Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.20549

 

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 20192022

 

OR

 

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from                     to                  

 

Commission file number 001-33678

 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Delaware

68-0454536

(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or

organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

 

2000 Powell Street, Suite 1150, Emeryville, California 94608

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip(Zip Code)

 

Registrant’sRegistrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (510) 899-8800

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Title of Each Class

Trading Symbol(s)

Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share

NBY

NBY

NYSE American

 

Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None.

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒    No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes ☒    No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer 

Accelerated filer 

Emerging growth company

Non-accelerated filer 

Smaller reporting company 

 


 

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☐

If securities are registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act, indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes ☐ No ☒

 

As of June 30, 2019,2022, the aggregate market value of the voting stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant, computed by reference to the last sale price of such stock as of such date on the NYSE American, was approximately $15,627,956.$10,875,498. This figure excludes an aggregate of 11,485,433286,039 shares of common stock held by affiliates, including officers and directors, as of June 30, 2019.2022 (as adjusted for the registrant’s 1-for-35 reverse stock split, effective November 15, 2022). Exclusion of shares held by any of these persons should not be construed to indicate that such person possesses the power, direct or indirect, to direct or cause the direction of the management or policies of the registrant, or that such person is controlled by or under common control with the registrant.

 

As of March 24, 2020,27, 2023, there were 28,010,5642,035,444 shares of the registrant'sregistrant’s common stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

None.Certain information not otherwise provided herein that is required by Part III of this Form 10-K will be incorporated by reference from the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement for its 2023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed within 120 days after the end of the Registrant’s year ended December 31, 2022.

 


 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

ANNUAL REPORT ON FORM10-K

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 20192022

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

1

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

7

8

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

20

18

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

20

18

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

20

19

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

20

19

PART II

PART II

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

20

ITEM 6.

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA[RESERVED]

22

20

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

23

20

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

32

27

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

32

28

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

73

68

ITEM 9A9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

73

68

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

73

68

ITEM 9C.

DISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

68

PART III

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

73

69

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

73

69

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

73

75

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

74

75

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

74

75

PART IV

PART IV

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

74

76

 

Unless the context requires otherwise, all references in this report to "we," "our," "us,"“we,” “our,” “us,” the "Company"“Company” and "NovaBay"“NovaBay” refer to NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Further, all references to "we," "us," "our," "the Company," or "NovaBay" herein refer to the California corporation prior to the date of the Reincorporation (as defined below) and to the, a Delaware corporation, on and after the date of the Reincorporation.its wholly-owned subsidiary, DERMAdoctor, LLC, a Missouri limited liability company.

 

NovaBay®The Company owns over 40 live trademark registrations in the U.S., as well as trademark registrations and pending applications in many other countries internationally, with our primary trademarks including “Avenova®”, “CelleRx®”, “PhaseOne®”, “NeutroPhase®”, “DERMAdoctor®”, “Kakadu C®”, “AIN’T Misbehavin’®”, “KP Duty®” and depictions of Dr. Audrey Kunin, some of which are held directly by NovaBay Pharma®, Avenova®, NeutroPhase®, CelleRx®, AgaNase®, Aganocide®, AgaDerm®, Neutroxand Going Beyond Antibiotics® are trademarks of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. All other trademarks and trade names are the property of their respective owners.others by our wholly-owned subsidiary DERMAdoctor.

 

On December 18, 2015,November 15, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-251-for-35 reverse stock split of its common stock.stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”). The accompanying financial statements and related notes give retroactive effect to this reverse stock split.

 


 

 

SPECIAL NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

 

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that are based on our management's current beliefs, expectations and assumptions and on information currently available to our management. These forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements regarding additional capital needed to finance our operations, uncertainty regarding our ability to continue as a going concern, our product candidates, market opportunities, competitions,competitors, business plan and strategies, anticipated trends and challenges in our business and the markets in which we operate, and anticipated expenses and capital requirements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "anticipates," "believes," "could," "estimates," "expects," "intends," " “anticipates,believes,could,estimates,expects,intends,may,," "plans," "potential," "predicts," "projects," "should," "will," "would"potential,predicts,projects,should,will,would and similar expressions intended to identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, performances or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements. We discuss many of these risks in greater detail under the heading "Risk Factors"Risk Factors in Item 1A of this report, and in cautionary language contained elsewhere in this report. Given these risks and uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.statements in this report. You should read this report and the documents that we reference and have filed as exhibits thoroughly and with the understanding that our actual future results maybe materially different from what we expect. Also, forward-looking statements represent our management'smanagements beliefs, expectations and assumptions only as of the date of this report.report and our actual future results maybe materially different from what we expect. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update these forward-looking statements publicly or to updateafter the reasons actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements,date of this report, even if new information becomes available in the future.

 

PART I

ITEM 1.

BUSINESS

 

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. is a medical device company predominately focused on eye care. For the past four years, we have been focused primarily on commercializing Avenova®, an FDA cleared product sold in the United States for cleansingdevelops and removing foreign material including microorganismssells scientifically-created and debris from skin around the eye, including the eyelid.clinically-proven eyecare, skincare and wound care products.

 

Our leading product, Avenova® Antimicrobial Lid and Lash Solution (“Avenova Spray”), is formulated with our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid. Avenova has proven in laboratory testing to have broad antimicrobial properties as a preservative in solution as it removes foreign material including microorganisms and debris from the skin around the eye, including the eyelid.

In the first quarter of 2019, our gross and net revenue and profit margins were adversely affected when many national insurance payors stopped reimbursing customers for their purchase of Avenova. Despite consistent demand for Avenova we were challenged by the costs of maintaining an expanded commercial organizationSpray is formulated with our new lower net selling price. In the first quarter of 2019, we made a strategic shift by significantly reducing the number of field sales representatives by about three-quarters and redeploying our remaining representatives in territories that account for about 95% of retail pharmacy sales. This shift allowed us to effectively utilize our streamlined commercial resources to reach higher-prescribing physicians while significantly reducing our operating expenses.

Going forward, our core business strategy is centered around increasing sales of Avenova in all distribution channels: (1) Avenova Direct, our direct-to-consumer model, allowing customers to forego time-consuming doctor visits and trips to the pharmacy; (2) Retail Pharmacies, selling to consumers through local pharmacies across 50 states; (3) our Partner Pharmacy Program, providing a consistent patient experience at contracted pricing; and (4) our Buy-and-Sell channel, allowing patients to buy Avenova during their office visits to their preferred eye care specialist.

Beyond Avenova, we have developed additional products containing our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid and is cleared by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) for sale in the United States. Avenova Spray is available direct to consumers primarily through online distribution channels and is also available by prescription and dispensed by eyecare professionals for blepharitis and dry-eye disease. Other eyecare products offered under the Avenova eyecare brand include Novawipes by Avenova, Avenova Lubricant Eye Drops, Avenova Moist Heating Eye Compress, and the i-Chek eyelid and eyelash mirror by Avenova.

Through our subsidiary DERMAdoctor, LLC (“DERMAdoctor”), we offer over 30 dermatologist-developed products targeting common skin concerns, ranging from aging and blemishes to dry skin, perspiration and keratosis pilaris. DERMAdoctor branded products are marketed and sold through the DERMAdoctor website, well-known traditional and digital beauty retailers, and a network of international distributors. We acquired DERMAdoctor in November 2021 (the “DERMAdoctor Acquisition”), and since completing this transaction we have been working to integrate and expand the DERMAdoctor business in order to achieve strategic objectives contemplated by the acquisition, including NeutroPhase®revenue growth, cost reductions and overall profitability. We were not able to achieve these objectives in fiscal 2022, as DERMAdoctor’s product revenue declined in 2022 compared tour expectations, while operating costs relating to these products increased. We continue to work to achieve these objectives, as well as continuing to evaluate additional strategies for our Company and its business to address our capital and liquidity needs as discussed in this Item 1 below under “Our Capital Requirements and Strategic Initiatives”.

We also manufacture and sell our proprietary form of hypochlorous acid for the wound care market and CelleRx® for the dermatology market. For NeutroPhase, we have established a U.S. distribution partner and an international distribution partner in China. For CelleRx, we began selling directly to the consumer on November 1, 2019 through CelleRx.com, a low-cost online distribution channel leveraging much of the same infrastructure already in place for Avenova Direct. Avenova,our NeutroPhase and CelleRxPhaseOne branded products. NeutroPhase and PhaseOne are medical devices cleared by the FDA under the Foodused for cleansing and Drug Administration Act Section 510(k).irrigation as part of surgical procedures, as well as treating certain wounds, burns, ulcers and other injuries. We currently sell these products through distributors.

1

Our Products and Marketing Approach

 

Avenova Branded Eyecare Products

 

Avenova Spray is a proprietary solution withform of hypochlorous acid that acts as an antimicrobial preservative in solution and has been shown to neutralize bacterial toxins in laboratory tests. Because it is a gentle isotonic solution, we believe that it is well suited for daily use. We believe thatuse on the lids and lashes. Avenova Spray offers distinct advantages when compared to alternative lid and lash regimens that contain soaps, bleach, and other impurities, as Avenova Spray removes unwanted microorganisms from the skin without the use of these harmful ingredients such as detergents and bleach. 

1

We currently believe ouringredients. Avenova Spray’s target market is the millions of Americans who suffer from minor irritation of the skin around the eye (commonly referred to as blepharitis) as well as anyone who suffers from dry eye (commonly described as a gritty sandy sensation while blinking). Avenova Spray is available both over-the-counter and as a prescription. We began sellingprimarily promote Avenova Spray directly to consumers on Amazon.com and Avenova.com. In total, this was our leading sales channel by unit sales and net revenue in the United States in 2014. We have distribution agreements with McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health,2022. Prescription Avenova Spray is available at optometrists’ and AmerisourceBergen Corporation that make Avenova accessible nationwide in nearly allophthalmologists’ offices, through our physician dispensed channel, and at most retail pharmacies across the United States, and we have entered into certain agreements directly with some preferred pharmacy networks. These agreements with partner pharmacies provide greater control over the patient experience at consistent contract pricing. Avenova is also marketed through numerous ophthalmology and optometry networks, including some specialty pharmacy groups that specialize in obtaining patient refills and maintaining patient compliance.all 50 states.

 

Because Avenova Direct was launched on June 1, 2019Spray can be purchased as both an over-the-counter and prescription product, it is available to U.S.a wide range of potential customers exclusively on Amazon.com. Avenova Direct is the same strength hypochlorous formulation as Avenova Rx, but comes in a smaller 20mL size and is sold without a prescription. This channel offers the Company stable gross-to-net pricing and provides customers with easy access to our product. This modeladdressable markets. Making it available over-the-counter capitalizes on a trend to sell pharmaceutical products directly to consumers in response to increased cost shifting to consumers through high-deductible health plans,plans. Avenova Spray is available on Avenova.com, Amazon.com, Walmart.com, and adds convenience by allowingselect other online channels.

Support from ophthalmologists and optometrists for Avenova Spray remains strong. Continuous endorsement of medical professionals for Avenova has created a “doctor recommended” halo effect around our brand. This is a key differentiating factor in a crowded consumer space and is a result of our high quality and reliable efficacy. Our physician dispensed channel is particularly important in this regard as it gives patients the opportunity to purchase Avenova Spray conveniently and immediately upon recommendation in the doctor’s office. We believe this also creates repeat Avenova Spray customers to forego a time-consuming doctor visitwho subsequently purchase Avenova Spray and trip to the pharmacy. We are promoting this programother Avenova branded products through complimentary social media marketing to target consumers in specific demographics, as well as to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and current and former Avenova patients.other channels.

 

We expect that ouralso make prescription business willAvenova Spray accessible nationwide in nearly all retail pharmacies across the United States through agreements with McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, and AmerisourceBergen Corporation. We continue to be an important part of total Avenova sales because the support for Avenova from the medical community is important to maintaining its reputation as a preferred product. Although we are seeking and have pursued new distribution channels such as Avenova Direct, we continue to focus the efforts of our sales staff on buildingbuild our prescription business under a value pricing model. We maintain a rebate program for electronic payment transactions and in the form of instant rebate cards. The rebate cards are intended to be used by patients who either do not have insurance coverage or whose insurance coverage does not cover Avenova Spray, thereby lowering the price for the patient at the pharmacy.

We also have agreements with select preferred pharmacy networks through our Partner Pharmacy Program. These agreements provide greater control over the patient experience at consistent contract pricing. Our partner pharmacies ensurePartner Pharmacy Program also ensures that proper insurance reimbursement occurs, and that our patients are receiving the best possible price. In 2021, we added ImprimisRx, one of the nation’s leading ophthalmology-focused pharmaceutical businesses, to our Partner Pharmacy Program.

DERMAdoctor Branded Dermatology Products

Through the DERMAdoctor Acquisition, we added a comprehensive portfolio of dermatological solutions to address common skincare concerns including: keratosis pilaris, rosacea and eczema, anti-aging, hyperhidrosis, excessive hair, and acne. These products are organized into several product families, including: (i) Kakadu C®; (ii) KP Duty®; (iii) Total Non-scents Antiperspirant; (iv) Wrinkle Revenge®; (v) AIN’T Misbehavin’®; and (vi) Calm, Cool & Corrected®. DERMAdoctor continues to develop its pipeline of additional new products to address a variety of common skin conditions.

DERMAdoctor products are offered within the large and steadily growing skincare category of the beauty industry. The skincare market is divided into facial care, hand and body care and sun care. Within the skincare market, our DERMAdoctor products sell and compete across all major product categories with a wide variety of products at various price points. Skincare products can also be subdivided into prestige and mass segments. Prestige products are characterized by higher price points and are typically sold in high-end specialty stores and department stores.

Our marketing strategy for the DERMAdoctor brand is to focus on educating our target consumers about the unique attributes of such products, developing intimate relationships with these consumers and capitalizing on our omni-channel distribution strategy to effectively reach and engage these consumers.Our target demographic for the DERMAdoctor brand encompasses women between the ages of 25 to 65 who have a college education and an above average household income.

The skincare industry is highly competitive and subject to rapid changes due to consumer preferences and industry trends. Competition in the skincare industry is generally based on the introduction of new products, pricing of products, quality of products and packaging, brand awareness, perceived value and quality, innovation, in-store presence and visibility, promotional activities, advertising, editorials, e-commerce and mobile-commerce initiatives and other activities. These products compete with a high volume of new product introductions and existing products by diverse companies across several different distribution channels, including large multinational consumer products companies that have many skincare brands under ownership, as well as standalone skincare brands, including those that may target the latest trends or specific distribution channels. We expect our DERMAdoctor products to encounter competition for consumer recognition and market share with products that have achieved significant national and international brand name recognition and consumer loyalty, such as those offered by global prestige beauty companies like Avon Products, Inc., Elizabeth Arden, Inc., The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc., L’Oréal Group, Shiseido, Coty, Mary Kay, Inc. and The Proctor & Gamble Company, each of which have skincare brands.

2

NeutroPhase and PhaseOne Branded Wound Care Products

 

We also expect to invest in systems that support prescribing physicians' efforts to educate their patients. We believe we have made it easier for doctors to get Avenova into the handsmanufacture and sell our proprietary form of patients by providing availability through well-known national pharmacy chains, partner pharmacies, directly through the practitioners' office or Avenova Direct.

Competitors for Avenova

There are many companies that sell lid and lash scrubs, most of which, to the best of our knowledge, are surfactant (soap) based. Unlike its competitors, Avenova consists solely of saline and 0.01% pure hypochlorous acid withoutfor the bleach impurities included in competitive offerings. While newer over-the-counter products have recently been commercially launched, they all include bleach or other impurities. Because Avenova lacks these impurities, we believe that physicians and their patients will choose Avenova over other competitive prescription products or over-the-counter hypochlorous acid products. While cheaper antibacterial soaps are commonly used to reduce or prevent bacterial contamination on the skin, we do not view them as effective competitors of Avenova.

CelleRx (Dermatology)

Created for cosmetic procedures, CelleRx (0.01% hypochlorous acid as a preservative in solution), an FDA-cleared medical device, is a cleansing solution intended for use after laser resurfacing, chemical peels and other cosmetic surgery procedures. We believe that CelleRx is superior to Dakin solution, which contains bleach impurities. Beginning November 1, 2019, we now sell CelleRx directly to the consumer through CelleRx.com, our online distribution channel.

NeutroPhase (Wound Care)

wound care market. Consisting of 0.03%higher concentrations of hypochlorous acid, NeutroPhase an FDA-cleared medical device, isand PhaseOne are used for the cleansing and irrigation of intraoperative pocket lavage, before subcutaneous closure, stage I to cleanseIV pressure injuries, stasis ulcers, leg ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, first-degree and remove microorganisms from any type of acute or chronicsecond-degree burns, post-surgical wounds, grafted and donor sites, minor burns, superficial abrasions, wounds, and moistening absorbent wound and can be used with any type of wound care modality.dressings.

 

Both NeutroPhase is intended to treat the millions of patients in the United States who suffer from chronic non-healing wounds, such as pressure, venous stasis and diabetic ulcers. NeutroPhase is used by some physicians as an irrigation solution as part of the adjunct treatment for Necrotizing Fasciitis ("NF").

NeutroPhase is competingPhaseOne compete in a crowded wound cleanser market with many older and lower-priced products with similar uses, such as Vashe and Betadine Surgical Scrub. However, we believe our NeutroPhase hasand PhaseOne solutions have distinct competitive advantages because they are made without the toxic chemicals found in a market where there is currently no dominant product.other products. NeutroPhase and PhaseOne are gentle, non-irritating, and non-sensitizing to skin and new tissue. PhaseOne is distributed through commercial partners in the United States, and China.

2

Aganocide® Compounds

This second product category includes auriclosene®NeutroPhase is distributed in China by Pioneer Pharma (Hong Kong) Company Ltd., (NVC-422),who is also a stockholder of our lead clinical-stage Aganocide compound, which is a patented, synthetic molecule with a broad spectrum of uses against bacteria, viruses and fungi. Our Aganocide compound is a derivative of the naturally occurring dichlorotaurine, mimicking the anti-infective chemistry and mechanism of action that human white blood cells, known as leukocytes, use against infections. Our Aganocide compound possesses a significantly reduced likelihood of bacteria or viruses developing resistance, which is critical for advanced anti-infectives. The World Health Organization has issued the international nonproprietary name ("INN") "auriclosene" or NVC-422. Each INN is a globally recognized unique name, and we believe INNs facilitate the identification of active pharmaceutical ingredients. Auriclosene is a novel chemical entity and was granted composition of matter patent protection to 2024 by the U.S. Patent Office. Although we conducted clinical trials using the Aganocide compounds from 2007 to 2015, none have received FDA approval, and we therefore cannot commercialize these compounds in the United States.Company.

 

Customers, Manufacturing and Suppliers

 

Historically, our salesforce primarily calledAvenova branded products are available on ophthalmologists, optometrists,Amazon.com, Walmart.com, CVS.com and other eye care professionals who can prescribe Avenova. ThereAvenova.com. Online sales now account for the majority of Avenova Spray revenue. Internationally, Avenova Spray is available in Australia through a distribution partner. NeutroPhase and PhaseOne sales rely solely on distribution partners in China and the U.S., respectively.

Our DERMAdoctor products are currently over 7,000 doctors prescribing Avenova in the United States. These doctors have written approximately 135,000 prescriptionssold in the United States for Avenovaand internationally (including in 2019. AlthoughChina, the number of prescribing physicians who write more than 10 scripts per month has risen dramatically, no individual doctor representedMiddle East, Europe, Canada, and Central and South America). Such products are distributed online, through wholesale distribution, in excess of 10% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019. 

Now, in additionphysical store locations and, particularly as relates to prescriptions, U.S. customers have direct access to Avenovainternational sales, through Avenova Direct. Since the consumer launch of Avenova Direct on Amazon.commarketing and Avenova.com on June 1, 2019, this distribution channel has generated $1.0 million in revenue.  During the second half of the year Avenova Direct accounted for 28% of all Avenova revenue and 43% of all Avenova units sold across all channels.  Similarly, CelleRx is distributed to customers through an online channel, CelleRx.com, while NeutroPhase relies on distributionagreements with local partners.

 

WeFor the Avenova Spray, we currently outsource manufacturing of Avenova, CelleRx and NeutroPhase to twoa contract manufacturersmanufacturer with facilities located in the United States. For our DERMAdoctor products, we also use third-party contract manufacturers and suppliers to obtain substantially all raw materials, components, and packaging products and to manufacture finished products relating to the DERMAdoctor brand. We utilize several different product fillers and numerous ingredient and packaging suppliers from which we source and contract the manufactures of our DERMAdoctor products.

We believe that we have good relationships with our contractmanufacturers and that our manufacturers have adequate manufacturing capacity to satisfy our demands and additional contractfor all products. Further, we believe that there are often alternative sources available in the event that one or more of these manufacturers are also available should theynot available. However, the products manufactured by alternative manufacturers may not be required.

All raw materials and other supplies utilized inidentical to our current products as some of our product formulations, particularly as relates to our DERMAdoctor products, are sometimes owned by that particular manufacturer. We continually review our manufacturing needs against the manufacturing processcapacity of our contract manufacturers to ensure that we are available from various third-party suppliers in quantities adequateable to meet our needs.production goals, reduce costs, and operate more efficiently.

 

Intellectual Property

 

We believe patentsthat our intellectual property has substantial value and other proprietary rights are importanthas contributed significantly to the success of our business. We also rely on patents, trademarks, trade secrets and know-how to maintain our competitive position. We own over 40 live trademark registrations in the U.S., as well as trademark registrations and pending applications in many other countries internationally, with our primary trademarks including “Avenova®”, “CelleRx®”, “PhaseOne®”, “NeutroPhase®”, “DERMAdoctor®”, “Kakadu C®”, “AIN’T Misbehavin’®”, “KP Duty®” and depictions of Dr. Audrey Kunin, some of which are held directly by NovaBay and others by our wholly-owned subsidiary DERMAdoctor.

We seek to protect our intellectual property rights by a variety of means, including obtaining patents, maintaining trade secrets and proprietary know-how and technological innovation to operate, without infringing on the proprietary rights of others and to prevent others from infringing on our proprietary rights. In order to maintain our trade secrets, we have entered intorely on and use reasonable business activities to protect trade secrets, such as confidentiality/invention rights agreements with all our employees, and confidentiality agreements with our contract manufacturers.

As of December 31, 2019, wemanufacturers, proprietary expertise and product formulations, continuing innovation efforts and techniques, and other know-how to develop and maintain many worldwide patents. Our issued patents are within two patent families: Neutrox hypochlorous acid and Aganocide compounds. The Neutrox hypochlorous acid patents underlay our Avenova products, which is our primary business, as well as CelleRx and NeutroPhase. Within our Neutrox hypochlorous acid patent family, we own two issued U.S. patents and eight issued foreign patents. The Aganocide compound patent family underlay products that are still in clinical stages, which we are not currently developing as we are instead focused almost exclusively on Avenova. Within our Aganocide compound patent family, we own eight issued U.S. patents.a competitive position.

 

Research and Development

 

DERMAdoctor focuses a significant portion of its product development efforts on creating new products and improving existing products based on feedback and suggestions from its consumers. Many of these suggestions are the catalyst for new DERMAdoctor product development, as well as product extensions. DERMAdoctor’s testing activities are performed by laboratories with ISO 17025 accreditation and FDA registration. The finished products DERMAdoctor develops, including packaging, must meet adequate quality control, and performance tests before they are marketed. For the years ended December 31,2019 2022 and 2018,2021, we incurred total research and development expenses of approximately $0.2$174 thousand and $44 thousand, respectively.

3

Seasonality

Avenova Branded Products

Consistent with our peers in the United States pharmaceutical industry, prescriptions for Avenova Spray experience seasonality with the first quarter of each year typically being the lowest revenue quarter. This annual phenomenon is due to consumers facing the need to satisfy health insurance deductibles and changes to copays as each new insurance year begins. Sales of Avenova Spray through non-prescription channels, along with the other Avenova branded products, experience less seasonality with demands, with more consistent sales throughout the year.

Dermatology/Skincare Products

Our DERMAdoctor products are sold through wholesale distribution relationships with third parties such as Costco and others; therefore, we may receive periodic large orders that result in large chunks of revenue that are received in irregular intervals during the year. Historically, sales of DERMAdoctor products that contain sunscreen and antiperspirants are higher in the summer seasons and sales of DERMAdoctor products that contain moisturizers are higher in the fall and winter months.

Our Capital Requirements and Strategic Initiatives

In our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) on August 11, 2022 and November 14, 2022, and this annual report on Form 10-K, we reported that based primarily on the funds available as of June 30, 2022, September 30, 2022 and December 31, 2022, respectively, that we expected our expenses will continue to exceed our revenues, as the Company continues to invest in both its Avenova and DERMAdoctor commercialization efforts. Further, based on the amount of capital and liquidity that we had available at such time, we determined that our planned operations raised substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Additionally, we noted that changing circumstances may cause us to expend cash significantly faster than currently anticipated or planned, and that we may need to spend more cash than expected because of circumstances beyond our control that impact the broader economy such as periods of inflation, supply chain issues, the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and international conflicts (e.g., the conflict between Russia and Ukraine).

To help address our need for liquidity and capital to fund our planned operations, we entered into two financing transactions on September 9, 2022, which resulted in our Company raising approximately $5.3 million of gross proceeds, as summarized below. In connection with these transactions, we completed a 1-for-35 reverse stock split of our common stock that was effective on November 15, 2022 (the “Reverse Stock Split”).

2022 Financing Transactions

On September 9, 2022, we entered into certain letter agreements and $0.3completed a warrant reprice transaction (the “2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction”) with each holder of the common stock purchase warrants (the “November 2021 Warrants”) that we issued in our November 2021 private placement (the “2021 Private Placement”) and with certain holders of the common stock purchase warrants that we issued in a private placement that was part of a warrant reprice transaction in July 2020 (the “July 2020 Warrants”) (the “Warrant Reprice Transaction”). The 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $2.1 million. Pursuant to the terms of the letter agreements, the November 2021 Warrants (“Amended November 2021 Warrants”) and the July 2020 Warrants (“Amended July 2020 Warrants”) were amended to: (i) reduce the exercise price; (ii) provide that such warrants would not be exercisable until a later date, March 9, 2023; and (iii) in the case of the November 2021 Warrants, extend the termination date to September 11, 2028. Additionally, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, we issued to certain participants in the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction that exercised their Amended November 2021 Warrants and their Amended July 2020 Warrants, new common stock purchase warrants (the “September 2022 Warrants”) to purchase a number of shares of common stock equal to 100% of the number of shares that a participant exercised under its November 2021 Warrant or Amended July 2020 Warrant. The September 2022 Warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of 327,860 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share and expire on September 11, 2028. 

Concurrent with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, we entered into a private placement transaction with accredited investors (the “2022 Private Placement”) to sell, pursuant to the Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 9, 2022 (the “2022 Securities Purchase Agreement”), units consisting of (i) 3,250 shares of Series C Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock, par value $0.01 per share (“Series C Preferred Stock”), convertible into an aggregate of 516,750 shares of common stock, (ii) a short-term Series A-1 warrant to purchase common stock (“Short-Term Warrants”), which are exercisable for 515,876 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share for a period of eighteen (18) months after the date of issuance and (iii) a long-term Series A-2 warrant to purchase common stock (“Long-Term Warrants” and, together with the Short-Term Warrants, the “2022 Warrants”), which are exercisable for 515,876 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share for a period of six (6) years after the date of issuance. On November 18, 2022, we closed the 2022 Private Placement and received gross proceeds of $3.2 million respectively. Pursuantfrom the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock and the 2022 Warrants.

4

Ongoing Strategic Initiatives

While the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction and the 2022 Private Placement provided needed capital for the continuing operation of our business, additional funding or substantial revenue growth will be needed in both the short- and long-term in order to continue the operation of our business according to our existing business plan. In addition to strategies to grow our revenue in fiscal year 2023 and improve liquidity, we are taking steps to reduce our operating expenses, including through streamlining operations and reducing or eliminating excess costs. Further, we are continuing to evaluate our current business plan and potential changes to our business strategy focusing our resources on growing the commercial sales of Avenova and maintaining expense, we are currently not conducting any substantive research and development. Any substantial research and development costs incurred in the future would likely be related to our urology program, whichstrategic direction. If we do not expectraise additional capital or our revenues do not reach sufficient levels in the near term, then we may need to move forward at this time.implement additional cost reduction measures and make changes to our current business plan and strategic direction. Such changes may include altering our existing operations and/or pursing a strategic transaction, such as a divestiture of certain of a business or product line and related assets. We are continuing to work diligently to improve the capital, liquidity and overall financial condition of our Company.

For additional information regarding the Company’s going concern determination, plans to fund operations and ongoing strategic initiatives, see the sections captioned “Recent Developments” and “Financial Condition, Liquidity and Capital Resources” contained in Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and within Note 1, “Organization” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements contained in Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data.

 

Government Regulation

 

We are subject to extensive government regulation, principally by the FDA and state and local authorities in the United States and by comparable agencies in foreign countries. Governmental authorities in the United States extensively regulate the pre-clinical and clinical testing, safety, efficacy, research, development, manufacturing, labeling, storage, record-keeping, advertising, promotion, import, export, marketing and distribution, among other things, of pharmaceutical, and medical device and cosmetic products under various federal laws including the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act and under comparable laws by the states in the United States and in most foreign countries. We also hold our CE Mark and ISO 13485 certifications. To maintain these certifications, we undergo significant quality control audits with the relevant European authorities every year.

 

3

FDA Approval/Clearance Requirements

 

Unless an exemption applies, each medical deviceSome of our products that we wish to market in the U.S. must receiverequire FDA 510(k) clearance. It has beenclearance or approval through the Company's experience thus far that the FDA's 510(k) clearance process usually takes from four to 12 months, but can last significantly longer.OTC Drug Monograph process. We cannot be sure that 510(k) clearance will ever be obtained for any productbelieve we propose to market. We have obtained the required FDA clearance or approval for alleach of our current products, that require such clearance.if necessary.

 

The FDA decides whether a device line must undergo either the 510(k) clearance or premarket approval ("PMA"(“PMA”). PMA is the FDA process of scientific and regulatory review to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Class III medical devices. Class III medical devices are those that support or sustain human life, are of substantial importance in preventing impairment of human health, or which present a potential, unreasonable risk of illness or injury. The PMA process is based on statutory criteria. These criteria include the level of risk that the agency perceives is associated with the device and a determination of whether the product is a type of device that is similar to devices that are already legally marketed. Devices deemed to pose relatively less risk are placed in either Class I or II, which requires the manufacturer to submit a premarket notification ("PMN") requesting 510(k) clearance, unless an exemption applies. The PMN must demonstrate that the proposed device is "substantially equivalent"“substantially equivalent” in intended use and in safety and effectiveness to a legally marketed predicate device, which is a pre-existing medical device to which equivalence can be drawn, that is either in Class I, Class II, or is a Class III device that was in commercial distribution before May 28, 1976, for which the FDA has not yet called for submission of a PMA application.

 

Class I devices are those for which safety and effectiveness can be assured by adherence to the FDA's general regulatory controls for medical devices, or the "General Controls"“General Controls”, which include compliance with the applicable portions of the FDA's quality system regulations, facility registration and product listing, reporting of adverse medical events, and appropriate, truthful and non-misleading labeling, advertising, and promotional materials. Some Class I devices also require premarket clearance by the FDA through the 510(k) PMN process described below. Avenova Spray is classified as a Class I medical device.

Class II devices are subject to the FDA's General Controls, and any other special controls as deemed necessary by the FDA to ensure the safety and effectiveness of the device. Premarket review and clearance by the FDA for Class II devices is accomplished through the 510(k) PMN procedure. Pursuant to the Medical Device User Fee and Modernization Act of 2002, or MDUFMA, as of October 2002 unless a specific exemption applies, 510(k) PMN submissions are subject to user fees. Certain Class II devices are exempt from this premarket review process. intelli-Case is classified as a Class II device.

Class III devices are those devices that have a new intended use, or use advanced technology that is not substantially equivalent to that of a legally marketed device. The safety and effectiveness of Class III devices cannot be assured solely by the General Controls and the other requirements described above. These devices almost always require formal clinical studies to demonstrate safety and effectiveness and must be approved through the PMA process described below. PMA applications (and supplemental PMA applications) are subject to significantly higher user fees under MDUFMA than are 510(k) PMNs. None of our products are Class II or Class III medical devices.

A clinical trial may be required in support of All DERMAdoctor products are classified either as a 510(k) submission. These trials generally requirecosmetic or an Investigational Device Exemption, or IDE, application approved in advance by the FDA for a specified number of patients, unless the product is deemed a non-significant risk device eligible for more abbreviated IDE requirements. The IDE application must be supported by appropriate data, such as animal and laboratory testing results. Clinical trials may begin if the IDE application is approved by the FDA and the appropriate institutional review boards at the clinical trial sites.OTC monograph drug.

 

Pervasive and Continuing FDA Regulation

 

A host of regulatory requirements apply to our marketed devices, including the quality system regulation (which requires manufacturers to follow elaborate design, testing, control, documentation and other quality assurance procedures), the Medical Reporting Regulations (which require that manufacturers report to the FDA specified types of adverse events involving their products), labeling regulations, and the FDA's general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved or "off-label" uses. Class II devices also can have special controls such as performance standards, post-market surveillance, patient registries and FDA guidelines that do not apply to Class I devices. Unanticipated changes in existing regulatory requirements or adoption of new cGMPcurrent Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”) requirements could hurt our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

 

45

 

Health Care Fraud and Abuse

 

In the United States, there are federal and state anti-kickback laws that generally prohibit the payment or receipt of kickbacks, bribes or other remuneration in exchange for the referral of patients or other health-related business. For example, the federal Anti-Kickback Law (42 U.S.C. §1320a-7b(b)) prohibits anyone from, among other things, knowingly and willfully offering, paying, soliciting or receiving any bribe, kickback or other remuneration intended to induce the referral of patients for, or the purchase, order or recommendation of, health care products and services reimbursed by a federal health care program (including Medicare and Medicaid). Recognizing that the federal Anti-Kickback Law is broad and potentially applicable to many commonplace arrangements, the Office of Inspector General within the Department of Health and Human Services, or OIG, has issued regulations, known as the safe harbors, which identify permissible practices. If all of the requirements of an applicable safe harbor are met, an arrangement will not be prosecuted under this law. Safe harbors exist for a number of arrangements relevant to our business, including, among other things, payments to bona fide employees, certain discount arrangements, and certain payment arrangements involving GPOs. The failure of an arrangement to fit precisely within one or more safe harbors does not necessarily mean that it is illegal. However, conduct that does not fully satisfy each requirement of an applicable safe harbor may result in increased scrutiny by government enforcement authorities, such as the OIG or the Department of Justice. Violations of this federal law can result in significant penalties, including imprisonment, monetary fines and assessments, and exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal health care programs. Exclusion of a manufacturer would preclude any federal health care program from paying for its products. In addition to the federal Anti-Kickback Law, many states have their own kickbackanti-kickback laws. Often, these state laws closely follow the language of the federal law. Some state anti-kickback laws apply regardless of whether a federal health care program payment is involved. Federal and state anti-kickback laws may affect our sales, marketing and promotional activities, and relationships with health care providers or pharmacies by limiting the kinds of arrangements we may have with them.

 

Federal and state false claims laws prohibit anyone from presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment to third-party payors that are false or fraudulent. For example, the federal False Claims Act (31 U.S.C. §3729 et seq.) imposes liability on any person or entity who, among other things, knowingly presents, or causes to be presented, a false or fraudulent claim for payment by a federal health care program (including Medicaid and Medicare). Manufacturers, like us, can be held liable under false claims laws, even if they do not submit claims to the government, where they are found to have caused submission of false claims by, among other things, providing incorrect coding or billing advice about their products to customers that file claims, or by engaging in kickback arrangements with customers that file claims. A number of states also have false claims laws, and some of these laws may apply to claims for items or services reimbursed under Medicaid and/or commercial insurance. Sanctions under these federal and state laws may include civil monetary penalties, exclusion of a manufacturer's products from reimbursement under government programs, and imprisonment.

 

The Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 or HIPAA,(“HIPAA”), created certain criminal statutes relating to health care, including health care fraud and false statements related to healthcare matters. The health care fraud statute prohibits, among others, knowingly and willinglywillfully executing a scheme to defraud any health care benefit program, including private payors. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines, imprisonment, or exclusion from government sponsored programs. The false statements statute prohibits knowingly and willfully falsifying, concealing, or covering up a material fact or making any materially false, fictitious or fraudulent statement in connection with the delivery of, or payment for, health care benefits, items or services. A violation of this statute is a felony and may result in fines or imprisonment.

 

The federal Physician Payments Sunshine Act requires certain pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers to monitor and report certain payments and other transfers of value to physicians and other healthcare providers to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, or CMS, for disclosure to the public. Failure to submit required information may result in significant civil monetary penalties. In addition, there has been a recent trend of increased federal and state regulation of payments made to physicians for marketing, medical directorships, and other purposes. Some states mandate implementation of corporate compliance programs, along with the tracking and reporting of gifts, compensation and other remuneration to physicians, and some states limit or prohibit such gifts.

 

Due to the breadth of some of these laws, it is possible that some of our current or future practices might be challenged under one or more of these laws. In addition, there can be no assurance that we would not be required to alter one or more of our practices to be in compliance with these laws. Evolving interpretations of current laws or the adoption of new federal or state laws or regulations could adversely affect many of the arrangements we have with customers and physicians. Our risk of being found in violation of these laws is increased by the fact that some of these laws are open to a variety of interpretations. If our past or present operations are found to be in violation of any of these laws, we could be subject to civil and criminal penalties, which could hurt our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

6

Third-Party Reimbursement

Historically, many customers who were prescribed Avenova Spray relied on third-party payors, such as indemnity insurers and managed care plans, to cover and reimburse all or part of the cost. As a result, demand of Avenova Spray is partially dependent in part on the coverage and reimbursement policies of these payors. Private payors often follow the coverage and reimbursement policies of Medicare. We cannot assure you that private third-party payors will cover and reimburse Avenova Spray or any of our other products in whole or in part in the future or that payment rates will be adequate. Currently, none of our products are reimbursed by federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and we do not anticipate they will be reimbursed by such programs in the future.

Trade Regulation

Our products, particularly our DERMAdoctor products, are also subject to regulation by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) and the U.S. Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”). These laws and regulations principally relate to the ingredients, proper labeling, advertising, packaging, marketing, manufacture, safety, shipment and disposal of products.

Foreign Regulation

 

Many foreign countries in which we market or may market our products have regulatory bodies and restrictions similar to those of the FDA.FDA, CPSC and FTC. International sales are subject to foreign government regulation, the requirements of which vary substantially from country to country. The time required to obtain approval by a foreign country may be longer or shorter than that required for FDA approval and the requirements may differ.

 

5

Third-Party Reimbursement

Customers who are prescribed our product generally rely on third-party payors, such as indemnity insurers and managed care plans, to cover and reimburse all or partIn addition, we export DERMAdoctor products outside of the cost of our product. As a result, demand for ourUnited States, and those products are subject to several United States statutes and regulations that regulate exportation from the United States. These products do not require an export license so long as the product is dependent in part on the coveragenot shipped or otherwise transferred to a comprehensively embargoed country or for a potentially prohibited purpose. DERMAdoctor has developed, maintains and reimbursement policies of these payors.

Private payors often follow the coverage and reimbursement policies of Medicare. We cannot assure youfollows internal controls to ensure that private third-party payors will cover and reimburse ourit is not exporting its products in wholeto embargoed countries or in part in the future or that payment rates will be adequate. Most importantly, in 2019, we received notices from several national payors that Avenova would not be covered. Currently, none of our products are reimbursed by federal healthcare programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, and we do not anticipate they will be reimbursed by such programs in the future.

CMS, the federal agency responsible for administering the Medicare program, frequently changes product descriptors, coverage policies, product and service codes, payment methodologies and reimbursement values. Private payors often follow the coverage and reimbursement policies of Medicare. We cannot assure you that private third-party payors will cover and reimburse our products in whole or in part in the future or that payment rates will be adequate. Further, in the U.S., there have been, and we expect that there will continue to be, federal and state proposals to lower expenditures for medical products and services, which may adversely affect reimbursement for our products. prohibited purposes.

 

Other U.S. Regulation

 

We must also comply with numerous federal, state, municipal and local laws relating to matters such as environmental protection,health and safety laws and regulations relating to, among other matters, safe working conditions, manufacturing practices, healthcare reform, patient privacyproduct stewardship and information, fire hazard control and, among other things,environmental protection, including those relating to the generation, handling, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous substances.substances and waste materials, and the registration and evaluation of chemicals. We maintain policies and procedures to monitor and control environmental, health and safety risks, and to monitor compliance with applicable environmental, health and safety requirements.

 

EmployeesHuman Resources

 

As of December 31, 2019,2022, on a consolidated basis, we had a total of 2833 employees, 2629 of whom were full-time employees and 24 were part-time employees.None of our employees are represented by labor unions or covered by collective bargaining agreements. We comply with the latest employment best practices and consider our relationship with our employees to be good.

 

Facilities

 

Our principal executive office and administrative operations areis located in Emeryville, California. On August 24, 2016, we entered intoWe are party to an Office Lease (the "Lease"“Lease”), dated August 24, 2016, as subsequently amended on January 24, 2022, pursuant to which we leasedlease approximately 7,7997,675 rentable square feet of real property located on the eleventh floor (Suite 1150) at 2000 Powell Street, Emeryville, California 94608 from KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC (the "Landlord"“Landlord”), for our principal executive offices. The expiration date of the Lease is February 28, 2022,July 31, 2027, unless earlier terminated pursuant to any provision of the Lease. The Company has the option to extend the term of the Lease for one five (5)-year period upon written notice to the Landlord due no earlier than twelve (12) months and no later than nine (9) months prior to the expirationprovisions of the Lease. We believe that our office and administration facilities are suitable and adequate for our current operations and its current purpose, but we may require additional space and facilities as our business expands.

 

The Company still hasOur wholly-owned subsidiary, DERMAdoctor, is party to a lease commitmentwith Green Bay Packaging Inc., as landlord, and DERMAdoctor, as tenant, dated August 27, 2019 (the “Subsidiary Lease”), for the laboratory facilities and office space at Suite 550, EmeryStation North Building, 5980 Horton Street, Emeryville, California ("EmeryStation") under an operating lease which will expire on October 31, 2020. On July 11, 2016, the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement to sublease all 16,465 rentable19,136 square feet of real propertyspace located at EmeryStation (the "Sublease Agreement").4346 Belgium Boulevard, Building 2, Riverside, Missouri, which DERMAdoctor utilizes for light manufacturing, storage, distribution of products and administrative functions. The commencement date under the Sublease Agreement was September 8, 2016. The expiration date of the Sublease Agreement islease commenced on October 21, 2020, as amended (while the expiration date of the Company's master lease for the EmeryStation premises is October1, 2019 and expires on December 31, 2020), unless earlier terminated pursuant to the Company terminating its master lease for EmeryStation or the Sublease Agreement.2024.

 

Borrowings

On February 27, 2019, the Company issued a $1.0 million promissory note payable to Pioneer Pharma (Hong Kong) Company Ltd. (“Pioneer Hong Kong”), which was amended on June 25, 2019 (the “Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note currently bears an interest payment of $300 thousand (initially $150 thousand) and is payable in full upon the Company's next financing with Pioneer Hong Kong and in no event after July 1, 2020 (an extension per the June amendment from the initial maturity date of July 27, 2019). The transaction was facilitated by China Kington Asset Management Co. Ltd. (“China Kington”) which has a perfected security interest in all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. In connection with the Promissory Note, the Companypaid China Kington a 2% fee for brokering the transaction and has entered into a consulting agreement with China Kington for a term of one year. Bob Wu, acting in a dual role as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and as principal of China Kington, will be paid $100 thousand pursuant to such consulting agreement.

On March 26, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (the “Lender”), pursuant to which the Company issued a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”) to the Lender dated as of the Closing Date. The Convertible Note has an original principal amount of $2,215,000, bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and will mature on September 26, 2020, unless earlier paid, redeemed or converted in accordance with its terms. The Company received net proceeds of $2.0 million after deducting an original issue discount of $200 thousand and debt issuance cost of Lender’s transaction fees of $15 thousand. The Company recognized an additional $182 thousand of debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the Convertible Note.

6

The Convertible Note provides the Lender with the right to convert, at any time, all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued but unpaid interest into shares of the Company’s Common Stock at a conversion price of $1.65 per share (“Lender Conversion Price”) or the Market Price. The Market Price is defined as 85% of the lowest closing bid price during the twenty (20) Trading Days immediately preceding the applicable measurement date.

On August 8, 2019, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “August SPA”) with certain domestic investors for the sale and issuance of 4,198,566 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering and 4,198,566 warrants exercisable for 4,198,566 shares of common stock in a simultaneous private placement at an offering price of $1.00 per share. The August SPA prohibits the Company from redeeming in common stock or common stock equivalents in satisfaction of the Promissory Note with Iliad Research & Trading, L.P. and may only issue common stock in satisfaction of the Promissory Note if the stock price equals or exceeds $2.00. The Lender started redeeming $200 thousand of the Convertible Note every month since September 27, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had repaid a total of $800 thousand, $652 thousand of which was applied against the outstanding balance of the convertible note. See Note 10, “Convertible Note” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for detailed information related to the convertible note.

Available Information

 

Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Sections 13(a) and 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are available free of charge on our corporate website, located atwww.novabay.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after we electronically file such material with, or furnish it to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the "SEC").SEC. Our website is not part of this annual report on Form 10-K. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy, information statements and other information regarding issuers at http://www.sec.gov.www.sec.gov.

 

7

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

 

Our business is subject to a number of risks, the most important of which are discussed below. You should consider carefully the following risks in addition to the other information contained in this report and our other filings with the SEC before deciding to buy, sell or hold our common stock. If any of the following risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, or results of operations and the market price of our common stock could be materially adversely affected, the value of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing our Company.Company,but those that we consider to be material. Additional risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently believe are immaterial may also significantly impair our business operations.

Risks Relating to Our Liquidity

There is uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have sustained operating losses for the majority of our corporate history and expect that our 2020 expenses will exceed our 2020 revenues, as we continue to invest in our Avenova commercialization efforts. Our operating cash flow is not sufficient to support our ongoing operations, and we expect to continue incurring operating losses and negative cash flows until revenues reach a level sufficient to support ongoing growth and operations. Any additional financing that we are able to secure in the near-term may be limited and may only provide working capital sufficient into the second quarter of 2020.As such, additional funding will be needed in both the short- and long-term in order to pursue our business plan, which includes a direct-to-consumer marketing campaign for Avenova Direct, maintaining a small salesforce in the U.S. for Avenova, increasing market penetration for our existing commercial products, research and development for additional product offerings, seeking regulatory approval for these product candidates, and pursuing their commercialization in the United States, Asia, and other markets. These circumstances raise doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern, which depends on our ability to raise capital to fund our current operations.

We have a history of losses and we maynever achieve or maintain sustained profitability.

We have historically incurred net losses, and we may never achieve or maintain sustained profitability. In addition, at this time:

we have recently suffered and will continue to suffer, from a decline in product revenue due to the decrease in insurance coverage of Avenova by national payors;

we expect to incur substantial marketing and sales expenses as we continue to attempt to increase sales of our Avenova product;

our results of operations may fluctuate significantly;

we may be unable to develop and commercialize our product candidates; and

it may be difficult to forecast accurately our key operating and Past financial performance metrics because of our limited operating history.

We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and maintain profitability. If we cannot successfully market and sell Avenova, either independently or with partners, we will not be able to generate sufficient revenues to achieve or maintain profitability in the future. Our failure to achieve and subsequently maintain profitability could have a material adverse impact on the market price of our common stock. 

7

Risks Relating to Owning Our Common Stock

If our stockholders' equity does not meet the minimum standards of the NYSE American, we maybe subject to delisting procedures.

On April 12, 2019, we received a letter from the NYSE American notifying us that our stockholders’ equity as of December 31, 2018 was below the minimum requirements of Section 1003(a)(iii) of the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”) (requiring stockholders’ equity of $6.0 million or more if a company has reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in its five most recent fiscal years) and requiring the Company to submit a plan to regain compliance by October 12, 2020. On May 16, 2019, the Company was further notified by NYSE American that the Company was not in compliance with the minimum stockholders’ equity requirements of Sections 1003(a)(i) and 1003(a)(ii) of the Company Guide requiring stockholders’ equity of $2.0 million or more and $4.0 million or more, respectively, if the Company has reported losses from continuing operations and/or net losses in three of the four most recent fiscal years. Therefore, the Company is subject to the procedures and requirements of Section 1009 of the Company Guide, and, in compliance with such requirements, the Company submitted a plan to regain compliance on May 11, 2019. The Company was notified on June 27, 2019 that the Company’s plan to regain compliance had been accepted. If the Company does not regain compliance with those standards, or does not make progress consistent with the plan, the NYSE American staff may commence delisting proceedings.

If our common stock is delisted, this could, among other things, substantially impair our ability to raise additional funds; result in a loss of institutional investor interest and fewer financing opportunities for us; and/or result in potential breaches of representations or covenants of our warrants, subscription agreements or other agreements pursuant to which we made representations or covenants relating to our compliance with applicable listing requirements. Claims related to any such breaches, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation, significant liabilities and diversion of our management's time and attention and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, business and results of operations.

The price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially, which mayresult in losses to our stockholders.

The stock prices of many companies in the pharmaceutical and biotechnology industry have generally experienced wide fluctuations, which are often unrelated to the operating performance of those companies. The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile and could fluctuate in response to, among other things:

the announcement of new products by us or our competitors;

the announcement of partnering arrangements by us or our competitors;

quarterly variations in our or our competitors' results of operations;

announcements by us related to litigation;

changes in our earnings estimates, investors' perceptions, recommendations by securities analysts or our failure to achieve analysts' earnings estimates;

developments in our industry; and

general, economic and market conditions, including volatility in the financial markets, a decrease in consumer confidence and other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors.

8

The volume of trading of our common stock maybe low, leaving our common stock open to the risk of high volatility.

