UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
 
Washington, D.C. 20549
 
FORM 10-K

[X]x
ANNUAL REPORT UNDERPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010
For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011
[  ]
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT UNDERPURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the transition period from              ________ to ________

Commission file number: 000-53482

 
TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP.
 (Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
 
Commission File Number: 0-53482
Nevada87-0294969
(State of other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)
304 Inverness Way South, Suite 365
Englewood, Colorado80112
(Address of Principal Executive Offices)(Zip Code)
 
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.
(303) 597-8737
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)Registrant’s Telephone Number, including Area Code)
Nevada, United States
87-0294969
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) (IRS Employer Identification Number)
3 Riverway, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77056
(Address of principal executive offices)
(361) 790-5831
 (Issuer’s telephone number)

Securities registered under SectionSECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(b) of the Exchange Act: OF THE ACT:None

Securities registered under SectionSECURITIES REGISTERED PURSUANT TO SECTION 12(g) of the Exchange Act:OF THE ACT:  Shares of common stock,Common Stock, par value $0.01

Indicate by checkmarkcheck mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes [ ]   o No [X ]x

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d)
of the Act.  [ ]Yes o Nox

Indicate by check markcheckmark whether the issuerregistrant (1) has  filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the pastpreceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes [  ]   x No [X]o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the issuerRegistrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (Section 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuerregistrant was required to submit and post such files).   Yes [  ] o No [X]o


Indicate by check markcheckmark if there is no disclosure of delinquent filers in responsepursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (Section 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained in this form,herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to thisthe Form 10-K. [ ]o

Indicate by check mark whether the issuerregistrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”,filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.Act (Check one):

Large accelerated filer[  ]Accelerated filer[  ]
Non-accelerated filer[  ]Smaller reporting company[X]
      Large Accelerated Filer o                                      Accelerated Filer o                              Non-Accelerated Filer o      Smaller Reporting Company  x


Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company.company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes [ ]    o No [X]x

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of a specified date within the past 60 days:

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant computed by reference to the price at which the registrant’s common equity was last sold, as of February 28, 2010 (the lastbusiness day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter) was approximately $3,606,334.  Sharesquarter:    As of February 28, 2011 the aggregate market value of the registrant’s voting common stock held by each current executive officer and director and by each person knownnon-affiliates of the registrant was $32,366,130 based upon the closing sale price of the common stock as reported by the registrant to own 5% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this computation in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates.  This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for any other purpose.OTCQB.

State the
The number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes ofRegistrant’s common equity,stock outstanding as of the latest practicable date: 26,781,259 shares of common stock as of January 31, 2011.November 8, 2011 was 34,622,509

DocumentsDOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions of our Definitive Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the 2011 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference:  Nonereference to Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.




 
 
 

 
Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS
  Page
 Glossary of Terms4
 Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking Statements6
 Part I 
Item 1Business68
Item 1ARisk Factors1613
Item 1BUnresolved Staff Comments25
Item 2Properties2325
Item 3Legal Proceedings2329
Item 4(REMOVED AND RESERVED)2329
 Part II 
Item 5Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities2430
Item 6Selected Financial Data2531
Item 7Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations2532
Item 7AQuantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk2836
Item 8Financial Statements and Supplementary Data2936
Item 9Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure4252
Item 9AControls and Procedures4252
Item 9BOther Information4353
 Part III 
Item 10Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance4554
Item 11Executive Compensation4754
Item 12Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters4854
Item 13Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Director Independence4954
Item 14Principal Accountant Fees and Services5154
Item 15Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules5155
  
Signatures5257
  


 
 

 
PRELIMINARY NOTES

As used in this Annual Report on Form 10-K (“Annual Report”), references to “Texas Rare Earths”, “the Company,” “we,” “our,” or “us” mean Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. and its predecessors, as the context requires.

Glossary of TermsGLOSSARY OF TERMS
 
Alteration
Any physical or chemical change in a rock or mineral subsequent to its formation.
 
Breccia
A rock in which angular fragments are surrounded by a mass of fine-grained minerals.
 
Concession
A grant of a tract of land made by a government or other controlling authority in return for stipulated services or a promise that the land will be used for a specific purpose.
 
Core
The long cylindrical piece of a rock, about an inch in diameter, brought to the surface by diamond drilling.
 
Diamond drilling
A drilling method in which the cutting is done by abrasion using diamonds embedded in a matrix rather than by percussion.  The drill cuts a core of rock, which is recovered in long cylindrical sections.
 
Drift
A horizontal underground opening that follows along the length of a vein or rock formation as opposed to a cross-cut which crosses the rock formation.
 
Exploration
Work involved in searching for ore, usually by drilling or driving a drift.
 
Exploration expenditures
Costs incurred in identifying areas that may warrant examination and in examining specific areas that are considered to have prospects that may contain mineral deposit reserves.
 
Grade
The average assay of a ton of ore, reflecting metal content.
 
Host rock
The rock surrounding an ore deposit.
 
Intrusive
A body of igneous rock formed by the consolidation of magma intruded into other rocks, in contrast to lavas, which are extruded upon the surface.
 
Lode
A mineral deposit in solid rock.
 
Ore
The naturally occurring material from which a mineral or minerals of economic value can be extracted profitably or to satisfy social or political objectives. The term is generally but not always used to refer to metalliferous material, and is often modified by the names of the valuable constituent; e.g., iron ore.
 
Ore body
A continuous, well-defined mass of material of sufficient ore content to make extraction economically feasible.
 
Mine development
The work carried out for the purpose of opening up a mineral deposit and making the actual ore extraction possible.
 
Mineral
A naturally occurring homogeneous substance having definite physical properties and chemical composition, and if formed under favorable conditions, a definite crystal form.forms.
 
Mineralization
The presence of economic minerals in a specific area or geological formation.
 
-4-

Mineral reserve
That part of a mineral deposit which could be economically and legally extracted or produced at the time of the reserve determination.  Reserves are customarily stated in terms of “Ore” when dealing with metalliferous minerals.
 
-4-

Probable (Indicated) reserves
 
Reserves for which quantity and grade and/or quality are computed from information similar to that used for proven (measure) reserves, but the sites for inspection, sampling, and measurement are farther apart or are otherwise less adequately spaced.  The degree of assurance, although lower than that for proven (measured) reserves, is high enough to assume continuity between points of observation.
 
Prospect
 
Proven (Measured) reserves
 
A mining property, the value of which has not been determined by exploration.
 
Reserves for which (a) quantity is computed from dimensions revealed in outcrops, trenches, workings or drill holes; grade and/or quality are computed from the results of detailed sampling and (b) the sites for inspection, sampling and measurement are spaced so closely and the geologic character is so well defined that size, shape, depth and mineral content of reserves are well-established.
 
Resources
The calculated amount of material in a mineral deposit, based on limited drill information.
 
Tonne
A metric ton which is equivalent to 2,200 pounds.
 
Trend
A general term for the direction or bearing of the outcrop of a geological feature of any dimension, such as a layer, vein, ore body, or fold.
 
Unpatented mining claim
A parcel of property located on federal lands pursuant to the General Mining Law and the requirements of the state in which the unpatented claim is located, the paramount title of which remains with the federal government. The holder of a valid, unpatented lode-mining claim is granted certain rights including the right to explore and mine such claim.
 
Vein
A mineralized zone having a more or less regular development in length, width, and depth, which clearly separates it from neighboring rock.






 
-5-

 
PART ICAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

Cautionary Notice Regarding Forward-Looking StatementsThis Annual Report on Form 10-K and the exhibits attached hereto contain “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (collectively, “forward-looking statements”). Such forward-looking statements concern the Company’s anticipated results and developments in the Company’s operations in future periods, planned exploration and development of its properties, plans related to its business and other matters that may occur in the future.  These statements relate to analyses and other information that are based on forecasts of future results, estimates of amounts not yet determinable and assumptions of management.
 
In additionAny statements that express or involve discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs, plans, projections, objectives, assumptions or future events or performance (often, but not always, using words or phrases such as “expects” or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not anticipate”, “plans”, “estimates” or “intends”, or stating that certain actions, events or results “may”, “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken, occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical information,fact and may be forward-looking statements.  Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report containson Form 10-K, includes, but is not limited to:

·  The progress, potential and uncertainties of the Company’s 2011-2012 rare-earth drill program and exploration plans at it Round Top project in Hudspeth County, Texas (the “Round Top Project”);

·  The success of getting the necessary permits for future drill programs and future project development;

·  Expectations regarding the ability to raise capital and to continue its exploration and development plans on its properties;

·  Plans regarding anticipated expenditures at the Round Top Project; and

·  Plans outlined under the section heading “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Plan of Operation”.

Forward-looking statements that plan forare subject to a variety of known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause actual events or anticipateresults to differ from those expressed or implied by the future,forward-looking statements, including, without limitation,limitation:
·  risks associated with the Company’s history of losses and need for additional financing;
·  risks associated with the Company’s limited operating history;
·  risks associated with the Company’s properties all being in the exploration stage;
·  risks associated with the Company’s lack of history in producing metals from its properties;
·  risks associated with a shortage of equipment and supplies;
·  risks associated with the Company’s need for additional financing to develop a producing mine, if warranted;
·  risks associated with the Company’s exploration activities not being commercially successful;
·  risks associated with increased costs affecting the Company’s financial condition;
·  risks associated with a shortage of equipment and supplies adversely affecting the Company’s ability to operate;
·  risks associated with mining and mineral exploration being inherently dangerous;
·  risks associated with mineralization estimates;
·  risks associated with changes in mineralization estimates affecting the economic viability of the Company’s properties ;
·  risks associated with uninsured risks;
·  risks associated with mineral operations being subject to market forces beyond the Company’s control;
·  risks associated with fluctuations in commodity prices;
·  risks associated with permitting, licenses and approval processes;
·  risks associated with the governmental and environmental regulations;
·  risks associated with future legislation regarding the mining industry and climate change;
-6-

·  risks associated with potential environmental lawsuits;
·  risks associated with the Company’s land reclamation requirements;
·  risks associated with rare earth and beryllium mining presenting potential health risks;
·  risks related to title in the Company’s properties
·  risks related to competition in the mining and rare earth elements industries;
·  risks related to economic conditions;
·  risks related to our ability to manage growth;
·  risks related to the potential difficulty of attracting and retaining qualified personnel;
·  risks related to the Company’s dependence on key personnel;
·  risks related to the Company’s SEC filing history; and
·  risks related to the Company’s securities.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the Company’s forward-looking statements. Some of the important risks and uncertainties that could affect forward-looking statements are described further under the captions “Descriptionsection headings “Item 1. Description of Business,” “Riskthe Business”, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” and “Management’s“Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or Plan of Operation.” TheseFinancial Condition and Results of Operations” of this Annual Report. Although the Company has attempted to identify important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in forward-looking statements, includethere may be other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated, estimated or intended. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, believed, estimated or expected. The Company cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any such forward-looking statements, about our future business plans and strategies, future actions, future performance, costs and expenses, interest rates, outcomewhich speak only as of contingencies, financial condition, resultsthe date made. Except as required by law, the Company disclaims any obligation subsequently to revise any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of operations, liquidity, objectivessuch statements or to reflect the occurrence of management, and other such matters, as well as certain projections and business trends, and most otheranticipated or unanticipated events. The Company qualifies all the forward-looking statements that are not historicalcontained in nature, that are “forward-looking”this Annual Report by the foregoing cautionary statements.

-7-

PART I
ItemITEM 1.  Description of BusinessDESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Corporate organizationOrganization and History

The Company was incorporated as a business corporation in the State of Nevada in 1970 under the name “Standard Silver Corporation.”  The Company changed its name from “Standard Silver Corporation” to “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.” (“TRER”), effective as of September 1, 2010.  We do not currently have any subsidiaries.

Our common stock is currently listed for quotation inon the Pink Sheets,OTCQB market tier of OTC Markets, Inc., a centralized quotation service maintained by OTC Markets Inc. that collects and publishes market maker quotes for over-the-counter securities (PK:(OTCQB:TRER).  Our executive office is located at 304 Inverness Way South, Suite 365, Englewood, Colorado 80112. The telephone number for our executive office is (303) 597-8737. We maintain a website at trer.com.

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1970.  In July 2004, our articles of incorporation were amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 25,000,000 common shares and, in April 2007, we affected a 1-for-2 reverse stock split.  

In September 2008, our articles of incorporation were further amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 100,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01 per share and to authorize 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.  

The Company’s fiscal year-end is August 31.

The CompanyNarrative Description of Business

We are a mining company engaged in the business of the acquisition, exploration and development of mineral properties.  We currently hold a twenty year lease executed in August 2010, to explore and develop an 860 acre rare earth uranium-beryllium prospectearths mineral project located in Hudspeth County, Texas known as “Round Top”the Round Top Project and prospecting permits covering an adjacent 9,345 acres.  We also hold prospecting permits on certain other mineral properties located in Texas and New Mexico.  We currently have limited operations and have not established that our Round Top propertyProject contains any proven reserves or probable reserves.  The strategic necessity of developing rare earth resources, the compelling fundamentals of uranium and the future potential for beryllium in the nuclear fuel cycle all present what we believe to be excellent opportunities for us.reserves as defined under SEC Industry Guide 7.

The Round Top rare earth prospectProject was originally explored and developed in the late 1980's as a high grade beryllium resource. During the courseexploration of this project it was discovered thatarea, heavy rare earthearths and uranium mineralization were also present.discovered. Market conditions precluded commercialization of these elements at that time.  Recent technology and geopoliticalmarket developments however, have increased the interest in and demand for rare earth elements.  Increased demand for nuclear powerelements and medical applications has renewed interest in uranium. New beryllium applications are also now potentially emerging.further exploration of the rare earth elements at the Round Top Project is warranted.   Our current focus is on the exploration of the Round Top Project with the long-term goal of becoming a high volume, low cost producer of heavy rare earths.

The Round Top rhyolite host rock which caps the beryllium deposits has potential to be a large resource of rare earth minerals.  According to a report published by the Texas Bureau of Economic Geology (a copy of which can be found at http://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM72/AM72_1122.pdf and referred to herein as the “Round Top Report”) heavy rare earth elements make up 67% of the total rare earth element content at the Round Top Project.

Recent Corporate Developments

The following significant corporate developments occurred during our fiscal year ended August 31, 2011:

·  On October 5, 2010, we announced the execution of a 20-year lease with the Texas General Land Office covering 860 acres at the Round Top Project.

-8-

·  On February 1, 2011, and February 15, 2011, we completed equity private placement financings for gross aggregate proceeds of $4.0 million.  We placed a total of 1,600,000 shares of common stock at $2.50 per share and issued five-year warrants to purchase 1,600,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share. Additionally, we granted a 120-day option to these investors to purchase up to 6,400,000 shares of our common stock at a purchase price of $2.50 per share, with 100% warrant coverage.

·  On March 24, 2011, our common stock was upgraded to OTC Market’s OTCQB market tier

·  On May 3, 2011, we announced the appointment of Marc LeVier as our President and Chief Executive Officer.

·  On May 18, 2011, the Texas General Land Office approved our exploration plan for our Round Top Project.  The plan calls for the completion of approximately 50 drill holes totaling at least 12,000 feet of reverse circulation drilling, close-spaced aero-magnetic/gamma ray spectrography surveys. Samples recovered from the drilling will be used for the metallurgical characterization and testing.
·  
On June 10, 2011, we announced that we had received $15.6 million through the successful completion of the second stage of our financings previously closed in February of 2011.

·  On July 11, 2011, exploration drilling began at the Round Top Project site. This program includes approximately 50 drill holes totaling at least 12,000 feet of reverse circulation drilling.

·  On August 9, 2011, we appointed Anthony Garcia as Senior Vice President of Project Development to oversee the Company’s efforts at the Round Top project.

·  On August 16, 2011, Aeroquest Airborne completed the Tri-Axial Magnetic Gradiometer airborne survey over the Round Top Project area. The aeromagnetic geophysical data successfully mapped rhyolite dome complexes at the surface and their roots at depth, distinguished between older, less differentiated, and younger, more differentiated complexes, and mapped structures that appear to be related to the rhyolite intrusions and mineralization. Three dimensional (3-D) inversion modeling is currently under way to generate a 3-D magnetic susceptibility model which will be used to design drill testing of deeper targets in the future.

·  On August 23, 2011, we expanded our exploration program at our Round Top Project over the next twelve months into three phases and over a broader area based on our aeromagnetic survey results.

Plan of Operations

Source of Funds for Fiscal Year Ending August 31, 2012

The Company’s primary source of funds since incorporation has been through the issuance of common stock. As of August 31, 2011, the Company had cash and cash equivalents of $16,886,066 and a working capital surplus of approximately $16,344,000. We will require additional financing to continue our exploration and development activities.  We currently have sufficient working capital to complete our planned exploration and development activities on the Round Top Project through calendar year 2012.

Use of Funds for Fiscal Year Ending August 31, 2012

The Company’s current capital expenditures are for the exploration/acquisition and evaluation expenses of its Round Top Project.  For fiscal 2012, the Company estimates that it might expend $1.6 million on general/administrative expenses and $8.8 million on exploration expenses.  

-9-

Trends – Rare-Earth Market

Rare earth elements (or “REEs”) are a group of chemically similar elements that usually are found together in nature; they are referred to as the “lanthanide series.” These individual elements have a variety of characteristics that are important in a wide range of technologies, products, and applications and are critical inputs in existing and emerging applications including: computer hard drives, cell phones, clean energy technologies, such as hybrid and electric vehicles and wind power turbines; multiple high-tech uses, including fiber optics, lasers and hard disk drives; numerous defense applications, such as guidance and control systems and global positioning systems; and advanced water treatment technology for use in industrial, military and outdoor recreation applications. As a result, global demand for R EEREE is projected to steadily increase due to continuing growth in existing applications and increased innovation and development of new end uses.  Interest in developing resources domestically has become a strategic necessity as there are at present extremelyis limited sourcesproduction of these elements outside of China.  We believe the partially explored Round Top rhyolite which caps the beryllium deposits could be a large resourceOur ability to raise additional funds in order to complete our plan of rare earth elements.  According to a report published by the Bureau of Economic Geology (a copy of which can be founddevelopment athttp://www.minsocam.org/ammin/AM72/AM72_1122.pdf and referred to herein as the “Round Top Report”) heavy rare earth elements make up 67% of the total rare earth element content at Round Top.

-6-

The strategic necessity of developing rare earth resources, the compelling fundamentals of uranium and the future potential for beryllium in the nuclear fuel cycle all present what we believe to be excellent opportunities for us.  Collateral benefits and features of the Round Top project are:Project may be impacted by future prices for REEs.

·  Preliminary drill sampling has indicated ore grade faces of both the beryllium and the uranium.
·  The mine is in excellent shape with all services still in place including vent fan and bag-house for filtering the reverse circulated air.
·  The Round Top rhyolite is well situated for large scale, low cost open pit mining.
·  Location on Texas lands, and under the permitting jurisdiction of the State of Texas.
·  No federal land use agency is in any way involved.
·  Location in a sparsely populated, economically distressed county.
·  Ready access to power and water and with rail and highway transportation within four miles.
Sources and Availability of Raw Materials

We intend to (i) conduct a geologic, and radiometric study of the surface of the rhyolite to define areas where beryllium, rare earth minerals and thorium are concentrated in fractures, breccias or magmatic segregations, and to understand the distribution of uranium in this rock, (ii) conduct radiation and geologic mapping underground to better define the distribution and habit of occurrence of the uranium, (iii) re-log drill samples that are stored on the property with emphasis on uranium and rare metal distribution, (iv) conduct a sampling and laboratory examination program to determine the precise mineralogy of the rare elementsThe Company is currently in the rhyolite,exploration stage and (v) use these resultsas such does not require any significant raw materials in order to develop a drill programcarry out its primary operating activities. The Company’s primary operating objective is to test higher grade rare earth targets deeper in the rhyolite.

Beryllium is a lightweight metal possessing unique mechanicalexplore and thermal properties. Its specific stiffness is much greater than other engineered structured material such as steel. The physical and mechanical properties of beryllium include high stiffness-to-weight and strength-to-weight ratios, stability within a broad range of temperatures, resistance to corrosion and fatigue, excellent electric conductivity and one of the highest melting points of all light metals. Beryllium products are used in a variety of high performance applications in the defense, aerospace, industrial, scientific equipment, electronics (including acoustics), medical, automotive, optical scanning and oil and gas markets.  We believe Round Top could possess the potential to produce beryllium.

In addition to Round Top, we also own unpatented mining claims covering the Old Dude Mine, located in Sierra County, New Mexico, and the HA claim group located in Luna County, New Mexico.  The Old Dude Mine has a production history of silver dating from the 1890’s.  The HA claims cover an andesite hosted vein system similar to and some 10 miles to the southwest of the Macho District. These claims surround another historic producer, the Graphic Mine. The geologic setting at the HA property is the same as the Macho.

Overview ofdevelop the Round Top Rare Earth-Uranium-Beryllium Project

Round TopProject. For at least the next year, the Company is a small mountain, oneexpected to continue to require the use of a group of five that comprisescontract drilling services in order to obtain additional geological information. In the Sierra Blanca, located in Hudspeth County approximately eight miles northwest ofpast year the town of Sierra Blanca. The property is reached by a private road that turns north off Interstate 10 access road approximately one mile west ofCompany has been able to secure contract drilling services without excessive delay and costs. We except the town of Sierra Blanca.

-7-


In November 2007, we purchasedcontract drilling services will continue to be available over the prospecting permits covering Sections 5, 7, 8, and 18 of Township 7, Block 71, and most of Sections 12 and 13 of Township 7, Block 72, Hudspeth County, Texas. In September 2009, this land position was expanded when the prospecting permits for Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 32 and 33 of Township 7, Block 71 were acquired.  In August 2010, we entered into a mining lease with the Texas General Land Office covering Sections 7 and 18 of Township 7, Block 71 and Section 12 of Block 72, covering approximately 860 acres in Hudspeth County, Texas.  The mining lease issued by the Texas General Land Office gives us the right to explore, produce, develop, mine, extract, mill, remove, and market beryllium, uranium, rare earth elements, all other base and precious metals, ind ustrial minerals and construction materials and all other minerals excluding oil, gas, coal, lignite, sulfur, salt, and potash.  The term of the lease is twenty years so long as minerals are produced in paying quantities.

Under the lease, we will pay the State of Texas a lease bonus of $197,800, $35,000 of which was paid upon the execution of the lease, $65,000 of which will be due when we submit our initial plan of operations to conduct exploration, and $97,800 of which will be due when we submit a supplemental plan of operations to conduct mining.  Upon the sale of minerals removed from Round Top, we will pay the State of Texas a $500,000 minimum advance royalty.  Thereafter, we will pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from Round Top and six and one quarter percent (6 ¼%) of the market value of all other minerals removed and sold from Round Top.

-8-

If production of paying quantities of minerals has not been obtained on or before August 17, 2011, we may pay the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the term of the lease in an amount equal to $44,718.  Thereafter, assuming production of paying quantities has not been obtained, we may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:
  Per Acre Amount  Total Amount 
August 17, 2012 – 2014 $50  $44,718 
August 17, 2015 – 2019 $75  $67,077 
August 17, 2019 – 2024 $150  $134,155 
August 17, 2025 – 2029 $200  $178,873 
next year.

The Round Top rare earth-uranium-beryllium prospect was initially drilled in 1984raw materials that the Company’s current operations rely on are gasoline and 1985, duringdiesel fuel for the exploration vehicles and for the heavy equipment required to build roads and conduct drilling operations. Water is provided per service contract by Eagle Mountain Gang which timeis used for the ore body known as the "West End Ore Zone" was discovered. There were 1,115 feet of underground workings driven and additional reverse circulation and diamond drilling done both on the surface and underground. The operator at the time ultimately abandoned the project, ostensibly because of their inability to develop a viable market for beryllium.operations.

Description of Rare Earth and other Rare ElementsSeasonality

During the course of the beryllium exploration, approximately 200 drill holes penetrated varying thicknesses of the rhyolite volcanic rock that makes up the mass of Round Top Mountain and caps the beryllium-uranium deposits which occurSeasonality in the underlying limestones; some 100 more were drilled on Little Round Top, Sierra Blanca and Little Blanca Mountains.

Thestate of Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, working with the project geologists, conducted an extensive investigation of the rhyolite to better understand its rare metal content. This research shows that the rhyolite laccoliths at Sierra Blanca are enriched in a variety of REEs and other rare elements such as tantalum, niobium, thorium and lithium. They analyzed a series of samples from outcrop and drill holes and studied the geochemistry and mineralogy of the rhyolite. The results of their research were published in the Round Top Report, which stated that the Round Top rhyolites are so enriched that they should be considered large-tonnage, low grade resources of several rare metals, including yttrium, heavy rare earths, niobium, tantalum, lithium and thorium. The Round Top rhyolite is estimated to contain at least 1.6 billion metric tons. The other rhyolite bodies, particular Little Round Top have similar potential. Most of the rare elements occur in discrete minerals and may be amenable to conventional floatation, gravity, or some combination of these processes of concentration.  Although thorium is highly enriched in the rhyolite, it occurs as the separate mineral, thorite, and is not chemically combined with the REE's thus simplifying any ultimate processing of these concentrates.  The Round Top rhyolite requires further evaluation of its mineralogical makeup and economic modeling to determine the appropriate course for potential future commercial development. However, the size of this rhyolite deposit, the fact that 67% of the total rare earth elements are the heavy elements and the projected increase in their demand could result in its becoming a reliable and long term domestic source for these increasingly strategic metals.

