--12-31 FY 2020
 

Table of Contents



UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549


FORM 10-K


10-K/A
(Amendment No. 1)

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020

TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission file number: 1-6311


Tidewater Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)


Delaware

logo01.jpglogo01.jpg

72-0487776

(State of incorporation)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

6002 Rogerdale Road, Suite 600

Houston, Texas

77072

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s

Registrants telephone number, including area code: (713) (713) 470-5300

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading

Symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, $0.001 par value per share

TDW

New York Stock Exchange

Preferred stock purchase rightsN/ANew York Stock Exchange

Series A Warrants to purchase shares of common stock

TDW.WS.A

New York Stock Exchange

Series B Warrants to purchase shares of common stock

TDW.WS.B

New York Stock Exchange

Warrants to purchase shares of common stock

TDW.WS

NYSE American

Preferred stock purchase rights
N/A
New York Stock Exchange

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

 

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

 

Smaller reporting company

Emerging growth company

   


If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over financial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting firm that prepared or issued its audit report. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ☐ No ☒

As of June 30, 2020, the aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $224.0 million based on the closing sales price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange of $5.59.

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has filed all documents and reports required to be filed by Section 12, 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 subsequent to the distribution of securities under a plan confirmed by a court. Yes ☒ No ☐

As of February 28,April 12, 2021, 40,715,61140,731,777 shares of the registrant’s common stock, $0.001 par value per share, were outstanding. Registrant has no other class of common stock outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement to be filed in connection with its 2021 annual meeting of stockholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.



 

None.
2

 

TIDEWATER INC.

FORM 10-K

10-K/A

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS

4

2
   

5

3
   

ITEM 1.

PART III
 

BUSINESS

5

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

12

ITEM 1B.

UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

29

ITEM 2.

PROPERTIES

29

ITEM 3.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

29

ITEM 4.

MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

29

4
   

PART II

30

ITEM 5.

MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

30

ITEM 7.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

32

ITEM 7A.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

46

ITEM 8.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

49

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS49
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULE49
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM50

ITEM 9.

CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

92

ITEM 9A.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

92

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

93

.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

94

PART III

95

ITEM 10.

DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

95

4

ITEM 11.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

95

14

ITEM 12.

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

95

39

ITEM 13.

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

95

43

ITEM 14.

PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

95

44
   

 

96

45
   

ITEM 15.

EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

EXHIBITS 

96

ITEM 16.

FORM 10-K SUMMARY  

100

45

31

EXPLANATORY NOTE
 

On March 4, 2021, Tidewater Inc. filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020 (the “Original Form 10-K”) with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). Tidewater is filing this Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (the “Form 10-K/A”) because it may not file its definitive proxy statement within 120 days after the end of such fiscal year. Therefore, this Form 10-K/A is being filed to provide the information required in Part III of Form 10-K.
In addition, as required by Rule 12b-15 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), a certification by Tidewater’s principal executive and financial officer is filed as an exhibit to this Form 10-K/A under Item 15 of Part IV. Because no financial statements have been included in this Form 10-K/A and this Form 10-K/A does not contain or amend any disclosure with respect to Items 307 and 308 of Regulation S-K, paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 of the certifications have been omitted. We are not including the certifications under Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 as no financial statements are being filed with this Form 10-K/A.
Except as described above, this Form 10-K/A does not reflect events occurring after the date of the Original Form 10-K and does not modify or update disclosures contained in the Original Form 10-K including, without limitation, the financial statements. Information not affected by this Form 10-K/A remains unchanged and reflects the disclosures made at the time the Original Form 10-K was filed. Accordingly, this Form 10-K/A should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-K and our other filings with the SEC.
In this Form 10-K/A, unless the context indicates otherwise, the designations “Tidewater,” the “company,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to Tidewater Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
This document includes several website references. The information on these websites is not part of this Form 10-K/A.
2

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENT

In accordance with the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A, the Original Form 10-K, and the information incorporated herein by reference contain certain forward-looking statements which reflect our current view with respect to future events and future financial performance. Forward-looking statements are all statements other than statements of historical fact. All such forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the control of the company, and our future results of operations could differ materially from our historical results or current expectations reflected by such forward-looking statements. Some of these risks and uncertainties are discussed in this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A and the Original Form 10-K including(including in Item 1A. “Risk Factors”) and include, without limitation,limitation: the risks related to fluctuations in worldwide energy demand and oil and natural gas prices, and continuing depressed levels of oil and natural gas prices without a clear indication of if, or when, prices will recover to a level to support renewed offshore exploration activities; fleet additions by competitors and industry overcapacity; our limited capital resources available to replenish our asset base as needed, including through acquisitions or vessel construction, and to fund our capital expenditure needs; uncertainty of global financial market conditions and potential constraints in accessing capital or credit if and when needed with favorable terms, if at all; changes in decisions and capital spending by customers in the energy industry and the industry expectations for offshore exploration, field development and production; consolidation of our customer base; loss of a major customer; changing customer demands for vessel specifications, which may make some of our older vessels technologically obsolete for certain customer projects or in certain markets; rapid technological changes; delays and other problems associated with vessel maintenance; the continued availability of qualified personnel and our ability to attract and retain them; the operating risks normally incident to our lines of business, including the potential impact of liquidated counterparties; our ability to comply with covenants in our indentures and other debt instruments; acts of terrorism and piracy; the impact of regional or global public health crises or pandemics; the impact of potential information technology, cybersecurity or data security breaches; integration of acquired businesses and entry into new lines of business; disagreements with our joint venture partners; natural disasters or significant weather conditions; unsettled political conditions, war, civil unrest and governmental actions, such as expropriation or enforcement of customs or other laws that are not well developed or consistently enforced; the risks associated with our international operations, including local content, local currency or similar requirements especially in higher political risk countries where we operate; interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations; labor changes proposed by international conventions; increased regulatory burdens and oversight; changes in laws governing the taxation of foreign source income; retention of skilled workers; enforcement of laws related to the environment, labor and foreign corrupt practices; the potential liability for remedial actions or assessments under existing or future environmental regulations or litigation; the effects of asserted and unasserted claims and the extent of available insurance coverage; and the resolution of pending legal proceedings.

Forward-looking statements, which can generally be identified by the use of such terminology as “may,” “can,” “potential,” “expect,” “project,” “target,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “forecast,” “believe,” “think,” “could,” “continue,” “intend,” “seek,” “plan,” and similar expressions contained in this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A and the Original Form 10-K, are not guarantees or assurances of future performance or events. Any forward-looking statements are based on our assessment of current industry, financial and economic information, which by its nature is dynamic and subject to rapid and possibly abrupt changes, which we may or may not be able to control. Further, we may make changes to our business plans that could or will affect our results. While management believes that these forward-looking statements are reasonable when made, there can be no assurance that future developments that affect us will be those that we anticipate and have identified. The forward-looking statements should be considered in the context of the risk factors listed above and discussed in greater detail elsewhere in this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A and the Original Form 10-K. Investors and prospective investors are cautioned not to rely unduly on such forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Management disclaims any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect new information, future events or developments.

In certain places in this Annual Report onForm 10-K/A or the Original Form 10-K, we may refer to reports published by third parties that purport to describe trends or developments in energy production and drilling and exploration activity and we specifically disclaim any responsibility for the accuracy and completeness of such information and have undertaken no steps to update or independently verify such information.

3

PART III
ITEM 10.
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE INFORMATION REGARDING DIRECTORS
Under our current articles and bylaws, our directors serve one-year terms beginning with his or her election or appointment and ending when a successor, if any, is elected or appointed. We currently have seven directors.
A biography of each director is set forth below. Each director's biography contains information regarding that person’s service as a director, business experience, other public company directorships held currently or at any time during the last five years, and the director's experiences, qualifications, attributes, or skills. The information in each biography is presented as of April 30, 2021.
Name, Age and Position
Business and Leadership Experience, Skills, and Qualifications
Tidewater Director since
Darron M. Anderson, 52
Business and Leadership Experience:  Mr. Anderson has served as President and Chief Executive Officer, and as a member of the board of directors, of Ranger Energy Services, LLC (NYSE: “RNGR”) since March 2017. Mr. Anderson was previously an executive of Express Energy Services from 2004 through 2015, serving as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2008 to 2015. Subsequent to his time as President and Chief Executive Officer of Express Energy Services, Mr. Anderson evaluated potential acquisition opportunities from 2015 to 2016, and consulted for Littlejohn & Co., LLC from 2016 to 2017, and for CSL Capital Management, L.P. during 2017. Mr. Anderson began his career in the oil and natural gas industry as a drilling engineer for Chevron Corporation in 1991, holding positions of increasing responsibility across U.S. Land, Offshore and Canada. Mr. Anderson resigned from Chevron in 1998 to pursue an entrepreneurial career in oil field services where he has spent the last 23 years building successful service organizations focused on land and offshore drilling, completion and production operations. Mr. Anderson holds a B.S. in Petroleum Engineering from the University of Texas at Austin.
Skills and Qualifications:  Mr. Anderson brings to our board extensive leadership experience in the energy industry, particularly in offshore and on land drilling, as well as an entrepreneurial spirit and mindset.
2020
Dick Fagerstal, 60
Business and Leadership Experience: Mr. Fagerstal currently serves as Executive Chairman of the Global Marine Group, a subsea cable installation and maintenance business based in Chelmsford, England in the United Kingdom, since February 2020. From 2014 to 2020, Mr. Fagerstal served as Chairman & Chief Executive Officer of Global Marine Holdings LLC, the prior owner of the same business. He served as an independent director of Frontier Oil Corporation, Manila, Philippines, from 2014 to 2017. Mr. Fagerstal previously held the positions of Senior Vice President, Finance & Corporate Development from 2003 to 2014 and Vice President, Finance & Treasurer from 1997 to 2003 at SEACOR Holdings Inc. (NYSE: “CKH”). Mr. Fagerstal held the positions of Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and director of Era Group Inc. (NYSE: “ERA”) from 2011 to 2012 and was the Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and director of Chiles Offshore Inc. (AMEX: “COD”) from 1997 to 2002. Prior to that time, he served as a senior banker at DNB ASA in New York from 1986 to 1997. Prior to his business career, Mr. Fagerstal served as an officer in the Special Air Service unit of the Swedish Special Forces from 1979 to 1983. Mr. Fagerstal earned a B.S. in Economics from the University of Gothenburg and an M.B.A. in Finance, as a Fulbright Scholar, from New York University.
Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Fagerstal brings a strong business, finance and accounting background to our board. Given the nature and scope of our operations, his extensive international business experience and considerable knowledge of the energy and maritime industries contributes to our board’s collective ability to monitor the risks and challenges facing our company.
2017
4

Name, Age and PositionBusiness and Leadership Experience, Skills, and QualificationsTidewater Director since
Quintin V. Kneen, 55
President and CEO
Business and Leadership Experience: Mr. Kneen was appointed President, CEO and Director of Tidewater in September 2019. Prior to this appointment, he served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Tidewater since November 2018 following its acquisition of GulfMark where he served as President and Chief Executive Officer since June 2013. Mr. Kneen joined GulfMark in June 2008 as the Vice President – Finance and was named Senior Vice President – Finance and Administration in December 2008. He was subsequently appointed as the Company’s Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer in June 2009 where he worked until his appointment as Chief Executive Officer. In May 2017, GulfMark filed a voluntary petition for relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware. On November 14, 2017, GulfMark emerged from bankruptcy (the “GulfMark Reorganization”). Before his tenure at GulfMark, Mr. Kneen was Vice President–Finance & Investor Relations for Grant Prideco, Inc., serving in executive finance positions at Grant Prideco since June 2003. Prior to joining Grant Prideco, Mr. Kneen held executive finance positions at Azurix Corp. and was an Audit Manager with the Houston office of Price Waterhouse LLP. He holds an M.B.A. from Rice University and a B.B.A. in Accounting from Texas A&M University, and is a Certified Public Accountant and a Chartered Financial Analyst.
Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Kneen brings to our board significant executive management experience and industry knowledge from his roles as the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of two different public companies in our industry. As a Certified Public Accountant and Chartered Financial Analyst, he has a sophisticated understanding of financial and accounting matters. In addition, in his position as our President and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Kneen serves as a valuable liaison between our board and the management team.
2019
Louis A. Raspino, 68
Business and Leadership Experience: Mr. Raspino’s career has spanned almost 40 years in the energy industry, most recently as Chairman of Clarion Offshore Partners, a partnership with Blackstone that served as its platform for pursuing worldwide investments in the offshore oil and gas services sector, from October 2015 until October 2017. Mr. Raspino served as President, Chief Executive Officer and a director of Pride International, Inc. from June 2005 until the company merged with Ensco plc in May 2011, and as its Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer from December 2003 until June 2005. From July 2001 until December 2003, he served as Senior Vice President, Finance and Chief Financial Officer of Grant Prideco, Inc., and from February 1999 until March 2001, he served as Vice President of Finance at Halliburton. Prior to joining Haliburton, Mr. Raspino served as Senior Vice President at Burlington Resources, Inc. from October 1997 until July 1998. From 1978 until its merger with Burlington Resources, Inc. in 1997, he held a variety of positions at Louisiana Land and Exploration Company, most recently as Senior Vice President, Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer. Mr. Raspino previously served as a director of Chesapeake Energy Corporation and chairman of its audit committee from March 2013 until March 2016, and as a director of Dresser-Rand Group, Inc., where he served as Chairman of the compensation committee and member of the audit committee, from December 2005 until it was acquired by Siemens AG in June 2015. He has served as a director of Forum Energy Technologies (NYSE: “FET”), a global oilfield products company, since January 2012 and currently serves as the chairman of its compensation committee. Mr. Raspino also currently serves on the board of American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), where he is a member of the audit and compensation committees. Mr. Raspino served as Chairman of the GulfMark board from November 2017 until consummation of the business combination.
Skills and Qualifications: Having served in executive leadership roles at several energy companies, including both the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer positions, Mr. Raspino brings in-depth operational and financial expertise to our board. In addition, his current service on a variety of oil and gas industry boards provides our board with key and timely insights into industry conditions and trends.
2018
Larry T. Rigdon, 73
Chairman of the Board
Business and Leadership Experience: Mr. Rigdon, who was initially appointed to serve as an independent director in connection with our restructuring, served as Tidewater’s interim President and Chief Executive Officer between October 2017 and March 2018. He has over 45 years of experience in the offshore oil and gas industry. Mr. Rigdon worked as a consultant for FTI Consulting from 2015 to 2016 and for Duff and Phelps, LLC from 2010 to 2011. He served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Rigdon Marine from 2002 to 2008. Previously at Tidewater, Mr. Rigdon served as an Executive Vice President from 2000 to 2002, a Senior Vice President from 1997 to 2000, and a Vice President from 1992 to 1997. Before working at Tidewater, he served as Vice President at Zapata Gulf Marine from 1985 to 1992, and in various capacities, including Vice President of Domestic Divisions from 1983 to 1985, at Gulf Fleet Marine from 1977 to 1985. Mr. Rigdon currently serves as a director of Professional Rental Tools, LLC. He formerly served as a director of Jackson Offshore Holdings, Terresolve Technologies, GulfMark Offshore and Rigdon Marine. He has a B.S. in Accounting and was a Certified Public Accountant earlier in his career, which license is currently inactive.
Skills and Qualifications:Mr. Rigdon has considerable leadership experience in the maritime transportation industry and brings to our board a thorough understanding of the strategic and operational challenges facing our company, specifically, and our industry overall. His experience founding new businesses provides an entrepreneurial vision and his successful completion of mergers and acquisitions contributes to the board’s ability to evaluate such opportunities.
2017
5

Name, Age and PositionBusiness and Leadership Experience, Skills, and QualificationsTidewater Director since
Kenneth H. Traub, 60
Business and Leadership Experience: Mr. Traub has served as the Managing Partner of Delta Value Group, LLC, an investment firm, since 2019, and the Managing Partner of Delta Value Advisors, LLC, a consulting firm, since 2020. Since 2012, Mr. Traub has served on the board of directors of DSP Group, Inc. (NASDAQ: “DSPG”), a leading supplier of wireless chipset solutions for converged communications, and as Chairman since 2017. He also currently serves on the board of directors of Athersys, Inc. (NASDAQ: “ATHX”), a biotechnology company, since February 2021, and previously served on the board of Athersys from 2012 to 2016 and in 2020. Mr. Traub served as a Managing Partner of Raging Capital Management, LLC, a diversified investment firm, from December 2015 to January 2019. He previously served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Ethos Management, LLC from 2009 through 2015. From 1999 until its acquisition by JDS Uniphase Corp. (“JDSU”) in 2008, Mr. Traub served as President and Chief Executive Officer of American Bank Note Holographics, Inc. (“ABNH”), a leading global supplier of optical security devices for the protection of documents and products against counterfeiting. Following the sale of ABNH, he served as Vice President of JDSU, a global leader in optical technologies and telecommunications. Mr. Traub has previously served on the boards of numerous public companies including (i) MIPS Technologies, Inc., a provider of industry standard processor architectures and cores, from 2011 until the company was sold in 2013; (ii) Xyratex Limited, a leading supplier of data storage technologies, from 2013 until the company was sold in 2014; (iii) Vitesse Semiconductor Corporation, a supplier of integrated circuit solutions for next-generation carrier and enterprise networks, from 2013 until the company was sold in 2015; (iv) A. M. Castle & Co., a specialty metals distribution company from 2014 to 2016; (v) IDW Media Holdings, Inc., a diversified media company, from 2016 to 2018; (vi) as Chairman of MRV Communications, Inc., a supplier of communication networking equipment, from 2011 until the company was sold in 2017; (vii) Intermolecular, Inc., an innovator in materials sciences, from 2016, and as Chairman of the board from 2018 through the sale of the company in 2019; and (viii) Immersion Corporation (NASDAQ: “IMMR”), a leading provider of haptics technology, from 2018 to 2019. Mr. Traub served as a member of the GulfMark board from November 2017 until consummation of the business combination. Mr. Traub earned a B.A. degree from Emory University and an M.B.A. degree from Harvard Business School.
Skills and Qualifications: Mr. Traub’s qualifications to serve on our board include his extensive and diverse business management experience and expertise, particularly in challenging turn-around environments. In addition, he contributes to the board’s effectiveness in strategic, financial, operational and governance matters.
2018
Lois K. Zabrocky, 51
Business and Leadership Experience:  Ms. Zabrocky has served as President, Chief Executive Officer, and a Director of International Seaways, Inc. (NYSE: INSW) since its spin-off from Overseas Shipholding Group, Inc. (“OSG”) in November 2016 and was President of INSW from August 2014. Prior to the spin-off, Ms. Zabrocky served in various roles at OSG over a career of more than 25 years, most recently as Senior Vice President and Head of the International Flag Strategic Business Unit of OSG, with responsibility for the strategic plan and profit and loss performance of OSG’s international tanker fleet comprised of 50 vessels and approximately 300 shoreside staff. In November 2012, OSG filed a voluntary petition for relief under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, emerging from bankruptcy on August 5, 2014. Ms. Zabrocky served as Senior Vice President of OSG from June 2008 through August 2014, when she was appointed as Co-President of OSG and Head of the International Flag Strategic Business Unit of OSG. Ms. Zabrocky served as Chief Commercial Officer, International Flag Strategic Business Unit, of OSG from May 2011 until her appointment as Head of International Flag Strategic Business Unit and as the Head of International Product Carrier and Gas Strategic Business Unit for at least four years prior to May 2011. Ms. Zabrocky served as a director of INSW from November 2011 through November 2016 while it was a wholly-owned subsidiary of OSG. Ms. Zabrocky began her maritime career sailing as third mate aboard a U.S. flag chemical tanker. She received her B.S. degree from the United States Merchant Marine Academy, holds a Third Mate’s license and has completed both of Harvard Business School’s Strategic Negotiations and Finance for Senior Executives programs.
Skills and Qualifiations:  Ms. Zabrocky brings to our board significant executive and operational experience, including managing a company with significant international operations. Her expertise in many aspects of the maritime transportation industry adds significant value to our board’s knowledge base.
2020
6

PART IINFORMATION REGARDING EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

This section highlights information that

Information regarding our current executive officers (other than Mr. Kneen, who also serves as a director and is discussed in more detailincluded in the remaindersection above), including all offices held by the officer as of December 31, 2020, is as follows:
Name
Age
Position
David E. Darling66Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer since March 2021. Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer from March 2018 to March 2021. Senior Vice President and Chief Human Resources Officer of GulfMark from 2007 to March 2018, including during the GulfMark Reorganization.
Daniel A. Hudson49Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary since March 2021. Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary from October 2019 to March 2021. Assistant General Counsel from May 2017 to September 2019. Managing Counsel from May 2015 to May 2017. Regional Counsel from May 2012 to May 2017. Staff Attorney from July 2007 to May 2012.
Samuel R. Rubio61Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer since March 2021. Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer, and Controller from December 2018 to March 2021. Prior to the business combination, Senior Vice President – Chief Financial Officer of GulfMark from April 2018 to November 2018. Senior Vice President – Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of GulfMark from January 2012 to April 2018, including during the GulfMark Reorganization. Vice President – Controller and Chief Accounting Officer of GulfMark from December 2008 and December 2011.
7

There are no family relationships between any of the document.

directors or executive officers of the company or any arrangements or understandings between any of the executive officers and any other person pursuant to which any of the executive officers were selected as an officer. The company’s executive officers are appointed by, and serve at the pleasure of, the board of directors.

ITEM 1. BUSINESSCORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Tidewater Inc.,

Our board has adopted corporate governance practices designed to aid the board and management in the fulfillment of their respective duties and responsibilities to our stockholders.
Corporate Governance Policy. Our board has adopted a Delaware corporation thatCorporate Governance Policy, which, together with our certificate of incorporation, bylaws, and board committee charters, form the framework for the governance of our company. The nominating and corporate governance committee is a listed company oncharged with reviewing the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) underCorporate Governance Policy at least annually to assess the symbol “TDW”, provides offshore marine supportcontinued appropriateness of those guidelines in light of any new regulatory requirements and transportation servicesevolving corporate governance practices. After this review, the committee recommends any proposed changes to the global offshore energy industry throughCorporate Governance Policy to the operationfull board for approval.
Code of Business Conduct and Ethics. Our board has also adopted a diversified fleetCode of marine service vessels.Business Conduct and Ethics. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics sets forth principles of ethical and legal conduct to be followed by our directors, officers, and employees. The Code of Business Conduct and Ethics requires any employee who reasonably believes or suspects that any director, officer, or employee has violated the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, company policy, or applicable law to report such activities to his or her supervisor or to our Chief Compliance Officer (Daniel A. Hudson, our Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary), either directly or anonymously. We were incorporateddo not tolerate retaliation of any kind against any person who, in 1956good faith, reports any known or suspected improper activities pursuant to the Code of Business Conduct and conductEthics or assists with any ensuing investigation.
Our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics also references disclosure controls and procedures required to be followed by all officers and employees involved with the preparation of the company’s SEC filings. These disclosure controls and procedures are designed to enhance the accuracy and completeness of the company’s SEC filings and, among other things, to ensure continued compliance with the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act.
Environmental, Social and Governance Highlights. Since Tidewater was founded 65 years ago, we have been guided by our values, commitment to safety, and respect for stakeholders, communities and the environment. We believe operating effectively means operating safely and responsibly and we have a long history of investing in new equipment and technologies that improve our operations and support environmental stewardship initiatives. We also consistently strive to support our employees through wholly-owned United States (U.S.extensive training and development programs and continuously emphasize our high safety standards.
Our board engages in regular discussions relating to environmental, social and governance (“ESG”) initiatives and international subsidiaries, as well as through joint ventures in which Tidewater has either majority or non-controlling interests (generally where requiredis committed to satisfy local ownership or local content requirements). Unless otherwise required by the context, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “the company” as used herein refer to Tidewater Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors.

On July 31, 2017, Tidewater successfully emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings and adopted fresh-start accounting. 

About Tidewater

Our vessels and associated vessel services provide support primarily for all phases of offshore oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production as well as windfarm developmentpromotion of ESG practices across the organization. Our board considers our sustainability agenda at least annually in connection with our strategic plan. The Nominating and maintenance. These services include towingCorporate Governance Committee is tasked with the responsibility of overseeing the effectiveness of our ESG policies, goals and anchor handling for, mobile offshore drilling units; transporting suppliesprograms, including review of our annual Sustainability Report. Other board committees are also involved with the assessment and personnel necessarymanagement of our environmental and social priorities through their oversight responsibilities, including risk and talent management.

Our commitment to sustain drilling, workoverESG principles is reflected in our core values and production activities; offshore construction and seismic and subsea support; geotechnical survey support for windfarm construction, and a variety of specialized services such as pipe and cable laying. in various ongoing initiatives, including the following: 
maintaining the highest standards of business conduct and ethics by conducting our affairs in an honest and ethical manner with unyielding personal and corporate integrity at the foundation of our business;
adhering to our core values and striving to continually improve our ESG systems and processes to enhance our performance;
8

demonstrating integrity and respect for others by setting goals and objectives that enhance our commitment to a safe workplace;
protecting the environment by focusing on operational efficiencies that promote the reduction of emissions through fuel and environmental monitoring;
ensuring that the safety of our employees, as reported in industry-leading metrics, is our highest priority;
actively embracing, valuing and encouraging the diversity of our employees and ensuring this culture remains an integral part of our employment and retention policies;
communicating our expectation that our company, including our suppliers, contractors, and employees, achieves and promotes strong ESG performance;
investing in community betterment in the areas in which we operate;
focusing on developing and implementing sustainable practices that promote health, fair dealing and compliance throughout our business;
responsibly recycling vessels in a sustainable and socially-responsible manner, safeguarding the environment and human health and safety in accordance with applicable laws and regulations, including the 2009 “Hong Kong Convention for the Safe and Environmentally Sound Recycling of Ships,” the “Basel Convention on the Control of the Transboundary Movements of Hazardous Wastes and their Disposal” and, where applicable, EU and U.S. EPA Ship Recycling Regulation;
setting GHG reduction targets in alignment with the goals of the “United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change”, better known as the “Paris Climate Agreement” or “COP21”, to keep global warming under two degrees Celsius and the IMO’s own climate goals, to reduce absolute emissions 50% by 2050 and by 70% on an intensity basis;
regularly reporting our ESG results, while continuing to evaluate ways to improve; and
developing frameworks and metrics to present our ESG results in an effective and transparent manner.
In addition, we have onerecognition of the broadest geographic operating footprintsimportance of ESG principles to our business, the initiatives set forth above are being undertaken with the unanimous support of our board.
In 2020, significant progress was made in the offshore vessel industry.

Our principal customers are large, international integrated and independent oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production companies (IOCs); select mid-sized and smaller independent exploration and production (E&P) companies; foreign government-owned or government-controlled organizations and other related companies that explore for, develop and produce oil and natural gas (NOCs); drilling contractors; and other companies that provide various services to the offshore energy industry,many of these areas, including but not limited to offshore construction companies, windfarm development companies, diving companiesthe following:

the company appointed a vice president of ESG to lead the development of our sustainability strategy, and in cooperation with key functional leaders, to implement sustainability policies and processes across our operations worldwide;
we achieved the company’s best safety performance on record, with zero lost time incidents and a TRIR of 0.34 per million man-hours;
the company recorded no material incidents or related to significant or harmful accidental spills in 2020;
we continued to execute our plan to expand the connectivity of our fleet with the implementation of state-of-the-art high bandwidth satellite communications, allowing us to more efficiently monitor and leverage big data to drive operational improvements that will continue to result in cost efficiencies and emissions reductions;
9

we established a baseline measurement of our GHG emissions and expanded our multi-faceted approach to emissions reduction including upgrading additional vessels with hybrid battery and shore power systems, while we continue to consider a wide range of complementary or alternative solutions that would deliver value over the short, medium and longer term through increased operational and cost efficiencies;
our cybersecurity initiatives continued to expand to ensure compliance with IMO Resolution MSC.428(98) - Maritime Cyber Risk Management in Safety Management Systems;
as a long-standing member of the organization, the company formally pledged to support the National Ocean Industries Association (NOIA)’s ESG program, which aligns with our own principles, including advancing best practices to reduce environmental impact and promote ecosystem health, developing a systematic approach to address climate change, promoting safe and healthy working conditions for our employees and supporting and encouraging diversity and inclusion in the industry’s employment practices;
Tidewater became a signatory to the UN Global Compact, the world’s largest corporate sustainability initiative, as part of our commitment to align our operations and strategies in the areas of human rights, labor, environment, and anti-corruption, and to take action in support of the UN goals and issues embodied in the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs);
in line with our commitment to protecting the environment, Tidewater has partnered with Sea Life Rescue, an organization with the mission to replenish endangered fish species by strategically deploying its innovative mobile marine hatcheries utilizing OSVs around the globe to restore critical biodiversity;
The company also developed and well stimulation companies.

published its inaugural sustainability report, in alignment with the SASB Marine Transportation Standard (2018), TCFD climate-related disclosure recommendations and using GRI’s materiality principle to identify topics which have significant environmental, social, or economic impact or that are considered important to our stakeholders. A detailed review of the company’s progress in 2020, including a materiality analysis, current metrics, and future sustainability plans is included in the report. The report is available www.tdw.com/sustainability/sustainability2020.

Complaint Procedures for Accounting, Auditing, and Financial Related Matters. The audit committee has established procedures for receiving, reviewing, and responding to complaints from any source regarding accounting, internal accounting controls, and auditing matters. The audit committee has also established procedures for the confidential and anonymous submission by employees of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters. Interested parties may communicate such complaints to the audit committee chair by following the procedures described under the heading “Communications with Our active offshore support vessel fleet consists primarilyBoard of Directors” below. Employees may report such complaints by following the procedures outlined in the Code of Business Conduct and Ethics and through other procedures communicated and available to them. As noted above, we do not tolerate retaliation of any kind against any person who, in good faith, submits a complaint or concern under these procedures.
MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
During the 2020 fiscal year, our board held 11 meetings including telephonic meetings. Each director attended at least 75% of the meetings of the board and of the committees on which he or she served during fiscal 2020.
Executive Sessions. Our non-management directors meet in regularly-scheduled executive sessions presided over by our chairman. At the conclusion of each board meeting, the non-management directors have an opportunity to meet in executive session. The non-management and independent directors may schedule additional executive sessions throughout the year. During fiscal 2020, the non-management members of our board (all of our directors except the individual then serving as chief executive officer) met six times in executive session.
Committee Structure. Our board currently has three standing committees: audit, compensation, and nominating and corporate governance. Actions taken by our committees are reported to the full board. Each of these three committees is comprised entirely of independent directors and is governed by a written charter that is reviewed annually and approved by the full board. A copy of each committee charter is available online and may be obtained as described below under “Availability of Corporate Governance Materials.”
10

The current members of each board committee are identified in the following table, which also indicates the number of meetings each committee held during fiscal 2020:
 
Board Committee
 
Audit
Compensation
Nominating and
Corporate Governance
Darron M. AndersonX X
Dick FagerstalChair X
Quintin V. Kneen   
Louis A. RaspinoXChair 
Larry T. Rigdon   
Kenneth H. Traub XChair
Lois K. ZabrockyXX 
Number of Meetings in Fiscal 2020
633
Audit Committee. Our board’s audit committee is a separately designated, standing committee established in accordance with Section 3(a)(58)(A) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Its current members are listed in the above chart. The board has determined that all three committee members are financially literate and that each of the three members qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined by SEC rules.
The main function of our audit committee is to oversee our accounting and financial reporting processes, internal systems of control, independent auditor relationship, and the audits of our financial statements. The audit committee’s key responsibilities are:
appointing and retaining our independent auditor;
evaluating the qualifications, independence, and performance of our independent auditor;
reviewing and approving all services (audit and permitted non-audit) to be performed by our independent auditor;
reviewing with management and the independent auditor our audited financials;
reviewing the scope, adequacy, and effectiveness of our internal controls;
reviewing with management our earnings reports, quarterly financial reports and certain disclosures;
reviewing, approving, and overseeing related party transactions; and
monitoring the company’s efforts to mitigate the risk of financial loss due to failure of third parties.
The audit committee is also responsible for any audit reports the SEC requires us to include in our proxy statements. 
Each member of the audit committee satisfies all of the additional independence requirements for audit committee members set forth in the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE and Exchange Act Rule 10A-3.
Compensation Committee. The role of the compensation committee is to assist our board of directors in discharging its responsibilities relating to:
overseeing our executive compensation program;
11

reviewing and approving corporate goals and objectives relevant to the compensation of our executive officers and determining and approving the compensation of our executive officers, including cash and equity-based incentives;
consideration of all substantive elements of our employee compensation package, including identifying, evaluating, and mitigating any risks arising from our compensation policies and practices;
ensuring compliance with laws and regulations governing executive compensation;
evaluating appropriate compensation levels and designing elements of director compensation; and
engaging in such other matters as may from time to time be specifically delegated to the committee by the board of directors.
Each member of the compensation committee satisfies all of the additional independence requirements for compensation committee members set forth in the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE and Exchange Act Rule 16b-3.
The compensation committee reports to the board of directors on all compensation matters regarding our executive officers and management and may form and delegate authority to subcommittees when appropriate. The compensation committee is also responsible for reviewing and discussing with management the “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” section of our Form 10-K or proxy statement and, based on such review and discussion, recommending to the board that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in our Form 10-K or proxy statement and issuing a Compensation Committee Report to that effect.
The “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” or “CD&A” section of this Form 10-K/A provides a discussion of the process the committee uses in determining executive compensation. Included in the subsection entitled “Process of Setting Compensation” is a description of the scope of the compensation committee’s authority, the role played by our chief executive officer in recommending compensation for the other named executives, and the committee’s engagement of compensation consultants.
Risk Review of Employee Compensation. Consistent with SEC disclosure requirements, the compensation committee performs an annual risk assessment of our company’s compensation programs. Management has identified the elements of our compensation program that could incentivize management to take risks and has reported to the compensation committee its assessment of those risks and mitigating factors particular to each risk. The compensation committee has concluded that our compensation policies and practices do not create risks that are reasonably likely to have a material adverse effect on our company. Some of the findings the committee considered in reaching this conclusion include:
our cash/equity mix strikes an appropriate balance between short-term and long-term risk and reward decisions;
the company performance portion of our annual incentive plan is based on company-wide financial and operating performance metrics as well as safety criteria, which are less likely to be affected by individual or group risk-taking;
our annual and long-term incentive plans have conservative payout caps;
our compensation levels and performance criteria are subject to multiple levels of review and approval;
we have an executive compensation recovery policy (“clawback”) and stock ownership guidelines for our executives; and
our Policy Statement on Insider Trading prohibits hedging and pledging of company securities by all company insiders, including our executives.
12

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. The key responsibilities of the nominating and corporate governance committee are to:
assist our board by identifying individuals qualified to serve as directors of the company and recommending nominees to the board;
monitor the composition of our board and its committees;
recommend to our board a set of corporate governance guidelines for the company;
oversee legal and regulatory compliance;
oversee our environmental, social, and governance (“ESG”) initiatives; and
lead our board in its annual review of the board’s performance.
AVAILABILITY OF CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATERIALS
Stockholders and other interested parties may access our certificate of incorporation, our bylaws, our Corporate Governance Policy, our Code of Business Conduct and Ethics, and all committee charters under “Corporate Governance” in the “About Tidewater” section of our website at www.tdw.com. Stockholders may also request printed copies, which will be mailed to stockholders without charge, by writing to the company owned vessels. Asin care of December 31, 2020, we owned 149 active vesselsour Secretary, 6002 Rogerdale Road, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77072.
2021 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS
On February 26, 2021, our board determined that the company’s 2021 annual meeting of which 35 have been temporarily stackedstockholders (the “Annual Meeting”) will be held on June 8, 2021. The new deadline for stockholder proposals and director nominations for consideration at the Annual Meeting was the close of business on March 10, 2021. Stockholders submitting proposals should deliver the proposal in writing, in accordance with the specific procedural requirements set forth in the company’s bylaws, to the company’s Secretary at 6002 Rogerdale Road, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77072, Attention: Secretary.
COMMUNICATIONS WITH OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS
Stockholders and other interested parties may communicate directly with our board, the non-management directors, or withdrawn from service. In addition, we owned 23 vessels that have been designated for saleany committee or individual director by writing to any one of them in care of our Secretary at 6002 Rogerdale Road, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77072. Our company or the director contacted will forward the communication to the appropriate director. For more information regarding how to contact the members of our board, please visit our website at www.tdw.com/about-tidewater/corporate-governance/.
13

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS
This section of our Form 10-K discusses and have been classified as such onanalyzes our executive compensation philosophy and program in the Balance Sheet. Pleasecontext of the compensation paid during the last fiscal year to certain executive officers of the company. We refer to Notes (1)these executives as our “named executives” or “NEOs.” For fiscal 2020, our named executives were:
NEOCurrent Title
Quintin V. KneenPresident and Chief Executive Officer
David E. DarlingExecutive Vice President, Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Human Resources Officer
Daniel A. HudsonExecutive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
Samuel R. RubioExecutive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer
In this Compensation Discussion and (8) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information regarding our stacked vessels and vessels held for sale.

Our revenues, net earnings and cash flows from operations are largely dependent upon the activity levelAnalysis (“CD&A”) section, we first provide an Executive Summary of our offshore support vessel fleet. Ourcompany’s business activity is largely dependent on offshore exploration, field development and production activity byperformance during the fiscal year and how that performance affected executive compensation decisions and payouts. We next explain the Compensation Philosophy and Objectives that guide our customers. Our customers’ business activity,compensation committee’s executive compensation decisions. We then describe the committee’s Process of Setting Compensation. Next, we discuss in turn, is dependent on actual and expected crude oil and natural gas prices, which fluctuate depending on expected future levels of supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas, and on estimatesdetail each of the cost (and relative cost) of finding, developingCompensation Components, including, for each component, a design overview as well as the actual results yielded for each named executive in fiscal 2020.

Executive Summary
Fiscal 2020 and producing reserves.

Depending on vessel capabilities and availability, our vessels operate in the shallow, intermediate and deepwater offshore markets. Deepwater oil and gas development typically involves significant capital investment and multi-year development plans. Recent Company Performance Highlights.

Successful Realization of Business Combination Synergies. Since the completion of our business combination with GulfMark in November 2018, we have high-graded our fleet and achieved material cost savings.
$97 million proceeds from disposal of
non-core and lower specification vessels
Reduced cost structure by 33% since
merger
Outperformed G&A cost
reduction targets
Maintained Sector-Leading Balance Sheet Strength. We maintained our sector-leading financial profile and low net debt position by carefully managing our balance sheet and being conservative with respect to capital expenditures.
Reduced long-term debt by
over $250 million
Consent solicitation of senior notes reduced
risk of covenant noncompliance
Cash tender offer to purchase up to $50 million of outstanding senior notes
Capital Discipline Focus. Capital discipline remains a core focus for Tidewater and our ongoing fleet rationalization, working capital management and disciplined approach to capital expenditures all contribute significantly to our ability to generate positive cash flow.
Generated $52.7 million in
free cash flow (FCF)
Shifted geographic footprint to more profitable locations such as Trinidad and Suriname
Implemented digital
transformation to improve efficiency
14

Industry Leader in Safety Performance. Tidewater’s initiatives to streamline its operating platform did not reduce our high standard of operations.
TRIR of 0.34 lowest in
Company history
Zero loss time incidents
Significantly reduced insurance
and loss reserves
Shareholder Value Creation and Improvements on Corporate Governance Matters. Tidewater has taken decisive actions to put Tidewater on a firm course for success and shareholder value-creation, including enhanced focus on ESG-related matters across the Company.
Streamlined board and
executive team structure
Improved gender and
ethnic diversity of board
Upgraded talent and industry
expertise of executive team
Although these projects are generally less susceptible to short-term fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas, deepwater exploration and development projects are generally more costly than other onshore and offshore exploration and development. As a result, the sustained low levels of crude oil prices over the past few years have caused, and maywe continue to cause, many E&P companies to restrain their levelwork towards our goal of capital expenditures in regard to deepwater projects.  Offshore windfarm developments are forecasted to increase over the coming years, and these may provide additional opportunities for a certain cross-section ofsustainable positive free cash flow (FCF), we do expect our larger vessels.  These projects generally require fewer and more specialized vessels.

Revenues are derived primarily from vessel time charter or similar contracts that are generally from three months to several years in duration, and, to a lesser extent, from vessel time charter contracts on a “spot” basis, which is a short-term agreement ranging from one day to three months to provide offshore marine services to a customer for a specific short-term job. The base rate of hire for a term contract is generally a fixed rate, though some charter arrangements allow us to recover specific additional costs.

COVID-19 Pandemic

In early 2020, it became evident that a novel coronavirus originating in Asia (COVID-19) could become a pandemic with worldwide reach.  By mid-March, when the World Health Organization declared the outbreak to be a pandemic (the COVID-19 pandemic), much of the industrialized world had initiated severe measures to lessen its impact.  The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic created significant volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption throughout 2020.  With respect to our particular sector, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a much lower demand for oil as national, regional, and local governments impose travel restrictions, border closings, restrictions on public gatherings, stay at home orders, and limitations on business operations in order to contain its spread.  During this same time period, oil-producing countries struggled to reach consensus on worldwide production levels, resulting in both a market oversupply of oil and a precipitous fall in oil prices. Several vaccines were developed and approved during 2020, but distribution of the vaccines is not expected to create general immunity until the latter half of 2021 at the earliest.