The number of shares of our common stock being actively traded may be very low and any stockholder wishing to sell his, her, or its stock may cause a significant fluctuation in the price of our stock. We have a number of large stockholders, including our two largest stockholders, Mr. Jian Ping Fu and China Pioneer Pharma Holdings Limited (“China Pioneer”). As of March 24, 2020, each of Mr. Fu and China Pioneer owned approximately 18.9% and 18.5% of our common stock, respectively. The sale of a substantial number of shares of common stock by such large stockholders within a short period of time could cause our stock price to decrease substantially. In addition, low trading volume of a stock increases the possibility that, despite rules against such activity, the price of the stock may be manipulated by persons acting in their own self-interest. We may not have adequate market makers and market making activity to prevent manipulation.

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that could discourage a third party from making a takeover offer that is beneficial to our stockholders.

Anti-takeover provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, bylaws and Delaware law may have the effect of deterring or delaying attempts by our stockholders to remove or replace management, engage in proxy contests and effect changes in control. The provisions of our charter documents include:

a classified board so that only one of the three classes of directors on our Board of Directors is elected each year;

elimination of cumulative voting in the election of directors;

procedures for advance notification of stockholder nominations and proposals;

the ability of our Board of Directors to amend our bylaws without stockholder approval; and

the ability of our Board of Directors to issue up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock without stockholder approval upon the terms and conditions and with the rights, privileges and preferences as our Board of Directors may determine.

In addition, as a Delaware corporation, we are subject to the Delaware General Corporation Law (“DGCL”), which includes provisions that may have the effect of deterring hostile takeovers or delaying or preventing changes in control or management of our Company. Provisions of the DGCL could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire a majority of our outstanding voting stock by discouraging a hostile bid, or delaying, preventing or deterring a merger, acquisition or tender offer in which our stockholders could receive a premium for their shares, or effect a proxy contest for control of NovaBay or other changes in our management.

We have not paid dividends in the past and do not expect to pay dividends in the future, and any return on investment maybe limited to the value of our stock.

We have never paid cash dividends on our common stock and do not anticipate paying cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The payment of dividends on our common stock will depend on our earnings, financial condition and other business and economic factors affecting us at such time as our Board of Directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends, you will experience a return on your investment in our shares only if our stock price appreciates. We cannot assure you that you will receive a return on your investment when you do sell your shares or that you will not lose the entire amount of your investment. 

China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong, Mr. Jian Ping Fu, and/or China Kington might influence our corporate matters in a manner that is not in the best interest of our other stockholders.

China Pioneer beneficially owns approximately 18.6% of our outstanding common stock. Our director Mr. Xinzhou “Paul” Li is the chairman of China Pioneer. Pursuant to the arrangement of a certain bridge loan, facilitated by China Kington in January 2016, two (2) directors were nominated by China Kington, including Mr. Mijia “Bob” Wu, who is the Managing Director of China Kington and Non-Executive Director of Pioneer Hong Kong, and Mr. Xiaoyan “Henry” Liu, who has worked closely with China Kington on other financial transactions in the past. Subsequently, Mr. Henry Liu was replaced by Mr. Yanbin “Lawrence” Liu in connection with the closing of the OP Private Placement (as defined below). Effective March 21, 2019, Mr. Jian Ping Fu purchased all of the 1,700,000 shares previously held by OP Financial Investments Limited, and Mr. Fu now beneficially owns approximately 19.0% of our common stock. Subsequent to such purchase by Mr. Fu, effective May 1, 2019, Mr. Lawrence Liu resigned from the Company’s Board. On July 20, 2019, Mr. Xiaopei (Ray) Wang, a nominee of Mr. Fu, was appointed to the Board of Directors. China Kington and its affiliates have served as placement agent for three purchases of Company securities by Mr. Fu during 2016, one purchase of Company securities by OP Financial Investments Limited in 2018 and two private placements in 2019. Additionally, China Kington facilitated the Promissory Note from Pioneer Hong Kong in February 2019.

9

As a result, China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong as a wholly-owned subsidiary of China Pioneer and China Kington have input on all matters before our Board of Directors and may be able to exercise significant influence over all matters requiring board and stockholder approval. China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong and China Kington may choose to exercise their influence in a manner that is not in the best interest of our other stockholders.

In addition, were China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong, and/or Mr. Fu to cooperate, they could eventually unilaterally elect all of their preferred director nominees at a Company Annual Meeting of Stockholders. Even with our classified board, China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong, and Mr. Fu could ensure that four (4) of our seven (7) directors are either nominees of China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong, or China Kington after our 2021 annual meeting of stockholders. In the interim, China Pioneer, Pioneer Hong Kong, China Kington, and/or Mr. Fu could exert significant indirect influence on us and our management. 

If we conduct offerings in the future, the price at which we offer our securities maytrigger a price protection provision included in warrants originally issued in October 2015, reducing the probability and magnitude of any future share price appreciation.

As part of our October 2015 offering, we agreed to provide certain price protections affecting currently outstanding warrants exercisable for an aggregate of 150,526 shares of our common stock, of which the warrants exercisable for 112,526 shares expired on March 6, 2020 (with the warrants exercisable for 394,169 shares previously exercised), and the warrants exercisable for 38,000 shares will expire on October 27, 2020 (the “Warrants”). Specifically, in the event that we undertake a third-party equity financing of either: (1) common stock at a sale price of less than $5.00 per share; or (2) convertible securities with an exercise or conversion price of less than $5.00 per share, we agreed to reduce the exercise price of all Warrants to such lower price (with such provision only applicable to the October 2015 Warrants due to the expiration of the July 2011 Warrants and March 2015 Warrants). The exercise price of the October 2015 Warrants is currently set at $0.2061 as a result of the Company’s transaction with Triton Funds LP. Any further reduction of the exercise price for the October 2015 Warrants could limit the probability and magnitude of future share price appreciation, if any, by placing downward pressure on our stock price if it exceeds such offering sale price. All of the October 2015 Warrants are currently exercisable and will remain so after any exercise price adjustment. In the past, we extended the expiration dates or adjusted other terms of the Warrants as consideration for certain offering conditions, and we cannot assure you that we will not do so in the future to the October 2015. Any such modifications would reduce the probability and magnitude of any share price appreciation during the period of the extension. We cannot guarantee that you will receive a return on your investment when you do sell your shares or that you will not lose the entire amount of your investment. If you do receive a return on your investment, it may be lower than the return you would have realized in the absence of the price protection provisions discussed hereof.

Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes maybe limited.

Under Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation's ability to use its pre-change net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change income may be limited. Since our formation, we have raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on several occasions which, combined with the purchasing shareholders’ subsequent disposition of those shares, may have resulted in one or more changes of control, as defined by Section 382 of the Code. We have not currently completed a study to assess whether any change of control has occurred, or whether there have been multiple changes of control since our formation, due to the significant complexity and cost associated with such study. If we have experienced a change of control at any time since our formation, our NOL carryforwards and tax credits may not be available,a reliable indicator of future performance, and historical trends should not be used to anticipate results or their utilization could be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382. In addition, since we may need to raise additional funding to finance our operations, we may undergo further ownership changestrends in future periods.Please also read carefully the future. If we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOL carryforwards to offset United States federal taxable income may be subject to limitations, which could potentially resultsection in increased future tax liability to us. this report above entitled Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements.

 

Risks Relating to Our Business

 

There is uncertainty about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We have sustained operating losses for the majority of our corporate history. In fiscal 2022, our expenses exceeded our revenues, as we continue to invest in our Avenova and DERMAdoctor commercialization efforts. We will need to generate significant revenues to achieve and maintain profitability, which we have not been able to achieve to date. Our operating cash flow currently is not sufficient to support our ongoing operations, and we expect to continue incurring operating losses and negative cash flows until revenues reach a level sufficient to support ongoing growth and operations. Accordingly, our current cash resources are not sufficient to fund operations at the expected level of activity beyond the third quarter of 2023. As such, additional funding or substantial revenue growth will be needed in both the short- and long-term in order to pursue our business plan. We are continuing to evaluate our current business plan and potential changes to our business and strategic direction. If we do not raise additional capital or our revenues do not reach sufficient levels in the near term, then we may need to implement additional cost reduction measures and changes to our current business plan and strategic direction. Such changes may include altering our existing operations and/or pursing a strategic transaction, such as a divestiture of certain business or product lines and related assets. As a result of these circumstances, our financial statements include explanatory disclosures expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of the uncertainty regarding our ability to continue as a going concern. Future reports on our financial statements may continue to include such disclosures. If we cannot continue as a going concern, our stockholders may lose their entire investment in our securities.

We requireadditionalcapitalto financeour operations as currently conducted, which maynot be availableto us on acceptableterms or at all and may result in dilution to our existing stockholders.

Our current cash resources are not sufficient to fund operations at the expected level of activity beyond the third quarter of 2023, and we therefore require additional capital to fund our operations.  As of December 31, 2022, our cash and cash equivalents were $5.4 million and we had an accumulated deficit of $158.2 million. If we raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings, the ownership interest of our existing stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect our stockholders’ rights. If we raise additional capital through debt financing, we may be subject to covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt or making capital expenditures. If we are unable to obtain adequate financing on commercially reasonable terms or at all when needed, we may have to implement additional cost reduction measures and/or make changes to our current business, which may have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our business may be adversely affected by the continuing coronavirus outbreak.

The COVID-19 pandemic has had and continues to have widespread, evolving, and unpredictable impacts on global society, economies, financial markets and business practices. Overall, the impact of COVID-19 to date has been minimal on the sales of Avenova Spray and the sales of DERMAdoctor products as an increase in online sales has made up for the decrease in revenue from other channels. DERMAdoctor shifted from brick-and-mortar retail partners to online direct-to-consumer marketing during pandemic related shutdowns. Although we and DERMAdoctor have not experienced a material disruption in our supply chain to date due to COVID-19, as the pandemic continues and regions face resurgence of COVID-19, including variants of the virus, and outbreaks of other contagious diseases and related uncertainties, the availability of raw materials, goods and/or services from our suppliers could be disrupted and/or not provided in a timely manner or in the quantities that we require in order to operate our business in the ordinary course, which could materially and adversely affect our product sales, customer service levels and our overall business. In addition, any increases in the costs of goods and services for our business that could result from such disruptions in our supply chain or as a result of inflation in the overall costs of goods and services may adversely affect our profit margins if we are unable to pass along any higher costs in the form of price increases or otherwise achieve cost efficiencies in our operations.  

8

Our future success is largely dependent on the successful commercialization of Avenova.our products, particularly Avenova Spray and our DERMAdoctor products. 

 

The future success of our business is largely dependent upon the successful commercialization of Avenova, which has a limited commercial history but constituted approximately 96% of our revenue for 2019. We are dedicating a substantial amount of our resources to advance Avenova aggressively. If we are unsuccessful in Avenova's broad commercialization, we may not have the resources necessary to continue our business in its current form. If we are unable to establish and maintain adequate sales, marketing and distribution capabilities or enter into or maintain agreements with third parties to do so, we may be unable to successfully commercialize our products, including Avenova Spray and ourDERMAdoctor products. While we believe we are creatingworking to create an efficient commercial organization, we may not be able to correctly judge the size and experience of the sales and marketing force and the scale of distribution necessary to be successful. Establishing and maintaining sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities are expensive and time-consuming. Such expenses may be disproportionate compared to the revenues we may be able to generate on sales of Avenova branded, and/or our DERMAdoctor branded products, which could cause our commercialization efforts to be unprofitable or less profitable than expected.

 

Acceptance and use of Avenova and/or DERMAdoctor branded products by physicians, retail partners, wholesale customers and other customers may depend on a number of factors including: (i) perceptions by members of the healthcare community, including physicians, about the safety and effectiveness of our products; (ii) published studies demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of our products relative to competing products; (iii) availability of reimbursement for our products from government or commercial payers as relates to Avenova Spray; and (iv) effectiveness of marketing and distribution efforts by us and our licensees and distributors, if any. The failure of any of our products to find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing to fund our operations.

Goodwill, intangible and other assets from our DERMAdoctor Acquisition have become impaired which adversely impacted our profitability in 2022, and we may be required to record additional charges to earnings if there is further impairment in the future

We are required under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) to test our goodwill for impairment annually or more frequently if indicators for potential impairment exist. Additionally, at least annually at year end, or more frequently at interim periods, we periodically review our intangible and other long-lived assets for impairment. During the fourth quarter of 2022, we performed our annual testing for goodwill, intangible and other long-lived asset impairment which resulted in us recording a goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment charge of an aggregate of $6.7 million relating to our DERMAdoctor business for the year ended December 31, 2022, which significantly increased our net losses for the year. In the future, we may be required to record an additional significant charge to our earnings in our consolidated financial statements during the period in which any impairment of our goodwill or intangible and other long-lived assets is determined. This could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and stock price.

We face substantial competition in the eyecare and the skincare markets in which we operate.

Avenova Spray faces intense competition in the eyecare market, which is focused on cost-effectiveness, price, service, product effectiveness and quality, patient convenience and technological innovation. There is substantial competition in the eyecare market from companies of all sizes in the United States and abroad, including, among others, large companies such as Allergan plc and Shire plc, and against products such as Restasis, Xiidra, eye wipes, baby shampoo and soap. There are also over-the-counter products that contain hypochlorous acid that compete with Avenova Spray.

For our DERMAdoctor products that operate in the skincare and beauty industries, we also face vigorous competition from companies globally, including large multinational consumer products companies that have many skincare brands under ownership and standalone skincare brands, including those that may target the latest trends or specific distribution channels. The skincare and beauty industries are highly competitive and subject to rapid changes due to consumer preferences and industry trends. Competition in the skincare industry is generally based on the introduction of new products, pricing of products, quality of products and packaging, brand awareness, perceived value and quality, innovation, in-store presence and visibility, promotional activities, advertising, editorials, e-commerce and mobile-commerce initiatives and other activities. We must compete with a high volume of new product introductions and existing products by diverse companies across several different distribution channels. Our skincare and other beauty products face, and will continue to face, competition for consumer recognition and market share with products that have achieved significant national and international brand name recognition and consumer loyalty, such as those offered by global prestige beauty companies like Avon Products, Inc., Elizabeth Arden, Inc., The Estée Lauder Companies, Inc., Johnson & Johnson, Inc., L’Oréal Group, Shiseido, Coty, Mary Kay, Inc. and The Proctor & Gamble Company, each of which have launched skincare brands. In addition, we compete with brands including Dr. Dennis Gross, Kate Somerville, Murad, Perricone M.D., Dr. Brandt, Clarins, Clinique, Dermalogica, Exuviance, La Roche-Posay and Vichy. Additionally, competition may increase as existing competitors enhance their offerings or additional companies enter our markets or modify their existing products to compete directly with our products.

These companies that we compete against in the eyecare, skincare and beauty industries may have substantially greater financial, technical and marketing resources, longer operating histories, greater brand recognition and larger customer bases than we do and may be able to respond more effectively to changing business and economic conditions than we can. Larger competitors in the skincare and beauty industry have substantially greater financial resources for new product research, development and commercialization, both in the U.S. and/or internationally, on a scale that our operations and financial resources are not able to match making it difficult for us to compete with these companies. Additionally, these larger competitors are able to manufacture and maintain product inventories for longer periods of time for the commercialization of their products then we are able to due to our more limited capital resources and liquidity. If our competitors respond more quickly to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, our products may be rendered obsolete or non-competitive. In addition, if our competitors develop more effective or affordable products, or achieve earlier intellectual property protection or product commercialization than we do, our operating results will materially suffer.Competition may increase further as existing competitors enhance their offerings or additional companies enter our markets or modify their existing products to compete directly with our products. We may not be able to sustain growth as competitive pressures, including pricing pressure from competitors, increase. Our ability to compete depends on the continued strength of our brand and products, the success of our marketing, innovation and execution strategies, the continued diversity of our product offerings, the successful management of new product introductions and innovations, strong operational execution, including in order fulfillment, and our success in entering new markets and expanding our business in existing geographies. If we are unable to continue to compete effectively, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. 

9

We are dependent on third parties to supply raw materials used in our products and to manufacture our products. Any interruption or failure by these suppliers or other disruptions to our supply chain may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our ability to make, move, and sell our products is critical to our success. Prior to the DERMAdoctor Acquisition we have historically predominately relied on a single product, Avenova Spray, for our primary revenue stream, which is comprised of our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid. In acquiring DERMAdoctor, we greatly expanded our product offerings and operations, as DERMAdoctor has an extensive global platform, currently selling over 30 dermatologist-developed products in the U.S. and various other countries, with over 40 commercial relationships that supply its products from around the globe. While product sales in the United States have historically driven DERMAdoctor’s revenue, it has strategically sought international opportunities for the sale and distribution of its products. DERMAdoctor’s products are currently offered internationally in China, the Middle East, Europe, Canada, and Central and South America. With this larger operational business and range of product offerings around the globe, comes additional opportunity for us, as well as corresponding additional operating costs and risks in certain areas. A key risk area, which is emphasized further by the current pandemic environment and conflict between Russia and Ukraine, is that of supply chain risk. Our subsidiary, DERMAdoctor, also uses third party contract manufacturers and suppliers, some internationally, to obtain substantially all raw materials, components, and packaging products and to manufacture finished products.

Damage or disruption to our supply chain, including third-party manufacturing, assembly or transportation and distribution capabilities, due to weather, including any potential effects of climate change, natural disaster, fire or explosion, terrorism, pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), strikes, government action, armed conflict, war (such as the conflict between Russia and Ukraine) or other reasons beyond our control or the control of our suppliers and business partners, could impair our ability to manufacture or sell our products. Failure to take adequate steps to mitigate the likelihood or potential impact of such events, or to effectively manage such events if they occur, particularly when a product is sourced from a single supplier or location, could adversely affect our business or financial results.

Further, we rely on third parties to supply raw materials, components, and packaging products, to manufacture finished products, and distribute our products. Any interruption or failure by our suppliers, distributors and other partners to meet their obligations on schedule or in accordance with our expectations, misappropriation of our proprietary information, including trade secrets and know-how, or any termination by these third parties of their arrangements with us, which, in each case, could be the result of one or many factors outside of our control, could delay or prevent the manufacture or commercialization of our products, disrupt our operations or cause reputational harm to our company, particularly with wholesale customers, any or all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

DERMAdoctors operating results are dependent on sales to a few significant retail partners and wholesale customers and the loss of, or substantial decline in, sales or increase in costs to sell our products to one or more of these retail partners and/or wholesale customers could have a material adverse effect on our expected future revenues and profitability.

Retail partners and wholesale partners that purchase our DERMAdoctor products account for most of net sales revenue, and the loss of all or a portion of the sales to any one of these customers could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations generated by the DERMAdoctor business. A small group of retail partners and wholesale customers accounted for most of DERMAdoctor’s gross sales revenue for 2022, which we expect to continue for the foreseeable future. Although DERMAdoctor developed long-standing relationships with its major retail partners and wholesale customers, it generally does not, consistent with industry norms, have written agreements or advance commitments that require these retail partners or wholesale customers to buy from DERMAdoctor or to purchase a minimum amount of DERMAdoctor products. As a result, these retail partners and wholesale customers are not contractually committed to purchase specified quantities of DERMAdoctor products from us at specific times, and, therefore, the product quantities and the purchasing cycles for such products are difficult to predict and may fluctuate each year. Wholesale customers generally place large orders shortly before such products are needed. Therefore, our DERMAdoctor business relies on both having available capital resources to produce such products and its third-party suppliers and manufacturers to be able to quickly respond to DERMAdoctor product needs. If we do not have the capital resources and/or such supply chain is interrupted, it could cause a material adverse effect on our business, reputation with our wholesale customers and our financial condition and results of operations. In fiscal 2022, we experienced a decline from our retail partners and wholesale customers in amount and frequency of sales of DERMAdoctor products in the fourth quarter of 2022 compared to sales from the fourth quarter in 2021, and we expect that this may continue into 2023 with inflationary and/or recessionary conditions in the U.S. and internationally adversely impacting consumer demand for discretionary premium products such as those in the beauty and skincare industry. Additionally, certain of our online retail partners increased the fulfillment fees they charged us for sales of our products through their platform, which increased our cost of sales and adversely impacted our gross profit in 2022.

10

 

If we underestimate or overestimate demand for our products and do not maintain appropriate inventory levels, our net revenues or working capital could be negatively impacted.

Our ability to manage our inventory levels to meet demand for our products is important for our business. If we overestimate or underestimate demand for any of our products, including our DERMAdoctor products, we may not maintain appropriate inventory levels, we could have excess inventory that we may need to hold for a long period of time, write down, sell at prices lower than expected or discard, which could negatively impact our reputation, net sales, working capital or cash flows from working capital, or cause us to incur excess and obsolete inventory charges. We also could have inadequate inventories which could hinder our ability to meet demand, including those of our wholesale and other customers and our retail partners of DERMAdoctor and Avenova branded products. We have sought and continue to seek to improve our payable terms, which could adversely affect our relations with our suppliers. In addition, we have significant working capital needs to meet customer demand for DERMAdoctor products, as the nature of the DERMAdoctor business requires us to produce and maintain certain inventory levels to fulfill our customer and retail partner demand. We generally finance our working capital needs through our cash and cash flows from operations, and if we do not have enough cash and cash flows from our operations, then we may not be able to produce the inventories required to meet demand, which could result in a loss of sales, the loss of wholesale customers and/or retail partners and adversely impact our reputation.

Potential disruptions to our distribution facility could cause interruptions or delays in our business and adversely affect our net sales and results of operations.

Our ability to meet the needs of our consumers and retail customers depends on the proper operation of our Riverside, Missouri distribution facility, where a significant portion of our inventory that is not in transit is housed. Although we currently insure our inventory, our insurance coverage may not be sufficient to cover the full extent of any loss or damage to our inventory or distribution facility, and any loss, damage or disruption of this facility, or loss or damage of the inventory and contents stored there, could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. A natural disaster or other catastrophic event, such as a fire, flood, severe storm, break-in, terrorist attack or other comparable event could cause loss of inventory and interruptions or delays in our business and could render us unable to accept or fulfill customer orders in a timely manner, or at all. Our warehouse is located in an area that has historically been subject to severe storms and tornados. This increases our susceptibility to the risk that severe weather conditions could harm the operations of our distribution facility. In the event that a storm, tornado, fire, natural disaster, or other catastrophic event were to destroy a significant part of the facility or interrupt our operations for an extended period of time, our net sales could be reduced, and our results of operations could be harmed.

Significant disruptions of information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our businesses.

We rely upon information technology systems to operate our businesses. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information (including, but not limited to, personal information and intellectual property), and we deploy and operate an array of technical and procedural controls to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We also have outsourced aspects of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, we are managing independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology and information security systems, and those of our third-party vendors with whom we contract, make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from attacks by malicious third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states and others. While we have invested in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us.

Adverse U.S. or international economic and political conditions could negatively affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is sensitive to general economic conditions and consumer spending. Therefore, we face risks associated with U.S. and international economic conditions, including a recession or other economic downturn, and are subject to events beyond our control including armed conflict, war, public health crises (such as the COVID-19 pandemic), trade disputes, economic sanctions, and their collateral impacts. In particular, consumer spending on discretionary premium items such as skincare and beauty products, as well as eyecare products, is influenced and may be impacted by general economic conditions, wage and salary levels, trends in consumer confidence and spending, interest rates, inflation, and the availability of discretionary income and consumer credit. Accordingly, adverse U.S. or international economic conditions, including recessionary conditions, or periods of inflation or high energy prices may contribute to higher unemployment levels, decreased consumer spending, reduced credit availability and declining consumer confidence and demand, poses a risk to our business. A further and future decline in consumer spending or in retailer and consumer confidence and demand for discretionary premium products such as our beauty and skincare products, would have a significant negative impact on our net sales and our profitability. These economic conditions could cause some of our retail customers or suppliers to experience cash flow or credit problems and impair their financial condition, which could disrupt our business and adversely affect product orders, payment patterns and default rates and increase our bad debt expense. In addition, deterioration in global financial markets could make future financing difficult or more expensive, which could have a material adverse effect on our ability to finance the acquisition of inventory for sale to our customers. Abrupt political change, terrorist activity, and armed conflict and any escalation or expansion thereof, pose a risk of further general economic disruption. In February 2022, armed conflict escalated between Russia and Ukraine and has been ongoing since such time. The sanctions imposed by the U.S. and other countries against Russia following Russia’s invasion of Ukraine to date include restrictions on selling or importing goods, services, or technology in or from affected regions and travel bans and asset freezes impacting connected individuals and political, military, business and financial organizations in Russia. The U.S. and other countries could impose wider sanctions and take other actions should the conflict continue to escalate. It is not possible to predict the broader consequences of this conflict, which could include further sanctions, embargoes, regional instability, geopolitical shifts and adverse effects on macroeconomic conditions, currency exchange rates and financial markets, all of which could impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.

11

Risk Related to Government Regulation

We expect to generatecontinuous revenue from sales of Avenova Spray, which is classified as a cleared medical device by the FDA, but we cannot guarantee that the FDA will continue to allow us to market and sell Avenova Spray as a cleared medical device, which marketing inability would halt our sales and marketing of Avenova Spray and cause us to lose revenue and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.

 

Our ability to generate product sales will depend on the commercial success of Avenova. Our ability to continue to commercializecommercializing Avenova Spray and generategenerating revenue from Avenova Spray depends upon, among other things:

 

 

the FDA allowing us to continue marketing Avenova Spray as an FDA clearance;cleared medical device;

 

acceptance in the medical community;

acceptance in the medical community;

 

the safety of Avenova'sAvenova Spray’s predicate devices;

 

the number of patients who use Avenova for the intended target;Spray;

 

sufficient coverage or reimbursement by third party payors;third-party payors of Avenova Spray;

 

our ability to successfully market Avenova;Avenova Spray to both doctors and patients; and

 

the amount and nature of competition from competing companies with similar products and procedures.products.

 

The sale ofRevenue from the Avenova brand will be subject to, among other things, regulatory and commercial and market uncertainties that may be outside of our control. ProductsThe clearance that we have received from the FDA for our Avenova Spray, NeutroPhase, PhaseOne and other products is subject to strict limitations on the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed. The labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion, and record keeping for all our products, including those that are approvednot subject to FDA clearance, are subject to extensive regulatory requirements.

In addition, there can be no assurance that government regulations applicable to our products will not change and thereby prevent the marketing of some or clearedall our products for marketing by the FDAa period of time or permanently. The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be materially adversely impacted by the emergence of new industry standards and practices or regulationsenacted that could render Avenova as well asmodify, prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the U.S. or in other cleared products less competitive or obsolete.countries. We cannot guarantee that Avenova Spray, our other cleared products, or products that may be approved or cleared for marketing in the future, will not be materially adversely impacted by a change in industry standards or regulations. If changes to industry standards, practices or regulations applicable to Avenova Spray or our other cleared products that we may market and sell in the future cause a delay in continued commercialization or if we cannot make a change to satisfy the industry standards, and practices or regulations, we may not be able to meet market demand which may have a materially adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

 

Additionally, the FDA may request that we submit another 510(k) premarket submission that compares to another predicate device. If we are unable to find an adequate predicate device that is substantially equivalent to Avenova Spray for the treatment claims that we use to sell and market Avenova Spray, we may not be able to obtain the necessary FDA clearance to continue to market and sell Avenova Spray without performing comprehensive clinical trials. In such event, we would need to seek premarket approval from the FDA for the applicable product before we could continue to sell and market Avenova Spray in the United States, which would be significantly more time consuming, expensive, and uncertain.

 

12

Our commercialized productproducts such as Avenova like our other clearedand DERMAdoctor branded products isare not approved by the FDA as a drug, and we rely solely on the 510(k) clearance for Avenova Spray and certain of our other products as a medical device. 

 

Our business and future growth depend on the development, use and sale of products that are subject to FDA regulation, clearance and approval. Under the U.S. Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act and other laws, we are prohibited from promoting our products for off-label uses. This means that we may not make claims about the safety or effectiveness of our products and may not proactively discuss or provide information on the use of our products, except as allowed by the FDA. Our products, particularly our DERMAdoctor products, are also subject to regulation by the CPSC and the FTC. These laws and regulations principally relate to the ingredients, proper labeling, advertising, packaging, marketing, manufacture, safety, shipment and disposal of such products. As Avenova Spray is a medical device, we may only legally make very limited claims that pertain to our products'its cleared intended use. Without claims of efficacy, market acceptance of our products may be slow. The 510(k) status of Avenova Spray also affects our ability to obtain formal insurance reimbursement by payors and affects our ability to obtain Medicare coverage.

The FDA does not currently require pre-market approval for products intended to be sold as non-prescription skincare products, so long as they are not marketed for the treatment or prevention of a disease, or as affecting the structure or function of the human body. However, the FDA may in the future require pre-market approval, clearance, or registration/notification of skincare products. Moreover, such products could also be regulated as both drugs and skincare simultaneously, as the categories are not mutually exclusive. If the FDA determines that any of our products intended to be sold as skincare should be classified and regulated as drug products, and we are unable to comply with applicable drug requirements, we may be unable to continue to market those products. Any inquiry into the regulatory status of our skincare products and any related interruption in the marketing and sale of these products could damage our reputation and image in the marketplace. 

 

There is significant risk that the FDA or other federal or state law enforcement authorities may determine that the nature and scope of our sales and marketing activities constitutes the promotion of our products for non-FDA-approved uses in violation of applicable law and as the sale of unapproved drugs, which is prohibited under applicable law. We face the risk that the FDA may take enforcement action against us for the way that we promote and sell our products. This risk may grow with the increased visibility of Avenova Direct online.Spray online, as well as the FDA’s increased focus on antimicrobial products in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. We also face the risk that the FDA or other regulatory authorities might pursue enforcement actions based on past activities that we have discontinued or changed, including sales activities, arrangements with institutions and doctors, educational and training programs and other activities.

 

Government investigations concerning the promotion of unapproved drug products, off-label uses and related issues are typically expensive, disruptive and burdensome and generate negative publicity. If our promotional activities are found to be in violation of applicable law or if we agree to a settlement in connection with an enforcement action, we would likely face significant fines and penalties and be required to substantially limit and change our sales promotion, grant and educationalpromotion activities.

 

11

We have only limited experience in regulatory affairs, which mayaffect our ability or the time required to navigate complex regulatory requirements and obtain necessary regulatory clearance or approvals, if such clearances or approvals are received at all. Regulatory delays or denials mayincrease our costs, cause us to lose revenue and materially and adversely affect our results of operations and the value of our business.

We have only limited experience in filing and prosecuting the applications necessary to gain regulatory clearances or approvals, and our clinical, regulatory and quality assurance personnel are currently composed of only two employees. As a result, we may experience delays in connection with obtaining regulatory clearances or approvals for our products, if such clearances or approvals are obtained at all.

In addition, the products we currently have FDA clearance and/or approval or clearance in other countries as well as the products that we are developing and intend to market are subject to complex regulatory requirements, particularly in the United States, Europe and Asia, which can be costly and time-consuming. With respect to the products that we have FDA clearance, there can be no assurances that the FDA will continue to allow us to market those products without further clinical trials. With respect to products that we are currently developing but have no regulatory clearances or approvals, there can be no assurance that necessary regulatory clearances or approvals will be granted on a timely basis, if at all. Furthermore, there can be no assurance of continued compliance with all regulatory requirements necessary for the manufacture, marketing and sale of the products we will offer in each market where such products are expected to be sold, or that products we have commercialized will continue to comply with applicable regulatory requirements. If a government regulatory agency were to conclude that we were not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, the agency could institute proceedings to detain or seize our products, issue a recall, impose operating restrictions, enjoin future violations and assess civil and criminal penalties against us, our officers or employees, and could recommend criminal prosecution. Furthermore, regulators may proceed to ban, or request the recall, repair, replacement or refund of the cost of, any device manufactured or sold by us.

Developments after a product reaches the market may adversely affect sales of our products.

 

Even after obtaining regulatory clearances, certain developments may decrease demand for our products, including the following:

the re-review of products that are already marketed;

new scientific information and evolution of scientific theories;

the recall or loss of regulatory clearance of products that are already marketed;

changing government standards or public expectations regarding safety, efficacy or labeling changes; and

greater scrutiny in advertising and promotion.

re-review of products that are already marketed; new scientific information and evolution of scientific theories; the recall or loss of regulatory clearance of products that are already marketed; changing government standards or public expectations regarding safety, efficacy, or labeling changes; and greater scrutiny in advertising and promotion. If previously unknown side effects are discovered or if there is an increase in negative publicity regarding known side effects of a product, it could significantly reduce demand for the product or require us to take actions that could negatively affect sales, including removing the product from the market, restricting its distribution or applying for labeling changes. In addition, some health authorities appear to have become more cautious when examining new products and are re-reviewing select products that are already marketed, adding further to the uncertainties in the regulatory processes.

There is also greater regulatory scrutiny, especially in the United States, on advertising and promotion (in particular, direct to consumer advertising), promotion and pricing of pharmaceutical products. Certain regulatory changes or decisions could make it more difficult for us to sell our products. If we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory clearance, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions, injunctions, warning letters, criminal prosecution and other enforcement actions. Any of these events could prevent us from marketing our products and our business may not be able to continue past such concerns. If any of the above occurs to Avenova Spray, or our DERMAdoctor products, our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected.

 

We do not have our own manufacturing capacity, and we rely on partnering arrangements or third-party manufacturers for the manufacture of our products and potential products. 

 

The FDA and other governmental authorities require that all of our products, including those of DERMAdoctor, be manufactured in strict compliance with federal Quality Systems Regulations (“QSR”) and other applicable government regulations and corresponding foreign standards. We do not currently operate manufacturing facilities for production of our products. As a result, we have partnered with third parties to manufacture our products or rely on contract manufacturers to supply, store and distribute our products and help us meet legal requirements. As we have limited control over our commercial partners, any performance failure on their part (including failure to deliver compliant, quality components or finished goods on a timely basis)basis or properly branded products) could affect the commercialization of our products, producing additional losses and reducing or delaying product revenues. If any of our commercial partners or manufacturers have violated or is alleged to have violated any laws or regulations during the performance of their obligations to us, it is possible that we could suffer significant financial, operational and reputational harm or other negative outcomes, including costly corrective actions, including suspending manufacturing operations, changing product formulations, suspending sales of nonconforming products, or initiating product recalls, change product labelling, packaging or advertising or take other corrective action and possible legal consequences.

 

1213

 

Our products require precise, high-quality manufacturing. The failure to achieve and maintain high manufacturing standards including the incidence of manufacturing errors, could result in patient injury or death, product recalls or withdrawals, delays or failures in product testing or delivery, cost overruns or other problems that could seriously harm our business. Contract manufacturers and partners often encounter difficulties involving production yields, quality control and quality assurance, as well as shortages of qualified personnel. Accordingly, we and our third-party manufacturers are also subject to periodic unannounced inspections by the FDA to determine compliance with the FDA's requirements, including primarily current Good Manufacturing Practice (“cGMP”),cGMP, the Quality Systems Regulations (“QSR”),QSR, medical device reporting regulations (where applicable for Avenova Spray), proper and compliant labeling and other applicable government regulations and corresponding foreign standards, including ISO 13485.

 

The results of these inspections can include inspectional observations on FDA’s Form 483, untitled letters, warning letters, or other forms of enforcement. Since 2009, the FDA has significantly increased its oversight of companies subject to its regulations by hiring new investigators and stepping up inspections of manufacturing facilities. The FDA has recently also significantly increased the number of warning letters issued to companies. If the FDA were to conclude that we are not in compliance with applicable laws or regulations, or that any of our FDA-cleared products are ineffective, make additional therapeutic claims that are not commensurate to the accepted labeling claims, or pose an unreasonable health risk, the FDA could take a number of regulatory actions, including but not limited to, preventing us from manufacturing any or all of our devicesproducts or performing laboratory testing on human specimens, which could materially adversely affect our business. In addition, a prolonged interruption in the manufacturing of one or more of our products as a result of non-compliance could decrease our supply of products available for sale, which could reduce our net sales, gross profits and market share, as well as harm our overall business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.

 

Avenova'sAvenova Spray’s FDA-clearance and our other products that have been cleared by the FDA or products that we may obtain FDA-clearance in the future, if at all, are subject to limitations on the intended uses for which the product may be marketed, which can reduce our potential to successfully commercialize the product and generate revenue from the product. If the FDA determines that our promotional materials, labeling, training or other marketing or educational activities constitute promotion of an unapproved use, it could request that we cease or modify our training or promotional materials or subject us to regulatory enforcement actions. It is also possible that other federal, state or foreign enforcement authorities might take action if they consider our training or other promotional materials to constitute promotion of an unapproved use, which could result in significant fines or penalties under other statutory authorities, such as laws prohibiting false claims for reimbursement.

authorities. In addition, we may be required to conduct costly post-market testing and surveillance to monitor the safety or effectiveness of our products, and we must comply with medical device reporting requirements where applicable for Avenova Spray, including the reporting of adverse events and malfunctions related to our products. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with our products, including unanticipated adverse events or adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, manufacturing problems, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements such as QSR, may result in changes to labeling, restrictions on such products or manufacturing processes, withdrawal of the products from the market, voluntary or mandatory recalls, a requirement to repair, replace or refund the cost of any medical device we manufacture or distribute, fines, suspension of regulatory clearance to one or all of our products that may be cleared in the future, product seizures, injunctions or the imposition of civil or criminal penalties which would adversely affect our business, operating results and prospects.

 

If we were to lose, or have restrictions imposed on, FDA clearances we may receive in the future, our business, operations, financial condition and results of operations would likely be materially adversely impacted.

 

We rely on a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesalersRisks Relating to distribute Avenova.Owning Our Common Stock

 

We intend to rely primarily upon a limited number of pharmaceutical wholesalers in connection with the distribution of Avenova. If we are unable to establish or maintain our business relationships with these pharmaceutical wholesalers on commercially acceptable terms, it could have a material adverse effect on our sales and may prevent us from achieving profitability. We rely on our distribution agreements with McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health, and AmerisourceBergen Corporation to fill Avenova prescriptions at most of the retail pharmacies in the United States. If they are not able to ensure consistent availabilityThe price of our product at retail pharmacies, our revenues will suffer.We rely solely on Amazon.com for sales of Avenova Direct. If something were to impair the relationship between NovaBay and Amazon.com it would have a negative impact on our business.

If we grow and fail to manage our growth effectively, we maybe unable to execute our business plan.

Our future growth, if any,common stock may cause a significant strain on our management and our operational, financial and other resources. Our ability to grow and manage our growth effectively will require us to implement and improve our operational, financial and management information systems and to expand, train, manage and motivate our employees. These demandsfluctuate substantially, which may require the hiring of additional management personnel and the development of additional expertise by management. Any increaseresult in resources devoted to research and product development without a corresponding increase in our operational, financial and management information systems could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Government agencies mayestablish usage guidelines that directly applylosses to our products or proposed products or change legislation or regulations to which we are subject.stockholders.

Government usage guidelines typically address matters such as usage and dose, among other factors. Application of these guidelines could limit the use of our products and products that we may develop. In addition, there can be no assurance that government regulations applicable to our products or proposed products or the interpretation thereof will not change and thereby prevent the marketing of some or all of our products for a period of time or permanently. The FDA’s policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could modify, prevent or delay regulatory approval of our products. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of adverse government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the U.S. or in other countries.

13

We are subject to ongoing FDA obligations and continued regulatory review, such as continued safety reporting requirements, and we mayalso be subject to additional FDA post-marketing obligations or new regulations, all of which mayresult in significant expense and which maylimit our ability to commercialize our products.

 

The clearancestock prices of our company and many other companies in our market segments have generally experienced wide fluctuations in response to various factors, some of which are beyond our control, including those that we have received fromare unrelated to our operating performance. Broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the FDA formarket price of our productscommon stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The market price of our common stock is subjectlikely to strict limitations on the indicated uses for which the products may be marketed. The labeling, packaging, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotionvolatile and record keeping for our products are subjectcould fluctuate in response to, extensive regulatory requirements. The subsequent discovery of previously unknown problems, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, may result in restrictions on the marketing of the products or the withdrawal of the products from the market. If we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may be subject to fines, suspension or withdrawal of regulatory clearance, product recalls, seizure of products, operating restrictions, injunctions, warning letters andamong other enforcement actions, and criminal prosecution. Any of these events could prevent us from marketing our products and our business may not be able to continue past such concerns. things:

 

Our products mayin the future be subject to product recalls that could harm our reputation, business and financial results.

The FDA and similar foreign governmental authorities have the authority to require the recall of regulated products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. In the case of the FDA, the authority to require a recall must be based on an FDA finding that there is a reasonable probability that the device would cause serious injury or death. In addition, foreign governmental bodies have the authority to require the recall of our products in the event of material deficiencies or defects in design or manufacture. Manufacturers may, under their own initiative, recall a product if any material deficiency in a device is found. A government-mandated or voluntary recall by us or one of our distributors could occur as a result of component failures, manufacturing errors, design or labeling defects or other deficiencies and issues. Recalls of any of our products would divert managerial and financial resources and have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations. The FDA requires that certain classifications of recalls be reported to the FDA within 10 working days after the recall is initiated. Companies are required to maintain certain records of recalls, even if they are not reportable to the FDA. We may initiate voluntary recalls involving our products in the future that we determine do not require notification of the FDA. If the FDA disagrees with our determinations, they could require us to report those actions as recalls. A future recall announcement could harm our reputation with customers and negatively affect our sales. In addition, the FDA could take enforcement action for failing to report the recalls when they were conducted.

If we experience unanticipated problems with the products, if or once approved or cleared for marketing, our products could be subject to restrictions or withdrawal from the market which mayhave a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

The manufacturing processes, reporting requirements, post-approval clinical data and promotional activities for our cleared medical devices, are subject to continued regulatory review, oversight and periodic inspections by the FDA and other domestic and foreign regulatory bodies. In particular, we and our current suppliers, and suppliers that we may have relationships with in the future, are required to comply with the FDA's Quality Systems Regulations (“QSR”) including for the manufacture, testing, control, quality assurance, labeling, shipping, storage, distribution and promotion of our products. The FDA enforces the QSR and similarly, other regulatory bodies with similar regulations enforce those regulations through periodic inspections. The failure by us or one of our suppliers to comply with applicable statutes and regulations administered by the FDA and other regulatory bodies, or the failure to timely and adequately respond to any adverse inspectional observations or product safety issues, could result in, among other things, any of the following enforcement actions against us: (1) untitled letters, Form 483 observation letters, warning letters, fines, injunctions, consent decrees and civil penalties; (2) unanticipated expenditures to address or defend such actions; (3) customer notifications for repair, replacement and refunds; (4) recall, detention or seizure of our products; (5) operating restrictions or partial suspension or total shutdown of production; (6) refusing or delaying our requests for 510(k) clearance of new products or modified products; (7) operating restrictions; (8) withdrawing 510(k) clearances that have already been granted; (9) refusal to grant export clearance for our products; or (10) criminal prosecution.

If any of these actions were to occur, it could harm our reputation and cause our product sales and profitability to suffer and may prevent us from generating revenue. Furthermore, if any of our key component suppliers are not in compliance with all applicable regulatory requirements we may be unable to produce our products on a timely basis and in the required quantities, if at all.

the announcement of new products by us or our competitors;

the announcement of partnering arrangements by us or our competitors;

our ability to effectively manage our future growth;

actual or anticipated variations in quarterly operating results;

our cash position;

our failure to meet the estimates and projections of the investment community or that we may otherwise provide to the public;

adverse developments concerning our suppliers or distributors;

adverse developments concerning our customers, including the reduction in products purchased and/or loss of customers;

our inability to obtain adequate supplies and components for our products or inability to do so at acceptable prices;

the failure to increase net sales or increases in our operating expenses;

changes in our earnings estimates, investors’ perceptions, recommendations by securities analysts or our failure to achieve analysts' earnings estimates;

the sale of a substantial number of shares of common stock by any large stockholder, especially within a short period of time;

general, economic and market conditions, including volatility in the financial markets, a decrease in consumer confidence and other factors unrelated to our operating performance or the operating performance of our competitors; and

other events or factors, many of which are beyond our control.

 

14

 

IfOur ability to use our product or products cause a reaction in a patient that causes serious injury, we willnet operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be subject to medical device reporting regulations, which can result in voluntary corrective actions or agency enforcement actions.limited.

 

Under Section 382 of the FDA medical device reporting regulations, medical device manufacturers are requiredInternal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to reportuse its pre-change net operating loss (“NOL”) carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change income may be limited. Since our formation, we have raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on many occasions which, combined with the purchasing stockholders’ subsequent disposition of those shares, may have resulted in one or more changes of control, as defined by Section 382 of the Code. We have not currently completed a study to assess whether any change of control has occurred, or whether there have been multiple changes of control since our formation, due to the FDA information that our device or a similar device has likely caused or would likely cause or contribute to death.significant complexity and cost associated with such study. If we fail to report these events to the FDA within the required timeframes, orhave experienced a change of control at all, the FDA could take enforcement action against us. Any such adverse event involvingany time since our products also could result in future voluntary corrective actions, such as recalls or customer notifications, or agency action, such as inspection or enforcement action. Any corrective action, whether voluntary or involuntary, as well as defending ourselves in a lawsuit, will require the dedication offormation, our timeNOL carryforwards and capital, distract management from operating our business, and may harm our reputation and financial results.

If our product or products cause an unexpected reaction to a patient or patients in certain ways that mayhave caused or contributed to serious injury, we will be subject to product liability claims.

We cannot make assurances that any liability insurance coverage that we qualify for, if at all, will fully satisfy any liabilities brought for any event or injury that is attributed to our product or products. Even if our liability insurance satisfies any and all products liabilities brought against us, any product liability claims may significantly harm our reputation and delay market acceptance of our product or products that may be cleared or approved in the future, if at all.

We expect to rely on third parties to conduct any future studies of our technologies that maybe required by the FDA, and those third parties maynot perform satisfactorily.

Though we do not anticipate conducting further clinical trials in the near future, should we decide otherwise, we may not have the ability to independently conduct the clinical or other studies that will be required to obtain FDA clearance for one or all of our products currently in development or products that we may develop in the future. Should we conduct clinical trials, those trials may be performed by third parties that may not perform satisfactorily, which may have a materially adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations, and prospects.

Our past clinical trials mayexpose us to expensive liability claims, and we maynot be able to maintain liability insurance on reasonable terms or at all.

Even though we have concluded or suspended all our clinical trials, an inherent risk remains. If a claim were to arise in the future based on our past clinical trial activity, we would most likely incur substantial expenses. Our inability to obtain sufficient clinical trial insurance at an acceptable cost to protect us against potential clinical trial claims could prevent or inhibit the commercialization of our products or product candidates. Our current clinical trial insurance covers individual and aggregate claims up to $5.0 million. This insurance may not cover all claims, and we may not be able to obtain additional insurance coverage at a reasonable cost, if at all, in the future. In addition, if our agreements with any future corporate collaborators entitle us to indemnification against product liability losses and clinical trial liability, such indemnificationtax credits may not be available, or adequate should any claim arise.their utilization could be subject to an annual limitation under Section 382. In addition, since we may need to raise additional funding to finance our operations, we may undergo further ownership changes in the future. If we earn net taxable income, our ability to use our pre-change NOL carryforwards to offset United States federal taxable income may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us.

 

If we are unable to comply with the continued listing requirements of the NYSE American, then our common stock would be delisted from the NYSE American, which would limit investors’ We operateability to effect transactions in an intensely competitiveour common stock and rapidly changing business environment, and there is a substantial risk our products could become obsolete or uncompetitive.subject us to additional trading restrictions.

 

The medical device marketOur common stock is highly competitive. We competecurrently listed on the NYSE American LLC (“NYSE American”) and the continued listing of our common stock on the NYSE American is contingent on our continued compliance with many medical device companies globallya number of listing requirements. If we are unable to comply with the continued listing requirements of the NYSE American, our common stock would be delisted from the NYSE American, which would limit investors’ ability to effect transactions in connection with our cleared productscommon stock and subject us to additional trading restrictions. In order to maintain our listing, we must maintain certain share prices, financial and share distribution targets, including maintaining a minimum amount of stockholders’ equity and a minimum number of public stockholders, as well as satisfy other listing requirements of the NYSE American. In addition to these objective standards, NYSE American may delist the securities of any issuer for other reasons involving the judgment of NYSE American. For example, the NYSE American Company Guide (the “Company Guide”) provides that the NYSE American may suspend or remove from listing any common stock selling for a substantial period of time at a low price per share, if the issuer shall fail to effect a reverse split of such shares within a reasonable time after being notified that NYSE American deems such action to be appropriate under all the circumstances. On October 3, 2022, we received a letter from the NYSE American stating that we were not, at that time, in compliance with certain NYSE American continued listing standards (“Deficiency Letter”). Specifically, the Deficiency Letter indicated that we were not in compliance with Section 1003(f)(v) of the Company Guide because the NYSE American staff determined that our products under development, if and when those products are cleared or approved. Mostcommon stock has been selling for a low price per share for a substantial period of time. We regained compliance with the NYSE American listing requirements that were set forth in this Deficiency Notice by effecting our current and potential competitors have, and will continue to have, substantially greater financial, technological, research and development, regulatory and clinical, manufacturing, marketing and sales, distribution and personnel resources than we do.Reverse Stock Split. There can beis no assurance that we will have sufficient resources to successfully commercialize our products, if and when they are approved for sale. Current or future competitors could develop alternative technologies, products or materials that are more effective, easier to use or more economical than what we develop. If our technologies or products become obsolete or uncompetitive, our related product sales would decrease. This would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Avenova faces substantial competition in the eye care markets in which we operate.

We face intense competition in the eye care market, which is focused on cost-effectiveness, price, service, product effectiveness and quality, patient convenience and technological innovation. Avenova faces substantial competition in the eye care market from companies of all sizes in the United States and abroad, including, among others, large companies such as Allergan plc and Shire plc, against products such as Restasis, Xiidra, eye wipes, baby shampoo and soap. These products are not saline with hydrochlorous acid as a preservative in solution and they are prescribed for eyelid and lash disease symptom management. There are also over-the-counter products that contain hypochlorous acid that compete with Avenova. Competition may increase further as existing competitors enhance their offerings or additional companies enter our markets or modify their existing products to compete directly with our products. The hypochlorous acid is used as only a preservative and Avenova relies on the 99.99% saline solution as its active ingredient. Many of our competitors have substantially more resources and a greater marketing scale than we do. We may not be able to sustainmaintain compliance with the NYSE American continued listing rules and/or continue its listing on the NYSE American in the future.

