Table of Contents



UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 




Form 10-K

 

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)  OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20182020

  

  

or

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

  

For the transition period from          to          

 

000-31311

(Commission file number)

 

   

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 


Delaware

25-1701361

(State or other jurisdiction of

(I.R.S. Employer

Incorporation or organization)

Identification No.)

  

  

2858 De La Cruz Blvd.

95050

Santa Clara,, California

(Zip Code)

(Address of Registrant’s principal executive offices)

  

 

(408) 280-7900

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Classeach class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchangeeach exchange on Which Registeredwhich registered

Common Stock, $0.00015 par value

PDFS

The NASDAQNasdaq Stock Market LLC

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, (asas defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act).  Act.

Yes ☐     No ☑

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ☐     No ☑

1

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.                 

Yes ☑     No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).  

Yes ☑     No ☐

1

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  ☑

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

 

☐ Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated  filer

 Smaller reporting company

☐ Emerging growth company

If an emerging growth company, indicated by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report.       ☑

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  Yes ☐     No ☑

 

The aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant was approximately $291.1$406 million as of the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, based upon the closing sale price on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Market reported for such date. Shares of Common Stock held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.

 

There were 32,595,72337,145,127 shares of the Registrant’s Common Stock outstanding as of March 1, 2019.3, 2021.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Part III incorporates certain information by reference from the definitive Proxy Statement to be filed within 120 days from December 31, 2018.2020.

 

2

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

Page

PART I

Item 1.

Business

4

Item 1A.

Risk Factors

1216

Item 1B.

Unresolved Staff Comments

2126

Item 2.

Properties

2126

Item 3.

Legal Proceedings

2127

Item 4.

Mine Safety Disclosures

2127

 

 

PART II

Item 5.

Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

2228

Item 6.

Selected Financial Data

2429

Item 7.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

2530

Item 7A.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

3641

Item 8.

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

3743

Item 9.

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

6877

Item 9A.

Controls and Procedures

6877

Item 9B.

Other Information

6877

 

 

PART III

Item 10.

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

6978

Item 11.

Executive Compensation

6978

Item 12.

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

6978

Item 13.

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

6978

Item 14.

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

6978

 

 

PART IV

Item 15.

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

7079

Item 16.

Form 10-K Summary

7180

Signatures

7281

  

3

Table of Contents

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly in Item 1 “Business” and Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” includes forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These statements include, but are not limited to, statements concerning: expectations about the effectiveness of our business and technology strategies; expectations regarding global economic trends; expectations regarding recent and future acquisitions; current semiconductor industry trends; expectations of the success and market acceptance of our intellectual property and our solutions; the impact of the coronavirus (COVID-19) on the semiconductor industry and our business and our ability to obtain additional financing if needed. Our actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of factors, risks and uncertainties discussed in this Form 10-K, especially those contained in Item 1A of this Form 10-K. The words “may,” “anticipate,” “plan,” “continue,” “could,” “projected,” “expect,” “believe,” “intend,” and “assume,” the negative of these terms and similar expressions are used to identify forward-looking statements. All forward-looking statements and information included herein is given as of the filing date of this Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and based on information available to us at the time of this report and future events or circumstances could differ significantly from these forward-looking statements. Unless required by law, we undertake no obligation to update publicly any such forward-looking statements.

 

      The following information should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. All references to fiscal year apply to our fiscal year that ends on December 31. All references to “we”, “us”, “our”, “PDF”, “PDF Solutions” or “the Company” refer to PDF Solutions, Inc.   

 

 

PART I

 

Item 1.  Business

 

Business Overview

 

PDF Solutions offers products and servicesprovides comprehensive data solutions designed to empower engineers and data scientistsorganizations across the semiconductor ecosystem to improve the yield quality, and profitabilityquality of their products.products and operational efficiency for increased profitability. Our solutions combineproducts and services include proprietary software, physical intellectual property (or IP) for integrated circuit (or IC) designs, electrical measurement hardware tools,equipment, proven methodologies, and professional services. We primarily monetize our solutionsofferings through time-based license fees, and contract revenue for professional services.services, and increasingly recently, software as a service (or SaaS). In some cases, especially on our historical integrated yield ramp (or IYR) engagements, we also receive a value-based royalty that we call a Gainshare performance incentive.Gainshare. Our products and services have been sold to integrated device manufacturers (or IDMs), fabless semiconductor companies, foundries, equipment manufacturers, electronics manufacturing suppliers (or EMS), original device manufacturers (or ODMs), out-sourced semiconductor assembly and test (or OSATs), and system houses.

 

The key benefits of our productsofferings are greatly improved data connectivity, collection and services are improved product yieldsmanagement, equipment control, and product quality with faster time-to-market, which collectively increases profitability for our customers.analytics. For example, our foundry customers generate and analyze key manufacturing data using our solutions to shorten the time necessary for technology development and to provide their fabless customers with a higher yielding process with improved electrical performance, which are both critical metrics for market success. Higher yields in less time can also mean less total raw materials and process runs, which help lower customers’ total cost and minimize environmental impact. Also, for example, equipment manufacturers and factories use our integrated device manufacturers (or IDMs)connectivity products to implement evolving industry standards for their equipment or operations, respectively, with required quality and stability. By way of further example, our IDM and fabless customers use our solutions to generate unique, differentiated data that can be analyzed with our machine learning (ML)(or ML) and artificial intelligence (AI)(or AI) algorithms to predict downstream manufacturing issues, resulting in shorter time for initial designs to meet performance requirements with fewer iterations and faster time-to-market. For furtherfinal example, our foundry and OSAT customers use the AI and ML applications of our software to optimize for process control, assembly, and/or test.

 

4

Table of Contents

 

Our long-term business strategy is to be the data solutions provider of choice for the semiconductor and electronic supply chain to enable our customers to optimize processes, designs, and fabrication for high yield, low cost, time-to-market, and high performance.electronics ecosystems. To achieve this, we intend to:

 

 

ExpandOffer a Common, Flexible Platform for a Broad Group of Customers Across the Supply Chain. As semiconductor and electronics products are made with the efforts of equipment manufacturers, front end foundries, chip and system designers, design automation, IP providers, and OSATs, there is a need to analyze the data across this whole chain to optimize yields, operational efficiencies, time to market, quality, and reliability. The Exensio platform is designed to provide a common platform to enable these different participants to analyze the relevant end-to-end data in near real-time, with data stores from 10s to 100s of terabytes (TBs) and flexible configurations for IDM, foundry, fabless, and OSAT specific needs. Our Market Opportunity By Offering Complete SolutionsML solutions combine professional services with the Exensio platform to further enable our customers to push their analytics “to the edge” of their global supply chains and shift the analysis and decision-making processes closer to where their data is being generated. We believe enabling edge analytics will further increase our customers’ ability to improve product yield, quality, performance, and profitability, and therefore, should drive the market for our products and services.

Drive Tool-Level Software Installations to Create an Infrastructure of Connected Equipment and Enable Smart Factories. We intendbelieve that driving installation of our software products at the tool level will provide an infrastructure of connected equipment and help to enable smart factories. In July 2020, we entered into a strategic partnership with Advantest Corporation through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantest America, Inc., (which we collectively refer to as Advantest) that includes the development of cloud-based applications for Advantest tools that leverage our Exensio software analytics. We believe this will allow us to increase the breadthnetwork of tools connected with PDF software and depthprovide Advantest tool customers with increased data management and analytics. In December 2020, we acquired Cimetrix Incorporated (or Cimetrix) and began providing software products based on open standards for equipment control and connectivity to equipment manufacturers and factories. We believe that in the smart manufacturing era, the industry will demand the increased equipment connectivity and control our products and solutions offer. Further, we believe that the benefits from integration between analytics on equipment, the factory, and in the cloud will provide synergies with our existing end-to-end analytics offerings.

Create Differentiated Data Sources for Better Analytics. Historically, companies have only used data that was generated from their manufacturing and test process to drive improvements. We offer unique IP (such as Characterization Vehicle® (CV®) test chips) that is not part of an IC’s functionality, but significantly improves the use ofmanufacturing process by improving yield learning and reducing time to market. Also, our solutions by focusing on complete offerings instead of only point products at both newDesign-for-Inspection™ (DFI™) system provides on-chip instrumentation and existing customers. For example, with deployments of our 1st and 2nd generation DFI systems and with DFI on-chip instruments embedded in over 100 customer chipsmeasurement applications from 28nm28 nanometer (nm) down to 7nm we believe there is a ready market for our analysis software, which is co-optimized with the measurement instruments for comprehensiveness and efficiencydesigned to identify blockers that impact product yield and quality weeks or months earlier than with any other hardware- or software-based methodology. We believe that in the foresight provided by this application will be of significant interest to companies acrossMore-than-Moore (MtM) era, the semiconductor industry and willdifferentiated data we provide a solid footprint that can be expandedplay an important role in subsequent years with the license of additional analysis applications, such as yield, fault detection and classification (or FDC), and test.

Expand in China. China represents a significant opportunity for the semiconductor industry over the next few decades. Success in China will depend on the successful engagement with customers in three key categories: fabless semiconductor vendors, pure-play foundries, and memory vendors. PDF has customers in all three categories that are well-known and highly respected by other prospective customers in China. We intend to leverageenabling our success with these customers to further penetrate the China market. We also intend to leverage our foresight capabilities, led by the combination of our DFI solutions and Exensio platform, to provide compelling capabilities for the emerging China semiconductor ecosystem as they ramp to the most advanced process nodes.

Align Our Business to the Evolving Semiconductor Marketplace. As fewer companies continue down the path of Moore’s Law, the vast majority of other companies are embracing a “More than Moore” (or MtM) approach, seeking to achieve higher performance and smaller form-factors but without the design and manufacturing costs of the most advanced process nodes. Due to our extensive knowledge about every process node currently in mass production at the majority of the world’s leading foundries, we are in position to be the provider of choice for semiconductor companies embracing an MtM approach to bring their new products to market. Combinedmarket faster and with the differentiated data generated by our solutions, our productshigher quality and services are designed to accelerate how quickly customers can achieve fast yield ramps for products based on manufacturing techniques such as system-in-package (or SiP)performance, and, multi-chip-packages (or MCPs) that are popular with MtM design approaches.ultimately, more profitability.

Brief History

 

PDF Solutions was incorporated in Pennsylvania in November 1992, and we reincorporated in California in November 1995. In July 2000, we reincorporated in Delaware, and in July 2001, we completed an initial public offering. Our shares of common stock are currently traded on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Market as PDFS. 

From 2000 through 2009, we expanded our technology footprint and our operations in various countries through acquisitions. From 2009 to 2018,2019, we primarily focused on the pervasive application of our technology to leading edge logic manufacturing and achieving yield targets with our clients that maximized Gainshare revenues.royalties. In 2013, we leveraged our extensive experience in yield simulation software and Characterization VehicleCV® test chip development and started research and development on an e-beam solution for non-contact, inline electrical characterization and process control for wafer inspection. The first generationfirst-generation e-beam tool for DFI™ was completed in 2015, and the second generation was commercially deployed in 2018.2019. In a parallel effort, starting in 2014, we re-architected our point-solution software tools into a new generation, highly-integrated data analytics Exensio platform, which resulted in accelerated growth in software through 2018.2019. In 2020, we expanded into factory connectivity and began to focus on closer integration with equipment manufacturers. Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, we also operate worldwide with offices in Canada, China, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan.

5

Table of Contents

 

Industry Background

 

Rapid technological innovation with increasingly shorter product life cycles has fueled the economic growth of the semiconductor industry since the days of the PC revolution. IC companies have historically ramped production slowly, produced at high volume once a product gained market acceptance, and slowly reduced production volume when price and demand started to decrease near the end of the product’s life cycle. Today there are many different business models across the semiconductor industry: products that follow the traditional life cycle just described, products targeted towards fast-moving market segments like IoT, utilizingInternet of Things (or IoT) – which utilize mature process nodes and requiringrequires a fast ramp to volume with a relatively short life cycle –, and products focused on long term market segments like automotive and industrial where product life cycles can last a decade or longer. There is a lot of variation across these business models depending on the level of design complexity and the maturity of the process node used for product implementation. Processors, memory and FPGAsfield-programmable gate arrays (FPGA) continue to leverage the most advanced process nodes and experience significant challenges to achieve competitive initial yields and optimized performance. Some products and market segments, however, are content to utilize older process nodes. Regardless of the process node used for implementation or how long the product will be sold in the market, success for every semiconductor company is predicated, among other things, on fast product yield ramp and the ability to optimize manufacturing and test metrics, such as yield reclamation, product quality, and test efficiency, throughout a product’s life cycle. Thus, technologies or capabilities that can accelerate yield ramp, improve product quality, and optimize production efficiencies are highly sought after because they typically lead to cost reduction and revenue generation concurrently, causing a leveraged effect on profitability.

5

Table of Contents

 

Technology and Intellectual Property Protection

 

ThroughOur success is largely dependent upon our proprietary software. We believe the creative skills and technological ability of our personnel, product enhancements, and new product development are necessary to maintaining our position as a leading provider. We rely primarily on trade secret rights, copyright and trademark laws, and nondisclosure and other contractual agreements to protect our technology. We seek to protect our IP under patent laws and as of December 31, 2020, we held 175 U.S. patents. Our issued patents have expiration dates from 2022 through 2039. We intend to prepare additional patent applications when we feel it is beneficial. We also employ protection of our trademarks, with registration of marks, including Characterization Vehicle, Cimetrix, CV, eProbe, Exensio, pdFasTest, PDF Solutions, and the PDF Solutions and Cimetrix logos. We have common law rights to additional trademarks, including ALPS, DFI, DirectProbe, DirectScan, FIRE, and VarScan. We also enter into confidentiality and inventions assignment agreements with our employees and confidentiality and license agreements with our customers and the various parties we partner with to resell, distribute, and, in some cases, integrate our products. Further, we limit access to and distribution of our software, documentation and other proprietary information. Third parties could in any case develop competing technologies that include similar functionality or features, or otherwise are substantially equivalent or superior to our technologies. In addition, effective patent, copyright, trademark and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in certain foreign countries where we operate. Our business could suffer significantly if we fail to protect our proprietary technology.

In addition, through yield, performance, and reliability improvement services over more than 20 years, we have accumulated a vast library of physical IP in the form of test structures. As part of our DFI and CV solutions,systems, our engineers create designs of experiments (or DOEs) and layouts for targeted fail modes. We have also developed electrical measurement hardware tools and proprietary extraction, design, and analysis software. In addition, our technology embodies many production-proven and patented algorithms.  Further, our IP includes proven methodologies that our implementation teams use as guidelines to drive our customers’ use of our technology. We strive to continually enhance our core technologies through the codification of knowledge that we gain in the use of our products and delivery of services.

    

Our future success and competitive position rely to some extent upon our ability to protect these proprietary technologies and IP, to generate revenue from the licensed sale and support of our software and hardware to customers, and to prevent competitors from using our systems, methods, and technologies in their products or solutions. To accomplish this, we rely primarily on a combination of contractual provisions, confidentiality procedures, trade secrets, and patent, copyright, mask work, and trademark laws. We license our products and technologies pursuant to non-exclusive license agreements that impose restrictions on customers’ use. In addition, we seek to avoid disclosure of our trade secrets, including requiring employees, customers, and others with access to our proprietary information to execute confidentiality agreements with us, and restricting access to our source code. We also seek to protect our software, documentation, and other written materials under trade secret and copyright laws. We seek to protect our IP under patent laws and as of December 31, 2018, we held 140 U.S. patents. Our issued patents have expiration dates from 2019 through 2037. We intend to prepare additional patent applications when we feel it is beneficial. We also employ protection of our trademarks, with registration of marks, including Characterization Vehicle, CV, eProbe, Exensio, pdFasTest, PDF Solutions, the PDF Solutions logo. We have common law rights to additional trademarks, including ALPS, Design-for-Inspection, DFI, DirectProbe, and DirectScan.

Products and Services

 

Products

Throughorganic development and targeted acquisitions over more than 20 years, we have accumulated an array of highly-integrated and co-designed proprietaryOur primary software physical IP for IC designs, electrical measurement tools, and proven methodologies. Subsets of this array are selected to address each customer’s specific technical and business requirements. For example, a fabless customer designing a new product may use our proprietary on-wafer instruments and cell libraries to design physical IP to enhance their design for manufacturability or inspection. By way of another example, a fabless company in volume manufacturing may use our data analytic software tools, which are also available to their foundry partners, to monitor how their designs are performing at their foundry partners. The following gives more information about our products and services, including when combined into solutions.

Solutions

Data Analytics Solutions.  Our Exensio®-based solutions are designed to link the critical data streams from the entire manufacturing process – from bare wafer to packaged part or system – to improve yield and yield recovery, provide both better operational and process control of tools and testers, and maintain comprehensive traceability from starting wafer through to final packaged part or system. When used in conjunction with our Characterization Vehicle solutions, our data analytics solutions enable customers to correlate the unique, differentiated CVi data with other manufacturing data, to improve yield and yield recovery while simultaneously reducing the overhead of manufacturing and test operations. The services we provide with this solution include data analysis, integration and configuration for MES or facility-wide deployment, tool connections, development of filter plans, data collection, management, and training.

Design-for-Inspection (or DFI) Solutions.   Our DFI solutions are designed to enable our customers to achieve non-contact, inline electrical characterization and process control. DFI provides customers an ability to insert on-chip instruments with calibrated electrical responses directly in the product wafer without any die area penalty. In addition, DFI is designed to be high-throughput, enabling inline use. The electrical measurements augment and enhance existing inline defect inspection and metrology methods. The services we provide with this solution include design of the on-chip instruments tuned to our customers’ product and/or process specifics, design synthesis support for DFI instrument insertion, on-site tool support services, data analysis, and training

Foundry Solution. We provide our foundry customers a complete DFI system for inline characterization and process control. This DFI infrastructure includes not only on-wafer IP, or on-chip instruments, but also the eProbe® measurement tool and the Exensio® Characterization software for DFI data processing and analysis. All aspects of the foundry solution are optimized for high data contrast, fast data handling, and comprehensive data analysis to provide foresight into downstream issues that could impact product yield, quality, or performance.

6

Table of Contents

Fabless IP.  We work closely with our fabless customers to tune the DFI on-chip instruments to reflect the key aspects of their product designs. We also provide proprietary software that is designed to efficiently distribute DFI filler cells across the die, for maximum issue coverage with fast readout. DFI is designed to enable every fabless company designing products at 28 nanometers and below to achieve better manufacturing results.

Characterization Vehicle Solutions.  We offer solutions that are designed to accelerate the efficiency of yield learning by shortening the learning cycle, learning more per cycle, and reducing the number of silicon wafers required in manufacturing processes. The services we provide with this solution include designing test structures and DOEs that are tuned to our customers’ product and/or process specifics, tester support, data analysis, and training. Our targeted offerings include:

Process R&D. Our process R&D solutions are designed to help customers increase the robustness of their manufacturing processes by characterizing and reducing the variability of unit processes and device performance with respect to layout characteristics within anticipated process design rules.

Process Integration and Yield Ramp. Our process integration and yield ramp solutions are designed to enable our customers to more quickly ramp the yield of new products early in the manufacturing process by characterizing the process-design interactions within each key process module, simulating product yield loss by process module, and prioritizing quantitative yield improvement by design block in real products.

Design-Specific Characterization Vehicle Infrastructure. Leveraging our learnings from Characterization Vehicle test structures to accelerate foundry process development, we are now applying that technology to specific designs via CV™ Core. By implementing Characterization Vehicle test structures as physical IP embedded within a semiconductor customer’s design, we can collect differentiated data related to the performance and reliability of each chip. Using that data in our Exensio platform, we can deliver product-specific insights that enable them to prioritize engineering efforts and deliver improved and more predictable IC reliability and performance.

Products

Our solutions incorporate our various proprietary software and hardware products and other technologies, depending on the customers’ needs. The Exensio platform and modules are also offered on a standalone licensed basis. Our software and hardware products and other technologiessystems include the following:

 

Exensio Platform. Our separately-offered Exensio platform addressessoftware products address the big data manufacturing challenge of today’s advanced process nodes and highly integrated products, by linking across YMS, FDC, test floor, and other enterprise data types. Theseproviding a common environment throughout the supply chain for different data types, includeincluding inline and end-of-line metrology, yield, parametric, performance, manufacturing consumables, tool-level sensor data, test floor data, logistical data, as well as custom data types. By providing a common environment for all these different data types from many different points in the manufacturing and test process, our Exensio platform enables customersproducts are designed to rapidly perform root cause diagnosis of yield, performance, and quality issues that impact manufacturing and test operations. This same platform also enables predictive and proactive optimization decisions for process control, process adjustments, PM scheduling, tool corrective actions, wafer dispatching, and wafer level and final test. Collectively, our Exensio platform enablesenable real-time rapid diagnosis and understanding of key manufacturing and test metrics during both inline and end-of-line wafer processing, helping

6

Table of Contents

customers reduce product variability and cost simultaneously. The platform currently consistsBy integrating silos of five main modules indata and applying AI and ML, Exensio products resolve the field today.  These moduleslimitation of local optimization and provide better foresight across the entire production process, reducing the time it takes to make critical decisions that can be used separately, or combined to provide seamless integration of these traditionally disparate data flowsdrive higher product yield, quality and applications.  Certainreliability. Exensio functionality isproducts are available as either an on-premise installationlicense or through our software-as-a-service (or SaaS) offering.  The fiveSaaS and are offered in four main, modulesseparately-offered Exensio products targeting the needs of the customer’s business model: Exensio platformIDM, Exensio Fabless, Exensio Foundry, and Exensio OSAT. Each of these products are comprised of two or more modules to provide specific capabilities to address a particular type of company’s needs and requirements; however, there are common features, functionality, and purpose across some of the key modules as follows:

 

 

Manufacturing Analytics (formerly Exensio YieldYield) collects yield– This module uses our proprietary database schema to store collected data and stores it in an embedded, analysis-ready database. This database provides a common environment andwith a consistent view of allview. For example, product yield data, enabling product engineers use it to identify and analyze production yield, performance, reliability and other issues. The Exensio YieldElements of this module isare designed to handle very large and complex data sets that are commonplace in the semiconductor industry, and, in combination with our proprietary analytics tools, aids engineers in diagnosing complex issues that negatively impact productivity, yield, and time-to-market for the products they develop.industry.  To support the multi-dimensional product requirements of our customers, the powerful, interactive visualization and analysis capabilities in Exensio Yieldthis product are highly flexible and user-configurable.

 

7

Table of Contents

 

Process Control (formerly Exensio ControlControl) – This module provides FDCfailure detection and classification (or FDC) capabilities for monitoring, alarming, and control of manufacturing tool sets. These capabilities include proprietary data collection and analysis of tool sensor trace data and summary indicators designed to rapidly identify sources of process variations and manufacturing excursions. When used together with the above Exensio Yield module,Manufacturing Analytics and related modules, the accretive data mining and correlation capabilities are designed to enable identification of tool level sources of yield loss and process variation thatand enable predictive and proactive optimization decisions for process control, process adjustments, PM scheduling, tool corrective actions, wafer dispatching, and wafer level and final test to impact end of line product yield, performance, and reliability.

 

 

 

Test Operations (formerly Exensio Test) Test– This module provides comprehensive data collection and analysis capabilities for data generated during manufacturing test operations. These capabilities include the overall optimization ofoperations designed to optimize test operations management overall, including improving test productivity, performing part average test, supporting test floor operations, and implementing adaptive test. This moduleTest Operations is also providesdesigned to provide predictive insights based on proprietary analytics during test, assembly and packaging — maximizingto maximize the efficiency of test operations, productivity improvements and yield reclamation.

 

 

ExensioCharacterization encapsulates test structure analysis functionality of both electrical and inline inspection data from our proprietary Characterization Vehicle test chips and DFI on-chip instruments.

Assembly Operations (formerly Exensio ALPS) ALPS– This module provides device manufacturers with the capability to link all deviceassembly and packaging data with other product lifecycle data, including fabrication and characterization data, from every step ofacross the product life cycle. This includes data fromData sources could include manufacturing, wafer acceptance test, wafer sort, test and assembly, final test, and field use. ThisThe proprietary data linkage enabled by Assembly Operations is also enablesdesigned to enable device manufacturers to maintain full traceability of their finished products back to the source wafer without the need for Electronic Chip IDs or ECIDs.(or ECIDs). This capability is becoming an essential requirement for safety-critical market segments such as automotive and mil-aero.military-aerospace.

 

Design-for-Inspection (or DFI) System.  Our DFI IP design engineers develop designs-of-experiments (or DOEs)System is a combination of on-chip measurement instruments, hardware to determine how IC design building blocks interact withmeasure such instruments, software to insert the manufacturing process. Theseinstruments into customer layouts and analyze the results, and related services. This system is designed to enable our customers to achieve non-contact, inline electrical characterization and more effective process control. The DFI system provides customers an ability to insert on-chip instruments are inserted into testwith calibrated electrical responses directly in the product wafer without die area penalty. In addition, the DFI system is designed to be high-throughput, enabling inline use. The electrical measurements augment and product wafersenhance existing inline defect inspection and measured on custom e-beam measurement hardware.metrology methods. The DFI system leverages our production-proven design and analysis infrastructure,infrastructure. The primary software and includes:hardware products included in the DFI system are as follows:

 

DFI On-Chip Instruments.Instruments Our on-chip characterizationmeasurement instruments are developed with the sameusing our proprietary designFIRE™ layout analysis software as our CV test chips and are tuned to capture key features of our customers’ product layouts using our proprietary FIRE™ layout analysis software.layouts. As part of the system offering, we generally provide design services to create these instruments. These DFI instruments are based on our Characterization Vehicle technology and are designed to be placed in test chips, scribe lines, or in product die, without any area penalty, and to exhibit specific electrical responses.

 

eProbe®eProbe® Non-Contact E-Beam Tool. Our eProbe e-beam tools are designed to measure the electrical response of the DFI instruments.instruments and suitable product layout structures. This newunique, differentiated data is a measure, which we call an Electrical Response Index (or ERI), allowsthat is designed to allow for more precise inline characterization of design-process interactions. As part of the system offering, we generally provide tool support services to customers to operate this tool. The second generation tool includes orders of magnitude advances in throughput and accuracy that now enable DFI on-chip instruments to be used for inline control for leading-edge semiconductor process nodes.

7

 

Exensio® Characterization Software. Exensio Characterization Software – This software, which is also a part of our Exensio platform, is designed to analyze the billions of measurements collected from DFI on-chip instruments using the eProbe tool. As part of the system offering, we generally provide analysis services to customers to perform this analysis and provide summary findings and recommendations.

There are two configurations for the DFI System:

Foundry Configuration – We provide foundry customers two configurations for inline characterization and process control, the DFI configuration and the DirectScan configuration. The DFI configuration includes on-wafer IP, or on-chip instruments, the eProbe measurement tool, and the Exensio Characterization software for DFI data processing and analysis. The DirectScan configuration includes the eProbe measurement tool and the Exensio Characterization software for data processing and analysis of relevant product patterns. All aspects of the foundry configurations are designed to be optimized for high data contrast, fast data handling, and comprehensive data analysis to provide foresight into downstream issues that could impact yield, reliability, or performance.

Fabless Configuration – We work closely with our fabless customers to tune the DFI on-chip instruments to reflect the key aspects of their product designs. As part of this configuration, we generally provide our DFI insertion software kit to customers, which is designed to efficiently distribute DFI filler cells across the die, for maximum issue coverage with fast readout. The DFI system is designed to enable fabless companies designing products at 28 nanometers and below to achieve better manufacturing results.

 

Characterization Vehicle Infrastructure.(CV) System. Our engineers developCV system is a DOE to determine how IC design building blocks interact with the manufacturing process. Our software utilizes the DOE, in combination with our proprietary library of building blocks that highlight potential yield and performance issues, to generate CV test chip layouts. Ourchips, hardware to test such products, software to analyze the test results, and related services. This system is designed to accelerate the efficiency of yield learning by shortening the learning cycle, learning more per cycle, and reducing the number of silicon wafers required in manufacturing processes. This system includes physical IP in the form of test structures and DOEs that are tuned to our customers’ product and/or process specifics, tester hardware, data analysis, and training. The primary software and hardware products included in the CV infrastructure includes:system are as follows:

 

 

CV Test Chips.Chips – Our family of proprietary test chip products ischips are designed by our professional engineers using our proprietary FIRE™ layout analysis software. These test chips are run through thea customer’s manufacturing process, with intentional process modifications, to provide unique, differentiated data to explore the effects of potential process improvements given natural manufacturing variations. Our custom-designed CV test chips are optimized for our test hardware and analysis software and include DOEs tuned to each customer’s process. Our full-reticle short-flowTypes of CV test chips include:

Our full-reticle and shared-reticle CV test chips are designed to provide a fast learning cycle for specific process modules and are fully integrated with third-party failure analysis and inspection tools for a complete diagnosis to understand root causes. Our full-reticle CV test chips use a shortened process flow to provide a faster learning cycle for specific process modules:

Our Scribe CV productstest chip are inserted directly on customers’ product wafers andto collect data about critical layers.

Our DirectProbeDirectProbe™ CV test chips are designed to enable ultra-fast yield learning for new product designs by allowing our clients to measure components of actual product layout.

8

Table of Contents

 

Exensio Characterization software.  Exensio Characterization software, also a part of our Exensio platform, collects data from our CV test chips, enabling models of the performance effects of process variations on these design building blocks to be generated for use with our FIRE software.

 

Our VarScan™ CV test chips are designed for front-end or through-silicon via (or TSV) application with a focus on high resolution resistance variation analysis for mass production.

 

pdFasTest® Electrical Tester.Tester – Our proprietary test hardware system enablesis optimized to quickly test our CV test chips, enabling fast defect and parametric characterization of manufacturing processes. As part of the system offering, we provide test programs for each CV test chip that are tuned to the customer’s process. This automated system provides parallel functional testing, thus minimizing the time required to perform millions of electrical measurements to test our CV test chips. We provide services to analyze the unique, differentiated data output of this tester using the Exensio Characterization software to provide actionable insights to our customers.

Exensio Characterization software – This software, which is also a part of our Exensio platform, collects the data generated from our CV test products, generating models of the performance effects of process variations on these design building blocks. As part of the system offering, we also offer analysis services, if the customer elects not to do such analysis itself.

8

Cimetrix® Software Products.Our Cimetrix software products enable equipment manufacturers to provide industry standard interfaces on their products for efficient equipment communication, control, and collection of equipment data. There are numerous industry standards that have been established for equipment connectivity and control, including the SEMI defined SECS (SEMI Equipment Communication Standard), GEM (Generic Equipment Model), and PV2 (new photovoltaic equipment communication standard based on SECS/GEM) standards. By providing software products that fully support these industry standards, equipment manufacturers can implement robust, turnkey support for these connectivity and control standards without needing to invest engineering resources to develop their own interfaces to these standards. Factories that purchase manufacturing equipment enabled with Cimetrix-supported interfaces, benefit from consistent and robust implementations of industry standards, enabling faster and more efficient implementation of smart manufacturing initiatives that depend on the collection and analysis of manufacturing and product data. There are two separate Cimetrix product lines targeting the needs of factory equipment connectivity and control. The products are sold via perpetual licenses and runtime royalties.

Equipment Factory Connectivity – Our products for equipment connectivity primarily include the following:

CIMConnect™ is designed for general purpose equipment connectivity and enables production equipment in the semiconductor and electronics industries to communicate data to the factory’s host computer through the SECS/GEM and PV2 standards. CIMConnect can also support other emerging communications standards for maximum flexibility. In addition, it supports multiple-host interfaces simultaneously, which allows customers to support legacy, custom, and GEM interfaces. CIMConnect is used in semiconductor wafer fabrication, semiconductor back-end (test, assembly, and packaging), PV, HB-LED, disk drive, flat panel displays, printed circuit boards and other electronics manufacturing.

CIM300is asoftware development kit (or SDK) used by manufacturers of 300mm semiconductor equipment that is designed to enable quick implementation of the required 300mm SEMI standards, including E39, E40, E87, E90, E94, E116, E148, and E157. These SEMI standards allow for the full automation required in manufacturing 300mm wafers. The CIM300 SDK includes CIMConnect, TESTConnect, and SECSConnect.

CIMPortal Plusis an SDK for equipment manufacturers that allows for quick implementation of the Interface A, also known as EDA (Equipment Data Acquisition), and other SEMI standards, including E120, E125, E132, E134, E138, E147, and E164. Interface A specifies a new port on equipment that provides detailed structured data that can be used for advanced process control, e-diagnostics, and other equipment engineering service applications. These software applications are becoming critical to the fabs as shorter ramp times are required.

Equipment Control – Our primary equipment control product is the CIMControlFramework™ software, which is based on the latest Microsoft.NET technology. It is designed to enable equipment manufacturers to meet the supervisory control, material handling, platform and process control, and factory automation requirements of the fabrication facilities or fabs. Developers can leverage framework components through configuration and extension or customize when unique requirements exist. CIMControlFramework, unlike one-off solutions, is supported and maintained with upgrades, improvements, and performance enhancements. With a data-driven architecture at the core of the framework, data generated at any point on the equipment is designed to be quickly and easily accessed by any other module or external application.

 

FIRE

Software.Services

Our services are almost always sold together with, or to support, our products and include the following:

Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) – We provide services to make our Exensio software available to our customers via the Internet, generally hosted by third-party providers. SaaS is considered part of cloud computing since the software is hosted on the Internet, or the “cloud.” Since our SaaS applications are accessed from a remote server rather than installed on individual machines, it is easier to maintain. For example, when the remote software is updated, the customer’s interface is also updated for all users. Cloud computing is designed to eliminate incompatibilities between different software versions and allow us to make incremental updates without requiring software downloads. Additionally, our customers can save data to a central online location, which is designed to allow increased project collaboration. As part of these services, we also typically provide hosted management services for the licensed software and the customer’s data stored in our cloud. These services include environment set-up and configuration, system health monitoring, data integration maintenance, integration monitoring, system updates, security, and data upload/download, and license administration.

9

Software Related Services Our FIREWe provide software analyzes an IC designmaintenance and support (or M&S), data management services, various value-added services (or VAS) to perform design attribute extraction and feature-based yield modeling to compute both systematic and random yield loss due to optical proximity effects, etch micro-lading, dishing in CM,install, configure, or create analysis templates, and other basicprofessional services to achieve customers’ specific outcomes using our software. We call this last type of services our solutions offering and, in these cases, we tailor the use of one or more Exensio products to achieve a desired result. For example, our AIM YieldAware™ FDC solution offering is designed to identify the process issues. FIRE Softwarecontrol variables that have the greatest impact on product yield through professional services that analyze the data from both Exensio Process Control and elements of Exensio Manufacturing Analytics and make recommendations for the customer to implement. VAS are provided by our professional service personnel with expertise that enhances and complements the engineering teams at our customers. For example, VAS includes our data cleaning and monitoring services. One requirement of big data analytics is driven byto have clean, harmonized data to analyze. This service offering outsources the data wrangling and management effort to free the customer to focus their efforts on analysis, which has a combinationgreater ROI to the company than data management.

IYR Services – These services are designed to characterize key product and/or process elements, primarily into CV test structures or DFI on-chip measurement instruments, and typically include performance incentives based on the customers’ yield achievement. We provide these services, together with all of industry-standard layout datathe elements of our CV system, to foundry customers as an Integrated Yield Ramp project in connection with new process technology development and proprietary yield models created fromramp. In IYR engagements, we generally provide the analysis of our CV test chips described above.

Template Technology.  Our Templatetechnology includes Templatyzer software and IPprovide summary findings and recommendations to the customer. IYR engagements can include DFI systems for identifyinguse during the implementation period. As electrical scaling has slowed down significantly over the past few years, we have chosen to focus our resources and developing a set of layout patterns thatinvestment in analytics; however, these IYR services are tailoredstill offered from time to a given manufacturing process and target product application, and checks the proposed designs against this set of patterns for optimal manufacturability.time.

 

Customers

 

Our existing customers include foundries, IDMs, fabless semiconductor design companies, OSATs, as well as some equipment manufacturers, EMS, and ODMs, including those that embed and distribute our Exensio ALPS productsAssembly Operations modules in their equipment. Our semiconductor customers’ targeted product segments vary significantly, including microprocessors, memory, graphics, image sensor solutions, and communications. We believe that the adoption of our solutions by such companies for usage in a wide range of products validates the application of our solutions to the broader semiconductor market. We often have multiple contracts with a single customer or customer group, with no interdependent performance obligations. In general, our customer contracts are non-cancellable.

 

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc., which, together with its subsidiaries, we collectively call GlobalFoundries, represented 37%23% of our revenues for 20182020 and 40%31% of our revenues for 2017. GlobalFoundries and Samsung represented 41% and 11%, respectively, of our revenues for 2016.2019. No other customer accounted for 10% or more of our revenues in 2018, 2017,2020 and 2016.

Although a substantial portion of our total revenues are concentrated in a small number of customers, the total revenues for each of these customers in any period is the result of our Design-to-silicon-yield solutions and Gainshare performance incentives revenues being recognized in the period under multiple, separate contracts, with no interdependent performance obligations. In general, our customer contracts are non-cancellable. These contracts were all entered into in the ordinary course of our business and contain general terms and conditions that are standard across most of our yield improvement solutions customers, including providing services typically targeted to one manufacturing process node, for example, the 28 or 14 nanometer node.  Fluctuations in future results may occur if any of these customers default on contractual commitments or renegotiate pre-existing contractual commitments, including due to adverse changes in their own business. For example, during the third quarter of 2018, a major customer publicly announced that it was indefinitely suspending the development and production of its 7nm technology node. This customer’s decision negatively impacted our Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenues in the fourth quarter of 2018. We cannot assess the ultimate resolution of this non-cancellable contract at the current time, pending further discussion with the customer. We expect that Gainshare performance incentives revenues related to this contract will not be recognized in the long-term as Gainshare performance incentives revenues are based on future production of the customer.2019. See the discussion in “Risk Factors” under Item 1A for more information about risks associated with customer concentration and contractual provisions.

 

International revenues accounted for approximately 60%58% of our total revenues for 2018 compared to 61% for 20172020 and 64% for 2016.2019. We base these calculations on the geographic location of where the work is performed.performed or where the customer is located. Revenues from customers by geographic area based on the location of the customers’ work sites for our last threetwo fiscal years can be found in Note 11,14, “Customer and Geographic Information” to the consolidated financial statements. Additional discussion regarding the risks associated with international operations can be found under Item 1A, “Risk Factors”.

 

See our “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements”, included under Part II, Item 8. “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” for additional geographic information.

 

9

Table of Contents

 

Sales and Marketing

 

Our sales strategy is to pursue targeted accounts through a combination of our direct sales force, our solution service teams, and strategic alliances. After we are engaged by a customer and early in the solution services process, our engineers seek to establish relationships in the organization and gain an understanding of our customers’ business issues. Our direct sales and solution service teams combine their efforts to deepen our customer relationships by expanding our penetration across the customer’scustomers’ products, processes, and technologies. This close working relationship with theeach customer has the added benefit of helping us to identify new product areas and technologies in which we should next focus our research and development efforts. From time-to-time, we use sales representatives/agents in various locations to augment direct sales in certain territories. For example, in 2018, we engaged Abrolex in China, Recynergy in Taiwan, Tessolve in India and Southeast Asia. We expect to continue to establish strategic alliances with process licensors, vendors in the electronic design automation software, capital equipment for IC production, and test silicon IP and mask-making software segments to create and take advantage of sales channel and co-marketing opportunities. Additionally, we expect to form relationships with key value chain participants, including foundries and OSATs, to provide services and value across the manufacturing supply chain.

