Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K

(Mark One)
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20172022
OR
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from to 
Commission file: numberfile number: 001-34028
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware51-0063696
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
1025 Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees, NJ
08043
(Address of principal executive offices)(Zip Code)
1 Water Street, Camden, NJ 08102-1658
(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)
(856) 346-8200955-4001
(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each classTrading SymbolName of each exchange on which registered
Common stock, par value $0.01 per shareAWKNew York Stock Exchange Inc.
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.     Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes      No  
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.:
Large accelerated filerAccelerated filer
Non-accelerated filer
  (do not check if a smaller reporting company)Smaller reporting company
Emerging growth company
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.
If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements.
Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b).
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).    Yes      No  
State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter.
Common Stock, $0.01 par value—$12,477,500,00025,487,300,000 as of June 30, 20172022 (solely for purposes of calculating this aggregate market value, American Water has defined its affiliates to include (i) those persons who were, as of June 30, 2017,2022, its executive officers, directors or known beneficial owners of more than 10% of its common stock, and (ii) such other persons who were deemed, as of June 30, 2017,2022, to be controlled by, or under common control with, American Water or any of thesuch persons described in clause (i) above).
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: Common Stock, $0.01 par value per share—178,551,923181,858,619 shares as of February 15, 2018.January 31, 2023.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of the American Water Works Company, Inc. definitive proxy statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of StockholdersShareholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days after December 31, 20172022 are incorporated by reference into Part III of this report.






TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page
Item 1.
Item 1A.
Item 1B.
Item 2.
Item 3.
Item 4.
Item 5.
Item 6.
Item 7.
Item 7A.
Item 8.
Item 9.
Item 9A.
Item 9B.
Item 9C.
Item 10.
Item 11.
Item 12.
Item 13.
Item 14.
Item 15.
Item 16.






Table of Contents
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
We have made statementsStatements included in Item 1—Business, Item 1A—Risk Factors, and Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, and in other sections of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, or incorporated certain statements by reference into this Form 10-K, thattherein, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In some cases, these forward-looking statements can be identified by words with prospective meanings such as “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “predict,” “project,” “propose,” “assume,” “forecast,” “likely,” “uncertain,” “outlook,” “future,” “pending,” “goal,” “objective,” “potential,” “continue,” “seek to,” “may,” “can,” “should,” “will” and “could” or the negative of such terms or other variations or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements may relate to, among other things, ourthings: the Company’s future financial performance, including our operationliquidity and maintenance (“O&M”) efficiency ratio, cash flows, our growthflows; the timing and portfolio optimization strategies, our projected capital expendituresamount of rate and related funding requirements, our ability to repay debt, our projected strategy to finance current operations and growth initiatives, the impact of legal proceedings and potential fines and penalties, business process and technology improvement initiatives, trends in our industry, regulatory, legislative, tax policy or legal developments or raterevenue adjustments, including through general rate case filings, filings for infrastructure surcharges and other governmental agency authorizations and proceedings, and filings to address regulatory lag.lag; the Company’s growth and portfolio optimization strategies, including the timing and outcome of pending or future acquisition activity; the ability of the Company’s California subsidiary to obtain adequate alternative water supplies in lieu of diversions from the Carmel River; the amount and allocation of projected capital expenditures and related funding requirements; the Company’s ability to repay or refinance debt; the future impacts of increased or increasing financing costs, inflation and interest rates; the Company’s ability to execute its current and long-term business, operational and capital expenditures strategies; the Company’s ability to finance current operations, capital expenditures and growth initiatives by accessing the debt and equity capital markets; the outcome and impact on the Company of governmental and regulatory proceedings and related potential fines, penalties and other sanctions; the ability to meet or exceed the Company’s stated environmental and sustainability goals, including its greenhouse gas (“GHG”) emission reduction, water delivery efficiency and water system resiliency goals; the ability to complete, and the timing and efficacy of, the design, development, implementation and improvement of technology and other strategic initiatives; the impacts to the Company of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic; the ability to capitalize on existing or future utility privatization opportunities; trends in the water and wastewater industries in which the Company operates, including macro trends with respect to the Company’s efforts related to customer, technology and work execution; regulatory, legislative, tax policy or legal developments; and impacts that future significant tax legislation may have on the Company and on its business, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Forward-looking statements are predictions based on ourthe Company’s current expectations and assumptions regarding future events. They are not guarantees or assurances of any outcomes, financial results, or levels of activity, performance or achievements, and youreaders are cautioned not to place undue reliance upon them. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of estimates, and assumptions, and known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors. OurThe Company’s actual results may vary materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements included herein as a result of the factors discussed under Item 1A—Risk Factors, and the following important factors:
the decisions of governmental and regulatory bodies, including decisions to raise or lower customer rates;
the timeliness and outcome of regulatory commissions’ and other authorities’ actions concerning rates, capital structure, authorized return on equity, capital investment, system acquisitions and dispositions, taxes, permitting, water supply and management, and other decisions;
changes in customer demand for, and patterns of use of, water and energy, such as may result from conservation efforts;efforts, or otherwise;
limitations on the availability of ourthe Company’s water supplies or sources of water, or restrictions on ourits use thereof, resulting from allocation rights, governmental or regulatory requirements and restrictions, drought, overuse or other factors;
a loss of one or more large industrial or commercial customers due to adverse economic conditions, or other factors;
changes in laws, governmental regulations and policies, including with respect to environmental, health and safety, data and consumer privacy, security and protection, water quality and water quality accountability, contaminants of emerging contaminants,concern, public utility and tax regulations and policies, and impacts resulting from U.S., state and local elections;elections and changes in federal, state and local executive administrations;
the Company’s ability to collect, distribute, use, secure and store consumer data in compliance with current or future governmental laws, regulations and policies with respect to data and consumer privacy, security and protection;
weather conditions and events, climate variability patterns, and natural disasters, including drought or abnormally high rainfall, prolonged and abnormal ice or freezing conditions, strong winds, coastal and intercoastal flooding, pandemics (including COVID-19) and epidemics, earthquakes, landslides, hurricanes, tornadoes, wildfires, electrical storms, sinkholes and solar flares;
the outcome of litigation and similar governmental and regulatory proceedings, investigations or actions, including matters related to actions;


1

Table of Contents
the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginiarisks associated with the Company’s aging infrastructure, and the preliminarily approved global class action settlement agreement related to this chemical spill;
ourits ability to appropriately improve the resiliency of or maintain and replace, current or future infrastructure and systems, including our operationalits technology and information technology (“IT”) systems,other assets, and manage the expansion of our business;its businesses;
exposure or infiltration of ourthe Company’s technology and critical infrastructure operational technology and IT systems, including the disclosure of sensitive, personal or confidential information contained therein, through physical or cyber attacks or other means;
ourthe Company’s ability to obtain permits and other approvals for projects;projects and construction of various water and wastewater facilities;
changes in ourthe Company’s capital requirements;
ourthe Company’s ability to control operating expenses and to achieve efficiencies in our operations;operating efficiencies;
the intentional or unintentional actions of a third party, including contamination of ourthe Company’s water supplies or the water provided to ourits customers;
ourthe Company’s ability to obtain and have delivered adequate and cost-effective supplies of pipe, equipment (including personal protective equipment), chemicals, electricity,power and other fuel, water and other raw materials, and to address or mitigate supply chain constraints that may result in delays or shortages in, as well as increased costs of, supplies, products and materials that are needed for ourcritical to or used in the Company’s business operations;
ourthe Company’s ability to successfully meet its operational growth projections, for our businesseither individually or in the aggregate, and capitalize on growth opportunities, including, our ability to, among other things, acquirewith respect to:
acquiring, closing and integrate water and wastewater systemssuccessfully integrating regulated operations;
the Company’s Military Services Group (“MSG”) entering into our regulated operations, and enter intonew military installation contracts, price redeterminations, and other agreements and contracts, with or otherwise obtain,the U.S. government; and
realizing anticipated benefits and synergies from new customersacquisitions;
risks and uncertainties following the completion of the sale of the Company’s Homeowner Services Group (“HOS”), including:
the Company’s ability to receive any contingent consideration provided for in our market-based businesses;the HOS sale, as well as amounts due, payable and owing to the Company under the seller note when due; and
the ability of the Company to redeploy successfully and timely the net proceeds of this transaction into the Company’s Regulated Businesses;
risks and uncertainties associated with contracting with the U.S. government, including ongoing compliance with applicable government procurement and security regulations;

cost overruns relating to improvements in or the expansion of ourthe Company’s operations;
ourthe Company’s ability to successfully develop and implement new technologies and to protect related intellectual property;
the Company’s ability to maintain safe work sites;
ourthe Company’s exposure to liabilities related to environmental laws and similar matters resulting from, among other things, water and wastewater service provided to customers,customers;
the ability of energy providers, state governments and other third parties to achieve or fulfill their GHG emission reduction goals, including for example, our water servicewithout limitation through stated renewable portfolio standards and management solutions that are focused on customers in the natural gas exploration and production market;carbon transition plans;
changes in general economic, political, business and financial market conditions;
access to sufficient debt and/or equity capital on satisfactory terms and when and as needed to support operations and capital expenditures;
fluctuations in inflation or interest rates;rates, and the Company’s ability to address or mitigate the impacts thereof;
restrictivethe ability to comply with affirmative or negative covenants in or changes to the credit ratings on us or our current or future debt thatindebtedness of the Company or any of its subsidiaries, or the issuance of new or modified credit ratings or outlooks by credit rating agencies with respect to the Company or any of its subsidiaries (or any current or future indebtedness thereof), which could increase our financing costs or funding requirements and affect the Company’s or affect ourits subsidiaries’ ability to borrow,issue, repay or redeem debt, pay dividends or make payments on debt or pay dividends;distributions;
fluctuations in the value of, or assumptions and estimates related to, its benefit plan assets and liabilities, including with respect to its pension and other post-retirement benefit plans, that could increase our costexpenses and plan funding


2

Table of Contents
requirements;
changes in federal or state general, income and other tax laws, including any further rules, regulations, interpretations(i) future significant tax legislation, and guidance by the U.S. Department of the Treasury and state or local taxing authorities (collectively, the “Related Interpretations”) related to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”),(ii) the availability of, or the Company’s compliance with, the terms of applicable tax credits and tax abatement programs, and our ability to utilize our U.S. federal and state income tax net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards;programs;
migration of customers into or out of ourthe Company’s service territories;territories and changes in water and energy consumption resulting therefrom;
the use by municipalities of the power of eminent domain or other authority to condemn ourthe systems of one or more of the Company’s utility subsidiaries, or the assertion by private landowners of similar rights against us;such utility subsidiaries;
any difficulty or inability to obtain insurance ourfor the Company, its inability to obtain insurance at acceptable rates and on acceptable terms and conditions, or ourits inability to obtain reimbursement under existing or future insurance programs and coverages for any losses sustained;
the incurrence of impairment charges, changes in fair value and other adjustments related to ourthe Company’s goodwill or the value of its other assets;
labor actions, including work stoppages and strikes;
the Company’s ability to retain and attract highly qualified employees;and skilled employees and/or diverse talent;
civil disturbances or unrest, or terrorist threats or acts, or public apprehension about future disturbances, unrest, or terrorist threats or acts; and
the impact of new, and changes to existing, accounting standards.
These forward-looking statements are qualified by, and should be read together with, the risks and uncertainties set forth above and the risk factors included in Item 1A—Risk Factors and other statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and youreaders should refer to such risks, uncertainties and risk factors in evaluating such forward-looking statements. Any forward-looking statements we makethe Company makes shall speak only as of the date this Annual Report on Form 10-K was filed with the United StatesU.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Except as required by the federal securities laws, we dothe Company does not have any obligation, and weit specifically disclaimdisclaims any undertaking or intention, to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events, changed circumstances or otherwise. New factors emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for usthe Company to predict all such factors. Furthermore, it may not be possible to assess the impact of any such factor on ourthe Company’s businesses, either viewed independently or together, or the extent to which any factor, or combination of factors, may cause results to differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statement. The foregoing factors should not be construed as exhaustive.





3


Table of Contents
PART I
ITEM 1.BUSINESS
OurITEM 1.    BUSINESS
The Company
With a history dating back to 1886, American Water is the largest and most geographically diverse, publicly-traded water and wastewater utility company in the United States, as measured by both operating revenues and population served. A holding company originally incorporated in Delaware in 1936, we employthe Company employs approximately 6,9006,500 professionals who provide drinking water, wastewater and other related services to an estimated 15over 14 million people in 46 states,24 states. The Company conducts the Districtmajority of Columbia and Ontario, Canada. The largest component of the Company’sits business includes ratethrough regulated subsidiariesutilities that provide water and wastewater services, collectively presented as ourthe “Regulated Businesses.” We conduct the majority of our business through the Regulated Businesses segment. WeThe Company also operate severaloperates other market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within four operating segments that individuallyto the U.S. government on military installations, as well as municipalities. Individually, these market-based businesses do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). These four, non-reportable operating segments, and are collectively presented as our “Market-Based Businesses,throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K within “Other,” which is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses.
On December 9, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), the Company sold all of the equity interests of the HOS subsidiaries. See Item 1—Business—Other—Sale of Homeowner Services Group below and Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
On January 1, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its New York subsidiary, see Item 1—Business—Regulated Businesses—Sale of New York American Water Company, Inc. below and Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K, (this “Form 10-K”), unless the context otherwise requires, references to “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company,” and “American Water” mean American Water Works Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries, taken together as a whole. References to “parent company” mean American Water Works Company, Inc., without its subsidiaries.
Regulated Businesses
OurThe Company’s primary business involves the ownership of utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential, commercial, industrial, public authority, fire service and sale for resale customers. OurThe Company’s utilities operate in approximately 1,600 communities in 1614 states in the United States, with approximately 3.4 million active customer connections to ourcustomers in its water and wastewater networks. Services provided by ourthe Company’s utilities are generally subject to economic regulation by certainmultiple state utility commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation, collectively referred to as Public Utility Commissionspublic utility commissions (“PUCs” or “Regulators”). Certain federal,Federal, state and local governments also regulate environmental, health and safety, and water quality and water accountability matters. We reportThe Company reports the results of the services provided by ourits utilities in ourthe Regulated Businesses segment. Operating revenues for ourthe Regulated Businesses were $2,958$3,505 million for 2017, $2,8712022, $3,384 million for 20162021 and $2,743$3,255 million for 2015,2020, accounting for 88%92%, 87%86% and 87%86%, respectively, of the Company’s total operating revenues for the same periods.
The followingPresented in the table geographically summarizes ourbelow is a geographic summary of the Regulated Businesses’ operating revenues and the number of customers we servethe Company serves, by type of service, eachfor and as of and for the year ended December 31, 2017:2022:
Operating Revenues (in millions)Number of Customers (in thousands)
 Water (a)WastewaterTotal% of TotalWaterWastewaterTotal% of Total
New Jersey$858 $51 $909 25.9 %663 59 722 20.9 %
Pennsylvania714 105 819 23.4 %679 97 776 22.5 %
Missouri367 16 383 10.9 %480 22 502 14.6 %
Illinois310 39 349 10.0 %297 71 368 10.7 %
California281 285 8.1 %189 192 5.6 %
Total—Top Five States (b)
2,530 215 2,745 78.3 %2,308 252 2,560 74.2 %
Other (c)
733 27 760 21.7 %853 36 889 25.8 %
Total Regulated Businesses$3,263 $242 $3,505 100.0 %3,161 288 3,449 100.0 %
 Operating Revenues (In millions) Number of Customers (In thousands)
 Water (a) Wastewater Total % of Total Water Wastewater Total % of Total
New Jersey$698
 $41
 $739
 25.0% 639
 48
 687
 20.5%
Pennsylvania617
 44
 661
 22.3% 658
 64
 722
 21.5%
Illinois284
 20
 304
 10.3% 284
 33
 317
 9.5%
Missouri280
 9
 289
 9.8% 466
 13
 479
 14.3%
Indiana222
 
 222
 7.5% 302
 
 302
 9.0%
California219
 3
 222
 7.5% 175
 3
 178
 5.3%
West Virginia143
 1
 144
 4.9% 166
 1
 167
 5.0%
Total - Top Seven States (b)
2,463
 118
 2,581
 87.3% 2,690
 162
 2,852
 85.1%
Other states (c)
353
 24
 377
 12.7% 470
 31
 501
 14.9%
Total Regulated Businesses$2,816
 $142
 $2,958
 100.0% 3,160
 193
 3,353
 100.0%
(a)Includes Other(a)Includes other operating revenues consisting primarily of miscellaneous utility charges, fees miscellaneous service charges and rents.
(b)Our “Top Seven States” are determined based upon operating revenues.
(c)Includes our utilities in the following states: Georgia, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Michigan, New York, Tennessee and Virginia.
See Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Note 19—Segment Informationrents.
(b)The Company’s “Top Five States” are determined based upon operating revenues.
(c)Includes the Company’s utility operations in the Notesfollowing states: Georgia, Hawaii, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia and other revenue attributable collectively to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.the Regulated Businesses. The Company completed the sale of its New York subsidiary on January 1, 2022 and the sale of its Michigan subsidiary on February 4, 2022.



4

Table of Contents
Customers
OurThe Company’s Regulated Businesses have a large and geographically diverse customer base. A customer is defined as a person, business, municipality or any other entity that purchases ourthe Company’s water or wastewater services as of the last business day of a reporting period. One single customer may purchase ourthe Company’s services for use by multiple individuals or businesses, as is the case in manybusinesses. Examples of these customers are homes, apartment complexes, businesses and governmental entities.
The vast majority of ourthe Company’s regulated water customers are metered, which allows usthe Company to measure and bill for ourits customers’ water usage, typically on a monthly basis. We employThe Company employs a variety of methods of customer meter reading to monitor consumption. These methods range from meters with mechanical registers where consumption is manually recorded by meter readers, to meters with electronic registers capable of transmitting consumption data to proximity devices (touch read) or via radio frequency to mobile or fixed network data collectors. OurThe Company’s wastewater customers are billed either a flat rate or based upon their water consumption.
Residential customers make up a substantial portion of ourthe Company’s customer base in all of the states in which we operate. Weit operates. The Company also serve:serves (i) commercial customers, such as hospitals, food and beverage providers, commercial property developers and proprietors, and energy suppliers;suppliers, (ii) industrialfire service customers, such as large-scale manufacturers, mining and production operations; and (iii) public authorities, such as government buildings and other public sector facilities, including schools. In addition, we supplywhere the Company supplies water through ourits distribution systems to public fire hydrants for firefighting purposes and to private fire customers for use in fire suppression systems in office buildings and other facilities, (iii) industrial customers, such as large-scale manufacturers, mining and toproduction operations, (iv) public authorities, such as government buildings and other waterpublic sector facilities, including schools and universities, and (v) other utilities and community water and wastewater systems in the form of bulk contracts for the supply of water suppliesor the treatment of wastewater for distribution to their own customers.
The following chart depicts the allocation of ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses’ operating revenue of $3,505 million by type, including a breakout of the total water services revenues by class of customer, for the year ended December 31, 2017:2022:
awk-20221231_g1.jpg

(a)Includes water revenues from public authorities and other utilities and community water systems under bulk contracts.
The following(b)Includes other operating revenues consisting primarily of miscellaneous utility charges, fees and rents.


5

Table of Contents
Presented in the table summarizesbelow is the number of water and wastewater customers wethe Company served by class as of December 31:31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, which represents approximately 14 million people served as of December 31, 2022:
 202220212020
(In thousands)WaterWastewaterWaterWastewaterWaterWastewater
Residential2,870 270 2,972 245 2,948 236 
Commercial219 17 225 15 225 15 
Fire service51 — 52 — 50 — 
Industrial— — — 
Public and other (a)17 16 17 
Total (b)3,161 288 3,269 261 3,244 252 
 2017 2016 2015
(In thousands)Water Wastewater (a) Water Wastewater Water Wastewater
Residential2,872
 182
 2,846
 171
 2,829
 133
Commercial221
 11
 220
 10
 219
 8
Industrial4
 
 4
 
 4
 
Public & other63
 
 61
 
 60
 
Total3,160
 193
 3,131
 181
 3,112
 141
(a)    Includes public authorities and other utilities and community water and wastewater systems under bulk contracts. Bulk contracts, which are accounted for as a single customer in the table above, generally result in service to multiple customers.
(a)In 2017, we acquired substantially all of the wastewater collection and treatment system assets of the Municipal Authority of the City of McKeesport, Pennsylvania (the “McKeesport system”). This acquisition included approximately 22,000 customer equivalents in total; comprised of 11,000 customer connections, which are reflected in the 2017 residential customer count in the table above, as well as service to an additional 11,000 customers under bulk contracts to 13 municipalities in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania.
(b)The Company completed the sale of its New York subsidiary on January 1, 2022 and the sale of its Michigan subsidiary on February 4, 2022.
Customer growth in ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses is primarily driven by:from (i) adding new customers to ourits customer base through acquisitions of water and/or wastewater utility systems;systems, (ii) organic population growth (or decline) in ourits authorized service areas;areas, and (iii) sale of water to other water utilities and community water systems.
Capital Investment
On an annual basis, approximately 2 trillion gallons of treated water are lost in the United States through more than 240,000 main breaks at an estimated cost of $2.6 billion. This represents approximately 20% of all treated water in the country. In addition, every year approximately 900 billion gallons of untreated sewage is discharged into the country’s rivers and streams. The aging water and wastewater infrastructure in the United States is in need of replacement and modernization. In 2017, the American Society of Civil Engineers published its Report Card for America’s Infrastructure, in which it gave the drinking water industry a grade of “D” and the wastewater infrastructure a grade of “D+,” primarily because much of the infrastructure is nearing the end of its useful life. As documented in the American Water Works Association’s (the “AWWA”) Buried No Longer: Confronting America’s Water Infrastructure Challenge, restoring the country’s existing water systems as they reach the end of their useful lives and expanding them to serve a growing population will cost at least $1 trillion between 2011 and 2035, if we are to maintain current levels of water service. In addition, increased regulation related to water quality and the management of water and wastewater residuals’ discharges, which began with the passage of the Clean Water Act in 1972 and the Safe Drinking Water Act in 1974, is also a primary driver for the need to modernize.
To address the growing infrastructure needs in the areas we serve, we planCompany plans to invest $7.2between $30 billion and $34 billion over the next five10 years including a range of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion in 2018, for capital improvements, including acquisitions, to ourits Regulated Businesses’ water and wastewater infrastructure, largely aimed for pipe replacement and upgrading aging water and wastewater treatment facilities. We haveThe Company has proactively doubled ourimproved its pipe renewal rate over a five year period, from 2011 to 2016, from a 250 year250-year replacement cycle in 2009 to a 120 yearan expected 110-year replacement cycle by 2027, which we anticipateit anticipates will enable usthe Company to replace nearly 2,0002,100 miles of mains and collection pipes over the next five years.between 2023 and 2027. In addition, during this same five year period,from 2023 to 2027, the Company’s capital investment in treatment plants, storage tanks and other key, above-ground facilities has increased over 10%,is expected to increase, further addressing agingseeking to address infrastructure renewal, resiliency, water quality, operational efficiency, technology and innovation, and emerging regulatory compliance needs. Additionally, the Company continues to invest significantly in resiliency projects to address the impacts of climate and weather variability by hardening its assets.
Economic Regulation and Rate Making
Our Regulated Businesses operate under a regulatory compact whereby, in exchange for exclusive rights to provide water and wastewater services in defined service territories, we have an obligation to serve customers within those territories requesting service, within reasonable limits. In return for agreeing to invest capital into our water and wastewater systems, we are given the opportunity to recover our costs of doing business and earn a reasonable rate of return on our investments.
The operations of ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses are generally subject to economic regulation by PUCs in the statestates in which they operate, with the primary responsibility of the PUCs to promotebeing the promotion of the overall public interest by balancing the interest of customers and utility investors. Specific authority might differ from state to state, but in most states, PUCs review and approve rates charged to customers, accounting treatments, long-term financing programs and cost of capital, operation and maintenance (“O&M”) expenses, capital expenditures, O&M expenses, taxes, affiliated transactions and affiliate relationships, reorganizations, and mergers and acquisitions.acquisitions, and dispositions, along with imposing certain penalties or granting certain incentives. Regulatory policies vary from state to state and could potentiallycan change over time. These policies will affect the timing, as well as the extent, of recovery of expenses and the realized return on invested capital.

The process to obtain approval for a changePeriodic changes in customer rates generally occurs by wayoccur through the filing of a rate case filed by the utility with the PUC on a periodic basis.PUC. The timing of rate case filings is typically determined by either periodic requirements in the regulatory jurisdiction or by the utility’s need to increase its revenue requirement to recover capital investment costs, changes in operating revenues, operating costs or other market conditions. Our rate case management program is guided by the principles of obtaining timely recovery of capital investment costs, recognition of declining sales resulting from reduced consumption and appropriate recovery of utility operating and maintenance costs, including costs incurred for compliance with environmental regulations. The programCompany attempts to minimize “regulatory lag,” which is the time between the occurrence of an event that triggers a change in the utility’s revenue requirement and its recognition in rates. It is, for example, the time between when an investment in plant is placed into service for the benefit of the customer and when the Company can begin earning a return of and on the investment through the ratemaking process. It also applies to the lag in the recognition in rate recoveryrates of changes in expenses and revenues.that change.
Our


6

Table of Contents
The Company’s Regulated Businesses support regulatory practices at the PUCs and state legislatures that mitigate the adverse impact of regulatory lag. ExamplesPresented in the table below are examples of approved regulatory practices include:
practices:
Regulatory PracticesDescriptionStates Allowed
Infrastructure replacement surchargessurcharge mechanismsAllows rates to change periodically, outside a general rate case proceeding, to reflect recovery of capital investments made to replace infrastructure necessary to sustain safe and reliable services for ourthe Company’s customers. These mechanisms typically involve periodic filings and reviews to ensure transparency.IA, IL, IN, KY, MO, NJ, NY, PA, TN, VA, WV
Future test yearA test“test year” is a period used for setting rates, that begins withand a future test year describes the datefirst 12 months that new rates are proposed to be effective. ThisThe use of a future test year allows current or projected revenues, expenses and capital investments to be collected on a timeliermore timely basis.CA, HI, IA, IL, IN, KY, NY, PA, TN, VA
Hybrid test yearAllowsA historical test year sets rates using data from a 12-month period that ends prior to a general rate case filing. A hybrid test year allows an update to historical data for “known and measurable” changes that occur subsequent to the historical test year.IA, MD, MO, NJ, WV
Utility plant recovery mechanismsAllows recovery of the full return on utility plant costs during the construction period, instead of capitalizing an allowance for funds used during construction.construction (“AFUDC”). In addition, some states allow the utility to seek pre-approval of certain capital projects and associated costs. In this pre-approval process, the PUC may assess the prudency of such projects.CA, IL, KY, NY, PA, TN, VA
Expense mechanismsAllows changes in certain operating expenses, which may fluctuate based on conditions beyond the utility’s control, to be recovered outside of a general rate case proceeding or deferred until the next general rate case proceeding.CA, HI, IL, IN, MD, MO, NJ, NY, PA, TN, VA WV
Revenue stability mechanismsSeparates a water utility’s cost recovery from the amount of water it sells to recover its fixed costs and on-going infrastructure investment needs. Such a mechanism adjustsAdjusts rates periodically to ensure that a utility’s revenue will be sufficient to coverutility recovers the revenues authorized in its costsgeneral rate case, regardless of sales volume, including recognition of declining sales resulting from reduced consumption, while providing an incentive for customers to use water more efficiently.CA, IL NY
Consolidated tariffsUse of a unified rate structure for water systems owned and operated by a single utility, which may or may not be physically interconnected. The consolidated tariff pricing structure may be used fully or partially in a state, and is generally used to prioritize capital investments and moderate the price impact of periodic fluctuations in local costs, while lowering administrative costs for customers. Pennsylvania and West Virginia also permitspermit a blending of water and wastewater revenue requirements.CA, IA, IL, IN, KY, MD, MO, NJ, PA, VA, WV
Deferred accountingA regulator’s willingness to defer recognition of financial impacts when setting rates for utilities.All
We pursue or seek enhancementThe Company pursues enhancements to these regulatory practices to facilitate efficient recovery of ourits costs and capital investments in orderand to continue to provide safe, clean, reliable and affordable services to ourits customers. The ability to seek regulatory treatment asusing the regulatory practices described above does not guarantee that the state PUCs will accept ourthe Company’s proposal in the context of a particular rate case, and these regulatory practices may reduce, but not eliminate, regulatory lag associated with traditional rate making processes. It is also ourthe Company’s strategy to expand theirthe use of these mechanisms in areas where they may not currently apply.

apply and enhance certain mechanisms where they already exist.
Acquisitions and Strategic Growth
The U.S. water and wastewater industries include investor-owned systems as well as municipal systems that are owned and operated by local governments or governmental subdivisions. Both industries are highly fragmented. According to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”), as of 2017, approximately 84% of the United States water market is served by municipal systems and approximately 98% of the country’s wastewater systems are government owned. The EPA also estimates, as of 2017, that there are approximatelyover 50,000 community water systems and approximately 20,000over 15,000 community wastewater systems in the United States, with over halfapproximately 80% of the community water systems serving a population of 5003,000 or less. This large number of relatively small, fragmented water and wastewater systems may result in inefficiencies in the marketplace, since such utilities may not have the operating expertise, financial and technological capability or economies of scale to provide services or raise capital as efficiently as larger utilities. Larger utilities that have greater access to capital are generally more capable of making mandated and other necessary infrastructure upgrades to their water and wastewater systems. In addition, water and wastewater utilities with large customer bases, spread across broad geographic regions, may more easily absorb the impact of significant variations in precipitation and temperatures, such as droughts, excessive rain and cool or warm temperatures in specific areas. Larger utilities generally are able to spread support services over a larger customer base, thereby reducing the costs to serve each customer. Since many administrative and support activities can be efficiently centralized to gain economies of scale, companies that participate in industry consolidation have the potential to improve operating efficiencies, lower costs per unit and improve service at the same time.
A fundamental aspect of ourthe Company’s growth strategy is to pursue acquisitions of small and medium water and/or wastewater systems of between 1,000 and 30,000 customer connections, in close geographic proximity to areas where we operate ourthe Company operates its Regulated Businesses.Businesses, see Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations for additional information. The close proximity of acquisition opportunities to ourthe Company’s regulated footprint allows usit to integrate and manage the acquired systems and operations primarily using ourthe Company’s existing management (although the Company typically retains the majority, if not all, of the employees of the acquired systems) and to achieve operational efficiencies and prioritize capital investment needs. OurThe Company’s current customer mix of 94%92% water and 6%8% wastewater also presents strategic opportunities for wastewater growth and systems consolidation, addingallowing the Company to add wastewater customers where weit already serveserves water customers. We intendThe Company intends to continue to expand ourits regulated footprint geographically by acquiring water and wastewater systems in ourits existing markets and, if appropriate, pursuepursuing acquisition opportunities in certain domestic markets where we dothe Company does not currently operate ourits Regulated Businesses. Before entering new regulated markets, wethe Company will evaluate the business and regulatory climates to ensure that weit will have the opportunity to achieve an appropriate rate of return on ourits investment while maintaining ourits high standards for providing safe, reliable and affordable services to our customers, as well asits customers. The Company will also evaluate whether there is a line of sight to grow our base customers to sufficient scale in a significant level tonew regulated market so that it can attain efficiencies after entering thea new domestic market.
MoreIncreasingly stringent environmental, health and safety, cybersecurity and water quality and water accountability regulations, the amount of infrastructure in need of significant capital investment, and financial challenges and industry legislation are drivingseveral elements, among others, that may drive more municipalities to consider selling their water and wastewater assets. For example,


7

Table of Contents
Sale of New York American Water Company, Inc.
On January 1, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its New York subsidiary to Liberty Utilities (Eastern Water Holdings) Corp. (“Liberty”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. Under the terms of the Stock Purchase Agreement, dated November 20, 2019, as amended, by and among the Company, the Company’s New York subsidiary and Liberty (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”), Liberty purchased from the Company all of the capital stock of the Company’s New York subsidiary for a purchase price of $608 million in 2015,cash. The sale was approved by the New Jersey enactedYork State Department of Public Service on December 16, 2021. The Company’s regulated New York operations had approximately 127,000 customers in the State of New York. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Industry Legislation
On November 15, 2021, the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act (the “IIJA”) was signed into law and provides for up to $55 billion to aid in improving the country’s ailing water infrastructure, including $23.4 billion for drinking water and wastewater, $15 billion for lead service line replacement (through the drinking water state revolving fund), and $10 billion for the treatment of per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (“PFAS”) and other contaminants of emerging concern. The IIJA also included a low-income assistance program, in which eligible low-income customers who receive their water from public and private entities may participate. The Company has leveraged these funds throughout its service areas to benefit its customers.
In December 2020, Congress passed, and the President signed into law, a $900 billion COVID-19 relief and $1.4 trillion U.S. government appropriations package for 2021, which included $638 million for a low-income water assistance program and $2.8 billion for capitalization grants under the Clean Water Infrastructure Protection Act, which allows municipalities with a water or wastewater system that meets certain emergent conditions, to allow it to sell the system on an expedited basis without a referendum. Also, inand Drinking Water state revolving funds.
In 2017, New Jersey enacted the Water Quality Accountability Act (the “WQAA”), which sets new operational standards for all water utilities in New Jersey, including municipal and investor-owned utilities.utilities with more than 500 service connections. This law imposes new requirements in areas such as cybersecurity, asset management, water quality reporting, remediation of notices of violation, and hydrant and valve maintenance. The WQAA requires the most senior water manager, or either the executive director for municipal utility authorities or the mayor or chief executive officer for municipally owned public water systems, to certify that the system meets the requirements under the WQAA. Enhanced WQAA legislation includes additional enforcement requirements for disclosure of results, requires the sale of systems for prolonged violations and imposes new cybersecurity requirements and asset management plans. The new amendments, which provide for both civil and criminal penalties for falsification of documents, were signed by the Governor with an effective date of November 8, 2021.
We also supportIn 2018, Indiana passed a law to set minimum operational expectations for all water and wastewater utilities in the state, including municipal and investor-owned utilities. The law requires water and wastewater utilities to conduct rate analyses, develop capital asset management plans and conduct cybersecurity and water loss audits.
In 2020, Missouri enacted the Water Safety and Security Act, which requires small and medium-sized water providers to create cybersecurity, valve inspection and hydrant inspection programs.
The Company’s regulated subsidiaries in California, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia have access to utility valuation legislation and regulation for private sector investment in public sector water and wastewater systems. The Company supports full optionality for municipalities, including state legislation that enables the consolidation of the largely fragmented water and wastewater industries through third-party fair market valuations of purchased property and the consolidation of water and wastewater rates. Our Regulated Businesses in California, Illinois, Indiana, Missouri, New Jersey and Pennsylvania have access to fair market value legislation for private sector investment in public sector systems.property. Fair market value assessment of water and wastewater systems is an alternative to the traditional depreciated original cost method of valuation, providingwhich allows the Company to offer municipalities with a fair and objective purchase price for their system assets that is more reflective of the assets’ fair market value, while providing the utility hasCompany with increased assurance of recovering investmentopportunity to recover the purchase price over the life of the assets. Ultimately, we believepurchased system assets, subject to PUC approval. In 2021, the Tennessee Public Utility Commission implemented acquisition valuation rules that many communities could benefit from receiving safe and reliableinclude a methodology to value water and wastewater service from an experienced utility with proven accessassets based upon the new replacement cost of the assets less the depreciation, in addition to capital and financial, technical, and managerial resources.other valuation methodology options.
Consolidated tariffs use a unified rate structure for systems owned and operated by a single utility, which may or may not be physically interconnected. Consolidated tariff pricing moderates the impact of periodic fluctuations in local costs and promotes a more universal water infrastructure investment in the state.a jurisdiction. As a result, consolidated tariffs can make it easier to incorporate new systems into an existing utility, and can ensuresupport economies of scale for even the smallest of systems and prioritize capital needs across the state.jurisdiction. Overall, this bringsthe Company believes that consolidated tariffs bring cost-effective, higher qualityhigh-quality services to a larger number of citizens. Tencustomers. Eleven of ourthe Company’s regulated subsidiariesjurisdictions currently have some form of consolidated tariff pricing, including California, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Virginia and West Virginia.



8

Table of Contents
Competition
In ourThe Company’s Regulated Businesses we generally do not face direct competition in ourtheir existing markets because:because (i) we operatethe Company operates in those markets pursuant to franchises, charters, certificates of public convenience and necessity (oror similar authorizations)authorizations (collectively, “CPCNs”) issued by state PUCs;PUCs or other authorities, and (ii) the high cost of constructing a new water and wastewater system in an existing market creates a highsignificant barrier to market entry. However, ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses do face competition from governmental agencies, other investor-owned utilities, large industrial customers with the ability to provide their own water supply/treatment process and strategic buyers that are entering new markets and/or making strategic acquisitions. When pursuing acquisitions, ourthe Company’s largest investor-owned competitors, based on a comparison of operating revenues and population served, are Aqua America,include Essential Utilities, Inc., Suez North America, American States Water Company and California Water Service Group. From time to time, wethe Company also facefaces competition from infrastructure funds, multi-utility companies and others, such as Algonquin Power and Utilities Corp., Eversource Energy, SouthWest Water Company and Corix.Corix Infrastructure, Inc.
Condemnation and Eminent Domain
All or portions of ourthe Regulated Businesses’ utility assets could be acquired by state, municipal or other government entities through one or more of the following methods: (i) eminent domain (also known as condemnation); (ii) the right of purchase given or reserved by a municipality or political subdivision when the original certificate of public convenience and necessityCPCN was granted; and (iii) the right of purchase given or reserved under the law of the state in which the utility subsidiary was incorporated or from which it received its certificate.CPCN. The acquisition consideration related to such a proceeding initiated by a local government may be determined consistent with applicable eminent domain law, or may be negotiated or fixed by appraisers as prescribed by the law of the state or the jurisdiction of the particular CPCN.
As such, the Regulated Businesses are periodically subject to condemnation proceedings in the particular franchise or charter.ordinary course of business. For example, the Monterey water service system assets (the “Monterey system assets”) of the Company’s California subsidiary (“Cal Am”) are the subject of a potential condemnation action by the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (the “MPWMD”) stemming from a November 2018 public ballot initiative. In 2019, the MPWMD issued a preliminary valuation and cost of service analysis report, finding in part that (1) an estimate of the Monterey system assets’ total value plus adjustments would be approximately $513 million, (2) the cost of service modeling results indicate significant annual reductions in revenue requirements and projected monthly water bills, and (3) the acquisition of the Monterey system assets by the MPWMD would be economically feasible. In 2020, the MPWMD certified a final environmental impact report, analyzing the environmental impacts of the MPWMD’s project to (1) acquire the Monterey system assets through the power of eminent domain, if necessary, and (2) expand its geographic boundaries to include all parts of this system.
In February 2021, the MPWMD filed an application with the Local Agency Formation Commission of Monterey County (“LAFCO”) seeking approval to become a retail water provider and annex approximately 58 parcels of land into the MPWMD’s boundaries. In June 2021, LAFCO’s commissioners voted to require a third-party independent financial study as to the feasibility of an acquisition by the MPWMD of the Monterey system assets. In December 2021, LAFCO’s commissioners denied the MPWMD’s application to become a retail water provider, determining that the MPWMD does not have the authority to proceed with a condemnation of the Monterey system assets. On April 1, 2022, the MPWMD filed a lawsuit against LAFCO challenging its decision to deny the MPWMD’s application seeking approval to become a retail water provider. For more information on the lawsuit against LAFCO, see Item 3—Legal Proceedings—Proposed Acquisition of Monterey System Assets — Local Area Formation Commission Litigation. By letter dated October 3, 2022, the MPWMD notified Cal Am of a decision to appraise the Monterey system assets and requesting access to a number of Cal Am’s properties and documents to assist the MPWMD with such an appraisal. Cal Am responded by letter on October 24, 2022, denying the request for access, stating that the MPWMD does not have the right to appraise Cal Am’s system without LAFCO approval to become a retail water provider.
Also, five municipalities in the Chicago, Illinois area (approximately 30,300 customers in total) formed a water agency and filed an eminent domain lawsuit against the Company in January 2013, seeking to condemn the water pipeline that serves those five municipalities. During a valuation trial held in January 2023, the parties settled the lawsuit and the water agency dismissed the eminent domain case, and as a result the Company will retain the pipeline. As part of the dismissal, the Company’s Illinois subsidiary and another subsidiary entered into a settlement agreement with the water agency agreeing to, among other things, maintain through December 31, 2027 the utility-specific wholesale water rate passed through to customers of the pipeline, such that the rate, exclusive of other pass-through charges, remains no higher than the current rate.


9

Table of Contents
Furthermore, the law in certain jurisdictions in which ourthe Regulated Businesses operate including, for example, California, provides for eminent domain rights allowing private property owners to file a lawsuit to seek just compensation against a public utility, if a public utility’s infrastructure has been determined to be a substantial cause of damage to that property. In these actions, the plaintiff would not have to prove that the public utility acted negligently. These actionsIn California, for example, lawsuits have occurredbeen filed in connection with large-scale natural events such as floods, mudslides and debris flow, broken water mains, landslides and wild and brush fires.wildfires. Some of these lawsuits have included allegations that infrastructure of certain utilities triggered the natural event that resulted in damage to the property. In some cases, the PUC has allowed certain costs or losses incurred by the utility to be recovered from customers in rates, but in other cases such recovery in rates has been disallowed. Also, the utility may have obtained insurance that could respond to some or all of such losses, although the utility would be at risk for any losses not ultimately subject to rate or insurance recovery or losses that exceed the limits of such insurance.
Water Supply and Wastewater Services
OurThe Company’s Regulated Businesses generally own the physical assets used to store, pump, treat and deliver water to ourits customers and collect, treat, transport and recycle wastewater. Typically, we dothe Company does not own the water, itself, which is held in public trust and is allocated to usthe Company through contracts, permits and allocation rights granted by federal and state or multi-state agencies or through the ownership of water rights pursuant to local law. We areThe Company is dependent on defined sources of water supply and obtain ourobtains its water supply from surface water sources such as reservoirs, lakes, rivers and streams; from groundwater sources, such as wells and aquifers; and water purchased from third partythird-party water suppliers. The level of water treatment we apply to the waterCompany applies varies significantly depending upon the quality of the water source and customer stipulations. Surface water sources typically generally require significant treatment, while groundwater sources often require chemical treatment only.

The followingPresented in the chart depicts ourbelow are the Company’s sources of water supply as of December 31, 2017:2022:
awk-20221231_g2.jpg
ThePresented in the table below are the percentages of water supply by source type for our top seven statesthe Company’s Top Five States for 2017 were as follows:the year ended December 31, 2022:
 Surface WaterGround WaterPurchased Water
New Jersey74%22%4%
Pennsylvania91%7%2%
Missouri78%21%1%
Illinois54%35%11%
California68%32%


10

Table of Contents
 Surface Water Ground Water Purchased Water
New Jersey72% 24% 4%
Pennsylvania91% 7% 2%
Illinois53% 36% 11%
Missouri80% 19% 1%
Indiana44% 56% 
California 65% 35%
West Virginia100%  
OurThe Company’s ability to meet the existing and future water demands of ourits customers depends on an adequate water supply. Drought, governmental restrictions, overuse of sources of water, the protection of threatened species or habitats, contamination or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water. We employThe Company employs a variety of measures in an effort to obtain adequate sources of water supply, both in the short-term and over the long-term. The geographic diversity of ourthe Company’s service areas may mitigate some of the economic effects on the water supply associated with weather extremes wethe Company might encounter in any particular service territory. For example, in any given summer, some areas may experience drier than average weather, which may reduce the amount of source water available, while other areas we servethe Company serves may experience wetter than average weather.

In our long-term planning, we evaluateThe Company evaluates quality, quantity, growth needs and alternate sources of water supply as well as transmission and distribution capacity.capacity to provide water service to its customers. Water supply is seasonal in nature and weather conditions can have a pronounced effect on supply. In order to ensure that we havethe Company has adequate water supply, we useit uses long-term planning processes and maintainmaintains contingency plans to minimize the potential impact on service caused by climate variability and a wide range of weather fluctuations. The Company reviews current climate science and global models related to temperature, precipitation and sea level rise on an ongoing basis. Where actionable forecasts are available, the Company will use this information in its comprehensive planning studies and asset management plans. These studies and plans, which are used by the Company to develop its asset management and system reliability strategies, assess the climate risk and resiliency of the Company’s water and wastewater systems over short-, medium- and long-term time horizons, and include evaluations of the availability of water supplies and system capacity against a number of different factors, projections and estimates.
In connection with supply planning for most surface or groundwater sources, we employthe Company employs models to determine safe yields under different rainfall and drought conditions. Surface and ground water levels are routinely monitored so that supply capacity deficits may, to the extent possible, be predicted and mitigated through demand management and additional supply development. In California, where the state has been experiencing a multi-year drought, the Company utilizes multiple water supply options including numerous ground water wells in multiple aquifers as well as various long-term purchase water agreements with regional water suppliers to optimize supplies while assuring resiliency during dry years. An example of ourthe Company’s use of long-term planning to ensure that we haveit has adequate water supply is ourits involvement in the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (the “Water Supply Project”) in California. The Water Supply Project includes the construction of a desalination plant, to be owned by California-American Water Company (“Cal Am”), our wholly ownedthe Company’s California subsidiary, and the construction of wells that would supply water to the desalination plant. In addition, the Water Supply Project also includes Cal Am’sthe California subsidiary’s purchase of water from a groundwater replenishment project (the “GWR Project”) between Monterey One Water (formerly known as the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control AgencyAgency) and the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (the “MPWMD”).MPWMD. The Water Supply Project is intended, among other things, to fulfill obligations of Cal Amthe California subsidiary to eliminate unauthorized diversions from the Carmel River as required under orders of the California State Water Resources Control Board (the “SWRCB”). For more information, see Item 3—Legal Proceedings—Alternative Water Supply in Lieu of Carmel River Diversions and Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies—Contingencies—Alternative Water Supply in Lieu of Carmel River Diversions, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Wastewater services involve the collection of wastewater from customers’ premises through sewer lines. The wastewater is then transported through a sewer network to a treatment facility, where it is treated to meet required regulatory standards for wastewater before being returned to the environment. The solid waste by-product of the treatment process is disposed of or recycled in accordance with applicable standards and regulations.
Seasonality
Customer demand for ourthe Company’s water service is affected by weather and tends to vary with temperature rainfall levels and theamount and frequency of rainfall. Customer demand is generally greater during the warmer months, primarily due to increased water usage for irrigation systems and other outdoor water use. As such, wethe Company typically expect ourexpects its operating revenues to be the highest in the third quarter of each year. Weather that is hotter andand/or drier than average generally increases operating revenues, whereas, weather that is cooler and/or wetter than average generally serves to suppresssuppresses customer water demand and can reduce water operating revenues. ThreeTwo of ourthe Company’s jurisdictions, California Illinois and New York,Illinois, have adopted revenue stability mechanisms which permit usthe Company to collect state PUC-authorized revenue for a given period whichthat is not tied to the volume of water sold during that period, thereby lessening the impact of weather variability. See Economic Regulation—Regulation and Rate Making for additional information regarding revenue stability mechanisms.

Market-Based Businesses
Through our Market-Based Businesses, we provide a broad range11

Table of related and complementary water and wastewater services to military bases, municipalities, gas exploration and production companies, as well as commercial, industrial and residential customers. These businesses are not subject to economic regulation by state PUCs andContents
Other
Other primarily includes the services provided do not require significant capital investment. Operating revenues for our Market-Based Businesses were $422 million for 2017, $451 million for 2016 and $434 million for 2015, accounting for 13%, 14% and 14%, respectively, of the Company’s total operating revenues for the same periods. Included within our Market-Based Businesses’ results is operating revenues attributed to Canadian operations of $5 million for 2017 and $6 million for both 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Our Market-Based Businesses are comprised of four operating segments:
Military Services Group,MSG business, which enters into long-term contracts with the U.S. government to provide water and wastewater services on various military bases;
Homeowner Services Group, which provides warranty-type services to homeowners and smaller commercial customers to protect against the cost of repairing broken or leaking water pipes and clogged or blocked sewer pipes on their premises, and other services;
Contract Operations Group, which enters intoinstallations. The Company also has four contracts with municipal commercial and industrial customers primarily to operate and manage water and wastewater facilities and provide other related services;services through its Contract Services Group (“CSG”). Other also includes CSG, corporate costs that are not allocated to the Company’s Regulated Businesses, interest income related to the seller promissory note and
Keystone Clearwater Solutions, LLC (“Keystone”) income from the revenue share agreement from the sale of HOS, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and fair value adjustments related to acquisitions that have not been allocated to the Regulated Businesses segment. Previously, the Company provided home services primarily to residential and smaller commercial customers through its former HOS business, which was sold on the Closing Date. As a result of the sale of HOS, the categories which were previously shown as “Market-Based Businesses” and “Other” have been combined and are shown as Other. The businesses included withinOther are not subject to regulation by state PUCs and the services provided generally do not require significant capital investment. Operating revenues for Other were $287 million for 2022, $546 million for 2021 and $522 million for 2020, accounting for 8%, which provides customized water service14% and management solutions14%, respectively, of the Company’s total operating revenues for natural gas exploration and production companies and customers in the municipal water services market.

same periods.
Military Services Group
Our Military Services Group has been granted contracts to operateMSG operates on 1318 military basesinstallations under 50-year contracts with the U.S. government as part of its UtilityUtilities Privatization Program. See Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Strategic Focus and 2017 Achievements—Growth for additional information. The scope of these contracts generally includes the O&Moperation and maintenance of the bases’installation’s water and wastewater systems and a capital program focused on asset replacement and, in certain instances, systems expansion. The replacement of assets assumed when a contract is awarded to MSG is completed either through a discrete set of projects executed in the Company isfirst five years of the contract or through the long-term recapitalization program performed over the life of the contract. Traditionally, both of these programs are funded from the contract fee. At times, new assets are required to support the base’sinstallation’s mission, and the construction of these assets areis funded by the U.S. government as additional work underseparate modifications or amendments to the contract. The current capital program doesfor these assets historically has not usebeen funded through the Company’s debt or equity or debt borrowings; however, we may makeissuances; rather, the Company has used limited short-term working capital investmentsfor short-term needs under these contracts and some working capital is used to fund work-in-process until paid bycontracts. In April 2018, the U.S. government.Army instituted a requirement that a bidder must offer financing in its proposal for these new capital projects under existing contracts, but the U.S. Army’s implementation of this requirement on existing contracts has limited the need for such financing. However, recent U.S. Army and Navy Utilities Privatization solicitations have included requirements for the successful bidder to finance discrete initial capital projects over either a five- or ten-year period after project completion. Four of MSG’s current contracts require such capital project financing, which the Company is currently addressing through internal sources of liquidity.
The contract price for ninefour of ourMSG’s contracts with the U.S. government is subject to redetermination two years after commencement of operations, and every three years thereafter. Price redetermination is a contract mechanism to periodically adjust the service fee in the next period, to reflect changes in contract obligations and anticipated market conditions. The remaining four14 contracts with the U.S. government are subject to annual price adjustments under a mechanism similar to price redetermination, called “Economic Price Adjustment.” All of these18 contracts maycould be terminated, in whole or in part, prior to the end of the 50-year term for convenience of the U.S. government, or as a result of default or non-performance by the MSG subsidiary performing the contract. In either event, pursuant to termination provisions applicable to all of these contracts, weMSG would be entitled to recover allowable costs that weit may have incurred under the contract, plus the contract profit margin on incurred costs. OurMSG’s backlog of revenue associated with ourits contracts with the U.S. government is approximately $3.6$6.9 billion,, with an average remaining contract term of 4240 years.
Sale of Homeowner Services Group
Our Homeowner Services Group, through ourPrior to the Closing Date, the Company provided various warranty protection programs providesand other home services primarily to domestic homeownersresidential and smaller commercial customers through its HOS operations. On the Closing Date, the Company sold all of the equity interests in its HOS subsidiaries to protect against repair costs for interior and external water and sewer lines, interior electric lines, heating and cooling systems and water heaters, as well as power surge protection and other related services. Our LineSaver™ program involves partnering with utilities, municipalities and other organizations to offer our protection programs to customers serviced by or affiliated with those municipalities and organizations. Terms of these partnership agreements are typically three to five years in length, with optional renewals. As of December 31, 2017, our Homeowner Services Group had approximately 1.7 million customer contracts in 43 states and the District of Columbia, and 10 LineSaver™ partnership agreements with municipalities and other organizations.
Contract Operations Group
Our Contract Operations Group enters into contracts to provide O&M services, including the delivery of design-build-operate projects and the provision of water and wastewater operations, maintenance and management services, to municipal and regional governmental entities through public-private partnerships, as well as industrial customers who possess a wide range of water quality and regulatory compliance needs. Historically, we have made minimal long-term capital investment under these contracts; instead we perform our services for a fee. Occasionally, we provide our customers with financing for capital projects as part of a long-term O&M partnership. As of December 31, 2017, our Contract Operations Group had 33 contracts across the United States and Canada, varying in size and scope, with an average remaining contract term of 3 years. In the course of pursuing our long-term strategy and growth initiatives for our Market-Based Businesses, we will concentrate on optimizing the portfolio of contracts in our Contract Operations Group, which will involve strategic decisions around the pursuit of renewals of our current contracts approaching expiration, as well as the sale of certain contracts that fall outside of our strategic focus.
Keystone
In July 2015, we acquired a 95% interest in Water Solutions Holdings, LLC, including itsindirect, wholly owned subsidiary Keystone. Keystone isof funds advised by Apax Partners LLP, a water serviceglobal private equity advisory firm (the “Buyer”), for total consideration of approximately $1.275 billion. See Item 7—Management’s Discussion and management solutions company that serves natural gas explorationAnalysis of Financial Condition and production customersResults of Operations and Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Appalachian Basin, as well as customers in the municipal water services market. Keystone is primarily focused on customized water transfer, sourcing, recycling and storage services, along with pipeline construction and related O&M services. Keystone operates under master service agreements that are generally shorter term in nature. When the initial term of these agreements expire, they typically renew automatically on an annual basis and generally are cancelable by either party with 30 days prior notice. As of December 31, 2017, Keystone serves approximately 35 customers.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Competition
We faceMSG faces competition in our Market-Based Businesses from a number of service providers, including American States Water Company Suez North America, and Veolia Environnement S.A. in our Military Services Group, and Pivotal Home Solutions (owned by Southern Company Gas) and HomeServe USA in our Homeowner Services Group. Our Contract Operations Group competes in a highly competitive market in order to secure new O&M contracts, as these contracts are awarded based on a combination


12

Table of customer relationships, service levels, competitive pricing, references and technical expertise. We also face competition in maintaining existing O&M contracts to which we are a party, as the municipal and industrial fixed term contracts frequently come up for renegotiation and are subject to an open bidding process. Competitors of our Contract Operations Group include Suez North America, Veolia Environnement S.A., Inframark, LLC and Woodard & Curran. Keystone currently faces competition from water service providers that typically provide particular segments of the water management cycle, such as Select Energy Services, Inc., TETRA Technologies, Inc. and Fluid Delivery Solutions, LLC.Contents
Environmental, Health and Safety, and Water Quality and Other Regulation
OurThe Company’s water and wastewater operations, including the services provided by both ourits Regulated Businesses, MSG and Market-Based Businesses,CSG, are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations, and in the case of our Canadian operations, Canadian laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment, health and safety, the provision of water and wastewater services, particularly with respect to the quality of water we deliverthe Company delivers to ourits customers, and the manner in which we collect, treat, discharge, recycleit collects, treats, discharges, recycles and disposedisposes of wastewater. TheseIn the United States, these regulations includeare developed under federal legislation including the Safe Drinking Water Act, the Lead and Copper Rule (“LCR”), the Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act and the Clean Water Act. WeAct, and under a variety of applicable state laws. Environmental, health and safety, and water quality regulations are complex and may vary from state to state in those instances where a state has adopted a standard that is more stringent than the federal standard. For example, while the EPA has announced the intention to propose drinking water regulations for two PFAS compounds (perfluorooctanoic acid, or PFOA, and perfluorooctane sulfonic acid, or PFOS) and issued non-enforceable lifetime Health Advisory Levels for PFOA, PFOS and two other PFAS compounds, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection has already established enforceable drinking water standards for three PFAS compounds (PFOA, PFOS, and perfluorononanoic acid, or PFNA) and the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection also recently announced enforceable drinking water standards for PFOA and PFOS in advance of the federal EPA proposed regulations. The Company is also subject to various federal, state, local and Canadianlocal laws and regulations governing the storage of hazardous materials, the management and disposal of hazardous and solid wastes, discharges to air and water, the cleanup of contaminated sites, dam safety and other matters relating to the protection of the environment and health and safety. State PUCs also set conditions and standards for the water and wastewater services we deliver.the Company delivers.
Environmental, healthThe Company maintains an environmental program that includes responsible business practices focused on compliance with environmental laws and safety,regulations and the effective use of natural resources, recognizing that drinking water quality regulations are complexstandards have generally, over time, increased in number and change frequently. For example, in 2017, the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection announced that it would seek to adopt more stringent maximum contaminant levels for perfluorooctoanic acid, or PFOA, and perfluorononanoic acid, or PFNA. The overall trend has been that they have become increasingly stringent over time.more stringent. As newer or stricter standards are introduced, ourthe Company’s capital and operating costs couldneeded to comply with them will likely increase. We incurThe Company incurs substantial costs associated with compliance with the environmental, health and safety, and water quality standards to which ourits operations are subject. In the past, our Regulated Businesses have generally been able to recover the costs associated with compliance; however, this recovery is affected by regulatory lagsubject and the corresponding uncertainties surrounding rate recovery. We estimateCompany invests in technology solutions for enhanced detection and monitoring of water quality issues. The Company estimates that weit will make capital expenditures of $96approximately $800 million during 2018over the next five years, and $138$195 million during 2019in 2023 for environmental control facilities, which we definethe Company defines for this purpose as any project (or portion thereof) that involves the preservation of air, water or land. We also maintain an environmental programThe Company believes that includes responsible business practices, compliance with environmental laws and regulations, and effective use of natural resources. We believe that ourits operations are materially in compliance with, and in many cases surpass, minimum standards required by applicable environmental laws and regulations.
OurThe Company’s operations also involve the use, storage and disposal of hazardous substances and wastes. For example, ourthe Company’s water and wastewater treatment facilities store and use chlorine and other chemicals that generate wastes that require proper handling and disposal under applicable environmental requirements. WeThe Company also could incur remedial costs in connection with any contamination relating to ourits operations or facilities or ourits off-site disposal of wastes.waste. The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act of 1980 (“CERCLA”), authorizes the EPA, and comparable state laws authorize state environmental authorities, to issue orders and bring enforcement actions to compel responsible parties to investigate and take remedial actions at any site that is determined to present an actual or potential threat to human health or the environment because of an actual or threatened release of one or more hazardous substances. Parties that generated or transported hazardous substances to such sites, as well as thecurrent and former owners and operators of such sites, may be deemed liable, without regard to fault, under CERCLA or comparable state laws. Although we arethe Company is not aware of any material cleanup or decontamination obligations, the discovery of contamination or the imposition of such obligations in the future could result in additional costs. Ourcosts to the Company. The Company’s facilities and operations are also subject to requirements under the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Act and inspections thereunder. Certain of our subsidiaries are involved in pending legal proceedings relating to environmental matters. See Item 3—Legal Proceedings for additional information.
Safe Drinking Water Act
The Safe Drinking Water Act and related regulations establish national quality standards for drinking water. The EPA has issued rules governing the levels of numerous, naturally occurring and man-mademanufactured chemical and microbial contaminants and radionuclides allowable in drinking water, and continues to propose new rules. These rules also prescribe testing requirements for detecting regulated contaminants, the treatment systems that may be used for removing those contaminants, and other requirements. To date, the EPA has set standards for approximatelyover 90 contaminants and water quality indicators for drinking water, and there is a process in place to make a regulatory determination on at least five additional compounds every five years.

To help formulate the basis for future regulations, the EPA has the authority to require monitoring for additional, unregulated contaminants under the Unregulated Contaminant Monitoring Rule (the “Rule”). Our laboratory and many of our treatment systems are preparing for the fourth round of testing under the Rule, which will begin in 2018. There are thousands of other chemical compounds that are not regulated, many of which are lacking a testing methodology, occurrence data, health effects information and/or treatment technology. The process of developing new drinking water standards is long and complex, but wethe Company actively participateparticipates with the EPA and other water industry groups by sharing research and water quality operational knowledge. See Item 1—Business—Research—Research and Development—Contaminants of Emerging ContainmentsConcern for further discussion.additional information.
To effect the removal or inactivation


13

The Company is within the EPA’s time frame for compliance with standards and rules developed under the regulation of these standards,the Safe Drinking Water Act, which includes sample collection, data analysis, and, in some instances engineering planning and system implementation. Recent monitoring under the Long-Term 2 Rule has resulted in the need for more than 30implementation of our surface water systems to provide additional protection against cryptosporidium. In most cases, this will involve installing UV disinfection at an estimated cost ranging from $150 million to $250 million.treatment enhancements. Further, the EPA is actively considering regulations for a number of contaminants, including strontium, hexavalent chromium, fluoride, nitrosamines, perchlorate, some pharmaceuticals and certain volatile organic compounds. We doThe Company does not anticipate that any such regulations, if enacted, will require implementation in 2018.
Across the Company, we conduct over one million water quality tests each year at our laboratory facilities and plant operations, including continuous on-line instrumentations such as monitoring turbidity levels, disinfectant residuals and adjustments to chemical treatment based on changes in incoming water. We participate in the Partnership for Safe Water, the EPA’s voluntary program to meet more stringent goals for reducing microbial contaminants. With 68 of our 72 surface water treatment plants receiving the EPA program’s “Director” award, which recognizes utilities that: (i) have completed a comprehensive self-assessment report; (ii) created an action plan for continuous improvement; and (iii) produced high quality drinking water, we account for approximately one-third of the plants receiving such awards nationwide. In addition, 66 of our surface water treatment plants have received the “Five-Year Phase III” award, 61 plants have received the “Ten-Year Phase III” award and 54 plants have received the “Fifteen-Year Phase III” award; these awards recognize plants that have met the Director award status for five, 10 and 15 years, respectively. Further, nine of our surface water plants have received the “Presidents” award, which recognizes treatment plants that achieve the Partnership’s rigorous individual filter effluent turbidity standards.2023.
Although it is difficult to project the ultimate costs of complying with the above or other pending or future requirements, we expectthe Company expects current cost requirements under the Safe Drinking Water Act and other similar laws to be recoverable through the regulatory process and therefore compliance costs are not expected to have a material impact on ourits operations or financial condition. In addition, capital expenditures and operating costs to comply with environmental mandates have been traditionally recognized by the state PUCs as appropriate for inclusion in establishing rates. As a result, we expectthe Company expects to recover the operating and capital costs resulting from these pending or future requirements.
Lead and Copper Rule and Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act
Across the country, there is a renewed focus on the potential risk of lead in drinking water. In 1991, the EPA published the LCRLead and Copper Rule (“LCR”) to control lead and copper in drinking water and, since that time, has issued minor revisions in 2000, 2004 and 2007, enhancing monitoring, reporting and public education requirements. In 2011, Congress enacted the Reduction of Lead in Drinking Water Act regarding the use and introduction into commerce of lead pipes, plumbing fittings for fixtures, solder and flux. While these advances have made an impact in reducing lead exposure in drinking water, legacy lead plumbing materials, primarily in building plumbing, still remain in many communities. The EPA is currently workingfailure of certain water systems in the United States to develop long-term revisions tocomply with the requirements of the LCR withhas received recent media attention and scrutiny, and in certain cases, has led to a revised draft likely in 2018. It is currently estimated that approximately 5%number of ourinvestigations and the imposition of significant penalties and sanctions against the operators of those systems and others. As part of its ongoing water main replacement and service lines contain lead. We have reviewed our related practices and are working with stakeholdersline renewal projects, the Company has started to develop feasible solutions to remove legacy lead from service lines in older neighborhoods. A fundamental step in this effort is the ongoing project to inventoryreplace lead service lines across our footprint. Our(“LSLs”) in accordance with current scientific guidance. Also, the Company utilizes appropriate corrosion control techniques as necessary to comply with current water quality regulatory requirements. On December 21, 2021, the EPA announced next steps to strengthen the regulatory framework on lead in drinking water, including implementing the Lead and Copper Rule Revisions (“LCRR”) and indicated their intent to finalize a forthcoming Lead and Copper Rule Improvements (“LCRI”) prior to October 16, 2024, the initial compliance date in the LCRR. The Company is executing an implementation strategy to comply with the initial LCRR requirement to complete a lead service line inventory. Capital expenditures and operating costs associated with the LCRI will be determined once the EPA finalizes the rule, but as previously noted, costs associated with compliance with federal water quality regulations have been traditionally recognized by PUCs as appropriate for inclusion in establishing rates.
The Company currently estimates that less than 5% of the service lines within its regulated service territories contain lead on either the Company or customer portion of the service line. The Company is replacing LSLs as part of its ongoing water main replacement and service line renewal projects. The Company’s goal is to work with the communities it currently serves to replace our lead service linesa significant majority of presently known LSLs in most of its service areas over an approximate 10 year time frame,by the end of 2030, at an estimated cost ranging fromadditional investment range of $600 million to $1.2 billion. In casesThe Company believes this will be attainable for most of its service areas where we are replacing an American Water ownedpublic policy is supportive of this goal. The IIJA was signed into law in November 2021 and provides for up to $15 billion for lead service line our standard approachreplacement through drinking water state revolving funds. The Company is awaiting further guidance on eligibility, the application process and the distribution of these funds. With regard to future acquisitions, the Company will be to replace the company-owned portionwork with those communities as part of the service line, and work with the customeracquisition process to replace the customer-owned portion of the service line. Replacing the full service line is considered a best practice as advised by the Lead Service Line Replacement Collaborative, an association of leading water industry organizations.set LSL removal goals appropriate for those systems. The prioritization of this work will dependLSL removal is dependent on several factors, including ourthe Company’s planned water main and service line renewal projects, adjacent projects by municipalities or other utilities, LCR compliance monitoring results, and cooperation with ourits customers with respect to replacing the customer-owned portion of the LSL as necessary. In certain cases, these and other factors may result in a shorter or longer time frame for replacement. Because replacing the external LSL in its entirety is advised by several water industry organizations including the U.S. National Drinking Water Advisory Council, the Lead Service Line Replacement Collaborative, and the American Water Works Association, the Company’s preferred approach is to replace the entire external LSL if lead is found on either the Company or customer portion of the service line.line; full LSL replacement is also consistent with the LCRR. The Lead Service Line Replacement Collaborative is a diverse group of public health, water utility, environmental, labor, consumer and housing organizations from across the country working together to encourage communities to accelerate the full replacement of LSLs through collaborative efforts at the local level.



14

Clean Water Act
The Clean Water Act regulates discharges from drinking water and wastewater treatment facilities into lakes, rivers, streams and groundwater. In addition to requirements applicable to ourthe Company’s wastewater collection systems, ourits operations require discharge permits under the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (“NPDES”) permit program established under the Clean Water Act, which must be renewed every five years. Pursuant to the NPDES permit program, the EPA and implementing states set maximum discharge limits for wastewater effluents and overflows from wastewater collection systems. Discharges that exceed the limits specified under NPDES permits can lead to the imposition of fines and penalties, and persistent non-compliance could lead to significant fines and penalties and other compliance costs. In addition, the difficulty of obtaining and complying with NPDES permits, and renewing expiring permits, may impose time and cost burdens on ourthe Company’s operations. From time to time, discharge violations occur at ourthe Company’s facilities, some of which result in fines. We doThe Company does not expect any such violations or fines to have a material impact on ourits results of operations or financial condition.
Environmental, Social Responsibility The EPA has identified leveraging wastewater discharge permitting and Governance
Integratingapplication of biosolids, or sewage sludge, containing PFAS as areas of focus in its PFAS Strategic Roadmap. Individual states may also take action in these areas. As indicated previously, capital expenditures and operating costs to comply with environmental social responsibility and governance (“ESG”) policies and practices into our daily operations emphasizes our belief that the only way to do business is to do it responsibly,mandates have been traditionally recognized by delivering value to our customers, building strong communities, leveraging innovation to develop our industry and supporting the expertise and dedication of our people. This focus is derived from our vision statement, “clean waterPUCs as appropriate for life”, and our core values: (i) safety; (ii) trust; (iii) environmental leadership; (iv) teamwork; and (v) high performance, the principles by which we work and live. Our vision and values drive our company strategy, which is centered on five central themes: 
Customers—Our customers are at the center of everything we do, helping us to shape our strategic priorities. We challenge ourselves so that if our regulated utility customers had a choice of providers, we would want them to choose us.
Safety—The safety of our employees and our customers is the number one focus for American Water.
People—Maintaining an environment which is open, diverse and inclusive, and where our people feel valued, included and accountable is critical to our ability to serve our customers every day.
Technology and Operational Efficiency—Our technology and operational efficiency strategy helps us to continually find better and more efficient ways to do business and provide the best services at affordable costs for our customers.
Growth—We believe that when companies grow, they can invest more in creating stable jobs, training, benefits, infrastructure and our communities. Growth, in turn, benefits all stakeholders.
In 2017, we issued our fourth biennial Corporate Responsibility Report, covering our performance in 2015 to 2016. Our first report was issued in 2011, making us the first large water services company to measure its performance against the Global Reporting Index. In addition, our sustainability practices have supported our inclusion in establishing rates. As a result, the Dow Jones Sustainability North America IndexCompany expects to recover the operating and capital costs resulting from any new requirements in 2012, 2013 and 2015, and we have also maintained our position in the Euronext Vigeo® U.S. 50 index, which includes the 50 most advanced companies in the nation with respect to their environmental, social and governance performance, based on a review of hundreds of indicators.these areas.
Highlights of our commitment to our ESG policies and practices, many of which are detailed in our most recent Corporate Responsibility Report, are summarized below:
Environmental
Expect to spend between $8.0 billion and $8.6 billion on capital investments from 2018 to 2022, including:
$7.2 billion for regulated capital expenditures to address aging infrastructure, reduce/eliminate leaks, improve cyber/physical security, and increase resiliency of critical assets to climate variability;
$600 million to $1.2 billion to acquire financially distressed municipal water and wastewater systems which tend to have a strong need for capital investment; and
$200 million for strategic capital investments with approximately $164 million focused on construction of our new corporate headquarters in Camden, New Jersey, as part of the revitalization effort in this community.
Lowered our greenhouse gas emissions by approximately 26% since our base year of 2007.
Reduced water use by 3.5 billion gallons year over year, through our conservation efforts and programs.
Recycled over 2 billion gallons of water annually and produced reuse water at 30 of our facilities.
Social Responsibility
On average, more than 60,000 hours of safety training given annually to our employees.
Achieved top quartile in the water industry for customer satisfaction.

Increased our annual spend with Tier 1 diverse suppliers to over $385 million.
More than 4,000 hours of Company-sponsored community service performed annually by our employees.
Company-sponsored workplace giving campaigns with the United Way and Water For People, as well annual contributions from the American Water Charitable Foundation, focused on supporting employees in their own charitable endeavors, providing support for disaster relief efforts, and providing funding for initiatives related to clean water, conservation, education and community sustainability.
Over 85% of our job requisitions had a diverse candidate pool, with more than 50% of transfers or promotions filled by minority, female, veteran or disabled individuals.
Governance
Our Board of Directors is led by an independent, non-executive chairman, and has an average director tenure, including our two new directors, of approximately 6 years.
Including our two new directors, we have achieved gender parity among the members of the Board of Directors.
Stock ownership guidelines and retention requirements that align equity ownership of executives and directors with the long-term interests of our stockholders.
Research and Development
OurThe Company’s Research and Development Program
We maintainThe Company maintains an industry-leading Researchresearch and Developmentdevelopment (“R&D”) program that is designed to enhance ourits services, help ensuresupport its compliance andactivities, improve service quality and operational effectiveness. Oureffectiveness, and provide environmental leadership. For more than three decades from its inception, American Water’s R&D program has evolved into an industry-leading effort and has achieved numerous advancements in the science of drinking water, wastewater, and desalination. Through laboratory and industry resources and the team’s expertise, efforts are focused on contaminants of emerging concern, including but not limited to COVID-19, PFAS, Legionella, cyanotoxin-forming algal blooms, a variety of pathogens (for example, Cryptosporidium, Giardia, enteric viruses, and various bacteria), microbial indicators and disinfection byproducts. The Company’s R&D personnel are located at the Company’s corporate headquarters and at two laboratory testing facilities in New Jersey and Illinois, the latter housing ourits quality control and testing laboratory, which supports ourthe Company’s R&D activities through testing and analysis. Approximately one-third of our research budget is funded by competitively awarded outside research grants. Such grants reduce the cost of research and allow collaboration with leading national and international researchers. In2017, we spent $3 million on research in total, including $1 million funded by grants. Spending on research amounted to $4 million, including $1 million funded by grants, in each of 2016 and 2015.
We continueThe Company continues to leverage the Company’sits expertise and collaboratecollaborates with the EPA and state agencies to help establish effective environmental, health and safety, and water quality standards and regulation.regulations. This relationship includes the sharing of ourthe Company’s research, such as ourits treatment and distribution system optimization research and our andits national water quality monitoring data. OurThe Company’s engagement with the EPA provides usit with early insight into emerging regulatory issues and initiatives, thereby allowing usthe Company to anticipate and to accommodate ourits future compliance requirements. WeThe Company also frequently engageengages with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, other state environmental agencies. We believeagencies, and national and international water research foundations. The Company believes that continued R&D activities are critical for providing safe, reliable and affordable services, as well as maintaining ourits leadership position in the industry, which provides usthe Company with a competitive advantage as we seek additionalit seeks business with new and existing customers.operational growth.
Contaminants of Emerging ContaminantsConcern
Emerging contaminantsContaminants of emerging concern include numerous chemicals such as PFAS, pharmaceuticals, personal care products, pesticides, herbicides, andantibiotic resistant bacteria (ARB), antibiotic resistant genes (ARG), endocrine disrupting compounds, microplastics and industrial chemicals, as well as certain naturally occurring microbes, such as bacteria, viruses and parasites, which have been detected in drinking water supplies, for which the risk to the public’s health is not fully understood and/or has not been quantified. While these contaminants have been present in our drinking water for as long as they have been in use, technologicalassessed. Technological advances have only recently made it possible to detect many of them.these contaminants at trace levels. The ability to detect contaminants, even at trace levels, has raised questionsinvited discussion about these contaminants among regulators and government agencies, further affectingwhich in turn shapes the public’s perception of drinking water quality.
The Chemicals Abstract Service Registry contains over 130203 million registered chemicals, with a new substance being produced approximately every 3 seconds from chemical breakdown and reformation. We arean estimated 1,400 species of disease-causing microbes that can affect humans. The Company is continually investigating new substances and contaminants, employing a team of scientists, engineers and public health professionals to identify threats to ourits water supply, to act on emerging regulations and new health advisories, and to researchevaluate the influxbenefits of alternative or advanced treatment technologies. We maintain state-of-the-artThe Company utilizes water quality testing equipment and implementimplements new and emerging technologies to help predict and managedetect potential water supply contamination issues. Examples of ourthe Company’s efforts include:
monitoring impacts of environmental pathogen loads and removal through wastewater systems;
characterizing factors that contribute to the formation of potentially carcinogenic disinfection by-products to define best practices for their mitigation;


15

advancing the science on holistic management strategies to improve distribution system water quality further;
using ourits research findings to communicate information to ourits customers (via a web site) onregarding potential actions to limit occurrences of Legionella in their buildings; in this regard, the actions they can take to manage Legionella (the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention statistics indicate that water-associated disease from Legionella is on the rise, with exposure typically associated with customer-owned plumbing systems in large buildings);buildings;
aerial drone testingdefining a framework to support management or possible future regulation of opportunistic pathogens;
developing expanded monitoring methods for short-chain and fluorinated replacement PFAS and piloting treatment techniques;
systematically investigating PFAS removal by treatment processes in a wide range of water matrices;
leading a PFAS risk communication strategy for the water sector;
using innovative technologies to detect harmfuland manage algal blooms and ultrasonic technology testing to help prevent taste and odor events and to eliminate cyanotoxins before they get to the water treatment plant;
the implementationmonitoring of taste and odor issues that impact customer satisfaction using expanded analytical methods to detect compounds, and evaluating and recommending treatment practices;
implementing water source assessment tools, including sensors and data analytics, to evaluate and track chemical storage and transport through watersheds and to detectaid in the identification of source water contamination events;
developing methodology and
advanced measurement techniques for contaminants of emerging concern to investigate transport, occurrence and treatment; and

the implementation ofimplementing activated carbon, biofiltration and biofiltration for theion exchange treatment to seek to control contaminants of emerging contaminants.concern.
Support ServicesService Company and Security
American Water Works Service Company, Inc. (the “Service(“Service Company”) is oura wholly owned subsidiary of the Company that provides support and operational services to the Company’s operating subsidiaries.Company and its affiliates. These services are predominantly provided to ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses under contracts that have been approved by PUCs, where necessary, and are also provided to (i) our three Market-Based Businesses organized under American Water Enterprises, Inc., our wholly owned subsidiary (“AWE”),the MSG and (ii) KeystoneCSG businesses as requested or may otherwise be necessary. Services provided by the Service Company may include accounting and finance, administration, business development, communications, compliance, education and training, engineering, health and safety, human resources, information systems, internal audit, investor relations, legal and governance, operations, procurement, R&D, rates and regulatory support, security, risk management and insurance, treasury, and water quality and R&D. Thequality. Service Company also operates two nationalprovides customer service centers located in Alton, Illinois and Pensacola, Florida, which provide customer relations, field service and operational support to ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses.Businesses, which includes call handling, billing, a major accounts program and other related services. Services are provided by the Service Company at cost, enabling ourthe Company’s operating subsidiaries to fulfill their responsibilities in a cost-effective manner, while providing them access to in-depth, functional expertise.
OurThe Company’s security team provides oversight and policy guidance on physical, cyber and information security, as well as business continuity, throughout ourits operations. It is responsible for designing, implementing, monitoring and supporting effective physical and technical security controls for ourthe Company’s physical assets, business systems and operational technologies. Risk assessments are conducted periodically to evaluate the effectiveness of existing security controls and serve as the basis for additional safeguards, security controls and measures. Operational and technical security controls are deployed and integrated as safeguards against unauthorized access to the Company’s information systems. These controls: (i)controls are aimed at (i) assuring the continuity of business processes that are dependent upon automation;automation, (ii) seek to maintainmaintaining the integrity of our data;the Company’s data, (iii) supportsupporting regulatory and legislative compliance requirements;requirements, and (iv) are aimed at maintaining safe and reliable service to ourthe Company’s customers. We engageThe Company engages in partnerships with U.S. federal, state and local law enforcement agencies to coordinate and improve the security of ourits water delivery systems and to safeguard ourits water supply and operations.
Environmental, Social Responsibility and Governance
The Company considers environmental, social responsibility and governance(“ESG”) principles fundamental to its corporate strategy and values. Integration of these principles into the Company’s daily operations emphasizes its belief that “how” a company operates is just as important as “what” a company does.
Delivering a reliable supply of safe, clean and affordable water to customers and treating wastewater has been fundamental to the Company’s business for decades. Within every community in which the Company operates, there is an opportunity to make a sustainable positive impact on the community, reflect the communities served with diverse and skilled employees, and maintain the governance and diligence to meet or exceed service expectations for decades to come.