If the NYSE American delists our current levels of growth as competitive pressures, including pricing pressurecommon stock from competitors, increase.trading on its exchange and we are not able to list our securities on another national securities exchange, we expect the common stock would qualify to be quoted on an over-the-counter market. If our competitors respond more quicklythis were to new or emerging technologies and changes in customer requirements, our products may be rendered obsolete or non-competitive. In addition, if our competitors develop more effective or affordable products, or achieve earlier patent protection or product commercialization thanoccur, we do, our operating results will materially suffer.could face significant material adverse consequences, including:

a limited availability of market quotations for our securities; 

reduced liquidity for our securities;

substantially impair our ability to raise additional funds;

result in a loss of institutional investor interest and a decreased ability to issue additional securities or obtain additional financing in the future;

a determination that our common stock is a “penny stock,” which will require brokers trading in our common stock to adhere to more stringent rules and possibly result in a reduced level of trading activity in the secondary trading market for our securities;

a limited amount of news and analyst coverage; and

potential breaches of representations or covenants of our agreements pursuant to which we made representations or covenants relating to our compliance with applicable listing requirements, which, regardless of merit, could result in costly litigation, significant liabilities and diversion of our management’s time and attention and could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, business and results of operations.

 

15

 

We may issue additional shares of our common stock, other series or classes of preferred stock or other equity securities without your approval, which would dilute your ownership interests and may depress the market price of your shares.

We may issue additional shares of our common stock, other series or classes of preferred stock, in addition to our Series B Non-Voting Convertible Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock” and together with the Series C Preferred Stock, the “Preferred Stock”) and Series C Preferred Stock, units, warrants or other equity securities of equal or senior rank in the future in order to fund our operations, provide working capital and for other purposes, including in connection with, among other things, future acquisitions, repayment of outstanding indebtedness, repricing of warrants or other outstanding securities or pursuant to our 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan. These issuances of additional securities shall occur without stockholder approval in most circumstances. Our issuance of additional shares of our common stock, preferred stock or other equity securities of equal or senior rank could have the following effects:

your proportionate ownership interest in NovaBay will decrease;

the relative voting strength of each previously outstanding share of common stock may be diminished; and/or

the market price of your shares of common stock may decline.

We may require additional capital funding that may not be available to us or, if received, may not be available to us on favorable terms, which may impair the value of our common stock, Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock.

If our working capital needs exceed our current expectations, or we expand more rapidly than currently anticipated, we may need to raise additional capital through public or private equity offerings or debt financings. Our future capital requirements depend on many factors including our cash position, revenue and our overall operating expenses. We do not know whether additional financing will be available when needed or will be available on terms favorable to us. If we cannot raise needed funds on acceptable terms, we may not be able to develop new products or enhance our existing products, be able to fully fund the capabilitiescommercialization and sale of our currentproducts, take advantage of future opportunities or respond to competitive pressures or unanticipated requirements. To the extent we raise additional capital by issuing equity securities, our stockholders may experience substantial dilution and the new products to keep pace withequity securities may have greater rights, preferences or privileges than our industry's rapidly changing technologyexisting common stock, Series B Preferred Stock and customer requirements.Series C Preferred Stock.

 

Our industry is characterized by rapid technological changes, frequent new product introductionsAs a result of the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock, the conversion of the Series C Preferred Stock, the exercise of the 2022 Warrants, the exercise of the September 2022 Warrants and enhancementsthe exercise of our other common stock purchase warrants previously issued, our stockholders will experience significant dilution.

We have a significant number of Company securities that are or will be convertible and/or exercisable into shares of our common stock. These Company securities include 2,250 shares of Series C Preferred Stock that are convertible into 357,750 shares of common stock (subject to potential increase or other adjustment in the number of shares due to applicable anti-dilution adjustments), the 2022 Warrants issued in the 2022 Private Placement that are exercisable into 1,031,752 shares of common stock, the 11,620 shares of Series B Preferred Stock that are convertible into 1,847,580 shares of common stock (subject to potential increase or other adjustment in the number of shares due to applicable anti-dilution adjustments), the September 2022 Warrants issued in the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction that are exercisable for an aggregate of 327,860 shares of common stock, and evolving industry standards. Our future success will depend significantly onall of our ability to keep pace with technological developmentsother outstanding common stock purchase warrants that are exercisable for an aggregate of 945,907 shares of common stock (collectively, the “Other Warrants”). As of March 27, 2023, we had 2,035,444 shares of common stock issued and evolving industry standardsoutstanding. Accordingly, upon the conversion or exercise (as applicable) of some or all of the Series B Preferred Stock, the Series C Preferred Stock, the 2022 Warrants, the New Reprice Warrants, the Other Warrants, as well as respondthe exercise of stock options and other equity based awards that have been or will be issued and/or granted by us, the percentage ownership and voting power held by our existing stockholders will be significantly reduced and our stockholders will experience significant dilution.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock, including as a result of the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock and/or the exercise of the 2022 Warrants, the September 2022 Warrants and the Other Warrants may cause the price of our publicly traded securities to changesdecline and make it more difficult for us to raise capital in customer needs. New technologies, techniques the future.

Sales of a significant number of shares of our common stock in the public market could depress the market price of our common stock and make it more difficult for us to raise funds through future offerings of common stock. For example, sales of shares of common stock that are issuable upon conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and the Series C Preferred Stock and/or productsthe exercise of the 2022 Warrants, the September 2022 Warrants and the Other Warrants may cause the price of our publicly traded securities to decline. The shares of common stock underlying the shares of Series B Preferred Stock and Series C Preferred Stock, the 2022 Warrants, the September 2022 Warrants and other outstanding warrants represent, in the aggregate, approximately 222%of the total number of shares of common stock outstanding as of March 27, 2023. Upon conversion or exercise, as the case may be, of those securities, the shares of common stock we issue upon such conversion or exercise could emergebe sold into the public market, and such sales could be significant and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock. Additionally, such conversion or exercise could make it more difficult for us to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and/or at a price that mightwe deem reasonable or appropriate, or at all.

16

If we offer better combinations ofcommon stock or other securities in the future and the price and performancethat we sell those securities for is less than the productscurrent conversion price of our Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock, then we will be required to issue additional shares of common stock to the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock and systemsthe Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, upon conversion, which will be dilutive to all of our other stockholders.

The Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Certificate of Designation”) and the Certificate of Designation of Preferences, Rights and Limitations of the Series C Preferred Stock (“Series C Certificate of Designation”) both contain, anti-dilution provisions that require the lowering of the conversion price, as then in effect, to the purchase price of equity or equity-linked securities issued by us in subsequent offerings, if lower than the current conversion price. A reduction in the conversion price of either series of preferred stock will result in a greater number of shares of common stock being issuable upon conversion of such preferred stock for no additional consideration, causing greater dilution to our stockholders. For example, the consummation of the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction triggered the anti-dilution protection in the Series B Certificate of Designation, and as a result there are an additional 1,847,580 shares of common stock that are issuable upon conversion of the 11,620 shares of Series B Preferred Stock outstanding as of the date of this report. Furthermore, as there is no floor on the conversion price for the Series B Preferred Stock or the Series C Preferred Stock, and, therefore, we cannot determine the total number of shares issuable upon conversion that may occur in the future. In addition, it is possible that we currently sell, Avenovamay not have a sufficient number of authorized and available shares of common stock in particular, and productsthe future to satisfy the conversion of the Series B Preferred Stock and/or Series C Preferred Stock, as the case may be, if we enter into a future transaction that we plan to sell. It is critical to our success that we anticipate changes in technology and customer requirements and physician, hospital and healthcare provider practices and successfully introduce new, enhanced and competitive technologies to meet our prospective customers' needs on a timely and cost-effective basis.reduces the applicable conversion price of such securities.

 

We have not paid dividends or repurchased stock in the past and do not expect to pay dividends or repurchase stock in the future, and any return on investment mayDemandsbe limited to the value of third-party payors, cost reduction pressures among our customers, restrictive reimbursement practices, and cost-saving and other financial measures maystock.adversely affect our business.

 

Currently, noneWe have never paid cash dividends on, or repurchased shares of, our products are reimbursed by federal healthcare programs, such as Medicarecommon stock and Medicaid, anddo not anticipate paying cash dividends or repurchasing shares of our common stock in the foreseeable future. In addition, we do not anticipate that they will be reimbursed by such programs in the future. Our ability to negotiate favorable contracts with non-governmental payors, including managed-care planspaying any dividends or group purchasing organizations (“GPOs”), even if facilitated by our distributors, may significantly affect revenue and operating results. Our customers continue to face cost reduction pressures that may cause them to curtail their use of, or reimbursement for somerepurchasing any shares of our products,Preferred Stock; however, if we pay dividends on our shares of common stock, we are required to negotiate reduced fees or other concessions or to delay payment. In addition, third-party payors may reduce or limit reimbursement forpay dividends on our products in the future, suchPreferred Stock on an as by withdrawing their coverage policies, canceling any future contracts with us, reviewing and adjusting the rateconverted basis. The payment of reimbursement, or imposing limitationsdividends on, coverage. Furthermore, the increasing leverage of organized buying groups among non-governmental payors may reduce market prices for our products and services, thereby reducing our profitability. Reductions in price increases or the amounts received from current customers, lower pricing forrepurchase of shares of, our products to new customers,common stock or limitations or reductions in reimbursement could have a material adverse effectPreferred Stock will depend on our financial position, cash flows and results of operations.

Federal and state healthcare reform legislation, including the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, as amended by the Health Care and Education Reconciliation Act of 2010, or the “Affordable Care Act,” may also adversely affect our business. The Affordable Care Act contains provisions aimed at improving quality and decreasing costs in the Medicare program, such as value-based payment programs and reduced hospital payments for avoidable readmissions and hospital acquired conditions. The Affordable Care Act has been, and continues to be, subject to judicial and legislative challenges seeking to modify, limit, replace, or repeal the legislation. While we cannot predict what additional healthcare programs and regulations will be implemented at the federal or state level, or the effect of any future legislation or regulation on our business, any changes that lower potential reimbursement for our products, impose additional costs, reduce the potential number of people eligible for reimbursement for the use of our products, or otherwise reduce demand for our products, could adversely affect our business,earnings, financial condition and resultsother business and economic factors affecting us at such time as our Board of operations.Directors may consider relevant. If we do not pay dividends or repurchase stock, holders of our common stock will experience a return on their investment in our shares only if our stock price appreciates.

 

Risks Related to Potential Litigation

The pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries are characterized by patent litigation, and any litigation or claim against us mayimpose substantial costs on us, place a significant strain on our financial resources, divert the attention of management from our business and harm our reputation. 

 

There has been substantial litigation in the pharmaceutical and biopharmaceutical industries with respect to the manufacture, use and sale of new products that are the subject of conflicting patent rights. For the most part, these lawsuits relate to the validity, enforceability, and infringement of patents. Generic companies are encouraged to challenge the patents of pharmaceutical products in the United States because a successful challenger can obtain six months of exclusivity as a generic product under the Hatch-Waxman Act. We expect that we will rely upon patents, trade secrets, know-how, continuing technological innovations and licensing opportunities to develop and maintain our competitive position, and we may initiate claims to defend our intellectual property rights as a result. Other parties may have issued patents or be issued patents that may prevent the sale of our products or know-how or require us to license such patents and pay significant fees or royalties to produce our products. In addition, future patents may be issued to third parties which our technology may infringe. Because patent applications can take many years to issue and because patent applications are not published for a period of time, or in some cases at all, there may be applications now pending of which we are unaware that may later result in issued patents that our products infringe. 

 

Intellectual property litigation, regardless of outcome, is expensive and time-consuming, would divert management's attention from our business and could have a material negative effect on our business, operating results, or financial condition. If a dispute involving our proprietary technology were resolved against us, it could mean the earlier entry of some or all third parties seeking to compete in the marketplace for a given product, and a consequent significant decrease in the price we could charge for our product. If such a dispute alleging that our technology or operations infringed third partythird-party patent rights were to be resolved against us, we might be required to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorney's fees if we were found to have willfully infringed a third party's patent, to the party claiming infringement, to develop non-infringing technology, to stop selling any products we develop, to cease using technology that contains the allegedly infringing intellectual property or to enter into royalty or license agreements that may not be available on acceptable or commercially practical terms, if at all. Our failure to develop non-infringing technologies or license the proprietary rights on a timely basis could harm our business. Modification of any products we develop or development of new products thereafter could require us to conduct additional clinical trials and to revise our filings with the FDA and other regulatory bodies, which would be time-consuming and expensive. In addition, parties making infringement claims may be able to obtain an injunction that would prevent us from selling any products we develop, which could harm our business.

 

1617

 

If our product or products cause an unexpected reaction to a patient or patient(s) or customer(s) in certain ways that may have caused or contributed to serious injury, we may be subject to product liability claims, and if product liability lawsuits are brought against us, they could result in costly litigation and significant liabilities. 

 

Despite all reasonable efforts to ensure safety, it is possible that we or our distributors will sell Avenova or NeutroPhaseour products or products that we currently do not sell but may sell in the future, such as intelli-Case, which are defective, to which patientspatients/customers react in an unexpected manner, or which are alleged to have side effects.effects or otherwise not work for the product’s intended purpose. The manufacture and sale of such products may expose us to potential liability, including regulatory enforcement actions, and the industries in which our products are likely to be sold have been subject to significant product liability litigation.

Any claims, with or without merit, could result in costly litigation, reduced sales, significant liabilities and diversion of our management's time and attention, and could have a material adverse effect on our reputation, financial condition, business and results of operations. We cannot make assurances that any liability insurance coverage that we qualify for, if at all, will fully satisfy any liabilities brought for any event or injury that is attributed to our product or products.

 

If a product liability claim is brought against us, we may be required to pay legal and other expenses to defend the claim and, if the claim is successful, damage awards may not be covered, in whole or in part, by our insurance. We may not have sufficient capital resources to pay a judgment, in which case our creditors could levy against our assets. We may also be obligated to indemnify our collaborators and make payments to other parties with respect to product liability damages and claims. Defending any product liability claims, or indemnifying others against those claims, could require us to expend significant financial and managerial resources.

 

If we are unable to protect our intellectual property, our competitors could develop and market products similar to ours that mayreduce demand for our products. 

 

Our success, competitive position and potential future revenues will depend in significant part on our ability to protect our intellectual property. We rely on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret laws of the U.S. and other countries, as well as confidentiality and nondisclosure agreements, to protect our intellectual property rights. We apply for patents covering our technologies as we deem appropriate.

 

There is no assurance that any patents issued to us, or in-licensed or assigned to us by third parties will not be challenged, invalidated, found unenforceable or circumvented, or that the rights granted thereunder will provide competitive advantages to us. If we or our collaborators or licensors fail to file, prosecute, obtain or maintain certain patents, our competitors could market products that contain features and clinical benefits similar to those of any products we develop, and demand for our products could decline as a result. Further, although we have taken steps to protect our intellectual property and proprietary technology, third parties may be able to design around our patents or, if they do infringe upon our technology, we may not be successful or have sufficient resources in pursuing a claim of infringement against those third parties. Any pursuit of an infringement claim by us may involve substantial expense and diversion of management attention.

 

We also rely on trade secrets and proprietary know-how that we seek to protect by confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, and collaborators. If these agreements are not enforceable, or are breached, we may not have adequate remedies for any breach, and our trade secrets and proprietary know-how may become known or be independently discovered by competitors.

 

We operate in the State of California. California law prevents us from imposing a delay before an employee, who may have access to trade secrets and proprietary know-how, can commence employment with a competing company. Although we may be able to pursue legal action against competitive companies improperly using our proprietary information, we may not be aware of any use of our trade secrets and proprietary know-how until after significant damage has been done to our Company. 

 

Furthermore, the laws of foreign countries may not protect our intellectual property rights to the same extent as the laws of the U.S. If our intellectual property does not provide significant protection against foreign or domestic competition, our competitors, including generic manufacturers, could compete more directly with us, which could result in a decrease in our market share. All of these factors may harm our competitive position. 

 

Our current patent portfolio could leave us vulnerable to larger companies who have the resources to develop and market competing products.

We aggressively protect and enforce our patent rights worldwide. However, certain risks remain. There is no assurance that patents will be issued from any of our applications or, for those patents we have or that do issue, that the claims will withstand an invalidity challenge or be sufficiently broad to protect our proprietary rights, or that it will be economically possible to pursue sufficient numbers of patents to afford significant protection. For example, we do not have any composition of matter patent directed to the Neutrox composition. This relatively weak patent portfolio leaves us vulnerable to competitors who wish to compete in the same marketplace with similar products. If a potential competitor introduces a formulation similar to Avenova or NeutroPhase with a similar composition that does not fall within the scope of the method of treatment/manufacture claims, then we or a potential marketing partner would be unable to rely on the allowed claims to protect its market position for the method of using the Avenova or NeutroPhase composition, and any revenues arising from such protection would be adversely impacted.

17

If physicians and patients do not accept and use our products, we will not achieve sufficient product revenues and our business will suffer.

Even if the FDA has cleared or approves products that we develop, physicians and patients may not accept and use them. Acceptance and use of our products may depend on a number of factors including: 

perceptions by members of the healthcare community, including physicians, about the safety and effectiveness of our products;

published studies demonstrating the cost-effectiveness of our products relative to competing products;

availability of reimbursement for our products from government or commercial payers; and

effectiveness of marketing and distribution efforts by us and our licensees and distributors, if any.

The failure of any of our products to find market acceptance would harm our business and could require us to seek additional financing.

Failure to comply with laws and regulations governing the sales and marketing of our products could materially impact our revenues.

We engage in various marketing, promotional and educational activities pertaining to, as well as the sale of, pharmaceutical products and/or medical devices in the United States and in certain other jurisdictions outside of the United States. The promotion, marketing and sale of pharmaceutical products and medical devices is highly regulated and the sales and marketing practices of market participants, such as us, have been subject to increasing supervision by governmental authorities, and we believe that this trend will continue.

In the United States, our sales and marketing activities are regulated by a number of regulatory authorities and law enforcement agencies, including the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, the FDA, the Federal Trade Commission, the U.S. Department of Justice, the SEC, and state regulatory authorities. These authorities and agencies and their equivalents in countries outside the United States have broad authority to investigate market participants for potential violations of laws relating to the sale, marketing and promotion of pharmaceutical products and medical devices, including the False Claims Act, the Anti-Kickback Statute, the UK Bribery Act of 2010 and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, and their state equivalents, among others, for alleged improper conduct, including corrupt payments to government officials, improper payments, inducements, and financial relationships with and to medical professionals, patients, and sales personnel, off-label marketing of pharmaceutical products and medical devices, and the submission of false claims for reimbursement by the federal government. Healthcare companies and providers may also be subject to enforcement actions or prosecution for such improper conduct. Any inquiries or investigations into our operations, or enforcement or other regulatory action against us, by such authorities could result in significant defense costs, fines, penalties and injunctive or administrative remedies, distract management to the detriment of the business, result in the exclusion of certain products, or us, from government reimbursement programs or subject us to regulatory controls or government monitoring of our activities in the future. 

Failure to obtain and/or maintain required licenses or registrations could reduce revenue.

Our business is subject to a variety of licensing or registration requirements by the FDA, certain states and foreign jurisdictions where our products are distributed. Failure to obtain or maintain required licenses could result in the termination of the sale of certain products in the application states or foreign jurisdictions, or the termination of such products. We may also be subject to fines and other penalties imposed by the relevant government authorities for non-compliance.

The process for obtaining licenses or registrations can be lengthy and expensive and the results sometimes are unpredictable. If we are unable to obtain licenses or registrations needed to produce, market and sell our products in a timely fashion, or at all, our revenues could be materially and adversely affected.

18

We are subject to U.S. healthcare fraud and abuse and health information privacy and security laws, and the failure to comply with such laws mayadversely affect our business.

We could be subject to healthcare fraud and abuse and patient privacy regulation by both the federal government and the states in which we conduct our business. The U.S. laws that may affect our ability to operate include, but are not limited to: (i) the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which applies to our marketing and research practices, educational programs, pricing policies, and relationships with healthcare providers or other persons and entities, by prohibiting, among other things, soliciting, receiving, offering or paying remuneration, directly or indirectly, to induce, or in return for, either the referral of an individual or the purchase or recommendation of an item or service reimbursable under a federal healthcare program, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs; (ii) federal civil and criminal false claims laws and civil monetary penalty laws, which prohibit, among other things, individuals or entities from knowingly presenting, or causing to be presented, claims for payment from Medicare, Medicaid or other third party payers that are false or fraudulent, and from offering or transferring remuneration to a Medicare or state healthcare program beneficiary that the person knows or should know is likely to influence the beneficiary's selection of a particular provider, practitioner or supplier of any item or service for which payment may be made, in whole or in part, by Medicare or a state healthcare program; (iii) the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (“HIPAA”), which, among other things, created new federal criminal statutes that prohibit executing a scheme to defraud any healthcare benefit program or making false statements relating to healthcare matters; (iv) HIPAA, as amended by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health Act of 2009, and its implementing regulations, which imposes certain requirements relating to the privacy, security and transmission of individually identifiable health information and places restrictions on the use of such information for marketing communications; (v) the Physician Payments Sunshine Act, which among other things, requires manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologics and medical supplies for which payment is available under a federal healthcare program to report annually information related to “payments or other transfers of value” made to physicians and teaching hospitals, and ownership and investment interests held by certain healthcare professionals and their immediate family members; (vi) the government pricing rules and price reporting laws applicable to the Medicaid, Medicare Part B, 340B Drug Pricing Program, the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs program, and the TRICARE program; and (vii) state and foreign law equivalents of each of the above laws, such as state anti-kickback and false claims laws which may apply to items or services reimbursed by any third party payer, including commercial insurers, and state and foreign laws governing the privacy and security of health information in certain circumstances, and state and foreign price and payment reporting and disclosure laws, many of which differ from each other in significant ways and often are not preempted by their federal counterparts, thus complicating compliance efforts. Violations of the health information privacy and fraud and abuse laws may result in severe penalties against us and/or our responsible employees, including jail sentences, large fines, and the exclusion of our products from reimbursement under federal and state programs. Defense of litigation claims and government investigations can be costly, time consuming, and distract management, and it is possible that we could incur judgments or enter into settlements that would require us to change the way we operate our business. Certain applicable laws may impose liability even in the absence of specific intent to defraud. Furthermore, should there be ambiguity, a governmental authority may take a position contrary to a position we have taken, or should an employee violate these laws without our knowledge, a governmental authority may impose civil and/or criminal sanctions.

Any adverse outcome in these types of actions, or the imposition of penalties or sanctions for failing to comply with health information privacy or fraud and abuse laws, could adversely affect us and may have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows. Some of the statutes and regulations that may govern our activities, such as federal and state anti-kickback and false claims laws, are broad in scope, and while exemptions and safe harbors protecting certain common activities exist, they are often narrowly drawn. Due to the breadth of these statutory provisions, complexity and, in certain cases, uncertainty of application, it is possible that our activities could be subject to challenge by various government agencies. In particular, the FDA, the U.S. Department of Justice, and other agencies have increased their enforcement activities and scrutiny with respect to sales, marketing, research, financial relationships with healthcare providers, rebate or copay arrangements, discounts, and similar activities and relationships of pharmaceutical and medical device companies in recent years, and many companies have been subject to government investigations related to these practices and relationships. A determination that we are in violation of these and/or other government regulations and legal requirements may result in civil damages and penalties, criminal fines and prosecution, administrative remedies, the recall of products, the total or partial suspension of manufacture and/or distribution, seizure of products, injunctions, whistleblower lawsuits, failure to obtain approval of pending product applications, withdrawal of existing product approvals, exclusion from participation in government healthcare programs, and other sanctions.

We are subject to financial reporting and other requirements that place significant demands on our resources.

We are subject to reporting and other obligations under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. Section 404 requires us to conduct an annual management assessment of the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting. These reporting and other obligations place significant demands on our management, administrative, operational, internal audit and accounting resources. The costs of preparing and filing annual and quarterly reports, proxy statements and other information with the SEC and furnishing audit reports to stockholders causes our expenses to be higher than they would be if we were a privately-held company. The increased costs associated with operating as a public company may decrease our net income or increase our net loss, and may cause us to reduce costs in other areas of our business or increase the prices of our product to offset the effect of such increased costs. Additionally, if these requirements divert our management's attention from other business concerns, they could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

A failure of our internal control over financial reporting could materially impact our business or stock price.

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. An internal control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all internal control systems, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Any failure to maintain an effective system of internal control over financial reporting could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely or to detect and prevent fraud and could expose us to litigation or adversely affect the market price of our common stock.

19

Significant disruptions of information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our businesses.

We rely to a large extent upon information technology systems to operate our businesses. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information (including, but not limited to, personal information and intellectual property), and we deploy and operate an array of technical and procedural controls to maintain the confidentiality and integrity of such confidential information. We also have outsourced significant elements of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, we are managing many independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology and information security systems, and those of our third-party vendors with whom we contract (and the large amounts of confidential information that is present on them), make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from attacks by malicious third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage) and expertise, including organized criminal groups, “hacktivists,” nation states and others. While we have invested in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches. Any such interruption or breach of our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us. For example, we distribute our products in the United States primarily through three pharmaceutical wholesalers, and a security breach that impairs the distribution operations of our wholesalers could significantly impair our ability to deliver our products to healthcare providers.

Our business may be adversely affected by the recent coronavirus outbreak. 

In December 2019, a novel strain of coronavirus was reported to have surfaced in Wuhan, China. In January 2020, this coronavirus spread to other countries, including the United States, and efforts to contain the spread of this coronavirus intensified including certain San Francisco Bay area counties (including Alameda county where the Company is located) ordering a shelter-in-place mandate.

The outbreak and any preventative or protective actions that we or our customers may take in respect of this coronavirus may result in a period of disruption to work in progress. Our businesses could be disrupted, and our ongoing and future revenues could be negatively affected. Any resulting financial impact cannot be reasonably estimated at this time but may materially affect our business and financial condition. The extent to which the coronavirus impacts our results will depend on future developments, which are highly uncertain and cannot be predicted, including new information which may emerge concerning the severity of the coronavirus and the actions to contain the coronavirus or treat its impact, among others.

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

 

Not Applicable.

 

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

 

Our principal executive offices and administrative operations are located at 2000 Powell Street, Suite 1150, Emeryville, California. In total, we lease approximately 7,7997,675 square feet of office space in the facility pursuant to the Lease expiring on February 28, 2022.July 31, 2027.

 

18

The Company also

Our wholly-owned subsidiary, DERMAdoctor, leases laboratory facilities and office space at Suite 550, EmeryStation North Building, 5980 Horton Street, Emeryville, California ("EmeryStation") under an operating lease which will expire on October 31, 2020. On July 11, 2016, the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement to sublease 16,465 rentableapproximately 19,136 square feet of real propertyspace at EmeryStation (the "Sublease Agreement"). The commencement date under the Sublease Agreement was September 8, 2016. The expiration date4346 Belgium Boulevard, Building 2, Riverside, Missouri, for light manufacturing, storage, distribution of the Sublease Agreement is October 21, 2020, as amended (while the expiration date of the Company's master lease, as amended, for the EmeryStation premises is October 31, 2020), unless earlier terminatedproducts and administrative functions, pursuant to any provision of the Company's master lease for EmeryStation, or the Sublease Agreement.Subsidiary Lease expiring on December 31, 2024.

 

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

 

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. On July 29, 2019, Mr. John McGovern, the Company’s former Interim President & Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, submitted a demand for arbitration seeking severance in the amount of $370,000 as well as additional damages in connection with his separation from service with the Company. The Company does not believe the claims asserted by Mr. McGovern have any merit, and the Company intends to defend against all such claims. As of December 31, 2019,2022, there arewere no other matters that, in the opinion of management, would ultimately result in liability that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

 

Not Applicable. 

 

19

PART II

 

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

 

Market Information

 

Our common stock is listed on the NYSE American, under the symbol "NBY."“NBY.”

 

Holders

 

As of March 24, 2020,27, 2023, there were approximately 95114 holders of record of our common stock. This figure does not reflect persons or entities that hold their stock in nominee or "street"“street” name through various brokerage firms.

 

20

Dividend Policy

 

We have not paid cash dividends on our common stock since our inception. We currently expect to retain earnings primarily for use in the operation and expansion of our business; therefore, we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon our financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements, restrictions under any existing indebtedness and other factors the Board of Directors deems relevant.

 

Performance Graph

ITEM 6.(1)

The following graph compares our total stockholder returns for the past five years to two indices: the NYSE American Composite Index and the RDG MicroCap Biotechnology Index. The total return for each index assumes the reinvestment of all dividends, if any, paid by companies included in these indices and is calculated as of December 31 of each year.

As a member of the NYSE American Composite Index, we are required under applicable regulations to use this index as a comparator, and we believe it is relevant since it is composed of peer companies in lines of business similar to ours.

The stockholder return shown on the graph below is not necessarily indicative of future performance, and we do not make or endorse any predictions as to future stockholder returns.

  

12/14

  

12/15

  

12/16

  

12/17

  

12/18

  

12/19

 
                         

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

  100.00   12.83   20.95   24.44   4.91   4.06 

NYSE American

  100.00   73.17   87.62   88.68   74.91   85.42 

RDG MicroCap Biotechnology

  100.00   54.53   21.69   20.57   13.81   8.53 

 

[RESERVED]

 

(1)

This section is not "soliciting material," is not deemed "filed" with the SEC and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of our filings under the Securities Act or the Exchange Act whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation language in any such filing.

21

ITEM 6. 

SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA 

The following table presents selected financial information as of and for the dates and periods indicated below which have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and other information. The information set forth below is not necessarily indicative of results of future operations, and should be read in conjunction with "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in Part II, Item 7 of this report and our consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this report.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2015

 
  

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Statements of Operations Data:

                    

Sales:

                    
                     

Product revenue, net

 $6,556  $12,474  $18,127  $11,617  $4,146 

Other revenue, net

  43   34   103   280   235 

Total sales, net

  6,599   12,508   18,230   11,897   4,381 
                     

Product cost of goods sold

  1,738   1,503   2,784   2,464   1,261 

Gross profit

  4,861   11,005   15,446   9,433   3,120 
                     

Operating expenses:

                    

Research and development

  184   259   410   1,371   5,728 

Sales and marketing

  8,767   12,789   13,711   11,809   10,523 

General and administrative

  5,310   5,828   8,636   7,235   8,006 

Total operating expenses

  14,261   18,876   22,757   20,415   24,257 

Operating loss

  (9,400

)

  (7,871

)

  (7,311

)

  (10,982

)

  (21,137

)

Non-cash gain (loss) on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  749   1,311   (101

)

  (2,099

)

  2,149 

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of embedded derivative liability

  424             

Other (expense) income, net

  (1,425

)

  19   12   (68

)

  17 

Loss before provision for income taxes

  (9,652

)

  (6,541

)

  (7,400

)

  (13,149

)

  (18,971

)

Provision for income taxes

  (6

)

  (4

)

  (3

)

  (2

)

  (2

)

Net loss

 $(9,658

)

 $(6,545

)

 $(7,403

)

 $(13,151

)

 $(18,973

)

                     

Less: Preferred deemed dividend

  800             

Less: Retained earnings reduction related to warrants down round feature triggered

  29             

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(10,487

)

 $(6,545

)

 $(7,403

)

 $(13,151

)

 $(18,973

)

                     

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:

                 

Basic

 $(0.48

)

 $(0.39

)

 $(0.48

)

 $(1.40

)

 $(6.82

)

Diluted

 $(0.48

)

 $(0.46

)

 $(0.48

)

 $(1.40

)

 $(6.82

)

Shares used in computing net loss per share:

                    

Basic (after 1 for 25 reverse stock split)

  21,641   16,921   15,324   9,408   2,784 

Diluted (after 1 for 25 reverse stock split)

  21,641   17,058   15,324   9,408   2,784 

  

As of December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

2016

  

2015

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Balance Sheet Data:

                    

Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments

 $6,937  $3,183  $3,199  $9,512  $2,385 

Working capital

  3,694   4,761   4,016   10,148   (106

)

Total assets

  11,220   9,361   10,079   15,381   5,077 

Deferred revenue—current and non-current

     41   3,375   4,053   2,418 

Common stock and additional paid-in capital

  125,997   119,935   113,668   110,772   85,422 

Total stockholders’ equity (deficit)

  973   4,954   2,594   7,101   (5,098

)

22

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

 

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read together with our consolidated financial statements and related notes included in Part II, Item 8of this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as "expects," "anticipated," "will," "may," "goals," "plans," "believes," "estimates," "concludes," determines," variations of thesewords, and similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking statements. As a result of many factors, including those set forth under the section entitled "Risk Factors" in Item1A. and elsewhere in this report, our actual results may differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements. Readers are cautioned that these forward-looking statements are only predictions based upon assumptions made that we believed to be reasonable at the time and are subject to risks and uncertainties. Therefore, actual results may differ materially and adversely from those expressed in any forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, we undertake no obligation to publicly revise or update publicly any forward-looking statements.statements after the date of this report, even if new information becomes available in the future.

 

Overview 

 

We are a medical device company predominantly focused on eye care. We are currently focused primarily on commercializing Avenova®, an FDA cleared product sold in the United States for cleansingdevelopment and removing foreign material including microorganismssale of scientifically-created and debris from skin around the eye, including the eyelid.clinically-proven eyecare, skincare and wound care products.

 

Our leading product, Avenova Spray, is formulated with our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid. Avenova has proven in laboratory testing to have broad antimicrobial properties as a preservative in solution as it removes foreign material including microorganisms and debris from the skin around the eye, including the eyelid.

In the first quarter of 2019, many national insurance payors stopped reimbursing Avenova. Despite consistent demand for Avenova we were challenged by the costs of maintaining an expanded commercial organizationSpray is formulated with our new lower net selling price. In the second quarter of 2019, we made a strategic shift by significantly reducing the number of field sales representatives by about three-quarters and redeploying our remaining representatives in territories that account for about 95% of retail pharmacy sales. This shift allowed us to effectively utilize our streamlined commercial resources to reach higher-prescribing physicians while significantly reducing our operating expenses.

Going forward, our core business strategy is centered around increasing sales of Avenova in all distribution channels: (1) Avenova Direct, our direct-to-consumer model, allowing customers to forego time-consuming doctor visits and trips to the pharmacy; (2) Retail Pharmacies, selling to consumers through local pharmacies across 50 states; (3) our Partner Pharmacy Program, providing a consistent patient experience at contracted pricing; and (4) our Buy-and-Sell channel, allowing patients to buy Avenova during their office visits to their preferred eye care specialist.

Beyond Avenova, we have developed additional products containing our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid and is cleared by the FDA for sale in the United States. Avenova Spray is available direct to consumers primarily through online distribution channels and is also available by prescription and dispensed by eyecare professionals for blepharitis and dry-eye disease. Other eyecare products offered under the Avenova eyecare brand include Novawipes by Avenova, Avenova Lubricant Eye Drops, Avenova Moist Heating Eye Compress, and the i-Chek eyelid and eyelash mirror by Avenova.

Through our subsidiary DERMAdoctor, LLC (“DERMAdoctor”), we offer over 30 dermatologist-developed products targeting common skin concerns, ranging from aging and blemishes to dry skin, perspiration and keratosis pilaris. DERMAdoctor branded products are marketed and sold through the DERMAdoctor website, well-known traditional and digital beauty retailers, and a network of international distributors. We acquired DERMAdoctor in November 2021, and since completing the DERMAdoctor Acquisition we have been working to integrate and expand the DERMAdoctor business in order to achieve strategic objectives that we expected by completing this acquisition, including NeutroPhase®revenue growth, cost reductions and achieving overall profitability. We have not been able to achieve these objectives in fiscal 2022, as DERMAdoctor’s product revenue declined in 2022 compared to 2021, while operating costs relating to these products remained substantially the same. We are working to achieve our overall objectives, as well as continuing to evaluate additional strategies for our Company and its business to address our capital and liquidity needs.

We also manufacture and sell our proprietary form of hypochlorous acid for the wound care market through our NeutroPhase and CelleRx®PhaseOne branded products. NeutroPhase and PhaseOne are used for cleansing and irrigation as part of surgical procedures, as well as treating certain wounds, burns, ulcers and other injuries. We currently sell these products through distributors.

Recent Developments

To help address our need for liquidity and capital to fund our planned operations, we entered into two financing transactions on September 9, 2022, which resulted in our Company raising approximately $5.3 million of gross proceeds, as summarized below. In connection with these transactions, effective November 15, 2022, we completed the Reverse Stock Split, a 1-for-35 reverse stock split of our common stock.

2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction

On September 9, 2022, we entered into certain letter agreements and completed the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction with each of the holders of the November 2021 Warrants and certain holders of the July 2020 Warrants. The 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $2.1 million.

Pursuant to the letter agreements, the November 2021 Warrants and the July 2020 Warrants were amended to: (1) reduce the exercise price; (2) provide that such warrants would not be exercisable until a later date, March 9, 2023; and (3) in the case of the November 2021 Warrants, extend the termination date to September 11, 2028. Additionally, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, we issued to certain participants in the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction that exercised their November 2021 Warrants, as amended, or their Amended July 2020 Warrants, as applicable, the September 2022 Warrants to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock, equal to 100% of the number of shares of Common Stock that a participant exercised. The September 2022 Warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of 327,860 shares of Common Stock.

For additional information regarding the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, the November 2021 Warrants, as amended, the Amended July 2020 Warrants and the September 2022 Warrants, see Note 13, “Warrant Liability” and Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

2022 Private Placement

Concurrent with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction on September 9, 2022, we entered into the 2022 Private Placement, a private placement transaction with certain accredited investors to sell, pursuant to the 2022 Securities Purchase Agreement, units consisting of: (1) 3,250 shares of Series C Preferred Stock convertible into an aggregate of 516,750 shares of common stock , (2) the Short-Term Warrants exercisable for 515,876 shares of common stock, and (3) the Long-Term Warrants exercisable for 515,876 shares of common stock. On November 18, 2022, we closed the 2022 Private Placement and received gross proceeds of $3.2 million from the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock and the 2022 Warrants. For additional information regarding the 2022 Private Placements, see Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

NYSE Notice

On October 3, 2022, we received a notification from the NYSE American stating that the Company is not in compliance with Section 1003(f)(v) of the NYSE American Company Guide because the Company’s shares of common stock were determined by the NYSE American staff to have been selling for a low price per share for a substantial period of time. We regained compliance with the NYSE American listing requirements by effecting our Reverse Stock Split effective November 15, 2022.

Financial Overview and Outlook

We have incurred net losses and generated negative cash flows from operations since inception and expect to incur losses in the future as we continue to commercialize our eyecare and skincare products and integrate the DERMAdoctor business. Our net losses were $10.6 million and $5.8 million for the dermatology market. For NeutroPhase,years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. As of December 31, 2022, we have established a U.S. distribution partnerhad an accumulated deficit of $158.2 million, total current assets of $11.3 million and total assets of $16.4 million.

Included in our net losses for the year ended December 31, 2022, was an international distribution partner in China. For CelleRx, we began selling directly to the consumer on November 1, 2019 through CelleRx.com, a low-cost online distribution channel leveraging muchimpairment of our DERMAdoctor business of approximately $6.8 million. Approximately $6.7 million of the same infrastructure alreadytotal impairment was reflected in placethe goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment caption in our consolidated statements of operations, and approximately $0.1 million was reflected in the general and administrative caption in our consolidated statements of operations. The impact of the DERMAdoctor impairment on our consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022 was as follows; goodwill was reduced by $4.2 million, other intangible assets, net was reduced by $2.6 million, and property and equipment, net was reduced by $0.1 million. Refer to Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further information on the impairment of our DERMAdoctor business.

We expect to grow commercial sales of Avenova Direct. Avenova, NeutroPhase,branded products and CelleRx are medical devices cleared byexpect to grow commercial sales of our DERMAdoctor branded products through an expansion of domestic and international market penetration, with a particular focus on online channels, and the FDAdevelopment of new product offerings under the Food and Drug Administration Act Section 510(k).both brand names.

 

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

 

Our consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. In preparing these consolidated financial statements, management has made its best estimates and judgments of certain amounts, giving due consideration to materiality. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates and judgments related to revenue recognition, research and development costs, patent costs, stock-based compensation, income taxes and other contingencies.judgments. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other factors that we believe are reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these estimates. 

 

While our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Summary of Significant Accounting Policies), included in Part II, Item 8 of this report, we believe that the following accounting policiesestimates are most critical to fully understanding and evaluating our reported financial results.

 

Allowance for Doubtful AccountsImpairment of Goodwill, Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets and Long-Lived Assets

 

We charge "Bad Debt" expensereview goodwill, indefinite-lived intangible assets and set uplong-lived assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that any such asset may be impaired, that the carrying amount of any such asset may not be fully recoverable or that the useful life of the asset, if applicable, is no longer appropriate. Management uses judgement in making critical assumptions and estimates in determining when an "Allowance for Doubtful Accounts" when management identifies amounts dueimpairment assessment should be recorded, if more frequent than annually, or in the completion of any such assessment. This includes cash flow projections that are in disputelook several years into the future and believes it unlikely a specific invoice will be collected. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, management had reserved $51 thousand and $10 thousand, respectively, primarily basedassumptions on specific amounts that were in dispute or were over 120 days past due as of those dates.

Inventory

Inventory is comprised of (1) raw materials and supplies,variables such as bottles, packaging materials, labels, boxesfuture sales and pumps; (2) goodsoperating margin growth rates, economic conditions, probability of success, market competition, inflation and discount rates. Changes in progress, which are normally unlabeled bottles;judgments with respect to these assumptions and (3) finished goods. We utilize contract manufacturers to produce our products and the cost associated with manufacturing is included in inventory. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, management hadestimates could impact any such impairments recorded an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory and lower of cost or estimated net realizable value adjustments of $247 thousand and $104 thousand, respectively.

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value determined by the first-in, first-out method.

23

Leases

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), to enhance the transparency and comparability of financial reporting related to leasing arrangements. The Company adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019. Using the optional transition method, prior period financial statements have not been recast to reflect the new lease standard.

At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow on a collateralized basis over a similar term an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use assets may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or incentives received.

The Company has elected to combine lease and non-lease components as a single component for all leases in which it is a lessee or a lessor. The lease expense is recognized over the expected term on a straight-line basis. Operating leases are recognized on the balance sheet as right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities current and operating lease liabilities non-current. As a result, as of the effective date, the Company no longer recognizes deferred rent on the balance sheet.

Revenue Recognition

The Company generates product revenue through product sales to its major distribution partners, a limited number of distributors and via its webstore and Amazon.com. Product supply is the only performance obligation contained in these arrangements, and the Company recognizes product revenue upon transfer of control to its major distribution partners at the amount of consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to, generally upon shipment to the distributor on a “sell-in” basis.

Other revenue is primarily generated through commercial partner agreements with strategic partners for the development and commercialization of our product candidates. The terms of the agreements typically include more than one performance obligation and generally contain non-refundable upfront fees, payments based upon achievement of certain milestones and royalties on net product sales.

In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as we fulfill our obligations under these agreements, we perform the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or servicesthose recorded in the contract; (ii) determinationfourth quarter of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct2022 as further described in the contextNote 2, “Summary of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and (v) recognition of revenue when (or as) we satisfy each performance obligation.

Performance Obligations

A performance obligation is a promiseSignificant Accounting Policies” in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account in ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU Topic 606”). Our performance obligations include:

Product supply

Exclusive distribution rights in the product territory

Regulatory submission and approval services

Development services

Sample supply

Incremental discounts and product supply prepayments considered material rights to the customer

We have optional additional items in our contracts, which are considered marketing offers and are accounted for as separate contracts when the customer elects such options. Arrangements that include a promise for future commercial product supply and optional research and development services at the customer’s or our discretion are generally considered options. We assess if these options provide a material right to the licensee and if so, such material rights are accounted for as separate performance obligations.

24

Transaction Price

We have both fixed and variable consideration. Under our license arrangements, non-refundable upfront fees are considered fixed, while milestone payments are identified as variable consideration when determining the transaction price. Product supply selling prices are identified as variable consideration subject to the constraint on variable consideration for estimated discounts, rebates, chargebacks and product returns. Funding of research and development activities are considered variable payments until such costs are reimbursed at which point they are considered fixed. We allocate the total transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative estimated standalone selling prices of the promised goods or services for each performance obligation.

For product supply under our distribution arrangements, contract liabilities are recorded for invoiced amounts that are subject to significant reversal, including product revenue allowances for cash consideration paid to customers for services, discounts, rebate programs, chargebacks, and product returns. Because we do not have sufficient historical data to compute our own return rate, the return rate used to estimate the constraint on variable consideration for product returns is based on an average of peer and competitor company historical return rates. We update the return rate assumption quarterly and apply it to the inventory balance that is held at the distributor and has not yet been sold through to the end customer. Payment for product supply is typically due 30 days after control transfers to the customer. At any point in time there is generally one month of inventory in the sales channel, therefore uncertainty surrounding constraints on variable consideration is generally resolved after one month from when control is transferred.

The following table summarizes the activity in the accounts related to product revenue allowances (in thousands):

  

Wholesaler/

Pharmacy fees

  

Cash

discounts

  

Rebate

  

Returns

  

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 $(600) $(61) $(329) $(442) $(1,432)

Current provision related to sales made during current period

  (1,085)  (183)  (4,193)  (247)  (5,708)

Payments

  1,543   231   4,675   257   6,706 

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $(142) $(13) $153  $(432) $(434)

At the inception of each arrangement that includes milestone payments, we evaluate whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimate the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probable that a significant revenue reversal would not occur, and achievement is in our control (such as a regulatory submission by us), the value of the associated milestone is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within our control, such as approvals from regulators, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received.

For arrangements that include sales-based royalties and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, we recognize revenue at the later of (a) when the related sales occur, or (b) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).

Allocation of Consideration

As part of the accounting for arrangements that contain multiple performance obligations, we must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation identified in the contract. When a contract contains more than one performance obligation, we use key assumptions to determine the stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation. The estimated stand-alone selling prices for distribution rights and material rights for incremental discounts on product supply are calculated using an income approach discounted cash flow model and can include the following key assumptions: forecasted commercial partner sales, product life cycle estimates, costs of product sales, commercialization expenses, annual growth rates and margins, discount rates and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. For all other performance obligations, we use a cost-plus margin approach. We allocate the total transaction price to each performance obligation based on the estimated relative stand-alone selling prices of the promised goods or services underlying each performance obligation.

25

Timing of Recognition

Significant management judgment is required to determine the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which we expect to complete our performance obligations under each arrangement. If we cannot reasonably estimate when performance obligations either are completed or become inconsequential, then revenue recognition is deferred until we can reasonably make such estimates. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance using the cumulative catch-up method. Revenue is recognized for products at a point in time and for licenses of functional intellectual property at the point in time the customer can use and benefit from the license. For performance obligations that are services, revenue is recognized over time proportionate to the costs that we have incurred to perform the services using the cost-to-cost input method.

Our intellectual property in the form of distribution rights is determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangements and considered "right to use" licenses which the customer can benefit from at a point in time. We recognize revenues from non-refundable, up-front fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer, and the customer can use and benefit from the license.

Cost of Goods Sold

Cost of goods sold includes third party manufacturing costs, shipping costs, and other costs of goods sold. Cost of goods sold also includes any necessary allowances for excess and obsolete inventory, along with lower of cost or estimated net realizable value.

Research and Development Costs

We charge research and development costs to expense as incurred. These costs include salaries and benefits for research and development personnel, costs associated with clinical trials managed by contract research organizations, and other costs associated with research, development and regulatory activities. Research and development costs may vary depending on the type of item or service incurred, location of performance or production, or lack of availability of the item or service, and specificity required in production for certain compounds. We use external service providers to conduct clinical trials, to manufacture supplies of product candidates and to provide various other research and development-related products and services. Our research, clinical and development activities are often performed under agreements we enter into with external service providers.  We estimate and accrue the costs incurred under these agreements based on factors such as milestones achieved, patient enrollment, estimates of work performed, and historical data for similar arrangements.  As actual costs are incurred, we adjust our accruals.  Historically, our accruals have been consistent with management’s estimates, and no material adjustments to research and development expenses have been recognized.  Subsequent changes in estimates may result in a material change in our expenses, which could also materially affect our results of operations.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company’s stock-based compensation includes grants of stock options and restricted stock units, or restricted stock units (“RSUs”), to employees, consultants and non-employee directors. The expense associated with these programs is recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity based on their fair values as they are earned under the applicable vesting terms or the length of an offering period. For stock options granted, the fair value of the stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. See Note 13, “Equity-Based Compensation” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, for further information regarding stock-based compensation expensein Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Valuation of Contingent Consideration Resulting from a Business Combination

We revalue any outstanding contingent obligations to pay future consideration related to business combinations at the end of each quarter and the assumptions usedrecord increases or decreases in estimating that expense. The Company accounts for restricted stock unit awards issued to employees and non-employees (consultants and advisory board members) based on thetheir fair marketvalue within our consolidated statements of operations. Increases or decreases in fair value of the Company’s common stockcontingent consideration liabilities can result from updates to assumptions such as the expected timing or probability of achieving the specified milestones. Significant judgment is employed in determining these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Updates to assumptions could have a significant impact on our results of issuance.operations in any given period, including adjustments recorded during the year ended December 31, 2022 as further described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

 

Income Taxes

We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amountsEstimates of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

Common Stock Warrant LiabilitiesFuture Product Returns

 

The Company accounts forrecords revenue in an amount that reflets the issuance of common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with the equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) givesconsideration which the Company expects to receive. Accordingly, revenue is reduced for estimated future product returns. The Company’s estimates for returns are updated quarterly based on historical data of actual returns. Actual future returns experience may differ significantly from historical data and could result in significant future adjustments, including a choicereduction of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or (ii) gives the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). revenue recognized.

Common Stock Warrant Liabilities

For warrants that are classified as liabilities, the Company records the fair value of the warrants at each balance sheet date and records changes in the estimated fair value as a non-cash gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.operations. The fair values of these warrants have beenare determined using the Black-Scholes valuation method oroption pricing model, the Binomial Lattice (“Lattice”) valuation model, or the Monte Carlo simulation model where deemed appropriate. These values are subject to a significant degree of the Company’smanagement’s judgment.