 

10

Table of Contents

Research and Development

 

Our research and development focuses on developing and introducing new proprietary technologies, including our Exensio platform, Cimetrix connectivity and control products, and DFI solutionand CV systems, as well as other software products and enhancements to our existing solutions, such as field applications for DFI.DFI and CV. We use a rapid-prototyping paradigm in the context of the customer engagement to achieve these goals. We have made, and expect to continue to make, substantial investments in research and development. The complexity of our technologies requires expertise in standards, physical IC design and layout, transistor design and semiconductor physics, semiconductor process integration, numerical algorithms, e-beam technology, hardware, statistics and software development. We believe that our team of engineers will continue to advance our market and technological leadership. We conduct in-house training for our engineers in thecertain technical areas. Our training also extends to focusing on ways to enhance client service skills. Although it fluctuates, we can have up to one quarter of our research and development engineers operating in the field, partnered with solution services engineers, in a deliberate strategy to provide direct feedback between technology development and customer needs. We also utilize a variety of skilled independent contractors for specialized development.

 

 

Competition

 

The semiconductor industry is highly competitive and driven by rapidly changing design and process technologies, evolving standards, short product life cycles, and decreasing prices. We expect market competition to continue to develop and increase as the market for data and analytics continues to evolve. We believe the solution to address the needs of IC companies requiresbenefit from a comprehensive and unified platform comprisedcombination of a big data management infrastructure, AI/ML-based analytics engines, and products that generate and collect differentiated data that enrich the analytics process. Currently, we are a leading provider of comprehensive commercial hardware, software and IP solutions for optimizing and improving design, manufacturing and test operations processes through the application of differentiated data and advanced analytics. We face indirect competition from internal groups at IC companies that use disparate and ad hocoffer tools not optimizedwith varying degrees of optimization to accelerate process-design integration or test operations. Some providers of semiconductor manufacturing software, inspection equipment, electronic design automation, or design IP may seek to broaden their product offerings and compete with us. In each of the market segments we compete in, we face competition from established and potential competitors, some of whichwhom may have greater financial, research, engineering, manufacturing and marketing resources than we have. 

 

We currently face indirect competition for some of the point applications of our products, including some of those used byfrom the internal groups at IC companies. Specifically there are several supplierscompanies and direct competition from providers of (i) yield management and/or prediction systems, such as KLA-Tencor, Siemens AG (“Siemens”)(or Siemens), Rudolph Technologies,Onto Innovation, Inc. (“Rudolph”)(or Onto), and Synopsys, Inc., and Qualtera,; (ii) semiconductor manufacturing software, such as Applied Materials, Inc., BISTel Inc., Invantest, Inc., Optimal+NI, Inc., Rudolph,Onto, and Siemens and,Siemens; (iii) inline inspection, metrology and electrical test equipment providers, such as Applied Materials and Keysight Technologies, Inc. Further,; and, (iv) connectivity software or integration products/services supporting factory equipment connectivity or control needs of customers, such as PEER Group, Inc., Kontron AIS, GmbH, Yokogawa Electric Corp., and Kornic Automation Co. Ltd. There may be other providers of competitive commercial solutions of which we are not aware, and we may compete with the products or offerings of the samethese named companies or additional companies if we expand our offerings or they expand their offerings, through acquisition or development. For example, through our acquisition of Cimetrix in late 2020, we now face competition in the connectivity and integration products/services supporting factory equipment connectivity or control. The demand for solutions that address the need for better integration between the silicon design and manufacturing processes may encourage direct competitors to enter into our market. For example, in 2020, two of our competitors were acquired by larger entities, Synopsys, Inc. acquired Qualtera and NI, Inc. acquired Optimal+, which may enable greater investment or marketing of these competitive applications. This competition in our market may intensify in the future, which could lead to increased pricing pressure, negatively impacting our revenues, and slow our ability to grow or execute our strategy. Also, our current and potential customers may choose to develop their own solutions internally, particularly if we are slow in deploying our solutions or improving them to meet market needs. These and other competitors may be able to operate with a lower cost structure than our engineering organization, which would give any such competitor’s products a competitive advantage over our solutions.

 

We believe that our solutions compare favorably with respect to competition because we have demonstrated results and reputation, strong core technology, ability to create innovative technology, and ability to implement solutions for new technology and product generations. See the discussions in “Risk Factors” under Item 1A for more information about risks associated with our competition.

 

1011

Table of Contents

 

Employees

Information Security and Risk Oversight

We are heavily reliant on our technology and infrastructure, as well as the public cloud to an increasing degree, to provide our products and services to our customers. As a result, we have developed an information security program (referred to as our InfoSec Program) to enhance our network security measures, identify and mitigate information security risk, and protect and preserve the confidentiality, integrity, and continued availability of critical information owned by us and that of our customers and suppliers that is in our care. Our InfoSec Program includes development, implementation, and continual improvement of policies and procedures to safeguard information and ensure availability of critical data and systems. The program also includes annual information security awareness training for employees involved in our systems and processes that handle customer data and audits of our systems and enhanced training for specialized personnel. Our InfoSec Program further includes review and assessment by external, independent third-parties, who certify and report on our weaknesses and internal response preparedness with respect to the entire company. Accordingly, we have instituted periodic network access penetration (or PEN) testing on a regular basis after having completed, in September 2020, an initial, limited PEN test with no critical or high threats identified, and initiated an enterprise-wide PEN test beginning in November 2020. Also, in October 2020, we completed a Type 1 System and Organization Control (SOC 2) audit of our cloud-based offerings under the framework put forth by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) in which independent, third-party auditors assess and test controls relating to the Trust Services Criteria (TSC) of Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality or Privacy, and in February 2021, we initiated a Type 2 SOC 2 audit of our cloud-based offerings. To date, we have not managed ITAR-designated data, technology, or information. In accordance with our InfoSec Program, we also actively monitor known threats that could affect our products and services and work with our suppliers to provide us with real-time reports of threats or vulnerabilities that may affect our enterprise-wide systems. Our InfoSec Program also includes a cyber incident response plan that provides controls and procedures for timely and accurate reporting of any material cybersecurity incident.

As described in the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee Charter, the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee is tasked with oversight of certain risk issues, including cybersecurity. This Committee is comprised entirely of independent directors, two of whom have significant work experience related to information security issues or oversight. Management reports security instances to the Committee as they occur, if material, and provides a summary multiple times per year to the Committee as well as the full Board about periodic assessment of our information security program, our internal response preparedness, and assessments led by outside advisors. We carry insurance that provides some protection against the potential losses arising from a cybersecurity incident. In the last three years, the expenses we have incurred from information security breach incidences, including penalties and settlements, of which there were none, were immaterial.

Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Initiatives

The Audit and Corporate Governance Committee of our Board of Directors is sponsoring an effort to improve our ESG strategy. This includes work by a cross-functional ESG team of leaders representing operations, human resources, supply chain, regulatory compliance, finance, marketing communications, investor relations, facilities, and the legal department. As a preliminary result of the ESG team’s work, we have integrated the values of Cimetrix with ours and are in the process of company-wide communication of the formalized values as follows:

Integrity:

Team

Uphold the Highest Ethical Standards in everything we doTreat Everyone with Respect

Keep Our CommitmentsEncourage Open and Vibrant Communications

Safeguard Company IPPromote Creative Solutions

Move Forward Together

Growth:

Customers

Embrace Change and Drive InnovationProvide Passionate Dedication to Customer Success

Pursue Long-term Profitable GrowthDeliver the Highest Quality Products and Support

Take Responsibility for Personal GrowthFiercely Protect Customer IP

12

Table of Contents

As a further preliminary result of the ESG team’s initial assessment of our practices and policies and although we are not a member of the Responsible Business Alliance (or RBA) (formerly, the Electronics Industry Citizenship Coalition or EICC), our Board of Directors, on the recommendation of the Audit and Corporate Governance Committee, recently adopted the RBA Code of Conduct to supplement our Code of Ethics, including the specific policies of the  RBA Code relating to the five critical areas of corporate social responsibility: labor, health and safety, environment, management systems, and ethics. Guided by our above values and the following initial priorities, we believe we can achieve our business objectives and long-term stockholder value while doing our part in each of these areas. For additional information, see “Human Capital Management” in this Report below.

Care for Our People

We believe in upholding the principle of human rights, worker safety, and observing fair labor practices within our organization and our supply chain.

We embrace diverse viewpoints and perspectives, recognizing that greater inclusion fosters innovation and achieves better decision making and financial results. We intend to undertake actions around organizational training, formalized company values, and a revitalized recruitment strategy.

We are committed to ensuring that proper working conditions exist for the safety of our employees, such as developing, implementing, and continuously improving health and safety systems and conditions, and providing appropriate preparation, education, reporting, and controls. For example, we have Illness Prevention and Hazard Communication programs and an Emergency Action Plan for worker safety at our clean room facility.

Environmental Responsibility

We are committed to protecting the natural environment and our community by complying with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements. For example, in 2020 we began the process of ISO14001 certification of our clean room facility, which specifies the requirements for the formulation and maintenance of an environmental management systems (EMS) and a specific framework for implementing relevant sustainable practices.

We ask our employees to help us accomplish this by looking for opportunities to conserve energy, reduce consumption of natural resources, preserve air, soil, and water quality, manage waste properly, and reuse and recycle, and reduce the use of toxic substances in our operations where possible, including, in particular, in our clean room and lab facilities. Our clean room facility does not produce any off gas or emissions and the only reportable, hazardous material that we use at that facility is liquid nitrogen, which is in a tank external to our building and monitored using telematics by an independent third party specializing in such activity.

We look for ways to reduce energy consumption in our facilities around the world, including upgrades and or retrofits to LED and/or motion detector lighting and smart HVAC system.

Ethics & Corporate Responsibility

We are committed to ensuring ethical organizational governance, promoting business ethics and integrity, and embracing diversity, and inclusion in the board room and throughout the organization.

We are committed to observing fair, transparent, and accountable operating practices.

We seek to create and foster a healthy, balanced, and ethical work environment for everyone in our organization. To this end, we promote a positive work-life balance and ethical organizational culture and encourage all employees, regardless of position or level, to raise questions or concerns about actual or potential ethical issues and company policies and to offer suggestions about how we can make our organization better to address concerns.

We have a Whistleblower Ethics Hotline that includes global telephone and web access together with local language support. The web portal enables online reporting of concerns, where allowed by local law, and a place to ask questions or quickly access ethics and compliance policies.

We believe these efforts strengthen our ethics and compliance efforts and foster an environment where employees can express concerns and have them resolved.

In our view, the goals of providing value to stockholders and upholding the principle of human rights and treating people fairly and with dignity are integrally interconnected. We are committed to promoting equality and supporting racial justice in the communities where we do business.

13

Table of Contents

Supply Chain Responsibility

We intend to request that our suppliers adhere to the RBA Code of Conduct or its equivalent by flowing this requirement through our commercial contracts.

We also support Rule 13p-1 under the Exchange Act (known as the Conflict Minerals Law) and efforts to avoid sourcing conflict minerals that directly or indirectly finance or benefit armed groups in the Democratic Republic of Congo (or DRC) and in adjoining countries. Consistent with the Conflict Minerals Law and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance concerning conflict minerals, we adopted the Conflict Free Sourcing Initiative Due Diligence reporting process and seek to obtain conflict minerals content declarations from our suppliers each year, all in an effort to promote supply chain transparency. We do not directly source tin, tantalum, tungsten, or gold (collectively referred to as 3TG) from mines, smelters or refiners, and we are in most cases several or more levels removed from these supply chain participants.

We therefore expect:

o

our suppliers to source 3TG only from smelters and refiners validated as being conflict free and that do not directly or indirectly benefit or finance armed groups in the DRC or other covered country;

o

our suppliers to fully-comply with the Conflict Minerals Law and provide all necessary declarations;

o

our suppliers to pass these requirements through to their supply chain and determine the source and chain of custody of specified minerals, including 3TG; and

o

any suppliers not willing to comply with these requirements to be reviewed by global procurement with regard to future business and sourcing declarations. This conflict minerals policy encourages our suppliers to respect and protect human rights throughout the world.

Human Capital Management

We believe we have a responsibility to foster a healthy, balanced, and ethical work environment for everyone in our organization through sound ethical and organizational governance, by promoting business ethics and integrity, and by embracing equality, diversity, and inclusion throughout our organization and even extending to the board room. For additional information, see “Environmental, Social & Governance (ESG) Initiatives—Ethics & Corporate Responsibility,” in Part I, Item 1 of this Report.

From the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic, a cross-functional advisory team of company leaders has met almost daily to ensure that promoting the health and safety of our employees in accordance with the World Health Organization (WHO) and the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines remains a constant focal point. Early in the pandemic, we closed offices and restricted travel in compliance with local, State, and National requirements and also proactively asked employees around the world to work from home until further notice. While employees are working remotely, we have encouraged them to tell us what home office equipment and IT support they needed to set up a home office for healthy and productive work. For a small number of people that needed to be on-site at our clean room facility to support certain customers themselves providing essential services, we set up a strict COVID safety protocol that included a schedule to minimize contact, one-way traffic flows, dedicated personal protective equipment, virtual back-up safety monitoring, and regular, comprehensive cleaning of the facility. To stay connected while working remotely, beginning in April 2020, our Chief Executive Officer and other members of the executive team have led virtual, meetings twice a month with the various sales, research and development, engineering, and administrative teams to discuss developments and business updates and answer questions. For our offices in California, in anticipation of gradual reopening, we have implemented the new social distancing protocols for employee safety, such as attendance capacity, temperature checking requirements, 6-feet distancing, managed traffic flows, accessible hand sanitation stations throughout the office, and visitor prescreening. Other safety protocols have been put in place in worldwide offices when local regulations have allowed employees to be in the office, including eliminating eating in common areas, temperature taking upon arrival, limiting attendance in conference rooms, and providing and requiring appropriate masks to be worn while in the office.

We support employee action to protect the natural environment and the communities in which we operate through pollution prevention, conservation, responsible use, charitable giving, and sustainable practices. For example, we organize and engage employees in an annual charitable giving campaign. We work to ensure that our business practices support diversity and inclusion to build an innovative workforce and to strive toward having our organization reflect the complexion of our customers and suppliers. We are strengthening our diversity and inclusion programs with a planned set of actions around organizational training, formalized company values, and a revitalized recruitment strategy.

14

Table of Contents

 

As of December 31, 2018,2020, we had 365423 employees worldwide, including 219 on client service teams, 83206 field application engineers and consultants, 132 in research and development, 2641 in sales and marketing, and 3744 in general and administrative functions. Of these employees, 155224 are located in the United States and Canada, 174163 in Asia, and 36 in Europe.

 

None of our employees are represented by a labor union. Our employees in France and Italy are subject to collective bargaining agreements in those countries. We believe our relationship with our employees is good. Competition is intense in the recruiting of personnel in our industry. We believe that our future success will depend, in part, on our continued ability to hire and retain qualified management, marketingsales, and technical employees.

 

Information about our Executive Officers

 

The following table and notes set forth information about our current executive officers as of February 28, 2019.the date of this Form 10-K.

 

Name

Age

Position

John K. Kibarian, Ph.D.

54

57

President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director

Christine A. Russell

Adnan Raza

69

48

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

Kimon Michaels, Ph.D.

52

54

Executive Vice President, Products and Solutions

             

John K. Kibarian, Ph.D., one of our founders, has served as President since November 1991 and has served as our Chief Executive Officer since July 2000. Dr. Kibarian has served as a director since December 1992. Dr. Kibarian received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, an M.S. E.C.E. and a Ph.D. E.C.E. from Carnegie Mellon University.

 

Christine A. Russell,Adnan Raza, joined in July 2018January 2020 as Executive Vice President, Finance, and was appointed Chief Financial Officer effective August 10, 2018. Ms. Russell was designated an Executive VP in February 2019.March 2020.  Prior to joining the Company, Ms. RussellMr. Raza served as Chief Financial Officer, UniPixel,an independent strategy consultant for private and public companies from July 2019 to January 2020.  Prior to that, Mr. Raza served in various roles at Synaptics Inc. (Nasdaq:UNXL), a touch sensor company,developer of human interface technologies, including as Senior Vice President of Corporate Development from MayAugust 2017 to June 2019 and Vice President of Corporate Development from February 2015 to August 2017. Prior to UniPixel, she was Chief Financial Officer of Vendavo, Inc. from May 2014 to March 2015, a SaaS based pricingroles include technology investment banking at Goldman, Sachs & Co. and margin optimization software company. SheUBS Investment Bank, strategic advising at Blackreef Capital, engineering and marketing at Azanda Network Devices, and engineering at Lucent Technologies.  Mr. Raza also served as Chief Financial Officera Board Member at FIDO Alliance, an alliance of Evans Analytical Group from May 2009 to September 2013, a global provider of analytical testing forleading technology companies including major semiconductor, chemicalsto enhance user security and pharmaceuticals firms. Prior to EAG, she served in the roles of both Chief Financial Officer and EVP Business Development at Virage Logic (Nasdaq:VIRL), a semiconductor intellectual property company. Prior positions include Chief Financial Officer for OuterBay Technologies, a database archiving software company and Chief Financial Officer of Ceva, Inc. (Nasdaq: CEVA), a DSP IP company. She currently serves as Audit Committee Chair and Director for both QuickLogic Corporation and eGain Corporation. Ms. Russellauthentication. Mr. Raza holds a B.A. and M.B.A. from The Wharton School at the University of Santa Clara.Pennsylvania, a M. Eng. in Electrical Engineering from Cornell University, and a B.S. in Electrical Engineering from Valparaiso University.

 

Kimon Michaels, Ph.D., one of our founders, has served as Vice President, Products and Solutions since July 2010 and was designated as an Executive VP in February 2019. Dr. Michaels served as Vice President, Design for Manufacturability from June 2007 through June 2010. Prior to that, Dr. Michaels served as Vice President, Field Operations for Manufacturing Process Solutions from January 2006 through May 2007, and has been a Director since November 1995. From March 1993 through December 2005, he served in various vice presidential capacities. He also served as Chief Financial Officer from November 1995 to July 1998. Dr. Michaels received a B.S. in Electrical Engineering, anand M.S. E.C.E. and a Ph.D. E.C.E. from Carnegie Mellon UniversityUniversity.

 

Available Information

 

We file or furnish various reports, such as registration statements, periodic and current reports, proxy statements and other materials with the SEC. Our Internet website address is www.pdf.com. You may obtain, free of charge on our website, copies of our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the SEC.  The Company's website address provided is not intended to function as a hyperlink, and the information on the Company's website is not, and should not be considered, part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference herein.

 

The SEC maintains a Web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers, such as us, that file electronically with the SEC. 

 

1115

Table of Contents

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

 

Risks Associated with Our Business

We generate most ofinvest significant resources into research and development to pursue new product and technology initiatives, including our revenues from a limited number ofcustomers,DFI system and a large percentage ofExensio platform, and if we invest more resources in research and development than anticipated or fail to successfully carry out these initiatives on the expected timeline or at all, our revenues from a singlecustomer, so decreased business, with,financial condition, or the loss of, any one of these customers, or pricing pressure, or customer consolidation could significantly reduce ourrevenue or margins, negatively impact results of operations could be adversely impacted.

As part of the evolution of our business, we have made substantial investments in research and development efforts to develop new products, including our DFI system and Exensio cloud-based platform, as well continued investment to enhance existing products. New competitors, technological advances in the semiconductor industry or by competitors, our entry into new markets, or other competitive factors may require us to accept lower margin business on future nodes.

Historically,invest significantly greater resources than we have hadanticipate. If we are required to invest significantly greater resources than anticipated without a small number of large customers forcorresponding increase in revenue, our core solutionsoperating results could decline. The technologies or products that we invest in may later not be sought after by semiconductor companies. In this event, we would not recoup our investment and that contribute significant Gainshare performance incentives revenue. In the year ended December 31, 2018, one customer, GlobalFoundries, accounted for 37% of our revenues. We could lose a customer due to its decision not to engage us on future process nodes, its decision to reduce the scope of our services or technology used, which is permitted in certain of our contracts if the customer company's business materially adversely changes, its decision not to develop its own future process node, or as a result of industry factors, including but not limited to consolidation. During the third quarter of 2018, a major customer announced that it was suspending indefinitely the development and production of its 7nm technology node. This customer’s decision negatively impacted our Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenues in the fourth quarter of 2018. Gainshare performance incentives revenues will be negatively affected in the long-term as Gainshare performance incentives revenues are based on future production of the customer. Consolidation among our customers could also lead to increased customer bargaining power, or reduced customer spending on software and services. Further, new business may be delayed if a key customer uses its leverage to push for terms that are worse for us and we nonetheless continue to negotiate for better terms, in which case Solutions revenue in any particular quarter or year may fail to meet expectations. Also, the loss of any of these customers or the failure to secure new contracts with these customers could further increase our reliance on our remaining customers. Further, if any of our key customers default, declare bankruptcy or otherwise delay or fail to pay amounts owed, or we otherwise have a dispute with any of these customers, our results of operations would be negatively affected in the short term and possibly the long term. These customers may seek to renegotiate pre-existing contractual commitments due to adverse changes in their own businesses, which would harm our operating results. These events could cause significant fluctuations in results of operations because our expenses are fixed in the short term and it takes us a long time to replace customers or reassign resources

suffer. If we are unable to completeanticipate technological changes in our industry by introducing new or enhanced products in a timely and cost-effective manner, or if we fail to introduce products that meet market demand, we may lose our competitive position, our products may become obsolete, and our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected. Additionally, our periodic research and development and qualification expenses may be independent of our e-beam measurement tool for inline wafer inspection on schedulelevel of revenue, which could negatively impact our financial results.

Our sales cycle is lengthy and customers may delay entering into contracts or at all, or successfully commercialize our Design-for-Inspection (DFI) solution, our future market opportunity and revenues will suffer and our costs maydecide not be recouped.

Certain use cases of our DFI solution remain to be proven, and the inline version still needs to be qualified by the first commercial customer. To date, we have invested significantly in the design and development of our DFI eProbe tool and related intellectual property. If existing foundry customers fail to renew or expand the number or use of the systems they are using, or new foundry customers fail to adopt our DFI solution, our results will suffer. For example, in 2018 an early adopterproducts or solutions after we have performed services or supported evaluation by them of our DFI solution at 7nm elected to exercise an early exit under the contract in connection with its decision to suspend indefinitely further development and production at 7nm, which negatively impacted the long-term revenue we expected under this contract and possibility for renewal or expansion. Also, if the results of our DFI solution are not as we expect, we may not be able to successfully commercialize these technologies on schedule, or at all, and we may miss the market opportunity and not recoup our investment. Further, our DFI tool may cause unexpected damage to wafers or delay processing wafers, which we could be liable for, or which may make customers unwilling to use it. If we are not able to create significant interest and show reliable and useful results, our investment may not be recouped and our future results may suffer.

12

Table of Contents

Decreases in wafer volumes at our customers’ manufacturing sites or the volume of ICs that some of our customers are ableto sell to their customers would cause our Gainshare performance incentives revenue to suffer.

Our Gainshare performance incentives revenue is largely determined by wafer volumes at manufacturing sites covered by our contracts and, in some cases, the volume of an IC product that our customer is able to sell to its customers. Both of these factors are outside of our control. Further, some of our manufacturing customers’ business is largely dependent on customers that use our manufacturing customer as a second or third source. If those customers consolidate and/or otherwise move the orders to manufacturing facilities not covered by our contracts, or suspend their manufacturing at covered facilities for any reason, including consolidation, our Gainshare revenue will decrease. Reduced demand for semiconductor products decreases the volume of wafers and, in some cases, products our customers are able to sell, which would also directly decrease our Gainshare revenue. For example, 28nm volumes were lower in 2018 than expected. Also, our customers may unilaterally decide to implement changes to their manufacturing processes during the period that is covered by Gainshare,technology, which could result in delays in recognizing revenue and negatively affect yield results and our revenue. Since we currently work on a small number of large projects at specified manufacturing sites and, in some cases, on specific IC products,impact our results of operations are adversely affected by negative changesin a quarter or result in lower revenue than we expected if a contract is not consummated at those sitesall.

On-going negotiations and evaluation projects for new products, with new customers or in those products. For example,new markets may not result in significant revenues for us if wafer orders from sites covered bywe are unable to close new engagements on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner, or at all. Unexpected delays in our contractssales cycle could cause our revenues to fall short of expectations. Further, the timing and length of negotiations required to enter into agreements with our customers and the ultimate enforcement of complex negotiated contractual provisions as we intended is difficult to predict. If we do not successfully negotiate certain key complex contractual provisions, there are disputes regarding such provisions, or they are not secured byenforceable as we intended, our customers, if an end product does not achieve commercial viability, if a process line or, in some cases, a specific product, does not achieve significant increases in yield or sustain significant volume manufacturing during the time we receive Gainshare, revenues associated with such volumes or products would be negatively impacted. This could significantly reduce our revenue and results of operations below expectations. In addition, ifwould suffer. Further, our customers sometimes delay starting negotiations until they begin developing a new process, need to insert a new product, or experience specific yield issues. This means that on occasion we work with two directly competitive manufacturing facilities or products, volume in onehave, and may offset volume, and thus any of our related Gainshare, in the other facility or product.

If semiconductor designers and manufacturers and their suppliersdo not continue to adopt, or they significantly delay adoptionprovide technology and services under preliminary documentation before executing the final contract. In these cases, we would not recognize revenue and may defer associated costs until execution of ourproducts and solutions, ourrevenues will suffer.

If semiconductor designers and manufacturers and their suppliers do not continue to adopt our products and solutions, both as currently comprised and as we may offer them in the future, our revenues will decline. We may not be successfulfinal contract, which, if we do not continue to enter into long-term agreements with existing customers and new customers that cover a larger number of IC products, processes, or manufacturing and test/assembly facilities. If we do not continue to develop customer relationships with companies that are integrated device manufacturers (or IDMs), fabless semiconductor companies, foundries, and out-sourced assembly and test companies (or OSATs), as well as system houses, the market acceptance of our solutions will suffer. Factors that may limit adoption of our products and solutions by semiconductor companies include:

our existing and potential customers’ delay in their adoption or suspension of the current or next process technology including derivatives of older nodes;

our inability to keep pace with the rapidly evolving technologies and equipment used in the semiconductor design and manufacturing processes;

our inability to convince foundry customer to adopt or expand adoption of DFI solution or fabless customers to include our on-chip measurement devices in tape outs;

our customers’ failure to achieve satisfactory results using our solutions;

the lack of proven results with new technologies and solutions that we may develop; and

our inability to develop, market, or sell effective solutions that are outside of our traditional logic focus of manufacturing process solutions, for example, 3-D memory processes or our DFI IP and hardware technology.

The semiconductor market is volatile and unpredictable and is exacerbated by economic uncertainty, which limits our ability to forecast our business andsignificant, could negatively impact our results of operations.operations in the periods before we execute the final contract. Further, if we were to incur significant effort and then fail to enter into a final contract, we would have to write-off such deferred costs in the period in which the negotiations ended, which would decrease our costs and expenses and could result in significant operating losses.

 

The semiconductor industry historically has been volatile with up cycles and down cycles, due to sudden changes in customers’ manufacturing capacity requirements and spending, which depend in part on capacity utilization, demand for customers’ IC products by consumers, inventory levels relative to demand, and access to affordable capital. As a result of the various factors that affect this volatility, the timing and length of any cycles can be difficult to predict. Economic uncertainty exacerbates negative trends in consumer spending and can cause some of our customers to delayOur fixed-fee services or refrain altogether from entering into new engagements, licensing new or additional software products, or renewing maintenance and support for existing licensed software. Difficulties in obtaining capital and deteriorating market conditions may also lead to the inability of some customers to obtain affordable financing for other purchases, which could tie up funds otherwise budgeted for purchases of our solutions and technologies. For example, the timing of the build-out of the semiconductor market in China depends significantly on governmental funding on both local and national levels and a delay in this funding could negatively affect our revenues. Any of these events could negatively affect our revenues and make it challenging for us to forecast our operating results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. Customers with liquidity issues may also lead to additional bad debt expense.

13

Table of Contents

Our solution implementationsproduct or system installation/configurations may take longer than budgeted, which could slow our revenue recognition and may also result in a loss contract or a claim of breach by our customers, which would negatively affect our operating results.

Our solution implementationsfixed-fee services, including in particular IYR, require a team of engineers to collaborate with our customers to address complex issues by using our software and other technologies, and the installation and configuration of our software into our customers’ fabrication and test/assembly facilities requires experienced engineers working with our customers on active foundry and test/assembly equipment. We must estimate the amount of resources needed to complete both of these types of services in order to estimate when the engineers will be able to commence the next engagement. In addition, our accounting for contracts with such services, which generate fixed fees, sometimes requires adjustments to profit (loss) based on revised estimates during the performance of the contract. These adjustments may have a material effect on our results of operations in the period in which they are made. The estimates giving rise to these risks, which are inherent in fixed-price contracts, include the forecasting of costs and schedules, and contract revenues related to contract performance.

Our sales cycle is lengthy and customers may delay entering into contracts or decide notIf we significantly fail to adoptmeet a customer’s expectations in either case, the customer could claim that we breached our products or solutions after we have performed services or provided evaluation licenses,obligations, which could result in delayslost revenue and increased expenses.

16

Our ability to sell our products, systems, and solutions depends in recognizing revenuepart on the quality of our support and services offerings, and the failure to offer high-quality support and services could negatively affect our sales and results of operations.

Once our products are integrated within our customers’ hardware and software systems, our customers may depend on our support organization to resolve any issues relating to our products. Further, in connection with delivering our SaaS, which requires us to maintain adequate server hardware and internet infrastructure, including system redundancies, we are required to meet contractual uptime obligations. A high level of system and support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of our products. If we do not effectively provide subscription access to our SaaS customers, assist our customers in deploying our products, succeed in helping our customers quickly resolve post-deployment issues, and provide effective ongoing support and data security, we may face contractual penalties or customers may not renew subscriptions or services in the future, which would negatively impact our results of operations. In addition, due to our international operations, our system and support organization faces challenges associated with delivering support, hours that support is available, training, and documentation where the user’s native language may not be English. If we fail to maintain high-quality support and services and adequately address our customers’ support needs, our customers may choose our competitors’ products instead of ours in the future, which would negatively affect our revenues and results of operations.

Defects in our proprietary technologies, hardware and software tools, and failure to effectively remedy any such defects could decrease our revenue and our competitive market share.

If the software, hardware, or proprietary technologies we provide to customers contain defects that negatively impact customers' ability to use our systems or software, increase our customers’ cost of goods sold and time-to-market, or damage our customers’ property, these defects could significantly decrease the market acceptance of our products and services or results in warranty or other claims. We must adequately train our new personnel, especially our customer service and technical support personnel, to effectively and accurately, respond to and support our customers. If we fail to do this, it could lead to dissatisfaction among our customers, which could slow our growth. Further, the cost of support resources required to remedy any defects in our technologies, hardware, or software tools could exceed our expectations. Any actual or perceived defects with our software, hardware, or proprietary technologies may also hinder our ability to attract or retain industry partners or customers, leading to a decrease in our revenue. These defects are frequently found during the period following introduction of new software, hardware, or proprietary technologies or enhancements to existing software, hardware, or proprietary technologies, which means that we may not discover the errors or defects until after customer implementation of the silicon design and manufacturing process recommended by us. If our software, hardware, or proprietary technologies contain errors or defects, it could require us to expend significant resources to remedy these problems or defend/indemnify claims, which could reduce margins and result in the diversion of technical and other resources from our other customer implementations and development efforts. 

Inadvertent disclosure of our customers’ confidential information or our failure to comply with our customers’ security rules, including for cloud-based solutions or on-site access could result in costly litigation, cause us to lose existing and potential customers, or negatively impact on-going business with existing customers.

Our customers consider their product yield information and other confidential information, which we must collect in the course of our engagement with the customer or through our software tools, to be extremely competitively sensitive or subject to strict protection frameworks, including data and personal data about our customers’ employees necessary to administer the licenses. Many of our customers have strict security rules for on-site access to, or hosting, to their confidential information. If we suffered an unauthorized intrusion or we inadvertently disclosed or were required to disclose this information, or if we fail to adequately comply with customers’ security protocols for accessing or hosting confidential information, we could lose existing and potential customers or be subject to costly penalties or litigation, or our on-going business could be negatively impacted and insurance to cover such situations may not fully cover our exposure. In addition, to avoid potential disclosure of confidential information to competitors, some of our customers may, in the future, ask us not to work with key products or processes, which could limit our revenue opportunities.

We generate a significant portion of our revenues from a limited number of customers, and a large percentage of our revenues from a single customer, so decreased business with, or the loss of, any one of these customers, or pricing pressure, or customer consolidation could significantly reduce our revenues or margins and negatively impact results of operations.

Historically, we have had a small number of large customers for our IYR solutions and that contribute significant Gainshare royalties. In the year ended December 31, 2020, one customer, GlobalFoundries, accounted for 23% of our revenues. We have in the past and could in the future lose a customer due to its decision not to develop or produce its own future process node. Customers

17

could also choose to not engage us on future process nodes, or reduce the scope of our services or technology under contract (which is permitted in one of our customer contracts if the customer’s business materially adversely changes).We could also lose customers as a result of industry factors, including but not limited to reduced manufacturing volume or consolidation. Consolidation among our customers could also lead to increased customer bargaining power, or reduced customer spending on software and services. Further, new business may be delayed if a key customer uses its leverage to push for terms that are worse for us and we delay entering into the contract to negotiate for better terms, in which case revenue in any particular quarter or year may fail to meet expectations. Also, the loss of any of these customers or the failure to secure new contracts with these customers could further increase our reliance on our remaining customers. Further, if any of our key customers default, declare bankruptcy or otherwise delay or fail to pay amounts owed, or we otherwise have a dispute with any of these customers, our results of operations would be negatively affected in the short term and possibly the long term. For example, in 2020, we incurred expenses in the amount of $1.1 million related to the arbitration with SMIC New Technology Research & Development (Shanghai) Corporation due to SMIC’s failure to pay fees due to us under a series of contracts. If we are not able to resolve this matter amicably in the near future, we will incur substantial additional expenses related to resolution of this matter through arbitration. These events could cause significant fluctuations in results of operations because our expenses are fixed in the short term and it takes us a long time to replace customers or reassign resources.

If we do not continuously meet our development milestones of key research and development projects or successfully commercialize our Design-for-Inspection system, our future market opportunity and revenues will suffer and our costs may not be recouped.

Certain use cases of our DFI system remain to be proven. To date, we have invested significantly in the design and development of our eProbe tool and related intellectual property. Key customers failing to purchase, renew, or expand the number or use of such systems on our expected timeline or at all will cause our results to miss expectations. For example, in 2020, a key DFI customer decided not to continue with contractual milestones or to renew the eProbe for our standard DFI application at the expiration of the contract, which resulted in lower DFI-related revenue in 2020. Also, if the results of our DFI system, including new applications, are not as we expect, we may not be able to successfully commercialize this system or such applications on schedule, or at all, and we may miss the market opportunity and not recoup our investment. Further, our eProbe tool could cause unexpected damage to wafers or delay processing wafers, which we could be liable for, or which could make customers unwilling to use it. If we are not able to create significant interest and show reliable and useful results without significant damage to wafers, our investment may not be recouped and our future results may suffer.

Decreases in wafer volumes at our customers’ manufacturing sites or the volume of ICs that some of our customers are ableto sell to their customers would cause our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue to suffer.

Our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue includes amounts largely determined by wafer volumes at manufacturing sites covered by our contracts and, in some cases, the volume of an IC product that our customer is able to sell to its customers. Both of these factors are outside of our control. Further, some of our manufacturing customers’ business is largely dependent on customers that use our manufacturing customer as a second or third source. If those customers consolidate and/or otherwise move the orders to manufacturing facilities not covered by our contracts, or suspend their manufacturing at covered facilities for any reason, including consolidation, our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue will decrease, which could cause us to fail to meet expectations. Further, reduced demand for semiconductor products or protectionist policies has from time to time decreased and may continue to decrease the volume of wafers and, in some cases, products our customers are able to make or sell, which would also decrease our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue. Also, our customers may unilaterally decide to implement changes to their manufacturing processes during the period that volume is covered by royalty contracts, which could negatively affect yield results and, thus, our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue.

Since we currently work on a small number of large projects at specified manufacturing sites and, in some cases, on specific IC products, our results of operations have been and may continue to be adversely affected by negative changes at those sites or in those products, including slowdowns in manufacturing due to external factors, such as U.S. trade restrictions and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in China. Also, if wafer orders from sites covered by our contracts are not secured by our customers, if an end product does not achieve commercial viability, if a process line or, in some cases, a specific product, does not achieve significant increases in yield or sustain significant volume manufacturing during the time we receive royalties, revenues associated with such volumes or products would be negatively impacted. This could significantly reduce our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue and results of operations could fail to meet expectations. In addition, if we work with two directly competitive manufacturing facilities or products, volume in one may offset volume, and thus any of our related revenue, in the other facility or product.

18

Our success depends upon our ability to effectively plan and manage our resources and restructure our business through rapidly fluctuating economic and market conditions, which actions may have an adverse effect on our financial and operating results.

Our ability to successfully offer our products and services in a quarterrapidly evolving market requires an effective planning, forecasting, and management process to enable us to effectively scale and adjust our business and business models in response to fluctuating market opportunities and conditions, which has and could continue to require us to increase headcount, acquire new companies or resultengage in lower revenue thanrestructurings from time to time. For example, while we have increased investment in our business by, for example, increasing headcount, acquiring companies, and increasing our investment in R&D, sales and marketing, and other parts of our business from time to time, including 2018, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce expenses and align our operations with evolving business needs. Some of our expenses related to such efforts are fixed costs that cannot be rapidly or easily adjusted in response to fluctuations in our business or numbers of employees. Rapid changes in the size, alignment or organization of our workforce, including sales account coverage, could adversely affect our ability to develop and deliver products and services as planned or impair our ability to realize our current or future business and financial objectives. Our ability to achieve the anticipated cost savings and other benefits from our restructuring initiatives within the expected if a contracttime frame is not consummated at all.

On-going negotiationssubject to many estimates and evaluation projects for new products, with new customers or in new markets may not result inassumptions, which are subject to significant revenues for useconomic, competitive and other uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. If these estimates and assumptions are incorrect, if we are unable to close new engagements on terms favorable to us, in a timely manner,unsuccessful at implementing changes, or at all. Unexpected delays inif other unforeseen events occur, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Global economic conditions or semiconductor market conditions could materially adversely impact demand for our products and services, decrease our sales, cycleor delay our sales cycle.