16

Key Highlights
Demonstrated ESG Leadership
The Company’s values and actions have achieved prestigious recognition by many leading firms devoted to recognizing companies that demonstrate ESG leadership.
The Company was ranked fifth in the Energy and Utilities industry category within Newsweek’s 2023 list of America’s Most Responsible Companies and ranked 19th within Barron’s list of the 100 Most Sustainable Companies in 2022.
The Company was included in the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index for the fifth consecutive year, was recognized as a top-scoring company, for the fourth consecutive year, on the Disability Equality Index (DEI)®, as well as a Military Friendly Employer and Supplier.
The Company earned the U.S. Department of Homeland Security SAFETY Act Designation for its internal enterprise security program, which includes risk management processes, personnel training and emergency exercises, and security oversight activities. The Company was the first U.S. water and wastewater company and third utility to earn this designation.
Environmental and Sustainability
Emissions for the Company’s Regulated Businesses
The Company established medium- and long-term goals that are science-based and aligned with the Paris Agreement, for scope 1 (direct) and scope 2 (indirect, derived from the Company’s purchase of power) greenhouse gas emissions reductions.
The goals aim to reduce absolute scope 1 and 2 emissions by 50% by 2035 (from a 2020 baseline year) and achieve net zero scope 1 and scope 2 emissions by 2050.
These goals complement the Company’s existing short-term goal of reducing absolute scope 1 and 2 greenhouse gas emissions by more than 40% by 2025 (from a 2007 baseline year).
The Company has also estimated certain of its scope 3 greenhouse gas emissions, including Categories 1 (Purchased Goods and Services), 2 (Capital Goods), 3 (Fuel and Energy Related Activities) and 6 (Business Travel).
Water Quality & Wastewater
The Company employs a team of R&D scientists dedicated to partnering with water research organizations on water quality and technology-based source water monitoring.
The Company received 11 drinking water Notices of Violation (“NOVs”) in 2022, two of which were related to water quality and maximum contaminant level exceedances. These metrics are determined by counting the overall number of drinking water NOVs and drinking water NOVs related to maximum contaminant level exceedances received by the Company in accordance with internally established procedures, which may exclude NOVs related to newly-acquired systems and associated with third-party violations, among others.
The Company invested approximately $2.3 billion in renewing and improving assets of the Regulated Businesses in 2022 and expects to invest between $12.5 billion to $13 billion over the next five years. Nearly 70% of the Company’s capital plan is dedicated to infrastructure renewal and improvement, 10% to 12% is allocated to resiliency, and the balance is invested in water quality, operational efficiency, system expansion and other categories.
Policy Leadership
The Company collaborates and partners with federal and state agencies to support effective environmental, health and safety, and water quality and affordability standards and regulations.
The Company participates in many industry organizations at the local, state and national level, including: The National Association of Water Companies (NAWC), American Water Works Association (AWWA) and Edison Electric Institute (EEI).


17

Social Responsibility
Customers
The Company’s average monthly residential water bills were approximately $57 in 2022, or 0.77% of the median household income, based on data from the U.S. Census Bureau’s American Community Survey. The Company is focused on keeping customer bills affordable compared to income, driving a culture of continuous improvement, diligent cost management, and technology enhancements that help drive affordability.
The Company supports low-income customer assistance programs across 12 states: California, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kentucky, Maryland, Missouri, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, Tennessee, Virginia and West Virginia.
To better reflect the customers that the Company serves, the Company increased spend with diverse suppliers and small businesses in 2022 by more than 35% compared to last year.
For 2022, the Company achieved an aggregate residential customer satisfaction rating in the top half among the Company’s industry peer group. We measure performance on Customer Experience through our performance on the J.D. Power U.S. Water Utility Residential Customer Satisfaction Study. The study measures the satisfaction of residential water customers of the 90 largest water utilities in the United States and considers six factors to score companies on a 1,000-point scale: quality and reliability; price; conservation; billing and payment; communications; and customer service.
Employees
During 2022, over 117,000 hours of safety training, including physical security and cybersecurity training, were completed by the Company’s employees, as well as a mandatory Code of Ethics training requirement.
The Company has made significant progress toward its zero injuries goal, reducing workplace injuries by 52% since 2017. Through year-end 2022, the Company has further reduced its OSHA recordable injury rate (“ORIR”) to 0.85, the lowest in the Company’s recorded history, which is approximately two times better than the water industry average.
During 2022, approximately 83% of the Company’s job requisitions had a diverse candidate pool, with approximately 46% of transfers or promotions filled by diverse individuals.
Communities
More than $900,000 was donated in 2022 by the Company’s employees and the American Water Charitable Foundation (AWCF), a 501(c)(3) private foundation established by American Water in 2010, of which over $430,000 was provided by employees through workplace giving campaigns including the United Way, Water For People and other volunteering giving campaigns that supported more than 1,600 public charities nationwide. These efforts were in addition to the $2.3 million given by the AWCF through the Keep Communities Flowing Grant Program - more than $3 million combined.
Stakeholder Engagement
In 2022, the Company completed a materiality assessment to align ESG efforts with stakeholder priorities. Participants included, among others, regulators, investors, customers, employees, and a member of the Company’s Board of Directors. The results of the assessment will be included in the Company’s 2021-2022 Sustainability Report, which will be published in 2023.
Governance
Board and Committees
The Board of Directors and each of its standing committees are led by an independent, non-executive chair.
The Board of Directors met 15 times in 2022.
The Board of Directors’ Safety, Environmental, Technology and Operations (SETO) Committee, which oversees several key ESG matters, met four times in 2022.
The Board of Directors reflects gender, racial and experiential diversity. As of December 31, 2022, approximately 64% of the Company’s directors voluntarily self-identified as diverse based on gender, race, disability and military veteran status.
The Company’s average director tenure was approximately 7 years as of December 31, 2022.


18

The members of the Company’s Board of Directors have demonstrated expertise, including, among others, experience in utility operations, regulatory matters, sustainability, customer service, cybersecurity, the military, financial services and capital markets, service as a public company CEO, CFO and/or board member, and management of global operations.
ESG-Related Disclosures and Transparency
The Company issued its annual ESG Data Summary on its website, covering sustainability performance for key metrics within the 2022 calendar year.
In addition, the Company issued its second annual Inclusion, Diversity & Equity Report and launched a new diversity website, which describes the Company’s inclusion and diversity strategies, practices, policies and programs from across the business. New disclosures include:
EEO-1 data for 2020 and 2021;
Summary of results and conclusions from the Company’s third-party pay equity studies and internal labor market analyses; and
Two new people-related goals in the 2022 Annual Performance Plan (“APP”) meant to increase representation of women and increase ethnic and racial diversity among employees at American Water, adding to existing APP sustainability goals.
The Company discloses on its website its Political Contributions Policy, and, on an annual basis, information related to its political contributions, payments to tax-exempt organizations and trade associations, and lobbying expenditures.
Human Capital Resources
Overview
The Company’s people are a critical part of its business, and the Company’s investment in its people begins with the recruitment of qualified and diverse talent and continues throughout employment. The Company’s employee value proposition, called weCARE, is a central part of the Company’s human capital resources mission and focuses on employee experience as an influencer of an employee’s opinions and emotional response about the Company as an employer.
Additionally, the Company believes that representing the communities in which it serves plays a key role in its ability to serve its customers and improves its talent. To support this proposition, the Company promotes an inclusive culture where its employees are given the opportunity to develop to their fullest potential and understand that they directly contribute to the Company’s ability to operate, grow, and serve its customers. The Company also believes that investing in the safety, health and well-being of its employees is a key component of its people and culture goals, and that these investments allow employees to generate great ideas, provide quality customer service and make a difference in the lives of the Company’s customers.
Employee MattersHealth and Safety
A longstanding value and strategy of the Company is safety. In this regard, the Company continues to focus on the safety of its employees and contractors so that they may return home from work in the same, or better, condition than when they arrived. The Company strives for all employees to feel emotionally safe, live a healthy lifestyle and be physically safe at work and at home. The Company assesses occupational health and safety to measure performance across the entire organization, with the ultimate goal of achieving zero incidents, injuries and fatalities for the Company’s employees and contractors.
To uphold the Company’s commitment to safety, the Company’s employees completed over 117,000 hours of employee safety training, including physical security and cybersecurity training, during 2022. Additionally, through frequent labor-management meetings, the Company encourages open exchanges to explore new ways to further enhance safety on the job. All employees are empowered to demonstrate safety leadership by taking the time they need to complete a task safely and to use “Stop Work Authority” — the power to stop working immediately whenever they believe a task is unsafe — to personally mitigate the hazard or issue or collaborate with management to create a safe situation. The Company believes that this Stop Work Authority is so important that it is stated on the back of every employee’s identification badge.
For 2022, the Company had its lowest ORIR injury rate in its recorded history, achieving an 18.8% reduction in injuries compared to 2021, taking into account a 7% decrease in labor hours due to the sales of HOS and the Company’s New York subsidiary. Also, the number of Days Away Restricted or Transferred (“DART”) injuries decreased by 36.1% compared to 2021. This decrease shows a significant improvement in those injuries that have a higher severity. For 2022, the Company’s ORIR was 0.85 (52 injuries) and its DART rate was 0.37 (23 injuries), compared to an ORIR of 0.97 (64 injuries) and a DART rate of 0.54 (36 injuries) in 2021.


19

In 2022, American Water teams led by promoting safety leading indicator activities, including pre-job safety briefings and near miss reporting, and by achieving internal Certified Safe Worker designations. Near miss reports, where employees report potential hazards or incidents in a safe and secure manner, increased by 20% in 2022 over 2021, and 97% of near miss incident corrective actions were completed, with nearly 90% completed within 30 days. The Company utilizes near miss reporting and timely corrective actions as key measurements of employee engagement and safety performance.
The commitment to safety as a strategic imperative also includes building a culture of well-being where all employees can feel emotionally safe and live a healthy lifestyle. Through well-being education, the Company is able to encourage employees to take preventative actions and increase participation in annual well-care exams and cancer screenings, which increased by over 4% during 2022, compared to 2021.
Employee and Workplace Reintegration
As an essential business that provides water and wastewater services, during 2022, the Company continued to focus on the care and safety of its employees, contractors, vendors and others who work at or visit the Company’s worksites. The Company launched its employee and workplace reintegration plan to bring its employees safely back to the workplace and in its field operations in the wake of easing of COVID-19-related restrictions by federal, state and local governmental and health authorities. The Company instituted greater workplace flexibility, including hybrid work opportunities, where feasible. The Company supported these reintegration efforts by keeping employees’ safety, health and emotional well-being as a top priority and by continuing to follow guidance from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, as well as federal, state and local health authorities. The Company also continued to provide employees with temporary medical and emotional health benefits as needed during 2022. To keep employees informed on the changing conditions during reintegration and to support their emotional well-being, the Company held several all-employee podcasts featuring medical and emotional health speakers who discussed the status of the pandemic, provided updates on vaccine and booster activity, and led sessions focused on workforce and personal change management related to reintegration.
Inclusion, Diversity and Equity
During 2022, the Company continued to focus on creating a culture through its promotion of inclusion, diversity and equity. At all levels, the Company strives to understand, respect, value and provide equal opportunity to each employee, and to foster an environment where employees’ differences are embraced and celebrated. The Company holds as an essential concept the right of employees to proudly share their ideas and unique perspectives in an environment built on mutual respect, equity and inclusion. The Company is committed to diversity among its workforce, executive and senior management leadership teams, by reflecting the diversity of the communities in which the Company serves. The Company expects all leaders to lead with inclusion, diversity and equity.
In 2022, the Company included in its APP new workforce diversity performance goals designed to increase the representation of women and ethnic and racial diversity in the Company’s workplace. The goals measure the percentage of female and racial/ethnic diversity among the Company’s workforce based on voluntary self-identification. In addition, the Company continues to hold its leaders accountable for developing a diverse workforce by maintaining management level representation goals.
In addition, in 2022, the Company introduced its DiversityatAW.com website to provide transparency and communicate progress on the Company’s workforce diversity initiatives. This web site currently includes, among other information, the Company’s ID&E report, its EEO-1 data for 2021, key employee diversity metrics (which are updated quarterly), and a discussion of the Company’s pay equity study and internal labor market analysis.
During 2022, 83.1% of the Company’s hiring candidate pools were diverse. Additionally, for 2022, approximately 46.4% of the Company’s internal employee transfers and promotions were filled with a diverse individual, reflecting the Company’s commitment to employee development and career growth as well as the Company’s focus on diversity, inclusion and equity. For purposes of these metrics, diversity refers to gender, race, ethnicity, disability, veteran/military spouse status, and LGBTQ+ status, all based on voluntary, self-identified employee information.
The Company maintains active memberships with groups such as Hiring our Heroes, Military Spouse Employment Partnership, American Corporate Partners, CEO Action for Diversity and Inclusion, Disability: IN, Paradigm for Parity, and Out and Equal, to further enhance its ability to recruit and retain diverse employees. Among this year’s recognitions, the Company was designated as a 2022 Military Friendly® Silver Employer and recognized by Military Times for its industry-leading efforts on hiring and supporting U.S. military veterans.
The Company was also a top scorer in the 2022 Disability Equality Index for the fourth consecutive year and was recognized by U.S. Veterans Magazine as a veteran-friendly company and as an organization with a veteran-friendly supplier diversity program. The Company also received the 2022 DiversityInc Top Utility recognition for 2022.


20

In keeping with the Company’s values, the Company does not tolerate discrimination, harassment or retaliation by or toward any employee, vendor, customer or other person in its workplace. All employees are required to complete anti-harassment, workplace respect and dignity, unconscious bias and inclusion and diversity training. In addition, annual Code of Ethics training is provided to all employees, which includes instructions on using the Company’s anonymous hotline for reporting potential Code of Ethics violations.
The Company’s four Employee Business Resource Groups (“EBRGs”), which represent diverse employee demographics (Women, African American/Black, LGBTQ+ and Disabilities/Caregivers), strive to create measurable and long-lasting positive impacts on employees’ careers, as well as the Company’s culture and communities in which it serves. EBRG members participate in community events throughout the year, which highlight the importance of supporting community partnerships. For example, employees participated in the annual Juneteenth Unity Walk that supported the National Alliance on Mental Illness, an organization that provides advocacy, education, and support for, and public awareness of, mental illness.
Total Rewards
American Water’s health and well-being programs are approached holistically by offering the following benefits, among others: medical, prescription, dental, vision, disability, a retirement savings plan, and life insurance coverage, as well as a health and wellness program and a menu of additional voluntary benefits. The Company’s Total Rewards programs are designed to reflect many aspects of employee health and well-being, cultivate an inclusive workforce, and motivate, attract and retain talent to seek to achieve the Company’s strategic business priorities.
As part of Total Rewards, the Company provides a comprehensive compensation and benefit program designed to recognize the vital roles the Company’s employees play. Further, all the Company’s employees, including those who are union-represented, participate in the APP, to promote alignment between performance-based compensation and the Company’s short-term performance goals. As part of its commitment to providing an inclusive and equitable culture for all employees, the Company regularly reviews pay equity to make sure pay decisions are based on the responsibilities, talents and skills of our employees, rather than, factors such as gender, race or ethnicity.
All employees who average 30 hours or more per week receive full-time benefits. Approximately 90% of all benefit eligible employees are enrolled in the Company’s healthcare benefits. Full-time employees pay approximately 16% of the total cost of medical, dental and vision coverage. Additional medical benefits include coverage for applied behavior analysis, autism treatment, transgender services and hearing aids, as well as a fertility assistance benefit. The Company also offers additional employment benefits, including holiday, vacation and sick time, which are at levels generally greater than or equal to those offered by other companies in the utility industry.
Every five years, the Company negotiates national health and welfare benefits with its union-represented employees. On November 30, 2022, a five-year extension of the Company’s national benefits agreement with its union-represented employees was reached and ratified, effective through July 2028. See —Workforce Data below for more information. The extension agreement includes, among other things, a revised benefit cost sharing allocation, six weeks of paid family leave, an increase in the target payout under the APP for covered employees, and coverage for infertility treatment beginning in plan year 2025.
Talent Development
The Company partners with business leaders to understand the key behaviors and competencies required to operate safely and effectively, and to foster professional growth with the goal to create and deploy programs designed to attract, motivate, develop and retain talented employees, and foster a learning culture. The Company also requires every employee, including its union-represented employees, to complete a minimum of 25 hours of training each year. Approximately 96.7% of activefull-time employees hired before October 1, 2022, met this requirement for 2022, with over 302,000 hours of total training completed during the year. In addition to required role-based training, managers assist employees to identify professional development opportunities, utilizing a framework of on-the-job learning, social learning, and formal learning, to help them reach their full potential and grow their careers.
Developing talent to provide a pathway to executive leadership is a critical priority for the Company. During 2022, the Company engaged in succession planning activities for the Company’s business-critical and business-impact positions. These succession plans aid in providing continued leadership for the growth and future of the Company’s business, while also seeking to promote diversity, retention and development. In addition to succession of executive and senior leadership roles, in 2022, the Company initiated talent reviews, which served to identify critical skills and competency areas as well as top and emerging talent with a focus on diversity, and supported a discussion of strengths, gaps and development plans. Talent reviews were conducted for a select group of employees, including employees who are being assessed for senior leadership or other critical roles.


21

Employee Experience
The Company has established its weCARE employee value proposition that focuses on employee experience as an influencer of an employee’s opinions and emotional response about the Company as an employer. weCARE is composed of five elements: deeper connections; personal growth; shared purpose; flexibility; and well-being. weCARE represents the Company’s commitment to value its employees and build a safe, healthy and inclusive culture where every employee knows their value and is appreciated for their talents and commitment to supporting the Company’s success. The Company offers employees programs covering each of the five components of weCARE. The Company is committed to improving the employee experience by listening to employees through focus group discussions and employee surveys, among other tools. To that end, the Company captures employee feedback, which helps the Company understand how employees are feeling and permits appropriate refinement of the Company’s employee programs, benefits and support.
In early 2022, the Company introduced a new development role of Culture Champion. Each Culture Champion is responsible for partnering with their local leadership and managing and communicating local activities and actions that seek to advance the Company’s culture.
Workforce Data
As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company had approximately 46%6,500 employees. For 2022, the Company’s employee turnover rate, which the Company defines as the ratio of ourthe number of separated employees to the 12-month average headcount during 2022, was 12.3%, down from 13.1% in 2021. American Water seeks to reduce regrettable employee turnover by assessing the effectiveness of weCARE and through its efforts to foster the Company’s employee experience.
As of December 31, 2022, approximately 47% of the Company’s workforce was represented by unions, which include 7675 collective bargaining agreements with 1914 different unions. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017 we had one collective bargaining agreement beyond expiration, affecting approximately 180 employees, all of which are actively working underIn 2022, the terms of the existing agreement, and another collective bargaining agreement in the process of being implemented, affecting approximately 20 employees. During 2018, 20 of ourCompany entered into three new collective bargaining agreements that cover approximately 215 employees, and our national benefits agreement with mostrenegotiated all 21 collective bargaining agreements that were set to expire during the year. During 2023, 18 of the labor unions representing employees in our Regulated Businesses,Company’s collective bargaining agreements will be expiringexpire in accordance with their terms.terms and the Company expects to be able to negotiate these agreements during the year. In addition, on November 30, 2022, a five-year extension of the Company’s national benefits agreement was ratified through July 31, 2028. This agreement covers approximately 3,000 of the Company’s union-represented employees and their families and provides them with healthcare and other benefits. The Company also collaborates with union leadership on topics such as safety, customer, technology and employee benefits in forums such as the Joint Healthcare Committee, National Labor Management Committee and the annual Labor Management Conference.
Board Oversight
The Executive Development and Compensation Committee (ED&CC) of the Board of Directors establishes and reviews the Company’s overall compensation philosophy and oversees the compensation and benefits plans and programs for its executive officers. The ED&CC oversees the process of planning for executive officer succession. It also provides oversight of the Company’s inclusion, diversity and equity programs and initiatives. Further, the ED&CC is responsible for reviewing and assessing, at least annually, the Company’s culture and related culture engagement, its organizational and leadership development plans and programs, and its programs designed to identify, attract and retain high-potential employees.


22

Information About Our Executive Officers
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the name, age, offices held and business experience for each of ourthe Company’s executive officers, as of February 20, 2018:
15, 2023:
NameAgeOffice and Experience
M. Susan N. StoryHardwick5860
President and Chief Executive Officer. Ms. StoryHardwick has served as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since May 2014. Ms. StoryFebruary 2, 2022. She joined the Company in June 2019 as the Company's Executive Vice President—Finance and served as Seniorthe Company's Chief Financial Officer from July 2019 until May 16, 2022. From December 7, 2021 until January 31, 2022, Ms. Hardwick also served as Interim Chief Executive Officer. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Hardwick served as the Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company from April 2013 until May 2014.Vectren Corporation, which was sold to CenterPoint Energy, Inc., an electric and natural gas utility, on February 1, 2019. Ms. Hardwick joined Vectren Corporation in January 2000 and served in a variety of positions, including: Vice President, Controller and Assistant Treasurer; Senior Vice President, Finance; Senior Vice President, Chief Financial Officer; and Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining American Water,Vectren, Ms. Hardwick was Assistant Corporate Comptroller at Cinergy Corp. She began her career with Arthur Andersen & Co. Ms. Hardwick is a Certified Public Accountant. Since September 2020, Ms. Hardwick has served on the Board of Directors of New Jersey Resources Corporation, a diversified energy services company, where she served as Presidentis currently serving a three-year term expiring in 2024, and Chief Executive Officer of Southern Company Services, a subsidiary of Southern Company, fromsince January 2011 until March 2013 and President and Chief Executive Officer of Gulf Power Company, also a subsidiary of Southern Company, from 2003 until December 2010. Since 2008, Ms. Story1, 2021, she has served as a member of the board of directors of Raymond James Financial, Inc., a diversified financial services company, and as lead director since 2016. Since January 2017, Ms. Story has also served on the board of directors of Dominion Energy, Inc., a producer and transporter of energy.its Audit Committee.
Brian ChinJames H. Gallegos4462
SeniorExecutive Vice President Planning and Strategy Integration. General Counsel. Mr. ChinGallegos joined the Company on April 1, 2022 as its SeniorExecutive Vice President Planning and Strategy Integration on June 20, 2017.General Counsel. Prior to joining the Company, from May 2013 to April 2017,since February 2020, Mr. ChinGallegos served as the leadExecutive Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Alliant Energy Corporation, a regulated, investor-owned public utility analystholding company, and its two utility subsidiaries (collectively, “Alliant Energy”). From February 2015 to February 2020, Mr. Gallegos served as Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Corporate Secretary of Alliant Energy. Prior to that, Mr. Gallegos served in various positions with U S WEST, Inc., which merged with Qwest Communications International Inc. in 2000.
John C. Griffith56
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Griffith joined the Company on May 16, 2022 as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Prior to joining the Company, since 2014, Mr. Griffith served as Managing Director, Mergers and Acquisitions, for the North America research function at Bank of America Securities’ Global Regulated Utilities and Renewable Energy practice. Prior to joining Bank of America Securities, from 2008 to 2014, Mr. Griffith served as the Chief Executive Officer of HighWave Energy, a renewable fuels start-up company, and from 1995 to 2008, he served in various capacities of increasing responsibility with Merrill Lynch. From 2001 to 2013, Mr. Chin worked in Electric Utilities Research at Citigroup. Within that period, Mr. Chin was the global head of Electric Utilities Research for Citigroup.Lynch & Co.
Deborah A. DegillioMelanie M. Kennedy4649
Executive Vice President, AWE. Chief Human Resources Officer. Ms. DegillioKennedy has been President of AWE since May 2016.From January 2015 to May 2016, Ms. Degillioserved as the Company’s Executive Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer since December 2021, and Treasurer.as Senior Vice President, Chief Human Resources Officer from December 2020 to December 2021. Prior to that, time, Ms. Degillio served as Vice President of Finance of AWE from November 2013 to February 2015, as a Vice President in the Company’s Finance team for its Eastern Division from June 2009 until October 2013, and as Director of Financial Planning and Analysis for American Water’s then Western states, from April 2007 until May 2009.

NameAgeOffice and Experience
Melanie M. Kennedy44
Senior Vice President, Human Resources. Since March 1, 2017, Ms. Kennedy hasshe served as the Company’s Senior Vice President, Human Resources.Resources from March 2017 to December 2020. From August 2014 untilthrough February 2017, Ms. Kennedy served as the Company's Vice President, Human Resources, of the Company, and from August 2012 to August 2014, she served as Director, Human Resources in ourthe Company’s Northeast Division. Ms. Kennedy initially joined the Company in 2007, and before that time, she practiced law for nine years.
Walter J. LynchCheryl Norton5558
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer.Mr. Lynch Ms. Norton has over 2030 years of experienceemployment with the Company serving in the watervarious roles, including operational leadership, environmental stewardship, laboratory management and wastewater industry. Mr. Lynchresearch. She has servedbeen serving as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since January 2016,March 2021 and served as its Senior Vice President, Chief OperatingEnvironmental Officer of Regulated Operations from February 2010March 2020 to December 2015,March 2021. She was also the Company’s Senior Vice President, Eastern Division and President of Regulated Operationsits New Jersey subsidiary from July 2008March 2019 to DecemberMarch 2021. Prior to that, Ms. Norton served as President of the Company’s Missouri subsidiary from November 2015 to March 2019, and President of its Kentucky subsidiary from January 2011 until November 2015. Mr. Lynch joined us in 2001. Mr. Lynch is onIn addition, Ms. Norton also serves as a member of the Board of Directors of the National Association of Water Companies and serves on its Executive Committee. In addition, Mr. Lynch also serves on the Water Research Foundation Board of Trustees.
Bradley A. Okoniewski51
Vice President, Safety and Environmental Leadership. Mr. Okoniewski joined the Company on May 1, 2017 as its Vice President, Safety and Environmental Leadership. Prior to that, from April 2016 to May 2017, Mr. Okoniewski served as the global environmental, occupational health and safety director for Campbell Soup Company, a publicly-traded consumer products company based in Camden, New Jersey. Prior to that, Mr. Okoniewski served as the global director, safety, health and environmental affairs for Carpenter Technology Company, a publicly-traded specialty metals company based in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, from February 2013 to March 2016.
Michael A. Sgro59
Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary. Mr. Sgro has over 20 years of experience in the water and wastewater industry. He has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary since January 1, 2016 and its Senior Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary from February 2015 to January 2016. Prior to that, he served as the Company’s Interim General Counsel and Secretary from January 2015 until February 2015 and as Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of American Water’s Northeast Division beginning in 2002.
Linda G. Sullivan54
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer. Ms. Sullivan has served as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since January 1, 2016 and the Company’s Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from May 2014 to December 31, 2015. Prior to joining American Water, Ms. Sullivan served as the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Southern California Edison Company, a subsidiary of Edison International, from July 2009 until May 2014, and Vice President and Controller of both Edison International and Southern California Edison Company, from July 2004 until July 2009. Ms. Sullivan is a Certified Public Accountant (inactive) and a Certified Management Accountant. On April 27, 2017, Ms. Sullivan was elected to the Board of Directors of NorthWestern Corp. and serves on its Audit Committee. In addition, Ms. Sullivan serves on the board of directors of University of Maryland University College Ventures and on its Audit & Finance Committee and is a member of the EPA’s Finance Advisory Board.
Radhakrishnan Swaminathan56
Senior Vice President, Chief Technology and Information Officer. Mr. Swaminathan has served as Senior Vice President, Chief Technology and Innovation Officer of the Company since November 1, 2017. Mr. Swaminathan joined the Company in March 2016 as our Chief Technology and Innovation Officer. Prior to that, from October 2012 through February 2016, he served as Vice President and Chief Technology Officer, Energy, Natural Resources and Utilities, of WIPRO Technologies. Prior to that, he served as the Director of Smart Grid Technologies at NextEra Energy, Inc. from January 2009 through September 2012.
Loyd “Aldie” Warnock58
Senior Vice President of External Affairs and Business Development. Mr. Warnock has served as the Company’s Senior Vice President of External Affairs and Business Development since August 1, 2017. From April 2014 to July 31, 2017, Mr. Warnock served as the Company’s Senior Vice President of External Affairs, Communications and Public Policy. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Senior Vice President of External Affairs at Midwest Independent System Operator, Inc., a non-profit, self-governing organization, from March 2011 to April 2014. Prior to that, he served as Vice President of External Affairs for Allegheny Energy, Inc. from December 2005 to February 2011 and Senior Vice President of Governmental and Regulatory Affairs at Mirant Corporation from July 2004 to November 2005. Mr. Warnock serves on the Board of Directors of the National Association of Water Companies and on the Executive Advisory Board of the Mississippi State University College of Business.
Melissa K. Wikle52
Vice President and Controller. Ms. Wikle joined the Company in July 2016 as its Vice President and Controller, and assumed the duties of the Company’s principal accounting officer in August 2016. Prior to joining the Company, Ms. Wikle served as Corporate Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of Columbus McKinnon Corporation, a publicly-traded worldwide designer, manufacturer and marketer of material handling products, systems and services, since April 2011. Ms. Wikle is a Certified Public Accountant.
Charles Witherspoon50
Vice President and Treasurer. Mr. Witherspoon has served as the Company’s Vice President and Treasurer since February 14, 2018 and has over 24 years of collective experience in corporate treasury, marketing, finance and audit roles. Mr. Witherspoon joined the Company in January 2016 as its Assistant Treasurer. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Witherspoon served as Vice President of Finance and Corporate Treasurer of Church & Dwight Co., Inc., a publicly-traded packaged goods company, from December 2007 to January 2016. Before that, Mr. Witherspoon held finance and treasury roles for Johnson & Johnson and FMC Corporation. Mr. Witherspoon is a Certified Public Accountant and a Certified Treasury Professional.Foundation.
Each executive officer is elected annually by the Board of Directors and serves until his or hertheir respective successor has been elected and qualified or his or hertheir earlier death, resignation or removal.



23

Available Information
We areThe Company is subject to the reporting requirements of the Exchange Act. We fileThe Company files or furnishfurnishes annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC. YouReaders may obtain a copy of our annual reportsthe Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reportsits Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q or our current reportsits Current Reports on Form 8-K, or any amendments to them, that are filed with or furnished to the SEC, free of charge, from the Investor Relations section of ourthe Company’s website, http:https://ir.amwater.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we filethe Company files or furnishfurnishes the information to the SEC.
The Company maintains a website at https://amwater.com. Information contained on ourthe Company’s website, including its Sustainability Report, its Inclusion, Diversity & Equity Annual Report, and other reports or documents, including the information and data on the Company’s diversity website https://Diversityataw.com, shall not be deemed incorporated into, or to be a part of, this report, and any website references included herein are not intended to be made through active hyperlinks. We recognize ourThe Company recognizes its website as a key channel of distribution to reach public investors and as a means of disclosing material non-public information to comply with our disclosure obligations under SEC Regulation FD.
The American Water corporate governance guidelines and the charters for each of the standing committees of the Board of Directors, together with the American Water Code of Ethics and additional information regarding ourthe Company’s corporate governance, are available on ourits Investor Relations website, http:https://ir.amwater.com, and will be made available, without charge, in print to any stockholdershareholder who requests such documents from ourits Investor Relations Department, American Water Works Company, Inc., 1025 Laurel Oak Road, Voorhees,1 Water Street, Camden, NJ, 08043.08102.


24

ITEM 1A.RISK FACTORS
ITEM 1A.    RISK FACTORS
We operate in a market and regulatory environment that involves significant risks, many of which are beyond our control. In addition to the other information included or incorporated by reference in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, the following material factors should be considered in evaluating our business and future prospects. Any of the following risks, either alone or taken together, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial position, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Risks Related to Our Industry and Business Operations
Our utility operationsRegulated Businesses are subject to extensive economic regulation by state PUCs and other regulatory agencies, which significantly affects our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Our utility operationsRegulated Businesses also may be subject to fines, penalties and other sanctions for thean inability to meet these regulatory requirements.

Our Regulated Businesses provide water and wastewater services to our customers through subsidiaries that are subject to economic regulation by state PUCs. EconomicThis regulation affects the rates we charge our customers and has a significant impact on our business and results of operations. Generally, the state PUCs authorize us to charge rates that they determine are sufficient to recover our prudently incurred operating expenses, including, but not limited to, operating and maintenance costs, depreciation, financing costs and taxes, and provide us with the opportunity to earn an appropriate rate of return on invested capital.
Our ability to successfully implement our business plan and strategy depends on the rates authorized by the various state PUCs. We periodically file rate increase applications with state PUCs. The ensuing administrative process may be lengthy and costly. Our rate increase requests may or may not be approved, or may be partially approved, and any approval may not occur in a timely manner. Moreover, a PUC may not approve a rate request toin an extentamount that is sufficient to:
cover our expenses, includingcost of operations, including: purchased waterwater; chemicals; and costs of chemicals, fuel, power and other commodities used in our operations;
cover our operational labor and labor-related expenses, including without limitation costs and expenses associated with our pension and other post-employment benefits;
enable us to recover our investment; and
provide us with an opportunity to earn an appropriate rate of return on our investment.
Approval ofby the PUCs is also required in connection with other aspects of our utilities’ operations.Regulated Businesses, which are required to have numerous permits, approvals and certificates from the PUCs that regulate their businesses and authorize acquisitions, dispositions, debt and/or equity financing, and, in certain cases, affiliated transactions. Some state PUCs are empowered to impose financial penalties, fines and other sanctions for non-compliance with applicable rules and regulations. Our utilities are also required to have numerous permits, approvals and certificates from the PUCs that regulate their businesses and authorize acquisitions. Although we believe that each utility subsidiary has obtained or sought renewal of the material permits, approvals and certificates necessary for its existing operations, we are unable to predict the impact that future regulatory activities may have on our business.
In any of these cases, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity may be adversely affected. Even if the rates approved are sufficient, we face the risk that we will not achieve the rates of return on our invested capital to the extent permitted by state PUCs. This could occur if certain conditions exist, including, but not limited to, if(i) water usage is less than the level anticipated in establishing rates, (ii) customers increase their conservation efforts, (iii) we experience unusual or ifemergent situations, events or conditions (including with respect to the COVID-19 pandemic), or (iv) our investments or expenses prove to be higher than the levellevels estimated in establishing rates.

It may be difficult to predict the outcome or impact of these events on us or the actions that may be taken by the PUCs or other governmental authorities in response thereto.
Our operations and the quality of water we supply are subject to extensive and increasingly stringent environmental, water quality and health and safety laws and regulations, including with respect to contaminants of emerging contaminants,concern, compliance with which could impact both our operating costs and capital expenditures, and violations of which could subject us to substantial liabilities and costs, as well as damage to our reputation.
Our water and wastewater operations and the operations of our Market-Based Businesses are subject to extensive federal, state and local laws and regulations and, in the case of our Canadian operations, Canadian laws and regulations that govern the protection of the environment, health and safety, the quality of the water we deliver to our customers, water allocation rights, and the manner in which we collect, treat, discharge and dispose of wastewater.regulations. These requirements include, among others, CERCLA, the Clean Water Act, and the Safe Drinking Water Act, the LCRR and similarother federal and state and Canadian laws and regulations.requirements. For example, CERCLA authorizes the EPA to issue orders and bring enforcement actions to compel responsible parties to investigate and take remedial actions with respect to actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances, and can impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault, on responsible parties for the costs thereof. We are also required to obtain various environmental permits from regulatory agencies for our operations.
In addition, state PUCs alsoand environmental regulators set conditions and standards for the water and wastewater services we deliver. If we deliver water or wastewater services to our customers that do not comply with regulatory standards, or otherwise violate environmental laws, regulations or permits, or other health and safety and water quality regulations, we could incur substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions or costs, as well as damage to our reputation. In the most serious cases, regulators could reduce requested rate increases or force us to discontinue operations and sell our operating assets to another utility or to a municipality. Given the nature of our business which, in part, involves supplyingproviding water service for human consumption, any potential non-compliance with, or violation of, environmental, water quality and health and safety laws or regulations would likely pose a more


25

significant risk to us than to a company not similarly involved in the water and wastewater industry.
In addition, CERCLA authorizes the EPA to issue orders and bring enforcement actions to compel responsible parties to investigate and take remedial actions with respect to actual or threatened releases of hazardous substances, and can impose joint and several liability, without regard to fault, on responsible parties for the costs thereof. We are also required to obtain various environmental permits from regulatory agencies for our operations.
We incur substantial operating and capital costs on an ongoing basis to comply with environmental, water quality and health and safety laws and regulations. These laws and regulations and their enforcement, generally have become more stringent over time, and new or stricter requirements could increase our costs. Although we may seek to recover ongoing compliance costs in our Regulated Businesses through customer rates, there can be no guarantee that the various state PUCs or similar regulatory bodies that govern our Regulated Businesses would approve rate increases that would enable us to recover such costs or that such costs will not materially and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
We may also incur liabilities if, under environmental laws and regulations, we are required to investigate and clean up environmental contamination, at our properties, including potential spillsreleases of hazardous chemicals, such as chlorine, which we use to treat water, or at off-site locations where we have disposed of residual waste or caused an adverse environmental impact. The discovery of previously unknown conditions, or the imposition of cleanup obligations in the future, could result in significant costs and could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity. Such remediation costs may not be covered by insurance and may make it difficult for us to secure insurance at acceptable rates in the future.
Attention is being given to contaminants of emerging contaminants,concern, including, without limitation, chemicals and other substances that currently do not have any regulatory standard in drinking water or have been recently created or discovered (including by means of scientific achievements in the analysis and detection of trace amounts of substances). Examples of sources of emerging contaminants include, but are not limited to, newly created chemical compounds (including, for example, perfluorinated compounds and manufactured nanomaterials); human and veterinary products; perfluorinated and polyfluorinated compounds; bacteria, microbes, viruses (including COVID-19), amoebae and other pathogens; and residual by-products of disinfection. We rely upon governmental agencies to set appropriate regulatory standards to protect the public from these and other contaminants. Ourcontaminants, and our role is to meet or surpass thoseprovide service that meets these standards, when established.if any. In some of our states, PUCs may disapprove of cost recovery, in whole or in part, for implementation of treatment infrastructure for an emerginga contaminant in the absence of a regulatory standard. Furthermore, given the rapid pace at which emergingthese contaminants are being created and/or discovered, we may not be able to detect and/or mitigate all such substances in our drinking water system or supplies, which could have a material adverse impact on our financial condition, results of operations and reputation. In addition, we believe emergingthese contaminants may form the basis for additional or increased federal or state regulatory initiatives and requirements in the future, which could significantly increase the cost of our operations.

Limitations on availability of water supplies or restrictions on our use of water supplies as a resultbecause of government regulation or action may adversely affect our access to sources of water, our ability to supply water to customers or the demand for our water services.
Our ability to meet the existing and future demand of our customers depends on the availability of an adequate supply of water. As a general rule, sources of public water supply, including rivers, lakes, streams, and groundwater aquifers and recycled water sources, are held in the public trust and are not generally owned by private interests. As a result, we typically do not own the source water that we use in our operations, and the availability of our water supply is established through allocation rights (determined by legislation or court decisions) and passing-flow requirements set by governmental entities. Passing-flow requirements set minimum volumes ofentities or by entering into water that must pass through specified water sources, such as rivers and streams, in order to maintain environmental habitats and meet water allocation rights of downstream users. Allocation rights are imposed to ensure sustainability of major water sources and passing-flow requirements are most often imposed on source waters from smaller rivers, lakes and streams.purchase agreements. These requirements, which can change from time to time, and vary by state or region, may adversely impact our water supply. Supply issues, such as drought, overuse of sources of water, the protection of threatened species or habitats, contamination or other factors may limit the availability of ground and surface water. If we are unable to secure available or alternative sources of water, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected.
For example, in our Monterey County, California operations, we are seeking to augment our sources of water supply, principally to comply with an October 20, 2009the cease and desist orderorders issued by the SWRCB in July 1995 and October 2009 (the “1995 Order,” the “2009 Order”), and, as amended by an order in July 2016, (thethe “2016 Order”), of and, collectively, the SWRCB“Orders”) that requiresrequire Cal Am to significantly decrease its diversions from the Carmel River in accordance with a reduction schedule that terminatesterminated on December 31, 2021 (the “2021 Deadline”).2021. See Item 3—Legal Proceedings—Alternative Water Supply in Lieu of Carmel River Diversions, which includes additional information regarding this matter. We are also required to augment our Monterey County sources of water supply to comply with the requirements of the Endangered Species Act. We cannot predict whetherFor 2022, Cal Am willcomplied with the diversion limitations contained in the 2016 Order, but continued compliance with these limitations in 2023 and future years may be able to secure alternative sourcesimpacted by a number of factors, including without limitation continued drought conditions in California and the exhaustion of water supply reserves, and will require successful development of alternate water supply sources sufficient to meet customer demand. While the Company cannot currently predict the likelihood or ifresult of any adverse outcome associated with these matters, further attempts to comply with the Orders may result in material


26

additional costs or obligations, including fines and penalties against Cal Am will be exposed to liabilities if it is unable to meetin the 2021 Deadline underevent of noncompliance with the 2009 OrderOrders, which could have a material adverse effect upon us and the 2016 Order. If Cal Am or any of our other subsidiaries are unable to secure an alternative source of water, or if other adverse consequences result from the events described above, our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows could be adversely affected. See Item 3—Legal Proceedings—Alternative Water Supply in Lieu of Carmel River Diversions, which includes additional information regarding this matter.
The current regulatory rate setting process may result in a significant delay, also known as “regulatory lag,” from the time that we invest in infrastructure improvements, incur increased operating expenses or experience declining water usage, to the time at which we can seek to address these events in rate case applications; our inability to minimize regulatory lag could adversely affect our business.
There is typically a delay, known as “regulatory lag,” between the time one of our regulated subsidiaries makes a capital investment or incurs an operating expense increase and the time when those costs are reflected in rates. In addition, billings permitted by state PUCs typically are, to a considerable extent, based on the volume of water usage in addition to a minimum base rate. Thus, we may experience regulatory lag between the time our revenues are affected by declining usage and the time we are able to adjust the rate per gallon of usage to address declining usage. Our inability to reduce this regulatory lag could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
We endeavor to reduce regulatory lag by pursuing constructive regulatory policies. For example, ten of our state PUCs permit rates to be adjusted outside of the rate case application process through surcharges that address certain capital investments, such as replacement of aging infrastructure. These surcharges are adjusted periodically based on factors such as project completion or future budgeted expenditures, and specific surcharges are eliminated once the related capital investment is incorporated in new PUC approved rates. Furthermore, in setting rates, nine of our state PUCs allow us to use future test years, which extend beyond the date a rate request is filed to allow for current or projected revenues, expenses and investments to be reflected in rates on a more timely basis. Other examples of such programs include states that allow us to increase rates for certain cost increases that are beyond our control, such as purchased water costs, property or other taxes, or power, conservation, chemical or other expenditures. These surcharge mechanisms enable us to adjust rates in less time after costs have been incurred than would be the case under the rate case application process.     
While these programs have reduced regulatory lag in several of our regulated states, we continue to seek expansion of programs to reduce regulatory lag in those jurisdictions that have not approved such programs. Furthermore, PUCs may fail to adopt new surcharge programs and existing programs may not continue in their current form, or at all. Although we intend to continue our efforts to expand state PUC approval of surcharges to address issues of regulatory lag, our efforts may not be successful, or even if successful they may not completely address our regulatory lag, in which case our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity may be materially and adversely affected.

Changes in laws and regulations and changes in certain agreements can significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
New legislation, regulations, government policies or court decisions, including without limitation with respect to federal and state income and other tax laws, can materially affect our operations, results of operations and cash flows. The individuals who serve as regulators are elected or political appointees. Therefore, elections which result in a change of political administration or new appointments may also result in changes in the individuals who serve as regulators and the policies of the regulatory agencies that they serve. New laws or regulations, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, changes in agency policy, including those made in response to shifts in public opinion, or conditions imposed during the regulatory hearing process could have the following consequences, among others:
making it more difficult for us to raise our rates and, as a consequence, to recover our costs or earn our expected rates of return;
changing the determination of the costs, or the amount of costs, that would be considered recoverable in rate cases;
restricting our ability to terminate our services to customers who owe us money for services previously provided or limiting our bill collection efforts;
requiring us to provide water or wastewater services at reduced rates to certain customers;
limiting or restricting our ability to acquire water or wastewater systems, purchase or dispose of assets or issue securities, or making it less cost-effective for us to do so;
negatively impacting the deductibility of expenses under federal or state tax laws, the amount of tax credits or tax abatement benefits that may be available, the amount of taxes owed, or the ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards;
changing regulations that affect the benefits we expected to receive when we began offering services in a particular area;
increasing the costs associated with complying with environmental, health, safety and water quality regulations to which our operations are subject;
changing or placing additional limitations on change in control requirements relating to any concentration of ownership of our common stock;
making it easier for governmental entities to convert our assets to public ownership via condemnation, eminent domain or other similar process, or for governmental agencies or private plaintiffs to assess liability against us for damages under these or similar processes;
placing limitations, prohibitions or other requirements with respect to the sharing of information and participation in transactions by or between a regulated subsidiary and us or our other affiliates, including Service Company and any of our other subsidiaries;
restricting or prohibiting our extraction of water from rivers, streams, reservoirs or aquifers; and
revoking or altering the terms of the certificates of public convenience and necessity (or similar authorizations) issued to us by state PUCs.
Any of the foregoing consequences could have an adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.

In addition, new Federal, state and local laws, changes in existing laws, rules or regulations, or administrative interpretations thereof, could impact us. On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law, which, among other things, enacted significant and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as of January 1, 2018, and certain other provisions related specifically to the public utility industry, including continuation of interest expense deductibility, the exclusion from utilizing bonus depreciation and the normalization of deferred income taxes. The enactment of the TCJA required a re-measurement of our deferred income taxes that materially impacted our 2017 results of operations and financial position. We have assumed that the predominant majority of our deferred tax assets and liabilities at our utility subsidiaries will remain subject to a normalization method of accounting pursuant to the U.S. tax code or applicable PUC regulations and that we will be able to deduct for U.S. federal corporate income tax purposes substantially all of our interest expense, based upon our interpretation of U.S. tax law debt allocation methodologies , at the TCJA’s 21% corporate tax rate. The adoption or issuance of any Related Interpretations that impact these assumptions or with respect to provisions related specifically to the public utility industry or to corporate taxpayers in general may also impact our future financial performance, including our results of operations, cash flows and liquidity, which impacts will largely be determined through future regulatory proceedings. All of our 14 jurisdictions subject to economic regulation have opened formal proceedings related to the TCJA, and we have open rate cases in three of them. At this time, we cannot predict the impacts of any Related Interpretations, if and when issued, on us, or the regulatory treatment of the TCJA in each of our regulatory jurisdictions. Moreover, we are unable to determine or predict the potential impacts, if any, of any other new or amended laws, rules or regulations, or interpretations thereof, to the extent they may be ultimately enacted, adopted or issued, on us or our businesses, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Service disruptions caused by severe weather conditions, climate variability patterns or natural or other disasters may disrupt our operations or reduce the demand for our water services, which could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Service interruptions due to severe weather, climate variability patterns and natural or other natural events are possible across all our businesses. These include, among other things, storms, freezing conditions, high wind conditions, hurricanes, tornadoes, earthquakes, landslides, drought, wildfires, coastal and intercoastal floods or high water conditions, including those in or near designated flood plains, pandemics (including COVID-19) and epidemics, severe electrical storms, sinkholes and solar flares. Weather and other natural events such as these may affect the condition or operability of our facilities, limiting or preventing us from delivering water or wastewater services to our customers, or requiring us to make substantial capital expenditures to repair any damage. Tariffs in place or cost recovery proceedings with respect to our Regulated Businesses may not provide reimbursement to us, in whole or in part, for any of these impacts.
Government restrictions on water use may also result in decreased use of water services, even if our water supplies are sufficient to serve our customers, which may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Seasonal and other drought conditions, including, for example, those currently being experienced in California, that may impact our water services are possible across all of our service areas. Governmental restrictions imposed in response to a drought may apply to all systems within a region independent of the supply adequacy of any individual system. As examples, drought conditions had persisted in California over a five-year period, and had been declared in New Jersey in 2016. In 2017, these droughts were declared concluded, but other droughts thatResponses may occurrange from timevoluntary to time may result in the imposition of voluntary or mandatory water use targets,restrictions, rationing restrictions, water conservation regulations, and requirements to minimize water system leaks. While expenses incurred in implementing water conservation and rationing plans may generally be recoverable provided the relevant PUC determines they were reasonable and prudent, we cannot assurebe certain that any such expenses incurred will, in fact, be fully recovered. Moreover, reductions in water consumption, including those resulting from installation of equipment or changed consumer behavior, may persist even after a drought has ended and restrictions are repealed and the drought has ended,lifted, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Climate variability may cause increased volatility in weather and may impact water usage and related revenue or require additional expenditures, all of which may not be fully recoverable in rates or otherwise.
The issue of climate variability is receiving increasing attention nationally and worldwide. Some scientific experts are predicting aThere is consensus among climate scientists that there will be worsening of weather volatility in the future associated with climate variability. Many climate variability predictions if true, present several potential challenges to water and wastewater utilities, including us, such as:
increased frequency and duration of droughts;
increased precipitation and flooding;
increased frequency and severity of storms and other weather events;
challenges associated with changes in temperature or increases in ocean levels;
potential degradation of water quality;
decreases in available water supply and changes in water usage patterns;
increases in disruptions in service;
increased costs to repair damaged facilities; or

increased costs to reduce risks associated with the increasing frequency and severity of natural events, including to improve the resiliency and reliability of our water production and deliverywastewater treatment and conveyance facilities and systems.
Because of the uncertainty of weather volatility related to climate variability, we cannot predict its potential impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity. Furthermore, laws and regulations have been enacted or proposed that seek to reduce or limit greenhouse gas emissions and require or would require additional reporting and monitoring, and these regulations may become more pervasive or stringent in light of changing governmental agendas and priorities, although the exact nature and timing of these changes is uncertain. Although some or all potential expenditures and costs associated with respect tothe impact of climate variability and related laws and regulations on our Regulated Businesses could be recovered through rates, infrastructure replacement surcharges or other regulatory mechanisms, there can be no assurance that state PUCs would authorize rate increases to enable us to recover such expenditures and costs, in whole or in part.


27

The current regulatory rate setting process may result in a significant delay, also known as “regulatory lag,” from the time that we invest in infrastructure improvements, incur increased operating expenses as a result of inflation or other factors, incur increased cost of capital, including as a result of increasing short- and long-term rates, or experience declining water usage, to the time at which we can seek to address these events in rate case applications; our inability to mitigate or minimize regulatory lag could adversely affect our business.
There is typically a delay, known as “regulatory lag,” between the time our Regulated Businesses make a capital investment or incur an operating expense increase and the time when those costs are reflected in rates. In addition, billings permitted by state PUCs typically are, to a considerable extent, based on the volume of water usage in addition to a minimum base rate. Thus, we may experience regulatory lag between the time our revenues are affected by declining usage and the time we are able to adjust the rate per gallon of usage to address declining usage. Our inability to mitigate or reduce regulatory lag could have an adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
We endeavor to mitigate or reduce regulatory lag by pursuing constructive regulatory practices. For example, two of our states have approved revenue stability mechanisms that adjust rates periodically to ensure that a utility’s revenue will be sufficient to cover its costs regardless of sales volume, including recognition of declining sales resulting from reduced consumption, while providing an incentive for customers to use water more efficiently. In addition, 10 of our state PUCs permit rates to be adjusted outside of the general rate case application process through surcharges that address certain capital investments, such as replacement of aging infrastructure. These surcharges are adjusted periodically based on factors such as project completion or future budgeted expenditures, and specific surcharges are eliminated once the related capital investment is incorporated in new PUC approved rates. Furthermore, in setting rates, nine of our state PUCs allow us to use future test years, which extend beyond the date a rate request is filed to allow for current or projected revenues, expenses and investments to be reflected in rates on a more timely basis. Other examples of such regulatory practices include expense mechanisms that allow us to increase rates for certain cost increases that are beyond our control, such as purchased water costs, property or other taxes, or power, conservation, chemical or other expenditures. These mechanisms enable us to adjust rates in less time after costs have been incurred than would be the case under a general rate case application process without the mechanisms.
While these mechanisms have mitigated or reduced regulatory lag in several of our regulated states, we continue to seek approval of regulatory practices to mitigate or reduce regulatory lag in those jurisdictions that have not approved them. Furthermore, PUCs may fail to adopt new surcharges and existing mechanisms may not continue in their current form, or at all, or we may be unable or become ineligible to continue to utilize certain of these mechanisms in the future. Although we intend to continue our efforts to seek state PUC approval of constructive regulatory practices to mitigate or reduce regulatory lag, our efforts may not be successful, or even if partially successful, our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity may be materially and adversely affected.
Changes in laws and regulations can significantly and materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
The impact of any future revisions or changes in interpretations of existing regulations or the adoption of new laws and regulations applicable to our Regulated Businesses is uncertain. Changes in laws or regulations, the imposition of additional laws and regulations, changes in enforcement practices of regulators, government policies or court decisions can materially affect our operations, results of operations and cash flows. Certain of the individuals who serve as regulators are elected or political appointees. Therefore, elections which result in a change of political administration or new appointments may also result in changes of the individuals who serve as regulators and changes in the policies of the regulatory agencies that they serve. New laws or regulations, new interpretations of existing laws or regulations, changes in agency policy, including those made in response to shifts in public opinion, or conditions imposed during the regulatory hearing process could have the following consequences, among others:
making it more difficult for us to increase our rates and, as a consequence, to recover our costs or earn our expected rates of return;
changing the determination of the costs, or the amount of costs, that would be considered recoverable in rate cases and other regulatory proceedings;
restricting our ability to terminate our services to customers who owe us money for services previously provided or limiting our bill collection efforts;
requiring us to provide water or wastewater services at reduced rates to certain customers;
limiting or restricting our ability to acquire water or wastewater systems, purchase or dispose of assets, or issue long-term debt or equity, or making it less cost-effective for us to do so;
negatively impacting, among other things: (i) tax rates or positions or the deductibility of expenses under federal or state tax laws, (ii) the availability or amount of, or our ability to comply with the terms and conditions of, tax credits or tax


28

abatement benefit, (iii) the amount of taxes owed, (iv) the timing of tax effects on rates or (v) the ability to utilize our net operating loss carryforwards;
changing regulations that affect the benefits we expected to receive when we began offering services in a particular area;
increasing the associated costs of, or difficulty complying with, environmental, health, safety, consumer privacy, water quality, and water quality accountability laws and regulations to which our operations are subject;
changing or placing additional limitations on change in control requirements relating to any concentration of ownership of our common stock;
making it easier for governmental entities to convert our assets to public ownership via condemnation, eminent domain or other similar process, or for governmental agencies or private plaintiffs to assess liability against us for damages under these or similar processes;
increasing the costs or difficulty of complying with proposed changes to federal contractor affirmative action audits;
placing limitations, prohibitions or other requirements with respect to the sharing of information and participation in transactions by or between a regulated subsidiary and us or our other affiliates, including Service Company and any of our other subsidiaries;
restricting or prohibiting our extraction of water from rivers, streams, reservoirs or aquifers; and
revoking or altering the terms of a CPCN issued to us by a state PUC or other governmental authority.
Regulatory and environmental risks associated with the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater may impose significant costs and liabilities.
The wastewater collection, treatment and disposal operations of our subsidiaries are subject to substantial regulation and involve environmental risks. If collection, treatment or disposal systems fail, overflow, or do not operate properly, untreated or inadequately treated wastewater or other contaminants could spill onto nearby properties or into nearby streams and rivers, causing damage to persons or property, injury to aquatic life and economic damages. This risk is most acute during periods of substantial rainfall or flooding, which are the main causes of sewer overflow and system failure. Liabilities resulting from such damage could adversely and materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Certain of our wastewater systems have commercial and industrial customers that are subject to specific limitations on the type, character and strength of the wastewater they are permitted to discharge into our systems. The failure by these commercial and industrial customers to comply with their respective discharge requirements could, in turn, negatively impact our operations, damage our facilities or cause us to exceed applicable discharge limitations and requirements. Liabilities resulting from such exceedance events could adversely and materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
A loss of one or more large industrial or commercial customers could have a material adverse impact upon the results of operations of one or more of our Regulated Businesses.
Adverse economic conditions or other factors canmay cause our customers, particularly industrial and large commercial customers, to curtail operations. A curtailment of operations by an industrialsuch a customer would typically resultresults in reduced water usage by that customer. In more severe circumstances, the decline in usage could be permanent. Any decrease in demand resulting from difficult economic conditions affecting these industrial customers could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Tariffs in place with respect to our Regulated Businesses may not reimburse us, in whole or in part, for any of these impacts.

Our Regulated Businesses require significant capital expenditures and may suffer if we fail to secure appropriate funding to make investments, experience increases in short- and long-term interest rates or if we experience delays in completing major capital expenditure projects.
The water and wastewater utility business is capital intensive. We invest significant amounts of capital to add, replace and maintain property, plant and equipment, and to improve aging infrastructure. In 2017,2022, we invested $1.4$2.3 billion in net Company-funded capital improvements. The level of capital expenditures necessary to maintain the integrity of our systems will likely increase incontinue into the future.future and, we believe, will increase. We expect to fund capital improvement projects using cash generated from operations (including, among other things, a portion of the net proceeds from the sale of HOS) borrowings under our revolving credit facility and commercial paper programs and issuances of long-term debt.debt and equity. We may not be able to access our revolving credit facility or the commercial paper, long-term debt and equity capital markets, when necessary or desirable to fund capital improvements on favorable terms or at all. If we are not able to obtain sufficient financing, we couldmay be unable to maintain our existing property, plant and equipment, fund our capital investment strategies meet our growth targets andor expand our rate base to enable us to earn satisfactory future returns onmeet our investments.growth targets. Even with adequate financial resources to make required capital expenditures, we face the additional risk that we will not complete our major capital projects on time, as a result of supply chain interruptions, construction delays, permitting delays, labor shortages or other disruptions, environmental restrictions, legal and regulatory challenges, or other obstacles. Each of these outcomes could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.


29

Aging infrastructure may lead to service disruptions, property damage and increased capital expenditures and O&M expenses and other costs, all of which could negatively impact our financial results.
We have risks associated with aging infrastructure, including water and sewer mains, pumping stations and water and wastewater treatment facilities. Additionally, we may have limited information regarding buried and newly acquired assets, which could challenge our ability to conduct efficient asset management and maintenance practices. Assets that have aged beyond their expected useful lives may experience a higher rate of failure. Failure of aging infrastructure could result in increased capital expenditures and O&M expenses and other costs, and negatively impact our future O&M efficiency ratio. In addition, failure of aging infrastructure may result in property damage, and in safety, environmental and public health impacts. To the extent that any increased costs or expenditures are not fully recovered in rates, our results of operations, liquidity and cash flows could be negatively impacted.
Seasonality could adversely affect the volume of water sold and our revenues.
The volume of water we sell during the warmer months, typically in the summer, is generally greater than during other months, due primarily to increased water usage for irrigation systems, swimming pools, cooling systems and other applications. Throughout the year, and particularly during typically warmer months, the volume of water sold tends to vary with temperature, rainfall levels and rainfall frequency. In the event that temperatures during the typically warmer months are cooler than normal, or if there is more rainfall than normal, the amount of water we sell may decrease and adversely affect our revenues.
Three Two of our jurisdictions, California and Illinois, and New York,currently have adopted revenue stability mechanisms whichthat permit us to collect state PUC-authorized revenue forrecover the revenues authorized in a given period which is not tied to the volumegeneral rate case, regardless of water sold during that period.sales volume. Revenue stability mechanisms are designed to allow utilitiesrecognize declining sales resulting from reduced consumption, while providing an incentive for customers to recover the fixed cost of operations while supportinguse water conservation goals.more efficiently. In those jurisdictions that have not adopted a revenue stability mechanism, our operating results could continue to be affected by seasonality.
Regulatory and environmental risks associated with the collection, treatment and disposal of wastewater may impose significant costs.
The wastewater collection, treatment and disposal operations of our subsidiaries are subject to substantial regulation and involve environmental risks. If collection, treatment or disposal systems fail, overflow, or do not operate properly, untreated wastewater or other contaminants could spill onto nearby properties or into nearby streams and rivers, causing damage to persons or property, injury to aquatic life and economic damages. This risk is most acute during periods of substantial rainfall or flooding, which are the main causes of sewer overflow and system failure. Liabilities resulting from such damage could adversely and materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Contamination of water supplies or our water service provided to our customers could result in service limitations and interruptions and exposure to substances not typically found in potable water supplies, and could subject us and our subsidiaries to reductions in usage and other responsive obligations, government enforcement actions, damage to our reputation and private litigation.
The water supplies that flow into our treatment plants or are delivered through our distribution system, or the water service that is provided to our customers, may be subject to contamination, including, among other items, contamination from naturally-occurring compounds, chemicals in groundwater systems, pollution resulting from man-mademanufactured sources (such as perchlorate, perfluorinated and polyfluorinated compounds, methyl tertiary butyl ether, 1,4-dioxane, lead and other materials, or chemical spills or other accidentsincidents that result in contaminants entering the water source), and possible terrorist attacks.attacks or other similar incidents. In addition, new categories of these substancescontaminants continue to emerge in the water treatment industry. If one of our water supplies or the water service provided to our customers is contaminated, depending on the nature of the contamination, we may have to take responsive actions that could include, among other things (1) continuing limitedlimiting use of the water supply under a “Do Not Use” protective order that enables continuation of basic sanitation and essential fire protection, or (2) interrupting the use of that water supply.supply, in whole or in part, potentially impacting basic sanitation and fire protection needs. If service is disrupted, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and reputation may be adversely affected. In addition, we may incur significant costs in order to treat the contaminated source through the expansion of our current treatment facilities or the development of new sources of supply or new treatment methods. We may be unable to recover costs associated with treating or decontaminating water supplies through insurance, customer rates, tariffs or contract terms. Anyterms, and any recovery of these costs that we are able to obtain through regulatory proceedings or otherwise may not occur in a timely manner. Moreover, we could be subject to claims for damages arising from government enforcement actions or toxic tort or other lawsuits arising out of an interruption of service or human exposure to hazardous substances in our drinking water and water supplies.
In this regard, on January 9, 2014, a chemical storage tank owned by Freedom Industries, Inc. leaked two substances into the Elk River near the West Virginia-American Water Company (“WVAWC”) treatment plant intake in Charleston, West Virginia. On September 21, 2017, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia granted preliminary approval of a settlement class and proposed global class action settlement (the “Settlement”) of claims involving WVAWC and its affiliates arising out of the Freedom Industries chemical spill. Under the terms of the Settlement, WVAWC has agreed that it will not seek rate recovery from the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (the “PSC”) for the amounts paid by WVAWC, net of insurance recoveries, under the Settlement. See Item 3—Legal Proceedings—West Virginia Elk River Freedom Industries Chemical Spill, which includes additionalProceedings for information regarding this matter.on certain pending lawsuits related to interruptions of water service.
Since we engageare engaged in the business of providing water service to our customers, contamination of the water supply, or the water service provided to our customers, could result in substantial injury or damage to our customers, employees or others and we could be exposed to substantial claims and litigation. Such claims could relate to, among other things, personal injury, loss of life, business interruption, property damage, pollution, and environmental damage and may be brought by our customers or third parties. Litigation and regulatory proceedings are subject to inherent uncertainties and unfavorable rulings can and do occur, and weoccur. We may not be protected from these claims or negative impacts therefromof these claims in whole or in part by tariffs or other contract terms. Negative impacts to our reputation may occur even if we are not liable for any contamination or other environmental damage or the consequences arising out of human exposure to contamination or hazardous substances inwithin the water supply or water supplies.distributed finished drinking water. In addition, insurance coverage may not cover all or a portion of these losses, and are subject to deductibles and other limitations. Pending or future claims against us could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We may sustain losses that exceed or are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are self-insured.

We maintain insurance coverage as part
30

Table of our overall legal and risk management strategy to minimize potential liabilities arising from our utility operations, as well as the operations of our Market-Based Businesses. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits, exclusions and maximums, and insurance companies may seek to deny claims we might make. Generally, our insurance policies cover property damage, worker’s compensation, employer’s liability, general liability, terrorism risks and automobile liability. Each policy includes deductibles or self-insured retentions and policy limits for covered claims. As a result, we may sustain losses that exceed or that are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are self-insured.Contents
Although in the past we have been generally able to cover our insurance needs, there can be no assurance that we can secure all necessary or appropriate insurance in the future, or that such insurance can be economically secured. For example, catastrophic events can result in decreased coverage limits, more limited coverage, increased premium costs or deductibles.

We are subject to adverse publicity and reputational risks, which make us vulnerable to negative customer perception and could lead to increased regulatory oversight or other sanctions.
WaterOur business and wastewater utilities, including our regulated subsidiaries and our Market-Based Businesses,operations have a large direct and indirect customer base and, as a result, we are exposed to public criticism regarding, among other things, the reliability of their water service, wastewater and related or ancillary services, the quality of water provided, and the amount, timeliness, content, accuracy and format of bills that are provided for such services. Adverse publicity and negative consumer sentiment arising out of our operations may render legislatures and other governing bodies, state PUCs and other regulatory authorities, and government officials less likely to view us in a favorable light, and may cause us to be susceptible to less favorable legislative, regulatory and economic outcomes, as well as increased regulatory or other oversight and more stringent regulatory or economic requirements. Unfavorable regulatory and economic outcomes may include the enactment of more stringent laws and regulations governing our operations and less favorable economic terms in our agreements related to our Market-Based Businesses, asMSG, as well as fines, penalties or other sanctions or requirements. The imposition of any of the foregoing could have a material negative impact on us and our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
The failure of, or the requirement to repair, upgrade or dismantle, any of our dams may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
The properties of our Regulated Businesses segment include 8073 dams, athe majority of which are earthen dams. The failure of any of whichthese dams could result in personal injury and property damage, including without limitation downstream property damage, for which we may be liable. The failure of a dam would also adversely affect our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our customers and could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. Any losses or liabilities incurred due to a failure of one of our dams might not be covered by insurance policies or be recoverable in rates, and such losses may make it difficult for us to secure insurance at acceptable rates in the future.
We also are required from time to time to decommission, repair or upgrade the dams that we own. The cost of such repairs or upgrades can be and has been material. The federal and state agencies that regulate our operations may adopt rules and regulations requiring us to dismantle our dams, which also could entail material costs. Although in most cases the PUC has permitted recovery of expenses and capital investment related to dam rehabilitation, we might not be able to recover costs of repairs, upgrades or dismantling through rates in the future. The inability to recover these costs or delayed recovery of the costs as a result of regulatory lag can affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
Any failure of our network of water and wastewater pipes, water mains and water reservoirs could result in losses and damages that may affect our financial condition and reputation.
Our operating subsidiaries distribute water and collect wastewater through an extensive network of pipes, water mains and storage systems located across the United States. A failure of major pipes, mains or reservoirs could result in injuries, property and propertyother damage for which we may be liable. The failure of major pipes, mains and reservoirs may also result in the need to shut down some facilities or parts of our network in order to conduct repairs. Such failures and shutdowns may limit our ability to supply water in sufficient quantities to our customers and to meet the water and wastewater delivery requirements prescribed by government regulators, including state PUCs with jurisdiction over our operations, and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and reputation. Any business interruption or other losses might not be covered by insurance policies or be recoverable in rates, and such losses may make it difficult for us to secure insurance at acceptable rates in the future. Moreover, to the extent such business interruptions or other losses are not covered by insurance, they may not be recovered through rate adjustments.
An important part of our growth strategy is the acquisition of water and wastewater systems, which involves risks, including competition for acquisition opportunities from other regulated utilities, governmental entities and other buyers, thatwhich may hinder or limit our ability to grow our business.
An important element of our growth strategy is the acquisition and optimization of water and wastewater systems in order to broaden our current, and move into new, service areas. We may not be able to acquire other systems or businesses if we cannot identify suitable acquisition opportunities or reach mutually agreeable terms with acquisition candidates. candidates, and whether or not any particular acquisition is successfully completed, these activities are expensive and time consuming and are subject to the availability of capital and personnel resources to complete such acquisitions.
Further, competition for acquisition opportunities from other regulated utilities, governmental entities and other strategic and financial buyers may hinder our ability to expand our business. As consolidation activity increases in the water and wastewater industries and competition for acquisitions continues to increase, the prices for suitable acquisition candidates may increase and limit our ability to expand through acquisitions.
The negotiation and execution of potential acquisitions as well as the integration of acquired systems or businesses with our existing operations could require us to incur significant costs, and cause diversion of our management’s time and resources.resources and have a material adverse impact on our results of operations. Future acquisitions by us could result in, among other things:


31

unanticipated capital expenditures;
unanticipated acquisition-related expenses;
incurrence or assumption of debt, contingent liabilities and environmental liabilities of or with respect to an acquired business,and obligations, including liabilities that were unknown or undisclosed at the time of acquisition;
failure to recover acquisition premiums;adjustments or premiums due to unfavorable decisions by PUCs and other governmental authorities;
unanticipated capital expenditures;

failure to maintain effective internal control over financial reporting;
recording goodwill and other intangible assets at values that ultimately may be subject to impairment charges;
fluctuations in quarterly and/or annual results;
unanticipated acquisition-related expenses;
failure to realize anticipated benefits and synergies, such as cost savings and revenue enhancements; and
difficulties in integrating or assimilating acquired systems’ operations, personnel, benefits, services and systems.systems and water quality, cybersecurity and infrastructure protection measures.
Some or all of these items could have a material adverse effect on our business. The systems and businesses we acquire in the future may not achieve anticipated sales andrevenue, return on equity or profitability, or other perceived synergies, and any difficulties we encounter in the integration process could interfere with our operations, reduce our operating marginsnet income and profitability or adversely affect our internal control over financial reporting.
We compete with governmental entities, other regulated utilities, and strategic and financial buyers for acquisition opportunities. If consolidation becomes more prevalent in the water and wastewater industries and competition for acquisitions increases, the prices for suitable acquisition candidates may increase and limit our ability to expand through acquisitions.
Our Regulated Businesses are subject to condemnation and other proceedings through eminent domain or other similar authorized process, which could materially and adversely affect their results of operations and financial condition.
Municipalities and other government subdivisions have historically been involved in the provision of water and wastewater services in the United States, and organized efforts may arise from time to time in one or more of the service areas in which our Regulated Businesses operate to convert our assets to public ownership and operation through exercise of the governmental power of eminent domain, or another similar authorized process. Should aA municipality, or other government subdivision or a citizen group may seek to acquire our assets through eminent domain or such other process, either directly or indirectly as a result of a citizen petition, we may resistpetition.
For example, in November 2018, Monterey, California ballot Measure J, which was added by a citizens group, was certified as having been approved by a public vote, requiring the acquisition.MPWMD to conduct a study and submit a written plan concerning the feasibility of a potential purchase of the Monterey system assets without an additional public vote. The public vote led to the issuance by the MPWMD of (i) a preliminary report finding, among other things, that the acquisition of the Monterey system assets by the MPWMD would be economically feasible, and (ii) a final environmental impact report analyzing the environmental impacts of such an acquisition through the power of eminent domain. See Item 1—Business—Regulated Businesses—Condemnation and Eminent Domain and Item 3—Legal Proceedings—Proposed Acquisition of Monterey System Assets — Local Area Formation Commission Litigation, which includes additional information regarding these matters.
Furthermore, the law in certain jurisdictions in which our Regulated Businesses operate including, for example, California, provideprovides for eminent domain rights allowing private property owners to file a lawsuit to seek just compensation against a public utility, if the public utility’s infrastructure has been determined to be a substantial cause of damage to that property. In these actions, the plaintiff would not have to prove that the public utility acted negligently. These actionsIn California, lawsuits have occurredbeen filed in connection with large-scale natural events such as floods, mudslides and debris flow, broken water mains, landslides and wild and brush fires.wildfires. Some of these lawsuits have included allegations that infrastructure of certain utilities triggered the natural event that resulted in damage to the property. In some cases, the PUC has disallowed recovery in rates of losses incurred by these utilities as a result of such lawsuits.
Contesting an exercise of condemnation, eminent domain or other similar process, or responding to a citizen petition, may result in costly legal proceedings and may divert the attention of management of affected Regulated Businesses from the operation of those businesses.management. Moreover, our efforts to resist the condemnation, eminent domain or other process may not be successful, which may require us to sell the operations at issue in a condemnation proceeding or to pay a private property owner compensation for the property damage suffered. If a municipality or other government subdivision succeeds in acquiring the assets of one or more of our Regulated Businesses through eminent domain or other process, there is a risk that we will not receive adequate compensation for the business, that we will not be able to keep the compensation, or that we will not be able to divest the business without incurring significant charges. Any of these outcomes may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition, cash flows and liquidity.
We rely on technology systems to facilitate the management of our business and customer and supplier relationships, and a disruption of these systems could adversely affect our business.
Our technology systems, particularly our operational technology and IT systems, are an integral part of our business, and any disruption of these systems could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business efficiently, which, in turn, could cause our business and competitive position to suffer and adversely affect our results of operations. For example, we depend on these systems to bill customers, process orders, provide customer service, manage certain plant operations and construction projects, manage our financial records, track assets, remotely monitor certain of our plants and facilities and manage human resources, inventory and accounts receivable collections. These systems also enable us to purchase products from our suppliers and bill customers on a timely basis, maintain cost-effective operations and provide service to our customers.
Although we do not believe that these systems are at a materially greater risk of failure or cybersecurity incidents than other similar organizations, our operational technology and IT systems remain vulnerable to damage or interruption from:
power loss, computer systems failures, and internet, telecommunications or data network failures;
operator error or improper operation by, or the negligent or improper supervision of, employees and contractors;

physical and electronic loss of customer or employee data due to security breaches, cyber attacks, misappropriation and similar events;
computer viruses;
intentional security breaches, hacking, denial of services actions, misappropriation of data and similar events; and
severe weather and other events, including without limitation, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires, floods, earthquakes and other disasters.
These events may result in physical and electronic loss of customer, employee or financial data, security breaches, misappropriation and other adverse consequences. In addition, a lack of or inadequate levels of redundancy for certain of these systems, including billing systems, could exacerbate the impact of any of these events on us. We may not be successful in developing or acquiring technology that is competitive and responsive to the needs of our business, and we might lack sufficient resources to make the necessary upgrades or replacements of outdated existing technology to enable us to continue to operate at our current level of efficiency.
We may be subject to physical and/orand cyber attacks.
As operators of critical infrastructure, we may face a heightened risk of physical and/and cyber attacks from internal or cyber attacks.external sources. Our water and wastewater systems may be vulnerable to disability or failures as a result of physical or cyber attacks, acts of


32

war or terrorism, vandalism or other causes. Our operational technology and ITtechnology systems throughout our businesses may be vulnerable to unauthorized external or internal access, due to hacking, viruses, acts of violence, war or terrorism, and other causes. Unauthorized access to confidential information located or stored on these systems could negatively and materially impact our reputation, customers, employees, suppliers and other third parties. Further, third parties, including vendors, suppliers and contractors, who perform certain services for us or administer and maintain our sensitive information, could also be targets of cyber attacks and unauthorized access to their operational or technology systems. While we have instituted certain safeguards to protect our operational technology and ITtechnology systems, those safeguards may not always be effective due to the evolving nature of cyber attacks and cyber vulnerabilities. We cannot guarantee that such protections will be completely successful in the event of a cyber attack.
If, despite our security measures, a significant physical attack or cyber breach occurred, our operations could be disrupted, property damaged, and customer and other confidential information lost or stolen; we could experience substantial loss of revenues, response costs and other financial loss; we could suffer a loss of management time, attention and resources from our regular business operations; andwe may be subject to increased regulation,regulatory requirements; and we may experience litigation and damage to our reputation, any of which could have a negative impact on our business, results of operations and cash flows. Experiencing a physical or cyber security incident could also cause us to be non-compliant with applicable laws and regulations or contracts that require us to report cybersecurity incidents or breaches or securely maintain confidential data, causing us to incur costs related to legal claims or proceedings and regulatory fines or penalties. These types of events, either impacting our facilities or the industry in general, could also cause us to incur additional security and insurance related costs. Losses resulting from a physical or cyber attack against us or our operations or assets may not be covered by, or may exceed the coverage provided by, applicable insurance policies.
In addition, in the ordinary course of business, we collect and retain sensitive information, including personally identifiable information, about our customers and employees. In many cases, we outsource administration of certain functions to vendors that couldhave been and will continue to be targets of cyber attacks. Any theft, loss and/or fraudulent use of customer, employee or proprietary data as a result of a cyber attack on us or a vendor could also subject us to significant litigation, liability and costs, as well as adversely impact our reputation with customers and regulators, among others.
We have obtained insurance to provide coverage for a portion of the losses and damages that may result from a physical attack, cyber attack or a security breach, but such insurance is subject to a number of exclusions and may not cover the total loss or damage caused by an attack or a breach. Furthermore, the market for cybersecurity insurance is relatively new and coverage available for cybersecurity events will likely evolve as the industry matures. In the future, adequate insurance may not be available at rates that we believe are reasonable, and the costs of responding to and recovering from a physical attack, cyber attack or security breach incident may not be covered by insurance or recoverable in rates.
Our business is subject to complex and evolving federal, state and local laws and regulations regarding consumer privacy and the protection or transfer of data relating to individuals, which could result in, among other things, public disclosure of incidents, private or governmental claims or litigation against us, changes to our business practices, monetary penalties, reputational harm and increased cost of operations.