Importantly, aside from the large scale-low grade potential, there is geologic evidence that suggests that higher grade concentrations of these elements may be present in the deeper parts of this mineralizing system. Only the upper parts of the rhyolite body have been drilled and there was no thought given to developing the potential rare earth resources at the time of the Cabot-Cyprus project.

The rare earth element supply has been dominated by China, which has historically used its ability to overproduce as a means of discouraging development by others. It is now universally thought that China will soon utilize their production domestically and that as a result, their declining resources will not be availablematerial factor to the rest of the developed world.  This "drying up" of the Chinese source comes at a time when there is a virtual "explosion" in the uses of these elements. Rare earth elements have a wide variety of useful characteristics and are currently components in a number of commercial products and critical applications across industries ranging from defense to medical to high technology. Their applicability to green energy technologies has generated considerable recent interest. An example is their potential use i n the manufacture of super strength permanent magnets, a major emerging area of development. The market has focused mainly on their use in small hybrid vehicles and wind turbines. We believe that these applications are important, but that the adoption of this new technology to reduce energy costs, particularly diesel, by the traditional heavy trucking, railroads, construction, mining and other heavy industry will stimulate a demand greater than even that of the most optimistic of forecasters.

-9-

Uranium

The presence of uranium has long been known. Various companies conducted reconnaissance in the area during the last cycle of uranium activity in the 1970’s. This exploration was inCompany’s operations for its beginning stages when the uranium market collapsed in the early 1980’s.  The prior operator of the project logged visible uranium mineralization in several drill holes but low prices prevailing at the time of the project precluded any interest on their part. No radiometric logging of the drill holes was done and no radiation measurement was done in the mine workings.

We believe the market fundamentals for uranium are strong and that there may be a shortfall of supply which will widen in the coming years, primarily based on:

·  Usage should increase as a result of planned expansion of nuclear power.
·  In all likelihood, the expansion of nuclear power will be greater than presently predicted owing to its efficiency, which can be expected to improve as advanced reactor designs come on stream.
·  The price of U3O8 (producer yellowcake) is a relatively small increment of total nuclear power costs, unlike the cost of gas and coal for the power they produce.
·  Utility companies are acutely aware of the future supply problems and at some point will have to start supporting exploration and development in order to assure their long term supply.
·  Increasing medical technology applications.

Beryllium

Beryllium is a light, strong, very ridged metal with high thermal conductivity. Beryllium is most commonly used as an alloy with other metals, particularly copper, to make springs, contacts and other applications where rigidity, fatigue resistance and good electrical and thermal conductivity are required. Many everyday electronic applications use beryllium-copper alloys in contacts and current carrying springs.  Pure beryllium metal and high beryllium alloys are also used where reliable, dimensionally stable parts are needed in high stress or high heat environments. Transparency to x-ray and other radiation is another important characteristic of beryllium metal.  Companies engaged in aerospace, X-ray equipment manufacturing, oil drilling, sub-atomic particle research, and nuclear reactor industries are the primary users of beryllium metal. Beryllia (BeO) ceramics are used where superior heat conductivity and light weight are required.

Beryllium is not an exchanged traded commodity and its marketing is done under negotiated terms.  We believe that the addition of beryllium oxide to a conventional nuclear fuel pellet may extend the life of a fuel rod.  The mixed uranium-beryllium oxide fuel more efficiently transfers heat out of the rods and prevents degradation of the fuel because of excessive heat retention.project.

Competition

The mining industry is highly competitive.  We will be competing with numerous companies, substantially all with far greater financial resources available to them.  We therefore will be at a significant disadvantage in the course of acquiring mining properties and obtaining materials, supplies, labor, and equipment.  Additionally, we are and will continue to be an insignificant participant in the business of mining properties.exploration and mineral property development.  A large number of established and well-financed companies are active in the mining industry and will have an advantage over us if they are competing for the same properties.  Nearly all such entities have greater financial resources, technical expertise and managerial capabilities than ourselves and, consequently, we will be at a competitive disadvantage in identifying po ssiblepossible mining properties and procuring the same.

China accounts for the vast majority of rare earth element production.  While rare earth element projects exist outside of China, very few are in actual production. Further, given the timeline for current exploration projects to come into production, if at all, it is likely that the Chinese will be able to dominate the market for rare earth elements into the future.  This gives the Chinese a competitive advantage in controlling the supply of rare earth elements and engaging in competitive price reductions to discourage competition.  Any increase in the amount of rare earth elements exported from other nations, and increased competition, may result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of potential market share, any of which could materially adversely affect our profitability. As a result of these factors, we may not be able to compete effectively against current and future competitors.

-10-

Government Approvals

The exploration, drilling and mining industries operate in a legal environment that requires permits to conduct virtually all operations.  Thus permits are required by local, state and federal government agencies.   Local authorities, usually counties, also have control over mining activity.  The various permits address such issues as prospecting, development, production, labor standards, taxes, occupational health and safety, toxic substances, air quality, water use, water discharge, water quality, noise, dust, wildlife impacts, as well as other environmental and socioeconomic issues.

-10-

Prior to receiving the necessary permits to explore or mine, the operator must comply with all regulatory requirements imposed by all governmental authorities having jurisdiction over the project area.  Very often, in order to obtain the requisite permits, the operator must have its land reclamation, restoration or replacement plans pre-approved. Specifically, the operator must present its plan as to how it intends to restore or replace the affected area. Often all or any of these requirements can cause delays or involve costly studies or alterations of the proposed activity or time frame of operations, in order to mitigate impacts.  All of these factors make it more difficult and costly to operate and have a negative and sometimes fatal impact on the viability of the exploration or mining operation. Finally, it is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant impact on our business, causing those activities to be economically reevaluated at that time.

Effect of Existing or Probable Government and Environmental Regulations

Mineral exploration, including mining operations are subject to governmental regulation. Our operations may be affected in varying degrees by government regulation such as restrictions on production, price controls, tax increases, expropriation of property, environmental and pollution controls or changes in conditions under which minerals may be marketed. An excess supply of certain minerals may exist from time to time due to lack of markets, restrictions on exports, and numerous factors beyond our control. These factors include market fluctuations and government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, allowable production and importing and exporting minerals. The effect of these factors cannot be accurately determined, and we are not aware of any probable government regulations that would impact the Company.  This section is intended as a brief overview of the laws and regulations described herein and is not intended to be a comprehensive treatment of the subject matter.
 
Overview.  Like all other mining companies doing business in the United States, we are subject to a variety of federal, state and local statutes, rules and regulations designed to protect the quality of the air and water, and threatened or endangered species, in the vicinity of its operations. These include “permitting” or pre-operating approval requirements designed to ensure the environmental integrity of a proposed mining facility, operating requirements designed to mitigate the effects of discharges into the environment during exploration, mining operations, and reclamation or post-operation requirements designed to remediate the lands affected by a mining facility once commercial mining operations have ceased.
 
Federal legislation in the United States and implementing regulations adopted and administered by the Environmental Protection Agency, the Forest Service, the Bureau of Land Management, the Fish and Wildlife Service, the Army Corps of Engineers and other agencies—in particular, legislation such as the federal Clean Water Act, the Clean Air Act, the National Environmental Policy Act, the Endangered Species Act, the National Forest Management Act, the Wilderness Act, and the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act—have a direct bearing on domestic mining operations. These federal initiatives are often administered and enforced through state agencies operating under parallel state statutes and regulations.
 
The Clean Water Act.  The federal Clean Water Act is the principal federal environmental protection law regulating mining operations in the United States as it pertains to water quality.
 
At the state level, water quality is regulated by the Environment Department, Water and Waste Management Division under the Water Quality Act (state). If our exploration or any future development activities might affect a ground water aquifer, it will have to apply for a Ground Water Discharge Permit from the Ground Water Quality Bureau in compliance with the Groundwater Regulations. If exploration affects surface water, then compliance with the Surface Water Regulations is required.
 
-11-

The Clean Air Act.Act.  The federal Clean Air Act establishes ambient air quality standards, limits the discharges of new sources and hazardous air pollutants and establishes a federal air quality permitting program for such discharges. Hazardous materials are defined in the federal Clean Air Act and enabling regulations adopted under the federal Clean Air Act to include various metals. The federal Clean Air Act also imposes limitations on the level of particulate matter generated from mining operations.
  
National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA).  NEPA requires all governmental agencies to consider the impact on the human environment of major federal actions as therein defined.
 
-11-

Endangered Species Act (ESA).  The ESA requires federal agencies to ensure that any action authorized, funded or carried out by such agency is not likely to jeopardize the continued existence of any endangered or threatened species or result in the destruction or adverse modification of their critical habitat. In order to facilitate the conservation of imperiled species, the ESA establishes an interagency consultation process. When a federal agency proposes an action that “may affect” a listed species, it must consult with the USFWS and must prepare a “biological assessment” of the effects of a major construction activity if the USFWS advises that a threatened species may be present in the area of the activity.
 
National Forest Management Act.Act.  The National Forest Management Act, as implemented through title 36 of the Code of Federal Regulations, provides a planning framework for lands and resource management of the National Forests. The planning framework seeks to manage the National Forest System resources in a combination that best serves the public interest without impairment of the productivity of the land, consistent with the Multiple Use Sustained Yield Act of 1960.
 
Wilderness Act.Act.  The Wilderness Act of 1964 created a National Wilderness Preservation System composed of federally owned areas designated by Congress as “wilderness areas” to be preserved for future use and enjoyment.
 
The Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA).  CERCLA imposes clean-up and reclamation responsibilities with respect to discharges into the environment, and establishes significant criminal and civil penalties against those persons who are primarily responsible for such discharges.
 
The Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA).  RCRA was designed and implemented to regulate the disposal of solid and hazardous wastes. It restricts solid waste disposal practices and the management, reuse or recovery of solid wastes and imposes substantial additional requirements on the subcategory of solid wastes that are determined to be hazardous. Like the Clean Water Act, RCRA provides for citizens’ suits to enforce the provisions of the law.
 
National Historic Preservation Act.Act.  The National Historic Preservation Act was designed and implemented to protect historic and cultural properties. Compliance with the Act is necessary where federal properties or federal actions are undertaken, such as mineral exploration on federal land, which may impact historic or traditional cultural properties, including native or Indian cultural sites.

In the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, we incurred minimal costs in complying with environmental laws and regulations in relation to our operating activities.  Costs in the fiscal year ended August 31, 2012 will be substantially similar, but slightly higher due to our anticipated increased drilling activities at our Round Top Project.

Mine Safety and Health Administration Regulations

Pursuant to Section 1503(a) of the recently enacted Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (The “Dodd-Frank Act”), issuers that are operators, or that have a subsidiary that is an operator, of a coal or other mine in the United States are required to disclose in their periodic reports filed with the SEC information regarding specified health and safety violations, orders and citations, related assessments and legal actions, and mining-related fatalities. During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, our U.S. exploration properties were not subject to regulation by the Federal Mine Safety and Health Administration (“MSHA”) under the Federal Mine Safety and Health Act of 1977 (the "Mine Act").
-12-

Employees

Including our executive officers, we currently have four full timenine employees.  In order to implement our business plan, we will be required to employWe also retain qualified technical contractors through a third party administrator and administrative employees or retainutilize the services of qualified consultants with the technical expertise to evaluate the mineral properties.

Insurance

We currently do not maintain any insurance coverage to cover losses or risks incurred in the ordinary course of business.

Researchgeological and Development

The Company has spent only nominal amounts during each of the last two fiscal years on research and development activities.

-12-

Facilities

Our current headquarters are located at 3 Riverway, Suite 1800, Houston, Texas 77056, and we maintain an additional office at 7 Copana Pt., Rockport, Texas 78382.

Description of our Capital Stock

We are authorized to issue 100,000,000 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, of which 26,781,259 shares were issued and outstanding as of February 8, 2011.  We are also authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.001, none of which have been issued as of February 8, 2011.

Common Stock

The holders of common stock are entitled to one vote per share with respect to all matters required by law to be submitted to stockholders.  The holders of common stock have the sole right to vote, except as otherwise provided by law or by our certificate of incorporation, including provisions governing any preferred stock.  The common stock does not have any cumulative voting, preemptive, subscription or conversion rights.  Election of directors and other general stockholder action requires the affirmative vote of a majority of shares represented at a meeting in which a quorum is represented.  The outstanding shares of common stock are validly issued, fully paid and non-assessable.

Subject to the rights of any outstanding shares of preferred stock, the holders of common stock are entitled to receive dividends, if declared by our board of directors out of funds legally available.  In the event of liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution to them after payment or provision for all liabilities and any preferential liquidation rights of any preferred stock then outstanding.

 The authorized but unissued shares of our common stock are available for future issuance without shareholder approval. These additional shares may be used for a variety of corporate purposes, including future public offering to raise additional capital, corporate acquisitions and employee benefit plans. The existence of authorized but unissued shares of common stock may enable our Board to issue shares of stock to persons friendly to existing management, which may deter or frustrate a takeover of the Company.

Preferred Stock

We are authorized to issue of blank check authorized preferred stock.  No shares of preferred stock are issued and outstanding, and we have no present plans for the issuance thereof. Our board of directors has the authority, without action by our stockholders, to designate and issue preferred stock in one or more series. Our board of directors may also designate the rights, preferences, and privileges of each series of preferred stock, any or all of which may be greater than the rights of the common stock. It is not possible to state the actual effect of the issuance of any shares of preferred stock on the rights of holders of the common stock until the board of directors determines the specific rights of the holders of the preferred stock. However, these effects might include:

·  restricting dividends on the common stock;
·  diluting the voting power of the common stock;
·  impairing the liquidation rights of the common stock; and
·  delaying or preventing a change in control without further action by the stockholders

Warrants

Class A Warrants

Rights to Purchase Shares of Common Stock.  There are Class A Warrants issued and outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 1,826,250 shares of common stock.  Each Class A Warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase from one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.50 per share.  Each Class A Warrant is exercisable at any time on or before December 31, 2011.

-13-

Call.  Each Class A Warrant is redeemable by us if the our common stock trades at $0.75 or more for a period of at least twenty of the last thirty trading days at any time during the term of the Class A Warrant.  The redemption price is $0.01 per share of common stock.

Exercise.  The Class A Warrants are immediately exercisable.  The holder of a Class A Warrant may exercise such warrant by surrendering the warrant exercise form properly completed and executed, together with payment of the exercise price to the Company.  The exercise price will be payable in cash, certified check or wire transfer of funds.  If the Class A Warrant is exercised only in part, then, unless the warrant expired, the Company shall, at its expense, deliver a new warrant representing the right to purchase the remaining shares of common stock.

Adjustments.  The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the Class A Warrant, are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including stock dividends, reclassifications, reorganizations, consolidations, and mergers.

Class B Warrants

Rights to Purchase Shares of Common Stock.  There are Class B Warrants issued and outstanding to purchase an aggregate of 913,125 shares of common stock.  Each Class B Warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $0.75 per share. Each Class B Warrant is exercisable at any time on or before December 31, 2011.

Call.  Each Class B Warrant is redeemable by us if the our common stock trades at $1.00 or more for a period of at least twenty of the last thirty trading days at any time during the term of the Class B Warrant.  The redemption price is $0.01 per share of common stock.

Exercise.  The Class B Warrants are immediately exercisable.  The holder of a Class B Warrant may exercise such warrant by surrendering the warrant exercise form properly completed and executed, together with payment of the exercise price to the Company.  The exercise price will be payable in cash, certified check or wire transfer of funds.  If the Class B Warrant is exercised only in part, then, unless the warrant expired, the Company shall, at its expense, deliver a new warrant representing the right to purchase the remaining shares of common stock.

Adjustments.  The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the Class B Warrant, are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including stock dividends, reclassifications, reorganizations, consolidations, and mergers.

Other Warrants

In November 2010, the Company entered into a 24 month institutional public relations retainer agreement with Sunrise Securities Corp. (“SSC”) pursuant to which it was issued five-year options, terminating on November 1, 2015, to purchase 250,000 shares of common stock at $1.60 per share and 250,000 shares of common stock at $5.00 per share.  The number of shares and exercise price per share subject to the option shall be adjusted in the case of any dividend, stock split or other recapitalization or reorganization of the Company so that the option shall not be diminished or diluted.

January 2011 Warrants

Rights to Purchase Shares of Common Stock.  In January 2011, we issued warrants to purchase an aggregate of 969,000 shares of common stock (which includes warrants to purchase 169,000 shares of common stock issued to registered broker dealers as commissions, each of which have identical terms to the investor warrants).  Each warrant entitles the registered holder to purchase one share of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share, on or prior to January 25, 2016.

Call.  These warrants are not callable by the Company.

-14-

Exercise.  The warrants are immediately exercisable.  The holder of a warrant may exercise such warrant by surrendering the warrant exercise form properly completed and executed, together with payment of the exercise price to the Company.  The exercise price will be payable in cash, Additionally, in the event that the Company fails to maintain an effective registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock underlying the January 2011 Warrants, commencing six months after the issuance date and for the duration of  the term of the warrants, the holders have the right to exercise such warrants on a cashless basis.

Adjustments.  The exercise price and the number of shares of common stock purchasable upon exercise of the warrant, are subject to adjustment upon the occurrence of certain events, including stock dividends, reclassifications, reorganizations, consolidations, and mergers.mineralogical expertise.
 
Registration Rights.

With respect to the private placement between October 2009 and October of 2,920,000 shares of common stock (giving effect to the exercise of Class A Warrants to purchase 437,500 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants to purchase 218,750 shares of common stock), as well as 1,826,250 shares of common stock currently exercisable underlying the Class A Warrants and 913,125 shares of common stock currently exercisable underlying the Class B Warrants, the Company has agreed to register the resale of these 5,659,375 shares under the Securities Act.  Under the registration rights agreements, the Company is required to file a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying the warrants by February 9, 2011, and the registration is required to be deemed effective by th e SEC on or before the 150th calendar day after the filing of such registration statement.  In the event these milestones are not met by the Company, the Company is obligated to issue, as liquidated damages on a pro-rata basis to these investors, approximately 290,000 shares for each month, or pro-rated for a period less than one month, the registration is late up to a maximum of approximately 1,450,000 shares.  
We have also granted demand registration rights with respect to the 800,000 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock issued in our January 2011 private placement.  If a registration statement is not filed with the SEC on or before February 9, 2011, or if such registration statement deemed effective by the SEC on or before the 150th calendar day after the filing of the registration statement, the Company has agreed to make pro rata payments to the investors, as liquidated damages, number of shares of Company common stock equal to ten percent of the shares of common stock purchased by the respective investors and issued upon the exercise of the five year warrants for each 30-day period or pro rat a for any portion thereof for which no registration statement has been filed or has not been declared effective by the SEC, as the case may be, provided that such amount shall not exceed five times the liquidated damages amount.  There can be no assurance that the Company’s registration statement will be effective within 150 days after February 9, 2011.

Additionally, pursuant the Company has agreed to register the resale of the 500,000 shares of common stock underlying the options issued to SSC pursuant to the public relations agreement, and the 169,000 shares of common stock underlying warrants issued to registered broker dealers in January 2011 as payment of commissions in connection with the sale of the Company’s securities.  No liquidated damage provisions exist with respect to these registration rights.

Indemnification

As permitted by Nevada law, our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, provide that we will indemnify its directors and officers against expenses and liabilities as they are incurred to defend, settle, or satisfy any civil or criminal action brought against them on account of their being or having been Company directors or officers unless, in any such action, they are adjudged to have acted with gross negligence or willful misconduct.  Insofar as indemnification for liabilities arising under the Securities Act may be permitted to directors, officers or persons controlling the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, the Company has been informed that, in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission, such indemnification is against public policy as expresse d in the Securities Act and is, therefore, unenforceable.

-15-

Transfer Agent

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Securities Transfer Corporation whose address is 2591 Dallas Parkway, Suite 102, Frisco, Texas 75034.

ItemITEM 1A. Risk FactorsRISK FACTORS

You
Investment in our Company has a high degree of risk. Before you invest you should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed and the value of our stock could go down. This means you could lose all or a part of your investment.

Risk Related to Our Business

We have a history of losses and will require additional financing to fund exploration and, if warranted, development and production of our properties.  Failure to obtain additional financing could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operation and could cast uncertainty on our ability to continue as a going concern.
We had no revenues during the risks described below, togetherfiscal year ended August 31, 2011.  For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, our net loss was approximately $7,020,000. Our accumulated deficit at August 31, 2011 was approximately $8,443,000. At August 31, 2011, our cash position was approximately $16,886,000 and our working capital position was approximately $16,344,000.  We have not commenced commercial production on any of our mineral properties. We have no revenues from operations and anticipate we will have no operating revenues until we place one or more of our properties into production. All of our properties are in the exploration stage.

We will need to raise additional funding to implement our business strategy.  Our management believes that based on our current working capital position, we will be able to continue operations through the end of calendar year 2012 without raising additional capital, either through debt or equity financing.  Over the next twelve months, we plan to spend over $8,800,000 for exploration at our Round Top project, which includes expenditures for, among other things, drilling of samples, metallurgical testing, scoping studies, permitting and compliance costs associated with allstate governmental agencies and appropriate staff and consulting expenses.  The timing of these expenditures is dependent upon a number of factors, including the availability of drilling contractors. We estimate that general and administrative expenses for the next twelve months will be approximately $1,600,000 to include payroll, professional services, travel, and other information containedexpenses necessary to conduct our operations.

We currently do not have sufficient funds to fully complete exploration and development work on any of our properties, which means that we will be required to raise additional capital, enter into joint venture relationships or find alternative means to finance placing one or more of our properties into commercial production, if warranted. Failure to obtain sufficient financing may result in this Annual Reportthe delay or indefinite postponement of exploration and development or production on one or more of our properties and any properties we may acquire in evaluatingthe future or even a loss of property interests. This includes our leases over claims covering the principal deposits on our properties, which may expire unless we expend minimum levels of expenditures over the terms of such leases. We cannot be certain that additional capital or other types of financing will be available if needed or that, if available, the terms of such financing will be favorable or acceptable to us. Our ability to arrange additional financing in the future will depend, in part, on the prevailing capital market conditions as well as our business performance.

The most likely source of future financing presently available to us is through the sale of our securities. Any sale of common shares will result in dilution of equity ownership to existing shareholders. This means that if we sell common shares, more common shares will be outstanding and each existing shareholder will own a smaller percentage of the shares then outstanding.  Alternatively, we may rely on debt financing and assume debt obligations that require us to make substantial interest and capital payments.  Also, we may issue or grant warrants or options in the future pursuant to which additional common shares may be issued. Exercise of such warrants or options will result in dilution of equity ownership to our existing shareholders.
-13-

We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and prospects. The risksproperties.
Any investment in the Company should be considered a high-risk investment because investors will be placing funds at risk in an early stage business with unforeseen costs, expenses, competition, a history of operating losses and uncertainties described belowother problems to which start-up ventures are often subject. Investors should not invest in the only ones we face.  If anyCompany unless they can afford to lose their entire investment.  Your investment must be considered in light of the following risks, expenses, and uncertainties occurdifficulties encountered in establishing a new business in a highly competitive and mature industry.  Our operating history has been restricted to the acquisition and sampling of our Round Top project and this does not provide a meaningful basis for an evaluation of our Round Top project.  Other than through conventional and typical exploration methods and procedures, we have no additional way to evaluate the likelihood of whether our Round Top project or our other mineral properties contain commercial quantities of mineral reserves or, if they may adversely affect our business, operating results or financial condition.  Additional risks and uncertainties, other than those we describe below,do, that are not presently known to us orthey will be operated successfully.  We anticipate that we may currently believewill continue to incur operating costs without realizing any revenues during the period that we are immaterial, may also impairexploring our business operations.  You should refer to the other information contained in this Annual Report, including the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto of our company, before deciding to invest in our common stock.

Risk Associated with Our Exploration and Mining Businessproperties.

All of our properties are in the exploration stage. There is no assurance that we can establish the existence of any mineral resourcereserve on any of ourthese properties in commercially exploitable quantities. Until we can do so, we cannot earn any revenues from these properties, and our business could fail.