 

 

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-11 and changed its method of accounting for certain warrants that were initially recorded as liabilities due to their down round features on a modified retrospective basis. ASU 2017-11 allows companies to exclude a down round feature when determining whether a financial instrument (or embedded conversion feature) is considered indexed to the entity’s own stock. As a result, financial instruments (or embedded conversion features) with down round features may no longer be required to be accounted for as liabilities. We will recognize the value of a down round feature only when it is triggered and the strike price has been adjusted downward. For warrants classified as equity, we will treat the value of the effect of the down round as a dividend and a reduction of income available to common shareholders in computing basic earnings per share.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part II, Item 8 of this report for information on recent accounting pronouncements.

Results of Operations

 

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 20192022 and 20120218

 

 

Year Ended

          

For the Years Ended

December 31,

  

Dollar

  

Percent

 
 

December 31,

  

Dollar

  

Percent

  

2022

  

2021

  

Change

  

Change

 

(in thousands, except percentages)

 

2019

  

2018

  

Change

  

Change

 
 

(in thousands)

  

(in thousands)

      

(in thousands)

 

(in thousands)

   

Statement of Operations

                        

Sales:

                 

Product revenue, net

 $6,556  $12,474  $(5,918)  (47%) $14,374  $10,180  $4,194  41

%

Other revenue, net

  43   34   9   26%  30   24  6  25

%

Total sales, net

  6,599   12,508   (5,909)  (47%) 14,404  10,204  4,200  41

%

                 

Product cost of goods sold

  1,738   1,503   235   16%

Cost of goods sold

  6,623   3,689  2,934  80

%

Gross profit

  4,861   11,005   (6,144)  (56%)  7,781   6,515  1,266  19

%

                 

Research and development

  184   259   (75)  (29%) 174  44  130  295

%

Sales and marketing

  8,767   12,789   (4,022)  (31%) 7,798  8,093  (295

)

 (4

%)

General and administrative

  5,310   5,828   (518)  (9%) 7,489  7,240  249  3

%

Goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment

  6,737     6,737  100

%

Total operating expenses

  14,261   18,876   (4,615)  (24%)  22,198   15,377  6,821  44

%

Operating loss

  (9,400)  (7,871)  (1,529)  19% (14,417

)

 (8,862

)

 (5,555

)

 63

%

                 

Non-cash loss on modification of common stock warrants

 (1,922

)

   (1,922

)

 (100

%)

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  749   1,311   (562)  (43%) 5,446  4,615  831  18

%

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of embedded derivative liability

  424      424   100%

Other (expense) income, net

  (1,425)  19   (1,444)  (7600%)

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of contingent liability

 561    561  100

%

Other expense, net

  (276

)

  (1,577) 1,301  (82

%)

                 

Loss before provision for income taxes

  (9,652)  (6,541)  (3,111)  48%

Provision for income taxes

  (6)  (4)  (2)  50%

Net loss and comprehensive loss

 $(9,658) $(6,545) $(3,113)  48%

Net loss

 $(10,608

)

 $(5,824

)

 $(4,784

)

 82

%

Impact of DERMAdoctor Acquisition

 

The 2021 results above include the financial results of DERMAdoctor beginning at the time of the closing of the DERMAdoctor Acquisition on November 5, 2021 (see Note 3, “Business Combination” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report) which includes product revenue, net, of $0.6 million, goods sold of $0.3 million, $0.2 million in sales and marketing costs and $0.3 million in general and administrative costs. Accordingly, the 2021 results do not represent a full year of DERMAdoctor financial results while the 2022 results do reflect a full year of DERMAdoctor financial results.

Effect of Change in Accounting and Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements

As discussed in “Revenue Adjustment and Revenue Recognition” above and in more detail in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statement in Part II, Item 8 of this report, during the year ended December 31, 2022, we made an accounting policy change election related to fulfillment fees paid to third-party online retailers such as Amazon. While reviewing our accounting policy for fulfillment fees, we identified an immaterial error on our previously issued consolidated financial statements whereby we had been incorrectly presenting revenue net of selling commissions paid to third-party online retailers. Beginning in the third quarter of 2022 and for the year ended December 31, 2022, we began expensing them as incurred as sales and marketing expenses within our consolidated statements of operations. Changes and revisions to prior period amounts presented in this report have been made to conform to the current period presentations. For year ended December 31, 2021, the result of these changes and revisions was an increase of $1.8 million in product revenue, net, which was offset by an increase of $0.9 million in product cost of goods sold and $0.9 million in sales and marketing expenses. These changes and revisions that were applied for the year ended December 31, 2021 and did not impact operating loss, net loss or loss per share in our consolidated statement of operations. The changes and revisions also did not impact cash or ending cash balances in our consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2021, or in previously issued annual Company financial statements.

TotalTotal Net Sales, Product Cost of Goods Sold and Gross Profit

 

Product revenue, net, increased by $4.2 million, or 41%, to $14.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $10.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The increase in product revenue, net, was primarily the result of $4.2 million from the sale of DERMAdoctor products recognized during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to revenue recognized from DERMAdoctor products of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2021. The 2022 results include sales from DERMAdoctor products for the entire fiscal year while the 2021 results include sales recognized only after the DERMAdoctor Acquisition on November 5, 2021 through December 31, 2021.

Revenue from Avenova Spray decreased by $5.9$0.8 million in 2022 from $8.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2021 to $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022. The decrease reflects an unanticipated increase in expired Avenova Spray units returned from retail pharmacies for product purchased prior to the launch of our over-the-counter Avenova Spray product in 2019 and the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020. The decrease was also due to an overall decrease in physician dispensed units sold and units sold through the pharmacy channels. These decreases were partially offset by a continued increase in the number of over-the-counter Avenova Spray units sold through online channels. Additionally, the Company recorded an increase of $0.6 million in revenue from other Avenova branded optical products, including the Company’s NovaWipes by Avenova and Avenova Moist Heating Eye Compress Mask.

Additionally, product revenue, net, from the Company’s NeutroPhase and PhaseOne branded wound care products was $0.9 million higher during the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the year ended December 31, 2021.

Cost of goods soldincreased by $2.9 million, or 47%80%, to $6.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, from $12.5$3.7 million for year ended December 31, 2021. This increase was primarily due to $2.7 million in cost of goods sold recognized from the sales of DERMAdoctor products for the year ended December 31, 2022, compared to the cost of goods sold from sales of DERMAdoctor products of $0.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease2021. In addition, cost of goods sold increased in product revenue, net,relation to the increase in Avenova branded optical products other than Avenova Spray and wound care products sold in the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021.

Gross profit increased by $1.3 million, to $7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, from $6.5 million for the comparable period in 2021, which is primarily thea result of a decreasethe increase in total sales, net, offset by the increase in the net selling pricecost of Avenova products, along with a decrease ingoods sold for the number of Avenova units sold. The decrease in the net selling price as well as the decrease in the number of units sold of Avenova was largely due to a decrease in insurance coverage of the product by national payors. In response to this pricing pressure, NovaBay launched Avenova Direct, which although assisted in increasing Avenova sales, has a lower net selling price.same period.

 

27

Research and development

 

Other revenue, net,Research and development expenses increased by $9$130 thousand or 26%, to $43$174 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, from $34$44 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The increase in Other revenue was due to the Company being relieved of contract liability as a result of changes in contract terms associated with the distribution agreement with China Pioneer in the first quarter of 2019.

Product cost of goods soldincreased by $0.2 million, or 16%, to $1.7 million2022 results include costs incurred for the year ended December 31, 2019, from $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in product cost of goods sold was primarily the result of a higher production cost as a result of non-continuous production.

Gross profit decreased by $6.1 million, or 56%, to $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, from $11.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease in gross profit was primarily the result of decreased product revenue, net.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses decreased by $75 thousand, or 29%, to $184 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2019, from $259 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily the result of our strategic shift of capital resources fromDERMAdoctor research and development toactivities incurred for the commercialization of Avenova.entire fiscal year while the 2021 results include costs recognized only after the DERMAdoctor Acquisition was completed on November 5, 2021 through December 31, 2021.

 

Sales and marketing

 

Sales and marketing expenses decreased by $4.0$0.3 million, or 31%4%, to $8.8$7.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, from $12.8$8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.2021. The decrease was due primarily due to a decreaselower digital advertising and related consulting costs incurred for the Company’s Avenova Spray and other eye care products in the year ended December 31, 2022 compared to the year ended December 31, 2021. Additionally, results for the year ended December 31, 2021, include marketing costs incurred in conjunction with the Company’s CelleRx Clinical Reset product with no comparable expenditures during the same period in 2022. These decreases in sales representative headcount, along with a decrease in complimentary samples of Avenova provided to doctors and contractual samples of NeutroPhase provided to China Pioneer. This decrease was partly off-setmarketing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2022 were partially offset by an increase of $2.2 million in Avenova Direct advertising.sales and marketing costs incurred for DERMAdoctor products compared to $0.2 million recognized in the same period of 2021. The 2022 results include costs of the DERMAdoctor business that we incurred for the entire fiscal year while the 2021 results include costs recognized only after the DERMAdoctor Acquisition was completed on November 5, 2021 through December 31, 2021.

 

General and administrative 

 

General and administrative expenses decreased by $0.5increased $0.3 million or 9%, to $5.3$7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, from $5.8$7.2 million for the comparable period in 2021.

Results for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease is primarily a result2022 include ongoing DERMAdoctor general and administrative operating costs and amortization of a reduction in force.  This includesintangibles related to the resignations of both the then CEO/CFO in the first quarter of 2019DERMAdoctor Acquisition, and the then CEO in the third quarterDERMAdoctor impairment of 2018, resulting in lower executive officer salaryproperty plant and stock-based compensation. Also contributing to the decrease was lower depreciation. This decrease was partly off-set by severance payment and a consulting agreement with the CEO who resigned in the third quarter of 2018 and later resigned from the board of directors in the third quarter of 2019.

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of warrant liability

The adjustments to the fair value of warrants was a gain of $0.7 millionequipment recorded for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared2022. The 2022 results include these expenses for the entire fiscal year while the 2021 results include costs recognized only after the DERMAdoctor Acquisition was completed on November 5, 2021 through December 31, 2021. Additionally, during year ended December 31, 2021, the Company received an insurance reimbursement for costs incurred in conjunction with a dispute with the Company’s former Interim President and Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer which reduced general and administrative costs in the 2021 period. Offsetting these increases were lower legal and professional fees and variable compensation and non-cash stock-based compensation expenses recorded in the 2022 period. During the year ended December 31, 2021, we incurred legal and other professional fees related to the DERMAdoctor Acquisition with no comparable DERMAdoctor Acquisition legal and professional fees incurred in the 2022 period.

Goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment

In connection with the impairment of our DERMAdoctor business, we recorded a gaingoodwill, intangible and other asset impairment charge of $1.3$6.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2022. Goodwill related to our DERMAdoctor business was impaired by $4.2 million as of December 31, 2022, and our indefinite-lived intangible assets and long-lived assets related to our DERMAdoctor business was reduced by $2.6 million. We did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2018.

For additional information regarding the warrants and their valuation, please see2021, for further details refer to Note 11, “Warrant Liability”2, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, includedin Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Non-cash loss on modification of common stock warrants

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recorded a $1.9 million non-cash loss on the modification of common stock warrants, which occurred due to amendments to the Amended July 2020 Warrants and the November 2021 Warrants, as amended, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction with no comparable result in the prior year period. For additional information regarding the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, please see Note 13, “Warrant Liability” and Note 14, “Stockholder’s Equity”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Part II, Item 8 of this report. For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, non-cash gain on changes in fair values of warrants was caused by the reduction in the price of the Company's common stock during the year.

 

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of embedded derivativewarrant liability

 

The adjustmentsAdjustments to the fair value of embedded derivative liabilitywarrant liabilities resulted in a gain of $0.4$5.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019. The gain resulted from the Company’s intent to settle the Convertible Note in cash in lieu of stock pursuant to the August SPA. For additional information regarding the terms of the August SPA, please see Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. The Company did not record a comparable loss or gain for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Other (expense) income, net

Other (expense) income, net, was an expense of $1.4 million2022 as compared to incomea gain of $19 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The expense of $1.4$4.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20192021. For additional information regarding the warrant liabilities and their valuation, please see Note 13, “Warrant Liability”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, in Part II, Item 8 of this report.

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of contingent liability

Adjustments to the fair value of contingent liability resulted in a gain of $0.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2022 with no comparable adjustment for the prior year period. This contingent liability related to potential future contingent consideration of earn out payments that could have become payable as part of the DERMAdoctor Acquisition if specified milestone events were achieved. As of December 31, 2022, we determined that the above-mentioned milestones were not met for the first calendar year of the post-closing earn out and are not expected to be met in the second calendar year of the post-closing earn out, based on projections; therefore, the liability for the potential earn out payments was determined to be zero.

Otherexpense, net

Other expense, net, was $276 thousand and $1.6 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. The other expense, net in 2022 was primarily due to the interestan expense of $204 thousand due on the Promissory Note issued in February 2019, the amortization of the issuance cost of $18 thousand related to the Promissory Note issued in February 2019, the amortization of discount and issuance cost of $831 thousand related to the Convertible Note issued in March 2019, and the issuance cost of $384$166 thousand related to the issuance of warrants in August 2019.the September 2022 Warrants. The other expense, net for the year ended December 31, 2021, represented issuance costs related to the November 2021 Warrants. For additional information regarding the Promissory Note,on our September 2022 Warrants and November 2021 Warrants, please see Note 9, “Related Party Notes Payable” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information regarding the Convertible Note, please see Note 10, “Convertible Note” of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. For additional information regarding the issuance of common stock, Series A Preferred Stock and warrants in August 2019, please see Note 12, “Stockholders’14, “Stockholder’s Equity”, in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

28

Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2018and 2017

For this discussion, see the “Comparison of Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017Statements, in Part II, Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis8 of this report.

Financial Condition, and Results of Operations of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018.

Liquidity and Capital Resources 

 

As of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018,2022, our cash and cash equivalents were $6.9$5.4 million, compared to $3.2$7.5 million as of December 31, 2018. The Company has2021. Our cash and cash equivalents include approximately $2.1 million in aggregate gross proceeds received from the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, and $3.2 million in aggregate gross proceeds from the 2022 Private Placement. Based primarily on the funds available on December 31, 2022, we believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents and cash flows generated from product sales will be sufficient to fund our existing operations and meet our planned operating expenses into at least the third quarter of 2023. We have sustained operating losses for mostthe majority of itsour corporate history and expectsexpect that our 2023 expenses will exceed our 2023 revenues, as we continue to invest in both Avenova and DERMAdoctor commercialization efforts. Additionally, we expect to continue incurring operating losses and negative cash flows until revenues reach a level sufficient to support ongoing growth and operations. The Company's operatingAccordingly, we have determined that our planned operations raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Additionally, changing circumstances may cause us to expend cash flow is not sufficientsignificantly faster than currently anticipated, and we may need to support its ongoing operations.spend more cash than currently expected because of circumstances beyond our control that impact the broader economy such as periods of inflation, supply chain issues, the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and international conflicts.

 

Our long-term liquidity needs will be largely determined by the success of commercialization efforts. To address our current liquidity and capital needs, we have and continue to evaluate different plans and strategic transactions to fund operations, including: (1) raising additional capital through debt and equity financings or from other sources; (2) reducing spending on operations, including reducing spending on one or more of our sales and marketing programs or restructuring operations to change our overhead structure; (3) out-licensing rights to certain of our products or product candidates, pursuant to which we would receive cash milestones or an upfront fee; and/or (4) entering into license agreements to sell new products. We may issue securities, including common stock, preferred stock, convertible debt securities and warrants through additional private placement transactions or registered public offerings, which may require the filing of a Form S-1 or Form S-3 registration statement with the SEC. In the absence of one or more additional transactions and/or substantial revenue growth from our commercialization efforts, there will be substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date these audited financial statements are issued, and we will be required to scale back or terminate operations and/or seek protection under applicable bankruptcy laws. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming we will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to its ability to continue as a going concern.

Cash Used in Operating Activities

Net cash used in operating activities was $6.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2022, which consisted primarily of a net loss of $10.6 million, a non-cash loss of $1.9 million on the modification of common stock warrants, a non-cash gain of $5.4 million on the change in fair value of our warrant liability, a non-cash gain of $0.6 million on the change in fair value of our contingent liability, impairment of our DERMAdoctor business including goodwill, intangible assets and property and equipment totaling $6.8 million, the amortization of intangible assets and depreciation of property and equipment of $0.5 million, stock-based compensation expenses of $0.2 million, and a net increase of $0.5 million in our net operating assets and liabilities.

Net cash used in operating activities was $9.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2021, which consisted primarily of a net loss of $5.8 million, adjusted primarily by non-cash gain of $4.6 million on the change in fair value of warrant liability, stock-based compensation expenses of $0.9 million, and a net decrease of $38 thousand in our net operating assets and liabilities.

Cash Used in Investing Activities

 

For the year ended December 31, 2019,2022, cash used in operatinginvesting activities was $7.9$0.1 million, compared to $5.6 millionwhich was primarily the result of capital expenditures for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was primarily due to the increase in net loss by $3.1 million due to decreased product sales combined with reduction in insurance coveragepurchase of the product by national payors, a decrease in depreciation and amortization expense of $0.2 million, unfavorable changes in working capital of $0.2 million and gain on change of the derivative liability fair value by $0.4 million, offset by the impairment of right-of-use assets and property and equipment of $0.2 million, increase in stock compensation of $0.1 million, favorable change of the warrant liability fair value by $0.6 million, and interest expense related to amortization of debt issuance cost and debt discount of $0.7 million.equipment. 

 

For the year ended December 31, 2018,2021, cash used in operatinginvesting activities was $5.6$12.0 million comparedwhich was primarily the result of $12.0 million, net of cash, paid at closing of the DERMAdoctor Acquisition (see Note 3, “Business Combination” in the Notes to $6.3 millionConsolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report). Capital expenditures were $52 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017. The change was primarily due to the decrease of net loss by $0.9 million, a decrease in stock-based compensation by $1.9 million, an increase in depreciation of $0.2 million, favorable changes in working capital of $2.9 million and change of the warrant liability fair value by $1.4 million.

Cash Used in Investing Activities

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, cash used in investing activities was2021, for the purchase of property and equipment of $19 thousand, $44 thousand and $244 thousand, respectively.equipment. 

 

Cash Provided by Financing ActivitiesFinancing Activities

Net cash provided by financing activities was $11.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which was attributable to net proceeds of $12.1 million from several financing activities during 2019, including the private placement with three accredited investors in June 2019, issuance of common stock to Triton Funds LP in the second quarter of 2019, issuance of the Promissory Note to Pioneer Hong Kong in February 2019, issuance of the Convertible Note to Iliad Research and Trading L.P. in March 2019, issuance of common stock in a direct registered offering and warrant in a simultaneous private placement in August 2019 and issuance of the Series A Preferred Stock and warrants in a private placement in August 2019. The aggregate proceeds of $12.1 million was offset by repayments of $0.7 million on the convertible note issued to Iliad Research and Trading L.P. during the year of 2019. The Company received an additional $0.3 million from exercise of warrants and stock options during the year of 2019.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities of $5.6 million for the year ended December 31, 20182022 of $4.6 million was primarily attributablerelated to the net proceeds fromreceived in the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction of $1.7 million, and the net proceeds received in the 2022 Private Placement of $3.0 million (including the issuance of common stock related toSeries C Preferred Stock and the Company’s private placement of 1,700,000 sharesissuance of the Company’s common stock2022 Warrants), partially offset by $0.1 million for an aggregate pricethe repayment of $5.984 million, netour DERMAdoctor line of $0.4 millioncredit, which was terminated in the first quarter of issuance costs (the “OP Private Placement”).2022. See Note 12,13, “Warrant Liability” and Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further information regarding the OP2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction and the 2022 Private Placement.

 

Net cash provided by financing activities of $0.2was $16.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2017 was primarily attributable to the2021. The Company received net proceeds of $14.9 million from the exercise2021 Private Placement. Additionally, the Company received net proceeds of options$1.8 million from an at-the-market offering and warrants.

29

Quarterly Resultsequity program (“ATM Program”) with Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”). See Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of Operations (unaudited)this report for further information regarding the 2021 Private Placement and the ATM Program.

 

The following table presents unaudited quarterly results of operations for the eight most recent quarters ending with the quarter ended December 31, 2019. This information has been derived from our unaudited consolidated financial statementsNet Operating Losses and has been prepared by us on a basis consistent with our audited annual consolidated financial statements and includes all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, which management considers necessary for a fair presentation of the information for the periods presented.

  

Quarter Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

September 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

  

December 31,

  

September 30,

  

June 30,

  

March 31,

 
  

2019

  

2019

  

2019

  

2019

  

2018

  

2018

  

2018

  

2018

 
  

(in thousands, except per share data)

 

Statements of Operations Data:

                                

Sales:

                                

Product revenue, net

 $1,702  $1,615  $1,789  $1,450  $3,604  $3,142  $2,794  $2,934 

Other revenue, net

  2         41   21         13 

Total sales, net

  1,704   1,615   1,789   1,491   3,625   3,142   2,794   2,947 
                                 

Product cost of goods sold

  593   401   403   341   441   332   479   251 

Gross profit

  1,111   1,214   1,386   1,150   3,184   2,810   2,315   2,696 

Operating expenses:

                                

Research and development

  18   49   32   85   107   45   61   46 

Sales and marketing

  2,157   1,544   1,535   3,531   3,186   3,230   2,977   3,396 

General and administrative

  1,174   1,333   1,198   1,605   1,502   1,344   1,360   1,622 

Total operating expenses

  3,349   2,926   2,765   5,221   4,795   4,619   4,398   5,064 

Operating loss

  (2,238)  (1,712)  (1,379)  (4,071)  (1,611)  (1,809)  (2,083)  (2,368)
                                 

Non-cash (loss) gain on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  (187)  1,480   (487)  (57)  340   267   490   214 

Non-cash gain (loss) on changes in fair value of embedded derivative liability

  1   669   (246)               

Other (expense) income, net

  (259)  (719)  (387)  (60)  6   4   5   4 

Loss before provision for income taxes

  (2,683)  (282)  (2,499)  (4,188)  (1,265)  (1,538)  (1,588)  (2,150)

Provision for income taxes

  (3)     (2)  (1)  (3)     (1)   

Net loss

 $(2,686) $(282) $(2,501) $(4,189) $(1,268) $(1,538) $(1,589) $(2,150)
                                 

Less: Preferred deemed dividend

  800                      

Less: Retained earnings reduction related to warrants down round feature triggered

        29                

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(3,486) $(282) $(2,530) $(4,189) $(1,268) $(1,538) $(1,589) $(2,150)
                                 
                                 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders:

                                

Basic

 $(0.13) $(0.01) $(0.14) $(0.25) $(0.07) $(0.09) $(0.09) $(0.13)

Diluted

 $(0.13) $(0.02) $(0.14) $(0.25) $(0.07) $(0.11) $(0.12) $(0.14)

Shares used in computing net loss per share:

                                

Basic

  27,630   23,096   18,613   17,093   17,089   17,089   17,089   16,406 

Diluted

  27,630   23,213   18,613   17,093   17,089   17,148   17,292   16,670 

Tax Credit Carryforwards

 

As of December 31, 2019,2022, we had net operating loss carryforwards for federal and state income tax purposes of $111.0$133.0 million and $90.5$111.0 million, respectively. The federal net operating loss carryforwards consist of $94.9 million generated before January 1, 2018, which will begin to expire in 2024 and $16.2$38.1 million that will carryforwardcarry forward indefinitely but are subject to thean 80% taxable income limitation.limitation for years following December 31, 2021. The state net operating loss carryforwards will begin to expire in 2028. As of December 31, 2019,2022, we also had tax credit carryforwards for federal income tax purposes of $1.3$0.5 million and $0.3$0.1 million for state tax purposes. If not utilized, the federal tax credits will begin expiring in 2026.2031. The state tax credits have an indefinite carryover period.

 

Current federal and California tax laws include substantial restrictions on the utilization of net operating loss carryforwards in the event of an ownership change of a corporation. Accordingly, our ability to utilize net operating loss carryforwards may be limited as a result of such ownership changes. Such a limitation could result in the expiration of carryforwards before they are utilized.

 

Inflation

Our costs are subject to fluctuations, particularly due to changes in the price of raw and packing materials and the cost of labor, transportation and operating supplies. Therefore, our business results depend, in part, on our continued ability to manage these fluctuations through pricing actions, costs savings projects and sourcing decisions, while maintaining and improving margins and market share. Failure to manage these fluctuations could adversely impact our results of operations or cash flows.

 

Inflation

We do not believe that inflation has had a material impact on our business and operating results during the periods presented, and we do not expect it to have a material impact in the near future, although there can be no assurances that our business will not be affected by inflation in the future.

Off -BalanceOff-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

We did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements at December 31, 20192022 and December 31, 20182021 as defined in Item 303(a)(4)(ii) of SEC Regulation S-K.

Seasonality

SeasonalityDermatology/Skincare Products

 

ConsistentOur DERMAdoctor products are sold through wholesale distribution relationships with our peersthird parties such as Costco and others; therefore, we may receive periodic large orders that result in large chunks of revenue that are received in irregular intervals during the year. Historically sales of DERMAdoctor products that contain sunscreen and antiperspirants are higher in the summer seasons and sales of DERMAdoctor products that contain moisturizers are higher in the fall and winter months. In addition, DERMAdoctor products will typically experience an uptick in sales during the fourth quarter around the holidays of each country in which its products are sold, particularly in the United States pharmaceutical industry, our business experiences seasonality with the first quarter of each year typically being the lowest revenue quarter. This annual phenomenon is due to consumers facing the need to satisfy health insurance deductibles and changes to copays as each new insurance year begins. China.

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Our contractual cash commitments as of December 31, 20192022 were as follows (in thousands):

 

Contractual Obligations

 

Less than 1

year

  

1-3 years

  

3-5 years

  

More than 5

years

  

Total

  

Less than 1

year

  

1-3 years

  

3-5 years

  

More than 5

years

  

Total

 
                    

Facility leases

 $1,025  $513  $  $  $1,538  $535  $980  $734  $  $2,249 

Vehicle leases

  6            6 

Equipment leases

  16   29         45 

Total

 $1,047  $542  $  $  $1,589  $535  $980  $734  $  $2,249 

 

Our commitments as of December 31, 2019 consist2022 consisted primarily of twofacility operating facility leases, the Lease and the lease for EmeryStation, 15 operating vehicle leases, and 2 copiers.leases.

 

The total commitment for the Leasefacility leases were $2.2 million due over the leases’ terms as of December 31, 20192022. Our corporate headquarters lease was $0.9 million due overamended in 2022, which included extending the lease term compared to $1.4 million as of December 31, 2018. 

The total commitment of the EmeryStation lease as of December 31, 2019 was $0.6 million due over such lease term, compared to $1.3 million as of December 31, 2018. On July 11, 2016, we entered into a Sublease Agreement to sublease our former corporate headquarters at EmeryStation. Sublease rental reimbursement is not deducted from the above table. We anticipate collecting $0.6 million in the year ending December 31, 2020, under the Sublease Agreement for the lease of EmeryStation.

We have operating leases for a fleet of 15 vehicles as of December 31, 2019. The total commitment for these leases as of December 31, 2019 was $6 thousand due over the lease terms, compared to $176 thousand as of December 31, 2018.

We have an operating lease for 2 copiers as of December 31, 2019. The total commitment for the lease as of December 31, 2019 was $45 thousand due over the lease terms, compared to an immaterial amount as of December 31, 2018.until 2027.

 

See Note 8,12, “Commitments and Contingencies” in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Part II, Item 8 of this report for further information regarding these leases.

 

31

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

 

Our market risk consists principally of interest rate risk on our cash and cash equivalents, and short-term investments.equivalents. Our exposure to market risk is limited primarily to interest income sensitivity, which is affected by changes in interest rates, particularly because our current liquid assets at December 31, 2019 are2022 were held in cash and cash equivalents.

 

Our investment policy restricts our investments to high-quality investments and limits the amounts invested with any one issuer, industry, or geographic area. The goals of our investment policy are as follows: preservation of capital, assurance of liquidity needs, best available return on invested capital, and minimization of capital taxation. Some of the securities in which we invest may be subject to market risk. This means that a change in prevailing interest rates may cause the principal amount of the investment to fluctuate. For example, if we hold a security that was issued with an interest rate fixed at the then-prevailing rate and the prevailing interest rate later rises, the principal amount of our investment will probably decline. To minimize this risk, in accordance with our investment policy, we maintain our cash and cash equivalents in short-term marketable securities, including money market mutual funds, Treasury bills, Treasury notes, certificates of deposit, commercial paper, and corporate and municipal bonds. The risk associated with fluctuating interest rates is limited to our investment portfolio. Due to the short-term nature of our investment portfolio, we believe we have minimal interest rate risk arising from our investments. As of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, a 10% change in interest rates would have had an immaterial effect on the value of our investment portfolio. We do not use derivative financial instruments in our investment portfolio. We do not hold any instruments for trading purposes.

 

With most of our focus on Avenova in the domestic U.S. market, we have not had any material exposure to foreign currency rate fluctuations.

 

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

 

The financial statements required by this Item 8 are set forth below. Our quarterly financial information is set forth in Item 7 of this report and is hereby incorporated into this Item 8 by reference.

 

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

33

29

Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2019,2022 and 20182021

34

32

Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 20172021

35

33

Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 20172021

36

34

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2019, 20182022 and 20172021

37

35

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

39

47

 

 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRMReport of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

 

To the Stockholders and Board of Directors

of

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Emeryville, California

Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheetssheet of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 20192022 and 20182021, and the related consolidated statements of operations, and comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company atas of December 31, 20192022 and 2018,2021, and the results of theirits operations and theirits cash flows for each of the threetwo years in the period ended December 31, 2019,2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

 

Substantial Doubt Regarding Going Concern Uncertainty

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Companyentity will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Companyentity has experienced operatinga history of recurring losses for most of its history and expects expenses to exceed revenues in 2020. The Company also has recurring negative cash flows from operations and an accumulated deficit. All of these mattersthat raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 1. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.

 

Basis for Opinion

 

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free offrom material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

 

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

/s/ OUM & CO. LLPCritical Audit Matters

San Francisco, California

March 26, 2020The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Product Revenue Allowances for Product Returns

Description of the Matter

As described in Note 2 of the consolidated financial statements, when recognizing revenue from product sales of Avenova Spray to the Company’s major distribution partners, the Company makes an estimate of the amount of consideration the Company expects to be entitled to receive. Upon recognition of these product sales, the Company records estimates for variable consideration consisting of service fees, discounts, rebates, and product returns, resulting in a reduction in product revenue. The variable consideration provisions are recorded within accrued liabilities and in the same period that the related revenue is recognized. Liabilities related to the allowance for product returns involve the use of significant assumptions and judgments in their calculation. These significant assumptions and judgments include historical sales and return rates and inventory levels in the distribution channel, as well as existing return policies with customers.

Management’s estimated allowance for product returns requires a high degree of judgment and is subject to change based on various quantitative and qualitative factors. Accordingly, extensive audit effort and a high degree of auditor judgment were needed to evaluate management’s estimates and assumptions used in the determination of product returns. 

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding of and evaluated the design of controls relating to the Company’s processes for estimating product returns. We evaluated the significant accounting policies relating to product returns, as well as management’s application of the policies, for appropriateness and reasonableness.

To test management’s estimate of product returns, we obtained management’s calculations for the estimates and performed the following procedures: clerically tested the calculation, agreed relevant inputs to the terms of relevant policies, assessed subsequent events related to these estimates, evaluated the methodologies and assumptions used and the underlying data used by the Company, evaluated the assumptions used by management against historical trends, evaluated the change in estimated accruals from the prior periods, and assessed the historical accuracy of the Company’s estimates against actual results.

Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Description of the Matter

At December 31, 2021, the Company had $4.5 million of goodwill and $5.2 million of other intangible assets, which primarily consisted of indefinite-lived trade names and definite lived trade secrets / product formulations and customer relationships. As described in Notes 2, 3, 8 and 9 of the consolidated financial statements, these assets are evaluated for impairment at least annually using valuation techniques to estimate fair value, which involves the comparison of the fair value of each reporting unit or asset to its carrying value. The Company estimates fair value using the income method, which is based on the present value of estimated future cash flows attributable to the respective assets. These fair value estimates are sensitive to certain significant assumptions, including future sales and operating margin growth rates, economic conditions, probability of success, market competition, inflation, discount rates, and royalty rates.

We identified the Company’s impairment evaluations as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to estimate the fair values of the reporting unit and the assets. A high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort was required when performing audit procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s estimates and assumptions related to the forecasts of future sales and earnings as well as the selection of royalty rates and discount rates, including the need to involve our fair value specialists.

How We Addressed the Matter in Our Audit

We obtained an understanding of and evaluated the design of controls relating to the Company’s impairment review process. We evaluated the significant accounting policies relating to the Company’s impairment analyses, as well as management’s application of the policies, for appropriateness and reasonableness. 

To test the estimated fair values of the assets, we performed audit procedures that included, among other things, assessing methodologies used to determine the fair values, testing the significant assumptions discussed above and testing the completeness and accuracy of the underlying data used by the Company. For example, we evaluated management’s forecasted revenue growth rates used in the fair value estimates by comparing those assumptions to the historical results of the Company and current industry, market and economic forecasts. We involved a valuation specialist to assist in evaluating the valuation methodologies and the significant assumptions such as discount rates and royalty rates as well as testing the mathematical accuracy of the calculation. Additionally, we performed sensitivity analyses of significant assumptions to evaluate the effect on the fair value estimates of the assets.

/s WithumSmith+Brown, PC

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2010.

 

San Francisco California

March 31, 2023

PCAOB ID Number 100

 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except par value amounts)

 

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

December 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2022

  

2021

 
         

ASSETS

            

Current assets:

         

Cash and cash equivalents

 $6,937  $3,183  $5,362  $7,504 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts ($51 and $10 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)

  1,066   3,385 

Inventory, net of allowance for excess and obsolete inventory and lower of cost or estimated net realizable value adjustments ($247 and $104 at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively)

  492   280 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts ($19 and $0 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)

 1,973  1,668 

Inventory, net of allowance for excess and obsolete inventory and lower of cost or estimated net realizable value adjustments ($499 and $641 at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)

 3,437  3,220 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  886   1,760   560   778 

Total current assets

  9,381   8,608  11,332  13,170 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  1,252     1,831  411 

Property and equipment, net

  110   201  119  193 

Goodwill

 348  4,528 

Other intangible assets, net

 2,280  5,200 

Other assets

  477   552   489   476 

TOTAL ASSETS

 $11,220  $9,361  $16,399  $23,978 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

            

Liabilities:

         

Current liabilities:

         

Accounts payable

 $331  $551  $1,080  $1,045 

Accrued liabilities

  1,778   3,255  2,724  2,092 

Deferred revenue

     41 

Line of credit

   105 

Operating lease liabilities

  930      453   200 

Notes payable, related party

  1,202    

Convertible note

  1,409    

Embedded derivative liability

  3    

Warrant liability

  34    

Total current liabilities

  5,687   3,847  4,257  3,442 

Operating lease liabilities-non-current

  505     1,588  246 

Deferred rent

     184 

Warrant liability

  4,055   178    9,558 

Other liabilities

     198 

Contingent earnout liability

     561 

Total liabilities

  10,247   4,407   5,845   13,807 
        

Commitments & contingencies (Note 12)

       

Stockholders' equity:

         

Preferred stock: 5,000 shares authorized; none outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018

      

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 50,000 shares authorized; 27,938 and 17,089 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively

  279   171 

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 5,000 shares authorized;

 

Series B Preferred Stock; 12 and 14 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively

 570  680 

Series C Preferred Stock; 2 and 0 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively

 2,403   

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 150,000 and 100,000 shares authorized, 2,035 and 1,365 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively

 652  478 

Additional paid-in capital

  125,718   119,764  165,081  150,900 

Accumulated deficit

  (125,024)  (114,981)  (158,152

)

  (141,887

)

Total stockholders' equity

  973   4,954   10,554   10,171 

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 $11,220  $9,361  $16,399  $23,978 

As the Company adopted the requirements of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 2.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

34

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(in thousands except per share data)

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Sales:

            

Product revenue, net

 $6,556  $12,474  $18,127 

Other revenue, net

  43   34   103 

Total sales, net

  6,599   12,508   18,230 
             

Product cost of goods sold

  1,738   1,503   2,784 

Gross profit

  4,861   11,005   15,446 
             

Research and development

  184   259   410 

Sales and marketing

  8,767   12,789   13,711 

General and administrative

  5,310   5,828   8,636 

Total operating expenses

  14,261   18,876   22,757 

Operating loss

  (9,400)  (7,871)  (7,311)
             

Non-cash gain (loss) on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  749   1,311   (101)

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of embedded derivative liability

  424       

Other (expense) income, net

  (1,425)  19   12 
             

Loss before provision for income taxes

  (9,652)  (6,541)  (7,400)

Provision for income taxes

  (6)  (4)  (3)

Net loss and comprehensive loss

 $(9,658) $(6,545) $(7,403)
             

Less: Preferred deemed dividend

  800       

Less: Retained earnings reduction related to warrants down round feature triggered

  29       

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(10,487) $(6,545) $(7,403)
             
             
             

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (basic)

 $(0.48) $(0.39) $(0.48)

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (diluted)

 $(0.48) $(0.46) $(0.48)

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding used in computing net loss per share of common stock (basic)

  21,641   16,921   15,324 

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding used in computing net loss per share of common stock (diluted)

  21,641   17,058   15,324 

As the Company adopted the requirements of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 2.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITYOPERATIONS

(in thousands)thousands, except per share data)

 

  

Preferred Stock

  

Common Stock

  

Additional

Paid-In

  

Accumulated

Other

Comprehensive

  Accumulated  

Total

Stockholders'

 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

  Capital  Loss  Deficit  Equity 

Balance at December 31, 2016

    $   15,269  $153  $110,619  $  $(103,671) $7,101 

Net loss

                    (7,403)  (7,403)

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of warrants, net of offering costs

        21      97         97 

Issuance of stock for option exercises

        68   1   184         185 

Issuance of stock to consultants for services

        1                

Vesting of non-employee restricted stock awards

        26      106         106 

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee and director stock options

              1,867         1,867 

Stock-based compensation expense related to non-employee and director stock options

              137         137 

Stock option modification

              504         504 

Balance at December 31, 2017

        15,385   154   113,514      (111,074)  2,594 

Net loss

                    (6,545)  (6,545)

Issuance of common stock in connection with offering

        1,700   17   5,967         5,984 

Offering costs

              (399)        (399)

Issuance of stock for option exercises

        4      11         11 

Cumulative retrospective adjustment related to adoption of ASC 606

                    2,638   2,638 

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee and director stock options

              594         594 

Stock option modification

              77         77 

Balance at December 31, 2018

        17,089   171   119,764      (114,981)  4,954 

Net loss

                    (9,658)  (9,658)

Reclassification of Warrant
Liability to Equity – see Note 2

              412      (356)  56 

Down round feature adjustment related to warrants

              29      (29)   

Issuance of Series A Preferred Stock and common stock warrants, net of offering costs

  2,700   584                   

Conversion of Series A Preferred Stock to common stock

  (2,700)  (584)  2,700   27   557         584 

Beneficial conversion feature upon issuance of Series A Preferred Stock

              800         800 

Deemed dividend from beneficial conversion feature of Series A Preferred Stock

              (800)        (800)

Issuance of common stock in connection with offering, net of offering costs

        7,467   75   3,427         3,502 

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of warrants

        389   4   616         620 

Issuance of RSUs related to employee separation agreement

        168   2   218         220 

Issuance of common stock for option exercises

        83      189         189 

Issuance of RSUs to non-employees for services

        36      20         20 

Vesting of employee restricted stock awards

        6      10         10 

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee and director stock options

              334         334 

Stock-based compensation expense related to non-employee and director stock options

              37         37 

Stock option modification

              105         105 

Balance at December 31, 2019

    $   27,938  $279  $125,718  $  $(125,024) $973 
  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Sales:

        

Product revenue, net

 $14,374  $10,180 

Other revenue, net

  30   24 

Total sales, net

  14,404   10,204 
         

Cost of goods sold

  6,623   3,689 

Gross profit

  7,781   6,515 
         

Research and development

  174   44 

Sales and marketing

  7,798   8,093 

General and administrative

  7,489   7,240 

Goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment

  6,737    

Total operating expenses

  22,198   15,377 

Operating loss

  (14,417

)

  (8,862

)

         

Non-cash loss on modification of common stock warrants

  (1,922

)

   

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  5,446   4,615 

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of contingent liability

  561    

Other expense, net

  (276

)

  (1,577

)

         

Net loss

 $(10,608

)

 $(5,824

)

         

Less: Preferred deemed dividend

     735 

Less: Retained earnings reduction related to preferred stock down round feature triggered

  5,657    

Net loss attributable to common stockholders

 $(16,265

)

 $(6,559

)

         
         
         

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (basic and diluted)

 $(10.10

)

 $(5.26

)

Weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding used in computing net loss per share of common stock (basic and diluted)

  1,610   1,247 

As the Company adopted the requirements of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 2.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWSSTOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

(in thousands)

 

  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 
             

Operating activities:

            

Net loss

 $(9,658) $(6,545) $(7,403)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

            

Depreciation and amortization

  65   266   95 

Impairment of property and equipment

  32       

Loss on disposal of property and equipment

  3   1    

Impairment of operating lease right-of-use assets

  125       

Stock-based compensation expense for options and stock issued to employees and directors

  334   594   1,867 

Stock-based compensation expense for options and stock issued to non-employees

  37      137 

Stock option modification expense

  105   77   504 

Issuance of RSUs to employees

  10       

Issuance of RSUs related to employee separation agreement

  220       

Issuance of RSUs to non-employees for services

  20      34 

Non-cash (gain) loss on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  (749)  (1,311)  101 

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of embedded derivative liability

  (424)      

Interest expense related to amortization of debt issuance and debt discount

  670       

Interest expense related to amortization of debt issuance related to related party notes payable

  18       

Issuance of warrants for services

  59       

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

            

Accounts receivable

  2,319   774   (1,509)

Inventory

  (212)  198   369 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  888   (97)  313 

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  861       

Other assets

  9   62   (73)

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  (1,800)  516   (260)

Operating lease liabilities

  (1,066)      

Deferred rent

     (69)  27 

Deferred revenue

  (41)  (34)  (472)

Related party notes payable

  204       

Long-term obligations

  42       

Net cash used in operating activities

  (7,929)  (5,568)  (6,270)
             

Investing activities:

            

Purchases of property and equipment

  (19)  (44)  (244)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (19)  (44)  (244)
             

Financing activities:

            

Proceeds from preferred stock issuances, net

  2,598       

Proceeds from common stock issuances, net

  6,698   5,585    

Proceeds from issuance of related party notes payable

  1,000       

Proceeds from exercise of options, net

  189   11   185 

Proceeds from stock options & RSUs sold to cover taxes

  4   1   26 

Proceeds from exercise of warrants

  67      38 

Settlement of restricted stock for tax withholding

        (48)

Proceeds from convertible notes, net of discount

  2,000       

Payment on the convertible note

  (652)      

Debt issuance cost

  (202)      

Net cash provided by financing activities

  11,702   5,597   201 

Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

  3,754   (15)  (6,313)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year

  3,658   3,673   9,986 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year

 $7,412  $3,658  $3,673 
                  

Additional

      

Total

 
  

Preferred Stock

  

Common Stock

  

Paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

Stockholders'

 
  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Shares

  

Amount

  

Capital

  

Deficit

  

Equity

 

Balance at December 31, 2020

    $   1,194  $418  $147,963  $(136,063

)

 $12,318 

Net loss

                 (5,824

)

  (5,824

)

Issuance of warrants in connection with the TLF Warrants

              13      13 

Issuance of common stock, net of offering costs

        76   27   1,749      1,776 

Vesting of employee restricted stock awards

        5   2   (2

)

      

Issuance of RSUs to non-employees for services

        9   3   217      220 

Issuance of Series B Preferred Stock and common stock warrants, net of offering costs

  15   735               735 

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to common stock

  (1

)

  (55

)

  81   28   27       

Beneficial conversion feature upon Issuance of Series B Preferred Stock

              735      735 

Deemed dividend from beneficial Conversion feature of Series B Preferred Stock

              (735

)

     (735

)

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee and director stock options

              693      693 

Stock-based compensation expense related to non-employee stock options

              240      240 

Balance at December 31, 2021

  14  $680   1,365  $478  $150,900  $(141,887

)

 $10,171 

Net loss

                 (10,608

)

  (10,608

)

Reclassification of Series B Private Placement Warrants

              7,502      7,502 

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to common stock

  (2

)

  (110

)

  161   56   54       

Vesting of director restricted stock awards

        3   1   (1

)

      

Issuance of common stock in connection with exercise of warrants, net of offering costs

        328   115   171      286 

Shares issued for reverse stock split due to rounding feature

        19             

Reclassification of equity to liability related to 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction (see Note 14)

              (3,825

)

     (3,825

)

Modification of common stock warrants

              1,922      1,922 

Down round feature adjustment related to Series B Preferred Stock

              5,657   (5,657)   

Reclassification of Private Placement Warrants

              1,851      1,851 

Issuance of Series C Preferred Stock, net of offering costs

  3   2,054               2,054 

Issuance of common stock A-1 warrants, net of offering costs

     176               176 

Issuance of common stock A-2 warrants, net of offering costs

     805               805 

Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock to common stock

  (1)  (632)  159   2   630       

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee and director stock options

              220      220 

Balance at December 31, 2022

  14  $2,973   2,035  $652  $165,081  $(158,152

)

 $10,554 

  

Year ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

            

Interest paid

 $148  $  $ 
Income taxes paid $14  $14  $ 

37

  

Year ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:

            

Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 606

 $  $2,638  $ 

Cumulative effect of adoption of ASU 2017-11

 $56  $  $ 

Addition of operating lease, right-of-use asset

 $2,473  $  $ 

Stock issued to consultants for services, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 $  $  $1 

Fixed asset purchases, included in accounts payable and accrued liabilities

 $10  $(49) $(49)

Warrant liability transferred to equity

 $553  $  $58 

Fair value of warrants issued in connection with financings

 $5,269  $  $ 

Severance paid in RSU to non-employee

 $  $  $69 

Conversion of preferred stock to common stock

 $584  $  $ 

Reclassification of EmeryStation lease security deposit from long term to short term

 $65  $  $ 

Reclassification of EmeryStation sublease security deposit from long term to short term

 $198  $  $ 

As the Company adopted the requirements of ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), as of January 1, 2019, using the modified retrospective method, there is a lack of comparability to the prior periods presented. See Note 2.

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

  

Year ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 
         

Operating activities:

        

Net loss

 $(10,608

)

 $(5,824

)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

        

Depreciation of property and equipment

  120   59 

Amortization of intangible assets

  363   60 

Impairment of goodwill, intangible and other assets

  6,737    

Impairment of property, plant and equipment

  66    

Stock-based compensation expense related to employee and director stock options

  220   693 

Stock-based compensation expense related to non-employee stock options

     240 

Issuance of RSUs to non-employees for services

     220 

Issuance of warrants in connection with the TLF Warrants

     13 

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of warrant liability

  (5,446

)

  (4,615

)

Non-cash gain on changes in fair value of contingent liability

  (561

)

   

Non-cash loss on modification of common stock warrants

  1,922    

Changes in operating assets and liabilities:

        

Accounts receivable

  (305

)

  452 

Inventory

  (217

)

  (243

)

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  218   (52

)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  (1,420

)

  25 

Other assets

  (5

)

   

Accounts payable and accrued liabilities

  667   (163

)

Operating lease liabilities

  1,595   (57

)

Net cash used in operating activities

  (6,654

)

  (9,192

)

         

Investing activities:

        

Acquisition, net of cash

     (11,993

)

Purchases of property and equipment

  (112

)

  (52

)

Net cash used in investing activities

  (112

)

  (12,045

)

         

Financing activities:

        

Proceeds from Series B Preferred Stock issuances, net

     14,908 

Proceeds from Series C Preferred Stock and warrant issuances, net

  3,035    

Proceeds from common stock issuances, net

     1,776 

Proceeds from exercise of warrants

  1,703    

Draws (payments) on the line of credit

  (105)  105 

Net cash provided by financing activities

  4,633   16,789 

Net (decrease) increase in cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash

  (2,133

)

  (4,448)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, beginning of year

  7,979   12,427 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash, end of year

 $5,846  $7,979 

  

For the Years ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

        

Interest paid

 $17  $ 

Income taxes paid

 $24  $21 

  

For the Years ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Supplemental disclosure of non-cash information:

        

Warrant liability transferred to equity related to warrant modification

 $9,353  $ 

Equity transferred to warrant liability related to warrant modification

 $3,825  $ 

Addition of operating lease, right-of-use asset

 $2,039  $376 

Fair value of warrants issued in connection with financings

 $  $14,172 

Conversion of Series B Preferred Stock to common stock

 $110  $55 

Conversion of Series C Preferred Stock to common stock

 $632  $ 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

NOVABAY PHARMACEUTICALS, INC.

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

 

NOTE 1.ORGANIZATION

 

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (the “Company”) develops and sells scientifically-created and clinically-proven eyecare, skincare and wound care products. Our leading product, Avenova® Antimicrobial Lid and Lash Solution, or Avenova Spray, is a biopharmaceutical company focusing on commercializingproven in laboratory testing to have broad antimicrobial properties as it removes foreign material including microorganisms and developing its non-antibiotic anti-infectivedebris from the skin around the eye, including the eyelid. Avenova Spray is formulated with our proprietary, stable and pure form of hypochlorous acid and is cleared by the FDA for sale in the United States. Avenova Spray is available direct to consumers primarily through online distribution channels and is also available by prescription and dispensed by eyecare professionals for blepharitis and dry-eye disease. Other eyecare products to addressoffered under the unmet therapeutic needs of the global, topical anti-infective market with its two distinct product categories: the NEUTROX® family of productsAvenova eyecare brand include Novawipes by Avenova, Avenova Lubricant Eye Drops, Avenova Moist Heating Eye Compress, and the AGANOCIDE® compounds. i-Chek eyelid and eyelash mirror by Avenova.