Combined, these conditions adversely affected our operations and business beginning in late March 2020 and continuing through the remainder 2020 and, in spite of the approval and distribution of the vaccines and the gradual reopening of economies, we expect our operations and business during 2021 to continue to be negatively impacted. Theimpacted by the reduction in demand for hydrocarbons together withresulting from the response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In 2020, the reduction in demand for hydrocarbons compounded by a global over-supply of oil resulted in an unprecedented decline in the price of oil, haswhich resulted in our primary customers, the oil and gas companies, making material reductions to their planned spending on offshore projects, compounding the effect of the virus on offshore operations. Further,

As the full impact of these conditions,factors to our operating environment continues to play out, our team remains dedicated to monitoring, adapting to and mitigating the effects on our business. Ensuring the health and safety of our employees and maintaining our strong balance sheet and liquidity will remain our key priorities.
Fiscal 2020 Compensation Highlights. As described in greater detail under “Compensation Components,” the three main components of our executive compensation program are base salary, an annual cash incentive award, and long-term incentive awards. The table below provides a summary of key actions taken with respect to each of these three components in fiscal 2020:
Pay Component
Results for 2020
Considerations
Base Salary
CEO’s base salary was unchanged
Other NEO’s salaries were increased by 20%
To move salaries closer to market median and to recognize expanding individual responsibilities
Short-Term Incentive (STI) Program
For each NEO, STI award payouts were 80% of targetTo reflect and recognize free cash flow (“FCF”) achievement in excess of threshold, historically strong safety performance, and target performance on individual performance objectives
Long-Term Incentive (LTI) Award
In April, we granted annual LTI awards to our NEOs as follows:
img.jpg  CEO: 50% time-based RSUs and 50% stock options with a premium exercise price (125% of the closing price of the company’s common stock on the date of grant)
img.jpg  Other NEOs: 100% time-based RSUs
img.jpg  To further the direct shareholder alignment, with a significant performance-based component for our  CEO
img.jpg  To help manage dilution, a 60-day average stock price was used to determine number of shares granted to NEOs, resulting in greater than 50% reduction in actual grant value as compared to target grant value
15

In addition to the three components discussed above, in early 2020, due to employee retention concerns in a very uncertain economic environment, the company adopted a retention program for current officers and certain other key employees to preserve management through any payout of the 2020 STI program. As discussed in greater detail below under “Compensation Components – Retention Bonuses,” each of our named executives entered into an agreement with the company that provided for the payment of a cash retention award no later than April 30, 2020 (for each of Messrs. Kneen, Rubio and Darling, in the amount of $300,000; for Mr. Hudson, $210,000). As provided in the agreement, the retention awards are subject to a recapture provision that will be triggered if the participant’s employment terminates within a year of the agreement’s execution.
As our industry enters a downturn, the compensation committee is committed to ensuring that we have an appropriate program in place to retain, motivate and incentivize our leadership team to guide us through the cycle.
Compensation Philosophy and Objectives
As a company with a global reach in an operationally-demanding, volatile, highly cyclical, and capital-intensive business, we design our executive compensation program to achieve the following objectives:
Pay for performance:to promote a performance- and results-oriented environment with conservative salaries and enhanced emphasis on at-risk pay, aligning compensation with performance measures that are directly related to our company’s strategic goals, key financial and safety results, individual performance, and creation of long-term stockholder value without incurring undue risk;
Pay competitively and equitably:to provide externally competitive and internally equitable compensation opportunities to help attract, motivate, develop, and retain the executive talent that we require to compete and manage our business effectively; and
Shareholder alignment:to align the interests of executives and stockholders by delivering a significant portion of target compensation in equity or equity-based vehicles.
The specific principles followed and decisions made in establishing the compensation of our named executives for fiscal 2020 are discussed in more detail below.
Compensation Best Practices. Our compensation committee (referred to throughout this section as the “committee”) strives to align executive compensation with stockholder interests and incorporate strong governance standards into our compensation program, including through the following:
Emphasis on Performance-Based and At-Risk Compensation. By design, a meaningful portion of our named executives’ pay is delivered in the form of performance-driven and at-risk incentive compensation, which closely aligns a significant portion of executive pay with successful attainment of our business objectives and, ultimately, stockholder returns.
No Single-Trigger Change of Control Benefits. We do not currently have any arrangements with our named executives that provide for single-trigger cash or equity change of control benefits. We believe that our executive change of control agreements provide protections to our executives that align with current market practice (including modest severance multiples such as 3x for our CEO and 2x for our other named executives, caps on certain benefits, and a “best-net” provision in the event the total payments to the executive trigger an excise tax).
Limited Executive Perquisites. We offer our executives very few perquisites that are not generally available to all employees – reimbursement of certain club memberships and paid parking.
16

No Income or Excise Tax Gross-Ups. We do not have any contractual arrangements that would require us to pay tax gross-ups to any of our executives.
Clawback Policy that Applies to Cash and Equity Compensation. Given that a significant portion of each named executive’s compensation is incentive-based, the compensation committee has adopted a compensation recovery, or “clawback,” policy applicable to cash and equity incentive compensation, which permits the company to recoup such payments in certain situations if the financial statements covering the reporting period to which such compensation relates must be restated.
Robust Stock Ownership Guidelines Applicable to Directors and Officers. Each director and officer is required to acquire and hold significant positions in company stock by the later of August 1, 2022 or the fifth anniversary of his or her appointment – five times annual retainer or base salary for directors and our chief executive officer and three times base salary for our other named executives.
Process of Setting Compensation
Our board of directors has delegated to the committee the primary responsibility for overseeing our executive compensation program. The committee annually reviews and sets the compensation for our executive officers, subject to approval by the full board (excluding the CEO) of all compensation matters regarding our executives and other key management employees, since March 2020. For more information about the committee’s responsibilities, see “Composition and Role of Board Committees – Compensation Committee.”
Role of the Chief Executive Officer. Our CEO makes recommendations to the committee with respect to salary, short-term incentive (bonus), and long-term incentive awards for all executive officers other than himself. He develops those recommendations based on competitive market information generated by the committee’s compensation consultant, the company’s compensation strategy, his assessment of individual performance, and the experience level of the particular executive. After discussing those recommendations with the CEO, its consultant, and amongst themselves, the committee makes the final decisions on executive compensation, subject to approval by the full board (excluding the CEO) since March 2020.
Evaluating the Chief Executive Officers Compensation. In evaluating the CEO’s compensation, the committee reviews the competitive market information provided by its compensation consultant and bases its decisions regarding his compensation on our overall compensation strategy, the CEO’s self-assessment, and the committee’s independent assessment of his performance, using the objectives that the committee established at the beginning of the year as one point of analysis. Since March 2020, the committee’s determinations are then subject to approval by the full board (excluding the CEO). These deliberations are held in executive session so that the CEO is not present when the committee and board make determinations regarding his compensation.
Role of Compensation Consultant. Our committee has sole authority over the selection, use, compensation and retention of any compensation consultant engaged to assist the committee in discharging its responsibilities. During 2020, Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (Meridian) served as the committee’s primary consultant. The committee’s primary consultant also surveys director compensation upon the request of the committee. Meridian has provided no other services to, nor has any other relationship with, our company. As required by SEC rules, the committee has assessed Meridian’s independence with respect to all six independence factors and concluded that Meridian’s work has not raised any conflicts of interest.
Peer Group. In consultation with the consultant, the committee reviews and approves our peer group annually, paying particular attention to mergers, acquisitions, and bankruptcies, each of which may make a peer company more or less aligned to our business. In making its determinations regarding fiscal 2020 compensation, the committee reviewed detailed performance and compensation data on the companies in our peer group.
17

In July 2020, the committee approved certain changes to our peer group based on recommendations from Meridian, including the removal of two peers, Diamond Offshore and Hornbeck Offshore, each of which filed for bankruptcy protection during 2020. Following these adjustments, our peer group consisted of the following 16 companies:
Bristow Group Inc.Newpark Resources
Dril-Quip, Inc.NCS Multistage Holdings
Exterran CorporationOceaneering International
Forum Energy TechnologiesOil States International
Frank’s International NVRigNet, Inc.
Gulf Island FabricationSEACOR Holdings, Inc.
Helix Energy SolutionsSEACOR Marine Holdings
International SeawaysTETRA Technologies
Consideration of Prior Say-on-Pay Vote Results. Since 2011, our board’s policy has been to hold say-on-pay votes at each annual meeting of stockholders, consistent with the board’s voting recommendation on, and the actual results for, each of the two advisory votes on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes that we have held. The most recent such vote was in 2018 and more than 99% of voting shares were cast in favor of continuing to hold annual say-on-pay votes. Our next advisory vote on the frequency of future say-on-pay votes will be held at our 2024 annual meeting of stockholders.
At our 2020 annual meeting, our stockholders approved our executive compensation, with more than 97% of voting shares cast in favor of the say-on-pay resolution at that meeting. The result of the most recent say-on-pay vote is an important point of reference for the committee as it makes executive compensation decisions for a given year. In addition, we regularly engage with stockholders and welcome their feedback on our pay programs throughout the year.
Compensation Components
As noted previously, the three core components of our executive compensation program are base salary, a short-term cash incentive, and long-term incentive awards. This section discusses each of these compensation elements and arrangements as well as the retention bonuses, change of control protections, retirement benefits, and limited perquisites provided to our named executives during fiscal 2020.
Base Salary. In prior years, the committee’s practice has been to review and determine salary levels for named executives prior to the beginning of each fiscal year. Our base salary determinations are based on a variety of factors, including individual performance, market salary levels, our company’s overall financial condition, and industry conditions. The company generally considers the market median of the company’s peer group as the target for total compensation, although individual pay levels may vary from median for a variety of reasons.
18

In April 2020, the committee reviewed base salaries and decided to leave Mr. Kneen’s salary as Chief Executive Officer unchanged. However, the committee increased base salaries for each of the other named executives from $230,000 to $275,000, an increase of slightly under 20%, in order to align salaries more closely with the competitive median, based primarily on the company’s peer group, and to recognize increased individual position responsibilities. Other than Mr. Kneen, each NEO received the increased base salary on a prorated basis, and the actual total base salaries that each NEO received during fiscal years 2019 and 2020 are shown below:
Name and
Principal Position(1)
Fiscal Year
Salary
($)
Quintin V. Kneen
2020500,000
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director2019399,375
Samuel R. Rubio
2020261,875
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer2019230,000
David E. Darling
2020261,875
Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Human Relations Officer2019230,000
Daniel A. Hudson
2020261,875
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary2019197,417
Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation.
Structure of the Program. Our typical practice is to pay short-term cash incentives to our named executives for the purpose of rewarding both the company and individual performance during a given year. During 2020, our STI program was conditioned on the company’s achieving sufficiently positive free cash flow of at least $50 million and allocated the target award among the four separate measures of performance, which were intended to be weighted and evaluated separately, or together, are expectedas follows:
Free Cash Flow (FCF) (60%): FCF is a non-GAAP investment performance indicator which we believe provides useful information regarding the net cash generated by the company before any payments to capital providers. FCF is determined from net cash provided by (used in) operating activities adjusted for capital expenditures, proceeds from asset sales, cash interest expense and interest income;
Operational Efficiency (20%): operational efficiency depends upon our achievement of pre-established goals for the period, such as maximizing the active utilization rate of the available fleet and keeping the professional fees and air freight costs in line;
Safety Performance (10%): safety performance depends upon our achievement of pre-established goals for the period, such as lost-time accidents or our total recordable case frequency or TRCF results; and
Individual Performance (10%): individual performance is based on the committee’s subjective assessment of the individual executive’s performance during the period.
The performance targets established for 2020 were set at a level which was considered challenging, and the potential payout range was set conservatively in the interest of avoiding any unintended windfalls due to market volatility.
Maximizing FCF is one of our most important short-term company strategic objective. We believe that FCF is a core measure of the company’s performance and our focus on FCF is intended, among other things, to incentivize management to focus on key cash generation drivers, such as operating and administrative cost efficiency, optimal capital investments, and timely collection of accounts receivable balances. FCF is also important for long-term stockholder value creation in that it incentives management focused on creating an efficient, scalable growth platform and lower overall net debt levels.
19

We include a safety performance component in our STI program to reinforce our commitment to continue to impactbe an industry leader in safety. We believe that a safe work environment helps us to attract and retain a more experienced work force and gives us a competitive advantage among our peers, both in retaining existing business and when bidding for new work. In addition, a strong safety record helps us to minimize our insurance and loss costs and the demand foroverall cost of doing business.
We also include an operational efficiency component in our services,STI program to reinforce our commitment to enhance our operational efficiency. One of the core objectives to enhance our operational efficiency is to maximize the utilization and/or rates we can achieverate of our fleet to remain active and generate revenues. Also, it is important for us to keep our assetsoperational costs, such as professional fees and services,air freight costs, as low as possible to operate our business efficiently and to remain competitive in the market.
The committee’s practice has been to approve the executive STI program during the first quarter of our fiscal year. In approving the plan, the committee approves the company performance metrics, the specific performance levels for each metric, and the outlooktarget award for our industry in general. See further discussioneach named executive, which is expressed as a percentage of the impactexecutive’s base salary. In March 2020, the committee approved the fiscal 2020 STI program and designated each of COVID-19, including the resulting crude oil demandnamed executives as a participant.
All metrics except for the FCF target, payouts could range between 0 - 100% of the individual component’s target award, depending on performance. Payout on the FCF portion could range from 0 - 125% of the target FCF component, depending on performance. Assuming maximum performance on all metrics, the overall maximum a participant could earn under the fiscal 2020 STI program would be 115% of his target award.
The following chart shows the target award for each participating named executive, expressed as a percentage of his base salary, as well as the dollar amount of the target award he was eligible to receive under the STI program for fiscal 2020:
Named Executive
 
Base Salary(1)
($)
  
Target Award
as % of Salary
(%)
  
Target Award
($)
 
Quintin V. Kneen  500,000   100%   500,000 
Samuel R. Rubio  275,000   70%   192,500 
David E. Darling  275,000   70%   192,500 
Daniel A. Hudson  275,000   70%   192,500 
_________________
(1)Represents the annual base salary for each named executive at the end of fiscal 2020.
_________________
Calculation of 2020 STI Program Metrics and price impact,Payouts. The table below summarizes performance standards and actual achievement for the year. For the Operational Efficiency and Safety performances, performance at or above target results in a 100% payout and performance at or below target results in a 0% payout. For the FCF performance, (i) performance below threshold results in a 0% payout (ii) performance at threshold results in a 75% payout, (iii) performance at target results in 100% payout and (iv) maximum performance or above results in a payout at 125% of target opportunity. Actual payout is calculated using straight line interpolation between threshold and target and between target and maximum.The individual performance was a discretionary component, based on our operationsthe committee’s subjective assessment of the individual executive’s performance. The committee determined that individuals did achieve the 10% in this category.
The performance targets established for 2020 were set at a level which was considered challenging, and our responsesthe potential payout range was set conservatively in the interest of avoiding any unintended windfalls due to market volatility. Despite unexpected challenges faced during 2020 due to the challengesCOVID-19 pandemic, the committee made no adjustment to the goals established for 2020. As shown, actual performance under the plan resulted in a payout at 80% of these events  in Management’s Discussion and Analysistarget, which yielded an aggregate plan payout to all participants of Financial Condition and Results of Operations under Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

approximately $2.8 million.
520

Business Combination

On November 15, 2018 (the Merger Date), we completed our acquisition of GulfMark Offshore, Inc. (GulfMark) pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 15, 2018 (the business combination)

 
Performance Standards
 
Percent
  
Performance
Metric
Threshold
Target
Maximum
Actual
Performance
of
Target
Earned
Times
Weight
Equals
Weighted
Payout
FCF (a)$50.0 MM$73.5 MM$97.0 MM$56.2 MM81.6%60%49.0%
Operational Efficiency (b)See below for three componentsSee below for three componentsSee below for three componentsSee below for three components0%30%0.0%
 --
84%
(Active Utilization)
--< 84%------
 --
$13.1MM
(Professional Fees)
-->13.1MM------
 --
$3.5 MM
(Air
freight costs)
-->3.5MM------
Individual Performance (c)--------100%10%10.0%
Safety (d)--
0.5 LTIF
1.0 TRCF
--
0 LTIF
0.34 TRCF
100%10%10.0%
Adjustment of Individual Performance for Subjective Criteria (e)11.0%
Calculated Percent of Target Earned
80.0%
_____________
(a)
FCF. The objective was to achieve the FCF of $73.5 million, with the minimum threshold of $50.0 million required to fund the 2020 STI program.
(b)
Operational Efficiency. The objectives were to achieve (i) active utilization rate of 84.0%, (ii) professional fees of $13.1 million and (iii) air freight costs of $3.5 million.
(c)
Individual Performance. This is a discretionary component, based on the committee’s subjective assessment of the individual executive’s performance. The committee determined that individuals did achieve the 10.0% in this category.
(d)
Safety. The objectives were to achieve (i) the number of lost time injuries occurring in a workplace per 1 million hours worked, which is referred to as “Lost Time Incident Frequency” or “LTIF”, of 0.5, and the total recordable case frequency in a workplace per 1 million hours worked, which is referred to as “Total Recordable Case Frequency” or “TRCF”, of 1.0.
(e)
Adjustment. Given the significant challenges that the company faced in connection with the COVID-19 pandemic and others during fiscal 2020, the committee adjusted the individual performance component by increasing its weighted payout by 11.0%.
Long-Term Incentive Compensation. The business combination was effected through a two-step reverse merger. GulfMark’s results are included in our consolidated results beginning oncompany maintains two long-term incentive (“LTI”) plans, the Merger Date. Refer to Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details on our merger with GulfMark.

Upon consummation of the business combination, GulfMark stockholders received 1.10Tidewater Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the Exchange Ratio) shares of Tidewater common stock in exchange for each share of GulfMark common stock owned.  Additionally, all outstanding GulfMark warrants issued to stockholders prior to the business combination and restricted stock units granted to GulfMark directors and management prior to the business combination were converted into substantially similar warrants or restricted stock awards to acquire Tidewater common stock with the number of warrants or restricted stock units being adjusted by the Exchange Ratio. Immediately following the completion of the business combination, the former Tidewater stockholders and GulfMark stockholders owned 74% and 26% of the combined company, respectively. The business combination resulted in a total purchase consideration of $385.5 million.

Offices and Facilities

Our worldwide headquarters and principal executive offices are located at 6002 Rogerdale Road, Suite 600, Houston, Texas 77072, and our telephone number is (713) 470-5300. Our U.S. marine operations are based in Amelia, Louisiana and Houston, Texas. We conduct our international operations through facilities and offices located in over 30 countries. Our principal international offices and/or warehouse facilities, most of which are leased, are located in Rio de Janeiro and Macae, Brazil; Ciudad Del Carmen, Mexico;Chaguaramus, Trinidad; Aberdeen, Scotland; Cairo, Egypt; Luanda and Cabinda, Angola; Lagos and Onne Port, Nigeria; Douala, Cameroon; Singapore; Al Khobar, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia; Dubai, United Arab Emirates; and Oslo, Sandnes, Norway. Our operations generally do not require highly specialized facilities, and suitable facilities are generally available on a leased basis as required.

Reporting Segments and Vessel Classifications

Our reporting segments are based on geographic markets: the Americas segment, which includes the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, Trinidad, Mexico and Brazil; the Middle East/Asia Pacific segment, which includes Saudi Arabia, East Africa, Southeast Asia and Australia; the Europe/Mediterranean segment, which includes the United Kingdom, Norway and Egypt; and the West Africa segment; which includes Angola, Nigeria, and other coastal regions of West Africa. Our vessels routinely move from one geographic region and reporting segment to another, and from one operating area to another operating area within the geographic regions and reporting segments. Discussed below are our three major vessel classes along with a description of the type of vessels categorized in each vessel class and the services the respective vessels typically perform.

Deepwater Vessels

Deepwater vessels, in the aggregate, are usually our largest contributor to consolidated vessel revenue and vessel operating margin. Included in this vessel class are large platform supply vessels (PSVs) (typically longer than 230-feet and/or with greater than 2,800 tons in dead weight cargo carrying capacity) and large, higher-horsepower anchor handling tug supply vessels (AHTS vessels) (generally greater than 10,000 horsepower). These vessels are generally chartered to customers for use in transporting supplies and equipment from shore bases to deepwater and intermediate water depth offshore drilling rigs and production platforms and for otherwise supporting intermediate and deepwater drilling, production, construction and maintenance operations. Deepwater PSVs generally have large cargo carrying capacities, both below deck (liquid mud tanks and dry bulk tanks) and above deck. Deepwater AHTS vessels are equipped to tow drilling rigs and other marine equipment, as well as to set anchors for the positioning and mooring of drilling rigs that generally do not have dynamic positioning capabilities. Many of our deepwater PSVs and AHTS vessels are outfitted with dynamic positioning capabilities, which allow the vessels to maintain an absolute or relative position when mooring to an offshore installation, rig or another vessel is deemed unsafe, impractical or undesirable. Many of our deepwater PSVs and AHTS vessels also have oil recovery, firefighting, standby rescue and/or other specialized equipment. Our customers have high standards in regard to safety and other operational competencies and capabilities, in part to meet the regulatory standards that continue to be more stringent.

6

Our deepwater class of vessels also includes specialty vessels that can support offshore well stimulation, construction work, subsea services and/or serve as remote accommodation facilities. These vessels are generally available for routine supply and towing services, but are also outfitted, and primarily intended, for specialty services. For example, these vessels can be equipped with a variety of lifting and deployment systems, including large capacity cranes, winches or reel systems.

Towing-Supply Vessels

Included in this class are non-deepwater AHTS vessels with horsepower below 10,000 BHP, and non-deepwater PSVs that are generally less than 230 feet in length. The vessels in this class perform the same respective functions and services as deepwater AHTS vessels and deepwater PSVs except towing-supply vessels are generally chartered to customers for use in intermediate and shallow waters.

Other Vessels

Included in this class are crew boats, utility vessels and offshore tugs. Crew boats and utility vessels are chartered to customers for use in transporting personnel and supplies from shore bases to offshore drilling rigs, platforms and other installations. These vessels are also often equipped for oil field security missions in markets where piracy, kidnapping or other potential violence presents a concern. Offshore tugs are used to tow floating drilling rigs and barges; to assist in the docking of tankers; and to assist pipe laying, cable laying and construction barges.

Customers and Contracting

Our operations are dependent upon the levels of activity in offshore crude oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production throughout the world, which are affected by trends in global crude oil and natural gas pricing, including expectations of future commodity pricing, which are ultimately influenced by the supply and demand relationship for these natural resources. The activity levels of our customers are also influenced by the cost (and relative cost) of exploring for and producing crude oil and natural gas offshore, which can be affected by environmental regulations, technological advances that affect energy production and consumption, significant weather conditions, the ability of our customers to raise capital, and local and international economic and political environments, including government mandated moratoriums.

Our primary source of revenue is derived from time charter contracts on our vessels on a rate per day of service basis; therefore, vessel revenues are recognized on a daily basis throughout the contract period.

The following table discloses our customers that accounted for 10% or more of total revenues:

  

Years Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Chevron Corporation

  14.3%  13.0%  15.0%
Saudi Aramco  11.5%  *   * 

* Less than 10% of total revenues.

While it is normal for our customer base to change over time as our vessel time charter contracts turn over, the unexpected loss of any of our significant customers could, at least in the short term, have a material adverse effect on our vessel utilization and our results of operations. Our five and ten largest customers accounted for approximately 41.8% and 59.8% of our total revenues for the year ended December 31, 2020, respectively.

Competition

We have numerous mid-size and large competitors. The principal competitive factors for the offshore vessel service industry are the quality, suitability and technical capabilities of our vessels, availability of vessels and related equipment, price and quality of service. In addition, the ability to demonstrate a strong record for safety and efficiency and attract and retain qualified and skilled personnel are also important competitive factors. We have numerous competitors in all areas in which we operate around the world, and the business environment in each of these markets is highly competitive. Competition in international markets may be adversely affected by regulations requiring, among other things, local construction, flagging, ownership or control of vessels, the awarding of contracts to local contractors, the employment of local citizens and/or the purchase of supplies from local vendors.

7

Our diverse, mobile asset base and the wide geographic distribution of our assets generally enable us to respond relatively quickly to changes in market conditions and to provide a broad range of vessel services to customers around the world. We believe that the size, age, diversity and geographic distribution of a vessel operator’s fleet, economies of scale and experience level in the many areas of the world are competitive advantages in our industry. In the Americas region, we benefit from cabotage which includes rules and restrictions promulgated thereunder by the Merchant Marine Act of 1920 and the Shipping Act, 1916, as amended,  (collectively, the Jones Act)“2017 Plan”), which limit vessels that can operate in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico to those owned by companies that qualify as U.S. citizens. Also, in certain foreign countries, preferences given to vessels owned by local companies may be mandated by local law or by national oil companies. We have attempted to mitigate some of the impact of such preferences through affiliations with local companies.

Increases in worldwide vessel capacity generally have the effect of lowering charter rates, particularly when there are lower levels of exploration, field development and production activity in the oil and natural gas industry, as has been the case since late calendar 2014 when oil prices began to trend lower. In addition, the COVID-19 pandemic has created additional oversupply as customers have cancelled or delayed projects as discussed above.

Angolan Joint Venture (Sonatide)

We previously disclosed the significant financial and operational challenges that we confront with respect to operations in Angola, as well as steps that we have taken to address or mitigate those risks. Most of our attention has been focused in three areas: (i) reducing the net receivable balance due from Sonatide, our Angolan joint venture with Sonangol, for vessel services; (ii) reducing the foreign currency risk created by virtue of provisions of Angolan law that require that payment for a  portion of the services provided by Sonatide be paid in Angolan kwanza; and (iii) optimizing opportunities, consistent with Angolan law, for services provided by us to be paid for directly in U.S. dollars.  The amounts due from Sonatide are denominated in U.S. dollars; however, the underlying third-party customer payments to Sonatide were satisfied, in part, in Angolan kwanzas. We and Sonangol, our partner in Sonatide, have had discussions regarding how the net losses from the devaluation of certain Angolan kwanza denominated accounts should be shared.  In late 2019, we were informed that, as part of a broad privatization program, Sonangol intends to seek to divest itself from Sonatide.

In the second quarter of 2020, Sonatide declared a $35.0 million dividend.  On June 22, 2020, Sonangol received $17.8 million and we received $17.2 million.  Our share of the dividend is reflected as dividend income from unconsolidated company in the consolidated statement of operations because (i) our investment in Sonatide had previously been written down to zero, (ii) the distributions are not refundable and (iii) we are not liable for the obligations of or committed to provide financial support to Sonatide.  In addition,became effective as a result of the aforementioned dividend payment, the cash balancesrestructuring of the joint venturecompany in 2017, and the Tidewater Inc. Legacy GLF Management Incentive Plan (the “Legacy GLF Plan”), which was originally adopted by GulfMark but was assumed and converted by us in the business combination.

21

Given recent senior leadership changes and to address potential retention and motivation concerns, in early 2020, the committee, with the assistance of its compensation consultant, conducted a comprehensive executive compensation review. As a result, the committee granted time-based restricted stock units to each named executive and for Mr. Kneen, stock options with a premium exercise price equal to 125% of the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant.
For each named executive, his award (RSUs and, for Mr. Kneen, stock options) vests in three equal installments on the first three anniversaries of the date of grant, contingent upon his continued employment on the vesting date (except in the case of death or termination due to disability). Mr. Kneen’s stock options have a maximum term of ten years.
In light of COVID-related stock price declines during 2020, and to help manage dilution, the committee used a 60-day average stock price to determine the number of shares to grant to our NEOs. This methodology led to actual grant values that were significantlyroughly 38% below the intended target grant value in aggregate as shown below:
Named Executive
 
2020 Target
Grant Value
  
60-Day
Average
Stock Price
(1)
  
Premium
Stock
Options
(#)
  
Restricted
Stock Units
(#)
  
Stock Price
on Date of
Grant
(2)
  
Grant Date
Value of
2020 Grant
  
Percent
Decrease
from Target
Grant Value
 
Quintin V. Kneen $2,500,000  $10.99   344,598   113,717  $5.18  $1,702,107   -32%
Samuel R. Rubio $330,000  $10.99   --   30,021  $5.18  $155,509   -53%
David E. Darling $330,000  $10.99   --   30,021  $5.18  $155,509   -53%
Daniel A. Hudson $330,000  $10.99   --   30,021  $5.18  $155,509   -53%
TOTAL
 $3,490,000                  $2,168,634   -38%
Retention Bonuses. In early 2020, given the uncertainty surrounding efforts to contain the global COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting pressure on the world’s economies, the committee installed a retention program for current officers and certain other key employees to preserve management through any payout of the 2020 STI program. As part of this retention program, each designated participant, including all four named executives, entered into a retention agreement with the company that provided for the payment of a cash retention award no later than April 30, 2020. Under that agreement, the retention awards are subject to a recapture provision which will be triggered if the participant’s employment terminated within a year of the agreement’s execution. Each of Messrs. Kneen, Rubio and Darling received a retention award in the amount of $300,000 while Mr. Hudson received a retention award in the amount of $210,000. At April 30, 2021, all four of the named executives will successfully complete their retention periods. The retention award amounts for each named executive are reported in his “Bonus” column of the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table.
Retirement Benefits. Our named executives participate in employee benefit plans generally available to all employees, including a qualified defined contribution retirement plan (the “401(k) Savings Plan”). We have a broad-based legacy Pension Plan, which has been frozen and closed to new participants for nearly a decade. Mr. Darling is the only named executive who participates in our Pension Plan. Since his participation is based on his prior employment with us (from 1983 to 1996), he is currently in payout status and receives a modest annual benefit ($2,227). Mr. Darling will not accrue any additional benefits under the Pension Plan for his current service (he rejoined us in March 2018). Since January 1, 2011, when the Pension Plan was frozen, all qualified retirement benefits have been provided through our 401(k) Savings Plan.
In addition to these broad-based programs, we provide our executives with a non-qualified deferred compensation plan, the Supplemental Savings Plan (the “SSP”), which acts as a supplement to our 401(k) Savings Plan. The SSP is designed to provide retirement benefits to our officers that they are precluded from receiving under the underlying qualified plans due to the compensation and benefit limits in the Internal Revenue Code. None of our named executives have elected to participate in the SSP.
We also sponsor a Supplement Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”), which has been closed to new participants since 2010 and frozen from additional accruals since 2018. None of our named executives participates in the SERP.
22

Change of Control Agreements. During 2020, we had change in control agreements with all four of our named executives, which are described below as our “legacy change of control agreements.” However, these agreements have been superseded by the combined severance and change of control agreements approved by our board on March 9, 2021, which are described further below in the section entitled, “Fiscal 2021 Consolidation of Employment-Related Agreements.”
We continue to offer our executives change of control benefits for several reasons. We believe that offering these protections to our executives and other key personnel is an important part of good corporate governance, as they alleviate individual concerns about the possible involuntary loss of employment and ensure that the interests of our named executives will be materially consistent with the interests of our stockholders when considering corporate transactions. In addition, we believe that these change of control protections preserve morale and productivity and encourage retention in the face of the potential disruptive impact of an actual or potential change of control of our company.
Our legacy change of control agreements had an initial term of one year (ending on December 31) but were subject to one-year “evergreen” renewal periods unless the company provided written notice to the officer by June 30 of a given year that it did not wish to extend the agreement past its then-current term.
The legacy agreement provided the officer with certain employment protections for a two-year period following a change in control of the company. In addition, if the officer were terminated without “cause” or terminated his own employment with “good reason” during that two-year protected period (as defined in the agreement), he would be entitled to receive certain payments and benefits. Specifically, among other benefits, the officer would be entitled to receive: (1) a cash severance payment equal to a specific multiple (three times for the chief executive officer, two times for the executive vice presidents, and one time for vice president) of the sum of (a) his base salary in effect at the time of termination and (b) the greater of his average bonus over the last three years and his target bonus; (2) a pro-rata cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs; (3) a cash payment equal to any unpaid bonus with respect to a completed fiscal year as calculated by the Agreement; (4) a lump sum cash payment for continuation coverage under the Company’s health benefit plans; (5) immediate vesting of any outstanding but unvested equity awards as of the termination date, including retention of unexercised stock options to term; and (7) treatment of any performance conditions to have been achieved at target level for any equity awards for which vesting or payout is subject to performance conditions.
Under the legacy agreement, the officer would not be entitled to any tax gross-ups for excise taxes that may be triggered under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. However, the officer would be entitled to receive the “best net” treatment, which means that if the total of all change of control payments due him exceeds the threshold that would trigger the imposition of excise taxes, the officer will either (1) receive all payments and benefits due him and be responsible for paying all such taxes or (2) have his payments and benefits reduced such that imposition of the excise taxes is no longer triggered, depending on which method provides him the better after-tax result.
Other Benefits and Perquisites. We also provide certain limited perquisites to our named executives. For 2020, these perquisites consisted primarily of club dues for one country club membership. We do not provide tax gross-ups on any perquisites.
Employment Agreements. During 2020, we had employment agreements with two of our named executives, Messrs. Kneen and Rubio, which are described below as our “legacy employment agreements.” However, these agreements have been superseded by the combined severance and change of control agreements approved by our board on March 9, 2021, which are described further below in the section entitled, “Fiscal 2021 Consolidation of Employment-Related Agreements.”
23

Mr. Kneen. We were party to a legacy employment agreement with Mr. Kneen, which was initially assumed in the business combination with GulfMark and was amended upon his promotion to President and CEO in September 2019. Mr. Kneen continued to serve as our Chief Financial Officer on an interim basis until March 2021, when Mr. Rubio was appointed to that role. Under his legacy employment agreement, Mr. Kneen was entitled to receive an annual base salary of no less than $500,000 and to participate in our STI program with an annual target opportunity of 100% of base salary, and was eligible to participate in any LTI program for executive officers.
To induce Mr. Kneen to join us as our Chief Financial Officer following the GulfMark business combination, the committee awarded him an initial LTI grant of time-based RSUs with a grant date value of $1,050,000, which will vest in equal installments over the first three anniversaries of the date of grant. The value of this initial LTI grant was based on the severance for which Mr. Kneen would have been eligible had he not accepted our offer of continued employment. In addition, Mr. Kneen’s legacy GulfMark RSUs, which were assumed and converted by us in the business combination (his “converted RSUs”), remained outstanding subject to their original vesting schedule (with the last such tranche vesting on April 13, 2021).
In the event of Mr. Kneen’s death or termination due to disability during the term of his legacy employment agreement, Mr. Kneen would be entitled to receive a pro-rata STI award for the year of termination based on actual performance and the vesting of any unvested portion of his initial LTI grant and his converted RSUs would accelerate. In addition, if Mr. Kneen’s employment were terminated by the company without “cause” or if he terminated his employment with “good reason” during the term of his legacy employment agreement, then, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims against the company, Mr. Kneen would be entitled to receive certain payments and benefits. Specifically, in such event, Mr. Kneen would be entitled to receive a lump sum cash severance equal to 24 months’ of then-current base salary, a lump sum cash payment equal to the total premiums that Mr. Kneen would have been required to pay for 12 months of continuation coverage under the Company’s health plans, and would remain eligible to receive a pro rata bonus under the STI program for the year of termination based on actual performance. In addition, any unvested portion of his initial LTI grant and his converted RSUs would automatically vest in full.
Mr. Kneen’s legacy employment agreement contained certain restrictive covenants that apply during and after his employment, including an agreement to not disclose confidential information and, for a one-year period following his termination of employment for any reason, non-competition and non-solicitation agreements. As noted above, in addition to his employment agreement, Mr. Kneen was party to a legacy change of control agreement with us. If a “change of control” (as defined in the legacy change of control agreement) occurred during the term of the legacy change of control agreement, then that agreement would govern the terms of Mr. Kneen’s employment and his legacy employment agreement would be of no further force and effect.
Mr. Rubio. Mr. Rubio also joined us following our business combination with GulfMark and we determinedare party to a legacy employment agreement with him that was assumed in that business combination and was amended and restated to reflect his employment with us. Under this agreement, which is in effect through December 28, 2021, Mr. Rubio is entitled to receive an annual base salary of no less than $230,000 and to participate in our STI program with an annual target opportunity of 70% of base salary. Mr. Rubio received two initial LTI grants, the first consisting of 10,000 of time-based RSUs (the “First Rubio Grant”) and the second with a grant date target value of $360,950 (the “Second Rubio Grant” and, together with the First Rubio Grant, the “Rubio Grants”), each of which will vest in three equal installments on December 28 of 2019, 2020, and 2021. In the event of Mr. Rubio’s death or termination due to disability during the term of his legacy employment agreement, any unvested portion of the Rubio Grants would automatically vest in full. If, during the term of the legacy employment agreement, we terminated Mr. Rubio’s employment without “cause” or if he terminated his employment with “good reason” (each as defined in the legacy employment agreement), then, subject to his execution and non-revocation of a general release of claims against the company, any unvested portion of the Second Rubio Grant would automatically vest in full. Mr. Rubio’s legacy employment agreement contained certain restrictive covenants that apply during and after his employment, including an agreement to not disclose confidential information and, for a one-year period following his termination of employment for any reason, non-competition and non-solicitation agreements. As noted above, in addition to his legacy employment agreement, Mr. Rubio was party to a legacy change of control agreement with us during 2020. If a “change of control” (as defined in the legacy change of control agreement) occurred during the term of the legacy change of control agreement, that agreement would govern the terms of Mr. Rubio’s employment and his legacy employment agreement would be of no further force and effect.
24

Fiscal 2021 Consolidation of Employment-Related Agreements. Effective March 9, 2021, our board approved a new form of severance and change of control agreement to be entered into with each of the named executives (referred to below as the “consolidated agreement”). This new consolidated agreement supersedes all prior employment-related agreements between the company and named executive, including the legacy employment agreements with Messrs. Kneed and Rubio and the legacy change of control agreements with each of the four named executives. The severance payment multiples for Mr. Kneen did not change under the new consolidated agreement, and the severance payment multiples for Messrs. Rubio, Hudson, and Darling reflect their recent promotions to Executive Vice President.
The consolidated agreement has an initial term through December 31, 2021 but is subject to one-year “evergreen” renewal periods unless the company provides written notice to officer by June 30 of a given year that it does not wish to extend the agreement past its current term.
The consolidated agreement provides each officer with certain employment protections for a two-year period following a change in control of the company. If the officer experiences a qualifying termination during that two-year protected period (if either the company terminates him without cause or the officer terminates his own employment with good reason), he will be entitled to receive certain payments and benefits, including: (1) a cash severance payment equal to a specific multiple (three times for the chief executive officer, two times for the executive vice presidents, and one time for vice president) of the sum of (a) his base salary in effect at the time of termination and (b) the greater of his average bonus over the last three years and his target bonus; (2) a pro-rata cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs; (3) a cash payment equal to any unpaid bonus with respect to a completed fiscal year as calculated by the agreement; (4) a lump sum cash payment for continuation coverage under the company’s health benefit plans; (5) immediate vesting of any outstanding but unvested equity awards as of the termination date, including retention of unexercised stock options to term; and (7) treatment of any performance conditions to have been achieved at target level for any equity awards for which vesting or payout is subject to performance conditions.
In addition, the consolidated agreement provides that if the officer experiences a qualifying termination (if either the company terminates him without cause or the officer terminates his own employment with good reason) during the term of the agreement but outside of any change of control protected period, he will be entitled to receive, among other benefits: (1) a cash severance payment equal to a specific multiple (two times for the chief executive officer, one-and-a-half times for the executive vice presidents, and a half time for vice president) of the sum of (a) his base salary in effect at the time of termination and (b) his target bonus, to be paid over a specified number of months following the termination date; (2) a pro-rata cash bonus for the fiscal year in which the termination occurs; (3) a lump sum cash payment for continuation coverage under the company’s health benefit plans; (4) immediate vesting of any unvested portion of his time-based equity awards which was scheduled to vest within 12 months of the termination date; and (5) retention of any unvested portion of his performance-based equity awards vesting within 12 months of the termination date, subject to the original performance conditions and payout timing.
Under the consolidated agreement, similar to the legacy change of control agreements, the officer would not be entitled to any tax gross-ups for excise taxes that may be triggered under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. However, the officer would be entitled to receive the “best net” treatment, which means that if the total of all change of control payments due him exceeds the threshold that would trigger the imposition of excise taxes, the officer will either (1) receive all payments and benefits due him and be responsible for paying all such taxes or (2) have his payments and benefits reduced such that imposition of the excise taxes is no longer triggered, depending on which method provides him the better after-tax result.
Similar to the legacy employment agreements, the consolidated agreements contain certain restrictive covenants that apply during and after the officer’s employment, including an agreement to not disclose confidential information and, for a specified period of time following his termination of employment for any reason (other than a termination that occurs during a protected period by the company without cause or by the officer with good reason), non-competition and non-solicitation agreements.
25

Compensation and Equity Ownership Policies
Clawback Policy. Under our Executive Compensation Recovery Policy, we may recover cash and equity incentive compensation awarded if the compensation was based on the achievement of financial results that were the subject of a subsequent restatement of our financial statements if the executive officer engaged in intentional misconduct that caused the need for a restatement and the effect was to increase the amount of the incentive compensation.
Stock Ownership Guidelines. Under our stock ownership guidelines, our officers are required to hold the following amounts of company stock within five years of becoming an officer:
5x salary for the chief executive officer;
3x salary for the chief operating officer, chief financial officer, and executive vice presidents; and
2x salary for all other officers.
If an officer’s ownership requirement increases because of a change in title or if a new officer is added, a five-year period to achieve the incremental requirement begins in January following the year of the title change or addition as an officer. For our executives, the guidelines specify that time-based equity awards count as shares of company stock but performance-based awards do not. Each of our executives, like the members of our board, has until the fifth anniversary of his or her appointment to come into compliance with these guidelines.
Prohibition on Hedging and Pledging Transactions. Each of our named executives is subject to our Policy Statement on Insider Trading, an internal company policy adopted by our board. This policy includes a blanket prohibition on engaging in certain forms of hedging or monetization transactions, such as prepaid variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, and exchange funds with respect to our securities, regardless of whether those securities were received as compensation. This prohibition applies to all company insiders (including our directors and our named executives) as well as all of our other employees. In addition, the policy includes a blanket prohibition on insiders pledging company securities as collateral for a loan or any other purpose.
Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
The current members of our compensation committee are Messrs. Raspino, Traub and Zabrocky and, during 2020, Mr. Fagerstal also served on our compensation committee. None of these individuals has been an officer or employee of our company or any of our subsidiaries. No executive officer of our company served in the last fiscal year as a result,director or member of the compensation committee of another entity one of whose executive officers served as a significant portionmember of our net due from Sonatide balance was compromised.  Duringboard or on our compensation committee.
COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REPORT
The compensation committee has reviewed and discussed with management the Compensation Discussion and Analysis required by Item 402(b) of Regulation S-K. Based upon this review and discussion, the committee recommended to the board of directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Form 10-K/A.
Compensation Committee:
Louis A. Raspino, Chairman
Kenneth H. Traub
Lois K. Zabrocky
26

FISCAL 2020 SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE
The following table summarizes the compensation paid to each of our named executives in all capacities in which they served for each of the last three completed fiscal years (2020, 2019, and 2018).
Name and
Principal
Position(1)
Fiscal Year
Salary
($)
Bonus(2)
($)
Stock
Awards(3)
($)
Option
Awards(4)
($)
Non-
Equity
Incentive
Plan
Compen-
sation(5)
($)
Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compen-
sation
Earnings(6)
($)
All
Other
Compen-
sation(7)
($)
Total
($)
Quintin V. Kneen
2020500,000300,000589,0541,113,052400,000--21,1102,923,216
President, Chief Executive Officer, and Director2019399,375--1,000,017------18,5121,417,904
 201862,521--1,060,005--------1,122,526
Samuel R. Rubio
Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, and Chief Accounting Officer
2020261,875300,000155,509--154,000--975872,359
 2019230,000--164,004------975394,979
David E. Darling
Executive Vice President Chief Operating Officer, and Chief Human Relations Officer
2020261,875300,000155,509--154,0003,541975875,900
 2019230,000--164,004----3,253975398,232
Daniel A. Hudson
Executive Vice President, General Counsel, and Secretary
2020261,875210,000155,509--154,000--975782,359
 2019197,417--130,022------975328,414
_________________________
(1)Reflects the positions held by each named executive as of the record date. At the end of fiscal 2020, Mr. Kneen was serving as interim Chief Financial Officer. On March 9, 2021, each of Messrs. Rubio, Darling, and Hudson was promoted from Vice President to Executive Vice President and two were given additional titles (Mr. Rubio was named Chief Financial Officer, succeeding Mr. Kneen in that position, and Mr. Darling was named Chief Operating Officer).
27

(2)Represents cash retention bonuses paid to each named executive in early 2020. These bonuses were subject to clawback if the named executive terminated employment within a one-year period following execution of his retention bonus agreement.
(3)For 2020, this figure represents the grant date value of time-based RSU grants made to our named executives. We value time-based RSUs based on the aggregate grant date fair value computed in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718 at the closing sale price per share of our common stock on the date of grant. For information regarding the assumptions made by us in valuing these RSUs, please see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
(4)Represents the grant date value of an award of non-qualified stock options to Mr. Kneen. We calculate the aggregate grant date fair value of these options, which have an exercise price equal to 125% of the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant, using a Black-Scholes option model. For information regarding the assumptions made by us in valuing these options, please see Note 10 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
(5)Represents payouts under our fiscal 2020 STI program. For more information on this program, see “Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation.”
(6)Reflects the change from the prior fiscal year in the actuarial present value of the accumulated benefit under our Pension Plan, which has been closed to new participants since 2010. Mr. Darling is the only named executive who is a participant in the Pension Plan and, as discussed in greater detail under “Fiscal 2020 Pension Benefits,” his participation is based on his prior service with Tidewater from 1983 to 1996. He is currently in payout status and receives payments in the form of a 50% joint and contingent annuity (approximately $2,227 per year). He will not accrue any additional benefits for his current service.
(7)Consists of the cost of company-paid parking (for each of Messrs. Kneen, Rubio, Darling, and Hudson, $975), and certain club memberships (for Mr. Kneen, $20,135). We do not reimburse any executive for tax liability incurred in connection with any perquisite.
28

FISCAL 2020 GRANTS OF PLAN-BASED AWARDS
The following table presents additional information regarding all equity and non-equity incentive plan awards granted to our named executives during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
  
Estimated Future Payouts
Under Non-Equity
Incentive Plan Awards
 
All Other
Stock
Awards:
 
All Other Option
Awards:
  
Name and
Type of Grant
Grant Date
Threshold
($)
Target/
Maximum
($)
 
Number of
Shares of
Stock or
Units
(#)
 
Number of
Securities
Underlying
Options
(#)
Exercise
or Base
Price
($/Sh)
 
Grant Date
Fair Value
of Stock
Awards
($)
Quintin V. Kneen
          
Annual Cash Incentive(1)
----500,000       
TB RSU Grant(2)
4/20/20   113,717    589,055
Stock Option(3)
4/20/20     344,5986.475 1,113,052
Samuel R. Rubio
          
Annual Cash Incentive(1)
----192,500       
TB RSU Grant(2)
4/20/20   30,021    155,509
David E. Darling
          
Annual Cash Incentive(1)
----192,500       
TB RSU Grant(2)
4/20/20   30,021    155,509
Daniel A. Hudson
          
Annual Cash Incentive(1)
----192,500       
TB RSU Grant(2)
4/20/20   30,021    155,509
_________________________
(1)Each of our named executives was eligible to receive an annual cash incentive under our short-term incentive program based on the achievement of certain company and individual performance goals during fiscal 2020 (the 2020 STI program). For 2020, no threshold amount was set and each officer’s target award also served as his maximum possible award under the plan. This chart reflects the potential payouts under the 2020 STI program; the actual amount earned by each executive is reported in the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table in the column entitled, “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” for 2020. For more information regarding our 2020 STI program, please see the section entitled, “Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation.”
(2)Represents a grant of time-based restricted stock units that vest one-third per year on April 20 of 2021, 2022, and 2023, subject to the executive’s continued employment through such date.
(3)Represents a stock option grant to Mr. Kneen with a premium per-share exercise price (125% of the closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant). These options vest one-third per year on April 15 of 2021, 2022, and 2023, subject to the executive’s continued employment through such date.
29

Salary. Salaries paid to each named executive for fiscal 2020 we recordedaccounted for the following percentages of their total annual compensation (not including changes in pension value and nonqualified deferred compensation earnings): Mr. Kneen, 17%; Mr. Rubio, 30%; Mr. Darling, 30%; and Mr. Hudson, 33%.
Non-equity Incentive Plan Compensation. Our 2020 STI program allocated the target award among four separate metrics, which are intended to be weighted and evaluated separately, as follows: a $40.9 million affiliate credit loss impairment expense.

