mexican operations and other discrete income tax items.

17


(4)Fiscal 2004 operating results include $42.1 million in pre-tax gains from warranty negotiations with certain vendors.
(5)The domestic comparable sales increases (decreases) are based on sales for all domestic stores open at least one year. Relocated stores are included in the same store sales computation based on the year the original store was opened. Closed store sales are included in the same store sales computation up to the week it closes, and excluded from the computation for all periods subsequent to closing.
 
(6)(3) Inventory turnover is calculated as cost of sales divided by the average merchandise inventory balance over the year.trailing 5 quarters. The calculation includes cost of sales related to pay-on-scan sales, which were $2.5 million for the 52 weeks ended August 28, 2010, $5.8 million for the 52 weeks ended August 29, 2009, $19.2 million for the 53 weeks ended August 30, 2008, $85.4 million for the 52 weeks ended August 25, 2007, and $198.1 million for the 52 weeks ended August 26, 2006, $234.6 million for the 52 weeks ended August 27, 2005, and $83.2 million for the 52 weeks ended August 28, 2004.2006.
 
(7)(4) After-tax return on invested capital is calculateddefined as after-tax operating profit (excluding rent charges) divided by average invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

18


(5)Adjusted debt to EBITDAR is defined as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rents times six; divided by net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-based compensation expense. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
 
(8)(6) Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt is calculateddefined as the change in cash and cash equivalents less the change in debt plus treasury stock purchases. See Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

18


Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
We are the nation’s leading specialty retailer and a leading distributor of automotive replacement parts and accessories. We began operations in 1979 and at August 30, 2008,28, 2010, operated 4,0924,389 stores in the United States and Puerto Rico, and 148238 in Mexico. Each of our stores carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. In manyAt August 28, 2010, in 2,424 of our domestic stores and 173 of our Mexico stores, we also have a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations and service stations.public sector accounts. We also sell the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software. On the web,software through www.alldata.com. Additionally, we sell diagnostic and repair information and automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products through www.autozone.com.www.autozone.com, and as part of our commercial sales program, through www.autozonepro.com. We do not derive revenue from automotive repair or installation.installation services.
Executive Summary
AutoZoneWe achieved a solidstrong performance in fiscal 20082010, delivering record earnings of $642$738 million and sales growth of $353$546 million over the prior year. We completed the fiscal year with solidstrong growth in our commercial sales and an increase inretail businesses. We are excited about our retail sales. We arebusiness opportunities and encouraged by the increase in our commercial business, where we continue to build our internal sales force and remain focused on strengtheningto refine our retail business. We believeparts assortment. There are various factors occurring within the challenging macro environment,current economy that affect both our customers and our industry, including increases in gas prices,the impact of the recent recession, the credit crisis and higher unemployment, has impacted our customers. Basedunemployment. As consumers’ cash flows have decreased due to these factors, we believe consumers have become more likely to keep their current vehicles longer and perform repair and maintenance in order to keep those vehicles well maintained. Our belief is supported by industry data showing an increase in the average age of vehicles on the current macro environment,road and recent declines in new car sales, which we believe have led to an increase in demand for the products that we sell. Given the nature of these macroeconomic factors, we cannot predict whether or for how long these trends will continue, nor can we predict to what degree these trends will impact us in the future. Our primary response to fluctuations in the demand for the products we sell is to adjust our advertising message, store staffing, and product assortment. We continue to communicatebelieve we are well positioned to help our customers save money and meet their needs in a challenging macro economic environment.
Also, we believe changes in gas prices impact our extensive product categories that are focused on improvingcustomers’ behavior with respect to driving and maintaining their cars. With approximately ten billion gallons of unleaded gas mileage and saving money by performing maintenance on their vehicles.consumed each month across the United States, each $1 dollar decrease at the pump contributes approximately $10 billion of additional spending capacity to consumers each month. Given the unpredictability of gas prices, we cannot predict whether gas prices will increase or decrease in the future, nor can we predict how any future changes in gas prices will impact our sales in future periods.
We believe theThe two statistics thatwe believe have the closest correlation to our market growth over the long-term are miles driven and the number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road. Miles driven declined for the ninth straight month in July 2008. August data is not yet available. We believe higher gas prices have contributed to these trends. Conversely, the number of older vehicles (seven years old or older) on the road has continued to increase annually. We currently do not believe the combined impact of these trends to be material to our business.
Key Initiatives — During fiscal 2008, we continued to reinforce the importance of improving the customer shopping experience by focusing on continuous training on product knowledge, leadership and most importantly, our culture of customer satisfaction. Additionally, we made steady progress on our category management initiatives by making enhancements to our merchandise assortment planning tools, updating category line reviews, expanding our parts assortment, and increasing retail prices to help mitigate the exposure to our business from increased costs. Also, we maintained our focus on Commercial sales training to develop a first class Commercial field sales organization. Lastly, we continued to gain traction on our new electronic parts catalogue, Z-net®, by improving its capabilities and highlighting this customer service enhancement in our marketing campaign.
We continue to see our customers being more cautious with their buying habits in the midst of a challenging environment; however, we believe we are well positioned moving into fiscal 2009 and are confident we can continue offering a value proposition that is compelling to our customers.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2008 Compared with Fiscal 2007
For the year ended August 30, 2008, AutoZone reported net sales of $6.523 billion compared with $6.170 billion for the year ended August 25, 2007, a 5.7% increase from fiscal 2007. This growth was primarily driven by an increase in the number of open stores, a 1.9% increase from the addition of the 53rd week and domestic same store sales increase of 0.4%. At August 30, 2008, we operated 4,092 domestic stores and 148 in Mexico, compared with 3,933 domestic stores and 123 in Mexico at August 25, 2007. Domestic retail sales increased 4.5% and domestic commercial sales increased 6.8% from prior year. ALLDATA and Mexico sales increased over prior year, contributing 1.2 percentage points of the total increase in net sales.

 

19


Miles Driven
We believe that as the number of miles driven increases, consumers’ vehicles are more likely to need service and maintenance, resulting in an increase in the need for automotive hard parts and maintenance items. Prior to the recession, we had seen a close correlation between annual miles driven and our annual net sales; however, this correlation has not existed in the recent short-term recessionary period. Since the beginning of the fiscal year and through July 2010 (latest publicly available information), miles driven were relatively flat as compared to the comparable prior year period. Throughout this period and contrary to the correlation experienced prior to the recession, sales have grown at an increased rate, while miles driven have grown at a slower rate than what we have historically experienced. We believe that the impact of changes in other factors, primarily an increase in seven year old or older vehicles, more than offset the impact of miles driven. As the economy continues to recover, we believe that annual miles driven will return to pre-recession low single digit growth rates, and the correlation between annual miles driven and the annual sales growth of our industry should return.
Seven Year Old or Older Vehicles
Since 2008, new vehicle sales have been significantly lower than historical levels, which we believe contributed to an increasing number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road. We estimate vehicles are driven an average of approximately 12,500 miles each year. In seven years, the average miles driven equates to approximately 87,500 miles. Our experience is that at this point in a vehicle’s life, most vehicles are not covered by warranties and increased maintenance is needed to keep the vehicle operating. According to data provided by the Automotive Aftermarket Industry Association, the number of seven year old or older vehicles increased by approximately 2.2% during the 2009 calendar year as compared to the 2008 calendar year. As the number of seven year old or older vehicles on the road increases, we expect an increase in demand for the products that we sell. In the near term, we expect this trend to continue, as consumers keep their cars longer in an effort to save money during this uncertain economy.
Results of Operations
Fiscal 2010 Compared with Fiscal 2009
For the fiscal year ended August 28, 2010, we reported net sales of $7.363 billion compared with $6.817 billion for the year ended August 29, 2009, an 8.0% increase from fiscal 2009. This growth was driven primarily by an increase in domestic same store sales of 5.4% and sales from new stores of $203.4 million. The improvement in same store sales was driven by an improvement in transaction count trends, while increases in average transaction value remained generally consistent with our long-term trends. Higher transaction value is attributable to product inflation due to both more complex, costly products and commodity price increases.
At August 28, 2010, we operated 4,389 domestic stores and 238 stores in Mexico, compared with 4,229 domestic stores and 188 stores in Mexico at August 29, 2009. We reported a domestic retail sales increase of 6.9% and a domestic commercial sales increase of 13.8% for fiscal 2010.
Gross profit for fiscal 20082010 was $3.268$3.712 billion, or 50.4% of net sales, compared with $3.416 billion, or 50.1% of net sales compared with $3.064 billion, or 49.7% of net sales, for fiscal 2007.2009. The increaseimprovement in gross profit as a percent of net salesmargin was primarily attributable to leveraging distribution costs due to the positive impact of category management efforts, partially offset by increased distribution expense relating to higher fuel costs.
Vendor funding is primarily recorded as a reduction to inventories and recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the inventories are sold; however, vendor funding for specific selling activities is recorded as a reduction to operating, selling, general and administrative expenses. Historically, we have classified the majority of our funding as a reduction to inventory; however, during the current year we began to transition to more specific promotions and selling activities as we increased our efforts with vendors to develop tactics to allow them to drive sales and showcase their product, which affect selling, general and administrative expenses.operating efficiencies (19 basis points).
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 20082010 increased to $2.392 billion, or 32.5% of net sales, from $2.240 billion, or 32.9% of net sales for fiscal 2009. The reduction in operating expenses, as a percentage of sales, reflected leverage of store operating expenses due to higher sales, partially offset by higher pension expense (17 basis points) and the continued investment in the hub store initiative (16 basis points).
Interest expense, net for fiscal 2010 was $158.9 million compared with $142.3 million during fiscal 2009. This increase was due to higher average borrowing levels over the comparable prior year period. Average borrowings for fiscal 2010 were $2.752 billion, compared with $2.460 billion for fiscal 2009 and weighted average borrowing rates were 5.3% for fiscal 2010, compared to 5.4% for fiscal 2009.
Our effective income tax rate was 36.4% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2010 compared to 36.4% for fiscal 2009.
Net income for fiscal 2010 increased by 12.4% to $738.3 million, and diluted earnings per share increased 27.6% to $14.97 from $11.73 in fiscal 2009. The impact of the fiscal 2010 stock repurchases on diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2010 was an increase of approximately $0.74.

20


Fiscal 2009 Compared with Fiscal 2008
For the year ended August 29, 2009, we reported net sales of $6.817 billion compared with $6.523 billion for the year ended August 30, 2008, a 4.5% increase from fiscal 2008. Excluding $125.9 million of sales from the 53rdweek included in the prior year, total company net sales increased 6.6%. This growth was driven primarily by an increase in domestic same store sales of 4.4% and sales from new stores of $165.5 million. The improvement in same store sales was driven by an improvement in transaction count trends, while increases in average transaction value remained generally consistent with our long-term trends. Higher transaction value is attributable to product inflation due to both more complex, costly products and commodity price increases.
At August 29, 2009, we operated 4,229 domestic stores and 188 stores in Mexico, compared with 4,092 domestic stores and 148 stores in Mexico at August 30, 2008. Excluding the sales from the 53rdweek in the prior year, domestic retail sales increased 7.1% and domestic commercial sales increased 4.3%.
Gross profit for fiscal 2009 was $3.416 billion, or 50.1% of net sales, compared with $3.268 billion, or 50.1% of net sales, for fiscal 2008. Gross profit as a percent of net sales was positively impacted by favorable distribution costs from improved efficiencies and lower fuel costs. However, this favorability was largely offset by a shift in mix to lower margin products.
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2009 increased to $2.240 billion, or 32.9% of net sales, from $2.144 billion, or 32.9% of net sales from $2.009 billion, or 32.6% of net sales for fiscal 2007. The increase of operating expenses, as a percentage of2008. Leverage from increased sales was primarily duelargely offset by expenses associated with our continued enhancements to higher employee medical expenseour hub stores (17 basis points), an acceleration of our store maintenance program (9 basis points), and fuel expense fora continued expansion of our commercial fleet.sales force (7 basis points).
Interest expense, net for fiscal 20082009 was $116.7$142.3 million compared with $119.1$116.7 million during fiscal 2007.2008. This decreaseincrease was primarily due to lower short-term rates and was offset by higher average borrowing levels over the comparable prior year period and the impacta higher percentage of the additional week in the current fiscal year.fixed rate debt. Average borrowings for fiscal 20082009 were $2.024$2.460 billion, compared with $1.972$2.024 billion for fiscal 2007. Weighted2008 and weighted average borrowing rates were 5.2% at August 30, 2008,5.4% for fiscal 2009, compared to 5.7% at August 25, 2007.5.2% for fiscal 2008.
Our effective income tax rate was 36.3%36.4% of pre-tax income for fiscal 20082009 compared to 36.4%36.3% for fiscal 2007. Refer to “Note D — Income Taxes” for additional information regarding our income tax rate.2008.
Net income for fiscal 20082009 increased by 7.7%2.4% to $641.6$657.0 million, and diluted earnings per share increased 17.8%16.8% to $10.04$11.73 from $8.53$10.04 in fiscal 2007.2008. The impact of the fiscal 20082009 stock repurchases on diluted earnings per share in fiscal 20082009 was an increase of approximately $0.29.$0.78. Excluding the additional week in the prior year, net income for the year increased 5.1%5.0% over the previous year, to $625.8 million, while diluted earnings per share increased 14.9% to $9.80 per share.
Fiscal 2007 Compared with Fiscal 2006
For the year ended August 25, 2007, AutoZone reported net sales of $6.170 billion compared with $5.948 billion for the year ended August 26, 2006, a 3.7% increase from fiscal 2006. This growth was primarily driven by an increase in the number of open stores. At August 25, 2007, we operated 3,933 domestic stores and 123 in Mexico, compared with 3,771 domestic stores and 100 in Mexico at August 26, 2006. Domestic retail sales increased 3.4% and domestic commercial sales decreased 0.4% from prior year. ALLDATA and Mexico sales increased over prior year, contributing 0.9 percentage points of the total increase in net sales. Domestic same store sales, or sales for domestic stores open at least one year, increased 0.1% from the prior year.
Gross profit for fiscal 2007 was $3.064 billion, or 49.7% of net sales, compared with $2.939 billion, or 49.4% of net sales, for fiscal 2006. The improvement in gross profit margin was primarily attributable to ongoing category management initiatives and supply chain efficiencies.
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses for fiscal 2007 increased to $2.009 billion, or 32.6% of net sales, from $1.929 billion, or 32.4% of net sales for fiscal 2006. The increase in expenses is driven primarily by higher occupancy cost versus the prior year.
Interest expense, net for fiscal 2007 was $119.1 million compared with $107.9 million during fiscal 2006. This increase was due to higher short term rates and higher average borrowing levels over the comparable prior year period and the recognition of interest expense on capital lease obligations that were accounted for as operating leases prior to a modification to the lease agreements in fiscal 2007. Average borrowings for fiscal 2007 were $1.972 billion, compared with $1.928 billion for fiscal 2006. Weighted average borrowing rates were 5.7% at August 25, 2007, compared to 5.5% at August 26, 2006.

20


Our effective income tax rate decreased to 36.4% of pre-tax income for fiscal 2007 as compared to 36.9% for fiscal 2006 primarily due to benefits from changes in our pre-tax earnings mix and an increase in certain federal and state tax credits. Refer to “Note D — Income Taxes” for additional information regarding our income tax rate.
Net income for fiscal 2007 increased 4.6% to $595.7 million, and diluted earnings per share increased 13.6% to $8.53 from $7.50 in fiscal 2006. The impact of the fiscal 2007 stock repurchases on diluted earnings per share in fiscal 2007 was an increase of approximately $0.14.19.7%.
Seasonality and Quarterly Periods
AutoZone’sOur business is somewhat seasonal in nature, with the highest sales typically occurring in the spring and summer months of MarchFebruary through September, in which average weekly per-store sales historically have been about 15% to 25% higher than in the slower months of December through February.and January. During short periods of time, a store’s sales can be affected by weather conditions. Extremely hot or extremely cold weather may enhance sales by causing parts to fail and spurring sales of seasonal products. Mild or rainy weather tends to soften sales, as parts failure rates are lower in mild weather, andwith elective maintenance is deferred during periods of rainy weather. Over the longer term, the effects of weather balance out, as we have stores throughout the United States, Puerto Rico and Mexico.
Each of the first three quarters of AutoZone’sour fiscal year consisted of 12 weeks, and the fourth quarter consisted of 16 weeks in 2010, 16 weeks in 2009, and 17 weeks in 2008 and 16 weeks in 2007 and 2006.2008. Because the fourth quarter contains the seasonally high sales volume and consists of 16 or 17 weeks, compared with 12 weeks for each of the first three quarters, our fourth quarter represents a disproportionate share of the annual net sales and net income. The fourth quarter of fiscal year 2010, containing 16 weeks, represented 33.2% of annual sales and 36.4% of net income; the fourth quarter of fiscal 2009, containing 16 weeks, represented 32.7% of annual sales and 35.9% of net income; and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, containing 17 weeks, represented 33.9% of annual sales and 38.0% of net income; the fourth quarter of fiscal 2007, containing 16 weeks, represented 32.5% of annual sales and 36.5% of net income; and the fourth quarter of fiscal 2006, containing 16 weeks, represented 32.6% of annual sales and 37.5% of net income.

21


Liquidity and Capital Resources
The primary source of our liquidity is our cash flows realized through the sale of automotive parts and accessories. Net cash provided by operating activities was $1,196.3 million in fiscal 2010, $923.8 million in fiscal 2009, and $921.1 million in fiscal 2008, $845.2 million in fiscal 2007, and $822.7 million in fiscal 2006.2008. The increase over prior year was primarily due to higher net income of $81.3 million and improvements in accounts payable as our cash flows from operating activities continue to benefit from our inventory purchases being largely financed by our vendors. The increase in fiscal 2009 as compared to fiscal 2008 was due primarily to the growth in net income, and to a lesser extent, timing of income tax payments and deductions, and improvements in our accounts payable to inventory ratio as our vendors continue to finance a large portion of our inventory. Partially offsetting this increase waswere higher accounts receivable.receivable and the 53rd week of income in fiscal 2008. We have maintainedhad an accounts payable to inventory ratio of 106% at August 28, 2010, 96% at August 29, 2009, and 95% at August 30, 2008, 93%2008. Our inventory increases are primarily attributable to an increased number of stores and to a lesser extent, our efforts to update product assortment in all of our stores. Many of our vendors have supported our initiative to update our product assortment by providing extended payment terms. These extended payment terms have allowed us to continue to grow accounts payable at August 25, 2007, and 92% at August 26, 2006.a faster rate than inventory.
AutoZone’sOur primary capital requirement has been the funding of itsour continued new storenew-store development program. From the beginning of fiscal 20062008 to August 30, 2008,28, 2010, we have opened 567 net578 new stores. Net cash flows used in investing activities were $307.4 million in fiscal 2010, compared to $263.7 million in fiscal 2009, and $243.2 million in fiscal 2008,2008. We invested $315.4 million in capital assets in fiscal 2010, compared to $228.7$272.2 million in fiscal 2007, and $268.3 millioncapital assets in fiscal 2006. We invested2009, and $243.6 million in capital assets in fiscal 2008, compared to $224.5 million2008. The increase in capital assetsexpenditures during this time was primarily attributable to the number and types of stores opened and increased investment in fiscal 2007, and $263.6 million in capital assets in fiscal 2006.our existing stores. New store openings were 213 for fiscal 2010, 180 for fiscal 2009, and 185 for fiscal 2008, 186 for fiscal 2007, and 204 for fiscal 2006.2008. We invest a portion of our assets held by the Company’s wholly owned insurance captive in marketable securities. We acquired $54.3$56.2 million of marketable securities in fiscal 2008, $94.62010, $48.4 million in fiscal 20072009, and $160.0$54.3 million in fiscal 2006.2008. We had proceeds from matured marketable securities of $52.6 million in fiscal 2010, $46.3 million in fiscal 2009, and $50.7 million in fiscal 2008, $86.9 million in fiscal 2007 and $145.4 million in fiscal 2006.2008. Capital asset disposals provided $11.5 million in fiscal 2010, $10.7 million in fiscal 2009, and $4.0 million in fiscal 2008, $3.5 million in fiscal 2007, and $9.8 million in fiscal 2006.2008.
Net cash used in financing activities was $883.5 million in fiscal 2010, $806.9 million in fiscal 2009, and $522.7 million in fiscal 2008, $621.4 million in fiscal 2007, and $537.7 million in fiscal 2006.2008. The net cash used in financing activities reflected purchases of treasury stock which totaled $1.1 billion for fiscal 2010, $1.3 billion for fiscal 2009, and $849.2 million for fiscal 2008, $761.9 million for fiscal 2007, and $578.1 million for fiscal 2006.2008. The treasury stock purchases in fiscal 2008, 20072010, 2009 and 20062008 were primarily funded by cash flow from operations, and at times, by increases in debt levels. Proceeds from issuance of debt reflectedwere $26.2 million for fiscal 2010, $500.0 million for fiscal 2009, and $750.0 million for fiscal 2008, none2008. There were no debt repayments for fiscal 2007 and $200.02010; debt repayments were $300.7 million for fiscal 2006. Debt repayments totaled2009, and $229.8 million for fiscal 2008, $5.8 million for2008. In fiscal 2007 and $152.7 million for fiscal 2006. As discussed in Note F, in August 2008,2009, we issued $500.0 million in 6.50% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250.0 million in 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018. A portion ofused the proceeds from the issuance of debt wasto repay outstanding commercial paper indebtedness, to prepay our $300 million term loan in August 2009 and for general corporate purposes, including for working capital requirements, capital expenditures, store openings and stock repurchases. Proceeds from the debt issuance in fiscal 2008 were used to repay outstanding commercial paper which had increased for the repayment of the $190.0 million senior notes that matured in July. We intend to use the remainder of the proceeds to redeem or repurchase existing debt, for working capital needs, for capital expenditures, for the repurchase of common stock under our stock repurchase programindebtedness and for general corporate purposes.purposes, including for working capital requirements, capital expenditures, store openings and stock repurchases. Net repayments of commercial paper were $206.7 million for fiscal 2008 and $52.0 million for fiscal 2006. For fiscal 2007, net proceeds from the issuance of commercial paper were $84.3$155.4 million for fiscal 2010 and $277.6 million for fiscal 2009. For fiscal 2008, net repayments of commercial paper were $206.7 million.

