UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________
FORM 10-K
___________________
ýANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20162019
or
¨TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15 (d)15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission file number: 001-33530
Green Brick Partners, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware20-5952523
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation)(IRS Employer Identification Number)
2805 Dallas Pkwy, Ste 400
Plano, Texas 75093
(469) 573-6755
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code)(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Delaware 20-5952523
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation) (IRS Employer Identification Number)
2805 Dallas Pkwy,Ste 400    
Plano,TX75093 (469)573-6755
(Address of principal executive offices, including Zip Code) (Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Classeach classTrading Symbol(s)Name of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per shareThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC
Preferred Stock Purchase RightsGRBKThe Nasdaq Stock Market LLC

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.
Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.
Yes ¨ No ý

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes ý No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes ý.
Yes No ¨
 Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ý
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated filer ý
Non-accelerated filer ¨ Smaller reporting company ¨    Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
Yes ¨ No ý
 
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was $166,424,360$198,930,713 as of June 30, 20162019 (based upon the closing sale price on The Nasdaq Capital Market for such date). For this purpose, all shares held by directors, executive officers and stockholders beneficially owning ten percent or more of the registrant’s common stock have been treated as held by affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

The number of shares of the Registrant'sRegistrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 6, 20172, 2020 was 49,013,662.50,488,010.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The
Portions of the Registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement for its 20172020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders isare incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.









TABLE OF CONTENTS
  
 Item 1.
 Item 1A.
Item 1B.
 Item 1B.2.
Item 2.
 Item 3.
 Item 4.
  
 Item 5.
 Item 6.
 Item 7.
 Item 7A.
 Item 8.
 Item 9.
 Item 9A.
 Item 9B.
  
 Item 10.
 Item 11.
 Item 12.
 Item 13.
 Item 14.
  
 Item 15.
Item 16.
  







FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K includes statements and information that may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, which we refer to as the “Securities Act,” and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, which we refer to as the “Exchange Act.” Statements that are “forward-looking statements,” include any projections of earnings, revenue or other financial items, any statements of the plans, strategies or objectives of management for future operations, any statements concerning proposed new projects or other developments, any statements regarding future economic conditions or performance, any statements of management’s beliefs, goals, strategies, intentions and objectives, any statements concerning potential acquisitions, and any statements of assumptions underlying any of the foregoing. Words such as “may,” “will,” “should,” “could,” “would,” “predicts,” “potential,” “continue,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “future,” “outlook,” “strategy,” “positioned,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “projects,” “estimates” and similar expressions, as well as statements in the future tense, identify forward-looking statements.

These statements are necessarily subjective and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements described in or implied by such statements. Actual results may differ materially from expected results described in our forward-looking statements, including with respect to correct measurement and identification of factors affecting our business or the extent of their likely impact, the accuracy and completeness of the publicly available information with respect to the factors upon which our business strategy is based or the success of our business. In addition, even if results are consistent with the forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, those results may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. Furthermore, industry forecasts are likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time and in industries particularly sensitive to market conditions such as homebuilding and builder finance.

Forward-looking statements should not be read as a guarantee of future performance or results, and will not necessarily be accurate indications of whether, or the times by which, our performance or results may be achieved. Forward-looking statements are based on information available at the time those statements are made and management’s belief as of that time with respect to future events, and are subject to risks and uncertainties that could cause actual performance or results to differ materially from those expressed in or suggested by the forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause such differences include, but are not limited to:

cyclicality in the homebuilding industry and adverse changes in general economic conditions;
fluctuations and cycles in value of, and demand for, real estate investments;
significant inflation or deflation;
the unavailability of subcontractors;
labor and raw material shortages and price fluctuations;
the failure to recruit, retain and develop highly skilled and competent employees;
an inability to acquire undeveloped land, partially-finished developed lots and finished lots suitable for residential homebuilding at reasonable prices;
an inability to develop communities successfully or within expected timeframes;
an inability to sell properties in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions;
risks related to participating in the homebuilding business through controlled homebuilding subsidiaries;
risks relating to buy-sell provisions in the operating agreements governing two builder subsidiaries;
risks related to geographic concentration;
risks related to government regulation;
the interpretation of or changes to tax, labor and environmental laws;
the timing of receipt of regulatory approvals and of the opening of projects;
fluctuations in the market value of land, building lots and housing inventories;
volatility of mortgage interest rates;
the unavailability of mortgage financing;




the number of foreclosures in our markets;
interest rate increases or adverse changes in federal lending programs;
increases in unemployment or underemployment;
any limitation on, or reduction or elimination of, tax benefits associated with owning a home;
the occurrence of severe weather or natural disasters;
high cancellation rates;
competition in the homebuilding, land development and financial services industries;
risks related to future growth through strategic investments, joint ventures, partnerships and/or acquisitions;
the inability to obtain suitable bonding for the development of housing projects;
difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital;
risks related to environmental laws and regulations;
the occurrence of a major health and safety incident;
poor relations with the residents of our communities;
information technology failures and data security breaches;
product liability claims, litigation and warranty claims;
the seasonality of the homebuilding industry;
utility and resource shortages or rate fluctuations;
the failure of employees or other representatives to comply with applicable regulations and guidelines;
future litigation, arbitration or other claims;
uninsured losses or losses in excess of insurance limits;
cost and availability of insurance and surety bonds;
volatility and uncertainty in the credit markets and broader financial markets;
availability, terms and deployment of capital including with respect to the timing and size of share repurchases, acquisitions, joint ventures and other strategic actions;
our debt and related service obligations;
required accounting changes;
an inability to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting; and
other risks and uncertainties inherent in our business, including those described in Item 1A. “Risk Factors.”

Should one or more of the risks or uncertainties described above or elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K occur, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, our actual results and plans could differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date they are made. Except as required by law, we disclaim all responsibility to publicly update any information contained in a forward-looking statement.

All forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on our behalf, including any such forward-looking statements made subsequent to the publication of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, are expressly qualified in their entirety by this cautionary statement.







PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS

References
Unless the context otherwise requires, references to the “Company”, “Green Brick”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer to the consolidated company, which has been renamed Green Brick Partners, Inc. and its subsidiaries, resulting from the acquisition by BioFuel Energy Corp. and its then consolidated subsidiaries (“BioFuel”) of JBGL Builder Finance LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies (collectively “Builder Finance”), and JBGL Capital Companies (“Capital”), a combined group of commonly managed limited liability companies and partnerships (collectively with Builder Finance, “JBGL”) by means of a reverse recapitalization transaction on October 27, 2014.

General
Green Brick Partners, Inc. (formerly named BioFuel Energy Corp.) wasand its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”, “we”, or “Green Brick”) is a diversified homebuilding and land development company incorporated as aunder the laws of the State of Delaware corporation on April 11, 2006, to invest solely in BioFuel Energy, LLC, a limited liability company organized on January 25, 2006, to build and operate ethanol production facilities in the Midwestern United States. On November 22, 2013, the Company disposed of its ethanol plants and all related assets. Following the disposition of these production facilities, we were a public shell company with no substantial operations.2006.


On June 10, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive transaction agreement with the owners of JBGL, which provided that we would acquire JBGL for $275.0 million, payable in cash and shares of our common stock (the “Transaction”). JBGL is a real estate operator involved in the purchase and development of land for residential use, construction lending and home building operations. The Transaction was completed on October 27, 2014 (the “Transaction Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction, we paid the $275.0 million purchase price with approximately $191.8 million in cash and the remainder in 11,108,500 shares of our common stock valued at approximately $7.49 per share.

The cash portion of the purchase price was primarily funded from the proceeds of a $70.0 million rights offering conducted by the Company (the $70.0 million includes proceeds from purchases of shares of common stock by certain funds and accounts managed by Greenlight Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (“Greenlight”) and Third Point LLC and its affiliates (“Third Point”)), and $150.0 million of debt financing provided by Greenlight pursuant to a loan agreement, with the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Loan Agreement”), which provided for a five year term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility").

The $70.0 million rights offering included a registered offering by the Company of transferable rights to the public holders of its common stock, as of September 15, 2014 (the “Rights Offering”) to purchase additional shares of common stock. Each right permitted the holder to purchase, at a rights price ultimately equal to $5.00 per share of common stock, 2.2445 shares of common stock. 4,843,384 shares of common stock were purchased in the public Rights Offering for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $24.2 million.

In addition to the Rights Offering, Greenlight and Third Point participated in a private rights offering to purchase additional shares of common stock pursuant to commitment letters. Pursuant to its commitment letter, Third Point agreed to participate in the private rights offering for its full basic subscription privilege in the Rights Offering and to purchase, simultaneously with the consummation of the Rights Offering to the public, all of the available shares not otherwise sold in the Rights Offering following the exercise of all other public holders’ basic subscription privileges. Pursuant to such commitment letters, Greenlight purchased 4,957,618 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $24.8 million and Third Point purchased 4,198,998 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $21.0 million.

In connection with the Transaction, we entered into a backstop agreement with Third Point. The backstop agreement set forth, among other things, the terms of Third Point's backstop commitment. Third Point did not receive compensation for its commitment to participate in the private rights offering or its backstop commitment.

At the time the Transaction was completed, BioFuel was a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal operations and assets consisting of cash, deferred tax assets, and nominal other nonoperating assets. As a result of the Transaction the owners and management of JBGL gained effective operating control of the combined company.

Accordingly, for financial reporting purposes, the Transaction was deemed to be a capital transaction in substance and recorded as a reverse recapitalization of JBGL whereby JBGL is deemed to be the continuing, surviving entity for accounting purposes, but through reorganization, has deemed to have adopted the capital structure of BioFuel. Because the acquisition was considered a reverse recapitalization for accounting purposes, the combined historical financial statements of JBGL became our historical financial statements and from the completion of the acquisition on October 27, 2014, the financial statements have


been prepared on a consolidated basis. The assets and liabilities of BioFuel have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized in connection with the Transaction.

As a result of the Transaction, Green Brick changed its business direction and is now in the real estate industry.

On July 1, 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 17 million shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share and granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an aggregate of 841,500 additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments (the “Equity Offering”). On July 23, 2015, the underwriters exercised the option and purchased 444,897 additional shares. All of the shares were sold by us pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement previously filed with the SEC.

The Equity Offering resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $170.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. On July 1, 2015, we used approximately $154.9 million of the net proceeds from the Equity Offering to repay all of the outstanding principal, interest and a prepayment premium under the Term Loan Facility. Upon repayment, the Term Loan Facility was terminated and all security interests in, and all liens held by Greenlight with respect to, the assets of Green Brick securing the amounts owed under the Term Loan Facility were terminated and released. We used the remaining net proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes.

Our Company
We are a uniquely structured company that combines residential land development and homebuilding. We acquire and develop land, provide land and construction financing to our wholly owned and controlled builders (together, “builders”) and participate in the profits of our controlled builders. Our core markets are in the high growth U.S. metropolitan areas of Dallas, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia.Georgia, as well as the Vero Beach, Florida area. We also own a noncontrolling interest in a builder in Colorado Springs, Colorado. We are engaged in all aspects of the homebuilding process, including land acquisition and the development, entitlements, design, construction, title and mortgage services, marketing and sales and the creation of brand images at our residential neighborhoods and master planned communities.

We believe we offer higher quality homes with more distinctive designs and floor plans than those built by our competitors at comparable prices. Our communities are located in premium locations in our core markets and we seek to enhance homebuyer satisfaction by utilizing high-quality materials, offering a broad range of customization options and building well-crafted energy-efficient homes. We seek to maximize value over the long term and operate our business to mitigate risks in the event of a downturn by controlling costs and quickly reacting to regional and local market trends.


We are a leading lot developer in the Dallas and Atlantaour markets and believe that our strict operating discipline provides us with a competitive advantage in seeking to maximize returns while minimizing risk. We currently own or control over 5,200approximately 9,000 home sites in premium locations inhigh-growth submarkets throughout the Dallas and Atlanta markets. We consider premium locations to be lot supply constrained with high housing demandmetropolitan areas and where much of the surrounding land has already been developed.Vero Beach, Florida market. We are strategically positioned to either build new homes on our lots through our controlled builders or to sell finished lots to large unaffiliatedthird-party homebuilders.

We sell finished lots to our builders or option lots from third-party developers tofor our controlled builders for theirbuilders’ homebuilding operations and provide them with construction financing and strategic planning. Our controlled builders provide us with their local knowledge and relationships.

We support some of our controlledDallas and Atlanta builders by financing their purchases of land from us at an unlevered internal rate of return (“IRR”) of at leasttypically 20% or more and by providing construction financing at approximately a 13.8%an interest rate.rate target of at least 13.85%, subject to changes due to market conditions. Our income is further enhanced by our 50% equity interest in the profits of our controlled builders.

In addition,December 2018, EJB River Holdings, LLC joint venture (“EJB River Holdings”) was formed by The Providence Group of Georgia LLC (“TPG”) with the purpose to acquire and develop a tract of land in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In May 2019, East Jones Bridge, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“EJB”) was admitted as a member of EJB River Holdings, which resulted in TPG and EJB each having a 50% ownership interest in EJB River Holdings. EJB River Holdings had no activity in the period from its formation until October 2019. In October 2019, EJB River Holdings received two $5.0 million initial contributions from its two members, TPG and EJB. In December 2019, two additional contributions of $0.3 million were made by TPG and EJB to EJB River Holdings. The Company determined that the investment in EJB River Holdings should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Effective November 30, 2019, we, sellthrough our wholly owned subsidiary, SGHDAL LLC (“Southgate”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Southgate Homes DFW LLC. As a result, Southgate became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company.

Effective December 31, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, CLH20, LLC (“Centre Living”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Centre Living Homes, LLC, and we contributed certain real estate inventory assets to third-party homebuilders also typically generatesCentre Living. Subsequently, the prior owner of a portion of the membership and voting interests in Centre Living Homes, LLC acquired a ten percent membership and voting interest in Centre Living for $3.6 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2019, Centre Living was an unlevered IRR targeted at 20% or greater.

References to our “controlled builders” refer to our homebuilding subsidiariesindirect subsidiary in which we ownthe Company owned a ninety percent membership interest and a ninety percent voting interest.

In December 2019, the Company announced its plans to expand the business of Trophy Signature Homes, LLC, a wholly owned homebuilding company (“Trophy”) into Houston, Texas. Trophy was formed in September 2018 and allowed the Company to expand its business and offer homes at least a 50% controlling interest.new price point within the Dallas-Fort Worth Metroplex market. Trophy began home sales in the first half of 2019 and has generated revenues of $13.9 million during the year ended December 31, 2019.



The following table presents general information about our builders, including the types of homes they build and their price ranges.
Our Controlled BuildersBuilder 
Year
Formed
 Market Products Offered Prices RangesPrice Range
The Providence Group of Georgia L.L.C.LLC (“TPG”) 2011 Atlanta Townhomes $280,000320,000 to $600,000$690,000
Condominiums$380,000 to $580,000
Single family$320,000340,000 to $1.2 million$1,010,000
CB JENI Homes DFW LLC (“CB JENI”) 2012 Dallas Townhomes $230,000 to $400,000$480,000
Single family$340,000330,000 to $700,000$760,000
Centre Living Homes,CLH20 LLC (“Centre Living”) 2012 Dallas Townhomes $350,000340,000 to more than $1.5 million$550,000
Contractor on luxury homesUpSingle family$390,000 to $2.5 million$850,000
Southgate Homes DFWSGHDAL LLC (“Southgate”) 2013 Dallas Luxury homes $560,000500,000 to $1.3 million$1,060,000
GRBK GHO Homes LLC (“GRBK GHO”)2018Vero BeachPatio homes$200,000 to $400,000
Single family$250,000 to $750,000
Trophy Signature Homes LLC (“Trophy”)2018DallasSingle family$240,000 to $560,000




DuringRevenues from homebuilding operations accounted for 96%, 94% and 96% of the first quarter of 2015, we formed Green Brick Title, LLC (“Green Brick Title”), our wholly-owned title company. Green Brick Title's core business includes title insurance, and closing and settlement servicesCompany’s total revenues for our homebuyers. Green Brick Title had minimal operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

The following chart sets forth the number of new homes delivered by our controlled builders, the home sales revenue, the average sales price of homes delivered and the amount of lot sales revenue generated during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018, and 2014.2017, respectively. For more information regarding the Company’s segments, refer to Note 11 to the Consolidated Financial Statements located in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” located in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our backlog reflects the number and value of homes for which we have entered into sales contracts with customers but not yet delivered. With the exception of a normal cancellation rate, we expect all of the backlog as of December 31, 2019 to be filled during 2020. The following table sets forth the information about selling communities and backlog of our builders.
  Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease) Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
  2016 2015 Amount % 2015 2014 Amount %
New homes delivered 844
 655
 189
 28.9 % 655
 587
 68
 11.6 %
Home sales revenue (dollars in thousands) $365,164
 $254,267
 $110,897
 43.6 % $254,267
 $200,650
 $53,617
 26.7 %
Average sales price of home delivered $432,659
 $388,194
 $44,465
 11.5 % $388,194
 $341,823
 $46,371
 13.6 %
Lot sales revenue (dollars in thousands) $15,164
 $36,878
 $(21,714) (58.9)% $36,878
 $45,452
 $(8,574) (18.9)%
  Year Ended December 31, 2019 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Builder Average Selling Communities Selling Communities Backlog, Units Backlog, in thousands Selling Communities Backlog, Units Backlog, in thousands
TPG 23
 19
 104
 $58,905
 27
 146
 $77,563
CB JENI 25
 28
 294
 115,057
 21
 170
 67,988
Centre Living 7
 9
 14
 7,696
 6
 14
 7,493
Southgate 10
 11
 71
 49,280
 8
 55
 37,873
GRBK GHO 16
 18
 147
 56,021
 14
 197
 73,358
Trophy 5
 10
 156
 59,869
 
 
 $
Total 86
 95
 786
 $346,828
 76
 582
 $264,275


Our Competitive StrengthsFor more information on recent business developments and results of operations, refer to “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” located in Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Our business is characterized by
Business Strategy

We believe we are well-positioned for growth through the disciplined execution of the following competitive strengths:

Optionality Provided by Our Combined Land Development and Homebuilding Structure
We are a uniquely structured company that combines residential land development and homebuilding. We are strategically positioned to either build and sell new homes on lots through our controlled builders or develop land and sell finished lots to large unaffiliated homebuilders. While our business plan increasingly has focused on building new homes on our owned and controlled lots, we proactively monitor market conditions to opportunistically sell a minorityelements of our finished lots to large unaffiliated homebuilders if we believe that doing so will maximize our returns or lower our risk.strategy:


Experienced Management Team
Our management team is comprised of homebuilding and finance veterans that collectively have decades of experience and local knowledge of our core markets. Our founder and Chief Executive Officer, James R. Brickman has over 39 years of experience in real estate development and home building. Richard A. Costello, our Chief Financial Officer, joined the Company in 2015 and provides oversight of all financial reporting, lending relationships, audit supervision, cash management, and investor relations. Mr. Costello has over 25 years of financial and operational experience in all aspects of real estate management. Jed Dolson, Head ofCombine Land Acquisition and Development joined JBGL as an employeeExpertise with Homebuilding Operations to Maximize Profitability

Our ability to identify, acquire and develop land in 2013desirable locations and on favorable terms is responsible forcritical to our success. We evaluate land entitlementopportunities based on how we expect such opportunities will contribute to overall profitability and returns, rather than how they might drive volume on a market basis. We identify attractive properties that are typically located in prime neighborhood locations. We consider the existing and future supply of developable land before working to acquire the best-valued properties. Analysis includes consideration of development activities, including overseeing ourcosts in addition to land costs. We have found that the prime


quality infill locations have limited supply competition that may result in smaller value declines in down markets. We manage and oversee all land development operations in Dallas. Our management team has a proven record of running profitable businesses and making prudent investment decisions. with our in-house staff.

We believe our expertise in land development and planning enables us to create desirable communities that meet or exceed our experienced management team is well positionedtarget homebuyer’s expectations, while selling homes at competitive prices. Our strategy of holding land inventory provides us with a multi-year supply of lots for future homebuilding while limiting any excess supply that would otherwise be subject to design and executemarket cycle risk. We focus on the development of complex, master planned residential communities.

Focusentitled parcels in communities where we can generally sell all lots and homes within 24 to 60 months from the start of sales. This focus allows us to limit exposure to land development and market cycle risk while pursuing favorable returns on Operations in Dallas and Atlanta Housing Markets with a Favorable Growth Outlook and Strong Demand Fundamentals
our investments. We currently operate inseek to minimize our exposure to land risk through disciplined management of entitlements, the Dallas and Atlanta markets, which we believe are among the most desirable homebuilding markets in the nation. We believe our core markets exhibit attractive residential real estate investment characteristics, such as growing economies, improving levelsuse of employment and population growth relative to national averages, favorable migration patterns, general housing affordability, and desirable lifestyle and weather characteristics.

Among the 12 largest metropolitan areas in the country, the Dallas metropolitan area ranked first in the rate of job growth and second in the number of jobs from September 2015 to September 2016 (Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2016). The Atlanta metropolitan area has recorded employment gains of more than 50,000 each month, as compared to the same month in the prior year, since July 2013 (Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, November 2016).

We believe that increasing demand and supply constraints in our core markets create favorable conditions for our future growth.



Attractive Land Positions in Our Core Markets
We believe that we have strategically well-located land positions and lot positions within our core markets. We believe we have acquired our land and lot positions at attractive prices, providing us with significant opportunity for a healthy return on our investment. We expect the demand for housing in our core markets to continue to improve, due to rising consumer confidence, high affordability metrics,options and a reduction in home inventory levels.

We seek to acquireother flexible land with convenient access to Dallas and Atlanta metropolitan areas which have diverse economic and employment bases and demographics that we believe will support long-term growth. For example, Capital currently owns, controls or is developing approximately 3,000 home sites under the brand Green Brick Communities in the Dallas market. Builder Finance owns or controls approximately 2,200 home sites in the Dallas and Atlanta markets.

We believe that our attractive inventory of home sites will enable us to capture the benefits of expected increases in home sales volumes and home prices as the U.S. housing market continues to recover and demand for new homes increases.

Land Sourcing and Evaluation Capabilities
We believe that our extensive experience and the strong reputation of our management team combined with our long-standing relationships with other market participants provide us with a competitive advantage in efficiently sourcing, purchasing and entitling land.acquisition arrangements. We are actively involved in every step of the land entitlement, home design and construction processprocesses with our controlled builders.

Maximize Benefits of Diversified Homebuilding and Land Development Structure

Our management team has developed significant collaborative relationships over decades withdiversified homebuilding and land sellers, developers, contractors, lenders, brokersdevelopment structure provides the flexibility to monetize the value of our land assets either by building and investors throughoutselling homes through our builders or developing land and selling finished lots to unaffiliated homebuilders. When evaluating our land assets, we consider the Dallas and Atlanta markets. Our deep and wide-ranging knowledgepotential contribution of the Dallas and Atlanta markets and our ability to quickly and efficiently identify, acquire and develop land in desirable locations and on favorable terms are keyeach asset to our success.overall performance, taking into account the timeframe over which we may monetize the asset. While we currently expect the majority of our land to be utilized by our homebuilders, we believe our land development and homebuilding strategy provides us with increased flexibility to seek to maximize risk-adjusted returns as market conditions warrant.


Increase Long-Term Value by Investing in Infrastructure

In our communities, we typically make enhanced investment in infrastructure, including landscaping and amenity centers, and enforce higher construction standards through our builders. We believe this creates greater long-term value for us and for our builders, homebuyers, shareholders and the communities in which we build.

Disciplined Investment Approach

We seek to maximize value over the long-term and operate our business to mitigate risks in the event of a downturn by controlling costs and focusing on regional and local market trends.

Our management team has gained significant operating expertise through varied economic cycles. The perspective gained from these experiences has helped shape our investment approach. We believe that our management team has learned to effectively evaluate housing trends in our markets, and to react quickly and rationally to market changes. For example, we made significant land investments during the downturn at prices that we view as attractive. Our cycle-tested management approach balances strategic planning with local day-to-day decision-making responsibilities, freeing up our controlled builders to concentrate on growing our homebuilding business rather than focusing on obtaining capital to fund their operations. We believe that our strict operating discipline provides us with a competitive advantage in seeking to maximize returns while minimizing risk.


No Legacy IssuesIncrease Market Positions in Housing Markets with a Favorable Growth Outlook and Strong Demand Fundamentals
We do not have distressed legacy assets or liabilities to manage. All of our owned land and lots, as well as those we have under option contracts, purchase contracts or non-binding letter of intent, are located in markets that we targeted during the downturn or after recovery had commenced. The absence of legacy issues has allowed us to attract and retain experienced and talented land development personnel who became available during the downturn.
We believe that the absence of legacy issues enableswe have strategically well-located land and lot positions within our core markets and that we have acquired our land and lot positions at attractive prices, providing us to achieve superior growth and profitability instead of diverting resources to manage troubled assets and relationships.

Business Strategy
with significant opportunity for a healthy return on our investment. We believe we are well-positioned forour core markets exhibit attractive residential real estate investment characteristics, such as growing economies, improving levels of employment and population growth relative to national averages, favorable migration patterns, general housing affordability, and desirable lifestyle and weather characteristics. We believe that increasing demand and supply constraints in our core Dallas and Atlanta markets through the disciplined execution of the following elements of our strategy:

Combine Land Acquisition and Development Expertise with Homebuilding Operations to Maximize Profitability
Our ability to identify, acquire and develop land in desirable locations and oncreate favorable terms is critical to our success. We evaluate land opportunities based on how we expect such opportunities will contribute to overall corporate profitability and returns, rather than how they might drive volume on a market basis. We believe our expertise in land development and planning enables us to create desirable communities that meet or exceed our target homebuyer’s expectations, while selling homes at competitive prices. Our strategy of holding land inventory provides us with a multi-year supply of lots for future homebuilding. We focus on the development of entitled parcels in communities where we can generally sell all lots and homes within 24 to 60 months from the start of sales. This focus allows us to limit exposure to land development and market cycle risk while pursuing


attractive returns on our investments. We seek to minimize our exposure to land risk through disciplined management of entitlements, the use of land options and other flexible land acquisition arrangements.

Maximize Benefits of Unique Land Development and Homebuilding Structure
Our unique land development and homebuilding structure provides the flexibility to monetize the value of our land assets either by building and selling homes through our controlled builders or developing land and selling finished lots to large unaffiliated homebuilders. When evaluating our land assets, we consider the potential contribution of each asset to our overall performance, taking into account the timeframe over which we may monetize the asset. While we currently expect the majority of our land to be utilized by our controlled homebuilders, we believe our land development and homebuilding strategy provides us with increased flexibility to seek to maximize risk-adjusted returns as market conditions warrant.

Increase Long-Term Value by Investing in Infrastructure
In our communities, we typically make enhanced investment in infrastructure, including landscaping, amenity centers and enforcing higher construction standards on our controlled and unaffiliated builders in our communities. We believe this creates greater long-term value for us and for our controlled and unaffiliated builders, homebuyers, shareholders and the communities in which we build.future growth.

Drive Revenue by Opening New Communities from Existing Land Supplies
We have strategically invested in new land in a number of prime neighborhoods in our core markets. We currently own or control over 5,200 home sites in the Dallas and Atlanta markets. We believe that a majority of our land inventory was purchased or controlled at low price points during the downturn in the housing cycle. We expect these land purchases to provide us with the opportunity for continued revenue growth and strong gross margin performance. We continue to identify development opportunities that should allow us to profit from lot sales, construction interest and our 50% equity interest in the profits of our controlled builders.

Increase Market Position in Dallas and Atlanta
We believe that there are significant opportunities to profitably expand in our core markets. For example, we currently own or control approximately 9,000 home sites in the Dallas, Atlanta and Vero Beach markets. In Dallas and Atlanta, markets.we seek to acquire land with convenient access to metropolitan areas which have diverse economic and employment bases and demographics that we believe will support long-term growth. We continuallycontinuously review the allocation of our investments in these markets taking into account demographic trends and the likely impact on our operating results. We use the results of these reviews to re-allocatereallocate our investments to those areas where we believe we can maximize our profitability and return on capital. We seek to use our local relationships with land sellers, brokers and investors to pursue the purchase of additional land parcels in our core markets. While our primary growth strategy focuses on increasing our market position in our existing markets, we may, on an opportunistic basis, explore expansion into attractive new markets.




Superior Design, Broad Product Range and Enhanced Homebuying Experience

Within each of our core markets, we partner our expertise with that of our controlled builders to design attractive neighborhoods and homes to appeal to a wide variety of potential homebuyers. One of our core operating philosophyphilosophies is to create a culture which provides a positive, memorable experience for our homebuyers through active engagement in the building process. At higher price points, we provide our homebuyers with customization options to suit their specific needs and tastes. We engineer our homes for energy-efficiency to reduce the impact on the environment and lower energy costs for our homebuyers. In consultation with nationally and locally recognized architecture firms, interior and exterior consultants and homeowner focus groups, we research and design a diversified range of products for various levels and price points. Our homebuilding projects include townhomes, patio homes, single family homes and luxury custom homes. We believe we can adapt quickly to changing market conditions and optimize performance and returns while strategically reducing portfolio risk because of our diversified product strategy.


Pursue Further Growth Through the Prudent Use of Leverage

As of December 31, 2016,2019, our debt to total capitalization ratio was 31.3%. The debt to total capitalization ratio is approximately 18%.calculated as the sum of borrowings on lines of credit and the senior unsecured notes, net of debt issuance costs, divided by the total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity. It is our intent to prudently employ leverage to continue to invest in our land acquisition, development and homebuilding businesses. We intend to target a debt to total capitalization ratio of approximately 35%30% to 40%35%, which we expect will continue to provide us with significant additional growth capital.


Pursue Acquisitions of Additional Homebuilders

We intend to pursue the acquisition of additional homebuilders in our core and new markets. Our preference is to continue to acquire controlling interestinterests in homebuilders with existing management continuing to own a significant ownership stake. We will seek to acquire and then retain management teams which have the deepstrong local relationships with land owners and have a


strong positive reputation for building well-crafted homes in their markets. We expect that our ability to provide capital discipline and strategic oversight will complement the local skills, relationships and reputations toof our future homebuilder partners.


Our Homebuilding Projects
Our homebuilding projects usually take approximately 24 to 60 months to complete from the start of sales, although certain projects may take longer to complete. The following table presents project information relating to each of our markets as of December 31, 2016, as well as current projects under development. Our backlog reflects the number and value of homes for which we have entered into non-contingent sales contracts with customers but not yet delivered. (While we may accept sales contracts on a contingent basis in limited circumstances, such contracts are not included in our backlog until the contingency is removed).
Projects 
Year of
First
Delivery(1)
 
Total
Number of
Homes in
Project(2)
 
Cumulative
Units Closed
as of
December 31, 2016
 
Backlog at
December 31, 2016
 Lots as of December 31, 2016 
Sales
Price Range
(in thousands)
 
Home Size
Range
(sq. ft.)
Texas              
CB JENI Frisco Springs 2018 105
 
 
 105
 TBD TBD
CB JENI Grand Canal THs 2015 58
 52
 1
 5
 $310 - $430 1,700 - 2,600
CB JENI Heritage Creekside 2017 105
 
 
 105
 $290 - $340 1,900 - 2,100
CB JENI Hometown 2016 34
 17
 11
 6
 $260 - $370 1,700 - 2,300
CB JENI Los Rios, LLC 2016 98
 23
 15
 60
 $250 - $330 1,400 - 2,100
CB JENI McKinney Ranch, LLC 2016 71
 8
 3
 60
 $230 - $290 1,500 - 2,000
CB JENI Montgomery Ridge 2017 32
 
 
 32
 $270 - $370 1,700 - 2,600
CB JENI Mustang Park LLC TH 2014 177
 113
 6
 58
 $270 - $380 1,500 - 2,300
CB JENI Raiford Road 2015 53
 48
 5
 
 $270 - $370 1,700 - 2,600
CB JENI Ridgeview Townhomes 2018 91
 
 
 91
 TBD TBD
CB JENI Sloan Creek 2017 36
 
 
 36
 $260 - $360 1,400 - 2,100
CB JENI Spicewood 2018 82
 
 
 82
 TBD TBD
CB JENI Stacy Crossing, LLC 2016 145
 22
 9
 114
 $260 - $360 1,500 - 2,300
CB JENI Stonegate, LLC 2016 79
 
 4
 75
 $260 - $320 1,500 - 2,000
CB JENI Sunset Pointe 2018 114
 
 
 114
 TBD TBD
CB JENI Viridian LLC 2013 278
 131
 23
 124
 $230 - $310 1,500 - 2,000
CB JENI/Normandy Southgate 2018 150
 
 
 150
 TBD TBD
Centre Living Homes Caddo Center 2017 10
 
 
 10
 $320 - $350 1,400
Centre Living Homes Fort Worth Avenue 2018 58
 
 
 58
 TBD TBD
Centre Living Homes Live Oak Landings 2017 26
 
 
 26
 $425 - $475 1,450 - 1,850
Centre Living Homes Residences at Cityline 2017 32
 
 
 32
 $525 - $650 2,700 - 3,300
Centre Living Homes Roseland Avenue 2018 13
 
 
 13
 TBD TBD
Centre Living Homes Ross Avenue Heights 2017 20
 
 
 20
 $575 - $600 2,400
Centre Living Homes Scurry Street 2018 10
 
 
 10
 TBD TBD
Centre Living Homes Swiss & Haskell 2018 21
 
 
 21
 TBD TBD
Centre Living Homes Westside Manor 2017 7
 
 
 7
 $1,100 - $1,500 3,000 - 4,000
Normandy Cottonwood Crossing 2015 47
 38
 7
 2
 $300 - $460 1,800 - 3,450
Normandy Cypress Meadows LLC 2014 140
 66
 7
 67
 $470 - $700 2,700 - 4,400
Normandy Edgewood 2018 46
 
 
 46
 TBD TBD
Normandy Homes Viridian LLC 2014 66
 36
 
 30
 $310 - $330 2,100 - 2,400
Normandy Lakeside, LLC 2014 76
 75
 
 1
 $375 - $700 2,200 - 4,400
Normandy Mustang SF 2015 83
 37
 14
 32
 $410 - $700 2,200 - 4,400
Normandy Twin Creeks 2016 72
 23
 10
 39
 $350 - $500 1,800 - 3,450
Normandy Watters Branch 2017 48
 
 
 48
 $400 - $550 2,000 - 3,800
Southgate 2013 54
 50
 4
 
 $640 - $870 3,300 - 4,660
Southgate - Parker/Southgate Ranch 2018 32
 
 
 32
 TBD TBD
Southgate Angel Field West 2016 62
 16
 10
 36
 $560 - $760 3,400 - 4,500
Southgate Bethany Mews 2016 4
 2
 
 2
 $770 - $790 3,900 - 3,925
Southgate Bluffs at Austin Waters 2016 69
 26
 11
 32
 $560 - $880 3,100 - 4,400


Projects 
Year of
First
Delivery
(1)
 
Total
Number of
Homes in
Project
(2)
 Cumulative
Units Closed
as of
December 31, 2016
 Backlog at
December 31, 2016
 Lots as of December 31, 2016 Sales
Price Range
(in thousands)
 Home Size
Range
(sq. ft.)
Southgate Canals at Grand Park 2015 41
 8
 11
 22
 $690 - $950 3,900 - 5,000
Southgate Edgewood 2018 102
 
 
 102
 TBD TBD
Southgate Sunnyvale 2018 49
 
 
 49
 TBD TBD
Southgate Twin Creeks 2016 29
 2
 
 27
 $580 - $670 3,400 - 4,000
Future Developments at Twin Creeks 2018 570
 
 
 570
 $490 - $950 1,800 - 3,450
Texas Total 3,495
 793
 151
 2,551
    
Georgia:              
The Providence Group & Associates LLC 2013 17
 14
 
 3
 $690 - $730 3,700 - 4,400
The Providence Group Custom Homes LLC 2012 129
 113
 1
 15
 $800 - $850 3,800 - 4,200
TPG Homes at Bellmoore Park LLC 2015 618
 67
 13
 538
 $440 - $840 2,300 - 5,800
TPG Homes at Brookmere 2016 194
 27
 11
 156
 $330 - $675 2,000 - 4,300
TPG Homes at Byers Landing 2015 12
 12
 
 
 $340 - $385 2,100 - 2,700
TPG Homes at Central Park at Deerfield Township 2016 283
 19
 13
 251
 $435 - $625 2,000 - 4,200
TPG Homes at Chelsea Walk 2018 49
 
 
 49
 $475 - $575 2,000 - 2,800
TPG Homes at Cogburn 2016 19
 7
 3
 9
 $540 - $650 3,200 - 4,300
TPG Homes at Cresslyn 2017 49
 
 
 49
 $380 - $450 2,000 - 2,700
TPG Homes at Dunwoody Township 2016 40
 1
 4
 35
 $415 - $495 2,000 - 2,500
TPG Homes at East of Main 2017 83
 
 
 83
 $500 - $900 2,200 - 3,500
TPG Homes at East Village 2015 62
 37
 2
 23
 $320 - $380 2,000 - 2,400
TPG Homes at Rivers Edge 2015 120
 93
 12
 15
 $280 - $425 2,000 - 2,800
TPG Homes at Roswell Towneship 2016 92
 8
 5
 79
 $350 - $450 1,800 - 2,800
TPG Homes at Sugarloaf (Glens) 2016 92
 12
 4
 76
 $320 - $380 2,000 - 2,700
TPG Homes at Suwanee Station 2017 70
 
 
 70
 $300 - $350 2,000
TPG Homes at The Reserve at Providence 2015 37
 9
 
 28
 $950 - $1,100 3,700 - 5,800
TPG Homes at Townes at Chastain 2016 162
 3
 2
 157
 $400 - $590 1,800 - 2,200
TPG Homes at Traditions 2015 100
 51
 11
 38
 $400 - $725 2,300 - 4,700
TPG Homes – Highpointe at Vinings 2015 84
 36
 5
 43
 $515 - $750 2,800 - 4,200
Georgia Total   2,312
 509
 86
 1,717
    
               
Total Lots   5,807
 1,302
 237
 4,268
    
(1)Years subsequent to 2016 are anticipated.
(2)Number of homes is subject to change due to changes in zoning, building design, construction, and similar matters, including local regulations which impose restrictive zoning and density requirements in order to limit the number of homes that can eventually be built within the boundaries of a particular locality.



Project Sales by Market
The following table sets forth units sales revenue for our builder operations and units delivered to third party homebuilders by market for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Builder Operations Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 2014
Location 
Home
Sales
 Units Delivered 
Home
Sales
 Units Delivered 
Home
Sales
 Units Delivered
  (dollars in thousands)
Builder Operations (Homes)            
Texas Homes            
CB JENI Berkshire Place LLC $5,770
 22
 $12,752
 52
 $1,603
 7
CB JENI Brick Row Townhomes LLC $5,414
 17
 $6,030
 20
 $8,362
 36
CB JENI Grand Park $16,393
 47
 $1,581
 5
 $
 
CB JENI Hometown $4,873
 17
 $
 
 $
 
CB JENI Lake Vista Coppell LLC $
 
 $
 
 $3,771
 13
CB JENI Los Rios, LLC $6,260
 23
 $
 
 $
 
CB JENI McKinney Ranch, LLC $1,995
 8
 $
 
 $
 
CB JENI Mustang Park LLC $17,371
 56
 $14,950
 54
 $867
 3
CB JENI Pecan Park LLC $
 
 $4,583
 20
 $9,295
 43
CB JENI Raiford Crossing $13,419
 43
 $1,497
 5
 $
 
CB JENI Stacy Crossing, LLC $6,573
 22
 $
 
 $
 
CB JENI Viridian LLC $5,237
 21
 $9,900
 42
 $9,531
 42
Centre Living $4,645
 8
 $2,021
 2
 $869
 
Normandy Alto Vista Irving, LLC $
 
 $6,307
 12
 $4,963
 10
Normandy Cottonwood Crossing $12,542
 36
 $676
 2
 $
 
Normandy Homes Cypress Meadows LLC $19,240
 34
 $15,700
 28
 $2,107
 4
Normandy Homes Mustang Park $16,436
 34
 $1,307
 3
 $
 
Normandy Homes Viridan LLC $2,533
 7
 $7,951
 27
 $553
 2
Normandy Lake Vista Coppell $
 
 $2,582
 6
 $12,306
 29
Normandy Lakeside, LLC $13,513
 27
 $15,765
 28
 $10,802
 20
Normandy Pecan Park, LLC $
 
 $8,968
 22
 $4,266
 11
Normandy Twin Creeks $9,558
 23
 $
 
 $
 
Southgate $14,623
 20
 $9,409
 13
 $12,518
 12
Southgate Angel Field West $10,155
 15
 $
 
 $
 
Southgate Bluffs at Austin Waters $7,479
 11
 $
 
 $
 
Southgate Canals at Grand Park $6,251
 8
 $
 
 $
 
Southgate Twin Creeks $1,193
 2
 $
 
 $
 
Texas Homes Total $201,473
 501
 $121,979
 341
 $81,813
 232



Builder Operations Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 2014
Location 
Home
Sales
 Units Delivered 
Home
Sales
 Units Delivered 
Home
Sales
 Units Delivered
  (dollars in thousands)
Builder Operations (Homes)            
Georgia Homes            
Providence Luxury Homes $1,640
 1
 $3,183
 4
 $2,496
 4
The Providence Group Custom Homes LLC $2,469
 5
 $44,640
 72
 $18,363
 35
The Providence Group & Associates LLC $2,750
 4
 $1,871
 3
 $1,477
 3
TPG Homes at Abberley LLC $
 
 $
 
 $2,261
 8
TPG Homes at Bellmoore LLC $29,414
 49
 $11,070
 18
 $
 
TPG Homes at Bluffs at Lennox $8,332
 15
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Brookmere $11,333
 27
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Byers Landing $429
 1
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Central Park at Deerfield Township $9,682
 19
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Cogburn $4,351
 7
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Crabapple LLC $
 
 $849
 2
 $7,876
 21
TPG Homes at Dunwoody Township $466
 1
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at East Village $9,911
 29
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Highlands LLC $
 
 $2,650
 9
 $21,729
 75
TPG Homes at Jamestown LLC $
 
 $9,917
 34
 $27,985
 93
TPG Homes at LaVista Walk LLC $
 
 $
 
 $4,653
 15
TPG Homes at Nesbitt Reserve $440
 1
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Rivers Edge $19,978
 61
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Roswell Towneship $3,025
 8
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Ruths Farm $7,463
 10
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Seven Norcross $8,516
 23
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Sugarloaf (Glens) $4,129
 12
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at The Reserve at Providence $1,191
 1
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Three Bridges LLC $
 
 $15,508
 53
 $17,047
 63
TPG Homes at Townes at Chastain $1,459
 3
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Traditions $16,878
 33
 $
 
 $
 
TPG Homes at Whitfield Parc $1,017
 3
 $15,121
 45
 $7,347
 22
TPG Homes LLC $
 
 $27,479
 74
 $5,458
 16
TPG Homes – Highpointe at Vinings $18,818
 30
 $
 
 $
 
Georgia Homes Total $163,691
 343
 $132,288
 314
 $116,692
 355
Other            
Lot Sales Revenue(1)
 $
 
 
 
 2,145
 
Other Total $
 
 $
 
 $2,145
 
Homes Total $365,164
 844
 $254,267
 655
 $200,650
 587
(1)Lots owned and developed to build homes sold to a third party developer.



Land Development Year Ended December 31,
2016 2015 2014
Location Lot
Sales
 Units Delivered Lot
Sales
 Units Delivered Lot
Sales
 Units Delivered
  (dollars in thousands)
Land Development (Lots)   
   
   
   
   
   
Texas Lots            
Angel Field $167
 1
 $
 
 $
 
Bethany Mews $
 
 $265
 1
 $2,851
 17
Chateau du Lac $1,440
 5
 $1,770
 6
 $1,881
 7
Cypress Meadows $4,953
 37
 $4,772
 37
 $4,042
 33
Hamilton Hills $
 
 $��
 
 $1,103
 7
Hardin Lake $
 
 $1,505
 20
 $5,432
 75
Hawthorne Estates $
 
 $644
 6
 $2,806
 27
Inwood Hills $
 
 $
 
 $957
 15
Lakeside $215
 1
 $6,164
 61
 $9,602
 88
The Landings $4,329
 39
 $8,539
 81
 $5,184
 51
Mustang Park $1,986
 20
 $7,439
 76
 $11,594
 129
Twin Creeks $761
 8
 $5,780
 48
 $
 
Westside Circle $350
 1
 $
 
 $
 
Texas Lots Total $14,201
 112
 $36,878
 336
 $45,452
 449
Georgia Lots            
Reserve at Providence $250
 1
 $
 
 $
 
Ruth Farm $713
 4
 $
 
 $
 
Georgia Lots Total $963
 5
 $
 
 $
 
Lots Total $15,164
 117
 $36,878
 336
 $45,452
 449
             
Company Total (Homes and Lots) $380,328
 961
 $291,145
 991
 $246,102
 1,036



Owned and Controlled Lots
The following table presents the lots we owned or controlled as of December 31, 2016 and 2015. Owned lots are those to which we hold title, while controlled lots are those that we have the contractual right to acquire title but do not currently own. With respect to controlled lots, we generally enter into lot option contracts where an earnest money deposit of up to 20% of the total purchase price of the lots is deposited with the seller. The earnest money deposit is applied to the purchase price of the lots within the lot option contract. Certain of our lot option contracts require an escalation in lot price from zero to six percent per year. The length of the lot option contract is generally based upon the number of lots being purchased and the agreed upon lot takedown schedule, which determines the number and frequency of lot purchases. Lot option contracts typically require two to four lot purchases per month.