ReferCFFO target (60% of the overall target award); a safety performance target (10% of the overall target award); an operational efficiency target (20% of the overall target award); and individual performance goals (10% of the overall target award). Actual performance under the 2020 STI plan resulted in a payout of 80% of target award for each participant, including our named executives. For more information, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Components – Short-Term Cash Incentive Compensation.”

Long-Term Incentive Compensation. In April 2020, the committee granted equity awards to Note 5our executive officers. Each named executive received a grant of Notestime-based RSUs that will vest one-third per year over a three-year period. In addition, Mr. Kneen received grant of stock options that vest one-third per year over a three-year period. The exercise price of Mr. Kneen’s stock options was set at a premium, specifically, 125% of the closing price of a share of common stock on the grant date. For more information, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Components – Long-term Incentive Compensation.”
Employment Agreements. We had two legacy employment agreements in effect with our executive officers during 2020 – one with Mr. Kneen, our President and Chief Executive Officer, and one with Mr. Rubio, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, who served as Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer in 2020. For details regarding these agreements, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Components – Employment Agreements.”
In addition, during 2020, each of our current named executives was party to a legacy change of control agreement, which provided for certain employment protections for the Consolidated Financial Statements includedexecutive following a change of control of the company. For each of Messrs. Kneen and Rubio, in Item 8the event that a change of this Annual Report on Form 10-K forcontrol occurred during the term of his legacy change of control agreement, his legacy employment agreement would be of no further details on Sonatide.

Nigerian Joint Venture (DTDW)

We own 40% of DTDW in Nigeria.  Our partner, who owns 60%, is a Nigerian national.  DTDW owns one offshore service vesselforce and has long term debt of $4.7 million which is securedeffect and his employment will be governed by the vessellegacy change of control agreement.

30

However, these agreements were superseded by a combined severance and guarantees from the DTDW partners. We also operate company owned vesselschange in Nigeria for which the joint venture receives a commission.  Ascontrol agreement entered into with each named executive that was approved by our board on March 9, 2021. For more information on all of these agreements, please see “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Compensation Components.”
OUTSTANDING EQUITY AWARDS AT 2020 FISCAL YEAR END
The following table details all outstanding equity awards held by our named executives as of December 31, 2020.
  
Option Awards(1)
 
Stock Awards
 
  
Securities underlying
Unexercised Options
       
Unvested Equity
Incentive Plan
Awards
  
Unvested Stock
Awards
 
Name
 
(#)
Exercisable
  
(#)
Unexercis-
able
  
Exercise
Price
 
Expira-
tion Date
 
Number
of
Shares or
Units(2)
(#)
  
Market
Value(3)
($)
  
Number
of
Shares or
Units(4)
(#)
  
Market
Value(3)
($)
 
Quintin V. Kneen  --   344,598   6.475 4/20/30  20,408   176,325   161,618   1,396,380 
Samuel R. Rubio  --   --        3,347   28,918   41,774   360,927 
David E. Darling  --   --        3,347   28,918   55,585   480,254 
Daniel A. Hudson  --   --        --   --   33,559   289,950 
_________________________
(1)Represents stock options granted to Mr. Kneen with a premium exercise price per share (125% of closing price of a share of our common stock on the date of grant). These options will vest one-third per year on April 15 of each of 2021, 2022, and 2023.
(2)Represents performance-based RSUs that will vest and pay out in shares of common stock on April 15, 2023 based on the company’s achievement of two separate three-year performance metrics and the named executive’s continued service through the vesting date. Vesting of one-half depends on the company’s total stockholder return as measured against that of its peer group for the three-year period while vesting of the other half depends on the simple average of the company’s return on invested capital (“ROIC”) for each year in the three-year period. The RSU grant represents the target award; however, payout may range between 0 - 200% depending on the company’s actual performance. For more details about these awards, which were granted in fiscal 2019, please see our definitive proxy statement for our 2020 annual meeting of stockholders.
(3)The market value of all reported stock awards is based on the closing price of our common stock on December 31, 2020, as reported on the NYSE ($8.64).
(4)Represents time-based RSUs that vest as follows, subject to the named executive’s continued service through the vesting date:
31

  
Time-Based RSUs by Vesting Date
    
Name 3/19/21
(#)
  4/13/21
(#)
  4/15/21
(#)
  4/20/21
(#)
  12/28/21
(#)
  4/15/22
(#)
  4/20/22
(#)
  4/20/23
(#)
  Total 
Mr. Kneen  --   16,120   6,803   37,906   18,175   6,803   37,906   37,905   161,618 
Mr. Rubio  --   --   1,116   10,007   9,522   1,115   10,007   10,007   41,774 
Mr. Darling  23,333   --   1,116   10,007   --   1,115   10,007   10,007   55,685 
Mr. Hudson  --   --   1,769   10,007   --   1,769   10,007   10,007   33,559 
OPTION EXERCISES AND STOCK AWARDS VESTED IN FISCAL YEAR 2020
The following table sets forth information regarding all stock awards that vested during fiscal 2020 for each of our named executives. No stock options were exercised during fiscal 2020.
  
Stock Awards
 
Name
 
Number of Shares
Acquired on Vesting(1)
(#)
  
Value Realized on
Vesting(2)
($)
 
Quintin V. Kneen  41,100   315,566 
Samuel R. Rubio  10,638   90,373 
David E. Darling  24,449   134,582 
Daniel A. Hudson  5,580   38,175 

(1)This figure represents the total number of shares that the named executive was entitled to receive under all stock awards held by him that vested in 2020.
(2)Based on the closing price of our common stock on the date of vesting (or, if our common stock did not trade that day, on the previous trading day).
FISCAL 2020 PENSION BENEFITS
The following table sets forth information relating to our named executives who participate in our defined benefit pension plan (“Pension Plan”). As described in greater detail below, in 2010, the Pension Plan was closed to new participants and frozen such that no additional benefits will accrue to existing participants. Mr. Darling is the only named executive who participates in the Pension Plan. We also sponsor a supplemental executive retirement plan (“SERP”), although it is closed to new participants, frozen from further accruals, and none of our named executives participate in it.
Name
Plan Name
 
Number of Years of
Credited Service
(#)
  
Present Value of
Accumulated
Benefits(2)
($)
  
Payments During
Last Fiscal Year
($)
 
David E. Darling(1)
Pension Plan  --   40,661   2,227 

(1)As discussed in greater detail below, Mr. Darling’s benefit is based on his prior service with us and he is currently in payout status.
(2)A discussion of the other assumptions used in calculating the present value of accumulated benefits is set forth in Note 9 to our consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2020.
32

Although now closed to new participants, our Pension Plan covered eligible employees of our company and participating subsidiaries. Our Pension Plan was closed to new participants and frozen in 2010 and therefore each of our named executives who is currently employed by the company and its participating subsidiaries has the opportunity to participate in our defined contribution plan, the 401(k) Savings Plan.
We only have one named executive who is still covered by the Pension Plan. Mr. Darling, who most recently joined the company in March 2018, was previously employed by us from 1983 to 1996. During that previous employment, he accrued benefits under the Pension Plan, which are now being paid out to him in accordance with his prior benefit election (50% joint and contingent annuity). He will not accrue any additional benefits for his current service given that the Pension Plan is now frozen.
FISCAL 2020 NON-QUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION
Although we sponsor a Supplemental Savings Plan (“SSP”), which provides executive officers and certain other designated participants who earn over the qualified 401(k) plan limits with compensation deferral opportunities, none of our named executives have participated in this plan.
POTENTIAL PAYMENTS UPON TERMINATION OR CHANGE OF CONTROL
The following information and table set forth the amount of payments to each of our named executives that would be made in the event of the named executive’s death or disability, retirement, termination by the company without cause or by the named executive with good reason, and termination following a change in control. The table also sets forth the amount of payments to each of our named executives in the event of a change of control without a termination of employment.
During 2020, we had nochange in control agreements with all four of our named executives, which are described below as our “legacy change of control agreements,” and employment agreements with two of our named executives (Messrs. Kneen and Rubio), described below as our “legacy employment agreements.” While the termination and/or change of control benefits provided to our executives under these legacy arrangements are summarized below, each of these arrangements is described in detail in the CD&A under “Compensation Components.”
All of these agreements have been superseded by a combined severance and change of control agreement approved by our board on March 9, 2021 and entered into with each of our named executives, which are described in the CD&A – Compensation Components subsection entitled, “Fiscal 2021 Consolidation of Employment-Related Agreements.”
Assumptions and General Principles. The following assumptions and general principles apply with respect to the following table and any termination of employment of a named executive.
The amounts shown in the table assume that the date of termination of employment of each named executive was December 31, 2020. Accordingly, the table reflects amounts payable to our named executives as of December 31, 2020 and includes estimates of amounts that would be paid to the named executive upon the occurrence of a termination or change in control. The actual amounts that would be paid to a named executive can only be determined at the time of the termination or change in control.
If a named executive is employed on December 31 of a given year, that executive will generally be entitled to receive an annual cash bonus for that year under our short-term cash incentive plan. Even if a named executive resigns or is terminated with cause at the end of the fiscal year, the executive may receive an incentive bonus, because the executive had been employed for the entire fiscal year. Under these scenarios, this payment is not a severance or termination payment, but is a payment for services provided over the course of the year, and therefore is included in the table but not as a termination-related benefit. The officer would not receive a pro rata bonus payment under these circumstances if employment terminated prior to the end of the year.
33

A named executive will be entitled to receive all amounts accrued and vested under our retirement and savings programs including any pension plans and deferred compensation plans in which the named executive participates. These amounts will be determined and paid in accordance with the applicable plan, and benefits payable under the non-qualified plans in which the named executives participate are also reflected in the table. Qualified retirement plan benefits payable under our Retirement Plan are not included.
Death and Disability. Upon a named executive’s death or termination due to disability:
A named executive (or, if applicable, his estate) will receive a pro rata STI payout for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, based upon actual performance as measured against the performance criteria in effect for such year, his target opportunity, and the pro rata salary he earned during the year.
For each executive officer, the vesting of any unvested portion of his outstanding equity awards will accelerate.
Termination without Cause or with Good Reason. Upon termination of a named executive by the company owned vessels operatingwithout “cause” or by the executive with “good reason” (as those terms are defined in Nigeria and the DTDW owned vesselapplicable agreement):
The compensation committee may elect to pay the named executive a pro rata STI payout for the fiscal year in which termination occurs, based upon actual performance as measured against the performance criteria in effect for such year, his target opportunity, and the pro rata salary he earned during the year.
Under his legacy employment agreement, Mr. Kneen would be entitled to receive (1) severance equal to two years’ base salary plus the value of 12 months’ COBRA coverage, to be paid in a lump sum within 60 days of termination, and (2) accelerated vesting of his legacy GulfMark equity awards and his initial equity grant, all of which would be contingent upon his execution of a release and subject to his compliance with certain post-employment restrictive covenants.
Under his legacy employment agreement, Mr. Rubio would be entitled to receive accelerated vesting for one of the two initial equity grants he received, contingent upon his execution of a release and subject to his compliance with certain post-employment restrictive covenants.
All Other Terminations (outside of a change of control). Generally, a named executive is not entitled to receive any form of severance payments or benefits upon his voluntary decision to terminate employment with the company or upon termination for cause.
Change of Control.As noted previously, each of our named executives was not employed.  Atparty to a legacy change of control agreement at the beginningend of 2020 we had expected that wefiscal 2020. For each of the two officers who was party to a legacy employment agreement, in the event of a change of control, the terms of his change of control agreement would supersede his legacy employment agreement.
In the event of a change of control (as defined in the applicable plan or agreement), each named executive would be operating numerous vesselsentitled to receive certain employment protections during the two-year period following the consummation of a change of control. If, during the two-year protected period, the executive were terminated by the company without “cause” or terminated his employment with “good reason,” then he would be entitled to certain payments and benefits. Specifically, the executive would be entitled to receive, among other benefits:
a cash severance payment equal to a specific multiple (two times for the CEO, one-and-a-half times for any executive vice president, and one time for all other officers) of the sum of (a) his base salary in effect at the time of termination and (b) his target bonus;
34

a pro-rata STI payout for the fiscal year in which the termination occurred;
a cash payment equal to any unpaid bonus with respect to a completed fiscal year as calculated by the agreement;
reimbursement for the cost of insurance and welfare benefits for a specified number of months (24 months for the CEO, 18 months for any executive vice president, and 12 months for all other officers) following termination of employment; and
outplacement assistance, not to exceed $25,000.
The legacy change of control agreement did not provide for any tax gross-ups for excise taxes that may be triggered under Sections 280G and 4999 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. However, the executive would be entitled to receive the “best net” treatment, which means that if the total of all change of control payments due him exceeds the threshold that would trigger the imposition of excise taxes, the executive would either (1) receive all payments and benefits due him and be responsible for paying all such taxes or (2) have his payments and benefits reduced such that imposition of the excise taxes is no longer triggered, depending on which method provides him the better after-tax result.
Estimated Payments on Termination or Change in Nigeria, butControl
Event
 
Mr. Kneen
  
Mr. Rubio
  
Mr. Darling
  
Mr. Hudson
 
Death or Disability
                
Accelerated vesting of stock options(1)
 $746,055  $--  $--  $-- 
Accelerated vesting of RSUs(2)
 $1,572,705  $389,845  $509,172  $289,950 
Subtotal Termination-Related Benefits
 $2,318,760  $389,845  $509,172  $289,950 
Annual incentive for full fiscal year $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Total
 $2,718,760  $543,845  $663,172  $443,950 
Termination without Cause or with Good Reason
                
Accelerated vesting of RSUs(3)
 $296,309  $53,473  $--  $-- 
Cash severance payment(4)
 $1,023,239  $--  $--  $-- 
Subtotal Termination-Related Benefits
 $1,319,548  $53,473  $--  $-- 
Annual incentive for full fiscal year $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Total
 $1,719,548  $207,473  $154,000  $154,000 
All Other Terminations (outside of Change in Control)
                
Annual incentive for full fiscal year $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Total
 $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Change in Control (no termination)
                
Annual incentive for full fiscal year $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Total
 $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Change in Control with Termination
                
Accelerated vesting of stock options(1)
 $746,055  $--  $--  $-- 
Accelerated vesting of RSUs(2)
 $1,572,705  $389,845  $509,172  $289,950 
Cash severance payment(5)
 $2,000,000  $467,500  $467,500  $467,500 
Additional benefits(6)
 $71,478  $41,291  $40,271  $48,239 
Subtotal Termination-Related Benefits
 $4,390,238  $898,636  $1,016,943  $805,689 
Annual incentive for full fiscal year $400,000  $154,000  $154,000  $154,000 
Total
 $4,790,238  $1,052,636  $1,170,943  $959,689 

(1)Reflects the difference between the closing price of a share of our common stock on December 31, 2020 and the per-share exercise price of the unvested options, multiplied by the number of options for which vesting would be accelerated.
35

(2)Assumes target performance on any performance-based RSUs.
(3)Under his legacy employment agreement, each of Messrs. Kneen and Rubio would be entitled to acceleration of a limited number of his unvested RSUs as detailed above.
(4)Under his legacy employment agreement, Mr. Kneen would be entitled to cash severance consisting of 24 months of base salary plus 12 months of COBRA premiums.
(5)Under the legacy change of control agreements, cash severance would be payable in the amount of two times base salary and target bonus for Mr. Kneen and one times base salary and target bonus for each of Messrs. Rubio, Darling, and Hudson.
(6)Includes the value of COBRA continuation coverage for specified number of months (24 for Mr. Kneen and 12 for each of Messrs. Rubio, Darling, and Hudson), based on the officer’s current benefit elections, plus the maximum outplacement assistance ($25,000), as provided in the legacy change of control agreements.
PAY RATIO DISCLOSURE
As required by SEC rules, we determined the second quarterratio of 2020 the COVID-19 pandemicannual total compensation of Mr. Kneen, our current president and resulting oil price reduction caused our primary customer in Nigeria to eliminate all planned operations for 2020.  As a result, the near-term cash flow projections indicate that DTDW does not have sufficient funds to meet its obligations to us orCEO, relative to the holderannual total compensation of its long-term debt.  Therefore, we recorded affiliate credit loss impairment expense totaling $12.1 million.  In addition, based on our analysis we determined that DTDW will be unable to pay its debt obligation andmedian employee. For the debt will not be satisfied by liquidating the vessel and, as a result, we recorded additional impairment expense of $2.0 million for our expected share of the obligation guarantee during thefiscal year ended December 31, 2020. 

Refer to Note 5 of Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K2020:

the annual total compensation paid to the individual who was identified as the median employee of our company and its consolidated subsidiaries (other than our CEO), was $28,408;
the annual total compensation of our CEO (as reported in the Summary Compensation Table) was $2,923,216; and
based on this information, the ratio of the annual total compensation of our CEO to the median employee’s annual total compensation is 103 to 1.
In determining our median employee, we examined annual base cash compensation for further details on the Nigerian joint venture.

International Labour Organization’s Maritime Labour Convention

The International Labour Organization's Maritime Labour Convention, 2006 (the MLC) mandates globally, among other things, seafarer living and working conditions (accommodations, wages, conditions of employment, health and other benefits) aboard ships that are engaged in commercial activities.  Since its initial entry into force on August 20, 2013, 90 countries have now ratified the MLC.

We maintain certification of our vessels to MLC requirements, perform maintenance and repairs at shipyards, and make port calls during ocean voyages in accordance with the MLC based on the dates of enforcement by countries in which we operate. Additionally, where possible, we continue to work with identified flag states to seek substantial equivalencies to comparable national and industry laws that meet the intent of the MLC and allow us to standardize operational protocols among our fleet.

Government Regulation

We are subject to various U.S. federal, state and local statutes and regulations governing the ownership, operation and maintenance of our vessels. Our U.S. flagged vessels are subject to the jurisdiction of the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and the U.S. Maritime Administration. We are also subject to international laws and conventions and the laws of international jurisdictions where we operate.

Under the citizenship provisions of the Jones Act, we would not be permitted to engage in the U.S. coastwise trade if more than 25% of our outstanding stock were owned by non-U.S. Citizens as defined by the Jones Act. For a company engaged in the U.S. coastwise trade to be deemed a U.S. citizen: (i) it must be organized under the laws of the United States or of a state, territory or possession thereof, (ii) each of the chief executive officer and the chairman of the board of directors of such corporation must be a U.S. citizen, (iii) no more than a minority of the number of directors of such corporation necessary to constitute a quorum for the transaction of business can be non-U.S. Citizens and (iv) at least 75% of the interest in such corporation must be owned by U.S. citizens. We have a dual stock certificate system to protect against non-U.S. Citizens owning more than 25% of our common stock. In addition, our charter provides us with certain remedies with respect to any transfer or purported transfer of shares of our common stock that would result in the ownership by non-U.S. Citizens of more than 24% of our common stock.  Based on the latest information available to us, less than 24% of our outstanding common stock was owned by non-U.S. Citizensall employees as of December 31, 2020.

8

Our vessel operations in the U.S. Gulf of Mexico (GOM) are considered to be coastwise trade. U.S. law requires that vessels engaged in the U.S. coastwise trade must be built in the U.S. and registered under U.S. flag. In addition, once a U.S. built vessel is registered under a non-U.S. flag, it cannot thereafter engage in U.S. coastwise trade. Therefore, our non-U.S. flagged vessels must operate outside of the U.S. coastwise trade zone. Of the total 149 active vessels that we owned or operated at December 31, 2020, 136 vessels were registered under flags other than the United States and 13 vessels were registered under the U.S. flag.

All of our offshore vessels are subject to either United States or international safety and classification standards or sometimes both. Deepwater PSVs, deepwater AHTS vessels, towing-supply vessels, and crew boats are required to undergo periodic inspections generally twice within every five year period pursuant to U.S. Coast Guard regulations. Vessels registered under flags other than the United States are subject to similar regulations and are governed by the laws of the applicable international jurisdictions and the rules and requirements of various classification societies, such as the American Bureau of Shipping.

We comply with the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code, an amendment to the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS) Convention (1974/1988), and further mandated in the Maritime Transportation and Security Act of 2002 to align United States regulations with those of the ISPS Code and SOLAS. Under the ISPS Code, we perform worldwide security assessments, risk analyses, and develops vessel and required port facility security plans to enhance safe and secure vessel and facility operations. Additionally, we have developed security annexes for those U.S. flag vessels that transit or work in waters designated as high risk by the U.S. Coast Guard pursuant to the latest revision of Maritime Security Directive 104-6.

Occupational Safety and Health Compliance

In the U.S., we are subject to the Occupational Safety and Health Act (OSHA) and other similar laws and regulations, which establish workplace standards for the protection of the health and safety of employees, including the implementation of hazard communications programs designed to inform employees about hazardous substances in the workplace, potential harmful effects of these substances, and appropriate control measures.

As described above, certain of the international jurisdictions in which we operate, including the U.K., have ratified the MLC, which establishes minimum requirements for working conditions of seafarers, including conditions of employment, hours of work and rest, grievance and complaints procedures, accommodations, recreational facilities, food and catering, health protection, medical care, welfare and social security protection. Although the U.S. is not a party to the MLC, U.S. flag vessels operating internationally must comply with the MLC when calling on a port in a country that is a party to the MLC.

Environmental Compliance

During the ordinary course of business, our operations are subject to a wide variety of environmental laws and regulations that govern the discharge of oil and pollutants into navigable waters. Violations of these laws may result in civil and criminal penalties, fines, injunctions and other sanctions. Compliance with the existing governmental regulations that have been enacted or adopted regulating the discharge of materials into the environment, or otherwise relating to the protection of the environment has not had, nor is expected to have, a material effect on us. Environmental laws and regulations are subject to change, however, and may impose increasingly strict requirements, and, as such, we cannot estimate the ultimate cost of complying with such potential changes to environmental laws and regulations. Existing U.S. environmental laws and regulations to which we are subject include, but are not limited to:

the Clean Air Act, which restricts the emission of air pollutants from many sources and imposes various preconstruction, operational, monitoring and reporting requirements, and that the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency has relied upon as the authority for adopting climate change regulatory initiatives relating to greenhouse gas emissions;

the Clean Water Act, which regulates discharges of pollutants from facilities to state and federal waters and establishes the extent to which waterways are subject to federal jurisdiction and rulemaking as protected waters of the U.S.;

9

the Oil Pollution Act of 1990, which subjects owners and operators of vessels, onshore facilities, and pipelines, as well as lessees or permittees of areas in which offshore facilities are located, to liability for removal costs and damages arising from an oil spill in waters of the United States;

the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act of 1980, which imposes liability on generators, transporters, and arrangers of hazardous substances at sites where hazardous substance releases have occurred or are threatening to occur; and

U.S. Department of the Interior regulations, which govern oil and natural gas operations on federal lands and waters and impose obligations for establishing financial assurances for decommissioning activities, liabilities for pollution cleanup costs resulting from operations, and potential liabilities for pollution damages.

In the U.S. and abroad, we are subject to the International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL), an international convention that imposes environmental standards on the shipping industry relating to oil spills, management of garbage, the handling of certain substances, sewage and air emissions.

We are also involved in various legal proceedings that relate to asbestos and other environmental matters. The amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these proceedings is not expected to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. We are proactive in establishing policies and operating procedures for safeguarding the environment against any hazardous materials aboard our vessels and at shore-based locations.

Whenever possible, hazardous materials are maintained or transferred in confined areas in an attempt to ensure containment, if accidents were to occur. In addition, we have established operating policies that are intended to increase awareness of actions that may harm the environment, including being committed to responsible ship recycling in accordance with the Hong Kong convention and European Ship Recycling Regulation.

10

Safety

We are dedicated to ensuring the safety of our operations for our employees, our customers and any personnel associated with our operations. Tidewater’s principal operations occur in offshore waters where the workplace environment presents many safety challenges. Management communicates frequently with company personnel to promote safety and instill safe work habits through the use of company media directed at, and regular training of, both our seamen and shore-based personnel. We dedicate personnel and resources to ensure safe operations and regulatory compliance. Our Director of Health, Safety, Environment and Security (HSES) Management is involved in numerous proactive efforts to prevent accidents and injuries from occurring. The HSES Director also reviews all incidents that occur, focusing on lessons that can be learned from such incidents and opportunities to incorporate such lessons into our on-going safety-related training. In addition, we employ safety personnel to be responsible for administering our safety programs and fostering our safety culture. Our position is that each of our employees is a safety supervisor with the authority and the obligation to stop any operation that they deem to be unsafe.

Risk Management

The operation of any marine vessel involves an inherent risk of marine losses (including physical damage to the vessel) attributable to adverse sea and weather conditions, mechanical failure, and collisions. In addition, the nature of our operations exposes us to the potential risks of damage to and loss of drilling rigs and production facilities, hostile activities attributable to war, sabotage, piracy and terrorism, as well as business interruption due to political action or inaction, including nationalization of assets by foreign governments. Any such event may lead to a reduction in revenues or increased costs. Our vessels are generally insured for their estimated market value against damage or loss, including war, acts of terrorism, and pollution risks, but we do not directly or fully insure for business interruption. We also carry workers’ compensation, maritime employer’s liability, director and officer liability, general liability (including third party pollution) and other insurance customary in the industry.

The continued threat of terrorist activity and other acts of war or hostility have significantly increased the risk of political, economic and social instability in some of the geographic areas in which we operate. It is possible that further acts of terrorism may be directed against the United States domestically or abroad, and such acts of terrorism could be directed against properties and personnel of U.S. headquartered companies such as ours. The resulting economic, political and social uncertainties, including the potential for future terrorist acts and war, could cause the premiums charged for the insurance coverage to increase. We currently maintain war risk coverage on our entire fleet.

We seek to secure appropriate insurance coverage at competitive rates, in part, by maintaining self-insurance up to certain individual and aggregate loss limits. We carefully monitor claims and actively participate in claims estimates and adjustments. Estimated costs of self-insured claims, which include estimates for incurred but unreported claims, are accrued as liabilities on our balance sheet.

We believe that our insurance coverage is adequate. We have not experienced a loss in excess of insurance policy limits; however, there is no assurance that our liability coverage will be adequate to cover claims that may arise. While we believe that we should be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates considered commercially acceptable, we cannot guarantee that such insurance will continue to be available at commercially acceptable rates given the markets in which we operate. For further discussion of our risks see “Risk Factors” in Item 1A of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Environmental, Socialdate, Tidewater and Governance Factors

We are committed to transparently reporting on environmental, social and governance (ESG) factors that may be relevant to Tidewater. There has been an increasing amount of ESG disclosure by publicly-listed companies in recent years and we expect this trend to continue. Increasing ESG disclosure may be driven by investor expectations, SEC requirements, regulation or in response to stakeholder concerns. We use internationally-recognized methods and reporting standards to measure and disclose our performance in relation to ESG factors. We have disclosed ESG-related information on our website and from 2021 will expand our disclosures in a formal ESG report, aligned with the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) Marine Transportation standard, additionally taking into account recommendations provided by the Taskforce on Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).  

Seasonality

Our global vessel fleet generally has its highest utilization rates in the warmer months when the weather is more favorable for offshore exploration, field development and construction work in the oil and gas industry. Hurricanes, cyclones, the monsoon season, and other severe weather can negatively or positively impact vessel operations. In particular, our Gulf of Mexico (GOM) operations can be impacted by the Atlantic hurricane season from the months of June through November, when offshore exploration, field development and construction work tend to slow or halt in an effort to mitigate potential losses and damage that may occur to the offshore oil and gas infrastructure should a hurricane enter the area. However, demand for offshore marine vessels typically increases in the GOM in connection with repair and remediation work that follows any hurricane damage to offshore crude oil and natural gas infrastructure. Our vessels that operate offshore in India Southeast Asia and the Western Pacific are impacted by the monsoon season, which occursconsolidated subsidiaries had over 5,400 employees across the region from November to April. Vessels that operate in the North Sea can be impacted by a seasonal slowdown in the winter months, generally from November to March. Although hurricanes, cyclones, monsoons and other severe weather can have a seasonal impact on operations, our business volume is more dependent on crude oil and natural gas pricing, global supply of crude oil and natural gas, and demand for our offshore support vessels and other services than on any seasonal variation.

11

Human Capital Management

Employees and Labor Relations:

 As of January 1, 2021, we employ approximately 5,400 employees worldwide. Our global footprint hasglobe, with over 90% of our fleet working internationally in more than 30 countries. WeTo aid in maintaining a uniformity of comparison, we annualized the compensation for full-time workers who joined us after the first of the year and converted all amounts paid in foreign currencies to U.S. dollars based on the exchange ratio for each such currency reported on the same day.

A significant portion of our workforce consists of individuals who are not a party to any union contract in the United Statesemployed by us directly, but through several subsidiaries are subject to union agreements covering local nationals in several countries other than the United States, most heavily in the North Sea with UK and Norwegian mariners.

Culture and Engagement

Company culture is a key focus for the Chief Human Resource Officer (CHRO) and the rest of the senior leadership. Tidewater’s culture is promoted through its “7 Cs”:

Capability

Collaboration

Commitment

Communication

Compassion

Compliance

Courage

Our focus is on creating an environment where our colleagues feel respected, valued, and can contribute to their fullest potential. We leverage technology to promote online collaborative workspaces to bring our colleagues together across multiple time zones and geographies and create a global sense of community.  In fiscal year 2020, the COVID-19 pandemic had a significant impact on our human capital management. A large majority of our onshore workforce has worked remotely beginning in the second quarter of 2020 and, for those who continue torather work on site, we instituted safety protocols and procedures.

In October 2019, we conducted a global shore-based employee satisfaction survey using a leading outside firm that specializes in employee engagement. We had an above-average completion rate and the majority of respondents indicated satisfaction in their jobs. We see our positive employee engagement evidenced by our employee retention, with most of the employees who responded to our survey having been with us for at least 10 years. We plan to conduct this type of survey on a periodic basis and will use the information to work towards continuously improving our employees’ environment.

Health and Safety

We maintain a safety culture grounded on the premise of eliminating workplace incidents, risks and hazards. We are dedicated to ensuring the safety of our operations for our employees, our customers and any personnel associated with our operations. Our principal operations occur in offshore waters where the workplace environment presents many safety challenges. Management communicates frequently with company personnel to promote safety and instill safe work habits through the use of company media directed at, and regular training of, both our mariners and shore-based personnel. We dedicate personnel and resources to ensure safe operations and regulatory compliance. In addition, we employ safety personnel who are responsible for administering our safety programs and fostering our safety culture and monitoring the results of our safety programs and initiatives. Our position is that each of our employees is a safety supervisor with the authority and the obligation to stop any operation that they deem to be unsafe.

By establishing practical safeguards against all identified risks, we  take a consistent and proactive approach to minimizing the number of accidents, incidents and hazardous occurrences. We utilize both leading and lagging indicators to monitor the performance of our health and safety programs. Lagging indicators include the Total Recordable Incident Rate (TRIR) and the Lost Time Incident Rate (LTIR) based upon the number of incidents per one million working hours. Leading indicators include reporting and closure of all near miss events and Health, Safety and Environmental (HSE) training activities. In calendar year 2020, we achieved our lowest recordable incident rate on record, with a TRIR of 0.34, a LTIR of 0.0 and no work-related fatalities.

In 2020, we experienced significant challenges resulting from COVID-19. Revised safety protocols were immediately implemented and management in each area of operation ensured constant compliance with local government, customer and other restrictions and guidelines to help mitigate risk of exposure of our employees and contractors.

Inclusion and Diversity

We embrace the diversity of our teamas crew members stakeholders and customers, including their unique backgrounds, experiences, thoughts and talents. Everyone is valued and appreciated for their distinct contributions to the growth and sustainability of our business. We strive to cultivate a culture and vision that supports and enhances our ability to recruit, develop and retain diverse talent at every level.We are an equal opportunity employer, with all qualified applicants receiving consideration for employment without regard to race, color, religion, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, national origin, disability or protected veteran status. We comply with all applicable employment, labor and immigration requirements, and require all of our personnel to cooperate with all compliance efforts. We have a policy of continuous improvement; opportunities to further connect and support collaboration between our diverse employee base continue to be identified and addressed with further investments in training, tools and systems.

We are committed to racial equality and fostering a culture of diversity and inclusion throughout our organization, a commitment that both starts with, and is reflected in, our board of directors. We have made diversity and inclusion an important part of our hiring and retention efforts. Our CHRO has primary responsibility for our human capital management strategy, including attracting, developing, engaging and retaining those talented employees.  The CHRO is also responsible for the design of employee compensation and benefits programs in addition to promoting diversity and inclusion throughout the Company.

Available Information

We make available free of charge, on or through our website (www.tdw.com), our Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and other filings pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, (Exchange Act) and amendments to such filings, as soon as reasonably practicable after each is electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC). The SEC maintains a website that contains our reports, proxy and information statements, and our other SEC filings. The address of the SEC’s website is www.sec.gov. Information appearing on our website is not part of any report that we file with the SEC.

We have adopted a Code of Business Conduct and Ethics (Code), which is applicable to our directors, chief executive officer, chief financial officer, principal accounting officer, and other officers and employees on matters of business conduct and ethics, including compliance standards and procedures. The Code is publicly available on our website at www.tdw.com. We will make timely disclosure by a Current Report on Form 8-K and on our website of any change to, or waiver from, the Code for our chief executive officer, chief financial officer and principal accounting officer. Any changes or waivers to the Code will be maintained on our website for at least 12 months. A copy of the Code is also available in print to any stockholder upon written request addressed to Tidewater Inc., 6002 Rogerdale Road, Suite 600, Houston, Texas, 77072.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

The following discussion of risk factors contains forward-looking statements. These risk factors may be important to understanding other statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following information should be read in conjunction with Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes in Part II, Item 8, “Financial Statements and Supplementary Data” of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Our business, financial condition and operating results can be affected by a number of factors, whether currently known or unknown, including but not limited to those described below, any one or more of which could, directly or indirectly, cause our actual financial condition and operating results to vary materially from those anticipated, projected or assumed in the forward-looking statements. Any of these factors, in whole or in part, could materially and adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition, results of operations, stock price and cash flows. These could also be affected by additional factors that apply to all companies generally which are not specifically mentioned below.

Summary of Risk Factors

Below is a summary of some of the principal risks and uncertainties that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and results of operations. You should read this summary together with the more detailed description of each risk factor contained below.

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

The COVID-19 pandemic may continue to have a material negative impact on our operations and business. 

Recent disruptions in the global market for oil and natural gas, which have led to market oversupply and depressed commodity prices, have adversely affected our operations and may, in the future, materially disrupt our operations and adversely impact our business and financial results. 

A substantial or an extended decline in oil and natural gas prices could result in lower capital spending by our customers.

We derive a significant amount of revenue from a relatively small number of customers.

12

The high level of competition on the offshore marine service industry could negatively impact pricing for our services.

The rise in production of unconventional crude oil and natural gas resources could increase supply without a commensurate growth in demand which would negatively impact oil and natural gas prices.

An increase in vessel supply without a corresponding increase in the working offshore rig count could exacerbate the industry’s currently oversupplied condition.

Our insurance coverage and contractual indemnity protections may not be sufficient to protect us under all circumstances or against all risks.

Maintaining our current fleet and acquiring vessels required for additional future growth require significant capital.

We may not be able to renew or replace expiring contracts for our vessels.

We may record additional losses or impairment charges related to our vessels.

Cybersecurity attacks on any of our facilities, or those of third parties, may result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Uncertain economic conditions may lead our customers to postpone capital spending or jeopardize our customers’ or other counterparties’ ability to perform their obligations.

Risks Relating to Our Indebtedness

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service and other obligations.

Restrictive debt covenants may restrict our ability to raise capital and pursue our business strategies.

The amount of our debt could have significant consequences for our operations and future prospects.

We may not be able to obtain debt financing if and when needed with favorable terms, if at all.

Risks Relating to Our International and Foreign Operations

We operate throughout the world and are exposed to risks inherent in doing business in countries other than the U.S.

Global or regional public health crises and other catastrophic events could reduce economic activity resulting in lower commodity prices and could affect our crew rotations and entry into ports.

13

We may have disruptions or disagreements with our foreign joint venture partners, which could lead to an unwinding of the joint venture.

Our international operations expose us to currency devaluation and fluctuation risk.

With our extensive international operations, we are subject to certain compliance risks under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act or similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

Risks Relating to Governmental Regulation

There may be changes to complex and developing laws and regulations to which we are subject that would increase our cost of compliance and operational risk.

Changes in U.S. and international tax laws and policies could adversely affect our financial results.

Any changes in environmental regulations, including climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions, could increase the cost of energy and future production of oil and natural gas.

Increasing attention to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters may impact our business and some institutional investors may be discouraged from investing in the industry in which we operate.

Risks Relating to Our Employees

We may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining executives and other key personnel.

We may be subject to additional unionization efforts, new collective bargaining agreements or work stoppages.

Certain of our employees are covered by both state and federal laws that may subject us to job-related claims.

Risks Relating to Our Securities

Our common stock is subject to restriction on foreign ownership by non-U.S. Citizen stockholders.

The market price of our securities is subject to volatility.

Because we currently have no plans to pay cash dividends or other distributions on our common stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited, which could make us unable to fund our capital requirements.

Anti-takeover provisions and limitations on foreign ownership in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change of control.

14

Risk Factors

Risks Relating to the COVID-19 Pandemic

The COVID-19 pandemic has adversely affected and may, in the future, have a material negative impact on our operations and business. 

As discussed above in Item 1, it became evident that a novel coronavirus originating in Asia (COVID-19) could become a pandemic with worldwide reach.  By mid-March, when the World Health Organization declared the outbreak to be a pandemic (the COVID-19 pandemic”, much of the industrialized world had taken severe measures to lessen its impact.  The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic has created significant volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption.

The spread of COVID-19 to one or more of our locations, including our vessels, could significantly impact our operations.  While we have implemented various protocols for both onshore and offshore personnel in efforts to limit the impact of COVID-19, there is no assurance that those efforts will be fully successful. The spread of COVID-19 to our onshore workforce could prevent us from supporting our offshore operations, we may experience reduced productivity as our onshore personnel works remotely, and any spread to our key management personnel may disrupt our business. Any outbreak on our vessels may result in the vessel, or some or all of a vessel crew, being quarantined and therefore impede the vessel’s abilityprovide services to generate revenue.  We have experienced challenges in connection with our offshore crew changes due to health and travel restrictions related to COVID-19, and those challenges and/or restrictions may continue or worsen despite our efforts at mitigating them.  To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our operations and business, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks set forth in our SEC filings, such as those relating to our financial performance and debt obligations.

The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic is unknown and is rapidly evolving. The extent to which it impacts our business and operations and ability to preserve our liquidity will depend on the severity, location, and duration of the effects and spread of the pandemic itself, the actions undertaken by national, regional, and local governments and health officials to contain the virus or treat its effects, and how quickly and to what extent economic conditions improve and normal business and operating conditions resume.  As we cannot predict the duration or scope of this pandemic, the anticipated negative financial impact to our operating results cannot be reasonably estimated but could be both material and long-lasting. Additionally, the impact of COVID-19, and the volatile regional and global economic conditions stemming from the pandemic, may also precipitate or exacerbate other risks discussed in this Item 1A- Risk Factors and elsewhere in this report, any of which could have a material effect on us.

Recent disruptions in the global market for oil and natural gas, which have led to market oversupply and depressed commodity prices, have adversely affected our operations and may, in the future, materially disrupt our operations and adversely impact our business and financial results. 

With respect to our particular sector, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in a much lower demand for oil as national, regional, and local governments impose travel restrictions, border closings, restrictions on public gatherings, stay at home orders, and limitations on business operations in order to contain its spread.  During this same time period, oil-producing countries have struggled to reach consensus on worldwide production levels, resulting in both a market oversupply of oil and a precipitous fall in oil prices.

Combined, these conditions have adversely affected our operations and business beginning with the latter part of the first fiscal quarter of 2020 and we do expect our operations and business in 2021 to be negatively impacted. The reduction in demand for hydrocarbons together with an unprecedented decline in the price of oil has resulted in our primary customers, the oil and gas companies, making material reductions to their planned spending on offshore projects, compounding the effect of the virus on offshore operations. Further, these conditions, separately or together, may continue to impact the demand for our services, the utilization and/or rates we can achieve for our assets and services, and the outlook for our industry in general. Although, as of the date of this filing, oil-producing countries have reached a tentative agreement regarding future output, oil prices will remain depressed as long as the market is oversupplied and demand will remain depressed until global economic conditions improve.

15

Risks Relating to Our Business and Industry

The prices for oil and natural gas affect the level of capital spending by our customers. A substantial or an extended decline in oil and natural gas prices could result in lower capital spending by our customers.

Demand for our services depends substantially upon the level of activity in the oil and natural gas industry and, in particular, the willingness of oil and natural gas companies to make capital expenditures on exploration, drilling and production operations. Oil and natural gas prices and market expectations of potential changes in these prices significantly affect this level of activity. Prices for crude oil and natural gas are highly volatile and extremely sensitive to the respective supply/demand relationship for crude oil and natural gas. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 7 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Many factors affect the supply of and demand for crude oil and natural gas and, therefore, influence prices of these commodities, including:

domestic and foreign supply of oil and natural gas, including increased availability of non-traditional energy resources such as shale oil and natural gas;

prices, and expectations about future prices, of oil and natural gas;

domestic and worldwide economic conditions, and the resulting global demand for oil and natural gas;

the price and quantity of imports of foreign oil and natural gas including the ability of OPEC to set and maintain production levels for oil, and decisions by OPEC to change production levels;

sanctions imposed by the U.S., the European Union (E.U.), or other governments against oil producing countries;

the cost of exploring for, developing, producing and delivering oil and natural gas;

the expected rates of decline in production from existing and prospective wells and the discovery rates of new oil and natural gas reserves;

federal, state and local regulation relating to (i) exploration and drilling activities, (ii) equipment, material, supplies or services that we furnish, (iii) oil and natural gas exports and (iv) environmental or energy security matters;

public pressure on, and legislative and regulatory interest within, federal, state and local governments to stop, significantly limit or regulate oil or natural gas production;

weather conditions, natural disasters, and global or regional public health crises and other catastrophic events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic that began in early 2020;

incidents resulting from operating hazards inherent in offshore drilling, such as oil spills;

political, military and economic instability and social unrest in oil and natural gas producing countries, including the impact of armed hostilities involving one or more oil producing nations;

advances in exploration, development and production technologies or in technologies affecting energy consumption;

the price and availability of, and public sentiment regarding, alternative fuel and energy sources;

uncertainty in capital and commodities markets; and

domestic and foreign tax policies, including those regarding tariffs and duties.

16

A prolonged material downturn in crude oil and natural gas prices and/or perceptions of long-term lower commodity prices can negatively impact the development plans of exploration and production (E&P) companies and result in a significant decline in demand for offshore support services resulting in project modifications, delays or cancellations, general business disruptions, and delays in payment of, or nonpayment of, amounts that are owed to us. Moreover, declining or continuing depressed oil and natural gas prices may result in negative pressures on:

our customer’s capital spending and spending on our services;

our charter rates and/or utilization rates;

our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition;

the fair market value of our vessels;

our ability to refinance, maintain or increase our borrowing capacity;

our ability to obtain additional capital to finance our business and make acquisitions or capital expenditures, and the cost of that capital; and

the collectability of our receivables.

Moreover, higher commodity prices will not necessarily translate into increased demand for offshore support services or sustained higher pricing for offshore support vessel services, in part because customer demand is often driven by capital expenditure programs that are more focused on future commodity price expectations and not solely on current prices. Additionally, increased commodity demand may in the future be satisfied by land-based energy resource production and any increased demand for offshore support vessel services can be more than offset by an increased supply of offshore support vessels resulting from the construction of additional offshore support vessels.