Laws and regulations are changing and increasing rapidly with respect to data and consumer privacy, security and protection. We are subject to an increasing number of complex and continually evolving data and consumer privacy, security and protection laws and regulations administered by various federal, state and local governments, including, for example, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018, together with its amendments and implementing regulations, the Virginia Consumer Data Protection Act and the Cyber Incident Reporting for Critical Infrastructure Act of 2022. New laws and regulations may require us to disclose incidents to authorities, regulators and/or the public, when we otherwise may not have been required to disclose such incidents under previous laws and regulations, and such disclosures could negatively and materially impact our reputation, customers, employees, suppliers and other third parties. Federal and state governments have also adopted or are proposing other limitations on, or requirements regarding, the collection, distribution, use, security and storage of personally identifiable information. In addition, the Federal Trade Commission and state attorneys general are applying federal and state consumer protection laws to impose standards on the collection, use and dissemination of data. Moreover, we expect that current laws, regulations and industry standards concerning privacy, data protection and information security in the United States will continue to evolve and increase, and we cannot determine the impact that compliance with such future laws, regulations or standards will have on us or on our business. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with current or future federal, state, or local data or consumer privacy or security laws, regulations, policies, guidance, industry standards, or legal obligations, or any incident resulting in unauthorized access to, or the acquisition, release, or transfer of, personally identifiable information or other data relating to our customers, employees and others, may result in private or governmental enforcement actions, litigation or other claims against us, fines and penalties, or adverse perception or publicity about us and our businesses, which could have a material adverse effect on our reputation and business and could result in us incurring substantial costs. These events could also require us to change our business practices, and the events or such changes may result in significant diversions of resources, distract management and divert the focus and attention of our security and technical personnel from other critical activities. Any of the foregoing consequences could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial


33

condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.
We may sustain losses that exceed or are excluded from our insurance coverage or for which we are self-insured.
We maintain insurance coverage, some of which may be self-insured, as part of our overall legal and risk management strategy to minimize potential liabilities arising from our Regulated Businesses, as well as the operations of MSG and CSG. Our insurance programs have varying coverage limits, exclusions and maximums, and insurance companies may seek to deny claims we might make. Generally, our insurance policies cover property damage, worker’s compensation, employer’s liability, general liability, cybersecurity, terrorism risks and automobile liability. Each policy includes deductibles or self-insured retentions and policy limits for covered claims. As a result, we may sustain losses that exceed or that are excluded from our insurance coverage, or for which we are self-insured and must therefore utilize our own financial resources to cover such losses. Although in the past we have been generally able to obtain insurance coverage related to our business, there can be no assurance that we can secure all necessary or appropriate insurance in the future, or that such insurance can be economically secured. For example, catastrophic events can result in decreased coverage limits, more limited coverage, increased premium costs or deductibles.
We rely on technology to facilitate the management of our business as well as our customer and supplier relationships, and a failure or disruption of implemented technology could materially and adversely affect our business.
Technology is an integral part of our business and operations, and any failure or disruption of the technology or related systems we implement could significantly limit our ability to manage and operate our business effectively and efficiently, which, in turn, could cause our business and competitive position to suffer and adversely affect our results of operations. We use technology systems to, among other things, bill customers, process orders, provide customer service, manage certain plant operations and construction projects, create and manage our financial records and other operational data, track assets, remotely monitor our plants and facilities, and manage human resources, supply chain, inventory, and accounts receivable collections. As a specific example, we depend on water meters to record and communicate the amount of water our customers use, which information in turn is used to generate customer bills, and in recent years, we have experienced greater than expected performance failures with certain water meters used in the Regulated Businesses. When failures occur, we work with meter manufacturers to determine and address the cause of such failures. While these and other failures that we have experienced have not to date had a material adverse effect on our operations, there can be no assurance that efforts to address performance failures or other issues we may experience with water meters or other implemented technology will be successful in the future and that these or future failures of water meters or other technological issues will not have a material adverse effect on us.
Although we do not believe that the technology we have implemented or may in the future implement is at a materially greater risk of failure than that used by other similar organizations, our technology and operations that use or rely on technology remain vulnerable to damage or interruption from, among other things: failure or interruption of the technology or its related systems; loss or failure of power, internet, telecommunications or data network systems; and operator error or improper operation by, the negligent or improper supervision of, or the intentional acts of, employees, contractors and other third parties. Any or all of these events could have a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
An inability to successfully develop and implement new technologies poses substantial risks to our business and operational excellence strategies, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
A significant part of our long-term strategic plan focuses on safety, operational excellence, cost and expense efficiency (including O&M expense efficiency), water quality and affordability, asset and capital management and the customer experience. For example, we have made and plan to continue to make significant investments in developing, deploying, integrating and maintaining customer-facing technologies, applications to support field service and customer service operations, water source sensor and evaluation technologies, meter data management and analytics, and intelligent automation technologies. There can be no assurance that we will be successful in designing, developing, deploying, integrating or maintaining these new technologies. Because these efforts can be long-term in nature, these new technologies may be more costly or time-consuming than expected to design, develop, integrate and complete and may not ultimately deliver the expected or desired benefits upon completion. While we have and will continue to seek to recover costs and earn a return on capital expenditures with respect to the costs and expenses of development and deployment of these new technologies in our Regulated Businesses, there can be no assurance that we will be able to do so in every instance or at all, and our inability to do so may adversely affect our ability to achieve intended cost and expense, including O&M expense, efficiencies or other key performance results and, ultimately, could materially and adversely impact our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Our inability to efficiently upgrade and improve our operational technology and ITtechnology systems, or implement new systems, could result in higher than expected costs or otherwise adversely impact our internal controls environment, operations and profitability.
Upgrades and improvements to computer systems and networks, or the implementation of new systems, may require substantial amounts of management’s time and financial resources to complete, and may also result in system or network defects or operational errors due to multiple factors, including employees’ ability to effectively use the new or upgraded system. We continue to implement technology to improve our business processes and customer interactions, and have installed new, and upgraded existing, technology


34

systems. These efforts support our broader strategic initiatives and are intended to improve our operations and enhance our customer service capabilities. Any technical or other difficulties in upgrading and improving existing or implementing new technology systems may increase costs beyond those anticipated and have an adverse or disruptive effect on our operations and reporting processes, including our internal control over financial reporting. We may also experience difficulties integrating current systems with new or upgraded systems, which may impact our ability to serve our customers effectively or efficiently. Although we make efforts to minimize any adverse impact on our controls, business and operations, we cannot assure that all such impacts have been or will be mitigated, and any such impacts could harm our business (individually or collectively) and have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
Disruptions in our supply chain related to goods, such as pipe, chemicals, power and other fuel, equipment, water and other raw materials, and services, could adversely impact our operations and our ability to serve our customers, as well as our financial results.
Our ability to serve our customers and operate our business in compliance with regulatory requirements is dependent upon purchasing or securing necessary goods and services from our suppliers and vendors. These items include but are not limited to contracted services, chemicals, pipe, valves, hydrants, fittings, equipment (including personal protective equipment), water, and power and other fuel. Examples of supply chain disruptions include reduced quantities of goods available in the marketplace, delays in manufacturing or shipping goods, labor shortages at our suppliers or vendors, natural or other disasters and operational impacts to some of our suppliers or vendors. Disruptions in our supply chain related to goods and services have occurred and we anticipate will continue to occur into the foreseeable future. For example, a recent fire at a plant owned by the sole supplier of permanganate in the Western Hemisphere has severely limited the U.S. supply of potassium and sodium permanganate, two chemicals used by water utilities to treat water. The Company is seeking to utilize alternative methods of treatment and to manage its existing supplies of permanganate, but any inability to source sufficient quantities of these chemicals or utilize alternative chemicals may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s ability to comply with applicable environmental and regulatory requirements.

Supply chain disruptions may cause us to be unable to purchase or otherwise obtain needed goods or services at a reasonable price or at all, and may significantly increase the price of goods and services we may obtain from suppliers and vendors. This, in turn, may adversely impact our operations and our ability to serve our customers in compliance with regulatory requirements, as well as our associated results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. While we attempt to plan for and have contingencies in place to address supply chain disruptions, our mitigation efforts may not be successful or may have further negative impacts on us.

Our business has inherently dangerous workplaces.work sites. If we fail to maintain safe work sites, we may experience workforce or customer injuries or loss of life, and be exposed to financial losses, including penalties and other liabilities.
Safety is a core value and a strategy at American Water. Our safety record isperformance and progress to our ultimate desired goal of zero injuries are critical to our ability to carry out our operations effectively and to serve our customers, and thereby, to support our reputation. We maintain health and safety standardspractices to protect our employees, customers, contractors, vendors and the public. Although we intendEliminating all hazards all of the time is extremely challenging, but through strict adherence to adhere to suchour health and safety standardspractices, and aim for zero injuries, it is extremely difficultempowering employees to avoid accidents at all times.be safety leaders who are instructed to and expected to stop work if deemed “unsafe,” we believe we can achieve an injury-free workplace.

OurAt our business sites, including construction and maintenance sites, often put our employees, contractors and others are often in close proximity withto large pieces ofmechanical operating equipment, moving vehicles, pressurized water, undergroundelectric and gas utility lines, below grade trenches and vaults, electrical and pneumatic hazards, fall from height hazards, suspended loads, hazardous chemicals and other regulated materials. On many sites, we are responsible for safety and, accordingly, must implement important safety procedures.procedures and practices above governmental regulatory requirements. As an essential business that provides water and wastewater services, we are focused on the health and safety of our employees, contractors, vendors, customers and others who work at or visit our worksites. If we fail to implement such procedures or if the procedures we implement are ineffective or are not followed by our employees or others, or we fail to implement procedures, our employees, contractors and others may be injuredexperience illness, or die.minor, serious or fatal injuries. Unsafe work sites also have the potential to increase employee turnover, expose us to litigation and raise our operating costs. Any of the foregoing could result in financial losses, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
In addition, our operations can involve the delivery, handling, storage, use and storagedisposal of hazardous chemicals, which, if improperly delivered, handled, stored, used or disposed of, could result in serious injury, death, environmental damage or property damage, and could subject us to penalties or other liabilities. We are also subject to regulations dealing withvarious environmental, transportation and occupational health and safety.safety regulations. Although we maintain functional employee groups whose primary purpose is to ensure we implement effective environmental health safety, and environmentalsafety work procedures and practices throughout our organization, including construction sites and maintenance sites,operating facilities, the failure to comply with suchthese regulations or procedures could subject us to liability.
Work stoppages and other labor relations matters could adversely affect our results of operations.operations and the ability to serve our customers.


35

As of December 31, 2017,2022, approximately 46%47% of our workforce was represented by unions, and we had 7675 collective bargaining agreements in place with 1914 different unions representing our unionized employees. These collective bargaining agreements, including 35 which expired in 2017, and 2018 of which will expire during 2018,2023, are subject to periodic renewal and renegotiation. Moreover, our national benefits agreement with most of the labor unions that represent employees in our Regulated Businesses expires on July 31, 2018 and will be renegotiated during 2018. We may not be able to successfully renew or renegotiate these labor contracts, or enter into new agreements, on terms that are fairacceptable to us. Any negotiations or dispute resolution processes undertaken in connection with our labor contracts could be delayed or affected by labor actions or work stoppages. Labor actions, work stoppages or the threat of work stoppages, and our failure to obtain favorable labor contract terms during renegotiations, may disrupt our operations, negatively impact the ability to serve our customers, and result in higher labor costs, which could adversely affect our reputation, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity. While we have developed contingency plans to be implemented as necessary if a work stoppage or strike does occur, a strike or work stoppage may have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain, and utilize qualified personnel.
The success of our business is dependent upon our ability to hire, retain, and utilize qualified personnel, including engineers, licensed operators, water quality and other operating and craft personnel, and management professionals who have the required experience and expertise. From time to time, it may be difficult to attract and retain qualified individuals with the expertise and in the timeframe demanded for our business needs. In certain geographic areas, for example, we may not be able to satisfy the demand for our services because of our inability to successfully hire and retain qualified personnel.
In addition, as some of our key personnel approach retirement age, we need to have appropriate succession plans in place and to successfully implement such plans. If we cannot attract and retain qualified personnel or effectively implement appropriate succession plans, it could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Financial, Economic and Market-Related Risks
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our business adversely and limit our ability to plan for or respond to changes in our business, and we may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our liquidity needs.
As of December 31, 2017,2022, our aggregate long-term and short-term debt balance (including preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements) was $7.7$12.4 billion, and our working capital (defined as current assets less current liabilities) was in a deficit position. Our indebtedness could have important consequences, including:
limiting our ability to obtain additional financing to fund future working capital requirements or capital expenditures;
exposing us to interest rate risk with respect to the portion of our indebtedness that bears interest at variable rates;
limiting our ability to pay dividends on our common stock or make payments in connection with our other obligations;
impairing our access to the capital markets for debt and equity;
requiring that an increasing portion of our cash flows from operations be dedicated to the payment of the principal and interest on our debt, thereby reducing funds available for future operations, dividends on our common stock or capital expenditures;
limiting our ability to take advantage of significant business opportunities, such as acquisition opportunities, and to react to changes in market or industry conditions; and
placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to those of our competitors that have less debt.

During 2022, we utilized existing sources of liquidity, such as our current cash balances, cash flows from operations and borrowings under our commercial paper program, to meet our short-term liquidity requirements. We believe that existing sources of liquidity will be sufficient to meet our cash requirements for the foreseeable future. In order to meet our capital expenditure and other operational needs, however, we may be required to makeborrow additional borrowingsfunds under ourthe revolving credit facility or issue new short-termfacility. In the event of a sustained market deterioration, we may need to obtain additional sources of liquidity, which would require us to evaluate available alternatives and long-term debt securities.take appropriate actions. Moreover, additional borrowings may be required to repay or refinance outstanding indebtedness. Debt maturities and sinking fund payments in 2018, 20192023, 2024 and 20202025 will be $322$281 million, $170$476 million and $51$598 million, respectively. We can provide no assurance that we will be able to access the debt or equity capital markets on favorable terms, if at all.all, to repay or refinance this debt. Moreover, ifas new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks we now face could intensify, limiting our ability to repay or refinance existing debt on favorable terms.
In an attempt to manage our exposure to interest rate risk associated with our issuance of variable and fixed-rate debt, weWe have in the past entered into, and in the future may enter into, financial derivative instruments, including without limitation, interest rate swaps, forward starting swaps swaptions and U.S. Treasury lock agreements. See Item 7A—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. However, these efforts may not be effective to fully mitigate interest rate risk, and may expose us to other risks and uncertainties, including quarterly “mark to market” valuation risk associated with these instruments, that could negatively and materially affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
We will depend primarily on cash flows from operations to fund our expenses and to pay the principal and interest on our outstanding debt. Therefore, ourOur ability to pay our expenses and satisfy our debt service obligations depends in significant part on our future performance, which will be affected by the financial, business, economic, competitive, legislative (including tax initiatives and reforms, and other similar legislation or regulation), regulatory and other risk factors largelydescribed in this section, many of which are beyond our control. If we do not have sufficient cash flows to pay the principal and interest on our outstanding debt, we may be required to refinance all or part of our existing debt, reduce capital investments, sell assets, borrow additional funds or sell additional equity. In addition, if our business does not generate sufficient cash flows from operations, or if we are unable to incur indebtedness sufficient to enable us to fund our liquidity needs, we may be unable to plan for or respond to changes in our business, which could cause our financial condition, operating results and prospects to be affected materially and adversely.


36

Our inability to access the debt or equity capital or financial markets or other events could affect our ability to meet our long-term commitments or liquidity needs at reasonable cost, and our ability to meet long-term commitments, which could adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations.
In addition to cash from operations, during 2022, we relyrelied primarily on oura revolving credit facility, which was increased from $2.25 billion to $2.75 billion in October 2022, a commercial paper programs,program, which was increased from $2.10 billion to $2.60 billion in October 2022, and the debt capital markets, to satisfy our liquidity needs. In this regard, our principal external sources of short-term liquidity are our $1.6 billion commercial paper program and our $1.75 billionThe revolving credit facility. Our revolving credit facility currently expires in accordance with its terms in June 2020. WeOctober 2027. Historically, we have regularly useused our commercial paper program under thisrather than the revolving credit facility as a principal source of short-term borrowing due to the generally more attractive rates we generally cancould obtain in the commercial paper market. As of December 31, 2017, American Water Capital Corp. (“AWCC”), our wholly owned financing subsidiary, had2022, there were no outstanding borrowings under the revolving credit facility, and had $905$1,177 million of commercial paper outstanding and $84$78 million in outstanding letters of credit. There can be no assurance that AWCCwe will be able to continue to access itsthis commercial paper program or its revolving credit facility, when, as and if desired, or that the amount of capital available thereunder will be sufficient to meet all of our liquidity needs at a reasonable, or any, cost.
UnderOur ability to comply with covenants in our revolving credit facility and our other consolidated indebtedness is subject to various risks and uncertainties, including events beyond our control. For example, under the terms of ourthe revolving credit facility, our consolidated debt cannot exceed 70% of our consolidated capitalization, as determined under the terms of the credit facility. If our equity were to decline or debt were to increase to a level that caused our debtcauses us to exceed this limit, lenders under the credit facility would be entitled to refuse any further extension of credit and to declare all of the outstanding debt under the credit facilitythereunder immediately due and payable. Events that could cause a reduction in equity include, without limitation, a significant write-down of our goodwill. To avoid such a default, a waiver or renegotiation of this covenant would be required, which would likely increase funding costs and could result in additional covenants that would restrict our operational and financing flexibility.
Our ability to comply with this and other covenants contained in the revolving credit facility and our other consolidated indebtedness is subject to various risks and uncertainties, including events beyond our control. For example, events that could cause a reduction in equity include, without limitation, a significant write-down of our goodwill. Even if we are able to comply with this or other covenants, the limitations on our operational and financial flexibility could harm our business by, among other things, limiting our ability to incur indebtedness or reduce equity in connection with financings or other corporate opportunities that we may believe would be in our best interests or the interests of our stockholdersshareholders to complete.

In order to meet our capital expenditure needs, we intend to issue a combination of short-term and long-term debt securities and/or additional equity shares of common stock. Disruptions in the debt or equity capital markets or changes in our credit ratings or other events could also limit our ability to access capital on terms favorable to us or at all. While the lending banks that participate in ourthe revolving credit facility have met all ofto date honored their obligations,commitments under those facilities, disruptions in the credit markets, changes in our credit ratings, or deterioration of the banking industry’s financial condition could discourage or prevent lenders from meeting their existing lending commitments, extending the terms of such commitments, or agreeing to new commitments. These or other occurrences may cause our lenders to not meet their existing commitments, andIn such a case, we may not be able to access the commercial paper, debt or loanequity capital markets, or debt marketsother sources of potential liquidity, in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all. Furthermore, our inability to maintain, renew or replace commitments under thisour revolving credit facility could materially increase our cost of capital and adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity. Longer termShort- or long-term disruptions or volatility in the debt or equity capital and credit markets as a result of uncertainty,economic, legislative, political or other uncertainties, including as a result of changes in U.S. tax and other laws, reduced financing alternatives, or failures of significant financial institutions could adversely affect our access to the capital necessary to provide adequate liquidity needed for our business. Any significant disruptionSignificant volatility or disruptions in the debt or equity capital debt or credit markets, or financial institution failures, could require us to take measures to conserve cash until the market stabilizes or until alternative financing can be arranged. Such measures could include delaying or deferring capital expenditures, reducing or suspending dividend payments, and reducing other discretionary expenditures.
Any of the foregoing events that impede our access to Finally, even absent significant volatility or disruptions in the capital markets, there can be no assurance that we will be able to access markets to obtain capital or the failurefinancing when necessary or desirable and on terms that are reasonable or acceptable to us.
The occurrence of any of our lenders to meet their commitments that result from financial market disruptions,these circumstances could expose us to increased interest or other expense, require us to institute cash or liquidity conservation measures or otherwise adversely and materially affect our business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.liquidity, which may limit or impair our ability to achieve our strategic, business and operational goals and objectives.
American WaterParent company may be unable to meet its ongoing and future financial obligations and to pay dividends on its common stock if its subsidiaries are unable to pay upstream dividends or repay funds to American Water.funds.
American WaterParent company is a holding company and, as such, American Waterit has no substantive operations of its own. Substantially all of our consolidated assets are held by subsidiaries. American Water’sParent company’s ability to meet its financial obligations and to pay dividends on its common stock is primarily dependent on the net income and cash flows of its subsidiaries and their ability to pay upstream dividends to American Water or repay indebtedness to American Water.parent company. Prior to paying dividends to American Water, American Water’sparent company, our regulated subsidiaries must comply with applicable regulatory restrictions and financial obligations, including, for example, debt service and preferred and preference stock dividends, as well as applicable corporate, tax and other laws and regulations and agreements, and our covenants and other agreements made or entered into by American Water and its subsidiaries. American Water’sagreements. Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities and have no obligation to pay or upstream dividends to American Water.parent company. A failure or inability of any of these subsidiaries to pay such dividends or repay intercompany obligations could have a material adverse impact on American Water’sour liquidity and itsparent company’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock and meet its other obligations.
We may not be able to fully utilize our U.S. and state net operating loss carryforwards.

As
37

Table of December 31, 2017, we had U.S. federal and state NOL carryforwards of approximately $1.05 billion and $322 million, respectively, and management believes it is more likely than not that these NOL carryforwards will be recovered in the future. With the enactment of the TCJA, the Company analyzed the impacts of the reduction in the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% on the Company’s deferred tax assets and liabilities, including its NOL carryforwards, and as a result, remeasured those NOL carryforwards as of the date of enactment of the TCJA based on this tax rate change.Contents
Our federal NOL carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028, and our state NOL carryforwards will begin to expire in 2018 through 2037. Our ability to utilize our NOL carryforwards is primarily dependent upon our ability to generate sufficient taxable income. We have, in the past, been unable to utilize certain of our state NOL carryforwards, and the establishment or increase of a valuation allowance in the future would reduce our deferred income tax assets and our net income.
Our actual results may differ from those estimated by management in making its assessment as to our ability to use the NOL carryforwards. Moreover, adoption of Related Interpretations with respect to the TCJA and other changes in income tax laws, the economy and the general business environment could affect the future utilization of our NOL carryforwards. If we are unable to fully utilize our NOL carryforwards to offset taxable income generated in the future, our financial position, results of operations and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.
We have recorded a significant amount of goodwill and intangible and other assets, and we may never realize the full value of our intangible assets, causing usbe required to record impairments thator changes in fair value to these assets, which may negatively affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Our total assets include $1.4as of December 31, 2022 included $1.1 billion of goodwill and $347 million of total assets measured and recorded at December 31, 2017.fair value on a recurring basis. The goodwill is primarily associated with the acquisition of American Water by an affiliate of our previous owner in 2003 and the acquisition of E’town Corporation by a predecessor to our previous owner in 2001, and, to a lesser extent, the acquisition of Keystone in 2015.2003. Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price the purchaser paid over the fair value of the net tangible and other intangible assets acquired. Goodwill is recorded at fair value on the date of an acquisition and is reviewed annually or more frequently if changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable. As required by the applicable accounting rules, in the past, we have taken significant non-cash charges to operating results for impairments to goodwill impairmentsor other intangible assets, and have recorded changes in the past.

fair value of financial instruments and other assets. We may be required to recognize in the future an impairment of goodwill or a change in the futurefair value of financial instruments or certain other assets due to market conditions, or other factors related to our performance or the performance of an acquired business.business, or other circumstances that may impact the fair value of a financial instrument or the other asset. See Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Information in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for information on the fair value of financial and other assets. These market conditions could include a decline over a period of time of our stock price, a decline over a period of time in valuation multiples of comparable water utilities, market price performance of our common stock that compares unfavorably to our peer companies, decreases in control premiums, or with respect to Keystone, fluctuations in the level of exploration and production activities in the Marcellus and Utica shale regions served by Keystone, a prolonged depression of natural gas prices or other factors that negatively impact our current or future forecasts of operating results, cash flows or key assumptions.circumstances. A decline in the results forecasted in our business plan due to events such as changes in rate case results, capital investment budgets or interest rates, could also result in an impairment charge. Recognition of impairments of goodwill and changes in fair value of certain of our other assets would result in a charge to income in the period in which the impairment or change occurred, which may negatively affect our financial condition, results of operations and total capitalization. The effects of any such impairment or change could be material and could make it more difficult to maintain our credit ratings, secure financing on attractive terms, maintain compliance with debt covenants and meet the expectations of our regulators.
Market volatility and other conditions may impact the value of benefit plan assets and liabilities, as well as assumptions related to the benefit plans, which may require us to provide significant additional funding.
The performance of the capital markets affects the values of the assets that are held in trust to satisfy significant future obligations under our pension and postretirement benefit plans. The value of these assets is subject to market fluctuations and volatility, which may cause investment returns to fall below our projected return rates. A decline in the market value of theour pension and postretirement benefit plan assets as of the measurement date or a change in the projection of the future return on plan assets can increase the funding requirements under our pension and postretirement benefit plans. Additionally, our pension and postretirement benefit plan liabilities are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Interest rates have experienced volatility and are subject to potential further adjustments based on the actions of the U.S. Federal Reserve, and others. If interest rates decrease,are lower at the current measurement date than the prior measurement date, our liabilities would increase, potentially increasing benefit expense and funding requirements. Further, changes in demographics,assumptions, such as increases in life expectancy assumptions and increasing trends in health care costs may also increase our funding requirements. Future increases in pension and other postretirement costs as a result of reduced plan assets may not be fully recoverable in rates, in which case our results of operations and financial position could be negatively affected.
In addition, market factors can affect assumptions we use in determining funding requirements with respect to our pension and postretirement plans. For example, a relatively modest change in our assumptions regarding discount rates can materially affect our calculation of funding requirements. To the extent that market data compels us to reduce the discount rate used in our assumptions is reduced, our benefit obligations could be materially increased, which could adversely affect our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
Additional Risks Related to Other Businesses
Parent company provides performance guarantees with respect to certain of the obligations of our Other businesses, including financial guarantees or deposits, which may adversely affect parent company if the guarantees are successfully enforced.
Under the terms of certain agreements under which our Other businesses, primarily MSG,provide water and wastewater services to municipalities and federal governmental entities, parent company provides guarantees of specified performance obligations, including financial guarantees or deposits. In the event these obligations are not performed, the entity holding the guarantees may seek to enforce the performance commitments against parent company or proceed against the deposit. In that event, our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity could be adversely affected. At December 31, 2022, we had remaining performance commitments, as measured by remaining contract revenue, totaling approximately $6.9 billion related to MSG’s contracts, and this amount is likely to increase if the number of military bases served by MSG increases. The presence of these commitments may adversely affect our financial condition and make it more difficult for us to secure financing on attractive terms.
MSG’s operations are subject to various risks associated with doing business with the U.S. government.
MSG enters into contracts with the U.S. government for the operation and maintenance of water and wastewater systems, which contracts may be terminated, in whole or in part, prior to the end of the 50-year term for convenience of the U.S. government or as a result of default or non-performance by the subsidiary performing the contract. In addition, the contract price for each of these military contracts is typically subject to either an annual economic price adjustment, or a price redetermination two years after commencement


38

of operations and every three years thereafter. Annual economic price adjustment is an inflation index-based contract price increase mechanism. Price redetermination is a contract mechanism to periodically adjust the service fee in the next period to reflect changes in contract obligations and market conditions. Any early contract termination or unfavorable annual economic price adjustment or price redetermination could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Moreover, entering into contracts with the U.S. government subjects us to a number of operational and compliance risks, including dependence on the level of government spending and compliance with and changes in governmental procurement and security regulations. We are subject to potential government investigations of our business practices and compliance with government procurement and security regulations, which are complex, and compliance with these regulations can be expensive and burdensome. If we were charged with wrongdoing as a result of an investigation, we could be suspended or debarred from bidding on or receiving awards of new contracts with the U.S. government or our existing contracts could be terminated, which could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations and cash flows.
General Risk Factors
New accounting standards or changes to existing accounting standards could materially impact how we report our results of operations, cash flowflows and financial condition.
Our Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with GAAP. The SEC, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or other authoritative bodies or governmental entities may issue new pronouncements or new interpretations of existing accounting standards that may require us to change our accounting policies.policies or critical accounting estimates. These changes are beyond our control, can be difficult to predict and could materially impact how we report our results of operations, cash flowflows and financial condition. We could be required to apply a new or revised standard retroactively, which could also adversely affect our previously reported results of operations, cash flowflows and financial condition.
Undetected errors in internal controls and information reporting could result in the disallowance of cost recovery and noncompliant disclosure.
Our internal controls, accounting policies and practices and internal information systems are designed to enable us to capture and process transactions and information in a timely and accurate manner in compliance with GAAP, taxation requirements, federal securities laws and regulations and other laws and regulations applicable to us. Such compliance permits us to, among other things, disclose and report financial and other information in connection with the recovery of our costs and with the reporting requirements under federal securities, tax and other laws and regulations.
We have also implemented corporate governance, internal control and accounting policies and procedures in connection with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”) and relevant SEC rules, as well as other applicable regulations. Such internal controls and policies have been and continue to be closely monitored by our management and Board of Directors to ensure continued compliance with these laws, rules and regulations. Management is also responsible for establishing and maintaining internal control over financial reporting and is required to assess annually the effectiveness of these controls. While we believe these controls, policies, practices and systems are adequate to verify data integrity, unanticipated andor unauthorized actions of employees or temporary lapses in internal controls due to shortfalls in oversight or resource constraints could lead to undetected errors that could result in the disallowance of cost recovery and noncompliantnon-compliant disclosure and reporting. The consequences of these events could have a negative impact on our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. The inability of management to certify as to the effectiveness of these controls due to the identification of one or more material weaknesses in these controls could also harm our reputation, increase financing costs or could also adversely affect our or AWCC’s ability to access the capital markets.

Our continued success is dependent upon our ability to attract, hire and retain highly qualified, skilled and/or diverse talent.
Additional Risks Related to Our Market-Based Businesses
We (excluding our regulated subsidiaries) provide performance guarantees with respect to certain obligationsThe success of our Market-Based Businesses,business is dependent upon our ability to attract, hire and retain highly qualified, skilled and/or diverse talent, including financial guarantees or deposits,engineers, licensed operators, water quality and management professionals who have the desired experience and expertise. Similar to other organizations, the Company may have challenges implementing its human capital management and employee succession plans to attract and retain such talent based on a number of factors including, among others, market conditions, retirements and geography. If we are unable to meet these human capital resource challenges, our public-sector and public clients, and these clients may seek to enforce the guarantees if our Market-Based Businesses do not satisfy these obligations.
Under the terms of some of our agreements for the provision of services to water and wastewater facilities with municipalities, other governmental entities and other customers, American Water (excluding our regulated subsidiaries) provides guarantees of specified performance obligations of our Market-Based Businesses, including financial guarantees or deposits. In the event our Market-Based Businesses fail to perform these obligations, the entity holding the guarantees may seek to enforce the performance commitments against us or proceed against the deposit. In that event, ourbusiness, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows may be materially and liquidity couldadversely impacted.
Our business may be adversely affected.affected by the intentional misconduct of our employees and contractors.
At December 31, 2017, we had remaining performance commitments as measured by remaining contract revenue totaling approximately $3.6 billion,Our Code of Ethics requires employees and this amount is likelycontractors to increase ifmake decisions ethically and in compliance with applicable law and regulatory requirements, and our Market-Based Businesses expand. The presenceCode of these commitments may adversely affect our financial conditionEthics and make it more difficult for usits underlying policies, practices and procedures. All employees are required to secure financingcomplete training on attractive terms.
AWE’s operations are subject to various risks associated with doing business withand review the U.S. government.
We enter into contracts with the U.S. government for the operationCode of Ethics on an annual basis, and maintenance of water and wastewater systems, which contracts may be terminated, in whole or in part, prior to the endviolations of the 50-year termCode of Ethics could result in disciplinary actions up to, and including, termination. Despite these efforts to prevent misconduct, it is possible for convenienceemployees or contractors to engage in intentional misconduct and violate laws and regulations through, among other things, theft, fraud, misappropriation, bribery, corruption and engaging in conflicts of the U.S. governmentinterest or asrelated person transactions, or otherwise committing serious breaches of our Code of Ethics and our policies, practices and procedures. Intentional misconduct by employees or contractors could result in substantial liability, higher costs, increased regulatory scrutiny and significant reputational harm, any of which could have a result of default or non-performance by the subsidiary performing the contract. In addition, the contract price for each of these military contracts is typically subject to redetermination two years after commencement of operations and every three years thereafter. Price redetermination is a contract mechanism to periodically adjust the service fee in the next period to reflect changes in contract obligations and anticipated market conditions. Any early contract termination or unfavorable price redetermination could adversely affectmaterial adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
Moreover, entering into contracts with the U.S. government subjects us to a number


39

AWE operates a number of water and wastewater systems under O&M contracts and faces the risk that the owners of those systems may fail to provide capital to properly maintain those systems, which may negatively affect AWE as the operator of the systems.
AWE operates a number of water and wastewater systems under O&M contracts. Pursuant to these contracts, AWE operates the system according to the standards set forth in the applicable contract, and it is generally the responsibility of the owner of the system to undertake capital improvements. In some cases, AWE may not be able to convince the owner to make needed improvements in order to maintain compliance with applicable regulations. Although violations and fines incurred by water and wastewater systems may be the responsibility of the owner of the system under these contracts, those non-compliance events may reflect poorly on AWE as the operator of the system and us, and damage our reputation, and in some cases, may result in liability to us to the same extent as if we were the owner.
AWE’s Market-Based Businesses are party to long-term contracts to operate and maintain water and wastewater systems under which we may incur costs in excess of payments received.
Some of AWE’s Market-Based Businesses enter into long-term contracts under which they agree to operate and maintain a municipality’s, federal government’s or other party’s water or wastewater treatment and delivery facilities, which includes specified major maintenance for some of those facilities, in exchange for an annual fee. These Market-Based Businesses are generally subject to the risk that costs associated with operating and maintaining the facilities, including production costs such as purchased water, electricity, fuel and chemicals used in water treatment, may exceed the fees received from the municipality or other contracting party. Losses under these contracts or guarantees may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and liquidity.

Keystone’s operations may expose us to substantial costs and liabilities with respect to environmental laws and matters.
Keystone’s operations, and the operation generally of natural gas and oil exploration and production facilities by Keystone’s customers, are subject to stringent federal, state and local laws, rules, regulations and ordinances governing the release of materials into the environment or otherwise relating to environmental protection. These provisions may require the acquisition by Keystone of permits or licenses before providing its services to customers, prohibit the release of substances defined thereunder as hazardous in connection with these activities, and impose substantial liabilities for the violation thereof that may result from these operations. Failure to comply with these laws, rules, regulations and ordinances may result in substantial environmental remediation and other costs to Keystone, the assessment of administrative, civil and criminal penalties or the issuance of injunctions restricting or prohibiting certain activities. Under existing environmental laws and regulations, Keystone could be held strictly liable for the removal or remediation of previously released materials or property contamination regardless of whether the release resulted from its operations, or whether its operations were in compliance with all applicable laws at the time they were performed. While we have structured and maintained our ownership and control of Keystone’s operations in such a way that we believe should insulate the Company, its regulated subsidiaries and its other Market-Based Businesses from any liabilities associated with Keystone’s operations, including liabilities for environmental matters, there can be no assurance that such efforts will be sufficient to prevent the Company from incurring liability for the operations of Keystone.
Changes in environmental laws and regulations occur frequently, and any changes to these or other laws governing the natural gas and oil exploration industry that result in more stringent or costly water or wastewater handling, storage, transport, disposal or cleanup requirements could require Keystone to make significant expenditures to maintain compliance with such requirements, may harm Keystone’s business and results of operations by reducing the demand for Keystone’s water and related services, and may otherwise have a material adverse effect on Keystone’s competitive position, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 1B.
ITEM 1B.    UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
None
None.
ITEM 2.PROPERTIES
OurITEM 2.    PROPERTIES
The Company’s properties consist primarily of:of (i) water and wastewater treatment plants;plants, (ii) mains and pipes used for transmission, distribution and collection of water and wastewater;wastewater, (iii) wells and other sources of water supply, such as reservoirs;reservoirs, (iv) water and wastewater pumping stations;stations, (v) meters and fire hydrants;hydrants, (vi) general structures, including buildings, dams and treated water storage facilities;facilities, (vii) land and easements;easements, (viii) vehicles;vehicles, (ix) software rights, and;and (x) other equipment and facilities, the majority of which are used directly in the operation of ourits systems. Substantially all of ourthe Company’s properties are owned by ourits subsidiaries, with a large percentage subject to liens of ourits mortgage bonds. We lease ourA wholly owned subsidiary of parent company owns the Company’s corporate offices,headquarters, located in Voorhees,Camden, New Jersey, and the Company and its operating subsidiaries lease office space, equipment and furniture from certain of ourthe Company’s wholly owned subsidiaries. These properties are utilized by ourthe Company’s directors, officers and staff in the conduct of the business.
The properties of ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses consist mainly of:of approximately:
7280 surface water treatment plants;
527490 groundwater treatment plants;
8 combined (surface water and groundwater) treatment plants;
127175 wastewater treatment plants;
50,38253,500 miles of transmission, distribution and collection mains and pipes;
1,1031,100 groundwater wells;
1,4281,700 water and wastewater pumping stations;
1,3131,100 treated water storage facilities; and
8073 dams.
We haveThe Company has ongoing infrastructure renewal programs in all states in which ourits Regulated Businesses operate. These programs consist of both the rehabilitation of existing mains and equipment, and the replacement of mains and equipment that have been damaged or have reached, or are near, the end of their useful service lives. The properties of our Market-Based Businesseswithin Other consist mainly of office furniture and IT equipment, and are primarily located in New Jersey.equipment. Approximately 52%51% of all properties that we ownthe Company owns are located in New Jersey and Pennsylvania.
We maintainThe Company maintains property insurance against loss or damage to ourits properties by fire or other perils, subject to certain exceptions. For insured losses, we arethe Company is self-insured to the extent that any losses are within the policy deductible or exceed the amount of insurance maintained.

We believeThe Company believes that ourits properties are generally maintained in good operating condition and in accordance with current standards of good water and wastewater industry practice.
ITEM 3.LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
ITEM 3.    LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
Set forth below is information related to the Company’s material pending legal proceedings as of February 15, 2023, other than ordinary routine litigation incidental to the business, required to be disclosed in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The information below should be read together with Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. In accordance with the SEC’s disclosure rules, the Company has elected to disclose environmental proceedings involving the Company and a governmental authority if the amount of potential monetary sanctions, exclusive of interest and costs, that the Company reasonably believes will result from such proceeding is $1 million or more.
Alternative Water Supply in Lieu of Carmel River Diversions
Compliance with SWRCB Orders to Reduce Carmel River Diversions
Under the 2009 Order, Cal Am is required, among other things, to decrease significantly its yearly diversions of water from the Carmel River according to a set reduction schedule. See Item 1—Business—Regulated Businesses—Water Supply and Wastewater Services and Item 1A—Risk Factors. The 2009 Order responded to claims that Cal Am had not sufficiently implemented actions to terminate its unpermitted diversions of water from the Carmel River as required by athe 1995 SWRCB order.Order issued by the SWRCB. In July 2016, at the request of Cal Am and several Monterey County government agencies, the SWRCB issued the 2016 Order approving a five-year extensiondeadline of the deadline to complyDecember 31, 2021 for Cal Am’s compliance with the 2009 Order.


40

The 2009 Order to December 31, 2021. In November 2016, the Water Ratepayers Association of the Monterey Peninsula,includes a citizens’ advocacy group, filed an action in Sacramento County Superior Court against the SWRCB and its board members, and namingcondition prohibiting Cal Am asfrom diverting water from the real partyCarmel River for new service connections or for any increased use of water at existing service addresses resulting from a change in interest, seeking to reverse the extension of the 2009 Order, to rescind the designation byzoning or use. In 2011, the California Public Utilities Commission (the “CPUC”) of Cal Am as the public utility water provider to the Monterey Peninsula, and to appointissued a receiver to overseedecision directing modifications in Cal Am’s compliance withtariffs to recognize the moratorium mandated by the 2009 Order, and directing Cal Am to seek written guidance from the SWRCB with ultimate transferrespect to any unresolved issues of interpretation or implementation of this condition. In 2012, the Deputy Director of the SWRCB sent a public entity.letter to Cal Am providing an interpretation as to the calculation of a baseline to determine increases in use of water at existing service addresses. In March 2018, the MPWMD adopted a resolution directing Cal Am to interpret the baseline in a manner that conflicts with the SWRCB’s written interpretation. In May 2017,2018, Cal Am notified the MPWMD and the SWRCB filed demurrersthat it intends to seek declaratory relief concerning the action, and on June 12, 2017, the court entered an order sustaining those demurrers and dismissing the action with prejudice.
Regional Desalination Project Litigation
The Regional Desalination Project (the “RDP”) involved the construction of a desalination facility in the City of Marina, north of Monterey. The RDP was intended to, among other things, eliminate unauthorized diversions from the Carmel River as requiredconflicting regulatory interpretations under the 2009 Order. In December 2010, the CPUC approved the RDP, which was to be implemented through a Water Purchase Agreement and ancillary agreements (collectively, the “Agreements”) among the Marina Coast Water District (“MCWD”), the Monterey County Water Resources Agency (“MCWRA”) and Cal Am. In 2011, due to a conflict of interest concerning a former member of MCWRA’s Board of Directors, MCWRA stated that the Agreements were void, and, as a result, Cal Am terminated the Agreements. In April 2015, the CPUC approved a settlement agreement among Cal Am, MCWRA and the County of Montereyan attempt to resolve these matters amongconflicting interpretations prior to seeking judicial intervention, Cal Am has met with the parties signingMPWMD and the agreement. In March 2016,SWRCB several times. The SWRCB agreed to circulate revisions to its 2012 interpretive letter, which would be subject to a public comment period. Any failure to follow the Supreme Court of California granted MCWD’s petition for review ofMPWMD’s resolution or the CPUC approval,SWRCB’s written interpretation, despite these conflicting interpretations, could potentially result in fines, penalties and followingother actions against Cal Am.
Following issuance by the court’s dispositionCoastal Commission in November 2022 of a related issuecoastal development permit, as described below, Cal Am continues to work constructively with all appropriate agencies to obtain the remaining required permits for the Water Supply Project. However, there can be no assurance that the Water Supply Project in another case, MCWD’s petition for reviewits current configuration will be completed on a timely basis, if ever. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Cal Am has complied with the diversion limitations contained in the 2016 Order. Continued compliance with the diversion limitations in 2023 and future years may be impacted by a number of factors, including without limitation continued drought conditions in California and the CPUC-approved settlement agreement was remandedexhaustion of water supply reserves, and will require successful development of alternate water supply sources sufficient to meet customer demand. The 2009 Order and the 2016 Order remain in effect until Cal Am certifies to the CPUC,SWRCB, and remains pending.
In October 2012,the SWRCB concurs, that Cal Am filedhas obtained a Complaintpermanent supply of water to substitute for Declaratory Relief against MCWRA and MCWD, which was ultimately transferred topast unauthorized Carmel River diversions. While the San Francisco County Superior Court, seeking a determination as to whetherCompany cannot currently predict the Agreements are void as alikelihood or result of any adverse outcome associated with these matters, further attempts to comply with the alleged conflict of interest. In June 2015,2009 Order and the court entered a final judgment agreeing with Cal Am’s position that four of the five Agreements are void, and one, the credit line agreement, is not void. In November 2016 the Supreme Court of California denied MCWD’s final appeal of this judgment, which allows further proceedings to determine the amount of damages that may be awardedOrder in the proceeding.
In July 2015,future may result in material additional costs and obligations to Cal Am, including fines and MCWRA filed a Complaint in San Francisco County Superior Court against MCWD and RMC Water and Environment (“RMC”), a private engineering consulting firm, seeking to recover compensatory damages in excess of $10 million associated with the failure of the RDP, as well as punitive and treble damages, statutory penalties and attorneys’ fees. Shortly thereafter, complaints seeking similar damages were filed in the same court by MCWD and RMC against Cal Am and MCWRA in excess of $19 million in the aggregate. In December 2015,event of noncompliance with the court consolidated all of these complaints into a single action,2009 Order and trial in this matter has been scheduled for June 18, 2018. On December 21, 2017, RMC filed a Motion for Summary Judgment and a hearing on such motion is scheduled for March 15, 2018. On December 6, 2017, MCWD filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings and a hearing on such motion took place on February 2, 2018. On February 5, 2018, the court dismissed Cal Am’s and MCWRA’s tort law claims against MCWD, and allowed Cal Am leave to amend its breach of contract claims against MCWD. The court’s decision does not impact Cal Am’s and MCWRA’s tort claims against RMC. Cal Am and MCWRA were given until February 19, 2018 to amend their breach of contract claims. Cal Am and MCWRA are considering their responses to the order, including an appeal to the California Court of Appeal.2016 Order.
Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project
TheCPUC Final Approval of Water Supply Project is intended to reduce water diversions from the Carmel River and involves construction of a desalination plant, owned by Cal Am, and purchase of water by Cal Am from a groundwater replenishment project (the “GWR Project”) between the Monterey Regional Water Pollution Control Agency and the MPWMD.
Cal Am’s ability to move forward on the Water Supply Project is and has been subject to extensive administrative review by the CPUC and other government agencies, obtaining necessary permits, and intervention from other parties. On January 12, 2017, the CPUC issued a Draft Environmental Impact Report/Environmental Impact Statement. A final report is expected at the end of the first quarter of 2018.

On September 15,In 2016, the CPUC unanimously approved a final decision to authorize Cal Am to enter into a water purchase agreement for the GWR Project and to construct a pipeline and pump station facilities and recover up to the incurred $50 million in associated costs plus AFUDC, subject to meeting certain criteria. If
In 2018, the CPUC unanimously approved another final decision finding that the Water Supply Project meets the CPUC’s requirements for a CPCN and an additional procedural phase was not necessary to consider alternative projects. The CPUC’s 2018 decision concludes that the Water Supply Project is the best project to address estimated future water demands in Monterey, and, in addition to the cost recovery approved in its 2016 decision, adopts Cal Am’s cost estimates for the Water Supply Project, which amounted to an aggregate of $279 million plus AFUDC at a rate representative of Cal Am’s actual financing costs. The 2018 final decision specifies the procedures for recovery of all of Cal Am’s prudently incurred costs associated with the Water Supply Project upon its completion, subject to the frameworks included in the final decision related to cost caps, O&M costs, financing, ratemaking and contingency matters. The reasonableness of the Water Supply Project costs will be reviewed by the CPUC when Cal Am seeks cost recovery for the Water Supply Project. Cal Am is also required to implement mitigation measures to avoid, minimize or offset significant environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the Water Supply Project and comply with a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, a reimbursement agreement for CPUC costs associated with that program, and reporting requirements on plant operations following placement of the Water Supply Project in service. Cal Am has incurred $206 million in aggregate costs as of December 31, 2022, related to the Water Supply Project, which includes $51 million in AFUDC.
In September 2021, Cal Am, Monterey One Water and the MPWMD reached an agreement on Cal Am’s purchase of additional water from an expansion to the GWR Project, which is not expected to produce additional water until 2024 at the earliest. The amended and restated water purchase agreement for the GWR Project expansion is subject to review and approval of the CPUC, and in November 2021, Cal Am filed an application with the CPUC that sought review and approval of the amended and restated water purchase agreement. Cal Am also requested rate base treatment of the additional capital investment for certain Cal Am facilities required to maximize the water supply from the expansion to the GWR Project and a related Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project, totaling approximately $81 million. This requested amount was in addition to, and consistent in regulatory treatment with, the prior $50 million of cost recovery for facilities associated with the original water purchase agreement, which was approved by the CPUC in its unanimous 2016 final decision.


41

On December 5, 2022, the CPUC issued a final decision that authorizes Cal Am to enter into the amended water purchase agreement, and specifically to increase pumping capacity and reliability of groundwater extraction from the Seaside Groundwater Basin. The final decision sets the cost cap for the proposed facilities at approximately $62 million. Cal Am may seek recovery of amounts above the cost cap in a subsequent rate filing or general rate case. Additionally, the final decision authorizes AFUDC at Cal Am’s actual weighted average cost of debt for most of the facilities.
On December 30, 2022, Cal Am filed with the CPUC an application for rehearing of the CPUC’s December 5, 2022 final decision. Cal Am is requesting inclusion in the cost cap all infrastructure costs for the GWR Project expansion that were not included in the final decision. Cal Am believes that the December 5, 2022 final decision is contrary to the CPUC’s precedent and that obtaining recovery of these infrastructure costs is a key component of the GWR Project expansion and Cal Am’s ability to meet the future water supply needs of its customers in Monterey. This application remains pending.
While Cal Am believes that its expenditures to date have been prudent and necessary to comply with the 2009 Order and the 2016 Order, as well as the CPUC’s 2016 and 2018 final decisions, Cal Am cannot currently predict its ability to recover all of its costs and expenses associated with the Water Supply Project and there can be no assurance that Cal Am will be able to recover all of such costs and expenses in excess of the $112 million in aggregate construction costs, exceed $50 million,plus applicable AFUDC, previously approved by the CPUC in its 2016 and December 2022 final decisions. See Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for further discussion.
Coastal Development Permit Application
In 2018, Cal Am submitted a coastal development permit application (the “Marina Application”) to the City of Marina (the “City”) for those project components of the Water Supply Project located within the City’s coastal zone. Members of the City’s Planning Commission, as well as City councilpersons, have publicly expressed opposition to the Water Supply Project. In May 2019, the City issued a notice of final local action based upon the denial by the Planning Commission of the Marina Application. Thereafter, Cal Am appealed this decision to the Coastal Commission, as permitted under the City’s code and the California Coastal Act. At the same time, Cal Am submitted an application (the “Original Jurisdiction Application”) to the Coastal Commission for a coastal development permit for those project components located within the Coastal Commission’s original jurisdiction. After Coastal Commission staff issued reports recommending denial of the Original Jurisdiction Application, noting potential impacts on environmentally sensitive habitat areas and wetlands and possible disproportionate impacts to communities of concern, in September 2020, Cal Am withdrew the Original Jurisdiction Application in order to address the staff’s environmental justice concerns.The withdrawal of the Original Jurisdiction Application did not impact Cal Am’s appeal of the City’s denial of the Marina Application, which remains pending before the Coastal Commission.In November 2020, Cal Am refiled the Original Jurisdiction Application.
On October 5, 2022, Cal Am announced a phasing plan for the proposed desalination plant component of the Water Supply Project. The desalination plant and slant wells originally approved by the CPUC would produce up to 6.4 million gallons of desalinated water per day. Under the phased approach, the facilities would initially be constructed to produce up to 4.8 million gallons per day of desalinated water, enough to meet anticipated demand through about 2030, and would limit the number of slant wells initially constructed. As demand increases in the future, desalination facilities would be allowedexpanded to meet the additional demand. The phased approach seeks to meet near-term demand by allowing for additional supply as it becomes needed, while also providing an opportunity for regional future public participation and was developed by Cal Am based on feedback received from the community.
On November 18, 2022, the Coastal Commission approved the Marina Application and the Original Jurisdiction Application with respect to the phased development of the proposed desalination plant, subject to compliance with a number of conditions, all of which Cal Am expects to satisfy. Cal Am continues to seek additional cost recovery.the remaining permits necessary to construct the Water Supply Project.
On December 29, 2022, the City, Marina Coast Water District (“MCWD”), MCWD’s groundwater sustainability agency (“GSA”), and the MPWMD jointly filed a petition for writ of mandate in Monterey County Superior Court against the Coastal Commission, alleging that the Coastal Commission violated the California Coastal Act and the California Environmental Quality Act in issuing a coastal development permit to Cal Am for construction of the MPWSP slant wells. Cal Am is named as a real party in interest. This matter remains pending.
Subject to the impact or resolution of this litigation, construction of the desalination plant is expected to begin in 2024 and the desalination plant is estimated to be in-service by the end of 2027.
Desalination Plant Development Permit
The proposed desalination plant for the Water Supply Project is to be located in an unincorporated portion of Monterey County, California, on a site owned by CEMEX, Inc. (“CEMEX”), and requires a combined development permit from Monterey County prior to commencement of construction. In April 2019, Monterey County’s Planning Commission voted to approve the permit. In July 2019, the Board of Supervisors heard appeals filed by MCWD and a public advocacy group, at which time it denied the appeals and


42

approved the permit. In August 2019, MCWD filed a petition in Monterey County Superior Court challenging Monterey County’s approval of Cal Am’s combined development permit application and seeking injunctive relief to enjoin Monterey County and Cal Am from commencing construction of the desalination plant. In October 2019, after a hearing, the court denied, without prejudice, MCWD’s motion for a preliminary injunction, but issued a stay of Monterey County’s approval of the combined development permit, precluding commencement of physical construction of the desalination plant, but allowing Cal Am to continue to obtain permits needed for the desalination plant’s construction. In January 2021, the court issued its decision granting in part and denying in part MCWD’s petition. The court found that Monterey County did not completely comply with all of the requirements necessary to approve the combined development permit and set aside its approval so that Monterey County could come into compliance. The court denied all of MCWD’s other claims. The court also lifted its stay on physical construction at the plant site.
In May 2021, Cal Am filed a notice of appeal as to the Monterey County Superior Court’s January 2021 decision, seeking to challenge the court’s decision on Monterey County’s statement of overriding considerations. Monterey County filed a notice of appeal as to the same issue in May 2021. In June 2021, MCWD filed cross-appeals on its claims that had been denied by the court. These appeals remain pending.
Proposed Zoning Changes at CEMEX Site for Slant Wells
In August 2018, the City circulated a public review draft of proposed amendments to its local coastal program and zoning ordinance, and placed the matter for consideration on the Planning Commission’s agenda for its September 2018 meeting. The proposed amendments would change zoning at the CEMEX site to open space and restrict future uses, including with respect to Cal Am’s planned use of the site for the slant wells for the Water Supply Project. Any change to the City’s local coastal program must ultimately be approved by the Coastal Commission. Cal Am, CEMEX and the Coastal Commission each submitted letters opposing the proposed amendments. At its November 2018 meeting, the Planning Commission adopted a resolution recommending that the Marina City Council consider approving the amendments.
In December 2018, the Marina City Council considered the proposed amendments. Cal Am, CEMEX and the Coastal Commission again submitted letters opposing the proposed changes, but the City Council unanimously adopted a resolution amending its local coastal plan and a draft amendment to its zoning ordinance. Changes to the ordinance require a second reading before becoming final, which occurred at the City’s December 2018 meeting. The changes to the local coastal plan must be submitted to the Coastal Commission for approval and are not effective until such approval is obtained.
Test Slant Well Permitting
A preliminary step to building the Water Supply Project desalination plant is the construction and operation of a test slant well to confirm the suitability of the property on which intake wells will be located to draw water from under Monterey Bay. In November 2014, the California Coastal Commission (the “Coastal Commission”) approved coastal development permits for the test slant well, enabling Cal Am to construct and operate the test slant well. The permits would have expired onEffective February 28, 2018, at which time Cal Am would have been required to decommission the test slant well but becausepumping ceased, except for minimal maintenance pumping activities, in accordance with Cal Am’s coastal development permits. Because Cal Am couldmay use the test slant well as one of the slant wells for the Water Supply Project, itCal Am sought an amendment of its coastal development permitsand obtained from the Coastal Commission permit amendments to allow the test slant well to remain in place and be maintained on site until February 28, 2019. The Coastal Commission approved the permit amendment on December 13, 2017. The2024. A required lease obtained from the California State Lands Commission, (the “State Lands Commission”), as amended, after a two-year extension granted on November 29, 2017, is to expireexpired on December 16, 2019.2022. Cal Am has filed an applications for extension of the State Lands Commission lease. This application remains pending.
OnWater Supply Project Land Acquisition and Slant Well Site Use
In July 13, 2017, the Coastal Commission adopted a consent agreement and cease and desist order requiring sand mining operations on the property owned by CEMEX on which intake wells for the Water Supply Project will be located, to cease by the end of 2020 and the property to be sold to either a non-profit or governmental entity. The consent agreement strictly limits future use of the property but preserves Cal Am’s existing property rights and allows uses consistent with existing easements and other rights of record.
The CPUC held hearings from October 25 through November 3, 2017 on Cal Am’s request for a certificate of public convenience and necessity for the Water Supply Project. This request remains pending.
In December 2014, the MCWD and the Ag Land Trust, an agricultural land conservancy, filed petitions against the Coastal Commission and A permanent easement granted by CEMEX to Cal Am which were ultimately transferredwas recorded in June 2018 to allow Cal Am access to the Santa Cruz County Superior Court, seeking to vacate the Coastal Commission’s approval of the coastal development permitproperty and to permanently restrain Cal Amconstruct, operate and the Coastal Commission from constructing the test slant well pending full compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and the California Coastal Act. The court denied these petitions, and on January 11, 2017, the Supreme Court of California denied MCWD’s petition for review of this decision. MCWD filed a similar petition in January 2015 against the State Lands Commission and Cal Am, which remains pending.
In November 2015, MCWD filed a Petition for Writ of Mandate and Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief in Santa Cruz County Superior Court against the Coastal Commission and Cal Am challenging the amendment of the coastal development permits and seeking an injunction against further test well pumping. In September 2016, the court denied MCWD’s petition with respect to all claims, except claims related to those raised in the December 2014 petitions discussed above. On October 3, 2017, after conducting a trial for all matters raised in MCWD’s November 2015 challenge, other than claims that had been denied by the court in September 2016, the court denied MCWD’s claims with respect to these matters. On January 12, 2018, MCWD filed a notice of appeal of the court’s judgment.
Based on the foregoing, Cal Am estimates that the earliest date by whichmaintain the Water Supply Project desalination plant could be completed is sometimeintake wells. in 2021. There can be no assuranceNovember 2019, the City notified CEMEX that, based on this permanent easement and Cal Am’s proposed use of the site for the intake wells, CEMEX has breached or will soon breach a prior 1996 annexation agreement (to which Cal Am was not a party). The City states that it intends to seek declaratory relief from CEMEX and Cal Am ordering that Cal Am’s applicationextraction is limited to 500 acre-feet per year of groundwater, that Cal Am cannot export extracted water out of the basin, and that the permanent easement granted by CEMEX to Cal Am is void. CEMEX has denied the City’s claims and requested indemnification from Cal Am under the terms of the permanent easement. Cal Am and CEMEX believe that there is no valid limitation under the annexation agreement on Cal Am’s right to pump brackish groundwater and seawater at the site for desalination and use by Cal Am’s customers.
In May 2020, the City filed a lawsuit in Monterey County Superior Court, naming Cal Am and CEMEX as defendants, and MCWRA and MCWD as real parties in interest. The lawsuit, as amended, alleges a claim for breach of contract against CEMEX and seeks declaratory relief to void the permanent easement and prohibiting extraction of water by Cal Am’s slant wells at the CEMEX


43

site in excess of 500 acre-feet per year and the export of such water outside the groundwater basin. In November 2020, Cal Am, CEMEX and MCWRA filed demurrers, which were overruled by the court at a hearing held in February 2021.
In August 2020, MCWD filed a cross-complaint in the May 2020 lawsuit against Cal Am, CEMEX and MCWRA, alleging claims for specific performance of certain provisions of the 1996 annexation agreement related to the property owned by CEMEX on which intake wells for the Water Supply Project will be approved or that the Water Supply Project will be completedlocated, as well as claims of water rights, nuisance and unreasonable water use, and seeking additional declaratory relief. Following various rulings on a timely basis, if ever. Furthermore, there can be no assurance thatdemurrers filed by Cal Am, willCEMEX and MCWRA, in February 2021, the court sustained, without leave to amend, the demurrer to MCWD’s nuisance claim and overruled the remainder of the demurrers. In October 2021, the court granted a motion filed by Cal Am related to MCWD’s cross-complaint, which motion requested a referral of certain issues related to MCWD’s water rights and unreasonable use claims to the SWRCB for its expert advisory opinion. The SWRCB has scheduled hearings on the referred issues before its Administrative Hearing Officer, which took place in the fourth quarter of 2022 and are set to continue into early 2023. The Monterey County Superior Court has set a trial date of October 23, 2023, for the City’s lawsuit.
Challenges Related to Compliance with California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act
Under California’s Sustainable Groundwater Management Act (“SGMA”) enacted in 2015, groundwater basins designated by the state as critically overdrafted must be ablemanaged by a GSA by 2020 in accordance with an approved groundwater sustainability plan (“GSP”) designed to complyachieve sustainability by 2040. Under the SGMA, GSAs have broad powers to achieve sustainability including, but not limited to, regulating groundwater extraction by imposing fees on groundwater extractions and controlling groundwater extractions by regulating, limiting or suspending extractions from wells. The 400-acre CEMEX site overlies a small portion of the 180/400 Subbasin of the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin; the 84,000-acre 180/400 Subbasin has been designated by the state as critically overdrafted, mainly due to seawater intrusion into the subbasin.
In late 2016, the Salinas Valley Basin Groundwater Sustainability Agency (the “SVBGSA”) was formed as a joint powers authority to become the GSA for the Salinas Valley Groundwater Basin and prepare a GSP. In April 2018, the City filed a notice to become the GSA for the CEMEX site, creating an overlap with the diversion reduction requirements and other remaining requirements underSVBGSA’s filing for the 2009 Order and180/400 Subbasin. In 2016, the 2016 Order,SVBGSA commenced preparation of a GSP covering the entire 180/400 subbasin, including the CEMEX site, but in August 2019 the City filed a notice that it intends to prepare its own GSP for the CEMEX site with the intent to severely limit or prohibit groundwater pumping at that any such compliancesite. The State Department of Water Resources (“SDWR”) has taken the position that until the overlap is resolved, it will not resultaccept the GSP from either agency, placing the subbasin at risk of being placed in material additional costs or obligationsa probationary status and subject to Cal Am orstate management. In December 2019, the Company.
California Public Utilities Commission Residential Rate Design ProceedingCounty of Monterey filed its own notice to become the exclusive GSA at the CEMEX site in order to resolve the overlap, which is permitted under SGMA. SDWR accepted Monterey County’s filing in December 2019, and now lists Monterey County as the exclusive GSA for the site.
In December 2016,2019, the CPUC issuedCity filed a final decisionlawsuit in Monterey County Superior Court challenging Monterey County’s filing, and SDWR’s acceptance of the filing, as the exclusive GSA for the CEMEX site. The City has named Monterey County and its Board of Supervisors, its GSA, and SDWR and its director as defendants, and the SVBGSA and its Board of Directors as real parties. The City seeks to invalidate Monterey County’s filing, as well as injunctive relief to preserve the City’s status as a proceeding involvingGSA for the site. To protect its interest in the matter, Cal Am filed an application to intervene in this lawsuit, which was granted. Monterey County filed cross-claims against the City and SDWR. After a hearing, in August 2021, the court denied the claims brought by the City and granted Monterey County’s cross-claims, finding that the City’s GSA notice was untimely, the Monterey County GSA was the exclusive GSA for the CEMEX site, and the SVBGSA’s GSP was properly adopted for the entire 180/400 subbasin, including the CEMEX site. In November 2021, the City appealed this decision, and in December 2021, Monterey County appealed the court’s decision as to the finding that the City’s action creating a GSA was not void.
In September 2020, Cal Am filed a separate but related complaint in Monterey County Superior Court challenging the validity of actions taken by the City and its GSA in adopting a new residential rate designgroundwater sustainability plan for the CEMEX site, and the validity of the provisions of such plan. Due to the overlap of issues in the City’s lawsuit with those in the validation action, the parties stipulated to a stay of the validation action pending determination of the claims in the City’s action, which was approved by the court in December 2020.
In February 2021, the City filed a separate but related in rem reverse validation complaint challenging the adoption by Monterey County of a GSP for the CEMEX site. This complaint remains pending. Currently, both validation actions remain stayed during the pendency of the City’s appeals.
Proposed Acquisition of Monterey System Assets — Local Area Formation Commission Litigation
In November 2018, voters in Monterey, California passed “Measure J,” which decided that the MPWMD should conduct a feasibility study concerning the potential purchase of Cal Am’s Monterey District. The decision allowedsystem assets, and, if feasible, to proceed with a purchase of


44

those assets without an additional public vote. This service territory represents approximately 40,000 customers. See Item 1—Business—Regulated Businesses—Condemnation and Eminent Domain for recoverymore information on this matter.
In February 2021, the MPWMD filed an application with LAFCO seeking approval to become a retail water provider and annex approximately 58 parcels of land into the MPWMD’s boundaries. In December 2021, LAFCO’s commissioners denied the MPWMD’s application to become a retail water provider, determining that the MPWMD does not have the authority to operate the Monterey system assets, a result that precludes the MPWMD from proceeding with a condemnation thereof. On April 1, 2022, the MPWMD filed a lawsuit against LAFCO challenging its denial. On June 17, 2022, the court granted, with conditions, a motion by Cal Am of $32 million in under-collectionsto intervene in the water revenue adjustment mechanism/modified cost balancing account (“WRAM/MCBA”) over a five-year period, plus interest,MPWMD’s lawsuit against LAFCO. On December 13, 2022, the court sustained in part, and modified existing conservation and rationing plans. In its decision,denied in part, demurrers that had been filed by LAFCO seeking to dismiss the CPUC noted concern regarding Cal Am’s residential tariff administration, specifically regarding the lack of verification of customer-provided information about the number of residents per household.MPWMD’s lawsuit. This information was used for generating billing determinants under the tiered rate system. As a result, the CPUC kept this proceeding open to address several issues, including whether Cal Am’s residential tariff administration violated a statute, rule or CPUC decision, and if so, whether a penalty should be imposed.
On February 24, 2017, Cal Am, the MPWMD, the CPUC’s Office of Ratepayer Advocates, and the Coalition of Peninsula Businesses filed for CPUC approval of a joint settlement agreement (the “Joint Settlement Agreement”), which among other things, proposed to resolve the CPUC’s residential tariff administration concerns by providing for a waiver by Cal Am of $0.5 million of cost recovery for residential customers through the WRAM/MCBA in lieu of a penalty. Approval of the Joint Settlement Agreement, which is required for it to take effect,matter remains pending before the CPUC.

On March 28, 2017, the administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding issued a ruling stating there was sufficient evidence to conclude, on a preliminary basis, that Cal Am’s administration of the residential tariff violated certain provisions of the California Public Utilities Code and a CPUC decision. The ruling ordered Cal Am to show cause why it should not be penalized for these administrative violations and directed the settling parties to address whether the cost recovery waiver in the Joint Settlement Agreement was reasonable compared to a potential penalty range described by the administrative law judge. During hearings held on April 13-14, 2017, the administrative law judge clarified that this potential penalty range is $3 million to $179 million (calculated as a continuing violation dating back to 2000 and applying penalties of up to $20,000 per day until January 1, 2012 and penalties of up to $50,000 per day thereafter, reflecting a 2012 change to the relevant statute). The administrative law judge also noted that a per diem penalty may not be appropriate, as Cal Am’s monthly billing practices did not allow Cal Am to update customer-provided information for billing purposes on a daily basis. Hearings before the administrative law judge in this matter were held in August, September and November 2017. Cal Am also submitted additional testimony on the issue of whether Cal Am should be penalized, and if so, the reasonable amount of any such penalty. This proceeding remains pending, and the CPUC has set a statutory deadline of September 30, 2018 for the completion of the proceeding.pending.
West Virginia Elk River Freedom Industries Chemical Spill
Background
On January 9, 2014, a chemical storage tank owned bySee Note 16—Commitments and Contingencies—Contingencies—West Virginia Elk River Freedom Industries Inc. leaked two substances, 4-methylcyclohexane methanol (“MCHM”), and PPH/DiPPH, a mix of polyglycol ethers, into the Elk River near the WVAWC treatment plant intake in Charleston, West Virginia. After having been alerted to the leak of MCHM by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, WVAWC took immediate steps to gather more information about MCHM, augment its treatment process as a precaution, and begin consultations with federal, state and local public health officials. As soon as possible after it was determined that the augmented treatment process would not fully remove the MCHM, a joint decision was reached in consultation with the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health to issue a “Do Not Use” order for all of its approximately 93,000 customer accounts in parts of nine West Virginia counties served by the Charleston treatment plant. By January 18, 2014, none of WVAWC’s customers were subject to the Do Not Use order.
Following the Freedom Industries chemical spill, numerous lawsuits were filed against WVAWC and certain other Company-affiliated entities (collectively, the “American Water Defendants”) with respect to this matterChemical Spill in the U.S. District CourtNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements for information regarding the Southern District of West Virginia or West Virginia Circuit Courts in Kanawha, Boone and Putnam counties, and to date, more than 70 cases remain pending. Four of the cases pending before the U.S. districtfinal court were consolidated for purposes of discovery, and an amended consolidated class action complaint for those cases (the “Federal action”) was filed in December 2014 by several plaintiffs. In January 2016, all of the then-filed state court cases were referred to West Virginia’s Mass Litigation Panel for further proceedings, which have been stayed until April 22, 2018 pending the approval by the court in the Federal action of a global agreement to settle all of such cases, as described below. The court in the Federal action has continued the start of the trial indefinitely pending ongoing settlement approval activities.
Proposed Global Class Action Settlement
In October 2016, the court in the Federal action approved the preliminary principles, terms and conditions of a binding global agreement in principle to settle claims among the American Water Defendants, and all class members, putative class members, claimants and potential claimants, arising out of the Freedom Industries chemical spill. On April 27, 2017, the parties filed with the court in the Federal action a proposed settlement agreement providing details of the terms of the settlement of these matters and requesting that the court in the Federal action grant preliminary approval of such settlement. On July 6, 2017, the court in the Federal action issued an opinion denying without prejudice the joint motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement. On August 25, 2017, the parties filed a proposed amendedglobal settlement agreement and related materials addressing the matters set forth in the July 6, 2017 order.
On September 21, 2017, the court in the Federal action issued an order granting preliminary approval of a settlement class and proposed class action settlement (the “Settlement”) with respect to claims against the American Water Defendants by all putative class members (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) for all claims and potential claims arising out of the Freedom Industries chemical spill. The Settlement proposes a global resolution of all federal and state litigation and potential claims against the American Water Defendants and their insurers. Under the terms and conditions of the Settlement and the proposed amended settlement agreement, the American Water Defendants have not admitted, and will not admit, any fault or liability for any of the allegations made by the Plaintiffs in any of the actions to be resolved. Under federal class action rules, claimants had the right, until December 8, 2017, to elect to opt out of the final Settlement, in which case such claimant would not receive any benefit from or be bound by the terms of the Settlement. As of January 31, 2018, less than 100 of the 225,000 estimated putative Plaintiffs have submitted opt-out notices. The deadline to file a claim in the Settlement is February 21, 2018.

The proposed aggregate pre-tax amount of the Settlement with respect to the Company is $126 million. The aggregate portion of the Settlement to be contributed by WVAWC, net of insurance recoveries, is $43 million (approximately $26 million after-tax), taking into account the September 2017 settlement with one of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers discussed below. Another defendant to the Settlement is to contribute up to $25 million to the Settlement. Two of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers, which provide an aggregate of $50 million in insurance coverage to the Company under these policies, had been originally requested to participate in the Settlement at the time of the initial filing of the binding agreement in principle with the court in the Federal action, but did not agree to do so at that time. WVAWC filed a lawsuit against one of these carriers alleging that the carrier’s failure to agree to participate in the Settlement constituted a breach of contract. On September 19, 2017, the Company and the insurance carrier settled this lawsuit for $22 million, out of a maximum of $25 million in potential coverage under the terms of the relevant policy, in exchange for a full release by the Company and WVAWC of all claims against the insurance carrier related to theJanuary 2014 Freedom Industries, Inc. chemical spill. WVAWC and the settling insurer have agreed to stay this litigation pending final approval of the Settlement. The Company and WVAWC continue to pursue vigorously their rights to insurance coverage for contributions by WVAWC to the Settlement in mandatory arbitration with the remaining non-participating carrier. This arbitration proceeding remains pending. Despite these efforts, the Company may not ultimately be successful in obtaining full or further reimbursement under this insurance policy for amounts that WVAWC may be required to contribute to the Settlement.
The proposed Settlement would establish a two-tier settlement fund for the payment of claims, comprised of (i) a simple claim fund, which is also referred to as the “guaranteed fund,” of $76 million, of which $29 million will be contributed by WVAWC, including insurance deductibles, and $47 million would be contributed by two of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers, and (ii) an individual review claim fund of up to $50 million, of which up to $14 million would be contributed by WVAWC and up to $36 million would be contributed by a number of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers. Separately, up to $25 million would be contributed to the guaranteed fund by another defendant to the Settlement. If any final approval order by the court in the Federal action with respect to the Settlement is appealed and such appeal would delay potential payment to claimants under the Settlement, WVAWC and the other defendant to the Settlement will contribute up to $50 million and $25 million, respectively, to the Settlement (not including, in the case of WVAWC, any contributions by the Company’s general liability insurance carriers which would not be made until such time as a final, non-appealable order is issued) into an escrow account during the pendency of such appeals. For certain claims, WVAWC and the other defendant to the Settlement may, in lieu of these escrowed contributions, make advance payments of such claims if agreed to by the parties. All administrative expenses of the Settlement and attorneys’ fees of class counsel related thereto would be paid from the funds designated to pay claims covered by the Settlement.
As a result of these events, in the third quarter of 2016, the Company recorded a charge to earnings, net of insurance receivables, of $65 million ($39 million after-tax). Additionally, in the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a benefit of $22 million ($13 million after-tax) as an additional insurance receivable reflecting the settlement with the insurance carrier described above. The Company intends to fund WVAWC’s contributions to the Settlement through existing sources of liquidity, although no contribution by WVAWC will be required unless and until the terms of the Settlement are finally approved by the court in the Federal action. Furthermore, under the terms of the Settlement, WVAWC has agreed that it will not seek rate recovery from the PSC for approximately $4 million in direct response costs expensed in 2014 by WVAWC relating to the Freedom Industries chemical spill as well as for amounts paid by WVAWC under the Settlement.
The Company’s insurance policies operate under a layered structure where coverage is generally provided in the upper layers after claims have exhausted lower layers of coverage. The $36 million to be contributed by a number of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers to the individual review claim fund, as noted above, is from higher layers of the insurance structure than the insurance carrier that was requested, but presently has not agreed, to participate in the Settlement. Any recovery by WVAWC or the Company from the remaining non-participating carrier would reimburse WVAWC for its contributions to the guaranteed fund.
Notice of the terms of the Settlement to members of the settlement class commenced on October 11, 2017. Following the notice period, on January 9, 2018, the court in the Federal action held a fairness hearing to consider final approval of the Settlement, which was continued on February 1, 2018 to address certain open matters. At this hearing, the court in the Federal action indicated that it intended to enter an order approving the Settlement, and the parties submitted a proposed order to the court on February 2, 2018.
There can be no assurance that the Settlement will not be amended further or that the court will provide its final approval as to any agreement negotiated between the parties reflecting the terms of the Settlement.
The American Water Defendants believe that WVAWC has responded appropriately to, and, other than through the Settlement, has no responsibility for, the Freedom Industries chemical spill, and that the American Water Defendants have valid, meritorious defenses to the lawsuits. Nevertheless, WVAWC and the Company are unable to predict the outcome of any lawsuit against the American Water Defendants brought or maintained by a claimant that has elected to opt out of the Settlement, and any such outcome or outcomes could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, cash flows, liquidity and reputation.

Other Related Proceedings
Additionally, investigations were initiated with respect to the matter by the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (the “CSB”), the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia, the West Virginia Attorney General, and the PSC. As a result of the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation, Freedom Industries and six former Freedom Industries employees (three of whom also were former owners of Freedom Industries), pled guilty to violations of the federal Clean Water Act. The PSC issued an order on June 15, 2017 concluding its investigation without requiring WVAWC to take any further action with respect to the matters covered by the general investigation.
The CSB is an independent investigatory agency with no regulatory mandate or ability to issue fines or citations; rather, the CSB can only issue recommendations for further action. In response to the Freedom Industries chemical spill, the CSB commenced an investigation shortly thereafter. In September 2016, the CSB issued and adopted its investigation report in which it recommended that the Company conduct additional source water protection activities. On April 4, 2017, the CSB indicated that the implementation by the Company of source water protection activities resolved the first two parts of the CSB’s recommendation. The CSB also noted that compliance by the Company with the third part of its recommendation is ongoing and that closure of this part is contingent upon completion of updated contingency planning for the Company’s water utilities outside of West Virginia. In light of public response to its original September 2016 investigation report, on May 11, 2017, the CSB issued a new version of this report. The primary substantive change addressed CSB’s factual evaluation of the duration and volume of contamination from the leaking tank, decreasing its estimate of the leak time but increasing the volume estimate by 10%. No substantive changes were made to the conclusions and recommendations in the original report.
On March 16, 2017, the Lincoln County (West Virginia) Commission (the “LCC”) passed a county ordinance entitled the “Lincoln County, WV Comprehensive Public Nuisance Investigation and Abatement Ordinance.” The ordinance establishes a mechanism that Lincoln County believes will allow it to pursue criminal or civil proceedings for the “public nuisance” it alleges was caused by the Freedom Industries chemical spill. On April 20, 2017, the LCC filed a complaint in Lincoln County state court against WVAWC and certain other defendants not affiliated with the Company, alleging that the Freedom Industries chemical spill caused a public nuisance in Lincoln County. The complaint seeks an injunction against WVAWC that would require the creation of various databases and public repositories of documents related to the Freedom Industries chemical spill, as well as further study and risk assessments regarding the alleged exposure of Lincoln County residents to the released chemicals. On June 12, 2017, the Mass Litigation Panel entered an order granting a motion to transfer this case to its jurisdiction and stayed the case consistent with the existing stay order. The LCC has elected to opt out of the Settlement. On January 26, 2018, the LCC filed a motion seeking to lift the stay imposed by the Mass Litigation Panel. This motion is pending. WVAWC believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously contest the claims and allegations raised in the complaint.
WVAWC and the Company are unable to predict the outcome of the ongoing government investigations or actions or any legislative initiatives that might affect WVAWC’s water utility operations.
Dunbar, West Virginia Water Main Break Class Action Litigation
On the evening of June 23, 2015, a 36-inch pre-stressed concrete transmission water main, installed in the early 1970s, failed. The water main is part of WVAWC’sthe West Relay pumping station located in the City of Dunbar.Dunbar, West Virginia and owned by West Virginia-American Water Company, the Company’s West Virginia subsidiary (“WVAWC”). The failure of the main caused water outages and low pressure tofor up to approximately 25,000 WVAWC customers. In the early morning hours of June 25, 2015, crews completed a repair, but that same day, the repair developed a leak. On June 26, 2015, a second repair was completed and service was restored that day to approximately 80% of the impacted customers, and to the remaining approximately 20% by the next morning. The second repair showed signs of leaking but the water main was usable until June 29, 2015, to allow tanks to refill. The system was reconfigured to maintain service to all but approximately 3,000 customers while a final repair was being completed safely on June 30, 2015. Water service was fully restored on July 1, 2015, to all customers affected by this event.
On June 2, 2017, a class action complaint captioned Jeffries, et al. v. West Virginia-American Water Company was filed in West Virginia Circuit Court in Kanawha County against WVAWC on behalf of a purportedan alleged class of residents and business owners who lost water service or pressure as a result of the Dunbar main break. The complaint alleges breach of contract by WVAWC for failure to supply water, violation of West Virginia law regarding the sufficiency of WVAWC’s facilities and negligence by WVAWC in the design, maintenance and operation of the water system. The Jeffriesplaintiffs seek unspecified alleged damages on behalf of the class for lost profits, annoyance and inconvenience, and loss of use, as well as punitive damages for willful, reckless and wanton behavior in not addressing the risk of pipe failure and a large outage.
In February 2020, the Jeffries plaintiffs filed a motion seeking class certification on the issues of breach of contract and negligence, and to determine the applicability of punitive damages and a multiplier for those damages if imposed. In July 2020, the Circuit Court entered an order granting the Jeffries plaintiffs’ motion for certification of a class regarding certain liability issues but denying certification of a class to determine a punitive damages multiplier. In August 2020, WVAWC filed a Petition for Writ of Prohibition in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia seeking to vacate or remand the Circuit Court’s order certifying the issues class. In January 2021, the Supreme Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the Circuit Court for further consideration in light of a decision issued in another case relating to the class certification issues raised on appeal. On July 5, 2022, the Circuit Court entered an order again certifying a class to address at trial certain liability issues but not to consider damages. On August 26, 2022, WVAWC filed another Petition for Writ of Prohibition in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia challenging the West Virginia Circuit Court’s July 5, 2022 order. The Writ Petition has been supported by an amicus brief filed by certain water and utility industry trade groups. On February 9, 2023, the Supreme Court of Appeals accepted the Writ Petition by issuing a Rule to Show Cause and scheduling oral argument for April 26, 2023.
The Company and WVAWC believe that WVAWC has valid, meritorious defenses to the claims raised in this class action complaint. complaint and WVAWC will continue to vigorously defend itself against these allegations.
Chattanooga, Tennessee Class Action Litigation
On OctoberSeptember 12, 2017, WVAWC filed2019, Tennessee-American Water Company, the Company’s Tennessee subsidiary (“TAWC”), experienced a leak in a 36-inch water transmission main, which caused service fluctuations or interruptions to TAWC customers and the issuance of a boil water notice. TAWC repaired the main by early morning on September 14, 2019, and restored full water service by the afternoon of September 15, 2019, with the boil water notice lifted for all customers on September 16, 2019.


45

On September 17, 2019, a complaint captioned Bruce, et al. v. American Water Works Company, Inc., et al. was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee against TAWC, the Company and Service Company (collectively, the “Tennessee-American Water Defendants”), on behalf of a proposed class of individuals or entities who lost water service or suffered monetary losses as a result of the Chattanooga incident (the “Tennessee Plaintiffs”). The complaint alleged breach of contract and negligence against the Tennessee-American Water Defendants, as well as an equitable remedy of piercing the corporate veil. In the complaint as originally filed, the Tennessee Plaintiffs were seeking an award of unspecified alleged damages for wage losses, business and economic losses, out-of-pocket expenses, loss of use and enjoyment of property and annoyance and inconvenience, as well as punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and pre- and post-judgment interest. In September 2020, the court a motion seeking to dismissdismissed all of the plaintiffs’ counts alleging statutoryTennessee Plaintiffs’ claims in their complaint, except for the breach of contract claims against TAWC, which remain pending. In October 2020, TAWC answered the complaint, and common law tort claims. Furthermore, WVAWC asserts that the PSC, and notparties have been engaging in discovery. On January 12, 2023, after hearing oral argument, the court has primary jurisdiction over allegations involving violationsissued an oral ruling denying the Tennessee Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On February 9, 2023, the Tennessee Plaintiffs sought reconsideration of the applicable tariff,ruling by the public utility codecourt, and related rules. This motion remains pending.any final ruling is appealable to the Tennessee Court of Appeals, as allowed under Tennessee law.