Through our subsidiary DERMAdoctor, LLC, the Company offers over 30 dermatologist-developed products targeting common skin concerns, ranging from aging and blemishes to dry skin, perspiration and keratosis pilaris. DERMAdoctor branded products are marketed and sold through the DERMAdoctor website, well-known traditional and digital beauty retailers, and a network of international distributors.

The Neutrox familyCompany also manufactures and sells its proprietary form of products includes AVENOVA® for the eye care market, NEUTROPHASE®hypochlorous acid for the wound care market through our NeutroPhase and CELLERX®PhaseOne branded products. NeutroPhase and PhaseOne are used for the aesthetic dermatology market.cleansing and irrigation as part of surgical procedures, as well as treating certain wounds, burns, ulcers and other injuries. The Aganocide compounds have target applications in the dermatology and urology markets but are still in a clinical phase and not yet commercially available.Company currently sells these products through distributors.

 

The Company was incorporated under the laws of the State of California on January 19, 2000, as NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. It had no operations until July 1, 2002, on which date it acquired all of the operating assets of NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, LLC, a California limited liability company. In February 2007, it changed its name from NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. to NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. In June 2010, the Company changed the state in which it was incorporated (the “Reincorporation”) and is now incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. All references to “the Company” herein refer to the California corporation prior to the date of the Reincorporation and to the Delaware corporation on and after the date of the Reincorporation. In April 2016, theThe Company dissolved DermaBay, a wholly-owned U.S. subsidiary that was formed to explore dermatological opportunities. Historically, the Company operated as four business segments. At the direction of its Board of Directors, the Company is now focused primarily on commercializing Avenova for managing hygiene of the eyelids and lashes in the United States and is managed as a single segment.two reportable segments: (1) Optical and Wound Care and (2) Skin Care.

 

Effective December 18, 2015, November 15, 2022, the Company effected a 1-for-251-for-35 reverse split of itsour outstanding common stock (the “Reverse(“Reverse Stock Split”) (See Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity” for further details)The accompanying financial statementsExcept as otherwise specifically noted, all share numbers, share prices, exercise/conversion prices and related notes giveper share amounts have been adjusted, on a retroactive effectbasis, to the Reverse Stock Split.reflect this 1-for-35 reverse stock split.

 

LiquidityGoing Concern

 

Based primarily on the funds available at December 31, 2019, the Company believes these resources will be sufficient to fund its operations into the second quarter of 2020. The Company has sustained operating losses for the majority of its corporate history and expects that its 20202023 expenses will exceed its 20202023 revenues, as the Company continues to re-investinvest in both its Avenova and DERMAdoctor commercialization efforts. TheAdditionally, the Company expects to continue incurring operating losses and negative cash flows until revenues reach a level sufficient to support ongoing growth and operations. Accordingly, the Company'sCompany has determined that its planned operations raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Additionally, changing circumstances may cause the Company to expend cash significantly faster than currently anticipated, and the Company may need to spend more cash than currently expected because of circumstances beyond its control that impact the broader economy such as periods of inflation, supply chain issues, the continuation of the COVID-19 pandemic and international conflicts (e.g., the conflict between Russia and Ukraine).

The Company'sCompany’s long-term liquidity needs will be largely determined by the success of operations in regardcommercialization efforts. To address the Company’s current liquidity and capital needs, the Company has and continues to the commercialization of Avenova. The Company also may consider otherevaluate different plans and strategic transactions to fund operations, including: (1)(1) raising additional capital through debt and equity financings or from other sources; (2) reducing spending on operations, including reducing spending on one or more of its sales and marketing programs or restructuring operations to change its overhead structure; (3) out-licensing rights to certain of its products or product candidates, pursuant to which the Company would receive cash milestones or an upfront fee; (2) raising additional capital through debt and equity financings or from other sources; (3) reducing spending on one or more of its sales and marketing programs; and/or (4) restructuring operations(4) entering into license agreements to change its overhead structure.sell new products. The Company may issue securities, including common stock, preferred stock, convertible debt securities and warrants through additional private placement transactions or registered public offerings, which would may require the filing of a Form S-1S-1 or Form S-3S-3 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC"). In the absence of the Company's completion of one or more of such transactions, there will be substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date these financial statements are issued, and the Company will be required to scale back or terminate operations and/or seek protection under applicable bankruptcy laws.SEC. The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming the Company will continue to operate as a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and the settlement of liabilities in the normal course of business. TheThese consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts of liabilities that may result from uncertainty related to its ability to continue as a going concern.

 

 

 

NOTE 2. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States ("(“U.S. GAAP"GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates include contract liabilities related to product sales, useful lives for property and equipment and related depreciation calculations, estimated amortization periods for payments received from product development and license agreements as they relate to revenue recognition, assumptions for valuing options and warrants, the fair value of contingent consideration, intangible assets, goodwill, stock-based compensation, income taxes and income taxes.other contingencies.

These estimates are based on management’s best estimates and judgment. Actual results could may differ from thosethese estimates. Estimates, judgments, and assumptions are continuously evaluated and are based on management’s experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Uncertainty about these assumptions, judgments and estimates could result in outcomes that require a material adjustment to the carrying amount of assets or liabilities affected in future periods.

 

Change in Accounting and Revision of Prior Period Financial Statements

During the third quarter of 2022, the Company made an accounting policy change election related to fulfillment fees paid to third-party online retailers such as Amazon. The Company began expensing these fees as incurred as product cost of goods sold in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company previously recorded revenue net of these fees. The Company believes that making this change is appropriate and preferable as it is more consistent with the practices of comparable companies as the Company increasingly focus on commercial growth in our direct to consumer on-line channels. Changes to prior period amounts presented in this report have been made to conform to the current period presentation. See additional information under “Revenue Recognition” below. The changes had no impact on operating loss, net loss or net loss per share in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual and quarterly financial statements. The changes also did not impact cash or ending cash balances in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual and quarterly financial statements.

While reviewing its accounting policy for fulfillment fees during the third quarter of 2022, the Company identified an error in its previously issued financial statements whereby the Company had been incorrectly presenting revenue net of selling commissions paid to third-party online retailers. For the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company concluded that these commissions relate to a sales activity and began expensing them as incurred as sales and marketing expenses within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The identified error impacted the Company’s previously issued 2022first and second quarter financial statements, as well as the 2021 annual financial statements. Management believes that the impact of these adjustments to correct such error is immaterial to the previously issued consolidated financial statements, based on an evaluation of both quantitative and qualitative factors. However, revisions to prior period amounts presented in this report have been made to conform to the current period presentation. See additional information under “Revenue Recognition” below. The revisions had no impact on operating loss, net loss or net loss per share in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual consolidated financial statements. The changes also did not impact cash or ending cash balances in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual consolidated financial statements.

Cash, and Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash

 

The Company considers all highly-liquid instruments with a stated maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash and cash equivalents are stated at cost, which approximates fair value. As of December 31, 2019, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held in a highly-rated, major financial institution in the United States. As of December 31, 2018, the Company’s cash and cash equivalents were held in two highly-rated, major financial institutions in the United States.

 

37

The following table provides a reconciliation of the cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported in the consolidated balance sheets that sum to the total of the same reported in the consolidated statements of cash flows:(in thousands):

 

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $6,937  $3,183 

Restricted cash included in Other assets

  475   475 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in the statements of cash flows

 $7,412  $3,658 
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Cash and cash equivalents

 $5,362  $7,504 

Restricted cash included in other assets

  484   475 

Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash in the consolidated statements of cash flows

 $5,846  $7,979 

 

The restricted cash amount included in Otherother assets on the consolidated balance sheets representrepresents amounts held as certificates of deposit for long-term financing and lease arrangements as contractually required by our financial institution and landlord.

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk and Major Partners and Customers, and Suppliers

 

Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and cash equivalents.restricted cash. The Company maintains deposits of cash, and cash equivalents and restricted cash with a highly-rated, major financial institution in the United States.

 

Deposits in this bank mayThe Company has significant cash balances at financial institutions which throughout the year regularly exceed the amountfederally insured limit of federal insurance provided$250,000. Any loss incurred or a lack of access to such funds could have a significant adverse impact on such deposits. The Company does not believe it is exposed to significant credit risk due to the Company's financial positioncondition, results of the financial institution in which the deposits are held.operations, and cash flows.

 

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, revenues were derived primarily from sales of Avenova directly to doctors through the Company’s webstore,branded products, directly to consumers through Amazon.com, and to pharmacies via three major distribution partnersAvenova.com. Revenues in the 2022 and specialty pharmacies. 2021 fiscal years also included sales of DERMAdoctor branded products (with 2021 revenue only including revenue from DERMAdoctor branded products beginning at the closing of the DERMAdoctor Acquisition).

During the years ended December 31, 2018 2022 and 2017,2021, revenues from significant product categories were derived primarily fromas follows (in thousands):

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Avenova Spray

 $7,651  $8,565 

DERMAdoctor

  4,155   649 

NeutroPhase

  976   368 

Other products

  1,592   598 

Total product revenue, net

  14,374   10,180 

Other revenue, net

  30   24 

Total sales, net

 $14,404  $10,204 

During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, sales of Avenova directly to three major distribution partnersSpray via Amazon comprised 73% and to doctors through67%, respectively, of total Avenova Spray net revenue. No other individual distributor comprised greater than 10% of total Avenova Spray net revenue during the Company's webstore.

40

As of years ended December 31, 2019, December 31, 2018 and December 31, 2017, revenues from our major distribution 2022 or collaboration partners greater than 10% were as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Major distribution or collaboration partner

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Distributer A

  16

%

  23

%

  22

%

Distributer B

  17

%

  26

%

  23

%

Distributer C

  15

%

  25

%

  21

%

Collaborator D

  *

%

  *

%

  10

%

Avenova Direct via Amazon

  15

%

  

%

  

%

*Not greater than 10%2021.

 

As of December 31, 2019 2022 and December 31, 2018,2021, accounts receivable from our major distribution or collaboration partners and major retailers greater than 10% were as follows:

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Major distribution or collaboration partner

 

2019

  

2018

 

Distributer A

  28%  32%

Distributer B

  13%  31%

Distributer C

  19%  23%

Avenova Direct via Amazon

  20%  %
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

Major distribution partner

 2022  2021 

Avenova Spray Pharmacy Distributor A

  30

%

  11

%

Major U.S. Retailer A

  15

%

  *

%

Avenova Spray Pharmacy Distributor B

  11

%

  *

%

Major U.S. Retailer B

  *

%

  33

%

Avenova Spray Pharmacy Distributor C

  *

%

  13

%

* Less than 10%

 

The Company relies on twoseven contract sole source manufacturers to produce its finished goods.products. The Company does not have own any manufacturing facilities and intends to continue to rely on third parties for the supply of finished goods. There is a risk however that third partyContract manufacturers may or may not be able to meet the Company’s needs with respect to timing, quantity or quality. In particular, it is possible that the Company may suffer from unexpected delays in light of the global supply chain issues.

 

38

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities

 

The Company’s financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities, related party notes payable, a convertible note,warrant liabilities, and warrants.contingent consideration. The fair value ofCompany’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities and related party notes payable isare carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

 

The Secured Convertible Promissory Note issued on March 26, 2019 (the “Convertible Note”) is carried at cost, which management believes approximates fair value. Additionally, the derivative liability related to certain embedded features contained within the Convertible Note is carried at fair value. The warrant liability is also carried at fair value.

The Company follows ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, with respect to assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis and nonrecurring basis. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants as of the measurement date. The standard also establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs be used when available. Observable inputs are inputs market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based on market data obtained from sources independent of the Company. Unobservable inputs are inputs that reflect the Company’s assumptions about the factors market participants would use in valuing the asset or liability developed based upon the best information available in the circumstances. There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

Level 1 – quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level 2 – quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets or inputs that are observable; and

Level 3 – inputs that are unobservable (for example, cash flow modeling inputs based on assumptions).

 

Categorization within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

 

41

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

 

The Company charges bad debt expense and records an allowance for doubtful accounts when management believes it to be unlikely athat specific invoiceinvoices will be collected. Management identifies amounts due that are in dispute and it believes are unlikely to be collected at the endcollected. As of each reporting period. At December 31, 20192022, management recorded a $19 thousand reserve for allowance for doubtful accounts, and no reserve for allowance for doubtful accounts as of December 31, 2018, management had reserved $51 thousand and $10 thousand, respectively, primarily based on specific amounts that are in dispute or were over 120 days past due.2021.

 

Inventory

 

Inventory is comprised of (1)(1) raw materials and supplies, such as bottles, packaging materials, labels, boxes and pumps; (2)(2) goods in progress, which are normally filled but unlabeled bottles; and (3)(3) finished goods. We utilizeThe Company utilizes contract manufacturers to produce our products and the cost associated with manufacturingprice paid to these manufacturers is included in inventory. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, management had recorded an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory and lower of cost or estimated net realizable value adjustments of $247 thousand and $104 thousand, respectively. 

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value determined by the first-in, first-outfirst-in, first-out method. At December 31, 2022 and 2021, management had recorded an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value of $499 thousand and $641 thousand, respectively. 

 

Property and Equipment, net

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization.depreciation. Depreciation is calculated using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets of five to seven years for office and laboratory equipment, three to five years for computer equipment and software, and five to seven years for furniture and fixtures. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the shorter of seven years or the lease term.

 

The costs of normal maintenance, repairs, and minor replacements are chargedexpensed as incurred. 

Business Combinations

We account forbusiness combinations using the acquisition method of accounting, in accordance with ASC 805,Business Combinations. The acquisition method requires that identifiable assets acquired and liabilities assumed are recognized and measured at fair value on the acquisition date, which is the date that the acquirer obtains control of the acquired business. The amount by which the fair value of consideration transferred as the purchase price exceeds the net fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed is recorded as goodwill.

The determination of estimated fair value requires us to operations whenmake significant estimates and assumptions. These fair value determinations require judgment and involve the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including assumptions with respect to future cash inflows and outflows, discount rates, and asset lives, among other items. As a result, the Company may record adjustments to the fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed within the measurement period (up to one year from the acquisition date) with the corresponding offset to goodwill.

Transaction costs associated with business combinations are expensed as they are incurred.

 

39

ImpairmentGoodwill and Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets

Goodwill represents the excess of Long-Lived Assetsthe consideration transferred over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Intangible assets are measured at their respective fair values as of the acquisition date and may be subject to adjustment within the measurement period, which may be up to one year from the acquisition date. Goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets are tested for impairment annually, or more frequently if events or changes in circumstances indicate that it is more likely than not that the assets are impaired.

Goodwill is evaluated for impairment by first performing a qualitative assessment to determine whether a quantitative goodwill test is necessary. If it is determined, based on qualitative factors, that the fair value of the reporting unit may more likely than not be less than carrying amount, or if significant adverse changes in the Company's future financial performance occur that could materially impact fair value, a quantitative goodwill impairment test would be required. Additionally, management can elect to forgo the qualitative assessment and perform the quantitative test. If the qualitative assessment indicates that the quantitative analysis should be performed, or if management elects to bypass a qualitative assessment, the Company then evaluates goodwill for impairment by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount, including goodwill. The quantitative assessment for goodwill requires management to estimate the fair value of the Company's reporting units using either an income or market approach or a combination thereof.

Management makes critical assumptions and estimates in completing impairment assessments of goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets. The Company's cash flow projections look several years into the future and include assumptions on variables such as future sales and operating margin growth rates, economic conditions, probability of success, market competition, inflation and discount rates.

 

The Company accountsacquired DERMAdoctor in November 2021, and since completing this transaction it has been working to integrate and expand the DERMAdoctor business in order to achieve strategic objectives that the Company expected by completing this acquisition, including revenue growth, cost reductions and achieving overall profitability. The Company has not been able to achieve these objectives in fiscal 2022, as DERMAdoctor’s product revenue declined in 2022 compared to 2021, while operating costs relating to these products increased. In addition, as a result of the performance of the DERMAdoctor business in fiscal 2022, management revised its forecast for the future performance of DERMAdoctor products.

During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis following the steps laid out in ASC 350-20-35-3C. The Company’s annual impairment analysis included a qualitative assessment to determine if it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. In performing the qualitative assessment, the Company reviewed events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine if the fair value is less than the carrying value of goodwill. The Company performed a Step 0 goodwill impairment analysis and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit may more likely than not be less than carrying amount, which necessitated the Company performing the quantitative impairment test. After performing the quantitative impairment test in accordance with ASC 350-20-35-3C, the Company determined that goodwill related to its DERMAdoctor reporting unit was impaired by $4.2 million, as of December 31, 2022, which is reflected in the goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment caption in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The impairment impact on the consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2022 was a $4.2 million reduction to the goodwill caption. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2021.

The Company completed its indefinite-lived intangible asset impairment assessment during the fourth quarter of 2022. The Company evaluated, on the basis of the weight of the evidence, the significance of all identified events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine the fair value of the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets for determining whether it is more likely than not that the Company’s indefinite-lived intangible assets are impaired. After assessing the totality of events and circumstances, and their potential effect on significant inputs to the fair value calculation, the Company determined that it is more likely than not that its indefinite-lived intangible assets related to its DERMAdoctor reporting unit were impaired. As such, the Company performed a quantitative impairment test on its indefinite-lived intangible assets. Based on the quantitative impairment test, the Company determined that its indefinite-lived trade name intangible asset should be impaired by $1.0 million as of December 31, 2022, which is reflected in the goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment caption in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company did not record any indefinite-lived intangible asset impairments during the year ended December 31, 2021.

Valuation of Contingent Consideration Resulting from a Business Combination

In connection with certain acquisitions, including the acquisition of DERMAdoctor, the Company may be required to pay future consideration that is contingent upon the achievement of specified milestone events. The Company records contingent consideration resulting from a business combination at its fair value on the acquisition date. Each quarter thereafter, the Company revalues these obligations and records increases or decreases in the fair value within the consolidated statement of operations until such time as the specified milestone achievement period is complete.

Increases or decreases in fair value of the contingent consideration liabilities can result from updates to assumptions such as the expected timing or probability of achieving the specified milestones. Significant judgment is employed in determining these assumptions as of the acquisition date and for each subsequent period. Updates to assumptions could have a significant impact on the Company’s results of operations in any given period. Actual results may differ from estimates.

As of December 31, 2022, the Company determined that the above-mentioned milestones related to the DERMAdoctor acquisition were not met for the first calendar year of the post-closing earn out and are not expected to be met in the second calendar year of the post-closing earn out, based on projections; therefore, the liability for the potential earn out payments was determined to be zero. As a result, the Company recognized a $0.6 million non-cash gain related to the change in fair value of the contingent consideration for the year then ended December 31, 2022, which is reflected in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations.

40

Long-Lived Assets

The Company’s intangible assets that do not have indefinite lives (primarily trade secrets / product formulations) are amortized over their estimated useful lives. All of the Company’s intangible assets subject to amortization and other long-lived assets, andincluding operating lease right-of-use assets, are reviewed for impairment in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant and Equipment, which requires that companies consider whether events or changes in facts and circumstances, both internally and externally, may indicate that an impairment of long-lived assets held for use or right-of-use assets are present. Management periodically evaluates the carrying value ofThe Company reviews long-lived assets and right-of-use assets.assets for impairment at least annually or whenever events or changes in business circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of the assets may not be fully recoverable or that the useful lives of these assets are no longer appropriate. Determination of recoverability is based on an estimate of undiscounted future cash flows resulting from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition. In the event that such cash flows are not expected to be sufficient to recover the carrying amount of the asset, the assets are written down to their estimated fair values and the loss is recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. During the first quarter of 2019, in

In connection with the restructuringabove-mentioned DERMAdoctor reporting unit impairment, discussed in the goodwill and indefinite-lived intangible assets caption above, the Company determined that certain of its U.S. sales force,DERMAdoctor business definite long-lived intangible assets and property and equipment were also impaired. As such, the Company reviewed its fleet leases for impairment andhas recorded an impairment charge in the year ended December 31, 2022 of $125 thousand,$1.6 million for the impairment of long-lived intangible assets which is reflected in the resultscaption goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations, and of $66 thousand, net for the year ended December 31, 2019. See Note 8, “Commitmentsproperty, plant and Contingencies” for further information regarding the impairment. During the third quarter of 2019, the Company recorded an impairment charge of $32 thousand related to previously capitalized software,equipment which is reflected in the results forgeneral and administrative caption in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. There were no impairment charges during the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.

 

Leases

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842), to enhance the transparency and comparability of financial reporting related to leasing arrangements. The Company adopted the standard effective January 1, 2019. Using the optional transition method, prior period financial statements have not been recast to reflect the new lease standard.

 

At the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease based on the unique facts and circumstances present. Operating lease liabilities and their corresponding right-of-use assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term. The interest rate implicit in lease contracts is typically not readily determinable. As such, the Company utilizes its incremental borrowing rate, which is the rate incurred to borrow, on a collateralized basis over a similar term, at an amount equal to the lease payments in a similar economic environment. Certain adjustments to the right-of-use assets may be required for items such as initial direct costs paid or incentives received.

 

The Company has elected to combine lease and non-lease components as a single component for all leases in which it is a lessee or a lessor. The lease expense is recognized over the expected term on a straight-line basis. Operating leases are recognized on the consolidated balance sheet as right-of-use assets, operating lease liabilities current and operating lease liabilities non-current. As a result,

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized from the sale of goods in accordance with ASC 606,Revenue from Contracts with Customers. Under ASC 606, the Company recognizes revenue when or as the Company’s performance obligations are satisfied by transferring control of the effective date,promised goods to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the Company no longer recognizes deferred rent onexpects to receive. To determine revenue recognition for arrangements that an entity determines are within the balance sheet.scope of ASC 606, the Company performs the following five steps as prescribed by ASC 606:

i.

identify the contract(s) with a customer;

ii.

identify the performance obligations in the contract;

iii.

determine the transaction price;

iv.

allocate the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract; and

v.

recognize revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies performance obligations.

Revenue is generated through the Company’s webstores, Avenova.com and DERMAdoctor.com, for Avenova and DERMAdoctor products. Such direct to consumer sales are recognized upon fulfillment, which generally occurs upon delivery of the related products to a third-party carrier. Shipping and handling costs are expensed as incurred and included in product cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations. The Company presents revenue net of sales taxes and refunds. 

 

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, requires that an entity's change in equity or net assets duringRevenue generated through third-party online retailers, including Amazon, is recognized when control of the goods is transferred to the customer, which generally occurs upon delivery of the products to a period from transactions and other events from non-owner sources be reported. The Company reports unrealized gains and losses on its available-for-sale securities as other comprehensive income (loss).

42

Revenue Recognitionthird-party carrier.

 

The Company pays third-party online retailers advertising & promotion fees, selling commissions and fulfillment fees. Advertising & promotion fees are expensed as incurred as sales and marketing expenses within operating expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Prior to the third quarter of 2022, the Company recorded revenue net of selling commissions and fulfillment fees.  Beginning in the third quarter of 2022, as further described below, the Company began expensing selling commissions as sales and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and fulfillment fees as product cost of goods sold in the consolidated statements of operations.

41

Prior to the third quarter of 2022, to determine its accounting for fulfillment fees, the Company evaluated principal versus agent considerations with respect to the obligation to ship its product to the customer. The Company assessed whether the nature of the Company’s obligation is as a principal in providing the fulfillment service or as an agent in promising to arrange for a third party to provide the fulfillment service. The Company concluded that it is an agent with respect to the shipping service as the Company does not control the service itself and, therefore, its obligation is that of a promise to arrange for the service. This determination involved significant judgement. In accordance with this conclusion, prior to the third quarter of 2022, the Company recorded revenue net of fulfillment fees. Beginning in the third quarter of 2022, the Company made an accounting policy change election, as a practical expedient, to account for the shipping fees as a fulfillment activity and began expensing them as incurred within product cost of goods sold in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. Management believes the resulting accounting changes are preferable as they conform the Company’s practice to a majority of comparable filers and other similar sales channels. Changes to amounts presented for prior periods have been made to conform to these changes. These changes did not impact operating loss, net loss or loss per share in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual consolidated financial statements. The changes also did not impact cash or ending cash balances in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual consolidated financial statements.

Prior to the third quarter of 2022, the Company also recorded revenue net of selling commissions. During the third quarter of 2022, the Company concluded that these commissions relate to a sales activity and began expensing them as incurred as sales and marketing expenses within the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The Company determined that its treatment prior to the third quarter of 2022 was an error. The identified error impacted the Company's previously issued 2022 and 2021 quarterly, and 2021 and 2020 annual financial statements. Management believes that the impact of this error is immaterial to the previously issued consolidated financial statements, based on an evaluation of both quantitative and qualitative factors. However, revisions to prior period amounts presented in this report have been made to conform to the current period presentation as outlined below. The revisions had no impact on operating loss, net loss or net loss per share in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual consolidated financial statements. The changes also did not impact cash or ending cash balances in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets in the periods presented in this report or in previously issued annual consolidated financial statements.

Financial statement line items included in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2021 were adjusted for the above changes as follows (in thousands):

  

For the Year Ended December 31, 2021

 
  

As Previously

Reported

  

Selling

Commissions

  

Fulfillment

Fees

  

As Revised

 

Sales

                

Product revenue, net

 $8,397  $870  $913  $10,180 

Cost of goods sold

                

Cost of goods sold

  2,776   -   913   3,689 

Operating expenses

                

Sales and marketing

  7,223   870   -   8,093 
                 

Net loss

  (5,824

)

  -   -   (5,824

)

                 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders (basic and diluted)

  (5.26

)

  -   -   (5.26

)

The Company also generates productAvenova Spray revenue through product sales to its major pharmacy distribution partners, a limited number of other distributors and via its webstore.partners. Product supply of Avenova Spray is the only performance obligation contained in these arrangements, and the Company recognizes product revenue upon transfer of control to its major distribution partners at the amount of consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to, generally upon shipmentdelivery to the distributor on a "sell-in"“sell-in” basis.

Other revenue is primarily generated through commercial partner agreements with strategic partners for the development and commercialization of the Company's product candidates. The terms of the agreements typically include more than one performance obligation and generally contain non-refundable upfront fees, payments based upon achievement of certain milestones and royalties on net product sales.

In determining the appropriate amount of revenue to be recognized as it fulfills its obligations under its agreements, the Company performs the following steps: (i) identification of the promised goods or services in the contract; (ii) determination of whether the promised goods or services are performance obligations including whether they are distinct in the context of the contract; (iii) measurement of the transaction price, including the constraint on variable consideration; (iv) allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations based on estimated selling prices; and (v) Upon recognition of revenue when (or as) the Company satisfies each performance obligation. 

Performance Obligations

A performance obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good or service to the customer and is the unit of account in ASC Topic 606. The Company's performance obligations include:

Product supply

Exclusive distribution rights in the product territory

Regulatory submission and approval services

Development services

Sample supply

Incremental discounts and product supply prepayments considered material rights to the customer

The Company has optional additional items in contracts, which are considered marketing offers and are accounted for as separate contracts when the customer elects such options. Arrangements that include a promise for future commercial product supply and optional research and development services at the customer's or the Company's discretion are generally considered options. The Company assesses if these options provide a material right to the licensee and if so, such material rights are accounted for as separate performance obligations.

Transaction Price

The Company has both fixed and variable consideration. Under the Company's license arrangements, non-refundable upfront fees are considered fixed, while milestone payments are identified as variable consideration when determining the transaction price. Product supply selling prices are identified as variable consideration subject to the constraint on variable consideration for estimated discounts, rebates, chargebacks and product returns. Funding of research and development activities are considered variable payments until such costs are reimbursed, at which point they are considered fixed. The Company allocates the total transaction price to each performance obligation based on the relative estimated standalone selling prices of the promised goods or services for each performance obligation.

For product supply under the Company's distribution arrangements,sales, contract liabilities are recorded for invoiced amounts that are subject to significant reversal, including product revenue allowances for cash consideration paid to customers for services, discounts, rebate programs, chargebacks, and product returns. Because theThe Company does not have sufficientderives its rate of return and other contract liabilities from historical data to computeand updates its own return rate, the return rate used to estimate the constraint on variable consideration for product returns is based on an average of peer and competitor company historical return rates. The Company updates the return rate assumption quarterly and applies it to the inventory balance that is held at the distributor and has not yet been sold through to the end customer.assumptions quarterly. Payment for product supply is typically due 30 days after control transfers to the customer. At any point in time there is generally one month of inventory in the sales channel, therefore uncertainty surrounding constraints on variable consideration is generally resolved one month from when control is transferred.distributor.

 

At the inceptionRevenue for products sales to Costco is recognized upon transfer of each arrangement that includes milestone payments, the Company evaluates whether the milestones are considered probable of being achieved and estimatescontrol at the amount to be included in the transaction price using the most likely amount method. If it is probableof consideration that a significant revenue reversal would not occur and achievement is in the control of the Company (such as a regulatory submission by the Company), the value of the associated milestone is included in the transaction price. Milestone payments that are not within the control of the Company, such as approvals from regulators, are not considered probable of being achieved until those approvals are received.

43

For arrangements that include sales-based royalties and the license is deemed to be the predominant item to which the royalties relate, the Company recognizes revenue at the later of (a) when the related sales occur, or (b) when the performance obligation to which some or all of the royalty has been allocated has been satisfied (or partially satisfied).

Allocation of Consideration

As part of the accounting for arrangements that contain multiple performance obligations, the Company must develop assumptions that require judgment to determine the stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation identified in the contract. When a contract contains more than one performance obligation, the Company uses key assumptions to determine the stand-alone selling price of each performance obligation. The estimated stand-alone selling prices for distribution rights and material rights for incremental discounts on product supply are calculated using an income approach discounted cash flow model and can include the following key assumptions: forecasted commercial partner sales, product life cycle estimates, costs of product sales, commercialization expenses, annual growth rates and margins, discount rates and probabilities of technical and regulatory success. For all other performance obligations, the Company uses a cost-plus margin approach. The Company allocates the total transaction price to each performance obligation based on the estimated relative stand-alone selling prices of the promised goods or services underlying each performance obligation.   

Timing of Recognition

Significant management judgment is required to determine the level of effort required under an arrangement and the period over which the Company expects to completebe entitled to, generally upon delivery to Costco. Upon recognition of product sales, contract liabilities are recorded for invoiced amounts that are subject to reversal, including discounts and product returns. The Company derives its performance obligations underrate of return from historical data and updates its return rate assumption quarterly. Payment for product supply is typically due 30 days after control transfers to Costco.

Revenue generated through the arrangement. If the Company cannot reasonably estimate when its performance obligations either are completed or become inconsequential, then revenue recognition is deferred until the Company can reasonably make such estimates. Revenue is then recognized over the remaining estimated period of performance using the cumulative catch-up method. RevenueCompany’s partner pharmacies is recognized for products at a point in time and for licenseswhen control of functional intellectual property at the point in time the customer can use and benefit from the license. For performance obligations that are services, revenue is recognized over time proportionateproduct transfers to the costs that the Company has incurred to perform the services using the cost-to-cost input method.

The Company's intellectual property in the form of distribution rights are determined to be distinct from the other performance obligations identified in the arrangements and considered "right to use" licenses which the customer can benefit from at a point in time. The Company recognizes revenues from non-refundable, up-front fees allocated to the license when the license is transferred to the customer, and the customer can use and benefit from the license. end customer.

 

CostRevenue for product sales to other retailers, such as CVS, is generally recognized upon transfer of control to the retailer, which generally occurs upon delivery of the products to a third-party carrier, net of estimated future product returns.

The Company’s accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts, on December 31, 2020 was $1.1 million.

42

CostofGoodsSold

 

Cost of goods sold includes third party-party manufacturing costs, shipping and handling costs,third-party fulfillment fees, and other costs of goodsassociated with products sold. Cost of goods sold also includes any necessary allowance for excess and obsolete inventory along with lower of cost and estimated net realizable value.

 

Research and Development Costs

 

The Company charges research and development costs to expense as incurred. These costs include salaries and benefits for research and development personnel, costs associated with clinical trials managed by contract research organizations, and otherall costs associated with research, development and regulatory activities. Researchactivities, including submissions to the Food and development costs may vary depending on the type of item or service incurred, location of performance or production, level of availability of the item or service, and specificity required in production for certain compounds. The Company uses external service providers to conduct clinical trials, to manufacture supplies of product candidates and to provide various other research and development-related products and services. The Company’s research, clinical and development activities are often performed under agreements it enters into with external service providers. The Company estimates and accrues the costs incurred under these agreements based on factors such as milestones achieved, patient enrollment, estimates of work performed, and historical data for similar arrangements. As actual costs are incurred, the Company adjusts its accruals. Historically, the Company’s accruals have been consistent with management’s estimates and no material adjustments to research and development expenses have been recognized. Subsequent changes in estimates may result in a material change in the Company’s expenses, which could also materially affect its results of operations. Drug Administration (the “FDA”).

 

Patent Costs

 

Patent costs, including legal expenses, are expensed in the period in which they are incurred. Patent expenses are included in general and administrative expenses in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.operations.

 

44

Advertising Costs

 

Advertising costs are expensed in the period in which the costs are incurred. Advertising costs are included in sales and marketing expenses in the consolidated statements of operations. Advertising expenses were $2.0 million and $3.2 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

Stock-Based Compensation

 

The Company’s stock-based compensation includes grants of stock options and RSUs to employees, consultants and non-employee directors. The expense associated with these programsgrants is recognized in the Company’s consolidated statements of stockholders’ equity based on their fair values as they are earned under the applicable vesting terms or the length of an offering period.terms. For stock options granted, the fair value of the stock options is estimated using a Black-Scholes-MertonBlack-Scholes option pricing model. See Note 13,15, “Equity-Based Compensation” for further information regarding stock-based compensation expense and the assumptions used in estimating that expense. The Company accounts for restricted stock unit awardsRSUs issued to employees and non-employees (consultants(directors, consultants and advisory board members) based on the fair market value of the Company’s common stock as of the date of issuance.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. A valuation allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion or the entire deferred tax asset will not be recognized.

 

Common Stock Warrant LiabilitiesWarrants

 

The Company accounts for the issuance of common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with its equity offerings in accordance with the provisions of ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, and ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging.

The Company accounts for common stock purchase warrants issued in connection with share-based compensation arrangements in accordance with the provisions of ASC 718,Stock Compensation, which encompasses the provisions of ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity.

The Company classifies as equity any contracts that (i) require physical settlement or net-share settlement or (ii) give the Company a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in its own shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). The Company classifies as assets or liabilities any contracts that (i) require net-cash settlement (including a requirement to net-cash settle the contract if an event occurs and if that event is outside the control of the Company) or, (ii) give the counterparty a choice of net-cash settlement or settlement in shares (physical settlement or net-share settlement). or (iii) do not become exercisable until the occurrence of a contingent event. Additionally, for common stock purchase warrants accounted for in accordance with ASC 718,Stock Compensation, the Company classifies as liabilities any contracts where it believes the warrants are deemed to be probable of issuance.

For warrants that are classified as liabilities, the Company records the fair value of the warrants at each balance sheet date and records changes in the estimated fair value as a non-cash gain or loss in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.operations. The fair values of these warrants have beenare determined using the Black-Scholes valuation method oroption pricing model, the Binomial Lattice (“Lattice”) valuation model, or the Monte Carlo simulation model where deemed appropriate. These values are subject to a significant degree of the Company’smanagement’s judgment.

 

On January 1, 2019, the Company adopted ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815): I. Accounting for Certain Financial Instruments with Down Round Features; II. Replacement

43

Net Loss per Share

 

The Company computes net loss per share by presenting both basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share ("EPS"(“EPS”).

 

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholdersstockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period, including stock options and warrants, using the treasury stock method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used to determine the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Potentially dilutive common share equivalents are excluded from the diluted EPS computation in net loss periods becauseif their effect would be anti-dilutive.

 

DuringFor the yearyears ended December 31, 2019, both basic 2022 and diluted EPS2021, the Preferred Stock was aexcluded from the computation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion on an “if converted” basis would have been anti-dilutive.  For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Preferred Stock was considered anti-dilutive as a result of $0.48 per share.such securities not having a contractual obligation to participate in losses of the Company.

45

 

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic EPS and diluted EPS (in thousands, except per share amounts):

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Numerator

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Net loss

 $(9,658) $(6,545) $(7,403)

Less: Preferred deemed dividend

  800       

Less: Retained earnings reduction related to warrants down round feature triggered

  29       

Net loss attributable to common stockholders, basic

  (10,487)  (6,545)  (7,403)

Less gain on changes in fair value of warrant liability

     1,311    

Net loss attributable to common stockholders, diluted

 $(10,487) $(7,856) $(7,403)
             

Denominator

            

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic

  21,641   16,921   15,324 

Net loss per share, basic

 $(0.48) $(0.39) $(0.48)
             

Weighted average shares outstanding, basic

  21,641   16,921   15,324 

Effect of dilutive warrants

     137    

Weighted average shares outstanding, diluted

  21,641   17,058   15,324 

Net loss per share, diluted

 $(0.48) $(0.46) $(0.48)

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Numerator

        

Net loss

 $(10,608

)

 $(5,824

)

Less: Preferred deemed dividend

     735 

Less: Retained earnings reduction related to preferred stock down round feature triggered

  5,657    

Net loss attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted

 $(16,265

)

 $(6,559

)

         

Denominator

        

Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding, basic and diluted

  1,610   1,247 

Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted

 $(10.10

)

 $(5.26

)

 

The following outstanding stock options and stock warrants were excluded from the diluted EPS computation as their effect would have been anti-dilutive:anti-dilutive (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

 
 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
 

(in thousands)

  

2022

  2021 

Stock options

  2,183   3,374   2,960  132  127 

Stock warrants

  8,588      544   2,306   202 
  10,771   3,374   3,504   2,438   329 

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

SEC Disclosure Regulation Simplifications

During the fourth quarter of 2018 and first quarter of 2019, the SEC published Final Rule Release No. 33-10532, “Disclosure Update and Simplification” and Final Rule Release No. 33-10618, “Fast Act Modernization and Simplification of Regulation S-K.” These standards, effective for quarterly and annual reports, streamline disclosure requirements by removing certain redundant topics. For the Company, the most notable standard implemented herein is the removal of comparative information for fiscal years December 31, 2018 and 2017 in the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations of this Form 10-K.

Leases

In February 2016, August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02,2020-06, Leases (Topic 842)Debt, which replaced the prior guidance for leases. The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU assetDebt with Conversion and a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. Disclosure requirements have been enhanced with the objective of enabling financial statement users to assess the amount, timing,Other Options (Subtopic 470-20) and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. ASU 2016-02 became effective for the Company beginning in the first quarter of 2019. The Company has implemented the standard using an optional transition method that allows the Company to initially apply the new leases standard as of the adoption date and recognize a cumulative-effect adjustment to the opening balance of accumulated deficit, if applicable, in the period of adoption. In connection with the adoption, the Company has elected to utilize the package of practical expedients, including not reassessing: (1) the lease classification for any expired or existing leases, (2) the treatment of initial direct costs as they relate to existing leases, and (3) whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases. The Company also elected the practical expedient not to separate lease and non-lease components of its operating leases in which it is the lessee.

46

The adoption of the new leases standard resulted in the following adjustments to the consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019 (in thousands):

Prepaid expenses and other current assets (a)

 $(49)

Operating lease right-of-use assets

  2,239 

Other assets (b)

  (2)

Other accrued liabilities (c)

  (101)

Operating lease liability

  1,063 

Deferred rent

  (184)

Operating lease liability - non-current

  1,410 

(a)

Represents current portion of prepaid fleet leasing costs reclassified to operating lease right-of-use assets.

(b)

Represents noncurrent portion of prepaid fleet leasing costs reclassified to operating lease right-of-use assets.

(c)

Represents current portion of deferred rent and lease incentive liability reclassified to operating lease liability.

The adoption of the new leases standard did not impact previously reported financial results because the Company applied the optional transition method and therefore all adjustments were reflected as of January 1, 2019, the date of adoption.

 In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), Derivatives and Hedging (Topic Contracts in Entitys Own Equity (Subtopic 815-40): I. Accounting for Certain FinancialConvertible Instruments with Down Round Features and II. Replacement of the Indefinite Deferral for Mandatorily Redeemable Financial Instruments of Certain Nonpublic Entities and Certain Mandatorily Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests with a Scope Exception.Contracts in an Entity Part I applies to entities that issue financial instruments such as warrants, convertible debt or convertible preferred stock that contain down round features. Part II simply replaces the indefinite deferral for certain mandatorily redeemable noncontrolling interests and mandatorily redeemable financial instruments of nonpublic entities contained within ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities froms Own Equity (“ASC 480”ASU 2020-06”), with a scope exception and does not impact. ASU 2020-06 simplifies the accounting for these mandatorily redeemable instruments.convertible instruments by removing the separation models for (1) convertible debt with a cash conversion feature and (2) convertible instruments with a beneficial conversion feature. As a result, a convertible debt instrument will be accounted for as a single liability measured at its amortized cost. ASU 2017-112020-06 also requires the application of the if-converted method for calculating diluted earnings per share and the treasury stock method will be no longer available. The new guidance is effective for public companies for the annual reporting periodsfiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those annual periods. 2021, with early adoption permitted no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company adopted ASU 2017-11 on a modified retrospective basis effective January 1, 2019. Upon adoption of ASU 2017-11, the Company changed its method of accounting for warrants by reclassifying warrant liabilities related to outstanding warrants that have a down round feature to additional paid-in capital on its March 31, 2019 consolidated balance sheets, and recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment to the Company’s beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2019 (see Note 11, “Warrant Liability”).

In June 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment Accounting. ASU 2018-07 aligns the measurement and classification guidance for share-based payments to nonemployees with the guidance for share-based payments to employees, with certain exceptions. Under the new standard, equity-classified share-based payment awards issued to nonemployees will be measured on the grant date, instead of the current requirement to remeasure the awards through the performance completion date. The Company adopted ASU 2018-07 effective January 1, 2019, and this guidance had an approximately $2 thousand impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement. ASU 2018-13 improved the effectiveness of disclosure requirements for recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The standard removes, modifies, and adds certain disclosure requirements. The Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2020 2022, and does not expect the adoption of this guidance todid not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,2016-13, Financial Instruments—InstrumentsCredit Losses (Topic 326)326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments(“ASU 2016-13”). The amendments in ASU 2016-132016-13 require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. ASU 2016-132016-13 is effective for the Company for annual and interim reporting periods beginning January 1, 2020. 2023. The Company will adopt the new standard effective January 1, 2023. We areThe Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on ourits consolidated financial statements.

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (ASU 2019-12), which simplifies the accounting for income taxes. This guidance will be effective for us in the first quarter of 2021 on a prospective basis. We are currently evaluating the impact of the new guidance on our consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

NOTE 3. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS BUSINESS COMBINATION

On November 5, 2021, the Company completed the DERMAdoctor Acquisition in which NovaBay acquired 100% of the membership units of DERMAdoctor from the sellers for a closing purchase price of $12.0 million and potential future earnout payments of up to an aggregate of $3.0 million over a period of two calendar years post-closing.

 

The Company followsfunded the closing purchase price in part through the 2021 Private Placement (see Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity”).

The DERMAdoctor Acquisition is accounted for as a business combination in accordance with ASC 820,805, Fair Value Measurements and DisclosuresBusiness Combinations, with respect towhich requires that the assets acquired and liabilities that are measuredassumed be recognized at their estimated fair value on a recurring basis and nonrecurring basis. Under this standard, fair value is defined as the exit price, or the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participantsvalues as of the measurement date. Acquisition Closing. Goodwill represents the excess of the consideration transferred over the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination.

 

The Company'sfollowing table sets forth the final allocation of the purchase price for the DERMAdoctor Acquisition to the fair value of the identifiable tangible and intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed from DERMAdoctor (in thousands):

  

Fair Value

 

Tangible net assets and liabilities:

    

Cash and cash equivalents

 $12 

Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts

  1,015 

Inventory, net of allowance

  2,369 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  150 

Property and equipment, net

  62 

Other intangible assets

  54 

Accounts payable

  (200

)

Accrued liabilities

  (683

)

Total net assets

  2,779 

Intangible Assets:

    

Customer relationships

  290 

Trade secrets / product formulations

  2,890 

Trade names

  2,080 

Total intangible assets

  5,260 

Net assets acquired

  8,039 

Purchased consideration

  12,561 

Goodwill

 $4,528 

Goodwill was primarily attributable to assembled workforce, expected synergies and other factors.

The fair values of the identifiable intangible assets acquired at the date of the DERMAdoctor Acquisition are as follows (in thousands):

Intangible Asset

 

Fair Value

  

Useful Life

(in years)

  

Amortization

Method

 

Customer relationships

 $290   7  

Straight line

 

Trade secrets / product formulations

  2,890   9  

Straight line

 

Trade names

  2,080  

Indefinite

   N/A 

Goodwill

  4,528  

Indefinite

   N/A 
  $9,788         

The valuations of intangible assets incorporate significant unobservable inputs and require significant judgment and estimates, including the amount and timing of future cash equivalentsflows.

The Company recognized approximately $1.2 million of transaction costs in the year ended December 31, 2021. These costs were recorded as general and investmentsadministrative expense in the consolidated statements of operations.

The Company’s management reviews financial results and manages the business on an aggregate basis in accordance with ASC 280,Segment Reporting. Therefore, financial results are reported in two operating segments: (1) Optical & Wound Care and (2) Skin Care (see Note 20,Segment Reporting, for further details).

NOTE 4. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

The Company’s cash equivalents are classified within Level 1 or Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy because they are valued using quoted market prices in active markets, broker or dealer quotations, or alternative pricing sources with reasonable levels of price transparency. The types of investments that are generally classified within Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy include money market securities and certificates of deposit. The types

As of investments that are generallyDecember 31, 2021, the November 2021 Warrants (as described in Note 14,Stockholders Equity) were classified within Level 23 of the fair value hierarchy include corporate securitiesas liabilities (see Note 13, “Warrant Liability” and U.S. government securities.

Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity”). As of December 31, 2019, 2022, the Company’s warrants consist of warrants to purchase the Company’s common stock issued in July 2011, March 2015, October 2015, June 2019 and August 2019, out of which the warrants issued in July 2011, October 2015 and August 2019 are classified as liabilities. March 2015 and June 2019 warrants are considered to be indexed to the Company’s stock and are therefore classified in equity. The Company'sCompany no longer had a warrant liability is classified within Level 3 ofas the fair value hierarchy because the value is calculated using significant judgment based on the Company’s own assumptions in the valuation of this liability. The Company determined the fair value of the warrant liability using the Black-Scholes valuation method or the Lattice valuation model where deemed appropriate. See Note 11, “Warrant Liability” for further discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the warrant liability.

As a result of the call option and the put feature within the Convertible Note, the Company recorded a derivative liability on its consolidated balance sheet with a corresponding debt discount which is netted against the face value of the Convertible Note. The fair value of embedded derivative liability is classified within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy because the value is calculated using significant judgment based on the Company’s own assumptions in the valuation of this liability. The Company determined the fair value of the embedded derivative liability using the Monte Carlo simulation model. See Note 10, “Convertible Note” for further discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the embedded derivative liability.amount was reclassed to equity.

 

The following table presents the Company'sCompany’s cash equivalent assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2019:2022 (in thousands):

 

      

Fair Value Measurements Using

 

 

 

Balance at

  

Quoted Prices in

  

Significant

  

Significant

 
  

December 31,

  

Active Markets

  

Other

  

Unobservable

 
(in thousands) 

2019

  

for Identical

  

Observable

  

Inputs

 
      

Items

  

Inputs

  

(Level 3)

 
      

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

     

Assets

                

Restricted cash held as a certificate of deposit

 $324  $324  $  $ 

Deposit held as a certificate of deposit

  151   151       

Total assets

 $475  $475  $  $ 
                 

Liabilities

                

Warrant liability

 $4,089  $  $  $4,089 

Embedded derivative liability

  3         3 

Total liabilities

 $4,092  $  $  $4,092 
      Fair Value Measurements Using 
      Quoted       
      Prices in       
      Active  Significant    
      Markets  Other  Significant 
   Balance at   

for Identical

  

Observable

    Unobservable 
    December 31,  

Items

  

Inputs

  

Inputs

 
    2022  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

 

Assets

                

Restricted cash held as a certificate of deposit

 $332  $332  $  $ 

Deposit held as a certificate of deposit

  152   152       

Total assets

 $484  $484  $  $ 

 

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities and assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) as of December 31, 2022 (in thousands):

Fair value of warrant liability at December 31, 2021

 $9,558 

Decrease in fair value of November 2021 Warrants

  (2,056

)

Reclassification of November 2021 Warrants liability to equity

  (7,502

)

Fair value of warrants issued in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction (see Note 14)

  5,241 

Decrease in fair value of warrants issued in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction (see Note 14)

  (3,390

)

Reclassification of September 2022 Warrants liability to equity

  (1,851

)

Fair value of warrant liability at December 31, 2022

 $ 
     

Fair value of contingent liability at December 31, 2021

 $561 

Decrease in fair value of contingent liability

  (561

)

Fair value of contingent liability at December 31, 2022

 $ 

46

The following table presents the Company'sCompany’s cash equivalent assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2018:2021 (in thousands):

 

  

Fair Value Measurements Using

 
  

Balance at

  

Quoted Prices in

  

Significant

  

Significant

 
  

December 31,

  

Active Markets

  

Other

  

Unobservable

 

(in thousands)

 

2018

  

for Identical

  

Observable

  

Inputs

 
      

Items

  

Inputs

  

(Level 3)

 
      

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

     

Assets

                

Cash equivalents

 $103  $103  $  $ 

Restricted cash held as a certificate of deposit

  324   324       

Deposit held as a certificate of deposit

  151   151       

Total assets

 $578  $578  $  $ 
                 

Liabilities

                

Warrant liability

 $178  $  $  $178 

Total liabilities

 $178  $  $  $178 

48

Upon adoption of ASU 2017-11, effective January 1, 2019, the Company reclassified 210,586 warrants from warrant liabilities to equity, and the Company is no longer required to record the change in fair values for these instruments, resulting in $56 thousand of the fair value of the warrant liabilities being reclassified to stockholders’ equity. 334,109 July 2011 and October 2015 warrants continued to be classified as a liability as of January 1, 2019, out of which 158,400 warrants were exercised in the second quarter of 2019 and 102,602 warrants were exercised in the third quarter of 2019, with 73,107 July 2011 and October 2015 warrants remaining outstanding as of December 31, 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net change in fair value associated with the July 2011 and October 2015 warrants was a decrease of $88 thousand, of which $465 thousand is reported in the Company’s consolidated statement of operations as a loss from the change in fair value of warrant liabilities and approximately $553 thousand as a reclassification of the fair value of the warrant liabilities to stockholders’ equity in connection with the exercise of the warrants. In August 2019, the Company issued a total of 7,066,508 warrants to purchase 7,066,508 shares of the Company’s common stock in two security offerings. The Company recorded $5.3 million of warranty liabilities upon issuance of these warrants. For the year ended December 31, 2019, the net change in fair value associated with these warrants resulted in a gain of $1.2 million. See Note 11, “Warranty Liability” for further discussion of the calculation of the fair value of the warrant liability.