Our customers are global semiconductor companies, which means that our operations and performance depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions as well as semiconductor market specific changes. Uncertainty about global economic conditions could result in customers postponing purchases of our products and services, including in response to tighter credit, unemployment, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values and other macroeconomic factors, which could have a material negative effect on demand for our products and services and, accordingly, on our business, results of operations or financial condition. For example, the timing of the build-out of the semiconductor market in China depends significantly on governmental funding on both local and national levels and a delay in this funding could negatively affect our revenues. For further example, any economic and political uncertainty caused by the United States tariffs imposed on goods from China, among other potential countries, and any corresponding tariffs from China or such other countries in response, may negatively impact demand and/or increase the cost for our products.  Similarly, the COVID-19 pandemic in China or in other nations has and may continue to cause a slowdown in the global economy and demand for our revenuesproducts and services. Further, the semiconductor industry historically has been volatile with up cycles and down cycles, due to fall shortsudden changes in customers’ manufacturing capacity requirements and spending, which depend in part on capacity utilization, demand for customers’ IC products by consumers, inventory levels relative to demand, and access to affordable capital. As a result of expectations. Further,the various factors that affect this volatility, the timing and length of negotiations required to enter into agreements with our customers and the ultimate enforcement of complex negotiated contractual provisions as we intended isany cycles can be difficult to predict. If we do not successfully negotiate certain key complex contractual provisions, there are disputes regarding such provisions or they are not enforced as we intended, the future available market for our solutionspredict and could decrease andbe longer than anticipated. Any of these events could negatively affect our revenues and make it challenging for us to forecast our operating results, make business decisions, and identify the risks that may affect our business, financial condition and results of operations would suffer. Further, our customers sometimes delay starting negotiations until they begin developing a new process, needoperations. Customers with liquidity issues may also lead to insert a new product, or experience specific yield issues. This means that on occasion we have, and may continue to provide technology and services under preliminary documentation before executing the final contract. In these cases, we would not recognize revenue and would defer associated costs until execution of the final contract, which, if significant, could negatively impact our results of operations in the periods before we execute the final contract. Further, if we were to incur significant effort and then fail to enter into a final contract, we would have to write-off such deferred costs in the period in which the negotiations ended, which would decrease our gross margin and could result in significant operating losses. additional bad debt expense.

 

 Risks Related to Our Technology

If we fail to protect our intellectual property rights, customers or potentialcompetitors may be able to use our technologies to develop their own solutions, whichcould weaken our competitive position, reduce our revenue,revenues, or increase our costs.

 

Our success depends largely on the proprietary nature of our technologies. Our contractual, patent, copyright, trademark, and trade secret protection may not be effective against any particular threat or in any particular location. Our pending patent applications may not result in issued patents, and even if issued, they may not be sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary technologies. Some foreign countries do not currently provide effective legal protection for intellectual property and our ability to prevent the unauthorized use of our products in those countries is therefore limited. Our trade secrets may also be stolen, otherwise become known, or be independently developed by competitors. Litigation may be necessary from time to time to enforce our IP rights or to determine the validity and scope of the proprietary rights of others.rights. As a result of any such litigation, we could lose our proprietary rights and incur substantial unexpected operating costs. Litigation could also divert our resources, including our managerial and engineering resources. If we are unable to exclude others from using our proprietary technologies and methods without compensation to us, through litigation or otherwise, it could impede our ability to grow our business and our revenues may suffer.

 

We pursue new product and technology initiatives, including our DFI solution and Exensio platform, from time to time, and if we fail to successfully carry out these initiatives, our business, financial condition, or results of operations could be adversely impacted.

As part of the evolution of our business, we have made substantial investments to develop new products, including our DFI solution and Exensio platform, and enhancements to existing products through our research and development efforts. If we are unable to anticipate technological changes in our industry by introducing new or enhanced products in a timely and cost-effective manner, or if we fail to introduce products that meet market demand, we may lose our competitive position, our products may become obsolete, and our business, financial condition or results of operations could be adversely affected.

1419

Table of Contents

 

We may have to invest more resources in research and development than anticipated, which could increase our operating expenses and negatively affect our operating results.

We devote substantial resources to research and development. New competitors, technological advances in the semiconductor industry or by competitors, our entry into new markets, or other competitive factors may require us to invest significantly greater resources than we anticipate. If we are required to invest significantly greater resources than anticipated without a corresponding increase in revenue, our operating results could decline. Additionally, our periodic research and development expenses may be independent of our level of revenue, which could negatively impact our financial results. Finally, there can be no guarantee that our research and development investments will result in products that create additional revenue.

We face operational and financial risks associated with international operations thatcould negatively impact our revenue.

We derive over half of our revenue from sales outside of the United States, and we expect our international business to continue to grow, in particular in China. We have in the past expanded and reorganized, at different times, our non-U.S. operations and may in the future continue such expansion or reorganization by establishing or restructuring international subsidiaries, offices, or contractor relationships in locations, if and when, deemed appropriate by our management. Thus, the success of our business is subjectexposed to risks inherent in doing business internationally, including in particular:  

our growth in China is dependent upon continued investments in the semiconductor industry by both private and public entities within China. Should circumstances change such that the level of investments are substantially reduced, our future growth potential may be limited;

some of our key engineers and other personnel are foreign nationals and they may not be permitted access to certain technical information under U.S. export laws or by certain of our customers and may have difficulty gaining access to the United States and other countries in which our customers or our offices may be located and it may be difficult for us to recruit and retain qualified technical and managerial employees in foreign offices;

ineffective or inadequate protection or enforcement of our intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions;

greater difficulty in collecting account receivables resulting in longer collection periods or bad debt;

language and other cultural differences may inhibit our sales and marketing efforts and create internal communication problems among our U.S. and foreign teams, increasing the difficulty of managing multiple, remote locations performing various development, quality assurance, and yield ramp analysis projects;

compliance with, inconsistencies among, and unexpected changes in, a wide variety of foreign laws and regulatory environments with which we are not familiar, including, among other issues, with respect to employees, personal data, tax, protection of our IP, and a wide variety of operational regulations and trade and export controls under domestic, foreign, and international law;

currency risk due to the fact that certain of our payables and for our international offices are denominated in the foreign currency, including the Euro, Yen, and RMB, while virtually all of our revenues is denominated in U.S. dollars, or in the event a larger portion of our revenues becomes denominated in foreign currencies, we would be subject to a potentially significant exchange rate risk;

inadequate local infrastructure that could result in business disruptions;

additional taxes, interest, and potential penalties, and uncertainty around changes in tax laws of various countries;

quarantine, private travel limitation, or business disruption in regions affecting our operations, stemming from actual, imminent or perceived outbreak of human pandemic or contagious disease; or

economic or political instability, including but not limited to armed conflict, terrorism, interference with information or communication of networks or systems, and the resulting disruption to economic activity and business operations. 

15

Table of Contents

Further, our employees and contractors include professionals located in various international locations, including Shanghai, China, who provide primarily CV test chip-related services, and Ramallah, Palestine, who provide software-related development, quality assurance, maintenance, and other technical support services for certain of our software products. Political changes, including policies regarding export control, that affect these or other international operations could disrupt or limit the work our employees and contractors are able to perform, and thus negatively affect the range of services we are able to provide our customers or our cost for such services.

In addition, our global operations are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to anti-corruption, tax, corporate governance, importsinformation technology infrastructure, information management and exports, financialprotection, cybersecurity threats, and other disclosures, privacy and labor relations. These laws and regulations are complex and may have differing or conflicting legal standards, making compliance difficult and costly. In addition, there is uncertainty regarding how proposed, contemplated or future changes to these complex laws and regulations could affect our business. We may incur substantial expense in complying with the new obligations to be imposed by these laws and regulations, and we may be required to make significant changes in our business operations, all of which may adversely affect our revenues and our business overall. If we violate these laws and regulations we could be subject to fines, penalties or criminal sanctions, and may be prohibited from conducting business in one or more countries. Although we have implemented policies and procedures to help ensure compliance with these laws and regulations, there can be no assurance that our employees, contractors, agents or partners will not violate such laws and regulations. Any violation individually or in the aggregate could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition.

Inadvertent disclosure of our customers’ confidential information or our failure to comply with our client’s security rulescyber incidents., including for hosted solutions or on-site access could result in costly litigation, cause us to lose existing and potential customers, or negatively impact on-going business with existing customers.

Our customers consider their product yield information and other confidential information, which we must collect in the course of our engagement with the customer or through our software tools, to be extremely competitively sensitive. Many of our clients have strict security rules for on-site access to, or hosting, to their confidential information. If we inadvertently disclosed or were required to disclose this information, or if we fail to adequately comply with customers’ security protocols for accessing or hosting confidential information, we would likely lose existing and potential customers, could be subject to costly litigation, or our on-going business could be negatively impacted. In addition, to avoid potential disclosure of confidential information to competitors, some of our customers may, in the future, ask us not to work with key products or processes, which could limit our revenue opportunities.

Our ability to sell our products may depend on the quality of our support and services offerings, including delivering of software as a service (SaaS), and our failure to offer high-quality support and services could negatively affect our sales and results of operations.

Once our software products are integrated within our customers’ hardware and software systems, our customers may depend on our support organization to resolve any issues relating to our products. Further, in connection with delivering our software as a service, which requires us to maintain adequate server hardware and internet infrastructure, including system redundancies, we will need to meet contractual uptime obligations. A high level of system and support is critical for the successful marketing and sale of our products. If we do not effectively provide subscription access to our SaaS customers, assist our customers in deploying our products, succeed in helping our customers quickly resolve post-deployment issues, and provide effective ongoing support and data security, our ability to sell our software products to existing customers may be negatively affected, our results of operations could be negatively impacted if we must provide credits for system downtime, and our reputation with potential customers could be harmed. If our software customers have a poor perception of our support and services offerings, they may choose not to purchase via SaaS, renew software support and maintenance or term-based licenses when the current period expires. In addition, due to our international operations, our system and support organization faces challenges associated with delivering support, hours that support is available, training, and documentation where the user’s native language may not be English. If we fail to maintain high-quality support and services, our customers may choose our competitors’ products instead of ours in the future, which would negatively affect our revenues and results of operations.

16

Table of Contents

Defects in our proprietary technologies, hardware and software tools, and failure to effectively remedy any such defects could decrease our revenue and our competitivemarket share.

If the software, hardware, or proprietary technologies we provide to a customer contain defects that negatively impact customers' ability to use our solutions or software, increase our customers’ cost of goods sold and time-to-market or damage our customers’ property, these defects could significantly decrease the market acceptance of our solutions or results in warranty or other claims. We must adequately train our new personnel, especially our client service and technical support personnel, to effectively and accurately, respond to and support our customers. If we fail to do this, it could lead to dissatisfaction among our customers, which could slow our growth. Further, the cost of support resources required to remedy any defects in our technologies, hardware, or software tools could exceed our expectations. Any actual or perceived defects with our software, hardware, or proprietary technologies may also hinder our ability to attract or retain industry partners or customers, leading to a decrease in our revenue. These defects are frequently found during the period following introduction of new software, hardware, or proprietary technologies or enhancements to existing software, hardware, or proprietary technologies. Our software, hardware, and proprietary technologies may contain errors not discovered until after customer implementation of the silicon design and manufacturing process recommended by us. If our software, hardware, or proprietary technologies contain errors or defects, it could require us to expend significant resources to remedy these problems or defend/indemnify claims, which could reduce margins and result in the diversion of technical and other resources from our other customer implementations and development efforts. 

If we do not effectively manage, support, and safeguard our worldwide information systems, and integrate recent andplanned growth, our business strategy may fail.

 

We are heavily reliant on our technology and infrastructure, as well as the public cloud to an increasing degree, to provide our products and services to our customers. We have experienced in the past, and may experience in the future, interruptions in our information systems on which our global operations depend. We may in the future experience unplanned downtime of the infrastructure that delivers our SaaS products. Further, we may face attempts by others to gain unauthorized access through the Internet to our information technology systems whether hosted by us or service providers, to intentionally hack, interfere with, or cause physical or digital damage to or failure of such systems (such as significant viruses or worms), which attempts we or they may be unable to prevent. Our security measures may also be breached due to employee errors, malfeasance, or otherwise. Despite our ongoing efforts to enhance our network security measures, our information systems are susceptible to computer viruses, cyber-related security breaches and similar disruptions from unauthorized intrusions, tampering, misuse, criminal acts, including phishing, or other events or developments that we may be unable to anticipate or fail to mitigate and are subject to the inherent vulnerabilities of network security measures. For example, in the first quarter of 2020, one of our cloud installations suffered an intrusion due to a vulnerability discovered and published by the provider of the Citrix ADC that was part of our installation. Third parties may also attempt to influence employees, users, suppliers or customers to disclose sensitive information in order to gain access to our, our customers’ or business partners’ data. Additionally, third parties with whom we work, such as vendors or developers, may violate applicable laws or our policies and such violations can place personal information of our customers at risk.

We or our service providers could be unaware of an incident or its magnitude and effects until after it is too late to prevent it and the damage it may cause. Further, because the techniques used to obtain unauthorized access to the information systems change frequently, and may not be recognized until launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures.

The theft, unauthorized use, or a cybersecurity attack that results in the publication of our trade secrets and other confidential business information as a result of such an incident could negatively affect our competitive position, the value of our investment in product or research and development, and third parties might assert against us or our customers claims related to resulting losses of confidential or proprietary information or end-user data and/or system reliability. We carry insurance that provides some protection against the potential losses arising from a cybersecurity incident, but it will not likely cover all such losses, and the losses that it does not cover may be significant. In any such event, our business could be subject to significant disruption, which could impact our revenues or cause customers to cease doing business with us, and we could suffer monetary and other losses, including reputational harm, which costs we may not be able to recover from our service providers. Our operations are dependent upon our ability to protect our technology infrastructure against damage from business continuity events that could have a significant disruptive effect on our operations.

Our technologies could infringe the intellectual property rights of others, causingcostly litigation and the loss of significant rights.

Significant litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the semiconductor industry. It is possible that a third party may claim that our technologies infringe their intellectual property rights or misappropriate their trade secrets. For example, in late 2020, Ocean Semiconductor LLP (“Ocean”) filed complaints against a number of semiconductor companies in the United States, including a number of our customers, alleging that the importation of IC devices made overseas on a process that, in some cases, included our software, infringed U.S. patents owned by Ocean. By way of further example, in 2019, one of our Exensio customers notified us that they had been named in a lawsuit alleging, among other things, that their use of Exensio Control Distributed infringed the patent of a third party. Any claim, even if without merit, could be time consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all and could adversely affect our sales opportunities, expenses, and revenues.

 

In addition, we collect, use, store or disclose (collectively, “process”) an increasingly large amount of personal information, including from employees and customers, in connection with the operation of our business. The personal information we process is subject to an increasing number of federal, state, local and foreign laws regarding privacy and data security, as well as contractual commitments. Any failure or perceived failure by us to comply with such obligations may result in governmental enforcement actions, fines, litigation, or public statements against us by consumer advocacy groups or others and could cause our customers to lose trust in us, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation and business. Additionally, changes to applicable privacy or data security laws could impact how we process personal information, and therefore limit the effectiveness of our solutions or our ability to develop or deliver new solutions.products or services. For example, the European Union General Data Protection Regulation, which becomesbecame fully effective on May 25, 2018, imposes more stringent data protection requirements and provides for greatersignificant penalties for noncompliance of up to the greater of €20 million or four percent of worldwide annual revenues. Regulation is also increasingly occurring at the U.S. state level to supplement federal legislative action or inaction, as indicated by the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA), which first became enforceable in 2020.

20

 

Additionally, we must frequently expand our internal information system to meet increasing demand in storage, computing and communication, which may result in increased costs. Our internal information system is expensive to expand and must be highly secure due to the sensitive nature of our customers’ information that we transmit. Building and managing the support necessary for our growth places significant demands on our management and resources. These demands may divert these resources from the continued growth of our business and implementation of our business strategy.

 

Competition in the market for data analytics and related systems and services may intensify in the future, which could impedeour ability to grow or execute our strategy.

We currently face indirect competition from the internal groups at IC companies and direct competition from providers of (i) yield management and/or prediction systems, such as KLA-Tencor, Siemens AG (“Siemens”), Onto Innovation, Inc. (“Onto”), and Synopsys, Inc.; (ii) semiconductor manufacturing software, such as Applied Materials, Inc., BISTel Inc., Invantest, Inc., NI, Inc., Onto, and Siemens; (iii) inline inspection, metrology and electrical test equipment providers, such as Applied Materials and Keysight Technologies, Inc.; and, (iv) connectivity software or integration products/services supporting factory connectivity or control needs of customers, such as PEER Group, Inc., Kontron AIS, GmbH, Yokogawa Electric Corp., and Kornic Automation Co. Ltd. There may be other providers of competitive commercial solutions of which we are not aware and we may compete with the products or offerings of these named companies or additional companies if we expand our offerings through acquisition or development. For example, since our acquisition of Cimetrix Incorporated in late 2020, we now face competition in the connectivity and integration products/services supporting factory equipment connectivity and control. The demand for solutions that address the need for better integration between the silicon design and manufacturing processes may encourage direct competitors to enter into our market. For example, in 2020, two of our competitors were acquired by larger entities, Synopsys, Inc. acquired Qualtera and NI, Inc. acquired Optimal+, which may enable greater investment or marketing of these competitive applications. This competition in our market may intensify in the future, which could lead to increased pricing pressure, negatively impacting our revenues, and slow our ability to grow or execute our strategy. Also, our current and potential customers may choose to develop their own solutions internally, particularly if we are slow in deploying our solutions or improving them to meet market needs. These and other competitors may be able to operate with a lower cost structure than our engineering organization, which would give any such competitor’s products a competitive advantage over our solutions.

Risks Related to Our Operations

Measurement of our variable consideration requires data collection and customers’ use of estimates in some cases and issubject to customers' agreement and is later offset if actual data differ from customers’ estimates, which can result in uncertainty and cause quarterlyresults to fluctuate.

We can only recognize volume- or average selling price- based royalties once we have reached agreement with our customers on their level of yield performance improvements or average selling prices (also called “ASP”) and quarterly agreements are sometimes based on estimates of volume results or ASP each quarter. Measuring the amount of yield improvement is inherently complicated and dependent on our customers’ internal processes and certain non-public information, thus, there may be uncertainty as to some components of measurement or calculation. Also, some variable consideration can be highly susceptible to delays in the customer measurement of key factors such as reporting volumes results and level of yield or ASP. Therefore, we may have to estimate revenue related to contingent variable fees or usage-based or sales-based royalties prior to the receipt of performance reports, such as royalty acknowledgements, or other related information from customers. These estimates are subject to judgment to evaluate whether it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur in future periods, which could result in our recognition of less Integrated Yield Ramp revenue than expected in any particular period and later offset when actual results become available.

We have customers with past due receivable balances and our failure to collect a significant portion of such balances could adversely affect our cash, require us to write-off receivables, or increase expense or our bad debt allowance.

If our customers fail to pay receivable balances when due, our cash will decrease and we may have to incur additional expenses in an attempt to collect it, write-off a portion or all of such receivables, or increase our bad debt allowance. Our accounts receivable balance, net of reserves, was $34.1 million and $40.7 million as of December 31, 2020, and 2019, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable, included in accounts receivable, totaled $7.2 million and $7.4 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable that are not expected to be billed and collected during the succeeding 12-month period are recorded in other non-current assets and totaled $2.0 million and $4.1 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. Two customers accounted for 27% of our gross accounts receivable as of December 31, 2020 and three customers accounted for 53% our gross accounts receivable as of December 31, 2019.  The total accounts receivable reserves was $1.0 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. We generally do not require collateral or other security to support

1721

accounts receivable. Despite the financial ability of these customers to pay for on-going services by PDF under valid contracts, customers may delay payments. Our allowances for potential credit losses, if any, could be insufficient, and we may need to adjust our allowance for doubtful accounts from current estimates or write-off receivables depending on such claims in the future.  If we are forced to pursue legal remedies to collect receivables, our expenses could rise significantly and our business relationship and future business with these customers could suffer. 

We have experienced losses in the past and we may incur losses again in the future.

We have experienced losses in the past, and we may incur losses again in the future if we are not able to adequately control our costs or if total revenues fail to exceed costs. In addition, virtually all of our quarterly operating expenses are fixed, so any shortfall in anticipated quarterly revenues could significantly reduce our operating results below expectations. Our accumulated deficit was $76.2 million as of December 31, 2020. We have in the past and may in the future incur significant expenses in connection with:

funding for research and development;

restructuring costs related to our cost control and management efforts;

expansion of our sales and marketing efforts; and

additional non-cash charges relating to amortization and stock-based compensation.

We face operational and financial risks associated with international operations thatcould negatively impact our revenues.

We derive over half of our revenues from sales outside of the United States and we expect our international business to continue to grow. We have in the past expanded and reorganized, at different times, our operations, including international operations, and may in the future continue such expansion or reorganization by establishing or restructuring international subsidiaries, offices, or contractor relationships in locations, if and when, deemed appropriate by our management. Thus, the success of our business is subject to risks inherent in doing business internationally, including in particular:  

our potential growth in China is dependent upon continued investments in the semiconductor industry by both private and public entities within China. Should circumstances change such that the level of investments is substantially reduced, our future growth potential may be limited;

some of our key engineers and other personnel are foreign nationals and they may not be permitted access to certain technical information under U.S. export laws or by certain of our customers and may have difficulty gaining access to the United States and other countries in which our customers or our offices may be located and it may be difficult for us to recruit and retain qualified technical and managerial employees in foreign offices;

ineffective or inadequate protection or enforcement of our intellectual property in foreign jurisdictions;

greater difficulty in collecting account receivables resulting in longer collection periods, bad debt, and increased cost to collect;

language and other cultural differences may inhibit our sales and marketing efforts and create internal communication problems among our U.S. and foreign teams, increasing the difficulty of managing multiple, remote locations and negatively impacting sales and revenue;

compliance with, inconsistencies among, and unexpected changes in, a wide variety of foreign laws and regulatory environments with which we are not familiar, including, among other issues, with respect to employees, personal data, tax, protection of our IP, and a wide variety of operational regulations and trade and export controls under domestic, foreign, and international law;

currency risk due to the fact that certain of our payables and for our international offices are denominated in the foreign currency, including the Euro, Yen, and RMB, while virtually all of our revenues is denominated in U.S. dollars, or in the event a larger portion of our revenues becomes denominated in foreign currencies, we would be subject to a potentially significant exchange rate risk;

22

inadequate local infrastructure that could result in business disruptions;

additional taxes, interest, and potential penalties, and uncertainty around changes in tax laws of various countries;

geopolitical instability or changes in government could disrupt our operations or our customers’ purchases or operations or those of related supply chain participants;

quarantine, private travel limitation, or business disruption in regions affecting our operations, stemming from actual, imminent or perceived outbreak of human pandemic or contagious disease, including the COVID-19; or

economic or political instability, including but not limited to armed conflict, terrorism, interference with information or communication of networks or systems, as well as strained or worsening relations between the United States and China, and the resulting disruption to economic activity and business operations.

Further, our employees and contractors include professionals located in various international locations, including Shanghai, China, and Ramallah, Palestine, who provide software-related development, quality assurance, maintenance, and other technical support services for certain of our software products. Political changes, including policies regarding export control, that affect these or other international operations could disrupt or limit the work our employees and contractors are able to perform, and thus negatively affect the range of services we are able to provide our customers or our cost for such services.

The COVID-19 pandemic has affected the manufacturing and shipment of goods. From January to April 2020, our Shanghai office was temporarily shut down and the restrictions limited the ability of our local employees to travel to customer sites or visit our other offices.  An extended closure of our customers' plants due to a resurgence of COVID-19 or variants thereof in China could adversely impact our business.

In addition, our global operations are subject to numerous U.S. and foreign laws and regulations, including those related to anti-corruption, tax, corporate governance, imports and exports, financial and other disclosures, privacy, and labor relations. These laws and regulations are complex and may have differing or conflicting legal standards, making compliance difficult and costly. In addition, there is uncertainty regarding how proposed, contemplated, or future changes to these complex laws and regulations could affect our business. We may incur substantial expense in complying with the new obligations to be imposed by these laws and regulations, and we may be required to make significant changes in our business operations, all of which may adversely affect our revenues and our business overall. Given the high level of complexity of these laws, there is a risk that some provisions may be inadvertently or intentionally breached, for example through fraudulent or negligent behavior of individual employees, our failure to comply with certain formal documentation requirements or otherwise. If we violate these laws and regulations, we could be subject to fines, penalties, or criminal sanctions, and may be prohibited from conducting business in one or more countries. Additionally, we may be held liable for actions taken by our local dealers and partners. A significant violation could additionally have a significantly negatively impact our sales opportunities, operations, and financial results. Even if our operations and ability to deliver products and services to customers in China and elsewhere are not significantly negatively impacted by such changing regulations, our customers in China and elsewhere may decide to use only local vendors as a precaution. In such case, our expected international business may be slower than expected or not materialize at all, in which case, our sales opportunities, operations, and financial results would suffer.

Further, early decisions by the Biden U.S. Presidential Administration confirm continuity of a bipartisan consensus in the U.S. government favoring increased confrontation of China in trade practices and economic matters, national security, and human rights.  The Biden Administration views technology as a domain of strategic competition in which the U.S. and allies must stay ahead of China and has reaffirmed the U.S. government consensus identifying semiconductor, artificial intelligence, and 5G technologies, and protection of U.S. supply chains as priority efforts.  If the Administration continues to augment ongoing U.S. efforts by enlisting the cooperation of allied countries in both advanced development and protection against P.R.C. use of U.S. and allied advances, or expands or intensifies export controls and sanctions, including by adding more P.R.C. companies to the U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) Entity List, our ability to sell to these companies could be negatively impacted.  Our standard operations include development, distribution processes, software download sites, and professional service centers and processes located in various geographies around the world.  Some customers have expressed concerns to us that continued action by the U.S. government could potentially interrupt their ability to make use of our products or services.  The continuing tension between the U.S. and P.R.C. governments in trade and security matters or the perception of that tension could lead to disruptions or reductions in international trade, deter or prevent purchasing activity of customers, and negatively impact us in our China sales and financial results.

 

Tax Risks

Changes in effective tax rates could positively affect our earnings, thereby raising investors’ expectations, while the final tax rates that are determined could be significantly higher, thereby lowering our earnings and causing us to miss investors’ expectations, which could cause our stock price to drop.

We conduct our business globally and, as a result, are subject to taxation in the United States and foreign countries. Our future tax rates could be affected by numerous factors, including recent changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws, insufficient taxable income to realize deferred tax assets, and changes in accounting policies. Our filings are subject to reviews or audit by the Internal Revenue Service and state, local and foreign taxing authorities. We cannot be sure that any final determination in an audit would not be materially different than the treatment reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. If additional taxes are assessed as a result of an audit, there could be a significant negative effect on our income tax provision and our operating results in the period or periods for which that determination is made. Any changes in our geographical earnings mix in various tax jurisdictions, including those resulting from transfer pricing adjustments, could materially increase our effective tax rate.

Future events may impact our deferred tax asset position, including the utilization of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards.

Realization of our deferred tax assets is dependent primarily upon future taxable income in the applicable jurisdiction. As of December 31, 2020, we recorded a full valuation allowance against all of our U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets due to the uncertainty surrounding the future realization of these deferred tax assets. Therefore, no benefit has been recognized for the net operating loss carryforwards, tax credit carryforwards, and other deferred tax assets. The net operating loss and tax credits could expire unused and be unavailable to reduce future income tax liabilities. We intend to continue maintaining a full valuation allowance on these deferred tax assets until there is sufficient evidence to support the reversal of all or some portion of these allowances. We evaluate our deferred tax assets for realizability each reporting period. The impact of releasing some or all of such valuation allowance in a future period could be a material benefit in the period in which such release occurs.

Risks Related to Our Strategic Transactions

We may not realize the benefits of our strategic partnership with Advantest, which could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations

On July 29, 2020, we entered into a strategic partnership with Advantest Corporation through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantest America, Inc. (collectively, “Advantest”), that includes: (i) a significant agreement for our assistance in development of cloud-based applications for Advantest tools that leverage our Exensio software analytics platform; (ii) a commercial agreement providing for the license to third parties of solutions that result from the development work that combine Advantest’s testing applications and our Exensio platform; (iii) a 5-year cloud-based subscription for our Exensio analytics platform and related services; and (iv) the purchase of 3,306,924 shares of our common stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $65.2 million. This strategic partnership is in the early stages of development, and the full extent of its future impact on our financial condition and results of operations is currently unknown and the failure to reap the anticipated benefits of Advantest’s financial resources, technology, customer relationships, and global footprint and/or develop successful joint solutions could have an adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

Our acquisitions and divestitures create special risks and challenges that could adversely affect our financial results.

We have made, and may continue to make, acquisitions in order to enhance our business. For example, we recently acquired Cimetrix Incorporated (“Cimetrix”) in December 2020 for $35.0 million in cash consideration, net of cash on Cimetrix’s balance sheet as of closing, and subject to other closing adjustments. Acquisitions involve numerous risks, including, but not limited to, problems combining the purchased operations, technologies or products, unanticipated costs, liabilities, litigation, and diversion of management’s attention from our core businesses, adverse effects on existing business relationships with suppliers and customers, risks associated with entering markets in which we have no or limited prior experience, and where competitors in such markets have stronger market positions, initial dependence on unfamiliar supply chains or relatively small supply partners, failure of our due diligence processes to identify significant problems, liabilities or other challenges of an acquired company or technology, and the potential loss of key employees, customers, distributors, vendors, and other business partners of the companies we acquire.

24

There can be no assurance that we will be able to successfully integrate any businesses, products, technologies, or personnel that we might acquire or that the transaction will advance our business strategy. The integration of businesses that we may acquire is likely to be a complex, time-consuming, and expensive process and we may not realize the anticipated revenues or other benefits associated with our acquisitions. If we fail to successfully manage, operate, or integrate any acquired business or if we are unable to efficiently operate as a combined organization, including through the use of common information and communication systems, operating procedures, financial controls, and human resources practices, we could be required to write-down investments and our business, financial condition, and results of operations may be adversely affected. We may also be unable to protect or enforce the intellectual property rights of any target business that we acquire, or such target businesses may become subject to claims of intellectual property infringement. Further, if we become subject to liabilities as a result of an acquisition, the liabilities we incur may be substantial and the amounts of such liabilities may not be covered by and/or may exceed any liability protections.

In connection with certain acquisitions, we may agree to issue common stock, or assume equity awards, that dilute the ownership of our current stockholders, use a substantial portion of our cash resources, assume liabilities (both known and unknown), record goodwill and amortizable intangible assets that will be subject to impairment testing on a regular basis and potential periodic impairment charges, incur amortization expenses related to certain intangible assets, and incur large and immediate write-offs and restructuring and other related expenses, all of which could harm our financial condition and results of operations.

COVID-19 Risks

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected how we and our customers are operating our business and the duration and extent to which this will impact our future results of operations and overall financial performance remains uncertain.
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly a ffected how we and our customers are operating our business. For example, most U.S. states and countries worldwide have imposed and may continue to impose from time-to-time for the foreseeable future, restrictions on the physical movement of our employees, partners, and customers to limit the spread of COVID-19, including travel restrictions and shelter-in-place orders. As a result, our Shanghai office was temporarily shut down and the restrictions limited the ability of our local employees to travel to customer sites or visit our other offices from January to April 2020. Our US R&D facility and offices in Canada, France, Japan and Korea were temporarily closed on various periods during the first to third quarter of 2020, and our corporate headquarters in the United States and several other impacted locations are temporarily closed as well. In addition, our personnel worldwide are subject to various country to country travel restrictions, which limit our ability to provide services to customers at their facilities. These impacts have disrupted our normal operations. If the COVID-19 pandemic has a substantial impact on our employees’ productivity, our results of operations and overall financial performance may be harmed.

Moreover, the conditions caused by the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our customers’ ability or willingness to purchase our products or services, delay prospective customers’ purchasing decisions, adversely impact our ability to provide or deliver products and on-site services to our customers, delay the provisioning of our offerings, lengthen payment terms, reduce the value or duration of their subscriptions, or affect attrition rates, all of which could adversely affect our future sales, operating results and overall financial performance.  For example, we believe the lack of an ability to meet face-to-face during most of 2020 may have made it harder for us to sell complex or new technologies to such customers during 2020.

While the potential economic impact brought by the COVID-19 pandemic may be difficult to assess or predict, the pandemic has resulted in significant disruption of global financial markets and on June 8, 2020, the National Bureau of Economic Research announced that the U.S. was in a recession. A long-term recession or long-term market downturn resulting from the spread of COVID-19 could materially impact the value of our common stock, impact our access to capital and affect our business in the near and long-term.

The duration and extent of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic depends on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time, such as the severity and transmission rate of the virus and variants thereof, the extent and effectiveness of containment actions, including the availability and effective distribution of vaccines, and the impact of these and other factors on our employees, customers, partners and vendors. If we are not able to respond to and manage the impact of such events effectively, or if the macroeconomic conditions of the general economy continue to worsen or the industries in which we operate are negatively impacted over the long-term, our business, operating results, financial condition and cash flows could be adversely affected.

25

General Risk Factors

If we are not able to retain, attract, motivate, and strategically locate talented employees, including some key executives, our business may suffer.

 

Our success and competitiveness depend on our ability to retain, attract, motivate, and strategically locate in our offices around the globe, talented employees, including some of our key executives. Achieving this objective may be difficult due to many factors, including fluctuations in global economic and industry conditions, changes in our management or leadership, the hiring practices at our competitors or customers, cost reduction activities, and the effectiveness of our compensation programs, including equity-based programs. Further, we have had, and expect to continue to have, difficulty in obtaining visas permitting entry for some of our employees that are foreign nationals into the United States, and delays in obtaining visas permitting entry into other key countries, for several of our key personnel, which disrupts our ability to strategically locate our personnel. In recent years, the United State hasStates increased the level of Securityscrutiny in granting H-1(b), L-1 and other business visas. The Trump administration has indicated thatCompliance with United States immigration reform is a priority.and labor laws could require us to incur additional unexpected labor costs and expenses or could restrain our ability to retain skilled professionals.  If we lose the services of certain of our key executives or a significant number of our engineers, it could disrupt our ability to implement our business strategy. If we do not successfully attract, retain, and motivate key employees, including key executives, we may be unable to realize our business objectives and our operating results may suffer.

 

Our stock price has been volatile in the past, and our earnings per share and other operating results may vary quarter to quarter, which could result in not meeting investors’ expectations and cause our stock price todrop.drop.

 

Our stock price has fluctuated widely during the last few years, from a low closing price of $7.73 per share in October 2018 to a high closing price of $24.16$26.18 per share in December 2016.August 2020. A factor in the volatility may be that our historical quarterly operating results have fluctuated. Our future quarterly operating results will likely fluctuate from time to time and may not meet the expectations of securities analysts and investors in some future period, which could cause our stock price to decrease again. A significant reduction in our stock price negatively impacts our ability to raise equity capital in the public markets and increases the cost to us, as measured by dilution to our existing shareholders, of equity financing. In addition, the reduced stock price also increases the cost to us, in terms of dilution, of using our equity for employee compensation or for acquisitions of other businesses. A greatly reduced stock price could also have other negative results, including the potential loss of confidence by employees, the loss of institutional investor interest, a hostile take-over bid, and fewer business development opportunities. Also, significant volatility in the stock price could be followed by a securities class action lawsuit, which could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.

 

Competition in the market for yield improvement solutions and increased integrationbetween IC design and manufacturing may intensify in the future, which could impedeour ability to grow or execute our strategy.

Competition in our market may intensify in the future, which could slow our ability to grow or execute our strategy and could lead to increased pricing pressure, negatively impacting our revenues. Our current and potential customers may choose to develop their own solutions internally, particularly if we are slow in deploying our solutions or improving them to meet market needs. These and other competitors may be able to operate with a lower cost structure than our engineering organization, which would give any such competitor’s products a competitive advantage over our solutions. We currently face indirect competition from the internal groups at IC companies and some direct competition from providers of (i) yield management and/or prediction systems, such as KLA-Tencor, Siemens AG (“Siemens”), Rudolph Technologies, Inc. (“Rudolph”), Synopsys, Inc., and Qualtera, (ii) semiconductor manufacturing software, such as Applied Materials, Inc., BISTel Inc., Invantest, Inc., Optimal+, Rudolph, and Siemens and, (iii) inline inspection, metrology and electrical test equipment providers, such as Applied Materials and Keysight Technologies, Inc. Further, we may compete with the products or offerings of these named companies or additional companies if we expand our offerings through acquisition or development. There may be other providers of commercial solutions for systematic IC yield and performance enhancement of which we are not aware. Further, some providers of yield management software or inspection equipment may seek to broaden their product offerings and compete with us. In addition, we believe that the demand for solutions that address the need for better integration between the silicon design and manufacturing processes may encourage direct competitors to enter into our market. For example, large integrated organizations, such as IDMs, electronic design automation software providers, IC design service companies or semiconductor equipment vendors, may expand their product offerings or decide to spin-off a business unit to compete with us. Other potential competitors include fabrication facilities that may decide to offer solutions competitive with ours as part of their value proposition to their customers. If these potential competitors change the pricing environment or are able to attract industry partners or customers faster than we can, we may not be able to grow and execute our strategy as quickly or at all.

18

Table of Contents

Measurement of our Gainshare performance incentives and other variable consideration requires data collection and customers’ use of estimates in some cases, and issubject to customer agreement and later offset if actual data differ from customers’ estimates, which can result in uncertainty and cause quarterlyresults to fluctuate.

We can only recognize revenue based on Gainshare performance incentives once we have reached agreement with our customers on their level of yield performance improvements and quarterly agreements are sometimes based on estimates of volume results each quarter. Measuring the amount of yield improvement is inherently complicated and dependent on our customers’ internal processes, thus, there may be uncertainty as to some components of measurement. Also, some variable considerations can be highly susceptible to delays in the customer measurement of key factors such as reporting volumes results and level of yield. Therefore, we may have to estimate revenue related to contingent variable fees or usage-based or sales-based royalties prior to the receipt of performance reports, such as Gainshare acknowledgements, or other related information from customers. These estimates are subject judgment to evaluate whether it is probable that a significant revenue reversal will not occur in future periods, which could result in our recognition of less revenue than expected in any particular period and later offset when actual results become available.

Changes in the structure of our customer contracts, including the mix between fixedand variable revenue and the inclusion of acceptance criteria can adversely affect the amount andtiming of our total revenues.

Our long-term success is largely dependent upon our ability to structure our future customer contracts in line with market condition. In addition, if we are unsuccessful in selling our software on a time-basis or the mix shifts toward more Gainshare, we may increase the variability or timing of recognition of our revenue, and therefore increase the risk that our total future revenues will be lower than expected and fluctuate significantly from period to period. Further, if we agree to contractual acceptance criteria in contracts and fail to meet them, the total revenues we receive under a contract could be delayed or decline. 

We have experienced losses in the past and we may incur losses again in the future.

We have experienced losses in the past and we may incur losses again in the future if we are not able to adequately control our costs or if total revenues fail to meet expectations. In addition, virtually all of our quarterly operating expenses are fixed, so any shortfall in anticipated quarterly revenue could significantly reduce our operating results below expectations. Our accumulated deficit was $30.5 million as of December 31, 2018. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses in connection with:

funding for research and development;

expansion of our solution implementation teams;

restructuring costs related to our cost control and management efforts;

expansion of our sales and marketing efforts; and

additional non-cash charges relating to amortization and stock-based compensation.

Our technologies could infringe the intellectual property rights of others, causingcostly litigation and the loss of significant rights.

Significant litigation regarding intellectual property rights exists in the semiconductor industry. It is possible that a third party may claim that our technologies infringe their intellectual property rights or misappropriate their trade secrets. Any claim, even if without merit, could be time consuming to defend, result in costly litigation, or require us to enter into royalty or licensing agreements, which may not be available to us on acceptable terms, or at all. A successful claim of infringement against us in connection with the use of our technologies could adversely affect our business.

