SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K/A

(Amendment No. 1)

☒	ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2022

☐	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _______ to _______

ATLANTICUSHOLDINGS CORPORATION

a Georgia Corporation

IRS Employer Identification No.58-2336689

SEC File Number 0-53717

Five Concourse Parkway, Suite 300

Atlanta, Georgia 30328

(770)828-2000

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act"):

Title of Each Class	Trading Symbol(s)	Name of Each Exchange on Which Registered
Common stock, no par value per share	ATLC	NASDAQ Global Select Market
Series B Preferred Stock, no par value per share	ATLCP	NASDAQ Global Select Market
Senior Notes due 2026	ATLCL	NASDAQ Global Select Market

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes ☒ No ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer	☐	Accelerated filer	☒
Non-accelerated filer	☐	Smaller reporting company	☐
		Emerging Growth Company	☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has ﬁled a report on and attestation to its management’s assessment of the effectiveness of its internal control over ﬁnancial reporting under Section 404(b) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act (15 U.S.C. 7262(b)) by the registered public accounting ﬁrm that prepared or issued its audit report. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the financial statements of the registrant included in the filing reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether any of those error corrections are restatements that required a recovery analysis of incentive-based compensation received by any of the registrant’s executive officers during the relevant recovery period pursuant to §240.10D-1(b). ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b- 2). ☐ Yes ☒ No

The aggregate market value of Atlanticus’ common stock (based upon the closing sales price quoted on the NASDAQ Global Select Market) held by non-affiliates as of June 30, 2022, was $163.9 million. (For this purpose, directors, officers and 10% shareholders have been assumed to be affiliates.)

As of February 28, 2023, 14,449,712 shares of common stock, no par value, of Atlanticus were outstanding.

Portions of Atlanticus' Proxy Statement for its 2023 Annual Meeting of Shareholders filed on April 17, 2023 are incorporated by reference into Part III.

This Amendment No. 1 on Form 10-K/A (this “Amendment”) amends the original Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2022 filed by Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (the “Company”, “Atlanticus Holdings Corporation”, “Atlanticus”, “we”, “our”, “ours” and “us”) with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) on March 15, 2023 (the “Original Form 10-K”). This Amendment does not change our consolidated financial statements as set forth in the Original Form 10-K.

The purpose of this Amendment is to amend and restate (i) the Risk Factors disclosure included in Part I, Item 1A “Risk Factors” to describe risks related to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting that was identified subsequent to the filing of the Original Form 10-K; (ii) the “Report of Independent Registered Certified Public Accounting Firm” of BDO USA, P.C. (“BDO”) appearing in the Index to Financial Statements regarding the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting; and (iii) the disclosure on our internal control over financial reporting in Part II, Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” to reflect management’s conclusion that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective at December 31, 2022 due to a material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting identified subsequent to the filing of the Original Form 10-K. This material weakness did not result in any change to our consolidated financial statements as set forth in the Original Form 10-K. Part IV, Item 15, “Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules,” also has been amended and restated to include currently-dated certifications from the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer as required by Sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 (the “Sarbanes-Oxley Act”). The certifications are attached to this Amendment as Exhibits 31.1, 31.2 and 32.1.

Other than the changes as outlined above and the inclusion within this Amendment of new certifications by management and a new consent of our independent registered public accounting firm (and related amendment to the exhibit index that is incorporated by reference into Item 15 of the Original Form 10-K to reflect the addition of such certifications and consent and related changes to the footnotes to that exhibit index), this Amendment speaks only as of the date of the Original Form 10-K and does not modify or update any other disclosures contained in our Original Form 10-K for other events or information subsequent to the date of the filing of the Original Form 10-K. Specifically, there are no changes to our consolidated financial statements set forth in the Original Form 10-K. This Amendment should be read in conjunction with the Original Form 10-K and reports filed with the SEC subsequent to the Original Form 10-K.

An investment in our common stock, preferred stock or other securities involves a number of risks. You should carefully consider each of the risks described below before deciding to invest in our securities. If any of the following risks develops into actual events, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be negatively affected, the market prices of our securities could decline and you may lose all or part of your investment.

The impact of COVID-19 on global commercial activity and the corresponding volatility in financial markets is evolving. Initially, the global impact of the outbreak led to many federal, state and local governments instituting quarantines and restrictions on travel. More recently, there have been disruptions in global supply chains that have adversely impacted a number of industries, such as transportation, hospitality and entertainment. In addition, there have been significant inflation and labor shortages over the past year. The outbreak could have a continued adverse impact on economic and market conditions and trigger a period of global economic slowdown or recession. The rapid development and fluidity of this situation preclude any accurate prediction as to the ultimate impact of COVID-19. Nevertheless, COVID-19 presents material uncertainty and risk with respect to our performance and financial results. For additional information, see "—Other Risks to Our Business—COVID-19 has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. economy, and may have an adverse impact on our performance, results of operations and access to capital."

Our Cash Flows and Net Income Are Dependent Upon Payments from Our Investments in Receivables

The collectability of our investments in receivables is a function of many factors including the criteria used to select who is issued credit, the pricing of the credit products, the lengths of the relationships, general economic conditions, the rate at which consumers repay their accounts or become delinquent, and the rate at which consumers borrow funds. Deterioration in these factors would adversely impact our business. In addition, to the extent we have over-estimated collectability, in all likelihood we have over-estimated our financial performance. Some of these concerns are discussed more fully below.

Our portfolio of receivables is not diversified and primarily originates from consumers whose creditworthiness is considered less than prime. Historically, we have invested in receivables in one of two ways—we have either (i) invested in receivables originated by lenders who utilize our services or (ii) invested in or purchased pools of receivables from other issuers. In either case, substantially all of our receivables are from borrowers represented by credit risks that regulators classify as less than prime. Our reliance on these receivables may in the future negatively impact our performance.

Economic slowdowns increase our credit losses. During periods of economic slowdown or recession, we generally experience an increase in rates of delinquencies and frequency and severity of credit losses. Our actual rates of delinquencies and frequency and severity of credit losses may be comparatively higher during periods of economic slowdown or recession.

Because a significant portion of our reported income is based on management’s estimates of the future performance of receivables, differences between actual and expected performance of the receivables may cause fluctuations in net income. Significant portions of our reported income (or losses) are based on management’s estimates of cash flows we expect to receive on receivables, particularly for such assets that we report based on fair value. The expected cash flows are based on management’s estimates of interest rates, default rates, payment rates, cardholder purchases, servicing costs, and discount rates. These estimates are based on a variety of factors, many of which are not within our control. Substantial differences between actual and expected performance of the receivables will occur and cause fluctuations in our net income. For instance, higher than expected rates of delinquencies and losses could cause our net income to be lower than expected. Similarly, levels of loss and delinquency can result in our being required to repay lenders earlier than expected, thereby reducing funds available to us for future growth.

Due to our lack of significant experience with Internet consumers, we may not be able to evaluate their creditworthiness. Receivables owned by consumers and acquired over the internet present unique risk characteristics and exhibit higher rates of fraud. As a result, we may not be able to successfully evaluate the creditworthiness of these potential consumers. Therefore, we may encounter difficulties managing the expected delinquencies and losses.

We Are Substantially Dependent Upon Borrowed Funds to Fund Receivables We Purchase

We finance receivables that we acquire in large part through financing facilities. All of our financing facilities are of finite duration (and ultimately will need to be extended or replaced) and contain financial covenants and other conditions that must be fulfilled in order for funding to be available. Moreover, some of our facilities currently are in amortization stages (and are not allowing for the funding of any new loans) based on their original terms. The cost and availability of equity and borrowed funds is dependent upon our financial performance, the performance of our industry overall and general economic and market conditions, and at times equity and borrowed funds have been both expensive and difficult to obtain.

If additional financing facilities are not available in the future on terms we consider acceptable, we will not be able to purchase additional receivables and those receivables may contract in size.

Capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability, potentially limiting our ability to grow our receivables. From time-to-time, capital markets may experience periods of disruption and instability. For example, from 2008 to 2009, the global capital markets were unstable as evidenced by the lack of liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of major financial institutions. These events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. If similar adverse and volatile market conditions repeat in the future, we and other companies in the financial services sector may have to access, if available, alternative markets for debt and equity capital in order to grow our receivables.

Moreover, the re-appearance of market conditions similar to those experienced from 2008 through 2009 for any substantial length of time or worsened market conditions could make it difficult for us to borrow money or to extend the maturity of or refinance any indebtedness we may have under similar terms and any failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business. Unfavorable economic and political conditions, including future recessions, political instability, geopolitical turmoil and foreign hostilities, energy disruptions, inflation and disease, pandemics and other serious health events, also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us.

COVID-19 continues to adversely impact global commercial activity and has contributed to significant volatility in financial markets. The pandemic has, in part, caused disruptions in global supply chains that have adversely impacted a number of industries, such as transportation, hospitality and entertainment. In addition, there have been significant inflation and labor shortages over the past year. The outbreak could have a continued adverse impact on economic and market conditions and trigger a period of global economic slowdown. The rapid development and fluidity of this situation preclude any accurate prediction as to the ultimate adverse impact of the coronavirus response. Nevertheless, the pandemic presents material uncertainty and risk with respect to our performance and financial results.

We may in the future have difficulty accessing debt and equity capital on attractive terms, or at all, and a severe disruption and instability in the global financial markets or deteriorations in credit and financing conditions may cause us to reduce the volume of receivables we purchase or otherwise have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our Financial Performance Is, in Part, a Function of the Aggregate Amount of Receivables That Are Outstanding

The aggregate amount of outstanding receivables is a function of many factors including purchase rates, payment rates, interest rates, seasonality, general economic conditions, competition from credit card issuers and other sources of consumer financing, access to funding, and the timing and extent of our receivable purchases.

The recent growth of our investments in private label credit and general purpose credit card receivables may not be indicative of our ability to grow such receivables in the future. Our period-end managed receivables balance for private label credit and general purpose credit card receivables grew to $2,119.3 million at December 31, 2022, from $1,609.8 million at December 31, 2021. The amount of such receivables has fluctuated significantly over the course of our operating history. Furthermore, even if such receivables continue to increase, the rate of such growth could decline. If we cannot manage the growth in receivables effectively, it could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Reliance upon relationships with a few large retailers in the private label credit operations may adversely affect our revenues and operating results from these operations. Our five largest retail partners accounted for over 65% of our outstanding private label credit receivables as of December 31, 2022. Although we are adding new retail partners on a regular basis, it is likely that we will continue to derive a significant portion of this operations’ receivables base and corresponding revenue from a relatively small number of partners in the future. If a significant partner reduces or terminates its relationship with us, these operations’ revenue could decline significantly and our operating results and financial condition could be harmed.

Changes in bankruptcy, privacy or other consumer protection laws, or to the prevailing interpretation thereof, may expose us to litigation, adversely affect our ability to collect receivables, or otherwise adversely affect our operations. Similarly, regulatory changes could adversely affect the ability or willingness of lenders who utilize our technology platform and related services to market credit products and services to consumers. Also, the accounting rules that apply to our business are exceedingly complex, difficult to apply and in a state of flux. As a result, how we value our receivables and otherwise account for our business is subject to change depending upon the changes in, and interpretation of, those rules. Some of these issues are discussed more fully below.

Reviews and enforcement actions by regulatory authorities under banking and consumer protection laws and regulations may result in changes to our business practices, may make collection of receivables more difficult or may expose us to the risk of fines, restitution and litigation. Our operations and the operations of the issuing banks through which the credit products we service are originated are subject to the jurisdiction of federal, state and local government authorities, including the SEC, the FDIC, the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, the FTC, U.K. banking and licensing authorities, state regulators having jurisdiction over financial institutions and debt origination and collection and state attorneys general. Our business practices and the practices of issuing banks, including the terms of products, servicing and collection practices, are subject to both periodic and special reviews by these regulatory and enforcement authorities. These reviews can range from investigations of specific consumer complaints or concerns to broader inquiries. If as part of these reviews the regulatory authorities conclude that we or issuing banks are not complying with applicable law, they could request or impose a wide range of remedies including requiring changes in advertising and collection practices, changes in the terms of products (such as decreases in interest rates or fees), the imposition of fines or penalties, or the paying of restitution or the taking of other remedial action with respect to affected consumers. They also could require us or issuing banks to stop offering some credit products or obtain licenses to do so, either nationally or in select states. To the extent that these remedies are imposed on the issuing banks that originate credit products using our platform, under certain circumstances we are responsible for the remedies as a result of our indemnification obligations with those banks. We or our issuing banks also may elect to change practices that we believe are compliant with law in order to respond to regulatory concerns. Furthermore, negative publicity relating to any specific inquiry or investigation could hurt our ability to conduct business with various industry participants or to generate new receivables and could negatively affect our stock price, which would adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital and would raise our costs of doing business.

If any deficiencies or violations of law or regulations are identified by us or asserted by any regulator or require us or issuing banks to change any practices, the correction of such deficiencies or violations, or the making of such changes, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or business. In addition, whether or not these practices are modified when a regulatory or enforcement authority requests or requires, there is a risk that we or other industry participants may be named as defendants in litigation involving alleged violations of federal and state laws and regulations, including consumer protection laws. Any failure to comply with legal requirements by us or the banks that originate credit products utilizing our platform in connection with the issuance of those products, or by us or our agents as the servicer of our accounts, could significantly impair our ability to collect the full amount of the account balances. The institution of any litigation of this nature, or any judgment against us or any other industry participant in any litigation of this nature, could adversely affect our business and financial condition in a variety of ways.

The regulatory landscape in which we operate is continually changing due to new rules, regulations and interpretations, as well as various legal actions that have been brought against others that have sought to re-characterize certain loans made by federally insured banks as loans made by third parties. If litigation on similar theories were brought against us when we work with a federally insured bank that makes loans and were such an action successful, we could be subject to state usury limits and/or state licensing requirements, loans in such states could be deemed void and unenforceable, and we could be subject to substantial penalties in connection with such loans. The case law involving whether an originating lender, on the one hand, or a third party, on the other hand, is the “true lender” of a loan is still developing and courts have come to different conclusions and applied different analyses. The determination of whether a third-party service provider is the “true lender” is significant because third parties risk having the loans they service becoming subject to a consumer’s state usury limits. A number of federal courts that have opined on the “true lender” issue have looked to who is the lender identified on the borrower’s loan documents. A number of state courts and at least one federal district court have considered a number of other factors when analyzing whether the originating lender or a third party is the “true lender,” including looking at the economics of the transaction to determine, among other things, who has the predominant economic interest in the loan being made. If we were re-characterized as a “true lender” with respect to the receivables originated by the bank that utilizes our technology platform and other services, such receivables could be deemed to be void and unenforceable in some states, the right to collect finance charges could be affected, and we could be subject to fines and penalties from state and federal regulatory agencies as well as claims by borrowers, including class actions by private plaintiffs. Even if we were not required to change our business practices to comply with applicable state laws and regulations or cease doing business in some states, we could be required to register or obtain lending licenses or other regulatory approvals that could impose a substantial cost on us. If the bank that originates loans utilizing our technology platform were subject to such a lawsuit, it may elect to terminate its relationship with us voluntarily or at the direction of its regulators, and if it lost the lawsuit, it could be forced to modify or terminate such relationship.

In addition to true lender challenges, a question regarding the applicability of state usury rates may arise when a loan is sold from a bank to a non-bank entity. In Madden v. Midland Funding, LLC, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit held that the federal preemption of state usury laws did not extend to the purchaser of a loan issued by a national bank. In its brief urging the U.S. Supreme Court to deny certiorari, the U.S. Solicitor General, joined by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (“OCC”), noted that the Second Circuit (Connecticut, New York and Vermont) analysis was incorrect. On remand, the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York concluded on February 27, 2017, that New York’s state usury law, not Delaware’s state usury law, was applicable and that the plaintiff’s claims under the FDCPA and state unfair and deceptive acts and practices could proceed. To that end, the court granted Madden’s motion for class certification. At this time, it is unknown whether Madden will be applied outside of the defaulted debt context in which it arose. The facts in Madden are not directly applicable to our business, as we do not engage in practices similar to those at issue in Madden. However, to the extent that the holding in Madden is broadened to cover circumstances applicable to our business, or if other litigation on related theories were brought against us or others and were successful, or we otherwise were found to be the “true lender,” we could become subject to state usury limits and state licensing laws, in addition to the state consumer protection laws to which we are already subject, in a greater number of states, loans in such states could be deemed void and unenforceable, and we could be subject to substantial penalties in connection with such loans.

In response to the uncertainty Madden created as to the validity of interest rates of bank-originated loans sold in the secondary market, in May 2020 and June 2020, the OCC and the FDIC, respectively, issued final rules that reaffirmed the “valid when made” doctrine and clarified that when a bank sells, assigns, or otherwise transfers a loan, the interest rates permissible prior to the transfer continue to be permissible following the transfer. In the summer of 2020, a number of state attorneys general filed suits against the OCC and the FDIC, challenging these "valid when made" rules. In February 2022, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California entered two orders granting summary judgement in favor of the OCC and the FDIC. The court held that the bank regulators had the power to issue the rules reaffirming the "valid when made" doctrine. Although the practical consequences of Madden have diminished since the initial ruling, uncertainty remains in this area of law.

The bank that we support in connection with its extension of loans and one of our subsidiaries currently are involved in a dispute with the Maryland Commissioner of Financial Regulation with respect to the extent to which federal preemption preempts state regulation of bank activities related to the lending process, such as lender licensing requirements and aspects of those licensing requirements that purport to limit the rate of interest that can be charged. The Commissioner issued a "charge letter" making various assertions regarding the applicability of the licensing requirements and interest rate limitations, with the case to be heard in the Maryland Office of Administrative Hearings where the case is currently pending. The ultimate remedy sought by the Commissioner is the invalidation of loans to Maryland residents. We believe that preemption should apply and that the licensing requirements should not apply to the bank in its making loans in Maryland, but the ultimate outcome could be unfavorable. In light of the amount of loans involved, we do not believe that an adverse outcome would be material, but it could result in further erosion of federal preemption and our ability to operate as we currently do in Maryland and other states.

We support a single bank that markets general purpose credit cards and certain other credit products directly to consumers. We acquire interests in and service the receivables originated by that bank. The bank could determine not to continue the relationship for various business reasons, or its regulators could limit its ability to issue credit cards utilizing our technology platform or to originate some or all of the other products that we service or require the bank to modify those products significantly and could do either with little or no notice. Any significant interruption or change of our bank relationship would result in our being unable to acquire new receivables or develop certain other credit products. Unless we were able to timely replace our bank relationship, such an interruption would prevent us from acquiring newly-originated credit card receivables and growing our investments in private label credit and general purpose credit card receivables. In turn, it would materially adversely impact our business.

TheFDIC has issued examination guidance affecting the bank that utilizes our technology platform to market general purpose credit cards and certain other credit products and these or subsequent new rules and regulations could have a significant impact on such credit products. The bank that utilizes our technology platform and other services to market general purpose credit cards and certain other credit products is supervised and examined by both the state that charters it and the FDIC. If the FDIC or a state supervisory body considers any aspect of the products originated utilizing our technology platform to be inconsistent with its guidance, the bank may be required to alter or terminate some or all of these products.

In July 2016, the board of directors of the FDIC released examination guidance relating to third-party lending as part of a package of materials designed to “improve the transparency and clarity of the FDIC’s supervisory policies and practices” and consumer compliance measures that FDIC-supervised institutions should follow when lending through a business relationship with a third party. The proposed guidance, if finalized, would apply to all FDIC-supervised institutions that engage in third-party lending programs, including the bank that utilizes our technology platform and other services to market general purpose credit cards and certain other credit products.

The proposed guidance elaborates on previously-issued agency guidance on managing third-party risks and specifically addresses third-party lending arrangements where an FDIC-supervised institution relies on a third party to perform a significant aspect of the lending process. The types of relationships that would be covered by the guidance include (but are not limited to) relationships for originating loans on behalf of, through or jointly with third parties, or using platforms developed by third parties. If adopted as proposed, the guidance would result in increased supervisory attention of institutions that engage in significant lending activities through third parties, including at least one examination every 12 months, as well as supervisory expectations for a third-party lending risk management program and third-party lending policies that contain certain minimum requirements, such as self-imposed limits as a percentage of total capital for each third-party lending relationship and for the overall loan program, relative to origination volumes, credit exposures (including pipeline risk), growth, loan types, and acceptable credit quality. While the guidance has never formally been adopted, it is our understanding that the FDIC has relied upon it in its examination of third-party
lending arrangements.