We derive a significant amount of revenue from a relatively small number of customers.

For the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, our top five and ten largest customers accounted for a significant percentage of our total revenues. While it is normal for our customer base to change over time as our time charter contracts expire and are replaced, our results of operations, financial condition and cash flows could be materially adversely affected if one or more of these customers were to decide to interrupt or curtail their activities, in general, or their activities with us, terminate their contracts with us, fail to renew existing contracts with us, and/or refuse to award new contracts to us.

Our customer base has undergone consolidation and additional consolidation is possible.

Additional consolidation of oil and natural gas companies and other energy companies and energy services companies is possible. Consolidation reduces the number of customers for our equipment and services, and may negatively affect exploration, development and production activity as consolidated companies focus, at least initially, on increasing efficiency and reducing costs and may delay or abandon exploration activity with less promise. Such activity could adversely affect demand for our offshore services.

The high level of competition on the offshore marine service industry could negatively impact pricing for our services.

We operate in a highly competitive industry, which could depress charter and utilization rates and adversely affect our financial performance. We compete for business with our competitors on the basis of price; reputation for quality service; quality, suitability and technical capabilities of our vessels; availability of vessels; safety and efficiency; cost of mobilizing vessels from one market to a different market; and national flag preference. In addition, competition in international markets may be adversely affected by regulations requiring, among other things, local construction, flagging, ownership or control of vessels, the awarding of contracts to local contractors, the employment of local citizens and/or the purchase of supplies from local vendors.

The rise in production of unconventional crude oil and natural gas resources could increase supply without a commensurate growth in demand which would negatively impact oil and natural gas prices.

The rise in production of unconventional crude oil and natural gas resources in North America and the commissioning of a number of new large Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) export facilities around the world have contributed to an over-supplied natural gas market. Production from unconventional resources has increased as drilling efficiencies have improved, lowering the costs of extraction. There has also been a buildup of crude oil inventories in the U.S. in part due to the increased development of unconventional crude oil resources. Prolonged increases in the worldwide supply of crude oil and natural gas, whether from conventional or unconventional sources, without a commensurate growth in demand for crude oil and natural gas may continue to depress crude oil and natural gas prices. A prolonged period of low crude oil and natural gas prices would likely have a negative impact on development plans of exploration and production companies, which in turn, may result in a decrease in demand for our offshore support vessel services.

17

An increase in vessel supply without a corresponding increase in the working offshore rig count could exacerbate the industry’s currently oversupplied condition.

Over the past decade, the combination of historically high commodity prices and technological advances resulted in significant growth in deepwater exploration, field development and production. During this time, construction of offshore vessels increased significantly in order to meet projected requirements of customers and potential customers. Excess offshore support vessel capacity usually exerts downward pressure on charter day rates. Excess capacity can occur when newly constructed vessels enter the worldwide offshore support vessel market and also when vessels migrate between markets. A discussion about our vessel fleet appears in the “Vessel Utilization and Average Rates Per Segment” section of Item 7 in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

In addition, the provisions of U.S. shipping laws restricting engagement of U.S. coastwise trade to vessels controlled by U.S. citizens may from time to time be circumvented by foreign competitors that seek to engage in trade reserved for vessels controlled by U.S. citizens and otherwise qualifying for coastwise trade. A repeal, suspension or significant modification of U.S. shipping laws, or the administrative erosion of their benefits, permitting vessels that are either foreign-flagged, foreign-built, foreign-owned, foreign-controlled or foreign-operated to engage in the U.S. coastwise trade, could also result in excess vessel capacity and increased competition, especially for our vessels that operate in North America.

An increase in vessel capacity without a corresponding increase in the working offshore rig count could exacerbate the industry’s currently oversupplied condition, which may have the effect of lowering charter rates and utilization rates, which, in turn, would result in lower revenues.

Our insurance coverage and contractual indemnity protections may not be sufficient to protect us under all circumstances or against all risks.

Our operations are subject to the hazards inherent in the offshore oilfield business. These include blowouts, explosions, fires, collisions, capsizings, sinkings, groundings and severe weather conditions. Some of these events could be the result of (or exacerbated by) mechanical failure or navigation or operational errors. These hazards could result in personal injury and loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property and equipment (including to the property and equipment of third parties), pollution or environmental damage and suspension of operations, increased costs and loss of business. Damages arising from such occurrences may result in lawsuits alleging large claims, and we may incur substantial liabilities or losses as a result of these hazards.

We carry what we consider to be prudent levels of liability insurance, and our vessels are generally insured for their estimated market value against damage or loss, including war, terrorism acts and pollution risks. While we maintain insurance protection and, as further described below, seek to obtain indemnity agreements from our customers requiring the customers to hold us harmless from some of these risks, our insurance and contractual indemnity protection may not be sufficient or effective to protect us under all circumstances or against all risks. Our insurance coverages are subject to deductibles and certain exclusions. We do not directly or fully insure for business interruption. The occurrence of a significant event not fully insured or indemnified against or the failure of a customer to meet its indemnification obligations to us could have a material and adverse effect on our results of operations and financial condition. Additionally, while we believe that we should be able to maintain adequate insurance in the future at rates considered commercially acceptable, we cannot guarantee that such insurance will continue to be available at commercially acceptable rates given the markets in which we operate.

In addition, our contracts are individually negotiated, and the levels of indemnity and allocation of liabilities in them may vary from contract to contract depending on market conditions, particular customer requirements and other factors existing at the time a contract is negotiated. Additionally, the enforceability of indemnification provisions in our contracts may be limited or prohibited by applicable law or may not be enforced by courts having jurisdiction, and we could be held liable for substantial losses or damages and for fines and penalties imposed by regulatory authorities. The law with respect to the enforceability of indemnities varies from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Current or future litigation in particular jurisdictions, whether or not we are a party, may impact the interpretation and enforceability of indemnification provisions in our contracts. There can be no assurance that our contracts with our customers, suppliers and subcontractors will fully protect us against all hazards and risks inherent in our operations. There can also be no assurance that those parties with contractual obligations to indemnify us will be financially able to do so or will otherwise honor their contractual obligations.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

We may not be able to generate sufficient cash flow to meet our debt service and other obligations.

Our ability to make payments on our indebtedness and to fund our operations depends on our ability to maintain sufficient cash flows. Our ability to generate cash in the future, to a large extent, is subject to conditions in the oil and natural gas industry, including commodity prices, demand for our services and the prices we are able to charge for our services, general economic and financial conditions, competition in the markets in which we operate, the impact of legislative and regulatory actions on how we conduct our business and other factors, all of which are beyond our control.

Lower levels of offshore exploration and development activity and spending by our customers globally directly and significantly have impacted, and may continue to impact, our financial performance, financial condition and financial outlook.

18

Restrictive covenants in our Indenture and our amended and restated Troms credit agreement may restrict our ability to raise capital and pursue our business strategies.

The Indenture and the amended and restated Troms credit agreement contain certain restrictive covenants, including restrictions on the incurrence of debt and liens and our ability to make investments and restricted payments. These covenants limit our ability, among other things, to:

incur additional indebtedness or liens;

make certain investments or capital expenditures;

consolidate, merge, sell, or otherwise dispose of all or substantially all of our assets; and

pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem our stock.

The Indenture, as amended, and the amended and restated Troms credit agreement also require us to comply with certain financial covenants, including maintenance of minimum liquidity and compliance with a minimum consolidated interest coverage ratio. We may be unable to meet these financial covenants or comply with these restrictive covenants, which could result in a default under our Indenture or the amended and restated Troms credit agreement. If a default occurs and is continuing, the Trustee or noteholders holding at least 25% of the aggregate principal amount of then outstanding notes under the Indenture and the lenders under the amended and restated Troms credit agreement may elect to declare all borrowings thereunder outstanding, together with accrued interest and other fees, to be immediately due and payable. If we are unable to repay our indebtedness when due or declared due, the noteholders and the lenders under the amended and restated Troms credit agreement will also have the right to foreclose on the collateral pledged to them, including the vessels, to secure the indebtedness. If such indebtedness were to be accelerated, our assets may not be sufficient to repay in full our secured indebtedness. Please refer to Note (4) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional information on the Indenture and amended and restated Troms credit agreement.

As a result of the restrictive covenants under the Indenture and the amended and restated Troms credit agreement, we may be prevented from taking advantage of business opportunities. In addition, the restrictions contained in the Indenture and the amended and restated Troms credit agreement, including a substantial make whole premium applicable to voluntary prepayment of obligations under the Indenture, may also limit our ability to plan for or react to market conditions, meet capital needs or otherwise restrict our activities or business plans and adversely affect our ability to finance our operations, refinance, enter into acquisitions, execute our business strategy, make capital expenditures, effectively compete with companies that are not similarly restricted or engage in other business activities that would be in our interest. In the future, we may also incur additional debt obligations that might subject us to additional and different restrictive covenants that could further affect our financial and operational flexibility. We cannot assure you that we will be granted waivers or amendments to these agreements if requested to obtain financial or operational flexibility or if for any reason we are unable to comply with these agreements, or that we will be able to refinance our debt on acceptable terms or at all.

The amount of our debt, including secured debt, and the restrictive covenants in our Indenture and the amended and restated Troms credit agreement could have significant consequences for our operations and future prospects.

Our level of indebtedness, and the restrictive covenants contained in the agreements governing our debt, could have important consequences for our operations, including:

making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under the agreements governing our indebtedness and increasing the risk that we may default on our debt obligations;

requiring us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations to required payments on indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of cash flow for working capital, capital expenditures, such as investing in new vessels, and other general business activities;

19

requiring that we pledge substantial collateral, including vessels, which may limit flexibility in operating our business and restrict our ability to sell assets;

limiting our ability to obtain additional financing in the future for working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions, debt service requirements, general corporate purposes and other activities;

limiting management’s flexibility in operating our business;

limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business and the industry in which we operate;

diminishing our ability to successfully withstand a further downturn in our business or further worsening of macroeconomic or industry conditions; and

placing us at a competitive disadvantage against less leveraged competitors.

We may not be able to obtain debt financing if and when needed with favorable terms, if at all.

If commodity prices remain depressed or decline or if E&P companies continue to assign a low priority to investments in offshore exploration, development and production, there could be a general outflow of credit and capital from the energy and energy services sectors and/or offshore-focused energy and energy service companies, as well as further efforts by lenders to reduce their loan exposure to the energy sector, impose increased lending standards for the energy and energy services sectors, increase borrowing costs and collateral requirements or refuse to extend new credit or amend existing credit facilities in the energy and energy services sectors. These potential negative consequences may be exacerbated by the pressure exerted on financial institutions by bank regulatory agencies to respond quickly and decisively to credit risk that develops in distressed industries. All of these factors may complicate the ability of borrowers to achieve a favorable outcome in negotiating solutions to even marginally stressed credits.

These factors could limit our ability to access debt markets, including for the purpose of refinancing or replacing our existing debt, cause us to refinance at increased interest rates, issue debt or enter into bank credit agreements with less favorable terms and conditions, which debt may require additional collateral and contain more restrictive terms, negatively impact current and prospective customers’ willingness to transact business with us, or impose additional insurance, guarantee and collateral requirements, all of which result in higher borrowing costs and may limit our long- and short-term financial flexibility.

Risks Relating to Our Vessels

Maintaining our current fleet size and configuration and acquiring vessels required for additional future growth require significant capital.

Expenditures required for the repair, certification and maintenance of a vessel, some of which may be unplanned, typically increase with vessel age. Additionally, stacked vessels are not maintained with the same diligence as our marketed fleet. Depending on the length of time the vessels are stacked, we may incur additional costs to return these vessels to active service. These costs are difficult to estimate and may be substantial. These expenditures may increase to a level at which they are not economically justifiable and, therefore, to maintain our current fleet size we may seek to construct or acquire additional vessels. Also, customers may prefer modern vessels over older vessels, especially in weaker markets. The cost of repairing and/or upgrading existing vessels or adding a new vessel to our fleet can be substantial. Moreover, while our vessels are undergoing repair, upgrade or maintenance, they may not earn a day rate during the period they are out of service.

While we expect our cash on hand, cash flow from operations and borrowings under new debt facilities to be adequate to fund our future potential purchases of additional vessels, our ability to pay these amounts is dependent upon the success of our operations. We can give no assurance that we will have sufficient capital resources to build or acquire the vessels required to expand or to maintain our current fleet size and vessel configuration.

We may not be able to renew or replace expiring contracts for our vessels.

We have a number of charters that expired in 2020 and others that will expire in 2021. Our ability to renew or replace expiring contracts or obtain new contracts, and the terms of any such contracts, will depend on various factors, including market conditions and the specific needs of our customers. Given the highly competitive and historically cyclical nature of our industry, we may not be able to renew or replace the contracts or we may be required to renew or replace expiring contracts or obtain new contracts at rates that are below, and potentially substantially below, existing day rates, or that have terms that are less favorable to us than are the terms of our existing contracts, or we may be unable to secure contracts for these vessels. This could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

20

The early termination of contracts on our vessels could have an adverse effect on our operations and our backlog may not be converted to actual operating results for any future period.

Most of the long-term contracts for our vessels and all of our contracts with governmental entities and national oil companies contain early termination options in favor of the customer, in some cases permitting termination for any reason. Although some of these contracts have early termination remedies in our favor or other provisions designed to discourage our customers from exercising such options, we cannot assure you that our customers would not choose to exercise their termination rights in spite of such remedies or the threat of litigation with us. Moreover, many of the contracts for our vessels have a term of one year or less and can be terminated with 90 days or less notice. Unless such vessels can be placed under contract with other customers, any termination could temporarily disrupt our business or otherwise adversely affect our financial condition and results of operations. We might not be able to replace such business or replace it on economically equivalent terms. In those circumstances, the amount of backlog could be reduced and the conversion of backlog into revenue could be impaired. Additionally, because of depressed commodity prices, adverse changes in credit markets, economic downturns, changes in priorities or strategy or other factors beyond our control, a customer may no longer want or need a vessel that is currently under contract or may be able to obtain a comparable vessel at a lower rate. For these reasons, customers may seek to renegotiate the terms of our existing contracts, terminate our contracts without justification or repudiate or otherwise fail to perform their obligations under our contracts. In any case, an early termination of a contract may result in one or more of our vessels being idle for an extended period of time. Each of these results could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

We may record additional losses or impairment charges related to our vessels.

We review the vessels in our active fleet for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset group may not be recoverable and we also perform a review of our stacked vessels not expected to return to active service whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a vessel may not be recoverable. We have realized impairment charges with respect to our long-lived assets over the past several years. In the event that offshore E&P industry conditions further deteriorate, or persist at current levels, we could be subject to additional long-lived asset impairments in future periods.

An impairment loss on our property and equipment exists when the estimated undiscounted cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition are less than its carrying amount. Any impairment loss recognized represents the excess of the asset’s carrying value over the estimated fair value. As part of this analysis, we make assumptions and estimates regarding future market conditions. To the extent actual results do not meet our estimated assumptions, we may take an impairment loss in the future. Additionally, there can be no assurance that we will not have to take additional impairment charges in the future if the currently depressed market conditions persist.

We may not be able to sell vessels to improve our cash flow and liquidity because we may be unable to locate buyers with access to financing or to complete any sales on acceptable terms or within a reasonable timeframe.

We may seek to sell some of our vessels to provide liquidity and improve our cash flow. However, given the current downturn in the oil and natural gas industry, there may not be sufficient activity in the market to sell our vessels, and we may not be able to identify buyers with access to financing or to complete any such sales. Even if we are able to locate appropriate buyers for our vessels, any sales may occur on significantly less favorable terms than the terms that might be available in a more liquid market or at other times in the business cycle.

Risks Relating to Our International and Foreign Operations

We operate in various regions throughout the world and are exposed to many risks inherent in doing business in countries other than the U.S.

We have substantial operations in Brazil, Mexico, the North Sea, Norway, Southeast Asia, Saudi Arabia, Angola, Nigeria and throughout the west coast of Africa, which generate a large portion of our revenue. Our customary risks of operating internationally include, but are not limited to, political, military, social and economic instability within the host country; possible vessel seizures or expropriation of assets and other governmental actions by the host country, including trade or economic sanctions and enforcement of customs, immigration or other laws that are not well developed or consistently enforced; foreign government regulations that favor or require the awarding of contracts to local competitors; risks associated with failing to comply with the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA), the United Kingdom (U.K.) Modern Slavery Act, the U.K. Bribery Act, the E.U. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), export laws and other similar laws applicable to our operations in international markets; an inability to recruit, retain or obtain work visas for workers of international operations; deprivation of contract rights; difficulties or delays in collecting customer and other accounts receivable; changing taxation policies; fluctuations in currency exchange rates; foreign currency revaluations and devaluations; restrictions on converting foreign currencies into U.S. dollars; expatriating customer and other payments made in jurisdictions outside of the U.S.; civil unrest, acts of terrorism, war or other armed conflict (further described below); and import/export quotas and restrictions or other trade barriers, most of which are beyond our control. See Note (5) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

21

We are also subject to risks relating to war, sabotage, piracy, kidnappings and terrorism or any similar risk that may put our personnel at risk and adversely affect our operations in unpredictable ways, including changes in the insurance markets as a result of war, sabotage, piracy or kidnappings, disruptions of fuel supplies and markets, particularly oil, and the possibility that infrastructure facilities, including pipelines, production facilities, refineries, electric generation, transmission and distribution facilities, offshore rigs and vessels, and communications infrastructures, could be direct targets of, or indirect casualties of, an act of war, piracy, sabotage or terrorism. War or risk of war or any such attack may also have an adverse effect on the economy, which could adversely affect activity in offshore oil and natural gas exploration, development and production and the demand for our services. Insurance coverage can be difficult to obtain in areas of pirate and terrorist attacks resulting in increased costs that could continue to increase. We periodically evaluate the need to maintain this insurance coverage as it applies to our fleet. Instability in the financial markets as a result of war, sabotage, piracy, and terrorism could also adversely affect our ability to raise capital and could also adversely affect the oil, natural gas and power industries and restrict their future growth. The increase in the level of these criminal or terrorist acts over the last several years has been well-publicized. As a marine services company that operates in offshore, coastal or tidal waters in challenging areas, we are particularly vulnerable to these kinds of unlawful activities. Although we take what we consider to be prudent measures to protect our personnel and assets in markets that present these risks, including solicitation of advice from third-party experts, we have confronted these kinds of incidents in the past, and there can be no assurance we will not be subjected to them in the future.

Global or regional public health crises and other catastrophic events could reduce economic activity resulting in lower commodity prices and could affect our crew rotations and entry into ports.

The current COVID-19 pandemic has caused several countries to restrict travel and quarantine those who have been exposed. Quarantines and the inability to move or interact freely will have an impact on economic results. In particular, such actions could reduce the world demand for oil. In addition, we may not be able to move freely in certain ports and we may not be able to economically move our vessel crews to and from our locations around the world.

We may have disruptions or disagreements with our foreign joint venture partners, which could lead to an unwinding of the joint venture.

We operate in several foreign areas through joint ventures with local companies, in some cases as a result of local laws requiring local company ownership. While the joint venture partner may provide local knowledge and experience, entering into joint ventures often requires us to surrender a measure of control over the assets and operations devoted to the joint venture, and occasions may arise when we do not agree with the business goals and objectives of our joint venture partner, or other factors may arise that make the continuation of the relationship unwise or untenable. Any such disagreements or discontinuation of the joint venture relationship could disrupt our operations, put assets dedicated to the joint venture at risk, or affect the continuity of our business. If we are unable to resolve issues with a joint venture partner, we may decide to terminate the joint venture and either locate a different partner and continue to work in the area or seek opportunities for our assets in another market. The unwinding of an existing joint venture could prove to be difficult or time-consuming, and the loss of revenue related to the termination or unwinding of a joint venture and costs related to the sourcing of a new partner or the mobilization of assets to another market could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. Please refer to Note (5) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion of our joint venture in Angola and our joint venture in Nigeria.

Our international operations expose us to currency devaluation and fluctuation risk.

As a global company, our international operations are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate risks on all charter hire contracts denominated in foreign currencies. For some of our international contracts, a portion of the revenue and local expenses is incurred in local currencies, which subjects us to risk of changes in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. In some instances, we receive payments in currencies that are not easily traded and may be illiquid. We generally do not hedge against any foreign currency rate fluctuations associated with foreign currency contracts that arise in the normal course of business, which exposes us to the risk of exchange rate losses. Gains and losses from the revaluation of our monetary assets and liabilities denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar are included in our consolidated statements of operations. Foreign currency fluctuations may cause the U.S. dollar value of our non-U.S. results of operations and net assets to vary with exchange rate fluctuations. This could have a negative impact on our results of operations and financial position. In addition, fluctuations in currencies relative to currencies in which the earnings are generated may make it more difficult to perform period-to-period comparisons of our reported results of operations.

To minimize the financial impact of these items, we attempt to contract a significant majority of our services in U.S. dollars and, when feasible, we attempt to not maintain large, non-U.S. dollar-denominated cash balances. In addition, we attempt to minimize the financial impact of these risks by matching the currency of our operating costs with the currency of revenue streams when considered appropriate. We monitor the currency exchange risks associated with all contracts not denominated in U.S. dollars.

Sonatide generally maintains Angolan kwanza-denominated deposits in Angolan banks, largely related to customer receipts in excess balances that are waiting to be converted to U.S. dollars, expatriated and then remitted to us. A devaluation in the Angolan kwanza relative to the U.S. dollar would result in foreign exchange losses for Sonatide to the extent the Angolan kwanza-denominated asset balances were in excess of kwanza-denominated liabilities. Under the current Sonatide joint venture structure, we would bear 49% of any potential losses.

22

With our extensive international operations, we are subject to certain compliance risks under the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, the United Kingdom Bribery Act or similar worldwide anti-bribery laws.

Our global operations require us to comply with a number of complex U.S. and international laws and regulations, including those involving anti-bribery and, anti-corruption. The FCPA and similar anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions, including the U.K. Bribery Act the United Nations Convention Against Corruption and the Brazil Clean Company Act, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business or obtaining an improper business benefit. We have adopted proactive procedures to promote compliance with the FCPA and other anti-bribery legislation, any failure to comply with the FCPA or other anti-bribery legislation could subject us to civil and criminal penalties or other fines or sanctions, including prohibition of our participating in or curtailment of business operations in those jurisdictions and the seizure of drilling rigs or other assets, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operation. Moreover, we may be held liable for actions taken by local partners or agents in violation of applicable anti-bribery laws, even though these partners or agents may themselves not be subject to such laws. Any determination that we have violated applicable anti-bribery laws in countries in which we do business could have a material adverse effect on our business and business reputation, as well as our results of operations, and cash flows. We operate in many parts of the world where governmental corruption is present and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with local customs and practices and impact our business.

The U.K.’s referendum to exit from the E.U. will have uncertain effects and could adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

On June 23, 2016, the U.K. voted to exit from the E.U. (commonly referred to as Brexit) and exited from the E.U. on January 31, 2020. The terms of Brexit and the resulting U.K./E.U. relationship are uncertain for companies doing business both in the U.K. and the overall global economy. In addition, our business and operations may be impacted by any subsequent E.U. member withdrawals and a vote in Scotland to seek independence from the U.K. Risks related to Brexit that we may encounter include:

adverse impact on macroeconomic growth and oil and natural gas demand;

continued volatility in currencies including the British pound and U.S. dollar that may impact our financial results;

reduced demand for our services in the U.K. and globally;

increased costs of doing business in the U.K. and in the North Sea;

increased regulatory costs and challenges for operating our business in the North Sea;

volatile capital and debt markets, and access to other sources of capital;

risks related to our global tax structure and the tax treaties upon which we rely;

legal and regulatory uncertainty and potentially divergent treaties, laws and regulations between the E.U. and U.K.

business uncertainty and instability resulting from prolonged political negotiations; and

uncertain stability of the E.U. and global economy if other countries exit the E.U.

Risks Relating to Governmental Regulation

There may be changes to complex and developing laws and regulations to which we are subject that would increase our cost of compliance and operational risk. 

Our operations are subject to many complex and burdensome laws and regulations. Stringent federal, state, local and foreign laws and regulations relating to a number of aspects of our business, including anti-bribery and anti-corruption laws, import and export controls, the environment, worker health and safety, labor and employment, taxation, antitrust and fair competition, data privacy protections, securities regulations and other regulatory and legal requirements that significantly affect our operations. Many aspects of the marine industry are subject to extensive governmental regulation by the U.S. Coast Guard, the U.S. Customs and Border Protection, and their foreign equivalents; as well as to standards imposed by private industry organizations such as the American Bureau of Shipping, the Oil Companies International Marine Forum, and the International Marine Contractors Association. Compliance with these laws and regulations may involve significant costs or require changes in our business practices that could result in reduced revenue and profitability. Non-compliance could also result in significant fines, damages, and other criminal sanctions against us, our officers or our employees, prohibitions or additional requirements on the conduct of our business and damage our reputation.

23

Further, many of the countries in which we operate have laws, regulations and enforcement systems that are less well developed than the laws, regulations and enforcement systems of the U.S., and the requirements of these systems are not always readily discernible even to experienced and proactive participants. These countries’ laws can be unclear, and, the application and enforcement of these laws and regulations can be unpredictable and subject to frequent change or reinterpretation. Sometimes governments may apply such changes or reinterpretations with retroactive effect, and may impose associated taxes, fees, fines or penalties based on that reinterpretation or retroactive effect. While we endeavor to comply with applicable laws and regulations, our compliance efforts might not always be wholly successful, and failure to comply may result in administrative and civil penalties, criminal sanctions, imposition of remedial obligations or the suspension or termination of our operations. These laws and regulations may expose us to liability for the conduct of, or conditions caused by, others, including charterers or third party agents. Moreover, these laws and regulations could be changed or be interpreted in new, unexpected ways that substantially increase costs that we may not be able to pass along to our customers. Any changes in laws, regulations or standards imposing additional requirements or restrictions, or any violation of such laws, regulations or standards, could adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Changes in U.S. and international tax laws and policies could adversely affect our financial results.

We operate in the U.S. and globally through various subsidiaries which are subject to applicable tax laws, treaties or regulations within and between the jurisdictions in which we conduct our business, including laws or policies directed toward companies organized in jurisdictions with low tax rates, which may change and are subject to interpretation. We determine our income tax expense based on our interpretation of the applicable tax laws and regulations in effect in each jurisdiction for the period during which we operate and earn income. A material change in the tax laws, tax treaties, regulations or accounting principles, or interpretation thereof, in one or more countries in which we conduct business, or in which we are incorporated or a resident of, could result in a higher effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings, and such change could be significant to our financial results. In addition, our overall effective tax rate could be adversely and suddenly affected by lower than anticipated earnings in countries with lower statutory rates and higher than anticipated earnings in countries with higher statutory rates, or by changes in the valuation of our deferred tax assets and liabilities. Moreover, our worldwide operations may change in the future such that the mix of our income and losses recognized in the various jurisdictions could change. Any such changes could reduce our ability to utilize tax benefits, such as foreign tax credits, and could result in an increase in our effective tax rate and tax expense.

The majority of our revenues and net income are generated by our operations outside of the U.S. Our effective tax rate has historically averaged approximately 30% until recent years where the decline of the oil and natural gas market significantly impacted our operations and overall effective tax rate. 

On December 22, 2017, the U.S. government enacted comprehensive tax legislation commonly referred to as the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the Tax Act). We continue to monitor the impact of the Tax Act on our ongoing operations. The impact of the Tax Act on our financial position in future periods could be adversely impacted by, among other things, changes in interpretations of the Tax Act, any legislative action to address questions that arise because of the Tax Act, or any changes in accounting standards for income taxes or related interpretations in response to the Tax Act. Additionally, longstanding international tax norms that determine each country’s jurisdiction to tax cross-border international trade are evolving as a result of the Base Erosion and Profit Shifting reporting requirements (BEPS) recommended by the G8, G20 and Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). As these and other tax laws and related regulations change, our financial results could be materially impacted. Given the unpredictability of these possible changes and their potential interdependency, it is very difficult to assess whether the overall effect of such potential tax changes would be cumulatively positive or negative for our earnings and cash flow, but such changes could adversely impact our financial results.

In addition, our income tax returns are subject to review and examination by the U.S. Internal Revenue Service and other tax authorities where tax returns are filed. We routinely evaluate the likelihood of adverse outcomes resulting from these examinations to determine the adequacy of our provision for taxes. We do not recognize the benefit of income tax positions we believe are more likely than not to be disallowed upon challenge by a tax authority. If any tax authority successfully challenges our operational structure or intercompany transfer pricing policies, or if the terms of certain income tax treaties were to be interpreted in a manner that is adverse to our structure, or if we lose a material tax dispute in any country, our effective tax rate on our worldwide earnings could increase, and our financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. 

Any changes in environmental regulations, including climate change and greenhouse gas restrictions, could increase the cost of energy and future production of oil and natural gas.

Our operations are subject to federal, state, local and international laws and regulations that control the discharge of pollutants into the environment or otherwise relate to environmental protection. Compliance with such laws and regulations may require installation of costly equipment, increased manning or operational changes. Some environmental laws may, in certain circumstances, impose strict liability for remediation of spills and releases of oil and hazardous substances, which could subject us to liability without regard to whether we were negligent or at fault.

24

Due to concern over the risk of climate change, a number of countries have adopted, or are considering the adoption of, regulatory frameworks to reduce the emission of carbon dioxide, methane and other gases (greenhouse gas emissions). These regulations include adoption of cap and trade regimes, carbon taxes, restrictive permitting, increased efficiency standards, and incentives or mandates for renewable energy. These requirements could make our customer’s products more expensive and reduce demand for hydrocarbons, as well as shift hydrocarbon demand toward relatively lower-carbon sources such as natural gas, any of which may reduce demand for our services. Notwithstanding the current downturn in the oil and natural gas industry punctuated by lessened demand and lower oil and natural gas prices, any such regulations could ultimately result in the increased cost of energy as well as environmental and other costs, and capital expenditures could be necessary to comply with the limitations. These developments may have an adverse effect on future production and demand for hydrocarbons such as crude oil and natural gas in areas of the world where our customers operate and thus adversely affect future demand for our offshore support vessels and other assets, which are highly dependent on the level of activity in offshore oil and natural gas exploration, development and production markets. In addition, the increased regulation of environmental emissions may create greater incentives for the use of alternative energy sources. Unless and until regulations are implemented and their effects are known, we cannot reasonably or reliably estimate their impact on our financial condition, results of operations and ability to compete. However, any long-term material adverse effect on the crude oil and natural gas industry may adversely affect our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Increasing attention to environmental, social and governance (ESG) matters may impact our business and some institutional investors may be discouraged from investing in the industry in which we operate.

Companies across all industries are facing increasing scrutiny from stakeholders related to their ESG practices. Investor advocacy groups, certain institutional investors, investment funds and other influential investors are also increasingly focused on ESG practices and in recent years have placed increasing importance on the implications and social cost of their investments. Regardless of the industry, investors’ increased focus and activism related to ESG and similar matters may hinder access to capital, as investors may decide to reallocate capital or to not commit capital as a result of their assessment of a company’s ESG practices. Companies which do not adapt to or comply with investor or stakeholder expectations and standards, which are evolving, or which are perceived to have not responded appropriately to the growing concern for ESG issues, regardless of whether there is a legal requirement to do so, may suffer from reputational damage and the business, financial condition, and/or stock price of such a company could be materially and adversely affected.

Specifically, adverse effects upon the oil and gas industry related to the worldwide social and political environment, including uncertainty or instability resulting from climate change, changes in political leadership and environmental policies, changes in geopolitical-social views toward fossil fuels and renewable energy, concern about the environmental impact of climate change and investors’ expectations regarding ESG matters, may also adversely affect demand for our services. Any long-term material adverse effect on the oil and gas industry would likely have a significant financial and operational adverse impact on our business.

In addition, some institutional investors are placing an increased emphasis on ESG factors when allocating their capital. These investors may be seeking enhanced ESG disclosures or may implement policies that discourage investment in the hydrocarbon industry. To the extent that certain institutions implement policies that discourage investments in our industry, it could have an adverse effect on our financing costs and access to liquidity and capital.

Risks Relating to Our Employees

We may have difficulty attracting, motivating and retaining executives and other key personnel.

The success of our business depends on the efforts and skill of our senior management team and other key personnel. Uncertainty about the effect of changes to our company and about the changes we have made or may make to the organizational structure may impair our ability to attract and retain key personnel. In addition, our industry has lost a significant number of experienced professionals over the years due to its cyclical nature, which is attributable, among other reasons, to the continuing depressed levels of oil and natural gas prices and a more generalized concern about the overall future prospects of the industry.

If executives, managers or other key personnel resign, retire or are terminated or their service is otherwise interrupted, we may not be able to replace them in a timely manner and we could experience significant declines in productivity. These uncertainties could affect our relationship with customers, vendors and other parties. Accordingly, no assurance can be given that we will be able to attract, retain and motivate executives, managers, and other key personnel to the same extent as in the past.

We may be subject to additional unionization efforts, new collective bargaining agreements or through third party labor service providers (manning agencies). For crew members who work stoppages.

In locations in whichwith us through these manning agencies, the individuals are employed by the agency (a third party) but we are required to do so, we have union workers subject to collective bargaining agreements,responsible for setting the pay or “day rate,” which are subject to periodic negotiation. These negotiations could result in higher personnel expenses, other increased costs,the employee may accept or increased operational restrictions. Disputes over the terms of these agreements or our potential inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with the unions that represent our employees under these agreements could result in strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns by the affected workers. Further, efforts have been made from time to time to unionize other portions of our workforce, including our U.S. GOM employees. Additional unionization efforts, new collective bargaining agreements or work stoppages could materially increase our costs and operating restrictions, disrupt our operations, reduce our revenues, adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations, or limit our flexibility.

25

Our participation in industry-wide, multi-employer, defined benefit pension plans expose us to potential future losses.

Certain of our subsidiaries are participating employers in two industry-wide, multi-employer defined benefit pension plans in the U.K. Among other risks associated with multi-employer plans, contributions and unfunded obligations of the multi-employer plan are shared by the plan participants.reject. As a result, weour crew members may inherit unfunded obligations ifnot work for us full-time or during the entire year and may in fact also provide services on vessels owned by other plan participants withdraw fromcompanies or operators during the plan or cease to participate, and in the event that we withdraw from participation in one or bothyear. The majority of these plans, we may be required to pay the plan an amount basedindividuals provide services on our allocable sharevessels that operate outside of the underfunded statusUnited States, including in areas where wages may not be comparable to wages paid to workers who provide services on U.S.-based vessels. Due to our global footprint and the lack of continuity in workforce, the plan. Depending on the results of future actuarial valuations, it is possible that the plans could experience further deficits that will require funding from us, which would negatively impact our financial position, results of operations and cash flows.

Certaincompensation profile of our employees are covered by federal laws thatemployee population as reported in this pay ratio disclosure may subject us to job-related claims in addition to those provided by state laws.

Certainnot be completely reflective of our employees are covered by provisions of the Jones Act, the Death on the High Seas Act and general maritime law. These laws preempt state workers’ compensation laws and permit these employees and their representatives to pursue actions against employers for job-related incidents in federal courts based on tort theories. Because we are not generally protected by the damage limits imposed by state workers’ compensation statutes for these types of claims, we may have greater exposure for any claims made by these employees.

Risks Related to Information Technology and Cybersecurity

Cybersecurity attacks on any of our facilities, or those of third parties, may result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise adversely affect our business.

Many of our business and operational processes are heavily dependent on traditional and emerging technology systems, some of which are managed by us and some of which are managed by third-party service and equipment providers, to conduct day-to-day operations, improve safety and efficiency and lower costs. We use computerized systems to help run our financial and operations functions, including the processing of payment transactions, store confidential records and conduct vessel operations, which may subject our business to increased risks. If any of our financial, operational, or other technology systems fail or have other significant shortcomings, our financial results could be adversely affected. Our financial results could also be adversely affected if an employee or other third party causes our operational systems to fail, either as a result of inadvertent error or by deliberately tampering with or manipulating our operational systems. In addition, dependence upon automated systems, including those on board our vessels, may further increase the risk that operational system flaws, employee or other tampering or manipulation of those systems will result in losses that are difficult to detect.

Cybersecurity incidents are increasing in frequency and magnitude. These incidents may include, but are not limited to, installation of malicious software, phishing, credential attacks, unauthorized access to data and other advanced and sophisticated cybersecurity breaches and threats, including threats that increasingly target critical operations technologies and process control networks. Any cybersecurity attacks that affect our facilities or operations, our customers or any financial data could have a material adverse effect on our business. In addition, cyber-attacks on our customer and employee data may result in a financial loss and may negatively impact our reputation. Third-party systems on which we rely could also suffer such attacks or operational system failures. Any of these occurrences could disrupt our business, result in potential liability or reputational damage or otherwise have an adverse effect on our business, operations and financial results.

In addition, laws and regulations governing data privacy and the unauthorized disclosure of confidential or protected information, including the GDPR and recent legislation in certain U.S. states, pose increasingly complex compliance challenges and potentially elevate costs, and any failure to comply with these laws and regulations could result in significant penalties and legal liability.

Risks Related to Our Securities

Our common stock is subject to restriction on foreign ownership and possible required divestiture by non-U.S. Citizen stockholders.

Certain of our operations are conducted in the U.S. coastwise trade and are governed by the U.S. federal law commonly known as the Jones Act. The Jones Act restricts waterborne transportation of goods and passengers between points in the U.S. to vessels owned and controlled by “U.S. Citizens” as defined thereunder. We could lose the privilege of owning and operating vessels in the Jones Act trade if non-U.S. Citizens were to own or control, in the aggregate, more than 25% of our common stock. Such loss could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

26

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and Second Amended and Restated By-Laws authorize our Board of Directors to establish with respect to any class or series of our capital stock certain rules, policies and procedures, including procedures with respect to the transfer of shares, to ensure compliance with the Jones Act. In order to provide a reasonable margin for compliance with the Jones Act, our Board of Directors has determined that, all non-U.S. Citizens in the aggregate may own up to 24% of the outstanding shares of common stock and any individual non-U.S. Citizen may own up to 4.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock.

At and during such time that the permitted limit of ownership by non-U.S. Citizens is reached with respect to shares of common stock, as applicable, we will be unable to issue any further shares of such class of common stock or approve transfers of such class of common stock to non-U.S. Citizens. Any purported transfer of our common stock in violation of these ownership provisions will be ineffective to transfer the common stock or any voting, dividend or other rights associated with such common stock. The existence and enforcement of these requirements could have an adverse impact on the liquidity or market value of our equity securities in the event that U.S. Citizens were unable to transfer our shares to non-U.S. Citizens. Furthermore, under certain circumstances, this ownership requirement could discourage, delay or prevent a change of control.

The market price of our securities is subject to volatility.

The market price of our common stock could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to, and the level of trading that develops with our common stock may be affected by, numerous factors beyond our control such as, our limited trading history subsequentcompensation paid to our emergence from bankruptcy, the fact that on occasion our securities may be thinly traded, the lack of comparable historical financial information due to our adoption of fresh start accounting, actual or anticipated variations in our operating results and cash flow, business conditions in our markets and the general state of the securities markets and the market for energy-related stocks, as well as general economic and market conditions and other factors that may affect our future results, including those described in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Because we currently have no plans to pay cash dividends or other distributions on our common stock, you may not receive any return on investment unless you sell your common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

We currently do not pay and do not expect to pay any cash dividends or other distributions on our common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future determination to pay cash dividends or other distributions on our common stock will be at the sole discretion of our Board of Directors and, if we elect to pay such dividends in the future, we may reduce or discontinue entirely the payment of such dividends thereafter at any time. The Board of Directors may take into account general and economic conditions, our financial condition and operating results, our available cash and current and anticipated cash needs, capital requirements, agreements governing any existing and future indebtedness we or our subsidiaries may incur and other contractual, legal, tax and regulatory restrictions and implications on the payment of dividends by us to our stockholders, and such other factors as the Board of Directors may deem relevant. As a result, you may not receive any return on an investment in our common stock unless you sell our common stock for a price greater than that which you paid for it.

Our ability to raise capital in the future may be limited, which could make us unable to fund our capital requirements.

Our business and operations may consume cash more quickly than we anticipate potentially impairing our ability to make capital expenditures to maintain our fleet and other assets in suitable operating condition. If our cash flows from operating activities are not sufficient to fund capital expenditures, we would be required to further reduce these expenditures or to fund capital expenditures through debt or equity issuances or through alternative financing plans or selling assets. If adequate funds are not available on acceptable terms, we may be unable to fund our capital requirements. Our ability to raise debt or equity capital or to refinance or restructure existing debt arrangements will depend on the condition of the capital markets, our financial condition and cash flow generating capacity at such time, among other things. Any limitations in our ability to finance future capital expenditures may limit our ability to respond to changes in customer preferences, technological change and other market conditions, which may diminish our competitive position within our sector.

If we issue additional equity securities, existing stockholders will experience dilution. Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation permits our Board of Directors to issue preferred stock which could have rights and preferences senior to those of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, our security holders bear the risk of our future securities offerings reducing the market price of our common stock or other securities, diluting their interest or being subject to rights and preferences senior to their own.

27

Anti-takeover provisions and limitations on foreign ownership in our organizational documents could delay or prevent a change of control.

Certain provisions of our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation and our Second Amended and Restated By-Laws and Delaware law could delay, defer or prevent a merger, acquisition, tender offer, takeover attempt or other change of control transaction that our stockholders may deem advantageous, including those attempts that might result in a premium over the market price for the shares held by our stockholders or negatively affect the trading price of our common stock and other securities. These provisions could also discourage proxy contests and make it more difficult for you and other stockholders to elect directors of your choosing and to cause us to take other corporate actions you desire. These provisions provide for, among other things:

the ability of our Board of Directors to issue, and determine the rights, powers and preferences of, one or more series of preferred stock;

advance notice for nominations of directors by stockholders and for stockholders to present matters for consideration at our annual meetings;

limitations on convening special stockholder meetings;

the prohibition on stockholders to act by written consent;

supermajority vote of stockholders to amend certain provisions of the certificate of incorporation;

limitations on expanding the size of the Board of Directors;

the availability for issuance of additional shares of common stock; and

restrictions on the ability of any natural person or entity that does not satisfy the citizenship requirements of the U.S. maritime laws to own, in the aggregate, more than 24% of the outstanding shares of our common stock.

In addition, the Delaware General Corporation Law imposes restrictions on mergers and other business combinations between us and any holder of 15% or more of our outstanding common stock.

The exercise of all or any number of outstanding warrants or the issuance of stock-based awards may dilute your holding of shares of our common stock.

We have issued or assumed a number of securities providing for the right to purchase our common stock. Investors could be subject to increased dilution upon the exercise of our New Creditor Warrants and GLF Creditor Warrants for a nominal exercise price subject to Jones Act-related foreign ownership restrictions, and the exercise of our Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants and GLF Equity Warrants. Unexercised Series A Warrants and Series B Warrants will expire on July 31, 2023. Unexercised GLF Equity Warrants expire on November 14, 2024. Unexercised New Creditor Warrants expire on July 31, 2042 and unexercised GLF Creditor Warrants expire on November 14, 2042.

Additionally, shares of common stock were reserved for issuance under the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and Legacy GulfMark Stock Incentive Plan, respectively, as equity-based awards to employees, directors and certain other persons. The exercise of equity awards, including any restricted stock units that we may grant in the future, and the exercise of warrants and the subsequent sale of shares of common stock issued thereby, could have an adverse effect on the market for our common stock, including the price that an investor could obtain for their shares. Investors may experience dilution in the value of their investment upon the exercise of the warrants and any equity awards that may be granted or issued pursuant to the 2017 Stock Incentive Plan and the Legacy GulfMark Stock Incentive Plan.

Please refer to Notes (10) and (11) of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for additional discussion of our outstanding warrants and stock-based awards.

There may be a limited trading market for our New Creditor Warrants and GLF Creditor Warrants, and you may have difficulty trading and obtaining quotations for New Creditor Warrants and GLF Creditor Warrants.

While there are unsolicited quotes for our New Creditor Warrants on the OTC Pink Market, there is no market maker for this security on the OTC Pink Market, and there can be no assurance that an active trading market will develop. While the GLF Creditor Warrants trade on OTC QX market, there has been limited trading volume since the business combination. The lack of an active market may impair your ability to sell your New Creditor Warrants or GLF Creditor Warrants at the time you wish to sell them or at a price that you consider reasonable. The lack of an active market may also reduce the fair market value of your New Creditor Warrants or GLF Creditor Warrants. As a result, you may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our New Creditor Warrants or GLF Creditor Warrants. This severely limits the liquidity of our New Creditor Warrants and the GLF Creditor Warrants and will likely reduce the market price of our New Creditor Warrants and the GLF Creditor Warrants.