Lots Owned and Controlled
 December 31,
 2016 2015
Lots Owned(1)
   
Texas2,998
 2,659
Georgia1,237
 991
Total4,235
 3,650
Lots Controlled(1)
   
Texas554
 326
Georgia400
 758
Total954
 1,084
    
Total Lots Owned and Controlled(2)
5,189
 4,734
(1)The “land use” assumptions used in the above table may change over time.
(2)Total lots excludes homes under construction.

Acquisition Process
Our ability to identify, evaluate and acquire land in desirable locations and on favorable terms is critical to our success. We evaluate land opportunities based on risk-adjusted returns and employ a rigorous due diligence process to identify risks, which we then seek to mitigate if we pursue the property.

We often purchase land parcels from large, long-term landowners who sell portions of their land to benefit from our experience in planning and executing complex land development projects. We also purchase land from large real estate developers that recognize the benefit of working with an experienced and reputable developer and homebuilder. Additionally, we acquire land from owners that want to leverage our expertise in land entitlement so that the owners may later sell all or part of their land to us after entitlement. We also acquire land from other developers that want our controlled builders to build homes in their neighborhoods.

We also identify attractive properties that are typically located in existing prime neighborhood locations. We consider the existing and future supply of developable land before working to acquire the best-valued properties. Analysis includes development costs in addition to land costs. We have found that the prime quality infill locations have limited supply competition that may result in smaller value declines in down markets.

After contracting for a property, we perform due diligence to evaluate any environmental or geotechnical issues that may exist. We often seek to secure entitlements such as zoning or plat approval during this period. After title has been reviewed and approved the property is acquired. We manage and oversee all land development with our in-house staff.

Homebuilding, Marketing and Sales Process
TPG builds town homes and single family homes in the Atlanta market. TPG’s town homes range from 1,800 to 2,800 square feet, have two or more bedrooms and range in price from $280,000 to $600,000. TPG’s single family homes range from 2,000 to 4,600 square feet, have three or more bedrooms and range in price from $320,000 to $1.2 million. TPG’s luxury homes had over 3,700 square feet, four or more bedrooms and ranged in price from $1.0 million to $3.1 million. TPG has received


numerous industry awards, including the best master planned community by the Greater Atlanta Home Builders Association in 2016.

In the Dallas market our controlled builders construct townhomes, single family homes and luxury homes. CB JENI builds town homes with 1,400 to 2,600 square feet, two or more bedrooms and prices ranging from $230,000 to $400,000. Normandy constructs single family homes with square footage of over 1,800 square feet, three or more bedrooms and a price between $340,000 and $700,000. Southgate builds luxury homes that have over 3,100 square feet, four or more bedrooms and a price between $560,000 and $1.3 million. Southgate also acts as a contractor on homes up to $1.6 million. Centre Living builds homes and luxury townhomes, in premier centrally located neighborhoods in the Dallas market, that range from 1,400 to 4,000 square feet, two to three bedrooms and prices from $350,000 to more than $1.5 million. Centre Living also acts as a contractor on homes up to $2.5 million and on amenity centers for our other Dallas builders.


We offer a preferred lender referral program through our mortgage subsidiary to provide lending options to homebuyers in need of financing. We offer homeowners a comprehensive warranty on each home. Homes are generally covered by a ten yearten-year warranty for structural concerns, one year for defects and products used, two years for electrical, plumbing, heating, ventilation, and plumbing and ten years for HVACair conditioning parts and labor. Our Homeowner Services Department aims to respond to any questions or concerns from homebuyers within three business days.


We sell our homes through our owninternal sales representatives and also through independent real estate brokers. Our in-house sales force typically works from sales offices located in model homes close tonear or in each community. Sales representatives assist potential buyers by providing them with basic floor plans, price information, development and construction timetables, tours of model homes, and the selection of customization and upgrade options. Sales personnel are trained by us and generally have had prior experience selling new homes in the local market. Our personnel, along with subcontracted marketing and design consultants, carefully design the exterior and interior of each home to appeal to the lifestyles of targeted homebuyers. Additionally, we advertise through the use of model homes, Internet,social media, newspapers, billboards, real estate market publications, brochures, and newsletters.

Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes five to eight months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders are delivered. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occur during the third and fourth quarters. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.

Segments
In accordance with Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”) 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), an operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), or decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. The Company identified its CODM as three key executives—the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Head of Land Acquisition and Development. In determining the most appropriate reportable segments, the CODM considered similar economic and other characteristics, including geography, class of customers, product types and production processes. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company organized its operations into two reportable segments: builder operations and land development. The builder operations segment includes the Company's controlled builders results, which include building and selling single-family detached homes and townhomes that are designed and built to meet local customer preferences, and the sale of lots. Builder operations consisted of two operating segments: Texas and Georgia. The land development segment includes operations related to the acquisition and development of land which is sold to the Company’s controlled builders and third-party homebuilders.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company re-evaluated its reportable segments under ASC 280. As a result of the departure of the Chief Operating Officer in the fourth quarter of 2015, the management structure and CODM changed during 2016. The discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by the current CODM group is different than in the past. As such, the builder operations reportable segment now consists of three operating segments. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s operations are organized into two reportable segments: builder operations and land development. Builder operations consist of three operating segments: Texas, Georgia, and corporate and other. The operations of the Company's controlled builders were aggregated into the builder operations reporting segment because they have similar (1) economic


characteristics; (2) housing products; (3) class of homebuyer; (4) regulatory environments; and (5) methods used to construct and sell homes.

Corporate operations is a non-operating segment that develops and implements strategic initiatives and supports our builder operations and land development by centralizing certain administrative functions such as finance, treasury, information technology and human resources. The majority of corporate’s personnel and resources are primarily dedicated to activities relating to the builder operations segment. Therefore, any unallocated corporate expenses is included in the builder operations segment, within “Corporate and other”, which accounts for 96.1%, 87.3% and 81.4% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. While Green Brick Title’s operations are not economically similar to either the builder operations or land development, it did not meet the quantitative thresholds, as discussed in ASC 280, to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, Green Brick Title’s results are included within our builder operations segment within the “Corporate and other” operating segment.

All prior year segment information has been restated to conform with the 2016 presentation. The changes in the reportable segments have no effect on our consolidated balance sheets, statements of income or cash flows for the periods presented. Financial information about our segments appears in Note 13, “Segment Information,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Raw Materials

Typically, all the raw materials and most of the components used in our business are readily available in the United States. Most are standard items carried by major suppliers. However, a rapid increase in the number of homes started could cause shortages in the availability of such materials or in the price of services, thereby leading to delays in the delivery of homes under construction.homes. We continue to monitor the supply markets to achieve the best prices available. See “Risk Factors — - Labor and raw material shortages and price fluctuations could delay or increase the cost of land development and home construction, which could materially and adversely affect our business.


Corporate OrganizationSeasonality
The homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and Structurecapital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes five to nine months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders are delivered. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have


historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occur during the third and fourth quarters. We carry outexpect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.

Competition

Competition in the homebuilding industry is intense, and there are relatively low barriers to entry. Homebuilders compete for, among other things, homebuyers, desirable land parcels, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. Increased competition could hurt our business, generally throughas it could prevent us from acquiring attractive land parcels on which to build homes or make such acquisitions more expensive, hinder our market share expansion, and lead to pricing pressures on our homes that may adversely impact our revenues and margins. If we are unable to successfully compete, our business, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our competitors may independently develop land and construct housing units that are superior or substantially similar to our products. Furthermore, a number of project-specific, wholly-owned limited liability company subsidiaries. Our homebuilding operations business is conducted primarily through Builder Finance,our primary competitors are significantly larger, have a longer operating history and may have greater resources or lower cost of capital; accordingly, they may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of the land development operations conducts its business undermarkets in which we operate. Many of these competitors also have longstanding relationships with subcontractors and suppliers in the brand Green Brick Communities.markets in which we operate. We also compete for sales with individual resales of existing homes and with available rental housing.


Government Regulation and Environmental Matters

Our developments are subject to numerous local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, development, building design, construction and similar matters that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements, the result of which is to limit the number of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Projects that are not entitled may be subjected to periodic delays, changes in use, less intensive development or elimination of development in certain specific areas due to government regulations. We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in the future. Local governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development and service fees for projects in their jurisdiction. Projects for which we have received land use and development entitlements or approvals may still require a variety of other governmental approvals and permits during the development process and can also be impacted adversely by unforeseen health, safety and welfare issues, which can further delay these projects or prevent their development.


We are also subject to a variety of local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding site vary according to multiple factors, including the site’s location, its environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site, as well as adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs, and can prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding and land development activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas. In addition, in those cases where an endangered or threatened species is involved, environmental rules and regulations can result in the restriction or elimination of development in identified environmentally sensitive areas. From time to time, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and similar federal or state agencies review homebuilders’ compliance with environmental laws and may levy fines and penalties for failure to comply strictly with applicable environmental laws or impose additional requirements for future compliance as a result of past failures. Any such actions taken may increase our costs. Further, we expect that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on homebuilders and land developers in the future. Environmental regulations can also have an adverse impact on the availability and price of certain raw materials such as lumber.




Under various environmental laws, current or former owners of real estate, as well as certain other categories of parties, may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or petroleum product releases, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for related damages, including for bodily injury, and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination. Please see the “Risk Factors” section elsewherelocated in Part I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Competition
Competition in the homebuilding industry is intense, and there are relatively low barriers to entry into our business. Homebuilders compete for, among other things, homebuyers, desirable land parcels, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. Increased competition could hurt our business, as it could prevent us from acquiring attractive land parcels on which to build homes or make such acquisitions more expensive, hinder our market share expansion, and lead to pricing pressures on our homes that may adversely impact our revenues and margins. If we are unable to successfully compete, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our competitors may independently develop land and construct housing units that are superior or substantially similar to our products. Furthermore, a number of our primary competitors are significantly larger, have a longer operating history and may have greater resources or lower cost of capital; accordingly, they may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of the markets in which we operate. Many of these competitors also have longstanding relationships with subcontractors and suppliers in the markets in which we operate. We also compete for sales with individual resales of existing homes and with available rental housing.


Employees

As of December 31, 2016,2019, we had approximately 220460 employees, including those of our controlled builders. Although none of our employees are covered by collective bargaining agreements, certain of the subcontractors engaged by us or our affiliates are represented by labor unions or are subject to collective bargaining arrangements. We believe that our relations with our employees and subcontractors are good.


Offices and


Available Information
Our principal executive offices are located at 2805 Dallas Parkway, Ste 400, Plano, Texas 75093. Our telephone number is (469) 573-6755.
Our website address is www.greenbrickpartners.com. Our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the SEC.Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Our website and the information contained or incorporated therein are not intended to be incorporated into this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


Executive Officers and Directors
The following table sets forth certain information regarding our executive officers and directors as of March 13, 2017:

Executive Officers
NameAgePosition
James R. Brickman65Chief Executive Officer and Director
Richard A. Costello58Chief Financial Officer
Jed Dolson39Head of Land Acquisition and Development

James R. Brickman - Mr. Brickman has been our Chief Executive Officer and one of our directors since October 2014. Mr. Brickman was the founding manager and advisor of each of Capital since 2008 and Builder Finance since 2010. Mr. Brickman is responsible for all major investment decisions, capital allocation, strategic planning, and relationships with our controlled builders and lead investor. Prior to forming JBGL in 2008, Mr. Brickman was a manager of various joint ventures and limited partnerships that developed/built low and high rise office buildings, multifamily and condominium homes, single family homes, entitled land, and supervised a property management company. He previously also served as Chairman and CEO of Princeton Homes Ltd. and Princeton Realty Corporation that developed land, constructed single family custom homes, and managed apartments it built. Mr. Brickman has over 39 years’ experience in nearly all phases of real estate construction, development, and real estate finance property management. He received a B.B.A. and M.B.A. from Southern Methodist University.



Richard A. Costello - Mr. Costello has been our Chief Financial Officer since April 2015. From January 2015 until his appointment as Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Costello served as our Vice President of Finance. Mr. Costello has over 25 years of financial and operational experience in all aspects of real estate management. Since 2007, Mr. Costello has been a private investor. Previously, he worked for 16 years at GL Homes of Florida, one of the largest private developers and homebuilders in Florida. There he served as Chief Financial Officer and Chief Operating Officer as well as in other senior financial management roles. Prior to joining GL Homes, Mr. Costello worked for six years as AVP-Finance of Paragon Group, a regional commercial real estate developer, and for four years as an auditor for KPMG. Mr. Costello received a B.S. in Accounting from the University of Central Florida and his M.B.A. from Kellogg School of Northwestern University.

Jed Dolson - Mr. Dolson has been the Head of Land Acquisition and Development of the Company since October 2014. Prior to that time he was Head of Land Acquisition and Development of JBGL from September 2013. From March 2010 to September 2013, Mr. Dolson served as a managing member of Pecos One LLC, a consulting firm that provided services to JBGL. Prior to joining Capital, Mr. Dolson worked for three years at Jones & Boyd Engineering and later he served five years as Director of Development for a local private residential developer. Mr. Dolson received a B.S. degree in Civil Engineering from Texas A&M University and a M.S. in Civil Engineering from Stanford University.

Board of Directors
NameAgePosition
Elizabeth K. Blake65Director
Harry Brandler45Director
James R. Brickman65Chief Executive Officer and Director
David Einhorn48Chairman of the Board
John R. Farris44Director
Kathleen Olsen45Director
Richard S. Press78Director


ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS


Set forth below are the risks that we believe are material to our investors. Any of these risks could significantly and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations. You should carefully consider the risks described below, together with the other information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the information contained under the caption “Forward-Looking Statements.

Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may continue to be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock is highly volatile and could be subject to future fluctuations in response to a number of factors beyond our control. In recent years the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause declines in the market price of our common stock. The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our company or its performance, and those fluctuations could materially reduce our common stock price. Our share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. If we fail to meet expectations related to future growth, profitability, share repurchases or other market expectations, our stock price may decline significantly, which could have a material adverse impact on investor confidence and our stock price.

Certain large stockholders own a significant percentage of our shares and exert significant influence over us. Their interests may not coincide with ours and they may make decisions with which we may disagree.
Greenlight, Third Point, and James R. Brickman, together with certain members of Mr. Brickman’s family, beneficially own approximately 49.3%, 16.7% and 5.5%, respectively, of the voting power of the Company. These large stockholders, acting together, could determine substantially all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a sale or other change of control transaction. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of our company and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our interests as a company or the interests of other stockholders. Accordingly, these stockholders could cause us to enter into transactions or agreements that you would not approve or make decisions with which you may disagree.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.
We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, levels of indebtedness, statutory and contractual restrictions applying to the payment of dividends or contained in our financing instruments and other considerations that the board of directors deems relevant. Investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize a return on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.

Certain large stockholders’ shares may be sold into the market in the future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease significantly.
We believe that all or a significant portion of our common stock beneficially owned by Greenlight, Third Point and Mr. Brickman are “restricted securities” within the meaning of the federal securities laws because they were acquired from us on a private, non-registered basis. We have entered into registration rights agreements with each of these parties, however, that give these parties the right to require us to register the resale of their shares under certain circumstances. If these holders sell substantial amounts of these shares, the price of our common stock could decline. In addition, the sale of these shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

Though we may repurchase shares pursuant to our common stock share repurchase program, we are not obligated to do so and if we do, we may purchase only a limited number of shares of common stock.
In March 2016, our Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program for up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock. Although the Board of Directors has authorized a share repurchase program, the share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares.  The timing, prices, and sizes of repurchases will depend upon prevailing market prices, general economic and market conditions and other considerations.  Other considerations include our current and future priorities for the use of cash for other purposes such as investments in land, joint ventures and acquisitions.  We intend to purchase through open market transactions or in privately negotiated transactions, in accordance with applicable securities laws


and regulatory limitations, and any market purchases will be made during applicable trading window periods or pursuant to any applicable Rule 10b5-1 trading plans. Although we have announced a share repurchase program, we are not obligated to acquire any shares of our common stock, and holders of our common stock should not rely on the share repurchase program to increase their liquidity.  We may reduce or eliminate our share repurchase program in the future. The reduction or elimination of our share repurchase program, particularly if we do not repurchase the full number of shares authorized under the program, could adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

Risk Related to Our Tax Asset and Organizational Structure

Our ability to use net operating loss carryforwards to offset future taxable income for U.S. federal income tax purposes may be limited.
As of December 31, 2016, we reported federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $116.6 million, which will begin to expire, if not used, beginning with the year ending December 31, 2029.

For accounting purposes, a valuation allowance is required to reduce our potential deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of such assets will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. Based on the availability of historical financial results, projections of pre-tax book income and the assessment of available positive and negative information, management believes, on a more-likely-than-not basis, that the deferred tax assets will be realized in full. Accordingly, no valuation allowance has been recorded as of December 31, 2016 with respect to the federal net operating loss (“NOL”)Statements”.

Our ability to utilize our tax attributes, such as NOL carryforwards and tax credits (“Tax Attributes”), will be subject to significant limitation for federal income tax purposes if we undergo an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). For this purpose, an ownership change generally occurs, as of any “testing date” (as defined under Section 382 of the Code), if our “5-percent shareholders” have collectively increased their ownership in our common stock by more than 50 percentage points over their lowest percentage ownership at any time during the relevant testing period, which generally begins the later of either January 1, 2008 or three years preceding the relevant testing date. In general, our 5-percent shareholders would include any (i) individual who owns 5% or more (directly, indirectly or constructively) of our common stock and (ii) “public groups” who own our common stock (even in certain cases if they own less than 5% of our common stock) or stock in higher tier entities who own 5% or more (directly, indirectly or constructively) of our common stock. A “public group” generally consists of a group of persons each of whom owns (directly, indirectly or constructively) less than 5% of our common stock. An ownership change may therefore occur following substantial changes in the direct or indirect ownership of our outstanding stock by one or more 5-percent shareholders over this period.

If we were to experience an ownership change, Section 382 of the Code imposes an annual limitation on the amount of our post-change taxable income that may be offset by our pre-change Tax Attributes. The limitation imposed by Section 382 of the Code for any post-change year is generally determined by multiplying the value of our common stock immediately before the ownership change by the applicable long-term tax-exempt rate. Any unused annual limitation may, subject to certain limits, be carried over to later years.

To reduce the likelihood of an ownership change, our board of directors has implemented the Section 382 rights agreement, and our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (“Charter”) contains customary transfer and ownership limitations regarding preservation of our NOLs.

Our ability to utilize our Tax Attributes to reduce taxable income in future years may be limited for various reasons, including if our projected future taxable income is insufficient to recognize the full benefit of such Tax Attributes prior to their expiration and/or if the IRS successfully asserts that a transaction or transactions were concluded with the principal purpose of securing future tax benefits. There can be no assurance that we will have sufficient taxable income or that the IRS will not successfully challenge the use of our Tax Attributes to enable us to utilize the Tax Attributes in full before they expire.

Provisions in our charter documents may delay or prevent our acquisition by a third party or may reduce the value of your investment.
Some provisions in our Charter and bylaws may be deemed to have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, defer or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that a stockholder may deem to be in his or her best interest. For example, our board of directors may determine the rights, preferences, privileges and restrictions of unissued series of preferred stock without any vote or action by our stockholders. In addition, stockholders must provide advance notice to nominate directors or to propose business to be considered at a meeting of stockholders and may not take action by written consent. Additionally, both our 382 rights plan and our Charter contain transfer restrictions intended to prevent future acquisitions of our common stock that would


limit our ability to use the NOLs. The existence of these provisions could also limit the price that investors may be willing to pay in the future for shares of our common stock.


Risks Related to our Business and Industry


The homebuilding industry is cyclical. A severe downturn in the industry such as the one experienced in 2006 through 2011, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and stockholder’sstockholders’ equity.
The residential homebuilding industry is cyclical and is highly sensitive to changes in general economic conditions such as levels of employment, consumer confidence and income, availability of financing for acquisitions, construction and permanent mortgages, interest rate levels, inflation and demand for housing. Since early 2006, theThe U.S. housing market has beencould be negatively impacted by declining consumer confidence, restrictive mortgage standards and large supplies of foreclosures, resales and new homes, among other factors. When combined with a prolonged economic downturn, high unemployment levels, increases in the rate of inflation and uncertainty in the U.S. economy, these conditions have contributedcould contribute to decreased demand for housing, declining sales prices and increasing pricing pressure. While national data indicate that the overall demand for new homes improved during the year, inIn the event that the current recoverydemand for housing stalls or reverses and these economic and business trends continue or decline further,declines, we could experience declines in the market value of our inventory and demand for our lots, homes and construction loans, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.


Our operating performance is subject to risks associated with the real estate industry.
Real estate investments are subject to various risks and fluctuations and cycles in value and demand, many of which are beyond our control. Certain events may decrease cash available for operations, as well as the value of our real estate assets. These events include, but are not limited to:


adverse changes in international, national or local economic and demographic conditions;
adverse changes in financial conditions of buyers and sellers of properties, particularly residential homes and land suitable for development of residential homes;
competition from other real estate investors with significant capital, including other real estate operating companies and developers and institutional investment funds;
fluctuations in interest rates, which could adversely affect the ability of homebuyers to obtain financing on favorable terms or their willingness to obtain financing at all;
unanticipated increases in expenses, including, without limitation, insurance costs, development costs, real estate assessments and other taxes and costs of compliance with laws, regulations and governmental policies; and
changes in enforcement of laws, regulations and governmental policies, including, without limitation, health, safety, environmental, zoning and tax laws.


In addition, periods of economic slowdown or recession, rising interest rates or declining demand for real estate, or the public perception that any of these events may occur, could result in a general decline in the purchase of homes or an increased incidence of home order cancellations. If we cannot successfully implement our business strategy, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.


Further, acts of war, any outbreak or escalation of hostilities between the United States and any foreign power or acts of terrorism may cause disruption to the U.S. economy, or the local economies of the markets in which we operate, cause shortages of building materials, increase costs associated with obtaining building materials, result in building code changes that could increase costs of construction, affect job growth and consumer confidence or cause economic changes that we cannot


anticipate, all of which could reduce demand for our lots, homes and construction loans and adversely impact our business prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.


Our business and financial results could be adversely affected by significant inflation or deflation.
Inflation can adversely affect our homebuilding operations by increasing costs of land, financing, materials, labor and construction. While we attempt to pass on cost increases to homebuyers through increased prices, in a weak housing market, we may not be able to offset cost increases with higher selling prices. In addition, significant inflation is often accompanied by higher interest rates, which have a negative impact on housing demand. In a highly inflationary environment, depending on industry and other economic conditions, we may be precluded from raising home prices enough to keep up with the rate of inflation, which could reduce our profit margins. Moreover, with inflation, the costs of capital increase and the purchasing


power of our cash resources could decline. Current or future efforts by the government to stimulate the economy may increase the risk of significant inflation and its adverse impact on our business or financial results.


Alternatively, a significant period of deflation could cause a decrease in overall spending and borrowing levels. This could lead to a further deterioration in economic conditions, including an increase in the rate of unemployment. Deflation could also cause the value of our inventoriesinventory to decline or reduce the value of existing homes below the related mortgage loan balance, which could potentially increase the supply of existing homes and have a negative impact on our results of operations.


We are dependent on the continued availability and satisfactory performance of subcontractors which, if unavailable, could have a material adverse effect on our business.
We and our homebuilding subsidiaries conduct our land development and constructionhomebuilding operations onlyprimarily as a general contractor. Virtually all land development and construction work is performed by unaffiliated third-party subcontractors. As a consequence, the timing and quality of the development of our land and the construction of our homes depends on the availability and skill of our subcontractors. There may not be sufficient availability of and satisfactory performance by these unaffiliated third-party subcontractors in the markets in which we operate. In addition,If there are inadequate subcontractor resources, our ability to meet customer demands, both timing and quality, could be adversely affected which could have a material adverse effect on our business.reputation, our future growth and our profitability.


We have recently experienced labor shortages and increased labor costs in both the Dallas and Atlanta markets. These labor shortages have resulted in higher wages for subcontractors, construction workers frequently moving between jobs for higher pay, increased prices and delays in projects.

Labor and raw material shortages and price fluctuations could delay or increase the cost of land development and home construction, which could materially and adversely affect our business.
The residential construction industry experiences labor and raw material shortages from time to time, including shortages in qualified tradespeople and supplies ofsuch as insulation, drywall, cement, steel and lumber. These labor and raw material shortages can be more severe during periods of strong demand for housing if either of the regionsor during periods when a region in which we operate experiences a natural disaster that has a significant impact on existing residential and commercial structures. The cost of labor and raw materials may also be adversely affected during periods of shortage or high inflation. During the recent economic downturn, a large number of qualified tradespeople went out of business or otherwise exited the market in the Dallas and Atlanta regions. This reduction in available tradespeople exacerbated labor shortages as demand for new housing increased in these markets. Shortages and price increases could cause delays in, and increase our costs of, land development and home construction, which we may not be able to recover by raising home prices due to market demand and because the price for each home is typically set prior to its delivery pursuant to the agreement of sale with the homebuyer. In addition, the federal government has, at various times during 2018 and 2019, imposed tariffs on a variety of imports from foreign countries and may impose additional tariffs in turnthe future. Significant tariffs or other restrictions are placed on raw materials that we use in our homebuilding operation, such as lumber or steel, could cause the cost of home construction to increase which we may not be able to recover by raising home prices or which could slow our absorption due to being constrained by market demand. As a result, shortages or increased costs of labor and raw materials could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.


Failure to recruit, retain and develop highly skilled, competent employees may have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.
Key employees, including management team members at both the corporate and homebuilder subsidiary levels, are fundamental to our ability to obtain, generate and manage opportunities. If any of the management team members were to cease employment with us, our results of operations could suffer. Our ability to retain our management team or to attract suitable replacements should any members of its management team leave is dependent on the competitive nature of the employment market. The loss of services from key management team members or a limitation in their availability could materially and adversely impact our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations. Further, such a loss could be negatively perceived in the capital markets. In addition, we do not maintain key person insurance in respect of any member of our senior management team.named executive officers.


In addition, key employees working in the land development, homebuilding and construction industries are highly sought after. Experienced employees in the homebuilding, land acquisition and construction industries are fundamental to our ability to


generate, obtain and manage opportunities. In particular, local knowledge and relationships are critical to our ability to source attractive land acquisition opportunities. Failure to attract and retain such personnel or to ensure that their experience and knowledge is not lost when they leave the business through retirement, redundancy or otherwise may adversely affect the standards of our service and may have an adverse impact on our business, financial conditions and results of operations.


Our long-term success depends on our ability to acquire undeveloped land, partially-finishedpartially finished developed lots and finished lots suitable for residential homebuilding at reasonable prices, in accordance with our land investment criteria.
The homebuilding industry is highly competitive for suitable land and the risk inherent in purchasing and developing land increases asis directly impacted by changes in consumer demand for housing increases.housing. The availability of finished and partially-finishedpartially finished developed lots and undeveloped land for purchase that meet our investment criteria depends on a number of factors outside our control, including land availability, in general, competition with other homebuilders and land buyers, inflation in land prices, zoning, allowable


housing density, the ability to obtain building permits and other regulatory requirements. Should suitable land or lots become more difficult to locate or obtain, the number of lots we may be able to develop and sell could decrease, the number of homes we may be able to build and sell could be reduced and the cost of land could increase, perhaps substantially, which could adversely impact our results of operations.


As competition for suitable land increases, the cost of acquiring both finished and undeveloped lots and the cost of developing owned land could rise and the availability of suitable land at acceptable prices may decline, which could adversely impact our financial results. The availability of suitable land assets could also affect the success of our land acquisition strategy, which may impact our ability to increase the number of activelyactive selling communities, to grow our revenues and margins and to achieve or maintain profitability.


If we are unable to develop communities successfully or within expected timeframes, our results of operations could be adversely affected.
Before a community generates any revenue, time and material expenditures are required to acquire and prepare land, entitle and finish lots, obtain development approvals, pay taxes and construct significant portions of project infrastructure, amenities, model homes and sales facilities. It can take several years from the time that we acquire control of a property to the time that we make our first home sale on the site. Delays in the development of communities expose us to the risk of changes in market conditions for homes. A decline in our ability to develop and market our communities successfully and to generate positive cash flow from these operations in a timely manner could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations and on our ability to service our debt and to meet our working capital requirements.

Because real estate investments are relatively illiquid, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties for reasonable prices in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions may be limited and we may be forced to hold non-income producing properties for extended periods of time.


Real estate investments are relatively difficult to sell quickly.illiquid. As a result, our ability to promptly sell one or more properties in response to changing economic, financial and investment conditions ismay be limited and we may be forced to hold non-income producing assets for an extended period of time. We cannot predict whether we will be able to sell any property for the price or on the terms that we set or whether any price or other terms offered by a prospective purchaser would be acceptable to us. We also cannot predict the length of time needed to find a willing purchaser and to close the sale of a property.


We depend on the success of our partially owned controlled homebuilding subsidiaries.builders.
We participate in the homebuilding business, in part, through non-wholly owned subsidiaries, in which we own a 50% controlling interest, which we refer to as our “controlled builders.” We are able to exercise control over the operations of each controlled builder. We have entered into arrangements with these controlled builders in order to take advantage of thetheir local knowledge and relationships, of the controlled builders, acquire attractive land positions and brand images, manage our risk profile and leverage our capital base. TheEven though the co-investors in our controlled builders are subject to certain non-competition provisions, the viability of our participation in the homebuilding business depends on our ability to maintain good relationships with our controlled builders. Our controlled builders are focused on maximizing the value of their operations and working with a partner that can help them be successful. The effectiveness of our management, the value of our expertise and the rapport we maintain with our controlled builders are important factors for new builders considering doing business with us and may affect our ability to attract homebuyers, subcontractors, employees or others upon whom our business, financial condition and results of operations ultimately depend. Further, our relationships with our controlled builders generate additional business opportunities that support our growth. If we are unable to maintain good relationships with our controlled builders, we may be unable to fully take advantage of existing agreements or expand our relationships with these controlled builders. Additionally, our opportunities for developing new relationships withpursuing acquisitions of additional builders may be adversely impacted.


WeIn Dallas and Atlanta, we sell lots to our controlled builders for their homebuilding operations and provide them loans to finance home construction. If our controlled builders fail to successfully execute their business strategies for any reason, they


may be unable to purchase lots from us, repay outstanding construction finance loans made by us or borrow from us in the future, any of which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.


OurAn integral component of our growth strategy is the use of controlled builders’builders, joint ventures, partnerships and other strategic investments, and these counterparties’ interests may not be wholly aligned with ours or those of our investors.
Our controlled homebuilding subsidiaries, whichbuilders and the third parties with whom we refer to as our “controlled builders,”enter into partnerships, joint ventures or other strategic investments are separate and distinct entities from us, and while we own a 50% controlling interest in our controlled builders, providing us with a corresponding equity interest in their profits, our controlled builders are primarily focused on maximizing the value of their operations rather than our operations. Further, because our controlled builders are not wholly-owned, pursuant to each of their applicable operating agreements, we share decision-making authority with the other members of our controlled builders regarding certain major


decisions of our controlled builders. Our controlled buildersus. Consequently, these counterparties may have different economic, financial and industry positions from us which could influence their business decisions, including but not limited to strategic decision-making which they believe to be in their best interests. As a result of the foregoing, their business interests and strategiesbut which may conflict with or not be fully aligned with ours and those of our investors,shareholders. While we exercise different levels of control over the entities in which we invest or co-invest, our rights may be limited contractually or by statute and we may not be able to ensure that their decisions are in alignment with those of our investors. Disputes between us and these third parties could lead toresult in legal proceedings that would increase our expenses and prevent our officers and/or directors from focusing their time and effort on our business. If our counterparties take actions and results that are not in our or inbest interests it could have a material adverse effect on our investors', best interests. business and our profitability.


If we are required to either repurchase or sell a substantial portion of the equity interest in our controlled homebuilding subsidiaries, our capital resources and financial conditionliquidity could be adversely affected.
The operating agreements governing two of our partially owned controlled homebuilding subsidiariesbuilders contain buy-sell provisions that may be triggered in certain circumstances. In the event that a buy-sell event occurs, our builder will have the right to initiate a buy-sell process, which may happen at an inconvenient time for us. In the event the buy-sell provisions are exercised at a time when we lack sufficient capital to purchase the remaining equity interest, we may elect to sell our equity interest in the entity. If we are forced to sell our equity interest, we will no longer benefit from the future operations of the applicable entity. If a buy-sell provision is exercised and we elect to purchase the interest in an entity that we do not already own, we may be obligated to expend significant capital in order to complete such acquisition, which may result in our being unable to pursue other investments or opportunities. If either of these events occurs, our revenue and net income could decline or we may not have sufficient capital necessary to implement our growth strategy.


Our geographic concentration could materially and adversely affect us if the homebuilding industry in our current markets should decline.
Our business strategy is focused on the development of land, the issuance of construction finance loans and the design, construction and sale of single-family detached and attached homes in the Dallas and Atlanta markets, as well as the eventual entry into other attractive geographic markets. In Dallas, we principally operate in the counties of Dallas, Collin and Denton. In Atlanta, we principally operate in the counties of Fulton, Gwinnett, Cobb, Forsyth, Cherokee and Dekalb. In Florida, we principally operate in the counties of Indian River and St. Lucie. To the extent housing demand and population growth slow in our core markets, our favorable growth outlook may not be realized. Furthermore, we may be unable to compete effectively with the resale home market in our core markets. Because our operations are concentrated in these areas, a prolonged economic downturn in one or more of these areas could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations, and a disproportionately greater impact on us than other homebuilders with more diversified operations. Further, slower rates of population growth or population declines in the Dallas, Atlanta or AtlantaVero Beach markets, especially as compared to the high population growth rates in prior years, could affect the demand for housing, causing home prices in these markets to falldecline and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Our developments are subject to extensive government regulation, which could cause us to incur significant liabilities or restrict our business activities.
Our developments are subject to numerous local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning zoning, development, building design, construction and similar matters that impose restrictive zoning and density requirements, the result of which is to limit the number and type of homes that can be built within the boundaries of a particular area. Projects that are not yet entitled may be subjected to periodic delays, changes in use, less intensive development or elimination of development in certain specific areas due to government regulations. We may also be subject to periodic delays or may be precluded entirely from developing in certain communities due to building moratoriums or “slow-growth” or “no-growth” initiatives that could be implemented in the future. Local governments also have broad discretion regarding the imposition of development and service fees for projects in their jurisdiction. Projects for which we have received land use and development entitlements or approvals may still require a variety of other governmental approvals and permits during the development process and can also be impacted adversely by unforeseen health, safety and welfare issues, which can further delay these projects or prevent their development. As a result, lot and home sales could decline and costs could increase, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity,current results of operations and our long-term growth prospects.



Changes in global or regional environmental conditions and governmental actions in response to such changes may adversely affect us by increasing the costs of or restricting our planned or future growth activities.
There is growing concern from many members of the scientific community and the general public that an increase in global average temperatures due to emissions of greenhouse gases and other human activities have caused, or will cause, significant changes in weather patterns and increase the frequency and severity of natural disasters. Government mandates, standards or regulations intended to reduce greenhouse gas emissions or projected climate change impacts have resulted, and are likely to continue to result, in restrictions on land development in certain areas and increased energy, transportation and raw material costs. Governmental requirements directed at reducing effects on climate could cause us to incur expenses that we cannot recover or that will require us to increase the price of homes we sell to the point that it affects demand for those homes.

Our financial condition and results of operations.

Ifoperations may be adversely affected by and decrease in the market value of our land or homes declines as well as the associated carrying costs.
We continuously acquire land for replacement of land inventory and homes drops significantly,expansion within our profits would decrease.
Thecurrent markets, and may in the future acquire land for expansion into new markets. However, the market value of land, building lots and housing inventories can fluctuate significantly as a result of changing market conditions, and the measures we employ to manage inventory risk may not be adequate to insulate our operations from a severe drop in inventory values. We acquire land for replacement of land inventory and expansion within our current markets, and may in the future acquire land for expansion into new markets. If housing demand decreases below what we anticipated when we acquired our inventory, we may not be able to generate profits consistent with those we have generated in the past and we may not be able to recover our costs when we sell lots and homes. When market conditions are such that land values are not appreciating, option arrangements previously entered into may become less desirable, at which time we may elect to foregoforgo deposits and pre-acquisition costs and terminate such arrangements. In the face of adverse market conditions, we may have


substantial substantially higher inventory carrying costs, may have to write down our inventory to its fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principlesas a result of impairment and/or may have to sell land or homes at a loss. Any material write-downs of assets, or sales at a loss, could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.


The termsDemand for our homes and lots is dependent on the cost and availability of mortgage financing can affect consumer demand for homes and the ability of homebuyers to complete the purchase of a home. Because most of our homebuyers, and the homebuyers of those entities to whom we sell lots, finance the purchase of their homes, unfavorable terms in, or the unavailability of, mortgage financing could materially and adversely affect us.financing.
Our business depends on the ability of our homebuyers, as well as the ability of those who buy homes from the third-party homebuilding entities to which we sell lots (our “homebuilding customers”), to obtain financing for the purchase of their homes. Many of these homebuyers must sell their existing homes in order to buy a home from us or our homebuilding customers. Since 2009, the U.S. residential mortgage market as a whole has experienced significant instability due to, among other things, defaults on subprime and other loans, resulting in the declining market value of such loans. In light of these developments, lenders, investors, regulators and other third parties questioned the adequacy of lending standards and other credit requirements for several loan programs made available to borrowers in recent years. This has led to tightened credit requirements and an increase in indemnity claims for mortgages. Deterioration in credit quality among subprime and other nonconforming loans has caused most lenders to eliminate subprime mortgages and most other loan products that do not conform to Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”), Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac”), Federal Housing Administration (the “FHA”) or Veterans Administration (the “VA”) standards. Fewer loan products and tighter loan qualifications, in turn, make it more difficult for a borrower to finance the purchase of a new home or the purchase of an existing home from a potential “move-up” buyer who wishes to purchase a home from us or our homebuilding customers. If potential buyers of our or our homebuilding customers’ homes, or the buyers of those potential buyers’ existing homes, cannot obtain suitable financing, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

Interest rate increases or changes in federal lending programs or other regulations could lower demand for our lots, homes and construction finance loans, which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.
Rising interest rates, decreased availability of mortgage financing or of certain mortgage programs, higher down payment requirements or increased monthly mortgage costs may lead to reduced demand for our homes, lots and construction loans. Increased interest rates can also hinder our ability to realize our backlog because certain of our home purchase contracts provide homebuyers with a financing contingency. Financing contingencies allow homebuyers to cancel their home purchase contracts in the event that they cannot arrange for adequate financing. As a result, rising interest rates can decrease our home sales and mortgage originations. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.


In addition, as a result of the turbulence in the credit markets and mortgage finance industry, the federal government has taken on a significant role in supporting mortgage lending through its conservatorship of Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie MaeMae”) and Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation (“Freddie Mac,Mac”), both of which purchase home mortgages and mortgage-backed securities originated by mortgage lenders, and its insurance of mortgages originated by lenders through the FHAFederal Housing Administration (the “FHA”) and the VA.Veterans Administration (“VA”). The availability and affordability of mortgage loans, including consumer interest rates for such loans, could be adversely affected by a curtailment or cessation of the federal government’s mortgage-related programs or policies. The FHA may continue to impose stricter loan qualification standards, raise minimum down payment requirements, impose higher mortgage insurance premiums and other costs and/or limit the number of mortgages it insures. Due to growing federal budget deficits, the U.S. Treasury may not be able to continue supporting the mortgage-related activities of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, the FHA and the VA at present levels, or it may revise significantly the federal government’s participation in and support of the residential mortgage market. Because the availability of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac, FHA- and VA-backed mortgage financing is an important factor in marketing and selling many of our homes, any limitations, restrictions or changes in the availability of such government-backed financing could reduce our home sales, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.


Furthermore,Changes in July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reformmethod pursuant to which LIBOR rates are determined and Consumer Protection Act was signed into law. This legislation providespotential phasing out of LIBOR after 2021 may affect our financial results.
The United Kingdom Financial Conduct Authority (the “FCA”), which regulates the London Interbank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) has announced that the FCA intends to stop compelling banks to submit rates for a numberthe calculation of new requirements relating to residential mortgages and mortgage lending practices, manyLIBOR after 2021 (the “FCA Announcement”). The FCA Announcement indicates that the continuation of which are to be developed further by implementing rules. These include, among others, minimum standards for mortgages and lender practices in making mortgages, limitations on certain fees and incentive arrangements, retention of credit risk and remedies for borrowers in foreclosure proceedings. The effect of these provisions on lending institutions will dependLIBOR on the rules that are ultimately enacted. These requirements, however, ascurrent basis cannot and when implemented, are expectedwill not be guaranteed after 2021. Following the implementation of any reforms to reduceLIBOR or the availability of loans to borrowers and/or increase the costs to borrowers to obtain such loans. Any such reduction could result in a decline of our home sales, lot sales and construction finance loan portfolio which could materially and adversely affect our business and results of operations.methods pursuant





to which LIBOR rates are determined, or other benchmark rates that may be enacted in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, the manner of administration of such benchmarks may change, with the result that such benchmarks may perform differently than in the past, such benchmarks could be eliminated entirely, or there could be other consequences which cannot be predicted. Under our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, LIBOR may be used to set the fluctuating interest rate (the “Base Rate”) and the interest rate for any Eurodollar Rate Advance. If LIBOR is phased out, we may be required to renegotiate with our lender to establish a new interest rate (the “LIBOR Successor Rate”). We can give no assurance that we and our lender will be able to agree on a LIBOR Successor Rate. If we and our lender cannot agree on a LIBOR Successor Rate, our ability to draw upon the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility may be materially impacted.

Any increase in unemployment or underemployment may lead to an increase in the number of loan delinquencies and property repossessions, which would have an adverse impact on us.our business.
The unemployment rate in the United States was 4.7% as of December 2016, according to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (“BLS”). In addition, the labor force participation rate reported by the BLS has been declining, from 66.2% in January 2008 to 62.7% in December 2016, potentially reflecting an increased number of “discouraged workers” who have left the labor force. People who are not employed, are underemployed, who have left the labor force or are concerned about the loss of their jobs are less likely to purchase new homes, may be forced to try to sell the homes they own and may face difficulties in making required mortgage payments. Therefore, any increase in unemployment or underemployment may lead to an increase in the number of loan delinquencies and property repossessions and have an adverse impact on usour business both by reducing demand for our homes, lots and construction loans and by increasing the supply of homes for sale.


Any limitation on, or reduction or eliminationIncreases in the after-tax costs of tax benefits associated with owning a home would have an adverse effect on thecould prevent reduce demand for our homes lots and construction loans, which could be materiallots.
On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to our business.
Changesas the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act made major changes to the Internal Revenue Code that, in federal income tax laws maypart, affect demand for new homes. Current tax laws generally permit significant expenses associated withthe after-tax cost of owning a home, primarilyhome. Specifically, the Tax Act limited the ability of homebuyers to deduct (i) property taxes, (ii) mortgage interest, expense and real estate taxes,(iii) state and local income taxes. Due to be deducted for the purpose of calculating an individual’s federal and, in many cases, state taxable income. Various proposals have been publicly discussed to limit mortgage interest deductions and to limit the exclusion of gain from the sale of a principal residence. If such proposals were enacted without offsetting provisions,changes, the after-tax cost of owning a new home would increasehas increased for many of our potential homebuyers and the potential homebuyers of our homebuilding customers. EnactmentIn addition, if the federal government or a state government further changes its income tax laws to further eliminate or substantially limit these income tax deductions, the after-tax cost of any such proposal may have an adverse effect on the homebuilding industry in general, as theowning a new home would further increase for many of our potential customers. The loss or reduction of these homeowner tax deductions that have historically been available has and could decreasefurther reduce the perceived affordability of homeownership, and therefore the demand for and sales price of new homes.homes, including ours. In addition, increases in property tax rates or fees on developers by local governmental authorities, as experienced in response to reduced federal and state funding or to fund local initiatives, such as funding schools or road improvements, or increases in insurance premiums can adversely affect the ability of potential customers to obtain financing or their desire to purchase new homes, and can have an adverse impact on our business and financial results.


The occurrence of severe weather or natural disasters could increase our operating expenses and reduce our revenues and cash flows.
The climates and geology of the states in which we operate Georgia and Texas, present increased risks of severe weather and natural disasters. The occurrence of severe weather conditions or natural disasters can delay new home deliveries and lot development, reduce the availability of materials and/or negatively impact the demand for new homes in affected areas. For example, the winter of 2014 - 2015 brought severe weather conditions in the states in which we operate, including extreme rain in Atlanta and Dallas and abnormally low temperatures and icy conditions in the Dallas region, which hindered land development and delayed home construction.


Further, to the extent that hurricanes, severe storms, earthquakes, tornadoes, droughts, floods, wildfires or other natural disasters or similar events occur, our homes under construction or our building lots under development could be damaged or destroyed, which may result in losses exceeding our insurance coverage. Any of these events could increase our operating expenses, impair our cash flows and reduce our revenues. To the extent that climate change increases the frequency and severity of weather related disasters, we may experience increasing negative weather related impacts to our operations in the future.