On July 20, 2020, the FDIC announced that it is seeking the public's input on the potential for a public/private standard-setting partnership and voluntary certification program to promote the effective adoption of innovative technologies at FDIC-supervised financial institutions. Released as part of the FDiTech initiative, the request asks whether the proposed program might reduce the regulatory and operational uncertainty that may prevent financial institutions from deploying new technology or entering into partnerships with technology firms, including "fintechs." For financial institutions that choose to use the system, a voluntary certification program could help standardize due diligence practices and reduce associated costs. At this time, it is unclear what impact this request and potential proposal will have on our operations.

On July 13, 2021, the Federal Reserve, Office of the Comptroller of the Currency, and the FDIC issued proposed guidance on managing risks associated with third-party relationships, including relationships with fintech entities and bank/fintech sponsorship arrangements. The guidance sets forth expectations for managing risk throughout the life cycle of such arrangements, including planning, due diligence and contract negotiation, oversight and accountability, ongoing monitoring, and termination. We will continue to monitor this guidance as it potentially becomes final.

Changes to consumer protection laws or changes in their interpretation may impede collection efforts or otherwise adversely impact our business practices. Federal and state consumer protection laws regulate the creation and enforcement of consumer credit card receivables and other loans. Many of these laws (and the related regulations) are focused on non-prime lenders and are intended to prohibit or curtail industry-standard practices as well as non-standard practices. For instance, Congress enacted legislation that regulates loans to military personnel through imposing interest rate and other limitations and requiring new disclosures, all as regulated by the Department of Defense. Similarly, in 2009 Congress enacted legislation that required changes to a variety of marketing, billing and collection practices, and the Federal Reserve adopted significant changes to a number of practices through its issuance of regulations. While our practices are in compliance with these changes, some of the changes (e.g., limitations on the ability to assess up-front fees) have significantly affected the viability of certain credit products within the U.S. Changes in the consumer protection laws could result in the following:

Material regulatory developments may adversely impact our business and results from operations.

Our Automobile Lending Activities Involve Risks in Addition to Others Described Herein

Automobile lending exposes us not only to most of the risks described above but also to additional risks, including the regulatory scheme that governs installment loans and those attendant to relying upon automobiles and their repossession and liquidation value as collateral. In addition, our Auto Finance segment operation acquires loans on a wholesale basis from used car dealers, for which we rely upon the legal compliance and credit determinations by those dealers.

Funding for automobile lending may become difficult to obtain and expensive. In the event we are unable to renew or replace any Auto Finance segment credit facilities that bear refunding or refinancing risks when they become due, our Auto Finance segment could experience significant constraints and diminution in reported asset values as lenders retain significant cash flows within underlying structured financings or otherwise under security arrangements for repayment of their loans. If we cannot renew or replace future facilities or otherwise are unduly constrained from a liquidity perspective, we may choose to sell part or all of our auto loan portfolios, possibly at less than favorable prices.

Our automobile lending business is dependent upon referrals from dealers. Currently we provide substantially all of our automobile loans only to or through used car dealers. Providers of automobile financing have traditionally competed based on the interest rate charged, the quality of credit accepted and the flexibility of loan terms offered. In order to be successful, we not only need to be competitive in these areas, but also need to establish and maintain good relations with dealers and provide them with a level of service greater than what they can obtain from our competitors.

The financial performance of our automobile loan portfolio is in part dependent upon the liquidation of repossessed automobiles. In the event of certain defaults, we may repossess automobiles and sell repossessed automobiles at wholesale auction markets located throughout the U.S. Auction proceeds from these types of sales and other recoveries generally are not sufficient to cover the outstanding balances of the contracts; where we experience these shortfalls, we will experience credit losses.

Repossession of automobiles entails the risk of litigation and other claims. Although we have contracted with reputable repossession firms to repossess automobiles on defaulted loans, it is not uncommon for consumers to assert that we were not entitled to repossess an automobile or that the repossession was not conducted in accordance with applicable law. These claims increase the cost of our collection efforts and, if successful, can result in awards against us.

We Routinely Explore Various Opportunities to Grow Our Business, to Make Investments and to Purchase and Sell Assets

We routinely consider acquisitions of, or investments in, portfolios and other assets as well as the sale of portfolios and portions of our business. There are a number of risks attendant to any acquisition, including the possibility that we will overvalue the assets to be purchased and that we will not be able to produce the expected level of profitability from the acquired business or assets. Similarly, there are a number of risks attendant to sales, including the possibility that we will undervalue the assets to be sold. As a result, the impact of any acquisition or sale on our future performance may not be as favorable as expected and actually may be adverse.

Portfolio purchases may cause fluctuations in our reported CaaS segment’s managed receivables data, possibly reducing the usefulness of this data in evaluating our business. Our reported CaaS segment managed receivables data may fluctuate substantially from quarter to quarter as a result of recent and future credit card portfolio acquisitions.

Receivables included in purchased portfolios are likely to have been originated using credit criteria different from the criteria of issuing bank partners that have originated accounts utilizing our technology platform. Receivables included in any particular purchased portfolio may have significantly different delinquency rates and charge-off rates than the receivables previously originated and purchased by us. These receivables also may earn different interest rates and fees as compared to other similar receivables in our receivables portfolio. These variables could cause our reported managed receivables data to fluctuate substantially in future periods making the evaluation of our business more difficult.

Any acquisition or investment that we make will involve risks different from and in addition to the risks to which our business is currently exposed. These include the risks that we will not be able to integrate and operate successfully new businesses, that we will have to incur substantial indebtedness and increase our leverage in order to pay for the acquisitions, that we will be exposed to, and have to comply with, different regulatory regimes and that we will not be able to apply our traditional analytical framework (which is what we expect to be able to do) in a successful and value-enhancing manner.

We are remediatinga material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting. If we experience additional material weaknesses in the future, our business may be harmed. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting and for evaluating and reporting on the effectiveness of our system of internal control. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”). As a public company, we are required to comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and other rules that govern public companies. In particular, we are required to certify our compliance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, which requires us to furnish annually a report by management on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting.

Management reassessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 and concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of December 31, 2022 due to a material weakness described under Part II, Item 9A “Controls and Procedures” in this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A.

Remediation efforts place a significant burden on management and add increased pressure on our financial resources and processes. If we identify material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting in the future, our business may be harmed. Such harm may include: (i) failure to accurately report our financial results, to prevent fraud or to meet our SEC reporting obligations in a timely basis or at all; (ii) material misstatements in our consolidated financial statements and harm to our operating results and investor confidence; and (iii) a material adverse effect on the trading prices of our securities. In addition, the foregoing could subject us to sanctions or investigations by the NASDAQ, the SEC or other regulatory authorities, and result in the breach of covenants in our debt agreements, any of which could have a material adverse impact on our operations, financial condition, results of operations, liquidity and our securities’ trading prices.

Further, there are inherent limitations in the effectiveness of any control system, including the potential for human error and the possible circumvention or overriding of controls and procedures. Additionally, judgments in decision-making can be faulty and breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. An effective control system can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the control objectives of the system are adequately met. Finally, projections of any evaluation or assessment of effectiveness of a control system to future periods are subject to the risks that, over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in an entity’s operating environment or deterioration in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.

COVID-19has caused severe disruptions in the U.S. economy and may have an adverse impact on our performance, results of operations and access to capital. In March 2020, a national emergency was declared under the National Emergencies Act due to a new strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19"). Measures initially taken across the U.S. and worldwide to mitigate the spread of the virus significantly impacted the macroeconomic environment, including consumer confidence, unemployment and other economic indicators that contribute to consumer spending behavior and demand for credit. More recently, policy responses to the COVID-19 pandemic have, in part, caused, supply chain disruptions, significant inflation and labor shortages. Our results of operations are impacted by the relative strength of the overall economy. As general economic conditions improve or deteriorate, the amount of consumer disposable income tends to fluctuate, which, in turn, impacts consumer spending levels and the willingness of consumers to finance purchases. Furthermore, to the extent that supply chain disruptions result in deferred purchases, there will be a corresponding decrease in our receivable purchases.

We routinely engage in discussions with customers, some of whom have indicated that they have experienced economic hardship due to the COVID-19 pandemic and have requested payment deferral or forbearance or other modifications of their accounts. While we are addressing requests for relief, we may still experience higher instances of default. Additionally, the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our liquidity position and could limit our ability to grow our business or fully execute on our business strategy. Furthermore, the COVID-19 pandemic and resulting economic conditions could negatively impact our access to capital.

The COVID-19 pandemic also resulted in us modifying certain business practices, such as transitioning to a distributed work model. We may take further actions as required by government authorities or as we determine to be in the best interests of our employees and consumers. We may experience disruptions due to a number of operational factors, including, but not limited to:

Even as the COVID-19 pandemic subsides, our business may continue to be unfavorably impacted by the economic turmoil caused by the pandemic. There are no recent comparable events that could serve to indicate the ultimate effect the COVID-19 pandemic may have and, as such, we do not at this time know what the extent of the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic will be on our business. To the extent the COVID-19 pandemic adversely affects our business and financial results, it also may heighten other risks described in this Part I, Item 1A.

For additional discussion of the impact of COVID-19 on our business, see additional risk factors included in this Part I, Item 1A, as well as Part II, Item 7 “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Our business and operations may be negatively affected by rising prices and interest rates. Our financial performance and consumers’ ability to repay indebtedness may be affected by uncertain economic conditions, including inflation and changing interest rates. Higher inflation increases the costs of goods and services, reduces consumer spending power and may negatively affect our ability to purchase receivables. In 2022, inflation reached a four-decade high.

The Federal Reserve has raised, and has indicated that it expects to continue to raise, interest rates to combat inflation. Increased interest rates may adversely impact the spending levels of consumers and their ability and willingness to borrow money. Higher interest rates often lead to higher payment obligations, which may reduce the ability of consumers to remain current on their obligations and, therefore, lead to increased delinquencies, defaults, customer bankruptcies and charge-offs, and decreased recoveries, all of which could have an adverse effect on our business.

Recently, prices for energy and food have been particularly volatile in light of Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and the resulting trade restrictions and sanctions imposed on Russia by the U.S. and other countries. These recent events have increased inflationary pressures.

We are a holding company with no operations of our own. As a result, our cash flow and ability to service our debt is dependent upon distributions from our subsidiaries. The distribution of subsidiary earnings, or advances or other distributions of funds by subsidiaries to us, all of which are subject to statutory and could be subject to contractual restrictions, are contingent upon the subsidiaries’ cash flows and earnings and are subject to various business and debt covenant considerations.

We are party to litigation. We are party to certain legal proceedings which include litigation customary for a business of our nature. In each case we believe that we have meritorious defenses or that the positions we are asserting otherwise are correct. However, adverse outcomes are possible in these matters, and we could decide to settle one or more of our litigation matters in order to avoid the ongoing cost of litigation or to obtain certainty of outcome. Adverse outcomes or settlements of these matters could require us to pay damages, make restitution, change our business practices or take other actions at a level, or in a manner, that would adversely impact our business.

The failure of financial institutions or transactional counterparties could adversely affect our current and projected business operations and our financial condition and results of operations. On March 10, 2023, Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB, was closed by the California Department of Financial Protection and Innovation, which appointed the FDIC as receiver. Similarly, on March 12, 2023, Signature Bank and Silvergate Capital Corp. were each swept into receivership. A statement by the Department of the Treasury, the Federal Reserve and the FDIC stated that all depositors of SVB would have access to all of their money after only one business day of closure, including funds held in uninsured deposit accounts. Although we do not have any funds deposited with SVB and Signature Bank, we regularly maintain cash balances with other financial institutions in excess of the FDIC insurance limit. A failure of a depository institution to return deposits could impact access to our invested cash or cash equivalents and could adversely impact our operating liquidity and financial performance.

Because we outsource account-processing functions that are integral to our business, any disruption or termination of these outsourcing relationships could harm our business. We generally outsource account and payment processing. If these outsourcing relationships were not renewed or were terminated or the services provided to us were otherwise disrupted, we would have to obtain these services from alternate providers. There is a risk that we would not be able to enter into similar outsourcing arrangements with alternate providers on terms that we consider favorable or in a timely manner without disruption of our business.

Failureto keep up with the rapid technological changes in financial services and e-commerce could harm our business. The financial services industry is undergoing rapid technological changes, with frequent introductions of new technology-driven products and services. The effective use of technology increases efficiency and enables financial and lending institutions to better serve customers and reduce costs. Our future success will depend, in part, upon our ability to address the needs of consumers by using technology to support products and services that will satisfy consumer demands for convenience, as well as to create additional efficiencies in our operations. We may not be able to effectively implement new technology-driven products and services as quickly as some of our competitors. Failure to successfully keep pace with technological change affecting the financial services industry could harm our ability to compete with our competitors. Any such failure to adapt to changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Ifwe are unable to protect our information systems against service interruption, our operations could be disrupted and our reputation may be damaged. We rely heavily on networks and information systems and other technology, that are largely hosted by third parties to support our business processes and activities, including processes integral to the origination and collection of loans and other financial products, and information systems to process financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory, financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. Because information systems are critical to many of our operating activities, our business may be impacted by hosted system shutdowns, service disruptions or security breaches. These incidents may be caused by failures during routine operations such as system upgrades or user errors, as well as network or hardware failures, malicious or disruptive software, computer hackers, rogue employees or contractors, cyber-attacks by criminal groups, geopolitical events, natural disasters, pandemics, failures or impairments of telecommunications networks, or other catastrophic events. If our information systems suffer severe damage, disruption or shutdown and our business continuity plans do not effectively resolve the issues in a timely manner, we could experience delays in reporting our financial results, and we may lose revenue and profits as a result of our inability to collect payments in a timely manner. We also could be required to spend significant financial and other resources to repair or replace networks and information systems.

Unauthorized or unintentional disclosure of sensitive or confidential customer data could expose us to protracted and costly litigation, and civil and criminal penalties. To conduct our business, we are required to manage, use, and store large amounts of personally identifiable information, consisting primarily of confidential personal and financial data regarding consumers across all operations areas. We also depend on our IT networks and systems, and those of third parties, to process, store, and transmit this information. As a result, we are subject to numerous U.S. federal and state laws designed to protect this information. Security breaches involving our files and infrastructure could lead to unauthorized disclosure of confidential information.

We take a number of measures to ensure the security of our hardware and software systems and customer information. Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries in the field of cryptography or other developments may result in the technology used by us to protect data being breached or compromised. In the past, banks and other financial service providers have been the subject of sophisticated and highly targeted attacks on their information technology. An increasing number of websites have reported breaches of their security.

If any person, including our employees or those of third-party vendors, negligently disregards or intentionally breaches our established controls with respect to such data or otherwise mismanages or misappropriates that data, we could be subject to costly litigation, monetary damages, fines, and/or criminal prosecution. Any unauthorized disclosure of personally identifiable information could subject us to liability under data privacy laws. Further, under credit card rules and our contracts with our card processors, if there is a breach of credit card information that we store, we could be liable to the credit card issuing banks for their cost of issuing new cards and related expenses. In addition, if we fail to follow credit card industry security standards, even if there is no compromise of customer information, we could incur significant fines. Security breaches also could harm our reputation, which could potentially cause decreased revenues, the loss of existing merchant credit partners, or difficulty in adding new merchant credit partners.

Internet and data security breaches also could impede our bank partners from originating loans over the Internet, cause us to lose consumers or otherwise damage our reputation or business. Consumers generally are concerned with security and privacy, particularly on the Internet. As part of our growth strategy, we have enabled lenders to originate loans over the Internet. The secure transmission of confidential information over the Internet is essential to maintaining customer confidence in such products and services offered online.

Advances in computer capabilities, new discoveries or other developments could result in a compromise or breach of the technology used by us to protect our client or consumer application and transaction data transmitted over the Internet. In addition to the potential for litigation and civil penalties described above, security breaches could damage our reputation and cause consumers to become unwilling to do business with our clients or us, particularly over the Internet. Any publicized security problems could inhibit the growth of the Internet as a means of conducting commercial transactions. Our ability to service our clients’ needs over the Internet would be severely impeded if consumers become unwilling to transmit confidential information online.

Also, a party that is able to circumvent our security measures could misappropriate proprietary information, cause interruption in our operations, damage our computers or those of our users, or otherwise damage our reputation and business.

Regulationin the areas of privacy and data security could increase our costs. We are subject to various regulations related to privacy and data security/breach, and we could be negatively impacted by these regulations. For example, we are subject to the Safeguards guidelines under the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. The Safeguards guidelines require that each financial institution develop, implement and maintain a written, comprehensive information security program containing safeguards that are appropriate to the financial institution’s size and complexity, the nature and scope of the financial institution’s activities and the sensitivity of any customer information at issue. Broad-ranging data security laws that affect our business also have been adopted by several states.

The California Consumer Privacy Act (the “CCPA”) became effective on January 1, 2020. The CCPA requires, among other things, covered companies to provide new disclosures to California consumers and afford such consumers with expanded protections and control over the collection, maintenance, use and sharing of personal information. The CCPA continues to be subject to new regulations and legislative amendments. Although we have implemented a compliance program designed to address obligations under the CCPA, it remains unclear what future modifications will be made or how the CCPA will be interpreted in the future. The CCPA provides for civil penalties for violations and a private right of action for data breaches.

In addition, in November 2020, California voters approved the California Privacy Rights Act of 2020 (the “CPRA”) ballot initiative, which became effective on January 1, 2023. The CPRA established the California Privacy Protection Agency to implement and enforce the CCPA and CPRA. We anticipate that the CPRA and certain regulations promulgated by the California Privacy Protection Agency will apply to our business and we will work to ensure compliance with such laws and regulations by their effective dates.

Compliance with these laws regarding the protection of consumer and employee data could result in higher compliance and technology costs for us, as well as potentially significant fines and penalties for noncompliance. Further, there are various other statutes and regulations relevant to the direct email marketing, debt collection and text-messaging industries including the Telephone Consumer Protection Act. The interpretation of many of these statutes and regulations is evolving in the courts and administrative agencies and an inability to comply with them may have an adverse impact on our business.

In addition to the foregoing enhanced data security requirements, various federal banking regulatory agencies, and all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico and the Virgin Islands, have enacted data security regulations and laws requiring varying levels of consumer notification in the event of a security breach. Also, federal legislators and regulators are increasingly pursuing new guidelines, laws and regulations that, if adopted, could further restrict how we collect, use, share and secure consumer information, possibly impacting some of our current or planned business initiatives.

Unplanned system interruptions or system failures could harm our business and reputation. Any interruption in the availability of our transactional processing services due to hardware, operating system failures, or system conversion will reduce our revenues and profits. Any unscheduled interruption in our services results in an immediate, and possibly substantial, reduction in our ability to serve our customers, thereby resulting in a loss of revenues. Frequent or persistent interruptions in our services could cause current or potential consumers to believe that our systems are unreliable, leading them to switch to our competitors or to avoid our websites or services, and could permanently harm our reputation.

Although our systems have been designed around industry-standard architectures to reduce downtime in the event of outages or catastrophic occurrences, they remain vulnerable to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power loss, telecommunication failures, computer viruses, computer denial-of-service attacks, and similar events or disruptions. Some of our systems are not fully redundant, and our disaster recovery planning may not be sufficient for all eventualities. Our systems also are subject to break-ins, sabotage, and intentional acts of vandalism. Despite any precautions we may take, the occurrence of a natural disaster, pandemic, a decision by any of our third-party hosting providers to close a facility we use without adequate notice for financial or other reasons or other unanticipated problems at our hosting facilities could cause system interruptions, delays, and loss of critical data, and result in lengthy interruptions in our services. Our business interruption insurance may not be sufficient to compensate us for losses that may result from interruptions in our service as a result of system failures.

Climate change and related regulatory responses may impact our business. Climate change as a result of emissions of greenhouse gases is a significant topic of discussion and has generated and may continue to generate federal and other regulatory responses. We are uncertain of the ultimate impact, either directionally or quantitatively, of climate change and related regulatory responses on our business. The most direct impact is likely to be an increase in energy costs, adversely impacting consumers and their ability to incur and repay indebtedness.

Weelected the fair value option for newly originated assets, effective as of January 1, 2020, and we use estimates in determining the fair value of our loans. If our estimates prove incorrect, we may be required to write down the value of these assets, adversely affecting our results of operations. Our ability to measure and report our financial position and results of operations is influenced by the need to estimate the impact or outcome of future events on the basis of information available at the time of the issuance of the financial statements. Further, most of these estimates are determined using Level 3 inputs for which changes could significantly impact our fair value measurements. A variety of factors including, but not limited to, estimated yields on consumer receivables, customer default rates, the timing of expected payments, estimated costs to service the portfolio, interest rates, and valuations of comparable portfolios may ultimately affect the fair values of our loans and finance receivables. If actual results differ from our judgments and assumptions, then it may have an adverse impact on the results of operations and cash flows. Management has processes in place to monitor these judgments and assumptions, but these processes may not ensure that our judgments and assumptions are accurate.