28

There is no guarantee that the Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants and GLF Equity Warrants issued by us or assumed by us will ever be in the money, and unexercised warrants may expire with limited or no value. Further, the terms of such warrants may be amended.

As long as our stock price is below the strike price of each of the Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants and GLF Equity Warrants, $57.06 per share for Series A Warrants, $62.28 per share for Series B Warrants and $100.00 per share for the GLF Equity Warrants), these warrants will have limited economic value, and they may expire with limited or no value. In addition, the warrant agreement provides that the terms of the warrants may be amended without the consent of any holder to cure any ambiguity or correct any defective provision, but requires the approval by the holders of at least a certain percentage of the then-outstanding warrants originally issued to make any change that adversely affects the interests of the holders. Any material amendment to the terms of the warrant in a manner adverse to a holder would require holders of at least a certain percentage of the then outstanding warrants, but less than all holders, approve of such amendment.

We may not be able to maintain a listing of our common stock, Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants and GLF Equity Warrants on the NYSE or NYSE American.

We must meet certain financial and liquidity criteria to maintain the listing of our securities on the NYSE or NYSE American, as applicable. If we fail to meet any of the NYSE or NYSE American’s continued listing standards, our common stock, Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants, or GLF Equity Warrants may be delisted. A delisting of our common stock, Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants, or GLF Equity Warrants may materially impair our stockholders’ and warrant holders’ ability to buy and sell our common stock, Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants, or GLF Equity Warrants and could have an adverse effect on the market price of, and the efficiency of, the trading market for these securities. A delisting of our common stock, Series A Warrants, Series B Warrants or GLF Equity Warrants could significantly impair our ability to raise capital.

General Risk Factors

Uncertain economic conditions may lead our customers to postpone capital spending or jeopardize our customers’ or other counterparties’ ability to perform their obligations.

Uncertainty about future global economic market conditions makes it challenging to forecast operating results and to make decisions about future investments. The success of our business is both directly and indirectly dependent upon conditions in the global financial and credit markets that are outside of our control and difficult to predict. Uncertain economic conditions may lead our customers to postpone capital spending in response to tighter credit markets and reductions in our customers’ income or asset values. Similarly, when lenders and institutional investors reduce, and in some cases, cease to provide funding to corporate and other industrial borrowers, the liquidity and financial condition of the company and our customers can be adversely impacted. These factors may also adversely affect our liquidity and financial condition. Factors such as interest rates, availability of credit, inflation rates, economic uncertainty, changes in laws (including laws relating to taxation), trade barriers and economic sanctions or other restrictions imposed by the U.S. or other countries, commodity prices, currency exchange rates and controls, and national and international political circumstances (including wars, terrorist acts, security operations, and seaborne refugee issues) can have a material negative effect on our business, revenues and profitability.

Additionally, continued uncertain industry conditions could jeopardize the ability of certain of our counterparties, including our customers, insurers and financial institutions, to perform their obligations. Although we assess the creditworthiness of our counterparties, a prolonged period of difficult industry conditions could lead to changes in a counterparty’s liquidity and increase our exposure to credit risk and bad debts. In addition, we may offer extended payment terms to our customers in order to secure contracts. These circumstances may lead to more frequent collection issues. Our financial results and liquidity could be adversely affected.

There are uncertainties in identifying and integrating acquisitions and mergers.

Although acquisitions have historically been an element of our business strategy, we cannot assure investors that we will be able to identify and acquire acceptable acquisition candidates on terms favorable to us in the future. We may be required to use our cash, issue equity securities, or incur substantial indebtedness to finance future acquisitions or mergers. Any of these financing options could reduce our profitability and harm our business or only be available to us on unfavorable terms, if at all, and could require concessions under our current indebtedness that our lenders might not be willing to grant. Such additional debt service requirements may impose a significant burden on our results of operations and financial condition, and any equity issuance could have a dilutive impact on our stockholders.

We cannot be certain that we will be able to successfully consolidate the operations and assets of any acquired business with our own business. Acquisitions may not perform as expected when the transaction was consummated and may be dilutive to our overall operating results. In addition, valuations supporting our acquisitions and strategic investments could change rapidly given the current global economic climate. We could determine that such valuations have experienced impairments or other-than-temporary declines in fair value which could adversely impact our financial results. Moreover, our management may not be able to effectively manage a substantially larger business or successfully operate a new line of business.

Our business could be negatively affected as a result of actions of activist stockholders.

Activist stockholders could advocate for changes to our corporate governance, operational practices and strategic direction, which could have an adverse effect on our reputation, business and future operations. In recent years, publicly-traded companies have been increasingly subject to demands from activist stockholders advocating for changes to corporate governance practices, such as executive compensation practices, social issues, or for certain corporate actions or reorganizations. There can be no assurances that activist stockholders won’t publicly advocate for us to make certain corporate governance changes or engage in certain corporate actions. Responding to challenges from activist stockholders, such as proxy contests, media campaigns or other activities, could be costly and time consuming and could have an adverse effect on our reputation and divert the attention and resources of management and our Board, which could have an adverse effect on our business and operational results. Additionally, stockholder activism could create uncertainty about future strategic direction, resulting in loss of future business opportunities, which could adversely affect our business, future operations, profitability and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

None.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Information on Properties is contained in Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

For a discussion of our material legal proceedings, see Note (12) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Various legal proceedings and claims are outstanding which arose in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None.

29

workers.
 

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS, AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Common Stock Market Prices

Our common stock is traded on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) under the symbol “TDW.” At February 15, 2021, there were 684 record holders of our common stock, based on the record holder list maintained by our stock transfer agent.  

Issuer Repurchases of Equity Securities

No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018.

Dividends

There were no dividends declared during the years ended December 31, 2020. 2019 and 2018.

30

Performance Graph

The following graph and table compare the cumulative total return to our stockholders on our common stock beginning with the commencement of trading upon our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 31, 2017 through December 31, 2020, relative to the cumulative total returns of the Russell 2000 Stock Index, the PHLX Oil Service Sector Index, and the Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services Index. The analysis assumes the investment of $100 on August 1, 2017, at closing prices on July 31, 2017, and the reinvestment of dividends into additional shares of the same class of equity securities at the frequency with which dividends are paid on such securities during the applicable fiscal year.

tidewatergraph.jpg

Indexed returns

                    
  

August 1,

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

Company name/Index

 

2017

  

2017

  

2018

  

2019

  

2020

 

Tidewater Inc.

  100   98   77   77   35 

Russell 2000

  100   108   96   121   145 

PHLX Oil Service sector

  100   112   61   61   35 

Dow Jones U.S. Oil Equipment & Services

  100   105   60   65   40 

Investors are cautioned against drawing conclusions from the data contained in the graph, as past results are not necessarily indicative of future performance.

The above graph is being furnished pursuant to SEC rules. It will not be incorporated by reference into any filing under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) or the Exchange Act, except to the extent that we specifically incorporate it by reference.

31

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the accompanying consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion and analysis contain forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our future results of operations could differ materially from our historical results or those anticipated in our forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors” in Item 1A and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. With respect to this section, the cautionary language applicable to such forward-looking statements described under “Forward-Looking Statements” found before Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is incorporated by reference into this Item 7.

About Tidewater

Our vessels and associated vessel services provide support for all phases of offshore oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production as well as windfarm development and maintenance. These services include towing of, and anchor handling for, mobile offshore drilling units; transporting supplies and personnel necessary to sustain drilling, workover and production activities; offshore construction and seismic and subsea support; geotechnical survey support for windfarm construction; and a variety of specialized services such as pipe and cable laying. In addition, we have one of the broadest geographic operating footprints in the offshore vessel industry. Our global operating footprint allows us to react quickly to changing local market conditions and to be responsive to the changing requirements of the many customers with which we believe we have strong relationships. We are also one of the most experienced international operators in the offshore energy industry with a history spanning over 60 years.

On November 15, 2018 (Merger Date), we completed our merger with GulfMark Offshore, Inc. GulfMark pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of the Merger dated July 15, 2018. GulfMark’s balances and results are included in our consolidated financial statements and disclosures beginning on the Merger Date.  Therefore, our balances and results for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include GulfMark’s operations while our balances and results for the year ended December 30, 2018 only include GulfMark’s operations for the last 45 days.

At December 31, 2020, we owned 172 vessels with an average age of 10.4 years (excluding 3 joint venture vessels, but including 35 stacked active vessels and 23 vessels designated for sale) available to serve the global energy industry. The average age of our 149 active vessels at December 31, 2020 is 10.2 years.

Principal Factors That Drive Our Results

Our revenues, net earnings and cash flows from operations are largely dependent upon the activity level of our offshore marine vessel fleet. As is the case with the numerous other vessel operators in our industry, our business activity is largely dependent on the level of exploration, field development and production activity of our customers. Our customers’ business activity, in turn, is dependent on current and expected crude oil and natural gas prices, which fluctuate depending on expected future levels of supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas, and on estimates of the cost to find, develop and produce crude oil and natural gas reserves.

Our revenues in all segments are driven primarily by our fleet size, vessel utilization and day rates. Because a sizeable portion of our operating and depreciation costs do not change proportionally with changes in revenue, our operating profit is largely dependent on revenue levels.

Operating costs consist primarily of crew costs, repair and maintenance costs, insurance costs, fuel, lube oil and supplies costs and other vessel operating costs. Fleet size, fleet composition, geographic areas of operation, supply and demand for marine personnel, and local labor requirements are the major factors which affect overall crew costs in all segments. In addition, our newer, more technologically sophisticated vessels generally require a greater number of specially trained, more highly compensated fleet personnel than our older, smaller and less sophisticated vessels. Crew costs may increase if competition for skilled personnel intensifies, although a weaker offshore energy market could mitigate any potential inflation of crew costs.

32

Costs related to the recertification of vessels are deferred and amortized over 30 months on a straight-line basis. Maintenance costs incurred at the time of the recertification drydocking that are not related to the recertification of the vessel are expensed as incurred. Costs related to vessel improvements that either extend the vessel’s useful life or increase the vessel’s functionality are capitalized and depreciated.

Insurance costs are dependent on a variety of factors, including our safety record and pricing in the insurance markets, and can fluctuate over time. Our vessels are generally insured for up to their estimated fair market value in order to cover damage or loss resulting from marine casualties, adverse weather conditions, mechanical failure, collisions, and property losses to the vessel. We also purchase coverage for potential liabilities stemming from third-party losses with limits that we believe are reasonable for our operations, but do not generally purchase business interruption insurance or similar coverage. Insurance limits are reviewed annually, and third-party coverage is purchased based on the expected scope of ongoing operations and the cost of third-party coverage.

Fuel and lube costs can also fluctuate in any given period depending on the number and distance of vessel mobilizations, the number of active vessels off charter, drydockings, and changes in fuel prices. We also incur vessel operating costs that are aggregated as “other” vessel operating costs. These costs consist of brokers’ commissions, including commissions paid to unconsolidated joint venture companies, training costs, satellite communication fees, agent fees, port fees and other miscellaneous costs. Brokers’ commissions are incurred primarily in our non-U.S. operating areas where brokers oftentimes assist us in obtaining work. Brokers generally are paid a percentage of day rates billed upon collection of the amounts invoiced and, accordingly, commissions paid to brokers generally fluctuate in accordance with vessel revenue.

Deepwater activity is a significant segment of the global offshore crude oil and natural gas markets, and a significant component of our business. Development typically involves significant capital investment and multi-year development plans. Such projects are generally underwritten by the participating exploration, field development and production companies using relatively conservative crude oil and natural gas pricing assumptions. Although these projects are generally less susceptible to short-term fluctuations in the price of crude oil and natural gas, deepwater exploration and development projects can be more costly relative to other onshore and offshore exploration and development. As a result, generally depressed crude oil prices have caused, and may continue to cause, many of our customers and potential customers to reevaluate their future capital expenditures in regard to deepwater projects.

Sonatide

We previously disclosed the significant financial and operational challenges that we confront with respect to operations in Angola, as well as steps that we have taken to address or mitigate those risks. Most of our attention has been focused in three areas: (i) reducing the net receivable balance due from Sonatide, our Angolan joint venture with Sonangol, for vessel services; (ii) reducing the foreign currency risk created by virtue of provisions of Angolan law that require that payment for a  portion of the services provided by Sonatide be paid in Angolan kwanza; and (iii) optimizing opportunities, consistent with Angolan law, for services provided by us to be paid for directly in U.S. dollars. In late 2019, we were informed that, as part of a broad privatization program, Sonangol intends to seek to divest itself from Sonatide.

In the second quarter of 2020, Sonatide declared a $35.0 million dividend.  On June 22, 2020, Sonangol received $17.8 million and we received $17.2 million.  Our share of the dividend is reflected as dividend income from unconsolidated company in the consolidated statement of operations because (i) our investment in Sonatide had previously been written down to zero, (ii) the distributions are not refundable and (iii) we are not liable for the obligations of or committed to provide financial support to Sonatide.  In addition, as a result of the aforementioned dividend payment, the cash balances of the joint venture were significantly reduced and we determined that, as a result, a significant portion of our net due from Sonatide balance was compromised.  During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a $40.9 million affiliate credit loss impairment expense.

DTDW

We own 40% of DTDW in Nigeria.  Our partner, who owns 60%, is a Nigerian national.  DTDW owns one offshore service vessel and has long term debt of $4.7 million which is secured by the vessel and guarantees from the DTDW partners. We also operate company owned vessels in Nigeria for which the joint venture receives a commission.  As of December 31, 2020, we had no company owned vessels operating in Nigeria and the DTDW owned vessel was not employed.  At the beginning of 2020 we had expected that we would be operating numerous vessels in Nigeria, but in the second quarter of 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting oil price reduction caused our primary customer in Nigeria to eliminate all planned operations for 2020.  As a result, the near-term cash flow projections indicate that DTDW does not have sufficient funds to meet its obligations to us or to the holder of its long-term debt.  Therefore, we recorded affiliate credit loss impairment expense for the year ended December 31, 2020 totaling $12.1 million.  In addition, based on our analysis we have determined that DTDW will be unable to pay its debt obligation and the debt will not be satisfied by liquidating the vessel and, as a result, we recorded additional impairment expense of $2.0 million for our expected share of the obligation guarantee during the year ended December 31, 2020.  

Industry Conditions and Outlook

Our business is directly impacted by the level of activity in worldwide offshore oil and natural gas exploration, development and production, which in turn is influenced by trends in oil and natural gas prices. In addition, oil and natural gas prices are affected by a host of geopolitical and economic forces, including the fundamental principles of supply and demand.  In particular, the oil price is significantly influenced by actions of the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries, or OPEC.  Prices are subject to significant uncertainty and, as a result, are extremely volatile. Beginning in late 2014, oil prices declined significantly from levels of over $100.00 per barrel and continued to decline throughout 2015 and into 2016 causing an industry-wide downturn. Prices began to stabilize in the  $50.00 to $60.00 per barrel range in 2019 and early 2020. However, in the first quarter of 2020 the industry was severely impacted by the previously discussed global pandemic (COVID-19) and the resulting loss of demand and decrease in oil prices.

As COVID-19 spread throughout the world, its impact on many of our locations, including our vessels, has affected our operations.  We have implemented various protocols for both onshore and offshore personnel in efforts to limit this impact, but there is no assurance that those efforts will be fully successful. Any spread of COVID-19 to our onshore workforce or  key management personnel could prevent us from supporting our offshore operations, reduce productivity as our onshore personnel continue to work remotely, and disrupt our business. Any outbreak on our vessels may result in the vessel, or some or all of a vessel crew, being quarantined and therefore impede the vessel’s ability to generate revenue.  We have experienced challenges in connection with our offshore crew changes due to health and travel restrictions related to COVID-19, and those challenges and/or restrictions are expected to continue despite our efforts at mitigating them.  To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our operations and business, it may also have the effect of heightening many of the other risks set forth in our SEC filings.

The effect on our business includes lockdowns of shipyards where we have vessels performing drydocks which will delay vessels returning to service and the cancellation and/or temporary delay of certain revenue vessel contracts allowed either under the contract provisions or by mutual agreement with our customers. These cancellations and/or temporary delays reduced our 2020 revenues by approximately 18.0%.  We also incurred approximately $18.0 million in higher operating costs, primarily related to additional crew costs, mobilization and vessel stacking costs as a result of these unplanned contract cancellations.  There may be additional cancellations or delays.

As a company, we have undertaken the following temporary measures to assist us in weathering the COVID-19 pandemic and allow us to recover as soon as possible:

Planned capital and drydock expenditures tied to contracts referenced above will be temporarily delayed or cancelled.  As a result of the ongoing contract cancellations and delays we postponed drydocks expected to cost approximately $23.3 million in 2020. Budgeted drydocks expenditures for 2021 are expected to be approximately $19.0 million. It is possible that additional planned drydocks will be cancelled or delayed due to contract cancellations or delays.  We cannot predict the number or cost of any additional cancellations or delays.

We have the ability to rapidly respond to contract cancellations and delays.  We have or will remove the crews and shut down all operations, depending on contract terms, on vessels associated with cancelled or delayed contracts.  We continue to evaluate our general and administrative costs to reflect the current demand for our offshore support vessels.

The full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business and operations will depend on the severity, location, and duration of the effects and spread of the pandemic itself, the actions undertaken by national, regional, and local governments and health officials to contain the virus or treat its effects, and how quickly and to what extent economic conditions improve and normal business and operating conditions resume.  As we cannot predict the duration or scope of this pandemic, the anticipated negative financial impact to our operating results cannot be reasonably estimated but could be both material and long-lasting.

In the first and second quarters of 2020, we considered these events surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic and the resulting oil price decrease and demand reduction to be indicators that the value of our active offshore vessel fleet may be impaired.  As a result, as of March 31, 2020 and  June 30, 2020 , we performed Step 1 evaluations of our active offshore fleet under FASB Accounting Standards Codification 360, which governs the methodology for identifying and recording impairment of long-lived assets to determine if any of our asset groups have net book value in excess of undiscounted future net cash flows. Our evaluations did not indicate impairment of any of our asset groups.  During the third quarter conditions related to the pandemic and oil price environment did not worsen from the second quarter and in the fourth quarter industry conditions marginally improved compared with the third quarter.  As a result, we did not identify additional events or conditions that would require us to perform a Step 1 evaluation during either quarter.  We will continue to monitor the expected future cash flows and the fair market value of our asset groups for impairment.

Results of Operations

We manage and measure our business performance primarily based on four distinct geographic operating segments: Americas, Middle East/Asia Pacific, Europe/Mediterranean and West Africa. 

33

This section of this Form 10-K generally discusses 2020 and 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2020 and 2019. Discussions of 2019 items and year-to-year comparisons between 2019 and 2018 that are not included in this Form 10-K can be found in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Part II, Items 7. and 7A. of the company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019

Our 2020 results are affected by the following factors:

The global COVID-19 pandemic and concurrent drop in crude oil demand and price had a substantial effect on our revenues and operations through all segments.  Although we were able to reduce our costs substantially as revenues came down, the overall effect was negative on our results of operations. The cancellation and/or temporary delay of certain revenue vessel contracts reduced our 2020 revenues by approximately 18.0%.  We also incurred approximately $18.0 million in higher operating costs, primarily related to additional crew costs, mobilization and vessel stacking costs as a result of these unplanned contract cancellations.

As of  December 31, 2020, we owned 149 active offshore support vessels operated in our four segments throughout the world, of which 35 were temporarily stacked. 

During 2020, we identified and reclassified 32 of our vessels from property and equipment to assets held for sale in addition to the 46 vessels designated for sale in 2019.  In conjunction with the reclassification, we revalued the vessels at the lower of net book value and estimated net realizable value.During the year  ended December 31, 2020, we recorded impairment expense of $75.2 million related to our assets held for sale. In 2020 we have sold 56 vessels, 53 of which were classified as assets held for sale and three of which were sold from our active fleet.  We recognized $7.5 million in net gains on the sales of these vessels in 2020. At December 31, 2020 we have 23 vessels remaining in assets held for sale.

We also recorded $53.0 million in affiliate credit loss impairment expense as a significant portion of the due from affiliate balances from our two joint ventures in Angola and Nigeria was compromised.   In addition, we determined that our Nigerian joint venture would be unable to pay its debt obligation and as a result, we recorded additional impairment expense of $2.0 million for our expected share of the obligation guarantee.   


The above factors are discussed in more detail and in context in the consolidated and segment results of operations comparisons for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 below.

The following tables present vessel revenue by segment, vessel operating costs by segment, the related segment vessel revenue and operating costs as a percentage of segment vessel revenues, total vessel revenue and operating costs and the related total vessel revenue and operating costs as a percentage of total vessel revenues for our owned and operated vessel fleet:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

      %      %

Vessel revenues:

                

Americas

 $126,676   33% $136,958   29%

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  97,133   25%  90,321   19%

Europe/Mediterranean

  83,602   22%  123,711   26%

West Africa

  78,763   20%  126,025   26%

Total vessel revenues

 $386,174   100% $477,015   100%

34

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

(In thousands)

      %      %

Vessel operating costs:

                

Americas:

                

Crew costs

 $51,830   41% $63,521   46%

Repair and maintenance

  7,198   6%  12,076   9%

Insurance

  1,672   1%  227  

0

%

Fuel, lube and supplies

  7,564   6%  8,332   6%

Other

  9,421   7%  12,086   9%
   77,685   61%  96,242   70%

Middle East/Asia Pacific:

                

Crew costs

 $39,261   41% $37,164   41%

Repair and maintenance

  10,066   10%  9,409   10%

Insurance

  2,344   2%  1,921   2%

Fuel, lube and supplies

  7,777   8%  9,053   10%

Other

  9,697   10%  7,759   9%
   69,145   71%  65,306   72%

Europe/Mediterranean:

                

Crew costs

 $37,534   45% $51,018   41%

Repair and maintenance

  6,421   7%  13,416   11%

Insurance

  1,596   2%  2,124   2%

Fuel, lube and supplies

  3,324   4%  6,627   5%

Other

  6,557   8%  10,652   9%
   55,432   66%  83,837   68%

West Africa:

                

Crew costs

 $27,999   36% $35,896   28%

Repair and maintenance

  7,528   9%  12,860   10%

Insurance

  1,583   2%  1,857   1%

Fuel, lube and supplies

  10,448   13%  12,347   10%

Other

  18,960   24%  20,851   17%
   66,518   84%  83,811   66%

Total:

                

Crew costs

 $156,624   41% $187,599   39%

Repair and maintenance

  31,213   8%  47,761   10%

Insurance

  7,195   2%  6,129   1%

Fuel, lube and supplies

  29,113   7%  36,359   8%

Other

  44,635   12%  51,348   11%

Total vessel operating costs

  268,780   70%  329,196   69%

35

The following tables present vessel operations general and administrative expenses by segment, the related segment vessel operations general and administrative expenses as a percentage of segment vessel revenues, total vessel operations general and administrative expenses and the related total vessel operations general and administrative expenses as a percentage of total vessel revenues.

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

      %      %

Vessel operations general and administrative expenses:

                

Americas

 $11,968   9% $14,028   10%

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  9,679   10%  9,618   11%

Europe/Mediterranean

  7,577   9%  11,110   9%

West Africa

  11,966   15%  12,751   10%

Total vessel operations general and administrative expenses

 $41,190   11% $47,507   10%

The following tables present depreciation and amortization expense by segments, the related segment depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of segment vessel revenues, total depreciation and amortization expense and the related total depreciation and amortization expense as a percentage of total vessel revenues.

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

      %      %

Depreciation and amortization expense:

                

Americas

 $32,079   25% $27,493   20%

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  24,244   25%  21,440   24%

Europe/Mediterranean

  29,222   35%  30,053   24%

West Africa

  27,787   35%  21,166   17%

Total depreciation and amortization expense

 $113,332   29% $100,152   21%

36

Once the median employee was identified, we calculated that employee’s total annual compensation in accordance with the requirements of the Summary Compensation Table in order to determine the pay ratio provided above. The following tables compare operating incomecompensation paid to our median employee during 2020 consisted solely of base cash wages, so the annual compensation reported for that employee above is the same figure we used to identify that employee as the median employee.
Please be advised that this pay ratio is a reasonable estimate calculated in a manner consistent with SEC rules. Pay ratios that are reported by our peers may not be directly comparable to ours because of differences in the composition of each company’s workforce, as well as the assumptions and other componentsmethodologies used in calculating the pay ratio, as permitted by SEC rules.
DIRECTOR COMPENSATION
2020 DIRECTOR COMPENSATION TABLE
This table reflects all compensation paid to or accrued by each individual who served as a non-management director during fiscal 2020. The compensation of earnings before income taxes,Mr. Kneen, who currently serves as our President and its related percentageChief Executive Officer, is disclosed in the Fiscal 2020 Summary Compensation Table. A description of total revenues.

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

      %      %

Vessel operating profit (loss):

                

Americas

 $4,944   1% $(805)  0%

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  (5,935)  (1)%  (6,044)  (1)%

Europe/Mediterranean

  (8,629)  (2)%  (1,289)  0%

West Africa

  (27,508)  (7)%  8,298   2%
   (37,128)  (9)%  160   0%

Other operating profit

  7,458   2%  6,734   1%
   (29,670)  (7)%  6,894   1%
                 

Corporate expenses (A)

  (35,633)  (9)%  (57,988)  (12)%

Gain on asset dispositions, net

  7,591   2%  2,263   0%

Long-lived asset impairments and other

  (74,109)  (19)%  (37,773)  (8)%
Affiliate credit loss impairment expense  (52,981)  (13)%     0%
Affiliate guarantee obligation  (2,000)  (1)%     0%

Operating loss

  (186,802)  (47)%  (86,604)  (18)%

Foreign exchange loss

  (5,245)  (1)%  (1,269)  0%

Equity in net loss of unconsolidated companies

  164   0%  (3,152)  (1)%
Dividend income from unconsolidated company  17,150   4%     0%

Interest income and other, net

  1,228   0%  6,598   1%

Interest and other debt costs

  (24,156)  (6)%  (29,068)  (6)%

Loss before income taxes

 $(197,661)  (50)% $(113,495)  (23)%

the elements of our director compensation program follows this table.
Name of Director
 
Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash
($)
  
Stock Awards(1)
($)
  
Total
($)
 
Current Directors
            
Darron M. Anderson  14,492   149,335   163,827 
Dick Fagerstal  64,063   168,750   232,813 
Louis A. Raspino  65,462   168,750   234,212 
Larry T. Rigdon  106,645   168,750   275,395 
Kenneth H. Traub  52,813   168,750   221,563 
Lois K. Zabrocky  20,009   168,750   188,759 
Former Directors(2)
            
Randee E. Day  70,363   --   70,363 
Robert P. Tamburrino  68,230   --   68,230 

 

(A)

(1)

IncludedReflects the aggregate grant date fair value of time-based restricted stock units granted to each director during fiscal 2020, computed in corporate expensesaccordance with FASB ASC Topic 718. Each current director except Mr. Anderson received a grant of 27,000 RSUs on July 28, 2020; Mr. Anderson received a pro-rata grant of 21,364 RSUs on September 8, 2020, the effective date of his appointment to our board. These RSU grants, which will vest on the first anniversary of the date of grant, were the only equity awards held by any of our directors at the end of fiscal 2020.

(2)Each of Ms. Randee E. Day and Mr. Robert P. Tamburrino served as a non-management director until the 2020 annual meeting of the stockholders. While neither received an equity grant during fiscal 2020, each did receive a cash payment of $40,685 in lieu of an incremental equity grant for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 are $1.5 million and $12.6 million, respectively, of severance and termination benefits, including acceleration of restricted stock awards, for certain executive officers and other corporate employees.

year. For each, this amount is included in the “Fees Earned or Paid in Cash” column.

Years Ended December 31, 2020 and 2019

Our total revenues for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were $397.0 million and $486.5 million, respectively. The decrease in revenue is primarily due to decreases in our West Africa with 14 less active vessels and Europe/Mediterranean segments, with 13 less active vessels. Both segments were significantly affected by the decrease in demand caused by the pandemic. Overall, we had 32 less average active vessels in the year ended December 31, 2020 than in the year ended December 31, 2019.  Active utilization decreased from 80.4% in 2019 to 77.0% in 2020.  

Vessel operating costs for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were $268.8 million and $329.2 million, respectively. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease in vessel activity, as we have 32 less active vessels in our fleet in the year ended December 31, 2020.

Depreciation and amortization expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 was $116.7 million and $101.9 million, respectively. Depreciation and amortization expense were higher in the current period because of a $18.8 million increase in amortization of deferred drydocking and survey costs partially offset by lower vessel depreciation resulting from the discontinuation of depreciation on vessels classified as held for sale.

General and administrative expenses for the years ended December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 were $73.4 million and $103.7 million, respectively. General and administrative expenses decreased overall in 2020 because of cost cutting measures being implemented during the pandemic and a reduction in one-time severance charges incurred in 2020 compared to 2019.

The net gain on asset dispositions, for the year ended December 31, 2020 are $7.6 million of net gains, primarily from the sale of 56 vessels and other assets. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we recognized net gains of $2.3 million related to the sale of 40 vessels, primarily from our active fleet, and other assets.

During 2020, as discussed previously, we recorded $74.1 million of impairment primarily related to our vessels held for sale and $53.0 million of credit related losses associated with our two joint ventures in Nigeria and Angola.  This compares to $37.8 million of impairment recorded in 2019, primarily related to our initial recognition of assets held for sale and inventory obsolescence.

Interest expense and other debt costs decreased by $4.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared to the year ended December 31, 2019.  This is the result of paying down $97.1 million of our long-term debt primarily in the third and fourth quarters of 2020, offset by the acceleration of recognition of a portion of our deferred debt discount associated with the repaid debt.  In addition, our interest income and other decreased by $5.4 million primarily as a result of lower cash balances in 2020 compared to 2019.

During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recognized foreign exchange losses of $5.2 million and for the year ended December 31, 2019 we recognized losses of $1.3 million. These foreign exchange losses were primarily the result of the revaluation of various foreign currencies where we conduct our business including the Norwegian Kroner, Brazilian-Reais, Angola Kwanza, British Pound and Euro which are denominated balances to our U.S. dollar reporting currency.

37

In addition, our income tax benefit was $1.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2020 compared with an income tax expense of $27.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily due to the reversal of some uncertain tax positions during 2020 as well as an NOL carryback for a tax refund under the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act.

Americas Segment Operations. Vessel revenues in the Americas segment decreased 7.5%, or $10.3 million, during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. The decrease is primarily due to a decrease of five active vessels primarily due to the pandemic. Overall, Americas segment active utilization increased from 84.2% during 2019 to 85.7% during 2020 and average day rates during these same periods increased 7.7%, which was generally due to a greater portion of the segment’s vessels being hired at current prevailing day rates which were higher than those in 2019.    

Operating profit for the Americas segment for the year ended December 31, 2020, was $5.7 million greater than operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2019. Even though revenues decreased from period to period, the higher operating profit was primarily related to a $18.6 million decrease in vessel operating costs resulting from the decrease in vessel activity because of the pandemic and $2.1 million lower general and administrative cost due from ongoing cost saving efforts. These declines were partially offset by a $4.6 million increase in depreciation because of increased amortization of deferred drydock costs.

Middle East/Asia Pacific Segment Operations.  Vessel revenues in the Middle East/Asia Pacific segment increased $6.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. The Middle East/Asia Pacific average day rates were 10.1% higher for 2020 than for 2019. Middle East/Asia Pacific segment active utilization decreased from 79.1% to 76.4% and average active vessel fleet count was flat. Our Middle East/Asia Pacific segment was only marginally affected by COVID-19.

Operating loss for the Middle East/Asia Pacific segment was approximately flat compared with the prior year because increased revenue was offset by higher vessel operating costs and an increase in depreciation resulting from increased amortization of deferred drydock costs.

Europe/Mediterranean Segment Operations. Vessel revenues in the Europe/Mediterranean segment decreased 32.4%, or $40.1 million, during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily due to a 13 active vessel decrease. Europe/Mediterranean segment active utilization increased from 85.8% to 89.8% and average day rates increased by 5.4%. These increases in average day rates are due to the mix of vessels under longer term higher day rate contracts continuing while shorter term and spot contracts were delayed or canceled.  This Segment experienced a significant downturn due to the pandemic.

Operating loss for the Europe/Mediterranean segment increased from $1.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 to $8.6 million in 2020 for the year ended December 31, 2020.  This decrease resulted from lower revenue, which more than offset lower operating costs associated with lower vessel activity and lower general and administrative costs attributable to our ongoing cost reduction efforts.

West Africa Segment Operations.  Vessel revenues in the West Africa segment decreased 37.5%, or $47.3 million, during the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to the year ended December 31, 2019. The West Africa active vessel fleet decreased by 14 vessels during the comparative periods. West Africa segment active utilization decreased from 75.1% to 62.8% and average day rates increased by 3.2%. The decreases in revenue were mainly due to the capacity reduction and utilization decline caused by the negative impact of the pandemic. This segment had the most negative impact from the pandemic because of significant contract cancellations

The operating loss for the West Africa segment was $27.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2020, as compared to $8.3 million operating profit for the year ended December 31, 2019 primarily resulting from decreased revenue and $6.6 million of increased depreciation and amortization resulting from higher amortization of drydock costs. These declines were partially offset by lower operating costs associated with the lower vessel activity and lower general and administrative costs attributable to our ongoing cost reduction efforts.  

38

Vessel Utilization and Average Rates by Segment

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 

SEGMENT STATISTICS:

 

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 
         

Americas fleet:

        

Utilization

  56.2%  54.4%
Active utilization  85.7%  84.2%

Average vessel day rates

  12,702   11,796 

Average total vessels

  49   58 

Average stacked vessels

  (17)  (21)

Average active vessels

  32   37 
         

Middle East/Asia Pacific fleet:

        

Utilization

  66.2%  63.8%
Active utilization  76.4%  79.1%

Average vessel day rates

  8,211   7,458 

Average total vessels

  49   52 

Average stacked vessels

  (7)  (10)

Average active vessels

  42   42 
         

Europe/Mediterranean fleet:

        

Utilization

  51.3%  60.9%
Active utilization  89.8%  85.8%

Average vessel day rates

  12,700   12,052 

Average total vessels

  35   46 

Average stacked vessels

  (15)  (13)

Average active vessels

  20   33 
         

West Africa fleet:

        

Utilization

  37.0%  50.4%
Active utilization  62.8%  75.1%

Average vessel day rates

  9,638   9,338 

Average total vessels

  60   73 

Average stacked vessels

  (24)  (23)

Average active vessels

  36   50 
         

Worldwide fleet:

        

Utilization

  51.8%  56.5%
Active utilization  77.0%  80.4%

Average vessel day rates

  10,563   10,046 

Average total vessels

  193   229 

Average stacked vessels

  (63)  (67)

Average active vessels

  130   162 

Owned or chartered vessels include stacked vessels. We consider a vessel to be stacked if the vessel crew is furloughed or substantially reduced and limited maintenance is being performed on the vessel. We reduce operating costs by stacking vessels when management does not foresee opportunities to profitably or strategically operate the vessels in the near future. Vessels are stacked when market conditions warrant and they are no longer considered stacked when they are returned to active service, sold or otherwise disposed. When economically practical marketing opportunities arise, the stacked vessels can be returned to active service by performing any necessary maintenance on the vessel and either rehiring or returning fleet personnel to operate the vessel. Although not currently fulfilling charters, stacked vessels are considered to be in service and are included in the calculation of our utilization statistics.

We had 35 and 19 stacked vessels in our active fleet as of  December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019, respectively. As of  December 31, 2019, we had 46 total vessels that were classified as assets held for sale. During 2020, we designated an additional 32 assets for disposition and sold 53 vessels that had been designated as held for sale plus an additional three vessels from our active fleet.  At December 31, 2020, 23 vessels remain reclassified as assets held for sale in current assets.

39

Vessel Dispositions

We seek opportunities to sell and/or recycle our older vessels when market conditions warrant and opportunities arise. The majority of our vessels are sold to buyers who do not compete with us in the offshore energy industry. The number of vessels disposed by segment are as follows:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Number of vessels disposed by segment:

        

Americas

  13   21 

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  13   2 

Europe/Mediterranean

  13   3 

West Africa

  17   14 

Total

  56   40 

Vessel Deliveries

We did not build any vessels in the two years ended December 31, 2020.  In the fourth quarter of 2020, we acquired 11 crew boats for $5.3 million which were added to our active fleet in Africa.

 General and Administrative Expenses

Consolidated general and administrative expenses and the related percentage of each component to total revenues are as follows:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

              %

Personnel

 $36,851   9% $50,616   10%

Office and property

  13,483   3%  14,510   3%

Professional services

  15,262   4%  15,909   3%

Other

  6,344   2%  10,066   2%

Restructuring charges (A)

  1,507   0%  12,615   3%
  $73,447   18% $103,716   21%

40

Segment and corporate general and administrative expenses and the related percentage of total general and administrative expenses were as follows:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 
  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

(In thousands)

              %

Vessel operations

 $41,190   56% $47,507   46%

Other operating activities

     0%  1   0%

Corporate

  30,750   42%  43,593   42%

Restructuring charges (A)

  1,507   2%  12,615   12%
  $73,447   100% $103,716   100%

(A)

Restructuring charges for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 include $1.5 million and $12.6 million, respectively, of severance and termination benefits, including acceleration of restricted stock awards, for certain executive officers and other corporate employees.

General and administrative expenses for the year ended December 31, 2020 have decreased as compared to the comparable prior year primarily as a result of our continuing efforts to reduce overhead costs due to the downturn in the offshore services market.

Liquidity, Capital Resources and Other Matters

Availability of Cash

As of  December 31, 2020, we had 155.2 million in cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash), including amounts held by foreign subsidiaries, the majority of which is available to us without adverse tax consequences. Included in foreign subsidiary cash are balances held in U.S. dollars and foreign currencies that await repatriation due to various currency conversion and repatriation constraints, partner and tax related matters, prior to the cash being made available for remittance to our domestic accounts. We currently intend that earnings by foreign subsidiaries will be indefinitely reinvested in foreign jurisdictions in order to fund strategic initiatives (such as investment, expansion and acquisitions), fund working capital requirements and repay debt (both third-party and intercompany) of our foreign subsidiaries in the normal course of business. Moreover, we do not currently intend to repatriate earnings of our foreign subsidiaries to the U. S. because cash generated from our domestic businesses and the repayment of intercompany liabilities from foreign subsidiaries are currently deemed to be sufficient to fund the cash needs of our operations in the U. S.

Our objective in financing our business is to maintain and preserve adequate financial resources and sufficient levels of liquidity. We do not have a revolving credit facility. Cash and cash equivalents and future net cash provided by operating activities provide us, in our opinion, with sufficient liquidity to meet our liquidity requirements.

Indebtedness

As of December 31, 2020, we had $198.0 million of long -term debt on our consolidated balance sheet of which $27.8 million is due within one year.  Of this amount, our Secured Notes total $147.0 million, which is due in August 2022.  The Secured Notes have a quarterly minimum trailing year interest coverage requirement that began June 30, 2019. Compliance with this covenant has been waived from April 2021 through December 31, 2021. Minimum liquidity requirements and other covenants are set forth in the Indenture.  In addition, we have $50.9 million of long-term debt in a subsidiary that is collateralized by certain of the subsidiary’s vessels.  This debt has similar covenants as the Secured Notes. We believe that our $155.2 million in cash on hand, plus cash generated from our operations and asset sales in 2021 will be sufficient to meet our debt obligations in 2021. Refer to Note (4) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for further details on our indebtedness.

We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Share Repurchases

No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.  Please refer to Note (12) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

41

Dividends

There were no dividends declared during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.  Please refer to Note (11) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Operating Activities

Net cash provided by or used in operating activities for any period will fluctuate according to the level of business activity for the applicable period.

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities is as follows:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Net loss

 $(196,696) $(141,219)

Depreciation and amortization

  73,030   77,045 

Amortization of deferred drydocking and survey costs

  43,679   24,886 

Amortization of debt premiums and discounts

  3,961   (4,877)

Provision for deferred income taxes

  1,224   672 

Gain on asset dispositions, net

  (7,591)  (2,263)
Affiliate credit loss impairment expense  52,981    
Affiliate guarantee obligation  2,000    

Long-lived asset impairments

  74,109   37,773 

Compensation expense - stock based

  5,117   19,603 

Deferred drydocking and survey costs

  (33,271)  (70,437)

Changes in operating assets and liabilities

  (26,506)  4,162 

Changes in due to/from affiliate, net

  11,949   22,193 

Changes in investments in, at equity, and advances to unconsolidated companies

     1,039 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

 $3,986  $(31,423)

Net cash providedby operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2020, of $4.0 million reflects a net loss of $196.7 million, non-cash impairments of $129.1 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $116.7 million, a net gain on asset dispositions of $7.6 million, and stock-based compensation expense of $5.1 million. Changes in operating assets and liabilities used $26.5 million in cash while amounts due to/from affiliates provided $11.9 million in cash.  We paid $33.3 million for regulatory drydocks in 2020.

Net cash used by operating activities for the year ended December 31, 2019, of $31.4 million reflects a net loss of $141.2 million, non-cash asset impairments of $37.8 million, non-cash depreciation and amortization of $101.9 million, a net gain on asset dispositions of $2.3 million and stock-based compensation expense of $19.6 million. We paid out $70.4 million for regulatory drydocks, including reactivations, in 2019. Changes in investments in, at equity, and advances to unconsolidated companies decreased by $1.0 million, primarily reflecting foreign exchange losses recognized by our 49% owned Sonatide joint venture.

Investing Activities

Net cash provided by investing activities is as follows:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Proceeds from sales of assets

 $38,296  $28,847 

Additions to properties and equipment

  (14,900)  (17,998)

Net cash provided by investing activities

 $23,396  $10,849 

Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020, was $23.4 million, reflecting proceeds from the sale of assets of $38.3 million related to the disposal of 56 vessels, 25 of which were recycled.  Additions to property and equipment were comprised of $14.9 million, primarily for the purchase of eleven crew vessels, upgrades to our existing fleet and continued enhancements to our current enterprise software system.

Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019, was $10.8 million, reflecting the receipt of proceeds from the sale of assets of $28.8 million related to the disposal of 40 vessels, 22 of which were recycled. Additions to property and equipment were comprised of $18.0 million, primarily for upgrades to our existing fleet and the implementation of a new enterprise software system.

42

Financing Activities

Net cash used in financing activities is as follows:

  

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Principal payments on long-term debt

 $(98,080) $(133,693)

Premiums paid for redemption of secured notes

     (11,402)

Taxes paid on share-based awards

  (828)  (4,467)
Other  (857)   

Net cash used in financing activities

 $(99,765) $(149,562)

Financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2020, used $99.8 million of cash, as a result of the repayment of $76.2 million of our secured notes in open market purchases and a voluntary tender offer.   Financing activities also included $21.9 million of scheduled semiannual payments and additional prepayments on the TROMS offshore debt.

Financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2019, used $149.6 million of cash, as a result of the repayment of the $125.0 million of our secured notes and a $11.4 million redemption premium and consent fee, pursuant to a tender offer associated with the repayment of secured notes. Financing activities also included $8.7 million of scheduled semiannual payments on the TROMS offshore debt.

Legal Proceedings

Various legal proceedings and claims are outstanding which arose in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows. Information related to various commitments and contingencies, including legal proceedings, is disclosed in Note (12) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

43

Contractual Obligations and Contingent Commitments

Contractual Obligations

The following table summarizes our consolidated contractual obligations as of December 31, 2020 and the effect such obligations, inclusive of interest costs, are expected to have on our liquidity and cash flows in future periods.

(In thousands)

 

Payments Due by Fiscal Year

 
                          

More

 
                          

Than

 
  

Total

  

2021

  

2022

  

2023

  

2024

  

2025

  

5 Years

 

Long-term debt obligations:

                            

Secured notes - principal

 $147,049      147,049             

Secured notes - interest

  18,626   11,764   6,862             

Troms Offshore debt - principal

  50,926   27,796   4,983   4,983   4,514   4,044   4,606 

Troms Offshore debt - interest

  5,104   1,896   1,079   828   577   369   355 

Total long-term debt obligations:

  221,705   41,456   159,973   5,811   5,091   4,413   4,961 

Operating lease obligations:

                            

Operating leases

  4,222   1,318   1,094   717   273   273   547 

Total operating lease obligations:

  4,222   1,318   1,094   717   273   273   547 

Other long-term obligations:

                            

Uncertain tax positions (A)

  35,305   5,870   7,206   4,025   2,260   2,771   13,173 

Pension obligations

  55,523   5,860   5,833   5,777   5,762   5,686   26,605 

Total other long-term obligations:

  90,828   11,730   13,039   9,802   8,022   8,457   39,778 

Total obligations

 $316,755   54,504   174,106   16,330   13,386   13,143   45,286 

(A)

These amounts represent the liability for unrecognized tax benefits under FASB Interpretation No. 48. The estimated income tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions will be settled as a result of expiring statutes, audit activity, competent authority proceedings related to transfer pricing, or final decisions in matters that are the subject of litigation in various taxing jurisdictions in which we operate. The timing of any particular settlement will depend on the length of the tax audit and related appeals process, if any, or an expiration of a statute. If a liability is settled due to a statute expiring or a favorable audit result, the settlement of the tax liability would not result in a cash payment.