Despite mineral exploration work on certain of our mineral properties, weWe have not established that any of themour properties contain any mineral reserve, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to do so.  The probability of an individual prospect ever having a mineral reserve that meets the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission is extremely remote; in all probability our mineral resource property does not contain any mineral reserve and any funds that we spend on exploration will probably be lost.remote. Even if we do eventually discover a mineral reserve on one or more of our properties, there can be no assurance that they can be developed into producing mines and extract those resources.mines. Both mineral exploration and development involve a high degree of risk and few properties, which are explored, are ultimately de velopeddeveloped into producing mines.

The commercial viability of an established mineral deposit will depend on a number of factors including, by way of example, the size, grade and other attributes of the mineral deposit, the proximity of the resourcedeposit to infrastructure such as a smelter, roads and a point for shipping, government regulation and market prices. Most of these factors will be beyond our control, and any of them could increase costs and make extraction of any identified mineral resourcedeposit unprofitable.

Even if commercial viability of a mineral deposit is established, it may take several years in the initial phases of drilling until production is possible, during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves through drilling and bulk sampling, to determine the optimal metallurgical process to extract the metals from the ore and, in the case of new properties, to construct mining and processing facilities. Because of these uncertainties, no assurance can be given that our exploration programs will result in the establishment or expansion of resourcesa mineral deposit or reserves.

We have no history of producing metals from our mineral properties.

We have no history of producing metals from any of our properties. Our properties are all exploration stage properties in various stages of exploration and evaluation. Our Round Top project is an early exploration stage project, and our New Mexico properties are each early stage exploration projects that management does not consider material to our operations. Advancing properties from exploration into the development stage requires significant capital and time, and successful commercial production from a property, if any, will be subject to completing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of the mine, processing plants, roads, and other related works and infrastructure. As a result, we are subject to all of the risks associated with developing and establishing new mining operations and business enterprises including:

·  completion of feasibility studies to verify reserves and commercial viability, including the ability to find sufficient REE or gold reserves to support a commercial mining operation;

-14-

·  the timing and cost, which can be considerable, of further exploration, preparing feasibility studies, permitting and construction of infrastructure, mining and processing facilities;

·  the availability and costs of drill equipment, exploration personnel, skilled labor and mining and processing equipment, if required;

·  the availability and cost of appropriate smelting and/or refining arrangements, if required, and securing a commercially viable sales outlet for our products;

·  compliance with environmental and other governmental approval and permit requirements;

·  the availability of funds to finance exploration, development and construction activities, as warranted;

·  potential opposition from non-governmental organizations, environmental groups, local groups or local inhabitants which may delay or prevent development activities;

·  potential increases in exploration, construction and operating costs due to changes in the cost of fuel, power, materials and supplies; and

·  potential shortages of mineral processing, construction and other facilities related supplies.

The costs, timing and complexities of exploration, development and construction activities may be increased by the location of our properties and demand by other mineral exploration and mining companies. It is common in exploration programs to experience unexpected problems and delays during drill programs and, if warranted, development, construction and mine start-up. Accordingly, our activities may not result in profitable mining operations and we may not succeed in establishing mining operations or profitably producing metals at any of our properties.

If we establish the existence of a mineral resourcereserve on any of our exploration properties in a commercially exploitable quantity, we will require additional capital in order to develop the property into a producing mine. If weadditional capital cannot raise this additional capital,be raised, we will not be able to exploit the resource,reserve, and our business could fail.

If we do discover mineral resourcesreserves in commercially exploitable quantities on any of our properties, we will be required to expend substantial sums of money to establish the extent of the resource,reserve, develop processes to extract itthe minerals and develop extraction and processing facilities and infrastructure. We do not have adequate capital to develop necessary facilities and infrastructure and will need to raise additional funds.  Although we may derive substantial benefits from the discovery of a major mineral deposit, there can be no assurance that such a resourcedeposit will be large enough to justify commercial operations, nor can there be any assurance that we will be able to raise the funds required for development on a timely basis. If we cannot raise the necessary capital or complete the necessary facilities and infrastructure, our business m aymay fail.

-16-

Our exploration activities may not be commercially successful.

WhileOur long-term success depends on our ability to identify mineral deposits on our existing properties and other properties we believe there are positive indicatorsmay acquire, if any, that ourwe can then develop into commercially viable mining operations.  Our belief that the properties contain commercially exploitable minerals such belief has beenis based solely on preliminary tests that we have conducted and data provided by third parties, including the data published in various third party reports, including but not limited to the Round Top Report.GSA, Geological Society of America, Special Paper 246, 1990.  There can be no assurance that the tests and data upon which we have relied isare correct or accurate.  Moreover, mineral exploration is highly speculative in nature, involves many risks and is frequently non-productive.  Unusual or unexpected geologic formations and the inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment or labor are risks involved in the conduct of exploration programs.  The success of mineral exploration and development is determined in part by the following factors:

·  the identification of potential mineralization based on analysis;
-15-

·  the availability of exploration permits;
·  the quality of our management and our geological and technical expertise; and
·  the capital available for exploration.

Substantial expenditures and time are required to establish existing proven and probable reserves through drilling and analysis, to develop metallurgical processes to extract metal, and to develop the mining and processing facilities and infrastructure at any site chosen for mining.  Whether a mineral deposit will be commercially viable depends on a number of factors, which include, without limitation, the particular attributes of the deposit, such as size, grade and proximity to infrastructure; metal prices, which fluctuate widely; and government regulations, including, without limitation, regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, land tenure, land use, allowable production, importing and exporting of minerals and environmental protection.  Any one or a combination of these factors may result in us not receiving an adequate return on our investment capital.  The decision to abandon a project may have an adverse effect on the market value of our securities and our ability to raise future financing.
Increased costs could affect our financial condition.

There mayWe anticipate that project costs will frequently be challengessubject to variation from one year to the titlenext due to a number of factors, such as changing ore grade, metallurgy and revisions to mine plans, if any, in response to the physical shape and location of the ore body. In addition, costs are affected by the price of commodities such as fuel, rubber, and electricity. Such commodities are at times subject to volatile price movements, including increases that could make production at certain operations less profitable. A material increase in costs at any significant location could have a significant effect on our mineral properties.profitability.

A shortage of equipment and supplies could adversely affect our ability to operate our business.

We are dependent on various supplies and equipment to carry out our mining exploration and, if warranted, development operations. The Company will acquire mostshortage of its properties by unpatented claims or by lease from those owning the property.  The lease of our Round Top property was issued by the State of Texas.  The validity of title to many types of natural resource property depends upon numerous circumstancessuch supplies, equipment and factual matters (many of which are not discoverable of record or by other readily available means) and is subject to many uncertainties of existing law and its application.  We cannot assure you that the validity of our titles to our properties will be upheld or that third parties will not otherwise invalidate those rights. In the event the validity of our titles are not upheld, such an event wouldparts could have a material adverse effect on us.our ability to carry out our operations and therefore limit or increase the cost of production.

Mining and mineral exploration is inherently dangerous and subject to conditions or events beyond our control, which could have a material adverse effect on our business and plans.

Mining and mineral exploration involves various types of risks and hazards, including:

·  environmental hazards;
·  power outages;
·  metallurgical and other processing problems;
·  unusual or unexpected geological formations;
·  personal injury, flooding, fire, explosions, cave-ins, landslides and rock-bursts;
·  inability to obtain suitable or adequate machinery, equipment, or labor;
·  metals losses;
·  fluctuations in exploration, development and production costs;
·  labor disputes;
·  unanticipated variations in grade;
·  mechanical equipment failure; and
·  periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions.
These risks could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties, production facilities or other properties, personal injury, environmental damage, delays in mining, increased production costs, monetary losses and possible legal liability. We may not be able to obtain insurance to cover these risks at economically feasible premiums. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, may be prohibitively expensive. We may suffer a material adverse effect on our business if we incur losses related to any significant events that are not covered by our insurance policies.

-16-

The figures for our mineralization are estimates based on interpretation and assumptions and may yield less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently estimated.

Unless otherwise indicated, mineralization figures presented in this Annual Report and in our filings with securities regulatory authorities, press releases and other public statements that may be made from time to time are based upon estimates made by independent geologists and our internal geologists.  When making determinations about whether to advance any of our projects to development, we must rely upon such estimated calculations as to the mineral reserves and grades of mineralization on our properties.  Until ore is actually mined and processed, mineral reserves and grades of mineralization must be considered as estimates only.

Estimates can be imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable. We cannot assure you that:

·  these interpretations and inferences will be accurate;
·  mineralization estimates will be accurate; or
·  this mineralization can be mined or processed profitably.

Any material changes in mineralization estimates and grades of mineralization will affect the economic viability of placing a property into production and a property's return on capital.

Because feasibility studies have not been completed on any of our properties and we have not commenced actual production, mineralization estimates for our properties may require adjustments or downward revisions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that indicated by our feasibility studies and drill results. Minerals recovered in small scale tests may not be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site conditions or in production scale.

The mineralization estimates contained in this Annual Report have been determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market prices for rare earth minerals may render portions of our mineralization estimates uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization or adversely affect the commercial viability determinations we reach. Any material reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of our ability to extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on our share price and the value of our properties.

Our operations contain significant uninsured risks which could negatively impact future profitability as we maintain no insurance against our operations.

Our exploration of our mineral properties contains certain risks, including unexpected or unusual operating conditions including rock bursts, cave-ins, flooding, fire and earthquakes.  It is not always possible to insure against these risks. Should events such as these arise, they could reduce or eliminate our assets and shareholder equity as well as result in increased costs and a decline in the value of our securities.  We expect to maintain only general liability and director and officer insurance but no insurance against our properties or operations.  We may decide to take out this insurance in the future if it is available at economically viable rates.

Mineral operations are subject to applicable law and government regulations. Even if we discover a mineral resource in a commercially exploitable quantity, these laws and regulationsmarket forces outside of our control which could restrict or prohibit the exploitation of that mineral resource. If we cannot exploit any mineral resource that we might discover onnegatively impact our properties, our business may fail.operations.

Both mineral explorationThe marketability of minerals is affected by numerous factors beyond our control including market fluctuations, government regulations relating to prices, taxes, royalties, allowable production, imports, exports and extraction require permits from various foreign, federal, state, provincialsupply and local governmental authorities and are governed by laws and regulations, including those with respect to prospecting, mine development, mineral production, transport, export, taxation, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters.  

Companies such as ours that engage in exploration activities often experience increaseddemand.  One or more of these risk elements could have an impact on the costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. Issuance of permits for our activities is subject to the discretion of government authorities, and we may be unable to obtain or maintain such permits.  Permits required for future exploration or development may not be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain any of the permits required for the continued exploration or development of our mineral properties or foroperations and if significant enough, reduce the construction and operationprofitability of a mine on our properties at economically viable costs. If we cannot accomplish these objectives, our business could face dif ficulty and/or fail.operations.

 
-17-

 
We believe that we are in compliance with all material laws and regulations that currently apply to our activities but there can be no assurance that we can continue to do so. Current laws and regulations could be amended and we might not be able to comply with them, as amended. Further, there can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain all permits necessary for our future operations, or that we will be able to obtain them on reasonable terms. To the extent such approvals are required and are not obtained, we may be delayed or prohibited from proceeding with planned exploration or development of our mineral properties.

Environmental hazards unknown to us, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties, may exist on the properties in which we hold an interest.  It is possible that our properties could be located on or near the site of a Federal Superfund cleanup project. Although we will endeavor to avoid such sites, it is possible that environmental cleanup or other environmental restoration procedures could remain to be completed or mandated by law, causing unpredictable and unexpected liabilities to arise.  At the date of this Annual Report, we are not aware of any environmental issues or litigation relating to any of our current or former properties.

Competition in the mining industry is intense, and we have limited financial and personnel resources with which to compete.

Competition in the mining industry for desirable properties, investment capital, equipment and personnel is intense. Numerous companies headquartered in the United States, Canada and elsewhere throughout the world compete for properties on a global basis. We are currently an insignificant participant in the mining industry due to our limited financial and personnel resources. We may be unable to attract the necessary investment capital or a joint venture partner to fully develop our mineral properties, be unable to acquire other desirable properties, be unable to attract and hire necessary personnel, or be unable to purchase necessary equipment.

We may be adversely affected by fluctuations in demand for, and prices of, rare earth products.

We expect to derive revenues, if any, from the sale of rare earth and related minerals.  Changes in demand for, and the market price of, these minerals could significantly affect our profitability. The value and price of our common stock and our financial results may be significantly and adversely affected by declines in the prices of rare earth minerals and products. Rare earth minerals and product prices may fluctuate and are affected by numerous factors beyond our control such as interest rates, exchange rates, inflation or deflation, fluctuation in the relative value of the U.S. dollar against foreign currencies on the world market, global and regional supply and demand for rare earth minerals and products, and the political and economic conditions of countries that produce rare earth minerals and products.
 
A prolonged or significant economic contraction in the United States or worldwide could put further downward pressure on market prices of rare earth minerals and products. Protracted periods of low prices for rare earth minerals and products could significantly reduce revenues and the availability of required development funds in the future. This could cause substantial reductions to, or a suspension of, REO production operations, impair asset values and if reserves are established on our prospects, reduce our proven and probable rare earth ore reserves.
 
In contrast, extended periods of high commodity prices may create economic dislocations that may be destabilizing to rare earth minerals supply and demand and ultimately to the broader markets. Periods of high rare earth mineral market prices generally are beneficial to our financial performance. However, strong rare earth mineral prices also create economic pressure to identify or create alternate technologies that ultimately could depress future long-term demand for rare earth minerals and products, and at the same time may incentivize development of otherwise marginal mining properties.

Permitting, licensing and approval processes are required for our operations and obtaining and maintaining these permits and licenses is subject to conditions which we may be unable to achieve.

Both mineral exploration and extraction require permits from various foreign, federal, state, provincial and local governmental authorities and are governed by laws and regulations, including those with respect to prospecting, mine development, mineral production, transport, export, taxation, labor standards, occupational health, waste disposal, toxic substances, land use, environmental protection, mine safety and other matters. Permits known to be required are (i) an operating plan for the conduct of exploration and development approved by the Texas General Land Office, (ii) an operating plan for production approved by the Texas General Land Office, (iii) various reporting to and approval by the Texas Railroad Commission regarding drilling and plugging of drill holes, and (v) reporting to and compliance with regulations of the Texas Commission of Environmental Quality.  If we recover uranium from our mineral prospects, we will be required to obtain a source material license from the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission.  We may also be subject to the reporting requirements and regulations of the Texas Dept. of Health.

Such licenses and permits are subject to changes in regulations and changes in various operating circumstances.  Companies such as ours that engage in exploration activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. Issuance of permits for our activities is subject to the discretion of government authorities, and we may be unable to obtain or maintain such permits.  Permits required for future exploration or development may not be obtainable on reasonable terms or on a timely basis.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain or maintain any of the permits required for the continued exploration or development of our mineral properties or for the construction and operation of a mine on our properties at economically viable costs. If we cannot accomplish these objectives, our business could face difficulty and/or fail.

We are subject to significant governmental regulations, which affect our operations and costs of conducting our business.

Current and future operations are and will be governed by laws and regulations, including:

·  laws and regulations governing mineral concession acquisition, prospecting, development, mining and production;
 
-18-

 
The nature of mineral exploration and production activities involves a high degree of risk and the possibility of uninsured losses.

The business of exploring for rare earth minerals and beryllium involves a high degree of risk. Few properties are ultimately developed into producing mines. Whether a mineral deposit can be commercially viable depends upon a number of factors, including the particular attributes of the deposit, including size, grade and proximity to infrastructure, metal prices, which can be highly variable, and government regulation, including environmental and reclamation obligations. These factors are not within our control. Uncertainties as to the metallurgical amenability of any minerals discovered may not warrant the mining of these minerals on the basis of available technology. Our operations are subject to all of the operating hazards and risks normally incident to exploring for and developing mineral properties, such as, but not limited to:

·  laws and regulations related to exports, taxes and fees;
·  encountering unusual or unexpected formations;labor standards and regulations related to occupational health and mine safety;
·  environmental pollution;
·  personal injury, floodingstandards and landslides;
·  variations in grades of minerals;
·  labor disputes;regulations related to waste disposal, toxic substances, land use and environmental protection; and
·  a decline in the price of rare earth elements or beryllium.other matters.

Companies engaged in exploration activities often experience increased costs and delays in production and other schedules as a result of the need to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits. Failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permits may result in enforcement actions, including the forfeiture of claims, orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities requiring operations to cease or be curtailed, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or costly remedial actions. We currently have no insurancemay be required to guard against any of these risks. If we determine that capitalized costs associated with anycompensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of our mineral interests are not likely to be recovered, we would incur a write-down on our investment inexploration activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of such property interests.  Alllaws, regulations and permits.

Existing and possible future laws, regulations and permits governing operations and activities of these factors may result in losses in relation to amounts spent which are not recoverable.  The payment of any liabilities that arise from any such occurrence wouldexploration companies, or more stringent implementation, could have a material adverse impact on our Company.business and cause increases in capital expenditures or require abandonment or delays in exploration.

Rare earthLegislation has been proposed that would significantly affect the mining industry.

Members of the U.S. Congress have repeatedly introduced bills which would supplant or alter the provisions of the Mining Law of 1872. If enacted, such legislation could change the cost of holding unpatented mining claims and beryllium mining presents potential health risks.  Payment of any liabilities that arise from these health risks may adverselycould significantly impact our Company.ability to develop mineralized material on unpatented mining claims. Such bills have proposed, among other things, to either eliminate or greatly limit the right to a mineral patent and to impose a federal royalty on production from unpatented mining claims. Although we cannot predict what legislated royalties might be, the enactment of these proposed bills could adversely affect the potential for development of unpatented mining claims and the economics of existing operating mines on federal unpatented mining claims. Passage of such legislation could adversely affect our financial performance.

Complying with healthRegulations and safety standards will require additional expenditure on testing and the installation of safety equipment. Moreover, inhalation of certain minerals, such as beryllium can result in specific potential health risks ranging from acute pneumonitis, tracheobronchitis, and chronic beryllium disease to an increased risk of cancer.  Symptoms of these diseases may take years to manifest.  Failure to comply with health and safety standardspending legislation governing issues involving climate change could result in statutory penalties and civil liability.  We do not currently maintain any insurance coverage against these health risks. The payment of any liabilities that arise from any such occurrences wouldincreased operating costs, which could have a material adverse impacteffect on our Company.business.

A number of governments or governmental bodies have introduced or are contemplating regulatory changes in response to various climate change interest groups and the potential impact of climate change. Legislation and increased regulation regarding climate change could impose significant costs on us, our venture partners and our suppliers, including costs related to increased energy requirements, capital equipment, environmental monitoring and reporting and other costs to comply with such regulations. Any adopted future climate change regulations could also negatively impact our ability to compete with companies situated in areas not subject to such limitations. Given the emotion, political significance and uncertainty around the impact of climate change and how it should be dealt with, we cannot predict how legislation and regulation will affect our financial condition, operating performance and ability to compete. Furthermore, even without such regulation, increased awareness and any adverse publicity in the global marketplace about potential impacts on climate change by us or other companies in our industry could harm our reputation. The potential physical impacts of climate change on our operations are highly uncertain, and would be particular to the geographic circumstances in areas in which we operate. These may include changes in rainfall and storm patterns and intensities, water shortages, changing sea levels and changing temperatures. These impacts may adversely impact the cost, production and financial performance of our operations.

Our exploration and development activities are subject to environmental risks, which could expose us to significant liability and delay, suspension or termination of our operations.

The exploration, possible future development and production phases of our business will be subject to federal, state and local environmental regulation. These regulations mandate, among other things, the maintenance of air and water quality standards and land reclamation. They also set out limitations on the generation, transportation, storage and disposal of solid and hazardous waste. Environmental legislation is evolving in a manner which will require stricter standards and enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments, and a heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their officers, directors and employees. Future changes in environmental regulations, if any, may adversely affect our operations. If we fail to comply with any of the applicable environmental laws, r egulationsregulations or permit requirements, we could face regulatory or judicial sanctions. Penalties imposed by either the courts or administrative bodies could delay or stop our operations or require a considerable capital expenditure. Although we intend to comply with all environmental laws and permitting obligations in conducting our business, there is a possibility that those opposed to exploration and mining will attempt to interfere with our operations, whether by legal process, regulatory process or otherwise.

-19-

Environmental hazards unknown to us, which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the properties, may exist on the properties in which we hold an interest.  It is possible that our properties could be located on or near the site of a Federal Superfund cleanup project. Although we will endeavor to avoid such sites, it is possible that environmental cleanup or other environmental restoration procedures could remain to be completed or mandated by law, causing unpredictable and unexpected liabilities to arise.

U.S. Federal Laws

The Comprehensive Environmental, Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), and comparable state statutes, impose strict, joint and several liability on current and former owners and operators of sites and on persons who disposed of or arranged for the disposal of hazardous substances found at such sites. It is not uncommon for the government to file claims requiring cleanup actions, demands for reimbursement for government-incurred cleanup costs, or natural resource damages, or for neighboring landowners and other third parties to file claims for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by hazardous substances released into the environment. The Federal Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), and comparable state statutes, govern the disposal of solid waste and hazardous waste and authorize the imposition of substantial fines and penalties for noncompliance, as well as requirements for corrective actions. CERCLA, RCRA and comparable state statutes can impose liability for clean-up of sites and disposal of substances found on exploration, mining and processing sites long after activities on such sites have been completed.

The Clean Air Act, as amended, restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources, including mining and processing activities. Our mining operations may produce air emissions, including fugitive dust and other air pollutants from stationary equipment, storage facilities and the use of mobile sources such as trucks and heavy construction equipment, which are subject to review, monitoring and/or control requirements under the Clean Air Act and state air quality laws. New facilities may be required to obtain permits before work can begin, and existing facilities may be required to incur capital costs in order to remain in compliance. In addition, permitting rules may impose limitations on our production levels or result in additional capital expenditures in order to comply with the rules.

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to integrate environmental considerations into their decision-making processes by evaluating the environmental impacts of their proposed actions, including issuance of permits to mining facilities, and assessing alternatives to those actions. If a proposed action could significantly affect the environment, the agency must prepare a detailed statement known as an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS). The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, other federal agencies, and any interested third parties will review and comment on the scoping of the EIS and the adequacy of and findings set forth in the draft and final EIS. This process can cause delays in issuance of required permits or result in changes to a project to mitigate its potential environmental impacts, which can in turn impact the economic feasibility of a proposed project.

The Clean Water Act (CWA), and comparable state statutes, imposes restrictions and controls on the discharge of pollutants into waters of the United States. The discharge of pollutants into regulated waters is prohibited, except in accordance with the terms of a permit issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) or an analogous state agency. The CWA regulates storm water mining facilities and requires a storm water discharge permit for certain activities. Such a permit requires the regulated facility to monitor and sample storm water run-off from its operations. The CWA and regulations implemented thereunder also prohibit discharges of dredged and fill material in wetlands and other waters of the United States unless authorized by an appropriately issued permit. The CWA and comparable state statutes provide for civil, criminal and administrative penalties for unauthorized discharges of pollutants and impose liability on parties responsible for those discharges for the costs of cleaning up any environmental damage caused by the release and for natural resource damages resulting from the release.

-20-

The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) and the Underground Injection Control (UIC) program promulgated thereunder, regulate the drilling and operation of subsurface injection wells. EPA directly administers the UIC program in some states and in others the responsibility for the program has been delegated to the state. The program requires that a permit be obtained before drilling a disposal or injection well. Violation of these regulations and/or contamination of groundwater by mining related activities may result in fines, penalties, and remediation costs, among other sanctions and liabilities under the SWDA and state laws. In addition, third party claims may be filed by landowners and other parties claiming damages for alternative water supplies, property damages, and bodily injury.

We could be subject to environmental lawsuits.

Neighboring landowners and other third parties could file claims based on environmental statutes and common law for personal injury and property damage allegedly caused by the release of hazardous substances or other waste material into the environment on or around our properties.  There can be no assurance that our defense of such claims will be successful.  A successful claim against us could have an adverse effect on our business prospects, financial condition and results of operation.

Land reclamation requirements for our properties may be burdensome and expensive.

Although variable depending on location and the governing authority, land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance.

Reclamation may include requirements to:

·  control dispersion of potentially deleterious effluents;
·  treat ground and surface water to drinking water standards; and
·  reasonably re-establish pre-disturbance land forms and vegetation.

In order to carry out reclamation obligations imposed on us in connection with our potential development activities, we must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. We plan to set up a provision for our reclamation obligations on our properties, as appropriate, but this provision may not be adequate. If we are required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, our financial position could be adversely affected.

Rare earth and beryllium mining presents potential health risks.  Payment of any liabilities that arise from these health risks may adversely impact our Company.

Complying with health and safety standards will require additional expenditure on testing and the installation of safety equipment. Moreover, inhalation of certain minerals, such as beryllium can result in specific potential health risks ranging from acute pneumonitis, tracheobronchitis, and chronic beryllium disease to an increased risk of cancer.  Symptoms of these diseases may take years to manifest.  Failure to comply with health and safety standards could result in statutory penalties and civil liability.  We do not currently maintain any insurance coverage against these health risks. The payment of any liabilities that arise from any such occurrences would have a material, adverse impact on our Company.