19

Table of Contents

Changes in effective tax rates could positively affect our earnings, thereby raising investors’ expectations, while the final tax rates that are determined could be significantly higher, thereby lowering our earnings and causing us to miss investors’ expectations, which could cause our stock price to drop, and we may not be able to use tax credits before their expiration if we fail to have sufficient future income.

We conduct our business globally and, as a result, are subject to taxation in the United States and foreign countries. Our future tax rates could be affected by numerous factors, including recent changes in tax laws or the interpretation of such tax laws and changes in accounting policies. Our filings are subject to reviews or audit by the Internal Revenue Service and state, local and foreign taxing authorities. We cannot be sure that any final determination in an audit would not be materially different than the treatment reflected in our historical income tax provisions and accruals. If additional taxes are assessed as a result of an audit, there could be a significant negative effect on our income tax provision and our operating results in the period or periods for which that determination is made. Any changes in our geographical earnings mix in various tax jurisdictions, including those resulting from transfer pricing adjustments, could materially increase our effective tax rate. Furthermore, we maintain deferred tax assets related to federal, foreign and certain state tax credits. Our ability to use these credits prior to their expiration is dependent upon having sufficient future income.

Uncertainties in the interpretation and application of the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate.

The 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Act) was enacted on December 22, 2017, and significantly changes how the U.S. imposes income tax on multinational corporations. The U.S. Department of Treasury has broad authority to issue regulations and interpretative guidance that may significantly impact how we will apply the law and affect our results of operations in the period issued. The Tax Act requires complex computations not previously provided in U.S. tax law. As such, the application of accounting guidance for such items is currently uncertain. Further, compliance with the Tax Act and the accounting for such provisions require accumulation of information not previously required or regularly produced. As a result, we have provided a provisional estimate on the effect of the Tax Act in our financial statements. Accounting for certain of these provisions requires the exercise of significant judgment. As additional regulatory guidance is issued by the applicable taxing authorities, accounting treatment is clarified, we perform additional analysis on the application of the law, and we refine estimates in calculating the impact, our final analysis, which will be recorded in the period completed, may be different from our current provisional amounts, which could materially affect our tax obligations and effective tax rate.

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist shareholders, and such activism could impact the trading value of our securities.

 

In recent years, shareholder activists have become involved in numerous public companies, including PDF Solutions.our company. Shareholder activists frequently propose to involve themselves in the governance, strategic direction, and operations of the Company.a company. Such proposals may disrupt our business, increase our expenses, and divert the attention of our Board of Directors and our management and employees, and any perceived uncertainties as to our future direction resulting from such a situation could result in the loss of potential business opportunities, interfere with our ability to execute our strategic plan be exploited by our competitors, cause concern to our current or potential customers, and make it more difficult to attract and retain qualified personnel and business partners, all of which could adversely affect our business. A proxy contest for the election of directors at our annual meeting could also require us to incur significant legal fees and proxy solicitation expenses. In addition, actions of activist shareholders may cause significant fluctuations in our stock price based on temporary or speculative market perceptions or other factors that do not necessarily reflect the underlying fundamentals and prospects of our business.

Our success depends upon our ability to effectively plan and manage our resources and restructure our business through rapidly fluctuating economic and market conditions, and such actions may have an adverse effect on our financial and operating results.

 

Our ability to successfully offer our products and services in a rapidly evolving market requires an effective planning, forecasting, and management process to enable us to effectively scale and adjust our business and business models in response to fluctuating market opportunities and conditions.Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.   

Item 2.  Properties

None.

2026

Table of Contents

 

From time to time, we have increased investment in our business by, for example, increasing headcount, acquiring companies, and increasing our investment in R&D, sales and marketing, and other parts of our business. Conversely, in 2018, we initiated a restructuring plan to reduce expenses and align its operations with evolving business needs. Some of our expenses related to such efforts are fixed costs that cannot be rapidly or easily adjusted in response to fluctuations in our business or numbers of employees. Rapid changes in the size, alignment or organization of our workforce, including sales account coverage, could adversely affect our ability to develop and deliver products and services as planned or impair our ability to realize our current or future business and financial objectives. Our ability to achieve the anticipated cost savings and other benefits from our restructuring initiatives within the expected time frame is subject to many estimates and assumptions, which are subject to significant economic, competitive and other uncertainties, some of which are beyond our control. If these estimates and assumptions are incorrect, if we are unsuccessful at implementing changes, or if other unforeseen events occur, our business and results of operations could be adversely affected.

Global economic conditions could materially adversely impact demand for our products and services.

Our operations and performance depend significantly on worldwide economic conditions. Uncertainty about global economic conditions could result in customers postponing purchases of our products and services in response to tighter credit, unemployment, negative financial news and/or declines in income or asset values and other macroeconomic factors, which could have a material negative effect on demand for our products and services and, accordingly, on our business, results of operations or financial condition. For example, any economic and political uncertainty caused by the United States tariffs imposed on goods from China, among other potential countries, and any corresponding tariffs from China or such other countries in response, may negatively impact demand and/or increase the cost for our products.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

Item 2.  Properties

Our principal executive offices are located in Santa Clara, California, where we lease approximately 20,800 square feet of office space expiring in August 2028.

Additionally, as of December 31, 2018, our facilities include the following:

In Milpitas, California, we lease approximately 17,800 square feet of office and laboratory facilities expiring in January 2023.

In La Jolla, California, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania and Richardson, Texas, we lease an aggregate of approximately 12,700 square feet of office space under various leases that expire at different times through October 2022. 

In Shanghai, China, we lease approximately 18,400 square feet of office space expiring in November 2023.

In France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Korea, and Taiwan, we lease an aggregate of approximately 17,600 square feet of office space under various leases that expire at different times through April 2024.

We believe our existing and planned facilities are adequate to meet our current needs and are being utilized consistently with our past practice. We consistently look for opportunities to minimize costs related to office space through improved efficiencies and intend to make changes to leased facilities in the future as appropriate to reflect changes in worldwide operations and headcount.

Item 3.  Legal Proceedings

 

From time to time, we are subject to various claims and legal proceedingsproceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. We accrue for losses related to litigation when a potential loss is probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with FASBFinancial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) requirements. As of December 31, 2018,2020, we were not party to any material legal proceedings, thus no loss was probable, and no amount was accrued.

On May 6, 2020, the Company initiated an arbitration proceeding with the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center against SMIC New Technology Research & Development (Shanghai) Corporation (“SMIC”) due to SMIC’s failure to pay fees due to PDF under a series of contracts. We seek to recover the unpaid fees, a declaration requiring SMIC to pay fees under the contracts in the future, and costs associated with bringing the arbitration proceeding. The arbitration is on-going.

 

Item 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures

 

None.

 

2127

Table of Contents

 

PART II

 

Item 5.  Market For Registrant’s Common Equity, and Related StockholderMatters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Our common stock trades on the NASDAQNasdaq Global Market under the symbol “PDFS.” As of March 1, 2019,3, 2021, we had approximately 3231 stockholders of record. The number of stockholders of record does not include individuals whose stock is in nominee or “street name” accounts through brokers. 

 

Dividend Policy

 

No cash dividends were declared or paid in 2018, 2017 or 2016.2020 and 2019. We currently intend to retain all available funds to finance future internal growth, and product development, and stock repurchases and, therefore, do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

 

22

Table

Unregistered Sales of Contents

Stock Performance GraphEquity Securities

 

The following graphinformation required to be disclosed by paragraph (a) of Item 5 to Form 10-K has been included in a current report on Form 8-K and, tables compare the cumulative total stockholder return data for our stock since December 31, 2013therefore, is not furnished herein, pursuant to the cumulative return over such period of (i) The NASDAQ Composite Index and (ii) the RDG Technology Composite Index. The graph assumeslast sentence in that $100 was invested on December 31, 2013. The graph and tables further assume that such amount was initially invested in the Common Stock of the Company at a per share price of $25.62 (closing price on December 31, 2013) and that of any dividends were reinvested. This performance graph and the corresponding tables are not “soliciting material,” are not deemed filed with the SEC and are not to be incorporated by reference in any filing by us under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing. The stock price performance on the following graph and tables is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.paragraph.

 

  

12/13

  

12/14

  

12/15

  

12/16

  

12/17

  

12/18

 

PDF Solutions, Inc.

  100.00   58.00   42.31   88.02   61.28   32.90 

NASDAQ Composite Index

  100.00   114.62   122.81   133.19   172.11   165.84 

RDG Technology

  100.00   117.81   122.23   138.28   189.14   190.13 

 

Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

 

On October 25, 2016,May 28, 2020, the Company’s 2018 stock repurchase program (the “2018 Program”) that was originally adopted on May 29, 2018, expired. On June 4, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a new stock repurchase program that was effective immediately(the “2020 Program”) to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans, over the next two years. On May 29, 2018, the Board of Directors terminated that 2016 stock repurchase program, and adopted a new program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions, from time to time, over the next two years. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 437,000 shares for $5.2 million under the 2016 program and noNo shares were repurchased under the 2018 program. As ofProgram or 2020 Program during the year ended December 31, 2018, 1,279,000 shares had been repurchased at an average price of $14.59 per share under the 2016 program, for a total purchase of $18.7 million. Under the 2018 program, as of December 31, 2018, $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock remained available for future repurchases.2020.

 

There were no purchases made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” (as the term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) under the Exchange Act) of our common stock during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018.2020.   

 

 

Item 6.  Selected Financial Data.Data

 

The following selected consolidated financial information has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations and should be read in conjunction with Item 7. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes to those statements included therein and in Part IVII of this Form 10-K.

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2015

  

2014

  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 
 

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

  

(In thousands, except per share amounts)

 
                    

Consolidated Statements of Operations Data:

                    

Revenues:

                    

Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

 $60,081  $74,436  $77,162  $63,839  $52,769 

Gainshare performance incentives

  25,713   27,435   30,299   34,138   47,394 

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Data:

               

Total revenues

  85,794   101,871   107,461   97,977   100,163  $88,046  $85,585  $85,794  $101,871  $107,461 

Cost of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions:

                    

Direct costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

  42,228   47,050   44,074   38,847   37,822 

Amortization of acquired technology

  575   471   374   176    

Impairment of deferred costs

              1,892 

Total cost of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

  42,803   47,521   44,448   39,023   39,714 

Gross profit

  42,991   54,350   63,013   58,954   60,449 

Operating expenses:

                    

Costs and Expenses:

           

Costs of revenues

 36,765  33,474  42,803  47,521  44,448 

Research and development

  27,998   30,078   27,559   19,096   14,064  34,654  32,747  27,998  30,078  27,559 

Selling, general and administrative

  23,934   23,684   22,056   20,421   18,457  32,677  26,299  23,934  23,684  22,056 

Amortization of other acquired intangible assets

  435   398   432   196   31  741  609  435  398  432 

Restructuring charges

  576            57    92  576     

Total operating expenses

  52,943   54,160   50,047   39,713   32,609 

Income (loss) from operations

  (9,952)  190   12,966   19,241   27,840 

Interest and other income (expense), net

  493   (264)  (10)  181   119 
Interest and other expense (income), net  1,269  (276)  (493)  264  10 

Income (loss) before taxes

  (9,459)  (74)  12,956   19,422   27,959  (18,060) (7,360) (9,459) (74) 12,956 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  (1,743)  1,263   3,853   7,015   9,497   22,303   (1,942)  (1,743)  1,263   3,853 

Net income (loss)

 $(7,716) $(1,337) $9,103  $12,407  $18,462  $(40,363) $(5,418) $(7,716) $(1,337) $9,103 

Net income (loss) per share:

                               

Basic

 $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.29  $0.39  $0.60  $(1.17) $(0.17) $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.29 

Diluted

 $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.28  $0.39  $0.58  $(1.17) $(0.17) $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.28 

Weighted average common shares:

                               

Basic

  32,169   32,038   31,373   31,424   30,743   34,458   32,411   32,169   32,038   31,373 

Diluted

  32,169   32,038   32,431   32,164   31,939   34,458   32,411   32,169   32,038   32,431 

  

December 31,

 
  

2020 (1) (2)

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 
  

(In thousands)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:

                    

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

 $145,296  $97,605  $96,089  $101,267  $116,787 

Working capital

  151,175   119,580   137,693   144,263   151,757 

Total assets

  287,580   239,544   225,905   224,176   222,329 

Long-term obligations

  10,869   15,391   6,582   6,171   5,004 

Total stockholders’ equity

  234,506   196,157   199,795   198,368   198,803 

________________________

(1)On July 29, 2020,we entered into a strategic partnership with Advantest, which includes, among others, a Securities Purchase Agreement wherein we issued and sold to Advantest America, Inc., an aggregate of 3,306,924 shares of our common stock, at a purchase price of $19.7085 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $65.2 million, on July 30, 2020.

(2)  

In December 2020, we completed the acquisition of Cimetrix for approximately $35.0 million in cash consideration, net of cash on Cimetrix Incorporated (“Cimetrix”) balance sheet as of closing, for all of the outstanding equity of Cimetrix. As of December 31, 2020, payment made for this acquisition, net of cash acquired, amounted to $28.6 million, with the final amounts to be paid on the 12 month anniversary of closing. For further information about this acquisition, see Note 4 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” (Item 8 of Part II of this Report).

 

 

  

December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2015

  

2014

 
  

(In thousands)

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets Data:

                    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $96,089  $101,267  $116,787  $126,158  $115,464 

Working capital

  137,693   144,263   151,757   148,795   147,032 

Total assets

  225,905   224,176   222,329   191,769   177,438 

Long-term obligations

  6,582   6,171   5,004   3,006   3,227 

Total stockholders’ equity

  199,795   198,368   198,803   174,307   161,823 

 

Item 7.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition andResults of Operations

 

Overview

 

We provide hardware, softwareoffer products and IP productsservices designed to integrated circuit (or IC) vendorsempower engineers and their supply chain that are useddata scientists across the semiconductor ecosystem to create, generateconnect, collect, manage, and collect differentiatedanalyze data about their manufacturing process. This data can then be managed and analyzed by our software tools to optimize and improve the design, equipment, manufacturing, and test operations processes used by these IC vendors to improve the yield and quality of their products. We derive revenues from two sources: Analytics and profitability of the products they develop.Integrated Yield Ramp. Our offerings combine proprietary software, professional services using proven methodologies, electrical measurement hardware tools, and physical IP for IC designs. We packageprimarily monetize our solutions in various ways to meetofferings through license fees, contract revenue for professional services, and increasingly recently, time-based fees for software as a service (or SaaS). In some cases, especially on our customers’ specific business and budgetary needs, each of which provides us with various revenue streams. Wehistorical IYR engagements, we also receive a mix of license and service fees for use of our hardware and software and related installation, integration, training, and maintenance and supportvalue-based royalty that we call Gainshare. Our products, services, and in some cases, a variable, performance-based fee.solutions have been sold to IDMs, fabless semiconductor companies, foundries, OSATs, capital equipment manufacturers, and system houses.

 

 

 Industry Trend

 

The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly affected how we and our customers are operating our businesses. For example, most U.S. states and countries worldwide imposed in 2020, and may continue to impose from time-to-time for the foreseeable future, restrictions on the physical movement of people to limit the spread of COVID-19, including travel restrictions and stay-at-home orders. As a result, from January to April 2020, our Shanghai office was temporarily shut down and our local employees were restricted from traveling to customer sites or visiting our other offices. Several other impacted locations were temporarily closed partially or fully in 2020, with minimal staffing only for essential activities including, for example, supporting essential businesses with our U.S. clean room facility. By the third quarter of 2020, our offices in Canada, France, Korea, and Japan had generally reopened with some restrictions returning temporarily at the end of the year. We are closely monitoring the COVID-19 situation and are currently planning to reopen our corporate headquarters in the United States and other offices with a focus on our employees’ safety. In addition, our personnel worldwide continue to be subject to various country-to-country travel restrictions, which limits the ability of some employees to travel to other offices or customer sites. We believe the lack of an ability to meet face-to-face during most of 2020 may have made it harder for us to sell complex or new technologies to such customers during 2020. If we can again begin to meet with customers face-to-face, we may improve traction with these customers. To date, we have been able to provide uninterrupted access to our products and services due to our globally distributed workforce, many of whom were working remotely prior to the pandemic, and our pre-existing infrastructure, which supports secure access to our internal systems. The total duration and full extent of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic depends on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time, such as the ultimate severity and transmission rate of the virus and variants, the extent and effectiveness of containment actions and vaccinations, and the impact of these and other factors on our employees, customers, partners, and suppliers.

Certain other trends may affect our Analytics revenue specifically. In particular, the confluence of Industry 4.0 (i.e. the fourth industrial revolution, or the automation and data exchange in manufacturing technologies and processes) and cloud computing (i.e. the on-demand availability of computing resources and data storage without direct active management by the user) is driving increased innovation in semiconductor and electronics manufacturing and analytics, as well as in the organization of IT networks and computing at semiconductor and electronics companies across the ecosystem. First, the ubiquity of wireless connectivity and sensor technology enables any manufacturing company to augment its factories and visualize its entire production line. In parallel, the cost per terabyte of data storage has continually decreased year to year. The combination of these two trends means that more data is collected and stored than ever before. Further, semiconductor companies are striving to analyze these very large data sets in real-time to make rapid decisions that measurably improve manufacturing efficiency and quality. In parallel, the traditional practice of on-site data storage, even for highly sensitive data, is changing. The ability to cost-effectively and securely store, analyze, and retrieve massive quantities of data from the cloud versus on-premise enables data to be utilized across a much broader population of users, frequently resulting in greater demands on analytics programs. The combination of these latter two trends means that cloud-based, analytic programs that effectively manage identity management, physical security, and data protection are increasingly in demand for insights and efficiencies across the organizations of these companies. We believe that all these trends will continue for the next few years, and the challenges involved in adopting Industry 4.0 and secure cloud computing will create opportunities for our combination of advanced analytics capabilities, proven and established supporting infrastructure, and professional services to configure our products to meet customers’ specialized needs.

Other trends may continue to affect our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue specifically. The logic foundry market at the leading edge nodes, such as 10nm and 7nm, is undergoingunderwent significant change.change over the past few years. The leading foundry has increasedcontinues to dominate market share as other foundriesfoundries either suspended 7nm development or forecasted astarted later start of mass production.than originally forecast in some cases. This trend will likely continue to negatively impact our future Integrated Yield Ramp business on these nodes. For many foundries, utilization rates for 28nm fabs remain suppressed. We expect most logic foundries to invest in derivatives of older process nodes, such as 28nm and 20nm,14nm, to extract additional value as many of their customers will not move to advanced nodes due to either technological barriers or restrictive economics. Leading foundriesFoundries that are continuing to invest inparticipate at leading edge nodes are expected to continue to invest in new technologies such as memory, packaging, and packaging, multi-patterned and EUV lithography, as well as new innovations in process control and variability management. We expect China’s investment in semiconductors to continue for at least the next few years.continue. In order for these trends to provide opportunities for us to increase our business in process control andleveraging electrical characterization, Chinese semiconductors manufacturers will need to increase their production volumes on advanced technology nodes.  nodes and continue to engage foreign suppliers, subject to compliance with changing U.S. export restrictions. As a result of these market developments, we have chosen to focus our resources and investments in products, services, and solutions for analytics.

 

Generally,There are other business trends that may affect our business opportunities generally. For instance, the demand for consumer electronics, and communications devices, and high-performance computing continues to drive technological innovation in the semiconductor industry as the need for products with greater performance, lower power consumption, reduced costs, and smaller size continues to grow with each new product generation. In addition, advances in computing systems and mobile devices have fueledcontinue to fuel demand for higher capacity memory chips. To meet these demands, IC manufacturers and designers are constantly challenged to improve the overall performance of their ICs by designing and manufacturing ICs with more embedded applications to create greater functionality while lowering power and cost per transistor. As this trend continues, companies will continually be challenged to improve process capabilities to optimally produce ICs with minimal random and systematic yield loss, which is driven by the lack of compatibility between the design and its respective manufacturing process. We believe that these difficulties will continue to create a greater need for our products and services that address yield loss across the IC product life cycle.

 

The interest in Industry 4.0 is another trend that will drive increased innovation in semiconductor and electronics manufacturing. The ability to add cost-effective sensors to monitor every stepEarly decisions by the Biden U.S. Presidential Administration confirm continuity of a manufacturing process and the continual reductionbipartisan consensus in the cost per terabyteU.S. government favoring increased confrontation of data storage is moving companies that manufacture products directly or throughChina in trade practices and economic matters, national security, and human rights.  The Biden Administration views technology as a supply chain to collect as much manufacturingdomain of strategic competition in which the U.S. and test data as possible in order to analyze it and optimize every aspectallies must stay ahead of manufacturing and test operations to lower costs and improve product quality and profitability. Many software companies, both large and small, are developing advanced analytics solutions that employ bothChina.  The Administration has reaffirmed the U.S. government consensus identifying semiconductor, artificial intelligence, and machine learning algorithms5G technologies, and protection of U.S. supply chains, as priority efforts.  It appears that the Administration may now augment ongoing U.S. efforts by enlisting the cooperation of allied countries in both advanced development and protection against P.R.C. use of U.S. and allied advances.  The prior U.S. presidential administration expanded and intensified export controls and sanctions, including addition of many P.R.C. companies to identifythe U.S. Export Administration Regulations (EAR) Entity List. These listings restrict supply to designees of items that are subject to the EAR.  After an internal evaluation, we determined that a large percentage of our software products are not of U.S. origin and optimize these inefficienciesare, thus, not subject to the EAR.  Our standard operations include development, distribution processes, software download sites, and professional service centers and processes located in various geographies around the manufacturing supplyworld to better serve our customers. Some customers have nonetheless expressed concerns to us that continued action by the U.S. government could potentially interrupt their ability to make use of our products or services.  The continuing tension between the U.S. and P.R.C. governments in trade and security matters or the perception of that tension could lead to disruptions or reductions in international trade, deter or prevent purchasing activity of customers, and negatively impact us in our China sales and financial results.

Our Strategic Partnership with Advantest

On July 29, 2020, we entered into a strategic partnership with Advantest Corporation through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantest America, Inc., (collectively, “Advantest”) that includes: (i) a significant agreement for our assistance in development of cloud-based applications for Advantest tools that leverage our Exensio software analytics platform; (ii) a commercial agreement providing for the license to third parties of solutions that result from the development work that combine Advantest’s testing applications and our Exensio platform; (iii) a 5-year cloud-based subscription for our Exensio analytics platform and related services; and (iv) the purchase of 3,306,924 shares of our common stock, for aggregate gross proceeds of $65.2 million. Concurrent with the share purchase, Advantest Corporation also entered into multi-year voting and lock-up agreements.

We entered into this partnership to expand test and measurement solutions throughout the semiconductor value chain. We believe that this trendthe combination of our Exensio platform with Advantest’s advanced testing equipment will continue forprovide Advantest tool users with the next few years,ability to connect, test, measure, and analyze manufacturing data generated by the tools at any point in the semiconductor value chain, helping customers increase yield and reduce testing costs. Further, we believe collaboration with Advantest’s technology, direction connection to its customer relationships, and the challenges involved in finding new insightsbreadth of its global footprint will create opportunities for companies that have a combinationenable us to both accelerate our technology roadmap and customer adoption of advancedour AI-driven data analytics capabilities, domain-specific IP, and professional services.  solutions across the supply chain.

 

Cimetrix Acquisition

On December 1, 2020, we completed the acquisition of Cimetrix for approximately $35.0 million in cash consideration, net of cash on Cimetrix’s balance sheet as of closing, and subject to other closing adjustments, for all of the outstanding equity of Cimetrix. The combination of Cimetrix connectivity products with our Exensio platform, which leverages machine learning, is intended to enable IC, assembly, and equipment manufacturer customers to extract more intelligence from their tools, not just data, to build more reliable chips and systems at lower manufacturing costs. We accounted for this acquisition as a business combination in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. This method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be recognized at their respective estimated fair values as of the Acquisition Date. The excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recorded from this acquisition represents business benefits we anticipates from the acquired workforce and expectation for expanded sales opportunities to foster further business growth. Identifiable definite-lived intangible assets comprised of developed technology, customer relationships, non-competition agreements, trademark and trade names, and in-process research and development (“IP R&D”). For further information about this acquisition, see Note 4 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” (Item 8 of Part II of this Report).

Financial Highlights

 

The following wereare our financial highlights for the year ended December 31, 2018:2020:

 

 

Total revenues were $85.8$88.0 million, which was a decreasean increase of $16.1$2.5 million, or 16%3%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. Design-to-silicon-yield solutions2019. Analytics revenue was $60.1$57.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, which was a decreasean increase of $14.4$7.6 million, or 19%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The decreaseincrease in Design-to-silicon-yield solutionsAnalytics revenue was driven by a $10.2 million increase, primarily relateddue to loweran increase in fees from Exensio licenses, higher hours incurredfor characterization services worked across multiple contracts and customers. Additionally, a major customer suspended the developmentcustomers, and production of its 7nm technology node, which impacted the Company’s Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018. These decreases werefrom Cimetrix, partially offset by increasesa $2.6 million decrease in revenue from DFI systems. Integrated Yield Ramp revenue decreased $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, due primarily to a $1.7 million decrease in revenue from Exensio big datalower hours worked across multiple contracts and DFI solutions driven by strong business activitycustomers and $3.3 million less in revenue for the year. Gainshare performance incentivesperiod when compared to the non-recurring revenue from a customer contract amendment, which was $25.7recognized in 2019.

Costs of revenues increased $3.3 million a decrease of $1.7 million, or 6%,for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017. The decrease in Gainshare performance incentives revenue was2019, primarily due to lower incentives revenue from(i) a $2.9 million increase in cloud-delivery related costs and depreciation expense of test equipment,(ii) a $1.4 million increase in personnel-related costs, (iii) a $0.8 million increase in direct costs related to third-party software royalty and licenses expense, equipment and hardware expense, and the 28nm technology nodes,timing of deferral of contract costs, and (iv) a $0.1 million increase in amortization intangible assets related to our acquisition of Cimetrix, all partially offset by higher incentives revenuea $1.8 million decrease in travel expenses resulting from reduced business travel due to the 14nm technology nodes from two of our major customers. Gross margin was 50%, compared to 53% for the year ended December 31, 2017.global COVID-19 pandemic, and a $0.2 million decrease in facilities and other expenses.

   
 

Net loss was $7.7$40.4 million, compared to $1.3$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2017.2019. The increase in net loss was primarily attributable to 16% lower revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018, partially offset by a $5.9(i) $24.2 million decrease in cost of sales and operating expenses that was primarily related to decrease in personnel-related cost driven by lower headcount and a decrease in stock-based compensation expense, and a $3.0 million decreaseincrease in income tax provision due primarily to the impactrecognition of a full valuation allowance against our U.S. net deferred tax assets, (ii) a $3.3 million increase in costs of revenues, (iii) a $8.3 million increase in operating expenses as we continued to make investments in research and development and sales and marketing activities, and due to an increase in general and administrative expenses, primarily due to the recently enacted U.S. Tax Cutsacquisition of Cimetrix, increased subcontractor expenses, and Jobs Act, which provide for, amonglegal fees related to an arbitration proceeding over a disputed customer contract, and (iv) a $1.5 million increase in interest and other things, a decrease in the maximum federal tax rate from 35% to 21% and higher pre-tax operating loss,expense (income), net, all partially offset by lower excess tax benefits related to employee stock compensation.

Net loss per basic and diluted share was $0.24, which was ana $2.5 million increase in net loss of $0.20 per basic and diluted share compared to net loss per basic and diluted share of $0.04 for the year ended December 31, 2017.revenues.

   
 

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments decreased $5.2increased $47.7 million to $96.1$145.3 million at December 31, 2018,2020, from $101.3$97.6 million at December 31, 2017,2019, primarily due to the proceeds from the issuance of our common stock in connection with our strategic partnership with Advantest and cash generated from the operating activities, partially offset by cash used in investing activities, relatedprimarily due to $28.6 million in cash used in the period for the acquisition of Cimetrix and cash used for additions to property and equipment purchased for the development of our DFIDFI™ solution, new office headquarters and expansion of our research and development laboratory and clean room, and cash usedincluding investments in financing activities primarily due to repurchases of our common stock, partially offset by cash generated from operating activities during the year.constructing eProbe tools.

 

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States requires us to make judgments, assumptions, and estimates that affect the amounts reported in the Consolidated Financial Statements and accompanying notes. NoteNotes 1 and 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements describesdescribe the significant accounting policies and methods used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. We consider the accounting policies described below to be our critical accounting policies. These critical accounting policies are impacted significantly by judgments, assumptions, and estimates used in the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements and actual results could differ materially from the amounts reported based on these policies.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

We derive revenuesrevenue from two sources: Design-to-silicon-yield SolutionsAnalytics and Gainshare performance incentives.Integrated Yield Ramp.

 

Design-to-silicon-yield solutionsAnalytics Revenue  — We recognize revenue for each element of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions as follows:

 

We generateAnalytics revenue is derived from the following primary offerings: licenses for software, SaaS, Data Connectivity and Equipment Control Software, DFI™ and CV® systems that do not include performance incentives based on customers’ yield achievement, and services related to the foregoing.

Revenue from standalone software is recognized depending on whether the license is perpetual or time-based. Perpetual (one-time charge) license software is recognized at the time of the inception of the arrangement when control transfers to the customers, if the software license is considered as a significant portionseparate performance obligation from the services offered by us. Revenue from post-contract support is recognized over the contract term on a straight-line basis because we are providing (i) support and (ii) unspecified software updates on a when-and-if available basis over the contract term. Revenue from time-based-licensed software is allocated to each performance obligation and is recognized either at a point in time or over time as follows. The license component is recognized at the time when control transfers to customers, with the post-contract support component recognized ratably over the committed term of our Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenuethe contract. For contracts with any combination of licenses, support, and other services, distinct performance obligations are accounted for separately. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using standalone selling price (or SSP) attributed to each performance obligation.

Revenue from fixed-price solution implementationExensio SaaS arrangements, which allow for the use of a cloud-based software product or service contracts delivered over a specificcontractually determined period of time. time without the customer having to take possession of software, is accounted for as a subscription and is recognized as revenue ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the subscription period beginning on the date the service is first made available to customers. For contracts with any combination of SaaS and related services, distinct performance obligations are accounted for separately. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using SSP attributed to each performance obligation.

Revenue under project–from DFI and CV systems that do not include performance incentives based on customers’ yield achievement is recognized primarily as services are performed. Where there are distinct performance obligations, we allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their SSPs. For these contracts for solution implementation serviceswith multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using SSP attributed to each performance obligation. Where there are not discrete performance obligations, historically, revenue is primarily recognized as services are performed using a percentage of completion method based on costs or labor-hours inputs, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. DueThe estimation of percentage of completion method is complex and subject to many variables that require significant judgement.

Integrated Yield Ramp Revenue

Integrated Yield Ramp revenue is derived from our IYR engagements that include performance incentives based on customers’ yield achievement and Gainshare royalties, typically based on customer’s wafer shipments, pertaining to these fixed-price contracts, which royalties are variable.

Revenue under these project–based contracts, which are delivered over a specific period of time typically for a fixed fee component paid on a set schedule, is recognized as services are performed using a percentage of completion. Similar to the services provided in connection with CV systems that are contributing to Analytics revenue, due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of costs or hours atpercentage of completion method is complex and subject to many variables and requiresthat require significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by us to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs, or the extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs. Losses on fixed-price solution implementation contracts are recognized in the period when they become probable. Revisions in profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions that require the revisions become known and can be estimated (cumulative catch-up method).

 

On occasion, we include our products as a component

 

We also license our DFI system as a separate component of fixed-price service contracts. We allocate revenue to all deliverables based on their standalone selling prices, or SSP. In such instances, we apply judgment to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation.

We license some of our software products separately from solution implementations, primarily our Exensio software platform and related products.  The majority of these products are delivered as on-premise software licenses, while others can be delivered entirely or partially through hosted Software-as-a-Service (or SaaS). Revenue from perpetual (one-time charge) license softwareGainshare royalty contained in yield ramp contracts is recognized at the time of the inception of the arrangement when control transfers to the client, if the software license is distinct from the services offered by us. Revenue from post-contract support subscription is recognized over the contract term on a straight-line basis, because we are providing (i) a service of standing ready to provide support, when-and-if needed, and (ii) unspecified software upgrades on a when-and-if available basis over the contract term. Revenue from time-based license software is allocated to each performance obligation and is recognized either at a point in time or over time. The license component is recognized at the time of the delivery of the software license, with the post-contract support subscription component being recognized ratably over for the committed term of the contract. Revenue from SaaS arrangements that allow for the use of a hosted software product or service over a contractually determined period of time without taking possession of software are accounted for as subscriptions and are recognized as revenue ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the subscription period beginning on the date the service is first made available to customers.

Gainshare performance incentives — Our contracts to provide yield improvement services have historically included two components: (1) a fixed fee for performance by the Company of services delivered over a specific period of time; and (2) a Gainshare performance incentive component where the customer pays a variable fee usuallyrelated to continued usage of our IP after the fixed feefixed-fee service period has ended, related to the usage of the Company's intellectual property.ends, based on a customer’s yield achievement. Revenue derived from Gainshare performance incentives is contingent upon our customers reaching certain defined production yield levels. Gainshare performance incentiveroyalty periods are usuallygenerally subsequent to the delivery of all contractual services and performance obligations. We are required to record Gainshare revenue as a usage-based royalty in accordance with customers' usage of the intellectual property andrevenue in the same period in which the usage occurs. Because we generally do not receive the acknowledgment reports from our customers during a given quarter within the time frame necessary to adequately review the reports and include the actual amounts in quarterly results for such quarter, we accrue the related revenue based on estimates of customers underlying sales achievement. Our estimation process can be based on historical data, trends, seasonality, changes in the contract rate, knowledge of the changes in the industry and changes in customers’ manufacturing environment learned through discussions with customers and sales personnel. As a result of accruing revenue for the quarter based on such estimates, adjustments will be required in the following quarter to true-up revenue to the actual amounts reported.

 

Income Taxes

 

We are required to assess the whether it is more-likely-than“more-likely-than-not” that we will realize our deferred tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income.assets. If we believe that they are not likely to be fully realizable before the expiration dates applicable to such assets, then to the extent we believe that recovery is not likely, we must establish a valuation allowance. Based on all available evidence, both positive and negative, we determined a full valuation allowance was appropriate for our federal and state net deferred tax assets (or DTAs) in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily driven by an increased cumulative loss incurred over the 12-quarter period ended December 31, 2020, near term forecasted book losses, and the likelihood that we will not utilize tax attributes before they begin to expire at the end of 2022. The valuation allowance was approximately $41.9 million and $10.5 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the valuation allowance was primarily related to California R&D tax credits and California net operating losses (or NOLs) related to an acquisition that we currently do not believe to be “more-likely-than-not” to be ultimately realized. We will continue to evaluate the need for a valuation allowance and may change our conclusion in a future period based on changes in facts (e.g., 12-quarter cumulative profit, significant new revenue, etc.). If we conclude that we are more likely than not to utilize some or all of our U.S. DTAs, we will release some or all of our valuation allowance and our tax provision will decrease in the period in which we make such a determination.

We evaluate our DTAs for realizability considering both positive and negative evidence, including our historical financial performance, projections of future taxable income, future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, tax planning strategies, and any carryback availability. In evaluating the need for a valuation allowance, we estimate future taxable income based on management approved business plans. This process involves significant management judgment about assumptions that are subject to change from period to period based on changes in tax laws or variances between future projected operating performance and actual results. Changes in the net deferred tax assets,DTAs, less offsetting valuation allowance, in a period are recorded through the income tax provision and could have a material impact on the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations. The valuation allowance was approximately $9.8 million and $9.1 million as of December 31, 2018, and December 31, 2017, respectively, which was related to California R&D tax credits and California net operating losses related to an acquisition that we currently do not believe to be “more-likely-than-not” to be ultimately realized. If we conclude at a future financial reporting period that there has been a change in our ability to realize our California R&D credit and net operating loss carry forward deferred tax assets, and it is at such time “more-likely-than-not” that we will realize the tax credits before applicable expiration dates, our tax provision will decrease in the period in which we make such determination.Comprehensive Loss.

 

Our income tax calculations are based on application of the respectiveapplicable U.S. federal or state or foreign tax law. Our tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities. Accordingly, we recognize tax liabilities based upon our estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due when such estimates are more-likely-than-not to be sustained. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different than the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases are recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).Comprehensive Loss. At December 31, 2018,2020, no deferred taxes have been provided on undistributed earnings from the Company’sour international subsidiaries. The Company intendsWe intend to reinvest the earnings of itsour non-U.S. subsidiaries in those operations indefinitely. As such, the Company haswe have not provided for any foreign withholding taxes on the earnings of foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018.2020. The earnings of the Company’sour foreign subsidiaries are taxable in the U.S.United States in the year earned under the Global Intangible Low-Taxed Income (“GILTI”) rules implemented under 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (“TCJA”).Act.

 

On March 27, 2020, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) was enacted. The CARES Act includes, among other things, refundable payroll tax credits, deferment of some employer FICA taxes, allowance of net operating loss carrybacks for up to five years, alternative minimum tax credit refunds, and technical amendments regarding the income tax depreciation of qualified improvement property placed in service after December 31, 2017. The removal of certain limitations on the utilization of NOLs resulted in our recognition of an income tax benefit of $1.2 million from the carryback of federal NOLs during the year ended December 31, 2020.

Software Development Costs

 

Internally developed software includesis software developed to meet our internal needs to provide solution implementationcertain services to our end-customers. Thesecustomers. Our capitalized software development costs consist of internal compensation related costs and external direct costs incurred during the application development stage and are amortized over their useful lives, which is generally five to six years. The costs to develop software that is marketed externally have not been capitalized as we believe our current software development process is essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility. As such, all related software development costs are expensed as incurred and included in research and development expense in our consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).Comprehensive Loss. 

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Stock-basedWe account for stock-based compensation is estimated atusing the grant datefair value method, which requires us to measure stock-based compensation based on the award’sgrant-date fair value of the awards and is recognized on a straight-line basisrecognize the compensation expense over the vesting period, which for us is generally four years.requisite service period. As stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

 

We have electedThe fair value of our restricted stock units is equal to usethe market value of our common stock on the date of the grant. These awards are subject to time-based vesting which generally occurs over a period of four years.

The fair value of our stock options is estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, for our stock option grants, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of our common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of our stock options. The expected life of an award is based on historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards granted to employees.options granted. The interest rate assumption is based upon observed Treasury yield curve rates appropriate for the expected life of our stock options.

 

Business Combinations

 

We allocate the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values at the date of the business combination. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require us to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, estimated replacement costs and future expected cash flows from acquired customers, acquired technology, acquired patents, and trade names from a market participant perspective, useful lives and discount rates. The estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. Allocation of purchase consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities affects our amortization expense, as acquired finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the useful life, whereas any indefinite lived intangible assets, including IP R&D and goodwill, are not amortized. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, we record adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings.

Valuation of Long-lived Assets including Goodwill and Intangible Assets

 

We record goodwill when the purchase consideration of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible assets as of the date of acquisition. We have one operating segment and one operating unit. We perform an annual impairment assessment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each calendar year or more frequently, if required to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry demand, that would indicate that it would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, including goodwill. If events or circumstances do not indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered to be impaired and no further testing is required. If further testing is required, we perform a two-step process. The first step involves comparing the fair value of its reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unitamount exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized equal to the second stepamount of excess, limited to the test is performed by comparing the carrying valueamount of the goodwill in the reporting unit to its implied fair value. An impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value. For the purpose of impairment testing, we have determined that we have one reporting unit.total goodwill. There was no impairment of goodwill for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020

 

Our long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, consist of property, and equipment, and intangible assets. We periodically review our long-lived assets for impairment. For assets to be held and used, we initiate our review whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a long-lived asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate.