Letters of Credit and Surety Bonds

In the ordinary course of business, we had other commitments that we are contractually obligated to fulfill with cash should the obligations be called. These obligations include standby letters of credit, surety bonds and performance bonds that guarantee our performance as it relates to our vessel contracts, insurance, customs and other obligations in various jurisdictions. While these obligations are not normally called, the obligation could be called by the beneficiaries at any time before the expiration date should we breach certain contractual and/or performance or payment obligations. As of December 31, 2020, we had approximately $40.5 million of outstanding standby letters of credit, surety bonds and performance bonds, geographically concentrated in Mexico, Brazil and Nigeria.

Application of Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates

The preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosures and disclosures of any contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. We evaluate the reasonableness of these estimates and assumptions continually based onuse a combination of historical experiencecash and other assumptionsequity-based compensation to provide competitive compensation for our non-management directors and information that comes to enable them to meet their stock ownership guidelines. Our compensation committee is responsible for overseeing our attention that may vary the outlook for the future. Estimatesoutside director compensation program and assumptions about future events and their effects are subject to uncertainty, and accordingly, these estimates may change as new events occur, as more experience is acquired, as additional information is obtained and as the business environment in which we operate changes. As a result, actual results may differ from estimates under different assumptions.

The Nature of Operations and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, as described in Note (1) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, should be read in conjunction with this Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations. We have defined a critical accounting estimate as one that is importantrecommending any changes to the portrayal of our financial condition or results of operations and requires us to make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates about matters that are uncertain. We believe the following critical accounting policies that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements are described below. There are other items within our consolidated financial statements that require estimation and judgment, but they are not deemed critical as defined above.

44

Receivables and Allowancefull board for Credit Losses

In the normal course of business, we extend credit to our customers on a short-term basis. Our principal customers are major oil and natural gas exploration, field development and production companies. We routinely review and evaluate our accounts receivable balances for collectability. The determination of the collectability of amounts due from our customers requires us to use estimates and make judgments regarding future events and trends, including monitoring our customers’ payment history and current credit worthiness to determine that collectability is reasonably assured, as well as consideration of the overall business climate inaction. Meridian Compensation Partners, LLC (“Meridian”), which our customers operate. Expected credit losses are recorded on the initial recognition of our primary financial assets, which are trade accounts receivable and contract assets. We also have net receivable balances related to joint ventures in which we own less than 50%. We review and evaluate these receivables for collectability in a similar manner as we evaluate trade receivables. We believe that our allowance for credit losses is adequate to cover potential bad debt losses under current conditions; however, uncertainties regarding changes in the financial condition of our customers, either adverse or positive, could impact the amount and timing of any additional provisions for credit losses that may be required.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review the vessels in our active fleet for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset group are compared with the carrying amount of the asset group to determine if a write-down may be required. With respect to vessels that are expected to remain in active service, we group together for impairment testing purposes vessels with similar operating and marketing characteristics. Due in part to the modernization of our fleet more newer vessels are being stacked and are expected to return to active service. Stacked vessels expected to return to active service are generally newer vessels, have similar capabilities and likelihood of future active service as other currently operating vessels, are generally current with classification societies in regard to their regulatory certification status, and are being actively marketed. Stacked vessels expected to return to active service are evaluated for impairment as part of their assigned active asset group and not individually.

We estimate cash flows based upon historical data adjusted for our best estimate of expected future market performance, which, in turn, is based on industry trends. The primary estimates and assumptions used in reviewing active vessel groups for impairment and estimating undiscounted cash flows include utilization rates, average day rates and average daily operating expenses. These estimates are made based on recent actual trends in utilization, day rates and operating costs and reflect management’s best estimate of expected market conditions during the period of future cash flows. These assumptions and estimates have changed considerably as market conditions have changed, and they are reasonably likely to continue to change as market conditions change in the future. Although we believe our assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce materially different results. Management estimates may vary considerably from actual outcomes due to future adverse market conditions or poor operating results that could result in the inability to recover the current carrying value of an asset group, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. As our fleet continues to age, management closely monitors the estimates and assumptions used in the impairment analysis in order to properly identify evolving trends and changes in market conditions that could impact the results of the impairment evaluation.

If an asset group fails the undiscounted cash flow test, we estimate the fair value of each asset group and compare such estimated fair value to the carrying value of each asset group in order to determine if impairment exists.

Management estimates the fair value of each vessel in an asset group considered Level 3, as defined by ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, by considering items such as the vessel’s age, length of time stacked, likelihood of a return to active service, actual recent sales of similar vessels, among others. Third party appraisals, broker values or internal valuations based on recent sale activity are utilized for vessels expected to be sold as an operating vessel. We leverage information for vessels in a similar class, similar age, or similar specification to be used as a basis of fair value for vessels expected to be sold. Internal valuations are also prepared for vessels expected to be sold for recycling utilizing an estimated recycle value per lightweight ton based on the region of the vessel is located and the weight of the vessel and recent recycle activity. We record an impairment charge when the carrying value of an asset group exceeds its estimated fair value. In previous years, we sought opportunities to dispose of our older vessels when market conditions warranted and opportunities would arise. As a result, vessel dispositions would vary from year to year, and gains (losses) on sales of assets would also fluctuate significantly from period to period. The majority of our vessels were sold to buyers with whom we do not compete in the offshore energy industry.  We continue to employ that strategy, but to a lesser extent.  When circumstances warrant we review our fleet and make decisions remove assets that are not considered to be part of our long-term plans.  In these circumstance we will reclassify the identified vessels as held for sale and, if necessary, we will revalue these vessels to net realizable value.  We consider the valuation approach for our assets held for sale to be a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the level of estimation involved in valuing assets to be recycled or sold.  We determine the fair value of the vessels held for sale using two methodologies depending on the vessel and on our planned method of disposition.  We designated certain vessels to be recycled and valued those vessels using recycling yard pricing schedules based on dollars per ton. We generally value vessels that will be sold rather than recycled at the midpoint of a value range based on sales agreements or using comparative sales in the marketplace.

45

Income Taxes  

The asset-liability method is used for determining our income tax provisions, under which current and deferred tax liabilities and assets are recorded in accordance with enacted tax laws and rates. Under this method, the amounts of deferred tax liabilities and assets at the end of each period are determined using the tax rate expected to be in effect when taxes are actually paid or recovered. In addition, we determine our effective tax rate by estimating our permanent differences resulting from differing treatment of items for tax and accounting purposes.

As a global company, we are subject to the jurisdiction of taxing authorities in the United States and by the respective tax agencies in the countries in which we operate internationally, as well as to tax agreements and treaties among these governments. Our operations in these different jurisdictions are taxed on various bases: actual income before taxes, deemed profits (which are generally determined using a percentage of revenue rather than profits) and withholding taxes based on revenue. Determination of taxable income in any tax jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations and the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events such as the amount, timing and character of deductions, permissible revenue recognition methods under the tax law and the sources and character of income and tax credits. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes that we provide during any given year. We are periodically audited by various taxing authorities in the United States and by the respective tax agencies in the countries in which we operate internationally. The tax audits generally include questions regarding the calculation of taxable income. Audit adjustments affecting permanent differences could have an impact on our effective tax rate.

The carrying value of our net deferred tax assets is based on our present belief that we will be unable to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions to utilize such deferred tax assets, based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and related assumptions change in the future, we may be required to adjust valuation allowances against our deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax expense or benefit in our consolidated statement of operations. Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets and assesses the need for changes to valuation allowances on a quarterly basis. While we have considered future taxable income and ongoing prudent and feasible tax planning strategies in assessing the present need for a valuation allowance, in the event we were to determine that we would be able to realize our deferred tax assets in the future in excess of our net recorded amount, an adjustment to the valuation allowance would increase income in the period such determination was made. Should we determine that we would not be able to realize all or part of our net deferred tax asset in the future, an adjustment to the deferred tax asset would be charged to income in the period such determination was made.

Deferred taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries and business ventures because we consider those earnings to be permanently invested abroad.

We record uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions would be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that was more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The recognition and measurement of tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions in any tax jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations as well as the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes during any given year.

New Accounting Pronouncements

For information regarding the effect of new accounting pronouncements, refer to Note (1) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Market risk refers to the potential losses arising from changes in interest rates, foreign currency fluctuations and exchange rates, equity prices and commodity prices including the correlation among these factors and their volatility. We are primarily exposed to interest rate risk and foreign currency fluctuations and exchange risk. We enter into derivative instruments only to the extent considered necessary to meet our risk management objectives and do not use derivative contracts for speculative purposes.

46

Interest Rate Risk and Indebtedness

Changes in interest rates may result in changes in the fair market value of our financial instruments, interest income and interest expense. Our financial instruments that are exposed to interest rate risk are our cash equivalents. Due to the short duration and conservative nature of the cash equivalent investment portfolio, we do not expect any material loss with respect to our investments. The book value for cash equivalents is considered to be representative of its fair value.

Secured Notes

Please refer to Note (4) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K for a discussion on our outstanding debt.

Because the existing terms on secured notes outstanding at December 31, 2020, bear interest at fixed rates, interest expense would not be impacted by changes in market interest rates. The following table discloses how the estimated fair value of our respective senior notes, as of December 31, 2020, would change with a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in market interest rates.

  

Outstanding

  

Estimated

  

100 Basis

  

100 Basis

 

(In thousands)

 

Value

  

Fair Value

  

Point Increase

  

Point Decrease

 

Total

 $147,049   141,382   139,366   143,433 

Troms Offshore Debt

Troms Offshore had outstanding $176.1 million of NOK denominated debt and $30.4 million of U.S. denominated fixed rate debt outstanding at December 31, 2020. The following table discloses how the estimated fair value of the fixed rate Troms Offshore notes, as of December 31, 2020, would change with a 100 basis-point increase or decrease in market interest rates: 

  

Outstanding

  

Estimated

  

100 Basis

  

100 Basis

 

(In thousands)

 

Value

  

Fair Value

  

Point Increase

  

Point Decrease

 

Total

 $50,926   51,557   50,817   52,328 

Foreign Exchange Risk

Our financial instruments that can be affected by foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations consist primarily of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables, trade payables and debt denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar. We periodically enter into spot and forward derivative financial instruments as a hedge against foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities, currency commitments, or to lock in desired interest rates. Spot derivative financial instruments are short-term in nature and settle within two business days. The fair value of spot derivatives approximates the carrying value due to the short-term nature of this instrument, and as a result, no gains or losses are recognized. We have no derivative instruments as of December 31, 2020. Forward derivative financial instruments are generally longer-term in nature but generally do not exceed one year. The accounting for gains or losses on forward contracts is dependent on the nature of the risk being hedged and the effectiveness of the hedge.

Other

Due to our international operations, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and exchange rate risks on all charter hire contracts denominated in foreign currencies. For some of our international contracts, a portion of the revenue and local expenses are incurred in local currencies with the result that we are at risk of changes in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge against any foreign currency rate fluctuations associated with foreign currency contracts that arise in the normal course of business, which exposes us to the risk of exchange rate losses. To minimize the financial impact of these items we attempt to contract a significant majority of our services in U.S. dollars. In addition, we attempt to minimize the financial impact of these risks by matching the currency of our operating costs with the currency of the revenue streams when considered appropriate. We continually monitor the currency exchange risks associated with all contracts not denominated in U.S. dollars.

47

Discussions related to our joint venture operations are disclosed in Note (5) of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

48

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

TIDEWATER INC.

Report on Form 10-K

Items 8, 15(a), and 15(c)

Index to Financial Statements and Schedule

Financial Statements

Page

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm50

Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019

53

Consolidated Statements of Operations, years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

54

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss, years ended December 31, 2020, 2019, and 2018

55

Consolidated Statements of Equity, years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

56

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018

57

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

58

Financial Statement Schedule

II.    Tidewater Inc. and Subsidiaries Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

91

All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or the related notes.

49

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM  

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries 

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries   (the "Company") as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, and the related notes and the schedule listed in the Index at Item 15 (collectively referred to as the "financial statements"). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2020 and 2019, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2020, in conformity with  accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated March 4, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

50

Table of Contents                         

Income Taxes – Accounting for Uncertain Tax Positions – Refer to Notes 1 and 6 to the consolidated financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company is subject to the jurisdiction of taxing authorities in the United States and by the respective international tax agencies in the countries in which the Company operates. The Company’s operations in these different jurisdictions are taxed on various bases: actual income before taxes, deemed profits (which are generally determined using a percentage of revenue rather than profits), and withholding taxes based on revenue.   The Company records uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) the Company determines whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions would be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that met the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, the Company recognizes the largest amount of tax benefit that was more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority.

The recognition and measurement of tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions in any tax jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations as well as the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or the Company’s level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes during any given year. Given the significance of the tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions, multiple jurisdictions in which the Company files its tax returns, and the complexity in determining the tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions, the tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions is considered a critical estimate that involved especially challenging, subjective, or complex auditor judgment.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions included the following, among others:

We evaluated the appropriateness and consistency of management’s methods and assumptions used in the identification, recognition, measurement, and disclosure of uncertain tax positions, which included testing the effectiveness of the related internal controls.

We evaluated the completeness of the Company’s recorded uncertain tax positions by evaluating income tax positions that may give rise to unrecognized tax benefits and performing inquiries with management regarding the nature and impacts of the associated financial activity leading to an income tax position, assessed prior year tax return filings to identify potential unrecorded uncertain tax positions, and considered the activities within the Company’s international operating areas that may give rise to unrecognized tax benefits.

We read and evaluated management’s documentation, including relevant information obtained by management from its external tax specialists, that detailed the basis of the uncertain tax positions.

With the assistance of our local jurisdiction tax specialists in Mexico, Portugal, and Saudi Arabia, we evaluated the reasonableness of the Company’s accounting for certain uncertain tax positions by evaluating the technical merits of the methods, assumptions, and judgments used by management to determine the future resolution of the tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions.

For those uncertain tax positions that had not been effectively settled, we evaluated whether management had appropriately considered new information that could significantly change the recognition, measurement or disclosure of the uncertain tax positions.

We considered evidence obtained in other areas of the audit to determine if the uncertain tax positions were appropriate.

Asset Impairments – Refer to Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company reviews the vessels in its fleet for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable.

When the Company identifies an indicator of impairment, the Company will perform an evaluation comparing the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset group with the carrying amount of the asset group to determine if a write-down may be required. The primary estimates and assumptions used in reviewing active vessel groups for impairment and estimating undiscounted cash flows include utilization rates, average day rates and average daily operating expenses. These estimates are based on recent actual trends in utilization, day rates and operating costs for vessels in similar classes and operating regions. The trends are adjusted to reflect management’s best estimate of expected market conditions during the period of future cash flows.

51

Table of Contents                                

We identified impairment of vessels as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to identify indicators of impairment and develop assumptions utilized in the impairment model, as well as the value to apply to vessels expected to be sold or recycled. This requires a high degree of auditor judgment and increased extent of effort related to evaluating indicators of impairment and forecast assumptions.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the Company’s vessel impairment analysis included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of relevant controls over management’s identification of impairment indicators and the review of future cash flow assumptions utilized in the impairment model. 

We evaluated the Company’s identification of impairment indicators and future cash flow assumptions utilized in the vessel impairment analysis by:

o

Corroborating information used through independent inquiries of marketing and operations personnel. 

o

Considering industry and analysts reports and the impact of macroeconomic factors, such as future oil and gas prices, on the Company’s process for identifying indicators of impairment and future cash flow assumptions.

o

Comparing future cash flow assumptions, including day rate and utilization, against historical performance for periods with comparable market environment characteristics.

Assets Held for Sale – Refer to Notes 1 and 8 to the consolidated financial statements

Critical Audit Matter Description

The Company reviews its vessels classified as held for sale on a quarterly basis to ensure the vessels meet criteria required for held for sale classification and revalues the vessels to  determine whether any fair value adjustments are required to measure the vessels at the lower of fair value less cost to sell or carrying value prior to classification as held for sale.

In order to estimate the fair value less cost to sell for the vessels, the Company prepares internal valuations based on recent sales activities for vessels expected to be sold as an operating vessel. The Company leverages information for vessels in a similar class, similar age, or similar specification to be used as a basis of fair value. Internal valuations are also prepared for vessels expected to be recycled utilizing an estimated value per lightweight ton based on the region of the vessel is located, the weight of the vessel and recent recycling activity.

We identified valuation of vessels held for sale as a critical audit matter because of the significant judgments made by management to apply to vessels expected to be sold or recycled. This requires a high degree of auditor judgment, including the involvement of fair value specialists, and increased extent of effort related to analyzing the selected value.

How the Critical Audit Matter Was Addressed in the Audit

Our audit procedures related to the valuation of the Company’s vessels held for sale included the following, among others:

We tested the effectiveness of relevant controls over management’s assessment of held for sale classification criteria and assumptions of fair value, such as estimated value per lightweight ton and recent sales and recycling activity.  

With the assistance of our internal valuation specialists, we tested the Company’s estimate of fair value less cost to sell by:

o

Evaluating whether comparable sales were appropriately utilized to estimate the fair value of the vessels expected to be sold,

o

Testing the source information underlying management’s valuation assumptions, including vessel specifications and estimated recycling prices, and 

o

Testing the market data for the specified vessels by:

§

Researching comparable sales for vessels with similar specifications,

§

Utilizing third-party data to source comparable vessels, and

§

Comparing the relevant data provided by management to our independently researched market data and found all vessels lied within our range.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP                          

Houston, Texas

March 4, 2021  

We have served as the Company's auditor since 2004.

52

director compensation to help ensure that our director pay levels and program components are in line with competitive market practice.
 

TIDEWATER INC.Director Fees

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(In thousands, except share. For fiscal 2020, the cash and par value data)

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

ASSETS

 

2020

  

2019

 

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

 $149,933  $218,290 

Restricted cash

  2,079   5,755 

Trade and other receivables, less allowance for credit losses of $1,516 as of December 31, 2020 and less allowance for doubtful accounts of $70 as of December 31, 2019

  112,623   110,180 

Due from affiliate, less allowance for credit losses of $71,800 as of December 31, 2020 and less due from affiliate allowance of $20,083 as of December 31, 2019

  62,050   125,972 

Marine operating supplies

  15,876   21,856 

Assets held for sale

  34,396   39,287 

Prepaid expenses and other current assets

  11,692   15,956 

Total current assets

  388,649   537,296 

Net properties and equipment

  780,318   938,961 

Deferred drydocking and survey costs

  56,468   66,936 

Other assets

  25,742   36,335 

Total assets

  1,251,177   1,579,528 
         

LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY

        

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

 $16,981  $27,501 

Accrued expenses

  52,422   74,000 

Due to affiliate

  53,194   50,186 

Current portion of long-term debt

  27,797   9,890 

Other current liabilities

  32,785   24,100 

Total current liabilities

  183,179   185,677 

Long-term debt

  164,934   279,044 

Other liabilities

  79,792   98,397 
         

Commitments and contingencies

          
         

Equity:

        

Common stock of $0.001 par value, 125,000,000 shares authorized,40,704,984 and 39,941,327 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively

  41   40 

Additional paid-in capital

  1,371,809   1,367,521 

Accumulated deficit

  (548,931)  (352,526)

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

  (804)  (236)

Total stockholders’ equity

  822,115   1,014,799 

Noncontrolling interests

  1,157   1,611 

Total equity

  823,272   1,016,410 

Total liabilities and equity

 $1,251,177  $1,579,528 

See accompanying Notesequity-based compensation payable to Consolidated Financial Statements.

53our non-management directors was as follows:

TIDEWATER INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Revenues:

            

Vessel revenues

 $386,174  $477,015  $397,206 

Other operating revenues

  10,864   9,534   9,314 
   397,038   486,549   406,520 

Costs and expenses:

            

Vessel operating costs

  268,780   329,196   269,580 

Costs of other operating revenues

  3,405   2,800   5,530 

General and administrative

  73,447   103,716   110,023 

Depreciation and amortization

  116,709   101,931   58,293 

Gain on asset dispositions, net

  (7,591)  (2,263)  (10,624)

Impairment of due from affiliate

  0   0   20,083 
Affiliate credit loss impairment expense  52,981   0   0 
Affiliate guarantee obligation  2,000   0   0 

Long-lived asset impairments and other

  74,109   37,773   61,132 
   583,840   573,153   514,017 

Operating loss

  (186,802)  (86,604)  (107,497)

Other income (expense):

            

Foreign exchange gain (loss)

  (5,245)  (1,269)  106 

Equity in net losses of unconsolidated companies

  164   (3,152)  (18,864)
Dividend income from unconsolidated company  17,150   0   0 

Interest income and other, net

  1,228   6,598   11,294 

Loss on early extinguishment of debt

  0   0   (8,119)

Interest and other debt costs, net

  (24,156)  (29,068)  (30,439)
   (10,859)  (26,891)  (46,022)

Loss before income taxes

  (197,661)  (113,495)  (153,519)

Income tax (benefit) expense

  (965)  27,724   18,252 

Net loss

 $(196,696) $(141,219) $(171,771)

Less: Net income (losses) attributable to noncontrolling interests

  (454)  524   (254)

Net loss attributable to Tidewater Inc.

 $(196,242) $(141,743) $(171,517)
Basic loss per common share  (4.86)  (3.71)  (6.45)
Diluted loss per common share  (4.86)  (3.71)  (6.45)

Weighted average common shares outstanding

  40,354,638   38,204,934   26,589,883 

Dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock

  0   0   0 

Adjusted weighted average common shares

  40,354,638   38,204,934   26,589,883 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

54

TIDEWATER INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Net loss

 $(196,696) $(141,219) $(171,771)

Other comprehensive income (loss):

            

Unrealized gains (losses) on available for sale securities, net of tax of $0, $0, and $0, respectively

  0   0   (256)

Change in supplemental executive retirement plan pension liability, net of tax of $0, $0, and $0, respectively

  (2,309)  (2,121)  2,214 

Change in pension plan minimum liability, net of tax of $0, $0, and $0, respectively

  1,741   (309)  1,919 

Change in other benefit plan minimum liability, net of tax of $0, $0 and $0, respectively

  0   0   (1,536)

Total comprehensive loss

 $(197,264) $(143,649) $(169,430)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

55

TIDEWATER INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY

              

Accumulated

         
      

Additional

      

other

         
  

Common

  

paid-in

  

Accumulated

  

comprehensive

  

Noncontrolling

     

(In thousands)

 

stock

  

capital

  

deficit

  

income (loss)

  

interest

  

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2017

 $22   1,059,120   (39,266)  (147)  2,215   1,021,944 

Total comprehensive loss

  0   0   (171,517)  2,341   (254)  (169,430)

Issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants

  6   (3)  0   0   0   3 

Issuance of common stock for GulfMark business combination

  9   285,483   0   0   0   285,492 

Amortization of restricted stock units

  0   8,914   0   0   0   8,914 

Cash paid to noncontrolling interests

  0   (1,126)  0   0   (874)  (2,000)

Balance at December 31, 2018

  37   1,352,388   (210,783)  2,194   1,087   1,144,923 

Total comprehensive loss

  0   0   (141,743)  (2,430)  524   (143,649)

Issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants

  3   (3)  0   0   0   0 

Amortization of restricted stock units

  0   15,136   0   0   0   15,136 

Balance at December 31, 2019

  40   1,367,521   (352,526)  (236)  1,611   1,016,410 

Total comprehensive loss

  0   0   (196,242)  (568)  (454)  (197,264)

Adoption of credit loss accounting standard

  0   0   (163)  0   0   (163)

Issuance of common stock from exercise of warrants

  1   (1)  0   0   0   0 

Amortization of restricted stock units

  0   4,289   0   0   0   4,289 

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $41   1,371,809   (548,931)  (804)  1,157   823,272 

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

56

TIDEWATER INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Operating activities:

            

Net loss

 $(196,696) $(141,219) $(171,771)

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities:

            

Depreciation and amortization

  73,030   77,045   51,332 

Amortization of deferred drydocking and survey costs

  43,679   24,886   6,961 

Amortization of debt premiums and discounts

  3,961   (4,877)  (1,856)

Provision for deferred income taxes

  1,224   672   572 

Gain on asset dispositions, net

  (7,591)  (2,263)  (10,624)

Impairment of due from affiliate

  0   0   20,083 
Affiliate credit loss impairment expense  52,981   0   0 
Affiliate guarantee obligation  2,000   0   0 

Long-lived asset impairments and other

  74,109   37,773   61,132 

Loss on debt extinguishment

  0   0   8,119 

Changes in investments in unconsolidated companies

  0   1,039   28,177 

Stock-based compensation expense

  5,117   19,603   13,406 

Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net:

            

Trade and other receivables

  (2,606)  1,086   9,088 

Changes in due to/from affiliate, net

  11,949   22,193   28,644 

Marine operating supplies

  2,588   2,425   (1,955)

Other current assets

  4,264   (4,120)  10,893 

Accounts payable

  (10,520)  (4,438)  (15,174)

Accrued expenses

  (17,551)  8,189   (13,348)

Other current liabilities

  8,685   3,008   1,332 

Other liabilities and deferred credits

  (20,002)  1,270   (2,023)

Deferred drydocking and survey costs

  (33,271)  (70,437)  (25,968)

Other, net

  8,636   (3,258)  6,921 

Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities

  3,986   (31,423)  3,941 

Cash flows from investing activities:

            

Proceeds from sales of assets

  38,296   28,847   46,115 

Additions to properties and equipment

  (14,900)  (17,998)  (21,391)

Cash and cash equivalents from stock-based merger

  0   0   43,806 

Net cash provided by investing activities

  23,396   10,849   68,530 

Cash flows from financing activities:

            

Principal payments on long-term debt

  (98,080)  (133,693)  (105,169)

Premium paid for redemption of secured notes

  0   (11,402)  0 

Cash payments to General Unsecured Creditors

  0   0   (8,377)

Loss on debt extinguishment

  0   0   (8,119)

Cash received for issuance of common stock

  0   0   3 

Tax on share-based award

  (828)  (4,467)  (4,400)

Other

  (857)  0   (2,000)

Net cash used in financing activities

  (99,765)  (149,562)  (128,062)

Net change in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash

  (72,383)  (170,136)  (55,591)

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period

  227,608   397,744   453,335 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period

 $155,225  $227,608  $397,744 

Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:

            

Cash paid during the year for:

            

Interest, net of amounts capitalized

 $21,235  $32,687  $32,326 

Income taxes

 $13,018  $14,378  $16,828 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash investing activities:

            

Merger with GulfMark

 $0  $0  $285,492 

Supplemental disclosure of noncash financing activities:

            

Common stock issued for GulfMark merger

 $0  $0  $285,492 

Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at December 31, 2020 and 2019 includes $3.2 million and $3.6 million, respectively, in long-term restricted cash.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.

57

 

(1)Fee Type

NATURE OF OPERATIONS AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Amount

Nature of Operations

We provide offshore service vessels and marine support services to the global offshore energy industry through the operation of a diversified fleet of offshore marine service vessels. Our revenues, net earnings and cash flows from operations are dependent upon the activity level of the vessel fleet (utilization) and the price we are able to charge for these services (day-rate). The level of our business activity is driven by the amount of installed offshore oil and gas production facilities, the level of offshore drilling and exploration activity, and the general level of offshore construction projects such as pipeline and windfarm construction and support. Our customers’ offshore activity, in turn, is dependent on crude oil and natural gas prices, which fluctuate depending on the respective levels of supply and demand for crude oil and natural gas and the future outlook for such levels.

Unless otherwise required by the context, the terms “we”, “us”, “our” and “company” as used herein refer to Tidewater Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries and predecessors.

Principles of Consolidation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Tidewater Inc. and its subsidiaries. Intercompany balances and transactions are eliminated in consolidation.

Business Combination

On November 15, 2018 (the Merger Date) we completed our business combination with GulfMark Offshore, Inc. (GulfMark). Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination have been recorded at their estimated fair values as of the Merger Date under the acquisition method of accounting. The estimated fair values of certain assets and liabilities require judgments and assumptions. Refer to Note (2), for further details on the impact of this business combination on our consolidated financial statements.

Use of Estimates in Preparation of Financial Statements

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the recorded amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The accompanying consolidated financial statements include estimates for allowance for credit losses, useful lives of property and equipment, income tax provisions, impairments, commitments and contingencies and certain accrued liabilities. We evaluate our estimates and assumptions on an ongoing basis based on a combination of historical information and various other assumptions that are considered reasonable under the particular circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. These accounting policies involve judgment and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions or if different assumptions had been used and, as such, actual results may differ from these estimates.

Cash Equivalents

We consider all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Restricted Cash

We consider cash as restricted when there are contractual agreements that govern the use or withdrawal of the funds.

Marine Operating Supplies

Marine operating supplies, which consist primarily of operating parts and supplies for our vessels as well as fuel, are stated at the lower of weighted-average cost or net realizable value.

58

Properties and Equipment

Depreciation and Amortization

Upon emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 31, 2017, properties and equipment were stated at their fair market values in accordance with fresh-start accounting. Properties and equipment acquired subsequent to fresh start  are stated at their acquisition cost.  Depreciation is computed primarily on the straight-line basis beginning on acquisition date or on the date construction is completed, with salvage values of 7.5% for marine equipment, using estimated useful lives of 10 - 20 years for marine equipment and 3 - 10 years for other properties and equipment. Depreciation is provided for all vessels unless a vessel meets the criteria to be classified as held for sale. Estimated remaining useful lives are reviewed when there has been a change in circumstances that indicates the original estimated useful life may no longer be appropriate. Upon retirement or disposal of a fixed asset, the costs and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the respective accounts and any gains or losses are included in our consolidated statements of operations.

Maintenance and Repairs

The majority of our vessels require certification inspections twice in every five-year period. These costs include drydocking and survey costs necessary to ensure compliance with applicable regulations and maintain certifications for vessels with classification societies. These certification costs are typically incurred while the vessel is in drydock and may be incurred concurrent with other vessel maintenance and improvement activities. Costs related to the certification of vessels are deferred and amortized over 30 months on a straight-line basis.

Maintenance costs incurred at the time of the recertification drydocking that are not related to the certification of the vessel are expensed as incurred.

Costs related to vessel improvements that either extend the vessel’s useful life or increase the vessel’s functionality are capitalized and depreciated. Vessel modifications that are performed for a specific customer contract are capitalized and amortized over the firm contract term. Major modifications to equipment that are being performed not only for a specific customer contract are capitalized and amortized over the remaining life of the equipment.  

Net Properties and Equipment

The following are summaries of net properties and equipment:

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Properties and equipment:

        

Vessels and related equipment

 $940,175  $1,051,558 

Other properties and equipment

  16,861   13,119 
   957,036   1,064,677 

Less accumulated depreciation and amortization

  176,718   125,716 

Net properties and equipment

 $780,318  $938,961 

As of  December 31, 2020, we owned 172 offshore service vessels, including 23 that were reclassified as assets held for sale in current assets. Excluding the 23 vessels held for sale, we owned 149 vessels, 114 of which were actively employed and 35 of which were stacked. As of December 31, 2019, we owned 217 vessels, including 46 that were classified as held for sale and 19 that were stacked. We consider a vessel to be stacked if the vessel crew is disembarked and limited maintenance is being performed. We reduce operating costs by stacking vessels when we do not foresee opportunities to profitably or strategically operate the vessels in the near future. Vessels are stacked when market conditions warrant and they are removed from stack when they are returned to active service, sold or otherwise disposed. We consider our current stacked vessels to be available for return to service. Stacked vessels are considered to be in service and are included in our utilization statistics. Refer to Note (8) for additional discussion of our asset impairments and the reclassification of the vessels held for sale.

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

We review the vessels in our active fleet for impairment whenever events occur or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset group may not be recoverable. In such evaluation, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows generated by an asset group are compared with the carrying amount of the asset group to determine if a write-down may be required. With respect to vessels that are expected to remain in active service, we group together for impairment testing purposes vessels with similar operating and marketing characteristics. Due in part to the modernization of our fleet more newer vessels are being stacked and are expected to return to active service. Stacked vessels expected to return to active service are generally newer vessels, have similar capabilities and likelihood of future active service as other currently operating vessels, are generally current with classification societies in regard to their regulatory certification status, and are being actively marketed. Stacked vessels expected to return to active service are evaluated for impairment as part of their assigned active asset group and not individually.

59

We estimate cash flows based upon historical data adjusted for our best estimate of expected future market performance, which, in turn, is based on industry trends. The primary estimates and assumptions used in reviewing active vessel groups for impairment and estimating undiscounted cash flows include utilization rates, average day rates and average daily operating expenses. These estimates are made based on recent actual trends in utilization, day rates and operating costs and reflect management’s best estimate of expected market conditions during the period of future cash flows. These assumptions and estimates have changed considerably as market conditions have changed, and they are reasonably likely to continue to change as market conditions change in the future. Although we believe our assumptions and estimates are reasonable, deviations from the assumptions and estimates could produce materially different results. Management estimates may vary considerably from actual outcomes due to future adverse market conditions or poor operating results that could result in the inability to recover the current carrying value of an asset group, thereby possibly requiring an impairment charge in the future. As our fleet continues to age, management closely monitors the estimates and assumptions used in the impairment analysis in order to properly identify evolving trends and changes in market conditions that could impact the results of the impairment evaluation.

If an asset group fails the undiscounted cash flow test, we estimate the fair value of each asset group and compare such estimated fair value to the carrying value of each asset group in order to determine if impairment exists.

In addition to the periodic review of our active long-lived assets for impairment when circumstances warrant, we also perform a review of our stacked vessels not expected to return to active service whenever changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of a vessel may not be recoverable.

Refer to Note (8) for discussion of our evaluations of long-lived assets for impairment during 2020.

Accrued Property and Liability Losses

Effective July 1, 2018, we ceased self-insuring claims through our insurance subsidiary. Insurance coverage is now provided by third party insurers. We establish case-based reserves for estimates of reported losses on outstanding claims, estimates received from ceding reinsurers, and reserves based on past experience of unreported losses. Such losses principally relate to our vessel operations and are included as a component of vessel operating costs in the consolidated statements of earnings. The liability for such losses and the related reimbursement receivable from reinsurance companies are classified in the consolidated balance sheets into current and noncurrent amounts based upon estimates of when the liabilities will be settled and when the receivables will be collected.

Pension Benefits

We follow the provisions of  Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 715,Compensation – Retirement Benefits, and use a December 31 measurement date for determining net periodic benefit costs, benefit obligations and the fair value of plan assets. Net periodic pension costs and accumulated benefit obligations are determined using a number of assumptions including the discount rates used to measure future obligations and expenses, retirement ages, mortality rates, expected long-term return on plan assets, and other assumptions, all of which have a significant impact on the amounts reported.

Our pension cost consists of service costs, interest costs, expected returns on plan assets, amortization of prior service costs or benefits and actuarial gains and losses. We consider a number of factors in developing pension assumptions, including an evaluation of relevant discount rates, expected long-term returns on plan assets, plan asset allocations, expected changes in retirement benefits, analyses of current market conditions and input from actuaries and other consultants.

For the long-term rate of return, we developed assumptions regarding the expected rate of return on plan assets based on historical experience and projected long-term investment returns, which consider the plan’s target asset allocation and long-term asset class return expectations. Assumptions for the discount rate reflect the theoretical rate at which liabilities could be settled in the bond market at December 31, 2020.

60

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 740,Income Taxes. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Deferred taxes are not provided on undistributed earnings of certain non-U.S. subsidiaries and business ventures because we consider those earnings to be permanently invested abroad.

We record uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions would be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that was more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The recognition and measurement of tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions in any tax jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations as well as the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes during any given year.

Revenue Recognition

Our primary source of revenue is derived from time charter contracts of our vessels on a rate per day of service basis; therefore, vessel revenues are recognized on a daily basis throughout the contract period. The base rate of hire for a time charter contract is generally a fixed rate, provided, however, that some longer-term contracts at times include escalation clauses to recover specific additional costs.

Operating Costs

Vessel operating costs are incurred on a daily basis and consist primarily of costs such as crew wages; repair and maintenance; insurance; fuel, lube oil and supplies; and other vessel expenses, which include costs such as brokers’ commissions, training costs, agent fees, port fees, canal transit fees, temporary importation fees, vessel certification fees, and satellite communication fees. Repair and maintenance costs include both routine costs and major repairs carried out during drydockings, which occur during the economic useful life of the vessel. Vessel operating costs are recognized as incurred on a daily basis.

Foreign Currency Translation

The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all of our existing international operations, as transactions in these operations are predominately denominated in U.S. dollars. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses from the revaluation of our foreign currency denominated monetary assets and liabilities are included in the consolidated statements of operations.

Earnings Per Share

We report both basic earnings (loss) per share and diluted earnings (loss) per share. The calculation of basic earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding.  Diluted earnings (loss) per share is computed based on the weighted average number of shares of common stock plus the effect of dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method. Diluted earnings (loss) per share includes the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock grants (both time and performance based) awarded as part of our share-based compensation and incentive plans. Per share amounts disclosed in these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, unless otherwise indicated, are on a diluted basis.

61

The components of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share, are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands, except share and per share data)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Net loss available to common shareholders

 $(196,242) $(141,743) $(171,517)

Weighted average outstanding shares of common stock, basic

  40,354,638   38,204,934   26,589,883 

Dilutive effect of options, warrants and stock awards

  0   0   0 

Weighted average common stock and equivalents

  40,354,638   38,204,934   26,589,883 
             
Loss per share, basic $(4.86) $(3.71) $(6.45)
Loss per share, diluted $(4.86) $(3.71) $(6.45)

Additional information:

            

Incremental "in-the-money" options, warrants, and restricted stock awards and units outstanding at the end of the period (A)

  2,235,310   2,483,956   5,282,574 

Annual cash retainer

(A)

$47,813
img.jpg        unchanged from 2019, this represents a 15% reduction from the 2017 annual retainer ($56,250)
Annual equity-based retainer

For years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018 we also had 5,923,399 shares$168,750 grant date value, delivered in the form of “out-of- the-money” warrants outstandingtime-based restricted stock units (“RSUs”), which vest at the end of each period.

the one-year service period
Additional annual cash retainer for the chair of the board$50,000
Additional annual cash retainer for the chair of the audit committee
$16,250(1)
Additional annual cash retainer for the chair of the compensation committee$15,000
Additional annual cash retainer for the chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee
$5,000(1)(2)

Concentrations


(1)Effective during the fourth quarter of 2020, the annual fees for the chairs of the audit committee and the nominating and corporate governance committee were set at $20,000 and $10,000, respectively.
(2)Such amount does not include $1,250 paid to Randee E. Day, the former chair of the nominating and corporate governance committee.
The number of Credit Risk

Our financial instruments that are exposed to concentrations of credit risk consist primarily of trade and other receivables from a variety of domestic, international and national energy companies. We manage our exposure to risk by performing ongoing credit evaluations of our customers’ financial condition and may at times require prepayments or other forms of collateral. We also have net receivable balances related to joint venturesRSUs granted in which we own less than 50%.  We review and evaluate these receivables for collectability in a similar manner as we evaluate trade receivables.  We maintain an allowance for credit loss based on expected collectability and do not believe we are  generally exposed to concentrations of credit risk that are likely to have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

Stock-Based Compensation

Stock-based compensation transactions are accounted for using a fair-value-based method. We use the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to determine the fair-value of stock-based awards.

Comprehensive Income (Loss)

We report total comprehensive income (loss) and its components. Accumulated other comprehensive income ( loss) is comprised of unrealized gains and losses on available-for-sale securities and any minimum pension liability for our U.S. Defined Benefits Pension Plans.

62

Fair Value Measurements

We follow the provisions of ASC 820, for financial assets and liabilities that are measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis. ASC 820 establishes a hierarchy for inputs used in measuring fair value. Fair valueeach award is calculated based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing assets and liabilities and not on assumptions specific toby dividing the entity. The statement requires that each asset and liability carried at fairgrant date target value be classified into one of the following categories:

Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities

Level 2: Observable market-based inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data

Our primary financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, trade receivables and trade payables with book values that are considered to be representative of their respective fair values.

Our cash equivalents, which are securities with maturities less than 90 days, are held in money market funds or time deposit accounts with highly rated financial institutions. The carrying value for cash equivalents is considered to be representative of its fair value due to the short duration and conservative nature of the cash equivalent investment portfolio

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements 

From time-to-time new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB that we adopt as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements upon adoption.

On August 28, 2018, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2018-13, Fair Value Measurement: - Changes to The Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement, which eliminates, adds and modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements as part of its disclosure framework project. Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but public companies will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2020 and it did not have any impact on our consolidated financial position, net earnings or cash flow. See Note (8) for application of this standard.

On June 16, 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments–Credit Losses, which introduces a new model for recognizing credit losses on financial instruments based on an estimate of current expected credit losses. The new model will apply to: (i) loans, accounts receivable, trade receivables, and other financial assets measured at amortized cost, (ii) loan commitments and certain other off-balance sheet credit exposures, (iii) debt securities and other financial assets measured at fair value through other comprehensive income and (iv) beneficial interests in securitized financial assets. 

Expected credit losses are recognized on the initial recognition of our trade accounts receivable, contract assets and net amounts due from our less than 50% owned joint ventures.  In each subsequent reporting period, even if a loss has not yet been incurred, credit losses are recognized based on the history of credit losses and current conditions, as well as reasonable and supportable forecasts affecting collectability.  We developed an expected credit loss model applicable to our trade accounts receivable and contract assets that considers our historical performance and the economic environment, as well as the credit risk and its expected development for each group of customers that share similar risk characteristics.  We segmented our trade accounts receivable and contract assets by type of client, except for individual account balances that have deteriorated in credit quality, which are evaluated individually.  We then determined, for each of these client asset groups, the average expected credit loss utilizing our actual credit loss experience over the last five years, which was adjusted as discussed above, and was applied to the balance attributable to each segment in our trade accounts receivable and contract asset balances. We review and evaluate our net receivables due from joint ventures for collectability in a similar manner as we evaluate trade receivables.    This standard was adopted through a cumulative-effect adjustment to the accumulated deficit as of January 1, 2020, which is the beginning of the first period in which this guidance is effective.  Periods prior to the adoption date that are presented for comparative purposes are not adjusted.  Adopting this standard on January 1, 2020 increased the allowance for expected credit losses by approximately $0.2 million.

Activity in the allowance for credit losses for the year ended December 31, 2020 is as follows:

  

Trade

  

Due

 
  

and

  

from

 

(In thousands)

 

Other Receivables

  

Affiliate

 

Balance at January 1, 2020

 $70  $20,083 

Cumulative effect adjustment upon adoption of standard

  163   0 

Current period provision for expected credit losses

  1,283   52,981 

Other

  0   (1,264)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $1,516  $71,800 

63

Recently Issued Accounting Standards Not Yet Adopted

In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes, which simplifies the accounting for income taxes by removing certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and clarifying and amending existing guidance to simplify the accounting for income taxes. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2021 and it will not have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.

In August 2018 the FASB issued ASU 2018-14, Compensation – Retirement Benefits – Defined Benefit Plans – General, which modifies the disclosure requirements for employers that sponsor defined benefit plans or other postretirement plans. This ASU removes certain disclosures that no longer are considered cost beneficial, clarifies the specific requirements of certain other disclosures, and adds disclosure requirements identified as relevant. The guidance is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020 with early adoption permitted. We adopted this standard on January 1, 2021 and it will not have a material impact on our defined benefit plan disclosures.

(2)     BUSINESS COMBINATION

On the Merger Date, we completed our business combination with GulfMark pursuant to the Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated July 15, 2018 (the “business combination”). GulfMark’s results are included in our consolidated results beginning on the Merger Date.