Our allowance for uncollectible loans is determined based upon both objective and subjective factors and may not be adequate to absorb credit losses. We face the risk that customers will fail to repay their loans in full. Through our analysis of loan performance, delinquency data, charge-off data, economic trends and the potential effects of those economic trends on consumers, we establish an allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable as an estimate of the probable losses inherent within those loans, interest and fees receivable that we do not report at fair value. We determine the necessary allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable by analyzing some or all of the following unique to each type of receivable pool: historical loss rates; current delinquency and roll-rate trends; vintage analyses based on the number of months an account has been in existence; the effects of changes in the economy on consumers; changes in underwriting criteria; and estimated recoveries. These inputs are considered in conjunction with (and potentially reduced by) any unearned fees and discounts that may be applicable for an outstanding loan receivable. Actual losses are difficult to forecast, especially if such losses are due to factors beyond our historical experience
or control. As a result, our allowance for uncollectible loans may not be adequate to absorb incurred losses or prevent a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Losses are the largest cost as a percentage of revenues across all of our products. Fraud and customers not being able to repay their loans are both significant drivers of loss rates. If we experienced rising credit or fraud losses this would significantly reduce our earnings and profit margins and could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

Theprices of our securities may fluctuate significantly, and this may make it difficult for you to resell our securities when you want or at prices you find attractive. The prices of our securities on the NASDAQ Global Select Market constantly change. We expect that the market prices of our securities will continue to fluctuate. The market prices of our securities may fluctuate in response to numerous factors, many of which are beyond our control. These factors include the following:

In addition, the stock markets from time to time experience extreme price and volume fluctuations that may be unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of companies. These broad fluctuations may adversely affect the trading prices of our securities, regardless of our actual operating performance.

Future sales of our common stock or equity-related securities in the public market could adversely affect the trading price of our common stock and our ability to raise funds in new stock offerings. Sales of significant amounts of our common stock or equity-related securities in the public market or the perception that such sales will occur, could adversely affect prevailing trading prices of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through future offerings of equity or equity-related securities. Future sales of shares of common stock or the availability of shares of common stock for future sale, including sales of our common stock in short sale transactions, may have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock.

Theshares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock are senior obligations, rank prior to our common stock with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation and have other terms, such as a redemption right, that could negatively impact the value of shares of our common stock. In December 2019, we issued 400,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock. The rights of the holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation rank senior to similar obligations to our holders of common stock. Holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on each share of such stock equal to 6% per annum on the liquidation preference of $100. The dividends on the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock are cumulative and non-compounding and must be paid before we pay any dividends on the common stock.

Further, on and after January 1, 2024, the holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock will have the right to require us to purchase outstanding shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock for an amount equal to $100 per share plus any accrued but unpaid dividends. This redemption right could expose us to a liquidity risk if we do not have sufficient cash resources at hand or are not able to find financing on sufficiently attractive terms to comply with our obligations to repurchase the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock upon exercise of such redemption right.

In June and July 2021, we issued 3,188,533 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. The rights of the holders of our Series B Preferred Stock with respect to dividends, distributions and payments upon liquidation rank junior to similar obligations to our holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and senior to similar obligations to our holders of common stock. Holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on each share of such stock equal to 7.625% per annum on the liquidation preference of $25.00 per share. The dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock are cumulative and non-compounding and must be paid before we pay any dividends on the common stock.

In the event of our liquidation, dissolution or the winding up of our affairs, the holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock have the right to receive a liquidation preference entitling them to be paid out of our assets generally available for distribution to our equity holders and before any payment may be made to holders of our common stock.

Our obligations to the holders of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock also could limit our ability to obtain additional financing or increase our borrowing costs, which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and the value of our common stock.

Ouroutstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has anti-dilution protection that, if triggered, could cause substantial dilution to our then-existing holders of common stock, which could adversely affect our stock price. The document governing the terms of our outstanding Series A Convertible Preferred Stock contains anti-dilution provisions to benefit the holders of such stock. As a result, if we, in the future, issue common stock or other derivative securities, subject to specified exceptions, for a per share price less than the then existing conversion price of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, an adjustment to the then current conversion price would occur. This reduction in the conversion price could result in substantial dilution to our then-existing holders of common stock, adversely affecting the price of our common stock.

In the past, we have not paid cash dividends on our common stock on a regular basis, and an increase in the market price of our common stock, if any, may be the sole source of gain on an investment in our common stock. With the exception of dividends payable on our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock, we currently plan to retain any future earnings for use in the operation and expansion of our business and may not pay any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. The declaration and payment of all future dividends on our common stock, if any, will be at the sole discretion of our board of directors, which retains the right to change our dividend policy at any time. Any decision by our board of directors to declare and pay dividends in the future will depend on, among other things, our results of operations, financial condition, cash requirements, contractual restrictions, restrictions on dividends imposed by the documents governing the terms of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock and other factors that our board of directors may deem relevant. Consequently, appreciation in the market price of our common stock, if any, may be the sole source of gain on an investment in our common stock for the foreseeable future. Holders of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to receive dividends on such stock that are cumulative and noncompounding and must be paid before we pay any dividends on the common stock.

Wehave the ability to issue additional preferred stock, warrants, convertible debt and other securities without shareholder approval. Our common stock may be subordinate to additional classes of preferred stock issued in the future in the payment of dividends and other distributions made with respect to common stock, including distributions upon liquidation or dissolution. Our Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation (the "Articles of Incorporation") permit our board of directors to issue preferred stock without first obtaining shareholder approval, which we did in December 2019 when we issued the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and in June and July 2021 when we issued the Series B Preferred Stock. If we issue additional classes of preferred stock, these additional securities may have dividend or liquidation preferences senior to the common stock. If we issue additional classes of convertible preferred stock, a subsequent conversion may dilute the current common shareholders’ interest. We have similar abilities to issue convertible debt, warrants and other equity securities.

Our executive officers, directors and parties related to them, in the aggregate, control a majority of our common stock and may have the ability to control matters requiring shareholder approval. Our executive officers, directors and parties related to them own a large enough share of our common stock to have an influence on, if not control of, the matters presented to shareholders. As a result, these shareholders may have the ability to control matters requiring shareholder approval, including the election and removal of directors, the approval of significant corporate transactions, such as any reclassification, reorganization, merger, consolidation or sale of all or substantially all of our assets and the control of our management and affairs. Accordingly, this concentration of ownership may have the effect of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of us, impede a merger, consolidation, takeover or other business combination involving us or discourage a potential acquirer from making a tender offer or otherwise attempting to obtain control of us, adversely affecting the market price of our common stock.

The Series B Preferred Stock rank junior to our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and all of our indebtedness and other liabilities and are effectively junior to all indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. In the event of our bankruptcy, liquidation, dissolution or winding-up of our affairs, our assets will be available to pay obligations on the Series B Preferred Stock only after all of our indebtedness and other liabilities have been paid and the liquidation preference of the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock has been satisfied. The rights of holders of the Series B Preferred Stock to participate in the distribution of our assets will rank junior to the prior claims of our current and future creditors, the Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and any future series or class of preferred stock we may issue that ranks senior to the Series B Preferred Stock. Our Articles of Incorporation authorize us to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series on terms determined by our board of directors, and we currently have outstanding 400,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 3,255,967 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. We may issue up to 6,344,033 additional shares of preferred stock.

In addition, the Series B Preferred Stock effectively ranks junior to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of (as well as any preferred equity interests held by others in) our existing subsidiaries and any future subsidiaries. Our existing subsidiaries are, and any future subsidiaries would be, separate legal entities and have no legal obligation to pay any amounts to us in respect of dividends due on the Series B Preferred Stock. If we are forced to liquidate our assets to pay our creditors and holders of our Series A Convertible Preferred Stock, we may not have sufficient assets to pay amounts due on any or all of the Series B Preferred Stock then outstanding. We and our subsidiaries have incurred and may in the future incur substantial amounts of debt and other obligations that will rank senior to the Series B Preferred Stock. We may incur additional indebtedness and become more highly leveraged in the future, harming our financial position and potentially limiting our cash available to pay dividends. As a result, we may not have sufficient funds remaining to satisfy our dividend obligations relating to our Series B Preferred Stock if we incur additional indebtedness or issue additional preferred stock that ranks senior to the Series B Preferred Stock.

Future offerings of debt or senior equity securities may adversely affect the market price of the Series B Preferred Stock. If we decide to issue debt or senior equity securities in the future, it is possible that these securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. Additionally, any convertible or exchangeable securities that we issue in the future may have rights, preferences and privileges more favorable than those of the Series B Preferred Stock and may result in dilution to holders of the Series B Preferred Stock. We and, indirectly, our shareholders will bear the cost of issuing and servicing such securities. Because our decision to issue debt or equity securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we do not know the amount, timing or nature of any future offerings. Thus, holders of the Series B Preferred Stock bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of the Series B Preferred Stock and diluting the value of their holdings in us.

Wemay issue additional shares of the Series B Preferred Stock and additional series of preferred stock that rank on a parity with the Series B Preferred Stock as to dividend rights, rights upon liquidation or voting rights. We are allowed to issue additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock and additional series of preferred stock that would rank on a parity with the Series B Preferred Stock as to dividend payments and rights upon our liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our affairs pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation and the Amended and Restated Articles of Amendment Establishing the Series B Preferred Stock without any vote of the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock. Our Articles of Incorporation authorize us to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock in one or more series on terms determined by our board of directors, and we currently have outstanding 400,000 shares of Series A Convertible Preferred Stock and 3,255,967 shares of Series B Preferred Stock. We may issue up to 6,344,033 additional shares of preferred stock. The issuance of additional shares of Series B Preferred Stock and additional series of parity preferred stock could have the effect of reducing the amounts available to the holders of Series B Preferred Stock upon our liquidation or dissolution or the winding up of our affairs. It also may reduce dividend payments on the Series B Preferred Stock if we do not have sufficient funds to pay dividends on all Series B Preferred Stock outstanding and other classes of stock with equal priority with respect to dividends.

In addition, although holders of the Series B Preferred Stock are entitled to limited voting rights with respect to such matters, the holders of the Series B Preferred Stock will vote separately as a class along with all other outstanding series of our preferred stock that we may issue upon which like voting rights have been conferred and are exercisable. As a result, the voting rights of holders of the Series B Preferred Stock may be significantly diluted, and the holders of such other series of preferred stock that we may issue may be able to control or significantly influence the outcome of any vote.

Future issuances and sales of parity preferred stock, or the perception that such issuances and sales could occur, may cause prevailing market prices for the Series B Preferred Stock and our common stock to decline and may adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital in the financial markets at times and prices favorable to us. Such issuances may also reduce or eliminate our ability to pay dividends on our common stock.

Holders of Series B Preferred Stock have extremely limited voting rights. Holders of Series B Preferred Stock have limited voting rights. Our common stock is the only class of our securities that carries full voting rights. Voting rights for holders of Series B Preferred Stock exist primarily with respect to the ability to elect (together with the holders of other outstanding series of our preferred stock, or additional series of preferred stock we may issue in the future and upon which similar voting rights have been or are in the future conferred and are exercisable) two additional directors to our board of directors in the event that six quarterly dividends (whether or not declared or consecutive) payable on the Series B Preferred Stock are in arrears, and with respect to voting on amendments to our Articles of Incorporation or Amended and Restated Articles of Amendment Establishing the Series B Preferred Stock (in some cases voting together with the holders of other outstanding series of our preferred stock as a single class) that materially and adversely affect the rights of the holders of Series B Preferred Stock (and other series of preferred stock, as applicable) or create additional classes or series of our stock that are senior to the Series B Preferred Stock, provided that in any event adequate provision for redemption has not been made. Other than in limited circumstances, holders of Series B Preferred Stock do not have any voting rights.

The conversion feature of the Series B Preferred Stock may not adequately compensate holders of such stock, and the conversion and redemption features of the Series B Preferred Stock may make it more difficult for a party to take over our company and may discourage a party from taking over the Company. Upon the occurrence of a Delisting Event or Change of Control (as defined in the document governing the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock), holders of the Series B Preferred Stock will have the right (unless, prior to the Delisting Event Conversion Date or Change of Control Conversion Date, as applicable, we have provided or provide notice of our election to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock) to convert some or all of the Series B Preferred Stock into our common stock (or equivalent value of alternative consideration), and under these circumstances we will also have a special optional redemption right to redeem the Series B Preferred Stock. Upon such a conversion, the holders will be limited to a maximum number of shares of our common stock equal to the Share Cap (as defined in the document governing the terms of the Series B Preferred Stock) multiplied by the number of shares of Series B Preferred Stock converted. If the common stock price is less than $19.275, subject to adjustment, the holders will receive a maximum of 1.29702 shares of our common stock per share of Series B Preferred Stock, which may result in a holder receiving value that is less than the liquidation preference of the Series B Preferred Stock. In addition, those features of the Series B Preferred Stock may have the effect of inhibiting a third party from making an acquisition proposal for our Company or of delaying, deferring or preventing a change of control of the Company under circumstances that otherwise could provide the holders of our common stock and Series B Preferred Stock with the opportunity to realize a premium over the then-current market price or that shareholders may otherwise believe is in their best interests.

Holdersof Series B Preferred Stock may be unable to use the dividends-received deduction and may not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income.” Distributions paid to corporate U.S. holders on the Series B Preferred Stock may be eligible for the dividends-received deduction, and distributions paid to non-corporate U.S. holders on the Series B Preferred Stock may be subject to tax at the preferential tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income,” if we have current or accumulated earnings and profits, as determined for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Although we presently have accumulated earnings and profits, we may not have sufficient current or accumulated earnings and profits during future fiscal years for the distributions on the Series B Preferred Stock to qualify as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If any distributions on the Series B Preferred Stock with respect to any fiscal year fail to be treated as dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes, corporate U.S. holders would be unable to use the dividends-received deduction and non-corporate U.S. holders may not be eligible for the preferential tax rates applicable to “qualified dividend income” and generally would be required to reduce their tax basis in the Series B Preferred Stock by the extent to which the distribution is not treated as a dividend.

Holders of Series B Preferred Stock may be subject to tax if we make or fail to make certain adjustments to the conversion rate of the Series B Preferred Stock even though such holders do not receive a corresponding cash dividend. The conversion rate for the Series B Preferred Stock is subject to adjustment in certain circumstances. A failure to adjust (or to adjust adequately) the conversion rate after an event that increases the proportionate interest of the Series B Preferred Stock holders in us could be treated as a deemed taxable dividend to you. If a holder is a non-U.S. holder, any deemed dividend may be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate, or such lower rate as may be specified by an applicable treaty, which may be set off against subsequent payments on the Series B Preferred Stock. In April 2016, the U.S. Treasury issued proposed income tax regulations in regard to the taxability of changes in conversion rights that will apply to the Series B Preferred Stock when published in final form and may be applied to us before final publication in certain instances.

The indenture governing the 6.125% Senior Notes due 2026 (the “Senior Notes”) does not prohibit us from incurring additional indebtedness. If we incur any additional indebtedness that ranks equally with the Senior Notes, the holders of that debt will be entitled to share ratably with holders of the Senior Notes in any proceeds distributed in connection with any insolvency, liquidation, reorganization or dissolution. This may have the effect of reducing the amount of proceeds paid to holders of Senior Notes. Incurrence of additional debt would also further reduce the cash available to invest in operations, as a result of increased debt service obligations. If new debt is added to our current debt levels, the related risks that we now face could intensify.

Our level of indebtedness could have important consequences to holders of the Senior Notes, because:

Our operations may not generate sufficient cash to enable us to service our debt. If we fail to make a payment on the Senior Notes, we could be in default on the Senior Notes, and this default could cause us to be in default on other indebtedness, to the extent outstanding. Conversely, a default under any other indebtedness, if not waived, could result in acceleration of the debt outstanding under the related agreement and entitle the holders thereof to bring suit for the enforcement thereof or exercise other remedies provided thereunder. In addition, such default or acceleration may result in an event of default and acceleration of other indebtedness, entitling the holders thereof to bring suit for the enforcement thereof or exercise other remedies provided thereunder. If a judgment is obtained by any such holders, such holders could seek to collect on such judgment from the assets of Atlanticus. If that should occur, we may not be able to pay all such debt or to borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. Even if new financing were then available, it may not be on terms that are acceptable to us.

However, no event of default under the Senior Notes would result from a default or acceleration of, or suit, other exercise of remedies or collection proceeding by holders of, our other outstanding debt, if any. As a result, all or substantially all of our assets may be used to satisfy claims of holders of our other outstanding debt, if any, without the holders of the Senior Notes having any rights to such assets.

The Senior Notes are unsecured and therefore are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness that we currently have or that we may incur in the future. The Senior Notes are not secured by any of our assets or any of the assets of our subsidiaries. As a result, the Senior Notes are effectively subordinated to any secured indebtedness that we or our subsidiaries have currently outstanding or may incur in the future to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness. The indenture governing the Senior Notes does not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from incurring additional secured (or unsecured) indebtedness in the future. In any liquidation, dissolution, bankruptcy or other similar proceeding, the holders of any of our existing or future secured indebtedness and the secured indebtedness of our subsidiaries may assert rights against the assets pledged to secure that indebtedness and may consequently receive payment from these assets before they may be used to pay other creditors, including the holders of the Senior Notes.

TheSenior Notes are structurally subordinated to the indebtedness and other liabilities of our subsidiaries. The Senior Notes are obligations exclusively of Atlanticus and not of any of our subsidiaries. None of our subsidiaries is a guarantor of the Notes, and the Notes are not required to be guaranteed by any subsidiaries we may acquire or create in the future. Therefore, in any bankruptcy, liquidation or similar proceeding, all claims of creditors (including trade creditors) of our subsidiaries will have priority over our equity interests in such subsidiaries (and therefore the claims of our creditors, including holders of the Senior Notes) with respect to the assets of such subsidiaries. Even if we are recognized as a creditor of one or more of our subsidiaries, our claims would still be effectively subordinated to any security interests in the assets of any such subsidiary and to any indebtedness or other liabilities of any such subsidiary senior to our claims. Consequently, the Senior Notes are structurally subordinated to all indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of any of our subsidiaries and any subsidiaries that we may in the future acquire or establish as financing vehicles or otherwise. The indenture governing the Senior Notes does not prohibit us or our subsidiaries from incurring additional indebtedness in the future or granting liens on our assets or the assets of our subsidiaries to secure any such additional indebtedness. In addition, future debt and security agreements entered into by our subsidiaries may contain various restrictions, including restrictions on payments by our subsidiaries to us and the transfer by our subsidiaries of assets pledged as collateral.

The indenture governing the Senior Notes contains limited protection for holders of the Senior Notes. The indenture under which the Senior Notes were issued offers limited protection to holders of the Senior Notes. The terms of the indenture and the Senior Notes do not restrict our or any of our subsidiaries’ ability to engage in, or otherwise be a party to, a variety of corporate transactions, circumstances or events that could have an adverse impact on the Senior Notes. In particular, the terms of the indenture and the Senior Notes does not place any restrictions on our or our subsidiaries’ ability to:

In addition, the indenture does not include any protection against certain events, such as a change of control, a leveraged recapitalization or “going private” transaction (which may result in a significant increase of our indebtedness levels), restructuring or similar transactions. Furthermore, the terms of the indenture and the Notes does not protect holders of the Senior Notes in the event that we experience changes (including significant adverse changes) in our financial condition, results of operations or credit ratings, as they do not require that we or our subsidiaries adhere to any financial tests or ratios or specified levels of net worth, revenues, income, cash flow, or liquidity. Also, an event of default or acceleration under our other indebtedness would not necessarily result in an “event of default” under the Senior Notes.

Our ability to recapitalize, incur additional debt and take a number of other actions that are not limited by the terms of the indenture may have important consequences for holders of the Senior Notes, including making it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to the Senior Notes or negatively affecting the trading value of the Senior Notes.

Other debt we issue or incur in the future could contain more protections for its holders than the indenture and the Senior Notes, including additional covenants and events of default. The issuance or incurrence of any such debt with incremental protections could affect the market for and trading levels and prices of the Senior Notes.