21


We expect to invest in our business consistent with historical rates during fiscal 2009,2011, with our investment being directed primarily related to our new storenew-store development program and enhancements to existing stores and systems. infrastructure. The amount of our investments in our new-store program is impacted by different factors, including such factors as whether the building and land are purchased (requiring higher investment) or leased (generally lower investment), located in the United States or Mexico, or located in urban or rural areas. During fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009, and fiscal 2008, our capital expenditures have increased by approximately 16%, 12% and 9%, respectively, as compared to the prior year. Our mix of store openings has moved away from build-to-suit leases (lower cost) to ground leases and land purchases (higher cost), resulting in increased capital expenditures during the previous three years, and we expect this trend to continue during the fiscal year ending August 27, 2011.
In addition to the building and land costs, our new storenew-store development program requires working capital, predominantly for inventories. Historically, we have negotiated extended payment terms from suppliers, reducing the working capital required.required and resulting in a high accounts payable to inventory ratio. We plan to continue leveraging our inventory purchases; however, our ability to do so may be impactedlimited by a prolonged tightening of the credit markets which may directly limit our vendors’ capacity to factor their receivables from us. Certain vendors participate in financing arrangements with financial institutions whereby they factor their receivables from us, allowing them to receive payment on our invoices at a discounted rate.

22


Depending on the timing and magnitude of our future investments (either in the form of leased or purchased properties or acquisitions), we anticipate that we will rely primarily on internally generated funds and available borrowing capacity to support a majority of our capital expenditures, working capital requirements and stock repurchases. The balance may be funded through new borrowings. We anticipate that we will be able to obtain such financing in view of our credit ratingratings and favorable experiences in the debt markets in the past.
Credit Ratings
AtFor the fiscal year ended August 30, 2008, AutoZone had28, 2010, our after-tax return on invested capital (“ROIC”) was 27.6% as compared to 24.4% for the comparable prior year period. ROIC is calculated as after-tax operating profit (excluding rent charges) divided by average invested capital (which includes a senior unsecured debt credit rating from Standard & Poor’sfactor to capitalize operating leases). ROIC increased primarily due to increased after-tax operating profit. We use ROIC to evaluate whether we are effectively using our capital resources and believe it is an important indicator of BBB and a commercial paper rating of A-2. Moody’s Investors Service had assigned the Company a senior unsecured debt credit rating of Baa2 and a commercial paper rating of P-2. Fitch Ratings assigned the Company a BBB rating for senior unsecured debt and an F-2 rating for commercial paper. As of August 30, 2008, Moody’s, Standard & Poor’s and Fitch had AutoZone listed as having a “stable” outlook. If our credit ratings drop, our interest expense may increase; similarly, we anticipate that our interest expense may decrease if our investment ratings are raised. If our commercial paper ratings drop below current levels, we may have difficulty continuing to utilize the commercial paper market and our interest expense will likely increase, as we will then be required to access more expensive bank lines of credit. If our senior unsecured debt ratings drop below investment grade, our access to financing may become more limited.overall operating performance.
Debt Facilities
We maintainIn July 2009, we terminated our $1.0 billion of revolving credit facilitiesfacility, which was scheduled to expire in fiscal 2010, and replaced it with a group of banksan $800 million revolving credit facility. This credit facility is available to primarily support commercial paper borrowings, letters of credit and other short-term unsecured bank loans. The credit facilitiesfacility may be increased to $1.3$1.0 billion at AutoZone’sour election and subject to bank credit capacity and approval, may include up to $200 million in letters of credit, and may include up to $100 million in capital leases.leases each fiscal year. As the available balance is reduced by commercial paper borrowings and certain outstanding letters of credit, the Companywe had $879.7$331.1 million in available capacity under these facilitiesthis facility at August 30, 2008. The28, 2010. Under the revolving credit facility, we may borrow funds consisting of Eurodollar loans or base rate of interest payableloans. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate, defined as the London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus the applicable percentage, which could range from 150 basis points to 450 basis points, depending upon our senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating. Interest accrues on base rate loans at the prime rate. We also have the option to borrow funds under the terms of a swingline loan subfacility. The revolving credit facilitiesfacility expires in July 2012.
The revolving credit facility agreement requires that our consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the last day of each quarter shall be no less than 2.50:1. This ratio is defined as the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes and rents to (ii) consolidated interest expense plus consolidated rents. Our consolidated interest coverage ratio as of August 28, 2010 was 4.27:1.
In June 2010, we entered into a functionletter of Bankcredit facility that allows us to request the participating bank to issue letters of America’s base rate or a Eurodollar rate (each as definedcredit on our behalf up to an aggregate amount of $100 million. The letter of credit facility is in addition to the letters of credit that may be issued under the revolving credit facility. As of August 28, 2010, we have $100.0 million in letters of credit outstanding under the letter of credit facility, agreements), or a combination thereof. These facilities expirewhich expires in May 2010.June 2013.
Our $300.0During August 2009, we elected to prepay, without penalty, the $300 million bank term loan entered in December 2004, was amended in April 2006 to have similar terms and conditions as the $1.0 billion credit facilities, but with a December 2009 maturity, and was further amended in August 2007 to reduce the interest rate on Eurodollar loans. That credit agreement with a group of banks providessubsequently amended. The term loan facility provided for a term loan, which consistsconsisted of, at our election, base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or a combination thereof. The interest accruesentire unpaid principal amount of the term loan would be due and payable in full on December 23, 2009, when the facility was scheduled to terminate. Interest accrued on base rate loans at a base rate per annum equal to the higher of the prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1%. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate plus the applicable percentage, which can range from 30 basis points to 90 basis points, depending upon our senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating. Based on our ratings at August 30, 2008, the applicable percentage on Eurodollar loans is 35 basis points. We may select interest periods of one, two, three or six months for Eurodollar loans, subject to availability. Interest is payable at the end of the selected interest period, but no less frequently than quarterly. We entered into an interest rate swap agreement on December 29, 2004, to effectively fix, based on current debt ratings, the interest rate of the term loan at 4.4%. We haveThe outstanding liability associated with the option to extend loans into subsequent interest period(s) or convert them into loans of another interest rate type. The entire unpaid principal amountswap totaled $3.6 million, and was expensed in operating, selling, general and administrative expenses upon termination of the term loan will be due and payablehedge in full on December 23, 2009, when the facility terminates. We may prepay the term loan in whole or in part at any time without penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in the case of prepayment of Eurodollar borrowings.fiscal 2009.

 

2223


On June 25, 2008, we entered into an agreement with ESL Investments, Inc., setting forth certain understandings and agreements (see Exhibit 10.32 for complete details) regarding the voting by ESL Investments, Inc., on behalf of itself and its affiliates (collectively, “ESL”), of certain shares of common stock of AutoZone, Inc. and related matters. Among other things, we agreed to use our commercially reasonable efforts to increase our adjusted debt/EBITDAR target ratio from 2.1:1 to 2.5:1 no later than February 14, 2009. We calculate adjusted debt as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and rent times six; and we calculate EBITDAR by adding interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and options expenses to net income.
During July 2008, our $190.0 million Senior Notes maturing at that time were repaid with an increase in commercial paper. On August 4, 2008,2, 2009, we issued $500.0$500 million in 6.50%5.75% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250.0 million in 7.125% Senior Notes due 20182015 under our shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2008. We used a portion of the proceeds to pay down our commercial paper and intend to use the remainder for general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new store openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions.
During April 2006, our $150.0 million Senior Notes maturing at that time were repaid with an increase in commercial paper. On June 8, 2006,2008 (the “Shelf Registration”). Also, on August 4, 2008, we issued $200.0$500 million in 6.95%6.50% Senior Notes due 20162014 and $250 million in 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018 under our existing shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on August 17, 2004. That shelf registration allowedShelf Registration. The Shelf Registration allows us to sell up to $300 millionan indeterminate amount in debt securities to fund general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new store openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions. The remainderIn fiscal 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the issuance of debt to repay outstanding commercial paper indebtedness, to prepay our $300 million term loan in August 2009 and for general corporate purposes. Proceeds from the shelf registration was cancelleddebt issuance in February, 2007.fiscal 2008 were used to repay outstanding commercial paper indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.
The 5.75% Senior Notes issued in July 2009 and the 6.50% and 7.125% notesSenior Notes issued during August 2008, (collectively, the “Notes”), are subject to an interest rate adjustment if the debt ratings assigned to the notesNotes are downgraded anddowngraded. They also contain a provision wherethat repayment of the notesNotes may be accelerated if AutoZone experienceswe experience a change in control (as defined in the agreements). Our borrowings under our other Senior Notes arrangementssenior notes contain minimal covenants, primarily restrictions on liens. Under our other borrowing arrangements,revolving credit facility, covenants include limitations on total indebtedness, restrictions on liens, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a change of control provision that may require acceleration of the repayment obligations under certain circumstances. All of the repayment obligations under our borrowing arrangements may be accelerated and come due prior to the scheduled payment date if covenants are breached or an event of default occurs.
As of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, we were in compliance with all covenants related to our borrowing arrangements and expect to remain in compliance with all covenants.those covenants in the future.
Our adjusted debt to earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-based compensation expense (“EBITDAR”) ratio was 2.4:1 and 2.5:1 as of August 28, 2010 and August 29, 2009, respectively. We calculate adjusted debt as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and rent times six; and we calculate EBITDAR by adding interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-based compensation expense to net income. We target our debt levels to a ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDAR in order to maintain our investment grade credit ratings. We believe this is important information for the management of our debt levels.
Stock Repurchases
During 1998, we announced a program permitting us to repurchase a portion of our outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by our Board of Directors. The program was amended in June 20082010 to increase the repurchase authorization to $6.4$8.9 billion from $5.9$8.4 billion. From January 1998 to August 30, 2008,28, 2010, we have repurchased a total of 106.1121.7 million shares at an aggregate cost of $6.3$8.7 billion. We repurchased 6.4 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $1.1 billion during fiscal 2010, 9.3 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $1.3 billion during fiscal 2009, and 6.8 million shares of common stock at an aggregate cost of $849.2 million during fiscal 2008, 6.02008. Considering cumulative repurchases as of August 28, 2010, we have $185.4 million remaining under the Board of Director’s authorization to repurchase our common stock.
On September 28, 2010, the Board of Directors voted to increase the authorization by $500 million to raise the cumulative share repurchase authorization from $8.9 billion to $9.4 billion. We have repurchased approximately 800 thousand shares of itsour common stock at an aggregate cost of $761.9$185.9 million during fiscal 2007, and 6.2 million shares of its common stock at an aggregate cost of $578.1 million during fiscal 2006.
On September 23, 2008, the Board of Directors raised the repurchase authorization from $6.4 billion to $6.9 billion. From August 31, 2008 to October 20, 2008, we repurchased 1.6 million shares for $204.4 million.2011.

 

2324


Financial Commitments
The following table shows AutoZone’sour significant contractual obligations as of August 30, 2008:28, 2010:
                     
  Total  Payment Due by Period 
  Contractual  Less than  Between  Between  Over 5 
(in thousands) Obligations  1 year  1-3 years  4-5 years  years 
                     
Long-term debt (1) $2,250,000  $  $500,000  $500,000  $1,250,000 
Interest payments (2)  764,985   134,153   237,208   205,362   188,262 
Operating leases (3)  1,372,451   161,435   283,836   219,645   707,535 
Capital leases (4)  68,710   16,341   31,568   20,801    
Self-insurance reserves (5)  147,594   49,081   44,986   22,637   30,890 
Construction commitments  19,972   19,972          
                
  $4,623,712  $380,982  $1,097,598  $968,445  $2,176,687 
                
                     
  Total  Payment Due by Period 
  Contractual  Less than  Between  Between  Over 
(in thousands) Obligations  1 year  1-3 years  4-5 years  5 years 
Long-term debt(1)
 $2,882,300  $632,300  $500,000  $1,000,000  $750,000 
Interest payments(2)
  617,225   140,600   245,238   155,800   75,587 
Operating leases(3)
  1,740,047   196,291   357,943   284,836   900,977 
Capital leases (4)
  92,745   21,947   44,832   25,966    
Self-insurance reserves(5)
  158,384   60,955   43,045   22,688   31,696 
Construction commitments  15,757   15,757          
                
  $5,506,458  $1,067,850  $1,191,058  $1,489,290  $1,758,260 
                
   
(1) Long-term debt balances represent principal maturities, excluding interest.
 
(2) Represents obligations for interest payments on long-term debt, including the effect of interest rate hedges.debt.
 
(3) Operating lease obligations are inclusive of amounts accrued within deferred rent and closed store obligations reflected in our consolidated balance sheets.
 
(4) Capital lease obligations include related interest.
 
(5) The Company retainsWe retain a significant portion of the risks associated with workersworkers’ compensation, employee health, general and product liability, property, and automotivevehicle insurance. These amounts represent undiscounted estimates based on actuarial calculations. Although these obligations do not have scheduled maturities, the timing of future payments are predictable based upon historical patterns. Accordingly, the Company reflectswe reflect the net present value of these obligations in itsour consolidated balance sheets.
We have otherpension obligations reflected in our consolidated balance sheet that are not reflected in the table above due to the absence of scheduled maturities or due toand the nature of the account. Therefore,As of August 28, 2010, our pension liability is $211.5 million and our pension assets are valued at $117.2 million. Amounts recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss are $94.3 million at August 28, 2010. These amounts will be amortized into pension expense in the future, unless they are recovered in future periods through actuarial gains.
Additionally, our tax liability for uncertain tax positions, including interest and penalties, was $46.5 million at August 28, 2010. Approximately $28.4 million is classified as current liabilities and $18.1 million is classified as long-term liabilities. We did not reflect these obligations in the table above as we are unable to make an estimate of the timing of payments due to uncertainties in the timing of the settlement of these payments cannot be determined, except for amounts estimated to be payable in 2009 that are included in current liabilities.tax positions.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The following table reflects outstanding letters of credit and surety bonds as of August 30, 2008.28, 2010:
        
 Total  Total 
 Other  Other 
(in thousands) Commitments  Commitments 
Standby letters of credit $93,993  $107,554 
Surety bonds 13,844  23,723 
      
 $107,837  $131,277 
      
A substantial portion of the outstanding standby letters of credit (which are primarily renewed on an annual basis) and surety bonds are used to cover reimbursement obligations to our workers’ compensation carriers. There are no additional contingent liabilities associated with them as the underlying liabilities are already reflected in our consolidated balance sheet. The standby letters of credit and surety bonds arrangements expire within one year, but have automatic renewal clauses.
In conjunction with our commercial sales program, we offer credit to some of our commercial customers. The majority of our receivables related to the credit program are sold to a third party at a discount for cash with limited recourse. AutoZone has recorded a reserve for this recourse. At August 30, 2008, the receivables facility had an outstanding balance of $55.4 million and the balance of the recourse reserve was $1.2 million.

24


Value of Pension Assets
At August 30, 2008, the fair market value of AutoZone’s pension assets was $160.9 million, and the related accumulated benefit obligation was $156.7 million based on a May 31, 2008 measurement date. On January 1, 2003, our defined benefit pension plans were frozen. Accordingly, plan participants earn no new benefits under the plan formulas, and no new participants may join the plans. The material assumptions for fiscal 2008 are an expected long-term rate of return on plan assets of 8.0% and a discount rate of 6.90%. For additional information regarding AutoZone’s qualified and non-qualified pension plans refer to “Note I — Pensions and Savings Plans” in the accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measures
“Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” include certain financial measures not derived in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). These non-GAAP financial measures provide additional information for determining our optimum capital structure and are used to assist management in evaluating performance and in making appropriate business decisions to maximize stockholders’ value.

25


Non-GAAP financial measures should not be used as a substitute for GAAP financial measures, or considered in isolation, for the purpose of analyzing our operating performance, financial position or cash flows. However, we have presented the non-GAAP financial measures, as we believe they provide additional information that is useful to investors as it indicates more clearly the Company’sour comparative year-to-year operating results. Furthermore, our management and Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors use the abovementionedabove-mentioned non-GAAP financial measures to analyze and compare our underlying operating results and to determine payments of performance-based compensation. We have included a reconciliation of this information to the most comparable GAAP measures in the following reconciliation tables.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Cash Flow Before Share Repurchases and Changes in Debt
The following table reconciles net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents to cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt, which is presented in the “Selected Financial Data”.:
                                        
 Fiscal Year Ended August  Fiscal Year Ended August 
(in thousands) 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004  2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents $155,807 $(4,904) $16,748 $(2,042) $(16,250) $5,574 $(149,755) $155,807 $(4,904) $16,748 
Less: Increase (decrease) in debt 313,473 78,461  (4,693)  (7,400) 322,405  181,586 476,900 314,382 78,461  (4,693)
Less: Share repurchases  (849,196)  (761,887)  (578,066)  (426,852)  (848,102)  (1,123,655)  (1,300,002)  (849,196)  (761,887)  (578,066)
                      
Cash flow before share repurchases and changes in debt $691,530 $678,522 $599,507 $432,210 $509,447  $947,643 $673,347 $690,621 $678,522 $599,507 
                      

25


Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: After-TaxAfter-tax Return on Invested Capital
The following table reconciles the percentages of after-tax return on invested capital, or “ROIC.” After-tax return on invested capitalROIC. ROIC is calculated as after-tax operating profit (excluding rent) divided by average invested capital (which includes a factor to capitalize operating leases). The ROIC percentages are presented in the “Selected Financial Data.”Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:
                                        
 Fiscal Year Ended August  Fiscal Year Ended August 
(in thousands, except percentage data) 2008 2007 2006 2005 2004 
(in thousands, except percentages) 2010 2009 2008(1) 2007 2006 
Net income $641,606 $595,672 $569,275 $571,019 $566,202  $738,311 $657,049 $641,606 $595,672 $569,275 
Adjustments:  
After-tax interest 74,355 75,793 68,089 65,533 58,003 
After-tax rent 105,166 97,050 90,808 96,367 73,086 
           
Interest expense 158,909 142,316 116,745 119,116 107,889 
Rent expense 195,632 181,308 165,121 152,523 143,888 
Tax effect(2)
  (128,983)  (117,929)  (102,345)  (98,796)  (92,880)
            
After-tax return $821,127 $768,515 $728,172 $732,919 $697,291  $963,869 $862,744 $821,127 $768,515 $728,172 
                      
 
Average debt (1)(3) $2,015,186 $1,955,652 $1,909,011 $1,969,639 $1,787,307  $2,769,617 $2,468,351 $2,074,738 $1,888,989 $1,822,642 
Average equity (2) 353,411 478,853 510,657 316,639 292,802 
Average (deficit) equity(4)
  (507,885)  (75,162) 308,401 482,702 518,303 
Rent x 6 (3)(5) 990,726 915,138 863,328 774,706 701,621  1,173,792 1,087,848 990,726 915,138 863,328 
Average capital lease obligations (4)(6) 60,824 30,538     62,220 58,901 60,763 27,093  
                      
Pre-tax invested capital $3,420,147 $3,380,181 $3,282,996 $3,060,984 $2,781,730  $3,497,744 $3,539,938 $3,434,628 $3,313,922 $3,204,273 
                      
  
ROIC  24.0%  22.7%  22.2%  23.9%  25.1%  27.6%  24.4%  23.9%  23.2%  22.7%
                      
   
(1) The fiscal year ended August 30, 2008 consisted of 53 weeks.
(2)The effective tax rate during fiscal 2010, fiscal 2009, fiscal 2008, fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 was 36.4%, 36.4%, 36.3%, 36.4% and 36.9% respectively.
(3)Average debt is equal to the average of our long-term debt measured at the endas of the prior fiscal year and each of the 13 fiscal periods in the current fiscal year. Long-term debt (in thousands) was $1,546,845 at August 30, 2003.previous five quarters.
 
(2)(4) Average equity is equal to the average of our stockholders’ (deficit) equity measured at the endas of the prior fiscal year and each of the 13 fiscal periods of the current fiscal year. Stockholders’ equity (in thousands) was $373,758 at August 30, 2003.previous five quarters.
 
(3)(5) Rent is multiplied by a factor of six to capitalize operating leases in the determination of pre-tax invested capital. This calculation excludes the impact from the cumulative lease accounting adjustments recorded in the second quarter of fiscal 2005.
 
(4)(6) Average of the capital lease obligations relating to vehicle capital leases entered into at the beginning of fiscal 2007 is computed as the average over the trailing 13 periods.five quarters. Rent expense associated with the vehicles prior to the conversion to capital leases is included in the rent for purposes of calculating return on invested capital.

26


Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Adjusted Debt to EBITDAR
The following table reconciles the ratio of adjusted debt to EBITDAR. Adjusted debt to EBITDAR is calculated as the sum of total debt, capital lease obligations and annual rents times six; divided by net income plus interest, taxes, depreciation, amortization, rent and share-based compensation expense. The adjusted debt to EBITDAR ratios are presented in “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”:
                     
  Fiscal Year Ended August 
(in thousands, except ratios) 2010  2009  2008(1)  2007  2006 
Net income $738,311  $657,049  $641,606  $595,672  $569,275 
Add: Interest expense  158,909   142,316   116,745   119,116   107,889 
Income tax expense  422,194   376,697   365,783   340,478   332,761 
                
EBIT  1,319,414   1,176,062   1,124,134   1,055,266   1,009,925 
Add: Depreciation expense  192,084   180,433   169,509   159,411   139,465 
Rent expense  195,632   181,308   165,121   152,523   143,888 
Option expense  19,120   19,135   18,388   18,462   17,370 
                
EBITDAR $1,726,250  $1,556,938  $1,477,152  $1,385,662  $1,310,648 
                
                     
Debt $2,908,486  $2,726,900  $2,250,000  $1,935,618  $1,857,157 
Capital lease obligations  88,280   54,764   64,061   55,088    
Rent x 6  1,173,792   1,087,848   990,726   915,138   863,328 
                
Adjusted debt $4,170,558  $3,869,512  $3,304,787  $2,905,844  $2,720,485 
                
                     
Adjusted debt to EDITDAR  2.4   2.5   2.2   2.1   2.1 
                
(1)The fiscal year ended August 30, 2008 consisted of 53 weeks.
Reconciliation of Non-GAAP Financial Measure: Fiscal 2008 Results Excluding Impact of 53rdWeek: Week
The following table summarizes the favorable impact of the additional week ofincluded in the 53 week53-week fiscal year ended August 30, 2008.2008:
                                        
 Fiscal 2008    Fiscal 2008   
 Results of    Results of Results of   
 Fiscal 2008 Results of Operations    Fiscal 2008 Operations Operations   
 Results of Percent of Operations for Excluding Percent of 
(in thousands, except per share and percentage data) Operations Revenue 53rdWeek 53rdWeek Revenue 
(in thousands, except per share data Results of Percent of for Excluding Percent of 
and percentages) Operations Revenue 53rd Week 53rd Week Revenue 
Net sales $6,522,706  100.0% $(125,894) $6,396,812  100.0% $6,522,706  100.0% $(125,894) $6,396,812  100.0%
Cost of sales 3,254,645  49.9%  (62,700) 3,191,945  49.9% 3,254,645  49.9%  (62,700) 3,191,945  49.9%
                      
Gross profit 3,268,061  50.1%  (63,194) 3,204,867  50.1% 3,268,061  50.1%  (63,194) 3,204,867  50.1%
Operating expenses 2,143,927  32.9%  (36,087) 2,107,840  33.0% 2,143,927  32.9%  (36,087) 2,107,840  32.9%
                      
Operating profit 1,124,134  17.2%  (27,107) 1,097,027  17.1% 1,124,134  17.2%  (27,107) 1,097,027  17.2%
Interest expense, net 116,745  1.8%  (2,340) 114,405  1.8% 116,745  1.8%  (2,340) 114,405  1.8%
                      
Income before taxes 1,007,389  15.4%  (24,767) 982,622  15.4%
Income before income taxes 1,007,389  15.4%  (24,767) 982,622  15.4%
Income taxes 365,783  5.6%  (8,967) 356,816  5.6% 365,783  5.6%  (8,967) 356,816  5.6%
                      
Net income $641,606  9.8% $(15,800) $625,806  9.8% $641,606  9.8% $(15,800) $625,806  9.8%
                      
Diluted earnings per share $10.04 $(0.24) $9.80  $10.04 $(0.24) $9.80 
              

26


Recent Accounting Pronouncements
On August 26, 2007, we adoptedIn October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretationissued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605 (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). This interpretation establishes new standardsASU addresses the accounting for the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expectedmultiple-deliverable revenue arrangements to enable vendors to account for deliverables separately rather than as a combined unit. This ASU will be taken in income tax returns. For additional information oneffective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into commencing with our first fiscal quarter beginning August 29, 2010. We do not expect the impact of adoption of FIN 48, refer to “Note D — Income Taxes” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
On August 25, 2007, we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires recognition in the balance sheet of the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, and the recognition in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) of unrecognized gains or losses and prior service costs or credits. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) of the plan. Refer to “Note I, Pension and Savings Plans” for further description of this adoption.
Additionally, SFAS 158 requires the measurement date for plan assets and liabilities to coincide with the sponsor’s year end. We currently use a May 31 measurement date for our plans; therefore, this standard will require us to change our measurement date to our fiscal year end beginning in fiscal 2009. The impact from adopting the measurement provisions is not expectedASU 2009-13 to have a material impacteffect on the Company’s results of operations.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective at the beginning of fiscal 2009 for financial assets and liabilities and at the beginning of fiscal 2010 for nonfinancial assets and liabilities. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have an immediate material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This new standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 will be effective for AutoZone in fiscal 2009. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements because we do not currently intend to elect to apply fair value to any financial instruments that are not already reported at fair value.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement 141R, “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS 141R”). This standard significantly changes the accounting for and reporting of business combinations in consolidated financial statements. Among other things, SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and requires the expensing of most transaction and restructuring costs. The standard is effective for us beginning August 30, 2009 (fiscal 2010) and is applicable only to transactions occurring after the effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, including an amendment for ARB No. 51,” (“SFAS 160”). SFAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 is effective for us beginning August 30, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133,” (“SFAS 161”). SFAS 161 amends SFAS No. 133 to change the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities. Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective for AutoZone beginning in fiscal 2010. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 161.