TAWC and the Company believe that TAWC has meritorious defenses to the claims raised in this class action complaint, and TAWC is vigorously defending itself against these allegations.
Contract Operations Group -- East Palo AltoOther Matters
In April 2021, American Water System Voluntary Report
On April 10, 2017, AWE,Resources, LLC (“AWR”), which, prior to the parent entityDecember 9, 2021 sale of the Company’s Contract Operations Group, voluntarily reported to the Division of Drinking Waterformer HOS business was one of the SWRCB potential violations of the California Safe Drinking Water Act (the “CSDWA”)indirect, wholly owned subsidiaries comprising that business, received a grand jury subpoena in connection with AWE’s operationan investigation by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Eastern District of New York (the “EDNY”). The subpoena seeks documents regarding AWR’s operations and its contractor network in the New York City metropolitan area. On September 9, 2022, a former employee of AWR pled guilty in U.S. District Court to two felony counts in connection with the matters being investigated by the EDNY. The Company has been fully cooperating with the EDNY investigation and continues to do so, and continues to believe that the investigation is not focused on the Company.
In connection with the sale of the City of East Palo Alto’s water distribution system. Upon the resignation of the system’s general manager in March 2017, AWE discovered that it may have operated the system without a properly certified operator for two years, the triennial LCR sampling was not completed, and the 2015 Consumer Confidence Report improperly reported data for lead and copper samples from the system’s upstream water provider. Promptly after discovering these issues, AWE engaged an outside law firm to conduct an internal investigation and has reported the results of that investigation to the SWRCB.
On June 15, 2017, the SWRCB issued to AWE a citation that required AWE to, among other things: comply with regulations related to water operator certifications, lead and copper tap sampling requirements and the publishing of a Consumer Confidence Report; provide public notification of the LCR violation; and prepare a corrective action plan to evaluate the causes leading to these incidents and measures to be taken to prevent recurrence of future incidents. The citation did not impose on AWE any monetary penalties, but the SWRCB reserved the right to take additional enforcement action.
By letter dated October 4, 2017, the SWRCB advised AWE that it is in compliance withHOS operations (including all of the directivesCompany’s equity interests in AWR), in December 2021, the Company and relevant statutoryAWR entered into an agreement with the buyer of the HOS operations, which facilitates a common defense for, and administrative provisions specifiedthe sharing of information concerning, the EDNY investigation and any legal or regulatory inquiries or proceedings related to or resulting from it or the subject matter in the SWRCB’s June 15, 2017 citation. While AWE has completed allsubpoena (collectively, the “Covered Matters”). The Company, on behalf of AWR, is required compliance activitiesto defend any Covered Matter, using commercially reasonable efforts to resolve it on a reasonably expedient basis. Further, the Company is required to consult with respectthe buyer in specified circumstances and obtain its prior written consent (which consent may not be unreasonably withheld, conditioned or delayed) before entering into any resolution of any Covered Matter that imposes non-monetary provisions or undertakings or any other terms for which there will be no indemnification under this agreement. In addition, until March 9, 2025, the Company is required to indemnify the buyer for any monetary losses or out-of-pocket damages (as described in the agreement) incurred by the buyer or certain of the HOS subsidiaries to the citation,extent directly arising in connection with, or directly resulting from, any Covered Matter.
While it is not possible at this time to predict the SWRCB has previously reserved the right to take additional enforcement action. In February 2018, the SWRCB referred this matter to the San Mateo County, California District Attorney’s office for further investigation. AWE continues to cooperate with the SWRCB, the City of East Palo Alto and the San Mateo County District Attorney regarding this matter. Proven violationsoutcome of the CSDWAinvestigation or determine the amount, if any, of fines, penalties or other liabilities that may resultbe incurred in civil and criminal penalties.connection with it, the Company does not currently believe that the investigation will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations, financial condition or liquidity.
General
Periodically, the Company is involved in other proceedings or litigation arising in the ordinary course of business. Other than those proceedings described in this Item 3—Legal Proceedings, the Company does not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will materially affect its financial position or results of operations. However, litigation and other proceedings are subject to many uncertainties, and the outcome of individual matters is not predictable with assurance. It is possible that some litigation and other proceedings could be decided unfavorably to the Company, and that any such unfavorable decisions could have a material adverse effect on its business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.
ITEM 4.MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
ITEM 4.    MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not applicableapplicable.




46

PART II
ITEM 5.    MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Since April 23, 2008, ourthe Company’s common stock has traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “AWK.” The following table summarizes the per share range of the high and low intraday sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NYSE and the per share cash dividends paid and declared:
  Intraday Market Prices Per Share Dividends Paid Per Share Dividends Declared (a)
2017 High Low  
Fourth Quarter $92.37
 $80.89
 $0.415
 $0.83
Third Quarter 83.14
 77.36
 0.415
 0.415
Second Quarter 82.89
 74.63
 0.415
 0.415
First Quarter 78.73
 69.96
 0.375
 
         
  Intraday Market Prices Per Share Dividends Paid Per Share Dividends Declared (a)
2016 High Low  
Fourth Quarter $76.12
 $69.41
 $0.375
 $0.75
Third Quarter 85.24
 72.12
 0.375
 0.375
Second Quarter 84.54
 68.09
 0.375
 0.375
First Quarter 70.10
 58.90
 0.34
 
(a)Dividends declared during the three months ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, include quarterly dividends payable December 1 and March 1.
As of February 15, 2018,January 31, 2023, there were 178,551,923181,858,619 shares of common stock outstanding held by approximately 2,6442,234 record holders. Holders of ourthe Company’s common stock are entitled to receive dividends when they are declared by ourits Board of Directors. When dividends on common stock are declared, they are typically paidSee Note 9—Shareholders’ Equity in March, June, September and December. Future dividends are not guaranteed by the Company and will be dependent on future earnings, financial requirements, contractual provisions of debt agreements and other relevant factors. For moreNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding restrictions on the payment of dividends on our common stock, see Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Liquidity and Capital Resources—Dividends.Company’s dividends.
In February 2015, ourthe Board of Directors authorized an anti-dilutive common stock repurchase program to mitigate the dilutive effect of shares issued through ourthe Company’s dividend reinvestment, employee stock purchase and executive compensation activities. The program allows usthe Company to purchase up to 10 million shares of ourits outstanding common stock over an unrestricted period of time in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The program is conducted in accordance with Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act, and, to facilitate these repurchases, we enterthe Company enters into Rule 10b5-1 sharestock repurchase plans with a third partythird-party broker, which allow usthe Company to repurchase shares of its common stock at times when we mayit otherwise might be prevented from doing so under insider trading laws or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods. Subject to applicable regulations, wethe Company may elect to amend or cancel the program or sharethe stock repurchase parameters at ourits discretion to manage dilution.
From April 1, 2015, the date repurchases under the anti-dilutive stock repurchase program commenced, through December 31, 2017,2022, the Company repurchased an aggregate of 3,950,0004,860,000 shares of its common stock under the program, including 700,000leaving an aggregate of 5,140,000 shares repurchased during the first half of 2017.available for repurchase under this program. There were no repurchases of common stock in the last half2022.
ITEM 6.    [RESERVED]


47


ITEM 6.SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share data)2017 2016 2015 2014 2013
Statement of Operations data:         
Operating revenues$3,357
 $3,302
 $3,159
 $3,011
 $2,879
Income from continuing operations (a)
426
 468
 476
 430
 371
Income from continuing operations per basic common share (a)
$2.39
 $2.63
 $2.66
 $2.40
 $2.08
Income from continuing operations per diluted common share (a)
2.38
 2.62
 2.64
 2.39
 2.07
Balance Sheet data:         
Total assets (b) (c)
$19,482
 $18,482
 $17,241
 $16,038
 $15,064
Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value (b)
6,498
 5,759
 5,874
 5,442
 5,225
Other data:         
Cash dividends declared per common share$1.66
 $1.50
 $1.36
 $1.24
 $1.12
Net cash provided by operating activities (d) (e) (f)
1,449
 1,289
 1,195
 1,122
 956
Net cash used in investing activities (f)
(1,672) (1,590) (1,459) (1,029) (1,068)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities (d) (e) (f)
207
 328
 290
 (104) 104
Capital expenditures included in net cash used in investing activities(1,434) (1,311) (1,160) (956) (980)
(a)In November 2014, we disposed of our Class B Biosolids operating segment by selling our subsidiary, Terratec Environmental Ltd (“Terratec”) in Ontario, Canada. The results of Terratec are presented as discontinued operations and, as such, have been excluded from Income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013.
(b)The information for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, has been revised to reflect the retrospective application of Accounting Standard Update 2015-15, Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which was adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2015.
(c)The information for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, has been revised to reflect the retrospective application of Accounting Standard Update 2015-17, Income Taxes, which was adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2015.
(d)The information for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, has been revised to reflect the retrospective application of Accounting Standard Update 2016-09, Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting, which was adopted by the Company as of January 1, 2017.
(e)The information for the year ended December 31, 2013, has been revised to reflect the retrospective application of Accounting Standard Update 2016-15, Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which was adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2017.
(f)The information for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015, 2014 and 2013, has been revised to reflect the retrospective application of Accounting Standard Update 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230) - Restricted Cash, which was adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2017.

ITEM 7.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
ITEM 7.    MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following discussion should be read together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and the notesNotes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are based on management’s current expectations, estimates and projections about ourthe Company’s business, operations and financial performance. The cautionary statements made in this Form 10-K should be read as applying to all related forward-looking statements whenever they appear in this Form 10-K. OurThe Company’s actual results may differ materially from those currently anticipated and expressed in such forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, including those we discussthat are discussed under “Forward-Looking Statements,” Item 1A—Risk Factors and elsewhere in this Form 10-K. The Company has a disclosure committee consisting of members of senior management and other key employees involved in the preparation of the Company’s SEC reports. The disclosure committee is actively involved in the review and discussion of the Company’s SEC filings. For a discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial statements for fiscal 2021 compared to fiscal 2020, please refer to Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 16, 2022.
Overview
American Water is the largest and most geographically diverse, publicly-traded water and wastewater utility company in the United States, as measured by both operating revenues and population served. We employThe Company employs approximately 6,9006,500 professionals who provide drinking water, wastewater and other related services to an estimated 15over 14 million people in 46 states, the District of Columbia and Ontario, Canada. Our24 states. The Company’s primary business involves the ownership of utilities that provide water and wastewater services to residential, commercial, industrial, public authority, fire service and sale for resale customers, collectively presented as ourthe “Regulated Businesses.” OurThe Company’s utilities operate in 16approximately 1,600 communities in 14 states and serve approximatelyin the United States, with 3.4 million active customers based on the number of active service connections to ourwith services provided by its water and wastewater networks. Our Regulated BusinessesServices provided by the Company’s utilities are generallysubject to regulation by PUCs. The Company also operates other businesses not subject to economic regulation by certain state utility commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation, collectively referred to as PUCs. We also operate market-based businesses within four operating segments, providing a broad range of related and complementaryPUCs that provide water and wastewater services to the U.S. government on military bases, municipalities, oil and gas exploration and production companies,installations, as well as commercial, industrial and residential customers. Individually, these four operating segments do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”), and aremunicipalities, collectively presented throughout this Form 10-K within “Other.” See Item 1—Business for additional information.
Selected Financial Data
This selected financial data below should be read in conjunction with the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes in this Annual Report on Form 10-K as our Market-Based Businesses, which is consistent with how management assesseswell as the resultsremainder of these businesses.this Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.
2017
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions, except per share data)20222021202020192018
Statement of Operations data:     
Operating revenues$3,792 $3,930 $3,777 $3,610 $3,440 
Net income attributable to common shareholders820 1,263 709 621 567 
Net income attributable to common shareholders per basic common share4.51 6.96 3.91 3.44 3.16 
Net income attributable to common shareholders per diluted common share4.51 6.95 3.91 3.43 3.15 
Balance Sheet data:     
Total assets$27,787 $26,075 $24,766 $22,682 $21,223 
Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value10,929 10,344 9,333 8,644 7,576 
Other data:     
Cash dividends declared per common share$2.62 $2.41 $2.20 $2.00 $1.82 
Net cash provided by operating activities1,108 1,441 1,426 1,383 1,386 
Net cash used in investing activities(2,127)(1,536)(2,061)(1,945)(2,036)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,000 (345)1,120 494 726 
Capital expenditures included in net cash used in investing activities(2,297)(1,764)(1,822)(1,654)(1,586)
48

Financial Results
The following table provides highlights of ourFor the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, diluted earnings per share (GAAP) were $4.51, $6.95 and our adjusted$3.91, respectively. The 2021 financial results included a pre-tax gain of $748 million relating to the sale of HOS and a $45 million pre-tax contribution to the American Water Charitable Foundation, a consolidated net impact of $2.70 diluted earnings per share. After excluding the gain related to the sale of HOS and charitable contribution in 2021, diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP measure):
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Diluted earnings per share (GAAP):     
Net income attributable to common stockholders$2.38
 $2.62
 $2.64
Non-GAAP adjustments:     
Impact of Freedom Industries settlement activities(0.12) 0.36
 
Income tax impact0.05
 (0.14) 
Net non-GAAP adjustment(0.07) 0.22
 
      
Early extinguishment of debt at the parent company0.03
 
 
Income tax impact(0.01) 
 
Net non-GAAP adjustment0.02
 
 
      
Impact of re-measurement from the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act0.70
 
 
Total net non-GAAP adjustments0.65
 0.22
 
Adjusted diluted earnings per share (non-GAAP)$3.03
 $2.84
 $2.64

For the year ended December 31, 2017, net income attributable to common stockholders was $2.38 per diluted share, a decrease of $0.24 per diluted share, or 9.2%, as compared to the prior year. Includedincreased $0.26 in the 2017 amount was: (i) an after-tax benefit of $13 million, or $0.07 per diluted share, resulting from an insurance settlement with one of our general liability insurance carriers related to the Freedom Industries chemical spill; (ii) an after-tax charge of $4 million, or $(0.02) per diluted share, resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company; and (iii) a non-cash, after-tax re-measurement charge of $125 million, or $0.70 per diluted share, resulting from the impact of the change in the federal tax rate on the Company’s deferred income taxes from the enactment of the TCJA on December 22, 2017. Included in the 2016 amounts was an after-tax charge of $39 million, or $(0.22) per diluted share, resulting from the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill. For additional information, see Item 3—Legal Proceedings—West Virginia Elk River Freedom Industries Chemical Spill.
Excluding these items, adjusted diluted earnings per share (a non-GAAP measure) was $3.03 for the year ended December 31, 2017, an increase of $0.19 per diluted share, or 6.7%,2022 as compared to the prior year.2021. This increase was primarily due todriven by continued growth in our the Regulated Businesses, largely driven by from infrastructure investment acquisitions and organic growth, combined with growth in our Market-Based Businesses from our Homeowner Services Group and Keystone. These increases were partially offset by lower water services demand in 2017 in our Regulated Businesses, attributable in part to overall warmer weather in 2016,acquisitions, as well as lower capital upgrades in our Military Services Group. For further discussionorganic growth, offset somewhat by impacts from inflationary pressures on production costs and higher interest costs along with higher depreciation expenses from the growth of our consolidated resultsthe business. Results for 2022 also reflect the favorable impact of operations, as well as financial results for our Regulated Businesses segment and our Market-Based Businesses, see “Consolidated Results of Operations” and “Segment Results of Operations” for additional information.
Adjusted diluted earningsweather, estimated at $0.06 per share, represents a non-GAAP financial measureprimarily due to hot and means diluted earnings per share, calculated in accordance with GAAP, excluding the impact of: (i) the third quarter of 2017 insurance settlement related to the Freedom Industries chemical spill; (ii) the early extinguishment of debt at the parent companydry weather in the third quarter of 2017; (iii) the non-cash, after-tax re-measurement charge2022 as compared to a $0.02 per share favorable impact in 2021. Also, included in the fourth quarterresults for 2022 are $0.24 per share from interest income earned on the seller note and income earned on revenue share agreements, which compares to HOS operating results for 2021 of 2017 resulting from$0.31 per share. Lastly, the impact ofoperating results for the changeCompany’s New York subsidiary, which was sold on January 1, 2022, were $0.12 per share in 2021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the federal tax rate on the Company’s deferred income taxes from enactment of the TCJA; and (iv) the fourth quarter of 2016 binding global agreementNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Growth Through Capital Investment in principle to settle claims related to the Freedom Industries chemical spill. We believe that this non-GAAP measure provides investors with useful information by excluding certain matters that may not be indicative of our ongoing operating results,Infrastructure and that providing this non-GAAP measure will allow investors to understand better our businesses’ operating performance and facilitate a meaningful year-to-year comparison of our results of operations. Although management uses this non-GAAP financial measure internally to evaluate our results of operations, we do not intend results excluding the adjustments to represent results as defined by GAAP, and the reader should not consider them as indicators of performance. This non-GAAP financial measure is derived from our consolidated financial information but is not presented in our financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, and thus it should be considered in addition to, and not as a substitute for, measures of financial performance prepared in accordance with GAAP. In addition, this non-GAAP financial measure as defined and used above may not be comparable to similarly titled non-GAAP measures used by other companies, and, accordingly, it may have significant limitations on its use.Regulated Acquisitions
Strategic Focus and 2017 Achievements
We believe our success in the future will be driven by engaged employees, smart investments and safe, efficient operations, leading to satisfied customers which in turn will lead to constructive regulatory outcomes and sustainable financial performance. Our strategy, which is driven by our vision and core values, will continue to be anchored on our five central themes:
Customer—Our customers are at the center of everything we do. We want to be the best, and if our customers have a choice as to who serves them, we want it to be us.
In 2017, we:
achieved both a customer satisfaction rating and a service quality rating in the top quartile among our water industry peers;
expanded our customer experience initiative, designed to make it easier for customers to do business with us, and enhanced our quality of service through implementation and upgrades of technology tools; and
continued to make needed infrastructure investment while implementing operational efficiency improvements to keep customer rates affordable.
Looking forward, we will:
target the achievement of customer satisfaction and service quality targets in the top quartile of service industries, beyond the water and wastewater industry. We have a three year plan to enhance technology and innovation in our customer experience through: (i) leveraging secure artificial intelligence to better serve our customers; (ii) using on-line customer communities for immediate input and reactions before rolling out programs; and (iii) mapping our most frequent customer interactions and re-working our internal processes to how the customer wants services; and

aim for top quartile targets for drinking water quality and being an industry leader in system resiliency and environmental stewardship. We intend to continue to make needed infrastructure investments while implementing operational efficiency improvements to help keep customer rates affordable.
Safety—Safety is both a strategy and a value at American Water. We put safety first in everything that we do.
In 2017, we:
finished the year with fewer employee injuries than the prior year and exceeded our targeted results for our Occupational Safety and Health Administration recordable incident rate and our Days Away Restricted or Transferred rate; and
strengthened our safety culture as measured by employee responses to safety-related questions in the Company’s culture survey, and scored 13 points above “High Performing Companies” in the category of safety, as measured by CEB, Inc. Our safety council, consisting of management and labor employees from across theThe Company continued its mission of developing and implementing recommendations to reinforce the Company’s commitment to safety.
Looking forward, we will:
strive toward zero workplace injuries;
focus on requiring that the contractors that perform work for the Company are approved in accordance with the Contractor Safety Qualification Practice and are held to the same standards as our employees; and
continue our focus on “near miss reporting,” to promote continuous learning and corrective action regarding potential safety hazards.
People—We are building a diverse, fully-engaged, high performance workforce and culture and creating an environment where our people feel valued, included and accountable.
In 2017, we continued to demonstrate our commitment to employees by expanding training and development across the Company, with the vast majority of our employees completing at least 20 hours of training during 2017. We also added new Respect and Diversity training to strengthen our values-based culture.
Looking forward, we will continue to:
improve the diversity of our overall employee population, reflective of our customers and communities;
implement a strategic workforce plan which will address the changing requirements of our business and our jobs, and how we will fill those critical positions throughout the Company to promote continuity and help us to meet future operational needs; and
dedicate ourselves to personal development through effective training and development plans.
Growth—We expect to continuecontinues to grow ourits businesses, with the significant majority of ourits growth to be achieved in ourthe Regulated Businesses through:through (i) continued capital investment in the Company’s infrastructure to provide safe, clean, reliable and affordable water and wastewater services to our customers;its customers, and (ii) regulated acquisitions to expand ourthe Company’s services to new customers. We also expect to continue to grow our Market-Based Businesses, which leverage our core water and wastewater competencies.
In 2017, we invested $1.7 billion, a record level of annual investment since 2022,the Company went publicinvested $2.6 billion, primarily in 2008, and $200 million more than 2016, which had previously been a record year for investment. Our 2017 investment included:
$1.4 billion, of which the majority was in our Regulated Businesses, as discussed below:
Regulated Businesses Growth and Optimization
$2.3 billion capital investment in the Regulated Businesses, the substantial majority for infrastructure replacementsimprovements and improvements;replacements; and
$210315 million to fund acquisitions in ourthe Regulated Businesses, which added approximately 40,00070,000 customers during 2022, in addition to approximately 18,500 customers added through organic growth during 2022. This includes the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary’s acquisition of the wastewater system assets from the York City Sewer Authority and the City of York on May 27, 2022, for a cash purchase price of $235 million, $20 million of which was funded as a deposit to the seller in April 2021 in connection with the execution of the acquisition agreement.
On October 11, 2022, the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary entered into an agreement to acquire the wastewater assets of the Butler Area Sewer Authority for a total purchase price of $232 million in cash, subject to adjustment as provided for in the Asset Purchase Agreement. This system provides wastewater service for approximately 14,700 customer connections. The Company expects to close this acquisition by the end of 2023, pending regulatory approval.
On March 29, 2021, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary entered into an agreement to acquire the water and wastewater customers, including bulk customers, highlighted by the:
April 3, 2017 acquisitionassets of Shorelands Water Company, Inc. (“Shorelands”) in a stock transactionEgg Harbor City for $33 million in the form of 438,211 shares of our common stock. Shorelands, which is now a part of our New Jersey subsidiary, provides water service to approximately 11,000 customers in Monmouth County, New Jersey; and the

December 18, 2017 acquisition of the McKeesport system for $159$22 million. This acquisition was the first acquisition executed under Pennsylvania’s Act 12 of 2016, which allows municipalities to sellThe water and wastewater systems currently serve approximately 1,500 customers each, or 3,000 combined, and are being sold through the New Jersey Water Infrastructure Protection Act process. The Company expects to close this acquisition in early 2023.
As of December 31, 2022, the Company has entered into agreements for 21 pending acquisitions in the Regulated Businesses, including the two agreements discussed above, to add approximately 32,400 additional customers.
Sale of Homeowner Services Group
On December 9, 2021, the Company sold all of the equity interests in subsidiaries that comprised the Company’s HOS to a wholly owned subsidiary of funds advised by Apax Partners LLP, a global private equity advisory firm (the “Buyer”), for total consideration of approximately $1.275 billion, resulting in pre-tax gain of $748 million during the fourth quarter of 2021. The consideration was comprised of $480 million in cash, a seller promissory note issued by the Buyer in the principal amount of $720 million, and a contingent cash payment of $75 million payable upon satisfaction of certain conditions on or before December 31, 2023. See Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Information for additional information relating to the seller promissory note and contingent cash payment. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded post-close adjustments, primarily related to working capital, of pre-tax income of $20 million, which is included in Gain on sale of businesses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The seller note has a five-year term, is payable in cash, and bears interest at a rate of 7.00% per year during the term. The Company recognized $50 million of interest income during the year ended December 31, 2022, from the seller note.
49

The Company and the Buyer also entered into revenue share agreements, pursuant to which the Company is to receive 10% of the revenue generated from customers who are billed for home warranty services through an applicable Company subsidiary (an “on-bill” arrangement), and 15% of the revenue generated from any future on-bill arrangements entered into after the closing. Unless earlier terminated, this agreement has a term of up to 15 years, which may be renewed for up to two five-year periods. The Company recognized $9 million of income during the year ended December 31, 2022, from the revenue share agreements, which is included in Other, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Sale of New York American Water Company, Inc.
On January 1, 2022, the Company completed the previously disclosed sale of its regulated utility operations in New York to Liberty Utilities (Eastern Water Holdings) Corp. (“Liberty”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. Liberty purchased from the Company all of the capital stock of the Company’s New York subsidiary for a purchase price based uponof $608 million in cash. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the fair market valueNotes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
Sale of Michigan American Water Company
On February 4, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its operations in Michigan for $6 million in cash.
Future Growth
The Company expects to invest between $14 billion to $15 billion over the next five years, and between $30 billion to $34 billion over the next 10 years, including $2.9 billion in 2023. The Company’s expected future investments include:
capital investment for infrastructure improvements in the Regulated Businesses between $12.5 billion to $13 billion over the next five years, and between $27 billion to $30 billion over the next 10 years, including $2.5 billion expected in 2023; and
growth from acquisitions in the Regulated Businesses to expand the Company’s water and wastewater customer base of between $1.5 billion to $2 billion over the next five years, and between $3 billion to $4 billion over the next 10 years, including $400 million expected in 2023.
Presented in the following chart is the estimated allocation of the system. Under Act 12,Company’s expected capital investment for infrastructure improvements in its Regulated Businesses over the rate base for this acquisition was approved at $158 million. The McKeesport system, which is now partnext five years, by purpose:
awk-20221231_g3.jpg
50

On September 29, 2017, our Other Matters
Military Services Group
On June 30, 2022, MSG was awarded a contract for the ownership, operation, maintenance and maintenancereplacement of the water and wastewater systemsutility system assets at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, the largest single-site employerNaval Station Mayport in the state of Ohio.Jacksonville, Florida. The contract award includes estimated revenues ofwas effective July 1, 2022, and its total revenue is approximately $490$341 million over a 50-year period, subject to an annual economic price adjustment. InThe performance start date for operation is scheduled for March 1, 2023. MSG operates and maintains water and/or wastewater systems and related capital programs as part of the fourth quarter of 2017,U.S. government’s Utilities Privatization Program. This contract represents the 18th installation in MSG’s footprint and the first contract with respect to a bid protest was filed on this contract by an unsuccessful bidder. U.S. Navy installation.
Permanganate Supply Disruption
In January 2018,2023, a fire occurred at a plant owned by the bid protest was sustained becausesole supplier of permanganate in the Western Hemisphere, which has severely limited the U.S. supply of potassium and sodium permanganate, two chemicals used by water utilities to treat water. The Company is seeking to utilize alternative methods of treatment and to manage its existing supplies of permanganate, but any inability to source sufficient quantities of these chemicals or utilize alternative chemicals may have a required element ofmaterial adverse effect on the solicitation was not properly considered. The protester’s bid proposal will be re-evaluated,Company’s ability to comply with applicable environmental and we believe that the contract previously awarded to our Military Services Group will be reinstated.regulatory requirements.
Looking forward, we expect to invest between $8.0 billion to $8.6 billion from 2018 to 2022, including a range of $1.6 billion to $1.8 billion in 2018. Our expected future investment includes:
capital investment for infrastructure improvements in our Regulated Businesses of $7.2 billion over the next five years, including a range of $1.4 billion to $1.5 billion expected in 2018;
growth from acquisitions in our Regulated Businesses to expand our water and wastewater customer base of between $600 million to $1.2 billion over the next five years, including a range of $120 million to $240 million expected in 2018; and
strategic capital investments of approximately $200 million over the next five years, including approximately $100 million expected in 2018. These investments include strategic growth opportunities in our Market-Based Businesses and the construction of our new corporate headquarters in Camden, New Jersey, which is expected to be completed during the second half of 2018 and is eligible for up to $164 million in tax credits from New Jersey’s Economic Development Authority.Operational Excellence
The following chart depicts the estimated allocation of our expected capital investment for infrastructure improvements in our Regulated Businesses from 2018 to 2022, by purpose:

Technology and Operational Efficiency—We continue to strive for industry-leading operational efficiency, driven by technology. Our technology investments are aimed at enhancing our customer experience and operational efficiency.
In 2017:
our Regulated Businesses achieved anCompany’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio (a non-GAAP measure) of 33.8%was 33.7% for the year ended December 31, 2017,2022, compared to 34.9% and 35.9%34.1% for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.2021. The continued improvement in our adjusted O&M efficiency ratio in 2017 was attributable to bothreflects an increase in operating revenues and a decrease in O&M expenses (seefor the following table). The improvementRegulated Businesses, after considering the adjustment for the amortization of the excess accumulated deferred income taxes (“EADIT”) shown in the 2016 adjusted O&M efficiency ratio overtable below, as well as the 2015 ratio was primarily attributable to an increase in operating revenues;
we introduced new tools such as FSR Customer One View, which provides our employees with information such as neighborhood maps, customer usage data, billing and payment history, and real-time meter reads; and MapCall, which helps to manage location based assets such as hydrants, valves, meters, among others; along with implementing technology upgrades to our national customer services, focused on helping us improve customer service;
we continued our commitment to water quality and the environment by leveraging new technologies; we now have advanced water quality sensors at all of our major drinking water intake sites and we are automating our reporting and compliance systems; and
we implemented other technology tools that will enhance communication, collaboration and mobility to help our operations and support employees work more safely and efficiently, and enhance the customer experience.
Looking forward, we will focus on technology and efficiency to:operating costs.
be the leader in optimizing technology deployment across the water and wastewater industry, with a keen focus on specific, innovative projects that will set us apart from other utilities, and to help us serve our customers with greater ease, make us safer and help us operate more efficiently; and
achieve our goal of anThe Company’s adjusted O&M efficiency ratio equal to or below 32.0% by 2022.
Our adjustedregulated O&M efficiency ratio is a non-GAAP measure and is defined by the Company as our regulatedits operation and maintenance expenses from the Regulated Businesses, divided by our regulatedthe operating revenues from the Regulated Businesses, where both operation and maintenance expenses and operating revenues were adjusted to eliminate purchased water expense. Additionally,Operating revenues were further adjusted to exclude reductions for the amortization of the EADIT. Also excluded from operation and maintenance expenses we have excludedis the allocable portion of non-operation and maintenancenon-O&M support services costs, mainly depreciation and general taxes, that arewhich is reflected in ourthe Regulated Businesses segment as operation and maintenance expenses, but for consolidated financial reporting purposes, areis categorized within other line items in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, we have alsoThe items discussed above were excluded from operation and maintenance expenses the impact of certain Freedom Industries chemical spill settlement activities. We excluded all of the above items from theO&M efficiency ratio calculation as we believe such itemsthey are not reflective of management’s ability to increase the efficiency of our regulated operations. Going forward, we expect changes to our adjusted O&M efficiency ratio related to the impact of the enactment of the TCJA and the adoption of new accounting standards in the future.Regulated Businesses.
We evaluate ourThe Company evaluates its operating performance using this ratio, and believes it is useful to investors because we believe it directly measures improvement in the operating performance and efficiency of our regulated operations.the Regulated Businesses. This information is intendedderived from the Company’s consolidated financial information but is not presented in its financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP. This information supplements and should be read in conjunction with the Company’s GAAP disclosures, and should be considered as an addition to, enhance an investor’s overall understanding of our operating performance. Ourand not a substitute for, any GAAP measure. The Company’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio (i) is not an accounting measure that is based on GAAP; (ii) is not based on a GAAP financial measure andstandard, objective industry definition or method of calculation; (iii) may not be comparable to other companies’ operating measures,measures; and (iv) should not be used in place of the GAAP information provided elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
With respect to our adjusted O&M efficiency ratio goal for 2022, we are unable to provide without unreasonable efforts a quantitative reconciliation
51

Presented in the most comparable financial measure calculated in accordance with GAAP. In calculating the components of the ratio, certain items that may ultimately be excluded would be reflective of events that cannot be reasonably predicted at this time. The unavailable information would include, among other things, the impact of items currently excluded fromtable below is the calculation of the components, adjustments for weather conditions that exceed a certain threshold of variability and adjustments for events or circumstances that may not be reflective of ongoing operating results. The probable significance of these items is also presently unknown and cannot be reasonably estimated.

The following table provides the calculation of ourCompany’s adjusted regulated O&M efficiency ratio and a reconciliation that compares operation and maintenance expenses and operating revenues, each as determined in accordance with GAAP, to those amounts utilized in the calculation of ourits adjusted O&M efficiency ratio:
For the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)202220212020
Total operation and maintenance expenses$1,589 $1,777 $1,622 
Less:   
Operation and maintenance expenses—Other244 452 364 
Total operation and maintenance expenses—Regulated Businesses1,345 1,325 1,258 
Less:   
Regulated purchased water expenses154 153 149 
Allocation of non-operation and maintenance expenses31 34 41 
Adjusted operation and maintenance expenses—Regulated Businesses (i)
$1,160 $1,138 $1,068 
Total operating revenues$3,792 $3,930 $3,777 
Less:   
Operating revenues—Other287 546 522 
Total operating revenues—Regulated Businesses3,505 3,384 3,255 
Less:   
Regulated purchased water revenues (a)
154 153 149 
Revenue reductions from the amortization of EADIT(89)(104)(7)
Adjusted operating revenues—Regulated Businesses (ii)
$3,440 $3,335 $3,113 
Adjusted O&M efficiency ratio—Regulated Businesses (i) / (ii)
33.7 %34.1 %34.3 %
(a)    The calculation assumes regulated purchased water revenues approximate regulated purchased water expenses.
52
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(Dollars in millions)2017 2016 2015
Total operation and maintenance expenses$1,378
 $1,504
 $1,404
Less:     
Operation and maintenance expenses—Market-Based Businesses337
 372
 358
Operation and maintenance expenses—Other(50) (44) (49)
Total operation and maintenance expenses—Regulated Businesses1,091
 1,176
 1,095
Less:     
Regulated purchased water expenses128
 122
 117
Allocation of non-operation and maintenance expenses29
 30
 35
Impact of Freedom Industries settlement activities (a)
(22) 65
 
Adjusted operation and maintenance expenses—Regulated Businesses (i)
$956
 $959
 $943
      
Total operating revenues$3,357
 $3,302
 $3,159
Less:     
Operating revenues—Market-Based Businesses422
 451
 434
Operating revenues—Other(23) (20) (18)
Total operating revenues—Regulated Businesses2,958
 2,871
 2,743
Less:     
Regulated purchased water revenues (b)
128
 122
 117
Adjusted operating revenues—Regulated Businesses (ii)
$2,830
 $2,749
 $2,626
      
Adjusted O&M efficiency ratio—Regulated Businesses (i) / (ii)
33.8% 34.9% 35.9%
 (a)Includes the impact of the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims in 2016 and a settlement with one of our general liability insurance carriers in 2017.
 (b)The calculation assumes regulated purchased water revenues approximate regulated purchased water expenses.

Regulatory Matters
The followingGeneral Rate Cases
Presented in the table provides general rate case authorizations effective from 2015 through 2017, and depictsbelow are annualized incremental revenues, including reductions for the amortization of EADIT that are generally offset in income tax expense, assuming a constant water sales volume:volume and customer count, resulting from general rate case authorizations that became effective during 2022:
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
General rate case authorizations by state: 
  
  
New York (effective June 1, 2017)
$4
 $
 $
Virginia (a)
5
 
 
Iowa (effective March 27, 2017)
4
 
 
California (b)
5
 2
 5
Illinois (effective January 1, 2017)
25
 
 
Kentucky (effective August 28, 2016)

 7
 
Missouri (effective July 20, 2016 and July 22, 2016)

 5
 
West Virginia (effective February 25, 2016)

 18
 
Indiana (effective January 29, 2016 and January 29, 2015)

 2
 5
New Jersey (effective September 21, 2015)

 
 22
Other
 
 1
Total general rate case authorizations$43
 $34
 $33
(a)(In millions)The effective date of theEffective DateAmount
General rate order was May 24, 2017, authorizing the implementation of interim rates as of April 1, 2016.cases by state:
(b)New JerseySeptember 1, 2022$46 
HawaiiJuly 1, 2022
West VirginiaFebruary 25, 202213 
California, Step rates for 2017 effective January 13, 2017 through February 2, 2017. Step rates for 2016 and 2015 effective IncreaseJanuary 1, 2016 and 2022
Pennsylvania, Step IncreaseJanuary 1, 2015, respectively.202220 
Total general rate case authorizations$90 
On December 7, 2017,Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, including reductions for the amortization of EADIT that are generally offset in income tax expense, assuming a settlement in our Pennsylvania subsidiary’sconstant water sales volume and customer count, resulting from general rate case authorizations that became effective on or after January 1, 2023:
(In millions)Effective DateAmount
General rate cases by state:
PennsylvaniaJanuary 28, 2023$138 
IllinoisJanuary 1, 202367 
California, Step IncreaseJanuary 1, 202313 
Total general rate case authorizations$218 
On December 15, 2022, the Illinois Commerce Commission issued an order approving the adjustment of base rates requested in a rate case filed on February 10, 2022, by the Company’s Illinois subsidiary. As updated in the Illinois subsidiary’s June 29, 2022 rebuttal filing, was approved authorizingthe request sought $83 million in additional annualized revenues of $62excluding previously recovered infrastructure surcharges. The general rate case order approved a $67 million, annualized increase in water and wastewater system revenues excluding previously recovered infrastructure surcharges, effective on January 1, 20182023, based on an authorized return on equity of 9.8%, authorized rate base of $1.64 billion, a common equity ratio of 49.0% and a debt ratio of 51.0%. The annualized revenue increase is being driven primarily by significant water and wastewater system capital investments since the Illinois subsidiary’s 2017 rate case order that have been completed or are planned through December 31, 2023, expected higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs, and increases in production costs, including chemicals, fuel and power costs.
On December 8, 2022, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission issued an order approving the joint settlement of the rate case filed on April 29, 2022, by the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary. The general rate case order approved a $138 million annualized increase in water and wastewater revenues and authorizes implementation of the new water and wastewater rates effective January 28, 2023. The rate case proceeding was resolved through a “black box” settlement agreement and did not specify an approved return on equity (“ROE”). The annualized revenue increase is driven primarily by significant incremental capital investments since the Pennsylvania subsidiary’s 2021 rate case order that will be completed through December 31, 2023, increases in pension and other postretirement benefits expense and increases in production costs, including chemicals, fuel and power costs. The general rate case order also includes recovery of the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary’s COVID-19 deferral balance.
On August 17, 2022, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary was authorized additional annual revenues of $46 million in its general rate case, effective September 1, 2022, based on an authorized return on equity of 9.6%, authorized rate base of $4.15 billion, a common equity ratio of 54.6% and a long-term debt ratio of 45.4%. The request incorporated updated estimates of production costs, including chemicals, fuel and power costs. Beginning January 1, 2023, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary will defer as a regulatory asset or liability, as appropriate, the difference between its pension expense and other postretirement benefits expense and those amounts included in base rates. The deferral period for this regulatory asset or liability will be two years or, if earlier, will end at the conclusion of the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary’s next general rate case. The Company’s New Jersey subsidiary also withdrew its request, without prejudice, to recover its existing authorized COVID-19-related regulatory asset in the general rate case and will seek recovery in a separate proceeding within the process established in the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities’ (the “NJBPU”) generic COVID-19-related proceeding.
53

On February 24, 2022, WVAWC was authorized additional annual revenues of $13 million in its general rate case, effective February 25, 2022, based on an authorized return on equity of 9.8%, authorized rate base of $734 million and a common equity ratio of 47.9%. Staff of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia moved for reconsideration of the final order on several grounds. WVAWC filed its response to the Staff's Petition for Reconsideration on March 28, 2022, in support of the authorized revenue requirement. On October 21, 2022, the Public Service Commission of West Virginia denied the motion for reconsideration.
Pending General Rate Case and Cost of Capital Filings
On September 15, 2017, our New JerseyJuly 1, 2022, the Company’s California subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $129an increase in 2024 revenue of $56 million and a total increase in revenue over the 2024 to 2026 period of $95 million, with all increases compared against 2022 revenues. The Company updated its filing in January 2023 to capture the authorized step increase effective January 1, 2023. The filing was also updated to incorporate a decoupling proposal and a revision to the Company’s sales and associated variable expense forecast. The revised requested additional annualized waterrevenues for the test year 2024 is now $37 million, compared against 2023 revenues. This excludes the proposed step rate and wastewater revenues.attrition rate increase for 2025 and 2026 of $20 million and $19 million, respectively. The total revenue requirement request for the three-year rate case cycle, incorporating updates to present rate revenues and forecasted demand, is $76 million.
On June 30, 2017, ourJuly 1, 2022, the Company’s Missouri subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $84$105 million in additional annualized water and wastewater revenues.
On April 3, 2017, our California subsidiary filed an application requesting a cost of capital of 8.49%, compared to 8.41% currently authorized. On February 6, 2018, a proposed decision was issued byNovember 15, 2021, the administrative law judge and we plan to work through the regulatory process with the CPUC over the next several months.
During the third quarter of 2016, our CaliforniaCompany’s Virginia subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $35$14 million in additional annualized revenuesrevenues. Interim rates were effective on May 1, 2022, and an increase of $8the difference between interim and final approved rates is subject to refund. On September 26, 2022, a settlement agreement, supported by all parties except one, was filed with the Virginia State Corporation Commission for a $11 million annual revenue increase. Public hearings were held on September 27 and 28, 2022. A final decision on this matter is expected in the escalation year of 2019 and the attrition year of 2020. During the fourthfirst quarter of 2016, our2023.
The Company’s California subsidiary filed an updatesubmitted its application on May 3, 2021, to set its general rate case, adjusting its requestcost of capital for additional annualized revenues2022 through 2024. According to $32 million and increasing its requestthe CPUC’s procedural schedule, a decision setting the authorized cost of capital is expected to $9 millionbe issued in the escalation yearfirst quarter of 2019.2023.

Infrastructure Surcharges
A number of states have authorized the use of regulatory mechanisms that permit rates to be adjusted outside of a general rate case for certain costs and investments, such as infrastructure surcharge mechanisms that permit recovery of capital investments to replace aging infrastructure.
The following Presented in the table provides infrastructure surcharge authorizations effective from 2015 through 2017, and depictsbelow are annualized incremental revenues, assuming a constant water sales volume:volume and customer count, resulting from infrastructure surcharge authorizations that became effective during 2022:
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Infrastructure surcharge authorizations by state:     
Missouri (effective December 15, 2017 and June 27, 2015)
$6
 $
 $2
New Jersey (a)
14
 19
 9
Indiana (effective March 22, 2017 and May 4, 2016)
8
 3
 
Tennessee (effective March 14, 2017, March 15, 2016 and June 29, 2015)
2
 2
 2
Pennsylvania (b)
1
 28
 14
West Virginia (effective January 1, 2017)
2
 
 
Illinois (c)

 7
 6
New York (effective December 1, 2015)

 
 1
Total infrastructure surcharge authorizations$33
 $59
 $34
(a)(In millions)For 2017, $10 million effective June 1 and $4 million effective December 10. For 2016, $9 million effective June 1 and $10 million effective December 1. For 2015, $9 million effective January 1.Effective DateAmount
Infrastructure surcharges by state:
(b)New JerseyFor 2017, $1 million effective (a)$11 
Pennsylvania(b)19 
Missouri(c)30 
TennesseeAugust 8, 2022
KentuckyJuly 1, 2022
IndianaMarch 21, 2022
West VirginiaMarch 1, 2022
IllinoisJanuary 1, (the2022
Total infrastructure surcharge cap was reached after the first quarter of 2017). For 2016, $11 million, $2 million, $6 million and $9 million effective January 1, April 1, July 1 and October 1, respectively. For 2015, $2 million, $4 million and $8 million effective April 1, July 1 and October 1, respectively.authorizations$83 
(a)In 2022, $1 million was effective December 30 and $10 million was effective June 27.
(b)In 2022, $8 million was effective on October 1, $9 million was effective July 1 and $2 million was effective April 1.
(c)In 2022, $18 million was effective August 11 and $12 million was effective February 1.
54

Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, assuming a constant water sales volume and customer count, resulting from infrastructure surcharge authorizations that became effective on or after January 1, 2023:
(c)(In millions)For 2016, $1 million effective Effective DateAmount
Infrastructure surcharge filings by state:
MissouriJanuary 16, 2023$15 
West VirginiaJanuary 1, and $6 million effective August 1. For 2015, $5 million effective 2023
PennsylvaniaJanuary 1, and $1 million effective February 1.2023
Total infrastructure surcharge filings$25 
On December 28, 2017, our West Virginia subsidiary received a decision on its infrastructure surcharge filing authorizing additional annualized revenues of $3 million, effective on January 1, 2018. Additionally, on December 20, 2017, our Illinois subsidiary filed for an infrastructure surcharge requesting $3 million in additional annualized revenues, which will become effective on January 1, 2018.
There is no assurance that all or any portion of these requests will be granted.
Pending Infrastructure Surcharge Filings
The following table details of our pendingOn January 20, 2023, the Company’s Indiana subsidiary filed an infrastructure surcharge filings:proceeding requesting $21 million in additional annualized revenue
(In millions)Date Filed Amount
Pending infrastructure surcharge filings by state:   
IndianaJanuary 18, 2018 $7
TennesseeNovember 7, 2017 2
VirginiaOctober 31, 2017 1
Total pending infrastructure surcharge filings  $10
There is no assurance that all or any portion of these requests will be granted.On November 18, 2022, the Company’s Indiana subsidiary filed an infrastructure surcharge proceeding requesting $7 million in additional annualized revenues.
Other Regulatory Matters
In September 2020, the CPUC released a decision under its Low-Income Rate Payer Assistance program rulemaking that required the Company’s California subsidiary to file a proposal to alter its water revenue adjustment mechanism in its next general rate case filing in 2022, which would become effective in January 2024. On August 4, 2017, our IllinoisOctober 5, 2020, the Company’s California subsidiary filed an application for rehearing of the decision and following the CPUC’s denial of its rehearing application in September 2021, the Company’s California subsidiary filed a petition for writ of review with the Illinois Commerce CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court on October 27, 2021. On May 18, 2022, the California Supreme Court issued a writ of review for the Company’s California subsidiary’s petition and the petitions filed by other entities challenging the decision. Independent of the judicial challenge, California passed Senate Bill 1469, which allows the CPUC to consider and authorize the implementation of a mechanism that separates the water corporation’s revenue and its water sales. Legislation was signed by the Governor on September 30, 2022, and became effective on January 1, 2023. In response to the legislation, on January 27, 2023, the Company’s California subsidiary filed an updated application requesting the CPUC to consider a Water Resources Sustainability Plan decoupling mechanism in its pending 2022 general rate case, which would be effective 2024 through 2026.
On March 2, 2021, an administrative law judge (“ICC”ALJ”) to place into effect, revised depreciation rates applicable to our depreciablein the Office of Administrative Law of New Jersey filed an initial decision with the NJBPU that recommended denial of a petition filed by the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary, which sought approval of acquisition adjustments in rate base of $29 million associated with the acquisitions of Shorelands Water Company, Inc. in 2017 and the Borough of Haddonfield’s water and wastewater plant, resulting fromsystems in 2015. On July 29, 2021, the NJBPU issued an order adopting the ALJ’s initial decision without modification. The Company’s New Jersey subsidiary filed a new depreciation study.Notice of Appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division on September 10, 2021. The petition requested that these new rates would be effective January 1, 2017. On November 21, 2017,Company’s New Jersey subsidiary filed its brief in support of the ICC approved this petition, which resulted in lower depreciation expense of $16 million in 2017.

Tax Matters
Tax Cutsappeal on March 4, 2022. Response and Jobs Act
On DecemberReply briefs were filed on June 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law, which, among other things, enacted significant2022, and complex changesAugust 4, 2022, respectively. There is no financial impact to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%Company as of January 1, 2018, and certain other provisions related specifically to the public utility industry, including continuation of interest expense deductibility, the exclusion from utilizing bonus depreciation and the normalization of deferred income tax. The enactment of the TCJA required a re-measurement of our deferred income taxes that materially impacted our 2017 results of operations and financial position. The portion of this re-measurement related to our Regulated Businesses was substantially offset by a regulatory liability, as we believe it is probable that the deferred income tax excesses created by the TCJA will be refunded to customers in future rates. The remaining portion of this re-measurement of the net deferred income tax liability was recorded as a non-cash charge to earnings of $125 million during the fourth quarter of 2017.
Other Tax Matters
On April 11, 2017, the state of New York enacted legislation that increased the state income tax rate on our taxable income attributable to New York. This legislation eliminated the production of water as a qualified manufacturing activity in New York, which effectively increased the state income tax rate in New York. As a result of the legislative change, we were required to re-measure our cumulative deferred income tax balances usingNJBPU’s order, since the higher state income tax rate inacquisition adjustments are currently recorded as goodwill on the second quarterConsolidated Balance Sheets.
55

On July 7, 2017, the State of Illinois enacted legislation that increased, effective July 1, 2017, the state income tax rate on our taxable income attributable to Illinois from 7.75% to 9.5%. As a result of the legislative change, we were required to re-measure our cumulative deferred income tax balances using the higher state income tax rate in the third quarter of 2017. This change in legislation was the primary cause of an increase to our unitary deferred income tax liability of $7 million. The portion of this increase related to our Illinois subsidiary calculated on a stand-alone basis was $4 million, and was offset by a regulatory asset, as we believe it is probable of recovery in future rates. The remaining increase in the deferred income tax liability was recorded at the consolidated level, resulting in a non-cash, cumulative charge to earnings of $3 million during the third quarter of 2017.

Consolidated Results of Operations
The followingPresented in the table presents ourbelow are the Company’s consolidated results of operations and the ensuing discussions provide explanations for the variances related to the major components:operations:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
(In millions) 
Operating revenues$3,792 $3,930 $3,777 
Operating expenses:   
Operation and maintenance1,589 1,777 1,622 
Depreciation and amortization649 636 604 
General taxes281 321 303 
Total operating expenses, net2,519 2,734 2,529 
Operating income1,273 1,196 1,248 
Other income (expense):   
Interest expense(433)(403)(397)
Interest income52 
Non-operating benefit costs, net77 78 49 
Gain on sale of businesses19 747 — 
Other, net20 18 22 
Total other income (expense)(265)444 (324)
Income before income taxes1,008 1,640 924 
Provision for income taxes188 377 215 
Net income attributable to common shareholders$820 $1,263 $709 
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Operating revenues$3,357
 $3,302
 $3,159
 $55
 1.7
 $143
 4.5
Operating expenses:             
Operation and maintenance1,378
 1,504
 1,404
 (126) (8.4) 100
 7.1
Depreciation and amortization492
 470
 440
 22
 4.7
 30
 6.8
General taxes259
 258
 243
 1
 0.4
 15
 6.2
Gain on asset dispositions and purchases(16) (10) (3) (6) 60.0
 (7) 233.3
Total operating expenses, net2,113
 2,222
 2,084
 (109) (4.9) 138
 6.6
Operating income1,244
 1,080
 1,075
 164
 15.2
 5
 0.5
Other income (expense):             
Interest, net(342) (325) (308) (17) 5.2
 (17) 5.5
Loss on early extinguishment of debt(7) 
 
 (7) 100.0
 
 
Other, net17
 15
 15
 2
 13.3
 
 
Total other income (expense)(332) (310) (293) (22) 7.1
 (17) 5.8
Income before income taxes912
 770
 782
 142
 18.4
 (12) (1.5)
Provision for income taxes486
 302
 306
 184
 60.9
 (4) (1.3)
Net income attributable to common stockholders$426
 $468
 $476
 $(42) (9.0) $(8) (1.7)
Operating Revenues
In 2017, operating revenues increased $55 million, or 1.7%, primarily due to a:
$87 million increase in our Regulated Businesses principally due to authorized rate increases to fund infrastructure investment growth, as well as acquisitions and organic growth, offset in part by lower water services demand in 2017, including a $15 million reduction due to warmer weather in 2016; partially offset by a
$29 million decrease in our Market-Based Businesses mainly due to lower capital upgrades in our Military Services Group, driven largely by reduced military base budgets, offset in part by incremental revenues in our Homeowner Services Group from contract growth and price increases, and in Keystone from an increase in operations as a result of market recovery in the natural gas industry.
In 2016, operating revenues increased $143 million, or 4.5%, primarily due to a:
$128 million increase in our Regulated Businesses principally due to authorized rate increases to fund infrastructure investment growth, as well as acquisitions and organic growth; and a
$17 million increase in our Market-Based Businesses mainly due to our acquisition of Keystone in the third quarter of 2015 and incremental revenues from our Homeowner Services and Contract Operations Groups from contract growth, partially offset by lower capital upgrades in our Military Services Group.
Operation and Maintenance
In 2017, operation and maintenance expense decreased $126 million, or 8.4%, primarily due to a:
$85 million decrease in our Regulated Businesses principally due to a $65 million net charge recorded in 2016, resulting from the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginia, and a $22 million benefit recorded in 2017, resulting from a related insurance settlement with one of our general liability insurance carriers; and a

$35 million decrease in our Market-Based Businesses mainly due to lower capital upgrades in our Military Services Group, as discussed above, partially offset by higher employee-related costs from growth in Keystone and increased customer uncollectible expense in Homeowner Services from contract growth during 2017.
In 2016, operation and maintenance expense increased $100 million, or 7.1%, primarily due to a:
$81 million increase in our Regulated Businesses principally due to a $65 million charge recorded in 2016, resulting from the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginia, as well as higher employee-related costs and litigation expenses, partially offset by lower casualty insurance and customer uncollectible expense; and an
$14 million increase in our Market-Based Businesses which included $11 million from our acquisition of Keystone in the third quarter of 2015, as well as incremental costs associated with growth in our Homeowner Services and Contract Operations Group, partially offset by lower capital upgrades in our Military Services Group, as discussed above.
Depreciation and Amortization
In 2017 and 2016, depreciation and amortization expense increased $22 million and $30 million, or 4.7% and 6.8%, respectively. The increase for both periods was primarily due to additional utility plant placed in service. Included in 2017 was the impact of revised depreciation rates from a depreciation study approved by the ICC in our Illinois subsidiary, resulting in lower depreciation expense of $16 million. Included in 2016 was incremental depreciation and amortization expense resulting from our acquisition of Keystone in the third quarter of 2015.
General Taxes
In 2017 and 2016, general taxes increased $1 million and $15 million, or 0.4% and 6.2%, respectively. The increase in 2016 was primarily due to incremental property and gross receipts taxes in our Regulated Businesses.
Gain on Asset Dispositions and Purchases
In 2017 and 2016, gain on asset dispositions and purchases increased $6 million and $7 million, or 60.0% and 233.3%, respectively. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to a $7 million gain recognized on a land sale in our Kentucky subsidiary. The increase in 2016 was largely attributable to a gains recognized on a land sale in our Pennsylvania subsidiary and an acquisition in our Missouri subsidiary.
Other Income (Expense)
In 2017 and 2016, other expenses increased $22 million and $17 million, or 7.1% and 5.8%, respectively. The increase in 2017 was primarily due to an increase in interest expense from the issuance of incremental long-term debt in 2017 and the fourth quarter of 2016, as well as a $6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company. The increase in 2016 was largely attributable to an increase in interest expense from the issuance of incremental long-term debt, as well as an increase in short-term interest expense, mainly due to higher levels of short-term borrowings during 2016, coupled with an increase in the average short-term borrowing rates in 2016, as compared to the prior year.
Provision for Income Taxes
In 2017, our provision for income taxes increased by $184 million, or 60.9%, from the previous year. The increase is primarily due to higher pretax income and a non-cash, after-tax re-measurement charge of $125 million, resulting from the impact of the change in the federal tax rate on the Company’s deferred income taxes from the enactment of the TCJA, which included a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21%. The $125 million charge includes $6 million allocated to our Regulated Businesses segment, $5 million to our Market-Based Businesses and $114 million to our Other segment. In 2016, our provision for income taxes decreased $4 million, or 1.3%, from the previous year. This decrease was primarily due to the decrease in pre-tax income. The effective tax rates were 53.3%, 39.2% and 39.1% for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As of December 31, 2017, we’ve recognized federal NOL carryforwards of $1.05 billion. The TCJA eliminated the bonus depreciation deduction for property acquired or constructed after September 27, 2017, and we currently expect to utilize the benefits of our federal NOL carryforwards over the next two years. See Note 13—Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

Segment Results of Operations
OurThe Company’s operating segments are determined based on how wecomprised of its businesses which generate revenue, incur expense and have separate financial information which is regularly used by management to make operating decisions, assess performance and allocate resources. We evaluateThe Company operates its business primarily through one reportable segment, the performance of our segments and allocate resources based on several factors, with the primary measure being net income attributable to common stockholders. The majority of our business is conducted through our Regulated Businesses reportable segment. We also operate several market-based businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services within four operating segments that individually doOther primarily includes MSG, which does not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with GAAP. These four, non-reportable operating segmentsOther also includes corporate costs that are collectively presented as our Market-Basednot allocated to the Regulated Businesses which segment, interest income related to the seller promissory note and income from the revenue share agreement from the sale of HOS, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and fair value adjustments related to acquisitions that have not been allocated to the Regulated Businesses segment.This presentation is consistent with how management assesses the results of these businesses. For a discussion and analysis of the Company’s financial statements for fiscal 2021 compared to fiscal 2020, please refer to Item 7—Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021, filed with the SEC on February 16, 2022.
As a result of the sale of HOS, the categories which were previously shown as “Market-Based Businesses” and “Other” have been combined and shown as Other. Segment results for the year ended December 31, 2021, have been adjusted retrospectively to reflect this change.
56

Regulated Businesses Segment
The followingPresented in the table summarizes certainbelow is financial information for ourthe Regulated Businesses:
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions) 
  
  
 $ % $ %
Operating revenues$2,958
 $2,871
 $2,743
 $87
 3.0
 $128
 4.7
Operation and maintenance1,091
 1,176
 1,095
 (85) (7.2) 81
 7.4
Operating expenses, net1,781
 1,852
 1,732
 (71) (3.8) 120
 6.9
Net income attributable to common stockholders559
 472
 473
 87
 18.4
 (1) (0.2)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
(In millions)   
Operating revenues$3,505 $3,384 $3,255 
Operation and maintenance1,345 1,325 1,258 
Depreciation and amortization633 601 562 
General taxes264 301 285 
Other operating expenses— (3)
Other income (expense)(220)(195)(221)
Income before income taxes1,042 962 932 
Provision for income taxes188 172 217 
Net income attributable to common shareholders$854 $789 $715 
Operating Revenues
The followingPresented in the tables below is information regarding the main components of the Regulated Businesses’ operating revenues:
For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(In millions)
Water services:   
Residential$1,941 $1,935 $1,895 
Commercial710 676 627 
Fire service147 151 147 
Industrial153 141 133 
Public and other267 239 226 
Total water services3,218 3,142 3,028 
Wastewater services:
Residential174 151 134 
Commercial45 37 34 
Industrial
Public and other19 16 14 
Total wastewater services242 208 185 
Other (a)
45 34 42 
Total operating revenues$3,505 $3,384 $3,255 
(a)Includes other operating revenues consisting primarily of miscellaneous utility charges, fees and the ensuing discussions provide explanationsrents.
57

 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(Gallons in millions)
Billed water services volumes:   
Residential162,105 173,644 178,753 
Commercial77,627 77,476 75,875 
Industrial37,265 35,738 34,875 
Fire service, public and other51,966 51,957 49,031 
Total billed water services volumes328,963 338,815 338,534 
Included in operating revenues for the variances2021, was $127 million related to the three components of operating revenues––water services revenues, wastewater services revenues and other revenues:
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Billed water services revenues:             
Residential$1,654
 $1,592
 $1,536
 $62
 3.9
 $56
 3.6
Commercial603
 580
 559
 23
 4.0
 21
 3.8
Industrial137
 134
 130
 3
 2.2
 4
 3.1
Public and other351
 338
 331
 13
 3.8
 7
 2.1
Other31
 53
 39
 (22) (41.5) 14
 35.9
Total billed water services revenues2,776
 2,697
 2,595
 79
 2.9
 102
 3.9
Unbilled water services revenues(11) 13
 (3) (24) (184.6) 16
 (533.3)
Total water services revenues2,765
 2,710
 2,592
 55
 2.0
 118
 4.6
Wastewater services revenues142
 112
 97
 30
 26.8
 15
 15.5
Other revenues51
 49
 54
 2
 4.1
 (5) (9.3)
Total operating revenues$2,958
 $2,871
 $2,743
 $87
 3.0
 $128
 4.7

 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Gallons in millions)      Gallons % Gallons %
Billed water services volumes:             
Residential174,420
 174,599
 175,653
 (179) (0.1) (1,054) (0.6)
Commercial82,147
 82,489
 81,772
 (342) (0.4) 717
 0.9
Industrial39,404
 38,465
 38,991
 939
 2.4
 (526) (1.3)
Public and other51,341
 50,678
 51,324
 663
 1.3
 (646) (1.3)
Total billed water services volumes347,312
 346,231
 347,740
 1,081
 0.3
 (1,509) (0.4)
Note:The correlation between water revenues and billed water volumes shown in the preceding tables is impacted by the California drought. In 2015, and to a lesser extent in 2016, California experienced a severe drought. In April 2015, the Governor mandated water usage restrictions to reduce overall water usage by 25% in the state compared to 2013 levels. In April 2017, the mandated water usage restrictions were removed. In California, revenue is decoupled from sales volume through the WRAM/MCBA, aligning our water conservation goals with those of the state and our customers, and therefore usage reductions do not impact earnings.
In 2017,Company’s New York operations. Excluding the Company’s New York operations, for 2022, operating revenues increased $87$248 million, or 3.0%, primarily due to a:
$81to: (i) a $180 million increase from authorized rate increases, including infrastructure surcharges, principally to fund infrastructure investment growth in various states;
$43 (ii) a $36 million increase attributable tofrom water and wastewater acquisitions, as well as organic growth in existing systems; (iii) a $17 million net increase as a result of reduced amortization of EADIT, primarily in the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary; and (iv) a
$9 $13 million estimated net increase resulting from higher wastewater treatment volumesprimarily due to warmer and an increasedrier than normal weather in private firethe third quarter of 2022 in the Company’s New Jersey and Missouri service connections;territories, which was partially offset by a
$48 million decrease due to lower water services demand, including a $15 million reduction due to warmer and drier than normal weather in 2016.
In 2016, operating revenues increased $128 million, or 4.7%, primarily due to a:
$92 million increase from authorized rate increases, including infrastructure surcharges, principally to fund investment growththe second quarter of 2021 in various states;
$19 million increase attributable to water and wastewater acquisitions, as well as organic growth in existing systems;
$4 million increase resulting from higher wastewater treatment volumes and an increase in private fire service connections; and
$13 million increase mainly due to revenues from balancing accounts, primarily in our California subsidiary, as well as surcharges and other adjustments.the Northeast.
Operation and Maintenance
The following tablesPresented in the table below is information regarding the main components of the Regulated Businesses’ operating and the ensuing discussions provide explanationsmaintenance expense:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(In millions) 
Employee-related costs$505 $522 $495 
Production costs387 353 335 
Operating supplies and services242 245 242 
Maintenance materials and supplies96 93 84 
Customer billing and accounting59 66 58 
Other56 46 44 
Total$1,345 $1,325 $1,258 
Employee-Related Costs
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(In millions) 
Salaries and wages$395 $402 $382 
Group insurance59 66 65 
Pensions21 25 20 
Other benefits30 29 28 
Total$505 $522 $495 
Included in employee-related costs for the variances2021, was $16 million related to the major components of operation and maintenance expense:
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Production costs$298
 $288
 $282
 $10
 3.5
 $6
 2.1
Employee-related costs446
 443
 430
 3
 0.7
 13
 3.0
Operating supplies and services209
 212
 194
 (3) (1.4) 18
 9.3
Maintenance materials and supplies70
 73
 70
 (3) (4.1) 3
 4.3
Customer billing and accounting51
 54
 63
 (3) (5.6) (9) (14.3)
Other17
 106
 56
 (89) (84.0) 50
 89.3
Total$1,091
 $1,176
 $1,095
 $(85) (7.2) $81
 7.4

Production Costs
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Purchased water$128
 $122
 $117
 $6
 4.9 $5
 4.3
Fuel and power89
 87
 89
 2
 2.3 (2) (2.2)
Chemicals47
 47
 48
 
  (1) (2.1)
Waste disposal34
 32
 28
 2
 6.3 4
 14.3
Total$298
 $288
 $282
 $10
 3.5 $6
 2.1
In 2017, production costs increased $10 million, or 3.5%, primarily due to a:
$6 million increase in purchased water principally due to usage increases in our California subsidiary,Company’s New York operations. After excluding the result of the lifting in April 2017 of California water usage restrictions that had been mandated in 2015 due to the state’s extreme drought;
$2 million increase in fuel and power largely attributable to higher system delivery of water and supplier price increases in our Missouri and California subsidiaries; and
$2 million increase in waste disposal mainly due to higher sludge removal costs in our Illinois and Missouri subsidiaries.
In 2016, production costs increased $6 million, or 2.1%, primarily due to a:
$5 million increase in purchased water principally due to price increases in our California subsidiary; and a
$4 million increase in waste disposal largely attributable to higher sludge removal costs in several of our subsidiaries; partially offset by a
$2 million decrease in fuel and power mainly due to a price decrease in ourCompany’s New Jersey subsidiary.
Employee-Related Costs
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Salaries and wages$334
 $336
 $321
 $(2) (0.6) $15
 4.7
Pensions32
 28
 30
 4
 14.3
 (2) (6.7)
Group insurance54
 58
 60
 (4) (6.9) (2) (3.3)
Other benefits26
 21
 19
 5
 23.8
 2
 10.5
Total$446
 $443
 $430
 $3
 0.7
 $13
 3.0
In 2017,York operations, for 2022, employee-related costs increased $3 million, or 0.7%, primarily dueremained consistent compared to a:
$4 million increase in pensions principally due to a lower discount rate in 2017, resulting in increased plan obligations; and a
$5 million increase in other benefits largely attributable to higher employer 401(k) savings plan contributions and2021. In 2022, the Regulated Businesses experienced an increase in training costs; partially offset by a
$4 million decrease in group insurance mainly due to lower medical claims experienced in 2017 and a decrease in other postretirement benefit plan costs resulting from plan amendments approved in 2016, offset in part by higher enrollment in 2017 and increases in group insurance rates.
In 2016, employee-related costs increased $13 million, or 3.0%, primarily due to a:
$15 million increase in salaries and wages principally due to merit increases and higher annual performance plan expense and an increase in compensation expense inheadcount to support of the growth, of the business,which was offset in part by an increase inhigher capitalized labor attributableand overhead rates, as well as lower pension service costs.
58

Production Costs
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(In millions) 
Purchased water$154 $153 $149 
Fuel and power104 97 88 
Chemicals78 59 57 
Waste disposal51 44 41 
Total$387 $353 $335 
Included in production costs for 2021, was $8 million related to higher capital investment; partially offset by a

$2the Company’s New York operations. Excluding the Company’s New York operations, for 2022, production costs increased $42 million, decrease in group insurance largely attributable to a $10 million decrease in other postretirement benefit plan costs resulting from plan amendments approved in 2016, offset in part by $9 million of higher medical claims experienced in 2016.
Operating Supplies and Services
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Contracted services$84
 $84
 $81
 $
 
 $3
 3.7
Office supplies and services49
 45
 44
 4
 8.9
 1
 2.3
Transportation14
 13
 16
 1
 7.7
 (3) (18.8)
Rents15
 14
 14
 1
 7.1
 
 
Other47
 56
 39
 (9) (16.1) 17
 43.6
Total$209
 $212
 $194
 $(3) (1.4) $18
 9.3
In 2017, operating supplies and services decreased $3 million, or 1.4%, primarily due to a:
$9 million decreaseinflationary pressures which resulted in other principally due to charges recorded in 2016, including a $5 million write-off of timekeeping system costs that were previously capitalizedincreased fuel, power and a $7 million judgment in litigation; partially offset by a
$4 million increase in office supplies and services largely attributable to higher employee relocation, telecommunication and office supplies expense.
In 2016, operating supplies and services increased $18 million, or 9.3%, primarily due to a:
$17 million increase in other principally due to a $5 million write-off of timekeeping system costs that were previously capitalized and a $7 million judgment in litigation, both recorded in 2016, and a $3 million adjustment recorded in 2015 to recognize previously expensed business transformation costs as a regulatory asset in our California subsidiary, resulting from a rate case decision.
Maintenance Materials and Supplies
In 2017, maintenance materials and supplies decreased $3 million, or 4.1%, primarily due to lower tank painting expense in our New Jersey subsidiary and the timing of maintenance activities.
In 2016, maintenance materials and supplies increased $3 million, or 4.3%, primarily due to a:
$10 million increase in tank painting expense in several of our subsidiaries; partially offset by a
$5 million decrease in main breaks driven by milder winter weather in 2016.chemical costs.
Customer Billing and Accounting
In 2017 and 2016,2022, as compared to 2021, customer billing and accounting decreased $3$7 million and $9 million, or 5.6% and 14.3%, respectively. The decrease in both years was primarily due to the sale of the Company’s New York operations and lower uncollectible customer uncollectible expense attributable to focused collection efforts.accounts expense.
Other
In 2017,2022, as compared to 2021, other operation and maintenance decreased $89increased $10 million or 84.0%, primarily due to a:increase to the insurance other than group reserve which had an unfavorable claims experience compared to prior year.
$65 million net charge recorded in 2016, resulting from the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginia,Depreciation and a $22 million benefit recorded in 2017, resulting from a related insurance settlement with one of our general liability insurance carriers; and
$5 million decrease in casualty insurance expense attributable to a lower claims experience.Amortization
In 2016, other operation and maintenance expenses increased $50 million, or 89.3%, primarily due2022, as compared to a:
$65 million charge recorded in 2016, resulting from the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginia; partially offset by a

$15 million decrease in casualty insurance expense attributable to a lower claims experience.
Operating Expenses, net.
In 2017, operating expenses, net decreased $71 million, or 3.8%, primarily due to a:
$85 million decrease in operation and maintenance expense as explained above; and a
$7 million gain recognized on a land sale in our Kentucky subsidiary; partially offset by a
$22 million increase in2021, depreciation and amortization expense attributable to additional utility plant placed in service; included in the 2017 expense amount was the impact of revised rates from a depreciation study approved by the ICC in our Illinois subsidiary, resulting in lower depreciation expense of $16 million.
In 2016, operating expenses, net increased $120$32 million or 6.9%, primarily due to a:
$81 million increase in operation and maintenance expense as explained above;
$30 million increase in depreciation and amortization expense attributable to additional utility plant placed in service from capital infrastructure investments and incremental depreciationacquisitions.
General Taxes
In 2022, as compared to 2021, general taxes decreased $37 million, primarily related to the sale of the Company’s New York operations.
Other Income (Expense)
In 2022, as compared to 2021, other expenses increased $25 million primarily due to higher interest expense as a result of an $800 million long-term debt issuance in May 2022 and amortization expense resulting from our acquisition of Keystonehigher interest rates on short-term debt due to macroeconomic market conditions.
Provision for Income Taxes
In 2022, as compared to 2021, the Regulated Businesses’ provision for income taxes increased $16 million. The Regulated Businesses’ effective income tax rate was 18.0% and 17.9% for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The increase was primarily due to the decrease in the third quarteramortization of 2015; and
$14 million increase in general taxes principallyEADIT due to incremental property and gross receipts taxes.the completion of stub period amortization, pursuant to regulatory orders. The amortization of EADIT is generally offset with reductions in revenue.
59
Market-Based Businesses

The followingOther
Presented in the table summarizes certain financialbelow is information for our Market-Based Businesses and the ensuing discussions provide explanations for the variance related to operating revenues:Other:
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions) 
  
  
 $ % $ %
Operating revenues$422
 $451
 $434
 $(29) (6.4) $17
 3.9
Operation and maintenance337
 372
 358
 (35) (9.4) 14
 3.9
Operating expenses, net360
 391
 370
 (31) (7.9) 21
 5.7
Net income attributable to common stockholders38
 39
 42
 (1) (2.6) (3) (7.1)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
(In millions)   
Operating revenues$287 $546 $522 
Operation and maintenance244 452 364 
Depreciation and amortization16 35 42 
Gain on sale of businesses19 748 
Income before income taxes(34)678 (8)
Provision for income taxes— 205 (2)
Net (loss) income attributable to common shareholders$(34)$474 $(6)
Operating Revenues
In 2017,2022, operating revenues decreased $29$259 million or 6.4%, primarily due to a:
$56the sale of HOS, which had operating revenues of $293 million decrease in our Military Services Group principally due to lower capital upgrades in 2017,2021. Excluding the Company’s HOS operations, for 2022, operating revenues increased $34 million, largely driven by reduced military base budgetsan increase in capital and O&M projects in MSG, primarily at Joint Base Lewis-McChord and the completionUnited States Military Academy at West Point, New York.
Operation and Maintenance
Presented in the table below is information regarding the main components of a large projectOther’s operating and maintenance expense:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
(In millions)   
Operating supplies and services$120 $191 $118 
Maintenance materials and supplies35 123 114 
Employee-related costs73 109 111 
Production costs10 
Other22 15 
Total$244 $452 $364 
Operating Supplies and Services
Included in mid-2016 at Fort Polk;operating supplies and a
$6services for 2021, was $39 million decrease in our Contract Operations Group largely attributablerelated to the completion of several contractsCompany’s HOS operations and a $45 million pre-tax contribution to the AWCF. Excluding the Company’s HOS operations and AWCF contribution, for 2022, operating supplies and services increased $13 million, primarily driven by costs associated with increased capital and O&M projects in 2017; partially offset by aMSG, as discussed above.
$18Maintenance Materials and Supplies
Included in maintenance materials and supplies for 2021, was $96 million increase in our Homeowner Services Group mainly duerelated to contract growth, as well as expansion into new geographic areasthe Company’s HOS operations. Excluding the Company’s HOS operations, for 2022, operating supplies and price increases for existing customers; and a
$16services increased $8 million, increase in Keystone primarily due to an increase in operations as a resultCSG costs related to contract with the City of market recovery in the natural gas industry.Camden, New Jersey.
Employee-Related Costs
In 2016, operating revenues increased $172022, as compared to 2021, employee-related costs decreased $36 million or 3.9%, primarily due to a:the sale of HOS.
$15Depreciation and Amortization
In 2022, as compared to 2021, depreciation and amortization decreased $19 million increase from Keystone, which was acquired inprimarily due to the thirdsale of HOS.
60

Gain on Sale of Businesses
During the fourth quarter of 2015;
$112021, the Company recognized a pre-tax gain of $748 million increase in our Homeowner Services Group mainly duerelating to contract growth, as well as expansion into new geographic areas and price increases for existing customers; and a
$11the sale of HOS. In 2022, the Company recorded post-closing adjustments, primarily related to working capital, of pre-tax income of $20 million, increase in our Contract Operations Group largely attributable to contract growth, specifically from our contract in Camden, New Jersey; partially offset by a
$21 million decrease in our Military Services Group principally due to lower capital upgrades in 2016, offset in part by incremental revenues fromwhich increased the addition of the Vandenberg Air Force Base contract in 2016.

Operation and Maintenance
The following table and ensuing discussions provide explanations for the variancestotal gain related to the major componentssale of operationHOS. See Note 5—Acquisitions and maintenance expense:Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
 For the Years Ended December 31, Increase
(Decrease)
 Increase
(Decrease)
 2017 2016 2015 2017 vs. 2016 2016 vs. 2015
(Dollars in millions)      $ % $ %
Production costs$37
 $35
 $36
 $2
 5.7
 $(1) (2.8)
Employee-related costs97
 94
 76
 3
 3.2
 18
 23.7
Operating supplies and services121
 165
 182
 (44) (26.7) (17) (9.3)
Maintenance materials and supplies67
 68
 57
 (1) (1.5) 11
 19.3
Other15
 10
 7
 5
 50.0
 3
 42.9
Total$337
 $372
 $358
 $(35) (9.4) $14
 3.9
Provision for Income Taxes
In 2017, operation and maintenance expense2022, as compared to 2021, provision for income taxes decreased $35$205 million or 9.4%, primarily due to a:the sale of HOS. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
$44
Tax Matters
On August 16, 2022, President Biden signed into law the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 (the “IRA”). The IRA contains a Corporate Alternative Minimum Tax (“CAMT”) provision, effective January 1, 2023. To determine if a company is considered an applicable corporation subject to CAMT, the company’s average adjusted financial statement income (“AFSI”) for the three consecutive years preceding the tax year must exceed $1 billion. An applicable corporation must make several adjustments to AFSI when determining CAMT under the new law. Initial guidance regarding the application of the CAMT was issued on December 27, 2022, and additional guidance is forthcoming. The Company is continuing to assess the impact of the initial guidance and will continue to monitor as additional guidance is released.
On July 8, 2022, Pennsylvania Governor Tom Wolf signed into law Act 53 of 2022, which reduces the Pennsylvania State Income Tax Rate in yearly increments starting January 1, 2023, with an initial rate of 8.99% and ending effective January 1, 2031, with a rate of 4.99%. Under Accounting Standards Codification Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”), the tax effects of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. ASC 740 also requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. As such, the Company’s accumulated deferred income tax (“ADIT”) balances for its Pennsylvania subsidiary were remeasured during the quarter ended September 30, 2022, to estimate the impacts of the recently enacted tax rate. The remeasurement reduced the ADIT liability by $159 million decreaseas of December 31, 2022 and created a corresponding regulatory liability since the EADIT is expected to be returned to customers in operating suppliesa future rate case. However, since the rate is declining in yearly increments, the total EADIT will be subject to change.
On September 27, 2022, Iowa’s Department of Revenue announced a reduction in the state’s top corporate rate from 9.8% to 8.4% effective January 1, 2023. As such, the Company’s ADIT balances for its Iowa subsidiary were remeasured during the quarter ended September 30, 2022, to estimate the impacts of the recently enacted tax rate. The remeasurement reduced the ADIT liability by $2 million as of December 31, 2022 and services principally duecreated a corresponding regulatory liability since the EADIT is expected to lower capital upgradesbe returned to customers in our Military Services Groupa future rate case.
Federal Net Operating Loss
The Company had no federal NOL carryover balance as of December 31, 2021.
Legislative Updates
During 2022, the Company’s regulatory jurisdictions enacted the following legislation that has been approved and is effective as of February 15, 2023:
Indiana passed Senate Enrolled Act 272, which requires public reporting of a non-jurisdictional utility’s asset management programs. Non-jurisdictional utilities are exempt from the jurisdiction of the Indiana Utility Regulatory Commission (the “IURC”). The legislation also creates a water and wastewater research and extension program at a state university to serve as a repository for data collected from utilities. Additionally, the legislation establishes oversight and a receivership program in 2017, as discussed above, as well as lower advertisingthe IURC for non-jurisdictional utilities with violations that create environmental or human health and marketing expensesafety issues. Legislation was signed by the Governor on March 7, 2022, and became effective on July 1, 2022.
Indiana passed water and wastewater utility asset financing legislation, Senate Enrolled Act 273, which authorizes the recovery of property tax in our Homeowners Services Group; partially offset by a
$3 million increaseDistribution System Improvement Charge filings. The legislation also permits the IURC to allow recovery through tracking mechanisms for changes in employee-relatedproperty tax and for costs largely attributable to higher headcountreferenda or action by elected or appointed individuals. Legislation was signed by the Governor on March 10, 2022, and became effective on July 1, 2022.
61

Virginia passed Senate Bill 500 and House Bill 182, which requires the Virginia State Corporation Commission, in Keystone dueany future ratemaking proceeding for an investor-owned water/wastewater utility, to an increaseevaluate the utility on a stand-alone basis and utilize the utility’s actual end-of-test period capital structure and cost of capital without regard to the cost of capital, capital structure, or investments of any other entities with which the utility may be affiliated. Legislation was signed by the Governor on April 11, 2022, and became effective on July 1, 2022.
Illinois passed House Bill 900/Public Act 102-0698, which contains appropriations to the Department of Commerce and Economic Opportunity of $3 million for the purposes of the Water and Sewer Finance Assistance Act (H.B. 414/Public Act 102-0262) and $55 million for the purposes of the federal Low-Income Household Water Assistance Program (LIHWAP). Legislation was signed by the Governor on April 19, 2022, with these provisions of the bill taking effect on July 1, 2022.
Tennessee passed Senate Bill 2282 and House Bill 2346, which requires all utilities to implement a cyber security plan and update it every two years to provide for the protection of the utility’s facilities from unauthorized use, alteration, ransom, or destruction of electronic data. The relevant regulatory body will verify if a utility has complied or impose reasonable sanctions if out of compliance. Utility compliance will be required by July 1, 2023. Legislation was signed by the Governor on June 1, 2022, and became effective immediately.
The Missouri General Assembly passed state and local property tax tracker legislation, Senate Bill 745, which requires a utility to defer to a regulatory asset or liability account any difference in operations as a result of market recoverywhat was actually paid in state or local property taxes and what was used to set the revenue requirement in the natural gas industry, offset in part in our Contract Operations Group as several contracts wereutility’s most recently completed in 2017;general rate case. Legislation was signed by the Governor on June 29, 2022, and abecame effective on August 28, 2022.
$5 million increase in other mainly dueCalifornia passed Senate Bill 1469, which allows the CPUC to an increase in customer uncollectible expense in our Homeowner Services Group asconsider and authorize the implementation of a result of contract growth in 2017.mechanism that separates the water corporation’s revenue and its water sales. Legislation was signed by the Governor on September 30, 2022 and became effective on January 1, 2023.
In 2016, operation and maintenance expense increased $14 million, or 3.9%, primarily due to a:
$11 million increase from Keystone, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2015, including $8 million in employee-related costs and $1 million each in production costs, operating supplies and services, and an;
$11 million increase in maintenance materials and supplies largely attributable to contract growth in our Homeowner Services and Contract Operations Groups, and higher claims, marketing expenses and costs associated with our investment in a new customer information system in our Homeowner Services Group; and a
$10 million increase in employee-related costs principally due to the addition of the Vandenberg Air Force Base contract in 2016, and increased headcount resulting from contract growth in our Homeowner Services and Contract Operations Groups; partially offset by a
$18 million decrease in operating supplies and services mainly due to lower capital upgrades in our Military Services Group, as discussed above.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We regularly evaluate and monitor our cash requirements for capital investments, acquisitions, operations, commitments, debt maturities, interest and dividends. Our business is capital intensive, with a majority of this capital funded by cash flows from operations. When necessary, we also obtain funds from external sources, primarily in the debt markets and through short-term commercial paper borrowings. We also have access to equity capital markets, if needed. Our access to external financing on reasonable terms depends on our credit ratings and current business conditions, including that of the utility and water utility industries in general, as well as conditions in the debt or equity capital markets, and the national and international economic and geopolitical arenas. If these business, market, financial and other conditions deteriorate to the extent that we no longer are able to access the capital markets on reasonable terms, we have access to an unsecured revolving credit facility with aggregate bank commitments of $1.75 billion, with an expiration date of June 2020 (subject to extension by us for up to two one-year periods). We rely on this revolving credit facility and the capital markets to fulfill our short-term liquidity needs, to issue letters of credit and to support our $1.6 billion commercial paper program. Disruptions in the credit markets may discourage lenders from extending the terms of such commitments or agreeing to new commitments. Market disruptions may also limit our ability to issue debt and equity securities in the capital markets. See “Credit Facilities and Short-Term Debt” for further discussion.