Wemay not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of our debt, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy our obligations under such indebtedness, which may not be successful. Our ability to make scheduled payments on, or to refinance our obligations under, our debt will depend on our financial and operating performance and that of our subsidiaries, which, in turn, will be subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to financial and business factors, many of which may be beyond our control.

We may not maintain a level of cash flow from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on our indebtedness. If our cash flow and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, sell assets, seek to obtain additional equity capital or restructure our debt. In the future, our cash flow and capital resources may not be sufficient for payments of interest on, and principal of, our debt, and such alternative measures may not be successful and may not permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations. We may not be able to refinance any of our indebtedness or obtain additional financing. In the absence of such operating results and resources, we could face substantial liquidity problems and might be required to dispose of material assets or operations to meet our debt service and other obligations. We may not be able to consummate those sales, or if we do, at an opportune time, the proceeds that we realize may not be adequate to meet debt service obligations when due. Repayment of our indebtedness, to a certain degree, is also dependent on the generation of cash flows by our subsidiaries (none of which are guarantors of the Senior Notes) and their ability to make such cash available to us, by dividend, loan, debt repayment, or otherwise. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or be permitted to, make distributions or other payments to enable us to make payments in respect of our indebtedness. Each of our subsidiaries is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, applicable U.S. and foreign legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from our subsidiaries. In the event that we do not receive distributions or other payments from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to make required payments on our indebtedness.

An increase in market interest rates could result in a decrease in the value of the Senior Notes. In general, as market interest rates rise, notes bearing interest at a fixed rate decline in value. Consequently, if market interest rates increase, the market value of the Senior Notes may decline.

We may issue additional notes. Under the terms of the indenture governing the Senior Notes, we may from time to time without notice to, or the consent of, the holders of the Senior Notes, create and issue additional notes which may rank equally with the Senior Notes. If any such additional notes are not fungible with the Senior Notes initially offered hereby for U.S. federal income tax purposes, such additional notes will have one or more separate CUSIP numbers.

The rating for the Senior Notes could at any time be revised downward or withdrawn entirely at the discretion of the issuing rating agency. Ratings only reflect the views of the issuing rating agency or agencies and such ratings could at any time be revised downward or withdrawn entirely at the discretion of the issuing rating agency. A rating is not a recommendation to purchase, sell or hold the Senior Notes. Ratings do not reflect market prices or suitability of a security for a particular investor and the rating of the Senior Notes may not reflect all risks related to us and our business, or the structure or market value of the Senior Notes. We may elect to issue other securities for which we may seek to obtain a rating in the future. If we issue other securities with a rating, such ratings, if they are lower than market expectations or are subsequently lowered or withdrawn, could adversely affect the market for or the market value of the Senior Notes.

The risk factors presented above are all of the ones that we currently consider material. However, they are not the only ones facing our company. Additional risks not presently known to us, or which we currently consider immaterial, also may adversely affect us. There may be risks that a particular investor views differently from us, and our analysis might be wrong. If any of the risks that we face actually occurs, our business, financial condition and operating results could be materially adversely affected and could differ materially from any possible results suggested by any forward-looking statements that we have made or might make. In such case, the trading price of our common stock or other securities could decline, and you could lose part or all of your investment. We expressly disclaim any obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law.

The information in response to this item is included in our consolidated financial statements, together with the reports thereon of BDO USA, P.C., beginning on page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K/A, which follows the signature page hereto.

As of December 31, 2022, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Act) was carried out on behalf of Atlanticus Holdings Corporation and our subsidiaries by our management and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial officer).

At the time we filed the Original Form 10-K, our principal executive officer and principal financial officer had concluded that as of December 31, 2022, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective. As part of the preparation of the Company’s June 30, 2023 interim financial statements, the Company’s management determined that management did not appropriately design and implement management review controls that included sufficient documentary evidence to support the precision of review over the development of cash flow forecasts used in the calculation of the fair value estimate of loans, interest and fees receivable at fair value. Thus, these controls were not operating effectively. As a result, our principal executive officer and our principal financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of December 31, 2022 because of this material weakness in our internal control over financial reporting.

Notwithstanding this material weakness, the Company has concluded that no material misstatements exist in the consolidated financial statements as filed on the Original Form 10-K, and as included in this Amendment, and such financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, there are no changes to the Company’s previously-reported consolidated financial statements.

Restated Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management of Atlanticus Holdings Corporation is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) for Atlanticus Holdings Corporation and our subsidiaries. Our management conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the framework in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) Internal Control-Integrated Framework (2013 framework).

In Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting included in the Original Form 10-K, our management previously concluded that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. Subsequent to the filing date of the Original Form 10-K, management has concluded that the material weakness described above existed as of December 31, 2022. As a result, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria in the COSO 2013 framework. Accordingly, management has restated its report on internal control over financial reporting.

The effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, has been audited by BDO USA, P.C., an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their accompanying revised report on page F-1 of the attached financial statements.

The Company’s management is committed to maintaining a strong internal control environment. In response to the material weakness identified above, management, with the oversight of the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors, evaluated the material weakness described above and designed a remediation plan to enhance the Company’s internal control environment. To remediate the material weakness, the Company’s management performed an evaluation of the relevant controls, and implemented procedures to enhance documentation, and retain incremental evidence that supports the effectiveness of controls related to the development and review of cash flow forecasts used in the calculation of fair value estimate of loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value. These enhanced procedures were implemented as of June 30, 2023, and will be monitored for effectiveness.

During the quarter ended December 31, 2022, no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Act) occurred that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

The Company’s management, including its principal executive officer and principal financial officer, do not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or the Company’s internal control over financial reporting will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of a simple error or mistake. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people or by management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Due to inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, the Registrant has duly caused this Report on Form 10-K/A to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, in the City of Atlanta, State of Georgia, on November 8, 2023.

We have audited Atlanticus Holdings Corporation’s (the “Company’s”) internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the “COSO criteria”). In our opinion, the Company did not maintain, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on the COSO criteria. In our report dated March 14, 2023, we expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022. Subsequent to March 14, 2023, Management revised its assessment of internal control over financial reporting due to the identification of a material weakness, as described below. Accordingly, our opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022 expressed herein is different from that expressed in our previous report.

We do not express an opinion or any other form of assurance on management’s statements referring to any corrective actions taken by the Company after the date of management’s assessment.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the consolidated balance sheets of the Company as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and temporary equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes and our report dated March 14, 2023, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Item 9A, Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit of internal control over financial reporting in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. A material weakness exists regarding management’s failure to design and implement management review controls that included sufficient documentary evidence to support the precision of review over the development of cash flow forecasts used in the calculation of the fair value estimate of loans, interest and fees receivable at fair value. This material weakness was considered in determining the nature, timing, and extent of audit tests applied in our audit of the 2022 consolidated financial statements, and this report does not affect our report dated March 14, 2023 on those consolidated financial statements.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

March 14, 2023, except as to the effect of the material weakness, which is dated November 8, 2023.

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2022 and 2021, the related consolidated statements of income, shareholders’ equity and temporary equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the “consolidated financial statements”). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company at December 31, 2022 and 2021, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2022, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (“PCAOB”), the Company's internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2022, based on criteria established in Internal Control – Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) and our report dated March 14, 2023, and November 8, 2023, as to the effects of the material weakness as described in Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, expressed an adverse opinion on the Company's internal control over financial reporting because of a material weakness.

These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

The critical audit matter communicated below is a matter arising from the current period audit of the consolidated financial statements that was communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that: (1) relate(s) to accounts or disclosures that are material to the consolidated financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex judgments. The communication of critical audit matter(s) does not alter in any way our opinion on the consolidated financial statements, taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matter below, providing separate opinions on the critical audit matter or on the accounts or disclosures to which it relates.

As described in Note 2 and Note 6 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements, the Company has outstanding loans, interest, and fees receivable, at fair value of $1,818 million at December 31, 2022. As of January 1, 2022 all receivables associated with the Company’s private label credit and general purpose credit cards are included within loans, interest, and fees receivable, at fair value. The Company estimates the fair value of these receivables using a discounted cash flow model and reevaluates their fair value at the end of each quarter. The discounted cash flow model assumptions used to determine the performance expectation include timing of expected cash flows and discount rates. The impact of changes in the fair value of loans, interest, and fees receivable, at fair value is reflected within the period incurred and can have a material impact on the financial results of the Company.

We identified the significant assumptions used by the Company in the discounted cash flow model used to estimate the fair value of outstanding loans, interest, and fees receivable, at fair value to be a critical audit matter. The significant assumptions impacting the fair value calculation include the timing of expected cash flows and discount rates applied. Auditing these significant assumptions involved especially challenging auditor judgment due to the nature and extent of audit evidence and effort required to address these matters including the involvement of individuals with specialized skill and knowledge.

The primary procedures we performed to address this critical audit matter included:

	*December 31,*			*December 31,*
	*2022*			*2021*

Assets
Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (including $202.2 million and $209.5 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)	$	384,984		$	409,660
Restricted cash and cash equivalents (including $27.6 million and $75.9 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)		48,208			96,968
Loans, interest and fees receivable:
Loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value (including $1,735.9 million and $925.5 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)		1,817,976			1,026,424
Loans, interest and fees receivable, gross (including $0 and $369.6 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)		105,267			470,293
Allowances for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable (including $0 and $55.1 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)		(1,643	)		(57,201	)
Deferred revenue (including $0 and $8.2 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)		(16,190	)		(29,281	)
Net loans, interest and fees receivable		1,905,410			1,410,235
Property at cost, net of depreciation		10,013			7,335
Operating lease right-of-use assets		11,782			4,016
Prepaid expenses and other assets		27,417			15,649
Total assets	$	2,387,814		$	1,943,863
Liabilities
Accounts payable and accrued expenses	$	44,332		$	42,287
Operating lease liabilities		20,112			4,842
Notes payable, net (including $1,586.0 million and $1,223.4 million associated with variable interest entities at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively)		1,653,306			1,278,864
Senior notes, net		144,385			142,951
Income tax liability		60,689			47,770
Total liabilities		1,922,824			1,516,714

Commitments and contingencies (Note 11)

Preferred stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized:
Series A preferred stock, 400,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 (liquidation preference - $40.0 million); 400,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 (Note 4) (1)		40,000			40,000
Class B preferred units issued to noncontrolling interests (Note 4)		99,950			99,650

Shareholders' Equity
Series B preferred stock, no par value, 3,204,640 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 (liquidation preference - $80.1 million); 3,188,533 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2021 (1)		—			—
Common stock, no par value, 150,000,000 shares authorized: 14,453,415 and 14,804,408 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively		—			—
Paid-in capital		121,996			227,763
Retained earnings		204,415			60,236
Total shareholders’ equity		326,411			287,999
Noncontrolling interests		(1,371	)		(500	)
Total equity		325,040			287,499
Total liabilities, preferred stock and equity	$	2,387,814		$	1,943,863

(1) Both the Series A preferred stock and the Series B preferred stock have no par value and are part of the same aggregate 10,000,000 shares authorized.

	*For the Year Ended*
	*2022*			*2021*			*2020*
Revenue:
Consumer loans, including past due fees	$	786,235		$	518,783		$	410,616
Fees and related income on earning assets		217,071			194,466			133,960
Other revenue		42,798			30,606			15,431
Total operating revenue, net		1,046,104			743,855			560,007
Other non-operating revenue		809			4,201			3,403
Total revenue		1,046,913			748,056			563,410

Interest expense		(81,851	)		(54,127	)		(51,548	)
Provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable recorded at amortized cost		(1,252	)		(36,455	)		(142,719	)
Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value		(577,069	)		(218,733	)		(108,548	)
Net margin		386,741			438,741			260,595

Operating expense:
Salaries and benefits		43,063			34,024			29,079
Card and loan servicing		95,428			75,397			63,047
Marketing and solicitation		62,403			56,635			35,012
Depreciation		2,175			1,493			1,247
Other		34,400			22,180			17,819
Total operating expense		237,469			189,729			146,204
Loss on repurchase and redemption of convertible senior notes		—			29,439			—
Income before income taxes		149,272			219,573			114,391
Income tax expense		(14,660	)		(41,784	)		(20,474	)
Net income		134,612			177,789			93,917
Net loss attributable to noncontrolling interests		985			113			203
Net income attributable to controlling interests		135,597			177,902			94,120
Preferred dividends and discount accretion		(25,076	)		(22,363	)		(17,070	)
Net income attributable to common shareholders	$	110,521		$	155,539		$	77,050
Net income attributable to common shareholders per common share—basic	$	7.55		$	10.32		$	5.32
Net income attributable to common shareholders per common share—diluted	$	5.83		$	7.56		$	3.95

	Series B Preferred Stock				Common Stock																	Temporary Equity
	Shares Issued		Amount		Shares Issued			Amount		Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings (Deficit)			Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity			Class B Preferred Units		Series A Preferred Stock
Balance at December 31, 2019		—	$	—		15,885,314		$	—	$	212,692		$	(211,786	)	$	(571	)	$	335		$	49,050	$	40,000
Accretion of discount associated with issuance of subsidiary equity		—		—		—			—		(300	)		—			—			(300	)		300		—
Preferred dividends		—		—		—			—		(16,770	)		—			—			(16,770	)		—		—
Stock option exercises and proceeds related thereto		—		—		407,533			—		1,326			—			—			1,326			—		—
Compensatory stock issuances, net of forfeitures		—		—		68,040			—		—			—			—			—			—		—
Contributions by preferred shareholders		—		—		—			—		—			—			—			—			50,000
Stock-based compensation costs		—		—		—			—		1,355			—			—			1,355			—		—
Redemption and retirement of shares		—		—		(245,534	)		—		(3,353	)		—			—			(3,353	)		—		—
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—		—			94,120			(203	)		93,917			—		—
Balance at December 31, 2020		—	$	—		16,115,353		$	—	$	194,950		$	(117,666	)	$	(774	)	$	76,510		$	99,350	$	40,000
Accretion of discount associated with issuance of subsidiary equity		—		—		—			—		(300	)		—			—			(300	)		300		—
Preferred dividends		—		—		—			—		(22,063	)		—			—			(22,063	)		—		—
Stock option exercises and proceeds related thereto		—		—		526,015			—		1,885			—			—			1,885			—		—
Compensatory stock issuances, net of forfeitures		—		—		56,654			—		—			—			—			—			—		—
Issuance of series B preferred stock, net		3,188,533		—		—			—		75,270			—			—			75,270			—		—
Contributions by owners of noncontrolling interests		—		—		—			—		—			—			387			387			—		—
Stock-based compensation costs		—		—		—			—		3,240			—			—			3,240			—		—
Redemption and retirement of shares		—		—		(1,893,614	)		—		(25,219	)		—			—			(25,219	)		—		—
Net income (loss)		—		—		—			—		—			177,902			(113	)		177,789					—
Balance at December 31, 2021		3,188,533	$	—		14,804,408		$	—	$	227,763		$	60,236		$	(500	)	$	287,499		$	99,650	$	40,000

	Series B Preferred Stock					Common Stock																Temporary Equity
	Shares Issued			Amount		Shares Issued			Amount		Paid-In Capital			Retained Earnings (Deficit)		Noncontrolling Interests			Total Equity			Class B Preferred Units		Series A Preferred Stock
Balance at December 31, 2021		3,188,533		$	—		14,804,408		$	—	$	227,763		$	60,236	$	(500	)	$	287,499		$	99,650	$	40,000
Cumulative effects from adoption of the CECL standard							—			—		—			8,582		—			8,582			—		—
Accretion of discount associated with issuance of subsidiary equity		—			—		—			—		(300	)		—		—			(300	)		300		—
Discount associated with repurchase of preferred stock		—			—		—			—		18			—		—			18			—		—
Preferred dividends		—			—		—			—		(24,794	)		—		—			(24,794	)		—		—
Stock option exercises and proceeds related thereto		—			—		1,211,141			—		3,731			—		—			3,731			—		—
Compensatory stock issuances, net of forfeitures		—			—		112,027			—		—			—		—			—			—		—
Issuance of series B preferred stock, net		19,607			—		—			—		437			—		—			437			—		—
Contributions by owners of noncontrolling interests		—			—		—			—		—			—		114			114			—		—
Stock-based compensation costs		—			—		—			—		4,167			—		—			4,167			—		—
Redemption and retirement of preferred shares		(3,500	)		—		—			—		(87	)		—		—			(87	)		—		—
Redemption and retirement of common shares		—			—		(1,674,161	)		—		(88,939	)		—		—			(88,939	)		—		—
Net income (loss)		—			—		—			—		—			135,597		(985	)		134,612			—		—
Balance at December 31, 2022		3,204,640		$	—		14,453,415		$	—	$	121,996		$	204,415	$	(1,371	)	$	325,040		$	99,950	$	40,000

	*For the Year Ended December 31,*
	*2022*			*2021*			*2020*
Operating activities
Net income	$	134,612		$	177,789		$	93,917
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation, amortization and accretion, net		4,848			2,494			7,952
Provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable		1,252			36,455			142,719
Interest expense from accretion of discount on notes		—			453			585
Income from accretion of merchant fees and discount associated with receivables purchases		(137,179	)		(166,266	)		(110,402	)
Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value		577,069			218,733			108,548
Amortization of deferred loan costs		5,101			5,114			5,137
Income from equity-method investments		—			(16	)		(456	)
Loss on repurchase and redemption of convertible senior notes		—			29,439			—
Stock-based compensation costs		4,167			3,240			1,355
Lease liability payments		(4,053	)		(10,470	)		(10,278	)
Gain on sale of property		—			(599	)		—
Changes in assets and liabilities:
Increase in uncollected fees on earning assets		(252,704	)		(111,807	)		(43,319	)
Increase in income tax liability		10,412			21,838			20,147
Increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses		4,260			6,005			(3,096	)
Other		(1,655	)		(36	)		(75	)
Net cash provided by operating activities		346,130			212,366			212,734

Investing activities
Investments in equity-method investee		—			(398	)		—
Proceeds from equity-method investee		—			560			998
Proceeds from recoveries on charged off receivables		32,361			14,065			13,781
Investments in earning assets		(2,544,477	)		(2,018,760	)		(1,330,980	)
Proceeds from earning assets		1,836,183			1,535,500			1,024,375
Sale of property		—			1,100			—
Purchases and development of property, net of disposals		(4,852	)		(7,089	)		(749	)
Net cash used in investing activities		(680,785	)		(475,022	)		(292,575	)

Financing activities
Noncontrolling interests contributions		114			387			50,000
Proceeds from issuance of Series B preferred stock, net of issuance costs		437			75,270			—
Preferred dividends		(24,793	)		(21,809	)		(13,561	)
Proceeds from exercise of stock options		3,731			1,885			1,326
Purchase and retirement of outstanding stock		(89,008	)		(25,219	)		(3,353	)
Proceeds from issuance of Senior notes, net of issuance costs		—			142,832			—
Proceeds from borrowings		680,527			923,477			588,229
Repayment of borrowings		(309,753	)		(586,495	)		(460,256	)
Net cash provided by financing activities		261,255			510,328			162,385
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash		(36	)		(5	)		23
Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash		(73,436	)		247,667			82,567
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of period		506,628			258,961			176,394
Cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period	$	433,192		$	506,628		$	258,961
Supplemental cash flow information
Cash paid for interest	$	75,357		$	47,608		$	46,526
Net cash income tax payments	$	4,248		$	19,946		$	327
Increase in accrued and unpaid preferred dividends	$	1		$	254		$	3,209

Our accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (the “Company”) and those entities we control. We are a purpose driven financial technology company. We are primarily focused on facilitating consumer credit through the use of our financial technology and related services. Through our subsidiaries, we provide technology and other support services to lenders who offer an array of financial products and services to consumers who may have been declined by other providers of credit.

We are principally engaged in providing products and services to lenders in the U.S. and, in most cases, we invest in the receivables originated by lenders who utilize our technology platform and other related services. From time to time, we also purchase receivables portfolios from third parties. In these Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, “receivables” or “loans” typically refer to receivables we have purchased from our bank partners or from third parties.

Within our Credit as a Service (“CaaS”) segment, we apply our technology solutions, in combination with the experiences gained, and infrastructure built from servicing over $30 billion in consumer loans over more than 25 years of operating history, to support lenders in offering more inclusive financial services. These products include private label credit and general purpose credit cards originated by lenders through multiple channels, including retailers and healthcare providers, direct mail solicitation, digital marketing and partnerships with third parties. The services of our bank partners are often extended to consumers who may not have access to financing options with larger financial institutions. Our flexible technology solutions allow our bank partners to integrate our paperless process and instant decisioning platform with the existing infrastructure of participating retailers, healthcare providers and other service providers. Using our technology and proprietary predictive analytics, lenders can make instant credit decisions utilizing hundreds of inputs from multiple sources and thereby offer credit to consumers overlooked by many providers of financing who focus exclusively on consumers with higher FICO scores. Atlanticus’ underwriting process is enhanced by artificial intelligence and machine learning, enabling fast, sound decision-making when it matters most.