If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. There was no impairment of long-lived assets including intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018.2020.

 


Leases

 

We have operating leases for our administrative and sales offices, research and development laboratory and clean room. We recognize our long-term operating lease rights and commitments as operating lease right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities, non-current, respectively, on our Consolidated Balance Sheets.  

We determine if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use assets, and operating lease liabilities are initially recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Lease terms include the minimum unconditional term of the lease, and may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain at the commencement date that such options will be exercised. The decision to include these options involves consideration of our overall future business plans and other relevant business economic factors that may affect our business. Since the determination of the lease term requires an application of judgment, lease terms that differ in reality from our initial judgment may potentially have a material impact on our Consolidated Balance Sheet. In addition, our leases do not provide an implicit rate. In determining the present value of our expected lease payments, the discount rate is calculated using our incremental borrowing rate determined based on the information available, which requires additional judgment.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements and Accounting Changes 

 

See our Note 1, “Description of Business and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” included under Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K for a description of recent accounting pronouncements and accounting changes, including the expected dates of adoption and estimated effects, if any, on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

Results of Operations

 

Discussion of Financial Data for the years ended December 31, 2018, 20172020 and 20162019

Revenues, Costs of Revenues, and Gross Margin

 

  

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  % Change  

$ Change

  % Change 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

 

(Dollars in thousands)

                            

Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

 $60,081  $74,436  $77,162  $(14,355)  (19)% $(2,726)  (4)%

Gainshare performance incentives

  25,713   27,435   30,299   (1,722)  (6)%  (2,864)  (9)%

Total

 $85,794  $101,871  $107,461  $(16,077)  (16)% $(5,590)  (5)%

Design-to-silicon-yield solutions as a percentage of total revenues

  70%  73%  72%                

Gainshare performance incentives as a percentage of total revenues

  30%  27%  28%                
  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
  

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(Dollars in thousands)

                

Revenues

                

Analytics

 $57,232  $49,627  $7,605   15%

Integrated Yield Ramp

  30,814   35,958   (5,144)  (14)%

Total revenues

 $88,046  $85,585  $2,461   3%
Costs of revenues  36,765   33,474   3,291   10%
Gross profit $51,281  $52,111  $(830)  (2)%
Gross margin  58%  61%        
                 

Analytics revenue as a percentage of total revenues

  65%  58%        

Integrated Yield Ramp revenue as a percentage of total revenues

  35%  42%        

 

Design-to-silicon-yield solutionsAnalytics Revenue

Analytics revenue is derived from services (including solution implementations, software support and maintenance, consulting, and training) and software and hardware licenses provided during our customer yield improvement engagements as well as during solution product sales.  Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenue decreased $14.4 million and $2.7was $57.2 million for the yearsyear ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively,2020, which was an increase of $7.6 million, compared to the prior year periods,ended December 31, 2019. The increase in Analytics revenue was driven by a $10.2 million increase, primarily due primarily to thean increase in fees from Exensio licenses, higher hours for characterization services worked across multiple contracts and customers, and revenue from Cimetrix, partially offset by a $2.6 million decrease in revenue from our yield ramp solutions resultingDFI systems.

Integrated Yield Ramp Revenue

Integrated Yield Ramp revenue decreased $5.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, due primarily to a $1.7 million decrease in revenue from lower hours worked across multiple contracts and customers. Additionally,customers and $3.3 million less in revenue for the period when compared to the non-recurring revenue from a major customer suspendedcontract amendment, which was recognized in 2019. Our Integrated Yield Ramp revenue may continue to fluctuate from period to period primarily due to the development andcontribution of Gainshare royalty, which is dependent on many factors that are outside our control, including among others, continued production of its 7nm technology node,ICs by our customers at facilities at which impacted the Company’s Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenue in the fourth quarter of 2018. These decreases were partially offsetwe generate Gainshare, sustained yield improvements by increases in revenue from Exensio big dataour customers, and DFI solutions that were driven by strong business activity. our ability to enter into new contracts containing Gainshare.

Our Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenuerevenues may also fluctuate in the future and is dependent on a number ofdue to other factors, including the semiconductor industry’s continued acceptance of our products, services and solutions, the timing of purchases by existing and new customers, cancellations by existing customers, and our ability to attract new customers and penetrate new markets, and further penetration of our current customer base. Fluctuations in future results may also occur if any of our significant customers renegotiate pre-existing contractual commitments, including due to adverse changes in their own business.

 

Gainshare performance incentives revenue represent royalties and performance incentives earned contingent upon our customers reaching certain defined operational levels. Revenue derived from Gainshare performance incentives decreased $1.7 million and $2.9 million for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively, compared to the prior year periods due primarily to lower Gainshare performance incentives revenue from the 28nm technology nodes, partially offset by higher incentives revenue from the 14nm technology nodes. Our Gainshare performance incentives revenue may continue to fluctuate from period to period. Gainshare performance incentives revenue is dependent on many factors that are outside our control, including among others, continued productionCosts of ICs by our customers at facilities at which we generate Gainshare, sustained yield improvements by our customers, and our ability to enter into new solutions contracts containing Gainshare performance incentives.

Cost of Design-to-silicon-yield solutionsRevenues

 

  

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

 

(Dollars in thousands)

                            

Direct costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

 $42,228  $47,050  $44,074  $(4,822)  (10)% $2,976   7%

Amortization of acquired technology

  575   471   374   104   22%  97   26%

Total

 $42,803  $47,521  $44,448  $(4,718)  (10)% $3,073   7%

As a percentage of total revenues

  50%  47%  41%                

CostCosts of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions consistsrevenues consist primarily of costs incurred to provide and support our services, costs recognized in connection with licensing our software, and amortization of acquired technology. Direct costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions consist of services costs and software licenses costs. Services costs consist ofinclude material, employee compensation and related benefits, overhead costs, travel, and allocated facilities-related costs.

Software license costs consist of costs associated with cloud-delivery related expenses and licensing third-party software used by the Companyus in providing services to our customers in solution engagements or sold in conjunction with our software products. Direct

The increase in costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions decreasedrevenues of $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, was primarily due to (i) $3.8$2.9 million increase in cloud-delivery related costs and depreciation expense of test equipment, (ii) a $1.4 million increase in personnel-related costs, (iii) an $0.8 million increase in direct costs related to third-party software royalty and licenses expense, equipment and hardware expense, and the timing of deferral of contract costs, and (iv) a $0.1 million increase in amortization intangible assets related to our acquisition of Cimetrix, partially offset by a $1.8 million decrease in personnel-related cost driven by lower headcount and stock-based compensation expense, a $0.5 million decrease in software licenses coststravel expenses due to the global COVID-19 pandemic, and a $0.2 million decrease in equipment expense. Direct costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions increasedfacilities and other expenses.

Gross Margin

Gross margin for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020 was 58% compared to 61% for the year-ago period, or a decrease of 3%. The higher gross margin during year ended December 31, 2016,2019 was primarily due to $4.5 million in nonrecurring revenue from a $1.5 million increasecustomer contract amendment recognized in personnel-related cost driven by worldwide merit increases and an increase in headcount in Asia, a $1.0 million increase in depreciation expense primarily due to depreciation of test equipment and a $0.4 million increase in equipment expenses.

Amortization of acquired technology increased for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 primarily due to the amortization of acquired technology from acquisition of certain assets from Realtime Performance Europe B.V. (dba “Kinesys Software”) in July 2017.   such period.

 

Operating Expenses:

Research and Development

 

  

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

 

(Dollars in thousands)

                            

Research and Development

 $27,998  $30,078  $27,559  $(2,080)  (7)% $2,519   9%

As a percentage of total revenues

  33%  30%  26%                

  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
  

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(Dollars in thousands)

                

Research and development

 $34,654  $32,747  $1,907   6%

As a percentage of total revenues

  39%  38%        

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs to support product development activities, including compensation and benefits, outside development services, travel, facilities cost allocations, and stock-based compensation charges. Research and development expenses decreased for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a $1.3 million decrease in subcontractor expenses that is primarily related to our DFI and Exensio development projects, and a $1.6 million decrease in personnel-related expense driven by lower headcount and stock-based compensation expense, partially offset by a $0.3 million increase depreciation expense for laboratory equipment, a $0.2 million write-down in carrying value of certain equipment, and a $0.2 million increase in facilities expense.

Research and development expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, primarily due to (i) a $1.4$0.7 million increase in personnel-related expense, (ii) a $0.6 million increase in subcontractor expenses that is primarily related to our DFI systems and Exensio development projects,initiatives, (iii) a $0.7$0.5 million increase in personnel-related cost primarily due to worldwide merit increases,facilities and information technology related-costs, (iv) a $0.4 million increase in depreciationsoftware licenses and maintenance expense, that is relatedand (v) a $0.3 million write-down in carrying value of certain equipment, all partially offset by a $0.6 million decrease in travel expenses due to our DFI equipment. the global COVID-19 pandemic.

We anticipate our expenses in research and development will fluctuate in absolute dollars from period to period as a result of the size and the timing of product development projects and revenue generating activity requirements.projects.

  

Selling, General and Administrative

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

 

$ Change

 

% Change

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 

 

2018

 

2017

 

2016

 

2017 to 2018

 

 

2016 to 20017

 

 

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

            

Selling, general and administrative

 

$

23,934

 

$

23,684

 

$

22,056

 

$

        250

 

 

             1

%

$

     1,628

 

 

             7

%

 $32,677  $26,299  $6,378   24%

As a percentage of total revenues

 

 

28

%

23

%

21

%

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 37% 31%      

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits for sales, marketing and general and administrative personnel, legal and accounting services, marketing communications expenses, travel and facilities cost allocations, and stock-based compensation charges. Selling, general and administrative expenses increased slightly for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017, primarily due to a $0.2 million increase in facilities expense, a $0.2 million increase in legal expense, a $0.1 million increase in consulting and professional fees,  and $0.1 million increase in office relocation expense, partially offset by a $0.2 million decrease in personnel-related cost related to lower stock-based compensation expense and a $0.2 million decrease in bad debt expense.

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased for the year ended December 31, 2017,2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016,2019, primarily due to (i) a $0.4$1.8 million increase in personnel-related cost that is primarily due to worldwide merit increases and hiring of executives,costs, (ii) a $0.4$1.5 million increase in accounting cost related to accounting policy and tax law changes,acquisition-related costs for Cimetrix, (iii) a $0.4$1.5 million increase in facilities expense,subcontractor expenses, (iv) a $0.3$1.3 million increase in fees for legal expenseservices primarily related to an acquisition, andthe arbitration proceeding over a $0.3disputed customer contract, (v) a $0.6 million increase in bad debt expense due to higher levelcloud-services related costs, and (vi) a $0.2 million increase from a write-down of accounts receivable,equipment, all partially offset by a $0.1$0.6 million decrease in depreciation expense. travel expenses.

We anticipate our selling, general and administrative expenses will fluctuate in absolute dollars from period to period as a result of cost control initiatives and to support increased selling efforts in the future.

 

Amortization of Other Acquired Intangible Assetsother acquired intangible assets

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

  

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(Dollars in thousands)

                                        

Amortization of other acquired intangible assets

 $435  $398  $432  $37   9% $(34)  (8)% $741  $609  $132   22%

 

Amortization of other acquired intangible assets consists of the amortization of intangibles acquired as a result of acertain business combination.combinations. The increase in amortization of other acquired intangible assets for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 was primarily due to the amortization of acquired intangible assets from 2017 acquisition.   

Restructuring charges

  

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

 

(Dollars in thousands)

                            

Restructuring charges

 $576  $  $  $576   100% $   %

Restructuring charges for the year ended December 31, 2018, were2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2019, was primarily related to employee separation charges incurred as partamortization of other acquired intangible assets in the Company’s restructuring plan announced on September 27, 2018, to reduce expenses and align its operations with evolving business needs.acquisition of Cimetrix.     

 

See Note 8, Restructuring Charges, in Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 8 of Part II of this Report for more information regarding this restructuring plan.

Interest and Other Income (Expense)Expense (Income), Net

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

  

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(Dollars in thousands)

                                        

Interest and other income (expense), net

 $493  $(264) $(10) $757   (287)% $(254)  2,540%

Interest and other expense (income), net

 $1,269  $(276) $1,545   (560)%

 

Interest and other income (expense)expense (income), net primarily consists of interest income, gains, and losses from foreign currency forward contracts, and foreign currency transaction exchange gain (loss). gains and losses. 

Interest and other income,expense (income), net increased for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, primarily due to net favorable fluctuations in foreign exchange rates and an increasea decrease in interest income due to higherlower interest rates. Interestrates and other expense, net, increased for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due toa higher net unfavorable fluctuations in foreign exchange rates, partially offset by a decrease in loss related to foreign currency forward contracts and an increase in interest income due to higher interest rates. We anticipate interest and other income (expense) will fluctuate in future periods as a result of our projected use of cash and fluctuations of foreign exchange rates.income.

 

Income Tax Provision (Benefit) (Benefit)

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

$ Change

  

% Change

  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

% Change

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 20017

  

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(Dollars in thousands)

                                        

Income tax provision (benefit)

 $(1,743) $1,263  $3,853  $(3,006)  (238)% $(2,590)  (67)% $22,303  $(1,942) $24,245   (1,248)%

Our effective tax rate for 20182020 was 18.4%(123.5%), which was different from the statutory federal tax rate primarily due to recognition of a full valuation allowance against our pre-tax loss, the impact of US tax reform enacted in December 2017, impacts from employee stock compensation, and tax credits. The change in income tax benefit to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018 from income tax provision of $1.3 million from the year ended December 31, 2017, was primarily due to a higher pre-tax operating loss and impact of recently enacted U.S. tax reform, partially offset by lower excess tax benefits related to employee stock compensation.

Our effective tax rate for 2017 was significantly different from the statutory federal tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2017 primarily due to our pre-tax loss and the impact of US tax reform enacted in December 2017. The change in income tax provision to $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 from $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2016 was primarily due to the lower taxable income and tax reform impact. As a result of the legislation enacted, we recognized a tax expense of $3.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 and corresponding $3.2 million decrease in net deferred tax assets asdue to the uncertainty of December 31, 2017. the ultimate realization of the future benefits of such deferred tax assets, partially offset by an income tax benefit from the carryback of federal NOLs pursuant to the provisions of the CARES Act.

 

Any significant change in our future effective tax rates could adversely impact our consolidated financial position, results of operations and cash flows. Our future tax rates may be adversely affected by a number of factors including increase in expenses not deductible for tax purposes, tax legislations in the U.S.United States and in foreign countries where we are subject to tax jurisdictions, the geographic composition of our pre-tax income, the amount of our pre-tax income as business activities fluctuate, our ability to use tax attributes such as research and development tax credits and net operation losses, the tax effects of employee stock activity, audit examinations with adverse outcomes, changes in general accepted accounting principles and the effectiveness of our tax planning strategies.

 

.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

As of December 31, 2018,2020, our working capital, defined as total current assets less total current liabilities, was $137.7$151.2 million, compared to $144.3$119.6 million as of December 31, 2017.2019. Cash, and cash equivalents and short-term investments, on a consolidated basis, were $96.1$145.3 million as of December 31, 2018,2020, compared to $101.3$97.6 million as of December 31, 2017.2019.  As of December 31, 20182020 and 2017,2019, cash and cash equivalents held by our foreign subsidiaries were $4.1$4.0 million and $3.1$3.8 million, respectively. We believe that our existing cash resources and anticipated funds from operations will satisfy our cash requirements to fund our operating activities, capital expenditures, restructuring and other obligations, for at least the next twelve months.

There has been no significant impact to our liquidity and capital resources from the global COVID-19 pandemic. For risk discussion about the continuing impact of global COVID-19 pandemic on our operations or demand for our products, refer to Item 1A, Risk Factors on Part I of this Report.

Private Placement

On July 29, 2020,we entered into a strategic partnership with Advantest, which included the sale to Advantest America, Inc. of 3,306,924 shares of our common stock, at a purchase price of $19.7085 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $65.2 million on July 30, 2020. All of the shares were offered and sold by us pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act 1933, as amended.

Cimetrix Acquisition

As of December 31, 2020, payment made for the Cimetrix acquisition, net of cash acquired, amounted to $28.6 million. The Company held back $3.5 million of the purchase price (the “Holdback Amount”) to satisfy adjustments to the closing balance sheet and claims for indemnity arising out of breaches of certain representations, warranties and covenants, and certain other enumerated items in the merger agreement.  The Holdback Amount, as adjusted, is expected to be paid to the participating equity holders in 2021 on approximately the one-year anniversary of the closing.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data

  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

 
  

2020

  

2019

  2019 to 2020 

(In thousands)

            

Net cash flows provided by (used in):

            

Operating activities

 $21,783  $24,590  $(2,807)

Investing activities

  (150,502)  (13,212)  (137,290)

Financing activities

  64,798   (9,835)  74,633 

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  131   (27)  158 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 $(63,790) $1,516  $(65,306)

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

  

$ Change

  

$ Change

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2017 to 2018

  

2016 to 2017

 

(In thousands)

                    

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Data

                    

Net cash flows provided by (used in):

                    

Operating activities

 $13,338  $10,545  $2,000  $2,793  $8,545 

Investing activities

  (13,116)  (14,096)  (11,282)  980   (2,814)

Financing activities

  (5,202)  (12,224)  30   7,022   (12,254)

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (198)  255   (119)  (453)  374 

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

 $(5,178) $(15,520) $(9,371) $10,342  $(6,149)

Net Cash Flows Provided by Operating Activities

Cash flow from operating activities during 20182020 mostly consisted of net loss, adjusted for certain non-cash items, which primarily consisted of depreciation and amortization, share-based compensation expense and deferred tax assets. Cash generated from operating activities increaseddecreased by $2.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, compared to the year ended December 31, 2017,2019, driven primarily by $13.8 million increase in net change from operating assets and liabilities, which was partially offset by(i) a $6.4$34.9 million increase in net loss, and(ii) a $27.9 million increase in non-cash adjustments to net loss, by $4.6 million primarily due to increase in deferred taxtaxes of $25.5 million and increase in stock-based compensation expense of $1.0 million,  and (iii) a $4.2 million increase in net change in operating assets of $3.7 million. Theand liabilities, the major contributors to the net change in operating assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 20182020, were as follows:

 

Accounts

accounts receivable decreased by $6.8$8.1 million, due primarily to lower billings and higher collections. Days of sales outstanding, or DSO, increased primarily due to slower payments by certain customers in Asia. We have not incurred any significant write-offsincreased collections and lower contractual invoicing activity during the fourth quarter of accounts receivable for fiscal years 2018, 2017 and 2016. 

2020;
  

Other non-current assets decreased by $3.6 million primarily due to billings to customers for unbilled receivables that had reached billing milestones and overall decrease in revenue.

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets increased by $2.1 million primarily due to contract assets resulting from the effect of adopting Accounting Standard Update (ASU) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).

Deferred revenues increased by $2.5 million primarily due to timing of billing and revenue recognition.

Cash flow from operating activities during 2017 mostly consisted of net loss, adjusted for certain non-cash items, which primarily consisted of depreciation and amortization and share-based compensation expense. Cash generated from operating activities increased by $8.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to the year ended December 31, 2016, primarily due to a $17.4 million increase in net change from operating assets and liabilities and a $1.5 million increase in non-cash adjustments to net loss primarily due to a $1.3 million increase in depreciation and amortization, partially offset by a $10.4 million increase in net loss. The major contributors to the net change in operating assets and liabilities for the year ended December 31, 2017 were as follows:

Accounts receivable increased by $9.6 million primarily due to delayed payments from a few customers despite a decrease in revenues. The increase in accounts receivable and DSO was primarily driven by the geographic shift in total revenues to Asia, where slower payments are common due to governmental currency controls and regulations in certain countries. Other non-current assets decreased by $2.1 million, primarily due to thea decrease in long-term unbilledthe noncurrent portion of unbilled receivables due to the solution contracts.

timing of billing and revenue recognition;
  

Other non-current assets decreased

accrued compensation and related benefits increased by $2.1$1.9 million, primarily due to the decreasetiming of payments of accrued bonuses and accrued payroll taxes, and increases in long-term unbilled portionaccrued vacation; and,
billings in excess of recognized revenues and deferred revenues and increased by $8.0 million, primarily due to the solution contracts.

timing of billing and revenue recognition.

 

Net CashFlows Used in Investing Activities

 

CashNet cash used in investing activities decreasedincreased by $1.0$137.3 million from for the year ended December 31, 20182020, compared to year ended December 31, 2017. Cash used in investing activities increased by $2.8 million from for the year ended December 31, 2017 compared to year ended December 31, 2016. For the year ended December 31, 2018, cash flows used in investing activities consisted of $13.1 million payments for capital expenditures which included purchases of test equipment, furniture and fixture and leasehold improvements for the new office headquarters and expansion of research and development laboratory and clean room. For the year ended December 31, 2017, cash flows used in investing activities primarily consisted of $10.2 million payments for capital expenditures, primarily test equipment and $3.8 million cash paid for acquisition of business.2019.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016,2020, cash used in investing activities is consisted of $11.3 million payments for capital expenditures, primarily related to development(i) purchases of $131.5 million short-term investments and property, (ii) a $28.6 million payment for the acquisition of Cimetrix, and (iii) a $7.0 million for equipment purchased and prepayment for our DFI system, including construction of additional eProbe tools, partially offset by $16.5 million proceeds from maturities of short-term investments.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, cash used in investing activities related to (i) $10.6 million of property and equipment purchased primarily related to the construction of our DFI solution.DFI™ assets and expansion of our research and development laboratory and clean room, and (ii) a $2.7 million payment for acquisition of certain assets from StreamMosaic, Inc.

 

Net Cash Flows Used inProvided by (Used in) Financing Activities

 

Net cash used inprovided by financing activities decreasedincreased by $7.0$74.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, compared to year ended December 31, 2017. Net cash used in financing activities increased by $12.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2017, compared to year ended December 31, 2016. 2019. 

For the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, net cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of $65.1 million net proceeds from the issuance of common stock in connection with the Securities Purchase Agreement with Advantest, and $4.2 million of proceeds under our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the exercise of stock options, partially offset by $4.5 million in cash payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, net cash used in financing activities primarily consisted of $5.2$9.6 million in cash used to repurchase shares of our common stock, and $2.1$2.7 million in cash payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards, partially offset by $2.4$2.7 million of proceeds fromunder our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and the exercise of stock options. For the year ended December 31, 2017, net cash used in financing activities primarily consisted of $13.4 million cash used to repurchase shares of our common stock and $3.5 million cash payments for taxes related to net share settlements of equity awards, partially offset by $4.7 million proceeds from our Employee Stock Purchase Plan and exercise of stock options.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2016, net cash provided by financing activities primarily consisted of $3.0 million proceeds from the exercise of stock options and $1.6 million proceeds from our Employee Stock Purchase Plan, partially offset by $4.5 million cash used to repurchase shares of our common stock and cash payments for taxes related to net share settlements of equity awards.

Related Party Transactions

 

the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Item 8 of Part II of this Report) for a discussion on related party transactions between the Company and Advantest.

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We do not have any off-balance sheet arrangements, investments in special purpose entities or undisclosed borrowings or debt.  

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes our known contractual obligations (in thousands) as of December 31, 2018:2020:     

  

 

Payments Due by Period

  

Payments Due by Period

 

Contractual Obligations

 

2019

  

2020

  

2021

  

2022

  

2023

  

2023 and thereafter

  

Total

  

2021

  

2022

  

2023

  

2024

  

2025

  

2026 and thereafter

  

Total

 

Operating lease obligations(1)

 $1,677  $1,811  $1,653  $1,484  $1,127  $3,673  $11,425  $1,967  $1,704  $1,145  $812  $827  $2,154  $8,609 

Purchase obligations(2)

  7,788   532   396   8   5      8,729   10,332   2,034   363   320   321      13,370 

Total(3)

 $9,465  $2,343  $2,049  $1,492  $1,132  $3,673  $20,154  $12,299  $3,738  $1,508  $1,132  $1,148  $2,154  $21,979 

 


______________

(1)

In April 2018, we entered into a new approximately 20,800 square foot lease, located in Santa Clara, California. The term(1)

Refer to Note 7 of the new lease is ten years commencing on September 1, 2018. The total lease obligation over the new lease term is approximately $7.3 million, less a lease abatement allowance“Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” (Item 8 of approximately $0.4 million. The termsPart II of the new lease include a tenant improvement allowance of $1.5 million. Future minimum lease payments under the lease are included in the above table.

this Report) for further discussion.
  

(2)

Purchase obligations consist of agreements to purchase goods and services entered in the ordinary course of business.

  

(3)

(3)

The contractual obligation table above excludes liabilities for uncertain tax positions of $3.0$2.9 million, which are not practicable to assign to any particular years due to the inherent uncertainty of the tax positions.  See Note 912 of “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements” (Item 8 of Part II of this Report) for further discussion.

 

 

Item 7A.   Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

 

The following discusses our exposure to market risk related to changes in interest rates and foreign currency exchange rates. We do not currently own any equity investments, nor do we expect to own any in the foreseeable future. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. Actual results could vary materially as a result of a number of factors.

 

Interest Rate Risk.   As of December 31, 2018,2020, we had cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments of $96.1$145.3 million. Cash and cash equivalents consisted of cash and highly liquid money market instruments.instruments and short-term investments consisted of U.S. Treasury bills. We would not expect our operating results or cash flows to be affected to any significant degree by the effect of a sudden change in market interest on our portfolio. A hypothetical increase in market interest rates of 100 basis points from the market rates in effect at December 31, 2018,2020, would cause the fair value of these investments to decrease by an immaterial amount which would not have significantly impacted our financial position or results of operations.

 

At December 31, 2020 and periodically throughout the year, we have maintained cash balances in various operating accounts in excess of federally insured limits. We limit the amount of credit exposure with any one financial institution by evaluating the creditworthiness of the financial institutions with which we invest and investing through more than one financial institution.

Foreign Currency and Exchange Risk. Certain of our receivables and payables for our international offices are denominated in the local currency, including the Euro, Yen and RMB. Therefore, a portion of our revenues and operating expenditures isare subject to foreign currency risks. WeFrom time to time, we enter into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. We do not use foreign currency forward contracts for speculative or trading purposes. We record these forward contracts at fair value. The counterparty to these foreign currency forward contracts is a large global financial institution that we believe is creditworthy, and therefore, we believe the credit risk of counterparty non-performance is not significant. The change in fair value of these contracts is recorded into earnings as a component of other income (expense), net and offsets the change in fair value of foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, which is also recorded in other income (expense), net. As of December 31, 2018, the notional amount of this2020, we had no outstanding forward contract was $8.2 million. A foreign currency exchange rate movement of plus-or-minus 10% will result in the change in fair value of this contract of plus-or-minus $0.8 million.contracts.

 

 

Item 8.   Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders  

PDF Solutions, Inc.

 

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetsheets of PDF Solutions, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the yeartwo years in the period ended December 31, 2018,2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year thentwo years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and our report dated March 7, 2019,11, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion.

Change in Accounting Principle

As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company adopted Accounting Standard Codification Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, effective January 1, 2018.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audit.audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our auditaudits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our auditaudits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our auditaudits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audit providesaudits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Critical Audit Matter

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relates to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing a separate opinion on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

Revenue Recognition

As described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company derives revenue from Analytics and Integrated Yield Ramp Revenue.  Contracts with customers can include various combinations of licenses, products and services, some of which are distinct and are accounted for as separate performance obligations.  Significant judgment is exercised by the Company in determining revenue recognition for customer agreements, including determining whether licenses and services are distinct performance obligations, determining the standalone selling price (or SSP) attributed to each performance obligation, establishing the pattern of delivery for each distinct performance obligation, and estimating variable consideration when determining the amount of revenue to recognize.  In addition, for revenue under project-based contracts for fixed-price services, revenue is recognized as services are performed using a percentage-of-completion (or POC) method based on costs or labor-hours input method.  Estimated costs to complete each contract are based on i) future labor and product costs and ii) expected productivity efficiencies.  Changes in these estimates can have a material effect on revenue recognized and/or related cost.  Finally, the Company recognized Gainshare royalty revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs.  The Company accrues the related revenue based on estimates of customers’ underlying sales achievements.  These estimates are based on historical data, trends, seasonality, changes in contract rate, knowledge of changes in the industry and changes in the customer’s manufacturing environment learned through discussions with customers and sales personnel.

The principal audit considerations for our determination that performing procedures related to the Company’s revenue recognition for customer agreements is a critical audit matter are the significant amount of judgment required by management in this process.  Significant judgment is required in determining SSP as the Company rarely licenses software on a standalone basis, so the Company is required to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation, which in turn led to significant auditor judgment, subjectivity and effort in performing audit procedures in assessing the allocation of SSPs to performance obligations.  In addition, significant judgment is required in determining the total estimated contract costs for fixed-price contracts, which in turn led to significant auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in performing audit procedures and in evaluating audit evidence relating the total estimated contract costs.  Significant judgment is also required in recording Gainshare royalty revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs.  The Company generally does not receive the acknowledgment reports from customers during a given quarter, so the Company is required to accrue the related revenue based on estimates of customers underlying sales achievement, which in turn led to significant auditor judgment, subjectivity, and effort in evaluating the reasonableness of these estimates based on historical data, trends, seasonality and other factors.

Addressing the matter involved performing procedures and evaluating audit evidence in connection with forming our overall opinion on the consolidated financial statements. These procedures included testing the effectiveness of internal controls relating to the revenue recognition process, including internal controls related to (1) the identification of distinct performance obligations and data used to establish SSP for products and services, (2) project estimates to completion for fixed fee arrangements accounted for under POC and (3) estimates of Gainshare royalty revenue accrual and subsequent true-ups.  These procedures also included, among others, evaluating management’s significant accounting policies related to these customer agreements for reasonableness.  In addition, for a sample of customer agreements, we obtained and read contract source documents, including master agreements and other documents that were part of the agreement, tested management’s identification of significant terms for completeness, including the identification of distinct performance obligations and variable consideration, assessed the terms in the customer agreements and evaluated the appropriateness of management’s application of their accounting policies, along with their use of estimates, in the determination of revenue recognition conclusions, and tested the mathematical accuracy of management’s calculations of revenue and the associated timing of revenue recognized in the financial statements.  In addition, we evaluated the reasonableness of management’s estimates of SSP for projects and services that are not sold separately, where applicable, costs to complete for project-based contracts for fixed-price services and customers’ underlying achievements for royalty revenue.

 

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2018.

 

/s/ BPM LLP

San Jose, CA

March 7, 201911, 2021

 

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

 

 

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders  

PDF Solutions, Inc.

 

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of PDF Solutions, Inc. (a Delaware corporation) and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (2013 framework) (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheetsheets as of December 31, 20182020 and 2019 and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss),loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the year thentwo years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”) of the Company, and our report dated March 7, 201911, 2021 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Assessment of Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

 

/s/ BPM LLP

San Jose, California

March 7, 2019

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of PDF Solutions, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the consolidated balance sheet of PDF Solutions, Inc. and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss), stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017, including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended December 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.   

Basis for Opinion

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. 

We conducted our audits of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

San Jose, California

March 16, 2018

We served as the Company's auditor from 2009 to 201811, 2021

 

 

 

 

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par values)

 

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2020

  

2019

 
 

 

  

ASSETS

ASSETS

 

ASSETS

 

Current assets:

             

Cash and cash equivalents

 $96,089  $101,267  $30,315  $97,605 

Accounts receivable, net of allowances of $332 and $374, respectively

  51,570   57,564 

Short-term investments

 114,981  0 

Accounts receivable, net of reserves of $963 in 2020 and $213 in 2019

 34,140  40,651 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  9,562   5,069   13,944   9,320 

Total current assets

  157,221   163,900  193,380  147,576 

Property and equipment, net

  35,681   25,386  39,242  40,798 
Operating lease right-of-use assets, net 6,672 7,609 

Goodwill

  1,923   1,923  15,774  2,293 

Intangible assets, net

  5,064   6,074  24,573  6,221 

Deferred tax assets

  19,044   16,348  249  25,327 

Other non-current assets

  6,972   10,545   7,690   9,720 

Total assets

 $225,905  $224,176  $287,580  $239,544 
 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

Current liabilities:

             

Accounts payable

 $2,454  $2,536  $4,399  $7,636 

Accrued compensation and related benefits

  4,727   6,493  8,339  5,072 

Accrued and other current liabilities

  3,235   2,627  6,309  1,665 

Deferred revenues - current portion

  8,477   7,981 
Operating lease liabilities – current portion 1,926 1,867 

Deferred revenues – current portion

 19,895  10,639 

Billings in excess of recognized revenues

  635      1,337  1,117 

Total current liabilities

  19,528   19,637  42,205  27,996 

Long-term income taxes payable

  3,751   3,902  2,956  5,368 
Non-current operating lease liabilities 6,516 7,677 

Other non-current liabilities

  2,831   2,269   1,397   2,346 

Total liabilities

  26,110   25,808   53,074   43,387 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)

        

Commitments and contingencies (Note 8)

       

Stockholders’ equity:

             

Preferred stock, $0.00015 par value, 5,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

      

Common stock, $0.00015 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; shares issued 40,677 and 39,799, respectively; shares outstanding 32,382 and 32,112, respectively

  5   5 

Additional paid-in capital

  310,660   297,950 

Treasury stock, at cost, 8,295 and 7,688 shares, respectively

  (79,142)  (71,793

)

Preferred stock, $0.00015 par value, 5,000 shares authorized, no shares issued and outstanding

 $0  $0 

Common stock, $0.00015 par value, 70,000 shares authorized; shares issued 46,400 and 41,797, respectively; shares outstanding 36,850 and 32,503, respectively

 6  5 

Additional paid-in-capital

 407,173  325,197 

Treasury stock at cost, 9,550 and 9,294 shares, respectively

 (96,215) (91,695)

Accumulated deficit

  (30,452)  (27,089

)

 (76,233) (35,870)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (1,276)  (705

)

  (225)  (1,480)

Total stockholders’ equity

  199,795   198,368   234,506   196,157 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

 $225,905  $224,176  $287,580  $239,544 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)LOSS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Revenues:

            

Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

 $60,081  $74,436  $77,162 

Gainshare performance incentives

  25,713   27,435   30,299 

Total revenues

  85,794   101,871   107,461 
             

Costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions:

            

Direct costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

  42,228   47,050   44,074 

Amortization of acquired technology

  575   471   374 

Total cost of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

  42,803   47,521   44,448 

Gross profit

  42,991   54,350   63,013 
             

Operating expenses:

            

Research and development

  27,998   30,078   27,559 

Selling, general and administrative

  23,934   23,684   22,056 

Amortization of other acquired intangible assets

  435   398   432 

Restructuring charges

  576       

Total operating expenses

  52,943   54,160   50,047 
             

Income (loss) from operations

  (9,952)  190   12,966 

Interest and other income (expense), net

  493   (264)  (10)

Income (loss) before income taxes

  (9,459)  (74)  12,956 

Income tax provision (benefit)

  (1,743)  1,263   3,853 

Net income (loss)

 $(7,716) $(1,337) $9,103 
             

Net income (loss) per share:

            

Basic

 $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.29 

Diluted

 $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.28 
             

Weighted average common shares:

            

Basic

  32,169   32,038   31,373 

Diluted

  32,169   32,038   32,431 
             

Net income (loss)

 $(7,716) $(1,337) $9,103 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

  (571)  1,286   (448)

Comprehensive income (loss)

 $(8,287) $(51) $8,655 
  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Revenues:

        

Analytics

 $57,232  $49,627 

Integrated Yield Ramp

  30,814   35,958 

Total revenues

  88,046   85,585 
         

Costs and Expenses:

        

Costs of revenues

  36,765   33,474 

Research and development

  34,654   32,747 

Selling, general and administrative

  32,677   26,299 

Amortization of other acquired intangible assets

  741   609 

Restructuring charges

  0   92 

Interest and other expense (income), net

  1,269   (276)

Loss before income taxes

  (18,060)  (7,360)

Income tax provision (benefit)

  22,303   (1,942)

Net loss

 $(40,363) $(5,418)
         

Other comprehensive income (loss):

        

Foreign currency translation adjustments, net of tax

 $1,253  $(204)
Change in unrealized losses related to available-for-sale debt securities, net of tax  2   0 
Total other comprehensive income (loss) $1,255  $(204)

Comprehensive loss

 $(39,108) $(5,622)
         

Net loss per share:

        

Basic

 $(1.17) $(0.17)

Diluted

 $(1.17) $(0.17)
         

Weighted average common shares:

        

Basic

  34,458   32,411 

Diluted

  34,458   32,411 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

(in thousands)thousands)

  

         

Additional

              

Accumulated

Other

                        Accumulated    
 

Common Stock

  Paid-In  

Treasury Stock

  

Accumulated

  Comprehensive            

Additional

          

Other

 

Total

 
 

Shares

  

Amount

  Capital  

Shares

  

Amount

  Deficit  (Loss)  

Total

  

Common Stock

 

Paid-In

 

Treasury Stock

 

Accumulated

 

Comprehensive

 

Stockholders’

 

Balances, January 1, 2016

  31,111  $5  $266,008   6,365  $(50,383) $(39,780) $(1,543) $174,307 
 

Shares

  

Amount

  

Capital

  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Deficit

  

Loss

  

Equity

 

Balances, January 1, 2019

 32,382  $5  $310,660  8,295  $(79,142) $(30,452) $(1,276) $199,795 

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock purchase plan

 172  0  1,534  0  0  0  0  1,534 

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of options

 230  0  1,289  0  0  0  0  1,289 

Vesting of restricted stock units

 504  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

Purchases of treasury stock in connection with tax withholdings on restricted stock grants and exercise of options

 0  0  0  214  (2,786) 0  0  (2,786)

Repurchases of common stock

 (785) 0  0  785  (9,767) 0  0  (9,767)

Stock-based compensation expense

 -  0  11,714  -  0  0  0  11,714 

Comprehensive loss

  -   0   0   -   0   (5,418)  (204)  (5,622)

Balances, December 31, 2019

 32,503   5   325,197  9,294   (91,695)  (35,870)  (1,480)  196,157 

Issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs of $0.1 million

 3,307  1  65,077  0  0  0  0  65,078 

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock purchase plan

  173   -   1,557   -   -   -   -   1,557  183  0  1,670  0  0  0  0  1,670 

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of options

  393   -   2,972   -   -   -   -   2,972  246 0 2,570 0 0 0 0 2,570 

Vesting of restricted stock units

  336   -   -   -   -   -   -   -  611  0  0  0  0  0  0  0 

Purchases of treasury stock in connection with tax withholdings on restricted stock grants

  -   -   -   136   (2,317)  -   -   (2,317) 0  0  0  256  (4,520) 0  0  (4,520)

Repurchases of common stock

  (149)  -   -   149   (2,182)  -   -   (2,182)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   10,886   -   -   -   -   10,886  -  0  12,659  -  0  0  0  12,659 