In order to meet our short-term liquidity needs, we, through AWCC, our wholly owned financing subsidiary, issue commercial paper, which is supported by the revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2017, AWCC had no outstanding borrowings and $84 million of outstanding letters of credit underThe Company uses its revolving credit facility, with $1.75 billion available to fulfill our short-term liquidity needs and to issue letters of credit, which supported $905 million in outstanding commercial paper. We believe that our ability to access the capital markets, our revolving credit facility and our cash flows from operations will generate sufficient cash to fund our short-term requirements. We have no plans to issue equity under normal operating conditions in the foreseeable future with the limited exception of privately or investor-owned acquisitions whose sellers require equity as necessary to complete the acquisition. We believe we have sufficient liquidity and the ability to manage our expenditures, should there be a disruption of the capital and credit markets. However, we can provide no assurances that the lenders will meet their existing commitments to AWCC under the revolving credit facility or that we will be able to access the commercial paper or loan markets in the future on terms acceptable to us or at all.
In addition, our regulated subsidiaries receive advances and contributions from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas. Advances for construction are refundable for limited periods, which vary according to state regulations, as new customers begin to receive service or other contractual obligations are fulfilled. Amounts which are no longer refundable are reclassified to contributions in aid of construction. Utility plant funded by advances and contributions is excluded from our Regulated Businesses rate base. Generally, we depreciate contributed property and amortize contributions in aid of construction at the composite rate of the related property. Some of our subsidiaries do not depreciate contributed property, based upon regulatory guidelines. The taxability of advances and contributions in aid of construction was changed with the enactment of the TCJA. Previously, the majority of advances and contributions that we collected were not taxable however, with the enactment of the TCJA, they will be taxable going forward. Regulatory treatment for advances and contributions under the TCJA has not yet been defined and we are working with our regulatory jurisdictions to determine impacts to the Company and our customers.
We use our capital resources, including cash, primarily to:to (i) fund operating and capital requirements;requirements, (ii) pay interest and meet debt maturities;maturities, (iii) pay dividends;dividends, (iv) fund acquisitions; andacquisitions, (v) fund pension and postretirement benefit obligations. We investobligations, and (vi) to pay federal income taxes. The Company invests a significant amount of cash on regulated capital projects where we expectit expects to earn a long-term return on investment. Additionally, we operatethe Company operates in rate regulated environments in which the amount of new investment recovery may be limited, and where such recovery generally takes place over an extended period of time, and certain capital recovery is also subject to regulatory lag. See Item 1—Business—Regulated Businesses—Economic Regulation and Rate Making. We expect for additional information. The Company expects to fund future maturities of long-term debt through a combination of external debt and, to the extent available, cash flows from operations. Since we expect ourthe Company expects its capital investments over the next few years to be greater than ourits cash flows from operating activities, we have nothe Company currently plans to reducefund the excess of its capital investments over its cash flows from operating activities for the next five years through a combination of long-term debt significantly.and equity in addition to the remaining proceeds from the sale of HOS. The remaining proceeds from the sale of HOS include receipt of a seller promissory note, plus interest, and a contingent cash payment payable upon satisfaction of certain conditions on or before December 31, 2023. If necessary, wethe Company may delay certain capital investments or other funding requirements or pursue financing from other sources to preserve liquidity. In this event, we believe wethe Company believes it can rely upon cash flows from operations to meet ourits obligations and fund ourits minimum required capital investments for an extended period of time.
WithThe Company regularly evaluates and monitors its cash requirements for capital investments, acquisitions, operations, commitments, debt maturities, interest and dividends. The Company’s business is capital intensive, with a majority of this capital funded by cash flows from operations. The Company also obtains funds from external sources, primarily in the enactmentdebt markets and through short-term commercial paper borrowings, and may also access the equity capital markets as needed or desired to support capital funding requirements. In order to meet short-term liquidity needs, American Water Capital Corp. (“AWCC”), the wholly owned finance subsidiary of parent company, issues commercial paper that is supported by its revolving credit facility. The Company’s access to external financing on reasonable terms may depend on, as appropriate, any or all of the TCJAfollowing: current business conditions, including that of the utility and water utility industry in general; conditions in the debt or equity capital markets; the Company’s credit ratings; and conditions in the national and international economic and geopolitical arenas. Disruptions in the credit markets may discourage lenders from extending the terms of such commitments or agreeing to new commitments. Market disruptions may also limit the Company’s ability to issue debt and equity securities in the capital markets.
62

If these unfavorable business, market, financial and other conditions deteriorate to the extent that the Company is no longer able to access the commercial paper and/or capital markets on reasonable terms, AWCC has access to an unsecured revolving credit facility. AWCC’s revolving credit facility is used principally to support its commercial paper program, to provide additional liquidity support, and to provide a sublimit for the issuance of up to $150 million in letters of credit. On October 26, 2022, AWCC and certain lenders amended and restated the credit agreement with respect to the revolving credit facility to, among other things, increase the maximum commitments under the facility from $2.25 billion to $2.75 billion and to extend the expiration date of the facility from March 2025 to October 2027. Subject to satisfying certain conditions, the credit agreement also permits AWCC to increase the maximum commitment under the facility by up to an aggregate of $500 million and to request extensions of its expiration date for up to two one-year periods. Also, effective October 26, 2022, the maximum aggregate principal amount of short-term borrowings authorized under AWCC’s commercial paper program was increased from $2.10 billion to $2.60 billion. As of December 31, 2022, AWCC had no outstanding borrowings and $78 million of outstanding letters of credit under its revolving credit facility, with $1.50 billion available to fulfill its short-term liquidity needs and to issue letters of credit.
The Company believes that its ability to access the debt and equity capital markets, the revolving credit facility and cash flows from operations will generate sufficient cash to fund the Company’s short-term requirements. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity and the reductionability to manage its expenditures, should there be a disruption of the U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35%capital and credit markets. However, there can be no assurance that the lenders will be able to 21%, we anticipate a decreasemeet existing commitments to AWCC under the revolving credit facility, or that AWCC will be able to access the commercial paper or loan markets in the future revenue authorizations associated with our Regulated Businesses, initially leading to lower cash flows. We expect this cash flow impact to decline over time, as our Regulated Businesses’ rate base grows, the result of lower deferred income tax liabilities, which offset rate base. The lower deferred income tax liabilities are mainly due to: (i) a lower U.S. federal corporate income tax rate; (ii) the normalization (refunding to customers) of the re-measured deferred income tax liabilities over the remaining life of the associated assets; and (iii) the loss of future bonus depreciation deductions on capital projects that began after September 27, 2017.acceptable terms or at all.
Cash Flows Provided byfrom Operating Activities
Cash flows provided byfrom operating activities primarily result from the sale of water and wastewater services and, due to the seasonality of demand, are generally greater during the warmer months. OurThe Company’s future cash flows provided byfrom operating activities will be affected by, among other things: customers’ ability to pay for service in a timely manner, economic utility regulation; inflation;regulation, inflation, compliance with environmental, health and safety standards;standards, production costs;costs, maintenance costs, customer growth;growth, declining customer usage of water;water, employee-related costs, including pension funding;funding, weather and seasonality; taxes;seasonality, taxes, and overall economic conditions.
We expect that the enactment of the TCJA to be accretive to our consolidated earnings over time through: (i) growth in rate base for the same level of expected capital expenditures due to the impact of the lower U.S. federal corporate income tax rate and the re-measurement of our deferred income tax assets and liabilities; (ii) increased earnings in our Market-Based Businesses due to the lower U.S. federal corporate income tax rate; all partially offset by (iii) the impact of increased debt due to lower cash flows from operations. We believe that we will likely begin paying federal income taxes towards the end of 2019, when we expect our federal NOL carryforwards balance will be fully benefited or used, and expect to be a full cash taxpayer by 2020, although this timing could be impacted by any significant changes in our future results of operations and the outcome of regulatory proceedings regarding the TCJA.


Cash flows provided by operating activities have been a reliable, steady source of funding, sufficient to meet operating requirements, make our dividend payments and fund a portion of our capital expenditure requirements. We expect to seek access to debt capital markets to meet the balance of our capital expenditure requirements as needed. We also have access to equity capital markets, if needed. Operating cash flows can be negatively affected by changes in ourthe Company’s rate regulated environments, or changes in ourthe economy, interest rates, the timing of tax payments, and the Company’s customers’ economic outlook and ability to pay for service in a timely manner. As such, our working capital needs are primarily limited to funding increases in customer accounts receivable and unbilled revenues, mainly associated with revenue increases in our Regulated Businesses. Wemanner, among other items. The Company can provide no assurance that ourits customers’ historical payment pattern will continue in the future. Sometimes ourThe Company’s current liabilities may exceed current assets because of ourmainly from debt maturities due within one year and the periodic use of short-term debt as a funding source, primarily to meet scheduled maturities of long-term debt, fund acquisitions and construction projects, as well as cash needs, which can fluctuate significantly due to the seasonality of the business stage of our acquisitions and construction projects. We addressother factors. The Company addresses cash timing differences primarily through the aforementionedits short-term liquidity funding mechanisms.
The followingPresented in the table providesbelow is a summary of the major items affecting ourthe Company’s cash flows provided byfrom operating activities:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Net income$820 $1,263 $709 
Add (less):   
Depreciation and amortization649 636 604 
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits (c)
80 230 207 
Other non-cash activities (a)
(16)(27)— 
Changes in working capital (b)
(355)126 (55)
Pension and non-pension postretirement benefit contributions(51)(40)(39)
(Gain) or loss on sale of businesses(19)(747)— 
Net cash provided by operating activities$1,108 $1,441 $1,426 
(a)Includes provision for losses on accounts receivable, pension and non-pension postretirement benefits and other non-cash, net. Details of each component can be found on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
(b)Changes in working capital include changes to receivables and unbilled revenues, income tax receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, accrued taxes and other current assets and liabilities, net.
(c)The decrease in the 2022 deferred tax activity is primarily due to the settlement of the deferred tax liability related to New York American Water, sold in January 2022.
63

 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Net income$426
 $468
 $476
Add (less):     
Depreciation and amortization492
 470
 440
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits462
 295
 312
Other non-cash activities (a)
16
 35
 37
Impact of Freedom Industries settlement activities(22) 65
 
Changes in working capital (b)
123
 9
 (13)
Pension and postretirement benefit contributions(48) (53) (57)
Net cash flows provided by operating activities$1,449
 $1,289
 $1,195
(a)Includes provision for losses on accounts receivable, gain on asset dispositions and purchases, pension and non-pension postretirement benefits and other non-cash, net. Details of each component can be found in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
(b)Changes in working capital include changes to receivables and unbilled revenues, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, and other current assets and liabilities, net.
In 2017,2022, cash flows provided by operating activities increased $160decreased $333 million. The changes were driven by $338 million of estimated tax payments primarily due to an increase in net income after non-cash adjustments, includingfor taxable gains on the impactsales of the enactment of the TCJA,Company’s HOS business and an increase in cash flows from working capital. The main factors contributing to the net income increase are described in the “Consolidated Results of Operations” section and include higher operating revenues, partially offset by higher income taxes due to a $125 million re-measurement charge resulting from the impact of the change in the federal tax rate on the Company’s deferred income taxes from the enactment of the TCJA. The increase in non-cash activities was mainly attributable to the increase in deferred income taxes, as mentioned above, and an increase in depreciation and amortization due to additional utility plant placed in service. The change in working capital was principally due to: (i) the timing of accounts payable and accrued liabilities, including the accrual recorded during 2016 for the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginia; (ii) a decrease in unbilled revenues as a result of our Military Services Group achieving significant capital project milestones during 2016; and (iii) a change in other current assets and liabilities, including the decrease in other current assets associated with the termination of our four forward starting swap agreements and timing of payments clearing our cash accounts.
In 2016, cash flows provided byits New York regulated operations, increased $94 million, primarily due to an increase in net income after non-cash adjustments, including the impact of the binding global agreement in principle to settle claims associated with the Freedom Industries chemical spill in West Virginia, and an increase in cash flows from working capital. The main factors contributing to the net income increase are described in the “Consolidated Results of Operations” section and include higher operating revenues, partially offset by higher O&M expenses. The increase in non-cash activities was mainly attributable to an increase in depreciation and amortization due to additional utility plant placed in service. The change in working capital was principally due to: (i) a change in accounts receivable and unbilled revenues resulting from continuous improvement in our Regulated Businesses’ collection efforts, as well as the contribution of $45 million to the American Water Charitable Foundation. Partially offsetting these changes was a decrease in unbilled revenues in our Military Services Group attributable to lower capital upgrades in 2016 as compareddue to the same periodgain recognized from the sale of HOS in 2015; (ii) the timing of accounts payable and accrued liabilities; and (iii) a change in other current assets and liabilities.2021.
The Company expects to make pension and postretirement contributions to the plan trusts up to $45of $39 million in 2018. In addition, we estimate that contributions will amount to $47 million, $47 million, $51 million and $58 million in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively.2023. Actual amounts contributed could change materially from these estimatesthis estimate as a result of changes in assumptions and actual investment returns, among other factors.

Cash Flows Used infrom Investing Activities
The followingPresented in the table providesbelow is a summary of the major items affection ouraffecting the Company’s cash flows used infrom investing activities:
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015
Capital expenditures$(1,434) $(1,311) $(1,160)
Acquisitions(177) (204) (197)
Other investing activities, net (a)
(61) (75) (102)
Net cash flows used in investing activities$(1,672) $(1,590) $(1,459)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)202220212020
Capital expenditures$(2,297)$(1,764)$(1,822)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(315)(135)(135)
Proceeds from sale of assets, net of cash on hand608 472 
Removal costs from property, plant and equipment retirements, net(123)(109)(106)
Net cash used in investing activities$(2,127)$(1,536)$(2,061)
(a)Includes removal costs from property, plant and equipment retirements and proceeds from sale of assets and securities.
In 2017 and 2016,2022, cash flows used in investing activities increased $591 million primarily due to an increase in our regulatedincreased payments for capital expenditures principallyand acquisitions partially offset by proceeds of $608 million received from incremental investments associated with the sale of the Company’s New York operations. The Company continues to invest across all infrastructure categories, mainly replacement and renewal of our transmission and distribution and services, meter and fire hydrants infrastructure in ourthe Company’s Regulated Businesses.Businesses, as discussed below.
OurThe Company’s infrastructure investment plan consists of both infrastructure renewal programs, where we replace infrastructure,the Company replaces mains, services, meters, hydrants and valves, as needed, and major capital investment projects, where we constructthe Company constructs new water and wastewater treatment and delivery facilities to meet new customer growth and water quality regulations. OurThe Company’s projected capital expenditures and other investments are subject to periodic review and revision to reflect changes in economic conditions and other factors.
The followingPresented in the table providesbelow is a summary of our historicalthe Company’s capital expenditures related to the upgrading of our infrastructure and systems:by category:
For the Years Ended December 31, For the Years Ended December 31,
(In millions)2017 2016 2015(In millions)202220212020
Transmission and distribution$551
 $568
 $527
Transmission and distribution$901 $749 $704 
Treatment and pumping171
 151
 136
Treatment and pumping190 197 306 
Services, meter and fire hydrants281
 297
 214
Services, meter and fire hydrants546 366 333 
General structure and equipment281
 202
 174
General structure and equipment380 251 299 
Sources of supply54
 59
 53
Sources of supply95 64 54 
Wastewater96
 34
 56
Wastewater185 137 126 
Total capital expenditures$1,434
 $1,311
 $1,160
Total capital expenditures$2,297 $1,764 $1,822 
In 2017, our2022, the Company’s capital expenditures increased $123$533 million or 9.4%, primarily due to investment in our general structure and equipment and wastewater categories. In 2016, our capital expenditures increased $151 million, or 13.0%, principally due to investmentan increase across the majority of ourmost infrastructure categories.
WeThe Company also grow ourgrows its business primarily through acquisitions of water and wastewater systems, as well as other water-related services.systems. These acquisitions are complementarygenerally located in geographic proximity to ourthe Company’s existing businessRegulated Businesses and support continued geographical diversification and growth of ourits operations. Generally, acquisitions are funded initially with short-term debt, and later refinanced with long-term financing. During 2022, the proceeds from long-term debt.
The following provides a summary of the acquisitions and dispositions affecting our cash flows from investing activities:
2017:
The majority of cashCompany paid for acquisitions pertained to the $159 million purchase of the McKeesport system, excluding a $5 million non-escrowed deposit made in 2016.
Paid $18 million for 16 water and wastewater systems, excluding the McKeesport system and Shorelands (a stock transaction), representing approximately 7,000 customers.
Received $15$315 million for the saleacquisition of assets and securities.
2016:
Paid $199 million for 1526 water and wastewater systems, representing in the aggregate approximately 42,00070,000 customers.
Made a non-escrowed deposit of $5 million related to the McKeesport system acquisition.

Received $9 million for the sale of assets and securities.
2015:
Paid $133 million for the acquisition of our 95% interest in Water Solutions Holdings, LLC, the parent company of Keystone.
Paid $64 million for 14 water and wastewater systems, representing approximately 24,000 customers.
Received $5 million for the sale of assets and securities.
As previously noted, we expectover the next five years the Company expects to invest between $8.0$14 billion to $8.6$15 billion, from 2018 to 2022, with $7.2 billion of this range for infrastructure improvements in our Regulated Businesses. In 2018, we expect to invest between $1.6$12.5 billion to $1.8 billion, with a range of $1.4 billion to $1.5$13 billion for infrastructure improvements in ourthe Regulated Businesses. Also in 2018, we expectBusinesses, and the Company expects to invest between $120 million$30 billion to $240$34 billion over the next 10 years. In 2023, the Company expects to invest $2.9 billion, consisting of $2.5 billion for infrastructure improvements and $400 million for acquisitions in ourthe Regulated Businesses, and approximately $100 million for strategic growth opportunities, including the constructionBusinesses.
64

Cash Flows from Financing Activities
OurPresented in the table below is a summary of the major items affecting the Company’s cash flows from financing activities:
For the Years Ended December 31,
202220212020
(In millions)
Proceeds from long-term debt$822 $1,118 $1,334 
Repayments of long-term debt(15)(372)(342)
(Repayments of) proceeds from term loan— (500)500 
Net short-term borrowings (repayments) with maturities less than three months591 (198)(5)
Dividends paid(467)(428)(389)
Other financing activities, net (a)
69 35 22 
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities$1,000 $(345)$1,120 
(a)Includes proceeds from issuances of common stock under various employee stock plans and the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan, net of taxes paid, advances and contributions in aid of construction, net of refunds, and debt issuance costs and make-whole premiums on early debt redemption.
In 2022, cash flows provided by financing activities increased $1,345 million, primarily due to an increase in commercial paper borrowings, the repayment in full at maturity of the $500 million term loan in 2021 and repayments of long-term debt due to the prepayment of $327 million in aggregate principal amount of AWCC’s outstanding senior notes in 2021, with no comparable repayments in 2022. These changes were partially offset by lower proceeds from long-term debt.
The Company’s financing activities are primarily focused on funding regulated infrastructure construction expenditures, includeregulated acquisitions and payment of dividends. These activities included the issuance of long-term and short-term debt, primarily through AWCC. In addition, new infrastructure may be funded with customer advances and contributions in aid of construction, net of refunds, which amounted to $28 million, $16 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Based on the needs of ourthe Regulated Businesses and the Company, AWCC may borrow funds or issue its debt in the capital markets and then, through intercompany loans, provide those borrowings to the Regulated Businesses and the parent company. The Regulated Businesses and the parent company are obligated to pay their portion of the respective principal and interest to AWCC, in the amount necessary to enable AWCC to meet its debt service obligations. The parentParent company’s borrowings are not a source of capital for the Regulated Businesses, therefore, the parent company is not able to recover the interest charges on its debt through regulated water and wastewater rates. As of December 31, 2017, AWCC has made long-term fixed rate loans and commercial paper loans to our Regulated Businesses amounting to $3.9 billion and $586 million, respectively. Additionally, as of December 31, 2017,2022, AWCC has made long-term fixed rate loans and commercial paper loans to the Regulated Businesses amounting to $7.6 billion. Additionally, as of December 31, 2022, AWCC has made long-term fixed rate loans and commercial paper loans to parent company amounting $1.6 billion and $319 million, respectively.to $3.6 billion.
On August 10, 2017,May 5, 2022, AWCC completed a $1.35 billion debt offering which included the sale of $600issued $800 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.95% Senior Notes4.45% senior notes due 2027, and $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.75% Senior Notes due in 2047.2032. At the closing, of the offering, AWCC received, after deduction of underwriting discounts and debt issuance costs, $1.33 billion. On September 13, 2017,before deduction of offering expenses, net proceeds of approximately $792 million. AWCC used proceeds from the offering to prepay $138 million of its outstanding 5.62% Series C Senior Notes due December 21, 2018 (“Series C Senior Notes”) and $181 million of its outstanding 5.77% Series D Senior Notes due December 21, 2021 (“Series D Senior Notes”). AWCC also used thenet proceeds of this offeringthe offering: (i) to lend funds to parent company and its regulated subsidiaries; (ii) to repay AWCC’s commercial paper obligationsobligations; and (iii) for general corporate purposes, and subsequently, on October 15, 2017, to repay at maturity, $524 million of its 6.085% Senior Notes.
As a result of AWCC’s prepayment of the Series C Senior Notes and the Series D Senior Notes, and payment of a make-whole premium amount to the holders thereof of $34 million, we recorded a $6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company. Substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the Regulated Businesses were recorded as regulatory assets for we believe they are probable of recovery in future rates. Approximately $1 million of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the Regulated Businesses were amortized in 2017.purposes.
One of the principal market risks to which the Company is exposed is changes in interest rates. In order to manage the exposure, we followthe Company follows risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative contracts such as swaps. We reducetreasury lock agreements. The Company also reduces exposure to interest rates by managing commercial paper and debt maturities. We doThe Company does not enter into derivative contracts (through AWCC) for speculative purposes and dodoes not use leveraged instruments. The derivative contracts entered into are for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures. The Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to meet their contractual obligations. We minimizeThe Company minimizes the counterparty credit risk on these transactions by dealing only dealing with leading, credit-worthycreditworthy financial institutions, having long-term credit ratings of “A” or better.
On August 7, 2017, coinciding with AWCC’s $1.35 billion debt offering, we terminated four existing forward starting swapIn April 2022, the Company entered into several 10-year treasury lock agreements, with notional amounts totaling $400 million, and an aggregate notional amountaverage fixed interest rate of $300 million,2.89%. The Company designated these treasury lock agreements as cash flow hedges, with their fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss. In May 2022, the Company terminated the treasury lock agreements, realizing a net gain of $19approximately $4 million, to be amortized through interest, net over 30 years. On February 8, 2017,a 10-year period, in accordance with the tenor of the debt issuance on May 5, 2022.
65

In November and December 11, 2017, we2022, the Company entered into forward starting swapfour 10-year treasury lock agreements, each with notional amounts oftotaling $100 million, to reduce interest rate exposure on debt expected to be issued in 2018.2023. These forward starting swaptreasury lock agreements terminate in November 2018,January 2024, and have an average fixed rate of 2.59%3.56%. WeIn January 2023, the Company entered into three additional 10-year treasury lock agreements, with notional amounts totaling $100 million, to reduce interest rate exposure on debt expected to be issued in 2023. These treasury lock agreements terminate in January 2024, and have an average fixed rate of 3.35%. The Company designated these forward starting swaptreasury lock agreements as cash flow hedges, with their fair valuesvalue recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss. Upon termination, the cumulative gain or loss recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss will be amortized through interest, net over the term of the new debt.

In October 2017, we terminated our interest-rate swap to hedge $100 million of its 6.085% Senior Notes maturing in the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company paid variable interest of six-month LIBOR plus 3.422%, and had designated this interest rate swap as a fair value hedge, accounted for at fair value with gains or losses, as well as the offsetting gains or lossesNo ineffectiveness was recognized on the hedged item, recognized in interest, net. The net gain and loss recognized by the Company was de minimishedging instruments for the periodsyears ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.2022, 2021 or 2020.
In May 2015, theFebruary 2021, parent company and AWCC filed with the SEC a universal shelf registration statement that enables usthe Company to meet ourits capital needs through the offer and sale to the public from time to time of an unlimited amount of various types of securities, including American Water common stock, preferred stock, and other equity and hybrid securities, and AWCC debt securities, all subject to market conditions and demand, general economic conditions, and as applicable, rating status. The shelf registration statement will expire in May 2018.February 2024. During 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015, $1.352020, $800 million, $1.10 billion, $550 million and $550 million,$1.00 billion, respectively, of debt securities were issued pursuant tounder this and predecessor registration statements.
The followingPresented in the table detailsbelow are the issuances of long-term debt in 2017:2022:
CompanyTypeRateWeighted Average RateMaturityAmount
(in millions)
AWCC (a)
Senior notes—fixed rate4.45%4.45%2032$800 
Other American Water subsidiariesPrivate activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate0.00%-1.75%1.03%2027-204222 
Total issuances   $822 
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
(In millions)
AWCC Senior notes—fixed rate 2.95%-3.75% 2027-2047 $1,350
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 0.00%-1.44% 2020-2037 31
Other American Water subsidiaries Mortgage bonds—fixed rate 3.92% 2020 $3
Other American Water subsidiaries Term loan 4.62%-5.12% 2021 $11
Total issuances       $1,395
(a)This indebtedness is considered “debt” for purposes of a support agreement between parent company and AWCC, which serves as a functional equivalent of a full and unconditional guarantee by parent company of AWCC’s payment obligations under such indebtedness. See “—Issuer and Guarantor of Senior Notes” below.
The followingPresented in the table detailsbelow are the retirements and redemptions of long-term debt that was retiredin 2022 through sinking fund provisions, optional redemption or payment at maturity during 2017:maturity:
CompanyTypeRateWeighted Average RateMaturityAmount
(in millions)
AWCCPrivate activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate1.79%-2.31%2.24%2024-2031$
Other American Water subsidiariesPrivate activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate0.00%-5.50%1.50%2022-205113 
Other American Water subsidiariesMandatorily redeemable preferred stock8.49%8.49%2022
Total retirements and redemptions   $15 
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
(In millions)
AWCC Senior notes—fixed rate 5.62%-6.09% 2017-2021 $844
AWCC Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.79%-2.90% 2021-2031 1
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 0.00%-5.38% 2017-2041 15
Other American Water subsidiaries Mortgage bonds—fixed rate 7.08% 2017 33
Other American Water subsidiaries Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock 8.49%-9.18% 2031-2036 2
Other American Water subsidiaries Term loan 4.31%-5.31% 2021 1
Total retirements and redemptions       $896
The following table details the issuances of long-term debt in 2016:
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
(In millions)
AWCC (a)
 Senior notes—fixed rate 3.00%-4.00% 2026-2046 $550
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.00%-1.36% 2026-2037 3
Total issuances       $553
(a)On November 17, 2016, AWCC completed an offering of its senior fixed rate notes. Proceeds from this offering were used to lend funds to the Company and its Regulated Businesses, to repay commercial paper borrowings and for general corporate purposes.

The following table details the long-term debt that was retired through sinking fund provisions, optional redemption or payment at maturity during 2016:
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
(In millions)
AWCC Senior notes—fixed rate 5.52% 2016 $37
AWCC Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.79%-2.90% 2021-2031 1
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 0.00%-5.30% 2016-2041 104
Other American Water subsidiaries Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock 8.49%-9.18% 2031-2036 2
Total retirements and redemptions       $144
The following table details the issuances of long-term debt in 2015:
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
(In millions)
AWCC (a)
 Senior notes—fixed rate 3.40%-4.30% 2025-2045 $550
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.00%-1.56% 2032 15
Total issuances       $565
(a)On August 13, 2015, AWCC completed an offering of its senior fixed rate notes. Proceeds from this offering were used to lend funds to the Company and its Regulated Businesses, to repay commercial paper borrowings and to finance redemptions of long-term debt.
The following table details the long-term debt that was retired through sinking fund provisions, optional redemption or payment at maturity during 2015:
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
(In millions)
AWCC Senior notes—fixed rate 6.00% 2015 30
AWCC Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.79%-5.25% 2015-2031 $36
Other American Water subsidiaries (a)
 Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 0.00%-5.40% 2015-2041 61
Other American Water subsidiaries Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock 8.49%-9.18% 2031-2036 4
Total retirements and redemptions       $131
(a)Includes $2 million of non-cash redemptions resulting from the use of restricted funds.
From time to time and as market conditions warrant, wethe Company may engage in long-term debt retirements through make-whole redemptions, tender offers, open market repurchases or other viable alternativesalternatives.
66

Issuer and Guarantor of Senior Notes
The outstanding senior notes issued by AWCC have been issued under two indentures, each by and between AWCC and Computershare Trust Company, N.A., as successor to strengthen our balance sheets.Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee, providing for the rights and obligations of the parties thereto and the holders of the notes issued thereunder. The senior notes also have been issued with the benefit of a support agreement, as amended, between parent company and AWCC, which serves as the functional equivalent of a full and unconditional guarantee by parent company of AWCC’s payment obligations under the senior notes. No other subsidiary of parent company provides guarantees for any of the outstanding senior notes. If AWCC is unable to make timely payment of any interest, principal or premium, if any, on such senior notes, parent company will provide to AWCC, at its request or the request of any holder of such senior notes, funds to make such payment in full. If AWCC fails or refuses to take timely action to enforce certain rights under the support agreement or if AWCC defaults in the timely payment of any amounts owed to any holder of such senior notes, when due, the support agreement provides that the holder may proceed directly against parent company to enforce such rights or to obtain payment of the defaulted amounts owed to that holder.
In February 2015, our BoardAs a wholly owned finance subsidiary of Directors authorized an anti-dilutive, common stock repurchase program to mitigate the effectparent company, AWCC has no significant assets other than obligations of shares issued through our dividend reinvestment, employee stock purchaseparent company and executive compensation activities. The program allows the Company to purchase up to 10 million sharescertain of its outstanding common stock, over an unrestricted periodsubsidiaries in its Regulated Businesses segment to repay certain intercompany loans made to them by AWCC. AWCC’s ability to make payments of time,amounts owed to holders of the senior notes will be dependent upon AWCC’s receipt of sufficient payments of amounts owed pursuant to the terms of such intercompany loans and from its ability to issue indebtedness or otherwise obtain loans in the open market or through privately negotiated transactions. The program is conducted in accordance with Rule 10b-18future, the proceeds of which would be used to fund the repayment of the Exchange Act,senior notes.
Because parent company is a holding company and substantially all of its operations are conducted through its subsidiaries other than AWCC, parent company’s ability to facilitatefulfill its obligations under the repurchases, wesupport agreement will be dependent upon its receipt of sufficient cash dividends or distributions from its operating subsidiaries. See Note 9—Shareholders’ Equity—Dividends and Distributions, in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for a summary of the limitations on parent company and its subsidiaries to pay dividends or make distributions. Furthermore, parent company’s operating subsidiaries are separate and distinct legal entities and, other than AWCC, have also entered into Rule 10b5-1 share repurchase plansno obligation to make any payments on the senior notes or to make available or provide any funds for such payment, other than through their repayment obligations under intercompany loans, if any, with a third-party broker, which allows usAWCC. Based on the foregoing, parent company’s obligations under the support agreement will be effectively subordinated to repurchase shares at times when we may otherwise be prevented from doing so under insider trading lawsall indebtedness and other liabilities, including trade payables, lease commitments and moneys borrowed or because of self-imposed trading blackout periods. Subject to applicable regulations, we may elect to amendother indebtedness incurred or cancel this repurchase program or the share repurchase parameters at our discretion. As of December 31, 2017, we have repurchased an aggregate of 3,950,000 shares of common stock under this program.issued by parent company’s subsidiaries other than AWCC.

Credit Facilities and Short-Term Debt
We have an unsecured revolving credit facility of $1.75 billion that expires in June 2020. In March 2016, and under the terms of the revolving credit agreement dated June 30, 2015, AWCC exercised its right to increase its borrowing capacity available under our revolving credit facility from the aggregate maximum of $1.25 billion, to $1.75 billion. All other terms, conditions and covenants with respect to the existing facility remained unchanged. On June 30, 2015, AWCC and its lenders extended the termination date of the revolving credit facility from October 2018, to June 2020. This amended and restated agreement also allowed AWCC to request to extend further the term of the credit facility for up to two one-year periods. An extension request must satisfy certain conditions and receive approval of the lenders, as set forth in the revolving credit agreement.
Interest rates on advances under the Company’s revolving credit facility are based on a credit spread to the EurodollarSecured Overnight Financing Rate (“SOFR”) rate (or applicable market replacement rate) or base rate, each determined in accordance with AWCC’s then-applicable Moody Investors Service or Standard & Poor’s Ratings ServicesService’s and S&P Global Ratings’ then applicable credit rating. At current ratings, that spread would be 0.90%.rating on AWCC’s senior unsecured, non-credit enhanced debt. The facility is used principally to support AWCC’s commercial paper program and to provide up to $150 million in letters of credit. Indebtedness under the facility isand AWCC’s commercial paper are considered “debt” for purposes of a support agreement between the Companyparent company and AWCC, which serves as a functional equivalent of a full and unconditional guarantee by the Companyparent company of AWCC’s payment obligations underthereunder.
Presented in the tables below are the aggregate credit facility.
AWCC also has an outstandingfacility commitments, commercial paper program that is backed bylimit and letter of credit availability under the revolving credit facility, the maximum aggregate outstanding amount of which was increased on March 22, 2016, from $1.0 billion to $1.6 billion.
Keystone has its own line of credit facility with a maximum availability of up to $12 million, the actual amount of which is determined pursuant to a collateral base calculation. Borrowings under this facility are payable upon demand with interest being paid monthly. Interest accrues each day at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% above the greater of the one month or one day LIBOR. The borrowing base under the facility allows for financing up to the greater of the note or 80% of eligible accounts receivable. Based on the collateral assets at December 31, 2017, $7 million was available to borrow. At December 31, 2017, there were no outstanding borrowings.
The following table summarizes information regarding the Company’s aggregate credit facility commitments, letter of credit sub-limits and available funds under those revolving credit facilities, as well as outstanding amountsthe available capacity for each, as of commercial paper and outstanding borrowings under the respective facilitiesDecember 31:
2022
Commercial Paper LimitLetters of CreditTotal (a)
(In millions)
Total availability$2,600 $150 $2,750 
Outstanding debt(1,177)(78)(1,255)
Remaining availability as of December 31, 2022$1,423 $72 $1,495 
(a)Total remaining availability of $1.50 billion as of December 31, 20172022, may be accessed through revolver draws.
67

2021
Commercial Paper LimitLetters of CreditTotal (a)
(In millions)
Total availability$2,100 $150 $2,250 
Outstanding debt(584)(76)(660)
Remaining availability as of December 31, 2021$1,516 $74 $1,590 
(a)Total remaining availability of $1.59 billion as of December 31, 2021, may be accessed through revolver draws.
Presented in the table below is the Company’s total available liquidity as of December 31, 2022 and 2016:2021:
(Dollars in millions)Credit Facility
Commitment
 Available Credit
Facility Capacity
 Letter of Credit
Sublimit
 Available Letter of
Credit Capacity
 Commercial
Paper Limit
 Available Commercial
Paper Capacity
December 31, 2017$1,762
 $1,673
 $150
 $66
 $1,600
 $695
December 31, 20161,766
 1,668
 150
 62
 1,600
 751
Cash and Cash EquivalentsAvailability on Revolving Credit FacilityTotal Available Liquidity
(In millions)
Available liquidity as of December 31, 2022$85 $1,495 $1,580 
Available liquidity as of December 31, 2021116 1,590 1,706 
The weighted-averageweighted average interest rate on AWCCAWCC’s outstanding short-term borrowings was approximately 4.41% and 0.20%, for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016 was approximately 1.24% and 0.78%,2021, respectively.
Capital Structure
The followingPresented in the table indicatesbelow is the percentage of ourthe Company’s capitalization represented by the components of ourits capital structure as of December 31:
202220212020
2017 2016 2015
Total common stockholders' equity41.0% 42.1% 43.5%
Total common shareholders’ equityTotal common shareholders’ equity38.3 %39.9 %37.1 %
Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value49.6% 46.4% 50.6%Long-term debt and redeemable preferred stock at redemption value54.4 %56.6 %53.6 %
Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt9.4% 11.5% 5.9%Short-term debt and current portion of long-term debt7.3 %3.5 %9.3 %
Total100% 100% 100%Total100 %100 %100 %
The changes in the capital structure mix between periods were mainly attributable to an increase in the current portionimpacts of the HOS sale on December 9, 2021, and the repayment of short-term borrowings with proceeds from the sale, and the Company’s long-term debt.debt offering that was completed on May 5, 2022.
Debt Covenants
OurThe Company’s debt agreements contain financial and non-financial covenants. To the extent that we arethe Company is not in compliance with these covenants, an event of default may occur under one or more debt agreements and wethe Company, or ourits subsidiaries, may be restricted in ourits ability to pay dividends, issue new debt or access ourthe revolving credit facility. OurThe long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that, among other things, prohibit or restrict the Company from issuing debt secured by the Company’s assets, subject to certain exceptions. Our failureFailure to comply with any of these covenants could accelerate repayment obligations.

Covenants in certain long-term notes and the revolving credit facility require usthe Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization (as defined in the relevant documents) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00. On December 31, 2017, our2022, the Company’s ratio was 0.590.62 to 1.00 and therefore we werethe Company was in compliance with the covenants.
68

Security Ratings
Our access to the capital markets, including the commercial paper market, and respective financing costs in those markets, may be directly affected by our securities ratings. We primarily access the debt capital markets, including the commercial paper market, through AWCC. However, we have also issued debt through our regulated subsidiaries, primarilyPresented in the form of tax exempt securities or borrowings under state revolving funds, to lower our overall cost of debt.
The following table presents ourbelow are long-term and short-term credit ratingratings and rating outlookoutlooks as of February 20, 2018:
15, 2023, as issued by Moody’s Investors Service on December 19, 2022, and S&P Global Ratings on February 6, 2023:
SecuritiesMoody’s Investors ServiceStandard & Poor’sS&P Global Ratings Service
Rating outlookStableStable
Rating OutlookNegativeStable
Senior unsecured debtA3Baa1A
Commercial paperP-2P-2A-1
On January 19, 2018, Moody’s Investors Service changed the rating outlooks to negative, from stable, for 24 regulated utilities and utility holding companies, including the Company, all of which were primarily impacted by enactment of the TCJA. A security rating is not a recommendation to buy, sell or hold securities and may be subject to revision or withdrawal at any time by the assigning rating agency, and each rating should be evaluated independently of any other rating. Security ratings are highly dependent upon ourthe ability to generate cash flows in an amount sufficient to service our debt and meet our investment plans. WeThe Company can provide no assurances that ourits ability to generate cash flows is sufficient to maintain ourits existing ratings. None of ourthe Company’s borrowings are subject to default or prepayment as a result of the downgrading of these security ratings, although such a downgrading could increase fees and interest charges under ourits credit facility.
As part of theits normal course of business, wethe Company routinely enterenters into contracts for the purchase and sale of water, energy,power and other fuel, chemicals and other services. These contracts either contain express provisions or otherwise permit usthe Company and ourits counterparties to demand adequate assurance of future performance when there are reasonable grounds for doing so. In accordance with the contracts and applicable contract law, if we arethe Company is downgraded by a credit rating agency, especially if such downgrade is to a level below investment grade, it is possible that a counterparty would attempt to rely on such a downgrade as a basis for making a demand for adequate assurance of future performance, which could include a demand that wethe Company must provide collateral to secure ourits obligations. We doThe Company does not expect to post any collateral which will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Dividends
Our Board of Directors authorizesAccess to the payment of dividends. Our ability to pay dividends on our common stock is subject to having access to sufficient sources of liquidity,capital markets, including the net incomecommercial paper market, and cash flows of our subsidiaries, the receipt of dividends and repayments of indebtedness from our subsidiaries, compliance with Delaware corporate and other laws, compliance with the contractual provisions of debt and other agreements, and other factors. The Company’s dividend rate on its common stock is determinedrespective financing costs in those markets, may be directly affected by the BoardCompany’s securities ratings. The Company primarily accesses the debt capital markets, including the commercial paper market, through AWCC. However, the Company has also issued debt through its regulated subsidiaries, primarily in the form of Directors on a quarterly basismortgage bonds and takes into consideration, among other factors, currenttax exempt securities or borrowings under state revolving funds, to lower the overall cost of debt.
Dividends and possible future developments that may affectRegulatory Restrictions
For discussion of the Company’s income and cash flows. Historically, dividends, have been paid quarterly to holders of record less than 30 days prior to the distribution date. Since the dividends on our common stock are not cumulative, only declared dividends are paid.
During 2017, 2016 and 2015, we paid $289 million, $261 million and $239 million in cash dividends, respectively. The following table summarizes the per share cash dividends paid for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015:
 2017 2016 2015
December$0.415
 $0.375
 $0.34
September$0.415
 $0.375
 $0.34
June$0.415
 $0.375
 $0.34
March$0.375
 $0.34
 $0.31
On December 8, 2017, our Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend payment of $0.415 per share payable on March 1, 2018, to stockholders of record as of February 7, 2018.

Regulatory Restrictions
The issuance by the Company or AWCC of long-term debt or equity securities does not require authorization of any state PUC if no guarantee or pledge of the regulated subsidiaries is utilized. However, state PUC authorization is required to issue long-term debt at most of our regulated subsidiaries. Our regulated subsidiaries normally obtain the required approvals on a periodic basis to cover their anticipated financing needs for a period of time or in connection with a specific financing.
Under applicable law, our subsidiaries can pay dividends only from retained, undistributed or current earnings. A significant loss recorded at a subsidiary may limit the dividends that the subsidiary can distribute to us. Furthermore, the ability of our subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends or repay indebtedness to American Water is subject to compliance with applicable regulatory restrictions and financial obligations, including,dividend policy, see Note 9—Shareholders’ Equity in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for example, debt service and preferred and preference stock dividends, as well as applicable corporate, tax and other laws and regulations, and other agreements or covenants made or entered into by American Water and its subsidiaries.additional information.
Insurance Coverage
We carryThe Company carries various property, casualty, cyber and financial insurance policies with limits, deductibles and exclusions that we believeit believes are consistent with industry standards. However, insurance coverage may not be adequate or available to cover unanticipated losses or claims. Additionally, annual policy renewals can be impacted by claims experience which in turn can impact coverage terms and conditions on a going forwardgoing-forward basis. We areThe Company is self-insured to the extent that losses are within the policy deductible or exceed the amount of insurance maintained. Such losses could have a material adverse effect on ourthe Company’s short-term and long-term financial condition and ourits results of operations and cash flows.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
We enter into contractual obligations with third parties in the ordinary course of business. Information related to our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2017 is summarized in the table below:
Contractual obligation (In millions) Total 1 year or Less 2-3 Years 4-5 years More Than
5 years
Long-term debt obligations (a)
 $6,814
 $320
 $218
 $420
 $5,856
Interest on long-term debt (b)
 5,047
 324
 600
 571
 3,552
Operating lease obligations (c)
 123
 15
 26
 17
 65
Purchase water obligations (d)
 979
 59
 130
 129
 661
Other purchase obligations (e)
 235
 235
 
 
 
Postretirement benefit plans' obligations (f)
 3
 
 3
 
 
Pension plan obligations (f)
 239
 39
 91
 109
 
Preferred stocks with mandatory redemption requirements 10
 2
 3
 2
 3
Interest on preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements 5
 1
 1
 1
 2
Other obligations (g)
 1,113
 430
 213
 154
 316
Total $14,568
 $1,425
 $1,285
 $1,403
 $10,455
Note:  The above table reflects only financial obligations and commitments. Therefore, performance obligations associated with our Market-Based Businesses are not included in the above amounts. Also, uncertain tax positions of $106 million are not reflected in this table as we cannot predict when open tax years will close with completed examinations. See Note 13—Income Taxes in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
(a)Represents sinking fund obligations, debt maturities and capital lease obligations.
(b)Represents expected interest payments on outstanding long-term debt. Amounts reported may differ from actual due to future financing of debt.
(c)Represents future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases, primarily for the lease of motor vehicles, buildings, land and other equipment including water facilities and systems constructed by partners under the Public-Private Partnerships described below.
(d)Represents future payments under water purchase agreements for minimum quantities of water.
(e)Represents the open purchase orders as of December 31, 2017 for goods and services purchased in the ordinary course of business.
(f)Represents contributions expected to be made to pension and postretirement benefit plans for the years 2018 through 2022.
(g)Includes an estimate of advances for construction to be refunded, capital expenditures estimated to be required under legal and binding contractual obligations, contracts entered into for energy purchases, a liability associated with a conservation agreement and service agreements.

Public-Private Partnerships
WVAWC has entered into a series of agreements with various public entities, which we refer to as the Partners, to establish certain joint ventures, commonly referred to as “public-private partnerships.” Under the public-private partnerships, WVAWC constructed utility plant, financed by WVAWC, and the Partners constructed utility plant (connected to WVAWC’s property), financed by the Partners. WVAWC agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the Partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of Industrial Development Bonds, commonly referred to as IDBs, issued by the Partners under a state Industrial Development Bond and Commercial Development Act. WVAWC leased back the total facilities, including portions funded by both WVAWC and the Partners, under leases for a period of 40 years.
The leases have payments that approximate the payments required by the terms of the IDBs. These payments are considered “PILOT payments” which represent payments that WVAWC otherwise would pay as property taxes on the properties. We have presented the transaction on a net basis in the Consolidated Financial Statements. The carrying value of the transferred facilities, which is presented in property, plant and equipment in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, was approximately $150 million as of December 31, 2017.
Performance Obligations
We have entered into agreements for the provision of services to water and wastewater facilities for the United States military, municipalities and other customers. These military services agreements expire between 2051 and 2068 and have remaining performance commitments as measured by estimated remaining contract revenues of $3.6 billion as of December 31, 2017. The operations and maintenance agreements with municipalities and other customers expire between 2018 and 2038 and have remaining performance commitments as measured by estimated remaining contract revenue of $711 million as of December 31, 2017. Some of the Company’s long-term contracts to operate and maintain a municipality’s, federal government’s or other party’s water or wastewater treatment and delivery facilities include responsibility for certain major maintenance for some of the facilities, in exchange for an annual fee.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires that management apply accounting policies and make estimates, assumptions and judgments that could significantly affect a company’sthe Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Actual results could differ from these estimates, assumptions and judgments. Management believes that the areas described below require significant judgment in the application of accounting policy or in making estimates and assumptions in matters that are inherently uncertain and that may change in subsequent periods. Accordingly, changes in the estimates, assumptions and judgments applied to these accounting policies could have a significant impact on ourthe Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows, as reflected in ourthe Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. Management has reviewed the critical accounting polices described below with our audit committee,the Company’s Audit, Finance and Risk Committee, including the estimates, assumptions and judgments used in their application. Additional discussion regarding these critical accounting policies and their application can be found in Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.Statements.
Rate
69

Regulation and Regulatory Accounting
OurThe Company’s regulated utilities are subject to economic regulation by PUCs and, as such, we followthe Company follows the authoritative accounting principles required for rate regulated utilities, which requires usthe Company to reflect the effects of rate regulation in ourits Consolidated Financial Statements. Use of this authoritative guidance is applicable to utility operations that meet the following criteria: (i) third-party regulation of rates; (ii) cost-based rates; and (iii) a reasonable assumption that rates will be set to recover the estimated costs of providing service, plus a return on net investment, or rate base. As of December 31, 2017, we2022, the Company concluded that the operations of ourits utilities met the criteria.
Application of this authoritative guidance has a further effect on ourthe Company’s financial statements as it pertains to allowable costs used in the ratemaking process. We makeThe Company makes significant assumptions and estimates to quantify amounts recorded as regulatory assets and liabilities. Such judgments include, but are not limited to, assets and liabilities related to regulated acquisitions, pension and postretirement benefits, depreciation rates and taxes. Due to timing and other differences in the collection of revenues, these authoritative accounting principles allow a cost that would otherwise be charged as an expense by ana non-regulated entity, to be deferred as a regulatory asset if it is probable that such cost is recoverable through future rates. Conversely, the principles require the creation of a regulatory liability for amounts collected in rates to recover costs expected to be incurred in the future, or amounts collected in excess of costs incurred and are refundable to customers. Regulators may also impose certain fines or penalties.

For each regulatory jurisdiction where we conductthe Company conducts business, we assess,the Company assesses, at the end of each reporting period, whether the regulatory assets continue to meet the criteria for probable future recovery and regulatory liabilities continue to meet the criteria for probable future recovery or settlement. This assessment includes consideration of factors such as changes in applicable regulatory environments;environments, recent rate orders (including recent rate orders on recovery of a specific or similar incurred cost to other regulated entities in the same jurisdictionjurisdiction) and the status of any pending or potential legislation that could impact the ability to recover costs through regulated rates.legislation. If subsequent events indicate that the regulatory assets or liabilities no longer meet the criteria for probable future recovery or probable future settlement, ourthe Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and financial position could be materially affected. In addition, if we concludethe Company concludes in a future period that a separable portion of the business no longer meets the criteria, we arethe Company is required to eliminate the financial statement effects of regulation for that part of the business, which would include the elimination of any or all regulatory assets and liabilities that had been recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Failure to meet the criteria of this authoritative guidance could materially impact ourthe Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law, which, among other things, enacted significant and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as of January 1, 2018. The TCJA created significant excess deferred income taxes that the Company and its regulatory jurisdictions believe should be refunded to customers. As such, we recorded these amounts as regulatory liabilities. The PUCs in our regulatory jurisdictions have opened formal proceedings related to the TCJA and we have begun working with our regulators on options to provide the income tax savings to our customers, and to address customer rate impacts and cash flow impacts for the Company. The outcome of these proceedings will likely take some time and could vary by regulatory jurisdiction.
As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, our2021, the Company’s regulatory asset balance was $1.1$1.0 billion and $1.3$1.1 billion, respectively, and ourits regulatory liability balance was $1.7$1.6 billion and $403 million,$1.6 billion, respectively. See Note 6—3—Regulatory Assets and LiabilitiesMatters in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding ourthe Company’s significant regulatory assets and liabilities.
Goodwill
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, our goodwill balance was $1.4 billion and $1.3 billion, respectively. Under GAAP, goodwill must be allocated at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below, and evaluated for impairment minimally, once a year. We perform an annual review for impairment of goodwill as of November 30 of each year, or more frequently if we determine that changes in circumstances or a triggering event that would more likely than not, reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value, has occurred. Adverse industry or economic trends, lower projections of profitability, or a sustained decline in our market capitalization, among other things, may be indicators of potential goodwill impairment issues, requiring the testing of the carrying value for recoverability.
Entities evaluating goodwill for impairment have the option of first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether a quantitative assessment is necessary. In performing a qualitative assessment, we assess and makes judgments, among other things, around macroeconomic conditions, industry and market conditions, overall financial performance, cost factors and entity specific events. These factors require significant judgment and estimates, and application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results. If it is determined, based upon qualitative factors, that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not, greater than its carrying value, no further testing is required. If an entity bypasses the qualitative assessment, or performs the qualitative assessment but determines that the fair value of a reporting unit is more likely than not, less than its carrying value, a two-step, quantitative fair value assessment is performed.
The first step of a quantitative assessment compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its respective net carrying value, including goodwill, on the measurement date. If the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is less than such reporting unit’s carrying value, then the second step of the quantitative assessment is performed to measure the amount of the impairment loss, if any, for such reporting unit.
The second step of a quantitative assessment requires an allocation of fair value to the individual assets and liabilities of the reporting unit, using purchase price allocation accounting guidance in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. If the implied fair value of goodwill is less than the carrying value for the reporting unit, an impairment loss is recorded as a reduction to goodwill and a charge to operating expense. Application of goodwill impairment testing requires significant management judgment, including the identification of reporting units and determining the fair value of the reporting unit. We estimate fair value using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and market multiples analysis. Significant assumptions used in these fair value analyses include, but are not limited to, forecasts of future operating results, discount and growth rates, capital expenditures, tax rates, working capital, weighted average cost of capital and projected terminal values. Changes in estimates or the application of alternative assumptions could produce significantly different results.

At November 30, 2017, we completed qualitative assessments for our Regulated Businesses, Military Services Group and Contract Operations Group reporting units, and determined that no qualitative factors were present that would indicate the estimated fair values of these reporting units were less than their respective carrying values. As such, we determined that the two-step, quantitative fair value assessment was not necessary for these reporting units as of November 30, 2017.
At November 30, 2017, we completed step one of the two-step, quantitative assessment for our Homeowner Services Group and Keystone reporting units, and concluded there were no impairments to their respective goodwill carry values. We used an income approach valuation technique which estimates discounted future cash flows from operations, which relies on a single scenario reflecting the best estimate of projected cash flows. The estimated fair value of the Homeowner Services Group reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by more than 156%. The estimated fair value of the Keystone reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 11%. If further decline in the fair value were to occur, the Keystone reporting unit would be at risk of failing step one of the two-step, quantitative assessment. Additional discussion regarding our goodwill can be found in Note 7—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets include land, buildings, equipment and long-term investments. Other than land and long-term investments, our long-lived assets are depreciated over their estimated useful lives and are reviewed for impairment whenever changes in circumstances indicate that their carrying value may not be recoverable. Such circumstances include, but are not limited to, a significant decrease in the market value of the long-lived asset, a change in the asset’s expected useful life or physical condition, a history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset or a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or is planned to be used. When such events or changes occur, we estimate the fair value of the long-lived asset from future cash flows expected to result from its use and, if applicable, the eventual disposition of the asset, and compare it to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value of the long-lived asset is greater than its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount by which carrying value exceeds fair value. Key variables that must be estimated include assumptions regarding sales volume, rates, operating costs, labor and other benefit costs, capital additions, assumed discount rates and other economic factors. These variables require significant management judgment and include inherent uncertainties, since they are forecasting future events. A variation in the assumptions used could lead to a different conclusion regarding the realizability of a long-lived asset and, thus, could have a significant effect on our Consolidated Financial Statements.
The long-lived assets of our regulated utilities are grouped on a separate entity basis for impairment testing, as they are integrated state-wide operations that do not have the option to curtail service and generally have uniform tariffs. A regulatory asset is charged to earnings if and when future recovery in rates of that asset is no longer probable. The fair values of our long-term investments are dependent on the financial performance and solvency of the entities in which we invest, as well as volatility inherent in the external markets, all of which are factors that we consider when assessing the potential impairment of these investments. If such long-term investments are considered impaired, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount by which the investment’s carrying value exceeds its fair value.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue for our regulated utilities is recognized as water and wastewater services are delivered to customers and includes amounts billed to customers on a cycle basis, and unbilled amounts which are based on estimated usage from the date of the meter reading associated with the latest customer bill, to the end of the accounting period. Increases or decreases in the volumes delivered to customers and rate mix due to changes in usage patterns in customer classes in the period could be significant to the calculation of unbilled revenue. In addition, changes in the timing of meter reading schedules and the number and type of customers scheduled for each meter reading date would also have an effect on the unbilled revenue calculation. Unbilled revenue for our regulated utilities as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $152 million and $161 million, respectively.
Revenues of the Market-Based Businesses are recognized as services are rendered. For certain construction contracts, revenue is recognized over the contract term based on a calculated ratio that compares the costs incurred to date during the period to the total estimated costs for the entire contract. Losses on contracts are recognized during the period in which the loss first becomes probable and estimable. Revenues recognized during the period in excess of billings on construction contracts are recorded as unbilled revenue. Billings in excess of revenues recognized on construction contracts are recorded as other current liabilities on the balance sheet until the recognition criteria are met. Changes in contract performance and related estimated contract profitability may result in revisions to costs and revenues and are recognized in the period in which revisions are determined. Unbilled revenue for our Market-Based Businesses as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $60 million and $102 million, respectively.

Accounting for Income Taxes
Significant management judgment is required in determining the provision for income taxes, primarily due to the uncertainty related to tax positions taken, as well as deferred tax assets and liabilities, valuation allowances and the utilization of net operating lossNOL carryforwards.
In accordance with applicable authoritative guidance, we accountthe Company accounts for uncertain income tax positions using a benefit recognition model with a two-step approach, including a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold and a measurement approach based on the largest amount of tax benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon ultimate settlement. If it is not more-likely-than-not that the benefit of the tax position will be sustained on its technical merits, no benefit is recorded. Uncertain tax positions that relate only to timing of when an item is included on a tax return are considered to have met the recognition threshold. Management evaluates each position based solely on the technical merits and facts and circumstances of the position, assuming the position will be examined by a taxing authority having full knowledge of all relevant information. Significant judgment is required to determine whether the recognition threshold has been met and, if so, the appropriate amount of unrecognized tax benefit to be recorded in the Consolidated Financial Statements.
We evaluateThe Company evaluates the probability of realizing deferred tax assets quarterly by reviewing a forecast of future taxable income and ourits intent and ability to implement tax planning strategies, if necessary, to realize deferred tax assets. WeThe Company also assess ourassesses its ability to utilize tax attributes, including those in the form of carryforwards, for which the benefits have already been reflected in the financial statements. We recordThe Company records valuation allowances for deferred tax assets when we concludeit concludes that it is more-likely-than-not such benefit will not be realized in future periods.
Under GAAP, specifically Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) TopicASC 740, Income Taxes, the tax effects of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. ASC 740 also requires deferred tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. Thus, atFor the date of enactment, the Company’s deferred taxes were re-measured based upon the new tax rate. For our regulated entities, the change in deferred taxes are recorded as either an offset to a regulatory asset or a regulatory liability and may be subject to refund to customers. For ourthe Company’s unregulated operations, the change in deferred taxes are recorded as a non-cash re-measurement adjustment to earnings.
The staff
70

Table of the SEC has recognized the complexity of reflecting the impacts of changes in tax law, more specifically the TCJA, and on December 22, 2017, issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) which clarifies accounting for income taxes under ASC 740 if information is not yet available or complete and provides for up to a one year period in which to complete the required analyses and accounting. SAB 118 describes three scenarios or buckets associated with a company’s status of accounting for the TCJA:(1) a company is complete with its accounting for certain effects of tax reform, (2) a company is able to determine a reasonable estimate for certain effects of tax reform and records that estimate as a provisional amount, or (3) a company is not able to determine a reasonable estimate and therefore continues to apply ASC 740, based on the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to the TCJA being enacted. The significant assumptions considered and evaluated by the Company relating to our accounting for the TCJA, include, but are not limited to, the:Contents
recording of regulatory liabilities from the re-measurement of the Company’s deferred income taxes, and the uncertainty of regulatory treatment in our various jurisdictions in which the Company currently operates;
allocation of interest deductibility at the parent to our subsidiaries;
bonus depreciation deductions for assets constructed and placed in service during the period September 28, 2017 through December 31, 2017; and
normalization periods for our re-measured deferred taxes.
Actual income taxes could vary from estimated amounts due to the future impacts of various items, including changes in income tax laws, ourthe Company’s forecasted financial condition and results of operations, failure to successfully implement tax planning strategies and recovery of taxes through the regulatory process for ourthe Regulated Businesses, as well as results of audits and examinations of filed tax returns by taxing authorities. While we believe theThe resulting tax balances as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021 are appropriately accounted for in accordance with the applicable authoritative guidance,guidance; however, the ultimate outcome of tax matters could result in favorable or unfavorable adjustments to ourthe Consolidated Financial Statements and such adjustments could be material. See Note 13—14—Income Taxes in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information regarding income taxes.
Accounting for Pension and Postretirement Benefits
We maintainThe Company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of ourits regulated utility and shared service operations. The Company also maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing medical and life insurance to eligible retirees. See Note 14—2—Significant Accounting Policies and Note 15—Employee Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for furtheradditional information regarding the description of and accounting for the defined benefit pension plans and postretirement benefit plans.

The Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs are developed from actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are key assumptions provided by the Company to its actuaries, including the discount rate and expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. Material changes in the Company’s pension and postretirement benefit costs may occur in the future due to changes in these assumptions as well as fluctuations in plan assets. The assumptions are selected to represent the average expected experience over time and may differ in any one year from actual experience due to changes in capital markets and the overall economy. These differences will impact the amount of pension and other postretirement benefit expense that the Company recognizes. The primary assumptions are:
Discount Rate—The discount rate is used in calculating the present value of benefits, which are based on projections of benefit payments to be made in the future. The objective in selecting the discount rate is to measure the single amount that, if invested at the measurement date in a portfolio of high-quality debt instruments, would provide the necessary future cash flows to pay the accumulated benefits when due;due.
Expected Return on Plan Assets (“EROA”)—Management projects the future return on plan assets considering prior performance, but primarily based upon the plans’ mix of assets and expectations for the long-term returns on those asset classes. These projected returns reduce the net benefit costs we record currently;the Company records currently.
Rate of Compensation Increase—Management projects employees’ pay increases, which are used to project employees’ pension benefits at retirement;retirement.
Health Care Cost Trend Rate—Management projects the expected increases in the cost of health care; andcare.
Mortality—Management retainedadopted the Society of Actuaries RP-2014Pri-2012 mortality base table, butthe most recent table developed from private pension plan experience, which provides rates of mortality in 2012 and adopted the new MP-2017 generational projectionMP-2021 mortality improvement scale to projectgradually adjust future mortality improvementsrates downward due to increased longevity in each year after 2006.2012.
The discount rate assumption, which is determined for the pension and postretirement benefit plans independently, is subject to change each year, consistent with changes in applicable high-quality, long-term corporate bond indices. We useThe Company uses an approach that approximates the process of settlement of obligations tailored to the plans’ expected cash flows by matching the plans’ cash flows to the coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds. The yield curve was developed for a portfolio containing the majority of United States-issued AA-graded non-callable (or callable with make-whole provisions) corporate bonds. For each plan, the discount rate was developed as the level equivalent rate that would yield the same present value as using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments. The weighted-average discount rate assumption for determining pension benefit obligations was 3.75%5.58%, 4.28%2.94% and 4.66%2.74% at December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. The weighted-average discount rate assumption for determining other post-retirementpostretirement benefit obligations was 3.73%5.60%, 4.26%2.90% and 4.67%2.56% at December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.
In selecting an EROA, wethe Company considered tax implications, past performance and economic forecasts for the types of investments held by the plans. The long-termweighted-average EROA assumption used in calculating pension cost was 6.49%6.50% for 2017, 7.02%2022, 6.50% for 2016,2021, and 6.91%6.50% for 2015.2020. The weighted averageweighted-average EROA assumption used in calculating other postretirement benefit costs was 5.09%3.60% for 2017, 5.37%2022, 3.67% for 20162021 and 4.92%3.68% for 2015.
The asset allocations for the Company’s U.S. pension plan by asset category were as follows:2020.
71

  
Target
Allocation
 
Percentage of Plan Assets
as of December 31,
Asset Category 2018 2017 2016
Equity securities 43% 44% 49%
Fixed income 50% 49% 42%
Real Estate 5% 5% 7%
Real estate investment trusts (“REITs”) 2% 2% 2%
Total 100% 100% 100%
During 2017,Presented in the Company reducedtable below are the riskallocations of its investments in the pension plan assets by reducing its exposure to equities from 60% to 50%, and increasing its long duration fixed-income allocation from 40% to 50%. This new structure is designed to reduceasset category:
 2023 Target AllocationPercentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,
Asset Category20222021
Equity securities37 %57 %53 %
Fixed income63 %43 %47 %
Total100 %100 %100 %
Presented in the plan’s funded status volatility. It is also intended to reducetable below are the pension plan’s exposure to interest rates since a higher proportion of long duration fixed-income securities that have a duration similar to thatallocations of the pension liabilities should reduce interest rate risk associated with the plan’s liabilities.

The Company’s other postretirement benefit plans are partially funded. Theplan assets by asset category:
 2023 Target Allocation (a)Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31,
Asset Category20222021
Equity securities27 %30 %22 %
Fixed income73 %70 %78 %
Total100 %100 %100 %
(a)Refer to Note 15—Employee Benefits in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional details on the allocations forof assets and the Company’strusts which fund the other postretirement benefit plans by asset category were as follows:
  
Target
Allocation
 
Percentage of Plan Assets
as of December 31,
Asset Category 2018 2017 2016
Equity securities 38% 35% 33%
Fixed income 62% 65% 67%
REITs 
 
 
Total 100% 100% 100%
The Company’s target asset allocation, is evaluated periodically through asset liability studies. The studies consider projected cash flows of maturity liabilities, projected asset class returns and risks, correlations, and the Company’s risk tolerance. In 2017, the Company conducted new asset-liability studies for the Post-Retirement Plans and approved new asset allocations for both plans. The Post-Retirement Medical Bargaining plan increased its equity allocation from 20% to 30% due to rising medical claims and medical inflation and the long duration portion of the portfolio was reduced from 80% to 70%. The Post-Retirement Non-Bargaining Medical Plan’s allocation was adjusted to reduce volatility and interest rate risk in a manner similar to that described above with respect to the pension plan, reducing the equity allocation from 70% to 60% and increasing the fixed-income allocation from 30% to 40%. The Post-Retirement Medical Non-Bargaining plan’s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and the resultant reduction in the plan’s liabilities. These changes will be implemented in 2018.
The investments of the pension and postretirement welfare plan trusts include debt and equity securities held either directly or through mutual funds, commingled funds.funds and limited partnerships. The trustee for the Company’s defined benefit pension and postretirement welfare plans uses an independent valuation firm to calculate the fair value of plan assets. Additionally, the Company independently verifies the assets values. Approximately 41% of the assets are valued using the quoted market price for the assets in an active market at the measurement date, while 59% of the assets are valued using other inputs.
In selecting a rate of compensation increase, we considerthe Company considers past experience in light of movements in inflation rates. OurThe Company’s rate of compensation increase was 3.02%3.51% for 2017, 3.07%2022, 3.51% for 20162021 and 3.10%3.51% for 2015.2020.
In selecting health care cost trend rates, we considerthe Company considers past performance and forecasts of increases in health care costs. As of January 1, 2017, our2022, the Company’s health care cost trend rate assumption used to calculate the periodic benefit cost was 7%6.00% in 20172022 gradually declining to 5%5.00% in 20212026 and thereafter. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company is projectingprojects that medical inflation will continuebe 7.00% in 2023 gradually declining to persist for longer than expected5.00% in 2031 and it will ultimately trend down to 4.50%, but not until 2026.thereafter.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect on the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans. The health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
Change in Actuarial Assumption (Dollars in millions) Impact on Other
Postretirement
Benefit Obligation as of December 31, 2017
 Impact on 2017
Total Service
and
Interest Cost
Components
Increase assumed health care cost trend by 1% $73
 $5
Decrease assumed health care cost trend by 1% $(60) $(4)
WeCompany will use a weighted-average discount rate and EROA of 3.75%5.58% and 5.95%6.75%, respectively, for estimating our 2018its 2023 pension costs. Additionally, wethe Company will use a weighted-average discount rate and expected blended return based on weighted assetsEROA of 3.73%5.60% and 4.77%5.00%, respectively, for estimating our 2018its 2023 other postretirement benefit costs. A decrease in the discount rate or the EROA would increase ourthe Company’s pension expense. Our 2017 and 2016The Company’s 2022 pension and postretirement total net benefit costs were $56credit was $47 million and $54 million, respectively.the 2021 pension and postretirement total net benefit credit was $41 million. The Company expects to make pension and postretirement benefit contributions to the plan trusts up to $45of $39 million in 2018, and $47 million, $47 million, $51 million and $58 million in 2019, 2020, 2021 and 2022, respectively. Actual2023; however, the actual amounts contributed could change significantlymaterially from these estimates.this estimate. The assumptions are reviewed annually and at any interim re-measurement of the plan obligations. The impact of assumption changes is reflected in the recorded pension and postretirement benefit amounts as they occur, or over a period of time if allowed under applicable accounting standards.
Benefit Plan Amendments
In December 2022, the Company amended the American Water Pension Plan (“AWPP”), a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, to restructure it as of December 31, 2022. The restructuring involved the spin-off of certain inactive participants from the existing AWPP into a separate tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, the American Water Pension Plan for Certain Inactive Participants (“AWPP Inactive”). Benefits offered to the plan participants remain unchanged. Actuarial gains and losses associated with AWPP Inactive will be amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants, which increases the amortization period from approximately 7 years to 18 years. The longer amortization period is expected to lower the Company’s pre-tax pension expense by approximately $5 million in 2023. The actuarial gains and losses associated with the AWPP will continue to be amortized over the average remaining service period for active participants. The Company remeasured the pension plan obligation and assets for each plan as of December 31, 2022.
72

Upon evaluating prior plan changes, Company funding and market performance, in December 2022, the Company completed plan amendments to spin-off and merge a portion of the American Water Retiree Welfare Plan, with and into the Company’s medical plan for active employees (“Active Medical Plan”), in order to repurpose the over-funded portion of the Bargained Retiree Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (“Bargained VEBA”) trust. Benefits offered to the plan participants remain unchanged. As a result of these assumptions changechanges, effective December 31, 2022, the Company transferred investment assets from the Bargained VEBA into the existing trust maintained for the benefit of Active Medical Plan participants (“Active VEBA”). The transfer of these Bargained VEBA investment assets into the Active VEBA permits access to approximately $194 million of assets for purposes of paying active union employee medical benefits. The Company recorded the transfer of assets as a negative contribution and therefore did not record a gain or loss, as permitted by accounting guidance. See Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Information in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for additional information on accounting for the assets as investments in debt and equity securities as of December 31, 2022.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue from the Company’s Regulated Businesses is generated primarily from water and wastewater services delivered to customers. These contracts contain a single performance obligation, the delivery of water or wastewater services, as the promise to transfer the individual good or service is not separately identifiable from other promises within the contracts and, therefore, is not distinct. Revenues are recognized over time, as services are provided. There are generally no significant financing components or variable consideration. Revenues include amounts billed to customers on a cycle basis, and unbilled amounts calculated based on estimated usage from the date of the meter reading associated with the latest customer bill, to the end of the accounting period. The amounts that the Company has a right to invoice are determined by each customer’s actual usage, an indicator that the invoice amount corresponds directly to the value transferred to the customer.
Increases or decreases in the volumes delivered to customers and rate mix due to changes in usage patterns in customer classes in the period could be significant to the calculation of unbilled revenue. In addition, changes in the timing of meter reading schedules and the number and type of customers scheduled for each meter reading date would also have an effect on the unbilled revenue calculation. Unbilled revenue for the Company’s regulated utilities as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $178 million and $162 million, respectively.
The Company also recognizes revenue when it is probable that future recovery of previously incurred costs or future refunds that are to be credited to customers will occur through the ratemaking process.
Revenue from the Company’s former HOS business, which was sold in December 2021, was generated through various protection programs in which the Company provided fixed fee services to domestic homeowners and smaller commercial customers for interior and exterior water and sewer lines, interior electric and gas lines, heating and cooling systems, water heaters, power surge protection and other related services. Most of the contracts had a one-year term and each service was a separate performance obligation, satisfied over time, as the customers simultaneously received and consumed the benefits provided from the service. Customers were obligated to pay for the protection programs ratably over 12 months or via a one-time, annual fee, with revenues recognized ratably over time for those services. Advances from customers were deferred until the performance obligation was satisfied.
The Company also has long-term, fixed fee contracts to operate and maintain water and wastewater systems for the U.S. government on various military installations and facilities owned by municipal customers. Billing and revenue recognition for the fixed fee revenues occurs ratably over the term of the contract, as customers simultaneously receive and consume the benefits provided by the Company. Additionally, these contracts allow the Company to make capital improvements to underlying infrastructure, which are initiated through separate modifications or amendments to the original contract, whereby stand-alone, fixed pricing is separately stated for each improvement. The Company has determined that these capital improvements are separate performance obligations, with revenue recognized over time based on performance completed at the end of each reporting period. Losses on contracts are recognized during the period in which the losses first become probable and estimable. Revenues recognized during the period in excess of billings on construction contracts are recorded pensionas unbilled revenues, with billings in excess of revenues recorded as other current liabilities until the recognition criteria are met. Changes in contract performance and postretirement benefit amountsrelated estimated contract profitability may result in revisions to costs and funding requirements could also change.revenues and are recognized in the period in which revisions are determined. Unbilled revenue within Other as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 was $97 million and $86 million, respectively.

73

Accounting for Contingencies
We recordThe Company records loss contingencies when management determines that the outcome of future events is probable of occurring and when the amount of the loss or a range of losses can be reasonably estimated. The determination of a loss contingency is based on managementmanagement’s judgment and estimates about the likely outcome of the matter, which may include an analysis of different scenarios. Liabilities are recorded or adjusted when events or circumstances cause these judgments or estimates to change. In assessing whether a loss is reasonably possible, management considers many factors, which include, but are not limedlimited to: the nature of the litigation, claim or assessment, review of applicable law, opinions or views of legal counsel and other advisors, and the experience gained from similar cases or situations. We provideThe Company provides disclosures for material contingencies when management deems there is a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred. We provideThe Company provides estimates of reasonably possible losses when such estimates may be reasonably determined, either as a single amount or within a reasonable range.
Actual amounts realized upon settlement or other resolution of loss contingencies may be different than amounts recorded and disclosed and could have a significant impact on the liabilities, revenue and expenses recorded on the Consolidated Financial Statements. For a discussion of contingencies, seeSee Note 15—16—Commitments and Contingencies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.Statements for additional information regarding contingencies.
NewRecent Accounting Standards
See Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for a description of recent accounting standards.
ITEM 7A.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
We areITEM 7A.    QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
The Company is exposed to market risk associated with changes in commodity prices, equity prices and interest rates. We areThe Company is exposed to risks from changes in interest rates as a result of ourits issuance of variable and fixed rate debt and commercial paper. We manage ourThe Company manages its interest rate exposure by limiting ourits variable rate exposure and by monitoring the effects of market changes in interest rates. WeThe Company also havehas the ability to enter into financial derivative instruments, which could include instruments such as, but not limited to, interest rate swaps, forward starting swaps swaptions and U.S. Treasury lock agreements to manage and mitigate interest rate risk exposure. As of December 31, 2017,2022, a hypothetical increase of interest rates by 1% associated with ourthe Company’s short-term borrowings would result in an $8a $6 million increase in short-term interest expense.
The Company has two forward starting swap agreements with an aggregate notional amount of $200 million to reduce interest rate exposure on debt expected to be issued in 2018. The forward starting swap agreements terminate in November 2018 and have an average fixed rate of 2.59%. When entering into forward starting interest rate swaps, the Company is subject to market risk with respect to changes in the underlying benchmark interest rate that impacts the fair value of the forward starting interest rate swaps. We manage market risk by matching terms of the swaps with the critical terms of the expected debt issuance. The fair value of the forward starting swaps at December 31, 2017 was in a loss position of $3 million. A hypothetical 1% adverse change in interest rates would result in a decrease in the fair value of our forward starting swaps of approximately $32 million at December 31, 2017.
OurCompany’s risks associated with price increases for chemicals, electricity and other commodities are reduced through contractual arrangements and the expected ability to recover price increases through rates, in the next general rate case proceeding or other regulatory mechanism, as authorized by each regulatory jurisdiction. Non-performance by these commodity suppliers could have a material adverse impact on ourthe Company’s results of operations, financial position and cash flows.
The market price of ourthe Company’s common stock may experience fluctuations, which may be unrelated to ourits operating performance. In particular, ourthe Company’s stock price may be affected by general market movements as well as developments specifically related to the water and wastewater industry. These could include, among other things, interest rate movements, quarterly variations or changes in financial estimates by securities analysts and governmental or regulatory actions. This volatility may make it difficult for usthe Company to access the capital markets in the future through additional offerings of ourits common stock or other equity securities, regardless of ourits financial performance, and such difficulty may preclude usthe Company from being able to take advantage of certain business opportunities or meet business obligations.
We areThe Company is exposed to credit risk through ourits water, wastewater and other water-related services provided by our Regulated Businesses and Market-Based Businesses. Ourrelated services. The Company’s Regulated Businesses serve residential, commercial, industrial and other customers, while our Market-Based Businessesthe businesses within Other engage in business activities with developers, government entities and other customers. OurThe Company’s primary credit risk is exposure to customer default on contractual obligations and the associated loss that may be incurred due to the non-payment of customer accounts receivable balances. OurThe Company’s credit risk is managed through established credit and collection policies which are in compliance with applicable regulatory requirements and involve monitoring of customer exposure and the use of credit risk mitigation measures such as letters of credit or prepayment arrangements. OurThe Company’s credit portfolio is diversified with no significant customer or industry concentrations. In addition, ourthe Regulated Businesses are generally able to recover all prudently incurred costs including uncollectible customer accounts receivable expenses and collection costs through rates.

74

The Company’s retirement trust assets are exposed to the market prices of debt and equity securities. Changes to the retirement trust asset values can impact the Company’s pension and other benefits expense, funded status and future minimum funding requirements. Changes in interest rates can impact retirement liabilities. We aimThe Company aims to reduce risk through asset diversification and by investing in long duration fixed-income securities that have a duration similar to that of ourits pension liabilities, seeking to hedge some of the interest rate sensitivity of ourits liabilities. That way, if interest rates fall and liabilities increase, we expectthe Company expects that the fixed-income assets in ourits retirement trust will also increase in value. WeThe Company also expect ourexpects its risk to be reduced through ourits ability to recover pension and other benefit costs through rates.
We areThe Company is also exposed to a potential national economic recession or deterioration in local economic conditions in the markets in which we operate.it operates. The credit quality of ourthe Company’s customer accounts receivable is dependent on the economy and the ability of ourits customers to manage through unfavorable economic cycles and other market changes. In addition, there can be no assurances that regulators will grant sufficient rate authorizations. Therefore, ourthe Company’s ability to fully recover operating expense, recover ourits investment and provide an appropriate return on invested capital made in ourthe Regulated Businesses may be adversely impacted.