There may be challenges to the title of our mineral properties.

The Company will acquire most of its properties by unpatented claims or by lease from those owning the property.  The lease of our Round Top property was issued by the State of Texas.  The validity of title to many types of natural resource property depends upon numerous circumstances and factual matters (many of which are not discoverable of record or by other readily available means) and is subject to many uncertainties of existing law and its application.  We cannot assure you that the validity of our titles to our properties will be upheld or that third parties will not otherwise invalidate those rights. In the event the validity of our titles is not upheld, such an event would have a material adverse effect on us.

 
-19--21-

 
Risks Associated withIncreased competition could adversely affect our Companyability to attract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future.

There can be no assurance the Company will successfully implement its plans.

For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 we had accumulated deficit of $1,422,634.  We expect lossesThe mining industry is intensely competitive. Significant competition exists for the foreseeable future.  Our likelihoodacquisition of success mustproperties producing or capable of producing, REE, gold or other metals. We may be consideredat a competitive disadvantage in light of the problems, expenses, difficulties, complications and delays frequently encountered in connection with the formation of a new business which seeks to obtain funds to finance its operations in a highly competitive environment.  There can be no assurance that we will successfully implement any of its plans in a timely or effective manner or that we will ever be profitable.  In addition, there can be no assurances that we will choose to continue to develop any of our currentacquiring additional mining properties because we intendmust compete with other individuals and companies, many of which have greater financial resources, operational experience and technical capabilities than us. We may also encounter increasing competition from other mining companies in our efforts to considerhire experienced mining professionals. Competition for exploration resources at all levels is currently very intense, particularly affecting the availability of manpower, drill rigs, mining equipment and as appropriate,production equipment. Increased competition could adversely affect our ability to divest ourselves ofattract necessary capital funding or acquire suitable producing properties that may no longer be a strategic fit to our business strategy.

We have a history of losses and expect to incur substantial losses and negative operating cash flowsor prospects for the foreseeable future, and we may never achieve or maintain profitability.

We had no operating revenue during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009.  We are not currently profitable.  We believe that we have sufficient capital to fund operations through calendar year 2011, but we will need to raise additional funding implement our business strategy.  Even if we succeedmineral exploration in developing our prospects, we expect to incur substantial losses for the foreseeable future and may never become profitable. We also expect to continue to incur significant operating and capital expenditures and anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future.

We have a limited operating history on which to base an evaluation of our business and properties.compete with larger, better capitalized competitors in the mining industry.

Any investmentThe mining industry is competitive in us should be considered a high-risk investment because investorsall of its phases, including financing, technical resources, personnel and property acquisition. We will be placing funds at riskrequire significant capital, technical resources, personnel and operational experience to effectively compete in an early stage business with unforeseen costs, expenses, competition, a history of operating losses and other problems to which start-up ventures are often subject. Investors should not invest in us unless they can afford to lose their entire investment.  Your investment must be considered in lightthe mining industry. Because of the risks, expenses,high costs associated with exploration, the expertise required to analyze a project's potential and difficulties encountered in establishingthe capital required to develop a new business inmine, larger companies with significant resources may have a highly competitive advantage over us. We face strong competition from other mining companies, some with greater financial resources, operational experience and mature industry.  Our operating history has been restricted to the acquisition and samplingtechnical capabilities than us. As a result of Round Top and this does not provide a meaningful basis for an evaluation of Round Top.  Other than through conventional and typical exploration methods and procedures,competition, we have no additional way to evaluate the likelihood of whether Round Top or our other mineral properties contains commercial quantities of mineral reserves or, if they do, that they will be operated successfully.  We anticipate that we will continue to incur operating costs without realizing any revenues during the period when we are exploring our properties.

If we cannot raise additional funding, we willmay be unable to implement our business plan.

We do not generate revenue, will be reliant upon raising additional capital on a best efforts basis, and without additional substantial capital, we will not have sufficient financialmaintain or acquire financing, personnel, technical resources to undertake by ourselves all planned development activities relating to Round Top.  As of August 31, 2010, we had nominal cash on hand.  In January 2011, we entered into a series of transactions with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 800,000 shares of our common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $2,000,000.  As additional consideration for the purchase of the shares and warrants, the Company issued to the January 2011 investors options to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at $2.50 per share and 100% warrant coverage through the issuance of warrants to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.   As a result, we believe we have sufficient capital to sustain operations through calendar year 2011, however we will need to raise additional capital to implement our business plan. No assurance can be given that additional financing will be availableor attractive mining properties on terms we consider acceptable to us, or that existing warrants and options will be exercised.  We do not have any commitments for debt or equity financing at this time, nor do we have credit facilities available with financial institutions or other third parties, and investors may lose their all of their investment.all.

-20-

Current economic conditions and capital markets are in a period of disruption and instability which could adversely affect our ability to access the capital markets, and thus adversely affect our business and liquidity.

The current economic conditions and financial crisis have had, and will continue to have, a negative impact on our ability to access the capital markets, and thus have a negative impact on our business and liquidity. The shortage of liquidity and credit combined with substantial losses in worldwide equity markets could lead to an extended worldwide recession. We may face significant challenges if conditions in the capital markets do not improve. Our ability to access the capital markets has been and continues to be severely restricted at a time when we need to access such markets, which could have a negative impact on our business plans. Even if we are able to raise capital, it may not be at a price or on terms that are favorable to us. We cannot predict the occurrence of future financial disruptions or how long the current market con ditionsconditions may continue.

Our resources may not be sufficient to manage our expected growth; failure to properly manage our potential growth would be detrimental to our business.

We may fail to adequately manage our anticipated future growth. Any growth in our operations will place a significant strain on our administrative, financial and operational resources, and increase demands on our management and on our operational and administrative systems, controls and other resources. We cannot assure you that our existing personnel, systems, procedures or controls will be adequate to support our operations in the future or that we will be able to successfully implement appropriate measures consistent with our growth strategy. As part of this growth, we may have to implement new operational and financial systems, procedures and controls to expand, train and manage our employee base, and maintain close coordination among our staff. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to do so, or that if we are able to do so, we will be able to effectively integrate them into our existing staff and systems.

-22-

If we are unable to manage growth effectively, our business, operating results and financial condition could be materially and adversely affected. As with all expanding businesses, the potential exists that growth will occur rapidly. If we are unable to effectively manage this growth, our business and operating results could suffer. Anticipated growth in future operations may place a significant strain on management systems and resources. In addition, the integration of new personnel will continue to result in some disruption to ongoing operations. The ability to effectively manage growth in a rapidly evolving market requires effective planning and management processes. We will need to continue to improve operational, financial and managerial controls, reporting systems and procedures, and will need to continue to expand, train and manage our work force.
We may experience difficulty attracting and retaining qualified management to meet the needs of our anticipated growth, and the failure to manage our growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.

Competition for additional qualified management is intense, and we may be unable to attract and retain additional key personnel, or to attract and retain personnel on terms acceptable to us.  Management personnel are currently limited and they may be unable to manage our expansion successfully and the failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.  We have not entered into non-competition agreements.  As our business is substantially dependent upon the directors, executive officers and consultants, the lack of non-competition agreements poses a significant risk to us in the event such persons were to resign or be terminated from such positions.  Under such circumstances, such persons may provide confidential information and key contacts to our competitors and we may have difficulties in preventing the disclosure of such information.  Such disclosure would have a material adverse effect on our business and operations.

The loss of Daniel E. GorskiMarc LeVier or Anthony Garcia could adversely impact the Company.

The nature of our business, including our ability to continue our exploration and development activities, depends, in large part, on the efforts of Dan Gorski.Marc LeVier and Anthony Garcia.  The loss of Mr. Gorskieither Messrs. LeVier or Garcia could have a material adverse effect on our business.  We do not maintain “key man” life insurance policies on any of our officers or employees.

EffortsOur failure to complytimely file certain periodic reports with recently enacted changes in securities lawsthe SEC poses significant risks to our business, each of which could materially and regulations will increaseadversely affect our costsfinancial condition and require additional management resources, andresults of operations.
We filed a Form 10 on October 30, 2008, pursuant to which we still may fail to comply.

As directed byregistered our common stock under Section 40412(g) of the Sarbanes-OxleySecurities Exchange Act of 2002,1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”).  The Form 10-12G became effective by operation of law 60 days after it was filed.  Subsequent thereto, we did not timely file with the SEC adopted rules requiring public companiesour periodic reports, including our Forms 10-Q for the periods ended November 30, 2008 through November 30, 2010, and our Forms 10-K for the periods ended August 31, 2008, August 31, 2009 and August 31, 2010.  Consequently, we were not compliant with the periodic reporting requirements under the Exchange Act.  Our failure to include a reporttimely file those and possibly future periodic reports with the SEC could subject us to enforcement action by the SEC and shareholder lawsuits.  Any of management on our internal controls over financial reporting in their annual reports on Form 10-K.  These requirements are not presently applicable to us but we will become subject to these requirements subsequent to the date hereof. Ifevents could materially and when these regulations become applicable to us, and if we are unable to conclude that we have effective internal controls over financial reporting or if our independent auditors are unable to provide us with an unqualified report as to the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, investors could lose confidence in the reliability ofadversely affect our financial statements, which could res ult in a decrease in the valuecondition and results of our securities. We have not yet begun a formal process to evaluate our internal controls over financial reporting. Given the status of our efforts, coupled with the fact that guidance from regulatory authorities in the area of internal controls continues to evolve, substantial uncertainty exists regardingoperations and our ability to comply by applicable deadlines.register with the SEC public offerings of our securities for our benefit or the benefit of our security holders.  Additionally, our failure to file our past periodic reports and future periodic reports has resulted in and could result in investors not receiving adequate information regarding the Company with which to make investment decisions.

-21-

Risks Relating to Our Common StockSecurities

The Company’sOur stock price is highly volatile.

The market price of our common stock has fluctuated and may continue to fluctuate.  These fluctuations may be exaggerated since the trading volume of its common stock is volatile, limited, and sporadic.  These fluctuations may or may not be based upon any business or operating results.  Our common stock may experience similar or even more dramatic price and volume fluctuations in the future.

-23-

The market for the common stock is limited, sporadic and volatile.  Any failure to develop or maintain an active trading market could negatively affect the value of our shares and make it difficult or impossible for you to sell your shares.

Our common stock is currently listed for quotation inon the Pink OTCQB market tier of the OTC Markets, Inc.Sheets, a centralized quotation service maintained by OTC Markets, Group, Inc. that collects and publishes market maker quotes for over-the-counter securities. Although our common stock is quoted inon the Pink Sheets,OTCQB, a regular trading market for the securities may not be sustained in the future. Quotes for stocks listed inon the Pink SheetsOTCQB generally are not listed in the financial sections of newspapers and newspapers often devote very little coverage to stocks quoted solely inon the pink sheets.OTCQB. Accordingly, prices for, and coverage of, securities quoted solely inon the Pink SheetsOTCQB may be difficult to obtain. In addition, stocks quoted solely inon the Pink SheetsOTCQB tend to have a limited number of market makers and a larger spread between the bid and ask prices than those listed on an exchange. All of these factors may cause holders of our common stock to be unable to resell their securities at any price. This limited trading also could decrease or eliminate our ability to raise additional funds through issuances of our securities.  There is no market for the warrants and options that are currently issued and outstanding.Warrants.

While we will attempt to have our common stock quoted on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, since the OTC Bulletin Board is a dealer system we will have to seek market-makers to provide quotations for the common stock, and it is possible that no market-maker will want to provide such quotations. Failure to develop or maintain an active trading market could negatively affect the value of our shares and make it difficult for you to sell your shares or recover any part of your investment in us.  Even if an active market for our common stock does develop, the market price of our common stock may be highly volatile.  In addition to the uncertainties relating to our future operating performance and the profitability of our operations, factors such as variations in our interim financial results, or various, as yet unpre dictableunpredictable factors, many of which are beyond our control, may have a negative effect on the market price of our common stock.  Accordingly, there can be no assurance as to the liquidity of any active markets that may develop for our common stock, the ability of holders of our common stock to sell our common stock, or the prices at which holders may be able to sell our common stock.

Should our stock become listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, if we fail to remain current on our reporting requirements, we could be removed from the OTC Bulletin Board which would limit the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.

Companies trading on the Over-The-Counter Bulletin Board, which we are seeking to become, must be reporting issuers under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), and must be current in their reports under Section 13 of the Exchange Act, in order to maintain price quotation privileges on the OTC Bulletin Board. The lack of resources to prepare and file our reports, including the inability to pay our auditor, could result in our failure to remain current on our reporting requirements, which could result in our being removed from the OTC Bulletin Board. As a result, the market liquidity for our securities could be severely adversely affected by limiting the ability of broker-dealers to sell our securities and the ability of stockholders to sell their securities in the secondary market.& #160;  In addition, we may be unable to get re-listed on the OTC Bulletin Board, which may have an adverse material effect on our company.

The sale of substantial shares of our common stock or the issuance of shares upon exercise of our warrants will cause immediate and substantial dilution to our existing stockholders and may depress the market price of our common stock.

In order to provide capital for the operation of our business, we may enter into additional financing arrangements.  These arrangements may involve the issuance of new common stock, preferred stock that is convertible into common stock, debt securities that are convertible into common stock or warrants for the purchase of common stock.  Any of these items could result in a material increase in the number of shares of common stock outstanding which would in turn result in a dilution of the ownership interest of existing common shareholders.  In addition, these new securities could contain provisions, such as priorities on distributions and voting rights, which could affect the value of our existing common stock.

-22-

Additionally,We have approximately 34.6 million shares of common stock outstanding.  In addition to our common stock, we have (i) Class A Warrants that may be exercised into 1,826,2501,418,750 shares of common stock exercisable at $0.50 per share, (ii) Class B Warrants that may be exercised into 913,125740,625 shares of common stock and other options andexercisable at $0.75 per share, (iii) warrants that may be exercised into 7,840,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $2.50 per share, (iv) warrants that may be exercised into 1,469,0001,497,000 shares of common stock at exercise prices ranging from $1.60$2.50 per share, (v) warrants that may be exercised into 250,000 of common stock at $5.00 per share, (vi) warrants that may be exercised into 33,334 shares of common stock at $3.75 per share, and (vii) options that may be exercised into 4,425,000 shares of common stock at $1.85 to $5.00.$4.70 issued to Directors and Officers.  The issuance of shares upon exercise of the Warrantsthese options and warrants may result in additional substantial dilution to the interests of other stockholders and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

A low market price may severely limit the potential market for the Company’sour common stock.

The Company’s common stock is currently trading atAn equity security that trades below a certain price below $5.00 per share subjecting trading in the stockis subject to certain SEC rules requiring additional disclosures by broker-dealers.  These rules generally apply to any non-Nasdaq equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions (a “penny stock”).  Such rules require the delivery, prior to any penny stock transaction, of a disclosure schedule explaining the penny stock market and the risks associated therewith and impose various sales practice requirements on broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to persons other than established customers and institutional or wealthy investors.  For these types of transactions, the broker-dealer must make a special suitability determination for the pu rchaserpurchaser and have received the purchaser's written consent to the transaction prior to the sale.  The broker-dealer also must disclose the commissions payable to the broker-dealer, current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer's presumed control over the market.  Such information must be provided to the customer orally or in writing before or with the written confirmation of trade sent to the customer.

-24-

Monthly statements must be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.  TheIn the event our common stock trades at a price of less than $5.00 per share, the additional burdens imposed upon broker-dealers by such requirements could discourage broker-dealers from effecting transactions in our common stock.

The Company willWe do not currently intend to pay dividends on its common stock.cash dividends.

We have not declared any dividends since incorporation and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stockthat we will do so in the foreseeable future.  Our present policy is to retain all available funds for use in our operations and the expansion of our business.  Payment of future cash dividends, if any, will be at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend on our financial condition, results of operations, contractual restrictions, capital requirements, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant. Accordingly, investors will only see a return on their investment if the value of our securities appreciates.

Control by current shareholders.

The current shareholders have elected the directors and the directors have appointed current executive officers to serve the Company.  The voting power of these shareholders could also discourage others from seeking to acquire control of us through the purchase of our common stock which might depress the price of our common stock.
ITEM 1B.  UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

Not applicable.
ItemITEM 2.  DescriptionDESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY

Executive and Field Offices

Our headquarters are located at 304 Inverness Way South, Suite 365, Englewood, Colorado80112. We also maintain a 12,500 square foot office warehouse in El Paso, Texas to store and process rock samples and a 2,400 square foot satellite office located in Sierra Blanca, Texas.  We believe that these facilities are suitable for our current needs.

Round Top Project

We are currently in the exploration stage and have not established that our Round Top Project contains proven or probable reserves as defined under SEC Guide 7.

Location, Accessibility, Local Resources, and Infrastructure

Round Top Mountain is a small mountain, one of Propertya group of four that comprises the Sierra Blanca Mountains, located in Hudspeth County, Texas approximately eight miles northwest of the town of Sierra Blanca. The Round Top Project is reached by a private, dirt road that turns north off Interstate 10.  The access road is approximately one mile west of the town of Sierra Blanca.

The Round Top Project was initially developed in the late 1980's as a beryllium resource.  Several pieces of equipment were present at the property when the Company acquired the lease.  The previous operators had also built out several roads at the prospect site.  We will continue to build roads at the property site as warranted.

-25-

There exists on the Round Top Project a 1,115 foot, 10 foot by 10 foot decline from the surface into Round Top Mountain. There are steel sets every five feet, in some cases less, and the entire working is lagged with timber. There are “escape holes” at intervals to allow personnel to avoid equipment. The escape holes are all in good operating condition.  There is also a 36 foot steel ventilation line in place that runs for approximately 75 feet into the mountain. There is a 125 hp axial plane ventilation fan in place.  


Location of Round Top Project, Hudspeth County, Texas

Source: Texas Rare Earth Resources, 2011

A descriptionAcquisition and Ownership

In November 2007, Standard Silver purchased the prospecting permits M-108543, M-108545, and M-108546 covering Sections 5, 7, 8, and 18 of Township 7, Block 71, and most of Sections 12 and 13 of Township 7, Block 72, Hudspeth County, Texas. In September 2009 this land position was expanded when the prospecting permits for Sections 3, 4, 9, 10, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 28, 29, 32 and 33 of Township 7, Block 71 were acquired.  In August 2010, Standard Silver entered into a mining lease M-111331 with the Texas General Land Office covering Sections 7 and 18 of Township 7, Block 71 and Section 12 of Block 72, covering approximately 860 acres in Hudspeth County, Texas.

The mining lease issued by the Texas General Land Office gives us the right to explore, produce, develop, mine, extract, mill, remove, and market beryllium, uranium, rare earth elements, all other base and precious metals, industrial minerals and construction materials and all other minerals excluding oil, gas, coal, lignite, sulfur, salt, and potash.  The term of the lease is twenty years so long as minerals are produced in paying quantities.

Under the lease, we will pay the State of Texas a lease bonus of $197,800; $35,000 which was paid upon the execution of the lease, $65,000 which was paid when we submitted our propertiesinitial plan of operations to conduct exploration, and $97,800 of which will be due when we submit a supplemental plan of operations to conduct mining.  Upon the sale of minerals removed from Round Top, we will pay the State of Texas a $500,000 minimum advance royalty.  Thereafter, we will pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from Round Top and six and one quarter percent (6 ¼%) of the market value of all other minerals sold from Round Top.

-26-

If production of paying quantities of minerals has not been obtained on or before August 17, 2011, we may pay the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the term of the lease in an amount equal to $44,718, which was paid as of August 31, 2011.  Thereafter, assuming production of paying quantities has not been obtained, we may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:

  Per Acre Amount  Total Amount 
August 17, 2012 – 2014 $50  $44,718 
August 17, 2015 – 2019 $75  $67,077 
August 17, 2020 – 2024 $150  $134,154 
August 17, 2025 – 2029 $200  $178,873 

Geology and Metallurgy

The Round Top project area lies within the Texas Lineament Zone or Trans-Pecos Trend.  The lineament is a northwest trending structural zone where Laramide thrust faulting followed by basin and range normal faulting were active.  Tertiary igneous activity is also associated with the lineament zone, both intrusive and extrusive.

Locally the project area is characterized by five Tertiary microgranite bodies that intruded Cretaceous sedimentary rocks. The microgranites occur as laccoliths, mushroom-shaped bodies emplaced at relatively shallow depths.  At the current erosional levels,  lacoliths form resistant peaks with relief up to 2,000 feet.  The microgranites are enriched with various metals which may or not be economical to recover.  The rare earth elements are located with-in the intrusive rhyolite body.

Tertiary Diorites which predates the microgranites intruded the cretaceous section.  The diorites occur as sills, five to 100 feet thick and less frequently as dikes and plugs.  Sedimentary rocks exposed in the area are lower and middle cretaceous limestones shales and sandstones.  The limestone, where it is in contact with the microgranites, is the hosts for Beryllium mineralization.

The Round Top Project was initially developed in the late 1980's as a beryllium resource. During the course of the beryllium exploration, approximately 200 drill holes penetrated varying thicknesses of the rhyolite volcanic rock that makes up the mass of Round Top Mountain and caps the beryllium-uranium deposits which occur in the underlying limestone; some 100 more were drilled on Little Round Top, Sierra Blanca and Little Blanca Mountains.

The Texas Bureau of Economic Geology, working with the project geologists, conducted an investigation of the rhyolite to better understand its rare metal content. This research shows that the rhyolite laccoliths at Sierra Blanca are enriched in a variety of REEs and other rare elements such as tantalum, niobium, thorium and lithium. They analyzed a series of samples from outcrop and drill holes and studied the geochemistry and mineralogy of the rhyolite. The results of their research were published in the GSA, Geological Society of America, Special Paper 246, 1990.  The research states that the thorium is presently in the rhyolite, and generally is more difficult to separate from the adjoining rock and is slightly radioactive.  

On October 27, 2011, the Company announced that it had completed Phase I of its metallurgical testing and characterization.  The testing performed by Mountain States laboratory reconfirmed that the rare earth minerals are finely disseminated throughout the rhyolite host rock. Based on the initial ore characterization, the testing reconfirms the simplistic rare earth element mineral associations, which suggests favorable metallurgical processing options. These results also suggest that the mineralogy should provide favorable low costs for metallurgical processing, which the Company believes will provide a significant competitive advantage. The Company has contracted Phase II of the metallurgical characterization to Mountain States laboratory. Phase II is currently underway and is focused on pre-concentration evaluation and other diagnostic testing. This program is expected to provide the basis for the Company’s scoping study, which is targeted to be completed in 2012.

-27-

The Round Top Project rhyolite requires further evaluation of its mineralogical makeup and economic modeling to determine the appropriate course for potential future commercial development.  However, the size of this rhyolite deposit, the high percentage (67%) of heavy rare earth elements to the total rare earth elements and the projected increase in HREE demand could result in Round Top becoming a reliable and long term domestic source for these increasingly strategic metals.

Project Exploration History

The Round Top rare earths and uranium-beryllium prospects were initially drilled in 1984 and 1985, during which time the ore body known as the "West End Ore Zone" was discovered by Cabot Corporation.  In subsequent years, Cyprus Minerals Corporation took over the exploration activities.  Cyprus drilled additional exploration holes and also put an adit into the ore zone where 1,115 feet of underground workings were driven.  Cyprus developed the underground workings in order to obtain bulk samples for pilot plant testing and beryllium oxide concentrate generation.  Cyprus ultimately put the project on hold as a result of poor beryllium market conditions.  Cyprus eventually merged with Phelps Dodge Corporation and the new company allowed the lease with the state of Texas to lapse.

In March 2011, the Company completed an analysis of 1,103 drill samples from the 1984-88 drilling program initially conducted on the Round Top Project by third party operators. All or a portion of forty-six out of an estimated two hundred fifty existing drill holes have been re-logged and re-analyzed. The rare earth element and other metals are consistent with the original study by the Texas Bureau of Geology that was published in the Geological Society of America, Special Paper 246 in 1990. This study first described the rare metal content of the large mass of intrusive igneous rock that makes up the body of Round Top Mountain, and is the basis for our interest in this deposit. The nine drill holes cited below were selected because they are widely distributed and roughly define an area approximately six thousand feet by four thousand feet within the approximate seven thousand foot known diameter of the intrusive rhyolite body. They intersected the entire body of the rhyolite.

Current and Planned Exploration Activities

In April 2011, the Texas General Land Office approved the Company’s operation plan for the Round Top Project. The plan calls for the completion of approximately 50 drill holes totaling at least 12,000 feet of reverse circulation drilling.  The Company began exploratory drilling on the 50 drill whole sites in July 2011.  The Company expects the drill program to span the next three to six months while concurrent testing activities will be ongoing.