We also report within our CaaS segment: 1) servicing income; and 2) gains or losses associated with investments previously made in consumer finance technology platforms. These include investments in companies engaged in mobile technologies, marketplace lending and other financial technologies. None of these companies are publicly-traded and the carrying value of our investment in these companies is not material.

Within our Auto Finance segment, our CAR subsidiary operations principally purchase and/or service loans secured by automobiles from or for, and also provide floor plan financing for, a pre-qualified network of independent automotive dealers and automotive finance companies in the buy-here, pay-here, used car business. We purchase auto loans at a discount and with dealer retentions or holdbacks that provide risk protection. Also within our Auto Finance segment, we are providing certain installment lending products in addition to our traditional loans secured by automobiles.

In March 2020, a national emergency was declared under the National Emergencies Act due to a new strain of coronavirus ("COVID-19"). The COVID-19 pandemic has negatively impacted global supply chains and business operations. In addition, rising inflation in 2021 and 2022 resulted in increased costs for many goods and services. As a result of persistently high inflation, interest rates have been on the rise and are expected to continue rising in the near term. The combination of rising inoculation rates in the U.S. population and the federal COVID-19 relief package contributed to increased economic recovery in 2021; however, fiscal support of businesses and individuals has declined. Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has intensified supply chain disruptions and heightened uncertainty surrounding the near-term outlook for the broader economy. The impacts of new COVID-19 variants, responses to the COVID-19 pandemic by both consumers and governments, rising energy costs, inflation, rising interest rates, and the unresolved geopolitical tensions relating to Russia’s invasion of Ukraine could significantly affect the economic outlook. The duration and severity of the effects of COVID-19 on our financial condition, results of operations and liquidity remain uncertain. Likewise, we do not know the duration and severity of the impact of COVID-19 on all members of the Company’s ecosystem – our bank partner, merchants and consumers – as well as our employees. We continue to monitor the ongoing pandemic, have modified certain business practices, including offering consumers greater payment flexibility. These and similar practices have also been adopted by certain of our third party service partners.

The following is a summary of significant accounting policies we follow in preparing our consolidated financial statements, as well as a description of significant components of our consolidated financial statements.

We prepare our consolidated financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the U.S. (“GAAP”). The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of our consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during each reporting period. We base these estimates on information available to us as of the date of the financial statements. Actual results could differ materially from these estimates. Certain estimates, such as credit losses, payment rates, costs of funds, discount rates and the yields earned on credit card receivables, significantly affect the reported amount (and changes thereon) of our Loans, interest and fees receivables, at fair value and Notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value on our consolidated balance sheets and consolidated statements of income. Additionally, estimates of credit losses have a significant effect on loans, interest and fees receivable, net, as shown on our consolidated balance sheets, as well as on the provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable within our consolidated statements of income.

We have eliminated all significant intercompany balances and transactions for financial reporting purposes.

Unrestricted cash and cash equivalents consist of cash, money market investments and overnight deposits. We consider all highly liquid cash investments with low interest rate risk and original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost, which approximates market. We maintain unrestricted cash and cash equivalents for general operating purposes and to meet our longer term debt obligations. We maintain our cash and cash equivalents in accounts at regulated domestic financial institutions in amounts that exceed FDIC insured amounts of approximately $4.5 million based on our current banking relationships.

Restricted cash as of December 31, 2022 and 2021 includes certain collections on loans, interest and fees receivable, the cash balances of which are required to be distributed to noteholders under our debt facilities. Our restricted cash balances also include minimum cash balances held in accounts at the request of certain of our business partners.

We maintain two categories of Loans, Interest and Fees Receivable on our consolidated balance sheets: those that are carried at fair value (Loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value) and those that are carried at net amortized cost (Loans, interest and fees receivable, gross). For both categories of loans, interest and fees receivable, other than our Auto Finance receivables, interest and fees are discontinued when loans, interest and fees receivable become contractually 90 or more days past due. We charge off our CaaS receivables, against our Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value, when they become contractually more than 180 days past due. We charge off our Auto Finance segment receivables, against our Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable, when they become contractually more than 180 days past due. For all of our receivables portfolios, we charge off receivables within 30 days of notification and confirmation of a customer’s bankruptcy or death. However, in some cases of death, we do not charge off receivables if there is a surviving, contractually liable individual or estate large enough to pay the debt in full.

We adopted Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments on January 1, 2022. This ASU requires the use of an impairment model (the current expected credit loss (“CECL”) model) that is based on expected rather than incurred losses. The ASU also allows for a one-time fair value election for receivables. Upon adoption, we elected the fair value option for all remaining loans receivable associated with our private label credit and general purpose credit card platform previously measured at amortized cost and recorded an increase to our Allowances for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable for our remaining Loans, interest and fees receivable associated with our Auto Finance segment. The adoption of CECL resulted in an increase to our opening balance of retained earnings of $8.6 million.

Loans, Interest and Fees Receivable, at Fair Value. Loans, interest and fees receivable held at fair value represent receivables for which we have elected the fair value option (the "Fair Value Receivables"). The Fair Value Receivables are held by entities that qualify as variable interest entities ("VIE"), and are consolidated onto our consolidated balance sheets, some portfolios of which are unencumbered and some of which are still encumbered under structured or other financing facilities. Loans and finance receivables include accrued and unpaid interest and fees. As discussed above, as of January 1, 2022 all receivables associated with our private label credit and general purpose credit cards are included within this category of receivables.

Under the fair value option, direct loan origination fees (such as annual and merchant fees) are taken into income when billed to the consumer or upon loan acquisition and direct loan origination costs are expensed in the period incurred. The Company estimates the fair value of the loans using a discounted cash flow model, which considers various unobservable inputs such as remaining cumulative charge-offs, remaining cumulative prepayments, average life and discount rate. The Company re-evaluates the fair value of loans receivable at the close of each measurement period. Changes in the fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable are recorded as a component of "Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value" in the consolidated statements of income in the period of the fair value changes. Changes in the fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable recorded at fair value include the impact of current period charge-offs associated with these receivables.

Further details concerning our loans, interest and fees receivable held at fair value are presented within Note 6, “Fair Values of Assets and Liabilities.”

Loans, Interest and Fees Receivable, Gross. Our loans, interest and fees receivable, gross, currently consist of receivables associated with our Auto Finance segment’s operations. Prior to January 1, 2022 this category of receivable also included a portion (those which were not part of our Fair Value Receivables) of our private label credit and general purpose credit card receivables within our CaaS segment. Our CaaS segment loans, interest and fees receivable generally are unsecured, while our Auto Finance segment loans, interest and fees receivable generally are secured by the underlying automobiles for which we hold the vehicle title. We purchased auto loans with outstanding principal of $214.7 million and $194.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively, through our pre-qualified network of independent automotive dealers and automotive finance companies.

We show both an allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable and unearned fees (or “deferred revenue”) for our loans, interest and fees receivable that are not carried at fair value. Upon adoption of CECL, the allowance is an estimate of the expected losses (rather than incurred losses) inherent within loans, interest and fees receivable that the Company does not report at fair value. Our loans, interest and fees receivable consist of smaller-balance, homogeneous loans. While each of these categories has unique features, they share many of the same credit risk characteristics and thus share a similar approach to the establishment of an allowance for credit losses. Each portfolio is divided into pools based on common characteristics such as contract or acquisition channel. For each pool, we determine the necessary allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable by analyzing some or all of the following unique attributes for each type of receivable pool: historical loss rates; current delinquency and roll-rate trends; vintage analyses based on the number of months an account has been in existence; the effects of changes in the economy on consumers; changes in underwriting criteria; and estimated recoveries. We may further reduce the expected charge-off, taking into consideration specific dealer level reserves which may allow us to offset our losses and, in the case of secured loans, the impact of collateral available to offset a potential loss.

A considerable amount of judgment is required to assess the ultimate amount of uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable, and we continuously evaluate and update our methodologies to determine the most appropriate allowance necessary. We may individually evaluate a receivable or pool of receivables for impairment if circumstances indicate that the receivable or pool of receivables may be at higher risk for nonperformance than other receivables (e.g., if a particular retail or auto-finance partner has indications of non-performance (such as a bankruptcy) that could impact the underlying pool of receivables we purchased from the partner).

Certain of our loans, interest and fees receivable (including those receivables associated with our private label credit and general purpose credit card receivables prior to their adoption of fair value accounting) also contain components of deferred revenue including merchant fees on the purchases of receivables for our private label credit receivables, loan discounts on the purchase of our auto finance receivables and annual fee billings for our general purpose credit card receivables. Our private label credit, general purpose credit card and auto finance loans, interest and fees receivable include principal balances and associated fees and interest due from customers which are earned each period a loan is outstanding, net of the unearned portion of merchant fees, annual fees and loan discounts. As of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, the weighted average remaining accretion period for the $16.2 million and $29.3 million of deferred revenue reflected in the consolidated balance sheets was 27 months and 15 months, respectively. Included within deferred revenue, are discounts on purchased auto loans of $16.2 million as of December 31, 2022 and merchant fees and discounts of $20.4 million as of December 31, 2021.

As a result of the COVID-19 pandemic and subsequent declaration of a national emergency in March 2020 under the National Emergencies Act and the associated government policy responses and corresponding inflation, certain consumers have been offered the ability to defer their payment without penalty during the national emergency period. In March 2020, the federal bank regulatory agencies issued an “Interagency Statement on Loan Modifications and Reporting for Financial Institutions Working with Customers Affected by the Coronavirus” ("COVID-19 Guidance"). The COVID-19 Guidance encourages financial institutions to work prudently with borrowers that may be unable to meet their contractual obligations because of the effects of COVID-19. In accordance with the COVID-19 Guidance, certain consumers negatively impacted by COVID-19 have been provided short-term payment deferrals and fee waivers. Receivables enrolled in these short-term payment deferrals continue to accrue interest and their delinquency status will not change through the deferment period. Through December 31, 2022 we continued to actively work with consumers that indicated hardship as a result of COVID-19 and inflation pressure; however, the number of impacted consumers is a small part of our overall receivable base. In order to establish appropriate reserves for this population, we considered various factors such as subsequent payment behavior and additional requests by the consumer for further deferrals or hardship claims.

Our CaaS segment consists of two classes of receivable: credit cards and other unsecured lending products. A roll-forward (in millions) of our allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable by class of receivable is as follows:

Delinquent loans, interest and fees receivable reflect the principal, fee and interest components of loans we did not collect on or prior to the contractual due date. Amounts we believe we will not ultimately collect are included as a component in our overall allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable.

Recoveries, noted above, consist of amounts received from the efforts of third-party collectors and through the sale of charged-off accounts to unrelated third parties. All proceeds received, associated with charged-off accounts, are credited to the allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable and effectively offset our provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable recorded at amortized cost on our consolidated statements of income. For the year ended December 31, 2022, $1.3 million of our recoveries noted above related to collections from third-party collectors and $0.0 million related to sales of charged-off accounts to unrelated third parties. For the year ended December 31, 2021, $8.7 million of our recoveries noted above related to collections from third-party collectors we employ and $8.2 million related to sales of charged-off accounts to unrelated third parties. For the year ended December 31, 2020, $12.4 million of our recoveries noted above related to collections from third-party collectors we employ and $13.8 million related to sales of charged-off accounts to unrelated third parties.

We consider loan delinquencies a key indicator of credit quality because this measure provides the best ongoing estimate of how a particular class of receivables is performing. An aging of our delinquent loans, interest and fees receivable, gross (in millions) by class of receivable is as follows:

As part of ongoing collection efforts, once an account, the receivable of which is included in our CaaS segment, becomes 90 days or more past due, the related receivable is placed on a non-accrual status. Placement on a non-accrual status results in the use of programs under which the contractual interest associated with a receivable may be reduced or eliminated, or a certain amount of accrued fees is waived, provided a minimum number or amount of payments have been made. Following this adjustment, if a customer we serve demonstrates a willingness and ability to resume making monthly payments and meets certain additional criteria, the customer’s account is re-aged. When an account is re-aged, the status of the account is adjusted to bring a delinquent account current, but generally no further modifications to the payment terms or amounts owed are made. Once an account is placed on a non-accrual status, it is closed for further purchases. Accounts that are placed on a non-accrual status and thereafter make at least one payment qualify as troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”). The above referenced COVID-19 Guidance issued by federal bank regulatory agencies, in consultation with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) staff, concluded that short-term modifications (e.g., six months) made on a good faith basis to borrowers who were impacted by COVID-19 and whose accounts were less than 30 days past due as of the implementation date of a relief program are not TDRs. Although we are not a financial institution and therefore not directly subject to the COVID-19 Guidance, we believe this constitutes an interpretation of GAAP and therefore should be applied to our accounting circumstances. As a result, the below tables exclude certain accounts that are included under that guidance.

The following table details by class of receivable, the number and amount of modified loans, including TDRs that have been re-aged:

We do not separately reserve or impair these receivables outside of our general reserve process.

The Company modified 232,086, 65,125 and 60,908 accounts in the amount of $230.4 million, $70.0 million and $70.3 million during the twelve month periods ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, that qualified as TDRs. The following table details by class of receivable, the number of accounts and balance of loans that completed a modification (including those that were classified as TDRs) within the prior twelve months and subsequently defaulted.

We capitalize costs related to internal development and implementation of software used in our operating activities in accordance with applicable accounting literature. These capitalized costs consist almost exclusively of fees paid to third-party consultants to develop code and install and test software specific to our needs and to customize purchased software to maximize its benefit to us.

We record our property at cost less accumulated depreciation or amortization. We compute depreciation expense using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of our assets, which are approximately 5 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment, and 3 years for computers and software. We amortize leasehold improvements over the shorter of their estimated useful lives or the terms of their respective underlying leases.

We periodically review our property to determine if it is impaired. We incurred no impairment costs in 2022 and no impairment costs in 2021.

Prepaid expenses and other assets include amounts paid to third parties for marketing and other services as well as amounts owed to us by third parties. Prepaid amounts are expensed as the underlying related services are performed. Also included are (1) commissions paid associated with our various office leases which we amortize into expense over the lease terms, (2) ongoing deferred costs associated with service contracts and (3) investments in consumer finance technology platforms carried at cost minus impairment, if any, plus or minus changes resulting from observable price changes.

Accounts payable and accrued expenses reflect both the billed and unbilled amounts owed at the end of a period for services rendered.

Consumer loans, including past due fees reflect interest income, including finance charges, and late fees on loans in accordance with the terms of the related customer agreements. Discounts received associated with auto loans that are not included as part of our Fair Value Receivables are deferred and amortized over the average life of the related loans using the effective interest method. Premiums, discounts, annual fees and merchant fees paid or received associated with Fair Value Receivables are recognized upon receivable acquisition. Finance charges and fees, net of amounts that we consider uncollectible, are included in loans, interest and fees receivable and revenue when the fees are earned based upon the contractual terms of the loans.

Fees and related income on earning assets primarily include fees associated with credit products, including the receivables underlying the private label and general purpose credit cards we service, and our legacy credit card receivables which include the recognition of annual fee billings and cash advance fees among others.

Fees are assessed on credit card accounts underlying our credit card receivables according to the terms of the related cardholder agreements and we recognize these fees as income when they are charged to the customers’ accounts. Fees and related income on earning assets, net of amounts that we consider uncollectible, are included in loans, interest and fees receivable and revenue when the fees are earned based upon the contractual terms of the loans. The election of the fair value option to account for certain loans receivable resulted in increased fees recognized on credit products throughout the periods presented.

Other revenue includes revenues associated with interchange revenues, servicing income and ancillary product offerings (primarily associated with a credit protection program offered by our issuing bank partner). We recognize these fees as income in the period earned.

Other non-operating revenue includes revenues associated with investments in equity method investees and other revenues not associated with our ongoing business operations.

The majority of our revenue is earned from financial instruments and is not included within the scope of ASU No.2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers". We have determined that revenue from contracts with customers would primarily consist of interchange revenues in our CaaS segment and servicing revenue and other customer-related fees in both our CaaS segment and our Auto Finance segment. Interchange fees are earned when our customer's cards are used over established card networks. We earn a portion of the interchange fee the card networks charge merchants for the transaction. Servicing revenue is generated by meeting contractual performance obligations related to the collection of amounts due on receivables, and is settled with the customer net of our fee. Service charges and other customer related fees are earned from customers based on the occurrence of specific services. None of these revenue streams result in an ongoing obligation beyond what has already been rendered. Revenue from these contracts with customers is included as a component of Other revenue on our consolidated statements of income. Components (in thousands) of our revenue from contracts with customers is as follows:

Card and loan servicing costs primarily include collections and customer service expenses. Within this category of expenses are personnel, service bureau, cardholder correspondence and other direct costs associated with our collections and customer service efforts. Card and loan servicing costs also include outsourced collections and customer service expenses. We expense card and loan servicing costs as we incur them, with the exception of prepaid costs, which we expense over respective service periods.

We expense product solicitation costs, including printing, credit bureaus, list processing, telemarketing, postage, and internet marketing fees, as we incur these costs or expend resources.

In periods where we repurchased or redeemed outstanding 5.875% convertible senior notes (“convertible senior notes”), we recorded any discount or premium paid for the repurchase or redemption (including accrued interest) relative to the amortized book value of the notes. For the year ended December 31, 2021, we repurchased or redeemed $33.8 million in face amount of our convertible senior notes for $54.3 million in cash (including accrued interest). The repurchase and redemption resulted in an aggregate loss of approximately $29.4 million (including the convertible senior notes’ applicable share of deferred costs, which were written off in connection with the repurchase). Upon acquisition, the notes were retired.

In June 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2016-13, Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The guidance requires an assessment of credit losses based on expected rather than incurred losses (known as the current expected credit loss model). This generally will result in the recognition of allowances for losses earlier than under current accounting guidance for trade and other receivables, held to maturity debt securities and other instruments. The FASB has added several technical amendments (ASU 2018-19,2019-04,2019-10 and 2019-11) to clarify technical aspects of the guidance and applicability to specific financial instruments or transactions. In May 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-05, which allows entities to measure assets in the scope of ASC 326-20, except held to maturity securities, using the fair value option when they adopt the new credit impairment standard. The election can be made on an instrument by instrument basis. We adopted ASU 2016-13 beginning January 1, 2022, using the modified retrospective method of adoption. We elected the fair value option for all receivables in our CaaS segment previously measured at amortized cost. For all other receivables, we recorded an increase to our Allowances for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable using the current expected credit loss model. As a result of our adoption, we increased our Loans, interest and fees receivable (net of the related revaluation), at fair value by $315.0 million (with a corresponding decrease to Loans, interest and fees receivable, gross of $375.7 million), a decrease to our Allowances for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable of $55.6 million, a decrease to our Deferred revenue of $15.6 million, a decrease to Accounts payable and accrued expenses of $600 thousand, an increase to our deferred tax liability of $2.5 million, and an increase to our retained earnings of $8.6 million. The aforementioned impacts associated with our adoption of ASU 2016-13 primarily relate to those assets within our CaaS segment with an immaterial impact to our Auto Finance segment receivables.

In March 2020, the FASB issued ASU No.2020-04, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848), Facilitation of the Effects of Reference Rate Reform on Financial Reporting. The guidance provides an optional expedient and exceptions for applying generally accepted accounting principles to contracts, hedging relationships, and other transactions affected by reference rate reform if certain criteria are met. The ASU can be adopted no later than December 1, 2022, with early adoption permitted. In January 2021, FASB issued ASU 2021-01, Reference Rate Reform (Topic 848): Scope, which refines the scope of ASC 848 and clarifies some of its guidance as part of the FASB’s monitoring of global reference rate reform. We have not yet adopted this ASU and are evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting guidance. Based on our preliminary analysis, the London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR") impacts us in limited circumstances primarily related to our existing debt agreements and will not have a material impact upon adoption.

On March 31, 2022, the FASB issued ASU 2022-02, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Troubled Debt Restructurings and Vintage Disclosures. The ASU eliminates the accounting guidance for troubled debt restructurings by creditors while adding disclosures for certain loan restructurings by creditors when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty. This guidance requires an entity to determine whether a modification results in a new loan or a continuation of an existing loan. Additionally, the ASU requires disclosure of current period gross writeoffs by year of origination for financing receivables. The ASU is effective for the Company for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022. The disclosures required by this ASU are required for receivables held at amortized cost. As the significant majority of the Company's receivables are held at fair value, the Company does not believe the adoption of this ASU will have a material impact on its financial results or accompanying disclosures.