Tax benefit from employee stock plans

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Comprehensive income

  -   -   -   -   -   9,103   (448)  8,655 

Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2016-09

  -   -   -   -   -   4,925   -   4,925 

Balances, December 31, 2016

  31,864  $5  $281,423   6,650  $(54,882) $(25,752) $(1,991) $198,803 

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock purchase plan

  200   -   1,864   -   -   -   -   1,864 

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of options

  440   -   2,823   -   -   -   -   2,823 

Vesting of restricted stock units

  450   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases of treasury stock in connection with tax withholdings on restricted stock grants

  -   -   -   196   (3,493)  -   -   (3,493)

Repurchases of common stock

  (842)  -   -   842   (13,418)  -   -   (13,418)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   11,840   -   -   -   -   11,840 

Tax benefit from employee stock plans

  -   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Comprehensive income

  -   -   -   -   -   (1,337)  1,286   (51)

Balances, December 31, 2017

  32,112  $5  $297,950   7,688  $(71,793) $(27,089) $(705) $198,368 

Cumulative-effect adjustment from adoption of ASU 2014-09

  -   -   -   -   -   4,353   -   4,353 

Issuance of common stock in connection with employee stock purchase plan

  201   -   1,831   -   -   -   -   1,831 

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of options

  81   -   560   -   -   -   -   560 

Vesting of restricted stock units

  425   -   -   -   -   -   -   - 

Purchases of treasury stock in connection with tax withholdings on restricted stock grants

  -   -   -   170   (2,101)  -   -   (2,101)

Repurchases of common stock

  (437)  -   -   437   (5,248)  -   -   (5,248)

Stock-based compensation expense

  -   -   10,319   -   -   -   -   10,319 

Comprehensive loss

  -   -   -   -   -   (7,716)  (571)  (8,287)

Balances, December 31, 2018

  32,382  $5  $310,660   8,295  $(79,142) $(30,452) $(1,276) $199,795 

Comprehensive income (loss)

  -   0   0   -   0   (40,363)  1,255   (39,108)

Balances, December 31, 2020

  36,850  $6  $407,173   9,550  $(96,215) $(76,233) $(225) $234,506 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)thousands)

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2020

  

2019

 

Cash flows from operating activities:

                

Net income (loss)

 $(7,716) $(1,337) $9,103 

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

Net loss

 $(40,363) $(5,418)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

 

Depreciation and amortization

  4,967   4,789   3,584  6,725  6,029 

Stock-based compensation expense

  10,295   11,810   11,002  12,463  11,423 

Amortization of acquired intangible assets

  1,010   869   805  1,446  1,183 

Amortization of costs capitalized to obtain revenue contracts

 549  448 

Adjustment to contingent consideration related to acquisition

 0  36 

Loss on disposal and write-down in carrying value of property and equipment

 500  130 

Accretion of discount on short-term investments

 (25) 0 

Deferred taxes

  (4,171)  (504)  216  21,007  (4,532)

Provision for (reversal of) allowance for doubtful accounts

  (42)  174   (99)

Unrealized loss (gain) on foreign currency forward contract

  67   (27)  (47)

Loss on disposal and write-down in value of property and equipment

  230   6   107 

Adjustment to contingent consideration related to acquisition

  114       

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

             

Accounts receivable

  6,828   (9,581)  (14,620)

Accounts receivable, net of reserves

 8,101  10,919 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  (2,115)  373   (1,688) (433) (810)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

 1,193  1,394 

Other non-current assets

  3,560   2,103   (10,988) 2,069  758 

Accounts payable

  (1,406)  1,963   85  (918) 807 

Accrued compensation and related benefits

  (1,609)  249   1,178  1,926  261 

Accrued and other liabilities

  240   72   (231) 928  (597)

Deferred revenues

  2,451   (326)  4,772  7,755  3,410 

Billings in excess of recognized revenues

  635   (88)  (1,179) 220  482 

Operating lease liabilities

  (1,360)  (1,333)

Net cash provided by operating activities

  13,338   10,545   2,000   21,783   24,590 
             

Cash flows from investing activities:

                

Purchases of short-term investments

 (131,454) 0 

Proceeds from maturities of short-term investments

 16,500  0 

Purchases of property and equipment

  (13,116)  (10,255)  (11,282) (6,005) (10,552)

Payments of business acquisitions, net of cash acquired

     (3,841)   

Prepayment for the purchase of property and equipment

 (963) 0 

Payment for business acquisition, net of cash acquired

  (28,580)  (2,660)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (13,116)  (14,096)  (11,282)  (150,502)  (13,212)
             

Cash flows from financing activities:

                

Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition

  (244)      

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs paid

 65,078  0 

Proceeds from exercise of stock options

  560   2,822   2,972  2,570  1,161 

Repurchases of common stock

  (5,248)  (13,418)  (2,182)

Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan

  1,831   1,865   1,557  1,670  1,534 

Payments for taxes related to net share settlement of equity awards

  (2,101)  (3,493)  (2,317) (4,520) (2,685)

Repurchases of common stock

 0  (9,639)

Payment of contingent consideration related to acquisition

  0   (206)

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

  (5,202)  (12,224)  30   64,798   (9,835)
             

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

  (198)  255   (119)  131   (27)

Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents

  (5,178)  (15,520)  (9,371)

Net change in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

 (63,790) 1,516 

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year

  101,267   116,787   126,158   97,605   96,089 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of year

 $96,089  $101,267  $116,787 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

            

Cash paid during the period for:

            

Taxes

 $2,582  $2,244  $3,635 

Property and equipment received and accrued in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities

 $2,101  $1,235  $666 

Tenant allowance paid by landlord for leasehold improvements

 $1,536  $  $ 

Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash, end of year

 $33,815  $97,605 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 


PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS CONTINUED

(in thousands)

  Year Ended December 31, 
  

2020

  

2019

 
Reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year        
Cash and cash equivalents $30,315  $97,605 
Restricted cash included in prepaid expenses and other current assets  3,500   0 
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year $33,815  $97,605 
         

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

        

Cash paid during the period for taxes

 $2,707  $2,693 

Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities

 $2,022  $1,775 
         

Supplemental disclosure of noncash information:

        

Stock-based compensation capitalized as software development costs

 $190  $309 

Property and equipment received and accrued in accounts payable and accrued and other liabilities

 $133  $1,107 

Advances for purchase of fixed assets transferred from prepaid assets to property and equipment

 $0  $1,416 

Operating lease liabilities arising from obtaining right-of-use assets

 $286  $333 

Common shares repurchased from a cashless exercise of stock options

 $0  $128 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

1.DESCRIPTION  DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Description of Business

 

PDF Solutions, Inc. (the “Company” or “PDF”), provides differentiated dataproducts and analytics solutionsservices designed to the semiconductor and electronics industries. The Company offers an end-to-end analytics platform that empowersempower engineers and data scientists across the semiconductor ecosystem to rapidlyconnect, collect, manage, and analyze data about design, equipment, manufacturing, and test to improve the yield quality, and profitabilityquality of their products.products and operational efficiency. The Company’s products, services, and solutions include proprietary software, physical intellectual property (or IP) for integrated circuit (or IC) designs, electrical measurement hardware tools, proven methodologies, and professional services.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries after the elimination of all significant intercompany balances and transactions.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“U.S. GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Significant estimates in these financial statements include revenue recognition, the estimated useful lives of property and equipment and intangible assets, assumptions made in analysis of allowance for doubtful accounts, fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business combinations, impairment of goodwill and long-lived assets, valuation for deferred tax assets, and accounting for lease obligations, stock-based compensation expense, and accounting for income taxes.tax uncertainties and contingencies. Actual results could differ from those estimates.estimates and may result in material effects on the Company’s operating results and financial position.

 

The global COVID-19 pandemic has impacted the operations and purchasing decisions of companies worldwide. It also has created and may continue to create significant uncertainty in the global economy. The Company has undertaken measures to protect its employees, partners, customers, and vendors. In addition, the Company’s personnel worldwide are subject to various travel restrictions, which limit the ability of the Company to provide services to customers and affiliates. This impacts the Company’s normal operations. The Company believes the lack of an ability to meet face-to-face in most of 2020may have made it harder for us to sell complex or new technologies to new customers during 2020. If the Company can again begin to meet with customers face-to-face, the Company may improve traction with such new customers. To date, the Company has been able to provide uninterrupted access to its products and services due to its globally distributed workforce, many of whom are working remotely, and its pre-existing infrastructure that supports secure access to the Company’s internal systems. If, however, the COVID-19 pandemic has a substantial impact on the productivity of the Company’s employees or its partners’ or customers’ decision to use the Company’s products and services, the results of the Company’s operations and overall financial performance may be adversely impacted. The duration and extent of the impact from the COVID-19 pandemic depends on future developments that cannot be accurately predicted at this time. As of the date of issuance of the financial statements, the Company is not aware of any specific event or circumstance that would require updates to the Company’s estimates and judgments or revisions to the carrying value of its assets or liabilities. These estimates may change, as new events occur and additional information is obtained, and are recognized in the consolidated financial statements as soon as they become known. Actual results could differ from those estimates and any such differences may be material to the financial statements.

Concentration of Credit Risk 

 

Financial instruments that potentially expose the Company to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, short -term investments, and accounts receivable. The Company maintains its cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments with what it considers high credit quality financial institutions.

 

The Company primarily sells its technologiesproducts and services to companies in Asia, Europe and North America within the semiconductor industry. As of December 31, 2018, 2020, two customers accounted for 56%27% of the Company’s gross accounts receivable and one customer accounted for 37%23% of the Company’s revenues for 2018.2020. As of December 31, 2017, two2019, three customers accounted for 56%53% of the Company’s gross accounts receivable and one customer accounted for 40%31% of the Company’s revenues for 2017.2019. See Note 1114 for further details. The Company does not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. To reduce credit risk, management performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. The Company maintains allowances for potential credit losses.  

The allowance for doubtful accounts, which was based on management’s best estimates, could be adjusted in the near term from current estimates depending on actual experience. Such adjustments could be material to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents, and Short-term Investments, and Restricted Cash

 

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of 90 days or less or investments with a remaining maturity of 90 days or less at the purchase to be cash equivalents. Investmentsequivalents and investments with original maturities greater than three months and90 days but less than one year are classifiedto be short-term investments. The Company classifies securities with readily determinable market values as short-term investments.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at costavailable-for-sale. Short-term investments include available-for-sale securities and are depreciated usingcarried at estimated fair value, with the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives (in years)unrealized gains and losses deemed temporary in nature, net of the related assettax, reported as follows:

Computer equipment

  3  

Software

  3  

Furniture, fixtures, equipment and test equipment

 3-10 

Leasehold improvements

 

Shorter of estimated useful life or term of lease

 

Long-lived Assets

The Company’s long-lived assets, excluding goodwill, consist of propertyaccumulated other comprehensive loss in stockholders’ equity. Realized gains and equipmentlosses and intangible assets. The Company periodically reviews its long-lived assets for impairment. For assetsdeclines in value determined to be heldother than temporary are based on the specific identification method and used, the Company initiates its review whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amountare included as a component of a long-lived asset group may not be recoverable. Recoverability of an asset group is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recordedother expense, net in the amount by which the carrying amountConsolidated Statements of the asset group exceeds its fair value.  

GoodwillComprehensive Loss.

 

The Company records goodwill whenperiodically reviews short-term investments for impairment. In the purchase consideration of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible assets as of the date of acquisition. The Company performs an annual impairment assessment of its goodwill during the fourth quarter of each calendar year or more frequently if required to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate orevent a decline in value is determined to be other-than-temporary, an impairment loss is recognized. When determining if a decline in value is other-than-temporary, the overall industry demand, that would indicateCompany takes into consideration the current market conditions, the duration and severity of and the reason for the decline, and the likelihood that it would more likely than not reduceneed to sell the security prior to a recovery of par value.

As of December 31, 2020, short-term investments consisted solely of U.S. Treasury bills. The cost of these securities approximated fair value and there was 0 material gross realized or unrealized gains or losses as of a reporting unit below its carryingDecember 31, 2020. There were also 0 impairments in the investments’ value in the year ended December 31, 2020. As of December 31, 2019, the Company held 0 short-term investments. Refer to Note 15 “Fair Value Measurements” for further discussion on the Company’s investments.

Restricted cash of $3.5 million included in the “Prepaid expenses and other current assets” in the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2020 pertains to the amount, including goodwill. If events or circumstances do not indicate thatsubject to adjustments, specifically designated to pay for the fair valueholdback amount related to the Company’s acquisition of a reporting unitCimetrix Incorporated (“Cimetrix”)  and is below its carrying amount, goodwill is not consideredexpected to be impaired and nosettled in 2021. Refer to Note 4, “Business Combination” for further testing is required. If further testing is required, the Company performs a two-step process. The first step involves comparing the fair value of its reporting unit to its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying value of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, the second step of the test is performed by comparing the carrying value of the goodwill in the reporting unit to its implied fair value. An impairment charge is recognized for the excess of the carrying value of goodwill over its implied fair value. For the purpose of impairment testing, the Company has determined that it has one reporting unit. There has been no impairment of goodwill for any periods presented.discussion.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable include amounts that are unbilled at the end of the period that are expected to be billed and collected within 12-month12-month period. Unbilled accounts receivable is determined on an individual contract basis. Unbilled accounts receivable, included in accounts receivable, totaled $22.2$7.2 million and $7.4 million as of December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017.2019, respectively. Unbilled accounts receivable that are not expected to be billed and collected during the succeeding 12-month12-month period are recorded in other non-current assets and totaled $5.3$2.0 million and $8.6$4.1 million as of December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017,2019, respectively. The Company performs ongoing credit evaluations of its customers’ financial condition. An allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained for probable credit losses based upon the Company’s assessment of the expected collectability of the accounts receivable. The allowance for doubtful accounts is reviewed on a quarterly basis to assess the adequacy of the allowance.

 

Allowance for doubtful accountsAccounts receivable reserves are summarized below (in thousands):

 

  

Balance at Beginning of Period

  

Charged to

Expense (1)

  

Charged
Against Revenue (1)

  

Deductions/ Write-offs of Accounts

  

Balance at End of Period

 

2020

 $213  $0  $800  $(50) $963 

2019

 $332  $0  $0  $(119) $213 

________________________

(1)  

Additions to the accounts receivable reserve for doubtful accounts are charged to bad debt expense. Additions to the receivable reserve for billing adjustments are charged against revenue.

  

Balance at

Beginning

of Period

  

Charged to

Costs and

Expenses

  

Deductions/

Write-offs of

Accounts

  

Balance at

End of

Period

 

Allowance for doubtful accounts

                

2018

 $374  $  $42  $332 

2017

 $200  $174  $  $374 

2016

 $299  $  $99  $200 
52

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives (in years) of the related asset as follows:

Computer equipment

3

Software

3

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

3 - 10

Laboratory and test equipment

3 - 10

Leasehold improvements

Shorter of estimated useful life or term of lease

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets consist of acquired technology, certain contract rights, customer relationships, trademarks and trade names, and in-process research and development (IP R&D). These intangible assets may be acquired through business combinations or direct purchases. Intangible assets are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives which range from one to ten years, except for IP R&D projects. Upon completion of the IP R&D asset, it will be amortized over the estimated useful life or will be written off upon abandonment. The Company continually monitors events and changes in circumstances that could indicate carrying amounts of long-lived assets, including property and equipment and intangible assets, may not be recoverable. When such events or changes in circumstances occur, the Company assesses the recoverability of long-lived assets. Recoverability of an asset group is measured by comparison of its carrying amount to the expected future undiscounted cash flows that the asset group is expected to generate. If it is determined that an asset group is not recoverable, an impairment loss is recorded in the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset group exceeds its fair value. 

Goodwill

The Company records goodwill when the purchase consideration of an acquisition exceeds the fair value of the net tangible and identified intangible assets as of the date of acquisition.  The Company has one operating segment and one operating unit. The Company performs a qualitative analysis when testing a reporting unit’s goodwill for impairment. The Company performs an annual impairment assessment of goodwill during the fourth quarter of each calendar year or more frequently, if required to determine if any events or circumstances exist, such as an adverse change in business climate or a decline in the overall industry demand, that would indicate that it would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a reporting unit below its carrying amount, including goodwill. If events or circumstances do not indicate that the fair value of a reporting unit is below its carrying amount, then goodwill is not considered to be impaired and no further testing is required. If the carrying amount exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss would be recognized equal to the amount of excess, limited to the amount of total goodwill. 

Leases

The Company has operating leases for administrative and sales offices, research and development laboratory and clean room. The Company recognizes long-term operating lease rights and commitments as operating lease right-of-use assets (ROU), operating lease liabilities and operating lease liabilities, non-current, respectively, in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.  The Company also elected the transition package of three practical expedients which allow companies not to reassess (i) whether agreements contain leases, (ii) the classification of leases, and (iii) the capitalization of initial direct costs. Further, the Company elected to not separate lease and non-lease components for all of its leases.

The Company determines if an arrangement is, or contains, a lease at inception. Operating lease right-of-use assets, and operating lease liabilities are initially recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Lease terms include the minimum unconditional term of the lease, and may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain at the commencement date that such options will be exercised. The decision to include these options involves consideration of our overall future business plans and other relevant business economic factors that may affect our business. Since the determination of the lease term requires an application of judgment, lease terms that differ in reality from our initial judgment may potentially have a material impact on the Company’s Consolidated Balance Sheets. In addition, the Company’s leases do not provide an implicit rate. In determining the present value of the Company’s expected lease payments, the discount rate is calculated using the Company’s incremental borrowing rate determined based on the information available, which requires additional judgment.

Software Development Costs

 

Internally developed software includesis software developed to meet our internal needs to provide solution implementationcertain services to our end-customers. Thesethe customers. The Company’s capitalized software development costs consist of internal compensation related costs and external direct costs incurred during the application development stage and are amortized over their useful lives, generally five to six years. The costs to develop software that is marketed externally have not been capitalized as we believe our current software development process is essentially completed concurrent with the establishment of technological feasibility. As such, all related software development costs are expensed as incurred and included in research and development expense in our consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).Comprehensive Loss.

 

Revenues

 

Costs of revenues consist primarily of costs incurred to provide and support our services, costs recognized in connection with licensing our software, and amortization of acquired technology. Services costs include material, employee compensation and related benefits, overhead costs, travel, and allocated facilities-related costs. Software license costs consist of costs associated with cloud-delivery related expenses and licensing third-party software used by us in providing services to the Company’s customers in solution engagements or sold in conjunction with the Company’s software products.

Research and Development Expenses

 

Research and development expenses consist primarily of personnel-related costs to support product development activities, including compensation and benefits, outside development services, travel, facilities cost allocations, and stock-based compensation charges. Research and development expenses are charged to operations as incurred. 

 

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of compensation and benefits for sales, marketing and general and administrative personnel, legal and accounting services, marketing communications, travel and facilities cost allocations, and stock-based compensation charges.

Stock-Based Compensation

 

Stock-basedThe Company accounts for stock-based compensation using the fair value method, which requires the Company to measure stock-based compensation based on the grant-date fair value of the awards and recognize the compensation expense over the requisite service period. As stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant date basedand revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

The fair value of the Company’s restricted stock units (“RSUs”) is equal to the market value of the Company’s common stock on the award’sdate of the grant. These awards are subject to time-based vesting which generally occurs over a period of four years.

The fair value andof the Company’s stock options is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, generally four years. The Company has elected to useestimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life and interest rates. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company’s stock options. The expected life of an award is based on historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards granted to employees.options granted. The interest rate assumption is based upon observed Treasury yield curve rates appropriate for the expected life of the Company’s stock options. As stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company'sCompany’s provision for income tax comprises its current tax liability and change in deferred tax assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the expected tax consequences of temporary differences between the tax bases of assets and liabilities. The measurement of current and deferred tax assets and liabilities is based on provisions of enacted tax laws; the effect of future changes in tax laws or rates are not anticipated. Valuation allowances are provided to reduce deferred tax assets to an amount that in management’s judgment is more likely than not to be recoverable against future taxable income. No U.S. taxes are provided on earnings of non-U.S. subsidiaries, to the extent such earnings are deemed to be permanently invested. The Company's income tax calculations are based on application of the respectiveapplicable U.S. federal and state or foreign tax laws. The Company’s tax filings, however, are subject to audit by the respective tax authorities.  Accordingly, the Company recognizes tax liabilities based upon its

estimate of whether, and the extent to which, additional taxes will be due when such estimates are more-likely-than-notmore-likely-than-not to be sustained. An uncertain income tax position will not be recognized if it has less than a 50% likelihood of being sustained. To the extent the final tax liabilities are different from the amounts originally accrued, the increases or decreases are recorded as income tax expense or benefit in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).Comprehensive Loss.

  

Net Income (Loss) Per Share 

 

Basic net income (loss) per share is computed by dividing net income by weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding outstanding stock options and shares subject to repurchase). Diluted net income (loss) per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases in which the effect would be anti-dilutive. Dilutive potential common shares consist of incremental common shares issuable upon exercise of stock options, upon vesting of restricted stock units,RSUs, contingently issuable shares for all periods and assumed issuance of shares under the Company’s employee stock purchase plan. No dilutive potential common shares are included in the computation of any diluted per share amount when a loss from continuing operations was reported by the Company.

Foreign Currency Translation

 

The functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries is the local currency for the respective subsidiary. The assets and liabilities are translated at the period-end exchange rate, and statements of operationscomprehensive loss are translated at the average exchange rate during the year. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency translations are included as a component of other comprehensive income (loss).loss. Gains and losses resulting from foreign currency transactions are included in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements of operations and comprehensive income (loss).Comprehensive Loss.

Derivative Financial Instruments 

 

The Company operates internationally and is exposed to potentially adverse movements in foreign currency exchange rates. TheFrom time to time, the Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities. The Company does not use foreign currency contracts for speculative or trading purposes. The Company records these forward contracts at fair value. The counterparty to these foreign currency forward contracts is a large global financial institution that the Company believes is creditworthy, and therefore, we believe the credit risk of counterparty non-performance is not significant. These foreign currency forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Therefore, the change in fair value of these derivatives is recorded into earnings as a component of interest and other income (expense), net and offsets the change in fair value of the foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, which are also recorded in interest and other income (expense), net. The duration of these forward contracts is usually between two to three months.

 

LitigationBusiness Combinations

The Company allocates the fair value of purchase consideration to the tangible assets acquired, liabilities assumed and intangible assets acquired based on their estimated fair values at the date of the business combination. The excess of the fair value of purchase consideration over the fair values of these identifiable assets and liabilities is recorded as goodwill. Such valuations require management to make significant estimates and assumptions, especially with respect to intangible assets. Significant estimates in valuing certain intangible assets include, but are not limited to, estimated replacement costs and future expected cash flows from acquired customers, acquired technology, acquired patents, and trade names from a market participant perspective, useful lives and discount rates. Management’s estimates of fair value are based upon assumptions believed to be reasonable, but which are inherently uncertain and unpredictable and, as a result, actual results may differ from estimates. Allocation of purchase consideration to identifiable assets and liabilities affects the Company’s amortization expense, as acquired finite-lived intangible assets are amortized over the useful life, whereas any indefinite lived intangible assets, including IP R&D and goodwill, are not amortized. During the measurement period, which is not to exceed one year from the acquisition date, the Company records adjustments to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed, with the corresponding offset to goodwill. Upon the conclusion of the measurement period, any subsequent adjustments are recorded to earnings. 

Litigation 

 

From time to time, the Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for losses related to litigation when a potential loss is probable and the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with Financial Accounting StandardStandards Board ("FASB")(FASB) requirements. As of December 31, 2018, the Company is not a party to any material legal proceedings, thus no loss was probableSee Note 8, Commitments and no amount was accrued.  Contingencies.

 

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which supersedes the revenue recognition requirements in Revenue Recognition (Topic 605). Subsequently, the FASB has issued several amendments to the standard, including clarification on accounting for licenses of intellectual property and identifying performance obligations. Under Topic 606, the new revenue recognition standard provides a five-step analysis of transactions to determine when and how revenue is recognized. The core principle is that a company should recognize revenue to reflect the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The Company adopted this new standard on the first day of the first fiscal quarter of fiscal 2018. The Company chose to adopt the standard using the modified retrospective transition method. See Revenue Recognition, in Note 2 for further information, including further discussion on the impact of adoption and changes in accounting policies relating to revenue recognition.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments. The purpose of this standard is to clarify the treatment of several cash flow categories. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In November 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Restricted Cash, that will require that the amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents would be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The new guidance also requires certain disclosures to supplement the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, Business Combinations: Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which narrows the existing definition of a business and provides a framework for evaluating whether a transaction should be accounted for as an acquisition (or disposal) of assets or a business. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718) Scope of Modification Accounting. This standard clarifies which changes to the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award require an entity to apply modification accounting in Topic 718. The standard is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The Company adopted this standard on January 1, 2018, and it did not have a material impact on its financial statements and footnote disclosures.

In March 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118. The staff of the SEC recognized the complexity of reflecting the impacts of the Tax Cuts and Job Act (“TCJA”), and on December 22, 2017, issued guidance in Staff Accounting Bulletin 118 (SAB 118), which clarifies accounting for income taxes under

Recently Adopted Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 740 if information is not yet available or complete and provides for up to a one-year period in which to complete the required analysis and accounting (the measurement period).  The Company accounted for the tax effects of the TCJA under the guidance of SAB 118, on a provisional basis as of December 31, 2017 and through the first three quarters of 2018. The accounting for TCJA was completed as of December 31, 2018. Refer to Note 9, Income Taxes, for further discussion regarding the impact of this standard to the Company's consolidated financial statements.

 

Recent Accounting Standards or Updates Not Yet Effective Intangibles – Goodwill and Other

 

In February 2016, January 2017, the FASB issued ASU Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The update requires that most leases, including operating leases, be recorded on the balance sheet as an asset and a liability, initially measured at the present value of the lease payments. Subsequently, the lease asset will be amortized generally on a straight-line basis over the lease term, and the lease liability will bear interest expense and be reduced for lease payments. The amendments in this update are effective for public companies’ financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those fiscal years. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11 2017- Leases (Topic 842): Targeted Improvements (ASU No. 2018-11). Prior to ASU No. 2018-11, a modified retrospective transition was required for financing or operating leases existing at or entered into after the beginning of the earliest comparative period presented in the financial statements. ASU No. 2018-11 allows entities an additional transition method to the existing requirements whereby an entity could adopt the provisions of ASU No. 2016-02 by recognizing a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings in the period of adoption without adjustment to the financial statements for periods prior to adoption.  In December 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-20, Leases (Topic 842): Narrow-Scope Improvements for Lessors, which clarified how lessors should apply certain aspects of the new lease standard. The Company intends to adopt this guidance in the first quarter of fiscal 2019 using the new transition method provided by ASU No. 2018-11. The adoption of this standard will result in the recognition of right-of-use assets and lease liabilities from its long-term operating lease obligations, and is expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated balance sheet.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04,04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350)350). This standard eliminates step 2 from the annual goodwill impairment test. This update iswas effective for annual periodsthe Company beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted, and is to be applied on a prospective basis.in the first quarter of 2020. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption ofadopted this standard willon January 1, 2020, and it did not have a significantmaterial impact on its consolidated financial statements or the relatedand footnote disclosures.

 

Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract

In FebruaryAugust 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-02, Income Statement – Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effect from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income. This update allows a reclassification from accumulated other comprehensive income to retained earnings for stranded tax effects resulting from the TCJA enacted in December 2017. This update will be effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 2018-15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of this standard will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-15, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40)350-40): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement That Is a Service Contract. The new guidance clarifies the accounting for implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software in cloud computing arrangements. Further, the standard also requires entities to expense the capitalized implementation costs of a hosting arrangement over the term of the hosting arrangement. This standard iswas effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2020. Early adoption is permitted. ASU No. 2018-152018-15 should be applied either retrospectively or prospectively to all implementation costs incurred after the date of adoption. The Company adopted ASU No.2018-15 on January 1, 2020 on a prospective basis. There was no material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements as a result of adoption of ASU No.2018-15. As of December 31, 2020, the implementation costs capitalized by the Company pertaining to a cloud computing arrangement, which related to sales order and customer relation management, amounted to $0.4 million. The capitalized implementation costs were included in other noncurrent assets on the Consolidated Balance Sheet and within the operating activities section of the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31, 2020.  When the module or component of the hosting arrangement is ready for its intended use, the Company expects to amortize the capitalized implementation costs over the respective noncancellable period of the arrangement plus the period covered by an option to extend the arrangement that is reasonably certain of being exercised. The amortization expense related to these assets for the year ended December 31, 2020 was immaterial.

Management has reviewed other recently issued accounting pronouncements and has determined there are not yet determined any that would have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Accounting Standards Not Yet Effective

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU No.2016-13, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (ASU 2016-13), which requires measurement and recognition of expected credit losses for financial assets held at the reporting date based on internal information, external information, or a combination of both relating to past events, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts. ASU No.2016-13 replaces the existing incurred loss impairment model with a forward-looking expected credit loss model, which will result in earlier recognition of credit losses. Subsequent to the issuance of ASU No.2016-13, the FASB issued ASU No.2018-19, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, ASU No.2019-04, Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses, Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging, and Topic 825, Financial Instrument, ASU No.2019-05, Financial Instruments – Credit Losses (Topic 326) Targeted Transition Relief, ASU No.2016-13, ASU No.2019-10 Financial Instruments-Credit Losses (Topic 326), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815), and Leases (Topic 842), and ASU No.2019-11 Codification Improvements to Topic 326, Financial Instruments-Credit Losses. The subsequent ASUs do not change the core principle of the guidance in ASU No.2016-13. Instead, these amendments are intended to clarify and improve operability of certain topics included within ASU No.2016-13.

Additionally, ASU No.2019-10 defers the effective date for the adoption of the new standard on credit losses for public filers that are considered small reporting companies (“SRC”) as defined by the SEC to fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, including interim periods within those fiscal years, which will be fiscal 2023 for the Company if it continues to be classified as a SRC. In February 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-02, which provides guidance regarding methodologies, documentation, and internal controls related to expected credit losses. The subsequent amendments will have the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU No.2016-13. Early adoption is permitted. Topic 326 requires a modified retrospective approach by recording a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. While the Company is currently evaluating the impact of Topic 326, the Company does not expect the adoption of this standardASU to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

2.  REVENUE RECOGNITIONstatements or the related disclosure.

 

On January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Topic 606, using the modified retrospective transition method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. Under this method, the Company evaluated contracts that were in effect at the beginning of fiscal 2018 as if those contracts had been accounted for under Topic 606 from the beginning of their terms. Upon adoption, the Company recognized the cumulative effect of adopting this guidance as an adjustment to accumulated deficit on the date of initial application. The comparative information in prior periods has not been restated and continues to be reported under the accounting standards in effect for those periods.

  

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No.2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740) related to simplifying the accounting for income taxes. The guidance is effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2021 on a prospective basis. Early adoption is permitted.  The Company also considered the impact of subtopic ASC 340-40. Prior todoes not anticipate that the adoption of Topic 606,this ASU will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements or the Company expensed commission costs and related fringe benefits as incurred. Under ASC 340-40, the Company is required to capitalize and amortize the incremental costs of obtaining or fulfilling a contract over the period of the expected benefit. Incremental costs of obtaining and fulfilling a contract are recognized as an asset if the costs are expected to be recovered.disclosures.

 

In January 2020, the FASB issued ASU No.2020-01-Investments-Equity Securities (Topic 321), Investments-Equity Method and Joint Ventures (Topic 323), and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)-Clarifying the Interactions between Topic 321, Topic 323, and Topic 815. This ASU clarifies the interaction between accounting standards related to equity securities (Accounting Standard Codification or “ASC” 321), equity method investments (ASC 323), and certain derivatives (ASC 815). The most significant impacts ofamendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company does not anticipate that the adoption of Topic 606 are as follows:this ASU will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements or the related disclosures.

 

At

In August 2020, the FASB issued ASU No.2020-16, Debt – Debt with Conversion and Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and Derivatives and Hedging – Contracts in Entity’s Own Equity (Subtopic 8150-20): Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity, which is intended to simplify the adoption date, the Company recorded a net decrease of $4.4 million to accumulated deficit related to the acceleration of revenue required by the adoption of Topic 606 using the modified retrospective method and the capitalization of incremental sales commission costs, net of related deferred tax impact. Under the modified retrospective method, a portion of revenue for uncompleted contracts, which would have been recognized in future periods under Topic 605, was accelerated and recognized as an adjustment to accumulated deficit as of the date of adoption. As a result, the beginning balance of accounts receivable on January 1, 2018 increased by $0.8 million, contract assets were established at $1.9 million and deferred revenue decreased by $2.5 million. The Company capitalized $0.5 million of incremental sales commission costs at the adoption date directly related to obtaining customer contracts and will amortize these costs over the lives of the contracts for which such commissions are paid.

For fiscal 2018, revenue generated under Topic 606 is expected to be slightly higher than revenue would have been under Topic 605. This is the result of a combination of factors, including the reduction of deferred revenue that under Topic 605 would continue to be recognized as revenue in 2018 and beyond, as well as changes in the timing of revenue recognition as discussed below. The actual effect on revenue recognized for the year ended December 31, 2018 was approximately $1.2 million.

The adoption of Topic 606 impacted the Company’s accounting for certain commercial software multi-element arrangements that combine software-related deliverables, which may include softwarefinancial instruments with characteristics of liabilities and equity, including convertible instruments and contracts with varying terms and service elements. Topic 605 required establishing vendor specific objective evidence of fair value ("VSOE"),on an entity’s own equity. The guidance allows for undelivered elementseither full retrospective adoption or modified retrospective adoption. Additionally, the ASU will require entities to recognize revenue separatelyuse the “if-converted” method when calculating diluted earnings per share for each of the different elements. Topic 606 requires the Company to allocate consideration to each separate different performance obligation through the use of stand-alone selling prices (“SSPs”) and to recognize the revenue as if those performance obligations had been sold on a standalone basis, either at a point-in-time or over time.convertible instruments. The most significant impact of this change relates to the Company’s accounting for software license revenue. For the Company’s Exensio software that is licensed under a time-based license model, the Company will recognize a portion of revenue on these types of contracts at the time of delivery rather than ratably over the term of the license. For perpetual software license contracts, the Company will allocate consideration to the different performance obligations based on their SSPs rather than using the VSOE for undelivered elements as required under Topic 605. 

Under the Company’s previous accounting practices, revenue was recognized from Gainshare performance incentive agreements in the period of receipt of related Gainshare acknowledgement reports, which was generally one quarter in arrears from the period in which the underlying sales (usage) occurred. Under Topic 606, the Company is required to record Gainshare revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs. Because the Company generally does not receive the acknowledgment reports during a given quarter within the time frame necessary to adequately review the reports and include the actual amounts in its quarterly results for such quarter, the Company accrues the related revenue based on estimates of the customer's underlying sales achievement. As a result of accruing revenue for the quarter based on such estimates, adjustmentsASU will be required in the following quarter to true-up revenue to the actual amounts reported.

Under Topic 605, theeffective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2023 for SRCs and interim periods within those annual periods. Early adoption is permitted. The Company recognized revenue for professional services, including revenue from fixed price solution implementation service contracts, either on a percentage-of-completion method or time-and-materials method. Under Topic 606, revenue related to these professional services will remain substantially unchanged.

The following table summarizes the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2018:

(In thousands)

 

As reported under

Topic 606

  

Adjustments

  

Balances under

Topic 605

 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance

 $51,570  $(979) $50,591 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  9,562   (2,980)  6,582 

Deferred tax assets

  19,044   443   19,487 

Other non-current assets

  6,972   (34)  6,938 

Deferred revenues – current portion

  8,477   1,918   10,395 

Long-term income taxes payable

  3,751   (1,032)  2,719 

Other non-current liabilities

  2,831   787   3,618 

Accumulated deficit

  (30,452)  (5,223)  (35,675)

The Company’s net cash provided by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2018 did does not change due to anticipate that the adoption of Topic 606. The following table summarizesthis ASU will have a significant impact on its consolidated financial statements or the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the financial statement line items of the Company’s consolidated statement of cash flows for the year December 31, 2018: related disclosures.

 

(In thousands)

 

As reported under

Topic 606

  

Adjustments

  

Balances under

Topic 605

 

Net loss

 $(7,716) $(870) $(8,586)

Adjustments to reconcile loss to net cash provided by operating activities:

            

Deferred taxes

  (4,171)  (127)  (4,298)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

            

Accounts receivable

  6,828   187   7,015 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  (2,115)  588   (1,527)

Other non-current assets

  3,560   34   3,594 

Deferred revenue

  2,451   188   2,639 

2.  REVENUE

 

The Company derives revenue from two sources: Design-to-silicon-yield solutionsAnalytics revenue and Gainshare performance incentives.Integrated Yield Ramp revenue.

 

The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and its related amendments (collectively known as “ASC 606”). ASC 606 outlines a single comprehensive model to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. Revenue is recognized when control of products or services is transferred to customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those promised products or services.

 

The Company determines revenue recognition through the following five steps:

 

Identification of the contract, or contracts, with a customer

 

Identification of the performance obligations in the contract

 

Determination of the transaction price

 

Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract

 

Recognition of revenue when, or as, performance obligations are satisfied

 

The Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance, and collectability of consideration is probable.

Contracts with multiple performance obligations

 

The Company enters into contracts that can include various combinations of licenses, products and services, some of which are distinct and are accounted for as separate performance obligations. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocates the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation generally on a relative basis using its standalone selling price. The Company does not adjust transaction price for the effects of a significant financing component when the period between the transfers of the promised good or service to the customer and payment for that good or service by the customer is expected to be one year or less. The Company assessed each of its revenue generating arrangements in order to determine whether a significant financing component exists, and determined its contracts do not include a significant financing component for the year ended December 31, 2018.

 

Nature of Products and Services

Design-to-silicon-yield Solutions —The Company recognizes revenue for each element of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions as follows:

The Company generates a significant portion of its Design-to-silicon-yield solutions revenue from fixed-price solution implementation service contracts delivered over a specific period of time. Revenue under project–based contracts for solution implementation services is recognized as services are performed using a percentage-of-completion method based on costs or labor-hours inputs. Due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of costs or hours at completion is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by the Company to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs, or the extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs. Losses on fixed-price solution implementation contracts are recognized in the period when they become probable. Revisions in profit estimates are reflected in the period in which the conditions that require the revisions become known and can be estimated (the cumulative catch-up method).

 

  

On occasion,Analytics Revenue

Analytics revenue is derived from the Company includes its products as a component of its fixed-price service contracts. In such instances,following primary offerings: licenses for software, SaaS, Data Connectivity and Equipment Control Software, DFI™ and CV® systems that do not include performance incentives based on customers’ yield achievement, and services related to the Company determinesforegoing.

Revenue from standalone software is recognized depending on whether the services performed and products included are distinct. In most cases, the arrangementlicense is a single performance obligation and therefore, follows the pattern of transfer as the service is provided. The Company applies a measure of progress (typically hours-to-hoursperpetual or cost-to-cost) to any fixed consideration. As a result, revenue is generally recognized over the period the services are performed using the percentage-of-completion method. This results in revenue recognition that corresponds with the value to the client of the services transferred to-date relative to the remaining services promised.

The Company also licenses our Design-for-Inspection ("DFI") system as a separate component of fixed-price service contracts. The Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their SSPs. In such instances, the Company applies judgment to estimate the range of SSPs for each performance obligation. 