 

27


In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS 162”). SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States. SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days after the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU section 411.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions affecting the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period and related disclosures of contingent liabilities. In the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, we describe our significant accounting policies used in preparing the consolidated financial statements. Our policies are evaluated on an ongoing basis and are drawn from historical experience and other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results could differ under different assumptions or conditions. Our senior management has identified the critical accounting policies for the areas that are materially impacted by estimates and assumptions and have discussed such policies with the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors. The following items in our consolidated financial statements represent our critical accounting policies that require significant estimation or judgment:judgment by management:
Inventory Reserves and Cost of Sales
LIFO
We state our inventories at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) method. Included in inventory are related purchasing, storagemethod for domestic merchandise and handling costs.the first-in, first out (“FIFO”) method for Mexico inventories. Due to price deflation on the Company’sour merchandise purchases, the Company’sour domestic inventory balances are effectively maintained under the first-in, first-out method as the Company’s policy isFIFO method. We do not to write up inventory for favorable LIFO adjustments, resulting in cost of sales being reflected at the higher amount. The natureand due to price deflation, LIFO costs of our domestic inventories exceed replacement costs by $247.3 million at August 28, 2010, calculated using the dollar value method.
Inventory Obsolescence and Shrinkage
Our inventory, primarily hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products, is suchused on vehicles that have rather long lives; and therefore, the risk of obsolescence is minimal and the majority of excess inventory has historically been returned to our vendors for credit. We provide reservesIn the isolated instances where less than full credit will be received for such returns and where we anticipate that items will be sold at retail prices that are less than recorded costs. costs, we record a charge (less than $20 million in each of the last three years) through cost of sales for the difference. These charges are based on management’s judgment, including estimates and assumptions regarding marketability of products and the market value of inventory to be sold in future periods.
Historically, we have not encountered material exposure to inventory obsolescence or excess inventory, nor have we experienced material changes to our estimates. However, we may be exposed to material losses should our vendors alter their policy with regard to accepting excess inventory returns.
Additionally, we reduce inventory for estimatedprojected losses related to shrinkage. Our shrink estimateshrinkage, which is estimated based on historical losses verified by ongoingand current inventory loss trends resulting from previous physical inventories. Shrinkage may occur due to theft, loss or inaccurate records for the receipt of goods, among other things. Throughout the year, we take physical inventory counts.counts of our stores and distribution centers to verify these estimates. We make assumptions regarding upcoming physical inventory counts that may differ from actual results. Over the last three years, there has been less than a 25 basis point fluctuation in our shrinkage rate.
Each quarter, we evaluate the accrued shrinkage in light of the actual shrink results. To the extent our actual physical inventory count results differ from our estimates, we may experience material adjustments to our financial statements. Historically, we have not experienced material adjustments to our shrinkage estimates and do not believe there is a reasonable likelihood that there will be a material change in the future estimates or assumptions we use.
A 10% difference in our inventory reserves as of August 28, 2010, would have affected net income by approximately $5 million in fiscal 2010.
Vendor Allowances
AutoZone receivesWe receive various payments and allowances from itsour vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements. Monies received from vendors include rebates,arrangements, including allowances for warranties, advertising and promotional funds. The amounts to be receivedgeneral promotion of vendor products. Vendor allowances are subject to purchase volumes and the terms of the vendor agreements, which generally do not state an expiration date, but are subject to ongoing negotiations that may be impacted in the future based on changes in market conditions, vendor marketing strategies and changes in the profitability or sell-through of the related merchandise.
Rebates and other miscellaneous incentives are earned based on purchases or product sales and are accrued ratably over the purchase or sale of the related product, but only if it is reasonably certain that the required volume levels will be reached. These monies are recordedtreated as a reduction of inventories andinventory, unless they are recognizedprovided as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventories are sold.
Allowances and promotional funds earned under vendor funding programs are accounted for pursuant to the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”). The majority of the vendor funds received is recorded as a reduction of the cost of inventories and is recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as these inventories are sold. For arrangements that provide for reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred by the Company in selling the vendor’s products,products. Approximately 85% of the vendor funds received are recorded as a reduction of the cost of inventories and recognized as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses in the period in which the specific costs were incurred.cost of sales as these inventories are sold.

 

28


Impairments
In accordanceBased on our vendor agreements, a significant portion of vendor funding we receive is based on our inventory purchases. Therefore, we record receivables for funding earned but not yet received as we purchase inventory. During the year, we regularly review the receivables from vendors to ensure vendors are able to meet their obligations. We generally have not recorded a reserve against these receivables as we have legal right of offset with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accountingour vendors for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”),payments owed them. Historically, we evaluate the recoverabilityhave had minimal write-offs (less than $100 thousand in any of the carrying amounts of long-lived assets, such as property and equipment, covered by this standard annually and more frequently if events or changes in circumstances dictate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. As part of the evaluation, we review performance at the store level to identify any stores with current period operating losses that should be considered for impairment. We compare the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows with the carrying amounts of the assets.
Under the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), we perform an annual test of goodwill to compare the estimated fair value of goodwill to the carrying amount to determine if any impairment exists. We perform the annual impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless circumstances dictate more frequent assessments.
If impairments are indicated by either of the above evaluations, the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized as an impairment loss. Such evaluations require management to make certain assumptions based upon information available at the time the evaluation is performed, which could differ from actual results.last three years).
Self-Insurance
We retain a significant portion of the risks associated with workers’ compensation, vehicle, employee health, general and productproducts liability, property and propertyvehicle insurance losses; and we maintain stop-loss coverageobtain third party insurance to limit the exposure related to certain of these risks. Liabilities associated with these lossesOur self-insurance reserve estimates totaled $156 million, $158 million, and $145 million as of the end of fiscal years 2010, 2009, and 2008, respectively. These changes are primarily reflective of our growing operations, including inflation, increases in vehicles and the number of hours worked, as well as our historical claims experience and changes in our discount rate.
The assumptions made by management in estimating our self-insurance reserves include estimatesconsideration of bothhistorical cost experience, judgments about the present and expected levels of cost per claim and retention levels. We utilize various methods, including analyses of historical trends and actuarial methods, to estimate the cost to settle reported claims, filed and lossesclaims incurred but not yet reported. Through variousThe actuarial methods which include analysesdevelop estimates of historicalthe future ultimate claim costs based on the claims incurred as of the balance sheet date. When estimating these liabilities, we consider factors, such as the severity, duration and frequency of claims, legal costs associated with claims, healthcare trends, and utilizationprojected inflation of actuaries,related factors. In recent history, we have experienced improvements in frequency and duration of claims; however, medical and wage inflation have partially offset these trends. Throughout this time, our methods for determining our exposure have remained consistent, and these trends have been appropriately factored into our reserve estimates.
Management believes that the Companyvarious assumptions developed and actuarial methods used to determine our self- insurance reserves are reasonable and provide meaningful data and information that management uses to make its best estimate of our exposure to these risks. Arriving at these estimates, however, requires a significant amount of subjective judgment by management, and as a result these estimates are uncertain and our actual exposure may be different from our estimates. For example, changes in our assumptions about health care costs, the severity of accidents and the incidence of illness, the average size of claims and other factors could cause actual claim costs to vary materially from our assumptions and estimates, causing our reserves to be overstated or understated. For instance, a 10% change in our self-insurance liability would have affected net income by approximately $10 million for fiscal 2010.
As we obtain additional information and refine our methods regarding the assumptions and estimates we use to recognize liabilities incurred, we will adjust our reserves accordingly. In recent years, we have experienced favorable claims development, particularly related to workers’ compensation, and have adjusted our estimates as necessary. We attribute this success to programs, such as return to work and projects aimed at accelerating claims closure. The programs have matured and proven to be successful and are therefore considered in our current and future assumptions regarding claims costs.
Our liabilities for workers’ compensation, certain general and product liability, property and vehicle claims do not have scheduled maturities; however, the timing of future payments is predictable based on historical patterns and is relied upon in determining the current portion of these risks. Theliabilities. Accordingly, we reflect the net present value of the obligations we determine to be long-term portionsusing the risk-free interest rate as of the balance sheet date. If the discount rate used to calculate the present value of these liabilities are recorded at our estimatereserves changed by 50 basis points, net income would have changed approximately $2 million for fiscal 2010. Our liability for health benefits is classified as current, as the historical average duration of their net present value. We believe the amounts accrued are adequate, although actual losses may differ from the amounts provided.claims is approximately six weeks.

29


Income Taxes
We accrueOur income tax returns are audited by state, federal and pay income taxes based onforeign tax authorities, and we are typically engaged in various tax examinations at any given time. Tax contingencies often arise due to uncertainty or differing interpretations of the application of tax statutes, regulations and case law ofrules throughout the various jurisdictions in which we operate. IncomeThe contingencies are influenced by items such as tax expense involves management judgment as toaudits, changes in tax laws, litigation, appeals and prior experience with similar tax positions. We regularly review our tax reserves for these items and assess the ultimate resolutionadequacy of anythe amount we have recorded. As of August 28, 2010, we had approximately $46.5 million reserved for uncertain tax matters in disputepositions.
We evaluate potential exposures associated with state, federal and foreignour various tax authorities. We measure and record income tax contingency accrualsfilings in accordance with ASC Topic 740 (formerly Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “AccountingAccounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes.”
We recognize liabilitiesTaxes) by estimating a liability for uncertain income tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult
We believe our estimates to be reasonable and subjectivehave not experienced material adjustments to our reserves in the previous three years; however, actual results could differ from our estimates and we may be exposed to gains or losses that could be material. Specifically, management has used judgment and made assumptions to estimate such amounts, as we must determine the probabilitylikely outcome of various possible outcomes. We reevaluate these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis or when new information becomes available to management. These reevaluations are based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, successfully settled issues under audit, expirations due to statues, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an increasepositions. Additionally, to the extent we prevail in matters for which a liability has been established, or must pay in excess of recognized reserves, our effective tax accrual.
We classify interest related to income tax liabilities as income tax expense, and if applicable, penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense. The income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties that are due within one year of the balance sheet date are presented as current liabilities. The remaining portion of our income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties are presented as noncurrent liabilities because payment of cash is not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date. These noncurrent income tax liabilities are recordedrate in the caption “Other liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets.any particular period could be materially affected.
Litigation and Other Contingent Liabilities
We have received claims related to and been notified that we are a defendant in a number of legal proceedings resulting from our business, such as employment matters, product liability claims and general liability claims related to our store premises. We calculate contingent loss accruals using our best estimate of our probable and reasonably estimable contingent liabilities.

29


Pension Obligation
Prior to January 1, 2003, substantially all full-time employees were covered by a qualified defined benefit pension plan. The benefits under the plan were based on years of service and the employee’s highest consecutive five-year average compensation. On January 1, 2003, the plan was frozen. Accordingly, pension plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan. On January 1, 2003, the Company’sour supplemental, unqualified defined benefit pension plan for certain highly compensated employees was also frozen. Accordingly, plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan. As the plan benefits are frozen, the annual pension expense and recorded liabilities are not impacted by increases in future compensation levels, but are impacted by the use of two key assumptions in the calculation of these balances:
i.Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets:estimated by considering the composition of our asset portfolio, our historical long-term investment performance and current market conditions.
ii.Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations:adjusted annually based on the interest rate for long-term high-quality corporate bonds as of the measurement date (May 31) using yields for maturities that are in line with the duration of our pension liabilities. This same discount rate is also used to determine pension expense for the following plan year.
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets:We have assumed an 8% long-term rate of return on our plan assets. This estimate is a judgmental matter in which management considers the composition of our asset portfolio, our historical long-term investment performance and current market conditions. We review the expected long-term rate of return on an annual basis, and revise it accordingly. Additionally, we monitor the mix of investments in our portfolio to ensure alignment with our long-term strategy to manage pension cost and reduce volatility in our assets. At August 28, 2010, our plan assets totaled $117 million in our qualified plan. Our assets are generally valued using the net asset values, which are determined by valuing investments at the closing price or last trade reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. We have no assets in our nonqualified plan. A 50 basis point change in our expected long term rate of return would impact annual pension expense/income by approximately $600 thousand for the qualified plan.
If such assumptions differ materially from actual experience,Discount rate used to determine benefit obligations:This rate is highly sensitive and is adjusted annually based on the interest rate for long-term, high-quality, corporate bonds as of the measurement date using yields for maturities that are in line with the duration of our pension liabilities. This same discount rate is also used to determine pension expense for the following plan year. For fiscal 2010, we assumed a discount rate of 5.25%. A decrease in the discount rate increases our projected benefit obligation and pension expense. A 50 basis point change in the discount rate at August 28, 2010 would impact could be material to our financial statements.annual pension expense/income by approximately $2.2 million for the qualified plan and $40 thousand for the nonqualified plan.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures Aboutabout Market Risk
AutoZone isWe are exposed to market risk from, among other things, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and fuel prices. From time to time, we use various financial instruments to reduce interest rate and fuel price risks. To date, based upon our current level of foreign operations, hedging costs and past changes in the associated foreign exchange rates, no derivative instruments have been utilized to reduce foreign exchange rate risk. All of our hedging activities are governed by guidelines that are authorized by our Board of Directors. Further, we do not buy or sell financial instruments for trading purposes.

30


Interest Rate Risk
AutoZone’sOur financial market risk results primarily from changes in interest rates. At times, we reduce our exposure to changes in interest rates by entering into various interest rate hedge instruments such as interest rate swap contracts, treasury lock agreements and forward-starting interest rate swaps.
AutoZone hasWe have historically utilized interest rate swaps to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt and to lock in fixed rates on future debt issuances. We reflect the current fair value of all interest rate hedge instruments in our consolidated balance sheets as a component of either other assets. All of the Company’scurrent assets or accrued expenses and other. Our interest rate hedge instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. We had an outstanding interest rate swap with a fair value of ($4.3) million at August 30, 2008, and $5.8 million at August 25, 2007, to effectively fix the interest rate on the $300.0 million term loan entered into during December 2004.
The relatedUnrealized gains and losses on interest rate hedges are deferred in stockholders’ equitydeficit as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income or loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income as a decrease or increase to interest expense in the period in which the related cash flows being hedged are recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of an interest rate hedge instrument does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the cash flow being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. The Company’searnings.
At August 28, 2010, we held forward starting interest rate swaps with a total notional amount of $300 million. These agreements, which expire in November of 2010, are used to hedge instrumentthe exposure to variability in future cash flows resulting from changes in variable interest rates relating to anticipated debt transactions. It is expected that upon settlement of the agreements, the realized gain or loss will be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense over the life of the underlying debt. During fiscal 2009, we terminated an interest rate swap related to a $300 million term loan that was determined to be highly effective as ofprepaid. As a result, at August 30, 2008.29, 2009, we had no outstanding interest rate swaps.

30


The fair value of our debt was estimated at $2.235$3.182 billion as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $1.928$2.853 billion as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar debt issues or on the current rates available to AutoZoneus for debt having the same remaining maturities. Such fair value is lessgreater than the carrying value of debt by $15.0$273.5 million and $126.5 million at August 30, 2008,28, 2010 and less than the carrying value of debt by $7.6 million at August 25, 2007. Considering the effect of the interest rate swap designated and effective as a cash flow hedge, we29, 2009, respectively. We had no variable rate debt outstanding at August 30, 2008, and $245.6$459.2 million of variable rate debt outstanding at August 25, 2007.28, 2010, and $277.6 million of variable rate debt outstanding at August 29, 2009. In fiscal 2007,2010, at this borrowing level for variable rate debt, a one percentage point increase in interest rates would have had an unfavorable impact on our pre-tax earnings and cash flows of $2.5 million, which includes the effects of the interest rate swap.$4.6 million. The primary interest rate exposure on variable rate debt is based on LIBOR. Considering the effect of the interest rate swap designated and effective as a cash flow hedge, weWe had outstanding fixed rate debt of $2.250$2.449 billion at August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $1.690 billion at August 25, 2007.29, 2009. A one percentage point increase in interest rates would reduce the fair value of our fixed rate debt by $90.7$94.2 million at August 30, 2008, and $60.8 million at August 25, 2007.28, 2010.
Fuel Price Risk
Fuel swap contracts that we utilize have not previously been designated as hedging instruments under the provisions of SFAS 133 and thus do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, although the instruments were executed to economically hedge a portion of our diesel fuel and unleaded fuel exposure. We did not enter into any fuel swap contracts during the 2008 or 20062010 fiscal years.year. During fiscal 2007year 2009, we entered into fuel swaps to economically hedge a portion of our dieselunleaded fuel exposure. These swaps were settled within a few daysAs of the fiscal year end andAugust 29, 2009, we had an outstanding liability of less than one hundred thousand dollars associated with our unleaded fuel swap which had no significant impact on costour results of sales foroperations.
Foreign Currency Risk
Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions include firm commitments and anticipated transactions denominated in a currency other than an entity’s functional currency. To minimize our risk, we generally enter into transactions denominated in their respective functional currencies. Foreign currency exposures arising from transactions denominated in currencies other than the 2007functional currency are not material.
Our primary foreign currency exposure arises from Mexican peso-denominated revenues and profits and their translation into U.S. dollars. We generally view our investments in the Mexican subsidiaries as long-term. As a result, we generally do not hedge these net investments. The net investment in the Mexican subsidiaries translated into U.S. dollars using the year-end exchange rates was $254.6 million at August 28, 2010 and $215.4 million at August, 29, 2009. The potential loss in value of our net investment in the Mexican subsidiaries resulting from a hypothetical 10 percent adverse change in quoted foreign currency exchange rates at August 28, 2010 and August 29, 2009, amounted to $23.1 million and $19.6 million, respectively. Any changes in our net investment in the Mexican subsidiaries relating to foreign currency exchange rates would be reflected in the foreign currency translation component of accumulated other comprehensive loss, unless the Mexican subsidiaries are sold or otherwise disposed.
During fiscal year.2010, exchange rates with respect to the Mexican peso increased by approximately 1.4% with respect to the U.S. dollar. Exchange rates with respect to the Mexican peso decreased by approximately 30% with respect to the U.S. dollar during fiscal 2009.

 

31


Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Index
     
  33 
     
  34 
     
  36 
     
  37 
     
  38 
     
  39 
     
  40 
     
  5862 

 

32


Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Our internal control over financial reporting includes, among other things, defined policies and procedures for conducting and governing our business, sophisticated information systems for processing transactions and properly trained staff. Mechanisms are in place to monitor the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, including regular testing performed by the Company’s internal audit team, which is comprised of both Deloitte & Touche LLP professionals and Company personnel. Actions are taken to correct deficiencies as they are identified. Our procedures for financial reporting include the active involvement of senior management, our Audit Committee and a staff of highly qualified financial and legal professionals.
Management, with the participation of our principal executive and financial officers, assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the end of our fiscal year. Management based its assessment on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria).Commission.
Based on this assessment, management has concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of August 30, 2008.28, 2010.
Our independent registered public accounting firm, Ernst & Young LLP, audited the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting. Ernst & Young LLP has issued theirits report concurring with management’s assessment, which is included in this Annual Report.Report on Form 10-K.
Certifications
Compliance with NYSE Corporate Governance Listing Standards
On January 8, 2008,4, 2010, the Company submitted to the New York Stock Exchange the Annual CEO Certification required pursuant to Section 303A.12(a) of the New York Stock Exchange Listed Company Manual.
Rule 13a-14(a) Certifications of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
The Company has filed, as exhibits to its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the certifications of its Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer required pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2004.

