UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES

EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Fiscal Year Ended December 31, 20172021

Commission file number: 000-50728

FUTURES PORTFOLIO FUND, LIMITED PARTNERSHIP

c/o Steben & Company, Inc.
9711 Washingtonian Blvd.LLC
687 Excelsior Boulevard
Excelsior, Suite 400
Gaithersburg, MD 20878
MN55331
Telephone: (240) 631-7600(952) 767-6900

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act: NONENone

Securities to be registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: Limited Partner Interestspartner interests

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes☐No☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes☐No☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes☒ No☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes☒ No☐

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐  No☒

Aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates: N/A.

Table of Contents

PART I

Futures Portfolio Fund, Limited Partnership (“Fund”) is a Maryland limited partnership, was formed on May 11, 1989 and began trading on January 2, 1990. Using professional trading advisors, the Fund engages in the speculative trading of futures contracts, forward currency contracts and other financial instruments traded in the United States (“U.S.”) and internationally. The Fund primarily trades within seven market sectors: agricultural commodities, currencies, energy products, equity indices, interest rate instruments, metals and single stock futures.

The Fund’s fiscal year ends each December 31 and the Fund will automatically terminate on December 31, 2025, unless terminated earlier as provided in the ThirdSixth Amended and Restated Limited Partnership Agreement (“Partnership Agreement”). At December 31, 2017,2021, the capitalization of the Fund and net asset value per limited partner interest (“Units”) was as follows:

The Fund’s assets are allocated among professional trading advisors (“Trading Advisors”). Portions of the Fund’s assets may be allocated to other investment funds or pools at the discretion of Steben & Company, Inc.LLC (“General Partner”). The General Partner is responsible for selecting and monitoring the Trading Advisors, and itthe General Partner may add new Trading Advisors in the future, terminate the current Trading Advisors, and will, in general, allocate and reallocate the Fund’s assets among the Trading Advisors as it deems is in the best interests of the Fund and without prior notice to investors.

During 2014,Through year-end, the Fund purchased $58.5 million ofdid not own any Class I shares of the Steben Managed Futures Strategy Fund (“SMFSF”)., having fully liquidated its investment during January 2020. SMFSF iswas a non-diversified series of shares of beneficial interest of Steben Alternative Investment FundFunds (the “Trust”), a statutory trust organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end investment company.  SMFSF issues four classesreorganized into shares of shares: Class A, C, Ianother mutual fund and N. The General Partner serves as the investment manager of SMFSF.

SMFSF has a similar investment strategy tois no longer operating so the Fund using commodity trading advisors to engagewill make no further investments in the speculative trading of futures contracts, forward currency contracts and other financial instruments.SMFSF.

At February 28, 2018, the Fund owned 40% of the value of the outstanding shares of SMFSF. Prior to August 31, 2017, the Fund owned more than 50% of the value of outstanding shares of SMFSF and therefore had effective control of that entity. Accordingly, the assets, liabilities and operating results of SMFSF were consolidated with the Fund through that date. The portion of SMFSF that was not owned by the Fund was presented as the non-controlling interest. Effective August 31, 2017, the Fund no longer consolidated the assets, liabilities and operating results of SMFSF into the Fund. The Fund reports changes in the fair value of its investment in SMFSF on the Statement of Operations. The investment in SMFSF is reported on the statement of financial condition as investment in SMFSF. For financial reporting purposes, SMFSF is treated as a related party. During 2017, the Fund redeemed $19 million of its investment in SMFSF.

The Fund maintains its margin deposits and reserves in cash, U.S. Treasury securities, registered U.S. money market funds, commercial paper, certificates of deposit, asset backed securities and corporate notes in accordance with Commodity Futures Trading Commission (“CFTC”) rules. All related income earned accrues to the benefit of the Fund.

The Fund’s business constitutes only one segment for financial reporting purposes. The Fund does not engage in material operations in foreign countries, although it does trade on international futures markets, nor is a material portion of its revenues derived from foreign customers.

General Partner

Under the Partnership Agreement, management of all aspects of the Fund’s business and administration is carried out exclusively by the General Partner, a Maryland corporationlimited liability company originally organized in February 1989. The General Partner is registered with the CFTC as a commodity pool operator and introducing broker, and is also registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) as an investment adviser and a broker dealer. The General Partner is a member of the National Futures Association (“NFA”) and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”).

The General Partner manages all aspects of the Fund’s business, including selecting the Fund’s trading advisors; allocating the Fund’s assets among them; investing a portion of the Fund’s assets in other investment pools; selecting the Fund’s futures broker(s), accountants and attorneys; computing the Fund’s net assets; reporting to limited partners; directing the allocation of excess margin monies; and processing subscriptions and redemptions. The General Partner maintains office facilities for and furnishes administrative and clerical services to the Fund. There have been no material administrative, civil or criminal actions within the past five years against the General Partner or its principals, and no such actions currently are pending.

Trading Advisors

As of February 28, 2018,2022, the Trading Advisors of the Fund and the allocation of the Fund’s trading level are reflected as follows:

These allocations are subject to change at the General Partner’s sole discretion.

An objective of the Fund’s multi-manager approach is to reduce the Fund’s volatility without sacrificing overall rates of return. Trading Advisors are selected by the General Partner based on a number of operational and performance factors.

Selling Agents

The General Partner acts as a selling agent for the Fund. The General Partner has and intends to continue to appoint certain other broker-dealers registered under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“1934 Act”), and members of FINRA, to act as additional selling agents with respect to Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units. Selling agents are selected to assist in the making of offers and sales of Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units. The Fund currently has approximately 100 selling agents. The selling agents are not required to purchase any Class A, A2, A3, B, I or R Units, or sell any specific number or dollar amount of Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units, but instead use their best efforts to sell such Units. Where the General Partner acts as the selling agent it retains themay retain any selling agent fees, if any.fees.

Futures Brokers and Forward Currency Counterparties

The Fund’s futures trading is currently conducted with SG Americas Securities, LLC (“SGAS”), J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (“JPMS”), and Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (“DBSI”). The Fund’s forward currency trading is conducted with Société Générale International Limited (“SGIL”) and Deutsche Bank AG, and UBS AG. SGAS and Société Générale International LimitedSGIL are wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiaries of Société Générale. Société Générale is a société anonyme governed by French law.one of the largest financial institutions in Europe. JPMS is an indirect, wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of JPMorgan Chase & Co., one of the largest bank holding companies in the U.S. DBSI is an indirect, wholly-ownedwholly owned subsidiary of Deutsche Bank AG, one of the largest bank holding companies in Europe. UBS AG is another of the fund’s forward currency counterparties. UBS AG is a global financial services company operating in more than 50 countries.

The General Partner may, in its discretion, have the Fund use other futures brokers, swap or forward currency counterparties if it deems it to be in the best interest of the Fund.

Cash Managers

The Fund has engaged Principal Global Investors, LLC (“PGI” or the “Cash Manager”) to provide cash management services to the Fund. PGI manages the Fund’s cash and excess margin through investments in fixed income instruments, pursuant to investment parameters established by the General Partner.

Description of Current Charges

Market Sectors

The Fund trades speculatively, through the allocation of its assets to Trading Advisors, in U.S. and international futures markets, and may trade or hold futures, forwards, swaps or options. Specifically, the Fund trades futures on agricultural commodities, currencies, energy products, equity indices, interest rate instruments, metals and single stock futures. The Fund also trades forward currency contracts and may trade options, swaps and other forwards other than currencies in the future.

Market Types

The Fund trades on a variety of U.S. and international futures exchanges. As in the case of its market sector allocations, the Fund’s commitments to different types of markets - U.S. and non-U.S., regulated and non-regulated - differ substantially from time to time, as well as over time, and may change at any time if a Trading Advisor, with the approval of the General Partner, determines such change to be in the best interests of the Fund.

Regulations

The Fund is a registrant with the SEC pursuant to the 1934 Act. As a registrant, the Fund is subject to the regulations of the SEC and the reporting requirements of the 1934 Act. As a commodity pool, the Fund is subject to the regulations of the CFTC, an agency of the U.S. government, which regulates most aspects of the commodity futures industry; rules of the NFA, an industry self-regulatory organization; and the requirements of commodity exchanges where the Fund executes transactions. Additionally, the Fund is subject to the requirements of futures commission merchants, futures brokers and Interbank market makers through which the Fund trades.

Commodity exchanges in the U.S. are subject to regulation under the Commodity Exchange Act (“CEAct”), by the CFTC, the governmental agency having responsibility for regulation of commodity exchanges and commodity interest trading conducted thereon. The function of the CFTC is to implement the objectives of the CEAct of preventing price manipulation and excessive speculation and promoting orderly and efficient commodities markets. In addition, the various commodity exchanges themselves exercise regulatory and supervisory authority over their members.

The CFTC has exclusive authority to designate exchanges for the trading of specific futures contracts and options on futures contracts and physicals and to prescribe rules and regulations for the marketing of each. The CFTC also possesses exclusive jurisdiction to regulate the activities of commodity trading advisors, commodity pool operators, introducing brokers, futures commodity merchants, swap dealers and floor brokers, among others, and may suspend, modify or terminate the registration of any registrant for failure to comply with CFTC rules or regulations. Furthermore, the CEAct establishes an administrative procedure under which commodity customers may institute complaints for damages arising from alleged violations of the CEAct by persons registered with the CFTC (“reparations”). The CEAct also gives the states certain powers to enforce its provisions and the regulations of the CFTC.

Pursuant to authority in the CEAct, the NFA has been formed and registered with the CFTC as a “registered futures association.” At the present time, the NFA is the only non-exchange self-regulatory organization for commodities professionals. The CFTC has delegated to the NFA responsibility for certain registration processing. The General Partner, the Fund’s futures brokers and swap dealers are members of the NFA (the Fund itself is not required to become a member of the NFA). As members, they are subject to NFA standards relating to fair trade practices, financial condition and consumer protection. As the self-regulatory body of the commodities industry, the NFA promulgates rules governing the conduct of commodity professionals and disciplines those professionals which do not comply with such standards. The NFA also arbitrates disputes between members and their customers and conducts registration and fitness screening of applicants for membership and audits of its existing members.

The regulations of the CFTC and the NFA prohibit any representation by a person registered with the CFTC or by any member of the NFA that such registration or membership, respectively, in any respect indicates that the CFTC or the NFA, as the case may be, has approved or endorsed such person or such person’s trading program or objectives. The registrations and memberships described above must not be considered as constituting any such approval or endorsement. No commodity exchange has given or will give any such approval or endorsement.

The regulation of commodity trading in the U.S. and other countries is an evolving area of law, particularly in the context of implementing various aspects of Dodd-Frank and similar laws being implemented in other countries. The various statements made herein are subject to modification by legislative action and changes in the rules and regulations of the CFTC, NFA, and commodity exchanges or other regulatory bodies.

Competition

The Fund operates in a competitive environment in which it faces several forms of competition, including, without limitation, the following:

Available Information

The Fund files Forms 10-Q, 10-K, 8-K, 3 and 4, as required, with the SEC. The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Additional information about the Reference Room may be obtained by calling the SEC at (800) SEC-0330. Reports filed electronically with the SEC may be found at http://www.sec.gov.

Reports to Security Holders

None.

Enforceability of Civil Liabilities Against Foreign Persons

None.

No Limitations on Trading Policies

The Fund’s Partnership Agreement places no limitation on the trading policies the General Partner may pursue for the Fund.

Potential Increase in Leverage

The General Partner may increase the leverage used with a particular Trading Advisor by the use of notional funds. Notional funds are used when a Trading Advisor is instructed to trade an account according to its trading system under the assumption that the account is larger than the actual cash or securities on hand. This additional leverage, while creating additional profit potential which the General Partner feels may be appropriate with certain Trading Advisors in light of the Fund’s multi-trader diversification, also increases the risk of loss to the Fund. It is anticipated that the General Partner will allocate between $1 and $2 to the Trading Advisors for every $1 of equity in the Fund. Throughout 2021, the Fund maintained a notional trading level of approximately $1.60 for every $1 of equity in the Fund.

Volatility

The volatility of the Fund is expected to be similar to what it has been in the past, although it could be more or less volatile in the future depending upon the volatility of the market, the success of the Trading Advisors and the level of notional funding used by the General Partner in its allocations to the Trading Advisors.

Liquidity

Liquidity

Although the Fund offers monthly redemptions, the Fund may delay payment if special circumstances require, such as a market emergency that prevents the liquidation of commodity positions or a delay or default in payment to the Fund by a futures broker or a counterparty.

Complex Fee StructureCoronavirus (COVID-19) Pandemic

Allocation to more than oneThe ongoing coronavirus situation could cause unpredictable rapid market changes and increased volatility, which could negatively affect the trading programs of the Trading Advisor makes the Fund’s fee structure more complex which may impact the Fund’s profit potential.Advisors.

Fund Expenses Will Be Substantial

The Fund is obligated to pay brokerage expenses, Trading Advisor management and incentive fees, General Partner management and incentive fees, ongoing selling agent fees, Cash Manager fees and other administrative fees, regardless of whether it realizes profits. The Fund will need to make substantial trading profits to avoid depletion of its assets from these expenses.

Reliance on General Partner

The Fund’s success depends significantly on the General Partner’s ability to select Trading Advisors.Advisors and support the operations of the Fund.

Dependence on Key Personnel

The General Partner is dependent on the services of Mr. Kenneth E. Steben and key management personnel. If Mr. Steben’s services became unavailable, another principal of the firm or a new principal (whose experience cannot be known at this time) would need to take charge of the General Partner.

Reliance on the Trading Advisors

The Fund’s success depends largely on the ability of its Trading Advisors. There can be no assurance that their trading methods will produce profits (or not generate losses). Past performance is not necessarily indicative of future results.

Reliance on Futures Brokers’ Financial Condition

If one of the futures brokers becomes insolvent, the Fund might incur a loss of all or a portion of the funds it had deposited directly or indirectly with such futures broker. There is no government insurance for commodity brokerage accounts. Such a loss could occur if one of the futures brokers unlawfully failed to segregate its customers’ funds or if a customer failed to pay a deficiency in its account.

Use of Cash Manager

A significant percentage of the Fund’s assets not placed as margin with the futures brokers are managed by PGI. Using investment guidelines established by the General Partner, PGI may invest the excess margin in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. and foreign government sponsored enterprise notes, commercial paper, corporate notes, asset backed securities and certificates of deposit. Although these investments are considered to be high quality, some of the securities purchased are neither guaranteed by the U.S. government nor supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. There is some risk that a security issuer may fail to pay the interest and principal in a timely manner, or that negative perceptions about the issuer’s ability to make such payments will cause the price of these instruments to decline in value.

Investment in Other Investment Pools

During 2014, theThe Fund purchased $58.5 million of Class I shares of the Steben Managed Futures Strategy Fund (“SMFSF”). SMFSF is a non-diversified series of shares of beneficial interest of Steben Alternative Investment Fund, a statutory trust organized under the laws of the State of Delaware, and is registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”), as an open-end management investment company. SMFSF has a similar investment strategy to the Fund, using trading advisors to engage in the speculative trading of futures contracts, forward currency contracts and other financial instruments. Prior to March 2016, SMFSF used a total return swap to gain access to the gains and losses of a basket of trading advisors. The General Partner serves as the investment manager of SMFSF.

Although it does not do so currently, the Fund may investinvests in other pools. The Fund expects to be liable to those pools (e.g., limited partners), only for the amount of its investment plus any undistributed profits. However, there can be no assurance in this regard, and the Fund might invest as a general partner if the situation warranted, and thus be liable for additional amounts. If the Fund does invest in other pools, investors in the Fund could be subject to additional fees, as the Fund would be charged fees by the other pools.