      Fair Value Measurements Using 
   Balance at  Quoted  Significant  Significant 
   December 31,  Prices in  Other  Unobservable 
   2021  Active  Observable  Inputs 
      Markets  Inputs  (Level 3) 
      for Identical  (Level 2)    
      

Items

  

 

  

 

 
      

(Level 1)

  

 

     

Assets

                

Restricted cash held as a certificate of deposit

 $324  $324  $  $ 

Deposit held as a certificate of deposit

  151   151       

Total assets

 $475  $475  $  $ 
                 

Liabilities

                

Warrant liability

 $9,558  $  $  $9,558 

Contingent earnout liability

  561         561 

Total liabilities

 $10,119  $  $  $10,119 

 

The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended 3) as of December 31, 2019:2021 (in thousands):

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

 

Fair value of warrant liability at January 1, 2019

 $178 

Fair value of warrant liability reclassified to equity-Adoption of ASU 2017-11

  (56)

Fair value of July 2011 and October 2015 warrants transferred to equity upon exercise

  (553)

Issuance of Domestic, Foreign and Ladenburg warrants

  5,269 

Decrease in fair value of Domestic, Foreign and Ladenburg warrant liability during the year ended December 31, 2019

  (1,214)

Increase in fair value of July 2011 and October 2015 warrant liability during the year ended December 31, 2019

  465 

Derivative liability embedded in Convertible Note issued in March 2019

  427 

Decrease in fair value of embedded derivative liability during the year ended December 31, 2019

  (424)

Fair value of warrant liability and embedded derivative liability at December 31, 2019

 $4,092 

For the year ended December 31, 2018, as a result of the fair value adjustment of the warrant liability, the Company recorded a non-cash gain on a change in the fair value of $1.3 million in its consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss. The following is a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) during the year ended December 31, 2018:

Fair value of warrant liability at December 31, 2020

 $ 

Fair value of November 2021 Warrants issued

  14,172 

Decrease in fair value of November 2021 Warrants

  (4,614

)

Fair value of warrant liability at December 31, 2021

 $9,558 

 

(in thousands)

 

2018

 

Fair value of warrant liability at January 1, 2018

 $1,489 

Decrease in fair value during the year ended December 31, 2018

  (1,311)

Fair value of warrant liability at December 31, 2018

 $178 

49

NOTE 4.5. PREPAID EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT ASSETS

 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets consisted of the following:following (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

  

2022

  

2021

 
 

2019

  

2018

 

Prepaid inventory

 $211  $368 

Prepaid insurance

 146  138 

Prepaid dues and subscriptions

 43  18 

Prepaid marketing costs

 24  15 

Prepaid patents

 12  9 

Tenant Allowance

 11  - 

Prepaid consultants

 -  68 

Prepaid sales rebates

 $401  $925  -  19 

Rent receivable

     108 

Prepaid rent

     130  -  14 

Prepaid employees’ benefits

  8   113 

Prepaid dues and subscription

  82   130 

Prepaid insurance

  94   57 

Prepaid patents

  85   79 

Prepaid security deposit for lease

  65    

Retainer

  46    

Other

  105   218   113   129 

Total prepaid expenses and other current assets

 $886  $1,760  $560  $778 

 

 

NOTE 5.6. INVENTORY

 

Inventory consisted of the following:following (in thousands):

 

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Raw materials and supplies

 $1,273  $1,179 

Finished goods

  2,663   2,682 

Less: Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory

  (499

)

  (641

)

Total inventory, net

 $3,437  $3,220 

(in thousands)

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Raw materials and supplies

 $185  $217 

Finished goods

  554   167 

Less: Reserve for excess and obsolete inventory

  (247)  (104)

Total inventory, net

 $492  $280 
47

 

 

NOTE 6.7. PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT 

 

Property and equipment consisted of the following:following (in thousands):

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Office and laboratory equipment

 $20  $24 

Furniture and fixtures

  157   157 

Computer equipment and software

  349   385 

Production equipment

  65   65 

Leasehold improvements

  79   79 

Total property and equipment, at cost

  670   710 

Less: accumulated depreciation and amortization

  (560)  (509)

Total property and equipment, net

 $110  $201 

50

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Office and laboratory equipment

 $20  $20 

Furniture and fixtures

  157   157 

Computer equipment and software

  412   464 

Production equipment

     114 

Leasehold improvements

  152   79 

Total property and equipment, at cost

  741   834 

Less: accumulated depreciation

  (622

)

  (641

)

Total property and equipment, net

 $119  $193 

 

Depreciation and amortization expense was $65 thousand, $266$120 thousand and $95$59 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2022 and 2017,2021, respectively.

 

InDuring the quarteryears ended September 30, 2019, the Company determined to discontinue development of a software for internal use. This resulted in a $32 thousand impairment charge recorded to general and administrative expense in the consolidated statement of operation and comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2019.

In the quarter ended December 31, 2019,2022, and 2021, the Company disposed of damaged, unusable and fully depreciated property and equipment.equipment with cost of approximately $68 thousand and $12 thousand, respectively. As a result, the Company recognized a $3 thousandan immaterial loss on the disposal of these assets in the consolidated statements of operation for such periods.

During the year ended December 31, 2022, the Company recognized a long-lived asset impairment loss in connection with the DERMAdoctor business impairment. As such, the Company has recorded an impairment charge in the year ended December 31, 2022, of $66 thousand, net for property, plant and equipment which was recorded tois reflected in the general and administrative expensecaption in the Company’s consolidated statementstatements of operationoperations. The impairment information is discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Account Policies”.

NOTE 8. GOODWILL

Goodwill is accounted for in accordance with ASC 350,Intangibles-Goodwill and comprehensive lossOther. The Company does not amortize goodwill, but rather test for impairment annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that an asset may be impaired. There were indications of impairment during the year ended December 31, 2022. 

During the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment analysis following the steps laid out in ASC 350-20-35-3C. The Company’s annual impairment analysis includes a qualitative assessment to determine if it is necessary to perform the quantitative impairment test. In performing a qualitative assessment, the Company reviewed events and circumstances that could affect the significant inputs used to determine if the fair value is less than the carrying value of goodwill. The Company performed a Step 0 goodwill impairment analysis and determined that the fair value of the reporting unit may more likely than not be less than the carrying amount, which necessitated the Company performing the quantitative impairment test. After performing the quantitative impairment test in accordance with ASC 350-20-35-3C, the Company determined that goodwill related to its DERMAdoctor reporting unit was impaired by $4.2 million. As such, the Company has recorded a goodwill impairment charge in the year ended December 31, 2022, which is reflected in the goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment caption in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The impairment information is discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Account Policies,”. The Company did not record any goodwill impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2019.2021.

 

The following table presents details of our goodwill during the year ended December 31, 2022:

  

Amount

 

Balance as of December 31, 2021

 $4,528 
Goodwill impairment 4,180 
Balance as of December 31, 2022 $348 

NOTE 9. OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

For the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, other intangible assets consisted of the following (in thousands):

  

Balance at December 31, 2022

 
      

Accumulated

         
  Gross  

Amortization

  Impairment  Net 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets

                

Trade names

 $2,080  $  $(970) $1,110 
                 

Amortizable intangible assets

                

Customer relationships

 $290  $(48) $(172) $70 

Trade secrets / product formulations

  2,890   (375) $(1,415)  1,100 
                 

Total other intangible assets

 $5,260  $(423) $(2,557) $2,280 

  

Balance at December 31, 2021

 
      

Accumulated

         
  

Gross

  

Amortization

  Impairment  Net 

Indefinite-lived intangible assets

                

Trade names

 $2,080  $  $  $2,080 
                 

Amortizable intangible assets

                

Customer relationships

 $290  $(7) $  $283 

Trade secrets / product formulations

  2,890   (53)     2,837 
                 

Total other intangible assets

 $5,260  $(60) $  $5,200 

In the fourth quarter of 2022, the Company determined that certain of its indefinite-lived and long-lived amortizable intangible assets related to its DERMAdoctor business were impaired. As such, the Company has recorded an intangible asset impairment charge of $2.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2022, which is reflected in the goodwill, intangible and other asset impairment caption in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations. The impairment information is discussed in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Account Policies,”. The Company did not record any intangible asset impairment charges for the year ended December 31, 2021.

Amortization expense was $363 thousand and $60 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively. Based on the amortizable intangible assets as of December 31, 2022, future amortization expenses is expected to be as follows (in thousands):

2023

 $152 

2024

  153 

2025

  152 

2026

  153 

Thereafter

  560 

Total

 $1,170 
 

NOTE 7.10. ACCRUED LIABILITIES 

 

Accrued liabilities consisted of the following:following (in thousands):

 

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
(in thousands) 

2022

  

2021

 

Contract liabilities (see Note 14)

 $1,807  $1,289 

Employee payroll and benefits

  261   443 

Marketing costs

  104   51 

Inventory purchases

  101   0 

Other

  451   309 

Total accrued liabilities

 $2,724  $2,092 

NOTE 11. LINE OF CREDIT

At the time of the DERMAdoctor Acquisition, DERMAdoctor had a line of credit agreement with Bank Midwest for $500 thousand. The line of credit was terminated and repaid in full on January 6, 2022. The line of credit had an interest rate equal to the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate plus 1.50% with a floor of 5.00%. All borrowings were collateralized by substantially all assets of DERMAdoctor. As of December 31, 2022, there was no outstanding balance on the line of credit as such line of credit was terminated in the first quarter of 2022.

 

(in thousands)

 

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Employee payroll and benefits

 $463  $708 

Avenova contract liabilities

  822   2,282 

Deferred rent

     101 

Sublease security deposit

  198    

Accrued interest on Convertible Note

  13    

Consulting service

  109    

Related party consulting service

  33    

Other

  140   164 

Total accrued liabilities

 $1,778  $3,255 
49


 

 

NOTE 8.12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES 

Directors and Officers IndemnificationAgreements

 

As permitted under Delaware law and in accordance with its bylaws, the Company indemnifies its officers and directors for certain events or occurrences while the officer or director is or was serving at the Company’s request in such capacity. The term of the indemnification period is for the officer’s or director’s lifetime. The maximum amount of potential future indemnification is unlimited; however, the Company has a director and officer insurance policy that limits its exposure and may enable it to recover a portion of any future payments. The Company believes the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, it has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of December 31, 2019. 2022. 

 

In the normal course of business, the Company provides indemnification of varying scope under its agreements with other companies,entities, typically its clinical research organizations, investigators, clinical sites, suppliers, and others. Pursuant to these agreements, it generally indemnifies, holds harmless, and agrees to reimburse the indemnified parties for losses suffered or incurred by the indemnified parties in connection with the use or testing of its products or product candidates or with any U.S. patent or any copyright or other intellectual property infringement claims by any third party with respect to its products. The term of these indemnification agreements is generally perpetual. The potential future payments the Company could be required to make under these indemnification agreements is unlimited. Historically, costs related to these indemnification provisions have been immaterial. The Company also maintains various liability insurance policies that limit its exposure. As a result, it believes the fair value of these indemnification agreements is minimal. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any liabilities for these agreements as of December 31, 2019.2022. 

51

 

Legal Matters

 

From time to time, the Company may be involved in various legal proceedings arising in the ordinary course of business. On July 29, 2019, Mr. John McGovern, the Company’s former Interim President & Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, submitted a demand for arbitration seeking severance in the amount of $370,000 as well as additional damages in connection with his separation from service with the Company. The Company does not believe the claims asserted by Mr. McGovern have any merit, and the Company intends to defend against all such claims. As of December 31, 2019, 2022, there are were no other legal matters that, in the opinion of management, would ultimately result in liability that would have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Leases

 

The Company leases office space for its corporate headquarters located in Emeryville, California. The initial lease term is through was scheduled to expire on February 28, 2022. The2022, but on January 19, 2022, the Company has theexercised its option to extend the term ofand amended the lease for one five (5)-year period upon written notice to extend the landlord. The Company intends to exercise the renewal option for this lease. The Company also has a lease commitment for laboratory facilities and office space at EmeryStation North in Emeryville, California (“EmeryStation”) under an operating lease that will expire on Octoberterm through July 31, 2020. There are no stated renewal terms. Per the terms of the agreements, the Company does not have any residual value guarantees.2027.

 

In July 2016, theThe Company subleased all rentableis also party to a lease for 19,136 square feet of real property at EmeryStation (“Sublease Agreement”).space located in Riverside, Missouri, which it utilizes for light manufacturing, storage, distribution of products and administrative functions. The Sublease Agreementlease commenced September 8, 2016. The Sublease Agreement will terminate on October 21, 2020 1, 2019 and there are no stated renewal terms. Per the terms of the agreement, the sublessee does not have any residual value guarantees.

In addition to the facility leases, the Company has leased 54 vehicles under a master fleet lease agreement. Each lease is for a period of 36 months, which commenced upon the delivery of the vehicle during the first quarter of 2017. During the first quarter of 2019, in connection with the restructuring of its U.S. sales force, the Company reviewed its fleet leases for impairment. The Company estimated fair value basedexpires on the lowest level of identifiable estimated future cash flows and recorded an impairment charge of $125 thousand, which is included in the Sales and Marketing expenses line item within the Operating Expenses in the Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss for the year ended December 31, 2019. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company early terminated the lease agreement related to the idled vehicles, and has 15 leased vehicles as of December 31, 2019.

Additionally, the Company had an operating lease for 2 copiers which expired in August 2019. The Company renewed the lease in October 2019. The new lease will expire in October 2022. The monthly lease payment for the copiers is not material.2024.

 

In calculating the present value of the minimum lease payments, the Company has elected to utilizeutilized its incremental borrowing rate based on the original lease term and not the remaining lease term.rate. The Company has elected to account for each lease component and its associated non-lease components as a single lease component and has allocated all of the contract consideration across lease components only. This will potentially result in the initial and subsequent measurement of the balances of the right-of-use assets and lease liability for leases being greater than if the policy election was not applied. The leases include variable components (i.e.(e.g. common area maintenance, excess mileage charges, etc.)maintenance) that are paid separately from the monthly base payment based on actual costs incurred and therefore were not included in the right-of-use assets and lease liability, but are reflected as an expense in the period incurred.

 

The components of lease costs, lease term and discount rate for the year ended December 31, 2019 are as follows (in thousands except lease term and discount rate):

Lease Costs

    
     

Operating lease cost

 $1,130 

Sublease income

  (632)

Net lease cost

 $498 
     

Other information

    

Operational cash flow used for operating leases

 $1,285 
     
     

Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)

  1.7 

Weighted-average discount rate

  12%

Operating lease expense was $505 thousand and $483 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2018 2022 and 2017, respectively, under Topic 840.2021 were as follows (in thousands):

Lease Costs

 

For the Years Ended
December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Operating lease cost

 $525  $418 

Net lease cost

 $525  $418 
         

Other information

        

Operational cash flow used for operating leases

 $540  $475 

 

The Company has measured its operating lease liabilities at its incremental borrowing rate over the remaining term for each operating lease. The weighted average remaining lease term and the weighted average discount rate are summarized as follows:

  

For the Years Ended
December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)

  4.3   2.5 

Weighted-average discount rate

  5

%

  6

%

 

Future lease payments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2019 2022 were as follows (in thousands):

 

2020

 $1,047 

2021

  454 

2022

  88 

Thereafter

   

Total future minimum lease payments

  1,589 

Less imputed interest

  (154)

Total

 $1,435 
     

Reported as:

    

Operating lease liability

 $930 

Operating lease liability- non-current

  505 

Total

 $1,435 

Future lease payments to be received under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2019 were as follows (in thousands):

2020

 $577 

2021

   

2022

   

Thereafter

   

Total future minimum lease payments

 $577 

2023

 $535 

2024

  549 

2025

  431 

2026

  444 

2027

  290 

Total future minimum lease payments

  2,249 

Less imputed interest

  (208

)

Total

 $2,041 
     

Reported as:

    

Operating lease liability

 $453 

Operating lease liability- non-current

  1,588 

Total

 $2,041 

 

 

NOTE 9. RELATED PARTY NOTES PAYABLE

On February 27, 2019, the Company issued a $1.0 million promissory note payable to Pioneer Pharma (Hong Kong) Company Ltd. (“Pioneer Hong Kong”), which was amended on June 25, 2019 (the “Promissory Note”). The Promissory Note currently bears an interest payment of $300 thousand (initially $150 thousand) and is payable in full upon the Company's next financing with Pioneer Hong Kong and in no event after July 1, 2020 (an extension per the June amendment from the initial maturity date of July 27, 2019). The transaction was facilitated by China Kington Asset Management Co. Ltd. (“China Kington”) which has a perfected security interest in all tangible and intangible assets of the Company. In connection with the Promissory Note, the Companypaid China Kington a 2% fee for brokering the transaction and has entered into a consulting agreement with China Kington for a term of one year. Bob Wu, acting in a dual role as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors and as principal of China Kington, will be paid $100 thousand pursuant to such consulting agreement. Debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the Promissory Note of $20 thousand is recognized and recorded as an offset to the related party notes payable in the consolidated balance sheet. The debt issuance cost is being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the term of the Promissory Note, assuming that the Promissory Note will be fully paid on July 1, 2020. The Company determined that the changes in the terms of Promissory Note per the June amendment are accounted for as troubled debt restructurings in accordance with ASC 470, Debt. However, as future undiscounted cash flow is greater than the net carrying value of the original Promissory Note, no gain was recognized. The Company established a new effective interest rate based on the carrying value of the original debt and the revised cash flows.

The interest expense recognized, including amortization of the issuance costs, was $222 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2019.

53

The Promissory Note is presented as follows as of December 31, 2019:

(in thousands)

    

Principal amount

 $1,000 

Unamortized debt issuance costs

  (2)

Accrued interest

  204 

Total debt

  1,202 

Less: short-term

  1,202 

Long-term

 $ 

NOTE 10. CONVERTIBLE NOTE

On March 26, 2019 (the “Closing Date”), the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with Iliad Research and Trading, L.P. (the “Lender”), pursuant to which the Company issued a Secured Convertible Promissory Note (the “Convertible Note”) to the Lender dated as of the Closing Date. The Convertible Note has an original principal amount of $2.2 million, bears interest at a rate of 10% per annum and will mature on September 26, 2020, unless earlier paid, redeemed or converted in accordance with its terms. The Company received net proceeds of $2.0 million after deducting an original issue discount of $200 thousand and debt issuance cost of Lender’s transaction fees of $15 thousand. The Company recognized an additional $182 thousand of debt issuance costs associated with the issuance of the Convertible Note.

The Convertible Note provides the Lender with the right to convert, at any time, all or any part of the outstanding principal and accrued but unpaid interest into unregistered shares of the Company’s common stock at a conversion price of $1.65 per share. Beginning on September 26, 2019, the Convertible Note also provides the Lender with the right to redeem all or any portion of the Convertible Note (“Redemption Amount”) up to $200 thousand per calendar month. The payments of each Redemption Amount may be made, at the option of the Company, in cash, by converting such Redemption Amount into unregistered shares of Common Stock (“Redemption Conversion Shares”), or a combination thereof. The number of Redemption Conversion Shares equals the portion of the applicable Redemption Amount being converted divided by the lesser of $1.65 or the Market Price. The Market Price is defined as 85% of the lowest closing bid price during the 20 trading days immediately preceding the applicable measurement date. In addition, the Company may redeem the Convertible Note at its option at any time at a redemption price equal to 115% of the aggregate outstanding balance of principal and interest.

The Company has reserved 3,200,000 shares of its authorized and unissued common stock to provide for all issuances of common stock under the Convertible Note. 

Pursuant to a Security Agreement between the Company and the Lender, repayment of the Convertible Note is secured by all of the assets of the Company. The assets covered by the Security Agreement are currently first encumbered by that certain lien of up to $1.0 million, plus accrued and unpaid interest and fees, in favor of Pioneer Hong Kong described above.

The Convertible Note contains events of default upon the occurrence and during the continuance of which all obligations may be declared immediately due and payable. Under certain events of default, the outstanding balance of principal and interest shall be automatically due and payable in cash. Upon other events of default, the Lender, at its option, can elect to increase the outstanding balance by up to 15%, depending on the magnitude of the default, without accelerating the outstanding balance.

The Company’s prepayment terms represent an embedded call option, the Lender’s share redemption terms represent an embedded put option and certain events of default represent embedded derivatives, each of which require bifurcation. A single derivative comprising all bifurcatable features was measured at fair value using a Monte Carlo simulation model. The key assumptions used to value the combined embedded derivative upon issuance at March 26, 2019 were as follows:

  

As of

 

Assumption

 

March 26, 2019

 

Stock price (latest bid price)

 $1.28 

Equity volatility

  93.8

%

Risk-free interest rate

  2.34

%

Remaining term

  1.5 

54

The key assumptions used to value the combined embedded derivative as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:

  As of 

Assumption

 

December 31, 2019

 

Stock price

 $0.65 

Equity volatility

  192.6

%

Risk-free interest rate

  1.60

%

Remaining term

  0.74 

The fair value of the combined embedded derivative was $3 thousand as of December 31, 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company recorded a gain of $424 thousand, in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.

The aggregate $627 thousand discount, including the original issue discount, and the aggregate $197 thousand of debt issuance costs, including the Company’s issuance costs and payment for the Lender’s transaction fees, were recorded at issuance, and were classified as an offset to the Convertible Note on the consolidated balance sheet. The Convertible Note is presented as follows as of December 31, 2019:

(in thousands)

    

Principal amount

 $1,563 

Unamortized discount

  (117)

Unamortized debt issuance costs

  (37)

Total debt

  1,409 

Less: short-term

  1,409 

Long-term

 $ 

The discount and debt issuance costs are being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest rate method over the term of the Convertible Note, assuming that the Convertible Note will be redeemed at the maximum $200 thousand per month beginning in September 2019. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the effective interest rate on the Convertible Note was 52.67%. Interest expense recognized, including amortization of the issuance costs and debt discount, was $831 thousand during the year ended December 31, 2019.

On August 8, 2019, the Company entered into a securities purchase agreement (the “August SPA”) with certain domestic investors for the sale and issuance of 4,198,566 shares of common stock in a registered direct offering and 4,198,566 warrants exercisable for 4,198,566 shares of common stock in a simultaneous private placement at an offering price of $1.00 per share. The August SPA prohibits the Company from redeeming in common stock or common stock equivalents in satisfaction of the Promissory Note with Iliad Research & Trading, L.P. and may only issue common stock in satisfaction of the Promissory Note if the stock price equals or exceeds $2.00. See Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity” for further discussion of the terms of the August SPA.

The Lender started redeeming $200 thousand of the Convertible Note every month since September 27, 2019. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had repaid a total of $800 thousand in cash, $652 thousand of which was applied against the outstanding balance of the convertible note. As of December 31, 2019, the Company's contractual maturity of the principal balance of the Convertible Note was as follows:

(in thousands)

    

2020

 $1,563 

2021 and thereafter

   

Total

 $1,563 

55

NOTE 11.13. WARRANT LIABILITY

 

In July 2011,September 2022 Warrants

On September 9, 2022, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, the Company sold common stock and warrants in a registered direct financing. As part of this transaction, 139,520 warrants were issued withthe September 2022 Warrants. The September 2022 Warrants became exercisable on March 9, 2023 after being subject to an exercise pricerestriction until the later of $33.25 and were exercisable from January 1, 2012 to July 5, 2016. The terms of(i) March 9, 2023 or (ii) the warrants require registered shares to be delivered upon each warrant's exercise and also require possible cash payments todate that the warrant holders (in lieu of the warrant's exercise) upon specified fundamental transactions involving the Company's common stock, such as in an acquisition of the Company. UnderReverse Stock Split, which was approved by Company stockholders on November 10, 2022, becomes effective. As a result, under ASC 480, Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the Company's abilitySeptember 2022 Warrants were classified as equity as of December 31, 2022. See Note 14,Stockholders Equity”.

The fair value of the September 2022 Warrants was determined to deliver registered sharesbe $1.4 million as of the date of issuance in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  6.0 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.43

%

Dividend yield

  0.0

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $4.55 

As of November 10, 2022, the fair value of the September 2022 Warrants was determined to be $0.5 million in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.5

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.8 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.93

%

Dividend yield

  0.0

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $1.40 

November 2021 Warrants

The Company issued the November 2021 Warrants in the fourth quarter of 2021 which were all subsequently amended pursuant to the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction. The November 2021 Warrants, as amended, became exercisable on March 9, 2023 after being subject to a restriction upon anthe exercise of the warrantsNovember 2021 Warrants until the later of (i) March 9, 2023 or (ii) the date that the Reverse Stock Split, which was approved by the Company’s stockholders on November 10, 2022, becomes effective. See Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity”.

Under ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,the November 2021 Warrants prior to being amended were classified as liabilities as of December 31, 2021, which classification continued until the November 2021 Warrants became exercisable. The November 2021 Warrants became exercisable subsequent to December 31, 2021, on January 31, 2022 when our stockholders met and approved the necessary increase in authorized share capital available to meet the assumed exercise or conversion of the November 2021 Warrants and the Company'sSeries B Preferred Stock. On January 31, 2022, as a result of the stockholder approval of the increase in authorized share capital, the November 2021 Warrants became exercisable and were reclassified from a liability to equity because the warrants require physical settlement or net share settlement.

51

Upon issuance, the fair value of the November 2021 Warrants was determined to be $14.2 million in accordance with the following key assumptions as of November 2, 2021:

Expected price volatility

  84.9

%

Expected term (in years)

  6.2 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.29

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $13.30 

As of December 31, 2021 the fair value of the November 2021 Warrants was determined to be $9.6 million in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  87

%

Expected term (in years)

  6.0 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.31

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $8.75 

On September 9, 2022, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, the Company reduced the exercise price of all of the November 2021 Warrants to $0.18 per share and amended certain other of their terms. In connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, a total of 9,375,000 shares of common stock (or 267,857 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) underlying the November 2021 Warrants were exercised immediately after amendment. As a result, under ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity,the unexercised November 2021 Warrants, as amended, were classified as liabilities as of the date of amendment.

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  6.0 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.43

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $4.55 

As of November 10, 2022, the fair value of the November 2021 Warrants, as amended, was determined to be $1.3 million in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.5

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.8 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.93

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $1.40 

Amended July 2020 Warrants

On September 9, 2022, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, the Company reduced the exercise price of certain July 2020 Warrants exercisable for 4,800,000 shares of common stock (or 137,145 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) to $0.18 per share and amended certain other of their terms. In connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, a total of 2,100,000 shares of common stock (or 60,000 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) underlying the Amended July 2020 Warrants were exercised immediately after amendment. The remaining Amended July 2020 Warrants exercisable for 2,700,000 shares of common stock (or 77,145 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) became exercisable on March 9, 2023 after being subject to a restriction upon their exercise until the later of (i) March 9, 2023 or (ii) the date that the Reverse Stock Split, which was approved by Company’s stockholders on November 10, 2022, becomes effective. As a result, under ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the unexercised Amended July 2020 Warrants were classified as liabilities on the date of amendment.

The fair value of the Amended July 2020 Warrants was determined to be $0.3 million on the date of amendment in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  3.4 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.58

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $3.50 

52

As of November 10, 2022, the fair value of the Amended July 2020 Warrants was determined to be $0.1 million in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.5

%

Expected term (in years)

  3.2 

Risk-free interest rate

  4.15

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $1.05 

2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants and 2019 Ladenburg Warrants

The Company issued the 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants and 2019 Ladenburg Warrants (each as defined in Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity”) in the third quarter of 2019. The terms of the 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants and 2019 Ladenburg Warrants all required potential cash-settlement in the event of a specified fundamental transaction. Under ASC 480,Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity, the warrants were classified as liabilities because the Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants was deemed to be beyond the Company’s control. The fair value of outstanding warrants was determined at each reporting date using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the changes in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations.

Upon issuance in the third quarter of 2019, the fair value of the 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants and 2019 Ladenburg Warrants was determined to be $3.1 million, $2.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

In the third quarter of 2020, as further described in Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity”, the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants were exercised at reduced exercise prices. The warrant liabilities associated with these warrants were adjusted to their fair values as of the date of exercise, with the change in fair values recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The fair values were then transferred to equity. As of the date of exercise, the fair value of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants was determined to be $4.9 million and $4.2 million, respectively, in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Assumptions

 

2019 Domestic

Warrants

  

2019 Foreign

Warrants

 

Expected price volatility

  178

%

  178

%

Expected term (in years)

  4.57   4.57 

Risk-free interest rate

  0.25

%

  0.27

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrant

 $41.30  $53.90 

There were no 2019 Domestic Warrants or 2019 Foreign Warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2022.

In the third quarter of 2020, as further described in Note 14, “Stockholders’ Equity”, the Company amended the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants. The Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants if a specified fundamental transactions occur are deemedtransaction occurred was amended to be beyondapply only in situations within the Company'sCompany’s control. The warrants contain a provision according to which the warrant holder would have the option to receive cash, equal to the Black Scholes fair value of the remaining unexercised portion of the warrant, as cash settlement in the event that there is a fundamental transaction (contractually defined to include various merger, acquisition or stock transfer activities). DuePursuant to this provision, ASC 480 requires that these warrants bechange, the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were no longer classified as liabilities. The fair values of these warrants have been determined using the Lattice valuation model, and the changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The Lattice model provides for assumptions regarding volatility and risk-free interest rates within the total period to maturity. In addition, after January 5, 2012, and if the closing bid price per share of the common stock in the principal market equals or exceeds $66.50 for any ten trading days (which do not have to be consecutive) in a period of fifteen consecutive trading days, the Company has the right to require the exercise of one-third of the warrants then held by the warrant holders.

In October 2015, the holders of all warrants issued pursuant to the Company's securities purchase agreement dated March 3, 2015 (the "2015 Securities Purchase Agreement") agreed to reduce the length of notice required to such investors prior to the Company's issuance of new securities from twenty business days to two business days, for the remainder of such investors' pre-emptive right period (which expired March 3, 2016). The Company entered into these agreements to enable it to expeditiously raise capital in the October 2015 Offering (as described below) and future offerings. As consideration for these agreements, the Company amended certain provisions of both the warrants with a 15-month term (the "Short-Term Warrants") and warrants with a five-year term (the "Long-Term Warrants") issued pursuant to the 2015 Securities Purchase Agreement (together, the "March 2015 Warrants") and the warrants issued pursuant to the placement agent agreement dated June 29, 2011 (the "July 2011 Warrants"). Specifically, the amendments decreased the exercise price for both the March 2015 Warrants and the July 2011 Warrants to $5.00 per share. In addition, the amendments extended the exercise expiration date for the Short-Term Warrants and the July 2011 Warrants to March 6, 2020. A price protection provision also was added to both the July 2011 Warrants and March 2015 Warrants, such that if the Company subsequently sells or otherwise disposes of Company common stock at a lower price per share than $5.00 or any securities exchangeable for common stock with a lower exercise price than $5.00, the exercise price of such warrants will be reduced to that lower price.

In October 2015, the Company also entered into an underwriting agreement with Roth Capital Partners, LLC, relating to the public offering and sale of up to (i) 492,000 shares of the Company's common stock; and (ii) warrants to purchase up to 442,802 shares of the Company's common stock (the "October 2015 Warrants") with an exercise price of $5.00 per share (the "October 2015 Offering"). The shares of common stock and warrants were issued separately. Each warrant was exercisable immediately upon issuance and will expire 60 months from the date of issuance. The price to the public in the October 2015 Offering was $5.00 per share of common stock and related warrant. The net proceeds to the Company were approximately $2.1 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions and offering expenses.

In February 2016, the strike price of the July 2011, March 2015 and October 2015 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 per share, pursuant to the price protection provisions in such warrants, because the Company sold common stock to Mr. Jian Ping Fu at that price.

In May 2019, the strike price of the July 2011 Warrants, March 2015 Warrants and October 2015 Warrants was further reduced to $0.2061 per share, pursuant to the price protection provisions in such warrants, because the Company sold common stock to Triton Funds LP at that price.

The key assumptions used to value the July 2011 Warrants as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:

  As of 
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2019

  

2018

 

Expected price volatility

  115

%

  77

%

Expected term (in years)

  0.18   1.18 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.52

%

  2.60

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.44  $0.29 

56

In March 2015, the Company issued both the Short-Term Warrants ($15.00 per share exercise price) and the Long-Term Warrants ($16.25 per share exercise price). At that time, the Company determined that these warrants qualified for equity accounting and did not contain embedded derivatives that required bifurcation. After the Company's agreement to modify the terms of the March 2015 Warrants and July 2011 Warrants in October 2015, the Company evaluated the change in terms of the March 2015 Warrants and noted that the change in terms resulted in liability classification of both the Short-Term and Long-Term Warrants. The March 2015 Warrants were re-issued and valued as of October 27, 2015 at a total of $1.8 million with the new terms, and a modification expense was recorded at the difference between the fair value of the warrants on their new terms after modification as of October 27, 2015 and the fair value of the warrants on their original terms prior to modification as of October 27, 2015. The fair values of these warrants have been determined using the Lattice valuation model, and the changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.  

As described in Note 2, “Summary of Significant Account Policies,” upon adoption of ASU 2017-11, the Company determined that excluding the consideration of the down round provision, the Long-Term and Short-Term Warrants are considered to be indexed to the Company’s stock and should be classified in equity. The Company reclassified warrant liabilities related to the Long-Term and Short-Term Warrants to additional paid-in capital on its March 31, 2019 consolidated balance sheets, which increased additional paid-in capital by $56 thousand and decreased warrant liability by $56 thousand. In addition, because of the modified retrospective adoption, the Company recorded a cumulative-effect adjustment of $356 thousand to the Company's beginning accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2019, with an offset that increased additional paid-in capital by $356 thousand.

The key assumptions used to value the Short-Term Warrants as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:

  

As of

 
  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2018

 

Expected price volatility

  77

%

Expected term (in years)

  1.18 

Risk-free interest rate

  2.60

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.24 

The key assumptions used to value the Long-Term Warrants as of December 31, 2018 were as follows:

  

As of

 
  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2018

 

Expected price volatility

  77

%

Expected term (in years)

  1.18 

Risk-free interest rate

  2.60

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.29 

As noted above, the Company issued warrants in connection with the October 2015 Offering. The Company evaluated the terms of the October 2015 Warrants and noted that under ASC 480, the Company's potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants if specified fundamental transactions occur are deemed to be beyond the Company's control. Due to this provision, ASC 480 requires that these warrants be classified as liabilities. The fair values of these warrants have been determined using the Lattice valuation model, and the changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value of the warrants at issuance on October 27, 2015 was $1.3 million.

The key assumptions used to value the October 2015 warrants as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were as follows:

  

As of

 
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2019

  

2018

 

Expected price volatility

  184

%

  73

%

Expected term (in years)

  0.83   1.83 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.59

%

  2.51

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.49  $0.38 

57

During the second quarter of 2017, a total of 21,000 warrants to purchase 21,000 shares of common stock were exercised related to the March 2015 Short-Term and Long-Term warrants resulting in gross proceeds of $38 thousand. Upon exercise, the warrant liability associated with these warrantsthe 2019 Ladenburg Warrants was adjusted to its fair value as of the date of exercise of $58 thousand,the amendment, with anythe change in fair value recorded in the consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss.operations. The $58 thousand fair value was subsequentlythen transferred to equity as of the date of exercise.

During the second quarter of 2019, a total of 158,400 warrants to purchase 158,400 shares of common stock were exercised related to the July 2011 Warrants and the October 2015 Warrants resulting in gross proceeds of $33 thousand. Upon exercise, the warrant liability associated with these warrants was adjusted to its fair value as of the date of exercise of $0.4 million, with any change in fair value recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The $0.4 million fair value was subsequently transferred to equity as of the date of exercise.

During the third quarter of 2019, a total of 102,602 warrants to purchase 102,602 shares of common stock were exercised related to the October 2015 Warrants resulting in gross proceeds of $21 thousand. Upon exercise, the warrant liability associated with these warrants was adjusted to its fair value as of the date of exercise of $0.2 million, with any change in fair value recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The $0.2 million fair value was subsequently transferred to equity as of the date of exercise.

In August 2019, the Company issued: (1) warrants to purchase up to 4,198,566 shares of Company common stock to certain domestic investors in connection with its registered direct offering of 4,198,566 shares of common stock (the “2019 Domestic Warrants”); (2) warrants to purchase up to 2,700,000 shares of Company common stock to certain foreign investors in connection with a private placement of the Series A Preferred Stock (the “2019 Foreign Warrants”); and (3) warrants to purchase up to 167,942 shares of Company common stock to Ladenburg Thalmann & Co., Inc. for its services as placement agent in the registered direct offering (the “2019 Ladenburg Warrants”). See Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity” for further discussion of the terms of the financing transactions in August 2019.

The 2019 Domestic Warrants are exercisable six months after the date of issuance and will expire on February 13, 2025, with an exercise price of $1.15. The terms of the 2019 Domestic Warrants require registered shares to be delivered upon each warrant’s exercise and also require possible cash payments to the warrant holders (in lieu of the warrant’s exercise) upon specified fundamental transactions involving the Company’s common stock, such as an acquisition of the Company. The 2019 Domestic Warrants contain a provision according to which the warrant holder would have the option to receive cash, equal to the Black Scholes fair value of the remaining unexercised portion of the warrant, as cash settlement in the event that there is a fundamental transaction (contractually defined to include various merger, acquisition or stock transfer activities). Due to this provision, ASC 480 requires the 2019 Domestic Warrants be classified as liabilities. The fair values of these warrants have been determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and the changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss.equity. The fair value of the 2019 Domestic Ladenburg Warrants at issuancewas determined to be $0.2 million on August 13, 2019 was $3.1 million. the date of amendment in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  186

%

Expected term (in years)

  4.05 

Risk-free interest rate

  0.22

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $40.95 

 

The key assumptions used2019 Ladenburg Warrants will no longer be adjusted to fair value in reporting periods after the amendment. All 2019 Domestic Ladenburg Warrants remained outstanding as of August 13, 2019 were as follows:

  

As of

 
  

August 13,

 

Assumption

 

2019

 

Expected price volatility

  149.29

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.50 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.58

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.75 

The key assumptions used to value the 2019 Domestic Warrants as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:2022.

  As of 
  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2019

 

Expected price volatility

  154.10

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.13 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.70

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.57 

 

 

The 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were exercisable immediately upon issuance and will expire on August 8, 2024, with an exercise price of $1.25. The terms of the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants are consistent with the 2019 Domestic Warrants, and therefore were classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC 480. The fair values of these warrants have been determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and the changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value of the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants at issuance on August 13, 2019 was $124 thousand. 

The key assumptions used to value the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants as of August 13, 2019 were as follows:

  

As of

 
  

August 13,

 

Assumption

 

2019

 

Expected price volatility

  155.19

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.00 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.57

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.74 

The key assumptions used to value the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:

  As of 
  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2019

 

Expected price volatility

  159.94

%

Expected term (in years)

  4.61 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.69

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.57 

The 2019 Foreign Warrants were exercisable upon shareholders’ approval, which was received on October 9, 2019, and will expire on February 13, 2025, with an exercise price of $1.15. The terms of the warrants are consistent with the 2019 Domestic Warrants, and therefore were classified as liabilities in accordance with ASC 480. The fair values of these warrants have been determined using the Black-Scholes valuation model, and the changes in the fair value are recorded in the consolidated statement of operations and comprehensive loss. The fair value of the 2019 Foreign Warrants at issuance on August 13, 2019 was $2.0 million. 

The key assumptions used to value the 2019 Foreign Warrants as of August 13, 2019 were as follows:

  

As of

 
  

August 13,

 

Assumption

 

2019

 

Expected price volatility

  149.29

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.50 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.58

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.75 

The key assumptions used to value the 2019 Foreign Warrants as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:

  As of 
  

December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2019

 

Expected price volatility

  154.10

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.13 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.70

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $0.57 

59

 

The details of all outstanding warrant liability as of December 31, 2019 were as follows:

      

Warrant

 

(shares and dollars in thousands)

 

Shares

  

Liability

 

Warrant liability - current

        

July 2011 Warrants

  35  $15 

October 2015 Warrants

  38   19 
   73  $34 
         

Warrant liability – non-current

        

2019 Domestic Warrants

  4,199  $2,410 

2019 Foreign Warrants

  2,700   1,550 

2019 Ladenburg Warrants

  168   95 
   7,067  $4,055 

NOTE 12.14. STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

 

Common Stock and Preferred Stock

 

Under the Company’s amended articlesAmended and Restated Certificate of incorporation,Incorporation, as amended, the Company is authorized to issue up to 150,000,000 shares of common stock and up to 5,000,000 shares of preferred stock in such series and with such(with rights and preferences as may be approved by the Company’s Board of Directors. Directors).

Reverse Stock Split

Effective November 15, 2022, the Company amended its Certificate of Incorporation to effect a 1-for-35 reverse split of its outstanding common stock. The Reverse Stock Split was approved by the Company’s stockholders on November 10, 2022. As a result of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, there were nothe Reverse Stock Split, every 35 shares of preferredthe Company’s pre-reverse split outstanding common stock outstanding.were combined and reclassified into 1 share of common stock. Proportionate voting rights and other rights of common stockholders were not affected by the reverse stock split. Any fractional shares of common stock resulting from the Reverse Stock Split were rounded up to the nearest whole share. All stock options outstanding, common stock reserved for issuance under the Company’s equity incentive plans, common stock reserved for issuance under the Series B Preferred Stock and outstanding warrants were adjusted by dividing the number of affected shares of common stock by 35 and, as applicable, multiplying the exercise/conversion price by 35. Except as otherwise specifically noted, all share numbers, share prices, exercise prices and per share amounts have been adjusted, on a retroactive basis, to reflect this 1-for-35 reverse stock split.

2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction and September 2022 Warrants

 

On August 8, 2019, September 9, 2022,the Company entered into the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, which included warrant reprice letter agreements with each of the holders of the November 2021Warrants and certain holders of the July 2020Warrants. Pursuant to the terms of the letter agreements, the November 2021 Warrants and certain July 2020 Warrants were amended to: (i) reduce the exercise price; (ii) provide that such warrants would not be exercisable until a securitieslater date, which was March 9, 2023; and (iii) in the case of the November 2021 Warrants, extend the termination date to September 11, 2028.

As a result of these amendments to the Amended November 2021Warrants and the Amended July 2020Warrants, the Company recorded a non-cash loss on modification of common stock warrants in the amount of $1.9 million. The loss represents the increase in fair value of the November 2021Warrants, as amended, and the Amended July 2020Warrants as a result of the modification. The increase in fair value was calculated as the difference in value immediately before and after modification using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The fair value of the Amended November 2021Warrants and the Amended July 2020Warrants was determined to be $3.3 million immediately prior to the modification in accordance with the following key assumptions:

  

November 2021

Warrants

  

July 2020

Warrants

 

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  5.4   3.4 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.43

%

  3.58

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $3.15  $0.70 

The fair value of the Amended November 2021Warrants and the Amended July 2020Warrants was determined to be $5.2 million immediately after the modification in accordance with the following key assumptions:

  

November 2021

Warrants

  

July 2020

Warrants

 

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  6.0   3.4 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.43

%

  3.58

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $4.55  $3.50 

Additionally, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, the Company issued to certain participants in the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction that exercised their Amended November 2021 Warrants and their Amended July 2020 Warrants, the September 2022 Warrants to purchase agreement for the salea number of (i) 2,700,000 shares of common stock equal to 100% of the Series A Preferred Stocknumber of shares that automatically converted into 2,700,000a participant exercised under its November 2021 Warrant or Amended July 2020 Warrant, as applicable. The September 2022 Warrants are exercisable for an aggregate of 327,860 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share and expire on September 11, 2028.

The 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction resulted in gross proceeds of approximately $2.1 million. The Company allocated the gross proceeds between the common stock issued for the Amended November 2021Warrants and the Amended July 2020Warrants exercised, and the September 2022Warrants issued to participants by applying the relative fair value allocation methodology. The Company allocated $0.7 million in gross proceeds to the common stock issued for the Amended November 2021Warrants and the Amended July 2020Warrants exercised, and $1.4 million to the September 2022Warrants which are classified as a ratioliability. For additional information regarding the warrant liability and valuation, please see Note 13, “Warrant Liability”.

54

Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Ladenburg”) served as the Company’s warrant solicitation agent for the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction in exchange for a fee equal to 8% of the total gross proceeds. The Company incurred total issuance costs of $529 thousand in conjunction with the 2022Warrant Reprice Transaction. The Company allocated $166 thousand of the issuance costs to the warrant liability which was expensed in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations during the year ended December 31, 2022. The remaining $363 thousand was recorded as a reduction of common stock and additional paid in capital in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Series C Preferred Stock and Warrants

Concurrent with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction on September 9, 2022, the Company entered into the 2022 Private Placement, a private placement transaction with certain accredited investors to sell units that consisted of: (1) 3,250 shares of  Series C Preferred Stock convertible into an aggregate of 516,750 shares of common stock, (2) the Short-Term Warrants exercisable for 515,876 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share, and (3) the Long-Term Warrants exercisable for 515,876 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $6.30 per share. The closing of the 2022 Private Placement was subject to receiving certain stockholder approvals (as obtained on November 10, 2022), effecting the Reverse Stock Split, as well as the satisfaction of other customary closing conditions. On November 18, 2022, the Company closed the 2022 Private Placement and received gross proceeds of $3.2 million from the sale of the Series C Preferred Stock and the 2022 Warrants.

As of December 31, 2022, the 1,031,752 shares of common stock underlying the 2022 Warrants (with 515,876 underlying each of the Short-Term Warrants and the Long-Term Warrants) became exercisable on March 9, 2023 at an exercise price of $6.30 with the Short-Term Warrants expiring on May 20, 2024 and the Long-Term Warrants expiring on November 20, 2024.

Series B Preferred Stock and November 2021 Warrants

On October 29, 2021, the Company entered into the 2021 Private Placement, including a securities purchase agreement with various institutional investors to sell in a private placement offering (i) an aggregate of 15,000 shares of our newly-created Series B Non-Voting Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”) convertible into an aggregate of 37,500,000 shares of common stock (or 1,071,429 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split), and (ii) the November 2021 Warrants exercisable for 37,500,000 shares of common stock (or 1,071,429 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) for net proceeds of $14.9 million. The 2021 Private Placement closed on November 2, 2021.

The November 2021 Warrants were not immediately exercisable upon issuance. In order for the November 2021 Warrants to become exercisable, the Company was required to hold a stockholder meeting to (i) obtain stockholder approval, in accordance with Section 713(a) and (b) of the NYSE American Company Guide, for the issuance of the shares underlying the Series B Preferred Stock and the November 2021 Warrants (the “Share Issuance Proposal”) and (ii) obtain stockholder approval of an amendment to the Company’s Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 100,000,000 shares to 150,000,000 shares (the “Authorized Share Increase Proposal”). The Company held a special meeting of stockholders on December 17, 2021 (the “Special Meeting”) at which the Share Issuance Approval was approved by stockholders and, at a subsequent adjournment of the Special Meeting on January 31, 2022, the stockholders approved the Authorized Share Increase Proposal. As a result of these approvals having been given by the stockholders at the Special Meeting, the November 2021 Warrants became exercisable as of January 31, 2022, and will continue to be exercisable for a period of six (6) years from such date.

The conversion by the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock was initially subject to approval of the Share Issuance Proposal. Until the Share Issuance Proposal was approved by stockholders at the Special Meeting, the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock were limited in converting their shares to an aggregate of 19.99% of the outstanding shares of common stock immediately prior to the closing of the 2021 Private Placement. As a result of the Company’s stockholders which occurred on October 9, 2019, and (ii) 2,700,000approving the Share Issuance Proposal at the Special Meeting, this limitation upon conversion of Series B Preferred Stock was no longer applicable to the holders as of December 17, 2021. The Series B Preferred Stock does not have any preemptive rights or a preference upon any liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of NovaBay. The Series B Preferred Stock does, however, have anti-dilution protection in the event that the Company sells or grants any of its common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 2,700,000 sharesor any other securities, subject to certain limited exceptions, that would entitle the holder thereof to acquire common stock at an effective price per share that is lower than the then applicable conversion price of Commonthe Series B Preferred Stock.

 

The rights ofCompany allocated the net proceeds between the Series AB Preferred Stock includedand the following:

Conversion. As described above,November 2021 Warrants by applying the Series A Preferred Stock automatically converted into 2,700,000 shares of Common Stock, at a ratio of 1:1, upon the approval of the Company’s stockholders, which occurred on October 9, 2019. Prior to stockholder approval, the Preferred Stock was not convertible.

Anti-dilution Protection. The Series A Preferred Stock did not contain any price-based anti-dilution protection.

Liquidation Preference. In the event of the Company’s liquidation, dissolution or winding up (voluntary or involuntary), the holders of Preferred Stock were entitled to receive the same amount as a holder of common stock.

Voting Rights. Shares of Series A Preferred Stock generally had no voting rights except as required by law and certain enumerated voting rights such as increasing the authorized shares of preferred stock.

Dividend Rights. The holders of Series A Preferred Stock were entitled to receive dividends on shares of the Series A Preferred Stock equal (on an as if converted to common stock basis) to and in the same form as dividends actually paid on shares of the common stock when, as and if such dividends are paid on shares of the common stock. The Series A Preferred Stock were not entitled to any other dividends.

Redemption. The Series A Preferred Stock had no redemption rights.residual fair value methodology. The Company was not obligatedfirst allocated $14.2 million to redeem or repurchase any shares of Preferred Stock.