We operate primarily within one industry consisting of two reportable segments by which we manage our business. Our two reportable segments are: CaaS and Auto Finance.

As of both December 31, 2022and December 31, 2021, we did not have a material amount of long-lived assets located outside of the U.S.

We measure the profitability of our reportable segments based on their income after allocation of specific costs and corporate overhead; however, our segment results do not reflect any charges for internal capital allocations among our segments. Overhead costs are allocated based on headcounts and other applicable measures to better align costs with the associated revenues.

During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we repurchased and contemporaneously retired 1,674,161 shares, 434,381 shares and 245,534 shares of our common stock at an aggregate cost of $88,939,000, $25,219,000 and $3,353,000, respectively, pursuant to both open market and private purchases and the return of stock by holders of equity incentive awards to pay tax withholding obligations.

During 2021, we had 1,459,233 loaned shares of common stock outstanding, which were originally lent in connection with our November 2005 issuance of convertible senior notes. As of December 31, 2021, all loaned shares had been returned to us and subsequently retired.

In June and July 2021, we issued an aggregate of 3,188,533 shares of 7.625% Series B Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock, liquidation preference of $25.00 per share (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), for net proceeds of approximately $76.5 million after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions, but before deducting expenses and the structuring fee. We pay cumulative cash dividends on the Series B Preferred Stock, when and as declared by our Board of Directors, in the amount of $1.90625 per share each year, which is equivalent to 7.625% of the $25.00 liquidation preference per share.

During the year ending December 31, 2022, we sold 19,607 shares of our Series B Preferred Stock under our “at-the-market” offering program (the “ATM Program”) for net proceeds of $0.4 million. During the year ended December 31, 2022, we repurchased and contemporaneously retired 3,500 shares of Series B Preferred Stock at an aggregate cost of $69,000. For further information regarding the ATM Program, see Note 15 “ATM Program.”

On November 26, 2014, we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Dove Ventures, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company (“Dove”). The agreement provided for a senior secured term loan facility in an amount of up to $40.0 million at any time outstanding. On December 27, 2019, the Company issued 400,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock with an aggregate initial liquidation preference of $40.0 million, in exchange for full satisfaction of the $40.0 million that the Company owed Dove under the Loan and Security Agreement. Dividends on the preferred stock are 6% per annum (cumulative, noncompounding) and are payable as declared, and in preference to any common stock dividends, in cash. The Series A Preferred Stock is perpetual and has no maturity date. The Company may, at its option, redeem the shares of Series A Preferred Stock on or after January 1, 2025 at a redemption price equal to $100 per share, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends. At the request of holders of a majority of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, the Company shall offer to redeem all of the Series A Preferred Stock at a redemption price equal to $100 per share, plus any accumulated and unpaid dividends, at the option of the holders thereof, on or after January 1, 2024. Upon the election by the holders of a majority of the shares of Series A Preferred Stock, each share of the Series A Preferred Stock is convertible into the number of shares of the Company’s common stock as is determined by dividing (i) the sum of (a) $100 and (b) any accumulated and unpaid dividends on such share by (ii) an initial conversion price equal to $10 per share, subject to certain adjustment in certain circumstances to prevent dilution. Given the redemption rights contained within the Series A Preferred Stock, we account for the outstanding preferred stock as temporary equity in the consolidated balance sheets. Dividends paid on the Series A Preferred Stock are deducted from Net income attributable to controlling interests to derive Net income attributable to common shareholders. The common stock issuable upon conversion of Series A Preferred Stock is included in our calculation of Net income attributable to common shareholders per share—diluted. See Note 13, “Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests Per Common Share” for more information.

Dove is a limited liability company owned by three trusts. David G. Hanna is the sole shareholder and the President of the corporation that serves as the sole trustee of one of the trusts, and David G. Hanna and members of his immediate family are the beneficiaries of this trust. Frank J. Hanna, III is the sole shareholder and the President of the corporation that serves as the sole trustee of the other two trusts, and Frank J. Hanna, III and members of his immediate family are the beneficiaries of these other two trusts.

On November 14, 2019, a wholly-owned subsidiary issued 50.5 million Class B preferred units at a purchase price of $1.00 per unit to an unrelated third party. The units carry a 16% preferred return to be paid quarterly, with up to 6 percentage points of the preferred return to be paid through the issuance of additional units or cash, at our election. The units have both call and put rights and are also subject to various covenants including a minimum book value, which if not satisfied, could allow for the securities to be put back to the subsidiary. A holder of the Class B Preferred Units may, at its election, require the Company to redeem part or all of such holder’s Class B Preferred Units for cash on October 14, 2024. In March 2020, the subsidiary issued an additional 50.0 million Class B preferred units under the same terms. The proceeds from the transaction are being used for general corporate purposes. We have included the issuance of these Class B preferred units as temporary noncontrolling interest on the consolidated balance sheets. Dividends paid on the Class B preferred units are deducted from Net income attributable to controlling interests to derive Net income attributable to common shareholders. See Note 13, “Net Income Attributable to Controlling Interests Per Common Share” for more information.

As previously discussed, we adopted ASU 2016-13, electing the fair value option for all remaining loans receivable associated with our private label credit and general purpose credit card platform previously measured at amortized cost. We estimate the fair value of these receivables using a discounted cash flow model, and reevaluate the fair value of our Fair Value Receivables at the end of each quarter. Additionally, we may adjust our models to reflect macroeconomic events. With the aforementioned market impacts of COVID-19 and related economic impacts, we continue to include market degradation in our models to reflect the possibility of delinquency rates increasing in the near term (and the corresponding increase in charge-offs and decrease in payments) above the level that historical and current trends would suggest.

We update our fair value analysis each quarter, with changes since the prior reporting period reflected as a component of "Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value" in the consolidated statements of income. Changes in interest rates, credit spreads, discount rates, realized and projected credit losses and cash flow timing will lead to changes in the fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value and therefore impact earnings.

For all of our other receivables, we have not elected the fair value option. Nevertheless, pursuant to applicable requirements, we include disclosures of the fair value of these other receivables to the extent practicable within the disclosures below. Additionally, we have other liabilities, associated with consolidated legacy credit card securitization trusts, that we are required to carry at fair value in our consolidated financial statements, and they also are addressed within the disclosures below.

Where applicable as noted above, we account for our financial assets and liabilities at fair value based upon a three-tiered valuation system. In general, fair values determined by Level 1 inputs use quoted prices (unadjusted) in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that we have the ability to access. Fair values determined by Level 2 inputs use inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, and inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability, such as interest rates and yield curves that are observable at commonly quoted intervals. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability, and include situations where there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability. Where inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy, the level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement in its entirety has been determined is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety.

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the asset or liability. The table below summarizes (in thousands) by fair value hierarchy the December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 fair values and carrying amounts of (1) our assets that are required to be carried at fair value in our consolidated financial statements and (2) our assets not carried at fair value, but for which fair value disclosures are required:

For those asset classes above that are required to be carried at fair value in our consolidated financial statements, gains and losses associated with fair value changes are detailed on our consolidated statements of income as a component of "Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value". For our loans, interest and fees receivable included in the above table, we assess the fair value of these assets based on our estimate of future cash flows net of servicing costs, and to the extent that such cash flow estimates change from period to period, any such changes are considered to be attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk.

For Level 3 assets carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs, the following table presents (in thousands) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the years ended December 31,2022,2021 and 2020:

The unrealized gains and losses for assets within the Level 3 category presented in the tables above include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs.

Net Revaluation of Loans, Interest and Fees Receivable. We record the net revaluation of loans, interest and fees receivable (including those pledged as collateral) in the Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value category in our consolidated statements of income. The net revaluation of loans, interest and fees receivable is based on the present value of future cash flows using a valuation model of expected cash flows and the estimated cost to service and collect those cash flows. We estimate the present value of these future cash flows using internally-developed estimates of assumptions third-party market participants would use in determining fair value, including estimates of net collected yield, principal payment rates, expected principal credit loss rates, costs of funds, discount rates and servicing costs. Interest income on receivables underlying our asset classes that are carried at fair value in our consolidated financial statements is recorded in Revenue - Consumer loans, including past due fees in our consolidated statements of income.

For Level 3 assets carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs, the following table presents (in thousands) quantitative information about the valuation techniques and the inputs used in the fair value measurement as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020. As discussed above, our fair value models include market degradation to reflect the possibility of delinquency rates increasing in the near term (and the corresponding increase in charge-offs and decrease in payments) above the level that historical and current trends would suggest. This market degradation is included in the below quantitative information:

Our assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment and considers factors specific to the liability. The table below summarizes (in thousands) by fair value hierarchy the December 31, 2022 and 2021 fair values and carrying amounts of (1) our liabilities that are required to be carried at fair value in our consolidated financial statements and (2) our liabilities not carried at fair value, but for which fair value disclosures are required:

For our notes payable where market prices are not available, we assess the fair value of these liabilities based on our estimate of future cash flows generated from their underlying credit card receivables collateral, net of servicing compensation required under the note facilities, and to the extent that such cash flow estimates change from period to period, any such changes are considered to be attributable to changes in instrument-specific credit risk. Gains and losses associated with fair value changes for our notes payable associated with structured financing liabilities that are carried at fair value are detailed on our consolidated statements of income as a component of "Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value". We have evaluated the fair value of our third party debt by analyzing the expected repayment terms and credit spreads included in our recent financing arrangements obtained with similar terms. These recent financing arrangements provide positive evidence that the underlying data used in our assessment of fair value has not changed relative to the general market and therefore the fair value of our debt continues to be the same as the carrying value. See Note 10, “Notes Payable,” for further discussion on our other notes payable.

For our material Level 3 liabilities carried at fair value measured on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs, the following table presents (in thousands) a reconciliation of the beginning and ending balances for the year ended December 31, 2021 (no amounts were outstanding as of December 31, 2022):

The unrealized gains and losses for liabilities within the Level 3 category presented in the table above include changes in fair value that are attributable to both observable and unobservable inputs. We provide below a brief description of the valuation techniques used for Level 3 liabilities.

Net Revaluation of Notes Payable Associated with Structured Financings, at Fair Value. We record the net revaluations of notes payable associated with structured financings, at fair value, in the Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value on our consolidated statements of income. The legal entity associated with the securitization transaction is consolidated as a VIE as the Company is deemed the primary beneficiary of the entity. The Company is not liable for the full face value of the liability in the VIE so it is carried at fair value based upon amounts the borrower will receive from the legal entity. The net revaluation of these notes is based on the present value of future cash flows utilized in repayment of the outstanding principal and interest under the facilities using a valuation model of expected cash flows net of the contractual service expenses within the facilities. We estimate the present value of these future cash flows using internally-developed estimates of assumptions third-party market participants would use in determining fair value, including: estimates of gross yield, payment rates, expected credit loss rates, servicing costs, and discount rates on the credit card receivables that secure the non-recourse notes payable; costs of funds; discount rates; and contractual servicing fees. Accrued interest expense on notes payable underlying our notes payable associated with structured financings, at fair value is recorded in Interest expense in our consolidated statements of income.

Other relevant data (in thousands) as of December 31, 2022and December 31, 2021 concerning certain assets and liabilities we carry at fair value are as follows:

Details (in thousands) of our property on our consolidated balance sheets are as follows:

Depreciation expense totaled $2.2 million and $1.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021, respectively.

The Company contributes the vast majority of receivables to VIEs. These entities are sometimes established to facilitate third party financing. When assets are contributed to a VIE, they serve as collateral for the debt securities issued by that VIE. The evaluation of whether the entity qualifies as a VIE is based upon the sufficiency of the equity at risk in the legal entity. This evaluation is generally a function of the level of excess collateral in the legal entity. We consolidate VIEs when we hold a variable interest and we retain significant exposure to certain receivables and therefore, are the primary beneficiary. Through our role as servicer, we are the primary beneficiary when we have the power to direct activities that most significantly affect the economic performance and have the obligation to absorb the majority of the losses or benefits. In all of our VIEs, we continue to service the receivables (in accordance with defined servicing procedures), and as such, have the ability to significantly impact the economic performance of those VIEs. In certain circumstances we guarantee the performance of the underlying debt or agree to contribute additional collateral when necessary. When collateral is pledged, it is not available for the general use of the Company and can only be used to satisfy the related debt obligation. The results of operations and financial position of consolidated VIEs are included in our consolidated financial statements.

The following table presents a summary of VIEs in which we had continuing involvement and held a variable interest (in millions):

We have operating leases primarily associated with our corporate offices and regional service centers as well as for certain equipment. Our leases have remaining lease terms of 1 to 12 years, some of which include options, at our discretion, to extend the leases for additional periods generally on one-year revolving periods. Other leases allow for us to terminate the lease based on appropriate notification periods. For certain of our leased offices, we sublease a portion of the unoccupied space. The terms of the sublease arrangement generally coincide with the underlying lease. The components of lease expense associated with our lease liabilities and supplemental cash flow information related to those leases were as follows (dollar amounts in thousands):

As of December 31, 2022, maturities of lease liabilities were as follows (in thousands):

In August 2021, we entered into an operating lease agreement for our corporate headquarters in Atlanta, Georgia with an unaffiliated third party. The new lease covers approximately 73,000 square feet and commenced in June 2022 for a 146 month term. The total commitment under the new lease is approximately $27.8 million and is included in the table above. In connection with the commencement of this new lease, we discontinued most of the subleasing arrangements with third parties for space at our corporate headquarters. A right-of-use asset and liability was recorded at the commencement date of the lease.

In addition, we occasionally lease certain equipment under cancelable and non-cancelable leases, which are accounted for as capital leases in our consolidated financial statements. As of December 31, 2022, we had no material non-cancelable capital leases with initial or remaining terms of more than one year.

Other notes payable outstanding as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021 that are secured by the financial and operating assets of either the borrower, another of our subsidiaries or both, include the following, scheduled (in millions); except as otherwise noted, the assets of our holding company (Atlanticus Holdings Corporation) are subject to creditor claims under these scheduled facilities:

In October 2015, we (through a wholly owned subsidiary) entered a revolving credit facility with a (as subsequently amended) $50.0 million revolving borrowing limit that can be drawn to the extent of outstanding eligible principal receivables (of which $50.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2022). This facility is secured by the loans, interest and fees receivable and related restricted cash and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("SOFR") plus 3.0%. The facility matures on October 30, 2024 and is subject to certain affirmative covenants, including a liquidity test and an eligibility test, the failure of which could result in required early repayment of all or a portion of the outstanding balance. The facility is guaranteed by Atlanticus, which is required to maintain certain minimum liquidity levels.

In October 2016, we (through a wholly owned subsidiary) entered a revolving credit facility available to the extent of outstanding eligible principal receivables of our CAR subsidiary (of which $44.1 million was drawn as of December 31, 2022). This facility is secured by the financial and operating assets of CAR and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus a range between 2.4% and 3.0% based on certain ratios. The loan is subject to certain affirmative covenants, including a coverage ratio, a leverage ratio and a collateral performance test, the failure of which could result in required early repayment of all or a portion of the outstanding balance. In periods subsequent to October 2016, we amended the original agreement to either extend the maturity date and/or expand the capacity of this revolving credit facility. As of December 31, 2022, the facility's borrowing limit was $55.0 million and the facility matures on November 1, 2024. There were no other material changes to the existing terms or conditions as a result of these amendments and the new maturity date and borrowing limit are reflected in the table above. In January 2023, the note was amended to change the underlying reference rate from LIBOR to SOFR, the facility size was increased to $65.0 million and the maturity date was extended to November 1, 2025. All other terms remained materially consistent with the amended facility.

In 2018, we (through a wholly owned subsidiary) entered into a revolving credit facility to sell up to an aggregate $100.0 million of notes that are secured by the receivables and other assets of the trust (of which $0.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022) that can be drawn upon to the extent of outstanding eligible receivables. The interest rate on the notes equals the SOFR plus 3.1%. The facility matures on March 15, 2024, and is subject to certain affirmative covenants and collateral performance tests, the failure of which could result in required early repayment of all or a portion of the outstanding balance of notes. As of December 31, 2022, the aggregate borrowing limit was $100.0 million.

In December 2017, we (through a wholly owned subsidiary) entered a revolving credit facility with a (as subsequently amended) $25.0 million revolving borrowing limit that is available to the extent of outstanding eligible principal receivables (of which $24.6 million was drawn as of December 31, 2022). This facility is secured by the loans, interest and fees receivable and related restricted cash and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to SOFR plus 3.6%. The facility matures on April 21, 2023 and is subject to certain affirmative covenants, including payment, delinquency and charge-off tests, the failure of which could result in required early repayment of all or a portion of the outstanding balance. The note is guaranteed by Atlanticus.

In June 2019, we (through a wholly owned subsidiary) entered a revolving credit facility with a (as subsequently amended) $20.0 million revolving borrowing limit that is available to the extent of outstanding eligible principal receivables (of which $11.1 million was drawn as of December 31, 2022). This facility is secured by the loans, interest and fees receivable and related restricted cash and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to the Prime Rate. The note is guaranteed by Atlanticus.

In August 2019, we issued a $17.4 million term note, which bears interest at a fixed rate of 8.0% and is due in August 2024.

In November 2019, we sold $200.0 million of ABS secured by certain credit card receivables (expiring May 15, 2024). A portion of the proceeds from the sale was used to pay down our existing facilities associated with our credit card receivables and the remaining proceeds were used to fund the acquisition of future receivables. The terms of the ABS allow for a three-year revolving structure with a subsequent 12-month to 18-month amortization period. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 4.91%. This facility is currently in contractual scheduled amortization.

In July 2020, we sold $100.0 million of ABS secured by certain private label credit receivables. A portion of the proceeds from the sale were used to pay down some of our existing revolving facilities associated with our private label credit receivables, and the remaining proceeds were used to fund the acquisition of receivables. The terms of the ABS allow for a three-year revolving structure with a subsequent 18-month amortization period. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 5.47%.

In October 2020, we sold $250.0 million of ABS secured by certain private label credit receivables. A portion of the proceeds from the sale was used to pay down our existing term ABS associated with our private label credit receivables, noted above, and the remaining proceeds were used to fund the acquisition of receivables. The terms of the ABS allow for a 41-month revolving structure with an 18-month amortization period, and the securities mature between August 2025 and October 2025. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 4.1%.

In January 2021, we (through a wholly owned subsidiary) entered a revolving credit facility with a (as subsequently amended) $25.0 million borrowing limit (of which $25.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2022) that is available to the extent of outstanding eligible principal receivables. This facility is secured by the loans, interest and fees receivable and related restricted cash and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to the greater of the Prime Rate or 4%. The facility matures on June 16, 2025 and is subject to certain affirmative covenants, including a liquidity test and an eligibility test, the failure of which could result in required early repayment of all or a portion of the outstanding balance. The note is guaranteed by Atlanticus, which is required to maintain certain minimum liquidity levels.

In June 2021, we sold $300.0 million of ABS secured by certain credit card receivables (expiring May 15, 2026 through December 15, 2026). The terms of the ABS allow for a four-year revolving structure with a subsequent 11-month to 18-month amortization period. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 4.24%.

In September 2021, we entered a term facility with a $75.0 million limit (of which $0.0 million was outstanding of December 31, 2022) that is available to the extent of outstanding eligible principal receivables. This facility is secured by the loans, interest and fees receivable and related restricted cash and accrues interest at an annual rate equal to LIBOR plus 2.75%. The terms of the facility allow for a 24-month revolving structure with an 18-month amortization period and the facility matures in March 2025.

In November 2021, we sold $300.0 million of ABS secured by certain credit card receivables (expiring May 15, 2026). The terms of the ABS allow for a three-year revolving structure with a subsequent 18-month amortization period. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 3.53%.

In May 2022, we entered a $250.0 million ABS agreement (of which $250.0 million was drawn as of December 31, 2022) secured by certain credit card receivables (expiring May 15, 2030). The terms of the ABS allow for a five-year revolving structure with a subsequent 18-month amortization period. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 6.33%.

In August 2022, we entered a $100.0 million ABS agreement secured by certain credit card receivables (of which $0.0 million was outstanding as of December 31, 2022) that can be drawn upon to the extent of outstanding eligible receivables. The interest rate on the notes is based on the Term Secured Overnight Financing Rate ("Term SOFR") plus 1.8%. The facility matures on August 5, 2024.