Investment in pools (or similar investment vehicles), as distinguished from direct participation in the markets, has several potential disadvantages. Those investments may increase the Fund’s expenses, since the Fund will have to pay its pro rata share of the expenses borne by the investors in the pools, and the pools may have higher expenses. The Fund will generally be a minority investor in those pools and thus lack control over the pools. The pools might (a) change trading policies, strategies and trading advisors without prior notice to the Fund; (b) substantially restrict the ability of their investors to withdraw their capital from the pools; (c) be new ventures with little or no operating history; (d) be general rather than limited partnerships, thus increasing the Fund’s liability; and/or (e) use aggressive leveraging policies.

Use of Electronic Trading

The Trading Advisors may use electronic trading while implementing their strategies on behalf of the Fund. Electronic trading differs from traditional methods of trading. Electronic system transactions are subject to the rules and regulations of the exchanges offering the system or listing the specific contracts. Attributes of electronic trading may vary widely among the various electronic trading systems with respect to order requirements, processes and administration. There may also be differences regarding conditions for access and reasons for termination and limitations on the types of orders that may be placed into the system. These factors may present various risk factors with respect to trading on or using a specific system. Electronic trading systems may also possess particular risks related to system access, varying response times and security procedures. Internet enabled systems may also have additional risks associated with service providers and the delivery and monitoring of electronic communications.

Electronic trading may also be subject to risks associated with system or component failure. In the event of system or component failure, it is possible that a Trading Advisor may not be able to initiate new orders, fill existing orders or modify or cancel orders that were previously entered, as well as exit existing positions. System or component failure may also result in loss of orders or order priority. Some contracts offered on an electronic trading system may also be traded electronically and through open outcry during the same trading hours. Exchanges offering an electronic trading system which lists contracts may have implemented rules to limit their liability, the liability of futures brokers, as well as software and communication system vendors and the damages that may be collected for system inoperability and delays. These limitations of liability provisions may vary among the various exchanges.

Changes in Trading Strategies

The trading strategies of the Trading Advisors are continually developing. The Trading Advisors are free to make any changes in their trading strategies, without notice, if they feel that doing so will be in the Fund’s best interest. The General Partner will notify the limited partners of any such changes that the General Partner considers material. Changes in commodities or the markets traded shall not be deemed a change in trading strategy.

Disadvantages of Periodic Incentive Fees

Because the Trading Advisor incentive fees (if any) are paid on a quarterly or annual basis, they could receive incentive fees for a period even though their trading for the year was unprofitable. Once an incentive fee is paid, the Trading Advisors retain the fee regardless of their subsequent performance, but no new incentive fees will be paid until after all previous losses have been recovered.

Disadvantages of Multi-Trader Structure

The Fund’s use of multiple Trading Advisors to conduct its trading has several potential disadvantages. Each Trading Advisor is paid incentive fees solely on the basis of its trading for the Fund. The Fund, therefore, could have periods in which it pays fees to one or more Trading Advisors even though the Fund, as a whole, has a loss for the period (because the losses incurred by the Fund from unprofitable Trading Advisors exceed the profits earned by the Fund from profitable Trading Advisors).

Because the Trading Advisors trade independently of each other, they may establish offsetting positions for the Fund. For example, one Trading Advisor may sell 12 March wheat contracts at the same time another Trading Advisor buys 12 March wheat contracts. The net effect for the Fund will be the incurring of two brokerage commissions without the potential for earning a profit (or incurring a loss).

Under certain unusual circumstances, the Fund might have to direct a Trading Advisor to liquidate positions in order to generate funds needed to meet margin calls, to fund the redemption of Units, or to permit the reallocation of funds to another Trading Advisor. Such liquidations could disrupt the Trading Advisor’s trading system or method.

Disadvantages of Replacing Trading Advisors

The General Partner has the authority to reallocate the Fund’s assets among the Trading Advisors, terminate Trading Advisors and allocate assets to new Trading Advisor(s), or invest the Fund’s assets in other investment funds or commodity pools.

Trading Advisors generally have to “make up” previous trading losses incurred by the Fund on portions of the Fund the Trading Advisors are managing, before they can earn an incentive fee. However, a Trading Advisor might terminate its services to the Fund or the General Partner might decide to replace a Trading Advisor when it has such a loss carry-forward. The Fund might have to pay a new Trading Advisor higher advisory fees than are currently being paid to the current Trading Advisor. In addition, the Fund would lose the potential benefit of not having to pay the Trading Advisor an incentive fee during the time that the Trading Advisor was generating profits that made up for the prior losses. The replacement Trading Advisor would “start from scratch,” that is, the Fund would have to pay a new Trading Advisor an incentive fee for each dollar of profit it generated for the Fund, regardless of the Fund’s previous experience.

Limited Partners Do Not Participate in Management

Limited partners are not entitled to participate in the management of the Fund or the conduct of its business.

Non-Transferability of Units

Investors may acquire Units only for investment and not for resale, and the Units are transferable only with the General Partner’s consent, provided that the economic benefits of ownership of a limited partner may be transferred or assigned without the consent of the General Partner. There will be no resale market for the Units. However, limited partners may redeem all or (subject to certain limitations) any portion of their Units at the end of any month, on five business days’ written notice to the General Partner.

Possible Adverse Effect of Large Redemptions

The Trading Advisors’ trading strategies could be disrupted by large redemptions by limited partners. For example, such redemptions could require the Trading Advisors to prematurely liquidate futures positions they had established for the Fund.

Mandatory Redemptions

The General Partner may require a limited partner to redeem from the Fund if the General Partner deems the redemption (a) necessary to prevent or correct the occurrence of a nonexempt prohibited transaction under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, or the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, (b) beneficial to the Fund or (c) necessary to comply with state, federal, or other self-regulatory organization regulations.

Cybersecurity Breaches

The Fund and Traders are subject to risks associated with a breach in their cybersecurity. Cybersecurity is a generic term used to describe the technology, processes and practices designed to protect networks, systems, computers, programs and data from “hacking” by other computer users, other unauthorized access and the resulting damage and disruption of hardware and software systems, loss or corruption of data as well as misappropriation of confidential information. If a cybersecurity breach occurs, the Fund may incur substantial costs, including (without limitation) those associated with: forensic analysis of the origin and scope of the breach; increased and upgraded cybersecurity; investment losses from sabotaged trading systems; identity theft; unauthorized use of proprietary information; litigation; adverse investor reaction; the unauthorized dissemination of confidential and proprietary information; and reputational damage. Any such breach could expose each of the General Partner, the applicable Trader, and/or the Fund to civil liability as well as regulatory inquiry and/or action. In addition, any such breach could cause substantial withdrawals from the Fund.

Indemnification

The Fund is required to indemnify the General Partner, the Trading Advisors and the futures brokers, and their affiliates, against various liabilities they may incur in providing services to the Fund, provided the indemnified party met the standard of conduct specified in the applicable indemnification clause. The Fund’s indemnification obligations could require the Fund to make substantial indemnification payments.

Termination of Fund

The Fund will automatically terminate on December 31, 2025,have an indefinite lifetime, unless terminated earlier as provided in the Partnership Agreement. For example, the General Partner can withdraw as general partner on 90 days’ prior written notice, and such a withdrawal could result in termination of the Fund. The General Partner has no present intention of withdrawing and intends to continue the Fund business as long as it believes that it is in the best interest of all partners to do so. In addition, certain other events may occur which could result in early termination.

Lack of Regulation

The Fund is not an investment company under the federal securities laws. Thus, limited partners will not have the benefits of federal regulation of investment companies.

Conflicts of Interest

The General Partner and its principals have organized and are involved in other business ventures, and may have incentives to favor certain of these ventures over the Fund. The Fund will not share in the risks or rewards of such other ventures. However, such other ventures will compete for the General Partner’s and its principals’ time and attention, which might create other conflicts of interest. The Partnership Agreement does not require the General Partner to devote any particular amount of time to the Fund.

The General Partner or any of its affiliates or any person connected with it may invest in, directly or indirectly, or manage or advise other investment funds or accounts which invest in assets which may also be purchased or sold by the Fund. Neither the General Partner nor any of its affiliates nor any person connected with it is under any obligation to offer investment opportunities of which any of them becomes aware to the Fund or to account to the Fund in respect of (or share with the Fund or inform the Fund of) any such transaction or any benefit received by any of them from any such transaction, but will allocate such opportunities on an equitable basis between the Fund and other clients.

Payment of Incentive Fees to the Trading Advisors

The Trading Advisors are entitled to incentive fees, therefore the Trading Advisors may have an incentive to cause the Fund to make riskier or more speculative investments than it otherwise would.

Personal Trading

The Trading Advisors, the futures brokers, the General Partner and the principals and affiliates thereof may trade commodity interests for their own account. In such trading, positions might be taken which are opposite those of the Fund, or that compete with the Fund’s trades.

Trades by the Trading Advisors and their Principals

The Trading Advisors and their principals may trade for their own accounts in addition to directing trading for client accounts. Therefore, the Trading Advisors and their principals may be deemed to have a conflict of interest concerning the sequence in which orders for transactions will be transmitted for execution. Additionally, a potential conflict may occur when the Trading Advisors and their principals, as a result of a neutral allocation system, testing a new trading system, trading their own proprietary account(s) more aggressively, or any other actions that would not constitute a violation of fiduciary duties, take positions in their own proprietary account(s) which are opposite, or ahead of, the position(s) taken for a client. Proprietary accounts, in trading a new or experimental system, may enter the same markets earlier than (either days before or on the same day) client accounts traded at the same or other futures commission merchants. Since the principals of the Trading Advisors trade futures and foreign exchange for their own accounts, there is potentially a conflict of interest between these principals and the Trading Advisors’ clients when allocating prices on trades that are executed by a futures commission merchant at multiple prices. In such instances, the Trading Advisors use a non-preferential method of fill allocation. The clients of the Trading Advisors will not be permitted to inspect the personal trading records of the Trading Advisors, futures brokers and forward currency counterparties, or their respective principals, or the written policies relating to such trading. Client records are not available for inspection due to their confidential nature.

Effects of Speculative Position Limits

The CFTC and domestic exchanges have established speculative position limits on the maximum net long or net short futures position which any person, or group of persons, or group of persons acting in concert, may hold or control in particular futures contracts or options on futures traded on U.S. commodity exchanges. All commodity accounts owned or controlled by the Trading Advisors and their principals are combined for speculative position limits. Because speculative position limits allow the Trading Advisors and their principals to control only a limited number of contracts in any one commodity, the Trading Advisors and their principals are potentially subject to a conflict among the interests of all accounts the Trading Advisors and their principals control which are competing for shares of that limited number of contracts. There exists a conflict between the Trading Advisors’ interest in maintaining a smaller position in an individual client’s account in order to also provide positions in the specific commodity to other accounts under management and the personal accounts of the Trading Advisors and their principals. The General Partner does not believe, however, that the position limits are likely to impair the Trading Advisors’ trading for the Fund, although it is possible the issue could arise in the future.

To the extent that position limits restrict the total number of commodity positions which may be held by the Fund and those other accounts, the Trading Advisors will allocate the orders equitably between the Fund and such other accounts. Similarly, where orders for the same commodity given on behalf of both the Fund and other accounts managed by the Trading Advisors cannot be executed in full, the Trading Advisors will equitably allocate between the Fund and such other accounts that portion of the total quantity able to be executed.

Other Activities of the Principals of the Advisors

Certain principals of the Trading Advisors are currently engaged, and expect in the future to be engaged, in other activities, some of which may involve other business activities in the futures industry. In addition, each principal of the Trading Advisors may be engaged in trading for his own personal account. The principals will have a conflict of interest between their obligations to devote all of their attention to client accounts and their interests in engaging in other activities. However, the principals of the Trading Advisors intend to devote substantial attention to the operation and activities of the Trading Advisors consistent with the division of responsibilities among them as is described herein.

Fiduciary Responsibility of the General Partner

The General Partner has a fiduciary duty to the Fund to exercise good faith and fairness in all dealings affecting the Fund. If a limited partner believes this duty has been violated, he/she may seek legal relief under applicable law, for himself/herself and other similarly situated partners, or on behalf of the Fund. However, it may be difficult for limited partners to obtain relief because of the changing nature of the law in this area, the vagueness of standards defining required conduct and the broad discretion given the General Partner in the Partnership Agreement and the exculpatory provisions therein.

Selling Agents

The receipt by the selling agents and their registered representatives of continued sales commissions and/or servicing fees for outstanding Units may give them an incentive to advise limited partners to remain investors in the Fund. These payments cease to the extent the limited partners withdraw from the Fund.

The General Partner Serving as Selling Agent

The General Partner also serves as a selling agent for the Fund. As a result, the fees and other compensation received by the General Partner as selling agent have not been independently negotiated.

Futures Brokers

The futures brokers affect transactions for customers (including public and private commodity pools), including the Fund, who may compete with the Fund’s transactions including with respect to priorities or order entry. Since the identities of the purchaser and seller are not disclosed until after the trade, it is possible that the futures brokers could affect transactions for the Fund in which the other parties to the transactions are the futures brokers’ officers, directors, employees, customers or affiliates. Such persons might also compete with the Fund in making purchases or sales of commodities without knowing that the Fund is also bidding on such commodities. Since orders are filled in the order in which they are received by a particular floor broker, transactions for any of such persons might be executed when similar trades for the Fund are not executed or are executed at less favorable prices. However, in entering orders for the Fund and other customer accounts, including with respect to priorities of order entry and allocations of executed trades, CFTC regulations prohibit a futures commission merchant from utilizing its knowledge of one customer’s trades for its own or its other customer’s benefit.

None.

The Fund does not use any physical properties in the conduct of its business. Its assets currently consist of futures and other contracts, cash and high grade fixed income instruments.

The General Partner’s principal business office is in Gaithersburg, Maryland.Excelsior, Minnesota.

None.

Not applicable.

PART II

Market Information

No class of Units of the Fund is publicly traded. Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R UnitsInterests in the Fund may be transferred or redeemed subject to the conditions imposed by the Partnership Agreement.

Class A, A2, A3, B, I and REach class of Units are beingis offered continuously by selling agents on a best-efforts basis at subsequent closing dates at a price equal to the net asset value per unit as of the close of business on each applicable closing date, which is the first business day of each month. The minimum investment for Class A, A2, A3, B and R Units is $10,000, and for Class I Units it is $2,000,000.

Holders

As of February 28, 2018, there were 3,390 holders2022, the number of Class A Units, 1,374 holdersholder of Class B Units, 4 holders of Class I Units and 155 holders of Class R Units of the Fund.units by class were:

Dividends

The General Partner has sole discretion in determining what distributions, if any, the Fund will make to its limited partners. From inception through the date of this filing, the General Partner has not made any distributions.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

No Units were authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

There were no sales of unregistered securities of the Fund during the year ended December 31, 2017.2021.

The proceeds of the sale of registered securities are deposited in the Fund’s bank and brokerage accounts for the purpose of engaging in trading activities in accordance with the Fund’s trading policies and the Trading Advisors’ trading programs.

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

Class A, A2, A3, B, I and RAll classes of Units are eligible for redemption on a continuous basis at subsequent closing dates at a price equal to the net asset value per unit as of the close of business on each applicable closing date, which is the last business day of each month. Redemptions may be made by a limited partner as of the last business day of any month at the net asset value on such redemption date of the redeemed Units (or portion thereof) on that date, on five business days’ prior written notice to the General Partner. Partial redemptions must be for at least $1,000, unless such requirement is waived by the General Partner. In addition, if making a partial redemption, the limited partner must maintain at least $10,000 or his or her original investment amount, whichever is less, in the Fund unless such requirement is waived by the General Partner.

Redemptions of Class A, B, I and R Units during the fourth quarter 20172021 were as follows:

There were no redemptions of Class A2, A3 or I Units during the fourth quarter.