As the conversion trigger was dependent upon shareholder approval which is considered to be outsideNovember 2021 Warrants, with the control of the Company, the Series A Preferred Stock was considered to be contingently redeemable and as a result, was classified as mezzanine equity in the Company’s interim balance sheet as of September 30, 2019. Upon conversion of the Series A Preferred Stock into shares of the Company’s common stock in October 2019, it is classified as equity in the Company’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2019.

The Company applied the fair value allocation methodology for allocating the proceeds of $2.7 million received from the Series A financing. The Company first allocated $2.0 million based on the fair value of the warrants as of the issuance date, with residual amount being allocated to the Series AB Preferred Stock. See Note 11,13, “Warrant Liability” for further discussion of the key assumptions used to value the warrants.November 2021 Warrants.

 

China Kington served as placement agent in exchange for a commission equal to six percent (6%) ofIn connection with the gross proceeds, totaling $162 thousand. The Company incurred additional issuance costs of $33 thousand. The Company allocated $93 thousand to the warrant liability, which was expensed during the period and $102 thousand was recorded as a reduction to the Series A Preferred Stock.

On October 9, 2019, the Company held a special meeting of stockholders (the “Special Meeting”), at which the Company’s stockholders approved (i) the conversion of 2,700,000 shares of the Series AB Preferred Stock, into 2,700,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, and (ii) the 2,700,000 shares of Company common stock that may be issued upon the exercise of the 2,700,000 2019 Foreign Warrants, in accordance with the stockholder approval requirements of NYSE American LLC Company Guide Section 713(a). Arecorded a beneficial conversion feature of $800 thousand was recorded$0.7 million as a discount to the preferred stockSeries B Preferred Stock and an increase to additional paid in capital. Because the Series A Preferred Stock was perpetual, in October 2019, theThe Company fully amortized the discount related to the beneficial conversion feature on the deemed dividend in the consolidated statementstatements of operations and comprehensive loss, which is reflectedupon approval of the Share Issuance Proposal in the results forfourth quarter of 2022.

The Company incurred total issuance costs of $1.7 million in conjunction with the 2021 Private Placement. The Company allocated $1.6 million of the issuance costs to the warrant liability which was expensed in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations loss during the year ended December 31, 2019.2021. The remaining $0.1 million was recorded as a reduction of Series B Preferred Stock in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

Each share of the Series B Preferred Stock that the Company issued in the 2021 Private Placement had a purchase price of $1,000 per share and was initially convertible at a conversion price of $0.40 into 2,500 shares of common stock, or an aggregate of 37,500,000 shares of common stock (which does not account for the Reverse Stock Split). On September 9, 2022, the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction provided for amendments to certain common stock purchase warrants to lower their exercise price to $0.18 per share as well as the issuance of the September 2022 Warrants also with an exercise price of $0.18 per share, which exercise price was lower than the then effective $0.40 conversion price of the Series B Preferred Stock (which does not account for the Reverse Stock Split). This triggered the Series B Preferred Stock anti-dilution feature, resulting in the automatic adjustment to the conversion price for each outstanding share of the Series B Preferred Stock to $0.18, and each outstanding share of Series B Preferred Stock became convertible into 5,556 shares of common stock (which does not account for the Reverse Stock Split). As a result of the change, the Company recorded a $5.7 million deemed Series B Preferred Stock dividend. The deemed dividend is recorded as a reduction to income available to common shareholders in the basic earnings per shares (EPS) calculation. In accordance with ASC 820, the deemed dividend was measured as the difference between (1) the fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock immediately prior to the conversion price adjustment (but without the anti-dilution protection feature) and (2) the fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock immediately after the conversion price adjustment (but without the anti-dilution protection feature). The fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock was determined to be $6.9 million immediately prior the conversion price adjustment in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  1.3 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.64

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $8.05 

The fair value of the Series B Preferred Stock was determined to be $12.5 million immediately after the conversion price protection adjustment in accordance with the following key assumptions:

Expected price volatility

  79.6

%

Expected term (in years)

  1.3 

Risk-free interest rate

  3.64

%

Dividend yield

  0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of warrants

 $2.10 

Thereafter, the Company effected the Reverse Stock Split, which resulted in an automatic adjustment to the conversion price for each outstanding share of the Series B Preferred Stock to $6.30, and each outstanding shares of Series B Preferred Stock became convertible into 159 shares of common stock.

As of December 31, 2022, 3,380 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock had been converted into common stock. Each of the remaining 11,620 shares of the Series B Preferred Stock as of December 31, 2022, is currently convertible into 159 shares of common stock at a conversion price of $6.30.

On September 9, 2022, in connection with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, the November 2021 Warrants were amended to reduce the exercise price to $0.18 (or $6.30 to adjust for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) and extend the expiration date to September 11, 2028. Additionally, in conjunction with the 2022 Warrant Reprice Transaction, holders of the November 2021 Warrants, as amended, exercised a portion of their warrants at the reduced exercise price. As of December 31, 2022, the 803,574 shares of common stock underlying the November 2021 Warrants, as amended, became exercisable on March 9, 2023.

 

Common Stock

 

May 2021 At the Market Offering

In the second quarter of 2021, the Company established an at-the-market offering and equity program with Ladenburg (the “2021 ATM Program”). For additional information regarding the offering and equity program, see the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on May 14, 2021. During the firstsecond quarter of 2018,2021, 2,672,000 shares of common stock were issued under the 2021 ATM Program for total net proceeds of $1.8 million, net of offering costs of $0.1 million.

56

Common Stock Warrants

TLF Bio Innovation 2021 Warrants

On January 15, 2021, TLF Bio Innovation was granted warrants exercisable for 15,000 shares of common stock (or 429 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) with an exercise price of $0.6718 (or $23.5130 if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) (the “TLF Warrants”). The TLF Warrants will expire five years after their issuance. The TLF Warrants are classified as equity.

2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants, 2019 Ladenburg Warrants and July 2020 Warrants

As of December 31, 2022, there were no 2019 Domestic Warrants, 2019 Foreign Warrants, 2019 Ladenburg Warrants or July 2020 Warrants (each as defined below) outstanding. Therefore, the share amounts and related exercise prices below have not been adjusted to account for the Reverse Stock Split. 

In the third quarter of 2019, the Company entered into a share purchase agreement with OP Financial Investments Limited(the “2019 Purchase Agreement”) for the sale of (i) 4,198,566 shares of common stock and (ii) 4,198,566 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 4,198,566 shares of common stock (the “2019 Domestic Warrants”) for gross proceeds of $4.2 million. The 2019 Domestic Warrants were issued with an exercise price of $1.15 and an expiration date of February 13, 2025.

The Company allocated the proceeds between the common stock and 2019 Domestic Warrants by applying the relative fair value allocation methodology. The Company first allocated $3.1 million to the 2019 Domestic Warrants, with the residual amount allocated to the common stock. See Note 13, “Warrant Liability” for further discussion of the key assumptions used to value the 2019 Domestic Warrants.

The Company incurred total issuance costs of $0.5 million in conjunction with the 2019 Purchase Agreement. The Company allocated $0.2 million of the issuance costs to the warrant liability which was expensed in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations during the period. The remaining $0.3 million was recorded as a reduction of additional paid-in capital in the Company’s consolidated balance sheets.

During the third quarter of 2020, the Company and the holders of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and the 2019 Foreign Warrants entered into exercise agreements which resulted in the cash exercise of the warrants at a reduced exercise price of $0.99. The Company received aggregate gross proceeds of approximately $6.8 million from the exercises. The Company incurred and paid other offering costs of $0.2 million. The Company also incurred and paid a $0.2 million fee to China Kington for brokering the transaction, which equaled six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds from the 2019 Foreign Warrants.

During the third quarter of 2020, the Company and all holders of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants entered into warrant repricing letter agreements. Pursuant to the agreement, in consideration for the exercise in full of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants, the Company agreed to: (1) reduce the exercise price of the 2019 Domestic Warrants and the 2019 Foreign Warrants to $0.99 per share prior to exercise, and (2) in a private placement, issue new common stock purchase warrants (the “July 2020 Warrants”) to purchase up to a number of shares of common stock, equal to 100% of the number of 2019 Domestic Warrants and 2019 Foreign Warrants currently held by such holders upon the holders exercising their warrants.

The July 2020 Warrants became exercisable nine months after their issuance, for an aggregate of 1,700,0006,898,566 shares of common stock. The July 2020 Warrants have an exercise price of $1.65 per share and will expire five and a half years after their issuance. The Company determined that the Company’s common stock par value $0.01 per share, for an aggregate purchase priceissued from the exercise of $5.984 million (the “OP Private Placement”). The OP Private Placement closed on February 8, 2018. China Kingtonthe 2019 Domestic and 2019 Foreign Warrants, and the July 2020 Warrants to be one unit of account, and therefore did not allocate the proceeds between the common stock and the July 2020 Warrants as, the proceeds, even if allocated, would be both recognized in additional paid-in capital.

2019 Ladenburg Warrants

Ladenburg served as the placement agent for the transaction related to the 2019 Purchase Agreement in exchange for a commission equal to representing six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, totaling $359 thousand.The Company also paid $34 thousand to NYSE American$0.3 million, and common stock purchase warrants exercisable for the listing of the additional shares.

On March 29, 2019, the Company entered into a Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Triton Funds LP, a Delaware limited partnership (“Triton”), pursuant to which the Company had the right to sell up to $3.0 million of167,942 shares of common stock of the Company at a purchase price equal to 90% of the lowest trading price of the common stock of the Company for the five business days prior to the applicable closing date. The Company also entered into a Registration Rights Agreement on March 29, 2019 with Triton, pursuant to which the Company registered such shares for resale by Triton on a registration statement on Form S-3 filed with the SEC on April 1, 2019 and declared effective on April 12, 2019. In connection with the transaction with Triton Funds LP, the Company entered into a Letter Agreement with Triton Funds LLC, an affiliate of Triton, pursuant to which the Company issued 150,000(or 4,799 shares of common stock to Triton Funds LLC. Duringas adjusted for the second quartersubsequent Reverse Stock Split) with an expiration date of 2019, the Company issued to Triton Funds LP an aggregate of 1,747,312 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, for an aggregate purchase price of $360 thousand. The Company also incurred and paid other offering costs of $122 thousand. On September 5, 2019, the Company received an additional $288 thousand in connection with the financing and recorded the amount in additional paid-in capital from issuance of common stock. No additional shares were issued related to the receipt of $288 thousand. The Common Stock Purchase Agreement with Triton Funds LP expired as of December 31, 2019 and the remaining registered but unsold shares were deregistered on February 1, 2020.

On June 26, 2019, the Company entered into a private placement to sell 1,371,427 shares of Company common stock and warrants to purchase an additional 1,371,427 shares of Company common stock for an aggregate subscription price of $2.4 million to three accredited investors including Messrs. Xiao Rui Liu, Hai Dong Pang and Ping Huang, each of whom subscribed for $1.0 million, $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. China Kington served as placement agent in exchange for a commission equal to six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, totaling $144,000. The Company also incurred and paid other offering costs of $27 thousand.

On August 8, 2019, 2024 (the Company entered into the August SPA for the sale and issuance of 4,198,566 shares of common stock at an offering price of $1.00 per share. In connection with the August SPA, the Company issued 4,198,566 warrants to purchase 4,198,566 shares of Company common stock with an exercise price of $1.15.“2019 Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc. (“Placement Agent”Warrants”) served as placement agent for the transaction in exchange for a commission representing six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, totaling $252 thousand, and the issuance of the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants to purchase up to 167,942 shares of the common stock with an exercise price of $1.25.. In addition, the Company reimbursed the Placement Agent $60 thousand for certain expenses. The Company also incurred and paid other offering costs of $312 thousand. The August SPA limits the Company’s ability to issue new common stock or common stock equivalents for a period of one year (six months if it is an “at the market” offering with the Placement Agent) until the daily volume weighted average price of the Company’s common stock equals or exceeds $2.00 for a period of 10 consecutive days. The Company is prohibited from redeeming in common stock or common stock equivalents in satisfaction of the Promissory Note with Iliad Research & Trading, L.P. and may only issue common stock in satisfaction of the Promissory Note if the stock price equals or exceeds $2.00. See Note 10, “Convertible Note”, for detailed information related to the convertible note.$0.3 million.

 

The Company applied the fair value allocation methodology for allocating the proceeds of $4.2 million received from the financing. The Company first allocated $3.1 million based on the fair value of the 2019 Domestic Warrants as of the issuance date, with the residual amount being allocated to the common stock. See Note 11, “Warrant Liability” for further discussion of the key assumptions used to value the warrants.

61

In connection with the financing, the Company incurred issuance cost of $488 thousand of which $233 thousand was allocated to the warrant liability and expensed during the period and $255 thousand was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital from the issuance of common stock. As the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were accounted for as a stock issuance cost, $59 thousand was allocated to the warrant liability and expensed during the period and $65 thousand was recorded as a reduction to additional paid-in capital fromin the issuanceCompany’s consolidated balance sheets. See Note 13, “Warrant Liability” for a discussion of common stock.the key assumptions used to value the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants.

57

During the third quarter of 2020, the Company also entered into a reprice agreement with Ladenburg which reduced the exercise price to $0.99 per share (or $34.65 to adjust for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) and amended certain terms of the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants. The Company’s potential obligation to cash-settle the warrants if a specified fundamental transaction occurred was amended to apply only in situations within the Company’s control. As further described in Note 13, “Warrant Liability”, the 2019 Ladenburg Warrants were no longer classified as a liability as a result of this amendment.

Stock June 2019 Private Placement and June 2019 Warrants

 

In February 2016,As of December 31, 2022, there were noJune 2019 Warrants (as defined below) outstanding. Therefore, the strikeshare amounts and related exercise prices ofbelow have not been adjusted to account for the July 2011, March 2015, and October 2015 Warrants were reduced to $1.81 per share, pursuant to the price protection provisions in such warrants, because the Company sold common stock to Mr. Jian Ping Fu at that price.

In May 2019, the strike price of the July 2011, March 2015, and October 2015 Warrants was reduced to $0.2061 per share, pursuant to the price protection provisions in such warrants, because the Company sold common stock to Triton Funds LP at that price.

As more fully described in Note 3, “Fair Value Measurements,” the March 2015 Warrants were reclassified from warrant liabilities to equity upon adoption of ASU 2017-11. Upon the down round feature being triggered in May 2019 and the strike price being reduced to $0.2061 per share resulting from the sale of common stock to Triton Funds LP at a price of $0.2061 per share, the Company measured the value of the effect of the down round feature as the difference between (1) the March 2015 Warrants’ fair value (without the down round feature) using the pre-trigger exercise price and (2) the March 2015 Warrants’ fair value (without the down round feature) using the reduced exercise price in accordance with ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, and as a result, recorded a $29 thousand dividend, which is treated as a reduction to income available to common shareholders in the basic EPS calculation. The July 2011 Warrants and October 2015 Warrants were excluded from this exercise as they were classified as liabilities.Reverse Stock Split.

 

During the second quarter of 2019, the Company entered into a total of 158,400 warrantsprivate placement agreement to purchase 158,400sell 1,371,427 shares of common stock were exercised related to the October 2015 Warrants resulting in gross proceeds of $33 thousand. Please see Note 11, “Warrant Liability”,and 1,371,427 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for further details. 

During the second quarter of 2019, a total of 133,167 warrants to purchase 133,1671,371,427 shares of common stock were exercised related(the “June 2019 Warrants”) for an aggregate subscription price of $2.4 million. Three accredited investors, Messrs. Xiao Rui Liu, Hai Dong Pang and Ping Huang, subscribed to the March 2015 Warrants. Outprivate placement for $1.0 million, $0.4 million and $1.0 million, respectively. China Kington served as placement agent in exchange for a commission equal to six percent (6%) of the 133,167 warrants exercised, 70,000 warrants were exercised in a cashless transaction, resulting in 64,979 shares issued. The remaining warrants were exercised for gross proceeds, totaling $0.1 million. The Company also paid other offering costs of $13$27 thousand.

 

In The June 2019 the CompanyWarrants were issued 1,371,427 warrants to purchase 1,371,427 shares of Company common stock in a private placement. Please see the preceding subsection, “Common Stock,” for further details regarding such private placement. Such warrants have a one (1)-year term andwith an exercise price of $0.87 and an expiration date of June 17, 2020. The June 2019 Warrants were callable by the Company if the closing price of the Company’s common stock, as reported on the NYSE American, iswas $1.00 or greater.

 

In July 2019,During the first quarter of 2020, a total of 102,602 warrants to purchase 102,602 shares of common stock228,571 June 2019 Warrants were exercised, related to the October 2015 Warrants resulting in gross proceeds of $21$199 thousand. Please see Note 11, “Warrant Liability”,The Companypaid China Kington a fee of $12 thousand, or six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, for further details. brokering the exercise transaction.

During the second quarter of 2020, a total of 571,428 June 2019 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $497 thousand. The Companypaid China Kington a fee of $29 thousand, or six percent (6%) of the gross proceeds, for brokering the exercise transaction. Also, during the second quarter of 2021, all remaining 571,428 June 2019 Warrants expired unexercised.

October 2015 Warrants

As of December 31, 2022, there were noOctober 2015 Warrants (as defined below) outstanding. Therefore, the share amounts and related exercise prices below have not been adjusted to account for the Reverse Stock Split.

 

In August 2019,the fourth quarter of 2015, the Company issued 4,198,566442,802 common stock purchase warrants to purchase 4,198,566exercisable for 442,802 shares of common stock in connection with a public offering (the “October 2015 Warrants”). The warrants were issued with an exercise price of $5.00 and an expiration date of October 27, 2020. In February 2016 and May 2019, the exercise price of outstanding October 2015 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 and $0.2061 per share, respectively, pursuant to price protection provisions of the warrants. Also during the fourth quarter of 2021, a total of 22,680 October 2015 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $5 thousand.

During the fourth quarter of 2020, all remaining 15,320 October 2015 Warrants expired unexercised.

March 2015 Warrants

As of December 31, 2022, there were no March 2015 Warrants (as defined below) outstanding. Therefore, the share amounts and related exercise prices below have not been adjusted to account for the Reverse Stock Split.

In the first quarter of 2015, the Company issued 649,133 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 649,133 shares of common stock in connection with a private placement offering (the “March 2015 Warrants”). The exercise price of individual March 2015 Warrants varied between $15.00 and $16.25 per share at the time of issuance. The Company issued 278,200 of the March 2015 Warrants with an expiration date of March 6, 2020, and the remaining 370,933 March 2015 Warrants with an expiration date of September 6, 2015. In October 2015, in connection with a separate financing event, the exercise price of all outstanding March 2015 Warrants was reduced to $5.00 per share and the expiration date of all outstanding warrants expiring on September 6, 2015, was extended to March 6, 2020. In February 2016 and May 2019, the exercise price of all outstanding July 2011 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 and $0.2061 per share, respectively, pursuant to price protection provisions of the warrants.

During the first quarter of 2020, a total of 70,000 March 2015 Warrants were exercised, resulting in gross proceeds of $14 thousand. Also in the first quarter of 2020, all remaining 7,419 March 2015 Warrants expired unexercised.

58

July 2011 Warrants

As of December 31, 2022, there were no July 2011 Warrants (as defined below) outstanding. Therefore, the share amounts and related exercise prices below have not been adjusted to account for the Reverse Stock Split.

In the third quarter of 2011, the Company issued 139,520 common stock purchase warrants exercisable for 139,520 shares of common stock in connection with a registered direct offering of common stock. Such warrants will be exercisable six months after date of issuance and will expire on February 13, 2025,financing (the “July 2011 Warrants”). The July 2011 Warrants were issued with an exercise price of $1.15. The Company issued 167,942 warrants to purchase 167,942 shares$33.25 and an expiration date of Company common stock to the Placement Agent July 5, 2016. In October 2015, in connection with such offering. Such warrants were exercisable immediately upon issuance and will expire on August 8, 2024, with ana separate financing event, the exercise price of $1.25. Please seeoutstanding July 2011 Warrants was reduced to $5.00 per share and the preceding subsection, “Common Stock,” for further details regarding such offering.expiration date extended to March 6, 2020. In February 2016 and May 2019, the exercise price of outstanding July 2011 Warrants was reduced to $1.81 and $0.2061 per share, respectively, pursuant to price protection provisions of the warrants.

 

In August 2019, the Company also issued 2,700,000 warrants to purchase 2,700,000 sharesMarch 2020, a total of Company common stock in connection with its private placement of Series A Preferred Stock. Such warrants were exercisable upon shareholders’ approval and will expire on February 13, 2025, with an exercise price of $1.15. Please see the preceding subsection, “Preferred Stock,” for further details regarding such private placement.35,107 July 2011 Warrants expired unexercised.

62

 

The following table summarizes information about the Company'sdetails of all outstanding warrants outstanding at as of December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, and activity during the three years then ended. 2022 were as follows:

 

      

Weighted-

 
  Warrants  

Average

 
  (in thousands)  

Exercise

 
      

Price

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

  565  $1.81 

Warrants granted

  -  $- 

Warrants exercised

  (21) $1.81 

Warrants expired

  -  $- 

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

  544  $1.81 

Warrants granted

  -  $- 

Warrants exercised

  -  $- 

Warrants expired

  -  $- 

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

  544  $1.81 

Warrants granted

  8,438  $1.11 

Warrants exercised

  (394) $0.21 

Warrants expired

  -  $- 

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

  8,588  $1.09 

  

Warrants
(in thousands)

  

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2020

  201  $57.13 

Warrants granted

  1  $23.51 

Warrants expired

    $ 

Outstanding at December 31, 2021

  202  $57.13 

Warrants granted

  2,431  $8.18 

Warrants exercised

  (327

)

 $6.30 

Warrants expired

  

 

 $ 

Outstanding at December 31, 2022

  2,306  $7.70 

 

 

NOTE 13.15. EQUITY-BASED COMPENSATION

 

Equity Compensation Plans 

 

In October 2007, the Company adopted the 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2007“2007 Plan”) to provide for the granting of equity awards, such as stock options, unrestricted and restricted common stock, stock units, dividend equivalent rights, and stock appreciation rights to employees, directors and outside consultants, as determined by the Board of Directors (the “Board”). At the inception of the Board.  The 2007 Plan 80,000 shares were reserved for awards under the 2007 Plan.

For the years from 2009 to 2012, the number of shares of common stock authorized for awards under the 2007 Plan increased annually in an amount equal to the lesser of (a) 40,000 shares; (b) 4% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstandingexpired on the last day of the preceding year; or (c) such lesser number as determined by the Board. Accordingly, an additional 40,000, 37,427, and 37,207 shares of common stock were authorized for awards under the 2007 Plan in January 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Beginning in 2013, the shareholders voted to remove the 40,000-share cap and the 2007 Plan’s shares authorized for awards increased annually by 4% of the number of shares of the Company’s common stock outstanding on the last day of the preceding year. Accordingly, an additional 32,646 and 59,157 shares of common stock were authorized for awards under the 2007 Plan in January 2014 and 2013, respectively. On March 30, 2015, the Company filed a registration statement to add an additional 82,461 shares to the 2007 Plan’s shares authorized for awards. In January 2016, the Company added 139,449 shares to the 2007 Plan’s shares authorized for awards, per the 2007 Plan’s evergreen provision. On May 26, 2016, the stockholders of the Company approved an amendment to the 2007 Plan to increase the number of shares of Company common stock authorized for awards thereunder by 1,124,826 shares. In January 2017, the Company added 610,774 shares to the 2007 Plan’s shares authorized for awards, per the 2007 Plan’s evergreen provision. As a result of the foregoing, the aggregate number of shares authorized for awards under the 2007 Plan was 2,318,486 shares, prior to its expiration on March 15, 2017 (after taking into account prior awards under the 2007 Plan).

2017. Upon expiration, of the 2007 Plan, new awards cannot be issued pursuant to the 2007 Plan, but awards outstanding as of its March 15, 2017 plan expiration date willawards continue to be governed by its terms. Under the terms of the 2007 Plan, the exercise price of incentive stock options may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and, if granted to an owner of more than 10% of the Company’s stock, then not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. Stock options granted under the 2007 Plan expire no later than ten years from the date of grant. StockAll stock options granted to employees generally vest over four years, while options granted to directors and consultants typically vest over a shorter period, subject to continued service.outstanding under the 2007 Plan were fully vested as of December 31, 2021.

63

 

In March 2017, the Company adopted the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the “2017“2017 Plan”), which was approved by shareholdersstockholders on June 2, 2017, to provide for the granting of equity awards, such as nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”), incentive stock options (“ISOs”), restricted stock, performance shares, stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock units (“RSUs”)RSUs and other share-based awards to employees, directors, and consultants, as determined by the Board.  The 2017 Plan will does not affect awards previously granted under the 2007 Plan. The Upon adoption, the 2017 Plan allowsallowed for awards of up to 2,318,48666,243 shares of the Company’s common stock, plus an automatic annual increase in the number of shares authorized for awards on the first day of each of the Company’s fiscal years beginning January 1, 2018 through January 1, 2027 equal to (i) 4% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding on the last day of the immediately preceding fiscal year or (ii) such lesser number of shares of common stock than provided for in Section 4(a)4(a)(i) of the 2017 Plan as determined by the Board. AsOn March 6, 2022, the number of December 31, 2019, there were 1,789,174 shares available for future awards under the 2017 Plan was increased by 54,590 shares. As of December 31, 2022, there were 90,591 shares available for future awards under the 2017 Plan.

 

Under the terms of the 2017 Plan, the exercise price of NQSOs, ISOs and SARs may not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant and, if ISOs are granted to an owner of more than 10% of the Company’s stock, then not less than 110% of the fair market value of the common stock on the date of grant. The term of awards will not be longer than ten years, or in the case of ISOs, not longer than five years with respect to holders of more than ten percent10% of the Company’s stock. Stock options granted to employees generally vest over four years, while options granted to directors and consultants typically vest over a shorter period, subject to continued service. The Company issues new shares to satisfy option exercises under the 2007 Plan and the 2017 Plan.

 

59

Stock Option Summary 

 

The following table summarizes information about the Company’s stock options and restricted stock outstanding at December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2021, and activity during the three years then ended:year ended December 31, 2022:

 

(in thousands, except years and per share data)

 

Options

  

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining Contractual

Life (years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

  

Options

  

Weighted-

Average

Exercise

Price

  

Weighted-

Average

Remaining

Contractual

Life (years)

  

Aggregate

Intrinsic

Value

 

Outstanding at December 31, 2016

  1,489  $8.38   8.7  $702 

Outstanding at December 31, 2021

 127  $48.77  7.6  $460 
 

Options granted

  1,616  $3.03          19  $9.62      

Restricted stock units granted

  49  $          5  $      

Options exercised

  (68) $2.72         

Restricted stock units vested

  (39) $          (3

)

 $      

Options forfeited/cancelled

  (87) $22.08          (15

)

 $93.48      

Restricted stock units cancelled

  -  $           (1

)

       

Outstanding at December 31, 2017

  2,960  $5.16   8.6  $2,586 

Outstanding at December 31, 2022

  132  $37.99  7.5  $69 

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2022

  97  $50.41  7.1  $10 
                 

Options granted

  1,118  $2.03         

Restricted stock units granted

  12  $         

Options exercised

  (4) $2.35         

Restricted stock units vested

  -  $         

Options forfeited/cancelled

  (701) $5.12         

Restricted stock units cancelled

  (11) $         

Outstanding at December 31, 2018

  3,374  $4.13   8.2  $8 

Vested at December 31, 2022

  63  $68.89  6.2  $ 
                 

Options granted

  145  $0.37         

Restricted stock units granted

  204  $         

Options exercised

  (83) $2.30         

Restricted stock units vested

  (209) $         

Options forfeited/cancelled

  (1,247) $4.01         

Restricted stock units cancelled

  (1) $         

Outstanding at December 31, 2019

  2,183  $4.03   6.6  $43 
                

Vested and expected to vest at December 31, 2019

  2,165  $4.05   6.5  $43 
                

Vested at December 31, 2019

  1,818  $4.44   6.2  $ 
                

Exercisable at December 31, 2019

  1,818  $4.44   6.2  $ 

Exercisable at December 31, 2022

  63  $68.89   6.2  $ 

 

The aggregate intrinsic value in the table above is calculated as the difference between the exercise price of the underlying stock option awards and the closing market price of the Company’s common stock as quoted on the NYSE American as of December 31, 2019 2022 for options that have a quoted market price in excess of the exercise price. There were 83 thousandno stock option awards exercised during the yearyears ended December 31, 2019 for which the Company received cash payments of $189 thousand. There was no intrinsic value for stock option awards exercised for the year ended December 31, 2019. There were 4 thousand stock option awards exercised for the year ended December 31, 2018 for which the Company received cash payments of $11 thousand. There was no intrinsic value for stock option awards exercised for the year ended December 31, 2018. There were 68 thousand stock option awards exercised for the year ended December 31, 2017 for which the Company received cash payments of $185 thousand. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock option awards exercised was $116 thousand for the year ended December 31, 2017.2022 and 2021.

64

 

As of December 31, 2019, 2022, total unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options and restricted stock was approximately $491 thousand.$0.5 million. This amount is expected to be recognized as stock-based compensation expense in the Company’s consolidated statements of operations and comprehensive loss over the remaining weighted average vesting period of 2.202.04 years.

 

Stock Option Awards to Employees and Directors 

 

The Company grants options to purchase common stock to its employees and directors at prices equal to or greater than the market value of the stock on the dates the options are granted. The Company has estimated the value of stock option awards as of the date of grant by applying the Black-Scholes-MertonBlack-Scholes option pricing model using the single-option valuation approach. The application of this valuation model involves assumptions that are judgmental and subjective in nature. See Note 2, “Summary of Significant Account Policies,” for a description of the accounting policies that the Company applied to value its stock-based awards. 

 

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2022 and 2017,2021, the Company granted options to employees and directors to purchase an aggregate of 145,000, 1,085,000,18,607 and 1,529,00014,748 shares of common stock, respectively.

 

The weighted-average assumptions used in determining the value of options are as follows: 

 

 

Year Ended December 31,

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Assumptions

 

2022

  

2021

 

Expected price volatility

  112.41%  89.30%  87.78% 158

%

 164

%

Expected term (in years)

  6.14   5.98   6.90  6.45  6.19 

Risk-free interest rate

  1.99%  2.80%  2.12% 2.36

%

 1.05

%

Dividend yield

  0.00%  0.00%  0.00% 0.00

%

 0.00

%

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period

 $0.31  $1.51  $2.34  $9.22  $22.37 

 

Expected Price Volatility—This is a measure of the amount by which the stock price has fluctuated or is expected to fluctuate. The computation of expected volatility was based on the historical volatility of our own stock.

 

Expected Term—This is the period of time over which the options granted are expected to remain outstanding. The expected life assumption is based on the Company’s historical data.

 

60

Risk-Free Interest Rate—This is the U.S. Treasury rate for the week of the grant having a term approximating the expected life of the option.

 

Dividend YieldWe have The Company has not made any dividend payments nor do wedoes the Company have plans to pay dividends in the foreseeable future.

 

Forfeitures are estimated at the time of grant and reduce compensation expense ratably over the vesting period. This estimate is adjusted periodically based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from the previous estimate.

 

As part of Mr. Mark Sieczarek’s separation agreement, in July 2019,During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company paid him the amount due under the agreement via 168 thousandgranted 5,148 and 34,291, shares of fully vested registered stock. The expense related to this separation agreement was accrued for and expensed during July 2019, and the shares were issued to him via fully vested registered stock in July 2019.  See further details on Mr. Mark Sieczarek’s resignation below.

In addition, the Company granted restricted stock to employees totaling 12,000, and 10,000 shares of common stock in the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017,directors, respectively.

 

For the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2022 and 2017,2021, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $449 thousand, $671 thousand,$0.2 million and $2,371 thousand,$0.7 million, respectively, for option awards to employees and directors.

 

65

In July 2017, Mr. Paulson announced his retirement from his position as CFO of the Company as of December 31, 2017. As part of his employment agreement, the Company modified his stock options, effective upon his retirement. All outstanding stock options held by Mr. Paulson became fully vested upon retirement, and the option exercise period was extended from three months to three years, calculated from the date of retirement. Options with an expiration date prior to the end of the exercise period maintained the same expiration date. As this agreement was entered into during the third quarter of 2017 and Mr. Paulson agreed to continue providing service through December 31, 2017, the Company recorded stock-based compensation expense in connection with the stock option modification in both the third and fourth quarters of 2017. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $244 thousand during the three months ended September 30, 2017 and $260 thousand during the three months ended December 31, 2017.

In March 2018, the Company modified stock options held by Mr. Liu, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective March 21, 2018. The option exercise period for Mr. Liu was extended from three months to three years, calculated from his date of resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $26 thousand.

In April 2019, the Company modified stock options held by Mr. Yonghao (Carl) Ma, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective April 29, 2019. The option exercise period for Mr. Liu was extended from three months to three years, calculated from his date of resignation. Also, his stock option awards became fully vested at the date of his resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $14 thousand, which is included in the $449 thousand of stock-based compensation recognized in 2019 noted above.

In May 2019, the Company modified stock options held by Mr. Yanbin (Lawrence) Liu, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective May 1, 2019. The option exercise period for Mr. Yanbin Liu was extended from three months to three years, calculated from his date of resignation. Also, his stock option awards became fully vested at the date of his resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $7 thousand, which is included in the figure above.

In July 2019, the Company modified stock options held by Mr. Mark Sieczarek, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective July 20, 2019. The option exercise period for Mr. Mark Sieczarek was extended from three months to three years, calculated from his date of resignation. Also, his stock option awards became fully vested at the date of his resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $60 thousand, which is included in the figure above.

In September 2019, the Company modified stock options held by Mr. Todd Zavodnick, who resigned as a director of the Company, effective September 11, 2019. The option exercise period for Mr. Todd Zavodnick was extended from three months to three years, calculated from his date of resignation. Also, his stock option awards became fully vested at the date of his resignation. In connection with the stock option modification, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $24 thousand, which is included in the figure above.

Stock-Based Awards to Non-Employee ConsultantsNon-Employees

 

During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, the Company did not grant options to purchaseexercisable for shares of common stock to non-employees. During the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 the Company granted options to purchase an aggregate of 33,000 and 86,000 shares of common stock, respectively, to non-employees in exchange for advisory and consulting services. The stock options are recorded at their fair value on the measurement date and recognized over the respective service or vesting period. The fair value of the stock options granted was calculated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model based upon the following assumptions:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

Assumption

 

2018

  

2017

 

Expected price volatility

  85.03%  87.41%

Expected term (in years)

  10.0   10.0 

Risk-free interest rate

  2.94%  2.27%

Dividend yield

  0.00%  0.00%

Weighted-average fair value of options granted during the period

 $1.99  $2.40 

During the fourth quarter of the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company paid two consultants, Ms. Moon and Ms. Xiao, via a combination of 36 thousand registered shares and cash for services rendered, based on the terms of their consulting agreement.

 

The Company did not grant restricted stock to non-employees during the year ended December 31, 2018.2022.

 

TheIn connection with former director Mr. Sieczkarek’s resignation, the Company granted 31 thousandentered into a two-year consulting agreement with Mr. Sieczkarek under which he is entitled to receive additional shares of fully vested registered stock to non-employee Dr. Ron Najafi in the year ended December 31, 2017, as part of his settlement agreement, as described below. In addition, the Company also granted restricted stock to a non-employee consultant totaling 8 thousand shares of common stock in the year ended December 31, 2017, in exchange for advisory and consulting services. According to the terms of the agreement, the stock units are to be issued in two tranches of $0.2 million each for a total aggregate fair market value equal to $0.4 million. The number of shares issued for each tranche is calculated using the closing price on each respective grant date. In July 2021, the Company issued 9,382 shares to Mr. Sieczkarek to fulfill the second tranche. The expense related to the shares issued under the consulting agreement was recorded over the term of the Consulting Agreement.

66

 

For the yearsyear ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, 2022, the Company recognized a nominal amount of stock-based compensation expense as relates to non-employees. For the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $37$240 thousand, $0, and $243 thousand, respectively, related to non-employee options and restricted stock grants.

 

In November 2015, Dr. Ron Najafi resigned from his position as President and CEO of the Company. As part of his separation agreement, in December 2016, the Company paid him a portion of the amount due under the agreement via a combination of registered shares and cash during fiscal year 2016. The expense related to this separation agreement was accrued for and expensed in the year ended December 31, 2015, and the shares were issued to him via fully vested registered stock in December 2016.  In January 2017, the remaining portion of the amount due under the agreement was paid via a combination of registered shares and cash.

Summary of Stock-Based Compensation Expense 

 

A summary of the stock-based compensation expense included in results of operations for the optionoptions and restricted stock awards discussed above is as follows:follows (in thousands): 

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Research and development

 $42  $32  $113 

Sales and marketing

  93   141   152 

General and administrative

  351   498   2,277 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 $486  $671  $2,542 

Since the Company continues to operate at a net loss, it does not expect to realize any current tax benefits related to stock options.   

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Research and development

 $20  $10 

Sales and marketing

  52   129 

General and administrative

  148   794 

Total stock-based compensation expense

 $220  $933 

 

 

NOTE 14. LICENSE, COLLABORATION AND16. DISTRIBUTION AGREEMENTS

 

Transactions under the Company'sCompany’s major distribution agreements are recognized upon transfer of control of product sold to its major distribution partners at the amount of consideration that the Company expects to be entitled to. The Company records contract liabilities for the invoiced amounts that are estimated to be subject to significant reversal, including product revenue allowances for cash consideration paid to customers for services, discounts, rebate programs, chargebacks, and product returns.

 

Milestone payments are included in the estimated transaction price when they are considered probable

61

Product Sales Discounts and collaboration revenue, the transaction price under license and collaboration arrangements, including upfront fees and milestone payments, are allocated differently to each performance obligation and may be recognized at earlier points in time or with a different pattern of performance over time.Allowances 

 

The following table presents changes activities and ending reserve balances for each significant category of discounts and allowance, which constitute variable consideration for the year ended December 31, 2022 (in thousands): 

  

Chargebacks,

Discounts for

Prompt Payment

  

Other

Customer

Fees

  

Rebates

  

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $1,150  $83  $56  $1,289 

Provision related to sales made in:

                

Current period

 $1,865  $65  $448  $2,378 

Payments and customer credits issued

 $(1,342

)

 $(95

)

 $(423

)

 $(1,860

)

Balance at December 31, 2022

 $1,673  $53  $81  $1,807 

The following table presents activities and ending reserve balances for each significant category of discounts and allowance, which constitute variable consideration for the Company'syear ended December 31, 2021 (in thousands): 

  

Chargebacks,

Discounts for

Prompt Payment

  

Other

Customer

Fees

  

Rebates

  

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $537  $91  $102  $730 

Provision related to sales made in:

                

Current period

 $1,374  $135  $723  $2,232 

Payments and customer credits issued

 $(761

)

 $(143

)

 $(769

)

 $(1,673

)

Balance at December 31, 2021

 $1,150  $83  $56  $1,289 

Contract Assets and Liabilities

The Company receives payments from our distribution partners established in each contract. Amounts are recorded as accounts receivable when the Company’s rights to consideration is unconditional. The Company may be required to defer recognition of revenue for upfront payments until it performs its obligations under these arrangements, and such amounts are recorded as deferred revenue upon receipt.

The following table presents contract assets and liabilities forreported in the year ended December 31, 2019:

  

Balance at

Beginning of the

Period

  

Additions

  

Deductions

  

Balance at the end

of the Period

 
  

(in thousands)

 

Contract liabilities: deferred revenue

 $41  $-  $(41) $- 

Contract liabilities: accrued liabilities

  1,432   5,708   (6,706)  434 

Total

 $1,473  $5,708  $(6,747) $434 

67

For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company recognized the following revenueconsolidated balance sheets (in thousands):

 

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

 

Revenue recognized in the period from:

        

Amounts included in contract liabilities at the beginning of the year:

        

Performance obligations satisfied

 $1,473  $1,453 

New activities during the year:

        

Performance obligations satisfied

  5,126   11,055 
         
  $6,599  $12,508 

License, Collaboration and Distribution Agreements

In January 2012, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with China Pioneer Pharma Holdings Limited, a Shanghai-based company (“China Pioneer”) that markets high-end pharmaceutical products into China and an affiliate of Pioneer Singapore, for the commercialization of NeutroPhase in this territory. Under the terms of the agreement, NovaBay received an upfront payment of $312,500. NovaBay also received $312,500 in January 2013, related to the submission of the first marketing approval for the product to the Chinese Food and Drug Administration (the “CFDA”). The deferred revenue was recognized as the purchase discounts were earned, with the remaining deferred revenue recognized ratably over the product distribution period. During the year ended December 31, 2014, NovaBay received $625,000 upon receipt of a marketing approval of the product from the CFDA.

In September 2012, the Company entered into two agreements with China Pioneer: (1) an international distribution agreement (“Distribution Agreement”) and (2) a unit purchase agreement (“Purchase Agreement”). These agreements were combined and accounted for as one arrangement with one unit of accounting for revenue recognition purposes.

Pursuant to the terms of the Distribution Agreement, China Pioneer has the right to distribute NeutroPhase, upon a marketing approval from a Regulatory Authority, in certain territories in Asia (other than China). Upon execution of the Distribution Agreement, the Company received an upfront payment, which was recorded as deferred revenue. China Pioneer is also obligated to make certain additional payments to the Company upon receipt of the marketing approval. The Distribution Agreement further provides that China Pioneer is entitled to a cumulative purchase discount not to exceed $500,000 upon the purchase of NeutroPhase product, payable in NovaBay unregistered restricted common stock.

Pursuant to the Purchase Agreement, the Company also received $2.5 million from China Pioneer for the purchase of restricted units (comprising one share of common stock and a warrant for the purchase of one share of common stock). The unit purchase was completed in two tranches: (1) 800,000 units in September 2012; and (2) 1,200,000 units in October 2012, with both tranches at a purchase price of $1.25 per unit. The fair value of the total units sold was $3.5 million, based upon the trading price of the Company’s common stock on the dates the units were purchased and the fair value of the warrants based on the Black-Scholes Merton option pricing model. Because the aggregate fair value of the units on the dates of purchase exceeded the $2.5 million in proceeds received from the unit purchase by approximately $1.0 million, the Company reallocated $600,000 from deferred revenue to stockholders’ equity as consideration for the purchase of the units.

In December 2013, the Company announced it had expanded its NeutroPhase commercial partnership agreement with China Pioneer. The expanded agreement includes licensing rights to Avenova and CelleRx, which were developed internally by NovaBay. The expanded partnership agreement covers the commercialization and distribution of these products in China and 11 countries in Southeast Asia.

On February 7, 2012, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Integrated Healing Technologies, LLC, (“IHT”) to distribute NeutroPhase. NovaBay received an upfront payment of $750,000.

In April 2013, the Company entered into a collaboration and license agreement with Virbac. Under this agreement, Virbac acquired exclusive worldwide rights to develop the Company’s proprietary compound, auriclosene (NVC-422), for global veterinary markets for companion animals. The Company received an upfront payment of $250,000.

On June 1, 2013, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with Principal Business Enterprise Inc. (“PBE”) to distribute NeutroPhase. NovaBay received an upfront payment of $200,000.

68

Revenue has been recognized under these agreements as follows: 

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Amortization of upfront technology and access fees

 $41  $34  $103 

Product revenue

  209   169   1,956 

Total revenue recognized

 $250  $203  $2,059 

At December 31, 2018, the Company had deferred revenue of $41 thousand that relates to unsatisfied performance obligations of sample supply due to China Pioneer and an incremental discount on future product sales due to Pioneer China. During the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company earned $41 thousand in revenue due to the Company being relieved of contract liability as a result of changes in contract terms associated with the distribution agreement with China Pioneer. The Company did not have any deferred revenue at December 31, 2019.

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

  

2020

 

Contract assets

 $-  $19  $144 
             

Contract liabilities

            

Current portion

 $4  $54  $2 

Long-term portion

 $-  $-  $- 

Total contract liabilities

 $4  $54  $2 

 

Avenova Spray Pharmacy Distribution Agreements and Specialty Pharmacies

In November 2014, the Company signed a nationwide distribution agreement for its Avenova product with McKesson Corporation (“McKesson”) as part of the Company’s commercialization strategy. McKesson makes Avenova widelySpray is made available in local pharmacies and major pharmacy retail chains across the U.S., such as Wal-Mart, Costco, CVS and Target. In January 2015, the Company signed aunder nationwide distribution agreementagreements with McKesson Corporation, Cardinal Health. In April 2015, theHealth and AmerisourceBergen. The Company has also signed a distribution agreemententered into direct agreements with AmerisourceBergen to distribute Avenova nationwide. 

Since the startpreferred pharmacy networks as part of 2019 the number of pharmacies in our Partner Pharmacy Program has increased from 4 to 14, placing us on track to increase Avenova sales through retail pharmacies from one-quarter to one-half of all sales. Our partner pharmacies provide patients with a quality experience that includes a relatively short time between receiving the initial prescription and filling it, fast refills and home delivery. The combination of a pre-negotiated price along with a reduction in coupon and rebate usage improves our gross-to-net and per-script profitability.Program. During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2022 and 2017, the revenue generated from these pharmacies comprised 21%, 1% and 0% of our total product revenue, respectively.

During the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017,2021, the Company earned $4.6 million, $11.0$0.1 million and $13.6$0.6 million,respectively, in sales revenue for its Avenova Spray product from itsthese distribution agreements and specialty pharmacies.partner pharmacy agreements.

 

Under the Avenovathese product distribution arrangements, the Company had a contract liability balance of $0.4$1.6 million and $1.4 million at as of December 31, 2019 2022 and $0.9 million as of December 31, 2018, respectively. 2021. The contract liability is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheet.sheets. The contract liability as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018 includedCompany also recorded a prepayment of $0.4 million and $0.9 million rebate, respectively,$19 thousand for rebates related to these distribution agreements as of December 31, 2021, with no such prepayment recorded in the 2022 period, that is recorded in the prepaid expenses and other current assets in the consolidated balance sheetsheets (see Note 4,5, “Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets”).

62

Over-the-Counter Sales of Avenova Direct Spray

 

In an effort to improve patient access, Avenova DirectSpray was launched online on June 1, 2019 direct to U.S. customers exclusivelycustomers. Avenova Spray is offered primarily for sale on Amazon.com. Avenova Direct isAmazon.com, the same strength hypochlorous formulation as Avenova Rx, but comes in a 20mL size. This channel offersCompany’s website (Avenova.com), Walmart.com, select CVS stores and online on CVS.com. These channels provide the Company with more stable gross-to-net pricing and providesprovide customers with easy access to our product. This model capitalizes on a trend to sell pharmaceutical products directly to consumers in response to high-deductible health plans, allowing customers to forego a time-consuming doctor visit and trip to the pharmacy. We are promoting this program through complementary social media marketing to target consumers in specific demographics, as well as to ophthalmologists, optometrists, and current and former Avenova patients. During the yearyears ended December 31, 2019,2022 and 2021, the revenue generated from Avenova DirectSpray in these channels was $1.0 million.$6.5 million and $6.6 million, respectively. 

 

DERMAdoctor Products Distribution Agreements

DERMAdoctor products are sold through distribution arrangements with third parties such as Costco and others. During the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the Company earned $0.9 million and $0.2 million, respectively, in sales revenue for its DERMAdoctor products from these distribution agreements.

Under these distribution arrangements, the Company had a contract liability balance of $0.2 million as of December 31, 2022, and $0.4 million as of December 31, 2021. The contract liability is included in accrued liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets.

 

 

NOTE 15.17. EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN

 

We haveThe Company has a 401(k)401(k) plan covering all eligible employees, and we are employees. The Company made an election to change the terms of the 401(k) plan such that, beginning on January 1, 2022, the Company elected to make a matching contribution equal to 100% of the first 3% of compensation deferred, plus 50% of the next 2% of compensation deferred. The Company contributed $125 thousand to the plan in the year ended December 31, 2022. During the year ended December 31, 2021, the Company had not required elected to contribute to the plan. For the years ended December 31, 2019401(k) plan and 2018, we made $9 thousand and $14 thousand contributions to the plan, respectively.no contributions.

69

 

 

NOTE 16.18. INCOME TAXES

 

LossFor the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, loss before provision for income taxes consisted of the following:following (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ending December 31,

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 
 

2022

  

2021

 

United States

 $(9,652) $(6,541) $(7,400) $(10,608

)

 $(5,824

)

International

               
 $(9,652) $(6,541) $(7,400) $(10,608

)

 $(5,824

)

 

TheFor the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, the federal and state income tax provision is summarized as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year Ending December

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 
 

2022

  

2021

 

Current

                

Federal

 $  $  $  $  $ 

State

  6   4   3     

Other

               

Total current tax expense

  6   4   3  $  $ 
             
             

Deferred

                

Federal

             

State

             

Other

               

Total deferred tax expense

          $  $ 
             

Income tax provision

 $6  $4  $3  $  $ 

 

Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects of (a) temporary differences between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes, and (b) operating losses and tax credit carryforwards.

 

The tax effects of significant items comprising the Company's deferred taxes as of December 31, 2019 2022 and 20182021 are as follows:follows (in thousands):

 

  

December 31

 

(in thousands)

 

2019

  

2018

 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Net operating losses

 $29,427  $26,790 

Accruals

  222   446 

Deferred revenue

     10 

Stock options

  1,191   1,425 

Other deferred tax assets

  765   716 

Property and equipment

  6   9 
Lease liability  301    

Total deferred tax assets

  31,912   29,396 
         
         

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Lease asset

  (301)   

Total deferred tax liabilities

  (301)   
         

Valuation allowance

  (31,611)  (29,396)

Net deferred taxes

 $  $ 
  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Net operating losses

  $35,234  $33,455 

Stock options

  750   884 

Research and development credits

  641   641 

Accruals

  464   306 

Operating lease liabilities

  472   19 

Property and equipment

  13   10 

Other deferred tax assets

  331   376 

Total deferred tax assets

  37,905   35,691 

Deferred tax liabilities:

Operating lease right-of-use assets

(472

)

(19

)

Total deferred tax liabilities

(472

)

(19

)

Valuation allowance

(37,433

)

(35,672

)

Net deferred taxes

$$

 

ASC 740,Income Taxes, requires that the tax benefit of net operating losses, temporary differences and credit carryforwards be recorded as an asset to the extent that management assesses that realization is "more“more likely than not."not”. Realization of the future tax benefits is dependent on the Company's ability to generate sufficient taxable income within the carryforward period. Because of the Company's recent history of operating losses, management believes that recognition of the deferred tax assets arising from the above-mentioned future tax benefits is currently not likely to be realized and, accordingly, has provided a valuation allowance.