In September 2022, we sold $100.0 million of ABS secured by certain private label credit receivables. A portion of the proceeds from the sale was used to pay down other revolving facilities associated with our private label credit receivables, noted above, and the remaining proceeds have been invested in the acquisition of receivables. The terms of the ABS allow for a 3-year revolving structure with an 18-month amortization period. The weighted average interest rate on the securities is fixed at 7.3%.

As of December 31, 2022, we were in compliance with the covenants underlying our various notes payable and credit facilities.

In November 2021, we issued $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of senior notes (included on our consolidated balance sheet as "Senior notes, net"). The senior notes are general unsecured obligations of the Company and rank equally in right of payment with all of the Company’s existing and future senior unsecured and unsubordinated indebtedness, and will rank senior in right of payment to the Company’s future subordinated indebtedness, if any. The senior notes are effectively subordinated to all of the Company’s existing and future secured indebtedness, to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness, and the senior notes are structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities (including trade payables) of the Company’s subsidiaries (excluding any amounts owed by such subsidiaries to the Company). The senior notes bear interest at the rate of 6.125% per annum. Interest on the senior notes is payable quarterly in arrears on February 1, May 1, August 1 and November 1 of each year. The senior notes will mature on November 30, 2026. We are amortizing fees associated with the issuance of the senior notes into interest expense over the expected life of the notes. Amortization of these fees for the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021 totaled $1.4 million and $0.1 million, respectively.

Under finance products available in the private label credit and general purpose credit card channels, consumers have the ability to borrow up to the maximum credit limit assigned to each individual’s account. Unfunded commitments under these products aggregated $2.2 billion at December 31, 2022. We have never experienced a situation in which all borrowers have exercised their entire available lines of credit at any given point in time, nor do we anticipate this will ever occur in the future. Moreover, there would be a concurrent increase in assets should there be any exercise of these lines of credit.

Additionally, our CAR operations provide floor-plan financing for a pre-qualified network of independent automotive dealers and automotive finance companies in the buy-here, pay-here used car business. The floor plan financing allows dealers and finance companies to borrow up to the maximum pre-approved credit limit allowed in order to finance ongoing inventory needs. These loans are secured by the underlying auto inventory and, in certain cases where we have other lending products outstanding with the dealer, are secured by the collateral under those lending arrangements as well, including any outstanding dealer reserves. As of December 31, 2022, CAR had unfunded outstanding floor-plan financing commitments totaling $11.4 million. Each draw against unused commitments is reviewed for conformity to pre-established guidelines.

Under agreements with third-party originating and other financial institutions, we have pledged security (collateral) related to their issuance of consumer credit and purchases thereunder, of which $20.6 million remains pledged as of December 31, 2022 to support various ongoing contractual obligations.

Under agreements with third-party originating and other financial institutions, we have agreed to indemnify the financial institutions for certain liabilities associated with the services we provide on behalf of the financial institutions—such indemnification obligations generally being limited to instances in which we either (a) have been afforded the opportunity to defend against any potentially indemnifiable claims or (b) have reached agreement with the financial institutions regarding settlement of potentially indemnifiable claims. As of December 31, 2022, we have assessed the likelihood of any potential payments related to the aforementioned contingencies as remote. We would accrue liabilities related to these contingencies in any future period if and in which we assess the likelihood of an estimable payment as probable.

Under the account terms, consumers have the option of enrolling in a credit protection program with our issuing bank partner which would make the minimum payments owed on their accounts for a period of up to six months upon the occurrence of an eligible event. Eligible events typically include loss of life, job loss, disability, or hospitalization. As an acquirer of receivables, our potential exposure under this program, if all eligible participants applied for this benefit, was $69.4 million as of December 31, 2022. We have never experienced a situation in which all eligible participants have applied for this benefit at any given point in time, nor do we anticipate this will ever occur in the future. We include our estimate of future claims under this program within our fair value analysis of the associated receivables.

We also are subject to certain minimum payments under cancelable and non-cancelable lease arrangements. For further information regarding these commitments, see Note 9, “Leases”.

We are involved in various legal proceedings that are incidental to the conduct of our business. There are currently no pending legal proceedings that are expected to be material to us. Included in the first quarter of 2022 is an $8.5 million expense related to a settlement of outstanding litigation associated with our Auto Finance segment.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities reflect the effects of tax losses, credits, and the future income tax effects of temporary differences between the consolidated financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and are measured using enacted tax rates that apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The current and deferred portions (in thousands) of our federal, foreign, and state and other income tax expenses or benefits are as follows:

We experienced an effective income tax expense rate of 9.8% and 19.0% for the years ended December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, respectively. Our effective income tax expense rates for these years are below the statutory rate principally due to (1) deductions associated with the exercise of stock options and the vesting of restricted stock at times when the fair value of our stock exceeded such share-based awards’ grant date values—such deductions being significantly higher in 2022 than in 2021 given stock option exercises in 2022 by the Executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, such options being grandfathered from executive compensation deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”) and (2) our deduction for income tax purposes of amounts characterized in our consolidated financial statements as dividends on a preferred stock issuance, such amounts constituting deductible interest expense on a debt issuance for tax purposes. Offsetting the above factors are the effects on our effective tax rate of state and foreign income tax expense, taxes on global intangible low-taxed income, and executive compensation deduction limitations under Section 162(m) of the Code. Further details related to the above are reflected in the table below reconciling our effective income tax expense rate to the statutory rate.

We report income tax-related interest and penalties (including those associated with both our accrued liabilities for uncertain tax positions and unpaid tax liabilities) within our income tax line item on our consolidated statements of income. We likewise report the reversal of income tax-related interest and penalties within such line item to the extent we resolve our liabilities for uncertain tax positions or unpaid tax liabilities in a manner favorable to our accruals therefor. For 2022 and 2021, we experienced only de minimis interest expense and reversals within our income tax line item.

The following table reconciles our effective income tax expense rate to the statutory rate for 2022 and 2021:

As of December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, the respective significant components (in thousands) of our deferred tax assets and liabilities (which are included as a component of our Income tax liability on our consolidated balance sheets) were:

We undertook a detailed review of our deferred taxes and determined that a valuation allowance was required for certain deferred tax assets in state tax jurisdictions within the U.S. and in the U.K. We reduce our deferred tax assets by valuation allowances if it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which temporary differences are deductible. In making our valuation allowance determinations, we consider all available positive and negative evidence affecting specific deferred tax assets, including our past and anticipated future performance, the reversal of deferred tax liabilities, the length of carry-back and carry-forward periods, and the implementation of tax planning strategies. Because our valuation allowance evaluations require consideration of future events, significant judgment is required in making the evaluations, and our conclusions could be materially different if our expectations are not met. Our valuation allowances totaled $20.7 million and $22.7 million as of December 31, 2022, and December 31, 2021, respectively.

Certain of our deferred tax assets relate to federal, foreign, and state net operating losses, and we have no other net operating losses, capital losses, or credit carryforwards other than those noted herein. We have recorded a federal deferred tax asset of $22.6 million (based on indefinite-lived federal net operating loss carryforwards of $104.0 million). We have recorded state deferred tax assets of $28.6 million based on state net operating loss carryforwards, some of which are indefinite-lived and some which expire in various years beginning in 2023.

Our subsidiaries file federal, foreign, and/or state and other income tax returns. In the normal course of our business, we are subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world, including such major jurisdictions as the U.S., the U.K., and various U.S. states and territories. With a few exceptions of a non-material nature, we are no longer subject to federal, state, local, or foreign income tax examinations for years prior to 2018.

Reconciliations (in thousands) of our unrecognized tax benefits from the beginning to the end of 2022 and 2021, respectively, are as follows:

Our unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized, would affect the effective tax rate are not material at only $0.9 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively.

We compute net income attributable to controlling interests per common share by dividing net income attributable to controlling interests by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock (including participating securities) outstanding during the period, as discussed below. Diluted computations applicable in financial reporting periods in which we report income reflect the potential dilution to the basic income per share of common stock computations that could occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised, were converted into common stock or were to result in the issuance of common stock that would share in our results of operations. In performing our net income attributable to controlling interests per share of common stock computations, we apply accounting rules that require us to include all unvested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, in the number of shares outstanding in our basic and diluted calculations. Common stock and certain unvested share-based payment awards earn dividends equally, and we have included all outstanding restricted stock awards in our basic and diluted calculations for current and prior periods.

The following table sets forth the computations of net income attributable to controlling interests per share of common stock (in thousands, except per share data):

As their effects were anti-dilutive, we excluded stock options to purchase 0.1 million shares from our net income attributable to controlling interests per share of common stock calculations for the year ended December 31, 2022. No shares were excluded from our net income attributable to controlling interests per share of common stock calculations for the year ended December 31, 2021. We excluded stock options to purchase 0.1 million shares from our net income attributable to controlling interests per share of common stock calculations for the year ended December 31, 2020.

For the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we included 4.0 million, 4.0 million and 3.8 million shares of common stock for each period in our outstanding diluted share counts associated with our Series A Preferred Stock. See Note 5, "Redeemable Preferred Stock", for a further discussion of these convertible securities.

For the year ended December 31, 2021, we included 0.1 million shares of common stock in the diluted net income attributable to controlling interests per share of common stock calculations associated with our convertible senior notes.

We currently have two stock-based compensation plans, the Second Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the “ESPP”) and the Fourth Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “Fourth Amended 2014 Plan”). Our Fourth Amended 2014 Plan provides that we may grant options on or shares of our common stock (and other types of equity awards) to members of our Board of Directors, employees, consultants and advisors. The Fourth Amended 2014 Plan was approved by our shareholders in May 2019. As of December 31, 2022, 51,041 shares remained available for issuance under the ESPP and 2,085,158 shares remained available for issuance under the Fourth Amended 2014 Plan.

Exercises and vestings under our stock-based compensation plans resulted in no income tax-related charges to paid-in capital during the years ended December 31, 2022 and 2021.

During the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we granted 105,360 shares, 49,988 shares and 61,373 shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units (net of any forfeitures), respectively, with aggregate grant date fair values of $4.9 million, $1.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. We incurred expenses of $2.6 million, $1.2 million and $0.8 million during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively, related to restricted stock awards. When we grant restricted stock and restricted stock units, we defer the grant date value of the restricted stock and restricted stock unit and amortize that value (net of the value of anticipated forfeitures) as compensation expense with an offsetting entry to the paid-in capital component of our consolidated shareholders’ equity. Our restricted stock awards typically vest over a range of 12 to 60 months (or other term as specified in the grant which may include the achievement of performance measures) and are amortized to salaries and benefits expense ratably over applicable vesting periods. As of December 31, 2022, our unamortized deferred compensation costs associated with non-vested restricted stock awards were $3.3 million with a weighted-average remaining amortization period of 2.8 years. No forfeitures have been included in our compensation cost estimates based on historical forfeiture rates.

The exercise price per share of the options awarded under the Fourth Amended 2014 Plan must be equal to or greater than the market price on the date the option is granted. The option period may not exceed 10 years from the date of grant. We had expense of $1.6 million, $2.0 million and $0.5 million related to stock option-related compensation costs during the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, respectively. When applicable, we recognize stock option-related compensation expense for any awards with graded vesting on a straight-line basis over the vesting period for the entire award. The table below includes additional information about outstanding options:

Information on stock options granted, exercised and vested is as follows (in thousands, except per share data):

Options issued during the years ended December 31, 2021 and 2020 had aggregate grant-date fair values of $3.1 million and $1.4 million, respectively. No options were issued during the year ended December 31, 2022. We had $0.8 million and $2.4 million of unamortized deferred compensation costs associated with non-vested stock options as of December 31, 2022 and December 31, 2021, respectively, with a weighted average remaining amortization period of 1.1 years as of December 31, 2022. Upon exercise of outstanding options, the Company issues new shares.

On August 10, 2022, the Company entered into an At Market Issuance Sales Agreement (the “Sales Agreement”) providing for the sale by the Company of up to an aggregate offering price of $100,000,000 of our (i) Series B Preferred Stock and (ii) senior notes, from time to time through a sales agent, in connection with the ATM Program. Sales pursuant to the Sales Agreement, if any, may be made in transactions that are deemed to be “at-the-market offerings” as defined in Rule 415 under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, including sales made directly on or through the NASDAQ Global Select Market. The sales agent will make all sales using commercially reasonable efforts consistent with its normal trading and sales practices up to the amount specified in, and otherwise in accordance with the terms of, the placement notice.

For further information regarding the ATM Program, see Note 4, “Shareholders’ Equity and Preferred Stock.”

We maintain a defined contribution retirement plan (“401(k) plan”) for our U.S. employees that provides for a matching contribution by us. All full time U.S. employees are eligible to participate in the 401(k) plan. We made matching contributions of $341,245, $274,759 and $197,214 for the years ended December 31, 2022,2021 and 2020, respectively.

Also, all employees, excluding executive officers, are eligible to participate in the ESPP. Under the ESPP, employees can elect to have up to 10% of their annual wages withheld to purchase our common stock up to a fair market value of $10,000. The amounts deducted and accumulated by each participant are used to purchase shares of common stock on or as promptly as practicable after the last business day of each month. The price of stock purchased under the ESPP is approximately 85% of the fair market value per share of our common stock on the purchase date. Employees contributed $107,995 to purchase 3,280 shares of common stock in 2022, $79,095 to purchase 2,241 shares of common stock in 2021 and $106,775 to purchase 9,209 shares of common stock in 2020 under the ESPP. The ESPP covers up to 100,000 shares of common stock. Our charge to expense associated with the ESPP was $35,348, $28,937 and $31,748 in 2022,2021, and 2020 respectively.

Under a shareholders’ agreement which we entered into with certain shareholders, including David G. Hanna, Frank J. Hanna, III and certain trusts that were Hanna affiliates, following our initial public offering (1) if one or more of the shareholders accepts a bona fide offer from a third party to purchase more than 50% of the outstanding common stock, each of the other shareholders that is a party to the agreement may elect to sell his shares to the purchaser on the same terms and conditions, and (2) if shareholders that are a party to the agreement owning more than 50% of the common stock propose to transfer all of their shares to a third party, then such transferring shareholders may require the other shareholders that are a party to the agreement to sell all of the shares owned by them to the proposed transferee on the same terms and conditions.

In June 2007, we entered into a sublease for 1,000 square feet (as later adjusted to 3,100 square feet) of excess office space at our Atlanta headquarters with HBR Capital, Ltd. (“HBR”), a company co-owned by David G. Hanna and his brother Frank J. Hanna, III. The sublease rate per square foot is the same as the rate that we pay under the prime lease. Under the sublease, HBR paid us $62,422, $17,299 and $16,960 for 2022,2021 and 2020, respectively. The aggregate amount of payments required under the sublease from January 1, 2023 to the expiration of the sublease in May 2023 is $39,400.

In January 2013, HBR began leasing the services of four employees from us. HBR reimburses us for the full cost of the employees, based on the amount of time devoted to HBR. In the years ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020, we received $404,302, $380,733 and $334,526, respectively, of reimbursed costs from HBR associated with these leased employees.

On November 26, 2014, we and certain of our subsidiaries entered into a Loan and Security Agreement with Dove. The agreement provided for a senior secured term loan facility in an amount of up to $40.0 million at any time outstanding. On December 27, 2019, the Company issued 400,000 shares of its Series A Preferred Stock with an aggregate initial liquidation preference of $40.0 million, in exchange for full satisfaction of the $40.0 million that the Company owed Dove under the Loan and Security Agreement. Dove is a limited liability company owned by three trusts. David G. Hanna is the sole shareholder and the President of the corporation that serves as the sole trustee of one of the trusts, and David G. Hanna and members of his immediate family are the beneficiaries of this trust. Frank J. Hanna, III is the sole shareholder and the President of the corporation that serves as the sole trustee of the other two trusts, and Frank J. Hanna, III and members of his immediate family are the beneficiaries of these other two trusts. See Note 5 "Redeemable Preferred Stock" for more information.

During 2022, the Company utilized Axiom Bank, NA to provide legal and other services related to various commercial opportunities. David G. Hanna, Frank J. Hanna, III and members of their immediate families, control and own Axiom Bancshares, Inc., which is the bank holding company for Axiom Bank, NA. The aggregate amount of payments made to Axiom Bank during 2022 was $1.0 million.

We evaluate subsequent events that occur after our consolidated balance sheet date but before our consolidated financial statements are issued. There are two types of subsequent events: (1) recognized, or those that provide additional evidence with respect to conditions that existed at the date of the balance sheet, including the estimates inherent in the process of preparing financial statements; and (2) nonrecognized, or those that provide evidence with respect to conditions that did not exist at the date of the balance sheet but arose subsequent to that date.

We have evaluated subsequent events occurring after December 31, 2022, and based on our evaluation we did not identify any recognized or nonrecognized subsequent events that would have required further adjustments to our consolidated financial statements other than the developments described below.

We purchased 16,313 shares of common stock through February 28, 2023, which were subsequently retired.

		Page
PART I
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	1
PART II
Item 8.	Financial Statements and Supplementary Data	16
Item 9A.	Controls and Procedures	16
PART IV
Item 15.	Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules	17
	Signatures	20

	●	receivables not originated in compliance with law (or revised interpretations) could become unenforceable and uncollectible under their terms against the obligors;
	●	we may be required to credit or refund previously collected amounts;
	●	certain fees and finance charges could be limited, prohibited or restricted, reducing the profitability of certain investments in receivables;
	●	certain collection methods could be prohibited, forcing us to revise our practices or adopt more costly or less effective practices;
	●	limitations on our ability to recover on charged-off receivables regardless of any act or omission on our part;
	●	some credit products and services could be banned in certain states or at the federal level;
	●	federal or state bankruptcy or debtor relief laws could offer additional protections to consumers seeking bankruptcy protection, providing a court greater leeway to reduce or discharge amounts owed to us; and
	●	a reduction in our ability or willingness to invest in receivables arising under loans to certain consumers, such as military personnel.

	●	increased cyber and payment fraud risk related to COVID-19, as cybercriminals attempt to profit from the disruption, given increased e-commerce and other online activity;
	●	challenges to the security, availability and reliability of our information technology platform due to changes to normal operations, including the possibility of one or more clusters of COVID-19 cases affecting our employees or affecting the systems or employees of our partners; and
	●	an increased volume of borrower and regulatory requests for information and support, or new regulatory requirements, which could require additional resources and costs to address.

	●	actual or anticipated fluctuations in our operating results;
	●	changes in expectations as to our future financial performance, including financial estimates and projections by Atlanticus, securities analysts and investors;
	●	the overall financing environment, which is critical to our value;
	●	changes in interest rates;
	●	inflation and supply chain disruptions;
	●	the operating and stock performance of our competitors;
	●	announcements by us or our competitors of new products or services or significant contracts, acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments;
	●	the announcement of enforcement actions or investigations against us or our competitors or other negative publicity relating to us or our industry;
	●	changes in GAAP, laws, regulations or the interpretations thereof that affect our various business activities and segments;
	●	general domestic or international economic, market and political conditions;
	●	changes in ownership by executive officers, directors and parties related to them who control a majority of our common stock;
	●	additions or departures of key personnel;
	●	the annual yield from distributions on the Series B Preferred Stock as compared to yields on other financial instruments; and
	●	global pandemics (such as the COVID-19 pandemic).

	●	issue debt securities or otherwise incur additional indebtedness or other obligations, including (1) any indebtedness or other obligations that would be equal in right of payment to the Senior Notes, (2) any indebtedness or other obligations that would be secured and therefore rank effectively senior in right of payment to the Senior Notes to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness or other obligations, (3) indebtedness of ours that is guaranteed by one or more of our subsidiaries and which therefore would be structurally senior to the Senior Notes and (4) securities, indebtedness or obligations issued or incurred by our subsidiaries that would be senior to our equity interests in our subsidiaries and therefore rank structurally senior to the Senior Notes with respect to the assets of our subsidiaries;
	●	pay dividends on, or purchase or redeem or make any payments in respect of, capital stock or other securities subordinated in right of payment to the Senior Notes;
	●	sell assets (other than certain limited restrictions on our ability to consolidate, merge or sell all or substantially all of our assets);
	●	enter into transactions with affiliates;
	●	create liens (including liens on the shares of our subsidiaries) or enter into sale and leaseback transactions;
	●	make investments; or
	●	create restrictions on the payment of dividends or other amounts to us from our subsidiaries.