 

33


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc.
We have audited AutoZone, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria)“COSO criteria”). AutoZone, Inc.’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Overover Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’sAutoZone, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, AutoZone, Inc. maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, based on the COSO criteria.criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 30, 200828, 2010 and August 25, 200729, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 30, 200828, 2010 of AutoZone, Inc. and our report dated October 20, 200825, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Memphis, Tennessee
October 20, 200825, 2010

 

34


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of AutoZone, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 30, 200828, 2010 and August 25, 200729, 2009 and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders’ (deficit) equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 30, 2008.28, 2010. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’sAutoZone, Inc.’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AutoZone, Inc. as of August 30, 200828, 2010 and August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended August 30, 2008,28, 2010, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
As discussed in Note D to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted FASB Interpretation No. 48 “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109,” effective August 26, 2007.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the effectiveness of AutoZone, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, based on criteria established in Internal Control-IntegratedControl Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated October 20, 200825, 2010 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
Memphis, Tennessee
October 20, 200825, 2010

 

35


Consolidated Statements of Income
                        
 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 August 30, August 25, August 26,  August 28, August 29, August 30, 
 2008 2007 2006  2010 2009 2008 
(in thousands, except per share data) (53 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (52 Weeks)  (52 weeks) (52 weeks) (53 weeks) 
  
Net sales $6,522,706 $6,169,804 $5,948,355  $7,362,618 $6,816,824 $6,522,706 
Cost of sales, including warehouse and delivery expenses 3,254,645 3,105,554 3,009,835  3,650,874 3,400,375 3,254,645 
       
Gross profit 3,711,744 3,416,449 3,268,061 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses 2,143,927 2,008,984 1,928,595  2,392,330 2,240,387 2,143,927 
              
Operating profit 1,124,134 1,055,266 1,009,925  1,319,414 1,176,062 1,124,134 
Interest expense, net 116,745 119,116 107,889  158,909 142,316 116,745 
              
Income before income taxes 1,007,389 936,150 902,036  1,160,505 1,033,746 1,007,389 
Income taxes 365,783 340,478 332,761 
Income tax expense 422,194 376,697 365,783 
              
Net income $641,606 $595,672 $569,275  $738,311 $657,049 $641,606 
              
  
Weighted average shares for basic earnings per share 63,295 69,101 75,237  48,488 55,282 63,295 
Effect of dilutive stock equivalents 580 743 622  816 710 580 
              
Adjusted weighted average shares for diluted earnings per share 63,875 69,844 75,859  49,304 55,992 63,875 
        
 
Basic earnings per share $10.14 $8.62 $7.57  $15.23 $11.89 $10.14 
              
Diluted earnings per share $10.04 $8.53 $7.50  $14.97 $11.73 $10.04 
              
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

36


Consolidated Balance Sheets
                
 August 30, August 25,  August 28, August 29, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2008 2007 
(in thousands) 2010 2009 
  
Assets
  
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents $242,461 $86,654  $98,280 $92,706 
Accounts receivable 71,241 59,876  125,802 126,514 
Merchandise inventories 2,150,109 2,007,430  2,304,579 2,207,497 
Other current assets 122,490 116,495  83,160 135,013 
          
Total current assets 2,586,301 2,270,455  2,611,821 2,561,730 
 
Property and equipment:  
Land 643,699 625,992  690,098 656,516 
Buildings and improvements 1,814,668 1,720,172  2,013,301 1,900,610 
Equipment 850,679 780,199  923,595 887,521 
Leasehold improvements 202,098 183,601  247,748 219,606 
Construction in progress 128,133 85,581  192,519 145,161 
          
 3,639,277 3,395,545  4,067,261 3,809,414 
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization 1,349,621 1,217,703  1,547,315 1,455,057 
          
 2,289,656 2,177,842  2,519,946 2,354,357 
  
Goodwill, net of accumulated amortization 302,645 302,645 
Goodwill 302,645 302,645 
Deferred income taxes 38,283 21,331  46,223 59,067 
Other long-term assets 40,227 32,436  90,959 40,606 
          
 381,155 356,412  439,827 402,318 
          
 $5,257,112 $4,804,709  $5,571,594 $5,318,405 
          
  
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
 
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Deficit
 
Current liabilities:  
Accounts payable $2,043,271 $1,870,668  $2,433,050 $2,118,746 
Accrued expenses and other 327,664 307,633  432,368 381,271 
Income taxes payable 11,582 25,442  25,385 35,145 
Deferred income taxes 136,803 82,152  146,971 171,590 
Short-term borrowings 26,186  
          
Total current liabilities 2,519,320 2,285,895  3,063,960 2,706,752 
 
Long-term debt 2,250,000 1,935,618  2,882,300 2,726,900 
Other liabilities 258,105 179,996 
Other long-term liabilities 364,099 317,827 
  
Commitments and contingencies      
  
Stockholders’ equity: 
Stockholders’ deficit: 
Preferred stock, authorized 1,000 shares; no shares issued      
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 200,000 shares; 63,600 shares issued and 59,608 shares outstanding in 2008 and 71,250 shares issued and 65,960 shares outstanding in 2007 636 713 
Common stock, par value $.01 per share, authorized 200,000 shares; 50,061 shares issued and 45,107 shares outstanding in 2010 and 57,881 shares issued and 50,801 shares outstanding in 2009 501 579 
Additional paid-in capital 537,005 545,404  557,955 549,326 
Retained earnings 206,099 546,049 
Retained (deficit) earnings  (245,344) 136,935 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss  (4,135)  (9,550)  (106,468)  (92,035)
Treasury stock, at cost  (509,918)  (679,416)  (945,409)  (1,027,879)
          
Total stockholders’ equity 229,687 403,200 
Total stockholders’ deficit  (738,765)  (433,074)
          
 $5,257,112 $4,804,709  $5,571,594 $5,318,405 
          
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

37


Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
                        
 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 August 30, August 25, August 26,  August 28, August 29, August 30, 
 2008 2007 2006  2010 2009 2008 
(in thousands) (53 Weeks) (52 Weeks) (52 Weeks)  (52 weeks) (52 weeks) (53 weeks) 
  
Cash flows from operating activities:  
Net income $641,606 $595,672 $569,275  $738,311 $657,049 $641,606 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:  
Depreciation and amortization of property and equipment 169,509 159,411 139,465  192,084 180,433 169,509 
Amortization of debt origination fees 1,837 1,719 1,559  6,495 3,644 1,837 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options  (10,142)  (16,523)  (10,608)  (22,251)  (8,407)  (10,142)
Deferred income taxes 67,474 24,844 36,306   (9,023) 46,318 67,474 
Share-based compensation expense 18,388 18,462 17,370  19,120 19,135 18,388 
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:  
Accounts receivable  (11,145) 20,487 37,900  782  (56,823)  (11,145)
Merchandise inventories  (137,841)  (160,780)  (182,790)  (96,077)  (76,337)  (137,841)
Accounts payable and accrued expenses 175,733 186,228 184,986  349,122 137,158 175,733 
Income taxes payable  (3,861) 17,587 28,676  12,474 32,264  (3,861)
Other, net 9,542  (1,913) 608  5,215  (10,626) 9,542 
              
Net cash provided by operating activities 921,100 845,194 822,747  1,196,252 923,808 921,100 
  
Cash flows from investing activities:  
Capital expenditures  (243,594)  (224,474)  (263,580)  (315,400)  (272,247)  (243,594)
Purchase of marketable securities  (54,282)  (94,615)  (159,957)  (56,156)  (48,444)  (54,282)
Proceeds from sale of investments 50,712 86,921 145,369 
Proceeds from sale of marketable securities 52,620 46,306 50,712 
Disposal of capital assets 4,014 3,453 9,845  11,489 10,663 4,014 
              
Net cash used in investing activities  (243,150)  (228,715)  (268,323)  (307,447)  (263,722)  (243,150)
  
Cash flows from financing activities:  
Net (repayments of) proceeds from commercial paper  (206,700) 84,300  (51,993)
Net proceeds from (repayments of ) commercial paper 155,400 277,600  (206,700)
Proceeds from issuance of debt 750,000  200,000  26,186 500,000 750,000 
Repayment of debt  (229,827)  (5,839)  (152,700)   (300,700)  (229,827)
Net proceeds from sale of common stock 27,065 58,952 38,253  52,922 39,855 27,065 
Purchase of treasury stock  (849,196)  (761,887)  (578,066)  (1,123,655)  (1,300,002)  (849,196)
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options 10,142 16,523 10,608  22,251 8,407 10,142 
Payments of capital lease obligations  (15,880)  (11,360)    (16,597)  (17,040)  (15,880)
Other  (8,286)  (2,072)  (3,778)   (15,016)  (8,286)
              
Net cash used in financing activities ��(522,682)  (621,383)  (537,676)  (883,493)  (806,896)  (522,682)
  
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash 539    262  (2,945) 539 
              
  
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents 155,807  (4,904) 16,748  5,574  (149,755) 155,807 
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year 86,654 91,558 74,810  92,706 242,461 86,654 
              
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year $242,461 $86,654 $91,558  $98,280 $92,706 $242,461 
              
  
Supplemental cash flow information:  
Interest paid, net of interest cost capitalized $107,477 $116,580 $104,929  $150,745 $132,905 $107,477 
              
Income taxes paid $313,875 $299,566 $267,913  $420,575 $299,021 $313,875 
              
Assets acquired through capital lease $61,572 $69,325 $  $75,881 $16,880 $61,572 
              
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

38


Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity
                                           
 Accumulated      Accumulated     
 Common Additional Other      Common Additional Retained Other     
 Shares Common Paid-in Retained Comprehensive Treasury    Shares Common Paid-in (Deficit) Comprehensive Treasury   
(in thousands) Issued Stock Capital Earnings Loss Stock Total  Issued Stock Capital Earnings Loss Stock Total 
 
Balance at August 27, 2005 81,111 $811 $462,289 $370,276 $(36,581) $(405,788) $391,007 
Net income 569,275 569,275 
Minimum pension liability, net of taxes of $14,624 22,532 22,532 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (4,410)  (4,410)
Unrealized loss adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of ($98)  (181)  (181)
Net gains on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of $2,152 3,752 3,752 
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (612)  (612)
   
Comprehensive income 590,356 
Purchase of 6,187 shares of treasury stock  (578,066)  (578,066)
Retirement of treasury stock  (4,600)  (46)  (27,633)  (380,343) 408,022  
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans 729 7 38,246 38,253 
Share-based compensation expense 17,370 17,370 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options 10,608 10,608 
               
Balance at August 26, 2006 77,240 772 500,880 559,208  (15,500)  (575,832) 469,528 
Net income 595,672 595,672 
Minimum pension liability, net of taxes of $9,176 14,218 14,218 
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (3,240)  (3,240)
Unrealized gain adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of $56 104 104 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of ($1,627)  (2,813)  (2,813)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (612)  (612)
   
Comprehensive income 603,329 
Cumulative effect of adopting SFAS 158, net of taxes of ($1,089)  (1,707)  (1,707)
Purchase of 6,032 shares of treasury stock  (761,887)  (761,887)
Retirement of treasury stock  (6,900)  (68)  (49,404)  (608,831) 658,303  
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans 910 9 58,943 58,952 
Share-based compensation expense 18,462 18,462 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options 16,523 16,523 
               
Balance at August 25, 2007 71,250 713 545,404 546,049  (9,550)  (679,416) 403,200  71,250 $713 $545,404 $546,049 $(9,550) $(679,416) $403,200 
Net income 641,606 641,606  641,606 641,606 
Pension liability adjustments, net of taxes of ($1,145)  (1,817)  (1,817)  (1,817)  (1,817)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 13,965 13,965  13,965 13,965 
Unrealized gain adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of $142 263 263  263 263 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of ($3,715)  (6,398)  (6,398)  (6,398)  (6,398)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (598)  (598)
Reclassification of net gain on derivatives into earnings  (598)  (598)
        
Comprehensive income 647,021  647,021 
Cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48  (26,933)  (26,933)
Cumulative effect of adopting ASC Topic 740  (26,933)  (26,933)
Purchase of 6,802 shares of treasury stock  (849,196)  (849,196)  (849,196)  (849,196)
Retirement of treasury stock  (8,100)  (81)  (63,990)  (954,623) 1,018,694    (8,100)  (81)  (63,990)  (954,623) 1,018,694  
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans 450 4 27,061 27,065  450 4 27,061 27,065 
Share-based compensation expense 18,388 18,388  18,388 18,388 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options 10,142 10,142  10,142 10,142 
                              
Balance at August 30, 2008 63,600 636 537,005 206,099  (4,135)  (509,918) 229,687 
Net income 657,049 657,049 
Pension liability adjustments, net of taxes of ($29,481)  (46,956)  (46,956)
Foreign currency translation adjustment  (43,655)  (43,655)
Unrealized gain adjustment on marketable securities net of taxes of $306 568 568 
Reclassification of net loss on termination of swap into earnings, net of taxes of $1,601 2,744 2,744 
Reclassification of net gain on derivatives into earnings  (612)  (612)
    
Balance at August 30, 2008 63,600 $636 $537,005 $206,099 $(4,135) $(509,918) $229,687 
Comprehensive income 569,138 
Cumulative effect of adopting ASC Topic 715 measurement date, net of taxes of $198 300 11 311 
Purchase of 9,313 shares of treasury stock  (1,300,002)  (1,300,002)
Issuance of 3 shares of common stock 395 395 
Retirement of treasury shares  (6,223)  (62)  (55,071)  (726,513) 781,646  
Sale of common stock under stock option and stock purchase plans 504 5 39,850 39,855 
Share-based compensation expense 19,135 19,135 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options 8,407 8,407 
                              
Balance at August 29, 2009 57,881 579 549,326 136,935  (92,035)  (1,027,879)  (433,074)
Net income 738,311 738,311 
Pension liability adjustments, net of taxes of ($5,504)  (8,133)  (8,133)
Foreign currency translation adjustment 705 705 
Unrealized loss adjustment on marketable securities, net of taxes of ($56)  (104)  (104)
Net losses on outstanding derivatives, net of taxes of ($3,700)  (6,278)  (6,278)
Reclassification of net gain on derivatives into earnings  (612)  (612)
   
Comprehensive income 723,889 
Purchase of 6,376 shares of treasury stock  (1,123,655)  (1,123,655)
Retirement of treasury shares  (8,504)  (85)  (85,657)  (1,120,289) 1,206,031  
Sale of common stock under stock options and stock purchase plan 684 7 52,915 52,922 
Share-based compensation expense 19,120 19,120 
Income tax benefit from exercise of stock options 22,251 22,251 
Other  (301)  (11) 94  (218)
               
Balance at August 28, 2010 50,061 $501 $557,955 $(245,344) $(106,468) $(945,409) $(738,765)
               
See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

 

39


Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
Note A — Significant Accounting Policies
Business:AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries (“AutoZone” or the “Company”) is principally a retailer and distributor of automotive parts and accessories. At the end of fiscal 2008,2010, the Company operated 4,0924,389 domestic stores in the United States (“U.S.”) and Puerto Rico, and 148238 stores in Mexico. Each store carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products. ManyIn 2,424 of the domestic stores haveand 173 of the Mexico stores at the end of fiscal 2010, the Company had a commercial sales program that provides commercial credit and prompt delivery of parts and other products to local, regional and national repair garages, dealers, service stations, and service stations.public sector accounts. The Company also sells the ALLDATA brand automotive diagnostic and repair software. On the web at www.autozone.com,software through www.alldata.com. Additionally, the Company sells diagnosticautomotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories, and repair information, autonon-automotive products through www.autozone.com, and light truck parts, and accessories.as part of our commercial sales program, through www.autozonepro.com.
Fiscal Year:The Company’s fiscal year consists of 52 or 53 weeks ending on the last Saturday in August. Accordingly, fiscal 2010 represented 52 weeks ended on August 28, 2010, fiscal 2009 represented 52 weeks ended on August 29, 2009, and fiscal 2008 represented 53 weeks ended on August 30, 2008. Fiscal 2007 and fiscal 2006 represented 52 weeks ended on August 25, 2007 and August 26, 2006, respectively.
Basis of Presentation:The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of AutoZone, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates:Management of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities to prepare these financial statements. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Cash Equivalents:Cash equivalents consist of investments with original maturities of 90 days or less at the date of purchase. Cash equivalents include proceeds due from credit and debit card transactions with settlement terms of less than 5 days. Credit and debit card receivables included within cash equivalents were $22.7$29.6 million at August 30, 200828, 2010 and $24.3 million at August 25, 2007.29, 2009.
Marketable Securities:The Company invests a portion of its assets held by the Company’s wholly owned insurance captive in marketable debt securities. The Company accounts for these securities in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities” (“SFAS 115”) and accordingly, classifies them as available-for-sale. The Company includes these securities within the other current assets captionand other long-term assets captions in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and records the amounts at fair market value, which is determined using quoted market prices at the end of the reporting period. Unrealized gains and losses on theseA discussion of marketable securities are recordedis included in accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.“Note E — Fair Value Measurements” and “Note F — Marketable Securities”.
The Company’s available-for-sale financial instruments consisted of the following:
                 
  Amortized  Gross  Gross  Fair 
  Cost  Unrealized  Unrealized  Market 
(in thousands) Basis  Gains  Losses  Value 
                 
August 30, 2008 $58,517  $457  $(171) $58,803 
             
August 25, 2007 $57,245  $33  $(152) $57,126 
             
The debt securities held at August 30, 2008, had contractual maturities ranging from less than one year to approximately 3 years. The Company did not realize any material gains or losses on its marketable securities during fiscal 2008.

40


Accounts Receivable:Accounts receivable consists of receivables from commercial customers and vendors, and are presented net of an allowance for uncollectible accounts. AutoZone routinely grants credit to certain of its commercial customers. The risk of credit loss in its trade receivables is substantially mitigated by the Company’s credit evaluation process, short collection terms and sales to a large number of customers, as well as the low revenue per transaction for most of its sales. Allowances for potential credit losses are determined based on historical experience and current evaluation of the composition of accounts receivable. Historically, credit losses have been within management’s expectations and the allowances for uncollectible accounts were $16.3$1.4 million at August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $17.7$2.5 million at August 25, 2007. The Company routinely sells the majority of its29, 2009.
Historically, certain receivables were sold to a third party at a discount for cash with limited recourse. AutoZone has recorded a $1.2 million recourse reserve related toAt August 30, 2008, the Company had $55.4 million in outstanding factoredunder this program. During the second quarter of fiscal 2009, AutoZone terminated its agreement to sell receivables at August 30, 2008. The recourse reserve at August 25, 2007, was $1.8 million related to $55.3 million in outstanding factored receivables.a third party.
Merchandise Inventories:Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market using the last-in, first-out (LIFO) method.method for domestic inventories and the first-in, first out (“FIFO”) method for Mexico inventories. Included in inventory are related purchasing, storage and handling costs. Due to price deflation on the Company’s merchandise purchases, the Company’s domestic inventory balances are effectively maintained under the first-in, first-outFIFO method. The Company’s policy is not to write up inventory in excess of replacement cost, resulting in cost of sales being reflected at the higher amount.cost. The cumulative balance of this unrecorded adjustment, which will be reduced upon experiencing price inflation on our merchandise purchases, was $225.4$247.3 million at August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $227.9$223.0 million at August 25, 2007.29, 2009.

40


AutoZone has entered into pay-on-scan (“POS”) arrangements with certain vendors, whereby AutoZone will not purchase merchandise supplied by a vendor until that merchandise is ultimately sold to AutoZone’s customers. Title and certain risks of ownership remain with the vendor until the merchandise is sold to AutoZone’s customers. Since the Company does not own merchandise under POS arrangements until just before it is sold to a customer, such merchandise is not recorded in the Company’s balance sheet. Upon the sale of the merchandise to AutoZone’s customers, AutoZone recognizes the liability for the goods and pays the vendor in accordance with the agreed-upon terms. Although AutoZone does not hold title to the goods, AutoZone controls pricing and has credit collection risk and therefore, gross revenues under POS arrangements are included in net sales in the income statement. Sales of merchandise under POS arrangements approximated $38.2 million in fiscal 2008, $170.0 million in fiscal 2007, and $390.0 million in fiscal 2006. Merchandise under POS arrangements was $6.7 million at August 30, 2008 and $22.4 million at August 25, 2007.
Property and Equipment:Property and equipment is stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are computed principally using the straight-line method over the following estimated useful lives: buildings, 40 to 50 years; building improvements, 5 to 15 years; equipment, 3 to 10 years; and leasehold improvements, over the shorter of the asset’s estimated useful life or the remaining lease term, which includes any reasonably assured renewal periods. Depreciation and amortization include amortization of assets under capital lease.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets:In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets” (“SFAS 144”), theThe Company evaluates the recoverability of the carrying amounts of theits long-lived assets covered by this standard annually and more frequently ifwhenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. As part ofWhen such an event occurs, the evaluation, the Company reviews performance at the store level to identify any stores with current period operating losses that should be considered for impairment. The Company compares the sum of the undiscounted expected future cash flows of the asset (asset group) with the carrying amounts of the assets.asset. If impairmentsthe undiscounted expected future cash flows are indicated,less than the carrying value of the assets, the Company measures the amount of impairment loss as the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets is recognized as an impairment loss.assets. No impairment losses were recorded in the three years ended August 30, 2008.28, 2010.
Goodwill:The cost in excess of fair value of identifiable net assets of businesses acquired is recorded as goodwill. In accordance with the provisions of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, “Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets” (“SFAS 142”), goodwillGoodwill has not been amortized since fiscal 2001, but an analysis is performed at least annually to compare the fair value of the reporting unit to the carrying amount to determine if any impairment exists. The Company performs its annual impairment assessment in the fourth quarter of each fiscal year, unless circumstances dictate more frequent assessments. No impairment losses were recorded in the three years ended August 30, 2008.28, 2010. Goodwill was $302.6 million net of accumulated amortization of $51.2 million, as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and August 25, 2007.29, 2009.

41


Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities:AutoZone is exposed to market risk from, among other things, changes in interest rates, foreign exchange rates and fuel prices. From time to time, the Company uses various financial instruments to reduce such risks. To date, based upon the Company’s current level of foreign operations, hedging costs and past changes in the associated foreign exchange rates, no derivative instruments have been utilized to reduce foreign exchange rate risk. All of the Company’s hedging activities are governed by guidelines that are authorized by AutoZone’s Board of Directors. Further, the Company does not buy or sell financial instruments for trading purposes.
AutoZone’s financial market risk results primarily from changes in interest rates. At times, AutoZone reduces its exposure to changes in interest rates by entering into various interest rate hedge instruments such as interest rate swap contracts, treasury lock agreements and forward-starting interest rate swaps. The Company complies with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards Nos. 133, 137, 138 and 149 (collectively “SFAS 133”) pertaining to the accounting for these derivatives and hedging activities which require all such interest rate hedge instruments to be recorded on the balance sheet at fair value. All of the Company’s interest rate hedge instruments are designated as cash flow hedges. Refer to “Note E –H — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”Financial Instruments” for additional disclosures regarding the Company’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. Cash flows related to these instruments designated as qualifying hedges are reflected in the accompanying consolidated statements of cash flows in the same categories as the cash flows from the items being hedged. Accordingly, cash flows relating to the settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging the forecasted issuance of debt have been reflected upon settlement as a component of financing cash flows. The resulting gain or loss from such settlement is deferred to other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense over the term of the underlying debt. This reclassification of the deferred gains and losses impacts the interest expense recognized on the underlying debt that was hedged and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows in periods subsequent to settlement. The periodic settlement of interest rate derivatives hedging outstanding variable rate debt is recorded as an adjustment to interest expense and is therefore reflected as a component of operating cash flows.
Foreign Currency:The Company accounts for its Mexican operations using the Mexican peso as the functional currency and converts its financial statements from Mexican pesos to U.S. dollars in accordance with SFAS No. 52, “Foreign Currency Translation.”dollars. The cumulative loss on currency translation is recorded as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss and approximated $1.8$44.7 million at August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $15.8$45.5 million at August 25, 2007.29, 2009.
Self-Insurance Reserves:The Company retains a significant portion of the risks associated with workers’ compensation, employee health, general, products liability, property and automotivevehicle insurance. Through various methods, which include analyses of historical trends and utilization of actuaries, the Company estimates the costs of these risks. The costs are accrued based upon the aggregate of the liability for reported claims and an estimated liability for claims incurred but not reported. Estimates are based on calculations that consider historical lag and claim development factors. The long-term portions of these liabilities are recorded at our estimate of their net present value.