75

ITEM 8.FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
ITEM 8.    FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

76


Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and StockholdersShareholders of
American Water Works Company, Inc.
Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of American Water Works Company, Inc. and its subsidiaries(the “Company”) as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021,and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, ofchanges in shareholders’ equity and cash flows and of changes in stockholders’ equity for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2017,2022, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”).We also have audited the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
In our opinion, the consolidatedfinancial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 20172022 and 20162021, and the results of theiritsoperations and their itscash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 20172022 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017,2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control - Integrated Framework(2013)issued by the COSO.
Basis for Opinions
The Company's management is responsible for these consolidated financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting appearing under Item 9A.Our responsibility is to express opinions on the Company’s consolidatedfinancial statements and on the Company's internal control over financial reporting based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB")(PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether theconsolidatedfinancial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects.
Our audits of the consolidatedfinancial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidatedfinancial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidatedfinancial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
77

Critical Audit Matters
The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (i) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (ii) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.
Accounting for the Effects of Rate Regulation
As described in Notes 2 and 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company’s consolidated regulatory assets and liabilities balances were $1,030 million and$1,595 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2022. The Company’s regulated utilities are subject to regulation by multiple state utility commissions and the Company follows authoritative accounting principles required for rate regulated utilities, which requires the effects of rate regulation to be reflected in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. As disclosed by management, for each regulatory jurisdiction where the Company conducts business, the Company assesses, at the end of each reporting period, whether the regulatory assets continue to meet the criteria for probable future recovery and regulatory liabilities continue to meet the criteria for probable future settlement. This assessment includes consideration of factors such as changes in regulatory environments, recent rate orders (including recent rate orders on recovery of a specific or similar incurred cost to other regulated entities in the same jurisdiction) and the status of any pending or potential legislation.
The principal considerations for our determination that performing procedures relating to accounting for the effects of rate regulation is a critical audit matter are the significant judgment by management in accounting for regulatory assets and liabilities relative to whether regulatory assets continue to meet the criteria for probable future recovery and regulatory liabilities continue to meet the criteria for probable future settlement as a result of changes in regulatory environments, recent rate orders, and the status of any pending or potential legislation. This in turn led to a high degree of auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit procedures and evaluating audit evidence obtained relating to management’s judgments.
Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of controls relating to the Company’s regulatory accounting process, including controls over management’s assessment and consideration of factors related to the probability of future recovery or settlement. These procedures alsoincluded, among others, evaluating the reasonableness of management’s judgments regarding the probability of recovery and settlement based on the Company’s correspondence with regulators, status of regulatory proceedings, past practices, and other relevant information; evaluating the related accounting and disclosure implications; and evaluating regulatory assets and liabilities balances based on provisions and formulas outlined in rate orders and other correspondence with the Company’s regulators.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
February 20, 201815, 2023
We have served as the Company’s auditor since 1948.

78


American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share data)
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment$21,716
 $19,954
Accumulated depreciation(5,470) (4,962)
Property, plant and equipment, net16,246
 14,992
Current assets:   
Cash and cash equivalents55
 75
Restricted funds27
 20
Accounts receivable, net272
 269
Unbilled revenues212
 263
Materials and supplies41
 39
Other113
 118
Total current assets720
 784
Regulatory and other long-term assets:   
Regulatory assets1,061
 1,289
Goodwill1,379
 1,345
Other76
 72
Total regulatory and other long-term assets2,516
 2,706
TOTAL ASSETS$19,482
 $18,482
  The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies  
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share data)
 December 31, 2017 December 31, 2016
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:   
Common stock ($0.01 par value, 500,000,000 shares authorized, 182,508,564 and 181,798,555 shares issued, respectively)$2
 $2
Paid-in-capital6,432
 6,388
Accumulated deficit(723) (873)
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(79) (86)
Treasury stock, at cost (4,064,010 and 3,701,867 shares, respectively)(247) (213)
Total common stockholders' equity5,385
 5,218
Long-term debt6,490
 5,749
Redeemable preferred stock at redemption value8
 10
Total long-term debt6,498
 5,759
Total capitalization11,883
 10,977
Current liabilities:   
Short-term debt905
 849
Current portion of long-term debt322
 574
Accounts payable195
 154
Accrued liabilities630
 609
Taxes accrued33
 31
Interest accrued73
 63
Other167
 112
Total current liabilities2,325
 2,392
Regulatory and other long-term liabilities:   
Advances for construction271
 300
Deferred income taxes, net1,551
 2,596
Deferred investment tax credits22
 23
Regulatory liabilities1,664
 403
Accrued pension expense384
 419
Accrued postretirement benefit expense40
 87
Other66
 67
Total regulatory and other long-term liabilities3,998
 3,895
Contributions in aid of construction1,276
 1,218
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 15)

 

TOTAL CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES$19,482
 $18,482
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements. 

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In millions, except per share data)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Operating revenues$3,357
 $3,302
 $3,159
Operating expenses:     
Operation and maintenance1,378
 1,504
 1,404
Depreciation and amortization492
 470
 440
General taxes259
 258
 243
Gain on asset dispositions and purchases(16) (10) (3)
Total operating expenses, net2,113
 2,222
 2,084
Operating income1,244
 1,080
 1,075
Other income (expense):     
Interest, net(342) (325) (308)
Loss on early extinguishment of debt(7) 
 
Other, net17
 15
 15
Total other income (expense)(332) (310) (293)
Income before income taxes912
 770
 782
Provision for income taxes486
 302
 306
Net income attributable to common stockholders$426
 $468
 $476
Basic earnings per share: (a)
     
Net income attributable to common stockholders$2.39
 $2.63
 $2.66
Diluted earnings per share: (a)
     
Net income attributable to common stockholders$2.38
 $2.62
 $2.64
Weighted-average common shares outstanding:     
Basic178
 178
 179
Diluted179
 179
 180
Dividends declared per common share$1.66
 $1.50
 $1.36
(a) Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.     
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
ASSETS
Property, plant and equipment$29,736 $27,413 
Accumulated depreciation(6,513)(6,329)
Property, plant and equipment, net23,223 21,084 
Current assets:  
Cash and cash equivalents85 116 
Restricted funds32 20 
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for uncollectible accounts of $60 and $75, respectively334 271 
Income tax receivable114 
Unbilled revenues275 248 
Materials and supplies98 57 
Assets held for sale— 683 
Other312 155 
Total current assets1,250 1,554 
Regulatory and other long-term assets:  
Regulatory assets990 1,051 
Seller promissory note from the sale of the Homeowner Services Group720 720 
Operating lease right-of-use assets82 92 
Goodwill1,143 1,139 
Postretirement benefit assets— 193 
Other379 242 
Total regulatory and other long-term assets3,314 3,437 
Total assets$27,787 $26,075 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

79



American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In millions, except share and per share data)
December 31, 2022December 31, 2021
CAPITALIZATION AND LIABILITIES
Capitalization:  
Common stock ($0.01 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; 187,200,539 and 186,880,413 shares issued, respectively)$$
Paid-in-capital6,824 6,781 
Retained earnings1,267 925 
Accumulated other comprehensive loss(23)(45)
Treasury stock, at cost (5,342,477 and 5,269,324 shares, respectively)(377)(365)
Total common shareholders' equity7,693 7,298 
Long-term debt10,926 10,341 
Redeemable preferred stock at redemption value
Total long-term debt10,929 10,344 
Total capitalization18,622 17,642 
Current liabilities:  
Short-term debt1,175 584 
Current portion of long-term debt281 57 
Accounts payable254 235 
Accrued liabilities706 701 
Accrued taxes49 176 
Accrued interest91 88 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale— 83 
Other255 217 
Total current liabilities2,811 2,141 
Regulatory and other long-term liabilities:  
Advances for construction316 284 
Deferred income taxes and investment tax credits2,437 2,421 
Regulatory liabilities1,590 1,600 
Operating lease liabilities70 80 
Accrued pension expense235 285 
Other202 180 
Total regulatory and other long-term liabilities4,850 4,850 
Contributions in aid of construction1,504 1,442 
Commitments and contingencies (See Note 16)
Total capitalization and liabilities$27,787 $26,075 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements. 
80

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In millions, except per share data)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Operating revenues$3,792 $3,930 $3,777 
Operating expenses:   
Operation and maintenance1,589 1,777 1,622 
Depreciation and amortization649 636 604 
General taxes281 321 303 
Total operating expenses, net2,519 2,734 2,529 
Operating income1,273 1,196 1,248 
Other income (expense):   
Interest expense(433)(403)(397)
Interest income52 
Non-operating benefit costs, net77 78 49 
Gain on sale of businesses19 747 — 
Other, net20 18 22 
Total other income (expense)(265)444 (324)
Income before income taxes1,008 1,640 924 
Provision for income taxes188 377 215 
Net income attributable to common shareholders$820 $1,263 $709 
Basic earnings per share: (a)
   
Net income attributable to common shareholders$4.51 $6.96 $3.91 
Diluted earnings per share: (a)
   
Net income attributable to common shareholders$4.51 $6.95 $3.91 
Weighted average common shares outstanding:   
Basic182 182 181 
Diluted182 182 182 
(a)Amounts may not calculate due to rounding.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.
81

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(In millions)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
Net income attributable to common stockholders$426
 $468
 $476
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:     
Change in employee benefit plan funded status, net of tax of $2, $(14) and $(6) in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively7
 (21) (10)
Pension amortized to periodic benefit cost:     
Actuarial loss, net of tax of $5, $4 and $3 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively7
 6
 5
Foreign currency translation adjustment(1) 
 (1)
Unrealized (loss) gain on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(4), $10 and $0 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively(6) 17
 
Net other comprehensive income (loss)7
 2
 (6)
Comprehensive income attributable to common stockholders$433
 $470
 $470
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
Net income attributable to common shareholders$820 $1,263 $709 
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:   
Change in employee benefit plan funded status, net of tax of $5, $0 and $(4) in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively14 (1)(12)
Defined benefit pension plan actuarial loss, net of tax of $1, $1 and $1 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively
Unrealized gain (loss) on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $1, $1 and $(1) in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively(4)
Net other comprehensive income (loss)22 (13)
Comprehensive income attributable to common shareholders$842 $1,267 $696 
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.



82

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In millions)
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 202220212020
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES   
Net income$820 $1,263 $709 
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash flows provided by operating activities:   
Depreciation and amortization649 636 604 
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits80 230 207 
Provision for losses on accounts receivable24 37 34 
(Gain) or loss on sale of businesses(19)(747)— 
Pension and non-pension postretirement benefits(47)(41)(14)
Other non-cash, net(23)(20)
Changes in assets and liabilities:   
Receivables and unbilled revenues(114)(74)(97)
Income tax receivable(110)21 (3)
Pension and non-pension postretirement benefit contributions(51)(40)(39)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities(8)66 (2)
Accrued taxes(118)129 
Other assets and liabilities, net(5)(16)44 
Net cash provided by operating activities1,108 1,441 1,426 
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES   
Capital expenditures(2,297)(1,764)(1,822)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(315)(135)(135)
Proceeds from sale of assets, net of cash on hand608 472 
Removal costs from property, plant and equipment retirements, net(123)(109)(106)
Net cash used in investing activities(2,127)(1,536)(2,061)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES   
Proceeds from long-term debt822 1,118 1,334 
Repayments of long-term debt(15)(372)(342)
(Repayments of) proceeds from term loan— (500)500 
Net short-term borrowings (repayments) with maturities less than three months591 (198)(5)
Advances and contributions in aid of construction, net of refunds of $19, $25 and $24 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively74 62 28 
Debt issuance costs and make-whole premium on early debt redemption(7)(26)(15)
Dividends paid(467)(428)(389)
Other, net(1)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities1,000 (345)1,120 
Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted funds(19)(440)485 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted funds at beginning of period136 576 91 
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted funds at end of period$117 $136 $576 
Cash paid during the year for:   
Interest, net of capitalized amount$414 $389 $382 
Income taxes, net of refunds of $2, $6 and $2 in 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively$335 $$
Non-cash investing activity:   
Capital expenditures acquired on account but unpaid as of year end$330 $292 $221 
Seller promissory note from the sale of the Homeowner Services Group$— $720 $— 
Contingent cash payment from the sale of the Homeowner Services Group$— $75 $— 
 For the Years Ended December 31,
 2017 2016 2015
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES     
Net income$426
 $468
 $476
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash flows provided by operating activities:     
Depreciation and amortization492
 470
 440
Deferred income taxes and amortization of investment tax credits462
 295
 312
Provision for losses on accounts receivable29
 27
 32
Gain on asset dispositions and purchases(16) (10) (3)
Pension and non-pension postretirement benefits57
 54
 61
Other non-cash, net(54) (36) (53)
Changes in assets and liabilities:     
Receivables and unbilled revenues21
 (31) (84)
Pension and non-pension postretirement benefit contributions(48) (53) (57)
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities38
 60
 80
Other assets and liabilities, net64
 (20) (9)
Impact of Freedom Industries settlement activities(22) 65
 
Net cash provided by operating activities1,449
 1,289
 1,195
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES     
Capital expenditures(1,434) (1,311) (1,160)
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired(177) (204) (197)
Proceeds from sale of assets and securities15
 9
 5
Removal costs from property, plant and equipment retirements, net(76) (84) (107)
Net cash used in investing activities(1,672) (1,590) (1,459)
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES     
Proceeds from long-term debt1,395
 553
 565
Repayments of long-term debt(896) (144) (132)
Proceeds from short-term borrowings with maturities greater than three months
 
 60
Repayments of short-term borrowings with maturities greater than three months
 
 (60)
Net short-term borrowings with maturities less than three months55
 221
 180
Proceeds from issuances of employee stock plans and direct stock purchase plan26
 26
 39
Advances and contributions for construction, net of refunds of $22, $31 and $23 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively28
 16
 26
Debt issuance costs(13) (5) (7)
Make-whole premium on early debt redemption(34) 
 
Dividends paid(289) (261) (239)
Anti-dilutive share repurchases(54) (65) (126)
Taxes paid related to employee stock plans(11) (13) (16)
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities207
 328
 290
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted funds(16) 27
 26
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted funds at beginning of period99
 72
 46
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted funds at end of period$83
 $99
 $72
Cash paid during the year for:     
Interest, net of capitalized amount$338
 $327
 $309
Income taxes, net of refunds of $0, $0 and $1 in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively$30
 $16
 $12
Non-cash investing activity:     
Capital expenditures acquired on account but unpaid as of year end$204
 $171
 $224
Acquisition financed by treasury stock$33
 $
 $
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

83

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’Shareholders’ Equity
(In millions)millions, except per share data)
Common Stock Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)Accumulated Other Comprehensive LossTreasury StockTotal Shareholders' Equity
 SharesPar ValuePaid-in CapitalSharesAt Cost
Balance as of December 31, 2019185.9 $$6,700 $(207)$(36)(5.1)$(338)$6,121 
Net income attributable to common shareholders— — — 709 — — — 709 
Common stock issuances (a)0.6 — 47 — — (0.1)(10)37 
Net other comprehensive income— — — — (13)— — (13)
Dividends ($2.20 declared per common share)— — — (400)— — — (400)
Balance as of December 31, 2020186.5 $$6,747 $102 $(49)(5.2)$(348)$6,454 
Net income attributable to common shareholders— — — 1,263 — — — 1,263 
Common stock issuances (a)0.4 — 34 — — (0.1)(17)17 
Net other comprehensive income— — — — — — 
Dividends ($2.41 declared per common share)— — — (440)— — — (440)
Balance as of December 31, 2021186.9 $$6,781 $925 $(45)(5.3)$(365)$7,298 
Net income attributable to common shareholders— — — 820 — — — 820 
Common stock issuances (a)0.5 — 43 — — (0.1)(12)31 
Net other comprehensive income— — — — 22 — — 22 
Dividends ($2.62 declared per common share)— — — (478)— — — (478)
Balance as of December 31, 2022187.4 $$6,824 $1,267 $(23)(5.4)$(377)$7,693 
  Common Stock     Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Treasury Stock Total Stockholders' Equity
  Shares Par Value Paid-in Capital Accumulated Deficit  Shares At Cost 
Balance as of December 31, 2014 179.5
 $2
 $6,302
 $(1,296) $(82) (0.2) $(11) $4,915
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
 
 (8) 
 
 
 (8)
Net income attributable to common stockholders 
 
 
 476
 
 
 
 476
Direct stock reinvestment and purchase plan 0.1
 
 4
 
 
 
 
 4
Employee stock purchase plan 0.1
 
 5
 
 
 
 
 5
Stock-based compensation activity 1.2
 
 40
 (1) 
 (0.1) (6) 33
Repurchases of common stock 
 
 
 
 
 (2.3) (126) (126)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) 
 
 
 
 (6) 
 
 (6)
Dividends 
 
 
 (244) 
 
 
 (244)
Balance as of December 31, 2015 180.9
 $2
 $6,351
 $(1,073) $(88) (2.6) $(143) $5,049
Net income attributable to common stockholders 
 
 
 468
 
 
 
 468
Direct stock reinvestment and purchase plan 0.1
 
 5
 
 
 
 
 5
Employee stock purchase plan 0.1
 
 7
 
 
 
 
 7
Stock-based compensation activity 0.7
 
 25
 (1) 
 (0.1) (5) 19
Repurchases of common stock 
 
 
 
 
 (1.0) (65) (65)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) 
 
 
 
 2
 
 
 2
Dividends 
 
 
 (267) 
 
 
 (267)
Balance as of December 31, 2016 181.8
 $2
 $6,388
 $(873) $(86) (3.7) $(213) $5,218
Cumulative effect of change in accounting principle 
 
 
 21
 
 
 
 21
Net income attributable to common stockholders 
 
 
 426
 
 
 
 426
Direct stock reinvestment and purchase plan 0.1
 
 8
 
 
 
 
 8
Employee stock purchase plan 0.1
 
 7
 
 
 
 
 7
Stock-based compensation activity 0.5
 
 22
 
 
 (0.1) (7) 15
Acquisitions via treasury stock 
 
 7
 
 
 0.4
 27
 34
Repurchases of common stock 
 
 
 
 
 (0.7) (54) (54)
Net other comprehensive income (loss) 
 
 
 
 7
 
 
 7
Dividends 
 
 
 (297) 
 
 
 (297)
Balance as of December 31, 2017 182.5
 $2
 $6,432
 $(723) $(79) (4.1) $(247) $5,385
(a)Includes stock-based compensation, employee stock purchase plan and direct stock reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan activity.
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these Consolidated Financial Statements.

84

American Water Works Company, Inc. and Subsidiary Companies
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unless otherwise noted, in millions, except per share data)
Note 1: Organization and Operation
American Water Works Company, Inc. (the “Company” or “American Water”) is thea holding company for regulated and market-based subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services throughout the United States and Ontario, Canada.States. References to “parent company” mean American Water Works Company, Inc., without its subsidiaries. The Company’s primary business involves the ownership of regulated utilities that provide water and wastewater services in 1614 states in the United States, collectively referred to as the “Regulated Businesses.” The Company also operates other market-based businesses that provide water and wastewater services within four, non-reportable operating segments, collectively referred to as the “Market-Based Businesses.presented throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K within “Other.TheseThe Company’s primary market-based businesses includeincluded within Other are the Military Services Group (“MSG”), which conducts operation and maintenance (“O&M”) ofenters into long-term contracts with the U.S. government to provide water and wastewater systemsservices on various military bases;installations; and the former Homeowner Services Group which primarily provides water and sewer line protection plans for homeowners; the Contract Operations Group, which conducts O&M of water and wastewater facilities for municipalities and industrial customers; and Keystone Clearwater Solutions, LLC (“Keystone”HOS”), which provides waterwas sold on December 9, 2021, and provided various warranty protection programs and other home services for natural gas exploration and production companies.to residential customers.
Note 2: Significant Accounting Policies
Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of American Water and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained after the elimination of intercompany balances and transactions. The Company uses the equity method to report its investments in joint ventures where it holds up to a 50% voting interest and cannot exercise control over the operations and policies of the investments. Under the equity method, the Company records its interests as an investment and its percentage share of the investee’s earnings as income or losses.
In July 2015, the Company acquired a 95% interest in Water Solutions Holdings, LLC, including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Keystone Clearwater Solutions, LLC (collectively referred to as “Keystone”). The outside stockholders’ interest, which is redeemable at the option of the minority owners, is recognized as redeemable noncontrolling interest. The redeemable noncontrolling interest amounted to $7 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, and is included in other long-term liabilities in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. The net income in 2017 and the net loss in 2016, respectively, attributable to the noncontrolling interest was not significant. The Company has entered into an agreement whereby it has the option to acquire from the minority owners, and the minority owners have the option to sell to the Company, the remaining five percent interest at fair value, upon the occurrence of certain triggering events, or at the defined date of December 31, 2018.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Actual results could differ from these estimates, judgments and assumptions. The Company considers its critical accounting estimates to include: the application of regulatory accounting principles and the related determination and estimation of regulatory assets and liabilities; assumptions used in impairment testing of goodwill and other long-lived assets, including regulatory assets; revenue recognition and the estimates used in the calculation of unbilled revenue; accounting for income taxes and the recently enacted Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJA”); benefit plan assumptions; and the judgments and estimates used in the determining loss contingencies. The Company’s critical accounting estimates that are particularly sensitive to change in the near term are amounts reported for regulatory assets and liabilities, goodwill, income taxes, benefit plan assumptions and contingency-related obligations.
Regulation
The Company’s regulated utilities are subject to economic regulation by certainmultiple state utility commissions or other entities engaged in utility regulation, collectively referred to as Public Utility Commissions (“PUCs” or “Regulators”). As such, the Company follows authoritative accounting principles required for rate regulated utilities, which requires the effects of rate regulation to be reflected in the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements. PUCs generally authorize revenue at levels intended to recover the estimated costs of providing service, plus a return on net investments, or rate base. Regulators may also approve accounting treatments, long-term financing programs and cost of capital, operation and maintenance (“O&M”) expenses, capital expenditures, O&M expenses, taxes, affiliated transactions and affiliate relationships, reorganizations, mergers, acquisitions and mergers, and acquisitions,dispositions, along with imposing certain penalties or granting certain incentives. Due to timing and other differences in the collection of a regulated utility’s revenue, an incurredrevenues, these authoritative accounting principles allow a cost that would otherwise be charged as an expense by a non-regulated entity, couldto be deferred as a regulatory asset if it is probable that such cost is recoverable through future rates. Conversely, the authoritative accountingthese principles also require the creation of a regulatory liability for amounts collected in rates to recover costs expected to be incurred in the future, or amounts collected in excess of costs incurred and are refundable to customers. See Note 6—3—Regulatory AssetsMatters for additional information.
Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) requires that management make estimates, assumptions and Liabilities.judgments that could affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations and cash flows. Actual results could differ from these estimates, assumptions and judgments. The Company considers its critical accounting estimates to include (i) the application of regulatory accounting principles and the related determination and estimation of regulatory assets and liabilities, (ii) revenue recognition and the estimates used in the calculation of unbilled revenue, (iii) accounting for income taxes, (iv) benefit plan assumptions and (v) the estimates and judgments used in determining loss contingencies. The Company’s critical accounting estimates that are particularly sensitive to change in the near term are amounts reported for regulatory assets and liabilities, income taxes, benefit plan assumptions and contingency-related obligations.

Principles of Consolidation
The accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of American Water and all of its subsidiaries in which a controlling interest is maintained after the elimination of intercompany balances and transactions.
Property, Plant and Equipment
Property, plant and equipment consists primarily of utility plant.plant utilized by the Company’s regulated utilities. Additions to utility plant and replacement of retirement units of utility plant are capitalized and include costs such as materials, direct labor, payroll taxes and benefits, indirect items such as engineering and supervision, transportation and an allowance for funds used during construction (“AFUDC”). Costs for repair, maintenance and minor replacements are charged to O&M expense as incurred.
The cost of property,utility plant and equipment is depreciated using the straight-line average remaining life, group method. The Company’s regulated utilities record depreciation in conformity with amounts approved by PUCs, after regulatory review of the information the Company submits to support its estimates of the assets’ remaining useful lives.
85

Nonutility property consists primarily of buildings and equipment utilized by the Company’s MSG business and for internal operations. This property is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, which is calculated using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets.
When units of property, plant and equipment are replaced, retired or abandoned, the carrying value is credited against the asset and charged to accumulated depreciation. To the extent the Company recovers cost of removal or other retirement costs through rates after the retirement costs are incurred, a regulatory asset is recorded. In some cases, the Company recovers retirement costs through rates during the life of the associated asset and before the costs are incurred. These amounts result in a regulatory liability being reported based on the amounts previously recovered through customer rates, until the costs to retire those assets are incurred.
The costs incurred to acquire and internally develop computer software for internal use are capitalized as a unit of property. The carrying value of these costs amounted to $346$369 million and $345$374 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively.
Nonutility property consists primarily of buildings and equipment utilized by the Company for internal operations. This property is stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation, which calculated using the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets.
Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Funds
Substantially all cash is invested in interest-bearing accounts. All highly liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less when purchased are considered to be cash equivalents.
Restricted funds consistsconsist primarily of proceeds from financings for the construction and capital improvement of facilities, and deposits for future services under O&M projects. Proceeds are held in escrow or interest-bearing accounts until the designated expenditures are incurred. Restricted funds are classified inon the Consolidated Balance Sheets as either current or long-term based upon the intended use of the funds.
The following table provides a reconciliation of the cash and cash equivalents, and restricted funds as presented in the Consolidated Balance Sheets, to the sum of such amounts presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31:
 2017 2016
Cash and cash equivalents$55
 $75
Restricted funds27
 20
Restricted funds included in other long-term assets1
 4
Cash and cash equivalents, and restricted funds as presented in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows$83
 $99
Accounts Receivable and Unbilled Revenues
Accounts receivable include regulated utility customer accounts receivable, which represent amounts billed to water and wastewater customers generally on a cyclemonthly basis. Credit is extended based on the guidelines of the applicable PUCs and collateral is generally not required. Also included are market-based trade accounts receivable and nonutility customer receivables of the regulated subsidiaries. Unbilled revenues are accrued when service has been provided but has not been billed to customers and when costs exceed billings on market-based construction contracts.
Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
Allowances for uncollectible accounts are maintained for estimated probable losses resulting from the Company’s inability to collect receivables from customers. Accounts that are outstanding longer than the payment terms are considered past due. A number of factors are considered in determining the allowance for uncollectible accounts, including the length of time receivables are past due, and previous loss history.history, current economic and societal conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of receivables from customers. The Company generally writes off accounts when they become uncollectible or are over a certain number of days outstanding. See Note 5—7—Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts.

Accounts for additional information.
Materials and Supplies
Materials and supplies are stated at the lower of cost or net realizable value. Cost is determined using the average cost method.
Seller Promissory Note
The Company’s seller promissory note is accounted for under Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310, Receivables, and is classified as held for investment and accounted for at amortized cost at the present value of consideration received for the sale of its HOS business. Interest income from the seller promissory note is accrued based on the principal amount outstanding and earned over the contractual life of the loan.
Leases
The Company has operating and finance leases involving real property, including facilities, utility assets, vehicles, and equipment. The Company determines if an arrangement is a lease at inception. Operating leases are included in operating lease right-of-use (“ROU”) assets, accrued liabilities and operating lease liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Finance leases are included in property, plant and equipment, accrued liabilities and other long-term liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has made an accounting policy election not to include operating leases with a lease term of twelve months or less.
86

ROU assets represent the right to use an underlying asset for the lease term and the lease liabilities represent the obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. ROU assets and lease liabilities are generally recognized at the commencement date based on the present value of discounted lease payments over the lease term. As most of the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate, the Company uses its incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of discounted lease payments. The implicit rate is used when readily determinable. ROU assets also include any upfront lease payments and excludes lease incentives. The Company’s lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that the option will be exercised. Lease expense is recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term.
The Company has lease agreements with lease components (e.g., fixed payments including rent, real estate taxes and insurance costs) and non-lease components (e.g., common-area maintenance costs), which are generally accounted for separately; however, the Company accounts for the lease and non-lease components as a single lease component for certain leases. Certain lease agreements include variable rental payments adjusted periodically for inflation. Additionally, the Company applies a portfolio approach to effectively account for the ROU assets and lease liabilities. The Company’s lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of the purchase price paid over the estimated fair value of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the acquisition of a business. Goodwill is not amortized butand must be allocated at the reporting unit level, which is defined as an operating segment or one level below, and tested for impairment at least annually, or on an interim basismore frequently if an event occurs or circumstances change that would more likely than not, reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying value. Goodwill
The Company’s goodwill is primarily associated with the acquisition of American Water by an affiliate of the Company by RWE AktiengesellschaftCompany’s previous owner in 2003 and the acquisition of Keystone in 2015, and has been assignedallocated to reporting units based on the fair values at the date of the acquisitions. TheFor purposes of testing goodwill for impairment, the reporting units in the Regulated Businesses segment are aggregated into a single reporting unit. The Market-Based Businessesgoodwill of Other is comprised of four non-reportablethe MSG reporting units. unit.
The Company’s annual impairment testtesting is performed as of November 30 of each year, in conjunction with the completion of the Company’s annual business plan.year. The Company assesses qualitative factors to determine whether quantitative testing is necessary. If it is necessary to perform the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. Ifdetermined, based onupon qualitative factors, that the estimated fair value of thea reporting unit is, more likely than not, greater than theits carrying amount,value, no further testing is required. If the Company bypasses the qualitative assessment or performs the qualitative assessment butand determines that itthe estimated fair value of a reporting unit, is more likely than not, that its fair value is less than its carrying amount,value, a quantitative, two-step, fair value-based testassessment is performed.
The first step This quantitative testing compares the estimated fair value of the reporting unit to its respective net carrying value, including goodwill, on the measurement date. IfAn impairment loss will be recognized in the estimated fair valueamount equal to the excess of any reporting unit is less than suchthe reporting unit’s carrying value thencompared to its estimated fair value, limited to the second step is performed to measure thetotal amount of the impairment loss (if any) for suchgoodwill allocated to that reporting unit.
The second step requires an allocation of fair value to the individual assets and liabilities using purchase price allocation accounting guidance in order to determine the implied fair value of goodwill. If the implied fair valueApplication of goodwill is less than the carrying amount for the reporting unit, an impairment loss is recorded as a reduction to goodwill and a charge to operating expense. Application of the goodwill impairment testtesting requires management judgment, including the identification of reporting units and determining the fair value of the reporting unit.units. Management estimates fair value using a combination of a discounted cash flow analysis and market multiples analysis. Significant assumptions used in these fair value analysesestimations include, but are not limited to, forecasts of future operating results, discount rate and growth rates and projected terminal values.rate.
The Company believes the assumptions and other considerations used to value goodwill to be appropriate. However,appropriate, however, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and considerations used in its analysis, the resulting change could have a material adverse impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements. See Note 7—8—Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets.Assets for additional information.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets, other than goodwill, include land, buildings,property, plant and equipment and long-term investments. Long-livedThe Company evaluates long-lived assets other than investments and land, are depreciated over their estimated useful lives, and are reviewed for impairment whenever changes inwhen circumstances indicate the carrying value of those assets may not be recoverable. The Company determines if long-lived assets are potentially impaired by comparing the undiscounted expected future cash flows to the carrying value when indicators of impairment exist. When the undiscounted cash flow analysis indicates a long-lived asset may not be recoverable. Such circumstances would include items such as a significant decrease inrecoverable, the market valueamount of a long-lived asset, a significant adverse change in the manner the asset is being used or planned to be used or in its physical condition, or a history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset. In addition, changes in the expected useful life of these long-lived assets may also be an impairment indicator. When such events or changes occur, the Company estimates the fair value of the asset from future cash flows expected to result from the use and, if applicable, the eventual disposition of the asset and compares that to the carrying value of the asset. If the carrying value is greater than the fair value, an impairment loss is recorded.
The Company believesdetermined by measuring the assumptions and other considerations used to evaluateexcess of the carrying valueamount of the long-lived assets are appropriate. However, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and considerations used in its estimates, the resulting change could have a material adverse impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements.
The key variables to determine fair value include assumptions regarding sales volume, rates, operating costs, labor and other benefit costs, capital additions, assumed discount rates and other economic factors. These variables require significant management judgment and include inherent uncertainties, since they are forecasting future events. If such assets are considered impaired, an impairment loss is recognized equal to the amount by which the asset’s carrying value exceedsasset or asset group over its fair value.
The long-lived assets of the Company’s regulated utility subsidiariesutilities are testedgrouped on a separate entity basis for impairment testing, as they are integrated state-wide operations that do not have the option to curtail service and generally have uniform tariffs. A regulatory asset is charged to earnings if and when future recovery in rates of that asset is no longer probable.
The Company holdsbelieves the assumptions and other investments including investmentsconsiderations used to value long-lived assets to be appropriate, however, if actual experience differs from the assumptions and considerations used in privately held companies and investments in joint ventures accounted for usingits estimates, the equity method. The Company’s investments in privately held companies and joint ventures are classified as other long-term assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The fair values of long-term investments are dependentresulting change could have a material adverse impact on the financial performance and solvencyConsolidated Financial Statements.
87

Advances for Construction and Contributions in Aid of Construction
Regulated utility subsidiaries may receive advances for construction and contributions in aid of construction from customers, home builders and real estate developers to fund construction necessary to extend service to new areas.
Advances are refundable for limited periods of time as new customers begin to receive service or other contractual obligations are fulfilled. Included in other current liabilities as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016 in2021 on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets are estimated refunds of $19 million and $23 million, and $21 million, respectively. ThoseThese amounts represent expected refunds during the next 12-month period.
Advances that are no longer refundable are reclassified to contributions. Contributions are permanent collections of plant assets or cash for a particular construction project. For ratemaking purposes, the amount of such contributions generally serves as a rate base reduction since the contributions represent non-investor supplied funds.
Generally, the Company depreciates utility plant funded by contributions and amortizes its contributions balance as a reduction to depreciation expense, producing a result which is functionally equivalent to reducing the original cost of the utility plant for the contributions. In accordance with applicable regulatory guidelines, some of the Company’s utility subsidiaries do not amortize contributions, and any contribution received remains on the balance sheet indefinitely. Amortization of contributions in aid of construction was $27$37 million, $27$36 million and $26$32 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively.
Revenue Recognition
Under ASC Topic 606, Revenue From Contracts With Customers, andall related amendments (collectively, “ASC 606”), a performance obligation is a promise within a contract to transfer a distinct good or service, or a series of Revenues
Revenuesdistinct goods and services, to a customer. Revenue is recognized when performance obligations are satisfied and the customer obtains control of promised goods or services. The amount of revenue recognized reflects the consideration to which the Company expects to be entitled to receive in exchange for goods or services. Under ASC 606, a contract’s transaction price is allocated to each distinct performance obligation. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that the Company determines are within the scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps: (i) identifies the contracts with a customer; (ii) identifies the performance obligations within the contract, including whether any performance obligations are distinct and capable of being distinct in the context of the regulated utility subsidiariescontract; (iii) determines the transaction price; (iv) allocates the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and (v) recognizes revenue when, or as, the Company satisfies each performance obligation.
The Company’s revenues from contracts with customers are recognizeddiscussed below. Customer payments for contracts are generally due within 30 days of billing and none of the contracts with customers have payment terms that exceed one year; therefore, the Company elected to apply the significant financing component practical expedient and no amount of consideration has been allocated as a financing component.
Regulated Businesses Revenue
Revenue from the Company’s Regulated Businesses is generated primarily from water and wastewater services delivered to customers. These contracts contain a single performance obligation, the delivery of water and/or wastewater services, as the promise to transfer the individual good or service is not separately identifiable from other promises within the contracts and, therefore, is not distinct. Revenues are provided, andrecognized over time, as services are provided. There are generally no significant financing components or variable consideration. Revenues include amounts billed to customers on a cycle basis and unbilled amounts calculated based on estimated usage from the date of the meter reading associated with the latest customer bill, to the end of the accounting period. The amounts that the Company has a right to invoice are determined by each customer’s actual usage, an indicator that the invoice amount corresponds directly to the value transferred to the customer. The Company also recognizes revenue when it is probable that future recovery of previously incurred costs or future refunds that are to be credited to customers will occur through the ratemaking process.
88

Other Revenue
The Company has agreements with the U.S. governmentlong-term, fixed fee contracts to operate and maintain water and wastewater systems atfor the U.S. government on various military bases pursuant to 50-year contracts (“military agreements”). These contracts also include construction components that are accountedinstallations and facilities owned by municipal customers. Billing and revenue recognition for separately from the O&M components. Ninefixed fee revenues occurs ratably over the term of the military agreements are subject to periodic price redetermination adjustmentscontract, as customers simultaneously receive and modifications for changes in circumstance. The remaining four agreements are subject to annual price adjustments under a mechanism similar to price redeterminations.consume the benefits provided by the Company. Additionally, these contracts allow the Company to make capital improvements to underlying infrastructure, which are initiated through separate modifications or amendments to the original contract, whereby stand-alone, fixed pricing is separately stated for each improvement. The Company has agreements ranging in length from one to 25 yearsdetermined that these capital improvements are separate performance obligations, with municipalities and businesses in various industries to operate and maintain water and wastewater systems (“O&M agreements”). Revenues from operations and management services are recognized as services are provided. See Note 15—Commitments and Contingencies.
Revenues from construction projects arerevenue recognized over the contract termtime based on performance completed at the costs incurred to date during the period compared to the total estimated costs over the entire contract.end of each reporting period. Losses on contracts are recognized during the period in which the losslosses first becomesbecome probable and estimable. Revenues recognized during the period in excess of billings on construction contracts are recorded as unbilled revenue. Billingsrevenues, with billings in excess of revenues recognized on construction contracts are recorded as other current liabilities until the recognition criteria are met. Changes in contract performance and related estimated contract profitability may result in revisions to costs and revenues and are recognized in the period in which revisions are determined. See Note 4—Revenue Recognition for additional information.
Prior to December 9, 2021, through various warranty protection programs and other home services, the Company previously provided fixed fee services to residential customers for interior and exterior water and sewer lines, interior electric and gas lines, heating and cooling systems, water heaters and other home appliances, as well as power surge protection and other related services through its former HOS business. Most of the contracts had a one-year term and each service was a separate performance obligation, satisfied over time, as the customers simultaneously received and consumed the benefits provided from the service. Customers were obligated to pay for the protection programs ratably over 12 months or via a one-time, annual fee, with revenues recognized ratably over time for those services. Advances from customers were deferred until the performance obligation was satisfied.
Income Taxes
American WaterThe Company and its subsidiaries participate in a consolidated federal income tax return for U.S. tax purposes. Members of the consolidated group are charged with the amount of federal income tax expense determined as if they filed separate returns.
Certain income and expense items are accounted for in different time periods for financial reporting than for income tax reporting purposes. The Company provides deferred income taxes on the difference between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the amounts at which they are carried in the financial statements. These deferred income taxes are based on the enacted tax rates expected to be in effect when these temporary differences are projected to reverse. In addition, the regulated utility subsidiaries recognize regulatory assets and liabilities for the effect on revenues expected to be realized as the tax effects of temporary differences, previously flowed through to customers, reverse.
Investment tax credits have been deferred by the regulated utility subsidiaries and are being amortized to income over the average estimated service lives of the related assets.

The Company recognizes accrued interest and penalties related to tax positions as a component of income tax expense and accounts for sales tax collected from customers and remitted to taxing authorities on a net basis. See Note 13—14—Income Taxes.Taxes for additional information.
Allowance for Funds Used During Construction
AFUDC is a non-cash credit to income with a corresponding charge to utility plant that represents the cost of borrowed funds or a return on equity funds devoted to plant under construction. The regulated utility subsidiaries record AFUDC to the extent permitted by the PUCs. The portion of AFUDC attributable to borrowed funds is shown as a reduction of interest, net inon the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Any portion of AFUDC attributable to equity funds would be included in other, income (expenses) innet on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. AFUDC is summarizedPresented in the following table below is AFUDC for the years ended December 31:
 2017 2016 2015
Allowance for other funds used during construction$19
 $15
 $13
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction8
 6
 8
Environmental Costs
The Company’s water and wastewater operations and the operations of its Market-Based Businesses are subject to U.S. federal, state, local and foreign requirements relating to environmental protection, and as such, the Company periodically becomes subject to environmental claims in the normal course of business. Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations or provide a future benefit are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Remediation costs that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations are accrued, on an undiscounted basis, when it is probable that these costs will be incurred and can be reasonably estimated. A conservation agreement entered into by a subsidiary of the Company with the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration in 2010 and amended in 2017 required the Company to, among other provisions, implement certain measures to protect the steelhead trout and its habitat in the Carmel River watershed in the State of California. The Company agreed to pay $1 million annually commencing in 2010 with the final payment being made in 2021. Remediation costs accrued amounted to $6 million and less than $1 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
 202220212020
Allowance for other funds used during construction$20 $27 $30 
Allowance for borrowed funds used during construction14 10 13 
Derivative Financial Instruments
The Company uses derivative financial instruments primarily for purposes of hedging exposures to fluctuations in interest rates. These derivative contracts are entered into for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures and do not constitute positions independent of those exposures. The Company does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments.
89

All derivatives are recognized on the balance sheet at fair value. On the date the derivative contract is entered into, the Company may designatedesignates the derivative as a hedge of the fair value of a recognized asset or liability (fair-value hedge) or a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability (cash-flow hedge).
Changes in the fair value of a fair-value hedge, along with the gain or loss on the underlying hedged item, are recorded in current-period earnings. The gains and losses on the effective portion of cash-flow hedges are recorded in other comprehensive income, until earnings are affected by the variability of cash flows. Any ineffective portion of designated cash-flow hedges is recognized in current-period earnings.
Cash flows from derivative contracts are included in net cash provided by operating activities inon the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. See Note 11—Long-Term Debt for additional information.

Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits
The Company maintains defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for eligible employees and retirees. The plan obligation and costs of providing benefits under these plans are annually measured as of December 31. The measurement involves various factors, assumptions and accounting elections. The impact of assumption changes or experience different from that assumed on pension and other postretirement benefit obligations is recognized over time rather than immediately recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income. Cumulative gains and losses that are in excess of 10% of the greater of either the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets are amortized over the expected average remaining future service period of the current active membership for the plans, with the exception of the American Water Pension Plan for Certain Inactive Participants (“AWPP Inactive”), which is amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants. See Note 15—Employee Benefits for additional information.
The Company’s policy is to recognize curtailments when the total expected future service of plan participants is reduced by greater than 10% due to an event that results in terminations and/or retirements.
New Accounting Standards
The following recently issuedPresented in the table below are new accounting standards have beenthat were adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2017:
in 2022:
StandardDescription
Date of
Adoption
Application
Effect on the Consolidated
Financial Statements
(or Other Significant Matters)
Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity
Simplification of Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting

financial reporting associated with accounting for convertible instruments and contracts in an entity’s own equity. The standard reduced the number of accounting models for convertible debt instruments and convertible preferred stock. This will result in fewer embedded conversion features being separately recognized from the host contract. Earnings per share (“EPS”) calculations have been simplified for certain instruments.
Simplified accounting and disclosure requirements for share-based payment awards. January 1, 2022
Modified retrospectiveThe updated guidance addresses simplification in areas such as: (i) the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies; (ii) the classification of excess tax benefits and taxes paidstandard did not have a material impact on the Consolidated StatementsFinancial Statements.
Disclosures by Business Entities about Government AssistanceThe amendments in this update require additional disclosures regarding government grants and contributions. These disclosures require information on the following three items about government transactions to be provided: information on the nature of Cash Flows; (iii) election of antransactions and related accounting policy used to account for forfeitures;transactions, the line items on the balance sheet and (iv)income statement affected by these transactions including amounts applicable to each line, and significant terms and conditions of the amount an employer can withhold to cover income taxestransactions, including commitments and still qualify for equity classification.

contingencies.
January 1, 20172022
Modified retrospective for the recognition of excess tax benefits and deficiencies; full retrospective for the classification of excess tax benefits and taxes paidProspective
The standard did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows


Financial Statements.
Reference Rate Reform
The cumulative effect of adoption increased retained earnings by $21 million, withThis update provides an offsetting decrease to deferred income taxes, net. Adoption also increased cash flows from operating activities and decreased cash flows from financing activities by $17 million, $13 million and $16 millionadditional two-year deferral on the sunset date for temporary relief during the years endedreference rate reform transition period. After December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively,2024, the Company will no longer be permitted to apply the relief for reference rate reform.
December 21, 2022ProspectiveThe standard did not have a material impact on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.

Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments on the Statement of Cash Flows
Provides guidance on the presentation and classification in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the following cash receipts and payments: (i) debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs; (ii) settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing; (iii) contingent consideration payments made after a business combination; (iv) proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims; (v) proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies; (vi) distributions received from equity method investees; (vii) beneficial interests in securitization transactions and (viii) separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle.

December 31, 2017Retrospective
Adoption resulted in the change in the presentation of a $34 million make-whole premium payment from operating activities to financing activities on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, as compared to the third quarter 2017 Form 10-Q. See Note 10- Long-Term Debt in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for further information regarding this make-whole premium payment.

Presentation of Changes in Restricted Cash on the Statement of Cash Flows
Updates the accounting and disclosure guidance for the classification and presentation of changes in restricted cash on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. The amended guidance requires that the statements of cash flows explain the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents and amounts described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents will now be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statements of cash flows.


December 31, 2017RetrospectiveAdoption resulted in the inclusion of restricted funds and related changes in the total of cash and cash equivalents, and restricted funds on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows. Total restricted funds amounted to $28 million, $24 million and $27 million as of December 31, 2017, 2016, 2015, respectively. The adoption also resulted in an increase in net cash used in investing activities previously reported of $3 million for the year ended December 31, 2016, and a decrease of $6 million for the year ended December 31, 2015.
The following
90

Presented in the table below are recently issued accounting standards that have not yet been adopted by the Company as of December 31, 2017:
2022:
StandardDescription
Date of
Adoption
Application
Estimated Effect on the Consolidated
Financial Statements
(or Other Significant Matters)
RevenueAccounting for Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities from Contracts with CustomersChanges the criteria for recognizing revenue from a contract with a customer. Replaces existing guidance on revenue recognition, including most industry specific guidance. The objective is to provide a single, comprehensive revenue recognition model for all contracts with customers to improve comparability within industries, across industries and across capital markets. The underlying principle is that an entity will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods and services to customers at an amount the entity expects to be entitled to in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance requires an acquirer recognize and measure contract assets and contract liabilities acquired in a business combination in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification Topic 606, as if it had originated the contracts. The amendments in this update also requiresprovide certain practical expedients for acquirers when recognizing and measuring acquired contract assets and contract liabilities from revenue contracts in a number of disclosures regarding the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and the related cash flows.business combination.January 1, 2018
Full or modified retrospective

The adoption will not result in material impact to the Consolidated Financial Statements as there are no material changes to the timing or recognition of revenue. The Company plans to adopt using the modified retrospective method.


Clarifying the Definition of a BusinessUpdated the accounting guidance to clarify the definition of a business with the objective of assisting entities with evaluating whether transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions, or disposals, of assets or businesses.January 1, 2018Prospective
The update could result in more acquisitions being accounted for as asset acquisitions. The effect on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements will be dependent on the acquisitions that close subsequent to adoption.


StandardDescription
Date of
Adoption
Application
Estimated Effect on the Consolidated
Financial Statements
(or Other Significant Matters)
Presentation of Net Periodic Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Cost

Updated authoritative guidance requires the service cost component of net periodic benefit cost to be presented in the same income statement line item(s) as other employee compensation costs arising from services rendered during the period. The remaining components of net periodic benefit cost are required to be presented separately from the service cost component in an income statement line item outside of operating income. Also, the guidance only allows for the service cost component to be eligible for capitalization. The updated guidance does not impact the accounting for net periodic benefit costs as regulatory assets or liabilities.

January 1, 2018
Retrospective for the presentation of net periodic benefit cost components in the income statement; prospective for the capitalization of net periodic benefit costs components in total assets.

The Company expects to reclassify net periodic benefit costs, other than the service cost component of approximately $9 million, $5 million and $5 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively, to Other, net in its Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company expects to record the non-service cost component probable of recovery from (or payable to) customers as a regulatory asset (or regulatory liability) accordingly.
Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
Permits entities to reclassify tax effects stranded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a result of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act to retained earnings.

January 1, 2019;2023; early adoption permitted

In the period of adoption or retrospective.

Prospective
The Company is evaluating the impact on the Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the timing of adoption.

Accounting for Leases
Updated the accounting and disclosure guidance for leasing arrangements. Under this guidance, a lessee will be required to recognize the following for all leases, excluding short-term leases, at the commencement date: (i) a lease liability, which is a lessee’s obligation to make lease payments arising from a lease, measured on a discounted basis; and (ii) a right-of-use asset, which is an asset that represents the lessee’s right to use, or control the use of, a specified asset for the lease term. Under the guidance, lessor accounting is largely unchanged.

January 1, 2019; early adoption permittedModified retrospectiveThe Company is evaluating the effect on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
Accounting for Hedging Activities

Updated the accounting and disclosure guidance for hedging activities, which allows for more financial and nonfinancial hedging strategies to be eligible for hedge accounting. Under this guidance, a qualitative effectiveness assessment is permitted for certain hedges if an entity can reasonably support an expectation of high effectiveness throughout the term of the hedge, provided that an initial quantitative test establishes that the hedge relationship is highly effective. Also, for cash flow hedges determined to be highly effective, all changes in the fair value of the hedging instrument will be recorded in other comprehensive income with a subsequent reclassification to earnings when the hedged item impacts earnings.

January 1, 2019; early adoption permitted

Modified retrospective for adjustments related to the measurement of ineffectiveness for cash flow hedges; prospective for the updated presentation and disclosure requirements.

The Company does not expect the adoption to have a material impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements based on the hedges held as of the balance sheet date. The Company is evaluating the timing of adoption.

Simplification of Goodwill Impairment Testing

Updated authoritative guidance which simplifies the subsequent measurement of goodwill by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. Under the amendments in the update, an entity should perform its annual or interim goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An impairment charge should be recognized for the amount by which the carrying value exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. An entity still has the option to perform the qualitative assessment for a reporting unit to determine if the quantitative impairment test is necessary.

January 1, 2020; early adoption permittedProspective
The Company is evaluating theany impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the timing of adoption.

MeasurementTroubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage DisclosuresThe main provisions of Credit Losses
Updatedthis standard eliminate the receivables accounting guidance on reporting credit losses for troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) by creditors while enhancing disclosure requirements when a borrower is experiencing financial assets held at amortized cost basisdifficulty. Entities must apply the loan refinancing and available-for-sale debt securities. Underrestructuring guidance for receivables to determine whether a modification results in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. Additionally, the amendments in this guidance, expected credit losses are required to be measured based on historical experience, current conditionsupdate require that an entity disclose current-period gross write-offs by year of origination for financing receivables and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectability of the reported amount of financial assets. Also, this guidance requires that credit losses on available-for-sale debt securities be presented as an allowance rather than as a direct write-down.

net investment in leases.
January 1, 2020;2023; early adoption permittedModifiedProspective, with a modified retrospective option for amendments related to the recognition and measurement of TDRs.
The Company is evaluating theany impact on its Consolidated Financial Statements, as well as the timing of adoption.

Reclassifications
Certain reclassifications have been made to prior periods in the accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements and notesNotes to conform to the current presentation.

Note 3: Regulatory Matters
General Rate Cases
Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, including reductions for the amortization of the excess accumulated deferred income taxes (“EADIT”) that are generally offset in income tax expense, assuming a constant water sales volume and customer count, resulting from general rate case authorizations that became effective during 2022:
(In millions)Effective DateAmount
General rate cases by state:
New JerseySeptember 1, 2022$46 
HawaiiJuly 1, 2022
West VirginiaFebruary 25, 202213 
California, Step IncreaseJanuary 1, 2022
Pennsylvania, Step IncreaseJanuary 1, 202220 
Total general rate case authorizations$90 
Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, including reductions for the amortization of EADIT that are generally offset in income tax expense, assuming a constant water sales volume and customer count, resulting from general rate case authorizations that became effective on or after January 1, 2023:
(In millions)Effective DateAmount
General rate cases by state:
PennsylvaniaJanuary 28, 2023$138 
IllinoisJanuary 1, 202367 
California, Step IncreaseJanuary 1, 202313 
Total general rate case authorizations$218 
91

On December 15, 2022, the Illinois Commerce Commission issued an order approving the adjustment of base rates requested in a rate case filed on February 10, 2022, by the Company’s Illinois subsidiary. As updated in the Illinois subsidiary’s June 29, 2022 rebuttal filing, the request sought $83 million in additional annualized revenues excluding previously recovered infrastructure surcharges. The general rate case order approved a $67 million annualized increase in water and wastewater system revenues excluding previously recovered infrastructure surcharges, effective January 1, 2023, based on an authorized return on equity of 9.8%, authorized rate base of $1.64 billion, a common equity ratio of 49.0% and a debt ratio of 51.0%. The annualized revenue increase is being driven primarily by significant water and wastewater system capital investments since the Illinois subsidiary’s 2017 rate case order that have been completed or are planned through December 31, 2023, expected higher pension and other postretirement benefit costs, and increases in production costs, including chemicals, fuel and power costs.
On December 8, 2022, the Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission issued an order approving the joint settlement of the rate case filed on April 29, 2022, by the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary. The general rate case order approved a $138 million annualized increase in water and wastewater revenues and authorizes implementation of the new water and wastewater rates effective January 28, 2023. The rate case proceeding was resolved through a “black box” settlement agreement and did not specify an approved return on equity (“ROE”). The annualized revenue increase is driven primarily by significant incremental capital investments since the Pennsylvania subsidiary’s 2021 rate case order that will be completed through December 31, 2023, increases in pension and other postretirement benefits expense and increases in production costs, including chemicals, fuel and power costs. The general rate case order also includes recovery of the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary’s COVID-19 deferral balance.
On August 17, 2022, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary was authorized additional annual revenues of $46 million in its general rate case, effective September 1, 2022, based on an authorized return on equity of 9.6%, authorized rate base of $4.15 billion, a common equity ratio of 54.6% and a long-term debt ratio of 45.4%. The request incorporated updated estimates of production costs, including chemicals, fuel and power costs. Beginning January 1, 2023, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary will defer as a regulatory asset or liability, as appropriate, the difference between its pension expense and other postretirement benefits expense and those amounts included in base rates. The deferral period for this regulatory asset or liability will be two years or, if earlier, will end at the conclusion of the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary’s next general rate case. The Company’s New Jersey subsidiary also withdrew its request, without prejudice, to recover its existing authorized COVID-19-related regulatory asset in the general rate case and will seek recovery in a separate proceeding within the process established in the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities’ (the “NJBPU”) generic COVID-19-related proceeding.
On February 24, 2022, the Company’s West Virginia subsidiary (“WVAWC”) was authorized additional annual revenues of $13 million in its general rate case, effective February 25, 2022, based on an authorized return on equity of 9.8%, authorized rate base of $734 million and a common equity ratio of 47.9%. Staff of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia moved for reconsideration of the final order on several grounds. WVAWC filed its response to the Staff's Petition for Reconsideration on March 28, 2022, in support of the authorized revenue requirement. On October 21, 2022, the Public Service Commission of West Virginia denied the motion for reconsideration.
Pending General Rate Case Filings
On July 1, 2022, the Company’s California subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting an increase in 2024 revenue of $56 million and a total increase in revenue over the 2024 to 2026 period of $95 million, with all increases compared against 2022 revenues. The Company updated its filing in January 2023 to capture the authorized step increase effective January 1, 2023. The filing was also updated to incorporate a decoupling proposal and a revision to the Company’s sales and associated variable expense forecast. The revised requested additional annualized revenues for the test year 2024 is now $37 million, compared against 2023 revenues. This excludes the proposed step rate and attrition rate increase for 2025 and 2026 of $20 million and $19 million, respectively. The total revenue requirement request for the three-year rate case cycle, incorporating updates to present rate revenues and forecasted demand, is $76 million.
On July 1, 2022, the Company’s Missouri subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $105 million in additional annualized revenues.
On November 15, 2021, the Company’s Virginia subsidiary filed a general rate case requesting $14 million in additional annualized revenues. Interim rates were effective on May 1, 2022, and the difference between interim and final approved rates is subject to refund. On September 26, 2022, a settlement agreement, supported by all parties except one, was filed with the Virginia State Corporation Commission for a $11 million annual revenue increase. Public hearings were held on September 27 and 28, 2022. A final decision on this matter is expected in the first quarter of 2023.
The Company’s California subsidiary submitted its application on May 3, 2021, to set its cost of capital for 2022 through 2024. According to the CPUC’s procedural schedule, a decision setting the authorized cost of capital is expected to be issued in the first quarter of 2023.
92

Infrastructure Surcharges
A number of states have authorized the use of regulatory mechanisms that permit rates to be adjusted outside of a general rate case for certain costs and investments, such as infrastructure surcharge mechanisms that permit recovery of capital investments to replace aging infrastructure. Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, assuming a constant water sales volume and customer count, resulting from infrastructure surcharge authorizations that became effective during 2022:
(In millions)Effective DateAmount
Infrastructure surcharges by state:
New Jersey(a)$11 
Pennsylvania(b)19 
Missouri(c)30 
TennesseeAugust 8, 2022
KentuckyJuly 1, 2022
IndianaMarch 21, 2022
West VirginiaMarch 1, 2022
IllinoisJanuary 1, 2022
Total infrastructure surcharge authorizations$83 
(a)In 2022, $1 million was effective December 30 and $10 million was effective June 27.
(b)In 2022, $8 million was effective on October 1, $9 million was effective July 1 and $2 million was effective April 1.
(c)In 2022, $18 million was effective August 11 and $12 million was effective February 1.
Presented in the table below are annualized incremental revenues, assuming a constant water sales volume and customer count, resulting from infrastructure surcharge authorizations that became effective on or after January 1, 2023:
(In millions)Effective DateAmount
Infrastructure surcharge filings by state:
MissouriJanuary 16, 2023$15 
West VirginiaJanuary 1, 2023
PennsylvaniaJanuary 1, 2023
Total infrastructure surcharge filings$25 
Pending Infrastructure Surcharge Filings
On January 20, 2023, the Company’s Indiana subsidiary filed an infrastructure surcharge proceeding requesting $21 million in additional annualized revenue
On November 18, 2022, the Company’s Indiana subsidiary filed an infrastructure surcharge proceeding requesting $7 million in additional annualized revenues.
Other Regulatory Matters
In September 2020, the CPUC released a decision under its Low-Income Rate Payer Assistance program rulemaking that required the Company’s California subsidiary to file a proposal to alter its water revenue adjustment mechanism in its next general rate case filing in 2022, which would become effective in January 2024. On October 5, 2020, the Company’s California subsidiary filed an application for rehearing of the decision and following the CPUC’s denial of its rehearing application in September 2021, the Company’s California subsidiary filed a petition for writ of review with the California Supreme Court on October 27, 2021. On May 18, 2022, the California Supreme Court issued a writ of review for the Company’s California subsidiary’s petition and the petitions filed by other entities challenging the decision. Independent of the judicial challenge, California passed Senate Bill 1469, which allows the CPUC to consider and authorize the implementation of a mechanism that separates the water corporation’s revenue and its water sales. Legislation was signed by the Governor on September 30, 2022, and became effective on January 1, 2023. In response to the legislation, on January 27, 2023, the Company’s California subsidiary filed an updated application requesting the CPUC to consider a Water Resources Sustainability Plan decoupling mechanism in its pending 2022 general rate case, which would be effective 2024 through 2026.
93

On March 2, 2021, an administrative law judge (“ALJ”) in the Office of Administrative Law of New Jersey filed an initial decision with the NJBPU that recommended denial of a petition filed by the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary, which sought approval of acquisition adjustments in rate base of $29 million associated with the acquisitions of Shorelands Water Company, Inc. in 2017 and the Borough of Haddonfield’s water and wastewater systems in 2015. On July 29, 2021, the NJBPU issued an order adopting the ALJ’s initial decision without modification. The Company’s New Jersey subsidiary filed a Notice of Appeal with the New Jersey Appellate Division on September 10, 2021. The Company’s New Jersey subsidiary filed its brief in support of the appeal on March 4, 2022. Response and Reply briefs were filed on June 22, 2022, and August 4, 2022, respectively. There is no financial impact to the Company as a result of the NJBPU’s order, since the acquisition adjustments are currently recorded as goodwill on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Regulatory Assets
Regulatory assets represent costs that are probable of recovery from customers in future rates. Approximately 50% of the Company’s total regulatory asset balance at December 31, 2022 earns a return. Presented in the table below is the composition of regulatory assets as of December 31:
 20222021
Deferred pension expense$251 $323 
Removal costs recoverable through rates307 313 
Regulatory balancing accounts26 52 
Other406 439 
Less: Regulatory assets included in assets held for sale (a)
— (76)
Total regulatory assets$990 $1,051 
(a)These regulatory assets are related to the sale of the Company’s New York subsidiary, which was completed on January 1, 2022, and are included in assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.
The Company’s deferred pension expense includes a portion of the underfunded status that is probable of recovery through rates in future periods of $251 million and $317 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The remaining portion is the pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans which is deferred by certain subsidiaries and will be recovered in future service rates as contributions are made to the pension plan.
Removal costs recoverable through rates represent costs incurred for removal of property, plant and equipment or other retirement costs.
Regulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded. Regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts.
Other regulatory assets include the financial impacts relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, purchase premium recoverable through rates, tank painting costs, certain construction costs for treatment facilities, property tax stabilization, employee-related costs, business services project expenses, coastal water project costs, rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others. These costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods.
The Company has current regulatory assets of $40 million and $16 million included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which is primarily made up of rate adjustment mechanisms.
94

Regulatory Liabilities
Regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate making process. Also, if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates, the Company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities. Presented in the table below is the composition of regulatory liabilities as of December 31:
 20222021
Income taxes recovered through rates$1,127 $1,093 
Removal costs recovered through rates275 291 
Postretirement benefit liability100 153 
Other88 110 
Less: Regulatory liabilities included in liabilities related to assets held for sale (a)
— (47)
Total regulatory liabilities$1,590 $1,600 
(a)These regulatory liabilities are related to the sale of the Company’s New York subsidiary, which was completed on January 1, 2022, and are included in liabilities related to assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.
Income taxes recovered through rates relate to deferred taxes that will likely be refunded to the Company’s customers. On December 22, 2017, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“TCJA”) was signed into law, which, among other things, enacted significant and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, including a reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as of January 1, 2018. The enactment of the TCJA required a re-measurement of the Company’s deferred income taxes. The portion of this re-measurement related to the Regulated Businesses was substantially offset by a regulatory liability as EADIT will be used to benefit its regulated customers in future rates. All of the Company’s regulated subsidiaries are amortizing EADIT and crediting customers.
Removal costs recovered through rates are estimated costs to retire assets at the end of their expected useful lives that are recovered through customer rates over the lives of the associated assets.
On August 31, 2018, the Postretirement Medical Benefit Plan was remeasured to reflect an announced plan amendment which changed benefits for certain union and non-union plan participants. As a result of the remeasurement, the Company recorded a $227 million reduction to the net accumulated postretirement benefit obligation, with a corresponding regulatory liability.
Other regulatory liabilities include the financial impacts relating to the COVID-19 pandemic, TCJA reserve on revenue, pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts, legal settlement proceeds, deferred gains and various regulatory balancing accounts.
The Company has current regulatory liabilities of $5 million and $8 million included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, which primarily is made up of TCJA reserve on revenue.
95

Note 4: Revenue Recognition
Disaggregated Revenues
Presented in the table below are operating revenues disaggregated for the year ended December 31, 2022:
Revenues from Contracts with CustomersOther Revenues Not from Contracts with Customers (a)Total Operating Revenues
Regulated Businesses:
Water services: 
Residential$1,938 $$1,941 
Commercial709 710 
Fire service147 — 147 
Industrial152 153 
Public and other252 — 252 
Total water services3,198 3,203 
Wastewater services: 
Residential173 174 
Commercial45 — 45 
Industrial— 
Public and other19 — 19 
Total wastewater services241 242 
Miscellaneous utility charges36 — 36 
Alternative revenue programs— 15 15 
Lease contract revenue— 
Total Regulated Businesses3,475 30 3,505 
Other288 (1)287 
Total operating revenues$3,763 $29 $3,792 
(a)Includes revenues associated with provisional rates, alternative revenue programs, lease contracts and intercompany rent, which are outside the scope of ASC 606, and accounted for under other existing GAAP.
96

Presented in the table below are operating revenues disaggregated for the year ended December 31, 2021:
Revenues from Contracts with CustomersOther Revenues Not from Contracts with Customers (a)Total Operating Revenues
Regulated Businesses:
Water services: 
Residential$1,935 $— $1,935 
Commercial676 — 676 
Fire service151 — 151 
Industrial141 — 141 
Public and other230 — 230 
Total water services3,133 — 3,133 
Wastewater services:
Residential151 — 151 
Commercial37 — 37 
Industrial— 
Public and other16 — 16 
Total wastewater services208 — 208 
Miscellaneous utility charges26 — 26 
Alternative revenue programs— 
Lease contract revenue— 
Total Regulated Businesses3,367 17 3,384 
Other547 (1)546 
Total operating revenues$3,914 $16 $3,930 
(a)Includes revenues associated with provisional rates, alternative revenue programs, lease contracts and intercompany rent, which are outside the scope of ASC 606, and accounted for under other existing GAAP.
97

Presented in the table below are operating revenues disaggregated for the year ended December 31, 2020:
Revenues from Contracts with CustomersOther Revenues Not from Contracts with Customers (a)Total Operating Revenues
Regulated Businesses:
Water services: 
Residential$1,895 $— $1,895 
Commercial627 — 627 
Fire service147 — 147 
Industrial133 — 133 
Public and other201 — 201 
Total water services3,003 — 3,003 
Wastewater services:
Residential134 — 134 
Commercial34 — 34 
Industrial— 
Public and other14 — 14 
Total wastewater services185 — 185 
Miscellaneous utility charges32 — 32 
Alternative revenue programs— 25 25 
Lease contract revenue— 10 10 
Total Regulated Businesses3,220 35 3,255 
Other523 (1)522 
Total operating revenues$3,743 $34 $3,777 
(a)Includes revenues associated with provisional rates, alternative revenue programs, lease contracts and intercompany rent, which are outside the scope of ASC 606, and accounted for under other existing GAAP.
Contract Balances
Contract assets and contract liabilities are the result of timing differences between revenue recognition, billings and cash collections. In the Company’s MSG, certain contracts are billed as work progresses in accordance with agreed-upon contractual terms, either at periodic intervals or upon achievement of contractual milestones. Contract assets are recorded when billing occurs subsequent to revenue recognition and are reclassified to accounts receivable when billed and the right to consideration becomes unconditional. Contract liabilities are recorded when the Company receives advances from customers prior to satisfying contractual performance obligations, particularly for construction contracts, and are recognized as revenue when the associated performance obligations are satisfied.
Contract assets of $86 million, $71 million and $39 million are included in unbilled revenues on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were $161 million of contract assets added during 2022, and $146 million of contract assets were transferred to accounts receivable during 2022. There were $71 million of contract assets added during 2021, and $39 million of contract assets were transferred to accounts receivable during 2021.
Contract liabilities of $91 million, $19 million and $35 million are included in other current liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There were $189 million of contract liabilities added during 2022, and $117 million of contract liabilities were recognized as revenue during 2022. There were $152 million of contract liabilities added during 2021, and $168 million of contract liabilities were recognized as revenue during 2021.
98

Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations (“RPOs”) represent revenues the Company expects to recognize in the future from contracts that are in progress. The Company enters into agreements for the provision of services to water and wastewater facilities for the U.S. military, municipalities and other customers. As of December 31, 2022, the Company’s O&M and capital improvement contracts in MSG and the Contract Services Group have RPOs. Contracts with the U.S. government for work on various military installations expire between 2051 and 2071 and have RPOs of $7.0 billion as of December 31, 2022, as measured by estimated remaining contract revenue. Such contracts are subject to customary termination provisions held by the U.S. government, prior to the agreed-upon contract expiration. Contracts with municipalities and commercial customers expire between 2026 and 2038 and have RPOs of $589 million as of December 31, 2022, as measured by estimated remaining contract revenue. Some of the Company’s long-term contracts to operate and maintain the federal government’s, a municipality’s or other party’s water or wastewater treatment and delivery facilities include responsibility for certain maintenance for some of those facilities, in exchange for an annual fee. Unless specifically required to perform certain maintenance activities, the maintenance costs are recognized when the maintenance is performed.
Note 5: Acquisitions and Divestitures
Regulated Businesses
Closed Acquisitions
During 2017,2022, the Company closed on 1826 acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $210 million. This included$335 million, of which $315 million was funded in 2022, which added approximately 70,000 water and wastewater customers, including the acquisition of the City of York wastewater system assets of the Municipal Authority of the City of McKeesport, Pennsylvania, on December 18, 2017. noted below. Assets acquired from these acquisitions, principally utility plant, totaled $207 million. Liabilities$337 million and liabilities assumed totaled $23 million, including $9 million$6 million. Several of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $7 million. The Company recorded additional goodwill of $29 million associated with four of itsthese acquisitions which is reported in its Regulated Businesses segment. Of this total goodwill, approximately $1 million is expected to be deductiblewere accounted for tax purposes. Additionally, the Company recognized a bargain purchase gain of $3 million associated with three of the acquisitions.as business combinations. The preliminary purchase price allocations related to these acquisitions accounted for as business combinations will be finalized once the valuation of assets acquired has been completed, no later than one year after their acquisition date.
On May 27, 2022, the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary acquired the public wastewater collection and treatment system assets from the York City Sewer Authority and the City of York for a purchase price of $235 million, in cash, $20 million of which was funded as a deposit to the seller in April 2021 in connection with the execution of the acquisition agreement. The system assets serve, directly and indirectly through bulk contracts, more than 45,000 customers. The acquisition was accounted for as a business combination and the preliminary purchase price allocation will be finalized once the valuation of assets acquired has been completed, no later than one year after the acquisition date. The preliminary purchase price allocation consisted primarily of $231 million of utility plant and $4 million of goodwill, which is reported in the Company’s Regulated Businesses segment.
During 2016,2021, the Company closed on 1523 acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $199$112 million. This included the acquisition of substantially all of the wastewater collection and treatment assets of the Sewer Authority of the City of Scranton, Pennsylvania (“Scranton”) in December 2016. Assets acquired from these acquisitions, principally utility plant, totaled $194 million. Liabilities assumed totaled $30$114 million including $14 million of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $6 million. During 2016, the Company recorded additional goodwill of $43 million associated with five of its acquisitions, which is reported in its Regulated Businesses segment. Of this total goodwill, approximately $31 million is expected to be deductible for tax purposes. Additionally, during 2017 the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment of $5 million, increasing the goodwill recognized from the Scranton acquisition.
During 2015, the Company closed on 14 acquisitions of various regulated water and wastewater systems for a total aggregate purchase price of $64 million. Assets acquired, principally utility plant, totaled $90 million. Liabilities assumed totaled $26 million, including $10 million of contributions in aid of construction and assumed debt of $1 million. The Company recorded additional goodwill of $3 million associated with four of its acquisitions, which is reported in its Regulated Businesses segment and is expected to be fully deductible for tax purposes. The Company also recognized a bargain purchase gain of $3 million associated with five of its acquisitions, of which $1 million was deferred as a regulatory liability.
During 2015, the Company also closed on the Keystone acquisition, which is included as part of the Market-Based Businesses, for a total purchase price of $133 million, net of cash received. The fair value of identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed was $56totaled $2 million and $7 million, respectively, and principally included the acquisition. Several of nonutility property of $25 million, accounts receivable and unbilled revenues of $18 million and intangible assets of $12 million. The purchase price allocation, which is based on the estimated fair value of net assets acquired, resulted in the Company recording redeemable noncontrolling interest of $7 million and additional goodwill of $91 million. This goodwill is expected to be fully deductiblethese acquisitions were accounted for tax purposes.as business combinations.
The pro forma impact of ourthe Company’s acquisitions was not material to ourthe Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 20172022, 2021 and 2016.2020.
Pending Acquisitions
On October 11, 2022, the Company’s Pennsylvania subsidiary entered into an agreement to acquire the wastewater assets of the Butler Area Sewer Authority for a total purchase price of $232 million in cash, subject to adjustment as provided for in the Asset Purchase Agreement. This system provides wastewater service for approximately 14,700 customer connections. The Company expects to close this acquisition by the end of 2023, pending regulatory approval.
On March 29, 2021, the Company’s New Jersey subsidiary entered into an agreement to acquire the water and wastewater assets of Egg Harbor City for $22 million. The water and wastewater systems currently serve approximately 1,500 customers each, or 3,000 combined, and are being sold through the New Jersey Water Infrastructure Protection Act process. The Company expects to close this acquisition in early 2023.
99

Sale of New York American Water Company, Inc.
On January 1, 2022, the Company completed the previously disclosed sale of its regulated utility operations in New York to Liberty Utilities (Eastern Water Holdings) Corp. (“Liberty”), an indirect, wholly owned subsidiary of Algonquin Power & Utilities Corp. Liberty purchased from the Company all of the capital stock of the Company’s New York subsidiary for a purchase price of $608 million in cash. The sale was approved by the New York State Department of Public Service on December 16, 2021. The Company’s regulated New York operations represented approximately 127,000 customers in the State of New York. The assets and related liabilities of the New York subsidiary were classified as held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021.
Presented in the table below are the components of assets held for sale and liabilities related to assets held for sale of the New York subsidiary as of December 31, 2021:
December 31, 2021
Property, plant and equipment$556 
Current assets18 
Regulatory assets76 
Goodwill27 
Other assets
Assets held for sale$683 
Current liabilities13 
Regulatory liabilities47 
Other liabilities23 
Liabilities related to assets held for sale$83 
Sale of Michigan American Water Company
On February 4, 2022, the Company completed the sale of its operations in Michigan for $6 million in cash.
Sale of Homeowner Services Group
On December 9, 2021 (the “Closing Date”), the Company sold all of the equity interests in subsidiaries that comprised HOS to a wholly owned subsidiary of funds advised by Apax Partners LLP, a global private equity advisory firm (the “Buyer”), for total consideration of approximately $1.275 billion, resulting in pre-tax gain of $748 million. The consideration is comprised of $480 million in cash, a seller promissory note issued by the Buyer in the principal amount of $720 million, and a contingent cash payment of $75 million payable upon satisfaction of certain conditions on or before December 31, 2023. See Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Information for additional information relating to the seller promissory note and contingent cash payment. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded post-closing adjustments, primarily related to working capital, of pre-tax income of $20 million, which is included in Gain on sale of businesses on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The seller note has a five-year term, is payable in cash, and bears interest at a rate of 7.00% per year during the term. The Company recognized $50 million of interest income during the year ended December 31, 2022, from the seller note. The repayment obligations of the Buyer under the seller note have been secured by a first priority security interest in certain property of the Buyer and the former HOS subsidiaries, including their cash and securities accounts, as well as a pledge of the equity interests in each of those subsidiaries, subject to certain limitations and exceptions. The seller note requires compliance with affirmative and negative covenants (subject to certain conditions, limitations and exceptions), including a covenant limiting the incurrence by the Buyer and certain affiliates of additional indebtedness in excess of certain thresholds, but does not include any financial maintenance covenants.
Beginning December 9, 2024, the Company has a put right pursuant to which it may require the seller note to be repaid in full at par, plus accrued and unpaid interest, except that upon the occurrence of a disruption event in the broadly syndicated term loan “B” debt financing market, repayment by the Buyer pursuant to the Company’s exercise of the put right will be delayed until the market disruption event ends.
The seller note may not be prepaid at the Buyer’s election except in certain limited circumstances before the fourth anniversary of the Closing Date. If the Buyer seeks to repay the seller note in breach of this non-call provision, an event of default will occur under the seller note and the Company may, among other actions, demand repayment in full together with a premium ranging from 105.5% to 107.5% of the outstanding principal amount of the loan and a customary “make-whole” payment.
100

The Company and the Buyer also entered into a revenue share agreement, pursuant to which the Company is to receive 10% of the revenue generated from customers who are billed for home warranty services through an applicable Company subsidiary (an “on-bill” arrangement), and 15% of the revenue generated from any future on-bill arrangements entered into after the Closing Date. Unless earlier terminated, this agreement has a term of up to 15 years, which may be renewed for up to two five-year periods. The Company recognized $9 million of income during the year ended December 31, 2022, from the revenue share agreements, which is included in Other, net on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Note 4:6: Property, Plant and Equipment
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the major classes of property, plant and equipment by category as of December 31:
20222021Range of Remaining Useful LivesWeighted Average Useful Life
Utility plant:    
Land and other non-depreciable assets$239 $210   
Sources of supply1,003 938 10 to 127 years46 years
Treatment and pumping facilities4,298 4,198 3 to 101 years39 years
Transmission and distribution facilities12,971 12,308 9 to 128 years69 years
Services, meters and fire hydrants5,162 4,888 5 to 90 years32 years
General structures and equipment2,289 2,200 1 to 109 years15 years
Waste collection1,539 1,363 5 to 113 years56 years
Waste treatment, pumping and disposal1,129 912 2 to 153 years38 years
Construction work in progress974 934   
Other (a)
23 (664)
Total utility plant29,627 27,287   
Nonutility property109 126 3 to 50 years10 years
Total property, plant and equipment$29,736 $27,413   
 2017 2016 Range of Remaining
Useful Lives
 Weighted Average
Useful Life
Utility plant:       
Land and other non-depreciable assets$151
 $147
    
Sources of supply798
 734
 2 to 127 Years 45 years
Treatment and pumping facilities3,356
 3,218
 3 to 101 Years 37 years
Transmission and distribution facilities9,583
 9,043
 9 to 156 Years 72 years
Services, meters and fire hydrants3,754
 3,504
 5 to 90 Years 30 years
General structures and equipment1,458
 1,343
 1 to 156 Years 16 years
Waste treatment, pumping and disposal557
 457
 3 to 106 Years 37 years
Waste collection904
 637
 5 to 97 Years 55 years
Construction work in progress585
 419
    
Total utility plant21,146
 19,502
    
Nonutility property570
 452
 3 to 50 years 6 years
Total property, plant and equipment$21,716
 $19,954
    
(a)This includes utility plant acquisition adjustment balances in addition to property, plant and equipment related to the sale of the Company’s New York subsidiary, which was completed on January 1, 2022, and is included in assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.