The Company has since expanded the exploration drilling program to include up to 160,000 ft. with approximately 180 drill hole locations.  This expansion has been approved by the Texas General Land Office.  The program is intended to achieve development, infill and exploration drilling objectives to support a scoping level and pre-feasibility study for the rare earths opportunity.   The program included 4,000 feet of Core drilling to establish a high level of confidence in “Item 1. Descriptionthe resource, provide physical engineering data and additional metallurgical sample.

-28-

Drilling on the Round Top Project is planned to twin certain of Business.”the historic drill holes, infill drill between existing holes and step out drill beyond the known area to better define the margins of the deposit. Coverage is planned to be adequate to begin block modeling of the deposit. The Company has designated the sites for several holes on adjacent Little Round Top Mountain, and several additional holes are planned to test the deeper potential. This drilling is expected to produce at least 150 tonnes of sample, all of which will be stored and used for metallurgical testing.

Importantly, aside from the large scale-low grade potential, there is geologic evidence that suggests that higher grade concentrations of these elements may be present in the deeper parts of this mineralizing system. Only the upper parts of the rhyolite body have been drilled and there was no thought given to developing the potential rare earth resources at the time of the Cabot-Cyprus project.

Exploration Costs

To date we have incurred exploration costs at the Round Top Project of approximately $1.8 million.  In the fiscal year ending August 31, 2012 we anticipate that total exploration costs will be approximately $8.8 million, with the current budget of exploration expenditures on the project as follow:

Expenditure Description($)
Direct drilling  and drilling support costs5,500,000
Metallurgical testing & pilot plant design1,000,000
Scoping & environmental studies1,000,000
Payroll, payroll taxes, benefits and field travel650,000
Other exploration costs650,000

Other Properties

In addition to the Round Top Project, we also own title to 12 unpatented mining claims, the Macho group, comprising 240 acres covering the Old Dude Mine, located in Sierra County, New Mexico. The Old Dude Mine has a production history of silver, lead, zinc and gold dating from the 1890’s.  Another 18 unpatented mining claims and fractional claims, the HA group,  comprising 274 acres  cover an andesite hosted vein system similar to and some 10 miles to the southwest of the Macho District. These claims surround another historic producer, the Graphic Mine. The geologic setting at the HA property is the same as the Macho.

We do not consider these prospects to be material to the Company’s operations, and at the present time there is no exploration or development activity scheduled for these New Mexico properties.

ItemITEM 3.  Legal ProceedingsLEGAL PROCEEDINGS

From time to time, the Company may become involved in litigation relating to claims arising out of its operations in the normal course of business. No legal proceedings, government actions, administrative actions, investigations or claims are currently pending against us or involve the Company.  There are no proceedings in which any of the directors, officers or affiliates of the Company, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to that of the Company.

ItemITEM 4.  REMOVED[REMOVED AND RESERVEDRESERVED]

 
-23--29-

 
PART II

ItemITEM 5.  Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities.MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

Our common stock is listed for quotation on the Pink Sheets published byOTCQB market tier of the OTC MarketsMarket Group, Inc. under the symbol “TRER.”  The market for our common stock on the Pink SheetsOTCQB is limited, sporadic and highly volatile.  The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down or commission and may not represent actual transactions.  The following table sets forth the range of high and low bid prices during the last three fiscal years, as well as the quarter ended November 30, 2010.periods indicated.

Fiscal Year 2011 High  Low 
Quarter ended November 30, 2010 $3.05  $0.65 
         
Fiscal Year 2010 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2010 $1.02  $0.25 
Quarter ended May 31, 2010 $0.99  $0.55 
Quarter ended February 28, 2010 $1.05  $0.36 
Quarter ended November 30, 2009 $1.08  $0.37 
         
Fiscal Year 2009 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2009 $2.05  $0.11 
Quarter ended May 31, 2009 $0.51  $0.11 
Quarter ended February 28, 2009 $0.51  $0.11 
Quarter ended November 30, 2008 $0.69  $0.11 
         
Fiscal Year 2008 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2008 $0.50  $0.17 
Quarter ended May 31, 2008 $0.54  $0.16 
Quarter ended February 29, 2008 $0.40  $0.11 
Quarter ended November 30, 2007 $0.44  $0.20 
Fiscal Year 2012 High  Low 
Quarter ended November 30, 2011 (through November 11, 2011) $2.55  $1.50 
         
Fiscal Year 2011 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2011 $8.20  $1.80 
Quarter ended May 31, 2011 $10.00  $2.85 
Quarter ended February 28, 2011 $3.99  $2.70 
Quarter ended November 30, 2010 $3.05  $0.65 
         
Fiscal Year 2010 High  Low 
Quarter ended August 31, 2010 $1.02  $0.25 
Quarter ended May 31, 2010 $0.99  $0.55 
Quarter ended February 28, 2010 $1.05  $0.36 
Quarter ended November 30, 2009 $1.08  $0.37 
         

The last bid price of our common stock on January 31,November 12, 2011 was $3.05$1.68 per share.
 
Holders
 
The approximate number of holders of record of our common stock as of January 31,November 11, 2011 was 520.509.
 
Dividends
 
We have not paid any cash dividends on our equity security and our board of directors has no present intention of declaring any cash dividends.  We are not prohibited from paying any dividends pursuant to any agreement or contract.

Repurchase of Securities

During the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, neither the Company nor any affiliate of the Company repurchased common shares of the Company registered under Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

 
-24--30-

 
Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

In September 2008, the board of directors adopted our 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “2008 Plan)Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in September 2008.  TheIn May 2011, the board of directors adopted an amendment to our 2008 Plan allows(the “Amended 2008 Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in August 2011. The Amended 2008 Plan increased the number of shares available for the grant offrom 2,000,000 to up to 2,000,0005,000,000 shares of our common stock for awards to our offices,officers, directors, employees and consultants.  TheOther provisions of the Amended 2008 Plan provides forremain the grant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and stock grant awards. Thesame as under our 2008 Plan also permits the grant of awards that qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception to the $1,000,000 limitation on the deduction of compensation imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code.Plan.  As of January 18,August 31, 2011, a total of 2,000,000575,000 shares of our commo ncommon stock remained available for future grants under the Amended 2008 Plan.  The following table sets forth certain information as of August 31, 20102011 concerning our common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of options or warrants or pursuant to purchases of stock under the Amended 2008 Plan:

Plan Category
(a)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon the Exercise of Outstanding Options and Warrants
(b)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Warrants
(c)
Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
(a)
Number of Securities to be Issued Upon the Exercise of Outstanding Options and Warrants
(b)
Weighted-Average Exercise Price of Outstanding Options and Warrants
(c)
Available for Future Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans (Excluding Securities Reflected in Column (a))
Equity compensation plans approved by stockholders0N/A2,000,0004,425,000$2.52575,000
Equity compensation plans not approved by stockholders--N/A----N/A--
  
Total0N/A2,000,0004,425,000$2.52575,000
 
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities During Fiscal 20102011
 
NoneOutside of the below recent sales of unregistered securities, all other sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, were previously reported under the Company’s quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and Current Reports on Form 8-K.
 
Date
 
Description
 
Number
 
Purchaser
Proceeds
($)
 
Consideration
Exemption
(A)
 
 
June 2011
 
 
Common Stock
 
 
443,750
Private Placement
Investors (4)
 
 
$257,188
 
 
Cash
 
 
4(2)
 
 
July 2011
 
 
Common Stock
 
 
42,500
Private Placement Investor (1)
 
 
$21,250
 
 
Cash
 
 
4(2)
 
 
August 2011
 
 
Common Stock
 
 
93,750
Private Placement Investor (1)
 
 
$54,688
 
 
Cash
 
 
4(2)
       
(A)  With respect to sales designated by “Sec. 4(2),” these shares were issued pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as privately negotiated, isolated, non-recurring transactions not involving any public offer or solicitation. Each purchaser represented that such purchaser’s intention to acquire the shares for investment only and not with a view toward distribution. We requested our stock transfer agent to affix appropriate legends to the stock certificate issued to each purchaser and the transfer agent affixed the appropriate legends. Each purchaser was given adequate access to sufficient information about us to make an informed investment decision. None of the securities were sold through an underwriter and accordingly, there were no underwriting discounts or commissions involved.

ItemITEM 6.  Selected Financial DataSELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
 
As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.Not applicable.
 
-31-

ItemITEM 7.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

This Management’s DiscussionYou should read the following discussion and Analysis should be read in conjunctionanalysis of our financial condition and results of operations together with theour financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report.  This discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions.  See “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.”  Our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. and notes thereto asmany factors, including, but not limited to, those set forth herein. Readers are also urged to carefully reviewunder “Risk Factors” and consider the various disclosures made by us, which attempt to advise interested parties of the factors which affect our business, including without limitation, the disclosures made under “Risk Factors.”elsewhere in this Annual Report

Overview

The Company changed its name from “Standard Silver Corporation” to “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.” effective as of September 1, 2010.  Our common stock is currently listed for quotation in the Pink Sheets, a centralized quotation service maintained by OTC Markets Inc. that collects and publishes market maker quotes for over-the-counter securities (PK:TRER).

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1970.  In July 2004, our articles of incorporation were amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 25,000,000 common shares and, in April 2007, we affected a 1-for-2 reverse stock split.  In September 2008, our articles of incorporation were further amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 100,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01 per share and to authorize 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.  The Company’s fiscal year-end is August 31.

We are a mining company engaged in the business of the acquisition and development of mineral properties.  We currently hold a twenty year lease, executed in August 2010, to explore and develop an 860 acre rare earth uranium-beryllium prospect located in Hudspeth County, Texas known as “Round Top”the Round Top Project and prospecting permits covering an adjacent 9,345 acres.  We also hold prospecting permits on certain other mineral properties located in Texas and New Mexico.  We are currently not evaluating any additional prospects, and intend to focus the primarily on the development of our Round Top rare earth prospect.Project.  We currently have limited operations and have not established that our Round Top propertyProject contains any proven reserves or probable reserves.reserves under SEC Industry Guide 7. The strategic necessity of deve lopingdeveloping rare earth resources, the compelling fundamentals of uranium and the future potential for beryllium in the nuclear fuel cycle all present what we believe to be excellent opportunities for us.

-25-

We intend to (i)(I) conduct a geologic and radiometric study of the surface of the rhyolite to define areas where beryllium, rare earth minerals and thorium are concentrated in fractures, breccias or magmatic segregations, and to understand the distribution of uranium in this rock (ii) conduct radiation and geologic mapping underground to better define the distribution and habit of occurrence of the uranium, (iii) re-log drill samples that are stored on the property with emphasis on uranium and rare metal distribution (iv) conduct a sampling and laboratory examination program to determine the precise mineralogy of the rare elements in the rhyolite and (v) use these results to develop a drill program to test higher grade rare earth targets deeper in the rhyolite.

We currently do not have any producing properties and consequently, we have no current operating income or cash flow and have not generated any revenues.  Further exploration will be required before a final evaluation as to the economic and practical feasibility of any of theour properties is determined.  We plan to raise additional capital to exploit current projects, including the Round Top Project, and to acquire, evaluate, and develop new properties.

Between 2003 and 2007, our operations were minimal.  In 2007 we acquired (i) interests in two mineral properties, the Old Hadley and the Macho Mines, located in southwestern New Mexico, (ii) a 28.5% interest in La Cañada Mining and Exploration LLC (“La Cañada”), (iii) the King Mine located in Boise County, Idaho, and (iv) rights to lease the Round Top Beryllium Deposit (“Round Top Deposit”) located in Hudspeth County, Texas.  In June 2008, the Old Hadley and Round Top Deposit mines were assigned to La Cañada in exchange for La Cañada’s commitment to finance and develop the assigned properties.  In September 2008, La Cañada assigned these two mines back to us.  In October 2009, La Cañada redeemed our 28.5% interest.  In January 2009, the Company relinquished all of its rights to the King Mine.

Results of Operations

Fiscal Years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009

General & Revenue

We had no operating revenues during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009.  We are not currently profitable.  As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of $1,422,634 as of August 31, 2010.  As discussed in the Company’s financial statements, the Company’s absence of significant revenues, recurring losses from operations, and its need for additional financing in order to fund its projected loss raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern.

Operating expenses and resulting losses from Operations.

We incurred exploration costs for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, in the amount of $126,929 and $19,042, respectively.  These expenditures were primarily related to outside consulting services relating to our Round Top project.  Our general and administrative expenses for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were $424,987 and $32,749, primarily for professional fees associated with the audits of our financial statements, director stock-based compensation in the amount of $249,000 and other general and administrative expenses necessary for our operations.  We had losses from operations for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, totaling $551,916 and $73,590.  We recorded an impairment loss on mineral property investments in the am ount of $21,799 for the year ended August 31, 2009 and an impairment loss on notes receivable in the amount of $54,370 for the year ended August 31, 2009 from our investment in La Canada.  Our net loss for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, was $558,380 and $134,043.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

AtAs of August 31, 2010,2011, we had current assets totaling $74,434 and current liabilities totaling $111,072, resulting ina working capital deficitsurplus of $36,638.  During the year ended August 31, 2010,approximately $16,344,000. We believe we invested $30,536 in property, plant and equipment and $44,539 in mineral properties.  For the year ended August 31, 2010, we received $455,000 from the sale of common stock and repaid $75,000 on notes payable to related parties.  For the year ended August 31, 2009, we received advances from related party loans totaling $56,000.

-26-

Between September 2009 and November 2010 (the “2009-2010 Private Placement”), the Company raised $905,500 through the issuance of 2,263,750 shares of common stock and the issuance of Class A Warrants to purchase 2,263,750 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants to purchase 1,131,875 shares of common stock.  Between December 2010 and January 2011, Class A Warrants to purchase 437,500 shares were exercised, and Class B Warrants to purchase 218,750 shares were exercised, resulting in $382,843 of proceeds being raised by the Company.  The Company has, and will continue to, use these proceeds for working capital purposes.

In January 2011, we entered into a series of transactions with accredited investors (the “January 2011 Private Placement”) pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 800,000 shares of our common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $2,000,000.  As additional consideration for the purchase of the shares and warrants, the Company issued to the January 2011 Private Placement investors options to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at $2.50 per share and 100% warrant coverage through the issuance of warrants to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.  The Company intends to use proceeds from this financing to fund working capital needs for the balance of calendar 2011. The Company paid cash commissions of $208,000 and issued five year warrants to purchase up to 169,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share in connection with the sale of its securities in the January 2011 Private Placement. 

Because of the recurring losses, the Company will require additionalhave sufficient working capital to fund its business operations.continue our planned operations through calendar year 2012. We will need to raise additional funding subsequent to fiscal year 2012 to continue our exploration and development activities.  As of the date hereof, the Company is unablenot able to quantify the amount of capital needed to fund its working capital needs after calendar 2011,fiscal 2012, nor is it able to quantify the amount of capital needed to develop the Round Top project.Project. The amount of capital will be dependent upon the Company’s exploration results and business strategy to exploit the Round Top project.Project.  The Company intends to raise additional working capital through best efforts debt or equity financing.financing, as we have no firm commitments for equity capital investments to any established credit facility.  No assurance can be given that additional financing will be available on terms acceptable to the Company.  The Company’s viability is contingent upon its ability to receive external financing.  Failure to obtain sufficient working capital may result in management resorting to the sale of assets or otherwise curtailing operations.

-32-

During the twelve month period ending August 31, 2011, we invested approximately $99,000 in mineral properties, including $65,000 paid in April with the submission and approval of our Initial Plan of Operations.  We also expensed a payment of approximately $45,000 in August for our “delay rental” payment to the State of Texas.  In September and October 2011, we were required to pay approximately $10,500 for prospecting permits to the State of Texas for our Round Top Project.  

During the twelve months ended August 31, 2011, we purchased equipment and mining software totaling approximately $90,000 and approximately $38,000 for 2 vehicles for our Round Top Project.  In June 2011, we established our corporate office in Englewood, Colorado and spent approximately $83,000 for office furniture and equipment.

In August 2011, our Board of Directors unanimously approved our operating budget for the twelve month fiscal year ending August 31, 2012.  Over the next twelve months we plan to conduct significant geological studies, sampling and drilling at our Round Top property.  The timing of these expenditures is dependent upon a number of factors, including the availability of drilling contractors. We estimate our exploration expenditures will total approximately $8,800,000 which includes expenditures for, among other things, drilling of samples, metallurgical testing, scoping studies and appropriate staff and consulting expenses.  Our exploration activities will be carried out by our geologic staff and such qualified outside contractors as is necessary.  Our capital expenditures for the next twelve months will be insignificant.

We estimate that our general and administrative expenditures, which will be spent ratably over the next twelve months, to total approximately $1,600,000.  Payroll, payroll taxes, benefits and associated travel for employees is estimated to be $925,000 over this period of time.  We estimate that we will incur professional fees of approximately $200,000 over the next twelve months.  These fees will be primarily associated with the audit and reviews of our financial statements, legal fees and public relations.  The remainder of our general and administrative expenditures will be for items necessary for us to conduct our general business affairs.  

We have Class A Warrants that may be exercised at $0.50 per share, into 1,418,750 shares of common stock, Class B Warrants that may be exercised, at $0.75 per share, into 740,625 shares of common stock.  These warrants expire on December 31, 2011.

Between January and June 2011, we entered into a series of transactions with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 7,840,000 shares of our common stock at $2.50 for gross proceeds of $19,600,000 and five year warrants to purchase up to 7,840,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share.  We intend to use proceeds from this financing to fund working capital needs for the balance of fiscal year 2012.  

Results of Operations

Fiscal Years ended August 31, 2011and 2010

General  & Revenue

We had no operating revenues during the fiscal years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010.  We are not currently profitable.  As a result of ongoing operating losses, we had an accumulated deficit of approximately $8,443,000 as of August 31, 2011.

Operating expenses and resulting losses from Operations.

We incurred exploration costs for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010, in the amount of approximately $1,292,000 and $127,000, respectively.  The expenditures for the fiscal year ended 2011 were primarily for surveys, drilling and related geological consulting fees for our Round Top project.  The fiscal year ended 2010 expenditures were primarily related to outside consulting services relating to our Round Top project.  The increase in exploration costs was the result of us initiating exploration on our Round Top Project in the fiscal year ended 2011.

-33-

Our general and administrative expenses for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, were approximately $5,755,000 and $425,000.  For the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, this amount included non-cash expenses of approximately $1,181,000 of stock compensation for Public Relations services, approximately $2,500,000 of stock compensation to members of our Board of Directors and approximately $880,000 of stock compensation to three of our executive officers.  The remaining expenditures totaling approximately $1,194,000 were primarily for investor relations, professional fees associated with the audits of our financial statements, payroll and related taxes and benefits, legal fees and other general and administrative expenses necessary for our operations.  Our general and administrative expenses for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2010 were primarily for professional fees associated with the audits of our financial statements, director stock-based compensation in the amount of $249,000 and other general and administrative expenses necessary for our operations.

We had losses from operations for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, totaling approximately $7,047,000 and $552,000 and net losses for the fiscal years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, of$7,020,000 and $558,000.  We earned interest and other income in the amount of approximately $28,000 for the fiscal year ended August 2011.

Contractual Commitments

In August 2010, we entered into a mining lease with the Texas General Land Office covering Sections 7 and 18 of Township 7, Block 71 and Section 12 of Block 72, covering approximately 860 acres in Hudspeth County, Texas. Under the lease, we will pay the State of Texas a lease bonus of $197,800, $35,000 of which was paid upon the execution of the lease, $65,000 of which will be duewas paid in April 2011 when we submitsubmitted our initial plan of operations to conduct exploration, and $97,800 of which will be due when we submit a supplemental plan of operations to conduct mining.  Upon the sale of minerals removed from Round Top, we will pay the State of Texas a $500,000 minimum advance royalty.  Thereafter, we will pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materia lsmaterials removed and sold from Round Top and six and one quarter percent (6 ¼%) of the market value of all other minerals removed and sold from Round Top.

IfSince production of paying quantities of minerals haswas not been obtained on or before August 17, 2011, we may paypaid the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the term of the lease in an amount equal to $44,718.of approximately $45,000.  Thereafter, assuming production of paying quantities has not been obtained, we may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:

 Per Acre Amount  Total Amount  Per Acre Amount  Total Amount 
August 17, 2012 – 2014 $50  $44,718  $50  $44,718 
August 17, 2015 – 2019 $75  $67,077  $75  $67,077 
August 17, 2019 – 2024 $150  $134,155 
August 17, 2020 – 2024 $150  $134,155 
August 17, 2025 – 2029 $200  $178,873  $200  $178,873 

Other Contractual Commitments

From time to time, we may enter into employee agreements with certain key employees.  We currently have employment agreements with our CEO and CFO.

We currently have leases with landlords for our corporate headquarters in Englewood, Colorado, an office warehouse in El Paso, Texas and an administrative office in Sierra Blanca.  These leases expire on dates from December 2012 through May 2014.

 
-27--34-

 
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

For the fiscal years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010, we did not have any Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

Fair value of Financial Instruments - The Company will be required to adopt ASC topic 820, “Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures” (ASC 820), formerly SFAS No. 157 “Fair Value Measurements,” effective September 1, 2009. ASC 820 defines “fair value” as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Management does not expect there to be any impact relating to the adoption of ASC 820 to the Company’s financial statements.
   
  ASC 820 also describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
 Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
 Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
 Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable. These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
 
Financial instruments consist principally of cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities. The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying balance sheets approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature. It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

Accounting Standards Codification - In June 2009, the FASB issued ASC 105 Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. The FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) has become the source of authoritative accounting principles recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities in the preparation of financial statements in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”). All existing accounting standard documents are superseded by the Codification and any accounting literature not included in the Codification will not be a uthoritative.authoritative. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC issued under the authority of federal securities laws, however, will continue to be the source of authoritative generally accepted accounting principles for SEC registrants. Effective September 1, 2009, all references made to GAAP in our financial statements will include references to the new Codification. The Codification does not change or alter existing GAAP and, therefore, will not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position, or cash flow.
 
Critical Accounting Estimates
 
Management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. Preparation of financial statements requires management to make assumptions, estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses, and the related disclosures of contingencies. Management bases its estimates on various assumptions and historical experience, which are believed to be reasonable; however, due to the inherent nature of estimates, actual results may differ significantly due to changed conditions or assumptions. On a regular basis, management reviews the accounting policies, assumptions, estimates and judgments to ensure that our financial statements are fairly presented in accordance with G AAP.GAAP. However, because future events and their effects cannot be determined with certainty, actual results could differ from our assumptions and estimates, and such differences could be material. Management believes that the following critical accounting estimates and judgments have a significant impact on our financial statements.

-35-

ItemITEM 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk.QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As smaller reporting company, as defined by Rule 229.10(f)(1), we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.
Not applicable.
 
-28-

ItemITEM 8.  Financial Statements and Supplementary DataFINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA



Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm



To the Shareholders and Board of Directors of
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. (Formerly Standard Silver Corporation)Corp
Houston, TexasEnglewood, Colorado

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.  (formerly Standard Silver Corporation) (theCorp(the “Company”) as of August 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the related statements of operations, cash flows, and stockholders'shareholders' equity (deficit) for the years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits include consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit also includes examining, on a t esttest basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. as of August 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.




/s/ LBB & Associates Ltd., LLP
December 21, 2010, except for Note 8,
for which the date is February 6,October 17, 2011

 
-29--36-

 
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp 
BALANCE SHEETS 
  
  August 31, 2011  August 31, 2010 
       
ASSETS      
       
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash & cash equivalents $16,886,066  $74,434 
Prepaid expenses and other current assets  37,579   - 
Total current assets  16,923,645   74,434 
         
Property and equipment, net  217,519   26,559 
Mineral properties  143,356   44,539 
Deposits  16,525   - 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $17,301,045  $145,532 
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
    Accounts payable and accrued liabilities $579,807  $20,624 
    Notes and interest payable to related parties  -   90,448 
   Total current liabilities  579,807   111,072 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no        
      shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2011 and 2010  -   - 
Common stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized,        
   34,596,260 and 23,670,260 issued and outstanding as of        
   August 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively  345,964   236,703 
   Additional paid-in capital  24,818,022   1,220,391 
   Accumulated deficit  (8,442,748)  (1,422,634)
   Total shareholders' equity  16,721,238   34,460 
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY $17,301,045  $145,532 
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.        
TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP 
(Formerly Standard Silver Corporation) 
BALANCE SHEETS 
       
  August 31, 2010  August 31, 2009 
       
ASSETS      
       
CURRENT ASSETS      
Cash & cash equivalents $74,434  $- 
         
Total current assets  74,434   - 
         
Property and equipment, net  26,559   - 
Mineral properties  44,539   - 
         
TOTAL ASSETS $145,532  $- 
         
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
         
CURRENT LIABILITIES        
    Accounts payable and accrued expenses $20,624  $12,456 
    Notes and interest payable to related parties  90,448   157,954 
   Total current liabilities  111,072   170,410 
         
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES        
         
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT)        
Preferred stock, par value $0.001; 10,000,000 shares authorized, no        
      shares issued and outstanding as of August 31, 2010 and 2009  -   - 
Common stock, par value $0.01; 100,000,000 shares authorized        
   23,670,260 and 22,655,260 issued and outstanding as of        
   August 31, 2010 and August 31, 2009, respectively  236,703   226,553 
   Additional paid-in capital  1,220,391   467,291 
   Accumulated deficit  (1,422,634)  (864,254)
   Total shareholders' equity (deficit)  34,460   (170,410)
         
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) $145,532  $- 
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.        
 