The following selected consolidated financial data of the Fund as of and for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, 2014,2021, 2020, 2019, 2018 and 20132017 is derived from the consolidated financial statements that have been audited by RSM US LLP, the Fund’s independent registered public accountant. This financial data should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” and with the Fund’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto, included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Certain amounts in the selected financial information prior to 20172021 have been reclassified to conform to the 20172020 presentation without affecting previously reported partners’ capital (net asset value) or net income (loss).

Results from past periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future period.

¹ Class A2 Units were introduced in December 2018. Total return for 2018 is for the period from introduction to year end and is not annualized.

² Class A3 Units were introduced in July 2019. Total return for 2019 is for the period from introduction to year end and is not annualized.

³ Class R Units were introduced in April 2017. Total return is for 2017 is for the period from introduction to year end and is not annualized.

The following unaudited supplementary summarized quarterly data are presented for the three-months ended March 31, June 30, September 30 and December 31, 20172021 and 2016.2020.

Current Positioning

AsThe outcome of December 31, 2017,the ongoing coronavirus situation is uncertain and could have a positive or negative impact on the performance of the Fund. In addition to the tragic human impacts of the virus, the resulting economic fallout appears recessionary. The past two U.S. recessions, in 2000 and 2008, were two of the best performing periods for the Fund. However, the future will not unfold exactly like the past and the Fund’s largest risk contribution came from currencies, with long positions in emerging markets, the Australian dollar and the Japanese yen, and short positionsperformance in the Euro and British pound. In the interest rates sector, the portfolio was positioned long, primarily in U.S. and European bonds. future is unknowable.

The Fund had long equity index exposure, focusedFund’s exposures evolve dynamically based on the U.S. Intactical opportunities perceived by the commodities markets,underlying systematic trading programs. As macroeconomic trends change course, for example becoming more bearish, we would expect the portfolio’s exposures to adapt accordingly. For example, the Fund’s current positioning has changed substantially from year end.

During February 2021, the Fund was shortremoved Quantitative Asset Management as Trading Advisor. In March 2021, the Fund made an investment in agricultural grains markets, long in precious metals and very modestly long in energy, mainly in natural gas, with neutral oil exposure. Note that these were tactical positions generated by systematic managed futures programs in reaction to perceived market trends and opportunities. Positions will generally adapta private investment company. In November 2021, the Fund added R.G. Niederhoffer Capital Management, Inc. as market conditions change.Trading Advisor.

Results of Operations

The returns for each Classclass of Units for the years ended, or periods ended from inception to, December 31, 2017, 2016,2021, 2020 and 20152019 were:

† Inception date: July 1, 2019.

Results from past periods are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for any future period. Monthly analysis of the trading gains and losses is provided below.

20172021

January

Markets digestedMuch of January was marked by increasing confidence in a post-pandemic global recovery along with ongoing accommodative monetary policy which helped lift equities for the impactgreater part of the newmonth. Ultimately global stocks finished down in January, however, as COVID variants and unusual retail activity in several highly shorted stocks rattled investor confidence late in the month. Global bond yields rose (prices fell) with the 10-year U.S. administration’s economic policy proposals asTreasury yield surging above 1%, buoyed by expectations for additional stimulus. Commodity prices also moved higher led by gains in energy and agricultural markets. In oil markets, Saudi Arabia unexpectedly cut production helping to boost prices. Finally, the calendar year began. U.S. Dollar strengthened on higher Treasury yields and expectations for fiscal stimulus.

The policy specifics remain uncertain, but market participants showed optimismFund was profitable for most of January, continuing to build on bullish trends in agricultural products and equities. However, the volatility of the markets in the last few days of the month (the VIX spiked 62% on Jan. 27th) worked to offset those gains, resulting in a loss for the Fund that potential changescould not recovered before month-end. Overall, during the month unprofitable trading in currency and fixed income markets more than offset positive contributions from positions in agricultural commodities and, to a lesser extent, equities. Long foreign currency positions including the tax codeEuro and increased infrastructure spending would bolster economic growth. Equity marketsYen were hurt by the rallying dollar, which clawed back some of its losses from last year. In fixed income trading, long exposure in the U.S. and Europe were generally higher, while interest rates held mostly steady. Following broad based strength in the second half of 2016, the U.S. dollar weakened during the start of the year as concerns about trade protection and accusations of currency manipulation began to emerge.

Ongoing strength in equity markets was a positive contributor to Fund performance. Specifically, longhurt by rising rates. Long positions in Nasdaq, S&P 500agricultural commodities provided a lift, particularly in corn and Hang Seng indices were key contributors. Increased economic bullishness also led to a near 9% rise in copper prices, benefitting the Fund’s long copper position. After several months of strength, energy prices drifted lower in January, due partially to the belief that OPEC’s attempts to cut production would be short lived.soybean. The Fund’s long energy positions detracted from performance. Within foreign exchange markets, the U.S. dollar reversal caused losses, as the Fund was long U.S. dollar versus Euro, British pound and Japanese yen. The Fund finished with a net loss. Overall, the Fund finished with a net loss of 2.27%(2.02)%, 2.13%(1.90)%, (1.92)%, (1.87)%, (1.80)% and 2.04%(1.86)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and IR Units, respectively.

February

In February, the reflation trade remained the dominant theme for investors as encouraging economic data along with surging vaccination rates and declining COVID cases/hospitalization helped spur optimism. Against this backdrop, global equities moved higher with the rotation towards “re-opening stocks” continuing. Commodities prices soared as oil surged nearly 20% on the improving economic outlook along with constrained production. Copper moved above $4 per pound, its highest level since 2011. The bond market, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclay’s U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, was also impacted by the reflation trade and is now down -2.15% in 2021. These concerns led to a jump of approximately 50 basis-point in the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield, to 1.4%.

The Fund had a positive return for February, bringing its YTD return back into the black. Profitable trading in equity and commodity markets were the largest contributors as long positions benefitted from the upward push in risk assets. Within commodities, the largest gains stemmed from long exposure in energy, notably oil, while trading in metals and agricultural markets was also profitable. Fixed income produced losses, as rates seemed to have found a bottom, and the uptick hurt the Fund’s long positions. Trading models responded accordingly, and as a result, long exposure fell sharply with long- and medium-term instruments shifting short by the end of the month. The Fund finished with a net gain of 2.91%, 3.03%, 3.02%, 3.07%, 3.15% and 3.08% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

March

In March, the Fed communicated its intention to maintain easy monetary policy until the economy is further along in its recovery. Market participants, however, were increasingly concerned about building inflationary pressure in the U.S. from improving economic growth, the rapid acceleration in vaccinations, and implications of the massive proposed $2 trillion infrastructure package and the recently passed $1.9 trillion American Rescue Plan Act of 2021. Accordingly, the 10-Year U.S. Treasury yield climbed to 1.75% intramonth as investors fear the Fed may need to act sooner than it is currently communicating. Yields in Europe were little changed, however, as the increasing number of COVID cases and potential for further lockdowns weighed on economic growth expectations. Global equities moved higher as the rotation toward cyclical “recovery” stocks continued. Commodity prices retreated with oil correcting on demand worries from European lockdowns/vaccine rollout along with the stronger dollar.

The Fund had a positive return in March. Profitable trading in equity and foreign currency positions were the largest contributors. Long positions in equities were buoyed by the continued strength in stocks, led by gains in European markets and, to a lesser extent, in the United States. Rising yields in the U.S. contributed to USD strength, which benefitted long dollar/short foreign currency positions, particularly in the Yen. The largest losses during the month were from commodities, particularly long silver positions as precious metals were pressured by rising yields and the strengthening dollar. The Fund finished with a net gain of 0.07%, 0.19%, 0.17%, 0.22%, 0.30% and 0.24% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

April

Investor apprehension toward building inflationary pressure seemed to relax in April as the Federal Reserve maintained its easy monetary policy and Chairman Powell indicated it was too early to taper. This helped foster a positive environment for risk assets as market participants instead focused on the continued improvement in global economic activity. Concurrently, the worsening COVID-19 situation in India coupled with Europe’s slow progress in their vaccine rollout tempered growth expectations and contributed to the view that growth/inflation would not spiral out-of-control to the upside. Against this backdrop, global stock prices continued to climb. U.S. Treasury yields and dollar declined in April after moving higher in the first quarter. Eurozone bond yields, however, climbed during the month. The improving economic growth outlook and the weak dollar helped fuel the continued rally in commodities which saw prices for many markets set new multi-year highs.

The Fund had a positive return in April, benefitting from the reflationary trade driving risk assets higher, especially in the commodity and equity markets. In commodities, long exposure benefitted from higher prices in agricultural, energy, and base metal markets with notable contributors including corn, brent crude, and copper. The Fund’s long equity positions were also profitable, particularly in the U.S. while in fixed income, long European exposure accounted for the bulk of the losses as rates pushed higher. Unprofitable trading in currency markets was led by short positions in the Euro and Yen which reversed course by moving higher versus the U.S. dollar in April. The Fund finished with a net gain of 3.98%, 4.10%, 4.09%, 4.13%, 4.22% and 4.15% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

May

Strengthening economic conditions helped push global stock prices modestly higher in May as the ongoing vaccine roll-out and supportive fiscal/monetary policy fueled the recovery. Evidence of the improving economic environment included the strong April 60.7 U.S. Manufacturing Purchasing Manager’s Index reading. In Europe, the Eurozone Manufacturing PMI was 62.9, also indicative of an expanding economy. While the global growth outlook strengthened, inflationary pressure continued to build with the CPI rising a larger than expected +4.2% in April, its fastest pace since 2008 and raising concerns of Fed tapering. These fears were alleviated in part by the disappointing non-farm payroll numbers which fell well short of expectations and helped soften concerns that the economy may overheat. Against this backdrop, commodity prices were generally mixed, though oil (West Texas Intermediate crude) prices moved to their highest level since 2018. Global bond yields were little changed while the U.S. dollar weakened.

The Fund’s positive return in May was driven by long positions in commodity markets. The largest gains in the sector were from long energy exposure, including oil and oil products along with power markets. Long exposure in metals was also profitable while long positions in agricultural commodities had losses, particularly grains where prices retreated from multi-year highs. Foreign currency trading was profitable, led by long positions in emerging market currencies which benefitted from rising commodity prices. The Fund also had gains from long positions in equities, particularly in the U.S. and Europe. Trading in fixed income produced small losses. The Fund finished with a gain loss of 2.05%, 2.17%, 2.15%, 2.20%, 2.28%, and 2.22%% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

June

Economic conditions in the U.S. remain robust as recent data suggests the recovery continues to strengthen. The U.S. added a better-than-expected 850,000 jobs in June while wages were up +3.6% year-over-year. Consumer prices (CPI) jumped +5% in May, its fastest pace since August 2008 and higher-than-expected. The economic recovery outside the U.S. generally remains at a slower pace, with rising concerns regarding the spread of the delta variant, particularly in regions with lower vaccination rates. At the June meeting, the Fed’s stance shifted more hawkish as it projected two rate hikes in 2023. This contributed to the yield curve flattening as yields at the front end of the curve moved higher while longer duration yields moved lower as the Fed’s more hawkish comments tampered long-term inflation and growth expectations. Against this backdrop the U.S. dollar moved higher against other major currencies. Stocks and commodities also moved higher, with oil prices breaking out to the upside.

Futures Portfolio Fund returns were slightly positive in June, capping off a strong first half of the year. The Fund capitalized on rising oil prices as long exposure in oil and oil products boosted returns, led by gains from WTI positions. Trading elsewhere in commodities was slightly unprofitable with small losses in agricultural and metal markets. The largest losses were from currency trading as long foreign currency positions were hurt by the strengthening U.S. dollar. Trading in Fixed Income produced small losses as gains from long exposure in long-term instruments, where rates generally fell in June, were more than offset by losses from long positions in short-term fixed income where rates rose. Long equity exposure produced modest gains. The Fund finished with a net gain of 0.14%, 0.26%, 0.24%, 0.29%, 0.37% and 0.31% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

July

Markets provided conflicting signals in July as the S&P 500 reached a new all-time high while global bond yields moved lower and, in the U.S., the yield curve flattened. The rapid spread of the Delta variant along with the more hawkish rhetoric from the Federal Reserve has shifted the economic outlook narrative. While fiscal and monetary policy remain supportive, market participants perhaps increasingly anticipate that future economic growth will not spiral out of control. This view was reinforced by the +6.5% rise in investor risk appetite.the second quarter U.S. GDP growth, well below the +8.5% consensus expectation. Commodity markets were mixed during the month as energy and industrial metals prices generally rose while agricultural commodity prices declined. The U.S. dollar declined slightly versus other major currencies.

Futures Portfolio Fund returns were slightly positive in July as positive contributions from fixed income trading more than offset losses by currency markets. In fixed income, long exposure in the U.S. and Europe benefitted from the downward move in global bond yields with the strongest contributions from the U.S. Treasury Bond, Australian 10-year, and the Euro Bund. Trading in foreign currency markets versus the U.S. dollar was unprofitable with the largest losses from short Euro and Yen positions. Commodity markets had small gains led by profitable long energy exposure, partially offset by small losses in agricultural and metal markets. Equity trading was slightly unprofitable led by losses from long positions in Asian markets, notably the Nikkei and Hang Seng. The Fund finished with a net gain of 0.18%, 0.30%, 0.28%, 0.33%, 0.41% and 0.35% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

August

Global equity prices advanced during the month, supported by strong second quarter earnings and dovish comments from Fed Chair Jerome Powell. The Fed Chair reiterated his view that recent high inflation is likely transitory and that the Fed needs to be mindful of risks of tapering too aggressively while reassuring investors that rate hikes are not expected for some time. Meanwhile, economic growth showed signs of stalling, culminating in the jobs report that showed August nonfarm payroll growth of only 235,000 versus expectations for 720,000. Consumer confidence also slumped to its lowest level since February of this year. Global bond yields moved higher in August, both in the U.S. and international markets, while the U.S. Dollar slipped from a nine-month high on the dovish Fed comments. Commodity prices were down slightly in August, as oil prices declined sharply on concerns that the spike in COVID-19 cases globally would threaten the recovery in demand.

Futures Portfolio Fund’s returns were negative in August as the positive contributions from equity trading were offset by losses in fixed income and, to a lesser extent, commodities, and currency markets. In equities, persistent long U.S. exposure during the month produced the largest gains. Fixed income losses were primarily attributable to trading in European markets, particularly long positions in the Euro Bund and Buxl. Foreign currency trading was mixed, but overall had a small loss with a long Canadian Dollar position the most notable detractor. In commodities, gains from trading softs, natural gas, power, and precious metals were more than offset by losses in oil & oil products, grains, and base metal markets. The Fund finished with a net loss of (1.26)%, (1.14)%, (1.16)%, (1.11)%, (1.03)% and (1.09)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

September

Many global markets reversed course in September, leaving investors unsure about future Central Bank policy, world-wide economic growth, and the pandemic’s lasting impact. The S&P 500 rallied to new highs and rich valuations got even richer, spurred by positive earnings data and the Trump administration’s pledge to cut corporate taxes and spend heavily on infrastructure. International equity markets also had a positive month as global economic data showed improvement. In Europe, the political risk of potential nationalist party victories in upcoming elections in France and the Netherlands led to a rally in safe haven German bonds and a depreciation of the Euro.

The Fund’s largest gainsIndex was down -4.65% during the month of September. This pullback was concentrated in large cap technology names as represented by the NASDAQ which was down -5.31% during September. This sell off was heavily influenced by upward moving yields due to widespread inflation fears. Yields on the U.S. 10-year Treasury note finished the month at 1.53%, up from 1.30% at the end of August, a level not seen since June of this year. Initial unemployment claims ticked upward to 362,000 during the last week of September, up from 310,000 claims at the start of the month, a record low since the start of the pandemic. The U.S. Dollar continued its upward trend versus most major currencies against the backdrop of hawkish comments by the Federal Reserve. Oil prices remained at elevated levels as global travel continues to slowly return, closing the month at $75.03 a barrel, up over +50% this year.