Property, plant and equipment depreciation expense amounted to $460$552 million, $435 $550 million, and $405$520 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively and was included in depreciation and amortization expense inon the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. The provision for depreciation expressed as a percentage of the aggregate average depreciable asset balances was 3.07%2.60%, 3.14%2.77% and 3.13%2.82% for years December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Additionally, the Company had capital expenditures acquired on account but unpaid of $330 million and $292 million included in accrued liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.
In 2019, the Company completed and submitted its project completion certification to the New Jersey Economic Development Authority (“NJEDA”) in connection with its capital investment in its corporate headquarters in Camden, New Jersey. The NJEDA determined that the Company was qualified to receive $164 million in tax credits over a 10-year period. In October 2022, the NJEDA issued the Company a revised tax credit certificate in the amount of $161 million in tax credits to be received over the same 10-year period. The NJEDA denied previously approved capitalized interest cost amounting to $2.8 million. As a result, the Company adjusted the amounts included in Property, plant and equipment.
The Company is required to meet various annual requirements in order to monetize one-tenth of the tax credits annually and is subject to a claw-back period if the Company does not meet certain NJEDA requirements of the tax credit program in years 11 through 15.
One of the requirements to qualify for the release of credits annually is that the Company maintain a certain level of eligible positions at the qualified business facility (“QBF”). Prior to March 2020, a full-time employee must have spent at least 80% of their time at the QBF to meet the definition of eligible position or full-time job. On July 2, 2021, New Jersey’s Governor signed legislation that revised provisions of the Economic Recovery Act of 2020, which lowered the 80% requirement for spending time at the QBF to 60% of the employee’s time.
101

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the NJEDA implemented certain accommodations that temporarily waived the requirement that a full-time employee spend the requisite percentage of time at the QBF to be eligible for the award under the program. This waiver expired on June 30, 2022.
On December 22, 2022, the New Jersey Governor signed legislation which provides an additional waiver to eligible businesses for the period of July 1, 2022 to December 31, 2023. Specifically, it allows businesses to waive the 60% on-site requirement if (i) full-time workers spend at least 10% of their work hours at the QBF and (ii) the business pays NJEDA 5% of the amount of the tax credit the business receives for the 2022 tax period. The legislation also (i) extends the time within which a business may terminate their participation in the program to December 31, 2023, without the NJEDA recapturing previously distributed credits; (ii) extends the time allowed under current law for a business to suspend its obligations under the incentive agreement; (iii) extends the provision to include the 2022 and 2023 tax periods; and (iv) renews and extends the right of a business to reduce the required full-time employees specified in the incentive agreement to be eligible to receive the credit. The Company is considering all of its options as a result of the most recent legislation.
In December 2022, the NJEDA issued the utilization certificate for the 2019 tax credits to the Company in the amount of $16 million. The Company sold these tax credits to external parties in December 2022 for $15 million. The loss on sale of credits was recorded to Other income (expense) in the Consolidated Results of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2022. As a result, the Company had assets of $48 million and $97 million in Other current assets and Other long-term assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022. The Company has made the necessary annual filings for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2021, and expects to make the 2022 filing by April 30, 2023. The remaining submitted filings are under review by the NJEDA and it is expected that the Company will receive final NJEDA approval and monetize the credits in 2023.
Note 5:7: Allowance for Uncollectible Accounts
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the changes in the Company’s allowances for uncollectible accounts for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Balance as of January 1$(75)$(60)$(41)
Amounts charged to expense(24)(37)(34)
Amounts written off27 35 23 
Other, net (a)12 (13)(8)
Balance as of December 31$(60)$(75)$(60)
 2017 2016 2015
Balance as of January 1$(40) $(39) $(35)
Amounts charged to expense(29) (27) (32)
Amounts written off30
 29
 31
Recoveries of amounts written off(3) (3) (3)
Balance as of December 31$(42) $(40) $(39)
Note 6: Regulatory Assets and Liabilities
Regulatory Assets
Regulatory assets represent costs that are probable of recovery from customers in future rates. The majority of the regulatory assets earn a return. The following table summarizes the composition of regulatory assets as of December 31:
 2017 2016
Deferred pension expense$285
 $310
Income taxes recoverable through rates
 241
Removal costs recoverable through rates269
 251
San Clemente Dam project costs89
 91
Regulatory balancing accounts113
 110
Debt expense67
 66
Make-whole premium on early extinguishment of debt27
 
Purchase premium recoverable through rates57
 58
Deferred tank painting costs42
 39
Other112
 123
Total Regulatory Assets$1,061
 $1,289
The Company’s deferred pension expense includes a(a)This portion of the underfunded status thatallowance for uncollectible accounts is probableprimarily related to COVID-19 related regulatory asset activity. The 2021 and 2020 activity also includes the portion of recovery through ratesthe allowance related to the Company’s New York subsidiary, which was completed on January 1, 2022, and is included in future periods of $270 million and $300 millionassets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20172021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and 2016, respectively. The remaining portion is the pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans which is deferred by certain subsidiaries and will be recovered in future service rates as contributions are made to the pension plan.Divestitures for additional information.
The Company has recorded a regulatory asset for the additional revenues expected to be realized when the tax effects of temporary differences previously flowed through to customers, reverse. These temporary differences are primarily related to the difference between book and tax depreciation on property placed in service before the adoption by the regulatory authorities of full normalization for rate making purposes. Full normalization requires no flow through of tax benefits to customers. The regulatory asset for income taxes recoverable through rates is net of the reduction expected in future revenues as deferred taxes previously provided, attributable to the difference between the state and federal income tax rates under prior law and the current statutory rates, reverse over the average remaining service lives of the related assets.
Removal costs recoverable through rates represent costs incurred for removal of property, plant and equipment or other retirement costs.

San Clemente Dam project costs represent costs incurred and deferred by the Company’s California subsidiary pursuant to its efforts to investigate alternatives to strengthen or remove the dam due to potential earthquake and flood safety concerns. In June 2012, the California Public Utilities Commission (“CPUC”) issued a decision authorizing implementation of a project to reroute the Carmel River and remove the San Clemente Dam. The project includes the Company’s California subsidiary, the California State Conservancy and the National Marine Fisheries Services. Under the order’s terms, the CPUC has authorized recovery for pre-construction costs, interim dam safety measures and environmental costs and construction costs. The authorized costs are to be recovered via a surcharge over a twenty-year period which began in October 2012. The unrecovered balance of project costs incurred, including cost of capital, net of surcharges totaled $89 million and $91 million as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Surcharges collected were $7 million and $4 million for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. In the current general rate case in California, there is a pending request to reset the twenty-year recovery period to begin on January 1, 2018 and to set the annual recovery amount.
Regulatory balancing accounts accumulate differences between revenues recognized and authorized revenue requirements until they are collected from customers or are refunded. Regulatory balancing accounts include low income programs and purchased power and water accounts.
Debt expense is amortized over the lives of the respective issues. Call premiums on the redemption of long-term debt, as well as unamortized debt expense, are deferred and amortized to the extent they will be recovered through future service rates.
As a result of American Water Capital Corp.’s prepayment of the 5.62% Series C Senior Notes due December 21, 2018 (“Series C Senior Notes”) and 5.77% Series D Senior Notes due December 21, 2021 (“Series D Senior Notes”) and payment of a make-whole premium amount to the holders thereof of $34 million, the Company recorded a $6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company. Substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the Company’s utility subsidiaries were recorded as regulatory assets that the Company believes are probable of recovery in future rates. Approximately $1 million of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the Company’s utility subsidiaries was amortized in 2017.
Purchase premium recoverable through rates is primarily the recovery of the acquisition premiums related to an asset acquisition by the Company’s California Utility subsidiary during 2002, and acquisitions in 2007 by the Company’s New Jersey Utility subsidiary. As authorized for recovery by the California and New Jersey PUCs, these costs are being amortized to depreciation and amortization in the Consolidated Statements of Operations through November 2048.
Tank painting costs are generally deferred and amortized to operations and maintenance expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations on a straight-line basis over periods ranging from two to fifteen years, as authorized by the regulatory authorities in their determination of rates charged for service.
Other regulatory assets include certain construction costs for treatment facilities, property tax stabilization, employee-related costs, deferred other postretirement benefit expense, business services project expenses, coastal water project costs, rate case expenditures and environmental remediation costs among others. These costs are deferred because the amounts are being recovered in rates or are probable of recovery through rates in future periods.
Regulatory Liabilities
Regulatory liabilities generally represent amounts that are probable of being credited or refunded to customers through the rate-making process. Also, if costs expected to be incurred in the future are currently being recovered through rates, the Company records those expected future costs as regulatory liabilities. The following table summarizes the composition of regulatory liabilities as of December 31:
 2017 2016
Income taxes recovered through rates$1,242
 $
Removal costs recovered through rates315
 316
Pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts48
 55
Other59
 32
Total Regulatory Liabilities$1,664
 $403

Income taxes recovered through rates relate to deferred taxes that will likely be refunded to the Company’s customers. On December 22, 2017, the TCJA was signed into law, which, among other things, enacted significant and complex changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, including a reduction in the maximum U.S. federal corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% as of January 1, 2018. The TCJA created significant excess deferred income taxes that the Company and its regulatory jurisdictions believe should be refunded to customers. Since these are significant refundable amounts, the Company believes it is probable these amounts will be refunded to customers through future rates, and as such the amounts are recorded to a regulatory liability.
Removal costs recovered through rates are estimated costs to retire assets at the end of their expected useful life that are recovered through customer rates over the life of the associated assets. In December 2008, the Company’s utility subsidiary in New Jersey, at the direction of the New Jersey Board of Public Utilities, began to depreciate $48 million of the total balance into depreciation and amortization expense in the Consolidated Statements of Operations via straight line amortization through November 2048.
Pension and other postretirement benefit balancing accounts represent the difference between costs incurred and costs authorized by the PUCs that are expected to be refunded to customers.
Other regulatory liabilities include legal settlement proceeds, deferred gains and various regulatory balancing accounts.
Note 7:8: Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets
Goodwill
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the changes in the carrying amountvalue of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
 Regulated BusinessesOtherConsolidated
 CostAccumulated ImpairmentCostAccumulated ImpairmentCostAccumulated ImpairmentTotal Net
Balance as of January 1, 2021$3,461 $(2,332)$483 $(108)$3,944 $(2,440)$1,504 
Acquisition related adjustments(7)— — — (7)— (7)
Goodwill included in assets held for sale (a)12 — — — 12 — 12 
Goodwill reduced through sale of HOS— — (370)— (370)— (370)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$3,466 $(2,332)$113 $(108)$3,579 $(2,440)$1,139 
Goodwill from acquisitions— — — — 
Balance as of December 31, 2022$3,470 $(2,332)$113 $(108)$3,583 $(2,440)$1,143 
(a)This goodwill is related to the sale of the Company’s New York subsidiary, which was completed on January 1, 2022, and is included in assets held for sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.
102

 Regulated Businesses Market-Based Businesses Consolidated
 Cost Accumulated Impairment Cost Accumulated Impairment Cost Accumulated Impairment Total Net
Balance as of January 1, 2016$3,415
 $(2,332) $327
 $(108) $3,742
 $(2,440) $1,302
Goodwill from acquisitions43
 
 
 
 43
 
 43
Balance as of December 31, 2016$3,458
 $(2,332) $327
 $(108) $3,785
 $(2,440) $1,345
Goodwill from acquisitions29
 
 
 
 29
 
 29
Measurement period adjustments5
 
 
 
 5
 
 5
Balance as of December 31, 2017$3,492
 $(2,332) $327
 $(108) $3,819
 $(2,440) $1,379
In 2017,2021, the Company reduced goodwill by $370 million included in Other through the sale of HOS. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information relating to the sale of HOS.
The Company completed its annual impairment testing of goodwill as of November 30, 2022, which included qualitative assessments of its Regulated Businesses and MSG reporting units. Based on these assessments, the Company determined that there were no factors present that would indicate that the fair value of these reporting units was less than their respective carrying values as of November 30, 2022.
In 2022, the Company acquired aggregate goodwill of $29$4 million associated with four of its acquisitions in the Regulated Businesses segment. Additionally, during 2017 the Company recorded a measurement period adjustment of $5 million, increasing the goodwill recognized from the Scranton acquisition completed in December 2016.
In 2016, the Company acquired aggregate goodwill of $43 million associated with fiveone of its acquisitions in the Regulated Businesses segment.
Intangible Assets
The Company completed its annual impairment assessment of goodwill as of November 30, 2017held finite-lived intangible assets, including customer relationships and 2016. It elected to apply the qualitative assessment of factors for goodwill in our Regulated Businesses and in Military Services Group and Contract Operations Group reporting units within the Market-Based Businesses for both November 30, 2017 and 2016. The Company also elected to apply the qualitative assessment of factors for annual impairment assessment of goodwill as of November 30, 2016 to its Homeowners Services Group. Based on the work performed, the Company determined that no qualitative factors were present that would indicate the estimated fair values of the above stated reporting units were less than the respective carrying values.
At November 30, 2017, the Company completed step one of the two-step test for its Homeowner Services Group and Keystone reporting units. The Company also completed a step one test for the Keystone reporting unit at November 30, 2016. Based on those valuations, the Company concluded that there were no impairments to its goodwill. The Company used an income approach valuation technique which estimates the discounted future cash flows of operations. The discounted cash flow analysis relies on a single scenario reflecting the best estimate of projected cash flows. Significant assumptions were used in estimating the fair values, including the discount rate, growth rate and terminal value. At November 30, 2017, the estimated fair value of the Homeowner Services Group reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by more than 156%, and the estimated fair value of the Keystone reporting unit exceeded its carrying value by approximately 11%. If further decline in the fair value were to occur, the Keystone reporting unit would be at risk of failing step one of the goodwill impairment test.

There can be no assurances that the Company will not be required to recognize an impairment of goodwill in the future due to market conditions or other factors relatedintangible assets prior to the performancesale of HOS during the fourth quarter of 2021. All of the Company’s reporting units. These market events could include a decline over a period of timefinite-lived intangible assets were sold as part of the Company’s stock price,HOS sale transaction. As a decline over a periodresult, there was no gross carrying value or net book value of time in valuation multiplescustomer relationships and other intangible assets remaining as of comparable water utilities and reporting unit companies, the lack of an increase in the Company’s market price consistent with its peer companies, decreases in control premiums or continued downward pressure on commodity prices. A decline in the forecasted results in our business plan, such as changes in rate case results or capital investment budgets or changes in our interest rates, could also result in an impairment charge. In regards to the Keystone goodwill, adverse developments in market conditions, including prolonged depression of natural gas or oil prices or other factors that negatively impact our forecast operating results, cash flows or key assumptions in the future could result in an impairment charge of a portion or all of the goodwill balance.
Other Intangible Assets
Included in other long-term assets at December 31, 20172022 and 2016, is a $8December 31, 2021. Intangible asset amortization expense amounted to $9 million and $10$12 million respectively,for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, respectively. There was no amortization expense related to customer relationshiprelationships and other intangible resulting fromassets for the Keystone acquisition. This intangible is being amortized on a straight-line basis over a period of eight years.year ended December 31, 2022.
Note 8: Stockholders’9: Shareholders Equity
CommonDividend Reinvestment and Direct Stock Purchase Plan
Under the Company’s dividend reinvestment and direct stock purchase plan (the “DRIP”), stockholdersshareholders may reinvest cash common stock dividends and purchase additional shares of Company common stock, up to certain limits, through the plan administrator without commission fees.paying brokerage commissions. Shares purchased by participants through the DRIP may be newly-issuednewly issued shares, treasury shares, or at the Company’s election, shares purchased by the plan administrator in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. Purchases generally will be made and credited to DRIP accounts once each week. As of December 31, 2017,2022, there were approximately 4.34.2 million shares available for future issuance under the DRIP.
Anti-dilutive Stock Repurchase Program
In February 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized an anti-dilutive stock repurchase program, which allowedallows the Company to purchase up to 10 million shares of its outstanding common stock from time to time over an unrestricted period of time. The Company repurchased 0.7 million shares and 1.0 milliondid not repurchase shares of common stock in the open market at an aggregate cost of $54 million and $65 million under this program forduring the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively.2021. As of December 31, 2017,2022, there were 6.15.1 million shares of common stock available for purchase under the program.
103

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
The followingPresented in the table presentsbelow are the changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component, net of tax, for the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016:2021:
 Defined Benefit Plans Foreign
Currency
Translation
 Gain (Loss)
on Cash
Flow Hedge
 Accumulated Other
Comprehensive
Loss
 Employee
Benefit Plan
Funded Status
 Amortization
of Prior
Service Cost
 Amortization
of Actuarial
Loss
   
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2016$(126) $1
 $36
 $2
 $(1) $(88)
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassification(21) 
 
 
 17
 (4)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
 
 6
 
 
 6
Net other comprehensive income (loss)(21) 
 6
 
 17
 2
Ending balance as of December 31, 2016$(147) $1
 $42
 $2
 $16
 $(86)
Other comprehensive gain (loss) before reclassification7
 
 
 (1) (6) 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
 
 7
 
 
 7
Net other comprehensive income (loss)7
 
 7
 (1) (6) 7
Ending balance as of December 31, 2017$(140) $1
 $49
 $1
 $10
 $(79)

 Defined Benefit PlansGain (Loss) on Cash Flow HedgeAccumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 Employee Benefit Plan Funded StatusAmortization of Prior Service CostAmortization of Actuarial Loss
Beginning balance as of January 1, 2021$(106)$$63 $(7)$(49)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification(1)— — — 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss— — — 
Net other comprehensive income (loss)(1)— 
Ending balance as of December 31, 2021$(107)$$67 $(6)$(45)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassification14 — — 19 
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss— — — 
Net other comprehensive income (loss)14 — 22 
Ending balance as of December 31, 2022$(93)$$70 $(1)$(23)
The Company does not reclassify the amortization of defined benefit pension cost components from accumulated other comprehensive loss directly to net income in its entirety, as a portion of these costs have been capitalizeddeferred as a regulatory asset. These accumulated other comprehensive loss components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost. See Note 14—15—Employee Benefits.Benefits for additional information.
The amortization of the lossgain (loss) on cash flow hedgehedges is reclassified to net income during the period incurred and is included in interest, net in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Dividends and Distributions
The Company’s Board of Directors authorizes the payment of dividends. The Company’s ability to pay dividends on its common stock is subject to having access to sufficient sources of liquidity, net income and cash flows of the Company’s subsidiaries, the receipt of dividends and direct and indirect distributions from, and repayments of indebtedness of, the Company’s subsidiaries, compliance with Delaware corporate and other laws, compliance with the contractual provisions of debt and other agreements and other factors.
The Company’s dividend rate on its common stock is determined by the Board of Directors on a quarterly basis and takes into consideration, among other factors, current and possible future developments that may affect the Company’s income and cash flows. When dividends on common stock are declared, they are typically paid in March, June, September and December. Historically, dividends have been paid quarterly to holders of record as of a date less than 30 days prior to the distribution date. Since the dividends on the Company’s common stock are not cumulative, only declared dividends are paid.
During 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company paid $467 million, $428 million and $389 million in cash dividends, respectively. Presented in the table below is the per share cash dividends paid for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
December$0.6550 $0.6025 $0.55 
September$0.6550 $0.6025 $0.55 
June$0.6550 $0.6025 $0.55 
March$0.6025 $0.55 $0.50 
On December 7, 2022, the Company’s Board of Directors declared a quarterly cash dividend payment of $0.6550 per share payable on March 1, 2023, to shareholders of record as of February 7, 2023.
104

Under applicable law, the Company’s subsidiaries may pay dividends on their capital stock or other equity only from retained, undistributed or current earnings. A significant loss recorded at a subsidiary may limit the amount of the dividend that the subsidiary can pay. The ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay upstream dividends, make other upstream distributions or repay indebtedness to parent company or American Water Capital Corp. (“AWCC”), the Company’s wholly owned financing subsidiary, as applicable, is subject to compliance with applicable corporate, tax and other laws, regulatory restrictions and financial and other contractual obligations, including, for example, (i) regulatory capital, surplus or net worth requirements, (ii) outstanding debt service obligations, (iii) requirements to make preferred and preference stock dividend payments, and (iv) other contractual agreements, covenants or obligations made or entered into by the Company and its subsidiaries.
Regulatory Restrictions on Indebtedness
The issuance of long-term debt or equity securities by the Company or long-term debt by AWCC does not require authorization of any state PUC if no guarantee or pledge of the regulated subsidiaries is utilized. Based on the needs of the Regulated Businesses and parent company, AWCC may borrow funds or issue its debt in the capital markets and then, through intercompany loans, provide these borrowings to the Regulated Businesses or parent company. PUC authorization is generally required for the regulated subsidiaries to incur long-term debt. The Company’s regulated subsidiaries normally obtain these required PUC authorizations on a periodic basis to cover their anticipated financing needs for a period of time, or, as necessary, in connection with a specific financing or refinancing of debt.
Note 9:10: Stock Based Compensation
The Company has granted stock optionsunits, stock awards and restricted stock unit (“RSU”) awardsdividend equivalents to non-employee directors, officers and other key employees of the Company pursuant to the terms of its 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The total aggregate number of shares of common stock that may be issued under the 2007 Plan is 15.5 million. As of December 31, 2017, 7.7 million shares were available for grant under the 2007 Plan.
On May 12, 2017, the Company’s stockholders approved the American Water Works Company, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2017 Omnibus Plan”), approved by the Company’s shareholders in May 2017. Stock units under the 2017 Omnibus Plan generally vest based on (i) continued employment with the Company (“RSUs”), or (ii) continued employment with the Company where distribution of the shares is subject to the satisfaction in whole or in part of stated performance-based goals (“PSUs”). A total of 7.2 million shares of common stock may be issued under the 2017 Omnibus Plan. As of December 31, 2017, 7.22022, 6.3 million shares were available for grant under the 2017 Omnibus Plan. The 2017 Omnibus Plan provides that grants of awards may be in any of the following forms: incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, stock units, stock awards, other stock-based awards and dividend equivalents. Dividend equivalents which may be granted only on stock units or other stock-based awards. FollowingThe 2017 Omnibus Plan expires in 2027.
The Company had granted stock options, stock units, including RSUs and PSUs, and dividend equivalents to non-employee directors, officers and other key employees of the approval ofCompany under its 2007 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “2007 Plan”). The 2007 Plan has been replaced by the 2017 Omnibus Plan, as defined above, and no additional awards are tomay be granted under the 2007 Plan. However, shares willmay still be issued under the 2007 Plan pursuant to the terms of awards previously issued under that plan prior to May 12, 2017.
The cost of services received from employees in exchange for the issuance of stock options and restricted stock awards is measured based on the grant date fair value of the awards issued. The value of stock options and RSUsunit awards at the date of the grant is amortized through expense over the three-yearrequisite service period. All awards granted in 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020 are classified as equity. The Company recognizes compensation expense for stock awards over the vesting period of the award. The Company stratified its grant populations and used historic employee turnover rates to estimate employee forfeitures. The estimated rate is compared to the actual forfeitures at the end of the reporting period and adjusted as necessary. The followingThere have been no significant adjustments to the forfeiture rates during 2022, 2021 and 2020. There were no grants of stock options to employees after 2016, and there were no stock options outstanding as of December 31, 2022. Presented in the table presentsbelow is the stock-based compensation expense recorded in operation and maintenanceO&M expense in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
2017 2016 2015
Stock options$1
 $2
 $2
RSUs9
 8
 8
RSUs and PSUsRSUs and PSUs$26 $15 $19 
Nonqualified employee stock purchase plan1
 1
 1
Nonqualified employee stock purchase plan
Stock-based compensation11
 11
 11
Stock-based compensation28 17 21 
Income tax benefit(4) (4) (4)Income tax benefit(6)(4)(5)
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax$7
 $7
 $7
Stock-based compensation expense, net of tax$22 $13 $16 
There were no significant stock-based compensation costs capitalized during the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015.2020.
The
105

Subject to limitations on deductibility imposed by the Federal income tax code, the Company receives a tax deduction based on the intrinsic value of the award at the exercise date for stock options and the distribution date for RSUs.stock units. For each award, throughout the requisite service period, the Company recognizesrecords the tax benefits, which have been included inimpacts related to compensation costs as deferred income tax assets, related to compensation costs.assets. The tax deductions in excess of the deferred benefits recorded throughout the requisite service period are recorded to the Consolidated Statements of Operations and are presented in the financing section of the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Stock OptionsUnits
There were no grants of stock options to employees in 2017. In 2016During 2022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the Company granted non-qualified stock optionsRSUs to certain employees under the 20072017 Omnibus Plan. RSUs generally vest based on continued employment with the Company over periods ranging from one to three years. The stock options vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning on January 1 of the year of the grant and have no performance vesting conditions. Expense is recognized using the straight-line method and is amortized over the requisite service period.

The following table summarizes the weighted-average assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option-pricing model for grants and the resulting weighted-average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted for the years ended December 31:
 2017 2016 2015
Dividend yield% 2.09% 2.35%
Expected volatility% 15.89% 17.64%
Risk-free interest rate% 1.15% 1.48%
Expected life (years)0
 4.0
 4.4
Exercise price$
 $65.25
 $52.75
Grant date fair value per share$
 $6.61
 $6.21
The Company used the actual historical experience of exercises or expirations of the 2009 grant to determine the expected stock option life. The Company began granting stock optionsRSUs are valued at the time of its initial public offering in April 2008. Expected volatility is based on a weighted average of historic volatilities of traded common stock of peer companies (regulated water companies) over the expected term of the stock options and historic volatilitiesclosing price of the Company’s common stock during the period it has been publicly traded. The dividend yield is based on the Company’s expected dividend payments and the stock price on the date of grant. The risk-free interest rate is the market yield on U.S. Treasury strips with maturities similar togrant and the expected term of the stock options. The exercise price of the stock options is equal to the fair market value of the underlying stock on the date of option grant. Stock optionsmajority vest ratably over periods ranging from one to three years and have a maximum term of seven years from the effective date of the grant.
The table below summarizes stock option activity for the year ended December 31, 2017:
 Shares
(In thousands)
 Weighted-
Average
Exercise
Price (Per share)
 Weighted-
Average
Remaining Life
(Years)
 Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2016987
 $50.65
 4.3 $21
Granted
 
    
Forfeited or expired(14) 62.10
    
Exercised(262) 42.29
    
Options outstanding as of December 31, 2017711
 $53.51
 3.67 $29
Exercisable as of December 31, 2017452
 $48.83
 3.15 $21
As of December 31, 2017, $1 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to nonvested stock options is expected to be recognizedthree-year service period. These RSUs are amortized through expense over the remaining weighted-averagerequisite service period of 1.0 years. The total fair value of stock options vested was $2 million, $1 million and $3 million forusing the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
The following table summarizes additional information regarding stock options exercised during the years ended December 31:
 2017 2016 2015
Intrinsic value$10
 $18
 $22
Exercise proceeds11
 15
 30
Income tax benefit realized3
 6
 7
RSUsstraight-line method.
During 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the Company granted RSUs, both with and without performance conditions, to certain employees under the 2007 Plan. RSUs generally vest over periods ranging from one to three years.
During 2017, the Company granted RSUsstock units to non-employee directors under the 2017 Omnibus Plan, and during 2016 and 2015, these awards were granted under the 2007 Plan. The RSUsstock units were vested in full on the date of grant; however, distribution of the shares will be made within 30 days of the earlier of:of (i) 15 months after grantthe date of the last annual meeting of shareholders, subject to any deferral election by the director;director, or (ii) the participant’s separation from service. Because these RSUsstock units vested on the grant date, the total grant date fair value was recorded in operation and maintenance expense on the grant date.

The RSUs without performance conditions are valued atPresented in the market value of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of the grant and vest ratably over the three-year service period beginning January 1 of the year of the grant. These RSUs are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the straight-line method.
The table below summarizesis RSU and director stock unit activity of RSUs without performance conditions for the year ended December 31, 2017:2022:
Shares (in thousands)Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share)
Non-vested total as of December 31, 202148 $112.22 
Granted59 149.73 
Vested(47)132.59 
Forfeited(9)149.60 
Non-vested total as of December 31, 202251 $130.43 
  Shares
(In thousands)
 Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
(Per share)
Non-vested total as of December 31, 201674
 $56.43
Granted61
 73.43
Vested(42) 56.52
Forfeited(4) 69.09
Non-vested total as of December 31, 201789
 $67.48
As of December 31, 2022, $5 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested RSUs is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining life of 1.69 years. The total fair value of stock units and RSUs vested was $6 million, $9 million and $5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
RSUswith performance conditions During 2022, 2021 and 2020, the Company granted PSUs to certain employees under the 2017 Omnibus Plan. The majority of PSUsvest ratably based on continued employment with the Company over the three-year performance period beginning January 1 of the year of the grant (the “Performance Period”). Distribution of the performance shares is contingent upon the achievement of one or more internal performance measures and, separately, certain market thresholdsa relative total shareholder return performance measure, over the Performance Period.
RSUsPresented in the table below is PSU activity for the year ended December 31, 2022:
Shares (in thousands)Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value (per share)
Non-vested total as of December 31, 2021232 $139.40 
Granted170 115.12 
Vested(150)105.11 
Forfeited(21)148.83 
Non-vested total as of December 31, 2022231 $142.92 
As of December 31, 2022, $6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested PSUs is expected to be recognized over the weighted average remaining life of 0.93 years. The total fair value of PSUs vested was $24 million, $22 million and $18 million for the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
106

PSUs granted with one or more internal performance measures are valued at the market value of the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the date of grant. RSUsPSUs granted with market conditionsa relative total shareholder return condition are valued using a Monte Carlo simulation model. Expected volatility is based on historical volatilities of traded common stock of the Company and comparative companies using daily stock prices over the past three years. The expected term is three years and the risk-free interest rate is based on the three-year U.S. Treasury rate in effect as of the measurement date. The followingPresented in the table presentsbelow are the weighted-averageweighted average assumptions used in the Monte Carlo simulation and the weighted-averageweighted average grant date fair values of RSUsPSUs granted for the years ended December 31:
2017 2016 2015 202220212020
Expected volatility17.40% 15.90% 14.93%Expected volatility29.69%28.59%16.65%
Risk-free interest rate1.53% 0.91% 1.07%Risk-free interest rate1.90%0.22%1.28%
Expected life (years)3.0
 3.0
 3.0
Expected life (years)3.03.03.0
Grant date fair value per share$72.81
 $77.16
 $62.10
Grant date fair value per share$99.23$229.22$159.64
The grant date fair value of restricted stock awardsPSUs that vest ratably and have market and/or performance conditions are amortized through expense over the requisite service period using the graded-vesting method.
The table below summarizes activity of RSUs with performance conditions for the year ended December 31, 2017:
  Shares
(In thousands)
 Weighted
Average Grant
Date Fair Value
(Per share)
Non-vested total as of December 31, 2016309
 $55.94
Granted186
 63.10
Vested(204) 46.10
Forfeited(10) 70.50
Non-vested total as of December 31, 2017281
 $67.33
As of December 31, 2017, $6 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to the nonvested RSUs, with and without performance conditions, is expected to be recognized over the weighted-average remaining life of 1.5 years. The total fair value of RSUs, with and without performance conditions, vested was $16 million, $14 million and $12 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

If dividends are paid with respect to shares of the Company’s common stock before the RSUs are distributed, the Company credits a liability for the value of the dividends that would have been paid if the RSUs were shares of Company common stock. When the RSUs are distributed, the Company pays the participant a lump sum cash payment equal to the value of the dividend equivalents accrued. The Company accrued dividend equivalents totaling less than $1 million, $1 million and $1 million to accumulated deficit in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
The Company maintains a nonqualified employee stock purchase plan (the “ESPP”) that expires in 2027 through which employee participants (which excludes certain of the Company’s executives) may use payroll deductions to acquire Company common stock at the lessera purchase price of 90%85% of the fair market value of the common stock at either the beginning or the end of a three-month purchase period. On February 15, 2017,A total of 2.0 million shares may be issued under the Board adopted the American Water Works Company, Inc.ESPP, and its Designated Subsidiaries 2017 Nonqualified Employee Stock Purchase Plan, which was approved by stockholders on May 12, 2017 and took effect on August 5, 2017. The prior plan was terminated as to new purchases of Company stock effective August 31, 2017. As of December 31, 2017,2022, there were 2.01.5 million shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the ESPP. The ESPP is considered compensatory. During the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, the Company issued 93 thousand, 93 thousandapproximately 82,000, 80,000 and 98 thousand86,000 shares, respectively, under the ESPP.
Note 10:11: Long-Term Debt
The Company obtains long-term debt through AWCC primarily to fund capital expenditures of the Regulated Businesses and to lend funds to parent company to refinance debt ofand for other purposes. Presented in the parent company. The following table summarizesbelow are the components of long-term debt as of December 31:
RateWeighted Average RateMaturity20222021
Long-term debt of AWCC: (a)
     
Senior notes—fixed rate2.30%-8.27%3.88%2023-2051$9,765 $8,965 
Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate0.60%-2.45%1.63%2023-2031189 190 
Long-term debt of other American Water subsidiaries:   
Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate0.00%-5.50%1.80%2023-2051749 739 
Mortgage bonds—fixed rate6.35%-9.19%7.36%2023-2039534 534 
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock8.47%-9.75%8.64%2024-2036
Finance lease obligations12.25%12.25%2026— 
Long-term debt 3.87% 11,240 10,433 
Unamortized debt discount, net (b)
(11)(9)
Unamortized debt issuance costs   (19)(23)
Less current portion of long-term debt   (281)(57)
Total long-term debt   $10,929 $10,344 
  Rate Weighted
Average Rate
 Maturity 2017 2016
Long-term debt of American Water Capital Corp. (a)
          
Senior notes—fixed rate 2.95%-8.27% 4.47% 2018-2047 $5,292
 $4,786
Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.79%-6.25% 5.44% 2021-2040 193
 194
Long-term debt of other American Water subsidiaries          
Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate (b)
 0.00%-6.20% 4.59% 2018-2041 712
 695
Mortgage bonds—fixed rate 3.92%-9.71% 7.41% 2019-2039 607
 636
Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock 8.47%-9.75% 8.60% 2019-2036 10
 12
Capital lease obligations 12.66% 12.66% 2026 1
 1
Term loan 4.81%-5.31% 5.15% 2021 9
 
Long-term debt       6,824
 6,324
Unamortized debt premium, net (c)
       9
 17
Unamortized debt issuance costs       (13) (9)
Interest rate swap fair value adjustment       
 1
Less current portion of long-term debt       (322) (574)
Total long-term debt       $6,498
 $5,759
(a)This indebtedness is considered “debt” for purposes of a support agreement between parent company and AWCC, which serves as a functional equivalent of a full and unconditional guarantee by parent company of AWCC’s payment obligations under such indebtedness.
(a)This indebtedness is considered “debt” for purposes of a support agreement between American Water and American Water Capital Corp. (“AWCC”), the Company’s wholly owned finance subsidiary, which serves as a functional equivalent of a guarantee by American Water of AWCC’s payment obligations under such indebtedness.
(b)Includes $5 million and $6 million of variable rate debt as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, with variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps ranging between 3.93% and 4.72%. This debt was assumed via an acquisition in 2013.
(c)Primarily fair value adjustments previously recognized in acquisition purchase accounting.
(b)Includes debt discount, net of fair value adjustments previously recognized in acquisition purchase accounting.
All mortgage bonds term loans and $709$740 million of the private activity bonds and government funded debt held by the Company’s subsidiaries were collateralized as of December 31, 2017.2022.
107

Long-term debt indentures contain a number of covenants that, among other things, limit, subject to certain exceptions, the CompanyAWCC from issuing debt secured by the Company’s consolidated assets. Certain long term noteslong-term note indentures require the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated total indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization (each as defined under the note indentures) of not more than 0.70 to 1.00. The ratio as of December 31, 20172022, was 0.590.62 to 1.00. In addition, the Company has $922$891 million of notes which include the right to redeem the notes at par value, in whole or in part, from time to time, subject to certain restrictions.restrictions, with a weighted average interest rate of 1.87%.

The followingPresented in the table presentsbelow are future sinking fund payments and debt maturities:
Amount
2023$281 
2024476 
2025598 
2026443 
2027688 
Thereafter8,754 
Year Amount
2018 $322
2019 170
2020 51
2021 299
2022 123
Thereafter 5,859
The followingPresented in the table detailsbelow are the issuances of long-term debt in 2017:2022:
CompanyTypeRateWeighted Average RateMaturityAmount
AWCCSenior notes—fixed rate4.45%4.45%2032$800 
Other American Water subsidiariesPrivate activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate0.00%-1.75%1.03%2027-204222 
Total issuances   $822 
Company Type Rate Maturity Amount
AWCC Senior notes—fixed rate 2.95%-3.75% 2027-2047 $1,350
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 0.00%-1.44% 2020-2037 31
Other American Water subsidiaries Mortgage bonds—fixed rate 3.92% 2020 3
Other American Water subsidiaries Term loan 4.62%-5.12% 2021 11
Total issuances       $1,395
The Company also assumed debt of $7 million as a result of acquisitions during 2017, of which $1 million was paid subsequent to an acquisition closing during 2017. The remaining $6 million of assumed debt has fixed interest rates of 0.00% and 3.92%, maturing in 2024 and 2020, respectively. The Company incurred debt issuance costs of $17$7 million related to the above issuances.
The followingPresented in the table detailsbelow are the retirements and redemptions of long-term debt that was retiredin 2022 through sinking fund provisions, optional redemption or payment at maturity during 2017:maturity:
Company Type Rate Maturity AmountCompanyTypeRateWeighted Average RateMaturityAmount
AWCC Senior notes—fixed rate 5.62%-6.09% 2017-2021 $844
AWCCPrivate activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate1.79%-2.31%2.24%2024-2031$
AWCC Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 1.79%-2.90% 2021-2031 1
Other American Water subsidiaries Private activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate 0.00%-5.38% 2017-2041 15
Other American Water subsidiaries Mortgage bonds—fixed rate 7.08% 2017 33
Other American Water subsidiaries Mandatorily redeemable preferred stock 8.49%-9.18% 2031-2036 2
Other American Water subsidiariesPrivate activity bonds and government funded debt—fixed rate0.00%-5.50%1.50%2022-205113 
Other American Water subsidiaries Term loan 4.31%-5.31% 2021 1
Other American Water subsidiariesMandatorily redeemable preferred stock8.49%8.49%2022
Total retirements and redemptions       $896
Total retirements and redemptions   $15 
On August 10, 2017,May 5, 2022, AWCC completed a $1.35 billion debt offering which included the sale of $600issued $800 million aggregate principal amount of its 2.95% Senior Notes4.45% senior notes due 2027, and $750 million aggregate principal amount of its 3.75% Senior Notes due in 2047.2032. At the closing, of the offering, AWCC received, after deduction of underwriting discounts and debt issuance costs, $1.33 billion. On September 13, 2017,before deduction of offering expenses, net proceeds of approximately $792 million. AWCC used proceeds from the offering to prepay $138 million of its outstanding 5.62% Series C Senior Notes due December 21, 2018 (“Series C Senior Notes”) and $181 million of it’s outstanding 5.77% Series D Senior Notes due December 21, 2021 (“Series D Senior Notes”). AWCC also used thenet proceeds of this offeringthe offering: (i) to lend funds to parent company and its regulated subsidiaries; (ii) to repay AWCC’s commercial paper obligationsobligations; and (iii) for general corporate purposes, and subsequently, on October 15, 2017, to repay at maturity, $524 million of its 6.085% Senior Notes.
As a result of AWCC’s prepayment of the Series C Senior Notes and Series D Senior Notes, and payment of a make-whole premium amount to the holders thereof of $34 million, the Company recorded a $6 million charge resulting from the early extinguishment of debt at the parent company. Substantially all of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the Regulated Businesses were recorded as regulatory assets for the Company believes they are probable of recovery in future rates. Approximately $1 million of the early debt extinguishment costs allocable to the Regulated Businesses were amortized in 2017.

Interest net, includes interest income of approximately $14 million, $14 million and $13 million in 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively.purposes.
One of the principal market risks to which the Company is exposed is changes in interest rates. In order to manage the exposure, the Company follows risk management policies and procedures, including the use of derivative contracts such as swaps.treasury lock agreements. The Company also reduces exposure to interest rates by managing commercial paper and debt maturities. The Company also does not enter into derivative contracts for speculative purposes and does not use leveraged instruments. The derivative contracts entered into are for periods consistent with the related underlying exposures. The Company is exposed to the risk that counterparties to derivative contracts will fail to meet their contractual obligations and minimizes this risk by dealing only with leading, credit-worthycreditworthy financial institutions having long-term credit ratings of “A” or better.
On August 7, 2017, coinciding
108

Table of Contents
In April 2022, the Company entered into several 10-year treasury lock agreements, with AWCC’s $1.35 billion debt offering,notional amounts totaling $400 million, and an average fixed interest rate of 2.89%. The Company designated these treasury lock agreements as cash flow hedges, with their fair value recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss. In May 2022, the Company terminated four existing forward starting swapthe treasury lock agreements, with an aggregate notional amount of $300 million, realizing a net gain of $19approximately $4 million, to be amortized through interest, net over 30 years. On February 8, 2017,a 10-year period, in accordance with the tenor of the debt issuance on May 5, 2022.
In November and December 11, 2017,2022, the Company entered into forward starting swapfour 10-year treasury lock agreements, each with a notional amount ofamounts totaling $100 million, to reduce interest rate exposure on debt expected to be issued in 2018.2023. These forward starting swaptreasury lock agreements terminate in November 2018,January 2024, and have an average fixed rate of 2.59%3.56%. In January 2023, the Company entered into three additional 10-year treasury lock agreements, with notional amounts totaling $100 million, to reduce interest rate exposure on debt expected to be issued in 2023. These treasury lock agreements terminate in January 2024, and have an average fixed rate of 3.35%. The Company has designated these forward starting swaptreasury lock agreements as cash flow hedges, with their fair valuesvalue recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss. Upon termination, the cumulative gain or loss recorded in accumulated other comprehensive gain or loss will be amortized through interest, net over the term of the new debt.
In October 2017, the Company terminated its interest-rate swap to hedge $100 million of its 6.085% Senior Notes maturing in the fourth quarter of 2017. The Company paid variable interest of six-month LIBOR plus 3.422%, and had designated this interest rate swap as a fair value hedge, accounted for at fair value with gains or losses, as well as the offsetting gains or lossesNo ineffectiveness was recognized on the hedged item, recognized in interest, net. The net gain and loss recognized by the Company was de minimis for the periods ended December 31, 2017 and 2016.
The Company has employed interest rate swaps to fix the interest cost on a portion of its variable-rate debt with an aggregate notional amount of $5 million. The Company has designated thesehedging instruments as economic hedges, accounted for at fair value, with gains or losses recognized in interest, net. The gain recognized by the Company was de minimis for the years ended 2017December 31, 2022, 2021 or 2020.
Note 12: Short-Term Debt
Liquidity needs for capital investment, working capital and 2016.
other financial commitments are generally funded through cash flows from operations, public and private debt offerings, commercial paper markets and, if and to the extent necessary, borrowings under the AWCC revolving credit facility, and, in the future, issuances of equity. Additionally, proceeds from the aforementioned sales of HOS and the Company’s New York subsidiary have been used primarily for capital investment in the Regulated Businesses. The following tablerevolving credit facility provides $2.75 billion in aggregate total commitments from a summarydiversified group of financial institutions. The termination date of the gross fair valuecredit agreement with respect to AWCC’s revolving credit facility is October 2027. The facility is used principally to support AWCC’s commercial paper program, to provide additional liquidity support and to provide a sub-limit of up to $150 million for letters of credit. Letters of credit are non-debt instruments maintained to provide credit support for certain transactions as requested by third parties. Subject to satisfying certain conditions, the credit agreement also permits AWCC to increase the maximum commitment under the facility by up to an aggregate of $500 million and to request extensions of its expiration date for up to two one-year periods. As of December 31, 2022, AWCC had no outstanding borrowings and $78 million of outstanding letters of credit under the revolving credit facility, with $1.50 billion available to fulfill the Company’s derivative assetshort-term liquidity needs and liabilities, as well asto issue letters of credit. The Company regularly evaluates the locationcapital markets and closely monitors the financial condition of the assetfinancial institutions with contractual commitments in its revolving credit facility. Interest rates on advances under the facility are based on a credit spread to the Secured Overnight Financing Rate (or applicable market replacement rate) or base rate, each determined in accordance with Moody Investors Service’s and liability balancesS&P Global Ratings’ then applicable credit rating on AWCC’s senior unsecured, non-credit enhanced debt.
On October 26, 2022, AWCC and certain lenders amended and restated the credit agreement with respect to the revolving credit facility to, among other things, increase the maximum commitments under the facility from $2.25 billion to $2.75 billion and to extend the expiration date of the facility from March 2025 to October 2027. Also, effective October 26, 2022, the maximum aggregate principal amount of short-term borrowings authorized under AWCC’s commercial paper program was increased from $2.10 billion to $2.60 billion.
On March 20, 2020, AWCC entered into a Term Loan Credit Agreement, by and among parent company, AWCC and the lenders party thereto (the “Term Loan Facility”). The Term Loan Facility commitments terminated at maturity on March 19, 2021, and the $500 million of principal outstanding under the Term Loan Facility was repaid in full. Borrowings under the Consolidated Balance Sheets asTerm Loan Facility bore interest at a variable annual rate based on LIBOR, plus a margin of December 31:
Derivative Instruments Derivative Designation Balance Sheet Classification 2017 2016
Asset derivative:        
Forward starting swaps Cash flow hedge Other current assets $
 $27
Interest rate swap Fair value hedge Other current assets 
 1
Liability derivative:        
Interest rate swap Fair value hedge Current portion of long-term debt 
 1
Forward starting swaps Cash flow hedge Other current liabilities 3
 
Note 11: Short-Term Debt0.80%.
Short-term debt consists of commercial paper and credit facility borrowings totaling $905$1,177 million and $849$584 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, or net of discount $1,175 million and $584 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The weighted average interest rate on AWCC’s outstanding short-term borrowings was approximately 4.41%, for the year ended December 31, 2022. The weighted average interest rate on AWCC’s outstanding short-term borrowings was 0.20%, for the year ended December 31, 2021. As of December 31, 20172022, there were no commercial paper borrowings outstanding with maturities greater than three months.
AWCC has a revolving credit facility with $1.75 billion in aggregate total commitments from a diversified group
109

Table of financial institutions with a termination date of June 2020. On March 22, 2016, AWCC and its lenders agreed to increase total commitments under AWCC’s revolving credit facility to the $1.75 billion, from $1.25 billion. Other terms and conditions of the existing facility remained unchanged. The agreement also includes a $150 million sublimit for letters of credit and a $100 million sublimit for swing loans. On June 30, 2015, AWCC and its lenders extended the termination date of revolving credit facility from October 2018, to June 2020. This amended and restated agreement also allowed AWCC to request to further extend the term of the credit facility for up to two one-year periods. Issuance costs related to the increased lending commitments will be amortized over the remaining life of the credit facility and is included in interest, netContents
Presented in the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Interest on borrowings are based on a LIBOR-based rate, plus an applicable margin.

Also,tables below is the Company acquired a line of credit facility as part of the Keystone acquisition. This facility has a maximum availability of up to $12 million, dependent on a collateral base calculation. Based on the collateral assets at December 31, 2017, $7 million was available to borrow. At December 31, 2017, there were no outstanding borrowings on this line of credit facility. Borrowings under the facility are due upon demand with interest being paid monthly. Interest accrues each day at a rate per annum equal to 2.75% above the greater of the one month or one day LIBOR. The borrowing base under the facility allows for financing up to the greater of the note or 80% of eligible accounts receivable.
The following table summarizes the Company’s aggregate credit facility commitments, commercial paper limit and letter of credit sub-limitavailability under ourthe revolving credit facility, and commercial paper limit, as well as the available capacity for each, as of:of December 31:
2022
Commercial Paper LimitLetters of CreditTotal (a)
(In millions)
Total availability$2,600 $150 $2,750 
Outstanding debt(1,177)(78)(1,255)
Remaining availability as of December 31, 2022$1,423 $72 $1,495 

 Credit Facility Commitment Available Credit Facility Capacity Letter of Credit Sublimit (a) Available Letter of Credit Capacity Commercial Paper Limit Available Commercial Paper Capacity
December 31, 2017 $1,762
 $1,673
 $150
 $66
 $1,600
 $695
December 31, 2016 1,766
 1,668
 150
 62
 1,600
 751
(a)Total remaining availability of $1.50 billion as of December 31, 2022, may be accessed through revolver draws.
(a)Letters of credit are non-debt instruments maintained to provide credit support for certain transactions as requested by third parties. The Company had $84 million and $88 million of outstanding letters of credit as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, all of which were issued under
2021
Commercial Paper LimitLetters of CreditTotal (a)
(In millions)
Total availability$2,100 $150 $2,250 
Outstanding debt(584)(76)(660)
Remaining availability as of December 31, 2021$1,516 $74 $1,590 
(a)Total remaining availability of $1.59 billion as of December 31, 2021, may be accessed through revolver draws.
Presented in the revolving credit facility noted above.
The following table summarizesbelow is the Company’s total available liquidity as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively:
Cash and Cash EquivalentsAvailability on Revolving Credit FacilityTotal Available Liquidity
(In millions)
Available liquidity as of December 31, 2022$85 $1,495 $1,580 
Available liquidity as of December 31, 2021$116 $1,590 $1,706 
Presented in the table below is the short-term borrowing activity for AWCC for the years ended December 31:
2017 201620222021
Average borrowings$779
 $850
Average borrowings$505 $910 
Maximum borrowings outstanding1,135
 1,016
Maximum borrowings outstanding1,177 1,647 
Weighted average interest rates, computed on daily basis1.24% 0.78%
Weighted average interest rates, as of December 311.61% 0.98%Weighted average interest rates, as of December 314.41 %0.20 %
The credit facility requires the Company to maintain a ratio of consolidated debt to consolidated capitalization of not more than 0.70 to 1.00. The ratio as of December 31, 20172022 was 0.590.62 to 1.00.
None of the Company’s borrowings are subject to default or prepayment as a result of a downgrading of securities, although such a downgrading could increase fees and interest charges under the Company’sAWCC’s revolving credit facility.
As part of the normal course of business, the Company routinely enters contracts for the purchase and sale of water, energy, fuels and other services. These contracts either contain express provisions or otherwise permit the Company and its counterparties to demand adequate assurance of future performance when there are reasonable grounds for doing so. In accordance with the contracts and applicable contract law, if the Company is downgraded by a credit rating agency, especially if such downgrade is to a level below investment grade, it is possible that a counterparty would attempt to rely on such a downgrade as a basis for making a demand for adequate assurance of future performance. Depending on the Company’s net position with the counterparty, the demand could be for the posting of collateral. In the absence of expressly agreed provisions that specify the collateral that must be provided, the obligation to supply the collateral requested will be a function of the facts and circumstances of the Company’s situation at the time of the demand. If the Company can reasonably claim that it is willing and financially able to perform its obligations, it may be possible that no collateral would need to be posted or that only an amount equal to two or three months of future payments should be sufficient. The Company does not expect to post any collateral which will have a material adverse impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.
Note 12:13: General Taxes
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the components of general tax expense for the years ended December 31:
202220212020
Property and capital stock$108 $149 $140 
Gross receipts and franchise124 121 116 
Payroll36 39 36 
Other general13 12 11 
Total general taxes$281 $321 $303 
110
  2017 2016 2015
Gross receipts and franchise$110
 $106
 $99
Property and capital stock105
 106
 98
Payroll31
 32
 31
Other general13
 14
 15
Total general taxes$259
 $258
 $243


Table of Contents
Note 13:14: Income Taxes
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the components of income tax expense for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Current income taxes:   
State$26 $72 $
Federal82 75 — 
Total current income taxes$108 $147 $
Deferred income taxes:   
State$24 $10 $49 
Federal57 221 159 
Amortization of deferred investment tax credits(1)(1)(1)
Total deferred income taxes80 230 207 
Provision for income taxes$188 $377 $215 
 2017 2016 2015
Current income taxes     
State$25
 $20
 $10
Federal(1) 1
 
Total current income taxes$24
 $21
 $10
Deferred income taxes     
State$50
 $24
 $32
Federal413
 258
 265
Amortization of deferred investment tax credits(1) (1) (1)
Total deferred income taxes462
 281
 296
Provision for income taxes$486
 $302
 $306
The followingPresented in the table below is a reconciliation between the statutory federal income tax rate and the Company’s effective tax rate for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Income tax at statutory rate21.0 %21.0 %21.0 %
Increases (decreases) resulting from:   
State taxes, net of federal taxes4.1 %3.9 %4.8 %
EADIT(6.5)%(3.6)%(2.1)%
Tax impact due to the sale of HOS— %1.6 %— %
Other, net0.1 %0.1 %(0.4)%
Effective tax rate18.7 %23.0 %23.3 %
 2017 2016 2015
Income tax at statutory rate35.0 % 35.0% 35.0%
Increases (decreases) resulting from:     
State taxes, net of federal taxes5.4 % 3.8% 3.6%
Tax Cuts and Jobs Act13.7 % % %
Other, net(0.8)% 0.4% 0.5%
Effective tax rate53.3 % 39.2% 39.1%
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the TCJA. Substantially all of the provisions of the TCJA are effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2017. The TCJA includes significant changes to the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), including amendments which significantly change the taxation of individuals and business entities, and includes specific provisions related to regulated public utilities. The more significant changes that impact the Company includedPresented in the TCJAtable below are reductions in the corporate federal income tax rate from 35% to 21%, and several technical provisions including, among others, limiting the utilization of net operating losses (“NOLs”) arising after December 31, 2017 to 80% of taxable income with an indefinite carryforward. The specific provisions related to regulated public utilities in the TCJA generally allow for the continued deductibility of interest expense, the elimination of full expensing for tax purposes of certain property acquired after September 27, 2017 and continue certain rate normalization requirements for accelerated depreciation benefits. Non-regulated segments of the Company’s business will be able to take advantage of the full expensing provisions of the TCJA.
Changes in the Code from the TCJA had a material impact on our financial statements in 2017. Under GAAP, specifically Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 740, Income Taxes, the tax effects of changes in tax laws must be recognized in the period in which the law is enacted. ASC 740 also requires deferred income tax assets and liabilities to be measured at the enacted tax rate expected to apply when temporary differences are to be realized or settled. Thus, at the date of enactment, the Company’s deferred income taxes were re-measured based upon the new tax rate. For the Company’s regulated entities, substantially all of the change in deferred income taxes are recorded as either an offset to a regulatory asset or liability because changes are expected to be recovered by or refunded to customers. For the Company’s unregulated operations, the change in deferred income taxes is recorded as a non-cash re-measurement adjustment to earnings.

The staff of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has recognized the complexity of reflecting the impacts of the TCJA, and on December 22, 2017 issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (“SAB 118”) which clarifies accounting for income taxes under ASC 740 if information is not yet available or complete and provides for up to a one year period in which to complete the required analyses and accounting. SAB 118 describes three scenarios or buckets associated with a company’s status of accounting for income tax reform: (1) a company is complete with its accounting for certain effects of tax reform, (2) a company is able to determine a reasonable estimate for certain effects of tax reform and records that estimate as a provisional amount, or (3) a company is not able to determine a reasonable estimate and therefore continues to apply ASC 740, based on the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to the TCJA being enacted. The Company has made a reasonable estimate for the measurement and accounting of certain effects of the TCJA which have been reflected in the December 31, 2017 financial statements. The re-measurement of deferred income taxes at the new federal tax rate increased the 2017 deferred income tax provision by $125 million for the year ending December 31, 2017. Additionally, the accumulated deferred income tax liability decreased by $1.39 billion and regulatory liabilities increased by $1.51 billion, respectively, as of December 31, 2017.
As provided for under SAB 118, the Company has not recorded the impact for certain items under TCJA for which it has not yet been able to gather, prepare and analyze the necessary information in reasonable detail to complete the ASC 740 accounting. For these items, which include the impact of TCJA on state income taxes, the current and deferred income taxes were recognized and measured based on the provisions of the tax laws that were in effect immediately prior to the TCJA being enacted. The current and deferred state taxes are $25 million and $50 million as of December 31, 2017, respectively. The determination of the impact of the income tax effects of these items and the items reflected as provisional amounts will require additional analysis of historical records and further interpretation of the TCJA from yet to be issued U.S. Treasury regulations which will require more time, information and resources than currently available to the Company.
The following table provides the components of the net deferred tax liability as of December 31:
 20222021
Deferred tax assets:  
Advances and contributions$351 $439 
Tax losses and credits19 10 
Regulatory income tax assets203 301 
Pension and other postretirement benefits64 50 
Other140 144 
Total deferred tax assets777 944 
Valuation allowance(11)(10)
Total deferred tax assets, net of allowance$766 $934 
Deferred tax liabilities:  
Property, plant and equipment$2,872 $3,087 
Deferred pension and other postretirement benefits64 69 
Other249 180 
Total deferred tax liabilities3,185 3,336 
Total deferred tax liabilities, net of deferred tax assets$(2,419)$(2,402)
The Company recognized no federal net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. The Company fully utilized its federal NOL carryforwards in 2021 due to the sale of HOS, and therefore, no valuation allowance is required.
111

 2017 2016
Deferred tax assets   
Advances and contributions$395
 $540
Tax losses and credits256
 301
Regulatory income tax assets327
 
Pension and other postretirement benefits96
 173
Other49
 90
Total deferred tax assets1,123
 1,104
Valuation allowance(13) (6)
Total deferred tax assets, net of allowance$1,110
 $1,098
Deferred tax liabilities   
Property, plant and equipment$2,489
 $3,339
Deferred pension and other postretirement benefits69
 126
Other103
 229
Total deferred tax liabilities2,661
 3,694
Total deferred tax liabilities, net of deferred tax assets$(1,551) $(2,596)
Table of Contents
As of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, the Company recognized federal NOL carryforwards of $1.05 billion and $1.23 billion, respectively. The Company believes the federal NOL carryforwards are more likely than not to be recovered and require no valuation allowance. The Company’s federal NOL carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,2021, the Company had state NOLs of $322$240 million and $625$123 million, respectively, a portion of which are offset by a valuation allowance becauseas the Company does not believe these NOLs are more likely than not to be realized. The state NOL carryforwards will begin to expire in 20182023 through 2037.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company had an insignificant amount of Canadian NOL carryforwards and capital loss carryforwards for federal income tax purposes.

2042.
The Company files income tax returns in the United States federal jurisdiction and various state and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years on or before 2012.2015. The Company has state income tax examinations in progress and does not expect material adjustments to result.
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the changes in the Company’s gross liability, excluding interest and penalties, for unrecognized tax benefits:
Balance as of January 1, 2016$233
Increases in current period tax positions10
Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions(74)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$169
Increases in current period tax positions8
Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions(71)
Balance as of December 31, 2017$106
Amount
Balance as of January 1, 2021$122 
Increases in current period tax positions23 
Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions(5)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$140 
Increases in current period tax positions26 
Decreases in prior period measurement of tax positions(8)
Balance as of December 31, 2022$158 
The Company’s tax positions relate primarily to the deductions claimed for repair and maintenance costs on its utility plant. The gross liability was reduced primarily as a result of the Section 481(a) adjustment allocated for the current year when the Company filed the accounting method change with its 2015 tax return. The Company does not anticipate material changes to its unrecognized tax benefits within the next year. As discussed above, the Company utilized its remaining federal NOLs in 2021, and therefore this federal tax attribute will not be available to reduce the federal liabilities for uncertain tax positions or interest accrued as presented on the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements.
If the Company sustains all of its positions as of December 31, 2017,2022, an unrecognized tax benefit of $10 million, excluding interest and penalties, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate. The Company had an insignificantimmaterial amount of interest and penalties related to its tax positions as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016.2021.
The followingPresented in the table summarizesbelow are the changes in the Company’s valuation allowance:
Amount
Balance as of January 1, 2020$21 
Decreases in current period tax positions(2)
Balance as of December 31, 2020$19 
Decreases in current period tax positions(9)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$10 
Increases in current period tax positions
Balance as of December 31, 2022$11 
Balance as of January 1, 2015$10
Decreases in current period tax positions(2)
Balance as of December 31, 2015$8
Decreases in current period tax positions(2)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$6
Increases in current period tax positions7
Balance as of December 31, 2017$13
Note 14:15: Employee Benefits
Overview of Pension and Other Postretirement Benefits Plans
The Company maintains noncontributory defined benefit pension plans covering eligible employees of its regulated utility and shared services operations. Benefits under the plans are based on the employee’s years of service and compensation. The pension plans have been closed for all new employees. The pension plans were closed for most employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. Union employees hired on or after January 1, 2001, except for specific eligible groups specified in the Plan,plan, had their accrued benefit frozen and will be able to receive this benefit as a lump sum upon termination or retirement. Union employees hired on or after January 1, 2001, and non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2006, are provided with a defined contribution plan that includes a 5.25% of base pay Company-funded defined contribution plan.account. The Company does not participate in a multi-employer plan. The Company also has unfunded noncontributory supplemental non-qualifiednonqualified pension plans that provide additional retirement benefits to certain employees.
112

Table of Contents
The Company’s pension funding practice is to contribute at least the greater of the minimum amount required by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 or the normal cost. Further, the Company will consider additional cash contributions and/or available prefunding balances if needed to avoid “at risk” status and benefit restrictions under the Pension Protection Act of 2006 (“PPA”). The Company may also consider increased contributions, based on other financial requirements and the plans’ funded position. Pension expense in excess of the amount contributed to the pension plans is deferred by certain regulated subsidiaries pending future recovery in rates charged for utility services as contributions are made to the plans. See Note 6—3—Regulatory Assets and Liabilities.Matters for additional information. Pension plan assets are invested in a number of actively managed, commingled funds, and limited partnerships including equities, fixed income securities, guaranteed annuity contracts with insurance companies, real estate funds and real estate investment trusts (“REITs”).

In December 2022, the Company amended the American Water Pension Plan (“AWPP”), a tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, to restructure it as of December 31, 2022. The restructuring involved the spin-off of certain inactive participants from the existing AWPP into a separate tax-qualified defined benefit pension plan, AWPP Inactive. Benefits offered to the plan participants remain unchanged. Actuarial gains and losses associated with AWPP Inactive will be amortized over the average remaining life expectancy of the inactive participants, which increases the amortization period from approximately 7 years to 18 years. The longer amortization period is expected to lower the Company’s pre-tax pension expense by approximately $5 million in 2023. The actuarial gains and losses associated with the AWPP will continue to be amortized over the average remaining service period for active participants. The Company remeasured the pension plan obligation and assets for each plan as of December 31, 2022.
The Company maintains other postretirement benefit plans providing varying levels of medical and life insurance to eligible retirees. The retiree welfare plans are closed for union employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. The plans had previously closed for non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2002. The Company’s policy is to fund other postretirement benefit costs up to the amount recoverable through rates. Assets of the plans are invested in a number of actively managed andfunds in the form of separate accounts, commingled funds and limited partnerships, including equities and fixed income securities.
Pension Plan Assets
The investment policy guideline of the pension plan is focused on diversification, improving returns and reducing the volatility of the funded status over a long-term horizon. The investment policy guidelines of the pension plan require thatpostretirement plans focus on the fixed income portfolio has an overall weighted-average credit ratingappropriate strategy given the funded status of A or better by Standard & Poor’s.the plans. None of the Company’s securities are included in pension or other postretirement benefit plan assets. The investment policies’ objectives are focused on reducing the volatility of the plans’ funded status over a long term horizon.
The Company uses fair value for all classes of assets in the calculation of market-related value of plan assets. As of 2017,December 31, 2022, the fair values and asset allocations of the pension plan assets include the American Water Pension Plan, the New York Water Service Corporation Pension Plan,AWPP, AWPP Inactive, and the Shorelands Water Company, Inc. Pension Plan.
As a result of the sale of the Company’s New York subsidiary on January 1, 2022, there was a transfer of plan assets from the Company to Liberty. The assets transferred were not a significant percentage of the Company’s overall pension and other postretirement benefit plans.
113

Table of Contents
Presented in the tables below are the fair values and asset allocations of the pension plan assets as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, by asset category were as follows:category:
Asset Category2023 Target AllocationTotalQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31, 2022
Cash$36 $36 $— $— %
Equity securities:37 %     
U.S. large cap142 142 — — 10 %
U.S. small cap79 79 — — %
International386 264 120 27 %
Real estate fund154 — — 154 11 %
REITs— — — %
Fixed income securities:63 %    
U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds126 119 — %
Corporate bonds418 — 418 — 30 %
Mortgage-backed securities— — %
Municipal bonds21 — 21 — %
Long duration bond fund— — — %
Guarantee annuity contracts34 — — 34 %
Total100 %$1,413 $378 $727 $308 100 %
Asset Category2022 Target AllocationTotalQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31, 2021
Cash$54 $54 $— $— %
Equity securities:50 %     
U.S. large cap217 217 — — 11 %
U.S. small cap113 113 — — %
International516 354 155 26 %
Real estate fund141 — — 141 %
REITs— — — %
Fixed income securities:50 %    
U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds256 249 — 13 %
Corporate bonds601 — 601 — 30 %
Mortgage-backed securities— — — %
Municipal bonds25 — 25 — %
Long duration bond fund10 — %
Guarantee annuity contracts40 — — 40 %
Total100 %$1,991 $647 $1,008 $336 100 %
114

Table of Contents
      Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Percentage
of Plan Assets
as of
  2018      
Asset Category Target
Allocation
 Total    December 31, 2017
Cash   $7
 $7
 $
 $
 
Equity securities: 50%          
U.S. large cap   344
 344
 
 
 21%
U.S. small cap   84
 79
 5
 
 5%
International   295
 2
 149
 144
 18%
Real estate fund   86
 
 
 86
 5%
REITs   26
 
 26
 
 2%
Fixed income securities: 50%         

U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds   200
 180
 20
 
 12%
Corporate bonds   519
 
 519
 
 31%
Mortgage-backed securities   1
 
 1
 
 
Municipal bonds   31
 
 31
 
 2%
Long duration bond fund   8
 8
 
 
 1%
Guarantee annuity contracts   48
 
 
 48
 3%
Total 100% $1,649
 $620
 $751
 $278
 100%

      Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Percentage
of Plan Assets
as of
  2017      
Asset Category Target
Allocation
 Total    December 31, 2016
Cash   $10
 $10
 $
 $
 
Equity Securities: 60%          
U.S. large cap   316
 316
 
 
 22%
U.S. small cap   134
 134
 
 
 9%
International   259
 
 259
 
 18%
Real estate fund   101
 
 
 101
 7%
REITs   24
 
 24
 
 2%
Fixed income securities: 40%         

U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds   150
 114
 36
 
 11%
Corporate bonds   391
 
 391
 
 27%
Mortgage-backed securities   3
 
 3
 
 
Long duration bond fund   7
 7
 
 
 1%
Guarantee annuity contracts   48
 
 9
 39
 3%
Total 100% $1,443
 $581
 $722
 $140
 100%
The followingPresented in the tables presentbelow are a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the fair value measurements using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively:
Level 3
Balance as of January 1, 2022$336 
Actual return on assets(1)
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net(27)
Balance as of December 31, 2022$308 
 Level 3
Balance as of January 1, 2017$140
Actual return on assets2
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net136
Balance as of December 31, 2017$278
Level 3
Balance as of January 1, 2021$356 
Actual return on assets41 
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net(61)
Balance as of December 31, 2021$336 
 Level 3
Balance as of January 1, 2016$136
Actual return on assets8
Purchases, issuances and settlements, net(4)
Balance as of December 31, 2016$140
Other Postretirement Benefit Plan Assets
The Company’s postretirement benefit plans have different levels of funded status and the assets are held under various trusts. The investments and risk mitigation strategies for the plans are tailored specifically for each trust. In setting new strategic asset mixes, consideration is given to the likelihood that the selected asset allocation will effectively fund the projected plan liabilities and meet the risk tolerance criteria of the Company. The Company periodically updates the long-term, strategic asset allocations for these plans through asset liability studies and uses various analytics to determine the optimal asset allocation. Considerations include plan liability characteristics, liquidity needs, funding requirements, expected rates of return and the distribution of returns. Strategies to address the goal of ensuring sufficient assets to pay benefits include target allocations to a broad array of asset classes
Upon evaluating prior plan changes, Company funding and within asset classes, strategies are employed to provide adequate returns, diversification and liquidity.
In 2012,market performance, in December 2022, the Company implementedcompleted plan amendments to spin-off and merge a de-risking strategy forportion of the American Water PensionRetiree Welfare Plan after conducting an asset-liability study(“Retiree Welfare Plan”), with and into the Company’s medical plan for active employees (“Active Medical Plan”), in order to reducerepurpose the volatility of the funded status of the plan. As part of the de-risking strategy, the Company revised the asset allocations to increase the matching characteristics of fixed-income assets relative to liabilities. The fixed incomeover-funded portion of the portfolio was designedBargained Retiree Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (“Bargained VEBA”) trust. Benefits offered to match the bond-like and long-dated natureplan participants remain unchanged. As a result of the postretirement liabilities. In 2017,these changes, effective December 31, 2022, the Company further increased its exposure to liability-driven investing and increased its fixed-income allocation to 50%, uptransferred investment assets from 40%, in an effort to further decrease the funded status volatility ofBargained VEBA into the plan and hedge the portfolio from movements in interest rates.

In 2012, the Company also implemented a de-risking strategyexisting trust maintained for the benefit of Active Medical Plan participants (“Active VEBA”). The transfer of these Bargained VEBA investment assets into the Active VEBA permits access to approximately $194 million of assets for purposes of paying active union employee medical bargaining trust withinbenefits. The Company recorded the plan to minimize volatility. In 2017, the Company conductedtransfer of assets as a new asset-liability study that indicated medical trend inflation that outpaced the Consumer Price Indexnegative contribution and therefore did not record a gain or loss, as permitted by more than 2%accounting guidance. See Note 18—Fair Value of Financial Information, for additional information on accounting for the last 20 years. Given continuously rising medical costs, the Company decided to increase theassets as investments in debt and equity exposuresecurities as of the portfolio to 30%, up from 20%, while reducing the fixed-income portion of the portfolio from 80% to 70%. The Company also conducted an asset-liability study for the Post-Retirement Non-Bargaining Medical Plan. Its allocation was adjusted to make it more conservative, reducing the equity allocation from 70% to 60% and increasing the fixed-income allocation from 30% to 40%. The Post-Retirement Medical Non-Bargaining plan’s equity allocation was reduced due to the cap on benefits for some non-union participants and resultant reduction in the plan’s liabilities. These changes will take place in 2018.December 31, 2022.
The Company engages third partythird-party investment managers for all invested assets. Managers are not permitted to invest outside of the asset class (e.g., fixed income, equity, alternatives) or strategy for which they have been appointed. Investment management agreements and recurring performance and attribution analysis are used as tools to ensure investment managers invest solely within the investment strategy they have been provided. Futures and options may be used to adjust portfolio duration to align with a plan’s targeted investment policy.
In order to minimize asset volatility relative to the liabilities, a portion of plan assets is allocated to long duration fixed income investments that are exposed to interest rate risk. Increases in interest rates generally will result in a decline in the value of fixed income assets while reducing the present value of the liabilities. Conversely, rate decreases will increase fixed income assets, partially offsetting the related increase in the liabilities. Within equities, risk is mitigated by constructing a portfolio that is broadly diversified by geography, market capitalization, manager mandate size, investment style and process. For the Bargained VEBA trust, its asset structure is designed to meet the cash flows of the liabilities. This design reduces the plan’s exposure to changes in interest rates.
Actual allocations to each asset class vary from target allocations due to periodic investment strategy updates, market value fluctuations, the length of time it takes to fully implement investment allocations, and the timing of benefit payments and contributions. The asset allocation is rebalanced on a quarterly basis, if necessary. The Retiree Welfare Plan is funded by the Bargained VEBA trust, the Non-Bargained Retiree Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (“Non-Bargained VEBA”) Trust assets include the American Water Post-Retirement Medical Benefits Bargaining Plan, the New York Water Service Corporation Post-Retirement Medical Benefits Bargaining Plan, the American Water Post-Retirement Medical Benefits Non-Bargaining Plan,trust, and the American Water Life Insurance Voluntary Employees’ Beneficiary Association (“Life VEBA”) Trust.

115

Table of Contents
ThePresented in the tables below are the fair values and asset allocations of the postretirement benefit plan assets as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively, by asset category, were as follows:category:
Asset Category2023 Target AllocationTotalQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Percentage of Plan Assets as of December 31, 2022
Bargained VEBA:      
Cash$$$— $— %
Equity securities:— %     
U.S. large cap— — — — — %
International— — — — — %
Fixed income securities:100 %    
U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds131 72 59 — 97 %
Long duration bond fund— — %
Total bargained VEBA100 %$135 $76 $59 $— 100 %
Non-bargained VEBA:      
Cash$$$— $— %
Equity securities:60 %     
U.S. large cap40 40 — — 34 %
International29 29 — — 25 %
Fixed income securities:40 %    
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
47 — 47 — 40 %
Total non-bargained VEBA100 %$117 $70 $47 $— 100 %
Life VEBA:      
Cash$$$— $— 100 %
Equity securities:— %     
U.S. large cap— — — — — %
Fixed income securities:100 %    
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
— — — — — %
Total life VEBA100 %$$$— $— 100 %
Total100 %$254 $148 $106 $— 100 %
(a)Includes cash for margin requirements.
      Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Percentage
of Plan Assets
as of
  2018      
Asset Category Target Allocation Total    December 31, 2017
Bargain VEBA:            
Cash   $18
 $18
 $
 $
 
Equity securities: 30%          
U.S. large cap   44
 44
 
 
 10%
International   51
 51
 
 
 12%
Fixed income securities: 70%          
U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds   48
 21
 27
 
 11%
Corporate bonds   233
 
 233
 
 55%
Municipal bonds   26
 
 26
 
 6%
Long duration bond fund   4
 4
 
 
 1%
Future and option contracts (a)
   2
 2
 
 
 5%
Total bargain VEBA 100% $426
 $140
 $286
 $
 100%
Non-bargain VEBA:            
Cash   $1
 $1
 $
 $
 
Equity securities: 60%          
U.S. large cap   53
 53
 
 
 37%
U.S. small cap   5
 5
 
 
 4%
International   47
 47
 
 
 33%
Fixed income securities: 40%          
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
   36
 36
 
 
 26%
Total non-bargain VEBA 100% $142
 $142
 $
 $
 100%
Life VEBA:            
Cash   $3
 $3
 $
 $
 
Equity securities: 70%          
U.S. large cap   3
 3
 
 
 38%
Fixed income securities: 30%          
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
   2
 2
 
 
 62%
Total life VEBA 100% $8
 $8
 $
 $
 100%
Total 100% $576
 $290
 $286
 $
 100%
116
(a)Includes cash for margin requirements.


Table of Contents
     Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
 Significant Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
 Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
 Percentage
of Plan Assets
as of
 2017   
Asset Category Target Allocation Total December 31, 2016Asset Category2022 Target AllocationTotalQuoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)Significant Observable Inputs (Level 2)Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)Percentage of Plan Assets as of 12/31/2021
Bargain VEBA:            
Bargained VEBA:Bargained VEBA:      
CashCash$10 $10 $— $— %
Equity securities: 20%          Equity securities:%     
U.S. large cap   $35
 $35
 $
 $
 9%U.S. large cap18 18 — — %
International   40
 40
 
 
 10%International— — — %
Fixed income securities: 80%          Fixed income securities:96 %    
U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds   84
 84
 
 
 22%U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds363 279 84 — 91 %
Corporate bonds   223
 
 223
 
 58%
Long duration bond fund   3
 3
 
 
 1%Long duration bond fund— — %
Future and option contracts (a)
   1
 1
 
 
 
Total bargain VEBA 100% $386
 $163
 $223
 $
 100%
Non-bargain VEBA:            
Total bargained VEBATotal bargained VEBA100 %$397 $313 $84 $— 100 %
Non-bargained VEBA:Non-bargained VEBA:      
Cash   $2
 $2
 $
 $
 
Cash$$$— $— — %
Equity securities: 70%          Equity securities:60 %     
U.S. large cap   29
 29
 
 
 22%U.S. large cap54 54 — — 39 %
U.S. small cap   30
 30
 
 
 22%
International   37
 37
 
 
 28%International35 35 — — 25 %
Fixed income securities: 30%          Fixed income securities:40 %    
Core fixed income bond fund   36
 36
 
 
 28%
Total non-bargain VEBA 100% $134
 $134
 $
 $
 100%
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
49 — 49 — 36 %
Total non-bargained VEBATotal non-bargained VEBA100 %$140 $91 $49 $— 100 %
Life VEBA:            Life VEBA:      
CashCash$$$— $— 100 %
Equity securities: 70%          Equity securities:70 %     
U.S. large cap   $3
 $3
 $
 $
 60%U.S. large cap$— $— $— $— — %
Fixed income securities: 30%          Fixed income securities:30 %    
Core fixed income bond fund   2
 2
 
 
 40%
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
Core fixed income bond fund (a)
— — — — — %
Total life VEBA 100% $5
 $5
 $
 $
 100%Total life VEBA100 %$$$— $— 100 %
Total 100% $525
 $302
 $223
 $
 100%Total100 %$538 $405 $133 $— 100 %
(a)Includes cash for margin requirements.
(a)Includes cash for margin requirements.
Valuation Techniques Used to Determine Fair Value
Cash—Cash and investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased, including certain short-term fixed-income securities, are considered cash and are included in the recurring fair value measurements hierarchy as Level 1.
Equity securities—For equity securities, the trustees obtain prices from pricing services, whose prices are obtained from direct feeds from market exchanges, that the Company is able to independently corroborate. EquityCertain equity securities are valued based on quoted prices in active markets and categorized as Level 1. CertainOther equities, such as international securities held in the pension plan, are invested in commingled funds and/or limited partnerships. These funds are valued to reflect the plan fund’s interest in the fund based on the reported year-end net asset value. Since net asset value is not directly observable or not available on a nationally recognized securities exchange for the commingled funds, they are categorized as Level 2. For limited partnerships, the assets as a whole are categorized as levelLevel 3 due to the fact that the partnership provides the pricing and the pricing inputs are less readily observable. In addition, the limited partnership vehicle cannot be readily traded.
Fixed-income securities—The majority of U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds have been categorized as Level 1 because they trade in highly-liquid and transparent markets and their prices can be corroborated. The fair values of corporate bonds, mortgage backed securities, and certain government bonds are based on prices that reflect observable market information, such as actual trade information of similar securities. They are categorized as Level 2 because the valuations are calculated using models which utilize actively traded market data that the Company can corroborate.

Guaranteed annuity contracts are categorized as Level 3 because the investments are not publicly quoted. Since these market values are determined by the provider, they are not highly observable and have been categorized as Level 3. Exchange-traded future and option positions are reported in accordance with changes in variation margins that are settled daily. Exchange-traded options and futures, for which market quotations are readily available, are valued at the last reported sale price or official closing price on the primary market or exchange on which they are traded and are classified as Level 1.
117

Table of Contents
Real estate fund—Real estate fund is categorized as Level 3 as the fund uses significant unobservable inputs for fair value measurement and the vehicle is in the form of a limited partnership.
REITs—REITs are invested in commingled funds. Commingled funds are valued to reflect the plan fund’s interest in the fund based on the reported year-end net asset value. Since the net asset value is not directly observable for the commingled funds, they are categorized as Level 2.
The followingGuaranteed annuity contracts—Guaranteed annuity contracts are categorized as Level 3 because the investments are not publicly quoted. Since these market values are determined by the provider, they are not highly observable and have been categorized as Level 3. Exchange-traded future and option positions are reported in accordance with changes in variation margins that are settled daily.
118

Table of Contents
Benefit Obligations, Plan Assets and Funded Status
Presented in the table providesbelow is a rollforward of the changes in the benefit obligation and plan assets for the two most recent two years, for all plans combined:
 Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
 2022202120222021
Change in benefit obligation:    
Benefit obligation as of January 1,$2,294 $2,386 $342 $382 
Service cost30 36 
Interest cost64 64 10 10 
Plan participants' contributions— — 
Plan amendments— — — 
Actuarial loss (gain)(582)(46)(77)(26)
Divestiture(86)— (4)— 
Settlements (a)
— (6)— — 
Gross benefits paid(142)(140)(28)(31)
Federal subsidy— — — 
Benefit obligation as of December 31,$1,578 $2,294 $255 $342 
Change in plan assets:    
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1,$1,991 $1,990 $538 $556 
Actual return on plan assets(401)108 (68)
Employer contributions39 39 12 
Plan participants' contributions— — 
VEBA transfer— — (194)— 
Divestiture(74)— (9)— 
Settlements (a)
— (6)— — 
Benefits paid(142)(140)(28)(30)
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31,$1,413 $1,991 $254 $538 
Funded value as of December 31,$(165)$(303)$(1)$196 
Amounts recognized on the balance sheet:    
Noncurrent asset$75 $— $— $193 
Current liability(5)(2)— — 
Noncurrent liability(235)(285)(1)(1)
(Liabilities) assets related to assets held for sale (b)
— (16)— 
Net amount recognized$(165)$(303)$(1)$196 
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Change in benefit obligation:       
Benefit obligation as of January 1,$1,864
 $1,720
 $610
 $667
Service cost33
 32
 10
 12
Interest cost80
 80
 26
 28
Plan participants' contributions
 
 2
 2
Plan amendments
 
 
 (156)
Actuarial (gain) loss118
 100
 (9) 82
Acquisitions9
 
 
 
Settlements
 (3) 
 
Gross benefits paid(70) (65) (26) (26)
Federal subsidy
 
 1
 1
Benefit obligation as of December 31,$2,034
 $1,864
 $614
 $610
Change in plan assets:       
Fair value of plan assets as of January 1,$1,443
 $1,376
 $525
 $500
Actual return on plan assets227
 99
 69
 32
Employer contributions42
 36
 6
 17
Plan participants' contributions
 
 2
 2
Settlements
 (3) 
 
Acquisitions7
 
 
 
Benefits paid(70) (65) (26) (26)
Fair value of plan assets as of December 31,$1,649
 $1,443
 $576
 $525
Funded value as of December 31,$(385) $(421) $(38) $(85)
Amounts recognized in the balance sheet consist of:       
Noncurrent asset$
 $
 $2
 $2
Current liability(2) (2) 
 
Noncurrent liability(383) (419) (40) (87)
Net amount recognized$(385) $(421) $(38) $(85)
(a)The Company paid $6 million of a lump sum payment distributions from the Company’s New York Water Service Corporation Pension Plan for the year ended December 31, 2021.
On July 31, 2016, the other postretirement benefit plan was re-measured to reflect a plan amendment, which capped benefits for certain non-union plan participants. The re-measurement included an $156 million reduction in future benefits payable to plan participants, and resulted in an $89 million reduction(b)These balances are related to the net accrued postretirement benefit obligation. The plan amendment will be amortized over 10.2 years,sale of the average future working lifetimeCompany’s New York subsidiary, which was completed on January 1, 2022, and are included in assets held for sale and liabilities related to full eligibility ageassets held for all plan participants.sale on the Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2021. See Note 5—Acquisitions and Divestitures for additional information.