41


Deferred Rent:The Company recognizes rent expense on a straight-line basis over the course of the lease term, which includes any reasonably assured renewal periods, beginning on the date the Company takes physical possession of the property (see “Note J –M — Leases”). Differences between this calculated expense and cash payments are recorded as a liability in accrued expenses and other and other long-term liabilities onin the accompanying balance sheet. This deferredConsolidated Balance Sheets. Deferred rent approximated $51.0$67.6 million as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $42.6$59.2 million as of August 25, 2007.29, 2009.
Financial Instruments:The Company has financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, other current assets and accounts payable. The carrying amounts of these financial instruments approximate fair value because of their short maturities. A discussion of the carrying values and fair values of the Company’s debt is included in “Note F –I — Financing,” marketable securities is included in “Note A –F — Marketable Securities,” and derivatives is included in “Note E –H — Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.Financial Instruments.
Income Taxes:The Company accounts for income taxes under the liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on differences between financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities and are measured using the enacted tax rates and laws that will be in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. We measureOur effective tax rate is based on income by tax jurisdiction, statutory rates, and record income tax contingency accrualssaving initiatives available to us in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertaintythe various jurisdictions in Income Taxes”.which we operate.

42


We recognizeThe Company recognizes liabilities for uncertain income tax positions based on a two-step process. The first step is to evaluate the tax position for recognition by determining if the weight of available evidence indicates that it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained on audit, including resolution of related appeals or litigation processes, if any. The second step requires us to estimate and measure the tax benefit as the largest amount that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement. It is inherently difficult and subjective to estimate such amounts, as wethe Company must determine the probability of various possible outcomes. We reevaluateThe Company reevaluates these uncertain tax positions on a quarterly basis or when new information becomes available to management. These reevaluations are based on factors including, but not limited to, changes in facts or circumstances, changes in tax law, successfully settled issues under audit, expirations due to statutes, and new audit activity. Such a change in recognition or measurement could result in the recognition of a tax benefit or an increase to the tax accrual.
We classifyThe Company classifies interest related to income tax liabilities as income tax expense, and if applicable, penalties are recognized as a component of income tax expense. The income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties that are due within one year of the balance sheet date are presented as current liabilities.accrued expenses and other in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The remaining portion of ourthe income tax liabilities and accrued interest and penalties are presented as noncurrentother long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets because payment of cash is not anticipated within one year of the balance sheet date. These noncurrent income tax liabilities are recorded in the caption “Other liabilities” in our consolidated balance sheets.
Sales and Use Taxes:Governmental authorities assess sales and use taxes on the sale of goods and services. The Company excludes taxes collected from customers in its reported sales results; such amounts are reflected as accrued expenses and other until remitted to the taxing authorities.
Revenue Recognition:The Company recognizes sales at the time the sale is made and the product is delivered to the customer. Revenue from sales are presented net of allowances for estimated sales returns, which are based on historical return rates.
A portion of the Company’s transactions include the sale of auto parts that contain a core component. The core component represents the recyclable portion of the auto part. Customers are not charged for the core component of the new part if a used core is returned at the point of sale of the new part; otherwise the Company charges customers a specified amount for the core component. The Company refunds that same amount upon the customer returning a used core to the store at a later date. The Company does not recognize sales or cost of sales for the core component of these transactions when a used part is returned or expected to be returned from the customer.
Vendor Allowances and Advertising Costs:The Company receives various payments and allowances from its vendors through a variety of programs and arrangements. Monies received from vendors include rebates, allowances and promotional funds. The amounts to be received are subject to purchase volumes and the terms of the vendor agreements, which generally do not state an expiration date, but are subject to ongoing negotiations that may be impacted in the future based on changes in market conditions, vendor marketing strategies and changes in the profitability or sell-through of the related merchandise.

42


Rebates and other miscellaneous incentives are earned based on purchases or product sales and are accrued ratably over the purchase or sale of the related product, but only if it is reasonably certain that the required volume levels will be reached.product. These monies are generally recorded as a reduction of inventories and are recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventories are sold.
Allowances and promotional funds earned under vendor funding programs are accounted for pursuant to the Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 02-16, “Accounting by a Customer (Including a Reseller) for Cash Consideration Received from a Vendor” (“EITF 02-16”). The majority of the vendor funds received is recorded as a reduction of the cost of inventories and is recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as these inventories are sold. For arrangements that provide for reimbursement of specific, incremental, identifiable costs incurred by the Company in selling the vendors’ products, the vendor funds are recorded as a reduction to selling, general and administrative expenses in the period in which the specific costs were incurred.
Advertising expense was approximately $89.0 million in fiscal 2008, $85.9 million in fiscal 2007, and $78.1 million in fiscal 2006. The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising expense, net of vendor promotional funds, was $65.5 million in fiscal 2010, $72.1 million in fiscal 2009, and $86.2 million in fiscal 2008. Vendor promotional funds, which reduced advertising expense, amounted to $19.6 million in fiscal 2010, $9.7 million in fiscal 2009, and $2.9 in fiscal 2008.

43

Cost of Sales and Operating, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses:The following illustrates the primary costs classified in each major expense category:


Cost of Sales
Total cost of merchandise sold, including:
Freight expenses associated with moving merchandise inventories from the Company’s vendors to the distribution centers and to the retail stores
Vendor allowances that are not reimbursements for specific, incremental and identifiable costs
Costs associated with operating the Company’s supply chain, including payroll and benefit costs, warehouse occupancy costs, transportation costs and depreciation
Inventory shrinkage
Operating, Selling, General and Administrative Expenses
Payroll and benefit costs for store and store support employees;
Occupancy costs of store and store support facilities;
Depreciation related to retail and store support assets;
Transportation costs associated with commercial deliveries;
Advertising;
Self insurance costs; and
Other administrative costs, such as credit card transaction fees, supplies, and travel and lodging
Warranty Costs:The Company or the vendors supplying its products provide itsprovides the Company’s customers limited warranties on certain products that range from 30 days to lifetime warranties.lifetime. In most cases, the Company’s vendors are primarily responsible for warranty claims. Warranty costs relating to merchandise sold under warranty not covered by vendors are estimated and recorded as warranty obligations at the time of sale based on each product’s historical return rate. These obligations, which are often funded by vendor allowances, are recorded as a component of accrued expenses. For vendor allowances that are in excess of the related estimated warranty expense for the vendor’s products, the excess is recorded in inventory and recognized as a reduction to cost of sales as the related inventory is sold.
Shipping and Handling Costs:The Company does not generally charge customers separately for shipping and handling. Substantially all the costcosts the Company incurs to ship products to our stores isare included in cost of sales.
Pre-opening Expenses:Pre-opening expenses, which consist primarily of payroll and occupancy costs, are expensed as incurred.
Earnings Perper Share:Basic earnings per share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares. Diluted earnings per share is based on the weighted average outstanding common shares adjusted for the effect of common stock equivalents, which are primarily stock options. StockThere were no stock options that were not included inexcluded from the diluted earnings per share computation because they would have been anti-dilutive at August 28, 2010. There were approximately 30,000 shares excluded at August 29, 2009, and approximately 31,000 shares excluded at August 30, 2008, 8,000 shares at August 25, 2007, and 700,000 shares at August 26, 2006.2008.

43


Stock Options:Share-Based Payments:At August 30, 2008, the Company hadShare-based payments include stock option plans that provide for the purchase ofgrants and certain other transactions under the Company’s common stock by certain of its employees and directors. Effective August 28, 2005, theplans. The Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123(R) “Share-Based Payment” (“SFAS 123(R)”) and began recognizingrecognizes compensation expense for its share-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. See “Note B Share-Based Payments” for further discussion.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements:On August 26, 2007, we adoptedIn October 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Interpretationissued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2009-13,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables, which amends Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 605 (formerly Emerging Issues Task Force Issue No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes” (“FIN 48”00-21,Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables). This interpretation establishes new standardsASU addresses the accounting for multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements to enable vendors to account for deliverables separately rather than as a combined unit. This ASU will be effective prospectively for revenue arrangements entered into commencing with the financial statement recognition, measurement and disclosure of uncertain tax positions taken or expected to be taken in income tax returns. For additional information onCompany’s first fiscal quarter beginning August 29, 2010. The Company does not expect the impact of adoption of FIN 48, refer to “Note D – Income Taxes” to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
On August 25, 2007, we adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of FASB Statement No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires recognition in the balance sheet of the funded status of defined benefit pension and other postretirement plans, and the recognition in accumulated other comprehensive income (“AOCI”) of unrecognized gains or losses and prior service costs or credits. The funded status is measured as the difference between the fair value of the plan’s assets and the projected benefit obligation (“PBO”) of the plan. Refer to “Note I – Pension and Savings Plans” for further description of this adoption.
Additionally, SFAS 158 requires the measurement date for plan assets and liabilities to coincide with the sponsor’s year end. We currently use a May 31 measurement date for our plans; therefore, this standard will require us to change our measurement date to our fiscal year end beginning in fiscal 2009. The impact from adopting the measurement provisions is not expectedASU 2009-13 to have a material impacteffect on the Company’s results of operations. For additional information on the adoption of SFAS 158, refer to Note I to the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In September 2006, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (“SFAS 157”). This new standard defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 will be effective at the beginning of fiscal 2009 for financial assets and liabilities and at the beginning of fiscal 2010 for non-financial assets and liabilities. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have an immediate material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

44


In February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (“SFAS 159”). This new standard permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value. SFAS 159 will be effective for AutoZone in fiscal 2009. The adoption of this statement is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements because we do not currently intend to elect to apply fair value to any financial instruments that are not already reported at fair value.
In December 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement 141R, “Business Combinations,” (“SFAS 141R”). This standard significantly changes the accounting for and reporting of business combinations in consolidated financial statements. Among other things, SFAS 141R requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed at the acquisition date and requires the expensing of most transaction and restructuring costs. The standard is effective for us beginning August 30, 2009 (fiscal 2010) and is applicable only to transactions occurring after the effective date.
In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, “Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, including an amendment for ARB No. 51,” (“SFAS 160”).  SFAS 160 amends ARB No. 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary.  It clarifies that a noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary is an ownership interest in the consolidated entity that should be reported as equity in the consolidated financial statements.  SFAS 160 is effective for us beginning August 30, 2009. The adoption of SFAS 160 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities, an amendment of SFAS No. 133,” (“SFAS 161”).  SFAS 161 amends SFAS No. 133 to change the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities.  Entities are required to provide enhanced disclosures about how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for under SFAS No. 133 and its related interpretations, and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows.  SFAS 161 is effective for AutoZone beginning in fiscal 2010. We are currently evaluating the provisions of SFAS 161.
In May 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 162, “The Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles,” (“SFAS 162”).   SFAS 162 identifies the sources of accounting principles and the framework for selecting the principles to be used in the preparation of financial statements of nongovernmental entities that are presented in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) in the United States.  SFAS No. 162 is effective 60 days after the SEC’s approval of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board amendments to AU section 411.  
Note B — Share-Based Payments
Effective August 28, 2005, the Company adopted SFAS 123(R) and began recognizing compensation expense for its share-based payments based on the fair value of the awards. Share-based payments include stock option grants and certain transactions under the Company’s other stock plans.
In accordance with SFAS 123(R),Total share-based compensation expense is based on the following: a) grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS 123 for unvested options granted prior to the adoption date; b) grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R) for options granted subsequent to the adoption date; and c) the discount on shares sold to employees post-adoption, which represents the difference between the grant date fair value and the employee purchase price.
Total share-based expense (a component of operating, selling, general and administrative expenses) was $18.4$19.1 million related to stock options and share purchase plans for fiscal 2008, $18.52010, $19.1 million for fiscal 20072009, and $17.4$18.4 million for fiscal 2008. As of August 28, 2010, share-based compensation expense for unvested awards not yet recognized in fiscal 2006.earnings is $16.9 million and will be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.5 years. Tax deductions in excess of recognized compensation cost are classified as a financing cash inflow in accordance with SFAS 123(R).

45


Under SFAS 123(R), forfeitures are estimated at the time of valuation and reduce expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.inflow.
AutoZone grants options to purchase common stock to certain of its employees and directors under various plans at prices equal to the market value of the stock on the date of grant. Options have a term of 10 years or 10 years and one day from grant date. Director options generally vest three years from grant date. Employee options generally vest in equal annual installments on the first, second, third and fourth anniversaries of the grant date. Employees and directors generally have 30 days after the service relationship ends, or one year after death, to exercise all vested options. The fair value of each option grant is separately estimated for each vesting date. The fair value of each option is amortized into compensation expense on a straight-line basis between the grant date for the award and each vesting date. The Company has estimated the fair value of all stock option awards as of the date of the grant by applying the Black-Scholes-Merton multiple-option pricing valuation model. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and highly sensitive in the determination of compensation expense.
The following table presents the weighted average for key assumptions used in determining the fair value of options granted and a summarythe related share-based compensation expense:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 28,  August 29,  August 30, 
  2010  2009  2008 
             
Expected price volatility  31%  28%  24%
Risk-free interest rates  1.8%  2.4%  4.1%
Weighted average expected lives in years  4.3   4.1   4.0 
Forfeiture rate  10%  10%  10%
Dividend yield  0%  0%  0%
The following methodologies were applied in developing the assumptions used in determining the fair value of the methodology applied to develop each assumption are as follows:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 30,  August 25,  August 26, 
  2008  2007  2006 
             
Expected price volatility  24%  26%  35%
Risk-free interest rates  4.1%  4.6%  4.1%
Weighted average expected lives in years  4.0   3.9   3.3 
Forfeiture rate  10%  10%  10%
Dividend yield  0%  0%  0%
options granted:
Expected Price Volatility price volatility—This is a measure of the amount by which a price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The Company uses actual historical changes in the market value of our stock to calculate the volatility assumption as it is management’s belief that this is the best indicator of future volatility. We calculate daily market value changes from the date of grant over a past period representative of the expected life of the options to determine volatility. An increase in the expected volatility will increase compensation expense.

44


Risk-Free Interest Rate Risk-free interest rate—This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the week of the grant having a term equal to the expected life of the option. An increase in the risk-free interest rate will increase compensation expense.
Expected Lives lives—This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding and is based on historical experience. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for valuation purposes. Options granted have a maximum term of ten years or ten years and one day. An increase in the expected life will increase compensation expense.
Forfeiture Rate rate—This is the estimated percentage of options granted that are expected to be forfeited or canceled before becoming fully vested. This estimate is based on historical experience.experience at the time of valuation and reduces expense ratably over the vesting period. An increase in the forfeiture rate will decrease compensation expense. This estimate is evaluated periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.
Dividend Yield yield—The Company has not made any dividend payments nor does it have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future. An increase in the dividend yield will decrease compensation expense.

46


The Company generally issues new shares when options are exercised. A summary of outstanding stock options is as follows:
         
      Weighted 
      Average 
  Number  Exercise 
  of Shares  Price 
         
Outstanding August 25, 2007  2,956,765  $79.24 
Granted  666,480   116.01 
Exercised  (450,425)  62.01 
Canceled  (71,583)  88.93 
       
Outstanding August 30, 2008  3,101,237  $89.42 
       
The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding at August 30, 2008:
                     
  Options Outstanding  Options Exercisable 
          Weighted        
          Average        
      Weighted  Remaining      Weighted 
      Average  Contractual      Average 
Range of Exercise Number  Exercise  Life  Number  Exercise 
Prices Outstanding  Price  (in Years)  Exercisable  Price 
                     
$22.00 - $75.64  882,159  $62.55   4.34   741,495  $60.07 
$82.00 - $89.18  828,399   85.23   6.18   565,828   86.67 
$89.30 - $103.44  694,699   101.48   7.84   204,653   99.67 
$112.83 - $116.35  627,350   115.41   9.02       
$117.20 - $137.09  68,630   125.80   9.15   5,000   129.63 
                
$22.00 - $137.09  3,101,237  $89.42   6.68   1,516,976  $75.56 
                
At August 30, 2008, the aggregate intrinsic value of all outstanding options was $148 million with a weighted average remaining contractual term of 6.7 years, of which 1,516,976 of the outstanding options are currently exercisable with an aggregate intrinsic value of $93.5 million, a weighted average exercise price of $75.56 and a weighted average remaining contractual term of 5.1 years. Shares reserved for future option grants approximated 4.0 million at August 30, 2008. The weighted average grant date fair value of options granted was $40.75 during fiscal 2010, $34.06 during fiscal 2009, and $30.28 during fiscal 2008, $29.04 during fiscal 2007 and $22.86 during fiscal 2006.2008. The intrinsic value of options exercised was $65 million in fiscal 2010, $29 million in fiscal 2008, $472009, and $29 million in fiscal 2007 and $272008. The total fair value of options vested was $21 million in fiscal 2006.2010, $16 million in fiscal 2009 and $18 million in fiscal 2008.
The Company generally issues new shares when options are exercised. The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the year ended August 28, 2010:
                 
          Weighted-    
          Average    
      Weighted  Remaining    
      Average  Contractual  Aggregate 
  Number  Exercise  Term  Intrinsic Value 
  of Shares  Price  ( in years)  (in thousands) 
                 
Outstanding — August 29, 2009  3,095,352  $98.73         
Granted  496,580   143.49         
Exercised  (683,548)  79.08         
Canceled  (34,178)  116.49         
                
Outstanding — August 28, 2010  2,874,206   110.93   6.48  $298,115 
                
Exercisable  1,509,720   94.12   5.08   181,970 
                
Expected to vest  1,228,037   129.53   8.03   104,531 
                
Available for future grants  3,194,942             
                
Under the AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan, a non-employee director may receive no more than one-half of their director fees immediately in cash, and the remainder of the fees must be taken in common stock. The director may elect to receive up to 100% of the fees in stock or defer all or part of the fees in units (“Director Units”) with value equivalent to the value of shares of common stock as of the grant date. At August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the Company has $3.2$4.1 million accrued related to 23,424 director units19,228 Director Units issued under the current and prior plans with 81,99676,415 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under the current plan. At August 29, 2009, the Company has $2.6 million accrued related to 17,506 Director Units issued under the current and prior plans.
Under the AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan (the “Director Stock Option Plan”), each non-employee director receives an option grant on January 1 of each year, and each new non-employee director receives an option to purchase 3,000 shares upon election to the Board of Directors, plus a portion of the annual directors’ option grant prorated for the portion of the year actually served in office. Under the Director Compensation Program, effective January 1, 2008 each non-employee director may choose between two pay options, and the number of stock options a director receives under the Director Stock Option Plan depends on which pay option the director

45


chooses. Directors who elect to be paid only the Base Retainer willbase retainer receive, on January 1 during their first two years of services as a director, an option to purchase 3,000 shares of AutoZone common stock. After the first two years, such directors will receive, on January 1 of each year, an option to purchase 1,500 shares of common stock, and each such director who owns common stock or Director Units worth at least five times the Base Retainer willbase retainer receive an additional option to purchase 1,500 shares. Directors electing to be paid a Supplemental Retainersupplemental retainer in addition to the Base Retainer willbase retainer receive, on January 1 during their first two years of service as a director, an option to purchase 2,000 shares of AutoZone common stock. After the first two years, such directors will receive an option to purchase 500 shares of common stock, and each such director who owns common stock or StockDirector Units worth at least five times the Base Retainer willbase retainer receive an additional option to purchase 1,500 shares. These stock option grants are made at the fair market value as of the grant date. At August 30, 2008,28, 2010, there were 123,604are 137,016 outstanding options with 259,896210,484 shares of common stock reserved for future issuance under this plan.

47


The Company recognized $0.7$1.0 million in expense related to the discount on the selling of shares to employees and executives under various share purchase plans in fiscal 2008 and $1.12010, $0.9 million in the prior year.fiscal 2009 and $0.7 million in fiscal 2008. The employee stock purchase plan, which is qualified under Section 423 of the Internal Revenue Code, permits all eligible employees to purchase AutoZone’s common stock at 85% of the lower of the market price of the common stock on the first day or last day of each calendar quarter through payroll deductions. Maximum permitted annual purchases are $15,000 per employee or 10 percent of compensation, whichever is less. Under the plan, 26,620 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2010, 29,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2009, and 36,147 shares were sold to employees in fiscal 2008, 39,1392008. The Company repurchased 30,617 shares were sold to employeesat fair value in fiscal 2007, and 51,1672010, 37,190 shares were soldat fair value in fiscal 2006. The Company repurchased2009, and 39,235 shares at fair value in fiscal 2008 65,152 shares at fair value in fiscal 2007, and 62,293 shares at fair value in fiscal 2006 from employees electing to sell their stock. Issuances of shares under the employee stock purchase plans are netted against repurchases and such repurchases are not included in share repurchases disclosed in “Note HK — Stock Repurchase Program.” At August 30, 2008, 349,75028, 2010, 293,983 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan. Once executives have reached the maximum under the employee stock purchase plan, the Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan permits all eligible executives to purchase AutoZone’s common stock up to 25 percent of his or her annual salary and bonus. Purchases under this plan were 1,483 shares in fiscal 2010, 1,705 shares in fiscal 2009, and 1,793 shares in fiscal 2008, 1,257 shares in fiscal 2007, and 811 shares in fiscal 2006.2008. At August 30, 2008, 261,24428, 2010, 258,056 shares of common stock were reserved for future issuance under this plan.
On December 13, 2006, stockholders approved the AutoZone, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan and the AutoZone, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan. There have been no other material modifications to the Company’s stock plans during fiscal 2008, 2007, or 2006.
Note C — Accrued Expenses and Other
Accrued expenses and other consisted of the following:
                
 August 30, August 25,  August 28, August 29, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007  2010 2009 
  
Medical and casualty insurance claims (current portion) $55,270 $52,037  $60,955 $65,024 
Accrued compensation, related payroll taxes and benefits 98,054 101,467  134,830 121,192 
Property and sales taxes 69,443 61,570 
Property, sales, and other taxes 102,364 92,065 
Accrued interest 26,375 22,241  31,091 32,448 
Accrued gift cards 22,013 16,337 
Accrued sales and warranty returns 9,983 8,634  14,679 12,432 
Capital lease obligations 15,917 16,015  21,947 16,735 
Other 52,622 45,669  44,489 25,038 
          
 $327,664 $307,633  $432,368 $381,271 
          
The Company retains a significant portion of the insurance risks associated with workers’ compensation, employee health, general, products liability, property and automotivevehicle insurance. Beginning in fiscal 2004, aA portion of these self-insured losses is managed through a wholly owned insurance captive. The Company maintains certain levels for stop-loss coverage for each self-insured plan in order to limit its liability for large claims. The limits are per claim and are $1.5 million for workers’ compensation and property, $0.5 million for employee health, and $1.0 million for general, products liability, and automotive.vehicle.