High cancellation rates may negatively impact our business.
Our backlog reflects the number and value of homes for which we have entered into non-contingent sales contracts with homebuyers but not yet delivered. (While we may accept sales contracts on a contingent basis in limited circumstances, such contracts are not included in our backlog until the contingency is removed.) Although these sales contracts typically require a cash deposit, and do not allow for the sale to be contingent on the sale of the homebuyer's existing home, a homebuyershomebuyer may in certain circumstances cancel the contract and receive a complete or partial refund of the deposit as a result of local laws or contract provisions. If home prices decline, the national or local homebuilding environment or general economy weakens, our neighboring competitors reduce their sales prices (or increase their sales incentives), interest rates increase or the availability of mortgage financing tightens, homebuyers may have an incentive to cancel their contracts with us, even where they might be entitled to no refund or only a partial refund. Significant cancellations could have a material adverse effect on our business as a result of lost sales revenue and the accumulation of unsold housing inventory.




We may not be able to compete effectively against competitors in the homebuilding, land development and financial services industries.
Competition in the land development and homebuilding industries is intense, and there are relatively low barriers to entry. Land developers and homebuilders compete for, among other things, homebuyers, desirable land parcels, financing, raw materials and skilled labor. Increased competition could hurt our business, as it could prevent us from acquiring attractive land parcels for development and resale or homebuilding (or make such acquisitions more expensive), hinder our market share expansion and lead to pricing pressures that adversely impact itsour margins and revenues. If we are unable to compete


successfully, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. Our competitors may independently develop land and construct housing units that are superior or substantially similar to our products. Furthermore, a number of our primary competitors are significantly larger, have a longer operating history and may have greater resources or lower cost of capital than us. Accordingly, theycompetitors may be able to compete more effectively in one or more of the markets in which we operate. Many of these competitors also have longstanding relationships with subcontractors and suppliers in the markets in which we operate. Our homebuilding business also competes for sales with individual resales of existing homes and with available rental housing.


Our construction financing business competes with other lenders, including national, regional and local banks and other financial institutions, some of which have greater access to capital or different lending criteria and may be able to offer more attractive financing to potential homebuyers.


Our future growth may include additional strategic investments, joint ventures, partnerships and/or acquisitions of companies that may not be as successful as we anticipate and could disrupt our ongoing businesses and adversely affect our operations.
Our investments in our homebuilding subsidiaries have contributed to our historical growth and similar investments may be a component of our growth strategy in the future. We may make additional strategic investments, enter into new joint venture or partnership arrangements or acquire businesses, some of which may be significant. These endeavors may involve significant risks and uncertainties, including distraction of management from current operations, significant start-up costs, insufficient revenues to offset expenses associated with these new investments and inadequate return of capital on these investments, any of which may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Our failure to successfully identify and manage future investments, joint ventures, partnerships or acquisitions could harm our results of operations.


We may be unable to obtain suitable bonding for the development of our housing projects.
We are oftenperiodically required to provide bonds to governmental authorities and others to ensure the completion of our projects. As a result ofDepending on market conditions, surety providers have beenmay be reluctant to issue new bonds and some providers are requestingmay request credit enhancements (such as cash deposits or letters of credit) in order to maintain existing bonds or to issue new bonds. If we are unable to obtain required bonds for our future projects, or if we are required to provide credit enhancements with respect to our current or future bonds, our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.


Difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital could result in an inability to acquire land for our developments or increased costs and delays in the completion of development projects.
The homebuilding industry is capital-intensive and requires significant up-front expenditures to acquire land parcels and begin development. Land acquisition, development and construction activities may be adversely affected by any shortage or increased cost of financing or the unwillingness of third parties to engage in partnerships, joint ventures or other alternative arrangements.


WeIn addition to the financing provided by the senior unsecured notes, we currently have access to a senior secured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of up to $50.0 million and a senior unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of up to $85.0 million. As of December 31, 2016, we have $35.0 million of available borrowing capacity under the senior secured revolving credit facility and $10.0 million of available borrowing capacity under the senior unsecured revolving credit facility. Subject to certain terms and conditions, we may, prior to the termination of the senior unsecured revolving credit facility, increase the amount of such revolving credit facility up to a maximum aggregate amount of $110.0 million. We cannot assure youensure that we will be able to increaseextend the unsecured revolvingmaturity of these credit facility or extend its maturityfacilities or arrange another facility on acceptable terms or at all.


Furthermore, in the future, we may seek additional capital in the form of equity or debt financing from a variety of potential sources, including additional bank financings and/or securities offerings. The availability of borrowed funds, especially for land acquisition and construction financing, may be greatly reduced nationally, and the lending community may require increased amounts of equity to be invested in a project by borrowers in connection with both new loans and the extension of existing loans. The credit and capital markets have recently experienced significantare subject to volatility. If we are required to seek additional financing to fund our operations, continued volatility in these markets may restrict our flexibility to access such financing. If we are not successful in obtaining sufficient capital to fund our planned capital and other expenditures, we may be unable to acquire land for our housing developments and/or to develop the housing. Any difficulty in obtaining sufficient capital for planned


development expenditures could also cause project delays and any such delay could result in cost increases. Any one or more of the foregoing events could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, liquidity, financial condition and results of operations.

Our debt instruments contain limitations and restrictions that could prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and could adversely affect our growth.

Our revolving credit facilities and the terms of our senior unsecured notes impose certain restrictions on our and certain of our subsidiaries’ operations and activities and require us to maintain certain financial covenants. The most significant restrictions relate to debt incurrence (including non-recourse indebtedness), creation of liens, repayment of certain indebtedness prior to its respective stated maturity, sales of assets, cash distributions, (including paying dividends), capital stock repurchases, and investments by us and certain of our subsidiaries. These restrictions may prevent us from capitalizing on business opportunities and could adversely affect our growth.


The restrictions in our debt instruments could prohibit or restrict our and certain of our subsidiaries’ activities, such as undertaking capital raising or restructuring activities or entering into other transactions. In addition, if we fail to comply with these restrictions, an event of default could occur and our debt under these debt instruments could become due and payable prior to maturity. Any such event of default could lead to cross defaults under certain of our other debt or negatively impact other covenants. In any of these situations, we may be unable to amend the applicable instrument or obtain a waiver without significant additional cost, or at all. Any such situation could have a material adverse effect on our liquidity and financial condition.

We are subject to environmental laws and regulations, which may increase our costs, limit the areas in which we can build homes and develop land and delay completion of our projects.
We are subject to a variety of local, state, federal and other statutes, ordinances, rules and regulations concerning the environment. The particular environmental laws that apply to any given homebuilding or development site vary according to multiple factors, including the site’s location, its environmental conditions and the present and former uses of the site, as well as adjoining properties. Environmental laws and conditions may result in delays, may cause us to incur substantial compliance and other costs and can prohibit or severely restrict homebuilding and land development activity in environmentally sensitive regions or areas. In addition, in those cases where an endangered or threatened species is involved, environmental rules and regulations can result in the restriction or elimination of development in identified environmentally sensitive areas. From time to time, the United States Environmental Protection Agency and similar federal or state agencies review homebuilders’ compliance with environmental laws and may levy fines and penalties for failure to comply strictly with applicable environmental laws or impose additional requirements for future compliance as a result of past failures. Any such actions taken with respect to usour business may increase our costs. Further, we expect that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on homebuilders and land developers in the future. Environmental regulations can also have an adverse impact on the availability and price of certain raw materials such as lumber. Further, we expect that increasingly stringent requirements will be imposed on homebuilders and land developers in the future.


Under various environmental laws, current or former owners of real estate as well as certain other categories of parties, may be required to investigate and clean up hazardous or toxic substances, or petroleum product releases, and may be held liable to a governmental entity or to third parties for related damages, including for bodily injury, and for investigation and clean-up costs incurred by such parties in connection with the contamination.


A major health and safety incident relating to our business could be costly in terms of potential liabilities and reputational damage.
Building sites are inherently dangerous, and operating in the land development and homebuilding industries poses certain inherent health and safety risks. Due to health and safety regulatory requirements, and the number of projects we work on, health and safety performance is critical to the success of all areas of our business. Any failure in health and safety performance may result in penalties for non-compliance with relevant regulatory requirements, and a failure that results in a major or significant health and safety incident is likely to be costly in terms of potential liabilities incurred as a result. Such a failure could generate significant negative publicity and have a corresponding impact on our reputation, our relationships with relevant regulatory agencies or governmental authorities and our ability to attract employees, subcontractors and homebuyers, which in turn could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.


Poor relations with the residents of our communities, or with local real estate agents, could negatively impact our home sales, which could cause our revenues or results of operations to decline.
Residents of communities we develop rely on us to resolve issues or disputes that may arise in connection with the operation or development of their communities. Efforts made by us to resolve these issues or disputes could be deemed unsatisfactory by the affected residents and subsequent actions by these residents could adversely affect sales or our reputation.


In addition, we could be required to make material expenditures related to the settlement of such issues or disputes or to modify its community development plans, which could adversely affect our results of operations.


Most of our potential homebuyers engage local real estate agents thatwho are unaffiliated with us in connection with their search for a new home. If we do not maintain good relations with, and a good reputation among, these real estate agents, the agents may not encourage potential homebuyers to consider, or may actively discourage homebuyers from considering, our communities, which could adversely affect itsour results of operations.


Information technology failures and data security breaches could harm our business.
We use information technology and other computer resources to carry out important operational and marketing activities, as well as to maintain our business records,records. As part of our normal business activities, we may collect and store certain confidential information, including information provided byabout employees, homebuyers, customers, vendors and suppliers and may share information with vendors who assist us with certain aspects of our homebuyers.business. Many of these resources are provided to us and/or maintained on our behalf by third-party service providers pursuant to agreements that specify certain security and service level standards. Our ability to conduct our business may be impaired if these resources are compromised, degraded, damaged or fail, whether due to a virus or other harmful circumstance, intentional penetration or disruption of our information technology resources by a third party,third-party, natural disaster, hardware or software corruption or failure or error (including a failure of security controls incorporated into or applied to such hardware or software), telecommunications system failure, service provider error or failure, intentional or unintentional personnel actions (including the failure to follow our security protocols) or lost connectivity to networked resources. A significant and extended disruption

Breaches of our data security systems, including by cyber-attacks, could result in the functioningunintended public disclosure or the misappropriation of these resourcesour proprietary information or personal and confidential information, about our employees, consumers who view our homes, homebuyers or business partners, requiring us to incur significant expense to address and resolve such issues. The release of confidential information may also lead to identity theft and related fraud, litigation or other proceedings against us by affected individuals and/or business partners and/or regulators, and the outcome of such proceedings, which could damageinclude penalties or fines, and any significant disruption of our business could have a material and adverse effect on our reputation and cause us to lose homebuyers, customers, sales and revenue. We maintain insurance coverage for potential breaches but the costs to remedy a breach may not be fully covered by our insurance. We provide employee awareness training of cybersecurity threats and utilize information technology security experts to assist us in our evaluations of the effectiveness of the security of our information technology systems, and we regularly enhance our security measures to protect our systems and data. We use various encryption, tokenization and authentication technologies to mitigate cybersecurity risks and have increased our monitoring capabilities to enhance early detection and rapid response to potential cyber threats.




Product liability claims and litigation and warranty claims that arise in the ordinary course of business may be costly, which could adversely affect our business.
As a homebuilder, we are subject to construction defect and home warranty claims arising in the ordinary course of business. These claims are common in the homebuilding industry and can be costly. In addition, the costs of insuring against construction defect and product liability claims are high, and the amount of coverage offered by insurance companies is currently limited.high. This coverage may be further restricted and become more costly.costly in the future. If the limits or coverages of our current and former insurance programs prove inadequate, or we are not able to obtain adequate, or reasonably priced, insurance against these types of claims in the future, or the amounts currently provided for future warranty or insurance claims are inadequate, we may experience losses that could negatively impact our financial results.


Our business is seasonal in nature, so our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate.
Historically, theThe homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly results of operations and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes five to eightnine months to construct a new home, we deliver more homes in the second half of the year as spring and summer home orders convert to home deliveries. Because of this seasonality, homeshome starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highest in the second and third quarters, and the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occurs during the second half of the year. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although we may also be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.


Additionally, weather-related problems may occur, in the late winter and early spring, delaying starts or closings or increasing costs and reducing profitability. In addition, delays in opening new communities or new sections of existing communities could have an adverse impact on home sales and revenues. Expenses are not incurred and recognized evenly throughout the year. Because of these factors, our


quarterly results of operations may be uneven and may be marked by lower revenues and earnings in some quarters thancompared with others.

Shortages or extreme fluctuation in others.

Utilityavailability of natural resources and resource shortages or rate fluctuationsutilities could have an adverse effect on our operations.
The markets in which we operate may in the future be subject to utility andor other resource shortages, including significant changes to the availability of electricity and water. Shortages of natural resources in our markets, particularly of water, may make it more difficult for us to obtain regulatory approval of new developments. We have also experiencedmay experience material fluctuations in utility and resource costs across our markets, and we may incur additional costs and may not be able to complete construction on a timely basis if such fluctuations arise. Our lumber inventory is particularly sensitive to these shortages. Furthermore, these shortages and interest rate fluctuations may adversely affect the regional economies in which we operate, which may reduce demand for our homes, lots and construction loans and negatively affect our business and results of operations.


Our business and financial results could be adversely affected by the failure of persons who act on our behalf to comply with applicable regulations and guidelines.
Although we expect all of our employees, officers and directors to comply at all times with all applicable laws, rules and regulations, there may be instances in which subcontractors or others through whom we do business engage in practices that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines. Should we learn of practices relating to homes we build, lots we develop or financing we provide that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines, we would move actively to stop the non-complying practices as soon as possible and would take disciplinary action with regard to employees who were aware of the practices and did not take steps to address them, including in some instances terminating their employment. However, regardless of the steps we take after we learnslearn of practices that do not comply with applicable regulations or guidelines, we can in some instances be subject to fines or other governmental penalties, and our reputation can be injured, due to the practices having taken place.

We may become subject to litigation, which could materially and adversely affect us.
In the future, we may become subject to litigation, including claims relating to our operations and otherwise in the ordinary course of business. Some of these claims may result in significant defense costs and potentially significant judgments against us, some of which are not, or cannot be, insured against. We generally intend to vigorously defend ourselves. However, we cannot be certain of the ultimate outcomes of any claims that may arise in the future. Resolution of these types of matters may result in us having to pay significant fines, judgments, or settlements, which, if uninsured, or if the fines, judgments and settlements exceed insured levels, could adversely impact our earnings and cash flows, thereby materially and adversely affecting us. Certain litigation or the resolution of certain litigation may affect the availability or cost of some of our insurance


coverage, which could materially and adversely impact us, expose us to increased risks that would be uninsured, and materially and adversely impact our ability to attract directors and officers.


We may suffer uninsured losses or suffer material losses in excess of insurance limits.
We could suffer physical damage to property andor incur liabilities resulting in losses that may not be fully recoverable by insurance. In addition, certain types of risks, such as personal injury claims, may be, or may become in the future, either uninsurable or not economically insurable, or may not be currently or in the future covered by our insurance policies or otherwise be subject to significant deductibles or limits. Should an uninsured loss or a loss in excess of insured limits occur or be subject to deductibles, we could sustain financial loss or lose capital invested in the affected property as well as anticipated future income from that property. In addition, we could be liable to repair damage or meet liabilities caused by risks that are uninsured or subject to deductibles. We may be liable for any debt or other financial obligations related to affected property. Material losses or liabilities in excess of insurance proceeds may occur in the future.


The requirements of being a public company may strain our resourcesProducts supplied to us and distract our management, whichwork done by subcontractors can expose us to risks that could make it difficult to manageadversely affect our business.
PriorWe rely on subcontractors to perform the completionactual construction of the Transaction, JBGL had operated as a privately-held company since it began operationsour homes, and, in 2008. Since the consummation of the Transaction, we have been requiredsome cases, to comply with various regulatoryselect and reporting requirements, including those requiredobtain building materials. Despite our detailed specifications and quality control procedures, in some cases, subcontractors may use improper construction processes or defective materials. Defective products widely used by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Complying with these reporting and other regulatory requirements has been and will continue to be time-consuming and willhomebuilding industry can result in increased coststhe need to perform extensive repairs to large numbers of homes. The cost of complying with our warranty obligations may be significant if we are unable to recover the cost of repairs from subcontractors, materials suppliers and insurers.

Laws and regulations governing the residential mortgage industry could have a negativean adverse effect on our business and financial conditionresults. 
In 2018, we established a joint venture, Green Brick Mortgage, to provide mortgage related services to homebuyers. The residential mortgage lending industry remains under intense scrutiny and is heavily regulated at the federal, state and local levels. Although we do not originate mortgages, we are directly or indirectly subject to certain of these regulations. Changes to existing laws or regulations or adoption of new laws or regulations could require our joint venture to incur significant compliance costs. A material failure to comply with any of these laws or regulations could result in the loss or suspension of required licenses or other approvals, the imposition of monetary penalties, and restitution awards or other relief. Any of these outcomes could have an adverse effect on our results of operations.


As a public company, we are


Risks Related to Ownership of Our Common Stock

The price of our common stock may continue to be volatile.
The trading price of our common stock is highly volatile and could be subject to future fluctuations in response to a number of factors beyond our control. In recent years the reporting requirementsstock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. These fluctuations may be unrelated to the operating performance of particular companies. These broad market fluctuations may cause declines in the Exchange Act and the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (as amended, the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). These requirements may place a strain on our system and resources. The Exchange Act requires that we file annual, quarterly and current reports with respect to our business and financial condition. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires that we maintain effective disclosure controls and procedures and internal controls over financial reporting. To maintain and improve the effectivenessmarket price of our disclosure controlscommon stock. The price of our common stock could fluctuate based upon factors that have little or nothing to do with our company or its performance, and procedures,those fluctuations could materially reduce our common stock price. If we will needfail to commit significant resources, hire additional staff and provide additional management oversight. Since the consummation of the Transaction, we have been implementing additional procedures and processes for the purpose of addressing the standards and requirements applicablemeet expectations related to public companies. Sustainingfuture growth, profitability or other market expectations, our growth alsostock price may require us to commit additional management, operational and financial resources to identify new professionals to join us and to maintain appropriate operation and financial systems to adequately support expansion. These activities may divert management’s attention from other business concerns,decline significantly, which could have a material adverse effectimpact on investor confidence and our stock price.

Certain large stockholders own a significant percentage of our shares and exert significant influence over us. Their interests may not coincide with ours and they may make decisions with which we may disagree.
Greenlight Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (“Greenlight”) and James R. Brickman own approximately 48% and 4%, respectively, of the voting power of the Company. These large stockholders, acting together, could determine substantially all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions, such as a sale or other change of control transaction. In addition, this concentration of ownership may delay or prevent a change in control of our company and make some transactions more difficult or impossible without the support of these stockholders. The interests of these stockholders may not always coincide with our interests as a company or the interests of other stockholders. Accordingly, these stockholders could cause us to enter into transactions or agreements that you would not approve or make decisions with which you may disagree.

We do not intend to pay dividends on our business,common stock for the foreseeable future.
We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any payment of future dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors (“BOD”) and will depend upon, among other things, our earnings, financial condition, capital requirements, levels of indebtedness, statutory and resultscontractual restrictions applying to the payment of operations.dividends or contained in our financing instruments and other considerations that the BOD deems relevant. Investors must rely on sales of their common stock after price appreciation, which may never occur, as the only way to realize a return on their investment. Investors seeking cash dividends should not purchase our common stock.


Certain large stockholders’ shares may be sold into the market in the future, which could cause the market price of our common stock to decrease significantly.
We believe that all or a significant portion of our common stock beneficially owned by Greenlight and Mr. Brickman are “restricted securities” within the meaning of the federal securities laws because they were acquired from us on a private, non-registered basis. We have entered into registration rights agreements with each of these parties, however, that gives these parties the right to require us to register the resale of their shares under certain circumstances. If these holders sell substantial amounts of these shares, the price of our common stock could decline. In addition, the sale of these shares could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS


None.


ITEM 2. PROPERTIES


We lease our principal executive office inlocated at 2805 Dallas Parkway, Suite 400, Plano, Texas.Texas, 75093. Our homebuilding and title division offices are located in leased space in the markets where we conduct business. We believe that such properties are suitable and adequate to meet the needs of our businesses. OurBecause of the nature of our homebuilding operations, we and our builders hold significant amounts of property as inventory in connection with our homebuilding business. We discuss these properties are described in the discussion of our homebuilding operations in Part I, Item 1. “Business” under the headings “Our Homebuilding Projects1 and Owned and Controlled Lots”, which information is incorporated herein by reference.Part II, Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS


We are not involved in various claims and litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. We do not believe that any such claims and litigation will have a material litigation nor, toadverse effect upon our knowledge, is any material litigation threatened against the Company.results of operations or financial position.


ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES


Not Applicable.




PART II


ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES


Market Information
Our common stock trades on The Nasdaq Capital Market maintained by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC under the symbol “GRBK” (formerly “BIOF”). The following table sets forth the high and low closing prices for our common stock as reported on The Nasdaq Capital Market for the quarterly periods indicated. These prices do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions.
Year ended December 31, 2016 High Low
First Quarter $7.77
 $4.99
Second Quarter $7.80
 $6.67
Third Quarter $8.39
 $6.79
Fourth Quarter $10.40
 $7.65
Year ended December 31, 2015    
First Quarter $8.34
 $7.05
Second Quarter $10.95
 $8.20
Third Quarter $14.55
 $10.65
Fourth Quarter $12.13
 $6.64


Holders of Record
On March 6, 2017,2, 2020, there were approximately 27 stockholders of record of our common stock. We believe the number of beneficial owners of our common stock is substantially greater than the number of record holders because a large portion of our outstanding common stock is held of record in broker “street names” for the benefit of individual investors. As of March 6, 2017,2, 2020, there were 49,013,66250,488,010 common shares outstanding.


Dividends
We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently anticipate that we will retain all of our available cash for general corporate purposes. Payment of future dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directorsBOD and will depend on many factors, including general economic and business conditions, our strategic plans, our financial results and condition, legal requirements and other factors as our board of directorsBOD deems relevant.


Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
The following table provides information with respect to purchases by the Company of shares of our common stock during the three months ended December 31, 2016 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Total Number of Shares PurchasedAverage Price Paid Per Share
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs(1)
Maximum Number of Shares That May Yet Be Purchased Under Plans or Programs
October 1 - October 31, 2016
$

1,000
November 1 - November 30, 2016
$

1,000
December 1 - December 31, 2016
$

1,000
Total
$

1,000
(1)Our share repurchase program was approved by our Board of Directors in March 2016 and allows us to repurchase up to 1,000,000 shares of our common stock through 2017 or a determination by the Board to discontinue the repurchase program. The share repurchase program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares.



Performance Graph
The following graph compares our five-year cumulative total return, assuming $100 is invested on December 31, 2011, on our common stock with the cumulative total returns of the Russell 2000 Index, and the Nasdaq Composite Index for the periods ended December 31. The pre-Transaction prices of our common stock were adjusted for the $70.0 million Rights Offering, as described in Item 1. Business.
 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Green Brick Partners$100 $27.03 $12.61 $92.34 $81.08 $113.18
Russell 2000 Index$100 $114.63 $157.05 $162.6 $153.31 $183.17
Nasdaq Composite Index$100 $115.91 $160.32 $181.8 $192.21 $206.63

The above graph is based on our common stock and index prices calculated as of the last trading day before January 1 of the year-end periods presented. The closing price of our common stock on the Nasdaq Capital Market was $10.05 per share on December 31, 2016 and $7.20 per share on December 31, 2015. Total return assumes $100 invested at market close on December 31, 2011 in our common stock, the Russell 2000 Index, and the Nasdaq Composite Index. The performance of our common stock depicted in the graph above represents our past performance as an ethanol producer from December 31, 2011 to November 21, 2013, as a shell company with no substantial operations from November 22, 2013 to October 26, 2014, and as a real estate company since October 27, 2014. As a result, the performance of our common stock depicted in the graph above is not indicative of future performance or the historical performance of our current real estate business.

The information in the graph and table above is not “soliciting material,” is not deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate such information by reference.



ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA


The following table sets forth selectedNot applicable to smaller reporting companies.



FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This annual report on Form 10-K contains "forward-looking statements" within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements concern expectations, beliefs, projections, plans and strategies, anticipated events or trends and similar expressions concerning matters that are not historical financial information regarding our businessfacts. These forward-looking statements typically include the words “anticipate,” “believe,” “consider,” “estimate,” “expect,” “forecast,” “intend,” “objective,” “plan,” “predict,” “projection,” “seek,” “strategy,” “target,” “will” or other words of similar meaning. Some of them are opinions formed based upon general observations, anecdotal evidence and should be read in conjunction with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and our consolidated financialindustry experience, but that are not supported by specific investigation or analysis. Forward-looking statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.include statements concerning our belief that we have ample liquidity; our goals and strategies and their anticipated benefits; our intentions and the expected benefits and advantages of our product and land positioning strategies; our exposure to supplier concentration risk; our delivery of substantially all of our backlog existing as of year end; our positions and our expected outcome relating to litigation in general; the sufficiency of our warranty accruals; our intentions to not pay dividends; expectations regarding our industry and our business into 2020 and beyond, the demand for and the pricing of our homes; our land and lot acquisition strategy and potential expansion into new markets; the availability of labor and materials for our operations; the sufficiency of our insurance coverage and warranty accruals; the sufficiency of our capital resources to support our business strategy; the sufficiency of our land pipeline; the impact of new accounting standards and changes in accounting estimates; trends and expectations regarding sales prices, sales orders, cancellations, construction costs, gross margins, land costs and profitability and future home inventories; our future cash needs; the impact of seasonality; and our future compliance with debt covenants.


AsThese statements are necessarily subjective and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other important factors that could cause our actual results, performance or achievements, or industry results, to differ materially from any future results, performance or achievements described in Note 1or implied by such statements. Actual results may differ materially from expected results described in our forward-looking statements, including with respect to correct measurement and identification of factors affecting our consolidated financialbusiness or the extent of their likely impact, the accuracy and completeness of the publicly available information with respect to the factors upon which our business strategy is based or the success of our business. In addition, even if results are consistent with the forward-looking statements included elsewherecontained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, BioFuel Energy Corp. acquired JBGL Builder Finance LLCthose results may not be indicative of results or developments in subsequent periods. Furthermore, industry forecasts are likely to be inaccurate, especially over long periods of time and its consolidated subsidiariesin industries particularly sensitive to market conditions such as land development, homebuilding and affiliated companies (collectively “Builder Finance”),builder financing.

These forward-looking statements reflect our current views about future events and JBGL Capital Companies (“Capital”),are subject to risks, uncertainties and assumptions. We wish to caution readers that certain important factors may have affected and could in the future affect our actual results and could cause actual results to differ significantly from what is anticipated by our forward-looking statements. The most important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those anticipated by our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to: slowdowns in the real estate markets across the nation, including a combined groupslowdown in real estate markets in regions where we have significant homebuilding or multifamily development activities; increases in operating costs, including costs related to labor, construction materials, real estate taxes and insurance, which exceed our ability to increase prices; our inability to successfully execute our strategies; changes in general economic and financial conditions that reduce demand for our homes and finished lots, lower our profit margins or reduce our access to credit; our inability to acquire land at anticipated prices; the possibility that we will incur nonrecurring costs that affect earnings in one or more reporting periods; decreased demand for our homes and finished lots; increased competition for home sales from other sellers of commonly managed limited liability companiesnew and partnerships (collectively with Builder Finance, “JBGL”), on October 27, 2014. Becauseresale homes; increases in mortgage interest rates or tightening of mortgage lending practices; a decline in the acquisition was considered a reverse recapitalization for accounting purposes, the combined historical financial statementsvalue of JBGL became our historical financial statementsinventories and from the completionresulting write-downs of the acquisitioncarrying value of our real estate assets; the failure of the controlled builders or third parties with whom we enter into joint ventures, partnerships or other strategic investments; participants in various joint ventures to honor their commitments; difficulty obtaining land-use entitlements or construction financing; natural disasters and other unforeseen events for which our insurance does not provide adequate coverage; new laws or regulatory changes that adversely affect the profitability of our businesses; our inability to refinance our debt as it matures on October 27, 2014, theterms that are acceptable to us; and changes in accounting standards that adversely affect our reported earnings or financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis. Share and per share amounts have been retroactively restated to the earliest periods presented to reflect the transaction.condition.
 As of December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
 (in thousands)
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$35,157
 $21,207
 $22,976
 $16,683
 $7,164
Inventory410,297
 344,132
 275,141
 228,777
 132,571
Notes receivable, net
 
 
 7,556
 15,272
Deferred tax assets, net67,598
 80,663
 89,197
 
 
Other27,932
 27,874
 13,011
 15,392
 13,804
Total assets$540,984
 $473,876
 $400,325
 $268,408
 $168,811
Liabilities and stockholders equity
Borrowings on lines of credit$75,000
 $47,500
 $14,061
 $17,208
 $6,544
Notes payable10,948
 10,158
 12,151
 26,595
 21,442
Term loan facility
 
 150,000
 
 
Other53,551
 44,363
 42,516
 25,786
 19,137
Total liabilities139,499
 102,021
 218,728
 69,589
 47,123
Total stockholders’ equity401,485
 371,855
 181,597
 198,819
 121,688
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$540,984
 $473,876
 $400,325
 $268,408
 $168,811

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012
 (in thousands, except per share data)
Sale of residential units$365,164
 $254,267
 $200,650
 $168,591
 $50,105
Sale of land and lots15,164
 36,878
 45,452
 33,735
 22,927
Total revenues380,328
 291,145
 246,102
 202,326
 73,032
Cost of residential units283,454
 201,768
 153,799
 125,424
 40,668
Cost of land and lots10,499
 27,125
 34,082
 21,513
 15,256
Total cost of sales293,953
 228,893
 187,881
 146,937
 55,924
Total gross profit86,375
 62,252
 58,221
 55,389
 17,108
Salary expense and management fees expense - related party(21,871) (16,272) (12,694) (8,968) (3,467)
Selling, general and administrative expense(16,758) (13,704) (9,840) (6,406) (3,243)
Operating profit47,746
 32,276
 35,687
 40,015
 10,398
Interest expense
 (281) (1,393) (315) (351)
Other income, net2,808
 2,721
 1,915
 4,943
 10,896
Income before taxes50,554
 34,716
 36,209
 44,643
 20,943
Income tax provision (benefit)15,381
 9,171
 (24,853) 327
 231
Net income35,173
 25,545
 61,062
 44,316
 20,712
Less: net income attributable to non-controlling interests11,417
 10,220
 11,036
 12,309
 3,518
Net income attributable to controlling interests$23,756
 $15,325
 $50,026
 $32,007
 $17,194
          
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:         
Basic$0.49 $0.38 $3.40 $2.88 $1.55
Diluted$0.49 $0.38 $3.40 $2.88 $1.55
          
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:         
Basic48,879
 40,068
 14,712
 11,109
 11,109
Diluted48,886
 40,099
 14,712
 11,109
 11,109

ChangePlease see “Risk Factors” located in Classification
Certain indirect project costs previously classified as salary expense and selling, general and administrative expense have been classified as cost of residential units for the years ended December 31, 2015, 2014, 2013 and 2012 to properly present cost of residential units, salary expense, and selling, general and administrative expense. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewherePart I, Item 1A in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a further discussion.

Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts have been reclassifieddiscussion of these and other risks and uncertainties which could affect our future results. We undertake no obligation to conformrevise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of those statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events, except to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on previously reported operating resultsextent we are legally required to disclose certain matters in SEC filings or financial position.otherwise.





ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'SMANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS


You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our financial statementsFor business overview and the accompanying notes included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from the results discussed in or implied by any of the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those listed elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. See “Risk Factors” and “Forward-Looking Statements” above.

Reverse Recapitalization
On June 10, 2014, we entered into a definitive transaction agreement with the owners of JBGL Builder Finance LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies (collectively “Builder Finance”), and JBGL Capital Companies (“Capital”), a combined group of commonly managed limited liability companies and partnerships (collectively with Builder Finance, “JBGL”), which provided that we would acquire JBGL for $275.0 million, payable in cash and shares of our common stock (the “Transaction”). JBGL is a real estate operator involved in the purchase and development of land for residential use, construction lending and homebuilding operations. The Transaction was completed on October 27, 2014 (“Transaction Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction, we paid the $275.0 million purchase price with approximately $191.8 million in cash and the remainder in 11,108,500 shares of our common stock valued at approximately $7.49 per share.

The cash portion of the purchase price was primarily funded from the proceeds of a $70.0 million rights offering conducted by the Company (the $70.0 million includes proceeds from purchases of shares of common stock by certain funds and accounts managed by Greenlight Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (“Greenlight”) and Third Point LLC and its affiliates (“Third Point”)) and $150.0 million of debt financing provided by Greenlight pursuant to a loan agreement, with the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Loan Agreement”), which provided for a five year term loan facility (the "Term Loan Facility"). In 2015, the Term Loan Facility was repaid in full.

The $70.0 million rights offering included a registered offering by the Company of transferable rights to the public holders of its common stock, as of September 15, 2014 (the “Rights Offering”) to purchase additional shares of common stock. Each right permitted the holder to purchase, at a rights price ultimately equal to $5.00 per share of common stock, 2.2445 shares of common stock. 4,843,384 shares of common stock were purchased in the public Rights Offering for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $24.2 million.

In addition to the Rights Offering, Greenlight and Third Point participated in a private rights offering to purchase additional shares of common stock pursuant to commitment letters. Pursuant to its commitment letter, Third Point agreed to participate in the private rights offering for its full basic subscription privilege in the Rights Offering and to purchase, simultaneously with the consummation of the Rights Offering to the public, all of the available shares not otherwise sold in the Rights Offering following the exercise of all other public holders’ basic subscription privileges. Pursuant to such commitment letters, Greenlight purchased 4,957,618 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $24.8 million and Third Point purchased 4,198,998 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $21.0 million.

At the time the Transaction was completed, BioFuel Energy Corp. (“BioFuel”) was a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal operations and assets consisting of cash, deferred tax assets, and nominal other nonoperating assets. As a result of the Transaction the owners and management of JBGL gained effective operating control of the combined company.

Accordingly, for financial reporting purposes, the Transaction was deemed to be a capital transaction in substance and recorded as a reverse recapitalization of JBGL whereby JBGL is deemed to be the continuing, surviving entity for accounting purposes, but through reorganization, has deemed to have adopted the capital structure of BioFuel. Because the acquisition was considered a reverse recapitalization for accounting purposes, the combined historical financial statements of JBGL became our historical financial statements and, from the completion of the acquisition on October 27, 2014, the financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis. The assets and liabilities of BioFuel have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized in connection with the Transaction.

As a result of the Transaction, Green Brick changed its business direction and is now in the real estate industry. The financial statements set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for all periods prior to the reverse recapitalization are the historical financial statements of JBGL, and have been retroactively restated to give effect to the Transaction.



Equity Offering
On July 1, 2015, we completed an underwritten public offering of 17,000,000 shares of our common stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share and granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an aggregate of 841,500 additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments (the “Equity Offering”). On July 23, 2015, the underwriters exercised the option and purchased 444,897 additional shares. All of the shares were sold by us pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement previously filed with the SEC.

The Equity Offering resulted in net proceeds to us of approximately $170.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. On July 1, 2015, we used approximately $154.9 million of the net proceeds from the Equity Offering to repay all of the outstanding principal, interest and a prepayment premium under the Term Loan Facility. Upon repayment, the Term Loan Facility was terminated, and all security interests in, and all liens held by Greenlight with respect to, the assets of Green Brick securing the amounts owed under the Term Loan Facility were terminated and released. We used the remaining net proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes.

Overview of the Business
We are a uniquely structured company that combines residential land development and homebuilding. We acquire and develop land, provide land and construction financing to our controlled builders and participate in the profits of our controlled builders. Our core markets are in the high growth U.S. metropolitan areas of Dallas, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia. We are engaged in all aspects of the homebuilding process, including land acquisition and the development, entitlements, design, construction, marketing and sales and the creation of brand images at our residential neighborhoods and master planned communities. We believe we offer higher quality homes with more distinctive designs and floor plans than those built by our competitors at comparable prices. Our communities are located in premium locations in our core markets and we seek to enhance homebuyer satisfaction by utilizing high-quality materials, offering a broad range of customization options and building well-crafted energy-efficient homes. We seek to maximize value over the long term and operate our business to mitigate risks in the event of a downturn by controlling costs and quickly reacting to regional and local market trends.

We are a leading lot developer in the Dallas and Atlanta markets and believe that our strict operating discipline provides us with a competitive advantage in seeking to maximize returns while minimizing risk. We currently own or control over 5,200 home sites in premium locations in the Dallas and Atlanta markets. We consider premium locations to be lot supply constrained with high housing demand and where much of the surrounding land has already been developed. We are strategically positioned to either build new homes on our lots through our controlled builders or to sell finished lots to large unaffiliated homebuilders.

We sell finished lots or option lots from third-party developers to our controlled builders for their homebuilding operations and provide them with construction financing and strategic planning. Our controlled builders provide us with their local knowledge and relationships. We support our controlled builders by financing their purchases of land from us at an unlevered internal rate of return (“IRR”) of at least 20% and by providing construction financing at approximately a 13.8% interest rate. Our income is further enhanced by our 50% equity interest in the profits of our controlled builders. In addition, the land we sell to third-party homebuilders also typically generates an unlevered IRR of 20% or greater.

References to our “controlled builders” refer to our homebuilding subsidiaries in which we own at least a 50% controlling interest.
Our Controlled Builders
Year
Formed
MarketProducts OfferedPrices Ranges
The Providence Group of Georgia L.L.C. (“TPG”)2011AtlantaTownhomes$280,000 to $600,000
Single family$320,000 to $1.2 million
CB JENI Homes DFW LLC (“CB JENI”)2012DallasTownhomes$230,000 to $400,000
Single family$340,000 to $700,000
Centre Living Homes, LLC (“Centre Living”)2012DallasTownhomes$350,000 to more than $1.5 million
Contractor on luxury homesUp to $2.5 million
Southgate Homes DFW LLC (“Southgate”)2013DallasLuxury homes$560,000 to $1.3 million

During the first quarter of 2015, we formed Green Brick Title, LLC (“Green Brick Title”), our wholly-owned title company. Green Brick Title's core business includes title insurance, and closing and settlement services for our homebuyers. Green Brick Title had insignificant operationsdevelopments during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015.



Segments
In accordance with Accounting Standard Codification 280, Segment Reporting (“ASC 280”), an operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Maker (“CODM”), or decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. The Company identified its CODM as three key executives—the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer and the Head of Land Acquisition and Development. In determining the most appropriate reportable segments, the CODM considered similar economic and other characteristics, including geography, class of customers, product types and production processes. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company organized its operations into two reportable segments: builder operations and land development. The builder operations segment includes the Company's controlled builders results, which include building and selling single-family detached homes and townhomes that are designed and built2019, refer to meet local customer preferences, and the salePart I, Item 1 of lots. Builder operations consisted of two operating segments: Texas and Georgia. The land development segment includes operations related to the acquisition and development of land which is sold to the Company’s controlled builders and third-party homebuilders.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company re-evaluated its reportable segments under ASC 280. As a result of the departure of the Chief Operating Officer in the fourth quarter of 2015, the management structure and CODM changed during 2016. The discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by the current CODM group is different than in the past. As such, the builder operations reportable segment now consists of three operating segments. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s operations are organized into two reportable segments: builder operations and land development. Builder operations consist of three operating segments: Texas, Georgia, and corporate and other. The operations of the Company's controlled builders were aggregated into the builder operations reporting segment because they have similar (1) economic characteristics; (2) housing products; (3) class of homebuyer; (4) regulatory environments; and (5) methods used to construct and sell homes.

Corporate operations is a non-operating segment that develops and implements strategic initiatives and supports our builder operations and land development by centralizing certain administrative functions such as finance, treasury, information technology and human resources. The majority of corporate’s personnel and resources are primarily dedicated to activities relating to the builder operations segment. Therefore, any unallocated corporate expenses is included in the builder operations segment, within “Corporate and other”, which accounts for 96.1%, 87.3% and 81.4% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. While Green Brick Title’s operations are not economically similar to either the builder operations or land development, it did not meet the quantitative thresholds, as discussed in ASC 280, to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, Green Brick Title’s results are included within our builder operations segment within the “Corporate and other” operating segment.

All prior year segment information has been restated to conform with the 2016 presentation. The changes in the reportable segments have no effect on our consolidated balance sheets, statements of income or cash flows for the periods presented. Financial information about our segments appears in Note 13, “Segment Information,” of the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.


DefinitionsOverview and Outlook
In
Our key financial and operating metrics are home deliveries, home closings revenue, average sales price of homes delivered, and net new home orders, which refers to sales contracts executed reduced by the following discussion, “backlog”number of sales contracts canceled during the relevant period. During the year ended December 31, 2019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2018:
Home deliveries increased by 33.6%
Home closings revenue increased by 31.7%
Average sales price of homes delivered decreased by 1.4%
Net new home orders increased by 37.7%

From December 2018 to December 2019, homes in the Dallas and Atlanta markets appreciated by 2.6% and 4.1%, respectively (Source: S&P Dow Jones Indices & CoreLogic, December 2019). We believe that we operate in two of the most desirable housing markets in the nation. Among the 12 largest metropolitan areas in the country, the Dallas area ranked first and the Atlanta area ranked fifth in the annual rate of job growth from November 2018 to November 2019 (Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, November 2019). We believe that increasing demand and supply constraints in our target markets create favorable conditions for our future growth.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2019 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018

Residential Units Revenue and New Homes Delivered
The table below represents residential units revenue and new homes delivered for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 (dollars in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31,  
  2019 2018 Change %
Home closings revenue $752,273
 $571,177
 $181,096
 31.7%
Mechanic’s lien contracts revenue 7,557
 7,716
 (159) (2.1)%
Residential units revenue $759,830
 $578,893
 $180,937
 31.3%
New homes delivered 1,719
 1,287
 432
 33.6%
Average sales price of homes delivered $437.6
 $443.8
 $(6.2) (1.4)%

The $180.9 million increase in residential units revenue was driven by the 33.6% increase in the number of homes delivered, which was primarily due to an organic increase in the number of active selling communities during the year ended December 31, 2019, as well as the acquisition of GRBK GHO in April 2018. The 1.4% decline in the average sales price of homes delivered for the year ended December 31, 2019 was attributable to a change in product mix.



New Home Orders and Backlog
The table below represents new home orders and backlog related to our builder operations segments, excluding mechanic’s liens contracts (dollars in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31,  
  2019 2018 Change %
Net new home orders 1,923
 1,397
 526
 37.7%
Cancellation rate 12.9% 14.9% (2.0)% (13.4)%
Absorption rate per average active selling community per quarter 5.6
 5.3
 0.3
 5.7%
Average active selling communities 86
 66
 20
 30.3%
Active selling communities at end of period 95
 76
 19
 25.0%
Backlog $346,828
 $264,275
 $82,553
 31.2%
Backlog (units) 786
 582
 204
 35.1%
Average sales price of backlog $441.3
 $454.1
 $(12.8) (2.8)%

Backlog refers to homes under sales contracts that have not yet closed at the end of the relevant period, “cancellation rate”and absorption rate refers to the rate at which net new home orders are contracted per average active selling community during the relevant period. Upon a cancellation, the escrow deposit may be returned to the prospective purchaser. Accordingly, backlog may not be indicative of our future revenue.

Our cancellation rate, which refers to sales contracts canceled divided by sales contracts executed during the relevant period, “net new home orders” referswas 12.9% for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to new home sales contracts reduced by14.9% for the number of sales contracts canceled during the relevant period, and “overall absorption rate” refers to the rate at which net new home orders are contracted per selling community during the relevant period.year ended December 31, 2018. Sales contracts relating to homes in backlog may be canceled by the prospective purchaser for a number of reasons, such as the prospective purchaser’s inability to obtain suitable mortgage financing. Upon a cancellation, the escrow deposit may be returned to the prospective purchaser (other than with respect to certain design-related deposits, which we retain).purchaser. Accordingly, backlog may not be indicative of our future revenue.

Overview and Outlook
The following are our key operating metrics for the year ended December 31, 2016 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015: home deliveries increased by 28.9%, home sales revenue increased by 43.6%, average selling prices increased by 11.5%, backlog units increased by 17.9%, backlog units value increased by 22.6%, average sales price of homes in backlog increased by 4.0% and net new home orders increased by 36.0%. The increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog is the result of changes in product mix of homes contracted for sale during the period and local market appreciation. During the year ended December 31, 2016, homes in the Dallas and Atlanta markets appreciated by 8.1% and 6.1%,


respectively (Source: S&P/Case-Shiller 20-City Composite Home Price Index, November 2016). During the year ended December 31, 2016, the housing market continued to show signs of improvement, which we believe is driven by rising consumer confidence, lower interest rates, high affordability metrics, and a reduction in home inventory levels.