Futures Portfolio Fund returns were slightly negative in September as positive contributions from Energy trading were offset by losses in fixed income and, to a lesser extent, equities. In energy, persistent long European natural gas and power markets contributed the most as gas supply concerns drove prices higher. Fixed income losses were primarily attributable to trading in U.S. and European markets, particularly long positions on the mid to long end of the U.S. Treasury yield curve. In foreign currency trading, relatively small gains came from long equity index positions, which benefited from the global rally in stocks. Long positions in European bonds and a short currency position inU.S. Dollar positioning, particularly against the Euro both profited from market skittishness over possible populist electoral gains.and Yen. The Fund did seefinished with a net loss of (0.98)%, (0.86)%, (0.88)%, (0.83)%, (0.75)% and (0.81)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

October

After a brief pause in September, the S&P 500 Index resumed its upward trend, up +7.01% in October, and up +26.56% for the year. Strong corporate earnings combined with robust economic growth and accommodative Federal Reserve actions pushed the S&P 500 and NASDAQ to all time highs. Amidst higher equity prices, rising inflation continued to be on the minds of investors as labor shortages and supply bottlenecks have the potential to magnify issues during the busy Holiday shopping season. Movement on the U.S. 10-year note was modest, lossesedging higher 0.02%. The U.S. economy added 531,000 jobs in October, bringing the unemployment rate down to 4.6%, a change of -0.2%. Oil prices continued to climb, reflecting the rising demand for global manufacturing and travel. The price of West Texas Intermediate, soared over 11% in October to $83.57 per barrel, up from $75.03 per barrel at the end of September. So far in 2021, WTI has exploded over 70%.

Futures Portfolio Fund’s positive returns in October were driven by energy, currency, and equity trading, while metals modestly detracted. In energy, persistent long oil and oil product positioning contributed the most as trend-following programs were whipsawed by choppy directionless oil prices.higher demand coupled with supply concerns drove prices higher. In foreign currency trading, gains came from long U.S. Dollar positioning, particularly against the Euro and Yen. In metals trading, short positioning in precious metals detracted as prices rallied. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net profit.loss of 4.32%, 4.44%, 4.42%, 4.47%, 4.55% and 4.49% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units, respectively.

November

Despite a strong start to November for global markets, a new COVID-19 variant emerged, spooking investors late in the month and causing reversals in many of the prevailing market trends. The S&P 500 Index finished down -0.69% as investors transitioned to risk-off assets. Amongst the resurfacing virus concerns, inflation fears also weighed on investors as Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell acknowledged elevated prices may not be transitory and that the Fed may need to accelerate its tapering program. Bond yields ended November modestly lower as rising yields earlier in the month reversed sharply following the emergence of the Omicron variant. Despite the U.S. economy adding just half as many jobs as expected, the unemployment rate continued to drop and reached its lowest level since the pandemic began. Oil prices broke their year-long upward trend, as West Texas Intermediate plummeted over 20% in November to $66.18 per barrel, down from $83.57 at the end of October.

Futures Portfolio Fund’s negative returns in November were driven by energy, equities, and agricultural commodities, while interest rates contributed positively to performance. Despite the overall negative return for the month, the Fund’s diversified approach helped mitigate losses as trend-following strategies were hit hard by the reversal in markets while short-term and systematic macro strategies performed better. In energy, persistent long oil and oil product positioning detracted the most as demand concerns surrounding the new variant and the potential for oversupply pushed prices lower. Also detracting was long equity positioning, specifically in the U.S., which was positive for the fund until the Thanksgiving Holiday. In fixed income, long positions in European bonds contributed as investors fled to risk-off assets, driving bond prices higher. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net gain of 3.33%(2.87)%, 3.48%(2.76)%, (2.77)%, (2.73)%, (2.65)% and 3.57%(2.71)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I and IR Units, respectively.

MarchDecember

Economic policy remained a focus forThe new COVID-19 variant, Omicron, dominated global markets throughoutin the month. President Trump’s proposalearly days of December. As many unanswered questions about the variant were resolved, and fears of another economic shutdown diminished, market participants returned to replacerisk-on assets in the Affordable Care Act failed in Congresslatter half of the month, as it met with resistance from conservative Republicans. The fate of this measure was significant as it provided an indication of Trump’s ability to push through other policies such as tax reform and deregulation. The bill’s failure initially triggered a dip in global equities, but optimism overshown by the prospects for tax cuts quickly returned and markets recovered. March also saw developments in monetary policy, as the Federal Reserve raised interest rates by 25 basis points, in line with expectations. In Europe, the United Kingdom formally triggered the exit process from the European Union, and investor attentionS&P 500 Index, finishing December up +4.48%. All eyes then turned to the possibilityFed and the plan to accelerate the taper along with the ensuing path of populist gainsinterest rates. The seemingly milder variant, along with persistent inflation, reduced the chances of a dovish Fed. This perceived hawkishness by the market drove yields on the US 10-Year Treasury to 1.52% at the end of December, up from 1.43% a month earlier. Despite the U.S. unemployment rate continuing to drop since pandemic highs, investors have begun to scrutinize labor shortages and the subsequent impact on the economic recovery. Oil prices resumed their year-long upward trend, as West Texas Intermediate rose over +13% in December.

Futures Portfolio Fund’s modest negative returns in December were driven by interest rates and metals, while equity indices and agricultural commodities contributed positively to performance. In fixed income, persistent long bond positioning detracted as yields rose significantly into the end of the month against the backdrop of the more hawkish Fed. Also modestly detracting was short precious metal positioning, as prices ticked higher in December amid lingering inflation worries. In equity indices, long positions in U.S. equities contributed positively as investors shifted back to risk-on assets. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net gain of (0.43)%, (0.32)%, (0.33)%, (0.28)%, (0.20)% and (0.27)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units, respectively.

2020

January

In January, capital markets were impacted by two significant developments. Early in the upcoming French presidential election.month, Iranian General Qassem Soleimani was killed in a U.S. airstrike. Iran responded with their own missile attack against a U.S. military base in Iraq, though tensions de-escalated from there. While global equity markets shrugged off these events, they fell later in the month as mounting concerns regarding the coronavirus outbreak fueled a risk-off stance by market participants. Speculation regarding the virus’ future effect on Chinese and global economic growth helped drive rates lower/bond prices higher. Gold also continued to surge as investors sought safe haven assets while oil prices sold-off sharply.

The Fund profited from its long equity exposure,enjoyed a strong start to the year with the strongestlargest gains coming from Europe. Losses occurredlong fixed income positions, which were boosted by falling rates. Foreign currency trading was profitable as long U.S. Dollar positions benefitted from the greenback’s strength. Long positions in interest rate, currencyequities were unprofitable, as stocks were hurt by the coronavirus fears during the second half of January. In commodities, long precious metals exposure was profitable. Energy trading also enjoyed gains as plunging natural gas prices provided a lift to short positions. Trading in agricultural commodities was not a significant factor. The Fund finished with a net gain of 3.19%, 3.31%, 3.30%, 3.34%, 3.43% and energy positions. Within3.36% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

February

After the interest rate sector,S&P 500 reached a new high in mid-February, intensifying coronavirus fears contributed to a massive sell-off in equities while the Fund encountered choppy trading conditions in European rate markets, butU.S. 10-year Treasury yield fell to an all-time low. The rapidity of the primary losses came from Germany, where bond prices rallied against the Fund’s short position. Lossescorrection in the S&P 500 was historic as the Index experienced its fastest ever 10% sell-off. With the outbreak spreading outside of China and cases in Italy, Iran, and South Korea soaring, investors fled risk assets in droves as they grappled with how deeply and for how long quarantines, reduced travel, factories shutting down, school closures, etc. will negatively impact economic growth and corporate profitability. While the severity of the economic toll may be unknowable at this time, some recent datapoints, like the official Chinese PMI indicator which plunged to an all-time low of 35.7 in February, are certainly worrisome. As expectations for the Fed to take action quickly ramped, bond yields plunged. The U.S. dollar weakened and failed to act as a traditional safe haven asset. Meanwhile, the Japanese Yen and Euro rallied. In commodities, oil prices continued their collapse while gold, another traditional safe haven asset, declined during the market correction.

The Fund finished with a negative return for the month as the massive risk-off move by investors hurt long exposure in equities. Overall, foreign currency sector were attributable totrading was not a significant factor during February though during the market correction a long U.S. dollar bias,position was hurt by softness in the greenback. In commodities, short energy positions benefitted from declining oil and natural gas prices as economic growth concerns weighed heavily. Fixed income trading was the largest positive contributor for the Fund as weakening growth and rate cut expectations fueled the collapse in yields which benefitted long positions. The Fund finished with a net loss of (6.57)%, (6.46)%, (6.48)%, (6.43)%, (6.36)% and (6.42)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

March

As the COVID-19 global pandemic worsened and the world economy was brought to its knees, the stock market continued to plummet. At the steepest point of its drawdown, the S&P 500 fell -33.8% from its high before recovering late in the month. The actions taken to stem the advance of the virus are having an unprecedented effect on business activity. Second quarter GDP growth estimates are as dire as -40% while unemployment is expected to exceed the post-World War II high of 10.8%. In response to the crisis, massive stimulus measures have been undertaken by central banks and governments around the globe to inject liquidity and stabilize markets. U.S. Treasury yields reached historical lows in March. Briefly during the month, bonds failed to act as a slower tightening cyclesafe haven asset as yields unexpectedly moved higher when bond prices fell. Meanwhile, oil prices collapsed as OPEC failed to reach a production cut agreement with Russia, resulting in an oil price war that coincided with an historic collapse in demand.

Positive returns during the 2^nd half of March, were not enough to offset losses during the first two weeks of the month. While equity exposure had shifted neutral by the Fedend of the month, the Fund was hurt by long positions during that transition as stock prices continued their collapse. Fixed income trading has been highly profitable in 2020, but had small losses in March as gains from positions in U.S. Treasuries were offset by losses from overseas trading. Foreign currency trading was unprofitable while in commodities, short positions in energy were highly profitable as oil prices plummeted. The Fund finished with a net loss of (6.99)%, (6.88)%, (6.89)%, (6.85)%, (6.77)% and (6.83)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

April

Optimism regarding the potential for re-opening the economy sparked a massive relief rally in equities during April. After reaching its 2020 low on March 23^rd, the S&P 500 continued its recovery in April by gaining +12.8% and recouping much of its year-to-date losses. For now, market participants are looking past the disruption to the economy that has seen the number of individuals filing unemployment claims reach 33.5 million since mid-March, wiping out all of the post-Global Financial Crisis job creation. Instead, positive news on the COVID-19 treatment front, including Gilead’s Remdesivir and the push to re-open in the U.S. and abroad, buoyed investor spirits. U.S. bond yields were relatively stable during the month while yields in international instruments like the UK Gilt and German Bund declined. In an unprecedented development, the May 2020 West Texas Intermediate crude contract closed at -$37.63 the day prior to expiration as a collapse in demand and oil storage at capacity caused companies to pay buyers to take oil off their hands.

The Fund posted a positive return during April. While positioning fluctuated between long and short, trading in equities generated the dollarlargest profits. Long positions in fixed income also produced gains led by positions in U.S. Treasuries and the Euro Bund. Trading in commodities was also profitable, as long positions in precious metals and short positions in agricultural markets provided a boost. Trading in energy was not a significant performance driver as falling prices in the first half of the month reversed course during the latter half. Foreign currency trading was unprofitable in April, particularly a short position in the Australian Dollar. The Aussie dollar’s rally is likely attributable to depreciatethe relative success that country has had containing the coronavirus and accordingly, a faster timeline to successfully reopening its economy. The Fund finished with a net gain of 2.08%, 2.20%, 2.19%, 2.23%, 2.31%, and 2.25% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

May

May saw a continuation of the shift back toward risk assets as investors looked past the current economic weakness and the climbing number of COVID-19 cases. Instead, investors focused on the reopening of the global economy and path towards a return to “normal”. Continued responsiveness by central banks to support asset prices and indications that more can be done if necessary, further buoyed investor confidence. With investor enthusiasm surging, equities, as measured by the S&P 500, have now rallied nearly +40% off their March 23^rd low. In commodities, West Texas Intermediate (“WTI”) oil had its best monthly gain in its history, climbing an astounding ~90% in May to approximately $35/barrel. Bond yields were relatively unchanged at the shorter end of the curve which are anchored by the Fed. Yields for longer duration instruments pushed higher reflecting improving optimism regarding the economic outlook. The U.S. Dollar weakened, notably against the euro, poundEuro which moved higher on improving risk appetite and yen.passage of the $825 billion Coronavirus Recovery Fund by the EU.

The Fund had a slightly positive return in May led by profitable trading in equities, though exposure shifted between long and short during the month. In commodities, there were losses from short positions in the energy and agricultural sectors as prices rallied on hopes that the economy had bottomed. The Fund had small losses in fixed income and currency trading, as declining bond prices and a depreciation of the safe haven U.S. Dollar negatively impacted long positions in these markets. The Fund finished with a net gain of 0.21%, 0.32%, 0.31%, 0.35%, 0.43%, and 0.37% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

June

Indications that economic conditions are bottoming helped buoy risk assets during June. Early in the month, equities surged following a remarkable U.S. employment report showing 2.5 million jobs added in May. Volatility returned intra-month, however, as concerns regarding a resurgence in COVID-19 cases as lock-downs were relaxed and heightened U.S./China trade tension ramped. Risk assets resumed their upward trajectory in the second half of June as accommodative monetary policy, improving economic data, and a belief that politicians would not re-impose strict lock-downs again, buoyed risk appetite. With investors looking at a global recovery, the world’s reserve currency (U.S. Dollar) weakened while cyclical commodity prices moved higher. Within fixed income markets, yields were relatively unchanged.

The Fund had slight losses in June led by unprofitable trading in currencies. While positioning shifted mid-month, long U.S. dollar exposure in the first half of the month detracted as the greenback weakened versus other major currencies. Long positions in fixed income and equities were profitable but were largely offset by losses from trading in commodities. While trading in energy has generated robust gains in 2020, short positions during June were unprofitable. The Fund finished with a net loss of (1.27)%, (1.15)%, (1.16)%, (1.12)%, (1.04)%, and (1.10)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units , respectively.

July

Despite Q2 U.S. GDP plunging -32.9% on an annualized basis, investors in July remained optimistic. Instead, focusing on the recovery in economic data from its Q2 bottom and progress toward a COVID-19 vaccine. While economic activity continued to rebound, the daily number of new COVID-19 cases has been rising since mid-June. Accordingly, a growing number of states in the U.S. have paused or reversed their re-openings, threatening to slow or derail the fledgling recovery. Against this backdrop, however, risk assets including global stocks moved higher. Bond yields were lower with the U.S. 3- and 5-year Treasuries reaching historic lows. The U.S. Dollar Index had its largest monthly drop since 2010, as lower U.S. rates, lack of progress on additional fiscal stimulus, and the increasing number of COVID-19 cases weighed on the greenback. The weakening dollar and risk-on sentiment spurred cyclical commodity prices higher. Despite the move in risk assets, gold surged to an all-time high as dollar weakness, political tension and worsening U.S./China relations provided a lift to the safe haven asset.