 

4846


Note D — Income Taxes
The provision for income tax expense consisted of the following:
                        
 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 August 30, August 25, August 26,  August 28, August 29, August 30, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007 2006  2010 2009 2008 
  
Current:  
Federal $285,516 $292,166 $272,916  $397,062 $303,929 $285,516 
State 20,516 23,468 23,539  34,155 26,450 20,516 
              
 306,032 315,634 296,455  431,217 330,379 306,032 
 
Deferred:  
Federal 51,997 22,878 30,065   (3,831) 46,809 51,997 
State 7,754 1,966 6,241   (5,192)  (491) 7,754 
              
 59,751 24,844 36,306   (9,023) 46,318 59,751 
              
Income tax expense $422,194 $376,697 $365,783 
 $365,783 $340,478 $332,761        
       
A reconciliation of the provision for income taxes to the amount computed by applying the federal statutory tax rate of 35% to income before income taxes is as follows:
                        
 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 August 30, August 25, August 26,  August 28, August 29, August 30, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007 2006  2010 2009 2008 
  
Federal tax at statutory U.S. income tax rate $352,586 $327,653 $315,713   35.0%  35.0%  35.0%
State income taxes, net 18,375 16,532 19,357   1.6%  1.6%  1.8%
Other  (5,178)  (3,707)  (2,309)  (0.2%)  (0.2%)  (0.5%)
              
Effective tax rate  36.4%  36.4%  36.3%
 $365,783 $340,478 $332,761        
       
Significant components of the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities were as follows:
                
 August 30, August 25,  August 28, August 29, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007  2010 2009 
 
Net deferred tax assets: 
Deferred tax assets: 
Domestic net operating loss and credit carryforwards $20,259 $18,573  $25,781 $23,119 
Foreign net operating loss and credit carryforwards 4,857 6,257   1,369 
Insurance reserves 7,933 13,683  20,400 14,769 
Derivatives 1,502  
Accrued benefits 27,991 20,750  50,991 32,976 
Pension 34,965 26,273 
Other 37,702 15,640�� 34,764 35,836 
          
Total deferred tax assets 100,244 74,903  166,901 134,342 
Less: Valuation allowances  (7,551)  (8,154)  (7,085)  (7,116)
          
Net deferred tax assets 92,693 66,749 
 159,816 127,226 
      
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Property and equipment 24,186 8,296   (35,714)  (36,472)
Inventory 149,318 103,233   (205,000)  (192,715)
Derivatives  2,068 
Pension 1,620 2,369 
Prepaid expenses 13,658 10,192 
Other 2,431 1,412   (19,850)  (14,840)
          
Deferred tax liabilities 191,213 127,570 
       (260,564)  (244,027)
Net deferred tax liabilities $(98,520) $(60,821)
          
Net deferred tax liability $(100,748) $(116,801)
     
Deferred taxes are not provided for temporary differences of approximately $67.7$91.1 million at August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $47.4$47.1 million atof August 25, 2007,29, 2009, representing earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries that are intended to be permanently reinvested. Computation of the potential deferred tax liability associated with these undistributed earnings and other basis differences is not practicable.

 

4947


At August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company had deferred tax assets of $8.6$8.2 million and $9.1$8.4 million from federal tax operating losses (“NOLs”) of $24.6$23.4 million and $25.9$24.0 million, and deferred tax assets of $1.5$1.6 million and $1.8$1.3 million from state tax NOLs of $32.8$35.5 million and $51.3$24.6 million, respectively. At August 30, 2008, and28, 2010, the Company had no deferred tax assets from Non-U.S. NOLs. At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company had deferred tax assets of $3.8 million and $3.1$1.3 million from Non-U.S. NOLs of $9.7 million and $7.9 million, respectively.$3.3 million. The federal state, and Non-U.S.state NOLs expire between fiscal 20092011 and fiscal 2028.2025. At August 30, 2008,28, 2010 and August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company had a valuation allowance of $7.0$6.8 million and $7.2$6.8 million, respectively, for certain federal and state NOLs resulting primarily from annual statutory usage limitations. At August 30, 2008,28, 2010 and August 29, 2009, the Company had deferred tax assets of $11.2$16.0 million and $13.5 million, respectively, for federal, state, and Non-U.S. income tax credit carryforwards. Certain tax credit carryforwards have no expiration date and others will expire in fiscal 20092011 through fiscal 2030. At August 30, 2008,28, 2010 and August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company had a valuation allowance of $0.5$0.3 million and $1.0$0.3 million for credits subject to such expiration periods, respectively.
AutoZone adopted Financial ASC Topic 740 (formerly FASB Statement No. 109,Accounting Standards Boardfor Income Taxes, and FASB Interpretation No. 48, “AccountingAccounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes,” (“FIN 48”Uncertain Tax Positions — an Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109) on August 26, 2007. FIN 48 prescribes a recognition threshold that a tax position is required to meet before being recognized in the financial statements and provides guidance on derecognition, measurement, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition issues. The adoption of FIN 48portions of ASC Topic 740 resulted in a decrease to the beginning balance of retained earnings of $26.9 million at the date of adoption.during fiscal 2008. Including this cumulative effect amount, the liability recorded for total unrecognized tax benefits upon adoption at August 26, 2007, was $49.2 million.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:
        
     August 28, August 29, 
(in thousands)  2010 2009 
Balance at August 26, 2007 $49,240 
 
Beginning balance $44,192 $40,759 
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year 6,181  16,802 5,511 
Additions for tax positions of prior years 65  2,125 9,567 
Reductions for tax positions of prior years  (8,890)  (6,390)  (5,679)
Reductions due to settlements  (3,201)  (16,354)  (2,519)
Reductions due to statue of limitations  (2,636)  (1,821)  (3,447)
        
Balance at August 30, 2008 $40,759 
Ending balance $38,554 $44,192 
        
Included in the August 30, 2008,28, 2010, balance is $26.5$16.7 million of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate.
The Company accrues interest on unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax expense. Penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense. Upon adoption of FIN 48, theThe Company had approximately $16.3$7.9 million and $12.4 million accrued for the payment of such accrued interest and penalties included in accrued liabilities associated with unrecognized tax benefits and has a balance at August 30, 2008, of approximately $15 million.28, 2010 and August 29, 2009, respectively.
The major jurisdictions where the Company files income tax returns are the United StatesU.S. and Mexico. Generally,With few exceptions, tax returns filed for tax years 20032006 through 20072009 remain open and subject to examination by the relevant tax authorities. The Company is typically engaged in various tax examinations at any given time, both by U. S.U.S. federal and state taxing jurisdictions and Mexican tax authorities. As of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the Company estimates that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits could be reduced by approximately $10$23.1 million over the next 12twelve months as a result of tax audit closings, settlements, and the expiration of statutes to examine such returns in various jurisdictions. While the Company believes that it has adequately accrued for possible audit adjustments, the final resolution of these examinations cannot be determined at this time and could result in final settlements that differ from current estimates.

48


Note E — Derivative Instruments and Hedging ActivitiesFair Value Measurements
AutoZoneEffective August 31, 2008, the Company adopted ASC Topic 820 (formerly FASB Statement No. 157,Fair Value Measurements)which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and expands disclosure requirements about fair value measurements. This standard defines fair value as the price received to transfer an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC Topic 820 establishes a framework for measuring fair value by creating a hierarchy of valuation inputs used to measure fair value, and although it does not require additional fair value measurements, it applies to other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
The hierarchy prioritizes the inputs into three broad levels:
Level 1 inputs— unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has utilizedthe ability to access. An active market for the asset or liability is one in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide ongoing pricing information.
Level 2 inputs— inputs other than quoted market prices included in Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for the asset or liability. Level 2 inputs include, but are not limited to, quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active and inputs other than quoted market prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rate curves and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals, volatilities, credit risk and default rates.
Level 3 inputs— unobservable inputs for the asset or liability.
The Company’s assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:
                 
  August 28, 2010 
(in thousands) Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Fair Value 
                 
Other current assets $11,307  $4,996  $  $16,303 
Other long-term assets  47,725   8,673      56,398 
Accrued expenses and other     9,979      9,979 
             
  $59,032  $23,648  $  $82,680 
             
                 
  August 29, 2009 
(in thousands) Level 1  Level 2  Level 3  Fair Value 
                 
Other current assets $11,915  $  $  $11,915 
Other long-term assets  58,123         58,123 
             
  $70,038  $  $  $70,038 
             
At August 28, 2010, the fair value measurement amounts for assets and liabilities recorded in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet consisted of short-term marketable securities of $16.3 million, which are included within other current assets, long-term marketable securities of $56.4 million, which are included in other long-term assets, and cash flow hedging instruments of $10.0 million, which are included within accrued expenses and other. The Company’s marketable securities are typically valued at the closing price in the principal active market as of the last business day of the quarter or through the use of other market inputs relating to the securities, including benchmark yields and reported trades. Reference “Note H — Derivative Financial Instruments” for further information on how the Company’s cash flow hedges are valued.
The fair value of the Company’s debt is disclosed in “Note I — Financing” and the fair value of the Company’s pension plan assets are disclosed in “Note L — Pension and Savings Plans”.

49


Note F — Marketable Securities
The Company’s basis for determining the cost of a security sold is the “Specific Identification Model”. Unrealized gains (losses) on marketable securities are recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss. The Company’s available-for-sale marketable securities consisted of the following:
                 
  August 28, 2010 
  Amortized  Gross  Gross    
  Cost  Unrealized  Unrealized    
(in thousands) Basis  Gains  Losses  Fair Value 
                 
Corporate securities $28,707  $490  $(1) $29,196 
Government bonds  24,560   283      24,843 
Mortgage-backed securities  8,603   192      8,795 
Asset-backed securities and other  9,831   47   (11)  9,867 
             
  $71,701  $1,012  $(12) $72,701 
             
                 
  August 29, 2009 
  Amortized  Gross  Gross    
  Cost  Unrealized  Unrealized    
(in thousands) Basis  Gains  Losses  Fair Value 
                 
Corporate securities $28,302  $654  $(5) $28,951 
Government bonds  18,199   283      18,482 
Mortgage-backed securities  14,772   366   (119)  15,019 
Asset-backed securities and other  7,589   207   (210)  7,586 
             
  $68,862  $1,510  $(334) $70,038 
             
The debt securities held at August 28, 2010, had effective maturities ranging from less than one year to approximately 3 years. The Company did not realize any material gains or losses on its marketable securities during fiscal 2010.
The Company holds two securities that are in an unrealized loss position of approximately $12 thousand at August 28, 2010. The Company has the intent and ability to hold these investments until recovery of fair value or maturity, and does not deem the investments to be impaired on an other than temporary basis. In evaluating whether the securities are deemed to be impaired on an other than temporary basis, the Company considers factors such as the duration and severity of the loss position, the credit worthiness of the investee, the term to maturity and our intent and ability to hold the investments until maturity or until recovery of fair value.
Note G — Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
Accumulated other comprehensive loss includes certain adjustments to pension liabilities, foreign currency translation adjustments, certain activity for interest rate swaps to convert variable rate debt to fixed rate debt and to lock in fixed rates on future debt issuances. AutoZone reflects the current fair value of all interest rate hedge instruments in its consolidated balance sheets as a component of other assets. All of the Company’s interest rate hedge instruments are designatedthat qualify as cash flow hedges. The Company had an outstanding interest rate swap with a fair value of ($4.3) million at August 30, 2008hedges and $5.8 million at August 25, 2007, to effectively fix the interest rateunrealized gains (losses) on the $300.0 million term loan entered into during December 2004.
The related gains and losses on interest rate hedges are deferred in stockholders’ equity as a component of other comprehensive income or loss. These deferred gains and losses are recognized in income as a decrease or increase to interest expense in the period in which the related cash flows being hedged are recognized in expense. However, to the extent that the change in value of an interest rate hedge instrument does not perfectly offset the change in the value of the cash flows being hedged, that ineffective portion is immediately recognized in income. The Company’s hedge instruments have been determined to be highly effective as of August 30, 2008.available-for-sale securities.

 

50


The following table summarizes the fiscal 2008 and 2007 activityChanges in accumulated other comprehensive loss consisted of the following:
                         
          Unrealized          
          Loss (Gain)  Net Loss  Reclassification    
  Pension  Foreign  on  (Gain) on  of Net Gains on  Accumulated 
  Liability  Currency  Marketable  Outstanding  Derivatives into  Other 
  Adjustments,  Translation  Securities,  Derivatives,  Earnings, net of  Comprehensive 
(in thousands) net of taxes  Adjustments  net of taxes  net of taxes  taxes  Loss 
Balance at August 30, 2008 $4,270  $1,798  $(186) $2,744  $(4,491) $4,135 
Fiscal 2009 activity  46,945   43,655   (568)  (2,744)  612   87,900 
                   
Balance at August 29, 2009  51,215   45,453   (754)     (3,879)  92,035 
Fiscal 2010 activity  8,144   (705)  104   6,278   612   14,433 
                   
Balance at August 28, 2010 $59,359  $44,748  $(650) $6,278  $(3,267) $106,468 
                   
The fiscal 2009 pension adjustment of $46.9 million reflects actuarial losses not yet reflected in the periodic pension cost caused primarily by the significant losses on pension assets in fiscal 2009. The foreign currency translation adjustment of $43.7 million during fiscal 2009 was attributable to the weakening of the Mexican Peso against the US Dollar, which as it relatesof August 29, 2009, had decreased by approximately 30% when compared to interest rate hedge instruments:August 30, 2008.
             
  Before-Tax  Income  After-Tax 
(in thousands) Amount  Tax  Amount 
             
Accumulated net gains as of August 26, 2006 $15,910  $(3,741) $12,169 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives  (4,440)  1,627   (2,813)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (612)     (612)
          
Accumulated net gains as of August 25, 2007  10,858   (2,114)  8,744 
Net losses on outstanding derivatives  (10,113)  3,715   (6,398)
Reclassification of net gains on derivatives into earnings  (598)     (598)
          
Accumulated net gains as of August 30, 2008 $147  $1,601  $1,748 
          
Note H — Derivative Financial Instruments
Cash Flow Hedges
The Company primarily executes derivativeperiodically uses derivatives to hedge exposures to interest rates. The Company does not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. For transactions of relatively short duration with strong creditworthy counterparties. These counterparties exposethat meet the hedge accounting criteria, the Company formally designates and documents the instrument as a hedge at inception and quarterly thereafter assesses the hedges to credit riskensure they are effective in offsetting changes in the eventcash flows of non-performance. The amount of such exposure is limited to the unpaidunderlying exposures. Derivatives are recorded in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet at fair value, determined using available market information or other appropriate valuation methodologies. In accordance with ASC Topic 815 (formerly FASB Statement No. 133,Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activitiesand FASB Statement No. 161,Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities), the effective portion of amounts due to the Company pursuant to the terms of the derivativea financial instruments, if any. Although there are no collateral requirements, if a downgradeinstrument’s change in the credit rating of these counterparties occurs, management believes that this exposurefair value is mitigated by provisions in the derivative agreements which allow for the legal right of offset of any amounts due to the Company from the counterparties with amounts payable, if any, to the counterparties by the Company. Management considers the risk of counterparty default to be minimal.
As of August 30, 2008, the Company estimates $600,000 of gains currently includedrecorded in accumulated other comprehensive incomeloss for derivatives that quality as cash flow hedges and any ineffective portion of an instrument’s change in fair value is recognized in earnings.
At August 28, 2010, the Company held two forward starting swaps, each with a notional amount of $150 million. These agreements, which expire in November 2010, are cash flow hedges used to hedge the exposure to variability in future cash flows resulting from changes in variable interest rates relating to anticipated debt transactions. The fixed rates of the hedges are 3.15% and 3.13% and are benchmarked based on the 3-month London InterBank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”). It is expected that upon settlement of the agreements, the realized gain or loss will be deferred in accumulated other comprehensive loss and reclassified to interest expense over the life of the underlying debt.
At August 28, 2010, the Company had $6.3 million, net of tax, recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to net unrealized losses associated with these derivatives. For the fiscal year ended August 28, 2010, the Company’s forward starting swaps were determined to be reclassedhighly effective, and no ineffective portion was recognized in earnings. The fair values of the interest rate hedge instruments at August 28, 2010 was a liability of $10.0 million recorded within the accrued expenses and other caption in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheet.
During 2009, the Company was party to an interest rate swap agreement related to its $300 million term floating rate loan, which bore interest based on the three month LIBOR and matured in December 2009. Under this agreement, which was accounted for as a cash flow hedge, the interest rate on the term loan was effectively fixed for its entire term at 4.4% and effectiveness was measured each reporting period. During August 2009, the Company elected to prepay, without penalty, the entire $300 million term loan. The outstanding liability associated with the interest rate swap totaled $3.6 million, and was immediately expensed in earnings upon termination. The Company recognized $5.9 million as increases to interest expense during 2009 related to payments associated with the interest rate swap agreement prior to its termination.

51


At August 28, 2010, the Company had $3.3 million recorded in accumulated other comprehensive loss related to net realized gains associated with terminated interest derivatives, which were designated as hedges. Net gains are amortized into earnings withinover the next 12 months.remaining life of the associated debt. For the fiscal years ended August 28, 2010, and August 29, 2009, the Company reclassified $612 thousand of net gains from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense in each year.
Derivatives not designated as Hedging Instruments
The Company is dependent upon diesel fuel to operate its vehicles used in the Company’s distribution network to deliver parts to its stores and unleaded fuel for delivery of parts from its stores to its commercial customers or other stores. Fuel is not a material component of the Company’s operating costs; however, the Company attempts to secure fuel at the lowest possible cost and to reduce volatility in its operating costs. Because unleaded and diesel fuel include transportation costs and taxes, there are limited opportunities to hedge this exposure directly.
The Company had no fuel hedges during fiscal 2010. During fiscal year 2009, the Company used a derivative financial instrument based on the Reformulated Gasoline Blendstock for Oxygen Blending index to economically hedge the commodity cost associated with its unleaded fuel. The fuel swap did not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and was executed to economically hedge a portion of unleaded fuel purchases. The notional amount of the contract was 2.5 million gallons and terminated August 31, 2009. The loss on the fuel contract for fiscal 2009 was $2.3 million.
Note FI — Financing
The Company’s long-term debt consisted of the following:
                
 August 30, August 25,  August 28, August 29, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007  2010 2009 
Bank Term Loan due December 2009, effective interest rate of 4.40% $300,000 $300,000 
 
4.75% Senior Notes due November 2010, effective interest rate of 4.17% $199,300 $199,300 
5.875% Senior Notes due October 2012, effective interest rate of 6.33% 300,000 300,000  300,000 300,000 
4.375% Senior Notes due June 2013, effective interest rate of 5.65% 200,000 200,000 
6.5% Senior Notes due January 2014, effective interest rate of 6.63% 500,000 500,000 
5.75% Senior Notes due January 2015, effective interest rate of 5.89% 500,000 500,000 
5.5% Senior Notes due November 2015, effective interest rate of 4.86% 300,000 300,000  300,000 300,000 
4.75% Senior Notes due November 2010, effective interest rate of 4.17% 200,000 200,000 
4.375% Senior Notes due June 2013, effective interest rate of 5.65% 200,000 200,000 
6.95% Senior Notes due June 2016, effective interest rate of 7.09% 200,000 200,000  200,000 200,000 
6.5% Senior Notes due July 2008  190,000 
6.5% Senior Notes due January 2014, effective interest rate of 6.63% 500,000  
7.125% Senior Notes due August 2018, effective interest rate of 7.28% 250,000   250,000 250,000 
Commercial paper, weighted average interest rate of 6.1% at August 25, 2007  206,700 
Other  38,918 
Commercial paper, weighted average interest rate of 0.4% at August 28, 2010, and 0.5% at August 29, 2009 433,000 277,600 
          
 $2,250,000 $1,935,618  $2,882,300 $2,726,900 
          
As of August 28, 2010, the commercial paper borrowings and the 4.75% Senior Notes due November 2010 mature in the next twelve months but are classified as long-term in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets, as the Company has the ability and intent to refinance them on a long-term basis. Specifically, excluding the effect of commercial paper borrowings, the Company had $792.4 million of availability under its $800 million revolving credit facility, expiring in July 2012 that would allow it to replace these short-term obligations with long-term financing.
In addition to the long-term debt discussed above, the Company had $26.2 million of short-term borrowings that are scheduled to mature in the next twelve months as of August 28, 2010. The short-term borrowings are unsecured, peso denominated borrowings and accrue interest at 5.69% as of August 28, 2010.

52


In July 2009, the Company maintainsterminated its $1.0 billion of revolving credit facilitiesfacility, which was scheduled to expire in fiscal 2010, and replaced it with a group of banksan $800 million revolving credit facility. This credit facility is available to primarily support commercial paper borrowings, letters of credit and other short-term unsecured bank loans. These facilities expireThis facility expires in May 2010,July 2012, may be increased to $1.3$1.0 billion at AutoZone’s election and subject to bank credit capacity and approval, may include up to $200 million in letters of credit, and may include up to $100 million in capital leases. Asleases each fiscal year. After reducing the available balance is reduced by commercial paper borrowings and certain outstanding letters of credit, the Company had $879.7$331.1 million in available capacity under these facilitiesthis facility at August 30, 2008.28, 2010. Under the revolving credit facility, the Company may borrow funds consisting of Eurodollar loans or base rate loans. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate (defined as LIBOR) plus the applicable percentage, which could range from 150 basis points to 450 basis points, depending upon the senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating of the Company. Interest accrues on base rate loans at the prime rate. The rate of interest payableCompany also has the option to borrow funds under the terms of a swingline loan subfacility. The credit facilitiesfacility expires in 2012.
The revolving credit agreement requires that the Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio as of the last day of each quarter shall be no less than 2.50:1. This ratio is defined as the ratio of (i) consolidated earnings before interest, taxes and rents to (ii) consolidated interest expense plus consolidated rents. The Company’s consolidated interest coverage ratio as of August 28, 2010 was 4.27:1.
In June 2010, the Company entered into a functionletter of Bankcredit facility that allows the Company to request the participating bank to issue letters of America’s base rate or a Eurodollar rate (each as definedcredit on the Company’s behalf up to an aggregate amount of $100 million. The letter of credit facility is in addition to the facility agreements), or a combination thereof.