119

Table of Contents
The followingPresented in the table providesbelow are the components of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income and regulatory assets that have not been recognized as components of periodic benefit costs as of December 31:
 Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
 2022202120222021
Net actuarial loss$289 $381 $45 $35 
Prior service credit(10)(14)(145)(186)
Net amount recognized$279 $367 $(100)$(151)
Regulatory assets (liabilities)$251 $317 $(100)$(151)
Accumulated other comprehensive income28 50 — — 
Total$279 $367 $(100)$(151)
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2017 2016 2017 2016
Net actuarial loss$416
 $466
 $108
 $170
Prior service cost (credit)2
 2
 (140) (158)
Net amount recognized$418
 $468
 $(32) $12
        
Regulatory assets (liabilities)$270
 $300
 $(32) $12
Accumulated other comprehensive income148
 168
 
 
Total$418
 $468
 $(32) $12
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016,Presented in the tables below are the aggregate projected benefit obligation, accumulated benefit obligation and aggregate fair value of plan assets for pension plans with a projected obligation in excess of plan assets were as follows:of December 31, 2022 and 2021:
Projected Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plans' AssetsProjected Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plans' Assets
2017 2016 20222021
Projected benefit obligation$2,034
 $1,864
Projected benefit obligation$872 $2,294 
Fair value of plan assets1,649
 1,443
Fair value of plan assets632 1,991 
   
Accumulated Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plans' Assets Accumulated Benefit Obligation Exceeds the Fair Value of Plans' Assets
2017 2016 20222021
Accumulated benefit obligation$1,888
 $1,722
Accumulated benefit obligation$793 $2,138 
Fair value of plan assets1,649
 1,443
Fair value of plan assets632 1,991 
The accumulated postretirement benefit obligation exceeds plan assets exceed benefit obligations for all of the Company’s other postretirement benefit plans, except for the New York Water Medical Benefits Bargaining Trust.Northern Illinois Retiree Welfare Plan, of which the accumulated postretirement benefit obligation is inconsequential for all periods presented.
In August 2006, the PPA was signed into law in the U.S. Contributions
The PPA replaces the funding requirements for defined benefit pension plans by requiringrequires that defined benefit plans contribute to 100% of the current liability funding target over seven years. Defined benefit plans with a funding status of less than 80% of the current liability are defined as being “at risk” and additional funding requirements and benefit restrictions may apply. The PPA was effective for the 2008 plan year with short-term phase-in provisions for both the funding target and at-risk determination. The Company’s qualified defined benefit plan is currently funded above the at-risk threshold, and therefore the Company expects that the plans will not be subject to the “at risk” funding requirements of the PPA. The Company is proactively monitoring the plan’s funded status and projected contributions under the law to appropriately manage the potential impact on cash requirements.
Minimum funding requirements for the qualified defined benefit pension plan are determined by government regulations and not by accounting pronouncements. The Company plans to contribute amounts at least equal to theor greater ofthan the minimum required contributions or the normal cost in 20182023 to the qualified pension plans. The Company plans to contribute to its 2018 other postretirement benefit cost for rate-making purposes.Contributions may be in the form of cash contributions as well as available prefunding balances.
InformationPresented in the table below is information about the expected cash flows for the pension and postretirement benefit plans is as follows:plans:
Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
2023 expected employer contributions:
To plan trusts$39 $— 
To plan participants— 
120

Table of Contents
 Pension
Benefits
 Other
Benefits
2018 expected employer contributions:   
To plan trusts$39
 $
To plan participants2
 
Estimated Future Benefit Payments

The followingPresented in the table reflectsbelow are the net benefits expected to be paid from the plan assets or the Company’s assets:
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 Expected Benefit
Payments
 Expected Benefit
Payments
 Expected Federal
Subsidy Payments
2018$77
 $29
 $2
201983
 31
 2
202089
 32
 2
202194
 34
 2
202299
 35
 2
2022-2026577
 192
 12
 Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
 Expected Benefit PaymentsExpected Benefit PaymentsExpected Federal Subsidy Payments
2023$117 $24 $
2024115 24 
2025117 25 
2026118 24 
2027119 24 
2028-2032585 108 
Because the above amounts are net benefits, plan participants’ contributions have been excluded from the expected benefits.
Assumptions
Accounting for pensions and other postretirement benefits requires an extensive use of assumptions about the discount rate, expected return on plan assets, the rate of future compensation increases received by the Company’s employees, mortality, turnover and medical costs. Each assumption is reviewed annually. The assumptions are selected to represent the average expected experience over time and may differ in any one year from actual experience due to changes in capital markets and the overall economy. These differences will impact the amount of pension and other postretirement benefit expense that the Company recognizes.
ThePresented in the table below are the significant assumptions related to the Company’s pension and other postretirement benefit plans were as follows:plans:
 Pension BenefitsOther Benefits
 202220212020202220212020
Weighted average assumptions used to determine December 31 benefit obligations:      
Discount rate5.58%2.94%2.74%5.60%2.90%2.56%
Rate of compensation increase3.51%3.51%3.51%N/AN/AN/A
Medical trendN/AN/AN/Agraded fromgraded fromgraded from
    7.00% in 20236.00% in 20226.25% in 2021
    to 5.00% in 2031+to 5.00% in 2026+to 5.00% in 2026+
Weighted average assumptions used to determine net periodic cost:      
Discount rate2.94%2.74%3.44%2.90%2.56%3.36%
Expected return on plan assets6.50%6.50%6.50%3.60%3.67%3.68%
Rate of compensation increase3.51%3.51%2.97%N/AN/AN/A
Medical trendN/AN/AN/Agraded fromgraded fromgraded from
    6.00% in 20226.25% in 20216.50% in 2020
    to 5.00% in 2026+to 5.00% in 2026+to 5.00% in 2026+
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
 2017 2016 2015 2017 2016 2015
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine December 31 benefit obligations:           
Discount rate3.75% 4.28% 4.66% 3.73% 4.26% 4.67%
Rate of compensation increase3.02% 3.07% 3.10% N/A N/A N/A
Medical trendN/A N/A N/A graded from graded from graded from
       7.00% in 2018 7.00% in 2017 6.50% in 2016
       to 4.50% in 2026+ to 5.00% in 2021+ to 5.00% in 2021+
Weighted-average assumptions used to determine net periodic cost:           
Discount rate4.28% 4.66% 4.24% 4.26% 3.66% 4.24%
Expected return on plan assets6.49% 7.02% 6.91% 5.09% 5.37% 4.92%
Rate of compensation increase3.07% 3.10% 3.12% N/A N/A N/A
Medical trendN/A N/A N/A graded from graded from graded from
       7.00%  in 2017 6.50%  in 2016 6.75%  in 2015
       to 5% in 2021+ to 5.00% in 2021+ to 5.00% in 2021+
Note: N/A - AssumptionNOTE     “N/A” in the table above means assumption is not applicable.
The discount rate assumption was determined for the pension and postretirement benefit plans independently. At year-end 2011, theThe Company began usinguses an approach that approximates the process of settlement of obligations tailored to the plans’ expected cash flows by matching the plans’ cash flows to the coupons and expected maturity values of individually selected bonds. The yield curve was developed for a universe containing the majority of U.S.-issued AA-graded corporate bonds, all of which were non-callable (or callable with make-whole provisions). Historically, for each plan, the discount rate was developed at the level equivalent rate that would produce the same present value as that using spot rates aligned with the projected benefit payments.

121

Table of Contents
The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is based on historical and projected rates of return, prior to administrative and investment management fees, for current and planned asset classes in the plans’ investment portfolios. Assumed projected rates of return for each of the plans’ projected asset classes were selected after analyzing historical experience and future expectations of the returns and volatility of the various asset classes. Based on the target asset allocation for each asset class, the overall expected rate of return for the portfolio was developed, adjusted for historical and expected experience of active portfolio management results compared to the benchmark returns and for the effect of expenses paid from plan assets.returns. The Company’s pension expense increases as the expected return on assets decreases. The Company used an expected return on plan assets of 6.49%6.50% to estimate its 20172022 pension benefit costs, and an expected blended return based on weighted assets of 5.09%3.60% to estimate its 20172022 other postretirement benefit costs.
InFor the determination of year end 2014 projected benefit plan obligations,years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company adopted a new table based onCompany’s mortality assumption utilized the Society of Actuaries RP 2014 mortality table including a generational BB-2D projection scale. The adoption resulted in a significant increase to pension and other postretirement benefit plans’ projected benefit obligations. In 2015 a new MP 2015 Projection Scale was issued, but not adopted by the Company since all of the experience upon which the MP 2015 Projection Scale is based was considered by the Company in selecting its 2014 assumptions. For year-end 2017, the Company retained the Society of Actuaries RP-2014 mortality table as itsPri-2012 base mortality table but adoptedand the new MP-2017 generational projection scale to projectMP-2021 mortality improvements after 2006.improvement scale. For the year ended December 31, 2020, the Company’s mortality assumption utilized the Pri-2012 base mortality table and the MP-2020 mortality improvement scale.
Assumed health care cost trend rates have a significant effect onComponents of Net Periodic Benefit Cost
Presented in the amounts reported for the other postretirement benefit plans. The health care cost trend rate is based on historical rates and expected market conditions. A one-percentage-point change in assumed health care cost trend rates would have the following effects:
 One-Percentage-Point
Increase
 One-Percentage-Point
Decrease
Effect on total of service and interest cost components$5
 $(4)
Effect on other postretirement benefit obligation73
 (60)
The following table providesbelow are the components of net periodic benefit costs for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Components of net periodic pension benefit cost:   
Service cost$30 $36 $31 
Interest cost64 64 73 
Expected return on plan assets(122)(126)(111)
Amortization of prior service (credit) cost(3)(3)(3)
Amortization of actuarial loss21 27 30 
Settlements (a)
— — 
Net periodic pension benefit cost$(10)$(2)$21 
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:   
Current year actuarial (gain) loss$(14)$$12 
Amortization of actuarial loss(3)(4)(3)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income(17)(3)
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and other comprehensive income$(27)$(5)$30 
Components of net periodic other postretirement benefit (credit) cost:   
Service cost$$$
Interest cost10 10 12 
Expected return on plan assets(19)(21)(19)
Amortization of prior service credit(31)(32)(34)
Amortization of actuarial loss— — 
Net periodic other postretirement benefit (credit) cost$(37)$(39)$(35)
 2017 2016 2015
Components of net periodic pension benefit cost:     
Service cost$33
 $32
 $37
Interest cost80
 80
 74
Expected return on plan assets(93) (95) (97)
Amortization of:     
Prior service cost (credit)1
 1
 1
Actuarial (gain) loss34
 27
 25
Net periodic pension benefit cost$55
 $45
 $40
Other changes in plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive income:     
Amortization of prior service credit (cost)$
 $
 $
Current year actuarial (gain) loss(7) 21
 10
Amortization of actuarial gain (loss)(7) (6) (5)
Total recognized in other comprehensive income$(14) $15
 $5
Total recognized in net periodic benefit cost and comprehensive income$41
 $60
 $45
Components of net periodic other postretirement benefit cost:     
Service cost$10
 $12
 $14
Interest cost26
 28
 30
Expected return on plan assets(26) (27) (26)
Amortization of:     
Prior service cost (credit)(18) (9) (2)
Actuarial (gain) loss10
 5
 5
Net periodic other postretirement benefit cost$2
 $9
 $21

The(a)Due to the amount of lump sum payment distributions from the Company’s policy is to recognize curtailments when the total expected future serviceNew York Water Service Corporation Pension Plan, settlement charges of plan participants is reduced by greaterless than 10% due to an event that results in terminations and/or retirements.
Cumulative gains and losses that are in excess of 10% of the greater of either the projected benefit obligation or the fair value of plan assets are amortized over the expected average remaining future service of the current active membership$1 million were recorded for the plans.
The estimated amounts that will be amortized from accumulated other comprehensive income andyear ended December 31, 2021. In accordance with existing regulatory accounting treatment, the Company has maintained the settlement charge in regulatory assets into net periodic benefit coston the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The amount is being amortized in 2018 are as follows:
 Pension Benefits Other Benefits
Actuarial (gain) loss$27
 $4
Prior service cost (credit)1
 (18)
Total$28
 $(14)
accordance with existing regulatory practice.
Savings Plans for Employees
The Company maintains 401(k) savings plans that allow employees to save for retirement on a tax-deferred basis. Employees can make contributions that are invested at their direction in one or more funds. The Company makes matching contributions based on a percentage of an employee’s contribution, subject to certain limitations. Due to the Company’s discontinuing new entrants into the defined benefit pension plan, on January 1, 2006, the Company began providing an additional 5.25% of base pay defined contribution benefit for union employees hired on or after January 1, 2001 and non-union employees hired on or after January 1, 2006. PlanThe Company’s 401(k) savings plan expenses totaled $13 million, $9$14 million and $9$12 million for 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 2015,2020, respectively. Additionally, the Company’s 5.25% of base pay defined contribution benefit expenses totaled $16 million, $16 million and $15 million for 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. All of the Company’s contributions are invested in one or more funds at the direction of the employees.
122

Table of Contents
Note 15:16: Commitments and Contingencies
Commitments have been made in connection with certain construction programs. The estimated capital expenditures required under legal and binding contractual obligations amounted to $475$756 million as of December 31, 2017.2022.
The Company’s regulated subsidiaries maintain agreements with other water purveyors for the purchase of water to supplement their water supply. ThePresented in the table below are the future annual commitments related to minimum quantities of purchased water having non-cancelable terms are as follows:contracts:
YearAmount
2018$59
201965
202065
202165
202264
Thereafter661
Amount
2023$68 
202454 
202553 
202652 
202752 
Thereafter501 
The Company enters into agreements for the provision of services to water and wastewater facilities for the United StatesU.S. military, municipalities and other customers. The Company’s military agreements expire between 2051 and 2068 and have remaining performance commitments as measured by estimated remaining contract revenue of $3.6 billion as of December 31, 2017. The military agreements are subject to customary termination provisions held by the U.S. government prior to the agreed upon contract expiration. The Company’s O&M agreements with municipalities and other customers expire between 2018 and 2038 and have remaining performance commitments as measured by estimated remaining contract revenue of $711 million as of December 31, 2017. Some ofSee Note 4—Revenue Recognition for additional information regarding the Company’s long-term contracts to operate and maintain a municipality’s, federal government’s or other party’s water or wastewater treatment and delivery facilities include responsibility for certain maintenance for some of those facilities, in exchange for an annual fee. Unless specifically required to perform certain maintenance activities, the maintenance costs are recognized when the maintenance is performed.

performance obligations.
Contingencies
The Company is routinely involved in legal actions incident to the normal conduct of its business. As of December 31, 2017,2022, the Company has accrued approximately $135$5 million of probable loss contingencies and has estimated that the maximum amount of losses associated with reasonably possible loss contingencies that can be reasonably estimated is $27$3 million. For certain matters, claims and actions, the Company is unable to estimate possible losses. The Company believes that damages or settlements, if any, recovered by plaintiffs in such matters, claims or actions, other than as described in this Note 15—16—Commitments and Contingencies, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company.
West Virginia Elk River Freedom Industries Chemical Spill
Background
On January 9, 2014, a chemical storage tank owned by Freedom Industries, Inc. leaked two substances, 4-methylcyclohexane methanol (“MCHM”), and PPH/DiPPH, a mix of polyglycol ethers, into the Elk River near the West Virginia-American Water Company (“WVAWC”) treatment plant intake in Charleston, West Virginia. After having been alerted to the leak of MCHM by the West Virginia Department of Environmental Protection, WVAWC took immediate steps to gather more information about MCHM, augment its treatment process as a precaution, and begin consultations with federal, state and local public health officials. As soon as possible after it was determined that the augmented treatment process would not fully remove the MCHM, a joint decision was reached in consultation with the West Virginia Bureau for Public Health to issue a “Do Not Use” order for all of its approximately 93,000 customer accounts in parts of nine West Virginia counties served by the Charleston treatment plant. By January 18, 2014, none of WVAWC’s customers were subject to the Do Not Use order.
Following the Freedom Industries chemical spill, numerous lawsuits were filed against WVAWC and certain other Company affiliated entities (collectively, the “American Water Defendants”) with respect to this matter in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia or West Virginia Circuit Courts in Kanawha, Boone and Putnam counties, and to date, more than 70 cases remain pending. Four of the cases pending before the U.S. district court were consolidated for purposes of discovery, and an amended consolidated class action complaint for those cases (the “Federal action”) was filed in December 2014 by several plaintiffs. In January 2016, all of the then-filed state court cases were referred to West Virginia’s Mass Litigation Panel for further proceedings, which have been stayed until April 22, 2018 pending the approval by the court in the Federal action of a global agreement to settle all of such cases, as described below. The court in the Federal action has continued the start of the trial indefinitely pending ongoing settlement approval activities.
Proposed Global Class Action Settlement
In October 2016, the court in the Federal action approved the preliminary principles, terms and conditions of a binding global agreement in principle to settle claims among the American Water Defendants, and all class members, putative class members, claimants and potential claimants, arising out of the Freedom Industries chemical spill. On April 27, 2017, the parties filed with the court in the Federal action a proposed settlement agreement providing details of the terms of the settlement of these matters and requesting that the court in the Federal action grant preliminary approval of such settlement. On July 6, 2017, the court in the Federal action issued an opinion denying without prejudice the joint motion for preliminary approval of the Settlement. On August 25, 2017, the parties filed a proposed amended settlement agreement and related materials addressing the matters set forth in the July 6, 2017 order.
On September 21, 2017, the court in the Federal action issued an order granting preliminary approval of a settlement class and proposed class action settlement (the “Settlement”) with respect to claims against the American Water Defendants by all putative class members (collectively, the “Plaintiffs”) for all claims and potential claims arising out of the Freedom Industries chemical spill. The Settlement proposes a global resolution of all federal and state litigation and potential claims against the American Water Defendants and their insurers. Under the terms and conditions of the Settlement and the proposed amended settlement agreement, the American Water Defendants have not admitted, and will not admit, any fault or liability for any of the allegations made by the Plaintiffs in any of the actions to be resolved. Under federal class action rules, claimants had the right, until December 8, 2017, to elect to opt out of the final Settlement, in which case such claimant would not receive any benefit from or be bound by the terms of the Settlement. As of January 31, 2018, less than 100 of the 225,000 estimated putative Plaintiffs have submitted opt-out notices. The deadline to file a claim in the Settlement is February 21, 2018.

The proposed aggregate pre-tax amount of the Settlement with respect to the Company is $126 million. The aggregate portion of the Settlement to be contributed by WVAWC, net of insurance recoveries, is $43 million (approximately $26 million after-tax), taking into account the September 2017 settlement with one of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers discussed below. Another defendant to the Settlement is to contribute up to $25 million to the Settlement. Two of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers, which provide an aggregate of $50 million in insurance coverage to the Company under these policies, had been originally requested to participate in the Settlement at the time of the initial filing of the binding agreement in principle with the court in the Federal action, but did not agree to do so at that time. WVAWC filed a lawsuit against one of these carriers alleging that the carrier’s failure to agree to participate in the Settlement constituted a breach of contract. On September 19, 2017, the Company and the insurance carrier settled this lawsuit for $22 million, out of a maximum of $25 million in potential coverage under the terms of the relevant policy, in exchange for a full release by the Company and WVAWC of all claims against the insurance carrier related to the Freedom Industries chemical spill. WVAWC and the settling insurer have agreed to stay this litigation pending final approval of the Settlement. The Company and WVAWC continue to pursue vigorously their rights to insurance coverage for contributions by WVAWC to the Settlement in mandatory arbitration with the remaining non-participating carrier. This arbitration proceeding remains pending.
The proposed Settlement would establish a two-tier settlement fund for the payment of claims, comprised of (i) a simple claim fund, which is also referred to as the “guaranteed fund,” of $76 million, of which $29 million will be contributed by WVAWC, including insurance deductibles, and $47 million would be contributed by two of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers, and (ii) an individual review claim fund of up to $50 million, of which up to $14 million would be contributed by WVAWC and up to $36 million would be contributed by a number of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers. Separately, up to $25 million would be contributed to the guaranteed fund by another defendant to the Settlement. If any final approval order by the court in the Federal action with respect to the Settlement is appealed and such appeal would delay potential payment to claimants under the Settlement, WVAWC and the other defendant to the Settlement will contribute up to $50 million and $25 million, respectively, to the Settlement (not including, in the case of WVAWC, any contributions by the Company’s general liability insurance carriers which would not be made until such time as a final, non-appealable order is issued) into an escrow account during the pendency of such appeals. For certain claims, WVAWC and the other defendant to the Settlement may, in lieu of these escrowed contributions, make advance payments of such claims if agreed to by the parties. All administrative expenses of the Settlement and attorneys’ fees of class counsel related thereto would be paid from the funds designated to pay claims covered by the Settlement.
As a result of these events, in the third quarter of 2016, the Company recorded a charge to earnings, net of insurance receivables, of $65 million ($39 million after-tax). Additionally, in the third quarter of 2017, the Company recorded a benefit of $22 million ($13 million after-tax) as an additional insurance receivable reflecting the settlement with the insurance carrier described above. The settlement amount of $126 million is reflected in Accrued Liabilities and the offsetting insurance receivables are reflected in Other Current Assets in the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2017. The Company intends to fund WVAWC’s contributions to the Settlement through existing sources of liquidity, although no contribution by WVAWC will be required unless and until the terms of the Settlement are finally approved by the court in the Federal action. Furthermore, under the terms of the Settlement, WVAWC has agreed that it will not seek rate recovery from the Public Service Commission of West Virginia (the “PSC”) for approximately $4 million in direct response costs expensed in 2014 by WVAWC relating to the Freedom Industries chemical spill as well as for amounts paid by WVAWC under the Settlement.
The Company’s insurance policies operate under a layered structure where coverage is generally provided in the upper layers after claims have exhausted lower layers of coverage. The $36 million to be contributed by a number of the Company’s general liability insurance carriers to the individual review claim fund, as noted above, is from higher layers of the insurance structure than the insurance carrier that was requested, but presently has not agreed, to participate in the Settlement. Any recovery by WVAWC or the Company from the remaining non-participating carrier would reimburse WVAWC for its contributions to the guaranteed fund.
Notice of the terms of the Settlement to members of the settlement class commenced on October 11, 2017. Following the notice period, on January 9, 2018, the court in the Federal action held a fairness hearing to consider final approval of the Settlement, which was continued on February 1, 2018 to address certain open matters. At this hearing, the court in the Federal action indicated that it intended to enter an order approving the Settlement, and the parties submitted a proposed order to the court on February 2, 2018.
Other Related Proceedings
Additionally, investigations with respect to the matter have been initiated by the U.S. Chemical Safety and Hazard Investigation Board (the “CSB”), the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of West Virginia, the West Virginia Attorney General, and the PSC. As a result of the U.S. Attorney’s Office investigation, Freedom Industries and six former Freedom Industries employees (three of whom also were former owners of Freedom Industries), pled guilty to violations of the federal Clean Water Act. Moreover, the PSC issued an order on June 15, 2017 concluding its investigation without requiring WVAWC to take any further action with respect to the matters covered by the general investigation.

The CSB is an independent investigatory agency with no regulatory mandate or ability to issue fines or citations; rather, the CSB can only issue recommendations for further action. In response to the Freedom Industries chemical spill, the CSB commenced an investigation shortly thereafter. In September 2016, the CSB issued and adopted its investigation report in which it recommended that the Company conduct additional source water protection activities. On April 4, 2017, the CSB indicated that the implementation by the Company of source water protection activities resolved the first two parts of the CSB’s recommendation. The CSB also noted that compliance by the Company with the third part of its recommendation is ongoing and that closure of this part is contingent upon completion of updated contingency planning for the Company’s water utilities outside of West Virginia. In light of public response to its original September 2016 investigation report, on May 11, 2017, the CSB issued a new version of this report. The primary substantive change addressed CSB’s factual evaluation of the duration and volume of contamination from the leaking tank, decreasing its estimate of the leak time but increasing the volume estimate by 10%. No substantive changes were made to the conclusions and recommendations in the original report. The Company has submitted an updated report on contingency planning and is awaiting CSB’s further review.
On March 16, 2017, the Lincoln County (West Virginia) Commission (the “LCC”) passed a county ordinance entitled the “Lincoln County, WV Comprehensive Public Nuisance Investigation and Abatement Ordinance.” The ordinance establishes a mechanism that Lincoln County believes will allow it to pursue criminal or civil proceedings for the “public nuisance” it alleges was caused by the Freedom Industries chemical spill. On April 20, 2017, the LCC filed a complaint in Lincoln County state court against WVAWC and certain other defendants not affiliated with the Company, alleging that the Freedom Industries chemical spill caused a public nuisance in Lincoln County. The complaint seeks an injunction against WVAWC that would require the creation of various databases and public repositories of documents related to the Freedom Industries chemical spill, as well as further study and risk assessments regarding the alleged exposure of Lincoln County residents to the released chemicals. On June 12, 2017, the Mass Litigation Panel entered an order granting a motion to transfer this case to its jurisdiction and stayed the case consistent with the existing stay order. The LCC has elected to opt out of the Settlement. On January 26, 2018, the LCC filed a motion seeking to lift the stay imposed by the Mass Litigation Panel. This motion is pending. WVAWC believes that this lawsuit is without merit and intends to vigorously contest the claims and allegations raised in the complaint.
California Public Utilities Commission Residential Rate Design Proceeding
In December 2016, the CPUC issued a final decision in a proceeding involving California-American Water Company, a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company (“Cal Am”), adopting a new residential rate design for Cal Am’s Monterey District. The decision allowed for recovery by Cal Am of $32 million in under-collections in the water revenue adjustment mechanism/modified cost balancing account (“WRAM/MCBA”) over a five-year period, plus interest, and modified existing conservation and rationing plans. In its decision, the CPUC noted concern regarding Cal Am’s residential tariff administration, specifically regarding the lack of verification of customer-provided information about the number of residents per household. This information was used for generating billing determinants under the tiered rate system. As a result, the CPUC kept this proceeding open to address several issues, including whether Cal Am’s residential tariff administration violated a statute, rule or CPUC decision, and if so, whether a penalty should be imposed.
On February 24, 2017, Cal Am, the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District, the CPUC’s Office of Ratepayer Advocates, and the Coalition of Peninsula Businesses filed for CPUC approval of a joint settlement agreement (the “Joint Settlement Agreement”), which among other things, proposed to resolve the CPUC’s residential tariff administration concerns by providing for a waiver by Cal Am of $0.5 million of cost recovery for residential customers through the WRAM/MCBA in lieu of a penalty. Approval of the Joint Settlement Agreement, which is required for it to take effect, remains pending before the CPUC.
On March 28, 2017, the administrative law judge assigned to the proceeding issued a ruling stating there was sufficient evidence to conclude, on a preliminary basis, that Cal Am’s administration of the residential tariff violated certain provisions of the California Public Utilities Code and a CPUC decision. The ruling ordered Cal Am to show cause why it should not be penalized for these administrative violations and directed the settling parties to address whether the cost recovery waiver in the Joint Settlement Agreement was reasonable compared to a potential penalty range described by the administrative law judge. During hearings held on April 13-14, 2017, the administrative law judge clarified that this potential penalty range is $3 million to $179 million (calculated as a continuing violation dating back to 2000 and applying penalties of up to $20,000 per day until January 1, 2012 and penalties of up to $50,000 per day thereafter, reflecting a 2012 change to the relevant statute). The administrative law judge also noted that a per diem penalty may not be appropriate, as Cal Am’s monthly billing practices did not allow Cal Am to update customer-provided information for billing purposes on a daily basis. Hearings before the administrative law judge in this matter were held in August, September and November 2017. Cal Am also submitted additional testimony on the issue of whether Cal Am should be penalized, and if so, the reasonable amount of any such penalty. This proceeding remains pending, and the CPUC has set a statutory deadline of September 30, 2018 for the completion of the proceeding.
As of December 31, 2017, the portions of this loss contingency that are probable and/or reasonably possible have been determined to be immaterial to the Company and have been included in the aggregate maximum amounts described above in the paragraph under “Contingencies” in this Note 15.

Dunbar, West Virginia Water Main Break Class Action Litigation
On the evening of June 23, 2015, a 36-inch pre-stressed concrete transmission water main, installed in the early 1970s, failed. The water main is part of WVAWC’sthe West Relay pumping station located in the City of Dunbar.Dunbar, West Virginia and owned by WVAWC. The failure of the main caused water outages and low pressure tofor up to approximately 25,000 WVAWC customers. In the early morning hours of June 25, 2015, crews completed a repair, but that same day, the repair developed a leak. On June 26, 2015, a second repair was completed and service was restored that day to approximately 80% of the impacted customers, and to the remaining approximately 20% by the next morning. The second repair showed signs of leaking, but the water main was usable until June 29, 2015, to allow tanks to refill. The system was reconfigured to maintain service to all but approximately 3,000 customers while a final repair was being completed safely on June 30, 2015. Water service was fully restored onby July 1, 2015, to all customers affected by this event.
On June 2, 2017, a class action complaint captioned Jeffries, et al. v. West Virginia-American Water Company was filed in West Virginia Circuit Court in Kanawha County against WVAWC on behalf of a purportedan alleged class of residents and business owners who lost water service or pressure as a result of the Dunbar main break. The complaint alleges breach of contract by WVAWC for failure to supply water, violation of West Virginia law regarding the sufficiency of WVAWC’s facilities and negligence by WVAWC in the design, maintenance and operation of the water system. The Jeffriesplaintiffs seek unspecified alleged damages on behalf of the class for lost profits, annoyance and inconvenience, and loss of use, as well as punitive damages for willful, reckless and wanton behavior in not addressing the risk of pipe failure and a large outage.
On October 12, 2017, WVAWC
123

Table of Contents
In February 2020, the Jeffries plaintiffs filed with the court a motion seeking class certification on the issues of breach of contract and negligence, and to dismiss alldetermine the applicability of punitive damages and a multiplier for those damages if imposed. In July 2020, the Circuit Court entered an order granting the Jeffriesplaintiffs’ counts alleging statutorymotion for certification of a class regarding certain liability issues but denying certification of a class to determine a punitive damages multiplier. In August 2020, WVAWC filed a Petition for Writ of Prohibition in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia seeking to vacate or remand the Circuit Court’s order certifying the issues class. In January 2021, the Supreme Court of Appeals remanded the case back to the Circuit Court for further consideration in light of a decision issued in another case relating to the class certification issues raised on appeal. On July 5, 2022, the Circuit Court entered an order again certifying a class to address at trial certain liability issues but not to consider damages. On August 26, 2022, WVAWC filed another Petition for Writ of Prohibition in the Supreme Court of Appeals of West Virginia challenging the West Virginia Circuit Court’s July 5, 2022 order. The Writ Petition has been supported by an amicus brief filed by certain water and common law tort claims. Furthermore, WVAWC asserts thatutility industry trade groups. On February 9, 2023, the PSC,Supreme Court of Appeals accepted the Writ Petition by issuing a Rule to Show Cause and not the court, has primary jurisdiction over allegations involving violations of the applicable tariff, the public utility code and related rules. This motion remains pending.scheduling oral argument for April 26, 2023.
The Company and WVAWC believe that WVAWC has valid, meritorious defenses to the claims raised in this class action complaint. WVAWC is vigorously defending itself against these allegations. Given the current stage of this proceeding, theThe Company cannot reasonablycurrently determine the likelihood of a loss, if any, or estimate the amount of any reasonably possible lossesloss or a range of such losses related to this proceeding.
Chattanooga, Tennessee Water Main Break Class Action Litigation
On September 12, 2019, the Company’s Tennessee subsidiary (“TAWC”), experienced a leak in a 36-inch water transmission main, which caused service fluctuations or interruptions to TAWC customers and the issuance of a boil water notice. TAWC repaired the main by early morning on September 14, 2019, and restored full water service by the afternoon of September 15, 2019, with the boil water notice lifted for all customers on September 16, 2019.
On September 17, 2019, a complaint captioned Bruce, et al. v. American Water Works Company, Inc., et al. was filed in the Circuit Court of Hamilton County, Tennessee against TAWC, the Company and American Water Works Service Company, Inc. (“Service Company” and, together with TAWC and the Company, collectively, the “Tennessee-American Water Defendants”), on behalf of a proposed class of individuals or entities who lost water service or suffered monetary losses as a result of the Chattanooga incident (the “Tennessee Plaintiffs”). The complaint alleged breach of contract and negligence against the Tennessee-American Water Defendants, as well as an equitable remedy of piercing the corporate veil. In the complaint as originally filed, the Tennessee Plaintiffs were seeking an award of unspecified alleged damages for wage losses, business and economic losses, out-of-pocket expenses, loss of use and enjoyment of property and annoyance and inconvenience, as well as punitive damages, attorneys’ fees and pre- and post-judgment interest. In September 2020, the court dismissed all of the Tennessee Plaintiffs’ claims in their complaint, except for the breach of contract claims against TAWC, which remain pending. In October 2020, TAWC answered the complaint, and the parties have been engaging in discovery. On January 12, 2023, after hearing oral argument, the court issued an oral ruling denying the Tennessee Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification. On February 9, 2023, the Tennessee Plaintiffs sought reconsideration of the ruling by the court, and any final ruling is appealable to the Tennessee Court of Appeals, as allowed under Tennessee law.
TAWC and the Company believe that TAWC has meritorious defenses to the claims raised in this class action complaint, and TAWC is vigorously defending itself against these allegations. The Company cannot currently determine the likelihood of a loss, if any, or estimate the amount of any loss or a range of such losses related to this proceeding.
Alternative Water Supply in Lieu of Carmel River Diversions
Compliance with Orders to Reduce Carmel River Diversions—Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project
Under a 2009 order (the “2009 Order”) of the State Water Resources Control Board (the “SWRCB”), the Company’s California subsidiary (“Cal Am”) is required to decrease significantly its yearly diversions of water from the Carmel River according to a set reduction schedule. In 2016, the SWRCB issued an order (the “2016 Order,” and, together with the 2009 Order, the “Orders”) approving a deadline of December 31, 2021, for Cal Am’s compliance with these prior orders.
Cal Am is currently involved in developing the Monterey Peninsula Water Supply Project (the “Water Supply Project”), which includes the construction of a desalination plant, to be owned by Cal Am, and the construction of wells that would supply water to the desalination plant. In addition, the Water Supply Project also includes Cal Am’s purchase of water from a groundwater replenishment project (the “GWR Project”) between Monterey One Water and the Monterey Peninsula Water Management District (the “MPWMD”). The Water Supply Project is intended, among other things, to fulfill Cal Am’s obligations under the Orders.
124

Table of Contents
Cal Am’s ability to move forward on the Water Supply Project is subject to administrative review by the CPUC and other government agencies, obtaining necessary permits, and intervention from other parties. In September 2016, the CPUC unanimously approved a final decision to authorize Cal Am to enter into a water purchase agreement for the GWR Project and to construct a pipeline and pump station facilities and recover up to $50 million in associated incurred costs plus AFUDC, subject to meeting certain criteria.
In September 2018, the CPUC unanimously approved another final decision finding that the Water Supply Project meets the CPUC’s requirements for a certificate of public convenience and necessity and an additional procedural phase was not necessary to consider alternative projects. The CPUC’s 2018 decision concludes that the Water Supply Project is the best project to address estimated future water demands in Monterey, and, in addition to the cost recovery approved in its 2016 decision, adopts Cal Am’s cost estimates for the Water Supply Project, which amounted to an aggregate of $279 million plus AFUDC at a rate representative of Cal Am’s actual financing costs. The 2018 final decision specifies the procedures for recovery of all of Cal Am’s prudently incurred costs associated with the Water Supply Project upon its completion, subject to the frameworks included in the final decision related to cost caps, operation and maintenance costs, financing, ratemaking and contingency matters. The reasonableness of the Water Supply Project costs will be reviewed by the CPUC when Cal Am seeks cost recovery for the Water Supply Project. Cal Am is also required to implement mitigation measures to avoid, minimize or offset significant environmental impacts from the construction and operation of the Water Supply Project and comply with a mitigation monitoring and reporting program, a reimbursement agreement for CPUC costs associated with that program, and reporting requirements on plant operations following placement of the Water Supply Project in service. Cal Am has incurred $206 million in aggregate costs as of December 31, 2022, related to the Water Supply Project, which includes $51 million in AFUDC.
In September 2021, Cal Am, Monterey One Water and the MPWMD reached an agreement on Cal Am’s purchase of additional water from an expansion to the GWR Project, which is not expected to produce additional water until 2024 at the earliest.The amended and restated water purchase agreement for the GWR Project expansion is subject to review and approval of the CPUC, and in November 2021, Cal Am filed an application with the CPUC that sought review and approval of the amended and restated water purchase agreement. Cal Am also requested rate base treatment of the additional capital investment for certain Cal Am facilities required to maximize the water supply from the expansion to the GWR Project and a related Aquifer Storage and Recovery Project, totaling approximately $81 million. This requested amount is in addition to, and consistent in regulatory treatment with, the prior $50 million of cost recovery for facilities associated with the original water purchase agreement, which was approved by the CPUC in its 2016 final decision.
On December 5, 2022, the CPUC issued a final decision that authorizes Cal Am to enter into the amended water purchase agreement, and specifically to increase pumping capacity and reliability of groundwater extraction from the Seaside Groundwater Basin. The final decision sets the cost cap for the proposed facilities at approximately $62 million. Cal Am may seek recovery of amounts above the cost cap in a subsequent rate filing or general rate case. Additionally, the final decision authorizes AFUDC at Cal Am’s actual weighted average cost of debt for most of the facilities.
On December 30, 2022, Cal Am filed with the CPUC an application for rehearing of the CPUC’s December 5, 2022 final decision. Cal Am is requesting recovery of its infrastructure costs for the GWR Project expansion that had not been included in the December 2022 final decision. Cal Am believes that the December 2022 final decision is contrary to the CPUC’s precedent and that obtaining recovery of these infrastructure costs is a key component of the GWR Project expansion and Cal Am’s ability to meet the future water supply needs of its customers in Monterey. This application remains pending.
While Cal Am believes that its expenditures to date have been prudent and necessary to comply with the Orders, as well as the CPUC’s 2016 and 2018 final decisions, Cal Am cannot currently predict its ability to recover all of its costs and expenses associated with the Water Supply Project and there can be no assurance that Cal Am will be able to recover all of such costs and expenses in excess of the $112 million in aggregate construction costs, plus applicable AFUDC, previously approved by the CPUC in its 2016 and December 2022 final decisions.
125

Table of Contents
Coastal Development Permit Application
In 2018, Cal Am submitted a coastal development permit application (the “Marina Application”) to the City of Marina (the “City”) for those project components of the Water Supply Project located within the City’s coastal zone. Members of the City’s Planning Commission, as well as City councilpersons, have publicly expressed opposition to the Water Supply Project. In May 2019, the City issued a notice of final local action based upon the denial by the Planning Commission of the Marina Application. Thereafter, Cal Am appealed this decision to the Coastal Commission, as permitted under the City’s code and the California Coastal Act. At the same time, Cal Am submitted an application (the “Original Jurisdiction Application”) to the Coastal Commission for a coastal development permit for those project components located within the Coastal Commission’s original jurisdiction. After Coastal Commission staff issued reports recommending denial of the Original Jurisdiction Application, noting potential impacts on environmentally sensitive habitat areas and wetlands and possible disproportionate impacts to communities of concern, in September 2020, Cal Am withdrew the Original Jurisdiction Application in order to address the staff’s environmental justice concerns. The withdrawal of the Original Jurisdiction Application did not impact Cal Am’s appeal of the City’s denial of the Marina Application, which remains pending before the Coastal Commission. In November 2020, Cal Am refiled the Original Jurisdiction Application.
On October 5, 2022, Cal Am announced a phasing plan for the proposed desalination plant component of the Water Supply Project. The desalination plant and slant wells originally approved by the CPUC would produce up to 6.4 million gallons of desalinated water per day. Under the phased approach, the facilities would initially be constructed to produce up to 4.8 million gallons per day of desalinated water, enough to meet anticipated demand through about 2030, and would limit the number of slant wells initially constructed. As demand increases in the future, desalination facilities would be expanded to meet the additional demand. The phased approach seeks to meet near-term demand by allowing for additional supply as it becomes needed, while also providing an opportunity for regional future public participation and was developed by Cal Am based on feedback received from the community.
On November 18, 2022, the Coastal Commission approved the Marina Application and the Original Jurisdiction Application with respect to the phased development of the proposed desalination plant, subject to compliance with a number of conditions, all of which Cal Am expects to satisfy. On December 29, 2022, the City, Marina Coast Water District (“MCWD”), MCWD’s groundwater sustainability agency, and the MPWMD jointly filed a petition for writ of mandate in Monterey County Superior Court against the Coastal Commission, alleging that the Coastal Commission violated the California Coastal Act and the California Environmental Quality Act in issuing a coastal development permit to Cal Am for construction of the MPWSP slant wells. Cal Am is named as a real party in interest. This matter remains pending.
Following the issuance of the coastal development permit, Cal Am continues to work constructively with all appropriate agencies to provide necessary information in connection with obtaining the remaining required permits for the Water Supply Project. However, there can be no assurance that the Water Supply Project in its current configuration will be completed on a timely basis, if ever. For the year ended December 31, 2022, Cal Am has complied with the diversion limitations contained in the 2016 Order. Continued compliance with the diversion limitations in 2023 and future years may be impacted by a number of factors, including without limitation continued drought conditions in California and the exhaustion of water supply reserves, and will require successful development of alternate water supply sources sufficient to meet customer demand. The Orders remain in effect until Cal Am certifies to the SWRCB, and the SWRCB concurs, that Cal Am has obtained a permanent supply of water to substitute for past unauthorized Carmel River diversions. While the Company cannot currently predict the likelihood or result of any adverse outcome associated with these matters, further attempts to comply with the Orders may result in material additional costs and obligations to Cal Am, including fines and penalties against Cal Am in the event of noncompliance with the Orders.
West Virginia Elk River Freedom Industries Chemical Spill
On June 8, 2018, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia granted final approval of a settlement class and global class action settlement (the “Settlement”) for all claims and potential claims by all class members (collectively, the “West Virginia Plaintiffs”) arising out of the January 2014 Freedom Industries, Inc. chemical spill in West Virginia. The effective date of the Settlement was July 16, 2018. Under the terms and conditions of the Settlement, WVAWC and certain other Company affiliated entities did not admit, and will not admit, any fault or liability for any of the allegations made by the West Virginia Plaintiffs in any of the actions that were resolved.
As of December 31, 2022, $0.5 million of the aggregate Settlement amount of $126 million remains reflected in accrued liabilities, and $0.5 million in an offsetting insurance receivable remains reflected in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets pending resolution of all asserted actual or potential claims associated with this matter. The amount reflected in accrued liabilities reflects the status of the liability and the offsetting insurance receivable reflected in other current assets, each as of as of December 31, 2022.
126

Table of Contents
Note 16:17: Earnings per Common Share
The followingPresented in the table below is a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator for the basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) calculations for the years ended December 31:
 202220212020
Numerator:   
Net income attributable to common shareholders$820 $1,263 $709 
Denominator:   
Weighted average common shares outstanding—Basic182 182 181 
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents— — 
Weighted average common shares outstanding—Diluted182 182 182 
 2017 2016 2015
Numerator:     
Net income attributable to common stockholders$426
 $468
 $476
      
Denominator: 
  
  
Weighted average common shares outstanding—Basic178
 178
 179
Effect of dilutive common stock equivalents1
 1
 1
Weighted average common shares outstanding—Diluted179
 179
 180
The effect of dilutive common stock equivalents is related to outstanding stock options, RSUs and performance stock unitsPSUs granted under the Company’s 2007 Plan and outstanding RSUs and PSUs granted under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plans,Plan, as well as estimated shares to be purchased under the ESPP. Less than one million share-based awards were excluded from the computation of diluted EPS for the years ended December 31, 2017, 20162022, 2021 and 20152020, because their effect would have been anti-dilutive under the treasury stock method.
Note 17:18: Fair ValuesValue of Financial InstrumentsInformation
The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating its fair value disclosures for financial instruments:
Current assets and current liabilities—The carrying amounts reported inon the Consolidated Balance Sheets for current assets and current liabilities, including revolving credit debt, due to the short-term maturities and variable interest rates, approximate their fair values.

Seller promissory note from the sale of HOS — The carrying amount reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheets for the seller promissory note from the sale of HOS is $720 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021. This amount represents the principal amount owed under the seller note, for which the Company expects to receive full payment. The accounting fair value measurement of the seller note approximated $686 million and $720 million as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The accounting fair value measurement is an estimate that is reflective of changes in benchmark interest rates. The seller note is classified as Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy.
Preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements and long-term debt—The fair values of preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements and long-term debt are categorized within the fair value hierarchy based on the inputs that are used to value each instrument. The fair value of long-term debt classified as Level 1 is calculated using quoted prices in active markets. Level 2 instruments are valued using observable inputs and Level 3 instruments are valued using observable and unobservable inputs. The fair values of instruments classified as Level 2 and 3
Presented in the tables below are determined by a valuation model that is based on a conventional discounted cash flow methodology and utilizes assumptions of current market rates. As a majority of the Company’s debts do not trade in active markets, the Company calculated a base yield curve using a risk-free rate (a U.S. Treasury securities yield curve) plus a credit spread that is based on the following two factors: an average of the Company’s own publicly-traded debt securities and the current market rates for U.S. Utility A debt securities. The Company used these yield curve assumptions to derive a base yield for the Level 2 and Level 3 securities. Additionally, the Company adjusted the base yield for specific features of the debt securities including call features, coupon tax treatment and collateral for the Level 3 instruments.
The carrying amounts, including fair value adjustments previously recognized in acquisition purchase accounting, and a fair value adjustment related to the Company’s interest rate swap fair value hedge (which is classified as Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy), and fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:instruments:
As of December 31, 2022
 Carrying AmountAt Fair Value
 
Level 1
Level 2Level 3Total
Preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements$$— $— $$
Long-term debt (excluding finance lease obligations)11,207 8,599 49 1,427 10,075 
127

Table of Contents
 Carrying Amount December 31, 2017
  
Level 1
 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements$10
 $
 $
 $14
 $14
Long-term debt (excluding capital lease obligations)6,809
 4,846
 976
 1,821
 7,643
As of December 31, 2021
Carrying Amount December 31, 2016 Carrying AmountAt Fair Value
 
Level 1
 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Level 1
Level 2Level 3Total
Preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements$12
 $
 $
 $15
 $15
Preferred stock with mandatory redemption requirements$$— $— $$
Long-term debt (excluding capital lease obligations)6,320
 3,876
 1,363
 1,805
 7,044
Long-term debt (excluding finance lease obligations)Long-term debt (excluding finance lease obligations)10,396 10,121 60 1,637 11,818 
Fair Value Measurements
To increase consistency and comparability in fair value measurements, GAAP establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three levels as follows:
Level 1—quotedQuoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access as of the reporting date. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 1 inputs include active exchange-traded equity securities, exchange-based derivatives, mutual funds and money market funds.
Level 2—inputsInputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are directly observable for the asset or liability or indirectly observable through corroboration with observable market data. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 2 inputs include fixed income securities, non-exchange-based derivatives, commingled investment funds not subject to purchase and sale restrictions and fair-value hedges.
Level 3—unobservableUnobservable inputs, such as internally-developed pricing models for the asset or liability due to little or no market activity for the asset or liability. Financial assets and liabilities utilizing Level 3 inputs include infrequently-traded non-exchange-based derivatives and commingled investment funds subject to purchase and sale restrictions.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements
The following table presentsPresented in the tables below are assets and liabilities measured and recorded at fair value on a recurring basis and their level within the fair value hierarchy ashierarchy:
As of December 31, 2022
 Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:    
Restricted funds$32 $— $— $32 
Rabbi trust investments21 — — 21 
Deposits— — 
Other investments
Money market and other61 — — 61 
Fixed-Income Securities147 — 153 
Contingent cash payment from the sale of HOS— — 72 72 
Mark-to-market derivative asset— — 
Total assets268 72 347 
Liabilities:    
Deferred compensation obligations24 — — 24 
Total liabilities24 — — 24 
Total net assets$244 $$72 $323 
128

Table of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively:
 December 31, 2017
 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total
Assets:       
Restricted funds$28
 $
 $
 $28
Rabbi trust investments15
 
 
 15
Deposits4
 
 
 4
Other investments3
 
 
 3
Total assets50
 
 
 50
Liabilities:       
Deferred compensation obligation17
 
 
 17
Mark-to-market derivative liability
 3
 
 3
Total liabilities17
 3
 
 20
Total net assets (liabilities)$33
 $(3) $
 $30
December 31, 2016As of December 31, 2021
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Total Level 1Level 2Level 3Total
Assets:       Assets:    
Restricted funds$24
 $
 $
 $24
Restricted funds$21 $— $— $21 
Rabbi trust investments12
 
 
 12
Rabbi trust investments23 — — 23 
Deposits3
 
 
 3
Deposits27 — — 27 
Mark-to-market derivative asset
 28
 
 28
Other investments1
 
 
 1
Other investments17 — — 17 
Contingent cash payment from the sale of HOSContingent cash payment from the sale of HOS— — 72 72 
Total assets40
 28
 
 68
Total assets88 — 72 160 
Liabilities:       Liabilities:    
Deferred compensation obligation13
 
 
 13
Mark-to-market derivative liability
 
 
 
Deferred compensation obligationsDeferred compensation obligations27 — — 27 
Total liabilities13
 
 
 13
Total liabilities27 — — 27 
Total net assets (liabilities)$27
 $28
 $
 $55
Total net assetsTotal net assets$61 $— $72 $133 
Restricted funds—The Company’s restricted funds primarily represent proceeds received from financings for the construction and capital improvement of facilities and from customers for future services under operationsoperation, maintenance and maintenancerepair projects. Long-term restricted funds of $1 million and $4 million were included in other long-term assets as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Rabbi trust investments—The Company’s Rabbirabbi trust investments consist of equity and index funds from which supplemental executive retirement plan benefits and deferred compensation obligations can be paid. The Company includes these assets in other long-term assets.assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deposits—Deposits include escrow funds and certain other deposits held in trust. The Company includes cash deposits in other current assets.assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.
Deferred compensation obligations—The Company’s deferred compensation plans allow participants to defer certain cash compensation into notional investment accounts. The Company includes such plans in other long-term liabilities.liabilities on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The value of the Company’s deferred compensation obligations is based on the market value of the participants’ notional investment accounts. The notional investments are comprised primarily of mutual funds, which are based on observable market prices.

Mark-to-market derivative assetassets and liability—liabilities—The Company utilizes fixed-to-floating interest-rate swaps, typically designated as fair-value hedges, to achieve a targeted level of variable-rate debt as a percentage of total debt. The Company also employs derivative financial instruments in the form of variable-to-fixed interest rate swaps and forward starting interest rate swaps,treasury lock agreements, classified as economic hedges and cash flow hedges, respectively, in order to fix the interest cost on existing or forecasted debt. The Company uses a calculation of future cash inflows and estimated future outflows, which are discounted, to determine the current fair value. Additional inputs to the present value calculation include the contract terms, counterparty credit risk, interest rates and market volatility.
Other investments—Other As a result of the Retiree Welfare Plan changes discussed in Note 15—Employee Benefits, effective December 31, 2022, the Company transferred investment assets from the Bargained VEBA into the existing trust maintained for the benefit of the Active VEBA. The transfer of these Bargained VEBA investment assets into the Active VEBA permits access to approximately $194 million of assets for purposes of paying active union employee medical benefits.
The investments in the Active VEBA primarily representconsist of money market funds used for active employee benefits.and available-for-sale fixed income securities. The money market and other investments have original maturities of three months or less when purchased. The fair value measurement of the money market and other investments is based on observable market prices and therefore included in the recurring fair value measurements hierarchy as Level 1. The available-for-sale fixed income securities are primarily investments in U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds. The majority of U.S. Treasury securities and government bonds have been categorized as Level 1 because they trade in highly-liquid and transparent markets. Certain U.S. Treasury securities are based on prices that reflect observable market information, such as actual trade information of similar securities, and are therefore categorized as Level 2, because the valuations are calculated using models which utilize actively traded market data that the Company can corroborate. The Company includes other investments of $67 million and $147 million in Other current assets and Other long-term assets, respectively, on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2022. Other investments as of December 31, 2021, are included in other current assets.assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet.
129

Table of Contents
The fair value of the Company’s available-for-sale fixed income securities, summarized by contractual maturities, as of December 31, 2022, is as follows:
Amount
Other investments - Available-for-sale fixed-income securities
Less than one year$61 
1 year - 5 years79 
5 years - 10 years
Greater than 10 years10 
Total$153 
Contingent cash payment from the sale of HOS—The Company’s contingent cash payment derivative included as part of the consideration from the sale of HOS is included in other current assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the contingent cash payment is $72 million, which is reflective of changes in the benchmark interest rate and estimated using the probability of the outcome of receipt of the $75 million, a Level 3 input.
Note 18:19: Leases
The Company has entered into operating and finance leases involving certainreal property, including facilities, utility assets, vehicles, and equipment. Rental expenses under operating leases were $29 million, $24 million and $21 million for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The operating leases for facilities will expire over the next 25 years and the operating leases for equipment will expire over the next 5 years. Certain operating leases have renewal options ranging from one to five60 years.
The minimum annual future rental commitment underexercise of lease renewal options is at the Company’s sole discretion. Renewal options that the Company was reasonably certain to exercise are included in the Company’s ROU assets. Certain operating leases that have initial or remaining non-cancelable lease termscontain the option to purchase the leased property. The operating leases for real property, vehicles and equipment will expire over the next 537 years, six years, and thereafter are as follows:four years, respectively.
 Amount
2018$15
201914
202012
20219
20228
Thereafter65
The Company hasparticipates in a seriesnumber of agreementsarrangements with various public entities (the “Partners”(“Partners”) to establish certain joint ventures, commonly referred to as “public-private partnerships.”in West Virginia. Under the public-private partnerships,these arrangements, the Company constructedtransferred a portion of its utility plant financed by the Company and the Partners constructed utility plant (connected to the Company’s property), financed by the Partners. The Company agreed to transfer and convey some of its real and personal property to the Partners in exchange for an equal principal amount of Industrial Development Bonds (“IDBs”), issued by the Partners under a statethe Industrial Development Bond and Commercial Development Bond Act. The Company leased back the total facilities, including portions funded by both the Company and the Partners,utility plant under leasesagreements for a period of 30 to 40 years.
The Company has recorded these agreements as finance leases related to the portion of the facilities funded by the Company have required payments from the Company to the Partners that approximate the payments required by the terms of the IDBs from the Partners to the Company (as the holder of the IDBs). As thein property, plant and equipment, as ownership of the portion of the facilities constructed by the Companyassets will revert back to the Company at the end of the lease the Company has recorded these as capital leases. The lease obligation and the receivable for the principal amount of the IDBs are presented by the Company on a net basis.term. The carrying value of the facilities funded by the Company recognized as a capitalfinance lease assetassets was $150$145 million and $152$146 million as of December 31, 20172022 and 2016, respectively, which is presented2021, respectively. The Company determined that the finance lease obligations and the investments in property, plantIDBs meet the conditions for offsetting, and equipment inas such, are reported net on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. Sheets and excluded from the finance lease disclosure presented below.
The future paymentsCompany also enters into O&M agreements with the Partners. The Company pays an annual fee for use of the Partners’ assets in performing under the O&M agreements. The O&M agreements are recorded as operating leases, and future annual use fees of $4 million in 2023 through 2027, and $45 million thereafter, are included in operating lease obligations are equal toROU assets and offset byoperating lease liabilities on the payments receivableConsolidated Balance Sheets.
Rental expenses under operating and finance leases were $12 million, $13 million and $14 million for the IDBs.years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.
For the year ended December 31, 2022, cash paid for amounts in lease liabilities, which includes operating and financing cash flows from operating and finance leases, was $12 million. For the year ended December 31, 2022, ROU assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease liabilities was $5 million.
As of December 31, 2017,2022, the minimum annual future rental commitment underweighted-average remaining lease term of the finance lease and operating leases forwere three years and 18 years, respectively, and the portionweighted-average discount rate of the facilities funded by the Partners that have initial or remaining non-cancelablefinance lease terms in excessand operating leases were 12% and 4%, respectively.
The future maturities of one year included in the preceding minimum annual rental commitmentslease liabilities at December 31, 2022, are $4$9 million in 2018 through2023, $10 million in 2024, $8 million in 2025, $7 million in 2026, $6 million in 2027 and $76 million thereafter. At December 31, 2022, and $63 million thereafter.imputed interest was $39 million.
130

Table of Contents
Note 19:20: Segment Information
The Company’s operating segments are comprised of the revenue-generating components of its businesses for which generate revenue, incur expense and have separate financial information which is internally produced and regularly used by management to make operating decisions, assess performance and assess performance.allocate resources. The Company operates its businesses primarily through one reportable segment, the Regulated Businesses segment. The Company also operates businesses that provide a broad range of related and complementary water and wastewater services in non-regulated markets, which includes four operating segments that individually do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment. These four non-reportable operating segments are collectively presented as our “Market-Based Businesses.”

The Regulated Businesses segment is the largest component of the Company’s business and includes 20 subsidiaries that provide water and wastewater services to customers in 1614 states.
The Market-Based Businesses’ four non-reportable operating segments are Military Services Group, Contract Operations Group, Homeowner Services GroupCompany also operates other market-based businesses, primarily MSG, which provide water and Keystone Operations. Military Services Group performs 50-year contracts withwastewater services to the U.S. government for the operation and maintenance of the water and wastewater systems on certain military bases. Homeowner Services Group provides services to domestic homeowners and smaller commercial establishments to protect against the cost of repairing damaged or blocked pipes inside and outside their accommodations,installations, as well as interior electric lines. Contract Operations Group performs contractsmunicipalities. These market-based businesses do not meet the criteria of a reportable segment in accordance with municipalities,GAAP, and are collectively presented throughout this Annual Report on Form 10-K within “Other,” which is consistent with how management assesses the foodresults of these businesses. The Company’s former HOS business, which was sold in the fourth quarter of 2021, was included in “Market-Based Businesses” in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2021. As a result of the sale of HOS, the categories which were previously shown as “Market-Based Businesses” and beverage industry“Other” have been combined and other customersare shown as Other. Segment results for the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020, have been adjusted retrospectively to operate and maintain water and wastewater facilities. Keystone Operations provides customized water sourcing, transfer services, pipeline construction and water storage solutions, for natural gas exploration and production companies.reflect this change.
The accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in the summary of significant accounting policies. See Note 2—Significant Accounting Policies. The Regulated Businesses segment and Market-Based Businesses includeincludes intercompany costs that are allocated by American Water Works Service Company Inc. and intercompany interest that is charged by American Water Capital Corp.,AWCC, both of which are eliminated to reconcile to the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Inter-segment revenues include the sale of water from a regulated subsidiary to market-based subsidiaries, leased office space, and furniture and equipment provided by the Company’s market-based subsidiaries to its regulated subsidiaries. “Other”Other also includes corporate costs that are not allocated to the Company’s operating segments,Regulated Businesses, interest income related to the seller promissory note and income from the revenue share agreement from the sale of HOS, eliminations of inter-segment transactions and fair value adjustments and associated income and deductions related to the acquisitions that have not been allocated to the operating segments for evaluation of performance and allocation of resource purposes.Regulated Businesses segment. The adjustments related to the acquisitions are reported in Other as they are excluded from segment performance measures evaluated by management.
The followingPresented in the tables include the Company’sbelow is summarized segment information as of and for the years ended December 31:
 2022
 Regulated
Businesses
OtherConsolidated
Operating revenues$3,505 $287 $3,792 
Depreciation and amortization633 16 649 
Total operating expenses, net2,242 277 2,519 
Interest expense(314)(119)(433)
Interest income50 52 
Gain or (loss) on sale of businesses— 19 19 
Income before income taxes1,042 (34)1,008 
Provision for income taxes188 — 188 
Net income attributable to common shareholders854 (34)820 
Total assets25,038 2,749 27,787 
Cash paid for capital expenditures2,284 13 2,297 
131

Table of Contents
2017 2021
Regulated
Businesses
 Market-Based
Businesses
 Other Consolidated Regulated
Businesses
OtherConsolidated
Operating revenues$2,958
 $422
 $(23) $3,357
Operating revenues$3,384 $546 $3,930 
Depreciation and amortization462
 18
 12
 492
Depreciation and amortization601 35 636 
Total operating expenses, net1,781
 360
 (28) 2,113
Total operating expenses, net2,227 507 2,734 
Interest, net(268) 3
 (77) (342)
Interest expenseInterest expense(290)(113)(403)
Interest incomeInterest income
Gain or (loss) on sale of businessesGain or (loss) on sale of businesses(1)748 747 
Income before income taxes925
 66
 (79) 912
Income before income taxes962 678 1,640 
Provision for income taxes366
 28
 92
 486
Provision for income taxes172 205 377 
Net income attributable to common stockholders559
 38
 (171) 426
Net income attributable to common shareholdersNet income attributable to common shareholders789 474 1,263 
Total assets17,602
 599
 1,281
 19,482
Total assets23,365 2,710 26,075 
Capital expenditures1,316
 18
 100
 1,434
Cash paid for capital expendituresCash paid for capital expenditures1,747 17 1,764 
 2020
 Regulated
Businesses
OtherConsolidated
Operating revenues$3,255 $522 $3,777 
Depreciation and amortization562 42 604 
Total operating expenses, net2,102 427 2,529 
Interest expense(293)(104)(397)
Interest income— 
Income before income taxes932 (8)924 
Provision for income taxes217 (2)215 
Net income attributable to common shareholders715 (6)709 
Total assets22,357 2,409 24,766 
Cash paid for capital expenditures1,804 18 1,822 
 2016
 Regulated
Businesses
 Market-Based
Businesses
 Other Consolidated
Operating revenues$2,871
 $451
 $(20) $3,302
Depreciation and amortization440
 15
 15
 470
Total operating expenses, net1,852
 391
 (21) 2,222
Interest, net(256) 2
 (71) (325)
Income before income taxes775
 65
 (70) 770
Provision for income taxes303
 26
 (27) 302
Net income attributable to common stockholders472
 39
 (43) 468
Total assets16,405
 637
 1,440
 18,482
Capital expenditures1,274
 18
 19
 1,311

 2015
 Regulated
Businesses
 Market-Based
Businesses
 Other Consolidated
Operating revenues$2,743
 $434
 $(18) $3,159
Depreciation and amortization411
 8
 21
 440
Total operating expenses, net1,732
 370
 (18) 2,084
Interest, net(248) 2
 (62) (308)
Income before income taxes776
 68
 (62) 782
Provision for income taxes303
 26
 (23) 306
Net income attributable to common stockholders473
 42
 (39) 476
Total assets15,258
 496
 1,487
 17,241
Capital expenditures1,143
 17
 
 1,160
Note 20:21: Unaudited Quarterly Data
The following table summarizes certainPresented in the tables below are supplemental, unaudited, consolidated, quarterly financial data for each of the four quarters in the years ended December 31, 20172022 and 2016,2021, respectively. The operating results for any quarter are not indicative of results that may be expected for a full year or any future periods.
2022
First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth Quarter
Operating revenues$842 $937 $1,082 $931 
Operating income246 327 439 261 
Net income attributable to common shareholders158 218 297 147 
Basic earnings per share: (a)
    
Net income attributable to common shareholders$0.87 $1.20 $1.63 $0.81 
Diluted earnings per share:    
Net income attributable to common shareholders0.87 1.20 1.63 0.81 
(a)Amounts may not sum due to rounding.
132

Table of Contents
 2017
 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
Operating revenues$756
 $844
 $936
 $821
Operating income227
 308
 430
 279
Net income attributable to common stockholders93
 131
 203
 (1)
Basic earnings per share:       
Net income attributable to common stockholders$0.52
 $0.74
 $1.14
 $(0.01)
Diluted earnings per share:       
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.52
 0.73
 1.13
 
2021
 First QuarterSecond QuarterThird QuarterFourth Quarter
Operating revenues$888 $999 $1,092 $951 
Operating income229 330 417 220 
Net income attributable to common shareholders133 207 278 645 
Basic earnings per share: (a)    
Net income attributable to common shareholders$0.73 $1.14 $1.53 $3.55 
Diluted earnings per share:    
Net income attributable to common shareholders0.73 1.14 1.53 3.55 
(a)Amounts may not sum due to rounding.
133
 2016
 First Quarter Second Quarter Third Quarter Fourth Quarter
Operating revenues$743
 $827
 $930
 $802
Operating income214
 299
 319
 248
Net income attributable to common stockholders82
 137
 148
 101
Basic earnings per share:       
Net income attributable to common stockholders$0.46
 $0.77
 $0.83
 $0.57
Diluted earnings per share:       
Net income attributable to common stockholders0.46
 0.77
 0.83
 0.57


Table of Contents

ITEM 9.
ITEM 9.    CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
None
None.
ITEM 9A.CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
ITEM 9A.    CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Disclosure Controls and Procedures
The Company, under the supervision and with the participation of its management, including theits Chief Executive Officer and theits Chief Financial Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Based on that evaluation, ourthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of December 31, 2017, our2022, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at a reasonable level of assurance. OurThe Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are designed to provide reasonable assuranceensure that the information required to be disclosed by usthe Company in the reports we fileit files or submitsubmits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objective.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
OurThe Company’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act. OurThe Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of ourthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. OurGAAP. The Company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that in reasonable detail accurately and fairly reflect ourits transactions and dispositions of our assets;its assets, (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of the financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles,GAAP, and that ourthe Company’s receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of ourits management and our directors;its directors, and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of ourits assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
OurThe Company’s management, including ourthe Company’s Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness of ourits internal control over financial reporting, as of December 31, 2017,2022, using the criteria described in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).
Based on ourthe Company’s evaluation under the framework in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013), ourits management concluded that ourits internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2017.2022.
The effectiveness of ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 20172022 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing in Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There wereThe Company concluded that there have been no changes to ourin internal control over financial reporting that occurred during ourits last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, ourthe Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
134

Table of Contents
ITEM 9B.
ITEM 9B.    OTHER INFORMATION
Changes to Long-Term Equity Award Retirement Provisions
On February 14, 2018, our15, 2023, Karl F. Kurz, the Company’s Board Chair, was notified by George MacKenzie that Mr. MacKenzie does not wish to be considered as a candidate for re-election at the Company’s 2023 Annual Meeting of Directors and Executive Development and Compensation Committee approved changesShareholders. Mr. MacKenzie’s notification was not due to any known disagreement on any matter relating to the retirement provisions of equity awards granted under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Equity Compensation Plan (the “Omnibus Plan”) to persons serving as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officeroperations, policies or Chief Operating Officer (each,practices. Mr. MacKenzie has been a “Covered Executive”), so long as the Covered Executive has held one or more of those titles (or any other title that contains such title) for a period of at least three years of consecutive service.

These changes acknowledge that these three positions consistently make and/or should make decisions that are in both the short-term and long-term interestsdirector of the Company since 2003 and extend the vesting of equity awards beyond the Covered Executive’s retirement date to reflect the desired accountability. The changes apply to awards that are granted or may be granted to a Covered Executive under the Omnibus Plan commencing on February 14, 2018. These changes did not affect any equity award granted under the Omnibus Plan prior to February 14, 2018.
Exceptserved as contemplated by the amended retirement provisions, the Company will not permit the acceleration of vesting of any long-term equity award granted under the Omnibus Plan on account of retirement of a Covered Executive. With respect to a Covered Executive, the amended retirement provisions for a long-term equity award state that such award will continue to vest over the normal vesting scheduleChairman of the award afterBoard from 2006 until 2018. He currently serves as a member of the Covered Executive has a separation from service based upon either normal retirement or early retirement. InAudit, Finance and Risk Committee and the event of a normal retirement of a Covered Executive, defined as having attained age 60 and fiveNominating/Corporate Governance Committee. The Company wishes to thank Mr. MacKenzie for his many years of service withto the Company or any subsidiary, an award will vest in full over the normal vesting scheduleBoard of the award. In the eventDirectors.
ITEM 9C.    DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS
Not applicable.
135

Table of an early retirement of a Covered Executive, defined as having attained age 55 and five years of service with the Company or any subsidiary, 75% of each award will vest over the normal vesting schedule of the award. Performance stock unit awards will continue to vest in accordance with their normal vesting schedule and shall be paid at the end of the three-year performance period based on actual performance. Any stock option granted after February 14, 2018 to a Covered Executive will remain exercisable for a period of two years after the retirement date.Contents

PART III
ITEM 10.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
ITEM 10.    DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
The information required by this item and not givenset forth below or in Item 1—Business—Executive Officers of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is incorporated by reference from the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, to be filed with the SEC within 120 days following the end of the fiscal year covered by this report, under the captions entitled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance,”Governance” and “Proposal 1—Election of Directors” and “Certain Beneficial Ownership Matters—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance.Directors.
We haveThe Company has adopted a Code of Ethics, which applies to directors, officers and employees. The full text of the Code of Ethics is publicly available on ourthe Company’s website at https://amwater.com. We intendThe Company intends to post on ourits website any amendments to ourthe Code of Ethics and any waivers of such provisions granted to certain principal officers.
ITEM 11.EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
ITEM 11.    EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, under the captions entitled “Proposal 1—Election of Directors—Director Compensation Table,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Executive Compensation,”Compensation” (excluding the subsection “Pay Versus Performance”), “Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation” and “Compensation Committee Report.”Report” (with the latter report being furnished, and not filed, in this Annual Report on Form 10-K).
ITEM 12.SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
ITEM 12.    SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Information required by this item setting forth the security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management is incorporated by reference in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, under the captions entitled “Certain Beneficial Ownership Matters—Security Ownership of Management,” “Certain Beneficial Ownership Matters—Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners” and “Equity Compensation Plan Information.”
ITEM 13.CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
ITEM 13.    CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, under the caption entitled “Board of Directors and Corporate Governance—Board Review of Related Person Transactions” and “Proposal 1—Election of Directors—Director Independence.”
ITEM 14.PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
ITEM 14.    PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
Information required by this item is incorporated by reference in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 20182023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders,Shareholders, under the caption entitled “Fees“Proposal 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Fees Paid to Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and “Pre-Approval“Proposal 4—Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm—Pre-Approval of Services Provided by Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm.”

136

PART IV
ITEM 15.EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)The following documents have been filed as a part of this Form 10-K:
1.The financial statements listed in the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K are hereby incorporated by reference in response to this Item 15(a).
2.Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required or are not applicable as the information is otherwise included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
3.Exhibits. The list of documents contained in “Exhibit Index” to this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference in response to this Item 15(a). The warranties, representations and covenants contained in any of the agreements included or incorporated by reference herein or which appear as exhibits hereto should not be relied upon by buyers, sellers or holders of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ securities and are not intended as warranties, representations or covenants to any individual or entity except as specifically set forth in such agreement.
ITEM 15.    EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)    The following documents have been filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:
1.The financial statements listed in the “Index to Consolidated Financial Statements” contained in Item 8—Financial Statements and Supplementary Data of this Form 10-K are hereby incorporated by reference in response to this Item 15(a).
2.Financial statement schedules have been omitted since they are either not required or are not applicable as the information is otherwise included in the financial statements or notes thereto.
3.Exhibits. The list of documents contained in “Exhibit Index” is provided in response to this Item 15(a). The warranties, representations and covenants contained in any of the agreements included or incorporated by reference herein or which appear as exhibits hereto should not be relied upon by buyers, sellers or holders of the Company’s or its subsidiaries’ securities and are not intended as warranties, representations or covenants to any individual or entity except as specifically set forth in such agreement.
The responses to Items 15(b) and (c) of Form 10-K are included above in response to Item 15(a).
ITEM 16.    FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None.
EXHIBIT INDEX
ITEM 16.FORM 10-K SUMMARY
None

EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit

Number
Exhibit Description
3.12.1.1#
2.1.2
2.2#
3.1
3.2
4.1
4.2
4.3
4.4
4.54.4
4.64.5
4.74.6
4.84.7
4.94.8
4.104.9
4.114.10
4.124.11
137

4.13Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
4.12
4.144.13
4.14
4.15
4.16
4.15
4.17
4.18
4.164.19
4.20
4.21
4.22
4.23
10.110.1#
10.2
10.3*
10.4*
10.5*
10.6*
10.7*

Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.5*
10.6*10.8*
10.7*10.8.1*
10.8.2*
10.9*
10.8.1*10.10.1*
10.8.2*10.10.2*
138

10.9*Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.11*
10.10.1*10.12.1*
10.10.2*
10.10.3*
10.10.4*
10.10.5*
10.10.6*
10.10.7*
10.10.8*
10.10.9*
10.10.10*
10.10.11*

10.12.2*
Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.10.12*
10.10.13*10.12.3*
10.10.14*
10.10.15*10.12.4*
10.10.16*
10.10.17*10.12.5*
10.10.18*
10.10.19*10.12.6*
10.10.20*
10.10.21*10.12.7*
10.10.22*
10.10.23*10.12.8*
10.10.24*
10.10.25*
10.10.26*
10.10.27*
10.10.28*10.12.9*
10.10.29*10.12.10*
10.10.30*
10.10.31*10.13.1*
10.10.32*10.13.2*
10.10.33*10.13.3*
10.13.4*
10.13.5*
10.13.6*
10.10.34*10.13.7*
10.13.8*
10.13.9*
10.13.10*
10.10.35*10.13.11*
10.10.36*
10.10.37*10.13.12*
10.10.38*

Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.11
10.12*
12.110.13.13*
10.13.14*
10.13.15*
10.13.16*
10.13.17*
10.13.18*
139

Exhibit
Number
Exhibit Description
10.13.19*
10.13.20*
10.13.21*
10.13.22*
10.13.23*
21.110.13.24*
10.13.25*
10.13.26*
10.13.27*
10.13.28*
10.13.29*
10.13.30*
10.13.31*
10.13.32*
10.14*
10.15*
10.16#*
10.17#
10.18
21.1
23.122.1
23.1
31.1
31.2
32.1
32.2
101101.INSThe following financial statements from American Water Works Company, Inc.’s Annual Report on Form 10-K forXBRL Instance Document - the period ended December 31, 2017, formattedinstance document does not appear in the Interactive Data File because its XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language): (i)tags are embedded within the Consolidated Balance Sheets; (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Operations; (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income; (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; (v) the Consolidated Statements of ChangesInline XBRL document.
101.SCHInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document
101.CALInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document
101.DEFInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document
101.LABInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase Document
101.PREInline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL with applicable taxonomy extension information contained in Stockholders’ Equity; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (filed herewith).Exhibits 101)
*Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
140

#    Certain schedules and exhibits to this agreement have been omitted pursuant to Item 601(a)(5) of Regulation S-K. The Company will furnish the omitted schedules and exhibits to the SEC upon request.
*    Denotes a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
Instruments defining the rights of holders of certain issues of long-term debt of the Company and certain of its consolidated subsidiaries have not been filed as exhibits to this report because the authorized principal amount of any one of such issues does not exceed 10% of the Company’s consolidated total assets. The Company agrees to furnish a copy of each such instrument to the SEC upon request.

The Stock Purchase Agreement filed as Exhibit 2.1.1, the Membership Interest Purchase Agreement filed as Exhibit 2.2, and the Secured Seller Note Agreement filed as Exhibit 10.17 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K have been included to provide investors and security holders with information regarding the terms of the respective agreements. The filing of these agreements is not intended to provide any other factual information about the parties thereto, or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. The representations, warranties and covenants contained in the respective agreements (i) were made by the parties thereto only for purposes of that respective agreement and as of specific dates; (ii) were made solely for the benefit of the parties to the respective agreement; (iii) may be subject to limitations agreed upon by the contracting parties, including being qualified by confidential disclosures exchanged between the parties in connection with the execution of the respective agreement (such disclosures include information that has been included in public disclosures, as well as additional non-public information); (iv) may have been made for the purposes of allocating contractual risk between the parties to the respective agreements instead of establishing these matters as facts; and (v) may be subject to standards of materiality applicable to the contracting parties to the respective agreements that differ from those applicable to investors.
Investors should not rely on the representations, warranties and covenants or any descriptions thereof as characterizations of the actual state of facts or condition of the parties to the respective agreements thereto, or any of their respective subsidiaries or affiliates. Additionally, the representations, warranties, covenants, conditions and other terms of the respective agreements may be subject to subsequent waiver or modification. Moreover, information concerning the subject matter of the representations, warranties and covenants may change after the date of the respective agreement, which subsequent information may or may not be fully reflected in the Company’s public disclosures. The respective agreements should not be read alone, but should instead be read in conjunction with the other information regarding the Company that is or will be contained in, or incorporated by reference into, the reports and other documents that are filed by the Company with the SEC.
141

SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on the 20th15th day of February, 2018.
2023.
AMERICAN WATER WORKS COMPANY, INC.
BY:
 
/s/ M. SUSAN N. STORYHARDWICK
M. Susan N. StoryHardwick
President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed on the 20th15th day of February, 2018,2023, by the following persons in the capacities indicated.
/s/ SUSAN N. STORY
/s/ MARTHA CLARK GOSS 

Susan N. Story
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
Martha Clark Goss
(Director)

 
/s/ LINDA G. SULLIVAN M. SUSAN HARDWICK
/s/ VERONICA JEFFREY N. EDWARDS
M. HAGENSusan Hardwick
President and Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer and Director)
Jeffrey N. Edwards
(Director)
Linda G. Sullivan
/s/ JOHN C. GRIFFITH
/s/ MARTHA CLARK GOSS
John C. Griffith
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial Officer)
Veronica M. Hagen
Martha Clark Goss
(Director)
 
/s/ MELISSA K. WIKLE 
/s/ KIMBERLY J. HARRIS
Melissa K. Wikle
Chief Accounting Officer
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Kimberly J. Harris
(Director)
/s/ LAURIE P. HAVANEC/s/ PATRICIA L. KAMPLING
Laurie P. Havanec
(Director)
Patricia L. Kampling
(Director)
 
/s/ JULIA L. JOHNSON
Melissa K. Wikle
Vice President and Controller
(Principal Accounting Officer)
Julia L. Johnson
(Director)
/s/ GEORGE MacKENZIE 
 
/s/ KARL F. KURZ
George MacKenzie
Julia L. Johnson
(Director)
Karl F. Kurz
(Director)

(Board Chair)

/s/ GEORGE MACKENZIE
/s/ MICHAEL L. MARBERRY
George MacKenzie
(Director)
Michael L. Marberry
(Director)
/s/ JAMES G. STAVRIDIS
James G. Stavridis
(Director)


134142