	Page
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting(BDO USA, P.C.; Atlanta, GA; PCAOB ID#243)	F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Consolidated Financial Statements(BDO USA, P.C.; Atlanta, GA; PCAOB ID#243)	F-2
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31, 2022 and 2021	F-4
Consolidated Statements of Income for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020	F-5
Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity and Temporary Equity for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020	F-6
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020	F-7
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements as of December 31, 2022, 2021 and 2020	F-8

Exhibit Number	Description of Exhibit	Incorporated by Reference from Atlanticus’ SEC Filings Unless Otherwise Indicated(1)
3.1	Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation	November 8, 2022, Form 10-Q, exhibit 3.1
3.1(a)	Articles of Amendment Establishing Cumulative Convertible Preferred Stock, Series A (included as Exhibit B to Exhibit 3.1 hereto)	November 8, 2022, Form 10-Q, exhibit 3.1
3.1(b)	Amended and Restated Articles of Amendment Establishing the 7.625% Series B Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (included as Exhibit C to Exhibit 3.1 hereto)	November 8, 2022, Form 10-Q, exhibit 3.1
3.2	Amended and Restated Bylaws (as amended through May 12, 2017)	May 16, 2017, Form 8-K, exhibit 3.2
4.1	Description of Atlanticus Holdings Corporation's Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934	March 15, 2022, Form 10-K, exhibit 4.1
4.2	Form of common stock certificate	March 30, 2016, Form 10-K, exhibit 4.1
4.3	Indenture, dated as of November 22, 2021, by and between Atlanticus Holdings Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee	November 22, 2021, Form 8-K, exhibit 4.1
4.4	First Supplemental Indenture, dated as of November 22, 2021, by and between Atlanticus Holdings Corporation and U.S. Bank National Association, as trustee	November 22, 2021, Form 8-K, exhibit 4.2
4.5	Form of 6.125% Senior Notes due 2026 (included in Exhibit 4.4)	November 22, 2021, Form 8-K, exhibit 4.3
10.1	Stockholders Agreement dated as of April 28, 1999	January 18, 2000, Form S-1, exhibit 10.1
10.2†	Fourth Amended and Restated 2014 Equity Incentive Plan	April 11, 2019, Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, Appendix A
10.2(a)†	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement–Directors	August 14, 2019, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.2
10.2(b)†	Form of Restricted Stock Agreement–Employees	August 14, 2019, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.3
10.2(c)†	Form of Stock Option Agreement–Directors	August 14, 2019, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.4
10.2(d)†	Form of Stock Option Agreement–Employees	August 14, 2019, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.5
10.2(e)†	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement–Directors	August 14, 2019, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.6
10.2(f)†	Form of Restricted Stock Unit Agreement–Employees	August 14, 2019, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.7
10.3†	Second Amended and Restated Employee Stock Purchase Plan	April 10, 2018, Definitive Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A, Appendix A
10.4†	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 18, 2021, between Atlanticus Holdings Corporation and David G. Hanna	May 14, 2021, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.1
10.5†	Amended and Restated Employment Agreement, dated March 18, 2021, between Atlanticus Holdings Corporation and Jeffrey A. Howard	May 14, 2021, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.2
10.6†	Employment Agreement for William R. McCamey	March 28, 2014, Form 10-K, exhibit 10.8
10.7†	Amended and Restated Consultant Agreement, dated May 1, 2020, between Atlanticus Services Corporation and Denise M. Harrod	May 14, 2021, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.4
10.8†	Outside Director Compensation Package	November 8, 2022, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.1
10.9	Amended and Restated Note Purchase Agreement, dated March 1, 2010, among Merrill Lynch Mortgage Capital Inc., CCFC Corp. (formerly CompuCredit Funding Corp.), Atlanticus Services Corporation (formerly CompuCredit Corporation), and CompuCredit Credit Card Master Note Business Trust	June 25, 2010, Form 8-K/A, exhibit 10.1
10.10	Assumption Agreement dated June 30, 2009 between Atlanticus Holdings Corporation (formerly CompuCredit Holdings Corporation) and Atlanticus Services Corporation (formerly CompuCredit Corporation)	July 7, 2009, Form 8-K, exhibit 10.1
10.11	Master Indenture for Perimeter Master Note Business Trust, dated February 8, 2017, among Perimeter Master Note Business Trust, U.S. Bank National Association and Atlanticus Services Corporation	May 15, 2017, Form 10-Q, exhibit 10.1
10.11(a)*	Series 2017-One Indenture Supplement for Perimeter Master Note Business Trust, dated February 8, 2017	March 15, 2022, Form 10-K, exhibit 10.11(a)
10.11(b)*	Amended and Restated Series 2017-One Indenture Supplement for Perimeter Master Note Business Trust, dated June 11, 2018	March 30, 2020, Form 10-K, exhibit 10.11(a)

	Atlanticus Holdings Corporation


	By:	/s/ Jeffrey A. Howard
		Jeffrey A. Howard President and Chief Executive Officer

	●	Obtaining an understanding, assessing the design and testing the operating effectiveness of controls over the Company’s estimate of the fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable, including controls over management’s review of the significant assumptions and the completeness and accuracy of data used to develop the fair value calculation.
	●	Testing the relevance and reliability of data related to the assumptions by agreeing data to internal and external third-party sources.
	●	Evaluating the assumptions used for the timing of expected cash flows by comparing to historical performance to determine if such assumptions were relevant, reliable, and reasonable for the purpose used, including consideration of evidence (e.g., external economic data and peer data) that may be contradictory to the conclusions reached by management.
	●	Involving professionals with specialized skills and knowledge in valuation to assist in the evaluation of the reasonableness of discount rates assumptions used by management to determine the fair value by comparing to market-based discount rates to determine if such assumptions were relevant, reliable, and reasonable for the purpose used, including consideration of evidence (e.g., external economic data, peer data, internal company data) that may be contradictory to the conclusion reached by management.

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022	*Credit Cards*			*Auto Finance*			*Other Unsecured Lending Products*			*Total*
Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(43.4	)	$	(1.4	)	$	(12.4	)	$	(57.2	)
Cumulative effects from adoption of fair value under the CECL standard		43.4			—			12.4			55.8
Cumulative effects from adoption of the CECL standard		—			(0.2	)		—			(0.2	)
Provision for credit losses		—			(1.3	)		—			(1.3	)
Charge-offs		—			2.6			—			2.6
Recoveries		—			(1.3	)		—			(1.3	)
Balance at end of period	$	—		$	(1.6	)	$	—		$	(1.6	)

As of December 31, 2022	Credit Cards		Auto Finance			Other Unsecured Lending Products		Total
Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable:
Balance at end of period individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Balance at end of period collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	(1.6	)	$	—	$	(1.6	)
Loans, interest and fees receivable:
Loans, interest and fees receivable, gross	$	—	$	105.3		$	—	$	105.3
Loans, interest and fees receivable individually evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	—		$	—	$	—
Loans, interest and fees receivable collectively evaluated for impairment	$	—	$	105.3		$	—	$	105.3

For the Year Ended December 31, 2021	*Credit Cards*			*Auto Finance*			*Other Unsecured Lending Products*			*Total*
Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(88.2	)	$	(1.7	)	$	(35.1	)	$	(125.0	)
Provision for credit losses		(34.9	)		(0.2	)		(1.4	)		(36.5	)
Charge-offs		88.6			1.5			31.1			121.2
Recoveries		(8.9	)		(1.0	)		(7.0	)		(16.9	)
Balance at end of period	$	(43.4	)	$	(1.4	)	$	(12.4	)	$	(57.2	)

As of December 31, 2021	Credit Cards			Auto Finance			Other Unsecured Lending Products			Total
Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable:
Balance at end of period individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	(0.1	)	$	—		$	(0.1	)
Balance at end of period collectively evaluated for impairment	$	(43.4	)	$	(1.3	)	$	(12.4	)	$	(57.1	)
Loans, interest and fees receivable:
Loans, interest and fees receivable, gross	$	259.5		$	94.6		$	116.2		$	470.3
Loans, interest and fees receivable individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	0.4		$	—		$	0.4
Loans, interest and fees receivable collectively evaluated for impairment	$	259.5		$	94.2		$	116.2		$	469.9

For the Year Ended December 31, 2020	Credit Cards			Auto Finance			Other Unsecured Lending Products			Total
Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable:
Balance at beginning of period	$	(121.3	)	$	(1.6	)	$	(63.4	)	$	(186.3	)
Provision for credit losses		(112.1	)		(2.0	)		(28.6	)		(142.7	)
Charge-offs		155.1			3.0			72.1			230.2
Recoveries		(9.9	)		(1.1	)		(15.2	)		(26.2	)
Balance at end of period	$	(88.2	)	$	(1.7	)	$	(35.1	)	$	(125.0	)

As of December 31, 2020	Credit Cards			Auto Finance			Other Unsecured Lending Products			Total
Allowance for uncollectible loans, interest and fees receivable:
Balance at end of period individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	(0.3	)	$	—		$	(0.3	)
Balance at end of period collectively evaluated for impairment	$	(88.2	)	$	(1.4	)	$	(35.1	)	$	(124.7	)
Loans, interest and fees receivable:
Loans, interest and fees receivable, gross	$	364.2		$	93.2		$	210.2		$	667.6
Loans, interest and fees receivable individually evaluated for impairment	$	—		$	2.3		$	—		$	2.3
Loans, interest and fees receivable collectively evaluated for impairment	$	364.2		$	90.9		$	210.2		$	665.3

As of December 31, 2022	*Credit Cards*		*Auto Finance*		*Other Unsecured Lending Products*		*Total*
30-59 days past due	$	—	$	8.5	$	—	$	8.5
60-89 days past due		—		3.0		—		3.0
90 or more days past due		—		2.1		—		2.1
Delinquent loans, interest and fees receivable, gross		—		13.6		—		13.6
Current loans, interest and fees receivable, gross		—		91.7		—		91.7
Total loans, interest and fees receivable, gross	$	—	$	105.3	$	—	$	105.3
Balance of loans greater than 90-days delinquent still accruing interest and fees	$	—	$	1.7	$	—	$	1.7

As of December 31, 2021	*Credit Cards*		*Auto Finance*		*Other Unsecured Lending Products*		*Total*
30-59 days past due	$	7.3	$	7.0	$	3.3	$	17.6
60-89 days past due		6.9		2.5		2.6		12.0
90 or more days past due		17.9		1.8		6.8		26.5
Delinquent loans, interest and fees receivable, gross		32.1		11.3		12.7		56.1
Current loans, interest and fees receivable, gross		227.4		83.3		103.5		414.2
Total loans, interest and fees receivable, gross	$	259.5	$	94.6	$	116.2	$	470.3
Balance of loans greater than 90-days delinquent still accruing interest and fees	$	—	$	1.5	$	—	$	1.5

	*As of*
	*December 31, 2022*				*December 31, 2021*				*December 31, 2020*
	*Private label credit*		*General purpose credit card*		*Private label credit*		*General purpose credit card*		*Private label credit*		*General purpose credit card*
Number of TDRs		24,594		171,729		14,919		39,322		12,394		37,784
Number of TDRs that have been re-aged		2,499		28,598		812		2,035		2,788		7,846
Amount of TDRs on non-accrual status (in thousands)	$	31,350	$	119,785	$	17,152	$	25,154	$	14,537	$	26,989
Amount of TDRs on non-accrual status above that have been re-aged (in thousands)	$	4,606	$	24,440	$	1,205	$	1,553	$	4,662	$	6,890
Carrying value of TDRs (in thousands)	$	18,827	$	70,519	$	11,173	$	15,502	$	9,583	$	14,287
TDRs - Performing (carrying value, in thousands)*	$	15,001	$	59,735	$	8,797	$	13,387	$	7,420	$	11,855
TDRs - Nonperforming (carrying value, in thousands)*	$	3,826	$	10,784	$	2,376	$	2,115	$	2,163	$	2,432


	*Twelve Months Ended*
	*December 31, 2022*				*December 31, 2021*				*December 31, 2020*
	*Private label credit*		*General purpose credit card*		*Private label credit*		*General purpose credit card*		*Private label credit*		*General purpose credit card*
Number of accounts		7,049		28,714		3,119		7,765		3,065		7,665
Loan balance at time of charge off (in thousands)	$	11,302	$	22,679	$	4,642	$	6,455	$	4,352	$	6,745

For the Year Ended December 31, 2022	CaaS		Auto Finance		Total
Interchange revenues, net (1)	$	24,926	$	—	$	24,926
Servicing income		3,259		888		4,147
Service charges and other customer related fees		13,658		67		13,725
Total revenue from contracts with customers	$	41,843	$	955	$	42,798

Year Ended December 31, 2022	*CaaS*			*Auto Finance*			*Total*
Revenue:
Consumer loans, including past due fees	$	751,052		$	35,183		$	786,235
Fees and related income on earning assets		216,989			82			217,071
Other revenue		41,843			955			42,798
Other non-operating revenue		698			111			809
Total revenue		1,010,582			36,331			1,046,913
Interest expense		(79,875	)		(1,976	)		(81,851	)
Provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable recorded at amortized cost		—			(1,252	)		(1,252	)
Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value		(577,069	)		—			(577,069	)
Net margin	$	353,638		$	33,103		$	386,741
Income before income taxes	$	146,577		$	2,695		$	149,272
Income tax expense	$	(14,122	)	$	(538	)	$	(14,660	)
Total assets	$	2,295,092		$	92,722		$	2,387,814

Year Ended December 31, 2021	*CaaS*			*Auto Finance*			*Total*
Revenue:
Consumer loans, including past due fees	$	485,241		$	33,542		$	518,783
Fees and related income on earning assets		194,392			74			194,466
Other revenue		29,322			1,284			30,606
Other non-operating revenue		4,135			66			4,201
Total revenue		713,090			34,966			748,056
Interest expense		(53,093	)		(1,034	)		(54,127	)
Provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable recorded at amortized cost		(36,262	)		(193	)		(36,455	)
Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value		(218,733	)		—			(218,733	)
Net margin	$	405,002		$	33,739		$	438,741
Income before income taxes	$	208,926		$	10,647		$	219,573
Income tax expense	$	(39,221	)	$	(2,563	)	$	(41,784	)
Total assets	$	1,859,950		$	83,913		$	1,943,863

Year Ended December 31, 2020	*CaaS*			*Auto Finance*			*Total*
Revenue:
Consumer loans, including past due fees	$	378,817		$	31,799		$	410,616
Fees and related income on earning assets		133,891			69			133,960
Other revenue		14,372			1,059			15,431
Other non-operating revenue		3,360			43			3,403
Total revenue		530,440			32,970			563,410
Interest expense		(50,387	)		(1,161	)		(51,548	)
Provision for losses on loans, interest and fees receivable recorded at amortized cost		(140,683	)		(2,036	)		(142,719	)
Changes in fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable and notes payable associated with structured financings recorded at fair value		(108,548	)		—			(108,548	)
Net margin	$	230,822		$	29,773		$	260,595
Income before income taxes	$	105,429		$	8,962		$	114,391
Income tax expense	$	(18,257	)	$	(2,217	)	$	(20,474	)
Total assets	$	1,124,618		$	82,596		$	1,207,214

Assets – As of December 31, 2022 (1)	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Carrying Amount of Assets
Loans, interest and fees receivable, net for which it is practicable to estimate fair value and which are carried at net amortized cost	$	—	$	—	$	94,968	$	87,434
Loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value	$	—	$	—	$	1,817,976	$	1,817,976

	Loans, Interest and Fees Receivables, at Fair Value
	2022			2021			2020
Balance at January 1,	$	1,026,424		$	417,098		$	4,386
Cumulative effects from adoption of fair value under the CECL standard		314,985			—			—
Net revaluations of loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value, included in earnings		(32,574	)		(110,283	)		(96,948	)
Principal charge-offs, net of recoveries, included in earnings		(367,213	)		(78,463	)		(9,855	)
Finance and fees, included in earnings		874,749			366,307			103,983
Finance charge-offs, included in earnings		(177,282	)		(30,794	)		(2,746	)
Purchases		2,466,676			1,626,062			713,579
Settlements		(2,287,789	)		(1,163,503	)		(295,301	)
Balance at December 31,	$	1,817,976		$	1,026,424		$	417,098

Fair Value Measurement	Fair Value at December 31, 2022 (in thousands)		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range (Weighted Average)
Loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value	$	1,817,976	Discounted cash flows	Gross yield, net of finance charge charge-offs		24.7% to 36.1% (31.6%)
				Payment rate		5.0% to 11.4% (10.3%)
				Expected principal credit loss rate		9.2% to 30.3% (30.2%)
				Servicing rate		3.5% to 6.4% (3.6%)
				Discount rate		9.8% to 10.5% (10.1%)

Fair Value Measurement	*Fair Value at December 31, 2021 (in thousands)*		*Valuation Technique*	*Unobservable Input*	*Range (Weighted Average)*
Loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value	$	1,026,424	Discounted cash flows	Gross yield, net of finance charge charge-offs		27.8% to 46.9% (40.9%)
				Payment rate		5.4% to 12.9% (10.6%)
				Expected principal credit loss rate		7.8% to 26.4% (23.5%)
				Servicing rate		3.4% to 5.7% (4.6%)
				Discount rate		12.3% to 13.5% (12.9%)

*Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurement*
Fair Value Measurement	*Fair Value at December 31, 2020 (in thousands)*		*Valuation Technique*	*Unobservable Input*	*Range (Weighted Average)*
Loans, interest and fees receivable, at fair value	$	417,098	Discounted cash flows	Gross yield, net of finance charge charge-offs		22.7% to 56.5% (43.3%)
				Payment rate		3.9% to 11.4% (8.5%)
				Expected principal credit loss rate		6.9% to 31.4% (24.8%)
				Servicing rate		2.9% to 14.2% (4.3%)
				Discount rate		12.8% to 13.5% (13.3%)

Liabilities – As of December 31, 2022	Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)		Carrying Amount of Liabilities
*Liabilities not carried at fair value*
Revolving credit facilities	$	—	$	—	$	1,630,111	$	1,630,111
Amortizing debt facilities	$	—	$	—	$	23,195	$	23,195
Senior notes, net	$	125,640	$	—	$	—	$	144,385

	Notes Payable Associated with Structured Financings, at Fair Value
	2021			2020
Balance at January 1,	$	2,919		$	3,920
Net revaluations of notes payable associated with structured financings, at fair value, included in earnings		(807	)		(1,001	)
Repayments on outstanding notes payable, net		(2,112	)		—
Balance at December 31,	$	—		$	2,919

As of December 31, 2022	Loans, Interest and Fees Receivable at Fair Value		Loans, Interest and Fees Receivable Pledged as Collateral under Structured Financings at Fair Value
Aggregate unpaid gross balance of loans, interest and fees receivable that are reported at fair value	$	786	$	2,119,340
Aggregate unpaid principal balance included within loans, interest and fees receivable that are reported at fair value	$	760	$	1,910,090
Aggregate fair value of loans, interest and fees receivable that are reported at fair value	$	765	$	1,817,211
Aggregate fair value of receivables carried at fair value that are 90 days or more past due (which also coincides with finance charge and fee non-accrual policies)	$	3	$	8,362
Unpaid principal balance of receivables within loans, interest and fees receivable that are reported at fair value and are 90 days or more past due (which also coincides with finance charge and fee non-accrual policies) over the fair value of such loans, interest and fees receivable	$	4	$	144,767

	*As of December 31,*
	*2022*			*2021*
Software	$	850		$	1,695
Furniture and fixtures		2,872			3,540
Data processing and telephone equipment		502			692
Leasehold improvements		3,437			10,539
Other		6,910			6,909
Total cost		14,571			23,375
Less accumulated depreciation		(4,558	)		(16,040	)
Property, net	$	10,013		$	7,335

	For the Year Ended December 31,
	2022			2021			2020
Operating lease cost, gross	$	4,431		$	6,905		$	6,879
Sublease income		(2,165	)		(5,234	)		(5,133	)
Net Operating lease cost	$	2,266		$	1,671		$	1,746
Cash paid under operating leases, gross	$	4,053		$	10,470		$	10,278

Weighted average remaining lease term - months		133
Weighted average discount rate		6.5	%

	Gross Lease Payment			Payments received from Sublease			Net Lease Payment
2023	$	1,662		$	(39	)	$	1,623
2024		2,777			—			2,777
2025		2,629			—			2,629
2026		2,489			—			2,489
2027		2,466			—			2,466
Thereafter		17,338			—			17,338
Total lease payments		29,361			(39	)		29,322
Less imputed interest		(9,249	)
Total	$	20,112

(3)	See below for additional information.
(4)	Loans are subject to certain affirmative covenants tied to default rates and other performance metrics the failure of which could result in required early repayment of the remaining unamortized balances of the notes.