The following are our key operating metrics for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the same period in 2014: home deliveries increased by 11.6%, home sales revenue increased by 26.7%, average selling prices increased by 13.6%, backlog units decreased by 3.8%, backlog units value increased by 12.2%, average sales price of homes in backlog increased by 16.7% and net new home orders increased by 7.7%. The increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog was the result of changes in product mix related to higher priced single family homes over lower priced townhomes contracted for sale during the period and local market appreciation.

Our two primary markets, Dallas and Atlanta, have shown significant housing market recovery. We believe the housing market recovery is sustainable, and that we operate in two of the most desirable housing markets in the nation. Among the 12 largest metropolitan areas in the country, the Dallas metropolitan area ranked first in the rate of job growth and second in the number of jobs from September 2015 to September 2016 (Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, September 2016). The Atlanta metropolitan area has recorded employment gains of more than 50,000 each month, as compared to the same month in the prior year, since July 2013 (Source: US Bureau of Labor Statistics, November 2016). We believe that increasing demand and supply constraints in our target markets create favorable conditions for our future growth.

Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”), ASC and applicable regulations of the SEC. Our operating results for the year ended December 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for any future periods.

The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Results of Operations
Land Development
During the year ended December 31, 2016, our land development segment revenue decreased $21.7 million, or 58.9%, from $36.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 to $15.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016. The decrease was comprised of $24.0 million due to a 65.2% decrease in finished inventory lots delivered from 336 for the year ended December 31, 2015 to 117 for the year ended December 31, 2016, partially offset by an increase of $2.3 million related to an increase in the average sales price per lot of $129,603 per lot for the year ended December 31, 2016 from $109,756 per lot for the year ended December 31, 2015.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, our land development segment revenue decreased $8.6 million, or 18.9%, from $45.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2014 to $36.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was comprised of $11.4 million due to a 25.2% decrease in finished inventory lots delivered from 449 for the year ended December 31, 2014 to 336 for the year ended December 31, 2015, partially offset by an increase of $2.9 million related to an increase in the average sales price per lot of $109,756 per lot for the year ended December 31, 2015 from $101,229 per lot for the year ended December 31, 2014.

The decrease in finished inventory lots delivered is a result of a decrease in third party lot sales driven by an increase in intercompany lot sales to our controlled builders where revenue is not recognized until the home closes. While there is a time lag in when we can recognize intercompany lot sales, we believe this is advantageous because we are able to realize improved margins on the sale of completed homes and intercompany sales benefit our controlled builders.

Builder Operations
During the year ended December 31, 2016, our builder operations segment delivered 844 homes, with an average sales price of $432,659, compared to 655 homes with an average sales price of $388,194, during the same period in 2015. During the year ended December 31, 2016, our builder operations segment generated approximately $365.2 million in revenue compared to $254.3 million during the same period in 2015. For the year ended December 31, 2016, net new home orders totaled 880, a 36.0% increase from the same period in 2015. As of December 31, 2016, our builder operations segment had a backlog of 237 sold but unclosed homes, a 17.9% increase from the same period in 2015, with a total value of approximately $108.0 million,


an increase of $19.9 million, or 22.6%, from December 31, 2015. The increase in total value of backlog units reflects an increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog.

During the year ended December 31, 2015, our builder operations segment delivered 655 homes, with an average sales price of $388,194, compared to 587 homes with an average sales price of $341,823, during the same period in 2014. During the year ended December 31, 2015, our builder operations segment generated approximately $254.3 million in revenue compared to $200.7 million during the same period in 2014. For the year ended December 31, 2015, net new home orders totaled 647, a 7.7% increase from the same period in 2014. As of December 31, 2015, builder operations segment had a backlog of 201 sold but unclosed homes, a 3.8% decrease from the same period in 2014, with a total value of approximately $88.1 million, an increase of $9.6 million, or 12.2%, from December 31, 2014. The increase in value of backlog units reflects an increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog.

The increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog is the result of changes in product mix related to higher priced single family homes over lower priced townhomes closed during the period and local market appreciation. The average sales price of homes may increase or decrease depending on the mix of typical homes delivered and sold during such period and local market conditions. These changes in the average sales price of homes are part of our natural business cycle.

Revenues
We primarily generate revenue through (a) the sale of lots from our land development segment to public builders, large private builders and our controlled builders, (b) making first lien construction loans to our controlled builders, and (c) the closing and delivery of homes through our builder operations segment. We recognize revenue on homes and lots when completed and title to, and possession of, the property have been transferred to the purchaser.

All customer deposits are treated as liabilities. We also serve as the general contractor for certain custom homes where the customers, and not our company, own the underlying land and improvements. We recognize revenue for these contracts on the percentage of completion method.

Expenses
Lot acquisition, materials, other direct costs, interest and other indirect costs related to the acquisition, development, and construction of lots and homes are capitalized until the homes are complete, after which they are expensed. Direct and indirect costs of developing residential lots are allocated based on the relative sales price of the lots. Capitalized costs of residential lots are charged to earnings when the related revenue is recognized.

Salary Expense and Management Fees Expense - Related Party
Salary expense and management fees expense represents salaries, benefits, related party management fees and share-based compensation, and are recorded in the period incurred. We have not incurred any related party management fees since the Transaction Date.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense
Selling, general and administrative expense represents property taxes, depreciation, amortization, advertising and marketing, rent and lease expenses, and other administrative items, and are recorded in the period incurred.

Interest Expense
Interest expense consists primarily of interest costs incurred on our debt that is not capitalized and amortization of related debt issuance costs. We capitalize interest costs incurred to inventory during active development and other qualifying activities.

Other Income, Net
Other income, net consists of net revenue from contracts where we are the general contractor and where our customers own the land, and interest earned.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
Prior to the Transaction, JBGL consisted of entities that filed individualpartnership tax returns for federal income tax purposes. Several of the underlying entities were wholly-owned limited liability companies (“LLC’s”), and thus disregarded for federal income tax purposes, while several other entities had non-controlled interests, causing these LLC entities to be treated as regarded entities that filed partnership tax returns for federal income tax purposes. The Transaction resulted in the ownership


of JBGL by Green Brick, a corporate entity. Effectively, during the fourth quarter of calendar year 2014, JBGL and its wholly-owned LLC interests became disregarded for federal income tax purposes, taxable as a branch of the corporate entity. As such, the Transaction resulted in a change in tax status of the partnerships. The income tax effect of the change in tax status was recorded as an income tax benefit during the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2014.

We account for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. We regularly review historical and anticipated future pre-tax results of operations to determine whether we will be able to realize the benefit of deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax asset when it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income.

We establish reserves for uncertain tax positions that reflect our best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more-likely-than-not basis. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions have a more-likely-than-not chance of being sustained by the Company. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs.

As of December 31, 2016, in consideration of all available positive and negative evidence, including tax planning, management concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that all of our net deferred tax assets will be realized in accordance with U.S. GAAP, except for state income tax net operating loss carryforwards, for which a valuation allowance in the amount of $1.1 million has been recorded. Except for the valuation allowance pertaining to the state net operating losses, the valuation allowance previously recorded by BioFuel was reversed into additional paid-in-capital as of October 27, 2014. The valuation allowance reversal of approximating $63.9 million was recorded as part of the reverse recapitalization and had no effect on income tax expense.



Consolidated Financial Data
The consolidated historical financial data presented below reflect our land development and builder operations segments, and are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future period.

As described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, BioFuel acquired JBGL on October 27, 2014. The accounting treatment of the Transaction is reflected as a “reverse recapitalization,” whereby JBGL is the surviving accounting entity for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, our historical results for periods prior to the Transaction are the same as JBGL's historical results.
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
 (in thousands, except per share data)
Sale of residential units$365,164
 $254,267
 $200,650
Sale of land and lots15,164
 36,878
 45,452
Total revenues380,328
 291,145
 246,102
Cost of residential units283,454
 201,768
 153,799
Cost of land and lots10,499
 27,125
 34,082
Total cost of sales293,953
 228,893
 187,881
Total gross profit86,375
 62,252
 58,221
Salary expense and management fees expense - related party(21,871) (16,272) (12,694)
Selling, general and administrative expense(16,758) (13,704) (9,840)
Operating profit47,746
 32,276
 35,687
Interest expense
 (281) (1,393)
Other income, net2,808
 2,721
 1,915
Income before taxes50,554
 34,716
 36,209
Income tax provision (benefit)15,381
 9,171
 (24,853)
Net income35,173
 25,545
 61,062
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests11,417
 10,220
 11,036
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc.$23,756
 $15,325
 $50,026
      
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:    
Basic$0.49 $0.38 $3.40
Diluted$0.49 $0.38 $3.40
      
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:     
Basic48,879
 40,068
 14,712
Diluted48,886
 40,099
 14,712

Change in Classification
Certain indirect project costs previously classified as salary expense and selling, general and administrative expense have been classified as cost of residential units for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 to properly present cost of residential units, salary expense, and selling, general and administrative expense. See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.



Year Ended December 31, 2016 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2015
Net New Home Orders and Backlog
The table below represents new home orders and backlog related to our builder operations segment.
  Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
New Home Orders & Backlog 2016 2015 Change %
Net new home orders 880
 647
 233
 36.0%
Number of cancellations 135
 108
 27
 25.0%
Cancellation rate 13.3% 14.3% (1.0)% (7.0)%
Average selling communities 47
 41
 6
 14.6%
Selling communities at end of period 50
 43
 7
 16.3%
Backlog ($ in thousands) $108,030
 $88,136
 $19,894
 22.6%
Backlog (units) 237
 201
 36
 17.9%
Average sales price of backlog $455,823
 $438,488
 $17,335
 4.0%

Net new home orders for the year ended December 31, 2016 increased by 233 homes, or 36.0%, to 880 for the year ended December 31, 2016 from 647 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Our overall absorption rate for the year ended December 31, 2016 was an average of 18.6 per selling community (1.5 monthly), compared to an average of 15.7 per selling community (1.3 monthly) for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Our cancellation rate was approximately 13.3% for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared to 14.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015. Management believes a cancellation rate in the range of 15% to 20% is representative of an industry average cancellation rate. Nevertheless, on average, ourOur cancellation rate is on the lower end of the industry average, which we believe is due to our target buyer demographics which generally doeshave not includeincluded a significant amount of the first time homebuyers.

Backlog units increased by 36 homes, or 17.9%, to 237 as ofhomebuyers through December 31, 20162019.

Residential Units Gross Margin
The table below represents the components of residential units gross margin (dollars in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31,
  2019 2018
Home closings revenue $752,273
 100.0% $571,177
 100.0%
Cost of homebuilding units 591,321
 78.6% 427,164
 74.8%
Homebuilding gross margin $160,952
 21.4% $144,013
 25.2%
         
Mechanic’s lien contracts revenue $7,557
 100.0% $7,716
 100.0%
Cost of mechanic’s lien contracts 6,563
 86.8% 6,115
 79.3%
Mechanic’s lien contracts gross margin $994
 13.2% $1,601
 20.7%
         
Residential units revenue $759,830
 100.0% $578,893
 100.0%
Cost of residential units 597,884
 78.7% 433,279
 74.8%
Residential units gross margin $161,946
 21.3% $145,614
 25.2%

Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, the Company reclassified its sales commission expenses from 201 ascost of residential units to selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income in order to be more comparable with a majority of its peers. Sales commission expenses represented 4.2% and 4.1% of the residential units revenue for the years ended December 31, 2015. The dollar value2019 and 2018, respectively. Prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.



Cost of backlogresidential units increased $19.9 million, or 22.6%, to $108.0 million as of December 31, 2016 from $88.1 million as of December 31, 2015. The increase in value of backlog units reflects an increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog. Our average sales price of homes in backlog increased $17,335, or 4.0%, to $455,823 for the year ended December 31, 2016,2019 increased by $164.6 million, or 38.0%, compared to $438,488the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to the 33.6% increase in the number of new homes delivered, a change in mix of homes delivered, and a decrease in the number of homes built on self-developed lots.

Residential units gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog is the result of changes in product mix related2019 decreased to higher priced single family homes over lower priced townhomes contracted for sale during the period and local market appreciation. The average sales price of homes may fluctuate depending on the mix of typical homes delivered and sold during a period. The change in the average sales price of homes is part of our natural business cycle.

New Homes Delivered and Home Sales Revenue
The table below represents home sales revenue and new homes delivered related21.3%, compared to our builder operations segment.
  Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
New Homes Delivered and Home Sales Revenue 2016 2015 Change %
New homes delivered 844
 655
 189
 28.9%
Home sales revenue ($ in thousands) $365,164
 $254,267
 $110,897
 43.6%
Average sales price of home delivered $432,659
 $388,194
 $44,465
 11.5%

New home deliveries (excluding existing completed homes sold, but not yet closed)25.2% for the year ended December 31, 2016 for our builder operations segment was 844, compared2018 primarily because of lower initial prices on new communities opened and increases in sales incentives to new home deliveries of 655customers. Such sales incentives have contributed to an overall 31.3% increase in residential units revenue for the year ended December 31, 2015, resulting in an increase of 189 homes, or 28.9%. The increase in new home deliveries was primarily attributable2019 compared to a 14.6% increase in the average selling communities to 47 from 41.

Home sales revenue increased $110.9 million, or 43.6%, to $365.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $254.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. 2018.

Land and Lots Revenue
The increasetable below represents lots closed and land and lots revenue (dollars in thousands):
  Years Ended December 31,  
  2019 2018 Change %
Lots revenue $31,820
 $35,074
 $(3,254) (9.3)%
Land revenue 10
 9,680
 (9,670) (99.9)%
Land and lots revenue $31,830
 $44,754
 $(12,924) (28.9)%
Lots closed 211
 239
 (28) (11.7)%
Average sales price of lots closed $150.8
 $146.8
 $4.0
 2.7 %
The 9.3% decrease in lots revenue was compriseddriven by the 11.7% decrease in the number of (a) $73.4 millionlots closed, which was due to a 28.9% increase in homes delivered to 844us retaining more lots for our builders, partially offset by the year ended December 31, 2016, from 655 for the year ended December 31, 2015, and (b) $37.5 million resulting from an increase in average sales price of $44,465 per home to $432,659 for the year ended December 31, 2016, from $388,194 for the year ended December 31, 2015. The2.7% increase in the average sales price of


homes was the result of changes to the mix of homes delivered resultinglot price. The decrease in an increase in the number of single family homes delivered at higher price points compared to townhomes and local market appreciation.

Homebuilding
The table below represents cost of home sales and gross margin related to our builder operations segment.
  Years Ended December 31,
Homebuilding ($ in thousands) 2016 % 2015 %
Home sales revenue $365,164
 100.0% $254,267
 100.0%
Cost of home sales 283,454
 77.6% 201,768
 79.4%
Homebuilding gross margin $81,710
 22.4% $52,499
 20.6%

Cost of home sales for the year ended December 31, 2016 for builder operations was $283.5 million, compared to cost of home sales of $201.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, resulting in an increase of $81.7 million, or 40.5%, primarilyland revenue is due to the 28.9% increase in the numberlower volume of homes delivered. Homebuilding gross margin percentage for the year ended December 31, 2016 for builder operations was 22.4%, compared to a gross margin percentage of 20.6% for the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in homebuilding gross margin is largely due to the opening of new communitiesland sold during the year ended December 31, 2016. The increase in gross margin percentage is due primarily2019 compared to the consistent increase in
profitability of lot sales to our controlled builders, where revenue is not recognized until the home closes, and lower
amortization of capitalized interest during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Salary Expense and Management Fees Expense - Related Party
The table below represents salary expense, related to our land development and builder operations segments.
($ in thousands) Years Ended
December 31,
 As Percentage of
Relevant Revenue
2016 2015 2016 2015
Land development $324
 $809
 2.1% 2.2%
Builder operations $21,547
 $15,463
 5.9% 6.1%

Land Development
Salary expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 for land development was $0.3 million compared to $0.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of 60.0%. The decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in the average employee headcount of one for the year ended December 31, 2016 due to an employee who changed roles and was reported under land development during the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to builder operations during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Builder Operations
Salary expense for the year ended December 31, 2016 for builder operations was $21.5 million, compared to $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase of 39.3%. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in salaries driven an increase in the average employee headcount of 22 and the associated costs of benefits to support the growth in our builder operations segment. Salary expense as a percentage of related revenue decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of internal cost efficiencies, as many of our salary and benefits expense did not increase on a percentage basis as we scaled up our business through organic growth.

2018.
Selling, General and Administrative Expense
The table below represents the components of selling, general and administrative expenses related to our land development and builder operations segments.expense (dollars in thousands):
($ in thousands) 
Years Ended
December 31,
 As Percentage of
Relevant Revenue
2016 2015 2016 2015
 Years Ended December 31, As Percentage of Segment Revenue
 2019 2018 2019 2018
Builder operations $94,520
 $73,037
 12.4% 12.5%
Land development $1,039
 $1,470
 6.9% 4.0% 1,730
 3,147
 5.6% 7.9%
Builder operations $15,719
 $12,234
 4.3% 4.8%
Corporate, other and unallocated 2,409
 4,518
 % %
Total selling, general and administrative expense $98,659
 $80,702
 12.5% 12.9%




Land Development
Selling,The 0.4% decrease of total selling, general and administrative expense foras a percentage of revenue was driven by an increase in expenditures to support the year ended December 31, 2016 for land development was $1.0 million, compared to $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, a decrease of 29.3%. The decrease is primarily the result of a decreasegrowth in property tax expense. home sales, more than offset by an increase in revenues and in capitalized overhead adjustments.

Builder Operations
Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of related revenue increased for builder operations remained relatively flat. Builder operations expenditures include salary expenses, sales commissions, and community costs such as advertising and marketing expenses, rent, professional fees, and non-capitalized property taxes.

Land Development
The 2.3% decrease in selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of revenue for land development was primarily driven by an increase in capitalized property taxes during the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of a decrease in third party lot sales driven by an increase in intercompany lot sales2019 compared to our controlled builders where revenue is not recognized until the home closes.year ended December 31, 2018.


Builder OperationsCorporate, Other and Unallocated
Selling, general and administrative expense for the corporate, other and unallocated non-operating segment for the year ended December 31, 2016 for builder operations2019 was $15.7$2.4 million, compared to $12.2$4.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, an increase2018, the decrease driven primarily by transaction expenses related to a public secondary offering of 28.5%. The increase was primarily attributable tothe Company’s shares in 2018 and an increase in expenditurescapitalized overhead adjustments that are not allocated to support the growth in our builder operations business. Builder operations expenditures include community costs, such as, non-capitalized property taxes, rent expenses, professional fees, and advertising and marketing expenses. The average selling community count was 47land development segments.



Equity in Income of Unconsolidated Entities
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities increased to $9.8 million, or 35.1%, for the year ended December 31, 20162019, compared to 41 for the year ended December 31, 2015. Selling, general and administrative expense as a percentage of related revenue decreased for the year ended December 31, 2016, as a result of internal cost efficiencies, as many of our selling, general and administrative expense did not increase on a percentage basis as we scaled up our business through organic growth.

Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $0.3 million, or 100.0%, to $0.0$7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared2018, primarily due to $0.3an increase in earnings from GB Challenger, LLC and the formation of Green Brick Mortgage.

Other Income, Net
Other income, net, increased to $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease was due primarily2019, compared to an increase in the amount of capitalized interest during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Other Income, Net
Other income, net, increased slightly to $2.8$2.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, compared2018. The increase was primarily due to $2.7approximately $5.0 million in forfeited deposit monies on the sale of finished lots and an increase in title closing and settlement services.

Income Tax Expense
Income tax expense increased to $20.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Income Tax Provision
Income tax provision increased $6.2 million, or 67.7%, to $15.42019 from $17.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, from2018, driven by the increase in the projected effective tax rate, which was primarily attributable to the decrease in tax benefits related to noncontrolling interests and an expenseincrease in state income taxes.

As of $9.2 million forDecember 31, 2019, all federal net operating loss carryforwards were fully utilized.

During the year ended December 31, 2015. The increase in income tax provision is due to primarily to an increase in pre-tax book income.

As of December 31, 2016, we have federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $116.6 million, which will begin to expire beginning with the year ending December 31, 2029. Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards depends on the amount of taxable income we generate in future periods. Based on our historical taxable income results through December 31, 2016, as well as forecasted income, management expects that2019, the Company will generate sufficient taxable incomedecided to utilize all of the federal net operating loss carryforwards before they expire. The Company also has approximately $21.3 million ofwrite off its gross state net operating loss carryforwards having varying periodsin Minnesota of expiration which$13.7 million, as well as the Companyrelated deferred tax asset and valuation allowance. Management believes on a more-likely-than-not basis will not be utilized. The state loss carryforwards and related $1.1 million tax-effected valuation allowance were previously recorded by BioFuel. The Transaction had no effect onthat the state loss carryforward amount, the related valuation allowance or income tax expense. The Company maintains a deferred income tax asset in the amount of $1.1 million for the state loss carryforwards and a related valuation allowance in the amount of $1.1 million. In the Company’s assessment of the need for a valuation allowance, both positive and negative information was considered, including any available income tax planning.

As of December 31, 2016, we had deferred tax assets of $67.6 million, which was net of a valuation allowance in the amount of $1.1 million relating to state loss carryforwards. The deferred tax assets are primarily related to $40.8 million for federalMinnesota net operating loss carryforwards and $22.9 million for basis in partnerships. We evaluate the appropriateness of a valuation allowance in future periods based on the consideration of all available evidence, including the generation of taxable income, using the more-likely-than-not standard. A valuation allowance is required to reduce our deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of such assets willwould not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. As of December 31, 2016, management concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the net deferred tax assets, except for the state loss carryforwards noted above, will be realized in accordance with U.S. GAAP principles.have been utilized.




Year Ended December 31, 20152018 Compared to the Year Ended December 31, 20142017
Net New Home OrdersFor discussion and Backlog
The table below represents new home orders and backlog related to our builderanalysis of the Company’s results of operations segment.
  Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
New Home Orders & Backlog 2015 2014 Change %
Net new home orders 647
 601
 46
 7.7%
Number of cancellations 108
 106
 2
 1.9%
Cancellation rate 14.3% 15.0% (0.7)% (4.7)%
Average selling communities 41
 30
 11
 36.7%
Selling communities at end of period 43
 33
 10
 30.3%
Backlog ($ in thousands) $88,136
 $78,552
 $9,584
 12.2%
Backlog (units) 201
 209
 (8) (3.8)%
Average sales price of backlog $438,488
 $375,847
 $62,641
 16.7%

Net new home orders for the year ended December 31, 2015 increased by 46 homes, or 7.7%,2018 as well as for comparison to 647the Company’s results of operations for the year ended December 31, 2015 from 6012017, refer to Item 7 of Part II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our overall absorption rate for the year ended December 31, 2015 was an average of 15.7 per selling community (1.3 monthly), compared to an average of 20.0 per selling community (1.7 monthly) for the year ended December 31, 2014. Our monthly absorption rate decreased in part due to the timing of the opening of new communities and the closing out of existing communities.2018. 

Our cancellation rate was approximately 14.3% for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to 15.0% for the year ended December 31, 2014. Management believes a cancellation rate in the range of 15% to 20% is representative of an industry average cancellation rate. Nevertheless, on average, our cancellation rate is on the lower end of the industry average, which we believe is due to our target buyer demographics, which generally does not include first time homebuyers.

Backlog units decreased by 8 homes, or 3.8%, from 209 as of December 31, 2014 to 201 as of December 31, 2015. The dollar value of backlog units increased $9.6 million, or 12.2%, to $88.1 million as of December 31, 2015 from $78.6 million as of December 31, 2014. The increase in value of backlog units reflects an increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog. Our average sales price of homes in backlog increased $62,641, or 16.7%, to $438,488 for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $375,847 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in the average sales price of homes in backlog is the result of changes in product mix related to higher priced single family homes over lower priced townhomes contracted for sale during the period and local market appreciation. The average sales price of homes may fluctuate depending on the mix of typical homes delivered and sold during a period. The change in the average sales price of homes is part of our natural business cycle.

New Homes Delivered and Home Sales Revenue
The table below represents home sales revenue and new homes delivered related to our builder operations segment.
  Years Ended December 31, Increase (Decrease)
New Homes Delivered and Home Sales Revenue 2015 2014 Change %
New homes delivered 655
 587
 68
 11.6%
Home sales revenue ($ in thousands) $254,267
 $200,650
 $53,617
 26.7%
Average sales price of home delivered $388,194
 $341,823
 $46,371
 13.6%

New home deliveries (excluding existing completed homes sold, but not yet closed) for the year ended December 31, 2015 for our builder operations segment was 655, compared to new home deliveries of 587 for the year ended December 31, 2014, resulting in an increase of 68 homes, or 11.6%. The increase in new home deliveries was primarily attributable to the a 36.7% increase in the average selling communities to 41 from 30.

Home sales revenue increased $53.6 million, or 26.7%, to $254.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $200.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in revenue was comprised of (a) $27.2 million resulting from an increase in average sales price of $46,371 per home to $388,194 for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $341,823 for the year ended December 31, 2014, and (b) $26.4 million due to a 11.6% increase in homes delivered to 655 for the year


ended December 31, 2015, from 587 for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in the average sales price of homes was the result of changes to the mix of homes delivered resulting in an increase in the number of single family homes delivered at higher price points compared to townhomes and local market appreciation.

Homebuilding
The table below represents cost of home sales and gross margin related our builder operations segment.
  Years Ended December 31,
Homebuilding ($ in thousands) 2015 % 2014 %
Home sales revenue $254,267
 100.0% $200,650
 100.0%
Cost of home sales 201,768
 79.4% 153,799
 76.7%
Homebuilding gross margin $52,499
 20.6% $46,851
 23.3%

Cost of home sales for the year ended December 31, 2015 for builder operations was $201.8 million, compared to cost of home sales of $153.8 million on for the year ended December 31, 2014, resulting in an increase of $48.0 million, or 31.2%, primarily due to the 11.6% increase in the number of homes delivered. Homebuilding gross margin percentage for the year ended December 31, 2015 for builder operations was 20.6%, compared to a gross margin percentage of 23.3% for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase in homebuilding gross margin is largely due to the opening of new communities during the year ended December 31, 2015. The decrease in gross margin percentage is due to the unusually large number of home closings in several high margin communities during the year ended December 31, 2014, and to a substantial number of home closings in existing communities being closed out and the amortization of capitalized interest during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Salary Expense and Management Fees Expense - Related Party
The table below represents salary expense, related to our land development and builder operations segments.
($ in thousands) Years Ended
December 31,
 As Percentage of
Relevant Revenue
2015 2014 2015 2014
Land development $809
 $1,479
 2.2% 3.3%
Builder operations $15,463
 $11,215
 6.1% 5.6%

Land Development
Salary expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 for land development was $0.8 million compared to $1.5 million, for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 45.3%. The decrease is primarily the result of a decrease in employee headcount of three.

Builder Operations
Salary expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 for builder operations was $15.5 million, compared to $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 37.9%. The increase was primarily the result of an increase in salaries driven by JBGL going from a privately-held company to a public company, the associated costs of benefits to support the growth in our builder operations segment, and an increase in employee headcount of 54.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense
The table below represents selling, general and administrative expenses related to our land development and builder operations segments.
($ in thousands) 
Years Ended
December 31,
 As Percentage of
Relevant Revenue
2015 2014 2015 2014
Land development $1,470
 $2,410
 4.0% 5.3%
Builder operations $12,234
 $7,430
 4.8% 3.7%



Land Development
Selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 for land development was $1.5 million, compared to $2.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, a decrease of 39.0%. The decrease was primarily attributable to costs incurred in connection with the Transaction during the year ended December 31, 2014.

Builder Operations
Selling, general and administrative expense for the year ended December 31, 2015 for builder operations was $12.2 million, compared to $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, an increase of 64.7%. The increase was primarily attributable to an increase in expenditures to support builder operations in anticipation of future growth in our business, and additional costs of JBGL going from a privately-held company to a public company. Builder operations expenditures include community costs, such as, non-capitalized property taxes, rent expenses, professional fees, and advertising and marketing expenses. The average selling community count is 41 for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to 30 for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Interest Expense
Interest expense decreased $1.1 million, or 79.8%, to $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, compared to $1.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease was due primarily to an increase in the amount of capitalized interest during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Other Income, Net
Other income, net, increased $0.8 million, or 42.1%, to $2.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, from $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The increase was due to a $1.8 million increase in various other income and a decrease in various other expense, partially offset by a $0.8 million decrease in interest on direct financing leases income and a decrease in interest and fees income due to no notes receivable outstanding during the year ended December 31, 2015.

Income Tax Provision (Benefit)
Income tax benefit decreased $34.0 million, or 136.9% for the year ended December 31, 2015, from a benefit of $24.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2014. The decrease in income tax benefit is due to primarily to the recognition of a $26.6 million income tax benefit relating to the change in tax status of the JBGL entities during the year ended December 31, 2014, from pass through entities to taxable entities, relating primarily to the tax attributes that arose from the Transaction.

As of December 31, 2015, we have federal net operating loss carryforwards of approximately $158.9 million, which will begin to expire beginning with the year ending December 31, 2029. Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards depends on the amount of taxable income we generate in future periods. Based on our historical taxable income results through December 31, 2015, as well as forecasted income, management expects that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize all of the federal net operating loss carryforwards before they expire. The Company also has approximately $21.6 million of gross state net operating loss carryforwards having varying periods of expiration which the Company believes on a more-likely-than-not basis, will not be utilized. The state loss carryforwards and related $1.2 million tax-effected valuation allowance were previously recorded by BioFuel. The Transaction had no effect on the state loss carryforward amount, the related valuation allowance or income tax expense. The Company maintains a deferred income tax asset in the amount of $1.2 million for the state loss carryforwards and a related valuation allowance in the amount of $1.2 million. In the Company’s assessment of the need for a valuation allowance, both positive and negative information was considered, including any available income tax planning.

As of December 31, 2015, we had deferred tax assets of $80.8 million, which was net of a valuation allowance in the amount of $1.2 million relating to state loss carryforwards. The deferred tax assets are primarily related to $55.6 million for federal net operating loss carryforwards and $24.8 million for basis in partnerships. We evaluate the appropriateness of a valuation allowance in future periods based on the consideration of all available evidence, including the generation of taxable income, using the more-likely-than-not standard. A valuation allowance is required to reduce our deferred tax assets if it is determined that it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of such assets will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. As of December 31, 2015, management concluded that it was more-likely-than-not that the net deferred tax assets, except for the state loss carryforwards noted above, will be realized in accordance with U.S. GAAP principles.




Lots Owned and Controlled
The following table below representspresents the lots we owned andor controlled, (including landincluding lot option agreements)contracts, as of December 31, 2016, 20152019 and 2014.December 31, 2018. Owned lots are those tofor which the Company holdswe hold title, while controlled lots are those thatlots past feasibility studies for which we do not hold title but have the contractual right to acquire title but does not currently own it.title.
 December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Lots Owned(1)
     
Texas2,998
 2,659
 2,105
Georgia1,237
 991
 1,211
Total4,235
 3,650
 3,316
Lots Controlled(1)(2)
     
Texas554
 326
 279
Georgia400
 758
 561
Total954
 1,084
 840
      
Total Lots Owned and Controlled(1)
5,189
 4,734
 4,156
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Lots owned   
Central4,223
 4,447
Southeast2,196
 1,788
Total lots owned6,419
 6,235
Lots controlled  
   
Central1,410
 853
Southeast1,147
 990
Total lots controlled2,557
 1,843
Total lots owned and controlled (1)
8,976
 8,078
Percentage of lots owned71.5% 77.2%
 
(1)The land use assumptions used in the above table may change over time.
(2)Lots controlledTotal lots excludes lots with homes under construction.


The increase in the number of lots controlled is related to the formation of Trophy in Dallas in September 2018.

Liquidity and Capital Resources Overview
As of December 31, 20162019 and 2015,December 31, 2018, we had $35.2$33.3 million and $21.2$38.3 million of unrestricted cash, and cash equivalents, respectively. Management believes that we have a prudent cash management strategy, including with respect toconsideration of cash outlays for land and inventorylot acquisition and development. We intend to generate cash from the sale of inventory, and intend to redeploy the net cash generated from the sale of inventory to acquire and develop land and lots that represent opportunities to generate desired margins. We may also use cash to make share repurchases or additional investments in business acquisitions, joint ventures, or other strategic activities. Due to seasonality, we typically deliver more homes in the second half of the year which leads to the majority of cash receipts from home deliveries occurring during the second half of the year. Cash and cash equivalents increased as of December 31, 2016 compared to December 31, 2015 due to the increase in homes delivered during the second half of the year ended December 31, 2016.




Our principal uses of capital for the year ended December 31, 20162019 were operating expenses,home construction, land purchases, land development, home constructionoperating expenses, and the payment of routine liabilities. We used funds generated by operations and available borrowings to meet our short-term working capital requirements. We remain focused on generating positive margins in our builder operations segmentsegments and acquiring desirable land positions in order to maintain a strong balance sheet and remain poised for continued growth.


Cash flows for each of our communities depend on theirthe community’s stage in the development cycle and can differ substantially from reported earnings. Early stages of development or expansion require significant cash outlays for land acquisitions, entitlements and other approvals, and construction of model homes, roads, utilities, general landscaping and other amenities. Because theseThese costs are a component of our inventory and are not recognized in our statement of income until a home closes, we incur significant cash outlays prior to recognition of earnings.closes. In the later stages of community development, cash inflows may significantly exceed earnings reported for financial statement purposes, as the cash outflowoutflows associated with home construction and land construction wasdevelopment previously incurred. We are actively acquiring and developing lots in our primary markets in order to maintain and grow our lot supply.occurred.


On August 31, 2016, we entered into a first amendment to our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility (as defined below), which added Flagstar Bank, FSB as a lender under the Credit Agreement (as defined below), with an initial commitment of $20.0 million, which increased the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $40.0 million to $60.0 million. The first amendment also increased the maximum amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility to a maximum aggregate amount of $110.0 million. On December 1, 2016, we entered into a second amendment to our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, which extended the termination date to December 14, 2019 and pursuant to which Citibank, N.A. increased its commitment from $25.0 million to $35.0 million which increased the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $60.0 million to $70.0 million. On March 6, 2017, Flagstar Bank increased its commitment under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $20.0 million to $35.0 million,


which increased the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $70.0 million to $85.0 million.

As a result of the first and second amendments under our Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, ourOur debt to total capitalization ratio, which is calculated as the sum of borrowings on lines of credit and the senior unsecured notes, net of debt issuance costs, divided by the total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity, was approximately 18%31.3% as of December 31, 2016.2019. It is our intent to prudently employ leverage to continue to invest in our land acquisition, development and homebuilding businesses. We intend to target a debt to total capitalization ratio of approximately 35%30% to 40%35%, which we expect will continue to provide us with significant additional growth capital.


Revolving Credit Facilities
AsThe Company’s key sources of liquidity were funds generated by operations and provided by lines of credit and issuance of senior unsecured notes during the year ended December 31, 2019. Borrowings on lines of credit outstanding, net of debt issuance costs, as of December 31, 2016, we had2019 and December 31, 2018 consisted of the following lines of credit (“LOC”)(in thousands):

On July 30, 2015, we replaced our $25.0 million
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Secured revolving credit facility$38,000
 $46,500
Unsecured revolving credit facility128,000
 155,500
Debt issuance costs, net of amortization(1,358) (1,614)
Total borrowings on lines of credit, net$164,642
 $200,386

Borrowings on the secured revolving credit facility withhave a new revolving credit facility with Inwood, which provides for up to $50.0 million. The costs associated with the new revolving credit facilitymaturity date of $0.4 million were deferredMay 1, 2022 and are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets. We are amortizing these debt issuance costs to interest expense over the term of the new revolving credit facility using the straight line method. Amounts outstanding under the new revolving credit facility is secured by mortgages on real property and security interests in certain personal property (to the extent that such personal property is connected with the use and enjoyment of the real property) that is owned by certain of our subsidiaries, including land owned in John’s Creek, Georgia, Allen, Texas, and Carrollton, Texas. The amounts outstanding under the new revolving credit facility are also guaranteed by certain of our subsidiaries.

Before the amendment (as discussed below), the new revolving credit facility was subject to a borrowing base limitation equal to the sum of 50% of the total value of land and 60% of the total value of lots owned by certain of our subsidiaries, each as determined by an independent appraiser, with the value of land being restricted from being more than 50% of the borrowing base. Outstanding borrowings under the new revolving credit facility bear interest payable monthly at a floating rate per annum equal to the rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., from time to time, as its “Prime Rate” (the “Index”) with such adjustments to the interest rate being made on the effective date of any change in the Index.less 0.25%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the interest may not, at any time, be less than 4% per annum or more than the lesser amount of 18% and the highest maximum rate allowed by applicable law. The entire unpaid principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable on the maturity date. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 4.0% per annum. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.

On May 3, 2016, we amended the new revolving credit facility. The amendedsecured revolving credit facility is subject to a borrowing base limitation equal towas 4.50% per annum.

Borrowings on the sum of 50% of the total value of land and 65% of the total value of lots owned by certain of our subsidiaries, each as determined by an independent appraiser, with the value of land being restricted from being more than 65% of the borrowing base. Beginning on August 1, 2017, a non-usage fee equal to 0.25% of the average unfunded amount of the $50.0 million commitment amount over a trailing 12 month period is due on or before August 1st of each year during the term of the amended revolving credit facility. The maturity date has been extended to May 1, 2019. The costs associated with the amendment of $0.1 million were deferred and are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets. See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further discussion.

Under the terms of the new revolving credit facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain minimum multiples of net worth in excess of the outstanding new revolving credit facility balance, minimum interest coverage and maximum leverage.

On December 15, 2015, we entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, providing for a senior, unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitmentshave a maturity date of up to $40.0 million (“Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility”). Before the First Amendment (as defined and discussed below) increased the maximum amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, we could, at our option and subject to certain terms and conditions, prior to the termination date, increase the amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility up to a maximum aggregate amount of $75.0 million. Before the Second Amendment (as defined and discussed below), commitments under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility were available until the period ending December 14, 2018. Citibank, N.A. and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch initially committed to provide $25.02021 for $17.9 million and $15.0December 14, 2022 for $110.1 million, respectively.



The costs associated with the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility of $0.5 million were deferredrespectively, and are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets. We are amortizing these debt issuance costs tobear interest expense over the term of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility using the straight line method.

The Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility provides for interestat a floating rate options on advances at rates equal to either: (x) in the case ofeither (a) for base rate advances, the highest of (i) Citibank’s(1) the lender’s base rate, (ii)(2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (iii)(3) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%, in each case plus 1.5%; or (y)(b) in the case of Eurodollar rate advances, the reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 2.5%. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility is payable in arrears quarterly on the last day of each March, June, September and December during such periods. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the interest raterates on outstanding borrowings under the Credit Facility was 3.3%unsecured revolving credit facility ranged from 4.25% to 4.30% per annum.


We will pay the lenders a commitment fee on the amountSenior unsecured notes, net of the unused commitments on a quarterly basis at a rate per annum equal to 0.45%.

Outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility are subject to, among other things, a borrowing base. The borrowing base limitation is equal to the sum of: 100% of unrestricted cash (in excess of $15.0 million); 85% of the book value of model homes, construction in progress homes, sold completed homes,debt issuance costs, were $73.4 million and speculative homes (subject to certain limitations on the age and number of speculative homes and model homes); 65% of the book value of finished lots and land under development; and 50% of the book value of entitled land (subject to certain limitations on the value of entitled land and land under development as a percentage of the borrowing base).

On August 31, 2016, we entered into a First Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”), with Flagstar Bank, FSB (“Flagstar Bank”), the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, which amended the Credit Agreement. The First Amendment added Flagstar Bank as a lender under the Credit Agreement, with an initial commitment of $20.0$0.0 million which increased the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $40.0 million to $60.0 million. The First Amendment also increased the maximum amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility to a maximum aggregate amount of $110.0 million, which further increases are available at our option, prior to the termination date, subject to certain terms and conditions. The costs associated with the Amendment of $0.2 million were deferred and are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets.

On December 1, 2016, we entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”), with the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, which amends the Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment, among other things, extends the termination date with respect to commitments under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from December 14, 2018 to December 14, 2019. The Second Amendment became effective upon the payment of an upfront fee of 0.15% of the aggregate amount of any extended commitments on December 15, 2016. Additionally, Citibank, N.A. increased its commitment under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $25.0 million to $35.0 million which increases the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $60.0 million to $70.0 million. The costs associated with the Second Amendment of $0.1 million were deferred and are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets.

On March 6, 2017, Flagstar Bank increased its commitment under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $20.0 million to $35.0 million, which increased the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $70.0 million to $85.0 million.

Additionally, under the terms of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, we are required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various covenants, including financial covenants relating to a maximum Leverage Ratio, a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio, and a minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth, each as defined therein. Our compliance with these financial covenants is measured by calculations and metrics that are specifically defined or described by the terms of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility.

We were in compliance with the covenants under the LOC agreements described above as of December 31, 2016.

Notes Payable
On2019 and December 13, 2013,31, 2018, respectively. Principal on the senior unsecured notes is required to be paid in increments of $12.5 million on August 8, 2024 and $12.5 million on August 8, 2025. The final principal payment of $50.0 million is due on August 8, 2026. Optional prepayment is allowed with payment of a subsidiary“make-whole” premium which fluctuates depending on market interest rates. Interest, which accrues at a fixed rate of JBGL signed a promissory note with Briar Ridge Investments, LTD for $9.0 million maturing on December 13, 2017, bearing interest at 6.0%4.00% per annum, and collateralized by land purchasedis payable quarterly in Allen, Texas. In December 2016,arrears commencing November 8, 2019.

For more detailed information on the Company’s lines of credit, refer to Note 7 to the Consolidated Financial Statements located in Part II, Item 8 of this note was extended through December 31, 2018.Annual Report on Form 10-K.





On August 19, 2016, a subsidiary of JBGL signed a promissory note with Wretched Land, LP for $1.4 million maturing on January 1, 2017, bearing interest at 2.0% per annum and collateralized by land located in Allen, Texas. $0.7 million of this note was repaid during September 2016. In December 2016, this note was extended through March 1, 2017.

On November 30, 2016, a subsidiary of JBGL signed a promissory note for $1.2 million maturing on December 1, 2018, bearing interest at 3.0% per annum and collateralized by land located in Allen, Texas.


Cash Flows
The following summarizes our primary sources and uses of cash in the periods presented:
Cash Flows — Year Ended December 31, 2016 to Year Ended December 31, 2015
The following summarizes our primary sources and uses of cash for the year ended December 31, 20162019 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2015:2018:


Operating activities.
Operating activities. Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $22.1 million, compared to $39.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The net cash outflows for the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily driven by an increase in inventory of $84.0 million, a decrease in customer and builder deposits of $8.0 million, a decrease in accrued expenses of $4.4 million, an increase in other assets of $1.5 million, and a $1.3 million payment of contingent consideration related to the acquisition of GRBK GHO in excess of acquisition date fair value, partially offset by $71.0 million of cash generated from business operations, a $4.0 million increase in accounts payable and a $2.1 million decrease in earnest money deposits.

Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 decreased to $7.9 million compared to $30.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The $23.0 million decrease in cash outflows was primarily attributable to the acquisition of GRBK GHO during the year ended December 31, 2018, partially offset by the $5.3 million investment in EJB River Holdings joint venture during the year ended December 31, 2019.

Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $25.9 million, compared to $71.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2018. The cash inflows for the year ended December 31, 2019 were primarily due to borrowings on lines of credit of $224.0 million and borrowings from senior unsecured notes of $75.0 million, partially offset by $260.0 million of repayments of lines of credit and $11.5 million of distributions to noncontrolling interests partners.

For discussion and analysis of the Company’s cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $7.1 million, compared2018 as well as for comparison to netthe Company’s cash used of $47.7 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. The change was primarily attributable to changes in working capital associated with (i) an increase in accrued expenses of $8.6 millionflows for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared2017, refer to a decreaseItem 7 of $3.5 millionPart II of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, due to an increase in accrued job costs on land and home closings, and management bonuses being paid subsequent to the year ended December 31, 2016, (ii) an increase in earnest money deposits of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, due to an increase in the land option contracts entered into during 2015 compared to 2016, (iii) an increase in customer and builder deposits of $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to a decrease of $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, due to the increase in sales volume during the year ended December 31, 2016 and (iv) a decrease in other assets of $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to an increase of $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2015, due to a decrease in prepaid development costs during the year ended December 31, 2016.
2018. 

Investing activities. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $0.5 million, compared to net cash provided of $2.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. The change was primarily due to a decrease in proceeds from investment in direct financing leases of $2.8 million since there was no investment in direct financing lease activity during the year ended December 31, 2016.

Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $21.5 million, compared to net cash provided of $43.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2015. The change was primarily due to (i) a decrease in cash received of $19.9 million from net proceeds from equity offerings less the repayment of the Term Loan Facility, and (ii) a net decrease in lines of credit and notes payable borrowings of $28.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 compared to a $31.4 million reduction in lines of credit and notes payable borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Cash Flows — Year Ended December 31, 2015 to Year Ended December 31, 2014
The following summarizes our primary sources and uses of cash for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014:

Operating activities. Net cash used in operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $47.6 million, compared to net cash provided of $1.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. The change was primarily attributable to (i) changes in working capital associated with inventory, as inventory increased by 25.1% for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to a 20.3% increase in inventory for the year ended December 31, 2014, (ii) changes in working capital associated with earnest money deposits, as earnest money deposits increased by $11.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to $3.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2014, and (iii) a decrease in accrued expenses of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to an increase of $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2014.