51


During July 2008, our $190.0 million Senior Notes maturing atletters of credit that time were repaid with an increase in commercial paper. Onmay be issued under the revolving credit facility. As of August 4, 2008, we issued $500.028, 2010, the Company has $100.0 million in 6.50% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250.0 millionletters of credit outstanding under the letter of credit facility, which expires in 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018 under our shelf registration statement filed withJune 2013.
During August 2009, the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2008. We usedCompany elected to prepay, without penalty, a portion of the proceeds to pay down our commercial paper and intend to use the remaining for general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new store openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions.
The $300.0$300 million bank term loan entered in December 2004, was amended in April 2006 to have similar terms and conditions as the $1.0 billion credit facilities, but with a December 2009 maturity, and was further amended in August 2007 to reduce the interest rate on Eurodollar loans. That credit agreement with a group of banks providessubsequently amended. The term loan facility provided for a term loan, which consistsconsisted of, at the Company’s election, base rate loans, Eurodollar loans or a combination thereof. The interest accruesentire unpaid principal amount of the term loan would be due and payable in full on December 23, 2009, when the facility was scheduled to terminate. Interest accrued on base rate loans at a base rate per annum equal to the higher of the prime rate or the Federal Funds Rate plus 1/2 of 1%. Interest accrues on Eurodollar loans at a defined Eurodollar rate plus the applicable percentage, which can range from 30 basis points to 90 basis points, depending upon the Company’s senior unsecured (non-credit enhanced) long-term debt rating. Based on AutoZone’s ratings at August 30, 2008, the applicable percentage on Eurodollar loans is 35 basis points. The Company may select interest periods of one, two, three or six months for Eurodollar loans, subject to availability. Interest is payable at the end of the selected interest period, but no less frequently than quarterly. AutoZone entered into an interest rate swap agreement on December 29, 2004, to effectively fix, based on current debt ratings, the interest rate of the term loan at 4.4%. AutoZone hasThe outstanding liability associated with the option to extend loans into subsequent interest period(s) or convert them into loans of another interest rate type. The entire unpaid principal amountswap totaled $3.6 million, and was expensed in operating, selling, general and administrative expenses upon termination of the term loan will be due and payablehedge in full on December 23,fiscal 2009.
On July 2, 2009, when the facility terminates. The Company may prepay the term loan in whole or in part at any time without penalty, subject to reimbursement of the lenders’ breakage and redeployment costs in the case of prepayment of Eurodollar borrowings.
During April 2006, the $150.0 million Senior Notes maturing at that time were repaid with an increase in commercial paper. On June 8, 2006, the Company issued $200.0$500 million in 6.95%5.75% Senior Notes due 20162015 under its existingthe Company’s shelf registration statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 29, 2008 (the “Shelf Registration”). In addition, on August 17, 2004. That shelf registration allowed4, 2008, the Company issued $500 million in 6.50% Senior Notes due 2014 and $250 million in 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018 under the Shelf Registration. The Shelf Registration allows the Company to sell up to $300 millionan indeterminate amount in debt securities to fund general corporate purposes, including repaying, redeeming or repurchasing outstanding debt and for working capital, capital expenditures, new store openings, stock repurchases and acquisitions. The remainderIn fiscal 2009, the Company used the proceeds from the issuance of debt to repay outstanding commercial paper indebtedness, to prepay our $300 million term loan in August 2009 and for general corporate purposes. Proceeds from the shelf registration was cancelleddebt issuance in February, 2007.fiscal 2008 were used to repay outstanding commercial paper indebtedness and for general corporate purposes.
The 5.75% Senior Notes issued in July, 2009, and the 6.50% and 7.125% notesSenior Notes issued during August 2008 (collectively, the “Notes”), are subject to an interest rate adjustment if the debt ratings assigned to the notesNotes are downgraded anddowngraded. They also contain a provision wherethat repayment of the notesNotes may be accelerated if AutoZone experiences a change in control (as defined in the agreements). The Company’s borrowings under itsthe Company’s other Senior Notessenior notes arrangements contain minimal covenants, primarily restrictions on liens. Under its other borrowing arrangements,the Company’s revolving credit facility, covenants include limitations on total indebtedness, restrictions on liens, a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio and a change of control provision that may require acceleration of the repayment obligations under certain circumstances. All of the repayment obligations under the Company’s borrowing arrangements may be accelerated and come due prior to the scheduled payment date if covenants are breached or an event of default occurs.

53


As of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the Company was in compliance with all covenants and expectsrelated to remain in compliance with all covenants.
its borrowing arrangements. All of the Company’s debt is unsecured. Scheduled maturities of long-term debt are as follows:
        
Fiscal Year Amount 
 (in thousands)  Scheduled 
2009 $ 
2010 300,000 
(in thousands) Maturities 
 
2011 200,000  $632,300 
2012    
2013 500,000  500,000 
2014 500,000 
2015 500,000 
Thereafter 1,250,000  750,000 
      
 $2,250,000  $2,882,300 
      
The fair value of the Company’s debt was estimated at $2.235$3.182 billion as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $1.928$2.853 billion as of August 25, 2007,29, 2009, based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues or on the current rates available to the Company for debt of the same remaining maturities. Such fair value is lessgreater than the carrying value of debt by $15.0$273.5 million and $126.5 million at August 30, 2008,28, 2010 and $7.6 million at August 25, 2007.29, 2009, respectively.

52


Note GJ — Interest Expense
Net interest expense consisted of the following:
                        
 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 August 30, August 25, August 26,  August 28, August 29, August 30, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007 2006  2010 2009 2008 
  
Interest expense $121,843 $123,311 $112,127  $162,628 $147,504 $121,843 
Interest income  (3,785)  (2,819)  (2,253)  (2,626)  (3,887)  (3,785)
Capitalized interest  (1,313)  (1,376)  (1,985)  (1,093)  (1,301)  (1,313)
              
 $116,745 $119,116 $107,889  $158,909 $142,316 $116,745 
              
Note HK — Stock Repurchase Program
During 1998, the Company announced a program permitting the Company to repurchase a portion of its outstanding shares not to exceed a dollar maximum established by the Company’s Board of Directors. The program was last amended inon June 200815, 2010 to increase the repurchase authorization to $6.4$8.9 billion from $5.9$8.4 billion. From January 1998 to August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the Company has repurchased a total of 106.1121.7 million shares at an aggregate cost of $6.3$8.7 billion.
The following table summarizes our share repurchase activity for the following fiscal years:
                        
 Year Ended  Year Ended 
 August 30, August 25, August 26,  August 28, August 29, August 30, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007 2006  2010 2009 2008 
  
Amount $849,196 $761,887 $578,066  $1,123,655 $1,300,002 $849,196 
Shares 6,802 6,032 6,187  6,376 9,313 6,802 
On September 23, 2008,28, 2010, the Board of Directors raisedvoted to increase the authorization by $500 million to raise the cumulative share repurchase authorization from $6.4$8.9 billion to $6.9$9.4 billion. From August 31, 200829, 2010 to October 20, 2008,25, 2010, the Company repurchased 1.6 millionapproximately 800 thousand shares for $204.4$185.9 million.

54


Note IL — Pension and Savings Plans
Prior to January 1, 2003, substantially all full-time employees were covered by a defined benefit pension plan. The benefits under the plan were based on years of service and the employee’s highest consecutive five-year average compensation. On January 1, 2003, the plan was frozen. Accordingly, pension plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan.
On January 1, 2003, the Company’s supplemental defined benefit pension plan for certain highly compensated employees was also frozen. Accordingly, plan participants will earn no new benefits under the plan formula and no new participants will join the pension plan.
In September 2006, the FASB issuedASC Topic 715 (formerly SFAS No. 158, “Employers’Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans, an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R)” (“SFAS 158”). SFAS 158 requires plan sponsors of defined benefit pension and other postretirement benefit plans (collectively postretirement benefit plans) to:to recognize the funded status of their postretirement benefit plans in the statement of financial position, measure the fair value of plan assets and benefit obligations as of the date of the fiscal year-end statement of financial position, and provide additional disclosures.
We The Company adopted the recognition and disclosure provisions of SFAS 158ASC Topic 715 on August 25, 2007. The recognition2007 and adopted the measurement provisions of SFAS 158 required us to recognize the fundedstandard on August 31, 2008.
The Company has recognized the unfunded status of the defined pension plans in its Consolidated Balance Sheets, which isrepresents the difference between the fair value of pension plan assets and the projected benefit obligations of ourits defined benefit pension plans in the August 25, 2007 Consolidated Statements of Financial Position, with a corresponding adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax.plans. The adjustment to accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption represents the net unrecognized actuarial losses and unrecognized prior service costs both of which were previously netted against the plans’ funded statusare recorded in our Consolidated Statements of Financial Position pursuant to the provisions of SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions” (“SFAS 87”).accumulated other comprehensive loss. These amounts will be subsequently recognized as net periodic pension expense pursuant to ourthe Company’s historical accounting policy for amortizing such amounts. Further, actuarial gains and losses that arise in subsequent periods and are not recognized as net periodic pension expense in the same periods will be recognized as a component of other comprehensive income. Those amounts will be subsequently recognized as a component of net periodic pension expense on the same basis as the amounts previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income at adoption of SFAS 158. The adoption of the recognition provisions of SFAS 158 had an immaterial impact on our consolidated financial statements at August 25, 2007.

53


SFAS 158’s provisions regarding the change in the measurement date of pension benefit plans will require the Company to change its measurement date, beginning in fiscal year 2009, from May 31 to its fiscal year end date, August 29, 2009.loss.
The Company’s investment strategy for pension plan assets is to utilize a diversified mix of domestic and international equity and fixed income portfolios together with other investments, to earn a long-term investment return that meets the Company’s pension plan obligations. Active management and alternative investment strategies are utilized within the plan in an effort to minimize risk, while realizing investment returns in excess of market indices.
The weighted average asset allocation for our pension plan assets wasare invested primarily in listed securities, and the pension plans hold only a minimal investment in AutoZone common stock that is entirely at the discretion of third-party pension fund investment managers. The Company’s largest holding classes, U.S. equities and fixed income bonds, are each invested with multiple managers, each holding diversified portfolios with complementary styles and holdings. Accordingly, the Company does not have any significant concentrations of risk in particular securities, issuers, sectors, industries or geographic regions. Alternative investment strategies, including private real estate, are in the process of being liquidated and constitute less than 10% of the pension plan assets. The Company’s investment managers are prohibited from using derivatives for speculative purposes and are not permitted to use derivatives to leverage a portfolio.
Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for investments measured at fair value:
U.S., international, emerging, and high yield equities —These investments are commingled funds and are valued using the net asset values, which are determined by valuing investments at the closing price or last trade reported on the major market on which the individual securities are traded. These investments are subject to annual audits.
Alternative investments —This category represents a hedge fund of funds made up of 17 different hedge fund managers diversified over 9 different hedge strategies. The fair value of the hedge fund of funds is determined using valuations provided by the third party administrator for each of the underlying funds.
Real estate —The valuation of these investments requires significant judgment due to the absence of quoted market prices, the inherent lack of liquidity and the long-term nature of such assets. These investments are valued based upon recommendations of our investment manager incorporating factors such as followscontributions and distributions, market transactions, and market comparables.

55


Fixed income securities —The fair values of corporate, U.S. government securities and other fixed income securities are estimated by using bid evaluation pricing models or quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics.
Cash and cash equivalents —These investments include cash equivalents valued using exchange rates provided by an industry pricing vendor and commingled funds valued using the net asset value. These investments also include cash.
The fair values of investments by level and asset category and the weighted-average asset allocations of the Company’s pension plans at May 31:the measurement date are presented in the following table:
                                        
August 28, 2010August 28, 2010 
 2008 2007  Fair Asset Allocation Fair Value Hierarchy 
(in thousands) Value Actual Target Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 
 Current Target Current Target  
Domestic equities  22.7%  27.5%  30.7%  33.5%
U.S. equities $33,445  28.5%  35.0% $33,445 $ $ 
International equities 33.3 29.0 27.8 23.0  24,049 20.5 25.0 24,049   
Emerging equities 10,431 8.9 10.0 10,431   
High yield equities 10,604 9.0 10.0 10,604   
Alternative investments 31.4 30.5 27.7 30.5  4,348 3.7    4,348 
Real estate 11.8 11.0 11.2 11.0  7,348 6.3    7,348 
Fixed income securities 22,131 18.9 20.0 22,131   
Cash and cash equivalents 0.8 2.0 2.6 2.0  4,887 4.2  4,887   
                      
  100.0%  100.0%  100.0%  100.0% $117,243  100.0%  100.0% $105,547 $ $11,696 
                      
                         
August 29, 2009 
  Fair  Asset Allocation  Fair Value Hierarchy 
(in thousands) Value  Actual  Target  Level 1  Level 2  Level 3 
                         
U.S. equities $20,321   17.6%  22.5% $20,321  $  $ 
International equities  41,959   36.4   28.0   28,678   13,281    
Emerging equities  6,765   5.9   6.0   6,765       
High yield equities                  
Alternative investments  27,314   23.7   30.5         27,314 
Real estate  9,457   8.2   11.0         9,457 
Fixed income securities                  
Cash and cash equivalents  9,497   8.2   2.0   9,497       
                   
  $115,313   100.0%  100.0% $65,261  $13,281  $36,771 
                   
The change in fair value of Level 3 assets that use significant unobservable inputs is presented in the following table:
     
  Level 3 
(in thousands) Assets 
     
Beginning balance — August 29, 2009 $36,771 
Actual return on plan assets:    
Assets held at August 28, 2010  367 
Assets sold during the year  1,446 
Sales and settlements  (26,888)
    
Ending balance — August 28, 2010 $11,696 
    

56


The following table sets forth the plans’ funded status and amounts recognized in the Company’s financial statements:Consolidated Balance Sheets:
                
 August 30, August 25,  August 28, August 29, 
(in thousands) 2008 2007  2010 2009 
  
Change in Projected Benefit Obligation:
  
Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year $161,064 $154,942  $185,590 $156,674 
Interest cost 9,962 9,593  11,315 10,647 
Actuarial gains  (10,818)  (550)
Actuarial losses 18,986 23,637 
Benefits paid  (3,534)  (2,921)  (4,355)  (5,368)
          
Benefit obligations at end of year $156,674 $161,064  $211,536 $185,590 
          
  
Change in plan assets:
 
Change in Plan Assets:
 
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year $161,221 $126,892  $115,313 $160,898 
Actual return on plan assets  (940) 26,677  6,273  (40,235)
Employer contributions 4,151 10,573  12 18 
Benefits paid  (3,534)  (2,921)  (4,355)  (5,368)
          
Fair value of plan assets at end of year $160,898 $161,221  $117,243 $115,313 
          
  
Reconciliation of funded status:
 
Funded status of the plans $4,224 $157 
Contributions from measurement date to fiscal year-end  2,836 
     
Net amount recognized $4,224 $2,993 
     
 
Amount Recognized in the Statement of Financial Position:
  
Noncurrent other assets $7,264 $5,984 
Current liabilities  (17)  (2,991) $(12) $(17)
Long-term liabilities  (3,023)    (94,281)  (70,260)
          
Net amount recognized $4,224 $2,993  $(94,293) $(70,277)
          
  
Amount Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income and not yet reflected in Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
Amount Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and not yet reflected in Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
Net actuarial loss $(6,891) $(3,830) $(94,293) $(70,277)
Prior service cost  (60)  (159)
          
AOCI $(6,951) $(3,989)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss $(94,293) $(70,277)
          
 
Amount Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss and not yet reflected in Net Periodic Benefit Cost and expected to be amortized in next year’s Net Periodic Benefit Cost:
 
Net actuarial loss $(10,252) $(8,354)
     
Amount recognized $(10,252) $(8,354)
     
Net periodic benefit expense (income) consisted of the following:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 28,  August 29,  August 30, 
(in thousands) 2010  2009  2008 
             
Interest cost $11,315  $10,647  $9,962 
Expected return on plan assets  (9,045)  (12,683)  (13,036)
Amortization of prior service cost     60   99 
Recognized net actuarial losses  8,135   73   97 
          
Net periodic benefit expense (income) $10,405  $(1,903) $(2,878)
          
The actuarial assumptions used in determining the projected benefit obligation include the following:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 28,  August 29,  August 30, 
  2010  2009  2008 
             
Weighted average discount rate  5.25%  6.24%  6.90%
          
Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets  8.00%  8.00%  8.00%
          

 

5457


Net Pension Benefits (Income) Expense:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 30,  August 25,  August 26, 
(in thousands) 2008  2007  2006 
             
Components of net periodic benefit cost:            
Interest cost $9,962  $9,593  $9,190 
Expected return on plan assets  (13,036)  (10,343)  (8,573)
Amortization of prior service cost  99   (54)  (627)
Recognized net actuarial losses  97   751   5,645 
          
Net periodic benefit (income) expense $(2,878) $(53) $5,635 
          
The actuarial assumptions were as follows:
             
  2008  2007  2006 
Weighted average discount rate  6.90%  6.25%  6.25%
          
Expected long-term rate of return on assets  8.00%  8.00%  8.00%
          
As the plan benefits are frozen, increases in future compensation levels no longer impact the calculation and there is no service cost. The discount rate is determined as of the measurement date and is based on the calculated yield of a portfolio of high-grade corporate bonds with cash flows that generally match ourthe Company’s expected benefit payments in future years. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on the historical relationships between the investment classes and the capital markets, updated for current conditions.
The Company makes annual contributions in amounts at least equal to the minimum funding requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974. The Company contributed approximately $12 thousand to the plans in fiscal 2010, $18 thousand to the plans in fiscal 2009 and $1.3 million to the plans in fiscal 2008, $13.4 million to the plans in fiscal 2007, and $9.2 million to the plans in fiscal 2006. We do not expect2008. The Company expects to contribute approximately $3 million to the plan in fiscal 2009;2011; however, a change to the expected cash funding may be impacted by a change in interest rates or a change in the actual or expected return on plan assets.
Based on current assumptions about future events, benefit payments are expected to be paid as follows for each of the following fiscal years. Actual benefit payments may vary significantly from the following estimates:
        
 Amount  Benefit 
(in thousands) Payments 
 (in thousands)    
2009 $4,159 
2010 4,778 
2011 5,353  $5,907 
2012 5,924  6,581 
2013 6,631  7,281 
2014 — 2018 43,085 
2014 7,910 
2015 8,544 
2016 – 2020 52,047 
The Company has a 401(k) plan that covers all domestic employees who meet the plan’s participation requirements. The plan features include Company matching contributions, immediate 100% vesting of Company contributions and a savings option up to 25% of qualified earnings. The Company makes matching contributions, per pay period, up to a specified percentage of employees’ contributions as approved by the Board of Directors. The Company made matching contributions to employee accounts in connection with the 401(k) plan of $11.7 million in fiscal 2010, $11.0 million in fiscal 2009 and $10.8 million in fiscal 2008, $9.5 million in fiscal 2007, and $8.6 million in fiscal 2006.2008.

55


Note JM — Leases
The Company leases some of its retail stores, distribution centers, facilities, land and equipment, including vehicles. Most of these leases are operating leases and include renewal options, at the Company’s election, and some include options to purchase and provisions for percentage rent based on sales. Rental expense was $195.6 million in fiscal 2010, $181.3 million in fiscal 2009, and $165.1 million in fiscal 2008, $152.5 million in fiscal 2007, and $143.9 million in fiscal 2006.2008. Percentage rentals were insignificant.
The Company has a fleet of vehicles used for delivery to ourits commercial customers and travel for members of field management. The majority of these vehicles are held under capital lease. At August 30, 2008,28, 2010, the Company had capital lease assets of $62.4$85.8 million, net of accumulated amortization of $14.4$20.4 million, and capital lease obligations of $64.1 million. The $15.9$88.3 million, of which $21.9 million is classified as accrued expenses and other as it represents the current portion of these obligations was recorded as a component of other current liabilities and the $48.2 million long-term portion was recorded as a component of other long-term liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.obligations. At August 25, 2007,29, 2009, the Company had capital lease assets of $54.4$53.9 million, net of accumulated amortization of $11.2$25.4 million, and capital lease obligations of $55.1$54.8 million, of which $16.0$16.7 million was recordedclassified as current liabilitiesaccrued expenses and $39.1 million was recorded as long term liabilities.other.
The Company records rent for all operating leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term, including any reasonably assured renewal periods and the period of time prior to the lease term that the Company is in possession of the leased space for the purpose of installing leasehold improvements. Differences between recorded rent expense and cash payments are recorded as a liability in accrued expenses and other and other long-term liabilities onin the balance sheet. Thisaccompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The deferred rent approximated $51.0$67.6 million on August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and $42.6$59.5 million on August 25, 2007. Additionally, all leasehold improvements are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the remainder of the lease term, including any reasonably assured renewal periods, in effect when the leasehold improvements are placed in service.29, 2009.

58


Minimum
Future minimum annual rental commitments under non-cancelable operating leases and capital leases were as follows at the end of fiscal 2008:2010:
                
 (amounts in thousands)  Operating Capital 
(in thousands) Leases Leases 
 Operating Capital  
Fiscal Year Leases Leases 
2009 $161,435 $16,341 
2010 149,999 17,161 
2011 133,837 14,407  $196,291 $21,947 
2012 117,610 12,968  187,085 24,013 
2013 102,035 7,833  170,858 20,819 
2014 151,287 16,971 
2015 133,549 8,995 
Thereafter 707,535   900,977  
          
Total minimum payments required $1,372,451 68,710  $1,740,047 92,745 
        
Less: interest  (4,649)
Less: Interest  (4,465)
      
Present value of minimum capital lease payments $64,061  $88,280 
      
In connection with the Company’s December 2001 sale of the TruckPro business, the Company subleased some properties to the purchaser for an initial term of not less than 20 years. The Company’s remaining aggregate rental obligation at August 30, 200828, 2010 of $23.7$20.5 million is included in the above table, but the obligation is entirely offset by the sublease rental agreement.
Note KN — Commitments and Contingencies
Construction commitments, primarily for new stores, totaled approximately $20.0$15.8 million at August 30, 2008.28, 2010.
The Company had $94.0$107.6 million in outstanding standby letters of credit and $13.8$23.7 million in surety bonds as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, which all have expiration periods of less than one year. A substantial portion of the outstanding standby letters of credit (which are primarily renewed on an annual basis) and surety bonds are used to cover reimbursement obligations to our workers’ compensation carriers. There are no additional contingent liabilities associated with these instruments as the underlying liabilities are already reflected in the consolidated balance sheet. The standby letters of credit and surety bonds arrangements have automatic renewal clauses.