Revenues of GulfMark from the Merger Date included in our consolidated statements of operations were $12.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The net loss of GulfMark from the Merger Date was $30.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Purchase Consideration

Upon completion of the business combination, GulfMark stockholders received 1.1 (the Exchange Ratio) shares of Tidewater common stock in exchange for each share of GulfMark owned. Outstanding GulfMark Creditor Warrants (GLF Creditor Warrants) and GulfMark Equity Warrants (GLF Equity Warrants) were assumed from GulfMark with each warrant becoming exercisable for 1.1 shares of Tidewater common stock on substantially the same terms and conditions as provided in the warrant agreements governing the GLF Creditor Warrants and the GLF Equity Warrants. All outstanding GulfMark restricted stock units (awards granted to GulfMark directors and management prior to the merger) were converted into substantially similar awards to acquire Tidewater common stock with the number of restricted stock units being adjusted by the Exchange Ratio. The fair value of the Tidewater common stock and warrants issued as part of the consideration paid for GulfMark was determined based on the closing price of Tidewater’s common stock on the New York Stock Exchange on November 14, 2018.

Upon consummation of the business combination, we utilized cash from GulfMark and cash on hand to repay the $100 million outstanding balance of GulfMark’s term loan facility. The total purchase consideration for this business combination was $385.5 million.

Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed

Assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the business combination have been recorded at their estimated fair values as of the Merger Date under the acquisition method of accounting. The estimated fair values of certain assets and liabilities including long-lived assets and contingencies require judgments and assumptions. There were no adjustments to the original fair value estimates during the measurement period subsequent to the Merger Date.

64

Upon consummation of the business combination, the $100.0 million GulfMark term loan was repaid. The amounts for assets acquired and liabilities as of the Merger Date were as follows:

  

Estimated Fair

 

(In thousands)

 

Value

 

Assets:

    

Current assets

 $77,942 

Property and equipment

  360,701 

Other assets

  779 

Liabilities:

    

Current liabilities

  33,881 

Long term debt

  100,000 

Other liabilities

  20,049 

Net assets acquired

 $285,492 

Business Combination Related Costs

Business combination related costs were expensed as incurred and consisted of various advisory, legal, accounting, valuation and other professional fees totaling $9.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. These costs are included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated statement of operations.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment acquired in the business combination consisted primarily of 65 offshore support vessels. We recorded property and equipment acquired at its estimated fair value of approximately $361.0 million. The fair values of the offshore support vessels were estimated by applying an income approach, using projected discounted cash flows or a market approach. We estimated the remaining useful lives for the GulfMark fleet, which ranged from 1 to 18 years based on an original estimated useful life of 20 years.

Deferred Taxes

The business combination was executed through the acquisition of GulfMark’s outstanding common stock and therefore the historical tax bases of the acquired assets and assumed liabilities, net operating losses and other tax attributes of GulfMark were assumed at the Merger Date. However, adjustments to the deferred tax assets and liabilities for the tax effects of the difference between the acquisition date fair values and the tax bases of assets acquired and liabilities assumed were nearly completely offset by valuation allowances which resulted in only a minor change to the net deferred tax accounts of GulfMark.

Pro Forma Impact of the Merger

The following unaudited supplemental pro forma results present consolidated information as if the business combination was completed on January 1, 2018. The pro forma results include, among others, (i) a reduction in depreciation expense for adjustments to property and equipment and (ii) a reduction in interest expense resulting from the extinguishment of the GulfMark Term Loan Facility. The pro forma results do not include any potential synergies or non-recurring charges that may result directly from the business combination.

  

Year

 

(Unaudited)

 

Ended

 

(in millions, except per share amounts)

 

December 31, 2018

 

Revenues

 $500,118 

Net loss

  (196,057)

Basic loss per common share

  (5.66)

Diluted loss per common share

  (5.66)

(3)     REVENUE RECOGNITION

Our primary source of revenue is derived from charter contracts for which we provide a vessel and crew on a rate per day of service basis. Services provided under respective charter contracts represent a single performance obligation satisfied over time and are comprised of a series of time increments; therefore, vessel revenues are recognized on a daily basis throughout the contract period. There are no material differences in the cost structure of our contracts because operating costs are generally the same without regard to the length of a contract. Customers are typically billed on a monthly basis for day rate services and payment terms are generally 30 to 45 days.

65

Occasionally, customers pay additional lump-sum fees to us in order to either mobilize a vessel to a new location prior to the start of a charter contract or demobilize the vessel at the end of a charter contract. Mobilizations are not a separate performance obligation; thus, we have determined that mobilization fees are a component of the vessel’s charter contract. As such, we defer lump-sum mobilization fees as a liability and recognize such fees as revenue consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition primarily on a straight-line basis over the term of the vessel’s respective charter. Lump-sum demobilization revenue expected to be received upon contract termination is deferred as an asset and recognized ratably as revenue only in circumstances where the receipt of the demobilization fee at the end of the contract can be estimated and there is a high degree of certainty that collection will occur.

Customers also occasionally reimburse us for modifications to vessels in order to meet contractual requirements. These vessel modifications are not considered to be a separate performance obligation of the vessel’s charter; thus, we record a liability for lump-sum payments made by customers for vessel modification and recognize it as revenue consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition primarily on a straight-line basis over the term of the vessel’s respective charter.

Total revenue is determined for each individual contract by estimating both fixed (mobilization, demobilization and vessels modifications) and variable (day rate services) consideration expected to be earned over the contract term.

Costs associated with customer-directed mobilizations and reimbursed modifications to vessels are considered costs of fulfilling a charter contract and are expected to be recovered. Mobilization costs such as crew, travel, fuel, port fees, temporary importation fees and other costs are deferred as an asset and amortized as other vessel operating expenses consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition primarily on a straight-line basis over the term of such vessel’s charter. Costs incurred for modifications to vessels in order to meet contractual requirements are capitalized as a fixed asset and depreciated either over the term of the respective charter contract or over the remaining estimated useful life of the vessel in instances where the modification is a permanent upgrade to the vessel and enhances its usefulness.

Refer to Note (14) for the amount of revenue by segment and in total for the worldwide fleet.

Contract Balances

Trade accounts receivables are recognized when revenue is earned and collectible. Contract assets include pre-contract costs, primarily related to vessel mobilizations, which have been deferred and will be amortized as other vessel expenses consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition primarily on a straight-line basis over the term of such vessel’s charter. Contract liabilities include payments received for mobilizations or reimbursable vessel modifications to be recognized consistent with the pattern of revenue recognition primarily on a straight-line basis over the term of such vessel’s charter. At December 31, 2020we had $2.2 million and $4.3 million of deferred mobilization costs included with other current assets and other assets, respectively, and we have $0.4 million of deferred mobilization revenue related to unsatisfied performance obligations included within other current liabilities, all of which will be recognized during the year end December 31, 2021. At December 31, 2019 we had $4.1 million and $0.8 million of deferred mobilization costs included with other current assets and other assets, respectively, and we have $1.0 million of deferred mobilization revenue related to unsatisfied performance obligations included within other current liabilities all of which were recognized during the year ended December 31, 2020.

66

(4)INDEBTEDNESS

The following table summarizes debt outstanding based on stated maturities:

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Secured notes:

        

8.00% Secured notes due August 2022

 $147,049  $224,793 

Troms Offshore borrowings:

        

NOK denominated notes due May 2024

  5,954   10,260 

NOK denominated notes due January 2026

  14,559   20,788 

USD denominated notes due January 2027

  14,744   20,273 

USD denominated notes due April 2027

  15,669   21,545 
   197,975   297,659 

Debt premium and discount, net

  (5,244)  (8,725)

Less: Current portion of long-term debt

  (27,797)  (9,890)

Total long-term debt

 $164,934  $279,044 

We may from time to time seek to retire or purchase our outstanding debt through cash purchases and/or exchanges for equity securities, in open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions or otherwise. Such repurchases or exchanges, if any, will depend on prevailing market conditions, our liquidity requirements, contractual restrictions and other factors. The amounts involved may be material.

Secured Notes

Upon our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on July 31, 2017 and  pursuant to the terms of the plan of reorganization, we entered into an indenture (the Indenture) by and among our wholly-owned subsidiaries named as guarantors therein (the Guarantors), and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee and collateral agent (the Trustee), and issued $350.0 million aggregate principal amount of our 8.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the Secured Notes).

We amended the Indenture pursuant to the Third Supplemental Indenture dated November 22, 2019 to allow for additional flexibility in our financial covenants, the ability to incur indebtedness, grant liens and make restricted payments. Additional revisions were made to enhance operational flexibility and streamline compliance provisions. We further amended the Indenture pursuant to the Fourth Supplemental Indenture dated November 19, 2020 to allow for additional flexibility in our financial covenants.

The Secured Notes will mature on August 1,2022. Interest on the Secured Notes accrues at a rate of 8.00% per annum and is payable quarterly in arrears on February 1,May 1,August 1, and November 1 of each year in cash. The Secured Notes are secured by substantially all of our assets and our Guarantors.

As of December 31, 2020, the fair value (Level 2) of the Secured Notes was $141.4 million.

The Secured Notes have a trailing twelve month interest coverage requirement. Compliance with this covenant has been waived from April 1, 2021 through December 31, 2021. Minimum liquidity requirements and other covenants are set forth in the Indenture and are in effect from July 31, 2017. The Indenture also contains certain customary events of default and has a make-whole provision.

Until terminated under the circumstances described in this paragraph, the Secured Notes and the guarantees by the Guarantors are secured by the Collateral pursuant to the terms of the Indenture and the related security documents. The Trustee’s liens upon the Collateral and the right of the holders of the Secured Notes to the benefits and proceeds of the Trustee’s liens on the Collateral will terminate and be discharged in certain circumstances described in the Indenture, including: (i) upon satisfaction and discharge of the Indenture in accordance with the terms thereof; or (ii) as to any Collateral that is sold, transferred or otherwise disposed of by us or the Guarantors in a transaction or other circumstance that complies with the terms of the Indenture, at the time of such sale, transfer or other disposition.

Secured Notes Tender Offer

We are obligated to offer to repurchase the Secured Notes at par in amounts that generally approximate 65% of asset sale proceeds as defined in the Indenture.

In February and December of 2018, we commenced offers to repurchase up to $24.7 million and $25.4 million, respectively, of the Secured Notes. In March 2018 and January 2019, we repurchased $0.04 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of the Secured Notes in accordance with these tender offer obligations. 

67

The $2.1 million and $5.8 million restricted cash on the balance sheet at December 31, 2020 and 2019, represent proceeds from asset sales since the date of the last tender offer and is restricted as of that date by the terms of the Indenture. Upon completion of the November 2020 tender offer described below, the restriction on the non-tendered amount of restricted cash as of December 31, 2019 was released. The restricted cash at December 31, 2020 remains restricted until the next tender offer is complete.

We completed a successful voluntary tender offer for our Secured Notes in November 2019 that resulted in the repurchase of notes with a face value of $125.0 million plus a premium of 8.5% for total repurchase price of $135.6 million. We accounted for this tender as a modification of debt and deferred the premium and other costs of $11.4 million which will be expensed under the interest method over the remaining term.

During August and September 2020, we repurchased $27.7 million of the Secured Notes in open market transactions.

We completed a successful voluntary tender offer for our Secured Notes in November 2020 that resulted in the repurchase of notes with a face value of $50.0 million, which included the release of all restricted cash described above, for a total repurchase price of $50.3 million.  We accounted for this tender as a modification of debt and deferred the premium and other costs of $0.6 million which will be expensed under the interest method over the remaining term.

Troms Offshore Debt

Between 2012 and 2014 our indirect wholly owned subsidiary, Troms Offshore, entered into two Norwegian kroner (NOK) denominated 12 year borrowing agreements aggregating 504.4 million NOK maturing in May 2024 and January 2026.  In addition, in 2015 Troms Offshore entered into to two U.S. dollar denominated 12 year borrowing agreements aggregating $60.8 million and maturing in early 2027.   Each loan requires semi-annual principal and interest payments and bears interest at fixed rates ranging from 4.56% to 6.13%.  

Amounts outstanding on each of these borrowing agreements are indicated on the table below including the U.S. dollar equivalents for the NOK denominated borrowing agreements.

68

 
  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Notes due May 2024

        

NOK denominated

  51,120   89,460 

U.S. dollar equivalent

 $5,954  $10,260 

Fair value in U.S. dollar equivalent (Level 2)

  5,954   10,259 

Notes due January 2026

        

NOK denominated

  125,000   181,250 

U.S. dollar equivalent

 $14,559  $20,788 

Fair value in U.S. dollar equivalent (Level 2)

  14,789   20,792 
Notes due January 2027        
Amount outstanding $14,744  $20,273 
Fair value of debt outstanding (Level 2)  15,040   20,278 
Notes due April 2027        
Amount outstanding $15,669  $21,545 
Fair value of debt outstanding (Level 2)  15,775   21,546 

When we emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy in 2017 the Troms Offshore credit agreement was amended and restated to (i) reduce by 50% the required principal payments due through March 31, 2019, (ii) modestly increase the interest rates on amounts outstanding through April 2023, and (iii) provide for security and additional guarantees, including (a) mortgages on 6 vessels and related assignments of earnings and insurances, (b) share pledges by Troms Offshore and certain subsidiaries of Troms Offshore, and (c) guarantees by certain subsidiaries of Troms Offshore.

An amendment and restatement was executed in December 2020 whereby the financial covenants were conformed to match the November 2020 amendments to the covenants governing the Senior Notes, as described above, and included an obligation to prepay (1) the amounts deferred in the 2017 amendment and restatement and (2) an additional amount representing a percentage of Senior Notes prepayments that will not exceed $45 million including the prepayment of the amounts deferred in the 2017 amendment and restatement. The prepayment associated with this amendment made in December 2020 totaled $12.5 million. Additional prepayment obligations of $22.8 million are due in the first half of 2021 and are reflected in current portion of long-term debt on our consolidated balance sheet.

GulfMark Term Loan Facility

Upon consummation of the business combination, we repaid the $100.0 million outstanding balance of GulfMark’s Term Loan Facility plus accrued interest and an early extinguishment penalty which resulted in the recognition of a loss on early extinguishment of debt of $8.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Debt Costs

We capitalize a portion of our interest costs incurred on borrowed funds used to construct vessels. Interest and debt costs incurred, net of interest capitalized are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Interest and debt costs incurred, net of interest capitalized

 $24,156  $29,068  $30,439 

Interest costs capitalized

  0   0   521 

Total interest and debt costs

 $24,156  $29,068  $30,960 

69

(5)

INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED AFFILIATES

We maintained the following balances with our unconsolidated affiliates:

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(in thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Due from affiliates:

        

Angolan joint venture (Sonatide)

 $41,623  $89,246 

Nigerian joint venture (DTDW)

  20,427   36,726 
   62,050   125,972 

Due to affiliates:

        

Sonatide

 $32,767  $31,475 

DTDW

  20,427   18,711 
   53,194   50,186 

Due from affiliates, net of due to affiliates

 $8,856  $75,786 

Amounts due from Sonatide

Amounts due from Sonatide (Due from affiliate in the consolidated balance sheets) at December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 of approximately $41.6 million and $89.2 million, respectively, represent cash received by Sonatide from customers and due to us, amounts due from customers that are expected to be remitted to us through Sonatide and costs incurred by us on behalf of Sonatide.  The following table displays the activity in the due from affiliate account related to Sonatide for the periods indicated:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Due from Sonatide at beginning of year

 $89,246  $109,176  $230,315 

Revenue earned by the company through Sonatide

  44,254   52,372   56,916 

Less amounts received from Sonatide

  (36,160)  (60,486)  (76,878)

Less amounts used to offset Due to Sonatide obligations (A)

  (11,848)  (10,551)  (78,993)

Less impairment of due from affiliate

  (40,900)  0   (20,083)

Other

  (2,969)  (1,265)  (2,101)
  $41,623  $89,246  $109,176 

(A)

We reduced the respective due from affiliates and due to affiliates balances each period through netting transactions based on agreement with the joint venture.

The obligation to us from Sonatide is denominated in U.S. dollars; however, the underlying third-party customer payments to Sonatide were satisfied, in part, in Angolan kwanzas. In late 2019, we were informed that, as part of a broad privatization program, Sonagal intends to seek to divest itself from Sonatide.

In the second quarter of 2020 Sonatide declared a $35.0 million dividend.  On June 22, 2020, Sonangol received $17.8 million and we received $17.2 million.  Our share of the dividend is reflected as dividend income from unconsolidated company in the consolidated statement of operations because (i) our investment in Sonatide had previously been written down to zero, (ii) the distributions are not refundable and (iii) we are not liable for the obligations of or committed to provide financial support to Sonatide.  In addition, as a result of the aforementioned dividend payment, the cash balances of the joint venture were significantly reduced and we determined that, as a result, a significant portion of our net due from Sonatide balance was compromised.

Sonatide had approximately $9.4 million of cash on hand, including $1.6 million denominated in Angolan kwanzas at December 31, 2020 plus approximately $9.8 million of net trade accounts receivable, providing approximately $19.2 million of current assets to satisfy the net due from Sonatide. Given prior discussions with our partner regarding how the net losses from the devaluation of certain Angolan kwanza denominated accounts should be shared, we continue to evaluate our net due from Sonatide balance for potential impairment based on available liquidity held by Sonatide. We determined that a portion of our net due from balance was compromised and in December 2018 we recorded an approximate $20.0 million asset impairment charge. During the year ended December 31, 2020, we recorded a $40.9 million affiliate credit loss impairment expense.  We will continue to monitor the net due from Sonatide balance for possible additional impairment in future periods.  

70

Amounts due to Sonatide

Amounts due to Sonatide (Due to affiliate in the consolidated balance sheets) at December 31, 2020 and 2019 of approximately $32.8 million and $31.5 million, respectively, primarily represents commissions payable and other costs paid by Sonatide on our behalf.  The following table displays the activity in the due to affiliate account related to Sonatide for the periods indicated:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Due to Sonatide at beginning of year

 $31,475  $29,347  $99,448 

Plus commissions payable to Sonatide

  4,152   4,937   5,502 

Plus amounts paid by Sonatide on behalf of the company

  9,037   9,654   14,778 

Less commissions paid to Sonatide

  0   (5,961)  (13,906)

Less amounts used to offset Due from Sonatide obligations (A)

  (11,848)  (10,551)  (78,993)

Other

  (49)  4,049   2,518 
  $32,767  $31,475  $29,347 

(A)

We reduced the respective due from affiliates and due to affiliates balances each period through netting transactions based on agreement with the joint venture.

Sonatide Operations

Sonatide’s principal earnings are from the commissions paid by us to the joint venture for company vessels chartered in to Angola. In addition, Sonatide owns two vessels that may generate operating income and cash flow.

Company operations in Angola

For the year ended December 31, 2020, our Angolan operation generated vessel revenues of approximately $45.3 million or 11.7% of our consolidated vessel revenues, from an average of approximately 23 company owned vessels that are marketed through Sonatide, 6 of which were stacked on average during the year ended December 31, 2020.

For the year ended December 31, 2019, our Angolan operation generated vessel revenues of approximately $52.1 million or 10.9% of our consolidated vessel revenues, from an average of approximately 32 company owned vessels that are marketed through Sonatide, 13 of which were stacked on average during the year ended December 31, 2019.

For the year ended December 31, 2018, our Angolan operations generated vessel revenues of approximately $59.0 million, or 15%, of our consolidated vessel revenue, from an average of approximately 37 company-owned vessels that are marketed through Sonatide, 16 of which were stacked on average during the year ended December 31, 2018.

Amounts due from DTDW

We own 40% of DTDW in Nigeria.  Our partner, who owns 60%, is a Nigerian national.  DTDW owns 1 offshore service vessel and has long term debt of $4.7 million which is secured by the vessel and guarantees from the DTDW partners. We also operate company owned vessels in Nigeria for which the joint venture receives a commission.  As of December 31, 2020, we had no company owned vessels operating in Nigeria and the DTDW owned vessel was not employed.  At the beginning of 2020 we had expected that we would be operating numerous vessels in Nigeria, but in the second quarter of 2020 the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting oil price reduction (further described in Note 8) caused our primary customer in Nigeria to eliminate all planned operations for 2020.  As a result, the near-term cash flow projections indicate that DTDW does not have sufficient funds to meet its obligations to us or to the holder of its long-term debt.  Therefore, we recorded affiliate credit loss impairment expense for the year ending December 31,2020 totaling $12.1 million.  In addition, based on our analysis we have determined that DTDW will be unable to pay its debt obligation and the debt will not be satisfied by liquidating the vessel and, as a result, we recorded additional impairment expense of $2.0 million for our expected share of the obligation guarantee during the year ended December 31,2020.

(6)

INCOME TAXES 

Losses before income taxes derived from United States and non-U.S. operations are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Non-U.S.

 $(137,225) $(44,205) $(99,607)

United States

  (60,436)  (69,290)  (53,912)
  $(197,661) $(113,495) $(153,519)

71

Income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following:

  

U.S.

         

(In thousands)

 

Federal

  

State

  

Non-U.S.

  

Total

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

                

Current

 $962   0   16,718   17,680 

Deferred

  531   250   (209)  572 
  $1,493   250   16,509   18,252 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

                

Current

 $649   0   26,403   27,052 

Deferred

  672   0   0   672 
  $1,321   0   26,403   27,724 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

                

Current

 $(21,005)  0   18,816   (2,189)

Deferred

  (30)  0   1,254   1,224 
  $(21,035)  0   20,070   (965)

The actual income tax expense above differs from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 21% to pre-tax earnings as a result of the following:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Computed “expected” tax benefit

 $(41,509) $(23,834)  (32,239)

Increase (reduction) resulting from:

            

Foreign income taxed at different rates

  27,639   9,283   20,917 

Uncertain tax positions

  (62,833)  5,145   2,264 

Nondeductible transaction costs

  0   0   1,091 

Valuation allowance – deferred tax assets

  43,455   15,707   38,778 
Valuation allowance -deferred tax true-up  (6,523)  0   0 
Deferred tax true-up  6,523   0   0 

Foreign taxes

  12,520   20,778   13,012 

State taxes

  0   0   246 

Return to accrual

  11,401   (2,247)  (28,176)

162(m) - Executive compensation

  286   28   2,818 

Subpart F income

  5,631   1,227   0 

Other, net

  2,445   1,637   (459)
  $(965) $27,724   18,252 

72

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities are as follows:

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Deferred tax assets:

        

Accrued employee benefit plan costs

 $8,815  $7,422 

Stock based compensation

  407   972 

Net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards

  148,699   99,281 

Restructuring fees not currently deductible for tax purposes

  1,415   2,264 

Disallowed business interest expense carryforward

  5,546   5,105 

Other

  2,518   3,380 

Gross deferred tax assets

  167,400   118,424 

Less valuation allowance

  (140,428)  (103,496)

Net deferred tax assets

  26,972   14,928 

Deferred tax liabilities:

        

Depreciation and amortization

  (25,883)  (11,246)

Outside basis difference deferred tax liability

  (2,891)  (2,892)
Foreign interest withholding tax  (859)  0 

Other

  (754)  (2,981)

Gross deferred tax liabilities

  (30,387)  (17,119)

Net deferred tax assets (liabilities)

 $(3,415) $(2,191)

On November 15, 2018 we completed a series of mergers through which all of the shares of GulfMark Offshore, Inc. were acquired. The merger transactions qualified as tax free reorganization under Internal Revenue Code (IRC) Section 368(a), resulting in a carryover of tax basis in the assets and liabilities of GulfMark. Tidewater recorded net deferred liabilities of $1.0 million after valuation allowance in the opening balance sheet of GulfMark.

On March 27, 2020, the United States enacted the CARES Act, which made changes to existing U.S. tax laws, including, but not limited to, (1) allowing U.S. federal net operating losses originated in the 2018,2019 or 2020 tax years to be carried back five years to recover taxes paid based upon taxable income in the prior five years, (2) eliminated the 80% of taxable income limitation on net operating losses for the 2018,2019 and 2020 tax years (the 80% limitation will be reinstated for tax years after 2020), (3) accelerating the refund of prior year alternative minimum tax credits, and (4) modifying the limitation on deductible interest expense. Considering the available carryback, we have recorded a tax benefit of $6.9 million related to the realization of net operating loss deferred tax assets on which a valuation allowance was previously recorded. The change in the deductible interest limitation from 30% to 50% has led to an additional interest expense deduction of $6.0 million in the current year.

As of December 31, 2020, the Company had U.S. federal net operating loss carryforwards of $320.7 million, which includes $159.3 million of net operating losses subject to an IRC Section 382 limitation. As of December 31, 2019, the Company had $300.0 million of U.S. federal net operating losses, which includes $145.9 million of net operating losses subject to an IRC Section 382 limitation. We have $387.4 million foreign tax credits as of December 31, 2020. We have foreign net operating loss carryforwards of $110.9 million that will expire beginning in 2026 with many having indefinite carryforward periods.

IRC Sections 382 and 383 provide an annual limitation with respect to the ability of a corporation to utilize its tax attributes, as well as certain built-in-losses, against future U.S. taxable income in the event of a change in ownership. Our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings in 2017 is considered a change in ownership for purposes of IRC Section 382. The Company’s annual limitation under the IRC is approximately $15.0 million which is based on our value as of the ownership change date. In addition, the merger with GulfMark resulted in a change in ownership of GulfMark for purposes of IRC Section 382. The GulfMark ownership change results in an annual limitation of approximately $7.0 million on GulfMark’s tax attributes generated prior to the ownership change date, which begin to expire in 2032. The Company has recorded a valuation allowance on the net operating loss balance as it believes that it is more likely than not that the deferred tax asset will not be realized.

Management assesses the available positive and negative evidence to estimate whether sufficient future taxable income will be generated to permit the use of the existing deferred tax assets. A significant piece of objective negative evidence evaluated were the cumulative losses for financial reporting purposes that were incurred over the three-year periods ended December 31,2020. Such objective negative evidence limits the ability to consider other subjective evidence, such as our projections for future growth and tax planning strategies.

On the basis of this evaluation, for the period ended December 31, 2020, a valuation allowance of $140.4 million was recorded against our net deferred tax asset. For the period ended December 31, 2019, a valuation allowance of $103.5 million was recorded against our net deferred tax asset. The increase in the valuation allowance was primarily attributable to the additional valuation allowance on foreign tax credits that were previously reduced by uncertain tax positions which were released by a statute of limitation expiration. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable could be adjusted if estimates of future U.S. taxable income during the carryforward period are reduced or increased or if objective negative evidence in the form of cumulative losses is no longer present and additional weight is given to subjective evidence such as our projections for growth and/or tax planning strategies.

We have not recognized a U.S. deferred tax liability associated with temporary differences related to investments in our non-U.S. holding companies as the Company does not intend to dispose of the stock of these companies. These differences relate primarily to stock basis differences attributable to factors other than earnings, given that any untaxed cumulative earnings were subject to taxation in the U.S. in 2017 in accordance with the Tax Act. Further, any post-2017 earnings of these subsidiaries will either be taxed currently for U.S. purposes or will be permanently exempt from U.S. taxation. It is not practicable to estimate the deferred tax liability associated with temporary differences related to investments in our non-U.S. holding companies due to the legal structure and complexity of U.S. and non-U.S. tax laws.

Historically, it has been the practice and intention of the Company to indefinitely reinvest the earnings of its non-U.S. subsidiaries. In light of the significant changes made by the Tax Act, the Company will no longer be indefinitely reinvested with regards to its non-U.S. earnings which can be repatriated free of taxation. However, the Company is indefinitely reinvested in the non-U.S. earnings that could be subject to taxation and no deferred taxes have been provided. As of December 31, 2020, the non-U.S. positive unremitted earnings, for which the Company is indefinitely reinvested, are $140.8 million. It is not practicable for the Company to estimate the amount of taxes on positive unremitted earnings due to the legal structure and complexity of non-U.S. tax laws. The Company decides each period whether to indefinitely reinvest these earnings. If, as a result of these reassessments, the Company distributes these earnings in the future, additional tax liabilities could result.

We record uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process in which (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. The recognition and measurement of tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions in any tax jurisdiction requires the interpretation of the related tax laws and regulations as well as the use of estimates and assumptions regarding significant future events. Changes in tax laws, regulations, agreements and treaties, foreign currency exchange restrictions or our level of operations or profitability in each taxing jurisdiction could have an impact on the amount of income taxes during any given year.

Our balance sheet reflects the following in accordance with ASC 740:

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Tax liabilities for uncertain tax positions

 $35,304  $48,577 

Income tax payable

  15,928   13,760 

Income tax receivable

  8,280   3,798 

Included in the liability balances for uncertain tax positions above for the periods ending December 31, 2020 and 2019, are $22.1 million and $24.8 million of penalties and interest, respectively. Penalties and interest related to income tax liabilities are included in income tax expense. Income tax payable is included in other current liabilities.

74

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of all unrecognized tax benefits, and the liability for uncertain tax positions (but excluding related penalties and interest) are as follows:

(In thousands)

    

Balance at December 31, 2017

 $404,571 

Additions from GulfMark business combination

  8,857 

Additions based on tax positions related to a prior year

  6,903 

Settlement and lapse of statute of limitations

  (2,953)

Reductions based on tax positions related to a prior year

  (18,086)

Balance at December 31, 2018 (A)

 $399,292 

Additions based on tax positions related to the current year

  14,741 

Additions based on tax positions related to a prior year

  1,964 

Settlement and lapse of statute of limitations

  (1,897)

Reductions based on tax positions related to a prior year

  (58)

Balance at December 31, 2019 (A)

 $414,042 

Additions based on tax positions related to a prior year

  2,223 

Settlement and lapse of statute of limitations

  (64,458)

Reductions based on tax positions related to a prior year

  (760)

Balance at December 31, 2020 (A)

 $351,047 

(A)

The gross balance reported as uncertain tax positions is largely offset by $337.9 million of foreign tax credits and other tax attributes.

It is reasonably possible that a decrease of $5.9 million in unrecognized tax benefits may be necessary within the coming year due to the lapse of statutes of limitations or audit settlements.

The amount of unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized for tax purposes, would affect the effective tax rate are $35.3 million and $48.6 million as of December 31, 2020 and December 31, 2019 respectively.

With limited exceptions, we are no longer subject to tax audits by U.S. federal, state, local or foreign taxing authorities for fiscal years prior to March 2015. In October 2019, the Company received notification from the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) that the Company’s U.S. income tax return ended March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2017 was selected for examination.  In March 2020, the IRS notified management that the IRS will not proceed with the audit examination for the tax years ended March 31, 2017 and December 31, 2017. In October 2020, the Company received notification from the IRS that the GulfMark U.S. income tax return ending December 31, 2017 was selected for examination. We have ongoing examinations by various foreign tax authorities and do not believe that the results of these examinations will have a material adverse effect on our financial position or results of operations.

The Tax Act

The Tax Act was enacted on December 22, 2017 and introduced significant changes to U.S. income tax law, including a reduction in the statutory income tax rate from 35% to 21% effective January 1, 2018, a one-time transition tax on deemed repatriation of deferred foreign income, a base erosion anti-abuse tax (“BEAT”) that effectively imposes a minimum tax on certain payments to non-U.S. affiliates, new and revised rules relating to the current taxation of certain income of foreign subsidiaries under the global intangible low-tax income (“GILTI”) regime, changes to net operating loss carryforwards, immediate expensing for capital expenditures, and revised rules associated with limitations on the deduction of interest.

We finalized our calculations of the transition tax liability resulting from the Tax Act enacted on December 22, 2017 during 2018 and determined that we had no remaining earnings and profits to recognize as a one-time transition tax.

The Tax Act subjects a US shareholder to tax on GILTI earned by certain foreign subsidiaries. We have made an accounting policy election to account for GILTI in the year the tax is incurred. Due to current year losses, no GILTI was recognized for the years ending December 31, 2020, 2019 or 2018.

The BEAT provisions in the Tax Act eliminate the deduction of certain base-erosion payments made to related foreign corporations beginning in 2018, and impose a minimum tax if greater than regular tax. The BEAT did not have a material impact on our provision for income tax.

(7)     LEASES

We have operating leases primarily for office space, temporary residences, automobiles and office equipment. Contracts containing assets that we benefit from and control are recognized on our balance sheet. Leases with an initial term of 12 months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet. We recognized lease expense for these leases on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We combine the lease and non-lease components for all of our lease agreements.

75

Certain leases include one or more options to renew, with renewal terms that can extend the lease term from one to ten years. The exercise of lease renewal options is at our sole discretion, and lease renewal options are not included in our lease terms if they are not reasonably certain to be exercised. Our lease agreements do not contain any residual value guarantees or restrictive covenants or options to purchase the leased property.  The amount of right of use assets and lease liabilities recorded on our Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, are as follows.

Leases (In thousands)

Classification

 

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

Assets:

         

Operating

Other assets

 $3,372  $4,338 

Liabilities:

         

Current

         

Operating

Other current liabilities

  1,134   501 

Noncurrent

         

Operating

Other liabilities

  2,668   4,274 

Total lease liabilities

 $3,802  $4,775 

Future payments to be made on our operating lease liabilities at December 31, 2020 will be as follows.

Maturity of lease liabilities (In thousands)

 

Operating leases

 

2021

 $1,318 

2022

  1,094 

2023

  717 

2024

  273 

2025

  273 

After 2025

  547 

Total lease payments

 $4,222 

Less: Interest

  (420)

Present value of lease liabilities

 $3,802 

As most of our leases do not provide an implicit interest rate, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at the commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments.

We used the incremental borrowing rate on January 1, 2019 for operating leases that began prior to that date.

Lease costs included in general and administrative expense for the two years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, is as follows.

   

Year Ended

  

Year Ended

 

Lease costs (In thousands)

Classification

 

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 
Operating lease costsGeneral and administrative  1,270   1,336 
Short-term leasesGeneral and administrative  3,483   4,840 
Variable lease costsGeneral and administrative  392   313 
Sublease incomeGeneral and administrative  0   (3)
Net lease cost  5,145   6,486 

Our weighted average remaining lease term and weighted average discount rate at December 31, 2020 is as follows.

Lease term and discount rate

December 31, 2020

Weighted average remaining lease term in years

3.1

Weighted average discount rate

7.3%

The cash paid for operating leases included in operating cash flows and in the measurement of lease liabilities for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019 was $1.0 million and $1.4 million, respectively. Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations were $0.3 million and $0.8 million, for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively.

(8)ASSETS HELD FOR SALE, ASSET SALES AND ASSET IMPAIIMENTS

In previous years, we sought opportunities to dispose of our older vessels when market conditions warranted and opportunities would arise. As a result, vessel dispositions would vary from year to year, and gains (losses) on sales of assets would also fluctuate significantly from period to period. The majority of our vessels were sold to buyers with whom we do not compete in the offshore energy industry.  We continue to employ that strategy, but to a lesser extent.  In the fourth quarter of 2019, we made a strategic decision to reduce the size of our fleet and to remove assets that were not considered to be part of our long-term plans.  As a result, we evaluated our fleet for vessels to be considered for disposal and identified 46 (approximately 20% of our total vessels at the time) vessels to be classified as held for sale.  Beginning late in the first quarter of 2020, the industry and world economies were affected by a global pandemic and a concurrent reduction in the demand for and the price of crude oil (see discussion below in this Note 8). The pandemic and oil price impact severely affected the oil and gas industry and caused us to expand our disposal program to include more vessels.  In the second and fourth quarters of 2020, we added 32 vessels to our assets held for sale.  During 2020, we sold a total of 53 of the vessels that were classified as held for sale, moved two vessels back into our active fleet and have 23 vessels remaining in the held for sale account as of December 31, 2020. See the following tables for additions and dispositions related to  assets held for sale as well as net gains on sales of vessels and impairments recorded when the assets were valued at net realizable value upon classification as held for sale.

77

Following is the activity in assets held for sale during the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)  Number of Vessels   2020   Number of Vessels   2019   Number of Vessels   2018 
                         

Beginning balance

  46  $39,287   0  $0   0  $0 

Additions

  32   97,664   46   66,033   0   0 

Sales

  (53)  (26,877)  0   0   0   0 

Reactivation

  (2)  (500)  0   0   0   0 
Impairment     (75,177)     (26,746)     0 

Ending balance

  23  $34,397   46  $39,287   0  $0 

Following is the summary of vessel sales and the gains on sales of vessels for the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 
             

Vessels sold from active fleet

  3   40   38 

Gain on sale of active vessels, net

 $1,217  $2,434  $10,935 
             

Vessels sold from assets held for sale

  53   0   0 

Gain on vessels sold from assets held for sale, net

 $6,384  $0  $0 

Total vessels sold

  56   40   38 

Total gain on sales of vessels, net

 $7,601  $2,434  $10,935 

During the year December 31, 2020, we recorded $75.2 million in impairment related to our assets held for sale.  We consider the valuation approach for our assets held for sale to be a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the level of estimation involved in valuing assets to be recycled or sold.  We determined the fair value of the vessels held for sale using two methodologies depending on the vessel and on our planned method of disposition.  We designated certain vessels to be recycled and valued those vessels using recycling yard pricing schedules based on dollars per ton. We generally value vessels that will be sold rather than recycled at the midpoint of a value range based on sales agreements or using comparative sales in the marketplace. We do not separate our asset impairment expense by segment because of the significant movement of our assets between segments.

In conjunction with our review of conditions that would indicate potential impairment in the value of our assets, we identified certain obsolete marine service and vessel supplies and parts inventory and charged $2.9 million and $5.2 million, respectively, of impairment expense for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019. We considered this valuation approach to be a Level 3 fair value measurement due to the level of estimation involved in valuing obsolete inventory.

In 2011, we contracted with a Brazilian shipyard to construct a vessel that was not completed. We initiated arbitration proceedings seeking completion of the hull or rescission of the contract and the return of funds.  In response, the shipyard initiated a separate lawsuit seeking the amounts due under the contract.  As of the fresh-start date, we recorded $1.8 million in other assets which represented the unimpaired balance of the construction costs that were expected to be returned to us once the dispute was resolved. During 2019, our final appeal was denied and the case was remanded back to the original courts. Our local counsel informed us that it was  now more likely that not that the shipyard would prevail in the dispute and that we would be liable for the additional payment of $4.0 million.   As a result, a $5.8 million expense was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2019.In 2020 the dispute with the shipyard was settled.  We conveyed the ownership of the partially completed vessel to the shipyard in exchange for a release of any and all obligations under the contract with the shipyard.  Accordingly, a $4.0 million credit was recorded in the fourth quarter of 2020, as no additional amounts are payable under the contract to the shipyard.

Impairments incurred during the last three years are primarily the result of our customers' reduction in offshore exploration and production expenditures caused by the ongoing and sustained low levels of crude oil and natural gas prices as well as our efforts to reduce the oversupply of vessels which currently exists in the offshore supply vessel market through the sale and recycling of vessels.

Following is a summary of impairment of vessels in our active fleet, assets held for sale, marine service and vessel supplies and other impairment and costs during the years ended December 31:

(Dollars in thousands)  Number of Vessels   2020   Number of Vessels   2019   Number of Vessels   2018 
                         

Active vessels

  0  $0   0  $0   56  $61,132 

Assets held for sale

  47   75,177   35   26,746   0   0 

Obsolete inventory

  0   2,959   0   5,223   0   0 

Other

  0   (4,027)  0   5,804   0   0 
Total impairment and other expense     $74,109      $37,773      $61,132 

In early 2020, it became evident that a novel coronavirus originating in Asia (COVID-19) could become a pandemic with worldwide reach.  By mid- March, when the World Health Organization declared the outbreak to be a pandemic (the COVID-19 pandemic), much of the industrialized world had initiated severe measures to lessen its impact.  The ongoing COVID-19 pandemic created significant volatility, uncertainty, and economic disruption during the first quarter of 2020.  With respect to our particular sector, the COVID-19 pandemic resulted in a much lower demand for oil as national, regional, and local governments imposed travel restrictions, border closings, restrictions on public gatherings, stay at home orders, and limitations on business operations in order to contain its spread.  During this same time period, oil-producing countries struggled to reach consensus on worldwide production levels, resulting in both a market oversupply of oil and a precipitous fall in oil prices. Combined, these conditions adversely affected our operations and business beginning in the latter part of the first quarter of 2020 and continuing throughout the remainder of the year. The reduction in demand for hydrocarbons together with an unprecedented decline in the price of oil has resulted in our primary customers, the oil and gas companies, making material reductions to their planned spending on offshore projects, compounding the effect of the virus on offshore operations. Further, these conditions, separately or together, are expected to continue to impact the demand for our services, the utilization and/or rates we can achieve for our assets and services, and the outlook for our industry in general.

In the first and second quarters of 2020, we considered these events to be indicators that the value of our active offshore vessel fleet may be impaired.  As a result, as of March 31, 2020 and  June 30, 2020 , we performed Step 1 evaluations of our active offshore fleet under FASB Accounting Standards Codification 360, which governs the methodology for identifying and recording impairment of long-lived assets to determine if any of our asset groups have net book value in excess of undiscounted future net cash flows. Our evaluations did not indicate impairment of any of our asset groups.  During the third quarter conditions related to the pandemic and oil price environment did not worsen from the second quarter and in the fourth quarter industry conditions marginally improved compared with the third quarter.  As a result, we did not identify additional events or conditions that would require us to perform a Step 1 evaluation during either quarter.  We will continue to monitor the expected future cash flows and the fair market value of our asset groups for impairment.

Please refer to Note (1) for a discussion of our accounting policy for accounting for the impairment of long-lived assets.

(9)

EMPLOYEE RETIREMENT PLANS

Defined Benefit Pension Plan

We have a defined benefit pension plan (pension plan) that covers certain U.S. employees that are citizens or permanent residents of the United States. Benefits are based on years of service and employee compensation. On December 31, 2010, the pension plan was frozen and accrual of benefits was discontinued. We contributed $1.1 million to the plan during the year ended December 31, 2019. We did not contribute to the plan during the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2018, respectively. We may contribute to this plan in 2021, but the amount, if any, has not been determined.

77

We had defined benefit pension plans that covered a small number of current and former Norwegian employees.  Benefits were based on years of service and employee compensation.  All of our Norwegian plan participants were transferred from our defined benefit plans primarily into a defined contribution plan during 2020.  Amounts contributed to these defined benefit plans were immaterial during the three years ended December 31, 2020. 

Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

We also offer a non-contributory, defined benefit supplemental executive retirement plan (supplemental plan) that provides pension benefits to certain employees in excess of those allowed under our tax-qualified pension plan. The supplemental plan was closed to new participation in 2010 and was amended to freeze all previously accrued pension benefits and discontinue the accrual of future benefits and any other contributions effective January 1, 2018. We contributed $1.6 million, $3.2 million and $0.9 million during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Any future accrual of benefits under the supplemental plan or other contributions to the supplemental plan will be determined at our sole discretion.

A Rabbi Trust was established to provide us with a vehicle to invest in a variety of marketable securities.  In April 2018, a lump sum distribution of $8.9 million was paid to our retiring President and Chief Executive Officer in settlement of his supplemental executive retirement plan obligation, resulting in a settlement loss of $0.3 million. This distribution was funded by substantially all of the investments held by the Rabbi Trust which was liquidated in 2019.

Postretirement Benefit Plan

Qualified retired employees were covered by a program which provided limited health care and life insurance benefits. This plan terminated on January 1, 2019 resulting in a gain of $4.0 million that we recorded in the year ended December 31, 2018. Costs of the program were based on actuarially determined amounts and were accrued over the period from the date of hire to the full eligibility date of employees who were expected to qualify for these benefits. This plan was funded as benefits were paid.

Investment Strategies

U.S. Pension Plan

The obligations of our pension plan are supported by assets held in a trust for the payment of benefits. We are obligated to adequately fund the trust. For the pension plan assets, we have the following primary investment objectives: (1) closely match the cash flows from the plan’s investments from interest payments and maturities with the long-term financial obligations from the plan’s liabilities; and (2) enhance the plan’s investment returns without taking on undue risk by industries, maturities or geographies of the underlying investment holdings.

The plan has historically invested in a fixed income only strategy, however because interest rates are forecasted by the United States (U.S.) Federal Reserve to remain low through 2023, it was determined in 2020 that the portfolio should be more broadly diversified.  The pension plan’s current target rate of return is 150 basis points above the simple average of the Bloomberg Barclays US Aggregate Bond Index return and the total return of the S&P 500 including dividends.

The fixed income portion of the pension plan investment portfolio will be approximately 50% and is comprised primarily of US Government bonds.  The remainder of the portfolio will include a well-diversified structure that will include a wide array of asset classes comprised of domestic equities with a small percentage allocated to foreign markets.  Alternative investments are allowed but may not exceed 25% of the market value of the portfolio.  Illiquid equity holdings, private placements or restricted equities are not permissible investments for the plan.

The cash flow requirements of the pension plan are analyzed at least annually. The plan does not invest in Tidewater stock.