Investing activities. Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $2.5 million, compared to net cash provided of $12.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. The change was primarily due to a decrease in notes receivable payments of $9.2 million and a decrease in proceeds from investment in direct financing leases of $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 partially offset by a decrease in issuance of notes receivable of $1.6 million.



Financing activities. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $43.8 million, compared to net cash used of $9.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2014. The change was primarily due to (i) a net increase in lines of credit and notes payable borrowings of $31.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 compared to a $17.6 million reduction in lines of credit and notes payable borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2014. (ii) an increase in cash received of $19.9 million from net proceeds from equity offerings less the repayment of the Term Loan Facility, and (iii) an increase in net distributions to and contributions from controlling and noncontrolling interests members of $16.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2015 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2014 partially offset by a decrease in cash received as part of reverse recapitalization of $31.9 million.


Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Land and Contractual Obligations

Lot Option Contracts
In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land purchase contracts with third partythird-party developers in order to procure lots for the construction of our homes.homes in the future. We are subject to customary obligations associated with entering into contracts for the purchase of land and improved lots.such contracts. These purchase contracts typically require a cashan earnest money deposit, and the purchase of properties under these contracts is generally contingent upon satisfaction of certain requirements, including obtaining applicable property and development entitlement. entitlements.

We also utilize option contracts with landlot sellers as a method of acquiring landlots in staged takedowns, which are the schedules that dictate when lots must be purchased to help manage the financial and market risk associated with land holdings, and to reduce the use of funds from our corporate financing sources. OptionLot option contracts generally require us to pay a non-refundable deposit for the right to acquire lots over a specified period of time at pre-determined prices. We generally have the right at our discretion to terminate our obligations under both purchase contracts and option contracts by forfeiting the cash deposit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller.prices which typically include escalations in lot prices over time.


Our utilization of landlot option contracts is dependent on, among other things, the availability of land sellers willing to enter into these arrangements, the availability of capital to finance the development of optioned lots, general housing market conditions and local market dynamics. Options may be more difficult to procure from land sellers in strong housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions.


Contractual Obligations Table

The following table summarizesWe generally have the right, at our cashdiscretion, to terminate our obligations asunder both purchase contracts and option contracts by forfeiting the earnest money deposit with no further financial responsibility to the land seller. As of December 31, 2016. We did not have any specific lot and/or land2019, the Company had earnest money deposits of $17.3 million at risk associated with contracts to purchase obligations as2,557 lots past feasibility studies with an aggregate purchase price of approximately $189.8 million.

Deposits and pre-acquisition costs written off related to option contracts abandoned totaled $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.2 million for the years ended December 31, 2016.2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively.


  Payments Due by Period (in thousands)
Contractual Obligations Total Less Than 1 Year 1 - 3 Years 3 - 5 Years Years 5 and Beyond
Debt obligations(1)
 $85,948
 $713
 $85,235
 $
 $
Operating leases 3,625
 770
 1,589
 1,266
 
Total $89,573
 $1,483
 $86,824
 $1,266
 $

Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds
(1)Represents principal due on our LOC and notes payable.

Inflation
Homebuilding operations can be adversely impacted by inflation, primarily from higher land prices, and increased costs of financing, labor, materials and construction. In addition, inflation can leadRefer to higher mortgage rates, which can significantly affect the affordability of mortgage financing to homebuyers. While we attempt to pass on cost increases to customers through increased prices, when weak housing market conditions exist, we may be unable to offset cost increases with higher selling prices.

Seasonality
Historically, the homebuilding industry experiences seasonal fluctuations in quarterly operating results and capital requirements. We typically experience the highest new home order activity in spring and summer, although this activity is also highly dependent on the number of active selling communities, timing of new community openings and other market factors. Since it typically takes five to eight months to construct a new home, we deliver more homesNote 17 in the second halfaccompanying Notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details of the year as springletters of credit and summer home orders leadperformance bonds outstanding.

Guarantee
Refer to home deliveries. Because of this seasonality, home starts, construction costs and related cash outflows have historically been highestNote 3 in the second and third quarters, andaccompanying Notes to the majorityconsolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for details of cash receipts from homeour guarantee in relation to EJB River Holdings joint venture.

deliveries occurs during the second half of the year. We expect this seasonal pattern to continue over the long-term, although it may be affected by volatility in the homebuilding industry.

SignificantCritical Accounting Policies
OurThe preparation of financial statements have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The preparation of these financial statementsUnited States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) requires management to use judgment and make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues, costs and expenses during the reporting period. On an ongoing basis, management evaluates estimates and judgments, including those which impact our most critical accounting policies. Management bases estimates and judgments on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from estimates under different assumptions or conditions. Management believes that the following accounting policies are among thearea is most importantcritical to the portrayal of our financial condition and results of operations and require amongrequires the most difficult, subjective or complex judgments.


PrinciplesImpairment of ConsolidationInventory
As described in Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, BioFuel acquired JBGL on October 27, 2014.
The accounting treatment of the Transaction is reflected as a “reverse recapitalization,” whereby JBGL is the surviving accounting entity for financial reporting purposes. Therefore, our historical results for periods prior to the Transaction are the same as JBGL's historical results.

All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation and combination. Investments in which we directly or indirectly have an interest of more than 50 percent and/or are able to exercise control over the operations have been fully consolidated and noncontrolling interests are stated separately in the consolidated financial statements as required under the provisions of FASB ASC 810, Consolidations.

Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales of residential units, land and lots are not recognized until a sale is deemed to be consummated. Consummation is defined as a) when the parties are bound by the terms of a contract, b) all net consideration has been exchanged, c) any permanent financing for which the seller is responsible has been arranged, d) continuing investment is adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the home and e) all conditions precedent to closing have been performed. Generally, consummation does not happen until a sale has closed. When the earnings process is complete and a sale has closed, income is recognized under the full accrual method which allows full recognition of the gain on the sale at the time of closing.

We also serve as the general contractor for certain custom homes where the customers, and not our company, own the underlying land and improvements. We recognize revenue for these contracts on the percentage of completion method.

Inventories and Cost of Sales
Inventory consists primarily of land in the process of development, developed lots, model homes, completed homes, and raw land scheduled for development, primarily in Texas and Georgia. Inventory is valuedCompany values inventory at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not be recoverable in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes any related pre-acquisition costs that are directly identifiable with a specific property so long as those pre-acquisition costs are recoverable at the sale of the property.

Residential lots held for sale and lots held for development include the initial cost of acquiring the land as well as certain costs capitalized related to developing the land into individual residential lots including interest and real estate taxes.

Land, development and other project costs, including property taxes incurred during development and home construction, are capitalized. Land development and other common costs that benefit an entire community are allocated based on the relative sales value of the lots. The costs of lots are transferred to homes in progress when home construction begins. Home construction costs and related carrying charges are allocated to the cost of individual homes using the specific identification method.

Inventory costs for completed homes are expensed as cost of sales as homes are sold. Changes to estimated total development costs subsequent to initial home closings in a community are generally allocated to the unsold homes in the community on a pro-rata basis. The life cycle of a community generally ranges from two to six years, commencing with the acquisition of land, continuing through the land development phase, and concluding with the construction, sale, and delivery of homes. We recognize costs as incurred on our mechanics lien contracts.



Impairment of Real Estate Inventories
In accordance with the ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment(“ASC 360”), we evaluate our real estate inventory for indicators of impairment by individual community and development during each reporting period.


For our builder operations segment, due largely to the relatively short construction periods of homes (generally ranging from five to nine months) in our communities, our growth over the past four years, and the favorable conditions of the housing market since 2011, we have not experienced any circumstances during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 that are indicators of potential impairment within our builder operations segment. During each reporting period,segments, management reviews community gross margins, are reviewed by management.levels of completed speculative home units, quantities of lots not started, and community outlook factors. In the event that inventory in an individual community is movingthis review suggests higher potential for losses at a slower than anticipated absorption pace orspecific community, the average sales prices or margins within an individual community are trending downward and are anticipatedCompany monitors such communities by adding them to continue to trend downward over the life of the community, we will further investigate theseits “watchlist” communities, and, evaluate them for impairment.when an impairment indicator is present, further analysis is performed.


For our land development segment, we perform a quarterly review for indicators of impairment for each project which involves projecting future lot salesclosings based on executed contracts and comparing these anticipated revenues to projected costs. In determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel, we rely on project budgets thatwhich are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about development schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is common that actual results differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including delays, increaseschanges in costs that have not been committed, unforeseen issues encountered during project development that fall outside the scope of existing contracts, or items that ultimately cost more or less than the budgeted amount. While the actual results for a particular project are accurately reported over time, a variance between the budget and actual costs could occur. To reduce the potential for such variances, weWe apply procedures on a consistent basis,to maintain best estimates in our budgets, including assessing and revising project budgets on a periodic basis, obtaining commitments from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs.


Each reporting period, we review ourFor each real estate assets to determineasset that has an indicator of impairment, we analyze whether the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows of the development are more or less than the asset’s carrying value. The estimated cash flows are determined by projecting the remaining sales revenue from lot salesclosings based on the contractual lot takedowns remaining or historical/historical and projected home sales/sales or delivery absorptions for homebuilding operations and then comparing thatsuch projections to the remaining projected expenditures for development or home construction. Remaining projected expenditures are based on the most current pricing/bids received from subcontractors for current phases or homes under development. For future phases of land development, management uses its best judgment to project potential cost increases. When projecting sales revenue, management does not assume improvement in market conditions.


If the estimated cash flows are more than the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the estimatedundiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and will be written down to fair value.value less associated costs to sell. These impairment evaluations require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including the timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if expected future cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value.


Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development activities, construction and delivery timelines, market risk of price erosion, uncertainty of development or construction cost increases, and other risks


specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities.


When estimating cash flows of a community, we makemanagement makes various assumptions, including: (i) expected sales prices and sales incentives to be offered, including the number of homes available, pricing and incentives being offered by us or other builders, in other communities, and future sales price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred including, but not limited to, land and land development costs, home construction costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, sales price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property.

Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales absorption rates has a direct impact on the estimated per unit sales price of a home, the level of time-sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and carrying costs), and selling and marketing costs (such as model home maintenance costs and advertising costs). Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing and the long life cycle of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

Refer to Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further description of the Company’s significant accounting policies.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for recent accounting pronouncements.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable to smaller reporting companies.






ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm


To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Green Brick Partners, Inc.


Opinion on the Financial Statements
We didhave audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Green Brick Partners, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, and the related notes to the consolidated financial statements (collectively, the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2019, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion
These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.


/s/ RSM US LLP

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2016.

Dallas, Texas
March 6, 2020



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)

As of December 31,

2019
2018
ASSETS
Cash$33,269

$38,315
Restricted cash4,416

3,440
Receivables4,720

4,842
Inventory753,567

668,961
Investments in unconsolidated entities30,294

20,269
Right-of-use assets - operating leases3,462
 
Property and equipment, net4,309

4,690
Earnest money deposits14,686

16,793
Deferred income tax assets, net15,262

16,499
Intangible assets, net707

856
Goodwill680

680
Other assets10,167

8,681
Total assets$875,539

$784,026
LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
Liabilities:   
Accounts payable$30,044

$26,091
Accrued expenses24,656

29,201
Customer and builder deposits23,954

31,978
Lease liabilities - operating leases3,564
 
Borrowings on lines of credit, net164,642

200,386
Senior unsecured notes, net73,406
 
Contingent consideration5,267

2,207
Total liabilities325,533

289,863
Commitments and contingencies 
  
Redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary13,611

8,531
Equity:  



Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity




Preferred stock, $0.01 par value: 5,000,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding
 
Common stock, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; 50,879,949 and 50,719,884 issued and 50,488,010 and 50,583,128 outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively509

507
Treasury stock, at cost, 391,939 and 136,756 shares as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively(3,167)
(981)
Additional paid-in capital290,799
 291,299
Retained earnings235,027

177,526
Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity523,168

468,351
Noncontrolling interests13,227

17,281
Total equity536,395

485,632
Total liabilities and equity$875,539

$784,026

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Residential units revenue$759,830
 $578,893
 $439,520
Land and lots revenue31,830
 44,754
 18,730
Total revenues791,660
 623,647
 458,250
Cost of residential units597,884
 433,279
 325,934
Cost of land and lots24,694
 36,166
 13,856
Total cost of revenues622,578
 469,445
 339,790
Total gross profit169,082
 154,202
 118,460
Selling, general and administrative expense98,659
 80,702
 58,442
Change in fair value of contingent consideration4,906
 1,693
 
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities9,809
 7,259
 2,746
Other income, net9,003
 2,605
 1,473
Income before income taxes84,329
 81,671
 64,237
Income tax expense20,027
 17,136
 39,031
Net income64,302
 64,535
 25,206
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interests5,646
 12,912
 10,236
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc.$58,656
 $51,623
 $14,970
      
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:     
Basic$1.16 $1.02 $0.30
Diluted$1.16 $1.02 $0.30
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:     
Basic50,530
 50,652
 49,597
Diluted50,636
 50,751
 49,683

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
 Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Stockholders’ Equity
 SharesAmount SharesAmount 
Balance at December 31, 201648,955,909
$490
 
$
 $273,149
 $110,933
 $384,572
 $16,913
 $401,485
Share-based compensation

 

 289
 
 289
 
 289
Issuance of common stock under 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan229,049
2
 

 1,924
 
 1,926
 
 1,926
Withholdings from vesting of restricted stock awards(63,057)(1) 

 (585) 
 (586) 
 (586)
Amortization of deferred share-based compensation

 

 356
 
 356
 
 356
Common stock issued in connection with the investment in Challenger1,477,000
15
 

 14,607
 
 14,622
 
 14,622
Common stock issuable in connection with the investment in Challenger

 

 198
 
 198
 
 198
Contributions

 

 
 
 
 438
 438
Distributions

 

 
 
 
 (10,896) (10,896)
Net income

 

 
 14,970
 14,970
 10,236
 25,206
Balance at December 31, 201750,598,901
$506
 
$
 $289,938
 $125,903
 $416,347
 $16,691
 $433,038
Share-based compensation

 

 288
 
 288
 
 288
Issuance of common stock under 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan140,211
1
 

 1,081
 
 1,082
 
 1,082
Withholdings from vesting of restricted stock awards(39,228)
 

 (412) 
 (412) 
 (412)
Amortization of deferred share-based compensation

 

 404
 
 404
 
 404
Common stock issued in connection with the investment in Challenger20,000

 

 
 
 
 
 
Stock repurchases

 (136,756)(981) 
 
 (981) 
 (981)
Contributions

 

 
 
 
 5
 5
Distributions

 

 
 
 
 (10,747) (10,747)
Net income

 

 
 51,623
 51,623
 11,332
 62,955
Balance at December 31, 201850,719,884
$507
 (136,756)$(981) $291,299
 $177,526
 $468,351
 $17,281
 $485,632


GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)
 Common Stock Treasury Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Stockholders’ Equity
 SharesAmount SharesAmount 
Balance at December 31, 201850,719,884
$507
 (136,756)$(981) $291,299
 $177,526
 $468,351
 $17,281
 $485,632
Share-based compensation

 

 236
 
 236
 
 236
Issuance of common stock under 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan219,181
3
 

 1,463
 
 1,466
 
 1,466
Withholdings from vesting of restricted stock awards(59,116)(1) 

 (543) 
 (544) 
 (544)
Amortization of deferred share-based compensation

 

 489
 
 489
 
 489
Stock repurchases

 (255,183)(2,186) 
 
 (2,186) 
 (2,186)
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest

 

 (2,145) 
 (2,145) 
 (2,145)
Increase in ownership in Southgate Homes

 

 
 (891) (891) 891
 
Increase in ownership in Centre Living Homes

 

 
 (264) (264) 264
 
Contributions

 

 
 
 
 3,600
 3,600
Distributions

 

 
 
 
 (10,993) (10,993)
Net income

 

 
 58,656
 58,656
 2,184
 60,840
Balance at December 31, 201950,879,949
$509
 (391,939)$(3,167) $290,799
 $235,027
 $523,168
 $13,227
 $536,395
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$64,302
 $64,535
 $25,206
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:  
   
  
Depreciation and amortization expense3,079
 2,943
 325
Share-based compensation expense2,191
 1,774
 2,571
Change in fair value of contingent consideration4,906
 1,693
 
Deferred income taxes, net1,237
 14,712
 36,299
Equity in income of unconsolidated entities(9,809) (7,259) (2,746)
Distributions of income from unconsolidated entities5,084
 4,623
 974
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:    
  
Decrease (increase) in receivables122
 (3,029) 843
Increase in inventory(83,970) (129,291) (95,452)
Decrease (increase) in earnest money deposits2,107
 2,119
 (3,097)
Increase in other assets(1,525) (2,741) (1,701)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable3,953
 (483) 7,241
(Decrease) increase in accrued expenses(4,384) 9,470
 4,175
Payment of contingent consideration in excess of acquisition date fair value(1,332) 
 
(Decrease) increase in customer and builder deposits(8,024) 1,458
 7,359
Net cash used in operating activities(22,063) (39,476) (18,003)
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Business combination, net of acquired cash
 (26,861) 
Investments in unconsolidated entities(5,300) (755) (286)
Purchase of property and equipment(2,569) (3,211) (149)
Net cash used in investing activities(7,869) (30,827) (435)
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Borrowings from lines of credit224,000
 165,000
 88,500
Borrowings from senior unsecured notes75,000
 
 
Payments of debt issuance costs(1,974) (870) (809)
Repayments of lines of credit(260,000) (70,000) (56,500)
Repayments of notes payable
 (10,226) (1,022)
Payment of contingent consideration(514) 
 
Payments of withholding tax on vesting of restricted stock awards(544) (412) (586)
Stock repurchases(2,186) (981) 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests3,600
 5
 438
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(10,993) (10,747) (10,896)
Distributions to redeemable noncontrolling interest(527) 
 
Net cash provided by financing activities25,862
 71,769
 19,125
Net (decrease) increase in cash and restricted cash(4,070) 1,466
 687
Cash, beginning of period38,315
 36,684
 35,157
Restricted cash, beginning of period3,440
 3,605
 4,445
Cash and restricted cash, beginning of period$41,755
 $40,289
 $39,602
Cash, end of period33,269
 38,315
 36,684
Restricted cash, end of period4,416
 3,440
 3,605
Cash and restricted cash, end of period$37,685
 $41,755
 $40,289


GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest$
 $
 $
Cash paid for income taxes, net of refunds$14,313
 $4,611
 $2,941
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:     
Equity issuance related to investment in unconsolidated entity$
 $
 $14,622
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Principles of Consolidation

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Green Brick Partners, Inc., its controlled subsidiaries, and variable interest entities in which Green Brick Partners, Inc. or one of its controlled subsidiaries is deemed to be the primary beneficiary (together, the “Company”, “we”, or “Green Brick”).

The Company evaluated its wholly-owned subsidiaries and controlled builders under ASC 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”) and concluded that each controlled builder is a variable interest entity (“VIE”). The Company owns a 50% percent equity interest and a 51% voting interest in each controlled builder. In addition, the Company appoints two of the three board managers of each controlled builder and is able to exercise control over the operations of each controlled builder. The Company accounts for its controlled builders under the variable interest model and is the primary beneficiary of each controlled builder in accordance with ASC 810.

All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

The Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in unconsolidated entities over which it exercises significant influence but does not notehave a controlling interest. Under the equity method, the Company’s share of the unconsolidated entities’ earnings or losses is included in the consolidated statements of income.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management of the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, including the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Reclassifications

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Beginning in the first quarter of 2019, the Company reclassified its sales commission expenses from cost of residential units to selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income in order to be more comparable with a majority of its peers. There was no impact on net income from the reclassification in any period.

Cash

The cash balances of the Company are held with multiple financial institutions. At times, cash balances at certain banks and financial institutions may exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes it mitigates this risk by monitoring the financial stability of institutions holding material cash balances. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes that the risk of loss is minimal.

Restricted Cash

Restricted cash primarily relates to cash held in escrow for sales of developed lots to third parties and customer deposits from homebuyers.



Receivables

Receivables consist of amounts collectible from manufacturing rebates earned by our homebuilders during the normal course of business, amounts collectible from third-party escrow agents related to closings on land, lots and homes, amounts collectible related to mechanic’s lien contracts, as well as income tax receivables. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, all amounts are considered fully collectible and 0 allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded. Any allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on our historical losses, the existing economic conditions, and the financial stability of our customers. Receivables are written off in the period that they are deemed uncollectible.

Inventory and Cost of Revenues

Inventory consists of undeveloped land, raw land scheduled for development, land in the process of development, land held for sale, developed lots, homes completed and under construction, and model homes. Inventory is valued at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes any related pre-acquisition costs that are directly identifiable with a specific property so long as those pre-acquisition costs are anticipated to be recoverable at the sale of the property.

Residential lots held for sale and lots held for development include the initial cost of acquiring the land as well as certain costs capitalized related to developing the land into individual residential lots including direct overhead, interest and real estate taxes.

Land development and other project costs, including direct overhead, interest and property taxes incurred during development and home construction, are capitalized. Land development and other common costs that benefit an entire community are allocated to individual lots or homes based on relative sales value. The costs of completed lots are transferred to work in process when home construction begins. Home construction costs and related carrying charges (principally interest and real estate taxes) are allocated to the cost of individual homes.

Inventory costs for completed homes are expensed upon closing and delivery of the homes. Changes to estimated total land development costs subsequent to initial home closings in a community are generally allocated to the unclosed homes and lots in the community on a pro-rata basis. The life cycle of a community generally ranges from 2 to 6 years, commencing with the acquisition of land, continuing through the land development phase, construction, and concluding with the sale and delivery of homes. We recognize costs as incurred on our mechanic’s lien contracts.

Impairment of Inventory

In accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment (“ASC 360”), we evaluate our inventory for indicators of impairment by individual community and development during each reporting period.

For our builder operations segments, during each reporting period, community gross margins, levels of completed speculative home units, quantities of lots not started, and community outlook factors are reviewed by management. In the event that this review suggests higher potential for losses at a specific community, the Company monitors such communities by adding them to its “watchlist” communities, and, when an impairment indicator is present, further analysis is performed.

For our land development segment, we perform a quarterly review for indicators of impairment for any projects,each project which involves projecting future lot closings based on executed contracts and comparing these anticipated revenues to projected costs. In determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel, we rely on project budgets which are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about development schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is common that actual results differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including delays, changes in costs that have not been committed, unforeseen issues encountered during project development that fall outside the scope of existing contracts, or items that ultimately cost more or less than the budgeted amount. We apply procedures to maintain best estimates in our budgets, including assessing and revising project budgets on a periodic basis, obtaining commitments from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs.

Each reporting period, management reviews each real estate asset which has an indicator of impairment in order to determine whether the estimated remaining undiscounted future cash flows are more or less than the asset’s carrying value. The estimated cash flows are determined by projecting the remaining revenue from closings based on the contractual lot takedowns remaining or historical and projected home sales or delivery absorptions for homebuilding operations and then comparing such projections to the remaining projected expenditures for development or home construction. Remaining projected expenditures


are based on the most current pricing/bids received from subcontractors for current phases or homes under development. For future phases of land development, management uses its judgment to project potential cost increases. In determining the estimated cash flows for land held for sale, management considers recent comparisons to market comparable transactions, bona fide letters of intent from outside parties, executed sales contracts, broker quotes, and similar information. When projecting revenue, management does not assume improvement in market conditions.

If the estimated undiscounted cash flows are more than the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustments relatedadjustment is required. However, if the estimated undiscounted cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and will be written down to fair value less associated costs to sell. These impairment evaluations require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including the timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate inventories were recorded,assets, to determine if expected future cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value.

Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development activities, construction and delivery timelines, market risk of price erosion, uncertainty of development or construction cost increases, and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when the assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities.

When estimating cash flows of a community, management makes various assumptions, including: (i) expected sales prices and sales incentives to be offered, including the number of homes available, pricing and incentives being offered by us or other builders, and future sales price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred including, but not limited to, land and land development costs, home construction costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, sales price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015property.

Many assumptions are interdependent and 2014.a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales absorption rates has a direct impact on the estimated per unit sales price of a home, the level of time-sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and carrying costs), and selling and marketing costs (such as model home maintenance costs and advertising costs). Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the volatility in demand for new housing and the long life cycle of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.


Earnest Money DepositsCapitalization of Interest
We account
The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred to inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Interest capitalized as cost of inventory is charged to cost of revenues as related homes, land and lots are closed. Interest incurred on undeveloped land is directly expensed and included in interest expense in our consolidated statements of income.

Investments in Unconsolidated Entities

In accordance with ASC 323, Investments - Equity Method and Joint Ventures (“ASC 323”), the Company uses the equity method of accounting for its investments in unconsolidated entities over which it exercises significant influence but does not have a controlling interest. The equity method of accounting requires the investment to be initially recorded at cost and subsequently adjusted for the Companys share of equity in the unconsolidated entity’s earnings or losses. The Company evaluates the carrying amount of the investments in unconsolidated entities for impairment in accordance with ASC 323. If the Company determines that a loss in the value of the investment is other than temporary, the Company writes down the investment to its estimated fair value. Any such losses are recorded to equity in income of unconsolidated entities in the Companys consolidated statements of income. Due to uncertainties in the estimation process and the volatility in demand for new housing, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

The Company has made an election to classify distributions received from unconsolidated entities using the nature of the distribution approach. Distributions received are classified as cash inflows from operating activities based on the nature of the activities of the investee that generated the distribution.



Variable Interest Entities

The Company accounts for variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). Under810. In accordance with ASC 810, an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”)VIE when: (a) the equity investment at risk in the entity is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by other parties, including the equity holders; (b) the entity’s equity holders as a group either (i) lack the direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (ii) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (iii) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the entity’s equity holders have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests, and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of the equity holder with disproportionately few voting rights.

If an entity is deemed to be a VIE pursuant to ASC 810, anthe enterprise that has both (i) the power to direct the activities of athe VIE that most significantly impactimpacts the entity’s economic performance and (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or right to receive benefits from the entity that could be potentially significant to the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. In accordance with ASC 810, we perform ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a VIE.

In the ordinary course of business, we enter into land option agreements in order to procure land for the construction of homes in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements, we generally provide a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such contracts enable us to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties or unconsolidated entities until we have determined whether and when to exercise its option, which reduces our financial risks associated with long-term land holdings. Option deposits and pre-acquisition costs (such as environmental testing, surveys, engineering, and entitlement costs) are capitalized if the costs are directly identifiable with the land under option and acquisition of the property is probable. Such costs are reflected in other assets and are reclassified to inventory upon taking title to the land. We write off deposits and pre-acquisition costs when it becomes probable that we will not go forward with the project or recover the capitalized costs. Such decisions take into consideration changes in local market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the availability and best use of necessary incremental capital, and other factors.

Under ASC 810, a non-refundable deposit paid to an entity is deemed to be a variable interest that will absorb some or all of the entity’s expected losses if they occur and, as such, our land option agreements are considered variable interests. Our land option agreement deposits, along with any related pre-acquisition costs, generally represent our maximum exposure to the land seller if we elect not to purchase the optioned property. Therefore, whenever we enter into a land option or purchase contract with an entity and make a non-refundable deposit, a VIE may have been created. However, we generally have little control or influence over the operations of these VIEs due to our lack of an equity interest in them. Additionally, creditors of the VIE typically have no recourse against us, and we do not provide financial or other support to these VIEs other than as stipulated in the land option agreements. In accordance with ASC 810, we perform ongoing reassessments of whether we are the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As a result of the foregoing, we were not required to consolidate any VIE as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

Share-Based Compensation
We measure and account for share-based awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, “Compensation - Stock Compensation”. We expense share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options and restricted stock awards. Share-based compensation expense associated with stock options and restricted stock awards with vesting contingent upon the achievement of service conditions is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period the awards are expected to vest. We estimate the value of stock options with vesting contingent upon the achievement of service conditions as of the date the award was granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricing model requires the use of certain input variables, such as expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected award life.

Income Taxes
The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in


which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The Company regularly reviews historical and anticipated future pre-tax results of operations to determine whether the Company will be able to realize the benefit of its deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required to reduce the potential deferred tax asset when it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of the potential deferred tax asset will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. The Company establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions that reflect its best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more-likely-than-not basis. The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in income tax provision on the consolidated statements of income. Accrued interest and penalties are included in the related tax liability account within accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

Fair Value Measurements
We have adopted and implemented the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements, with respect to fair value measurements of (a) all elected financial assets and liabilities and (b) any nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). Under FASB ASC 820-10, fair value is defined as an exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. These provisions establish a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of input are defined as follows:
Level 1 —unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by us;
Level 2 —inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those classified as Level 1; and
Level 3 —inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation.

Entities are encouraged to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation.

Our valuation methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for recent accounting pronouncements.

Related Party Transactions
See Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a description of our transactions with related parties.


ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Our operations are interest rate sensitive. Because overall housing demand is adversely affected by increases in interest rates, a significant increase in mortgage interest rates may negatively affect the ability of homebuyers to secure adequate financing. Higher interest rates could adversely affect our revenues, gross margins and net income.

Our lines of credit have variable interest rates. An increase in interest rates could cause the cost of those lines to increase. As of December 31, 2016, we had $75.0 million outstanding on these lines of credit. However, the lines of credit are subject to minimum interest rates which we are currently being charged.



The following table presents our debt obligations, principal cash flows by maturity, weighted average interest rates and estimated fair market value for the year ended December 31, 2016 (amounts in thousands):
            Fair Value at December 31, 2016
  2017 2018 2019 2020 and thereafter Total 
Lines of Credit            
Variable debt $
 $
 $75,000
 $
 $75,000
 $75,000
Weighted average interest rate % % 3.4% % % n/a
             
Notes payable            
Fixed debt $713
 $10,235
 $
 $
 $10,948
 $10,948
Weighted average interest rate 2.0% 5.6% % % % n/a

Based upon the amount of lines of credit as of December 31, 2016, and holding the notes payables balance constant, a 1% increase in interest rates would increase the interest incurred by us by approximately $0.5 million per year, which may be capitalized pursuant to our interest capitalization policy.

We do not enter into, or intend to enter into, swaps, forward or option contracts on interest rates or commodities or other types of derivative financial instruments for trading, hedging or speculative purposes.

Many of the statements contained in this section are forward looking and should be read in conjunction with the disclosures under the heading “Forward Looking Statements.”

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

We incorporate the information required for this item by reference to the financial statements listed in Item 15(a) of Part IV of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the Securities and Exchange Commission and, as such, is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, together with our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2016. Based on our evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2016.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”). Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.



Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016 based upon Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, there were no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our internal control over financial reporting, except that we completed execution of our remediation plans and successfully remediated several material weaknesses in internal controls related to the following:

Management moved to an ERP self-host structure that involves hosting and managing the Company’s ERP software system and underlying infrastructure internally rather than obtaining that service from a third-party service organization. This allows management greater flexibility and control to design, implement, and test the information technology general controls over security access and change management.

Management designed and implemented processes and controls over the review and approval of manual journal entries to ensure that all manual journal entries are reviewed and approved and appropriately supported. Further, management reorganized the roles and responsibilities in the accounting and financial reporting processes which has improved controls over the journal entry review process.

Management designed and implemented processes and controls over the identification, evaluation, approval, and disclosure of related party transactions.

Management designed and implemented processes and controls over the review of period-end accruals and cut-off procedures and recording of inventory costs, cost of goods sold, and operating expenses. Further, management reorganized the roles and responsibilities in the accounting and financial reporting processes which has improved the processes and controls related to cut-off procedures.

Management designed and implemented processes and controls over the classification of transactions within the Company’s general ledger accounts and corresponding classification within the financial statements.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM


To the Board of Directors and Stockholders
Green Brick Partners, Inc.


We have audited Green Brick Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries’ (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company's internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally


accepted accounting principles. A company's internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (a) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (b) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (c) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion.

/s/ RSM US LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 13, 2017


ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.



PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information regarding our executive officers is reported in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All other information required by this Item 10 will be set forth in our Proxy Statement or in a future amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this Item 11 will be set forth in our Proxy Statement or in a future amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this Item 12 will be set forth in our Proxy Statement or in a future amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by this Item 13 will be set forth in our Proxy Statement or in a future amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by this Item 14 will be set forth in our Proxy Statement or in a future amendment to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.



PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1) Financial Statements



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
INDEX TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS




REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Green Brick Partners, Inc.


We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Green Brick Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2016, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for year ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2016, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013, and our report dated March 13, 2017 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ RSM US LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 13, 2017



REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

Board of Directors and Stockholders
Green Brick Partners, Inc.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Green Brick Partners, Inc. (formerly named BioFuel Energy Corp.) (a Delaware corporation) and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2015, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Green Brick Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2015, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 30, 2016 (except for the effects of the change in classification described in Note 2 - Change in Classification and the changes in presentation of segment information described in Note 2 - Segment Information and in Note 13, as to which the date is March 13, 2017)



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In thousands, except share data)

 As of December 31,
 2016 2015
Assets
Cash and cash equivalents$35,157
 $21,207
Restricted cash4,445
 2,568
Accounts receivable2,448
 3,314
Inventory410,297
 344,132
Property and equipment, net892
 802
Earnest money deposits18,143
 17,845
Deferred income tax assets, net67,598
 80,663
Other assets, net2,004
 3,345
Total assets$540,984
 $473,876
Liabilities and stockholders equity
Accounts payable$15,113
 $13,530
Accrued expenses14,290
 5,719
Customer and builder deposits14,088
 6,938
Obligations related to land not owned under option agreements10,060
 18,176
Borrowings on lines of credit75,000
 47,500
Notes payable10,948
 10,158
Total liabilities139,499
 102,021
Commitments and contingencies (Note 12)
 
Stockholders’ equity   
Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity   
Common shares, $0.01 par value: 100,000,000 shares authorized; 48,955,909 and 48,833,323 issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively490
 488
Additional paid-in capital273,149
 271,867
Retained earnings110,933
 87,177
Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. stockholders’ equity384,572
 359,532
Noncontrolling interests16,913
 12,323
Total stockholders’ equity401,485
 371,855
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity$540,984
 $473,876

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In thousands, except per share data)

 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Sale of residential units$365,164
 $254,267
 $200,650
Sale of land and lots15,164
 36,878
 45,452
Total revenues380,328
 291,145
 246,102
Cost of residential units283,454
 201,768
 153,799
Cost of land and lots10,499
 27,125
 34,082
Total cost of sales293,953
 228,893
 187,881
Total gross profit86,375
 62,252
 58,221
Salary expense(21,871) (16,272) (11,428)
Management fees expense – related party
 
 (1,266)
Selling, general and administrative expense(16,758) (13,704) (9,840)
Operating profit47,746
 32,276
 35,687
Interest expense
 (281) (1,393)
Other income, net2,808
 2,721
 1,915
Income before taxes50,554
 34,716
 36,209
Income tax provision (benefit)15,381
 9,171
 (24,853)
Net income35,173
 25,545
 61,062
Less: net income attributable to noncontrolling interests11,417
 10,220
 11,036
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc.$23,756
 $15,325
 $50,026
      
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:     
Basic$0.49 $0.38 $3.40
Diluted$0.49 $0.38 $3.40
Weighted average common shares used in the calculation of net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:     
Basic48,879
 40,068
 14,712
Diluted48,886
 40,099
 14,712

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In thousands, except share data)

 Common Stock Additional Paid-in Capital Retained Earnings Total Green Brick Partners, Inc. Stockholders’ Equity Noncontrolling Interests Total Stockholders’ Equity
 Shares Amount 
Balance as of December 31, 201311,108,500
 $111
 $155,985
 $33,014
 $189,110
 $9,709
 $198,819
Share-based compensation
 
 40
 
 40
 
 40
Common stock issued in private and public offering14,000,000
 140
 69,860
 
 70,000
 
 70,000
Issuance of common stock for reverse recapitalization6,237,584
 62
 (124,259) 
 (124,197) 
 (124,197)
Contributions
 
 
 
 
 787
 787
Distributions
 
 
 (13,121) (13,121) (11,793) (24,914)
Net income
 
 
 50,026
 50,026
 11,036
 61,062
Balance as of December 31, 201431,346,084
 $313
 $101,626
 $69,919
 $171,858
 $9,739
 $181,597
Share-based compensation
 
 383
 
 383
 
 383
Issuance of common stock under 2014 Equity Plan42,342
 
 
 
 
 
 
Amortization of deferred share-based compensation
 
 91
 
 91
 
 91
Issuance of common stock in connection with secondary offering, net of issuance costs17,444,897
 175
 169,767
 
 169,942
 
 169,942
Contributions
 
 
 
 
 87
 87
Distributions
 
 
 
 
 (7,723) (7,723)
Out-of-period adjustment
 
 
 1,933
 1,933
 
 1,933
Net income
 
 
 15,325
 15,325
 10,220
 25,545
Balance as of December 31, 201548,833,323
 $488
 $271,867
 $87,177
 $359,532
 $12,323
 $371,855
Share-based compensation
 
 361
 
 361
 
 361
Issuance of common stock under 2014 Equity Plan122,586
 2
 647
 
 649
 
 649
Amortization of deferred share-based compensation
 
 274
 
 274
 
 274
Contributions
 
 
 
 
 2,928
 2,928
Distributions
 
 
 
 
 (9,755) (9,755)
Net income
 
 
 23,756
 23,756
 11,417
 35,173
Balance as of December 31, 201648,955,909
 $490
 $273,149
 $110,933
 $384,572
 $16,913
 $401,485

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.



GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In thousands)
 For the Year Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Cash flows from operating activities:     
Net income$35,173
 $25,545
 $61,062
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities:  
   
   
Depreciation and amortization expense286
 865
 291
Share-based compensation1,284
 474
 40
Deferred income taxes, net13,147
 8,352
 (25,338)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities  
   
   
Increase in restricted cash(1,877) (2,242) (327)
Decrease (increase) in accounts receivable866
 (2,566) (303)
Increase in inventory(74,281) (58,728) (38,026)
Increase in earnest money deposits(298) (11,169) (3,384)
Decrease (increase) in other assets1,341
 (1,887) (828)
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable1,583
 (21) 4,898
Increase (decrease) in accrued expenses8,571
 (3,465) 4,706
Increase (decrease) in customer and builder deposits7,150
 (2,814) (1,022)
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities(7,055) (47,656) 1,769
Cash flows from investing activities:     
Proceeds from sale of investment in direct financing leases
 2,768
 5,581
Issuance of notes receivable
 
 (1,600)
Repayments of notes receivable
 
 9,156
Acquisition of property and equipment(458) (307) (520)
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities(458) 2,461
 12,617
Cash flows from financing activities:     
Cash received as part of reverse recapitalization
 
 31,916
Borrowings from lines of credit63,000
 86,000
 19,000
Proceeds from notes payable2,660
 3,206
 7,989
Repayments of lines of credit(35,500) (52,561) (22,147)
Repayments of notes payable(1,870) (5,199) (22,434)
Repayment of term loan facility
 (150,000) 
Proceeds from equity offering, net of issuance costs
 169,942
 
Contributions from noncontrolling interests2,928
 87
 787
Distributions to controlling interests
 
 (13,121)
Distributions to noncontrolling interests(9,755) (7,723) (11,793)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities21,463
 43,752
 (9,803)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents13,950
 (1,443) 4,583
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year21,207
 22,650
 18,067
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year$35,157
 $21,207
 $22,650
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:     
Cash paid for interest, net of capitalized interest$
 $2,764
 $1,433
Cash paid for taxes$1,503
 $1,339
 $636
Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing and financing activities:     
Decrease (increase) in land not owned under option agreements$6,921
 $(8,935) $(7,279)
Accrued debt issuance costs$
 $52
 $235
Out-of-period equity adjustment$
 $1,933
 $


 The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.


GREEN BRICK PARTNERS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION

When used in these notes, references to the “Company”, “Green Brick”, “we”, “us” or “our” refer to the combined company, which has been renamed Green Brick Partners, Inc. and its subsidiaries, resulting from the acquisition by BioFuel Energy Corp. and its then consolidated subsidiaries (“BioFuel”) of JBGL Builder Finance LLC and its consolidated subsidiaries and affiliated companies (collectively, “Builder Finance”), and JBGL Capital Companies (“Capital”), a combined group of commonly managed limited liability companies and partnerships (collectively with Builder Finance, “JBGL”) by means of a reverse recapitalization transaction on October 27, 2014.

Green Brick Partners, Inc. (formerly named BioFuel Energy Corp.) was incorporated as a Delaware corporation on April 11, 2006, to invest solely in BioFuel Energy, LLC, a limited liability company organized on January 25, 2006, to build and operate ethanol production facilities in the Midwestern United States. On November 22, 2013, the Company disposed of its ethanol plants and all related assets. Following the disposition of these production facilities, we were a public shell company with no substantial operations.

On June 10, 2014, the Company entered into a definitive transaction agreement with the owners of JBGL, which provided that we would acquire JBGL for $275.0 million, payable in cash and shares of our common stock (the “Transaction”). JBGL is a real estate operator involved in the purchase and development of land for residential use, construction lending and home building operations. The Transaction was completed on October 27, 2014 (the “Transaction Date”). Pursuant to the terms of the Transaction, we paid the $275.0 million purchase price with approximately $191.8 million in cash and the remainder in 11,108,500 shares of our common stock valued at approximately $7.49 per share.

The cash portion of the purchase price was primarily funded from the proceeds of a $70.0 million rights offering conducted by the Company (the $70.0 million includes proceeds from purchases of shares of common stock by certain funds and accounts managed by Greenlight Capital, Inc. and its affiliates (“Greenlight”) and Third Point LLC and its affiliates (“Third Point”)) and $150.0 million of debt financing provided by Greenlight pursuant to a loan agreement, with the lenders from time to time party thereto (the “Loan Agreement”), which provided for a five year term loan facility (the “Term Loan Facility”). In 2015, the Loan Agreement was repaid in full.

The $70.0 million rights offering included a registered offering by the Company of transferable rights to the public holders of its common stock, as of September 15, 2014 (the “Rights Offering”) to purchase additional shares of common stock. Each right permitted the holder to purchase, at a rights price ultimately equal to $5.00 per share of common stock, 2.2445 shares of common stock. 4,843,384 shares of common stock were purchased in the public Rights Offering for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $24.2 million.

In addition to the Rights Offering, Greenlight and Third Point participated in a private rights offering to purchase additional shares of common stock pursuant to commitment letters. Pursuant to its commitment letter, Third Point agreed to participate in the private rights offering for its full basic subscription privilege in the Rights Offering and to purchase, simultaneously with the consummation of the Rights Offering to the public, all of the available shares not otherwise sold in the Rights Offering following the exercise of all other public holders’ basic subscription privileges. Pursuant to such commitment letters, Greenlight purchased 4,957,618 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $24.8 million and Third Point purchased 4,198,998 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $21.0 million.

At the time the Transaction was completed, BioFuel was a non-operating public shell corporation with nominal operations and assets consisting of cash, deferred tax assets, and nominal other nonoperating assets. As a result of the Transaction, the owners and management of JBGL gained effective operating control of the combined company. As of the Transaction Date, BioFuel did not meet the definition of a business for accounting purposes.

Accordingly, for financial reporting purposes, the Transaction was deemed to be a capital transaction in substance and recorded as a reverse recapitalization of JBGL whereby JBGL is deemed to be the continuing, surviving entity for accounting purposes, but through reorganization, has deemed to have adopted the capital structure of BioFuel. Because the acquisition was considered a reverse recapitalization for accounting purposes, the combined historical financial statements of JBGL became our historical financial statements and from the completion of the acquisition on October 27, 2014, the financial statements have been prepared on a consolidated basis. The assets and liabilities of BioFuel have been brought forward at their book value and no goodwill has been recognized in connection with the Transaction.



As a result of the Transaction, Green Brick changed its business direction and is now in the real estate industry. We are a uniquely structured company that combines residential land development and homebuilding. We acquire and develop land, provide land and construction financing to our controlled builders and participate in the profits of our controlled builders. Our core markets are in the high growth U.S. metropolitan areas of Dallas, Texas and Atlanta, Georgia. We are engaged in all aspects of the homebuilding process, including land acquisition and development, entitlements, design, construction, marketing and sales and the creation of brand images at our residential neighborhoods and master planned communities.

The consolidated financial statements set forth in this Annual Report on Form 10-K consist of JBGL and BioFuel Energy, LLC. The consolidated financial statements for all periods prior to the reverse recapitalization are the historical financial statements of JBGL, and have been retroactively restated to give effect to the Transaction.

Equity Offering
On July 1, 2015, the Company completed an underwritten public offering of 17,000,000 shares of its common stock at a price to the public of $10.00 per share and granted to the underwriters a 30-day option to purchase up to an aggregate of 841,500 additional shares of common stock to cover over-allotments (the “Equity Offering”). On July 23, 2015, the underwriters exercised the option and purchased 444,897 additional shares. All of the shares were sold by the Company pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement previously filed with the SEC.

The Equity Offering resulted in net proceeds to Green Brick of approximately $170.0 million, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. On July 1, 2015, Green Brick used approximately $154.9 million of the net proceeds from the Equity Offering to repay all of the outstanding principal, interest and a prepayment premium under the Term Loan Facility. Upon repayment, the Term Loan Facility was terminated and all security interests in, and all liens held by Greenlight with respect to, the assets of Green Brick securing the amounts owed under the Term Loan Facility were terminated and released. Green Brick used the remaining net proceeds for working capital and general corporate purposes.
Basis of Presentation
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) as set forth in the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) and applicable regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”).

Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the historic accounts of JBGL and are consolidated with Green Brick beginning October 27, 2014. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Investments in which the Company directly or indirectly has an interest of more than 50 percent and/or is able to exercise control over the operations have been fully consolidated and noncontrolling interests are stated separately in the consolidated financial statements as required under the provisions of FASB ASC 810, Consolidations. The Company has created subsidiaries for each significant community and or project in which it invests. We had seventy-eight subsidiaries as of December 31, 2016.

2. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires the Company to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes, including the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents
The Company considers all cash and short term liquid investments with original maturities of 90 days or less to be cash and cash equivalents. The cash balances of the Company are held in multiple financial institutions. At times, cash and cash equivalent balances at certain banks and financial institutions may exceed insurable amounts. The Company believes it mitigates this risk by monitoring the financial stability of institutions holding material cash balances. The Company has not experienced any losses in such accounts and believes that the risk of loss is minimal.



Restricted Cash
Restricted cash primarily relates to cash held in escrow to fund future development costs and refundable customer deposits held in escrow.

Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable represent amounts due from customers and third parties originating during the normal course of business. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, all amounts are considered fully collectible and no allowance for doubtful accounts is recorded. The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated based on our historical losses, the existing economic conditions, and the financial stability of our customers. Receivables are written-off in the period that they are deemed uncollectible.

Inventory and Cost of Sales
Inventory consists of land in the process of development, undeveloped land, developed lots, completed homes, raw land scheduled for development, and land not owned under option agreements in Texas and Georgia. Inventory is valued at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected inventory is written down to fair value. Cost includes any related pre-acquisition costs that are directly identifiable with a specific property so long as those pre-acquisition costs are recoverable at the sale of the property.

Residential lots held for sale and lots held for development include the initial cost of acquiring the land as well as certain costs capitalized related to developing the land into individual residential lots including direct overhead, interest and real estate taxes.

Land, development and other project costs, including direct overhead, interest and property taxes incurred during development and home construction, are capitalized. Land development and other common costs that benefit an entire community are allocated to individual lots or homes based on relative sales value. The costs of lots are transferred to work in progress when home construction begins. Home construction costs and related carrying charges (principally interest and property taxes) are allocated to the cost of individual homes using the specific identification method.

Inventory costs for completed homes are expensed as cost of sales as homes are sold. Changes to estimated total development costs subsequent to initial home closings in a community are generally allocated to the unsold homes in the community on a pro-rata basis. The life cycle of a community generally ranges from two to six years, commencing with the acquisition of land, continuing through the land development phase, construction, and concluding with the sale and delivery of homes.
 As of December 31,
 2016 2015
Completed home inventory and residential lots held for sale$127,679
 $85,342
Work in process269,255
 236,383
Undeveloped land4,070
 6,193
Land not owned under option agreements9,293
 16,214
Total Inventory$410,297
 $344,132

Impairment of Real Estate Inventory
In accordance with the ASC Topic 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment, we evaluate our real estate inventory for indicators of impairment by individual community and development during each reporting period.

For our builder operations segment, due largely to the relatively short construction periods of homes (generally ranging from five to nine months) in the communities, our growth over the past four years, and the favorable conditions of the housing market since 2011, we have not experienced any circumstances during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 that are indicators of potential impairment within our builder operations segment. During each reporting period, community gross margins are reviewed by management. In the event that inventory in an individual community is moving at a slower than anticipated absorption pace or the average sales prices or margins within an individual community are trending downward and are anticipated to continue to trend downward over the life of the community, the Company will further investigate these communities and evaluate them for impairment.



For our land development segment, we perform a quarterly review for indicators of impairment for each project which involves projecting future lot sales based on executed contracts and comparing these revenues to projected costs. In determining the allocation of costs to a particular land parcel, we rely on project budgets that are based on a variety of assumptions, including assumptions about schedules and future costs to be incurred. It is common that actual results differ from budgeted amounts for various reasons, including delays, increases in costs that have not been committed, unforeseen issues encountered during project development that fall outside the scope of existing contracts, or items that ultimately cost more or less than the budgeted amount. While the actual results for a particular project are accurately reported over time, a variance between the budget and actual costs could occur. To reduce the potential for such variances, we apply procedures on a consistent basis, including assessing and revising project budgets on a periodic basis, obtaining commitments from subcontractors and vendors for future costs to be incurred and utilizing the most recent information available to estimate costs.

Each reporting period, the Company reviews our real estate assets to determine whether the estimated remaining future cash flows of the development are more or less than the asset’s carrying value. The estimated cash flows are determined by projecting the remaining sales revenue from lot sales based on the contractual lot takedowns remaining or historical/projected home sales/delivery absorptions for homebuilding operations and then comparing that to the remaining projected expenditures for development or home construction. Remaining projected expenditures are based on the most current pricing/bids received from subcontractors for current phases or homes under development. For future phases of land development, management uses its best judgment to project potential cost increases. When projecting sales revenue, management does not assume improvement in market conditions.

If the estimated cash flows are more than the asset’s carrying value, no impairment adjustment is required. However, if the estimated cash flows are less than the asset’s carrying value, the asset is deemed impaired and will be written down to fair value. These impairment evaluations require us to make estimates and assumptions regarding future conditions, including the timing and amounts of development costs and sales prices of real estate assets, to determine if expected future cash flows will be sufficient to recover the asset’s carrying value.

Fair value is determined based on estimated future cash flows discounted for inherent risks associated with real estate assets. These discounted cash flows are impacted by expected risk based on estimated land development activities, construction and delivery timelines, market risk of price erosion, uncertainty of development or construction cost increases, and other risks specific to the asset or market conditions where the asset is located when assessment is made. These factors are specific to each community and may vary among communities.

When estimating cash flows of a community, the Company makes various assumptions, including: (i) expected sales prices and sales incentives to be offered, including the number of homes available, pricing and incentives being offered by us or other builders in other communities, and future sales price adjustments based on market and economic trends; (ii) expected sales pace and cancellation rates based on local housing market conditions, competition and historical trends; (iii) costs expended to date and expected to be incurred including, but not limited to, land and land development costs, home construction costs, interest costs, indirect construction and overhead costs, and selling and marketing costs; (iv) alternative product offerings that may be offered that could have an impact on sales pace, sales price and/or building costs; and (v) alternative uses for the property. Many assumptions are interdependent and a change in one may require a corresponding change to other assumptions. For example, increasing or decreasing sales absorption rates has a direct impact on the estimated per unit sales price of a home, the level of time-sensitive costs (such as indirect construction, overhead and carrying costs), and selling and marketing costs (such as model maintenance costs and advertising costs). Due to uncertainties in the estimation process, the significant volatility in demand for new housing and the long life cycle of many communities, actual results could differ significantly from such estimates.

For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, the Company has not identified any indicators of impairment or changes in circumstances that may indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may be impaired.

Capitalization of Interest
The Company capitalizes interest costs incurred to inventory during active development and other qualifying activities. Interest capitalized as cost of inventory is charged to cost of sales as related homes, land and/or lots are closed. Interest incurred on undeveloped land is directly expensed and included in interest expense in our consolidated statements of income.



Interest costs incurred, capitalized and expensed were as follows (in thousands):
 2016 2015 2014
Interest capitalized at beginning of year$9,085
 $3,713
 $1,065
Interest incurred3,218
 9,625
 4,146
Interest charged to cost of sales(2,886) (3,972) (105)
Interest charged to interest expense
 (281) (1,393)
Interest capitalized at end of year$9,417
 $9,085
 $3,713

Earnest Money Deposits
The Company accounts for variable interest entities in accordance with ASC Topic 810, Consolidation (“ASC 810”). Under ASC 810, an entity is a variable interest entity (“VIE”) when: (a) the equity investment at risk in the entity is not sufficient to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support provided by other parties, including the equity holders; (b) the entity’s equity holders as a group either (i) lack the direct or indirect ability to make decisions about the entity, (ii) are not obligated to absorb expected losses of the entity or (iii) do not have the right to receive expected residual returns of the entity; or (c) the entity’s equity holders have voting rights that are not proportionate to their economic interests, and the activities of the entity involve or are conducted on behalf of the equity holder with disproportionately few voting rights.

If an entity is deemed to be a VIE pursuant to ASC 810, an enterprise that has both: (i) the power to direct the activities of a VIE that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance; and (ii) the obligation to absorb the expected losses of the entity or right to receive benefits from the entity that could be potentially significant to the VIE is considered the primary beneficiary and must consolidate the VIE. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company performs ongoing reassessments of whether an enterpriseit is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. The financial statements of the VIEs for which the Company is considered to be the primary beneficiary, if any, are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interests attributable to other beneficiaries of the VIEs are included as noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.


Property and Equipment, Net

Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight-line method. The estimated useful lives of assets range from 1 to 15 years. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

In accordance with ASC 360, our property and equipment and right-of-use assets related to operating leases are reviewed for possible impairment if there are indicators that their carrying amounts are not recoverable. The carrying amount of a long-lived asset is considered not recoverable if it exceeds the sum of the undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual disposition of the asset. An impairment loss shall be measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of a long-lived asset exceeds its fair value.

Earnest Money Deposits

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into land and lot option agreementscontracts in order to procure land for the construction of homes in the future. Pursuant to these land option agreements,contracts, the Company generally provides a deposit to the seller as consideration for the right to purchase land at different times in the future, usually at predetermined prices. Such contracts enable the Company to defer acquiring portions of properties owned by third parties or unconsolidated entities until the Company has determined whether and when to exercise its option, which reduces the Company’s financial risksrisk associated with long-term land holdings. Option deposits and pre-acquisition costs (such as environmental testing, surveys, engineering, and entitlement costs) are capitalized if the costs are directly identifiable with the land under option and acquisition of the property is probable. Such costs are reflected in earnest money deposits and are reclassified to inventory upon taking title to the land. The Company writes off deposits and pre-acquisition costs whenif it becomes probable that the Company will not go forwardproceed with the project or recover the capitalized costs. Such decisions take into consideration changes in local market conditions, the timing of required land takedowns, the availability and best use of necessary incremental capital, and other factors. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had land option agreements with potential purchase payments through 2019.


Under ASC 810, a non-refundable deposit paid to an entity is deemed to be a variable interest that will absorb some or all of the entity’s expected losses if they occur and, as such, the Company’s land and lot option agreementscontracts are considered variable interests. The Company’s land options agreementoption contract deposits along with any related pre-acquisition costs represent the Company’s maximum exposure to the land seller if the Company elects not to purchase the optioned property. Therefore, whenever the Company enters into a landan option or purchase contract with an entity and makes a non-refundable deposit, a VIE assessment is reviewed.performed. However, the Company generally has little control or power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE'sVIE’s economic performance due to the Company’s lack of an equity interest in them. Additionally, creditors of the VIE typically have no material recourse against the Company, and the Company does not provide financial or other support to these VIEs other than as stipulated in the land option agreements.contracts. In accordance with ASC 810, the Company performs ongoing reassessments of whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of a VIE. As a result



Intangible Assets

Intangible assets, net consists of the foregoing,estimated fair value of the Company wasacquired trade name, net of amortization. The trade name has a definite life and is amortized over ten years.

Intangible assets are tested for impairment whenever events or circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not requiredbe recoverable. An impairment loss would be recognized if the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated undiscounted future cash flows expected to consolidate any VIE as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Sales with Option to Repurchase
The Company sold land and then entered into land option contracts to repurchase the landresult from the buyers. Our utilizationuse of land option contractsthe asset and its eventual disposition. The impairment loss recorded would be the excess of the asset’s carrying value over its fair value. Fair value would be determined using a discounted cash flow analysis or other valuation technique.

Goodwill

The excess of the purchase price of a business acquisition over the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is dependent on, among other things, the availability of land sellers willing to enter into these arrangements, the availability of capital to finance the development of optioned lots, general housing market conditions, and local market dynamics. Options may be more difficult to procure from land sellers in strong housing markets and are more prevalent in certain geographic regions. For accounting purposescapitalized as goodwill in accordance with ASC 360-20-40-38, Property, Plant,805, Business Combinations (“ASC 805”). Goodwill is assessed for impairment at least annually in the fourth quarter, or more frequently if certain impairment indicators are present. Goodwill impairment exists when a reporting unit’s goodwill carrying value exceeds its implied fair value.

Per ASC 350, Intangibles - Goodwill and EquipmentOther (“ASC 350”), these transactions are consideredan entity may make a financing ratherqualitative assessment of whether it is more likely than not that a sale. Asreporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying a result,two-step goodwill impairment test. When performing a qualitative assessment, an entity evaluates relevant events and circumstances, including but not limited to, macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, overall financial performance, reporting unit specific events and entity specific events. If, after completing a qualitative assessment, an entity concludes that it is not likely that the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying amount, a two-step impairment test would not be required for that reporting unit.

In the event that the conclusion of the qualitative assessment requires the two-step test, the first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than its carrying value, an indication of goodwill impairment exists for the reporting unit and the entity must perform step two of the impairment test. Under step two, an impairment loss is recognized for any excess of the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill over the implied fair value of that goodwill. The implied fair value of goodwill is determined by allocating the fair value of the reporting unit in a manner similar to a purchase price allocation and the residual fair value after this allocation is the implied fair value of the reporting unit goodwill. Fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a discounted cash flow analysis. If the fair value of the reporting unit exceeds its carrying value, step two is not required. An impairment loss is recognized to the extent that the carrying amount of goodwill exceeds its implied fair value.

If the Company recorded $9.3 millionis required to perform the two-step test, it would determine fair value using generally accepted valuation techniques, including discounted cash flows and


$16.2 million as market multiple analyses. The Company’s valuation methodology for assessing impairment would require management to make judgments and assumptions based on historical experience and projections of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to land not owned under option agreements with a corresponding increase to obligations related to land not owned under option agreements on the consolidated balance sheets.

Investment in Direct Financing Leases
Through December 31, 2014,future operating performance. If these assumptions differ materially from future results, the Company entered into a series of direct finance leases for a portfolio of model homes. The Company leased these model homes to the entity that it acquired the homes from. The lessee had the option to repurchase the model homes at a predetermined price. The direct financing leases bore interest at rates from 10% to 12%. The lease payments were recorded as interest income on direct financing leasesmay record impairment charges in the consolidated statements of income. All direct financing leases were sold in 2015.future.

Property and Equipment, Net
Property and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Repairs and maintenance are expensed as incurred. Depreciation is computed over the estimated useful lives of the assets using the straight line method. The estimated useful lives of assets range from three to ten years.

Customer and Builder Deposits
The Company typically requires customers to submit a deposit for home purchases and for builders to submit a deposit in connection with their construction loan agreements. The deposits serve as a guarantee to performance under home purchase and building contracts. Cash received as customer deposits, if held in escrow, are shown as restricted cash on the consolidated balance sheets.

Warranties

The Company accrues an estimate of its exposure to warranty claims based on both current and historical home salesclosings data and warranty costs incurred. The Company offers homeowners a comprehensive third partythird-party warranty on each home. Homes are generally covered by a ten yearten-year warranty for qualified and defined structural defects, one year for defects and products used, and two years for electrical, mechanicalplumbing, heating, ventilation, and plumbing systems. The Company accrues between $1,200air conditioning parts and $2,000 per home closed for future warranty claims, and evaluates the adequacy of the reserve annually.labor. Warranty accruals are included within accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets. Any legal costs associated with loss contingencies related to warranties are expensed as incurred.


Debt Issuance Costs

Debt issuance costs represent costs incurred related to the senior unsecured notes and revolving secured and unsecured credit facilities, including amendments thereto, and reduce the carrying amount of debt on the consolidated balance sheets. These costs are subject to capitalization to inventory over the term of the related debt facility using the straight-line method.



Business Combinations

Acquisitions are accounted for in accordance with ASC 805. Following the determination that control of a business and its inputs, processes and outputs were obtained in exchange for consideration, all material assets and liabilities of the business, including contingent consideration, are measured and recognized at fair value as of the date of the acquisition to reflect the purchase price. Depending on the fair value of net assets acquired, the purchase price allocation may or may not result in goodwill.

Contingent consideration is subsequently remeasured to fair value at each reporting date until the contingency is resolved, with any change in fair value recognized in the consolidated statements of income.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Equity of Consolidated Subsidiary

Redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary represents equity related to a put option held by a minority shareholder of a subsidiary. Based on the put option structure, the minority shareholder’s interest in the controlled subsidiary is classified as a redeemable noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets. The accretion of the redeemable noncontrolling interest to its estimated redemption value is recorded in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheets if the estimated redemption value, net of accretion, is greater than the current value of the noncontrolling interest capital account.

Revenue Recognition

Contracts with Customers

The Company derives revenues from two primary sources: the closing and delivery of homes through our builder operations segments and the closing of lots sold to homebuilders through our land development segment. All of our revenue is from contracts with customers.

Contract Liabilities

The Company requires homebuyers to submit a deposit for home purchases and requires third-party builders to submit a deposit in connection with land sale or lot option contracts. The non-refundable deposits serve as an incentive for performance under homebuilding and land sale or development contracts. Cash received as customer deposits, if held in escrow, is reflected as restricted cash and as customer and builder deposits on the consolidated balance sheets.

Performance Obligations

The Company’s contracts with homebuyers contain a single performance obligation. The performance obligation is satisfied when homes are completed and legal title has been transferred to the buyer. The Company does not have any variable consideration associated with home sales transactions.

Revenue from mechanic’s lien contracts in which the Company serves as the general contractor for custom homes where the customer, and not the Company, owns the underlying land and improvements is recognized based on the input method, where progress toward completion is measured by relating the actual cost of work performed to date to the estimated total cost of the respective contracts.

Lot option contracts contain multiple performance obligations. The performance obligations are satisfied as lots are closed and legal title has been transferred to the builder. For lot option contracts, individual performance obligations are accounted for separately. The transaction price is allocated to the separate performance obligations on a relative stand-alone selling price basis. Certain lot option contracts require escalations in lot price over the option period. Any escalator is not collectible until the lot closing occurs. While we recognize lot escalators as variable consideration within the transaction price, we do not recognize escalator revenue until a builder closes on a lot subject to an escalator as the escalator relates to general inflation and holding costs.

Occasionally, the Company sells developed and undeveloped land parcels. If the land parcel is developed prior to the sale of the land, the revenue is recognized at closing since we deliver a single performance obligation in the form of a developed parcel. We also recognize revenue at closing on undeveloped land parcel sales as there are no other obligations beyond delivering the undeveloped land.



Homebuyers are not obligated to pay for a home until the closing and delivery of the home. The selling price of a home is based on the contract price adjusted for any change orders, which are considered modifications of the contract price.

Homebuilders are not obligated to pay for developed lots prior to control of the lots and any associated improvements being transferred to them. The term of our lot option contracts is generally based upon the number of lots being purchased and an agreed upon lot takedown schedule, which can be in excess of one year. Lots cannot be taken down until development is substantially complete. There is no significant financing component related to our third-party lot sales.

The Company does not sell warranties outside of the customary workmanship warranties provided on homes or developed lots at the time of sale. The warranties offered to homebuyers are short term, with the exception of ten-year warranties on structural concerns for homes. As these are assurance-type warranties, there is no separate performance obligation related to warranties provided to homebuyers or homebuilder.

Significant Judgments and Estimates

There are no significant judgments involved in the recognition of residential units revenue. The performance obligation of delivering a completed home is satisfied upon the sale closing when title transfers to the buyer.

There are no significant judgments involved in the recognition of land and lots revenue. The performance obligation of delivering land and lots is satisfied upon the closing of the sale when title transfers to the homebuilder.

Contract Costs

The Company recognizes an asset for the incremental costs of obtaining a contract with a customer if it expects to recover those costs.

The Company pays sales commissions to employees and/or outside realtors related to individual home sales which are expensed as incurred at the time of closing. Commissions on the sale of land parcels are also expensed as incurred upon closing. Sales commissions on the sale of homes are included in the cost of revenues in the consolidated statements of income.

The Company also pays builder incentives to employees which are based on the time it takes to build individual homes, as well as quality inspection completion and customer satisfaction. The builder incentives do not represent incremental costs that would require capitalization as we would incur these costs whether or not we sold the home. As such, we recognize builder incentives as expense at the time they are paid.

Advertising costs, sales salaries and certain costs associated with model homes, such as signage, do not qualify for capitalization under ASC 340-40, Other Assets and Deferred Costs - Contracts with Customers, as they are not incremental costs of obtaining a contract. As such, we expense these costs to selling, general and administrative expense as incurred. Costs incurred related to model home furnishings and sales office construction are capitalized and included in property and equipment, net on the consolidated balance sheets.

Selling, General and Administrative Expense

Selling, general and administrative expense represents salaries, benefits, share-based compensation, property taxes on finished homes, depreciation, amortization, advertising and marketing, rent, and other administrative items, and is recorded in the period incurred.

Advertising Expense

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 totaled $2.1 million, $1.5 million and $0.8 million, respectively.

Interest Expense

Interest expense consists primarily of interest costs incurred on our debt that are not capitalized, and amortization of debt issuance costs. We capitalize interest costs incurred to inventory during development and other qualifying activities. Debt


issuance costs are capitalized to inventory over the term of the underlying debt using the straight-line method, in accordance with our interest capitalization policy. All interest costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.

Net Income Attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per Share

The Company'sCompany’s restricted stock awards have the right to receive forfeitable dividends on an equal basis with common stock and therefore are not considered participating securities that must be included in the calculation of net income per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock awards during each period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect of all dilutive securities, including stock options and restricted stock awards.

The computation of basic and diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share using the treasury stock method is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 Years End December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Basic net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share     
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. —basic$23,756
 $15,325
 $50,026
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding —basic48,879
 40,068
 14,712
Basic net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share$0.49
 $0.38
 $3.40
Diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share     
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. —diluted$23,756
 $15,325
 $50,026
Weighted-average number of shares used to compute basic net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc.48,879
 40,068
 14,712
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards7
 30
 
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding —diluted48,886
 40,099
 14,712
Diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share$0.49
 $0.38
 $3.40



The following securities that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future are not included in the determination of diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share (in thousands):
 Years End December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Antidilutive options to purchase common stock144
 62
 129

Revenue Recognition
Revenue from sales of residential units, land and lots are not recognized until a sale is deemed to be consummated. Consummation is defined as: a) when the parties are bound by the terms of a contract; b) all net consideration has been exchanged; c) any permanent financing for which the seller is responsible has been arranged; d) continuing investment is adequate to demonstrate a commitment to pay for the home; and e) all conditions precedent to closing have been performed. Generally, consummation does not happen until a sale has closed. When the earnings process is complete and a sale has closed, income is recognized under the full accrual method which allows full recognition of the gain on the sale at the time of closing.

We also serve as the general contractor for certain custom homes where the customers, and not our company, own the underlying land and improvements. We recognize revenue for these mechanics liens contracts on the percentage of completion method, where progress toward completion is measured by relating the actual cost of work performed to date to the current estimated total cost of the respective contracts. During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we recognized revenue of $12.5 million, $7.7 million and $6.9 million, respectively, and incurred costs of $11.1 million, $5.9 million and $4.4 million, respectively, associated with mechanic liens contracts, which is presented net in other income, net on the consolidated statements of income.


Cost Recognition

Lot acquisition, materials, direct costs, interest and indirect costs related to the acquisition, development, and construction of lots and homes are capitalized. Direct and indirect costs of developing residential lots are allocated evenly to all applicable lots. Capitalized costs of residential lots are charged to earnings when the related revenue is recognized. Non-capitalizable costs in connection with developed lots and completed homes and other selling and administrative costs are charged to earnings when incurred. We recognize costs as incurred on our mechanics lien contracts.

Advertising Expense
The Company expenses advertising as incurred. Advertising costs are included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. Advertising expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 totaled $0.7 million, $0.5 million and $0.4 million, respectively.

Debt Issuance Costs
Debt issuance costs of $0.8 million and $0.8 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, represent costs incurred related to the revolving and unsecured credit facilities, including amendments thereto, and are included as part of other assets, net on the consolidated balance sheets. These costs are amortized straight line through interest expense over the term of the related debt facility.


Share-Based Compensation

The Company measures and accounts for share-based awards in accordance with ASC Topic 718, Compensation - Stock Compensation. The Company expenses share-based payment awards made to employees and directors, including stock options and restricted stock awards. Share-based compensation expense associated with stock options and restricted stock awards with vesting contingent upon the achievement of service conditions is recognized on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period over which the awards are expected to vest. The Company estimates the value of stock options with vesting contingent upon the achievement of service conditions as of the date the award was granted using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The Black-Scholes option-pricingoption pricing model requires the use of certain input variables, such as expected volatility, risk-free interest rate and expected award life.


Income Taxes
Until October 27, 2014, JBGL (the accounting acquirer of Green Brick) was not a taxable entity for U.S. federal and state income tax purposes with the exception of Texas. Taxes on its net income were borne by its members through the allocation of


taxable income. Upon completion of the reverse recapitalization of Green Brick, JBGL became part of a consolidated taxable entity. The Transaction resulted in the change of JBGL’s tax status that resulted in the recognition of a one-time income tax benefit in the consolidated statement of income of approximately $26.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.

BioFuel had approximately $182.3 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards and approximately $21.6 million of state net operating loss carryforwards as of the Transaction Date. The Company re-assessed the need for a valuation allowance as of the Transaction Date and concluded, on a more-likely-than-not basis, that the deferred income tax assets, except for the state loss carryforwards, would be realized, giving consideration to the historical, current year and projected operating results of Green Brick. As a result of the re-assessment, the Company recorded $63.9 million of net deferred income tax assets at the Transaction Date, with an offset in additional paid-in-capital. The effect of the re-assessment had no impact on income tax expense.


The Company accounts for income taxes using the asset and liability method, under which deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to temporary differences between financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases, operating losses and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in years in which temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date.

The Company regularly reviews historical and anticipated future pre-tax results of operations to determine whether we will be able to realize the benefit of deferred tax assets. A valuation allowance is required to reduce the deferred tax asset when it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income. The Company establishes reservesassesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In making this assessment, management considers all available positive and negative evidence and available income tax planning to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods. This assessment requires significant judgment and estimates involving current and deferred income taxes, tax attributes relating to the interpretation of various tax laws, historical bases of tax attributes associated with certain assets and limitations surrounding the realization of deferred tax assets.

We establish accruals for uncertain tax positions that reflect itsour best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more-likely-than-not basis. The Company recognizesWe recognize interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions in the income tax provision onexpense in the consolidated statements of income. Accrued interest and penalties, if any, are included in the related tax liability account within accrued expenses on the consolidated balance sheets.

As In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the effect of December 31, 2016, we had deferredincome tax assetspositions only if those positions have a more-likely-than-not chance of $67.6 million, which was netbeing sustained by the Company. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of a valuation allowancebeing realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the amount of $1.1 million relating to state loss carryforwards. The deferred tax assets are primarily related to $40.8 million for federal net operating loss carryforwards and $22.9 million for basisperiod in partnerships. For accounting purposes, a valuation allowance is required to reduce a deferred tax asset if it is determined that it is more-likely-than-not that all or some portion ofwhich the deferred tax asset will not be realized due to the lack of sufficient taxable income or other limitation on the Company’s ability to utilize the loss carryforward. Prior to the Transaction, BioFuel had recorded a valuation allowance against the full value of the deferred tax assets related to federal and state net operating losses due to a history of operating losses. The valuation allowance attributable to deferred tax assets other than the state loss carryforwards recorded by BioFuel prior to the Transaction Date was reversed through equity on the Transaction Date.change in judgment occurs.

The net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire beginning with the year ending December 31, 2029. The Company’s ability to utilize its net operating loss carryforwards will depend on the amount of taxable income that the Company generates in future periods. Based on our 2016, 2015, and 2014 taxable income results and forecast projections of taxable income, Company management expects that the Company should generate sufficient taxable income to utilize substantially all of the net operating loss carryforwards before they expire. The Company will continue to evaluate the appropriateness of a valuation allowance in future periods based on the consideration of all available evidence, including the generation of taxable income, using the more-likely-than-not standard.



Fair Value Measurements

The Company has adopted and implemented the provisions of FASB ASC 820-10, Fair Value Measurements, with respect to fair value measurements of: (a) all elected financial assets and liabilities;liabilities and (b) any nonfinancial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed in the consolidated financial statements at fair value on a recurring basis (at least annually). Under FASB ASC 820-10, fair value is defined as an exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. These provisions establish a three-tiered fair value hierarchy that prioritizes inputs to valuation techniques used in fair value calculations. The three levels of input are defined as follows:
Level 1 —unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets accessible by the Company;
  
Level 2 —inputs that are observable in the marketplace other than those classified as Level 1; and
  
Level 3 —inputs that are unobservable in the marketplace and significant to the valuation.



Entities are encouraged to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. If a financial instrument uses inputs that fall in different levels of the hierarchy, the instrument will be categorized based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value calculation.


Our valuation methods may produce a fair value calculation that may not be indicative of net realizable value or reflective of future fair values. Furthermore, while we believe our valuation methods are appropriate and consistent with other market participants, the use of different methodologies or assumptions to determine the fair value of certain financial instruments could result in a different fair value measurement at the reporting date.


AsTransfers between levels of December 31, 2016 and 2015 there were no assets or liabilities carried atthe fair value.

Noncontrolling Interests
We own 50% controlling interests in several builders. The financial statements of these buildersvalue hierarchy are consolidated in our consolidated financial statements. The noncontrolling interests attributabledeemed to the 50% minority interests not owned by us are included as part of noncontrolling interestshave occurred on the consolidated balance sheets.date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.


Segment Information

In accordance with ASC 280, Segment Reporting(“ASC 280”), an operating segment is defined as a component of an enterprise for which discrete financial information is available and is reviewed regularly by the Chief Operating Decision Makerchief operating decision maker (“CODM”), or decision-making group, to evaluate performance and make operating decisions. The

A reportable segment is an operating segment, either separately defined or aggregated from several operating segments based on similar economic and other characteristics, that exceeds certain quantitative thresholds of ASC 280.

Effective November 15, 2019, the Company identifiedidentifies its CODM as three key executives—executives - the Chief Executive Officer, the Chief Financial Officer, and the HeadPresident of Land Acquisition and Development.Texas Region. In determining the most appropriate reportable segments, the CODM consideredconsiders similar economic and other characteristics, including geography, class of customers, product types, and production processes. During the year ended December 31, 2015, the Company organized its operations into two reportable segments: builder operations and land development. The builder operations segment includes the Company's controlled builders results, which include building and selling single-family detached homes and townhomes that are designed and built to meet local customer preferences, and the sale of lots. Builder operations consisted of two operating segments: Texas and Georgia. The land development segment includes operations related to the acquisition and development of land which is sold to the Company’s controlled builders and third-party homebuilders.

During the fourth quarter of 2016, the Company re-evaluated its reportable segments under ASC 280. As a result of the departure of the Chief Operating Officer in the fourth quarter of 2015, the management structure and CODM changed during 2016. The discrete financial information that is regularly reviewed by the current CODM group is different than in the past. As such, the builder operations reportable segment now consists of three operating segments. For the year ended December 31, 2016, the Company’s operations are organized into two reportable segments: builder operations and land development. Builder operations consist of three operating segments: Texas, Georgia, and corporate and other. The operations of the Company's controlled builders were aggregated into the builder operations reporting segment because they have similar (1) economic characteristics; (2) housing products; (3) class of homebuyer; (4) regulatory environments; and (5) methods used to construct and sell homes.

Corporate operations is a non-operating segment that develops and implements strategic initiatives and supports the Company’s builder operations and land development by centralizing certain administrative functions such as finance, treasury, information technology and human resources. The majority of corporate’s personnel and resources are primarily dedicated to activities relating to the builder operations segment. Therefore, any unallocated corporate expenses is included in the builder operations segment, within the “Corporate and other”, which accounts for 96.1%, 87.3% and 81.4% of total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. While Green Brick Title, LLC (“Green Brick Title”) operations are not economically similar to either the builder operations or land development, it did not meet the quantitative thresholds, as discussed in ASC 280, to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, Title’s results are included within the builder operations segment within the “Corporate and other” operating segment.

All prior year segment information has been restated to conform with the 2016 presentation. The changes in the reportable segments have no effect on the consolidated balance sheets, statements of income or cash flows for the periods presented.

Out-of-Period Adjustment
During the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2015, the Company recorded an out-of-period adjustment associated with a $1.9 million overaccrual of distributions payable recorded during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2014. As a result, as of December 31, 2014, accrued expenses was overstated and retained earnings were understated by $1.9 million. After evaluating


the quantitative and qualitative aspects of the out-of-period adjustment, management has determined that the adjustment is not material to the current year or any prior period financial statements.

Change in Classification
Management determined that certain indirect project costs related to field superintendents salaries and benefits, and field expenses, such as field truck, phone and travel expenses, previously classified as salary expense and selling, general and administrative expense should be classified as cost of residential units for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 to properly present cost of residential units, salary expense, and selling, general and administrative expense. We determined that the change in classification is not material to any prior period financial statements. Accordingly, we changed the classification of salary expense of $4.4 million and $3.4 million, and selling, general and administrative expense of $0.8 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, to cost of residential units. There was no impact to net income during the prior periods as a result of the change in classification.

Reclassifications
Certain prior period amounts reported in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation. Such reclassifications had no impact on previously reported operating results or financial position.


Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014,February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Updateestablished Topic 842, Leases (“ASU”Topic 842”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, by issuing ASU 2016-02, which requires an entitylessees to recognize leases on the amount of revenuebalance sheet and disclose key information about leasing arrangements. Topic 842 was subsequently amended by ASU 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to which it expectsTopic 842; ASU 2018-10, Codification Improvements to be entitled for the transfer of promised goods or services to customers. The standard will replace most existing revenue recognition guidance in GAAP when it becomes effective. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, which delayed the effective date of ASU No. 2014-09 by one year. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU 2014-09, the FASB issued several amendments in 2016 to the original standard including ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net), ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and LicensingTopic 842, Leases; and ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts2018-11, Targeted Improvements. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (“ROU”) model that requires a lessee to recognize a ROU asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow Scope Improvementsa term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and Practical Expedients. These amendments do not change the core principleclassification of the guidance stated in ASU 2014-09. Rather, they are intended to clarify and improve understanding of certain topics included in ASU 2014-09. ASU 2014-09 and the related amendments are effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. Early adoption is permitted for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016. The standard permits the use of either the full retrospective approach or the modified retrospective approach. The Company is stillexpense recognition in the processstatement of evaluating its contracts to determine the impact this standard will have on its revenue streams. income.

The Company expects to adopt the new standard under the modified retrospective approach and complete its assessment process prior to the adoption of the standard on January 1, 2018.

In February 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis, which amends the consolidation requirements in ASC 810, primarily related to limited partnerships and VIEs. This standard was effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2016. 2019. A modified retrospective transition approach is required, applying the new standard to all leases existing at the date of initial application. An entity may choose to use either (1) its effective date or (2) the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements as its date of initial application. If an entity chooses the second option, the transition requirements for existing leases also apply to leases entered into between the date of initial application and the effective date. The entity must also recast its comparative period financial statements and provide the disclosures required by the new standard for the comparative periods. We adopted the new standard on January 1, 2019 and used the effective date as our date of initial application. Consequently, financial


information will not be updated and the disclosures required under the new standard will not be provided for dates and periods before January 1, 2019.

The new standard provides a number of optional practical expedients in transition. We elected the “package of practical expedients”, which permits us not to reassess under the new standard our prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. We did not elect the use-of-hindsight or the practical expedient pertaining to land easements, the latter not being applicable to us. The new standard also provides practical expedients for an entity’s ongoing accounting. We elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that qualify. This means, for those leases that qualify, we will not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities, and this includes not recognizing ROU assets or lease liabilities for existing short-term leases of those assets in transition. We also elected the practical expedient to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of our leases.

The adoption of this standard did not have a material effect on the Company’sour consolidated financial statements and related disclosures. We believe the most significant effects relate to (1) the recognition of new ROU assets and lease liabilities on our consolidated balance sheet for our office operating leases and (2) providing new disclosures about our leasing activities. There was no change in our leasing activities as a result of adoption.


Upon adoption, we recognized additional operating liabilities of approximately $4.2 million, with corresponding ROU assets of the same amount based on the present value of the remaining minimum rental payments under current leasing standards for existing operating leases.

In April 2015,June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, Interest2016-13, Financial Instruments - ImputationCredit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance CostsCredit Losses on Financial Instruments (“ASU 2016-13”), which requires that debtchanges the impairment model for most financial assets and certain other instruments from an “incurred loss” approach to an “expected credit loss” methodology. Following the issuance costs relatedof ASU 2019-10, Financial Instruments—Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842): Effective Dates in November 2019, ASU 2016-13 is expected to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts. This standard was effective for the Company for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2022, with early adoption permitted, and requires full retrospective application on January 1, 2016. In August 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, Interest — Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements — Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting, which clarified that the SEC staff would not object to an entity deferring and presenting debt issuance costs related to a line-of-credit arrangement as an asset and subsequently amortizing the deferred debt issuance costs ratably over the term of such arrangement, regardless of whether there are any outstanding borrowings on the line-of-credit arrangement. As permitted, the Company is deferring and presenting debt issuance costs related to its lines of credit as assets and subsequently amortizing the costs straight line over the term of the lines of credit.

In November 2015, FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes, as part of its simplification initiative. The standard amends the existing guidance to require that deferred income tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified balance sheet, and eliminates the prior guidance which required an entity to separate deferred tax liabilities and assets into a current amount and a noncurrent amount in a classified balance


sheet. The standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual period. Additionally, the new guidance may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, Leases, which requires an entity that leases assets to classify the leases as either finance or operating leases and to record assets and liabilities for the rights and obligations created by long-term leases, regardless of the lease classification. The lease classification will determine whether the lease expense is recognized based on an effective interest rate method or on a straight line basis over the term of the lease. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2019 and must be adopted using a modified retrospective approach. The Company does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In March 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which simplifies several aspects related to the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, statutory tax withholding requirements and classification on the statement of cash flows. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2017.adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that this standard will haveimpact of the adoption of ASU 2016-13 on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2016, FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which reduces the existing diversity in practice in financial reporting across all industries by clarifying certain existing principles in ASC 230, Statement of Cash Flows, including providing additional guidance on how and what an entity should consider in determining the classification of certain cash receipts and cash payments. This standard is effective for the Company beginning on January 1, 2018. The Companybut does not believe that the adoption of this standard will have a material effect on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.expect such impact to be material.


In November 2016,January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows2017-04, Intangibles-Goodwill and Other (Topic 230)350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment (“ASU 2017-04”), Restricted Cash (a consensuswhich removes Step 2 of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force),goodwill impairment test. A goodwill impairment will now be determined by the amount by which requires restricted casha reporting unit’s carrying value exceeds its fair value, not to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconcilingexceed the beginning and ending amounts on the statementcarrying amount of cash flows. This standardgoodwill.  ASU 2017-04 is effective for the Companyannual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning January 1, 2018, and is to be applied using a retrospective transition method. Earlierafter December 15, 2019, with early adoption is permitted. The Company does not believe thatexpect the adoption of this standard willASU 2017-04 to have a material effectimpact on itsthe Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU 2019-12”), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions to the guidance in ASC 740, Income Taxes related to the approach for intraperiod tax allocation, the methodology for calculating income taxes in an interim period and the recognition of deferred tax liabilities for outside basis differences. ASU 2019-12 also simplifies aspects of the accounting for franchise taxes and enacted changes in tax laws or rates and clarifies the accounting for transactions that result in a step-up in the tax basis of goodwill. ASU 2019-12 is effective for annual reporting periods, and interim periods therein, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company does not expect the adoption of ASU 2019-12 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.



2. BUSINESS COMBINATION

Acquisition of GRBK GHO Homes, LLC

On April 26, 2018 (the “Acquisition Date”), following a series of transactions, the Company acquired substantially all of the assets and assumed certain liabilities of GHO Homes Corporation and its affiliates (“GHO”) through a newly formed subsidiary, GRBK GHO Homes, LLC (“GRBK GHO”), in which the Company holds an 80% controlling interest. The owner of GHO contributed $8.3 million of net assets to GRBK GHO in an exchange for a 20% interest in GRBK GHO. The minority partner of GRBK GHO serves as the president of GRBK GHO.

GRBK GHO operates primarily in the Vero Beach, Florida market and is engaged in land and lot development, as well as all aspects of the homebuilding process. The acquisition allowed the Company to expand its operations into a new geographic market.

The Company consolidates the financial statements of GRBK GHO as the Company owns 80% of the outstanding voting shares of the builder. The noncontrolling interest attributable to the 20% minority interest owned by our Florida-based partner is included as redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The original consideration of $42.2 million consisted of $33.2 million in cash paid by the Company to the owner of GHO, $8.3 million of assets contributed by the owner of GHO, and an estimated $0.6 million of contingent consideration. Following completion of the audit of the balance sheet of GHO as of the Acquisition Date, the purchase price was adjusted by $2.0 million that was contributed by the Company in cash, and the value of contributed assets from the minority partner was increased by $0.5 million. Contingent consideration was adjusted to $0.5 million based on finalization of valuation procedures. Thus, the final total consideration was $44.6 million. Total consideration for the Company’s 80% interest in GRBK GHO was $35.8 million.

Under the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company may be obligated to pay contingent consideration to our partner if certain annual performance targets are met over the three-year period following the Acquisition Date. The contingent consideration amounts are not contractually limited.
In accordance with ASC 805, all material assets and liabilities, including contingent consideration, were measured and recognized at fair value as of the date of the acquisition to reflect the purchase price.

The following is a summary of fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed (in thousands):
Assets acquired 
Cash$8,399
Inventory45,005
Property and equipment1,462
Intangible assets - trade name850
Intangible assets - home construction contracts290
Goodwill (1)
680
Other assets898
Total assets$57,584
Liabilities assumed 
Note payable$300
Accrued expenses and other liabilities5,486
Customer deposits9,073
Total liabilities$14,859
Redeemable noncontrolling interest$6,951
Net assets acquired (2)
$35,774
(1)Goodwill is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes.
(2)Contingent consideration of $0.5 million is included in the fair value of net assets acquired.



The final purchase price allocation reflected above is based upon estimates and assumptions. The Company engaged a valuation firm to assist in the allocation of the purchase price, and valuation procedures related disclosures.to the acquired assets and assumed liabilities have been completed. The estimated cash flows and ultimate valuation have been significantly affected by estimated discount rates, estimates related to expected average selling prices and sales incentives, expected sales pace and cancellation rates, expected land development and construction timelines, and anticipated land development, construction, and overhead costs and may vary significantly between communities.


The valuation of redeemable noncontrolling interest is based on a market approach, considering the equity contribution made by the 20% partner, adjusted for control and marketability factors.

Acquired inventory consisted of both land under development and work in process inventory, as well as completed homes held for sale. The estimated fair value of real estate inventory was determined on a community-by-community basis, primarily using the income approach which derives a value using a discounted cash flow for income-producing real property. The values of work in process and completed home inventory were estimated based upon the stage of production of each unit and a gross margin that we believe a market participant would require to complete the remaining construction and sales and marketing efforts through the sale of the homes. The stage of production, as of the acquisition date, ranged from recently started lots to fully completed homes. A sales comparison approach was used for land for which significant lot development had not yet begun as of the Acquisition Date. An income approach was also utilized to value mechanic’s lien home construction contracts acquired.

The estimated fair values of the acquired trade name, GHO Homes, and the home construction contracts, were determined using the relief-from-royalty method under the income approach, which involved assumptions related to revenue growth, market awareness and useful life. 

The supplemental pro forma information for revenue and earnings of the Company as though the business combination had occurred as of January 1, 2017 is impractical to provide due to the fact that consolidated reporting for the specific group of entities acquired had not existed prior to the acquisition.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, we had incurred transaction costs of $0.5 million related to the business combination, which have been expensed as incurred and are included in selling, general and administrative expense.

Intangible Assets

The amortization of the acquired intangible assets of $0.2 million for the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018 was recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. The accumulated amortization of the acquired intangible assets was $0.2 million as of December 31, 2018.

The estimated fair value of the acquired home construction contracts intangible asset was amortized to cost of residential units as income on the related contracts was earned, over a period of eleven months. As of December 31, 2019, all the home construction contracts have been completed, and the carrying value of the related intangible asset and accumulated amortization were written off with no impact to net income. As of December 31, 2019, all the home construction contracts have been completed, and the carrying value of the related intangible asset and accumulated amortization were written off with no impact to net income.

The amortization of the acquired trade name of $0.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was recorded in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income. The accumulated amortization of the acquired trade name was $0.1 million as of December 31, 2019.



The estimated amortization expense related to the acquired trade name for each of the next five years as of December 31, 2019 is as follows (in thousands):
2020$85
202185
202285
202385
202485
Total$425


Goodwill

The allocation to goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price, including contingent consideration, over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. Goodwill results primarily from operational synergies expected from the business combination.

The Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test during the fourth quarter of 2019 by completing a qualitative assessment in accordance with ASC 350. The Company determined that it was not more likely than not that the reporting unit’s estimated fair value was more than its carrying value and, therefore, the two-step goodwill impairment test was unnecessary. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Contingent Consideration

The performance targets specified in the purchase agreement were met for the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018, and contingent consideration of $1.8 million was earned by the minority partner and paid by the Company in April 2019 in addition to a $0.5 million distribution of income. The performance targets specified in the purchase agreement were met for the period from January 1, 2019 through December 31, 2019, and the contingent consideration of $5.3 million was earned by the minority partner. As of December 31, 2019, the estimate of the undiscounted contingent consideration payouts for the period from January 1, 2020 through April 26, 2021 was $0. The change in the range of estimates of the undiscounted contingent consideration compared to the range of estimates disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 was due to revision of the Company’s forecasts of GRBK GHO profits and capital requirements, as well as reduced volatility of earnings.

Redeemable Noncontrolling Interest in Equity of Consolidated Subsidiary

As part of the GRBK GHO business combination, we entered into a put/call agreement (“Put/Call Agreement”) with respect to the equity interest in the joint venture held by the minority partner. The Put/Call Agreement provided that the 20% ownership interest in GRBK GHO held by the minority partner would be subject to put and purchase options starting in April 2021. Refer to Note 18 for additional information on subsequent events. The exercise price would be based on the financial results of GRBK GHO for the three years prior to exercise of the option. If the minority partner does not exercise the put option, we have the option, but not the obligation, to buy the 20% interest in GRBK GHO from our partner.

Based on the nature of the put/call structure, the noncontrolling interest attributable to the 20% minority interest owned by our Florida-based partner is included as redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary in the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

The following table shows the changes in redeemable noncontrolling interest in equity of consolidated subsidiary during the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
  Year Ended December 31, 2019
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, beginning of period $8,531
Net income attributable to redeemable noncontrolling interest partner 3,462
Distributions of income to redeemable noncontrolling interest partner (527)
Accretion of redeemable noncontrolling interest 2,145
Redeemable noncontrolling interest, end of period $13,611




3. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAMVARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES


Effective November 30, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, SGHDAL LLC (“Southgate”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Southgate Homes DFW LLC. As a result, Southgate became an indirect wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, was no longer considered a VIE and was consolidated based on the majority voting interest pursuant to ASC 810.

Effective December 31, 2019, we, through our wholly owned subsidiary, CLH20, LLC (“Centre Living”), acquired the remaining membership and voting interests in our subsidiary, Centre Living Homes, LLC, and we contributed certain real estate inventory assets to Centre Living.

As both Centre Living, to which ownership interests were assigned and assets and liabilities were transferred, and Centre Living Homes, LLC were controlled by the Company on December 31, 2019, the acquisition of the remaining membership interest and the contribution of the real estate inventory assets were accounted for at carrying amounts on Centre Living Homes, LLC’s books on the date of the transfer, pursuant to provisions of ASC 805 that govern transactions between entities under common control.

Subsequently, the prior owner of a portion of the membership and voting interests in Centre Living Homes, LLC acquired a ten percent membership and voting interest in Centre Living for $3.6 million. As a result, as of December 31, 2019, Centre Living was an indirect subsidiary in which the Company owned a ninety percent membership interest and a ninety percent voting interest, was no longer considered a VIE and was consolidated based on the majority voting interest pursuant to ASC 810.

Consolidated VIEs
CB JENI Homes DFW LLC (“CB JENI”) and The Providence Group of Georgia LLC (“TPG”), the controlled builders based in Dallas and Atlanta, respectively, in which the Company owns a 50% equity interest and a 51% voting interest, are deemed to be VIEs for which the Company is considered the primary beneficiary. We sell finished lots and option lots from third-party developers to these controlled builders for their homebuilding operations and provide them with construction financing and strategic planning. The board of managers of each of these controlled builders has the power to direct the activities that significantly impact the controlled builder’s economic performance. Pursuant to the Company’s agreements with these controlled builders, it has the ability to appoint 2 of the 3 members to the controlled builder’s board of managers. A majority of the board of managers constitutes a quorum to transact business. No action can be approved by the board of managers without the approval from at least 1 individual whom the Company has appointed at the controlled builder.

The Company has the ability to control the activities of each controlled builder that most significantly impact the controlled builder’s economic performance. Such activities include, but are not limited to, involvement in the day to day capital and operating decisions, the ability to determine the budget and plan, the ability to control financing decisions, and the ability to acquire additional land or dispose of land. In addition, the Company has the right to receive the expected residual returns and obligation to absorb the expected losses of each controlled builder through the pro rata profits and losses we are allocated based on our ownership interest. Therefore, the financial statements of the Dallas and Atlanta-based controlled builders are consolidated in the Company’s consolidated financial statements following the variable interest model.

The aggregated carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of CB JENI and TPG consolidated following the variable interest model were $279.8 million and $265.3 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2019 and $262.9 million and $234.0 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2018. The noncontrolling interests attributable to the 50% minority interests owned by the Dallas and Atlanta-based controlled builders were included as noncontrolling interests in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The creditors of the above controlled builders have no recourse against the Company.

Unconsolidated VIEs
Land and lot option purchase contracts
The Company evaluates all option contracts to purchase land and lots to determine whether they are VIEs and, if so, whether the Company is the primary beneficiary of counterparts of these option contracts. Although the Company does not have legal title to the optioned land or lots, if the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary of or makes a significant deposit for optioned land or lots, it may need to consolidate the land or lots under option at the purchase price of the optioned land or lots.



As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company’s exposure to loss related to its option contracts with third parties primarily consisted of its non-refundable option deposits. Following VIE evaluation, it was concluded that the Company was not the primary beneficiary in any of the VIEs related to land or lot option contracts as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

EJB River Holdings, LLC

In March 2016,December 2018, EJB River Holdings, LLC joint venture (“EJB River Holdings”) was formed by TPG with the Company's Boardpurpose to acquire and develop a tract of Directors authorizedland in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In May 2019, East Jones Bridge, LLC, a Georgia limited liability company (“EJB”) was admitted as a member of EJB River Holdings, which resulted in TPG and EJB each having a 50% ownership interest in EJB River Holdings. EJB River Holdings had no activity in the period from its formation until October 2019.

In October 2019, EJB River Holdings received two $5.0 million initial contributions from its two members, TPG and EJB. In December 2019, two additional contributions of $0.3 million were made by TPG and EJB to EJB River Holdings. Per EJB River Holdings’ operating agreement, TPG and EJB share repurchase programequally in the profits and losses of upEJB River Holdings, with the exception of certain customary fees.

In October 2019, EJB River Holdings issued two loans with the total maximum amount of borrowings of $21.9 million to 1,000,000finance its land acquisition and development in Gwinnett County, Georgia. One of the investors in EJB issued a personal guarantee on one of the loans in the amount of $9.4 million. Subsequently, in October 2019, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company provided a limited $2.0 million guarantee to the investor in EJB. The approximate term of the guarantee is 35 months. In the event EJB River Holdings defaults on its $9.4 million loan and the investor in EJB makes the $9.4 million payment under his personal guarantee, the maximum potential amount of future payments that the Company could be required to make under its limited guarantee is $2.0 million. As of December 31, 2019, the Company has no current liability related to the guarantee obligation as the payment risk of the guarantee has been assessed to be very low.

Following the analysis of the above facts and provisions of EJB River Holdings’ operating agreement, the Company has determined that EJB River Holdings is a VIE in which the Company is not the primary beneficiary. Therefore, the investment in EJB River Holdings was treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and was included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

As of December 31, 2019, the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities of EJB River Holdings were $23.7 million and $13.1 million, respectively. Assets were comprised of real estate inventory and cash, whereas the liabilities were comprised of loans and interest payable. As of December 31, 2019, the Company’s maximum exposure to loss as a result of its involvement with EJB River Holdings was $7.3 million, represented by the sum of the Company’ investment in EJB River Holdings of $5.3 million and the $2.0 million limited guarantee described above.

4. INVENTORY

A summary of inventory is as follows (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2019
 December 31, 2018
Homes completed or under construction$314,966
 $268,763
Land and lots - developed and under development437,553
 399,809
Land held for sale1,048
 389
Total inventory$753,567
 $668,961


A summary of interest costs incurred, capitalized and expensed is as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Interest capitalized at beginning of period$14,780
 $10,474
 $9,417
Interest incurred12,140
 9,003
 4,456
Interest charged to cost of revenues(8,324) (4,697) (3,399)
Interest capitalized at end of period$18,596
 $14,780
 $10,474




As of December 31, 2019, the Company reviewed the performance and outlook for all of its communities for indicators of potential impairment and performed detailed impairment analysis when necessary. As of December 31, 2019, the Company performed further impairment analysis of the selling communities with indicators of impairment with a combined corresponding carrying value of approximately $11.2 million.

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, the Company recorded impairment adjustments of $0.1 million, $0.1 million, and $0.1 million, respectively, to reduce the carrying value of impaired communities to fair value. The recorded impairment adjustments related to real estate inventory in our builder operations segments and were included in cost of residential units in our consolidated statements of income.

5. INVESTMENTS IN UNCONSOLIDATED ENTITIES

Challenger

On August 15, 2017, the Company, JBGL and GB Challenger, LLC, a Texas limited liability company (“Challenger”) entered into a Membership Interest Purchase and Contribution Agreement (the “Challenger Agreement”) with The Challenger Group, Inc., a Wyoming corporation (“TCGI”), and certain of its affiliates (the “Challenger Entities”) and Brian R. Bahr (“Bahr”), resulting in the Company, through its interest in JBGL, and the Challenger Entities owning a 49.9% and 50.1% ownership interest, respectively, in Challenger, and Challenger owning all of the membership and ownership interests in the subsidiaries of the Challenger Entities named in the Challenger Agreement.

As consideration for such interests, the Company agreed to issue to the Challenger Entities, or their designees, 1,497,000 shares of its common stock, throughpar value $0.01 per share, in a private placement, with 20,000 shares of its common stock held back pending satisfactory resolution of indemnification claims (“Holdback Shares”). On March 16, 2018, the Company issued the Holdback Shares; therefore, $0.2 million was recorded in additional paid-in capital on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2017. The timing, volumeChallenger Entities, at their discretion, may offer to sell and nature of share repurchases will be at the discretion of management and dependent on market conditions, corporate and regulatory requirements and other factors, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. The authorized repurchases will be made from time to time in the open market, through block tradestransfer an additional 20.1% or, in privately negotiated transactions. No assurance can be given that any particular amount of common stock will be repurchased. All or partcertain circumstances, all of the repurchases may be implemented under a Rule 10b5-1 trading plan, which would allow repurchases under pre-set terms at times when we might otherwise be prevented from doing so under insider trading lawsChallenger Entities’ interest in Challenger (“Additional Membership Interests”) to the Company on or becauseafter the third anniversary of self-imposed blackout periods. This repurchase program may be modified, extended or terminated at the discretion of our Board of Directors at any time. We intendChallenger Agreement. The Company is not required to financepurchase the repurchases with available cash. No shares were repurchasedAdditional Membership Interests. The Company incurred $0.3 million in related acquisition costs during the year ended December 31, 2016.2017 which are included in the cost basis of investment in the unconsolidated entity.


The Challenger Entities operate homebuilding operations under the name Challenger Homes. Challenger constructs townhouses, single family homes and luxury patio homes, and is located in Colorado Springs, Colorado. The Company partnered with Challenger in order to expand its business with partners that are complementary to its current builder partner group and to gain a presence in the Colorado Springs market.

The issuance of the common stock by the Company related to the investment in Challenger was exempt from registration pursuant to Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and the safe harbor provided by Rule 506 promulgated thereunder. The Company relied, in part, upon representations from each of the individuals that they are “accredited investors” as such term is defined in Rule 501 of Regulation D.

The Company’s investment in Challenger at August 15, 2017 of $15.1 million was more than its share of the estimated underlying net assets of Challenger, resulting in a preliminary difference in basis of $5.1 million, which was attributed to inventory and intangible assets.





4.The Company’s investment in Challenger on August 15, 2017 was determined as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
Consideration transferred at closing 
Green Brick common stock issued1,477
Price per share of Green Brick common stock (1)$9.90
Fair value of common stock consideration$14,622
  
Acquisition related costs$241
Total fair value of consideration$14,863
  
Subsequent consideration 
Holdback Shares20
Price per share of Green Brick common stock (1)$9.90
Total fair value of subsequent consideration$198
  
Total fair value of consideration$15,061
(1)Based upon closing price of the Company’s common stock upon the parties’ execution of the Challenger Agreement.

The Company holds 2 of the 5 board of managers (the “Managers”) seats of Challenger. Challenger’s 6 officers, employees of the Challenger Entities, were designated by the Managers for the purpose of managing the day to day operations. The Company does not have a controlling financial interest in Challenger as the Company has less than 50% of the voting interests in Challenger. The Company’s investment in Challenger is treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and is included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

The Company’s investment in Challenger is carried at cost, as adjusted for the Company’s share of income or losses and distributions received, as well as for adjustments related to basis differences between the Company’s cost and the Company’s underlying equity in net assets recorded in Challenger’s financial statements as of the date of acquisition.

As of December 31, 2019, the carrying value of the investment in Challenger was $23.8 million, whereas the underlying 49.9% equity in net assets of Challenger was $19.6 million. The $4.2 million difference represents the premium paid for the Company’s equity interest in excess of Challenger’s carrying value. This basis difference primarily relates to the estimated fair value of inventory, as well as the Challenger Homes trade name and capitalized acquisition costs. The amortization of the basis differences related to inventory is recorded as a reduction of equity in income of unconsolidated entities as homes are closed on and delivered to homebuyers. The basis difference related to the trade name is amortized over ten years as a reduction of equity in income of unconsolidated entities.

The Company recognized $8.3 million, $7.0 million, and $2.7 million related to Challenger in equity in income of unconsolidated entities during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, respectively.

Providence Title

In March 2018, the Company formed a joint venture with a title company in Georgia to provide title closing and settlement services to our Atlanta-based builder. The Company, through its controlled builder, The Providence Group of Georgia, L.L.C. (“TPG”), owns a 49% equity interest in Providence Group Title, LLC (“Providence Title”). The Company determined that the investment in Providence Title should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Green Brick Mortgage

In June 2018, the Company formed a joint venture with PrimeLending to provide mortgage loan origination services to our builders. The Company owns a 49% equity interest in Green Brick Mortgage, LLC (“Green Brick Mortgage”) which initiated mortgage loan origination activities in September 2018. The Company determined that the investment in Green Brick Mortgage


should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

EJB River Holdings

In December 2018, EJB River Holdings joint venture was formed by TPG with the purpose to acquire and develop a tract of land in Gwinnett County, Georgia. In May 2019, EJB was admitted as a member of EJB River Holdings, which resulted in TPG and EJB each having a 50% ownership interest in EJB River Holdings. EJB River Holdings had no activity in the period from its formation until October 2019. Please refer to Note 3 for more information.

The Company determined that the investment in EJB River Holdings should be treated as an unconsolidated investment under the equity method of accounting and included in investments in unconsolidated entities in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

A summary of the financial information of the unconsolidated entities that are accounted for by the equity method is as follows (in thousands):
   December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Assets:     
Cash  $11,699
 $14,584
Accounts receivable  3,252
 1,259
Bonds and notes receivable  5,864
 5,864
Loans held for sale, at fair value  23,143
 3,083
Inventory  73,704
 44,375
Other assets  4,012
 3,132
Total assets  $121,674
 $72,297
Liabilities:     
Accounts payable  $1,726
 $2,173
Accrued expenses and other liabilities  7,784
 5,328
Notes payable  58,223
 31,402
Total liabilities  $67,733
 $38,903
Owners’ equity:     
Green Brick  $25,910
 $15,653
Others  28,031
 17,741
Total owners’ equity  $53,941
 $33,394
Total liabilities and owners’ equity  $121,674
 $72,297
      
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Revenues$166,368
 $166,102
 $58,958
Costs and expenses144,097
 148,222
 44,969
Net earnings of unconsolidated entities$22,271
 $17,880
 $13,989
Company’s share in net earnings of unconsolidated entities$9,809
 $7,259
 $2,746


During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017, the Company did not identify indicators of impairment for its investments in unconsolidated entities.



6. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT


The following is a summary of property and equipment by major classification and related accumulated depreciation by major classification as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 (in thousands):
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Land$763
 $763
Building180
 82
Model home furnishings and capitalized sales office costs6,090
 5,218
Office furniture and equipment424
 427
Leasehold improvements1,824
 1,692
Computers and equipment912
 901
Vehicles and field trailers357
 279
 10,550
 9,362
Less: accumulated deprecation(6,241) (4,672)
Total property and equipment, net$4,309
 $4,690

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Office furniture and equipment$333
 $258
Leasehold improvements166
 595
Computers and equipment836
 108
Field trailers10
 10
Design center470
 470
 1,815
 1,441
Less: accumulated depreciation(923) (639)
Total property and equipment, net$892
 $802


Depreciation expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 totaled $0.3$2.9 million, $0.3$2.7 million, and $0.2$0.3 million, respectively, and is included in selling, general and administrative expense in our consolidated statements of income.


5. EARNEST MONEY DEPOSITS7. DEBT


Earnest money deposits actThe aggregated annual principal payments under the borrowings on lines of credit and senior unsecured notes over the next five years as security for option agreements for the purchase of land for the construction of homes in the future. As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, there were 954 and 1,084 lots under option, respectively, with a total exercise price of approximately $84.0 million and $79.3 million, respectively. The option agreements in place as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 provide for potential land purchase payments in each year through 2019.

If each option agreement in place as of December 31, 2016 was exercised, expected land purchase payments under these agreements would be as follows2019 are (in thousands):
2020$
202117,860
2022148,140
2023
202412,500
Thereafter62,500
Total$241,000

 Total
2017$39,508
201833,444
201911,073
 $84,025

6. DEBT


Lines of Credit
Lines
Borrowings on lines of credit outstanding, net of debt issuance costs, as of December 31, 20162019 and 20152018 consist of the following (in thousands):
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Secured revolving credit facility$38,000
 $46,500
Unsecured revolving credit facility128,000
 155,500
Debt issuance costs, net of amortization(1,358) (1,614)
Total borrowings on lines of credit, net$164,642
 $200,386

 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Promissory note to Inwood National Bank (“Inwood”):   
Revolving credit facility(1)
$15,000
 $17,500
Unsecured revolving credit facility(2)
60,000
 30,000
Total lines of credit$75,000
 $47,500

Secured Revolving Credit Facility

(1)On July 30, 2015, the Company replaced its John’s Creek credit facility with a new revolving credit facility with Inwood, which provides for up to $50.0 million and is secured by land owned in John’s Creek, Georgia, Allen, Texas, and Carrollton, Texas. The costs associated with the new revolving credit facility of $0.4 million were deferred and
On July 30, 2015, the Company entered into a secured revolving credit facility (the “Secured Revolving Credit Facility”) with Inwood National Bank, which initially provided for up to $50.0 million. Amounts outstanding under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company is amortizing these debt issuance costs to interest expense over the term of the new revolving credit facility using the straight line method. Amounts outstanding under the new revolving credit facility is secured by mortgages on real property and security interests in certain personal property (to the extent that such personal property is connected with the use and enjoyment of the real property) that is owned by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, including land owned in John’s Creek, Georgia, Allen, Texas, and Carrollton, Texas. The amounts outstanding under the new revolving credit facility are also guaranteed by certain of the Company's subsidiaries.


Before the amendment (as discussed below), the new revolving credit facility was subject to a borrowing base limitation equal to the sum of 50% of the total value of land and 60% of the total value of lots owned by certain of the Company's subsidiaries, eachCompany’s subsidiaries.



The entire unpaid principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable on the maturity date. Following several amendments, as determined by an independent appraiser, withof December 31, 2019, the value of land being restricted from being more than 50%aggregate commitment amount was $75.0 million and the maturity date of the borrowing base. OutstandingSecured Revolving Credit Facility was May 1, 2022.

As of December 31, 2019, letters of credit outstanding totaling $8.9 million reduced the aggregate maximum commitment amount to $66.1 million.

As of December 31, 2019, outstanding borrowings under the new revolving credit facilityamended Secured Revolving Credit Facility bear interest payable monthly at a floating rate per annum equal to the rate announced by Bank of America, N.A., from time to time, as its “Prime Rate” (the “Index”) with such adjustments to the interest rate being made on the effective date of any change in the Index.Index, less 0.25%. Notwithstanding the foregoing, the interest may not, at any time, be less than 4% per annum or more than the lesser amount of 18% and the highest maximum rate allowed by applicable law. The entire unpaid principal balance and any accrued but unpaid interest is due and payable on the maturity date. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the interest rate on outstanding borrowings under the Secured Revolving Credit Facility was 4.0%4.50% per annum.
On May 3, 2016,
As of December 31, 2019, the Company amended the new revolving credit facility. The amended revolving credit facility isSecured Revolving Credit Facility was subject to a borrowing base limitation equal to the sum of 50% of the total value of land and 65% of the total value of lots owned by certain of the Company'sCompany’s subsidiaries, each as determined by an independent appraiser, with the value of land being restricted from being more than 65% of the borrowing base. Beginning on August 1, 2017,

As of December 31, 2019, the amended Secured Revolving Credit Facility was also subject to a non-usage fee equal to 0.25% of the average unfunded amount of the $50.0 million commitment amount over a trailing 12 month period is due on or before August 1st of each year during the term of the amended revolving credit facility. The maturity date has been extended to May 1, 2019. The costs associated with the amendment of $0.1 million were deferred and are included in other assets, net in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company is amortizing these debt issuance costs to interest expense over the term of the loan using the straight line method.period.

Under the terms of the new revolving credit facility,amended Secured Revolving Credit Facility, the Company is required, among other things, to maintain minimum multiples of tangible net worth in excess of the outstanding new revolving credit facilitySecured Revolving Credit Facility balance, minimum interest coverage and maximum leverage. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the revolving credit facilitySecured Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2016.2019.
(2)On December 15, 2015, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, providing for a senior, unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate lending commitments of up to $40.0 million (“Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility”). Before the First Amendment (as defined and discussed below) increased the maximum amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, the Company could, at its option and subject to certain terms and conditions, prior to the termination date, increase the amount of the revolving credit facility up to a maximum aggregate amount of $75.0 million. Before the Second Amendment (as defined and discussed below), commitments under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility were available until the period ending December 14, 2018. Citibank, N.A. and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch initially committed to provide $25.0 million and $15.0 million, respectively.
The
Fees and other debt issuance costs of $0.0 million, $0.0 million and $0.2 million were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, associated with the UnsecuredSecured Revolving Credit Facility of $0.5 million wereamendments. These costs are deferred and are included in other assets, netreduce the carrying amount of debt in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company is amortizingcapitalizes these debt issuance costs to interest expenseinventory over the term of the loanSecured Revolving Credit Facility using the straight linestraight-line method.

Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility

On December 15, 2015, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with Citibank, N.A. and Credit Suisse AG, Cayman Islands Branch (“Credit Suisse”) as lenders, and Citibank, N.A. as administrative agent, providing for a senior, unsecured revolving credit facility with initial aggregate lending commitments of up to $40.0 million (the “Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility”).

The Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility provides for interest rate options on advances at rates equal to either: (x)(a) in the case of base rate advances, the highest of (i)(1) Citibank’s base rate, (ii)(2) the federal funds rate plus 0.5%, and (iii)(3) the one-month LIBOR plus 1.0%, in each case plus 1.5%; or (y)(b) in the case of Eurodollar rate advances, the reserve adjusted LIBOR plus 2.5%. Interest on amounts borrowed under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility is payable in arrears quarterly on the last day of each March, June, September and December during such periods.a monthly basis. As of December 31, 2016,2019, the interest raterates on outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility was 3.3%ranged from 4.25% to 4.30% per annum.

The Company pays the lenders a commitment fee on the amount of the unused commitments on a quarterly basis at a rate per annum equal to 0.45%.

Outstanding borrowings under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility are subject to, among other things, a borrowing base. The borrowing base limitation is equal to the sum of: 100% of unrestricted cash (inin excess of $15.0 million);million; 85% of the book value of model homes, construction in progress homes, sold completed homes,sold and speculative homes (subject to certain limitations on the age and number of speculative homes and model homes); 65% of the book value of finished lots and land under development; and 50% of the book value of entitled land (subject to certain limitations on the value of entitled land and land under development as a percentage of the borrowing base).
On August 31, 2016, the Company, entered into a First Amendment
Following amendments to the Credit Agreement (the “First Amendment”), withand the addition of Flagstar Bank, FSB (“Flagstar Bank”), theJPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“JPMorgan”) and Chemical Financial Corporation (“Chemical”) as lenders, named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, which amended the Credit Agreement. The First Amendment added Flagstar Bank as a lender under the Credit Agreement, with an initial commitment of $20.0 million, which increased the aggregate lending commitmentscommitment available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $40.0as of December 31, 2019 was $215.0 million, to $60.0 million. The First Amendment also increased the maximum amount




maximum aggregate amount of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility to a maximum aggregate amount of $110.0was $275.0 million, which further increases are available at the Company’s option, prior to the termination date, subject to certain terms and conditions. The costs associated with the First Amendment of $0.2 million were deferred and are included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets.
On December 1, 2016, the Company, entered into a Second Amendment to the Credit Agreement (the “Second Amendment”), with the lenders named therein, and Citibank, N.A., as administrative agent, which amended the Credit Agreement. The Second Amendment, among other things, extended the termination date with respect to commitments under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility fromwas December 14, 2018 to2021 for $30.0 million and December 14, 2019. The Second Amendment became effective upon the payment of an upfront fee of 0.15%2022 for $185.0 million out of the aggregate lending commitment of $215.0 million.

Fees and other debt issuance costs of $0.3 million, $0.9 million and $0.7 million were incurred during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, associated with the amendments, term extensions and increases in lenders’ commitments. These costs are deferred and reduce the carrying amount of any extended commitments on December 15, 2016. Additionally, Citibank, N.A. increased its commitment underdebt in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company capitalizes these costs to inventory over the term of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $25.0 million to $35.0 million which increasedusing the aggregate lending commitments available under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $60.0 million to $70.0 million. The costs associated with the Second Amendment of $0.1 million were deferred and are included in other assets, net in the consolidated balance sheets.straight-line method.
On March 6, 2017, Flagstar Bank increased its commitment under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility from $20.0 million to $35.0 million, which increased the aggregate lending commitments available under the Revolving Credit Facility from $70.0 million to $85.0 million.
Additionally, underUnder the terms of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility, the Company is required to maintain compliance with various financial covenants, including a maximum leverage ratio, a minimum interest coverage ratio, and a minimum consolidated tangible net worth. The Company was in compliance with these financial covenants under the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2019.

Senior Unsecured Notes

On August 8, 2019, the Company issued $75.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior unsecured notes due on August 8, 2026 at a fixed rate of 4.00% per annum to Prudential Private Capital in a Section 4(a)(2) private placement transaction and received net proceeds of $73.3 million. A brokerage fee of approximately $1.5 million associated with the issuance was paid at closing. The brokerage fee, and other debt issuance costs of approximately $0.2 million, were deferred and reduced the amount of debt on our consolidated balance sheet. The Company used the net proceeds from the issuance of the senior unsecured notes to repay borrowings under the Company’s existing revolving credit facilities.

Principal on the senior unsecured notes is required to be paid in increments of $12.5 million on August 8, 2024 and $12.5 million on August 8, 2025. The final principal payment of $50.0 million is due on August 8, 2026. Optional prepayment is allowed with payment of a “make-whole” premium which fluctuates depending on market interest rates. Interest is payable quarterly in arrears commencing November 8, 2019.

Under the terms of the senior unsecured notes, the Company is required, among other things, to maintain compliance with various financial covenants, including financial covenants relating to a maximum Leverage Ratio,leverage ratios, a minimum Interest Coverage Ratio,interest coverage ratio, and a minimum Consolidated Tangible Net Worth, each as defined therein.consolidated tangible net worth. The Company's compliance with these financial covenants is measured by calculations and metrics thatsenior unsecured notes are specifically defined or describedguaranteed on an unsecured senior basis by the termsCompany’s significant subsidiaries and certain other subsidiaries. The senior unsecured notes will rank equally in right of payment with all of the Unsecured Revolving Credit Facility. The Company was in compliance with these covenants as of December 31, 2016.Company’s existing and future senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness.

Notes Payable
Notes payable outstanding as of December 31, 2016 and 2015 consist of the following (in thousands):
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Notes payable to unrelated third parties:   
Briar Ridge Investments, LTD(1)
$9,000
 $9,000
Lyons Equities, Inc. Trustee(2)

 988
Wretched Land, LP(3)
713
 
Graham Mortgage Corporation(4)
1,235
 
Subordinated Lot Notes(5)

 170
Total notes payable$10,948
 $10,158
(1)On December 13, 2013, a subsidiary of JBGL signed a promissory note for $9 million maturing at December 13, 2017, bearing interest at 6.0% collateralized by land purchased in Allen, Texas. Accrued interest as of December 31, 2016 was $0. In December 2016, this note was extended through December 31, 2018.
(2)On May 22, 2015, a subsidiary of JBGL signed a promissory note for $1.0 million maturing on May 22, 2016, bearing interest at 3.5% per annum collateralized by land located in Allen, Texas. The note was paid off during May 2016.
(3)On August 19, 2016, a subsidiary of JBGL signed a promissory note for $1.4 million maturing on January 1, 2017, bearing interest at 2.0% per annum and collateralized by land located in Allen Texas. $0.7 million of this note was repaid during September 2016. In December 2016, this note was extended through March 1, 2017. The note was paid off on March 1, 2017.
(4)On November 30, 2016, a subsidiary of JBGL signed a promissory note for $1.2 million maturing on December 1, 2018, bearing interest at 3.0% per annum and collateralized by land located in Sunnyvale, Texas.
(5)Subsidiaries of the Company purchased lots under various agreements from unrelated third parties. The sellers of these lots had subordinated a percentage of the lot purchase price to various construction loans of subsidiaries of the Company’s construction loans. Notes were signed in relation to the subordination bearing interest between 8.0% and 14.0%, collateralized by liens on the homes built on each lot. The sellers released their lien upon payment of principle plus accrued interest at the closing of each individual home to a third party buyer. The subordinated lot notes were paid off during the three months ended March 31, 2016.



The approximate annual minimum principal payments over the next five years under the debt agreements as of December 31, 2016 are (in thousands):
 Line of Credit Notes Payable Total
2017$
 $713
 $713
2018
 10,235
 10,235
201975,000
 
 75,000
2020
 
 
2021 and thereafter
 
 
 $75,000
 $10,948
 $85,948


7.8. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock
Pursuant to the Company’s amended and restated certificate of incorporation (“Certificate of Incorporation”), the Company is authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of December 31, 2019, there were 50,879,949 shares of common stock issued and 50,488,010 outstanding.

On March 16, 2018, 20,000 shares of common stock were issued as additional consideration for the investment in Challenger upon resolution of terms for such holdback shares.

Preferred Stock
Pursuant to the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation, the Company is authorized to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.01 per share. The Board of Directors (the “BOD”) has the authority, subject to any limitations imposed by law or Nasdaq rules, without further action by the stockholders, to issue such preferred stock in one or more series and to fix the voting powers (if any), the preferences and relative, participating, optional or other special rights or privileges, if any, of such series and the qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof. These rights, preferences and privileges may include, but are not limited to, dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, sinking fund terms and the number of shares constituting any series or the designation of that series. As of December 31, 2019, there were 0 shares of preferred stock issued and outstanding.



Share Repurchase Programs
In March 2016, the Company’s BOD authorized a share repurchase program of up to 1,000,000 shares of its common stock through 2017. The share repurchase program expired in 2017. NaN shares were repurchased during the year ended December 31, 2017.

In October 2018, the Company’s BOD authorized a share repurchase program for the period beginning on October 3, 2018 and ending on October 3, 2020 of the Company’s common stock for an aggregate price not to exceed $30.0 million. The timing, volume and nature of share repurchases are at the discretion of management and dependent on market conditions, corporate and regulatory requirements, available cash and other factors, and may be suspended or discontinued at any time. Authorized repurchases may be made from time to time in the open market, through block trades or in privately negotiated transactions. No assurance can be given that any particular amount of common stock will be repurchased. All or part of the repurchases may be implemented under a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 or Rule 10b-18 established by the SEC, which would allow repurchases under pre-set terms at times when the Company might otherwise be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed blackout periods. This repurchase program may be modified, extended or terminated by the BOD at any time. The Company intends to finance any repurchases with available cash and proceeds from borrowings under lines of credit.

In December 2018, the Company repurchased 136,756 shares for approximately $1.0 million.

On December 31, 2018, the Company’s BOD authorized implementation of share repurchases in accordance with a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 (the “December 2018 Trading Plan”) within the 2018 Share Repurchase Program. The trading plan was effective from January 2, 2019 until March 30, 2019. In January 2019, the Company repurchased 7,862 shares for approximately $0.1 million under the December 2018 Trading Plan.

In June 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized discrete repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program of 39,320 shares for approximately $0.3 million.

On June 27, 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized implementation of share repurchases in accordance with a trading plan under Rule 10b5-1 (the “June 2019 Trading Plan”) within the 2018 Share Repurchase Program. The trading plan was effective from July 1, 2019 until August 5, 2019. In July 2019, the Company repurchased 144,584 shares for approximately $1.2 million under the June 2019 Trading Plan.

In September 2019, the Company’s BOD authorized discrete repurchases under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program of 63,417 shares for approximately $0.6 million.

As of December 31, 2019, the remaining dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the 2018 Share Repurchase Program was $26.8 million.

9. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION


2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Equity Plan”)
On October 17, 2014, the Company’s stockholders approved the Green Brick Partners, Inc. 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Equity Plan”). The Board of Directors of the Company had previously approved the 2014 Equity Plan on July 8, 2014, subject to stockholder approval. The 2014 Equity Plan became effective upon the completion of the Transaction on October 27, 2014. The purpose of the 2014 Equity Plan is to provide a means for the Company to attract and retain key personnel and to provide a means whereby current and prospective directors, officers, employees, consultants and advisors can acquire and maintain an equity interest in the Company, or be paid incentive compensation, which may (but need not) be measured by reference to the value of the Company’s common stock, thereby strengthening their commitment to the welfare of the Company and aligning their interests with those of the Company’s stockholders. The 2014 Equity Plan will terminate automatically on the tenth anniversary of the date it becomesbecame effective. No awards will be granted under the 2014 Equity Plan after that date, but awards granted prior to that date may extend beyond that date.


Under the 2014 Equity Plan, awards of stock options, including both incentive stock options and nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock and restricted stock units, other share-based awards and performance compensation awards, may be granted. The maximum number of shares of the Company’s common stock that is authorized and reserved for issuance under the 2014 Equity Plan is 2,350,956 shares, subject to adjustment for certain corporate events or changes in the Company’s capital structure.




In general, the Company’s employees or those reasonably expected to become the Company'sCompany’s employees, consultants and directors, are eligible for awards under the 2014 Equity Plan, provided that incentive stock options may be granted only to employees. After the consummation of the Transaction and the effectiveness of the 2014 Equity Plan, theThe Company has three executive officers, six6 non-employee directors and approximately 220 other460 employees (including employees of our controlled builders) who are eligible to receive awards under the 2014 Equity Plan. A written agreementWritten agreements between the Company and each participant will evidence the terms of each award granted under the 2014 Equity Plan.


The shares that may be issued pursuant to awards are shares of the Company’s common stock and the maximum aggregate amount of common stock which may be issued upon exercise of all awards under the 2014 Equity Plan, including incentive stock options, may not exceed 2,350,956 shares, subject to adjustment to reflect certain corporate transactions or changes in the Company’s capital structure. If any award under the 2014 Equity Plan expires or otherwise terminates, in whole or in part, without having been exercised in full, the common stock withheld from issuance under that award will become available for future issuance under the plan. If shares issued under the 2014 Equity Plan are reacquired by the Company pursuant to the terms of any forfeiture provision, those shares will become available for future awards under the plan. Awards that can only be settled in cash will not be treated as shares of common stock granted for purposes of the 2014 Equity Plan. The maximum amount that can be paid to any single participant in any one calendar year pursuant to a cash bonus award under the 2014 Equity Plan is $2,000,000.$2.0 million. As of December 31, 2016, 2,186,0282019, 1,656,703 shares remain available for future grant of awards under the 2014 Equity Plan.


Share-Based Award Activity
During the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, the Company granted restricted stock awards (“RSAs”) under the 2014 Equity Plan to Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”EOs”) and non-employee Boardmembers of Directors (“BODs”).the BOD. The RSAs granted to the NEOsEOs were 100% vested and non-forfeitable on the grant date. The Company's non-employee BODsSome members of the BOD elected to defer up to 100% of their annual retainer fee chairman fees and meeting fees in the form of common stock. The RSAs granted to the non-employee


BODsBOD will become fully vested on the earlier of (i) the first anniversary of the date of grant of the shares of restricted common stock or (ii) the date of the Company's 2017Company’s 2019 Annual Meeting of Stockholders. The fair value of the RSAs granted to the NEOsEOs and non-employee BODsmembers of the BOD were recorded as share-based compensation expense on the grant date and over the vesting period, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company withheld 59,116 shares of common stock from EOs, at a total cost of $0.5 million, to satisfy statutory minimum tax requirements upon grant of the RSAs.


A summary of share-based awards activity during the yearyears ended December 31, 20162019, 2018 and 2017 is as follows:
 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Nonvested, December 31, 201638
 $7.51
Granted229
 $10.11
Vested(229) $9.66
Forfeited
 $
Nonvested, December 31, 201738
 $10.25
Granted140
 $10.45
Vested(144) $10.03
Forfeited
 $
Nonvested, December 31, 201834
 $12.00
Granted219
 $9.14
Vested(194) $9.67
Forfeited
 $
Nonvested, December 31, 201959
 $9.05

 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value per Share
Nonvested, December 31, 201523
 $8.73
Granted123
 $7.60
Vested(108) $7.87
Forfeited
 $
Nonvested, December 31, 201638
 $7.51


Stock Options
Stock options granted to date were not granted under the 2014 Equity Plan. The stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2016, generally vest2019 vested and becomebecame exercisable in five substantially equal installments on each of the first five anniversaries of the grant date and expire 10 years after the date on which they were granted. Compensation expense related to these options iswas expensed on a straight linestraight-line basis over the five5 years year service period. All of the stock options outstanding as of December 31, 20162019 are vested or expected to vest. There were no stock options issued during the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

A summary of stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows:
 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Options outstanding, December 31, 2015500
 $7.49
    
Granted
 
    
Exercised
 
    
Forfeited
 
    
Options outstanding, December 31, 2016500
 $7.49
 7.73 $
Options exercisable, December 31, 2016200
 $7.49
 7.73 $

A summary of our unvested stock options during the year ended December 31, 2016 is as follows (shares in thousands):
 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Per Share Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 2015400
 $2.88
Granted
 $
Vested(100) $2.88
Forfeited
 $
Unvested, December 31, 2016300
 $2.88

Valuation of Share-Based Awards
vested. We utilized the Black-Scholes option pricing model for estimating the grant date fair value of stock options with the following assumptions:
 Risk-Free Interest Rate Expected Term (in years) Weighted Average Expected Stock Price Volatility Expected Dividend Yield Weighted Average Per Share Grant Date Fair Value
Fiscal year 20141.94% 6.5 37.2% % $



We based the risk-free interest rates on the implied yield available on U.S. Treasury constant maturities in effect at the time of the grant with remaining terms equivalent to the respective expected terms of the stock options. Because we do not have any historyThere were 0 stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017.



A summary of stock option exercises, we calculated the expected award term using the simplified method. We determined the expected volatility based on a combination of implied market volatilities and other factors. We have not paid any dividends since our inception and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.

In addition to the variables above, we are also required to estimate at the grant date the likelihood that the award will ultimately vest (the “pre-vesting forfeiture rate”), and revise the estimate, if necessary, in future periods if the actual forfeiture rate differs. We determine the forfeiture rate based on historical activity of the grantees, including the groups in which the grantees are part of, such as directors, executives and employees. We utilized a forfeiture rate of 0% during the year ended December 31, 2014.2019 is as follows:

 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years) Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)
Options outstanding, December 31, 2018500
 $7.49
    
Granted
 
      
Exercised
 
      
Forfeited
 
    
Options outstanding, December 31, 2019500
 $7.49
 4.82 $1,995
Options exercisable, December 31, 2019500
 $7.49
 4.82 $1,995


A summary of unvested stock option activity during the year ended December 31, 2019 is as follows:
 Number of Shares (in thousands) Weighted Average Per Share Grant Date Fair Value
Unvested, December 31, 2018100
 $2.88
Granted
 $
Vested(100) $2.88
Forfeited
 $
Unvested, December 31, 2019
 $2.88


Share-Based Compensation Expense
Share-based compensation expense was approximately $1.3$2.2 million, $0.5$1.8 million and $0.1$2.6 million for the years ended 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. Recognized tax benefit related to share-based compensation expense was $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017, respectively.

As of December 31, 2016,2019, the estimated total remaining unamortized share-based compensation expense related to unvested restricted stock awards,RSAs, net of forfeitures, was $0.1$0.2 million which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 0.4 years. The total fair value of RSAs vested during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 was $1.9 million, $1.4 million and $2.2 million, respectively.

As of December 31, 2016, the estimated total2019, there was no remaining unamortized share-based compensation expense related to stock options, netoptions.



10. REVENUE RECOGNITION

Disaggregation of forfeitures,Revenue
The following reflects the disaggregation of revenue by primary geographic market, type of customer, product type, and timing of revenue recognition (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
 Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue Residential units revenue Land and lots revenue
Primary Geographical Market           
Central$396,900
 $31,080
 $281,868
 $40,184
 $224,670
 $17,928
Southeast362,930
 750
 297,025
 4,570
 214,850
 802
Total revenues$759,830
 $31,830
 $578,893
 $44,754
 $439,520
 $18,730
            
Type of Customer           
Homebuyers$759,830
 $185
 $578,893
 $670
 $439,520
 $
Homebuilders
 31,645
 
 44,084
 
 18,730
Total revenues$759,830
 $31,830
 $578,893
 $44,754
 $439,520
 $18,730
            
Product Type           
Residential units$759,830
 $
 $578,893
 $
 $439,520
 $
Land and lots
 31,830
 
 44,754
 
 18,730
Total revenues$759,830
 $31,830
 $578,893
 $44,754
 $439,520
 $18,730
            
Timing of Revenue Recognition           
Transferred at a point in time$752,273
 $31,830
 $571,177
 $44,754
 $435,644
 $18,730
Transferred over time7,557
 
 7,716
 
 3,876
 
Total revenues$759,830
 $31,830
 $578,893
 $44,754
 $439,520
 $18,730


Revenue recognized over time represents revenue from mechanic’s lien contracts.

Contract Balances

Opening and closing contract balances included in customer and builder deposits on the consolidated balance sheets are as follows (in thousands):
 
December 31, 2019
 December 31, 2018
Customer and builder deposits$23,954
 $31,978

The difference between the opening and closing balances of customer and builder deposits results from the timing difference between the customer’s payment of a deposit and the Company’s performance, impacted slightly by terminations of contracts. 

The amount of deposits on residential units and land and lots held as of the beginning of the period and recognized as revenue during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 are as follows (in thousands):
 2019 2018
Type of Customer   
Homebuyers$17,888
 $19,342
Homebuilders3,417
 1,806
Total deposits recognized as revenue$21,305
 $21,148




As a result of the GRBK GHO business combination, customer deposits from homebuyers in the amount of $9.1 million were acquired, of which $8.2 million was $0.8 millionrecognized during the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018.

Performance Obligations
There was 0 revenue recognized during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 from performance obligations satisfied in prior periods.

Transaction Price Allocated to Remaining Performance Obligations
The aggregate amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations on our land sale and lot option contracts is $50.4 million. The Company will recognize the remaining revenue when the lots are taken down, or upon closing for the sale of a land parcel, which is expected to be recognized overoccur as follows (in thousands):
2020$30,333
202118,940
20221,160
Total$50,433


The timing of lot takedowns is contingent upon a weighted-average periodnumber of 2.8 years.factors, including customer needs, the number of lots being purchased, receipt of acceptance of the plat by the municipality, weather-related delays, and agreed-upon lot takedown schedules.


Our contracts with homebuyers have a duration of less than one year. As such, the Company uses the practical expedient as allowed under ASC 606 and has not disclosed the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations as of the end of the reporting period.

8.11. SEGMENT INFORMATION

The Company has three reportable segments - Builder operations Central, Builder operations Southeast, and Land development. Builder operations Central represents operations of our builders in Texas, whereas Builder operations Southeast represents operations of our builders in Georgia and Florida.

The operations of the Company’s builders were aggregated in these three reportable segments based on similar economic characteristics, including geography, housing products, class of homebuyer, regulatory environments, and methods used to construct and sell homes. The Company believes such presentation is consistent with the objective and basic principles of ASC 280 and provides the most meaningful information about the types of business activities in which the Company engages and the economic environments in which it operates.

Corporate operations are reported as a non-operating segment and include activities which support the Company’s builder operations, land development, title and mortgage operations through centralization of certain administrative functions, such as finance, treasury, information technology and human resources, as well as development of strategic initiatives. Unallocated corporate expenses are reported in the corporate, other and unallocated segment as these activities do not share a majority of aggregation criteria with either the builder operations or land development segments.