The Fund had positive returns in July led by gains from equities and metals trading. In equities, long positions in the U.S. and developed Asian markets more than offset losses from short positions in Europe. In metals trading, the bulk of the gains were from long precious metal exposure, notably positions in gold and silver. Trading in fixed income was also profitable during the month, primarily attributable to long exposure in the U.S. In currency trading, long FX vs. U.S. dollar positions were slightly profitable, benefiting from the weakness in the greenback. Trading in energy and agricultural markets were slightly unprofitable during July. The Fund finished with a net gain of 2.95%, 3.07%, 3.06%, 3.11%, 3.19%, and 3.12% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

August

Buoyed by solid economic data, strong corporate earnings, and a decline in new COVID-19 cases in the U.S., stock prices surged in August as the S&P 500 again reached an all-time high. Against this backdrop, government bond yields rose (bond prices fell) and the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield moved back above 0.70% before settling at 0.67% at the end of the month. Late in the month, the Fed announced a major policy shift, targeting a 2% average inflation rate, signaling that easy monetary policy will remain in place for the foreseeable future. As a result, the U.S. dollar continued its decline, reaching its lowest level since April 2018. The weakening dollar and improving economic sentiment helped lift commodity prices during the month, evidenced by strong gains in metals and in most agricultural commodities. In energy markets, natural gas prices surged as hot weather increased the demand for cooling, and Hurricane Laura shut down much of the Gulf Coast’s production.

The Fund finished the month with a negative return, as long bond positions in the U.S. and Europe were hurt by the rise in rates. Energy trading was also unprofitable, with short positions in natural gas impacted by the rise in demand and supply interruption. Somewhat offsetting these losses however were gains in long U.S. equity positions, and long exposure in base and precious metals, particularly silver and iron ore. Finally, long foreign currency positions, notably the Euro, Australian and New Zealand dollars, were profitable as the greenback continued to weaken versus other major currencies. The Fund finished with a net loss of (2.12)%, (2.01)%, (2.02)%, (1.98)%, (1.90)%, and (1.96)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

September

Investor appetite for risk was negatively impacted by economic growth concerns as the rising number of COVID-19 cases in Europe sparked fears of the potential for new lockdown measures. The likelihood of additional fiscal stimulus measures in the U.S. were dampened as Democrats and Republicans sparred over a replacement on the Supreme Court following the death of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Finally, AstraZeneca’s Phase 3 COVID-19 vaccine trial was put on hold following an adverse reaction by a participant in the UK. Against this backdrop, the S&P 500 fell nearly 10% from September 3^rd to September 23^rd while the tech-heavy NASDAQ Composite reached an official correction during that period. With stimulus efforts stalled and investors seeking safe-haven assets, the U.S. dollar rallied to a two-month high contributing to weakness in commodity prices which were also impacted by economic growth concerns. Yields in Europe generally declined slightly during the month while U.S. yields ended September little changed.

The Fund had negative returns during September. With investors migrating toward safe-haven assets, the Fund’s largest losses were from long foreign currency exposure versus the U.S. dollar which rallied off its August low. In precious metals, long silver positions were hurt as prices retreated sharply from multi-year highs on the strengthening dollar and increased uncertainty regarding the economic outlook. Finally, in equities the sell-off in stocks led to losses from long positions in Europe which were partially offset by gains from trading in U.S. markets. Long exposure in fixed income was profitable led by gains from positions in European markets. Short positions in oil and oil product also helped offset the aforementioned losses. The Fund finished with a net loss of (1.51)%, (1.39)%, (1.40)%, (1.36)%, (1.28)% and (1.34)% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

October

During October, investors were focused on the U.S. presidential election and rising COVID-19 cases in both the U.S. and Europe which set new record daily highs. Market participants’ anxiety increased as the surging case count caused several European countries to reintroduce national lockdown measures which will likely stifle economic growth. As the U.S. drew closer to the presidential election, stimulus negotiations broke down once again, creating additional uncertainty with respect to the sustainability of economic growth. Against this backdrop, the S&P 500 finished down -2.7% during October. This modest decline masked considerable volatility during the month, however, as the Index declined -7.4% from October 13th through October 30th. In fixed income markets, the U.S. 10-year yield moved higher, though yields in Europe fell as lockdown measures were implemented. The escalating coronavirus case count in Europe contributed to a move toward safe-haven currencies including the Japanese Yen and the U.S. dollar toward the end of the month. In commodities, oil prices declined as the outlook for economic growth weakened.

The Fund posted a negative return for October as losses during the back half of the month more than offset gains experienced in the first half. Long exposure in equities was the primary culprit, as positions were hurt by the sell-off in stocks that began mid-October. Losses were most acute in U.S. and European equity indices. Trading in currency markets produced the largest gains as short Euro and long Yen exposure benefited from the move towards safe-haven currencies. Elsewhere, trading in fixed income was profitable as long exposure in European markets where yields generally declined more than offset losses in the U.S where yields rose. In commodities, gains were made from short energy positions while long precious metals exposure detracted. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net loss of 1.97%(1.42)%, 1.82%(1.31)%, (1.32)%, (1.27)%, (1.20)% and 1.74%(1.26)% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

April

Heightened geopolitical uncertainty weighed on risk assets early in the month. Markets were focused on saber rattling from North Korea and U.S. airstrikes in Syria. Later in the month, the first round of the French Presidential elections concluded without surprise, making a Le Pen victory and potential French exit from the Eurozone less probable. As a result, equity markets traded higher and the Euro rallied sharply. The Euro finished April at 1.09 against the U.S. dollar and gained more than 2% during the month. Energy markets were volatile, as an early month rally quickly gave way to a sell-off, with crude oil ending April down 3.4%.

The Fund continued to make profits from its long equity positions, and experienced losses in currency and energy positions. Within the equity allocation, the Fund was particularly profitable trading futures contracts in Euro Stoxx, Nasdaq and the S&P 500. The Euro Stoxx position was supported by the French elections, while upbeat corporate earnings provided momentum in U.S. equity markets. A long U.S. dollar and short Euro position detracted due to strength in the Euro. The Fund was long live cattle futures and benefited from a 15% increase in cattle prices, driven by strong consumer demand and tighter beef supply. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net loss of 1.61%, 1.46%, 1.38% and 1.45% for Class A,A2, A3, B, I and R Units, respectively.

MayNovember

In May, developedNews of the Pfizer Phase 3 study showing its COVID-19 vaccine had more than 90% efficacy helped propel risk assets higher in November. This positive development helped assuage investor anxiety regarding new lockdown measures introduced by some states in the U.S. and in Europe as cases surged. This bullish sentiment suggested market equity indices drifted higher and valuations continued to inflate, spurred by U.S. tech sector earningsparticipants were increasingly looking toward the other side of the pandemic and a centrist victoryrecovery in the French Presidential election. The appointment of a special counsel to investigateglobal economy. Despite the ongoing challenge by the Trump administration’s alleged Russian ties ledcampaign, the conclusion of the U.S. Presidential election also seemed to reduce investor anxiety. Against this backdrop, global stock prices surged, enjoying double-digit percentage gains. Global bond yields also moved higher on prospects for an improving economy. The lack of progress on fiscal stimulus in the U.S., a rising COVID-19 case count in the U.S. versus Europe, and increased risk appetite all contributed to U.S. dollar weakness. Finally, prospects for an improving economy contributed to a brief stock sell-off, but investors quickly shrugged off the news. The VIX volatility index dipped back below 10, setting a new low for the year. In foreign exchange markets, the U.S. dollar weakened against most major currencies, erasing all of its gains since the U.S. election. Energy markets had a choppy month, withsurge in commodity prices, particularly oil, prices declining as OPEC failedWest Texas Intermediate crude jumped to implement larger production cuts.nearly $45 per barrel.

The Fund made gainsposted a positive return for November as long positions in its long global equity positions, especiallyequities benefitted from the big risk-on rally. Gains were particularly robust in the tech-heavy NASDAQ Index. Losses came primarilyU.S., but also included solid contributions from commodities markets, as trend-following programspositions in Japan and continental Europe. Though short positions in energy were whipsawed by reversalssignificantly reduced during the month, trading in oil and precious metals. Currencies also proved to be a detractor, asenergy generated the Fund’s long U.S. dollar positions were hurt by a rebound in the Euro and Japanese yen. Performancelargest losses. Long exposure in fixed income, futures was marginally positive duringparticularly the month. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net loss of 0.61%, 0.46%, 0.38% and 0.45% for Class A, B, I and R Units, respectively.

June

Global equity markets remained stable in the first halflong end of the month, despite a number of major political events, ranging from former FBI Director James Comey’s congressional testimony to general elections in the UK. However, market sentiment shifted at month-end after European Central Bank President Mario Draghi discussed the return of reflationary forces and the potential need to end quantitative easing measures later this year. Comments from the Bank of England and Bank of Canada werecurve also more hawkish than anticipated. Markets interpreted these statements as the first step towards a less accommodative monetary policy environment and the result was a sharp sell-off in government bond markets accompanied by a rally in the Euro, British pound and Canadian dollar.

The Fund made money fromdetracted. Finally, long equity positions early in the month, but the ECB and BOE comments led to a decline in European equity markets that caused the sector to finish down modestly. Interest rate contracts were challenging for the Fund, as global long bond positions were hurt by the fixed income sell-off in the last week of the month. Agricultural prices jumped at month-end after a U.S. Department of Agriculture report indicated plantings were short of expectations for wheat and soybean, hurting the Fund’s short positions in those markets. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net loss of 3.85%, 3.71%, 3.63%grain and 3.69% for Class A, B, I and R Units, respectively.

July

Summertimebase metal markets were mostly quietprofitable but were offset by losses from trading in July, despite political fireworks in the U.S. as Congress attempted to repeal the Affordable Care Act. The contentious nature of the votecurrencies and an inability to reach solidarity within the Republican Party was viewed as an impediment for passing tax reform and infrastructure spending later this year. The sector most impacted by the uncertainty was currencies. After starting the year at $1.05 against the U.S. dollar, the Euro strengthened to $1.18, rising in six of seven months this year and returning to its highest levels since early 2015. Equity indices drifted to all-time highs and largely ignored the political tumult in Washington.

The Fund was profitable in equity and currency markets, with slight losses in commodity and interest rate sectors. During the last three months, the Fund switched from a long U.S. dollar position against the Euro to being short U.S. dollar and long Euro. The timing worked out favorably for the Fund due to the continued appreciation of the Euro. Equity indices have been in an uptrend since March 2016 and the Fund continues to benefit from being long equities. Commodity prices were mostly rangebound in July and had a limited impact on overall Fund performance.precious metals. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net gain of 0.81%2.88%, 0.96%3.00%, 1.04%2.99%, 3.03%, 3.12% and 0.98%3.05% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units, respectively.

AugustDecember

As summer enteredIn December, investor sentiment was buoyed by approvals of the final stretch,first COVID-19 vaccines and optimism toward a post-pandemic economic recovery. Market participants looked past political uncertainty caused by President Trump’s ongoing challenge of the U.S. Presidential election as well as the surge in COVID-19 cases and increased lockdown measures. With investor sentiment toward risk assets remaining favorable, global stocks climbed higher. Commodity prices also advanced on recovery hopes with agricultural markets were generally calm, although there were periodic bouts of volatilityparticularly strong due to dry weather in South America and an escalating North Korean threatArgentinian export ban. Optimism regarding a global economic recovery, heightened appetite for risk, and progress toward a terrorist attackBrexit trade deal between the EU and UK contributed to U.S. dollar weakness.

The Fund posted a positive return for December as profitable trading in Spain.agricultural, metals, and equity indices more than offset losses from fixed income. Gains from trading in agricultural commodities were led by long soybean positions which were aided by dry weather in South America and strong demand which helped lift prices. In metals, a rebound in gold prices boosted long positions while long copper positions were buoyed by hopes for a cyclical recovery which led to copper prices reaching their highest level since 2012. In equity trading, the early partlargest contributors were from long U.S. and Asian positions. Losses in fixed income were primarily from positions in the longer end of the month, equity marketscurve, particularly in the U.S. reached all-time highs, but valuation concerns along with the prospect of North Korean missile tests near the island of Guam caused markets to sell-off. In foreign exchange markets, the U.S. dollar continued to weaken against the Euro, with the exchange rate returning to early 2015 levels.

The Fund experienced broad based profits in August, with the strongest gains coming from the interest rate, metals, foreign exchangeUS and agricultural sectors. Relatively choppy trading conditions in equity markets were a modest detractor for the Fund’s long equity allocation. Within the metals sector, the Fund was long copper and gold futures, which were profitable as those markets rallied. A long Euro exposure was beneficial and the Fund was also profitable trading emerging market currency pairs. Growing trepidation for a looming U.S. government shutdown in the fall led to a drop in interest rates as bond prices appreciated. The Fund was positioned long in interest rate contracts and realized profits as a result.Europe. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net gain of 3.14%4.67%%, 3.30%4.79%, 3.38%4.78%, 4.82%, 4.91% and 3.31%4.84% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I and R Units, respectively.

September2019

SeptemberJanuary

January saw a sharp rebound in equity indices following December’s sell-off. The Federal Reserve moderated its previous hawkish turnlanguage and suggested it could pause interest rate hikes, which boosted investor optimism. Milder market expectations for U.S. monetary tightening led to a weakening of the U.S. Dollar and a helped to boost industrial commodities such as oil and metals. In Europe, concerns over the economic impact of an uncertain Brexit process led to a rally in central bank policy guidance due to rising inflation forecasts. Bothbonds.

The month’s trend reversal in risk assets such as equities and oil proved challenging for the Fund’s trend-following programs, which began the year with defensive net short positioning. U.S. Dollar weakness, especially against commodity exporter currencies as the Canadian Dollar, also detracted from performance. The Fund did make gains in fixed income trading with long positions in European bonds, which rallied during the month. The Fund finished with a net loss of 3.31%, 3.20%, 3.16%, 3.08%, and 3.15% for Class A, A2, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

February

In February, the Federal Reserve and the Bank of England indicated that interest rate hikes were imminent. The Fed also announced that, starting in October, it would begin to sell bonds from its $4.5 trillion balance sheet. This led to a rise in U.S. and European bond yields, a fall in bond prices, a rally in the British pound and U.S. dollar, and a decline in gold. President Trump and Congressional Republicans turned their attention to long-promised tax cuts, propelling stock indices higher. Despite the prospect of monetary tightening and rising tension with North Korea, equity market volatility remained abnormally low, as the average level of the VIX so far in 2017 has been lower than any other year since the inception of the index.

The Fund profited from the sustained bullish trend in equities and also made gains from long positions in the energy sector as oil prices continued their recovery. However, long bond positions suffered as yields jumped on impending central bank tightening. The rise in the British pound and in the U.S. dollar hurt short positions in those currencies. In metals, long copper positions were negatively impacted by a price reversal caused by weaker Chinese demand. In September, the Fund made an adjustment to its line-up of managers, removing Lynx and adding Millburn, whose program blends trend following, machine learning and other futures strategies. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net loss of 3.83%, 3.69%, 3.61% and 3.67% for Class A, B, I and R Units, respectively.

October

Global equities continued their march higher in October, as rich valuations appreciated further. The U.S. saw positive surprises in corporate earnings, gross domestic product (GDP) growth, and consumer confidence. President Trump and Congress turned their focus to tax cuts, which boosted stock market sentiment and strengthened the U.S. dollar. Markets largely ignored the initial indictments that came out of the Special Counsel’s election investigation. The European Central Bank announced itaffirmed they would cutbe flexible and could adopt a less hawkish monetary policy stance in the sizenear term as a result of monthly bond purchases under its quantitative easing program, but extended the duration of the program through September 2018, which was longer than expected.softness in economic data. This led to a rally in global equity indices despite slowing GDP growth. U.S. and German bond yields were choppy, ending the month slightly higher, while the U.S. Dollar gained against most developed market currencies. In commodities, oil prices rose on global supply cuts, while agricultural commodities trended lower.