The Company licenses some of its software products separately from solution implementations, primarily its Exensio software platform and related products.  The majority of these products are delivered as on-premise software licenses, while others can be delivered entirely or partially through Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) or cloud delivery models. Revenue from perpetual (one-timetime-based. Perpetual ( one-time charge) license software is recognized at the time of the inception of the arrangement when control transfers to the client,customers, if the software license is distinctconsidered as a separate performance obligation from the services offered by the Company. Revenue from post-contract support subscription is recognized over the contract term on a straight-line basis, because the Company iswe are providing (i) a service of standing ready to provide support when-and-if needed, and (ii) unspecified software upgradesupdates on a when-and-if available basis over the contract term. Revenue from time-based licensetime-based-licensed software is allocated to each performance obligation and is recognized either at a point-in-timepoint in time or over-time.over time as follows. The license component is recognized at the time of the delivery of the software license,when control transfers to customers, with the post-contract support subscription component being recognized ratably over for the committed term of the contract. For contracts with any combination of licenses, support, and other services, distinct performance obligations are accounted for separately. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using standalone selling price (or SSP) attributed to each performance obligation.

Revenue from software hosting orExensio SaaS arrangements, thatwhich allow for the use of a hostedcloud-based software product or service over a contractually determined period of time without takingthe customer having to take possession of software, areis accounted for as subscriptionsa subscription and is recognized as revenue ratably, on a straight-line basis, over the coveragesubscription period beginning on the date the service is firstmade available to customers. For contracts with any combination of SaaS and related services, distinct performance obligations are accounted for separately. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using SSP attributed to each performance obligation.

 

Gainshare Performance Incentives — Contracts to provideRevenue from DFI™ and CV® systems that do not include performance incentives based on customers’ yield improvementachievement is recognized primarily as services have historically included two components: (1) a fixed fee forare performed. Where there are distinct performance byobligations, the Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their SSPs. For these contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company allocate the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using SSP attributed to each performance obligation. Where there are not discrete performance obligations, historically, revenue is primarily recognized as services are performed using a percentage of completion method based on costs or labor-hours inputs, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. The estimation of percentage of completion method is complex and subject to many variables that require significant judgement. Please refer to “Significant Judgments” section of this Note for further discussion.

Integrated Yield Ramp Revenue

Integrated Yield Ramp revenue is derived from the Company’s fixed-fee engagements that include performance incentives based on customers’ yield achievement and Gainshare royalties, typically based on customer’s wafer shipments, pertaining to these fixed-price contracts, which royalties are variable.

Revenue under these project–based contracts, which are delivered over a specific period of time;time, typically for a fixed fee component paid on a set schedule, is recognized as services are performed using a percentage of completion method based on costs or labor-inputs, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. Where there are distinct performance obligations, the Company allocates revenue to all deliverables based on their SSPs and (2)allocates the transaction price of the contract to each performance obligation on a relative basis using SSP. Similar to the services provided in connection with DFI™ and CV® systems that are contributing to Analytics revenue, due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of percentage of completion method is complex and subject to many variables that require significant judgement. Please refer to “Significant Judgments” section of this Note for further discussion.

The Gainshare performance incentive component where the customer paysroyalty contained in IYR contracts is a variable fee usually after the fixed fee period has ended, related to thecontinued usage of the Company'sCompany’s intellectual property.property after the fixed-fee service period ends, based on a customer’s yield achievement. Revenue derived from Gainshare performance incentives is contingent upon the Company’s customers reaching certain defined production yield levels. Gainshare performance incentiveroyalty periods are usuallygenerally subsequent to the delivery of all contractual services and performance obligations. The Company records Gainshare revenue as a usage-based royalty based on customers'derived from customers’ usage of intellectual property and records it in the same period in which the usage occurs.

 

The following table summarizes the effects of adopting Topic 606 on the financial statement line items of the Company’s consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018:

(In thousands)

 

As reported under

Topic 606

  

Adjustments

  

Balances under

Topic 605

 

Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

 $60,081  $(711) $59,370 

Gainshare performance incentives

  25,713   (470)  25,243 

Total revenue

  85,794   (1,181)  84,613 

Gross profit

  42,991   (1,181)  41,810 

Selling, general and administrative

  23,934   (75)  23,859 

Total operating expenses

  52,943   (75)  52,868 

Loss from operations

  (9,952)  (1,106)  (11,058)

Loss before taxes

  (9,459)  (1,106)  (10,565)

Income tax benefit

  (1,743)  (235)  (1,978)

Net loss

 $(7,716) $(870) $(8,586)

Disaggregation of revenueRevenue

 

In accordance with ASC 606-10-50, theThe Company disaggregates revenue from contracts with customers into geographical regions, major contract performance obligations, andthe timing of the transfer of goods and services.services and the geographical regions. The Company has determined that disaggregating revenue into these categories achieves the disclosure objective to depict how the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors.

 

The following table shows the revenues from contracts with customers by the nature of transactions for the year ended December 31, 2018 (in thousands):

  

Year Ended

December 31, 2018

 

Licenses and Gainshare Performance Incentives

 $31,336 

Support and services

  53,486 

Other

  972 

Total

 $85,794 

Licenses and Gainshare Performance Incentives revenue is comprised of (i) the software license fees for perpetual and time-based software license contracts where the standalone selling prices are estimable by the Company, or distinct and separate performance obligations; and (ii) the variable fee component of the Company’s yield improvement service contracts, or Gainshare Performance Incentives, which is usually recognized as revenue subsequent to the delivery of all contractual services and performance obligations. The services component of such contracts, including recurring fees for unspecified software updates and technical support, is presented as support and services.

Under Topic 606, the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied either over time or at a point-in-time or over-time Revenue from performance obligations, satisfied over time and atpoint-in-time. The following table represents a point-in-time, accounted for approximately 63% and 37% for the year ended December 31, 2018, respectively. disaggregation of revenue by timing of revenue:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Over time

  63%  66%

Point-in-time

  37%  34%

Total

  100%  100%

International revenues accounted for approximately 60%, 61% and 64%58% of total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2020 and 2016, respectively.2019. See Note 11,14, Customer and Geographic Information.

 

Significant Judgments

 

More judgmentsJudgments and estimates are required under Topic 606 than were required under Topic 605.ASC 606. Due to the complexity of certain contracts, the actual revenue recognition treatment required under Topic ASC 606 for the Company’s arrangements may be dependent on contract-specific terms and may vary in some instances.

 

In services arrangements, the Company typically satisfies the performance obligation and recognizes revenue over time. In service arrangements, the performance obligation is satisfied over time either because the client controls the asset as it is created (e.g., when the asset is built at the customer site) or because the Company’s performance does not create an asset with an alternative use and the Company has an enforceable right to payment plus a reasonable profit for performance completed to-date. In most other services arrangements, the performance obligation is satisfied over time because the client simultaneously receives and consumes the benefits provided as the Company performs the services. 

For revenue under project–basedproject-based contracts for fixed-price solution implementation services, revenue is recognized as services are performed using thea percentage-of-completion method based on costs or the labor-hours input method, whichever is the most appropriate measure of the progress towards completion of the contract. Due to the nature of the work performed in these arrangements, the estimation of percentage-of-completionpercentage of completion method is complex, subject to many variables and requires significant judgment. Key factors reviewed by the Company to estimate costs to complete each contract are future labor and product costs and expected productivity efficiencies. If circumstances arise that change the original estimates of revenues, costs, or extent of progress toward completion, revisions to the estimates are made. These revisions may result in increases or decreases in estimated revenues or costs, and such revisions are reflected in revenue on a cumulative catch-up basis in the period in which the circumstances that gave rise to the revision become known.


 

SSPs for each performance obligation. In instances where SSP is not directly observable because the Company does not license the software or sell the service separately, the Company determines the SSP using information that may include market conditions and other observable inputs.

 

The Company is required to record Gainshare performance incentivesroyalty revenue in the same period in which the usage occurs. Because the Company generally does not receive the acknowledgment reports from its customers during a given quarter within the time frame necessary to adequately review the reports and include the actual amounts in its quarterly results for such quarter, the Company accrues the related revenue based on estimates of customer'scustomers underlying sales achievement. The CompanyCompany’s estimation process can be based on historical data, trends, seasonality, changes in the contract rate, knowledge of the changes in the industry and changes in the customer’s manufacturing environment learned through discussions with customers and sales personnel. As a result of accruing revenue for the quarter based on such estimates, adjustments will be required in the following quarter to true-up revenue to the actual amounts reported.

 

Contract Balances  

 

The Company performs its obligationobligations under a contract with a customer by transferring productslicensing software or providing services in exchange for consideration from the customer. The timing of the Company’s performance often differs from the timing of the customer’s payment, which results in the recognition of a receivable, a contract asset or a contract liability. See Note 1 for further information about accounts receivable.

The Company classifies the right to consideration in exchange for productssoftware or services transferred to a clientcustomer as either a receivable or a contract asset. A receivable is a right to consideration that is unconditional, as compared to a contract asset, which is a right to consideration that is conditional upon factors other than the passage of time. The majority of the Company’s contract assets represent unbilled amounts related to fixed-price solution implementation service contracts when the costs or labor-hours input method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the client, and the right to consideration is subject to milestone completion or client acceptance.customer. The contract assets are generally classified as current and are recorded on a net basis with deferred revenue (i.e. contract liabilities) at the contract level. TheAt December 31, 2020 and 2019, contract assets of $3.7 million and $3.6 million, respectively, are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheets at beginning of 2018.Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company did not record any asset impairment charges related to contract assets that were recognized at the beginning of 2018 was $1.9 million. The contract assets included in prepaid expensesduring fiscal year 2020 and other current assets in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet was $2.7 million as December 31, 2018. The change in the contract assets balance during the period relates to the recording of revenues for which the right to consideration is subject to milestone completion or client acceptance and movement of previously recorded contract assets to receivables as the right to consideration becomes unconditional. 2019.

Deferred revenues consist substantially of amounts invoiced in advance of revenue recognition and isare recognized as the revenue recognition criteria are met. Deferred revenues that will be recognized during the succeeding twelve-monthtwelve-month period isare recorded as current deferred revenues and the remaining portion is recorded as non-current deferred revenues. This balance was recorded in the other non-current liabilities in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. The non-current portion of deferred revenue included in other non-current liabilities as of December 31, 2020 and 2019was $1.0$1.2 million and $0.9$2.3 million, respectively, as of respectively. Revenue recognized for the years ended December 31, 2018 2020 and January 1, 2018.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company recognized $6.3 million of revenue2019, that was included in the total deferred revenue balance, as adjusted for Topic 606,revenues and billings in excess of recognized revenues balances at the beginning of 2018.each reporting period was $10.7 million and $8.8 million, respectively.

 

At December 31, 2018, 2020, the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations related to customer contracts that were unsatisfied or partially unsatisfied was approximately $47.1$108.1 million. Given the applicable contract terms with customers, the majority of this amount is expected to be recognized as revenue over the next two years, with the remainder in the following fivethree years. This amount does not include insignificant contracts to which the customer is not committed, nor contracts with original expected lengths of one year or less, norsignificant contracts for which we recognize revenue equal to the amount we have the right to invoice for services performed, or future sales-based or usage-based royalty payments in exchange for a license of intellectual property. This amount is subject to change due to future revaluations of variable consideration, terminations, other contract modifications, or currency adjustments. The estimated timing of the recognition of remaining unsatisfied performance obligations is subject to change and is affected by changes to the scope, changeschange in timing of delivery of products and services, or contract modifications.

 

Payment terms and conditions vary by contract type, although terms generally include a requirement of payment within 30The adjustment to 90 days. In instances whererevenue recognized in the timing of revenue recognition differs from the timing of invoicing, the Company has determined that its contracts generally do not include a significant financing component. The primary purpose of invoicing terms is to provide customers with simplified and predictable ways of purchasing the Company’s products and services, and not to facilitate financing arrangements.

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2018, the amount of revenue recognized2020 and 2019 from significant performance obligations satisfied (or partially satisfied) in previous periods was $1.8 million. This amountan increase of $0.1 million and $3.2 million, respectively. These amounts primarily representsrepresent changes ofin estimated percentage-of–completionpercentage-of-completion based contracts and changes in actual versus estimated Gainshare performance incentives for those customers that reported actual Gainshare revenue with some time lag.royalty.

 

Costs to obtain or fulfill a contract

 

The Company capitalizes the incremental costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer, including direct sales commissions and related fees, when it expects to recover those costs. As a result, these costs will need to be capitalized and amortized over an appropriate period, which may exceed the initial contract term. The incremental costs of obtaining a contract are costs that would not have been incurred if the contract had not been obtained. The Company uses the portfolio method to recognize the amortizationAmortization expense related to these capitalized costs related to initial contracts and renewals and such expense is recognized over the period associated with the revenue offrom which the related portfolio.cost was incurred. Total capitalized direct sales commission costs included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2018, were2020 and 2019 was $0.8 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Total capitalized direct sales commission costs included in other non-current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $0.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively. Amortization of these assets for each of the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $0.5 million and the amortization of these assets were $0.4 million, for the year ended December 31, 2018. respectively. There was no impairment loss in relation to the costs capitalized for the periods presented.

Certain eligible initial project costs are capitalized when the costs relate directly to the contract, the costs generate or enhance resources of the Company that will be used in satisfying the performance obligation in the future, and the costs are expected to be recovered. These costs primarily consist of transition and set-up costs related to the installation of systems and processes and other deferred fulfillment costs eligible for capitalization.  Capitalized costs are amortized consistent with the transfer to the clientcustomer of the services to which the asset relates and are recorded as a component of cost of revenues. The Company also incurredincurs certain direct costs to provide solution implementation services in relation to the specific anticipated contracts. The Company recognizes such costs as a component of cost of revenues, the timing of which is dependent upon identification of a contract arrangement. The Company also defers costs from arrangements that required us to defer the revenues, typically due to the pattern of transfer of the performance obligations in the contract. These costs are recognized in proportion to the related revenue. At the end of the reporting period, the Company evaluates its deferred costs for their probable recoverability. Deferred costs balance included in prepaid expenses and other current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets was immaterial as of December 31, 2020 and was $0.3 million as of December 31, 2019.  Deferred costs balance included in other non-current assets in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets was immaterial as of December 31, 2020 and was $0.2 million as of December 31, 2019. The Company recognizes impairment of deferred costs when it is determined that the costs no longer have future benefits and are no longer recoverable. There was no impairment loss in relation to the costs capitalized for the periods presented.

Practical Expedients

The deferredCompany does not adjust transaction price for the effects of a significant financing component when the period between the transfers of the promised good or service to the customer and payment for that good or service by the customer is expected to be one year or less. The Company assessed each of its revenue generating arrangements in order to determine whether a significant financing component exists, and determined its contracts did not include a significant financing component for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019.

3.  STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT WITH ADVANTEST AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

On July 29, 2020, the Company entered into a long-term strategic partnership with Advantest Corporation through its wholly-owned subsidiary, Advantest America, Inc. (collectively referred to herein as “Advantest”) that includes:

i. Securities Purchase Agreement and Stockholder Agreement

Pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement (“SPA”), the Company issued an aggregate of 3,306,924 shares of its common stock, par value $0.00015 per share (the “SPA Shares”), at a purchase price equal to $19.7085 per share to Advantest for aggregate gross proceeds of $65.2 million.

In connection with the SPA, the Company entered into a Stockholder Agreement (the “Stockholder Agreement”) with Advantest on July 30, 2020. Pursuant to the Stockholder Agreement, Advantest agreed that the SPA Shares will be subject to a five-year lock-up period and Advantest will be subject to a five-year standstill period. The lock-up periods shall terminate upon occurrence of certain events (“Termination Event”) stipulated in the Stockholder Agreement.  Advantest is permitted to sell, transfer or dispose of the SPA Shares at any time to an affiliate or in order to maintain Advantest’s equivalent percentage beneficial ownership at 9.9% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock. Prior to the expiration of the lock-up period, upon the occurrence of certain events, for so long as the SPA Shares constitute at least 2.0% of the Company’s outstanding shares of common stock, if Advantest proposes to sell, transfer or dispose of any SPA Shares, the SPA Shares can be repurchased by the Company in its sole option at a repurchase price to be determined pursuant to the SPA.

Pursuant to the Stockholder Agreement, for so long as a Termination Event has not occurred, Advantest agreed to vote the SPA Shares in the manner recommended by the Board of Directors as reflected in any Company proxy statement, except on matters of: (i) the issuance of Company securities subject to Nasdaq Rule 5635(b), (ii) the approval of any merger, consolidation, or amalgamation (or similar business combination) of the Company, (iii) an amendment of the Company’s Certificate of Incorporation that would disproportionately and adversely affect Advantest, or (iv) any voluntary or involuntary bankruptcy, dissolution, insolvency, reorganization, rehabilitation or similar event of the Company.

There was no occurrence of any of the termination events as of the issuance of these consolidated financial statements.

ii. Amendment #1 to Software License & Related Services Agreement

The Company entered into Amendment #1 to that certain Software License and Related Services Agreement (“SLA”), dated as of March 25, 2020 (“Amendment #1 to SLA”) with Advantest. Amendment #1 to SLA provides for an exclusive commercial arrangement in which the Company and Advantest will collaborate on, and the Company will initially host, develop and maintain, an Advantest-specific cloud layer on the Exensio platform. Amendment #1 to SLA provides for a renewable five-year cloud-based subscription by Advantest to the Company’s Exensio analytics platform and related services to be provided by the Company for an aggregate subscription price of over $50.0 million over the initial five-year term, subject to the achievement of certain milestones and the Company’s standard warranty and service level commitments.

iii. Development Agreement

The Company also entered into a multi-year Amended and Restated Master Development Agreement (the “Development Agreement”) with Advantest, pursuant to which the Company and Advantest agreed to collaborate on extensions to or combinations of both of their existing technology and new technology to address mutual customers’ needs (the “Integrated Products”) through one or more development phases subject to certain conditions as set forth therein. The Development Agreement includes the Company’s assistance in the development of a cloud-based software solution for Advantest’s customers that is based on the Company’s Exensio

software analytics platform for both Advantest’s internal use as well as use by Advantest’s customers. Except as may be separately set forth in a statement of work, each party will bear its own costs balance and expenses incurred in connection with its development thereunder. Either party may terminate the Development Agreement or any statement of work thereunder at any time upon thirty (30) days’ prior written notice.

iv. Commercial Agreement

Costs and expenses incurred related to the Development Agreement have not been significant for the year ended December 31, 2020.

The Company also entered into a multi-year Master Commercial Terms and Support Services Agreement (the “Commercial Agreement”) with Advantest. Pursuant to the Commercial Agreement, the Company and Advantest agreed to (i) commercialize and sell Integrated Products that are generated from the Development Agreement according to revenue sharing for each Integrated Product (as defined in the Commercial Agreement) as generally set forth in the Commercial Agreement and Integrated-Product specific revenue sharing and other terms agreed by the parties from time to time in addenda entered into thereunder; and (ii) provide technical services to support end customers’ use of the Integrated Products according to agreed-upon technical support sharing principles as set forth in the Commercial Agreement. Either party may terminate the Commercial Agreement at any time upon ninety (90) days’ prior written notice. Notwithstanding the foregoing, each party agreed to provide continuing technical support services for Integrated Products sold prior to termination as generally set forth in the Commercial Agreement.

Costs and expenses incurred related to the Commercial Agreement with Advantest have not been significant for the year ended December 31, 2020.

Analytics revenue recognized from Advantest during the year ended December 31, 2020 was $0.2$3.4 million. Accounts receivable from Advantest amounted to $0.3 million, and $0.6deferred revenue amounted to $5.9 million as of December 31, 20182020.

The Company carries out transactions with Advantest on arm’s length commercial customary terms.

4.  BUSINESS COMBINATION

On December 1, 2020 (the “Acquisition Date”), the Company acquired all the stock of Cimetrix Incorporated via a reverse triangular merger pursuant to which a newly formed subsidiary of the Company merged with and into Cimetrix, with Cimetrix as the surviving entity and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. Cimetrix a global provider of equipment connectivity products for smart manufacturing and Industry 4.0 that enable factory equipment to communicate to increase productivity, reduce costs, and improve quality. Cimetrix products are used by over 150 capital equipment companies to provide factory automation connectivity for hundreds of equipment types. The combination of Cimetrix connectivity products and platforms with the Company’s Exensio analytics platform powered by machine learning, is intended to enable IC, assembly, and electronics manufacturer customers to extract more intelligence from their tools, not just data, to build more reliable chips and systems at lower manufacturing costs. The total cash consideration for this acquisition was $35.0 million, net of cash on Cimetrix’s balance sheet as of closing, and subject to other closing adjustments, for all of the outstanding equity of Cimetrix.

The Company accounted for this acquisition as a business combination in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 805, Business Combinations. This method requires that assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination be recognized at their respective estimated fair values as of the Acquisition Date. The excess of purchase consideration over the fair value of net tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired was recorded as goodwill. The goodwill recorded from this acquisition represents business benefits the Company anticipates from the acquired workforce and expectation for expanded sales opportunities to foster further business growth. Due to the nature of the transaction, the goodwill associated with the acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes. As of December 31, 2017, respectively.2020, payment made for this acquisition, net of cash acquired, amounted to $28.6 million and was funded from available cash of the Company. The balanceCompany held back $3.5 million of the purchase price (the “Holdback Amount”) to satisfy adjustments and claims for indemnity arising out of breaches of certain representations, warranties and covenants, and certain other enumerated items in the merger agreement. The Holdback Amount, as adjusted, is expected to be paid to the participating equity holders on approximately the twelve-month anniversary of the Acquisition Date. The Holdback Amount is recorded under “Accrued and other current liabilities” in the 2020 Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The allocation of the purchase price for this acquisition, as of the date of the acquisition, is as follows (in thousands, except amortization period):

  

Amount

  Amortization Period (Years) 

Allocation of Purchase Price:

       

Assets

       

Fair value of tangible assets (including cash of $5,900)

 $8,403    

Fair value of intangible assets:

       

Developed technology

  12,541  

8

 

In-process R&D

  3,635  N/A 

Customer relationships

  1,967  

10

 

Noncompetition agreements

  848  

3

 

Tradenames and trademarks

  808  

10

 

Goodwill

  13,481  N/A 

Total assets acquired

 $41,683    

Liabilities

       

Accounts payable and accrued expenses

 $1,437    

Deferred revenue

  391    

Operating lease liabilities

  132    

Deferred tax liabilities

  1,743    

Total liabilities assumed

 $3,703    

Total consideration, net

 $37,980    

The estimated fair value of accounts receivable acquired approximates the contractual value of $1.6 million.

Pursuant to the merger agreement, the Company will also make payments to certain employees, subject to their continued employment with Cimetrix, through the second quarter of 2024. The estimated total cash payout is about $1.4 million and will be paid at various scheduled payout dates. This amount will be recognized as compensation expense over the period as services are rendered. As of December 31, 2020, accrued compensation recorded under “Accrued compensation and related benefits” in the Consolidated Balance Sheet amounted to $0.3 million.

Acquisition-Related Transaction Costs - Transaction expenses related to the acquisition of Cimetrix aggregated  $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2020. These costs consist of professional fees and administrative costs and were expensed as incurred in the Company’s Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Loss.

The amount of revenues related to Cimetrix that was included in prepaid expenses and other current assets and other non-current assets in the accompanyingCompany’s consolidated balance sheets.statement of comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2020 since the acquisition date was not significant. Unaudited pro forma information is not included as the Company deemed the transaction to not qualify as a significant business combination.

 

 

3.5.  PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

 

Property and equipment consist of (in thousands):

 

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Computer equipment

 $11,585  $10,880 

Software

  5,451   4,690 

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

  2,507   2,395 

Leasehold improvements

  6,255   6,095 

Laboratory and other equipment

  3,451   4,933 

Test equipment

  26,010   22,980 

Construction-in-progress

  20,278   18,245 
   75,537   70,218 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (36,295)  (29,420)

Total

 $39,242  $40,798 

  

December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

 

Computer equipment

 $10,536  $10,729 

Software

  4,112   3,348 

Furniture, fixtures, and equipment

  4,688   3,676 

Leasehold improvements

  5,474   1,980 

Test equipment

  14,697   13,796 

Construction-in-progress

  20,293   12,527 
   59,800   46,056 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (24,119

)

  (20,670

)

Total

 $35,681  $25,386 
63

 

Test equipment includes DFIDFI™ assets at customer sites that are contributing to Analytics revenue from DFI solution revenues.systems. The construction-in-progress balance related to construction of DFIDFI™ assets totaled $17.4$18.9 million and $10.9$16.6 million as of  December 31, 2018, 2020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense for years ended  December 31, 2018, 2017, 2020 and 20162019 was $5.0 million, $4.8$6.7 million and $3.6$6.0 million, respectively.

 

46.   GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

The Company completed the acquisition of Cimetrix in the year ended December 31, 2020.  Refer to Note 4 for additional information related to the goodwill and intangible assets added from this acquisition.

As of December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017,2019, the carrying amountamounts of goodwill was $1.9 million.were $15.8 million and $2.3 million, respectively. The following table summarizes goodwill transaction for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019:

  

December 31,

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Balance at beginning of year

 $2,293  $2,293 

Addition

  13,481   0 

Balance at end of year

 $15,774  $2,293 

 

Intangible assets balance was $5.1$24.6 million and $6.1$6.2 million as of December 31, 2018, 2020 and December 31, 2017,2019, respectively. Intangible assets as of December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017,2019, consist of the following (in thousands):following:

 

      

December 31, 2018

  

December 31, 2017

    

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 
 

Amortization

  

Gross

      

Net

  

Gross

      

Net

  

Amortization

 

Gross

    

Net

 

Gross

    

Net

 
 

Period

  

Carrying

  

Accumulated

  

Carrying

  

Carrying

  

Accumulated

  

Carrying

  

Period

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

 

Carrying

 

Accumulated

 

Carrying

 

(Dollars in thousands)

 

(Years)

  

Amount

  

Amortization

  

Amount

  

Amount

  

Amortization

  

Amount

  

(Years)

 

Amount

  

Amortization

  

Amount

  

Amount

  

Amortization

  

Amount

 

Customer relationships

  1-9  $6,740  $(4,514) $2,226  $6,740  $(4,145) $2,595  1 - 10 $9,407  $(5,398) $4,009  $7,440  $(4,935) $2,505 

Developed technology

  4-9   15,820   (13,404)  2,416   15,820   (12,829)  2,991  4 - 9 30,000  (14,987) 15,013  17,460  (14,101) 3,359 

Tradename

  2-7   790   (648)  142   790   (622)  168 
Tradenames and trademarks 2 - 10 1,598  (706) 892  790  (673) 117 

Patent

  7-10   1,800   (1,520)  280   1,800   (1,480)  320  7 - 10 1,800  (1,600) 200  1,800  (1,560) 240 

Noncompetition agreements

 3 848  (24) 824  0  0  0 
In-process R&D *  3,635      3,635   0      0 

Total

Total

  $25,150  $(20,086) $5,064  $25,150  $(19,076) $6,074    $47,288  $(22,715) $24,573  $27,490  $(21,269) $6,221 

* Non-amortizing intangible asset

 

The weighted average amortization period for acquired identifiable intangible assets was 5.97.4 years as of December 31, 2018.2020. Intangible asset amortization expense for years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2020 and 20162019 was $1.0 million, $0.9$1.4 million and $0.8$1.2 million, respectively. The Company expects annual amortization of acquired identifiable intangible assets to be as follows (in thousands):

 

Year Ending December 31,

       

2019

 $1,009 

2020

  1,009 

2021

  833  $3,221 

2022

  626  3,013 

2023

  626  2,990 

2024 and thereafter

  961 
2024 2,592 
2025 2,427 
2026 and thereafter  6,695 

Total future amortization expense

 $5,064  $20,938 

   

Intangible assets are amortized over their useful lives unless these lives are determined to be indefinite. Intangible assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset or asset group may not be recoverable. During year ended December 31, 2018, there were no indicators of impairment related to the Company’s intangible assets.

5.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Leases

The Company leases administrative and sales offices and certain equipment under noncancelable operating leases, which contain various renewal options and, in some cases, require payment of common area costs, taxes and utilities. These operating leases expire at various times through 2028. Rent expense was $2.5 million, $2.3 million and $2.2 million in 2018, 2017, and 2016, respectively.

 

Future minimum lease payments under noncancelable operating leases at There were 0 impairment charges for goodwill and intangible assets for the year ended December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019.

7.  LEASES

Lease expense was comprised of the following (in thousands):

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Operating lease expense

 $1,828  $1,840 

Short-term lease and variable lease expense

  545   492 

Total lease expense

 $2,373  $2,332 

Supplemental balance sheets information related to leases was as follows:

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Weighted average remaining lease term under operating ROU leases (in years)

  6.4   7.2 

Weighted average discount rate for operating lease liabilities

  5.24

%

  5.25

%

Operating lease ROU assets obtained (in thousands)

 $286  $333 

Maturity of operating lease liabilities as of December 31, 2020, are as follows (in thousands):

 

Year ending December 31,

 

Amount(1)

 

2021

 $1,967 

2022

  1,704 

2023

  1,387 

2024

  1,074 

2025

  1,091 

2026 and thereafter

  2,703 

Total future minimum lease payments

 $9,926 

Less: Interest(2)

  (1,484)

Present value of operating lease liabilities(3)

 $8,442 


(1)

As of December 31, 2020, the total operating lease liability includes $1.0 million related to an option to extend a lease term that is reasonably certain to be exercised.

(2)

Calculated using incremental borrowing interest rate for each lease.

(3)

Includes the current portion of operating lease liabilities of $1.9 million as of December 31, 2020.

Year Ending December 31,

    

2019

 $1,677 

2020

  1,811 

2021

  1,653 

2022

  1,484 

2023

  1,127 

2024 and thereafter

  3,673 

Total future minimum lease payments

 $11,425 
8.  COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

 

IndemnificationsStrategic Partnership with Advantest 

See Note 3 for the discussion about the Company’s commitments under the strategic partnership with Advantest. 

Operating Leases

Refer to Note 7, Leases, for the discussion about the Company’s lease commitments.

Indemnifications

The Company generally provides a warranty to its customers that its software will perform substantially in accordance with documented specifications typically for a period of 90 days following delivery of its products. The Company also indemnifies certain customers from third-partythird-party claims of intellectual property infringement relating to the use of its products. Historically, costs related to these guarantees have not been significant. The Company is unable to estimate the maximum potential impact of these guarantees on its future results of operations.

  

Purchase obligations

 

The Company has purchase obligations with certain suppliers for the purchase of goods and services entered in the ordinary course of business. As of December 31, 2018,2020, total outstanding purchase obligations were $8.7$13.4 million, the majority of which are primarily due within the next 12 months.

 

Indemnification of Officers and Directors

 

As permitted by the Delaware general corporation law, the Company has included a provision in its certificate of incorporation to eliminate the personal liability of its officers and directors for monetary damages for breach or alleged breach of their fiduciary duties as officers or directors, other than in cases of fraud or other willful misconduct.

 

In addition, the Bylaws of the Company provide that the Company is required to indemnify its officers and directors even when indemnification would otherwise be discretionary, and the Company is required to advance expenses to its officers and directors as incurred in connection with proceedings against them for which they may be indemnified. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors containing provisions that are in some respects broader than the specific indemnification provisions contained in the Delaware general corporation law. The indemnification agreements require the Company to indemnify its officers and directors against liabilities that may arise by reason of their status or service as officers and directors other than for liabilities arising from willful misconduct of a culpable nature, to advance their expenses incurred as a result of any proceeding against them as to which they could be indemnified, and to obtain directors’ and officers’ insurance if available on reasonable terms. The Company has obtained directors’ and officers’ liability insurance in amounts comparable to other companies of the Company’s size and in the Company’s industry. Since a maximum obligation of the Company is not explicitly stated in the Company’s Bylaws or in its indemnification agreements and will depend on the facts and circumstances that arise out of any future claims, the overall maximum amount of the obligations cannot be reasonably estimated.

 

Litigation 

 

From time to time, the Company is subject to various claims and legal proceedings that arise in the ordinary course of business. The Company accrues for losses related to litigation when a potential loss is probable, and the loss can be reasonably estimated in accordance with FASB requirements. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Company was not party to any material legal proceedings, thus no loss was probable and no amount was accrued. 

 

On May 6, 2020the Company initiated an arbitration proceeding with the Hong Kong International Arbitration Center against SMIC New Technology Research & Development (Shanghai) Corporation (“SMIC”) due to SMIC’s failure to pay fees due to PDF under a series of contracts. The Company seeks to recover the unpaid fees, a declaration requiring SMIC to pay fees under the contracts in the future, and costs associated with bringing the arbitration proceeding. The arbitration is on-going.  

9.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Issuance of Common Stock

On July 30, 2020, the Company issued 3,306,924 shares of common stock, at a purchase price of $19.7085 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds of $65.2 million pursuant to a Securities Purchase Agreement with Advantest dated July 29, 2020. Issuance costs related to this private placement aggregated $0.1 million. See Note 3, Securities Purchase Agreement with Advantest, for further details.

 

6.  STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Stock Repurchase Program 

  

On October 25, 2016, May 28, 2020, the Company’s 2018 stock repurchase program (the “2018 Program”) that was originally adopted on May 29, 2018, expired. On June 4, 2020, the Company’s Board of Directors adopted a new stock repurchase program that was effective immediately(the “2020 Program”) to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions, including through Rule 10b5-1 plans, over the next two years. On May 29, 2018, the Board of Directors terminated that 2016 stock repurchase program, and adopted a new program to repurchase up to $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock both on the open market and in privately negotiated transactions, from time to time, over the next two years. During the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company repurchased 437,000 shares for $5.2 million under the 2016 program and no2020, 0 shares were repurchased under the 2020 and 2018 program. programs. During year ended December 31, 2019, Company repurchased approximately 785,000 shares under the 2018 Program. As of December 31, 2018, the CompanyMay 28, 2020, approximately 786,000 shares had been repurchased 1,279,000 shares at an average price of $14.59$12.43 per share, under the 2016 program, for a total purchaseprice of $18.7 million. Under$9.8 million under the 2018 program, as of December 31, 2018, $25.0 million of the Company’s common stock remained available for future repurchases. Program.

 

 

710. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLANS

 

On December 31, 2020, the Company had the following stock-based compensation plans:

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

 

In July 2001, the Company adopted a ten-yearten-year Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“ESPP”(as amended, the “2001 Purchase Plan”) under which eligible employees can contribute up to 10% of their compensation, as defined in the ESPP,Purchase Plan, towards the purchase of shares of PDF common stock at a price of 85% of the lower of the fair market value at the beginning of the offering period or the end of the purchase period. The ESPP consists of twenty-four-monthPurchase Plan provided for twenty-four-month offering periods with four six-monthsix-month purchase periods in each offering period. Under the ESPP,Purchase Plan, on January 1 of each year, starting with 2002, the number of shares reserved for issuance will automatically increaseincreased by the lesser of (1)(1) 675,000 shares, (2)(2) 2% of the Company’s outstanding common stock on the last day of the immediately preceding year, or (3)(3) the number of shares determined by the board of directors. At the annual meeting of stockholders on May 18, 2010, the Company'sCompany’s stockholders approved an amendment to the ESPPPurchase Plan to extend it through May 17, 2020 (the “2010 Purchase Plan”). The Company’s proposal at its annual meeting of stockholders in 2020 to extend the 2010 Purchase Plan through June 22, 2030 was not approved by the Company’s stockholders and consequently, the 2010 Purchase Plan expired on May 17, 2020. AsAfter the 2010 Purchase Plan expired, no new offering periods commenced under the Purchase Plan; however, existing offering periods will continue until they expire in accordance with their terms, and participation in such offering periods will continue through the applicable expiration date. The final offering period under the 2010 Purchase Plan is expected to expire on January 31, 2022.

The Company estimated the fair value of purchase rights granted under the 2010 Purchase Plan during the period using the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions, resulting in the following weighted average fair values:

  

2010 Purchase Plan

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Expected life (in years)

  1.25   1.25 

Volatility

  34.25%  44.85%

Risk-free interest rate

  1.43%  2.49%

Expected dividend

  0   0 

Weighted average fair value of purchase rights granted during the period

 $4.83  $4.08 

During the year ended December 31, 2018, 8,734,0002020 and 2019, a total of approximately 183,000 and 172,000 shares, of the Company’s common stock have been reserved for issuance under the ESPP. During 2018, 2017, and 2016, the number of sharesrespectively, were issued were 201,000, 200,000, and 173,000, respectively, at a weighted averageweighted-average purchase price of $9.12 $9.33, and $9.00$8.92 per share, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, 4,738,000 shares were available for future issuance under the ESPP. The weighted average estimated fair value of shares granted under the ESPP during 2018, 2017, and 2016 was $3.62, $5.22, and $3.69 per share, respectively. As of December 31, 2018, 2020, there was $1.5$0.1 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to the ESPP.Purchase Plan. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.58 years.0.6 year. As of December 31, 2020, 5.7 million shares were available for future issuance under the Purchase Plan.

 

Stock Incentive Plans

 

On November 16, 2011, the Company’s stockholders initially approved the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which has been amended and restated and approved by the Company’s stockholders a number of times since then (as amended, the “2011“2011 Plan”). Under the 2011 Plan, the Company may award stock options, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), stock grants or stock units covering shares of the Company’s common stock to employees, directors, non-employee directors and contractors. The aggregate number of shares reserved for awards under this plan is 9,050,00011,550,000 shares, plus up to 3,500,000 shares previously issued under the 2001 Stock Plan

adopted by the Company in 2001, which expired in 2011 (the “2001 Plan”) that are either (i) forfeited or (ii) repurchased by the Company or are shares subject to awards previously issued under the 2001 Plan that expire or that terminate without having been exercised or settled in full on or after November 16, 2011. In case of awards other than options or stock appreciation rights,SARs, the aggregate number of shares reserved under the plan2011 Plan will be decreased at a rate of 1.33 shares issued pursuant to such awards. The exercise price for stock options must generally be at prices no less than the fair market value at the date of grant. Stock options generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable over a four-yearfour-year period.

 

In 2001, the Company adopted a 2001 Stock Plan (the “2001 Plan”). In 2003, in connection with its acquisition of IDS Systems Inc., the Company assumed IDS’ 2001 Stock Option / Stock Issuance Plan (the “IDS Plan”). Both of the 2001 and the IDS Plans expired in 2011. Stock options granted under the 2001 and IDS Plans Plan generally expire ten years from the date of grant and become vested and exercisable over a four-yearfour-year period. Although no new awards may be granted under the 2001 or IDS Plans, Plan, awards made under the 2001 and IDS Plans Plan that are currently outstanding remain subject to the terms of each such plan.


 

As of December 31, 2018, 9.62020, 12.1 million shares of common stock were reserved to cover stock-based awards under the 2011 Plan, of which 3.04.2 million shares were available for future grant. The number of shares reserved and available under the 2011 Plan includes 0.5 million shares that were subject to awards previously made under the 2001 Plan and were forfeited, expired or repurchased by the Company after the adoption of the 2011 Plan through December 31, 2018. 2020. As of December 31, 2018, 2020, there were no outstanding awards that had been granted outside of the 2011 2001 or the IDS2001 Plans (collectively, the "Stock Plans"“Stock Plans”).

 

The Company has elected to use the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model, which incorporates various assumptions including volatility, expected life, interest rate and expected dividend. The expected volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s common stock over the most recent period commensurate with the estimated expected life of the Company’s stock options. The expected life of an award is based on historical experience and on the terms and conditions of the stock awards granted to employees. The interest rate assumption is based upon observed Treasury yield curve rates appropriate for the expected life of the Company’s stock options.