While the operations of Challenger meet the criteria for an operating segment, they do not meet the quantitative thresholds of ASC 280 to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, Challenger’s results are included within the corporate, other and unallocated segment.

Green Brick Title, LLC (“Green Brick Title”), Providence Title and Green Brick Mortgage operations are not economically similar to either builder operations or land development and do not meet the quantitative thresholds of ASC 280 to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, these entities’ results are included within the corporate, other and unallocated segment.

Operations of EJB River Holdings do not meet the criteria for an operating segment, and they do not meet the quantitative thresholds of ASC 280 to be separately reported and disclosed. As such, EJB River Holdings’ results are included within the corporate, other and unallocated segment.



Segment information for the year ended December 31, 2017 has been restated to conform with the revised segment presentation for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Financial information relating to the Company’s reportable segments is as follows. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent, stand-alone entity during the periods presented.
 Years Ended December 31,
(in thousands)2019 2018 2017
Revenues: (1)
     
Builder operations     
Central$396,900
 $282,218
 $224,670
Southeast363,680
 301,595
 214,850
Total builder operations760,580
 583,813
 439,520
Land development31,080
 39,834
 18,730
Total revenues$791,660
 $623,647
 $458,250
      
Gross profit:     
Builder operations    

Central$88,480
 $75,006
 $64,427
Southeast92,088
 82,935
 57,820
Total builder operations180,568
 157,941
 122,247
Land development8,050
 9,334
 5,506
Corporate, other and unallocated (2)
(19,536) (13,073) (9,293)
Total gross profit$169,082
 $154,202
 $118,460
      
Interest expense: (3)
     
Builder operations     
Central$24,072
 $18,207
 $11,623
Southeast15,686
 12,795
 14,141
Total builder operations39,758
 31,002
 25,764
Corporate, other and unallocated(39,758) (31,002) (25,764)
Total interest expense$
 $
 $
      
Income before income taxes:     
Builder operations     
Central$36,569
 $37,535
 $36,224
Southeast47,210
 47,237
 34,636
Total builder operations83,779
 84,772
 70,860
Land development10,759
 6,155
 4,320
Corporate, other and unallocated (4)
(10,209) (9,256) (10,943)
Income before income taxes$84,329
 $81,671
 $64,237


(in thousands)
December 31, 2019
 December 31, 2018
Inventory:   
Builder operations   
Central$251,677
 $160,980
Southeast168,140
 159,616
Total builder operations419,817
 320,596
Land development308,071
 329,105
Corporate, other and unallocated (5)
25,679
 19,260
Total inventory$753,567
 $668,961
    
Goodwill: (6)
   
Builder operations - Southeast$680
 $680


(1)
The sum of Builder operations Central and Southeast segments’ revenues does not equal residential units revenue included in the consolidated statements of income in periods when our builders have revenues from land or lot closings, which for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017 were $0.8 million, $4.9 million and $0.0 million, respectively.
(2)Corporate, other and unallocated gross loss is comprised of capitalized overhead and capitalized interest adjustments that are not allocated to builder operations and land development segments.
(3)Interest expense of Builder operations Central and Southeast segments represents an interest expense charged by Corporate, other and unallocated segment in relation to financing purchases of land and construction of some of the Company’s Dallas and Atlanta builders. Intercompany interest revenue of the Corporate, other and unallocated segment is eliminated in consolidation.
(4)Corporate, other and unallocated loss before income taxes includes results from Green Brick Title, Challenger, Green Brick Mortgage, EJB River Holdings, and Providence Title.
(5)Corporate, other and unallocated inventory consists of capitalized overhead and interest related to work in process and land under development.
(6)In connection with the GRBK GHO business combination, the Company recorded goodwill of $0.7 million.

12. INCOME TAXES

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “Tax Act”). The Tax Act made major changes to the Internal Revenue Code. The Company recognized the income tax effects of the Tax Act in its financial statements in accordance with Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 which provides SEC staff guidance for the application of ASC 740, Income Taxes. The Company finalized its accounting for the income tax effects of the Tax Act in the fourth quarter of 2018 with no adjustments recorded during the measurement period.



Income Tax Expense
The components of current and deferred income tax expense are as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Current income tax expense (benefit):     
Federal$15,980
 $(569) $999
State2,810
 2,993
 1,733
Total current income tax expense18,790
 2,424
 2,732
Deferred income tax expense (benefit):     
Federal774
 15,023
 36,569
State463
 (311) (270)
Total deferred income tax expense1,237
 14,712
 36,299
Total income tax expense$20,027
 $17,136
 $39,031


Effective Income Tax Rate Reconciliation

The income tax expense differs from the amount that would be computed by applying the statutory federal income tax rates of 21%, 21% and 35% for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively, to income before income taxes as a result of the following (amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Tax on pre-tax book income (before reduction of noncontrolling interests)$17,709
 $17,151
 $22,483
Tax effect of non-controlled earnings(1,252) (2,743) (3,630)
State income tax expense, net of federal benefit2,706
 1,940
 931
Adjustments to deferred tax assets related to state net operating losses1,063
 283
 41
Change in valuation allowance(1,063) (283) (41)
Change in federal statutory tax rate
 
 19,017
Other864
 788
 230
Total income tax expense$20,027
 $17,136
 $39,031
Effective income tax rate23.7% 21.0% 60.8%


The effective income tax rate for 2017 reflects the impact of compliance with the Tax Act, signed into law on December 22, 2017. The Company remeasured its deferred tax assets due to the change in federal statutory tax rate which resulted in additional tax expense of $19.0 million.



Deferred Income Taxes

The primary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
 December 31, 2019 December 31, 2018
Deferred tax assets:   
Basis in partnerships$9,212
 $10,947
Accrued expenses2,206
 2,182
Inventory2,316
 1,521
Change in fair value of contingent consideration1,444
 385
Lease liabilities - operating leases832
 
State net operating loss carryover
 1,063
Federal net operating loss carryover
 432
Alternative minimum tax credit carryover
 576
Stock-based compensation408
 347
Other191
 175
Deferred tax assets, gross16,609
 17,628
Valuation allowance
 (1,063)
Deferred tax assets, net$16,609
 $16,565
    
Deferred tax liabilities:   
Right-of-use assets - operating leases$(818) $
Prepaid insurance(419) (66)
Other(110) 
Deferred tax liabilities$(1,347) $(66)
Total deferred income tax assets, net$15,262
 $16,499


Net Operating Losses and Valuation Allowances
As of December 31, 2019, all federal net operating loss carryforwards were fully utilized.

During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company decided to write off its gross state net operating loss carryforwards in Minnesota of $13.7 million, as well as the related deferred tax asset and valuation allowance. Management believes on a more-likely-than-not basis that the Minnesota net operating loss carryforwards would not have been utilized.

The rollforward of valuation allowance is as follows (amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018
Valuation allowance at beginning of the year$1,063
 $1,346
Write-off of state net operating losses(1,063) 
Expiration of state net operating losses
 (283)
Valuation allowance at end of the year$
 $1,063


Uncertain Tax Positions
The Company establishes accruals for uncertain tax positions that reflect management’s best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more-likely-than-not basis. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions have a more-likely-than-not chance of being sustained by the Company. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is considered greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. There were no uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019.



A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of uncertain tax positions for the year ended December 31, 2017 is as follows (in thousands):
 Year Ended December 31, 2017
Uncertain tax positions at beginning of year$249
Change related to Georgia state income taxes(249)
Uncertain tax positions at end of year$


There were no expenses for interest and penalties related to uncertain tax positions for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018, and 2017. There were no accrued liabilities related to uncertain tax positions as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

Statutes of Limitations
The U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for our 2016 and subsequent tax years. Due to the carryover of the federal net operating losses for years 2009 and forward, income tax returns going back to the 2009 tax year are subject to adjustment.

The Colorado and Minnesota statutes of limitations remain open for our 2015 and subsequent tax years. The Nebraska statute of limitations remains open for our 2016 and subsequent tax years.

The Company’s subsidiaries file returns in Texas, Georgia and Florida.

The Texas statute of limitations remains open for the 2015 and subsequent tax years. Any Texas adjustments relating to returns filed by the subsidiary partnerships would be borne by the subsidiary partnership entities.

The Georgia statute of limitations remains open for the 2016 and subsequent tax years. Any Georgia adjustments relating to returns filed by the subsidiary partnerships would be borne by the partner.

The Florida statute of limitations will remain open for the 2018 and subsequent tax years. Any Florida adjustments relating to returns filed by the subsidiary partnerships would be borne by the partner.

The Company is not presently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service or state tax authority.

13. EMPLOYEE BENEFITS


Prior to 2015, we hadWe have a qualifying 401(k) defined contribution plan that covered employees at one of our subsidiaries, The Providence Group LLC (“TPG”). During the year ended December 31, 2015, we extended the qualifying 401(k) defined contribution plan tocovers all employees of the Company. Each year, we may make discretionary matching contributions equal to a percentage of the employees'employees’ contributions. The Company did not contribute anycontributed $0.8 million, $0.6 million and $0.5 million of matching contributions to the 401(k) plan during the years ended December 31, 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014.2017.


9.14. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The Company’s restricted stock awards have the right to receive forfeitable dividends on an equal basis with common stock and therefore are not considered participating securities that must be included in the calculation of net income per share using the two-class method. Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during each period, adjusted for non-vested shares of restricted stock awards during each period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated using the treasury stock method and includes the effect of all dilutive securities, including stock options and restricted stock awards.



The computation of basic and diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
      
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc.$58,656
 $51,623
 $14,970
      
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic50,530
 50,652
 49,597
Basic net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share$1.16
 $1.02
 $0.30
      
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - basic50,530
 50,652
 49,597
Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock awards106
 99
 86
Weighted-average number of shares outstanding - diluted50,636
 50,751
 49,683
Diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per share$1.16
 $1.02
 $0.30


The following shares that could potentially dilute earnings per share in the future are not included in the determination of diluted net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2019 2018 2017
Antidilutive options to purchase common stock and restricted stock awards14
 8
 


15. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments, none of which are held for trading purposes, include cash, restricted cash, receivables, earnest money deposits, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, customer and builder deposits, borrowings on lines of credit, senior unsecured notes, and contingent consideration liability.

Per the fair value hierarchy, level 1 financial instruments include: cash, restricted cash, receivables, earnest money deposits, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and customer and builder deposits due to their short-term nature. The Company estimates that, due to the short-term nature of the underlying financial instruments or the proximity of the underlying transaction to the applicable reporting date, the fair value of level 1 financial instruments does not differ materially from the aggregate carrying values recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Level 2 financial instruments include borrowings on lines of credit and senior unsecured notes. Due to the short-term nature and floating interest rate terms, the carrying amounts of borrowings on lines of credit are deemed to approximate fair value. The estimated fair value of the senior unsecured notes as of December 31, 2019 was $78.6 million.

The fair value of the contingent consideration liability related to the GRBK GHO business combination was estimated using an internally developed discounted cash flow analysis. As the measurement of the contingent consideration is based primarily on significant inputs not observable in the market, it represents a level 3 measurement.

Key inputs in measuring the fair value of the contingent consideration liability are management’s projections of GRBK GHO’s net income and debt, and the annual discount rate of 16.5% that reflects the risk associated with achieving the milestones of the contingent consideration payments.



The reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for level 3 measurements is as follows (in thousands):
 Carrying Value Estimated Fair Value
Contingent consideration liability, balance as of December 31, 2018$2,207
 $2,207
Payment of contingent consideration(514) (514)
Payment of contingent consideration in excess of acquisition date fair value(1,332) (1,332)
Change in fair value of contingent consideration4,906
 4,906
Contingent consideration liability, balance as of December 31, 2019$5,267
 $5,267


There were no transfers between the levels of the fair value hierarchy for any of our financial instruments as of December 31, 2019 when compared to December 31, 2018.

Fair Value of Nonfinancial Instruments
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities include inventory which is measured at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected instrument is written down to fair value. Per the fair value hierarchy, these items are level 3 nonfinancial instruments. For additional information on the Company’s inventory, refer to Note 4.

16. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS


During 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 2014,2017, the Company had the following related party transactions through the normal course of business. These transactions include the following:


Through November 2014, the Company leased its Dallas, Texas headquarters on a month-to-month basis from family members of the Company's Chief Executive Officer. The Company terminated this lease during the fourth quarter of 2014. During 2014, the Company paid rent of $13,913 under this agreement which is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income.Parc at Cogburn

Through the Transaction Date, the Company paid a quarterly management fee to an executive calculated at .375% of cumulative capital contributions of certain members of Builder Finance at the end of each quarter. During 2014, the Company incurred $1.3 million of expenses from this arrangement which are included as management fees in the consolidated statements of income.

On October 27, 2014, in connection with the Transaction, the Company entered into a Loan Agreement, a guaranty and a pledge and security agreement with certain funds and accounts managed by Greenlight, our largest shareholder. Greenlight beneficially owns approximately 49.3% of the voting power of the Company. The Loan Agreement provides for a five year term loan facility in an aggregate principal amount of $150.0 million which funded part of the Transaction. Certain subsidiaries of the Company guarantee obligations under the Term Loan Facility pursuant to the guaranty. The Term Loan Facility bore interest at 9.0% per annum, payable quarterly, from October 27, 2014 through the first anniversary thereof and 10.0% per annum thereafter. On July 1, 2015 we used approximately $154.9 million of the net proceeds from the Equity Offering to repay all of the outstanding principal, interest and a prepayment premium under the Term Loan Facility. See Note 1 for further discussion of this repayment.

In 2012, we formed Centre Living Homes, LLC (“Centre Living”), a builder that focuses on a limited number of homes and luxury townhomes each year in the Dallas, Texas market. Trevor Brickman, the son of Green Brick's Chief Executive Officer, is the President of Centre Living. Effective as of January 1, 2015, Centre Living's operating agreement was amended and restated to the same general terms as with our other builders, such that Green Brick's ownership interest in Centre Living is 50% and Trevor Brickman's ownership interest is 50% for future operations beginning January 1, 2015. Subsequent to this


amendment, Green Brick has 51% voting control over the operations of Centre Living. As such, 100% of Centre Living's operations are included within our consolidated financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2016, December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The noncontrolling interest attributable to Centre Living was $0.3 million and 0.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively. In June 2016, the Company sold one developed lot to Trevor Brickman for $0.4 million, of which $0.3 million was included in the cost of land and lots. In September 2016, Trevor Brickman entered into an agreement with Centre Living to construct a home on the developed lot. In accordance with the Company's employee discount policy, the contract price is construction costs plus a 13% premium. As of December 31, 2016, the Company has incurred $0.2 million in costs to construct the home. As of December 31, 2016, the Company had $0.1 million in accounts receivables due from Trevor Brickman related to the construction of the home.


In September 2015, the Company purchased 11 lots from an entity affiliated with the president of TPG, one of its controlled builders. The lots are part of a 19-home community, The Parc at Cogburn in Atlanta. The total paid for the lots in 2015 was $1.8 million. Under the option agreementcontract in place, the Company purchased $0.3 million in lots during the year ended December 31, 2016, and has another $1.0 million in lots that it expects to purchase prior to Septemberduring the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company purchased all 19 lots as of December 31, 2017.


Academy Street

In November 2015, the Company purchased 12 lots from an entity affiliated with the president of TPG, one of its controlled builders. The lots are part of a 92-unit townhome community, Glens at Sugarloaf in Atlanta. No deposits were paid by the Company in contracting for the lots. The total paid for the lots in 2015 was $1.0 million. During March 2016, the Company purchased the remaining 80 townhome lots within the community at a price of $4.8 million from the affiliated entity.

During March 2016, the Company purchased undeveloped land for an eventual 83 lot83-lot community, Academy Street in Atlanta. Simultaneously, the Company entered into a partnership agreement with an entity affiliated with the president of TPG to develop the communityland for sale of the lots to TPG under GRBK Academy LLC.TPG. Contributions and profits will beare shared 80% forby the Company and 20% forby the affiliated entity.

During the year ended December 31, 2017, TPG purchased 62 lots within the community for $11.2 million. During the year ended December 31, 2018, TPG purchased the remaining 21 lots within the community for $2.9 million.

Total capital contributions are estimated at $11.8 million,as of which $9.4 million will be contributed by the Company. The totalDecember 31, 2019 were $11.7 million. Total capital contributions paid induring the year ended December 31, 2016 waswere $11.2 million, of which $9.0 million was paid by the Company. Total capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $0.5 million, of which $0.4 million was paid by the Company. There were 0 capital contributions made to the partnership during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Total capital distributions as of December 31, 2019 were $14.8 million. There were 0 capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2016. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $11.5 million, of which $9.2 million was paid to the Company. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2018 were $3.3 million, of which $2.7 million was paid to the Company. The capital distributions made during the year ended December 31, 2018 were final, and the affiliated entity has ceased its activity.

The Company has 80% ownership in Green Brick Academy, LLC and has consolidated the entity.entity’s results of operations and financial condition into its consolidated financial statements based on its 80% ownership.


During


Suwanee Station

In March 2016, the Company purchased undeveloped land for an eventuala 73-unit townhome community, Suwanee Station in Atlanta. Simultaneously, the Company entered into a partnership agreement with an entity affiliated with the president of TPG to develop the communityland for sale of the lots to TPG under GRBK Suwanee Station LLC.TPG. Contributions and profits will beare shared 50% forby the Company and 50% forby the affiliated entity.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, TPG purchased 13, 25, and 27 lots within the community for $0.5 million, $1.3 million and $1.6 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, there were no lots remaining to be sold to TPG.

Total capital contributions are estimated at $2.0 million,as of which $1.0 million will be contributed by the Company. The totalDecember 31, 2019 were $2.5 million. Total capital contributions paid induring the year ended December 31, 2016 waswere $1.8 million, of which $0.9 million was paid by the Company. The capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $0.7 million, of which $0.4 million was paid by the Company. The were no capital contributions paid during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.

Total capital distributions as of December 31, 2019 were $3.3 million. There were no capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2016. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2017 were $1.5 million, of which $0.7 million was paid to the Company. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2018 were $0.9 million, of which $0.4 million was paid to the Company. Total capital distributions from the partnership during the year ended December 31, 2019 were $0.9 million, of which $0.5 million was paid to the Company. The capital distributions made during the year ended December 31, 2019 were final, and the affiliated entity has ceased its activity.

The Company holds two2 of the three3 board seats and is able to exercise control over the operations of GRBK Suwanee Station LLC,the partnership and therefore has consolidated the entity. GRBK Suwanee Station LLC had $0.4 million in revenues during the year ended December 31, 2016.entity’s results of operations and financial condition into its consolidated financial statements.


Dunwoody Towneship

In June 2016, the Company purchased 14 lots from an entity affiliated with the president of TPG. The lots are part of a 40-unit townhome community, Dunwoody Towneship. No deposits were paid by the Company related to these lots.Towneship in Atlanta. The total paid for the 14 lots in 2016 was $1.8 million. The total that would be expected to be paid forCompany purchased the remaining 26 lots would be $1.8 million during 2017 and $1.7 million during 2018.



10. INCOME TAXES

Provision for Income Taxes
The components of income before income taxes attributable to our operations are as follows (in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Current:     
Federal$158
 $
 $
State2,076
 819
 485
Total current2,234
 819
 485
Deferred     
Federal13,146
 8,412
 (23,308)
State1
 (60) (2,030)
Total deferred13,147
 8,352
 (25,338)
Total income tax provision (benefit)$15,381
 $9,171
 $(24,853)

Deferred Income Taxes
The primary differences between the financial statement and tax bases of assets and liabilities are as follows (in thousands):
 December 31, 2016 December 31, 2015
Deferred tax assets:   
Accrued bonuses$1,120
 $39
Accrued payroll101
 49
Stock-based compensation291
 125
Federal net operating loss carryover40,800
 55,622
State net operating loss carryover1,147
 1,161
Basis in partnerships22,922
 24,773
Warranty accrual444
 166
Inventory (Section 263A)945
 
Accrued job costs503
 
Reserve to complete345
 
 Alternative minimum tax credit carryover158
 
Other126
 40
 68,902
 81,975
Valuation allowance(1,147) (1,161)
Deferred tax assets, net$67,755
 $80,814
    
Deferred tax liabilities:  
   
Prepaid insurance$(43) $(34)
Noncontrolling interests impact of M-1s
 (117)
Other(114) 
Deferred tax liabilities, net$(157) $(151)

The Company assesses the recoverability of deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance on an ongoing basis. In making this assessment, management considers all available positive and negative evidence and available income tax planning to determine whether it is more-likely-than-not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will be realized in future periods. This assessment requires significant judgment and estimates involving current and deferred income taxes, tax


attributes relating to the interpretation of various tax laws, historical bases of tax attributes associated with certain assets and limitations surrounding the realization of deferred tax assets.

The Company files a federal corporate income tax return. The operations of JBGL subsequent to the Transaction Date was included in the Company’s federal income tax filing.

As of December 31, 2016, the federal net operating loss carryforward was approximately $116.6 million, which will begin to expire beginning with the year ending December 31, 2029. The U.S. federal statute of limitations remains open for our 2013 and subsequent tax years. Due to the carryover of the federal net operating losses for years 2008 and forward, income tax returns going back to the 2008 year are subject to adjustment. The Colorado and Minnesota statute of limitations remains open for our 2012 and subsequent tax years. The Nebraska statute of limitations remains open for our 2013 and subsequent tax years. Additionally, JBGL's partnerships filed returns in Texas and Georgia. The Georgia statute of limitations remains open for the 2013 and subsequent tax years. Any Georgia adjustments relating to returns filed by the partnerships would be borne by the partners. The Texas statute of limitations remains open for the 2012 and subsequent tax years.

The Company is not presently under examination by the Internal Revenue Service, nor has it been contacted.

Effective Tax rate Reconciliation
A reconciliation between our effective tax rate on income before income tax provision (benefit) and the U.S. federal statutory rate is as follows (amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015 2014
Tax on pre-tax book income (before reduction for noncontrolling interests)$17,693
 $12,151
 $12,673
Pre-Transaction earnings taxed to partners
 
 (10,634)
Tax effect of non-controlled earnings post Transaction(3,996) (3,577) (644)
Change in partnership tax status
 
 (25,244)
Change in partnership tax status - state benefit
 
 (1,320)
State tax expense, net1,153
 533
 315
Deferred other
 (36) 
Other531
 100
 1
Total tax expense$15,381
 $9,171
 $(24,853)
 30.4% 26.4% (68.6)%

Net Operating Losses and Valuation Allowances
As of December 31, 2016, we have $116.6 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards that will expire beginning with the year ending in December 31, 2029. Our ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards depends on the amount of taxable income we generate in future periods. Based on our 2016, 2015 and 2014 taxable income results and projections of taxable income, management expects that the Company will generate sufficient taxable income to utilize substantially all of the federal net operating loss carryforwards before they expire. We also have approximately $21.3 million of state net operating loss carryforwards that have varying dates of expiration. We believe it is more-likely-than-not that the state loss carryforwards will expire prior to their utilization. As a result, a $21.3 million valuation allowance is recorded against the state loss carryforwards in full. The assessment of the need for a valuation allowance considered all available positive and negative information and available tax planning.

Prior to the Transaction Date, JBGL was not a taxable entity for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Taxes on its net income were borne by its members through the allocation of taxable income. Upon completion of the reverse recapitalization of Green Brick, JBGL became part of a consolidated taxable entity. The Transaction resulted in the change of JBGL’s tax status that resulted in the recognition of a one-time income tax benefit in the income statement of approximately $26.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2014.2017 for $3.3 million.


BioFuel had approximately $182.3Corporate Officers

In February 2017, Richard A. Costello paid a $0.1 million of federal net operating loss carryforwards and approximately $21.6 million of state net operating loss carryforwards asdeposit to Centre Living Homes, LLC, one of the Transaction Date. The Company re-assessed the need for a valuation allowance as of the Transaction Date and concluded,Company’s builders, on a more-likely-than-not basis, thattownhome. During the deferred income tax assets, exceptfourth quarter of 2017, Mr. Costello closed on the townhome for the


state loss carryforwards, would be realized, giving consideration to the historical, current year and projected operating results of JBGL. As a result of the re-assessment, the Company recorded $63.9 million of net deferred income tax assets at the Transaction Date, with an offset in additional paid-in-capital. The effect of the re-assessment had no impact on income tax expense.

The rollforward of valuation allowances is as follows (amounts in thousands):
 Years Ended December 31,
 2016 2015
Valuation allowance at beginning of the year$1,161
 $1,161
Expiration to state net operating losses(14) 
Valuation allowance at end of the year$1,147
 $1,161

Uncertain Tax Positions
The company establishes reserves for uncertain tax positions that reflect its best estimate of deductions and credits that may not be sustained on a more-likely-than-not basis.approximately $0.5 million. In accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes, the Company recognizesCompany’s employee discount policy, the effectcontract price resulted in a margin of income tax positions only if those positions haveapproximately 13%.

In February 2017, Jed Dolson paid a more-likely-than-not chance$0.1 million deposit to Centre Living on a townhome. During the fourth quarter of being sustained by the Company. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected2017, as allowed for in the period in whichCompany’s employee discount policy, Mr. Dolson assigned his rights to purchase the change in judgment occurs. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of total uncertain tax positions is as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of December 31, 2015$
Increase related to Georgia state income tax249
Balance as of December 31, 2016$249

townhome to his sister-in-law. The interest and penalties expense reflectedtownhome was closed on in the consolidated statementsfourth quarter of income2017 for approximately $0.5 million. In accordance with the years endedCompany’s employee discount policy, the contract price resulted in a margin of approximately 13%.

Trevor Brickman, the son of Green Brick’s Chief Executive Officer, is the President of Centre Living. Following a series of transactions described in Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and in Note 3, effective December 31, 2016, 20152019, Green Brick’s ownership interest in Centre Living is 90% and 2014 was nil, $0Trevor Brickman’s ownership interest is 10%. Green Brick has 90% voting control over the operations of Centre Living. As such, 100% of Centre Living’s operations are included within our consolidated financial statements.

GRBK GHO
GRBK GHO leases office space from entities affiliated with the president of GRBK GHO. During the year ended December 31, 2019 and $0 respectively. The corresponding liabilities in accrued expensesduring the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018, GRBK GHO incurred a lease cost of $0.1 million and $0.1 million, respectively, under such lease agreements. As of December 31, 2019, there were 0 amounts due to the affiliated entities related to such lease agreements.


GRBK GHO receives title closing services on the consolidated balance sheets was nilpurchase of land and $0 asthird-party lots from an entity affiliated with the president of GRBK GHO. During the year ended December 31, 20162019 and 2015, respectively.during the period from April 26, 2018 through December 31, 2018, GRBK GHO incurred de minimus fees related to such title closing services. As of December 31, 2019, no amounts were due to the title company affiliate.


11. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The Company’s financial instruments, none of which are held for trading purposes, include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, earnest money deposits, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, customer and builder deposits, obligations related to land not owned under option agreements, borrowings on lines of credit, and notes payable. Per the fair value hierarchy, level 1 financial instruments include: cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivables, earnest money deposits, other assets, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and customer and builder deposits due to their short term nature. Level 2 financial instruments include: borrowings on lines of credit and notes payable. All other instruments are deemed to be level 3.

Due to the short-term nature, the carrying amounts of notes payable and borrowings on lines of credit approximates fair value. Furthermore, borrowings on lines of credit include floating interest rate terms. The fair value of obligations related to land not owned under option agreements is primarily determined by discounting the estimated future cash flow of each community using various unobservable inputs in our impairment analysis.

The Company estimates that due to the short term nature of the underlying financial instruments or the proximity of the underlying transaction to the applicable reporting date that the fair value of all financial instruments does not differ materially from the aggregate carrying values recorded in the consolidated financial statements as of December 31, 2016 and 2015.

Fair Value of Nonfinancial Instruments
Nonfinancial assets and liabilities include items such as inventory and long lived assets that are measured at cost unless the carrying value is determined to be not recoverable in which case the affected instrument is written down to fair value. The fair value of inventory is primarily determined by discounting the estimated future cash flow of each community using various unobservable inputs in our impairment analysis. Per the fair value hierarchy, inventory and long lived assets are level 3


nonfinancial instruments. During the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the Company did not record any fair value adjustments to those nonfinancial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.

12.17. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES


Letters of Credit and Performance Bonds
During the ordinary course of business, certain regulatory agencies and municipalities require the Company to post letters of credit or performance bonds related to development projects. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, letters of credit outstanding were $9.0 million and $2.2 million, respectively, and performance bonds outstanding totaled $5.4 million and $5.3 million, respectively. The Company does not believe that it is likely that any material claims will be made under a letter of credit or performance bond in the foreseeable future.

Warranties
Warranty activity, included in accrued expenses in our consolidated balance sheets, for 2016, 20152019, 2018 and 20142017 consists of the following (in thousands):
 2016 2015 2014
Beginning balance$474
 $460
 $328
Additions1,399
 667
 388
Charges(663) (653) (256)
Ending balance$1,210
 $474
 $460
 2019 2018 2017
Warranty accrual, beginning of period$2,980
 $2,083
 $1,210
Warranties issued3,358
 2,384
 1,454
Changes in liability for existing warranties37
 163
 482
Settlements(2,535) (1,650) (1,063)
Warranty accrual, end of period$3,840
 $2,980
 $2,083


CommitmentsOperating Leases
Prior to 2015, the Company had a month to month lease with a related party (See Note 9). The Company also has leases associated with office and design center space in Georgia, Texas, and Texas whichFlorida that, at the commencement date, have a lease term of more than 12 months and are classified as operating leases. RentThe exercise of any extension options available in such operating lease contracts is not reasonably certain.
Operating lease cost of $1.3 million for these leases for the year ended December 31, 2019 is included in selling, general and administrative expense underin the consolidated statements of income. For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $1.2 million.
Rental expense for these leases totaled $0.7 million, $0.6$1.2 million and $0.5$0.9 million in 2016, 2015for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2014,2017, respectively, and arewas included in the selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income.

As of December 31, 2019, the weighted-average remaining lease term and the weighted-average discount rate used in calculating our lease liabilities were 3.3 years and 5.22%, respectively.
The approximatefuture annual minimum lease payments over the next five years underundiscounted cash flows in relation to the operating leases and a reconciliation of such undiscounted cash flows to the operating lease liabilities recognized in the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 20162019 are presented below (in thousands):

2020$1,320
20211,096
2022819
20231,218
202414
Total future lease payments$4,467
Less: Interest$903
Present value of lease liabilities$3,564


The Company elected the short-term lease recognition exemption for all leases that, at the commencement date, have a lease term of 12 months or less and do not include an option to purchase the underlying asset that the Company is reasonably certain to exercise. For such leases, the Company does not recognize ROU assets or lease liabilities and instead recognizes lease

2017$770
2018786
2019803
2020808
2021 and thereafter458
 $3,625


payments in the consolidated income statements on a straight-line basis. Short-term lease cost of $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 related to such lease contracts is included in selling, general and administrative expense in the consolidated statements of income.

Legal Matters
Lawsuits, claims and proceedings may be instituted or asserted against us in the normal course of business. The Company is also subject to local, state and federal laws and regulations related to land development activities, house construction standards, sales practices, title company regulations, employment practices and environmental protection. As a result, the Company may be subject to periodic examinations or inquiry by agencies administering these laws and regulations.


The Company records a reservean accrual for potential legal claims and regulatory matters when they are probable of occurring and a potential loss is reasonably estimable. The Company accrues for these matters based on facts and circumstances specific to each matter and revises these estimates when necessary.


In view of the inherent difficulty of predicting outcomes of legal claims and related contingencies, the Company generally cannot predict their ultimate resolution, related timing or eventual loss. If evaluations indicate loss contingencies that could be material are not probable, but are reasonably possible, the Company will disclose their nature with an estimate of the possible range of losses or a statement that such loss is not reasonably estimable. We believe that the disposition of legal claims and related contingencies will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and liquidity or on our financial condition.


18. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

In February 2020, the Company and the minority partner of GRBK GHO amended the operating agreement of GRBK GHO to change the start of the put and purchase options described in Note 2 from April 2021 to April 2024. The Company is currently evaluating the accounting for this change on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company has established disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and, as such, is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including our Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management, together with our CEO and CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2019. Based on our evaluation, the CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2019.

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
The Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with GAAP. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including the CEO and CFO, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019 based upon Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.




13. SEGMENT INFORMATIONBased on this evaluation, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.


Financial information relating toRSM US LLP, the Company’s reportable segments was as follows. Operational results of each reportable segment are not necessarily indicative of the results that would have been achieved had the reportable segment been an independent stand-alone entity during the periods presented. Our segments generally follow the sameregistered public accounting policies used forfirm, has audited our consolidated financial statements included in this report and has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting, which is included herein.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2019, there were no changes in our internal controls that have materially affected or are reasonably likely to have a material effect on our internal control over financial reporting.


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Green Brick Partners, Inc.


Opinion on the Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
We have audited Green Brick Partners, Inc. and subsidiaries' (the Company) internal control over financial reporting as described in Note 2. Evaluation of segment performance is primarilyDecember 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013. In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in 2013.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements of the Company and our report dated March 6, 2020 expressed an unqualified opinion.

Basis for Opinion
The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a combinationpublic accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of revenues, gross profit, income before taxesthe Securities and inventory.Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 Years End December 31,
(in thousands)2016 2015 2014
Revenues:(1)(2)
     
Builder Operations     
Texas$201,473
 $121,979
 $83,625
Georgia163,942
 132,288
 116,692
Corporate and Other(3)

 
 
Land Development14,913
 36,878
 45,785
 $380,328
 $291,145
 $246,102
Gross profit:(1)(4)
     
Builder Operations    

Texas$50,320
 $29,992
 $19,383
Georgia37,114
 31,733
 32,950
Corporate and Other(3)
(5,659) (9,108) (3,989)
Land Development4,600
 9,635
 9,877
 $86,375
 $62,252
 $58,221
Income before taxes(4)
  
   
   
Builder Operations     
Texas$34,939
 $19,945
 $10,889
Georgia24,639
 21,744
 24,688
Corporate and Other(3)
(12,635) (12,091) (632)
Land Development3,611
 5,118
 1,264
 $50,554
 $34,716
 $36,209
Inventory:     
Builder Operations     
Texas$76,878
 $61,403
 $42,665
Georgia90,859
 86,707
 55,747
Corporate and Other(3)
9,834
 7,869
 2,631
Land Development232,726
 188,153
 174,098
 $410,297
 $344,132
 $275,141
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

(1)The Builder Operations segment revenues is not equal to the sale of residential units included in the consolidated statements of income. The difference is due to sale of land and lots operations related to controlled builders which are reported within the Builder Operations segment versus Land Development. The Land Development segment includes sale of land and lots operations related to the acquisition and development of land which is sold to the Company’s controlled builders and third-party homebuilders. Therefore, the gross profit on the sale of land and lots related to controlled builders is reported within the Builder Operations segment.
(2)
Due to the change in our segments, as discussed in Note 2, we moved (i) $0.3 million in revenues from our Builder Operations segment to our Land Development segment during the year ended December 31, 2014, (ii) $0.1 million and $1.5 million in gross profit from our Land Development segment to our Builder Operations segment during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and (iii) $63.4 million and $73.9 million in inventory from our Builder Operations segment to our Land Development segment during the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively.
TABLE OF CONTENTSDefinition and Limitations of Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company's assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.


(3)Corporate and Other is comprised principally of general corporate expenses associated with administrative functions such as finance, treasury, information technology and human resources, and results from Title.
(4)Certain indirect project costs previously classified as salary expense and selling, general and administrative expense have been classified as cost of residential units for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 to properly present cost of residential units, salary expense, and selling, general and administrative expense. Therefore, amounts presented differ from the amounts previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015. See Note 2 for further discussion on this change in classification.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ RSM US LLP

Dallas, Texas
March 6, 2020

14. QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

Summarized unaudited quarterly results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Year ended December 31, 2016 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
Revenues $69,958
 $98,936
 $91,670
 $119,764
Gross profit(1)
 14,414
 22,116
 20,644
 29,201
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. 3,094
 6,743
 6,243
 7,676
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:        
Basic $0.06 $0.14 $0.13 $0.16
Diluted $0.06 $0.14 $0.13 $0.16
Year ended December 31, 2015 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
Revenues $58,452
 $71,987
 $75,198
 $85,508
Gross profit(1)
 15,039
 15,922
 14,387
 16,904
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. 4,018
 3,788
 2,826
 4,693
Net income attributable to Green Brick Partners, Inc. per common share:(2)
        
Basic $0.13 $0.12 $0.06 $0.10
Diluted $0.13 $0.12 $0.06 $0.10
(1)Certain indirect project costs previously classified as salary expense and selling, general and administrative expense have been classified as cost of residential units for the years ended December 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 to properly present cost of residential units, salary expense, and selling, general and administrative expense. Therefore, the amounts presented differ from the amounts previously reported in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and our Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the first, second and third quarters of 2016. See Note 2 for further discussion on this change in classification.
(2)Per share amounts for the four quarters do not add to per share amounts for the year due to rounding differences in quarterly amounts and due to the impact of differences between the quarterly and annual weighted average share calculations.





(a)ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by Part III, Item 10, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s proxy statement for its 2020 annual meeting of shareholders (“Proxy Statement”) to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by Part III, Item 11, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by Part III, Item 12, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information required by Part III, Item 13, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information required by Part III, Item 14, is incorporated herein by reference to the Company’s Proxy Statement to be filed with the SEC no later than 120 days after the end of the Company’s fiscal year.



PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Financial Statements

See Part II, Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

Financial statements schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable or the required information is included in the consolidated financial statements or notes thereto.

(3) Exhibits


EXHIBITS INDEXThe following exhibits are filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K or are incorporated herein by reference:
Number Description
2.1#Transaction Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2014, by and among BioFuel Energy Corp., JBGL Capital L.P., JBGL Exchange (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Willow Crest (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Hawthorne (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Inwood (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Chateau (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Castle Pines (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Lakeside (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Mustang (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Kittyhawk (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Builder Finance (Offshore), LLC, Greenlight Onshore Investments, LLC, JBGL Exchange, LLC, JBGL Willow Crest, LLC, JBGL Hawthorne, LLC, JBGL Inwood, LLC, JBGL Chateau, LLC, JBGL Castle Pines, LP, JBGL Castle Pines Management, LLC, JBGL Lakeside, LLC, JBGL Mustang, LLC, JBGL Kittyhawk, LLC, JBGL Builder Finance LLC and Brickman Member Joint Venture (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2014).Description
3.1 
3.2 
4.1 
4.24.2* Certificate
4.3Section 382 Rights Agreement, dated as of March 27, 2014, between BioFuel Energy Corp. and Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., as Rights Agent, which includes the Form of Certification of Designation of Series B Junior Participating Preferred Stock as Exhibit A, the Form of Rights Certificate as Exhibit B and the Summary of Rights to Purchase Preferred Stock as Exhibit C (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed March 28, 2014).
4.4Amendment No. 1, dated as of August 12, 2015, to Section 382 Rights Agreement, between Green Brick Partners, Inc. and Broadridge Corporate Issuer Solutions, Inc., as Rights Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K filed August 14, 2015).
4.5Form of Rights Certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.3 to the Company’s Registration Statement Amendment No. 1 on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on August 21, 2014).Capital Stock.
10.1 Letter Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2014, by and among BioFuel Energy Corp., Greenlight Capital Offshore Partners, Greenlight Capital, L.P., Greenlight Capital Qualified, L.P., Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd., Greenlight Capital (Gold), LP and Greenlight Capital Offshore Master (Gold), Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 15, 2014).
10.2Letter Agreement, dated as of July 15, 2014, by and among BioFuel Energy Corp., Third Point Partners L.P., Third Point Partners Qualified L.P., Third Point Offshore Master Fund L.P., Third Point Ultra Master Fund L.P. and Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed July 15, 2014).
10.3Voting Agreement, dated as of June 10, 2014, by and among BioFuel Energy Corp., Greenlight Capital Offshore Partners, Greenlight Capital, L.P., Greenlight Capital Qualified, L.P., Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd., Greenlight Capital (Gold), LP and Greenlight Capital Offshore Master (Gold), Ltd. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2014).
10.4Registration Rights Agreement, dated as October 27, 2014, by and among the Company and JBGL Exchange (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Willow Crest (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Hawthorne (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Inwood (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Chateau (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Castle Pines (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Lakeside (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Mustang (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Kittyhawk (Offshore), LLC, JBGL Builder Finance (Offshore), LLC, Greenlight Capital Qualified, LP, Greenlight Capital, LP, Greenlight Capital Offshore Partners, Greenlight Reinsurance, Ltd., Greenlight Capital (Gold), LP, Greenlight Capital Offshore Master (Gold), Ltd., Scott L. Roberts, L. Loraine Brickman Revocable Trust, Roger E. Brickman GST Marital Trust, James R. Brickman, Blake Brickman, Jennifer Brickman Roberts, Trevor Brickman and Natalie Brickman, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.5Backstop Registration Rights Agreement, dated as October 27, 2014, between the Company and Third Point Partners L.P., Third Point Partners Qualified L.P., Third Point Offshore Master Fund L.P., Third Point Ultra Master Fund L.P. and Third Point Reinsurance Company Ltd., (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.6Commitment Letter, dated as of June 10, 2014, between BioFuel Energy Corp. and Greenlight Capital, Inc., on behalf of its affiliated funds and managed accounts (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed June 13, 2014).


NumberDescription
10.7Loan Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among the Company, the lenders from time to time party thereto and Greenlight APE, LLC, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.8Guaranty, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among, the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company from time to time party thereto and Greenlight APE, LLC, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.9Pledge and Security Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among the Company, certain subsidiaries of the Company from time to time party thereto and Greenlight APE, LLC, (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed October 31, 2014).
10.10Amended and Restated Limited Liability Company Operating Agreement of The Providence Group of Georgia, L.L.C., dated as of July 1, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014).
10.1110.2* 
10.1210.3 Company Agreement of Southgate Homes DFW LLC, dated as of January 29, 2013 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014).
10.13
10.14†*10.4† 
10.15†10.5† 
10.16†10.6† 
10.17†10.7† 
10.18†Employment Agreement, datedeffective as of January 15, 2015,2019, between the Company and Richard A. Costello (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed January 22, 2015)December 11, 2018).
10.19†10.8† 
10.2010.9 
10.2110.10 
10.2210.11 




Number10.16 Description
10.27
10.2810.17 Loan Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2013, between PlainsCapital Bank and JBGL Capital, LP (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.33 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014).
10.29Promissory Note, dated as of December 13, 2013, by JBGL Capital, LP for the benefit of PlainsCapital Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.34 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014).
10.30Guaranty Agreement, dated as of December 13, 2013, by JBGL Castle Pines, LP, JBGL Chateau, LLC, JBGL Exchange LLC, JBGL Hawthorne, LLC, JBGL Inwood LLC, JBGL Kittyhawk, LLC, JBGL Mustang LLC and JBGL Willow Crest LLC, for the benefit of PlainsCapital Bank (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.35 to the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-197446) filed on July 16, 2014).
10.31†2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan Stock Bonus Award Agreement, dated as of November 9, 2015, by and between the Company and Jed Dolson.
10.32
10.3310.18 
10.3410.19 
10.3510.20 
10.3610.21 
10.3710.22 
10.3810.23 
10.3910.24 
10.40†10.25 Settlement Agreement and Mutual Release, dated as of December 2, 2015, between the Company and John Jason Corley (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed December 11, 2015).
10.41
10.4210.26 
10.43†*10.27 2014 Omnibus Equity Incentive Plan Stock Bonus Award Agreement, dated as of November 10, 2016, by and between the Company and Jed Dolson.
10.44
10.4510.28 




10.48
Number Exhibit Description
10.31
10.4910.32 
21.1*10.33 
10.34
10.35
10.36
10.37†
10.38†
10.39
10.40
21*
23.1*23* 
23.2*Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm to the Company.
31.1* 
31.2* 
32.1* 
32.2* 
101.INS** XBRL Instance Document.
101.SCH** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document.
101.CAL** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document.
101.DEF** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document.
101.LAB** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document.
101.PRE** XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document.
104**Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document contained in Exhibit 101).
 
*    Filed with this Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K.
**    Submitted electronically herewith.
†    Management Contract or Compensatory PlanPlan.
#The Company hereby undertakes to furnish supplementally a copy of any omitted schedule or exhibit to such agreement to the U.S. Securities and Exchange CommissionSEC upon request.

ITEM 16. 10-K SUMMARY

None.




SIGNATURES


Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on March 13, 2017.6, 2020.


Green Brick Partners, Inc.
/s/ James R. Brickman
By: James R. Brickman
Its: Chief Executive Officer


Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated below.
Signature TitleDate
/s/ James R. Brickman Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer)March 13, 20176, 2020
James R. Brickman 
    
/s/ Richard A. Costello Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting Officer)March 13, 20176, 2020
Richard A. Costello 
    
/s/ Elizabeth K. Blake DirectorMarch 13, 20176, 2020
Elizabeth K. Blake 
    
/s/ Harry Brandler DirectorMarch 13, 20176, 2020
Harry Brandler 
    
/s/ David Einhorn Chairman of the BoardMarch 13, 20176, 2020
David Einhorn 
    
/s/ John R. Farris DirectorMarch 13, 20176, 2020
John R. Farris 
    
/s/ Kathleen Olsen DirectorMarch 13, 20176, 2020
Kathleen Olsen 
    
/s/ Richard S. Press DirectorMarch 13, 20176, 2020
Richard S. Press 




9476