56


Note LO — Litigation
AutoZone, Inc. is a defendant in a lawsuit entitled “Coalition for a Level Playing Field, L.L.C., et al., v. AutoZone, Inc. et al.,” filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York in October 2004. The case was filed by more than 200 plaintiffs, which are principally automotive aftermarket warehouse distributors and jobbers, (collectively “Plaintiffs”), against a number of defendants, including automotive aftermarket retailers and aftermarket automotive parts manufacturers. In the amended complaint, the plaintiffs allege,inter alia, that some or all of the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants have knowingly received, in violation of the Robinson-Patman Act (the “Act”), from various of the manufacturer defendants benefits such as volume discounts, rebates, early buy allowances and other allowances, fees, inventory without payment, sham advertising and promotional payments, a share in the manufacturers’ profits, benefits of pay on scan purchases, implementation of radio frequency identification technology, and excessive payments for services purportedly performed for the manufacturers. Additionally, a subset of plaintiffs alleges a claim of fraud against the automotive aftermarket retailer defendants based on discovery issues in a prior litigation involving similar Robinson-Patman Act claims.claims under the Act. In the prior litigation, the discovery dispute, as well as the underlying claims, werewas decided in favor of AutoZone and the other automotive aftermarket retailer defendants who proceeded to trial, pursuant to a unanimous jury verdict which was affirmed by the Second Circuit Court of Appeals. In the current litigation, plaintiffs seek an unspecified amount of damages (including statutory trebling), attorneys’ fees, and a permanent injunction prohibiting the aftermarket retailer defendants from inducing and/or knowingly receiving discriminatory prices from any of the aftermarket manufacturer defendants and from opening up any further stores to compete with plaintiffs as long as defendants allegedly continue to violate the Act.

59


In an order dated September 7, 2010 and issued on September 16, 2010, the court granted motions to dismiss all claims against AutoZone and its co-defendant competitors and suppliers.  Based on the record in the prior litigation, the court dismissed with prejudice all overlapping claims – that is, those covering the same time periods covered by the prior litigation and brought by the judgment plaintiffs in the prior litigation. The court also dismissed with prejudice the plaintiffs’ attempt to revisit discovery disputes from the prior litigation.  Further, with respect to the other claims under the Act, the Court found that the factual statements contained in the complaint fall short of what would be necessary to support a plausible inference of unlawful price discrimination.  Finally, the court held that the AutoZone pay-on-scan program is a difference in non-price terms that are not governed by the Act.  The court ordered the case closed, but also stated that “in an abundance of caution the Court [was] defer[ring] decision on whether to grant leave to amend to allow plaintiff an opportunity to propose curative amendments.” Without moving for leave to amend their complaint for a third time, four plaintiffs filed a Third Amended and Supplemental Complaint (the “Third Amended Complaint”) on October 18, 2010. The Third Amended Complaint repeats and expands certain allegations from previous complaints, asserting two claims under the Act, but states that all other plaintiffs have withdrawn their claims, and that,inter alia, Chief Auto Parts, Inc. has been dismissed as a defendant.  The court set no specific procedure for further response or motion by the defendants.  The Company anticipates that the defendants, including AutoZone, will request that the court reject the Third Amended Complaint and/or will seek to have it dismissed.
The Company believes this suit to be without merit and is vigorously defending against it. Defendants have filed motionsThe Company is unable to dismiss all claims with prejudice on substantive and procedural grounds. Additionally, the Defendants have sought to enjoin plaintiffs from filing similar lawsuits in the future. If granted in their entirety, these dispositive motions would resolve the litigation in Defendants’ favor.estimate a loss or possible range of loss.
The Company currently, and from time to time, is involved in various other legal proceedings incidental to the conduct of its business. Although the amount of liability that may result from these other proceedings cannot be ascertained, the Company does not currently believe that, in the aggregate, these matters will result in liabilities material to the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Note MP — Segment Reporting
The Company’s two operating segments (Domestic Auto Parts and Mexico) have been aggregated as one reportable segment: Auto Parts Stores. The criteria the Company managesused to identify the reportable segment are primarily the nature of the products the Company sells and the operating results that are regularly reviewed by the Company’s chief operating decision maker to make decisions about the resources to be allocated to the business units and to assess performance. The accounting policies of the Company’s reportable segment are the same as those described in Note A.
The Auto Parts Stores segment is a retailer and distributor of automotive parts and accessories through the Company’s 4,627 stores in the United States, including Puerto Rico, and Mexico. Each store carries an extensive product line for cars, sport utility vehicles, vans and light trucks, including new and remanufactured automotive hard parts, maintenance items, accessories and non-automotive products.
The “Other” category reflects business activities that are not separately reportable, including ALLDATA which produces, sells and maintains diagnostic and repair information software used in the automotive repair industry, and e-Commerce, which includes direct sales to customers through www.autozone.com.
The Company evaluates its businessreportable segment primarily on the basis of onenet sales and segment profit, which is defined as gross profit. During fiscal 2009, the Company reassessed and revised its reportable segment. See “Note A — Significant Accounting Policies” for a brief description of the Company’s business. As of August 30, 2008, the majority of the Company’s operations were located within the United States. Other operations includesegment to exclude ALLDATA and e-Commerce from the Mexico locations, each of which comprises less than 4% of consolidated net sales. The following data presents sales by primarynewly designated Auto Parts Stores reporting segment. Previously, these immaterial business focus:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 30,  August 25,  August 26, 
(in thousands) 2008  2007  2006 
             
Primary business focus:            
Domestic Retail $5,393,498  $5,160,511  $4,989,266 
Domestic Commercial  753,731   705,567   708,715 
Other  375,477   303,726   250,374 
          
Net sales $6,522,706  $6,169,804  $5,948,355 
          
activities had been combined with Auto Parts Stores.

 

5760


The following table shows segment results for the following fiscal years:
             
  Year Ended 
  August 28,  August 29,  August 30, 
(in thousands) 2010  2009  2008 
             
Net Sales:
            
Auto Parts Stores $7,213,753  $6,671,939  $6,383,697 
Other  148,865   144,885   139,009 
          
Total $7,362,618  $6,816,824  $6,522,706 
          
             
Segment Profit:
            
Auto Parts Stores $3,591,464  $3,296,777  $3,153,703 
Other  120,280   119,672   114,358 
          
Gross profit  3,711,744   3,416,449   3,268,061 
Operating, selling, general and administrative expenses  (2,392,330)  (2,240,387)  (2,143,927)
Interest expense, net  (158,909)  (142,316)  (116,745)
          
Income before income taxes $1,160,505  $1,033,746  $1,007,389 
          
             
Segment Assets:
            
Auto Parts Stores $5,531,955  $5,279,454  $5,239,782 
Other  39,639   38,951   17,330 
          
Total $5,571,594  $5,318,405  $5,257,112 
          
             
Capital Expenditures:
            
Auto Parts Stores $307,725  $260,448  $238,631 
Other  7,675   11,799   4,963 
          
Total $315,400  $272,247  $243,594 
          
             
Sales by Product Grouping:
            
Failure $3,145,528  $2,816,126  $2,707,296 
Maintenance items  2,792,610   2,655,113   2,462,923 
Discretionary  1,275,615   1,200,700   1,213,478 
          
Auto Parts Stores net sales $7,213,753  $6,671,939  $6,383,697 
          

61


Quarterly Summary(1)
(unaudited)(Unaudited)
                                
 Seventeen  Sixteen 
 Twelve Weeks Ended Weeks Ended  Twelve Weeks Ended Weeks Ended 
 November 17, February 9, May 3, August 30,  November 21, February 13, May 8, August 28, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2007 2008 2008 2008 (2)  2009 2010 2010 2010(2) 
  
Net sales $1,455,655 $1,339,244 $1,517,293 $2,210,514  $1,589,244 $1,506,225 $1,821,990 $2,445,159 
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store sales  1.3%  (0.3)%  (0.3)%  0.6%
Gross profit 726,448 667,795 762,006 1,111,812  799,924 753,736 923,121 1,234,963 
Operating profit 237,375 196,885 273,034 416,839  260,428 230,381 355,865 472,740 
Income before income taxes 209,313 168,297 247,703 382,075  224,088 194,072 319,032 423,313 
Net income 132,516 106,704 158,638 243,747  143,300 123,333 202,745 268,933 
Basic earnings per share 2.04 1.69 2.51 3.92  2.86 2.49 4.19 5.77 
Diluted earnings per share 2.02 1.67 2.49 3.88  2.82 2.46 4.12 5.66 
                
 Sixteen 
                 Twelve Weeks Ended Weeks Ended 
 November 18, February 10, May 5, August 25,  November 22, February 14, May 9, August 29, 
(in thousands, except per share data) 2006 2007 2007 2007 (2)  2008 2009 2009 2009(2) 
  
Net sales $1,393,069 $1,300,357 $1,473,671 $2,002,707  $1,478,292 $1,447,877 $1,658,160 $2,232,494 
Increase (decrease) in domestic comparable store sales  0.3%  (0.3)%  0.4%  (0.2)%
Gross profit 685,295 639,212 735,399 1,004,344  741,191 719,298 832,907 1,123,053 
Operating profit 222,996 188,923 264,977 378,369  238,539 214,696 305,232 417,596 
Income before income taxes 195,903 162,105 237,862 340,279  207,373 182,789 273,750 369,834 
Net income 123,889 103,016 151,591 217,175  131,371 115,864 173,689 236,126 
Basic earnings per share 1.74 1.46 2.19 3.26  2.25 2.05 3.18 4.49 
Diluted earnings per share 1.73 1.45 2.17 3.23  2.23 2.03 3.13 4.43 
   
(1) The sum of quarterly amounts may not equal the annual amounts reported due to rounding and due to per share amounts being computed independently for each quarter while the full year is based on the annual weighted average shares outstanding.
 
(2) The fiscal 2008 fourth quarter was based on a 17-week periodfor fiscal 2010 and the fiscal 2007 fourth quarter was2009 are based on a 16-week period. All other quarters presented are based on a 12-week period.

58


Item 9. Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
Not applicable.
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
As of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of AutoZone’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as of August 30, 2008.defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended. Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. During or subsequent to theour fiscal yearfourth quarter ended August 30, 2008,28, 2010, there were no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect internal controls over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
Not applicable.

 

5962


PART III
Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance
The information set forth in Part I of this document in the section entitled “Executive Officers of the Registrant,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item. Additionally, the information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 27, 2008,25, 2010, in the sections entitled “Proposal 1 — Election of Directors” and “Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
The Company has adopted a Code of Ethical Conduct for Financial Executives that applies to its chief executive officer, chief financial officer, chief accounting officer and persons performing similar functions. The Company has filed a copy of this Code of Ethical Conduct as Exhibit 14.1 to this Form 10-K. The Company has also made the Code of Ethical Conduct available on its investor relations website at http://www.autozoneinc.com.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 27, 2008,25, 2010, in the section entitled “Executive Compensation,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 27, 2008,25, 2010, in the sections entitled “Security Ownership of Management” and “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
Not applicable.
Item 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
The information contained in AutoZone, Inc.’s Proxy Statement dated October 27, 2008,25, 2010, in the section entitled “Proposal 23 — Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm,” is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.

 

6063


PART IV
Item 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
The following information required under this item is filed as part of this report
(a) Financial Statements
The following financial statements, related notes and reports of independent registered public accounting firm are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K in Part II, Item 8:
     
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
ReportReports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm    
Consolidated Statements of Income for the fiscal years ended August 30, 2008, 28, 2010,
August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and August 26, 200630, 2008
    
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of August 30, 2008,28, 2010, and August 25, 200729, 2009    
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the fiscal years ended August 30, 2008,28,
2010, August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and August 26, 200630, 2008
    
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ (Deficit) Equity for the fiscal years ended August 30, 2008,28, 2010, August 25, 2007,29, 2009, and August 26, 200630, 2008    
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements    
(b) Exhibits
The Exhibit Index following this document’s signature pages is incorporated herein by reference in response to this item.
(c) Financial Statement Schedules
Schedules are omitted because the information is not required or because the information required is included in the financial statements or notes thereto.

 

6164


SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
     
 AUTOZONE, INC.
 
AUTOZONE, INC.
By:  /s/ William C. Rhodes, III   
  William C. Rhodes, III  
  By:/s/ William C. Rhodes, III
William C. Rhodes, III
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer) 
 
Chairman, President and
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Dated: October 27, 200825, 2010
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated:
     
SIGNATURE TITLE DATE
     
/s/ William C. Rhodes, III
 
William C. Rhodes, III
 Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
 October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ William T. Giles
 
William T. Giles
 Chief Financial Officer and Executive Vice 
President Finance, Information Technology and
Store Development
(Principal Financial Officer)
 October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ Charlie Pleas, III
 
Charlie Pleas, III
 Senior Vice President and Controller 
(Principal Accounting Officer)
 October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ William C. Crowley
 
William C. Crowley
 Director  October 27, 2008
/s/ Charles M. Elson
Charles M. Elson
Director October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ Sue E. Gove
 
Sue E. Gove
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ Earl G. Graves, Jr.
 
Earl G. Graves, Jr.
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ Robert R. Grusky
 
Robert R. Grusky
 Director  October 27, 2008
/s/ N. Gerry House
N. Gerry House
Director October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ J.R. Hyde, III
 
J.R. Hyde, III
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ W. Andrew McKenna
 
W. Andrew McKenna
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
 
George R. Mrkonic, Jr.
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ Luis P. Nieto
 
Luis P. Nieto
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010
     
/s/ Theodore W. Ullyot
 
Theodore W. Ullyot
 Director  October 27, 200825, 2010

 

6265


EXHIBIT INDEX
The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
     
 3.1  Restated Articles of Incorporation of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 13, 1999.
     
 3.2  
Fourth Amended and Restated By-laws of AutoZone, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to theForm 8-K dated September 28, 2007.
     
 4.1  Senior Indenture, dated as of July 22, 1998, between AutoZone, Inc. and the First National Bank of Chicago. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated July 17, 1998.
     
 4.2  Fourth Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Employee Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated September 28, 2007.
     
 4.3  Indenture dated as of August 8, 2003, between AutoZone, Inc. and Bank One Trust Company, N.A. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form S-3 (No. 333-107828) filed August 11, 2003.
     
 4.4  Terms Agreement dated October 16, 2002, by and among AutoZone, Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities Inc. and Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated October 18, 2002.
4.5Form of 6.500%5.875% Note due 2012. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated October 18, 2002.
4.6Terms Agreement dated May 29, 2003, by and among AutoZone, Inc., Citigroup Global Markets Inc. and SunTrust Capital Markets, Inc., as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated May 29, 2003.
4.7Form of 4.375% Note due 2013. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated May 29, 2003.
4.8Terms Agreement dated November 3, 2003, by and among AutoZone, Inc., Banc of America Securities LLC and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated November 3, 2003.
4.9Form of 4.75% Note due 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated November 3, 2003.
4.10Form of 5.5% Note due 2015. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K dated November 3, 2003.
4.11Terms Agreement dated June 8, 2006, by and among AutoZone, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and J.P. Morgan Securities Inc., as representatives of the several underwriters named therein. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1.2 to the Form 8-K dated June 13, 2006.
4.12Form of 6.95% Senior Note due 2016. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated June 13, 2006.
4.13Officers’ Certificate dated August 4, 2008, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 6.5% Senior Notes due 2014. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008.
4.14Form of 6.5% Senior Note due 2014. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008
     
 4.54.15Officers’ Certificate dated August 4, 2008, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 7.125% Senior Notes due 2018. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008.

66


4.16  Form of 7.125% Senior Note due 2018. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated August 4, 2008
4.17Officers’ Certificate dated July 2, 2009, pursuant to Section 3.2 of the Indenture dated August 11, 2003, setting forth the terms of the 5.75% Notes due 2015. Incorporated by reference to 4.1 to the Form 8-K dated July 2, 2009.
4.18Form of 5.75% Senior Note due 2015. Incorporated by reference from the Form 8-K dated July 2, 2009
     
 *10.1  Fourth Amended and Restated Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 4, 2002.
     
 *10.2  Second Amended and Restated 1998 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 26, 2000.
     
 *10.3  Third Amended and Restated 1996 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
     
 *10.4  Form of Incentive Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2002.
     
 *10.5  Form of Non-Qualified Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 23, 2002.
     
 *10.6  AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 12, 2000.
*10.7Form of Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and various executive officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 22, 1999.
*10.8Form of Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc., and various officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended November 18, 2000.
*10.9AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix C to the definitive proxy statement dated November 1, 2002, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 12, 2002.
     
 *10.1010.7  AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix D to the definitive proxy statement dated November 1, 2002, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 12, 2002.
     
 *10.1110.8  Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. Executive Deferred Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended February 15, 2003.

63


10.12Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 17, 2004, among AutoZone, Inc., as borrower, the several lenders from time to time party thereto, and Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent and Citicorp USA, Inc., as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 8, 2004.
     
 *10.1310.9  AutoZone, Inc. 2005 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company’s Proxy Statement dated October 27, 2004, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held December 16, 2004.
     
 10.1410.10  Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004,July 9, 2009, among AutoZone, Inc., as Borrower, theThe Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Fleet National Bank, as Administrative Agent, Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent, Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Joint Lead ArrangerFrom Time To Time Party Hereto, and Sole Book Manager, Banc of America Securities LLC as Joint Lead Arranger, and Calyon New York Branch, BNP Paribas and Regions Bank as Co-Documentation Agents. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Form 8-K dated December 23, 2004 (filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29, 2004).
10.15Lenders’ consent to extend the termination date of the Company’s Amended and Restated 5-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 17, 2004 for an additional period of one year, to May 17, 2010. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 7, 2005.
10.16First Amendment dated as of May 5, 2006, to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004, among AutoZone, Inc., as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A, as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.
10.17Second Amendment dated as of August 3, 2007, to the Credit Agreement dated as of December 23, 2004, (as amended by the First Amendment to Credit Agreement dated as of May 5, 2006) among AutoZone, Inc., as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A, as Administrative Agent, and Wachovia Bank, National Association, as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the From 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007.
10.18Four-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 5, 2006, among AutoZone, Inc. as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A., as Administrative Agent and Citicorp USA, Inc.Swingline Lender, and JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., as Syndication Agent.Agent, and Banc of America Securities, LLC and J.P. Morgan Securities, as Joint Lead Arrangers, and Banc of America Securities, LLC, J.P. Morgan Securities, Inc., Suntrust Robinson Humphrey, Inc., and Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC, as Joint Book Runners, and Suntrust Bank, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Regions Bank, and US Bank National Association, as Documentation Agents. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.410.10 to the Form 10-Q10-K/A for the quarterfiscal year ended May 6, 2006.
10.19Second Amended and Restated Five-Year Credit Agreement dated as of May 5, 2006, among AutoZone, Inc. as Borrower, the Several Lenders from time to time party thereto, Bank of America, N.A. as Administrative Agent and Swingline Lender, and Citicorp USA, Inc. as Syndication Agent. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 6, 2006.August 29, 2009.
     
 *10.2010.11  AutoZone, Inc. 2006 Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix A to the definitive proxy statement dated October 25, 2006, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 13, 2006.
     
 *10.2110.12  Form of Stock Option Agreement. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.26 to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 25, 2007.
     
 *10.2210.13  AutoZone, Inc. Fourth Amended and Restated Executive Stock Purchase Plan. Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the definitive proxy statement dated October 25, 2006, for the annual meeting of stockholders held December 13, 2006.
     
 *10.23Offer letter dated March 19, 2007, to Larry Roesel. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 5, 2007.
*10.2410.14  AutoZone, Inc. Director Compensation Program. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.

 

6467


     
 *10.2510.15  Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Compensation Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to Form 8-K dated January 4, 2008.
     
 *10.2610.16  Amended and Restated AutoZone, Inc. 2003 Director Stock Option Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to Form 8-K dated January 4, 2008.
     
 *10.2710.17  AutoZone, Inc. Enhanced Severance Pay Plan. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
     
 *10.2810.18  Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement signed by each of the following executive officers: Jon A. Bascom, Timothy W. Briggs, Mark A. Finestone, William T. Giles, William W. Graves, Lisa R. Kranc, Thomas B. Newbern, Charlie Pleas III, Larry M. Roesel and James A. Shea; and by AutoZone, Inc., with an effective date of February 14, 2008, for each. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.2 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
     
 *10.2910.19  Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement approved by AutoZone’s Compensation Committee for execution by non-executive officers. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
     
 *10.3010.20  Agreement dated February 14, 2008, between AutoZone, Inc. and William C. Rhodes, III. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.3 to the Form 8-K dated February 15, 2008.
     
 *10.3110.21  Form of non-compete and non-solicitation agreement signed by each of the following officers: Rebecca W. Ballou, Dan Barzel, Craig Blackwell, Brian L. Campbell, Philip B. Daniele, III, Wm. David Gilmore,Robert A. Durkin, Bill Edwards, Joseph Espinosa, Stephany L. Goodnight, David Goudge, James C. Griffith, William R. Hackney, Rodney Halsell, Diana H. Hull, Jeffery Lagges, Grantland E. McGee, Jr., Mitchell Major, Ann A. Morgan, J. Scott Murphy, Jeffrey H. Nix, Raymond A. Pohlman, Elizabeth Rabun, Juan A. Santiago, Joe L. Sellers, Jr., Brett Shanaman and Solomon Woldeslassie. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended May 3, 2008.
     
 10.3210.22  Agreement, dated as of June 25, 2008 between AutoZone, Inc. and ESL Investments, Inc. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated June 26, 2008.
*10.23Second Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and Harry L. Goldsmith dated December 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated December 30, 2008.
*10.24Amended and Restated Employment and Non-Compete Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and Robert D. Olsen dated December 29, 2008. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Form 8-K dated December 30, 2008.
*10.25First Amendment to Amended and Restated Employment Agreement between AutoZone, Inc. and Robert D. Olsen dated September 29, 2009. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Form 8-K dated September 30, 2009.
*10.26AutoZone, Inc. 2010 Executive Incentive Compensation Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the definitive proxy statement dated October 26, 2009, for the Annual Meeting of Stockholders held December 16, 2009.
     
 12.1  Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
     
 14.1  Code of Ethical Conduct. Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14.1 of the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 30, 2003.
     
 21.1  Subsidiaries of the Registrant.

68


     
 23.1  Consent of Ernst & Young LLP.
     
 31.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
 31.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
 32.1  Certification of Principal Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
     
 32.2  Certification of Principal Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 as adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
**101.INSXBRL Instance Document
**101.SCHXBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
**101.CALXBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Document
**101.LABXBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Document
**101.PREXBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Document
**101.DEFXBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Document
   
* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
**In accordance with Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files in Exhibit 101 to the Annual Report on Form 10-K shall be deemed “furnished” and not “filed.”

 

6569