-30-37

 
TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP 
(Formerly Standard Silver Corporation) 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
       
  Year ended  Year ended 
  August 31,  August 31, 
  2010  2009 
       
OPERATING EXPENSES      
   Exploration costs $126,929  $19,042 
   General & administrative expenses  424,987   32,749 
   Impairment loss on mineral property investment  -   21,799 
         
Total operating expenses  551,916   73,590 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (551,916)  (73,590)
         
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE        
Interest and other income  (1,031)  (2,623)
Interest expense  7,495   8,706 
Impairment loss on notes receivable  -   54,370 
Total other (income) expense  6,464   60,453 
         
NET LOSS $(558,380) $(134,043)
         
Net loss per share:        
    Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.02) $(0.01)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding:        
        Basic and diluted  23,433,144   21,031,972 
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.     

TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP 
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS 
       
  Year ended  Year ended 
  August 31,  August 31, 
  2011  2010 
       
OPERATING EXPENSES      
   Exploration costs $1,291,570  $126,929 
   General & administrative expenses  5,754,983   424,987 
         
Total operating expenses  7,046,553   551,916 
         
LOSS FROM OPERATIONS  (7,046,553)  (551,916)
         
OTHER (INCOME) EXPENSE        
Interest and other income  (27,705)  (1,031)
Interest expense  1,266   7,495 
Total other (income) expense  (26,439)  6,464 
         
NET LOSS $(7,020,114) $(558,380)
         
Net loss per share:        
    Basic and diluted net loss per share $(0.25) $(0.02)
         
Weighted average shares outstanding:        
        Basic and diluted  27,869,787   23,433,144 
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.        
 
-31-38

 
TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP 
(Formerly Standard Silver Corporation) 
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' DEFICIT 
For the Years Ended August 31, 2010 
                
  Common Stock       
  Shares  Amount  
Additional Paid-in Capital
  Accumulated Deficit  Total 
                
Balance at August 31, 2008  15,155,260  $151,553  $542,291  $(730,211) $(36,367)
                     
Share issuances  7,500,000   75,000   (75,000)  -   - 
Net loss  -   -   -   (134,043)  (134,043)
Balance at August 31, 2009  22,655,260   226,553   467,291   (864,254)  (170,410)
                     
Shares issued for cash proceeds  1,000,000   10,000   390,000   -   400,000 
Units subscribed  -   -   55,000   -   55,000 
Shares issued for services  15,000   150   13,350   -   13,500 
Stock-based compensation, shares                  - 
  issued October 2010  -   -   249,000   -   249,000 
Shares owed for services  -   -   45,750   -   45,750 
Net loss  -   -   -   (558,380)  (558,380)
Balance at August 31, 2010  23,670,260  $236,703  $1,220,391  $(1,422,634) $34,460 
                     
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements         








TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP
STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
FOR THE YEARS ENDED AUGUST 31, 2010 and 2011
                      
                      
                      
              Additional     Total 
  Preferred stock  Common Stock  Paid-in  Accumulated  Stockholder's 
  Shares  Amount  Shares  Amount  Capital  Deficit  Deficit 
                      
Balance as of August 31, 2009  -  $-   22,655,260  $226,553  $467,291  $(864,254) $(170,410)
Shares issued for cash proceeds  -   -   1,000,000   10,000   390,000   -   400,000 
Units subscribed  -   -   -   -   55,000   -   55,000 
Shares issed for services  -   -   15,000   150   13,350   -   13,500 
Stock compensation, shares issed in October 2010  -   -   -   -   249,000   -   249,000 
Shares owed for services  -   -   -   -   45,750   -   45,750 
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (558,380)  (558,380)
Balance at August 31, 2010  -   -   23,670,260   236,703   1,220,391   (1,422,634)  34,460 
Shares issed for prior year compensation  -   -   361,000   3,610   (3,610)  -   - 
Shares issued for cash  -   -   10,340,000   103,401   20,665,536   -   20,768,937 
Shares issued for services  -   -   225,000   2,250   1,178,796   -   1,181,046 
Common stock options issued to officers and directors  -   -   -   -   3,412,059   -   3,412,059 
Cash paid for placement fees  -   -   -   -   (1,655,150)  -   (1,655,150)
Net loss  -   -   -   -   -   (7,020,114)  (7,020,114)
Balance as of August 31, 2011  -  $-   34,596,260  $345,964  $24,818,022  $(8,442,748) $16,721,238 
                             
 

 
 
-32-39

 
TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP 
(Formerly Standard Silver Corporation) 
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
       
  Year ended  Year ended 
  August 31,  August 31, 
  2010  2009 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net loss $(558,380) $(134,043)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash        
   used in operating activities:        
    Depreciation and amortization  3,977   - 
    Stock-based compensation  249,000   - 
      Shares issued for services  59,250   - 
    Impairment loss on notes receivable  -   54,370 
    Impairment loss on mineral property investments  -   21,799 
    Changes in current assets and liabilities:        
       Interest accrued on notes receivable from related party  -   (5,161)
      Accounts payable and accrued expenses  8,168   5,912 
      Interest accrued on notes payable from related parties  7,494   6,384 
Net cash used in operating activities  (230,491)  (50,739)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
    Capital expenditures  (30,536)  - 
    Mineral property expenditures  (44,539)  - 
  Loans to related parties  -   (16,638)
Net cash used in investing activities  (75,075)  (16,638)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
   Proceeds from sale of common stock  455,000   - 
 Note proceeds from related parties  -   56,000 
 Payments on related party notes payable  (75,000)  - 
Net cash provided by financing activities  380,000   56,000 
NET CHANGE IN CASH  74,434   (11,377)
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  -   11,377 
CASH, END OF PERIOD $74,434  $- 
         
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION        
    Interest paid $-  $2,321 
    Taxes paid $-  $- 
         
NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS:        
  Share issuances for cash previously received $-  $75,000 
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements     
TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP 
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS 
  
       
  Year Ended  Year Ended 
  August 31,  August 31, 
  2011  2010 
       
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES      
Net loss $(7,020,114) $(558,380)
Adjustment to reconcile net loss to net cash        
   used in operating activities:        
Depreciation expense  19,996   3,977 
Stock issued for services  1,181,046   59,250 
Stock based compensation  3,412,059   249,000 
 Changes in current assets and liabilities:        
      Prepaid expenses and other assets  (54,104)  - 
      Interest accrued on notes payable from related parties  1,398   7,494 
      Accounts payable and accrued expenses  559,184   8,168 
Net cash used in operating activities  (1,900,535)  (230,491)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES        
 Investment in mineral properties  (98,817)  (44,539)
 Purchase of  fixed assets  (210,957)  (30,536)
Net cash used in investing activities  (309,774)  (75,075)
         
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES        
Net proceeds from sale of common stock  19,113,787   455,000 
Repayment of notes payable to related parties  (91,846)  (75,000)
Net cash provided by financing activities  19,021,941   380,000 
NET CHANGE IN CASH  16,811,632   74,434 
CASH, BEGINNING OF PERIOD  74,434   - 
CASH, END OF PERIOD $16,886,066  $74,434 
         
         
SUPPLEMENTAL INFORMATION        
    Interest paid $18,936  $- 
    Taxes paid $-  $- 
    Issuance of 131,250 shares of common stock for cash previously received $1,313  $- 
    Issuance of 61,000 shares of common stock for services previously recorded $610  $- 
    Issuance of 300,000 shares of common stock for director compensation        
      previously recorded $3,000  $- 
         
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.        
 
-33-40

 
Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.
Notes to financial statements
August 31, 20102011 and 20092010

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND NATURE OF BUSINESS

Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp. (formerly Standard Silver Corporation)Corp (the “Company” or “Standard Silver”) was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1970.  In July 2004, our articles of incorporation were amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 25,000,000 common shares and, in April 2007, we affected a 1-for-2 reverse stock split.  In September 2008, our articles of incorporation were further amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 100,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01 per share and to authorize 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.  The Company’s fiscal year-end is August 31.
The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada in 1970.  In July 2004, our articles of incorporation were amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 25,000,000 common shares and, in April 2007, we affected a 1-for-2 reverse stock split.  In September 2008, our articles of incorporation were further amended and restated to increase the authorized capital to 100,000,000 common shares with a par value of $0.01 per share and to authorize 10,000,000 preferred shares with a par value of $0.001 per share.  The Company’s fiscal year-end is August 31.

Between 2003 and 2007, our operations were minimal.  In 2007 we acquired (i) interests in two mineral properties, the Old Hadley and the Macho Mines, located in southwestern New Mexico, (ii) a 28.5% interest in La Cañada Mining and Exploration LLC (“La Cañada”), (iii) the King Mine located in Boise County, Idaho, and (iv) rights to lease the Round Top Beryllium Deposit (“Round Top Deposit”) located in Hudspeth County, Texas.  In June 2008, the Old Hadley and Round Top Deposit mines were assigned to La Cañada in exchange for La Cañada’s commitment to finance and develop the assigned properties.  In September 2008, La Cañada assigned these two mines back to Standard Silver.the Company.  In October 2009, the Company divested itself of any interest in La Ca ñada.Cañada.  In January 2009, the Company relinquished all of its rights to the King Mine.

Effective September 1, 2010, the Company changed its name from “Standard Silver Corporation” to “Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.”We are now a mining company engaged in the business of the acquisition and development of mineral properties.  As of the date of this filing, we hold a twenty year lease, executed in August 2010, to explore and develop an 860 acre rare earth uranium-beryllium prospect located in Hudspeth County, Texas known as “Round Top”, and prospecting permits covering an adjacent 9,670 acres.  We also hold prospecting permits on certain other mineral properties located in Texas and New Mexico.  We are currently not evaluating any additional prospects, and intend to focus the primarily on the development of our Round Top rare earth prospect.

For the years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company incurred losses of $558,380 and $134,043, respectively, and had a working capital deficit of $36,638 as of August 31, 2010.  The Company continues to finance its minimal operations through loans from shareholders and proceeds from the private placement of shares.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

Our financial records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting whereby revenues are recognized when earned and expenses are recorded when incurred.  Effective July 1, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Standard No. 168, also known as Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 105, which established the ASC as the primary source of authoritativeincurred, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) recognized by the FASB to be applied to nongovernmental entities.  Although the establishment of ASC did not change current GAAP, it did change the way we refer to GAAP throughout our financial statements to reflect the updated referencing convention.  As of the date of this filing, we have adopted ASC 105.– United States.

-34-

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.  Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits at commercial banks.

Investments

Investments  The Company current has cash deposits at financial institutions in entities over which the Company can exercise significant influence, but not control, are accounted for under the equity methodexcess of accounting.  Whether the Company exercises significant influence with respect to an investment depends on an evaluation of several factors including, among others, representation on the investee’s board of directors and ownership level, generally 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities of the investee including voting rights associated with the Company’s holdings in common, preferred, and other convertible instruments in the investee.  Under the equity method of accounting, the Company’s share of the earnings or losses of these companies is included in the Statements of Operations.  The Company’s investment in La Cañada was accou nted for under the equity method until redemption in October 2009.  As of August 31, 2010, the Company does not have any investments accounted for under the equity method of accounting.

A loss in value of an investment that is other than a temporary decline is recognized as a charge to operations.  Evidence of a loss in value might include, but would not necessarily be limited to, absence of an ability to recover the carrying amount of the investment or inability of the investee to sustain an earnings capacity that would justify the carrying amount of the investment.federally insured limits.

Property and Equipment

The Company’s property and equipment consists primarily of vehicles and are recorded at cost. Expenditures related to acquiring or extending the useful life of our property, plant and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for repair and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over an estimated useful life of 3-20 years.

41

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

Lease Deposits

From time to time, the Company makes deposits in anticipation of executing leases.  The deposits are capitalized as an element of mineral properties upon execution of the applicable leases.agreements.

Long-lived Assets

The Company reviews the recoverability of long-lived assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable through operations.  To determine if these costs are in excess of their recoverable amount, periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment.  We have not incurred any impairment losses and, therefore, no impairment is reflected in these financial statements.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, services have been performed, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectability is probable. The Company has yet to generate revenue.  The Company does not yet have any revenues.

Mineral Exploration and Development Costs

All exploration expenditures are expensed as incurred. Costs of acquisition and option costs of mineral rights are capitalized upon acquisition. Mine development costs incurred to develop new ore deposits, to expand the capacity of mines, or to develop mine areas substantially in advance of current production are also capitalized once proven and probable reserves exist and the property is determined to be a commercially mineable property. Costs incurred to maintain current production or to maintain assets on a standby basis are charged to operations. If the Company does not continue with exploration after the completion of the feasibility study, the mineral rights will be expensed at that time. Costs of abandoned projects are charged to mini ngmining costs including related property and equipment costs. To determine if these costs are in excess of their recoverable amount, periodic evaluation of carrying value of capitalized costs and any related property and equipment costs are based upon expected future cash flows and/or estimated salvage value in accordance with ASC 360-10-35-15, Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.Exploration costs were $126,929$1,291,570 and $19,042$126,929 for the years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010, and 2009, respectively.

-35-

Stock-based CompensationShare-based Payments

The Company estimates the fair value of share-based paymentscompensation using the Black-Scholes valuation model, in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718, Stock Compensation and ASC 505, Share-Based Payments.  Key inputs and assumptions used to estimate the fair value of stock options include the grant price of the award, the expected option term, volatility of the Company’s stock, the risk-free rate, and dividend yield.  Estimatesyield.Estimates of fair value are not intended to predict actual future events or the value ultimately realized by the option holders, and subsequent events are not indicative of the reasonableness of the original estimates of fair value made by the Company.

Stock Option Plan

The Company has approvedIn September 2008, the board of directors adopted our 2008 Stock Option Plan (the “Stock Option Plan”) providing“2008 Plan), which was also approved by our shareholders in September 2008.  The 2008 Plan allows for the grant of up to 2,000,000 shares of our common stock for awards to our officers, directors, employees and consultants.  The 2008 Plan provides for the Company’sgrant of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, and stock grant awards. The 2008 Plan also permits the grant of awards that qualify for the “performance-based compensation” exception to be grantedthe $1,000,000 limitation on the deduction of compensation imposed by Section 162(m) of the Code.  In May 2011, the board of directors adopted an amendment to our 2008 Plan (the
42

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

“Amended 2008 Plan”), which was also approved by our shareholders in August 2011. The Amended
2008 Plan increased the number of shares available for grant from 2,000,000 to up to 5,000,000 shares of our common stock for awards to our officers, directors, employees and consultants.  Other provisions of the Amended 2008 Plan remain the same as under our original 2008 Plan.  As of August 31, 2011, a total of 575,000 shares of our common stock remained available for future grants under the terms of the Stock Option Plan.  The Company has not granted any stock options since its inception related to this Stock OptionAmended 2008 Plan.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are computed using the asset and liability method, in accordance with ASC 740, Income Taxes.  Under the asset and liability method, deferred income tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities, and are measured using the currently enacted tax rates and laws.  A valuation allowance is provided for the amount of deferred tax assets that, based on available evidence, are not expected to be realized.

Basic and Diluted Loss Per Share

The Company computes loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings Per Share, which requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share on the face of the Statements of Operations.  Basic loss per share is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of outstanding common shares during the period.  Diluted loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period, including stock options and warrants using the treasury method.  Dilutive loss per share excludes all potential common shares if their effect is anti-dilutive.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.  Management believes that these financial statements include all normal and recurring adjustments necessary for a fair presentation under Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

-36-

Fair Value Measurements

We account for assets and liabilities measured at fair value in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures.  ASC 820 emphasizes that fair value is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement.  Therefore, a fair value measurement should be determined based on the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability.  As a basis for considering market participant assumptions in fair value measurements, ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy that distinguishes between market participant assumptions based on market data obtained from sources independent of the reporting entity (observable inputs that are classified with Levels 1 and 2 of the hierarchy) and the reporting entity̵ 7;sentity’s own assumptions about market participant assumptions (unobservable inputs classified within Level 3 of the hierarchy).  The.The three levels of inputs used to measure fair value are as follows:

 Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities traded in active markets.
 Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.
 Level 3: Inputs that are generally unobservable.  These inputs may be used with internally developed methodologies that result in management’s best estimate of fair value.
 
Our financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities.  The carrying amounts of such financial instruments in the accompanying financial statements approximate their fair values due to their relatively short-term nature.  It is management’s opinion that the Company is not exposed to
43

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

any significant currency or credit risks arising from these financial instruments.

In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820)-Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements, which enhances the usefulness of fair value measurements.  The amended guidance requires both the disaggregation of information in certain existing disclosures, as well as the inclusion of more robust disclosures about valuation techniques and inputs to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements.  The amended guidance is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for the disaggregation requirement for the reconciliation disclosure of Level 3 measurements, which is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and fo rfor interim periods within those years.  The Company adopted ASU 2010-06 effective December 31, 2009, and the adoption did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Pronouncements between August 31, 20102011 and the date of this filing didare not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s operations, financial position, or cash flow, nor does the Company expect the adoption of recently issued, but not yet effective, accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or cash flows.

NOTE 3 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT, NET

Property and equipment consist of office furniture, equipment vehicles, and a motor home.vehicles.  The fixed assets are depreciated using the straight-line method over their estimated useful life of 3-20 years.  Our fixed assets consist of the following:

 August 31, 2010  August 31, 2009  August 31, 2011  August 31, 2010 
Office equipment $195  $- 
Furniture &office equipment $90,959  $195 
Vehicles  22,329   -   68,290   30,341 
Motor home  8,012   - 
Software  31,792   - 
Field equipment  50,451   - 
Total cost basis  30,536   -   241,492   30,536 
Less: Accumulated depreciation  (3,977)  -   (23,973)  (3,977)
Property and equipment, net $26,559  $-  $217,519  $26,559 

Depreciation expense for the years ending August 31, 2011 and 2010 was $19,996 and 2009 was $3,977, and $0, respectively.

NOTE 4 –4– RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has periodicallyhad historically received periodic cash for loansadvances from the Company’s officers and relatives of the Company’s officers to fund operations.  As of August 31, 2010 and 2009, $90,448 and $157,954, respectively, in principal and interest is due and outstanding to the Company’s officers.  The advances are due on December 31, 2010, and accrueaccrued interest at rates ranging from five percent (5%) to six percent (6%) per annum. The loans wereIn December 2010, the notes payable principal balance of $91,846 plus accrued interest for these advances was paid in full in December 2010.
full.
-37-

The Company had periodically loaned money to La Cañada bearing interest ranging from 6.0% to 7.75% per annum.  During the year ended August 31, 2009, the Company loaned an additional $16,638 to La Cañada, bringing the principal balance and accrued interest to $68,638 and $7,531, respectively, as of August 31, 2009.  Effective August 31, 2009, the Company elected to divest its ownership interest in La Cañada.  Accordingly, the Company entered into a Redemption and Mutual Release and Settlement Agreement (“Redemption Agreement”) with La Cañada, in which the Company agreed to pay La Cañada $9,303 as payment in full settlement of the Company’s obligations to La Cañada. In return La Cañada redeemed the 28.5% Standard Silver has in La Cañada back.  As a result, the La Cañada loans and related accrued interest receivable were written off during the year ended August 31, 2009.

NOTE 5 – INVESTMENTSMINERAL PROPERTIES

La Cañada Mining and Exploration LLC

The Company owned a 28.5% interest in La Cañada through October 2009, the date of the Redemption Agreement.

The Company’s investment in La Cañada is accounted for under the equity method based on its ownership interest.  For the years ending August 31, 2010 and 2009, losses of $0 were recorded as the Company’s share of losses of La Cañada.
Round Top Mountain
In August 2010, the Company madewe entered into a $37,200 payment tomining lease with the Texas General Land Office and entered into a twenty year mining lease covering Sections 7 and 18 of Township 7, Block 71 and Section 12 of Block 72, covering approximately 860 acres at Round Top Mountain in Hudspeth County, Texas.  The mining lease issued by the Texas General Land Office gives us the right to explore, produce, develop, mine, extract, mill, remove, and market beryllium, uranium, rare earth elements, all other base and precious metals, industrial minerals and construction materials and all other minerals excluding oil, gas, coal, lignite, sulfur, salt, and potash.  The term of the lease is twenty years so long as minerals are produced in paying quantities.

44

NOTE 5 – MINERAL PROPERTIES (Continued)

Under the lease, we will pay the State of Texas a lease bonus of $197,800, $35,000 of which was paid upon the execution of the lease, $65,000 of which will be duewas paid in April 2011 when we submitsubmitted our initial plan of operations to conduct exploration, and $97,800 of which will be due when we submit a supplemental plan of operations to conduct mining.  Upon the sale of minerals removed from Round Top, we will pay the State of Texas a $500,000 minimum advance royalty.

Thereafter, we will pay the State of Texas a production royalty equal to eight percent (8%) of the market value of uranium and other fissionable materials removed and sold from Round Top and six and one quarter percent (6 ¼%) of the market value of all other minerals removed and sold from Round Top.

If production of paying quantities of minerals has not been obtained on or beforeIn August 17, 2011 we may paypaid the State of Texas a delay rental to extend the term of the lease in an amount equal to $44,718.  Thereafter, assuming production of paying quantities has not been obtained, we may pay additional delay rental fees to extend the term of the lease for successive one (1) year periods pursuant to the following schedule:

 Per Acre Amount  Total Amount  Per Acre Amount Total Amount 
August 17, 2012 – 2014 $50  $44,718  $50 $44,718 
August 17, 2015 – 2019 $75  $67,077  $75 $67,077 
August 17, 2019 – 2024 $150  $134,155 
August 17, 2020 – 2024 $150 $134,155 
August 17, 2025 – 2029 $200  $178,873  $200 $178,873 

-38-

NOTE 6 –6– INCOME TAXES

As of August 31, 20102011 and 2009,2010, the cumulative tax effect at the expected rate of 35% and  34%, respectively, of significant items comprising our net deferred tax amount is as follows:

  August 31, 2011  August 31, 2010 
Net operating loss carryforward $1,625,000  $381,000 
Less: Valuation allowance  (1,625,000)  (381,000)
         
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance $-  $- 
  August 31, 2010  August 31, 2009 
Net operating loss carryforward $381,000  $276,000 
Less: Valuation allowance  (381,000)  (276,000)
         
Deferred tax asset, net of allowance $-   - 

As a result of a change in control effective in April 2007, the Company’s net operating losses prior to that date may be partially or entirely unavailable, by law, to offset future income and, accordingly, are excluded from the associated deferred tax asset.

The provision for income taxes for the year ended August 31, 20102011 differs from the result which would be obtained by applying the statutory income tax rate of 35%34% to income before income taxes because, (i)the Company has recorded a valuation allowance in the amount of the change in the deferred tax asset for each period, and (ii) the Company has $249,000$3,412,000 of non-deductible stock compensation expense for the year ended August 31, 2010.2011.

The table below presents a reconciliation of the tax at the prevailing statutory rate to the Company’s provision for taxes:

  Year ended August 31, 
  2010  2009 
Net operating loss $190,000  $44,000 
Less:Non-deductible stock compensation  (85,000)  - 
Change in valuation allowance  (105,000)  (44,000)
         
Tax provision $-  $- 
45

NOTE 6– INCOME TAXES (continued)
 
  Year ended August 31, 
  2011  2010 
Net operating loss $2,386,000  $190,000 
Less: Non-deductible stock compensation  (1,160,000)  (85,000)
Change in valuation allowance  (1,226,000)  (105,000)
         
Tax provision $-  $- 

The Company’s net operating loss carry forwards expire beginning in 2022.

NOTE 7 –7– SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Capital Stock

The Company isCompany’s authorized to issue 110,000,000 shares of capital stock consists of which 100,000,000 shares of capital stock are designated as common stock, with a par value of $0.01 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of capital stock are designated as preferred stockshares with a par value of $0.001 per share.  As of August 31, 2010, there were 23,670,260 shares of our common stock outstanding.  

All shares of common stock have equal voting rights and, when validly issued and outstanding, are entitled to one non-cumulative vote per share in all matters to be voted upon by shareholders.  The shares of common stock have no pre-emptive, subscription, conversion or redemption rights and may be issued only as fully paid and non-assessable shares. Holders of the common stock are entitled to equal ratable rights to dividends and distributions with respect to the common stock, as may be declared by the Board of Directors out of funds legally available.  In the event of a liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the affairs of the Company, the holders of common stock are entitled to share ratably in all assets remaining available for distribution  to them after payment or provision for all liabilities and any preferential liquidation rights of any preferred stock then outstanding.