The Fund made gains with short positions in agricultural markets, particularly wheat and coffee, which saw large price declines. In currencies, long U.S. Dollar positions against the Euro were profitable. However, long U.S. and European stocksbond positions detracted from performance. There were also modest losses in stock indices, as trend-following systems gradually transitioned out of short positions. The Fund finished with a net loss of 0.16%, 0.04%, 0.01% for Class A, A2, and bondsB Units, respectively, and depreciationa net gain of 0.07% and 0.01% for Class I and R Units, respectively.

March

In March, investors grew increasingly worried about potential recession risks over the coming year, due to soft global economic data, as well as Brexit uncertainty and the unresolved trade conflict between the U.S. and China. As a result, the Federal Reserve indicated that it would pause rate hikes, while the European Central Bank signaled an accommodative stance. This caused a yield curve inversion in the Euro.

October was the strongest monthU.S. with 10-Year Treasury yields falling below 3-Month rates, and it led to German 10-Year yields turning negative for the first time since 2016.

The Fund since 2008, with significant gains cominghad a strong month, profiting from the Fund’s long equity index positions in the U.S., Germany and Japan. In the commodities sector, long exposures in oil and industrial metals were also profitable as global growth and stronger demand pushed up prices. Foreign exchange was the only sector that saw losses during the month, as long positions in bonds, particularly in Europe, which rallied as a result of economic growth concerns. Long positions in stocks also added to performance, as equity markets were lifted by supportive central bank statements. In currencies, long U.S. Dollar positions against the Euro Australian Dollar and emerging market currencies declined againstmade a rebounding U.S. dollar. Overall, thepositive contribution. Performance in commodities was relatively flat with modest losses in energy markets. The Fund finished the month with a net gain of 6.41%4.82%, 6.56%4.94%, 6.65%4.98%, 5.07%, and 6.58%5.00% for Class A, A2, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

NovemberApril

Markets were increasingly focused on tax reformIn April, better economic data propelled risk assets higher. U.S. first quarter GDP growth beat estimates, coming in November. Earlyat 3.2%, while Chinese economic activity also surprised to the upside. This led to a sell-off in bonds and perceived safe haven currencies such as the Japanese Yen and Swiss Franc, and a rally in pro-cyclical assets such as global equities, oil and emerging market currencies.

The Fund made a profit during the month volatility picked up slightly as it appeared the Houseacross a range of Representatives was having difficulty achieving common ground on its proposed bill. Just prior to Thanksgiving, however, the House passed its proposal to reduce corporate and personal income taxes. This legislative momentum encouraged market participants to drive the S&P 500 Index higher, which has posted positive performance for 20 of the last 21 months. Notably, in energy markets, oil prices rallied in advance of an OPEC meeting near the end of the month. OPEC’s member-nations unanimously agreed to extend output cuts until the end of 2018 in an effort to support higher prices.

After the Fund posted its largest monthly gain since 2008 during October, performance was by comparison muted in November. Longsectors. In equities, gains came from net long positions in domestic and Asian equitystock indices, contributed positively, but European equity indices were a detractor. Long oil contracts were profitable within the energy sector, butas well as a short position in natural gas contracts led to offsetting losses. Foreign exchange was the top-performing sector due to strengthVIX futures. Currencies were also a positive contributor, through short positions in the Euro relative toYen and the U.S. dollar. Overall,Franc, and long positions in a range of emerging markets. In energy, long positions in crude oil and refined oil products were profitable. Meanwhile, in the agricultural sector, the Fund finishedbenefited from downward trends in grain prices through short positions. The largest negative contribution came from long bond positions, which gave back some of the monthprior month’s gains. The Fund finished with a net lossgain of 0.67%1.28%, 0.52%1.40%, 0.44%1.43%, 1.51%, and 0.50%1.45% for Class A, A2, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

DecemberMay 

Escalating trade tensions dominated financial headlines in May. With the U.S. equities rallied againincreasing its pressure on Chinese phone maker Huawei, trade negotiations between the two countries devolved into heated rhetoric and political brinksmanship. In addition, the U.S. threatened Mexico with punitive tariffs if it did not help to reduce illegal immigration. Trade concerns fed fears of faltering economic growth over the coming year, leading to an inversion of the front end of the yield curve as investors priced in December as the long-anticipated Republican tax plan was passedpotential need for interest rate cuts by the Federal Reserve. Equities reversed their bullish trend and signed into law. This made 2017 the only year in history in whichsaw a sharp drop, with the S&P 500 made positive total returns everyTotal Return Index falling 6.35% in May. Other risk assets such as oil and emerging market currencies also retreated during the month. While fiscal policy was set on an easing track, monetary policy continued to tighten. The Federal Reserve raised interest rates by another 25 basis points

Reversals in global equity and signaled its expectation that there could be 3 more rate hikes in 2018. In energy markets WTI crude oil prices rose above $60 per barrel to finish athad a high fornegative impact on the year, as traders were encouraged by OPEC’s decision to maintain production cutsFund’s predominantly trend-following strategy, which came into 2018.

The Fund enjoyed a positive December,the month with the strongest returns coming from long energy positions, particularly Brent crude oil and various distillates. In the equity sector, long U.S. and Asian stock positions were profitable. Metals were also a positive contributor with the largest gains coming from long positions in copper. In currencies, long exposure to emerging markets generated profits. The only major detractor for the month was fixed income, where long European bond positionsthose markets. These losses were hurtpartially offset by gains in bonds as a sell-off ahead of an imminent reduction in the European Central Bank’s quantitative easing bond purchases. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a net gain of 2.92%, 3.07%, 3.16% and 3.09% for Class A, B, I and R Units, respectively.

2016

January

The Fund made a strong start to 2016, highlighting the non-correlation and diversification potential of managed futures amid prevailing risk-averse sentiment and a sell-off in stocks. Poor economic data from China fueled fear among equity investors of a global growth slowdown. The S&P 500 Index lost 4.96%, while the Euro Stoxx 50 fell 6.62% and the Nikkei dropped 7.95%. In energy markets, crude oil prices continued their descent, dipping below $30 per barrel due to weak demand and the prospect of higher production after the lifting of sanctions against Iran. The European Central Bank responded with talk of more aggressive monetary easing, while the Bank of Japan made a surprise move to negative interest rates, causing a rally in bond markets.

The Fund was profitable in January, posting its best monthly performance since 2008 by capitalizing on bearish market trends. The fixed income sector was the strongest contributor, as the Fund made gains from long positions in European and Japanese bond futures. In energy markets, short crude oil exposure also generated positive returns. Performance was more muted in other sectors, with modest gains and losses. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 5.77%, 5.93% and 6.02% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

February

The Fund extended its strong start to the year in February, further underscoring the non-correlation and diversification potential of managed futures amid rising and falling markets. Key risk factors that weighed on global markets included China’s economic slowdown, U.S. political theater, as well as the risk of a “Brexit”, a British exit from the European Union. Many major indices breached bear market levels by mid-February. However, equity markets recovered over the second half of the month as the U.S. economy exhibited signs of improvement. Commodity markets were broadly mixed and the S&P GSCI finished with its first monthly gain since last October. Natural gas prices fell dramatically due to warmer weather and oversupply, while precious metals rose on safe haven buying.

Fixed income was the top performing sector for the month, as the Fund benefitted from long positions in European, Japanese and U.S. bond futures. The energy sector was the second best performer due to a short position in natural gas and short exposure to crude oil. Other sectors had mixed performance, with modest overall return contribution. The Fund is positioned defensively as of month end, with long fixed income exposure complemented by short positions in commodities and mixed exposures in equities. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 3.88%, 4.03% and 4.03% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

March

The year started with a severe decline in risk assets. By mid-February, however, global financial markets began to reverse course. The rebound continued during March, buoyed by central bank meetings and accommodative monetary policy across Europe, Japan and the U.S. Dovish comments from the U.S. Federal Reserve further reduced the likelihood of rate hikes this year and placed selling pressure on the U.S. dollar. Improved market sentiment also impacted commodity markets, where the S&P GSCI Index jumped more than 6%. There were broad based gains across agricultural, energy, and metal futures.

In the month of March, losses for the Fund were primarily from the fixed income and energy sectors. Stronger risk appetite pushed interest rates higher in the U.S. and Europe, impactingrotation into defensive assets helped the Fund’s long fixed income positions. In the energy sector, indications of supply reductions from major oil producers lifted crude prices back above $40 per barrel, before drifting lower over the second half of the month. Currencies were flat as losses in short euro contracts were offset by gains in long positions in the Australian dollar, Brazilian real and Turkish lira. At month end the Fund’s largest risk exposures were to fixed income and currencies. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 2.88%, 2.74% and 2.66% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

April

Many of the macroeconomic trends that dominated the first quarter reversed course in April, as fixed income markets sold off and energy markets drifted higher. German 10-year Bund yields rose from a low of 9 basis points (bps) to a high of 30 bps during the month, as the European Central Bank held off on adding to its existing stimulus plan. Meanwhile, in the U.S., improving economic data also caused 10-year Treasury yields to climb, hurting bond prices. Oil prices registered their biggest monthly gain in a year, despite major exporting countries being unable to agree on output cuts.

The Fund generated gains in the currency sector during the month, profiting from a Japanese yen rally after the Bank of Japan failed to deliver anticipated easing policies. The Fund was also able to capitalize on the rise in the price of gold and other precious metals. However, long exposures in fixed income led to losses, particularly in Europe, as bond prices declined. Short energy positions detracted from profits after an oil price rebound, while the equity sector was also a negative contributor given volatility in stock indices. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 3.84%, 3.70% and 3.62% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

May

May was a choppy month, as global stock indices declined in the first half of the month before recovering on improved U.S. economic data, with the MSCI World Index finishing the month up 0.2%. In fixed income markets, an early rally was reversed when minutes from the April Federal Open Market Committee Meeting suggested that the next U.S. interest rate hike could come as soon as June. The Fed’s more hawkish guidance also caused the U.S. dollar to appreciate against most currencies, and led to a sell-off in gold.

May market reversals proved challenging for trend-following programs. In particular, the currency sector saw losses as the Fund’s long positions in the Australian dollar and Japanese yen were hurt by the rebounding U.S. dollar. The prospect of tighter U.S. monetary policy also negatively impacted long positions in gold and silver, as demand waned for precious metals as a store of value. Trading was profitable in the agricultural sector, however, with gains from rising soybean prices. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 2.83%, 2.69% and 2.61% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

June

June was an exceptionally volatile month as global markets were unprepared for Britain’s referendum decision to leave the European Union. Investors reacted to Brexit by seeking the protection of safe haven assets such as bonds, while selling equities and the British Pound. The Pound fell 8.5% the day after the referendum, its largest one-day loss on record, which pushed the currency to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar since the mid-1980s. Bonds performed well in the flight to safety as yields on U.S. 10-year Treasuries declined from 1.85% at the end of May to 1.47% by the end of June.

The Fund began the month with mixed performance from choppy markets. However, the Brexit aftermath created strong trends that the Fund was able to successfully exploit. Long positions in UK, European and U.S. bonds, short positions in the British Pound, long positions in the Japanese yen and long precious metals positions all contributed to the Fund’s largest monthly gain since October 2008. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 6.25%, 6.41% and 6.49% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

July

July saw a return to calmer markets after the turmoil of the Brexit vote in June. The U.S. posted better-than-expected labor market data, while stability returned to UK politics with the quick selection of Theresa May as Britain’s new Prime Minister. Global stocks rallied, and the S&P 500 posted a new high for the first time since April 2015. It was a choppy month for global bond markets, but most investors continued to believe that central banks would remain accommodative. The U.S. 10-year yield briefly touched an all-time intra-day low of 1.32%, while Germany issued negative yielding 10-year bonds for the first time. Meanwhile, oil prices fell more than 20% below their June highs after OPEC countries ramped up production.

The Fund profited in July primarily from long positions in U.S. stock indices. Other positive contributors included short positions in oil and a long position in silver which hit 2-year highs. Performance in fixed income markets was mixed, with gains in long-term UK and German bonds being offset by losses in short-term U.S. interest rates. Currencies saw small losses from the Turkish Lira after a military coup attempt. Other declines came from the agricultural sector, where soybean prices fell from their recent highs due to better weather and increased supply. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 2.19%, 2.34% and 2.43% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

August

The end of summer brought about very light trading volumes across most major markets, leading to minimal price movement in equity markets and a moderate sell-off in bonds. Indicative of the calm markets, the CBOE Volatility Index (VIX) closed as low as 11 during the month, the lowest reading in more than two years. Global equity indices traded within a narrow range as traders awaited further clarity on upcoming events such as the Presidential election in the U.S. and the possibility of interest rate hikes by the Federal Reserve. Oil was one of the few markets to see a significant move, reversing a two-month sell-off. Rumors that OPEC was considering an output freeze in September caused the price of crude to bounce from a low of $39 per barrel in early August to $49 around mid-month.

The Fund experienced small gains in agricultural commodities and equity indices, which were offset by losses in oil and interest rate contracts. Fixed income markets sold off due to several comments from Federal Reserve officials suggesting that interest rate hikes were a possibility for later this year. In the energy sector, the Fund’s short oil positions lost money as prices rallied sharply. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 3.80%, 3.66% and 3.58% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

September

In September, investor anxiety over potential changes in central bank policy led to choppy market conditions. Coming into the month, market participants expected that global monetary policy would remain accommodative for some time. Thus, when the European Central Bank revealed it had made no plans to extend its quantitative easing policy, investors reacted with alarm, causing global bonds and stocks to sell off. However, calm returned and markets recovered when the U.S. Federal Reserve decided not to raise interest rates at its September meeting. In energy markets, OPEC agreed to its first production cuts since the 2008 financial crisis, leading to a bounce in oil prices.

The Fund profited in foreign exchange markets during the month, capitalizing on trends in the Japanese yen and emerging market currencies. However, market reversals and seesawing price action in other sectors proved challenging for the Fund’s trend-following programs. In particular, the rebound in oil prices hurt the Fund’s short positions, while a correction in global bond markets hurt the Fund’s long positions. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 2.14%, 1.99% and 1.91% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

October

During October, a broad range of assets reversed course as a result of a rise in political uncertainty in the U.S. and Europe. Tightening polls leading up to the U.S. election resulted in a decline in the S&P 500 and an increase in gold prices. The European Central Bank’s silence on the question of additional quantitative easing led to a sell-off in German bonds as the 10-year Bund yield rose from -0.12% to 0.16% over the month. In the UK, there were fears of a “hard” Brexit scenario, in which the terms of Britain’s departure from the European Union might lead to a sharp increase in European tariffs on British exports. This caused the British pound to depreciate 5.6% against the U.S. dollar, while UK bond prices fell.

The month was challenging for trend-following strategies, with price reversals occurring in a wide range of markets. Currency trading was profitable as the Fund made gains on short positions in the euro and British pound. However, the Fund saw losses on its long positions in European bonds and U.S. equities, which both sold off. In commodity markets, short positions in gold and grains were hurt by a rebound in prices, while long natural gas positions were negatively impacted by unseasonably warm weather, which caused prices to fall. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 5.15%, 5.01% and 4.93% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

November

In November, Donald Trump’s surprising election win altered market expectations for the future course of U.S. economic policy. With the Republican Party retaining control of Congress, investors anticipated that Trump would successfully push through a reflationary fiscal policy consisting of tax cuts and infrastructure spending. This outlook was mostly supportive of risk assets, led by a rally in pro-cyclical equity market sectors such as financials and industrials, while more defensive sectors sold off. Moreover, prospects for stronger economic growth and larger fiscal deficits caused the U.S. 10-year Treasury yield to jump 56 basis points and led to the largest ever monthly sell-off in the Barclays Global Aggregate Bond Index, which lost $1.7 trillion in value. Rising U.S. yields helped to push the dollar higher against most global currencies. After much squabbling, OPEC members passed an agreement to cut production, causing oil prices to jump to $50 a barrel.