 

The fair value of equity awards granted was estimated on the date of grant with the following weighted average assumptions:

 

Stock Plans

  

Employee Stock
Purchase Plan

  

Stock Plans

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2020

  

2019

 

Expected life (in years)

  4.43   4.42   4.40   1.25   1.25   1.25  4.45  4.46 

Volatility

  43.91

%

  41.5

%

  43.2

%

  42.85

%

  40.63

%

  44.0

%

 40.90% 41.56%

Risk-free interest rate

  2.73

%

  1.81

%

  1.34

%

  2.48

%

  1.25

%

  0.50

%

 0.60% 1.86%

Expected dividend

                   0  0 

Weighted average fair value of options granted during the period

 $5.75  $5.00 

 

Stock-based compensation is estimated at the grant date based on the award’s fair value and is recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting periods, generally four years.  As stock-based compensation expense recognized is based on awards ultimately expected to vest, it has been reduced for estimated forfeitures. Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and revised, if necessary, in subsequent periods if actual forfeitures differ from those estimates.

 

Stock-based compensation expenses related to the Company’s stock plans and employee stock purchase plan were allocated as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Years Ended December 31,

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2020

  

2019

 

Costs of Design-to-silicon-yield solutions

 $3,554  $4,606  $4,427 

Costs of revenues

 $3,454  $3,185 

Research and development

  3,260   3,518   3,087  4,800  4,764 

Selling, general and administrative

  3,481   3,686   3,488   4,209   3,474 

Stock-based compensation expenses

 $10,295  $11,810  $11,002  $12,463  $11,423 

 

The stock-based compensation expense for the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, and 2016 in the table above includes immaterial expense or credit adjustments related to cash-settled stock appreciation rights (“SARs”)SARs granted to certain employees which totaled to a credit of $24,000, a credit of $30,000, and an expense of $116,000, respectively.employees. The Company accounted for these awards as liability awards and the amount was included in accrued compensation and related benefits. SARs were fully exercised in the third quarter of 2020. Stock-based compensation capitalized in the capitalized software development costs included in property and equipment, net, was approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.


 

  

Additional information with respect to options under the Plans is as follows:

 

 

Outstanding Options

          

Outstanding Options

      
 

Number of

Options
(in thousands)

  

Weighted

Average

Exercise

Price
per Share

  

Weighted

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Term
(Years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value
(in thousands)

  

Number of Options (in thousands)

  

Weighted Average Exercise Price per Share

  

Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term (Years)

  

Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands)

 

Outstanding, January 1, 2016

  1,764  $7.88         

Granted (weighted average fair value of $5.36 per share)

  99  $14.55         

Outstanding, January 1, 2019

 1,027  $9.75      

Granted (weighted average fair value of $5.00 per share)

 102  $13.79      

Exercised

  (393) $7.56          (238) $5.41      

Canceled

  (31) $13.82          (87) $14.57      

Expired

  (75) $13.80           (59) $15.83      

Outstanding, December 31, 2016

  1,364  $8.00         

Granted (weighted average fair value of $5.92 per share)

  150  $16.28         

Outstanding, December 31, 2019

 745  $10.64      

Granted (weighted average fair value of $5.75 per share)

 24  $16.72      

Exercised

  (440) $6.42          (246) $10.46      

Canceled

  (25) $15.03          (57) $11.65      

Expired

  (4) $16.46           (10) $10.06      

Outstanding, December 31, 2017

  1,045  $9.65         

Granted (weighted average fair value of $4.08 per share)

  116  $10.35         

Exercised

  (81) $6.93         

Canceled

  (30) $13.41         

Expired

  (23) $13.16         

Outstanding, December 31, 2018

  1,027  $9.75   4.35  $1,121 

Vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2018

  1,006  $9.68   4.25  $1,121 

Exercisable, December 31, 2018

  796  $8.69   3.05  $1,121 

Outstanding, December 31, 2020

  456  $10.95   3.17  $4,864 

Vested and expected to vest, December 31, 2020

  449  $10.88   3.08  $4,818 

Exercisable, December 31, 2020

  379  $10.15   2.05  $4,342 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above represents the total intrinsic value based on the Company’s closing stock price of $8.43$21.60 as of December 31, 2018,2020, which would have been received by the option holders had all option holders exercised their options as of that date. The total intrinsic value of options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2020 and 20162019 was $0.4 million, $5.3$2.2 million and $4.4$1.7 million, respectively.

 

As of December 31, 2018,2020, there was $1.0$0.3 million of total unrecognized compensation cost, net of forfeitures, related to unvested stock options. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 3.062.7 years. The total fair value of options vested during the year ended December 31, 2018,2020, was $0.4$0.3 million.

 

Nonvested shares (restricted stock units) were as follows:

 

 

Shares
(in thousands)

  

Fair Value

  Shares (in thousands)  

Fair Value

 

Nonvested, January 1, 2016

  1,166  $17.03 

Nonvested, January 1, 2019

  1,835  $11.93 

Granted

  963  $14.41   952  $13.52 

Vested

  (472) $17.00   (710) $13.05 

Forfeited

  (115) $15.73   (190) $12.18 

Nonvested, December 31, 2016

  1,542  $15.50 

Nonvested, December 31, 2019

  1,887  $12.30 

Granted

  849  $16.43   890  $21.31 

Vested

  (646) $16.26   (867) $13.25 

Forfeited

  (128) $15.71   (163) $13.23 

Nonvested, December 31, 2017

  1,617  $15.66 

Granted

  983  $8.66 

Vested

  (596) $15.84 

Forfeited

  (169) $14.83 

Nonvested, December 31, 2018

  1,835  $11.93 

Nonvested, December 31, 2020

  1,747  $16.33 

 

As of December 31, 2018,2020, there was $17.6$21.9 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock rights.units. That cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 2.82.6 years. Restricted stock units do not have rights to dividends prior to vesting.

 

401(k)401(k) Savings PlanPlan

 

In 1999, the Company established a 401(k)401(k) tax-deferred savings plan, whereby eligible employees may contributeelect to defer up to 15%60% of their eligible compensation withbut not to exceed the statutorily prescribed limit to the 401(k) plan. The 401(k) plan also has a maximum amount subjectcatch-up contribution feature for employees aged 50 or older who can defer up to IRS guidelines in any calendar year.100% of their eligible compensation but not to exceed the statutorily prescribed limit to the 401(k) plan. Company contributions to this plan are discretionary; no0 such Company contributions have been made since the inception of this plan.

 

 

811. RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

 

On September 27, 2018, the Board of Directors of the Company approved a reduction in its workforce to reduce expenses and align its operations with evolving business needs. Notifications to the affected employees began on October 24, 2018.

 

InFrom inception of the fourth quarter of 2018,restructuring plan to December 31, 2020, the Company has recorded restructuring charges of $576,000 for$0.7 million, primarily consisting of employee separation charges, allcharges. As of which were recorded as operating expenses in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive income (loss) for the year ended December 31, 2018.  

Of the $576,000 for employee separation charges, 2020, the Company paid $332,000 duringhas substantially completed the fourth quarterimplementation of 2018 and cash payments for the remaining restructuring liabilities of $244,000 as of December 31, 2018 are expected to be made in fiscal 2019. The Company is in the process of implementing the restructuring plan, and the remaining charges expected to be incurred couldare not expected to be significant.

 

9.  INCOME TAXESThe following table summarizes the activities of restructuring liabilities under this plan (in thousands): 

 

On December 22, 2017, the 2017 Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (TCJA) was enacted into law and the new legislation contains several key tax provisions that affected the Company, including a one-time mandatory transition tax on accumulated foreign earnings and a reduction of the corporate income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, among others. The Company is required to recognize the effect of the tax law changes in the period of enactment, such as determining the transition tax, remeasuring its U.S. deferred tax assets and liabilities as well as reassessing the net realizability of its deferred tax assets and liabilities. In December 2017, the SEC staff issued Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118, Income Tax Accounting Implications of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (SAB 118), which allowed the Company to record provisional amounts during a measurement period not to extend beyond one year of the enactment date. As a result, the Company previously provided a provisional estimate of the effect of the TCJA in its financial statements. In the fourth quarter of 2018, the Company completed its analysis to determine the effect of the TCJA and recorded immaterial adjustments as of December 31, 2018.

Effective January 1, 2018, the TCJA created a new requirement to include in U.S. income global intangible low-taxed income (“GILTI”) earned by controlled foreign corporations (“CFCs”). The GILTI must be included currently in the gross income of the CFCs’ U.S. shareholder. Under U.S. GAAP, the Company is allowed to make an accounting policy choice of either (1) treating taxes due on future U.S. inclusions related to GILTI as a current-period expense when incurred (the “period cost method”) or (2) factoring such amounts into a company’s measurement of its deferred taxes (the “deferred method”). During the first quarter of 2018, the Company selected the period cost method in recording the tax effects of GILTI in its financial statements.

The Company has not provided for any foreign withholding tax for any undistributed earnings for its foreign subsidiaries as of December 31, 2018. The Company intends to permanently reinvest the foreign earnings outside of the U.S.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Beginning balance

 $0  $244 

Restructuring charges

  0   92 

Cash payments

  0   (336)

Ending balance

 $0  $0 

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 
  

(In thousands)

 

U.S.

            

    Current

 $(84) $(141

)

 $410 

    Deferred

  (4,171)  (471

)

  208 

    Foreign

            

Current

  347   254   329 

    Withholding

  2,165   1,654   2,898 

    Deferred

     (33

)

  8 

Total provision (benefit)

 $(1,743) $1,263  $3,853 

12.  INCOME TAXES

 

During the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017 2020 and 2016, income (loss)2019, loss before taxes from U.S. operations was $(11.1) million, $(1.2)($18.4) million and $11.3($8.7) million, respectively, and income before taxes from foreign operations was $1.6 million, $1.1$0.3 million and $1.6$1.3 million, respectively.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 
  

(In thousands)

 

U.S.

        

Current

 $(1,325) $(107)

Deferred

  21,056   (4,534)

Foreign

        

Current

  238   312 

Withholding

  2,392   2,385 

Deferred

  (58)  2 

Total income tax provision (benefit)

 $22,303  $(1,942)

  

The income tax provision (benefit)benefit differs from the amount estimated by applying the statutory federal income tax rate (21% for 2018,2020 and 35% for 2017 and 2016)2019) for the following reasons (in thousands):

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Federal statutory tax provision

 $(3,793) $(1,546)

State tax provision

  703   (85)

Stock compensation expense

  (602)  234 

Tax credits

  (3,488)  (2,974)

Foreign tax, net

  2,443   2,430 
Tax law changes  (2,237)  0 
Business combination costs  356   0 
Change in valuation allowance  29,034   0 

Other

  (113)  (1)

Total income tax provision (benefit)

 $22,303  $(1,942)

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Federal statutory tax provision

 $(1,986

)

 $(26

)

 $4,534 

State tax provision

  (133

)

  (110

)

  283 

Stock compensation expense

  768

 

  (944

)

  45 

Tax credits

  (2,682

)

  (2,769

)

  (4,000

)

Foreign tax, net

  2,104   1,641   2,852 

Tax law changes

     3,247    

Other

  186   224   139 

Tax provision (benefit)

 $(1,743) $1,263  $3,853 
70

 

As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had Federal and California net operating loss carry-forwards (“NOLs”) of approximately $9.9$30.3 million and $5.9$8.7 million, respectively. TheSome of the Federal NOLs, acquired as part of an acquisition, will expire at the end of 2021and onwards, and the California NOLs begin expiring after 2019 and in 2028 respectively. onwards.

 

As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Company had federal and state research and experimental and other tax credit (“R&D credits”) carry-forwards of approximately $13.6$19.5 million and $17.7$20.3 million, respectively. The federal credits begin to expire after 2025,2022, while the California credits have no expiration. The extent to which the federal and state credit carry forwards can be used to offset future tax liabilities, respectively, may be limited, depending on the extent of ownership changes within any three-yearthree-year period as provided in the Tax Reform Act of 1986 and the California Conformity Act of 1987.

 

The Company assesses its deferred tax assets for recoverability on a regular basis, and where applicable, a valuation allowance is recorded to reduce the total deferred tax asset to an amount that will, more likely than not, be realized in the future. As of December 31, 2018Based on all available evidence, both positive and 2017,negative, the Company believes that most ofdetermined a full valuation allowance was appropriate for its federal and state net deferred tax assets are “more-likely-than not”(DTAs) in the fourth quarter of 2020, primarily driven by an increased cumulative loss incurred over the 12-quarter period ended December 31, 2020 and the likelihood that the Company will not utilize tax attributes before they begin to be realized withexpire at the exceptionend of2022. The valuation allowance was approximately $41.9 million and $10.5 million as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively. As of December 31, 2019, the valuation allowance was primarily related to California R&D tax credits and California net operating losses (NOLs) related to an acquisition that have we currently do not met believe to be “more-likely-than-not” to be ultimately realized. Management will continue to evaluate the “more-likely-than not” realization threshold criteria becauseneed for a valuation allowance and may change its conclusion in a future period based on an annual basisany change in facts (e.g. 12-quarter cumulative profit, significant new revenue, and pursuant to current law,other relevant factors). If the Company generates more California credits than California tax. As a result, at December 31, 2018 and 2017, the excess credits of $9.7 million and $9.0 million, respectively continued to be subject to a full valuation allowance. In addition, the Company had approximately $0.1 million of California NOL carryforward from its acquisition of Syntricity. The Company evaluated positive and negative evidence and concludedconcludes that it wasis more likely than not that the California NOL would not be fully realizable. As a result to utilize some or all of management’s evaluation, the Company recorded fullits US DTAs, it will release some or all of its valuation allowance against its deferredand our tax assets related to its California NOL. The Companyprovision will continue to review its deferred tax assetsdecrease in accordance with the applicable accounting standards.period in which we make such determination. Net deferred tax assets balance as of December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017 was $18.32019 were $0.2 million and $15.5$22.9 million, respectively.

 

The components of the net deferred tax assets are comprised of (in thousands):

 

  

December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

 

Deferred tax assets

        
         

Net operating loss carry forward

 $2,720  $1,318 

Research and development and other credit carry forward

  17,750   16,626 

Foreign tax credit carry forward

  3,994   1,754 

Accruals deductible in different periods

  2,198   3,285 

Intangible assets

  1,081   1,325 

Stock-based compensation

  1,109   1,166 

Valuation allowance

  (9,808)  (9,126

)

Subtotal

 $19,044  $16,348 
         

Deferred tax liabilities

        
         

Fixed assets

  (710)  (835

)

Net deferred tax assets

 $18,334  $15,513 

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Deferred tax assets

        

Net operating loss carry forward

 $8,085  $4,596 

Research and development and other credit carry forward

  24,723   18,944 

Foreign tax credit carry forward

  9,435   6,443 

Accruals deductible in different periods

  3,471   1,968 
Leases  1,669   1,850 

Intangible assets

  0   741 

Stock-based compensation

  1,220   1,271 

Total deferred tax assets

  48,603   35,813 

Less: valuation allowance

  (41,859)  (10,486)
Deferred tax assets, net of valuation allowance $6,744  $25,327 
         

Deferred tax liabilities

        

Property and equipment, net

  (629)  (611)
Operating lease right-of-use assets  (1,669)  (1,850)
Intangible assets  (4,218)  0 
Deferred tax liabilities $(6,516) $(2,461)
         

Net deferred tax assets

 $228  $22,866 

 

In accordance with the accounting standard relating to accounting for uncertain tax positions, the Company classifies its liabilities for income tax exposures as long-term. The Company includes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within the Company’s income tax provision. As of December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017,2019, the Company had accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $0.8 million and $0.7 million, respectively.million.  In the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2020 and 2016,2019, the Company recognized charges for (reversal of) interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits of $84,000, $135,000,$33,000 and $72,000,($1,000) respectively, in the consolidated statementsConsolidated Statements Comprehensive Loss.

 

The Company’s total amount of unrecognized tax benefits, excluding interest and penalties, as of December 31, 20182020 was $13.3$14.3 million, of which $7.8$2.2 million, if recognized, would impact the Company’s effective tax rate. As of December 31, 2018,2020, the Company has recorded unrecognized tax benefits of $3.0$2.9 million, including interest and penalties of $0.8 million, as long-term income taxes payable in its consolidated balance sheet.Consolidated Balance Sheet. The remaining $10.3$12.2 million has been recorded net ofwithin our deferred tax assets, of which $5.5 million is subject to a full valuation allowance. The Company does not expect the change in unrecognized tax benefits over the next twelve months to materially impact its results of operations and financial position.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

  

Amount

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, January 1, 2018

 $12,889 

Increases in tax positions for current year

  664 
Increases in tax positions for prior years  0 

Lapse in statute of limitations

  (261)
Gross unrecognized tax benefits, December 31, 2018  13,292 

Increases in tax positions for current year

  667 

Increases in tax positions for prior years

  1 

Lapse in statute of limitations

  (345)
Gross unrecognized tax benefits, December 31, 2019  13,615 
Increases in tax positions for current year  1,024 
Increases in tax positions for prior years  71 
Lapse in statute of limitations  (410)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, December 31, 2020

 $14,300 

The Company does not provide deferred taxes on undistributed earnings of its foreign subsidiaries as it intends to indefinitely reinvest those earnings.

 

The Company conducts business globally and, as a result, files numerous consolidated and separate income tax returns in the U.S. federal, various state and foreign jurisdictions. Because the Company used some of the tax attributes carried forward from previous years to tax years that are still open, statutes of limitation remain open for all tax years to the extent of the attributes carried forward into tax year 2002 forFor U.S. federal and California income tax purposes.purposes, the statute of limitations currently remains open for the years ending 2017 to present and 2016 to present, respectively. In addition, due to NOL carryback claims, the tax years 2013 through 2015may be subject to federal examination and all of the net operating loss and research and development credit carryforwards that may be utilized in future years may be subject to federal and state examination. The Company is not subject to income tax examinations in any other of its major foreign subsidiaries’ jurisdictions.

 

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows (in thousands):

  

Amount

 

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, January 1, 2016

 $10,979 

Increases in tax positions for current year

  1,118 

Increase in tax positions for prior years

  112 

Lapse in statute of limitations

  (269

)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, December 31, 2016

  11,940 

Increases in tax positions for current year

  1,166 

Increases in tax positions for prior years

   

Lapse in statute of limitations

  (217

)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, December 31, 2017

  12,889 

Increases in tax positions for current year

  664 

Increases in tax positions for prior years

   

Lapse in statute of limitations

  (261)

Gross unrecognized tax benefits, December 31, 2018

 $13,292 

We do not provide deferred taxes on undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries as we intend to indefinitely reinvest those earnings.

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets is summarized:summarized (in thousands):

  

Balance at Beginning of Period

  

Charged to Costs and Expenses

  

Deductions/ Write-offs of Accounts

  

Balance at End of Period

 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

                

2020

 $10,486  $31,373  $0  $41,859 

2019

 $9,808  $678  $0  $10,486 

 

  

Balance at

Beginning

of Period

  

Charged

to Costs

and

Expenses

  

Deductions/

Write-offs

of Accounts

  

Balance

at End

of Period

 

Valuation allowance for deferred tax assets

                

2018

 $9,126  $682  $  $9,808 

2017

 $6,798  $2,328  $  $9,126 

2016

 $6,205  $593  $  $6,798 

 

 

1013.  NET INCOME (LOSS)LOSS PER SHARE

 

Basic net income (loss)loss per share is computed by dividing net incomeloss by weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period (excluding outstanding stock options and shares subject to repurchase). Diluted net incomeloss per share is computed using the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period plus the potential effect of dilutive securities which are convertible into common shares (using the treasury stock method), except in cases in which the effect would be anti-dilutive. The following is a reconciliation of the numerators and denominators used in computing basic and diluted net income (loss)loss per share (in thousands except per share amount):

  

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2020

  

2019

 

Numerator:

                 

Net income (loss)

 $(7,716) $(1,337) $9,103 

Net loss

 $(40,363) $(5,418)

Denominator:

                 

Basic weighted-average shares outstanding

  32,169   32,038   31,373  34,458  32,411 

Effect of dilutive options and restricted stock

        1,058 

Effect of dilutive options and restricted stock units

  0   0 

Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding

  32,169   32,038   32,431   34,458   32,411 
             

Net income (loss) per share – Basic

 $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.29 

Net income (loss) per share – Diluted

 $(0.24) $(0.04) $0.28 

Net loss per share – Basic

 $(1.17) $(0.17)

Net loss per share – Diluted

 $(1.17) $(0.17)

 

For the years ended December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017,2019, because the Company was in a loss position, basic net loss per share is the same as diluted net loss per share as the inclusion of the potential common shares would have been anti-dilutive.

 

The following table sets forth potential shares of common stock that are not included in the diluted net income (loss)loss per share calculation above because to do so would be anti-dilutive for the periods indicated (in thousands):

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Outstanding options

  332   538 

Nonvested shares of restricted stock units

  921   915 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

  160   141 

Total

  1,413   1,594 

 

  

Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

 

Outstanding options

  669   751   134 

Nonvested shares of restricted stock units

  1,060   411   18 

Employee Stock Purchase Plan

  237   214   121 

Total

  1,966   1,376   273 

1114.  CUSTOMER AND GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION

 

Operating segments are defined as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker, or group, in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

 

The Company’s chief operating decision maker, the chief executive officer, reviews discrete financial information presented on a consolidated basis for purposes of regularly making operating decisions, allocation of resources, and assessing financial performance. Accordingly, the Company considers itself to be in one operating and reporting segment, specifically the licensingprovision of services for differentiated data and implementation of yield improvementanalytics solutions for integrated circuit manufacturers.to the semiconductor and electronics industries.

 

The Company had revenues from individual customers in excess of 10% of total revenues as follows:

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Customer

 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2020

  

2019

 

A

  37

%

  40

%

  41

%

 23% 31%

B

  *   *

%

  11

%

 


* represents less than 10%

 

 

The Company had gross accounts receivable balances (including amounts that are unbilled) from individual customers in excess of 10% of the gross accounts receivable balance as follows:

 

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

Customer

 

2018

  

2017

  

2020

  

2019

 

A

  35

%

  41

%

 16% 27%
B *% 14%

C

  21

%

  15

%

 11% 12%

__________________________

* represents less than 10%

 

Revenues from customers by geographic area based on the location of the customers’ work sites are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2020

  

2019

 
 

Revenues

  

Percentage

of

Revenues

  

Revenues

  

Percentage

of

Revenues

  

Revenues

  

Percentage

of

Revenues

  

Revenues

  

Percentage of Revenues

  

Revenues

  

Percentage of Revenues

 

United States

 $34,179   40

%

 $39,631   39

%

 $38,748   36

%

 $36,723  42% $36,169  42%

China

  17,465   20   17,872   18   11,436   11  13,776  16  13,960  16 

Taiwan

  7,890   9   12,494   12   15,216   14  8,038  9  8,574  10 

Germany

  5,324   6   9,990   10   17,253   16 

Rest of the world

  20,936   25   21,884   21   24,808   23   29,509   33   26,882   32 

Total revenue

 $85,794   100

%

 $101,871   100

%

 $107,461   100

%

 $88,046   100% $85,585   100%

 

Long-lived assets, net by geographic area is as follows (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
 

2018

  

2017

   2020   2019 

United States

 $35,173  $24,883  $43,663  $46,000 

Rest of the world

  508   503   2,251   2,407 

Total long-lived assets, net

 $35,681  $25,386  $45,914  $48,407 

 

 

125. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

 

Fair value is the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The multiple assumptions used to value financial instruments are referred to as inputs, and a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value is established, that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs reflect assumptions market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability based on market data obtained from independent sources while unobservable inputs reflect a reporting entity’s pricing based upon its own market assumptions. These inputs are ranked according to a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels.

 

Level 1 -

Inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

 

Level 2 -

Inputs are quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in an active market, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable and market-corroborated inputs which are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3 -

Inputs are derived from valuation techniques in which one or more significant inputs or more significant inputs or value drivers are unobservable.

 

The following table represents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2020 and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

Assets

 

Total

  Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)  Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)  Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
Cash equivalents                

Money market mutual funds

 $18,012  $18,012  $0  $0 
Short-term investments (available-for-sale debt securities)                
U.S. Treasury bills (1)  114,981   114,981   0   0 
Total $132,993  $132,993  $0  $0 

__________________________

(1)  

The carrying amount of the Company’s investments in U.S. Treasury bills approximate fair value due to their short-term maturities, and there have been no events or changes in circumstances that would have had a significant effect on the fair value of these securities at December 31, 2020.

 

The following table represents the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018,2019 and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

 

Assets

 

Total

  

Quoted

Prices in

Active

Markets

for

Identical

Assets

(Level 1)

  

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

  

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

  

Total

  

Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)

  Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)  Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) 
Cash equivalents         

Money market mutual funds

 $27,068  $27,068  $  $  $27,644  $27,644  $0  $0 

 

The following table represents

From time to time, the Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2017 and the basis for that measurement (in thousands):

Assets

 

Total

  

Quoted

Prices in

Active

Markets

for

Identical

Assets

(Level 1)

  

Significant

Other

Observable

Inputs

(Level 2)

  

Significant

Unobservable

Inputs

(Level 3)

 

Money market mutual funds

 $26,638  $26,638  $  $ 

The Company enters into foreign currency forward contracts to reduce the exposure to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations on certain foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities, primarily on third-partythird-party accounts payables and intercompany balances. The primary objective of the Company’s hedging program is to reduce volatility of earnings related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. The counterparty to these foreign currency forward contracts is a large global financial institution that the Company believes is creditworthy, and therefore, the Company believes the credit risk of counterparty nonperformance is not significant. These foreign currency forward contracts are not designated for hedge accounting treatment. Therefore, the change in fair value of these contracts is recorded into earnings as a component of other income (expense)expense (income), net, and offsets the change in fair value of the foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, which is also recorded in other income (expense)expense (income), net.net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss. For the years ended December 31, 2018, 2017, 2020 and 2016,2019, the Company recognized a realized loss of $0.7 million, a realized gain of $0.7$0.2 million and a realized loss of $0.4$0.6 million, respectively on the contracts, which is recorded in interest and other income (expense)expense (income), net in the Company’s Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss).Loss.

 

The Company carries these derivatives financial instruments on its Consolidated Balance Sheets at their fair values. The Company’s foreign currency forward contracts arewere classified as Level 2 because it is not actively traded and the valuation inputs are based on quoted prices and market observable data of similar instruments. As of December 31, 2018,2020 and 2019, the Company had oneno outstanding forward contract with a notional amount of $8.2 million and recorded $55,000 in other current liability associated with this outstanding forward contract.contracts.  

 

 

 

1316.  SELECTED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA (UNAUDITED)

 

The following is a summary of the Company’s quarterly consolidated results of operations (unaudited) for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2018 2020 and 2017. 2019

  

Year Ended December 31, 2020

 
  

Q1

  

Q2

  

Q3

  

Q4

 
  

(In thousands, except for per share amounts)

 

Total revenues

 $21,158  $21,409  $23,112  $22,367 
Costs of revenues $8,487  $8,946  $9,493  $9,839 

Net loss

 $(528) $(3,652) $(2,734) $(33,449)

Net loss per share:

                

Basic

 $(0.02) $(0.11) $(0.08) $(0.91)

Diluted

 $(0.02) $(0.11) $(0.08) $(0.91)

  

Year Ended December 31, 2019

 
  

Q1

  

Q2

  

Q3

  

Q4

 
  

(In thousands, except for per share amounts)

 

Total revenues

 $20,541  $20,568  $21,914  $22,562 

Costs of revenues

 $7,867  $7,832  $8,715  $9,059 

Net loss

 $(2,691) $(710) $(687) $(1,330)

Net loss per share:

                

Basic

 $(0.08) $(0.02) $(0.02) $(0.04)

Diluted

 $(0.08) $(0.02) $(0.02) $(0.04)

 

  

Year Ended December 31, 2018

 
  

Q1

  

Q2

  

Q3

  

Q4

 
  

(In thousands, except for per share amounts)

 

Total revenues

 $24,737  $21,119  $20,213  $19,725 

Gross profit

 $13,255  $10,202  $9,530  $10,004 

Net loss

 $(424) $(2,096) $(2,082) $(3,114)

Net loss per share:

                

Basic

 $(0.01) $(0.07) $(0.06) $(0.10)

Diluted

 $(0.01) $(0.07) $(0.06) $(0.10)

  

Year Ended December 31, 2017

 
  

Q1

  

Q2

  

Q3

  

Q4

 
  

(In thousands, except for per share amounts)

 

Total revenues

 $24,289  $24,289  $26,517  $26,776 

Gross profit

 $12,858  $12,910  $14,086  $14,495 

Net income (loss)

 $517  $189  $590  $(2,634)

Net income (loss) per share:

                

Basic

 $0.02  $0.01  $0.02  $(0.08)

Diluted

 $0.02  $0.01  $0.02  $(0.08)

 

 

Item 9.   Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting andFinancial Disclosure

 

The required disclosure related to our previous change in independent registered public accounting firm can be found in our Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on September 18, 2018.None. 

  

Item 9A.   Controls and Procedures

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our "disclosure“disclosure controls and procedures"procedures” as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) as of December 31, 2018,2020, in connection with the filing of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, as of December 31, 2018,2020, our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and is accumulated and communicated to our management as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosuredisclosure. 

  

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, for the Company. Our management, with the participation of our principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer, assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting (ICFR) as of December 31, 2018.2020. This evaluation was based on the framework established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO"(“COSO”). Based on our assessment under the COSO framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2018.2020.  Management has excluded the ICFR of Cimetrix Incorporated (“Cimetrix”), which we acquired on December 1, 2020 as discussed in Note 4 “Business Combination” to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.  Total revenues subject to Cimetrix’s ICFR represented 1% of our consolidated total revenues for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.  Total assets subject to Cimetrix’s ICFR represented 14% of our consolidated total assets as of December 31, 2020 (of which $33.1 million, or 12% of our consolidated total assets, represents intangible assets and goodwill subject to our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020).

 

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018,2020, excluding Cimetrix, has been audited by BPM LLP, the Company's independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. 

 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting 

 

There were no changes in internal control over financial reporting during the fourth quarter ended December 31, 2018,2020, which has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting. 

 

Item 9B.   Other Information.

 

None. 

    

 

PART III

 

Pursuant to Paragraph (3) of the General Instructions to Form 10-K, certain of the information required by Part III of this Form 10-K is incorporated by reference from our Proxy Statement as set forth below. The Proxy Statement is expected to be filed within 120 days of December 31, 2018.2020.  

 

Item 10.   Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance.

 

Information with respect to our directors and our Audit Committee appears in our Proxy Statement under “Proposal No. 1 — Election of Directors — Nominees for the Board of Directors” and is incorporated herein by reference. Information with respect to our executive officers appears in Part I, Item 1 — “Executive“Information about our Executive Officers” of this Form 10-K.

   

Information with respectWith regard to the information required by this item regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act, appearswe will provide disclosure of delinquent Section 16(a) reports, if any, in our Proxy Statement, under “Section 16 Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” and such disclosure, if any, is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Our Board of Directors has adopted a Code of Ethics (“Code of Ethics”), which is applicable to all employees of the Company, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial and accounting officer and employees of the Company.officer. Our Code of Ethics is available on our website at www.pdf.com, on the investor relations page. The Company'sCompany’s website address provided is not intended to function as a hyperlink, and the information on the Company'sCompany’s website is not, and should not be considered, part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is not incorporated by reference herein.  You may also request a copy of our Code of Ethics in writing by sending your request to PDF Solutions, Inc., Attention: Investor Relations, 2858 De La Cruz Blvd., Santa Clara, California 95050. If we make any substantive amendments to theour Code of Ethics or grant any waiver, including any implicit waiver, from a provision of the Code of Ethics to our Chief Executive Officer or Chief Financial Officer, we will disclose the nature of such amendment or waiver on our website or in a current report on Form 8-K.

 

Item 11.   Executive Compensation.

 

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Compensation of Executive Officers and Other Matters — Executive Compensation” in our Proxy Statement.

 

Item 12.   Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Managementand Related Stockholder Matters.

 

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management” in our Proxy Statement. Also incorporated by reference is the information in the table under the heading "Equity“Equity Compensation Plan Information"Information” in our Proxy Statement.

 

Item 13.   Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence.

 

The information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section entitled “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions and Directors Independence” in our Proxy Statement.

 

Item 14.   Principal Accountant Fees and Services.

 

Information with respect to Principal Accountant Fees and Services is incorporated by reference to “Proposal No. 2: Ratification of Appointment of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in our Proxy Statement.

   

 

PART IV

 

Item 15.   Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(a)

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1)

The following documents are filed as part of this report:

(1) Consolidated Financial Statements and Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firms

 

The following documents are included as Part II, Item 8 of this Form 10-K:

 

 

Page

 

 

Reports of BPM LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

3743

Report of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

39

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 20182020 and 20172019

4046

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Income (Loss)Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172020 and 20162019

4147

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172020 and 20162019

4248

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2018, 20172020 and 20162019

4349

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

4451

  

 

(2)

(2) Financial Statement Schedules

 

All financial statement schedules have been omitted, since the required information is not applicable or is not present in amounts sufficient to require submission of the schedule, or because the information required is included in the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in this Form 10-K.

 

(3)

(3) Exhibits required by Item 601 of Regulation S-K

 

See Item 15(b) below.

 

(b)

(b)Exhibits

Exhibits

  

INDEX TO EXHIBITS

 

Exhibit

Number

 

Description

1.01

Board of Directors Acceleration Agreement (incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed November 23, 2005)*

3.01

Third Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of PDF Solutions, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1/A filed July 9, 2001)

3.02

Amended and Restated Bylaws of PDF Solutions, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 8-K filed January 28,May 1, 2019)

3.02

Amended and Restated Bylaws of PDF Solutions, Inc. (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2005)

4.01

Specimen Stock Certificate (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed September 6, 2001)

4.02Stockholder Agreement by and between PDF Solutions, Inc. and Advantest America, Inc. dated July 29, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2020

10.01

Form of Indemnification Agreement between PDF Solutions, Inc. and certain of its executive officers and directors (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 filed August 7, 2000)

10.02

Form of Indemnification Agreement between PDF Solutions, Inc. and certain of its senior executive officers and directors (incorporated herein by reference to the registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 16, 2009)*

10.03

PDF Solutions, Inc. 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 10, 2007) and related agreements (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed August 9, 2011)*

10.04

PDF Solutions, Inc. 2001 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s proxy statement dated April 6, 2010)*

 

 

10.05Exhibit

Number

IDS Software, Inc. 2001 Stock Option/Stock Issuance Plan and related agreements (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 filed October 17, 2003)*

Description

10.0610.04

PDF Solutions Inc. FourthSix Amended and Restated 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to the registrant’s proxy statement dated April 14, 2017)May 8, 2020)*

10.0710.05

Form of Stock Option Agreement (Non-statutory) under PDF Solutions, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2012)*

10.0810.06

Form of Stock Unit Agreement under PDF Solutions, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2012)*

10.0910.07

Form of Stock Appreciation Right Agreement under PDF Solutions, Inc. 2011 Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s filing on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2012)*

10.1010.08

Employment confirmation to John Kibarian from PDF Solutions, Inc. dated October 13, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2012)*

10.1110.09

Employment confirmation to Kimon Michaels from PDF Solutions, Inc. dated October 13, 2009 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant's Annual Report on Form 10-K filed March 15, 2012)*

10.12

10.10
 

Offer LetterEmployment offer to Gregory Walker from PDF Solutions, Inc.Adnan Raza, dated November 1, 2011 (incorporated herein by reference to registrar’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2011)*January 23, 2020

10.13

Offer letter to Cornelius D. Hartgring from PDF Solutions, Inc. dated August 29, 2002 (incorporated(incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Annual Reportfiling on Form 10-K filed on March 26, 2003)10, 2020)*

10.14

10.11
 

Carmel Corporate Plaza Office LeaseSoftware License and Related Services Agreement by and between PDF Solutions, Inc. and 15015 Avenue of Science Associates LLCAdvantest America, Inc. dated as of April 1, 2003March 25, 2020 and Amendment No.1 thereto dated July 29, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed May 14, 2003)November 6, 2020)+

10.15 

10.12
 

EmploymentAmended and Restated Master Development Agreement by and between PDF Solutions, Inc. and Advantest America, Inc. dated February 26, 2016, with Kwang-Hyun KimJuly 29, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s CurrentQuarterly Report on Form 8-K,10-Q filed March 3, 2016)*November 6, 2020)+

10.1610.13 Employment offer to Christine A. Russell,Master Commercial Terms and Support Services Agreement by and between PDF Solutions, Inc. and Advantest America, Inc. dated July 31, 201829, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s filingQuarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 6, 2020)+
10.14Securities Purchase Agreement by and between PDF Solutions, Inc. and Advantest America, Inc. dated July 29, 2020 (incorporated herein by reference to registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed November 9, 2018)*6, 2020)+.

21.01

Subsidiaries of Registrant †

23.01

Consent of BPM LLP, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm†

23.02

Consent of PricewaterhouseCoopers, Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm†

31.01

Certifications of the principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†

31.02

Certifications of the principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002†

32.01

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

32.02

Certification pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002**

101.INS101

XBRL Instance Document†

The following financial statements from the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020, formatted in Inline XBRL: (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text and including detailed tags.

101.SCH104

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document†

101.CAL

Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document†

and contained in Exhibit 101)

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document†

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document†

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document†

 

 


 *

Indicates management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

Filed herewith.

 **

Furnished, and not filed.

+Certain portions of this document that constitute confidential information have been redacted in accordance with Regulation S-K, Item 601(b)(10).

 

Item 16.   Form 10-K Summary

 

Not applicable. 

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

  

PDF SOLUTIONS, INC.

  

By:

/s/  John K. Kibarian 

John K. Kibarian

President and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal executive officer)

  

  

  

  

  

By:

/s/  John K. Kibarian Adnan Raza

  

  

  

John K. KibarianAdnan Raza

  

  

  

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief ExecutiveFinancial Officer

  

  

  

(Principal executive officer)

By:

/s/  Christine A. Russell

Christine A. Russell

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal financial and accounting officer)

  

 

Date March 7, 201911, 2021

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Date

 

Signature

 

Title

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

/s/ JOHN K. KIBARIAN

 

Director, President and Chief Executive Officer

 

  

 

John K. Kibarian

 

(Principal executive officer)

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

/s/ CHRISTINE A. RUSSELLADNAN RAZA

 

Executive Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer

 

  

 

Christine A. RussellAdnan Raza

 

(Principal financial and accounting officer)

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

/s/ JOSEPH R. BRONSON

 

Lead Independent Director

 

  

 

Joseph R. Bronson

 

 

 

  

 

 

 

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

/s/ NANCY ERBA

Director

Nancy Erba

March 11, 2021

/s/ MICHAEL B. GUSTAFSON

Director

Michael Gustafson

March 11, 2021

s/ MARCO IANSITI

 

Director

 

 

 

Marco Iansiti

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

/s/ KIMON MICHAELS

 

Director

 

 

 

Kimon Michaels

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

s/ GeraldGERALD Z. YinYIN  

 

Director 

 

 

 

Gerald Z. Yin

 

 

March 4, 201911, 2021

 

s/ Michael B. GustafsonSHUO ZHANG

Director 

 

 

 

Michael GustafsonShuo Zhang

 

 

72

81