InThe Company received cash proceeds from the sale of its common stock and the exercise of Class A Warrants and Class B Warrants to purchase common stock during the years ended August 31, 2011 and 2010 the Company granted 61,000as follows:

DescriptionShares of Common Stock IssuedCash Proceeds Received
2009-2010 Private Placement (issuances occurred in quarter ended November 30, 2010) (1)
 
1,132,500
 
$453,000
Exercise of Class A & B Warrants issued in connection with 2009 – 2010 Private Placement (1)
 
1,236,250
 
715,937
January 2011 Private Placement (issuance occurred in quarter ended February 28, 2011) (2)
 
1,600,000
 
4,000,000
Exercise of options issued in January 2011 Private Placement6,240,00015,600,000
Net offering costs-(1,655,150)
Total shares of common stock issued and net cash proceeds received from sale of common stock and from the exercise of Warrants during the twelve months(3)
 
10,208,750
 
$19,113,787
(1) See “2009-2010 Private Placement” below.
(2) See “January 2011 Private Placement” below.
(3) Does not include shares of common stock at a value of $0.75 per share as paymentissued for services to two external consultants.  As ofrendered during the twelve months ended August 31, 2010, these shares have not been issued and are included in Additional Paid-in Capital (APIC).  These shares were issued in September and October 2010.2011.  See “Other Equity Issues” below.

In December 2009 the Company granted 300,000 shares of common stock at a value of $0.83 per share as compensation to a director of the Company.  As of August 31, 2010 these shares have not been issued and are included in APIC.  These shares were issued in September 2010.Private Placement

-39-

InBetween October 2009 and November 2009, the Company issued 15,000 shares of common stock at a value of $0.90 per share as payment to a vendor for certain services rendered.

For the year ended August 31, 2010, the Company raised $400,000cash proceeds of $905,500 through the issuance of 1,000,0002,263,750 shares of common stock and the issuance of Class A Warrants to purchase 1,000,0002,263,750 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants to purchase 500,0001,131,875 shares of common stock.  Of the $905,500 cash proceeds raised for this private placement, $452,500 was raised prior to September 1, 2010 and $453,000,
46

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

representing the sale of 1,132,500 shares of common stock, (the “2009-2010was raised in September through November 2010. The final closing of this private placement was January 10, 2011.

During the year ended August 2011, the Company issued 131,250 shares to two investors in connection with our 2009 – 2010 Private Placement”Placement that were paid for in a prior period.

During the year ended August 2011, Class A Warrants to purchase 845,000 shares of the Company’s common stock and Class B warrants to purchase 391,250 shares of the Company’s common stock were exercised, resulting in $422,500 of proceeds being raised by the Company for the Class A warrants and $293,437 of proceeds being raised by the Company for the Class B Warrants.  Total proceeds to the Company as a result of the Class A and Class B Warrant exercise was $715,937.  

January 2011 Private Placement

Between January and February 2011, we entered into a series of transactions with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 1,600,000 shares of our common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 1,600,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $4,000,000. The Company has determined these warrants to have an approximate relative fair value of $4,640,000. The Company paid cash commissions of $318,000 and issued five year warrants to purchase up to 305,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share in

connection with the sale of its securities in the January 2011 Private Placement. The Company has determined these warrants to have an approximate fair value of $887,000. The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 1,600,000 and 305,000 warrants issued during the period, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 404%, and an expected life of 5 years.  The Company paid $65,150 in legal fees associated with the issuance of the shares associated with the January 2011 Private Placement.

In May and June 2011, certain investors participating in the January 2011 Private Placement exercised their options to purchase 6,240,000 shares of common stock resulting in gross proceeds to the Company in the amount of $15,600,000.  These investors were also issued five-year warrants to purchase up to 6,240,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share.  The Company has determined these warrants to have an approximate relative fair value of $7,800,000. The Company paid a sales commission of $1,337,150 in cash and issued a five-year warrant to purchase up to 1,192,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share in connection with the exercise of these placement warrants.The Company has determined these warrants to have an approximate fair value of $2,980,000. The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 6,240,000 and 1,192,000 warrants issued during the period, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 380%, and an expected life of 5 years.

Other Equity Issues

On June 27, 2011, the Company’s registration statement registering the resale of 8,908,125 shares of its common stock, which consists of (i) 4,738,750 shares of common stock, (ii) an aggregate of 1,336,250 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Class A Warrants, (iii) an aggregate of 678,125 shares of common stock issuable upon exercise of Class B Warrants, (iv) an aggregate of 250,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of options exercisable at $5.00 per share, and (v) 1,905,000 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of warrants exercisable at $2.50 per share issued in the January 2011 private placement, was deemed effective by the SEC.

47

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

In September 2010, the Company issued 300,000 common shares to a director for compensation recorded in the prior year at a fair value on the date of grant of $249,000.

During the quarter ended November 30, 2010, the Company issued 61,000 shares of common stock to two external consultants as payment for services performed in a prior period.

In November 2010, the Company entered into a non-exclusive investment banking agreement with Sunrise Securities Corp. (“Sunrise”).  Also during pursuant to which it agreed to pay a sales commission with respect to certain financings effected, or alternative transactions entered into, by the Company through introductions by Sunrise.  The Company agreed to pay Sunrise a monthly fee of 5,000 shares of restricted common stock beginning in November 2010.  The Company has issued 50,000 shares totaling $96,150 of expense for the year ended August 31, 2011 related to this fee.

In November 2010, the Company received $52,500 proceeds,also entered into a 24 month institutional public relations retainer agreement with Sunrise Financial Group, Inc., (“SFG”), an affiliate of Sunrise, pursuant to which it agreed to issue SFG five-year options to purchase 250,000 shares at $1.60 per share and 250,000 shares at $5.00 per share, with certain demand registration rights.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 500,000 options, assuming a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 425%, and an expected life of 5 years.  The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $960,000, which was recognized as subscriptions relatedan immediate expense during the nine months ended May 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50-25.

In January 2011, we entered into a finders agreement with Aspenwood Capital (“Aspenwood”) under which Aspenwood would introduce potential investors to the 2009-2010 Private Placement, for 118,750Company.  The Company agreed to pay up to a 10% cash fee and to issue a five year warrant to purchase up to 10% of the number of shares sold to investors introduced to the Company by Aspenwood at an exercise price equal to 100% of the equity purchase price.  The warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time subsequent to August 31, 2011 in the event the Company does not maintain an effective registration statement on file with the SEC.  The Company has paid $25,000 under this agreement.

In May 2011, the Company entered into an agreement with an investor relations firm that the Company subsequently terminated in July 2011.  In connection with the agreement, the investor relations firm had received $15,575 cash and a warrant to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock Class A Warrantsat an exercise price of $3.75 per share vesting over twelve months.  Upon termination of the agreement, the investor relations firm agreed to accept a vested warrant to purchase 137,500only 33,334 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $3.75 per share and Class B Warrantsno future cash payments. The remaining 166,666 warrants were cancelled in conjunction with the termination of the agreement.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 33,334 options, assuming a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 385%, and an expected life of 90 days.  The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $125,000, which was recognized as an immediate expense for the year ended August 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 505-50-25.

In June 2011, Sunrise Financial Group exercised a warrant to purchase 59,375250,000 shares on a cashless basis resulting in the issuance of 175,000 shares of common stock.

Amended 2008 Stock Option Plan issuances

In February 2011, the Company entered into a Director’s agreement with General Gregory Martin pursuant to which the Company issued to General Martin 5-year options to purchase 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.50 per share as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 60,000 options issued during the period to this director, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 421%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $150,000.  General Martin’s award immediately vests on the grant date and were
48

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

awarded for services as a nonemployee director acting in his role as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, the Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year ended August 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

In March 2011, the Company granted to Wm Chris Mathers, its chief financial officer, as a part of his employment arrangement, a five year option to purchase up to 400,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.  These options vest 1/36 each month provided he is employed by the Company on the vesting dates.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 400,000 options issued during the period, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 376%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $1,000,000.  Since Mr. Mathers’ award vests over a 36 month period, the Company is expensing approximately $28,000 monthly for this award over the 36 month vesting period in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

In March 2011, the Company entered into a Director’s agreement with Graham Karklin pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Karklin a 5-year option to purchase 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.50 per share as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 60,000 options issued during the period to this director, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 325%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $150,000.  Mr. Karklin’s award immediately vests on the grant date and were awarded for services as a nonemployee director acting in his role as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, the Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year endedAugust 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

In March 2011, the Company issued Anthony Marchese a 5-year option to purchase 150,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.50 per share as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 150,000 options issued during the period to this director, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 323%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $375,000.  Mr. Marchese’s award immediately vests on the grant date and were awarded for services as a nonemployee director acting in his role as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, the Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year endedAugust 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

In April 2011, the Company issued Cecil Wall a 5-year option to purchase 90,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $4.70 per share as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 90,000 options issued during the period to this director, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 325%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $423,000.  The Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year endedAugust 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

In April 2011, the Company entered into a Director’s agreement with Jim Graham pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Graham a 5-year option to purchase 60,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $4.00 per share as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 60,000 options issued during the period to this director, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 322%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $240,000.  Mr. Graham’s award immediately vests on the grant date and were awarded for services as a nonemployee director acting in his role as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, the Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year endedAugust 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

49

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

In May 2011, the Company issued Anthony Marchese a 5-year option to purchase 175,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $4.15 per share as compensation for his appointment as non-executive Chairman of the Company’s board of directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 175,000 options issued during the period to this director, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 324%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $726,000.  Mr. Marchese’s award immediately vests on the grant date and were awarded for services as a nonemployee director acting in his role as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, the Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year ended August 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.
In May 2011, the Company granted to K. Marc LeVier, its chief executive officer, as a part of his employment arrangement, a five year option to purchase up to 2,500,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.  These options vest 1/36 each month provided he is employed by the Company on the vesting dates.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 2,500,000 options issued during the period, using theassumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 376%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $6,250,000.  Since Mr. LeVier’s award vests over a 36 month period, the Company is expensing approximately $174,000 monthly for this award over the 36 month vesting period in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

In July 2011, the Company issued 3.5 year options to purchase a total of 180,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at $2.60 per share as compensation to four independent directors for their service on select committees of the Board of Directors.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 180,000 options issued during the period to these directors, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 372%, and an expected life of 3.5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $468,000.  These awards immediately vest on the grant date and were awarded for services as a nonemployee director acting in his role as a member of the board of directors. Therefore, the Company has recorded the entire amount of this award on the grant date as an immediate expense for the year endedAugust 31, 2011 in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

On August 19, 2011, the Company granted to Anthony Garcia, itsSenior Vice-President of Development, as a part of his employment arrangement, a five year option to purchase up to 750,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $1.85 per share.  These options vest 1/36 each month provided he is employed by the Company on the vesting dates.  The Black-Scholes pricing model was used to estimate the fair value of the 750,000 options issued during the period, using the assumptions of a risk free interest rate of 1.1%, dividend yield of 0%, volatility of 361%, and an expected life of 5 years. The Company has determined these options to have an approximate fair value of $1,387,000.  Since Mr. Garcia’s award vests over a 36 month period, the Company is expensing approximately $38,500 monthly, beginning in September 2011, for this award over the 36 month vesting period in accordance with FASB ASC 718.

Warrants

The fair value of the warrants issued with the unitsour 2009 – 2010 Private Placement was estimated at the date of issue using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and the relative fair value of the Class A Warrants, Class B Warrants, and shares of common stock issued during the twelve months ended August 31, 2010 as part of the units was $0.82, $0.84, and $0.85, respectively.  The Company recorded the relative fair value of the warrants of $269,978 as APIC.additional paid-in capital (“APIC”).

50

NOTE 7 – SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (Continued)

The assumptions used are as follows:
  August 31, 2010 August 31, 2009 
Expected dividend yield  0%  N/A 
Risk-free interest rate  0.340%-0.815%  N/A 
Expected volatility  387.97%-406.46%  N/A 
Expected warrant life (in years)  1.00-1.50  N/A 

The following Class A Warrants are outstanding:

Expiry Date 
Exercise
Price
  August 31, 2010  August 31, 2009  Exercise Price  August 31, 2011  August 31, 2010 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A  $0.50   1,418,750   2,263,750 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   125,000   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   187,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   75,000   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.50   125,000   N/A 
      1,137,500     

The following Class B Warrants are outstanding:

 Exercise       
Expiry Date Price  August 31, 2010  August 31, 2009  Exercise Price  August 31, 2010  August 31, 2010 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A  $0.75   740,625   1,131,875 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   62,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   93,750   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   37,500   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75  ��31,250   N/A 
December 31, 2011 $0.75   62,500   N/A 
      568,750     

-40-

Stock-based CompensationThe fair value of the 1,600,000 warrants issued in January 2011 with our 2011 Private Placement was estimated at the date of issue using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Company recorded the relative fair value of the warrants of $4,640,000 as APIC.

InThe assumptions used are as follows:
August 31, 2011August 31, 2010
Expected dividend yield0%N/A
Risk-free interest rate1.1%N/A
Expected volatility404%N/A
Expected warrant life (in years)5.00N/A

The following January 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Anthony Marchese pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Marchese 300,000 shares of common stock as compensation for serving as a member2011 Warrants are outstanding:

Expiry Date Exercise Price  August 31, 2011  August 31, 2010 
January 31, 2016 $2.50   1,600,000   N/A 

The fair value of the Company’s board of directors.  In October 2009, as a part of6,240,000 Option Warrants issued in May and June with our 2009-20102011 Private Placement was estimated at the date of issue using the Black-Scholes valuation model. The Company sold Mr. Marchese, currently a director, 62,500 sharesrecorded the relative fair value of common stock, Class A Warrants to purchase up to 62,500 sharesthe warrants of common stock, and Class B Warrants to purchase up to 31,250 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $25,000, the terms of which were identical to those offered to other investors.  In October 2009,$7,800,000 as a part of our 2009-2010 Private Placement, the Company sold Insiders Trend Fund, LP, an affiliate of Mr. Marchese, 125,000 shares of common stock, Class A Warrants to purchase up to 125,000 shares of common stock, and Class B Warrants to purchase up to 62,500 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $50,000, the terms of which were identical to those offered to other investors.APIC.

The assumptions used are as follows:
August 31, 2011August 31, 2010
Expected dividend yield0%N/A
Risk-free interest rate1.1%N/A
Expected volatility380%N/A
Expected warrant life (in years)5.00N/A

The following January 2011 Option Warrants are outstanding:

Expiry Date Exercise Price  August 31, 2011  August 31, 2010 
June 30, 2016 $2.50   6,240,000   N/A 

NOTE 8 –8– SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

BetweenIn September and November 2010,October of 2011 we issued Sunrise Securities Group the Company raised $453,000 through the issuance of 1,132,500final 10,000 shares of common stock and the issuance of Class A Warrants to purchase 1,132,500 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants to purchase 566,250 shares ofour restricted common stock as part of our 2009-2010 Private Placement.  Between December 2010 and Januaryrequired under the non-exclusive investment banking agreement.

In September 2011, Class A Warrants to purchase 437,500 shares16,250 of the Company’s common stock were exercised and Class B Warrants to purchase 218,750 shares were exercised,by an investor, resulting in $382,813$8,125 of proceeds being raised by the Company.

In January 2011, we entered into a series of transactions with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 800,000 shares of our common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $2,000,000 (“January 2011 Private Placement”).  As additional consideration for the purchase of the shares and warrants, the Company issued to the January 2011 Private Placement investors an option for 120 days to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at $2.50 per share with 100% warrant coverage through the issuance of warrants to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.  The Company paid cash commissions of $208,000 and issued five year warrants to purchase up to 169,000 shares of its common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share in connection with the sale of its securities in the January 2011 Private Placement.  We have agreed to register the resale of the 169,000 shares of common stock underlying the warrant issued as payment of commissions.

In connection with the 2009-2010 Private Placement, the Company also entered into certain registration rights agreements.  Under the registration rights agreements, the Company is required to file a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying the warrants by February 9, 2011, and the registration is required to be deemed effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) on or before the 150th calendar day after the filing of such registration statement.  In the event these milestones are not met by the Company, the Company is obligated to issue, as liquidated damages on a pro-rata basis to these investors, approximately 290,000 shares for each month, or pro-rated for a peri od less than one month, the registration is late up to a maximum of approximately 1,450,000 shares.  In connection with the January 2011 Private Placement, we have granted the same demand registration rights with respect to the 800,000 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock.  If a registration statement is not filed with the SEC on or before February 9, 2011, or if such registration statement is not deemed effective by the SEC on or before the 150th calendar day after the filing of the registration statement, the Company has agreed to make pro rata payments to the investors, as liquidated damages, a number of shares of Company common stock equal to ten percent of the shares of common stock purchased by the respective investors and issued upon the exercise of the warrants for each 30-day period or pro rata for any portion thereof for which no registration statem ent has been filed or has not been declared effective by the SEC, as the case may be, provided that such amount shall not exceed five times the liquidated damages amount. There can be no assurance that the Company’s registration statement will be effective within 150 days after February 9, 2011.

 
-41-51

 
In November 2010, the Company entered into a non-exclusive investment banking agreement with Sunrise Securities Corp. pursuant to which it agreed to pay a sales commission with respect to certain financings effected, or alternative transactions entered into, by the Company through introductions by Sunrise.  The Company agreed to pay Sunrise a monthly fee of 5,000 shares of restricted stock.  The Company concurrently entered into a 24 month institutional public relations retainer agreement with Sunrise pursuant to which it agreed to issue Sunrise five-year options to purchase 250,000 shares at $1.60 per share and 250,000 shares at $5.00 per share, with certain demand registration rights.

In November 2010, as a part of our 2009-2010 Private Placement, the Company sold RLR Services Partnership, a five percent shareholder, 37,500 shares of common stock, Class A Warrants to purchase up to 37,500 shares of common stock, and Class B Warrants to purchase up to 18,750 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $15,000, the terms of which were identical to those offered to other investors.

In December 2010, the Company hired a new Chief Financial Officer.

In December 2010, the principal and accrued interest for the advances to certain officers was paid in full.

In January 2011, we entered into a finders agreement with Aspenwood Capital (“Aspenwood”) under which Aspenwood would introduce potential investors to the Company.  The Company agreed to pay Aspenwood up to a 10% cash fee and to issue a five year warrant to purchase shares of common stock in an amount up to 10% of the number of shares sold to investors introduced to the Company by Aspenwood.  The exercise price of the warrants will be equal to 125% of the equity purchase price.  The warrant may be exercised on a cashless basis at any time subsequent to August 31, 2011 in the event the Company does not maintain an effective registration statement on file with the SEC.

ItemITEM 9.  Changes In and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial DisclosureCHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.
 
ItemITEM 9A.  Controls and ProceduresCONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Management’s Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

DisclosureAt the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2011, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”), of the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation the CEO and the CFO have been designed to ensureconcluded that as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by us in reports that we file or submit to the CompanySEC under the Exchange Act is collectedrecorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosures.  The Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded, based on their evaluation as of August 31, 2010 that, as a result of the material weaknesses described below, disclosure controls and procedures were ineffective in providing reasonable assurance that material information is made known to them by others within the Company.disclosure.

-42-

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Internal control over financial reporting is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and Rule 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act as a process designed by, or under the supervision of, our principal executive and principal financial officers and effected by our Board of Directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).  Management has assessed the effectiveness ofprinciples. Our internal control over financial reporting basedincludes those policies and procedures that:

·  pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of our assets;

·  provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that our receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and directors; and

·  provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detections of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of August 31, 2011. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria set forth in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in  Internal Control-Integrated Framework(COSO). A material weakness, as defined by SEC rules, is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a materi al misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detectedBased on a timely basis. The material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting that were identified are:  

a)      We did not maintain sufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of GAAP commensurate with our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements. We have limited experience in the areas of financial reporting and disclosure controls and procedures.  Also, we do not have an independent audit committee.  As a result, there is a lack of monitoring of the financial reporting process and there is a reasonable possibility that material misstatements of the consolidated financial statements, including disclosures, will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis; and

b)      Due to our small size, we do not have a proper segregation of duties in certain areas of our financial reporting process.  The areas whereassessment, we have a lack of segregation of duties include cash receipts and disbursements, approval of purchases and approval of accounts payable invoices for payment. This control deficiency, which is pervasive in nature, results in a reasonable possibilityconcluded that, material misstatements of the financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

As a result of the existence of these material weaknesses as of August 31, 2010, management has concluded that we did not maintain effective2011, our internal controlcontrols over financial reporting as of August 31, 2010,were effective based on the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizationsthose criteria.

Attestation Report of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in  Internal Control-Integrated Framework.  Registered Public Accounting Firm

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our independent registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rulesSection 404(c) of the SECSarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, as amended, which provides that permitissuers that are not an “accelerated filer” or “large accelerated filer” are exempt from the companyrequirement to provide only management's report in this annualan auditor attestation report.

52

Changes to Internal Controls and ProceduresControl over Financial Reporting

OurThere have been changes in our internal control over financial reporting hasduring the year ended August 31, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

Our internal controls over financial reporting have been modified during our most recent fiscal year by adding a Chief Financial Officer and additional advisors to address deficienciescontract accounting personnel in the financial closing, review and analysis process, which has improved our internal control over financial reporting.  On December 1, 2010 we hired a new Chief Financial Officer to further strengthen our internal controls.

Management’s Remediation Plans

We will look to increase our personnel resources and technical accounting expertise within the accounting function as funds become available.  Management believes that hiring additional knowledgeable personnel with technical accounting expertise will remedy the following material weakness: insufficient personnel with an appropriate level of technical accounting knowledge, experience, and training in the application of GAAP commensurate with our complexity and our financial accounting and reporting requirements.process.
 
ItemITEM 9B.  Other InformationOTHER INFORMATION
 
Between September 2009 and November 2010, the Company raised $905,500 through the issuance of 2,263,750 shares of common stock and the issuance of Class A Warrants to purchase 2,263,750 shares of common stock and Class B Warrants to purchase 1,131,875 shares of common stock as part of our 2009-2010 Private Placement.  Between December 2010 and January 2011, Class A Warrants to purchase 437,500 shares were exercised, and Class B Warrants to purchase 218,750 shares were exercised, resulting in $382,813 of proceeds being raised by the Company.  The final closing of this private placement was January 10, 2011.None.

In January 2011, we entered into a series of transactions with accredited investors pursuant to which we sold an aggregate of 800,000 shares of our common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock, exercisable at $2.50 per share, for gross proceeds of $2,000,000 (“January 2011 Private Placement”).  As additional consideration for the purchase of the shares and warrants, the Company issued to the January 2011 investors an option for 120 days to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at $2.50 per share with 100% warrant coverage through the issuance of warrants to purchase up to 3,200,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.  The Company paid cash commissions of $208,000 and issued five year warrants to purchase up to 169,000 shares of its comm on stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share in connection with the sale of its securities in the January 2011 Private Placement.  We have agreed to register the resale of the 169,000 shares of common stock underlying the warrant issued as payment of commissions.

 
-43-53

 
In connection with the 2009-2010 Private Placement, the Company also entered into certain registration rights agreements.  Under the registration rights agreements, the Company is required to file a registration statement covering the resale of the shares of common stock and shares of common stock underlying the warrants by February 9, 2011, and the registration is required to be deemed effective by the SEC on or before the 150th calendar day after the filing of such registration statement.  In the event these milestones are not met by the Company, the Company is obligated to issue, as liquidated damages on a pro-rata basis to these investors, approximately 290,000 shares for each month, or pro-rated for a period less than one month, the registrat ion is late up to a maximum of approximately 1,450,000 shares. In connection with the January 2011 Private Placement, we have granted the same demand registration rights with respect to the 800,000 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 800,000 shares of common stock.  If a registration statement is not filed with the SEC on or before February 9, 2011, or if such registration statement is not deemed effective by the SEC on or before the 150th calendar day after the filing of the registration statement, the Company has agreed to make pro rata payments to the investors, as liquidated damages, a number of shares of Company common stock equal to ten percent of the shares of common stock purchased by the respective investors and issued upon the exercise of the warrants for each 30-day period or pro rata for any portion thereof for which no registration statement has been filed or has not been declared effe ctive by the SEC, as the case may be, provided that such amount shall not exceed five times the liquidated damages amount. There can be no assurance that the Company’s registration statement will be effective within 150 days after February 9, 2011.

The sales described above were made pursuant to the exemption from registration contained in to Section 4(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 as privately negotiated, isolated, non-recurring transactions not involving any public offer or solicitation. Each purchaser represented that such purchaser’s intention to acquire the shares for investment only and not with a view toward distribution. We requested our stock transfer agent to affix appropriate legends to the stock certificate issued to each purchaser and the transfer agent affixed the appropriate legends. Each purchaser was given adequate access to sufficient information about us to make an informed investment decision. Except as described above, no underwriting discounts, commissions, or finder’s fees were involved.