The Fund’s long positions in stock index futures profited from the bounce in equities in November. In currencies, the Fund made gains on short positions in the euro, but this was offset by losses on short positions in the British pound, which appreciated during the month. The sharp drop in bond prices hit the Fund’s long bond exposures, which were subsequently unwound. Short energy positions proved to be a performance detractor, as oil and natural gas prices reversed and surged higher. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 1.87%, 1.73% and 1.64% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

December

In December, global markets were influenced by the Presidential election in the U.S., a referendum in Italy and an interest rate hike by the Federal Reserve. With Donald Trump’s election win and the Republican Party retaining control of Congress, investors anticipated that major legislative initiatives for the coming year would focus on pro-growth policies such as tax cuts and infrastructure spending. Interest rates in the U.S. continued rising as inflationary pressure steadily built, leading to concerns that the Federal Reserve may need to accelerate interest rate hikes. Furthermore, an improving economic outlook and the likelihood for tighter monetary policy caused the U.S. dollar to strengthen versus other developed currencies.

Rising equity markets in Europe and the U.S. benefited the Fund’s long equity positions. The Fund also experienced small gains across a variety of interest rate contracts with a positive contribution from long interest rate contracts in Germany and short U.S. interest rate contracts. Foreign exchange trends were similar to November and the Fund profited from being short euro, short British pound and short Japanese yen against the U.S. dollar. Choppy price action led to modest losses in agricultural commodity contracts and metals. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 2.52%, 2.67% and 2.75% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

2015

January

In January, Europe’s economic woes continued to have a major impact on financial markets. In order to combat deflationary pressures, the European Central Bank implemented quantitative easing, committing to purchase €60 billion of government bonds per month for 19 months. This led to further depreciation of the euro and a rally in European stocks. In order to untether itself from the falling euro, the Swiss National Bank made a surprise move to de-peg the Swiss franc, which led to a dramatic 30% intraday spike in its exchange rate. In the U.S., bond yields plummeted, with the 30-year yield hitting a historic low of 2.2%, as foreign buyers plowed into safe haven assets supported by a strong U.S. dollar.

2015 began with a continuation of many of the strong trends seen in the second half of 2014. The Fund made the bulk of its gains in January from long bond positions, particularly in the U.S. In currencies, the Fund profited from a short position in the euro, which more than offset Swiss franc losses. Short energy positions were also positive contributors. Choppiness in S&P 500 led to a modest loss in the equities sector. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 4.17%, 4.33% and 4.41% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

February

February began with a sell-off in bonds after a strong labor market report in the U.S. led to speculation of interest rate hikes in the second half of the year. Improved growth prospects also stoked a rally in equities, as the S&P 500 made its biggest monthly gain since October 2011. Driven by cold U.S. weather and a falling North American oilrig count, energy prices saw a rebound for the first time since the precipitous decline that began in June 2014. The U.S. dollar continued to appreciate against most major currencies, with the exception of the British pound, which strengthened after the UK saw its eighth straight quarter of positive growth.

The Fund’s largest gains for the month came from its long stock index positions. However, trend reversals in bonds hurt the Fund’s long fixed income positions. In currencies, profits made on declines in the euro and Japanese yen were offset by losses from the rising British pound. Short exposure in energy markets also detracted from performance as oil prices staged a minor recovery. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 0.07%, 0.21% and 0.28% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

March

Monetary easing in Europe remained the dominant theme in financial markets in March. The European Central Bank began its bond purchases under its new quantitative easing program, designed to lower borrowing costs and stimulate growth in the region. This pushed down German 10-year bond yields to below 0.2%, and caused the euro to depreciate to its lowest level against the U.S. dollar since 2003. Meanwhile, the U.S. Federal Open Market Committee struck a more dovish tone than the market expected on the timing of interest rate hikes, despite positive labor market trends. In energy markets, a continued supply glut pushed oil prices down to $44 per barrel during the month.

The Fund’s largest gains for the month came from its long fixed income positions, particularly in U.S. short term interest rates and UK gilts. In currencies, short euro positions against the U.S. dollar proved profitable. Short oil positions also contributed positively, taking advantage of the slide in energy prices. Performance in equity indices was flat with gains in Europe and Japan being offset by losses in the U.S. Overall, the Fund finished the month with a gain of 2.00%, 2.15% and 2.07% for Class A, B and I Units, respectively.

April

In April, markets were quiet through the first three weeks of the month, but a shift in sentiment towards European monetary easing during the final days of the month caused reversals in many of the most profitable trends from the first quarter. Signs of economic improvement in Europe raised fears that quantitative easing programs would be removed sooner than anticipated. The result was a sudden rise in interest rates, and a rebound in the euro along with a retreat in European equity markets.

The Fund experienced its largest losses in currencies, interest rates and energy. Losses were partially offset by gains in non-European stock indices. In currencies, the Fund’s net short position against the euro accounted for the majority of losses. In the interest rate instruments, losses occurred during the last week of the month, primarily from Gilts, Canadian Bonds, U.S. Treasury Bonds and German Bunds. Stock indices experienced broad based gains, with long positions in the Hang Sang and Chinese equity index contributing to performance. The Fund finished the month with a loss of 4.04%, 3.89% and 3.81% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.

May

The sudden deterioration in investor sentiment over Europe’s quantitative easing (QE) program carried over from April into the first half of May. Yields on the German Bund, which had previously been on a steady decline, rose sharply from a low of 7 basis points (bps) in late April to a high of 72bps by mid-May. The euro also rebounded against the U.S. dollar, reversing its depreciating trend. However, in the second half of the month worries over Greek debt repayments and an announcement by the European Central Bank (ECB) that it could bring forward its scheduled bond purchases from July and August into June caused the euro and European bond yields to fall once again. Meanwhile, in Japan, expectations of further monetary stimulus on the back of disappointing economic data drove the Japanese yen to a 12-year low against the U.S. dollar, which boosted export-oriented Japanese stocks.

The Fund saw losses in the first half of May as a result of a sharp sell-off in bonds, particularly in the German Bund. Other early losses came as a result of a rebound in precious metal prices, which hurt the Fund’s short positions. The Fund made some gains later in the month through short positions in the euro and Japanese yen, which benefited from a depreciation of those currencies against the U.S. dollar. Nevertheless, the Fund finished the month with a loss of 1.42%, 1.27% and 1.19% on Class A, B and I units, respectively.

June

June saw large reversals across a broad range of markets as a result of shifting sentiment in Europe and Asia. The Greek debt crisis once again became a focal point for investors. After early optimism on a possible bailout deal, the Greek government shocked markets with a weekend announcement that the European creditors’ proposed bailout plan and austerity demands would be put to a national referendum, increasing the risk of a full default and a Greek exit from the Eurozone. This caused the largest ever gap decline in Eurostoxx equity index futures when markets re-opened on the last Monday of the month. Elsewhere, the frothy Chinese equity market extended its huge run up before falling more than 20%. Chinese authorities sought to quell concerns by cutting interest rates for the fourth time since last November, causing stocks to rebound. Apart from the macroeconomic issues that dominated headlines, unexpectedly heavy rainfall in the U.S. Midwest delayed crop plantings and caused a sharp reversal in the downtrend recently seen in agricultural commodities.

Equity indices, particularly in Europe, were the biggest detractors during the month, as long positions were hurt when the crisis in Greece sparked a broad stock sell-off. Short positions in agricultural commodities also struggled duringdetracted from performance as poor weather in growing regions caused a rise in grain prices. The Fund finished with a net loss of 3.38%, 3.27%, 3.24%, 3.16%, and 3.22% for Class A, A2, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

June

In June, several leading indicators for economic growth weakened, prompting central banks around the month. Wheatworld to make increasingly dovish policy signals. Global bond prices rallied as a result, with yields falling in most developed markets. German 10-year Bund yields tumbled further below zero, setting an all-time record low of -0.33%. Expectations that the Fed might cut U.S. interest rates more than other countries led to a weakening of the U.S. Dollar. Despite economic risks on the horizon, equity investors were focused on the potential for more monetary stimulus and corn prices jumped suddenly, reversing their entire year-to-date trend declineprogress in just seven trading days, as wet weather delayed plantingsU.S./China trade talks, leading to a strong rise in stock indices.

The largest contributions in June came from long positions in global bonds and reduced supply forecasts. A choppy environmentstocks. These gains were somewhat offset by losses in currencies, also proved challenging, as a rebound in the euroEuro hurt the Fund’s short Euro positions. Commodities were a minor detractor, as oil and other markets saw trendless, choppy moves. Overall however, the Japanese yen rebounded against the U.S. dollar. The Fund benefitted from sustained, sizable trends, and finished the month with strong positive performance. The Fund finished with a lossnet gain of 6.94%3.42%, 6.80%3.54%, 3.57%, 3.65%, and 6.73%3.59% for Class A, A2, B, I, and I units,R Units, respectively.

July

In July, sawfinancial markets begin to trend again after the reversals of the second quarter. While global equity and fixed income markets moved modestly higher for the month, commodities were down more than 14%, as represented by the S&P GSCI. The decline in commodities was caused by weakening demand from China, a stronger U.S. dollar and supply/demand imbalances. Energy markets experienced the strongest sell-off as crude oil futures lost more than 21%, hitting a low of $47 per barrel by month end. Markets were concerned with a surprise increase in the U.S. oil rig count, as well as potential new supply from Iran after a lifting of sanctions. In metals markets, concerns about slowing growth in China put pressurefocused their attention on the price of industrial metals. This broad commodity weakness also led to depreciation in the currencies of exporting countries, such as Canada and Australia.

The Fund enjoyed a strong rebound in July, making profits in metals, energy, currencies and interest rates. Performance in agricultural commodities was flat, while equity indices were a marginal detractor. The metals sector was the top contributor and gold was the best performing contract, as short positions benefitted from declining prices. Gold futures prices were down over 6% in July, due to both U.S. dollar strength and a disclosure from China’santicipated central bank that it had purchased less gold during the prior six years than markets realized. Short positions in energy markets profitedaction. In Europe, investors expected further easing from falling Brent and WTI crude oil prices. Short exposure to commodity exporting currencies and long fixed income positions also made gains. The Fund finished the month with a gain of 5.68%, 5.83% and 5.93% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.

August

In August, news from China led to a tumultuous month for global financial markets. China’s CSI 300 equity index fell 37% by month end from its June peak, which impacted emerging markets, before spreading to developed markets, with the S&P 500 falling as much as 11% intra-month. Speculation mounted that the Fed might respond by deferring U.S. interest rate hikes, leading to weakness in the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen. Commodity prices also fell for most of the month, but the last three trading days saw a 27% rebound in oil prices, the largest percentage jump since 1990.

The Fund came into August with long positions in developed market equities, and was hit by the sharp sell-off in the second half of the month. Trend following managers moved to a net short position in stock indices by month-end, but not before incurring losses. In foreign exchange markets, the decline in the U.S. dollar hurt the Fund’s long dollar exposure against major currencies. Early gains in long fixed income and short commodity positions were offset at month end after sharp, choppy reversals in these markets. The Fund finished the month with a loss. The trading strategies employed in the Fund have the potential to take advantage of periods of extended market stress, but it is normal to suffer drawdowns at turning points, as managers respond to new trends and reposition their portfolios. Managers’ trading systems are designed to react to price patterns that evolve over the course of days and months. However, it is important to remember that extreme intraday and overnight price reversals, which we saw in August, can be challenging to navigate. Despite this month’s setback, we believe that the Fund’s managers will be successful over the long-term and deliver valuable diversification for investors’ portfolios. The Fund finished the month with a loss of 5.85%, 5.71% and 5.63% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.

September

The global equity rout which began in August spilled over into September. In the U.S., the S&P 500 declined 2.5% during the month. International stocks fell even more, as the Eurostoxx 50 was down 5.1% and the Nikkei dropped 7.3%. China’s slowdown continued to weigh on a broad range of industrial commodities. An overhang in global supply in crude oil relative to reduced demand caused prices to fall from $50 to $45 per barrel. Amid the backdrop of weak global growth, the Fed delayed its first interest rate hike and fixed income markets rallied.

Trend-following managers were able to capitalize on September’s decline in investor risk sentiment. The largest positive contributing sector was fixed income, with profitable long positions in interest rate futures as well as in long term bonds. Short oil exposure benefited from the sell-off in energy. Equity positions were small during the month and had little impact on performance. In agricultural markets, the Fund gained on short positions in cattle futures, as robust growth in herds pushed down prices. However this was offset by short positions in sugar as excessive rain in Brazil caused prices to spike. The Fund finished the month with a gain of 3.87%, 4.03% and 4.11% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.

October

After several tumultuous months, risk appetite returned to global markets in October. Equity indices led the way, as the S&P 500 Index finished with a gain of 8.4%. China’s recent stock market volatility subsided, providing a catalyst for improved investor sentiment. Later in the month,both the European Central Bank further supported markets by emphasizingand the potential for more quantitative easing dueBank of England in response to low levelsweakening economic growth and the prospect of inflation.a hard Brexit under new UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson. As a result, bond yields fell in Germany and the UK, while the Euro and Pound Sterling depreciated against the U.S. Dollar. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve gavedelivered its strongest indication yet thatfirst interest rate hikes could happencut in 10 years, in an attempt to offset risks from worsening business confidence indicators and deteriorating trade relations between the US and China. Global equity indices rose on the prospect of more central bank support, while gold rallied to its highest level since 2013 on the expectation of looser monetary policies.

Amid all this uncertainty and volatility, the Fund had a strong month. The currency sector was the largest contributor, as soon as December.

The sudden change in risk sentiment created a challenging environment for many trend-following managers, as price trends reversed. While the Fund’sgains came from short positions in the Euro and Pound Sterling. The Fund was also profitable in the fixed income sector, as long positions benefited from the rally in European and UK bonds. Gains were also made in long equity indicespositions, while performance was flat in physical commodities. The Fund finished with a net gain of 3.66%, 3.78%, 3.76%, 3.81%, 3.89%, and energy contributed positively3.83% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

August

In August, financial markets became increasingly concerned about the potential impact of a trade war on global growth. The U.S. and China threatened each other with additional tariffs, and the Chinese currency depreciated to performance,its weakest level since 2008. Meanwhile, in Europe, the prospect of a “no deal” Brexit became more likely. Global bonds rallied strongly in an environment of rising macroeconomic risks. U.S. 30-year Treasury bond yields declined to an all-time low of 1.95% during the month, while 10-year bond yields dropped further into negative territory in Japan, Germany and 11 other European countries. Global equities sold off during the month, while gold rallied.

The Fund enjoyed a strong month, even as risk assets like equities sold off. The largest gains came from long positions in a range of global bond futures. Modest long equity positions detracted from performance. However, the Fund profited in foreign exchange markets, through long U.S. Dollar positions against the Euro and emerging market currencies. Commodities were also a positive contributor, benefiting from short agricultural commodities,exposures, as well as long gold and short copper positions in the metals sector. The Fund finished with a net gain of 3.04%, 3.16%, 3.15%, 3.20%, 3.28%, and 3.21% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

September

In September, investor risk appetite grew after signs of progress in U.S.-China trade relations, leading to a rise in global equity indices. Central banks in the U.S., Europe and Japan precipitated a sell-off in bonds after signaling that they saw limits on how much more they could push down interest rates were the largest detractors.and bond yields to support economic growth. In energy markets, mild U.S. weathera drone attack on Saudi facilities caused a temporary 15% spike in crude oil prices, the largest one day jump in over 10 years.