The valuation allowance increased by $2.2$1.8 million and $2.8 million during 2019, $0.9 million during 2018, the years ended December 31, 2022 and decreased by $10.1 million during 2017.2021, respectively.

 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards as of December 31, 2019, 2022, are as follows (in thousands):

 

    

Expiration

    

Expiration

 

Amount

 

Years

 

Amount

 

Years

Net operating losses, federal (Post December 31, 2017)

 $16,151 

Do Not Expire

 $38,087 

Does Not Expire

Net operating losses, federal (Pre January 1, 2018)

 $94,886 

Beginning in 2024

 $94,886 

Beginning in 2024

Net operating losses, state

 $90,455 

Beginning in 2028

 $111,012 

Beginning in 2028

Tax credits, federal

 $1,316 

Beginning in 2026

 542 

Beginning in 2031

Tax credits, state

 $325 

Indefinite

 125 

Indefinite

 

Under Section 382 of Effective January 1, 2009, the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, ifCompany adopted a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value)new accounting standard that provides guidance on accounting for uncertainty in its equity ownership over a three year period,income taxes. The adoption had no effect on the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards and other pre-change tax attributes, such as research credits may be limited.

Company's financial statements. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances of the unrecognized tax benefits during the below years are as follows (in thousands):

 

 

Year ended December 31,

   For the Years Ended December 31, 

(in thousands)

 

2019

  

2018

 
  2022   2021 

Unrecognized benefit - beginning of period

 $974  $931 

Unrecognized benefit - beginning of period

 $974  $974 

Gross decreases - prior period tax positions

     43 

Change during the period

Change during the period

      

Unrecognized benefit - end of period

 $974  $974 

Unrecognized benefit - end of period

 $974  $974 

 

The entire amount of the unrecognized tax benefits would not impact our effective tax rate if recognized. The balance of unrecognized tax benefits increased as a result of a comprehensive analysis to substantiate the company's research and orphan drug credits. Accrued interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are classified as income tax expense and were immaterial. We do not anticipate that total unrecognized tax benefits will significantly change in the next 12 months. The Company files income tax returns in the United States and in California. Other jurisdictions are not significant. The tax years 20042019 - 20192022 remain open in the federal jurisdiction and 20062018 - 20192022 for California. The Company is not currently under examination by income tax authorities in federal, state or other jurisdictions.

 

The effective tax rate of the Company's provision (benefit) for income taxes differs from the federal statutory rate as follows:

 

  

Year Ending December 31,

 
  

2019

  

2018

  

2017

 

Statutory Rate

  21.0%  21.0%  34.0%

State Tax

  3.1%  (0.3%)  0.2%

Stock Based Compensation Expense

  (3.7%)  (4.3%)  (2.1%)

Change in Valuation Allowance

  (23.0%)  (13.0%)  141.7%

Other

  (0.3%)  (0.5%)  0.7%

Warrant/equity expenses

  1.7%  4.2%  (0.5%)

Impact of 162m

  1.1%  1.3%  (4.6%)

Tax Reform - Tax Rate Change

  0.0%  0.0%  (169.5%)

Impact of ASC 606

  0.0%  (8.5%)  0.0%

Total

  (0.1%)  (0.1%)  (0.1%)

 

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
 

2022

 

2021

 

Statutory rate

21.0

% 21.0

%

State tax

7.9% 11.2

%

Change in valuation allowance

 (48.0

%)

 (47.7

%)

Warrant/equity expenses

20.2% 16.7

%

Stock-based compensation expense

 (4.2

%)

 (1.1

%)

Other

 (0.1

%)

 (0.1

%)

Change in value of earnout3.2% 

%

Total

0.0% 0.0

%

 

 

NOTE 17.19. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Related Party Financing

See Note 9, “Related Party Notes Payable” for a description of the Promissory Note issued on February 27, 2019, as amended on June 25, 2019 and Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity” for a description of the Company’s financing transactions in June 2019 and August 2019.

 

Related Party Revenue

 

The Company recognizedfollowing table summarizes information about the Company’s related party revenues from product salesrevenue and license and collaboration feescost of $250 thousand, $77 thousand, and $27 thousand forgoods sold during the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 2022 and 2017, respectively. In fulfillment of the performance obligations under the Purchase Agreement with China Pioneer, the Company supplied product samples with a cost of $176 thousand, $426 thousand, and $102 thousand for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. These costs were recorded as a sales and marketing expense. 2021, respectively (in thousands): 

  

For the Years Ended December 31,

 
  

2022

  

2021

 

Related party revenue:

        

NeutroPhase

 $976  $368 

Total related party revenue

 $976  $368 
         

Cost of goods sold

        

NeutroPhase

 $954  $325 

Total related party expenses

 $954  $325 

Related party accounts receivable was $0$0.2 million and $39 thousand$0.1 million as of December 31, 2019 2022 and December 31, 2018, 2021, respectively. See Note 14, “License, Collaboration and Distribution Agreements” for additional information regarding the Company's distribution agreements with China Pioneer, the Company's second largest stockholder.

 

Related Party Expenses 

TheOn November 17, 2020, the Company recognized related party commission expenseentered into a consulting agreement with Eric Wu. Eric Wu is Partner and Senior Vice President of $326 thousand, $359 thousand, and $0 for the years ended December 31, 2019, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The Company paid China Kington a feeand the brother of $20 thousand, $144 thousand and $162 thousand inBob Wu, who serves on the first, second and third quarterCompany’s Board of 2019, respectively. The first quarter fee represented the broker fee for the issuance of the Promissory Note to Pioneer Hong Kong. The second quarter fee represented the commission for the private placement with three accredited investors which closed on June 26, 2019. The third quarter fee represented the commission for the private placement with three accredited investors which closed on August 8, 2019. All of the fees were recorded as an offsetDirectors. Pursuant to the additional paid-in capitalAgreement, Eric Wu acted as a consultant to the Company in the consolidated balance sheet. For the year ended December 31, 2019, $18 thousand was recorded to interest expense using the effective interest rate method over thesupport of product expansion efforts as well as in potential financings and other transaction opportunities. The term of the Promissory Note. See Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity”Agreement was for additional information regarding such commissions.

A feetwelve months. As consideration for his services, the Company granted Eric Wu options exercisable for 300,000 shares of $50the Company’s common stock (or 8,572 shares of common stock if accounting for the subsequent Reverse Stock Split) under the Company’s 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan with an exercise price equal to the Company’s closing stock price on the date of the grant (as subsequently adjusted for the Reverse Stock Split) and vesting on the one year anniversary of the grant date. Stock-based compensation expense of $152 thousand was paid to Director Bob Wu in the first quarter of 2019 and represented the consulting fees pursuant to that certain Consulting Agreement, between the Company and China Kington, dated March 11, 2019. The Company recorded an $83 thousand expense related to Mr. Wu’s consulting service for the year ended December 31, 2019. The Company paid an additional fee of $50 thousand2021 related to Mr. WuEric Wu’s options, with no stock-based compensation expense related to Eric Wu’s options recorded in March 2020 pursuant to the Consulting Agreement. See Note 9, “Related Party Notes Payable” for additional information regarding such fees.year ended December 31, 2022.

NOTE 20. SEGMENT REPORTING

 

The fees paid to China Kington duringCompany’s chief operating decision maker (“CODM”), who is the year ended December 31, 2018 represented the commissionCompany’s Chief Executive Officer, allocates resources and assesses performance based on its salefinancial information of the Company’s common stock. SeeCompany. The CODM reviews financial information presented for each reportable segment for purposes of making operating decisions and assessing financial performance.

Prior to the DERMAdoctor Acquisition in November 2021 (see Note 12, “Stockholders’ Equity” for additional3, “Business Combination”), the Company was managed as a single segment focused on commercializing Avenova Spray in the United States. After the DERMAdoctor Acquisition, the Company began managing and aggregating its operational and financial information regarding such commissions.in accordance with two reportable segments: (1) Optical & Wound Care and (2) Skin Care. The Optical & Wound Care segment consists of products historically sold by NovaBay prior to the DERMAdoctor Acquisition. The Skin Care segment consists of products acquired in the DERMAdoctor Acquisition and skincare products subsequently sold under the DERMAdoctor brand.

 

Select financial information for each segment is as follows:

 

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

  

Year

      

Year

     
  

Ended

  Percentage  

Ended

  Percentage 
  

December 31,

  

of Product

  

December 31,

  

of Product

 
  

2022

  

Revenue

  

2021

  

Revenue

 

Optical & Wound Care

 $10,239   71

%

 $9,555   94

%

Skin Care

  4,165   29

%

  649   6

%

Total sales, net

 $14,404   100

%

 $10,204   100

%

 

 

  Year      Year     
  Ended  Percentage  Ended  Percentage 
  December 31,  of Total  December 31,  of Total 
  2022  Operating Loss  2021  Operating Loss 

Optical & Wound Care

 $5,645   39

%

 $8,682   98

%

Skin Care

  8,772   61

%

  180   2

%

Total operating loss

 $14,417   100

%

 $8,862   100

%

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

 

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

 

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a-15 and 15d-15 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act)“Exchange Act”).

 

A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Assessing the costs and benefits of such controls and procedures necessarily involves the exercise of judgment by management. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected.

 

Based upon that evaluation at December 31, 2019,2022, our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to ensure, at the reasonable assurance level, that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms and were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act was accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Management's Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting.

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2022. Our management utilized the criteria set forth in "Internal“Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013)" issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to conduct an assessment of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019.2022. Our management has concluded that, as of December 31, 2019,2022, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on these criteria.

 

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

There were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting which has materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

 

ITEM 9B.

OTHER INFORMATION

 

None

 

ITEM 9B.9C.

OTHER INFORMATIONDISCLOSURE REGARDING FOREIGN JURISDICTIONS THAT PREVENT INSPECTIONS

 

None.Not applicable.

 

PART III

 

 

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

 

The information required by this item will be included in our Proxy Statement for the 20202023 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “2020“2023 Proxy Statement”) and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Unless otherwise indicated, all per share numbers have been retroactively adjusted to account for the 1-for-35 Reverse Stock Split, effective November 15, 2022. Also, effective February 16, 2023, the Board appointed Tommy Law as the Company’s Interim Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer. Mr. Law was not a named executive officer during 2022 and, as such, is not reflected in the below information.

Summary Executive Compensation Table

The following table shows information regarding the compensation earned during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 by (1) our Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel and Chief Compliance Officer, (2) our Chief Product Officer, and (3) our former Chief Financial Officer (who served for the entire fiscal year ended December 31, 2022 and then until February 15, 2023) (collectively, the “NEOs”).

Name and principal position(s)

Fiscal year

 

Salary

($)

  

Bonus

($)

  

Stock awards

($)

  

Option awards(1)

($)

  

All other compensation(2)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Justin M. Hall, Esq.

2022

 $350,000  $  $  $  $14,954  $364,954 

CEO, GC and Chief

2021

  328,667   70,000   395,000      1,854   795,521 

Compliance Officer

                         
                          

Audrey Kunin, M.D.(3)

2022

 $200,000  $  $  $  $4,395  $204,395 

Chief Product Officer

2021

  31,538      177,000   86,715      295,253 
                          

Andrew Jones(4)

2022

 $300,000  $  $  $  $14,174  $314,174 

Former Chief Financial Officer

2021

  291,667   73,500   197,500      1,854   564,521 


(1)         These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of the equity awards granted to the Company’s NEOs during the fiscal year. The aggregate grant date fair value is computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, excluding the effect of estimated forfeitures. See Note 15, “Equity-Based Compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report, regarding assumptions underlying the valuation of the Company’s equity awards. These amounts do not correspond to the actual value that may be recognized by the Company’s NEOs.

(2)         In 2021 the amounts included individual life insurance premiums paid for by the Company. In 2022 the amounts included individual life insurance premiums paid for by the Company for Mr. Hall and Mr. Jones of $1,909 each, and 401(k) plan matching contributions paid for by the Company for Mr. Hall, Dr. Audrey Kunin and Mr. Jones of $13,045, $4,395 and $12,265, respectively.

(3)         Dr. Audrey Kunin was appointed our Chief Product Officer effective November 5, 2021, and therefore 2021 compensation only reflects a partial year.

(4)         Mr. Jones served as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer for the entire fiscal years ended December 31, 2021 and 2022. Subsequently, Mr. Jones resigned as the Company’s Chief Financial Officer, effective as of February 15, 2023.

2022 and 2021 Base Salaries and Target Bonus Amounts

The Compensation Committee did not recommend any increases to executive salaries or target bonus amounts for 2022; they remained the same as 2021. For Mr. Hall, this was a 2022 base salary of $350,000 and a target bonus percentage of base salary of 50%. For Mr. Jones, this was a 2022 base salary of $300,000 and a target bonus percentage of base salary of 35%.

Previously in 2021, the Compensation Committee approved increases to Messrs. Hall’s and Jones’ annual base salary and target bonus amounts to be effective as of May 1, 2021. As compared to 2020, the base salary of Mr. Hall increased from $286,000 to $350,000 and his target bonus percentage of base salary increased from 40% to 50%. As compared to 2020, the base salary of Mr. Jones increased from $275,000 to $300,000 and his target bonus percentage of base salary increased from 30% to 35%.

2022 and 2021 Cash Bonuses

The Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, determined not to award any bonuses to its NEOs for fiscal year 2022 performance.

Previously, the Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, awarded Mr. Hall and Mr. Jones a bonus of $70,000 and $73,500, respectively, for fiscal year 2021 performance. Dr. Audrey Kunin was not awarded a bonus for fiscal year 2021 due to her beginning date of service on November 5, 2021.

2022 Equity Awards

The Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, determined it would not grant any equity awards for the 2022 fiscal year to any of its NEOs.

2021 Equity Awards

On May 4, 2021, the Compensation Committee granted performance restricted stock units (“Performance RSUs”) to Messrs. Hall and Jones in the amount of 14,286 Performance RSUs and 7,143 Performance RSUs, respectively. Subsequently, on November 5, 2021, Dr. Audrey Kunin was granted 8,572 Performance RSUs in relation to her employment agreement (as described in more detail below).

The Performance RSUs are designed to align each executive’s total direct compensation with the long-term interests of the Company and its stockholders by further linking compensation to performance. The Performance RSUs represent the right to receive a number of shares of the Company’s common stock on a one-to-one basis with the number of Performance RSUs granted, subject to the Company's achievement of certain performance goals set forth in the award agreement. Under the Performance RSUs, the awards will vest based on the achievement of three performance goals as determined by the Compensation Committee at the end of the performance period ending December 31, 2023.

The Performance RSUs are tied to three categories of performance goals to be achieved during the performance period, which will be equally weighted at the end of the performance period: (1) 1/3 of the Performance RSUs will be earned if the Company’s revenue meets a threshold amount for a trailing 12 month period; (2) 1/3 of the Performance RSUs will be earned if the Company achieves a threshold amount of cash flow for at least two consecutive quarters; and (3) 1/3 of the Performance RSUs will be earned if the Company achieves a threshold market capitalization for twenty consecutive trading days.

The Performance RSUs will only vest upon the achievement of the performance goals as determined by the Compensation Committee at the end of the performance period, subject, in general, to the executive's continuous employment with the Company through the end of the performance period; provided, however, an executive will be entitled to a pro-rated portion of the award in the event that his employment ceases upon his death or permanent disability. Further, if a change in control of the Company occurs, the Performance RSUs will immediately vest, even if the performance goals have not been met, and be settled in the form of consideration consistent with the terms of the change in control. Mr. Jones’ Performance RSUs were subsequently forfeited upon his resignation, effective February 15, 2023.

On November 5, 2021, Dr. Audrey Kunin was also granted 4,286 stock options in relation to her employment agreement (as described in more detail below). Such stock options vest over a two (2) year period (with 50% of the options having vested on the one-year anniversary of Dr. Audrey Kunin’s first day of employment and the remaining 50% of the stock options to vest on the two (2) year anniversary of Dr. Audrey Kunin’s employment immediately prior to the expiration of the term of her employment agreement).

Federal Income Tax Law

Federal income tax law prohibits publicly held companies, such as the Company, from deducting compensation paid to a NEO that exceeds $1 million during the tax year. Prior to the adoption of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (“Tax Act”), to the extent that compensation was based upon the attainment of performance goals set by the Compensation Committee pursuant to plans approved by the stockholders, the compensation was exempted from the $1 million deduction limit. The Tax Act repealed this exemption, and now compensation paid to NEOs in excess of $1 million is no longer deductible, even if performance-based. The Compensation Committee intends to continue to use performance metrics in compensation when it is in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders even if such compensation is not deductible for tax purposes.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table presents the outstanding equity awards held by each of our NEOs as of December 31, 2022. Stock options were granted pursuant to our 2007 Plan thereafter until its expiration in March 2017, and all awards since then have been pursuant to our 2017 Plan. The options granted under our 2007 Plan and 2017 Plan are not exercisable until they have vested.

    

Option Awards

  

Stock Awards

 

Name

 

Grant date

 

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

exercisable(1)

  

Number of securities underlying unexercised options

(#)

unexercisable(1)

  

Option

exercise price

($)

  

Option expiration

date

  

Number

of shares

or units

of stock

that have

not

vested (#)

  

Market

value of

shares

or units

of stock

that

have not

vested

($)

  

Equity

incentive

plan

awards:

number of unearned

shares,

units or

other

rights that

have not

vested

(#)

   

Equity

incentive

plan

awards:

market or payout

value of unearned

shares,

units or

other

rights that

have not

vested

($)

 

Justin M. Hall, Esq.

 

05/04/21

       $        $   14,286(2)  $395,000 
  

08/20/20

  5,625   4,375  $34.65  

08/20/30

     $      $ 
  

05/31/18

  5,429     $77.00  

05/31/28

     $      $ 
  

01/25/17

  613(3)    $126.00  

01/25/27

     $      $ 
  

06/06/16

  3,715(4)    $97.30  

06/06/26

     $      $ 
  

10/01/15

  58     $236.25  

10/01/25

     $      $ 
  

09/26/14

  35     $626.25  

09/26/24

     $      $ 
  

09/26/13

  22     $1,496.25  

09/26/23

     $      $ 
  

02/01/13

  35     $1,067.50  

02/01/23

     $      $ 
                                    

Audrey Kunin, M.D.

 

11/05/21

                    8,572(2)  $177,000 
  

11/05/21

  2,143   2,143(5) $19.60                 
                                    

Andrew Jones(6)

 

05/04/21

       $        $   7,143(2)  $197,500 
  

08/20/20

  402   313  $34.65  

08/20/30

                  
  

05/04/20

  5,358   3,214  $36.05  

05/04/30

                  

_________________

(1)         Unless otherwise noted, each option vests as to 25% of the shares underlying the option on the first anniversary of the grant date, with the remainder vesting every three months in 12 equal installments thereafter. Options expire ten (10) years from the date of grant.

(2)         Under the Performance RSUs, the awards will vest based on the achievement of three performance goals as determined by the Compensation Committee at the end of the performance period ending December 31, 2023, as described in further detail above.

(3)         Mr. Hall was granted 4,086 stock options to vest on January 31, 2018, in direct proportion to the percentage achievement of the stated 2017 corporate goals, as approved and determined by the Board. Such determination resulted in a 15% payout, or 613 shares vesting.

(4)         Mr. Hall was granted 3,715 stock options to vest on January 31, 2017, in direct proportion to the percentage achievement of the stated 2016 corporate goals, as approved and determined by the Board, which was 100%.

(5)         Dr. Audrey Kunin was granted 4,286 stock options, half of which vested on November 5, 2022, and the other half which will vest on November 5, 2023.

(6)         Mr. Jones’ Performance RSUs and unvested options were subsequently forfeited upon his resignation, effective February 15, 2023.

Employment-Related Agreements and Potential Payments upon Termination or Change in Control

On January 31, 2020 and November 5, 2021, the Company entered into an employment agreement with each of Mr. Hall and Dr. Audrey Kunin, respectively, in connection with their respective appointments to serve as an executive officer. Mr. Hall’s employment agreement was subsequently amended on January 26, 2022. Mr. Jones was party to an employment agreement, dated May 4, 2020, prior to his resignation from the Company on February 15, 2023.

The principal terms of our NEOs’ employment agreements (including Mr. Jones, whose employment agreement was effective throughout the 2022 fiscal year) are summarized below.

Justin Hall

Mr. Hall’s employment agreement, as amended, provides for at-will employment and a term commencing on January 31, 2020 and ending on December 31, 2023 unless earlier terminated. Mr. Hall’s employment agreement originally provided for an annual base salary of two hundred eighty-six thousand dollars ($286,000), subject to annual review and increases determined by the Compensation Committee and/or Board (such amount, the “Hall Base Salary”).

In addition, Mr. Hall shall be eligible for any bonus plan that is deemed appropriate by the Board. The bonus amount shall be determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, based upon factors, including: (i) the fulfillment, during the relevant year, of specific milestones and tasks delegated, for such year, to the executive as set by the executive and the Company’s Board, before the end of the first calendar quarter; (ii) the evaluation of the executive by the Company’s Board; (iii) the Company’s financial, product and expected progress; and (iv) other pertinent matters relating to the Company’s business and valuation. Any bonus will be payable within two and a half (21/2) months following the end of the year for which the bonus was earned. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors shall have the sole discretion to pay any or all of the annual bonus in the form of equity compensation. Any such equity compensation shall be issued from the Company’s equity incentive plan, and shall be fully vested upon issuance.

In the event the Company terminates Mr. Hall for cause (as defined in the employment agreement), he shall be entitled to any earned but unpaid wages or other compensation (including reimbursements of his outstanding expenses and unused vacation) earned through the termination date.

In the event the Company terminates Mr. Hall without cause (including death, disability or for constructive termination) (each as defined in the employment agreement) which is not in connection with a change of control, provided such termination constitutes a “separation from service” as such term is defined in Section 409A of the Code and, subject to his execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company, he shall be entitled to an amount equal to the Hall Base Salary in effect on the date of separation from service plus the full target annual bonus percentage for the current fiscal year (the “Hall Severance Amount”). The Hall Severance Amount will be paid in twelve (12) equal consecutive monthly installments at the monthly rate of the Hall Base Salary rate in effect at the time of his termination, with such installments commencing within sixty (60) days following the executive’s separation from service. The Hall Severance Amount shall be in addition to Mr. Hall’s earned wages and other compensation (including reimbursements of his outstanding expenses and unused vacation) through the date his employment is terminated from the Company.

In the event the Company terminates Mr. Hall without cause in connection with a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), he shall be entitled to a Change of Control Severance (the “Hall CoC Severance Amount”) in place of the Hall Severance Amount described above. The Hall CoC Severance Amount shall be: (i) an amount equal to twice the Hall Base Salary and (ii) an amount equal to the cash portion of his target Annual Bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs (with it deemed that all performance goals have been met at one hundred percent (100%) of budget or plan) multiplied by one hundred fifty percent (150%). For a period of eighteen (18) months, Mr. Hall may elect coverage for, and the Company shall reimburse him for, the amount of his premium payments for group health coverage, if any, elected by the executive pursuant to the Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1985, as amended (“COBRA”); provided, however, that Mr. Hall shall be solely responsible for all matters relating to his continuation of coverage pursuant to COBRA, including (without limitation) his election of such coverage and his timely payment of premiums.

Moreover, all outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Hall will be subject to full accelerated vesting on the date of termination without cause, in both the standard Hall Severance Amount and the Hall CoC Severance Amount, and the exercise period shall be extended to three (3) years from the date of termination. In order to terminate Mr. Hall for cause (or for Mr. Hall to resign for constructive termination), the acting party shall give notice to the other party specifying the reason for termination and providing a period of thirty (30) days to cure the reason specified. If there is no cure within thirty (30) days or the notified party earlier refuses to effect the cure, the termination shall then be deemed effective.

Dr. Audrey Kunin

Dr. Audrey Kunin’s employment agreement provides for at-will employment and a two-year term commencing on November 5, 2021. Her employment agreement provides for an annual base salary of $200,000 (“Kunin Base Salary”). Additionally, Dr. Audrey Kunin’s employment agreement included an equity grant of 8,572 Performance RSUs and a stock option award of 150,000 shares, as further described above.

Dr. Audrey Kunin’s employment agreement also provides her with the opportunity to earn an annual performance bonus (“Kunin Annual Bonus”) in an amount up to one hundred percent (100%) of the Kunin Base Salary. For the Kunin Annual Bonus, sixty percent (60%) of the total amount of the Kunin Annual Bonus shall be determined by the Board in its sole discretion, based upon the following factors: (i) the fulfillment, during the relevant year, of specific milestones and tasks delegated, for such year, to Dr. Audrey Kunin as set by Dr. Audrey Kunin and the Company and/or its authorized representative; (ii) the evaluation of Dr. Audrey Kunin by the Company and/or its authorized representative; (iii) DERMAdoctor’s financial, product and expected progress; and (iv) other pertinent matters relating to DERMAdoctor’s business and valuation. Dr. Audrey Kunin shall also be entitled to the remaining portion of the Kunin Annual Bonus of up to forty percent (40%) of the Kunin Base Salary, as considered and approved by the Board in its sole discretion, upon meeting certain performance metrics related to the Membership Unit Purchase Agreement entered into in connection with the DERMAdoctor Acquisition. Any bonus to Dr. Audrey Kunin will be payable within seventy-four (74) days following the end of the year for which such bonus was earned. Upon the mutual agreement of Dr. Audrey Kunin and the Board, any or all of the Kunin Annual Bonus may be paid in the form of equity compensation. Any such equity compensation shall be issued from the Company’s equity incentive plan, and shall be fully vested upon payment.

In the event that Dr. Audrey Kunin is terminated for cause (as defined in her employment agreement) or such employment is terminated due to her death or disability, she shall be entitled to any earned but unpaid wages or other compensation (including reimbursements of her outstanding expenses and unused vacation) earned through the termination date. In the event that Dr. Audrey Kunin is terminated without cause (as defined in her employment agreement), she shall execute a release of claims in favor of the Company, be entitled to an amount equal to the Kunin Base Salary in effect on the date of separation from service plus the full target Annual Bonus percentage of the then current fiscal year (with it deemed that all performance goals have been met at 100% of budget or plan) (the “Kunin Severance Amount”), which will be paid in twelve (12) equal consecutive monthly installments. The Kunin Severance Amount shall be in addition to Dr. Audrey Kunin’s earned wages and other compensation (including reimbursements of her outstanding expenses and unused vacation) through the date her employment is terminated. Further, in the event that Dr. Audrey Kunin is terminated for cause, she and the other applicable parties will no longer be entitled to the earn out payments provided for in the Membership Unit Purchase Agreement entered into in connection with the DERMAdoctor Acquisition; however, if Dr. Audrey Kunin is terminated without cause or terminated as a result of death or disability, she and the other applicable parties will remain entitled to the earn out payments.

Moreover, in the event of either a termination without cause, and subject to her execution of a release, all outstanding equity awards then held by Dr. Audrey Kunin will be subject to full accelerated vesting on the date of termination, and the exercise period shall be extended to three (3) years from the date of termination.

Andrew Jones

As a result of Mr. Jones’ resignation, effective February 15, 2023, his employment agreement terminated on the same day. Due to Mr. Jones’ resignation being voluntary, he was not entitled to either the Jones Severance Amount or the Jones CoC Severance Amount (each as described below).

Mr. Jones’ employment agreement provided for at-will employment and a term commencing on May 4, 2020. The employment agreement included an original annual base salary of two hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($275,000), subject to annual review and increases determined by the Compensation Committee (such amount, the “Jones Base Salary”), as well as an initial equity grant of 4,572 restricted stock units and an initial stock option award of 8,572 shares, as further described above.

In addition, Mr. Jones had the opportunity to earn an annual performance bonus in an amount up to thirty percent (30%) of the Jones Base Salary, with such maximum amount subject to increases determined by the Compensation Committee and/or Board (the “Annual Bonus”). The Annual Bonus amount was to be determined by the Board, in its sole discretion, based upon the following factors: (i) the fulfillment, during the relevant year, of specific milestones and tasks delegated, for such year, to Mr. Jones as set by Mr. Jones and the Company’s CEO and/or the Board, before the end of the first calendar quarter (or the first three months of his employment, as appropriate); (ii) the evaluation of Mr. Jones by the Company’s CEO and/or the Board; (iii) the Company’s financial, product and expected progress; and (iv) other pertinent matters relating to the Company’s business and valuation. Any bonus would have been payable within two and a half (2 ½) months following the end of the year for which the bonus was earned. The Committee had the sole discretion to pay any or all of the Annual Bonus in the form of equity compensation, except to the extent that the Annual Bonus was paid in connection with a Jones Severance Amount (as defined below) or a Jones CoC Severance Amount (as defined below). Any such equity compensation would have been issued from the Company’s equity incentive plan, and would have been fully vested upon payment.

In the event the Company terminated Mr. Jones for cause (as defined in the employment agreement), he would have been entitled to any earned but unpaid wages or other compensation (including reimbursements of his outstanding expenses and unused vacation) earned through the termination date. In the event the Company terminated Mr. Jones without cause (including death, disability, or for constructive termination) (each as defined in the employment agreement), which is not in connection with a change of control, he would have been, subject to his execution of a release of claims in favor of the Company, entitled to an amount equal to the Jones Base Salary in effect on the date of separation from service plus the full target Annual Bonus percentage of the then current fiscal year (with it deemed that all performance goals have been met at 100% of budget or plan) (the “Jones Severance Amount”), which would have paid in twelve (12) equal consecutive monthly installments. The Jones Severance Amount would have been in addition to Mr. Jones’ earned wages and other compensation (including reimbursements of his outstanding expenses and unused vacation) through the termination date.

In the event the Company terminated Mr. Jones without cause in connection with a change of control (as defined in the employment agreement), he would have been entitled to a Change of Control Severance (the “Jones CoC Severance Amount”) in place of the Jones Severance Amount described above. The Jones CoC Severance Amount would have been: (i) an amount equal to twice the Jones Base Salary in effect on the date of separation from service and (ii) an amount equal to the cash portion of Mr. Jones’ target Annual Bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurred (with it deemed that all performance goals had been met at one hundred percent (100%) of budget or plan) multiplied by one hundred fifty percent (150%). For a period of eighteen (18) months, Mr. Jones would have had the option to elect coverage for, and the Company would have reimbursed Mr. Jones for, the amount of his premium payments for group health coverage, if any, elected by Mr. Jones pursuant to the COBRA; provided, however, that Mr. Jones would be solely responsible for all matters relating to his continuation of coverage pursuant to COBRA, including (without limitation) his election of such coverage and his timely payment of premiums.

Moreover, in the event of either a termination without cause or a termination in connection with a change of control, all outstanding equity awards held by Mr. Jones would have been subject to full accelerated vesting on the date of termination, and the exercise period extended to three (3) years from the date of termination. In order for Mr. Jones to resign for constructive termination, Mr. Jones would have had to give notice to the Company within thirty (30) days of the initial existence of such grounds for constructive termination and provided a period of thirty (30) days to cure the reason specified.

Director Compensation

The compensation and benefits for service as non-employee members of our Board is determined by the Board. Directors employed by the Company, such as Mr. Hall and Dr. Audrey Kunin, are not compensated for service on the Board or any committee of the Board; however, we reimburse all directors for any out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attending meetings of the Board and committees of the Board.

The Board, upon the recommendation of the Compensation Committee, approved the Non-Employee Director Compensation Program, effective January 1, 2022 (the “2022 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan”). Under the 2022 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan, each director receives his or her annual retainer compensation in cash and an annual grant of 858 restricted stock units. All cash compensation is payable quarterly on the first (1st) business day of the quarter.

Approved non-employee director compensation for 2022 was as follows:

ITEM 11.Board Meetings

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATIONChair of Committees

All Other Committee Members

Chair of the Board: Annual cash compensation of $52,000 per year.

Member of the Board: The annual fee consists of: (i) $40,000 in cash and (ii) 858 restricted stock units granted. The restricted stock units are granted at the Company’s Annual Meeting of Stockholders, and vest on the one year anniversary of the grant date.

Chair of the Audit Committee: Annual cash compensation of $17,500 per year.

Chair of the Compensation Committee: Annual cash compensation of $13,000 per year.

Chair of the N&CG Committee: Annual cash compensation of $10,000 per year.

Member of the Audit Committee: Annual cash compensation of $7,500 per year.

Member of the Compensation Committee: Annual cash compensation of $6,000 per year for each committee.

Member of the N&CG Committee: Annual cash compensation of $5,000 per year for each committee.

Non-employee directors also may be granted additional awards under our equity incentive plans at the discretion of our Board.

The compensation received during 2022 by each non-employee director is set forth below:

Name

 

Fees Earned

or Paid in

Cash ($)

  

Stock

Awards(1)

($)

  

Total

($)

 

Paul E. Freiman, Ph.D.

 $77,500  $5,490  $82,990 
             

Julie Garlikov

 $37,204  $5,490  $42,694 
             

Swan Sit

 $58,500  $5,490  $63,990 
             

Mijia (Bob) Wu, M.B.A.

 $40,000  $5,490  $45,490 
             

Sean Zheng

 $37,204  $5,490  $42,694 
             

Yenyou (Jeff) Zheng, Ph.D.

 $73,500  $5,490  $78,990 


(1)   These amounts represent the aggregate grant date fair value of $6.399 per share (as adjusted to account for the Reverse Stock Split) for the 858 restricted stock awards granted to each director as part of his or her annual fee in fiscal year 2022. The assumptions used to determine the value of restricted stock units are described in Note 15, “Equity-Based Compensation” to the Company’s consolidated financial statements in our Annual Report. At December 31, 2022, each of Dr. Freiman, Ms. Garlikov, Ms. Sit, Mr. Wu, Mr. Sean Zheng and Dr. Jeff Zheng had an aggregate of 858 unvested restricted stock units. At December 31, 2022, the aggregate number of vested stock options for each of the non-employee directors who served in 2022 and held stock options was as follows (with no such director holding any unvested stock options at such time): Dr. Freiman, 3,399; Ms. Sit, 572; Mr. Wu, 1,580; and Dr. Jeff Zheng, 572.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The information required by this item will be included in the 20202023 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 12.

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

 

The information required by this item will be included in the 20202023 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

73

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

 

The information required by this item will be included in the 20202023 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

 

The information required by this item will be included in the 2020 Proxy Statement and is incorporated herein by reference.

PART IV

 

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

 

(a) Documents filed as part of this report:

 

(1)Financial Statements. The financial statements listed in the Index for Item 8 hereof are filed as part of this report.

(2)Financial Statement Schedules. All schedules have been omitted because they are not required or the required information is included in our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto.

(3)Exhibits. The following exhibits are filed as part of this Report:

 

 

 

Incorporation by Reference

Filed

Herewith

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File

Number

Exhibit/

Form 8-K Item

Reference

Filing Date

 

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

10-K

001-33678

3.1

3/21/2018

 

3.2

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

8-K

001-33678

3.1

6/04/2018

 

3.3

Bylaws

8-K

001-33678

3.2

6/29/2010

 

4.1

Form of 2011 Warrant, as amended (issued pursuant to the placement agent agreement dated June 29, 2011, as amended)

10-K

001-33678

4.1

3/23/2017

 

4.2

Form of Warrant issued in March 2015 Offering, as amended (issued with 15-month term)

10-K

001-33678

4.2

3/23/2017

 

4.3

Form of Warrant issued in March 2015 Offering, as amended (issued with 5-year term)

10-K

001-33678

4.3

3/23/2017

 

4.4

Form of Warrant issued in October 2015 offering, as amended

10-K

001-33678

4.5

3/23/2017

 

4.5

Form of 2019 Domestic Warrant issued in August 2019 

8-K

001-33678

4.1

8/9/2019

 

4.6

Form of 2019 Foreign Warrant issued in August 2019

8-K

001-33678

4.2

8/9/2019

 

4.7

Form of Warrant in June 2019 offering

8-K

001-33678

4.2

6/19/2019

 

 10.1+

Indemnity Agreement (Form of Indemnity Agreement between the Company and its Directors and Officers)

10-Q

001-33678

10.1

8/12/2010

  

 10.2+NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2005 Stock Option Plan

S-1

as amended

333-14071410.23/30/2007 
10.3+NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated)S-8333-21568099.11/24/2017 

74

10.4+

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

S-8

333-218469

99.1

6/02/2017

 

 10.5+

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Form Agreements to the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan)

S-8

333-218469

99.2

6/02/2017

 

10.6+

Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan

8-K

001-33678

10.1

10/11/2018

 

10.7+

Executive Employment Agreement (Employment Agreement of Justin M. Hall)

8-K

001-33678

10.1

2/6/2020

 

10.8+

Executive Employment Agreement (Employment Agreement of Jason Raleigh)

8-K

001-33678

10.2

2/6/2020

 

10.9

Office Lease between EmeryStation Associates II, LLC (Landlord) and NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tenant), EmeryStation North

 S-1,

as amended

333-140714

10.10

3/30/2007

 

10.10

Fifth Amendment to Lease between EmeryStation Office II, LLC (Landlord) and NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tenant), EmeryStation North Project

10-K

001-33678

10.20

3/14/2008

 

10.11

Sixth Amendment to Lease between EmeryStation Office II, LLC (Landlord) and NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tenant), EmeryStation North Project

10-Q,

as amended

001-33678

10.1

11/14/2008

 

10.12

Seventh Amendment to Lease between EmeryStation Office II, LLC (Landlord) and NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tenant), EmeryStation North Project

 10-Q

001-33678

10.2

8/09/2012

 

10.13

Eighth Amendment to Lease between EmeryStation Office II, LLC (Landlord) and NovaCal Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (Tenant), EmeryStation North Project

10-K

001-33678

10.19

3/04/2016

 

10.14

Office Lease (between the Company and KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC)

8-K

001-33678

10.1

8/26/2016

 

10.15

Sublease Agreement by and between NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Zymergen, Inc., dated July 11, 2016

8-K

001-33678

10.1

7/15/2016

 

10.16

Collaboration and License Agreement by and between NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Galderma S.A.

10-Q,

as amended

001-33678

  

10.2

  

8/04/2009

 

10.17

Amendment No. 1 to the Collaboration and License Agreement

10-K

001-33678

10.18

3/30/2010

 

10.18

Amendment No. 2 to the Collaboration and License Agreement

10-K

001-33678

10.24

3/10/2011

 

10.19†

International Distribution Agreement (by and between the Company and Pioneer Pharma Co. Ltd.)

10-K

001-33678

 10.18

3/27/2012

 

10.20

Commission structure for warrant exercise

8-K

001-33678

Item 1.01

9/30/2016

 

10.21

Promissory Note Payable to Pioneer Pharma (Hong Kong) Company Limited, dated February 27, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.1

3/01/2019

 
10.22First Amendment to the Promissory Note (payable to Pioneer Pharma (Hong Kong) Company Limited), dated June 25, 20198-K001-3367810.16/26/2019 
10.23Security Agreement with China Kington Asset Management Co. Ltd., dated February 27, 2019 (in connection with the Promissory Note of the same date)8-K001-3367810.23/01/2019 
10.24Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and Iliad Research and Trading, L.P., dated March 26, 20198-K001-3367810.23/28/2019 
 

Incorporation by Reference

Filed

Herewith

Exhibit

Number

Exhibit Description

Form

File

Number

Exhibit/

Form 8-K

Item

Reference

Filing

Date

 

2.1

Membership Unit Purchase Agreement dated September 27, 2021, by and among the Company, DERMAdoctor, the Founders and the Sellers (as defined therein)

8-K

001-3678

2.1

9/28/2021

 

3.1

Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

10-K

001-33678

3.1

3/21/2018

 

3.2

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation

8-K

001-33678

3.1

6/04/2018

 

3.3

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended

8-K

001-33678

3.1

5/28/2020

 

3.4

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, dated May 24, 2021

8-K

001-33678

3.1

5/24/2021

 

3.5

Amendment to the Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, dated January 31, 2022

8-K

001-33678

3.1

2/1/2022

 

3.6

Certificate of Designation for the Series B Preferred Stock

8-K

001-33678

3.1

11/1/2021

 

3.7

Amendment to Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended, dated November 14, 2022

8-K

001-33678

3.1

11/18/2022

 

3.8

Certificate of Designation for the Series C Preferred Stock

8-K

001-33678

3.2

11/18/2022

 

3.9

Amended and Restated Bylaws

10-K

001-33678

3.7

3/29/2022

 

4.1

Description of Securities

    

X

4.2

Form of Warrant pursuant to the Services Agreement with TLF Bio Innovation Lab, LLC, dated May 13, 2020

8-K

001-33678

4.1

5/18/2020

 

4.3

Form of July 2020 Warrant

8-K

001-33678

4.1

7/21/2020

 

4.4

Form of Amended July 2020 Warrant

8-K

001-33678

4.1

9/13/2022

 

4.5

Form of Amended November 2021 Warrant

8-K

001-33678

4.2

9/13/2022

 

4.6

Form of September 2022 Warrant (2020 participants)

8-K

001-33678

4.3

9/13/2022

 

4.7

Form of September 2022 Warrant (2021 participants)

8-K

001-33678

4.4

9/13/2022

 

4.8

Form of Series A-1 Long-Term Warrant

8-K

001-33678

4.5

9/13/2022

 

4.9

Form of Series A-2 Short-Term Warrant

8-K

001-33678

4.6

9/13/2022

 

10.1

Director and Officer Indemnity Agreement

10-K

001-33678

10.1

3/29/2022

 

10.2+

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (as amended and restated)

S-8

333-215680

99.1

1/24/2017

 

10.3+

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan

S-8

333-218469

99.1

6/02/2017

 

10.4+

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan (Form Agreements to the 2017 Omnibus Incentive Plan)

S-8

333-218469

99.2

6/02/2017

 

10.5+

Executive Employment Agreement (Employment Agreement of Justin M. Hall)

8-K

001-33678

10.1

2/6/2020

 

 

 

10.6+

First Amendment to the Executive Employment Agreement with Justin M. Hall, dated January 26, 2022

8-K

001-33678

10.6

1/28/2022

 

10.7+*

Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with Mr. Justin Hall

10-Q

001-33678

10.1

5/6/2021

 

10.8+

Executive Employment Agreement (Employment Agreement of Andrew D. Jones)

8-K

001-33678

10.8

5/5/2020

 

10.9+*

Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with Mr. Andrew Jones

10-Q

001-33678

10.2

5/6/2021

 

10.10+

Executive Employment Agreement with Dr. Audrey Kunin, dated November 5, 2021

8-K

001-33678

10.1

11/12/2021

 

10.11+

Side Letter with Dr. Audrey Kunin, dated November 5, 2021

8-K

001-33678

10.3

11/12/2021

 

10.12+*

Performance Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement with Dr. Audrey Kunin

8-K

001-33678

10.4

11/12/2021

 

10.13+

Executive Employment Agreement with Dr. Jeff Kunin, dated November 5, 2021

8-K

001-33678

10.2

11/12/2021

 

10.14+

Consulting Agreement between the Company and Eric Wu, dated November 17, 2020

8-K

001-33678

10.1

11/18/2020

 

10.15+

2023 Non-Employee Director Compensation Plan

    

X

10.16

Office Lease (between the Company and KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC)

8-K

001-33678

10.1

8/26/2016

 

10.17

First Amendment to Office Lease by and between the Company and KBSIII Towers at Emeryville, LLC, dated January 24, 2022

8-K

001-33678

10.2

1/28/2022

 

10.18†

International Distribution Agreement (by and between the Company and Pioneer Pharma Co. Ltd.)

10-K

001-33678

10.18

3/27/2012

 

10.19

At the Market Offering Agreement between the Company and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., dated May 14, 2021

8-K

001-33678

1.1

5/14/2021

 

10.20

Paycheck Protection Program Promissory Note and Agreement, dated May 3, 2020, between the Company and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

10-Q

001-33678

10.28

5/7/2020

 

10.21

Form of Exercise Agreement with Holders of 2019 Domestic Warrants

8-K

001-33678

10.1

7/21/2020

 

10.22

Form of Exercise Agreement with Holders of 2019 Foreign Warrants

8-K

001-33678

10.2

7/21/2020

 

10.23

Form of Reprice Agreement with Ladenburg

8-K

001-33678

10.3

7/21/2020

 

10.24

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated October 29, 2021

8-K

001-33678

1.1

11/01/2021

 

10.25

10.25

Secured Convertible Promissory Note from the Company to Iliad Research and Trading, L.P., dated March 26, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.3

3/28/2019

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement, dated October 29, 2021

8-K

001-33678

10.1

11/01/2021

 

10.26

10.26

Security Agreement between the Company and Iliad Research and Trading, L.P., dated March 26, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.4

3/28/2019

 

Form of 2020 Warrant Reprice Letter Agreement, dated September 9, 2022

8-K

001-33678

10.1

9/13/2022

 

10.27

10.27

Consulting Agreement between the Company and China Kington, dated March 1, 2019

10-K, as amended

001-33678

10.31

3/29/2019

 

Form of 2021 Warrant Reprice Letter Agreement, dated September 9, 2022

8-K

001-33678

10.2

9/13/2022

 

10.28

10.28

Common Stock Purchase Agreement between the Company and Triton Funds LP, dated March 29, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.1

4/01/2019

 

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement, dated September 9, 2022

8-K

001-33678

10.3

9/13/2022

 

10.29

10.29

Registration Rights Agreement between the Company and Triton Funds, LP, dated March 29, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.2

4/01/2019

 

Form of Registration Rights Agreement

8-K

001-33678

10.4

9/13/2022

 

10.30

10.30

Letter Agreement between the Company and Triton Funds LLC, dated March 29, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.3

4/01/2019

 

Form of Participant Voting Commitment

8-K

001-33678

10.5

9/13/2022

 

10.31

10.31

Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and certain named purchasers, dated June 17, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.1

6/19/2019

 

Form of Additional Voting Commitment

8-K

001-33678

10.6

9/13/2022

 

10.32

10.32

Placement Agency Agreement between the Company and Ladenburg Thalmann & Co. Inc., dated August 8, 2019

8-K

001-33678

1.1

8/9/2019

 

Form of Leak-Out Agreement

8-K

001-33678

10.7

9/13/2022

 

10.33

Form of Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and certain named domestic purchasers, dated August 8, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.1

8/9/2019

 

10.34

Securities Purchase Agreement between the Company and certain named foreign purchasers, dated August 8, 2019

8-K

001-33678

10.2

8/9/2019

 

23Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm  X

10.33+

Consulting Agreement between the Company and Andrew Jones, dated February 15, 2023    

X

21

Subsidiaries of the Company

    

X

23.1

Consent of WithumSmith+Brown PC

    

X

31.1

31.1

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

 

 

X

Certification of the Principal Executive Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

    

X

31.2

31.2

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

 

 

X

Certification of the Principal Financial Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)

    

X

32.1

32.1

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

 

X

Certification by the Chief Executive Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

    

X

32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

 

 

X

101.INS

XBRL Instance Document

 

 

X

101.SCH

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 

 

 

X

101.CAL

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

 

 

X

101.DEF

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

 

 

X

101.LAB

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

 

 

X

101.PRE

XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

 

 

X

 

 

32.2

Certification by the Chief Financial Officer of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., as required by Rule 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) and Section 1350 of Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code (18 U.S.C. 1350)

X

101.INS

Inline XBRL Instance Document

X

101.SCH

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema Document 

X

101.CAL

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase Document

X

101.DEF

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

X

101.LAB

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Labels Linkbase Document

X

101.PRE

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase Document

X

104

The Cover Page Interactive Data File, formatted in Inline XBRL (included within the Exhibit 101 attachments)

X

+

Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement

NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc. has been granted confidential treatment with respect to certain portions of this exhibit (indicated by asterisks), which have been separately filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

*

Certain confidential portions of this exhibit were omitted by means of marking such portions with brackets because the confidential portions (i) are not material and (ii) would be competitively harmful if publicly disclosed.

ITEM 15.

FORM 10-K SUMMARY

None.

 

 

SIGNATURES

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report on Form 10-K to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

Date: March 26, 202031, 2023

By:

/s/   Justin Hall 

Justin Hall 

 President and Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel and Director

(principal executive officer)

 

Date: March 26, 202031, 2023

By:

/s/   Jason Raleigh Tommy Law

 Jason Raleigh Tommy Law

Interim Chief Financial Officer

(principal financial officer)

 

 

POWER OF ATTORNEY

 

We, the undersigned officers and directors of NovaBay Pharmaceuticals, Inc., do hereby constitute and appoint Justin Hall and Jason Raleigh,Tommy Law, and each of them, our true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, each with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments to this report, and to file the same, with exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite or necessary to be done in and about the premises, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby, ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated:

 

Signature

Title

Date

/s/ JUSTIN HALL

President and Chief Executive Officer, General Counsel

and Director

March 26, 202031, 2023

Justin Hall

(principal executive officer)

/s/ JASON RALEIGHTOMMY LAW

Interim Chief Financial Officer

March 26, 202031, 2023

Jason RaleighTommy Law

(principal financial officer)

/s/ PAUL E. FREIMAN

Chairman of the Board

March 26, 202031, 2023

PaulE.Freiman

/s/ JULIE GARLIKOV

Director

March 31, 2023

Julie Garlikov

/s/ AUDREY KUNIN

Director

March 31, 2023

Audrey Kunin

/s/ XINZHOU LI

Director

March 26, 202031, 2023

Xinzhou Li (Paul LI)Li)

/s/ XIAOYAN LIU

Director

March 26, 2020

Xiaoyan Liu (Henry LIU)

/s/ GAIL MADERIS

Director

March 26, 2020

Gail Maderis, M.B.A.

/s/ SWAN SIT

Director

March 26, 202031, 2023

Swan Sit

/s/ XIAOPEI WANG

Director

March 26, 2020

Xiaopei (Ray) Wang

/s/ MIJIA WU

Director

March 26, 202031, 2023

Mijia Wu, M.B.A. (Bob WU)Wu)

/s/ YENYOU ZHENG

Director

March 26, 202031, 2023

Yenyou (Jeff) Zheng

 

77

79