In December 2009, we expanded our board of directors from three to four members and appointed Anthony Marchese as a director to fill the vacancy.  Since May 2003, Mr. Marchese, 53, has served as president and chief operating officer of Monarch Capital Group LLC, a New York City based FINRA member broker/dealer.  Mr. Marchese also serves as the general partner and chief investment officer of the Insiders Trend Fund, LP, an investment partnership whose mandate is to invest in those public companies whose officers and/or directors have been active acquirers of their own stock.  Mr. Marchese’s prior experience includes Laidlaw Equities, Southcoast Capital, Oppenheimer & Co, Prudential-Bache and the General Motors Corporation.  Mr. Marchese served in the military with the Army Security Agen cy and the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.  Mr. Marchese attended Boston University and received an MBA in Finance from the University of Chicago.  Mr. Marchese provides the Board with exceptional leadership and management knowledge, having gained extensive management and corporate finance experience during the course of his career. Mr. Marchese’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills described above led the Board to conclude that Mr. Marchese should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

In January 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Anthony Marchese pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Marchese 300,000 shares of common stock as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.

-44-

PART III
 
ItemITEM 10. Directors, Executive Officers, and Corporate Governance
Management and Board of Directors
Our current executive officers and directors are:

NameAgePositionPositions Held Since
Daniel E. Gorski72Director, Chief Executive Officer, and PresidentJanuary 2007
Chris Mathers51Chief Financial OfficerDecember 2010
G.W. (Mike) McDonald74Director and Vice PresidentJanuary 2004
Cecil C. Wall78Director, Secretary & TreasurerJanuary 2004
Stanley Korzeb56Vice PresidentJanuary 2007
Anthony Marchese53DirectorDecember 2009

Daniel E. Gorski.  Mr. Gorski has severed as president and director of the Company since January 2007.  From July 2004 to January 2006, Mr. Gorski was the co-founder and vice president of operations for High Plains Uranium Inc., a uranium exploration and development company that went public on the Toronto Stock Exchange in December 2005.  Between June 1996 through May 2004, Mr. Gorski served as an officer and director of Metalline Mining Co., a publicly traded mining and development company with holdings in the Sierra Mojada Mining District, Coahuila, Mexico.  From January 1992 to June 1996, Mr. Gorski was the exploration geologist under contract to USMX Inc. and worked exclusively in Latin America.  Mr. Gorski earned a BS in 1960 from Sul Ross State College, in Alpine, Texas and an MA in 1970 from the University of Texas in Austin, Texas.  Mr. Gorski has over thirty-five years of experience in the mining industry.  Mr. Gorski’s extensive technical knowledge and experience in the mining industry led the Board to conclude that Mr. Gorski should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Chris Mathers. Mr. Mathers was appointed as the Company’s chief financial officer in December 2010.  From 2000 through 2010, Mr. Mathers was involved in providing contract chief financial officer and consulting services to a wide variety of privately and publicly held companies.  From 1993 through 1999 Mr. Mathers served as CFO to InterSystems, Inc. (AMEX:II). Mr. Mathers began his career in public accounting with the international accounting firm of PriceWaterhouse.  Mr. Mathers holds a BBA in accounting from Southwestern University located in Georgetown, Texas, and is also a certified public accountant.

Mike McDonald.  Mr. McDonald has served as the Company’s vice president and director since January 2004, and as chief financial officer from January 2004 to November 2010.  From 1994 and to the present, Mr. McDonald has been involved with various oil and gas companies and related investments.  In 1980, he founded the oil and gas exploration company, Roseland Oil & Gas, Inc. and served as its president until 1987.  From 1975 to 1980, Mr. McDonald was employed with Exxon.  Mr. McDonald received his B.S. Degree in Geology in 1955 from Sul Ross University in Alpine, Texas.  Mr. McDonald’s extensive management experience led the Board to conclude that Mr. McDonald should serve as a member of the Board of Direc tors.

Cecil C. Wall.  Mr. Wall has served as the Company’s secretary and treasurer and director since January 2004.  Mr. Wall has served as vice president and director for Brenex Oil Corporation, an oil and gas producing company located in St. George, Utah, since April 1998.  Since 1969, Mr. Wall has been engaged in oil and gas and his businesses.  Mr. Wall attended Utah State University, in Logan, Utah from 1951 to 1952.  Mr. Wall’s management experience led the Board to conclude that Mr. Wall should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Stanley Korzeb.  Mr. Korzeb has served as the Company’s vice president since January 2007.  From May 2006 to November 2006, Mr. Korzeb served as exploration geologist for Teck Cominco of the Pend Oreille Mine in Metalline Falls, Washington.  From February 2004 to December 2005, Mr. Korzeb was the chief geologist for Metalline Mining Company in Coeur  D’ Alene, Idaho.  From September 1980 to February 1996, Mr. Korzeb was employed by the U.S. Bureau of Mines as a Geologist in Denver, Colorado.  Mr. Korzeb received a Master of Science in Geology in 1977 from Miami University in Oxford, Ohio, and a BS in Geology from the University of Massachusetts in 1975.DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
 
-45-

Anthony Marchese.  Mr. Marchese has served as a director since December 2009.  Since May 2003, Mr. Marchese has served as president and chief operating officer of Monarch Capital Group LLC, a New York City based FINRA member broker/dealer.  Mr. Marchese also serves asThe information required by this Item will be included under the general partner and chief investment officer of the Insiders Trend Fund, LP, an investment partnership whose mandate is to invest in those public companies whose officers and/or directors have been active acquirers of their own stock.  Mr. Marchese’s prior experience includes Laidlaw Equities, Southcoast Capital, Oppenheimer & Co, Prudential-Bache and the General Motors Corporation.  Mr. Marchese served in the military with the Army Security Agency and the U.S. Army Intelligence and Security Command.  Mr. Marchese attended Boston University and received an MBA in Finance from the University of Chicago.  Mr. Marchese provides the Board with exceptional leadership and management knowledge, having gained extensive management and corporate finance experience during the course of his career. Mr. Marchese’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills described above led the Board to conclude that Mr. Marchese should serve as a member of the Board of Directors.

Voting Agreement for Director Nominee
              In connection with the January 2011 financing,section entitled “Information on the Board of Directors agreedand Executive Officers” in our definitive proxy statement to nominate, and appoint as a director, a nominee of Highline Capital Partners, L.P., Highline Capital International, Ltd., Highline Capital Partners, QP, LP, and Highline A Master Fund, L.L.C., and a majority of our shareholders (Messrs. Gorski and McDonald, Brewer & Pritchard, P.C., and RLR Services Partnership) agreed for a period of one year to vote for such nominee as a director. This voting agreement is for a period of one year, and as of the date of this prospectus, no such nominee has been designed.

Committees of the Board & Director Independence
Our board of directors is currently composed of four directors, with Mr. Marchese being the only director that would qualify as independent director based on the definition of independent director set forth in Section 240.10A-3 of the Securities Act.  We are not subject to corporate governance rules that require that a board of directors be composed of a majority of independent directors.  The Board has not established any committees and, accordingly, the Board serves as the audit, compensation, and nomination committee, and we have no audit committee financial expert.

There have been no changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees to the Board of Directors.

Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance

Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, requires our executive officers and directors, and persons who beneficially own more than 10% of our common stock, to file initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership with the SEC.  Executive officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.  To the Company’s knowledge, based solely on a review of the copies of such reports furnished to the Company and written representations that no other reports were required, as of the date of this report, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors and greater than ten percent beneficial owners are complied with except for: Dan Gorski, a director, executive offi cer and greater than 10% holder of our common stock failed to file a Form 3 in December 2008; Mike McDonald, a director, executive officer and greater than 10% holder of our common stock failed to file a Form 3 in December 2008; Brewer & Pritchard, PC, a greater than 10% holder of our common stock, failed to file a Form 3 in December 2008; RLR Partnership, a greater than 10% holder of our common stock, failed to file a Form 3 in December 2008; Cecil Wall, a director, failed to file a Form 3 in December 2008; Stanley Korzeb, an executive officer, failed to file a Form 3 in December 2008; Anthony Marchese, a director, failed to file a Form 3 in December 2009; and Wm Chris Mathers, an executive officer, failed to file a Form 3 in December 2010.

-46-

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a code of ethics which applies to all our directors, officers and employees. A copy of our “Code of Ethics” was filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission as Exhibit 14.1pursuant to ourRegulation 14A in connection with the 2011 annual meeting of shareholders (the “Proxy Statement”), which information is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report on Form 10-K10-K.
The Company's Code of Business and Ethical Conduct can be found on the Company's internet website located at www.trer.com under the heading "Corporate". Any stockholder may request a printed copy of such materials by submitting a written request to the Company's Corporate Secretary. If the Company amends the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct or grants a waiver, including an implicit waiver, from the Code of Business and Ethical Conduct, the Company will disclose the information on its internet website. The waiver information will remain on the website for at least twelve months after the year ended August 31, 2008.initial disclosure of such waiver.

Item 11.Executive CompensationITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Summary Compensation Table

The following table contains compensation data for our named executive officers forinformation required by this Item will be included under the last two completed fiscal years ended August 31, 2010section entitled “Executive Compensation” in the Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and 2009.

Summary Compensation Table
Name and
Principal
PositionExchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, which information is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Year
Salary
And Consulting
Payments
($)
Bonus
($)
Stock
Awards
($)
All Other Compensation
($)
Total
($)
Daniel E. Gorski2010----------
President, and CEO2009----------
G.W. McDonald2010----------
Vice President and CFO2009----------

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The Company has a stock option plan in which it has reserved two million shares.  No securities or options were issued pursuant to this plan during fiscal 2010 and 2009.  No options have been issued to the named executive officers under this plan or any other plan.

Employment Agreements

The Company has not entered into any employment agreements.

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation

The Company does not offer nonqualified deferred compensation to any of its named executive officers.

Potential Payments upon Termination or Change-in-Control

The Company does not offer any payment to any of its named executive officers following or in connection with any termination, resignation, severance, retirement, change in control, change in the named executive officer’s responsibilities, or any other similar event.

Director Compensation

No compensation was paid to any director during fiscal 2010 or 2009, except as set forth below:

Name
Fees Paid
In Cash
($)
Stock
Awards
($)
Total
Anthony Marchese
249,000(1)
$249,000

(1)  In January 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Anthony Marchese pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Marchese 300,000 shares of common stock as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  These shares were valued at $0.83 per share.

-47-

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

The Company does not have a compensation committee, and therefore such role is assumed by the entire board of directors.  None of the Company’s executive officers serves on the board of directors or compensation committee of a company that has an executive officer that serves on the Company’s board of directors.  No member of the Company’s board of directors is an executive officer of a company in which one of the Company’s executive officers serves as a member of the board of directors or compensation committee of that company.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
The information required by this Item 12.  Securitywill be included under the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

The following table sets forth, as of January 31, 2011,Management” in the number and percentage of outstanding shares of common stock owned by: (a) each person who is known by usProxy Statement to be filed with the beneficial owner of more than 5% of our outstanding shares of common stock; (b) each of our directors; (c) the named executive officers;Securities and (d) all current directors and executive officers, as a group.  As of January 31, 2011, there were 26,781,259 shares of common stock issued and outstanding.

Beneficial ownership has been determined in accordance with Rule 13d-3 under the Exchange Act.  Under this rule, certain shares may be deemedCommission pursuant to be beneficially owned by more than one person (if, for example, persons share the power to vote or the power to dispose of the shares).  In addition, shares are deemed to be beneficially owned by a person if the person has the right to acquire shares (for example, upon exercise of an option or warrant) within 60 days of the date as ofRegulation 14A, which the information is provided. In computing the percentage ownership of any person, the amount of shares is deemed to include the amount of shares beneficially ownedincorporated by such person by reason of such acquisition rights.  As a result, the percentage of outstanding shares of any person as shown in the following table does not neces sarily reflect the person’s actual voting power at any particular date.  To our knowledge, except as indicated in the footnotesreference to this table and pursuant to applicable community property laws, the persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all shares of common stock shown as beneficially owned by them.  Except as set forth below, the address for each of the beneficial owners is 3 Riverway, Suite 1800, Houston, TX 77056.

Name and Address of Beneficial Owner
Number of Shares of Common Stock Beneficially Owned
Percent
Of Class Beneficially Owned
G.W. McDonald
1408 Roseland Blvd., Tyler, TX  75701
5,066,75018.9%
Daniel E. Gorski
7 Copana Pt., Rockport, TX  78382
4,800,00017.9%
Stanley Korzeb1,000,0003.7%
Cecil C. Wall600,0002.2%
Anthony Marchese
769,750(1)
2.9%
Chris Mathers----
All directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)12,236,50045.7%
Brewer & Pritchard, P.C.3,750,00014.0%
RLR Services Partnership
3,787,700(2)
14.1%
Highline Capital Partners, QP, LP(3)
One Rockefeller Center, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10020
1,524,648(4)
5.7%
Highline Capital Partners International Ltd.(5)
One Rockefeller Center, 30th Floor, New York, NY 10020
2,957,787(6)
11.0%
* Less than 1%.

(1)  Represents (i) the following securities registered in the name of Mr. Marchese (a) 362,500 shares of common stock, (b) 62,500 shares of common stock underlying Class A Warrants, and (c) 31,250 shares of common stock underlying Class B Warrants; and (ii) the following securities registered in the name of the Insiders Trend Fund, LP., an entity in which Mr. Marchese serves as general partner and chief investment officer (x) 125,500 shares of common stock, (y) 125,500 shares of common stock underlying Class A Warrants, and (z) 62,500 shares of common stock underlying Class B Warrants.
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
-48-

(2)  Tony Kamin has voting and investment control over the shares held by RLR Services Partnership.
(3)  Highline Capital Holdings, LLC (“Highline Capital”) serves as the general partner of the selling stockholder, and may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over the securities held by the selling stockholder.  Howard M. Singer serves as an executive officer of Highline Capital.
(4)  Represents (i) 153,092 shares of common stock, (ii) 146,820 shares of common stock underlying a five year warrant exercisable at $2.50 per share, (iii) 612,368 shares of common stock underlying an option exercisable at $2.50 per share, and (iv) 612,368 shares of common stock underlying a warrant issuable upon the exercise of an option.
(5)  Highline Capital Management, LLC (“Highline Management”) serves as the managing member of the selling stockholder, and may be deemed to have beneficial ownership over the securities held by the selling stockholder.  Howard M. Singer serves as an executive officer of Highline Management
(6)  Represents (i) 296,996 shares of common stock, (ii) 284,823 shares of common stock underlying a five year warrant exercisable at $2.50 per share, (iii) 1,187,984 shares of common stock underlying an option exercisable at $2.50 per share, and (iv) 1,187,984 shares of common stock underlying a warrant issuable upon the exercise of an option.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
The information required by this Item 13.  Certainwill be included under the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,Transactions” and Director Independence.“Corporate Governance Matters” in the Proxy Statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, which information is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
 
Other than as disclosed below, during the two fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and the subsequent interim period, there have been no transactions, or proposed transactions, which have materially affected or will materially affect us in which any director, executive officer or beneficial holder of more than 5% of the outstanding common or preferred stock, or any of their respective relatives, spouses, associates or affiliates, has had or will have any direct or material indirect interest. We have no policy regarding entering into transactions with affiliated parties.

Loans

During the fiscal year ending August 31, 2008, Mr. Gorski advanced $62,000 to the Company.    In July 2010, Mr. Gorski was paid $37,500 in reduction of the note.  In June 2010, the Company entered into an amended and restated note agreement with Mr. Gorski pursuant to which three promissory notes issued to Mr. Gorksi during 2009, having aggregate principal amount of $24,500 and accrued interest of $13,356, were renewed, extended, and consolidated.  In December 2010, all principal and interest due to Mr. McDonald was paid in full.

During the fiscal years ending August 31, 2008 and 2009, Mr. McDonald advanced $86,000 to the Company.   In July 2010, the Company paid Mr. McDonald $37,500.  In August 2010, the Company entered into an amended and restated note agreement with Mr. McDonald pursuant to which four promissory notes issued to Mr. McDonald and related parties during 2009, having an aggregate principal amount of $48,500 and accrued interest of $4,094, were renewed, extended, and consolidated.  In December 2010, all principal and interest due to Mr. McDonald was paid in full.

Issuance of Stock

In April 2007, the Company issued (i) each of Mr. Gorski and Mr. McDonald 4,800,000 shares of common stock for services rendered, (ii) Mr. Korzeb 1,000,000 shares of common stock for services rendered, and (iii) Mr. Wall 500,000 shares of common stock for services rendered.
-49-

In November 2008, the Company issued 3,750,000 shares of common stock for $25,000 cash to Brewer & Pritchard, PC, corporate counsel. In November 2008, the Company issued 3,750,000 shares of common stock for $25,000 cash to RLR Services Partnership

In January 2010, the Company entered into an agreement with Anthony Marchese pursuant to which the Company issued to Mr. Marchese 300,000 shares of common stock as compensation for serving as a member of the Company’s board of directors.  In October 2009, in connection with our private placement, the Company sold Mr. Marchese, a director, 62,500 shares of common stock, Class A Warrants to purchase up to 62,500 shares of common stock, and Class B Warrants to purchase up to 31,250 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $25,000, the terms of which were identical to those offered to other investors in the Company’s private placement.  In October 2009, in connection with our private placement, the Company sold Insiders Trend Fund, LP, an affiliate of Mr. Marchese,125,000 shares of common stock, Class A Warrants to purchase up to 125,000 shares of common stock, and Class B Warrants to purchase up to 62,500 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $50,000, the terms of which were identical to those offered to other investors in the Company’s private placement.

In November 2010, in connection with our private placement, the Company sold RLR Services Partnership, a five percent shareholder, 37,500 shares of common stock, Class A Warrants to purchase up to 37,500 shares of common stock, and Class B Warrants to purchase up to 18,750 shares of common stock for gross proceeds of $15,000, the terms of which were identical to those offered to other investors in the Company’s private placement.

In January 2011, we sold to Highline Capital Partners, L.P., Highline Capital International, Ltd., Highline Capital Partners, QP, LP, and Highline A Master Fund, L.L.C. an aggregate of 500,000 shares of common stock and five year warrants to purchase up to 480,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $2.50 per share.  As additional consideration for the purchase of the shares and warrants, we issued to these investors an option to purchase (i) up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock exercisable at $2.50 per share and (ii) a warrant to purchase up to 2,000,000 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $2.50 per share.

Director Independence

We have determined that the following individuals who currently serve as directors or served as directors during any part of the last completed fiscal year are not independent, as that term is defined in Section 10A(m)(3) of the Exchange Act:

NameCommittee Membership
Dan Gorski(1)
Mike McDonald(1)
Cecil Wall(1)

(1)  The Board has not established any committees.

We have determined that the following individuals who currently serve as directors or served as directors during any part of the last completed fiscal year are independent, as that term is defined in Section 10A(m)(3) of the Exchange Act:

NameCommittee Membership
Anthony Marchese(1)
(2)

(1)  Mr. Marchese joined the Board in December 2009.
(2)  The Board has not established any committees.

-50-

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The information required by this Item 14.  Principalwill be included under the section entitled “Principal Accountant Fees and Services

DuringServices” in the fiscal years ended August 31, 2010 and 2009, the aggregate fees billed by our independent accountants, LBB & Associates, Ltd., LLP,  for the audit of year-end financials and review of our quarterly financials and required SEC filings were as follows:

  
Fiscal year ended
August 31, 2010
  
Fiscal year ended
August 31, 2009
 
Audit fees $13,350  $9,772 
Audit-related fees $0.00  $0.00 
Tax fees $0.00  $0.00 
All other fees $0.00  $0.00 
         
Audit fees consist of fees relatedProxy Statement to professional services rendered in connectionbe filed with the audit of our annual financial statementsSecurities and the review of the financial statements included in each of our quarterly reportsExchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A, which information is incorporated by reference to this Annual Report on Form 10-Q.  Tax fees consist of fees for professional services rendered in connection with preparation and filing of our federal income tax returns and limited tax consulting.10-K.

Our policy is to pre-approve all audit and permissible non-audit services performed by the independent accountants. These services may include audit services, audit-related services, tax services and other services. Under our audit committee’s policy, pre-approval is provided for particular services or categories of services, including planned services, project based services and routine consultations. In addition, we may also pre-approve particular services on a case-by-case basis. We approved all services that our independent accountants provided to us in the past two fiscal years.
54

 
PART IV
 
ItemITEM 15.  ExhibitsEXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SCHEDULES

Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or incorporated by reference:
(1)The consolidated financial statements are listed on the “Index to Financial Statements” in Item 8.
(2)Financial Statement Schedules (omitted because the Company is a smaller reporting issuer).
The following exhibits are attached hereto or are incorporated by reference:

Exhibit NumberNo.Description
  
3.1(1)
Amended and Restated Bylaws, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Form 10 with the SEC on October 30, 2008.
3.2(1)
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Company’s Form 10 with the SEC on October 30, 2008.
3.3(2)
Amendment to Articles of Incorporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3(i) of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
4.1(2)
Form of Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.1*(1)
10.1
Amended and Restated 2008 Stock Option Plan, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011.
10.2(2)
Lease, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.3(2)
Form of Class A Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.4(2)
Form of Class B Warrant, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.5(2)
Form of Registration Rights Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.6(2)
Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and Anthony Marchese, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.7(2)
Form of Subscription Agreement for January 2011 Investment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.8(2)
Form of Warrant for January 2011 Investment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.9(2)
Form of Registration Rights Agreement for January 2011 Investment, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
10.10(2)
Shareholders’ Agreement, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 of the Company’s Form 10-K for the period ended August 31, 2009 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
14.1(2)
10.11
CodeDirector’s Agreement by and between the Company and General Gregory Martin, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of Ethicsthe Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on February 23, 2011.
31.1(3)10.12
Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and Graham A. Karklin incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011.
10.13Investment Banking Agreement by and between the Company and Sunrise Securities Corp. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.14Finders Agreement by and between the Company and Aspenwood Capital incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.15Institutional Public Relations Retainer Agreement by and between the Company and Sunrise Financial Group, Inc. incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
55

10.16Summary of Dan Gorski Employment Arrangement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.17Summary of Wm. Chris Mathers Employment Arrangement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.18Summary of Stanley Korzeb Employment Arrangementincorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.18 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.19Employment Agreement by and between the Company and Marc LeVier, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2011.
10.20Director’s Agreement by and between the Company and Jim Graham, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 of the Company’s Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 9, 2011.
10.21Option Agreement for Wm. Chris Mathers incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.21 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.22Form of Directors Option Agreement incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.22 of the Company’s Amendment No. 2 to its Registration Statement on Form S-1 (333-172116) filed with the SEC on May 25, 2011
10.23Form of Registration Rights Agreement for May/June option exercises, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011
10.24Denver Colorado Facilities Lease, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 of the Company’s Form 10-Q for the period ended May 31, 2011 filed with the SEC on July 15, 2011
31.1(1)Certification of the Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)13a-14 of the Exchange Act
31.2(3)
31.2(1)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a)13a-14 of the Exchange Act
32.1(3)
32.1(1)
Certification of the Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
adopted Pursuantpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
2002
32.2(3)
32.2(1)
Certification of the Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
adopted Pursuantpursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
2002

* Management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.
(1)Filed herewith

(1)    Filed as an exhibit to the Form 10 filed with the SEC on October 10, 2008.

(2)    Filed as an exhibit to the Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended August 31, 2008 filed with the SEC on February 8, 2011.
(3)    Filed herewith


 
-51-56

 
SIGNATURES

In accordance withPursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Texas Rare Earth Resources Corp.TEXAS RARE EARTH RESOURCES CORP.

/s/ DAN GORSKIK. Marc LeVier
Dan Gorski,K. Marc LeVier, duly authorized officer
and Principal Executive Officer

DATED:  February 8,November 22, 2011


/s/ WM. CHRIS MATHERSWm. Chris Mathers
Wm. Chris Mathers, Principal Financial Officer

DATED:  February 8,November 22, 2011

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

SignatureCapacityDate
/s/ DAN GORSKIK. Marc LeVier
Dan Gorski
K. Marc LeVier
Chief Executive Officer, Principal Executive Officer and DirectorFebruary 8,November 22, 2011
/s/ WM. CHRIS MATHERSWm. Chris Mathers
Wm. Chris Mathers
Chief Financial Officer and Principal Financial OfficerFebruary 8,November 22, 2011
/s/ Mike McDonaldAnthony Marchese
Mike McDonald
Anthony Marchese
Chairman of the BoardFebruary 8,November 22, 2011
/s/ Cecil WallDaniel E. Gorski
Cecil WallDaniel E. Gorski
DirectorFebruary 8,November 22, 2011
/s/ General Gregory Martin
Gregory Martin
DirectorNovember 22, 2011
/s/ James J. Graham
Jim Graham
DirectorNovember 22, 2011
/s/ Graham A. Karklin
Graham Karklin
DirectorNovember 22, 2011

 
-52-57