Some of the profitable trends from July and August made partial reversals in September. While the Fund made gains in long stock index positions, there were losses in fixed income futures as a result of a correction in bond prices. In the commodities sector, short positions in grains, short positions in energy and long positions in precious metals all saw declines on market reversals. The Fund finished with a net loss of 2.90%, 2.79%, 2.80%, 2.76%, 2.68% and 2.74% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

October

In October, the Federal Reserve made its third interest rate cut of the year as global growth data continued to underwhelm. Market sentiment improved, however, as a result of apparent progress in both Brexit negotiations and the U.S.-China trade conflict. The UK was given a tailwind3-month Brexit deadline extension, allowing time for a general election and a chance for the UK Prime Minister to try to build a parliamentary majority to approve a draft Brexit deal. This led to a “risk-on” rally in European stocks, a rebound in European currencies, particularly the British Pound, and a sell-off in global bonds. Meanwhile, the U.S. and China appeared willing to compromise in the first phase of trade talks towards a possible long-term agreement. This positive development led to a rotation out of bonds and into stocks in the U.S. and Asia.

The Fund saw declines in its long positions in global bonds, as investors rolled out of perceived safe-haven assets, reversing a bullish bond trend from earlier in the year. In the foreign exchange sector, short positions in the Euro and British Pound were also detractors as those currencies recovered. Commodities also saw a modest giveback as a result of choppy price action. However, the Fund did make gains in its long equity positions, capitalizing on stronger investor risk appetite during the month. The Fund finished with a net loss of 3.66%, 3.54%, 3.56%, 3.51%, 3.54%, and 3.50% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

November

In November, global equities rallied as the U.S. and China appeared to make progress in trade negotiations. Better U.S. economic data made it likely the Federal Reserve would pause interest rate cuts, which led to a rally in the U.S. dollar against most currencies. Meanwhile, pre-election polls in the UK pointed to a likely Conservative Party victory, raising the likelihood of a soft rather than hard Brexit. Investors became less risk averse, rotating away from perceived safe-haven assets such as bonds and gold, and into stocks.

The Fund enjoyed a positive month, with the strongest gains coming from long positions in global stock indices. Currencies were also a positive contributor, as the Fund’s long U.S. dollar/short natural gas position.Euro position benefited from a dollar rally. Greater investor risk appetite caused bonds to sell off, negatively impacting long exposures in fixed income futures. In commodities, metals were the primary detractor due to price reversals in gold and nickel. Trading in agricultural and energy contracts saw mixed results. The Fund finished with a net gain of 1.05%, 1.17%, 1.16%, 1.20%, 1.28% and 1.22% for Class A, A2, A3, B, I, and R Units, respectively.

December

December saw a continued rally in global equities and other risk assets. Rising investor risk tolerance was driven by a preliminary U.S.-China trade agreement, as well as a Conservative Party win in the UK elections, which resolved much of the policy uncertainty surrounding Brexit. In domestic politics, the passage of articles of impeachment against President Trump did little to dampen market optimism. Monetary policy across the globe remained largely expansionary, while international economic growth data improved. This macroeconomic boost, together with rising oil prices, spurred an increase in inflation expectations, which pushed gold prices higher and caused bonds to sell off.

The Fund made gains during the month from its long positions in equities. However, there were declines in fixed income and currency trading, as falling bond prices and a depreciation of the U.S. Dollar negatively impacted the Fund’s long positions in these markets. In commodities, the Fund profited from long oil and long precious metals exposures. There were modest losses from short positions in the agricultural sector short positions in live cattle were negatively impacted by a sharp price recovery despite continued growth in herds. A sharp sell-off in fixed income as a resultthe re-opening of the Federal Reserve’s rate hike comments hurtChinese market to U.S. exports caused prices to rise. While the Fund’s long bond position. The Fund saw a net decline in December, it finished the monthyear with a loss of 1.94%, 1.79% and 1.71% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.positive return.

November

The Fund benefited from numerous trends in November, gaining over 5% for the month. Commodities continued their year-to-date decline, as the GSCI Total Return Index came under additional selling pressure in November, falling 9.0% for the month. Meanwhile, most major equity markets gained during the month, while U.S. fixed income markets stumbled and European fixed income markets were moderately stronger. Central banks remained in the headlines, with minutes from the recent FOMC meeting suggesting that the Fed was comfortable with a potential interest rate hike in December. In contrast, officials in Europe kept open the possibility of further easing measures by the end of the year.Liquidity

Positions in currencies, energy, metals, agricultural commodities and equity indices contributed positively to performance, while fixed income positions were marginal detractors. Expectations of a Fed rate hike, coupled with potential monetary easing in Europe drove profitability in the Fund’s short euro position against the U.S. dollar. However, the same theme led to losses in U.S. fixed income contracts where the Fund was positioned long across most maturities. Short positioning in physical commodities was profitable, particularly in energy, where oversupply and a mild start to the winter season helped the Funds’ natural gas and crude oil positions. The Fund finished the month with a gain of 5.63%, 5.79% and 5.88% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.

December

December saw large price reversals in European futures markets. Early in the month, the European Central Bank disappointed investors by announcing modest monetary easing measures, after months of rhetoric that suggested more aggressive policy action might be coming. European bonds and stocks sold off sharply, while the euro rallied against the U.S. dollar. German 10-year Bunds experienced their largest one day loss since the inception of that futures market in 1990. In the U.S., the Federal Reserve raised interest rates for the first time in nearly a decade, but this had limited impact on markets as prices largely reflected that information prior to the announcement. Separately, OPEC decided to maintain production targets despite lower oil prices, placing further selling pressure on crude oil.

Short energy positions were profitable for the Fund, as crude oil futures fell below $36 per barrel, matching prices last seen during the financial crisis in 2008. However, market reversals after the ECB’s underwhelming policy actions caused losses in currencies, fixed income and equity indices. The Fund’s main detractors were Euro-centric, including the euro, the German Bund and the Euro Stoxx 50. The Fund finished the month with a net loss. The Fund finished the month with a loss of 4.77%, 4.63% and 4.55% for Class A, B and I units, respectively.

Liquidity

There are no known material trends, demands, commitments, events, or uncertainties at the present time that are reasonably likely to result in the Fund’s liquidity increasing or decreasing in any material way.

Capital Resources

The Fund intends to raise additional capital through the continued sale of Units and does not intend to raise capital through borrowing. Due to the nature of the Fund’s business, the Fund does not contemplate making capital expenditures. The Fund does not have, nor does it expect to have, any capital assets. Redemptions, exchanges and sales of Units in the future will affect the amount of funds available for investment in futures contracts, etc. in subsequent periods. It is not possible to estimate the amount, and therefore the impact, of future inflows and outflows funds related to the sale and redemption of Units. There are no known material trends, favorable or unfavorable, that would affect, nor any expected material changes to, the Fund’s capital resource arrangements at the present time.

Contractual Obligations

The Fund does not have any contractual obligations of the type contemplated by Item 303(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Fund’s sole business is trading futures and forward currency contracts, both long (contracts to buy) and short (contracts to sell).

Off-Balance Sheet Risk

The term “off-balance sheet risk” refers to an unrecorded potential liability that, even though it does not appear on the balance sheet, may result in future obligation or loss. The Fund trades in futures and forward currency contracts and is therefore a party to financial instruments with elements of off-balance sheet market and credit risk. In entering into these contracts there exists a risk to the Fund that such contracts may be significantly influenced by market conditions, such as interest rate volatility, resulting in such contracts being less valuable. If the markets should move against all of the futures interests positions of the Fund at the same time, and if the trading advisors were unable to offset futures interest positions of the Fund, the Fund could lose all of its assets and the limited partners would realize a 100% loss. The General Partner minimizes market risk through diversification of the portfolio allocations to multiple trading advisors and strategies, and maintenance of a margin-to-equity ratio that rarely exceeds 35%.

In addition to subjecting the Fund to market risk, upon entering into futures and forward currency contracts there is a risk that the counterparty will not be able to meet its obligations to the Fund. The counterparty for futures contracts traded in the U.S. and on most foreign exchanges is the clearinghouse associated with such exchange. In general, clearinghouses are backed by the corporate members of the clearinghouse who are required to share any financial burden resulting from the non-performance by one of their members and, as such, should significantly reduce this risk. In cases where the clearinghouse is not backed by the clearing members, as is the case with some foreign exchanges, it is normally backed by a consortium of banks or other financial institutions.

In the case of forward currency contracts, which are traded on the interbank market rather than on exchanges, the counterparty is generally a single bank or other financial institution, rather than a group of financial institutions, thus there may be a greater counterparty risk. The General Partner utilized only those counterparties that it believes to be creditworthy for the Fund. All positions of the Fund are valued each day on a mark-to-market basis. There can be no assurance, however, that any clearing member, clearinghouse or other counterparty will be able to meet its obligations to the Fund.

The Fund may invest in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. and foreign government sponsored enterprise notes, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, asset backed securities and corporate notes. Should an issuing entity default on its obligation to the Fund and such entity is not backed by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government, the Fund bears the risk of loss of the amount expected to be received. The Fund minimizes this risk by only investing in securities and certificates of deposit of firms with high quality debt ratings.

Significant Accounting Policies

A summary of the Fund’s significant accounting policies areis included in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements.

The Fund’s most significant accounting policy is the valuation of its assets invested in U.S. and foreign futures and forward currency contracts, and fixed income instruments. The Fund’s futures contracts are exchange-traded, with the fair value of these contracts based on exchange settlement prices. The fair values of non-exchange-traded contracts, such as forward currency contracts, are based on third-party quoted dealer values on the interbank market. The fair value of money market funds is based on quoted market prices for identical shares. U.S. Treasury securities are stated at fair value based on quoted market prices for identical assets in an active market. Notes of U.S. and foreign government sponsored enterprises, as well as certificates of deposit, commercial paper, asset backed securities and corporate notes, are stated at fair value based on quoted market prices for similar assets in an active market. Given the valuation sources, there is little judgment or uncertainty involved in the valuation of these assets, and it is unlikely that materially different amounts would be reported under different valuation methodologies or assumptions. The Fund’s investment in a private investment company is valued at net asset value as provided by the private fund’s administrator. This use of net asset value as the practical expedient to approximate fair value under ASC 820 is advisable due to the investment not having a readily determinable fair value.

Introduction

The Fund is a speculative commodity pool. The market-sensitive instruments held by it are acquired for speculative trading purposes, and all or a substantial amount of the Fund’s assets are subject to the risk of trading loss. Unlike an operating company, the risk of market sensitive instruments is integral, not incidental, to the Fund’s main line of business.

Market movements result in frequent changes in the fair value of the Fund’s open positions and, consequently, in its earnings and cash flow. The Fund’s market risk is influenced by a wide variety of factors, including the level and volatility of exchange rates, interest rates, equity price levels, the market value of financial instruments and contracts, the diversification effects among the Fund’s open positions and the liquidity of the markets in which it trades.

The Fund acquires and liquidates both long and short positions in a wide range of different markets. Consequently, it is not possible to predict how a particular future market scenario will affect performance, and the Fund’s past performance cannot be relied on as indicative of its future results.

Standard of Materiality

Materiality as used in this section, “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk,” is based on an assessment of reasonably possible market movements and the potential losses caused by such movements, taking into account the leverage, and multiplier features of the Fund’s market sensitive instruments.

Quantifying the Fund’s Trading Value at Risk

The following quantitative disclosures regarding the Fund’s market risk exposures contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All quantitative disclosures in this section are deemed to be forward-looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor, except for statements of historical fact.

Value at Risk is a measure of the maximum amount which the Fund could reasonably be expected to lose in a given market sector. However, the inherent uncertainty of the Fund’s speculative trading and the recurrence in the markets traded by the Fund to market movements far exceeding expectations could result in actual trading or non-trading losses far beyond the indicated Value at Risk or the Fund’s experience to date (i.e., “risk of ruin”). Risk of ruin is defined to be no more than a 5% chance of losing 20% or more on a monthly basis. In light of the foregoing as well as the risks and uncertainties intrinsic to all future projections, the inclusion of the quantification included in this section should not be considered to constitute any assurance or representation that the Fund’s losses in any market sector will be limited to Value at Risk or by the Fund’s attempts to manage its market risk.

The Fund’s risk exposure in the various market sectors traded by the Fund’s Trading Advisors is quantified below in terms of Value at Risk. Due to mark-to-market accounting, any loss in the fair value of the Fund’s open positions is directly reflected in the Fund’s earnings.

Exchange margin requirements have been used by the Fund as the measure of its Value at Risk. Margin requirements are set by exchanges to equal or exceed the maximum losses reasonably expected to be incurred in the fair value of any given contract in 95% - 99% of any one-day interval. The margin levels are established by dealers and exchanges using historical price studies as well as an assessment of current market volatility and economic fundamentals to provide a probabilistic estimate of the maximum expected near-term one-day price fluctuation.

In the case of market sensitive instruments that are not exchange-traded (includes currencies, certain energy products and metals), the margin requirements required by the forward counterparty is used as Value at Risk.

In quantifying the Fund’s Value at Risk, 100% positive correlation in the different positions held in each market risk category has been assumed. Consequently, the margin requirements applicable to the open contracts have simply been aggregated to determine each trading category’s aggregate Value at Risk. The diversification effects resulting from the fact that the Fund’s positions are rarely, if ever, 100% positively correlated, have not been reflected.

Value at Risk as provided may not be comparable to similarly titled measures used by others.

The Fund’s Trading Value at Risk in Different Market Sectors

The following table indicates the trading Value at Risk associated with the Fund’s open positions by market sector at December 31, 2017 and 2016. All open position trading risk exposures of the Fund have been included in calculating the figures set forth below. At December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Fund’s total capitalization was $357,535,425 and $563,199,285, respectively.

Material Limitations on Value at Risk as an Assessment of Market Risk

The face value of the market sector instruments held by the Fund is typically many times the applicable margin requirement (margin requirements generally range between approximately 1% and 15% of contract face value) as well as many times the capitalization of the Fund. The magnitude of the Fund’s open positions creates a risk of ruin not typically found in most other investment vehicles. Because of the size of its positions, certain market conditions - unusual, but historically recurring from time to time - could cause the Fund to incur severe losses over a short period of time. The foregoing Value at Risk tables, as well as the past performance of the Fund gives no indication of this risk of ruin.

Non-Trading Risk

The Fund has non-trading market risk on its foreign cash balances not needed for margin. However, these balances (as well as the market risk they represent) are immaterial to the Fund as a whole. The Fund also has non-trading market risk as a result of investing a substantial portion of its available assets in U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. government sponsored enterprise notes, commercial paper, corporate notes, asset backed securities and certificates of deposit. Although these investments are considered to be high quality, some of the securities purchased are neither guaranteed by the U.S. government nor supported by the full faith and credit of the U.S. government. There is some risk that a security issuer may fail to pay the interest and principal in a timely manner, or that negative perceptions about the issuer’s ability to make such payments will cause the price of these instruments to decline in value.

Qualitative Disclosures Regarding Primary Trading Risk Exposures

The following qualitative disclosures regarding the Fund’s market risk exposures - except for those disclosures that are statements of historical fact and the descriptions of how the Fund manages its primary market risk exposures - constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, (“1933 Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (“1934 Act”). The Fund’s primary market risk exposures as well as the strategies used and to be used by the Fund’s Trading Advisors for managing such exposures are subject to numerous uncertainties, contingencies and risks, any one of which could cause the actual results of the Fund’s risk controls to differ materially from the objectives of such strategies. Government interventions, defaults and expropriations, illiquid markets, the emergence of dominant fundamental factors, political upheavals, changes in historical price relationships, an influx of new market participants, increased regulation and many other factors could result in material losses as well as in material changes to the risk exposures and the risk management strategies of the Fund. There can be no assurance that the Fund’s current market exposure and/or risk management strategies will not change materially or that any such strategies will be effective in either the short- or long-term. Investors must be prepared to lose all or substantially all of their investment in the Fund.

The following were the primary trading risk exposures of the Fund as of December 31, 2017,2021, by market sector.