Our policy for the pension plan is to contribute no less than the minimum required contribution by law and no more than the maximum deductible amount. The pension plan assets are periodically evaluated for concentration risks. As of December 31,2020, we did not have any individual asset investments that comprised 10% or more of each plan’s overall assets.

78

U.S. Pension Plan Asset Allocations

The following table provides the target and actual asset allocations for the pension plan:

      

Actual as of

  

Actual as of

 
  

Target

  

December 31, 2020

  

December 31, 2019

 

U.S. Pension plan:

            
Cash  0%  3%  0%

Debt securities

  50%  53%  96%

Equity securities

  50%  44%  4%

Total

  100%  100%  100%

Fair Value of Pension Plans Assets

Tidewater’s plan assets are accounted for at fair value and are classified within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement, with the exception of investments for which fair value is measured using the net asset value per share expedient.

The following table provides the fair value hierarchy for our domestic pension plan measured at fair value as of December 31, 2020:

      

Quoted prices in

  

Significant

  

Significant

     
      

active

  

observable

  

unobservable

  

Measured at

 
      

markets

  

inputs

  

inputs

  

Net Asset

 

(In thousands)

 

Fair Value

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

  

Value

 

Pension plan measured at fair value:

                    

Equity securities, primarily exchange traded funds

 $24,947   21,780   0   0   3,167 

Debt securities, primarily exchange traded funds

  29,922   17,925   0   0   11,997 

Cash and cash equivalents

  1,626   0   1,626   0   0 

Total fair value of plan assets

 $56,495   39,705   1,626   0   15,164 

79

The fair value hierarchy for the pension plans assets measured at fair value as of December 31,2019, are as follows:

      

Quoted prices in

  

Significant

  

Significant

     
      

active

  

observable

  

unobservable

  

Measured at

 
      

markets

  

inputs

  

inputs

  

Net Asset

 

(In thousands)

 

Fair Value

  

(Level 1)

  

(Level 2)

  

(Level 3)

  

Value

 

Pension plan measured at fair value:

                    

Equity securities:

 $699   699   0   0   0 

Debt securities:

                    

Government securities

  5,870   5,870   0   0   0 

Collateralized mortgage securities

  765   0   765   0   0 

Corporate debt securities

  47,839   0   47,839   0   0 

Cash and cash equivalents

  2,526   0   2,526   0   0 

Other

  1,396   0   1,396   0   0 

Total

 $59,095   6,569   52,526   0   0 

Accrued income

  530   530   0   0   0 

Total fair value of plan assets

 $59,625   7,099   52,526   0   0 

Plan Assets and Obligations

Changes in combined plan assets and obligations and the funded status of the U.S. defined benefit pension plan, Norway’s defined benefit pension plan (discontinued in the fourth quarter of 2020), and the supplemental plan (Pension Benefits) and the postretirement health care and life insurance plan (Other Benefits), which was discontinued as of January 1, 2019, are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Change in benefit obligation:

            

Benefit obligation at beginning of the period

 $91,654  $90,247  $103,443 

Increase in benefit obligation due to business combination

  0   0   5,474 

Service cost

  112   427   294 

Interest cost

  2,907   3,751   3,605 

Benefits paid

  (5,990)  (5,967)  (5,467)

Actuarial (gain) loss (A)

  5,277   8,198   (8,105)

Settlement

  (4,407)  (4,978)  (8,885)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

  (593)  (24)  (112)

Benefit obligation at end of the period

 $88,960  $91,654  $90,247 

Change in plan assets:

            

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the period

 $59,625  $56,790  $57,536 

Increase in plan assets due to business combination

  0   0   5,463 

Actual return

  6,890   7,498   (2,128)

Expected return

  0   0   112 

Actuarial loss

  18   983   (275)

Administrative expenses

  (49)  (68)  (36)

Employer contributions

  1,615   5,027   10,546 

Benefits paid

  (5,990)  (5,967)  (5,467)

Settlement

  (5,000)  (4,638)  (8,885)

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

  (614)  0   (76)

Fair value of plan assets at end of the period

  56,495   59,625   56,790 

Payroll tax unrecognized in benefit obligation at end of the period

  0   0   84 

Unfunded status at end of the period

 $(32,465) $(32,029) $(33,541)

Net amount recognized in the balance sheet consists of:

            

Current liabilities

 $(1,524) $(1,422) $(1,380)

Noncurrent liabilities

  (30,941)  (30,607)  (32,161)

Net amount recognized

 $(32,465) $(32,029) $(33,541)

     (A) The change in the actuarial (gain) loss for the three years ended December 31, 2020 was primarily attributable to changes in the discount rate.

80

 
  

Other Benefits

 
  

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2018

 

Change in benefit obligation:

    

Benefit obligation at beginning of the period

 $2,924 

Service cost

  61 

Interest cost

  117 

Participant contributions

  218 

Plan amendment

  (2,954)

Benefits paid

  (595)

Actuarial loss

  229 

Benefit obligation at end of the period

 $0 

Change in plan assets:

    

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of the period

 $0 

Employer contributions

  377 

Participant contributions

  218 

Benefits paid

  (595)

Fair value of plan assets at end of the period

  0 

Unfunded status at end of the period

 $0 

The following table provides combined information for pension plans with an accumulated benefit obligation in excess of plan assets (includes both the pension plans and supplemental plan):

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Projected benefit obligation

 $88,960  $91,654 

Accumulated benefit obligation

  88,960   91,109 

Fair value of plan assets

  56,495   59,625 

Net periodic combined benefit cost for the pension plans and the supplemental plan include the following components:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Service cost

 $109  $427   294 

Interest cost

  2,907   3,751   3,605 

Expected return on plan assets

  (2,191)  (2,375)  (2,042)

Administrational expenses

  49   71   36 

Payroll tax of net pension costs

  14   55   42 

Amortization of net actuarial losses

  (5)  (592)  30 

Recognized actuarial loss

  0   0   0 

Settlement/Curtailment (gain) loss

  738   (219)  335 

Net periodic pension cost

 $1,621  $1,118   2,300 

Net periodic benefit cost for the postretirement health care and life insurance plan, which was discontinued as of January 1, 2019, includes the following components:

  

Year Ended

 

(In thousands)

 

December 31, 2018

 

Service cost

 $61 

Interest cost

  117 

Amortization of prior service cost

  (299)

Recognized actuarial loss

  42 

Net curtailment gain

  (4,005)

Net periodic postretirement benefit

 $(4,084)

81

The components of the net periodic combined pension cost and the net periodic combined postretirement benefit, except for the service costs are included in the caption “Interest income and other, net.” Service costs are included in the caption “Vessel operating costs.”

Other changes in combined plan assets and benefit obligations recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss include the following components:

  

Pension Benefits

 
  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Net (gain) loss

 $(568) $2,612   (3,441)

Settlement recognized

  0   (182)  (335)

Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss, before tax and net of tax

 $(568) $2,430   (3,776)

  

Other Benefits

 
  

Year

 
  

Ended

 
  

December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2018

 

Net (gain) loss

 $229 

Amortization of prior service (cost) credit

  1,861 

Amortization of net (loss) gain

  (554)

Total recognized in other comprehensive (income) loss, before tax and net of tax

 $1,536 

We do not expect to recognize any unrecognized actuarial (loss) gain or unrecognized prior service credit (cost) as a component of net periodic benefit costs during the next year.

Discount rates of 2.5% and 3.5% were used to determine net benefit obligations as of December 2020 and 2019, respectively.

Assumptions used to determine net periodic benefit costs are as follows:

  

Pension Benefits

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Discount rate

  3.5%  4.5%

Expected long-term rate of return on assets

  4.0%  4.0%

Rates of annual increase in compensation levels

  2.3%  2.8%

To develop the expected long-term rate of return on assets assumption, we considered the current level of expected returns on various asset classes. The expected return for each asset class was then weighted based on the target asset allocation to develop the expected return on plan assets assumption for the portfolio.

82

Based upon the assumptions used to measure our qualified pension benefit obligations at December 31,2020, we expect that combined benefits to be paid over the next ten years will be as follows:

  

Pension

 

Year ending December 31, (In thousands)

 

Benefits

 

2021

 $5,860 

2022

  5,833 

2023

  5,777 

2024

  5,762 

2025

  5,686 
2026 – 2030  26,605 

Total 10-year estimated future benefit payments

 $55,523 

Defined Contribution Plans

We have two defined contribution plans described below.

Retirement Contributions

Prior to 2019, all eligible U.S. fleet personnel received retirement contributions. This benefit was noncontributory by the employee, but we contributed, in cash, 3% of an eligible employee’s compensation to a trust on behalf of the employees. Our contributions vested over five years. We ceased contributing to the employee retirement plan effective January 1,2018. Any future employer contributions to this plan will be determined at our discretion.

401(k) Savings Contribution

Upon meeting various citizenship, age and service requirements, employees are eligible to participate in a defined contribution savings plan and can contribute from 2% to 75% of their base salary to an employee benefit trust. Prior to January 1, 2018, we matched, in cash, 50% of the first 8% of eligible compensation deferred by the employee. Company contributions vest over five years. Any future employer contributions to this plan will be determined at our discretion.

The plan held no shares of Tidewater common stock for the years ended December 31, 2020 and 2019, respectively, but held 7,075 shares Tidewater Common Stock for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Other Plans

A non-qualified supplemental savings plan is provided to executive officers who have the opportunity to defer additional eligible compensation that cannot be deferred under the existing 401(k) plan due to IRS limitations. An optional company match or contribution of restoration benefits was ceased effective January 1,2018.

We also provided retirement benefits to our eligible non-U.S. citizen employees working outside their respective country of origin pursuant to a self-directed multinational defined contribution retirement plan (multinational retirement plan).  Non-U.S. citizen shore-based and certain offshore employees working outside their respective country of origin were eligible to participate in the multinational retirement plan provided the employees were not enrolled in any home country pension or retirement program.  Participants of the multinational retirement plan could contribute 1% to 50% of their base salary.  Prior to January 1, 2018 when we ceased contributing to this plan, we matched, in cash, 50% of the first 6% of eligible compensation deferred by the employee which vests over five years.

Multi-employer Pension Obligations

Certain of our current and former U.K. subsidiaries are participating in two multi-employer retirement funds known as the Merchant Navy Officers Pension Fund, or MNOPF and the Merchant Navy Ratings Pension Fund or MNRPF.  At December 31,2020 and 2019, we had recorded $0.7 million and $1.0 million, respectively, related to these liabilities. The status of the funds is calculated by an actuarial firm approximately every three years. The last assessment was completed in March 2018 for the MNOPF Plan and March 2017 for the MNRPF Plan. We expense $0.2 million per annum for these plans.

(10)STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION AND INCENTIVE PLANS

Our long-term incentive plans have included restricted stock units (RSUs), stock options and phantom stock.  As of December 31, 2020, the Tidewater Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”) and the GulfMark Management Incentive Plan (“Legacy GLF Plan”) are our only two active equity incentive plans and the only types of awards outstanding under either plan are RSUs and stock options that settle in shares of Tidewater common stock.

The number of common stock shares reserved for issuance under the plans and the number of shares available for future grants are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Shares of common stock reserved for issuance under the plans

  3,973,228   3,973,228   3,973,228 

Shares of common stock available for future grants

  1,591,577   2,187,101   2,325,102 

Restricted Stock Units

We have granted RSUs to key employees, including officers and non-employee directors. We have generally awarded time-based units, where each unit represents the right to receive, at the end of a vesting period, one unrestricted share of Tidewater common stock with no exercise price. 

We have also awarded performance-based RSUs, where each unit represents the right to receive, at the end of a vesting period, up to two shares of Tidewater common stock with no exercise price based on various operating and financial metrics. The fair value of the performance-based and time-based RSUs is based on the market price of our common stock on the date of grant. The restrictions onAll of the time-based RSUs awarded to key employees lapse over a three-year period from the date of the award. The restrictions on the time-based RSUs awarded to non-employee directors lapse over a one-year period. Time-based RSUs require no goals to be achieved other than the passage of time and continued employment. The restrictions on the performance-based restricted stock units lapse if we meet specific targets as defined. During the restricted period, the RSUs may not be transferred or encumbered, but the recipient has the right to receive dividend equivalents on the restricted stock units, and there are no voting rights until the restricted stock units vest. If dividends are declared, dividend equivalents are accrued on performance-based restricted shares and ultimately paid only if the performance criteria are achieved. RSU compensation costs are recognized on a straight-line basis over the vesting period, and are net of forfeitures.

RSUs granted to officers and employees under the 2017 Incentive Plan generally have a vesting period over three years in equal installments from the date of grant, except that (i) the RSUs granted to directors vest over one year and (ii) certain RSUs granted to our officers are performance based andduring fiscal 2020 will vest on the thirdfirst anniversary of the date of grant, based on our performance as measured.

84

The following table sets forthprovided the director remains a summary of our restricted stock unit activity:

  

Weighted-average

  

Time

  

Weight-average

     
  

Grant-Date

  

Based

  

Grant Date

  

Performance

 
  

Fair Value

  

Units

  

Fair Value

  

Based Units

 

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2017

  24.41   1,157,646   0   0 

Granted

  24.58   455,063   26.04   63,365 

Vested

  24.84   (503,677)  0   0 

Cancelled/forfeited

  27.15   (27,948)  0   0 

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2018

  24.21   1,081,084   26.04   63,365 

Granted

  23.44   186,143   24.50   101,143 

Vested

  24.45   (784,868)  0   0 

Cancelled/forfeited

  24.70   (78,591)  24.50   (70,694)

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2019

  23.32   403,768   25.54   93,814 

Granted

  5.95   594,234   0   0 

Vested

  24.05   (265,919)  26.04   (63,365)

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2020

  8.95   732,083   24.50   30,449 

Restrictions on 449,870 time-based units outstanding at December 31, 2020 will lapse during fiscal 2021.

Restricted stock unit compensation expense and grant date fair value are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Grant date fair value of restricted stock units vested

 $6,395  $19,193  $12,513 

Restricted stock unit compensation expense

  5,117   19,603   13,406 

As of December 31,2020, total unrecognized RSU compensation costs totaled approximately $4.7 million, or $3.7 million net of tax which will be recognized over a weighted average period of two years, compared to $6.3 million, or $5.0 million net of tax, at December 31, 2019 and $22.6 million, $17.1 million, net of tax, at December 31, 2018. No RSU compensation costs were capitalized as partmember of the costsboard on the vesting date. However, vesting of an asset. The amount of unrecognized RSU compensation costs will be affected by any future restricted stock unit grants and by the separation of an employee who has received RSUs that are unvested as of their separation date. There were no modificationsaward would accelerate if, prior to the RSUs duringvesting date, the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019director died, terminated service due to disability, or was willing and 2018. Forfeitures are recognizedable to continue to serve as a director but was either not renominated or not reelected to serve another term.

Director Stock Election Program. Under this program, each non-employee director is provided an adjustmentopportunity to compensation expense for all RSUs in the same period as the forfeitures occur.

Stock Option Plan

Tidewater has 344,598 stock options that were granted in 2020 all of which are outstanding as of December 31, 2020.  The weighted average exercise price was $6.48, with a weighted average remaining contractual term of 9.3 years.  The stock options vest ratably over a three-year period and have a life of ten years.   None of the stock options have been forfeited or exercised or are exercisable.  As of December 31, 2020, there was $0.9 million of unrecognized compensation costs related to the stock options that is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.3 years.

Phantom Stock Plan

We previously provided a Phantom Stock Plan (PSP) to provide additional incentive compensation to key employees. Participants in the PSP had the rightelect to receive the valuea percentage of a share of common stockhis or her base cash retainer in cash at vesting. Participants had no voting or other rights as a stockholder. The phantom shares generally had a three-year vesting period. No new awards have been issued under the Phantom Stock Plan since 2016.

The following table sets forth a summary of our phantom stock activity:

  

Weighted-

      

Weighted-

      

Weighted-

     
  

average

  

Time

  

average

      

average

     
  

Grant-Date

  

Based

  

Grant-Date

  

Series A

  

Grant-Date

  

Series B

 
  

Fair Value

  

Shares

  

Fair Value

  

Warrants

  

Fair Value

  

Warrants

 

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2017

 $308.24   13,526   1.00   21,934   0.98   23,712 

Vested

  360.14   (8,223)  1.00   (13,009)  0.98   (14,064)

Cancelled

  240.39   (786)  1.00   (1,275)  0.98   (1,379)

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2018

 $226.50   4,517   1.00   7,650   2.94   8,269 

Vested

  226.50   (4,517)  1.00   (7,650)  2.94   (8,269)

Non-vested balance at December 31, 2019

 $0   0   0   0   0   0 

The grant date fair value of phantom stock vested was $1.1 million and $3.0 million, respectively, for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. Phantom stock compensation expense was immaterial for both years.

85

(11)

STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common Stock

The number of shares of authorized and issued common stock and preferred stock are as follows:

  

December 31,

  

December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

 

Common stock shares authorized

  125,000,000   125,000,000 

Common stock par value

 $0.001  $0.001 

Common stock shares issued

  40,704,984   39,941,327 

Preferred stock shares authorized

  3,000,000   3,000,000 

Preferred stock par value

 

No par

  

No par

 

Preferred stock shares issued

  0   0 

Common Stock Repurchases

No shares were repurchased during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Dividend Program

There were no dividends declared during the years ended December 31, 2020, 2019 and 2018.

Warrants

During 2017, we issued 11,543,814 New Creditor Warrants upon emergence from bankruptcy. In addition, 2,432,432 Series A Warrants and 2,629,657 Series B Warrants were issued to the holders of common stock with exercise prices of $57.06 and $62.28, respectively. As of December 31, 2020, we had 657,203 shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of the New Creditor Warrants. No Series A Warrants or Series B Warrants have been exercised.

In conjunction with the merger with GulfMark, Tidewater assumed approximately 2.3 million $0.01 Creditor Warrants (GLF Creditor Warrants) and approximately 0.8 million Equity Warrants (GLF Equity Warrants) with an exercise price of $100 and each warrant becoming exercisable for 1.1fully-vested shares of Tidewater common stock, which are issued from our equity compensation plans. For each participant, the shares are issued to director on substantially the same terms and conditions as providedday on which he or she would have received the cash payment, based on the closing price of a share on that day (rounded down to the nearest whole share). None of our directors elected to participate in the warrant agreements governingprogram during 2020.

Stock Ownership Guidelines. Our non-employee directors are subject to stock ownership guidelines requiring each director to own and hold company stock worth five times his or her annual cash retainer no later than five years after his or her appointment. Under the GLF Creditor Warrants and the GLF Equity Warrants. As of December 31, 2020, we had 815,575guidelines, unvested RSUs count as shares of company common stock issuable uponstock. Of our six non-employee directors, each of Messrs. Fagerstal and Rigdon has until August 1, 2022 to comply with the exerciseguidelines while each of Messrs. Raspino and Traub have until November 15, 2023, Ms. Zabrocky has until July 28, 2025, and Mr. Anderson has until September 8, 2025 to comply with the guidelines. These guidelines are described in greater detail under “Compensation Discussion and Analysis – Other Compensation and Equity Ownership Policies – Stock Ownership Guidelines.”
Other Benefits. We reimburse all directors for reasonable travel and other out-of-pocket expenses incurred in connection with attendance at meetings of the GLF Creditor Warrants. NaN GLF Equity Warrants have been exercised.

board of directors and its committees. We also cover the cost of our directors attending continuing education programs (including tuition and travel).
86
38

Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive income by component, net of tax, are as follows:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Balance at December 31

 $(236) $2,194  $(147)
Pension benefits recognized in OCI  (568)  (2,430)  4,133 

Available for sale securities recognized in OCI

  0   0   (660)

Reclasses from OCI to net income

  0   0   (1,132)

Balance at December 31

 $(804) $(236) $2,194 

The following table summarizes the reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to the consolidated statement of income:

Year

Ended

December 31,

Affected line item in the consolidated

(In thousands)

2018

statements of income

Retiree medical plan

(1,536)

Interest income and other, net

Realized gains on available for sale securities

404

Interest and other debt costs

Total pre-tax and net of tax amounts

(1,132)

Tax Benefits Preservation Plan

On April 13, 2020, we adopted a Tax Benefits Preservation Plan (the Plan) as a measure to protect our existing net operating loss carryforwards ($320.7 million at December 31, 2020) and foreign tax credits ($387.4 million at December 31, 2020) (Tax Attributes) and to reduce our potential future tax liabilities.  Use of our Tax Attributes will be substantially limited if we experience an “ownership change” as defined in Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code (Section 382).

While the Plan is in effect, any person or group that acquires beneficial ownership of 4.99% or more of our common stock then outstanding without approval from our Board of Directors (the Board) or without meeting certain customary exceptions would be subject to significant dilution in their ownership interest in our company. Stockholders who currently own 4.99% or more of our outstanding common stock will not trigger the Plan unless they acquire 0.5% or more additional shares of common stock.

Pursuant to the Plan, 1 right will be distributed to our stockholders for each share of our common stock owned of record at the close of business on April 24,2020. Each right would initially represent the right to purchase from the Company one one-thousandth of a share of our Series A Junior Participating Preferred Stock, no par value (the “Preferred Stock”) at a purchase price of $38.00 per one one-thousandth of a share. The preferred stock will entitle the holder to exercise voting rights, receive dividends, participate in distributions and to have the benefit of all other rights of holders of preferred stock. The Board may redeem the rights in whole, but not in part, for $0.001 per right (subject to adjustment) at any time prior to the close of business on the tenth business day after the first date of public announcement that any person or group has triggered the Plan.

The rights will expire on the earliest of (i) the close of business on April 13,2023, (ii) the time at which the rights are redeemed or exchanged, or (iii) the time at which the Board determines that the Tax Attributes are fully utilized, expired, no longer necessary or become limited under Section 382.

(12)COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Lease Commitments

As of December 31, 2018, we had long-term operating leases for office space, automobiles, temporary residences and office equipment. Aggregate operating lease expenses for the year ended December 31, 2018 were $3.8 million.

Currency Devaluation and Fluctuation Risk

Due to our international operations, we are exposed to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations and exchange rate risks on all charter hire contracts denominated in foreign currencies. For some of our international contracts, a portion of the revenue and local expenses are incurred in local currencies with the result that we are at risk of changes in the exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. We generally do not hedge against any foreign currency rate fluctuations associated with foreign currency contracts that arise in the normal course of business, which exposes us to the risk of exchange rate losses. To minimize the financial impact of these items, we attempt to contract a significant majority of our services in U.S. dollars. In addition, we attempt to minimize the financial impact of these risks by matching the currency of the company’s operating costs with the currency of the revenue streams when considered appropriate. We continually monitor the currency exchange risks associated with all contracts not denominated in U.S. dollars.

87

Legal Proceedings

Various legal proceedings and claims are outstanding which arose in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these actions, will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations, or cash flows.

(13)

ACCRUED EXPENSES, OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES, AND OTHER LIABILITIES

A summary of accrued expenses as of December 31, is as follows:

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Payroll and related payables

 $17,201  $16,351 

Accrued vessel expenses

  17,129   38,383 

Accrued interest expense

  3,240   4,570 

Other accrued expenses

  14,852   14,696 
  $52,422  $74,000 

A summary of other current liabilities as of December 31, is as follows:

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Taxes payable

 $23,883  $18,661 

Other

  8,902   5,439 
  $32,785  $24,100 

A summary of other liabilities as of December 31, is as follows:

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

 

Pension liabilities

 $31,736  $32,545 

Liability for uncertain tax positions

  35,304   48,577 

Other

  12,752   17,275 
  $79,792  $98,397 

88

(14)SEGMENT INFORMATION, GEOGRAPHICAL DATA AND MAJOR CUSTOMERS

Operating business segments are defined as a component of an enterprise for which separate financial information is available and is evaluated by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance.

The following table provides a comparison of revenues, vessel operating profit, depreciation and amortization, and additions to properties and equipment. Vessel revenues and operating costs relate to our owned and operated vessels while other operating revenues relate to the activities of our other miscellaneous marine-related businesses.

  

Year Ended December 31,

 

(In thousands)

 

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Revenues:

            

Vessel revenues:

            

Americas

 $126,676   136,958   118,534 

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  97,133   90,321   80,195 

Europe/Mediterranean

  83,602   123,711   56,263 

West Africa

  78,763   126,025   142,214 
  $386,174   477,015   397,206 

Other operating revenues

  10,864   9,534   9,314 
  $397,038   486,549   406,520 

Vessel operating profit (loss):

            

Americas

 $4,944   (805)  8,860 

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  (5,935)  (6,044)  (4,417)

Europe/Mediterranean

  (8,629)  (1,289)  (9,359)

West Africa

  (27,508)  8,298   7,240 
  $(37,128)  160   2,324 

Other operating profit

  7,458   6,734   3,742 
   (29,670)  6,894   6,066 

Corporate expenses

 $(35,633)  (57,988)  (42,972)

Gain on asset dispositions, net

  7,591   2,263   10,624 
Affiliate credit loss impairment expense  (52,981)  0   0 
Affiliate guarantee obligation  (2,000)  0   0 

Impairment of due from affiliate

  0   0   (20,083)

Asset impairments and other

  (74,109)  (37,773)  (61,132)

Operating loss

 $(186,802)  (86,604)  (107,497)

Depreciation and amortization:

            

Americas

 $32,079   27,493   16,047 

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  24,244   21,440   11,871 

Europe/Mediterranean

  29,222   30,053   11,385 

West Africa

  27,787   21,166   16,612 

Corporate and other

  3,377   1,779   2,378 
  $116,709   101,931   58,293 

Additions to properties and equipment:

            

Americas

 $2,842   969   3,771 

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  2,629   5,237   2,982 

Europe/Mediterranean

  1,059   4,001   185 

West Africa

  6,028   2,721   10,135 

Corporate

  2,342   5,070   4,318 
  $14,900   17,998   21,391 

Total assets:

            

Americas

 $338,649   375,297   380,168 

Middle East/Asia Pacific

  226,422   270,413   233,611 

Europe/Mediterranean

  302,214   358,943   316,524 

West Africa

  242,825   376,087   483,234 

Investments in and advances to unconsolidated companies and other

  0   0   8,479 

Corporate

  141,067   198,788   405,723 
  $1,251,177   1,579,528   1,827,739 

The following table discloses our customers that accounted for 10% or more of total revenues:

  

Year Ended December 31,

 
  

2020

  

2019

  

2018

 

Chevron Corporation

  14.3%  13.0%  15.0%
Saudi Aramco  11.5%  *   * 

* Less than 10% of total revenues.

89

(15)

RESTRUCTURING CHARGES

In the fourth quarter of 2018, we finalized plans to abandon duplicate office facilities with lease terms expiring between 2023 and 2026 in St. Rose and New Orleans, Louisiana, Houston, Texas and Aberdeen, Scotland. Those closures resulted in $7.3 million, $6.8 million and $1.5 million respectively, of lease exit and severance charges in the fourth quarter of 2018 and the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2020, respectively. These charges are included in general and administrative expense in our consolidated Statement of Operations.

Activity for the lease exit and severance liabilities for the two years ended December 31, 2020 were:

  

Lease Exit Costs

  

Severance

     
  

Europe/

             

(In thousands)

 

Mediterranean

  

Corporate

  

Company

  

Total

 

Balance at December 31, 2018

 $2,005   4,463   285  $6,753 

Charges (credits)

  44   (33)  6,811   6,822 

Cash payments

  (258)  (2,112)  (6,824)  (9,194)

Balance at December 31, 2019

 $1,791   2,318   272  $4,381 

Charges

  71   63   1,367   1,501 

Cash payments

  (306)  (602)  (1,639)  (2,547)

Balance at December 31, 2020

 $1,556   1,779   0  $3,335 

 

SCHEDULE II

TIDEWATER INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

Valuation and Qualifying Accounts

(In thousands)

              

Balance

 
  

Balance at

          

at

 
  

Beginning

  

Additions

      

End of

 

Description

 

of period

  

at Cost

  

Deductions

  

Period

 

Year Ended December 31, 2018

                

Deducted in balance sheet from trade accounts receivables:

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $1,800   900   0   2,700 

Year Ended December 31, 2019

                

Deducted in balance sheet from trade accounts receivables:

                

Allowance for doubtful accounts

 $2,700   0   2,630   70 

Year Ended December 31, 2020

                

Deducted in balance sheet from trade accounts receivables:

                

Allowance for credit losses

 $70   1,446   0   1,516 

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are designed with the objective of ensuring that all information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act), such as this Annual Report on Form 10-K, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and chief financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, any control system, no matter how well conceived and followed, can provide only reasonable, and not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met.

As of the end of the period covered by this report, we have evaluated, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as amended). Based on that evaluation, our President, Chief Executive Officer, and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures are effective in timely alerting them to material information (including our consolidated subsidiaries) required to be disclosed in our reports which we file and submit under the Exchange Act.

MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Our internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to our management and Board of Directors regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020. In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control—Integrated Framework (2013). Based on our assessment we believe that, as of December 31, 2020, our internal control over financial reporting is effective based on those criteria.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

No changes in internal control over financial reporting or other factors that might significantly affect internal control over financial reporting, including any corrective actions taken by management with regard to significant deficiencies and material weaknesses, have occurred subsequent to December 31, 2019.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM         

To the shareholders and the Board of Directors of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries

Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the internal control over financial reporting of Tidewater Inc. and subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2020, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by COSO.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2020, of the Company and our report dated March 4, 2021, expressed an unqualified opinion on those financial statements.

Basis for Opinion

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

/s/ Deloitte & Touche LLP

Houston, Texas  

March 4, 2021  

PART III

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our 2021 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2020.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Information required by this item is incorporated by reference to our 2021 Proxy Statement, which will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2020.

ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Information required by this item

EQUITY COMPENSATION PLAN INFORMATION
The following table provides information as of December 31, 2020 about our equity compensation plans under which shares of common stock of the company are authorized for issuance:
Plan Category
Number of
securities to be
issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options
and rights(3)
(a)
Weighted-average
exercise price of
outstanding options
and rights(4)
(b)
Number of securities
remaining available
for future issuance
under plans (excluding
securities reflected in
column (a))(5)
(c)
Equity Compensation Plans Approved by Stockholders(1)
1,024,4396.48590,704
Equity Compensation Plans Not Approved by Stockholders(2)
82,691--656,275
Totals as of December 31, 2020
1,107,130
6.48
1,246,979
_________________________
(1)Represents shares subject to awards issued under the Tidewater Inc. 2017 Stock Incentive Plan (the “2017 Plan”).
(2)Represents shares subject to awards issued under the Tidewater Legacy GLF Management Incentive Plan, which we assumed in connection with the business combination (the “Legacy GLF Plan”). We describe this plan in further detail below.
(3)Represents the number of shares subject to outstanding stock options and the maximum number of shares that may be issued under restricted stock units (RSUs) currently outstanding under both the 2017 Plan and the Legacy GLF Plan (maximum of one share per time-based RSU and up to two shares per performance-based RSU, depending on the extent to which the performance conditions are met).
(4)Represents the weighted average exercise price for outstanding stock options. These options have a weighted average remaining contractual term of 9.5 years.
(5)Awards may be granted under either plan in the form of stock options, restricted stock, RSUs, or other cash- or equity- based awards.
Material Features of the Legacy GLF Plan. In connection with our 2018 business combination with GulfMark, we assumed the Legacy GLF Plan. Immediately following the closing, as converted in the business combination, a total of 924,351 shares of Tidewater common stock were authorized for issuance under the Plan, 88,479 of which were subject to then-outstanding equity awards. The number of share issuable under the Legacy GLF Plan is incorporated by referencesubject to adjustment in the event of a recapitalization, reclassification, stock dividend, stock split, combination of shares, or other similar change in our 2021 Proxy Statement, whichcommon stock. Following the closing, we may grant equity-based incentives under the Legacy GLF Plan to certain individuals who were not employees, officers, directors, and consultants of the company immediately prior to the closing. The Legacy GLF Plan will be filedadministered by the compensation committee of the board with respect to awards granted to employees and consultants of the SEC not latercompany and its subsidiaries. The board has the right to amend or discontinue the Legacy GLF Plan or to modify its terms and conditions; however, any amendment that would materially impair an outstanding award would require the award holder’s consent. No awards may be granted under the Legacy GLF Plan after April 13, 2028 although any awards that are outstanding at the time that the Legacy GLF Plan is terminated may remain outstanding in accordance with their terms.
39

SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS
The table below shows the name, address and stock ownership of each person known by us to beneficially own more than 120 days subsequent5% of our common stock as of April 12, 2021.
Name and Address of
Beneficial Owner
Amount and Nature of
Beneficial Ownership
Percent of Class(1)
T. Rowe Price Associates
         100 East Pratt Street
         Baltimore, Maryland 21202
6,835,243(2)
16.78%
Robert E. Robotti
c/o Robotti & Company, Incorporated
         60 East 42nd Street, Suite 3100
         New York, New York 10165
2,902,303(3)
7.06%
Moerus Capital Management, LLC
         307 West 38th Street, Suite 2003
         New York, New York 10018
2,679,898(4)
6.58%
BlackRock, Inc.
         55 East 52nd Street
         New York, New York 10055
2,534,014(5)
6.22%
Third Avenue Management LLC
         622 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor
         New York, New York 10017
2,513,675(6)
6.17%
American International Group, Inc.
         175 Water Street
         New York, New York 10038
2,391,291(7)
5.87%
The Vanguard Group
         100 Vanguard Blvd.
         Malvern, Pennsylvania 19355
2,144,296(8)
5.26%
________________
(1)Based on 40,731,777 shares of common stock outstanding on April 12, 2021, plus the number of any shares of common stock underlying the company’s warrants beneficially owned by the applicable beneficial owner.
(2)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 by T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc., a registered investment advisor (“Price Associates”), which has sole voting power over 2,431,246 shares and sole dispositive power over all reported shares. T. Rowe Price Mid-Cap Value Fund, Inc., a registered investment company sponsored by Price Associates, has sole voting power over 4,372,175 of the reported shares and no dispositive power over any of the reported shares.
(3)Based on a Schedule 13D/A filed with the SEC on March 12, 2021 by a group including Robert E. Robotti. Mr. Robotti has sole voting and dispositive power over 7,092 of the reported shares and he shares the power to vote or dispose of 2,895,211 of the reported shares with certain entities controlled by him and or certain clients of such controlled entities. Included in the total number of shares shown as beneficially owned are 1,074 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants held directly by Mr. Robotti and 387,700 shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants held directly owned by certain entities controlled by Mr. Robotti or advisory clients of certain entities controlled by Mr. Robotti.
40

(4)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 by Moerus Capital Management, LLC, which has sole voting power over 2,679,898 shares and sole dispositive power over 2,679,898 shares and shares voting power over 30,107 shares.
(5)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 1, 2021, by BlackRock, Inc., which has sole voting power over 2,494,214 shares and sole dispositive power over all reported shares.
(6)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 12, 2021 by Third Avenue Management LLC, which reports sole voting and dispositive power over all reported shares in its capacity as investment adviser to several investment companies.
(7)Based on a Schedule 13G/A filed with the SEC on February 16, 2021 by American International Group, Inc., which has sole voting and dispositive power over 2,341,223 shares and shares voting and dispositive power over the remaining 50,069 shares with its wholly-owned subsidiaries, SunAmerica Asset Management, LLC or Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company.
(8)Based on a Schedule 13G filed with the SEC on February 10, 2021 by The Vanguard Group, which has sole dispositive power over 2,105,115 shares and shares voting power over 26,710 shares and dispositive power over 39,181 shares.
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT
The following table sets forth the beneficial ownership of our common stock as of April 12, 2021 by each current director, by each executive officer named in the 2020 Summary Compensation Table (our “named executives” or “NEOs”), and by all current directors and executive officers as a group. Unless otherwise indicated, each person has sole voting and investment power with respect to December 31, 2020.

all shares of our common stock beneficially owned by him or her.

Name of Beneficial Owner
 
Amount and
Nature of
Beneficial
Ownership
  
Percent of
Class of
Common
Stock(1)
  
Restricted
Stock Units(2)
 
Current Directors
            
Darron M. Anderson(3)
  --   *   21,364 
Dick Fagerstal  21,541   *   27,000 
Quintin V. Kneen  236,711 (4)   *   207,583 
Louis A. Raspino  23,166   *   27,000 
Larry T. Rigdon  67,016 (5)   *   27,000 
Kenneth H. Traub  32,088   *   27,000 
Lois K. Zabrocky  --   *   27,000 
Named Executives(6)
            
Samuel R. Rubio  32,024 (4)   *   92,740 
David E. Darling  44,249 (4)   *   83,218 
Daniel A. Hudson  15,997 (4)   *   80,525 
All current directors and executive officers as a group (10 persons)
  472,792 (4)   1.15%   620,430 

*Less than 1.0%.
(1)Based on 40,731,777 shares of common stock outstanding on April 12, 2021 and includes for each person and group the number of shares that such person or group has the right to acquire within 60 days of such date.
41

(2)Reflects the number of restricted stock units held by each director or executive officer that will not vest within 60 days of April 12, 2021 and thus are not included in his or her beneficial ownership calculation.
(3)Mr. Anderson was appointed as a director effective September 8, 2020.
(4)The total number of shares shown as beneficially owned for each named executive and all current directors and executive officers as a group includes the following:
  
Shares Acquirable within 60 days upon
Exercise
  
Shares Subject to 
Time-Based RSUs
 
Named Executive
 
Legacy GLF Equity
Warrants
  
Stock
Options
  
vesting
within 60 days
 
Mr. Kneen  8,025   114,866   60,829 
Mr. Rubio  2,326   --   11,123 
Mr. Darling  --   --   11,123 
Mr. Hudson  --   --   11,776 

(5)Includes 30,000 shares held in an IRA for Mr. Rigdon’s benefit, over which he has sole voting and investment power.
(6)Information regarding shares beneficially owned by Mr. Kneen, who was a named executive for fiscal 2020 in addition to Messrs. Darling, Hudson, and Rubio, appears immediately above under the caption “Current Directors.”

ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE

Information

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Our practice has been that any transaction or relationship involving a related person which would require disclosure under Item 404(a) of Regulation S-K of the rules and regulations of the SEC will be reviewed and approved, or ratified, by our audit committee. We had one such transaction since the beginning of the last fiscal year.
Mr. Rigdon, a former executive who retired from the company in 2002, was appointed as an independent director on July 31, 2017 (the effective date of our restructuring) and currently serves as an independent director and our chairman of the board. Based on his prior service, Mr. Rigdon receives fixed retirement benefits from the company (including Pension Plan payments, benefits under the SERP, and life insurance benefits), with a total annual value of approximately $127,670.
The audit committee also reviews and investigates any matters pertaining to the integrity of management and directors, including conflicts of interest, or adherence to standards of business conduct required by this itemour policies.
DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE.
The standards relied upon by the board in affirmatively determining whether a director is incorporatedindependent are the objective standards set forth in the corporate governance listing standards of the NYSE. In making independence determinations, our board evaluates responses to a questionnaire completed annually by reference toeach director regarding relationships and possible conflicts of interest between each director, the company, and management. In its review of director independence, our 2021 Proxy Statement, which will be filedboard also considers any commercial, industrial, banking, consulting, legal, accounting, charitable, and familial relationships any director may have with the SECcompany or management of which it is aware.
Our board has affirmatively determined that six of our seven current directors – Messrs. Anderson, Fagerstal, Raspino, Rigdon, and Traub and Ms. Zabrocky are independent. Mr. Kneen is not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2020.

independent as he serves as our president and chief executive officer.

43

ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES

Information required

FEES AND RELATED DISCLOSURES FOR ACCOUNTING SERVICES
The following table lists the aggregate fees and costs billed by Deloitte & Touche LLP, the member firms of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, and their respective affiliates to our company for fiscal years 2019 and 2020.
  Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2020
  Fiscal Year Ended
December 31, 2019
 
Audit Fees(1)
 $1,321,528  $1,949,970 
Audit-Related Fees(2)
 $--  $207,263 
Tax Fees(3)
 $398,213  $1,371,643 
All Other Fees(4)
 $4,103  $4,103 
Total $1,723,844  $3,532,979 

(1)Relates to services rendered in connection with auditing our company’s consolidated financial statements for each annual or transition period and reviewing our company’s quarterly financial statements. Also includes services rendered in connection with statutory audits and financial statement audits of our subsidiaries.
(2)Consists of financial accounting and reporting consultations and employee benefit plan audits and fee related to registration statements and SEC comment letters.
(3)Consists of United States and foreign corporate tax compliance services and consultations.
(4)Consists of fees billed for all other professional services rendered to Tidewater, other than those reported in the previous three rows. These fees relate to an annual subscription to an online research resource.

The audit committee has determined that the provision of services described above is compatible with maintaining the independence of the independent auditors.
PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The audit committee’s policy is to pre-approve the scope of all audit services, audit-related services and other services permitted by law provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. Audit services and permitted non-audit services must be pre-approved by the full audit committee, except that the chairman of the audit committee has the authority to pre-approve any specific service if the total anticipated cost of such service is not expected to exceed $25,000, and provided the full audit committee ratifies the chairman’s approval at its next regular meeting. All fiscal 2019 and fiscal 2020 non-audit services were pre-approved by the audit committee.
44

PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
(a)(3)Exhibits
The following documents are included as exhibits to this item isForm 10-K/A. Those exhibits incorporated by reference to our 2021 Proxy Statement, which will be filed withare indicated as such in the SEC not later than 120 days subsequent to December 31, 2020.

parenthetical following the description.

PART IV

ITEM 15. EXHIBITS

(a)

2.1

The following documents are filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K:

(1) Financial Statements.

A list of the consolidated financial statements filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K is set forth in Part II, Item 8 beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K and is incorporated herein by reference.

(2) Financial Statement Schedules.

The financial statement schedule included in Part II, Item 8 of this document is filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K which begins on page F-1. All other schedules are omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is included in the consolidated financial statements or related notes.

(3) Exhibits.

The index below describes each exhibit filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Exhibits not incorporated by reference to a prior filing are designated by an asterisk; all exhibits not so designated are incorporated herein by reference to a prior filing as indicated.

 2.1

2.2

2.3

   

2.4

 

   

3.1

3.2

   
3.3 
   

4.1*

*
 

   

4.2

   

4.3

 

   
4.4 
   

4.5

45

10.1 

10.1

10.2

10.2
   

10.3

   

10.4

   

10.5

 

   

10.6

 

   

10.7

 

   

10.8

 

10.9+

10.10+

10.11+

   
10.12+ 

10.13+

46

10.14+ 

10.14+

10.15+ 
   

10.16+

10.17+

   

10.18+

10.19+

10.20+

 

10.20+
   

10.21+

 

   
10.22+ 
   

10.23+

 

   
10.24+ 
   
10.25+** 
   

10.26+

 

   
10.27+ 
47

10.28+ 

10.28+

   
10.29+ 
   

10.30+

 

   

10.31+

 

   

21*

*
 

   

23*

*

31.1*

32.1*

31.2*

32.1**

101.INS*

101.INS**Inline XBRL Instance Document. – The instance document does not appear in the interactive data file because its XBRL tags are embedded within the Inline XBRL document.

101.SCH*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema.

101.CAL*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.

101.LAB*

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.

   

101.PRE*

101.SCH**
 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.

Schema.
   

104

101.CAL**
 

Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase.

101.DEF**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase.
101.LAB**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase.
101.PRE**Inline XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase.
104Cover Page Interactive Data File (formatted as Inline XBRL and contained in Exhibit 101)

   
   

*  Filed herewith.

** Filed with the Original Form 10-K.
+ Indicates a management contract or compensatory plan or arrangement.

ITEM 16. FORM 10-K SUMMARY.

Not applicable.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 4,April 30, 2021.

 

TIDEWATER INC.

 

(Registrant)

    
 

By:

 

/s/ Quintin V. Kneen

   

Quintin V. Kneen

   

President, Chief Executive Officer and Director

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this Annual Report on Form 10-K has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities indicated on March 4, 2021.

/s/ Quintin V. Kneen

Quintin V. Kneen, President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer)

/s/ Samuel R. Rubio

Samuel R. Rubio, Vice President, Chief Accounting Officer and Controller (Principal Accounting Officer)

/s/ Larry T. Rigdon

Larry T. Rigdon, Chairman of the Board of Directors

/s/ Darron M. Anderson

Darron M. Anderson, Director

/s/ Dick H. Fagerstal

Dick H. Fagerstal, Director

/s/ Louis A. Raspino

Louis A. Raspino, Director

/s/ Kenneth H. Traub

Kenneth H. Traub, Director

/s/ Lois K. Zabrocky

Lois K. Zabrocky, Director

10149